summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--44541-0.txt3026
-rw-r--r--44541-h/44541-h.htm5195
-rw-r--r--44541-h/images/cover.jpgbin0 -> 198724 bytes
-rw-r--r--44541-h/images/i_0231.jpgbin0 -> 152691 bytes
-rw-r--r--44541-h/images/i_0331.jpgbin0 -> 149726 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/44541-8.txt3418
-rw-r--r--old/44541-8.zipbin0 -> 69661 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/44541-h.zipbin0 -> 577495 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/44541-h/44541-h.htm5614
-rw-r--r--old/44541-h/images/cover.jpgbin0 -> 198724 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/44541-h/images/i_0231.jpgbin0 -> 152691 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/44541-h/images/i_0331.jpgbin0 -> 149726 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/44541.txt3418
-rw-r--r--old/44541.zipbin0 -> 69545 bytes
17 files changed, 20687 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/44541-0.txt b/44541-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..74d9551
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44541-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3026 @@
+*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44541 ***
+
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+ OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE
+ DESCENT OF MAN
+
+ BY
+
+ ERNST HAECKEL
+ (JENA)
+
+ WITH NOTES AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES
+
+ BY
+
+ HANS GADOW, F.R.S.
+ (CAMBRIDGE)
+
+
+ LONDON
+ ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK
+ 1898
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+ PAGE
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+ INTRODUCTORY 1
+
+ COMPARATIVE ANATOMY 8
+
+ PALÆONTOLOGY 20
+
+ OTHER EVIDENCE 42
+
+ STAGES RECAPITULATED 47
+
+ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES:
+
+ LAMARCK, SAINT-HILAIRE, CUVIER, BAER,
+ MUELLER, VIRCHOW, COPE, KOELLIKER, GEGENBAUR,
+ HAECKEL 80
+
+ THEORY OF CELLS 115
+
+ FACTORS OF EVOLUTION 117
+
+ GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION 135
+
+
+
+ NOTE
+
+
+The address I delivered on August 26 at the Fourth International
+Congress of Zoology at Cambridge, 'On our Present Knowledge of the
+Descent of Man,' has, I find, from the high significance of the theme
+and the general importance of the questions connected with it, excited
+much interest, and has led to requests for its publication. Hence this
+volume, edited by my friend Dr. H. Gadow, my pupil in earlier days,
+who has not only revised the text, but has also enriched it by many
+valuable additions and notes.
+
+ ERNST HAECKEL.
+
+_Jena, December, 1898._
+
+
+
+
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+
+At the end of the nineteenth century, the age of 'natural science,' the
+department of knowledge that has made most progress is zoology. From
+zoology has arisen the study of transformism, which now dominates the
+whole of biology. Lamarck[1] laid its foundation in 1809, and forty
+years ago Charles Darwin obtained for it a recognition which is now
+universal. It is not my task to repeat the well-known principles of
+Darwinism. I am not concerned to explain the scientific value of the
+whole theory of descent. The whole of our biological study is pervaded
+by it. No general problem in zoology and botany, in anatomy and
+physiology, can be discussed without the question arising, How has this
+problem originated? What are the real causes of its development?
+
+ [1] See note, p. 80.
+
+This question was almost unknown seventy years ago, when Charles
+Darwin, the great reformer of biology, began his academical career at
+Cambridge as a student of theology. In the same year, 1828, Carl Ernst
+von Baer[2] published in Germany his classical work on the embryology
+of animals, the first successful attempt to elucidate by 'observation
+and reflection' the mysterious origin of the animal body from the
+egg, and to explain in every respect the 'history of the growing
+individuality.' Darwin at that time had no knowledge of this great
+advance, and he could not divine that forty years later embryology
+would be one of the strongest supports of his own life's work--of that
+very theory of transformism which, founded by Lamarck in the year of
+Darwin's birth, was accepted with enthusiasm by Charles's grandfather
+Erasmus. There is no doubt that of all the celebrated naturalists of
+the nineteenth century Darwin achieved the greatest success, and we
+should be justified in designating the last forty years as the Age of
+Darwin.
+
+ [2] See note, p. 89.
+
+In searching for the causes of this unexampled success, we must clearly
+separate three sets of considerations: first, the comprehensive reform
+of Lamarck's transformism, and its firm establishment by the many
+arguments drawn from modern biology; secondly, the construction of the
+new theory of selection, as established by Darwin, and independently
+by Alfred Wallace (a theory called Darwinism in the proper sense);
+thirdly, the deduction of anthropogeny, that most important conclusion
+of the theory of descent, the value of which far surpasses all the
+other truths in evolution.
+
+It is the third point of Darwin's theory that I shall discuss here; and
+I shall discuss it chiefly with the intention of examining critically
+the evidence and the different conclusions which at present represent
+our scientific knowledge of the descent of man and of the different
+stages of his animal pedigree.
+
+It is now generally admitted that this problem is the most important
+of all biological questions. Huxley was right when in 1863 he called
+it the question of questions for mankind. The problem which underlies
+all others, and is more deeply interesting than any other, is as
+to the place which man occupies in nature and his relations to the
+universe of things. 'Whence our race has come; what are the limits of
+our power over nature, and of nature's power over us; to what goal are
+we tending--these are the problems which present themselves anew and
+with undiminished interest to every man born into the world.' This
+impressive view was explained by Huxley thirty-five years ago in his
+three celebrated essays on 'Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature.' The
+first is entitled 'On the Natural History of the Man-like Apes'; the
+second, 'On the Relations of Man to the Lower Animals'; the third, 'On
+some Fossil Remains of Man.' Darwin himself felt the burden of these
+problems as much as Huxley; but in his chief work, 'On the Origin of
+Species,' in 1859, he had purposely only just touched them, suggesting
+that the theory of descent would shed light upon the origin of man and
+his history. Twelve years later, in his celebrated work on 'The Descent
+of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex,' Darwin discussed fully and
+ingeniously all the different sides of this 'question of questions'
+from the morphological, historical, physiological, and psychological
+points of view. As early as 1866 I myself had applied in the _Generelle
+Morphologie der Organismen_ the theory of transformism to anthropology,
+and had shown that the fundamental law of biogeny claims the same
+value for man as for all the other animals. The intimate causal
+connection between ontogeny and phylogeny, between the development of
+the individual and the history of its ancestors, enables us to gain
+a safe and certain knowledge of our ancestral series. I had at that
+time distinguished in this series ten chief degrees of vertebrate
+organization. I attributed the highest importance to the logical
+connection of anthropogeny with transformism. If the latter be true,
+the truth of the former is absolute. 'Our theory that man is descended
+from lower vertebrates, and immediately from apes or primates, is a
+case of special _deduction_ which follows with absolute certainty from
+the general _induction_ of the theory of descent.' The full proof and
+detailed explanation of this view was afterwards given in my 'History
+of Natural Creation,' and especially in my 'Anthropogeny.'[3] Lastly,
+it has received an ample scientific and critical foundation in the
+third part of my 'Systematic Phylogeny.'[3]
+
+ [3] See notes, pp. 102, 106
+
+During the forty years which have elapsed since Darwin's first
+publication of his theories an enormous literature, discussing the
+_general problems_ of transformism as well as its special application
+to man, has been published. In spite of the wide divergence of the
+different views, all agree in one main point: the natural development
+of man cannot be separated from general transformism. There are only
+two possibilities. Either all the various species of animals and
+plants have been created independently by supernatural forces (and
+in this case the creation of man also is a miracle); or the species
+have been produced in a natural way by transmutation, by adaptation
+and progressive heredity (and in this case man also is descended from
+other vertebrates, and immediately from a series of primates). We are
+absolutely convinced that only the latter theory is fully scientific.
+To prove its truth, we have to examine critically the strength of the
+different arguments claimed for it.
+
+
+
+
+ I.
+
+
+First, we have to consider the relative place which comparative
+anatomy concedes to man in the 'natural system' of animals, for the
+true value of our 'natural classification' is based upon its meaning
+as a pedigree. All the minor and major groups of the system--the
+classes, legions, orders, families, genera, and species--are only
+different branches of the same pedigree. For man himself, his place
+in the pedigree has been fixed since Lamarck,[4] in 1801, defined the
+group of vertebrates. The most perfect[5] of these are the Mammalia;
+and at the head of this class stands the order of Primates, in which
+Linnæus, in 1735, united four 'genera'--Homo, Simia, Lemur, and
+Vespertilio. If we exclude the last-named, the Chiroptera of modern
+zoology, there remain three natural groups of Primates--the Lemures,
+the Simiæ, and the Anthropi or Hominidæ. This is the classification of
+the majority of zoologists; but if we compare man with the two chief
+groups of monkeys--the Eastern monkeys (or Catarrhinæ) and the Western
+or American monkeys (Platyrrhinæ)--there can be no doubt that the
+former group is much more closely related to man than is the latter.
+In the natural order of the Catarrhinæ we find united a long series
+of lower and higher forms. The lowest, the Cynopitheci, appear still
+closely related to the Platyrrhinæ and to the Lemures; while, on the
+other hand, the tailless apes (Anthropomorphæ) approach man through
+their higher organization. Hence one of our best authorities on the
+Primates, Robert Hartmann,[6] proposed to subdivide the whole order of
+the Simiæ into three groups: (1) Primarii, man together with the other
+Anthropomorphæ, or tailless apes; (2) Simiæ, all the other monkeys; (3)
+Prosimiæ, or Lemurs. This arrangement has received strong support from
+the interesting discovery by Selenka that the peculiar placentation
+of the human embryo is the same as in the great apes, and different
+from that of all the other monkeys. Our choice between these different
+classifications of Primates is best determined by the important thesis
+of Huxley, in which, in 1863, he carried out a most careful and
+critical comparison of all the anatomical gradations within this order.
+In my opinion, this ingenious thesis--which I have called the Huxleyan
+Law, or the 'Pithecometra-thesis of Huxley'--is of the utmost value.
+It runs as follows: 'Thus, whatever system of organs be studied, the
+comparison of their modifications in the ape-series leads to one and
+the same result--that the structural differences which separate man
+from the gorilla and the chimpanzee are not so great as those which
+separate the gorilla from the lower apes.' If we accept the Huxleyan
+law without prejudice, and apply it to the natural classification of
+the Primates, we must concede that man's place is within the order
+of the Simiæ. On examining this relation with care, and judging
+with logical persistence, we may even go a step further. Instead of
+the wider conception of 'Simiæ,' we must use the restricted term of
+Catarrhinæ, and our Pithecometra-thesis has then to be formulated
+as follows: _The comparative anatomy of all organs of the group of
+Catarrhine Simiæ leads to the result that the morphological differences
+between man and the great apes are not so great as are those between
+the man-like apes and the lowest Catarrhinæ_. In fact, it is very
+difficult to show why man should not be classed with the large apes in
+the same zoological family. We all know a man from an ape; but it is
+quite another thing to find differences which are absolute and not of
+degree only. Speaking generally, we may say that man alone combines the
+four following features: (1) Erect walk; (2) extremities differentiated
+accordingly; (3) articulate speech; (4) higher reasoning power. Speech
+and reason are obviously relative distinctions only--the direct result
+of more brains and more brain-power, the so-called mental faculties.
+The erect walk is not an absolutely distinguishing characteristic: the
+large apes likewise walk on their feet only, supporting their bodies
+by touching the ground with the backs of their hands--in fact, with
+their knuckles--and this is a mode of progression very different from
+that of the tailed monkeys, which walk upon the palms of their hands.
+There are, however, two obvious differences in the development of the
+muscles. In man alone the gastrocnemius and the soleus muscle are thick
+enough to form the calf of the leg, and the glutæus maximus is enlarged
+into the buttocks. A fourth glutæal muscle occurs occasionally in
+man, while it is constantly present in apes as the so-called musculus
+scansorius. Concerning the muscles of the whole body, we cannot do
+better than quote Testut's summary: 'The mass of recorded observations
+upon the muscular anomalies in man is so great, and the agreement of
+many of these with the condition normal in apes is so marked, that the
+gap which usually separates the muscular system of man from that of the
+apes appears to be completely bridged over.'
+
+ [4] See note, p. 80.
+
+ [5] _Perfect_, in the sense of highest stage of evolution, may seem a
+ _petitio principii_. Leaving aside the consideration that no living
+ creature is absolutely perfect, in the sense that its organization
+ cannot become more efficient or proficient, we have here to deal with
+ relative perfection of the whole organization. A fish or a snake is in
+ its way more specialized than a mammal; but specialization does not
+ necessarily mean height of development: it generally means life in a
+ comparatively narrow groove. The acts of giving birth and nourishing
+ the young with the mother's milk is a much higher stage than the act
+ of laying eggs and letting them run their chance. The development of
+ a hairy coat goes along with heightened temperature of the blood,
+ subsequent greater independence of the surrounding temperature, and
+ increased steady activity of the brain and other nerve-centres. The
+ brain of the Mammalia, in its minute structure, is much more complex.
+ This rule applies to some of the principal sense organs, chiefly the
+ nose and the ear. The skeleton, not so much as a whole as in the
+ various bones and joints, is more neatly finished, and built up more
+ in conformity with 'scientific principles,' than is the case even with
+ birds, in spite of their marvellous specialization. The same is the
+ case with the vascular system, notably the heart and the veins, and
+ with the excretory organs. In all of these many imperfections, still
+ to be found in the other classes, have been corrected in Mammalia. The
+ Primates take an easy first by their hands, and among them the apes and
+ man himself by their brains.
+
+ [6] 'Die menschenähnlichen Affen und ihre Organisation im Vergleich zur
+ menschlichen.' 1883.
+
+There are, for example, the muscles of the ear. In most people the
+majority, or even all of them, are no longer movable at will, while in
+the apes they are still in use. The important point, however, is that
+these muscles are still present in man, although often in a reduced
+condition. They are the following: (1) Musculus auricularis anterior
+or attrahens auris, which is frequently much reduced and no longer
+reaches the ear at all, being then absolutely useless; (2) Musculus
+auricularis superior or attollens auris, more constant than the former;
+(3) Musculus auricularis posterior or retrahens auris, likewise often
+functional. Occasionally smaller slips differentiated from these
+three muscles are present, and as so-called intrinsic muscles are
+restricted to the ear itself; their function is, or was, that of
+curling up or opening the external ear.
+
+[Illustration: OUTLINES OF THE LEFT EAR OF--
+
+1. _Lemur macaco_; 2. _Macacus rhesus_, the Rhesus monkey; 3.
+Cercopithecus, a macaque; 4. human embryo of six months; 5. man, with
+Darwin's point well retained: the dotted outline is that of the ear of
+a baboon; 6. orang-utan (after G. Schwalbe):[7] ^x the original tip of
+the ear; 7. human ear with the principal muscles.
+
+ [7] G. Schwalbe, 'In wiefern ist die menschliche Ohrmuschel ein
+ rudimentäres Organ?'--In what Respects is the Human Outer Ear a
+ Rudimentary Organ? (_Archiv f. Anatomie und Physiologie_, 1889).]
+
+In connection with the ear, I may touch upon another interesting
+and most suggestive little feature which is present in many
+individuals--namely, 'Darwin's point.' This is the last remnant of the
+original tip of the ear, before the outer, upper, and hinder rim became
+doubled up or folded in. It is a feature quite useless, and absolutely
+impossible of interpretation, excepting as the vestige of such previous
+ancestral conditions as are normal in the monkeys.
+
+In some cases the reduction of muscles has proceeded further in apes
+than in man--for example, the muscles of the little toe. Another
+instance is afforded by the coccyx or vestige of the tail; this is
+still furnished with muscles which are now in man, as well as in
+the apes, quite useless, and vary considerably with every sign of
+degeneration, most so in the orang-utan.
+
+Darwin has mentioned the frequent action of the 'snarling muscle,' by
+which, in sneering, our upper canine teeth are exposed, like those of a
+dog prepared to fight.
+
+Monkeys and apes possess vocal sacs, especially large in the
+orang-utan; survivals of them, although no longer used, persist in man
+in the shape of a pair of small diverticula, the pouches of Morgagni,
+between the true and the false vocal cords.
+
+'In the native Australians, the dental formula appears least removed
+from the hypothetical original type, for in it are still found complete
+rows of splendid teeth, with powerfully-developed canines and molars,
+the latter being either uniform, or even increasing in size, as we
+proceed backwards, in such a way that the wisdom tooth is the largest
+of the series. This is decidedly a pithecoid characteristic which is
+always found in apes. The upper incisors of the Malay, apart from their
+prognathous disposition, have occasionally a distinctly pithecoid
+form, their anterior surface being convex, and their lingual surface
+slightly concave. The ancestors of Europeans seem to have had the same
+form of teeth, for the oldest existing fragments of skulls from the
+Mammoth age (_e.g._, the jaws from La Naulette, in Belgium) reveal
+tooth-forms which must be classed with those of the lowest races of
+to-day.'[8]
+
+ [8] Wiedersheim, 'Der Bau des Menschen als Zeugniss für seine
+ Vergangenheit.' Freiburg, 1888. Translated: 'The Structure of Man an
+ Index to his Past History.' London, 1895.
+
+Now we are able to apply this fundamental Pithecometra-thesis directly
+to the classification of the Primates and to the phylogeny of man,
+which is intimately connected with it, because in this order, as in
+all the other groups of animals, the natural system is the clear
+expression of true phylogenetic affinity. Four results follow from our
+thesis: (1) The Primates, as the highest legion or order of mammals,
+form one natural, monophyletic group. All the Lemures, Simiæ, and
+Homines descend from one common ancestral form, from a hypothetical
+'Archiprimas.' (2) The Lemures are the older and lower of the natural
+groups of the Primates; they stand between the oldest Placentalia
+(Prochoriata) and the true Simiæ. (3) All the Catarrhinæ, or Eastern
+Simiæ, form one natural monophyletic group. Their hypothetical
+common ancestor, the Archipithecus, may have descended directly or
+indirectly from a branch of the Lemures. (4) Man is descended directly
+from one series of extinct Catarrhine ancestors. The more recent
+ancestors of this series were tailless anthropoids (similar to the
+Anthropopithecus), with five sacral vertebræ. The more remote ancestors
+were tailed Cercopitheci, with three or four sacral vertebræ.
+
+These four theses possess, in my opinion, absolute certainty.
+They are independent of all future anatomical, embryological, and
+palæontological discoveries which may possibly throw more light upon
+the details of our phyletic anthropogenesis.
+
+
+
+
+ II.
+
+
+The next question is, how the facts of palæontology agree with these
+most important results of comparative anatomy and ontogeny. The fossils
+are the true historical 'medals of creation,' the palpable evidence of
+the historical succession of all those innumerable organic forms which
+have peopled the globe for many millions of years. Here the question
+arises, If the known fossil specimens of Mammalia, and particularly
+of Primates, give proof of these Pithecometra-theses, do they confirm
+directly the descent of man from ape-like creatures? The answer to this
+question is, in my opinion, affirmative.
+
+It is true that the gaps in the palæontological evidence, here as
+elsewhere, are many and keenly felt. In the order of the Primates
+they are greater than in many other orders, chiefly because of the
+arboreal life of our ancestors. The explanation is very simple. It is
+really due to a long chain of favourable coincidences if the skeleton
+of a vertebrate, covered as it was with flesh and skin, and containing
+still more perishable viscera, is petrified at all. The body may be
+devoured by other creatures, and its bones scattered about; or it rots
+away and crumbles to pieces. Many animals hide in thick undergrowth
+when death approaches them; and, leading an almost entirely arboreal
+life, the Primates are especially likely to disappear without being
+fossilized. It is only when the body is quickly covered with sand, or
+is embedded in suitable lime or silica containing mud, that the process
+of petrifaction can come to pass. Even then it is only by great good
+luck that we come across such a fossil. Very few countries have been
+searched systematically, and the areas that have been searched amount
+to little in comparison with the whole surface of the land, even if we
+leave out of account the fact that more than two-thirds of the globe
+are covered by water.
+
+These deplorable deficiencies of empirical palæontology are balanced
+on the other side by a growing number of positive facts, which possess
+an inestimable value in human phylogeny. The most interesting and most
+important of these is the celebrated fossil _Pithecanthropus erectus_,
+discovered in Java in 1894 by Dr. Eugène Dubois.[9] Three years ago
+this now famous ape-like man provoked an animated discussion at the
+third International Zoological Congress at Leyden. I may therefore
+be allowed to say a few words as to its scientific significance.
+Unfortunately, the fossil remains of this creature are very scanty: the
+skull-cap, a femur, and two teeth. It is obviously impossible to form
+from these scanty remains a complete and satisfactory reconstruction of
+this remarkable Pliocene Primate.
+
+[9] _Pithecanthropus erectus._ 'Eine menschenähnliche Uebergangsform
+aus Java' ('A Human-like Transitional Form'). Batavia, 1894.
+
+The more important points are the following: The remains in question
+rested upon a conglomerate which lies upon a bed of marine marl and
+sand of Pliocene age. Together with the bones of Pithecanthropus were
+found those of Stegodon, Leptobos, Rhinoceros, Sus, Felis, Hyæna,
+Hippopotamus, Tapir, Elephas, and a gigantic Pangolin. It is remarkable
+that the first two of these genera are now extinct, and that neither
+hippopotamus nor hyæna exists any longer in the Oriental region. If we
+may judge from these fossil remains, the bones of Pithecanthropus are
+not younger than the oldest Pleistocene, and probably belong to the
+upper Pliocene. The teeth are like those of man. The femur, also, is
+very human, but shows some resemblances to that of the gibbons. Its
+size, however, indicates an animal which stood when erect not less
+than 5 feet 6 inches high. The skull-cap also is very human, but with
+very prominent eyebrow ridges, like those of the famous Neanderthal
+cranium. It is certainly not that of an idiot. It had an estimated
+cranial capacity of about 1,000 cubic centimetres--that is to say, much
+more than that of the largest ape, which possesses not more than 600
+c.c. The crania of female Australians and Veddahs measure not more than
+1,100, some even less than 1,000 c.c.; but, as these Veddah women stand
+only about 4 feet 9 inches high, the computed cranial capacity of the
+much taller Pithecanthropus is comparatively very low indeed.[10]
+
+ [10] On the day after the delivery of this address Dr. Dubois exhibited
+ the cranium of Pithecanthropus, from which he had removed the stony
+ matrix which filled the inside, in order to examine the impression left
+ by the cerebral convolutions. He was able to show that they also are
+ very human, and more highly developed than those of the recent apes. [
+ Illustration: The upper figure represents the outlines
+ of the skull of Pithecanthropus, as restored by Manouvier.[11] The
+ lower figure shows the comparative size and shape of Pithecanthropus,
+ the Neanderthal skull, a specimen of the Cro-Magnon race of neolithic
+ France, and a Young Chimpanzee before the full development of the
+ supraorbital crests.]
+
+ [11] L. Manouvier: 'Deuxième étude sur le Pithecanthropus erectus comme
+ précurseur présumé de l'homme.' (_Bulletins de la Soc. d'Anthropologie
+ de Paris_, 1895.)
+
+The final result of the long discussion at Leyden was that, of twelve
+experts present, three held that the fossil remains belonged to a low
+race of man; three declared them to be those of a man-like ape of great
+size; the rest maintained that they belonged to an intermediate
+form, which directly connected primitive man with the anthropoid
+apes. This last view is the right one, and accords with the laws of
+logical inference. _Pithecanthropus erectus_ of Dubois is truly a
+Pliocene remainder of that famous group of highest Catarrhines which
+were the immediate pithecoid ancestors of man. He is, indeed, the
+long-searched-for 'missing link,' for which, in 1866, I myself had
+proposed the hypothetical genus Pithecanthropus, species Alalus.
+
+It must, however, be admitted that this opinion is still strongly
+combated by some distinguished authorities. At the Leyden Congress it
+was attacked by the illustrious pathologist Rudolf Virchow.[12] He,
+however, is one of the minority of leading men of science who set
+themselves to refute the theory of Evolution in every possible way. For
+thirty years he has defended the thesis: 'It is quite certain that man
+is not a descendant of apes.' He declares any intermediate form to be
+unimaginable save in a dream.
+
+ [12] See Notes, p. 93.
+
+Virchow went to the Leyden Congress with the set purpose of disproving
+that the bones found by Dubois belonged to a creature which linked
+together apes and man. First, he maintained that the skull was that
+of an ape, while the thigh belonged to man. This insinuation was at
+once refuted by the expert palæontologists, who declared that without
+the slightest doubt the bones belonged to one and the same individual.
+Next, Virchow explained that certain exostoses or growths observable on
+the thigh proved its human nature, since only under careful treatment
+the patient could have healed the original injury. Thereupon Professor
+Marsh, the celebrated palæontologist, exhibited a number of thigh-bones
+of wild monkeys which showed similar exostoses and had healed without
+hospital treatment. As a last argument the Berlin pathologist declared
+that the deep constriction behind the upper margin of the orbits
+proved that the skull was that of an ape, as such never occurred in
+man. It so happened that a few weeks later Professor Nehring of Berlin
+demonstrated exactly the same formation on a human prehistoric skull
+received by him from Santos, in Brazil.
+
+Virchow was, in fact, just as unlucky in Leyden in his fight with our
+pliocene ancestor as he had been unfortunate in his opinion on the
+famous skulls of Neanderthal, Spy, La Naulette, etc., every one of which
+he explained as a pathological abnormality. It would be a very curious
+coincidence indeed if all these and other fossil human remains were
+those of idiots or otherwise abnormal individuals, provided they are
+old and low enough in their organization to be of phylogenetic value to
+the unbiassed zoologist.
+
+As the sworn adversary of Evolution, transformism, and Darwinism in
+particular, but a believer in the constancy of species, the great and
+renowned pathologist has been driven to the incredible contention that
+all variations of organic forms are pathological.
+
+Four years ago, as honorary president of the Anthropological Congress
+at Vienna, he attacked Darwinism in the severest manner, and declared
+that 'man may be as well descended from the elephant or from the sheep
+as from the ape.' Such attacks on the theory of transformism indicate a
+failure to understand the principles of the theory of Evolution and to
+appreciate the significance of palæontology, comparative anatomy, and
+ontogeny.
+
+The thousands of other objections which have been made during the last
+forty years (chiefly by outsiders) may be passed over in silence. They
+do not require serious refutation. In spite of, or perhaps because of,
+these attacks, the theory of Evolution stands established more firmly
+than ever.
+
+It is easy for the outsider to exult over the difficulties which our
+problem implies--difficulties which we who have given our lives to the
+study understand likewise, and try our best not only to bridge over,
+but also to point out. Anyhow, we do not conceal them; while those who
+reject the explanation offered by Evolution make the most of the gaps,
+and pass silently over the far more numerous points favourable to our
+theory.
+
+How fruitful during the last thirty years the astonishing progress in
+our palæontological knowledge has been for our Pithecometra-thesis is
+best shown by a short glance at the growth of our knowledge of fossil
+Primates. Cuvier,[13] the founder of palæontology, continued up to the
+time of his death, in 1832, to assert that fossil remains of monkeys
+and lemurs did not exist. The only skull of a fossil lemuroid which
+he described (namely, Adapis) he declared to be that of an ungulate.
+Not until 1836 were the first fragments of extinct monkeys found in
+India; it was two years later, near Athens, that the skeleton of
+_Mesopithecus penthelicus_ was discovered. Other remains of lemurs were
+found in 1862. But during the last twenty years the number of fossil
+Primates has been augmented by the remarkable discoveries of Gaudry,
+Filhol, Milne Edwards, Seeley, Schlosser, and others in Europe; of
+Marsh, Cope, Osborn, Leidy, Ameghino, in South America; and Forsyth
+Major in Madagascar.[14] These tertiary remains, chiefly of Eocene and
+Miocene date, fill many gaps between existing genera of Primates, and
+afford us quite a clear insight into the phyletic development of this
+order during the millions of years of the Cænozoic age.
+
+ [13] See notes, p. 87.
+
+ [14]
+ F. AMEGHINO: 'Contribucion al conocimiento de los mamíferos
+ de la república Argentina.' In _Actas de la Academia nacional de
+ Sciencias en Cordoba_, 1889.--Another article in _Revista Argentina de
+ Historia natural_. Buenos Aires, 1891.
+
+ A. GAUDRY: 'Animaux fossiles et géologie de l'Attique.'
+ 1862.--'Le Dryopithèque.' _Mém. Soc. géol. de France_:
+ 'Paléontologie.' 1890.
+
+ O. MARSH: 'Introduction and Succession of Vertebrate Life in
+ America.' Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Nashville, 1887.
+
+ H. F. OSBORN: 'The Rise of the Mammalia in North America.'
+ Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Madison, 1893.
+
+ L. RUETIMEYER: 'Ueber die Herkunft unserer Thierwelt,' Basel,
+ 1867.
+
+ C. S. FORSYTH MAJOR: 'Fossil Monkeys from Madagascar.'
+ _Geological Magazine_, 1896.
+
+ M. SCHLOSSER: 'Ueber die Beziehungen der ausgestorbenen
+ Saeugethierfaunen und ihr Verhaeltniss zur Saeugethierfauna der
+ Gegenwart.' Biolog. Centralblatt, 1888.
+
+The most important difference between the two groups of existing
+monkeys is indicated by their dentition. Adult man possesses, like
+all the other Catarrhine Simiæ, thirty-two teeth, whilst the American
+monkeys (the Platyrrhinæ) have thirty-six teeth--namely, one pair of
+premolars more in the upper and lower jaws. Comparative odontology
+leads us to the phylogenetic conclusion that this number has been
+produced by reduction from a still older form with forty-four teeth.
+This typical dental formula (three incisors, one canine, four
+premolars, and three molars, in each half-jaw) is common to all those
+most important older mammals which in the beginning of the Eocene
+period constituted the four large groups of Lemuravida, Condylarthra,
+Esthonychida, and Ictopsida. These are the four ancestral groups
+of the four main orders of Placentalia--namely, of the Primates,
+Ungulata, Rodentia, and Carnassia. They seem to be so closely related
+by their primitive organization that they may be united in one common
+super-order, Prochoriata.
+
+With a considerable degree of probability, we are led to formulate
+the further hypothesis that all the orders of Placentalia--from the
+lowest Prochoriata upwards to man--have descended from some unknown
+common ancestor living in the Cretaceous period, and that this oldest
+placental form originated from some Jurassic group of marsupials.
+
+Among these numerous fossil Lemures which have been discovered within
+the last twenty years, there exist, indeed, all the connecting forms
+of the older series of Primates, all the 'missing links' sought for by
+comparative odontology.
+
+The oldest Lemures of the tertiary age are the Eocene Pachylemures,
+or Hyopsodina. They possess the complete dentition of the
+Prochoriata--namely, forty-four teeth (3.1.4.3/3.1.4.3). Then follow
+the Eocene Palæolemures, or Adapida, with forty teeth, they having lost
+one pair of incisors in each jaw. To these are attached the younger
+Autolemures, or Stenopida, with thirty-six teeth, they thus possessing
+already the same dentition as the Platyrrhinæ. The characteristic
+dentition of the Catarrhinæ is derived from this formula by the loss of
+another premolar.
+
+These relations are so clear and so closely connected with a
+gradual transformation of the whole skull, and with the progressive
+differentiation of the Primate-form, that we are justified in saying
+that the pedigree of the Primates, from the oldest Eocene Lemures
+upwards to man, is now so well known, its principal features so firmly
+fixed within the Tertiary age, that there is no missing link whatever.
+
+Quite different, and much more incomplete, is the palæontological
+evidence, if we go further back into the Secondary or Mesozoic age,
+and look there for the older ancestors of the mammalian series. There
+we meet everywhere with wide gaps, and the scarce fragments of fossil
+Mesozoic mammals (excessively rare in the Cretaceous formation) are too
+poor to permit definite conclusions as to their systematic position.
+Indeed, comparative anatomy and ontogeny lead us to the hypothesis
+that the oldest Cretaceous Mammalia--the Prochoriata--are descended
+from Jurassic marsupials, and these again from Monotremes. We may
+also suppose with high probability that among the unknown Cretaceous
+Prochoriata there have been Lemuravida and forms intermediate between
+these and the Jurassic Amphitheriidæ, and that these marsupials in
+their turn are descendants of Pantotheria or similar monotreme-like
+creatures of the Triassic age. Any certain evidence for these
+hypotheses is at present still wanting. One important fact, however,
+is established--namely, that these interesting and oldest Mammalia--the
+Pantotheria of Marsh, the Triassic Dromatheriidæ, and the Jurassic
+Triconodontidæ of Osborn--were small insectivorous mammals with a very
+primitive organization. Probably they were Monotremes, and may be
+derived directly from Permian Sauromammalia, an ill-defined mixture of
+Mammalia and Reptilia.
+
+This generalized characteristic supports our view that _the whole
+class of Mammalia is monophyletic_, and that all its members, from
+the oldest Monotremes upwards to man, have descended from one common
+ancestor living in the older Triassic, or perhaps in the Permian,
+age. To acquire full conviction of this important conception, we have
+only to think of the hair and the glands of our human skin, of our
+diaphragm, the heart and the blood corpuscles without a nucleus, our
+skull with its squamoso-mandibular articulation. All these singular
+and striking modifications of the vertebrate organization are common
+to mammals, and distinguish them clearly from the other Craniota. This
+characteristic combination and correlation proves that they have been
+developed only _once_ in the history of the vertebrate stem, and that
+they have been transferred by heredity from one common ancestor to all
+the members of the class of Mammalia.
+
+The next step, as we trace our human phylogeny to its origin, leads us
+further back into the lower Vertebrata, into that obscure Palæozoic
+age the immeasurable length of which (much greater than that of the
+Mesozoic) may, according to one of the newest geological calculations,
+have comprised about one thousand millions of years.[15]
+
+ [15] See note, 'Geological Time and Evolution' p. 134.
+
+The first important fact we have to face here is the complete absence
+of mammalian remains. Instead of these we find in the later Palæozoic
+period, the Permian, air-breathing _reptiles_ as the earliest
+representatives of Amniota. They belong to the most primitive order
+of that class, the Tocosauria; and besides them there were the
+Theromorpha, which approach the Mammalia in a remarkable manner. These
+reptiles in turn were preceded, in the Carboniferous period, by true
+Amphibia, most of them belonging to the armour-clad Stegocephali.
+These interesting Progonamphibia were the oldest Tetrapoda, the first
+vertebrates which had adapted themselves to the terrestrial mode of
+life; in them the swimming fin of fishes and Dipneusta was transformed
+into the pentadactyle extremities characteristic of quadrupeds.
+
+To appreciate the high importance of this metamorphosis, we need only
+compare the skeleton of our own human limbs with that of the living
+Amphibia. We find in the latter the same characteristic composition as
+in man: the same shoulder and pelvic girdle; the same single bone, the
+humerus or the femur, followed by the same pair of bones in the forearm
+and leg; then the same skeletal elements composing the wrist and the
+ankle regions; and, lastly, the same five fingers and toes.
+
+The arrangement of these bones, peculiar and often complicated, but
+everywhere essentially the same in all the Tetrapoda, is a striking
+evidence that man is a descendant from the oldest pentadactyle Amphibia
+of the Carboniferous period. In man the pentadactyle type has been
+better preserved by constant heredity than in many other Mammalia,
+notably the Ungulata.
+
+The oldest Carboniferous Amphibia, the armour-clad Stegocephali, and
+especially the remarkable Branchiosauri discovered by Credner, are
+now regarded by all competent zoologists as the indubitable common
+ancestral group of all Tetrapoda, comprising both Amphibia and Amniota.
+But whence this most remote group of Tetrapoda? That difficult question
+is answered by the marvellous progress of modern palæontology, and
+the answer is in complete harmony with the older results arrived
+at by comparative anatomy and ontogeny. Thirty-four years ago Carl
+Gegenbaur,[16] the great living master of comparative anatomy, had
+demonstrated in a series of works how the skeletal parts of the various
+classes of Vertebrata, especially the skull and the limbs, still
+represent a continuous scale of phyletic gradations. Apart from the
+Cyclostomes, there are the fishes, and among them the Elasmobranchi
+(sharks and rays), which have best preserved the original structure in
+all its essential parts of organization. Closely connected with the
+Elasmobranchi are the Crossopterygii, and with these the Dipneusta or
+Dipnoi. Among the latter the highest importance attaches to the ancient
+Australian Ceratodus. Its organization and development is now, at last,
+becoming well known. This transitional group of Dipnoi, 'fishes with
+lungs' but without pentadactyle limbs, is the morphological bridge
+which joins the Ganoids and the oldest Amphibia. With this chain
+of successive groups of Vertebrata, constructed anatomically, the
+palæontological facts agree most satisfactorily. Selachians and Ganoids
+existed in the Silurian times, Dipnoi in the Devonian, Amphibia in the
+Carboniferous, Reptilia in the Permian, Mammalia in the Trias. These
+are historical facts of first rank. They connote in the most convincing
+manner that remarkable ascending scale in the series of vertebrates
+for our knowledge of which we are indebted to the works of Cuvier and
+Blainville, Meckel, Johannes Mueller and Gegenbaur, Owen and Huxley.
+The historical succession of the classes and orders of the Vertebrata
+in the course of untold millions of years is definitely fixed by the
+concordance of those leading works, and this invaluable acquisition is
+much more important for the foundation of our human pedigree than would
+be a complete series of all possible skeletons of Primates.
+
+ [16] See note, p. 97.
+
+Greater and more frequent difficulties arise if we penetrate further
+into the most remote part of the human phylogeny, and attempt to derive
+the vertebrate stem from an older stem of invertebrate ancestors. None
+of those had a skeleton which could be petrified; and the same remark
+applies to the lowest classes of Vertebrata--to the Cyclostomes and
+the Acrania. Palæontology, therefore, can tell us nothing about them;
+and we are limited to the other two great documents of phylogeny--the
+results of comparative anatomy and ontogeny. The value of their
+evidence is, however, so great that every competent zoologist can
+perceive the most important features of the most remote portion of our
+phylogeny.
+
+Here the first place belongs to the invaluable results which modern
+comparative ontogeny has gained by the aid of the biogenetic law or
+the theory of recapitulation. The foundation-stones of vertebrate
+embryology had been laid by the works of Von Baer, Bischoff,[17] Remak,
+and Koelliker;[18] but the clearest light was thrown upon it by the
+famous discoveries of Kowalevsky[19] in 1866. He proved the identity
+of the first developmental stages of Amphioxus and the Ascidians, and
+thereby confirmed the divination of Goodsir, who had already announced
+the close affinity of Vertebrates and Tunicates. The acknowledgment of
+this affinity has proved of increasing importance, and has abolished
+the erroneous hypothesis that the Vertebrata may have arisen from
+Annelids or from other Articulata. Meanwhile, from 1860 to 1872, I
+myself had been studying the development of the Spongiæ, Medusæ,
+Siphonophora, and other Coelenterata. Their comparison led me to the
+statements embodied in the 'Gastræatheorie,' the first abstract of
+which was published in 1872 in my monograph of the Calcispongiæ.
+
+ [17] Wilhelm Bischoff of Munich: works on the history of the
+ development of the rabbit, dog, guinea-pig, roe-deer. 1840-1854.
+
+ [18] See note, p. 96.
+
+ [19] 'Ueber die Entwicklung der einfachen Ascidien,' Mém. Acad. St.
+ Petersbourg, vii. ser., tome x. (1866). Other papers in 'Archiv f.
+ Mikroskop. Anatomie,' vii. (1871); xiii. (1877).
+
+These ideas were carried on and expanded during the subsequent ten
+years by the help of many excellent embryologists--first of all by E.
+Ray Lankester and Francis Balfour. The most fruitful result of these
+widely extended researches was the conclusion that the first stages of
+embryonic development are essentially the same in all the different
+Metazoa, and that we may derive from these facts certain views on
+the common descent of all from one ancestral form. The unicellular
+egg[20] repeats the stage of our Protozoan ancestors; the Blastula
+is equivalent to an ancestral coenobium of Magosphæra or Volvox;
+the Gastrula is the hereditary repetition of the Gastræa, the common
+ancestor of all the Metazoa.
+
+ [20] See note, p. 115--Theory of cells.
+
+Man agrees in all these respects with the other vertebrates, and must
+have descended with them from the same common root.
+
+Particularly obscure is that part of our phylogeny which extends from
+the Gastræa to Amphioxus. The morphological importance of this last
+small creature had been perceived by Johannes Mueller, who in 1842
+gave the first accurate description of it. It would not, of course, be
+correct to proclaim the modern Amphioxus the common ancestor of all the
+vertebrates; but he must be regarded as closely related to them, and
+as the only survivor of the whole class of Acrania. If the Amphioxidæ
+had through some unfortunate accident become extinct, we should not
+have been able to gain anything like a positive glimpse at our most
+remote vertebrate ancestor. On the one hand, Amphioxus is closely
+connected with the early larva of the Cyclostomes, which are the
+oldest Craniota, and the pre-Silurian ancestors of the fishes. On the
+other hand, the ontogeny of Amphioxus is in harmony with that of the
+Ascidians, and if this agreement is not merely coincidental, but due to
+relationship, we are justified in reconstructing for both Ascidians
+and Amphioxus one common ancestral group of chordate animals, the
+hypothetical _Prochordonia_. The modern Copelata give us a remote idea
+of their structure. The curious Balanoglossus, the only living form of
+Enteropneusta, seems to connect these Prochordonia with the Nemertina
+and other Vermalia, which we unite in one large class--Frontonia.
+
+No doubt these pre-Cambrian Vermalia, and the common root of all
+Metazoa, the Gastræades, were connected during the Laurentian period
+by a long chain of intermediate forms, and probably among these
+were some older forms of Rotatoria and Turbellaria; but at present
+it is not possible to fill this wide gap with hypotheses that are
+satisfactory, and we have to admit that here indeed are many missing
+links in the older history of the Invertebrata. Still, every zoologist
+who is convinced of the truth of transformism, and is accustomed to
+phylogenetic speculations, knows very well that their results are most
+unequal, often incomplete.
+
+
+
+
+III.
+
+
+Let us now recapitulate the ancestral chain of man, as it is set forth
+in the accompanying diagram (p. 55), which represents our present
+knowledge of our descent. For simplicity's sake the many side-issues
+or branches which lead to groups not in the main line of our descent
+have been left out, or have been indicated merely. Many of the stages
+are of course hypothetical, arrived at by the study of comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny; but an example for each of them has been taken
+from those living or fossil creatures which seem to be their nearest
+representatives.
+
+1. The most remote ancestors of all living organisms were living beings
+of the simplest imaginable kind, organisms without organs, like
+the still existing _Monera_. Each consisted of a simple granule of
+protoplasm, a structureless mass of albuminous matter or plasson, like
+the recent Chromaceæ and Bacteriæ. The morphological value of these
+beings is not yet that of a cell, but that of a cytode, or cell without
+a nucleus. Cytoplasm and nucleus were still undifferentiated.
+
+I assume that the first Monera owe their existence to spontaneous
+creation out of so-called anorganic combinations, consisting of carbon,
+hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. An explanation of this hypothesis I
+have given in my 'Generelle Morphologie.'
+
+The Monera probably arose early in the Laurentian period. The oldest
+are the Phytomonera, with vegetable metabolism. They possessed the
+power (characteristic of plants) of forming albumin by synthesis from
+carbon, water, and ammonia. From some of these plasma-forming Monera
+arose the plasmophagous Zoomonera with animal metabolism, living
+directly upon the produce of their plasmodomous or plasma-forming
+sisters. This is the first instance of the great principle of division
+of labour.
+
+2. The second stage is that of the _simple and single cell_, a bit
+of protoplasm with a nucleus. Such unicellular organisms are still
+very common. The _Amoebæ_ are their simplest representatives. The
+morphological value of such beings is the same as that of the egg
+of any animal. The naked egg cells of the sponges creep about in an
+amoeboid fashion, scarcely distinguishable from Amoeba. The same
+remark applies to the egg-cell of man himself in its early stages
+before it is enclosed in a membrane. The first unicellular organisms
+arose from Monera through differentiation of the inner nucleus from the
+outer protoplasm.
+
+3. Repeated division of the unicellular organism produces the
+_Synamoebium_, or community of Amoebæ, provided the divisional
+products, or new generations of the original cell, do not scatter,
+but remain together. The existence of such a _Coenobium_, a number
+of equal and only loosely-connected cells, as a separate stage in the
+ancestral history of animals, is made highly probable by the fact that
+the eggs of all animals undergo after fertilization such a process of
+repeated self-division, or 'cleavage,' until the single egg cell is
+transformed into a heap of cells closely packed together, not unlike a
+mulberry (_morula_)--hence _morula_ stage in ontogeny.
+
+4. The morula of most animals further changes into a _Blastula_, a
+hollow ball filled with fluid, the wall being formed by a single layer
+of cells, the blastoderm or germinal layer. This modification is
+brought about by the action of the cells--they conveying nourishing
+fluid into the interior of the whole cell colony and thereby
+being themselves forced towards the surface. The Blastula of most
+Invertebrata, and even that of Amphioxus, is possessed of fine ciliæ,
+or hair-like processes, the vibrating motion of which causes the whole
+organism to rotate and advance in the water. Living representatives of
+such Blastæads, namely, globular gelatinous colonies of cells enclosing
+a cavity, are Volvox and Magosphæra.
+
+5. The Blastula of most animals assumes a new larval form called
+_Gastrula_, in which the essential characteristics are that a portion
+of the blastoderm by invagination converts the Blastula into a cup
+with double walls, enclosing a new cavity, the primitive gut. This
+invagination or bulging-in obliterates the original inner cavity of
+the Blastula. The outer layer of the Gastrula is the ectoderm, the
+inner the endoderm; both pass into each other at the blastoporus, or
+opening of the gut cavity. The Gastrula is a stage in the embryonic
+development of the various great groups of animals, and some such
+primitive form as ancestral to all Metazoa is thus indicated. This
+hypothetical _Gastræa_ is still very essentially represented by the
+lower Coelenterates--_e.g._, Olynthus, Hydra.
+
+6. The sixth stage--that of the _Platodes_, or flat-worms--is very
+hypothetical. They are bilateral gastræads, with a flattened oblong
+body, furnished with ciliæ, with a primitive nervous system, simple
+sensory and reproductive organs, but still without appendages, body
+cavity, vent, and blood-vessels. The nearest living representatives of
+such creatures are the acoelous Turbellarians--_e.g._, Convoluta, a
+free-swimming, ciliated creature.
+
+7. The next higher stage is represented by such low animals as the
+_Gastrotricha_--_e.g._, Chætonotus among the Rotatoria, which differ
+from the rhabdocoelous Turbellarians chiefly by the formation of
+a vent and the beginnings of a coelom, or cavity, between gut and
+body wall. The addition of a primitive vascular system and a pair of
+nephridia, or excretory organs, is first met with in the _Nemertines_.
+
+8. These, together with the _Enteropneusta_ (Balanoglossus), are
+comprised under the name of Frontonia, or Rhynchelminthes, and form the
+highest group of the Vermalia.
+
+The Enteropneusta especially fix our attention, because they alone,
+although essentially 'worms,' exhibit certain characteristics which
+make it possible to bridge over the gulf which still separates the
+Invertebrata from the vertebrate phylum. The anterior portion of the
+gut is transformed into a breathing apparatus--hence Gegenbaur's
+term of Enteropneusta, or Gut-breathers. Moreover, Balanoglossus and
+Cephalodiscus possess another modification of the gut--namely, a
+peculiar diverticulum, which, in the present state of our knowledge,
+may be looked upon as the forerunner of the chorda dorsalis.
+
+9. Stage of _Prochordonia_, as indicated by the larval form, called
+Chordula, which is common to the Tunicata and all the Vertebrata.
+These two groups possess three most important features: (_a_) A chorda
+dorsalis, a stiff rod lying in the long axis of the body, dorsally from
+the gut and below the central nervous system. This latter, for the
+first time in the animal kingdom, appears in the shape of a spinal
+cord. (_b_) The use of the anterior portion of the gut for respiratory
+purposes. (_c_) The larval development of the Tunicata is essentially
+the same as that of the Vertebrata in its early stages. Only the
+free-swimming Copelata or Appendicularia among the Tunicates retain
+most of these features. The others, which become sessile--namely, the
+Ascidiæ, or sea-squirts--degenerate and specialize away from the main
+line.
+
+10. Stage of the _Acrania_, represented by Amphioxus. The early
+development of this little marine creature agrees closely with
+that of the Tunicates; but one important feature is added to its
+organization--namely, metamerism, segmentally arranged mesoderm.
+Amphioxus still possesses neither skull nor vertebræ, neither ribs
+nor jaws, and no limbs. But it is a member of the Vertebrata if we
+define these as follows: Bilateral symmetrical animals with segmentally
+arranged mesoderm, with a chorda dorsalis between the tubular nervous
+system and the gut, and with respiratory organs which arise from the
+anterior portion of the gut. We do not assume that Amphioxus stands
+in the direct ancestral line; it is probably much specialized, partly
+degenerated, and represents a side-branch; but it is, nevertheless,
+the only creature, hitherto known, which satisfactorily connects the
+Vertebrata with their invertebrate ancestors. Many other efforts have
+been made to solve the mystery of the origin of the Vertebrata--all
+less satisfactory than the present suggestion, or even absolutely
+futile. This remark applies especially to the attempts to derive them
+from either Articulata or Echinoderms. The other great and highly
+developed phylum, the Mollusca, is quite out of the question. We have
+to go back to a level at which all these principal phyla meet, and
+there we find the Vermalia, the lower of which alone permit connection
+in an upward direction with the higher phyla.
+
+ ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE VERTEBRATA.
+
+ _Abridged from 'Systemat. Phylogenie,' § 15._
+
+ Names underlined refer to hypothetical groups.
+
+ _Mammalia_
+ _Aves_ |
+ | _Reptilia_ |
+ | | |
+ +----------------+ |
+ | |
+ +--------------+
+ |
+ _Proreptilia_
+ | _Amphibia_
+ _Pisces_ | |
+ | | +----------+
+ | | |
+ | | | _Dipnoi_
+ | _Stegocephali_ |
+ | | |
+ | +---------------+
+ | |
+ +---------------+
+ | _Cyclostomata_
+ _Proselachii_ |
+ | |
+ _Tunicata_ | +--------+
+ | | |
+ | *_Archicrania_*
+ | | _Acrania_
+ | | |
+ | *_Prospondylia_*------+
+ | |
+ +----------+ |
+ | |
+ *_Prochordonia_*
+
+
+11. Stage of _Cyclostomata_. This now small group of Lampreys and
+Hagfishes represents the lowest Craniota; and although much specialized
+as a side-branch of the main-stem from which the other Craniota have
+sprung, they give us an idea of what the direct ancestors of the latter
+must have been like:--still without visceral arches, without jaws and
+without paired limbs; with a persistent pronephros; the ear with one
+semicircular canal only; mouth suctorial; cranium very primitive;
+and the metamerism of the vertebral column indicated only by little
+blocks of cartilage in the perichordal sheath. Such creatures must
+have existed at least as early as the Lower Silurian epoch; but until
+1890 fossil Cyclostomes were unknown. Their life in the mud, or as
+endoparasites of fishes, coupled with their soft structure, makes them
+very unfit for preservation. This gives all the greater importance to
+Traquair's discovery, in 1890, of many little creatures, called by him
+_Palæospondylus gunni_, in the Old Red Sandstone of Caithness, which
+seem to be very closely allied to Cyclostomata.
+
+12. The _Elasmobranchi_ (sharks and skates), with their immediate
+forerunners, the Acanthodi of the Devonian and Carboniferous age,
+are the first typical fishes. That they existed as far back as the
+Silurian age is proved by many enamelled spines of the dermal armour,
+chiefly from the dorsal fins. This higher stage is characterized by the
+possession of typical jaws, by visceral or gill-bearing arches, and by
+two pairs of limbs. None of the Elasmobranchs, fossil or recent, stands
+in the direct ancestral line; but they are the lowest Gnathostomata,
+jaw-and-limb-possessing creatures, known.
+
+13. Closely connected with the Elasmobranchs in a wider sense are the
+_Crossopterygii_, which begin in the Devonian age as a large group, but
+have left only two survivals, the African Polypterus and Calamoichthys.
+They are possessed of dermal bones and other ossifications, and are
+characterized by their lobate paired fins, which have a thick axis
+beset with biserial fin rays. Their gill-clefts are covered by an
+operculum, and they have a well-developed air-bladder. Whilst they
+are in many respects more highly developed than the Elasmobranchs,
+and are intimately connected with the typical Ganoids and other
+bony fishes (all of which form a great, manifold side-branch of the
+general vertebrate stem), they stand in many other respects (notably,
+the structure of the paired fins, the vertebral column, and the
+air-bladder) nearer the main-stem of our own ancestral line.
+
+14. This is shown by their intimate relation to the _Dipnoi_, which
+are still represented by the Australian, African, and South American
+mud-fishes: Ceratodus, Protopterus, and Lepidosiren. The genus
+Ceratodus existed in the Upper Trias, whence various other unmistakably
+dipnoous forms lead down through the Carboniferous (_e.g._, Ctenodus)
+to the Devonian strata--_e.g._, Dipterus. They are characterized as
+follows: The paired fins still retain the archipterygial form (namely,
+one axis with biserial rays); the heart is already trilocular, and
+receives blood which is mixed arterial and venous, owing to the gills
+being retained, while the air-bladder has been modified into a lung. In
+fact, the generalized Dipnoi form the actual link between fishes and
+_Amphibia_.
+
+15. _Amphibia._ The earliest amphibian fossils occur in
+the Carboniferous strata. They alone--the Stegocephali or
+Phractamphibia--stand in the ancestral line, while the Lissamphibia, to
+which all the recent forms belong, are side-branches. The Stegocephali
+are the earliest Tetrapoda, the archipterygial paired fins having been
+transformed into the pentadactyle fore and hind limbs, which are so
+characteristic of all the higher Vertebrata. The cranium is roofed
+over by dermal bones, of which, besides others, supra-occipitals,
+supra-orbitals, and supra-temporals are always present. The lowest
+members (Branchiosauri) still retained gills besides the lungs, while
+others (Microsauri) have lost the gills. Be it remembered that all
+the recent Amphibia still undergo the same metamorphosis during their
+ontogenetic development.
+
+In the very important Temnospondyli, a subgroup of the
+Stegocephali--_e.g._, Trimerorhachis of the Lower Red Sandstone or
+Lower Permian--the component cartilaginous or bony units which compose
+the vertebræ still remained in a separate, unfused state, showing at
+the same time an arrangement whence has arisen that which is typical
+of the Amniota. The same applies to the limbs and their girdles. In
+fact, the Stegocephali, taken as a whole, lead imperceptibly to the
+_Proreptilia_.
+
+16. _Proreptilia_ are represented by the Permian genera Eryops and
+Cricotus. Until quite recently these and many other fossils from
+the Carboniferous strata were looked upon as Amphibia, while many
+undoubted fossil Amphibia were mistaken for reptiles, as indicated by
+the frequent termination '-saurus' in their names.
+
+The nearest living representative of these extinct Proreptilia is
+the New Zealand reptile Hatteria, or Sphenodon, close relations
+of which are known from the Upper Trias; while others--_e.g._,
+Palæohatteria--have been discovered in the Permian. Anyhow, Sphenodon
+is the reptile which stands nearest to the main stem of our ancestry.
+
+The most important characteristics of the Reptilia, which mark a higher
+stage or level, are (1) The entire suppression of the gills--although
+during the embryonic development the gill-clefts still appear in all
+reptiles, birds, and mammals; (2) The development of an amnion and an
+allantois, both for the embryonic life only, but so characteristic
+that all these animals are comprised under the name of Amniota;
+(3) The articulation of the skull with the first neck vertebræ by
+well-developed condyles, either single (really triple) or double (such
+a condylar arrangement begins with the Amphibia, but only the two
+lateral condyles are developed, while the middle portion, belonging to
+the basi-occipital element, remains rudimentary[21]); (4) The formation
+of centra, or bodies of the vertebræ, mainly by a ventral pair of the
+original quadruple constituents, or arcualia.
+
+ [21] Similar conditions seem to have prevailed among the Proreptilia;
+ but in those of their descendants which have specialized into Reptiles
+ and Birds the basi-occipital element becomes more and more predominant
+ in that formation which ultimately leads to the apparently single
+ condyle. Hence it is misleading to divide the Tetrapoda into the two
+ main groups of Amphi-and Mono-condylia, and therefrom to conclude that
+ the two-condyled Mammalia are more closely related to the likewise
+ amphicondylous Amphibia than to the so-called monocondylous Reptiles.
+
+17. Between the Proreptilia and the Mammalia, which latter occur in
+the Upper Triassic epoch, we have necessarily to intercalate a group
+of very low reptiles, which are still so generalized that their
+descendants could branch off either into the Reptilia proper or into
+the Mammalia. The changes concerned chiefly the brain and the heart;
+of the skeleton, the skull and the pelvis; and, of the tegumentary
+structures, the formation of a hairy covering. Many such creatures
+existed in the Triassic epoch--namely, the _Theromorpha_--some of which
+indeed possess so many characteristics which otherwise occur in the
+Mammalia only, that these creatures have been termed _Sauro-Mammalia_.
+However, it has to be emphasized that none of the Theromorpha hitherto
+discovered fulfils all the requirements which would entitle them to
+this important linking position. They only give us an approximate idea
+of what this link was like.
+
+18. Stage of the _Promammalia_, or _Prototheria_. The only surviving
+members are the famous duck-bill, Ornithorhynchus, and the spiny
+ant-eaters, Echidna and Proechidna, of the Australian region. These
+few genera, however, differ so much from one another in various
+important respects that they cannot but be remnants of an originally
+much larger group. Indeed, many fossils from the Upper Triassic and
+from the Jurassic strata have without much doubt to be referred to the
+Prototheria. The Prototheria are typical mammals, because they possess
+the following characteristics: The heart is completely quadrilocular;
+the blood is warm, and its red corpuscles have, owing to the loss
+of their nucleus, been modified from biconvex into biconcave discs;
+they have a hairy coat and sweat glands, and two occipital condyles;
+the ilio-sacral connection is preacetabular; the ankle-joint is
+cruro-tarsal; the quadrate bone of the Reptilia has ceased to carry the
+under jaw, which now articulates directly with the squamosal portion
+of the skull. Their low position is shown by the retention of the
+following reptilian features: Complete coracoid bones and a T-shaped
+interclavicle; a cloaca, or common chamber for the passage of the
+fæces, the genital and the urinary products; they are still oviparous;
+the embryo develops without a chorion, and is therefore not nourished
+through a placenta. Even the milk glands, which are absolutely
+peculiar to the Mammalia, are still in a very primitive stage, and do
+not yet produce milk proper; and there is only a temporary shallow
+marsupium.
+
+19. Stage of _Metatheria_, or _Marsupialia_, are direct descendants of
+Prototheria; but they show higher development by the reduction of the
+coracoid bones and the interclavicle. The original cloaca is divided
+into a rectal chamber and a uro-genital sinus, completely separated,
+at least in the males; they are viviparous; the young are received
+into a permanent marsupium, in the walls of which are formed typical
+milk glands and nipples, but the embryo is still devoid of a placenta,
+although some recent marsupials show indications of such an organ. The
+corpus callosum in the brain is still very weak.
+
+Most of the marsupials are extinct. They occur from the Upper Trias
+onwards, and had in the Jurassic epoch attained a wide distribution
+both in Europe and in America. Since the Tertiary epoch they have
+been restricted to America and to the Australian region, and are now
+represented by about 150 species.
+
+20. Stage of _Prochoriata_, or early _Placentalia_: a further
+development of the Metatheria by the development of a placenta, loss
+of the marsupium and the marsupial bones, complete division by the
+perineum of the anal and uro-genital chambers, stronger development of
+the corpus callosum, or chief commissure of the two hemispheres of the
+brain.
+
+Placentalia must have come into existence during the Cretaceous
+epoch. Up to that time all the Mammalia seem to have belonged to
+either Prototheria or to Metatheria; but in the early Eocene we can
+distinguish the main groups of Placentalia--namely, (1) Trogontia, now
+represented by the rodents; (2) Edentata, or sloths, armadilloes, etc.;
+(3) Carnassia, or Insectivora and Carnivora; (4) Chiroptera, or bats;
+(5) Cetomorpha, or whales and dugongs; (6) Ungulata; (7) Primates.
+Of these groups, the first and second, third and fourth, fifth and
+sixth, can perhaps, to judge from palæontological evidence, be combined
+into three greater groups, as indicated by the fossil Esthonychida,
+Ictopsida, and Condylarthra, in addition to the ancestral Primates,
+or Lemuravida, as the fourth large branch of the ancestral-tree where
+this has reached the placental level. Among none of the first three
+branches can we look for the ancestors of the Primates. The Lemuravida,
+therefore, represent a branch equivalent to the three other branches.
+
+21. Stage of _Lemures_, or _Prosimiæ_, comprising the older members of
+the Primates, consequently approaching most nearly to the Lemuravida.
+The limbs are modified into pentadactyle hands and feet of the arboreal
+type, and are protected by nails. The dentition is of the frugivorous
+or omnivorous type, with an originally complete series of teeth, with
+milk teeth and with permanent. The orbit is surrounded by a complete
+bony ring, posteriorly by a fronto-jugal arch, but still widely
+communicating with the temporal fossa. The placenta is diffuse and
+non-deciduous.
+
+ ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE MAMMALIA.
+
+ _'Systematische Phylogenie,' § 386._
+
+ _Perissodactyla_ _Homo_ _Carnivora_
+ | (_Litopterna_) | | _Pinnipedia_
+ | | | | |
+ +-------+ _Anthropoidae_ +------+
+ _Artiodactyla_ | | |
+ | | | _Carnassia_
+ +----------+ _Catarhinæ_ |
+ | | _Chiroptera_ |
+ _Proboscidea_ | | | _Insectivora_ |
+ | | _Platyrhinæ_ | | |
+ (_Amblypoda_) | | | | +-------+
+ | | | | | | _Rodentia_
+ +-------+ | _Simiæ_ +-------+ |
+ | | | | (_Tillodontia_)
+ +--+ | | |
+ _Cetacea_ | | | _Trogontia_
+ | _Sirenia_ | _Lemures_ _*Ictopsales*_ | _Edentata_
+ | | | | | | |
+ _Cetomorpha_ | _Hyracoidea_ | | _*Esthonychales*_
+ | | | | | |
+ +---_?_---+------+ | | |
+ | _*Lemuravidæ*_ | |
+ _*Condylarthrales*_ | +-------+ |
+ | | | |
+ +--------Eutheria s. Placentalia------------------+
+ |
+ | _Marsupialia polyprotodontia_
+ _Marsupialia diprotodontia_ | |
+ | | |
+ +-------------Metatheria--------------+
+ |
+ | _Monotremata_
+ | | (_Allotheria_)
+ | | |
+ | +-----------------+
+ | |
+ Prototheria-----+
+ |
+ |
+ _*Hypotheria s.*_ _*Promammalia*_
+
+ _Names in brackets indicate extinct groups.
+ Names *underlined* indicate hypothetical groups or combinations._
+
+22. Stage of _Simiæ_. Orbit completely separated from the temporal
+fossa by an inward extension of the frontal and malar bones meeting the
+alisphenoid. Placenta consolidated into a disc, and with a maternal
+deciduous portion. Mammæ pectoral only. The dental formula is 2.1.3.3.
+All the fingers and toes are protected by flat nails. The tail is long.
+The American prehensile-tailed monkeys are a lower side-branch.
+
+23. Stage of _Catarrhinæ Cercopithecidæ_. The dental formula is
+2.1.2.3, owing to the loss of one pair of premolars in each jaw.
+The frontal and alisphenoid bones are in contact, separating the
+parietal from the malar bone; this feature is correlated with the
+enlarged brain. The internarial septum is narrow, and the nostrils
+look forwards and downwards instead of sidewards--hence the term
+'Catarrhinæ.' The external auditory meatus is long and bony. The tail
+is long, with the exception of _Macacus inuus_. The body is covered
+with a thick coat of furry hair. Catarrhine monkeys have existed, we
+know with certainty, since the Miocene.
+
+24. Stage of _Catarrhinæ Anthropoidæ_, or _Apes_. Now represented by
+the large apes--namely, the Hylobates or gibbon of South-Eastern Asia,
+_Simia satyrus_, the orang-utan of Sumatra and Borneo, _Troglodytes
+gorilla_, _T. niger_ and _T. calvus_, the gorilla and the chimpanzees
+from Western Equatorial Africa. Of fossils are to be mentioned
+Pliopithecus and Dryopithecus from European Miocene, and _Troglodytes
+sivalensis_ from the Pliocene of the Punjaub. The tail is reduced
+to a few caudal vertebræ, which are transformed into a coccyx, not
+visible externally; but in the embryos of apes and man the tail is
+still a conspicuous feature. The walk is semierect; in adaptation
+to the prevailing arboreal life, the arms are longer than the legs.
+The hair of the body is considerably more scanty than in the tailed
+monkeys. _Troglodytes calvus_, a species or variety of chimpanzee, is
+bald-headed. None of the recent genera of apes can lay claim to a place
+in the ancestry of mankind.
+
+25. Stage of _Pithecanthropi_. Hitherto the only known representative
+is _Pithecanthropus erectus_, from the Upper Pliocene of Java. In
+adaptation to a more erect gait, the legs have become stronger and the
+hind-hand has been turned into a flat-soled walking 'foot.' The brain
+is considerably enlarged. Presumably it is still devoid of so-called
+articulate speech; this is indicated by the fact that children have
+to learn the language of their parents, and by the circumstance that
+comparative philology declares it impossible to reduce the chief human
+languages to anything like one common origin.
+
+26. _Man._ Known with certainty to have existed as an implement-using
+creature in the last Glacial epoch. His probable origin cannot,
+therefore, have been later than the beginning of the Plistocene. The
+place of origin was probably somewhere in Southern Asia.
+
+Whilst we have to admit that there are great defects in the older
+(invertebrate) portion of our pedigree, we have all the more reason to
+be satisfied with the positive results of our investigation of the more
+recent (vertebrate) part of it. All modern researches have confirmed
+the views of Lamarck, Darwin, and Huxley, and they allow of no doubt
+that the nearest vertebrate ancestors of mankind were a series of
+Tertiary Primates.
+
+Particularly valuable are the admirable attempts of the two zoologists,
+Paul and Fritz Sarasin,[22] to throw light upon the human phylogeny by
+painstaking comparison of all the skeletal parts of man with those of
+the anthropoid apes. They have shown that among the lower races of man
+the primitive Veddahs of Ceylon approach the apes most nearly, and that
+among the latter the chimpanzee stands nearest to man.
+
+ [22] 'Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf Ceylon,' vols.
+ 4 and 5. (With an atlas of 84 plates; 1893.)
+
+The direct descent of man from some extinct ape-like form is now beyond
+doubt, and admits of being traced much more clearly than the origin
+of many another mammalian order. The pedigrees of the Elephants, the
+Sirenia, the Cetacea, and, above all, of the Edentata, for example,
+are much more obscure and difficult to explain. In many parts of their
+organization--for example, in the number and structure of his five
+digits and toes--man and monkeys have remained much more primitive than
+most of the Ungulata.
+
+The immense significance of this positive knowledge of the origin of
+man from some Primate does not require to be enforced. Its bearing
+upon the highest questions of philosophy cannot be exaggerated. Among
+modern philosophers no one has perceived this more deeply than Herbert
+Spencer.[23] He is one of those older thinkers who before Darwin were
+convinced that the theory of development is the only way to solve
+the 'enigma of the world.' Spencer is also the champion of those
+evolutionists who lay the greatest weight upon _progressive heredity_,
+or the much combated _heredity of acquired characters_. From the first
+he has severely attacked and criticised the theories of Weismann, who
+denies this most important factor of phylogeny, and would explain
+the whole of transformism by the 'all-sufficiency of selection.' In
+England the theories of Weismann were received with enthusiastic
+acclamation, much more so than on the Continent, and they were called
+'Neo-Darwinism,' in opposition to the older conception of Evolution,
+or 'Neo-Lamarckism.' Neither of those expressions is correct. Darwin
+himself was convinced of the fundamental importance of progressive
+heredity quite as much as his great predecessor Lamarck; as were also
+Huxley and Spencer.
+
+ [23] 'Principles of Biology': 'The Factors of Organic Evolution'; 'The
+ Inadequacy of Natural Selection.'
+
+Three times I had the good fortune to visit Darwin at Down, and on each
+occasion we discussed this fundamental question in complete harmony.
+I agree with Spencer in the conviction that progressive heredity is
+an indispensable factor in every true monistic theory of Evolution,
+and that it is one of its most important elements. If one denies with
+Weismann the heredity of acquired characters, then it becomes necessary
+to have recourse to purely mystical qualities of germ-plasm. I am of
+the opinion of Spencer, that in that case it would be better to accept
+a mysterious creation of all the various species as described in the
+Mosaic account.
+
+If we look at the results of modern anthropogeny from the highest point
+of view, and compare all its empirical arguments, we are justified in
+affirming that _the descent of man from an extinct Tertiary series of
+Primates is not a vague hypothesis, but an historical fact_.
+
+Of course, this fact cannot be proved _exactly_. We cannot explain all
+the innumerable physical and chemical processes, all the physiological
+mutations, which have led during untold millions of years from the
+simplest Monera and from the unicellular Protista upwards to the
+chimpanzee and to man. But the same consideration applies to all
+historical facts. We all believe that Aristotle, Cæsar, and King Alfred
+did live; but it is impossible to give a proof within the meaning of
+modern exact science. We believe firmly in the former existence of
+these and other great heroes of thought, because we know well the works
+they have left behind them, and we see their effects in the history
+of human culture. These indirect arguments do not furnish stronger
+evidence than those of our history as vertebrates. We know of many
+Jurassic mammals only a single bone, the under jaw. We all believe that
+these mammals possessed also an upper jaw, a skull, and other bones.
+But the so-called 'exact school,' which regards the transformation of
+species as a hypothesis not proven, must suppose that the mandibula was
+the only bone in the body of these curious animals.
+
+Looking forward to the twentieth century, I am convinced that it will
+universally accept our theory of descent, and that future science
+will regard it as the greatest advance made in our time. I have no
+doubt that the influence of the study of anthropogeny upon all other
+branches of science will be fruitful and auspicious. The work done in
+the present century by Lamarck and Darwin will in all future times be
+considered one of the greatest conquests made by thinking man.
+
+ EVOLUTIONARY STAGES OF THE PRINCIPAL GROUPS OF VERTEBRATA.[24]
+
+ STAGES OF THE CLASSES. STAGES OF THE HEART.
+ PAIRED LIMBS.
+
+ { 1. _Acrania._ I. _Leptocardia._
+ I. _Adactylia_ { Cold-blooded; heart
+ s. _Impinnata_. { with one chamber;
+ Without jaws { without lungs.
+ and limbs. {
+ { 2. _Cyclostomata._ } II. _Ichthyocardia._
+ } Cold-blooded; heart
+ } two-chambered, with
+ } one atrium and one
+ } ventricle; heart
+ } containing venous
+ } blood only; without
+ II. _Polydactylia_ { 3. _Pisces._ } lungs.
+ s. _Pinnata_. {
+ With two { } III. _Amphicardia._
+ pairs of fins. { 4. _Dipnoi._ } Cold-blooded; heart
+ } with three complete
+ } chambers, namely, with
+ } two atria and one
+ } ventricle, or (Reptilia)
+ { 5. _Amphibia._ } two ventricles with still
+ { } incomplete septum; heart
+ { } containing mixed venous
+ { } and arterialized
+ III. _Pentadactylia_ { 6. _Reptilia._ } blood; with lungs.
+ s. _Tetrapoda_. {
+ With two pairs { { IV. _Thermocardia._
+ of pentadactyle { { Warm-blooded; heart
+ limbs (unless { 7. _Aves._ { with four complete
+ they have { { chambers, namely, two
+ been lost by { { auricles and two
+ reduction). { { ventricles; right half
+ { { of the heart with venous,
+ { { left half with
+ { { arterialized, blood; with
+ { 8. _Mammalia._ { lungs.
+
+
+ [24] Abridged from Haeckel's 'Systematische Phylogenie der
+ Vertebraten,' § 14.
+
+
+
+
+ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES
+
+
+JEAN BAPTISTE DE MONET, CHEVALIER DE LAMARCK, was born on
+August 1, 1744, in Picardy, where his father owned land. Originally
+educated for the Church, he soon enlisted, and distinguished himself
+in active service. Owing to an accident affecting his health, the
+young Lieutenant gave up the military career, and, without means,
+studied medicine and natural sciences at Paris. In 1778 appeared his
+'Flore française.' In 1793 he was appointed to a Chair of Zoology at
+the newly-formed Musée d'Histoire Naturelle. He had the misfortune to
+become gradually blind, and the last years of his life were spent amid
+straitened circumstances. He died in 1829.
+
+In 1794 Lamarck divided the whole animal kingdom into vertebrate and
+invertebrate animals, and founded successively the groups of Crustacea,
+Arachnida, Annelida, and Radiata. Between 1816 and 1822 he published
+his celebrated 'Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres.'
+
+His most famous work is the 'Philosophie zoologique,' 1809.
+
+Assuming the spontaneous origin of life, he propounded the doctrine
+that all animals and plants have arisen from low forms through
+incessant modifications and changes. In this respect he was in absolute
+opposition to Cuvier, who upheld the immutability of species, and did
+his best by absolute silence to suppress the spread of the new doctrine.
+
+Lamarck has explained his views of transformism chiefly in the seventh
+chapter of the first volume of his 'Philosophie zoologique.'
+
+Organisms strive to accommodate or adapt themselves to new
+circumstances, or to satisfy new requirements--_e.g._, climate, mode
+of procuring food, escape from enemies. The continued function of
+parts of an organism changes the old and produces new organs. The
+acquirements are inherited by the offspring, and thus are produced the
+more complicated from simpler organisms. Continued disuse brings about
+degeneration and ultimate loss of an organ.
+
+Lamarck consequently sees in the adaptability, or power of adaptation,
+which he assumes for all living matter the ultimate cause of variation;
+and, as he was certainly the first to point out that acquired
+characters are inherited by the progeny, he has given a working
+explanation of Evolution.
+
+But his doctrine did not spread--partly because he was misunderstood.
+His theory, that a new want, by making itself felt, exacts from the
+animal new exertions, perhaps from parts hitherto not used, until the
+want is satisfied--this way of putting it sounds too teleological
+to explain the yearned-for change in a mechanical or natural way.
+Moreover, many of his examples lacked the exact basis of experiment
+and observation necessary for their acceptance. Witness that of the
+neck of the giraffe,--a never-failing source of ridicule to men who
+cannot see the deeper purpose underlying the well-meant attempt at
+an explanation, which failed from want of complete knowledge of the
+intricate circumstances.
+
+However, the theory of transformism was, so to speak, in the air;
+and various authors have written on the subject, filling the gap
+between Lamarck and Darwin, especially Goethe, Treviranus, Leopold
+von Buch, and Herbert Spencer. But it is Darwin's immortal merit to
+have opened our eyes by his theory of natural selection, which is, at
+least, the first attempt to explain some of the causes and incidents
+of organic Evolution in a natural mechanical way. Moreover, he was
+the first clearly to express the fundamental principles of the theory
+of descent, to elaborate what had been at best a general sketch of an
+ill-defined problem, and to enter into detail, supported by a host
+of painstaking observations, the making of which had taken him half a
+lifetime. Darwin, without going further than cursorily into the causes
+of variation, argued as follows: We know that variations do occur
+in every kind of living creatures. Some of these variations lead to
+something, while others do not. An enormously greater number of animals
+and plants are born than reach maturity and can in their turn continue
+the race. What is the regulating factor? His answer is, The struggle
+for existence--in other words, the weeding out of the less fit, or
+rather of the owners of those variations which are not so well adapted
+to their surroundings.
+
+For 'adapted' we had better read 'adaptable,' because a variation which
+does not answer, which cannot be made use of, or, still more notably,
+is a hindrance or disadvantage, does not become an adapted feature.
+There is often a confusion between adaptation as an accomplished
+fact, a feature, or resultant condition, and adaptation as the mode
+of fitting the organism to, or making the best of, the prevailing
+surroundings or circumstances.
+
+ÉTIENNE GEOFFROY SAINT-HILAIRE was born in 1772 at Étampes,
+Seine-et-Oise. He was originally brought up for the Church; but when
+already ordained he attended lectures on natural science and medicine
+in Paris. He managed to get the place of assistant in the Musée
+d'Histoire Naturelle; he became Professor of Zoology in 1793, and took
+the opportunity of encouraging young Cuvier. Later he became Professor
+of Zoology of the Faculté des Sciences, and in 1818 he published his
+remarkable 'Philosophie anatomique.' He died in 1844.
+
+He had conceived the 'unity of organic composition,' meaning that there
+is only one plan of construction,--the same principle, but varied in
+its accessory parts. In 1830, when Geoffroy proceeded to apply to the
+Invertebrata his views as to the uniformity of animal composition,
+he found a vigorous opponent in Cuvier. Geoffroy, like Goethe, held
+that there is in Nature a law of compensation, or balancing of growth,
+so that if one organ take on an excess of development, it is at the
+expense of another part; and he maintained that, since Nature takes no
+sudden leaps, even organs which are superfluous in any given species,
+if they have played an important part in other species of the same
+family, are retained as rudiments, which testify to the permanence
+of the general plan of creation. It was his conviction that, owing
+to the conditions of life, the same forms had _not_ been perpetuated
+since the origin of all things, although it was not his belief that
+existing species were becoming modified. Cuvier, on the other hand,
+maintained the absolute invariability of species, which, he declared,
+had been created with regard to the circumstances in which they were
+placed, each organ contrived with a view to the function it had
+to fulfil,--thus putting the effect for the cause ('Encyclopædia
+Britannica,' 9th edition, vol. xxi., p. 171).
+
+GEORGE CUVIER was born in 1769 at Montbéliard, in the department of
+Doubs, which at that time belonged to Württemberg. He was educated at
+Stuttgart, and studied political economy. While acting as private tutor
+to a French family in France he followed his favourite pursuit, the
+study of natural sciences. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire heard of him, and
+appointed him assistant in the department of comparative anatomy in the
+Musée d'Histoire Naturelle. In 1799 he was elected Professor of Natural
+History at the Collège de France, and soon after he became Perpetual
+Secretary of the Institut National. In 1831, a year before his death,
+Louis Philippe raised him to the rank of a peer of France.
+
+Cuvier was the first to indicate the true principle upon which the
+natural classification of animals should be based--namely, their
+structure. It is the study of the anatomy of the creatures and their
+comparison which affords the only sound basis of a classification.
+The work which had the greatest influence upon the scientific public
+is his 'Règne animal distribué d'après son Organisation,' 1817. The
+system which he propounded in this book gradually came to have almost
+world-wide fame, and, in spite of its many obvious deficiencies, still
+lingers in some of our most recent text-books.
+
+A standard work is his 'Leçons d'Anatomie comparée,' and, in truth, he
+is the founder of that kind of comparative anatomy which was brought
+to such a high state by his pupil, the late Sir Richard Owen. Cuvier
+discovered the law of 'correlation of growth,' and was the first to
+apply this law to the reconstruction of animals from fragments: see his
+monumental work entitled 'Recherches sur les Ossemens fossiles,' 1812.
+
+Cuvier, however, as a strict matter-of-fact man, was incapable of
+appreciating the speculative conclusions which were drawn by his
+contemporaries Saint-Hilaire and Lamarck. On the contrary, he firmly
+stuck to the doctrine of the immutability of species; and, in order to
+account for the existence of animals whose kind exists no longer, he
+invented the famous doctrine of successive cataclysms.
+
+KARL ERNST VON BAER was born in 1792 in Esthonia, studied at Dorpat
+and then at Würzburg, where Döllinger introduced him to comparative
+anatomy. For a few years he was a _Privat-docent_ at Berlin; then he
+went to Königsberg as Professor of Zoology and Embryology. In 1834
+he became an Academician at St. Petersburg, where for many years he
+was occupied with the most varied studies, chiefly geographical and
+ethnological. The last years of his long, active life he spent in
+contemplative retirement on his paternal estate, and he died at Dorpat
+in 1876.
+
+While still at Würzburg he induced his friend Pander, a young man
+of means, to study the development of the chick; and Pander was the
+first to start the theory of the germinal layers from which all the
+organs arise. Baer, however, continued these researches in Königsberg,
+and after nine years' labour produced his epoch-making work, 'Ueber
+Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion,'
+Königsberg, 1828. Nine years later he completed the second volume.
+He established upon a firm basis the theory of the germinal layers,
+and by further 'reflexions' arrived at the elucidation of some of the
+most fundamental laws of biology. For example, in the first volume
+he made the following prophetic statement: 'Perhaps all animals are
+alike, and nothing but hollow globes at their earliest developmental
+beginning. The farther back we trace their development, the more
+resemblance we find in the most different creatures. And this leads to
+the question whether at the beginning of their development all animals
+are essentially alike, and referable to one common ancestral form.
+Considering that the "germ" (which at a certain stage appears in the
+shape of a hollow globe or bag) is the undeveloped animal itself, we
+are not without reason for assuming that the common fundamental form is
+that of a simple vesicle, from which every animal is evolved, not only
+theoretically, but historically.'
+
+This statement is all the more wonderful when we consider that the
+cells, the all-composing individual units, were not discovered until
+ten years later.
+
+In 1829 Baer discovered the human egg, and later the chorda dorsalis.
+In an address delivered in 1834, entitled 'The Most Universal Law
+of Nature in all Development,' he explained that only from a most
+superficial point of view can the various species be looked upon as
+permanent and immutable types; that, on the contrary, they can be
+nothing but passing stages, or series of stages, of development, which
+have been evolved by transformation out of common ancestral forms.
+
+JOHANNES MUELLER, born at Coblenz in 1801, established himself
+as _Privat-docent_ at Bonn, where in 1830 he became Professor of
+Physiology. In 1833 he accepted the Chair of Anatomy and Physiology at
+Berlin, where he died in 1858.
+
+He was one of the most distinguished physiologists and comparative
+anatomists. By summarizing the labours and discoveries already made in
+the field of physiology, by reducing them to order, and abstracting the
+general principles, he became the founder of modern physiology. But
+he was scarcely less distinguished by his researches in comparative
+anatomy. His 'Vergleichende Anatomie der Myxinoiden,' in _Abhandlungen
+der Berliner Akademie_, 1835-45, and 'Ueber die Grenzen der Ganoiden'
+(_ibid._, 1846), are standard works of lasting value.
+
+Mueller exercised a stimulative influence as a teacher. Many well-known
+men--such as Helmholtz, Gegenbaur, Bruecke the physiologist, Guenther
+the zoologist, Virchow the pathologist, Koelliker and Haeckel--have
+been his pupils.
+
+RUDOLPH VIRCHOW was born in 1821 at Schievelbein, a small
+town in Eastern Pomerania. He studied medicine in Berlin as a pupil
+of Johannes Mueller, and went in 1849 to Würzburg, where, under the
+influence of Koelliker, and Leydig the pathologist, he laid the
+foundation of an entirely new branch of medical science--that of
+'cellular pathology.' Since 1856 he has filled the principal Chair of
+Pathology at Berlin. In 1892 he received the Copley medal of the Royal
+Society.
+
+'His contributions to the study of morbid anatomy have thrown light
+upon the diseases of every part of the body; but the broad and
+philosophical view he has taken of the processes of pathology has
+done more than his most brilliant observations to make the science of
+disease.
+
+'In pathology, strictly so called, his two great achievements--the
+detection of the cellular activity which lies at the bottom of
+all morbid as well as normal physiological processes, and the
+classification of the important group of new growths on a natural
+histological basis--have each of them not only made an epoch in
+medicine, but have also been the occasion of fresh extension of science
+by other labourers' (Proc. Royal Soc., 1892).
+
+Virchow has not confined himself to medicine. He takes the keenest
+interest in anthropology and ethnology, on which subjects he has
+contributed many papers. Together with his colleagues Helmholtz the
+physicist, and Du Bois Reymond the physiologist, he has taken a leading
+place in the spreading of natural science; but, unfortunately, he
+did not take to the doctrine of Evolution, and for the last thirty
+years has been its declared antagonist, rarely missing an opportunity
+of denouncing everything but descriptive anatomy and zoology as the
+unsound speculations of dreamers. This has on more than one occasion
+brought him into sharp conflict with Haeckel. His activity is
+astonishing, especially if it be remembered that Virchow has for many
+years been one of the most conspicuous leaders of the Progressists and
+Radicals in the German Parliament and Berlin town-council.
+
+EDWARD DRINKER COPE was born at Philadelphia, Pa. After studying at
+several Continental Universities, especially at Heidelberg, he became
+first Professor of Natural Science at Haverford College, and later
+Professor of Geology and Mineralogy. He died at an early age in 1897.
+As a member of various geological expeditions and other surveys, he
+explored chiefly Kansas, Wyoming, and Colorado; and he published many
+most suggestive papers on the fossil vertebrate fauna of North America,
+and on classification especially of Amphibia and Reptiles.
+
+Among works of a more general philosophical scope may be mentioned 'The
+Origin of the Fittest,' 1887, and his latest work, 'The Primary Factors
+of Organic Evolution,' 1896.
+
+ALBERT VON KOELLIKER, born in 1817, became Professor of Anatomy at
+Würzburg. His earlier studies and discoveries contributed considerably
+to the systematic development of the cell theory. In 1844 he observed
+the division and further multiplication of the original egg cell. Next
+year he showed the continuity between nerve cells and nerve fibres in
+the Vertebrata; later, that the non-striped or smooth muscular tissue
+is composed of cellular elements. He demonstrated that the Gregarinæ
+are unicellular creatures. In 1852 he went with his younger friend
+Gegenbaur to Messina, where he studied especially the development
+of the Cephalopoda (cuttlefishes and allies); and he produced a
+magnificent work on Alcyonaria, Medusæ, and other allied forms. He
+elucidated the development of the vertebral column, especially with
+reference to the notochord.
+
+In 1848 he founded, together with Th. von Siebold, the famous
+_Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie_.
+
+A standard work on mammalian embryology is his 'Entwicklungsgeschichte
+des Menschen und der höheren Thiere,' a text-book of which the second
+edition appeared in 1879.
+
+At the anniversary meeting of 1897 he received the Copley medal, the
+highest honour which the Royal Society can bestow.
+
+CARL GEGENBAUR was born on August 21, 1826, in Bavaria. He studied
+medicine and kindred subjects in Würzburg, and as a pupil of Johannes
+Mueller in Berlin.
+
+In 1852 he went with Koelliker to Messina to study the structure and
+development of the marine fauna. Important papers on Siphonophora,
+Echinoderms, Pteropoda, and, later, Hydrozoa and Mollusca, were the
+result. Soon after his return he was offered the chair of Anatomy at
+Jena, and at this retired spot he produced his most important works,
+devoting himself more and more to the study of the Vertebrata. Since
+1875 he has held the Chair of Anatomy at Heidelberg.
+
+In 1859 he published his 'Principles of Comparative Anatomy'; but in
+1870 he remodelled it completely, the theory of descent being the
+guiding principle. These 'Grundzüge' were followed by a somewhat more
+condensed 'Grundriss,' the second edition of which was published
+in 1878, and has been translated into French and English. In the
+meantime he had broken new ground by the development and treatment of
+certain problems concerning the composition and origin of the limbs,
+the shoulder-girdle and the skull, researches which are embodied in
+his 'Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbelthiere,'
+1864-65-72.
+
+In 1883 he brought out a text-book on human anatomy. This also marked
+a new epoch, because for the first time, not only the nomenclature,
+but also the general treatment of human anatomy, was put upon a firm
+comparative anatomical basis. The success of this work is indicated by
+the fact that it reached the sixth edition in 1897.
+
+Lastly, in 1898, appeared the first volume of what may be called his
+crowning work, 'Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere.'
+
+Gegenbaur is universally recognised, not only as the greatest living
+comparative anatomist, but also as the founder of the modern side of
+this science, by having based it on the theory of descent.
+
+In 1896 he received from the Royal Society the Copley medal 'for
+his pre-eminence in the science of comparative anatomy or animal
+morphology.'
+
+His marvellously powerful influence as a teacher and investigator has
+made Heidelberg a centre whence many pupils have spread his teaching,
+and above all his method of research.
+
+ERNST HEINRICH HAECKEL was born on February 16, 1834, at Potsdam. He
+carried out his academical studies alternately at Berlin and Würzburg,
+attracted by such men as Johannes Mueller, Koelliker, and Virchow.
+For years he was undecided what his career should be, whether that
+of botanist, collector, or geographical traveller. Certainly that of
+medicine attracted him least, although in deference to his father's
+wishes he qualified and settled down for a year's practice in Berlin.
+As he himself has told us, he might perhaps have proved rather
+successful as a physician, to judge from the fact that he did not lose
+a single patient. But 'I had only three patients all told, and the
+reason of this is perhaps that I had given on my plate the hours of
+consultation as from 5 to 6 _a.m._'
+
+During the year 1859 he travelled as medical man and artist in Sicily.
+In 1861 he was induced by Gegenbaur, whose acquaintance he had made in
+Würzburg, to establish himself as a _Privat-docent_ for comparative
+anatomy in Jena. And there he has remained ever since, filling the
+Chair of Zoology, and having declined several much more tempting offers
+from the Universities of Würzburg, Vienna, Strassburg, and Bonn.
+
+Within one year, 1865, he wrote the two volumes of his 'Generelle
+Morphologie der Organismen,' as he himself relates, in order to master
+his sorrow over the loss of his first wife. But he broke down, and went
+to the Canaries to recruit health and strength. The 'Morphologie,'
+which has long been out of print,[25] made scarcely any impression. It
+was ignored, probably because he had placed the old-fashioned study of
+zoology and morphology upon a thoroughly Darwinistic basis.
+
+[25] That this great work is now comparatively rare, although still
+in the second-hand market, may perhaps be urged in excuse of the
+fact of so many attempts made by many authors, both professional and
+amateur, to find fault with or to explain the principles of adaptation,
+variation, heredity, cænogenesis, phylogeny, etc., in complete
+ignorance that all these and many more fundamental questions were fully
+discussed more than thirty years ago in the 'Generelle Morphologie.'
+
+On the advice of his friend Gegenbaur, he gave a more popularly
+written abstract of his 'Generelle Morphologie'--in fact, the
+substance of a series of his lectures--in the shape of his 'Natürliche
+Schöpfungsgeschichte.' This 'History of Natural Creation,' which
+in 1898 has reached the ninth edition (first edition translated
+into English in 1873), had the desired effect. So also had his
+'Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen,' the fourth
+edition of which appeared in 1891.
+
+It was a lucky coincidence that Haeckel had just finished his
+preliminary academical studies, was entirely at leisure, and
+undetermined to which branch of natural science he should devote his
+genius, when Darwin's great work was given to the world. Haeckel
+embraced the new doctrine fervently, and, as Huxley was doing in
+England, he spread it and fought for it with ever-increasing vigour in
+Germany.
+
+With marvellous vigour and quickness of perception he applied the
+principles of Evolution or the theory of descent to the whole organic
+world, and not only opened entirely new vistas for the study of
+morphology, but also worked them out and fixed them. He was the first
+to draw up pedigrees of the various larger groups of animals and
+plants, filling the gaps by fossils or with hypothetical forms (the
+necessary existence of which he arrived at by logical deductions);
+and thus he reconstructed the first universal pedigree, a gigantic
+ancestral tree, from the simple unicellular Amoeba to Man. Of course
+these pedigrees were entirely provisional, as he himself has over and
+over again avowed; but they are, nevertheless, the ideal which all
+systematists and morphologists working upon the basis of Evolution have
+since been seeking to establish.
+
+Naturally he was vigorously attacked, not only by anti-Darwinians,
+or rather anti-Evolutionists, but also by many of those who, having
+accepted the principle of transformism, ought to have known better.
+Perhaps they thought they did know better. Imperfections or mistakes in
+details of the grand attempt,--and these, naturally, were many,--were
+singled out as samples of the whole, which was ridiculed as the romance
+of a dreamer.
+
+In the end, however, this hostility, narrow-minded and unfair in
+many respects, has done good to the cause. There has arisen an
+ever-increasing school of workers in favour of the new doctrine. Owing
+to renewed research, criticism, corrections in all directions, we
+now know considerably more about natural classification (and this is
+pedigree) than when Haeckel first opened out the whole problem.
+
+Owing to his fearless mode of exposition, regardless of the indignant
+wrath which the new doctrine aroused in certain ecclesiastical
+quarters, Haeckel bore the brunt of almost endless attacks, and had to
+write polemical essays. The result has been that friend and foe alike
+are now working on the lines which he has laid down; most of the ideas
+which he was the first to conceive, and to formulate by inventing a
+scientific terminology for them, have become important branches, or
+even disciplines, of the science.
+
+Most morphologists of the younger generations now take these terms
+for granted, without remembering the name of their founder. It is,
+therefore, perhaps not quite superfluous to mention some of them:
+
+_Phylum_, or stem, the sum total of all those organisms which have
+probably descended from one common lower form. He distinguished eight
+such phyla--Protozoa, Coelenterata, Helminthes or Vermes, Tunicata,
+Mollusca, Articulata, and Vertebrata. The phyla are more or less
+analogous to 'super-classes,' large branches or 'circles,' or principal
+groups of other zoologists.
+
+_Phylogeny_, the history of the development of these various phyla,
+classes, orders, families, and species.
+
+_Ontogeny_, the history or study of the development of the individual,
+generally called embryology. In reality the scope of embryology
+is the ontogenetic study of the various species, and this branch
+of developmental study alone can be checked by direct, 'exact'
+observation, for the simple reason that the individuals alone are
+entities, while the species, genera, families, etc., are abstract ideas.
+
+The _ontogenesis of any given living organism is a short, condensed
+recapitulation of its ancestral history or of its phylogenesis_. This
+is Haeckel's 'fundamental biogenetic law.'
