diff options
| author | nfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org> | 2025-03-03 19:19:27 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | nfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org> | 2025-03-03 19:19:27 -0800 |
| commit | 32ecd425df44746827a5fbf9d0cf5238003bc56c (patch) | |
| tree | d12a17f1897331293cbaa906a88daf5bea4775a7 | |
| parent | e81e01581ca68dd9333809203be6a00f8b53ddec (diff) | |
| -rw-r--r-- | 44509-0.txt | 400 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44509-0.zip | bin | 190465 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44509-8.txt | 9506 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44509-8.zip | bin | 189294 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44509-h.zip | bin | 518810 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44509-h/44509-h.htm | 375 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44509.txt | 9506 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44509.zip | bin | 189010 -> 0 bytes |
8 files changed, 4 insertions, 19783 deletions
diff --git a/44509-0.txt b/44509-0.txt index 88897bf..bf48ba7 100644 --- a/44509-0.txt +++ b/44509-0.txt @@ -1,41 +1,4 @@ -The Project Gutenberg eBook, A Manual of the Historical Development of -Art, by G. G. (Gustavus George) Zerffi - - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - - - - - -Title: A Manual of the Historical Development of Art - Pre-Historic--Ancient--Classic--Early Christian; with Special Reference to Architecture, Sculpture, Painting, and Ornamentation - - -Author: G. G. (Gustavus George) Zerffi - - - -Release Date: December 25, 2013 [eBook #44509] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: UTF-8 - - -***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL -DEVELOPMENT OF ART*** - - -E-text prepared by David Garcia, Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe, and the Online -Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images -generously made available by the Google Books Library Project -(http://books.google.com) - - +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44509 *** Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this file which includes the original illustrations. @@ -9146,363 +9109,4 @@ The original letters and symbols might appear in the UTF-8 and HTML versions. Devices unable to display such characters may substitute question marks or other placeholders. - - -***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL -DEVELOPMENT OF ART*** - - -******* This file should be named 44509-0.txt or 44509-0.zip ******* - - -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: -http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/4/4/5/0/44509 - - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at - www.gutenberg.org/license. - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 -North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email -contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the -Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44509 *** diff --git a/44509-0.zip b/44509-0.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index a51254f..0000000 --- a/44509-0.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/44509-8.txt b/44509-8.txt deleted file mode 100644 index a84ed91..0000000 --- a/44509-8.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9506 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg eBook, A Manual of the Historical Development of -Art, by G. G. (Gustavus George) Zerffi - - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - - - - - -Title: A Manual of the Historical Development of Art - Pre-Historic--Ancient--Classic--Early Christian; with Special Reference to Architecture, Sculpture, Painting, and Ornamentation - - -Author: G. G. (Gustavus George) Zerffi - - - -Release Date: December 25, 2013 [eBook #44509] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 - - -***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL -DEVELOPMENT OF ART*** - - -E-text prepared by David Garcia, Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe, and the Online -Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images -generously made available by the Google Books Library Project -(http://books.google.com) - - - -Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this - file which includes the original illustrations. - See 44509-h.htm or 44509-h.zip: - (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/44509/44509-h/44509-h.htm) - or - (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/44509/44509-h.zip) - - - Images of the original pages are available through - the Google Books Library Project. See - http://www.google.com/books?id=sqIZAAAAYAAJ - - -Transcriber's note: - - Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_). - - Text enclosed by equal signs is in bold face (=bold=). - - Greek transliterations are enclosed by curly braces - (example: {kosmos}). - - The transcriber's descriptions of illustrations are in - parentheses. - - - - - -A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART. - - -[Illustration: CHART OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART.] - - -A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART - -Pre-historic--Ancient--Classic--Early Christian - -With Special Reference to Architecture, Sculpture, Painting, -and Ornamentation - -by - -G. G. ZERFFI, PH.D., F.R.S.L. - -One of the Lecturers of H. M. Department of Science and Art. - - - - - - - -London: -Hardwicke & Bogue, 192 Piccadilly, W. -1876. - -London: Printed by -Spottiswoode and Co., New-Street Square -and Parliament Street - -The right of translation is reserved. - - - - - This Book is Inscribed - TO - E. J. POYNTER, ESQ., R.A. - - DIRECTOR OF THE ART TRAINING SCHOOLS, - SOUTH KENSINGTON, - - IN RECOGNITION OF HIS GENIUS AS A PAINTER, - AND OF - HIS UNTIRING EFFORTS IN PROMOTING - HIGHER ART EDUCATION. - - - - -PREFACE. - - -An experience of more than eight years as Lecturer on the 'Historical -Development of Art,' at the National Art Training School, South -Kensington, has convinced me of the necessity for a short and concise -Manual, which should serve both the public and students as a guide to -the study of the history of art. In all our educational establishments, -colleges, and ladies' schools, the study of art-history, which ought to -form one of the most important subjects of our educational system, is -entirely neglected. To suggest and to excite to such a study is the aim -of this book. It would be impossible to exhaust in a short volume even -that section of the subject which I propose to treat, and the most that -can be done is to give outlines, which must be filled in by further -studies. - -Art is at last assuming a better position with us, thanks to the -influence of the lamented Prince Consort, to whom we undoubtedly owe -the revival of the culture of sciences and arts, and the indefatigable -exertions of the Government, aided by munificent grants of Parliament. -But much more is to be desired from the public. If the 'National -Association for the Promotion of Social Science' is a faithful mirror -of our intellectual stand-point, we certainly have not yet attained a -very high position as an artistic national body. For twenty years the -Association has met and has discussed a variety of topics, and this -year, for the _first_ time, it occurred to the learned socialists that -there was such a factor in humanity as art, and the congress allowed -an art-section to be opened under the presidency of Mr. E. J. Poynter, -R.A., the director of the 'National Art Training School.' _Four_ -questions were proposed for discussion, and I gave anticipatory answers -to these, before the congress was opened, in my introductory lecture to -the students of the Art Training School. These answers will serve as so -many reasons for the issue of this book, and I therefore reproduce them -here, with the questions to which they refer. - -1. 'What are the best methods of securing the improvement of Street -Architecture, especially as regards its connection with public -buildings?' - -_Answer._--Architects must be trained in art-history to prevent them -from committing glaring anachronisms in brick, mortar, stone, iron, -wood, or any other building material. Our street architecture cannot -improve so long as we allow any _original_ genius to _copy_ mediæval -oddities, and revive by-gone monstrosities at random, in perfect -contradiction to the spirit of our times. - -2. 'How best can the encouragement of Mural Decoration, especially -Frescoes, be secured?' - -_Answer._--This might be attained by enlarging the area of national -interest beyond horse-racing, pigeon-shooting, and deer-stalking, the -buying of old china, mediæval candlesticks, ewers and salvers, or of -old pictures, that can scarcely be seen; and extending our general -art-support to our own talented artists, even though they may not -all be Michael Angelos or Raphaels. We could allow them to decorate -the walls of our town-houses, public buildings, chapels, churches, -banks, and museums. We must, however, first train their minds to a -correct appreciation of art-history, of the world's history, and of the -glorious History of England, thus enriching their imaginations with the -illustrious deeds of the past, in which they may mirror our present -state, and foreshadow a continually progressing glorious future. For -there is a mysterious and marvellous 'one-ness' in the religious, -social, and artistic development of humanity which I have tried in the -pages of this book continually to point out. - -No civilised and wealthy country on the surface of our globe, can -boast of more heroic deeds on sea and land, in and out of Parliament; -of more splendid conquests by warlike and peaceful means than ours. -The Wars of the Roses, the colonisation of America, the occupation -of India, the peopling of Australia, the struggles of conformists -and non-conformists, of Cavaliers and Roundheads, of Churchmen and -Puritans, of Independents and Royalists, of Papists and Covenanters, -of Iconoclasts and Free-thinkers, all offer stirring scenes; and yet, -if we want to see on canvas pictures of our past, we must turn to -France or Germany for them. I am sorry to say that until lately the -Iconoclasts have borne all before them. As, however, the 'National -Association' has at length consented to allow the discussion of art, -and as words are in general precursors of deeds, we may expect some -results from our awakened interest in art-matters. - -3. 'What is the influence of academies upon the art of the nation?' - -_Answer._--Academies have no influence whatever, if the nation itself -takes no interest in art, and has no art-education from a general, -theoretical, and historical point of view. So long as art is considered -a mere luxury, because a house does not keep out cold and wet better, -if it be outwardly decorated; so long as it is thought that a parlour -need but have red curtains to be a parlour; that our walls may be -covered with any description of hideously-shaped, realistically-wrought -Chinese or Japanese flowers, if they are only kept in greenish or -brownish neutral tints; so long as we fancy that our wainscotings may -be bright light, though the paper above be dark; and that a window is -admirable, if only provided with a pointed arch, and some trefoil or -quatrefoil to keep out as much light as possible; academies can do -nothing. So long as we neglect higher esthetical culture and training -in our public schools, our academy will but reflect this neglect. -In reviewing the past I have throughout endeavoured to show the -close connection of art-forms with the general, social, religious, -intellectual, and moral conditions of the different nations and periods -in which they appeared. It is erroneous to suppose that art has only to -treat of straight or waving lines, of triangles, squares, and circles, -of imitations of flowers, animals, and men, of nature and nothing but -nature. The study of art comprises man in all his thoughts and actions, -and has to add to this the phenomena of the whole outer world, from -crystallisations to the heavenly vault, studded with innumerable stars -at night, or glowing with light and life in colours at day-time. If our -academy were to take this to heart, and expand its curriculum so as to -have the students taught the beauties of Greek, English, and German -poetry, we should not be obliged to turn to foreigners for worthy -illustrations of our immortal Shakespeare, Milton, or even Tennyson. -The art-historian knows that academies neither produced a Pheidias -nor a Praxiteles, neither a Raphael nor an Albert Dürer; neither a -Rubens nor a Holbein; neither a Gainsborough nor a Hogarth; neither a -Canova nor a Flaxman. For art-academies, as mere outgrowths of fashion, -unless rooted in the earnest, artistic spirit of a nation, only foster -mannerism, pander to the general bad taste of the wealthy classes, and -one-sidedly cultivate portrait-painting, whilst they shut out landscape -or historical figure-painting. Academies have rarely encouraged grand -ideas; they create a kind of parlour or bed-room art, with nice, but -very small, sentiments, water-colour effusions and flower imitations, -in which the Chinese surpass us by far. So long as our academy will -have great names on its programmes, as nominal lecturers, so called -because they do not lecture; so long as it will systematically neglect -to teach our rising artists Universal History, Art History, Archæology, -Comparative Mythology, Symbolism, Iconography, Esthetics from a higher -scientific point, and Psychology with special reference to artistic -composition, and so long as these subjects are ignored in our general -educational establishments, we shall in vain try to compete at large -with other nations, however many isolated great artists we may produce. -Artists in all ages reflected in their products the general sentiments -of the times in which they lived, and of the people for whom they -worked; every page of this book bears out this assertion. Art is a -mighty civiliser of humanity and elevates the whole of our earthly -existence, for it purifies passions and pacifies our mind. Art is the -eternally-active genius of humanity. Let our academy acknowledge this, -and it will at least try to imitate the Art Training School at South -Kensington, which has continually worked in the direction of enlarging -the range of the studies of its students. - -4. 'What is the influence upon society of Decorative Art and -Art-workmanship in all household details?' - -_Answer._--If this question had been asked with an eye to business, -we might answer that decorative art makes trade brisk, induces people -to buy ornaments, and fills the pockets of dealers in curiosities. -But this is not our aim. So long as we fail to look upon art as an -earnest and serious study, as important and necessary to our social -wellbeing as either ethics or science, the influence of decorative art -must be confined to enticing people to plaster their walls with all -sorts of China plate, or pay dearly for Japanese trays, screens, or -cupboards, because they have not learnt to distinguish between the -quaint and the comical, the beautiful and the ugly. Their taste is -still on a level with that of untrained children, who have plenty of -money in their pockets, do not know what to buy, and rush to purchase -the ugliest monstrosities. If half the money that is wasted in these -directions were to be devoted to the encouragement of our hard-working -rising artists, we might soon boast of still greater successes than -we can proudly point to, despite the adverse circumstances under -which artists have to labour amongst us. Art with us is still looked -upon as an extravagance, a luxury, as it was with the Romans of -old, and this produces a craving for oddities. We hang up big china -cockatoos, or place big china dogs, or stags with big china antlers, -on our hearth-rugs. We have coarse china frogs and lizards, crabs or -lobsters, from which we eat our fruit or fish; or a life-like salmon -with staring eyes is brought on our table, its back takes off, and we -scoop out the real cooked salmon with which its inside is filled. Form -of dish, association of ideas, and action of the host are more worthy -of anthropophagi than civilised beings of the nineteenth century. So -long as art-history and esthetics are not made regular studies, not -only in art-schools but also in general educational establishments, -and especially ladies' schools, our national consciousness of art in -general and the requirements of our age in particular cannot improve. -Art is a branch of human knowledge, ingenuity, and creative force -in which ladies, trained to appreciate beauty, might be made better -'helps,' than in the kitchen, the pantry, or the larder. The national -wealth of France consists in the nation's superiority in taste and -artistic skill. The French arrange a few artificial flowers with -an exquisite understanding of the juxtaposition of colours and the -combination of forms, and make us pay for a 'bouquet' on a bonnet from -fifty to sixty francs, whilst the raw material costs from five to six -francs; they do the same in terra-cotta, bronze, or iron. So long as -everyone with us thinks himself justified in having his own bad taste -gratified, because he can pay for it, decorative artists will serve -that bad taste in all our household details. Art-history comprises -not merely measurements of temples, heights of spires in feet, or of -statues in cubits and inches. - -We have of late years made gigantic strides in the advancement -of street-architecture, though we do not yet know how to create -perspective views of artistic beauty; we still indulge too much in -mediæval crookedness and unintelligible windings. We still decorate -too gaudily, or, falling into the other extreme, too much in neutral -colours; but we are beginning to understand that man does not live on -stone and brick alone, but also on taste in arranging and decorating -the stone. London, with the exception of some of our monstrous railway -bridges and railway stations, begins to look worthy of its position -as the centre of the world's commerce. Our streets have lately put -on some stately 'Sunday clothing' in terra-cotta, Portland cement, -and iron railings. Our glass and china, our furniture and carpets, -begin to have more variegated patterns, though I am sorry to hear that -foreigners are still generally appointed as the principal modellers. I -base this assertion on the Report on the National Competition of the -Works of Schools of Art for 1876, in which the examiners say: 'Our want -of that workman-like power over the material, which is so noticeable -in all French productions in modelling, is still very conspicuous. As -long as this continues a large proportion of the decorative figure or -ornamental designs in relief made for the English market will be in -the hands of foreign artists.' The panacea of this evil will and can -only be a higher intellectual training, not merely of the faculty of -imitating and combining given forms in nature, but of endowing them -with ideal beauty, fostered by a correct study of art-history. - -There are no illustrations to this work, but I have annexed a long -list of illustrated works on art. My aim in teaching, and writing, -has been consistently to induce my hearers and readers to think and -study for themselves. Bad or even good wood-cuts are by no means -essential in art-books, for we possess in the British, Christy's, -and South Kensington Museums such invaluable art-collections, that -we may write books without illustrations if we can induce readers -and students to verify what we say by a diligent study of these -specimens. Theoretical generalisation ought always to precede our -special studies. We only then know when we are able to systematise, to -group, to draw analogies, or to arrange our details according to some -general principle. If we enter on any study without having prepared -our mind to grasp the connecting links in an artistic or scientific -subject, our knowledge of an incoherent mass of details will only dwarf -our understanding, instead of brightening and clearing it, and we -shall become technically-trained machines, instead of self-conscious -and self-reasoning creators in any branch of art. The Art Library -at the South Kensington Museum is, without any exaggeration, the -completest in the world; it abounds in the best illustrated works of -all nations. Art-books with bad or indifferent illustrations, or even -with good illustrations, are not so much needed as art-books with -unbiased theories, esthetical principles, and philosophical ideas, -which may awaken the power of reasoning in both readers and students. -It is only too often the case that, in seeing bad illustrations, the -student imagines he knows everything about the work spoken of and -produced in outlines. He must, however, go and see for himself. Art -has its own fairy domain and its own most catholic realm, in which -everyone is welcome who can contribute to the improvement, delight, -and happiness of man. To induce readers and students to visit, with -some fore-thought and fore-knowledge, our vast and unparalleled -art-collections, and to convince them, that to detach the study of art -from a correct appreciation of the ideas that engendered its forms, is -an impossibility, was the task I set myself in writing the pages of -this book. - - LONDON: _October 1876_. - - - - -CONTENTS. - - - CHAPTER I. - - PROLEGOMENA. - PAGE - The phenomena of destruction and combination in Nature--The - difference between the sublime and beautiful--Without man - no beauty--Science, industry, and art--The utilitarian - principle--Choice--The realistic, historical, and critical - points of view in art--Crystallisations and their elements - --Symmetry and eurythmy--Proportion, action, and expression - --Man is the symbol of earthly perfection 1 - - - CHAPTER II. - - ETHNOLOGY IN ITS BEARING ON ART. - - The Negro, the Turanian, and the Aryan: their characteristics, - facial angle, amount of brain, and artistic capacities-- - Space and time--Art treated historically--Pottery in its - development--Generalisation and its advantage 22 - - - CHAPTER III. - - PRE-HISTORIC AND SAVAGE ART. - - Traces of man's inventive and decorative force in by-gone - ages--Classification of pre-historic products--The old - stone age--The new stone age--The bronze and iron ages-- - Man's first dwellings--Houses and temples--Lake-or - pile-dwellings in their gradual development--Cranoges - or wooden islands--Art in the western hemisphere--The - stucco in the rock-hewn temple at Mitla in Mexico-- - Difference between art-products in North, Central, and - South America--Cuzco, near Lake Titicaca--Pottery as a - reliable historical record--The wild and fantastic mode - of ornamentation in America, and its causes 32 - - - CHAPTER IV. - - CHINESE ART. - - The Chinese language--The holy books of the Chinese--The - sacred number five--Principle of ornamentation--Their - towns--The wall with the Chinese not yet a completing - part of the building--The enclosure, the frame, and - the substructure--The trellis-work of the Chinese and - its subdivision--Their Tshao-pings and Miaos--Mode of - colouring--Silk-weavings and their usual patterns-- - Feather works and embroideries--Their deficiencies in - painting--Their pottery--Causes of their failings in - art in a higher sense. 