+
+A complete proof of the phylogeny of any creature would be given by
+the preservation of an unbroken series of all its fossil ancestors.
+Such a series will in most cases, for obvious reasons, always remain a
+desideratum. In a few cases, however, the desideratum is nearly met:
+for example, the ancestral line of the one-toed digitigrade horse from
+a four-or five-toed plantigrade and still very generalized Ungulate is
+approaching completion.
+
+Phylogenetic study has to rely upon other help. This is afforded by
+comparative anatomy and by the study of ontogeny. If the latter were
+a faithful, unbroken recapitulation of all the stages through which
+the ancestors have passed, the whole matter would be very simple; but
+we know for certain that in the individual development many stages
+are left out (or, rather, are hurried through, and are so condensed
+by short-cuts being taken that we cannot observe them), while other
+features which have been introduced obscure, and occasionally modify
+beyond recognition, the original course.
+
+Again, the sequence of the appearance of the various organs is
+frequently upset (_heterochronism_). Some organs are accelerated in
+their development, while others, which we know to be phylogenetically
+older, are retarded in making their reappearance in the embryo.
+
+These disturbing or distorting newly introduced features or factors
+show themselves chiefly in connection with the embryonic conditions of
+growth--for example, yolk-sac, placenta, amnion. They all come within
+the category of _cænogenesis_: they are cænogenetic, while the true,
+undisturbed recapitulation is _palingenetic_.
+
+Lastly, some features, so-called rudimentary or vestigial organs,
+instead of disappearing, are most tenacious in their recurrence,
+while others of originally fundamental importance scarcely leave
+recognisable traces, and are, so to speak, only hinted at during the
+embryonic growth of the creature we happen to study. Hence arises the
+philosophical study of 'Dysteleology.'
+
+Among other terms invented by Haeckel, and now in general use, are
+_Metamere_, _Metamerism_, _Coelom_, _Gonochorism_, _Gastrula_,
+_Metazoa_, _Gnathostomata_, _Acrania_, _Craniota_, and _Amniota_.
+
+Hitherto we have dealt with his general work only, a résumé of which
+he gave for many years in a course of thirty lectures before an
+audience composed of 'all sorts and conditions of men.' Students of
+biology and of medicine side by side with theologians, incipient and
+ordained, jurists, political economists, and philosophers, crowded his
+lecture-room during the 'seventies to hear the master explaining the
+'natural history of creation' or the mysteries of anthropogenesis.
+Another course of eighty lectures during the winter semester was, and
+still is, devoted to a systematic treatment of zoology, while practical
+classes are reserved for the more select.
+
+His winning personality and fascinating eloquence, combined with a
+clear and concise delivery, have gained the enthusiastic admiration of
+many a student who went to the quiet University town in order to learn
+with his own ears and eyes.
+
+_List of Separate Publications by Professor Haeckel._
+
+'Biologische Studien. I.: Studien ueber die Moneren und andere
+Protisten.' Leipzig, 1870 (out of print). He was the first to
+make observations on the natural history of the Monera, living
+bits of protoplasm, devoid even of a nucleus--_e.g._, _Protogenes
+primordialis_, _Protomyxa aurantiaca_.
+
+'Monographie der Radiolarien.' Berlin, 1862-88. With 171 plates.
+
+'Entwicklungsgeschichte der Siphonophoren.' Utrecht, 1869.
+
+'Plankton-Studien. Vergleichende Untersuchungen ueber die Bedeutung und
+Zusammensetzung der pelagischen Fauna und Flora.' Jena, 1880.
+
+'Metagenesis und Hypogenesis von Aurelia aurita.' Jena, 1881.
+
+'Monographie der Geryoniden oder Ruesselquallen.' Leipzig, 1865.
+
+'Generelle Morphologie der Organismen.' 2 vols. Berlin, 1866.
+
+'Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen,' 1874; 4th
+edition, 1891.
+
+'Natuerliche Schoepfungs-Geschichte.' 2 vols. Berlin, 1st edition,
+1868; 9th edition, 1898. This work has been translated into most
+European languages (the first edition in English, under the title
+'Natural History of Creation' in 1873; the eighth in 1892).
+
+'Monographie der Kalkschwaemme.' 3 vols. Berlin, 1872 (out of print).
+With the subtitle, 'An Attempt to solve analytically the Problem of
+the Origin of Species.' In this work, illustrated by sixty plates, he
+showed that the Calcispongia are individually so yielding, so adaptive
+to external influences, that it is practically impossible to break up
+the whole group into anything like satisfactory species or genera.
+According to predilection, we can distinguish either 1 genus with only
+3 species, or 3, 21, 43 genera, with 21, 111, 181, or 289 species
+respectively.
+
+In this work, in 1872, Haeckel established the homology of the two
+primary layers, ecto- and endoderm, throughout the Metazoa. The attempt
+to do the same for the four secondary layers, as made in the second
+part of his 'Gastræa-theory,' failed. It caused an enormous amount of
+research, hitherto without a satisfactory solution of the problem.
+
+'Studien zur Gastræa-Theorie.' Jena, 1874. The transformation of
+the single primitive egg-cell by cleavage into a globular mass of
+cells (Morula)--which latter, becoming hollow (and then known as the
+Blastula), turns ultimately by invagination or by delamination into
+the Gastrula--is a series of processes which applies to all Metazoa.
+The Gastrula is, therefore, the ancestral form of the Metazoa; and the
+Gastræa-theory, founded by Haeckel, throws light, on the one hand, upon
+the mystery of the phyletic connection of the various animal groups,
+while, on the other hand, it connects the Metazoa, or multicellular
+organisms, with the lowest Protozoa. We come to this conclusion
+becaues the Gastrula arises from and passes through stages which exist as
+independent, permanent organisms among the Protozoa.
+
+Needless to say this Gastræa-theory has been violently attacked in
+detail, with the result that various modifications of the Gastrula,
+until then undreamed of, have become known.
+
+'Monographie der Medusen.' Jena, 1879-81. With 72 coloured plates.
+
+'Reports on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S.
+_Challenger_.' With 230 plates:
+
+ 1. Deep-sea Medusæ. 1881.
+ 2. Radiolaria. 1887.
+ 3. Siphonophoræ. 1888.
+ 4. Deep-sea Keratosa. 1889.
+
+A short holiday spent on the coasts of the Red Sea produced the volume
+'Arabische Korallen' (Berlin, 1876); and a longer trip to Ceylon has
+been described in 'Indische Reisebriefe,' of which the third edition
+appeared in 1893. The English translation (1883) is entitled 'A Visit
+to Ceylon.'
+
+'Monism as connecting Religion and Science: the Confession of Faith of
+a Man of Science.' 1894.
+
+Haeckels latest work is the 'Systematische Phylogenie' (Berlin, 1896),
+three volumes dealing with Protistæ and Plants, Invertebrata and
+Vertebrata. They contain the author's views on the natural system of
+the organic world, both living and extinct. Notable in the work are
+the many reconstructions of ancestral forms which, provided Evolution
+is true, must have existed--hypothetical until they, or something like
+them, are found in a fossil state. Everybody who works systematically,
+and upon the basis of Evolution, does, sometimes unconsciously,
+reconstruct such links, although he may perhaps not see the necessity,
+or have the courage to fix his vision, by assigning to it all those
+attributes or characters which are indicated by deductions from
+comparative anatomy, palæontology, and embryology.
+
+
+
+
+ THEORY OF CELLS.
+
+
+The vegetable cell was discovered by _Schleiden_, Professor of Botany
+at Jena, in 1838. Next year _Schwann_ found the animal cell.
+
+In 1844 _Koelliker_ discovered that the egg cell, by division and
+multiplication, becomes an aggregation--a heap of new cells.
+
+In 1849 _Huxley_ found the two primary layers (observed long before
+by _Pander_ and _Baer_ in the chick) also in certain Invertebrata,
+the Medusæ; and he called these layers 'ectoderm' and 'endoderm'
+respectively.
+
+In 1851 _Remak_, in his 'Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der
+Thiere,' showed the egg to be a simple cell, and that from it, by
+repeated division or multiplication, arise the germinal layers, and
+that by differentiation of the cells of these layers are formed all the
+tissues of the body.
+
+_Kowalevsky_, of St. Petersburg, found the two primary germinal layers
+also in Worms, Echinoderms, Articulata, and other animals.
+
+_Haeckel_, in 1872, found the same in the Sponges. He stated that these
+two germinal layers occur in all animals, except in the Protozoa;
+and that they are homologous, or equivalent, in all the groups of
+animals, from the Sponges up to Man. In 1873, in his 'Gastræa-theorie,'
+he explained the phylogenetic significance, and tried to show the
+homology, of the four secondary germinal layers.
+
+
+
+
+ FACTORS OF EVOLUTION.
+
+
+An organism, as living matter, does not stand in opposition to,
+or outside of, the rest of the world. It is part of the world. It
+receives matter from its surroundings, and gives some back; therefore
+it is influenced by its surroundings. It is acted upon, and it reacts
+upon the latter, and if these change (and they are nowhere and never
+strictly the same) the organism also _varies_. It _adapts_ itself, and
+if it does not, or, rather, cannot, do so, it dies, because it is unfit
+to live in the world, or, rather, in those particular surroundings
+and conditions in which it happens to be. That organism which yields
+most easily, accommodates itself most quickly, has the best chance of
+existence--_survival of the fittest_. 'Fitness' in this case does not
+mean fitness to live, but rather a particular condition which happens
+to fit into the new circumstances.
+
+Adaptation and variation are simultaneous: they are fundamentally the
+same. If there were no adaptability and no variability, those simplest
+of organisms which we suppose to have sprung into existence in the
+pre-Cambrian period would long ago have ceased to exist.
+
+It is the physiological momentum which models the organism, and, by
+causing its adaptations, has produced its organs by change of function.
+Gegenbaur illustrates this most important fundamental truth by an
+excellent example. Suppose that, in an absolutely simple organism, all
+the parts of its exterior are under the same functional conditions,
+so that each part of the surface can take in food, and that this is
+digested, assimilated, in the interior. There is, in this condition,
+not yet any definite organ. If this organism sinks to the bottom and
+becomes sessile, this part is excluded from taking in nourishing
+matter, while the opposite surface alone remains, or becomes more, fit
+for this function. Thus, a simple variation and adaptation has been
+produced, and if the same organism continues in this position, its
+bottom cells will estrange themselves from their original function,
+while those on the top will convey the food into the interior, where
+a cavity will be formed, ultimately with a permanent opening, the
+primitive gut and mouth, both very different from the 'foot.'
+
+Thus, by adaptation and variation the organism acquires new functions,
+organs, features, and it gives up and eventually loses others. Its
+offspring is like it. Like produces like. This is the principle of
+_heredity_. Adaptation, when going on generation after generation on
+the same lines in the same direction, becomes continuous, and has an
+intensifying, _cumulative_ effect. By always weeding out from a flock
+of pigeons those birds which possess more dark feathers than the rest,
+we ultimately produce an entirely white race. We hurry on what Nature
+does slowly.
+
+The inheritance of acquired characters becomes very obvious in the
+following example: The Monera are the lowest living organisms known;
+they consist of a mass of protoplasm, and are still devoid of even
+a nucleus. They multiply simply by division; each half is like the
+other, and like the parent (which by this process has ceased to exist),
+except that each is smaller and has to grow. A certain Moneron,
+_Protomyxa aurantiaca_, is orange-coloured, and its offspring is from
+the beginning of the same colour, and this colour has been acquired
+by that kind of Monera-like protoplasm which thereby has become the
+species called Aurantiaca. We have no reason for assuming that there
+existed from the beginning of life not only colourless, but also red,
+orange, and other kinds of protoplasm. In these simplest of organisms
+the whole process of heredity seems very obvious; but in the higher
+ones, in those which propagate by eggs, the problem is infinitely
+more complicated. It is true that the egg is, strictly, nothing but
+a small part of the parental organism, and we know from everyday
+experience that this single egg-cell has in it all the attributes and
+characteristics of the parent; but these attributes and characteristics
+make their appearance successively, just as the egg cell of a chick has
+neither wings nor feathers, not even a backbone, but develops these
+organs because its parents have them.
+
+The theory that acquired characters are hereditary has often been
+vigorously attacked; but the champions of the negative position have
+not given us anything satisfactory instead. They question, also, the
+principle of adaptation as a factor in Evolution, and substitute
+'variation,' coupled with 'natural selection.'
+
+They point to Darwin's argument: (1) It is a fact that animals and
+plants produce a much greater number of young than in their turn grow
+up to propagate the race; (2) no two of the frequently many individuals
+of the same breed are exactly alike, although the differences may be
+hidden to our perception (this is quite true, because no two entities
+can live in absolutely the same place and conditions); (3) through
+heredity the offspring takes over the faculties and features of the
+parents; (4) what decides which of the many individuals (each one
+possessing some aberration or variation) are to live and to propagate
+the race?--obviously those individual variations which happen to make
+the lucky possessors most fit for the struggle for life.
+
+So far, well; but the 'Neo-Darwinians' imagine that 'adaptation'
+is not the cause, but the result, the effect, of the formation of
+species. According to them, the species are neither adapted by, nor do
+they adapt themselves to, their surroundings. Adaptation is to them
+an accomplished fact, a condition which a species happens to be in
+because its particular variation is the one which, to the exclusion of
+others, suits or fits into its surroundings. Such a view simply takes
+variation for granted, and stipulates it as a something _a priori_,
+without raising the further necessary question, why there should be
+any variations at all. Why, indeed, unless they are caused by external
+influences? Haeckel elucidated this by the conception of adaptation as
+explained in the foregoing pages.
+
+These and kindred speculations have produced some rather curious
+discussions, which not infrequently end in conundrums. If we speak of
+a case of adaptation as a condition, a fact, we easily run the risk
+of getting into confusion about cause and effect. For example: Is the
+stag swift because he has long and slender legs, or are his legs long
+because he is swift? In reality, swiftness and length of legs are cause
+and effect in one. His legs have been so modified as to make him swift,
+because he has put them continuously to whatever was his full speed,
+which in his thick-footed ancestors was probably a very slow one. The
+above question reads, therefore, more sensibly as follows: Has the stag
+become swift because his legs have become long and slender, or have his
+legs become long and slender because he has attained swiftness? Now, we
+see that both halves of the double question are practically the same
+and instantly suggest the answer.
+
+A fundamental difference between artificial machines and living
+organisms is that the former are worn out by use, while the latter not
+only repair the loss caused by use, but are also stimulated to further
+increase. On the other hand, organs which are not put into function,
+or are not used, _degenerate_. The various cells of the organ react
+upon external stimuli by increased activity. Why this should be so is
+another question--perhaps because those which do not would soon be not
+fit to survive. Each cell has a function; the more specialized the more
+intense it is. Every external stimulus, every contact with the outer
+surroundings, is an insult, necessarily of detrimental effect, as it
+disturbs the equilibrium of the cell body. It must, therefore, be of
+advantage to the cells' well-being to return as soon as possible to the
+_status quo ante_, and this can only be done by increased activity.
+
+In the present state of our knowledge, we can approach only the
+simplest cases of acquisition of characteristics. Mostly they are
+so complicated, subject to so many unthought-of conditions, that we
+do not know from which end to approach the problem. Frequently the
+supposed use of certain obvious features is the merest guesswork. This
+applies especially to features to which we are not accustomed (although
+wrongly so) to assign a function--for example, coloration. A green
+tree-frog will with predilection rest on green leaves. The advantages
+of concealment are obvious, and in this case he 'adapts himself' to the
+surroundings by making for green localities: if he did not he would
+be eaten up sooner than his more circumspect comrades. But this making
+for, and sitting in, the green has not _necessarily_ made him of that
+colour. Extreme advocates of one view would argue as follows: Once upon
+a time there were among the offspring of ancestral tree-frogs some
+which, among other colours, exhibited green, not much, perhaps not even
+perceptible to our eyes. The occurrence of this colour, according to
+them, was spontaneous, a freak--as if in reality there were anything
+spontaneous in the sense of being causeless. The descendants of these
+more greenish creatures, provided they did not pair with frogs of the
+ordinary set, became still greener (by accumulative inheritance), and
+so on, until the green was pronounced sufficient to be of advantage
+when competition could set in.
+
+With this view there is always the difficulty of understanding how the
+initial very small changes can be useful, unless we have to deal with
+extremely simple organisms. Is it likely in the case of our frogs that
+an almost imperceptible variation in colour makes them more fit to
+live? We have to assume that 'luck' or chance kept them for generations
+out of harm's reach, until the accumulation of green, hitherto quite
+ineffective, neither harmful nor useful, became strong enough to be
+effective. Such cases undoubtedly happen.
+
+But we can also argue out this problem in a somewhat different way,
+which goes nearer to the root of the whole process. The original
+slight, imperceptible change in pigmentation is not a spontaneous
+freak; it was caused by the direct influence of the surroundings in
+which the particular frogs happened to live, be this factor light or
+temperature or food. Thus it stands to reason that the offspring,
+living under similar conditions, will be acted upon in the same way.
+That factor which has added green to the parents will add green to the
+children, until by accumulative inheritance a more decidedly green
+race is produced.
+
+The offspring of green plants do not become green when grown in the
+dark; the young plants inherit not the green, but the capacity of
+becoming green when acted upon by sunlight. This as an instance of
+direct influence of the surroundings on a substance (chlorophyll),
+which has not yet performed a function. But the kittens of a pair of
+black cats produce black hair before they are born, and we have no
+reason to doubt that the black pigment in their tegumentary structures
+is ultimately referable to the action of the sunlight. In many
+instances creatures living for generations in darkness become white,
+pigmentless, and they regain it when exposed to light. For example, the
+white, colourless Proteus from the caves of Adelsberg becomes clouded
+grey, and ultimately jet black, when kept in a tank whence light is not
+strictly excluded.
+
+Blindness is a very general characteristic of creatures which dwell in
+darkness. There are all stages between total blindness and weak eyes.
+Now, do these blind creatures live in darkness because they are blind,
+or have they become first weak-eyed and then blind because of the
+continuous disuse of their eyes? The former explanation has actually
+been suggested! Individuals not smitten, but spontaneously, as a freak,
+born with sore eyes, have crept into the darkness for relief and have
+produced a blind race! To carry such a notion to the bitter end leads
+to absurdities. Anyhow, it is not understandable where the benefit
+of losing the eyesight arises. It can be explained only by continued
+disuse: witness _Spalax typhlus_, the blind mole, and, above all, the
+Endoparasites.
+
+Let us now take an example to explain the influence of a tangible
+external stimulus. Repeated pressure produces callosities. Although
+they are not exactly beneficial in the shape of corns on our toes,
+they are so on our hands. At any rate, the morphologist can trace the
+development of the footpads, nails, hoofs, and horns, step by step from
+small beginnings. The cells of the Malpighian stratum, of the inner,
+active portion of our epidermis, are excited to extra activity, and
+by continually producing more horn cells than peel off the surface of
+the skin in the normal process of wear and tear cause the formation
+of the pad. It need scarcely be mentioned that hypertrophic growths
+are not necessarily useful; they are often harmful, and in that case
+pathological.
+
+Lastly, a few words about the very difficult question of _teleology_.
+In trying to explain Evolution in a mechanical--sometimes called
+monistic, but in reality natural--way, we exclude anything like a
+set purpose, a goal, or ideal, a final condition which the organism
+strives to attain. Unknown, however, to many morphologists, especially
+embryologists, their writings are full of this teleological notion.
+Indeed, there are many cases in which an organism becomes changed, and
+quickly, too, in a way which cannot but be called reasonable. It starts
+modifications, be they outgrowths, alterations in shape or colour, or
+the making good of injuries received, which by 'short-cuts' produce
+the only advantageous result that can reasonably satisfy the new
+requirement or altered circumstances.
+
+Trees growing in precarious positions, after part of the supporting
+rock has slipped away, throw out new roots, and rearrange some of
+the old ones in the only way which could save the tree. In animals
+which have lost part of a limb the wound closes up, and what is left
+is turned into a serviceable stump--for example, in water-tortoises
+(creatures in which reproduction of lost limbs does not happen). In
+frogs and newts the lost part is reproduced, not correctly, but in a
+good semblance. Tortoises which have had their shell smashed can throw
+off an astonishingly large portion and renew the bone as well as the
+overlapping scutes; but this mending is not neatly done. It serves the
+requirement, but it is patchwork; the new shell is such as no tortoise
+ever possessed before.
+
+Mammals transported into colder countries, or subjected to continued
+exposure, grow a thicker coat; and the same kind of tree which in a
+sheltered valley is tall, large-leaved, and soft-wooded, assumes a very
+different aspect, although perhaps growing into a healthy specimen,
+when planted on a wind-exposed hill.
+
+There is no room, or, rather, no time, to apply to these cases the
+principle of many variations or the long-continued accumulation of
+infinitely small changes. The thing is to be done quickly, or not
+at all. Nor can we explain the mending of a wound, which implies an
+activity of countless cells, simply as a case of, or similar to, the
+reproduction of a lost part; against such an explanation militates the
+almost absolute unlikelihood of that precise injury having happened
+before to any of the creature's ancestors.
+
+Still, I think we are brought near the solution of the mystery by
+such considerations. We see no difficulty in the regeneration of a
+few cells, or in the making good of the disturbance suffered by one
+of the most simple organisms; but we become suspicious when we see
+that countless cells, not of one kind, but of the most varied tissues
+and parts of the body, make common cause in remedying a defect in a
+serviceable way.
+
+We must assume that since the beginning of life organisms have been
+subjected to countless insults. We can scarcely speak of a wound in
+an Amæba; but these insults have always been made good, and whenever
+this was not the case, that particular organism came to an end. As
+these organisms developed into more complicated ones, the possible
+insults became more serious, more complicated; and the organisms took
+adaptive measures so as to be superior to them. This action, I have
+no hesitation in declaring, became by heredity a habit. The whole
+creature became so thoroughly 'imbued' (for want of a better word) with
+the finding of ways and means for meeting sudden, serious conditions,
+that it now acts directly, and produces by a short-cut, with the least
+amount of time and with the smallest possible waste of material, that
+which meets the occasion, thereby saving the life of the individual
+and that of the race. This we cannot but call reasonable and to the
+purpose, although it is all carried out by _causæ efficientes_ without
+there being any _causæ finales_.
+
+
+
+
+ GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION.
+
+
+One million years is a stretch of time beyond our conception. We can
+arrive at a more or less adequate understanding of what a million
+individuals or concrete things means. Several Continental nations
+can put more than a million men into the field. We can gaze at a
+building which contains as many bricks; and we know that our own body
+is composed of millions of millions of cells. No such help applies to
+time, because that itself is an entirely relative, abstract conception.
+We can imagine what one hundred years are like--a span of time
+seemingly short to the hale and hearty octogenarian, enormous to the
+child, totally inapplicable to certain animals whose whole life is
+crowded into one single day.
+
+Astronomers have long ceased to reckon distances by miles or any
+other understandable unit. They express the distances between us and
+the stars and nebulæ by 'years of light.' Try to imagine a unit of
+length equal to that which is passed through by light (186,000 miles
+per second) in one year. Not so very long ago the enormous distances
+resulting from astronomical calculations were looked upon as the most
+serious objection to the correctness of the astronomers' views as to
+the distances which separate our globe from the nearest fixed stars.
+We have not yet accustomed ourselves to reckoning time by some similar
+broadly-conceived standard--say æons of so many thousand years each.
+
+Unfortunately, we possess no data whatever for calculating the age
+of the successive geological strata. Thanks to Lyell, the theory of
+violent universal cataclysms has been done away with. It is more
+probable that the same agencies have acted which are now changing
+the aspect of the globe; and these changes are slow, as far as we
+know them--at least, as far as the formation of sedimentary strata is
+concerned, and these alone we have to deal with. Various calculations
+have been made, based upon the denudation of the mountains, the
+filling up of the valleys by the débris, the formation of deltas,
+etc. The results give enormous stretches of time, but all of them
+unsatisfactory, because the methods are so very local in their
+application.
+
+The least objectionable attempt is that which, based upon astronomical
+calculations, tried to fix the height of the last Glacial epoch[26] at
+about 200,000 years ago, and asserted that since its beginning in the
+Pliocene epoch as many as 270,000 years have elapsed. The duration
+of the whole Tertiary period has by the same authorities been fixed
+approximately at 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 years. Beyond this we cannot
+venture without the wildest speculation; but we know to a certain
+extent the thickness of the various sedimentary strata, which amount
+in all to from 100,000 to 175,000 feet--on the average perhaps 130,000
+feet, or about twenty miles.
+
+ [26] James Croll: 'On Geological Time, and the Probable Date of the
+ Glacial and Upper Miocene Period,' _Philos. Magazine_, xxxv., 1868, pp.
+ 363-384; xxxvi., pp. 141-154; 362-386.
+
+Unless we prefer giving up all attempt at calculation as absolutely
+hopeless, and thus resign the whole problem, we must at least try to
+arrive at some results, and then see if these cannot reasonably be made
+use of.
+
+Neither geologist nor physicist, and no zoologist, would accept the
+suggestion that these 130,000 feet of stratified rocks have been
+deposited within only as many years, although the average rate of
+deposit would in that case be not more than 1 foot per year. On the
+other hand, an indignant protest is raised against the assumption of
+1,000,000,000 years.
+
+Lord Kelvin[27] has come to the conclusion (from data which various
+other authorities regard as very unsatisfactory) that not much more
+than 100,000,000 years can have elapsed since the molten globe acquired
+a consolidated crust. Further time must have passed before the surface
+had become stable and cool enough to allow the temperature of the
+collecting oceans to fall below boiling-point, and it is obvious that
+life cannot possibly have begun until after this had happened.
+
+ [27] William Thomson: 'On the Secular Cooling of the Earth,' _Transact.
+ R. S. Edinb._, xxiii., 1864, pp. 157-169.
+
+Wallace, in his 'Island Life,' by making use of Professor A. Geikie's
+results as to the rate of denudation of matter by rivers from the
+area of their basins, and estimating the average rate of deposition,
+concludes that 'the time required to produce this thickness of rock
+[Professor Haughton's maximum of 177,000 feet] at the present rate
+of denudation and deposition is only 28,000,000 years.' Our lower
+assumption of 130,000 feet thickness would give only 20,000,000
+years--a rate of 1 foot in 154 years.
+
+Again, if we prefer round numbers to start with, we have only to
+assume that the age of the whole Tertiary period, with its 3,000 feet
+thickness, is 3,000,000 years (_i.e._, 1,000 feet in 1,000,000 years,
+or 1 foot in 1,000 years, surely an excessively slow rate); then
+130,000,000 years would bring us to the bottom of the Laurentian or
+pre-Cambrian deposits. Of course, it is a pure assumption that the
+same rate of destruction and sedimentation applies to the whole of the
+strata; but we know nothing to the contrary, especially if we consider
+the average periods, the quick periods of extra activity, taken with
+the slow periods or those of standstill.
+
+Dana estimated the length of the whole Tertiary period at one-fifteenth
+of the Mesozoic and Palæozoic combined. If we take the duration of the
+Tertiary period, as before, as 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 years, the total
+will amount to from 45,000,000 to 60,000,000 years.
+
+Lastly, Walcott[28] has estimated the duration of the Palæozoic,
+Mesozoic, and Cænozoic or Tertiary epochs at about 17,000,000,
+7,000,000 and 3,000,000 years respectively, giving 27,700,000 years
+from the beginning of the Cambrian; and Williams[29] has calculated the
+relative duration of the smaller epochs. See the table on p. 149.
+
+The results of all these calculations fall surprisingly well within
+the limits of Lord Kelvin's allowance. Of course they are based upon
+assumptions, but none of them is inherently unreasonable; and it
+was my purpose to draw attention to the surprising coincidence in
+the closeness of these results, perhaps too good to be true. Such
+calculations are considered close enough if they range within a few
+multiples of each other.
+
+ [28] 'Geological Time as indicated by the Sedimentary Rocks of North
+ America.' _Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci._, xlii., 1893, pp. 129-169.
+
+ [29] Henry Shaler Williams, 'Geological Biology.' New York, 1895.
+
+Zoologists have fallen into the habit of requiring enormous lengths of
+time for the evolution of the animal kingdom. We know that Evolution is
+at best a slow process, and the conception of the changes necessary to
+evolve man from monkey-like creatures, these from the lowest imaginary
+mammals, these from some reptilian stock, thence descending to Dipnoan
+fish-like creatures, and so on back into Invertebrata, down to the
+simple Monera--this conception is indeed gigantic. Innumerable, almost
+endless, slow changes require seemingly unlimited time, and as time is
+endless, why not draw upon it _ad libitum_?
+
+Huxley pointed out that it took nearly the whole of the Tertiary epoch
+to produce the horse out of the four-toed Eohippos, and that, if we
+apply this rate to the rest of its pedigree, enormous times would
+be required. This is, however, a very misleading statement, which
+necessitates considerable reduction, in conformity with our increased
+palæontological knowledge. Animals of the genus Equus--namely,
+Ungulata, with one toe, and with a certain tooth pattern--from the
+Upper Miocene of India are now known. Moreover, it is not simply a
+question of the gradual loss of the side-toes. The change from the
+fox-sized little Eohippos and Hyracotherium, so far as skull, teeth,
+vertebral column, and limbs are concerned (about the soft parts we know
+next to nothing), is a very great one indeed.
+
+Elephants and mammoths seem to have developed very rapidly. None are
+known from Eocene strata; but towards the end of the Miocene they had
+spread over Asia, Europe, and North America, and that in great numbers.
+The Eocene Amblypoda are still so different that we hesitate to connect
+them ancestrally with the elephants.
+
+The Pinnipedia (seals and walruses) are strongly modified fissiped
+Carnivora, and have existed since at least the Upper Miocene; the
+transformation must have been accomplished within the Miocene period.
+
+We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that various groups have from the
+time of their first appearance burst out into an exuberant growth of
+modifications in form, size, and numbers, into all possible--and one
+might almost say impossible--shapes; and they have done this within
+comparatively short periods, after which they have died out not less
+rapidly. It seems almost as if these go-ahead creatures had, by
+accepting every possible modification and carrying the same to the
+extreme, too quickly exhausted their plasticity--which, after all,
+must have limits--thereby becoming unable to meet successfully the
+requirements of further changes in their surroundings. The slowly
+developing groups, keeping within main lines of Evolution, and not
+being tempted into aberrant side-issues, had, after all, a much better
+chance of onward evolution.
+
+A good example of the former are the Dinosaurs. We do not know
+their ancestors; but we have here to deal only with their range of
+transformation. The oldest known forms occur in the Upper Trias; they
+attain their most stupendous development in the Upper Jurassic and in
+the Wealden; and they have died out with the Cretaceous epoch. But
+already some of their earliest forms had assumed bipedal gait, and the
+Oolitic Compsognathus had developed almost bird-like hind-limbs.
+
+On the other hand, there are many instances of extremely slow
+development--facts which raise the difficult question of 'persistent
+types.' Are these due to a state of perfection which cannot be improved
+upon? Or are they due to a kind of morphological consolidation (not
+necessarily specialization) which can no longer yield easily, so that
+therefore through changes in their surroundings they may come to an end
+sooner than more plastic groups?
+
+Struthio, the ostrich; Orycteropus, the Cape ant-eater; Tapirus, and
+many others, existed in the Miocene age practically as they are
+now; but pre-Pliocene dolphins, cats, monkeys, stags, all belong to
+closely-allied and well-defined 'genera,' but different from the living
+forms.
+
+Alligators and crocodiles are known from the Upper Chalk; Tomistoma
+since the Miocene; Gavialis since the Pliocene.
+
+The oldest surviving reptile is Sphenodon, the Hatteria of New Zealand,
+a fair representative of what generalized reptiles of the later
+Triassic period seem to have been like; and to the same period belongs
+Ceratodus, the Australian mud-fish, hitherto the oldest known surviving
+genus of a very ancient and low type so far as Vertebrata are concerned.
+
+Now let us see if the above estimates of geological time are so utterly
+inapplicable to animal evolution. On purpose we take one of the lowest
+estimates, about 28,000,000 years, and apportion them equally to the
+various strata or epochs.
+
+The original owner of the famous Trinil skull, a _Pithecanthropus
+erectus_, lived, according to some, in the Late Pliocene, according
+to others in the Early Plistocene, period--that is to say, somewhere
+about the beginning of our last Glacial epoch, some 270,000 years ago.
+Assuming that he and his like reached puberty at sixteen to twenty
+years of age, about 17,000 generations would lie between him and
+ourselves, or, to put it more forcibly, between him and the lowest
+living human races--say the Ceylonese Veddahs. Only 250 generations,
+at twenty years, carry us back to 3000 B.C. (_i.e._, beyond
+the ken of history); and if it be objected that the differences between
+the oldest inhabitants of Egypt, the Naquada, and the present Fellahin
+are very slight, we are welcome to multiply these differences sixty
+or seventy fold, in order to arrive at the Pithecanthropus level.
+But these Naquada had no metal implements, and there cannot be the
+slightest doubt that the development of the human race went on by leaps
+and bounds after certain discoveries had been made--to wit, the use
+of implements and that of fire. That creature which first took up a
+stone or a branch and wielded it thereby got such an enormous advantage
+over his fellow-creatures that his mental and bodily development went
+on apace. The same applies to the improvement of speech. We assume the
+single, monophyletic origin of mankind at one place, in one district;
+and the differences between some of the races of man are great enough
+to constitute what we might call species. Compare the Venus of Milo,
+that noble expression of the ancient Greeks' notion of female beauty,
+with the 'products of art' of the Veddahs or the dwarfs of Central
+Africa, or think of the beau-idéal which a Michael Angelo could
+possibly have evolved if he had never seen any but such people.
+
+ _TIME AND EVOLUTION_
+
+ ======================================================================
+ I. |II.| III. | IV. | V. |VI.| VII.
+ | | | | | |Generations.
+ -----------+---+-----------+----------+--------------+---+------------
+ |} |} |} |Adam and Eve | | 250
+ Recent |} 5|} |} |Man, contem- | | 3,500
+ Plistocene |} |} |} 270,000| porary with | |
+ | |} |} | Reindeer | |
+ | |} |} | in France | |
+ Pliocene -|} |} 3,000,000| |_Pithecanthro-| 16| 17,000
+ |} |} |} 600,000| pus erectus_| |
+ Miocene -|}10|} |} |Anthropoid | 10| 60,000
+ |} |} |}2,100,000| Apes | |
+ Eocene -|} |} |} |Lemures | 5| 420,000
+ | | | | | |
+ Cretaceous | 10|} | 3,600,000| | |
+ Jurassic - | 5|} | 1,800,000| | |
+ Rhætic -|} |} |} |Prototheria, | 3| 1,800,000
+ |} |} |} | or first | |
+ |} |} 7,200,000|} | Mammalia | |
+ Keuper -|} |} |}1,800,000| | |
+ Muschel- |} 5|} |} | | |
+ kalk |} |} |} | | |
+ New Red |} |} |} |Theromorpha | 4| 425,000
+ Sandstone| | | | | |
+ Magnesian |} |} |} | | |
+ Limestone|} |} |} | | |
+ Lower Red |} |} |} |Proreptilia | 4| 250,000
+ Sandstone|} |} |}4,000,000| | |
+ Coal- |}15|} |} |Eotetrapoda | 4| 500,000
+ measures |} |} |} | | |
+ Mountain |} |}17,500,000|} | | |
+ Limestone | |} | | | |
+ Devonian -| 15|} | 4,000,000|Dipnoi and | 5| 1,000,000
+ | |} | |Crossopterygii| |
+ Silurian -| 10|} | 2,700,000|First fishlike| 3| 900,000
+ | |} | | creatures | |
+ Ordovician | 10|} | 2,700,000| | |
+ Cambrian -| 15|} | 4,000,000| Sum total of| |
+ Laurentian | | | | generations| | ---------
+ Archæan | | | | (about) | | 5,375,000
+ or Meta- | | | | | |
+ morphic | | | | | |
+ ======================================================================
+
+EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE ON P. 149.
+
+ Column I. contains the names of the successive sedimentary strata.
+
+ " II. contains the percentage of the duration of the various epochs,
+ according to _Williams_, the time from the Cambrian until recent times
+ being taken as 100.
+
+ " III. gives the estimated duration in years of the Palæozoic,
+ Mesozoic, and Cænozoic periods, according to _Walcott_.
+
+ " IV. gives in years the duration of the various smaller epochs, as
+ computed from Walcott and Williams' statements.
+
+ " V. Representatives of stages of the ancestral line of man. The
+ names stand in the level of the stratum in which they have made their
+ first appearance.
+
+ " VI. contains the number of years which, in the present
+ calculation, have been assumed necessary for the animal to reach
+ puberty.
+
+ " VII. contains the number of generations which can have elapsed
+ from stage to stage. For example, 60,000 generations separate the
+ earliest known anthropoid apes from Pithecanthropus.
+
+Let us follow the descent of man further back. The next stage,
+reckoning backwards, is that from Pithecanthropus to _bonâ-fide_
+anthropoid apes. They are represented in the Miocene by various
+genera--_e.g._, Pliopithecus and Dryopithecus. According to Croll and
+Wallace, 850,000 years ago carry us into the Miocene epoch. Assuming
+that these apes lived about 600,000 years before Pithecanthropus,
+namely, in the later half of the Miocene, and taking puberty at ten
+years of age, a high estimate, we get not less than 60,000 generations.
+
+2. From Apes back to lowest Lemurs in the lowest Eocene. The date of
+Eocene being fixed at 3,000,000, we have about 2,100,000 years for this
+stage; assuming as much as five years for puberty, this results in
+420,000 generations.
+
+3. From Lemures to Prototheria. The earliest known mammalian remains
+come from the Rhætic, or top formation of the Triassic epoch; allowing
+for the Rhætic only 100,000 years, we have to add the whole of the
+Jurassic and Cretaceous, in all about 5,500,000 years. Assuming three
+years for a generation, we get 1,800,000 generations.
+
+4. From Prototheria to something like the Theromorpha at the bottom of
+the Triassic strata. A duration of 1,700,000 years divided by four
+gives 425,000 generations.
+
+5. From Theromorpha to Proreptilia, represented by Eryops and Cricotus
+from the Lower Permian of Texas. Allowing 1,000,000 years, each
+generation at four years, we obtain 250,000 generations.
+
+6. From Proreptilia to Eotetrapoda, the first terrestrial Vertebrata,
+represented by something like the Stegocephali, the earliest of which
+are known from the Coal-measures. Assuming them to have come into
+existence at the bottom of the Coal-measures, for the duration of which
+we may guess 2,000,000 years, we get, with four years' allowance for
+puberty, 500,000 generations.
+
+7. From Eotetrapoda to a not yet separated or differentiated group
+of Crossopterygian and Dipnoan fishes, both of which are known from
+Devonian strata. The duration of the latter has been computed at
+4,000,000 years, which, with 1,000,000 for the Mountain Limestone
+formation, gives us 5,000,000 for this stage. Assuming, for the sake
+of round numbers, as much as five years for a generation, we get
+1,000,000 generations.
+
+8. Earliest stage, down to the first fish-like creatures. Teeth and
+spines indicating the existence of fishes are known from the Upper
+Silurian. By carrying the earliest fishes down to the bottom of the
+Silurian, with 2,700,000 years' duration, and allowing three years for
+attaining puberty, the calculation results in 900,000 generations.
+
+Further back we cannot go. We do not know of any Vertebrate remains
+from the Ordovician and Cambrian, which together represent 6,700,000
+years, enough for at least half as many generations of Prochordate
+creatures. The pre-Cambrian or Laurentian epoch lies quite beyond the
+reach of calculation, nor have we any trustworthy fossil remains of
+living matter from these strata, to which, however, Haeckel and others
+refer the first beginnings of life.
+
+All the above calculations are, of course, only approximate. What we
+do know is the existence of representatives of the stages, our proofs
+being the fossils; but when we refer the origin of the Eotetrapoda,
+for example, to the bottom and not somewhere to the middle of the
+Coal-measures, we are guessing merely. Alterations in the levels
+assumed for the various stage-representatives will, of course, alter
+the result of the number of generations; but the leading idea, as
+a whole, is not thereby upset. The fact remains that in the Upper
+Silurian we have fishes; from the Coal-measures onwards, fishes and
+Amphibia; since the Permian, fishes, Amphibia, and reptiles; since the
+end of the Trias these three classes and the Mammalia; and lastly, at
+least since the Plistocene, man himself. If Evolution is true at all,
+the transformation from early fish-like creatures to man has come about
+within these epochs. Being able to assign a time of duration to each
+of them, with an approximate total of 21,000,000 years, we are also
+able to put the whole ancestral series to a test by expressing each
+great stage in generations. The result is very satisfactory. The whole
+enormous stretch from the lowest fish-like creatures to man has been
+resolved into more than 5,000,000 successive generations, and each of
+these means a little step forwards in onward Evolution.
+
+Nothing is to be gained for the understanding of our problem of
+Evolution if we multiply this enormous number of generations by ten
+or any other multiple. We are not able to conceive changes so small
+as those which necessarily have existed between Pithecanthropus and
+man if the whole striking difference is analysed into 17,000 steps.
+Every one of these stages in the modifications of the muscles, the
+skeletal framework, increase of brain, shortening of the trunk,
+lengthening of the legs, improvement of the hands, loss of the hairy
+coat, etc., is truly microscopical, imperceptible, just as the
+Evolutionist imagines the whole process to have been. Again, where is
+the difficulty implied by the change from an air-breathing, in many
+structural points half-amphibian, fish into a primitive land-crawling
+four-footed creature, if we are allowed to resolve the transformation
+into 1,000,000 stages? So far from there being any difficulty, rather
+does it appear questionable if so many infinitely small changes have
+been necessary to bring about this result.
+
+One thousand years make apparently no difference in the evolution of
+animals, nor does one second change the aspect of the hands on the
+face of a clock, nor did Julius Cæsar's commission of scientific men
+appreciate the error of about eleven minutes in the length of the year
+beyond its real value; but now the Russians are, owing to this neglect,
+nearly two weeks behind the civilized nations.
+
+
+ THE END.
+
+
+ BILLING AND SONS, PRINTERS, GUILDFORD.
+
+
+ By PROFESSOR ERNST HAECKEL
+
+
+ MONISM;
+ OR,
+ The Confession of Faith of a Man of Science.
+
+ Translated from the German by J. D. F. GILCHRIST.
+
+ _Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 1s. 6d. net._
+
+'We may readily admit that Professor Haeckel has stated his case with
+the clearness and courage which we should expect of him, and that
+his lecture may be regarded as a fair and authoritative statement
+of the views now held by a large number of scientifically educated
+people.'--_Times._
+
+'The Monism, which is the substance of his faith, is thus defined by
+him: "Our conviction that there lives one spirit in all things, and
+that the whole cognizable world is constituted, and has been developed,
+in accordance with one common fundamental law." As the confession
+of a distinguished man of science, this little work deserves to be
+read.'--_North British Daily Mail._
+
+'This "Confession of Faith" was delivered by the great German
+scientist, its author, as an extemporaneous address at Altenburg
+rather more than two years ago. There are, no doubt, a large number of
+English readers who will welcome a translation, for this "connecting of
+religion and science" has long troubled many earnest students of modern
+science.'--_Publisher's Circular._
+
+'This is a little book of great daring, an example of the wild
+speculative flights of one of the very ablest and greatest of our
+contemporary men of science.'--_Aberdeen Free Press._
+
+'The address, whatever we may think of its conclusions, is, however,
+most interesting reading, and is admirably done into English by the
+translator.'--_Literary World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., price 7s. 6d. net._
+
+ SOURCES OF THE APOSTOLIC
+ CANONS.
+
+ _With a Treatise on the Origin of the Readership and other Lower Orders._
+
+ By Professor ADOLF HARNACK.
+
+ Translated by LEONARD A. WHEATLEY.
+
+ _With an Introductory Essay on the Organization of the Early Church
+ and the Evolution of the Reader._
+
+ By the Rev. JOHN OWEN, Author of 'Evenings with the Skeptics.'
+
+'Dr. Adolf Harnack is at the present time undoubtedly the leading
+liberal authority in Germany on matters connected with early Christian
+history.'--_The Times._
+
+'Those who are interested in early Church history know how to prize
+anything from the pen of Prof. Harnack. They will not be disappointed
+with the present paper, in which, with his accustomed learning and
+acute criticism, he annotates and comments upon the fragments of
+primitive church law which partly form the basis of the Apostolic
+Canons.'--_British Weekly._
+
+'The wide circulation of this volume would be of the happiest augury
+for a more scientific and worthy conception of the organization of the
+primitive Church.'--Dr. MARCUS DODS in _The Bookman_.
+
+
+
+ _Crown 8vo., cloth, price 1s. 6d. net._
+
+ CHRISTIANITY AND HISTORY.
+
+ By ADOLF HARNACK.
+
+ Translated, with the Author's sanction, by THOMAS BAILEY
+ SAUNDERS, with an Introductory Note.
+
+'It is highly interesting and full of thought. The short introductory
+note with which Mr. Saunders prefaces it is valuable for its
+information and excellent in its tone.'--_Athenæum._
+
+'A singularly able exposition and defence of Christianity, as seen in
+the newer light, by one of the most learned and acute "evangelical"
+critics of Germany. The essay is a masterly one.'--_Glasgow Herald._
+
+' ... We hope the lecture will be widely read.'--_Primitive Methodist
+Quarterly Review._
+
+'The lecture itself is weighty in its every word, and should be read
+and re-read by those desiring to have in a nutshell the central
+positions of modern Christianity.'--_Christian World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Third Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth, price 5s._
+
+ SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF
+ ISRAEL AND JUDAH.
+
+ By J. WELLHAUSEN,
+ PROFESSOR AT MARBURG.
+
+'This work is now issued for the third time as an independent treatise.
+It admirably epitomizes the subject, and exhibits on almost every page
+evidences of Professor Wellhausen's profound study.'--_Publishers'
+Circular._
+
+'We would only say that those who differ from his critical views will
+yet do well to study them, and to read this history in which he applies
+them. Its separate publication, in a handy form and at a moderate
+price, makes it generally accessible.'--_North British Daily Mail._
+
+'The publication in a separate form of Professor Wellhausen's article
+in the "Encyclopædia Britannica" on "Israel" will be very warmly
+welcomed by many readers.'--_Manchester Guardian._
+
+'We are very glad to welcome an edition of Professor Wellhausen's
+"Sketch of the History of Israel and Judah" in a convenient and handy
+form. This is the first time it has appeared in a separate form. It is
+already known to students; it ought now to become popular. It is based
+on the learned author's studies in Hebrew literature and history, and,
+though not controversial in form, it differs totally from orthodox
+presentations of the subject.'--_Westminster Review._
+
+'A sketch which has created such widespread and profound interest as
+this could not be kept in the pages of a voluminous encyclopædia.
+Wellhausen's words necessarily have exceptional importance, even in
+the esteem of those who differ from him _toto coelo_.'--_Baptist
+Magazine._
+
+'The profound scholarship of the author does not elevate his writing
+above the interest of the general reader, and a vivid idea of the
+involved Jewish history is obtainable from this volume.'--_Christian
+Advocate._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., boards, price 3s. 6d. net._
+
+ A CLASSIFICATION OF
+ VERTEBRATA,
+ RECENT AND EXTINCT.
+
+ With Diagnoses and Definitions, a Chapter on Geographical
+ Distribution, and an Etymological Index.
+
+ By HANS GADOW, M.A., PH.D., F.R.S.,
+
+ STRICKLAND CURATOR AND LECTURER ON ZOOLOGY TO THE UNIVERSITY,
+ CAMBRIDGE.
+
+'At the end of his work Dr. Gadow adds a useful chapter on the
+geographical distribution of the Vertebrata, with a table showing
+the approximate number of the known recent species. He also gives
+a fanciful though striking calculation to show how some groups are
+still in the ascendant, while others are distinctly declining. The
+little volume is indeed a welcome addition to the biological student's
+library, and it deserves the wide circulation which its author's
+eminence is likely to ensure for it.'--_Natural Science._
+
+'It is a book, it need hardly be said, for the student; it is simply
+a list of the principal sub-divisions of backboned animals, with just
+as much definition as is needed. It may be regarded as an exceedingly
+concentrated extract of a full text-book of the vertebrates.'--_Daily
+Chronicle._
+
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., cloth, price 21s._
+
+ IN NORTHERN SPAIN.
+
+ By Dr. HANS GADOW, M.A., PH.D., F.R.S.
+
+ _Containing Map and 89 Illustrations._
+
+'Some years back "Wild Spain," one of the best books of its kind,
+made you desirous of knowing more of the country. And Hans Gadow has
+deepened this feeling in his excellent volume "In Northern Spain,"
+and that to an enormous extent. Dwelling at inn or farm, or in their
+own tent, they saw the country as it has been seen but rarely, and
+they came to know the inhabitants as they can be known in no other
+fashion.'--_Black and White._
+
+'To persons visiting the provinces with which the author deals, this
+book will be invaluable, and will do more to point their attention to
+objects of interest than existing guide-books of Spain, most of which
+are out of date.'--_The Field._
+
+'About the best book of European travel that has appeared these many
+years.'--_Literary World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+Transcriber's Notes
+
+ Variations in spelling, punctuation and hyphenation have been retained
+ except in obvious cases of typographical errors.
+ Inconsistent hyphenation and spelling are as in the oringinal.
+ Italics are shown thus _italic_ and underline thus *underline*.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel
+
+*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44541 ***
diff --git a/44541-h/44541-h.htm b/44541-h/44541-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..924c8b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44541-h/44541-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,5195 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel.
+ </title>
+<link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+body {
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+h1
+{
+ margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em;
+ text-align: center;
+ font-size: x-large;
+ font-weight: normal;
+ line-height: 1.6;
+}
+ h2,h3{
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+.spaced
+{
+ line-height: 1.5;
+}
+
+.space-above
+{
+ margin-top: 3em;
+}
+
+p
+{
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+}
+
+ .small {font-size: small;}
+ .medium {font-size: medium;}
+ .large {font-size: large;}
+
+hr {
+ width: 33%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+hr.tb {width: 45%;}
+hr.chap {width: 65%}
+hr.full {width: 95%;}
+
+table {
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+}
+
+ .tdl {text-align: left;}
+ .tdr {text-align: right;}
+ .tdc {text-align: center;}
+
+.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
+ visibility: hidden;
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 92%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: right;
+} /* page numbers */
+
+.linenum {
+ position: absolute;
+ top: auto;
+ left: 4%;
+} /* poetry number */
+
+.blockquot {
+ margin-left: 5%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+.center {text-align: center;}
+
+.right {text-align: right;}
+
+.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+
+.u {text-decoration: underline;}
+
+@media handheld
+
+{.chapter-beginning
+ {page-break-before: always;}
+}
+
+/* Images */
+.figcenter {
+ margin: auto;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+/* Footnotes */
+.footnotes {border: dashed 1px;}
+
+.footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
+
+.footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;}
+
+.fnanchor {
+ vertical-align: super;
+ font-size: .8em;
+ text-decoration:
+ none;
+}
+
+/* Transcriber's notes */
+.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA;
+ color: black;
+ font-size:smaller;
+ padding:0.5em;
+ margin-bottom:5em;
+ font-family:sans-serif, serif; }
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44541 ***</div>
+
+<h1>THE LAST LINK</h1>
+
+<p class="center">OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE
+ DESCENT OF MAN</p>
+
+<p class="center space-above"><small>BY</small><br />
+ERNST HAECKEL<br />
+<small>(JENA)</small></p>
+
+<p class="center space-above"><small>WITH NOTES AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES<br />
+BY</small><br />
+HANS GADOW, F.R.S.<br />
+<small>(CAMBRIDGE)</small></p>
+
+
+<p class="center space-above">LONDON<br />
+ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK<br />
+1898</p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+
+<h2>CONTENTS.</h2>
+
+<table id="toc" summary="contents">
+<tr>
+ <td>&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><span class="smcap">page</span></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"><big>THE LAST LINK</big></td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; INTRODUCTORY</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_8">8</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; PALÆONTOLOGY</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_20">20</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; OTHER EVIDENCE</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_42">42</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; STAGES RECAPITULATED</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_47">47</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"><big>BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES:</big></td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; LAMARCK, SAINT-HILAIRE, CUVIER, BAER,</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; MUELLER, VIRCHOW, COPE, KOELLIKER, GEGENBAUR,</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; HAECKEL</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_80">80</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">THEORY OF CELLS</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_115">115</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">FACTORS OF EVOLUTION</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_117">117</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_135">135</a></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+
+<hr class="chap" />
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+
+<h2>NOTE</h2>
+
+
+<p>The address I delivered on August 26 at the
+Fourth International Congress of Zoology at
+Cambridge, 'On our Present Knowledge of
+the Descent of Man,' has, I find, from the
+high significance of the theme and the
+general importance of the questions connected
+with it, excited much interest, and
+has led to requests for its publication.
+Hence this volume, edited by my friend
+Dr. H. Gadow, my pupil in earlier days,
+who has not only revised the text, but has
+also enriched it by many valuable additions
+and notes.</p>
+
+<p class="right">ERNST HAECKEL.</p>
+
+<p><small><i>Jena, December, 1898.</i></small></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap" />
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>THE LAST LINK</h2>
+
+
+<p>At the end of the nineteenth century, the
+age of 'natural science,' the department of
+knowledge that has made most progress is
+zoology. From zoology has arisen the study
+of transformism, which now dominates the
+whole of biology. Lamarck<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> laid its foundation
+in 1809, and forty years ago Charles
+Darwin obtained for it a recognition which
+is now universal. It is not my task to repeat
+the well-known principles of Darwinism. I
+am not concerned to explain the scientific
+value of the whole theory of descent. The
+whole of our biological study is pervaded by
+it. No general problem in zoology and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</a></span>
+botany, in anatomy and physiology, can be
+discussed without the question arising, How
+has this problem originated? What are the
+real causes of its development?</p>
+
+<p>This question was almost unknown seventy
+years ago, when Charles Darwin, the great
+reformer of biology, began his academical
+career at Cambridge as a student of theology.
+In the same year, 1828, Carl Ernst von
+Baer<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> published in Germany his classical
+work on the embryology of animals, the first
+successful attempt to elucidate by 'observation
+and reflection' the mysterious origin
+of the animal body from the egg, and to
+explain in every respect the 'history of the
+growing individuality.' Darwin at that time
+had no knowledge of this great advance, and
+he could not divine that forty years later
+embryology would be one of the strongest
+supports of his own life's work&mdash;of that very
+theory of transformism which, founded by
+Lamarck in the year of Darwin's birth,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</a></span>
+was accepted with enthusiasm by Charles's
+grandfather Erasmus. There is no doubt
+that of all the celebrated naturalists of the
+nineteenth century Darwin achieved the
+greatest success, and we should be justified
+in designating the last forty years as the
+Age of Darwin.</p>
+
+<p>In searching for the causes of this unexampled
+success, we must clearly separate
+three sets of considerations: first, the comprehensive
+reform of Lamarck's transformism,
+and its firm establishment by the many
+arguments drawn from modern biology;
+secondly, the construction of the new theory
+of selection, as established by Darwin, and
+independently by Alfred Wallace (a theory
+called Darwinism in the proper sense);
+thirdly, the deduction of anthropogeny, that
+most important conclusion of the theory of
+descent, the value of which far surpasses all
+the other truths in evolution.</p>
+
+<p>It is the third point of Darwin's theory
+that I shall discuss here; and I shall discuss<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span>
+it chiefly with the intention of examining
+critically the evidence and the different
+conclusions which at present represent our
+scientific knowledge of the descent of man
+and of the different stages of his animal
+pedigree.</p>
+
+<p>It is now generally admitted that this
+problem is the most important of all biological
+questions. Huxley was right when
+in 1863 he called it the question of questions
+for mankind. The problem which underlies
+all others, and is more deeply interesting than
+any other, is as to the place which man
+occupies in nature and his relations to the
+universe of things. 'Whence our race has
+come; what are the limits of our power over
+nature, and of nature's power over us; to
+what goal are we tending&mdash;these are the
+problems which present themselves anew
+and with undiminished interest to every man
+born into the world.' This impressive view
+was explained by Huxley thirty-five years ago
+in his three celebrated essays on 'Evidence<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span>
+as to Man's Place in Nature.' The first is
+entitled 'On the Natural History of the Man-like
+Apes'; the second, 'On the Relations of
+Man to the Lower Animals'; the third, 'On
+some Fossil Remains of Man.' Darwin himself
+felt the burden of these problems as much
+as Huxley; but in his chief work, 'On the
+Origin of Species,' in 1859, he had purposely
+only just touched them, suggesting that the
+theory of descent would shed light upon the
+origin of man and his history. Twelve years
+later, in his celebrated work on 'The Descent
+of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex,'
+Darwin discussed fully and ingeniously all
+the different sides of this 'question of
+questions' from the morphological, historical,
+physiological, and psychological points of
+view. As early as 1866 I myself had applied
+in the <i>Generelle Morphologie der Organismen</i>
+the theory of transformism to anthropology,
+and had shown that the fundamental law of
+biogeny claims the same value for man as for
+all the other animals. The intimate causal<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</a></span>
+connection between ontogeny and phylogeny,
+between the development of the individual and
+the history of its ancestors, enables us to gain
+a safe and certain knowledge of our ancestral
+series. I had at that time distinguished in
+this series ten chief degrees of vertebrate
+organization. I attributed the highest importance
+to the logical connection of anthropogeny
+with transformism. If the latter be
+true, the truth of the former is absolute.
+'Our theory that man is descended from
+lower vertebrates, and immediately from apes
+or primates, is a case of special <i>deduction</i>
+which follows with absolute certainty from the
+general <i>induction</i> of the theory of descent.'
+The full proof and detailed explanation of
+this view was afterwards given in my
+'History of Natural Creation,' and especially
+in my 'Anthropogeny.'<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> Lastly, it has
+received an ample scientific and critical
+foundation in the third part of my 'Systematic
+Phylogeny.'<sup>[3]</sup></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span></p>
+<p>During the forty years which have elapsed
+since Darwin's first publication of his theories
+an enormous literature, discussing the <i>general
+problems</i> of transformism as well as its special
+application to man, has been published. In
+spite of the wide divergence of the different
+views, all agree in one main point: the
+natural development of man cannot be separated
+from general transformism. There are
+only two possibilities. Either all the various
+species of animals and plants have been
+created independently by supernatural forces
+(and in this case the creation of man also is a
+miracle); or the species have been produced
+in a natural way by transmutation, by adaptation
+and progressive heredity (and in this
+case man also is descended from other vertebrates,
+and immediately from a series of
+primates). We are absolutely convinced that
+only the latter theory is fully scientific. To
+prove its truth, we have to examine critically
+the strength of the different arguments claimed
+for it.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+
+<h2>I.</h2>
+
+
+<p>First, we have to consider the relative
+place which comparative anatomy concedes
+to man in the 'natural system' of animals,
+for the true value of our 'natural classification'
+is based upon its meaning as a pedigree.
+All the minor and major groups of the system&mdash;the
+classes, legions, orders, families, genera,
+and species&mdash;are only different branches of
+the same pedigree. For man himself, his
+place in the pedigree has been fixed since
+Lamarck,<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> in 1801, defined the group of
+vertebrates. The most perfect<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> of these are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span>
+the Mammalia; and at the head of this class
+stands the order of Primates, in which Linnæus,
+in 1735, united four 'genera'&mdash;Homo,
+Simia, Lemur, and Vespertilio. If we exclude
+the last-named, the Chiroptera of modern
+zoology, there remain three natural groups of
+Primates&mdash;the Lemures, the Simiæ, and the
+Anthropi or Hominidæ. This is the classification<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span>
+of the majority of zoologists; but if we
+compare man with the two chief groups of
+monkeys&mdash;the Eastern monkeys (or Catarrhinæ)
+and the Western or American monkeys
+(Platyrrhinæ)&mdash;there can be no doubt that the
+former group is much more closely related to
+man than is the latter. In the natural order
+of the Catarrhinæ we find united a long series
+of lower and higher forms. The lowest, the
+Cynopitheci, appear still closely related to
+the Platyrrhinæ and to the Lemures; while,
+on the other hand, the tailless apes (Anthropomorphæ)
+approach man through their
+higher organization. Hence one of our best
+authorities on the Primates, Robert Hartmann,<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a>
+proposed to subdivide the whole
+order of the Simiæ into three groups:</p>
+
+<p>(1) Primarii, man together with the other
+Anthropomorphæ, or tailless apes; (2)
+Simiæ, all the other monkeys; (3) Prosimiæ,
+or Lemurs. This arrangement has received<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span>
+strong support from the interesting discovery
+by Selenka that the peculiar placentation of
+the human embryo is the same as in the
+great apes, and different from that of all the
+other monkeys. Our choice between these
+different classifications of Primates is best
+determined by the important thesis of Huxley,
+in which, in 1863, he carried out a most careful
+and critical comparison of all the anatomical
+gradations within this order. In my opinion,
+this ingenious thesis&mdash;which I have called the
+Huxleyan Law, or the 'Pithecometra-thesis
+of Huxley'&mdash;is of the utmost value. It runs
+as follows: 'Thus, whatever system of
+organs be studied, the comparison of their
+modifications in the ape-series leads to one
+and the same result&mdash;that the structural
+differences which separate man from the
+gorilla and the chimpanzee are not so great
+as those which separate the gorilla from the
+lower apes.' If we accept the Huxleyan
+law without prejudice, and apply it to the
+natural classification of the Primates, we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span>
+must concede that man's place is within the
+order of the Simiæ. On examining this
+relation with care, and judging with logical
+persistence, we may even go a step further.
+Instead of the wider conception of 'Simiæ,'
+we must use the restricted term of Catarrhinæ,
+and our Pithecometra-thesis has then
+to be formulated as follows: <i>The comparative
+anatomy of all organs of the group of Catarrhine
+Simiæ leads to the result that the
+morphological differences between man and
+the great apes are not so great as are those
+between the man-like apes and the lowest
+Catarrhinæ</i>. In fact, it is very difficult to
+show why man should not be classed with
+the large apes in the same zoological family.
+We all know a man from an ape; but it is
+quite another thing to find differences which
+are absolute and not of degree only. Speaking
+generally, we may say that man alone
+combines the four following features: (1)
+Erect walk; (2) extremities differentiated
+accordingly; (3) articulate speech; (4) higher<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span>
+reasoning power. Speech and reason are
+obviously relative distinctions only&mdash;the direct
+result of more brains and more brain-power,
+the so-called mental faculties. The erect walk
+is not an absolutely distinguishing characteristic:
+the large apes likewise walk on their
+feet only, supporting their bodies by touching
+the ground with the backs of their hands&mdash;in
+fact, with their knuckles&mdash;and this is a mode
+of progression very different from that of the
+tailed monkeys, which walk upon the palms
+of their hands. There are, however, two
+obvious differences in the development of
+the muscles. In man alone the gastrocnemius
+and the soleus muscle are thick
+enough to form the calf of the leg, and
+the glutæus maximus is enlarged into the
+buttocks. A fourth glutæal muscle occurs
+occasionally in man, while it is constantly
+present in apes as the so-called musculus
+scansorius. Concerning the muscles of the
+whole body, we cannot do better than quote
+Testut's summary: 'The mass of recorded<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span>
+observations upon the muscular anomalies in
+man is so great, and the agreement of many
+of these with the condition normal in apes is so
+marked, that the gap which usually separates
+the muscular system of man from that of the
+apes appears to be completely bridged over.'</p>
+
+<p>There are, for example, the muscles of the
+ear. In most people the majority, or even
+all of them, are no longer movable at will,
+while in the apes they are still in use. The
+important point, however, is that these
+muscles are still present in man, although
+often in a reduced condition. They are the
+following: (1) Musculus auricularis anterior
+or attrahens auris, which is frequently much
+reduced and no longer reaches the ear at all,
+being then absolutely useless; (2) Musculus
+auricularis superior or attollens auris, more
+constant than the former; (3) Musculus
+auricularis posterior or retrahens auris, likewise
+often functional. Occasionally smaller
+slips differentiated from these three muscles
+are present, and as so-called intrinsic muscles<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</a><br /><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</a></span>
+are restricted to the ear itself; their function
+is, or was, that of curling up or opening the
+external ear.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter"><a href="./images/i_0231.jpg">
+ <img src="./images/i_0231.jpg" alt="Outlines of the Left Ear"></img></a>
+</div>
+<p class="center"><span class="smcap">Outlines of the Left Ear of&mdash;</span></p>
+
+<blockquote>
+<p><small>1. <i>Lemur macaco</i>; 2. <i>Macacus rhesus</i>, the Rhesus monkey;
+3. Cercopithecus, a macaque; 4. human embryo of six months;
+5. man, with Darwin's point well retained: the dotted outline is that
+of the ear of a baboon; 6. orang-utan (after G. Schwalbe):<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> <sup>x</sup> the
+original tip of the ear; 7. human ear with the principal muscles.</small></p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>In connection with the ear, I may touch
+upon another interesting and most suggestive
+little feature which is present in many
+individuals&mdash;namely, 'Darwin's point.' This
+is the last remnant of the original tip of the
+ear, before the outer, upper, and hinder rim
+became doubled up or folded in. It is a
+feature quite useless, and absolutely impossible
+of interpretation, excepting as the vestige of
+such previous ancestral conditions as are
+normal in the monkeys.</p>
+
+<p>In some cases the reduction of muscles
+has proceeded further in apes than in man&mdash;for
+example, the muscles of the little toe.
+Another instance is afforded by the coccyx or
+vestige of the tail; this is still furnished with
+muscles which are now in man, as well as in
+the apes, quite useless, and vary considerably
+with every sign of degeneration, most so in
+the orang-utan.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Darwin has mentioned the frequent action
+of the 'snarling muscle,' by which, in sneering,
+our upper canine teeth are exposed, like those
+of a dog prepared to fight.</p>
+
+<p>Monkeys and apes possess vocal sacs,
+especially large in the orang-utan; survivals
+of them, although no longer used, persist in
+man in the shape of a pair of small diverticula,
+the pouches of Morgagni, between the
+true and the false vocal cords.</p>
+
+<p>'In the native Australians, the dental formula
+appears least removed from the hypothetical
+original type, for in it are still found
+complete rows of splendid teeth, with powerfully-developed
+canines and molars, the latter
+being either uniform, or even increasing in
+size, as we proceed backwards, in such a
+way that the wisdom tooth is the largest of
+the series. This is decidedly a pithecoid
+characteristic which is always found in apes.
+The upper incisors of the Malay, apart from
+their prognathous disposition, have occasionally
+a distinctly pithecoid form, their anterior<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span>
+surface being convex, and their lingual surface
+slightly concave. The ancestors of
+Europeans seem to have had the same form
+of teeth, for the oldest existing fragments of
+skulls from the Mammoth age (<i>e.g.</i>, the jaws
+from La Naulette, in Belgium) reveal tooth-forms
+which must be classed with those of
+the lowest races of to-day.'<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
+
+<p>Now we are able to apply this fundamental
+Pithecometra-thesis directly to the classification
+of the Primates and to the phylogeny of
+man, which is intimately connected with it,
+because in this order, as in all the other
+groups of animals, the natural system is the
+clear expression of true phylogenetic affinity.
+Four results follow from our thesis: (1) The
+Primates, as the highest legion or order of
+mammals, form one natural, monophyletic
+group. All the Lemures, Simiæ, and
+Homines descend from one common ancestral<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span>
+form, from a hypothetical 'Archiprimas.'
+(2) The Lemures are the older and
+lower of the natural groups of the Primates;
+they stand between the oldest Placentalia
+(Prochoriata) and the true Simiæ. (3) All
+the Catarrhinæ, or Eastern Simiæ, form one
+natural monophyletic group. Their hypothetical
+common ancestor, the Archipithecus,
+may have descended directly or indirectly
+from a branch of the Lemures. (4) Man
+is descended directly from one series of
+extinct Catarrhine ancestors. The more
+recent ancestors of this series were tailless
+anthropoids (similar to the Anthropopithecus),
+with five sacral vertebræ. The
+more remote ancestors were tailed Cercopitheci,
+with three or four sacral vertebræ.</p>
+
+<p>These four theses possess, in my opinion,
+absolute certainty. They are independent of
+all future anatomical, embryological, and
+palæontological discoveries which may possibly
+throw more light upon the details of
+our phyletic anthropogenesis.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>II.</h2>
+
+
+<p>The next question is, how the facts of
+palæontology agree with these most important
+results of comparative anatomy and ontogeny.
+The fossils are the true historical 'medals of
+creation,' the palpable evidence of the historical
+succession of all those innumerable
+organic forms which have peopled the globe
+for many millions of years. Here the question
+arises, If the known fossil specimens of Mammalia,
+and particularly of Primates, give proof
+of these Pithecometra-theses, do they confirm
+directly the descent of man from ape-like
+creatures? The answer to this question
+is, in my opinion, affirmative.</p>
+
+<p>It is true that the gaps in the palæontological
+evidence, here as elsewhere, are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span>
+many and keenly felt. In the order of the
+Primates they are greater than in many
+other orders, chiefly because of the arboreal
+life of our ancestors. The explanation is very
+simple. It is really due to a long chain of
+favourable coincidences if the skeleton of a
+vertebrate, covered as it was with flesh and
+skin, and containing still more perishable
+viscera, is petrified at all. The body may be
+devoured by other creatures, and its bones
+scattered about; or it rots away and crumbles
+to pieces. Many animals hide in thick undergrowth
+when death approaches them; and,
+leading an almost entirely arboreal life, the
+Primates are especially likely to disappear
+without being fossilized. It is only when the
+body is quickly covered with sand, or is embedded
+in suitable lime or silica containing
+mud, that the process of petrifaction can
+come to pass. Even then it is only by great
+good luck that we come across such a fossil.
+Very few countries have been searched
+systematically, and the areas that have been<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</a></span>
+searched amount to little in comparison with
+the whole surface of the land, even if we
+leave out of account the fact that more than
+two-thirds of the globe are covered by water.</p>
+
+<p>These deplorable deficiencies of empirical
+palæontology are balanced on the other side
+by a growing number of positive facts, which
+possess an inestimable value in human
+phylogeny. The most interesting and most
+important of these is the celebrated fossil
+<i>Pithecanthropus erectus</i>, discovered in Java
+in 1894 by Dr. Eugène Dubois.<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> Three
+years ago this now famous ape-like man
+provoked an animated discussion at the third
+International Zoological Congress at Leyden.
+I may therefore be allowed to say a few
+words as to its scientific significance. Unfortunately,
+the fossil remains of this creature
+are very scanty: the skull-cap, a femur, and
+two teeth. It is obviously impossible to form<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span>
+from these scanty remains a complete and
+satisfactory reconstruction of this remarkable
+Pliocene Primate.</p>
+
+<p>The more important points are the following:
+The remains in question rested upon a
+conglomerate which lies upon a bed of marine
+marl and sand of Pliocene age. Together
+with the bones of Pithecanthropus were found
+those of Stegodon, Leptobos, Rhinoceros, Sus,
+Felis, Hyæna, Hippopotamus, Tapir, Elephas,
+and a gigantic Pangolin. It is remarkable
+that the first two of these genera are now
+extinct, and that neither hippopotamus nor
+hyæna exists any longer in the Oriental region.
+If we may judge from these fossil remains,
+the bones of Pithecanthropus are not younger
+than the oldest Pleistocene, and probably
+belong to the upper Pliocene. The teeth
+are like those of man. The femur, also, is
+very human, but shows some resemblances
+to that of the gibbons. Its size, however,
+indicates an animal which stood when erect
+not less than 5 feet 6 inches high. The<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span>
+skull-cap also is very human, but with very
+prominent eyebrow ridges, like those of
+the famous Neanderthal cranium. It is
+certainly not that of an idiot. It had an
+estimated cranial capacity of about 1,000
+cubic centimetres&mdash;that is to say, much
+more than that of the largest ape, which
+possesses not more than 600 c.c. The crania
+of female Australians and Veddahs measure
+not more than 1,100, some even less than
+1,000 c.c.; but, as these Veddah women stand
+only about 4 feet 9 inches high, the computed
+cranial capacity of the much taller Pithecanthropus
+is comparatively very low indeed.<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter"><a href="./images/i_0331.jpg">
+ <img src="./images/i_0331.jpg" alt="Skulls"></img></a>
+</div>
+
+<blockquote>
+<p><small>The upper figure represents the outlines of the skull of Pithecanthropus,
+as restored by Manouvier.<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> The lower figure shows the
+comparative size and shape of Pithecanthropus, the Neanderthal
+skull, a specimen of the Cro-Magnon race of neolithic France, and a
+Young Chimpanzee before the full development of the supraorbital
+crests</small>.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>The final result of the long discussion at
+Leyden was that, of twelve experts present,
+three held that the fossil remains belonged
+to a low race of man; three declared them
+to be those of a man-like ape of great size;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</a><br /><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span>
+the rest maintained that they belonged to an
+intermediate form, which directly connected
+primitive man with the anthropoid apes.
+This last view is the right one, and accords
+with the laws of logical inference. <i>Pithecanthropus
+erectus</i> of Dubois is truly a
+Pliocene remainder of that famous group of
+highest Catarrhines which were the immediate
+pithecoid ancestors of man. He is, indeed, the
+long-searched-for 'missing link,' for which, in
+1866, I myself had proposed the hypothetical
+genus Pithecanthropus, species Alalus.</p>
+
+<p>It must, however, be admitted that this
+opinion is still strongly combated by some
+distinguished authorities. At the Leyden
+Congress it was attacked by the illustrious
+pathologist Rudolf Virchow.<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> He, however,
+is one of the minority of leading men of
+science who set themselves to refute the
+theory of Evolution in every possible way.
+For thirty years he has defended the thesis:
+'It is quite certain that man is not a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span>
+descendant of apes.' He declares any intermediate
+form to be unimaginable save in a
+dream.</p>
+
+<p>Virchow went to the Leyden Congress
+with the set purpose of disproving that the
+bones found by Dubois belonged to a creature
+which linked together apes and man. First,
+he maintained that the skull was that of an
+ape, while the thigh belonged to man. This
+insinuation was at once refuted by the expert
+palæontologists, who declared that without
+the slightest doubt the bones belonged to
+one and the same individual. Next, Virchow
+explained that certain exostoses or growths
+observable on the thigh proved its human
+nature, since only under careful treatment
+the patient could have healed the original
+injury. Thereupon Professor Marsh, the
+celebrated palæontologist, exhibited a number
+of thigh-bones of wild monkeys which
+showed similar exostoses and had healed
+without hospital treatment. As a last argument
+the Berlin pathologist declared that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span>
+the deep constriction behind the upper
+margin of the orbits proved that the skull
+was that of an ape, as such never occurred in
+man. It so happened that a few weeks later
+Professor Nehring of Berlin demonstrated
+exactly the same formation on a human prehistoric
+skull received by him from Santos,
+in Brazil.</p>
+
+<p>Virchow was, in fact, just as unlucky in
+Leyden in his fight with our pliocene
+ancestor as he had been unfortunate in his
+opinion on the famous skulls of Neanderthal,
+Spy, La Naulette, etc., every one of which he
+explained as a pathological abnormality. It
+would be a very curious coincidence indeed if
+all these and other fossil human remains
+were those of idiots or otherwise abnormal
+individuals, provided they are old and low
+enough in their organization to be of phylogenetic
+value to the unbiassed zoologist.</p>
+
+<p>As the sworn adversary of Evolution,
+transformism, and Darwinism in particular,
+but a believer in the constancy of species, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</a></span>
+great and renowned pathologist has been
+driven to the incredible contention that all
+variations of organic forms are pathological.</p>
+
+<p>Four years ago, as honorary president of
+the Anthropological Congress at Vienna, he
+attacked Darwinism in the severest manner,
+and declared that 'man may be as well
+descended from the elephant or from the
+sheep as from the ape.' Such attacks on the
+theory of transformism indicate a failure to
+understand the principles of the theory of
+Evolution and to appreciate the significance
+of palæontology, comparative anatomy, and
+ontogeny.</p>
+
+<p>The thousands of other objections which
+have been made during the last forty years
+(chiefly by outsiders) may be passed over in
+silence. They do not require serious refutation.
+In spite of, or perhaps because of,
+these attacks, the theory of Evolution stands
+established more firmly than ever.</p>
+
+<p>It is easy for the outsider to exult over the
+difficulties which our problem implies&mdash;diffi<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span>culties
+which we who have given our lives to
+the study understand likewise, and try our
+best not only to bridge over, but also to
+point out. Anyhow, we do not conceal
+them; while those who reject the explanation
+offered by Evolution make the most of the
+gaps, and pass silently over the far more
+numerous points favourable to our theory.</p>
+
+<p>How fruitful during the last thirty years
+the astonishing progress in our palæontological
+knowledge has been for our Pithecometra-thesis
+is best shown by a short glance
+at the growth of our knowledge of fossil
+Primates. Cuvier,<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> the founder of palæontology,
+continued up to the time of his death,
+in 1832, to assert that fossil remains of
+monkeys and lemurs did not exist. The
+only skull of a fossil lemuroid which he described
+(namely, Adapis) he declared to be
+that of an ungulate. Not until 1836 were
+the first fragments of extinct monkeys found
+in India; it was two years later, near Athens,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span>
+that the skeleton of <i>Mesopithecus penthelicus</i>
+was discovered. Other remains of lemurs
+were found in 1862. But during the last
+twenty years the number of fossil Primates
+has been augmented by the remarkable discoveries
+of Gaudry, Filhol, Milne Edwards,
+Seeley, Schlosser, and others in Europe; of
+Marsh, Cope, Osborn, Leidy, Ameghino, in
+South America; and Forsyth Major in
+Madagascar.<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> These tertiary remains, chiefly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</a></span>
+of Eocene and Miocene date, fill many gaps
+between existing genera of Primates, and
+afford us quite a clear insight into the phyletic
+development of this order during the
+millions of years of the Cænozoic age.</p>
+
+<p>The most important difference between the
+two groups of existing monkeys is indicated
+by their dentition. Adult man possesses,
+like all the other Catarrhine Simiæ, thirty-two
+teeth, whilst the American monkeys (the
+Platyrrhinæ) have thirty-six teeth&mdash;namely,
+one pair of premolars more in the upper and
+lower jaws. Comparative odontology leads
+us to the phylogenetic conclusion that this
+number has been produced by reduction from
+a still older form with forty-four teeth. This
+typical dental formula (three incisors, one
+canine, four premolars, and three molars, in
+each half-jaw) is common to all those most
+important older mammals which in the beginning
+of the Eocene period constituted the four
+large groups of Lemuravida, Condylarthra,
+Esthonychida, and Ictopsida. These are the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</a></span>
+four ancestral groups of the four main orders
+of Placentalia&mdash;namely, of the Primates,
+Ungulata, Rodentia, and Carnassia. They
+seem to be so closely related by their primitive
+organization that they may be united in
+one common super-order, Prochoriata.</p>
+
+<p>With a considerable degree of probability,
+we are led to formulate the further
+hypothesis that all the orders of Placentalia&mdash;from
+the lowest Prochoriata upwards to
+man&mdash;have descended from some unknown
+common ancestor living in the Cretaceous
+period, and that this oldest placental form
+originated from some Jurassic group of
+marsupials.</p>
+
+<p>Among these numerous fossil Lemures
+which have been discovered within the last
+twenty years, there exist, indeed, all the connecting
+forms of the older series of Primates,
+all the 'missing links' sought for by comparative
+odontology.</p>
+
+<p>The oldest Lemures of the tertiary age
+are the Eocene Pachylemures, or Hyopso<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span>dina.
+They possess the complete dentition
+of the Prochoriata&mdash;namely, forty-four teeth
+(3.1.4.3/3.1.4.3). Then follow the Eocene Palæolemures,
+or Adapida, with forty teeth, they
+having lost one pair of incisors in each jaw.
+To these are attached the younger Autolemures,
+or Stenopida, with thirty-six teeth,
+they thus possessing already the same dentition
+as the Platyrrhinæ. The characteristic
+dentition of the Catarrhinæ is derived from
+this formula by the loss of another premolar.</p>
+
+<p>These relations are so clear and so closely
+connected with a gradual transformation of
+the whole skull, and with the progressive
+differentiation of the Primate-form, that we
+are justified in saying that the pedigree of the
+Primates, from the oldest Eocene Lemures
+upwards to man, is now so well known, its
+principal features so firmly fixed within the
+Tertiary age, that there is no missing link
+whatever.</p>
+
+<p>Quite different, and much more incom<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span>plete,
+is the palæontological evidence, if we
+go further back into the Secondary or Mesozoic
+age, and look there for the older ancestors
+of the mammalian series. There we
+meet everywhere with wide gaps, and the
+scarce fragments of fossil Mesozoic mammals
+(excessively rare in the Cretaceous formation)
+are too poor to permit definite conclusions as
+to their systematic position. Indeed, comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny lead us to the
+hypothesis that the oldest Cretaceous Mammalia&mdash;the
+Prochoriata&mdash;are descended from
+Jurassic marsupials, and these again from
+Monotremes. We may also suppose with
+high probability that among the unknown
+Cretaceous Prochoriata there have been
+Lemuravida and forms intermediate between
+these and the Jurassic Amphitheriidæ, and
+that these marsupials in their turn are descendants
+of Pantotheria or similar monotreme-like
+creatures of the Triassic age. Any
+certain evidence for these hypotheses is at
+present still wanting. One important fact,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span>
+however, is established&mdash;namely, that these
+interesting and oldest Mammalia&mdash;the Pantotheria
+of Marsh, the Triassic Dromatheriidæ,
+and the Jurassic Triconodontidæ of Osborn&mdash;were
+small insectivorous mammals with a very
+primitive organization. Probably they were
+Monotremes, and may be derived directly
+from Permian Sauromammalia, an ill-defined
+mixture of Mammalia and Reptilia.</p>
+
+<p>This generalized characteristic supports
+our view that <i>the whole class of Mammalia is
+monophyletic</i>, and that all its members, from
+the oldest Monotremes upwards to man, have
+descended from one common ancestor living
+in the older Triassic, or perhaps in the
+Permian, age. To acquire full conviction of
+this important conception, we have only to
+think of the hair and the glands of our
+human skin, of our diaphragm, the heart and
+the blood corpuscles without a nucleus, our
+skull with its squamoso-mandibular articulation.
+All these singular and striking modifications
+of the vertebrate organization are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span>
+common to mammals, and distinguish them
+clearly from the other Craniota. This characteristic
+combination and correlation proves
+that they have been developed only <i>once</i> in
+the history of the vertebrate stem, and that
+they have been transferred by heredity from
+one common ancestor to all the members of
+the class of Mammalia.</p>
+
+<p>The next step, as we trace our human
+phylogeny to its origin, leads us further back
+into the lower Vertebrata, into that obscure
+Palæozoic age the immeasurable length of
+which (much greater than that of the
+Mesozoic) may, according to one of the
+newest geological calculations, have comprised
+about one thousand millions of years.<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a></p>
+
+<p>The first important fact we have to face
+here is the complete absence of mammalian
+remains. Instead of these we find in the
+later Palæozoic period, the Permian, air-breathing
+<i>reptiles</i> as the earliest representatives
+of Amniota. They belong to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</a></span>
+most primitive order of that class, the
+Tocosauria; and besides them there were
+the Theromorpha, which approach the Mammalia
+in a remarkable manner. These
+reptiles in turn were preceded, in the Carboniferous
+period, by true Amphibia, most
+of them belonging to the armour-clad
+Stegocephali. These interesting Progonamphibia
+were the oldest Tetrapoda, the first
+vertebrates which had adapted themselves
+to the terrestrial mode of life; in them the
+swimming fin of fishes and Dipneusta was
+transformed into the pentadactyle extremities
+characteristic of quadrupeds.</p>
+
+<p>To appreciate the high importance of this
+metamorphosis, we need only compare the
+skeleton of our own human limbs with that
+of the living Amphibia. We find in the
+latter the same characteristic composition
+as in man: the same shoulder and pelvic
+girdle; the same single bone, the humerus
+or the femur, followed by the same pair of
+bones in the forearm and leg; then the same<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</a></span>
+skeletal elements composing the wrist and
+the ankle regions; and, lastly, the same five
+fingers and toes.</p>
+
+<p>The arrangement of these bones, peculiar
+and often complicated, but everywhere
+essentially the same in all the Tetrapoda,
+is a striking evidence that man is a
+descendant from the oldest pentadactyle
+Amphibia of the Carboniferous period. In
+man the pentadactyle type has been better
+preserved by constant heredity than in many
+other Mammalia, notably the Ungulata.</p>
+
+<p>The oldest Carboniferous Amphibia, the
+armour-clad Stegocephali, and especially the
+remarkable Branchiosauri discovered by
+Credner, are now regarded by all competent
+zoologists as the indubitable common ancestral
+group of all Tetrapoda, comprising both
+Amphibia and Amniota. But whence this
+most remote group of Tetrapoda? That
+difficult question is answered by the marvellous
+progress of modern palæontology, and
+the answer is in complete harmony with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</a></span>
+the older results arrived at by comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny. Thirty-four years
+ago Carl Gegenbaur,<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> the great living master
+of comparative anatomy, had demonstrated
+in a series of works how the skeletal
+parts of the various classes of Vertebrata,
+especially the skull and the limbs, still represent
+a continuous scale of phyletic gradations.
+Apart from the Cyclostomes, there are the
+fishes, and among them the Elasmobranchi
+(sharks and rays), which have best preserved
+the original structure in all its essential parts
+of organization. Closely connected with the
+Elasmobranchi are the Crossopterygii, and
+with these the Dipneusta or Dipnoi. Among
+the latter the highest importance attaches
+to the ancient Australian Ceratodus. Its
+organization and development is now, at
+last, becoming well known. This transitional
+group of Dipnoi, 'fishes with lungs'
+but without pentadactyle limbs, is the
+morphological bridge which joins the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</a></span>
+Ganoids and the oldest Amphibia. With
+this chain of successive groups of Vertebrata,
+constructed anatomically, the palæontological
+facts agree most satisfactorily.
+Selachians and Ganoids existed in the
+Silurian times, Dipnoi in the Devonian,
+Amphibia in the Carboniferous, Reptilia in
+the Permian, Mammalia in the Trias. These
+are historical facts of first rank. They
+connote in the most convincing manner that
+remarkable ascending scale in the series of
+vertebrates for our knowledge of which we
+are indebted to the works of Cuvier and
+Blainville, Meckel, Johannes Mueller and
+Gegenbaur, Owen and Huxley. The historical
+succession of the classes and orders
+of the Vertebrata in the course of untold
+millions of years is definitely fixed by the
+concordance of those leading works, and this
+invaluable acquisition is much more important
+for the foundation of our human
+pedigree than would be a complete series of
+all possible skeletons of Primates.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Greater and more frequent difficulties
+arise if we penetrate further into the most
+remote part of the human phylogeny, and
+attempt to derive the vertebrate stem from
+an older stem of invertebrate ancestors.
+None of those had a skeleton which could be
+petrified; and the same remark applies to
+the lowest classes of Vertebrata&mdash;to the
+Cyclostomes and the Acrania. Palæontology,
+therefore, can tell us nothing about them;
+and we are limited to the other two great
+documents of phylogeny&mdash;the results of comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny. The value
+of their evidence is, however, so great that
+every competent zoologist can perceive the
+most important features of the most remote
+portion of our phylogeny.</p>
+
+<p>Here the first place belongs to the invaluable
+results which modern comparative
+ontogeny has gained by the aid of the
+biogenetic law or the theory of recapitulation.
+The foundation-stones of vertebrate embryology
+had been laid by the works of Von<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</a></span>
+Baer, Bischoff,<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> Remak, and Koelliker;<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> but
+the clearest light was thrown upon it by the
+famous discoveries of Kowalevsky<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> in 1866.
+He proved the identity of the first developmental
+stages of Amphioxus and
+the Ascidians, and thereby confirmed the
+divination of Goodsir, who had already
+announced the close affinity of Vertebrates
+and Tunicates. The acknowledgment of
+this affinity has proved of increasing importance,
+and has abolished the erroneous
+hypothesis that the Vertebrata may have
+arisen from Annelids or from other Articulata.
+Meanwhile, from 1860 to 1872, I
+myself had been studying the development
+of the Spongiæ, Medusæ, Siphonophora, and
+other C&oelig;lenterata. Their comparison led
+me to the statements embodied in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</a></span>
+'Gastræatheorie,' the first abstract of which
+was published in 1872 in my monograph of
+the Calcispongiæ.</p>
+
+<p>These ideas were carried on and expanded
+during the subsequent ten years by
+the help of many excellent embryologists&mdash;first
+of all by E. Ray Lankester and Francis
+Balfour. The most fruitful result of these
+widely extended researches was the conclusion
+that the first stages of embryonic
+development are essentially the same in all
+the different Metazoa, and that we may
+derive from these facts certain views on the
+common descent of all from one ancestral
+form. The unicellular egg<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> repeats the stage
+of our Protozoan ancestors; the Blastula is
+equivalent to an ancestral c&oelig;nobium of
+Magosphæra or Volvox; the Gastrula is
+the hereditary repetition of the Gastræa, the
+common ancestor of all the Metazoa.</p>
+
+<p>Man agrees in all these respects with the
+other vertebrates, and must have descended
+with them from the same common root.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Particularly obscure is that part of our
+phylogeny which extends from the Gastræa
+to Amphioxus. The morphological importance
+of this last small creature had been
+perceived by Johannes Mueller, who in 1842
+gave the first accurate description of it. It
+would not, of course, be correct to proclaim
+the modern Amphioxus the common ancestor
+of all the vertebrates; but he must be regarded
+as closely related to them, and as the only
+survivor of the whole class of Acrania. If
+the Amphioxidæ had through some unfortunate
+accident become extinct, we should
+not have been able to gain anything like a
+positive glimpse at our most remote vertebrate
+ancestor. On the one hand, Amphioxus is
+closely connected with the early larva of the
+Cyclostomes, which are the oldest Craniota,
+and the pre-Silurian ancestors of the fishes.
+On the other hand, the ontogeny of Amphioxus
+is in harmony with that of the Ascidians,
+and if this agreement is not merely coincidental,
+but due to relationship, we are
+justified in reconstructing for both Ascidians<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</a></span>
+and Amphioxus one common ancestral group
+of chordate animals, the hypothetical <i>Prochordonia</i>.
+The modern Copelata give us
+a remote idea of their structure. The curious
+Balanoglossus, the only living form of Enteropneusta,
+seems to connect these Prochordonia
+with the Nemertina and other Vermalia,
+which we unite in one large class&mdash;Frontonia.</p>
+
+<p>No doubt these pre-Cambrian Vermalia,
+and the common root of all Metazoa, the
+Gastræades, were connected during the
+Laurentian period by a long chain of intermediate
+forms, and probably among these
+were some older forms of Rotatoria and
+Turbellaria; but at present it is not possible
+to fill this wide gap with hypotheses that
+are satisfactory, and we have to admit that
+here indeed are many missing links in the
+older history of the Invertebrata. Still,
+every zoologist who is convinced of the truth
+of transformism, and is accustomed to phylogenetic
+speculations, knows very well that
+their results are most unequal, often incomplete.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>III.</h2>
+
+
+<p>Let us now recapitulate the ancestral chain
+of man, as it is set forth in the accompanying
+diagram (p. <a name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_55" class="label">55</a>), which represents our present
+knowledge of our descent. For simplicity's
+sake the many side-issues or branches which
+lead to groups not in the main line of our
+descent have been left out, or have been indicated
+merely. Many of the stages are of
+course hypothetical, arrived at by the study
+of comparative anatomy and ontogeny; but
+an example for each of them has been taken
+from those living or fossil creatures which
+seem to be their nearest representatives.</p>
+
+<p>1. The most remote ancestors of all living
+organisms were living beings of the simplest
+imaginable kind, organisms without organs,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</a></span>
+like the still existing <i>Monera</i>. Each consisted
+of a simple granule of protoplasm, a
+structureless mass of albuminous matter or
+plasson, like the recent Chromaceæ and
+Bacteriæ. The morphological value of these
+beings is not yet that of a cell, but that of a
+cytode, or cell without a nucleus. Cytoplasm
+and nucleus were still undifferentiated.</p>
+
+<p>I assume that the first Monera owe their
+existence to spontaneous creation out of so-called
+anorganic combinations, consisting of
+carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. An
+explanation of this hypothesis I have given
+in my 'Generelle Morphologie.'</p>
+
+<p>The Monera probably arose early in the
+Laurentian period. The oldest are the
+Phytomonera, with vegetable metabolism.
+They possessed the power (characteristic of
+plants) of forming albumin by synthesis from
+carbon, water, and ammonia. From some of
+these plasma-forming Monera arose the
+plasmophagous Zoomonera with animal metabolism,
+living directly upon the produce of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</a></span>
+their plasmodomous or plasma-forming
+sisters. This is the first instance of the
+great principle of division of labour.</p>
+
+<p>2. The second stage is that of the <i>simple
+and single cell</i>, a bit of protoplasm with a
+nucleus. Such unicellular organisms are
+still very common. The <i>Am&oelig;bæ</i> are their
+simplest representatives. The morphological
+value of such beings is the same as that of
+the egg of any animal. The naked egg cells
+of the sponges creep about in an am&oelig;boid
+fashion, scarcely distinguishable from Am&oelig;ba.
+The same remark applies to the egg-cell of
+man himself in its early stages before it is
+enclosed in a membrane. The first unicellular
+organisms arose from Monera through differentiation
+of the inner nucleus from the outer
+protoplasm.</p>
+
+<p>3. Repeated division of the unicellular
+organism produces the <i>Synam&oelig;bium</i>, or
+community of Am&oelig;bæ, provided the divisional
+products, or new generations of the
+original cell, do not scatter, but remain<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</a></span>
+together. The existence of such a <i>C&oelig;nobium</i>,
+a number of equal and only loosely-connected
+cells, as a separate stage in the ancestral
+history of animals, is made highly probable by
+the fact that the eggs of all animals undergo
+after fertilization such a process of repeated
+self-division, or 'cleavage,' until the single
+egg cell is transformed into a heap of cells
+closely packed together, not unlike a mulberry
+(<i>morula</i>)&mdash;hence <i>morula</i> stage in ontogeny.</p>
+
+<p>4. The morula of most animals further
+changes into a <i>Blastula</i>, a hollow ball filled
+with fluid, the wall being formed by a single
+layer of cells, the blastoderm or germinal layer.
+This modification is brought about by the
+action of the cells&mdash;they conveying nourishing
+fluid into the interior of the whole cell
+colony and thereby being themselves forced
+towards the surface. The Blastula of most
+Invertebrata, and even that of Amphioxus, is
+possessed of fine ciliæ, or hair-like processes,
+the vibrating motion of which causes the
+whole organism to rotate and advance in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span>
+the water. Living representatives of such
+Blastæads, namely, globular gelatinous
+colonies of cells enclosing a cavity, are
+Volvox and Magosphæra.</p>
+
+<p>5. The Blastula of most animals assumes
+a new larval form called <i>Gastrula</i>, in which
+the essential characteristics are that a portion
+of the blastoderm by invagination converts
+the Blastula into a cup with double walls,
+enclosing a new cavity, the primitive gut.
+This invagination or bulging-in obliterates
+the original inner cavity of the Blastula.
+The outer layer of the Gastrula is the ectoderm,
+the inner the endoderm; both pass
+into each other at the blastoporus, or opening
+of the gut cavity. The Gastrula is a stage
+in the embryonic development of the various
+great groups of animals, and some such
+primitive form as ancestral to all Metazoa is
+thus indicated. This hypothetical <i>Gastræa</i>
+is still very essentially represented by the
+lower C&oelig;lenterates&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Olynthus, Hydra.</p>
+
+<p>6. The sixth stage&mdash;that of the <i>Platodes</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</a></span>
+or flat-worms&mdash;is very hypothetical. They
+are bilateral gastræads, with a flattened
+oblong body, furnished with ciliæ, with a
+primitive nervous system, simple sensory and
+reproductive organs, but still without appendages,
+body cavity, vent, and blood-vessels.
+The nearest living representatives of such
+creatures are the ac&oelig;lous Turbellarians&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>,
+Convoluta, a free-swimming, ciliated creature.</p>
+
+<p>7. The next higher stage is represented
+by such low animals as the <i>Gastrotricha</i>&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>,
+Chætonotus among the Rotatoria, which
+differ from the rhabdoc&oelig;lous Turbellarians
+chiefly by the formation of a vent and the
+beginnings of a c&oelig;lom, or cavity, between
+gut and body wall. The addition of a primitive
+vascular system and a pair of nephridia,
+or excretory organs, is first met with in the
+<i>Nemertines</i>.</p>
+
+<p>8. These, together with the <i>Enteropneusta</i>
+(Balanoglossus), are comprised under the
+name of Frontonia, or Rhynchelminthes,
+and form the highest group of the Vermalia.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>The Enteropneusta especially fix our attention,
+because they alone, although essentially
+'worms,' exhibit certain characteristics which
+make it possible to bridge over the gulf
+which still separates the Invertebrata from
+the vertebrate phylum. The anterior portion
+of the gut is transformed into a breathing
+apparatus&mdash;hence Gegenbaur's term of Enteropneusta,
+or Gut-breathers. Moreover,
+Balanoglossus and Cephalodiscus possess
+another modification of the gut&mdash;namely, a
+peculiar diverticulum, which, in the present
+state of our knowledge, may be looked upon
+as the forerunner of the chorda dorsalis.</p>
+
+<p>9. Stage of <i>Prochordonia</i>, as indicated by
+the larval form, called Chordula, which is
+common to the Tunicata and all the Vertebrata.
+These two groups possess three most
+important features: (<i>a</i>) A chorda dorsalis,
+a stiff rod lying in the long axis of the
+body, dorsally from the gut and below the
+central nervous system. This latter, for the
+first time in the animal kingdom, appears in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</a></span>
+the shape of a spinal cord. (<i>b</i>) The use of
+the anterior portion of the gut for respiratory
+purposes. (<i>c</i>) The larval development of
+the Tunicata is essentially the same as that of
+the Vertebrata in its early stages. Only the
+free-swimming Copelata or Appendicularia
+among the Tunicates retain most of these
+features. The others, which become sessile&mdash;namely,
+the Ascidiæ, or sea-squirts&mdash;degenerate
+and specialize away from the
+main line.</p>
+
+<p class="center">
+<a name="Footnote_55_55" id="Footnote_55_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_55"><span class="label">ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE VERTEBRATA</span></a><br />
+<i>Abridged from 'Systemat. Phylogenie,' § 15.</i><br />
+Names underlined refer to hypothetical groups.</p>
+
+<table id="atv" summary="vertebrata">
+
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Aves</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Mammalia</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Reptilia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Proreptilia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Pisces</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Amphibia</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Stegocephali</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Dipnoi</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Proselachii</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>&nbsp;&nbsp; Cyclostomata</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<i>Tunicata</i> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdc"> <span class="u"><i>Archicrania</i></span></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Acrania</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><span class="u"><i>Prospondylia</i></span></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><span class="u"><i>Prochordonia</i>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>10. Stage of the <i>Acrania</i>, represented by
+Amphioxus. The early development of this
+little marine creature agrees closely with that
+of the Tunicates; but one important feature
+is added to its organization&mdash;namely, metamerism,
+segmentally arranged mesoderm.
+Amphioxus still possesses neither skull nor
+vertebræ, neither ribs nor jaws, and no limbs.
+But it is a member of the Vertebrata if we
+define these as follows: Bilateral symmetrical
+animals with segmentally arranged mesoderm,
+with a chorda dorsalis between the
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</a></span>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</a></span>
+tubular nervous system and the gut, and with
+respiratory organs which arise from the anterior
+portion of the gut. We do not assume
+that Amphioxus stands in the direct ancestral
+line; it is probably much specialized, partly
+degenerated, and represents a side-branch;
+but it is, nevertheless, the only creature,
+hitherto known, which satisfactorily connects
+the Vertebrata with their invertebrate ancestors.
+Many other efforts have been made to
+solve the mystery of the origin of the Vertebrata&mdash;all
+less satisfactory than the present
+suggestion, or even absolutely futile. This
+remark applies especially to the attempts
+to derive them from either Articulata or
+Echinoderms. The other great and highly
+developed phylum, the Mollusca, is quite
+out of the question. We have to go back to
+a level at which all these principal phyla
+meet, and there we find the Vermalia, the
+lower of which alone permit connection in an
+upward direction with the higher phyla.</p>
+
+<p>11. Stage of <i>Cyclostomata</i>. This now<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</a></span>
+small group of Lampreys and Hagfishes
+represents the lowest Craniota; and although
+much specialized as a side-branch of the
+main-stem from which the other Craniota
+have sprung, they give us an idea of what
+the direct ancestors of the latter must have
+been like:&mdash;still without visceral arches,
+without jaws and without paired limbs; with
+a persistent pronephros; the ear with one
+semicircular canal only; mouth suctorial;
+cranium very primitive; and the metamerism
+of the vertebral column indicated only by
+little blocks of cartilage in the perichordal
+sheath. Such creatures must have existed
+at least as early as the Lower Silurian
+epoch; but until 1890 fossil Cyclostomes were
+unknown. Their life in the mud, or as
+endoparasites of fishes, coupled with their
+soft structure, makes them very unfit for
+preservation. This gives all the greater importance
+to Traquair's discovery, in 1890, of
+many little creatures, called by him <i>Palæospondylus
+gunni</i>, in the Old Red Sandstone of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</a></span>
+Caithness, which seem to be very closely
+allied to Cyclostomata.</p>
+
+<p>12. The <i>Elasmobranchi</i> (sharks and skates),
+with their immediate forerunners, the Acanthodi
+of the Devonian and Carboniferous age,
+are the first typical fishes. That they existed
+as far back as the Silurian age is proved by
+many enamelled spines of the dermal armour,
+chiefly from the dorsal fins. This higher
+stage is characterized by the possession of
+typical jaws, by visceral or gill-bearing arches,
+and by two pairs of limbs. None of the
+Elasmobranchs, fossil or recent, stands in the
+direct ancestral line; but they are the lowest
+Gnathostomata, jaw-and-limb-possessing
+creatures, known.</p>
+
+<p>13. Closely connected with the Elasmobranchs
+in a wider sense are the <i>Crossopterygii</i>,
+which begin in the Devonian age as a
+large group, but have left only two survivals,
+the African Polypterus and Calamoichthys.
+They are possessed of dermal bones and
+other ossifications, and are characterized by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</a></span>
+their lobate paired fins, which have a thick
+axis beset with biserial fin rays. Their gill-clefts
+are covered by an operculum, and they
+have a well-developed air-bladder. Whilst
+they are in many respects more highly
+developed than the Elasmobranchs, and are
+intimately connected with the typical Ganoids
+and other bony fishes (all of which form a
+great, manifold side-branch of the general
+vertebrate stem), they stand in many other
+respects (notably, the structure of the paired
+fins, the vertebral column, and the air-bladder)
+nearer the main-stem of our own
+ancestral line.</p>
+
+<p>14. This is shown by their intimate
+relation to the <i>Dipnoi</i>, which are still represented
+by the Australian, African, and South
+American mud-fishes: Ceratodus, Protopterus,
+and Lepidosiren. The genus Ceratodus
+existed in the Upper Trias, whence various
+other unmistakably dipnoous forms lead down
+through the Carboniferous (<i>e.g.</i>, Ctenodus)
+to the Devonian strata&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Dipterus. They<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</a></span>
+are characterized as follows: The paired fins
+still retain the archipterygial form (namely,
+one axis with biserial rays); the heart is
+already trilocular, and receives blood which
+is mixed arterial and venous, owing to the
+gills being retained, while the air-bladder has
+been modified into a lung. In fact, the
+generalized Dipnoi form the actual link between
+fishes and <i>Amphibia</i>.</p>
+
+<p>15. <i>Amphibia.</i> The earliest amphibian
+fossils occur in the Carboniferous strata.
+They alone&mdash;the Stegocephali or Phractamphibia&mdash;stand
+in the ancestral line, while the
+Lissamphibia, to which all the recent forms
+belong, are side-branches. The Stegocephali
+are the earliest Tetrapoda, the archipterygial
+paired fins having been transformed into
+the pentadactyle fore and hind limbs, which
+are so characteristic of all the higher Vertebrata.
+The cranium is roofed over by dermal
+bones, of which, besides others, supra-occipitals,
+supra-orbitals, and supra-temporals
+are always present. The lowest members<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</a></span>
+(Branchiosauri) still retained gills besides
+the lungs, while others (Microsauri) have
+lost the gills. Be it remembered that all the
+recent Amphibia still undergo the same metamorphosis
+during their ontogenetic development.</p>
+
+<p>In the very important Temnospondyli, a
+subgroup of the Stegocephali&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Trimerorhachis
+of the Lower Red Sandstone or Lower
+Permian&mdash;the component cartilaginous or
+bony units which compose the vertebræ still
+remained in a separate, unfused state, showing
+at the same time an arrangement whence
+has arisen that which is typical of the Amniota.
+The same applies to the limbs and
+their girdles. In fact, the Stegocephali, taken
+as a whole, lead imperceptibly to the <i>Proreptilia</i>.</p>
+
+<p>16. <i>Proreptilia</i> are represented by the
+Permian genera Eryops and Cricotus. Until
+quite recently these and many other fossils
+from the Carboniferous strata were looked
+upon as Amphibia, while many undoubted<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</a></span>
+fossil Amphibia were mistaken for reptiles,
+as indicated by the frequent termination
+'-saurus' in their names.</p>
+
+<p>The nearest living representative of these
+extinct Proreptilia is the New Zealand
+reptile Hatteria, or Sphenodon, close relations
+of which are known from the Upper Trias;
+while others&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Palæohatteria&mdash;have been
+discovered in the Permian. Anyhow, Sphenodon
+is the reptile which stands nearest to the
+main stem of our ancestry.</p>
+
+<p>The most important characteristics of the
+Reptilia, which mark a higher stage or level,
+are (1) The entire suppression of the gills&mdash;although
+during the embryonic development
+the gill-clefts still appear in all reptiles, birds,
+and mammals; (2) The development of an
+amnion and an allantois, both for the embryonic
+life only, but so characteristic that all
+these animals are comprised under the name
+of Amniota; (3) The articulation of the skull
+with the first neck vertebræ by well-developed
+condyles, either single (really triple) or<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</a></span>
+double (such a condylar arrangement begins
+with the Amphibia, but only the two lateral
+condyles are developed, while the middle
+portion, belonging to the basi-occipital element,
+remains rudimentary<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a>); (4) The formation
+of centra, or bodies of the vertebræ,
+mainly by a ventral pair of the original quadruple
+constituents, or arcualia.</p>
+
+<p>17. Between the Proreptilia and the Mammalia,
+which latter occur in the Upper Triassic
+epoch, we have necessarily to intercalate a
+group of very low reptiles, which are still so
+generalized that their descendants could
+branch off either into the Reptilia proper or
+into the Mammalia. The changes concerned
+chiefly the brain and the heart; of the skele<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span>ton,
+the skull and the pelvis; and, of the
+tegumentary structures, the formation of a
+hairy covering. Many such creatures existed
+in the Triassic epoch&mdash;namely, the <i>Theromorpha</i>&mdash;some
+of which indeed possess so
+many characteristics which otherwise occur
+in the Mammalia only, that these creatures
+have been termed <i>Sauro-Mammalia</i>. However,
+it has to be emphasized that none of
+the Theromorpha hitherto discovered fulfils
+all the requirements which would entitle them
+to this important linking position. They only
+give us an approximate idea of what this link
+was like.</p>
+
+<p>18. Stage of the <i>Promammalia</i>, or <i>Prototheria</i>.
+The only surviving members are
+the famous duck-bill, Ornithorhynchus, and
+the spiny ant-eaters, Echidna and Proechidna,
+of the Australian region. These few genera,
+however, differ so much from one another in
+various important respects that they cannot
+but be remnants of an originally much larger
+group. Indeed, many fossils from the Upper<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</a></span>
+Triassic and from the Jurassic strata have
+without much doubt to be referred to the
+Prototheria. The Prototheria are typical
+mammals, because they possess the following
+characteristics: The heart is completely
+quadrilocular; the blood is warm, and its red
+corpuscles have, owing to the loss of their
+nucleus, been modified from biconvex into
+biconcave discs; they have a hairy coat and
+sweat glands, and two occipital condyles; the
+ilio-sacral connection is preacetabular; the
+ankle-joint is cruro-tarsal; the quadrate bone
+of the Reptilia has ceased to carry the under
+jaw, which now articulates directly with the
+squamosal portion of the skull. Their low
+position is shown by the retention of the
+following reptilian features: Complete coracoid
+bones and a T-shaped interclavicle; a
+cloaca, or common chamber for the passage
+of the fæces, the genital and the urinary products;
+they are still oviparous; the embryo
+develops without a chorion, and is therefore
+not nourished through a placenta. Even the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</a></span>
+milk glands, which are absolutely peculiar to
+the Mammalia, are still in a very primitive
+stage, and do not yet produce milk proper;
+and there is only a temporary shallow marsupium.</p>
+
+<p>19. Stage of <i>Metatheria</i>, or <i>Marsupialia</i>,
+are direct descendants of Prototheria; but
+they show higher development by the reduction
+of the coracoid bones and the interclavicle.
+The original cloaca is divided into
+a rectal chamber and a uro-genital sinus, completely
+separated, at least in the males; they
+are viviparous; the young are received into
+a permanent marsupium, in the walls of which
+are formed typical milk glands and nipples,
+but the embryo is still devoid of a placenta,
+although some recent marsupials show indications
+of such an organ. The corpus callosum
+in the brain is still very weak.</p>
+
+<p>Most of the marsupials are extinct. They
+occur from the Upper Trias onwards, and
+had in the Jurassic epoch attained a wide
+distribution both in Europe and in America.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</a></span>
+Since the Tertiary epoch they have been
+restricted to America and to the Australian
+region, and are now represented by about 150
+species.</p>
+
+<p>20. Stage of <i>Prochoriata</i>, or early <i>Placentalia</i>:
+a further development of the Metatheria
+by the development of a placenta, loss
+of the marsupium and the marsupial bones,
+complete division by the perineum of the
+anal and uro-genital chambers, stronger
+development of the corpus callosum, or chief
+commissure of the two hemispheres of the
+brain.</p>
+
+<p>Placentalia must have come into existence
+during the Cretaceous epoch. Up to that
+time all the Mammalia seem to have
+belonged to either Prototheria or to Metatheria;
+but in the early Eocene we can
+distinguish the main groups of Placentalia&mdash;namely,
+(1) Trogontia, now represented by
+the rodents; (2) Edentata, or sloths, armadilloes,
+etc.; (3) Carnassia, or Insectivora
+and Carnivora; (4) Chiroptera, or bats;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</a></span>
+(5) Cetomorpha, or whales and dugongs;
+(6) Ungulata; (7) Primates. Of these
+groups, the first and second, third and fourth,
+fifth and sixth, can perhaps, to judge from
+palæontological evidence, be combined into
+three greater groups, as indicated by the
+fossil Esthonychida, Ictopsida, and Condylarthra,
+in addition to the ancestral Primates,
+or Lemuravida, as the fourth large branch of
+the ancestral-tree where this has reached the
+placental level. Among none of the first
+three branches can we look for the ancestors
+of the Primates. The Lemuravida, therefore,
+represent a branch equivalent to the three
+other branches.</p>
+
+<p>21. Stage of <i>Lemures</i>, or <i>Prosimiæ</i>, comprising
+the older members of the Primates,
+consequently approaching most nearly to the
+Lemuravida. The limbs are modified into
+pentadactyle hands and feet of the arboreal
+type, and are protected by nails. The dentition
+is of the frugivorous or omnivorous type,
+with an originally complete series of teeth,</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>with milk teeth and with permanent. The
+orbit is surrounded by a complete bony ring,
+posteriorly by a fronto-jugal arch, but still
+widely communicating with the temporal
+fossa. The placenta is diffuse and non-deciduous.</p>
+<p class= "center">
+ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE MAMMALIA.<br />
+
+<i>'Systematische Phylogenie,' § 386.</i></p>
+
+<table id="atm" summary="mammalia" cellspacing="0">
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Perissodactyla</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc" ></td>
+ <td class="tdc" ><i>Homo</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc" ></td>
+ <td class="tdc" ><small><i>Carnivora</i></small></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"><i><small>Artiodactyla</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">(<i><small>Litopterna</small></i>)</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">&nbsp;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small><i>Pinnipedia</i></small></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Anthropoidae</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Catarhinæ</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small><i>Carnassia</i></small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;,</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Chiroptera</small></i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>(<i>Amblypoda</i>)</small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Proboscidea</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Platyrhinæ</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Insectivora</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">'&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Simiæ</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><small><i>Cetacea</i></small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Sirenia</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Lemures</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Rodentia</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Cetomorpha</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Hyracoidea</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><i><span class="u"><small>Ictopsales</small></span></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">(<i><small>Tillodontia</small></i>)</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><span class="u"><small>Lemuravidæ</small></span></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Trogontia</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Edentata</small></i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><span class="u"><small>Condylarthrales</small></span></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><span class="u"><small>Esthonychales</small></span></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">'&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&mdash;&mdash;|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan="7">Eutheria s. Placentalia</td>
+ </tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan="3"><i><small>Marsupialia diprotodontia</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan="3"><i><small>Marsupialia polyprotodontia</small></i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan="7">Metatheria</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Monotremata</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>(<i>Allotheria</i>)</small></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">Prototheria</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan ="7"><i><span class="u"><small>Hypotheria s. Promammalia</small></span></i></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<p>
+<i>Names in brackets indicate extinct groups.<br />
+Names <span class="u">underlined</span> indicate hypothetical groups or combinations.</i><br />
+</p>
+
+<p>22. Stage of <i>Simiæ</i>. Orbit completely
+separated from the temporal fossa by an
+inward extension of the frontal and malar
+bones meeting the alisphenoid. Placenta consolidated
+into a disc, and with a maternal
+deciduous portion. Mammæ pectoral only.
+The dental formula is 2.1.3.3. All the
+fingers and toes are protected by flat nails.
+The tail is long. The American prehensile-tailed
+monkeys are a lower side-branch.</p>
+
+<p>23. Stage of <i>Catarrhinæ Cercopithecidæ</i>.
+The dental formula is 2.1.2.3, owing to the
+loss of one pair of premolars in each jaw.
+The frontal and alisphenoid bones are in
+contact, separating the parietal from the
+malar bone; this feature is correlated with
+the enlarged brain. The internarial septum<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</a></span>
+is narrow, and the nostrils look forwards and
+downwards instead of sidewards&mdash;hence the
+term 'Catarrhinæ.' The external auditory
+meatus is long and bony. The tail is long,
+with the exception of <i>Macacus inuus</i>. The
+body is covered with a thick coat of furry
+hair. Catarrhine monkeys have existed, we
+know with certainty, since the Miocene.</p>
+
+<p>24. Stage of <i>Catarrhinæ Anthropoidæ</i>, or
+<i>Apes</i>. Now represented by the large apes&mdash;namely,
+the Hylobates or gibbon of South-Eastern
+Asia, <i>Simia satyrus</i>, the orang-utan
+of Sumatra and Borneo, <i>Troglodytes gorilla</i>,
+<i>T. niger</i> and <i>T. calvus</i>, the gorilla and the
+chimpanzees from Western Equatorial Africa.
+Of fossils are to be mentioned Pliopithecus
+and Dryopithecus from European Miocene,
+and <i>Troglodytes sivalensis</i> from the Pliocene
+of the Punjaub. The tail is reduced to a
+few caudal vertebræ, which are transformed
+into a coccyx, not visible externally; but in
+the embryos of apes and man the tail is still
+a conspicuous feature. The walk is semi<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</a></span>erect;
+in adaptation to the prevailing arboreal
+life, the arms are longer than the legs.
+The hair of the body is considerably more
+scanty than in the tailed monkeys. <i>Troglodytes
+calvus</i>, a species or variety of chimpanzee,
+is bald-headed. None of the recent
+genera of apes can lay claim to a place in
+the ancestry of mankind.</p>
+
+<p>25. Stage of <i>Pithecanthropi</i>. Hitherto the
+only known representative is <i>Pithecanthropus
+erectus</i>, from the Upper Pliocene of Java. In
+adaptation to a more erect gait, the legs have
+become stronger and the hind-hand has been
+turned into a flat-soled walking 'foot.' The
+brain is considerably enlarged. Presumably
+it is still devoid of so-called articulate speech;
+this is indicated by the fact that children
+have to learn the language of their parents,
+and by the circumstance that comparative
+philology declares it impossible to reduce the
+chief human languages to anything like one
+common origin.</p>
+
+<p>26. <i>Man.</i> Known with certainty to have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</a></span>
+existed as an implement-using creature in the
+last Glacial epoch. His probable origin
+cannot, therefore, have been later than the
+beginning of the Plistocene. The place of
+origin was probably somewhere in Southern
+Asia.</p>
+
+<p>Whilst we have to admit that there are
+great defects in the older (invertebrate)
+portion of our pedigree, we have all the more
+reason to be satisfied with the positive results
+of our investigation of the more recent (vertebrate)
+part of it. All modern researches have
+confirmed the views of Lamarck, Darwin, and
+Huxley, and they allow of no doubt that the
+nearest vertebrate ancestors of mankind were
+a series of Tertiary Primates.</p>
+
+<p>Particularly valuable are the admirable
+attempts of the two zoologists, Paul and Fritz
+Sarasin,<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> to throw light upon the human
+phylogeny by painstaking comparison of all
+the skeletal parts of man with those of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span>
+anthropoid apes. They have shown that
+among the lower races of man the primitive
+Veddahs of Ceylon approach the apes most
+nearly, and that among the latter the chimpanzee
+stands nearest to man.</p>
+
+<p>The direct descent of man from some
+extinct ape-like form is now beyond doubt,
+and admits of being traced much more clearly
+than the origin of many another mammalian
+order. The pedigrees of the Elephants,
+the Sirenia, the Cetacea, and, above all, of
+the Edentata, for example, are much more
+obscure and difficult to explain. In many
+parts of their organization&mdash;for example, in
+the number and structure of his five digits and
+toes&mdash;man and monkeys have remained much
+more primitive than most of the Ungulata.</p>
+
+<p>The immense significance of this positive
+knowledge of the origin of man from some
+Primate does not require to be enforced. Its
+bearing upon the highest questions of philosophy
+cannot be exaggerated. Among modern
+philosophers no one has perceived this more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</a></span>
+deeply than Herbert Spencer.<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> He is one of
+those older thinkers who before Darwin were
+convinced that the theory of development
+is the only way to solve the 'enigma of the
+world.' Spencer is also the champion of those
+evolutionists who lay the greatest weight
+upon <i>progressive heredity</i>, or the much combated
+<i>heredity of acquired characters</i>. From
+the first he has severely attacked and criticised
+the theories of Weismann, who denies
+this most important factor of phylogeny, and
+would explain the whole of transformism by
+the 'all-sufficiency of selection.' In England
+the theories of Weismann were received with
+enthusiastic acclamation, much more so than
+on the Continent, and they were called 'Neo-Darwinism,'
+in opposition to the older conception
+of Evolution, or 'Neo-Lamarckism.'
+Neither of those expressions is correct.
+Darwin himself was convinced of the fundamental
+importance of progressive heredity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</a></span>
+quite as much as his great predecessor
+Lamarck; as were also Huxley and Spencer.</p>
+
+<p>Three times I had the good fortune to
+visit Darwin at Down, and on each occasion
+we discussed this fundamental question in
+complete harmony. I agree with Spencer
+in the conviction that progressive heredity is
+an indispensable factor in every true monistic
+theory of Evolution, and that it is one of its
+most important elements. If one denies
+with Weismann the heredity of acquired
+characters, then it becomes necessary to have
+recourse to purely mystical qualities of germ-plasm.
+I am of the opinion of Spencer, that
+in that case it would be better to accept a
+mysterious creation of all the various species
+as described in the Mosaic account.</p>
+
+<p>If we look at the results of modern anthropogeny
+from the highest point of view, and
+compare all its empirical arguments, we are
+justified in affirming that <i>the descent of man
+from an extinct Tertiary series of Primates
+is not a vague hypothesis, but an historical fact</i>.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Of course, this fact cannot be proved
+<i>exactly</i>. We cannot explain all the innumerable
+physical and chemical processes,
+all the physiological mutations, which have
+led during untold millions of years from the
+simplest Monera and from the unicellular
+Protista upwards to the chimpanzee and to
+man. But the same consideration applies to
+all historical facts. We all believe that
+Aristotle, Cæsar, and King Alfred did live;
+but it is impossible to give a proof within
+the meaning of modern exact science. We
+believe firmly in the former existence of
+these and other great heroes of thought,
+because we know well the works they have
+left behind them, and we see their effects in
+the history of human culture. These indirect
+arguments do not furnish stronger evidence
+than those of our history as vertebrates.
+We know of many Jurassic mammals only
+a single bone, the under jaw. We all
+believe that these mammals possessed also
+an upper jaw, a skull, and other bones. But<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</a></span>
+the so-called 'exact school,' which regards
+the transformation of species as a hypothesis
+not proven, must suppose that the
+mandibula was the only bone in the body of
+these curious animals.</p>
+
+<p>Looking forward to the twentieth century,
+I am convinced that it will universally accept
+our theory of descent, and that future science
+will regard it as the greatest advance made
+in our time. I have no doubt that the
+influence of the study of anthropogeny upon
+all other branches of science will be fruitful
+and auspicious. The work done in the
+present century by Lamarck and Darwin
+will in all future times be considered one
+of the greatest conquests made by thinking
+man.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</a></span></p>
+
+<p class="center">EVOLUTIONARY STAGES OF THE PRINCIPAL
+GROUPS OF VERTEBRATA.<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> </p>
+<table id="esv" summary="stages">
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>STAGES OF THE</small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small> CLASSES.</small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>STAGES OF THE HEART.</small></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>PAIRED LIMBS.</small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{1. <i>Acrania.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">I. <i>Leptocardia.</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">I. <i>Adactylia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Cold-blooded; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;s. <i>Impinnata</i>.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;with one chamber;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Without jaws</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;without lungs.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;and limbs.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{2. <i>Cyclostomata.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}II. <i>Ichthyocardia.</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;Cold-blooded; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;two-chambered, with</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;one atrium and one</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;ventricle; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;containing venous</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">II. <i>Polydactylia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{3. <i>Pisces.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;blood only; without lungs</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;s. <i>Pinnata</i>.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;With two</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;pairs of fins.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{ 4. <i>Dipnoi.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}III. <i>Amphicardia.</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;}Cold-blooded; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;with three complete</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;chambers, namely, with</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;two atria and one</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{ 5. <i>Amphibia.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">} ventricle, or (Reptilia)</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;two ventricles with still</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;incomplete septum; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;containing mixed venous</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;and arterialized</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">III. <i>Pentadactylia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{ 6. <i>Reptilia.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;blood; with lungs.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;s. <i>Tetrapoda</i>.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;With two</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{IV. <i>Thermocardia.</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;pairs of</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;Warm-blooded; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp; pentadactyle</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;with four complete</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;limbs (unless</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{7. <i>Aves.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;chambers, namely, two</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;they have</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;auricles and two</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;been lost by</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;ventricles; right half</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;reduction).</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;of the heart with venous,</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;left half with arterialized,</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{8. <i>Mammalia.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;blood; with lungs.</td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES</h2>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap"><a name="Footnote_40" id="Footnote_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40">Jean Baptiste de Monet</a>, Chevalier de
+<a name="Footnote_44" id="Footnote_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44">Lamarck</a></span>, was born on August 1, 1744, in
+Picardy, where his father owned land.
+Originally educated for the Church, he
+soon enlisted, and distinguished himself in
+active service. Owing to an accident affecting
+his health, the young Lieutenant gave
+up the military career, and, without means,
+studied medicine and natural sciences at
+Paris. In 1778 appeared his 'Flore française.'
+In 1793 he was appointed to a
+Chair of Zoology at the newly-formed Musée
+d'Histoire Naturelle. He had the misfortune
+to become gradually blind, and the last years
+of his life were spent amid straitened circumstances.
+He died in 1829.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>In 1794 Lamarck divided the whole animal
+kingdom into vertebrate and invertebrate
+animals, and founded successively the groups
+of Crustacea, Arachnida, Annelida, and
+Radiata. Between 1816 and 1822 he published
+his celebrated 'Histoire naturelle des
+Animaux sans Vertèbres.'</p>
+
+<p>His most famous work is the 'Philosophie
+zoologique,' 1809.</p>
+
+<p>Assuming the spontaneous origin of life,
+he propounded the doctrine that all animals
+and plants have arisen from low forms
+through incessant modifications and changes.
+In this respect he was in absolute opposition
+to Cuvier, who upheld the immutability of
+species, and did his best by absolute silence
+to suppress the spread of the new doctrine.</p>
+
+<p>Lamarck has explained his views of transformism
+chiefly in the seventh chapter of the
+first volume of his 'Philosophie zoologique.'</p>
+
+<p>Organisms strive to accommodate or adapt
+themselves to new circumstances, or to satisfy
+new requirements&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, climate, mode of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</a></span>
+procuring food, escape from enemies. The
+continued function of parts of an organism
+changes the old and produces new organs.
+The acquirements are inherited by the offspring,
+and thus are produced the more complicated
+from simpler organisms. Continued
+disuse brings about degeneration and ultimate
+loss of an organ.</p>
+
+<p>Lamarck consequently sees in the adaptability,
+or power of adaptation, which he
+assumes for all living matter the ultimate
+cause of variation; and, as he was certainly
+the first to point out that acquired characters
+are inherited by the progeny, he has given
+a working explanation of Evolution.</p>
+
+<p>But his doctrine did not spread&mdash;partly
+because he was misunderstood. His theory,
+that a new want, by making itself felt, exacts
+from the animal new exertions, perhaps from
+parts hitherto not used, until the want is
+satisfied&mdash;this way of putting it sounds too
+teleological to explain the yearned-for change
+in a mechanical or natural way. Moreover,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</a></span>
+many of his examples lacked the exact basis
+of experiment and observation necessary for
+their acceptance. Witness that of the neck of
+the giraffe,&mdash;a never-failing source of ridicule
+to men who cannot see the deeper purpose
+underlying the well-meant attempt at an explanation,
+which failed from want of complete
+knowledge of the intricate circumstances.</p>
+
+<p>However, the theory of transformism was,
+so to speak, in the air; and various authors
+have written on the subject, filling the gap
+between Lamarck and Darwin, especially
+Goethe, Treviranus, Leopold von Buch,
+and Herbert Spencer. But it is Darwin's
+immortal merit to have opened our eyes by
+his theory of natural selection, which is, at
+least, the first attempt to explain some of the
+causes and incidents of organic Evolution
+in a natural mechanical way. Moreover, he
+was the first clearly to express the fundamental
+principles of the theory of descent, to
+elaborate what had been at best a general
+sketch of an ill-defined problem, and to enter<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</a></span>
+into detail, supported by a host of painstaking
+observations, the making of which had
+taken him half a lifetime. Darwin, without
+going further than cursorily into the causes
+of variation, argued as follows: We know
+that variations do occur in every kind of
+living creatures. Some of these variations
+lead to something, while others do not. An
+enormously greater number of animals and
+plants are born than reach maturity and can
+in their turn continue the race. What is the
+regulating factor? His answer is, The
+struggle for existence&mdash;in other words, the
+weeding out of the less fit, or rather of the
+owners of those variations which are not so
+well adapted to their surroundings.</p>
+
+<p>For 'adapted' we had better read 'adaptable,'
+because a variation which does not
+answer, which cannot be made use of, or,
+still more notably, is a hindrance or disadvantage,
+does not become an adapted
+feature. There is often a confusion between
+adaptation as an accomplished fact, a feature,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</a></span>
+or resultant condition, and adaptation as the
+mode of fitting the organism to, or making
+the best of, the prevailing surroundings or
+circumstances.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire</span> was
+born in 1772 at Étampes, Seine-et-Oise.
+He was originally brought up for the Church;
+but when already ordained he attended
+lectures on natural science and medicine in
+Paris. He managed to get the place of
+assistant in the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle;
+he became Professor of Zoology in 1793, and
+took the opportunity of encouraging young
+Cuvier. Later he became Professor of
+Zoology of the Faculté des Sciences, and in
+1818 he published his remarkable 'Philosophie
+anatomique.' He died in 1844.</p>
+
+<p>He had conceived the 'unity of organic
+composition,' meaning that there is only one
+plan of construction,&mdash;the same principle, but
+varied in its accessory parts. In 1830, when
+Geoffroy proceeded to apply to the Inverte<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</a></span>brata
+his views as to the uniformity of
+animal composition, he found a vigorous
+opponent in Cuvier. Geoffroy, like Goethe,
+held that there is in Nature a law of compensation,
+or balancing of growth, so that if
+one organ take on an excess of development,
+it is at the expense of another part; and he
+maintained that, since Nature takes no
+sudden leaps, even organs which are superfluous
+in any given species, if they have
+played an important part in other species of
+the same family, are retained as rudiments,
+which testify to the permanence of the
+general plan of creation. It was his conviction
+that, owing to the conditions of life,
+the same forms had <i>not</i> been perpetuated
+since the origin of all things, although it was
+not his belief that existing species were becoming
+modified. Cuvier, on the other
+hand, maintained the absolute invariability
+of species, which, he declared, had been
+created with regard to the circumstances in
+which they were placed, each organ con<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</a></span>trived
+with a view to the function it had to
+fulfil,&mdash;thus putting the effect for the cause
+('Encyclopædia Britannica,' 9th edition,
+vol. xxi., p. 171).</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">George <a name="Footnote_46" id="Footnote_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46">Cuvier</a></span>
+in the department of Doubs, which
+at that time belonged to Württemberg. He
+was educated at Stuttgart, and studied
+political economy. While acting as private
+tutor to a French family in France he
+followed his favourite pursuit, the study of
+natural sciences. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire
+heard of him, and appointed him assistant in
+the department of comparative anatomy in the
+Musée d'Histoire Naturelle. In 1799 he was
+elected Professor of Natural History at the
+Collège de France, and soon after he became
+Perpetual Secretary of the Institut National.
+In 1831, a year before his death, Louis
+Philippe raised him to the rank of a peer of
+France.</p>
+
+<p>Cuvier was the first to indicate the true<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</a></span>
+principle upon which the natural classification
+of animals should be based&mdash;namely,
+their structure. It is the study of the
+anatomy of the creatures and their comparison
+which affords the only sound basis
+of a classification. The work which had the
+greatest influence upon the scientific public
+is his 'Règne animal distribué d'après son
+Organisation,' 1817. The system which he
+propounded in this book gradually came to
+have almost world-wide fame, and, in spite
+of its many obvious deficiencies, still lingers
+in some of our most recent text-books.</p>
+
+<p>A standard work is his 'Leçons d'Anatomie
+comparée,' and, in truth, he is the founder
+of that kind of comparative anatomy which
+was brought to such a high state by his
+pupil, the late Sir Richard Owen. Cuvier
+discovered the law of 'correlation of growth,'
+and was the first to apply this law to the
+reconstruction of animals from fragments:
+see his monumental work entitled 'Recherches
+sur les Ossemens fossiles,' 1812.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Cuvier, however, as a strict matter-of-fact
+man, was incapable of appreciating the speculative
+conclusions which were drawn by his
+contemporaries Saint-Hilaire and Lamarck.
+On the contrary, he firmly stuck to the
+doctrine of the immutability of species; and,
+in order to account for the existence of
+animals whose kind exists no longer, he invented
+the famous doctrine of successive
+cataclysms.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Karl Ernst <a name="Footnote_41" id="Footnote_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41">von Baer</a></span>
+was born in 1792
+in Esthonia, studied at Dorpat and then at
+Würzburg, where Döllinger introduced him
+to comparative anatomy. For a few years
+he was a <i>Privat-docent</i> at Berlin; then he
+went to Königsberg as Professor of Zoology
+and Embryology. In 1834 he became an
+Academician at St. Petersburg, where for
+many years he was occupied with the most
+varied studies, chiefly geographical and
+ethnological. The last years of his long,
+active life he spent in contemplative retire<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</a></span>ment
+on his paternal estate, and he died at
+Dorpat in 1876.</p>
+
+<p>While still at Würzburg he induced his
+friend Pander, a young man of means, to study
+the development of the chick; and Pander was
+the first to start the theory of the germinal
+layers from which all the organs arise.
+Baer, however, continued these researches in
+Königsberg, and after nine years' labour produced
+his epoch-making work, 'Ueber Entwicklungsgeschichte
+der Thiere: Beobachtung
+und Reflexion,' Königsberg, 1828. Nine
+years later he completed the second volume.
+He established upon a firm basis the theory
+of the germinal layers, and by further 'reflexions'
+arrived at the elucidation of some of
+the most fundamental laws of biology. For
+example, in the first volume he made the
+following prophetic statement: 'Perhaps all
+animals are alike, and nothing but hollow
+globes at their earliest developmental beginning.
+The farther back we trace their
+development, the more resemblance we find<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</a></span>
+in the most different creatures. And this
+leads to the question whether at the beginning
+of their development all animals are essentially
+alike, and referable to one common ancestral
+form. Considering that the "germ" (which
+at a certain stage appears in the shape of a
+hollow globe or bag) is the undeveloped animal
+itself, we are not without reason for assuming
+that the common fundamental form is that of a
+simple vesicle, from which every animal is
+evolved, not only theoretically, but historically.'</p>
+
+<p>This statement is all the more wonderful
+when we consider that the cells, the all-composing
+individual units, were not discovered
+until ten years later.</p>
+
+<p>In 1829 Baer discovered the human egg,
+and later the chorda dorsalis. In an address
+delivered in 1834, entitled 'The Most Universal
+Law of Nature in all Development,' he
+explained that only from a most superficial
+point of view can the various species be looked
+upon as permanent and immutable types;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</a></span>
+that, on the contrary, they can be nothing
+but passing stages, or series of stages, of
+development, which have been evolved by
+transformation out of common ancestral forms.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Johannes Mueller</span>, born at Coblenz in
+1801, established himself as <i>Privat-docent</i> at
+Bonn, where in 1830 he became Professor of
+Physiology. In 1833 he accepted the Chair
+of Anatomy and Physiology at Berlin, where
+he died in 1858.</p>
+
+<p>He was one of the most distinguished
+physiologists and comparative anatomists.
+By summarizing the labours and discoveries
+already made in the field of physiology, by
+reducing them to order, and abstracting the
+general principles, he became the founder of
+modern physiology. But he was scarcely
+less distinguished by his researches in
+comparative anatomy. His 'Vergleichende
+Anatomie der Myxinoiden,' in <i>Abhandlungen
+der Berliner Akademie</i>, 1835-45, and 'Ueber
+die Grenzen der Ganoiden' (<i>ibid.</i>, 1846), are
+standard works of lasting value.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Mueller exercised a stimulative influence
+as a teacher. Many well-known men&mdash;such
+as Helmholtz, Gegenbaur, Bruecke the physiologist,
+Guenther the zoologist, Virchow the
+pathologist, Koelliker and Haeckel&mdash;have
+been his pupils.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Rudolph <a name="Footnote_45" id="Footnote_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45">Virchow</a></span>
+Schievelbein, a small town in Eastern
+Pomerania. He studied medicine in Berlin
+as a pupil of Johannes Mueller, and went
+in 1849 to Würzburg, where, under the
+influence of Koelliker, and Leydig the pathologist,
+he laid the foundation of an entirely
+new branch of medical science&mdash;that of
+'cellular pathology.' Since 1856 he has
+filled the principal Chair of Pathology at
+Berlin. In 1892 he received the Copley
+medal of the Royal Society.</p>
+
+<p>'His contributions to the study of morbid
+anatomy have thrown light upon the diseases
+of every part of the body; but the broad
+and philosophical view he has taken of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</a></span>
+processes of pathology has done more than
+his most brilliant observations to make the
+science of disease.</p>
+
+<p>'In pathology, strictly so called, his two
+great achievements&mdash;the detection of the
+cellular activity which lies at the bottom of
+all morbid as well as normal physiological
+processes, and the classification of the important
+group of new growths on a natural
+histological basis&mdash;have each of them not
+only made an epoch in medicine, but have
+also been the occasion of fresh extension of
+science by other labourers' (Proc. Royal
+Soc., 1892).</p>
+
+<p>Virchow has not confined himself to
+medicine. He takes the keenest interest in
+anthropology and ethnology, on which subjects
+he has contributed many papers.
+Together with his colleagues Helmholtz the
+physicist, and Du Bois Reymond the physiologist,
+he has taken a leading place in the
+spreading of natural science; but, unfortunately,
+he did not take to the doctrine of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</a></span>
+Evolution, and for the last thirty years has
+been its declared antagonist, rarely missing
+an opportunity of denouncing everything but
+descriptive anatomy and zoology as the
+unsound speculations of dreamers. This has
+on more than one occasion brought him into
+sharp conflict with Haeckel. His activity is
+astonishing, especially if it be remembered that
+Virchow has for many years been one of the
+most conspicuous leaders of the Progressists
+and Radicals in the German Parliament and
+Berlin town-council.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Edward Drinker Cope</span> was born at
+Philadelphia, Pa. After studying at several
+Continental Universities, especially at Heidelberg,
+he became first Professor of Natural
+Science at Haverford College, and later
+Professor of Geology and Mineralogy. He
+died at an early age in 1897. As a member
+of various geological expeditions and other
+surveys, he explored chiefly Kansas, Wyoming,
+and Colorado; and he published many<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</a></span>
+most suggestive papers on the fossil vertebrate
+fauna of North America, and on classification
+especially of Amphibia and Reptiles.</p>
+
+<p>Among works of a more general philosophical
+scope may be mentioned 'The
+Origin of the Fittest,' 1887, and his latest
+work, 'The Primary Factors of Organic
+Evolution,' 1896.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Albert von <a name="Footnote_50" id="Footnote_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50">Koelliker</a></span>
+became Professor of Anatomy at Würzburg.
+His earlier studies and discoveries contributed
+considerably to the systematic development
+of the cell theory. In 1844 he observed the
+division and further multiplication of the
+original egg cell. Next year he showed the
+continuity between nerve cells and nerve
+fibres in the Vertebrata; later, that the non-striped
+or smooth muscular tissue is composed
+of cellular elements. He demonstrated that
+the Gregarinæ are unicellular creatures. In
+1852 he went with his younger friend Gegenbaur
+to Messina, where he studied especially<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</a></span>
+the development of the Cephalopoda (cuttlefishes
+and allies); and he produced a magnificent
+work on Alcyonaria, Medusæ, and
+other allied forms. He elucidated the development
+of the vertebral column, especially
+with reference to the notochord.</p>
+
+<p>In 1848 he founded, together with Th. von
+Siebold, the famous <i>Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche
+Zoologie</i>.</p>
+
+<p>A standard work on mammalian embryology
+is his 'Entwicklungsgeschichte
+des Menschen und der höheren Thiere,' a
+text-book of which the second edition
+appeared in 1879.</p>
+
+<p>At the anniversary meeting of 1897 he
+received the Copley medal, the highest honour
+which the Royal Society can bestow.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Carl <a name="Footnote_49" id="Footnote_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49">Gegenbaur</a>
+</span> was born on August 21,
+1826, in Bavaria. He studied medicine and
+kindred subjects in Würzburg, and as a pupil
+of Johannes Mueller in Berlin.</p>
+
+<p>In 1852 he went with Koelliker to Messina<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</a></span>
+to study the structure and development of the
+marine fauna. Important papers on Siphonophora,
+Echinoderms, Pteropoda, and, later,
+Hydrozoa and Mollusca, were the result.
+Soon after his return he was offered the
+chair of Anatomy at Jena, and at this retired
+spot he produced his most important works,
+devoting himself more and more to the study
+of the Vertebrata. Since 1875 he has held
+the Chair of Anatomy at Heidelberg.</p>
+
+<p>In 1859 he published his 'Principles of
+Comparative Anatomy'; but in 1870 he remodelled
+it completely, the theory of descent
+being the guiding principle. These 'Grundzüge'
+were followed by a somewhat more
+condensed 'Grundriss,' the second edition of
+which was published in 1878, and has been
+translated into French and English. In the
+meantime he had broken new ground by
+the development and treatment of certain
+problems concerning the composition and
+origin of the limbs, the shoulder-girdle and
+the skull, researches which are embodied<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</a></span>
+in his 'Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden
+Anatomie der Wirbelthiere,' 1864-65-72.</p>
+
+<p>In 1883 he brought out a text-book on
+human anatomy. This also marked a new
+epoch, because for the first time, not only the
+nomenclature, but also the general treatment
+of human anatomy, was put upon a firm
+comparative anatomical basis. The success
+of this work is indicated by the fact that it
+reached the sixth edition in 1897.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, in 1898, appeared the first volume
+of what may be called his crowning work,
+'Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere.'</p>
+
+<p>Gegenbaur is universally recognised, not
+only as the greatest living comparative
+anatomist, but also as the founder of the
+modern side of this science, by having based
+it on the theory of descent.</p>
+
+<p>In 1896 he received from the Royal Society
+the Copley medal 'for his pre-eminence in
+the science of comparative anatomy or animal
+morphology.'</p>
+
+<p>His marvellously powerful influence as a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</a></span>
+teacher and investigator has made Heidelberg
+a centre whence many pupils have
+spread his teaching, and above all his method
+of research.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Ernst Heinrich Haeckel</span> was born on
+February 16, 1834, at Potsdam. He carried
+out his academical studies alternately at
+Berlin and Würzburg, attracted by such
+men as Johannes Mueller, Koelliker, and
+Virchow. For years he was undecided what
+his career should be, whether that of botanist,
+collector, or geographical traveller. Certainly
+that of medicine attracted him least, although
+in deference to his father's wishes he qualified
+and settled down for a year's practice in
+Berlin. As he himself has told us, he might
+perhaps have proved rather successful as a
+physician, to judge from the fact that he did
+not lose a single patient. But 'I had only
+three patients all told, and the reason of this
+is perhaps that I had given on my plate the
+hours of consultation as from 5 to 6 <i>a.m.</i>'</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>During the year 1859 he travelled as
+medical man and artist in Sicily. In 1861
+he was induced by Gegenbaur, whose acquaintance
+he had made in Würzburg, to
+establish himself as a <i>Privat-docent</i> for comparative
+anatomy in Jena. And there he
+has remained ever since, filling the Chair of
+Zoology, and having declined several much
+more tempting offers from the Universities of
+Würzburg, Vienna, Strassburg, and Bonn.</p>
+
+<p>Within one year, 1865, he wrote the two
+volumes of his 'Generelle Morphologie der
+Organismen,' as he himself relates, in order
+to master his sorrow over the loss of his first
+wife. But he broke down, and went to the
+Canaries to recruit health and strength. The
+'Morphologie,' which has long been out of
+print,<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> made scarcely any impression. It<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</a></span>
+was ignored, probably because he had placed
+the old-fashioned study of zoology and morphology
+upon a thoroughly Darwinistic basis.</p>
+
+<p>On the advice of his friend Gegenbaur, he
+gave a more popularly written abstract of
+his 'Generelle Morphologie'&mdash;in fact, the
+substance of a series of his lectures&mdash;in
+the shape of his 'Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte.'
+This 'History of Natural
+Creation,' which in 1898 has reached the
+ninth edition (first edition translated into
+English in 1873), had the desired effect.
+So also had his '<a name="Footnote_42" id="Footnote_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42">Anthropogenie</a> oder
+<a name="Footnote_47" id="Footnote_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47">Entwicklungsgeschichte</a> des <a name="Footnote_51" id="Footnote_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51">Menschen</a>,' the
+fourth edition of which appeared in 1891.</p>
+
+<p>It was a lucky coincidence that Haeckel
+had just finished his preliminary academical
+studies, was entirely at leisure, and undetermined
+to which branch of natural science
+he should devote his genius, when Darwin's
+great work was given to the world. Haeckel
+embraced the new doctrine fervently, and,
+as Huxley was doing in England, he spread<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</a></span>
+it and fought for it with ever-increasing
+vigour in Germany.</p>
+
+<p>With marvellous vigour and quickness of
+perception he applied the principles of Evolution
+or the theory of descent to the whole
+organic world, and not only opened entirely
+new vistas for the study of morphology,
+but also worked them out and fixed them.
+He was the first to draw up pedigrees of
+the various larger groups of animals and
+plants, filling the gaps by fossils or with
+hypothetical forms (the necessary existence
+of which he arrived at by logical deductions);
+and thus he reconstructed the first universal
+pedigree, a gigantic ancestral tree, from the
+simple unicellular Am&oelig;ba to Man. Of course
+these pedigrees were entirely provisional, as
+he himself has over and over again avowed;
+but they are, nevertheless, the ideal which all
+systematists and morphologists working upon
+the basis of Evolution have since been seeking
+to establish.</p>
+
+<p>Naturally he was vigorously attacked, not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</a></span>
+only by anti-Darwinians, or rather anti-Evolutionists,
+but also by many of those
+who, having accepted the principle of transformism,
+ought to have known better.
+Perhaps they thought they did know better.
+Imperfections or mistakes in details of the
+grand attempt,&mdash;and these, naturally, were
+many,&mdash;were singled out as samples of the
+whole, which was ridiculed as the romance
+of a dreamer.</p>
+
+<p>In the end, however, this hostility, narrow-minded
+and unfair in many respects, has done
+good to the cause. There has arisen an
+ever-increasing school of workers in favour
+of the new doctrine. Owing to renewed
+research, criticism, corrections in all directions,
+we now know considerably more about
+natural classification (and this is pedigree)
+than when Haeckel first opened out the
+whole problem.</p>
+
+<p>Owing to his fearless mode of exposition,
+regardless of the indignant wrath which the
+new doctrine aroused in certain ecclesiastical<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</a></span>
+quarters, Haeckel bore the brunt of almost
+endless attacks, and had to write polemical
+essays. The result has been that friend and
+foe alike are now working on the lines which
+he has laid down; most of the ideas which
+he was the first to conceive, and to formulate
+by inventing a scientific terminology for
+them, have become important branches, or
+even disciplines, of the science.</p>
+
+<p>Most morphologists of the younger generations
+now take these terms for granted, without
+remembering the name of their founder.
+It is, therefore, perhaps not quite superfluous
+to mention some of them:</p>
+
+<p><i>Phylum</i>, or stem, the sum total of all those
+organisms which have probably descended
+from one common lower form. He distinguished
+eight such phyla&mdash;Protozoa,
+C&oelig;lenterata, Helminthes or Vermes, Tunicata,
+Mollusca, Articulata, and Vertebrata.
+The phyla are more or less analogous to
+'super-classes,' large branches or 'circles,' or
+principal groups of other zoologists.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_43" id="Footnote_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43"><i>Phylogeny</i></a>,
+the history of the <a name="Footnote_48" id="Footnote_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48">development</a> of the various <a name="Footnote_52" id="Footnote_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52">phyla</a>, classes, orders,
+families,and species.</p>
+
+<p><i>Ontogeny</i>, the history or study of the
+development of the individual, generally
+called embryology. In reality the scope of
+embryology is the ontogenetic study of the
+various species, and this branch of developmental
+study alone can be checked by direct,
+'exact' observation, for the simple reason
+that the individuals alone are entities, while
+the species, genera, families, etc., are abstract
+ideas.</p>
+
+<p>The <i>ontogenesis of any given living organism
+is a short, condensed recapitulation of its
+ancestral history or of its phylogenesis</i>. This
+is Haeckel's 'fundamental biogenetic law.'</p>
+
+<p>A complete proof of the phylogeny of any
+creature would be given by the preservation
+of an unbroken series of all its fossil ancestors.
+Such a series will in most cases, for obvious
+reasons, always remain a desideratum. In a
+few cases, however, the desideratum is nearly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</a></span>
+met: for example, the ancestral line of the
+one-toed digitigrade horse from a four-or
+five-toed plantigrade and still very generalized
+Ungulate is approaching completion.</p>
+
+<p>Phylogenetic study has to rely upon other
+help. This is afforded by comparative
+anatomy and by the study of ontogeny.
+If the latter were a faithful, unbroken recapitulation
+of all the stages through which
+the ancestors have passed, the whole matter
+would be very simple; but we know for
+certain that in the individual development
+many stages are left out (or, rather, are
+hurried through, and are so condensed by
+short-cuts being taken that we cannot
+observe them), while other features which
+have been introduced obscure, and occasionally
+modify beyond recognition, the original
+course.</p>
+
+<p>Again, the sequence of the appearance
+of the various organs is frequently upset
+(<i>heterochronism</i>). Some organs are accelerated
+in their development, while others,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</a></span>
+which we know to be phylogenetically older,
+are retarded in making their reappearance in
+the embryo.</p>
+
+<p>These disturbing or distorting newly introduced
+features or factors show themselves
+chiefly in connection with the embryonic conditions
+of growth&mdash;for example, yolk-sac,
+placenta, amnion. They all come within the
+category of <i>cænogenesis</i>: they are cænogenetic,
+while the true, undisturbed recapitulation is
+<i>palingenetic</i>.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, some features, so-called rudimentary
+or vestigial organs, instead of disappearing,
+are most tenacious in their recurrence, while
+others of originally fundamental importance
+scarcely leave recognisable traces, and are, so
+to speak, only hinted at during the embryonic
+growth of the creature we happen to study.
+Hence arises the philosophical study of
+'Dysteleology.'</p>
+
+<p>Among other terms invented by Haeckel,
+and now in general use, are <i>Metamere</i>,
+<i>Metamerism</i>, <i>C&oelig;lom</i>, <i>Gonochorism</i>, <i>Gastrula</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</a></span>
+<i>Metazoa</i>, <i>Gnathostomata</i>, <i>Acrania</i>, <i>Craniota</i>,
+and <i>Amniota</i>.</p>
+
+<p>Hitherto we have dealt with his general
+work only, a résumé of which he gave for
+many years in a course of thirty lectures
+before an audience composed of 'all sorts
+and conditions of men.' Students of biology
+and of medicine side by side with theologians,
+incipient and ordained, jurists, political economists,
+and philosophers, crowded his lecture-room
+during the 'seventies to hear the master
+explaining the 'natural history of creation' or
+the mysteries of anthropogenesis. Another
+course of eighty lectures during the winter
+semester was, and still is, devoted to a
+systematic treatment of zoology, while practical
+classes are reserved for the more select.</p>
+
+<p>His winning personality and fascinating
+eloquence, combined with a clear and concise
+delivery, have gained the enthusiastic admiration
+of many a student who went to the quiet
+University town in order to learn with his
+own ears and eyes.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><i>List of Separate Publications by Professor
+Haeckel.</i></p>
+
+<p>'Biologische Studien. I.: Studien ueber
+die Moneren und andere Protisten.' Leipzig,
+1870 (out of print). He was the first to
+make observations on the natural history of
+the Monera, living bits of protoplasm, devoid
+even of a nucleus&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, <i>Protogenes primordialis</i>,
+<i>Protomyxa aurantiaca</i>.</p>
+
+<p>'Monographie der Radiolarien.' Berlin,
+1862-88. With 171 plates.</p>
+
+<p>'Entwicklungsgeschichte der Siphonophoren.'
+Utrecht, 1869.</p>
+
+<p>'Plankton-Studien. Vergleichende Untersuchungen
+ueber die Bedeutung und
+Zusammensetzung der pelagischen Fauna
+und Flora.' Jena, 1880.</p>
+
+<p>'Metagenesis und Hypogenesis von
+Aurelia aurita.' Jena, 1881.</p>
+
+<p>'Monographie der Geryoniden oder
+Ruesselquallen.' Leipzig, 1865.</p>
+
+<p>'Generelle Morphologie der Organismen.'
+2 vols. Berlin, 1866.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>'Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte
+des Menschen,' 1874; 4th edition,
+1891.</p>
+
+<p>'Natuerliche Schoepfungs-Geschichte.' 2
+vols. Berlin, 1st edition, 1868; 9th edition,
+1898. This work has been translated into
+most European languages (the first edition in
+English, under the title 'Natural History of
+Creation' in 1873; the eighth in 1892).</p>
+
+<p>'Monographie der Kalkschwaemme.' 3
+vols. Berlin, 1872 (out of print). With the
+subtitle, 'An Attempt to solve analytically
+the Problem of the Origin of Species.' In
+this work, illustrated by sixty plates, he
+showed that the Calcispongia are individually
+so yielding, so adaptive to external influences,
+that it is practically impossible to break up
+the whole group into anything like satisfactory
+species or genera. According to
+predilection, we can distinguish either 1 genus
+with only 3 species, or 3, 21, 43 genera, with
+21, 111, 181, or 289 species respectively.</p>
+
+<p>In this work, in 1872, Haeckel established<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[Pg 112]</a></span>
+the homology of the two primary layers, ecto-
+and endoderm, throughout the Metazoa.
+The attempt to do the same for the four
+secondary layers, as made in the second part
+of his 'Gastræa-theory,' failed. It caused
+an enormous amount of research, hitherto
+without a satisfactory solution of the problem.</p>
+
+<p>'Studien zur Gastræa-Theorie.' Jena,
+1874. The transformation of the single
+primitive egg-cell by cleavage into a globular
+mass of cells (Morula)&mdash;which latter, becoming
+hollow (and then known as the Blastula),
+turns ultimately by invagination or by delamination
+into the Gastrula&mdash;is a series of
+processes which applies to all Metazoa. The
+Gastrula is, therefore, the ancestral form of
+the Metazoa; and the Gastræa-theory,
+founded by Haeckel, throws light, on the one
+hand, upon the mystery of the phyletic connection
+of the various animal groups, while,
+on the other hand, it connects the Metazoa,
+or multicellular organisms, with the lowest
+Protozoa. We come to this conclusion because<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</a></span>
+the Gastrula arises from and passes
+through stages which exist as independent,
+permanent organisms among the Protozoa.</p>
+
+<p>Needless to say this Gastræa-theory has
+been violently attacked in detail, with the
+result that various modifications of the Gastrula,
+until then undreamed of, have become
+known.</p>
+
+<p>'Monographie der Medusen.' Jena, 1879-81.
+With 72 coloured plates.</p>
+
+<p>'Reports on the Scientific Results of the
+Voyage of H.M.S. <i>Challenger</i>.' With 230
+plates:</p>
+
+<blockquote>
+<p>1. Deep-sea Medusæ. 1881.<br />
+2. Radiolaria. 1887.<br />
+3. Siphonophoræ. 1888.<br />
+4. Deep-sea Keratosa. 1889.<br />
+</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>A short holiday spent on the coasts of the
+Red Sea produced the volume 'Arabische
+Korallen' (Berlin, 1876); and a longer trip
+to Ceylon has been described in 'Indische
+Reisebriefe,' of which the third edition<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</a></span>
+appeared in 1893. The English translation
+(1883) is entitled 'A Visit to Ceylon.'</p>
+
+<p>'Monism as connecting Religion and
+Science: the Confession of Faith of a Man
+of Science.' 1894.</p>
+
+<p>Haeckels latest work is the 'Systematische
+Phylogenie' (Berlin, 1896), three volumes
+dealing with Protistæ and Plants, Invertebrata
+and Vertebrata. They contain the author's
+views on the natural system of the organic
+world, both living and extinct. Notable in
+the work are the many reconstructions of
+ancestral forms which, provided Evolution is
+true, must have existed&mdash;hypothetical until
+they, or something like them, are found in a
+fossil state. Everybody who works systematically,
+and upon the basis of Evolution,
+does, sometimes unconsciously, reconstruct
+such links, although he may perhaps not see
+the necessity, or have the courage to fix
+his vision, by assigning to it all those attributes
+or characters which are indicated by
+deductions from comparative anatomy, palæontology,
+and embryology.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>THEORY OF CELLS.</h2>
+
+
+<p>The vegetable cell was discovered by
+<i>Schleiden</i>, Professor of Botany at Jena, in
+1838. Next year <i>Schwann</i> found the animal
+cell.</p>
+
+<p>In 1844 <i>Koelliker</i> discovered that the egg
+cell, by division and multiplication, becomes
+an aggregation&mdash;a heap of new cells.</p>
+
+<p>In 1849 <i>Huxley</i> found the two primary
+layers (observed long before by <i>Pander</i> and
+<i>Baer</i> in the chick) also in certain Invertebrata,
+the Medusæ; and he called these layers
+'ectoderm' and 'endoderm' respectively.</p>
+
+<p>In 1851 <i>Remak</i>, in his 'Untersuchungen
+über die Entwicklung der Thiere,' showed
+the egg to be a simple cell, and that from it,
+by repeated division or multiplication, arise<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</a></span>
+the germinal layers, and that by differentiation
+of the cells of these layers are formed
+all the tissues of the body.</p>
+
+<p><i>Kowalevsky</i>, of St. Petersburg, found the
+two primary germinal layers also in Worms,
+Echinoderms, Articulata, and other animals.</p>
+
+<p><i>Haeckel</i>, in 1872, found the same in the
+Sponges. He stated that these two germinal
+layers occur in all animals, except in the
+Protozoa; and that they are homologous,
+or equivalent, in all the groups of animals,
+from the Sponges up to Man. In 1873, in
+his 'Gastræa-theorie,' he explained the
+phylogenetic significance, and tried to show
+the homology, of the four secondary germinal
+layers.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>FACTORS OF EVOLUTION.</h2>
+
+
+<p>An organism, as living matter, does not
+stand in opposition to, or outside of, the rest
+of the world. It is part of the world. It
+receives matter from its surroundings, and
+gives some back; therefore it is influenced
+by its surroundings. It is acted upon, and
+it reacts upon the latter, and if these change
+(and they are nowhere and never strictly the
+same) the organism also <i>varies</i>. It <i>adapts</i>
+itself, and if it does not, or, rather, cannot,
+do so, it dies, because it is unfit to live in the
+world, or, rather, in those particular surroundings
+and conditions in which it happens to be.
+That organism which yields most easily, accommodates
+itself most quickly, has the best
+chance of existence&mdash;<i>survival of the fittest</i>.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</a></span>
+'Fitness' in this case does not mean fitness
+to live, but rather a particular condition which
+happens to fit into the new circumstances.</p>
+
+<p>Adaptation and variation are simultaneous:
+they are fundamentally the same. If there
+were no adaptability and no variability,
+those simplest of organisms which we suppose
+to have sprung into existence in the
+pre-Cambrian period would long ago have
+ceased to exist.</p>
+
+<p>It is the physiological momentum which
+models the organism, and, by causing its
+adaptations, has produced its organs by
+change of function. Gegenbaur illustrates
+this most important fundamental truth by
+an excellent example. Suppose that, in an
+absolutely simple organism, all the parts of
+its exterior are under the same functional
+conditions, so that each part of the surface
+can take in food, and that this is digested,
+assimilated, in the interior. There is, in
+this condition, not yet any definite organ.
+If this organism sinks to the bottom and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</a></span>
+becomes sessile, this part is excluded from
+taking in nourishing matter, while the
+opposite surface alone remains, or becomes
+more, fit for this function. Thus, a simple
+variation and adaptation has been produced,
+and if the same organism continues in this
+position, its bottom cells will estrange themselves
+from their original function, while
+those on the top will convey the food into
+the interior, where a cavity will be formed,
+ultimately with a permanent opening, the
+primitive gut and mouth, both very different
+from the 'foot.'</p>
+
+<p>Thus, by adaptation and variation the
+organism acquires new functions, organs,
+features, and it gives up and eventually loses
+others. Its offspring is like it. Like produces
+like. This is the principle of <i>heredity</i>.
+Adaptation, when going on generation after
+generation on the same lines in the same
+direction, becomes continuous, and has an
+intensifying, <i>cumulative</i> effect. By always
+weeding out from a flock of pigeons those birds<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</a></span>
+which possess more dark feathers than the
+rest, we ultimately produce an entirely white
+race. We hurry on what Nature does slowly.</p>
+
+<p>The inheritance of acquired characters
+becomes very obvious in the following
+example: The Monera are the lowest living
+organisms known; they consist of a mass of
+protoplasm, and are still devoid of even a
+nucleus. They multiply simply by division;
+each half is like the other, and like the parent
+(which by this process has ceased to exist),
+except that each is smaller and has to grow.
+A certain Moneron, <i>Protomyxa aurantiaca</i>,
+is orange-coloured, and its offspring is from
+the beginning of the same colour, and this
+colour has been acquired by that kind of
+Monera-like protoplasm which thereby has
+become the species called Aurantiaca. We
+have no reason for assuming that there
+existed from the beginning of life not only
+colourless, but also red, orange, and other
+kinds of protoplasm. In these simplest of
+organisms the whole process of heredity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</a></span>
+seems very obvious; but in the higher ones,
+in those which propagate by eggs, the
+problem is infinitely more complicated. It
+is true that the egg is, strictly, nothing but a
+small part of the parental organism, and we
+know from everyday experience that this
+single egg-cell has in it all the attributes and
+characteristics of the parent; but these attributes
+and characteristics make their appearance
+successively, just as the egg cell of a
+chick has neither wings nor feathers, not
+even a backbone, but develops these organs
+because its parents have them.</p>
+
+<p>The theory that acquired characters are
+hereditary has often been vigorously attacked;
+but the champions of the negative position
+have not given us anything satisfactory
+instead. They question, also, the principle
+of adaptation as a factor in Evolution, and
+substitute 'variation,' coupled with 'natural
+selection.'</p>
+
+<p>They point to Darwin's argument: (1) It
+is a fact that animals and plants produce a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</a></span>
+much greater number of young than in their
+turn grow up to propagate the race; (2) no
+two of the frequently many individuals of
+the same breed are exactly alike, although
+the differences may be hidden to our perception
+(this is quite true, because no two
+entities can live in absolutely the same place
+and conditions); (3) through heredity the
+offspring takes over the faculties and features
+of the parents; (4) what decides which of
+the many individuals (each one possessing
+some aberration or variation) are to live and
+to propagate the race?&mdash;obviously those
+individual variations which happen to make
+the lucky possessors most fit for the struggle
+for life.</p>
+
+<p>So far, well; but the 'Neo-Darwinians'
+imagine that 'adaptation' is not the cause, but
+the result, the effect, of the formation of
+species. According to them, the species are
+neither adapted by, nor do they adapt themselves
+to, their surroundings. Adaptation is to
+them an accomplished fact, a condition which a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[Pg 123]</a></span>
+species happens to be in because its particular
+variation is the one which, to the exclusion
+of others, suits or fits into its surroundings.
+Such a view simply takes variation for
+granted, and stipulates it as a something
+<i>a priori</i>, without raising the further necessary
+question, why there should be any
+variations at all. Why, indeed, unless they
+are caused by external influences? Haeckel
+elucidated this by the conception of adaptation
+as explained in the foregoing pages.</p>
+
+<p>These and kindred speculations have produced
+some rather curious discussions, which
+not infrequently end in conundrums. If we
+speak of a case of adaptation as a condition, a
+fact, we easily run the risk of getting into confusion
+about cause and effect. For example: Is
+the stag swift because he has long and slender
+legs, or are his legs long because he is swift?
+In reality, swiftness and length of legs are
+cause and effect in one. His legs have been
+so modified as to make him swift, because he
+has put them continuously to whatever was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</a></span>
+his full speed, which in his thick-footed
+ancestors was probably a very slow one.
+The above question reads, therefore, more
+sensibly as follows: Has the stag become
+swift because his legs have become long and
+slender, or have his legs become long and
+slender because he has attained swiftness?
+Now, we see that both halves of the double
+question are practically the same and instantly
+suggest the answer.</p>
+
+<p>A fundamental difference between artificial
+machines and living organisms is that the
+former are worn out by use, while the latter
+not only repair the loss caused by use, but are
+also stimulated to further increase. On the
+other hand, organs which are not put into
+function, or are not used, <i>degenerate</i>. The
+various cells of the organ react upon external
+stimuli by increased activity. Why this should
+be so is another question&mdash;perhaps because
+those which do not would soon be not fit to
+survive. Each cell has a function; the more
+specialized the more intense it is. Every<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[Pg 125]</a></span>
+external stimulus, every contact with the
+outer surroundings, is an insult, necessarily
+of detrimental effect, as it disturbs the equilibrium
+of the cell body. It must, therefore,
+be of advantage to the cells' well-being to
+return as soon as possible to the <i>status quo
+ante</i>, and this can only be done by increased
+activity.</p>
+
+<p>In the present state of our knowledge,
+we can approach only the simplest cases of
+acquisition of characteristics. Mostly they
+are so complicated, subject to so many unthought-of
+conditions, that we do not know
+from which end to approach the problem.
+Frequently the supposed use of certain
+obvious features is the merest guesswork.
+This applies especially to features to which
+we are not accustomed (although wrongly
+so) to assign a function&mdash;for example, coloration.
+A green tree-frog will with predilection
+rest on green leaves. The advantages
+of concealment are obvious, and in this case
+he 'adapts himself' to the surroundings by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</a></span>
+making for green localities: if he did not
+he would be eaten up sooner than his more
+circumspect comrades. But this making for,
+and sitting in, the green has not <i>necessarily</i>
+made him of that colour. Extreme advocates
+of one view would argue as follows:
+Once upon a time there were among the
+offspring of ancestral tree-frogs some which,
+among other colours, exhibited green, not
+much, perhaps not even perceptible to our
+eyes. The occurrence of this colour, according
+to them, was spontaneous, a freak&mdash;as if
+in reality there were anything spontaneous
+in the sense of being causeless. The
+descendants of these more greenish creatures,
+provided they did not pair with frogs of the
+ordinary set, became still greener (by accumulative
+inheritance), and so on, until the green
+was pronounced sufficient to be of advantage
+when competition could set in.</p>
+
+<p>With this view there is always the difficulty
+of understanding how the initial very
+small changes can be useful, unless we have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</a></span>
+to deal with extremely simple organisms. Is
+it likely in the case of our frogs that an
+almost imperceptible variation in colour makes
+them more fit to live? We have to assume
+that 'luck' or chance kept them for generations
+out of harm's reach, until the accumulation
+of green, hitherto quite ineffective,
+neither harmful nor useful, became strong
+enough to be effective. Such cases undoubtedly
+happen.</p>
+
+<p>But we can also argue out this problem
+in a somewhat different way, which goes
+nearer to the root of the whole process. The
+original slight, imperceptible change in pigmentation
+is not a spontaneous freak; it was
+caused by the direct influence of the surroundings
+in which the particular frogs
+happened to live, be this factor light or
+temperature or food. Thus it stands to
+reason that the offspring, living under similar
+conditions, will be acted upon in the same
+way. That factor which has added green to
+the parents will add green to the children,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</a></span>
+until by accumulative inheritance a more
+decidedly green race is produced.</p>
+
+<p>The offspring of green plants do not
+become green when grown in the dark; the
+young plants inherit not the green, but the
+capacity of becoming green when acted upon
+by sunlight. This as an instance of direct
+influence of the surroundings on a substance
+(chlorophyll), which has not yet performed a
+function. But the kittens of a pair of black
+cats produce black hair before they are born,
+and we have no reason to doubt that the
+black pigment in their tegumentary structures
+is ultimately referable to the action of the
+sunlight. In many instances creatures living
+for generations in darkness become white,
+pigmentless, and they regain it when exposed
+to light. For example, the white, colourless
+Proteus from the caves of Adelsberg becomes
+clouded grey, and ultimately jet black, when
+kept in a tank whence light is not strictly
+excluded.</p>
+
+<p>Blindness is a very general characteristic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[Pg 129]</a></span>
+of creatures which dwell in darkness. There
+are all stages between total blindness and
+weak eyes. Now, do these blind creatures
+live in darkness because they are blind, or
+have they become first weak-eyed and then
+blind because of the continuous disuse of
+their eyes? The former explanation has
+actually been suggested! Individuals not
+smitten, but spontaneously, as a freak, born
+with sore eyes, have crept into the darkness
+for relief and have produced a blind race!
+To carry such a notion to the bitter end leads
+to absurdities. Anyhow, it is not understandable
+where the benefit of losing the
+eyesight arises. It can be explained only
+by continued disuse: witness <i>Spalax typhlus</i>,
+the blind mole, and, above all, the Endoparasites.</p>
+
+<p>Let us now take an example to explain the
+influence of a tangible external stimulus.
+Repeated pressure produces callosities.
+Although they are not exactly beneficial
+in the shape of corns on our toes, they are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[Pg 130]</a></span>
+so on our hands. At any rate, the morphologist
+can trace the development of the
+footpads, nails, hoofs, and horns, step by
+step from small beginnings. The cells of
+the Malpighian stratum, of the inner, active
+portion of our epidermis, are excited to extra
+activity, and by continually producing more
+horn cells than peel off the surface of the
+skin in the normal process of wear and tear
+cause the formation of the pad. It need
+scarcely be mentioned that hypertrophic
+growths are not necessarily useful; they are
+often harmful, and in that case pathological.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, a few words about the very difficult
+question of <i>teleology</i>. In trying to explain
+Evolution in a mechanical&mdash;sometimes called
+monistic, but in reality natural&mdash;way, we
+exclude anything like a set purpose, a goal,
+or ideal, a final condition which the organism
+strives to attain. Unknown, however, to
+many morphologists, especially embryologists,
+their writings are full of this teleological
+notion. Indeed, there are many cases<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</a></span>
+in which an organism becomes changed, and
+quickly, too, in a way which cannot but be
+called reasonable. It starts modifications, be
+they outgrowths, alterations in shape or colour,
+or the making good of injuries received,
+which by 'short-cuts' produce the only
+advantageous result that can reasonably
+satisfy the new requirement or altered circumstances.</p>
+
+<p>Trees growing in precarious positions,
+after part of the supporting rock has slipped
+away, throw out new roots, and rearrange some
+of the old ones in the only way which could
+save the tree. In animals which have lost part
+of a limb the wound closes up, and what is left
+is turned into a serviceable stump&mdash;for
+example, in water-tortoises (creatures in which
+reproduction of lost limbs does not happen).
+In frogs and newts the lost part is reproduced,
+not correctly, but in a good semblance.
+Tortoises which have had their shell smashed
+can throw off an astonishingly large portion
+and renew the bone as well as the over<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</a></span>lapping
+scutes; but this mending is not neatly
+done. It serves the requirement, but it is
+patchwork; the new shell is such as no
+tortoise ever possessed before.</p>
+
+<p>Mammals transported into colder countries,
+or subjected to continued exposure, grow a
+thicker coat; and the same kind of tree
+which in a sheltered valley is tall, large-leaved,
+and soft-wooded, assumes a very
+different aspect, although perhaps growing
+into a healthy specimen, when planted on a
+wind-exposed hill.</p>
+
+<p>There is no room, or, rather, no time, to
+apply to these cases the principle of many
+variations or the long-continued accumulation
+of infinitely small changes. The thing is to
+be done quickly, or not at all. Nor can we
+explain the mending of a wound, which
+implies an activity of countless cells, simply
+as a case of, or similar to, the reproduction
+of a lost part; against such an
+explanation militates the almost absolute
+unlikelihood of that precise injury having<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[Pg 133]</a></span>
+happened before to any of the creature's
+ancestors.</p>
+
+<p>Still, I think we are brought near the solution
+of the mystery by such considerations.
+We see no difficulty in the regeneration of a
+few cells, or in the making good of the disturbance
+suffered by one of the most simple
+organisms; but we become suspicious when
+we see that countless cells, not of one kind,
+but of the most varied tissues and parts of
+the body, make common cause in remedying
+a defect in a serviceable way.</p>
+
+<p>We must assume that since the beginning
+of life organisms have been subjected to
+countless insults. We can scarcely speak of
+a wound in an Amæba; but these insults
+have always been made good, and whenever
+this was not the case, that particular organism
+came to an end. As these organisms developed
+into more complicated ones, the
+possible insults became more serious, more
+complicated; and the organisms took adaptive
+measures so as to be superior to them. This<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</a></span>
+action, I have no hesitation in declaring,
+became by heredity a habit. The whole
+creature became so thoroughly 'imbued' (for
+want of a better word) with the finding of
+ways and means for meeting sudden, serious
+conditions, that it now acts directly, and
+produces by a short-cut, with the least amount
+of time and with the smallest possible waste
+of material, that which meets the occasion,
+thereby saving the life of the individual and
+that of the race. This we cannot but call
+reasonable and to the purpose, although it is
+all carried out by <i>causæ efficientes</i> without
+there being any <i>causæ finales</i>.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION.</h2>
+
+
+<p>One million years is a stretch of time beyond
+our conception. We can arrive at a more or
+less adequate understanding of what a million
+individuals or concrete things means. Several
+Continental nations can put more than a
+million men into the field. We can gaze at
+a building which contains as many bricks;
+and we know that our own body is composed
+of millions of millions of cells. No
+such help applies to time, because that itself
+is an entirely relative, abstract conception.
+We can imagine what one hundred years are
+like&mdash;a span of time seemingly short to the
+hale and hearty octogenarian, enormous to
+the child, totally inapplicable to certain<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</a></span>
+animals whose whole life is crowded into one
+single day.</p>
+
+<p>Astronomers have long ceased to reckon
+distances by miles or any other understandable
+unit. They express the distances
+between us and the stars and nebulæ by
+'years of light.' Try to imagine a unit of
+length equal to that which is passed through
+by light (186,000 miles per second) in one
+year. Not so very long ago the enormous
+distances resulting from astronomical calculations
+were looked upon as the most serious
+objection to the correctness of the astronomers'
+views as to the distances which separate our
+globe from the nearest fixed stars. We have
+not yet accustomed ourselves to reckoning
+time by some similar broadly-conceived
+standard&mdash;say æons of so many thousand
+years each.</p>
+
+<p>Unfortunately, we possess no data whatever
+for calculating the age of the successive
+geological strata. Thanks to Lyell, the
+theory of violent universal cataclysms has<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</a></span>
+been done away with. It is more probable
+that the same agencies have acted which are
+now changing the aspect of the globe; and
+these changes are slow, as far as we know
+them&mdash;at least, as far as the formation of
+sedimentary strata is concerned, and these
+alone we have to deal with. Various calculations
+have been made, based upon the
+denudation of the mountains, the filling up of
+the valleys by the débris, the formation of
+deltas, etc. The results give enormous
+stretches of time, but all of them unsatisfactory,
+because the methods are so very local in
+their application.</p>
+
+<p>The least objectionable attempt is that
+which, based upon astronomical calculations,
+tried to fix the height of the last Glacial
+epoch<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> at about 200,000 years ago, and
+asserted that since its beginning in the
+Pliocene epoch as many as 270,000 years
+have elapsed. The duration of the whole<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</a></span>
+Tertiary period has by the same authorities
+been fixed approximately at 3,000,000 to
+4,000,000 years. Beyond this we cannot venture
+without the wildest speculation; but we
+know to a certain extent the thickness of the
+various sedimentary strata, which amount in
+all to from 100,000 to 175,000 feet&mdash;on the
+average perhaps 130,000 feet, or about twenty
+miles.</p>
+
+<p>Unless we prefer giving up all attempt
+at calculation as absolutely hopeless, and
+thus resign the whole problem, we must at
+least try to arrive at some results, and then
+see if these cannot reasonably be made use of.</p>
+
+<p>Neither geologist nor physicist, and no
+zoologist, would accept the suggestion that
+these 130,000 feet of stratified rocks have
+been deposited within only as many years,
+although the average rate of deposit would
+in that case be not more than 1 foot per
+year. On the other hand, an indignant protest
+is raised against the assumption of
+1,000,000,000 years.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Lord Kelvin<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> has come to the conclusion
+(from data which various other authorities
+regard as very unsatisfactory) that not
+much more than 100,000,000 years can have
+elapsed since the molten globe acquired a
+consolidated crust. Further time must have
+passed before the surface had become stable
+and cool enough to allow the temperature of
+the collecting oceans to fall below boiling-point,
+and it is obvious that life cannot
+possibly have begun until after this had
+happened.</p>
+
+<p>Wallace, in his 'Island Life,' by making
+use of Professor A. Geikie's results as to the
+rate of denudation of matter by rivers from
+the area of their basins, and estimating the
+average rate of deposition, concludes that
+'the time required to produce this thickness
+of rock [Professor Haughton's maximum of
+177,000 feet] at the present rate of denudation
+and deposition is only 28,000,000 years.'<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</a></span>
+Our lower assumption of 130,000 feet thickness
+would give only 20,000,000 years&mdash;a
+rate of 1 foot in 154 years.</p>
+
+<p>Again, if we prefer round numbers to start
+with, we have only to assume that the age of
+the whole Tertiary period, with its 3,000 feet
+thickness, is 3,000,000 years (<i>i.e.</i>, 1,000 feet
+in 1,000,000 years, or 1 foot in 1,000 years,
+surely an excessively slow rate); then
+130,000,000 years would bring us to the
+bottom of the Laurentian or pre-Cambrian
+deposits. Of course, it is a pure assumption
+that the same rate of destruction and sedimentation
+applies to the whole of the strata;
+but we know nothing to the contrary, especially
+if we consider the average periods, the
+quick periods of extra activity, taken with the
+slow periods or those of standstill.</p>
+
+<p>Dana estimated the length of the whole
+Tertiary period at one-fifteenth of the Mesozoic
+and Palæozoic combined. If we take
+the duration of the Tertiary period, as before,
+as 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 years, the total<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</a></span>
+will amount to from 45,000,000 to 60,000,000
+years.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, Walcott<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> has estimated the duration
+of the Palæozoic, Mesozoic, and Cænozoic
+or Tertiary epochs at about 17,000,000,
+7,000,000 and 3,000,000 years respectively,
+giving 27,700,000 years from the beginning
+of the Cambrian; and Williams<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> has calculated
+the relative duration of the smaller
+epochs. See the table on p. 149.</p>
+
+<p>The results of all these calculations fall
+surprisingly well within the limits of Lord
+Kelvin's allowance. Of course they are
+based upon assumptions, but none of them
+is inherently unreasonable; and it was my
+purpose to draw attention to the surprising
+coincidence in the closeness of these results,
+perhaps too good to be true. Such calculations
+are considered close enough if they
+range within a few multiples of each other.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</a></span></p>
+<p>Zoologists have fallen into the habit of
+requiring enormous lengths of time for the
+evolution of the animal kingdom. We know
+that Evolution is at best a slow process, and
+the conception of the changes necessary to
+evolve man from monkey-like creatures, these
+from the lowest imaginary mammals, these
+from some reptilian stock, thence descending
+to Dipnoan fish-like creatures, and so on
+back into Invertebrata, down to the simple
+Monera&mdash;this conception is indeed gigantic.
+Innumerable, almost endless, slow changes
+require seemingly unlimited time, and as time
+is endless, why not draw upon it <i>ad libitum</i>?</p>
+
+<p>Huxley pointed out that it took nearly the
+whole of the Tertiary epoch to produce the
+horse out of the four-toed Eohippos, and
+that, if we apply this rate to the rest of
+its pedigree, enormous times would be required.
+This is, however, a very misleading
+statement, which necessitates considerable
+reduction, in conformity with our increased
+palæontological knowledge. Animals of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[Pg 143]</a></span>
+genus Equus&mdash;namely, Ungulata, with one
+toe, and with a certain tooth pattern&mdash;from
+the Upper Miocene of India are now known.
+Moreover, it is not simply a question of the
+gradual loss of the side-toes. The change
+from the fox-sized little Eohippos and Hyracotherium,
+so far as skull, teeth, vertebral
+column, and limbs are concerned (about the
+soft parts we know next to nothing), is a
+very great one indeed.</p>
+
+<p>Elephants and mammoths seem to have
+developed very rapidly. None are known
+from Eocene strata; but towards the end
+of the Miocene they had spread over Asia,
+Europe, and North America, and that in
+great numbers. The Eocene Amblypoda
+are still so different that we hesitate to connect
+them ancestrally with the elephants.</p>
+
+<p>The Pinnipedia (seals and walruses) are
+strongly modified fissiped Carnivora, and have
+existed since at least the Upper Miocene;
+the transformation must have been accomplished
+within the Miocene period.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">[Pg 144]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that
+various groups have from the time of their
+first appearance burst out into an exuberant
+growth of modifications in form, size, and
+numbers, into all possible&mdash;and one might
+almost say impossible&mdash;shapes; and they
+have done this within comparatively short
+periods, after which they have died out not
+less rapidly. It seems almost as if these go-ahead
+creatures had, by accepting every
+possible modification and carrying the same
+to the extreme, too quickly exhausted their
+plasticity&mdash;which, after all, must have limits&mdash;thereby
+becoming unable to meet successfully
+the requirements of further changes in their
+surroundings. The slowly developing groups,
+keeping within main lines of Evolution, and
+not being tempted into aberrant side-issues,
+had, after all, a much better chance of onward
+evolution.</p>
+
+<p>A good example of the former are the
+Dinosaurs. We do not know their ancestors;
+but we have here to deal only with their<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">[Pg 145]</a></span>
+range of transformation. The oldest known
+forms occur in the Upper Trias; they attain
+their most stupendous development in the
+Upper Jurassic and in the Wealden; and
+they have died out with the Cretaceous epoch.
+But already some of their earliest forms had
+assumed bipedal gait, and the Oolitic Compsognathus
+had developed almost bird-like hind-limbs.</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, there are many
+instances of extremely slow development&mdash;facts
+which raise the difficult question of
+'persistent types.' Are these due to a state of
+perfection which cannot be improved upon?
+Or are they due to a kind of morphological
+consolidation (not necessarily specialization)
+which can no longer yield easily, so that therefore
+through changes in their surroundings
+they may come to an end sooner than more
+plastic groups?</p>
+
+<p>Struthio, the ostrich; Orycteropus, the
+Cape ant-eater; Tapirus, and many others,
+existed in the Miocene age practically as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">[Pg 146]</a></span>
+they are now; but pre-Pliocene dolphins,
+cats, monkeys, stags, all belong to closely-allied
+and well-defined 'genera,' but different
+from the living forms.</p>
+
+<p>Alligators and crocodiles are known from
+the Upper Chalk; Tomistoma since the
+Miocene; Gavialis since the Pliocene.</p>
+
+<p>The oldest surviving reptile is Sphenodon,
+the Hatteria of New Zealand, a fair representative
+of what generalized reptiles of the
+later Triassic period seem to have been like;
+and to the same period belongs Ceratodus,
+the Australian mud-fish, hitherto the oldest
+known surviving genus of a very ancient and
+low type so far as Vertebrata are concerned.</p>
+
+<p>Now let us see if the above estimates of
+geological time are so utterly inapplicable to
+animal evolution. On purpose we take one
+of the lowest estimates, about 28,000,000
+years, and apportion them equally to the
+various strata or epochs.</p>
+
+<p>The original owner of the famous Trinil
+skull, a <i>Pithecanthropus erectus</i>, lived,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">[Pg 147]</a></span>
+according to some, in the Late Pliocene,
+according to others in the Early Plistocene,
+period&mdash;that is to say, somewhere about
+the beginning of our last Glacial epoch,
+some 270,000 years ago. Assuming that
+he and his like reached puberty at sixteen
+to twenty years of age, about 17,000 generations
+would lie between him and ourselves,
+or, to put it more forcibly, between
+him and the lowest living human races&mdash;say
+the Ceylonese Veddahs. Only 250 generations,
+at twenty years, carry us back to
+3000 <span class="smcap">B.C.</span> (<i>i.e.</i>, beyond the ken of history); and
+if it be objected that the differences between
+the oldest inhabitants of Egypt, the Naquada,
+and the present Fellahin are very slight,
+we are welcome to multiply these differences
+sixty or seventy fold, in order to arrive at the
+Pithecanthropus level. But these Naquada
+had no metal implements, and there cannot be
+the slightest doubt that the development of
+the human race went on by leaps and bounds
+after certain discoveries had been made&mdash;to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">[Pg 148]</a></span>
+wit, the use of implements and that of fire.
+That creature which first took up a stone or
+a branch and wielded it thereby got such an
+enormous advantage over his fellow-creatures
+that his mental and bodily development went
+on apace. The same applies to the improvement
+of speech. We assume the single,
+monophyletic origin of mankind at one place,
+in one district; and the differences between
+some of the races of man are great enough
+to constitute what we might call species.
+Compare the Venus of Milo, that noble expression
+of the ancient Greeks' notion of
+female beauty, with the 'products of art' of
+the Veddahs or the dwarfs of Central Africa,
+or think of the beau-idéal which a Michael
+Angelo could possibly have evolved if he had
+never seen any but such people.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">[Pg 149]</a></span></p>
+
+<div style="line-height:90%">
+<table id="tae" summary="time" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" rules="cols" frame="box">
+<tr style="border:1px solid black;">
+ <td class="tdc">I.</td>
+ <td class="tdc">II.</td>
+ <td class="tdc" >III.</td>
+ <td class="tdc" >IV.</td>
+ <td class="tdc" >V.</td>
+ <td class="tdc" >VII.</td>
+ <td class="tdc">VII.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Recent</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Adam and Eve</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr">250</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Plistocene</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;5</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Man, contemp-</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr">3,500</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}&nbsp; 270,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;orary with Reindeer</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; in France</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Pliocene -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >} 3,000,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Pithecanthropus</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >16</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >} 600,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; erectus</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Miocene -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}10</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Anthropoid</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >10</td>
+ <td class="tdr">60,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >} 2,100,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; Apes</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Eocene -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Lemurs</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">420,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Cretaceous -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;10</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;3,600,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Jurassic -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;5</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1,800,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Rhætic -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Prototheria, or</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;&nbsp;1,800,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;first Mammalia</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >} 7,200,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Keuper -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">} 5</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}1,800,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Muschelkalk -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">New Red</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Theomorpha</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">425,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Sandstone </td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Magnesian</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Limestone</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Lower Red</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Proreptilia</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">250,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Sandstone</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}15</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}4,000,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Coal-measures</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Eotetrapoda</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">500,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Mountain</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Limestone</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}17,500,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Devonian -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;15</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >4,000,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Dipnoi and</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">1,000,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; Crossopterygii</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Silurian -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;10</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >2,700,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >First fishlike</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">900,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; creatures</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Ordovician -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;10</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >2,700,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Cambrian -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;15</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;4,000,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Sum total of</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Laurentian -</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; generations</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Archean or</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; (about)</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr">5,375,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Metamorphic</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+</div>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">[Pg 150]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Explanation of the Table on p. 149.</span></p>
+
+<blockquote>
+
+<p>Column I. contains the names of the successive sedimentary
+strata.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;"&nbsp; &nbsp;II. contains the percentage of the duration of the
+various epochs, according to <i>Williams</i>, the
+time from the Cambrian until recent times
+being taken as 100.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;"&nbsp; &nbsp; III. gives the estimated duration in years of the
+Palæozoic, Mesozoic, and Cænozoic periods,
+according to <i>Walcott</i>.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;"&nbsp;&nbsp;IV. gives in years the duration of the various
+smaller epochs, as computed from Walcott and
+Williams' statements.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;" &nbsp; &nbsp;V. Representatives of stages of the ancestral line of
+man. The names stand in the level of the
+stratum in which they have made their first
+appearance.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;" &nbsp; &nbsp;VI. contains the number of years which, in the present
+calculation, have been assumed necessary for
+the animal to reach puberty.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;"&nbsp; &nbsp;VII. contains the number of generations which can
+have elapsed from stage to stage. For example,
+60,000 generations separate the earliest known
+anthropoid apes from Pithecanthropus.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>Let us follow the descent of man further
+back. The next stage, reckoning backwards,
+is that from Pithecanthropus to <i>bonâ-fide</i>
+anthropoid apes. They are represented in
+the Miocene by various genera&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Pliopithecus
+and Dryopithecus. According to
+Croll and Wallace, 850,000 years ago carry us<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">[Pg 151]</a></span>
+into the Miocene epoch. Assuming that
+these apes lived about 600,000 years before
+Pithecanthropus, namely, in the later half of
+the Miocene, and taking puberty at ten years
+of age, a high estimate, we get not less than
+60,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>2. From Apes back to lowest Lemurs in
+the lowest Eocene. The date of Eocene
+being fixed at 3,000,000, we have about
+2,100,000 years for this stage; assuming as
+much as five years for puberty, this results in
+420,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>3. From Lemures to Prototheria. The
+earliest known mammalian remains come
+from the Rhætic, or top formation of the
+Triassic epoch; allowing for the Rhætic
+only 100,000 years, we have to add the
+whole of the Jurassic and Cretaceous, in all
+about 5,500,000 years. Assuming three
+years for a generation, we get 1,800,000
+generations.</p>
+
+<p>4. From Prototheria to something like the
+Theromorpha at the bottom of the Triassic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">[Pg 152]</a></span>
+strata. A duration of 1,700,000 years divided
+by four gives 425,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>5. From Theromorpha to Proreptilia,
+represented by Eryops and Cricotus from
+the Lower Permian of Texas. Allowing
+1,000,000 years, each generation at four
+years, we obtain 250,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>6. From Proreptilia to Eotetrapoda, the
+first terrestrial Vertebrata, represented by
+something like the Stegocephali, the earliest
+of which are known from the Coal-measures.