45 - - - CHAPTER V. - - INDIA, PERSIA, ASSYRIA, AND BABYLON. - - The Aryans on this and the other side of the Himâlâyan - Mountains--Science and art the offsprings of religion-- - Endeavours to express abstract phenomena in concrete - signs--The symbolic, dialectic, and mythological periods-- - The Indian trinity--The principal divinities of India, and - their analogy with the Egyptian, Persian, and Greek gods-- - Indian epic poetry--The rock-hewn temples and Buddha-- - Stucco ornamentation--Causes of the gorgeousness of - Indian art--Persia and the Persians--Their five cosmical - elements--Historical development--The Zend-Avesta-- - Persepolis and its oldest monuments--Zoroaster--The - Persian trinity--Light and darkness--Why no temples - were constructed--The Babylonians and Ninivites--Their - principles of ornamentation--Their wall decorations 60 - - - CHAPTER VI. - - EGYPTIAN ART. - - The sphinx the emblem of Egyptian art--Long and short - chronologists--Lepsius and his list of Egyptian dynasties-- - State of Egypt under Menes, who ruled 3892 B.C., according - to Lepsius--Division of Egyptian art into periods--The - forty-two holy books of the Egyptians--Their gods of the - first, second, and third orders--The Egyptian trinity--The - pyramidal period--The hieratic style--The Ptolemaic style - --Their mode of ornamentation and symmetrophobia 103 - - - CHAPTER VII. - - HEBREW ART. - - The Hebrews are a mixed race--Social and political condition - of the Jews during 6,000 years--Description of the country - and aspect of nature--Rabbi Manasseh Ben Israel-- - Architecture a sure measure of a nation's social and - political development--Egotistical character of nomadic - traders--The temple and palace of Solomon, the only - architectural efforts of the Jews--Sketch of their history, - divided into eight periods--The tabernacle a tent--The - first temple constructed on its plan--Ben David on the - mysterious empty room above the Holy of Holies--Causes why - the Jews had no art, and never attempted to have any 132 - - - CHAPTER VIII. - - GREEK ART. - - Meshiah (humanity) was first freed by the Greeks in form, - and by Christ in spirit--Aspect of nature--India, Egypt, - and Persia as the component parts of Greek development-- - The different dialects of the Greeks--Their mythology-- - Traces of intelligible facts and historical events in the - Greek myths--Zeus and his character--Prometheus and - Faust--The nine muses and their leader--Greek life a - continuous festivity--Greek poetry and philosophy--Greek - artistic development--The Olympian, Pythian, Nemæan, - and Isthmian games--Greek architecture: the temple-- - Building materials--Site of temples--Proportion--Plan - of temples--The Doric, Ionic, and Korinthian orders and - their subdivisions--The Attic style--Greek pottery and - Greek sculpture--Different periods--The British Museum - and Greek art--Onatas, Ageladas, Kalamis, Pheidias, - Praxiteles, Skopas, and Lysippus--The Parthenon-- - Aphrodite no longer draped--The groups of Niobe, Laokoön, - and the Farnese bull--Causes of the decline of Greek art 153 - - - CHAPTER IX. - - ETRUSKAN ART. - - The first settlers in Etruria--Their gods of the first and - second orders--The ritual of thunder--Temples and tombs-- - Subdivision of tombs--Cinerary chests--Excavations at - Præneste--Pottery and metal works--Their style either - Archaic or Etruskan--Division of Etruskan works of art - into five principal categories 212 - - - CHAPTER X. - - ROMAN ART. - - Characteristic differences between Greeks and Romans--The - triple theocracy of Rome--The mythical period of the seven - kings of Rome--Rome as republic--Roman mythology--Rome - under the emperors--Roman public games--Roman literature - the outgrowth of Greek literature--Polylithic wall - decorations--The arch, cross-vault, and cupola--Periods of - Roman art and their subdivisions--Temples--Fora and - theatres--The mausoleum of Augustus--Hadrian, the divine - architect--Triumphal arches--The baths of Caracalla--The - advent of Christianity 228 - - - CHAPTER XI. - - EARLY CHRISTIAN ART. - - North and south of our globe--Buddhism and Christianity-- - Christ's divine teachings--Romanesque and Byzantine - art-forms--Symbols, allegories, emblems, and myths-- - Catacombs at Rome and Naples--The sacredness of the number - seven--Christian art in its essence and different phases-- - The spiritual element predominates--The first Christian - churches--Constantine--Ravenna and its early churches-- - St. Sophia in the Byzantine style--Migration of northern - nations--Their religious notions--The Teutons turn - Christians--Wood and ivory carvings--Art in its relation - to the progressive development of mankind--Summary and - conclusion 264 - - - BIBLIOGRAPHY for the study of the historical development of - Art 301 - - - INDEX 305 - - - - -MANUAL - -OF THE - -HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART - - - - -CHAPTER I. - -PROLEGOMENA. - - -Gazing at the heavens on a starry night, we see, in addition to -myriads of sparkling worlds floating in the air, a great quantity of -nebulæ--either decayed systems of worlds, or worlds in formation. -Worlds which have lost their centre of gravity and fallen to pieces; or -worlds which are seeking, according to the general law of gravitation, -to form a central body by the attraction of cosmical ether. The one -phenomenon is that of destruction, the other that of new formation. - -This double process is continually repeating itself in the development -of art. Consciously or unconsciously, the artists of the different -nations, at different periods, devote themselves to the dissolution -or reconstruction of artistic products. To become acquainted with -this process, to trace the elements from which art is built up, or the -influences which engender a dissolution of artistic forms, is of the -greatest importance. - -Art must be looked upon as the phenomenal result of certain religious, -social, intellectual, and natural conditions. To trace these -conditions, their origin, influence, and gradual development, by means -of a critical and historical investigation into the causes which -produced them, will be our task. For art is like a mirror: whatever -looks into it is reflected by it. If a poor, untrained imagination -stares into it, no one must be astonished that poor and distorted -images result. - -It is usually accepted as a truism that the essence of art is the -reproduction of nature. Wherever, then, nature were reflected in -the 'Art-mirror,' we should have the best work of art. But this is -not so. For art has to reflect the phenomena of the makrokosm as -a subjectively-conceived mikrokosm. We do not see matters as they -really are, as each thing is surrounded by a thick fog of incidental, -objective, and subjective peculiarities. This fog must be cleared -away, to show us nature in the bright colours of intellectual and -self-conscious idealisation. - -Nature furnishes us with mortar and stones for the building, but the -architect's intellectual power has to arrange these elements, and to -bring them into an artistic shape. Nature furnishes us with flowers, -trees, animals and men; but the ornamental designer or painter has to -reproduce and to group them so as to impress the forms of nature with -an intellectual vitality. - -Before the artist proceeds to his work he must become thoroughly -conscious of the distinction between the SUBLIME and the BEAUTIFUL. -It is essential that he should draw a strict line of demarcation -between the two conceptions; in order not to waste his energies on the -reproduction of objects which are beyond the powers of art. - -During the long period of the cosmical formation of the earth, when -mountains were towered upon mountains, rocks upheaved, islands -submerged; when air, water, fire, and solid matter seemed engaged in -never-ending conflict--nature was _sublime_. The dynamic force appeared -to be the only element, and the counterbalancing static force was -without influence. Gradually vegetable and animal life, in their first -crude forms, commenced to show themselves. - -Zoophites were developed into megatheriums and mastodons. Mammoths -and elks sported on plains which now form the mountain tops of our -continents. Scarcely visible coral animals were still engaged in -constructing mountain chains, and a luxuriant vegetation covered the -small continents. Such transformations, convulsions, and changes are -gigantic, grand, awe-inspiring--sublime, but not beautiful. Whenever -nature is at work, disturbing the air with electric currents or shaking -huge mountains, so that they bow their lofty summits, or when the dry -soil is rent asunder, and sends forth streams of glowing lava, we -are in the presence of the sublime, not of the beautiful. Whenever -man's nature is overawed, whenever he is made to feel his impotence -by the phenomena of nature, he faces the sublime. In art, only a few -divinely-gifted and chosen geniuses have ever reached the sublime. - -When, however, the cosmical forces had expended their exuberant -powers--when a diversified climate had produced those plants and -animals that surround us--when man appeared on this revolving -planet, and by degrees reached self-consciousness as his highest -development--then only beauty acquired existence and dominion on earth. -Without men capable of understanding what is beautiful, art would have -no meaning. - -The aim of science is to vanquish error; the province of industry to -subdue matter, and the vocation of art to produce beauty. The artist -must not neglect science, for he has to be truthful, as error is ugly; -he must make himself well acquainted with matter, for he has to use, -to transform, and to modify it; and, finally, he has to hallow this -scientifically-treated matter by impressing it with the stamp of ideal -beauty. - -The attainment of this, the perfection of art, has been slow and -gradual. Though art, like all the inventions, took its origin in -want and necessity, the _utilitarian_ spirit is the very bane of -art, for art flourishes only under the influence of the very highest -intellectual culture. - -Nature produces like art; but the products of nature are the -unconscious effects of the immutable law of causation. The products of -art are the results of the conscious intellectual power of the artist. -It is the free, yet well-regulated, consciousness of the artist that -elevates his productions into works of art. Undoubtedly the great -store-house of the artist is nature; he learns from nature how to -ornament, but he has to discern, to combine, to adapt, to select, his -forms. The whole success of the artist, in whatever branch he works, -must depend on an earnest and severe use of the word CHOICE. - -'He is truly great who knows the value of everything, and distinguishes -what is more or less great, and what is most estimable, so as to -begin from that, and to apply the genius, and fix the desires upon -the execution of things worthy and great.' This mode of thinking was -followed by the most celebrated and enlightened artists from the -ancient Greeks to our own time. They knew to distinguish that which -was most worthy in nature, and to this they directed their study, -diligence, and industry. Inferior geniuses, because they are attached -to mediocrity, believe that a mere clinging to nature constitutes all -art; and the lowest artists are enchanted with the minutiæ of little -works, taking them for principal things; so that human ignorance passes -from the trifling to the useless, from the useless to the ugly, and -from the ugly to the false and chimerical. - -In treating of the historical development of art, to enable artists -to distinguish and to choose the best, and not only to imitate but -to create consciously for themselves, it is necessary to make them -_theoretically_ acquainted with the progress of art. - -To trace historically the changes art had to undergo is necessary -for all really self-conscious artists. Art with us is still looked -upon as entirely subject to individual taste. Everyone thinks himself -competent to have an opinion on products of art. '_De gustibus non -est disputandum_' is heard not only in our drawing-rooms, but also in -art-circles. This false and utterly untenable adage is the cause of the -chaotic anarchy in our art-world. - -So little as there can be differences in truth, can there be -differences in beauty. It is the duty of philosophy to strive for -truth; it is the task of the theoretical artist to point out what is -beautiful. - -We may treat art from three different points of view:-- - -1. From a _realistic_ point of view, taking nature and geometry as its -basis. - -2. From an _historical_ point of view; showing by antiquarian and -archæological researches its gradual development. - -3. From a _critical_ point of view; propounding abstract principles of -speculative philosophy and esthetics as applied to art. - - -A. - -The _realistic_ school has in later years had an immense influence -with us. Art-critics have almost gone so far as to demand from the -artist a correct rendering of the very stratification of rocks; or -of the different kinds of soil, to such a degree that the farmer -should be able to recognise the ground in which to sow oats or wheat. -Pictures, according to these estheticists, should be geological maps, -mineralogical collections, and, so far as flowers are concerned, -perfect herbariums. When this school takes up the archæological -view, it clings with indomitable tenacity to given forms, and checks -imagination. Art is then only to be handled as the Greeks or Romans -practised it. Either the Gothic or the Renaissance style is to be -slavishly imitated. This school has one great drawback: it considers -all things natural beautiful, and looks upon an imitation of that which -_was_ as better than an exertion of the self-creative originality of -the artist. - - -B. - -The _historical_ school endeavours to bring before our eyes the past, -so as to enable us to understand the present, and to influence the -future of art. This school has followed two divergent directions, the -Antique and the Gothic, the classical or romantic; the one holding that -everything beautiful must be based upon Greek patterns; the other that -all beauty is confined to the Gothic. The writers of these two schools -bewilder the students; either driving them into a cold, soulless -imitation of classic forms, or forcing them to sacrifice everything to -trefoils, pinnacles, tracery, finials, buttresses, thin spires, painted -windows, and pointed arches. - - -C. - -The _critical_ school indulges in tall phrases, mere hypothetical -paradoxes, often startling the world with speculations of the wildest -sort. Art-critics frequently roam in the spheres of surmises; they have -their good points, but often neglect reality, or the historical ground; -they sacrifice everything to the idea, which is with them the only -productive basis of everything existing in art. - -We shall try to be realistic, as it would be vain to attempt to detach -art from the influences of nature; for art borrows its principal -elements from the impressions of natural phenomena. We shall be -historical, and point out the progressive development of art; and, -lastly, we shall endeavour to be critical. Speculative philosophy has -its merits in art. Esthetical criticism suggests new ideas, and new -ideas engender new forms. We shall endeavour to adopt from each of the -three schools what is best. Our age is an age of eclecticism in art. We -must, however, try to prepare for a period of original vitality, which -can only be done by avoiding one-sidedness and heedless originality. -We shall try to suggest and to excite in our readers new thoughts. As -music speaks in sounds, poetry in words, so art in forms; but music, -poetry, and art are subject to certain rules, without which harmony -would become dissonance, poetry an inflated prose, and art a tasteless -entity, of which quaintness will be the only distinguishing attribute. -What we call our sense of beauty is based on those laws which make the -existence of the universe possible. - -The Greeks used for beauty in art the same word, as for order, or the -perfect arrangement of the universe. The word {kosmos} (from which -we have 'cosmetic,' any beautifying application) may teach us how we -should look upon works of art, which ought to be a reflection of the -general laws ruling nature. - -Two forces guide our material and intellectual life. We possess -two means of acquiring knowledge and of practising art: reason and -experience. Impressions from without are the everlasting source of all -our conceptions. Hunger and thirst drive us to seek nourishment, to -become fishers, hunters, herdsmen, or agriculturists. Cold and heat -force us to seek a shelter, to construct wigwams, huts, dwellings on -piles, cottages, houses, palaces, and temples. - -Though order and harmony prevail in the outer world, every atom of -the universe is endowed with an unconscious will or life of its own. -Atoms seek atoms according to inherent laws, or fly from or annihilate -one another. The whole process of life around us appears to be one -never-ending struggle. Apparently there rules only the law of chance -and might; what cannot conquer is conquered. - -History is one long catalogue of appearing and disappearing nations, of -devouring and devoured kingdoms and empires. It is as though generation -after generation had emerged from the spectral past into the sanguinary -present, to destroy or to be destroyed. This conflict in the outer -world is seconded by everlasting conflicts in our inner world. Fear, -hope, love--passions of all kinds, imagination and reality, ignorance -and knowledge, pride and humility, prejudice and wisdom, form an -intellectual hurricane not less destructive than the warfare of the -cosmical elements. Religion, Science, and Art, this divine triad, -step in. Religion excites in us the hope of higher and better morals; -science creates consciousness of the laws according to which we are -governed; the link between cause and effect is traced, and the rule of -arbitrary chance narrowed. Lastly, art throws its beautifying halo on -everything. Thus these three are instrumental in elevating our mind, -expanding our intellectual powers, and bringing harmony and beauty into -the eternal conflict. Faith is the element of religion, experience the -element of knowledge, and beauty the element of art. Whilst faith and -experience are possible without an artistic elevation of the mind, art -must combine the elements of religion and science, and form through -beauty a visible link between these elements. - -The sublime, as we have said, rules in the universe. Clouds chase one -another and are subject to everlasting changes. Trees cover the surface -of our globe, forming woods at random. Mountains are towered up, as if -hurled together by chance. Seas form a bewildering variety of coasts. -Streams wind their paths through mountains and valleys with capricious -irregularity. All these phenomena confuse and oppress us, they engender -an incomprehensible, indistinct feeling in us. But so soon as we begin -with our intellectual force to sift, to separate, and to detach single -phenomena from the general mass--as soon as _choice_ begins to work, -the isolated phenomenon displays at once its symmetrical beauty. - -[Illustration: (Snowflakes)] - -This is the case with crystallisations, the _first_ artistic products -of unconscious nature. If we look at a vast plain covered with snow, -a feeling of sublime cold and wretchedness overcomes us; but if we -take up one isolated snow-flake, and place it under a microscope, we -find that the elements of the crystallised drop of water surround -with harmonious regularity a common centre, which is the body, -from which radiate as integral parts the diversified forms of the -flake. In studying snow-flakes, we find that the three dimensions of -space--height, breadth, and depth, limited by symmetry, proportion and -direction--are the principal elements of every form which in itself has -to represent a detached total. In all the crystallisations there is one -'momentum' of formation--the centre, from which all the parts emanate -perfectly well-balanced and complete in themselves. The elements -of which all artistic works, whether natural or produced by men, -are composed, are the straight line and the waving line. With these -elements we can obtain the three principal conditions of every work of -art--symmetry, proportion, and direction. Snow-flakes may be used in -any direction, and therefore they may be set down as without distinct -direction. The rays with their radiation, however, are formed according -to the principal law of the universe. They represent the _dynamic_ -force; they strive at isolation from the centre which must be looked -upon as their _static_ momentum. Thus in the first artistic products of -nature positive and negative, or rather dynamic and static forces are -clearly perceptible. The horizontal line is the representative of the -static, whilst the vertical line is the indicator of the dynamic force. - -SYMMETRY _is a perfect equality of form to the right and left of a -vertical line on a horizontal base_. - -EURYTHMY _consists in a repetition of variegated forms_. - -In order to produce eurythmy we must confine symmetry within a certain -compass; for this purpose we have the _frame_. Our doors are nothing -but frames for the entering or departing individuals; as our windows -are frames for the landscape, sky, or walls on which we look, or for -ourselves when seen from without. The frame, whether it be real or -imaginary, as the correct limitation of forms, is of the very highest -importance in decorative and pictorial art. - -Eurythmy may be alternating. This alternating principle is observed in -metopes and triglyphs. The alternation may be interrupted by a cæsura -(a mark or sign of rest). Masks, heads of lions, or any other figures -may form the cæsura, as decorative elements in the long lines of the -tops of houses, palaces, or temples. The cæsura, combined with eurythmy -and symmetry, will give us the best patterns for flat decorations, as -in carpets, paper-hangings, keramic works and metal or wood ornaments. - -Applying what we have said of crystallisations to plants and animals, -we find that symmetry is undoubtedly the predominant element in every -flower. The plant developes itself from the ground, which is its -horizontal basis. It shoots up generally in a vertical direction, as a -radiation from our globe. In trees the branches, leaves, flowers, and -fruits are clustered around a central line in eurythmical proportion. -In flowers symmetry predominates, whilst in trees eurythmy prevails. In -considering the branches of a tree in relation to its trunk, we find -the same symmetry and eurythmy, though the direction be changed. We can -study these forms best in plants of the coal formation--the Sigillaria, -Stigmaria, Lepidodendra, and Calamites; and in ferns, fir-trees, -cedars, &c. - -In the palm tree we see most distinctly the working of the conflicting -forces of nature. The dynamic force of vitality drives the stem -upwards, and the static force of gravitation towards a common centre is -expressed in the beautifully-drooping curves of the leaves. Symmetry is -further to be observed in the lowest animals, in polyps, radiata, &c., -but never in higher species, in which it is not planimetrical (viz., -cannot be treated on a plane) but linear, none of them being perfectly -regular in any of the three dimensions of space. - -Man is altogether different from the products of the mineral or -vegetable kingdoms, which give us the prototypes of conventional art. -Man is not in all directions symmetrical in the strict sense of the -word. He has not two heads, two noses, or two mouths. The component -elements in man are different. His very nature revolts against a -planimetrical treatment. This was perfectly understood by the masters -of arabesque, who have always turned man half into a fish, a plant, -a serpent, a tendril, or some other form adapted for planimetrical -treatment. Eurythmy and _Proportion_ are the elements of higher organic -forms--to which must be added direction or _Action_, and finally -_Expression_. - -In most of the lower animals the vertebræ are horizontal, and -coincident with the moving direction of the whole creature. In man, on -the other hand, the vertebræ are vertical, in opposition to the moving -direction which is horizontal; so that the vertebræ and line of motion -are at right angles. - -In men, detached as they are from their horizontal basis, the -soil--carrying their static force with them, and able to change it -either from below, upwards, or from front to back--_direction_ is of -a complicated nature, and must be well studied, so as not to produce -incongruities. - -If a woman or man were painted with the most beautiful and expressive -face, but having it twisted round, so as to crown the spine, we should -turn from it with disgust, as anyone endowed with the sense of beauty -turns from acrobats, because the natural laws of gravitation and -symmetry would be violated. This illustration may serve to prove, that -there are laws in art with which we must make ourselves acquainted, -and that the mere 'right of taste,' in the general sense of the words, -cannot promote the understanding and appreciation of our artistic -productions. - -Next to direction we have to take into account _motion_. This element -is in animals and men produced by their inherent dynamic force, -counteracted by the body itself, which represents the static force, or -the '_vis inertiæ_,' chaining them to the centre of gravitation in the -earth. - -Motion again leads to _expression_ and _action_. - -_Expression_ is the effect of the conflicting static or dynamic -(passive or active) state of the mind, so far as this state is revealed -in the lineaments of the face. - -_Action_ is the effect of the same conflicting force so far as it is -expressed in the limbs and the position of the body. - -A third force, which is often used unconsciously, necessarily grows out -of these elements--the controlling or ruling element, or, as Vitruvius -has it, '_the principle of authority_.' This element points out the -preponderance of certain forms as the visible representatives of the -general principles which we have stated, bringing into the _variety_ -of details, harmony and _unity_. This controlling element stands to -the surrounding and united parts in the same relation as the key-note -to a harmonious melody. Without that key-note no harmony--without the -controlling element no beauty, were possible. - -Having proceeded step by step from the formation of matter in crystals -to man, we may set down the following as the five principal elements -necessary to beauty in art:-- - - 1. Symmetry. - 2. Eurythmy. - 3. Proportion. - 4. Direction or motion. - 5. Expression. - -a. Symmetry has already been amply treated. - -b. Eurythmy is either stereometric or planimetric. It is stereometric -in balls and in regular solid bodies, such as the tetrahedron, a figure -of four equal triangular faces, or the polyhedron, a figure with many -sides. These forms are symmetrical without any controlling element. -Such an element shows itself first in the ellipsoid--distinct from the -oval--in the prism, and the pyramid. Planimetric eurythmy preponderates -in snow-crystals, flowers, plants, trees, and the lowest animals. - -The controlling element shows itself in the grouping of the single -parts round a common centre, which is often distinguished by a contrast -in forms or colours. It is unconsciously expressed by a sign or mark. - -Ornamentation takes its origin in the effort to express, to designate, -or to mark out the controlling element. The ornamented object has -only then a meaning, when it expresses visibly the hidden idea of the -controlling element, say the idea of fastening or keeping together, -as in clasps, brooches, buckles; or the idea of equilibrium, as in -earrings. Such signs or marks were very early used, and are spread -all over our globe; they developed into the rough tombs in Phrygia, -Greece and Italy; took a higher form in Central America and Assyria; -became crystallised in the Pyramids; and attained the highest -perfection in the tombs of Mausolus, Augustus, and Hadrian. The mark -or sign is also used in games, as on race-courses, in the stadium, -the circus, or the amphitheatre. A more distinct expression is gained -when the mark or sign, as divine statue, altar, &c., is surrounded by -rhythmically-arranged circles or encompassing walls, as the visible -expression of the union of the many, or variety, for one religious -or ceremonial purpose. The mark or sign reflects, on the one hand, -the idea of harmony, whilst, on the other, the rhythmically-arranged -surroundings form an impressive total, heightening the force of the -controlling element. This law explains the awe, veneration, mysterious -feeling, and secret fear with which men at all times have looked upon -the central mark or sign, whether in the simple stone-circles of Abury, -Stonehenge, and Carnac, the rock-hewn temples of India, the temples -of Egypt, Greece, and Rome, or the synagogues and churches of our own -times. - -Next to the controlling element, we must take into consideration -the grouping of the whole object on a horizontal basis around a -vertical axis. This axis becomes the seat of the linear, symmetrical, -controlling element. It is especially marked by richly ornamented -reliefs or by gaudier colours, so pronounced that the other parts of -the ornamented object appear as mere accompaniments of the horizontal -and vertical lines. Remarkable in their incongruity, but often -unsurpassed in the application of this principle, are the tattooed -heads of savages, in which the linear central line is ornamented -symmetrically on both sides of the face--the prominent parts being -marked by spirals to make them appear still more prominent. - -c. Proportion, as an element of art, cannot work by itself, but must -be considered in relation to its parts and the controlling element. -Proportion consists of a basis, a middle piece, and a dominant. To -illustrate this, we have in plants and trees, the root (basis), the -stem or trunk (middle piece), and the top, crown or flower (dominant). - -The basis represents the cosmical element of gravitation by powerful -masses, simplicity of forms, and dark colouring. This law was -especially observed in the excellent decoration of the Roman houses -at Pompeii, and is still followed in our wainscoting. We try -unconsciously to express the static force from which the dynamic rises. - -The middle piece, growing out of the basis, is supported and -supporting; it unites the elements of the basis with the top or -dominant; it is the connecting link between these two extremes. The -basis stands in the same relation to the middle piece, as the latter to -the dominant. - -The dominant harmoniously reconciles the conflicting forces of striving -upwards, and being drawn downwards. Variations in these relations are -not only allowable, but form the very element of the artist's creative -originality--so long as he clearly marks the purpose of the three -elements. - -d. Direction, or motion, in its highest form is only to be found in -man. In fishes the axis, or seat of the controlling element, is not -fixed as in plants. If fishes pursue some point of attraction, they -shoot forward in a straight line, so that a conflict between the static -and dynamic forces is never visible in them, because the axes of these -two forces are always one and the same. This is entirely different with -birds, quadrupeds, and especially with men, who, to a great extent, are -masters of their motions; for will, as the force of their conscious -intellect, changes their static as well as their dynamic direction. - -Man is the symbol of earthly perfection. In him all laws and elements -of the universe are united. What is with inanimate nature a static -point of attraction, is with man _moral_; the dynamic force of -activity, is with him _intellect_. Animals also work, but their works -are in general the result of their instinct; whilst with man, though he -may also be ruled by unconscious impulses, intellect--self-conscious -intellect--is the mainspring of all his actions. These have a -reflecting mirror in the glance of his eyes, whilst the changing -and changeable effects of scorn, love, wrath, delight, happiness, -or despair are pictured in the mysteriously-woven lineaments of his -countenance. - -e. Expression, of intellectual and moral impressions, is most -concentrated in MAN. - - - - -CHAPTER II. - -ETHNOLOGY IN ITS BEARING ON ART. - - -Man is placed on this globe as a radius,--a detached radius. The -axis of his body is part of the diameter of the earth, and divides -him into symmetrical halves. A line, that passes at an equal -distance through the double organs, also divides the single ones -into two equally-arranged portions. We possess two eyes, to receive -the impression of light; two ears, to be touched simultaneously by -the waves of sound; two tubes are opened, to receive the refined, -imponderable bodies producing odour; the lips are grouped round a -marked central line to the chin. We have two shoulders, two arms, -two hands, two legs, two feet; both hands have the same number of -fingers, and both feet the same number of toes. On the other hand, the -parts, taken by themselves, break through all the laws of symmetrical -uniformity. The arms are longer than the trunk; the legs are longer -than the arms; hands end in unequally-subdivided fingers; feet in -similarly-treated toes. But notwithstanding this want of symmetry there -is perfect harmony in the relations of the parts to the whole, so that -man may be said to be the very master-piece of creation. In considering -the controlling linear elements, in the three grand groups into which -humanity may be best divided for a comprehensive study of art, we find -that the very fundamental facial lines differ. - - -I. - -We have first the Negro, the fossil, the _black_, or antediluvian man. -The eyes, nostrils, and lips are drawn downwards in melancholy lines. -He is cross-toothed (_prognathous_), triangular-headed, has flat feet, -long heels, an imperfect pelvis, but a very powerful digestive organ, -and a correspondingly enormous mouth. - -[Illustration] - -The Oceanic Negro is the best example of this group. He is slow of -temperament, unskilled, his mechanical ingenuity being that of a child; -he never goes beyond geometrical ornamentation; builds tumuli or -triangular wigwams; lives on what he finds by chance, and, at the best, -hunts or fishes. His reasoning faculty is very limited, his imagination -slow, but his perceptive faculties (the senses) are highly developed. -He is altogether incapable of rising from a fact to a principle. He -cannot create beauty, for he is indifferent to any ideal conception. -He possesses only from 75-83½ cubic inches of brain, his facial angle -being about 85½ degrees. This lowest group of mankind branches off into -different types. The general features of the group have neither changed -nor improved. The Negro is still the woolly-headed, animal-faced being, -represented on the tombs of the Pharaohs, because his bodily structure, -his facial lines have not altered during thousands of years. In -studying the artistic products, the customs and manners of this group, -we can picture to ourselves the state in which Asiatics and Europeans -must have lived during the oldest stone period. The Negroes use the -same kind of flint instruments, manufacture the same crude kind of -pottery, adorn their clubs, paddles, and the cross-beams of their huts -with the same rope and serpent-like entangled windings and twistings, -that are found in various parts of the globe of pre-historic times. The -ruling lines of the face and head of the Negro are reflected in his -triangular or mound-like architectural constructions. - - -II. - -[Illustration] - -Next we have the Turanian (from _tura_, 'swiftness of a horse'), -the Mongol, the square or short-headed (_brachikephalous_), the -traditionary, the _yellow_ man. His face is flat, his nose deeply -sunken between his prominent cheeks; his reasoning faculty is -developed only to a certain degree. He has small, oblique eyes, the -lines being turned upwards, expressing cunning and jocularity. His -mouth is less powerful than that of the negro. He has broad shoulders, -an expansive chest, thin and small bow legs, as if formed to use those -of horses instead of his own; he is an excellent rider, but a slow -though steady walker. He looks on nature with a nomadic shepherd's eye, -and not with that of a settled artist. He excels in technical ability, -has great powers of imitation, can produce geometrical ornamentation -of the most complicated and ingenious character, and a realistic -imitation of flowers, butterflies, and birds, but has no sense for -perspective and no talent for shading. He is incapable of drawing the -human form. Sculpture of a higher kind is unknown to him, though he can -execute perfectly marvellous carvings, which, though quaint in design -and composition, are wanting in proportion and expression. Faithful -to his nomadic traditions, and the lines of his head and face, his -architectural constructions take an according form. Like his facial -lines, the roofs of his houses are twisted upwards. - -The amount of brain in the Turanian averages 83½ cubic inches, and his -facial angle is 87½ degrees. - - -III. - -[Illustration] - -Finally we have the Aryan, the long or oval-headed man -(_dolichokephalous_), the historical, the _white_ man, the crowning -product of the cosmical forces of nature. His facial lines are composed -of the two conflicting elements, the horizontal and the vertical line, -and are framed in by an oval. His amount of brain is on an average 92 -cubic inches, and his facial angle 90 degrees. His development is not -limited. This group of mankind, though divided into many different -types (races or nations), which have arisen from an intermixture with -the other two groups, or through the influences of climate, food, and -the aspect of nature, stands at the highest point of civilisation. As -the lines of his face are admirably counterbalanced, and his body is a -master-piece of regularity and proportion, he has tried to establish -a perfect balance between the conflicting forces in his moral and -intellectual nature. To him exclusively we owe art in its highest -sense. Once he stood on the same level with the primitive black savage, -then he advanced to the ingenuity of the yellow man, and left both -far behind him in his gradual but always progressive development. He -surpasses the other two groups of humanity, not only in technical -skill, but especially in inventive and reasoning power, critical -discernment, and purity of artistic taste. The white man alone, has -produced idealised master-pieces in sculpture and painting. - -The white man in his architecture uses either the horizontal or the -vertical line, or both; he takes the triangular building of the negro -and places it on the square tent of the yellow man, making his house -as perfect as possible; he goes further, and, in accordance with -his powerfully-arched brow, over-arches not only rivers and chasms, -but builds his magnificent cupolas and pointed arches, the acme of -architectural forms. - -Ethnology then serves us as a foundation for the study of art in its -different phases. - -Conforming to the general tendency of modern science, we have tried to -express the cause of the artistic development of the three groups of -humanity by figures; we have measured the seat and instrument of our -intellectual faculty, and have thus tried to leave the sphere of mere -conjecture, or unfounded opinion, in order to place the phenomena of -art-history on a firm basis. Though art, undoubtedly, belongs 'to the -magic circle of the imagination, and the inner powers of the mind,' -those powers are dependent on our very bodily construction, the amount -of brain and the facial angle. We do not deal in mere hypothesis, but -submit to our readers a complete theory borne out by facts. - -In considering the frontispiece of our manual, representing the 'TREE -OF ART,' we can visibly trace the slow and gradual development of the -white man. The negro fixes our attention only as savage; the yellow -man has a line of his own, and has remained stationary in his artistic -development; the white man has passed through the savage stages, and -by his own exertions, undergoing various phases of rise and decline -(the real signs of historical vitality), has steadily progressed till -he began to attempt, and to succeed in bringing about, 'a harmonious -connection between the representation of nature and the expression of -awakened emotion, and a mysterious analogy between the emotions of his -mind and the phenomena perceived by his senses.' - -As all phenomena must take place in _space_ and _time_ (the two -fundamental forms of all existence), the products of art must also have -been executed under these two conditions, and can therefore be treated -_historically_. - -Space is the expansion and extension of the forces of nature into the -infinite. Time is the limitation of this activity. Without space no -object could arrive at completion. Without time the subject would be -eternal. These are the two counteracting elements. The one, space, -is positive--the other, time, negative. Time is either relative or -absolute. If relative, it can be measured by an ascertained succession -of events. If absolute, it becomes measurable by years. In both we -can trace a gradual and successive development of artistic forms. -In general, time relative, with its succession of products, is more -reliable than time labelled with voluntary and more than doubtful -dates. For instance, we cannot measure the periods of the formation -of the earth's crust by years, and still we are perfectly convinced -that the _tertiary_ formation could not have taken place before the -_primary_; thus we are justified in assuming that the iron period must -have succeeded the stone or bronze period; bronze instruments never -being found with iron handles, whilst iron blades have ornamented -wooden or bronze handles. Man naturally scarcely ever uses the worse -material for a practical purpose when he has once found a better one; -but he will use the softer material as a means of ornamentation. - -That we have plenty of 'survivals' in art, as well as in nature, -does not in any way militate against the strict logic of facts. The -lowest forms of animals have mostly survived (like the lowest forms -of ornamentation), yet no one can doubt or deny the gradual and -systematic development of the vegetable and animal kingdoms. If we find -no fragments of pottery in Australia, New Zealand, or the Polynesian -islands, we cannot assume that a grand and powerful civilisation has -perished there, leaving no traces behind. In finding different kinds of -pottery, gradually improving even in the quality of the material--the -clay being first unwashed, then mixed with grains of quartz and -felspar, next carefully washed, then sun-baked, then fire-baked; -first hand and then wheel turned, and at last glazed, unornamented -or ornamented--we cannot assume that the order was inverted, and -that man first ornamented glazed pottery, which he turned out on the -wheel, and then went back to unwashed clay and hand-made pottery. The -'degeneration theory' has exploded as entirely as the geocentric and -anthropocentric theories have vanished. We know that man, like flowers, -trees, rocks and animals, is the product of the combined forces of -nature and the influences of climate and food, and that his religious, -social, and political conditions are closely reflected in his art. As -little as our globe is the centre of the universe, or man the centre of -creation, so little did art or science spring at once perfectly armed, -provided with spear and shield, from Jupiter's head like blue-eyed -Athene. In a certain sense art and science are both of divine origin, -but only so far as the originating and creative power is concerned, -which, once set in motion, had to grow and to develop according to -definite and immutable laws. To trace this development step by step in -general outlines, from time relative to the mythical and traditional -periods, and thence to the age of history, is the aim of our manual. In -generalising thus, and separating the special from the universal, we -are enabled to embrace at once with greater clearness a wider range of -knowledge, and to give to the treatment of art-history a more elevated -and useful character. By a suppression of details, the great periods -and features of a common development are rendered more intelligible, -and our reasoning faculty is enabled to grasp that which might -otherwise escape our limited powers of comprehension. - - - - -CHAPTER III. - -PRE-HISTORIC AND SAVAGE ART. - - -Art, like nature, is its own interpreter. A well-finished pattern has -not preceded a more simple one; circular ornamentations are of a later -date than ornamentations with straight lines. The cave-habitation -must have been in use before the construction of independent temples. -Art must have had a beginning like language; for it is a language--a -language in forms, speaking to our eyes. If what the Arabs say is true, -that the best description is that in which the ear is transformed into -an eye, the best picture will be one that transforms our eyes into -ears. Art speaks through light, as language through sounds. We have -tried to discover by means of philology--which in modern times has -become a science--a more or less close relationship between idioms and -idioms; in the same way we try to trace some general primitive types -from which we may deduce the innumerable works of art. - -In times long by-gone we find traces of man's inventive and decorative -force. The products of that force even in pre-historic ages widely -differ in their degrees of workmanship. There are more or less finished -hatchets, chisels, knives, arrow-heads, paal-stabs, celts and armlets. -The ornamentation, from mere varying straight lines, goes over into -spiral forms of different direction and combination. We have therefore -no difficulty in classifying the products of pre-historic art in the -following way:-- - - _a._ The Palæolithic, or old stone age. - _b._ The Neolithic, or new stone age. - _c._ The Bronze age, and - _d._ The Iron age. - -The first two subdivisions belong to savage life, the third to the -mythical or traditionary, and the fourth to the historical periods. - -During the old stone age we have scarcely any traces of ornamentation; -during the new stone age we find some attempts at geometrical lines, -and some sketches of animals on ivory blades; during the bronze age we -have winding and twisting patterns of excellent geometrical design; -and, finally, during the iron age, animals and even human forms are -used as means of ornamentation. - -During the pre-historic period of man's artistic development we find a -peculiar similarity between his dwellings and his tombs. The mountain -cavern, and the hut constructed of beams and boughs, covered with -skins, were undoubtedly men's first stately palaces. The very oldest -traditions bear out this statement. The earliest inhabitants of -Greece dwelt in mountain caverns. The people of Siberia, anterior to -the Samoyedes, lived, according to Erman, in subterranean caves. The -Kyklops of Homer are but nomads, residing in mountain caverns. Of the -Hittites, a tribe in Canaan in the times of Abraham, it is recorded -that they buried their dead in caves. But it is an incontestable fact -that the burial-places resembled the dwellings of the pre-historic -man. Crypts, catacombs, and rock-hewn temples may be set down as -having originated from man's first mountain home. The tombs of the -Tartars in Kasan resemble their houses on a small scale. A Circassian -tomb resembles a Circassian cottage. The tombs of the Karaite Jews in -the valley of Jehoshaphat, are like their houses. Laplanders live in -caves. The aborigines of Germany and France, the contemporaries of the -mammoth, rhinoceros, auerochs and elk, dwelt in caves, as their bones -are found mingled with those of these now extinct animals, together -with various implements, such as adzes, flint arrows, stone knives, and -even, as in the cave at Perigord on the borders of the Dordogne, works -of art of great artistic power. Jordanes, in his 'De Rebus Geticis,' -mentions people in Sweden (Scania) living like wild animals in caves, -cut out in the rocks. But the nomad savage could find such dwellings -only where there were mountains. If he wandered out of such a district -into the plains, and wanted to shelter himself from the inclemency of -the weather, he had to collect blocks of stone, and to form with them -artificial caves. In this manner cromlechs, Dös, Dyss or dolmens, and -gallery chambers arose, in which the long, narrow gallery corresponds -to the confined entrance of the mountain-cave, and the chamber to the -cavern. - -By degrees man began to construct detached houses for himself, and -at last temples for his god or gods. No traces of temples are found -in pre-historic times, except in the Western hemisphere. The Stiens -of Cambodia, in the central parts of Cochin-China, have no temples. -From the southern promontory of Africa to far beyond the banks of the -Zambesi no temples are found. The pastoral and agricultural people -of Madagascar have no temples, though they have huts and houses, -ornamented pottery, and are to a certain degree acquainted with -textile art. Before man constructs a temple he constructs a house, -to protect himself, his herds, and family from wild animals, but -above all from his still more dreaded fellow-creature, in whom he -sees a dangerous rival. This propensity serves to explain the origin -of lake-dwellings--the most ancient proofs of man's constructing -capacity, and of his talent to unite for a certain purpose, and to -enclose a given space. Herodotus already tells us of a settlement on -Lake Prasias, the modern Tachyno (in Rumelia, European Turkey), where -men lived on platforms, supported by tall piles. Abulfeda, the Syrian -geographer (b. 1273; d. 1313), speaks of Christian fishermen living in -wooden huts, built on piles in one of the Apamean lakes on the Orontes -(in Asia). The Papuans of New Guinea still live in such pile-dwellings, -the floors of which are supported by rudely-carved human figures, an -attempt at telamons. These are 'survivals,' but the lake-dwellings in -Italy and Switzerland belong to pre-historic times. In tracing their -different modes of construction, we find three periods of a progressive -architectural development recorded. - -We have pile-dwellings of the most primitive construction. Rough piles -were used, pointed with the aid of fire or with stone hatchets, later -with bronze, and finally with iron tools. They were placed either close -together or in pairs, or wide apart--generally in regular order. The -heads of the piles were brought to a level above the water to receive -the beams of the platform, which were fastened down with wooden pins. -Later, as an improvement, mortices were cut in the tops of the vertical -piles to receive the cross-beams. - -Other constructions, especially those near Nidau (niedere Au, lower -meadow), are built on a foundation artificially strengthened with -stones, which is, undoubtedly, an improvement on the former method. - -Experience taught the pre-historic architects that the piles were -not quite safe, and ought to have some support against the turbulent -risings of the lake. This produced the still more improved fascine -constructions, which certainly gave still greater strength to the -dwelling. The platform did not rest on mere piles but on artificial -foundations, built up from the bottom with horizontal layers of sticks -or small branches of trees, the vertical piles serving as connecting -links to the whole construction. - -Cranoges, or wooden islands, are chiefly found in Ireland and Scotland. -They differ from the fascine constructions in that they frequently were -built on natural islands, or on shallows approaching to this character. -The huts built upon these pile-constructions were rectangular; some may -have been round, like the huts of savages, in imitation of mole-hills, -the prototypes of the numerous mounds strewn all over the globe. The -huts contained an artificial hearth, made of three or four slabs of -stone. - -That the inhabitants of the lake-dwellings were acquainted with -textile art, is proved by the discovery of an innumerable quantity of -clay-weights for weaving purposes, and by pieces of burnt woven flax. -The crude pottery, tools and wooden pegs, fibres twisted into ropes, -remains of different cereals, fruits, and domestic animals found in -these settlements, clearly prove that a certain kind of family life -must have existed. At all events, the inhabitants must have reached a -higher degree of civilisation than some of the South-Sea Islanders of -our century, who, on receiving some iron nails, planted them, in the -expectation of reaping a rich crop of this valuable vegetable. - -We see that in pre-historic times art was already practised, not only -for a merely utilitarian but also for an ornamental and artistic -purpose. - -This may be said, in a much higher sense, of the pre-historic -art-remains in the Western hemisphere. Art had there a threefold -development, corresponding to the three groups of humanity. We find the -mounds of the Negro; the pottery of the yellow man, with its quaint -ornamentation; and the remarkable temples, fortresses, viaducts, and -aqueducts of the Aryan group. We possess in our museums abundant -specimens of the works of these three groups, as also of their singular -hieroglyphic writings, resembling the first attempts of the Chinese -and Egyptians to represent ideas in forms. Imagination with savages -supplies the form; the mere outlines therefore suffice. The horse drawn -in this way (_a_) is a real horse; (_b_) this forms a real goose; (_c_) -this is the sun; and (_d_) this a real man. It is a kind of pictorial -writing or ideography, to be seen for miles and miles hewn in rocks at -Massaya, and practised by humanity at large, as by our own children, in -the first stage of awakening consciousness. - -[Illustration] - -We find not only ethnological, but also philological and artistic -traces of the fact, that at an unknown pre-historic period, the Western -hemisphere must have been in close connection with the Eastern. The -name of the supreme Divinity, Dyaus, {Theos}, Deus, is in the far West -_Teotl_. - -Art in the _North_ of the Western hemisphere is primitive, kyklopean -walls and sepulchral mounds being the principal remains. - -In the _Centre_ of the Continent, art bears all the traces of a -gradually-developed progress. It almost reached the forms of Egypt, -but stopped half way. By some means Atalanta was separated from the -East, and the pyramids, temples and palaces of central America remained -in the same relation to the pyramids, temples and palaces of Egypt as -the _tapir_ to the elephant; the _alligator_ to the crocodile; and the -_llama_ to the camel. - -The West possessed a knowledge of astronomy analogous to that of the -Chinese, and their mode of ornamentation in excellent stucco reached -a high degree of technical and even pictorial skill. They went so far -as to represent scenes of an historical character with some degree -of dramatic power; as the stucco of the rock-hewn temple of Mitla in -Mexico proves. Their ornamentation is irregular and confused, like -their wild vegetation, in which creepers predominate. - -Some figures are striking in their resemblance to Egyptian forms. - -A sculptured divinity of granite, 3½ feet high, found near a -finely-built pyramid not far from Guatusco or Huatusco, is excellently -worked and finished in a simple style. Still more curious is a small -statue executed in lava, with a head-dress resembling those of Isis, -the Sphinx, the capitals of the temple of Denderah, or at a later -period those of Antinous. Even the position of the feet reminds us of -the sphinx, and proves the absence of a knowledge of proportion. - -In South America, in the regions of Lake Titicaca in Peru, lying at an -elevation of 13,000 feet above the level of the sea, i.e. about four -times as high as Snowdon, we have proofs of a very high civilisation. -Artificially-constructed causeways lead over the surrounding marshes to -the sacred town of Cuzco, the capital and central spot of the empire -of the fabulous yet real Incas. Of those times we have a garden of the -Incas, in the warmest and most sheltered part of the island, 'with its -baths, and its fountains still flowing with silvery sheen and murmur.' -Not far from Titicaca is the island of Coati, sacred to the moon. -Here stood the famous palace of the Virgins of the Sun (reminding us -of the Vestals instituted by one of the Roman rulers), flanked by two -shrines dedicated to the sun and moon. These are the best-preserved -specimens of American pre-historic architecture. Round Lake Umayo, on a -peninsula, we find a remarkable group of ancient square burial towers, -known as the Chulpas of Silustani. - -Cuzco was the Rome of the south of the Western hemisphere. The town was -traversed by four high-roads in the direction of the four points of the -compass. It was divided into an upper (_Hanau_) and a lower (_Hurin_) -town. Grouped around the central square in the form of an oval were -twelve subdivisions (_Carrios_). Here stood the great palace, one mile -in length and a quarter of a mile broad; the _Yachahuasi_ (_Huasi_, -houses) dedicated to the instruction of the youth; the _Galpones_, -edifices in which festivals were held; the convent of the Virgins of -the Sun, the _Corichanca_ or Palace of Gold, and the temple dedicated -to the sun, surrounded by chapels dedicated to the moon, the stars, -and to thunder and lightning. Here also stood the eighth wonder of the -world--the great fortress _Sacsahuaman_; the entrances with slanting -jambs, and a large plinth, constructed like inverted stairs, sometimes -in stone, sometimes in excellent stucco, either with or without -ornament. The three lines of massive walls round the town, forming -the defence, were constructed 'en tenaille,' the entering angles all -being ninety degrees; the very best European fortifications, planned -by Vauban or Moltke, could not surpass the terrace-like arrangement -of these three lines of defence. The polygonal blocks, of which the -walls are constructed, are of blue limestone, from eight to ten feet -in length, half as much in width and depth, and weigh from fifteen -to twenty tons each. The first wall has an average height of about -twenty-five feet, the second eighteen feet, and the third fourteen -feet. Total elevation of walls, fifty-seven feet. - -However cursorily we have touched upon art as it developed in the -Western hemisphere, the reader must be impressed by two facts. (1) That -there are analogies between East and West which are too striking to be -attributed to mere chance; and (2) that those who built the edifices -of Uxmal, Palenque, Copan, Chichen, Itza, and Cuzco must have been far -beyond a mere nomadic state. They had palaces, temples, and therefore -a kind of social organisation and religion. Their religion must have -been of a low and cruel character, judging from the representations -of their divinities, and from their using detached limbs of the human -body as arabesques; though we can trace in their calendar, as in their -conceptions of the personified powers of nature, Eastern influences, -connecting the pre-historic West with the historic East. Whilst the -Eastern world used incense at its religious ceremonies, the West used -tobacco smoke. In both hemispheres some mysterious power was attributed -to animals. The helmets of all nations took their origin in this common -belief. Eagles, vultures, wolves, tigers, lions, dragons and serpents -are used to adorn the fighter or to charm his weapons. The custom of -wearing masks and helmets or head-dresses of some terrifying form, -exaggerating the size of the head, is of purely barbarous origin. In -the remains of ancient Mexico, Peru, and the South Sea Islands we -find a variety of carved masks; some resembling human faces, adorned -with false hair, beards and eyebrows; others representing the heads -of birds. They are generally painted, often ornamented with pieces of -foliaceous mica to make them glitter, or with turquoises and other -precious stones. - -That the pre-historic man, whether of the East or the farthest West, -had some sort of civilisation may be best studied in his keramic -products. Earthenware vessels, pots, jugs, vases, urns, and amphoræ are -as interesting to the art-historian as fossil plants and animals to the -paleontologist, or the different strata of the earth's crust to the -geologist. - -Pottery is one of the most reliable historical documents for fixing the -degree of civilisation of a nation. Fossil pottery very much resembles -antediluvian animals--it is without shape and form. Shells, leaves -and fruits suggested it. By degrees gourds and eggs gave man better -patterns. At a certain period it must have been the fashion in Egypt, -Etruria, Greece, China, Mexico and Peru to use animal and human forms -for vases, bottles, jugs and goblets, whilst horns, skulls and boots -are found amongst Teutons and some savage tribes. The Teutons hoped to -drink sweet honey out of the skulls of their slain enemies in Walhalla. -We cannot wonder that so amiable a creed should have engendered quaint -drinking vessels. We see in our own times plates and dishes adorned -with frogs and lizards, which indisputably prove that there are -pre-historic 'survivals.' From Kyprus we have, in the Imperial Cabinet -of Antiquities at Vienna, an urn with a human face, which is very -much like those found in Mexico, of which the South Kensington Museum -and the Christy collection of the British Museum possess excellent -specimens. - -The wild and fantastic mode of ornamentation in the Western hemisphere, -in pre-historic times, is entirely due to the aspect of nature. Man -seems to have received patterns from India, Egypt and Greece, and -worked them out by reflecting the impressions of an exuberant nature. -Flowers, feathers, pearls, trinkets, hieroglyphs, animals, human -bodies--all are mingled together in endless confusion. Here and there a -symmetrical echo of times long by-gone can be traced. Though, however, -the Western artists of pre-historic times sometimes attained symmetry, -they continually sin against eurythmy. Of proportion and action they -have no conception. They have a style, but a style of their own, devoid -of all those requisites which elevate a product to artistic beauty. - - - - -CHAPTER IV. - -CHINESE ART. - - -The Chinese undoubtedly reached a high degree of culture earlier than -all the historical nations, and still they are in a state of civilised -infancy. They possess reliable historical records referring to periods -when branches of the Aryan group of humanity were still nomads. They -knew that our globe is flattened at the poles, at a time when we -thought it to be a square supported by pillars; they were acquainted -with the properties of the magnet-needle; worked metal; cultivated -the mulberry-tree, systematically fed the silk-worm with its leaves, -weaving its product into the very best silk. In pottery they have -attained the greatest perfection so far as the material is concerned. -In engineering they were not less clever. They have aqueducts, executed -with great daring; innumerable bridges span their rivers; they drained -and irrigated the land at a time when other people assumed a universal -deluge; and yet they remained babies in thoughts and customs, whilst -they grew older and older in age. They have all the manners of -precocious children with prematurely aged faces. This phenomenon can -be explained in figures. There are 400,000,000 of Chinese, nearly all -Turanians. Taking an equal number of Aryans, we shall find that they -are not less than 3,400,000,000 cubic inches short of brain, of which -each inch represents a certain amount of intellectual force. This -deficiency in 'brain-force' shows itself in their totally different -development, and the stationary character of their institutions. They -ingeniously _play_ in science, art, politics, and religion. 4,500 years -ago they reached a high degree of civilisation, and they remained -stationary in their civilised childhood, which they preserve with a -pious veneration. To look back, to believe that the past was better -than the present, has become the static law of China, and has checked -every progress. Their language is agglutinative, only one degree -higher than the savage monosyllabic, and forms a link between this -and the flexible languages. The 450 monosyllables are used to form -1,230 word-sounds, out of which they compose from 40,000 to 60,000 -compounds. They cannot pronounce certain consonants, resembling in this -some badly-taught European children. They say: 'Yoo-lo-pa' instead of -Europe; 'Ya-me-li-ka' instead of America; 'Ma-li-ya' instead of Maria; -'cu-lu-su' instead of crux; 'Ki-li-tu-su' for Christus. Their mode of -writing has developed from pictorial signs. They preserved these; and, -although arbitrary characters have supplanted picture-writing, or -hieroglyphs, they still retain the clumsiness of this form, and have -for every word a special sign. - -Notwithstanding these drawbacks they possess an encyclopædia in 5,000 -volumes, and a collection of works of fiction amounting to 180,000 -volumes. They can boast of a Socrates in Confucius, of a Plato in -Mem-tsu, and of a Xenophon in Tsem-tsu. - -Five is with them a holy number: they had five emperors during their -Golden Age; there are five great principles on which they base the -possibility of a regulated social existence, viz. humanity, justice, -conformity, uprightness, and sincerity. They have five holy books: the -Shoo-King (political precepts); the Y-King (a philosophy of emanations -based on figures); the Shi-King (a collection of didactical odes and -songs about 3,000 years old); the Li-King (a record of ceremonial -customs and social manners); and the Yo-King (a book on music, -regulating harmony on the most discordant principles). They have five -domestic principles, five elements, five primitive colours, five -seasons of the year, five ruling spirits, five planets, five points -of the compass, five sorts of earth, five different precious stones, -five degrees of punishment, five different kinds of dresses; and their -whole principle of ornamentation is based on five points [Illustration: -(five points forming a rectangle with one point in the middle)]. By -uniting these five points they produce that ingenious system for the -conventional treatment of flowers and animals, which has been divided -by Owen Jones into-- - - _a._ The continuous stem system; - _b._ The united fragmentary system; and - _c._ The interspersed fragmentary system. - -In these three systems they observe the natural laws of radiation and -tangential curvature. - -But in all their works of art appears the spectre of childishness, with -wrinkles in its withered face. Their patterns in textile art are such -as some people delight in for the sake of their quaint originality. -They altogether neglect the laws of ornamentation; and we never know -whether in ornamenting a vase they did not intend to dress a Chinese -lady for a tea party, or whether in dressing a high-standing mandarin, -or a lady in stiff brocade, they did not intend to ornament one of -their peculiarly-shaped tea-pots. In fact their vases are ladies in -brocade dresses, whilst their gentlemen and ladies look like ambulatory -vases. We often see on a lady, 'doves as big as bustards, cooing; -flowers and trees growing on plates and vases upside down, and inside -out.' We see a mandarin strutting about, adorned with an embroidered -tree with fifty different foliages. One screen is decorated with fishes -with feathers, another with birds with fins, or monstrous dragons creep -on the ground or fly in the air. Everything in art is done as it ought -not to be done. It is as if some merry and mischievous hobgoblin had -instructed the Chinese to make up a kind of artistic patchwork out of -all the odds and ends of ornamental fancies, distorted figures, and -incomprehensible combinations. - -Their towns look like large encampments of nomad hordes, ready at -a moment's notice to take up their tents and run away. Though they -have constructed a huge wall, which is 25 feet thick at the base, -diminishing to 15 at the platform, provided at distances of 100 yards -with towers about 40 feet square at the base, diminishing to 30 at the -top, and about 37-48 feet in height; though they have carried this over -the ridges of lofty hills (one of them 5,000 feet above the level of -the sea), and led it through the deepest valleys, or upon arches over -rivers--their architecture is still in its very infancy. It is a kind -of toy-architecture. The walls of their houses may be pulled down, and -the houses still remain standing. For architecture with the Chinese -is in no way an organic total; it is not even a chemically-united -composition; but a mechanically-joined something, without any ruling -and connecting idea. Contrary to all rules of good architecture, they -express in their constructions the principle of the separation and -independence of the active elements of the building, instead of their -union and harmony. It is variety without unity. Their walls are mere -screens in bricks or wood, mere frameworks for tapestry. The wall -with them does not support; it appears movable and totally distinct -from the roof. The scaffolding which supports the horizontal, as also -the vertical enclosures, belongs more to textile than to tectonic art -The Turanian is still addicted to fascine work, like the pre-historic -lake-dweller, or our contemporary aboriginal New Zealander. The -divisions in the interior of the house are movable; either consisting -of real carpets, lattice-work, wooden-jointed leaves, or boards, -ornamented to imitate carpets or movable screens. Imitations of -flowered woven-stuffs, lacquered panels with impossible perspectives, -bamboo tress-work, with protruding knobs, carved and turned into -gaping and grinning fantastic monsters, are also among the principal -characteristics of Chinese architectural ornamentation. Chinese -trellis-work has a fairy-like appearance. The patterns are infinitely -varied, either closely fitting or perforated, dividing and enclosing -spaces, surrounding terraces as railings, running up the staircases, or -forming large borders between column and column. - -The trellis-work of the Chinese may be divided into three classes:-- - -1. The bamboo _wicker_-work, a close imitation of textile fabrics; in -fact, woven wood-work. - -2. The _lattice_-work, a kind of transition or metamorphic work between -trellis and cross-barred work. The patterns are of a grosser kind. - -3. The _mixed_-work, a combination of the two classes. - -The first is generally used in ornamenting the interior of the -basements of the houses. The natural bright yellow tint of the bamboo -is either left, or it is lacquered in variegated colours to heighten -the effect of the patterns. - -The lattice-work is used for door and window-frames. In the latter case -the holes are filled up with transparent shells, coloured paper, or -painted glass, which has been in use since 3000 B.C. - -The mixed-work runs along the walls, forming a frieze of gilt metal -or alabaster. The last-named material is employed in summer-houses -as a finish to the outer space, connecting bright red or light blue -columns. When thus used the effect is undoubtedly charming. The roofs -are tinted dark green, an unconscious reminiscence of by-gone times, -when they were made of the leafy branches of trees or the broad foliage -of plants. The dark azure of heaven shining through the perforated -trellis-work, contrasting with the white marble of the substructure and -the red columns, forms a combination both striking and agreeable. The -upper parts of a building appear to swim in the air. - -The brick walls of the Chinese are bare of stucco; the void -predominating. They use the walls either as enclosures for court-yards, -as isolated protecting walls before the entrances of houses--reminding -us of the gates of India or the propylæa of Egypt--as substructures, -or as enclosures and partitions for dwelling-places. All these -walls are constructed of air-dried, fire-baked, or glazed tiles and -bricks. The latter are only used for temples or imperial buildings. -Whilst we possess a Board of Public Works that unfortunately has -no administrative power, and cannot prevent our thoroughfares -from being constructed according to the principles of a most -inveterate symmetrophobia (hatred of all order, shape, style, and -homo-geneousness), the law in China goes so far as to regulate even -the use of building material, not according to any esthetical rule, -but pandering merely to rank and class interest. White marble may only -be used for imperial substructures, the enclosure of imperial courts, -and in the construction of imperial bridges, and must never be used -as wall-decoration. Their cement for coating walls is like ours; the -stucco flat coloured, and the colours mixed with the plaster before -laying on. According to his station in the State, the owner of a house -may surround it with a wall of clay or lime, or with one of air-dried -or fire-baked bricks. Only the walls of princes may have stone plinths. -The encircling walls of imperial palaces have a roof of bright yellow, -and light-green glazed tiles. The Tshao-Pings, or protecting walls, -placed before the entrance doors of houses, like screens before our -fire-places, have large protruding plinths. They differ in colour -according to the rank of the owner. Generally they are white, with -painted ornamentation. Before the houses or palaces of princes the -colours are red with gold, and the covering green or yellow. Before -_Miaos_, temples of honour, they are nearly always of bright yellow. -The outer walls are mostly white, decorated with incrusted landscapes -or other conventional decorations. The inner walls are red and richly -ornamented with gold; they have a kind of frieze ornamented with -trellis-work, so as apparently to detach the support from the supported -roof. In the houses of the higher classes the walls are decorated with -damask, and in those of the commoners with paper-hangings, which latter -we have adopted. Drapery is also freely used, hanging down and serving -to divide the interior spaces of the houses. Doors and windows are -still formed of curtains, as in the primitive times of civilisation in -Assyria, India, and Babylon. - -We are all acquainted with the excellence of Chinese silk-weaving, -interspersed with golden threads, as also with the brightness and -originality of some of their patterns, whenever they keep to an -imitation of nature in their floral forms. They are generally, -however, too realistic, the material not unfrequently appearing like a -botanist's herbarium, or like a collection of butterflies or stuffed -birds. Their embroidery is not less old than their silk-weaving. As -early as 2205 B.C. in their statistical records (numbering about 4,768 -volumes) gold, silver, copper, ivory, precious stones--_five sorts of -pigments_ of mineral extraction--silk, hemp, cotton, weavings of these -materials, and the feathers of all sorts of birds are mentioned. The -woven stuffs are of one colour. Silk is either red, black, white, or -yellowish, weaving in colours not being known. The frequent mention -made of birds' feathers may serve as a proof that they were used for -embroidery, which in primitive times was more an 'opus plumarium' than -embroidery proper, which is the forerunner of the art of painting. -Feather crowns, kilts, and dresses are still in use amongst the savages -of our own times. The colours are given by nature, and suit the -grotesque taste of the undisciplined mind by their bright variegations -and incongruities. - -The oldest Chinese embroidery in colours was perfectly plastic. The -plants, flowers, animals, and even figures, formed a polychromatic -relief on the flat surface of the stuff. This style is still -fashionable in China, though, instead of feathers, artificially -coloured threads are used, always so as to make the objects appear -raised from the surface. Even at present life-size figures in relief, -or whole scenes, are executed with the needle in brightly-coloured -silk threads. We are here involuntarily reminded of the reliefs of -Nineveh, and we may assume that they are nothing but a