+Assuming them to have come into existence
+at the bottom of the Coal-measures, for the
+duration of which we may guess 2,000,000
+years, we get, with four years' allowance for
+puberty, 500,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>7. From Eotetrapoda to a not yet separated
+or differentiated group of Crossopterygian
+and Dipnoan fishes, both of which
+are known from Devonian strata. The
+duration of the latter has been computed at
+4,000,000 years, which, with 1,000,000 for
+the Mountain Limestone formation, gives us<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">[Pg 153]</a></span>
+5,000,000 for this stage. Assuming, for the
+sake of round numbers, as much as five
+years for a generation, we get 1,000,000
+generations.</p>
+
+<p>8. Earliest stage, down to the first fish-like
+creatures. Teeth and spines indicating the
+existence of fishes are known from the Upper
+Silurian. By carrying the earliest fishes down
+to the bottom of the Silurian, with 2,700,000
+years' duration, and allowing three years for
+attaining puberty, the calculation results in
+900,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>Further back we cannot go. We do not
+know of any Vertebrate remains from the
+Ordovician and Cambrian, which together
+represent 6,700,000 years, enough for at least
+half as many generations of Prochordate
+creatures. The pre-Cambrian or Laurentian
+epoch lies quite beyond the reach of calculation,
+nor have we any trustworthy fossil
+remains of living matter from these strata, to
+which, however, Haeckel and others refer the
+first beginnings of life.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">[Pg 154]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>All the above calculations are, of course,
+only approximate. What we do know is
+the existence of representatives of the stages,
+our proofs being the fossils; but when we refer
+the origin of the Eotetrapoda, for example, to
+the bottom and not somewhere to the middle
+of the Coal-measures, we are guessing
+merely. Alterations in the levels assumed
+for the various stage-representatives will, of
+course, alter the result of the number of
+generations; but the leading idea, as a
+whole, is not thereby upset. The fact
+remains that in the Upper Silurian we have
+fishes; from the Coal-measures onwards, fishes
+and Amphibia; since the Permian, fishes,
+Amphibia, and reptiles; since the end of the
+Trias these three classes and the Mammalia;
+and lastly, at least since the Plistocene, man
+himself. If Evolution is true at all, the
+transformation from early fish-like creatures
+to man has come about within these epochs.
+Being able to assign a time of duration to
+each of them, with an approximate total of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">[Pg 155]</a></span>
+21,000,000 years, we are also able to put
+the whole ancestral series to a test by expressing
+each great stage in generations. The
+result is very satisfactory. The whole enormous
+stretch from the lowest fish-like creatures
+to man has been resolved into more
+than 5,000,000 successive generations, and
+each of these means a little step forwards in
+onward Evolution.</p>
+
+<p>Nothing is to be gained for the understanding
+of our problem of Evolution if we
+multiply this enormous number of generations
+by ten or any other multiple. We
+are not able to conceive changes so small
+as those which necessarily have existed
+between Pithecanthropus and man if the
+whole striking difference is analysed into
+17,000 steps. Every one of these stages in
+the modifications of the muscles, the skeletal
+framework, increase of brain, shortening of
+the trunk, lengthening of the legs, improvement
+of the hands, loss of the hairy coat, etc.,
+is truly microscopical, imperceptible, just as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">[Pg 156]</a></span>
+the Evolutionist imagines the whole process
+to have been. Again, where is the difficulty
+implied by the change from an air-breathing,
+in many structural points half-amphibian, fish
+into a primitive land-crawling four-footed
+creature, if we are allowed to resolve the
+transformation into 1,000,000 stages? So far
+from there being any difficulty, rather does it
+appear questionable if so many infinitely small
+changes have been necessary to bring about
+this result.</p>
+
+<p>One thousand years make apparently no
+difference in the evolution of animals, nor
+does one second change the aspect of the
+hands on the face of a clock, nor did Julius
+Cæsar's commission of scientific men appreciate
+the error of about eleven minutes in
+the length of the year beyond its real value;
+but now the Russians are, owing to this
+neglect, nearly two weeks behind the civilized
+nations.</p>
+
+
+<p class="center">THE END.<br />
+
+<small>BILLING AND SONS, PRINTERS, GUILDFORD.</small></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</a></span></p>
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<p class="center">By PROFESSOR ERNST HAECKEL</p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>MONISM</big>;<br />
+<small>OR</small>,<br />
+The Confession of Faith of a Man of Science.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> Translated from the German by J. D. F. GILCHRIST.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 1s. 6d. net.</i>
+</p>
+
+<p>'We may readily admit that Professor Haeckel has stated his case
+with the clearness and courage which we should expect of him, and
+that his lecture may be regarded as a fair and authoritative statement
+of the views now held by a large number of scientifically educated
+people.'&mdash;<i>Times.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The Monism, which is the substance of his faith, is thus defined by
+him: "Our conviction that there lives one spirit in all things, and that
+the whole cognizable world is constituted, and has been developed, in
+accordance with one common fundamental law." As the confession of
+a distinguished man of science, this little work deserves to be read.'&mdash;<i>North
+British Daily Mail.</i></p>
+
+<p>'This "Confession of Faith" was delivered by the great German
+scientist, its author, as an extemporaneous address at Altenburg rather
+more than two years ago. There are, no doubt, a large number of
+English readers who will welcome a translation, for this "connecting of
+religion and science" has long troubled many earnest students of
+modern science.'&mdash;<i>Publisher's Circular.</i></p>
+
+<p>'This is a little book of great daring, an example of the wild speculative
+flights of one of the very ablest and greatest of our contemporary
+men of science.'&mdash;<i>Aberdeen Free Press.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The address, whatever we may think of its conclusions, is, however,
+most interesting reading, and is admirably done into English by the
+translator.'&mdash;<i>Literary World.</i></p>
+
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</a></span></p>
+<hr class="tb"/>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>Demy 8vo., price 7s. 6d. net.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>SOURCES OF THE APOSTOLIC CANONS.</big></p>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>With a Treatise on the Origin of the Readership and other Lower Orders.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By Professor ADOLF HARNACK.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> Translated by LEONARD A. WHEATLEY.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>With an Introductory Essay on the Organization of the Early Church
+ and the Evolution of the Reader.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By the Rev. <span class="smcap">John Owen</span>, Author of 'Evenings with the Skeptics.'
+</p>
+
+<p>'Dr. Adolf Harnack is at the present time undoubtedly the leading liberal
+authority in Germany on matters connected with early Christian history.'&mdash;<i>The
+Times.</i></p>
+
+<p>'Those who are interested in early Church history know how to prize anything
+from the pen of Prof. Harnack. They will not be disappointed with the present
+paper, in which, with his accustomed learning and acute criticism, he annotates
+and comments upon the fragments of primitive church law which partly form the
+basis of the Apostolic Canons.'&mdash;<i>British Weekly.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The wide circulation of this volume would be of the happiest augury for a
+more scientific and worthy conception of the organization of the primitive
+Church.'&mdash;Dr. <span class="smcap">Marcus Dods</span> in <i>The Bookman</i>.</p>
+
+
+<hr class="tb"/>
+<p class="center"> <i>Crown 8vo., cloth, price 1s. 6d. net.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>CHRISTIANITY AND HISTORY.</big></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By ADOLF HARNACK.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> Translated, with the Author's sanction, by THOMAS BAILEY
+ SAUNDERS, with an Introductory Note.
+</p>
+
+<p>'It is highly interesting and full of thought. The short introductory note with
+which Mr. Saunders prefaces it is valuable for its information and excellent in its
+tone.'&mdash;<i>Athenæum.</i></p>
+
+<p>'A singularly able exposition and defence of Christianity, as seen in the newer
+light, by one of the most learned and acute "evangelical" critics of Germany.
+The essay is a masterly one.'&mdash;<i>Glasgow Herald.</i></p>
+
+<p>' ... We hope the lecture will be widely read.'&mdash;<i>Primitive Methodist
+Quarterly Review.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The lecture itself is weighty in its every word, and should be read and re-read
+by those desiring to have in a nutshell the central positions of modern Christianity.'&mdash;<i>Christian
+World.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">[Pg 159]</a></span></p>
+<hr class="tb"/>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>Third Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth, price 5s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH.</big></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By J. WELLHAUSEN,<br />
+<small>PROFESSOR AT MARBURG.</small>
+</p>
+
+<p>'This work is now issued for the third time as an independent
+treatise. It admirably epitomizes the subject, and exhibits on almost
+every page evidences of Professor Wellhausen's profound study.'&mdash;<i>Publishers'
+Circular.</i></p>
+
+<p>'We would only say that those who differ from his critical views
+will yet do well to study them, and to read this history in which
+he applies them. Its separate publication, in a handy form and at
+a moderate price, makes it generally accessible.'&mdash;<i>North British
+Daily Mail.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The publication in a separate form of Professor Wellhausen's
+article in the "Encyclopædia Britannica" on "Israel" will be very
+warmly welcomed by many readers.'&mdash;<i>Manchester Guardian.</i></p>
+
+<p>'We are very glad to welcome an edition of Professor Wellhausen's
+"Sketch of the History of Israel and Judah" in a convenient
+and handy form. This is the first time it has appeared in
+a separate form. It is already known to students; it ought now
+to become popular. It is based on the learned author's studies in
+Hebrew literature and history, and, though not controversial in form,
+it differs totally from orthodox presentations of the subject.'&mdash;<i>Westminster
+Review.</i></p>
+
+<p>'A sketch which has created such widespread and profound
+interest as this could not be kept in the pages of a voluminous
+encyclopædia. Wellhausen's words necessarily have exceptional
+importance, even in the esteem of those who differ from him <i>toto
+c&oelig;lo</i>.'&mdash;<i>Baptist Magazine.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The profound scholarship of the author does not elevate his
+writing above the interest of the general reader, and a vivid idea
+of the involved Jewish history is obtainable from this volume.'&mdash;<i>Christian
+Advocate.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</a></span></p>
+<hr class="tb"/>
+<p class="center"> <i>Demy 8vo., boards, price 3s. 6d. net.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>A CLASSIFICATION OF VERTEBRATA,</big><br />
+ RECENT AND EXTINCT.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> With Diagnoses and Definitions, a Chapter on Geographical
+ Distribution, and an Etymological Index.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> By HANS GADOW, M.A., <span class="smcap">Ph.D.</span>, F.R.S.,</p>
+
+<p class="center"><small>STRICKLAND CURATOR AND LECTURER ON ZOOLOGY TO THE UNIVERSITY,
+ CAMBRIDGE.</small>
+</p>
+
+<p>'At the end of his work Dr. Gadow adds a useful chapter on the geographical
+distribution of the Vertebrata, with a table showing the approximate number of
+the known recent species. He also gives a fanciful though striking calculation
+to show how some groups are still in the ascendant, while others are distinctly
+declining. The little volume is indeed a welcome addition to the biological
+student's library, and it deserves the wide circulation which its author's eminence
+is likely to ensure for it.'&mdash;<i>Natural Science.</i></p>
+
+<p>'It is a book, it need hardly be said, for the student; it is simply a list of the
+principal sub-divisions of backboned animals, with just as much definition as is
+needed. It may be regarded as an exceedingly concentrated extract of a full
+text-book of the vertebrates.'&mdash;<i>Daily Chronicle.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+<hr class="tb"/>
+
+
+<p class="center"> <i>Demy 8vo., cloth, price 21s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>IN NORTHERN SPAIN.</big></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By Dr. HANS GADOW, M.A., <span class="smcap">Ph.D.</span>, F.R.S.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>Containing Map and 89 Illustrations.</i>
+</p>
+
+<p>'Some years back "Wild Spain," one of the best books of its kind, made you
+desirous of knowing more of the country. And Hans Gadow has deepened this
+feeling in his excellent volume "In Northern Spain," and that to an enormous
+extent. Dwelling at inn or farm, or in their own tent, they saw the country as
+it has been seen but rarely, and they came to know the inhabitants as they can
+be known in no other fashion.'&mdash;<i>Black and White.</i></p>
+
+<p>'To persons visiting the provinces with which the author deals, this book will
+be invaluable, and will do more to point their attention to objects of interest than
+existing guide-books of Spain, most of which are out of date.'&mdash;<i>The Field.</i></p>
+
+<p>'About the best book of European travel that has appeared these many
+years.'&mdash;<i>Literary World.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote">
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> See note,p.<a name="FNanchor_40" id="FNanchor_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40">80.</a> </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> See note, p.<a name="FNanchor_41" id="FNanchor_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41">89.</a></p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_42" id="FNanchor_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42">102</a>, <a name="FNanchor_43" id="FNanchor_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43">106</a>. </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a>
+See note, p. <a name="FNanchor_44" id="FNanchor_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44">80.</a> </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> <i>Perfect</i>, in the sense of highest stage of evolution, may
+seem a <i>petitio principii</i>. Leaving aside the consideration
+that no living creature is absolutely perfect, in the sense that
+its organization cannot become more efficient or proficient,
+we have here to deal with relative perfection of the whole
+organization. A fish or a snake is in its way more specialized
+than a mammal; but specialization does not necessarily
+mean height of development: it generally means life in a
+comparatively narrow groove. The acts of giving birth and
+nourishing the young with the mother's milk is a much
+higher stage than the act of laying eggs and letting them
+run their chance. The development of a hairy coat goes
+along with heightened temperature of the blood, subsequent
+greater independence of the surrounding temperature, and
+increased steady activity of the brain and other nerve-centres.
+The brain of the Mammalia, in its minute structure,
+is much more complex. This rule applies to some of
+the principal sense organs, chiefly the nose and the ear.
+The skeleton, not so much as a whole as in the various bones
+and joints, is more neatly finished, and built up more in
+conformity with 'scientific principles,' than is the case even
+with birds, in spite of their marvellous specialization. The
+same is the case with the vascular system, notably the heart
+and the veins, and with the excretory organs. In all of these
+many imperfections, still to be found in the other classes,
+have been corrected in Mammalia. The Primates take an
+easy first by their hands, and among them the apes and man
+himself by their brains.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> 'Die menschenähnlichen Affen und ihre Organisation
+im Vergleich zur menschlichen.' 1883.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> G. Schwalbe, 'In wiefern ist die menschliche Ohrmuschel ein
+rudimentäres Organ?'&mdash;In what Respects is the Human Outer Ear a
+Rudimentary Organ? (<i>Archiv f. Anatomie und Physiologie</i>, 1889).</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Wiedersheim, 'Der Bau des Menschen als Zeugniss für
+seine Vergangenheit.' Freiburg, 1888. Translated: 'The
+Structure of Man an Index to his Past History.' London,
+1895.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> <i>Pithecanthropus erectus.</i> 'Eine menschenähnliche
+Uebergangsform aus Java' ('A Human-like Transitional
+Form'). Batavia, 1894.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> On the day after the delivery of this address Dr. Dubois
+exhibited the cranium of Pithecanthropus, from which he had
+removed the stony matrix which filled the inside, in order to
+examine the impression left by the cerebral convolutions.
+He was able to show that they also are very human, and
+more highly developed than those of the recent apes.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> L. Manouvier: 'Deuxième étude sur le Pithecanthropus erectus
+comme précurseur présumé de l'homme.' (<i>Bulletins de la Soc.
+d'Anthropologie de Paris</i>, 1895.)</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_45" id="FNanchor_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45">93.</a> </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_46" id="FNanchor_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46">87.</a> </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a>
+</p>
+
+<blockquote>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">F. Ameghino</span>: 'Contribucion al conocimiento de los
+mamíferos de la república Argentina.' In <i>Actas de
+la Academia nacional de Sciencias en Cordoba</i>,
+1889.&mdash;Another article in <i>Revista Argentina de Historia
+natural</i>. Buenos Aires, 1891.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">A. Gaudry</span>: 'Animaux fossiles et géologie de l'Attique.'
+1862.&mdash;'Le Dryopithèque.' <i>Mém. Soc. géol. de
+France</i>: 'Paléontologie.' 1890.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">O. Marsh</span>: 'Introduction and Succession of Vertebrate
+Life in America.' Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci.,
+Nashville, 1887.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">H. F. Osborn</span>: 'The Rise of the Mammalia in North
+America.' Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Madison,
+1893.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">L. Ruetimeyer</span>: 'Ueber die Herkunft unserer Thierwelt,'
+Basel, 1867.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">C. S. Forsyth Major</span>: 'Fossil Monkeys from Madagascar.'
+<i>Geological Magazine</i>, 1896.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">M. Schlosser</span>: 'Ueber die Beziehungen der ausgestorbenen
+Saeugethierfaunen und ihr Verhaeltniss zur Saeugethierfauna
+der Gegenwart.' Biolog. Centralblatt, 1888.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[161</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_47" id="FNanchor_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47">102</a>, <a name="FNanchor_48" id="FNanchor_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48">106</a>. </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[171</span></a>
+See note, p. <a name="FNanchor_49" id="FNanchor_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_49">97</a>.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> Wilhelm Bischoff of Munich: works on the history
+of the development of the rabbit, dog, guinea-pig, roe-deer.
+1840-1854.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[191</span></a>
+See note, p. <a name="FNanchor_50" id="FNanchor_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50">96</a>. </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> 'Ueber die Entwicklung der einfachen Ascidien,' Mém.
+Acad. St. Petersbourg, vii. ser., tome x. (1866). Other
+papers in 'Archiv f. Mikroskop. Anatomie,' vii. (1871); xiii.
+(1877).</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_51" id="FNanchor_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51">102</a>, <a name="FNanchor_52" id="FNanchor_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52">106</a>.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> Similar conditions seem to have prevailed among the
+Proreptilia; but in those of their descendants which have
+specialized into Reptiles and Birds the basi-occipital element
+becomes more and more predominant in that formation
+which ultimately leads to the apparently single condyle.
+Hence it is misleading to divide the Tetrapoda into the two
+main groups of Amphi-and Mono-condylia, and therefrom
+to conclude that the two-condyled Mammalia are more
+closely related to the likewise amphicondylous Amphibia
+than to the so-called monocondylous Reptiles.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> 'Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf
+Ceylon,' vols. 4 and 5. (With an atlas of 84 plates; 1893.)</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> 'Principles of Biology': 'The Factors of Organic Evolution';
+'The Inadequacy of Natural Selection.'</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> Abridged from Haeckel's 'Systematische Phylogenie
+der Vertebraten,' § 14.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> That this great work is now comparatively rare, although
+still in the second-hand market, may perhaps be urged in
+excuse of the fact of so many attempts made by many authors,
+both professional and amateur, to find fault with or to
+explain the principles of adaptation, variation, heredity,
+cænogenesis, phylogeny, etc., in complete ignorance that
+all these and many more fundamental questions were fully
+discussed more than thirty years ago in the 'Generelle Morphologie.'</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> James Croll: 'On Geological Time, and the Probable
+Date of the Glacial and Upper Miocene Period,' <i>Philos.
+Magazine</i>, xxxv., 1868, pp. 363-384; xxxvi., pp. 141-154;
+362-386.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> William Thomson: 'On the Secular Cooling of the
+Earth,' <i>Transact. R. S. Edinb.</i>, xxiii., 1864, pp. 157-169.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> 'Geological Time as indicated by the Sedimentary
+Rocks of North America.' <i>Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci.</i>,
+xlii., 1893, pp. 129-169.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> Henry Shaler Williams, 'Geological Biology.' New
+York, 1895.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<p class= "transnote">
+Transcriber's Notes<br />
+
+ Variations in spelling, punctuation and hyphenation have been retained
+ except in obvious cases of typographical errors.
+ Inconsistent hyphenation and spelling are as in the original.
+ The layout of the chart Ancestral Tree of The Mammalia has been changed
+ from the original to enhance clarity, the essential relationships have
+ been preserved.
+ The second reference to footnote 3, in the same paragraph as the first,
+ has been left blind as it is redundant.
+</p>
+
+<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44541 ***</div>
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/44541-h/images/cover.jpg b/44541-h/images/cover.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd90753
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44541-h/images/cover.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/44541-h/images/i_0231.jpg b/44541-h/images/i_0231.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52420cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44541-h/images/i_0231.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/44541-h/images/i_0331.jpg b/44541-h/images/i_0331.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..263fc4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/44541-h/images/i_0331.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..512b093
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #44541 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44541)
diff --git a/old/44541-8.txt b/old/44541-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5aaf0b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3418 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Last Link
+ Our Present Knowledge of the Descent of Man
+
+Author: Ernst Haeckel
+
+Commentator: Hans Gadow
+
+Release Date: December 29, 2013 [EBook #44541]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAST LINK ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Les Galloway and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+ OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE
+ DESCENT OF MAN
+
+ BY
+
+ ERNST HAECKEL
+ (JENA)
+
+ WITH NOTES AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES
+
+ BY
+
+ HANS GADOW, F.R.S.
+ (CAMBRIDGE)
+
+
+ LONDON
+ ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK
+ 1898
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+ PAGE
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+ INTRODUCTORY 1
+
+ COMPARATIVE ANATOMY 8
+
+ PALÆONTOLOGY 20
+
+ OTHER EVIDENCE 42
+
+ STAGES RECAPITULATED 47
+
+ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES:
+
+ LAMARCK, SAINT-HILAIRE, CUVIER, BAER,
+ MUELLER, VIRCHOW, COPE, KOELLIKER, GEGENBAUR,
+ HAECKEL 80
+
+ THEORY OF CELLS 115
+
+ FACTORS OF EVOLUTION 117
+
+ GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION 135
+
+
+
+ NOTE
+
+
+The address I delivered on August 26 at the Fourth International
+Congress of Zoology at Cambridge, 'On our Present Knowledge of the
+Descent of Man,' has, I find, from the high significance of the theme
+and the general importance of the questions connected with it, excited
+much interest, and has led to requests for its publication. Hence this
+volume, edited by my friend Dr. H. Gadow, my pupil in earlier days,
+who has not only revised the text, but has also enriched it by many
+valuable additions and notes.
+
+ ERNST HAECKEL.
+
+_Jena, December, 1898._
+
+
+
+
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+
+At the end of the nineteenth century, the age of 'natural science,' the
+department of knowledge that has made most progress is zoology. From
+zoology has arisen the study of transformism, which now dominates the
+whole of biology. Lamarck[1] laid its foundation in 1809, and forty
+years ago Charles Darwin obtained for it a recognition which is now
+universal. It is not my task to repeat the well-known principles of
+Darwinism. I am not concerned to explain the scientific value of the
+whole theory of descent. The whole of our biological study is pervaded
+by it. No general problem in zoology and botany, in anatomy and
+physiology, can be discussed without the question arising, How has this
+problem originated? What are the real causes of its development?
+
+ [1] See note, p. 80.
+
+This question was almost unknown seventy years ago, when Charles
+Darwin, the great reformer of biology, began his academical career at
+Cambridge as a student of theology. In the same year, 1828, Carl Ernst
+von Baer[2] published in Germany his classical work on the embryology
+of animals, the first successful attempt to elucidate by 'observation
+and reflection' the mysterious origin of the animal body from the
+egg, and to explain in every respect the 'history of the growing
+individuality.' Darwin at that time had no knowledge of this great
+advance, and he could not divine that forty years later embryology
+would be one of the strongest supports of his own life's work--of that
+very theory of transformism which, founded by Lamarck in the year of
+Darwin's birth, was accepted with enthusiasm by Charles's grandfather
+Erasmus. There is no doubt that of all the celebrated naturalists of
+the nineteenth century Darwin achieved the greatest success, and we
+should be justified in designating the last forty years as the Age of
+Darwin.
+
+ [2] See note, p. 89.
+
+In searching for the causes of this unexampled success, we must clearly
+separate three sets of considerations: first, the comprehensive reform
+of Lamarck's transformism, and its firm establishment by the many
+arguments drawn from modern biology; secondly, the construction of the
+new theory of selection, as established by Darwin, and independently
+by Alfred Wallace (a theory called Darwinism in the proper sense);
+thirdly, the deduction of anthropogeny, that most important conclusion
+of the theory of descent, the value of which far surpasses all the
+other truths in evolution.
+
+It is the third point of Darwin's theory that I shall discuss here; and
+I shall discuss it chiefly with the intention of examining critically
+the evidence and the different conclusions which at present represent
+our scientific knowledge of the descent of man and of the different
+stages of his animal pedigree.
+
+It is now generally admitted that this problem is the most important
+of all biological questions. Huxley was right when in 1863 he called
+it the question of questions for mankind. The problem which underlies
+all others, and is more deeply interesting than any other, is as
+to the place which man occupies in nature and his relations to the
+universe of things. 'Whence our race has come; what are the limits of
+our power over nature, and of nature's power over us; to what goal are
+we tending--these are the problems which present themselves anew and
+with undiminished interest to every man born into the world.' This
+impressive view was explained by Huxley thirty-five years ago in his
+three celebrated essays on 'Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature.' The
+first is entitled 'On the Natural History of the Man-like Apes'; the
+second, 'On the Relations of Man to the Lower Animals'; the third, 'On
+some Fossil Remains of Man.' Darwin himself felt the burden of these
+problems as much as Huxley; but in his chief work, 'On the Origin of
+Species,' in 1859, he had purposely only just touched them, suggesting
+that the theory of descent would shed light upon the origin of man and
+his history. Twelve years later, in his celebrated work on 'The Descent
+of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex,' Darwin discussed fully and
+ingeniously all the different sides of this 'question of questions'
+from the morphological, historical, physiological, and psychological
+points of view. As early as 1866 I myself had applied in the _Generelle
+Morphologie der Organismen_ the theory of transformism to anthropology,
+and had shown that the fundamental law of biogeny claims the same
+value for man as for all the other animals. The intimate causal
+connection between ontogeny and phylogeny, between the development of
+the individual and the history of its ancestors, enables us to gain
+a safe and certain knowledge of our ancestral series. I had at that
+time distinguished in this series ten chief degrees of vertebrate
+organization. I attributed the highest importance to the logical
+connection of anthropogeny with transformism. If the latter be true,
+the truth of the former is absolute. 'Our theory that man is descended
+from lower vertebrates, and immediately from apes or primates, is a
+case of special _deduction_ which follows with absolute certainty from
+the general _induction_ of the theory of descent.' The full proof and
+detailed explanation of this view was afterwards given in my 'History
+of Natural Creation,' and especially in my 'Anthropogeny.'[3] Lastly,
+it has received an ample scientific and critical foundation in the
+third part of my 'Systematic Phylogeny.'[3]
+
+ [3] See notes, pp. 102, 106
+
+During the forty years which have elapsed since Darwin's first
+publication of his theories an enormous literature, discussing the
+_general problems_ of transformism as well as its special application
+to man, has been published. In spite of the wide divergence of the
+different views, all agree in one main point: the natural development
+of man cannot be separated from general transformism. There are only
+two possibilities. Either all the various species of animals and
+plants have been created independently by supernatural forces (and
+in this case the creation of man also is a miracle); or the species
+have been produced in a natural way by transmutation, by adaptation
+and progressive heredity (and in this case man also is descended from
+other vertebrates, and immediately from a series of primates). We are
+absolutely convinced that only the latter theory is fully scientific.
+To prove its truth, we have to examine critically the strength of the
+different arguments claimed for it.
+
+
+
+
+ I.
+
+
+First, we have to consider the relative place which comparative
+anatomy concedes to man in the 'natural system' of animals, for the
+true value of our 'natural classification' is based upon its meaning
+as a pedigree. All the minor and major groups of the system--the
+classes, legions, orders, families, genera, and species--are only
+different branches of the same pedigree. For man himself, his place
+in the pedigree has been fixed since Lamarck,[4] in 1801, defined the
+group of vertebrates. The most perfect[5] of these are the Mammalia;
+and at the head of this class stands the order of Primates, in which
+Linnæus, in 1735, united four 'genera'--Homo, Simia, Lemur, and
+Vespertilio. If we exclude the last-named, the Chiroptera of modern
+zoology, there remain three natural groups of Primates--the Lemures,
+the Simiæ, and the Anthropi or Hominidæ. This is the classification of
+the majority of zoologists; but if we compare man with the two chief
+groups of monkeys--the Eastern monkeys (or Catarrhinæ) and the Western
+or American monkeys (Platyrrhinæ)--there can be no doubt that the
+former group is much more closely related to man than is the latter.
+In the natural order of the Catarrhinæ we find united a long series
+of lower and higher forms. The lowest, the Cynopitheci, appear still
+closely related to the Platyrrhinæ and to the Lemures; while, on the
+other hand, the tailless apes (Anthropomorphæ) approach man through
+their higher organization. Hence one of our best authorities on the
+Primates, Robert Hartmann,[6] proposed to subdivide the whole order of
+the Simiæ into three groups: (1) Primarii, man together with the other
+Anthropomorphæ, or tailless apes; (2) Simiæ, all the other monkeys; (3)
+Prosimiæ, or Lemurs. This arrangement has received strong support from
+the interesting discovery by Selenka that the peculiar placentation
+of the human embryo is the same as in the great apes, and different
+from that of all the other monkeys. Our choice between these different
+classifications of Primates is best determined by the important thesis
+of Huxley, in which, in 1863, he carried out a most careful and
+critical comparison of all the anatomical gradations within this order.
+In my opinion, this ingenious thesis--which I have called the Huxleyan
+Law, or the 'Pithecometra-thesis of Huxley'--is of the utmost value.
+It runs as follows: 'Thus, whatever system of organs be studied, the
+comparison of their modifications in the ape-series leads to one and
+the same result--that the structural differences which separate man
+from the gorilla and the chimpanzee are not so great as those which
+separate the gorilla from the lower apes.' If we accept the Huxleyan
+law without prejudice, and apply it to the natural classification of
+the Primates, we must concede that man's place is within the order
+of the Simiæ. On examining this relation with care, and judging
+with logical persistence, we may even go a step further. Instead of
+the wider conception of 'Simiæ,' we must use the restricted term of
+Catarrhinæ, and our Pithecometra-thesis has then to be formulated
+as follows: _The comparative anatomy of all organs of the group of
+Catarrhine Simiæ leads to the result that the morphological differences
+between man and the great apes are not so great as are those between
+the man-like apes and the lowest Catarrhinæ_. In fact, it is very
+difficult to show why man should not be classed with the large apes in
+the same zoological family. We all know a man from an ape; but it is
+quite another thing to find differences which are absolute and not of
+degree only. Speaking generally, we may say that man alone combines the
+four following features: (1) Erect walk; (2) extremities differentiated
+accordingly; (3) articulate speech; (4) higher reasoning power. Speech
+and reason are obviously relative distinctions only--the direct result
+of more brains and more brain-power, the so-called mental faculties.
+The erect walk is not an absolutely distinguishing characteristic: the
+large apes likewise walk on their feet only, supporting their bodies
+by touching the ground with the backs of their hands--in fact, with
+their knuckles--and this is a mode of progression very different from
+that of the tailed monkeys, which walk upon the palms of their hands.
+There are, however, two obvious differences in the development of the
+muscles. In man alone the gastrocnemius and the soleus muscle are thick
+enough to form the calf of the leg, and the glutæus maximus is enlarged
+into the buttocks. A fourth glutæal muscle occurs occasionally in
+man, while it is constantly present in apes as the so-called musculus
+scansorius. Concerning the muscles of the whole body, we cannot do
+better than quote Testut's summary: 'The mass of recorded observations
+upon the muscular anomalies in man is so great, and the agreement of
+many of these with the condition normal in apes is so marked, that the
+gap which usually separates the muscular system of man from that of the
+apes appears to be completely bridged over.'
+
+ [4] See note, p. 80.
+
+ [5] _Perfect_, in the sense of highest stage of evolution, may seem a
+ _petitio principii_. Leaving aside the consideration that no living
+ creature is absolutely perfect, in the sense that its organization
+ cannot become more efficient or proficient, we have here to deal with
+ relative perfection of the whole organization. A fish or a snake is in
+ its way more specialized than a mammal; but specialization does not
+ necessarily mean height of development: it generally means life in a
+ comparatively narrow groove. The acts of giving birth and nourishing
+ the young with the mother's milk is a much higher stage than the act
+ of laying eggs and letting them run their chance. The development of
+ a hairy coat goes along with heightened temperature of the blood,
+ subsequent greater independence of the surrounding temperature, and
+ increased steady activity of the brain and other nerve-centres. The
+ brain of the Mammalia, in its minute structure, is much more complex.
+ This rule applies to some of the principal sense organs, chiefly the
+ nose and the ear. The skeleton, not so much as a whole as in the
+ various bones and joints, is more neatly finished, and built up more
+ in conformity with 'scientific principles,' than is the case even with
+ birds, in spite of their marvellous specialization. The same is the
+ case with the vascular system, notably the heart and the veins, and
+ with the excretory organs. In all of these many imperfections, still
+ to be found in the other classes, have been corrected in Mammalia. The
+ Primates take an easy first by their hands, and among them the apes and
+ man himself by their brains.
+
+ [6] 'Die menschenähnlichen Affen und ihre Organisation im Vergleich zur
+ menschlichen.' 1883.
+
+There are, for example, the muscles of the ear. In most people the
+majority, or even all of them, are no longer movable at will, while in
+the apes they are still in use. The important point, however, is that
+these muscles are still present in man, although often in a reduced
+condition. They are the following: (1) Musculus auricularis anterior
+or attrahens auris, which is frequently much reduced and no longer
+reaches the ear at all, being then absolutely useless; (2) Musculus
+auricularis superior or attollens auris, more constant than the former;
+(3) Musculus auricularis posterior or retrahens auris, likewise often
+functional. Occasionally smaller slips differentiated from these
+three muscles are present, and as so-called intrinsic muscles are
+restricted to the ear itself; their function is, or was, that of
+curling up or opening the external ear.
+
+[Illustration: OUTLINES OF THE LEFT EAR OF--
+
+1. _Lemur macaco_; 2. _Macacus rhesus_, the Rhesus monkey; 3.
+Cercopithecus, a macaque; 4. human embryo of six months; 5. man, with
+Darwin's point well retained: the dotted outline is that of the ear of
+a baboon; 6. orang-utan (after G. Schwalbe):[7] ^x the original tip of
+the ear; 7. human ear with the principal muscles.
+
+ [7] G. Schwalbe, 'In wiefern ist die menschliche Ohrmuschel ein
+ rudimentäres Organ?'--In what Respects is the Human Outer Ear a
+ Rudimentary Organ? (_Archiv f. Anatomie und Physiologie_, 1889).]
+
+In connection with the ear, I may touch upon another interesting
+and most suggestive little feature which is present in many
+individuals--namely, 'Darwin's point.' This is the last remnant of the
+original tip of the ear, before the outer, upper, and hinder rim became
+doubled up or folded in. It is a feature quite useless, and absolutely
+impossible of interpretation, excepting as the vestige of such previous
+ancestral conditions as are normal in the monkeys.
+
+In some cases the reduction of muscles has proceeded further in apes
+than in man--for example, the muscles of the little toe. Another
+instance is afforded by the coccyx or vestige of the tail; this is
+still furnished with muscles which are now in man, as well as in
+the apes, quite useless, and vary considerably with every sign of
+degeneration, most so in the orang-utan.
+
+Darwin has mentioned the frequent action of the 'snarling muscle,' by
+which, in sneering, our upper canine teeth are exposed, like those of a
+dog prepared to fight.
+
+Monkeys and apes possess vocal sacs, especially large in the
+orang-utan; survivals of them, although no longer used, persist in man
+in the shape of a pair of small diverticula, the pouches of Morgagni,
+between the true and the false vocal cords.
+
+'In the native Australians, the dental formula appears least removed
+from the hypothetical original type, for in it are still found complete
+rows of splendid teeth, with powerfully-developed canines and molars,
+the latter being either uniform, or even increasing in size, as we
+proceed backwards, in such a way that the wisdom tooth is the largest
+of the series. This is decidedly a pithecoid characteristic which is
+always found in apes. The upper incisors of the Malay, apart from their
+prognathous disposition, have occasionally a distinctly pithecoid
+form, their anterior surface being convex, and their lingual surface
+slightly concave. The ancestors of Europeans seem to have had the same
+form of teeth, for the oldest existing fragments of skulls from the
+Mammoth age (_e.g._, the jaws from La Naulette, in Belgium) reveal
+tooth-forms which must be classed with those of the lowest races of
+to-day.'[8]
+
+ [8] Wiedersheim, 'Der Bau des Menschen als Zeugniss für seine
+ Vergangenheit.' Freiburg, 1888. Translated: 'The Structure of Man an
+ Index to his Past History.' London, 1895.
+
+Now we are able to apply this fundamental Pithecometra-thesis directly
+to the classification of the Primates and to the phylogeny of man,
+which is intimately connected with it, because in this order, as in
+all the other groups of animals, the natural system is the clear
+expression of true phylogenetic affinity. Four results follow from our
+thesis: (1) The Primates, as the highest legion or order of mammals,
+form one natural, monophyletic group. All the Lemures, Simiæ, and
+Homines descend from one common ancestral form, from a hypothetical
+'Archiprimas.' (2) The Lemures are the older and lower of the natural
+groups of the Primates; they stand between the oldest Placentalia
+(Prochoriata) and the true Simiæ. (3) All the Catarrhinæ, or Eastern
+Simiæ, form one natural monophyletic group. Their hypothetical
+common ancestor, the Archipithecus, may have descended directly or
+indirectly from a branch of the Lemures. (4) Man is descended directly
+from one series of extinct Catarrhine ancestors. The more recent
+ancestors of this series were tailless anthropoids (similar to the
+Anthropopithecus), with five sacral vertebræ. The more remote ancestors
+were tailed Cercopitheci, with three or four sacral vertebræ.
+
+These four theses possess, in my opinion, absolute certainty.
+They are independent of all future anatomical, embryological, and
+palæontological discoveries which may possibly throw more light upon
+the details of our phyletic anthropogenesis.
+
+
+
+
+ II.
+
+
+The next question is, how the facts of palæontology agree with these
+most important results of comparative anatomy and ontogeny. The fossils
+are the true historical 'medals of creation,' the palpable evidence of
+the historical succession of all those innumerable organic forms which
+have peopled the globe for many millions of years. Here the question
+arises, If the known fossil specimens of Mammalia, and particularly
+of Primates, give proof of these Pithecometra-theses, do they confirm
+directly the descent of man from ape-like creatures? The answer to this
+question is, in my opinion, affirmative.
+
+It is true that the gaps in the palæontological evidence, here as
+elsewhere, are many and keenly felt. In the order of the Primates
+they are greater than in many other orders, chiefly because of the
+arboreal life of our ancestors. The explanation is very simple. It is
+really due to a long chain of favourable coincidences if the skeleton
+of a vertebrate, covered as it was with flesh and skin, and containing
+still more perishable viscera, is petrified at all. The body may be
+devoured by other creatures, and its bones scattered about; or it rots
+away and crumbles to pieces. Many animals hide in thick undergrowth
+when death approaches them; and, leading an almost entirely arboreal
+life, the Primates are especially likely to disappear without being
+fossilized. It is only when the body is quickly covered with sand, or
+is embedded in suitable lime or silica containing mud, that the process
+of petrifaction can come to pass. Even then it is only by great good
+luck that we come across such a fossil. Very few countries have been
+searched systematically, and the areas that have been searched amount
+to little in comparison with the whole surface of the land, even if we
+leave out of account the fact that more than two-thirds of the globe
+are covered by water.
+
+These deplorable deficiencies of empirical palæontology are balanced
+on the other side by a growing number of positive facts, which possess
+an inestimable value in human phylogeny. The most interesting and most
+important of these is the celebrated fossil _Pithecanthropus erectus_,
+discovered in Java in 1894 by Dr. Eugène Dubois.[9] Three years ago
+this now famous ape-like man provoked an animated discussion at the
+third International Zoological Congress at Leyden. I may therefore
+be allowed to say a few words as to its scientific significance.
+Unfortunately, the fossil remains of this creature are very scanty: the
+skull-cap, a femur, and two teeth. It is obviously impossible to form
+from these scanty remains a complete and satisfactory reconstruction of
+this remarkable Pliocene Primate.
+
+[9] _Pithecanthropus erectus._ 'Eine menschenähnliche Uebergangsform
+aus Java' ('A Human-like Transitional Form'). Batavia, 1894.
+
+The more important points are the following: The remains in question
+rested upon a conglomerate which lies upon a bed of marine marl and
+sand of Pliocene age. Together with the bones of Pithecanthropus were
+found those of Stegodon, Leptobos, Rhinoceros, Sus, Felis, Hyæna,
+Hippopotamus, Tapir, Elephas, and a gigantic Pangolin. It is remarkable
+that the first two of these genera are now extinct, and that neither
+hippopotamus nor hyæna exists any longer in the Oriental region. If we
+may judge from these fossil remains, the bones of Pithecanthropus are
+not younger than the oldest Pleistocene, and probably belong to the
+upper Pliocene. The teeth are like those of man. The femur, also, is
+very human, but shows some resemblances to that of the gibbons. Its
+size, however, indicates an animal which stood when erect not less
+than 5 feet 6 inches high. The skull-cap also is very human, but with
+very prominent eyebrow ridges, like those of the famous Neanderthal
+cranium. It is certainly not that of an idiot. It had an estimated
+cranial capacity of about 1,000 cubic centimetres--that is to say, much
+more than that of the largest ape, which possesses not more than 600
+c.c. The crania of female Australians and Veddahs measure not more than
+1,100, some even less than 1,000 c.c.; but, as these Veddah women stand
+only about 4 feet 9 inches high, the computed cranial capacity of the
+much taller Pithecanthropus is comparatively very low indeed.[10]
+
+ [10] On the day after the delivery of this address Dr. Dubois exhibited
+ the cranium of Pithecanthropus, from which he had removed the stony
+ matrix which filled the inside, in order to examine the impression left
+ by the cerebral convolutions. He was able to show that they also are
+ very human, and more highly developed than those of the recent apes. [
+ Illustration: The upper figure represents the outlines
+ of the skull of Pithecanthropus, as restored by Manouvier.[11] The
+ lower figure shows the comparative size and shape of Pithecanthropus,
+ the Neanderthal skull, a specimen of the Cro-Magnon race of neolithic
+ France, and a Young Chimpanzee before the full development of the
+ supraorbital crests.]
+
+ [11] L. Manouvier: 'Deuxième étude sur le Pithecanthropus erectus comme
+ précurseur présumé de l'homme.' (_Bulletins de la Soc. d'Anthropologie
+ de Paris_, 1895.)
+
+The final result of the long discussion at Leyden was that, of twelve
+experts present, three held that the fossil remains belonged to a low
+race of man; three declared them to be those of a man-like ape of great
+size; the rest maintained that they belonged to an intermediate
+form, which directly connected primitive man with the anthropoid
+apes. This last view is the right one, and accords with the laws of
+logical inference. _Pithecanthropus erectus_ of Dubois is truly a
+Pliocene remainder of that famous group of highest Catarrhines which
+were the immediate pithecoid ancestors of man. He is, indeed, the
+long-searched-for 'missing link,' for which, in 1866, I myself had
+proposed the hypothetical genus Pithecanthropus, species Alalus.
+
+It must, however, be admitted that this opinion is still strongly
+combated by some distinguished authorities. At the Leyden Congress it
+was attacked by the illustrious pathologist Rudolf Virchow.[12] He,
+however, is one of the minority of leading men of science who set
+themselves to refute the theory of Evolution in every possible way. For
+thirty years he has defended the thesis: 'It is quite certain that man
+is not a descendant of apes.' He declares any intermediate form to be
+unimaginable save in a dream.
+
+ [12] See Notes, p. 93.
+
+Virchow went to the Leyden Congress with the set purpose of disproving
+that the bones found by Dubois belonged to a creature which linked
+together apes and man. First, he maintained that the skull was that
+of an ape, while the thigh belonged to man. This insinuation was at
+once refuted by the expert palæontologists, who declared that without
+the slightest doubt the bones belonged to one and the same individual.
+Next, Virchow explained that certain exostoses or growths observable on
+the thigh proved its human nature, since only under careful treatment
+the patient could have healed the original injury. Thereupon Professor
+Marsh, the celebrated palæontologist, exhibited a number of thigh-bones
+of wild monkeys which showed similar exostoses and had healed without
+hospital treatment. As a last argument the Berlin pathologist declared
+that the deep constriction behind the upper margin of the orbits
+proved that the skull was that of an ape, as such never occurred in
+man. It so happened that a few weeks later Professor Nehring of Berlin
+demonstrated exactly the same formation on a human prehistoric skull
+received by him from Santos, in Brazil.
+
+Virchow was, in fact, just as unlucky in Leyden in his fight with our
+pliocene ancestor as he had been unfortunate in his opinion on the
+famous skulls of Neanderthal, Spy, La Naulette, etc., every one of which
+he explained as a pathological abnormality. It would be a very curious
+coincidence indeed if all these and other fossil human remains were
+those of idiots or otherwise abnormal individuals, provided they are
+old and low enough in their organization to be of phylogenetic value to
+the unbiassed zoologist.
+
+As the sworn adversary of Evolution, transformism, and Darwinism in
+particular, but a believer in the constancy of species, the great and
+renowned pathologist has been driven to the incredible contention that
+all variations of organic forms are pathological.
+
+Four years ago, as honorary president of the Anthropological Congress
+at Vienna, he attacked Darwinism in the severest manner, and declared
+that 'man may be as well descended from the elephant or from the sheep
+as from the ape.' Such attacks on the theory of transformism indicate a
+failure to understand the principles of the theory of Evolution and to
+appreciate the significance of palæontology, comparative anatomy, and
+ontogeny.
+
+The thousands of other objections which have been made during the last
+forty years (chiefly by outsiders) may be passed over in silence. They
+do not require serious refutation. In spite of, or perhaps because of,
+these attacks, the theory of Evolution stands established more firmly
+than ever.
+
+It is easy for the outsider to exult over the difficulties which our
+problem implies--difficulties which we who have given our lives to the
+study understand likewise, and try our best not only to bridge over,
+but also to point out. Anyhow, we do not conceal them; while those who
+reject the explanation offered by Evolution make the most of the gaps,
+and pass silently over the far more numerous points favourable to our
+theory.
+
+How fruitful during the last thirty years the astonishing progress in
+our palæontological knowledge has been for our Pithecometra-thesis is
+best shown by a short glance at the growth of our knowledge of fossil
+Primates. Cuvier,[13] the founder of palæontology, continued up to the
+time of his death, in 1832, to assert that fossil remains of monkeys
+and lemurs did not exist. The only skull of a fossil lemuroid which
+he described (namely, Adapis) he declared to be that of an ungulate.
+Not until 1836 were the first fragments of extinct monkeys found in
+India; it was two years later, near Athens, that the skeleton of
+_Mesopithecus penthelicus_ was discovered. Other remains of lemurs were
+found in 1862. But during the last twenty years the number of fossil
+Primates has been augmented by the remarkable discoveries of Gaudry,
+Filhol, Milne Edwards, Seeley, Schlosser, and others in Europe; of
+Marsh, Cope, Osborn, Leidy, Ameghino, in South America; and Forsyth
+Major in Madagascar.[14] These tertiary remains, chiefly of Eocene and
+Miocene date, fill many gaps between existing genera of Primates, and
+afford us quite a clear insight into the phyletic development of this
+order during the millions of years of the Cænozoic age.
+
+ [13] See notes, p. 87.
+
+ [14]
+ F. AMEGHINO: 'Contribucion al conocimiento de los mamíferos
+ de la república Argentina.' In _Actas de la Academia nacional de
+ Sciencias en Cordoba_, 1889.--Another article in _Revista Argentina de
+ Historia natural_. Buenos Aires, 1891.
+
+ A. GAUDRY: 'Animaux fossiles et géologie de l'Attique.'
+ 1862.--'Le Dryopithèque.' _Mém. Soc. géol. de France_:
+ 'Paléontologie.' 1890.
+
+ O. MARSH: 'Introduction and Succession of Vertebrate Life in
+ America.' Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Nashville, 1887.
+
+ H. F. OSBORN: 'The Rise of the Mammalia in North America.'
+ Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Madison, 1893.
+
+ L. RUETIMEYER: 'Ueber die Herkunft unserer Thierwelt,' Basel,
+ 1867.
+
+ C. S. FORSYTH MAJOR: 'Fossil Monkeys from Madagascar.'
+ _Geological Magazine_, 1896.
+
+ M. SCHLOSSER: 'Ueber die Beziehungen der ausgestorbenen
+ Saeugethierfaunen und ihr Verhaeltniss zur Saeugethierfauna der
+ Gegenwart.' Biolog. Centralblatt, 1888.
+
+The most important difference between the two groups of existing
+monkeys is indicated by their dentition. Adult man possesses, like
+all the other Catarrhine Simiæ, thirty-two teeth, whilst the American
+monkeys (the Platyrrhinæ) have thirty-six teeth--namely, one pair of
+premolars more in the upper and lower jaws. Comparative odontology
+leads us to the phylogenetic conclusion that this number has been
+produced by reduction from a still older form with forty-four teeth.
+This typical dental formula (three incisors, one canine, four
+premolars, and three molars, in each half-jaw) is common to all those
+most important older mammals which in the beginning of the Eocene
+period constituted the four large groups of Lemuravida, Condylarthra,
+Esthonychida, and Ictopsida. These are the four ancestral groups
+of the four main orders of Placentalia--namely, of the Primates,
+Ungulata, Rodentia, and Carnassia. They seem to be so closely related
+by their primitive organization that they may be united in one common
+super-order, Prochoriata.
+
+With a considerable degree of probability, we are led to formulate
+the further hypothesis that all the orders of Placentalia--from the
+lowest Prochoriata upwards to man--have descended from some unknown
+common ancestor living in the Cretaceous period, and that this oldest
+placental form originated from some Jurassic group of marsupials.
+
+Among these numerous fossil Lemures which have been discovered within
+the last twenty years, there exist, indeed, all the connecting forms
+of the older series of Primates, all the 'missing links' sought for by
+comparative odontology.
+
+The oldest Lemures of the tertiary age are the Eocene Pachylemures,
+or Hyopsodina. They possess the complete dentition of the
+Prochoriata--namely, forty-four teeth (3.1.4.3/3.1.4.3). Then follow
+the Eocene Palæolemures, or Adapida, with forty teeth, they having lost
+one pair of incisors in each jaw. To these are attached the younger
+Autolemures, or Stenopida, with thirty-six teeth, they thus possessing
+already the same dentition as the Platyrrhinæ. The characteristic
+dentition of the Catarrhinæ is derived from this formula by the loss of
+another premolar.
+
+These relations are so clear and so closely connected with a
+gradual transformation of the whole skull, and with the progressive
+differentiation of the Primate-form, that we are justified in saying
+that the pedigree of the Primates, from the oldest Eocene Lemures
+upwards to man, is now so well known, its principal features so firmly
+fixed within the Tertiary age, that there is no missing link whatever.
+
+Quite different, and much more incomplete, is the palæontological
+evidence, if we go further back into the Secondary or Mesozoic age,
+and look there for the older ancestors of the mammalian series. There
+we meet everywhere with wide gaps, and the scarce fragments of fossil
+Mesozoic mammals (excessively rare in the Cretaceous formation) are too
+poor to permit definite conclusions as to their systematic position.
+Indeed, comparative anatomy and ontogeny lead us to the hypothesis
+that the oldest Cretaceous Mammalia--the Prochoriata--are descended
+from Jurassic marsupials, and these again from Monotremes. We may
+also suppose with high probability that among the unknown Cretaceous
+Prochoriata there have been Lemuravida and forms intermediate between
+these and the Jurassic Amphitheriidæ, and that these marsupials in
+their turn are descendants of Pantotheria or similar monotreme-like
+creatures of the Triassic age. Any certain evidence for these
+hypotheses is at present still wanting. One important fact, however,
+is established--namely, that these interesting and oldest Mammalia--the
+Pantotheria of Marsh, the Triassic Dromatheriidæ, and the Jurassic
+Triconodontidæ of Osborn--were small insectivorous mammals with a very
+primitive organization. Probably they were Monotremes, and may be
+derived directly from Permian Sauromammalia, an ill-defined mixture of
+Mammalia and Reptilia.
+
+This generalized characteristic supports our view that _the whole
+class of Mammalia is monophyletic_, and that all its members, from
+the oldest Monotremes upwards to man, have descended from one common
+ancestor living in the older Triassic, or perhaps in the Permian,
+age. To acquire full conviction of this important conception, we have
+only to think of the hair and the glands of our human skin, of our
+diaphragm, the heart and the blood corpuscles without a nucleus, our
+skull with its squamoso-mandibular articulation. All these singular
+and striking modifications of the vertebrate organization are common
+to mammals, and distinguish them clearly from the other Craniota. This
+characteristic combination and correlation proves that they have been
+developed only _once_ in the history of the vertebrate stem, and that
+they have been transferred by heredity from one common ancestor to all
+the members of the class of Mammalia.
+
+The next step, as we trace our human phylogeny to its origin, leads us
+further back into the lower Vertebrata, into that obscure Palæozoic
+age the immeasurable length of which (much greater than that of the
+Mesozoic) may, according to one of the newest geological calculations,
+have comprised about one thousand millions of years.[15]
+
+ [15] See note, 'Geological Time and Evolution' p. 134.
+
+The first important fact we have to face here is the complete absence
+of mammalian remains. Instead of these we find in the later Palæozoic
+period, the Permian, air-breathing _reptiles_ as the earliest
+representatives of Amniota. They belong to the most primitive order
+of that class, the Tocosauria; and besides them there were the
+Theromorpha, which approach the Mammalia in a remarkable manner. These
+reptiles in turn were preceded, in the Carboniferous period, by true
+Amphibia, most of them belonging to the armour-clad Stegocephali.
+These interesting Progonamphibia were the oldest Tetrapoda, the first
+vertebrates which had adapted themselves to the terrestrial mode of
+life; in them the swimming fin of fishes and Dipneusta was transformed
+into the pentadactyle extremities characteristic of quadrupeds.
+
+To appreciate the high importance of this metamorphosis, we need only
+compare the skeleton of our own human limbs with that of the living
+Amphibia. We find in the latter the same characteristic composition as
+in man: the same shoulder and pelvic girdle; the same single bone, the
+humerus or the femur, followed by the same pair of bones in the forearm
+and leg; then the same skeletal elements composing the wrist and the
+ankle regions; and, lastly, the same five fingers and toes.
+
+The arrangement of these bones, peculiar and often complicated, but
+everywhere essentially the same in all the Tetrapoda, is a striking
+evidence that man is a descendant from the oldest pentadactyle Amphibia
+of the Carboniferous period. In man the pentadactyle type has been
+better preserved by constant heredity than in many other Mammalia,
+notably the Ungulata.
+
+The oldest Carboniferous Amphibia, the armour-clad Stegocephali, and
+especially the remarkable Branchiosauri discovered by Credner, are
+now regarded by all competent zoologists as the indubitable common
+ancestral group of all Tetrapoda, comprising both Amphibia and Amniota.
+But whence this most remote group of Tetrapoda? That difficult question
+is answered by the marvellous progress of modern palæontology, and
+the answer is in complete harmony with the older results arrived
+at by comparative anatomy and ontogeny. Thirty-four years ago Carl
+Gegenbaur,[16] the great living master of comparative anatomy, had
+demonstrated in a series of works how the skeletal parts of the various
+classes of Vertebrata, especially the skull and the limbs, still
+represent a continuous scale of phyletic gradations. Apart from the
+Cyclostomes, there are the fishes, and among them the Elasmobranchi
+(sharks and rays), which have best preserved the original structure in
+all its essential parts of organization. Closely connected with the
+Elasmobranchi are the Crossopterygii, and with these the Dipneusta or
+Dipnoi. Among the latter the highest importance attaches to the ancient
+Australian Ceratodus. Its organization and development is now, at last,
+becoming well known. This transitional group of Dipnoi, 'fishes with
+lungs' but without pentadactyle limbs, is the morphological bridge
+which joins the Ganoids and the oldest Amphibia. With this chain
+of successive groups of Vertebrata, constructed anatomically, the
+palæontological facts agree most satisfactorily. Selachians and Ganoids
+existed in the Silurian times, Dipnoi in the Devonian, Amphibia in the
+Carboniferous, Reptilia in the Permian, Mammalia in the Trias. These
+are historical facts of first rank. They connote in the most convincing
+manner that remarkable ascending scale in the series of vertebrates
+for our knowledge of which we are indebted to the works of Cuvier and
+Blainville, Meckel, Johannes Mueller and Gegenbaur, Owen and Huxley.
+The historical succession of the classes and orders of the Vertebrata
+in the course of untold millions of years is definitely fixed by the
+concordance of those leading works, and this invaluable acquisition is
+much more important for the foundation of our human pedigree than would
+be a complete series of all possible skeletons of Primates.
+
+ [16] See note, p. 97.
+
+Greater and more frequent difficulties arise if we penetrate further
+into the most remote part of the human phylogeny, and attempt to derive
+the vertebrate stem from an older stem of invertebrate ancestors. None
+of those had a skeleton which could be petrified; and the same remark
+applies to the lowest classes of Vertebrata--to the Cyclostomes and
+the Acrania. Palæontology, therefore, can tell us nothing about them;
+and we are limited to the other two great documents of phylogeny--the
+results of comparative anatomy and ontogeny. The value of their
+evidence is, however, so great that every competent zoologist can
+perceive the most important features of the most remote portion of our
+phylogeny.
+
+Here the first place belongs to the invaluable results which modern
+comparative ontogeny has gained by the aid of the biogenetic law or
+the theory of recapitulation. The foundation-stones of vertebrate
+embryology had been laid by the works of Von Baer, Bischoff,[17] Remak,
+and Koelliker;[18] but the clearest light was thrown upon it by the
+famous discoveries of Kowalevsky[19] in 1866. He proved the identity
+of the first developmental stages of Amphioxus and the Ascidians, and
+thereby confirmed the divination of Goodsir, who had already announced
+the close affinity of Vertebrates and Tunicates. The acknowledgment of
+this affinity has proved of increasing importance, and has abolished
+the erroneous hypothesis that the Vertebrata may have arisen from
+Annelids or from other Articulata. Meanwhile, from 1860 to 1872, I
+myself had been studying the development of the Spongiæ, Medusæ,
+Siphonophora, and other Coelenterata. Their comparison led me to the
+statements embodied in the 'Gastræatheorie,' the first abstract of
+which was published in 1872 in my monograph of the Calcispongiæ.
+
+ [17] Wilhelm Bischoff of Munich: works on the history of the
+ development of the rabbit, dog, guinea-pig, roe-deer. 1840-1854.
+
+ [18] See note, p. 96.
+
+ [19] 'Ueber die Entwicklung der einfachen Ascidien,' Mém. Acad. St.
+ Petersbourg, vii. ser., tome x. (1866). Other papers in 'Archiv f.
+ Mikroskop. Anatomie,' vii. (1871); xiii. (1877).
+
+These ideas were carried on and expanded during the subsequent ten
+years by the help of many excellent embryologists--first of all by E.
+Ray Lankester and Francis Balfour. The most fruitful result of these
+widely extended researches was the conclusion that the first stages of
+embryonic development are essentially the same in all the different
+Metazoa, and that we may derive from these facts certain views on
+the common descent of all from one ancestral form. The unicellular
+egg[20] repeats the stage of our Protozoan ancestors; the Blastula
+is equivalent to an ancestral coenobium of Magosphæra or Volvox;
+the Gastrula is the hereditary repetition of the Gastræa, the common
+ancestor of all the Metazoa.
+
+ [20] See note, p. 115--Theory of cells.
+
+Man agrees in all these respects with the other vertebrates, and must
+have descended with them from the same common root.
+
+Particularly obscure is that part of our phylogeny which extends from
+the Gastræa to Amphioxus. The morphological importance of this last
+small creature had been perceived by Johannes Mueller, who in 1842
+gave the first accurate description of it. It would not, of course, be
+correct to proclaim the modern Amphioxus the common ancestor of all the
+vertebrates; but he must be regarded as closely related to them, and
+as the only survivor of the whole class of Acrania. If the Amphioxidæ
+had through some unfortunate accident become extinct, we should not
+have been able to gain anything like a positive glimpse at our most
+remote vertebrate ancestor. On the one hand, Amphioxus is closely
+connected with the early larva of the Cyclostomes, which are the
+oldest Craniota, and the pre-Silurian ancestors of the fishes. On the
+other hand, the ontogeny of Amphioxus is in harmony with that of the
+Ascidians, and if this agreement is not merely coincidental, but due to
+relationship, we are justified in reconstructing for both Ascidians
+and Amphioxus one common ancestral group of chordate animals, the
+hypothetical _Prochordonia_. The modern Copelata give us a remote idea
+of their structure. The curious Balanoglossus, the only living form of
+Enteropneusta, seems to connect these Prochordonia with the Nemertina
+and other Vermalia, which we unite in one large class--Frontonia.
+
+No doubt these pre-Cambrian Vermalia, and the common root of all
+Metazoa, the Gastræades, were connected during the Laurentian period
+by a long chain of intermediate forms, and probably among these
+were some older forms of Rotatoria and Turbellaria; but at present
+it is not possible to fill this wide gap with hypotheses that are
+satisfactory, and we have to admit that here indeed are many missing
+links in the older history of the Invertebrata. Still, every zoologist
+who is convinced of the truth of transformism, and is accustomed to
+phylogenetic speculations, knows very well that their results are most
+unequal, often incomplete.
+
+
+
+
+III.
+
+
+Let us now recapitulate the ancestral chain of man, as it is set forth
+in the accompanying diagram (p. 55), which represents our present
+knowledge of our descent. For simplicity's sake the many side-issues
+or branches which lead to groups not in the main line of our descent
+have been left out, or have been indicated merely. Many of the stages
+are of course hypothetical, arrived at by the study of comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny; but an example for each of them has been taken
+from those living or fossil creatures which seem to be their nearest
+representatives.
+
+1. The most remote ancestors of all living organisms were living beings
+of the simplest imaginable kind, organisms without organs, like
+the still existing _Monera_. Each consisted of a simple granule of
+protoplasm, a structureless mass of albuminous matter or plasson, like
+the recent Chromaceæ and Bacteriæ. The morphological value of these
+beings is not yet that of a cell, but that of a cytode, or cell without
+a nucleus. Cytoplasm and nucleus were still undifferentiated.
+
+I assume that the first Monera owe their existence to spontaneous
+creation out of so-called anorganic combinations, consisting of carbon,
+hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. An explanation of this hypothesis I
+have given in my 'Generelle Morphologie.'
+
+The Monera probably arose early in the Laurentian period. The oldest
+are the Phytomonera, with vegetable metabolism. They possessed the
+power (characteristic of plants) of forming albumin by synthesis from
+carbon, water, and ammonia. From some of these plasma-forming Monera
+arose the plasmophagous Zoomonera with animal metabolism, living
+directly upon the produce of their plasmodomous or plasma-forming
+sisters. This is the first instance of the great principle of division
+of labour.
+
+2. The second stage is that of the _simple and single cell_, a bit
+of protoplasm with a nucleus. Such unicellular organisms are still
+very common. The _Amoebæ_ are their simplest representatives. The
+morphological value of such beings is the same as that of the egg
+of any animal. The naked egg cells of the sponges creep about in an
+amoeboid fashion, scarcely distinguishable from Amoeba. The same
+remark applies to the egg-cell of man himself in its early stages
+before it is enclosed in a membrane. The first unicellular organisms
+arose from Monera through differentiation of the inner nucleus from the
+outer protoplasm.
+
+3. Repeated division of the unicellular organism produces the
+_Synamoebium_, or community of Amoebæ, provided the divisional
+products, or new generations of the original cell, do not scatter,
+but remain together. The existence of such a _Coenobium_, a number
+of equal and only loosely-connected cells, as a separate stage in the
+ancestral history of animals, is made highly probable by the fact that
+the eggs of all animals undergo after fertilization such a process of
+repeated self-division, or 'cleavage,' until the single egg cell is
+transformed into a heap of cells closely packed together, not unlike a
+mulberry (_morula_)--hence _morula_ stage in ontogeny.
+
+4. The morula of most animals further changes into a _Blastula_, a
+hollow ball filled with fluid, the wall being formed by a single layer
+of cells, the blastoderm or germinal layer. This modification is
+brought about by the action of the cells--they conveying nourishing
+fluid into the interior of the whole cell colony and thereby
+being themselves forced towards the surface. The Blastula of most
+Invertebrata, and even that of Amphioxus, is possessed of fine ciliæ,
+or hair-like processes, the vibrating motion of which causes the whole
+organism to rotate and advance in the water. Living representatives of
+such Blastæads, namely, globular gelatinous colonies of cells enclosing
+a cavity, are Volvox and Magosphæra.
+
+5. The Blastula of most animals assumes a new larval form called
+_Gastrula_, in which the essential characteristics are that a portion
+of the blastoderm by invagination converts the Blastula into a cup
+with double walls, enclosing a new cavity, the primitive gut. This
+invagination or bulging-in obliterates the original inner cavity of
+the Blastula. The outer layer of the Gastrula is the ectoderm, the
+inner the endoderm; both pass into each other at the blastoporus, or
+opening of the gut cavity. The Gastrula is a stage in the embryonic
+development of the various great groups of animals, and some such
+primitive form as ancestral to all Metazoa is thus indicated. This
+hypothetical _Gastræa_ is still very essentially represented by the
+lower Coelenterates--_e.g._, Olynthus, Hydra.
+
+6. The sixth stage--that of the _Platodes_, or flat-worms--is very
+hypothetical. They are bilateral gastræads, with a flattened oblong
+body, furnished with ciliæ, with a primitive nervous system, simple
+sensory and reproductive organs, but still without appendages, body
+cavity, vent, and blood-vessels. The nearest living representatives of
+such creatures are the acoelous Turbellarians--_e.g._, Convoluta, a
+free-swimming, ciliated creature.
+
+7. The next higher stage is represented by such low animals as the
+_Gastrotricha_--_e.g._, Chætonotus among the Rotatoria, which differ
+from the rhabdocoelous Turbellarians chiefly by the formation of
+a vent and the beginnings of a coelom, or cavity, between gut and
+body wall. The addition of a primitive vascular system and a pair of
+nephridia, or excretory organs, is first met with in the _Nemertines_.
+
+8. These, together with the _Enteropneusta_ (Balanoglossus), are
+comprised under the name of Frontonia, or Rhynchelminthes, and form the
+highest group of the Vermalia.
+
+The Enteropneusta especially fix our attention, because they alone,
+although essentially 'worms,' exhibit certain characteristics which
+make it possible to bridge over the gulf which still separates the
+Invertebrata from the vertebrate phylum. The anterior portion of the
+gut is transformed into a breathing apparatus--hence Gegenbaur's
+term of Enteropneusta, or Gut-breathers. Moreover, Balanoglossus and
+Cephalodiscus possess another modification of the gut--namely, a
+peculiar diverticulum, which, in the present state of our knowledge,
+may be looked upon as the forerunner of the chorda dorsalis.
+
+9. Stage of _Prochordonia_, as indicated by the larval form, called
+Chordula, which is common to the Tunicata and all the Vertebrata.
+These two groups possess three most important features: (_a_) A chorda
+dorsalis, a stiff rod lying in the long axis of the body, dorsally from
+the gut and below the central nervous system. This latter, for the
+first time in the animal kingdom, appears in the shape of a spinal
+cord. (_b_) The use of the anterior portion of the gut for respiratory
+purposes. (_c_) The larval development of the Tunicata is essentially
+the same as that of the Vertebrata in its early stages. Only the
+free-swimming Copelata or Appendicularia among the Tunicates retain
+most of these features. The others, which become sessile--namely, the
+Ascidiæ, or sea-squirts--degenerate and specialize away from the main
+line.
+
+10. Stage of the _Acrania_, represented by Amphioxus. The early
+development of this little marine creature agrees closely with
+that of the Tunicates; but one important feature is added to its
+organization--namely, metamerism, segmentally arranged mesoderm.
+Amphioxus still possesses neither skull nor vertebræ, neither ribs
+nor jaws, and no limbs. But it is a member of the Vertebrata if we
+define these as follows: Bilateral symmetrical animals with segmentally
+arranged mesoderm, with a chorda dorsalis between the tubular nervous
+system and the gut, and with respiratory organs which arise from the
+anterior portion of the gut. We do not assume that Amphioxus stands
+in the direct ancestral line; it is probably much specialized, partly
+degenerated, and represents a side-branch; but it is, nevertheless,
+the only creature, hitherto known, which satisfactorily connects the
+Vertebrata with their invertebrate ancestors. Many other efforts have
+been made to solve the mystery of the origin of the Vertebrata--all
+less satisfactory than the present suggestion, or even absolutely
+futile. This remark applies especially to the attempts to derive them
+from either Articulata or Echinoderms. The other great and highly
+developed phylum, the Mollusca, is quite out of the question. We have
+to go back to a level at which all these principal phyla meet, and
+there we find the Vermalia, the lower of which alone permit connection
+in an upward direction with the higher phyla.
+
+ ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE VERTEBRATA.
+
+ _Abridged from 'Systemat. Phylogenie,' § 15._
+
+ Names underlined refer to hypothetical groups.
+
+ _Mammalia_
+ _Aves_ |
+ | _Reptilia_ |
+ | | |
+ +----------------+ |
+ | |
+ +--------------+
+ |
+ _Proreptilia_
+ | _Amphibia_
+ _Pisces_ | |
+ | | +----------+
+ | | |
+ | | | _Dipnoi_
+ | _Stegocephali_ |
+ | | |
+ | +---------------+
+ | |
+ +---------------+
+ | _Cyclostomata_
+ _Proselachii_ |
+ | |
+ _Tunicata_ | +--------+
+ | | |
+ | *_Archicrania_*
+ | | _Acrania_
+ | | |
+ | *_Prospondylia_*------+
+ | |
+ +----------+ |
+ | |
+ *_Prochordonia_*
+
+
+11. Stage of _Cyclostomata_. This now small group of Lampreys and
+Hagfishes represents the lowest Craniota; and although much specialized
+as a side-branch of the main-stem from which the other Craniota have
+sprung, they give us an idea of what the direct ancestors of the latter
+must have been like:--still without visceral arches, without jaws and
+without paired limbs; with a persistent pronephros; the ear with one
+semicircular canal only; mouth suctorial; cranium very primitive;
+and the metamerism of the vertebral column indicated only by little
+blocks of cartilage in the perichordal sheath. Such creatures must
+have existed at least as early as the Lower Silurian epoch; but until
+1890 fossil Cyclostomes were unknown. Their life in the mud, or as
+endoparasites of fishes, coupled with their soft structure, makes them
+very unfit for preservation. This gives all the greater importance to
+Traquair's discovery, in 1890, of many little creatures, called by him
+_Palæospondylus gunni_, in the Old Red Sandstone of Caithness, which
+seem to be very closely allied to Cyclostomata.
+
+12. The _Elasmobranchi_ (sharks and skates), with their immediate
+forerunners, the Acanthodi of the Devonian and Carboniferous age,
+are the first typical fishes. That they existed as far back as the
+Silurian age is proved by many enamelled spines of the dermal armour,
+chiefly from the dorsal fins. This higher stage is characterized by the
+possession of typical jaws, by visceral or gill-bearing arches, and by
+two pairs of limbs. None of the Elasmobranchs, fossil or recent, stands
+in the direct ancestral line; but they are the lowest Gnathostomata,
+jaw-and-limb-possessing creatures, known.
+
+13. Closely connected with the Elasmobranchs in a wider sense are the
+_Crossopterygii_, which begin in the Devonian age as a large group, but
+have left only two survivals, the African Polypterus and Calamoichthys.
+They are possessed of dermal bones and other ossifications, and are
+characterized by their lobate paired fins, which have a thick axis
+beset with biserial fin rays. Their gill-clefts are covered by an
+operculum, and they have a well-developed air-bladder. Whilst they
+are in many respects more highly developed than the Elasmobranchs,
+and are intimately connected with the typical Ganoids and other
+bony fishes (all of which form a great, manifold side-branch of the
+general vertebrate stem), they stand in many other respects (notably,
+the structure of the paired fins, the vertebral column, and the
+air-bladder) nearer the main-stem of our own ancestral line.
+
+14. This is shown by their intimate relation to the _Dipnoi_, which
+are still represented by the Australian, African, and South American
+mud-fishes: Ceratodus, Protopterus, and Lepidosiren. The genus
+Ceratodus existed in the Upper Trias, whence various other unmistakably
+dipnoous forms lead down through the Carboniferous (_e.g._, Ctenodus)
+to the Devonian strata--_e.g._, Dipterus. They are characterized as
+follows: The paired fins still retain the archipterygial form (namely,
+one axis with biserial rays); the heart is already trilocular, and
+receives blood which is mixed arterial and venous, owing to the gills
+being retained, while the air-bladder has been modified into a lung. In
+fact, the generalized Dipnoi form the actual link between fishes and
+_Amphibia_.
+
+15. _Amphibia._ The earliest amphibian fossils occur in
+the Carboniferous strata. They alone--the Stegocephali or
+Phractamphibia--stand in the ancestral line, while the Lissamphibia, to
+which all the recent forms belong, are side-branches. The Stegocephali
+are the earliest Tetrapoda, the archipterygial paired fins having been
+transformed into the pentadactyle fore and hind limbs, which are so
+characteristic of all the higher Vertebrata. The cranium is roofed
+over by dermal bones, of which, besides others, supra-occipitals,
+supra-orbitals, and supra-temporals are always present. The lowest
+members (Branchiosauri) still retained gills besides the lungs, while
+others (Microsauri) have lost the gills. Be it remembered that all
+the recent Amphibia still undergo the same metamorphosis during their
+ontogenetic development.
+
+In the very important Temnospondyli, a subgroup of the
+Stegocephali--_e.g._, Trimerorhachis of the Lower Red Sandstone or
+Lower Permian--the component cartilaginous or bony units which compose
+the vertebræ still remained in a separate, unfused state, showing at
+the same time an arrangement whence has arisen that which is typical
+of the Amniota. The same applies to the limbs and their girdles. In
+fact, the Stegocephali, taken as a whole, lead imperceptibly to the
+_Proreptilia_.
+
+16. _Proreptilia_ are represented by the Permian genera Eryops and
+Cricotus. Until quite recently these and many other fossils from
+the Carboniferous strata were looked upon as Amphibia, while many
+undoubted fossil Amphibia were mistaken for reptiles, as indicated by
+the frequent termination '-saurus' in their names.
+
+The nearest living representative of these extinct Proreptilia is
+the New Zealand reptile Hatteria, or Sphenodon, close relations
+of which are known from the Upper Trias; while others--_e.g._,
+Palæohatteria--have been discovered in the Permian. Anyhow, Sphenodon
+is the reptile which stands nearest to the main stem of our ancestry.
+
+The most important characteristics of the Reptilia, which mark a higher
+stage or level, are (1) The entire suppression of the gills--although
+during the embryonic development the gill-clefts still appear in all
+reptiles, birds, and mammals; (2) The development of an amnion and an
+allantois, both for the embryonic life only, but so characteristic
+that all these animals are comprised under the name of Amniota;
+(3) The articulation of the skull with the first neck vertebræ by
+well-developed condyles, either single (really triple) or double (such
+a condylar arrangement begins with the Amphibia, but only the two
+lateral condyles are developed, while the middle portion, belonging to
+the basi-occipital element, remains rudimentary[21]); (4) The formation
+of centra, or bodies of the vertebræ, mainly by a ventral pair of the
+original quadruple constituents, or arcualia.
+
+ [21] Similar conditions seem to have prevailed among the Proreptilia;
+ but in those of their descendants which have specialized into Reptiles
+ and Birds the basi-occipital element becomes more and more predominant
+ in that formation which ultimately leads to the apparently single
+ condyle. Hence it is misleading to divide the Tetrapoda into the two
+ main groups of Amphi-and Mono-condylia, and therefrom to conclude that
+ the two-condyled Mammalia are more closely related to the likewise
+ amphicondylous Amphibia than to the so-called monocondylous Reptiles.
+
+17. Between the Proreptilia and the Mammalia, which latter occur in
+the Upper Triassic epoch, we have necessarily to intercalate a group
+of very low reptiles, which are still so generalized that their
+descendants could branch off either into the Reptilia proper or into
+the Mammalia. The changes concerned chiefly the brain and the heart;
+of the skeleton, the skull and the pelvis; and, of the tegumentary
+structures, the formation of a hairy covering. Many such creatures
+existed in the Triassic epoch--namely, the _Theromorpha_--some of which
+indeed possess so many characteristics which otherwise occur in the
+Mammalia only, that these creatures have been termed _Sauro-Mammalia_.
+However, it has to be emphasized that none of the Theromorpha hitherto
+discovered fulfils all the requirements which would entitle them to
+this important linking position. They only give us an approximate idea
+of what this link was like.
+
+18. Stage of the _Promammalia_, or _Prototheria_. The only surviving
+members are the famous duck-bill, Ornithorhynchus, and the spiny
+ant-eaters, Echidna and Proechidna, of the Australian region. These
+few genera, however, differ so much from one another in various
+important respects that they cannot but be remnants of an originally
+much larger group. Indeed, many fossils from the Upper Triassic and
+from the Jurassic strata have without much doubt to be referred to the
+Prototheria. The Prototheria are typical mammals, because they possess
+the following characteristics: The heart is completely quadrilocular;
+the blood is warm, and its red corpuscles have, owing to the loss
+of their nucleus, been modified from biconvex into biconcave discs;
+they have a hairy coat and sweat glands, and two occipital condyles;
+the ilio-sacral connection is preacetabular; the ankle-joint is
+cruro-tarsal; the quadrate bone of the Reptilia has ceased to carry the
+under jaw, which now articulates directly with the squamosal portion
+of the skull. Their low position is shown by the retention of the
+following reptilian features: Complete coracoid bones and a T-shaped
+interclavicle; a cloaca, or common chamber for the passage of the
+fæces, the genital and the urinary products; they are still oviparous;
+the embryo develops without a chorion, and is therefore not nourished
+through a placenta. Even the milk glands, which are absolutely
+peculiar to the Mammalia, are still in a very primitive stage, and do
+not yet produce milk proper; and there is only a temporary shallow
+marsupium.
+
+19. Stage of _Metatheria_, or _Marsupialia_, are direct descendants of
+Prototheria; but they show higher development by the reduction of the
+coracoid bones and the interclavicle. The original cloaca is divided
+into a rectal chamber and a uro-genital sinus, completely separated,
+at least in the males; they are viviparous; the young are received
+into a permanent marsupium, in the walls of which are formed typical
+milk glands and nipples, but the embryo is still devoid of a placenta,
+although some recent marsupials show indications of such an organ. The
+corpus callosum in the brain is still very weak.
+
+Most of the marsupials are extinct. They occur from the Upper Trias
+onwards, and had in the Jurassic epoch attained a wide distribution
+both in Europe and in America. Since the Tertiary epoch they have
+been restricted to America and to the Australian region, and are now
+represented by about 150 species.
+
+20. Stage of _Prochoriata_, or early _Placentalia_: a further
+development of the Metatheria by the development of a placenta, loss
+of the marsupium and the marsupial bones, complete division by the
+perineum of the anal and uro-genital chambers, stronger development of
+the corpus callosum, or chief commissure of the two hemispheres of the
+brain.
+
+Placentalia must have come into existence during the Cretaceous
+epoch. Up to that time all the Mammalia seem to have belonged to
+either Prototheria or to Metatheria; but in the early Eocene we can
+distinguish the main groups of Placentalia--namely, (1) Trogontia, now
+represented by the rodents; (2) Edentata, or sloths, armadilloes, etc.;
+(3) Carnassia, or Insectivora and Carnivora; (4) Chiroptera, or bats;
+(5) Cetomorpha, or whales and dugongs; (6) Ungulata; (7) Primates.
+Of these groups, the first and second, third and fourth, fifth and
+sixth, can perhaps, to judge from palæontological evidence, be combined
+into three greater groups, as indicated by the fossil Esthonychida,
+Ictopsida, and Condylarthra, in addition to the ancestral Primates,
+or Lemuravida, as the fourth large branch of the ancestral-tree where
+this has reached the placental level. Among none of the first three
+branches can we look for the ancestors of the Primates. The Lemuravida,
+therefore, represent a branch equivalent to the three other branches.
+
+21. Stage of _Lemures_, or _Prosimiæ_, comprising the older members of
+the Primates, consequently approaching most nearly to the Lemuravida.
+The limbs are modified into pentadactyle hands and feet of the arboreal
+type, and are protected by nails. The dentition is of the frugivorous
+or omnivorous type, with an originally complete series of teeth, with
+milk teeth and with permanent. The orbit is surrounded by a complete
+bony ring, posteriorly by a fronto-jugal arch, but still widely
+communicating with the temporal fossa. The placenta is diffuse and
+non-deciduous.
+
+ ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE MAMMALIA.
+
+ _'Systematische Phylogenie,' § 386._
+
+ _Perissodactyla_ _Homo_ _Carnivora_
+ | (_Litopterna_) | | _Pinnipedia_
+ | | | | |
+ +-------+ _Anthropoidae_ +------+
+ _Artiodactyla_ | | |
+ | | | _Carnassia_
+ +----------+ _Catarhinæ_ |
+ | | _Chiroptera_ |
+ _Proboscidea_ | | | _Insectivora_ |
+ | | _Platyrhinæ_ | | |
+ (_Amblypoda_) | | | | +-------+
+ | | | | | | _Rodentia_
+ +-------+ | _Simiæ_ +-------+ |
+ | | | | (_Tillodontia_)
+ +--+ | | |
+ _Cetacea_ | | | _Trogontia_
+ | _Sirenia_ | _Lemures_ _*Ictopsales*_ | _Edentata_
+ | | | | | | |
+ _Cetomorpha_ | _Hyracoidea_ | | _*Esthonychales*_
+ | | | | | |
+ +---_?_---+------+ | | |
+ | _*Lemuravidæ*_ | |
+ _*Condylarthrales*_ | +-------+ |
+ | | | |
+ +--------Eutheria s. Placentalia------------------+
+ |
+ | _Marsupialia polyprotodontia_
+ _Marsupialia diprotodontia_ | |
+ | | |
+ +-------------Metatheria--------------+
+ |
+ | _Monotremata_
+ | | (_Allotheria_)
+ | | |
+ | +-----------------+
+ | |
+ Prototheria-----+
+ |
+ |
+ _*Hypotheria s.*_ _*Promammalia*_
+
+ _Names in brackets indicate extinct groups.
+ Names *underlined* indicate hypothetical groups or combinations._
+
+22. Stage of _Simiæ_. Orbit completely separated from the temporal
+fossa by an inward extension of the frontal and malar bones meeting the
+alisphenoid. Placenta consolidated into a disc, and with a maternal
+deciduous portion. Mammæ pectoral only. The dental formula is 2.1.3.3.
+All the fingers and toes are protected by flat nails. The tail is long.
+The American prehensile-tailed monkeys are a lower side-branch.
+
+23. Stage of _Catarrhinæ Cercopithecidæ_. The dental formula is
+2.1.2.3, owing to the loss of one pair of premolars in each jaw.
+The frontal and alisphenoid bones are in contact, separating the
+parietal from the malar bone; this feature is correlated with the
+enlarged brain. The internarial septum is narrow, and the nostrils
+look forwards and downwards instead of sidewards--hence the term
+'Catarrhinæ.' The external auditory meatus is long and bony. The tail
+is long, with the exception of _Macacus inuus_. The body is covered
+with a thick coat of furry hair. Catarrhine monkeys have existed, we
+know with certainty, since the Miocene.
+
+24. Stage of _Catarrhinæ Anthropoidæ_, or _Apes_. Now represented by
+the large apes--namely, the Hylobates or gibbon of South-Eastern Asia,
+_Simia satyrus_, the orang-utan of Sumatra and Borneo, _Troglodytes
+gorilla_, _T. niger_ and _T. calvus_, the gorilla and the chimpanzees
+from Western Equatorial Africa. Of fossils are to be mentioned
+Pliopithecus and Dryopithecus from European Miocene, and _Troglodytes
+sivalensis_ from the Pliocene of the Punjaub. The tail is reduced
+to a few caudal vertebræ, which are transformed into a coccyx, not
+visible externally; but in the embryos of apes and man the tail is
+still a conspicuous feature. The walk is semierect; in adaptation
+to the prevailing arboreal life, the arms are longer than the legs.
+The hair of the body is considerably more scanty than in the tailed
+monkeys. _Troglodytes calvus_, a species or variety of chimpanzee, is
+bald-headed. None of the recent genera of apes can lay claim to a place
+in the ancestry of mankind.
+
+25. Stage of _Pithecanthropi_. Hitherto the only known representative
+is _Pithecanthropus erectus_, from the Upper Pliocene of Java. In
+adaptation to a more erect gait, the legs have become stronger and the
+hind-hand has been turned into a flat-soled walking 'foot.' The brain
+is considerably enlarged. Presumably it is still devoid of so-called
+articulate speech; this is indicated by the fact that children have
+to learn the language of their parents, and by the circumstance that
+comparative philology declares it impossible to reduce the chief human
+languages to anything like one common origin.
+
+26. _Man._ Known with certainty to have existed as an implement-using
+creature in the last Glacial epoch. His probable origin cannot,
+therefore, have been later than the beginning of the Plistocene. The
+place of origin was probably somewhere in Southern Asia.
+
+Whilst we have to admit that there are great defects in the older
+(invertebrate) portion of our pedigree, we have all the more reason to
+be satisfied with the positive results of our investigation of the more
+recent (vertebrate) part of it. All modern researches have confirmed
+the views of Lamarck, Darwin, and Huxley, and they allow of no doubt
+that the nearest vertebrate ancestors of mankind were a series of
+Tertiary Primates.
+
+Particularly valuable are the admirable attempts of the two zoologists,
+Paul and Fritz Sarasin,[22] to throw light upon the human phylogeny by
+painstaking comparison of all the skeletal parts of man with those of
+the anthropoid apes. They have shown that among the lower races of man
+the primitive Veddahs of Ceylon approach the apes most nearly, and that
+among the latter the chimpanzee stands nearest to man.
+
+ [22] 'Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf Ceylon,' vols.
+ 4 and 5. (With an atlas of 84 plates; 1893.)
+
+The direct descent of man from some extinct ape-like form is now beyond
+doubt, and admits of being traced much more clearly than the origin
+of many another mammalian order. The pedigrees of the Elephants, the
+Sirenia, the Cetacea, and, above all, of the Edentata, for example,
+are much more obscure and difficult to explain. In many parts of their
+organization--for example, in the number and structure of his five
+digits and toes--man and monkeys have remained much more primitive than
+most of the Ungulata.
+
+The immense significance of this positive knowledge of the origin of
+man from some Primate does not require to be enforced. Its bearing
+upon the highest questions of philosophy cannot be exaggerated. Among
+modern philosophers no one has perceived this more deeply than Herbert
+Spencer.[23] He is one of those older thinkers who before Darwin were
+convinced that the theory of development is the only way to solve
+the 'enigma of the world.' Spencer is also the champion of those
+evolutionists who lay the greatest weight upon _progressive heredity_,
+or the much combated _heredity of acquired characters_. From the first
+he has severely attacked and criticised the theories of Weismann, who
+denies this most important factor of phylogeny, and would explain
+the whole of transformism by the 'all-sufficiency of selection.' In
+England the theories of Weismann were received with enthusiastic
+acclamation, much more so than on the Continent, and they were called
+'Neo-Darwinism,' in opposition to the older conception of Evolution,
+or 'Neo-Lamarckism.' Neither of those expressions is correct. Darwin
+himself was convinced of the fundamental importance of progressive
+heredity quite as much as his great predecessor Lamarck; as were also
+Huxley and Spencer.
+
+ [23] 'Principles of Biology': 'The Factors of Organic Evolution'; 'The
+ Inadequacy of Natural Selection.'
+
+Three times I had the good fortune to visit Darwin at Down, and on each
+occasion we discussed this fundamental question in complete harmony.
+I agree with Spencer in the conviction that progressive heredity is
+an indispensable factor in every true monistic theory of Evolution,
+and that it is one of its most important elements. If one denies with
+Weismann the heredity of acquired characters, then it becomes necessary
+to have recourse to purely mystical qualities of germ-plasm. I am of
+the opinion of Spencer, that in that case it would be better to accept
+a mysterious creation of all the various species as described in the
+Mosaic account.
+
+If we look at the results of modern anthropogeny from the highest point
+of view, and compare all its empirical arguments, we are justified in
+affirming that _the descent of man from an extinct Tertiary series of
+Primates is not a vague hypothesis, but an historical fact_.
+
+Of course, this fact cannot be proved _exactly_. We cannot explain all
+the innumerable physical and chemical processes, all the physiological
+mutations, which have led during untold millions of years from the
+simplest Monera and from the unicellular Protista upwards to the
+chimpanzee and to man. But the same consideration applies to all
+historical facts. We all believe that Aristotle, Cæsar, and King Alfred
+did live; but it is impossible to give a proof within the meaning of
+modern exact science. We believe firmly in the former existence of
+these and other great heroes of thought, because we know well the works
+they have left behind them, and we see their effects in the history
+of human culture. These indirect arguments do not furnish stronger
+evidence than those of our history as vertebrates. We know of many
+Jurassic mammals only a single bone, the under jaw. We all believe that
+these mammals possessed also an upper jaw, a skull, and other bones.
+But the so-called 'exact school,' which regards the transformation of
+species as a hypothesis not proven, must suppose that the mandibula was
+the only bone in the body of these curious animals.
+
+Looking forward to the twentieth century, I am convinced that it will
+universally accept our theory of descent, and that future science
+will regard it as the greatest advance made in our time. I have no
+doubt that the influence of the study of anthropogeny upon all other
+branches of science will be fruitful and auspicious. The work done in
+the present century by Lamarck and Darwin will in all future times be
+considered one of the greatest conquests made by thinking man.
+
+ EVOLUTIONARY STAGES OF THE PRINCIPAL GROUPS OF VERTEBRATA.[24]
+
+ STAGES OF THE CLASSES. STAGES OF THE HEART.
+ PAIRED LIMBS.
+
+ { 1. _Acrania._ I. _Leptocardia._
+ I. _Adactylia_ { Cold-blooded; heart
+ s. _Impinnata_. { with one chamber;
+ Without jaws { without lungs.
+ and limbs. {
+ { 2. _Cyclostomata._ } II. _Ichthyocardia._
+ } Cold-blooded; heart
+ } two-chambered, with
+ } one atrium and one
+ } ventricle; heart
+ } containing venous
+ } blood only; without
+ II. _Polydactylia_ { 3. _Pisces._ } lungs.
+ s. _Pinnata_. {
+ With two { } III. _Amphicardia._
+ pairs of fins. { 4. _Dipnoi._ } Cold-blooded; heart
+ } with three complete
+ } chambers, namely, with
+ } two atria and one
+ } ventricle, or (Reptilia)
+ { 5. _Amphibia._ } two ventricles with still
+ { } incomplete septum; heart
+ { } containing mixed venous
+ { } and arterialized
+ III. _Pentadactylia_ { 6. _Reptilia._ } blood; with lungs.
+ s. _Tetrapoda_. {
+ With two pairs { { IV. _Thermocardia._
+ of pentadactyle { { Warm-blooded; heart
+ limbs (unless { 7. _Aves._ { with four complete
+ they have { { chambers, namely, two
+ been lost by { { auricles and two
+ reduction). { { ventricles; right half
+ { { of the heart with venous,
+ { { left half with
+ { { arterialized, blood; with
+ { 8. _Mammalia._ { lungs.
+
+
+ [24] Abridged from Haeckel's 'Systematische Phylogenie der
+ Vertebraten,' § 14.
+
+
+
+
+ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES
+
+
+JEAN BAPTISTE DE MONET, CHEVALIER DE LAMARCK, was born on
+August 1, 1744, in Picardy, where his father owned land. Originally
+educated for the Church, he soon enlisted, and distinguished himself
+in active service. Owing to an accident affecting his health, the
+young Lieutenant gave up the military career, and, without means,
+studied medicine and natural sciences at Paris. In 1778 appeared his
+'Flore française.' In 1793 he was appointed to a Chair of Zoology at
+the newly-formed Musée d'Histoire Naturelle. He had the misfortune to
+become gradually blind, and the last years of his life were spent amid
+straitened circumstances. He died in 1829.
+
+In 1794 Lamarck divided the whole animal kingdom into vertebrate and
+invertebrate animals, and founded successively the groups of Crustacea,
+Arachnida, Annelida, and Radiata. Between 1816 and 1822 he published
+his celebrated 'Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres.'
+
+His most famous work is the 'Philosophie zoologique,' 1809.
+
+Assuming the spontaneous origin of life, he propounded the doctrine
+that all animals and plants have arisen from low forms through
+incessant modifications and changes. In this respect he was in absolute
+opposition to Cuvier, who upheld the immutability of species, and did
+his best by absolute silence to suppress the spread of the new doctrine.
+
+Lamarck has explained his views of transformism chiefly in the seventh
+chapter of the first volume of his 'Philosophie zoologique.'
+
+Organisms strive to accommodate or adapt themselves to new
+circumstances, or to satisfy new requirements--_e.g._, climate, mode
+of procuring food, escape from enemies. The continued function of
+parts of an organism changes the old and produces new organs. The
+acquirements are inherited by the offspring, and thus are produced the
+more complicated from simpler organisms. Continued disuse brings about
+degeneration and ultimate loss of an organ.
+
+Lamarck consequently sees in the adaptability, or power of adaptation,
+which he assumes for all living matter the ultimate cause of variation;
+and, as he was certainly the first to point out that acquired
+characters are inherited by the progeny, he has given a working
+explanation of Evolution.
+
+But his doctrine did not spread--partly because he was misunderstood.
+His theory, that a new want, by making itself felt, exacts from the
+animal new exertions, perhaps from parts hitherto not used, until the
+want is satisfied--this way of putting it sounds too teleological
+to explain the yearned-for change in a mechanical or natural way.
+Moreover, many of his examples lacked the exact basis of experiment
+and observation necessary for their acceptance. Witness that of the
+neck of the giraffe,--a never-failing source of ridicule to men who
+cannot see the deeper purpose underlying the well-meant attempt at
+an explanation, which failed from want of complete knowledge of the
+intricate circumstances.
+
+However, the theory of transformism was, so to speak, in the air;
+and various authors have written on the subject, filling the gap
+between Lamarck and Darwin, especially Goethe, Treviranus, Leopold
+von Buch, and Herbert Spencer. But it is Darwin's immortal merit to
+have opened our eyes by his theory of natural selection, which is, at
+least, the first attempt to explain some of the causes and incidents
+of organic Evolution in a natural mechanical way. Moreover, he was
+the first clearly to express the fundamental principles of the theory
+of descent, to elaborate what had been at best a general sketch of an
+ill-defined problem, and to enter into detail, supported by a host
+of painstaking observations, the making of which had taken him half a
+lifetime. Darwin, without going further than cursorily into the causes
+of variation, argued as follows: We know that variations do occur
+in every kind of living creatures. Some of these variations lead to
+something, while others do not. An enormously greater number of animals
+and plants are born than reach maturity and can in their turn continue
+the race. What is the regulating factor? His answer is, The struggle
+for existence--in other words, the weeding out of the less fit, or
+rather of the owners of those variations which are not so well adapted
+to their surroundings.
+
+For 'adapted' we had better read 'adaptable,' because a variation which
+does not answer, which cannot be made use of, or, still more notably,
+is a hindrance or disadvantage, does not become an adapted feature.
+There is often a confusion between adaptation as an accomplished
+fact, a feature, or resultant condition, and adaptation as the mode
+of fitting the organism to, or making the best of, the prevailing
+surroundings or circumstances.
+
+ÉTIENNE GEOFFROY SAINT-HILAIRE was born in 1772 at Étampes,
+Seine-et-Oise. He was originally brought up for the Church; but when
+already ordained he attended lectures on natural science and medicine
+in Paris. He managed to get the place of assistant in the Musée
+d'Histoire Naturelle; he became Professor of Zoology in 1793, and took
+the opportunity of encouraging young Cuvier. Later he became Professor
+of Zoology of the Faculté des Sciences, and in 1818 he published his
+remarkable 'Philosophie anatomique.' He died in 1844.
+
+He had conceived the 'unity of organic composition,' meaning that there
+is only one plan of construction,--the same principle, but varied in
+its accessory parts. In 1830, when Geoffroy proceeded to apply to the
+Invertebrata his views as to the uniformity of animal composition,
+he found a vigorous opponent in Cuvier. Geoffroy, like Goethe, held
+that there is in Nature a law of compensation, or balancing of growth,
+so that if one organ take on an excess of development, it is at the
+expense of another part; and he maintained that, since Nature takes no
+sudden leaps, even organs which are superfluous in any given species,
+if they have played an important part in other species of the same
+family, are retained as rudiments, which testify to the permanence
+of the general plan of creation. It was his conviction that, owing
+to the conditions of life, the same forms had _not_ been perpetuated
+since the origin of all things, although it was not his belief that
+existing species were becoming modified. Cuvier, on the other hand,
+maintained the absolute invariability of species, which, he declared,
+had been created with regard to the circumstances in which they were
+placed, each organ contrived with a view to the function it had
+to fulfil,--thus putting the effect for the cause ('Encyclopædia
+Britannica,' 9th edition, vol. xxi., p. 171).
+
+GEORGE CUVIER was born in 1769 at Montbéliard, in the department of
+Doubs, which at that time belonged to Württemberg. He was educated at
+Stuttgart, and studied political economy. While acting as private tutor
+to a French family in France he followed his favourite pursuit, the
+study of natural sciences. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire heard of him, and
+appointed him assistant in the department of comparative anatomy in the
+Musée d'Histoire Naturelle. In 1799 he was elected Professor of Natural
+History at the Collège de France, and soon after he became Perpetual
+Secretary of the Institut National. In 1831, a year before his death,
+Louis Philippe raised him to the rank of a peer of France.
+
+Cuvier was the first to indicate the true principle upon which the
+natural classification of animals should be based--namely, their
+structure. It is the study of the anatomy of the creatures and their
+comparison which affords the only sound basis of a classification.
+The work which had the greatest influence upon the scientific public
+is his 'Règne animal distribué d'après son Organisation,' 1817. The
+system which he propounded in this book gradually came to have almost
+world-wide fame, and, in spite of its many obvious deficiencies, still
+lingers in some of our most recent text-books.
+
+A standard work is his 'Leçons d'Anatomie comparée,' and, in truth, he
+is the founder of that kind of comparative anatomy which was brought
+to such a high state by his pupil, the late Sir Richard Owen. Cuvier
+discovered the law of 'correlation of growth,' and was the first to
+apply this law to the reconstruction of animals from fragments: see his
+monumental work entitled 'Recherches sur les Ossemens fossiles,' 1812.
+
+Cuvier, however, as a strict matter-of-fact man, was incapable of
+appreciating the speculative conclusions which were drawn by his
+contemporaries Saint-Hilaire and Lamarck. On the contrary, he firmly
+stuck to the doctrine of the immutability of species; and, in order to
+account for the existence of animals whose kind exists no longer, he
+invented the famous doctrine of successive cataclysms.
+
+KARL ERNST VON BAER was born in 1792 in Esthonia, studied at Dorpat
+and then at Würzburg, where Döllinger introduced him to comparative
+anatomy. For a few years he was a _Privat-docent_ at Berlin; then he
+went to Königsberg as Professor of Zoology and Embryology. In 1834
+he became an Academician at St. Petersburg, where for many years he
+was occupied with the most varied studies, chiefly geographical and
+ethnological. The last years of his long, active life he spent in
+contemplative retirement on his paternal estate, and he died at Dorpat
+in 1876.
+
+While still at Würzburg he induced his friend Pander, a young man
+of means, to study the development of the chick; and Pander was the
+first to start the theory of the germinal layers from which all the
+organs arise. Baer, however, continued these researches in Königsberg,
+and after nine years' labour produced his epoch-making work, 'Ueber
+Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion,'
+Königsberg, 1828. Nine years later he completed the second volume.
+He established upon a firm basis the theory of the germinal layers,
+and by further 'reflexions' arrived at the elucidation of some of the
+most fundamental laws of biology. For example, in the first volume
+he made the following prophetic statement: 'Perhaps all animals are
+alike, and nothing but hollow globes at their earliest developmental
+beginning. The farther back we trace their development, the more
+resemblance we find in the most different creatures. And this leads to
+the question whether at the beginning of their development all animals
+are essentially alike, and referable to one common ancestral form.
+Considering that the "germ" (which at a certain stage appears in the
+shape of a hollow globe or bag) is the undeveloped animal itself, we
+are not without reason for assuming that the common fundamental form is
+that of a simple vesicle, from which every animal is evolved, not only
+theoretically, but historically.'
+
+This statement is all the more wonderful when we consider that the
+cells, the all-composing individual units, were not discovered until
+ten years later.
+
+In 1829 Baer discovered the human egg, and later the chorda dorsalis.
+In an address delivered in 1834, entitled 'The Most Universal Law
+of Nature in all Development,' he explained that only from a most
+superficial point of view can the various species be looked upon as
+permanent and immutable types; that, on the contrary, they can be
+nothing but passing stages, or series of stages, of development, which
+have been evolved by transformation out of common ancestral forms.
+
+JOHANNES MUELLER, born at Coblenz in 1801, established himself
+as _Privat-docent_ at Bonn, where in 1830 he became Professor of
+Physiology. In 1833 he accepted the Chair of Anatomy and Physiology at
+Berlin, where he died in 1858.
+
+He was one of the most distinguished physiologists and comparative
+anatomists. By summarizing the labours and discoveries already made in
+the field of physiology, by reducing them to order, and abstracting the
+general principles, he became the founder of modern physiology. But
+he was scarcely less distinguished by his researches in comparative
+anatomy. His 'Vergleichende Anatomie der Myxinoiden,' in _Abhandlungen
+der Berliner Akademie_, 1835-45, and 'Ueber die Grenzen der Ganoiden'
+(_ibid._, 1846), are standard works of lasting value.
+
+Mueller exercised a stimulative influence as a teacher. Many well-known
+men--such as Helmholtz, Gegenbaur, Bruecke the physiologist, Guenther
+the zoologist, Virchow the pathologist, Koelliker and Haeckel--have
+been his pupils.
+
+RUDOLPH VIRCHOW was born in 1821 at Schievelbein, a small
+town in Eastern Pomerania. He studied medicine in Berlin as a pupil
+of Johannes Mueller, and went in 1849 to Würzburg, where, under the
+influence of Koelliker, and Leydig the pathologist, he laid the
+foundation of an entirely new branch of medical science--that of
+'cellular pathology.' Since 1856 he has filled the principal Chair of
+Pathology at Berlin. In 1892 he received the Copley medal of the Royal
+Society.
+
+'His contributions to the study of morbid anatomy have thrown light
+upon the diseases of every part of the body; but the broad and
+philosophical view he has taken of the processes of pathology has
+done more than his most brilliant observations to make the science of
+disease.
+
+'In pathology, strictly so called, his two great achievements--the
+detection of the cellular activity which lies at the bottom of
+all morbid as well as normal physiological processes, and the
+classification of the important group of new growths on a natural
+histological basis--have each of them not only made an epoch in
+medicine, but have also been the occasion of fresh extension of science
+by other labourers' (Proc. Royal Soc., 1892).
+
+Virchow has not confined himself to medicine. He takes the keenest
+interest in anthropology and ethnology, on which subjects he has
+contributed many papers. Together with his colleagues Helmholtz the
+physicist, and Du Bois Reymond the physiologist, he has taken a leading
+place in the spreading of natural science; but, unfortunately, he
+did not take to the doctrine of Evolution, and for the last thirty
+years has been its declared antagonist, rarely missing an opportunity
+of denouncing everything but descriptive anatomy and zoology as the
+unsound speculations of dreamers. This has on more than one occasion
+brought him into sharp conflict with Haeckel. His activity is
+astonishing, especially if it be remembered that Virchow has for many
+years been one of the most conspicuous leaders of the Progressists and
+Radicals in the German Parliament and Berlin town-council.
+
+EDWARD DRINKER COPE was born at Philadelphia, Pa. After studying at
+several Continental Universities, especially at Heidelberg, he became
+first Professor of Natural Science at Haverford College, and later
+Professor of Geology and Mineralogy. He died at an early age in 1897.
+As a member of various geological expeditions and other surveys, he
+explored chiefly Kansas, Wyoming, and Colorado; and he published many
+most suggestive papers on the fossil vertebrate fauna of North America,
+and on classification especially of Amphibia and Reptiles.
+
+Among works of a more general philosophical scope may be mentioned 'The
+Origin of the Fittest,' 1887, and his latest work, 'The Primary Factors
+of Organic Evolution,' 1896.
+
+ALBERT VON KOELLIKER, born in 1817, became Professor of Anatomy at
+Würzburg. His earlier studies and discoveries contributed considerably
+to the systematic development of the cell theory. In 1844 he observed
+the division and further multiplication of the original egg cell. Next
+year he showed the continuity between nerve cells and nerve fibres in
+the Vertebrata; later, that the non-striped or smooth muscular tissue
+is composed of cellular elements. He demonstrated that the Gregarinæ
+are unicellular creatures. In 1852 he went with his younger friend
+Gegenbaur to Messina, where he studied especially the development
+of the Cephalopoda (cuttlefishes and allies); and he produced a
+magnificent work on Alcyonaria, Medusæ, and other allied forms. He
+elucidated the development of the vertebral column, especially with
+reference to the notochord.
+
+In 1848 he founded, together with Th. von Siebold, the famous
+_Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie_.
+
+A standard work on mammalian embryology is his 'Entwicklungsgeschichte
+des Menschen und der höheren Thiere,' a text-book of which the second
+edition appeared in 1879.
+
+At the anniversary meeting of 1897 he received the Copley medal, the
+highest honour which the Royal Society can bestow.
+
+CARL GEGENBAUR was born on August 21, 1826, in Bavaria. He studied
+medicine and kindred subjects in Würzburg, and as a pupil of Johannes
+Mueller in Berlin.
+
+In 1852 he went with Koelliker to Messina to study the structure and
+development of the marine fauna. Important papers on Siphonophora,
+Echinoderms, Pteropoda, and, later, Hydrozoa and Mollusca, were the
+result. Soon after his return he was offered the chair of Anatomy at
+Jena, and at this retired spot he produced his most important works,
+devoting himself more and more to the study of the Vertebrata. Since
+1875 he has held the Chair of Anatomy at Heidelberg.
+
+In 1859 he published his 'Principles of Comparative Anatomy'; but in
+1870 he remodelled it completely, the theory of descent being the
+guiding principle. These 'Grundzüge' were followed by a somewhat more
+condensed 'Grundriss,' the second edition of which was published
+in 1878, and has been translated into French and English. In the
+meantime he had broken new ground by the development and treatment of
+certain problems concerning the composition and origin of the limbs,
+the shoulder-girdle and the skull, researches which are embodied in
+his 'Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbelthiere,'
+1864-65-72.
+
+In 1883 he brought out a text-book on human anatomy. This also marked
+a new epoch, because for the first time, not only the nomenclature,
+but also the general treatment of human anatomy, was put upon a firm
+comparative anatomical basis. The success of this work is indicated by
+the fact that it reached the sixth edition in 1897.
+
+Lastly, in 1898, appeared the first volume of what may be called his
+crowning work, 'Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere.'
+
+Gegenbaur is universally recognised, not only as the greatest living
+comparative anatomist, but also as the founder of the modern side of
+this science, by having based it on the theory of descent.
+
+In 1896 he received from the Royal Society the Copley medal 'for
+his pre-eminence in the science of comparative anatomy or animal
+morphology.'
+
+His marvellously powerful influence as a teacher and investigator has
+made Heidelberg a centre whence many pupils have spread his teaching,
+and above all his method of research.
+
+ERNST HEINRICH HAECKEL was born on February 16, 1834, at Potsdam. He
+carried out his academical studies alternately at Berlin and Würzburg,
+attracted by such men as Johannes Mueller, Koelliker, and Virchow.
+For years he was undecided what his career should be, whether that
+of botanist, collector, or geographical traveller. Certainly that of
+medicine attracted him least, although in deference to his father's
+wishes he qualified and settled down for a year's practice in Berlin.
+As he himself has told us, he might perhaps have proved rather
+successful as a physician, to judge from the fact that he did not lose
+a single patient. But 'I had only three patients all told, and the
+reason of this is perhaps that I had given on my plate the hours of
+consultation as from 5 to 6 _a.m._'
+
+During the year 1859 he travelled as medical man and artist in Sicily.
+In 1861 he was induced by Gegenbaur, whose acquaintance he had made in
+Würzburg, to establish himself as a _Privat-docent_ for comparative
+anatomy in Jena. And there he has remained ever since, filling the
+Chair of Zoology, and having declined several much more tempting offers
+from the Universities of Würzburg, Vienna, Strassburg, and Bonn.
+
+Within one year, 1865, he wrote the two volumes of his 'Generelle
+Morphologie der Organismen,' as he himself relates, in order to master
+his sorrow over the loss of his first wife. But he broke down, and went
+to the Canaries to recruit health and strength. The 'Morphologie,'
+which has long been out of print,[25] made scarcely any impression. It
+was ignored, probably because he had placed the old-fashioned study of
+zoology and morphology upon a thoroughly Darwinistic basis.
+
+[25] That this great work is now comparatively rare, although still
+in the second-hand market, may perhaps be urged in excuse of the
+fact of so many attempts made by many authors, both professional and
+amateur, to find fault with or to explain the principles of adaptation,
+variation, heredity, cænogenesis, phylogeny, etc., in complete
+ignorance that all these and many more fundamental questions were fully
+discussed more than thirty years ago in the 'Generelle Morphologie.'
+
+On the advice of his friend Gegenbaur, he gave a more popularly
+written abstract of his 'Generelle Morphologie'--in fact, the
+substance of a series of his lectures--in the shape of his 'Natürliche
+Schöpfungsgeschichte.' This 'History of Natural Creation,' which
+in 1898 has reached the ninth edition (first edition translated
+into English in 1873), had the desired effect. So also had his
+'Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen,' the fourth
+edition of which appeared in 1891.
+
+It was a lucky coincidence that Haeckel had just finished his
+preliminary academical studies, was entirely at leisure, and
+undetermined to which branch of natural science he should devote his
+genius, when Darwin's great work was given to the world. Haeckel
+embraced the new doctrine fervently, and, as Huxley was doing in
+England, he spread it and fought for it with ever-increasing vigour in
+Germany.
+
+With marvellous vigour and quickness of perception he applied the
+principles of Evolution or the theory of descent to the whole organic
+world, and not only opened entirely new vistas for the study of
+morphology, but also worked them out and fixed them. He was the first
+to draw up pedigrees of the various larger groups of animals and
+plants, filling the gaps by fossils or with hypothetical forms (the
+necessary existence of which he arrived at by logical deductions);
+and thus he reconstructed the first universal pedigree, a gigantic
+ancestral tree, from the simple unicellular Amoeba to Man. Of course
+these pedigrees were entirely provisional, as he himself has over and
+over again avowed; but they are, nevertheless, the ideal which all
+systematists and morphologists working upon the basis of Evolution have
+since been seeking to establish.
+
+Naturally he was vigorously attacked, not only by anti-Darwinians,
+or rather anti-Evolutionists, but also by many of those who, having
+accepted the principle of transformism, ought to have known better.
+Perhaps they thought they did know better. Imperfections or mistakes in
+details of the grand attempt,--and these, naturally, were many,--were
+singled out as samples of the whole, which was ridiculed as the romance
+of a dreamer.
+
+In the end, however, this hostility, narrow-minded and unfair in
+many respects, has done good to the cause. There has arisen an
+ever-increasing school of workers in favour of the new doctrine. Owing
+to renewed research, criticism, corrections in all directions, we
+now know considerably more about natural classification (and this is
+pedigree) than when Haeckel first opened out the whole problem.
+
+Owing to his fearless mode of exposition, regardless of the indignant
+wrath which the new doctrine aroused in certain ecclesiastical
+quarters, Haeckel bore the brunt of almost endless attacks, and had to
+write polemical essays. The result has been that friend and foe alike
+are now working on the lines which he has laid down; most of the ideas
+which he was the first to conceive, and to formulate by inventing a
+scientific terminology for them, have become important branches, or
+even disciplines, of the science.
+
+Most morphologists of the younger generations now take these terms
+for granted, without remembering the name of their founder. It is,
+therefore, perhaps not quite superfluous to mention some of them:
+
+_Phylum_, or stem, the sum total of all those organisms which have
+probably descended from one common lower form. He distinguished eight
+such phyla--Protozoa, Coelenterata, Helminthes or Vermes, Tunicata,
+Mollusca, Articulata, and Vertebrata. The phyla are more or less
+analogous to 'super-classes,' large branches or 'circles,' or principal
+groups of other zoologists.
+
+_Phylogeny_, the history of the development of these various phyla,
+classes, orders, families, and species.
+
+_Ontogeny_, the history or study of the development of the individual,
+generally called embryology. In reality the scope of embryology
+is the ontogenetic study of the various species, and this branch
+of developmental study alone can be checked by direct, 'exact'
+observation, for the simple reason that the individuals alone are
+entities, while the species, genera, families, etc., are abstract ideas.
+
+The _ontogenesis of any given living organism is a short, condensed
+recapitulation of its ancestral history or of its phylogenesis_. This
+is Haeckel's 'fundamental biogenetic law.'
+
+A complete proof of the phylogeny of any creature would be given by
+the preservation of an unbroken series of all its fossil ancestors.
+Such a series will in most cases, for obvious reasons, always remain a
+desideratum. In a few cases, however, the desideratum is nearly met:
+for example, the ancestral line of the one-toed digitigrade horse from
+a four-or five-toed plantigrade and still very generalized Ungulate is
+approaching completion.
+
+Phylogenetic study has to rely upon other help. This is afforded by
+comparative anatomy and by the study of ontogeny. If the latter were
+a faithful, unbroken recapitulation of all the stages through which
+the ancestors have passed, the whole matter would be very simple; but
+we know for certain that in the individual development many stages
+are left out (or, rather, are hurried through, and are so condensed
+by short-cuts being taken that we cannot observe them), while other
+features which have been introduced obscure, and occasionally modify
+beyond recognition, the original course.
+
+Again, the sequence of the appearance of the various organs is
+frequently upset (_heterochronism_). Some organs are accelerated in
+their development, while others, which we know to be phylogenetically
+older, are retarded in making their reappearance in the embryo.
+
+These disturbing or distorting newly introduced features or factors
+show themselves chiefly in connection with the embryonic conditions of
+growth--for example, yolk-sac, placenta, amnion. They all come within
+the category of _cænogenesis_: they are cænogenetic, while the true,
+undisturbed recapitulation is _palingenetic_.
+
+Lastly, some features, so-called rudimentary or vestigial organs,
+instead of disappearing, are most tenacious in their recurrence,
+while others of originally fundamental importance scarcely leave
+recognisable traces, and are, so to speak, only hinted at during the
+embryonic growth of the creature we happen to study. Hence arises the
+philosophical study of 'Dysteleology.'
+
+Among other terms invented by Haeckel, and now in general use, are
+_Metamere_, _Metamerism_, _Coelom_, _Gonochorism_, _Gastrula_,
+_Metazoa_, _Gnathostomata_, _Acrania_, _Craniota_, and _Amniota_.
+
+Hitherto we have dealt with his general work only, a résumé of which
+he gave for many years in a course of thirty lectures before an
+audience composed of 'all sorts and conditions of men.' Students of
+biology and of medicine side by side with theologians, incipient and
+ordained, jurists, political economists, and philosophers, crowded his
+lecture-room during the 'seventies to hear the master explaining the
+'natural history of creation' or the mysteries of anthropogenesis.
+Another course of eighty lectures during the winter semester was, and
+still is, devoted to a systematic treatment of zoology, while practical
+classes are reserved for the more select.
+
+His winning personality and fascinating eloquence, combined with a
+clear and concise delivery, have gained the enthusiastic admiration of
+many a student who went to the quiet University town in order to learn
+with his own ears and eyes.
+
+_List of Separate Publications by Professor Haeckel._
+
+'Biologische Studien. I.: Studien ueber die Moneren und andere
+Protisten.' Leipzig, 1870 (out of print). He was the first to
+make observations on the natural history of the Monera, living
+bits of protoplasm, devoid even of a nucleus--_e.g._, _Protogenes
+primordialis_, _Protomyxa aurantiaca_.
+
+'Monographie der Radiolarien.' Berlin, 1862-88. With 171 plates.
+
+'Entwicklungsgeschichte der Siphonophoren.' Utrecht, 1869.
+
+'Plankton-Studien. Vergleichende Untersuchungen ueber die Bedeutung und
+Zusammensetzung der pelagischen Fauna und Flora.' Jena, 1880.
+
+'Metagenesis und Hypogenesis von Aurelia aurita.' Jena, 1881.
+
+'Monographie der Geryoniden oder Ruesselquallen.' Leipzig, 1865.
+
+'Generelle Morphologie der Organismen.' 2 vols. Berlin, 1866.
+
+'Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen,' 1874; 4th
+edition, 1891.
+
+'Natuerliche Schoepfungs-Geschichte.' 2 vols. Berlin, 1st edition,
+1868; 9th edition, 1898. This work has been translated into most
+European languages (the first edition in English, under the title
+'Natural History of Creation' in 1873; the eighth in 1892).
+
+'Monographie der Kalkschwaemme.' 3 vols. Berlin, 1872 (out of print).
+With the subtitle, 'An Attempt to solve analytically the Problem of
+the Origin of Species.' In this work, illustrated by sixty plates, he
+showed that the Calcispongia are individually so yielding, so adaptive
+to external influences, that it is practically impossible to break up
+the whole group into anything like satisfactory species or genera.
+According to predilection, we can distinguish either 1 genus with only
+3 species, or 3, 21, 43 genera, with 21, 111, 181, or 289 species
+respectively.
+
+In this work, in 1872, Haeckel established the homology of the two
+primary layers, ecto- and endoderm, throughout the Metazoa. The attempt
+to do the same for the four secondary layers, as made in the second
+part of his 'Gastræa-theory,' failed. It caused an enormous amount of
+research, hitherto without a satisfactory solution of the problem.
+
+'Studien zur Gastræa-Theorie.' Jena, 1874. The transformation of
+the single primitive egg-cell by cleavage into a globular mass of
+cells (Morula)--which latter, becoming hollow (and then known as the
+Blastula), turns ultimately by invagination or by delamination into
+the Gastrula--is a series of processes which applies to all Metazoa.
+The Gastrula is, therefore, the ancestral form of the Metazoa; and the
+Gastræa-theory, founded by Haeckel, throws light, on the one hand, upon
+the mystery of the phyletic connection of the various animal groups,
+while, on the other hand, it connects the Metazoa, or multicellular
+organisms, with the lowest Protozoa. We come to this conclusion
+becaues the Gastrula arises from and passes through stages which exist as
+independent, permanent organisms among the Protozoa.
+
+Needless to say this Gastræa-theory has been violently attacked in
+detail, with the result that various modifications of the Gastrula,
+until then undreamed of, have become known.
+
+'Monographie der Medusen.' Jena, 1879-81. With 72 coloured plates.
+
+'Reports on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S.
+_Challenger_.' With 230 plates:
+
+ 1. Deep-sea Medusæ. 1881.
+ 2. Radiolaria. 1887.
+ 3. Siphonophoræ. 1888.
+ 4. Deep-sea Keratosa. 1889.
+
+A short holiday spent on the coasts of the Red Sea produced the volume
+'Arabische Korallen' (Berlin, 1876); and a longer trip to Ceylon has
+been described in 'Indische Reisebriefe,' of which the third edition
+appeared in 1893. The English translation (1883) is entitled 'A Visit
+to Ceylon.'
+
+'Monism as connecting Religion and Science: the Confession of Faith of
+a Man of Science.' 1894.
+
+Haeckels latest work is the 'Systematische Phylogenie' (Berlin, 1896),
+three volumes dealing with Protistæ and Plants, Invertebrata and
+Vertebrata. They contain the author's views on the natural system of
+the organic world, both living and extinct. Notable in the work are
+the many reconstructions of ancestral forms which, provided Evolution
+is true, must have existed--hypothetical until they, or something like
+them, are found in a fossil state. Everybody who works systematically,
+and upon the basis of Evolution, does, sometimes unconsciously,
+reconstruct such links, although he may perhaps not see the necessity,
+or have the courage to fix his vision, by assigning to it all those
+attributes or characters which are indicated by deductions from
+comparative anatomy, palæontology, and embryology.
+
+
+
+
+ THEORY OF CELLS.
+
+
+The vegetable cell was discovered by _Schleiden_, Professor of Botany
+at Jena, in 1838. Next year _Schwann_ found the animal cell.
+
+In 1844 _Koelliker_ discovered that the egg cell, by division and
+multiplication, becomes an aggregation--a heap of new cells.
+
+In 1849 _Huxley_ found the two primary layers (observed long before
+by _Pander_ and _Baer_ in the chick) also in certain Invertebrata,
+the Medusæ; and he called these layers 'ectoderm' and 'endoderm'
+respectively.
+
+In 1851 _Remak_, in his 'Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der
+Thiere,' showed the egg to be a simple cell, and that from it, by
+repeated division or multiplication, arise the germinal layers, and
+that by differentiation of the cells of these layers are formed all the
+tissues of the body.
+
+_Kowalevsky_, of St. Petersburg, found the two primary germinal layers
+also in Worms, Echinoderms, Articulata, and other animals.
+
+_Haeckel_, in 1872, found the same in the Sponges. He stated that these
+two germinal layers occur in all animals, except in the Protozoa;
+and that they are homologous, or equivalent, in all the groups of
+animals, from the Sponges up to Man. In 1873, in his 'Gastræa-theorie,'
+he explained the phylogenetic significance, and tried to show the
+homology, of the four secondary germinal layers.
+
+
+
+
+ FACTORS OF EVOLUTION.
+
+
+An organism, as living matter, does not stand in opposition to,
+or outside of, the rest of the world. It is part of the world. It
+receives matter from its surroundings, and gives some back; therefore
+it is influenced by its surroundings. It is acted upon, and it reacts
+upon the latter, and if these change (and they are nowhere and never
+strictly the same) the organism also _varies_. It _adapts_ itself, and
+if it does not, or, rather, cannot, do so, it dies, because it is unfit
+to live in the world, or, rather, in those particular surroundings
+and conditions in which it happens to be. That organism which yields
+most easily, accommodates itself most quickly, has the best chance of
+existence--_survival of the fittest_. 'Fitness' in this case does not
+mean fitness to live, but rather a particular condition which happens
+to fit into the new circumstances.
+
+Adaptation and variation are simultaneous: they are fundamentally the
+same. If there were no adaptability and no variability, those simplest
+of organisms which we suppose to have sprung into existence in the
+pre-Cambrian period would long ago have ceased to exist.
+
+It is the physiological momentum which models the organism, and, by
+causing its adaptations, has produced its organs by change of function.
+Gegenbaur illustrates this most important fundamental truth by an
+excellent example. Suppose that, in an absolutely simple organism, all
+the parts of its exterior are under the same functional conditions,
+so that each part of the surface can take in food, and that this is
+digested, assimilated, in the interior. There is, in this condition,
+not yet any definite organ. If this organism sinks to the bottom and
+becomes sessile, this part is excluded from taking in nourishing
+matter, while the opposite surface alone remains, or becomes more, fit
+for this function. Thus, a simple variation and adaptation has been
+produced, and if the same organism continues in this position, its
+bottom cells will estrange themselves from their original function,
+while those on the top will convey the food into the interior, where
+a cavity will be formed, ultimately with a permanent opening, the
+primitive gut and mouth, both very different from the 'foot.'
+
+Thus, by adaptation and variation the organism acquires new functions,
+organs, features, and it gives up and eventually loses others. Its
+offspring is like it. Like produces like. This is the principle of
+_heredity_. Adaptation, when going on generation after generation on
+the same lines in the same direction, becomes continuous, and has an
+intensifying, _cumulative_ effect. By always weeding out from a flock
+of pigeons those birds which possess more dark feathers than the rest,
+we ultimately produce an entirely white race. We hurry on what Nature
+does slowly.
+
+The inheritance of acquired characters becomes very obvious in the
+following example: The Monera are the lowest living organisms known;
+they consist of a mass of protoplasm, and are still devoid of even
+a nucleus. They multiply simply by division; each half is like the
+other, and like the parent (which by this process has ceased to exist),
+except that each is smaller and has to grow. A certain Moneron,
+_Protomyxa aurantiaca_, is orange-coloured, and its offspring is from
+the beginning of the same colour, and this colour has been acquired
+by that kind of Monera-like protoplasm which thereby has become the
+species called Aurantiaca. We have no reason for assuming that there
+existed from the beginning of life not only colourless, but also red,
+orange, and other kinds of protoplasm. In these simplest of organisms
+the whole process of heredity seems very obvious; but in the higher
+ones, in those which propagate by eggs, the problem is infinitely
+more complicated. It is true that the egg is, strictly, nothing but
+a small part of the parental organism, and we know from everyday
+experience that this single egg-cell has in it all the attributes and
+characteristics of the parent; but these attributes and characteristics
+make their appearance successively, just as the egg cell of a chick has
+neither wings nor feathers, not even a backbone, but develops these
+organs because its parents have them.
+
+The theory that acquired characters are hereditary has often been
+vigorously attacked; but the champions of the negative position have
+not given us anything satisfactory instead. They question, also, the
+principle of adaptation as a factor in Evolution, and substitute
+'variation,' coupled with 'natural selection.'
+
+They point to Darwin's argument: (1) It is a fact that animals and
+plants produce a much greater number of young than in their turn grow
+up to propagate the race; (2) no two of the frequently many individuals
+of the same breed are exactly alike, although the differences may be
+hidden to our perception (this is quite true, because no two entities
+can live in absolutely the same place and conditions); (3) through
+heredity the offspring takes over the faculties and features of the
+parents; (4) what decides which of the many individuals (each one
+possessing some aberration or variation) are to live and to propagate
+the race?--obviously those individual variations which happen to make
+the lucky possessors most fit for the struggle for life.
+
+So far, well; but the 'Neo-Darwinians' imagine that 'adaptation'
+is not the cause, but the result, the effect, of the formation of
+species. According to them, the species are neither adapted by, nor do
+they adapt themselves to, their surroundings. Adaptation is to them
+an accomplished fact, a condition which a species happens to be in
+because its particular variation is the one which, to the exclusion of
+others, suits or fits into its surroundings. Such a view simply takes
+variation for granted, and stipulates it as a something _a priori_,
+without raising the further necessary question, why there should be
+any variations at all. Why, indeed, unless they are caused by external
+influences? Haeckel elucidated this by the conception of adaptation as
+explained in the foregoing pages.
+
+These and kindred speculations have produced some rather curious
+discussions, which not infrequently end in conundrums. If we speak of
+a case of adaptation as a condition, a fact, we easily run the risk
+of getting into confusion about cause and effect. For example: Is the
+stag swift because he has long and slender legs, or are his legs long
+because he is swift? In reality, swiftness and length of legs are cause
+and effect in one. His legs have been so modified as to make him swift,
+because he has put them continuously to whatever was his full speed,
+which in his thick-footed ancestors was probably a very slow one. The
+above question reads, therefore, more sensibly as follows: Has the stag
+become swift because his legs have become long and slender, or have his
+legs become long and slender because he has attained swiftness? Now, we
+see that both halves of the double question are practically the same
+and instantly suggest the answer.
+
+A fundamental difference between artificial machines and living
+organisms is that the former are worn out by use, while the latter not
+only repair the loss caused by use, but are also stimulated to further
+increase. On the other hand, organs which are not put into function,
+or are not used, _degenerate_. The various cells of the organ react
+upon external stimuli by increased activity. Why this should be so is
+another question--perhaps because those which do not would soon be not
+fit to survive. Each cell has a function; the more specialized the more
+intense it is. Every external stimulus, every contact with the outer
+surroundings, is an insult, necessarily of detrimental effect, as it
+disturbs the equilibrium of the cell body. It must, therefore, be of
+advantage to the cells' well-being to return as soon as possible to the
+_status quo ante_, and this can only be done by increased activity.
+
+In the present state of our knowledge, we can approach only the
+simplest cases of acquisition of characteristics. Mostly they are
+so complicated, subject to so many unthought-of conditions, that we
+do not know from which end to approach the problem. Frequently the
+supposed use of certain obvious features is the merest guesswork. This
+applies especially to features to which we are not accustomed (although
+wrongly so) to assign a function--for example, coloration. A green
+tree-frog will with predilection rest on green leaves. The advantages
+of concealment are obvious, and in this case he 'adapts himself' to the
+surroundings by making for green localities: if he did not he would
+be eaten up sooner than his more circumspect comrades. But this making
+for, and sitting in, the green has not _necessarily_ made him of that
+colour. Extreme advocates of one view would argue as follows: Once upon
+a time there were among the offspring of ancestral tree-frogs some
+which, among other colours, exhibited green, not much, perhaps not even
+perceptible to our eyes. The occurrence of this colour, according to
+them, was spontaneous, a freak--as if in reality there were anything
+spontaneous in the sense of being causeless. The descendants of these
+more greenish creatures, provided they did not pair with frogs of the
+ordinary set, became still greener (by accumulative inheritance), and
+so on, until the green was pronounced sufficient to be of advantage
+when competition could set in.
+
+With this view there is always the difficulty of understanding how the
+initial very small changes can be useful, unless we have to deal with
+extremely simple organisms. Is it likely in the case of our frogs that
+an almost imperceptible variation in colour makes them more fit to
+live? We have to assume that 'luck' or chance kept them for generations
+out of harm's reach, until the accumulation of green, hitherto quite
+ineffective, neither harmful nor useful, became strong enough to be
+effective. Such cases undoubtedly happen.
+
+But we can also argue out this problem in a somewhat different way,
+which goes nearer to the root of the whole process. The original
+slight, imperceptible change in pigmentation is not a spontaneous
+freak; it was caused by the direct influence of the surroundings in
+which the particular frogs happened to live, be this factor light or
+temperature or food. Thus it stands to reason that the offspring,
+living under similar conditions, will be acted upon in the same way.
+That factor which has added green to the parents will add green to the
+children, until by accumulative inheritance a more decidedly green
+race is produced.
+
+The offspring of green plants do not become green when grown in the
+dark; the young plants inherit not the green, but the capacity of
+becoming green when acted upon by sunlight. This as an instance of
+direct influence of the surroundings on a substance (chlorophyll),
+which has not yet performed a function. But the kittens of a pair of
+black cats produce black hair before they are born, and we have no
+reason to doubt that the black pigment in their tegumentary structures
+is ultimately referable to the action of the sunlight. In many
+instances creatures living for generations in darkness become white,
+pigmentless, and they regain it when exposed to light. For example, the
+white, colourless Proteus from the caves of Adelsberg becomes clouded
+grey, and ultimately jet black, when kept in a tank whence light is not
+strictly excluded.
+
+Blindness is a very general characteristic of creatures which dwell in
+darkness. There are all stages between total blindness and weak eyes.
+Now, do these blind creatures live in darkness because they are blind,
+or have they become first weak-eyed and then blind because of the
+continuous disuse of their eyes? The former explanation has actually
+been suggested! Individuals not smitten, but spontaneously, as a freak,
+born with sore eyes, have crept into the darkness for relief and have
+produced a blind race! To carry such a notion to the bitter end leads
+to absurdities. Anyhow, it is not understandable where the benefit
+of losing the eyesight arises. It can be explained only by continued
+disuse: witness _Spalax typhlus_, the blind mole, and, above all, the
+Endoparasites.
+
+Let us now take an example to explain the influence of a tangible
+external stimulus. Repeated pressure produces callosities. Although
+they are not exactly beneficial in the shape of corns on our toes,
+they are so on our hands. At any rate, the morphologist can trace the
+development of the footpads, nails, hoofs, and horns, step by step from
+small beginnings. The cells of the Malpighian stratum, of the inner,
+active portion of our epidermis, are excited to extra activity, and
+by continually producing more horn cells than peel off the surface of
+the skin in the normal process of wear and tear cause the formation
+of the pad. It need scarcely be mentioned that hypertrophic growths
+are not necessarily useful; they are often harmful, and in that case
+pathological.
+
+Lastly, a few words about the very difficult question of _teleology_.
+In trying to explain Evolution in a mechanical--sometimes called
+monistic, but in reality natural--way, we exclude anything like a
+set purpose, a goal, or ideal, a final condition which the organism
+strives to attain. Unknown, however, to many morphologists, especially
+embryologists, their writings are full of this teleological notion.
+Indeed, there are many cases in which an organism becomes changed, and
+quickly, too, in a way which cannot but be called reasonable. It starts
+modifications, be they outgrowths, alterations in shape or colour, or
+the making good of injuries received, which by 'short-cuts' produce
+the only advantageous result that can reasonably satisfy the new
+requirement or altered circumstances.
+
+Trees growing in precarious positions, after part of the supporting
+rock has slipped away, throw out new roots, and rearrange some of
+the old ones in the only way which could save the tree. In animals
+which have lost part of a limb the wound closes up, and what is left
+is turned into a serviceable stump--for example, in water-tortoises
+(creatures in which reproduction of lost limbs does not happen). In
+frogs and newts the lost part is reproduced, not correctly, but in a
+good semblance. Tortoises which have had their shell smashed can throw
+off an astonishingly large portion and renew the bone as well as the
+overlapping scutes; but this mending is not neatly done. It serves the
+requirement, but it is patchwork; the new shell is such as no tortoise
+ever possessed before.
+
+Mammals transported into colder countries, or subjected to continued
+exposure, grow a thicker coat; and the same kind of tree which in a
+sheltered valley is tall, large-leaved, and soft-wooded, assumes a very
+different aspect, although perhaps growing into a healthy specimen,
+when planted on a wind-exposed hill.
+
+There is no room, or, rather, no time, to apply to these cases the
+principle of many variations or the long-continued accumulation of
+infinitely small changes. The thing is to be done quickly, or not
+at all. Nor can we explain the mending of a wound, which implies an
+activity of countless cells, simply as a case of, or similar to, the
+reproduction of a lost part; against such an explanation militates the
+almost absolute unlikelihood of that precise injury having happened
+before to any of the creature's ancestors.
+
+Still, I think we are brought near the solution of the mystery by
+such considerations. We see no difficulty in the regeneration of a
+few cells, or in the making good of the disturbance suffered by one
+of the most simple organisms; but we become suspicious when we see
+that countless cells, not of one kind, but of the most varied tissues
+and parts of the body, make common cause in remedying a defect in a
+serviceable way.
+
+We must assume that since the beginning of life organisms have been
+subjected to countless insults. We can scarcely speak of a wound in
+an Amæba; but these insults have always been made good, and whenever
+this was not the case, that particular organism came to an end. As
+these organisms developed into more complicated ones, the possible
+insults became more serious, more complicated; and the organisms took
+adaptive measures so as to be superior to them. This action, I have
+no hesitation in declaring, became by heredity a habit. The whole
+creature became so thoroughly 'imbued' (for want of a better word) with
+the finding of ways and means for meeting sudden, serious conditions,
+that it now acts directly, and produces by a short-cut, with the least
+amount of time and with the smallest possible waste of material, that
+which meets the occasion, thereby saving the life of the individual
+and that of the race. This we cannot but call reasonable and to the
+purpose, although it is all carried out by _causæ efficientes_ without
+there being any _causæ finales_.
+
+
+
+
+ GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION.
+
+
+One million years is a stretch of time beyond our conception. We can
+arrive at a more or less adequate understanding of what a million
+individuals or concrete things means. Several Continental nations
+can put more than a million men into the field. We can gaze at a
+building which contains as many bricks; and we know that our own body
+is composed of millions of millions of cells. No such help applies to
+time, because that itself is an entirely relative, abstract conception.
+We can imagine what one hundred years are like--a span of time
+seemingly short to the hale and hearty octogenarian, enormous to the
+child, totally inapplicable to certain animals whose whole life is
+crowded into one single day.
+
+Astronomers have long ceased to reckon distances by miles or any
+other understandable unit. They express the distances between us and
+the stars and nebulæ by 'years of light.' Try to imagine a unit of
+length equal to that which is passed through by light (186,000 miles
+per second) in one year. Not so very long ago the enormous distances
+resulting from astronomical calculations were looked upon as the most
+serious objection to the correctness of the astronomers' views as to
+the distances which separate our globe from the nearest fixed stars.
+We have not yet accustomed ourselves to reckoning time by some similar
+broadly-conceived standard--say æons of so many thousand years each.
+
+Unfortunately, we possess no data whatever for calculating the age
+of the successive geological strata. Thanks to Lyell, the theory of
+violent universal cataclysms has been done away with. It is more
+probable that the same agencies have acted which are now changing
+the aspect of the globe; and these changes are slow, as far as we
+know them--at least, as far as the formation of sedimentary strata is
+concerned, and these alone we have to deal with. Various calculations
+have been made, based upon the denudation of the mountains, the
+filling up of the valleys by the débris, the formation of deltas,
+etc. The results give enormous stretches of time, but all of them
+unsatisfactory, because the methods are so very local in their
+application.
+
+The least objectionable attempt is that which, based upon astronomical
+calculations, tried to fix the height of the last Glacial epoch[26] at
+about 200,000 years ago, and asserted that since its beginning in the
+Pliocene epoch as many as 270,000 years have elapsed. The duration
+of the whole Tertiary period has by the same authorities been fixed
+approximately at 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 years. Beyond this we cannot
+venture without the wildest speculation; but we know to a certain
+extent the thickness of the various sedimentary strata, which amount
+in all to from 100,000 to 175,000 feet--on the average perhaps 130,000
+feet, or about twenty miles.
+
+ [26] James Croll: 'On Geological Time, and the Probable Date of the
+ Glacial and Upper Miocene Period,' _Philos. Magazine_, xxxv., 1868, pp.
+ 363-384; xxxvi., pp. 141-154; 362-386.
+
+Unless we prefer giving up all attempt at calculation as absolutely
+hopeless, and thus resign the whole problem, we must at least try to
+arrive at some results, and then see if these cannot reasonably be made
+use of.
+
+Neither geologist nor physicist, and no zoologist, would accept the
+suggestion that these 130,000 feet of stratified rocks have been
+deposited within only as many years, although the average rate of
+deposit would in that case be not more than 1 foot per year. On the
+other hand, an indignant protest is raised against the assumption of
+1,000,000,000 years.
+
+Lord Kelvin[27] has come to the conclusion (from data which various
+other authorities regard as very unsatisfactory) that not much more
+than 100,000,000 years can have elapsed since the molten globe acquired
+a consolidated crust. Further time must have passed before the surface
+had become stable and cool enough to allow the temperature of the
+collecting oceans to fall below boiling-point, and it is obvious that
+life cannot possibly have begun until after this had happened.
+
+ [27] William Thomson: 'On the Secular Cooling of the Earth,' _Transact.
+ R. S. Edinb._, xxiii., 1864, pp. 157-169.
+
+Wallace, in his 'Island Life,' by making use of Professor A. Geikie's
+results as to the rate of denudation of matter by rivers from the
+area of their basins, and estimating the average rate of deposition,
+concludes that 'the time required to produce this thickness of rock
+[Professor Haughton's maximum of 177,000 feet] at the present rate
+of denudation and deposition is only 28,000,000 years.' Our lower
+assumption of 130,000 feet thickness would give only 20,000,000
+years--a rate of 1 foot in 154 years.
+
+Again, if we prefer round numbers to start with, we have only to
+assume that the age of the whole Tertiary period, with its 3,000 feet
+thickness, is 3,000,000 years (_i.e._, 1,000 feet in 1,000,000 years,
+or 1 foot in 1,000 years, surely an excessively slow rate); then
+130,000,000 years would bring us to the bottom of the Laurentian or
+pre-Cambrian deposits. Of course, it is a pure assumption that the
+same rate of destruction and sedimentation applies to the whole of the
+strata; but we know nothing to the contrary, especially if we consider
+the average periods, the quick periods of extra activity, taken with
+the slow periods or those of standstill.
+
+Dana estimated the length of the whole Tertiary period at one-fifteenth
+of the Mesozoic and Palæozoic combined. If we take the duration of the
+Tertiary period, as before, as 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 years, the total
+will amount to from 45,000,000 to 60,000,000 years.
+
+Lastly, Walcott[28] has estimated the duration of the Palæozoic,
+Mesozoic, and Cænozoic or Tertiary epochs at about 17,000,000,
+7,000,000 and 3,000,000 years respectively, giving 27,700,000 years
+from the beginning of the Cambrian; and Williams[29] has calculated the
+relative duration of the smaller epochs. See the table on p. 149.
+
+The results of all these calculations fall surprisingly well within
+the limits of Lord Kelvin's allowance. Of course they are based upon
+assumptions, but none of them is inherently unreasonable; and it
+was my purpose to draw attention to the surprising coincidence in
+the closeness of these results, perhaps too good to be true. Such
+calculations are considered close enough if they range within a few
+multiples of each other.
+
+ [28] 'Geological Time as indicated by the Sedimentary Rocks of North
+ America.' _Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci._, xlii., 1893, pp. 129-169.
+
+ [29] Henry Shaler Williams, 'Geological Biology.' New York, 1895.
+
+Zoologists have fallen into the habit of requiring enormous lengths of
+time for the evolution of the animal kingdom. We know that Evolution is
+at best a slow process, and the conception of the changes necessary to
+evolve man from monkey-like creatures, these from the lowest imaginary
+mammals, these from some reptilian stock, thence descending to Dipnoan
+fish-like creatures, and so on back into Invertebrata, down to the
+simple Monera--this conception is indeed gigantic. Innumerable, almost
+endless, slow changes require seemingly unlimited time, and as time is
+endless, why not draw upon it _ad libitum_?
+
+Huxley pointed out that it took nearly the whole of the Tertiary epoch
+to produce the horse out of the four-toed Eohippos, and that, if we
+apply this rate to the rest of its pedigree, enormous times would
+be required. This is, however, a very misleading statement, which
+necessitates considerable reduction, in conformity with our increased
+palæontological knowledge. Animals of the genus Equus--namely,
+Ungulata, with one toe, and with a certain tooth pattern--from the
+Upper Miocene of India are now known. Moreover, it is not simply a
+question of the gradual loss of the side-toes. The change from the
+fox-sized little Eohippos and Hyracotherium, so far as skull, teeth,
+vertebral column, and limbs are concerned (about the soft parts we know
+next to nothing), is a very great one indeed.
+
+Elephants and mammoths seem to have developed very rapidly. None are
+known from Eocene strata; but towards the end of the Miocene they had
+spread over Asia, Europe, and North America, and that in great numbers.
+The Eocene Amblypoda are still so different that we hesitate to connect
+them ancestrally with the elephants.
+
+The Pinnipedia (seals and walruses) are strongly modified fissiped
+Carnivora, and have existed since at least the Upper Miocene; the
+transformation must have been accomplished within the Miocene period.
+
+We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that various groups have from the
+time of their first appearance burst out into an exuberant growth of
+modifications in form, size, and numbers, into all possible--and one
+might almost say impossible--shapes; and they have done this within
+comparatively short periods, after which they have died out not less
+rapidly. It seems almost as if these go-ahead creatures had, by
+accepting every possible modification and carrying the same to the
+extreme, too quickly exhausted their plasticity--which, after all,
+must have limits--thereby becoming unable to meet successfully the
+requirements of further changes in their surroundings. The slowly
+developing groups, keeping within main lines of Evolution, and not
+being tempted into aberrant side-issues, had, after all, a much better
+chance of onward evolution.
+
+A good example of the former are the Dinosaurs. We do not know
+their ancestors; but we have here to deal only with their range of
+transformation. The oldest known forms occur in the Upper Trias; they
+attain their most stupendous development in the Upper Jurassic and in
+the Wealden; and they have died out with the Cretaceous epoch. But
+already some of their earliest forms had assumed bipedal gait, and the
+Oolitic Compsognathus had developed almost bird-like hind-limbs.
+
+On the other hand, there are many instances of extremely slow
+development--facts which raise the difficult question of 'persistent
+types.' Are these due to a state of perfection which cannot be improved
+upon? Or are they due to a kind of morphological consolidation (not
+necessarily specialization) which can no longer yield easily, so that
+therefore through changes in their surroundings they may come to an end
+sooner than more plastic groups?
+
+Struthio, the ostrich; Orycteropus, the Cape ant-eater; Tapirus, and
+many others, existed in the Miocene age practically as they are
+now; but pre-Pliocene dolphins, cats, monkeys, stags, all belong to
+closely-allied and well-defined 'genera,' but different from the living
+forms.
+
+Alligators and crocodiles are known from the Upper Chalk; Tomistoma
+since the Miocene; Gavialis since the Pliocene.
+
+The oldest surviving reptile is Sphenodon, the Hatteria of New Zealand,
+a fair representative of what generalized reptiles of the later
+Triassic period seem to have been like; and to the same period belongs
+Ceratodus, the Australian mud-fish, hitherto the oldest known surviving
+genus of a very ancient and low type so far as Vertebrata are concerned.
+
+Now let us see if the above estimates of geological time are so utterly
+inapplicable to animal evolution. On purpose we take one of the lowest
+estimates, about 28,000,000 years, and apportion them equally to the
+various strata or epochs.
+
+The original owner of the famous Trinil skull, a _Pithecanthropus
+erectus_, lived, according to some, in the Late Pliocene, according
+to others in the Early Plistocene, period--that is to say, somewhere
+about the beginning of our last Glacial epoch, some 270,000 years ago.
+Assuming that he and his like reached puberty at sixteen to twenty
+years of age, about 17,000 generations would lie between him and
+ourselves, or, to put it more forcibly, between him and the lowest
+living human races--say the Ceylonese Veddahs. Only 250 generations,
+at twenty years, carry us back to 3000 B.C. (_i.e._, beyond
+the ken of history); and if it be objected that the differences between
+the oldest inhabitants of Egypt, the Naquada, and the present Fellahin
+are very slight, we are welcome to multiply these differences sixty
+or seventy fold, in order to arrive at the Pithecanthropus level.
+But these Naquada had no metal implements, and there cannot be the
+slightest doubt that the development of the human race went on by leaps
+and bounds after certain discoveries had been made--to wit, the use
+of implements and that of fire. That creature which first took up a
+stone or a branch and wielded it thereby got such an enormous advantage
+over his fellow-creatures that his mental and bodily development went
+on apace. The same applies to the improvement of speech. We assume the
+single, monophyletic origin of mankind at one place, in one district;
+and the differences between some of the races of man are great enough
+to constitute what we might call species. Compare the Venus of Milo,
+that noble expression of the ancient Greeks' notion of female beauty,
+with the 'products of art' of the Veddahs or the dwarfs of Central
+Africa, or think of the beau-idéal which a Michael Angelo could
+possibly have evolved if he had never seen any but such people.
+
+ _TIME AND EVOLUTION_
+
+ ======================================================================
+ I. |II.| III. | IV. | V. |VI.| VII.
+ | | | | | |Generations.
+ -----------+---+-----------+----------+--------------+---+------------
+ |} |} |} |Adam and Eve | | 250
+ Recent |} 5|} |} |Man, contem- | | 3,500
+ Plistocene |} |} |} 270,000| porary with | |
+ | |} |} | Reindeer | |
+ | |} |} | in France | |
+ Pliocene -|} |} 3,000,000| |_Pithecanthro-| 16| 17,000
+ |} |} |} 600,000| pus erectus_| |
+ Miocene -|}10|} |} |Anthropoid | 10| 60,000
+ |} |} |}2,100,000| Apes | |
+ Eocene -|} |} |} |Lemures | 5| 420,000
+ | | | | | |
+ Cretaceous | 10|} | 3,600,000| | |
+ Jurassic - | 5|} | 1,800,000| | |
+ Rhætic -|} |} |} |Prototheria, | 3| 1,800,000
+ |} |} |} | or first | |
+ |} |} 7,200,000|} | Mammalia | |
+ Keuper -|} |} |}1,800,000| | |
+ Muschel- |} 5|} |} | | |
+ kalk |} |} |} | | |
+ New Red |} |} |} |Theromorpha | 4| 425,000
+ Sandstone| | | | | |
+ Magnesian |} |} |} | | |
+ Limestone|} |} |} | | |
+ Lower Red |} |} |} |Proreptilia | 4| 250,000
+ Sandstone|} |} |}4,000,000| | |
+ Coal- |}15|} |} |Eotetrapoda | 4| 500,000
+ measures |} |} |} | | |
+ Mountain |} |}17,500,000|} | | |
+ Limestone | |} | | | |
+ Devonian -| 15|} | 4,000,000|Dipnoi and | 5| 1,000,000
+ | |} | |Crossopterygii| |
+ Silurian -| 10|} | 2,700,000|First fishlike| 3| 900,000
+ | |} | | creatures | |
+ Ordovician | 10|} | 2,700,000| | |
+ Cambrian -| 15|} | 4,000,000| Sum total of| |
+ Laurentian | | | | generations| | ---------
+ Archæan | | | | (about) | | 5,375,000
+ or Meta- | | | | | |
+ morphic | | | | | |
+ ======================================================================
+
+EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE ON P. 149.
+
+ Column I. contains the names of the successive sedimentary strata.
+
+ " II. contains the percentage of the duration of the various epochs,
+ according to _Williams_, the time from the Cambrian until recent times
+ being taken as 100.
+
+ " III. gives the estimated duration in years of the Palæozoic,
+ Mesozoic, and Cænozoic periods, according to _Walcott_.
+
+ " IV. gives in years the duration of the various smaller epochs, as
+ computed from Walcott and Williams' statements.
+
+ " V. Representatives of stages of the ancestral line of man. The
+ names stand in the level of the stratum in which they have made their
+ first appearance.
+
+ " VI. contains the number of years which, in the present
+ calculation, have been assumed necessary for the animal to reach
+ puberty.
+
+ " VII. contains the number of generations which can have elapsed
+ from stage to stage. For example, 60,000 generations separate the
+ earliest known anthropoid apes from Pithecanthropus.
+
+Let us follow the descent of man further back. The next stage,
+reckoning backwards, is that from Pithecanthropus to _bonâ-fide_
+anthropoid apes. They are represented in the Miocene by various
+genera--_e.g._, Pliopithecus and Dryopithecus. According to Croll and
+Wallace, 850,000 years ago carry us into the Miocene epoch. Assuming
+that these apes lived about 600,000 years before Pithecanthropus,
+namely, in the later half of the Miocene, and taking puberty at ten
+years of age, a high estimate, we get not less than 60,000 generations.
+
+2. From Apes back to lowest Lemurs in the lowest Eocene. The date of
+Eocene being fixed at 3,000,000, we have about 2,100,000 years for this
+stage; assuming as much as five years for puberty, this results in
+420,000 generations.
+
+3. From Lemures to Prototheria. The earliest known mammalian remains
+come from the Rhætic, or top formation of the Triassic epoch; allowing
+for the Rhætic only 100,000 years, we have to add the whole of the
+Jurassic and Cretaceous, in all about 5,500,000 years. Assuming three
+years for a generation, we get 1,800,000 generations.
+
+4. From Prototheria to something like the Theromorpha at the bottom of
+the Triassic strata. A duration of 1,700,000 years divided by four
+gives 425,000 generations.
+
+5. From Theromorpha to Proreptilia, represented by Eryops and Cricotus
+from the Lower Permian of Texas. Allowing 1,000,000 years, each
+generation at four years, we obtain 250,000 generations.
+
+6. From Proreptilia to Eotetrapoda, the first terrestrial Vertebrata,
+represented by something like the Stegocephali, the earliest of which
+are known from the Coal-measures. Assuming them to have come into
+existence at the bottom of the Coal-measures, for the duration of which
+we may guess 2,000,000 years, we get, with four years' allowance for
+puberty, 500,000 generations.
+
+7. From Eotetrapoda to a not yet separated or differentiated group
+of Crossopterygian and Dipnoan fishes, both of which are known from
+Devonian strata. The duration of the latter has been computed at
+4,000,000 years, which, with 1,000,000 for the Mountain Limestone
+formation, gives us 5,000,000 for this stage. Assuming, for the sake
+of round numbers, as much as five years for a generation, we get
+1,000,000 generations.
+
+8. Earliest stage, down to the first fish-like creatures. Teeth and
+spines indicating the existence of fishes are known from the Upper
+Silurian. By carrying the earliest fishes down to the bottom of the
+Silurian, with 2,700,000 years' duration, and allowing three years for
+attaining puberty, the calculation results in 900,000 generations.
+
+Further back we cannot go. We do not know of any Vertebrate remains
+from the Ordovician and Cambrian, which together represent 6,700,000
+years, enough for at least half as many generations of Prochordate
+creatures. The pre-Cambrian or Laurentian epoch lies quite beyond the
+reach of calculation, nor have we any trustworthy fossil remains of
+living matter from these strata, to which, however, Haeckel and others
+refer the first beginnings of life.
+
+All the above calculations are, of course, only approximate. What we
+do know is the existence of representatives of the stages, our proofs
+being the fossils; but when we refer the origin of the Eotetrapoda,
+for example, to the bottom and not somewhere to the middle of the
+Coal-measures, we are guessing merely. Alterations in the levels
+assumed for the various stage-representatives will, of course, alter
+the result of the number of generations; but the leading idea, as
+a whole, is not thereby upset. The fact remains that in the Upper
+Silurian we have fishes; from the Coal-measures onwards, fishes and
+Amphibia; since the Permian, fishes, Amphibia, and reptiles; since the
+end of the Trias these three classes and the Mammalia; and lastly, at
+least since the Plistocene, man himself. If Evolution is true at all,
+the transformation from early fish-like creatures to man has come about
+within these epochs. Being able to assign a time of duration to each
+of them, with an approximate total of 21,000,000 years, we are also
+able to put the whole ancestral series to a test by expressing each
+great stage in generations. The result is very satisfactory. The whole
+enormous stretch from the lowest fish-like creatures to man has been
+resolved into more than 5,000,000 successive generations, and each of
+these means a little step forwards in onward Evolution.
+
+Nothing is to be gained for the understanding of our problem of
+Evolution if we multiply this enormous number of generations by ten
+or any other multiple. We are not able to conceive changes so small
+as those which necessarily have existed between Pithecanthropus and
+man if the whole striking difference is analysed into 17,000 steps.
+Every one of these stages in the modifications of the muscles, the
+skeletal framework, increase of brain, shortening of the trunk,
+lengthening of the legs, improvement of the hands, loss of the hairy
+coat, etc., is truly microscopical, imperceptible, just as the
+Evolutionist imagines the whole process to have been. Again, where is
+the difficulty implied by the change from an air-breathing, in many
+structural points half-amphibian, fish into a primitive land-crawling
+four-footed creature, if we are allowed to resolve the transformation
+into 1,000,000 stages? So far from there being any difficulty, rather
+does it appear questionable if so many infinitely small changes have
+been necessary to bring about this result.
+
+One thousand years make apparently no difference in the evolution of
+animals, nor does one second change the aspect of the hands on the
+face of a clock, nor did Julius Cæsar's commission of scientific men
+appreciate the error of about eleven minutes in the length of the year
+beyond its real value; but now the Russians are, owing to this neglect,
+nearly two weeks behind the civilized nations.
+
+
+ THE END.
+
+
+ BILLING AND SONS, PRINTERS, GUILDFORD.
+
+
+ By PROFESSOR ERNST HAECKEL
+
+
+ MONISM;
+ OR,
+ The Confession of Faith of a Man of Science.
+
+ Translated from the German by J. D. F. GILCHRIST.
+
+ _Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 1s. 6d. net._
+
+'We may readily admit that Professor Haeckel has stated his case with
+the clearness and courage which we should expect of him, and that
+his lecture may be regarded as a fair and authoritative statement
+of the views now held by a large number of scientifically educated
+people.'--_Times._
+
+'The Monism, which is the substance of his faith, is thus defined by
+him: "Our conviction that there lives one spirit in all things, and
+that the whole cognizable world is constituted, and has been developed,
+in accordance with one common fundamental law." As the confession
+of a distinguished man of science, this little work deserves to be
+read.'--_North British Daily Mail._
+
+'This "Confession of Faith" was delivered by the great German
+scientist, its author, as an extemporaneous address at Altenburg
+rather more than two years ago. There are, no doubt, a large number of
+English readers who will welcome a translation, for this "connecting of
+religion and science" has long troubled many earnest students of modern
+science.'--_Publisher's Circular._
+
+'This is a little book of great daring, an example of the wild
+speculative flights of one of the very ablest and greatest of our
+contemporary men of science.'--_Aberdeen Free Press._
+
+'The address, whatever we may think of its conclusions, is, however,
+most interesting reading, and is admirably done into English by the
+translator.'--_Literary World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., price 7s. 6d. net._
+
+ SOURCES OF THE APOSTOLIC
+ CANONS.
+
+ _With a Treatise on the Origin of the Readership and other Lower Orders._
+
+ By Professor ADOLF HARNACK.
+
+ Translated by LEONARD A. WHEATLEY.
+
+ _With an Introductory Essay on the Organization of the Early Church
+ and the Evolution of the Reader._
+
+ By the Rev. JOHN OWEN, Author of 'Evenings with the Skeptics.'
+
+'Dr. Adolf Harnack is at the present time undoubtedly the leading
+liberal authority in Germany on matters connected with early Christian
+history.'--_The Times._
+
+'Those who are interested in early Church history know how to prize
+anything from the pen of Prof. Harnack. They will not be disappointed
+with the present paper, in which, with his accustomed learning and
+acute criticism, he annotates and comments upon the fragments of
+primitive church law which partly form the basis of the Apostolic
+Canons.'--_British Weekly._
+
+'The wide circulation of this volume would be of the happiest augury
+for a more scientific and worthy conception of the organization of the
+primitive Church.'--Dr. MARCUS DODS in _The Bookman_.
+
+
+
+ _Crown 8vo., cloth, price 1s. 6d. net._
+
+ CHRISTIANITY AND HISTORY.
+
+ By ADOLF HARNACK.
+
+ Translated, with the Author's sanction, by THOMAS BAILEY
+ SAUNDERS, with an Introductory Note.
+
+'It is highly interesting and full of thought. The short introductory
+note with which Mr. Saunders prefaces it is valuable for its
+information and excellent in its tone.'--_Athenæum._
+
+'A singularly able exposition and defence of Christianity, as seen in
+the newer light, by one of the most learned and acute "evangelical"
+critics of Germany. The essay is a masterly one.'--_Glasgow Herald._
+
+' ... We hope the lecture will be widely read.'--_Primitive Methodist
+Quarterly Review._
+
+'The lecture itself is weighty in its every word, and should be read
+and re-read by those desiring to have in a nutshell the central
+positions of modern Christianity.'--_Christian World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Third Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth, price 5s._
+
+ SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF
+ ISRAEL AND JUDAH.
+
+ By J. WELLHAUSEN,
+ PROFESSOR AT MARBURG.
+
+'This work is now issued for the third time as an independent treatise.
+It admirably epitomizes the subject, and exhibits on almost every page
+evidences of Professor Wellhausen's profound study.'--_Publishers'
+Circular._
+
+'We would only say that those who differ from his critical views will
+yet do well to study them, and to read this history in which he applies
+them. Its separate publication, in a handy form and at a moderate
+price, makes it generally accessible.'--_North British Daily Mail._
+
+'The publication in a separate form of Professor Wellhausen's article
+in the "Encyclopædia Britannica" on "Israel" will be very warmly
+welcomed by many readers.'--_Manchester Guardian._
+
+'We are very glad to welcome an edition of Professor Wellhausen's
+"Sketch of the History of Israel and Judah" in a convenient and handy
+form. This is the first time it has appeared in a separate form. It is
+already known to students; it ought now to become popular. It is based
+on the learned author's studies in Hebrew literature and history, and,
+though not controversial in form, it differs totally from orthodox
+presentations of the subject.'--_Westminster Review._
+
+'A sketch which has created such widespread and profound interest as
+this could not be kept in the pages of a voluminous encyclopædia.
+Wellhausen's words necessarily have exceptional importance, even in
+the esteem of those who differ from him _toto coelo_.'--_Baptist
+Magazine._
+
+'The profound scholarship of the author does not elevate his writing
+above the interest of the general reader, and a vivid idea of the
+involved Jewish history is obtainable from this volume.'--_Christian
+Advocate._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., boards, price 3s. 6d. net._
+
+ A CLASSIFICATION OF
+ VERTEBRATA,
+ RECENT AND EXTINCT.
+
+ With Diagnoses and Definitions, a Chapter on Geographical
+ Distribution, and an Etymological Index.
+
+ By HANS GADOW, M.A., PH.D., F.R.S.,
+
+ STRICKLAND CURATOR AND LECTURER ON ZOOLOGY TO THE UNIVERSITY,
+ CAMBRIDGE.
+
+'At the end of his work Dr. Gadow adds a useful chapter on the
+geographical distribution of the Vertebrata, with a table showing
+the approximate number of the known recent species. He also gives
+a fanciful though striking calculation to show how some groups are
+still in the ascendant, while others are distinctly declining. The
+little volume is indeed a welcome addition to the biological student's
+library, and it deserves the wide circulation which its author's
+eminence is likely to ensure for it.'--_Natural Science._
+
+'It is a book, it need hardly be said, for the student; it is simply
+a list of the principal sub-divisions of backboned animals, with just
+as much definition as is needed. It may be regarded as an exceedingly
+concentrated extract of a full text-book of the vertebrates.'--_Daily
+Chronicle._
+
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., cloth, price 21s._
+
+ IN NORTHERN SPAIN.
+
+ By Dr. HANS GADOW, M.A., PH.D., F.R.S.
+
+ _Containing Map and 89 Illustrations._
+
+'Some years back "Wild Spain," one of the best books of its kind,
+made you desirous of knowing more of the country. And Hans Gadow has
+deepened this feeling in his excellent volume "In Northern Spain,"
+and that to an enormous extent. Dwelling at inn or farm, or in their
+own tent, they saw the country as it has been seen but rarely, and
+they came to know the inhabitants as they can be known in no other
+fashion.'--_Black and White._
+
+'To persons visiting the provinces with which the author deals, this
+book will be invaluable, and will do more to point their attention to
+objects of interest than existing guide-books of Spain, most of which
+are out of date.'--_The Field._
+
+'About the best book of European travel that has appeared these many
+years.'--_Literary World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+Transcriber's Notes
+
+ Variations in spelling, punctuation and hyphenation have been retained
+ except in obvious cases of typographical errors.
+ Inconsistent hyphenation and spelling are as in the oringinal.
+ Italics are shown thus _italic_ and underline thus *underline*.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAST LINK ***
+
+***** This file should be named 44541-8.txt or 44541-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/4/4/5/4/44541/
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Les Galloway and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+ www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
+North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
+contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
+Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
diff --git a/old/44541-8.zip b/old/44541-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f8527e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/44541-h.zip b/old/44541-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..63c2efc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/44541-h/44541-h.htm b/old/44541-h/44541-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e67ae93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541-h/44541-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,5614 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel.
+ </title>
+<link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+body {
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+h1
+{
+ margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em;
+ text-align: center;
+ font-size: x-large;
+ font-weight: normal;
+ line-height: 1.6;
+}
+ h2,h3{
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+.spaced
+{
+ line-height: 1.5;
+}
+
+.space-above
+{
+ margin-top: 3em;
+}
+
+p
+{
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+}
+
+ .small {font-size: small;}
+ .medium {font-size: medium;}
+ .large {font-size: large;}
+
+hr {
+ width: 33%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+hr.tb {width: 45%;}
+hr.chap {width: 65%}
+hr.full {width: 95%;}
+
+table {
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+}
+
+ .tdl {text-align: left;}
+ .tdr {text-align: right;}
+ .tdc {text-align: center;}
+
+.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
+ visibility: hidden;
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 92%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: right;
+} /* page numbers */
+
+.linenum {
+ position: absolute;
+ top: auto;
+ left: 4%;
+} /* poetry number */
+
+.blockquot {
+ margin-left: 5%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+.center {text-align: center;}
+
+.right {text-align: right;}
+
+.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+
+.u {text-decoration: underline;}
+
+@media handheld
+
+{.chapter-beginning
+ {page-break-before: always;}
+}
+
+/* Images */
+.figcenter {
+ margin: auto;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+/* Footnotes */
+.footnotes {border: dashed 1px;}
+
+.footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
+
+.footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;}
+
+.fnanchor {
+ vertical-align: super;
+ font-size: .8em;
+ text-decoration:
+ none;
+}
+
+/* Transcriber's notes */
+.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA;
+ color: black;
+ font-size:smaller;
+ padding:0.5em;
+ margin-bottom:5em;
+ font-family:sans-serif, serif; }
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Last Link
+ Our Present Knowledge of the Descent of Man
+
+Author: Ernst Haeckel
+
+Commentator: Hans Gadow
+
+Release Date: December 29, 2013 [EBook #44541]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAST LINK ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Les Galloway and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+<h1>THE LAST LINK</h1>
+
+<p class="center">OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE
+ DESCENT OF MAN</p>
+
+<p class="center space-above"><small>BY</small><br />
+ERNST HAECKEL<br />
+<small>(JENA)</small></p>
+
+<p class="center space-above"><small>WITH NOTES AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES<br />
+BY</small><br />
+HANS GADOW, F.R.S.<br />
+<small>(CAMBRIDGE)</small></p>
+
+
+<p class="center space-above">LONDON<br />
+ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK<br />
+1898</p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+
+<h2>CONTENTS.</h2>
+
+<table id="toc" summary="contents">
+<tr>
+ <td>&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><span class="smcap">page</span></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"><big>THE LAST LINK</big></td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; INTRODUCTORY</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_8">8</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; PALÆONTOLOGY</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_20">20</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; OTHER EVIDENCE</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_42">42</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; STAGES RECAPITULATED</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_47">47</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"><big>BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES:</big></td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; LAMARCK, SAINT-HILAIRE, CUVIER, BAER,</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; MUELLER, VIRCHOW, COPE, KOELLIKER, GEGENBAUR,</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; HAECKEL</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_80">80</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">THEORY OF CELLS</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_115">115</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">FACTORS OF EVOLUTION</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_117">117</a></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_135">135</a></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+
+<hr class="chap" />
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+
+<h2>NOTE</h2>
+
+
+<p>The address I delivered on August 26 at the
+Fourth International Congress of Zoology at
+Cambridge, 'On our Present Knowledge of
+the Descent of Man,' has, I find, from the
+high significance of the theme and the
+general importance of the questions connected
+with it, excited much interest, and
+has led to requests for its publication.
+Hence this volume, edited by my friend
+Dr. H. Gadow, my pupil in earlier days,
+who has not only revised the text, but has
+also enriched it by many valuable additions
+and notes.</p>
+
+<p class="right">ERNST HAECKEL.</p>
+
+<p><small><i>Jena, December, 1898.</i></small></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap" />
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>THE LAST LINK</h2>
+
+
+<p>At the end of the nineteenth century, the
+age of 'natural science,' the department of
+knowledge that has made most progress is
+zoology. From zoology has arisen the study
+of transformism, which now dominates the
+whole of biology. Lamarck<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> laid its foundation
+in 1809, and forty years ago Charles
+Darwin obtained for it a recognition which
+is now universal. It is not my task to repeat
+the well-known principles of Darwinism. I
+am not concerned to explain the scientific
+value of the whole theory of descent. The
+whole of our biological study is pervaded by
+it. No general problem in zoology and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</a></span>
+botany, in anatomy and physiology, can be
+discussed without the question arising, How
+has this problem originated? What are the
+real causes of its development?</p>
+
+<p>This question was almost unknown seventy
+years ago, when Charles Darwin, the great
+reformer of biology, began his academical
+career at Cambridge as a student of theology.
+In the same year, 1828, Carl Ernst von
+Baer<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> published in Germany his classical
+work on the embryology of animals, the first
+successful attempt to elucidate by 'observation
+and reflection' the mysterious origin
+of the animal body from the egg, and to
+explain in every respect the 'history of the
+growing individuality.' Darwin at that time
+had no knowledge of this great advance, and
+he could not divine that forty years later
+embryology would be one of the strongest
+supports of his own life's work&mdash;of that very
+theory of transformism which, founded by
+Lamarck in the year of Darwin's birth,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</a></span>
+was accepted with enthusiasm by Charles's
+grandfather Erasmus. There is no doubt
+that of all the celebrated naturalists of the
+nineteenth century Darwin achieved the
+greatest success, and we should be justified
+in designating the last forty years as the
+Age of Darwin.</p>
+
+<p>In searching for the causes of this unexampled
+success, we must clearly separate
+three sets of considerations: first, the comprehensive
+reform of Lamarck's transformism,
+and its firm establishment by the many
+arguments drawn from modern biology;
+secondly, the construction of the new theory
+of selection, as established by Darwin, and
+independently by Alfred Wallace (a theory
+called Darwinism in the proper sense);
+thirdly, the deduction of anthropogeny, that
+most important conclusion of the theory of
+descent, the value of which far surpasses all
+the other truths in evolution.</p>
+
+<p>It is the third point of Darwin's theory
+that I shall discuss here; and I shall discuss<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span>
+it chiefly with the intention of examining
+critically the evidence and the different
+conclusions which at present represent our
+scientific knowledge of the descent of man
+and of the different stages of his animal
+pedigree.</p>
+
+<p>It is now generally admitted that this
+problem is the most important of all biological
+questions. Huxley was right when
+in 1863 he called it the question of questions
+for mankind. The problem which underlies
+all others, and is more deeply interesting than
+any other, is as to the place which man
+occupies in nature and his relations to the
+universe of things. 'Whence our race has
+come; what are the limits of our power over
+nature, and of nature's power over us; to
+what goal are we tending&mdash;these are the
+problems which present themselves anew
+and with undiminished interest to every man
+born into the world.' This impressive view
+was explained by Huxley thirty-five years ago
+in his three celebrated essays on 'Evidence<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span>
+as to Man's Place in Nature.' The first is
+entitled 'On the Natural History of the Man-like
+Apes'; the second, 'On the Relations of
+Man to the Lower Animals'; the third, 'On
+some Fossil Remains of Man.' Darwin himself
+felt the burden of these problems as much
+as Huxley; but in his chief work, 'On the
+Origin of Species,' in 1859, he had purposely
+only just touched them, suggesting that the
+theory of descent would shed light upon the
+origin of man and his history. Twelve years
+later, in his celebrated work on 'The Descent
+of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex,'
+Darwin discussed fully and ingeniously all
+the different sides of this 'question of
+questions' from the morphological, historical,
+physiological, and psychological points of
+view. As early as 1866 I myself had applied
+in the <i>Generelle Morphologie der Organismen</i>
+the theory of transformism to anthropology,
+and had shown that the fundamental law of
+biogeny claims the same value for man as for
+all the other animals. The intimate causal<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</a></span>
+connection between ontogeny and phylogeny,
+between the development of the individual and
+the history of its ancestors, enables us to gain
+a safe and certain knowledge of our ancestral
+series. I had at that time distinguished in
+this series ten chief degrees of vertebrate
+organization. I attributed the highest importance
+to the logical connection of anthropogeny
+with transformism. If the latter be
+true, the truth of the former is absolute.
+'Our theory that man is descended from
+lower vertebrates, and immediately from apes
+or primates, is a case of special <i>deduction</i>
+which follows with absolute certainty from the
+general <i>induction</i> of the theory of descent.'
+The full proof and detailed explanation of
+this view was afterwards given in my
+'History of Natural Creation,' and especially
+in my 'Anthropogeny.'<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> Lastly, it has
+received an ample scientific and critical
+foundation in the third part of my 'Systematic
+Phylogeny.'<sup>[3]</sup></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span></p>
+<p>During the forty years which have elapsed
+since Darwin's first publication of his theories
+an enormous literature, discussing the <i>general
+problems</i> of transformism as well as its special
+application to man, has been published. In
+spite of the wide divergence of the different
+views, all agree in one main point: the
+natural development of man cannot be separated
+from general transformism. There are
+only two possibilities. Either all the various
+species of animals and plants have been
+created independently by supernatural forces
+(and in this case the creation of man also is a
+miracle); or the species have been produced
+in a natural way by transmutation, by adaptation
+and progressive heredity (and in this
+case man also is descended from other vertebrates,
+and immediately from a series of
+primates). We are absolutely convinced that
+only the latter theory is fully scientific. To
+prove its truth, we have to examine critically
+the strength of the different arguments claimed
+for it.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+
+<h2>I.</h2>
+
+
+<p>First, we have to consider the relative
+place which comparative anatomy concedes
+to man in the 'natural system' of animals,
+for the true value of our 'natural classification'
+is based upon its meaning as a pedigree.
+All the minor and major groups of the system&mdash;the
+classes, legions, orders, families, genera,
+and species&mdash;are only different branches of
+the same pedigree. For man himself, his
+place in the pedigree has been fixed since
+Lamarck,<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> in 1801, defined the group of
+vertebrates. The most perfect<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> of these are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span>
+the Mammalia; and at the head of this class
+stands the order of Primates, in which Linnæus,
+in 1735, united four 'genera'&mdash;Homo,
+Simia, Lemur, and Vespertilio. If we exclude
+the last-named, the Chiroptera of modern
+zoology, there remain three natural groups of
+Primates&mdash;the Lemures, the Simiæ, and the
+Anthropi or Hominidæ. This is the classification<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span>
+of the majority of zoologists; but if we
+compare man with the two chief groups of
+monkeys&mdash;the Eastern monkeys (or Catarrhinæ)
+and the Western or American monkeys
+(Platyrrhinæ)&mdash;there can be no doubt that the
+former group is much more closely related to
+man than is the latter. In the natural order
+of the Catarrhinæ we find united a long series
+of lower and higher forms. The lowest, the
+Cynopitheci, appear still closely related to
+the Platyrrhinæ and to the Lemures; while,
+on the other hand, the tailless apes (Anthropomorphæ)
+approach man through their
+higher organization. Hence one of our best
+authorities on the Primates, Robert Hartmann,<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a>
+proposed to subdivide the whole
+order of the Simiæ into three groups:</p>
+
+<p>(1) Primarii, man together with the other
+Anthropomorphæ, or tailless apes; (2)
+Simiæ, all the other monkeys; (3) Prosimiæ,
+or Lemurs. This arrangement has received<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span>
+strong support from the interesting discovery
+by Selenka that the peculiar placentation of
+the human embryo is the same as in the
+great apes, and different from that of all the
+other monkeys. Our choice between these
+different classifications of Primates is best
+determined by the important thesis of Huxley,
+in which, in 1863, he carried out a most careful
+and critical comparison of all the anatomical
+gradations within this order. In my opinion,
+this ingenious thesis&mdash;which I have called the
+Huxleyan Law, or the 'Pithecometra-thesis
+of Huxley'&mdash;is of the utmost value. It runs
+as follows: 'Thus, whatever system of
+organs be studied, the comparison of their
+modifications in the ape-series leads to one
+and the same result&mdash;that the structural
+differences which separate man from the
+gorilla and the chimpanzee are not so great
+as those which separate the gorilla from the
+lower apes.' If we accept the Huxleyan
+law without prejudice, and apply it to the
+natural classification of the Primates, we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span>
+must concede that man's place is within the
+order of the Simiæ. On examining this
+relation with care, and judging with logical
+persistence, we may even go a step further.
+Instead of the wider conception of 'Simiæ,'
+we must use the restricted term of Catarrhinæ,
+and our Pithecometra-thesis has then
+to be formulated as follows: <i>The comparative
+anatomy of all organs of the group of Catarrhine
+Simiæ leads to the result that the
+morphological differences between man and
+the great apes are not so great as are those
+between the man-like apes and the lowest
+Catarrhinæ</i>. In fact, it is very difficult to
+show why man should not be classed with
+the large apes in the same zoological family.
+We all know a man from an ape; but it is
+quite another thing to find differences which
+are absolute and not of degree only. Speaking
+generally, we may say that man alone
+combines the four following features: (1)
+Erect walk; (2) extremities differentiated
+accordingly; (3) articulate speech; (4) higher<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span>
+reasoning power. Speech and reason are
+obviously relative distinctions only&mdash;the direct
+result of more brains and more brain-power,
+the so-called mental faculties. The erect walk
+is not an absolutely distinguishing characteristic:
+the large apes likewise walk on their
+feet only, supporting their bodies by touching
+the ground with the backs of their hands&mdash;in
+fact, with their knuckles&mdash;and this is a mode
+of progression very different from that of the
+tailed monkeys, which walk upon the palms
+of their hands. There are, however, two
+obvious differences in the development of
+the muscles. In man alone the gastrocnemius
+and the soleus muscle are thick
+enough to form the calf of the leg, and
+the glutæus maximus is enlarged into the
+buttocks. A fourth glutæal muscle occurs
+occasionally in man, while it is constantly
+present in apes as the so-called musculus
+scansorius. Concerning the muscles of the
+whole body, we cannot do better than quote
+Testut's summary: 'The mass of recorded<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span>
+observations upon the muscular anomalies in
+man is so great, and the agreement of many
+of these with the condition normal in apes is so
+marked, that the gap which usually separates
+the muscular system of man from that of the
+apes appears to be completely bridged over.'</p>
+
+<p>There are, for example, the muscles of the
+ear. In most people the majority, or even
+all of them, are no longer movable at will,
+while in the apes they are still in use. The
+important point, however, is that these
+muscles are still present in man, although
+often in a reduced condition. They are the
+following: (1) Musculus auricularis anterior
+or attrahens auris, which is frequently much
+reduced and no longer reaches the ear at all,
+being then absolutely useless; (2) Musculus
+auricularis superior or attollens auris, more
+constant than the former; (3) Musculus
+auricularis posterior or retrahens auris, likewise
+often functional. Occasionally smaller
+slips differentiated from these three muscles
+are present, and as so-called intrinsic muscles<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</a><br /><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</a></span>
+are restricted to the ear itself; their function
+is, or was, that of curling up or opening the
+external ear.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter"><a href="./images/i_0231.jpg">
+ <img src="./images/i_0231.jpg" alt="Outlines of the Left Ear"></img></a>
+</div>
+<p class="center"><span class="smcap">Outlines of the Left Ear of&mdash;</span></p>
+
+<blockquote>
+<p><small>1. <i>Lemur macaco</i>; 2. <i>Macacus rhesus</i>, the Rhesus monkey;
+3. Cercopithecus, a macaque; 4. human embryo of six months;
+5. man, with Darwin's point well retained: the dotted outline is that
+of the ear of a baboon; 6. orang-utan (after G. Schwalbe):<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> <sup>x</sup> the
+original tip of the ear; 7. human ear with the principal muscles.</small></p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>In connection with the ear, I may touch
+upon another interesting and most suggestive
+little feature which is present in many
+individuals&mdash;namely, 'Darwin's point.' This
+is the last remnant of the original tip of the
+ear, before the outer, upper, and hinder rim
+became doubled up or folded in. It is a
+feature quite useless, and absolutely impossible
+of interpretation, excepting as the vestige of
+such previous ancestral conditions as are
+normal in the monkeys.</p>
+
+<p>In some cases the reduction of muscles
+has proceeded further in apes than in man&mdash;for
+example, the muscles of the little toe.
+Another instance is afforded by the coccyx or
+vestige of the tail; this is still furnished with
+muscles which are now in man, as well as in
+the apes, quite useless, and vary considerably
+with every sign of degeneration, most so in
+the orang-utan.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Darwin has mentioned the frequent action
+of the 'snarling muscle,' by which, in sneering,
+our upper canine teeth are exposed, like those
+of a dog prepared to fight.</p>
+
+<p>Monkeys and apes possess vocal sacs,
+especially large in the orang-utan; survivals
+of them, although no longer used, persist in
+man in the shape of a pair of small diverticula,
+the pouches of Morgagni, between the
+true and the false vocal cords.</p>
+
+<p>'In the native Australians, the dental formula
+appears least removed from the hypothetical
+original type, for in it are still found
+complete rows of splendid teeth, with powerfully-developed
+canines and molars, the latter
+being either uniform, or even increasing in
+size, as we proceed backwards, in such a
+way that the wisdom tooth is the largest of
+the series. This is decidedly a pithecoid
+characteristic which is always found in apes.
+The upper incisors of the Malay, apart from
+their prognathous disposition, have occasionally
+a distinctly pithecoid form, their anterior<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span>
+surface being convex, and their lingual surface
+slightly concave. The ancestors of
+Europeans seem to have had the same form
+of teeth, for the oldest existing fragments of
+skulls from the Mammoth age (<i>e.g.</i>, the jaws
+from La Naulette, in Belgium) reveal tooth-forms
+which must be classed with those of
+the lowest races of to-day.'<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
+
+<p>Now we are able to apply this fundamental
+Pithecometra-thesis directly to the classification
+of the Primates and to the phylogeny of
+man, which is intimately connected with it,
+because in this order, as in all the other
+groups of animals, the natural system is the
+clear expression of true phylogenetic affinity.
+Four results follow from our thesis: (1) The
+Primates, as the highest legion or order of
+mammals, form one natural, monophyletic
+group. All the Lemures, Simiæ, and
+Homines descend from one common ancestral<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span>
+form, from a hypothetical 'Archiprimas.'
+(2) The Lemures are the older and
+lower of the natural groups of the Primates;
+they stand between the oldest Placentalia
+(Prochoriata) and the true Simiæ. (3) All
+the Catarrhinæ, or Eastern Simiæ, form one
+natural monophyletic group. Their hypothetical
+common ancestor, the Archipithecus,
+may have descended directly or indirectly
+from a branch of the Lemures. (4) Man
+is descended directly from one series of
+extinct Catarrhine ancestors. The more
+recent ancestors of this series were tailless
+anthropoids (similar to the Anthropopithecus),
+with five sacral vertebræ. The
+more remote ancestors were tailed Cercopitheci,
+with three or four sacral vertebræ.</p>
+
+<p>These four theses possess, in my opinion,
+absolute certainty. They are independent of
+all future anatomical, embryological, and
+palæontological discoveries which may possibly
+throw more light upon the details of
+our phyletic anthropogenesis.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>II.</h2>
+
+
+<p>The next question is, how the facts of
+palæontology agree with these most important
+results of comparative anatomy and ontogeny.
+The fossils are the true historical 'medals of
+creation,' the palpable evidence of the historical
+succession of all those innumerable
+organic forms which have peopled the globe
+for many millions of years. Here the question
+arises, If the known fossil specimens of Mammalia,
+and particularly of Primates, give proof
+of these Pithecometra-theses, do they confirm
+directly the descent of man from ape-like
+creatures? The answer to this question
+is, in my opinion, affirmative.</p>
+
+<p>It is true that the gaps in the palæontological
+evidence, here as elsewhere, are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span>
+many and keenly felt. In the order of the
+Primates they are greater than in many
+other orders, chiefly because of the arboreal
+life of our ancestors. The explanation is very
+simple. It is really due to a long chain of
+favourable coincidences if the skeleton of a
+vertebrate, covered as it was with flesh and
+skin, and containing still more perishable
+viscera, is petrified at all. The body may be
+devoured by other creatures, and its bones
+scattered about; or it rots away and crumbles
+to pieces. Many animals hide in thick undergrowth
+when death approaches them; and,
+leading an almost entirely arboreal life, the
+Primates are especially likely to disappear
+without being fossilized. It is only when the
+body is quickly covered with sand, or is embedded
+in suitable lime or silica containing
+mud, that the process of petrifaction can
+come to pass. Even then it is only by great
+good luck that we come across such a fossil.
+Very few countries have been searched
+systematically, and the areas that have been<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</a></span>
+searched amount to little in comparison with
+the whole surface of the land, even if we
+leave out of account the fact that more than
+two-thirds of the globe are covered by water.</p>
+
+<p>These deplorable deficiencies of empirical
+palæontology are balanced on the other side
+by a growing number of positive facts, which
+possess an inestimable value in human
+phylogeny. The most interesting and most
+important of these is the celebrated fossil
+<i>Pithecanthropus erectus</i>, discovered in Java
+in 1894 by Dr. Eugène Dubois.<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> Three
+years ago this now famous ape-like man
+provoked an animated discussion at the third
+International Zoological Congress at Leyden.
+I may therefore be allowed to say a few
+words as to its scientific significance. Unfortunately,
+the fossil remains of this creature
+are very scanty: the skull-cap, a femur, and
+two teeth. It is obviously impossible to form<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span>
+from these scanty remains a complete and
+satisfactory reconstruction of this remarkable
+Pliocene Primate.</p>
+
+<p>The more important points are the following:
+The remains in question rested upon a
+conglomerate which lies upon a bed of marine
+marl and sand of Pliocene age. Together
+with the bones of Pithecanthropus were found
+those of Stegodon, Leptobos, Rhinoceros, Sus,
+Felis, Hyæna, Hippopotamus, Tapir, Elephas,
+and a gigantic Pangolin. It is remarkable
+that the first two of these genera are now
+extinct, and that neither hippopotamus nor
+hyæna exists any longer in the Oriental region.
+If we may judge from these fossil remains,
+the bones of Pithecanthropus are not younger
+than the oldest Pleistocene, and probably
+belong to the upper Pliocene. The teeth
+are like those of man. The femur, also, is
+very human, but shows some resemblances
+to that of the gibbons. Its size, however,
+indicates an animal which stood when erect
+not less than 5 feet 6 inches high. The<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span>
+skull-cap also is very human, but with very
+prominent eyebrow ridges, like those of
+the famous Neanderthal cranium. It is
+certainly not that of an idiot. It had an
+estimated cranial capacity of about 1,000
+cubic centimetres&mdash;that is to say, much
+more than that of the largest ape, which
+possesses not more than 600 c.c. The crania
+of female Australians and Veddahs measure
+not more than 1,100, some even less than
+1,000 c.c.; but, as these Veddah women stand
+only about 4 feet 9 inches high, the computed
+cranial capacity of the much taller Pithecanthropus
+is comparatively very low indeed.<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter"><a href="./images/i_0331.jpg">
+ <img src="./images/i_0331.jpg" alt="Skulls"></img></a>
+</div>
+
+<blockquote>
+<p><small>The upper figure represents the outlines of the skull of Pithecanthropus,
+as restored by Manouvier.<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> The lower figure shows the
+comparative size and shape of Pithecanthropus, the Neanderthal
+skull, a specimen of the Cro-Magnon race of neolithic France, and a
+Young Chimpanzee before the full development of the supraorbital
+crests</small>.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>The final result of the long discussion at
+Leyden was that, of twelve experts present,
+three held that the fossil remains belonged
+to a low race of man; three declared them
+to be those of a man-like ape of great size;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</a><br /><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span>
+the rest maintained that they belonged to an
+intermediate form, which directly connected
+primitive man with the anthropoid apes.