transformation -of embroidery into stone or alabaster. - -The dresses, furniture, saddles, tea-pots, shoes and boots, jackets, -covers, weapons, doors, and windows of the Chinese are all -ornamented with patterns which have had their origin in this kind of -relief-embroidery, traces of which are found even in their lacquered -and keramic products. - -The roofs of their houses are curved and drawn up like their features; -they are copies of lids of baskets, tea-caddies, urns, or of caps and -hats. The protruding parts are richly ornamented with dragons. The -dragon with the Chinese is the prototype out of which man developed; -the dragon is therefore the symbol of the imperial power. - -Whilst the Chinese are altogether deficient in painting, because they -have no idea of perspective or shading, they certainly excel in the -technical treatment of keramic works of art, especially in the paste, -which they make of kaolin, a decomposed feldspathic granite. The forms -of their genuine pottery are most primitive in outline; dishes, cups, -plates, and bowls are cylindrically shaped, as are their bottles and -jars. Our South Kensington Museum abounds in specimens illustrating -this. - -Sharp naturalism and an exact reproduction of the forms of nature, -without any skill in the conventional treatment of flowers, creepers, -leaves, stems, fruits, and animals, prevail in all Chinese and Japanese -works. The artist, if he intends to work in the Chinese style, must -divest himself of all considerations for the higher esthetical -principles of art; he must stoop to the tastes and delights of -children, must study thoroughly their every-day customs and manners, -enter into their mode of thinking, try to make the quaint quainter, -and the grotesque still more grotesque. A big sun with thick rays in a -corner to the right; some sharply-drawn trees in the middle; a bridge -up in the clouds with a dog running over it; some children with large -heads playing to the left; a bright stream marked with rough waves, -through which fishes are peeping; the whole excellently finished so -far as the lacquered work goes--and a Chinese tray is complete. The -coloured enamel on keramic works, and their lacquered or varnished -ware, notwithstanding their unimaginative naturalism and monstrously -fantastic delineation, surpass anything we are capable of producing in -the West of Europe. Their magnificent folding-screens, trays, tubs, -wash-hand basins, toilet-cases, work-tables, perfume-cases, frames for -looking-glasses; their jewel-tables--full of little drawers, secret -nooks and corners, puzzling openings, and hidden shuttings--are so -many additional proofs of their childish nature. They use the fret, -which they have in common with the Mexicans, Peruvians, and Greeks. -Whilst, however, the latter arrived at a continuous system of fret -ornamentation, the Chinese still use it mostly fragmentarily, either -one link after the other, or one above the other, without forming a -continuous ornament. - -We see in the Chinese one of the most interesting phenomena in -the history of mankind, whether we look upon them from a social, -religious, or artistic point of view. They govern their State on -paternal principle, and on the grand rule, 'Do to another what you -would he should do unto you, and do not unto another what you would -not should be done unto you. Thou only needest this law alone; it is -the foundation of all the rest' (Confucius in the sixth century B.C.), -and yet they have made no progress in sciences and arts. The paternal -government and home-rule check every thought. A moral principle of -the very highest meaning has, as with many of us, worked badly. They -have done unto others what others have done unto them. They cheated -because they were cheated; they told falsehoods because they were -deceived by others; they were hypocritical because others were so too; -and they robbed and plundered others, because they were robbed and -plundered themselves. In this moral chaos they forgot to cultivate -the intellectual force of reasoning; they thus further disturbed -the already deranged equilibrium between morals and intellect. And -though they had gunpowder before the West of Europe, it remained in -the far East of Asia a mere toy to amuse young and old at festivals, -whilst in the possession of Western Europe it became, next to the -art of printing, the most powerful agent of civilisation. They had -paper before the West of Europe; they knew how to print at least -five centuries before Europe thought of re-inventing this Chinese -invention. They are as polite, if not politer, than the most civilised -Frenchman, and are witty and good-humoured. They have no fear of -death; trade with the same skill and perseverance as we; cultivate the -soil with even greater industry and ability than we; so that their -territory, about equal in extent to the whole of Europe, looks like -one great well-drained and irrigated garden, in which no spot which -can yield some return for assiduous labour is left uncultivated. There -is amongst the 400,000,000 of subjects of one single emperor not -one who cannot read and write. All places in the administration are -assigned after a severe competitive examination, and still they lack -the capacity of self-conscious, independent reasoning both in science -and art. They can paint a tiger-skin with such truthfulness that it -appears a real skin, framed under glass; but in the conception and -reproduction of the head of the ferocious brute, with its bloodthirsty -jaws and its merciless cruelty, they altogether fail. They have an -aversion to a proportionate division of space; they never attempt to -counterbalance their artistic ideas, and to arrange them according to -a law. They abhor spiritual, imaginary, and all higher intellectual -culture to such a degree, that they concentrate all their powers on -mere technicalities. Therefore they have remained stationary, whilst -others, who began their self-conscious national existence thousands -of years later, have left them far behind. The Chinese sacrifice -everything to preconceived ideas of custom--in morals, science, and -art. As our forefathers did, let us do also. The result of this -principle has been that curious, grotesque, and ingenious, but above -all childish art, which we must study as the link between savage and -Aryan art. Whilst the Negro scarcely went beyond geometrical figures, -we find the Turanian already capable of using plants and the lower -kinds of animals in ornamentation, in addition to geometrical figures. -As soon, however, as he approaches beings, in whom proportion, action, -and expression, as the higher elements of form, prevail, he loses his -power of reproduction altogether. - -Matter-of-fact prose is the element of the Turanian; he is without -every higher artistic feeling, because his mode of writing, speaking, -and thinking, his religious, social, and political organisation, has -till lately checked all expansion of the imagination, and the use of -the intellectual faculties. Art with him has remained undeveloped, and -however interesting his products may be, they form only a subject for -our curiosity and perhaps momentary fashion, showing what humanity at -large did when in its _infancy_. - - - - -CHAPTER V. - -INDIA, PERSIA, ASSYRIA, AND BABYLON. - - -Our tree of art, with its manifold branches, flowers, and fruits, -rooted in the unknown origin of the three great groups of humanity, -shows that the Negro, or black branch, had a very short growth. It -still lives on in savage art, but is crippled, and has no vitality. -Next we have seen the long line of Turanian art, represented by -the Chinese; it originates in the geological age, passes through -the mythical, traditional, and historical periods, and continues -uninterruptedly to modern times. We have up to this point treated of -the artistic productions of the Negro and Turanian groups, both of -which stand without the pale of real history. - -We now take up the art-history of the Aryan, the historical group. -The birth-place of this group undoubtedly was Central Asia. Thence -the pure Aryan group took two divergent roads. One division crossed -over the Himâlâya Mountain chain, and settled round the Brahmapootra, -the Indus and Ganges rivers, and the other remained on this side -of the mountains. The Aryans may, therefore, be best divided into -Trans-Himâlâyans and Cis-Himâlâyans. In these two groups we find the -oldest traces of a power slowly awakening to full consciousness. We -can perceive in remote ages, only measurable by means of analogy and -deduction, an endeavour to solve the greatest problems of our existence. - -To find answers to these _three_ questions: Where from? What for? Where -to? To measure the _three_ dimensions of space and time; to trace -the cause of which the _three_, ever stable and still ever varying, -phenomena are the effect; and to know what creation, preservation and -annihilation, or rather only transformation, are, has been the chief -aim of the Aryan mind; and, as history teaches us, they have found more -or less distinct answers to these questions. We are not only capable -of philologically tracing the development of the different languages -of the Aryan group step by step to one common parent-language--the -Sanskrit, but the art-historian may trace every mysterious conception -of the powers of nature, every form of personification or incarnation, -and every religious tenet or mystery, symbol or myth, to these same -Indians, who with the words _Pitâ_, _Matâ_, _Brahtâ_, _Duihtâ_, -have taught us the holiest relations of our family life. For words, -like pictures, are only representatives of outward impressions. To -the Trans-and Cis-Himâlâyan Aryans we can trace all theogonies, -cosmogonies, systems of esoteric pathology and mythic anthropology. -They first saw in geometrical forms the phenomena of the material as -well as the spiritual world; gave meaning and interpretation to these -mystic types; peopled heaven and earth with visible and invisible, -good and evil, gods, goddesses, and spirits. They first acknowledged -the 'noumenal,' or invisible, divine nature with its creative force; -and recognised the 'phenomenal,' or visible, nature of the world -as an emanation, evolution, development, outgrowth, or mere work -of the invisible Creator. All the gods of the Persians, Assyrians, -Babylonians, Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, and a great number of -the customs of Hebrews and Christians, may be traced back to Indian -conceptions, forms, and modes of worship. - -Not historical events only, but the whole life of humanity centres -round religion. For science and art were in olden times the direct -offsprings of religion. Neither science nor art can be understood, -unless we have a clear insight into the mythologies and religious -conceptions of the ancient peoples. Our great mistake has been, that -till very lately we detached one of the different branches of the tree -of knowledge. We criticised its bark, leaves, blossoms, and fruits -separately, never concerning ourselves about the ramifications of the -root, the soil in which it first spread, the chemical substances on -which it fed, the conditions of climate under which it flourished or -withered, never enquiring whether it brought forth only flowers and -never fruits, or for what purposes its fruits and flowers were used -by those who gathered both. Now without such understanding artists are -mere unconscious machines, groping in the dark of ignorance, never -capable of a clear reproduction of forms. Education and a higher -conception flow like invisible magnetic streams through the hand, -whether it hold pencil, paint-brush, chisel, or engraver's needle, and -endow the work of art with a vitality which forms its real charm. It -is never the technical correctness that appeals to us most strongly -when contemplating even the smallest work of art, but the thought which -animated the artist when constructing his forms. - -Whilst the savage scarcely ever acquires a correct notion of time and -space, and the Turanian only a limited one, the Aryan gathers from -them the first dim recognition of the Infinite. In time and space -perceptible changes take place, through the influence of an invisible -power which creates all visible things. In time and space all created -things are preserved, and in time and space all either perish or assume -different forms. The Aryans endeavoured to express these abstract, -yet concrete phenomena by signs. A triangle with three equal sides -appeared best to express the mystery of the three equally powerful -forces--creation, preservation, and transformation. - -In the very earliest dawn of civilisation, therefore, the triangle -became the hallowed symbol of the Divinity. After the _Symbolic_ and -_Dialectic_ period had given place to the _Mythological_, time and -space were looked upon as the origin of all things, out of which -Brahma, Vishnu, and S'iva had sprung. These three incomprehensible -forces were expressed by geometrical figures, or, so to speak, -crystallised, before they became incarnate persons. The creator had the -sign of a double triangle [Illustration: (apexes upwards)] which formed -three triangles symbolically representing the three forces in ONE, the -CREATOR. Vishnu was designated by an equilateral triangle with the apex -pointing downwards, [Illustration] meaning the preserver; whilst S'iva -had for his symbol a triangle with the apex upwards, [Illustration] -denoting the transformer. - -The divinities were placed in the following order: S'iva first, then -Vishnu, and Brahma last, to whom no temples were built. This was the -case with nearly all the races of the Aryan group; there are scarcely -any temples to Amn, Brahma, Zeruane-Akerene, Uranos, Wodan, &c. - - -The order of the symbols, as given below, with their five -significations-- - -[Illustration: - - (Triangle apex up, Triangle apex down, Three triangles as trapezoid) - - S'IVA. VISHNU. BRAHMA. - - 1. Transformer, Preserver, Creator, - 2. Fire, Water, Sun, - 3. Justice, Wisdom, Power, - 4. Future, Present, Past, - 5. Time, Space, Matter,] - -produced the most sacred word-- - - =AVM= or =ÔM=, - -expressed by this triangular combination-- - -[Illustration: (Six-pointed star)] - -This was the mysterious TRIMURTY of the Indians, from which in time, -according to the influences of nature, the degree of intellectual -development, and the social and political condition of the different -groups of the Aryan races, grew the different mystic conceptions of the -_triune_ power in _one_, working in nature. - -Whilst the Trans-Himâlâyans, influenced by a gorgeous nature, allowed -their imagination to run wild, and to distort the primitive mystic -simplicity of these religious conceptions, the Cis-Himâlâyans remained -more faithful to the first impressions of nature, and worshipped Light -and Fire as the symbols of intellect, righteousness, and virtue, in -opposition to Night, as the symbol of ignorance, injustice, and sin. -To the triangular forms, the circle, [Illustration: (circle)] the -serpent, was added, the form without beginning and end; no wonder -that, encircling the equilateral triangle and joined to the square, -it became the symbol of the mysterious, incomprehensible forces of -nature. The [Illustration: triangle, square, and the circle] united, -intersected, combined, isolated, and crossed, formed the fundamental -lines of temples and their decorations. It was only at a later period -that animal and monstrous human forms were conceived to personify -abstract divine powers. The attributes of Ether, Water (Indra), and -Fire (Agni), were transformed into acting persons. The three equal -sides of the triangle, influenced by the imagination of the expounders -of matters divine, were changed into an individual with three heads, so -as to give a more comprehensible form to the incomprehensible divine -power. - -[Illustration: (Three heads with pointed caps)] - -The Trans-Himâlâyans, once settled on the gigantic triangular peninsula -stretching into the Indian Ocean, had leisure to work out a vast -theogony, which has served the Aryans down to our own days as a -store-house for different mythologies and religious systems. - -The _Divespiter_ of India (Deus pater, Jupiter) became the Lord of the -sky, the Lord of hosts; his weapon was the thunderbolt. He possessed a -splendid garden, the paradise, _nandana_. - -_Gânesa_ is Janus, the god with two heads. He was the guardian of -ways; he had a _rod_ or _sceptre_ in his hand (the shepherd's crook -or crosier) and a _key_--symbolic of his power to enter upon all the -important undertakings of mankind. - -_S'rî_ or _S'rîs_ (Seris--Ceres), also _Lakshmî_, _Padmâ_, and -_Camalâ_, was the goddess of abundance, sprung from the sacred Lotus. - -_S'iva_, the Greek _Zeus_, the Egyptian _Jao_, the Hebrew _Javeh_, the -Roman _Jovis_, with their analogous attributes of revenge, jealousy, -indomitable caprices, terror, and irreconciliation, all point to one -and the same origin. Of S'iva (as of Zeus, Jovis, or Javeh elsewhere) -it is recorded in Indian mythology that he had to fight with Daityas -(Titans, or fallen angels), the children of Dity. Indra, on this -occasion, provided the God of Fire, Justice, and Transformation with -fiery shafts. Again, Jove overthrew the Titans and giants, whom Typhon, -Bisareus, and Tityus led against the ruler of Olympus. The same is done -by Javeh or Jehovah, who hurled the legions of proud and overbearing -angels under Satan's rule into the infernal regions. The analogy is too -striking to require any further comment. - -_Paulastya_ (the Greek and Roman _Pluto_), or _Kuvêra_, the Egyptian -_Typhon_, the Hebrew _Satan_, bears a general family resemblance to the -conceptions of the chiefs of the lower regions. - -_Garuda_, the beautiful bird with a lovely human face attending on -Vishnu, is the prototype of the youthful, blooming _Ganymede_ attending -on Zeus, not only in similarity of name, but especially in similarity -of function. - -_Durga_, who takes her name from brandishing a lance, is, like _Pallas_ -or _Minerva_, the Indian representative of heroic valour and reflecting -wisdom. Both _Durga_ and _Pallas_ slew demons and giants with their own -hands; both protected the wise and virtuous who paid them due respect -and adoration. _Seraswati_ and Minerva have also much in common. The -Minerva of Italy invented the flute, and Seraswati presided over melody. - -_Is'wara_ and _Is'i_ of India are undoubtedly the originals of Osiris -and Isis. - -_Dypuc_ read backwards gives us _Cupid_. The Indian name is derived -from _De'paka_, the inflamer. The mischief-maker of India and -Greece had one and the same name. We find his name and character in -Shakespeare's masterly delineation of _Puck_. - -These analogies go much farther and deeper than is at first sight -apparent. - -_S'iva_ is said to have had three eyes, symbolic of the three -dimensions of time. A serpent, denoting the measurement of time by -years, formed his necklace. A second necklace of human skulls marked -the lapse and revolution of ages, and the extinction and succession -of the generations of mankind. He holds a trident in one hand, -signifying that the attributes of the other gods are united in him. -S'iva is also called _Trilôchana_ (three looks--_lôchan_, the eye, the -look). Pausanias tells us that Zeus was honoured with the name of -_Triophthalmos_ (three-eyed), and that a statue of Jupiter had been -found at the taking of Troy exhibiting the father of the gods with a -third eye in his forehead. - -Vishnu appeared on earth in several incarnations. The Indians look -upon the planets as habitable. The sun was set down as the motor, -directing the movements of these planets, furnishing them with light, -and endowing them with the genial heat of vitality. _Krishna_ (the -black or blue one) was, like the Greek Apollo, the symbol of the sun, -of light, of purity, and of love. He is represented as the promised -Saviour, the eighth incarnation of Vishnu. According to the Vedas, the -Earth complained to Vishnu, and demanded redress. It then received the -promise of a Comforter and of a total renovation. Time is then said to -have hastened to the birth of _Krishna_, 'that bright offspring of the -gods, who sets forward on his way to signal honours. The world with -its globular, ponderous frame, nodding signs of congratulation, when -the _sweet babe_ will distinguish his mother by her smiles!' Krishna, -whom the Samaritans believed to have been Joshua, the long hoped-for -Messiah, at last appeared on earth, where he passed a life of a most -extraordinary and incomprehensible nature. He is said to have been -the son of _Devaki_, a virgin, by King _Vasudévas_, but his birth -was concealed for fear of the tyrant _Kansa_, his uncle, to whom it -had been predicted that a child, born of that mother, would destroy -him, and put an end to his dominion. Krishna had to hide, and was -brought up in _Mal'hurâ_ by honest herdsmen. He performed most amazing -miracles, saved multitudes by his supernatural powers, raised the dead, -and descended into the infernal regions of Pátàla, where the king of -serpents, Séshánàga (suggestive of the name of Satana), ruled, that he -might reanimate the six sons of a pious Brahman, who had been killed -in battle. Krishna obtained a glorious victory on the banks of the -_Yamuná_ over the great serpent _Kaliya Nága_, which poisoned the air, -destroying the herds of that region. _Apollo_ also destroyed with his -arrows the serpent Python. The whole legend, in both instances, took -its origin in the action of the rays of the sun, purifying the air, and -dispersing the noxious vapours of the atmosphere, which bred loathsome -animals. Krishna and Apollo are thus identical in their actions. -Krishna is disappointed by Tulasi, Apollo by Daphne; both conceptions -liked the companionship of shepherds and shepherdesses. The _Tulasi_ -(or lotus) was sacred to Krishna, as the _Laurus_ (laurel) to Apollo. - -These and similar legends ought to be studied by artists to enable -them not only to understand Indian art from a higher point of view, -but to learn that many a monstrous form had a sacred symbolic meaning, -that outward signs may be hallowed by hidden conceptions; and that, -wherever this is the case, art will not succeed in reaching the -bright spheres of beauty. The finest sculptured Durga without her -necklace of human skulls, the protruding red tongue, the four arms -with outstretched fingers balancing severed human heads, &c., would -no longer convey to the mind of an Indian worshipper the idea of the -goddess of valour and wisdom. Thus we may understand how a baked clay -Indian idol, in spite of its revolting form, may be the symbol of some -grand idea, through which it obtains value in the eyes of the credulous -believer. In considering the causes that produced the peculiar -development of Indian art, we must not omit to refer to the continually -increasing power of the Brahmans. - -Symbolism and mysticism were used by the priests of all ancient -nations for thousands of years in preparing intoxicating draughts of -superstition for the people, and proving the necessity for making -sacrifices. At first depraved passions only were to be sacrificed, -but by degrees they tried to typify those passions by animals, -with analogous propensities. Goats became the representatives of -licentiousness; bulls, types of indomitable fury and insubordination; -and these animal types were offered to the gods. As soon as the priests -had convinced the people that the blood of animals, the smoke from -their burning bodies, the odour of roasting sheep, might appease the -anger of S'iva, fanaticism went a step further, and drew human beings -into the awful vortex of prejudice, and thousands of men and women were -crushed, joyfully screaming, under the heavy wheels of Jugurnaut's, -S'iva's, or Harris's cars. Men and women were burned alive; -intellectual progress stopped, asceticism and blind submission to -priestly despotism were enforced, and the possibility of a progressive -art was crushed for thousands of years. - -This desolate state of society required reform, and _Manû_ stepped -forward. He divided society into four distinct layers: the Brahmans, -Kshattryas, Vaisyas, and S'udras, of which the two first were Aryans, -the third caste Turanians, and the fourth Negroes; consequently, in -spite of the excellence of his laws, which were assumed to have been -dictated by Brahma himself, no real art was possible. - -The Indians have two great national epic poems, containing nearly the -whole substance of all the epic poems of the other Aryan races, and -the many scenes from the Ramâyâna and Mahâbhârata in carvings and -sculptures stand in the same relation to Greek art, as these poems -to the Iliad and Odyssee. In both, scenes of heroism are displayed; -but, whilst symmetry and proportion rule in the Greek poems, fantastic -irregularity, wild incongruities, exaggerations and impossibilities -are heaped up in the Indian. The beauty of some thought is effaced by -overburdened metaphors, gushing forth in an endless stream like the -waters of the Ganges. There are passages in the 28,000 double verses -of the Ramâyâna surpassing anything written. - -As an indisputable proof I will quote a few lines from the opening -passages of the Ramâyâna. The gods are assembled before the first, -incomprehensible cause, and address it in the following words:-- - - O Thou, whom _three_fold might and splendour veil, - _Maker_, _Preserver_, and _Transformer_, hail! - Thy gaze surveys this world from clime to clime, - Thyself immeasurable in space and time: - To no corrupt desires, no passions prone: - Unconquered conqueror, infinite, unknown; - Though in one form Thou veil'st Thy might divine, - Still, at thy pleasure, every form is Thine. - Pure crystals thus prismatic hues assume, - As varying lights and varying tints illume; - Men think Thee absent, Thou art ever near; - Pitying those sorrows which Thou ne'er canst fear. - Unsordid penance Thou alone canst pay; - Unchanged, unchanging--old without decay: - Thou knowest all things--who Thy praise can state? - Createdst all things--Thyself uncreate! - -The endeavour to give forms to such sublime abstractions made the -Indians lose their regulating power in pictorial and plastic art. A god -was to be made powerful, and he was provided with four or twenty arms, -and three heads. The miraculous and symbolic were the greatest enemies -of Indian art. - -In the Mahâbhârata, exceeding Homer's combined poems seven times in -quantity, having not less than 110,000 double verses, we read of -sentiments, feelings, and deeds which are our own--but nothing is -within the pale of the credible. The birth of all the heroes is -miraculous. Their deeds surpass the standard of human acts. They -constantly associate with the gods, talk, argue, and dispute with -them; their palaces are of immeasurable grandeur and splendour: ivory -gates inlaid with jewels, golden pillars, diamond thrones, glittering -with the splendour of a thousand suns; their armies are reckoned by -millions; their heroes uproot trees, and kill hundreds of thousands at -one blow; time and space have no meaning with them. Kings reign 27,000 -years; Prathama-Raja reigned 6,300,000 and lived 8,400,000 years.