+This last view is the right one, and accords
+with the laws of logical inference. <i>Pithecanthropus
+erectus</i> of Dubois is truly a
+Pliocene remainder of that famous group of
+highest Catarrhines which were the immediate
+pithecoid ancestors of man. He is, indeed, the
+long-searched-for 'missing link,' for which, in
+1866, I myself had proposed the hypothetical
+genus Pithecanthropus, species Alalus.</p>
+
+<p>It must, however, be admitted that this
+opinion is still strongly combated by some
+distinguished authorities. At the Leyden
+Congress it was attacked by the illustrious
+pathologist Rudolf Virchow.<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> He, however,
+is one of the minority of leading men of
+science who set themselves to refute the
+theory of Evolution in every possible way.
+For thirty years he has defended the thesis:
+'It is quite certain that man is not a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span>
+descendant of apes.' He declares any intermediate
+form to be unimaginable save in a
+dream.</p>
+
+<p>Virchow went to the Leyden Congress
+with the set purpose of disproving that the
+bones found by Dubois belonged to a creature
+which linked together apes and man. First,
+he maintained that the skull was that of an
+ape, while the thigh belonged to man. This
+insinuation was at once refuted by the expert
+palæontologists, who declared that without
+the slightest doubt the bones belonged to
+one and the same individual. Next, Virchow
+explained that certain exostoses or growths
+observable on the thigh proved its human
+nature, since only under careful treatment
+the patient could have healed the original
+injury. Thereupon Professor Marsh, the
+celebrated palæontologist, exhibited a number
+of thigh-bones of wild monkeys which
+showed similar exostoses and had healed
+without hospital treatment. As a last argument
+the Berlin pathologist declared that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span>
+the deep constriction behind the upper
+margin of the orbits proved that the skull
+was that of an ape, as such never occurred in
+man. It so happened that a few weeks later
+Professor Nehring of Berlin demonstrated
+exactly the same formation on a human prehistoric
+skull received by him from Santos,
+in Brazil.</p>
+
+<p>Virchow was, in fact, just as unlucky in
+Leyden in his fight with our pliocene
+ancestor as he had been unfortunate in his
+opinion on the famous skulls of Neanderthal,
+Spy, La Naulette, etc., every one of which he
+explained as a pathological abnormality. It
+would be a very curious coincidence indeed if
+all these and other fossil human remains
+were those of idiots or otherwise abnormal
+individuals, provided they are old and low
+enough in their organization to be of phylogenetic
+value to the unbiassed zoologist.</p>
+
+<p>As the sworn adversary of Evolution,
+transformism, and Darwinism in particular,
+but a believer in the constancy of species, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</a></span>
+great and renowned pathologist has been
+driven to the incredible contention that all
+variations of organic forms are pathological.</p>
+
+<p>Four years ago, as honorary president of
+the Anthropological Congress at Vienna, he
+attacked Darwinism in the severest manner,
+and declared that 'man may be as well
+descended from the elephant or from the
+sheep as from the ape.' Such attacks on the
+theory of transformism indicate a failure to
+understand the principles of the theory of
+Evolution and to appreciate the significance
+of palæontology, comparative anatomy, and
+ontogeny.</p>
+
+<p>The thousands of other objections which
+have been made during the last forty years
+(chiefly by outsiders) may be passed over in
+silence. They do not require serious refutation.
+In spite of, or perhaps because of,
+these attacks, the theory of Evolution stands
+established more firmly than ever.</p>
+
+<p>It is easy for the outsider to exult over the
+difficulties which our problem implies&mdash;diffi<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span>culties
+which we who have given our lives to
+the study understand likewise, and try our
+best not only to bridge over, but also to
+point out. Anyhow, we do not conceal
+them; while those who reject the explanation
+offered by Evolution make the most of the
+gaps, and pass silently over the far more
+numerous points favourable to our theory.</p>
+
+<p>How fruitful during the last thirty years
+the astonishing progress in our palæontological
+knowledge has been for our Pithecometra-thesis
+is best shown by a short glance
+at the growth of our knowledge of fossil
+Primates. Cuvier,<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> the founder of palæontology,
+continued up to the time of his death,
+in 1832, to assert that fossil remains of
+monkeys and lemurs did not exist. The
+only skull of a fossil lemuroid which he described
+(namely, Adapis) he declared to be
+that of an ungulate. Not until 1836 were
+the first fragments of extinct monkeys found
+in India; it was two years later, near Athens,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span>
+that the skeleton of <i>Mesopithecus penthelicus</i>
+was discovered. Other remains of lemurs
+were found in 1862. But during the last
+twenty years the number of fossil Primates
+has been augmented by the remarkable discoveries
+of Gaudry, Filhol, Milne Edwards,
+Seeley, Schlosser, and others in Europe; of
+Marsh, Cope, Osborn, Leidy, Ameghino, in
+South America; and Forsyth Major in
+Madagascar.<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> These tertiary remains, chiefly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</a></span>
+of Eocene and Miocene date, fill many gaps
+between existing genera of Primates, and
+afford us quite a clear insight into the phyletic
+development of this order during the
+millions of years of the Cænozoic age.</p>
+
+<p>The most important difference between the
+two groups of existing monkeys is indicated
+by their dentition. Adult man possesses,
+like all the other Catarrhine Simiæ, thirty-two
+teeth, whilst the American monkeys (the
+Platyrrhinæ) have thirty-six teeth&mdash;namely,
+one pair of premolars more in the upper and
+lower jaws. Comparative odontology leads
+us to the phylogenetic conclusion that this
+number has been produced by reduction from
+a still older form with forty-four teeth. This
+typical dental formula (three incisors, one
+canine, four premolars, and three molars, in
+each half-jaw) is common to all those most
+important older mammals which in the beginning
+of the Eocene period constituted the four
+large groups of Lemuravida, Condylarthra,
+Esthonychida, and Ictopsida. These are the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</a></span>
+four ancestral groups of the four main orders
+of Placentalia&mdash;namely, of the Primates,
+Ungulata, Rodentia, and Carnassia. They
+seem to be so closely related by their primitive
+organization that they may be united in
+one common super-order, Prochoriata.</p>
+
+<p>With a considerable degree of probability,
+we are led to formulate the further
+hypothesis that all the orders of Placentalia&mdash;from
+the lowest Prochoriata upwards to
+man&mdash;have descended from some unknown
+common ancestor living in the Cretaceous
+period, and that this oldest placental form
+originated from some Jurassic group of
+marsupials.</p>
+
+<p>Among these numerous fossil Lemures
+which have been discovered within the last
+twenty years, there exist, indeed, all the connecting
+forms of the older series of Primates,
+all the 'missing links' sought for by comparative
+odontology.</p>
+
+<p>The oldest Lemures of the tertiary age
+are the Eocene Pachylemures, or Hyopso<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span>dina.
+They possess the complete dentition
+of the Prochoriata&mdash;namely, forty-four teeth
+(3.1.4.3/3.1.4.3). Then follow the Eocene Palæolemures,
+or Adapida, with forty teeth, they
+having lost one pair of incisors in each jaw.
+To these are attached the younger Autolemures,
+or Stenopida, with thirty-six teeth,
+they thus possessing already the same dentition
+as the Platyrrhinæ. The characteristic
+dentition of the Catarrhinæ is derived from
+this formula by the loss of another premolar.</p>
+
+<p>These relations are so clear and so closely
+connected with a gradual transformation of
+the whole skull, and with the progressive
+differentiation of the Primate-form, that we
+are justified in saying that the pedigree of the
+Primates, from the oldest Eocene Lemures
+upwards to man, is now so well known, its
+principal features so firmly fixed within the
+Tertiary age, that there is no missing link
+whatever.</p>
+
+<p>Quite different, and much more incom<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span>plete,
+is the palæontological evidence, if we
+go further back into the Secondary or Mesozoic
+age, and look there for the older ancestors
+of the mammalian series. There we
+meet everywhere with wide gaps, and the
+scarce fragments of fossil Mesozoic mammals
+(excessively rare in the Cretaceous formation)
+are too poor to permit definite conclusions as
+to their systematic position. Indeed, comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny lead us to the
+hypothesis that the oldest Cretaceous Mammalia&mdash;the
+Prochoriata&mdash;are descended from
+Jurassic marsupials, and these again from
+Monotremes. We may also suppose with
+high probability that among the unknown
+Cretaceous Prochoriata there have been
+Lemuravida and forms intermediate between
+these and the Jurassic Amphitheriidæ, and
+that these marsupials in their turn are descendants
+of Pantotheria or similar monotreme-like
+creatures of the Triassic age. Any
+certain evidence for these hypotheses is at
+present still wanting. One important fact,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span>
+however, is established&mdash;namely, that these
+interesting and oldest Mammalia&mdash;the Pantotheria
+of Marsh, the Triassic Dromatheriidæ,
+and the Jurassic Triconodontidæ of Osborn&mdash;were
+small insectivorous mammals with a very
+primitive organization. Probably they were
+Monotremes, and may be derived directly
+from Permian Sauromammalia, an ill-defined
+mixture of Mammalia and Reptilia.</p>
+
+<p>This generalized characteristic supports
+our view that <i>the whole class of Mammalia is
+monophyletic</i>, and that all its members, from
+the oldest Monotremes upwards to man, have
+descended from one common ancestor living
+in the older Triassic, or perhaps in the
+Permian, age. To acquire full conviction of
+this important conception, we have only to
+think of the hair and the glands of our
+human skin, of our diaphragm, the heart and
+the blood corpuscles without a nucleus, our
+skull with its squamoso-mandibular articulation.
+All these singular and striking modifications
+of the vertebrate organization are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span>
+common to mammals, and distinguish them
+clearly from the other Craniota. This characteristic
+combination and correlation proves
+that they have been developed only <i>once</i> in
+the history of the vertebrate stem, and that
+they have been transferred by heredity from
+one common ancestor to all the members of
+the class of Mammalia.</p>
+
+<p>The next step, as we trace our human
+phylogeny to its origin, leads us further back
+into the lower Vertebrata, into that obscure
+Palæozoic age the immeasurable length of
+which (much greater than that of the
+Mesozoic) may, according to one of the
+newest geological calculations, have comprised
+about one thousand millions of years.<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a></p>
+
+<p>The first important fact we have to face
+here is the complete absence of mammalian
+remains. Instead of these we find in the
+later Palæozoic period, the Permian, air-breathing
+<i>reptiles</i> as the earliest representatives
+of Amniota. They belong to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</a></span>
+most primitive order of that class, the
+Tocosauria; and besides them there were
+the Theromorpha, which approach the Mammalia
+in a remarkable manner. These
+reptiles in turn were preceded, in the Carboniferous
+period, by true Amphibia, most
+of them belonging to the armour-clad
+Stegocephali. These interesting Progonamphibia
+were the oldest Tetrapoda, the first
+vertebrates which had adapted themselves
+to the terrestrial mode of life; in them the
+swimming fin of fishes and Dipneusta was
+transformed into the pentadactyle extremities
+characteristic of quadrupeds.</p>
+
+<p>To appreciate the high importance of this
+metamorphosis, we need only compare the
+skeleton of our own human limbs with that
+of the living Amphibia. We find in the
+latter the same characteristic composition
+as in man: the same shoulder and pelvic
+girdle; the same single bone, the humerus
+or the femur, followed by the same pair of
+bones in the forearm and leg; then the same<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</a></span>
+skeletal elements composing the wrist and
+the ankle regions; and, lastly, the same five
+fingers and toes.</p>
+
+<p>The arrangement of these bones, peculiar
+and often complicated, but everywhere
+essentially the same in all the Tetrapoda,
+is a striking evidence that man is a
+descendant from the oldest pentadactyle
+Amphibia of the Carboniferous period. In
+man the pentadactyle type has been better
+preserved by constant heredity than in many
+other Mammalia, notably the Ungulata.</p>
+
+<p>The oldest Carboniferous Amphibia, the
+armour-clad Stegocephali, and especially the
+remarkable Branchiosauri discovered by
+Credner, are now regarded by all competent
+zoologists as the indubitable common ancestral
+group of all Tetrapoda, comprising both
+Amphibia and Amniota. But whence this
+most remote group of Tetrapoda? That
+difficult question is answered by the marvellous
+progress of modern palæontology, and
+the answer is in complete harmony with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</a></span>
+the older results arrived at by comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny. Thirty-four years
+ago Carl Gegenbaur,<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> the great living master
+of comparative anatomy, had demonstrated
+in a series of works how the skeletal
+parts of the various classes of Vertebrata,
+especially the skull and the limbs, still represent
+a continuous scale of phyletic gradations.
+Apart from the Cyclostomes, there are the
+fishes, and among them the Elasmobranchi
+(sharks and rays), which have best preserved
+the original structure in all its essential parts
+of organization. Closely connected with the
+Elasmobranchi are the Crossopterygii, and
+with these the Dipneusta or Dipnoi. Among
+the latter the highest importance attaches
+to the ancient Australian Ceratodus. Its
+organization and development is now, at
+last, becoming well known. This transitional
+group of Dipnoi, 'fishes with lungs'
+but without pentadactyle limbs, is the
+morphological bridge which joins the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</a></span>
+Ganoids and the oldest Amphibia. With
+this chain of successive groups of Vertebrata,
+constructed anatomically, the palæontological
+facts agree most satisfactorily.
+Selachians and Ganoids existed in the
+Silurian times, Dipnoi in the Devonian,
+Amphibia in the Carboniferous, Reptilia in
+the Permian, Mammalia in the Trias. These
+are historical facts of first rank. They
+connote in the most convincing manner that
+remarkable ascending scale in the series of
+vertebrates for our knowledge of which we
+are indebted to the works of Cuvier and
+Blainville, Meckel, Johannes Mueller and
+Gegenbaur, Owen and Huxley. The historical
+succession of the classes and orders
+of the Vertebrata in the course of untold
+millions of years is definitely fixed by the
+concordance of those leading works, and this
+invaluable acquisition is much more important
+for the foundation of our human
+pedigree than would be a complete series of
+all possible skeletons of Primates.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Greater and more frequent difficulties
+arise if we penetrate further into the most
+remote part of the human phylogeny, and
+attempt to derive the vertebrate stem from
+an older stem of invertebrate ancestors.
+None of those had a skeleton which could be
+petrified; and the same remark applies to
+the lowest classes of Vertebrata&mdash;to the
+Cyclostomes and the Acrania. Palæontology,
+therefore, can tell us nothing about them;
+and we are limited to the other two great
+documents of phylogeny&mdash;the results of comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny. The value
+of their evidence is, however, so great that
+every competent zoologist can perceive the
+most important features of the most remote
+portion of our phylogeny.</p>
+
+<p>Here the first place belongs to the invaluable
+results which modern comparative
+ontogeny has gained by the aid of the
+biogenetic law or the theory of recapitulation.
+The foundation-stones of vertebrate embryology
+had been laid by the works of Von<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</a></span>
+Baer, Bischoff,<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> Remak, and Koelliker;<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> but
+the clearest light was thrown upon it by the
+famous discoveries of Kowalevsky<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> in 1866.
+He proved the identity of the first developmental
+stages of Amphioxus and
+the Ascidians, and thereby confirmed the
+divination of Goodsir, who had already
+announced the close affinity of Vertebrates
+and Tunicates. The acknowledgment of
+this affinity has proved of increasing importance,
+and has abolished the erroneous
+hypothesis that the Vertebrata may have
+arisen from Annelids or from other Articulata.
+Meanwhile, from 1860 to 1872, I
+myself had been studying the development
+of the Spongiæ, Medusæ, Siphonophora, and
+other C&oelig;lenterata. Their comparison led
+me to the statements embodied in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</a></span>
+'Gastræatheorie,' the first abstract of which
+was published in 1872 in my monograph of
+the Calcispongiæ.</p>
+
+<p>These ideas were carried on and expanded
+during the subsequent ten years by
+the help of many excellent embryologists&mdash;first
+of all by E. Ray Lankester and Francis
+Balfour. The most fruitful result of these
+widely extended researches was the conclusion
+that the first stages of embryonic
+development are essentially the same in all
+the different Metazoa, and that we may
+derive from these facts certain views on the
+common descent of all from one ancestral
+form. The unicellular egg<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> repeats the stage
+of our Protozoan ancestors; the Blastula is
+equivalent to an ancestral c&oelig;nobium of
+Magosphæra or Volvox; the Gastrula is
+the hereditary repetition of the Gastræa, the
+common ancestor of all the Metazoa.</p>
+
+<p>Man agrees in all these respects with the
+other vertebrates, and must have descended
+with them from the same common root.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Particularly obscure is that part of our
+phylogeny which extends from the Gastræa
+to Amphioxus. The morphological importance
+of this last small creature had been
+perceived by Johannes Mueller, who in 1842
+gave the first accurate description of it. It
+would not, of course, be correct to proclaim
+the modern Amphioxus the common ancestor
+of all the vertebrates; but he must be regarded
+as closely related to them, and as the only
+survivor of the whole class of Acrania. If
+the Amphioxidæ had through some unfortunate
+accident become extinct, we should
+not have been able to gain anything like a
+positive glimpse at our most remote vertebrate
+ancestor. On the one hand, Amphioxus is
+closely connected with the early larva of the
+Cyclostomes, which are the oldest Craniota,
+and the pre-Silurian ancestors of the fishes.
+On the other hand, the ontogeny of Amphioxus
+is in harmony with that of the Ascidians,
+and if this agreement is not merely coincidental,
+but due to relationship, we are
+justified in reconstructing for both Ascidians<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</a></span>
+and Amphioxus one common ancestral group
+of chordate animals, the hypothetical <i>Prochordonia</i>.
+The modern Copelata give us
+a remote idea of their structure. The curious
+Balanoglossus, the only living form of Enteropneusta,
+seems to connect these Prochordonia
+with the Nemertina and other Vermalia,
+which we unite in one large class&mdash;Frontonia.</p>
+
+<p>No doubt these pre-Cambrian Vermalia,
+and the common root of all Metazoa, the
+Gastræades, were connected during the
+Laurentian period by a long chain of intermediate
+forms, and probably among these
+were some older forms of Rotatoria and
+Turbellaria; but at present it is not possible
+to fill this wide gap with hypotheses that
+are satisfactory, and we have to admit that
+here indeed are many missing links in the
+older history of the Invertebrata. Still,
+every zoologist who is convinced of the truth
+of transformism, and is accustomed to phylogenetic
+speculations, knows very well that
+their results are most unequal, often incomplete.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>III.</h2>
+
+
+<p>Let us now recapitulate the ancestral chain
+of man, as it is set forth in the accompanying
+diagram (p. <a name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_55" class="label">55</a>), which represents our present
+knowledge of our descent. For simplicity's
+sake the many side-issues or branches which
+lead to groups not in the main line of our
+descent have been left out, or have been indicated
+merely. Many of the stages are of
+course hypothetical, arrived at by the study
+of comparative anatomy and ontogeny; but
+an example for each of them has been taken
+from those living or fossil creatures which
+seem to be their nearest representatives.</p>
+
+<p>1. The most remote ancestors of all living
+organisms were living beings of the simplest
+imaginable kind, organisms without organs,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</a></span>
+like the still existing <i>Monera</i>. Each consisted
+of a simple granule of protoplasm, a
+structureless mass of albuminous matter or
+plasson, like the recent Chromaceæ and
+Bacteriæ. The morphological value of these
+beings is not yet that of a cell, but that of a
+cytode, or cell without a nucleus. Cytoplasm
+and nucleus were still undifferentiated.</p>
+
+<p>I assume that the first Monera owe their
+existence to spontaneous creation out of so-called
+anorganic combinations, consisting of
+carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. An
+explanation of this hypothesis I have given
+in my 'Generelle Morphologie.'</p>
+
+<p>The Monera probably arose early in the
+Laurentian period. The oldest are the
+Phytomonera, with vegetable metabolism.
+They possessed the power (characteristic of
+plants) of forming albumin by synthesis from
+carbon, water, and ammonia. From some of
+these plasma-forming Monera arose the
+plasmophagous Zoomonera with animal metabolism,
+living directly upon the produce of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</a></span>
+their plasmodomous or plasma-forming
+sisters. This is the first instance of the
+great principle of division of labour.</p>
+
+<p>2. The second stage is that of the <i>simple
+and single cell</i>, a bit of protoplasm with a
+nucleus. Such unicellular organisms are
+still very common. The <i>Am&oelig;bæ</i> are their
+simplest representatives. The morphological
+value of such beings is the same as that of
+the egg of any animal. The naked egg cells
+of the sponges creep about in an am&oelig;boid
+fashion, scarcely distinguishable from Am&oelig;ba.
+The same remark applies to the egg-cell of
+man himself in its early stages before it is
+enclosed in a membrane. The first unicellular
+organisms arose from Monera through differentiation
+of the inner nucleus from the outer
+protoplasm.</p>
+
+<p>3. Repeated division of the unicellular
+organism produces the <i>Synam&oelig;bium</i>, or
+community of Am&oelig;bæ, provided the divisional
+products, or new generations of the
+original cell, do not scatter, but remain<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</a></span>
+together. The existence of such a <i>C&oelig;nobium</i>,
+a number of equal and only loosely-connected
+cells, as a separate stage in the ancestral
+history of animals, is made highly probable by
+the fact that the eggs of all animals undergo
+after fertilization such a process of repeated
+self-division, or 'cleavage,' until the single
+egg cell is transformed into a heap of cells
+closely packed together, not unlike a mulberry
+(<i>morula</i>)&mdash;hence <i>morula</i> stage in ontogeny.</p>
+
+<p>4. The morula of most animals further
+changes into a <i>Blastula</i>, a hollow ball filled
+with fluid, the wall being formed by a single
+layer of cells, the blastoderm or germinal layer.
+This modification is brought about by the
+action of the cells&mdash;they conveying nourishing
+fluid into the interior of the whole cell
+colony and thereby being themselves forced
+towards the surface. The Blastula of most
+Invertebrata, and even that of Amphioxus, is
+possessed of fine ciliæ, or hair-like processes,
+the vibrating motion of which causes the
+whole organism to rotate and advance in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span>
+the water. Living representatives of such
+Blastæads, namely, globular gelatinous
+colonies of cells enclosing a cavity, are
+Volvox and Magosphæra.</p>
+
+<p>5. The Blastula of most animals assumes
+a new larval form called <i>Gastrula</i>, in which
+the essential characteristics are that a portion
+of the blastoderm by invagination converts
+the Blastula into a cup with double walls,
+enclosing a new cavity, the primitive gut.
+This invagination or bulging-in obliterates
+the original inner cavity of the Blastula.
+The outer layer of the Gastrula is the ectoderm,
+the inner the endoderm; both pass
+into each other at the blastoporus, or opening
+of the gut cavity. The Gastrula is a stage
+in the embryonic development of the various
+great groups of animals, and some such
+primitive form as ancestral to all Metazoa is
+thus indicated. This hypothetical <i>Gastræa</i>
+is still very essentially represented by the
+lower C&oelig;lenterates&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Olynthus, Hydra.</p>
+
+<p>6. The sixth stage&mdash;that of the <i>Platodes</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</a></span>
+or flat-worms&mdash;is very hypothetical. They
+are bilateral gastræads, with a flattened
+oblong body, furnished with ciliæ, with a
+primitive nervous system, simple sensory and
+reproductive organs, but still without appendages,
+body cavity, vent, and blood-vessels.
+The nearest living representatives of such
+creatures are the ac&oelig;lous Turbellarians&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>,
+Convoluta, a free-swimming, ciliated creature.</p>
+
+<p>7. The next higher stage is represented
+by such low animals as the <i>Gastrotricha</i>&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>,
+Chætonotus among the Rotatoria, which
+differ from the rhabdoc&oelig;lous Turbellarians
+chiefly by the formation of a vent and the
+beginnings of a c&oelig;lom, or cavity, between
+gut and body wall. The addition of a primitive
+vascular system and a pair of nephridia,
+or excretory organs, is first met with in the
+<i>Nemertines</i>.</p>
+
+<p>8. These, together with the <i>Enteropneusta</i>
+(Balanoglossus), are comprised under the
+name of Frontonia, or Rhynchelminthes,
+and form the highest group of the Vermalia.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>The Enteropneusta especially fix our attention,
+because they alone, although essentially
+'worms,' exhibit certain characteristics which
+make it possible to bridge over the gulf
+which still separates the Invertebrata from
+the vertebrate phylum. The anterior portion
+of the gut is transformed into a breathing
+apparatus&mdash;hence Gegenbaur's term of Enteropneusta,
+or Gut-breathers. Moreover,
+Balanoglossus and Cephalodiscus possess
+another modification of the gut&mdash;namely, a
+peculiar diverticulum, which, in the present
+state of our knowledge, may be looked upon
+as the forerunner of the chorda dorsalis.</p>
+
+<p>9. Stage of <i>Prochordonia</i>, as indicated by
+the larval form, called Chordula, which is
+common to the Tunicata and all the Vertebrata.
+These two groups possess three most
+important features: (<i>a</i>) A chorda dorsalis,
+a stiff rod lying in the long axis of the
+body, dorsally from the gut and below the
+central nervous system. This latter, for the
+first time in the animal kingdom, appears in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</a></span>
+the shape of a spinal cord. (<i>b</i>) The use of
+the anterior portion of the gut for respiratory
+purposes. (<i>c</i>) The larval development of
+the Tunicata is essentially the same as that of
+the Vertebrata in its early stages. Only the
+free-swimming Copelata or Appendicularia
+among the Tunicates retain most of these
+features. The others, which become sessile&mdash;namely,
+the Ascidiæ, or sea-squirts&mdash;degenerate
+and specialize away from the
+main line.</p>
+
+<p class="center">
+<a name="Footnote_55_55" id="Footnote_55_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_55"><span class="label">ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE VERTEBRATA</span></a><br />
+<i>Abridged from 'Systemat. Phylogenie,' § 15.</i><br />
+Names underlined refer to hypothetical groups.</p>
+
+<table id="atv" summary="vertebrata">
+
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Aves</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Mammalia</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Reptilia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Proreptilia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Pisces</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Amphibia</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Stegocephali</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Dipnoi</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Proselachii</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>&nbsp;&nbsp; Cyclostomata</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<i>Tunicata</i> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdc"> <span class="u"><i>Archicrania</i></span></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i>Acrania</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><span class="u"><i>Prospondylia</i></span></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><span class="u"><i>Prochordonia</i>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>10. Stage of the <i>Acrania</i>, represented by
+Amphioxus. The early development of this
+little marine creature agrees closely with that
+of the Tunicates; but one important feature
+is added to its organization&mdash;namely, metamerism,
+segmentally arranged mesoderm.
+Amphioxus still possesses neither skull nor
+vertebræ, neither ribs nor jaws, and no limbs.
+But it is a member of the Vertebrata if we
+define these as follows: Bilateral symmetrical
+animals with segmentally arranged mesoderm,
+with a chorda dorsalis between the
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</a></span>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</a></span>
+tubular nervous system and the gut, and with
+respiratory organs which arise from the anterior
+portion of the gut. We do not assume
+that Amphioxus stands in the direct ancestral
+line; it is probably much specialized, partly
+degenerated, and represents a side-branch;
+but it is, nevertheless, the only creature,
+hitherto known, which satisfactorily connects
+the Vertebrata with their invertebrate ancestors.
+Many other efforts have been made to
+solve the mystery of the origin of the Vertebrata&mdash;all
+less satisfactory than the present
+suggestion, or even absolutely futile. This
+remark applies especially to the attempts
+to derive them from either Articulata or
+Echinoderms. The other great and highly
+developed phylum, the Mollusca, is quite
+out of the question. We have to go back to
+a level at which all these principal phyla
+meet, and there we find the Vermalia, the
+lower of which alone permit connection in an
+upward direction with the higher phyla.</p>
+
+<p>11. Stage of <i>Cyclostomata</i>. This now<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</a></span>
+small group of Lampreys and Hagfishes
+represents the lowest Craniota; and although
+much specialized as a side-branch of the
+main-stem from which the other Craniota
+have sprung, they give us an idea of what
+the direct ancestors of the latter must have
+been like:&mdash;still without visceral arches,
+without jaws and without paired limbs; with
+a persistent pronephros; the ear with one
+semicircular canal only; mouth suctorial;
+cranium very primitive; and the metamerism
+of the vertebral column indicated only by
+little blocks of cartilage in the perichordal
+sheath. Such creatures must have existed
+at least as early as the Lower Silurian
+epoch; but until 1890 fossil Cyclostomes were
+unknown. Their life in the mud, or as
+endoparasites of fishes, coupled with their
+soft structure, makes them very unfit for
+preservation. This gives all the greater importance
+to Traquair's discovery, in 1890, of
+many little creatures, called by him <i>Palæospondylus
+gunni</i>, in the Old Red Sandstone of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</a></span>
+Caithness, which seem to be very closely
+allied to Cyclostomata.</p>
+
+<p>12. The <i>Elasmobranchi</i> (sharks and skates),
+with their immediate forerunners, the Acanthodi
+of the Devonian and Carboniferous age,
+are the first typical fishes. That they existed
+as far back as the Silurian age is proved by
+many enamelled spines of the dermal armour,
+chiefly from the dorsal fins. This higher
+stage is characterized by the possession of
+typical jaws, by visceral or gill-bearing arches,
+and by two pairs of limbs. None of the
+Elasmobranchs, fossil or recent, stands in the
+direct ancestral line; but they are the lowest
+Gnathostomata, jaw-and-limb-possessing
+creatures, known.</p>
+
+<p>13. Closely connected with the Elasmobranchs
+in a wider sense are the <i>Crossopterygii</i>,
+which begin in the Devonian age as a
+large group, but have left only two survivals,
+the African Polypterus and Calamoichthys.
+They are possessed of dermal bones and
+other ossifications, and are characterized by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</a></span>
+their lobate paired fins, which have a thick
+axis beset with biserial fin rays. Their gill-clefts
+are covered by an operculum, and they
+have a well-developed air-bladder. Whilst
+they are in many respects more highly
+developed than the Elasmobranchs, and are
+intimately connected with the typical Ganoids
+and other bony fishes (all of which form a
+great, manifold side-branch of the general
+vertebrate stem), they stand in many other
+respects (notably, the structure of the paired
+fins, the vertebral column, and the air-bladder)
+nearer the main-stem of our own
+ancestral line.</p>
+
+<p>14. This is shown by their intimate
+relation to the <i>Dipnoi</i>, which are still represented
+by the Australian, African, and South
+American mud-fishes: Ceratodus, Protopterus,
+and Lepidosiren. The genus Ceratodus
+existed in the Upper Trias, whence various
+other unmistakably dipnoous forms lead down
+through the Carboniferous (<i>e.g.</i>, Ctenodus)
+to the Devonian strata&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Dipterus. They<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</a></span>
+are characterized as follows: The paired fins
+still retain the archipterygial form (namely,
+one axis with biserial rays); the heart is
+already trilocular, and receives blood which
+is mixed arterial and venous, owing to the
+gills being retained, while the air-bladder has
+been modified into a lung. In fact, the
+generalized Dipnoi form the actual link between
+fishes and <i>Amphibia</i>.</p>
+
+<p>15. <i>Amphibia.</i> The earliest amphibian
+fossils occur in the Carboniferous strata.
+They alone&mdash;the Stegocephali or Phractamphibia&mdash;stand
+in the ancestral line, while the
+Lissamphibia, to which all the recent forms
+belong, are side-branches. The Stegocephali
+are the earliest Tetrapoda, the archipterygial
+paired fins having been transformed into
+the pentadactyle fore and hind limbs, which
+are so characteristic of all the higher Vertebrata.
+The cranium is roofed over by dermal
+bones, of which, besides others, supra-occipitals,
+supra-orbitals, and supra-temporals
+are always present. The lowest members<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</a></span>
+(Branchiosauri) still retained gills besides
+the lungs, while others (Microsauri) have
+lost the gills. Be it remembered that all the
+recent Amphibia still undergo the same metamorphosis
+during their ontogenetic development.</p>
+
+<p>In the very important Temnospondyli, a
+subgroup of the Stegocephali&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Trimerorhachis
+of the Lower Red Sandstone or Lower
+Permian&mdash;the component cartilaginous or
+bony units which compose the vertebræ still
+remained in a separate, unfused state, showing
+at the same time an arrangement whence
+has arisen that which is typical of the Amniota.
+The same applies to the limbs and
+their girdles. In fact, the Stegocephali, taken
+as a whole, lead imperceptibly to the <i>Proreptilia</i>.</p>
+
+<p>16. <i>Proreptilia</i> are represented by the
+Permian genera Eryops and Cricotus. Until
+quite recently these and many other fossils
+from the Carboniferous strata were looked
+upon as Amphibia, while many undoubted<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</a></span>
+fossil Amphibia were mistaken for reptiles,
+as indicated by the frequent termination
+'-saurus' in their names.</p>
+
+<p>The nearest living representative of these
+extinct Proreptilia is the New Zealand
+reptile Hatteria, or Sphenodon, close relations
+of which are known from the Upper Trias;
+while others&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Palæohatteria&mdash;have been
+discovered in the Permian. Anyhow, Sphenodon
+is the reptile which stands nearest to the
+main stem of our ancestry.</p>
+
+<p>The most important characteristics of the
+Reptilia, which mark a higher stage or level,
+are (1) The entire suppression of the gills&mdash;although
+during the embryonic development
+the gill-clefts still appear in all reptiles, birds,
+and mammals; (2) The development of an
+amnion and an allantois, both for the embryonic
+life only, but so characteristic that all
+these animals are comprised under the name
+of Amniota; (3) The articulation of the skull
+with the first neck vertebræ by well-developed
+condyles, either single (really triple) or<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</a></span>
+double (such a condylar arrangement begins
+with the Amphibia, but only the two lateral
+condyles are developed, while the middle
+portion, belonging to the basi-occipital element,
+remains rudimentary<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a>); (4) The formation
+of centra, or bodies of the vertebræ,
+mainly by a ventral pair of the original quadruple
+constituents, or arcualia.</p>
+
+<p>17. Between the Proreptilia and the Mammalia,
+which latter occur in the Upper Triassic
+epoch, we have necessarily to intercalate a
+group of very low reptiles, which are still so
+generalized that their descendants could
+branch off either into the Reptilia proper or
+into the Mammalia. The changes concerned
+chiefly the brain and the heart; of the skele<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span>ton,
+the skull and the pelvis; and, of the
+tegumentary structures, the formation of a
+hairy covering. Many such creatures existed
+in the Triassic epoch&mdash;namely, the <i>Theromorpha</i>&mdash;some
+of which indeed possess so
+many characteristics which otherwise occur
+in the Mammalia only, that these creatures
+have been termed <i>Sauro-Mammalia</i>. However,
+it has to be emphasized that none of
+the Theromorpha hitherto discovered fulfils
+all the requirements which would entitle them
+to this important linking position. They only
+give us an approximate idea of what this link
+was like.</p>
+
+<p>18. Stage of the <i>Promammalia</i>, or <i>Prototheria</i>.
+The only surviving members are
+the famous duck-bill, Ornithorhynchus, and
+the spiny ant-eaters, Echidna and Proechidna,
+of the Australian region. These few genera,
+however, differ so much from one another in
+various important respects that they cannot
+but be remnants of an originally much larger
+group. Indeed, many fossils from the Upper<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</a></span>
+Triassic and from the Jurassic strata have
+without much doubt to be referred to the
+Prototheria. The Prototheria are typical
+mammals, because they possess the following
+characteristics: The heart is completely
+quadrilocular; the blood is warm, and its red
+corpuscles have, owing to the loss of their
+nucleus, been modified from biconvex into
+biconcave discs; they have a hairy coat and
+sweat glands, and two occipital condyles; the
+ilio-sacral connection is preacetabular; the
+ankle-joint is cruro-tarsal; the quadrate bone
+of the Reptilia has ceased to carry the under
+jaw, which now articulates directly with the
+squamosal portion of the skull. Their low
+position is shown by the retention of the
+following reptilian features: Complete coracoid
+bones and a T-shaped interclavicle; a
+cloaca, or common chamber for the passage
+of the fæces, the genital and the urinary products;
+they are still oviparous; the embryo
+develops without a chorion, and is therefore
+not nourished through a placenta. Even the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</a></span>
+milk glands, which are absolutely peculiar to
+the Mammalia, are still in a very primitive
+stage, and do not yet produce milk proper;
+and there is only a temporary shallow marsupium.</p>
+
+<p>19. Stage of <i>Metatheria</i>, or <i>Marsupialia</i>,
+are direct descendants of Prototheria; but
+they show higher development by the reduction
+of the coracoid bones and the interclavicle.
+The original cloaca is divided into
+a rectal chamber and a uro-genital sinus, completely
+separated, at least in the males; they
+are viviparous; the young are received into
+a permanent marsupium, in the walls of which
+are formed typical milk glands and nipples,
+but the embryo is still devoid of a placenta,
+although some recent marsupials show indications
+of such an organ. The corpus callosum
+in the brain is still very weak.</p>
+
+<p>Most of the marsupials are extinct. They
+occur from the Upper Trias onwards, and
+had in the Jurassic epoch attained a wide
+distribution both in Europe and in America.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</a></span>
+Since the Tertiary epoch they have been
+restricted to America and to the Australian
+region, and are now represented by about 150
+species.</p>
+
+<p>20. Stage of <i>Prochoriata</i>, or early <i>Placentalia</i>:
+a further development of the Metatheria
+by the development of a placenta, loss
+of the marsupium and the marsupial bones,
+complete division by the perineum of the
+anal and uro-genital chambers, stronger
+development of the corpus callosum, or chief
+commissure of the two hemispheres of the
+brain.</p>
+
+<p>Placentalia must have come into existence
+during the Cretaceous epoch. Up to that
+time all the Mammalia seem to have
+belonged to either Prototheria or to Metatheria;
+but in the early Eocene we can
+distinguish the main groups of Placentalia&mdash;namely,
+(1) Trogontia, now represented by
+the rodents; (2) Edentata, or sloths, armadilloes,
+etc.; (3) Carnassia, or Insectivora
+and Carnivora; (4) Chiroptera, or bats;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</a></span>
+(5) Cetomorpha, or whales and dugongs;
+(6) Ungulata; (7) Primates. Of these
+groups, the first and second, third and fourth,
+fifth and sixth, can perhaps, to judge from
+palæontological evidence, be combined into
+three greater groups, as indicated by the
+fossil Esthonychida, Ictopsida, and Condylarthra,
+in addition to the ancestral Primates,
+or Lemuravida, as the fourth large branch of
+the ancestral-tree where this has reached the
+placental level. Among none of the first
+three branches can we look for the ancestors
+of the Primates. The Lemuravida, therefore,
+represent a branch equivalent to the three
+other branches.</p>
+
+<p>21. Stage of <i>Lemures</i>, or <i>Prosimiæ</i>, comprising
+the older members of the Primates,
+consequently approaching most nearly to the
+Lemuravida. The limbs are modified into
+pentadactyle hands and feet of the arboreal
+type, and are protected by nails. The dentition
+is of the frugivorous or omnivorous type,
+with an originally complete series of teeth,</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>with milk teeth and with permanent. The
+orbit is surrounded by a complete bony ring,
+posteriorly by a fronto-jugal arch, but still
+widely communicating with the temporal
+fossa. The placenta is diffuse and non-deciduous.</p>
+<p class= "center">
+ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE MAMMALIA.<br />
+
+<i>'Systematische Phylogenie,' § 386.</i></p>
+
+<table id="atm" summary="mammalia" cellspacing="0">
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Perissodactyla</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc" ></td>
+ <td class="tdc" ><i>Homo</i></td>
+ <td class="tdc" ></td>
+ <td class="tdc" ><small><i>Carnivora</i></small></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"><i><small>Artiodactyla</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">(<i><small>Litopterna</small></i>)</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">&nbsp;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small><i>Pinnipedia</i></small></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Anthropoidae</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Catarhinæ</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small><i>Carnassia</i></small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;,</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Chiroptera</small></i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>(<i>Amblypoda</i>)</small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Proboscidea</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Platyrhinæ</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Insectivora</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">'&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Simiæ</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><small><i>Cetacea</i></small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Sirenia</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Lemures</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Rodentia</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Cetomorpha</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Hyracoidea</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr"><i><span class="u"><small>Ictopsales</small></span></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">(<i><small>Tillodontia</small></i>)</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><span class="u"><small>Lemuravidæ</small></span></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Trogontia</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Edentata</small></i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><span class="u"><small>Condylarthrales</small></span></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><span class="u"><small>Esthonychales</small></span></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">'&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&mdash;&mdash;|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan="7">Eutheria s. Placentalia</td>
+ </tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan="3"><i><small>Marsupialia diprotodontia</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan="3"><i><small>Marsupialia polyprotodontia</small></i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan="7">Metatheria</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"><i><small>Monotremata</small></i></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>(<i>Allotheria</i>)</small></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">Prototheria</td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc">|</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdr">|&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&mdash;&mdash;'</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc" colspan ="7"><i><span class="u"><small>Hypotheria s. Promammalia</small></span></i></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<p>
+<i>Names in brackets indicate extinct groups.<br />
+Names <span class="u">underlined</span> indicate hypothetical groups or combinations.</i><br />
+</p>
+
+<p>22. Stage of <i>Simiæ</i>. Orbit completely
+separated from the temporal fossa by an
+inward extension of the frontal and malar
+bones meeting the alisphenoid. Placenta consolidated
+into a disc, and with a maternal
+deciduous portion. Mammæ pectoral only.
+The dental formula is 2.1.3.3. All the
+fingers and toes are protected by flat nails.
+The tail is long. The American prehensile-tailed
+monkeys are a lower side-branch.</p>
+
+<p>23. Stage of <i>Catarrhinæ Cercopithecidæ</i>.
+The dental formula is 2.1.2.3, owing to the
+loss of one pair of premolars in each jaw.
+The frontal and alisphenoid bones are in
+contact, separating the parietal from the
+malar bone; this feature is correlated with
+the enlarged brain. The internarial septum<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</a></span>
+is narrow, and the nostrils look forwards and
+downwards instead of sidewards&mdash;hence the
+term 'Catarrhinæ.' The external auditory
+meatus is long and bony. The tail is long,
+with the exception of <i>Macacus inuus</i>. The
+body is covered with a thick coat of furry
+hair. Catarrhine monkeys have existed, we
+know with certainty, since the Miocene.</p>
+
+<p>24. Stage of <i>Catarrhinæ Anthropoidæ</i>, or
+<i>Apes</i>. Now represented by the large apes&mdash;namely,
+the Hylobates or gibbon of South-Eastern
+Asia, <i>Simia satyrus</i>, the orang-utan
+of Sumatra and Borneo, <i>Troglodytes gorilla</i>,
+<i>T. niger</i> and <i>T. calvus</i>, the gorilla and the
+chimpanzees from Western Equatorial Africa.
+Of fossils are to be mentioned Pliopithecus
+and Dryopithecus from European Miocene,
+and <i>Troglodytes sivalensis</i> from the Pliocene
+of the Punjaub. The tail is reduced to a
+few caudal vertebræ, which are transformed
+into a coccyx, not visible externally; but in
+the embryos of apes and man the tail is still
+a conspicuous feature. The walk is semi<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</a></span>erect;
+in adaptation to the prevailing arboreal
+life, the arms are longer than the legs.
+The hair of the body is considerably more
+scanty than in the tailed monkeys. <i>Troglodytes
+calvus</i>, a species or variety of chimpanzee,
+is bald-headed. None of the recent
+genera of apes can lay claim to a place in
+the ancestry of mankind.</p>
+
+<p>25. Stage of <i>Pithecanthropi</i>. Hitherto the
+only known representative is <i>Pithecanthropus
+erectus</i>, from the Upper Pliocene of Java. In
+adaptation to a more erect gait, the legs have
+become stronger and the hind-hand has been
+turned into a flat-soled walking 'foot.' The
+brain is considerably enlarged. Presumably
+it is still devoid of so-called articulate speech;
+this is indicated by the fact that children
+have to learn the language of their parents,
+and by the circumstance that comparative
+philology declares it impossible to reduce the
+chief human languages to anything like one
+common origin.</p>
+
+<p>26. <i>Man.</i> Known with certainty to have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</a></span>
+existed as an implement-using creature in the
+last Glacial epoch. His probable origin
+cannot, therefore, have been later than the
+beginning of the Plistocene. The place of
+origin was probably somewhere in Southern
+Asia.</p>
+
+<p>Whilst we have to admit that there are
+great defects in the older (invertebrate)
+portion of our pedigree, we have all the more
+reason to be satisfied with the positive results
+of our investigation of the more recent (vertebrate)
+part of it. All modern researches have
+confirmed the views of Lamarck, Darwin, and
+Huxley, and they allow of no doubt that the
+nearest vertebrate ancestors of mankind were
+a series of Tertiary Primates.</p>
+
+<p>Particularly valuable are the admirable
+attempts of the two zoologists, Paul and Fritz
+Sarasin,<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> to throw light upon the human
+phylogeny by painstaking comparison of all
+the skeletal parts of man with those of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span>
+anthropoid apes. They have shown that
+among the lower races of man the primitive
+Veddahs of Ceylon approach the apes most
+nearly, and that among the latter the chimpanzee
+stands nearest to man.</p>
+
+<p>The direct descent of man from some
+extinct ape-like form is now beyond doubt,
+and admits of being traced much more clearly
+than the origin of many another mammalian
+order. The pedigrees of the Elephants,
+the Sirenia, the Cetacea, and, above all, of
+the Edentata, for example, are much more
+obscure and difficult to explain. In many
+parts of their organization&mdash;for example, in
+the number and structure of his five digits and
+toes&mdash;man and monkeys have remained much
+more primitive than most of the Ungulata.</p>
+
+<p>The immense significance of this positive
+knowledge of the origin of man from some
+Primate does not require to be enforced. Its
+bearing upon the highest questions of philosophy
+cannot be exaggerated. Among modern
+philosophers no one has perceived this more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</a></span>
+deeply than Herbert Spencer.<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> He is one of
+those older thinkers who before Darwin were
+convinced that the theory of development
+is the only way to solve the 'enigma of the
+world.' Spencer is also the champion of those
+evolutionists who lay the greatest weight
+upon <i>progressive heredity</i>, or the much combated
+<i>heredity of acquired characters</i>. From
+the first he has severely attacked and criticised
+the theories of Weismann, who denies
+this most important factor of phylogeny, and
+would explain the whole of transformism by
+the 'all-sufficiency of selection.' In England
+the theories of Weismann were received with
+enthusiastic acclamation, much more so than
+on the Continent, and they were called 'Neo-Darwinism,'
+in opposition to the older conception
+of Evolution, or 'Neo-Lamarckism.'
+Neither of those expressions is correct.
+Darwin himself was convinced of the fundamental
+importance of progressive heredity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</a></span>
+quite as much as his great predecessor
+Lamarck; as were also Huxley and Spencer.</p>
+
+<p>Three times I had the good fortune to
+visit Darwin at Down, and on each occasion
+we discussed this fundamental question in
+complete harmony. I agree with Spencer
+in the conviction that progressive heredity is
+an indispensable factor in every true monistic
+theory of Evolution, and that it is one of its
+most important elements. If one denies
+with Weismann the heredity of acquired
+characters, then it becomes necessary to have
+recourse to purely mystical qualities of germ-plasm.
+I am of the opinion of Spencer, that
+in that case it would be better to accept a
+mysterious creation of all the various species
+as described in the Mosaic account.</p>
+
+<p>If we look at the results of modern anthropogeny
+from the highest point of view, and
+compare all its empirical arguments, we are
+justified in affirming that <i>the descent of man
+from an extinct Tertiary series of Primates
+is not a vague hypothesis, but an historical fact</i>.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Of course, this fact cannot be proved
+<i>exactly</i>. We cannot explain all the innumerable
+physical and chemical processes,
+all the physiological mutations, which have
+led during untold millions of years from the
+simplest Monera and from the unicellular
+Protista upwards to the chimpanzee and to
+man. But the same consideration applies to
+all historical facts. We all believe that
+Aristotle, Cæsar, and King Alfred did live;
+but it is impossible to give a proof within
+the meaning of modern exact science. We
+believe firmly in the former existence of
+these and other great heroes of thought,
+because we know well the works they have
+left behind them, and we see their effects in
+the history of human culture. These indirect
+arguments do not furnish stronger evidence
+than those of our history as vertebrates.
+We know of many Jurassic mammals only
+a single bone, the under jaw. We all
+believe that these mammals possessed also
+an upper jaw, a skull, and other bones. But<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</a></span>
+the so-called 'exact school,' which regards
+the transformation of species as a hypothesis
+not proven, must suppose that the
+mandibula was the only bone in the body of
+these curious animals.</p>
+
+<p>Looking forward to the twentieth century,
+I am convinced that it will universally accept
+our theory of descent, and that future science
+will regard it as the greatest advance made
+in our time. I have no doubt that the
+influence of the study of anthropogeny upon
+all other branches of science will be fruitful
+and auspicious. The work done in the
+present century by Lamarck and Darwin
+will in all future times be considered one
+of the greatest conquests made by thinking
+man.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</a></span></p>
+
+<p class="center">EVOLUTIONARY STAGES OF THE PRINCIPAL
+GROUPS OF VERTEBRATA.<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> </p>
+<table id="esv" summary="stages">
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>STAGES OF THE</small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small> CLASSES.</small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>STAGES OF THE HEART.</small></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdc"><small>PAIRED LIMBS.</small></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+ <td class="tdc"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{1. <i>Acrania.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">I. <i>Leptocardia.</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">I. <i>Adactylia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Cold-blooded; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;s. <i>Impinnata</i>.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;with one chamber;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Without jaws</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;without lungs.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;and limbs.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{2. <i>Cyclostomata.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}II. <i>Ichthyocardia.</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;Cold-blooded; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;two-chambered, with</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;one atrium and one</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;ventricle; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;containing venous</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">II. <i>Polydactylia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{3. <i>Pisces.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;blood only; without lungs</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;s. <i>Pinnata</i>.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;With two</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;pairs of fins.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{ 4. <i>Dipnoi.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}III. <i>Amphicardia.</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;}Cold-blooded; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;with three complete</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;chambers, namely, with</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;two atria and one</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{ 5. <i>Amphibia.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">} ventricle, or (Reptilia)</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;two ventricles with still</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;incomplete septum; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;containing mixed venous</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;and arterialized</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">III. <i>Pentadactylia</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{ 6. <i>Reptilia.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;blood; with lungs.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;s. <i>Tetrapoda</i>.</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;With two</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{IV. <i>Thermocardia.</i></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;pairs of</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;Warm-blooded; heart</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp; pentadactyle</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;with four complete</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;limbs (unless</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{7. <i>Aves.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;chambers, namely, two</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;they have</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;auricles and two</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;been lost by</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;ventricles; right half</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;reduction).</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;of the heart with venous,</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{</td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;left half with arterialized,</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{8. <i>Mammalia.</i></td>
+ <td class="tdl">{&nbsp;blood; with lungs.</td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES</h2>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap"><a name="Footnote_40" id="Footnote_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40">Jean Baptiste de Monet</a>, Chevalier de
+<a name="Footnote_44" id="Footnote_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44">Lamarck</a></span>, was born on August 1, 1744, in
+Picardy, where his father owned land.
+Originally educated for the Church, he
+soon enlisted, and distinguished himself in
+active service. Owing to an accident affecting
+his health, the young Lieutenant gave
+up the military career, and, without means,
+studied medicine and natural sciences at
+Paris. In 1778 appeared his 'Flore française.'
+In 1793 he was appointed to a
+Chair of Zoology at the newly-formed Musée
+d'Histoire Naturelle. He had the misfortune
+to become gradually blind, and the last years
+of his life were spent amid straitened circumstances.
+He died in 1829.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>In 1794 Lamarck divided the whole animal
+kingdom into vertebrate and invertebrate
+animals, and founded successively the groups
+of Crustacea, Arachnida, Annelida, and
+Radiata. Between 1816 and 1822 he published
+his celebrated 'Histoire naturelle des
+Animaux sans Vertèbres.'</p>
+
+<p>His most famous work is the 'Philosophie
+zoologique,' 1809.</p>
+
+<p>Assuming the spontaneous origin of life,
+he propounded the doctrine that all animals
+and plants have arisen from low forms
+through incessant modifications and changes.
+In this respect he was in absolute opposition
+to Cuvier, who upheld the immutability of
+species, and did his best by absolute silence
+to suppress the spread of the new doctrine.</p>
+
+<p>Lamarck has explained his views of transformism
+chiefly in the seventh chapter of the
+first volume of his 'Philosophie zoologique.'</p>
+
+<p>Organisms strive to accommodate or adapt
+themselves to new circumstances, or to satisfy
+new requirements&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, climate, mode of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</a></span>
+procuring food, escape from enemies. The
+continued function of parts of an organism
+changes the old and produces new organs.
+The acquirements are inherited by the offspring,
+and thus are produced the more complicated
+from simpler organisms. Continued
+disuse brings about degeneration and ultimate
+loss of an organ.</p>
+
+<p>Lamarck consequently sees in the adaptability,
+or power of adaptation, which he
+assumes for all living matter the ultimate
+cause of variation; and, as he was certainly
+the first to point out that acquired characters
+are inherited by the progeny, he has given
+a working explanation of Evolution.</p>
+
+<p>But his doctrine did not spread&mdash;partly
+because he was misunderstood. His theory,
+that a new want, by making itself felt, exacts
+from the animal new exertions, perhaps from
+parts hitherto not used, until the want is
+satisfied&mdash;this way of putting it sounds too
+teleological to explain the yearned-for change
+in a mechanical or natural way. Moreover,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</a></span>
+many of his examples lacked the exact basis
+of experiment and observation necessary for
+their acceptance. Witness that of the neck of
+the giraffe,&mdash;a never-failing source of ridicule
+to men who cannot see the deeper purpose
+underlying the well-meant attempt at an explanation,
+which failed from want of complete
+knowledge of the intricate circumstances.</p>
+
+<p>However, the theory of transformism was,
+so to speak, in the air; and various authors
+have written on the subject, filling the gap
+between Lamarck and Darwin, especially
+Goethe, Treviranus, Leopold von Buch,
+and Herbert Spencer. But it is Darwin's
+immortal merit to have opened our eyes by
+his theory of natural selection, which is, at
+least, the first attempt to explain some of the
+causes and incidents of organic Evolution
+in a natural mechanical way. Moreover, he
+was the first clearly to express the fundamental
+principles of the theory of descent, to
+elaborate what had been at best a general
+sketch of an ill-defined problem, and to enter<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</a></span>
+into detail, supported by a host of painstaking
+observations, the making of which had
+taken him half a lifetime. Darwin, without
+going further than cursorily into the causes
+of variation, argued as follows: We know
+that variations do occur in every kind of
+living creatures. Some of these variations
+lead to something, while others do not. An
+enormously greater number of animals and
+plants are born than reach maturity and can
+in their turn continue the race. What is the
+regulating factor? His answer is, The
+struggle for existence&mdash;in other words, the
+weeding out of the less fit, or rather of the
+owners of those variations which are not so
+well adapted to their surroundings.</p>
+
+<p>For 'adapted' we had better read 'adaptable,'
+because a variation which does not
+answer, which cannot be made use of, or,
+still more notably, is a hindrance or disadvantage,
+does not become an adapted
+feature. There is often a confusion between
+adaptation as an accomplished fact, a feature,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</a></span>
+or resultant condition, and adaptation as the
+mode of fitting the organism to, or making
+the best of, the prevailing surroundings or
+circumstances.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire</span> was
+born in 1772 at Étampes, Seine-et-Oise.
+He was originally brought up for the Church;
+but when already ordained he attended
+lectures on natural science and medicine in
+Paris. He managed to get the place of
+assistant in the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle;
+he became Professor of Zoology in 1793, and
+took the opportunity of encouraging young
+Cuvier. Later he became Professor of
+Zoology of the Faculté des Sciences, and in
+1818 he published his remarkable 'Philosophie
+anatomique.' He died in 1844.</p>
+
+<p>He had conceived the 'unity of organic
+composition,' meaning that there is only one
+plan of construction,&mdash;the same principle, but
+varied in its accessory parts. In 1830, when
+Geoffroy proceeded to apply to the Inverte<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</a></span>brata
+his views as to the uniformity of
+animal composition, he found a vigorous
+opponent in Cuvier. Geoffroy, like Goethe,
+held that there is in Nature a law of compensation,
+or balancing of growth, so that if
+one organ take on an excess of development,
+it is at the expense of another part; and he
+maintained that, since Nature takes no
+sudden leaps, even organs which are superfluous
+in any given species, if they have
+played an important part in other species of
+the same family, are retained as rudiments,
+which testify to the permanence of the
+general plan of creation. It was his conviction
+that, owing to the conditions of life,
+the same forms had <i>not</i> been perpetuated
+since the origin of all things, although it was
+not his belief that existing species were becoming
+modified. Cuvier, on the other
+hand, maintained the absolute invariability
+of species, which, he declared, had been
+created with regard to the circumstances in
+which they were placed, each organ con<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</a></span>trived
+with a view to the function it had to
+fulfil,&mdash;thus putting the effect for the cause
+('Encyclopædia Britannica,' 9th edition,
+vol. xxi., p. 171).</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">George <a name="Footnote_46" id="Footnote_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46">Cuvier</a></span>
+in the department of Doubs, which
+at that time belonged to Württemberg. He
+was educated at Stuttgart, and studied
+political economy. While acting as private
+tutor to a French family in France he
+followed his favourite pursuit, the study of
+natural sciences. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire
+heard of him, and appointed him assistant in
+the department of comparative anatomy in the
+Musée d'Histoire Naturelle. In 1799 he was
+elected Professor of Natural History at the
+Collège de France, and soon after he became
+Perpetual Secretary of the Institut National.
+In 1831, a year before his death, Louis
+Philippe raised him to the rank of a peer of
+France.</p>
+
+<p>Cuvier was the first to indicate the true<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</a></span>
+principle upon which the natural classification
+of animals should be based&mdash;namely,
+their structure. It is the study of the
+anatomy of the creatures and their comparison
+which affords the only sound basis
+of a classification. The work which had the
+greatest influence upon the scientific public
+is his 'Règne animal distribué d'après son
+Organisation,' 1817. The system which he
+propounded in this book gradually came to
+have almost world-wide fame, and, in spite
+of its many obvious deficiencies, still lingers
+in some of our most recent text-books.</p>
+
+<p>A standard work is his 'Leçons d'Anatomie
+comparée,' and, in truth, he is the founder
+of that kind of comparative anatomy which
+was brought to such a high state by his
+pupil, the late Sir Richard Owen. Cuvier
+discovered the law of 'correlation of growth,'
+and was the first to apply this law to the
+reconstruction of animals from fragments:
+see his monumental work entitled 'Recherches
+sur les Ossemens fossiles,' 1812.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Cuvier, however, as a strict matter-of-fact
+man, was incapable of appreciating the speculative
+conclusions which were drawn by his
+contemporaries Saint-Hilaire and Lamarck.
+On the contrary, he firmly stuck to the
+doctrine of the immutability of species; and,
+in order to account for the existence of
+animals whose kind exists no longer, he invented
+the famous doctrine of successive
+cataclysms.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Karl Ernst <a name="Footnote_41" id="Footnote_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41">von Baer</a></span>
+was born in 1792
+in Esthonia, studied at Dorpat and then at
+Würzburg, where Döllinger introduced him
+to comparative anatomy. For a few years
+he was a <i>Privat-docent</i> at Berlin; then he
+went to Königsberg as Professor of Zoology
+and Embryology. In 1834 he became an
+Academician at St. Petersburg, where for
+many years he was occupied with the most
+varied studies, chiefly geographical and
+ethnological. The last years of his long,
+active life he spent in contemplative retire<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</a></span>ment
+on his paternal estate, and he died at
+Dorpat in 1876.</p>
+
+<p>While still at Würzburg he induced his
+friend Pander, a young man of means, to study
+the development of the chick; and Pander was
+the first to start the theory of the germinal
+layers from which all the organs arise.
+Baer, however, continued these researches in
+Königsberg, and after nine years' labour produced
+his epoch-making work, 'Ueber Entwicklungsgeschichte
+der Thiere: Beobachtung
+und Reflexion,' Königsberg, 1828. Nine
+years later he completed the second volume.
+He established upon a firm basis the theory
+of the germinal layers, and by further 'reflexions'
+arrived at the elucidation of some of
+the most fundamental laws of biology. For
+example, in the first volume he made the
+following prophetic statement: 'Perhaps all
+animals are alike, and nothing but hollow
+globes at their earliest developmental beginning.
+The farther back we trace their
+development, the more resemblance we find<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</a></span>
+in the most different creatures. And this
+leads to the question whether at the beginning
+of their development all animals are essentially
+alike, and referable to one common ancestral
+form. Considering that the "germ" (which
+at a certain stage appears in the shape of a
+hollow globe or bag) is the undeveloped animal
+itself, we are not without reason for assuming
+that the common fundamental form is that of a
+simple vesicle, from which every animal is
+evolved, not only theoretically, but historically.'</p>
+
+<p>This statement is all the more wonderful
+when we consider that the cells, the all-composing
+individual units, were not discovered
+until ten years later.</p>
+
+<p>In 1829 Baer discovered the human egg,
+and later the chorda dorsalis. In an address
+delivered in 1834, entitled 'The Most Universal
+Law of Nature in all Development,' he
+explained that only from a most superficial
+point of view can the various species be looked
+upon as permanent and immutable types;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</a></span>
+that, on the contrary, they can be nothing
+but passing stages, or series of stages, of
+development, which have been evolved by
+transformation out of common ancestral forms.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Johannes Mueller</span>, born at Coblenz in
+1801, established himself as <i>Privat-docent</i> at
+Bonn, where in 1830 he became Professor of
+Physiology. In 1833 he accepted the Chair
+of Anatomy and Physiology at Berlin, where
+he died in 1858.</p>
+
+<p>He was one of the most distinguished
+physiologists and comparative anatomists.
+By summarizing the labours and discoveries
+already made in the field of physiology, by
+reducing them to order, and abstracting the
+general principles, he became the founder of
+modern physiology. But he was scarcely
+less distinguished by his researches in
+comparative anatomy. His 'Vergleichende
+Anatomie der Myxinoiden,' in <i>Abhandlungen
+der Berliner Akademie</i>, 1835-45, and 'Ueber
+die Grenzen der Ganoiden' (<i>ibid.</i>, 1846), are
+standard works of lasting value.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Mueller exercised a stimulative influence
+as a teacher. Many well-known men&mdash;such
+as Helmholtz, Gegenbaur, Bruecke the physiologist,
+Guenther the zoologist, Virchow the
+pathologist, Koelliker and Haeckel&mdash;have
+been his pupils.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Rudolph <a name="Footnote_45" id="Footnote_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45">Virchow</a></span>
+Schievelbein, a small town in Eastern
+Pomerania. He studied medicine in Berlin
+as a pupil of Johannes Mueller, and went
+in 1849 to Würzburg, where, under the
+influence of Koelliker, and Leydig the pathologist,
+he laid the foundation of an entirely
+new branch of medical science&mdash;that of
+'cellular pathology.' Since 1856 he has
+filled the principal Chair of Pathology at
+Berlin. In 1892 he received the Copley
+medal of the Royal Society.</p>
+
+<p>'His contributions to the study of morbid
+anatomy have thrown light upon the diseases
+of every part of the body; but the broad
+and philosophical view he has taken of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</a></span>
+processes of pathology has done more than
+his most brilliant observations to make the
+science of disease.</p>
+
+<p>'In pathology, strictly so called, his two
+great achievements&mdash;the detection of the
+cellular activity which lies at the bottom of
+all morbid as well as normal physiological
+processes, and the classification of the important
+group of new growths on a natural
+histological basis&mdash;have each of them not
+only made an epoch in medicine, but have
+also been the occasion of fresh extension of
+science by other labourers' (Proc. Royal
+Soc., 1892).</p>
+
+<p>Virchow has not confined himself to
+medicine. He takes the keenest interest in
+anthropology and ethnology, on which subjects
+he has contributed many papers.
+Together with his colleagues Helmholtz the
+physicist, and Du Bois Reymond the physiologist,
+he has taken a leading place in the
+spreading of natural science; but, unfortunately,
+he did not take to the doctrine of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</a></span>
+Evolution, and for the last thirty years has
+been its declared antagonist, rarely missing
+an opportunity of denouncing everything but
+descriptive anatomy and zoology as the
+unsound speculations of dreamers. This has
+on more than one occasion brought him into
+sharp conflict with Haeckel. His activity is
+astonishing, especially if it be remembered that
+Virchow has for many years been one of the
+most conspicuous leaders of the Progressists
+and Radicals in the German Parliament and
+Berlin town-council.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Edward Drinker Cope</span> was born at
+Philadelphia, Pa. After studying at several
+Continental Universities, especially at Heidelberg,
+he became first Professor of Natural
+Science at Haverford College, and later
+Professor of Geology and Mineralogy. He
+died at an early age in 1897. As a member
+of various geological expeditions and other
+surveys, he explored chiefly Kansas, Wyoming,
+and Colorado; and he published many<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</a></span>
+most suggestive papers on the fossil vertebrate
+fauna of North America, and on classification
+especially of Amphibia and Reptiles.</p>
+
+<p>Among works of a more general philosophical
+scope may be mentioned 'The
+Origin of the Fittest,' 1887, and his latest
+work, 'The Primary Factors of Organic
+Evolution,' 1896.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Albert von <a name="Footnote_50" id="Footnote_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50">Koelliker</a></span>
+became Professor of Anatomy at Würzburg.
+His earlier studies and discoveries contributed
+considerably to the systematic development
+of the cell theory. In 1844 he observed the
+division and further multiplication of the
+original egg cell. Next year he showed the
+continuity between nerve cells and nerve
+fibres in the Vertebrata; later, that the non-striped
+or smooth muscular tissue is composed
+of cellular elements. He demonstrated that
+the Gregarinæ are unicellular creatures. In
+1852 he went with his younger friend Gegenbaur
+to Messina, where he studied especially<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</a></span>
+the development of the Cephalopoda (cuttlefishes
+and allies); and he produced a magnificent
+work on Alcyonaria, Medusæ, and
+other allied forms. He elucidated the development
+of the vertebral column, especially
+with reference to the notochord.</p>
+
+<p>In 1848 he founded, together with Th. von
+Siebold, the famous <i>Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche
+Zoologie</i>.</p>
+
+<p>A standard work on mammalian embryology
+is his 'Entwicklungsgeschichte
+des Menschen und der höheren Thiere,' a
+text-book of which the second edition
+appeared in 1879.</p>
+
+<p>At the anniversary meeting of 1897 he
+received the Copley medal, the highest honour
+which the Royal Society can bestow.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Carl <a name="Footnote_49" id="Footnote_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49">Gegenbaur</a>
+</span> was born on August 21,
+1826, in Bavaria. He studied medicine and
+kindred subjects in Würzburg, and as a pupil
+of Johannes Mueller in Berlin.</p>
+
+<p>In 1852 he went with Koelliker to Messina<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</a></span>
+to study the structure and development of the
+marine fauna. Important papers on Siphonophora,
+Echinoderms, Pteropoda, and, later,
+Hydrozoa and Mollusca, were the result.
+Soon after his return he was offered the
+chair of Anatomy at Jena, and at this retired
+spot he produced his most important works,
+devoting himself more and more to the study
+of the Vertebrata. Since 1875 he has held
+the Chair of Anatomy at Heidelberg.</p>
+
+<p>In 1859 he published his 'Principles of
+Comparative Anatomy'; but in 1870 he remodelled
+it completely, the theory of descent
+being the guiding principle. These 'Grundzüge'
+were followed by a somewhat more
+condensed 'Grundriss,' the second edition of
+which was published in 1878, and has been
+translated into French and English. In the
+meantime he had broken new ground by
+the development and treatment of certain
+problems concerning the composition and
+origin of the limbs, the shoulder-girdle and
+the skull, researches which are embodied<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</a></span>
+in his 'Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden
+Anatomie der Wirbelthiere,' 1864-65-72.</p>
+
+<p>In 1883 he brought out a text-book on
+human anatomy. This also marked a new
+epoch, because for the first time, not only the
+nomenclature, but also the general treatment
+of human anatomy, was put upon a firm
+comparative anatomical basis. The success
+of this work is indicated by the fact that it
+reached the sixth edition in 1897.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, in 1898, appeared the first volume
+of what may be called his crowning work,
+'Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere.'</p>
+
+<p>Gegenbaur is universally recognised, not
+only as the greatest living comparative
+anatomist, but also as the founder of the
+modern side of this science, by having based
+it on the theory of descent.</p>
+
+<p>In 1896 he received from the Royal Society
+the Copley medal 'for his pre-eminence in
+the science of comparative anatomy or animal
+morphology.'</p>
+
+<p>His marvellously powerful influence as a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</a></span>
+teacher and investigator has made Heidelberg
+a centre whence many pupils have
+spread his teaching, and above all his method
+of research.</p>
+
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Ernst Heinrich Haeckel</span> was born on
+February 16, 1834, at Potsdam. He carried
+out his academical studies alternately at
+Berlin and Würzburg, attracted by such
+men as Johannes Mueller, Koelliker, and
+Virchow. For years he was undecided what
+his career should be, whether that of botanist,
+collector, or geographical traveller. Certainly
+that of medicine attracted him least, although
+in deference to his father's wishes he qualified
+and settled down for a year's practice in
+Berlin. As he himself has told us, he might
+perhaps have proved rather successful as a
+physician, to judge from the fact that he did
+not lose a single patient. But 'I had only
+three patients all told, and the reason of this
+is perhaps that I had given on my plate the
+hours of consultation as from 5 to 6 <i>a.m.</i>'</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>During the year 1859 he travelled as
+medical man and artist in Sicily. In 1861
+he was induced by Gegenbaur, whose acquaintance
+he had made in Würzburg, to
+establish himself as a <i>Privat-docent</i> for comparative
+anatomy in Jena. And there he
+has remained ever since, filling the Chair of
+Zoology, and having declined several much
+more tempting offers from the Universities of
+Würzburg, Vienna, Strassburg, and Bonn.</p>
+
+<p>Within one year, 1865, he wrote the two
+volumes of his 'Generelle Morphologie der
+Organismen,' as he himself relates, in order
+to master his sorrow over the loss of his first
+wife. But he broke down, and went to the
+Canaries to recruit health and strength. The
+'Morphologie,' which has long been out of
+print,<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> made scarcely any impression. It<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</a></span>
+was ignored, probably because he had placed
+the old-fashioned study of zoology and morphology
+upon a thoroughly Darwinistic basis.</p>
+
+<p>On the advice of his friend Gegenbaur, he
+gave a more popularly written abstract of
+his 'Generelle Morphologie'&mdash;in fact, the
+substance of a series of his lectures&mdash;in
+the shape of his 'Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte.'
+This 'History of Natural
+Creation,' which in 1898 has reached the
+ninth edition (first edition translated into
+English in 1873), had the desired effect.
+So also had his '<a name="Footnote_42" id="Footnote_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42">Anthropogenie</a> oder
+<a name="Footnote_47" id="Footnote_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47">Entwicklungsgeschichte</a> des <a name="Footnote_51" id="Footnote_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51">Menschen</a>,' the
+fourth edition of which appeared in 1891.</p>
+
+<p>It was a lucky coincidence that Haeckel
+had just finished his preliminary academical
+studies, was entirely at leisure, and undetermined
+to which branch of natural science
+he should devote his genius, when Darwin's
+great work was given to the world. Haeckel
+embraced the new doctrine fervently, and,
+as Huxley was doing in England, he spread<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</a></span>
+it and fought for it with ever-increasing
+vigour in Germany.</p>
+
+<p>With marvellous vigour and quickness of
+perception he applied the principles of Evolution
+or the theory of descent to the whole
+organic world, and not only opened entirely
+new vistas for the study of morphology,
+but also worked them out and fixed them.
+He was the first to draw up pedigrees of
+the various larger groups of animals and
+plants, filling the gaps by fossils or with
+hypothetical forms (the necessary existence
+of which he arrived at by logical deductions);
+and thus he reconstructed the first universal
+pedigree, a gigantic ancestral tree, from the
+simple unicellular Am&oelig;ba to Man. Of course
+these pedigrees were entirely provisional, as
+he himself has over and over again avowed;
+but they are, nevertheless, the ideal which all
+systematists and morphologists working upon
+the basis of Evolution have since been seeking
+to establish.</p>
+
+<p>Naturally he was vigorously attacked, not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</a></span>
+only by anti-Darwinians, or rather anti-Evolutionists,
+but also by many of those
+who, having accepted the principle of transformism,
+ought to have known better.
+Perhaps they thought they did know better.
+Imperfections or mistakes in details of the
+grand attempt,&mdash;and these, naturally, were
+many,&mdash;were singled out as samples of the
+whole, which was ridiculed as the romance
+of a dreamer.</p>
+
+<p>In the end, however, this hostility, narrow-minded
+and unfair in many respects, has done
+good to the cause. There has arisen an
+ever-increasing school of workers in favour
+of the new doctrine. Owing to renewed
+research, criticism, corrections in all directions,
+we now know considerably more about
+natural classification (and this is pedigree)
+than when Haeckel first opened out the
+whole problem.</p>
+
+<p>Owing to his fearless mode of exposition,
+regardless of the indignant wrath which the
+new doctrine aroused in certain ecclesiastical<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</a></span>
+quarters, Haeckel bore the brunt of almost
+endless attacks, and had to write polemical
+essays. The result has been that friend and
+foe alike are now working on the lines which
+he has laid down; most of the ideas which
+he was the first to conceive, and to formulate
+by inventing a scientific terminology for
+them, have become important branches, or
+even disciplines, of the science.</p>
+
+<p>Most morphologists of the younger generations
+now take these terms for granted, without
+remembering the name of their founder.
+It is, therefore, perhaps not quite superfluous
+to mention some of them:</p>
+
+<p><i>Phylum</i>, or stem, the sum total of all those
+organisms which have probably descended
+from one common lower form. He distinguished
+eight such phyla&mdash;Protozoa,
+C&oelig;lenterata, Helminthes or Vermes, Tunicata,
+Mollusca, Articulata, and Vertebrata.
+The phyla are more or less analogous to
+'super-classes,' large branches or 'circles,' or
+principal groups of other zoologists.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_43" id="Footnote_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43"><i>Phylogeny</i></a>,
+the history of the <a name="Footnote_48" id="Footnote_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48">development</a> of the various <a name="Footnote_52" id="Footnote_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52">phyla</a>, classes, orders,
+families,and species.</p>
+
+<p><i>Ontogeny</i>, the history or study of the
+development of the individual, generally
+called embryology. In reality the scope of
+embryology is the ontogenetic study of the
+various species, and this branch of developmental
+study alone can be checked by direct,
+'exact' observation, for the simple reason
+that the individuals alone are entities, while
+the species, genera, families, etc., are abstract
+ideas.</p>
+
+<p>The <i>ontogenesis of any given living organism
+is a short, condensed recapitulation of its
+ancestral history or of its phylogenesis</i>. This
+is Haeckel's 'fundamental biogenetic law.'</p>
+
+<p>A complete proof of the phylogeny of any
+creature would be given by the preservation
+of an unbroken series of all its fossil ancestors.
+Such a series will in most cases, for obvious
+reasons, always remain a desideratum. In a
+few cases, however, the desideratum is nearly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</a></span>
+met: for example, the ancestral line of the
+one-toed digitigrade horse from a four-or
+five-toed plantigrade and still very generalized
+Ungulate is approaching completion.</p>
+
+<p>Phylogenetic study has to rely upon other
+help. This is afforded by comparative
+anatomy and by the study of ontogeny.
+If the latter were a faithful, unbroken recapitulation
+of all the stages through which
+the ancestors have passed, the whole matter
+would be very simple; but we know for
+certain that in the individual development
+many stages are left out (or, rather, are
+hurried through, and are so condensed by
+short-cuts being taken that we cannot
+observe them), while other features which
+have been introduced obscure, and occasionally
+modify beyond recognition, the original
+course.</p>
+
+<p>Again, the sequence of the appearance
+of the various organs is frequently upset
+(<i>heterochronism</i>). Some organs are accelerated
+in their development, while others,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</a></span>
+which we know to be phylogenetically older,
+are retarded in making their reappearance in
+the embryo.</p>
+
+<p>These disturbing or distorting newly introduced
+features or factors show themselves
+chiefly in connection with the embryonic conditions
+of growth&mdash;for example, yolk-sac,
+placenta, amnion. They all come within the
+category of <i>cænogenesis</i>: they are cænogenetic,
+while the true, undisturbed recapitulation is
+<i>palingenetic</i>.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, some features, so-called rudimentary
+or vestigial organs, instead of disappearing,
+are most tenacious in their recurrence, while
+others of originally fundamental importance
+scarcely leave recognisable traces, and are, so
+to speak, only hinted at during the embryonic
+growth of the creature we happen to study.
+Hence arises the philosophical study of
+'Dysteleology.'</p>
+
+<p>Among other terms invented by Haeckel,
+and now in general use, are <i>Metamere</i>,
+<i>Metamerism</i>, <i>C&oelig;lom</i>, <i>Gonochorism</i>, <i>Gastrula</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</a></span>
+<i>Metazoa</i>, <i>Gnathostomata</i>, <i>Acrania</i>, <i>Craniota</i>,
+and <i>Amniota</i>.</p>
+
+<p>Hitherto we have dealt with his general
+work only, a résumé of which he gave for
+many years in a course of thirty lectures
+before an audience composed of 'all sorts
+and conditions of men.' Students of biology
+and of medicine side by side with theologians,
+incipient and ordained, jurists, political economists,
+and philosophers, crowded his lecture-room
+during the 'seventies to hear the master
+explaining the 'natural history of creation' or
+the mysteries of anthropogenesis. Another
+course of eighty lectures during the winter
+semester was, and still is, devoted to a
+systematic treatment of zoology, while practical
+classes are reserved for the more select.</p>
+
+<p>His winning personality and fascinating
+eloquence, combined with a clear and concise
+delivery, have gained the enthusiastic admiration
+of many a student who went to the quiet
+University town in order to learn with his
+own ears and eyes.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><i>List of Separate Publications by Professor
+Haeckel.</i></p>
+
+<p>'Biologische Studien. I.: Studien ueber
+die Moneren und andere Protisten.' Leipzig,
+1870 (out of print). He was the first to
+make observations on the natural history of
+the Monera, living bits of protoplasm, devoid
+even of a nucleus&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, <i>Protogenes primordialis</i>,
+<i>Protomyxa aurantiaca</i>.</p>
+
+<p>'Monographie der Radiolarien.' Berlin,
+1862-88. With 171 plates.</p>
+
+<p>'Entwicklungsgeschichte der Siphonophoren.'
+Utrecht, 1869.</p>
+
+<p>'Plankton-Studien. Vergleichende Untersuchungen
+ueber die Bedeutung und
+Zusammensetzung der pelagischen Fauna
+und Flora.' Jena, 1880.</p>
+
+<p>'Metagenesis und Hypogenesis von
+Aurelia aurita.' Jena, 1881.</p>
+
+<p>'Monographie der Geryoniden oder
+Ruesselquallen.' Leipzig, 1865.</p>
+
+<p>'Generelle Morphologie der Organismen.'
+2 vols. Berlin, 1866.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>'Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte
+des Menschen,' 1874; 4th edition,
+1891.</p>
+
+<p>'Natuerliche Schoepfungs-Geschichte.' 2
+vols. Berlin, 1st edition, 1868; 9th edition,
+1898. This work has been translated into
+most European languages (the first edition in
+English, under the title 'Natural History of
+Creation' in 1873; the eighth in 1892).</p>
+
+<p>'Monographie der Kalkschwaemme.' 3
+vols. Berlin, 1872 (out of print). With the
+subtitle, 'An Attempt to solve analytically
+the Problem of the Origin of Species.' In
+this work, illustrated by sixty plates, he
+showed that the Calcispongia are individually
+so yielding, so adaptive to external influences,
+that it is practically impossible to break up
+the whole group into anything like satisfactory
+species or genera. According to
+predilection, we can distinguish either 1 genus
+with only 3 species, or 3, 21, 43 genera, with
+21, 111, 181, or 289 species respectively.</p>
+
+<p>In this work, in 1872, Haeckel established<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[Pg 112]</a></span>
+the homology of the two primary layers, ecto-
+and endoderm, throughout the Metazoa.
+The attempt to do the same for the four
+secondary layers, as made in the second part
+of his 'Gastræa-theory,' failed. It caused
+an enormous amount of research, hitherto
+without a satisfactory solution of the problem.</p>
+
+<p>'Studien zur Gastræa-Theorie.' Jena,
+1874. The transformation of the single
+primitive egg-cell by cleavage into a globular
+mass of cells (Morula)&mdash;which latter, becoming
+hollow (and then known as the Blastula),
+turns ultimately by invagination or by delamination
+into the Gastrula&mdash;is a series of
+processes which applies to all Metazoa. The
+Gastrula is, therefore, the ancestral form of
+the Metazoa; and the Gastræa-theory,
+founded by Haeckel, throws light, on the one
+hand, upon the mystery of the phyletic connection
+of the various animal groups, while,
+on the other hand, it connects the Metazoa,
+or multicellular organisms, with the lowest
+Protozoa. We come to this conclusion because<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</a></span>
+the Gastrula arises from and passes
+through stages which exist as independent,
+permanent organisms among the Protozoa.</p>
+
+<p>Needless to say this Gastræa-theory has
+been violently attacked in detail, with the
+result that various modifications of the Gastrula,
+until then undreamed of, have become
+known.</p>
+
+<p>'Monographie der Medusen.' Jena, 1879-81.
+With 72 coloured plates.</p>
+
+<p>'Reports on the Scientific Results of the
+Voyage of H.M.S. <i>Challenger</i>.' With 230
+plates:</p>
+
+<blockquote>
+<p>1. Deep-sea Medusæ. 1881.<br />
+2. Radiolaria. 1887.<br />
+3. Siphonophoræ. 1888.<br />
+4. Deep-sea Keratosa. 1889.<br />
+</p></blockquote>
+
+<p>A short holiday spent on the coasts of the
+Red Sea produced the volume 'Arabische
+Korallen' (Berlin, 1876); and a longer trip
+to Ceylon has been described in 'Indische
+Reisebriefe,' of which the third edition<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</a></span>
+appeared in 1893. The English translation
+(1883) is entitled 'A Visit to Ceylon.'</p>
+
+<p>'Monism as connecting Religion and
+Science: the Confession of Faith of a Man
+of Science.' 1894.</p>
+
+<p>Haeckels latest work is the 'Systematische
+Phylogenie' (Berlin, 1896), three volumes
+dealing with Protistæ and Plants, Invertebrata
+and Vertebrata. They contain the author's
+views on the natural system of the organic
+world, both living and extinct. Notable in
+the work are the many reconstructions of
+ancestral forms which, provided Evolution is
+true, must have existed&mdash;hypothetical until
+they, or something like them, are found in a
+fossil state. Everybody who works systematically,
+and upon the basis of Evolution,
+does, sometimes unconsciously, reconstruct
+such links, although he may perhaps not see
+the necessity, or have the courage to fix
+his vision, by assigning to it all those attributes
+or characters which are indicated by
+deductions from comparative anatomy, palæontology,
+and embryology.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>THEORY OF CELLS.</h2>
+
+
+<p>The vegetable cell was discovered by
+<i>Schleiden</i>, Professor of Botany at Jena, in
+1838. Next year <i>Schwann</i> found the animal
+cell.</p>
+
+<p>In 1844 <i>Koelliker</i> discovered that the egg
+cell, by division and multiplication, becomes
+an aggregation&mdash;a heap of new cells.</p>
+
+<p>In 1849 <i>Huxley</i> found the two primary
+layers (observed long before by <i>Pander</i> and
+<i>Baer</i> in the chick) also in certain Invertebrata,
+the Medusæ; and he called these layers
+'ectoderm' and 'endoderm' respectively.</p>
+
+<p>In 1851 <i>Remak</i>, in his 'Untersuchungen
+über die Entwicklung der Thiere,' showed
+the egg to be a simple cell, and that from it,
+by repeated division or multiplication, arise<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</a></span>
+the germinal layers, and that by differentiation
+of the cells of these layers are formed
+all the tissues of the body.</p>
+
+<p><i>Kowalevsky</i>, of St. Petersburg, found the
+two primary germinal layers also in Worms,
+Echinoderms, Articulata, and other animals.</p>
+
+<p><i>Haeckel</i>, in 1872, found the same in the
+Sponges. He stated that these two germinal
+layers occur in all animals, except in the
+Protozoa; and that they are homologous,
+or equivalent, in all the groups of animals,
+from the Sponges up to Man. In 1873, in
+his 'Gastræa-theorie,' he explained the
+phylogenetic significance, and tried to show
+the homology, of the four secondary germinal
+layers.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>FACTORS OF EVOLUTION.</h2>
+
+
+<p>An organism, as living matter, does not
+stand in opposition to, or outside of, the rest
+of the world. It is part of the world. It
+receives matter from its surroundings, and
+gives some back; therefore it is influenced
+by its surroundings. It is acted upon, and
+it reacts upon the latter, and if these change
+(and they are nowhere and never strictly the
+same) the organism also <i>varies</i>. It <i>adapts</i>
+itself, and if it does not, or, rather, cannot,
+do so, it dies, because it is unfit to live in the
+world, or, rather, in those particular surroundings
+and conditions in which it happens to be.
+That organism which yields most easily, accommodates
+itself most quickly, has the best
+chance of existence&mdash;<i>survival of the fittest</i>.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</a></span>
+'Fitness' in this case does not mean fitness
+to live, but rather a particular condition which
+happens to fit into the new circumstances.</p>
+
+<p>Adaptation and variation are simultaneous:
+they are fundamentally the same. If there
+were no adaptability and no variability,
+those simplest of organisms which we suppose
+to have sprung into existence in the
+pre-Cambrian period would long ago have
+ceased to exist.</p>
+
+<p>It is the physiological momentum which
+models the organism, and, by causing its
+adaptations, has produced its organs by
+change of function. Gegenbaur illustrates
+this most important fundamental truth by
+an excellent example. Suppose that, in an
+absolutely simple organism, all the parts of
+its exterior are under the same functional
+conditions, so that each part of the surface
+can take in food, and that this is digested,
+assimilated, in the interior. There is, in
+this condition, not yet any definite organ.
+If this organism sinks to the bottom and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</a></span>
+becomes sessile, this part is excluded from
+taking in nourishing matter, while the
+opposite surface alone remains, or becomes
+more, fit for this function. Thus, a simple
+variation and adaptation has been produced,
+and if the same organism continues in this
+position, its bottom cells will estrange themselves
+from their original function, while
+those on the top will convey the food into
+the interior, where a cavity will be formed,
+ultimately with a permanent opening, the
+primitive gut and mouth, both very different
+from the 'foot.'</p>
+
+<p>Thus, by adaptation and variation the
+organism acquires new functions, organs,
+features, and it gives up and eventually loses
+others. Its offspring is like it. Like produces
+like. This is the principle of <i>heredity</i>.
+Adaptation, when going on generation after
+generation on the same lines in the same
+direction, becomes continuous, and has an
+intensifying, <i>cumulative</i> effect. By always
+weeding out from a flock of pigeons those birds<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</a></span>
+which possess more dark feathers than the
+rest, we ultimately produce an entirely white
+race. We hurry on what Nature does slowly.</p>
+
+<p>The inheritance of acquired characters
+becomes very obvious in the following
+example: The Monera are the lowest living
+organisms known; they consist of a mass of
+protoplasm, and are still devoid of even a
+nucleus. They multiply simply by division;
+each half is like the other, and like the parent
+(which by this process has ceased to exist),
+except that each is smaller and has to grow.
+A certain Moneron, <i>Protomyxa aurantiaca</i>,
+is orange-coloured, and its offspring is from
+the beginning of the same colour, and this
+colour has been acquired by that kind of
+Monera-like protoplasm which thereby has
+become the species called Aurantiaca. We
+have no reason for assuming that there
+existed from the beginning of life not only
+colourless, but also red, orange, and other
+kinds of protoplasm. In these simplest of
+organisms the whole process of heredity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</a></span>
+seems very obvious; but in the higher ones,
+in those which propagate by eggs, the
+problem is infinitely more complicated. It
+is true that the egg is, strictly, nothing but a
+small part of the parental organism, and we
+know from everyday experience that this
+single egg-cell has in it all the attributes and
+characteristics of the parent; but these attributes
+and characteristics make their appearance
+successively, just as the egg cell of a
+chick has neither wings nor feathers, not
+even a backbone, but develops these organs
+because its parents have them.</p>
+
+<p>The theory that acquired characters are
+hereditary has often been vigorously attacked;
+but the champions of the negative position
+have not given us anything satisfactory
+instead. They question, also, the principle
+of adaptation as a factor in Evolution, and
+substitute 'variation,' coupled with 'natural
+selection.'</p>
+
+<p>They point to Darwin's argument: (1) It
+is a fact that animals and plants produce a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</a></span>
+much greater number of young than in their
+turn grow up to propagate the race; (2) no
+two of the frequently many individuals of
+the same breed are exactly alike, although
+the differences may be hidden to our perception
+(this is quite true, because no two
+entities can live in absolutely the same place
+and conditions); (3) through heredity the
+offspring takes over the faculties and features
+of the parents; (4) what decides which of
+the many individuals (each one possessing
+some aberration or variation) are to live and
+to propagate the race?&mdash;obviously those
+individual variations which happen to make
+the lucky possessors most fit for the struggle
+for life.</p>
+
+<p>So far, well; but the 'Neo-Darwinians'
+imagine that 'adaptation' is not the cause, but
+the result, the effect, of the formation of
+species. According to them, the species are
+neither adapted by, nor do they adapt themselves
+to, their surroundings. Adaptation is to
+them an accomplished fact, a condition which a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[Pg 123]</a></span>
+species happens to be in because its particular
+variation is the one which, to the exclusion
+of others, suits or fits into its surroundings.
+Such a view simply takes variation for
+granted, and stipulates it as a something
+<i>a priori</i>, without raising the further necessary
+question, why there should be any
+variations at all. Why, indeed, unless they
+are caused by external influences? Haeckel
+elucidated this by the conception of adaptation
+as explained in the foregoing pages.</p>
+
+<p>These and kindred speculations have produced
+some rather curious discussions, which
+not infrequently end in conundrums. If we
+speak of a case of adaptation as a condition, a
+fact, we easily run the risk of getting into confusion
+about cause and effect. For example: Is
+the stag swift because he has long and slender
+legs, or are his legs long because he is swift?
+In reality, swiftness and length of legs are
+cause and effect in one. His legs have been
+so modified as to make him swift, because he
+has put them continuously to whatever was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</a></span>
+his full speed, which in his thick-footed
+ancestors was probably a very slow one.
+The above question reads, therefore, more
+sensibly as follows: Has the stag become
+swift because his legs have become long and
+slender, or have his legs become long and
+slender because he has attained swiftness?
+Now, we see that both halves of the double
+question are practically the same and instantly
+suggest the answer.</p>
+
+<p>A fundamental difference between artificial
+machines and living organisms is that the
+former are worn out by use, while the latter
+not only repair the loss caused by use, but are
+also stimulated to further increase. On the
+other hand, organs which are not put into
+function, or are not used, <i>degenerate</i>. The
+various cells of the organ react upon external
+stimuli by increased activity. Why this should
+be so is another question&mdash;perhaps because
+those which do not would soon be not fit to
+survive. Each cell has a function; the more
+specialized the more intense it is. Every<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[Pg 125]</a></span>
+external stimulus, every contact with the
+outer surroundings, is an insult, necessarily
+of detrimental effect, as it disturbs the equilibrium
+of the cell body. It must, therefore,
+be of advantage to the cells' well-being to
+return as soon as possible to the <i>status quo
+ante</i>, and this can only be done by increased
+activity.</p>
+
+<p>In the present state of our knowledge,
+we can approach only the simplest cases of
+acquisition of characteristics. Mostly they
+are so complicated, subject to so many unthought-of
+conditions, that we do not know
+from which end to approach the problem.
+Frequently the supposed use of certain
+obvious features is the merest guesswork.
+This applies especially to features to which
+we are not accustomed (although wrongly
+so) to assign a function&mdash;for example, coloration.
+A green tree-frog will with predilection
+rest on green leaves. The advantages
+of concealment are obvious, and in this case
+he 'adapts himself' to the surroundings by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</a></span>
+making for green localities: if he did not
+he would be eaten up sooner than his more
+circumspect comrades. But this making for,
+and sitting in, the green has not <i>necessarily</i>
+made him of that colour. Extreme advocates
+of one view would argue as follows:
+Once upon a time there were among the
+offspring of ancestral tree-frogs some which,
+among other colours, exhibited green, not
+much, perhaps not even perceptible to our
+eyes. The occurrence of this colour, according
+to them, was spontaneous, a freak&mdash;as if
+in reality there were anything spontaneous
+in the sense of being causeless. The
+descendants of these more greenish creatures,
+provided they did not pair with frogs of the
+ordinary set, became still greener (by accumulative
+inheritance), and so on, until the green
+was pronounced sufficient to be of advantage
+when competition could set in.</p>
+
+<p>With this view there is always the difficulty
+of understanding how the initial very
+small changes can be useful, unless we have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</a></span>
+to deal with extremely simple organisms. Is
+it likely in the case of our frogs that an
+almost imperceptible variation in colour makes
+them more fit to live? We have to assume
+that 'luck' or chance kept them for generations
+out of harm's reach, until the accumulation
+of green, hitherto quite ineffective,
+neither harmful nor useful, became strong
+enough to be effective. Such cases undoubtedly
+happen.</p>
+
+<p>But we can also argue out this problem
+in a somewhat different way, which goes
+nearer to the root of the whole process. The
+original slight, imperceptible change in pigmentation
+is not a spontaneous freak; it was
+caused by the direct influence of the surroundings
+in which the particular frogs
+happened to live, be this factor light or
+temperature or food. Thus it stands to
+reason that the offspring, living under similar
+conditions, will be acted upon in the same
+way. That factor which has added green to
+the parents will add green to the children,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</a></span>
+until by accumulative inheritance a more
+decidedly green race is produced.</p>
+
+<p>The offspring of green plants do not
+become green when grown in the dark; the
+young plants inherit not the green, but the
+capacity of becoming green when acted upon
+by sunlight. This as an instance of direct
+influence of the surroundings on a substance
+(chlorophyll), which has not yet performed a
+function. But the kittens of a pair of black
+cats produce black hair before they are born,
+and we have no reason to doubt that the
+black pigment in their tegumentary structures
+is ultimately referable to the action of the
+sunlight. In many instances creatures living
+for generations in darkness become white,
+pigmentless, and they regain it when exposed
+to light. For example, the white, colourless
+Proteus from the caves of Adelsberg becomes
+clouded grey, and ultimately jet black, when
+kept in a tank whence light is not strictly
+excluded.</p>
+
+<p>Blindness is a very general characteristic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[Pg 129]</a></span>
+of creatures which dwell in darkness. There
+are all stages between total blindness and
+weak eyes. Now, do these blind creatures
+live in darkness because they are blind, or
+have they become first weak-eyed and then
+blind because of the continuous disuse of
+their eyes? The former explanation has
+actually been suggested! Individuals not
+smitten, but spontaneously, as a freak, born
+with sore eyes, have crept into the darkness
+for relief and have produced a blind race!
+To carry such a notion to the bitter end leads
+to absurdities. Anyhow, it is not understandable
+where the benefit of losing the
+eyesight arises. It can be explained only
+by continued disuse: witness <i>Spalax typhlus</i>,
+the blind mole, and, above all, the Endoparasites.</p>
+
+<p>Let us now take an example to explain the
+influence of a tangible external stimulus.
+Repeated pressure produces callosities.
+Although they are not exactly beneficial
+in the shape of corns on our toes, they are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[Pg 130]</a></span>
+so on our hands. At any rate, the morphologist
+can trace the development of the
+footpads, nails, hoofs, and horns, step by
+step from small beginnings. The cells of
+the Malpighian stratum, of the inner, active
+portion of our epidermis, are excited to extra
+activity, and by continually producing more
+horn cells than peel off the surface of the
+skin in the normal process of wear and tear
+cause the formation of the pad. It need
+scarcely be mentioned that hypertrophic
+growths are not necessarily useful; they are
+often harmful, and in that case pathological.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, a few words about the very difficult
+question of <i>teleology</i>. In trying to explain
+Evolution in a mechanical&mdash;sometimes called
+monistic, but in reality natural&mdash;way, we
+exclude anything like a set purpose, a goal,
+or ideal, a final condition which the organism
+strives to attain. Unknown, however, to
+many morphologists, especially embryologists,
+their writings are full of this teleological
+notion. Indeed, there are many cases<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</a></span>
+in which an organism becomes changed, and
+quickly, too, in a way which cannot but be
+called reasonable. It starts modifications, be
+they outgrowths, alterations in shape or colour,
+or the making good of injuries received,
+which by 'short-cuts' produce the only
+advantageous result that can reasonably
+satisfy the new requirement or altered circumstances.</p>
+
+<p>Trees growing in precarious positions,
+after part of the supporting rock has slipped
+away, throw out new roots, and rearrange some
+of the old ones in the only way which could
+save the tree. In animals which have lost part
+of a limb the wound closes up, and what is left
+is turned into a serviceable stump&mdash;for
+example, in water-tortoises (creatures in which
+reproduction of lost limbs does not happen).
+In frogs and newts the lost part is reproduced,
+not correctly, but in a good semblance.
+Tortoises which have had their shell smashed
+can throw off an astonishingly large portion
+and renew the bone as well as the over<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</a></span>lapping
+scutes; but this mending is not neatly
+done. It serves the requirement, but it is
+patchwork; the new shell is such as no
+tortoise ever possessed before.</p>
+
+<p>Mammals transported into colder countries,
+or subjected to continued exposure, grow a
+thicker coat; and the same kind of tree
+which in a sheltered valley is tall, large-leaved,
+and soft-wooded, assumes a very
+different aspect, although perhaps growing
+into a healthy specimen, when planted on a
+wind-exposed hill.</p>
+
+<p>There is no room, or, rather, no time, to
+apply to these cases the principle of many
+variations or the long-continued accumulation
+of infinitely small changes. The thing is to
+be done quickly, or not at all. Nor can we
+explain the mending of a wound, which
+implies an activity of countless cells, simply
+as a case of, or similar to, the reproduction
+of a lost part; against such an
+explanation militates the almost absolute
+unlikelihood of that precise injury having<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[Pg 133]</a></span>
+happened before to any of the creature's
+ancestors.</p>
+
+<p>Still, I think we are brought near the solution
+of the mystery by such considerations.
+We see no difficulty in the regeneration of a
+few cells, or in the making good of the disturbance
+suffered by one of the most simple
+organisms; but we become suspicious when
+we see that countless cells, not of one kind,
+but of the most varied tissues and parts of
+the body, make common cause in remedying
+a defect in a serviceable way.</p>
+
+<p>We must assume that since the beginning
+of life organisms have been subjected to
+countless insults. We can scarcely speak of
+a wound in an Amæba; but these insults
+have always been made good, and whenever
+this was not the case, that particular organism
+came to an end. As these organisms developed
+into more complicated ones, the
+possible insults became more serious, more
+complicated; and the organisms took adaptive
+measures so as to be superior to them. This<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</a></span>
+action, I have no hesitation in declaring,
+became by heredity a habit. The whole
+creature became so thoroughly 'imbued' (for
+want of a better word) with the finding of
+ways and means for meeting sudden, serious
+conditions, that it now acts directly, and
+produces by a short-cut, with the least amount
+of time and with the smallest possible waste
+of material, that which meets the occasion,
+thereby saving the life of the individual and
+that of the race. This we cannot but call
+reasonable and to the purpose, although it is
+all carried out by <i>causæ efficientes</i> without
+there being any <i>causæ finales</i>.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<h2>GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION.</h2>
+
+
+<p>One million years is a stretch of time beyond
+our conception. We can arrive at a more or
+less adequate understanding of what a million
+individuals or concrete things means. Several
+Continental nations can put more than a
+million men into the field. We can gaze at
+a building which contains as many bricks;
+and we know that our own body is composed
+of millions of millions of cells. No
+such help applies to time, because that itself
+is an entirely relative, abstract conception.
+We can imagine what one hundred years are
+like&mdash;a span of time seemingly short to the
+hale and hearty octogenarian, enormous to
+the child, totally inapplicable to certain<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</a></span>
+animals whose whole life is crowded into one
+single day.</p>
+
+<p>Astronomers have long ceased to reckon
+distances by miles or any other understandable
+unit. They express the distances
+between us and the stars and nebulæ by
+'years of light.' Try to imagine a unit of
+length equal to that which is passed through
+by light (186,000 miles per second) in one
+year. Not so very long ago the enormous
+distances resulting from astronomical calculations
+were looked upon as the most serious
+objection to the correctness of the astronomers'
+views as to the distances which separate our
+globe from the nearest fixed stars. We have
+not yet accustomed ourselves to reckoning
+time by some similar broadly-conceived
+standard&mdash;say æons of so many thousand
+years each.</p>
+
+<p>Unfortunately, we possess no data whatever
+for calculating the age of the successive
+geological strata. Thanks to Lyell, the
+theory of violent universal cataclysms has<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</a></span>
+been done away with. It is more probable
+that the same agencies have acted which are
+now changing the aspect of the globe; and
+these changes are slow, as far as we know
+them&mdash;at least, as far as the formation of
+sedimentary strata is concerned, and these
+alone we have to deal with. Various calculations
+have been made, based upon the
+denudation of the mountains, the filling up of
+the valleys by the débris, the formation of
+deltas, etc. The results give enormous
+stretches of time, but all of them unsatisfactory,
+because the methods are so very local in
+their application.</p>
+
+<p>The least objectionable attempt is that
+which, based upon astronomical calculations,
+tried to fix the height of the last Glacial
+epoch<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> at about 200,000 years ago, and
+asserted that since its beginning in the
+Pliocene epoch as many as 270,000 years
+have elapsed. The duration of the whole<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</a></span>
+Tertiary period has by the same authorities
+been fixed approximately at 3,000,000 to
+4,000,000 years. Beyond this we cannot venture
+without the wildest speculation; but we
+know to a certain extent the thickness of the
+various sedimentary strata, which amount in
+all to from 100,000 to 175,000 feet&mdash;on the
+average perhaps 130,000 feet, or about twenty
+miles.</p>
+
+<p>Unless we prefer giving up all attempt
+at calculation as absolutely hopeless, and
+thus resign the whole problem, we must at
+least try to arrive at some results, and then
+see if these cannot reasonably be made use of.</p>
+
+<p>Neither geologist nor physicist, and no
+zoologist, would accept the suggestion that
+these 130,000 feet of stratified rocks have
+been deposited within only as many years,
+although the average rate of deposit would
+in that case be not more than 1 foot per
+year. On the other hand, an indignant protest
+is raised against the assumption of
+1,000,000,000 years.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Lord Kelvin<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> has come to the conclusion
+(from data which various other authorities
+regard as very unsatisfactory) that not
+much more than 100,000,000 years can have
+elapsed since the molten globe acquired a
+consolidated crust. Further time must have
+passed before the surface had become stable
+and cool enough to allow the temperature of
+the collecting oceans to fall below boiling-point,
+and it is obvious that life cannot
+possibly have begun until after this had
+happened.</p>
+
+<p>Wallace, in his 'Island Life,' by making
+use of Professor A. Geikie's results as to the
+rate of denudation of matter by rivers from
+the area of their basins, and estimating the
+average rate of deposition, concludes that
+'the time required to produce this thickness
+of rock [Professor Haughton's maximum of
+177,000 feet] at the present rate of denudation
+and deposition is only 28,000,000 years.'<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</a></span>
+Our lower assumption of 130,000 feet thickness
+would give only 20,000,000 years&mdash;a
+rate of 1 foot in 154 years.</p>
+
+<p>Again, if we prefer round numbers to start
+with, we have only to assume that the age of
+the whole Tertiary period, with its 3,000 feet
+thickness, is 3,000,000 years (<i>i.e.</i>, 1,000 feet
+in 1,000,000 years, or 1 foot in 1,000 years,
+surely an excessively slow rate); then
+130,000,000 years would bring us to the
+bottom of the Laurentian or pre-Cambrian
+deposits. Of course, it is a pure assumption
+that the same rate of destruction and sedimentation
+applies to the whole of the strata;
+but we know nothing to the contrary, especially
+if we consider the average periods, the
+quick periods of extra activity, taken with the
+slow periods or those of standstill.</p>
+
+<p>Dana estimated the length of the whole
+Tertiary period at one-fifteenth of the Mesozoic
+and Palæozoic combined. If we take
+the duration of the Tertiary period, as before,
+as 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 years, the total<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</a></span>
+will amount to from 45,000,000 to 60,000,000
+years.</p>
+
+<p>Lastly, Walcott<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> has estimated the duration
+of the Palæozoic, Mesozoic, and Cænozoic
+or Tertiary epochs at about 17,000,000,
+7,000,000 and 3,000,000 years respectively,
+giving 27,700,000 years from the beginning
+of the Cambrian; and Williams<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> has calculated
+the relative duration of the smaller
+epochs. See the table on p. 149.</p>
+
+<p>The results of all these calculations fall
+surprisingly well within the limits of Lord
+Kelvin's allowance. Of course they are
+based upon assumptions, but none of them
+is inherently unreasonable; and it was my
+purpose to draw attention to the surprising
+coincidence in the closeness of these results,
+perhaps too good to be true. Such calculations
+are considered close enough if they
+range within a few multiples of each other.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</a></span></p>
+<p>Zoologists have fallen into the habit of
+requiring enormous lengths of time for the
+evolution of the animal kingdom. We know
+that Evolution is at best a slow process, and
+the conception of the changes necessary to
+evolve man from monkey-like creatures, these
+from the lowest imaginary mammals, these
+from some reptilian stock, thence descending
+to Dipnoan fish-like creatures, and so on
+back into Invertebrata, down to the simple
+Monera&mdash;this conception is indeed gigantic.
+Innumerable, almost endless, slow changes
+require seemingly unlimited time, and as time
+is endless, why not draw upon it <i>ad libitum</i>?</p>
+
+<p>Huxley pointed out that it took nearly the
+whole of the Tertiary epoch to produce the
+horse out of the four-toed Eohippos, and
+that, if we apply this rate to the rest of
+its pedigree, enormous times would be required.
+This is, however, a very misleading
+statement, which necessitates considerable
+reduction, in conformity with our increased
+palæontological knowledge. Animals of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[Pg 143]</a></span>
+genus Equus&mdash;namely, Ungulata, with one
+toe, and with a certain tooth pattern&mdash;from
+the Upper Miocene of India are now known.
+Moreover, it is not simply a question of the
+gradual loss of the side-toes. The change
+from the fox-sized little Eohippos and Hyracotherium,
+so far as skull, teeth, vertebral
+column, and limbs are concerned (about the
+soft parts we know next to nothing), is a
+very great one indeed.</p>
+
+<p>Elephants and mammoths seem to have
+developed very rapidly. None are known
+from Eocene strata; but towards the end
+of the Miocene they had spread over Asia,
+Europe, and North America, and that in
+great numbers. The Eocene Amblypoda
+are still so different that we hesitate to connect
+them ancestrally with the elephants.</p>
+
+<p>The Pinnipedia (seals and walruses) are
+strongly modified fissiped Carnivora, and have
+existed since at least the Upper Miocene;
+the transformation must have been accomplished
+within the Miocene period.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">[Pg 144]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that
+various groups have from the time of their
+first appearance burst out into an exuberant
+growth of modifications in form, size, and
+numbers, into all possible&mdash;and one might
+almost say impossible&mdash;shapes; and they
+have done this within comparatively short
+periods, after which they have died out not
+less rapidly. It seems almost as if these go-ahead
+creatures had, by accepting every
+possible modification and carrying the same
+to the extreme, too quickly exhausted their
+plasticity&mdash;which, after all, must have limits&mdash;thereby
+becoming unable to meet successfully
+the requirements of further changes in their
+surroundings. The slowly developing groups,
+keeping within main lines of Evolution, and
+not being tempted into aberrant side-issues,
+had, after all, a much better chance of onward
+evolution.</p>
+
+<p>A good example of the former are the
+Dinosaurs. We do not know their ancestors;
+but we have here to deal only with their<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">[Pg 145]</a></span>
+range of transformation. The oldest known
+forms occur in the Upper Trias; they attain
+their most stupendous development in the
+Upper Jurassic and in the Wealden; and
+they have died out with the Cretaceous epoch.
+But already some of their earliest forms had
+assumed bipedal gait, and the Oolitic Compsognathus
+had developed almost bird-like hind-limbs.</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, there are many
+instances of extremely slow development&mdash;facts
+which raise the difficult question of
+'persistent types.' Are these due to a state of
+perfection which cannot be improved upon?
+Or are they due to a kind of morphological
+consolidation (not necessarily specialization)
+which can no longer yield easily, so that therefore
+through changes in their surroundings
+they may come to an end sooner than more
+plastic groups?</p>
+
+<p>Struthio, the ostrich; Orycteropus, the
+Cape ant-eater; Tapirus, and many others,
+existed in the Miocene age practically as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">[Pg 146]</a></span>
+they are now; but pre-Pliocene dolphins,
+cats, monkeys, stags, all belong to closely-allied
+and well-defined 'genera,' but different
+from the living forms.</p>
+
+<p>Alligators and crocodiles are known from
+the Upper Chalk; Tomistoma since the
+Miocene; Gavialis since the Pliocene.</p>
+
+<p>The oldest surviving reptile is Sphenodon,
+the Hatteria of New Zealand, a fair representative
+of what generalized reptiles of the
+later Triassic period seem to have been like;
+and to the same period belongs Ceratodus,
+the Australian mud-fish, hitherto the oldest
+known surviving genus of a very ancient and
+low type so far as Vertebrata are concerned.</p>
+
+<p>Now let us see if the above estimates of
+geological time are so utterly inapplicable to
+animal evolution. On purpose we take one
+of the lowest estimates, about 28,000,000
+years, and apportion them equally to the
+various strata or epochs.</p>
+
+<p>The original owner of the famous Trinil
+skull, a <i>Pithecanthropus erectus</i>, lived,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">[Pg 147]</a></span>
+according to some, in the Late Pliocene,
+according to others in the Early Plistocene,
+period&mdash;that is to say, somewhere about
+the beginning of our last Glacial epoch,
+some 270,000 years ago. Assuming that
+he and his like reached puberty at sixteen
+to twenty years of age, about 17,000 generations
+would lie between him and ourselves,
+or, to put it more forcibly, between
+him and the lowest living human races&mdash;say
+the Ceylonese Veddahs. Only 250 generations,
+at twenty years, carry us back to
+3000 <span class="smcap">B.C.</span> (<i>i.e.</i>, beyond the ken of history); and
+if it be objected that the differences between
+the oldest inhabitants of Egypt, the Naquada,
+and the present Fellahin are very slight,
+we are welcome to multiply these differences
+sixty or seventy fold, in order to arrive at the
+Pithecanthropus level. But these Naquada
+had no metal implements, and there cannot be
+the slightest doubt that the development of
+the human race went on by leaps and bounds
+after certain discoveries had been made&mdash;to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">[Pg 148]</a></span>
+wit, the use of implements and that of fire.
+That creature which first took up a stone or
+a branch and wielded it thereby got such an
+enormous advantage over his fellow-creatures
+that his mental and bodily development went
+on apace. The same applies to the improvement
+of speech. We assume the single,
+monophyletic origin of mankind at one place,
+in one district; and the differences between
+some of the races of man are great enough
+to constitute what we might call species.
+Compare the Venus of Milo, that noble expression
+of the ancient Greeks' notion of
+female beauty, with the 'products of art' of
+the Veddahs or the dwarfs of Central Africa,
+or think of the beau-idéal which a Michael
+Angelo could possibly have evolved if he had
+never seen any but such people.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">[Pg 149]</a></span></p>
+
+<div style="line-height:90%">
+<table id="tae" summary="time" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" rules="cols" frame="box">
+<tr style="border:1px solid black;">
+ <td class="tdc">I.</td>
+ <td class="tdc">II.</td>
+ <td class="tdc" >III.</td>
+ <td class="tdc" >IV.</td>
+ <td class="tdc" >V.</td>
+ <td class="tdc" >VII.</td>
+ <td class="tdc">VII.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Recent</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Adam and Eve</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr">250</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Plistocene</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}&nbsp;5</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Man, contemp-</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr">3,500</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}&nbsp; 270,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;orary with Reindeer</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; in France</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Pliocene -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >} 3,000,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Pithecanthropus</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >16</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >} 600,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; erectus</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Miocene -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}10</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Anthropoid</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >10</td>
+ <td class="tdr">60,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >} 2,100,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; Apes</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Eocene -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Lemurs</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">420,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Cretaceous -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;10</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;3,600,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Jurassic -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;5</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1,800,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Rhætic -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Prototheria, or</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">&nbsp;&nbsp;1,800,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;first Mammalia</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >} 7,200,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Keuper -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">} 5</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}1,800,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Muschelkalk -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">New Red</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Theomorpha</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">425,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Sandstone </td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Magnesian</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Limestone</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Lower Red</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Proreptilia</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">250,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Sandstone</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}15</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}4,000,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Coal-measures</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Eotetrapoda</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">500,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Mountain</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Limestone</td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}17,500,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Devonian -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;15</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >4,000,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Dipnoi and</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">1,000,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; Crossopterygii</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Silurian -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;10</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >2,700,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >First fishlike</td>
+ <td class="tdr" >3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">900,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl">}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; creatures</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Ordovician -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;10</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >2,700,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Cambrian -</td>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;15</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >}</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp;4,000,000</td>
+ <td class="tdl" >Sum total of</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Laurentian -</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; generations</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">Archean or</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" >&nbsp; (about)</td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr">5,375,000</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+ <td class="tdl">&nbsp;Metamorphic</td>
+ <td class="tdl"></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdl" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr" ></td>
+ <td class="tdr"></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+</div>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">[Pg 150]</a></span></p>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">Explanation of the Table on p. 149.</span></p>
+
+<blockquote>
+
+<p>Column I. contains the names of the successive sedimentary
+strata.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;"&nbsp; &nbsp;II. contains the percentage of the duration of the
+various epochs, according to <i>Williams</i>, the
+time from the Cambrian until recent times
+being taken as 100.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;"&nbsp; &nbsp; III. gives the estimated duration in years of the
+Palæozoic, Mesozoic, and Cænozoic periods,
+according to <i>Walcott</i>.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;"&nbsp;&nbsp;IV. gives in years the duration of the various
+smaller epochs, as computed from Walcott and
+Williams' statements.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;" &nbsp; &nbsp;V. Representatives of stages of the ancestral line of
+man. The names stand in the level of the
+stratum in which they have made their first
+appearance.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;" &nbsp; &nbsp;VI. contains the number of years which, in the present
+calculation, have been assumed necessary for
+the animal to reach puberty.</p>
+
+<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;"&nbsp; &nbsp;VII. contains the number of generations which can
+have elapsed from stage to stage. For example,
+60,000 generations separate the earliest known
+anthropoid apes from Pithecanthropus.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p>Let us follow the descent of man further
+back. The next stage, reckoning backwards,
+is that from Pithecanthropus to <i>bonâ-fide</i>
+anthropoid apes. They are represented in
+the Miocene by various genera&mdash;<i>e.g.</i>, Pliopithecus
+and Dryopithecus. According to
+Croll and Wallace, 850,000 years ago carry us<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">[Pg 151]</a></span>
+into the Miocene epoch. Assuming that
+these apes lived about 600,000 years before
+Pithecanthropus, namely, in the later half of
+the Miocene, and taking puberty at ten years
+of age, a high estimate, we get not less than
+60,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>2. From Apes back to lowest Lemurs in
+the lowest Eocene. The date of Eocene
+being fixed at 3,000,000, we have about
+2,100,000 years for this stage; assuming as
+much as five years for puberty, this results in
+420,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>3. From Lemures to Prototheria. The
+earliest known mammalian remains come
+from the Rhætic, or top formation of the
+Triassic epoch; allowing for the Rhætic
+only 100,000 years, we have to add the
+whole of the Jurassic and Cretaceous, in all
+about 5,500,000 years. Assuming three
+years for a generation, we get 1,800,000
+generations.</p>
+
+<p>4. From Prototheria to something like the
+Theromorpha at the bottom of the Triassic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">[Pg 152]</a></span>
+strata. A duration of 1,700,000 years divided
+by four gives 425,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>5. From Theromorpha to Proreptilia,
+represented by Eryops and Cricotus from
+the Lower Permian of Texas. Allowing
+1,000,000 years, each generation at four
+years, we obtain 250,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>6. From Proreptilia to Eotetrapoda, the
+first terrestrial Vertebrata, represented by
+something like the Stegocephali, the earliest
+of which are known from the Coal-measures.
+Assuming them to have come into existence
+at the bottom of the Coal-measures, for the
+duration of which we may guess 2,000,000
+years, we get, with four years' allowance for
+puberty, 500,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>7. From Eotetrapoda to a not yet separated
+or differentiated group of Crossopterygian
+and Dipnoan fishes, both of which
+are known from Devonian strata. The
+duration of the latter has been computed at
+4,000,000 years, which, with 1,000,000 for
+the Mountain Limestone formation, gives us<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">[Pg 153]</a></span>
+5,000,000 for this stage. Assuming, for the
+sake of round numbers, as much as five
+years for a generation, we get 1,000,000
+generations.</p>
+
+<p>8. Earliest stage, down to the first fish-like
+creatures. Teeth and spines indicating the
+existence of fishes are known from the Upper
+Silurian. By carrying the earliest fishes down
+to the bottom of the Silurian, with 2,700,000
+years' duration, and allowing three years for
+attaining puberty, the calculation results in
+900,000 generations.</p>
+
+<p>Further back we cannot go. We do not
+know of any Vertebrate remains from the
+Ordovician and Cambrian, which together
+represent 6,700,000 years, enough for at least
+half as many generations of Prochordate
+creatures. The pre-Cambrian or Laurentian
+epoch lies quite beyond the reach of calculation,
+nor have we any trustworthy fossil
+remains of living matter from these strata, to
+which, however, Haeckel and others refer the
+first beginnings of life.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">[Pg 154]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>All the above calculations are, of course,
+only approximate. What we do know is
+the existence of representatives of the stages,
+our proofs being the fossils; but when we refer
+the origin of the Eotetrapoda, for example, to
+the bottom and not somewhere to the middle
+of the Coal-measures, we are guessing
+merely. Alterations in the levels assumed
+for the various stage-representatives will, of
+course, alter the result of the number of
+generations; but the leading idea, as a
+whole, is not thereby upset. The fact
+remains that in the Upper Silurian we have
+fishes; from the Coal-measures onwards, fishes
+and Amphibia; since the Permian, fishes,
+Amphibia, and reptiles; since the end of the
+Trias these three classes and the Mammalia;
+and lastly, at least since the Plistocene, man
+himself. If Evolution is true at all, the
+transformation from early fish-like creatures
+to man has come about within these epochs.
+Being able to assign a time of duration to
+each of them, with an approximate total of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">[Pg 155]</a></span>
+21,000,000 years, we are also able to put
+the whole ancestral series to a test by expressing
+each great stage in generations. The
+result is very satisfactory. The whole enormous
+stretch from the lowest fish-like creatures
+to man has been resolved into more
+than 5,000,000 successive generations, and
+each of these means a little step forwards in
+onward Evolution.</p>
+
+<p>Nothing is to be gained for the understanding
+of our problem of Evolution if we
+multiply this enormous number of generations
+by ten or any other multiple. We
+are not able to conceive changes so small
+as those which necessarily have existed
+between Pithecanthropus and man if the
+whole striking difference is analysed into
+17,000 steps. Every one of these stages in
+the modifications of the muscles, the skeletal
+framework, increase of brain, shortening of
+the trunk, lengthening of the legs, improvement
+of the hands, loss of the hairy coat, etc.,
+is truly microscopical, imperceptible, just as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">[Pg 156]</a></span>
+the Evolutionist imagines the whole process
+to have been. Again, where is the difficulty
+implied by the change from an air-breathing,
+in many structural points half-amphibian, fish
+into a primitive land-crawling four-footed
+creature, if we are allowed to resolve the
+transformation into 1,000,000 stages? So far
+from there being any difficulty, rather does it
+appear questionable if so many infinitely small
+changes have been necessary to bring about
+this result.</p>
+
+<p>One thousand years make apparently no
+difference in the evolution of animals, nor
+does one second change the aspect of the
+hands on the face of a clock, nor did Julius
+Cæsar's commission of scientific men appreciate
+the error of about eleven minutes in
+the length of the year beyond its real value;
+but now the Russians are, owing to this
+neglect, nearly two weeks behind the civilized
+nations.</p>
+
+
+<p class="center">THE END.<br />
+
+<small>BILLING AND SONS, PRINTERS, GUILDFORD.</small></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</a></span></p>
+<hr class="chap"/>
+<div class="chapter-beginning"/>
+<p class="center">By PROFESSOR ERNST HAECKEL</p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>MONISM</big>;<br />
+<small>OR</small>,<br />
+The Confession of Faith of a Man of Science.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> Translated from the German by J. D. F. GILCHRIST.</p>
+
+<p class="center"><i>Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 1s. 6d. net.</i>
+</p>
+
+<p>'We may readily admit that Professor Haeckel has stated his case
+with the clearness and courage which we should expect of him, and
+that his lecture may be regarded as a fair and authoritative statement
+of the views now held by a large number of scientifically educated
+people.'&mdash;<i>Times.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The Monism, which is the substance of his faith, is thus defined by
+him: "Our conviction that there lives one spirit in all things, and that
+the whole cognizable world is constituted, and has been developed, in
+accordance with one common fundamental law." As the confession of
+a distinguished man of science, this little work deserves to be read.'&mdash;<i>North
+British Daily Mail.</i></p>
+
+<p>'This "Confession of Faith" was delivered by the great German
+scientist, its author, as an extemporaneous address at Altenburg rather
+more than two years ago. There are, no doubt, a large number of
+English readers who will welcome a translation, for this "connecting of
+religion and science" has long troubled many earnest students of
+modern science.'&mdash;<i>Publisher's Circular.</i></p>
+
+<p>'This is a little book of great daring, an example of the wild speculative
+flights of one of the very ablest and greatest of our contemporary
+men of science.'&mdash;<i>Aberdeen Free Press.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The address, whatever we may think of its conclusions, is, however,
+most interesting reading, and is admirably done into English by the
+translator.'&mdash;<i>Literary World.</i></p>
+
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</a></span></p>
+<hr class="tb"/>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>Demy 8vo., price 7s. 6d. net.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>SOURCES OF THE APOSTOLIC CANONS.</big></p>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>With a Treatise on the Origin of the Readership and other Lower Orders.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By Professor ADOLF HARNACK.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> Translated by LEONARD A. WHEATLEY.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>With an Introductory Essay on the Organization of the Early Church
+ and the Evolution of the Reader.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By the Rev. <span class="smcap">John Owen</span>, Author of 'Evenings with the Skeptics.'
+</p>
+
+<p>'Dr. Adolf Harnack is at the present time undoubtedly the leading liberal
+authority in Germany on matters connected with early Christian history.'&mdash;<i>The
+Times.</i></p>
+
+<p>'Those who are interested in early Church history know how to prize anything
+from the pen of Prof. Harnack. They will not be disappointed with the present
+paper, in which, with his accustomed learning and acute criticism, he annotates
+and comments upon the fragments of primitive church law which partly form the
+basis of the Apostolic Canons.'&mdash;<i>British Weekly.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The wide circulation of this volume would be of the happiest augury for a
+more scientific and worthy conception of the organization of the primitive
+Church.'&mdash;Dr. <span class="smcap">Marcus Dods</span> in <i>The Bookman</i>.</p>
+
+
+<hr class="tb"/>
+<p class="center"> <i>Crown 8vo., cloth, price 1s. 6d. net.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>CHRISTIANITY AND HISTORY.</big></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By ADOLF HARNACK.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> Translated, with the Author's sanction, by THOMAS BAILEY
+ SAUNDERS, with an Introductory Note.
+</p>
+
+<p>'It is highly interesting and full of thought. The short introductory note with
+which Mr. Saunders prefaces it is valuable for its information and excellent in its
+tone.'&mdash;<i>Athenæum.</i></p>
+
+<p>'A singularly able exposition and defence of Christianity, as seen in the newer
+light, by one of the most learned and acute "evangelical" critics of Germany.
+The essay is a masterly one.'&mdash;<i>Glasgow Herald.</i></p>
+
+<p>' ... We hope the lecture will be widely read.'&mdash;<i>Primitive Methodist
+Quarterly Review.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The lecture itself is weighty in its every word, and should be read and re-read
+by those desiring to have in a nutshell the central positions of modern Christianity.'&mdash;<i>Christian
+World.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">[Pg 159]</a></span></p>
+<hr class="tb"/>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>Third Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth, price 5s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH.</big></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By J. WELLHAUSEN,<br />
+<small>PROFESSOR AT MARBURG.</small>
+</p>
+
+<p>'This work is now issued for the third time as an independent
+treatise. It admirably epitomizes the subject, and exhibits on almost
+every page evidences of Professor Wellhausen's profound study.'&mdash;<i>Publishers'
+Circular.</i></p>
+
+<p>'We would only say that those who differ from his critical views
+will yet do well to study them, and to read this history in which
+he applies them. Its separate publication, in a handy form and at
+a moderate price, makes it generally accessible.'&mdash;<i>North British
+Daily Mail.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The publication in a separate form of Professor Wellhausen's
+article in the "Encyclopædia Britannica" on "Israel" will be very
+warmly welcomed by many readers.'&mdash;<i>Manchester Guardian.</i></p>
+
+<p>'We are very glad to welcome an edition of Professor Wellhausen's
+"Sketch of the History of Israel and Judah" in a convenient
+and handy form. This is the first time it has appeared in
+a separate form. It is already known to students; it ought now
+to become popular. It is based on the learned author's studies in
+Hebrew literature and history, and, though not controversial in form,
+it differs totally from orthodox presentations of the subject.'&mdash;<i>Westminster
+Review.</i></p>
+
+<p>'A sketch which has created such widespread and profound
+interest as this could not be kept in the pages of a voluminous
+encyclopædia. Wellhausen's words necessarily have exceptional
+importance, even in the esteem of those who differ from him <i>toto
+c&oelig;lo</i>.'&mdash;<i>Baptist Magazine.</i></p>
+
+<p>'The profound scholarship of the author does not elevate his
+writing above the interest of the general reader, and a vivid idea
+of the involved Jewish history is obtainable from this volume.'&mdash;<i>Christian
+Advocate.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</a></span></p>
+<hr class="tb"/>
+<p class="center"> <i>Demy 8vo., boards, price 3s. 6d. net.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>A CLASSIFICATION OF VERTEBRATA,</big><br />
+ RECENT AND EXTINCT.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> With Diagnoses and Definitions, a Chapter on Geographical
+ Distribution, and an Etymological Index.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> By HANS GADOW, M.A., <span class="smcap">Ph.D.</span>, F.R.S.,</p>
+
+<p class="center"><small>STRICKLAND CURATOR AND LECTURER ON ZOOLOGY TO THE UNIVERSITY,
+ CAMBRIDGE.</small>
+</p>
+
+<p>'At the end of his work Dr. Gadow adds a useful chapter on the geographical
+distribution of the Vertebrata, with a table showing the approximate number of
+the known recent species. He also gives a fanciful though striking calculation
+to show how some groups are still in the ascendant, while others are distinctly
+declining. The little volume is indeed a welcome addition to the biological
+student's library, and it deserves the wide circulation which its author's eminence
+is likely to ensure for it.'&mdash;<i>Natural Science.</i></p>
+
+<p>'It is a book, it need hardly be said, for the student; it is simply a list of the
+principal sub-divisions of backboned animals, with just as much definition as is
+needed. It may be regarded as an exceedingly concentrated extract of a full
+text-book of the vertebrates.'&mdash;<i>Daily Chronicle.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+<hr class="tb"/>
+
+
+<p class="center"> <i>Demy 8vo., cloth, price 21s.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center"><big>IN NORTHERN SPAIN.</big></p>
+
+<p class="center"> By Dr. HANS GADOW, M.A., <span class="smcap">Ph.D.</span>, F.R.S.</p>
+
+<p class="center"> <i>Containing Map and 89 Illustrations.</i>
+</p>
+
+<p>'Some years back "Wild Spain," one of the best books of its kind, made you
+desirous of knowing more of the country. And Hans Gadow has deepened this
+feeling in his excellent volume "In Northern Spain," and that to an enormous
+extent. Dwelling at inn or farm, or in their own tent, they saw the country as
+it has been seen but rarely, and they came to know the inhabitants as they can
+be known in no other fashion.'&mdash;<i>Black and White.</i></p>
+
+<p>'To persons visiting the provinces with which the author deals, this book will
+be invaluable, and will do more to point their attention to objects of interest than
+existing guide-books of Spain, most of which are out of date.'&mdash;<i>The Field.</i></p>
+
+<p>'About the best book of European travel that has appeared these many
+years.'&mdash;<i>Literary World.</i></p>
+
+<p class="center">LONDON: ADAM &amp; CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.</p>
+
+
+<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote">
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> See note,p.<a name="FNanchor_40" id="FNanchor_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40">80.</a> </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> See note, p.<a name="FNanchor_41" id="FNanchor_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41">89.</a></p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_42" id="FNanchor_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42">102</a>, <a name="FNanchor_43" id="FNanchor_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43">106</a>. </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a>
+See note, p. <a name="FNanchor_44" id="FNanchor_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44">80.</a> </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> <i>Perfect</i>, in the sense of highest stage of evolution, may
+seem a <i>petitio principii</i>. Leaving aside the consideration
+that no living creature is absolutely perfect, in the sense that
+its organization cannot become more efficient or proficient,
+we have here to deal with relative perfection of the whole
+organization. A fish or a snake is in its way more specialized
+than a mammal; but specialization does not necessarily
+mean height of development: it generally means life in a
+comparatively narrow groove. The acts of giving birth and
+nourishing the young with the mother's milk is a much
+higher stage than the act of laying eggs and letting them
+run their chance. The development of a hairy coat goes
+along with heightened temperature of the blood, subsequent
+greater independence of the surrounding temperature, and
+increased steady activity of the brain and other nerve-centres.
+The brain of the Mammalia, in its minute structure,
+is much more complex. This rule applies to some of
+the principal sense organs, chiefly the nose and the ear.
+The skeleton, not so much as a whole as in the various bones
+and joints, is more neatly finished, and built up more in
+conformity with 'scientific principles,' than is the case even
+with birds, in spite of their marvellous specialization. The
+same is the case with the vascular system, notably the heart
+and the veins, and with the excretory organs. In all of these
+many imperfections, still to be found in the other classes,
+have been corrected in Mammalia. The Primates take an
+easy first by their hands, and among them the apes and man
+himself by their brains.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> 'Die menschenähnlichen Affen und ihre Organisation
+im Vergleich zur menschlichen.' 1883.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> G. Schwalbe, 'In wiefern ist die menschliche Ohrmuschel ein
+rudimentäres Organ?'&mdash;In what Respects is the Human Outer Ear a
+Rudimentary Organ? (<i>Archiv f. Anatomie und Physiologie</i>, 1889).</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> Wiedersheim, 'Der Bau des Menschen als Zeugniss für
+seine Vergangenheit.' Freiburg, 1888. Translated: 'The
+Structure of Man an Index to his Past History.' London,
+1895.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> <i>Pithecanthropus erectus.</i> 'Eine menschenähnliche
+Uebergangsform aus Java' ('A Human-like Transitional
+Form'). Batavia, 1894.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> On the day after the delivery of this address Dr. Dubois
+exhibited the cranium of Pithecanthropus, from which he had
+removed the stony matrix which filled the inside, in order to
+examine the impression left by the cerebral convolutions.
+He was able to show that they also are very human, and
+more highly developed than those of the recent apes.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> L. Manouvier: 'Deuxième étude sur le Pithecanthropus erectus
+comme précurseur présumé de l'homme.' (<i>Bulletins de la Soc.
+d'Anthropologie de Paris</i>, 1895.)</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_45" id="FNanchor_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45">93.</a> </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_46" id="FNanchor_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46">87.</a> </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a>
+</p>
+
+<blockquote>
+
+<p><span class="smcap">F. Ameghino</span>: 'Contribucion al conocimiento de los
+mamíferos de la república Argentina.' In <i>Actas de
+la Academia nacional de Sciencias en Cordoba</i>,
+1889.&mdash;Another article in <i>Revista Argentina de Historia
+natural</i>. Buenos Aires, 1891.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">A. Gaudry</span>: 'Animaux fossiles et géologie de l'Attique.'
+1862.&mdash;'Le Dryopithèque.' <i>Mém. Soc. géol. de
+France</i>: 'Paléontologie.' 1890.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">O. Marsh</span>: 'Introduction and Succession of Vertebrate
+Life in America.' Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci.,
+Nashville, 1887.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">H. F. Osborn</span>: 'The Rise of the Mammalia in North
+America.' Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Madison,
+1893.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">L. Ruetimeyer</span>: 'Ueber die Herkunft unserer Thierwelt,'
+Basel, 1867.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">C. S. Forsyth Major</span>: 'Fossil Monkeys from Madagascar.'
+<i>Geological Magazine</i>, 1896.
+</p>
+<p>
+<span class="smcap">M. Schlosser</span>: 'Ueber die Beziehungen der ausgestorbenen
+Saeugethierfaunen und ihr Verhaeltniss zur Saeugethierfauna
+der Gegenwart.' Biolog. Centralblatt, 1888.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[161</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_47" id="FNanchor_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47">102</a>, <a name="FNanchor_48" id="FNanchor_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48">106</a>. </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[171</span></a>
+See note, p. <a name="FNanchor_49" id="FNanchor_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_49">97</a>.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> Wilhelm Bischoff of Munich: works on the history
+of the development of the rabbit, dog, guinea-pig, roe-deer.
+1840-1854.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[191</span></a>
+See note, p. <a name="FNanchor_50" id="FNanchor_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50">96</a>. </p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> 'Ueber die Entwicklung der einfachen Ascidien,' Mém.
+Acad. St. Petersbourg, vii. ser., tome x. (1866). Other
+papers in 'Archiv f. Mikroskop. Anatomie,' vii. (1871); xiii.
+(1877).</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a>
+See notes, p. <a name="FNanchor_51" id="FNanchor_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51">102</a>, <a name="FNanchor_52" id="FNanchor_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52">106</a>.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> Similar conditions seem to have prevailed among the
+Proreptilia; but in those of their descendants which have
+specialized into Reptiles and Birds the basi-occipital element
+becomes more and more predominant in that formation
+which ultimately leads to the apparently single condyle.
+Hence it is misleading to divide the Tetrapoda into the two
+main groups of Amphi-and Mono-condylia, and therefrom
+to conclude that the two-condyled Mammalia are more
+closely related to the likewise amphicondylous Amphibia
+than to the so-called monocondylous Reptiles.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> 'Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf
+Ceylon,' vols. 4 and 5. (With an atlas of 84 plates; 1893.)</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> 'Principles of Biology': 'The Factors of Organic Evolution';
+'The Inadequacy of Natural Selection.'</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> Abridged from Haeckel's 'Systematische Phylogenie
+der Vertebraten,' § 14.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> That this great work is now comparatively rare, although
+still in the second-hand market, may perhaps be urged in
+excuse of the fact of so many attempts made by many authors,
+both professional and amateur, to find fault with or to
+explain the principles of adaptation, variation, heredity,
+cænogenesis, phylogeny, etc., in complete ignorance that
+all these and many more fundamental questions were fully
+discussed more than thirty years ago in the 'Generelle Morphologie.'</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> James Croll: 'On Geological Time, and the Probable
+Date of the Glacial and Upper Miocene Period,' <i>Philos.
+Magazine</i>, xxxv., 1868, pp. 363-384; xxxvi., pp. 141-154;
+362-386.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> William Thomson: 'On the Secular Cooling of the
+Earth,' <i>Transact. R. S. Edinb.</i>, xxiii., 1864, pp. 157-169.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> 'Geological Time as indicated by the Sedimentary
+Rocks of North America.' <i>Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci.</i>,
+xlii., 1893, pp. 129-169.</p>
+
+<p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> Henry Shaler Williams, 'Geological Biology.' New
+York, 1895.</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
+<p class= "transnote">
+Transcriber's Notes<br />
+
+ Variations in spelling, punctuation and hyphenation have been retained
+ except in obvious cases of typographical errors.
+ Inconsistent hyphenation and spelling are as in the original.
+ The layout of the chart Ancestral Tree of The Mammalia has been changed
+ from the original to enhance clarity, the essential relationships have
+ been preserved.
+ The second reference to footnote 3, in the same paragraph as the first,
+ has been left blind as it is redundant.
+</p>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAST LINK ***
+
+***** This file should be named 44541-h.htm or 44541-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/4/4/5/4/44541/
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Les Galloway and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+ www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
+North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
+contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
+Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/old/44541-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/44541-h/images/cover.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd90753
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541-h/images/cover.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/44541-h/images/i_0231.jpg b/old/44541-h/images/i_0231.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52420cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541-h/images/i_0231.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/44541-h/images/i_0331.jpg b/old/44541-h/images/i_0331.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..263fc4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541-h/images/i_0331.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/44541.txt b/old/44541.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dca43af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3418 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Last Link
+ Our Present Knowledge of the Descent of Man
+
+Author: Ernst Haeckel
+
+Commentator: Hans Gadow
+
+Release Date: December 29, 2013 [EBook #44541]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAST LINK ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Les Galloway and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+ OUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE
+ DESCENT OF MAN
+
+ BY
+
+ ERNST HAECKEL
+ (JENA)
+
+ WITH NOTES AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES
+
+ BY
+
+ HANS GADOW, F.R.S.
+ (CAMBRIDGE)
+
+
+ LONDON
+ ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK
+ 1898
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+ PAGE
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+ INTRODUCTORY 1
+
+ COMPARATIVE ANATOMY 8
+
+ PALAEONTOLOGY 20
+
+ OTHER EVIDENCE 42
+
+ STAGES RECAPITULATED 47
+
+ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES:
+
+ LAMARCK, SAINT-HILAIRE, CUVIER, BAER,
+ MUELLER, VIRCHOW, COPE, KOELLIKER, GEGENBAUR,
+ HAECKEL 80
+
+ THEORY OF CELLS 115
+
+ FACTORS OF EVOLUTION 117
+
+ GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION 135
+
+
+
+ NOTE
+
+
+The address I delivered on August 26 at the Fourth International
+Congress of Zoology at Cambridge, 'On our Present Knowledge of the
+Descent of Man,' has, I find, from the high significance of the theme
+and the general importance of the questions connected with it, excited
+much interest, and has led to requests for its publication. Hence this
+volume, edited by my friend Dr. H. Gadow, my pupil in earlier days,
+who has not only revised the text, but has also enriched it by many
+valuable additions and notes.
+
+ ERNST HAECKEL.
+
+_Jena, December, 1898._
+
+
+
+
+ THE LAST LINK
+
+
+At the end of the nineteenth century, the age of 'natural science,' the
+department of knowledge that has made most progress is zoology. From
+zoology has arisen the study of transformism, which now dominates the
+whole of biology. Lamarck[1] laid its foundation in 1809, and forty
+years ago Charles Darwin obtained for it a recognition which is now
+universal. It is not my task to repeat the well-known principles of
+Darwinism. I am not concerned to explain the scientific value of the
+whole theory of descent. The whole of our biological study is pervaded
+by it. No general problem in zoology and botany, in anatomy and
+physiology, can be discussed without the question arising, How has this
+problem originated? What are the real causes of its development?
+
+ [1] See note, p. 80.
+
+This question was almost unknown seventy years ago, when Charles
+Darwin, the great reformer of biology, began his academical career at
+Cambridge as a student of theology. In the same year, 1828, Carl Ernst
+von Baer[2] published in Germany his classical work on the embryology
+of animals, the first successful attempt to elucidate by 'observation
+and reflection' the mysterious origin of the animal body from the
+egg, and to explain in every respect the 'history of the growing
+individuality.' Darwin at that time had no knowledge of this great
+advance, and he could not divine that forty years later embryology
+would be one of the strongest supports of his own life's work--of that
+very theory of transformism which, founded by Lamarck in the year of
+Darwin's birth, was accepted with enthusiasm by Charles's grandfather
+Erasmus. There is no doubt that of all the celebrated naturalists of
+the nineteenth century Darwin achieved the greatest success, and we
+should be justified in designating the last forty years as the Age of
+Darwin.
+
+ [2] See note, p. 89.
+
+In searching for the causes of this unexampled success, we must clearly
+separate three sets of considerations: first, the comprehensive reform
+of Lamarck's transformism, and its firm establishment by the many
+arguments drawn from modern biology; secondly, the construction of the
+new theory of selection, as established by Darwin, and independently
+by Alfred Wallace (a theory called Darwinism in the proper sense);
+thirdly, the deduction of anthropogeny, that most important conclusion
+of the theory of descent, the value of which far surpasses all the
+other truths in evolution.
+
+It is the third point of Darwin's theory that I shall discuss here; and
+I shall discuss it chiefly with the intention of examining critically
+the evidence and the different conclusions which at present represent
+our scientific knowledge of the descent of man and of the different
+stages of his animal pedigree.
+
+It is now generally admitted that this problem is the most important
+of all biological questions. Huxley was right when in 1863 he called
+it the question of questions for mankind. The problem which underlies
+all others, and is more deeply interesting than any other, is as
+to the place which man occupies in nature and his relations to the
+universe of things. 'Whence our race has come; what are the limits of
+our power over nature, and of nature's power over us; to what goal are
+we tending--these are the problems which present themselves anew and
+with undiminished interest to every man born into the world.' This
+impressive view was explained by Huxley thirty-five years ago in his
+three celebrated essays on 'Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature.' The
+first is entitled 'On the Natural History of the Man-like Apes'; the
+second, 'On the Relations of Man to the Lower Animals'; the third, 'On
+some Fossil Remains of Man.' Darwin himself felt the burden of these
+problems as much as Huxley; but in his chief work, 'On the Origin of
+Species,' in 1859, he had purposely only just touched them, suggesting
+that the theory of descent would shed light upon the origin of man and
+his history. Twelve years later, in his celebrated work on 'The Descent
+of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex,' Darwin discussed fully and
+ingeniously all the different sides of this 'question of questions'
+from the morphological, historical, physiological, and psychological
+points of view. As early as 1866 I myself had applied in the _Generelle
+Morphologie der Organismen_ the theory of transformism to anthropology,
+and had shown that the fundamental law of biogeny claims the same
+value for man as for all the other animals. The intimate causal
+connection between ontogeny and phylogeny, between the development of
+the individual and the history of its ancestors, enables us to gain
+a safe and certain knowledge of our ancestral series. I had at that
+time distinguished in this series ten chief degrees of vertebrate
+organization. I attributed the highest importance to the logical
+connection of anthropogeny with transformism. If the latter be true,
+the truth of the former is absolute. 'Our theory that man is descended
+from lower vertebrates, and immediately from apes or primates, is a
+case of special _deduction_ which follows with absolute certainty from
+the general _induction_ of the theory of descent.' The full proof and
+detailed explanation of this view was afterwards given in my 'History
+of Natural Creation,' and especially in my 'Anthropogeny.'[3] Lastly,
+it has received an ample scientific and critical foundation in the
+third part of my 'Systematic Phylogeny.'[3]
+
+ [3] See notes, pp. 102, 106
+
+During the forty years which have elapsed since Darwin's first
+publication of his theories an enormous literature, discussing the
+_general problems_ of transformism as well as its special application
+to man, has been published. In spite of the wide divergence of the
+different views, all agree in one main point: the natural development
+of man cannot be separated from general transformism. There are only
+two possibilities. Either all the various species of animals and
+plants have been created independently by supernatural forces (and
+in this case the creation of man also is a miracle); or the species
+have been produced in a natural way by transmutation, by adaptation
+and progressive heredity (and in this case man also is descended from
+other vertebrates, and immediately from a series of primates). We are
+absolutely convinced that only the latter theory is fully scientific.
+To prove its truth, we have to examine critically the strength of the
+different arguments claimed for it.
+
+
+
+
+ I.
+
+
+First, we have to consider the relative place which comparative
+anatomy concedes to man in the 'natural system' of animals, for the
+true value of our 'natural classification' is based upon its meaning
+as a pedigree. All the minor and major groups of the system--the
+classes, legions, orders, families, genera, and species--are only
+different branches of the same pedigree. For man himself, his place
+in the pedigree has been fixed since Lamarck,[4] in 1801, defined the
+group of vertebrates. The most perfect[5] of these are the Mammalia;
+and at the head of this class stands the order of Primates, in which
+Linnaeus, in 1735, united four 'genera'--Homo, Simia, Lemur, and
+Vespertilio. If we exclude the last-named, the Chiroptera of modern
+zoology, there remain three natural groups of Primates--the Lemures,
+the Simiae, and the Anthropi or Hominidae. This is the classification of
+the majority of zoologists; but if we compare man with the two chief
+groups of monkeys--the Eastern monkeys (or Catarrhinae) and the Western
+or American monkeys (Platyrrhinae)--there can be no doubt that the
+former group is much more closely related to man than is the latter.
+In the natural order of the Catarrhinae we find united a long series
+of lower and higher forms. The lowest, the Cynopitheci, appear still
+closely related to the Platyrrhinae and to the Lemures; while, on the
+other hand, the tailless apes (Anthropomorphae) approach man through
+their higher organization. Hence one of our best authorities on the
+Primates, Robert Hartmann,[6] proposed to subdivide the whole order of
+the Simiae into three groups: (1) Primarii, man together with the other
+Anthropomorphae, or tailless apes; (2) Simiae, all the other monkeys; (3)
+Prosimiae, or Lemurs. This arrangement has received strong support from
+the interesting discovery by Selenka that the peculiar placentation
+of the human embryo is the same as in the great apes, and different
+from that of all the other monkeys. Our choice between these different
+classifications of Primates is best determined by the important thesis
+of Huxley, in which, in 1863, he carried out a most careful and
+critical comparison of all the anatomical gradations within this order.
+In my opinion, this ingenious thesis--which I have called the Huxleyan
+Law, or the 'Pithecometra-thesis of Huxley'--is of the utmost value.
+It runs as follows: 'Thus, whatever system of organs be studied, the
+comparison of their modifications in the ape-series leads to one and
+the same result--that the structural differences which separate man
+from the gorilla and the chimpanzee are not so great as those which
+separate the gorilla from the lower apes.' If we accept the Huxleyan
+law without prejudice, and apply it to the natural classification of
+the Primates, we must concede that man's place is within the order
+of the Simiae. On examining this relation with care, and judging
+with logical persistence, we may even go a step further. Instead of
+the wider conception of 'Simiae,' we must use the restricted term of
+Catarrhinae, and our Pithecometra-thesis has then to be formulated
+as follows: _The comparative anatomy of all organs of the group of
+Catarrhine Simiae leads to the result that the morphological differences
+between man and the great apes are not so great as are those between
+the man-like apes and the lowest Catarrhinae_. In fact, it is very
+difficult to show why man should not be classed with the large apes in
+the same zoological family. We all know a man from an ape; but it is
+quite another thing to find differences which are absolute and not of
+degree only. Speaking generally, we may say that man alone combines the
+four following features: (1) Erect walk; (2) extremities differentiated
+accordingly; (3) articulate speech; (4) higher reasoning power. Speech
+and reason are obviously relative distinctions only--the direct result
+of more brains and more brain-power, the so-called mental faculties.
+The erect walk is not an absolutely distinguishing characteristic: the
+large apes likewise walk on their feet only, supporting their bodies
+by touching the ground with the backs of their hands--in fact, with
+their knuckles--and this is a mode of progression very different from
+that of the tailed monkeys, which walk upon the palms of their hands.
+There are, however, two obvious differences in the development of the
+muscles. In man alone the gastrocnemius and the soleus muscle are thick
+enough to form the calf of the leg, and the glutaeus maximus is enlarged
+into the buttocks. A fourth glutaeal muscle occurs occasionally in
+man, while it is constantly present in apes as the so-called musculus
+scansorius. Concerning the muscles of the whole body, we cannot do
+better than quote Testut's summary: 'The mass of recorded observations
+upon the muscular anomalies in man is so great, and the agreement of
+many of these with the condition normal in apes is so marked, that the
+gap which usually separates the muscular system of man from that of the
+apes appears to be completely bridged over.'
+
+ [4] See note, p. 80.
+
+ [5] _Perfect_, in the sense of highest stage of evolution, may seem a
+ _petitio principii_. Leaving aside the consideration that no living
+ creature is absolutely perfect, in the sense that its organization
+ cannot become more efficient or proficient, we have here to deal with
+ relative perfection of the whole organization. A fish or a snake is in
+ its way more specialized than a mammal; but specialization does not
+ necessarily mean height of development: it generally means life in a
+ comparatively narrow groove. The acts of giving birth and nourishing
+ the young with the mother's milk is a much higher stage than the act
+ of laying eggs and letting them run their chance. The development of
+ a hairy coat goes along with heightened temperature of the blood,
+ subsequent greater independence of the surrounding temperature, and
+ increased steady activity of the brain and other nerve-centres. The
+ brain of the Mammalia, in its minute structure, is much more complex.
+ This rule applies to some of the principal sense organs, chiefly the
+ nose and the ear. The skeleton, not so much as a whole as in the
+ various bones and joints, is more neatly finished, and built up more
+ in conformity with 'scientific principles,' than is the case even with
+ birds, in spite of their marvellous specialization. The same is the
+ case with the vascular system, notably the heart and the veins, and
+ with the excretory organs. In all of these many imperfections, still
+ to be found in the other classes, have been corrected in Mammalia. The
+ Primates take an easy first by their hands, and among them the apes and
+ man himself by their brains.
+
+ [6] 'Die menschenaehnlichen Affen und ihre Organisation im Vergleich zur
+ menschlichen.' 1883.
+
+There are, for example, the muscles of the ear. In most people the
+majority, or even all of them, are no longer movable at will, while in
+the apes they are still in use. The important point, however, is that
+these muscles are still present in man, although often in a reduced
+condition. They are the following: (1) Musculus auricularis anterior
+or attrahens auris, which is frequently much reduced and no longer
+reaches the ear at all, being then absolutely useless; (2) Musculus
+auricularis superior or attollens auris, more constant than the former;
+(3) Musculus auricularis posterior or retrahens auris, likewise often
+functional. Occasionally smaller slips differentiated from these
+three muscles are present, and as so-called intrinsic muscles are
+restricted to the ear itself; their function is, or was, that of
+curling up or opening the external ear.
+
+[Illustration: OUTLINES OF THE LEFT EAR OF--
+
+1. _Lemur macaco_; 2. _Macacus rhesus_, the Rhesus monkey; 3.
+Cercopithecus, a macaque; 4. human embryo of six months; 5. man, with
+Darwin's point well retained: the dotted outline is that of the ear of
+a baboon; 6. orang-utan (after G. Schwalbe):[7] ^x the original tip of
+the ear; 7. human ear with the principal muscles.
+
+ [7] G. Schwalbe, 'In wiefern ist die menschliche Ohrmuschel ein
+ rudimentaeres Organ?'--In what Respects is the Human Outer Ear a
+ Rudimentary Organ? (_Archiv f. Anatomie und Physiologie_, 1889).]
+
+In connection with the ear, I may touch upon another interesting
+and most suggestive little feature which is present in many
+individuals--namely, 'Darwin's point.' This is the last remnant of the
+original tip of the ear, before the outer, upper, and hinder rim became
+doubled up or folded in. It is a feature quite useless, and absolutely
+impossible of interpretation, excepting as the vestige of such previous
+ancestral conditions as are normal in the monkeys.
+
+In some cases the reduction of muscles has proceeded further in apes
+than in man--for example, the muscles of the little toe. Another
+instance is afforded by the coccyx or vestige of the tail; this is
+still furnished with muscles which are now in man, as well as in
+the apes, quite useless, and vary considerably with every sign of
+degeneration, most so in the orang-utan.
+
+Darwin has mentioned the frequent action of the 'snarling muscle,' by
+which, in sneering, our upper canine teeth are exposed, like those of a
+dog prepared to fight.
+
+Monkeys and apes possess vocal sacs, especially large in the
+orang-utan; survivals of them, although no longer used, persist in man
+in the shape of a pair of small diverticula, the pouches of Morgagni,
+between the true and the false vocal cords.
+
+'In the native Australians, the dental formula appears least removed
+from the hypothetical original type, for in it are still found complete
+rows of splendid teeth, with powerfully-developed canines and molars,
+the latter being either uniform, or even increasing in size, as we
+proceed backwards, in such a way that the wisdom tooth is the largest
+of the series. This is decidedly a pithecoid characteristic which is
+always found in apes. The upper incisors of the Malay, apart from their
+prognathous disposition, have occasionally a distinctly pithecoid
+form, their anterior surface being convex, and their lingual surface
+slightly concave. The ancestors of Europeans seem to have had the same
+form of teeth, for the oldest existing fragments of skulls from the
+Mammoth age (_e.g._, the jaws from La Naulette, in Belgium) reveal
+tooth-forms which must be classed with those of the lowest races of
+to-day.'[8]
+
+ [8] Wiedersheim, 'Der Bau des Menschen als Zeugniss fuer seine
+ Vergangenheit.' Freiburg, 1888. Translated: 'The Structure of Man an
+ Index to his Past History.' London, 1895.
+
+Now we are able to apply this fundamental Pithecometra-thesis directly
+to the classification of the Primates and to the phylogeny of man,
+which is intimately connected with it, because in this order, as in
+all the other groups of animals, the natural system is the clear
+expression of true phylogenetic affinity. Four results follow from our
+thesis: (1) The Primates, as the highest legion or order of mammals,
+form one natural, monophyletic group. All the Lemures, Simiae, and
+Homines descend from one common ancestral form, from a hypothetical
+'Archiprimas.' (2) The Lemures are the older and lower of the natural
+groups of the Primates; they stand between the oldest Placentalia
+(Prochoriata) and the true Simiae. (3) All the Catarrhinae, or Eastern
+Simiae, form one natural monophyletic group. Their hypothetical
+common ancestor, the Archipithecus, may have descended directly or
+indirectly from a branch of the Lemures. (4) Man is descended directly
+from one series of extinct Catarrhine ancestors. The more recent
+ancestors of this series were tailless anthropoids (similar to the
+Anthropopithecus), with five sacral vertebrae. The more remote ancestors
+were tailed Cercopitheci, with three or four sacral vertebrae.
+
+These four theses possess, in my opinion, absolute certainty.
+They are independent of all future anatomical, embryological, and
+palaeontological discoveries which may possibly throw more light upon
+the details of our phyletic anthropogenesis.
+
+
+
+
+ II.
+
+
+The next question is, how the facts of palaeontology agree with these
+most important results of comparative anatomy and ontogeny. The fossils
+are the true historical 'medals of creation,' the palpable evidence of
+the historical succession of all those innumerable organic forms which
+have peopled the globe for many millions of years. Here the question
+arises, If the known fossil specimens of Mammalia, and particularly
+of Primates, give proof of these Pithecometra-theses, do they confirm
+directly the descent of man from ape-like creatures? The answer to this
+question is, in my opinion, affirmative.
+
+It is true that the gaps in the palaeontological evidence, here as
+elsewhere, are many and keenly felt. In the order of the Primates
+they are greater than in many other orders, chiefly because of the
+arboreal life of our ancestors. The explanation is very simple. It is
+really due to a long chain of favourable coincidences if the skeleton
+of a vertebrate, covered as it was with flesh and skin, and containing
+still more perishable viscera, is petrified at all. The body may be
+devoured by other creatures, and its bones scattered about; or it rots
+away and crumbles to pieces. Many animals hide in thick undergrowth
+when death approaches them; and, leading an almost entirely arboreal
+life, the Primates are especially likely to disappear without being
+fossilized. It is only when the body is quickly covered with sand, or
+is embedded in suitable lime or silica containing mud, that the process
+of petrifaction can come to pass. Even then it is only by great good
+luck that we come across such a fossil. Very few countries have been
+searched systematically, and the areas that have been searched amount
+to little in comparison with the whole surface of the land, even if we
+leave out of account the fact that more than two-thirds of the globe
+are covered by water.
+
+These deplorable deficiencies of empirical palaeontology are balanced
+on the other side by a growing number of positive facts, which possess
+an inestimable value in human phylogeny. The most interesting and most
+important of these is the celebrated fossil _Pithecanthropus erectus_,
+discovered in Java in 1894 by Dr. Eugene Dubois.[9] Three years ago
+this now famous ape-like man provoked an animated discussion at the
+third International Zoological Congress at Leyden. I may therefore
+be allowed to say a few words as to its scientific significance.
+Unfortunately, the fossil remains of this creature are very scanty: the
+skull-cap, a femur, and two teeth. It is obviously impossible to form
+from these scanty remains a complete and satisfactory reconstruction of
+this remarkable Pliocene Primate.
+
+[9] _Pithecanthropus erectus._ 'Eine menschenaehnliche Uebergangsform
+aus Java' ('A Human-like Transitional Form'). Batavia, 1894.
+
+The more important points are the following: The remains in question
+rested upon a conglomerate which lies upon a bed of marine marl and
+sand of Pliocene age. Together with the bones of Pithecanthropus were
+found those of Stegodon, Leptobos, Rhinoceros, Sus, Felis, Hyaena,
+Hippopotamus, Tapir, Elephas, and a gigantic Pangolin. It is remarkable
+that the first two of these genera are now extinct, and that neither
+hippopotamus nor hyaena exists any longer in the Oriental region. If we
+may judge from these fossil remains, the bones of Pithecanthropus are
+not younger than the oldest Pleistocene, and probably belong to the
+upper Pliocene. The teeth are like those of man. The femur, also, is
+very human, but shows some resemblances to that of the gibbons. Its
+size, however, indicates an animal which stood when erect not less
+than 5 feet 6 inches high. The skull-cap also is very human, but with
+very prominent eyebrow ridges, like those of the famous Neanderthal
+cranium. It is certainly not that of an idiot. It had an estimated
+cranial capacity of about 1,000 cubic centimetres--that is to say, much
+more than that of the largest ape, which possesses not more than 600
+c.c. The crania of female Australians and Veddahs measure not more than
+1,100, some even less than 1,000 c.c.; but, as these Veddah women stand
+only about 4 feet 9 inches high, the computed cranial capacity of the
+much taller Pithecanthropus is comparatively very low indeed.[10]
+
+ [10] On the day after the delivery of this address Dr. Dubois exhibited
+ the cranium of Pithecanthropus, from which he had removed the stony
+ matrix which filled the inside, in order to examine the impression left
+ by the cerebral convolutions. He was able to show that they also are
+ very human, and more highly developed than those of the recent apes. [
+ Illustration: The upper figure represents the outlines
+ of the skull of Pithecanthropus, as restored by Manouvier.[11] The
+ lower figure shows the comparative size and shape of Pithecanthropus,
+ the Neanderthal skull, a specimen of the Cro-Magnon race of neolithic
+ France, and a Young Chimpanzee before the full development of the
+ supraorbital crests.]
+
+ [11] L. Manouvier: 'Deuxieme etude sur le Pithecanthropus erectus comme
+ precurseur presume de l'homme.' (_Bulletins de la Soc. d'Anthropologie
+ de Paris_, 1895.)
+
+The final result of the long discussion at Leyden was that, of twelve
+experts present, three held that the fossil remains belonged to a low
+race of man; three declared them to be those of a man-like ape of great
+size; the rest maintained that they belonged to an intermediate
+form, which directly connected primitive man with the anthropoid
+apes. This last view is the right one, and accords with the laws of
+logical inference. _Pithecanthropus erectus_ of Dubois is truly a
+Pliocene remainder of that famous group of highest Catarrhines which
+were the immediate pithecoid ancestors of man. He is, indeed, the
+long-searched-for 'missing link,' for which, in 1866, I myself had
+proposed the hypothetical genus Pithecanthropus, species Alalus.
+
+It must, however, be admitted that this opinion is still strongly
+combated by some distinguished authorities. At the Leyden Congress it
+was attacked by the illustrious pathologist Rudolf Virchow.[12] He,
+however, is one of the minority of leading men of science who set
+themselves to refute the theory of Evolution in every possible way. For
+thirty years he has defended the thesis: 'It is quite certain that man
+is not a descendant of apes.' He declares any intermediate form to be
+unimaginable save in a dream.
+
+ [12] See Notes, p. 93.
+
+Virchow went to the Leyden Congress with the set purpose of disproving
+that the bones found by Dubois belonged to a creature which linked
+together apes and man. First, he maintained that the skull was that
+of an ape, while the thigh belonged to man. This insinuation was at
+once refuted by the expert palaeontologists, who declared that without
+the slightest doubt the bones belonged to one and the same individual.
+Next, Virchow explained that certain exostoses or growths observable on
+the thigh proved its human nature, since only under careful treatment
+the patient could have healed the original injury. Thereupon Professor
+Marsh, the celebrated palaeontologist, exhibited a number of thigh-bones
+of wild monkeys which showed similar exostoses and had healed without
+hospital treatment. As a last argument the Berlin pathologist declared
+that the deep constriction behind the upper margin of the orbits
+proved that the skull was that of an ape, as such never occurred in
+man. It so happened that a few weeks later Professor Nehring of Berlin
+demonstrated exactly the same formation on a human prehistoric skull
+received by him from Santos, in Brazil.
+
+Virchow was, in fact, just as unlucky in Leyden in his fight with our
+pliocene ancestor as he had been unfortunate in his opinion on the
+famous skulls of Neanderthal, Spy, La Naulette, etc., every one of which
+he explained as a pathological abnormality. It would be a very curious
+coincidence indeed if all these and other fossil human remains were
+those of idiots or otherwise abnormal individuals, provided they are
+old and low enough in their organization to be of phylogenetic value to
+the unbiassed zoologist.
+
+As the sworn adversary of Evolution, transformism, and Darwinism in
+particular, but a believer in the constancy of species, the great and
+renowned pathologist has been driven to the incredible contention that
+all variations of organic forms are pathological.
+
+Four years ago, as honorary president of the Anthropological Congress
+at Vienna, he attacked Darwinism in the severest manner, and declared
+that 'man may be as well descended from the elephant or from the sheep
+as from the ape.' Such attacks on the theory of transformism indicate a
+failure to understand the principles of the theory of Evolution and to
+appreciate the significance of palaeontology, comparative anatomy, and
+ontogeny.
+
+The thousands of other objections which have been made during the last
+forty years (chiefly by outsiders) may be passed over in silence. They
+do not require serious refutation. In spite of, or perhaps because of,
+these attacks, the theory of Evolution stands established more firmly
+than ever.
+
+It is easy for the outsider to exult over the difficulties which our
+problem implies--difficulties which we who have given our lives to the
+study understand likewise, and try our best not only to bridge over,
+but also to point out. Anyhow, we do not conceal them; while those who
+reject the explanation offered by Evolution make the most of the gaps,
+and pass silently over the far more numerous points favourable to our
+theory.
+
+How fruitful during the last thirty years the astonishing progress in
+our palaeontological knowledge has been for our Pithecometra-thesis is
+best shown by a short glance at the growth of our knowledge of fossil
+Primates. Cuvier,[13] the founder of palaeontology, continued up to the
+time of his death, in 1832, to assert that fossil remains of monkeys
+and lemurs did not exist. The only skull of a fossil lemuroid which
+he described (namely, Adapis) he declared to be that of an ungulate.
+Not until 1836 were the first fragments of extinct monkeys found in
+India; it was two years later, near Athens, that the skeleton of
+_Mesopithecus penthelicus_ was discovered. Other remains of lemurs were
+found in 1862. But during the last twenty years the number of fossil
+Primates has been augmented by the remarkable discoveries of Gaudry,
+Filhol, Milne Edwards, Seeley, Schlosser, and others in Europe; of
+Marsh, Cope, Osborn, Leidy, Ameghino, in South America; and Forsyth
+Major in Madagascar.[14] These tertiary remains, chiefly of Eocene and
+Miocene date, fill many gaps between existing genera of Primates, and
+afford us quite a clear insight into the phyletic development of this
+order during the millions of years of the Caenozoic age.
+
+ [13] See notes, p. 87.
+
+ [14]
+ F. AMEGHINO: 'Contribucion al conocimiento de los mamiferos
+ de la republica Argentina.' In _Actas de la Academia nacional de
+ Sciencias en Cordoba_, 1889.--Another article in _Revista Argentina de
+ Historia natural_. Buenos Aires, 1891.
+
+ A. GAUDRY: 'Animaux fossiles et geologie de l'Attique.'
+ 1862.--'Le Dryopitheque.' _Mem. Soc. geol. de France_:
+ 'Paleontologie.' 1890.
+
+ O. MARSH: 'Introduction and Succession of Vertebrate Life in
+ America.' Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Nashville, 1887.
+
+ H. F. OSBORN: 'The Rise of the Mammalia in North America.'
+ Address, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Madison, 1893.
+
+ L. RUETIMEYER: 'Ueber die Herkunft unserer Thierwelt,' Basel,
+ 1867.
+
+ C. S. FORSYTH MAJOR: 'Fossil Monkeys from Madagascar.'
+ _Geological Magazine_, 1896.
+
+ M. SCHLOSSER: 'Ueber die Beziehungen der ausgestorbenen
+ Saeugethierfaunen und ihr Verhaeltniss zur Saeugethierfauna der
+ Gegenwart.' Biolog. Centralblatt, 1888.
+
+The most important difference between the two groups of existing
+monkeys is indicated by their dentition. Adult man possesses, like
+all the other Catarrhine Simiae, thirty-two teeth, whilst the American
+monkeys (the Platyrrhinae) have thirty-six teeth--namely, one pair of
+premolars more in the upper and lower jaws. Comparative odontology
+leads us to the phylogenetic conclusion that this number has been
+produced by reduction from a still older form with forty-four teeth.
+This typical dental formula (three incisors, one canine, four
+premolars, and three molars, in each half-jaw) is common to all those
+most important older mammals which in the beginning of the Eocene
+period constituted the four large groups of Lemuravida, Condylarthra,
+Esthonychida, and Ictopsida. These are the four ancestral groups
+of the four main orders of Placentalia--namely, of the Primates,
+Ungulata, Rodentia, and Carnassia. They seem to be so closely related
+by their primitive organization that they may be united in one common
+super-order, Prochoriata.
+
+With a considerable degree of probability, we are led to formulate
+the further hypothesis that all the orders of Placentalia--from the
+lowest Prochoriata upwards to man--have descended from some unknown
+common ancestor living in the Cretaceous period, and that this oldest
+placental form originated from some Jurassic group of marsupials.
+
+Among these numerous fossil Lemures which have been discovered within
+the last twenty years, there exist, indeed, all the connecting forms
+of the older series of Primates, all the 'missing links' sought for by
+comparative odontology.
+
+The oldest Lemures of the tertiary age are the Eocene Pachylemures,
+or Hyopsodina. They possess the complete dentition of the
+Prochoriata--namely, forty-four teeth (3.1.4.3/3.1.4.3). Then follow
+the Eocene Palaeolemures, or Adapida, with forty teeth, they having lost
+one pair of incisors in each jaw. To these are attached the younger
+Autolemures, or Stenopida, with thirty-six teeth, they thus possessing
+already the same dentition as the Platyrrhinae. The characteristic
+dentition of the Catarrhinae is derived from this formula by the loss of
+another premolar.
+
+These relations are so clear and so closely connected with a
+gradual transformation of the whole skull, and with the progressive
+differentiation of the Primate-form, that we are justified in saying
+that the pedigree of the Primates, from the oldest Eocene Lemures
+upwards to man, is now so well known, its principal features so firmly
+fixed within the Tertiary age, that there is no missing link whatever.
+
+Quite different, and much more incomplete, is the palaeontological
+evidence, if we go further back into the Secondary or Mesozoic age,
+and look there for the older ancestors of the mammalian series. There
+we meet everywhere with wide gaps, and the scarce fragments of fossil
+Mesozoic mammals (excessively rare in the Cretaceous formation) are too
+poor to permit definite conclusions as to their systematic position.
+Indeed, comparative anatomy and ontogeny lead us to the hypothesis
+that the oldest Cretaceous Mammalia--the Prochoriata--are descended
+from Jurassic marsupials, and these again from Monotremes. We may
+also suppose with high probability that among the unknown Cretaceous
+Prochoriata there have been Lemuravida and forms intermediate between
+these and the Jurassic Amphitheriidae, and that these marsupials in
+their turn are descendants of Pantotheria or similar monotreme-like
+creatures of the Triassic age. Any certain evidence for these
+hypotheses is at present still wanting. One important fact, however,
+is established--namely, that these interesting and oldest Mammalia--the
+Pantotheria of Marsh, the Triassic Dromatheriidae, and the Jurassic
+Triconodontidae of Osborn--were small insectivorous mammals with a very
+primitive organization. Probably they were Monotremes, and may be
+derived directly from Permian Sauromammalia, an ill-defined mixture of
+Mammalia and Reptilia.
+
+This generalized characteristic supports our view that _the whole
+class of Mammalia is monophyletic_, and that all its members, from
+the oldest Monotremes upwards to man, have descended from one common
+ancestor living in the older Triassic, or perhaps in the Permian,
+age. To acquire full conviction of this important conception, we have
+only to think of the hair and the glands of our human skin, of our
+diaphragm, the heart and the blood corpuscles without a nucleus, our
+skull with its squamoso-mandibular articulation. All these singular
+and striking modifications of the vertebrate organization are common
+to mammals, and distinguish them clearly from the other Craniota. This
+characteristic combination and correlation proves that they have been
+developed only _once_ in the history of the vertebrate stem, and that
+they have been transferred by heredity from one common ancestor to all
+the members of the class of Mammalia.
+
+The next step, as we trace our human phylogeny to its origin, leads us
+further back into the lower Vertebrata, into that obscure Palaeozoic
+age the immeasurable length of which (much greater than that of the
+Mesozoic) may, according to one of the newest geological calculations,
+have comprised about one thousand millions of years.[15]
+
+ [15] See note, 'Geological Time and Evolution' p. 134.
+
+The first important fact we have to face here is the complete absence
+of mammalian remains. Instead of these we find in the later Palaeozoic
+period, the Permian, air-breathing _reptiles_ as the earliest
+representatives of Amniota. They belong to the most primitive order
+of that class, the Tocosauria; and besides them there were the
+Theromorpha, which approach the Mammalia in a remarkable manner. These
+reptiles in turn were preceded, in the Carboniferous period, by true
+Amphibia, most of them belonging to the armour-clad Stegocephali.
+These interesting Progonamphibia were the oldest Tetrapoda, the first
+vertebrates which had adapted themselves to the terrestrial mode of
+life; in them the swimming fin of fishes and Dipneusta was transformed
+into the pentadactyle extremities characteristic of quadrupeds.
+
+To appreciate the high importance of this metamorphosis, we need only
+compare the skeleton of our own human limbs with that of the living
+Amphibia. We find in the latter the same characteristic composition as
+in man: the same shoulder and pelvic girdle; the same single bone, the
+humerus or the femur, followed by the same pair of bones in the forearm
+and leg; then the same skeletal elements composing the wrist and the
+ankle regions; and, lastly, the same five fingers and toes.
+
+The arrangement of these bones, peculiar and often complicated, but
+everywhere essentially the same in all the Tetrapoda, is a striking
+evidence that man is a descendant from the oldest pentadactyle Amphibia
+of the Carboniferous period. In man the pentadactyle type has been
+better preserved by constant heredity than in many other Mammalia,
+notably the Ungulata.
+
+The oldest Carboniferous Amphibia, the armour-clad Stegocephali, and
+especially the remarkable Branchiosauri discovered by Credner, are
+now regarded by all competent zoologists as the indubitable common
+ancestral group of all Tetrapoda, comprising both Amphibia and Amniota.
+But whence this most remote group of Tetrapoda? That difficult question
+is answered by the marvellous progress of modern palaeontology, and
+the answer is in complete harmony with the older results arrived
+at by comparative anatomy and ontogeny. Thirty-four years ago Carl
+Gegenbaur,[16] the great living master of comparative anatomy, had
+demonstrated in a series of works how the skeletal parts of the various
+classes of Vertebrata, especially the skull and the limbs, still
+represent a continuous scale of phyletic gradations. Apart from the
+Cyclostomes, there are the fishes, and among them the Elasmobranchi
+(sharks and rays), which have best preserved the original structure in
+all its essential parts of organization. Closely connected with the
+Elasmobranchi are the Crossopterygii, and with these the Dipneusta or
+Dipnoi. Among the latter the highest importance attaches to the ancient
+Australian Ceratodus. Its organization and development is now, at last,
+becoming well known. This transitional group of Dipnoi, 'fishes with
+lungs' but without pentadactyle limbs, is the morphological bridge
+which joins the Ganoids and the oldest Amphibia. With this chain
+of successive groups of Vertebrata, constructed anatomically, the
+palaeontological facts agree most satisfactorily. Selachians and Ganoids
+existed in the Silurian times, Dipnoi in the Devonian, Amphibia in the
+Carboniferous, Reptilia in the Permian, Mammalia in the Trias. These
+are historical facts of first rank. They connote in the most convincing
+manner that remarkable ascending scale in the series of vertebrates
+for our knowledge of which we are indebted to the works of Cuvier and
+Blainville, Meckel, Johannes Mueller and Gegenbaur, Owen and Huxley.
+The historical succession of the classes and orders of the Vertebrata
+in the course of untold millions of years is definitely fixed by the
+concordance of those leading works, and this invaluable acquisition is
+much more important for the foundation of our human pedigree than would
+be a complete series of all possible skeletons of Primates.
+
+ [16] See note, p. 97.
+
+Greater and more frequent difficulties arise if we penetrate further
+into the most remote part of the human phylogeny, and attempt to derive
+the vertebrate stem from an older stem of invertebrate ancestors. None
+of those had a skeleton which could be petrified; and the same remark
+applies to the lowest classes of Vertebrata--to the Cyclostomes and
+the Acrania. Palaeontology, therefore, can tell us nothing about them;
+and we are limited to the other two great documents of phylogeny--the
+results of comparative anatomy and ontogeny. The value of their
+evidence is, however, so great that every competent zoologist can
+perceive the most important features of the most remote portion of our
+phylogeny.
+
+Here the first place belongs to the invaluable results which modern
+comparative ontogeny has gained by the aid of the biogenetic law or
+the theory of recapitulation. The foundation-stones of vertebrate
+embryology had been laid by the works of Von Baer, Bischoff,[17] Remak,
+and Koelliker;[18] but the clearest light was thrown upon it by the
+famous discoveries of Kowalevsky[19] in 1866. He proved the identity
+of the first developmental stages of Amphioxus and the Ascidians, and
+thereby confirmed the divination of Goodsir, who had already announced
+the close affinity of Vertebrates and Tunicates. The acknowledgment of
+this affinity has proved of increasing importance, and has abolished
+the erroneous hypothesis that the Vertebrata may have arisen from
+Annelids or from other Articulata. Meanwhile, from 1860 to 1872, I
+myself had been studying the development of the Spongiae, Medusae,
+Siphonophora, and other Coelenterata. Their comparison led me to the
+statements embodied in the 'Gastraeatheorie,' the first abstract of
+which was published in 1872 in my monograph of the Calcispongiae.
+
+ [17] Wilhelm Bischoff of Munich: works on the history of the
+ development of the rabbit, dog, guinea-pig, roe-deer. 1840-1854.
+
+ [18] See note, p. 96.
+
+ [19] 'Ueber die Entwicklung der einfachen Ascidien,' Mem. Acad. St.
+ Petersbourg, vii. ser., tome x. (1866). Other papers in 'Archiv f.
+ Mikroskop. Anatomie,' vii. (1871); xiii. (1877).
+
+These ideas were carried on and expanded during the subsequent ten
+years by the help of many excellent embryologists--first of all by E.
+Ray Lankester and Francis Balfour. The most fruitful result of these
+widely extended researches was the conclusion that the first stages of
+embryonic development are essentially the same in all the different
+Metazoa, and that we may derive from these facts certain views on
+the common descent of all from one ancestral form. The unicellular
+egg[20] repeats the stage of our Protozoan ancestors; the Blastula
+is equivalent to an ancestral coenobium of Magosphaera or Volvox;
+the Gastrula is the hereditary repetition of the Gastraea, the common
+ancestor of all the Metazoa.
+
+ [20] See note, p. 115--Theory of cells.
+
+Man agrees in all these respects with the other vertebrates, and must
+have descended with them from the same common root.
+
+Particularly obscure is that part of our phylogeny which extends from
+the Gastraea to Amphioxus. The morphological importance of this last
+small creature had been perceived by Johannes Mueller, who in 1842
+gave the first accurate description of it. It would not, of course, be
+correct to proclaim the modern Amphioxus the common ancestor of all the
+vertebrates; but he must be regarded as closely related to them, and
+as the only survivor of the whole class of Acrania. If the Amphioxidae
+had through some unfortunate accident become extinct, we should not
+have been able to gain anything like a positive glimpse at our most
+remote vertebrate ancestor. On the one hand, Amphioxus is closely
+connected with the early larva of the Cyclostomes, which are the
+oldest Craniota, and the pre-Silurian ancestors of the fishes. On the
+other hand, the ontogeny of Amphioxus is in harmony with that of the
+Ascidians, and if this agreement is not merely coincidental, but due to
+relationship, we are justified in reconstructing for both Ascidians
+and Amphioxus one common ancestral group of chordate animals, the
+hypothetical _Prochordonia_. The modern Copelata give us a remote idea
+of their structure. The curious Balanoglossus, the only living form of
+Enteropneusta, seems to connect these Prochordonia with the Nemertina
+and other Vermalia, which we unite in one large class--Frontonia.
+
+No doubt these pre-Cambrian Vermalia, and the common root of all
+Metazoa, the Gastraeades, were connected during the Laurentian period
+by a long chain of intermediate forms, and probably among these
+were some older forms of Rotatoria and Turbellaria; but at present
+it is not possible to fill this wide gap with hypotheses that are
+satisfactory, and we have to admit that here indeed are many missing
+links in the older history of the Invertebrata. Still, every zoologist
+who is convinced of the truth of transformism, and is accustomed to
+phylogenetic speculations, knows very well that their results are most
+unequal, often incomplete.
+
+
+
+
+III.
+
+
+Let us now recapitulate the ancestral chain of man, as it is set forth
+in the accompanying diagram (p. 55), which represents our present
+knowledge of our descent. For simplicity's sake the many side-issues
+or branches which lead to groups not in the main line of our descent
+have been left out, or have been indicated merely. Many of the stages
+are of course hypothetical, arrived at by the study of comparative
+anatomy and ontogeny; but an example for each of them has been taken
+from those living or fossil creatures which seem to be their nearest
+representatives.
+
+1. The most remote ancestors of all living organisms were living beings
+of the simplest imaginable kind, organisms without organs, like
+the still existing _Monera_. Each consisted of a simple granule of
+protoplasm, a structureless mass of albuminous matter or plasson, like
+the recent Chromaceae and Bacteriae. The morphological value of these
+beings is not yet that of a cell, but that of a cytode, or cell without
+a nucleus. Cytoplasm and nucleus were still undifferentiated.
+
+I assume that the first Monera owe their existence to spontaneous
+creation out of so-called anorganic combinations, consisting of carbon,
+hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. An explanation of this hypothesis I
+have given in my 'Generelle Morphologie.'
+
+The Monera probably arose early in the Laurentian period. The oldest
+are the Phytomonera, with vegetable metabolism. They possessed the
+power (characteristic of plants) of forming albumin by synthesis from
+carbon, water, and ammonia. From some of these plasma-forming Monera
+arose the plasmophagous Zoomonera with animal metabolism, living
+directly upon the produce of their plasmodomous or plasma-forming
+sisters. This is the first instance of the great principle of division
+of labour.
+
+2. The second stage is that of the _simple and single cell_, a bit
+of protoplasm with a nucleus. Such unicellular organisms are still
+very common. The _Amoebae_ are their simplest representatives. The
+morphological value of such beings is the same as that of the egg
+of any animal. The naked egg cells of the sponges creep about in an
+amoeboid fashion, scarcely distinguishable from Amoeba. The same
+remark applies to the egg-cell of man himself in its early stages
+before it is enclosed in a membrane. The first unicellular organisms
+arose from Monera through differentiation of the inner nucleus from the
+outer protoplasm.
+
+3. Repeated division of the unicellular organism produces the
+_Synamoebium_, or community of Amoebae, provided the divisional
+products, or new generations of the original cell, do not scatter,
+but remain together. The existence of such a _Coenobium_, a number
+of equal and only loosely-connected cells, as a separate stage in the
+ancestral history of animals, is made highly probable by the fact that
+the eggs of all animals undergo after fertilization such a process of
+repeated self-division, or 'cleavage,' until the single egg cell is
+transformed into a heap of cells closely packed together, not unlike a
+mulberry (_morula_)--hence _morula_ stage in ontogeny.
+
+4. The morula of most animals further changes into a _Blastula_, a
+hollow ball filled with fluid, the wall being formed by a single layer
+of cells, the blastoderm or germinal layer. This modification is
+brought about by the action of the cells--they conveying nourishing
+fluid into the interior of the whole cell colony and thereby
+being themselves forced towards the surface. The Blastula of most
+Invertebrata, and even that of Amphioxus, is possessed of fine ciliae,
+or hair-like processes, the vibrating motion of which causes the whole
+organism to rotate and advance in the water. Living representatives of
+such Blastaeads, namely, globular gelatinous colonies of cells enclosing
+a cavity, are Volvox and Magosphaera.
+
+5. The Blastula of most animals assumes a new larval form called
+_Gastrula_, in which the essential characteristics are that a portion
+of the blastoderm by invagination converts the Blastula into a cup
+with double walls, enclosing a new cavity, the primitive gut. This
+invagination or bulging-in obliterates the original inner cavity of
+the Blastula. The outer layer of the Gastrula is the ectoderm, the
+inner the endoderm; both pass into each other at the blastoporus, or
+opening of the gut cavity. The Gastrula is a stage in the embryonic
+development of the various great groups of animals, and some such
+primitive form as ancestral to all Metazoa is thus indicated. This
+hypothetical _Gastraea_ is still very essentially represented by the
+lower Coelenterates--_e.g._, Olynthus, Hydra.
+
+6. The sixth stage--that of the _Platodes_, or flat-worms--is very
+hypothetical. They are bilateral gastraeads, with a flattened oblong
+body, furnished with ciliae, with a primitive nervous system, simple
+sensory and reproductive organs, but still without appendages, body
+cavity, vent, and blood-vessels. The nearest living representatives of
+such creatures are the acoelous Turbellarians--_e.g._, Convoluta, a
+free-swimming, ciliated creature.
+
+7. The next higher stage is represented by such low animals as the
+_Gastrotricha_--_e.g._, Chaetonotus among the Rotatoria, which differ
+from the rhabdocoelous Turbellarians chiefly by the formation of
+a vent and the beginnings of a coelom, or cavity, between gut and
+body wall. The addition of a primitive vascular system and a pair of
+nephridia, or excretory organs, is first met with in the _Nemertines_.
+
+8. These, together with the _Enteropneusta_ (Balanoglossus), are
+comprised under the name of Frontonia, or Rhynchelminthes, and form the
+highest group of the Vermalia.
+
+The Enteropneusta especially fix our attention, because they alone,
+although essentially 'worms,' exhibit certain characteristics which
+make it possible to bridge over the gulf which still separates the
+Invertebrata from the vertebrate phylum. The anterior portion of the
+gut is transformed into a breathing apparatus--hence Gegenbaur's
+term of Enteropneusta, or Gut-breathers. Moreover, Balanoglossus and
+Cephalodiscus possess another modification of the gut--namely, a
+peculiar diverticulum, which, in the present state of our knowledge,
+may be looked upon as the forerunner of the chorda dorsalis.
+
+9. Stage of _Prochordonia_, as indicated by the larval form, called
+Chordula, which is common to the Tunicata and all the Vertebrata.
+These two groups possess three most important features: (_a_) A chorda
+dorsalis, a stiff rod lying in the long axis of the body, dorsally from
+the gut and below the central nervous system. This latter, for the
+first time in the animal kingdom, appears in the shape of a spinal
+cord. (_b_) The use of the anterior portion of the gut for respiratory
+purposes. (_c_) The larval development of the Tunicata is essentially
+the same as that of the Vertebrata in its early stages. Only the
+free-swimming Copelata or Appendicularia among the Tunicates retain
+most of these features. The others, which become sessile--namely, the
+Ascidiae, or sea-squirts--degenerate and specialize away from the main
+line.
+
+10. Stage of the _Acrania_, represented by Amphioxus. The early
+development of this little marine creature agrees closely with
+that of the Tunicates; but one important feature is added to its
+organization--namely, metamerism, segmentally arranged mesoderm.
+Amphioxus still possesses neither skull nor vertebrae, neither ribs
+nor jaws, and no limbs. But it is a member of the Vertebrata if we
+define these as follows: Bilateral symmetrical animals with segmentally
+arranged mesoderm, with a chorda dorsalis between the tubular nervous
+system and the gut, and with respiratory organs which arise from the
+anterior portion of the gut. We do not assume that Amphioxus stands
+in the direct ancestral line; it is probably much specialized, partly
+degenerated, and represents a side-branch; but it is, nevertheless,
+the only creature, hitherto known, which satisfactorily connects the
+Vertebrata with their invertebrate ancestors. Many other efforts have
+been made to solve the mystery of the origin of the Vertebrata--all
+less satisfactory than the present suggestion, or even absolutely
+futile. This remark applies especially to the attempts to derive them
+from either Articulata or Echinoderms. The other great and highly
+developed phylum, the Mollusca, is quite out of the question. We have
+to go back to a level at which all these principal phyla meet, and
+there we find the Vermalia, the lower of which alone permit connection
+in an upward direction with the higher phyla.
+
+ ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE VERTEBRATA.
+
+ _Abridged from 'Systemat. Phylogenie,' Sec. 15._
+
+ Names underlined refer to hypothetical groups.