[1] -How could art in a higher sense exist under such conditions? - - [1] By striking off the zeros, which are put on by the - Brahmans _out of respect_, the figures may be reduced to - some natural compass of possibility. - -Art in a more comprehensible form appeared in India only when Buddha -came to attempt a second regeneration of the people. He abolished -castes, preached equality and freedom, and succeeded in awakening a -high force of artistic activity in the dreamy Indians. But their art -was altogether confined to the construction of rock-hewn temples, of -stupas, topes, and religious buildings--architectural constructions in -comparison with which even our greatest cathedrals dwindle into mere -child's play. Their works of art are tinged with the same exaggerations -as their great heroic poems, and when Buddhism was stamped out -in its birth-place about the seventh century A.D., the Brahmans -constructed their temples, vying with those of the Buddhist artists in -architectural grandeur. They went back to their monstrosities, but they -could no longer check the artistic power of the Aryan spirit. - -The rock-hewn and isolated temples of India have details in stucco, -of ornamentation, foliage, and general decoration, which, like their -mythology, their heroic poems, and their abstruse philosophy, went -through all the artistic metamorphoses of pliable, plastic, elastic and -solid substances. In all we observe an unbounded play of imagination, -uncontrolled by any law of symmetry. The walls are decorated with the -most exquisite shawl and lace patterns, either in stucco or hewn in -stone; a proof that before the application of those delicate forms to -wall decorations they must have existed as textile fabrics of high -finish. The rock-hewn temples exhibit clear imitations of rafters -and cross-beams; wood had, therefore, been long in use before they -attempted to imitate it in stone. Their sculptures are wood-carvings, -terra-cotta or plaster-of-Paris works, turned into stone. The -pliability of the softer materials visibly predominates. The gateways -before the Sanchi Tope (see the masterly cast of one of these in the -South Kensington Museum), though hewn in stone, are a close imitation -of wooden posts and cross-beams joined together. This imitation is so -faithful that even the rough and crooked outlines of the badly-cut -posts and beams are preserved. The richness and variety of their -decorative patterns, as also the minuteness of the details, prove that -such patterns must have been carved in wood or fashioned in clay long -before they were executed in the harder material--stone. Stucco must -have served as a means of transition from wood-carving to sculpture. -In the Ramâyâna the town of Agodhyá, built by _Manû_ (the father -and lawgiver of _man_kind), is thus described: 'It was adorned with -beautiful palaces, high as mountains, and with houses of many stories; -everything shining as in Indra's heaven. Its aspect had a charming -effect. The town was enlivened by ever-changing colours; regular -bowers and sweetly-blooming trees delighted the eyes. It was full -of precious stones. Its walls were covered with variegated-coloured -fields resembling a chess board,' &c.; the latter allusion giving a -description of tesselated or mosaic work with which the walls must -have been decorated. In a description of a palace in the Sakuntalâ, -by Kalidâsa, who lived a century B.C., we read: 'Over the gate rises -an arch of ivory; above it float flags of a deep yellow hue, the -tassels of which appear to beckon and to call to you: Step in--step -in. The _panels_ of the door are of gold and stucco, glittering like -the diamond breast of a god. Look here! there is a row of palaces -shining like the moon, like shells, like the stem of a water-lily. -_The stucco is laid on as thick as a hand._ Golden steps adorned with -different stones lead to the higher rooms, from which _crystal_ -windows surrounded with pearls look down, glittering like the bright -eyes of a beautiful maiden.' The passage that the stucco was laid -on as thick as a hand can only mean that the ornament was worked in -relief. Richly-painted ornamentation in stucco with mosaic and other -patterns must therefore have existed. These undoubtedly originated, -like the Persian, Assyrian, and Babylonian wall-decorations, in textile -fabrics, which, having been found to perish too quickly, were made of a -stronger, more durable material, preserving, however, all the character -of the original patterns and material. - -The Indians are distinguished by a keen observation of nature, and, -so far as the conventional treatment of flowers, fruits, creepers, -trees, and animals is concerned, we may learn much from them; but we -have carefully to avoid their over-ornamentation. In their treatment -of architecture, want of subordination of the single parts to a -well-proportioned total is the greatest fault; in their sculptures -of the human figure, the soft and waving lines predominate, creating -a kind of voluptuous sensuality which is entirely opposed to good -sculpture. Their naturalism is objectionable, and leads to a wild, -fantastic coarseness which can never be pardoned in art. Measure and -harmony are wanting. Gorgeous and mean, powerful and petty, sublime -and ugly, are their products. Indian art, religion, and poetry are so -closely united that it is impossible to understand the one without -a diligent study of the other two. We have in Indian art the first -attempts of humanity to step out of childhood. To children, wisdom -is best communicated in symbols, mystic signs, fables, legends, -and fairy-tales, and therefore Indian art is distinguished by -these characteristics. The _tupo_, _sutupo_ or _sutheouphu_, from -the Sanskrit _stûpa_, a heap (our word _top_) or a pile of earth, -corresponding to a tumulus, was at the same time a symbol of the -religious principles of the Hindoos. It is said of Buddha that he -once preached to his disciples, on the shores of the Ganges, on the -instability of all things, the frailty of human life, on the grief and -sorrows of our existence, comparing life to a water-bubble, consisting -of the four elements and still perishing so quickly. The water-bubble -thus lent its form to the tope and _daghopa_, which latter, according -to W. v. Humboldt, means 'hider of the body,' destined for the -reception of Buddha's relics. The tower which rises inside the tope -is symbolic of the nine incarnations of Vishnu. We have in the Indian -temple, as in our Gothic churches, a homily in stone. The arched dome -has to remind us of the perishableness of life; the daghopa, with its -seven or nine divisions, tells us that there is hope for the immortal -soul to reach heaven through seven or nine degrees of purification. The -protecting canopies (umbrellas) are symbolic of Buddha's intercession, -which he is sure to accord, if we only recognise the _nihilism_ -(nothingness) of our earthly existence. - -The religious construction was also extended to every-day utensils, a -tendency which was universal with all the people of the Aryan group. -To these typical ornamentations belong the lotus flower and the tree -and serpent ornament. The religious conception is everything with -the Indian. It is not the form itself that he cares for, but the -religious thought which is expressed emblematically, allegorically, or -symbolically. This is the reason why he clings to his fourteen-armed -divinities. It is God and His powers that he wishes to represent; but, -whenever man attempts to express the incomprehensible or the abstract -in visible and concrete forms, he errs. The soul of the Indian is -absorbed in God: in Him is everything; the world is _without_ Him and -still _within_ Him. All beings take their origin in Him and return -to Him. An everlasting _emanation_ and _absorption_ is continually -proceeding before the eyes of the Indian, and, looking for a type of -this wonderful process, he found it in the '_Aswatha_' tree, the Indian -fig-tree (_Ficus Indica_). The banyan takes root, so to speak, in -the air, grows downwards, grasps the earth with its branches, shoots -upwards again, and repeats this process 'ad infinitum.' Everything -coming near its feelers is embraced, covered over, and in this mystic -encircling, annihilated. From time immemorial this sacred tree has -been the _tree of life_, the symbolic tree of the petrifaction, -vivification, and incarnation of God's spirit in minerals, plants, -animals and man. This pantheistic conception is not favourable to art: -it crushes the powers of the artist, who has to deal with too great an -ideal weight in forms. - -There is another species of fig-tree (_Ficus religiosa_) which does not -take root again, but the leaves of which appear eternally to tremble; -it became the symbol of the ever-moving and oscillating spheres filling -the universe. The tree combines two working cosmical forces, it partly -remains the same and still continually changes and varies; it is now -covered only with leaves, by degrees with leaves and blossoms, and at -last with leaves and fruits; then its vitality apparently dying away, -leaves, blossoms, and fruits vanish, to be renewed again with the same -regularity and abundance. The mind, not yet accustomed to account for -every phenomenon by simple or compound gases, globules, or atoms, set -in motion by affinities, is altogether absorbed by the miraculous -phenomena of nature, and, having been kept for thousands of years in -this absorption, is incapable of seeing objects in their proper light. -It sees in every form a metaphysical cause, which leads in ornamental -art to those entwined, confused, monstrous, and bizarre combinations, -which mar _symmetry_, mock _eurythmy_, distort _proportion_, have -no _direction_, and, trying to express the inexpressible, have no -_expression_ at all. - -The artist, if he wishes to work in the Indian style, must make himself -acquainted with the feelings that animate the Indian mind. He will -do best by generally using their arabesques, and arranging them after -a careful study of the antique into symmetrical forms. The Indian -conventional treatment of plants in surface-decorations is unsurpassed, -and in this we may learn from them; but we have to beware of their -monotonous excellence, and their everlasting repetitions. We may, here -and there, use their forms, but we must bring order and measure into -the wild and unintelligible chaos. If we want to produce entirely -Indian patterns we must not alter them, or else we destroy their -effect; but we may be original in merely using the form, and endowing -it with a spirit of our own; this being the great advantage of the -historical study of art. - -Indian architecture has been well systematised by Mr. Fergusson. We -have in the north the Bengallee, in the south the Dravidian, and in -the west the Chalúkyan style; besides these we have three distinct -religious styles--the Brahmanic, the Buddhistic, and, at a later -period, the Mahomedan. - -Turning to the Cis-Himâlâyans, who appear under numberless names of -tribes, nations, and races, and by degrees peopled Assyria, Babylon, -Persia, Greece, Northern Europe, Italy, Spain, France, and England, and -carried religion and civilisation into Egypt; we begin to tread, for -the first time, on really _historical_ ground, for we shall be able to -place events in time absolute. - -Persia--the Hebrew Elam, the Indian Paraça, from Pars, or Fars, -or Fardistan--differs entirely in geographical position, climate, -and natural products from China or India. Hekatæos, Artemidoros, -Eratosthenes, and Strabo describe the climate and soil of Persia as -cold and sterile in the north, temperate and fertile in the central -or valley regions, and hot and enervating in the south. We have, -therefore, enterprising activity, energetic courage from the north, -and a counteracting regulating element in the centre, tinged with the -dreamy idleness of the south. The aspect of nature is less oppressive. -Instead of gigantic creepers, the vine, with its juicy grapes, clings -to tall and fruitful trees; bright-eyed gazelles abound; lions and -tigers excite to daring hunts; exquisitely-coloured and fragrant roses -perfume the air, and open the mind to the gentler impressions of a -tender beauty. The Persians, Assyrians, and Babylonians rose to power, -declined, and passed away with all their grandeur; but in these very -changes there were activity and life. The Persians were the first -to proclaim a governing universal _unity_, which endowed men with -forces, enabling them to become virtuous and intellectual _by their own -exertions_. They remained faithful to the first impressions of nature, -in which the Eternal Spirit revealed himself. - -The Persians, like the Indians, expressed the cosmical elements of -creation symbolically by means of geometrical signs, which are given -below. - -[Illustration: (Five simple shapes, stacked, representing ether, air, -fire, water, and earth)] - -[Illustration: (Human-like diagram derived from simple shapes)] - -This _five_ in _one_ comprised the creation; it was the work of Chudâ -(Khuda), Choda from the Sanskrit Svadâtta (self-given, God-given). -From the Zend word Chuda, or Choda, we have the words GOTT and GOD. -At a later period man's imagination soon perceived in these abstract -signs a concrete form; it turned _Cha_ into the head of a being, _Ka_ -into the arms, _Ra_ into the chest, _Wa_ into the lower parts of the -body, and _A_ into the feet, and thus the first embryonic, ill-shapen -incarnation, or embodiment, of the creative power of nature was formed. -This embryo, by degrees, developed into the master-pieces of Greek -sculpture. - -In Persia, the pure and exalted consciousness of a first, -incomprehensible cause leaving its products, the special manifestations -of its creative power, _free_ in themselves, was fostered and -developed. To the Persians we owe the first clear conception of a God -independent of nature. Spirit and matter are not _one_ with them, -as with the Indians. With the Persians God is separated from His -creation--the universe. God, as the ruling Spirit, acquires subjective -reality; man, His creature, whether good or bad, whether poor or -rich, whether righteous or unrighteous, whether high or low, is, as -His creature, equal and free. Man thus obtained a free position face -to face, if we may say so, with the Supreme Being--the Creator. What -a totally different mode of thinking to that in China or India! In -China man is a mere machine, regulated by stereotyped moral maxims. -In India duties and rights depend on the chance of birth; the Brahman -is a born priest, whether he has talent or not for his vocation; the -Kshattriya, a born soldier, though he may be the greatest coward; the -Vaisya, a born merchant or artisan, in spite of his utter incapacity -for business; and the S'udra, a born slave, though he may be gifted -with greater wisdom than the Brahman, more heroic virtues than the -Kshattriya, and more talent for commerce, trade, or art than the Vaisya. - -In Persia the Aryans acquired, for the first time, a kind of collective -freedom, but not yet an individual consciousness as free agents. The -Indian language and Indian metaphysics, in the garb of mythology, were -undoubtedly components of Egyptian, Persian, Assyrian, Chaldæan, and -Babylonian art, and the forms thus produced, in their turn, became -the direct elements out of which Grecian art in its infancy developed -itself. - -The Persians are direct descendants of the Zend people. Their language -is nearly the same as Sanskrit. Out of ten Zend words, seven or eight -are Sanskrit. - -Persian history may be traced back into time relative; for, when it -passes into time absolute, the advanced state of the people in science, -especially in astronomy, their social condition, and their architecture -and ornamental art, prove that they must have existed in a social bond -for thousands of years, in order to develop and to attain that progress -which excites our astonishment even after the lapse of more than 6,000 -years. - -Their history may be divided into the following periods:-- - -1. The mythic period, from an unknown time down to the foundation of -the vast, well-organised, and powerful Persian empire by Kai-Khorus, -or Kyrus, in the sixth century B.C. - -2. The second period affords reliable accounts of the existence of the -empire down to Alexander the Great, from 560 B.C.-330 B.C. - -3. The history of the Persians, as members of the Greek-Makedonian -empire, ending with the conquest of Persia by the Arabs from 330 -B.C.-137 B.C. - -4. The empire of Central Persia, under the Arabs, down to its -extinction by the Mahomedans in 651 A.D. - -5. The dominion of the Kaliphs down to its destruction in 1258 A.D. - -6. The last period continuing to our own time. - -The mythic and historical periods of Persia resemble two diverging -lines, of which the undoubted fact of the reign of Kai-Khorus forms -the connecting point. Whilst the historical line grows more and -more distinct as it proceeds, the mythic line retreats farther and -farther into the dim region of the unknown. Passing from the known -to the unknown, we must assign to the development of Zend thoughts, -institutions, mode of writing, and mode of building, a greater -antiquity than to the Assyrian and Babylonian monuments. Of Persian -remains we possess nothing but skeleton buildings, which, from the -entire absence of connecting walls, lead us to infer that they were -still mere tents, and that the textile fabric had not yet undergone the -further process of incrustation in stucco or stone sculpture. - -This is not the case with Nineveh and Babylon, the great towns, or, -as we should say, the great empires, on the Tigris and Euphrates. -Through the indefatigable exertions of the Right Hon. Mr. Layard, M. -Botta, Lord Loftus, and Mr. Rassam, we possess now, in London and -Paris, tablets with records more than 3,000 years old. The boundary -stones prove that some fixed laws regulated territorial property, -even at these remote periods. The personal ornaments, consisting -of mother-of-pearl studs, silver rings, bracelets, gold and pearl -earrings, beads, and shell-bosses with bronze pins, testify to a high -civilisation. The mode of writing in Nineveh and Babylon was borrowed -from the Zend people; and the religious conceptions of the Persians are -undoubtedly older than the already-complicated idolatry based on the -astronomical notions of the Assyrians and Babylonians. - -The Zend-Avesta (meaning the living word) may be said to be like an -Egyptian Nile-meter, erected on the primeval soil of history, measuring -the yearly deposits and alluvial sediments of by-gone ages. Through -the pure crystals of myth and poetry we may see the inner formation -of society, whilst from without the vast construction of history is -mysteriously going on. We wander through endless lines of Memnon -statues, all resounding with the legends of past ages, in perusing the -Zend-Avesta, and are suddenly led before the fountain of all matter, at -which the high-priest stands, commanding in the harmony of the seven -planets the birth of the world, and the origin of all things. - -Our first parents, according to the Zend-Avesta, dwelt in _Eriene -Veedjo_, or _Iran Veji_, or Aria, Aturia, Asshuria, meaning the -_fiery_ or _bright_ land, figuratively the blessed land, in a happy -garden, the paradise, assigned to them by _Ormuzd_--contraction of -_Ahura-Mazda_ (the divine Being or the Great Lord). From this they were -driven by Agrômainyus, _Ahriman_, the murderer from the beginning, -who changed the seasons, transforming the _seven_ beautiful summer -months into _ten_ cold and dreary winter months, leaving only _two_ -tolerably warm months. The division of the year into _twelve_ months -is clearly proved by this mythic statement. Can anyone count the ages, -and describe the means by which Persians, Chaldæans, Medes, Egyptians, -and Indians arrived at a systematic arrangement of time, dividing -the year into twelve months? After the reign of the Abads (fathers, -_abbas_) _Azer-Abad_ ruled; then _Dshey-Afram, Kedor-la-Omer_ (Cadam, -Adam) followed; he ruled 560 years, and attained the venerable age of -one thousand years. We find here, as in all old records, the tendency -to ascribe to man a longevity which he has long lost. Like shadows -which are more gigantic in the rising and setting sun than in the -broad mid-day, historical facts in the first dawn of consciousness are -exaggerated and turned into fables, which again vanish in the bright -light of scientific criticism. _Cadam_ was followed by _Siamek_, who -was succeeded by _Tahamur_, who conquered the Devas, or evil spirits. -He learned from them the art of writing and reading, constructed -aqueducts and viaducts, and taught his people music and the use of -iron. The Aryans on this side of the Himâlâyas had passed the savage -state (the _palæolithic_ period of art), entered into the nomadic (the -neolithic period), settled down and used bronze instruments, and then -were taught, _no longer_ as with the Indians, Egyptians, and Greeks _by -a divinity_, but by one of their rulers, to extract iron from the ore -and to work it. With Tahamur we step into the iron or historical age. - -_Dshemshid_, the Greek _Achæmenes_, the Biblical _Nimrod_, the -mighty hunter before the Lord, _pierced the earth with a golden -dagger_--allegorically meaning that he improved agriculture. Dshemshid -ruled 616½ years; he built Persepolis, or Takt-i-Dshemshid (the throne -of Dshemshid). He was, however, conquered by _Zahok_ and _sawn into -two pieces_, meaning that the empire of Dshemshid had been divided by -_Zahok_, who was a descendant of the cursed race of Aad. He is said to -have been the _Sesostris_, or _Sesoosis_, of the third dynasty of the -Egyptians, the 332nd king after Menes the builder of Memphis, a great -conqueror who went to India, took possession of Thracia and Skythia, -and united Æthiopia, Libya, and Egypt into one mighty empire in the -fortieth century B.C. He is also said to have been _Ninus_, who with -Semiramis, the night-born queen of doves, and the daughter of the -water-sprung _Derceto_, is set down as the builder of Nineveh, and -the founder of the empire of Babel. Takt-i-Dshemshid existed before -either Nineveh or Babylon; its priority is borne out not only by these -records, but, as we have said, by the very ruins left of the Persian -metropolis. The name _Parsagad_, or _Passagarda_, means '_camp_ of the -Persians,' and points to an early, unsettled state of society; as also -do the ruins, which may be divided into two classes:-- - -1. The ancient Persian monuments of Dshemshid. - -2. The monuments of the reign of the Sassanides. - -The name Persepolis was first used by the Greek historiographers who -accompanied Alexander the Great, to denote that part only of the vast -town in which the tomb of Kyrus was situated, and this gave rise to -much confusion. - -Passagarda, Isthakr, or Estakar, was situated on the border of one -of the richest and most beautiful plains of Central Asia, watered by -the Bendemir (the Araxes of the ancients), and surrounded by lofty -mountains, 'whose rugged masses rise from the verdant plain like -islands from the ocean.' - -The _oldest_ monuments are:-- - -1. The ruins of the palace now called by the Arabs _Tshil-Minar_ (the -forty columns), and two great tombs close by. - -2. Four other tombs, about four and a half English miles to the -north-west, and in the plains of Murghab the ruins of Passagarda, -built by Kyrus to commemorate his victory over Astyages, who came from -Hamadan (Ecbatana). Here is situated the pyramidically-constructed tomb -of Kyrus, made of white marble blocks. Farther north are the ruins of -_Bisutun_. - -Passing to the monuments under the reign of the _Sassanides_; they -consist of reliefs and inscriptions hewn in rock at a distance of about -four and a half miles from the ruins of Persepolis. They are called -_Naksh-i-Rustam_ (the image of Rustam), because it was assumed that the -exploits of this hero were here glorified. De Sacy, in his 'Mémoires -sur diverses Antiquités de la Perse,' has explained the inscriptions -as referring to the kings of the Sassanide dynasty. The reliefs are -portraits of these kings, recognisable by their head-dresses. - -The distance from Passagarda to Tshil-Minar is about forty-nine English -miles, and this space is crowded with Persian monuments. It is most -probable that the more recently-made subdivisions did not exist, but -that the capital of the ancient Persian empire extended from Passagarda -to Tshil-Minar, including Isthakr, Naksh-i-Rustam, and the king's -palace, called by the Greeks Persepolis. The palace was cut out of -the beautiful grey marble rock towering over it, and stood on three -well-defined, gradually-rising platforms. The arrangement was like that -of the Indian, Egyptian, and later Greek temples; the first terrace -corresponding to the Pronaos, where the people paid their homage to the -king; the second to the Naos, where the ambassadors of the different -nations assembled; and the third to the Adytum, where the king had his -special temple and private abode. The whole foundation was constructed -of bold Kyklopean masonry. - -At the gates stood colossal fabulous animals, fantastic representations -combined of the lion, the bull, the horse, the wild ass, the -rhinoceros, the ostrich, the eagle, the scorpion, and the unicorn. -Besides these there were winged and horned animals, and others having -the winged body of a lion, the feet of a horse, and the head of a man, -with well-curled, long beard and crowned with the tiara--the symbol of -the king's power, endowed with intellect, force, and swiftness. The -bull with the Persians was, like Nundi with the Indians, Apis with the -Egyptians, and Taurus with the Greeks, a sign of strength and power. - -The capitals of Persian columns were not yet made to support a heavy -stone weight, but only a light wooden beam. The foundation walls -were, like those of Nineveh and Babylon, covered with sculptures, the -designs of which were all of textile origin. But in these sculptures, -as in those of Kouyunjik and the Palace of Nimrod, the theological, or -religious, and symbolical element is entirely left in the background. -We have the friends, relations, and servants of the king; tributaries -submitting to kings; officers holding fly-flaps of feathers; horses -crossing rivers; kings hunting and slaying lions; armies before -besieged towns; warriors returning from battle; battering rams; chains -to destroy the action of rams; soldiers mining ramparts; infantry with -bows and shields; removals of cattle and spoil from captured cities; -boats floating on rivers; galleys going to sea; damsels and children -with musical instruments; and mathematical tablets with calculations -of square roots. We have man active, warring, scientific, and only -here and there some scenes of a religious character, and these more -frequently in Nineveh and Babylon. - -The cause of this phenomenon was the religion of the Zend people. Its -founder was Zarathustra, Zerdusht, {Soroatheos}, Zoroaster--partly a -mythical, partly a real person. His name appears to have been derived -from the Sanskrit Sûrya-dêvas, meaning 'the Sun-god.' According to -Aristotle Zoroaster lived 6,000 years before Plato. The Biblical Abram, -Sesostris the Egyptian king, and Moses, were all honoured by this name. -Svedius mentions a Zoroaster 500 years before the Trojan war. The -historical Zoroaster, the compiler of the religious tenets of the Zend -people in the Zend-Avesta, lived about 589 B.C.; he was therefore a -contemporary of Confucius, Pythagoras, Jeremiah, and Ezra. He received -the holy books from Ormuzd on Mount Elbruz. - -The Zend-Avesta assumes _one_ Universal Being, clothed in an outward -form, but this form is _Light_. Light is neither a serpent, nor a -stone, nor a four-handed monster, nor a three-headed Brahma, nor a -bull, owl, or hawk; it is a simple manifestation, it has no particular -existence, it perceptibly pervades universality. It admits of a highly -symbolical interpretation; it is virtue, it is truth, proficiency, -knowledge, and directing will. Light involves an opposite--darkness, -just as virtue has an antithesis--evil. Both light and darkness took -their origin in the unlimited All (Zeruane-Akerene). We have here -clearly a purer Trinitarian conception. We have (1) the Infinite -All, producing (2) light or good (Ormuzd), and (3) darkness or evil -(Ahriman). With the Indians _Brahma_ is ether; _Vishnu_, water; and -_S'iva_, fire; and in spite of all spiritualisation we have _matter_ -before us. The Persians, in becoming conscious of light and darkness, -destroyed the innocence of mankind, but proclaimed to the world _moral_ -consciousness. Without a knowledge of evil there is no knowledge of -good; to be virtuous is to know the evil and to do the good. - -This led the Cis-Himâlâyans a step further. The two opposing -phenomena, light and darkness, were placed, like good and evil, purity -and impurity, right and wrong, truth and falsehood, knowledge and -ignorance, in eternal conflict. Creation was thus considered as in -everlasting strife. This strife was life-activity in honour of Ormuzd -or Ahriman. This activity was carried beyond this world; for the -followers of Ormuzd, there was a heaven, and for the followers of -Ahriman, a hell in the future. Ormuzd had _Fervers_ as attendants; -Ahriman, _Dews_ or _Devas_ (in Keltic _Dusii_, devils). On the Persian -and Assyrian slabs we see, floating over the heads of the kings, their -winged portraits; these represent their protecting Fervers, one of whom -continually watched over each good man, and protected him from the -influences of Ahriman's servants. - -The worship of Ormuzd, in whose sight all creatures were _equal_, but -equally dependent, was threefold:-- - -(_a_) _Pure thoughts_, through which alone we may approach the -beginning of all things, wisdom and light--God. - -(_b_) _Pure words_, the word of God (the Logos), which is no longer -personified as some visible form, but is the mere vibration of the -spirit of God, embodied in abstract signs in the Zend-Avesta. - -(_c_) _Pure deeds_, accomplished by one's own efforts, as we are -endowed with perfect individual freedom. - -This religion was the cause why the Persians had no special temples, -but only small altars. The vaulted azure heavens were the glorious -temple of Ormuzd, which he was compelled to share with Ahriman. -Neither light nor darkness, however, could be carved or painted; the -dynamic force of the artists was therefore directed to matter-of-fact -scenes, to ornamentations, showing a better balance between forms and -ideas. The rosette, the palmette, the sun with its disc, the moon, -the pine-cone, the pomegranate, intermixed with clearly-defined, and -not much entwined, geometrical patterns, were the principal means of -ornamentation. - -At a later period a tendency to allegorical and emblematic figures -appeared. The artists composed cherubim, chimeras, basilisks, griphons, -kentaurs, and sphinxes; undoubtedly influenced by Indian and Egyptian -ideas, for Nineveh and Babylon were the ancient Venice and Genoa of -the far East, situated as they were on the commercial high-roads, the -twin-rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates. The Babylonian textile -fabrics were highly appreciated from time immemorial. Serpents and -trees, winged witches and flying-fish, were first spell-bound in -Babylonian tapestry, and then carved in stone on the walls of Nineveh. -The immense riches which we possess in the British Museum, enable -every student of art-history to see before him the active life of the -Cis-Himâlâyans, whether as Assyrians, Persians, Medes, or Babylonians, -in clear and distinct outlines. Their knowledge of embossing gold and -silver was considerable. Their household furniture, drinking cups, -tables, candelabra, bracelets, and rings are of strictly _architectural -construction_. We miss that overburdening confusion in ornamentation -which distinguishes the Indian products; and the more correct -treatment of ornamental outlines, especially to be seen in their -mosaics and tesselated pavements, approaches Greek forms. - -The commercial spirit, which swayed this portion of the river-valley of -the Tigris and Euphrates, engendered a powerful activity in a practical -direction. Whilst we build railways--the Babylonians dug canals, -connected the two rivers, and constructed aqueducts. They built palaces -at Nineveh, castles (El Kassr) at Babylon, and an immense nekropolis at -Vurka, about 180 English miles from Bagdad, and about 8 miles to the -east of the Euphrates. At every step in the interior of these ruins -we find clay-coffins piled up to a height of from 15-20 feet. All -these ruins are now covered with saltpetre, small shells and broken -pottery. The remains of the walls are from 12-22 feet thick, partly of -unbaked and partly of baked bricks. The construction everywhere closely -imitates wood-work, and the decoration reproduces textile fabrics such -as carpets and striped tent covers. There are capitals in stucco of the -Ionic and even of the Corinthian type; though the leaves are those of -the palm-tree instead of the Acanthus. The volute of the Ionic capital -is rather in the form of two serpents drinking from a cup, than in the -form of rams' horns. We might call this old Babylonian stucco capital, -the proto-Ionic type. - -On the two shores of the Euphrates, as far as Babylon, coffins of green -glazed clay and small terra-cotta tablets with cuneiform inscriptions -have been found by thousands. These coffins were imitations of -dead bodies, swathed in cloths and tied with cords. In addition -to this reproduction of textile fabrics in clay, we find with the -Cis-Himâlâyans a tendency to overlay wood-carvings with metal coatings. -When they advanced more in metallotechnic they still held to patterns -which clearly had their origin in wood-carvings. The plant-like forms -predominate; then we have the quilloche, palm-leaves, or feathers -arranged in the form of palm-leaves, and the pine-cone, which is often -used in eurythmical variation with the conventionally-treated open or -closed tulips, and open or closed lotus flowers. - -The pictorial art of the Assyrians and Babylonians shows us two -distinct periods--an older and a more recent one. The older works had -a bluish-green ground; the later a light, either whitish or yellowish, -ground. In both styles the outlines are marked strongly in black or -dark red. In the older, the sinews are more rope-like and less correct -in their anatomy. In the more recent style a finer treatment, and a -more correct knowledge of the human frame, may be traced. Wild animals -are reproduced with a keen eye of observation, and a strong tendency to -naturalism. - -Polychromy was known to them, but it is very difficult to decide -whether they coloured in tempera or in fresco, with wax or by some -other means--perhaps even in oil. The incrustation of clay walls with -baked and painted, and even glazed, tiles it is difficult to explain. -In many instances, as at Vurka, each cone has its own colour, and, by a -proper arrangement, squares, imbrications, diapers, and networks were -produced; but at Babylon and Nineveh the tiles show clear marks of -painting. Diodorus (probably after Ktesias) gives us a description of -the interior circular wall of the royal palace at Babylon, and says: -'It was decorated with all sorts of coloured human and animal forms -baked in clay, much resembling nature. The whole represented a hunt. -The figures were more than four yards high. Semiramis was to be seen by -the side of her husband Ninus, she killing a panther, he piercing with -his dart a lion.' The principles of decoration with the Assyrians far -surpass mere ornamentations in geometrical patterns. Dramatic life of -a higher kind is introduced, showing greater artistic power than the -reliefs in stone. The outlines are neither black nor red, the treatment -is tasteful, the colours a tender blue, brown, white or yellow, and the -ground a lightish green. These paintings are not mosaics, as at Vurka. - -The baking and glazing must have taken place in the following manner. -The unbaked tiles were arranged and numbered in a horizontal position -on the ground, then they were painted and placed vertically on the -wall as a tapestry decoration. When the wall was finished it must have -been heated, so as to change the light and fluid colours into a kind of -enamel, giving the clay-wall a thin terra-cotta coating. - -The utilitarian purpose was everything with the Persians, Assyrians, -and Babylonians. This is evident in their furniture, especially in -their tables, chairs, and footstools. The construction of the frame -was taken from plants and trees, whilst wild animals were used as -silent and obedient domestic creatures. In supporting their furniture -with the legs of the lion, tiger, or leopard, they used these animals -for an excellent ornamental purpose. The legs of the brute were -made to support, the body was turned into a seat, and the head was -conventionally used as a side-ornament for the backs or arms of the -throne or chair. We see in the Cis-Himâlâyans, in accordance with their -greater activity in life, a further progress in art. Merely geometrical -figures do not suffice; not monstrous divinities, but animals and men, -are the most important subjects of sculpture. Their architecture was -without symmetry and proportion, the material of their buildings in -no accordance with the monumental tendencies of their construction, -and their efforts did not carry them further than the vague attempts -of half-settled nomads. Their walls, which once consisted of textile -hangings, retained this character, stretching for thousands of feet -without any interruption, except that the doorways had their colossal -symbolic guards, which to a certain extent relieved the monotony of -the construction. The art of Persia and Assyria is in every sense the -transition-link between nomadic and monumental art. - - - - -CHAPTER VI. - -EGYPTIAN ART. - - -'Anything capable of uniting many souls--is _sacred_,' says Goethe. -The sacredness of religious tenets or monumental buildings is at once -explained by this. To unite humanity into one great brotherhood was -first attempted by the Babylonians with their huge tower of Belus, -Baal, or Babel. Men for the first time left patriarchal particularism, -and tried to build a beacon reaching up to the stars, calling humanity -together to one spot, by a work produced by their united labour as a -visible sign of their union. This first attempt at a really monumental -building was made in the plains of the Euphrates. Whilst the people -of Asia still struggled to settle down, and changed their habitations -and with them their forms of art, we see monuments emerge from the dim -past, which reflect man for the first time in his grandeur as wielder -of matter. - -The sphinx in its incomprehensible, mysterious form, half brute, half -human being, may be looked upon as the very emblem of Egyptian art. - -It is written in one of the Hermetic books, 'O Egypt, fables alone will -be thy future history, wholly incredible to later generations, and -nought but the letter of thy stone-engraved monuments will survive.' -Our knowledge of Egypt is scarcely half a century old. It originated -in a black basalt stone, the so-called Rosetta-stone, deposited, at -the beginning of the century, in the British Museum. Approached by Dr. -Young, of Cambridge, with the wand of investigation, this stone poured -forth a little spring, which has now swollen into a mighty river, -carrying off with irresistible force all those little souls who, on -their small boats of prejudice, with tiny chronological ladles, try -to stop the sweeping power of historical truth. We know something -at least of Egypt; we have _monumental_ evidence, which surpasses -all _written documents_, which may be voluntarily or involuntarily -falsified. Egyptologists may be divided into two parties:--the _long_ -and the _short_ chronologists. The _short_ chronologists, in the -face of our advanced knowledge of geology, of the vast accumulation -of pre-historic relics, consisting of flint instruments, pottery, -weavings, and architectural remains (lake and pile-dwellings), deserve -no consideration. They follow the chronological dislocation of Rabbi -_Hillel_, of the first half of the fourth century A.D., with childish -ignorance. This view is the most charitable, as otherwise we should be -driven to accuse them of interested knavery. After the exertions of a -Champollion-Figeac, Böckh, Barucchi, Bunsen, Brugsch, Henry, Lesueur, -Lepsius, Hincks, Kenrick, Uhleman, &c.--who all belong to the _long_ -chronologists, to turn to the short chronology is impossible. - -_Lepsius_ succeeded in tracing Egyptian history, king by king, event -by event, to Alexander the Great, and hence through the XXXIst, -XXXth, XXIXth, XXVIIIth, XXVIIth, XXVIth, XXVth, XXIVth, and XXIIIrd -consecutive Egyptian dynasties, back to Sheshonk Shishak, founder of -the XXIInd dynasty, who conquered Jerusalem 'in the Vth year of King -Rehoboam,' as is hieroglyphically recorded in Karnac. This furnishes -us with a perfect synchronism between Egyptian and Hebrew history up -to 971-3 B.C. From this point we have innumerable Egyptian tablets, -papyri, and genealogical lists, carrying us upward through the XXIst, -XXth, XIXth, and XVIIIth dynasties to Ramses I. (Ramesu) 15th-16th -century B.C. Here we have a short period of anarchy, represented in -the _Disk heresy_, and find sundry royal claimants, at the head of -whom stands Atenra-Bakhan, or Bexen-aten, called by Lepsius 'Amenophis -IV.' From the reign of his father Amenophis III. every king is known, -by means of hieroglyphical inscriptions on stone and papyri, back to -the beginning of the XVIIth Theban dynasty, in the reign of AAHMES I. -(Amosis), about 1671 B.C. Here again we have the mysterious period -of the _Hyksos_ or Shepherd kings, who, according to Manetho, ruled -511 years. Three dynasties may be put down for this period--the -XVIth, XVth, and XIVth. But we again step into the broad daylight -of monumental facts when we reach the XIIIth dynasty, and with it -the 'Old Empire' in the land of KHAM, Ham, the venerable _Chemnus_, -the Sebakhetps and Hepherhetps of the XIIIth dynasty; whilst the -glories of the XIIth blaze forth effulgently, thanks to the critical -investigations of the _Turin Papyrus_ by the immortal Lepsius. - -The XIIth dynasty ends about 2124 B.C. - -Though little is known of the XIth, Xth, IXth, VIIIth, and VIIth -dynasties, the VIth and Vth dynasties stand solid as rocks on the -_Turin_ papyrus, and are thoroughly known in consequence of the -recovery of all the kings, but one, from the tombs opened at Memphis. -The remains of the IVth dynasty surpass belief; those who doubt can -refer to the folio plates, the 'Denkmäler,' by Lepsius, copies of which -are in nearly all our libraries. - -Of the IIIrd, IInd, and Ist dynasties we have no monuments, but -even this unknown age must have been preceded by a long period of -development, till at last MENES is set down as the first Pharaoh of -Egypt about 3892 B.C. according to Lepsius, or 5702 B.C. according -to Böckh; 5613 B.C. according to Unger; Brugsch puts him 4455 B.C.; -Lauth 4157 B.C., and Bunsen 3623 B.C. But before Menes constructed -Memphis; Teni, This, or Thinis, was already a once flourishing and -then decaying town. Menes erected at Memphis a green sanctuary, -ornamented with the figures of men and animals. Memphis (Men-ofer) -means 'the good station.' The king in the times of Menes had already -several titles. He was called the great house--_Per-ao_, Pharaoh; as -we speak of the 'sublime Porte.' The king was to his subjects _nuter_ -(divine), or _neb_ (master). He was addressed by the title of _hon-f_, -corresponding to our 'Your Majesty'; or only by _on_, which would be -our 'Sire.' The Egyptians under Menes had already rewards in the form -of decorations, in _nub_, the golden collar, corresponding to our -'order of the garter.' The court consisted of nobles and attendants. -The nobles were _Sez_, and had to distinguish themselves by wisdom and -learning. The house of the king's children was under a governor, who -was responsible for their health and education. Those belonging to the -highest classes had the title of _erpa_, illustrious, _ha_, chief, or -_set_, your excellency. The affairs of the court were entrusted to -intendants, the _hir-sesta_, the secretary and numerous scribes. The -king 3000 or 5000 years B.C. had a quartermaster-general; a director -of vocal music; a director of amusements; a chief of the chamber of -the robes; a chief hair-dresser; a master of trimming the nails of -H.M., and a superintendent of the baths. Inferior court-officials -were intrusted with the supervision of the granaries, the fruit and -oil-chambers; there were royal purveyors of meat, royal bakers, and -equerries. Architects, who were held in the very highest honour, -because they could marry the daughters of the king, had to inspect the -public works. Judges administered the law, already divided into a civil -and criminal section. The title _hir-sesta_ meant 'he who is above a -secret,' There was a hir-sesta of heaven (the royal astronomer), one -of 'secret words,' a kind of private secretary, who had to compose -important political or social essays; another of grammar. The scribes -again were divided into different classes. They had to transmit orders -from their superiors; to register dry facts; to keep accounts. The very -titles of these court-officials are enough to convince us that at the -time of Menes, Egypt must have already possessed a highly-complicated -and civilised State-organisation. - -The successor of Menes, Atos or Akotus, is recorded to have written -'books on Anatomy,' and constructed the royal palace of Memphis. - -This was the state of Egypt under _Menes_. His name suggests a more -than merely accidental analogy with _Manû_, _Minos_, or _Man_, and -has reference to the time when _man_ became conscious of law, and -assembled into a social bondship. The Egyptians, before a Menes could -have ruled over them, must have gone through the savage and nomadic, -or pastoral stages, and have passed from the palæolithic, neolithic, -and bronze ages of art into that of iron. When did they invent their -_hieroglyphs_, which must first have been _ideographic_ before they -became _phonetic_? From the first-recorded meeting between the -Hebrews, then still nomads, and the Egyptians, it appears that the -latter already then formed a well-organised State-body. As regards -their monuments, we see them enter the mythical age with their grand -stone-constructions, their pyramids, colosses, temples, palaces, -sphinxes, catacombs and obelisks, as a developed artistic nation. All -these stupendous works are constructed for eternity; there is nothing -nomadic in them, though this element here and there shows itself in -colossal petrifactions. Wood-constructions and textile fabrics form -the bases of their ornamentation, but this influence must have taken -effect in antediluvian, nay, even pre-Adamitic, times, when humanity -everywhere else was sunk in a state of unconscious inactivity. The -mound, constructed with geometrical accuracy as a huge pyramid, must -have had an origin somewhere. The construction itself has a purpose. -The crystal form surrounds an inner kernel, around which the stone -shell is laid; it not only serves to point upwards, but also downwards. -Thus mortality and immortality are already blended into one in these -hoary monuments. - -To proclaim the grandeur of the silent inhabitant, once a mighty ruler, -to the four quarters of the globe, was the purpose of these pyramids. - -Natural caves must have suggested their tombs and catacombs. The sacred -Nile with its majestic flow is reflected in the endless horizontal -lines of their temples. The