+
+ _Mammalia_
+ _Aves_ |
+ | _Reptilia_ |
+ | | |
+ +----------------+ |
+ | |
+ +--------------+
+ |
+ _Proreptilia_
+ | _Amphibia_
+ _Pisces_ | |
+ | | +----------+
+ | | |
+ | | | _Dipnoi_
+ | _Stegocephali_ |
+ | | |
+ | +---------------+
+ | |
+ +---------------+
+ | _Cyclostomata_
+ _Proselachii_ |
+ | |
+ _Tunicata_ | +--------+
+ | | |
+ | *_Archicrania_*
+ | | _Acrania_
+ | | |
+ | *_Prospondylia_*------+
+ | |
+ +----------+ |
+ | |
+ *_Prochordonia_*
+
+
+11. Stage of _Cyclostomata_. This now small group of Lampreys and
+Hagfishes represents the lowest Craniota; and although much specialized
+as a side-branch of the main-stem from which the other Craniota have
+sprung, they give us an idea of what the direct ancestors of the latter
+must have been like:--still without visceral arches, without jaws and
+without paired limbs; with a persistent pronephros; the ear with one
+semicircular canal only; mouth suctorial; cranium very primitive;
+and the metamerism of the vertebral column indicated only by little
+blocks of cartilage in the perichordal sheath. Such creatures must
+have existed at least as early as the Lower Silurian epoch; but until
+1890 fossil Cyclostomes were unknown. Their life in the mud, or as
+endoparasites of fishes, coupled with their soft structure, makes them
+very unfit for preservation. This gives all the greater importance to
+Traquair's discovery, in 1890, of many little creatures, called by him
+_Palaeospondylus gunni_, in the Old Red Sandstone of Caithness, which
+seem to be very closely allied to Cyclostomata.
+
+12. The _Elasmobranchi_ (sharks and skates), with their immediate
+forerunners, the Acanthodi of the Devonian and Carboniferous age,
+are the first typical fishes. That they existed as far back as the
+Silurian age is proved by many enamelled spines of the dermal armour,
+chiefly from the dorsal fins. This higher stage is characterized by the
+possession of typical jaws, by visceral or gill-bearing arches, and by
+two pairs of limbs. None of the Elasmobranchs, fossil or recent, stands
+in the direct ancestral line; but they are the lowest Gnathostomata,
+jaw-and-limb-possessing creatures, known.
+
+13. Closely connected with the Elasmobranchs in a wider sense are the
+_Crossopterygii_, which begin in the Devonian age as a large group, but
+have left only two survivals, the African Polypterus and Calamoichthys.
+They are possessed of dermal bones and other ossifications, and are
+characterized by their lobate paired fins, which have a thick axis
+beset with biserial fin rays. Their gill-clefts are covered by an
+operculum, and they have a well-developed air-bladder. Whilst they
+are in many respects more highly developed than the Elasmobranchs,
+and are intimately connected with the typical Ganoids and other
+bony fishes (all of which form a great, manifold side-branch of the
+general vertebrate stem), they stand in many other respects (notably,
+the structure of the paired fins, the vertebral column, and the
+air-bladder) nearer the main-stem of our own ancestral line.
+
+14. This is shown by their intimate relation to the _Dipnoi_, which
+are still represented by the Australian, African, and South American
+mud-fishes: Ceratodus, Protopterus, and Lepidosiren. The genus
+Ceratodus existed in the Upper Trias, whence various other unmistakably
+dipnoous forms lead down through the Carboniferous (_e.g._, Ctenodus)
+to the Devonian strata--_e.g._, Dipterus. They are characterized as
+follows: The paired fins still retain the archipterygial form (namely,
+one axis with biserial rays); the heart is already trilocular, and
+receives blood which is mixed arterial and venous, owing to the gills
+being retained, while the air-bladder has been modified into a lung. In
+fact, the generalized Dipnoi form the actual link between fishes and
+_Amphibia_.
+
+15. _Amphibia._ The earliest amphibian fossils occur in
+the Carboniferous strata. They alone--the Stegocephali or
+Phractamphibia--stand in the ancestral line, while the Lissamphibia, to
+which all the recent forms belong, are side-branches. The Stegocephali
+are the earliest Tetrapoda, the archipterygial paired fins having been
+transformed into the pentadactyle fore and hind limbs, which are so
+characteristic of all the higher Vertebrata. The cranium is roofed
+over by dermal bones, of which, besides others, supra-occipitals,
+supra-orbitals, and supra-temporals are always present. The lowest
+members (Branchiosauri) still retained gills besides the lungs, while
+others (Microsauri) have lost the gills. Be it remembered that all
+the recent Amphibia still undergo the same metamorphosis during their
+ontogenetic development.
+
+In the very important Temnospondyli, a subgroup of the
+Stegocephali--_e.g._, Trimerorhachis of the Lower Red Sandstone or
+Lower Permian--the component cartilaginous or bony units which compose
+the vertebrae still remained in a separate, unfused state, showing at
+the same time an arrangement whence has arisen that which is typical
+of the Amniota. The same applies to the limbs and their girdles. In
+fact, the Stegocephali, taken as a whole, lead imperceptibly to the
+_Proreptilia_.
+
+16. _Proreptilia_ are represented by the Permian genera Eryops and
+Cricotus. Until quite recently these and many other fossils from
+the Carboniferous strata were looked upon as Amphibia, while many
+undoubted fossil Amphibia were mistaken for reptiles, as indicated by
+the frequent termination '-saurus' in their names.
+
+The nearest living representative of these extinct Proreptilia is
+the New Zealand reptile Hatteria, or Sphenodon, close relations
+of which are known from the Upper Trias; while others--_e.g._,
+Palaeohatteria--have been discovered in the Permian. Anyhow, Sphenodon
+is the reptile which stands nearest to the main stem of our ancestry.
+
+The most important characteristics of the Reptilia, which mark a higher
+stage or level, are (1) The entire suppression of the gills--although
+during the embryonic development the gill-clefts still appear in all
+reptiles, birds, and mammals; (2) The development of an amnion and an
+allantois, both for the embryonic life only, but so characteristic
+that all these animals are comprised under the name of Amniota;
+(3) The articulation of the skull with the first neck vertebrae by
+well-developed condyles, either single (really triple) or double (such
+a condylar arrangement begins with the Amphibia, but only the two
+lateral condyles are developed, while the middle portion, belonging to
+the basi-occipital element, remains rudimentary[21]); (4) The formation
+of centra, or bodies of the vertebrae, mainly by a ventral pair of the
+original quadruple constituents, or arcualia.
+
+ [21] Similar conditions seem to have prevailed among the Proreptilia;
+ but in those of their descendants which have specialized into Reptiles
+ and Birds the basi-occipital element becomes more and more predominant
+ in that formation which ultimately leads to the apparently single
+ condyle. Hence it is misleading to divide the Tetrapoda into the two
+ main groups of Amphi-and Mono-condylia, and therefrom to conclude that
+ the two-condyled Mammalia are more closely related to the likewise
+ amphicondylous Amphibia than to the so-called monocondylous Reptiles.
+
+17. Between the Proreptilia and the Mammalia, which latter occur in
+the Upper Triassic epoch, we have necessarily to intercalate a group
+of very low reptiles, which are still so generalized that their
+descendants could branch off either into the Reptilia proper or into
+the Mammalia. The changes concerned chiefly the brain and the heart;
+of the skeleton, the skull and the pelvis; and, of the tegumentary
+structures, the formation of a hairy covering. Many such creatures
+existed in the Triassic epoch--namely, the _Theromorpha_--some of which
+indeed possess so many characteristics which otherwise occur in the
+Mammalia only, that these creatures have been termed _Sauro-Mammalia_.
+However, it has to be emphasized that none of the Theromorpha hitherto
+discovered fulfils all the requirements which would entitle them to
+this important linking position. They only give us an approximate idea
+of what this link was like.
+
+18. Stage of the _Promammalia_, or _Prototheria_. The only surviving
+members are the famous duck-bill, Ornithorhynchus, and the spiny
+ant-eaters, Echidna and Proechidna, of the Australian region. These
+few genera, however, differ so much from one another in various
+important respects that they cannot but be remnants of an originally
+much larger group. Indeed, many fossils from the Upper Triassic and
+from the Jurassic strata have without much doubt to be referred to the
+Prototheria. The Prototheria are typical mammals, because they possess
+the following characteristics: The heart is completely quadrilocular;
+the blood is warm, and its red corpuscles have, owing to the loss
+of their nucleus, been modified from biconvex into biconcave discs;
+they have a hairy coat and sweat glands, and two occipital condyles;
+the ilio-sacral connection is preacetabular; the ankle-joint is
+cruro-tarsal; the quadrate bone of the Reptilia has ceased to carry the
+under jaw, which now articulates directly with the squamosal portion
+of the skull. Their low position is shown by the retention of the
+following reptilian features: Complete coracoid bones and a T-shaped
+interclavicle; a cloaca, or common chamber for the passage of the
+faeces, the genital and the urinary products; they are still oviparous;
+the embryo develops without a chorion, and is therefore not nourished
+through a placenta. Even the milk glands, which are absolutely
+peculiar to the Mammalia, are still in a very primitive stage, and do
+not yet produce milk proper; and there is only a temporary shallow
+marsupium.
+
+19. Stage of _Metatheria_, or _Marsupialia_, are direct descendants of
+Prototheria; but they show higher development by the reduction of the
+coracoid bones and the interclavicle. The original cloaca is divided
+into a rectal chamber and a uro-genital sinus, completely separated,
+at least in the males; they are viviparous; the young are received
+into a permanent marsupium, in the walls of which are formed typical
+milk glands and nipples, but the embryo is still devoid of a placenta,
+although some recent marsupials show indications of such an organ. The
+corpus callosum in the brain is still very weak.
+
+Most of the marsupials are extinct. They occur from the Upper Trias
+onwards, and had in the Jurassic epoch attained a wide distribution
+both in Europe and in America. Since the Tertiary epoch they have
+been restricted to America and to the Australian region, and are now
+represented by about 150 species.
+
+20. Stage of _Prochoriata_, or early _Placentalia_: a further
+development of the Metatheria by the development of a placenta, loss
+of the marsupium and the marsupial bones, complete division by the
+perineum of the anal and uro-genital chambers, stronger development of
+the corpus callosum, or chief commissure of the two hemispheres of the
+brain.
+
+Placentalia must have come into existence during the Cretaceous
+epoch. Up to that time all the Mammalia seem to have belonged to
+either Prototheria or to Metatheria; but in the early Eocene we can
+distinguish the main groups of Placentalia--namely, (1) Trogontia, now
+represented by the rodents; (2) Edentata, or sloths, armadilloes, etc.;
+(3) Carnassia, or Insectivora and Carnivora; (4) Chiroptera, or bats;
+(5) Cetomorpha, or whales and dugongs; (6) Ungulata; (7) Primates.
+Of these groups, the first and second, third and fourth, fifth and
+sixth, can perhaps, to judge from palaeontological evidence, be combined
+into three greater groups, as indicated by the fossil Esthonychida,
+Ictopsida, and Condylarthra, in addition to the ancestral Primates,
+or Lemuravida, as the fourth large branch of the ancestral-tree where
+this has reached the placental level. Among none of the first three
+branches can we look for the ancestors of the Primates. The Lemuravida,
+therefore, represent a branch equivalent to the three other branches.
+
+21. Stage of _Lemures_, or _Prosimiae_, comprising the older members of
+the Primates, consequently approaching most nearly to the Lemuravida.
+The limbs are modified into pentadactyle hands and feet of the arboreal
+type, and are protected by nails. The dentition is of the frugivorous
+or omnivorous type, with an originally complete series of teeth, with
+milk teeth and with permanent. The orbit is surrounded by a complete
+bony ring, posteriorly by a fronto-jugal arch, but still widely
+communicating with the temporal fossa. The placenta is diffuse and
+non-deciduous.
+
+ ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE MAMMALIA.
+
+ _'Systematische Phylogenie,' Sec. 386._
+
+ _Perissodactyla_ _Homo_ _Carnivora_
+ | (_Litopterna_) | | _Pinnipedia_
+ | | | | |
+ +-------+ _Anthropoidae_ +------+
+ _Artiodactyla_ | | |
+ | | | _Carnassia_
+ +----------+ _Catarhinae_ |
+ | | _Chiroptera_ |
+ _Proboscidea_ | | | _Insectivora_ |
+ | | _Platyrhinae_ | | |
+ (_Amblypoda_) | | | | +-------+
+ | | | | | | _Rodentia_
+ +-------+ | _Simiae_ +-------+ |
+ | | | | (_Tillodontia_)
+ +--+ | | |
+ _Cetacea_ | | | _Trogontia_
+ | _Sirenia_ | _Lemures_ _*Ictopsales*_ | _Edentata_
+ | | | | | | |
+ _Cetomorpha_ | _Hyracoidea_ | | _*Esthonychales*_
+ | | | | | |
+ +---_?_---+------+ | | |
+ | _*Lemuravidae*_ | |
+ _*Condylarthrales*_ | +-------+ |
+ | | | |
+ +--------Eutheria s. Placentalia------------------+
+ |
+ | _Marsupialia polyprotodontia_
+ _Marsupialia diprotodontia_ | |
+ | | |
+ +-------------Metatheria--------------+
+ |
+ | _Monotremata_
+ | | (_Allotheria_)
+ | | |
+ | +-----------------+
+ | |
+ Prototheria-----+
+ |
+ |
+ _*Hypotheria s.*_ _*Promammalia*_
+
+ _Names in brackets indicate extinct groups.
+ Names *underlined* indicate hypothetical groups or combinations._
+
+22. Stage of _Simiae_. Orbit completely separated from the temporal
+fossa by an inward extension of the frontal and malar bones meeting the
+alisphenoid. Placenta consolidated into a disc, and with a maternal
+deciduous portion. Mammae pectoral only. The dental formula is 2.1.3.3.
+All the fingers and toes are protected by flat nails. The tail is long.
+The American prehensile-tailed monkeys are a lower side-branch.
+
+23. Stage of _Catarrhinae Cercopithecidae_. The dental formula is
+2.1.2.3, owing to the loss of one pair of premolars in each jaw.
+The frontal and alisphenoid bones are in contact, separating the
+parietal from the malar bone; this feature is correlated with the
+enlarged brain. The internarial septum is narrow, and the nostrils
+look forwards and downwards instead of sidewards--hence the term
+'Catarrhinae.' The external auditory meatus is long and bony. The tail
+is long, with the exception of _Macacus inuus_. The body is covered
+with a thick coat of furry hair. Catarrhine monkeys have existed, we
+know with certainty, since the Miocene.
+
+24. Stage of _Catarrhinae Anthropoidae_, or _Apes_. Now represented by
+the large apes--namely, the Hylobates or gibbon of South-Eastern Asia,
+_Simia satyrus_, the orang-utan of Sumatra and Borneo, _Troglodytes
+gorilla_, _T. niger_ and _T. calvus_, the gorilla and the chimpanzees
+from Western Equatorial Africa. Of fossils are to be mentioned
+Pliopithecus and Dryopithecus from European Miocene, and _Troglodytes
+sivalensis_ from the Pliocene of the Punjaub. The tail is reduced
+to a few caudal vertebrae, which are transformed into a coccyx, not
+visible externally; but in the embryos of apes and man the tail is
+still a conspicuous feature. The walk is semierect; in adaptation
+to the prevailing arboreal life, the arms are longer than the legs.
+The hair of the body is considerably more scanty than in the tailed
+monkeys. _Troglodytes calvus_, a species or variety of chimpanzee, is
+bald-headed. None of the recent genera of apes can lay claim to a place
+in the ancestry of mankind.
+
+25. Stage of _Pithecanthropi_. Hitherto the only known representative
+is _Pithecanthropus erectus_, from the Upper Pliocene of Java. In
+adaptation to a more erect gait, the legs have become stronger and the
+hind-hand has been turned into a flat-soled walking 'foot.' The brain
+is considerably enlarged. Presumably it is still devoid of so-called
+articulate speech; this is indicated by the fact that children have
+to learn the language of their parents, and by the circumstance that
+comparative philology declares it impossible to reduce the chief human
+languages to anything like one common origin.
+
+26. _Man._ Known with certainty to have existed as an implement-using
+creature in the last Glacial epoch. His probable origin cannot,
+therefore, have been later than the beginning of the Plistocene. The
+place of origin was probably somewhere in Southern Asia.
+
+Whilst we have to admit that there are great defects in the older
+(invertebrate) portion of our pedigree, we have all the more reason to
+be satisfied with the positive results of our investigation of the more
+recent (vertebrate) part of it. All modern researches have confirmed
+the views of Lamarck, Darwin, and Huxley, and they allow of no doubt
+that the nearest vertebrate ancestors of mankind were a series of
+Tertiary Primates.
+
+Particularly valuable are the admirable attempts of the two zoologists,
+Paul and Fritz Sarasin,[22] to throw light upon the human phylogeny by
+painstaking comparison of all the skeletal parts of man with those of
+the anthropoid apes. They have shown that among the lower races of man
+the primitive Veddahs of Ceylon approach the apes most nearly, and that
+among the latter the chimpanzee stands nearest to man.
+
+ [22] 'Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf Ceylon,' vols.
+ 4 and 5. (With an atlas of 84 plates; 1893.)
+
+The direct descent of man from some extinct ape-like form is now beyond
+doubt, and admits of being traced much more clearly than the origin
+of many another mammalian order. The pedigrees of the Elephants, the
+Sirenia, the Cetacea, and, above all, of the Edentata, for example,
+are much more obscure and difficult to explain. In many parts of their
+organization--for example, in the number and structure of his five
+digits and toes--man and monkeys have remained much more primitive than
+most of the Ungulata.
+
+The immense significance of this positive knowledge of the origin of
+man from some Primate does not require to be enforced. Its bearing
+upon the highest questions of philosophy cannot be exaggerated. Among
+modern philosophers no one has perceived this more deeply than Herbert
+Spencer.[23] He is one of those older thinkers who before Darwin were
+convinced that the theory of development is the only way to solve
+the 'enigma of the world.' Spencer is also the champion of those
+evolutionists who lay the greatest weight upon _progressive heredity_,
+or the much combated _heredity of acquired characters_. From the first
+he has severely attacked and criticised the theories of Weismann, who
+denies this most important factor of phylogeny, and would explain
+the whole of transformism by the 'all-sufficiency of selection.' In
+England the theories of Weismann were received with enthusiastic
+acclamation, much more so than on the Continent, and they were called
+'Neo-Darwinism,' in opposition to the older conception of Evolution,
+or 'Neo-Lamarckism.' Neither of those expressions is correct. Darwin
+himself was convinced of the fundamental importance of progressive
+heredity quite as much as his great predecessor Lamarck; as were also
+Huxley and Spencer.
+
+ [23] 'Principles of Biology': 'The Factors of Organic Evolution'; 'The
+ Inadequacy of Natural Selection.'
+
+Three times I had the good fortune to visit Darwin at Down, and on each
+occasion we discussed this fundamental question in complete harmony.
+I agree with Spencer in the conviction that progressive heredity is
+an indispensable factor in every true monistic theory of Evolution,
+and that it is one of its most important elements. If one denies with
+Weismann the heredity of acquired characters, then it becomes necessary
+to have recourse to purely mystical qualities of germ-plasm. I am of
+the opinion of Spencer, that in that case it would be better to accept
+a mysterious creation of all the various species as described in the
+Mosaic account.
+
+If we look at the results of modern anthropogeny from the highest point
+of view, and compare all its empirical arguments, we are justified in
+affirming that _the descent of man from an extinct Tertiary series of
+Primates is not a vague hypothesis, but an historical fact_.
+
+Of course, this fact cannot be proved _exactly_. We cannot explain all
+the innumerable physical and chemical processes, all the physiological
+mutations, which have led during untold millions of years from the
+simplest Monera and from the unicellular Protista upwards to the
+chimpanzee and to man. But the same consideration applies to all
+historical facts. We all believe that Aristotle, Caesar, and King Alfred
+did live; but it is impossible to give a proof within the meaning of
+modern exact science. We believe firmly in the former existence of
+these and other great heroes of thought, because we know well the works
+they have left behind them, and we see their effects in the history
+of human culture. These indirect arguments do not furnish stronger
+evidence than those of our history as vertebrates. We know of many
+Jurassic mammals only a single bone, the under jaw. We all believe that
+these mammals possessed also an upper jaw, a skull, and other bones.
+But the so-called 'exact school,' which regards the transformation of
+species as a hypothesis not proven, must suppose that the mandibula was
+the only bone in the body of these curious animals.
+
+Looking forward to the twentieth century, I am convinced that it will
+universally accept our theory of descent, and that future science
+will regard it as the greatest advance made in our time. I have no
+doubt that the influence of the study of anthropogeny upon all other
+branches of science will be fruitful and auspicious. The work done in
+the present century by Lamarck and Darwin will in all future times be
+considered one of the greatest conquests made by thinking man.
+
+ EVOLUTIONARY STAGES OF THE PRINCIPAL GROUPS OF VERTEBRATA.[24]
+
+ STAGES OF THE CLASSES. STAGES OF THE HEART.
+ PAIRED LIMBS.
+
+ { 1. _Acrania._ I. _Leptocardia._
+ I. _Adactylia_ { Cold-blooded; heart
+ s. _Impinnata_. { with one chamber;
+ Without jaws { without lungs.
+ and limbs. {
+ { 2. _Cyclostomata._ } II. _Ichthyocardia._
+ } Cold-blooded; heart
+ } two-chambered, with
+ } one atrium and one
+ } ventricle; heart
+ } containing venous
+ } blood only; without
+ II. _Polydactylia_ { 3. _Pisces._ } lungs.
+ s. _Pinnata_. {
+ With two { } III. _Amphicardia._
+ pairs of fins. { 4. _Dipnoi._ } Cold-blooded; heart
+ } with three complete
+ } chambers, namely, with
+ } two atria and one
+ } ventricle, or (Reptilia)
+ { 5. _Amphibia._ } two ventricles with still
+ { } incomplete septum; heart
+ { } containing mixed venous
+ { } and arterialized
+ III. _Pentadactylia_ { 6. _Reptilia._ } blood; with lungs.
+ s. _Tetrapoda_. {
+ With two pairs { { IV. _Thermocardia._
+ of pentadactyle { { Warm-blooded; heart
+ limbs (unless { 7. _Aves._ { with four complete
+ they have { { chambers, namely, two
+ been lost by { { auricles and two
+ reduction). { { ventricles; right half
+ { { of the heart with venous,
+ { { left half with
+ { { arterialized, blood; with
+ { 8. _Mammalia._ { lungs.
+
+
+ [24] Abridged from Haeckel's 'Systematische Phylogenie der
+ Vertebraten,' Sec. 14.
+
+
+
+
+ BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES
+
+
+JEAN BAPTISTE DE MONET, CHEVALIER DE LAMARCK, was born on
+August 1, 1744, in Picardy, where his father owned land. Originally
+educated for the Church, he soon enlisted, and distinguished himself
+in active service. Owing to an accident affecting his health, the
+young Lieutenant gave up the military career, and, without means,
+studied medicine and natural sciences at Paris. In 1778 appeared his
+'Flore francaise.' In 1793 he was appointed to a Chair of Zoology at
+the newly-formed Musee d'Histoire Naturelle. He had the misfortune to
+become gradually blind, and the last years of his life were spent amid
+straitened circumstances. He died in 1829.
+
+In 1794 Lamarck divided the whole animal kingdom into vertebrate and
+invertebrate animals, and founded successively the groups of Crustacea,
+Arachnida, Annelida, and Radiata. Between 1816 and 1822 he published
+his celebrated 'Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertebres.'
+
+His most famous work is the 'Philosophie zoologique,' 1809.
+
+Assuming the spontaneous origin of life, he propounded the doctrine
+that all animals and plants have arisen from low forms through
+incessant modifications and changes. In this respect he was in absolute
+opposition to Cuvier, who upheld the immutability of species, and did
+his best by absolute silence to suppress the spread of the new doctrine.
+
+Lamarck has explained his views of transformism chiefly in the seventh
+chapter of the first volume of his 'Philosophie zoologique.'
+
+Organisms strive to accommodate or adapt themselves to new
+circumstances, or to satisfy new requirements--_e.g._, climate, mode
+of procuring food, escape from enemies. The continued function of
+parts of an organism changes the old and produces new organs. The
+acquirements are inherited by the offspring, and thus are produced the
+more complicated from simpler organisms. Continued disuse brings about
+degeneration and ultimate loss of an organ.
+
+Lamarck consequently sees in the adaptability, or power of adaptation,
+which he assumes for all living matter the ultimate cause of variation;
+and, as he was certainly the first to point out that acquired
+characters are inherited by the progeny, he has given a working
+explanation of Evolution.
+
+But his doctrine did not spread--partly because he was misunderstood.
+His theory, that a new want, by making itself felt, exacts from the
+animal new exertions, perhaps from parts hitherto not used, until the
+want is satisfied--this way of putting it sounds too teleological
+to explain the yearned-for change in a mechanical or natural way.
+Moreover, many of his examples lacked the exact basis of experiment
+and observation necessary for their acceptance. Witness that of the
+neck of the giraffe,--a never-failing source of ridicule to men who
+cannot see the deeper purpose underlying the well-meant attempt at
+an explanation, which failed from want of complete knowledge of the
+intricate circumstances.
+
+However, the theory of transformism was, so to speak, in the air;
+and various authors have written on the subject, filling the gap
+between Lamarck and Darwin, especially Goethe, Treviranus, Leopold
+von Buch, and Herbert Spencer. But it is Darwin's immortal merit to
+have opened our eyes by his theory of natural selection, which is, at
+least, the first attempt to explain some of the causes and incidents
+of organic Evolution in a natural mechanical way. Moreover, he was
+the first clearly to express the fundamental principles of the theory
+of descent, to elaborate what had been at best a general sketch of an
+ill-defined problem, and to enter into detail, supported by a host
+of painstaking observations, the making of which had taken him half a
+lifetime. Darwin, without going further than cursorily into the causes
+of variation, argued as follows: We know that variations do occur
+in every kind of living creatures. Some of these variations lead to
+something, while others do not. An enormously greater number of animals
+and plants are born than reach maturity and can in their turn continue
+the race. What is the regulating factor? His answer is, The struggle
+for existence--in other words, the weeding out of the less fit, or
+rather of the owners of those variations which are not so well adapted
+to their surroundings.
+
+For 'adapted' we had better read 'adaptable,' because a variation which
+does not answer, which cannot be made use of, or, still more notably,
+is a hindrance or disadvantage, does not become an adapted feature.
+There is often a confusion between adaptation as an accomplished
+fact, a feature, or resultant condition, and adaptation as the mode
+of fitting the organism to, or making the best of, the prevailing
+surroundings or circumstances.
+
+ETIENNE GEOFFROY SAINT-HILAIRE was born in 1772 at Etampes,
+Seine-et-Oise. He was originally brought up for the Church; but when
+already ordained he attended lectures on natural science and medicine
+in Paris. He managed to get the place of assistant in the Musee
+d'Histoire Naturelle; he became Professor of Zoology in 1793, and took
+the opportunity of encouraging young Cuvier. Later he became Professor
+of Zoology of the Faculte des Sciences, and in 1818 he published his
+remarkable 'Philosophie anatomique.' He died in 1844.
+
+He had conceived the 'unity of organic composition,' meaning that there
+is only one plan of construction,--the same principle, but varied in
+its accessory parts. In 1830, when Geoffroy proceeded to apply to the
+Invertebrata his views as to the uniformity of animal composition,
+he found a vigorous opponent in Cuvier. Geoffroy, like Goethe, held
+that there is in Nature a law of compensation, or balancing of growth,
+so that if one organ take on an excess of development, it is at the
+expense of another part; and he maintained that, since Nature takes no
+sudden leaps, even organs which are superfluous in any given species,
+if they have played an important part in other species of the same
+family, are retained as rudiments, which testify to the permanence
+of the general plan of creation. It was his conviction that, owing
+to the conditions of life, the same forms had _not_ been perpetuated
+since the origin of all things, although it was not his belief that
+existing species were becoming modified. Cuvier, on the other hand,
+maintained the absolute invariability of species, which, he declared,
+had been created with regard to the circumstances in which they were
+placed, each organ contrived with a view to the function it had
+to fulfil,--thus putting the effect for the cause ('Encyclopaedia
+Britannica,' 9th edition, vol. xxi., p. 171).
+
+GEORGE CUVIER was born in 1769 at Montbeliard, in the department of
+Doubs, which at that time belonged to Wuerttemberg. He was educated at
+Stuttgart, and studied political economy. While acting as private tutor
+to a French family in France he followed his favourite pursuit, the
+study of natural sciences. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire heard of him, and
+appointed him assistant in the department of comparative anatomy in the
+Musee d'Histoire Naturelle. In 1799 he was elected Professor of Natural
+History at the College de France, and soon after he became Perpetual
+Secretary of the Institut National. In 1831, a year before his death,
+Louis Philippe raised him to the rank of a peer of France.
+
+Cuvier was the first to indicate the true principle upon which the
+natural classification of animals should be based--namely, their
+structure. It is the study of the anatomy of the creatures and their
+comparison which affords the only sound basis of a classification.
+The work which had the greatest influence upon the scientific public
+is his 'Regne animal distribue d'apres son Organisation,' 1817. The
+system which he propounded in this book gradually came to have almost
+world-wide fame, and, in spite of its many obvious deficiencies, still
+lingers in some of our most recent text-books.
+
+A standard work is his 'Lecons d'Anatomie comparee,' and, in truth, he
+is the founder of that kind of comparative anatomy which was brought
+to such a high state by his pupil, the late Sir Richard Owen. Cuvier
+discovered the law of 'correlation of growth,' and was the first to
+apply this law to the reconstruction of animals from fragments: see his
+monumental work entitled 'Recherches sur les Ossemens fossiles,' 1812.
+
+Cuvier, however, as a strict matter-of-fact man, was incapable of
+appreciating the speculative conclusions which were drawn by his
+contemporaries Saint-Hilaire and Lamarck. On the contrary, he firmly
+stuck to the doctrine of the immutability of species; and, in order to
+account for the existence of animals whose kind exists no longer, he
+invented the famous doctrine of successive cataclysms.
+
+KARL ERNST VON BAER was born in 1792 in Esthonia, studied at Dorpat
+and then at Wuerzburg, where Doellinger introduced him to comparative
+anatomy. For a few years he was a _Privat-docent_ at Berlin; then he
+went to Koenigsberg as Professor of Zoology and Embryology. In 1834
+he became an Academician at St. Petersburg, where for many years he
+was occupied with the most varied studies, chiefly geographical and
+ethnological. The last years of his long, active life he spent in
+contemplative retirement on his paternal estate, and he died at Dorpat
+in 1876.
+
+While still at Wuerzburg he induced his friend Pander, a young man
+of means, to study the development of the chick; and Pander was the
+first to start the theory of the germinal layers from which all the
+organs arise. Baer, however, continued these researches in Koenigsberg,
+and after nine years' labour produced his epoch-making work, 'Ueber
+Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion,'
+Koenigsberg, 1828. Nine years later he completed the second volume.
+He established upon a firm basis the theory of the germinal layers,
+and by further 'reflexions' arrived at the elucidation of some of the
+most fundamental laws of biology. For example, in the first volume
+he made the following prophetic statement: 'Perhaps all animals are
+alike, and nothing but hollow globes at their earliest developmental
+beginning. The farther back we trace their development, the more
+resemblance we find in the most different creatures. And this leads to
+the question whether at the beginning of their development all animals
+are essentially alike, and referable to one common ancestral form.
+Considering that the "germ" (which at a certain stage appears in the
+shape of a hollow globe or bag) is the undeveloped animal itself, we
+are not without reason for assuming that the common fundamental form is
+that of a simple vesicle, from which every animal is evolved, not only
+theoretically, but historically.'
+
+This statement is all the more wonderful when we consider that the
+cells, the all-composing individual units, were not discovered until
+ten years later.
+
+In 1829 Baer discovered the human egg, and later the chorda dorsalis.
+In an address delivered in 1834, entitled 'The Most Universal Law
+of Nature in all Development,' he explained that only from a most
+superficial point of view can the various species be looked upon as
+permanent and immutable types; that, on the contrary, they can be
+nothing but passing stages, or series of stages, of development, which
+have been evolved by transformation out of common ancestral forms.
+
+JOHANNES MUELLER, born at Coblenz in 1801, established himself
+as _Privat-docent_ at Bonn, where in 1830 he became Professor of
+Physiology. In 1833 he accepted the Chair of Anatomy and Physiology at
+Berlin, where he died in 1858.
+
+He was one of the most distinguished physiologists and comparative
+anatomists. By summarizing the labours and discoveries already made in
+the field of physiology, by reducing them to order, and abstracting the
+general principles, he became the founder of modern physiology. But
+he was scarcely less distinguished by his researches in comparative
+anatomy. His 'Vergleichende Anatomie der Myxinoiden,' in _Abhandlungen
+der Berliner Akademie_, 1835-45, and 'Ueber die Grenzen der Ganoiden'
+(_ibid._, 1846), are standard works of lasting value.
+
+Mueller exercised a stimulative influence as a teacher. Many well-known
+men--such as Helmholtz, Gegenbaur, Bruecke the physiologist, Guenther
+the zoologist, Virchow the pathologist, Koelliker and Haeckel--have
+been his pupils.
+
+RUDOLPH VIRCHOW was born in 1821 at Schievelbein, a small
+town in Eastern Pomerania. He studied medicine in Berlin as a pupil
+of Johannes Mueller, and went in 1849 to Wuerzburg, where, under the
+influence of Koelliker, and Leydig the pathologist, he laid the
+foundation of an entirely new branch of medical science--that of
+'cellular pathology.' Since 1856 he has filled the principal Chair of
+Pathology at Berlin. In 1892 he received the Copley medal of the Royal
+Society.
+
+'His contributions to the study of morbid anatomy have thrown light
+upon the diseases of every part of the body; but the broad and
+philosophical view he has taken of the processes of pathology has
+done more than his most brilliant observations to make the science of
+disease.
+
+'In pathology, strictly so called, his two great achievements--the
+detection of the cellular activity which lies at the bottom of
+all morbid as well as normal physiological processes, and the
+classification of the important group of new growths on a natural
+histological basis--have each of them not only made an epoch in
+medicine, but have also been the occasion of fresh extension of science
+by other labourers' (Proc. Royal Soc., 1892).
+
+Virchow has not confined himself to medicine. He takes the keenest
+interest in anthropology and ethnology, on which subjects he has
+contributed many papers. Together with his colleagues Helmholtz the
+physicist, and Du Bois Reymond the physiologist, he has taken a leading
+place in the spreading of natural science; but, unfortunately, he
+did not take to the doctrine of Evolution, and for the last thirty
+years has been its declared antagonist, rarely missing an opportunity
+of denouncing everything but descriptive anatomy and zoology as the
+unsound speculations of dreamers. This has on more than one occasion
+brought him into sharp conflict with Haeckel. His activity is
+astonishing, especially if it be remembered that Virchow has for many
+years been one of the most conspicuous leaders of the Progressists and
+Radicals in the German Parliament and Berlin town-council.
+
+EDWARD DRINKER COPE was born at Philadelphia, Pa. After studying at
+several Continental Universities, especially at Heidelberg, he became
+first Professor of Natural Science at Haverford College, and later
+Professor of Geology and Mineralogy. He died at an early age in 1897.
+As a member of various geological expeditions and other surveys, he
+explored chiefly Kansas, Wyoming, and Colorado; and he published many
+most suggestive papers on the fossil vertebrate fauna of North America,
+and on classification especially of Amphibia and Reptiles.
+
+Among works of a more general philosophical scope may be mentioned 'The
+Origin of the Fittest,' 1887, and his latest work, 'The Primary Factors
+of Organic Evolution,' 1896.
+
+ALBERT VON KOELLIKER, born in 1817, became Professor of Anatomy at
+Wuerzburg. His earlier studies and discoveries contributed considerably
+to the systematic development of the cell theory. In 1844 he observed
+the division and further multiplication of the original egg cell. Next
+year he showed the continuity between nerve cells and nerve fibres in
+the Vertebrata; later, that the non-striped or smooth muscular tissue
+is composed of cellular elements. He demonstrated that the Gregarinae
+are unicellular creatures. In 1852 he went with his younger friend
+Gegenbaur to Messina, where he studied especially the development
+of the Cephalopoda (cuttlefishes and allies); and he produced a
+magnificent work on Alcyonaria, Medusae, and other allied forms. He
+elucidated the development of the vertebral column, especially with
+reference to the notochord.
+
+In 1848 he founded, together with Th. von Siebold, the famous
+_Zeitschrift fuer wissenschaftliche Zoologie_.
+
+A standard work on mammalian embryology is his 'Entwicklungsgeschichte
+des Menschen und der hoeheren Thiere,' a text-book of which the second
+edition appeared in 1879.
+
+At the anniversary meeting of 1897 he received the Copley medal, the
+highest honour which the Royal Society can bestow.
+
+CARL GEGENBAUR was born on August 21, 1826, in Bavaria. He studied
+medicine and kindred subjects in Wuerzburg, and as a pupil of Johannes
+Mueller in Berlin.
+
+In 1852 he went with Koelliker to Messina to study the structure and
+development of the marine fauna. Important papers on Siphonophora,
+Echinoderms, Pteropoda, and, later, Hydrozoa and Mollusca, were the
+result. Soon after his return he was offered the chair of Anatomy at
+Jena, and at this retired spot he produced his most important works,
+devoting himself more and more to the study of the Vertebrata. Since
+1875 he has held the Chair of Anatomy at Heidelberg.
+
+In 1859 he published his 'Principles of Comparative Anatomy'; but in
+1870 he remodelled it completely, the theory of descent being the
+guiding principle. These 'Grundzuege' were followed by a somewhat more
+condensed 'Grundriss,' the second edition of which was published
+in 1878, and has been translated into French and English. In the
+meantime he had broken new ground by the development and treatment of
+certain problems concerning the composition and origin of the limbs,
+the shoulder-girdle and the skull, researches which are embodied in
+his 'Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbelthiere,'
+1864-65-72.
+
+In 1883 he brought out a text-book on human anatomy. This also marked
+a new epoch, because for the first time, not only the nomenclature,
+but also the general treatment of human anatomy, was put upon a firm
+comparative anatomical basis. The success of this work is indicated by
+the fact that it reached the sixth edition in 1897.
+
+Lastly, in 1898, appeared the first volume of what may be called his
+crowning work, 'Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere.'
+
+Gegenbaur is universally recognised, not only as the greatest living
+comparative anatomist, but also as the founder of the modern side of
+this science, by having based it on the theory of descent.
+
+In 1896 he received from the Royal Society the Copley medal 'for
+his pre-eminence in the science of comparative anatomy or animal
+morphology.'
+
+His marvellously powerful influence as a teacher and investigator has
+made Heidelberg a centre whence many pupils have spread his teaching,
+and above all his method of research.
+
+ERNST HEINRICH HAECKEL was born on February 16, 1834, at Potsdam. He
+carried out his academical studies alternately at Berlin and Wuerzburg,
+attracted by such men as Johannes Mueller, Koelliker, and Virchow.
+For years he was undecided what his career should be, whether that
+of botanist, collector, or geographical traveller. Certainly that of
+medicine attracted him least, although in deference to his father's
+wishes he qualified and settled down for a year's practice in Berlin.
+As he himself has told us, he might perhaps have proved rather
+successful as a physician, to judge from the fact that he did not lose
+a single patient. But 'I had only three patients all told, and the
+reason of this is perhaps that I had given on my plate the hours of
+consultation as from 5 to 6 _a.m._'
+
+During the year 1859 he travelled as medical man and artist in Sicily.
+In 1861 he was induced by Gegenbaur, whose acquaintance he had made in
+Wuerzburg, to establish himself as a _Privat-docent_ for comparative
+anatomy in Jena. And there he has remained ever since, filling the
+Chair of Zoology, and having declined several much more tempting offers
+from the Universities of Wuerzburg, Vienna, Strassburg, and Bonn.
+
+Within one year, 1865, he wrote the two volumes of his 'Generelle
+Morphologie der Organismen,' as he himself relates, in order to master
+his sorrow over the loss of his first wife. But he broke down, and went
+to the Canaries to recruit health and strength. The 'Morphologie,'
+which has long been out of print,[25] made scarcely any impression. It
+was ignored, probably because he had placed the old-fashioned study of
+zoology and morphology upon a thoroughly Darwinistic basis.
+
+[25] That this great work is now comparatively rare, although still
+in the second-hand market, may perhaps be urged in excuse of the
+fact of so many attempts made by many authors, both professional and
+amateur, to find fault with or to explain the principles of adaptation,
+variation, heredity, caenogenesis, phylogeny, etc., in complete
+ignorance that all these and many more fundamental questions were fully
+discussed more than thirty years ago in the 'Generelle Morphologie.'
+
+On the advice of his friend Gegenbaur, he gave a more popularly
+written abstract of his 'Generelle Morphologie'--in fact, the
+substance of a series of his lectures--in the shape of his 'Natuerliche
+Schoepfungsgeschichte.' This 'History of Natural Creation,' which
+in 1898 has reached the ninth edition (first edition translated
+into English in 1873), had the desired effect. So also had his
+'Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen,' the fourth
+edition of which appeared in 1891.
+
+It was a lucky coincidence that Haeckel had just finished his
+preliminary academical studies, was entirely at leisure, and
+undetermined to which branch of natural science he should devote his
+genius, when Darwin's great work was given to the world. Haeckel
+embraced the new doctrine fervently, and, as Huxley was doing in
+England, he spread it and fought for it with ever-increasing vigour in
+Germany.
+
+With marvellous vigour and quickness of perception he applied the
+principles of Evolution or the theory of descent to the whole organic
+world, and not only opened entirely new vistas for the study of
+morphology, but also worked them out and fixed them. He was the first
+to draw up pedigrees of the various larger groups of animals and
+plants, filling the gaps by fossils or with hypothetical forms (the
+necessary existence of which he arrived at by logical deductions);
+and thus he reconstructed the first universal pedigree, a gigantic
+ancestral tree, from the simple unicellular Amoeba to Man. Of course
+these pedigrees were entirely provisional, as he himself has over and
+over again avowed; but they are, nevertheless, the ideal which all
+systematists and morphologists working upon the basis of Evolution have
+since been seeking to establish.
+
+Naturally he was vigorously attacked, not only by anti-Darwinians,
+or rather anti-Evolutionists, but also by many of those who, having
+accepted the principle of transformism, ought to have known better.
+Perhaps they thought they did know better. Imperfections or mistakes in
+details of the grand attempt,--and these, naturally, were many,--were
+singled out as samples of the whole, which was ridiculed as the romance
+of a dreamer.
+
+In the end, however, this hostility, narrow-minded and unfair in
+many respects, has done good to the cause. There has arisen an
+ever-increasing school of workers in favour of the new doctrine. Owing
+to renewed research, criticism, corrections in all directions, we
+now know considerably more about natural classification (and this is
+pedigree) than when Haeckel first opened out the whole problem.
+
+Owing to his fearless mode of exposition, regardless of the indignant
+wrath which the new doctrine aroused in certain ecclesiastical
+quarters, Haeckel bore the brunt of almost endless attacks, and had to
+write polemical essays. The result has been that friend and foe alike
+are now working on the lines which he has laid down; most of the ideas
+which he was the first to conceive, and to formulate by inventing a
+scientific terminology for them, have become important branches, or
+even disciplines, of the science.
+
+Most morphologists of the younger generations now take these terms
+for granted, without remembering the name of their founder. It is,
+therefore, perhaps not quite superfluous to mention some of them:
+
+_Phylum_, or stem, the sum total of all those organisms which have
+probably descended from one common lower form. He distinguished eight
+such phyla--Protozoa, Coelenterata, Helminthes or Vermes, Tunicata,
+Mollusca, Articulata, and Vertebrata. The phyla are more or less
+analogous to 'super-classes,' large branches or 'circles,' or principal
+groups of other zoologists.
+
+_Phylogeny_, the history of the development of these various phyla,
+classes, orders, families, and species.
+
+_Ontogeny_, the history or study of the development of the individual,
+generally called embryology. In reality the scope of embryology
+is the ontogenetic study of the various species, and this branch
+of developmental study alone can be checked by direct, 'exact'
+observation, for the simple reason that the individuals alone are
+entities, while the species, genera, families, etc., are abstract ideas.
+
+The _ontogenesis of any given living organism is a short, condensed
+recapitulation of its ancestral history or of its phylogenesis_. This
+is Haeckel's 'fundamental biogenetic law.'
+
+A complete proof of the phylogeny of any creature would be given by
+the preservation of an unbroken series of all its fossil ancestors.
+Such a series will in most cases, for obvious reasons, always remain a
+desideratum. In a few cases, however, the desideratum is nearly met:
+for example, the ancestral line of the one-toed digitigrade horse from
+a four-or five-toed plantigrade and still very generalized Ungulate is
+approaching completion.
+
+Phylogenetic study has to rely upon other help. This is afforded by
+comparative anatomy and by the study of ontogeny. If the latter were
+a faithful, unbroken recapitulation of all the stages through which
+the ancestors have passed, the whole matter would be very simple; but
+we know for certain that in the individual development many stages
+are left out (or, rather, are hurried through, and are so condensed
+by short-cuts being taken that we cannot observe them), while other
+features which have been introduced obscure, and occasionally modify
+beyond recognition, the original course.
+
+Again, the sequence of the appearance of the various organs is
+frequently upset (_heterochronism_). Some organs are accelerated in
+their development, while others, which we know to be phylogenetically
+older, are retarded in making their reappearance in the embryo.
+
+These disturbing or distorting newly introduced features or factors
+show themselves chiefly in connection with the embryonic conditions of
+growth--for example, yolk-sac, placenta, amnion. They all come within
+the category of _caenogenesis_: they are caenogenetic, while the true,
+undisturbed recapitulation is _palingenetic_.
+
+Lastly, some features, so-called rudimentary or vestigial organs,
+instead of disappearing, are most tenacious in their recurrence,
+while others of originally fundamental importance scarcely leave
+recognisable traces, and are, so to speak, only hinted at during the
+embryonic growth of the creature we happen to study. Hence arises the
+philosophical study of 'Dysteleology.'
+
+Among other terms invented by Haeckel, and now in general use, are
+_Metamere_, _Metamerism_, _Coelom_, _Gonochorism_, _Gastrula_,
+_Metazoa_, _Gnathostomata_, _Acrania_, _Craniota_, and _Amniota_.
+
+Hitherto we have dealt with his general work only, a resume of which
+he gave for many years in a course of thirty lectures before an
+audience composed of 'all sorts and conditions of men.' Students of
+biology and of medicine side by side with theologians, incipient and
+ordained, jurists, political economists, and philosophers, crowded his
+lecture-room during the 'seventies to hear the master explaining the
+'natural history of creation' or the mysteries of anthropogenesis.
+Another course of eighty lectures during the winter semester was, and
+still is, devoted to a systematic treatment of zoology, while practical
+classes are reserved for the more select.
+
+His winning personality and fascinating eloquence, combined with a
+clear and concise delivery, have gained the enthusiastic admiration of
+many a student who went to the quiet University town in order to learn
+with his own ears and eyes.
+
+_List of Separate Publications by Professor Haeckel._
+
+'Biologische Studien. I.: Studien ueber die Moneren und andere
+Protisten.' Leipzig, 1870 (out of print). He was the first to
+make observations on the natural history of the Monera, living
+bits of protoplasm, devoid even of a nucleus--_e.g._, _Protogenes
+primordialis_, _Protomyxa aurantiaca_.
+
+'Monographie der Radiolarien.' Berlin, 1862-88. With 171 plates.
+
+'Entwicklungsgeschichte der Siphonophoren.' Utrecht, 1869.
+
+'Plankton-Studien. Vergleichende Untersuchungen ueber die Bedeutung und
+Zusammensetzung der pelagischen Fauna und Flora.' Jena, 1880.
+
+'Metagenesis und Hypogenesis von Aurelia aurita.' Jena, 1881.
+
+'Monographie der Geryoniden oder Ruesselquallen.' Leipzig, 1865.
+
+'Generelle Morphologie der Organismen.' 2 vols. Berlin, 1866.
+
+'Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen,' 1874; 4th
+edition, 1891.
+
+'Natuerliche Schoepfungs-Geschichte.' 2 vols. Berlin, 1st edition,
+1868; 9th edition, 1898. This work has been translated into most
+European languages (the first edition in English, under the title
+'Natural History of Creation' in 1873; the eighth in 1892).
+
+'Monographie der Kalkschwaemme.' 3 vols. Berlin, 1872 (out of print).
+With the subtitle, 'An Attempt to solve analytically the Problem of
+the Origin of Species.' In this work, illustrated by sixty plates, he
+showed that the Calcispongia are individually so yielding, so adaptive
+to external influences, that it is practically impossible to break up
+the whole group into anything like satisfactory species or genera.
+According to predilection, we can distinguish either 1 genus with only
+3 species, or 3, 21, 43 genera, with 21, 111, 181, or 289 species
+respectively.
+
+In this work, in 1872, Haeckel established the homology of the two
+primary layers, ecto- and endoderm, throughout the Metazoa. The attempt
+to do the same for the four secondary layers, as made in the second
+part of his 'Gastraea-theory,' failed. It caused an enormous amount of
+research, hitherto without a satisfactory solution of the problem.
+
+'Studien zur Gastraea-Theorie.' Jena, 1874. The transformation of
+the single primitive egg-cell by cleavage into a globular mass of
+cells (Morula)--which latter, becoming hollow (and then known as the
+Blastula), turns ultimately by invagination or by delamination into
+the Gastrula--is a series of processes which applies to all Metazoa.
+The Gastrula is, therefore, the ancestral form of the Metazoa; and the
+Gastraea-theory, founded by Haeckel, throws light, on the one hand, upon
+the mystery of the phyletic connection of the various animal groups,
+while, on the other hand, it connects the Metazoa, or multicellular
+organisms, with the lowest Protozoa. We come to this conclusion
+becaues the Gastrula arises from and passes through stages which exist as
+independent, permanent organisms among the Protozoa.
+
+Needless to say this Gastraea-theory has been violently attacked in
+detail, with the result that various modifications of the Gastrula,
+until then undreamed of, have become known.
+
+'Monographie der Medusen.' Jena, 1879-81. With 72 coloured plates.
+
+'Reports on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S.
+_Challenger_.' With 230 plates:
+
+ 1. Deep-sea Medusae. 1881.
+ 2. Radiolaria. 1887.
+ 3. Siphonophorae. 1888.
+ 4. Deep-sea Keratosa. 1889.
+
+A short holiday spent on the coasts of the Red Sea produced the volume
+'Arabische Korallen' (Berlin, 1876); and a longer trip to Ceylon has
+been described in 'Indische Reisebriefe,' of which the third edition
+appeared in 1893. The English translation (1883) is entitled 'A Visit
+to Ceylon.'
+
+'Monism as connecting Religion and Science: the Confession of Faith of
+a Man of Science.' 1894.
+
+Haeckels latest work is the 'Systematische Phylogenie' (Berlin, 1896),
+three volumes dealing with Protistae and Plants, Invertebrata and
+Vertebrata. They contain the author's views on the natural system of
+the organic world, both living and extinct. Notable in the work are
+the many reconstructions of ancestral forms which, provided Evolution
+is true, must have existed--hypothetical until they, or something like
+them, are found in a fossil state. Everybody who works systematically,
+and upon the basis of Evolution, does, sometimes unconsciously,
+reconstruct such links, although he may perhaps not see the necessity,
+or have the courage to fix his vision, by assigning to it all those
+attributes or characters which are indicated by deductions from
+comparative anatomy, palaeontology, and embryology.
+
+
+
+
+ THEORY OF CELLS.
+
+
+The vegetable cell was discovered by _Schleiden_, Professor of Botany
+at Jena, in 1838. Next year _Schwann_ found the animal cell.
+
+In 1844 _Koelliker_ discovered that the egg cell, by division and
+multiplication, becomes an aggregation--a heap of new cells.
+
+In 1849 _Huxley_ found the two primary layers (observed long before
+by _Pander_ and _Baer_ in the chick) also in certain Invertebrata,
+the Medusae; and he called these layers 'ectoderm' and 'endoderm'
+respectively.
+
+In 1851 _Remak_, in his 'Untersuchungen ueber die Entwicklung der
+Thiere,' showed the egg to be a simple cell, and that from it, by
+repeated division or multiplication, arise the germinal layers, and
+that by differentiation of the cells of these layers are formed all the
+tissues of the body.
+
+_Kowalevsky_, of St. Petersburg, found the two primary germinal layers
+also in Worms, Echinoderms, Articulata, and other animals.
+
+_Haeckel_, in 1872, found the same in the Sponges. He stated that these
+two germinal layers occur in all animals, except in the Protozoa;
+and that they are homologous, or equivalent, in all the groups of
+animals, from the Sponges up to Man. In 1873, in his 'Gastraea-theorie,'
+he explained the phylogenetic significance, and tried to show the
+homology, of the four secondary germinal layers.
+
+
+
+
+ FACTORS OF EVOLUTION.
+
+
+An organism, as living matter, does not stand in opposition to,
+or outside of, the rest of the world. It is part of the world. It
+receives matter from its surroundings, and gives some back; therefore
+it is influenced by its surroundings. It is acted upon, and it reacts
+upon the latter, and if these change (and they are nowhere and never
+strictly the same) the organism also _varies_. It _adapts_ itself, and
+if it does not, or, rather, cannot, do so, it dies, because it is unfit
+to live in the world, or, rather, in those particular surroundings
+and conditions in which it happens to be. That organism which yields
+most easily, accommodates itself most quickly, has the best chance of
+existence--_survival of the fittest_. 'Fitness' in this case does not
+mean fitness to live, but rather a particular condition which happens
+to fit into the new circumstances.
+
+Adaptation and variation are simultaneous: they are fundamentally the
+same. If there were no adaptability and no variability, those simplest
+of organisms which we suppose to have sprung into existence in the
+pre-Cambrian period would long ago have ceased to exist.
+
+It is the physiological momentum which models the organism, and, by
+causing its adaptations, has produced its organs by change of function.
+Gegenbaur illustrates this most important fundamental truth by an
+excellent example. Suppose that, in an absolutely simple organism, all
+the parts of its exterior are under the same functional conditions,
+so that each part of the surface can take in food, and that this is
+digested, assimilated, in the interior. There is, in this condition,
+not yet any definite organ. If this organism sinks to the bottom and
+becomes sessile, this part is excluded from taking in nourishing
+matter, while the opposite surface alone remains, or becomes more, fit
+for this function. Thus, a simple variation and adaptation has been
+produced, and if the same organism continues in this position, its
+bottom cells will estrange themselves from their original function,
+while those on the top will convey the food into the interior, where
+a cavity will be formed, ultimately with a permanent opening, the
+primitive gut and mouth, both very different from the 'foot.'
+
+Thus, by adaptation and variation the organism acquires new functions,
+organs, features, and it gives up and eventually loses others. Its
+offspring is like it. Like produces like. This is the principle of
+_heredity_. Adaptation, when going on generation after generation on
+the same lines in the same direction, becomes continuous, and has an
+intensifying, _cumulative_ effect. By always weeding out from a flock
+of pigeons those birds which possess more dark feathers than the rest,
+we ultimately produce an entirely white race. We hurry on what Nature
+does slowly.
+
+The inheritance of acquired characters becomes very obvious in the
+following example: The Monera are the lowest living organisms known;
+they consist of a mass of protoplasm, and are still devoid of even
+a nucleus. They multiply simply by division; each half is like the
+other, and like the parent (which by this process has ceased to exist),
+except that each is smaller and has to grow. A certain Moneron,
+_Protomyxa aurantiaca_, is orange-coloured, and its offspring is from
+the beginning of the same colour, and this colour has been acquired
+by that kind of Monera-like protoplasm which thereby has become the
+species called Aurantiaca. We have no reason for assuming that there
+existed from the beginning of life not only colourless, but also red,
+orange, and other kinds of protoplasm. In these simplest of organisms
+the whole process of heredity seems very obvious; but in the higher
+ones, in those which propagate by eggs, the problem is infinitely
+more complicated. It is true that the egg is, strictly, nothing but
+a small part of the parental organism, and we know from everyday
+experience that this single egg-cell has in it all the attributes and
+characteristics of the parent; but these attributes and characteristics
+make their appearance successively, just as the egg cell of a chick has
+neither wings nor feathers, not even a backbone, but develops these
+organs because its parents have them.
+
+The theory that acquired characters are hereditary has often been
+vigorously attacked; but the champions of the negative position have
+not given us anything satisfactory instead. They question, also, the
+principle of adaptation as a factor in Evolution, and substitute
+'variation,' coupled with 'natural selection.'
+
+They point to Darwin's argument: (1) It is a fact that animals and
+plants produce a much greater number of young than in their turn grow
+up to propagate the race; (2) no two of the frequently many individuals
+of the same breed are exactly alike, although the differences may be
+hidden to our perception (this is quite true, because no two entities
+can live in absolutely the same place and conditions); (3) through
+heredity the offspring takes over the faculties and features of the
+parents; (4) what decides which of the many individuals (each one
+possessing some aberration or variation) are to live and to propagate
+the race?--obviously those individual variations which happen to make
+the lucky possessors most fit for the struggle for life.
+
+So far, well; but the 'Neo-Darwinians' imagine that 'adaptation'
+is not the cause, but the result, the effect, of the formation of
+species. According to them, the species are neither adapted by, nor do
+they adapt themselves to, their surroundings. Adaptation is to them
+an accomplished fact, a condition which a species happens to be in
+because its particular variation is the one which, to the exclusion of
+others, suits or fits into its surroundings. Such a view simply takes
+variation for granted, and stipulates it as a something _a priori_,
+without raising the further necessary question, why there should be
+any variations at all. Why, indeed, unless they are caused by external
+influences? Haeckel elucidated this by the conception of adaptation as
+explained in the foregoing pages.
+
+These and kindred speculations have produced some rather curious
+discussions, which not infrequently end in conundrums. If we speak of
+a case of adaptation as a condition, a fact, we easily run the risk
+of getting into confusion about cause and effect. For example: Is the
+stag swift because he has long and slender legs, or are his legs long
+because he is swift? In reality, swiftness and length of legs are cause
+and effect in one. His legs have been so modified as to make him swift,
+because he has put them continuously to whatever was his full speed,
+which in his thick-footed ancestors was probably a very slow one. The
+above question reads, therefore, more sensibly as follows: Has the stag
+become swift because his legs have become long and slender, or have his
+legs become long and slender because he has attained swiftness? Now, we
+see that both halves of the double question are practically the same
+and instantly suggest the answer.
+
+A fundamental difference between artificial machines and living
+organisms is that the former are worn out by use, while the latter not
+only repair the loss caused by use, but are also stimulated to further
+increase. On the other hand, organs which are not put into function,
+or are not used, _degenerate_. The various cells of the organ react
+upon external stimuli by increased activity. Why this should be so is
+another question--perhaps because those which do not would soon be not
+fit to survive. Each cell has a function; the more specialized the more
+intense it is. Every external stimulus, every contact with the outer
+surroundings, is an insult, necessarily of detrimental effect, as it
+disturbs the equilibrium of the cell body. It must, therefore, be of
+advantage to the cells' well-being to return as soon as possible to the
+_status quo ante_, and this can only be done by increased activity.
+
+In the present state of our knowledge, we can approach only the
+simplest cases of acquisition of characteristics. Mostly they are
+so complicated, subject to so many unthought-of conditions, that we
+do not know from which end to approach the problem. Frequently the
+supposed use of certain obvious features is the merest guesswork. This
+applies especially to features to which we are not accustomed (although
+wrongly so) to assign a function--for example, coloration. A green
+tree-frog will with predilection rest on green leaves. The advantages
+of concealment are obvious, and in this case he 'adapts himself' to the
+surroundings by making for green localities: if he did not he would
+be eaten up sooner than his more circumspect comrades. But this making
+for, and sitting in, the green has not _necessarily_ made him of that
+colour. Extreme advocates of one view would argue as follows: Once upon
+a time there were among the offspring of ancestral tree-frogs some
+which, among other colours, exhibited green, not much, perhaps not even
+perceptible to our eyes. The occurrence of this colour, according to
+them, was spontaneous, a freak--as if in reality there were anything
+spontaneous in the sense of being causeless. The descendants of these
+more greenish creatures, provided they did not pair with frogs of the
+ordinary set, became still greener (by accumulative inheritance), and
+so on, until the green was pronounced sufficient to be of advantage
+when competition could set in.
+
+With this view there is always the difficulty of understanding how the
+initial very small changes can be useful, unless we have to deal with
+extremely simple organisms. Is it likely in the case of our frogs that
+an almost imperceptible variation in colour makes them more fit to
+live? We have to assume that 'luck' or chance kept them for generations
+out of harm's reach, until the accumulation of green, hitherto quite
+ineffective, neither harmful nor useful, became strong enough to be
+effective. Such cases undoubtedly happen.
+
+But we can also argue out this problem in a somewhat different way,
+which goes nearer to the root of the whole process. The original
+slight, imperceptible change in pigmentation is not a spontaneous
+freak; it was caused by the direct influence of the surroundings in
+which the particular frogs happened to live, be this factor light or
+temperature or food. Thus it stands to reason that the offspring,
+living under similar conditions, will be acted upon in the same way.
+That factor which has added green to the parents will add green to the
+children, until by accumulative inheritance a more decidedly green
+race is produced.
+
+The offspring of green plants do not become green when grown in the
+dark; the young plants inherit not the green, but the capacity of
+becoming green when acted upon by sunlight. This as an instance of
+direct influence of the surroundings on a substance (chlorophyll),
+which has not yet performed a function. But the kittens of a pair of
+black cats produce black hair before they are born, and we have no
+reason to doubt that the black pigment in their tegumentary structures
+is ultimately referable to the action of the sunlight. In many
+instances creatures living for generations in darkness become white,
+pigmentless, and they regain it when exposed to light. For example, the
+white, colourless Proteus from the caves of Adelsberg becomes clouded
+grey, and ultimately jet black, when kept in a tank whence light is not
+strictly excluded.
+
+Blindness is a very general characteristic of creatures which dwell in
+darkness. There are all stages between total blindness and weak eyes.
+Now, do these blind creatures live in darkness because they are blind,
+or have they become first weak-eyed and then blind because of the
+continuous disuse of their eyes? The former explanation has actually
+been suggested! Individuals not smitten, but spontaneously, as a freak,
+born with sore eyes, have crept into the darkness for relief and have
+produced a blind race! To carry such a notion to the bitter end leads
+to absurdities. Anyhow, it is not understandable where the benefit
+of losing the eyesight arises. It can be explained only by continued
+disuse: witness _Spalax typhlus_, the blind mole, and, above all, the
+Endoparasites.
+
+Let us now take an example to explain the influence of a tangible
+external stimulus. Repeated pressure produces callosities. Although
+they are not exactly beneficial in the shape of corns on our toes,
+they are so on our hands. At any rate, the morphologist can trace the
+development of the footpads, nails, hoofs, and horns, step by step from
+small beginnings. The cells of the Malpighian stratum, of the inner,
+active portion of our epidermis, are excited to extra activity, and
+by continually producing more horn cells than peel off the surface of
+the skin in the normal process of wear and tear cause the formation
+of the pad. It need scarcely be mentioned that hypertrophic growths
+are not necessarily useful; they are often harmful, and in that case
+pathological.
+
+Lastly, a few words about the very difficult question of _teleology_.
+In trying to explain Evolution in a mechanical--sometimes called
+monistic, but in reality natural--way, we exclude anything like a
+set purpose, a goal, or ideal, a final condition which the organism
+strives to attain. Unknown, however, to many morphologists, especially
+embryologists, their writings are full of this teleological notion.
+Indeed, there are many cases in which an organism becomes changed, and
+quickly, too, in a way which cannot but be called reasonable. It starts
+modifications, be they outgrowths, alterations in shape or colour, or
+the making good of injuries received, which by 'short-cuts' produce
+the only advantageous result that can reasonably satisfy the new
+requirement or altered circumstances.
+
+Trees growing in precarious positions, after part of the supporting
+rock has slipped away, throw out new roots, and rearrange some of
+the old ones in the only way which could save the tree. In animals
+which have lost part of a limb the wound closes up, and what is left
+is turned into a serviceable stump--for example, in water-tortoises
+(creatures in which reproduction of lost limbs does not happen). In
+frogs and newts the lost part is reproduced, not correctly, but in a
+good semblance. Tortoises which have had their shell smashed can throw
+off an astonishingly large portion and renew the bone as well as the
+overlapping scutes; but this mending is not neatly done. It serves the
+requirement, but it is patchwork; the new shell is such as no tortoise
+ever possessed before.
+
+Mammals transported into colder countries, or subjected to continued
+exposure, grow a thicker coat; and the same kind of tree which in a
+sheltered valley is tall, large-leaved, and soft-wooded, assumes a very
+different aspect, although perhaps growing into a healthy specimen,
+when planted on a wind-exposed hill.
+
+There is no room, or, rather, no time, to apply to these cases the
+principle of many variations or the long-continued accumulation of
+infinitely small changes. The thing is to be done quickly, or not
+at all. Nor can we explain the mending of a wound, which implies an
+activity of countless cells, simply as a case of, or similar to, the
+reproduction of a lost part; against such an explanation militates the
+almost absolute unlikelihood of that precise injury having happened
+before to any of the creature's ancestors.
+
+Still, I think we are brought near the solution of the mystery by
+such considerations. We see no difficulty in the regeneration of a
+few cells, or in the making good of the disturbance suffered by one
+of the most simple organisms; but we become suspicious when we see
+that countless cells, not of one kind, but of the most varied tissues
+and parts of the body, make common cause in remedying a defect in a
+serviceable way.
+
+We must assume that since the beginning of life organisms have been
+subjected to countless insults. We can scarcely speak of a wound in
+an Amaeba; but these insults have always been made good, and whenever
+this was not the case, that particular organism came to an end. As
+these organisms developed into more complicated ones, the possible
+insults became more serious, more complicated; and the organisms took
+adaptive measures so as to be superior to them. This action, I have
+no hesitation in declaring, became by heredity a habit. The whole
+creature became so thoroughly 'imbued' (for want of a better word) with
+the finding of ways and means for meeting sudden, serious conditions,
+that it now acts directly, and produces by a short-cut, with the least
+amount of time and with the smallest possible waste of material, that
+which meets the occasion, thereby saving the life of the individual
+and that of the race. This we cannot but call reasonable and to the
+purpose, although it is all carried out by _causae efficientes_ without
+there being any _causae finales_.
+
+
+
+
+ GEOLOGICAL TIME AND EVOLUTION.
+
+
+One million years is a stretch of time beyond our conception. We can
+arrive at a more or less adequate understanding of what a million
+individuals or concrete things means. Several Continental nations
+can put more than a million men into the field. We can gaze at a
+building which contains as many bricks; and we know that our own body
+is composed of millions of millions of cells. No such help applies to
+time, because that itself is an entirely relative, abstract conception.
+We can imagine what one hundred years are like--a span of time
+seemingly short to the hale and hearty octogenarian, enormous to the
+child, totally inapplicable to certain animals whose whole life is
+crowded into one single day.
+
+Astronomers have long ceased to reckon distances by miles or any
+other understandable unit. They express the distances between us and
+the stars and nebulae by 'years of light.' Try to imagine a unit of
+length equal to that which is passed through by light (186,000 miles
+per second) in one year. Not so very long ago the enormous distances
+resulting from astronomical calculations were looked upon as the most
+serious objection to the correctness of the astronomers' views as to
+the distances which separate our globe from the nearest fixed stars.
+We have not yet accustomed ourselves to reckoning time by some similar
+broadly-conceived standard--say aeons of so many thousand years each.
+
+Unfortunately, we possess no data whatever for calculating the age
+of the successive geological strata. Thanks to Lyell, the theory of
+violent universal cataclysms has been done away with. It is more
+probable that the same agencies have acted which are now changing
+the aspect of the globe; and these changes are slow, as far as we
+know them--at least, as far as the formation of sedimentary strata is
+concerned, and these alone we have to deal with. Various calculations
+have been made, based upon the denudation of the mountains, the
+filling up of the valleys by the debris, the formation of deltas,
+etc. The results give enormous stretches of time, but all of them
+unsatisfactory, because the methods are so very local in their
+application.
+
+The least objectionable attempt is that which, based upon astronomical
+calculations, tried to fix the height of the last Glacial epoch[26] at
+about 200,000 years ago, and asserted that since its beginning in the
+Pliocene epoch as many as 270,000 years have elapsed. The duration
+of the whole Tertiary period has by the same authorities been fixed
+approximately at 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 years. Beyond this we cannot
+venture without the wildest speculation; but we know to a certain
+extent the thickness of the various sedimentary strata, which amount
+in all to from 100,000 to 175,000 feet--on the average perhaps 130,000
+feet, or about twenty miles.
+
+ [26] James Croll: 'On Geological Time, and the Probable Date of the
+ Glacial and Upper Miocene Period,' _Philos. Magazine_, xxxv., 1868, pp.
+ 363-384; xxxvi., pp. 141-154; 362-386.
+
+Unless we prefer giving up all attempt at calculation as absolutely
+hopeless, and thus resign the whole problem, we must at least try to
+arrive at some results, and then see if these cannot reasonably be made
+use of.
+
+Neither geologist nor physicist, and no zoologist, would accept the
+suggestion that these 130,000 feet of stratified rocks have been
+deposited within only as many years, although the average rate of
+deposit would in that case be not more than 1 foot per year. On the
+other hand, an indignant protest is raised against the assumption of
+1,000,000,000 years.
+
+Lord Kelvin[27] has come to the conclusion (from data which various
+other authorities regard as very unsatisfactory) that not much more
+than 100,000,000 years can have elapsed since the molten globe acquired
+a consolidated crust. Further time must have passed before the surface
+had become stable and cool enough to allow the temperature of the
+collecting oceans to fall below boiling-point, and it is obvious that
+life cannot possibly have begun until after this had happened.
+
+ [27] William Thomson: 'On the Secular Cooling of the Earth,' _Transact.
+ R. S. Edinb._, xxiii., 1864, pp. 157-169.
+
+Wallace, in his 'Island Life,' by making use of Professor A. Geikie's
+results as to the rate of denudation of matter by rivers from the
+area of their basins, and estimating the average rate of deposition,
+concludes that 'the time required to produce this thickness of rock
+[Professor Haughton's maximum of 177,000 feet] at the present rate
+of denudation and deposition is only 28,000,000 years.' Our lower
+assumption of 130,000 feet thickness would give only 20,000,000
+years--a rate of 1 foot in 154 years.
+
+Again, if we prefer round numbers to start with, we have only to
+assume that the age of the whole Tertiary period, with its 3,000 feet
+thickness, is 3,000,000 years (_i.e._, 1,000 feet in 1,000,000 years,
+or 1 foot in 1,000 years, surely an excessively slow rate); then
+130,000,000 years would bring us to the bottom of the Laurentian or
+pre-Cambrian deposits. Of course, it is a pure assumption that the
+same rate of destruction and sedimentation applies to the whole of the
+strata; but we know nothing to the contrary, especially if we consider
+the average periods, the quick periods of extra activity, taken with
+the slow periods or those of standstill.
+
+Dana estimated the length of the whole Tertiary period at one-fifteenth
+of the Mesozoic and Palaeozoic combined. If we take the duration of the
+Tertiary period, as before, as 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 years, the total
+will amount to from 45,000,000 to 60,000,000 years.
+
+Lastly, Walcott[28] has estimated the duration of the Palaeozoic,
+Mesozoic, and Caenozoic or Tertiary epochs at about 17,000,000,
+7,000,000 and 3,000,000 years respectively, giving 27,700,000 years
+from the beginning of the Cambrian; and Williams[29] has calculated the
+relative duration of the smaller epochs. See the table on p. 149.
+
+The results of all these calculations fall surprisingly well within
+the limits of Lord Kelvin's allowance. Of course they are based upon
+assumptions, but none of them is inherently unreasonable; and it
+was my purpose to draw attention to the surprising coincidence in
+the closeness of these results, perhaps too good to be true. Such
+calculations are considered close enough if they range within a few
+multiples of each other.
+
+ [28] 'Geological Time as indicated by the Sedimentary Rocks of North
+ America.' _Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci._, xlii., 1893, pp. 129-169.
+
+ [29] Henry Shaler Williams, 'Geological Biology.' New York, 1895.
+
+Zoologists have fallen into the habit of requiring enormous lengths of
+time for the evolution of the animal kingdom. We know that Evolution is
+at best a slow process, and the conception of the changes necessary to
+evolve man from monkey-like creatures, these from the lowest imaginary
+mammals, these from some reptilian stock, thence descending to Dipnoan
+fish-like creatures, and so on back into Invertebrata, down to the
+simple Monera--this conception is indeed gigantic. Innumerable, almost
+endless, slow changes require seemingly unlimited time, and as time is
+endless, why not draw upon it _ad libitum_?
+
+Huxley pointed out that it took nearly the whole of the Tertiary epoch
+to produce the horse out of the four-toed Eohippos, and that, if we
+apply this rate to the rest of its pedigree, enormous times would
+be required. This is, however, a very misleading statement, which
+necessitates considerable reduction, in conformity with our increased
+palaeontological knowledge. Animals of the genus Equus--namely,
+Ungulata, with one toe, and with a certain tooth pattern--from the
+Upper Miocene of India are now known. Moreover, it is not simply a
+question of the gradual loss of the side-toes. The change from the
+fox-sized little Eohippos and Hyracotherium, so far as skull, teeth,
+vertebral column, and limbs are concerned (about the soft parts we know
+next to nothing), is a very great one indeed.
+
+Elephants and mammoths seem to have developed very rapidly. None are
+known from Eocene strata; but towards the end of the Miocene they had
+spread over Asia, Europe, and North America, and that in great numbers.
+The Eocene Amblypoda are still so different that we hesitate to connect
+them ancestrally with the elephants.
+
+The Pinnipedia (seals and walruses) are strongly modified fissiped
+Carnivora, and have existed since at least the Upper Miocene; the
+transformation must have been accomplished within the Miocene period.
+
+We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that various groups have from the
+time of their first appearance burst out into an exuberant growth of
+modifications in form, size, and numbers, into all possible--and one
+might almost say impossible--shapes; and they have done this within
+comparatively short periods, after which they have died out not less
+rapidly. It seems almost as if these go-ahead creatures had, by
+accepting every possible modification and carrying the same to the
+extreme, too quickly exhausted their plasticity--which, after all,
+must have limits--thereby becoming unable to meet successfully the
+requirements of further changes in their surroundings. The slowly
+developing groups, keeping within main lines of Evolution, and not
+being tempted into aberrant side-issues, had, after all, a much better
+chance of onward evolution.
+
+A good example of the former are the Dinosaurs. We do not know
+their ancestors; but we have here to deal only with their range of
+transformation. The oldest known forms occur in the Upper Trias; they
+attain their most stupendous development in the Upper Jurassic and in
+the Wealden; and they have died out with the Cretaceous epoch. But
+already some of their earliest forms had assumed bipedal gait, and the
+Oolitic Compsognathus had developed almost bird-like hind-limbs.
+
+On the other hand, there are many instances of extremely slow
+development--facts which raise the difficult question of 'persistent
+types.' Are these due to a state of perfection which cannot be improved
+upon? Or are they due to a kind of morphological consolidation (not
+necessarily specialization) which can no longer yield easily, so that
+therefore through changes in their surroundings they may come to an end
+sooner than more plastic groups?
+
+Struthio, the ostrich; Orycteropus, the Cape ant-eater; Tapirus, and
+many others, existed in the Miocene age practically as they are
+now; but pre-Pliocene dolphins, cats, monkeys, stags, all belong to
+closely-allied and well-defined 'genera,' but different from the living
+forms.
+
+Alligators and crocodiles are known from the Upper Chalk; Tomistoma
+since the Miocene; Gavialis since the Pliocene.
+
+The oldest surviving reptile is Sphenodon, the Hatteria of New Zealand,
+a fair representative of what generalized reptiles of the later
+Triassic period seem to have been like; and to the same period belongs
+Ceratodus, the Australian mud-fish, hitherto the oldest known surviving
+genus of a very ancient and low type so far as Vertebrata are concerned.
+
+Now let us see if the above estimates of geological time are so utterly
+inapplicable to animal evolution. On purpose we take one of the lowest
+estimates, about 28,000,000 years, and apportion them equally to the
+various strata or epochs.
+
+The original owner of the famous Trinil skull, a _Pithecanthropus
+erectus_, lived, according to some, in the Late Pliocene, according
+to others in the Early Plistocene, period--that is to say, somewhere
+about the beginning of our last Glacial epoch, some 270,000 years ago.
+Assuming that he and his like reached puberty at sixteen to twenty
+years of age, about 17,000 generations would lie between him and
+ourselves, or, to put it more forcibly, between him and the lowest
+living human races--say the Ceylonese Veddahs. Only 250 generations,
+at twenty years, carry us back to 3000 B.C. (_i.e._, beyond
+the ken of history); and if it be objected that the differences between
+the oldest inhabitants of Egypt, the Naquada, and the present Fellahin
+are very slight, we are welcome to multiply these differences sixty
+or seventy fold, in order to arrive at the Pithecanthropus level.
+But these Naquada had no metal implements, and there cannot be the
+slightest doubt that the development of the human race went on by leaps
+and bounds after certain discoveries had been made--to wit, the use
+of implements and that of fire. That creature which first took up a
+stone or a branch and wielded it thereby got such an enormous advantage
+over his fellow-creatures that his mental and bodily development went
+on apace. The same applies to the improvement of speech. We assume the
+single, monophyletic origin of mankind at one place, in one district;
+and the differences between some of the races of man are great enough
+to constitute what we might call species. Compare the Venus of Milo,
+that noble expression of the ancient Greeks' notion of female beauty,
+with the 'products of art' of the Veddahs or the dwarfs of Central
+Africa, or think of the beau-ideal which a Michael Angelo could
+possibly have evolved if he had never seen any but such people.
+
+ _TIME AND EVOLUTION_
+
+ ======================================================================
+ I. |II.| III. | IV. | V. |VI.| VII.
+ | | | | | |Generations.
+ -----------+---+-----------+----------+--------------+---+------------
+ |} |} |} |Adam and Eve | | 250
+ Recent |} 5|} |} |Man, contem- | | 3,500
+ Plistocene |} |} |} 270,000| porary with | |
+ | |} |} | Reindeer | |
+ | |} |} | in France | |
+ Pliocene -|} |} 3,000,000| |_Pithecanthro-| 16| 17,000
+ |} |} |} 600,000| pus erectus_| |
+ Miocene -|}10|} |} |Anthropoid | 10| 60,000
+ |} |} |}2,100,000| Apes | |
+ Eocene -|} |} |} |Lemures | 5| 420,000
+ | | | | | |
+ Cretaceous | 10|} | 3,600,000| | |
+ Jurassic - | 5|} | 1,800,000| | |
+ Rhaetic -|} |} |} |Prototheria, | 3| 1,800,000
+ |} |} |} | or first | |
+ |} |} 7,200,000|} | Mammalia | |
+ Keuper -|} |} |}1,800,000| | |
+ Muschel- |} 5|} |} | | |
+ kalk |} |} |} | | |
+ New Red |} |} |} |Theromorpha | 4| 425,000
+ Sandstone| | | | | |
+ Magnesian |} |} |} | | |
+ Limestone|} |} |} | | |
+ Lower Red |} |} |} |Proreptilia | 4| 250,000
+ Sandstone|} |} |}4,000,000| | |
+ Coal- |}15|} |} |Eotetrapoda | 4| 500,000
+ measures |} |} |} | | |
+ Mountain |} |}17,500,000|} | | |
+ Limestone | |} | | | |
+ Devonian -| 15|} | 4,000,000|Dipnoi and | 5| 1,000,000
+ | |} | |Crossopterygii| |
+ Silurian -| 10|} | 2,700,000|First fishlike| 3| 900,000
+ | |} | | creatures | |
+ Ordovician | 10|} | 2,700,000| | |
+ Cambrian -| 15|} | 4,000,000| Sum total of| |
+ Laurentian | | | | generations| | ---------
+ Archaean | | | | (about) | | 5,375,000
+ or Meta- | | | | | |
+ morphic | | | | | |
+ ======================================================================
+
+EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE ON P. 149.
+
+ Column I. contains the names of the successive sedimentary strata.
+
+ " II. contains the percentage of the duration of the various epochs,
+ according to _Williams_, the time from the Cambrian until recent times
+ being taken as 100.
+
+ " III. gives the estimated duration in years of the Palaeozoic,
+ Mesozoic, and Caenozoic periods, according to _Walcott_.
+
+ " IV. gives in years the duration of the various smaller epochs, as
+ computed from Walcott and Williams' statements.
+
+ " V. Representatives of stages of the ancestral line of man. The
+ names stand in the level of the stratum in which they have made their
+ first appearance.
+
+ " VI. contains the number of years which, in the present
+ calculation, have been assumed necessary for the animal to reach
+ puberty.
+
+ " VII. contains the number of generations which can have elapsed
+ from stage to stage. For example, 60,000 generations separate the
+ earliest known anthropoid apes from Pithecanthropus.
+
+Let us follow the descent of man further back. The next stage,
+reckoning backwards, is that from Pithecanthropus to _bona-fide_
+anthropoid apes. They are represented in the Miocene by various
+genera--_e.g._, Pliopithecus and Dryopithecus. According to Croll and
+Wallace, 850,000 years ago carry us into the Miocene epoch. Assuming
+that these apes lived about 600,000 years before Pithecanthropus,
+namely, in the later half of the Miocene, and taking puberty at ten
+years of age, a high estimate, we get not less than 60,000 generations.
+
+2. From Apes back to lowest Lemurs in the lowest Eocene. The date of
+Eocene being fixed at 3,000,000, we have about 2,100,000 years for this
+stage; assuming as much as five years for puberty, this results in
+420,000 generations.
+
+3. From Lemures to Prototheria. The earliest known mammalian remains
+come from the Rhaetic, or top formation of the Triassic epoch; allowing
+for the Rhaetic only 100,000 years, we have to add the whole of the
+Jurassic and Cretaceous, in all about 5,500,000 years. Assuming three
+years for a generation, we get 1,800,000 generations.
+
+4. From Prototheria to something like the Theromorpha at the bottom of
+the Triassic strata. A duration of 1,700,000 years divided by four
+gives 425,000 generations.
+
+5. From Theromorpha to Proreptilia, represented by Eryops and Cricotus
+from the Lower Permian of Texas. Allowing 1,000,000 years, each
+generation at four years, we obtain 250,000 generations.
+
+6. From Proreptilia to Eotetrapoda, the first terrestrial Vertebrata,
+represented by something like the Stegocephali, the earliest of which
+are known from the Coal-measures. Assuming them to have come into
+existence at the bottom of the Coal-measures, for the duration of which
+we may guess 2,000,000 years, we get, with four years' allowance for
+puberty, 500,000 generations.
+
+7. From Eotetrapoda to a not yet separated or differentiated group
+of Crossopterygian and Dipnoan fishes, both of which are known from
+Devonian strata. The duration of the latter has been computed at
+4,000,000 years, which, with 1,000,000 for the Mountain Limestone
+formation, gives us 5,000,000 for this stage. Assuming, for the sake
+of round numbers, as much as five years for a generation, we get
+1,000,000 generations.
+
+8. Earliest stage, down to the first fish-like creatures. Teeth and
+spines indicating the existence of fishes are known from the Upper
+Silurian. By carrying the earliest fishes down to the bottom of the
+Silurian, with 2,700,000 years' duration, and allowing three years for
+attaining puberty, the calculation results in 900,000 generations.
+
+Further back we cannot go. We do not know of any Vertebrate remains
+from the Ordovician and Cambrian, which together represent 6,700,000
+years, enough for at least half as many generations of Prochordate
+creatures. The pre-Cambrian or Laurentian epoch lies quite beyond the
+reach of calculation, nor have we any trustworthy fossil remains of
+living matter from these strata, to which, however, Haeckel and others
+refer the first beginnings of life.
+
+All the above calculations are, of course, only approximate. What we
+do know is the existence of representatives of the stages, our proofs
+being the fossils; but when we refer the origin of the Eotetrapoda,
+for example, to the bottom and not somewhere to the middle of the
+Coal-measures, we are guessing merely. Alterations in the levels
+assumed for the various stage-representatives will, of course, alter
+the result of the number of generations; but the leading idea, as
+a whole, is not thereby upset. The fact remains that in the Upper
+Silurian we have fishes; from the Coal-measures onwards, fishes and
+Amphibia; since the Permian, fishes, Amphibia, and reptiles; since the
+end of the Trias these three classes and the Mammalia; and lastly, at
+least since the Plistocene, man himself. If Evolution is true at all,
+the transformation from early fish-like creatures to man has come about
+within these epochs. Being able to assign a time of duration to each
+of them, with an approximate total of 21,000,000 years, we are also
+able to put the whole ancestral series to a test by expressing each
+great stage in generations. The result is very satisfactory. The whole
+enormous stretch from the lowest fish-like creatures to man has been
+resolved into more than 5,000,000 successive generations, and each of
+these means a little step forwards in onward Evolution.
+
+Nothing is to be gained for the understanding of our problem of
+Evolution if we multiply this enormous number of generations by ten
+or any other multiple. We are not able to conceive changes so small
+as those which necessarily have existed between Pithecanthropus and
+man if the whole striking difference is analysed into 17,000 steps.
+Every one of these stages in the modifications of the muscles, the
+skeletal framework, increase of brain, shortening of the trunk,
+lengthening of the legs, improvement of the hands, loss of the hairy
+coat, etc., is truly microscopical, imperceptible, just as the
+Evolutionist imagines the whole process to have been. Again, where is
+the difficulty implied by the change from an air-breathing, in many
+structural points half-amphibian, fish into a primitive land-crawling
+four-footed creature, if we are allowed to resolve the transformation
+into 1,000,000 stages? So far from there being any difficulty, rather
+does it appear questionable if so many infinitely small changes have
+been necessary to bring about this result.
+
+One thousand years make apparently no difference in the evolution of
+animals, nor does one second change the aspect of the hands on the
+face of a clock, nor did Julius Caesar's commission of scientific men
+appreciate the error of about eleven minutes in the length of the year
+beyond its real value; but now the Russians are, owing to this neglect,
+nearly two weeks behind the civilized nations.
+
+
+ THE END.
+
+
+ BILLING AND SONS, PRINTERS, GUILDFORD.
+
+
+ By PROFESSOR ERNST HAECKEL
+
+
+ MONISM;
+ OR,
+ The Confession of Faith of a Man of Science.
+
+ Translated from the German by J. D. F. GILCHRIST.
+
+ _Crown 8vo., cloth. Price 1s. 6d. net._
+
+'We may readily admit that Professor Haeckel has stated his case with
+the clearness and courage which we should expect of him, and that
+his lecture may be regarded as a fair and authoritative statement
+of the views now held by a large number of scientifically educated
+people.'--_Times._
+
+'The Monism, which is the substance of his faith, is thus defined by
+him: "Our conviction that there lives one spirit in all things, and
+that the whole cognizable world is constituted, and has been developed,
+in accordance with one common fundamental law." As the confession
+of a distinguished man of science, this little work deserves to be
+read.'--_North British Daily Mail._
+
+'This "Confession of Faith" was delivered by the great German
+scientist, its author, as an extemporaneous address at Altenburg
+rather more than two years ago. There are, no doubt, a large number of
+English readers who will welcome a translation, for this "connecting of
+religion and science" has long troubled many earnest students of modern
+science.'--_Publisher's Circular._
+
+'This is a little book of great daring, an example of the wild
+speculative flights of one of the very ablest and greatest of our
+contemporary men of science.'--_Aberdeen Free Press._
+
+'The address, whatever we may think of its conclusions, is, however,
+most interesting reading, and is admirably done into English by the
+translator.'--_Literary World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., price 7s. 6d. net._
+
+ SOURCES OF THE APOSTOLIC
+ CANONS.
+
+ _With a Treatise on the Origin of the Readership and other Lower Orders._
+
+ By Professor ADOLF HARNACK.
+
+ Translated by LEONARD A. WHEATLEY.
+
+ _With an Introductory Essay on the Organization of the Early Church
+ and the Evolution of the Reader._
+
+ By the Rev. JOHN OWEN, Author of 'Evenings with the Skeptics.'
+
+'Dr. Adolf Harnack is at the present time undoubtedly the leading
+liberal authority in Germany on matters connected with early Christian
+history.'--_The Times._
+
+'Those who are interested in early Church history know how to prize
+anything from the pen of Prof. Harnack. They will not be disappointed
+with the present paper, in which, with his accustomed learning and
+acute criticism, he annotates and comments upon the fragments of
+primitive church law which partly form the basis of the Apostolic
+Canons.'--_British Weekly._
+
+'The wide circulation of this volume would be of the happiest augury
+for a more scientific and worthy conception of the organization of the
+primitive Church.'--Dr. MARCUS DODS in _The Bookman_.
+
+
+
+ _Crown 8vo., cloth, price 1s. 6d. net._
+
+ CHRISTIANITY AND HISTORY.
+
+ By ADOLF HARNACK.
+
+ Translated, with the Author's sanction, by THOMAS BAILEY
+ SAUNDERS, with an Introductory Note.
+
+'It is highly interesting and full of thought. The short introductory
+note with which Mr. Saunders prefaces it is valuable for its
+information and excellent in its tone.'--_Athenaeum._
+
+'A singularly able exposition and defence of Christianity, as seen in
+the newer light, by one of the most learned and acute "evangelical"
+critics of Germany. The essay is a masterly one.'--_Glasgow Herald._
+
+' ... We hope the lecture will be widely read.'--_Primitive Methodist
+Quarterly Review._
+
+'The lecture itself is weighty in its every word, and should be read
+and re-read by those desiring to have in a nutshell the central
+positions of modern Christianity.'--_Christian World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Third Edition. Crown 8vo., cloth, price 5s._
+
+ SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF
+ ISRAEL AND JUDAH.
+
+ By J. WELLHAUSEN,
+ PROFESSOR AT MARBURG.
+
+'This work is now issued for the third time as an independent treatise.
+It admirably epitomizes the subject, and exhibits on almost every page
+evidences of Professor Wellhausen's profound study.'--_Publishers'
+Circular._
+
+'We would only say that those who differ from his critical views will
+yet do well to study them, and to read this history in which he applies
+them. Its separate publication, in a handy form and at a moderate
+price, makes it generally accessible.'--_North British Daily Mail._
+
+'The publication in a separate form of Professor Wellhausen's article
+in the "Encyclopaedia Britannica" on "Israel" will be very warmly
+welcomed by many readers.'--_Manchester Guardian._
+
+'We are very glad to welcome an edition of Professor Wellhausen's
+"Sketch of the History of Israel and Judah" in a convenient and handy
+form. This is the first time it has appeared in a separate form. It is
+already known to students; it ought now to become popular. It is based
+on the learned author's studies in Hebrew literature and history, and,
+though not controversial in form, it differs totally from orthodox
+presentations of the subject.'--_Westminster Review._
+
+'A sketch which has created such widespread and profound interest as
+this could not be kept in the pages of a voluminous encyclopaedia.
+Wellhausen's words necessarily have exceptional importance, even in
+the esteem of those who differ from him _toto coelo_.'--_Baptist
+Magazine._
+
+'The profound scholarship of the author does not elevate his writing
+above the interest of the general reader, and a vivid idea of the
+involved Jewish history is obtainable from this volume.'--_Christian
+Advocate._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., boards, price 3s. 6d. net._
+
+ A CLASSIFICATION OF
+ VERTEBRATA,
+ RECENT AND EXTINCT.
+
+ With Diagnoses and Definitions, a Chapter on Geographical
+ Distribution, and an Etymological Index.
+
+ By HANS GADOW, M.A., PH.D., F.R.S.,
+
+ STRICKLAND CURATOR AND LECTURER ON ZOOLOGY TO THE UNIVERSITY,
+ CAMBRIDGE.
+
+'At the end of his work Dr. Gadow adds a useful chapter on the
+geographical distribution of the Vertebrata, with a table showing
+the approximate number of the known recent species. He also gives
+a fanciful though striking calculation to show how some groups are
+still in the ascendant, while others are distinctly declining. The
+little volume is indeed a welcome addition to the biological student's
+library, and it deserves the wide circulation which its author's
+eminence is likely to ensure for it.'--_Natural Science._
+
+'It is a book, it need hardly be said, for the student; it is simply
+a list of the principal sub-divisions of backboned animals, with just
+as much definition as is needed. It may be regarded as an exceedingly
+concentrated extract of a full text-book of the vertebrates.'--_Daily
+Chronicle._
+
+
+
+ _Demy 8vo., cloth, price 21s._
+
+ IN NORTHERN SPAIN.
+
+ By Dr. HANS GADOW, M.A., PH.D., F.R.S.
+
+ _Containing Map and 89 Illustrations._
+
+'Some years back "Wild Spain," one of the best books of its kind,
+made you desirous of knowing more of the country. And Hans Gadow has
+deepened this feeling in his excellent volume "In Northern Spain,"
+and that to an enormous extent. Dwelling at inn or farm, or in their
+own tent, they saw the country as it has been seen but rarely, and
+they came to know the inhabitants as they can be known in no other
+fashion.'--_Black and White._
+
+'To persons visiting the provinces with which the author deals, this
+book will be invaluable, and will do more to point their attention to
+objects of interest than existing guide-books of Spain, most of which
+are out of date.'--_The Field._
+
+'About the best book of European travel that has appeared these many
+years.'--_Literary World._
+
+
+ LONDON: ADAM & CHARLES BLACK, SOHO SQUARE.
+
+
+Transcriber's Notes
+
+ Variations in spelling, punctuation and hyphenation have been retained
+ except in obvious cases of typographical errors.
+ Inconsistent hyphenation and spelling are as in the oringinal.
+ Italics are shown thus _italic_ and underline thus *underline*.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Last Link, by Ernst Haeckel
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LAST LINK ***
+
+***** This file should be named 44541.txt or 44541.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/4/4/5/4/44541/
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Les Galloway and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+ www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
+North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
+contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
+Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
diff --git a/old/44541.zip b/old/44541.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d2f8704
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/44541.zip
Binary files differ