rising peaks of mountains seem to have -suggested their huge pylons. The rays of the sun were transformed by -them into stones, recording, as gigantic obelisks, the deeds of their -kings. When did these obelisks shake off the rough shape of mere -huge monoliths, placed in plains to commemorate some grand event? -To point upwards in isolated forms was the secret tendency of these -half-sculptured, half-architectural marvels. Trees and forests were -turned by the Egyptian artists into hypostyle halls, with innumerable -columns, spreading a mysterious gloom about them. - -The Chinese were practical; the Trans-Himâlâyans metaphysical; the -Cis-Himâlâyans agricultural, commercial and warlike; and the Egyptians -pre-eminently architectural and _monumental_. - -Their whole historical life may be divided into the following -art-periods. - - _(a)_ The Ante-monumental. - _(b)_ The Pyramidal. - _(c)_ The Hieratic. - _(d)_ The Ptolemaic. - -A. These four epochs of art-development resemble layers in the -earth's crust. Whilst with other nations the remnants of art are mere -skeletons, colourless frames of an extinct social organism, with the -Egyptians we have art in all its different phases, with the dried flesh -and the scarcely-faded colours, embalmed like a mummy. Life and death -were with them so closely allied, that we may say, their life was a -continual death, and their death was everlasting life. - -The spiritual conceptions of the Egyptians, which might have served -to enable us to understand their art thoroughly, were lost with their -sacred books, of which, with one exception, we have merely the titles. -Plato considered them 10,000 years old in his time. They consisted of:-- - -1. The _two_ books of the Chanter--like the Vedas and the Zend-Avesta -containing hymns in honour of the gods, and a code of laws like those -of Manû. - -2. The _four_ astronomical books of the Horoskopus; treating of fixed -stars, and of solar and lunar conjunctions, making the sun the centre, -round which we revolve. - -3. The _ten_ books of the Hierogrammatist, or the Sacred Scribe, -treating of the art of writing, which was: hieroglyphic (sacred), -hieratic (a kind of hieroglyphic tachygraphy--short-hand writing, used -by priests only), and enchorial or demotic, used by the people. These -books contained, further, the elements of cosmography and geography; -tablets, on which the high-roads of the earth were marked; astronomical -records, mentioning, according to Diogenes Laertius, 373 solar and -832 lunar eclipses, referring thus to a period of 48,863 years; a -chorography of Egypt, and the delineation of the course of the sacred -Nile; an inventory of each temple, of the landed property of the -priests, and a treatise on weights and measures. - -4. The _ten_ ceremonial books of the Stolists, which were entirely -devoted to religious worship, containing the ordinances as to '_the -first-fruits, and the sacrificial stamp, sacrifices, prayers, -processions_,' and the like. No human sacrifices were offered up from -at least 3000 years B.C. - -5. The _ten_ books of the prophets, consisting of thirty-six sections, -called the hieratic writings, with which the prophets, the first -order of the priests, were entrusted. A description of the deities, -regulations for the education of the priests, and general laws formed -their contents. - -The oldest books of law, were attributed to _Hermes_ (Toth), implying, -that the first germ of an hierarchical organisation of society sprung -from the sacred songs, and that law was entirely based upon the -religious conceptions of the secret forces of nature by which man -had been impressed. Like the Code of Manû, which took its origin in -the Vedas, or the Laws of Zoroaster based on the Zend-Avesta, or the -injunctions of Confucius founded on the holy records and songs of -by-gone ages, the Egyptian laws took their origin in the first poetical -feelings of awakened humanity, excited by the mysteries of nature under -the rule of an incomprehensible first cause. - -6. The _six_ books of the Dead. The only books still extant, written -in hieroglyphs, and divided by Lepsius into 165 sections. The first -fifteen chapters form a distinct and connected whole, with the -superscription: 'Here begin the Sections of the glorification in the -Light of Osiris.' - -It concludes with a book entitled 'The Book of Deliverance in the Hall -of the _twofold_ Justice (Reward and Punishment), and the Book of -Redemption.' - -With such a deep and mystic literature, encompassing the gods, nature, -and man, in life and death, it is no wonder that a mystic and symbolic -art should have succeeded in Egypt. - -Their mythology was not less profound than that of the -Trans-Himâlâyans; there was more of symmetry, at least architectural -symmetry, in their conceptions and representations than in those of the -Brahmans, though Egyptian priests and Brahmans have apparently taken -their conceptions from one and the same source. The Egyptian had eight -gods of the first order, twelve gods of the second, and seven gods of -the third order, pointing by these very numbers to an astronomical -basis, thus:-- - -1. The cosmical forces of creative nature. - -2. The twelve months of the year. - -3. The seven days of the week. - -Astronomy is the first powerful divisor of time and the supreme lord -of agriculture. Only when the 'Sacred Nile' deposited its fructifying -alluvium on the barren limestone of the valleys, formed by the Libyan -and Arabian mountain ranges, man could exist and develop in that -region. The regular inundation appeared to have taken place under the -influence of the sun, moon, and stars. The sun (Osiris) was, therefore, -believed to call forth the Nile (Isis) from regions _unknown down to -our own days_, and sun and water became, as with the Indians (_Indra -and Agni_), the first visible, creative forces of nature. - -The eight gods of the first order were:-- - -I. AMN (Brahm), Am-Ra, Ammon, the Greek Zeus (the son of Kronos and -Rhea), the Roman Jupiter; the 'Concealed God,' the 'Lord of Heaven,' -the 'Lord of Thrones'; the first creative, incomprehensible, invisible -force of the universe. The Brahma of the Indians, the Zeruane-Akerene -of the Persians. - -II. KHEM (Kama), the generative God of Nature, Brahma. He was -worshipped, under the _second Thinite Dynasty_, under the symbol of the -goat. The primitive, _active_, or male element of nature. - -III. MUT ({maîa}, matter, Demeter, Leto, Latona, Bhavani), the -primitive, _passive_, or female element of nature. - -IV. NUM (Nu, Kneph, ChNUbis, the Indian VischNU, Noah, Neptun). -In Arabic _nef_ means to breathe. The breath of the universe when -condensed--'water;' the creative spirit, the {Agathodaimôn}; the -{pneûma} (the wind, the air) of the Greeks. - -V. SETI (in Koptic Sate), the ray, the arrow; at a later period -the frog-headed goddess, the consort of Kneph; the sun-beam, the -fructifying heat in union with water (cosmical moisture), producing the -inner force of creation. - -VI. PHTAH (Ptah, Phthah, S'iva, Vulcan), the creator of the world, -which sprang from the mouth of Kneph, meaning at his bidding. His -symbol became at a later period the scarabæus. The more numerous this -animal was in the Nile valley after the subsidence of the inundation, -the more fruitful was the year. Phtah was in reality telluric heat. - -VII. NET (Neith, Athene, Pallas, Minerva, Doorga), the bright goddess -of intellectual power, wisdom, knowledge, virtue, passionless -happiness. Isis was her substitute. Her temple at Saïs had no roof, but -was vaulted over by the sunny or starry canopy of heaven, and bore the -mysterious inscription: 'I am all that was, and is, and is to be; no -mortal has lifted up my veil, and the fruit I bore is Helios.' Past, -present, and future, are mysteriously entwined in the conception of -intellect, pervading and ruling the universe. - -VIII. RA (Helios, Apollo, Adonis, Adonaïs, the Lord, Baal, Mithras, -Moloch, Teotl, Toth, Hermes, Odin, Thor, Atys, Janus, Kekrops, -Endymion, &c.), the sun, the reflected light (with the Cabalists -_Hachoser_, in opposition to the expanding light, _Hajashor_). - -The representations of these divinities were not monstrous, like -those of the Indians; the human form predominates, but the _symbolic_ -is still the most important element. The outward form has an inward, -secret meaning. 'Meaning' and 'meant' are still in wild conflict. The -sublime forces of the deity were to be hewn in stone, or given in -outlines, or painted; the result was a grotesque product of art, and as -such a complete failure. - -The twelve gods of the second order were the children of four of the -gods of the first order. - -I. AMN had only one son, Khunsu (Chous, Chaos, the prototype of -Herkules). - -II. KNEPH had also only one son, Teth (Toth, Thoth, Hermes), who taught -men to write and to read. - -III. PHTAH had two children, Atumu (Atum, Atmu), and Pecht, the -cat-headed goddess of Bubastis (the Greek Artemis or Diana). - -IV. RA had eight children, Hat-her (Athyr, Athor, Aphrodite); Mau -(Jao); Ma (Truth); Tefun (the lion-headed goddess); Muntu (Mant); Sebak -(Sebek), the crocodile-headed god; Seb (Kronos), and Nutpe (Rhea). - -The seven gods of the third order, emanations from those of the second, -as these were emanations from those of the first, were:-- - -1. Set, Nubi, or Typhon, celebrated for his struggle with Horus, the -son of Osiris, in the infernal regions. (See what is said of Krishna, -p. 70.) - -2. Hesiri, Osiris (also the solar year), HSR. - -3. Hes or Isis, HS, the Nile, the moon (the lunar year). - -4. Nebt-hi or Nephthys, the sister of Isis; sister and wife of Typhon. - -5. Her-Her (Aroëris, Arueris). - -6. Her (Horus, the child of Osiris and Isis, Harpokrates), who, with -Isis and Osiris, formed the great, incomprehensible, mystic trinity of -the Egyptians, of which we have the following record:-- - -OSIRIS was the father, husband, brother, and son of ISIS. - -ISIS was the mother, wife, sister, and daughter of OSIRIS. - -HORUS was the brother and son of Osiris and Isis, and was OSIRIS -himself. - -7. Anubis (Anupo) the dog-star. - -Who does not understand at once that, out of these half-astronomical, -half-cosmogonical conceptions, a religion and art full of mysticism, -blending into one _Fetishism_, _Astrology_, and _Anthropomorphism_, -must have grown? Only through a careful study of Egyptian mythology are -we enabled to comprehend that gigantic power which urged the people to -construct those temples and palaces, those labyrinths and catacombs, -as mystic in themselves, as the hidden powers of nature. The masses in -Egypt were kept in a degraded state of passive obedience; they were -overawed by metaphysical subtleties, and by huge stone monsters, which -filled them with horror, and made them subservient to the dictates of -a gloomy priesthood. Religion and art, both supported by a vast store -of natural science, were the exclusive property of the priests, of -whom the Pharaoh was the merely _tolerated_ head, a kind of stone idol -in the flesh. Egyptian art was an echo of priestly caprices, which, -wrapt in symbolism, had a powerful hold on the untutored minds of the -people. Careful investigations have proved that these priests were of a -different race to the aborigines; their mythological analogies point to -immigrated Brahmans, who brought some religious notions with them from -the Ganges, and transferred them to the Nile. - -Egyptian art reflects in every form the gorgeous influences of -religion. The whole life of every Egyptian was placed, in seven phases, -under the protection of seven divinities. The _first_ period of man's -life was under the influence of _Isis_, the moon (Luna, Selene). The -_second_ was devoted to _Hermes_; during this period man had to learn -to read and to write, to play the harp, to dance, to develop the -body in the gymnasium, and to make himself well versed in knowledge -according to his station in life; but the only station that granted -man an insight into knowledge was that of the _priest_. During the -_third_ period man was under the care of _Hat-her_ (Athyr), or Venus. -Love was to rule the youth; the world was to appear to him in the -rosy hue of a mystic foam of incomprehensible longing. The _fourth_ -period was under the dominion of _Ra_ (Helios); when love had ceased -to disturb the mind, and to fill this world with illusions, the light -of truth and earnest activity was to ripen man, and to prepare him for -the _fifth_ period, under the protection of _Man_ or Mars, the God of -War; man was to learn either to conquer others, or to conquer his own -passions, and to work in the State as a useful member. Few only reached -the _sixth_ period, guided by _Amn_, the supreme representative of -abstract wisdom; during this period man was admitted to act as a judge, -to sit at the board of a hierarchical council, or to teach priests -as high-priest. At last man became, during the _seventh_ period, -vapour--breath--air--under the dominion of _Num_ (Kneph), and was -detached from reality; if good, transferred into a state of ideality; -if not, doomed to begin life anew as a loathsome animal, till he atoned -for his evil deeds, and, purified, reached the bright abode of Osiris. - -B. The _pyramidal period_, the most ancient of Egyptian art, is the -outgrowth of these mystic religious conceptions. Nature was to be -reproduced, and surpassed in her sublime grandeur. The mountain was -brought into a geometrical shape. - -The three principal pyramids were built during the reign of the fourth -dynasty, 3426 B.C.-3220 B.C.; the first, by Shufu (Cheops), was, in -extent, 13 acres 1 rood and 22 perches, more than twice the area of St. -Peter's at Rome. The original quantity of masonry was 89,028,000 cubic -feet. Total height 480 feet; 16 feet higher than St. Peter's, and 120 -feet higher than St. Paul's (London); 360,000 human beings worked at it -for twenty years. The stones are from 9 to 12 feet in length, and 6½ -to 8 feet in breadth. The second pyramid was smaller, built by Shafra -(Chephren), only 454 feet high; and the third by Menkare (Mykerinus), -218 feet high. The mode of fitting the polished stones together is a -perfect master-piece of architectural construction. - -Osiris was to be worshipped in all halls of festival, in all creation, -in all places. Temples were erected in honour of the gods, which were -approached through avenues of sphinxes. These sphinxes were of six -different kinds. 1. The pure lion (symbol of Amn). 2. The lion with -the ram's head (Krio-sphinx--symbol of Khem or Amn). 3. The lion with -hawk's head (symbol of Ra). 4. The lion with a male human head (the -symbol of Osiris or Horus). 5. The lion with a female human head (the -symbol of Mut or Isis). 6. The lion's half-body and legs, with female -human head and arms, as in the reliefs of Karnack, and on the Campesian -obelisk (probably the symbol of Net). - -The tombs were, more or less deeply, hewn into rocks. They generally -begin with a small sanctuary, from which an inclined passage leads -down into the sepulchral chamber. The decoration is an imitation of -wooden trellis-work in very gay colours. The threshold also distinctly -bears the traces of a primitive wood construction; a round, trunk-like -beam generally unites the two door-posts, and even the ceilings of the -apartments are repeatedly made in imitation of wooden boards fastened -together. The pillars are square, and united either by a rectangular -architrave or by circular beams. - -The temples point, by their forms, to a civilisation which took its -course from south to north. This bears out the theory that Meroe was -once the seat of a colony of priests, who spread religion, and with -it science and art, from Upper into Lower Egypt. Thebes appears to -have been the most ancient seat of the Egyptian Pharaohs, one of the -first of whom was perhaps Osiris, though he has been placed amongst -the gods, and was said to have been, like Krishna, an incarnation of -the Supreme Being, who revealed himself in love and kindness, and was -to put an end to the dominion of Typhon, the Eternal Evil. Might not -this myth conceal some historical fact--the advent of a wise hero, who -conquers a wild and reckless tyrant? For Osiris had to go through all -the sufferings of humanity, and even to suffer death, so as to become -the saviour, the deliverer of his people; and then only was he able -to turn the earth into a powerful kingdom. By _Earth_, we may assume, -Upper Egypt was meant, where the god-man Osiris presided, who, in spite -of his having become man, and belonging to the third order of the -gods, was placed on an equality with the gods of the first order. The -temple or tomb of Ipsambul may be considered the very oldest rock-hewn -construction; it has a figure of Osiris twenty feet high over the -entrance door. We pass over the remains of Philæ, Elephantine, and -Edfou, and come to those of Karnac and Luxor, the venerable Thebes, -which, in the fifth century B.C., during the times of Herodotus, were -already in a state of dilapidation. - -Upon extensive brick terraces, raised high above the flat banks of the -Nile, the Egyptian temple stood, a strictly secluded building. Strong -walls, rising in pyramidal form, crowned with an overhanging fluted -cornice, gave the mural enclosure a mysterious and stern character. No -opening for windows, no colonnade interrupted the monotonous flatness, -which is covered, as by one long tapestry, with hieroglyphs, and -representations of gods and Pharaohs. The entrance to these buildings, -like that of the temple of Edfou, was placed between two tower-like -structures called propylæa, the walls of which were decorated with -sculptured figures--in three or more rows. Then followed a court, -surrounded by pillars, placed at a distance from the walls on both -sides, roofed over with stone, and forming a gallery. Thence we reach -the pronaos or portico, after which we enter the cell, divided into -the naos and adytum. The naos was generally a kind of hypostyle hall, -with a flat roof raised in the middle. The pillars and columns had a -variety of capitals, but these were generally of one pattern throughout -the temple. The quadrilateral Isis-headed capital, as at Denderah, -was often used. The monuments of the 'hundred-gated' Thebes are the -best school for the study of genuine Egyptian art. The temples on the -eastern side of the river are symbolical of the dawn of life; on the -western side we find tombs, catacombs, and Memnoniums. At Karnac we -have one of the grandest constructions of the world in the ruins of -the hypostyle hall, with its gigantic stone ceiling supported by 134 -columns, of which the twelve middle ones, about 65 feet high and 11 -feet in diameter, are larger and taller than the others, supporting a -loftier central nave. The width of this hall is 338 feet, the depth -170½ feet, and the area 57,629 feet, or about five times as large as -the church of St. Martin-in-the-Fields in London. Columns and walls -are completely covered with sculptured forms of deities; Osiris -predominates. Pylons, propylæa, obelisks, colossal statues of red, -grey, and black granite cover the courts; chapel-like apartments, -connected and unconnected, are strangely intermingled. - -Next to the temples we must mention one of the most gorgeous buildings, -the _Labyrinth_, containing between three and four thousand chambers -in rows, facing inwards the winding alleys, which ascended in a spiral -line to the middle, and descended from it in the same way. It has -been minutely described by Herodotus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny, and -Ezekiel. The building was to be a strict architectural imitation of the -planetary system. The inner 1,500 chambers were divided into twelve -courtyards, corresponding to the twelve signs of the zodiac, six of -which were towards the north, and six towards the south. - -The Memnons were monolith statues of imposing size, symbolic of -the rising sun--of Horus or Osiris. Homer mentions Memnon, for his -remarkable beauty, as the son of the east. Diodorus speaks of him -as Tithonus, a general, sent out to aid Priamus of Troy against the -besieging Greeks. - -The walls of temples, palaces, tombs, and catacombs were partly -decorated with reliefs _en creux_, and partly with tapestry-like -patterns, using geometrical figures, sometimes, though rarely, -intermixed with plants, or plants treated with conventional stiffness. -The walls with the Egyptians had a different purpose than merely to -encircle or to enclose; they served as huge blackboards of stone, on -which the priests wrote their mystic records. The superfluous thickness -of the walls suggests that they were once made of brick, like those -of Nineveh or Babylon, and, further, the overlaying of these immense -granite blocks with stucco, serves to bear out this supposition. The -walls of the enclosures of temples and the sarcophagi were covered -with hieroglyphs or scenes from life, both on the inside and outside; -tombs and catacombs were decorated on the inside only. These scenes -are framed in with borders, reminding us of the broad seams in woven -stuffs. In temples the scenes refer to burial rituals, or the judgment -of the dead; in palaces to hunts and conquests of the kings. We see the -Asian and African conquests of Ramses II. represented on the walls of -Ipsambul (Aboosimbal in Nubia) in bright-coloured pictures. The king -brandishes a pole-axe over the heads of Negroes, Hebrews, and Aryans, -that is, over one mixed and two pure groups of mankind. Above his head -runs the hieroglyphic scroll: 'The beneficent living God, guardian of -glory, smites the South; puts to flight the East; rules by victory, -and drags to his country all the earth, and all foreign lands.' High -officials and private persons ornamented the walls of their houses -and tombs with scenes of every-day occurrences. We may study in these -their whole domestic and public life, their customs and manners, their -amusements and toils. The ceilings of the chambers are not covered -with _symbolic_ pictures, but generally with patterns of conventional -wall-decorations. In temples they are sometimes decorated with zodiacs, -as at Denderah--the best-preserved Egyptian temple, of which, however, -the date is doubtful. - -C. The _hieratic style_ of the Pharaohs substituted a greater amount of -very tasteful symbolic ornamentation. - -The Hathor-masks, the names of kings in cartouches, the viper as a -symbol of divine or royal power; serpents, scarabæi, winged globes, -either symbolic of the sun, the moon, or the earth, formed the -principal elements of the innumerable variety of severe ornamentation. -In addition to these the following were used:-- - -1. The papyrus, as the symbol of bodily and intellectual food. - -2. The lotus, as a symbol of the creative mysteries of the universe. - -3. The palm-tree, with its graceful and simple form, served as the -prototype of their columns, the capitals of which were either open or -closed lotus-buds or flowers. - -4. Lastly, the feather ornament, as the emblem of sovereignty. - -The columns during the _pyramidal_, or old style expressed with -distinct clearness their purpose to serve as a support; in the -_hieratic_, or new style this purpose is detached from the outer form -of the column, which no longer has to support, but merely to serve -as an ornament, or to proclaim some mysterious tenet in symbolic -types. The face of Isis is to look to the four quarters of the globe; -the closed or open lotus to symbolise the mystery of creation, the -fountain of life, the cup of plenty, and the fount of all blessings. -In this treatment they went so far as to imitate the very dew-drops -on the lotus, in granite. A strict naturalism was the foundation of -all Egyptian conventionalism, and in many instances they succeeded in -producing perfectly astonishing effects. In their columns we recognise -the very plant which must have suggested the forms. When made circular -and of granite, these columns still retained the triangular shape of -the papyrus by means of three raised lines on the round surface. At a -later period they were fluted, and apparently tied together under the -capital with a strap, cord, or band of a broad fibrous substance; the -capital above rose in four divisions in the form of a closed lotus. -In the hieratic style the fluting of the columns disappears--they -are smooth, round, and covered with hieroglyphs, but the base still -discloses the plant origin, disguised in an ornament of palm or reed -leaves. Characteristic in these columns is the expression of tension -in the swelling shaft, which was probably an unconscious imitation of -wood-construction; the heavy cross-beams pressing on the thin posts -produced this effect, which has been slavishly copied in stone. With -the Greeks this swelling of the column became one of the elements of -its beauty, because with them it was an abstraction of symmetrical -proportion, consciously done, to express the conflicting powers of -pressure and resistance. With a proud obstinacy the Egyptians, during -their hieratic period, insisted on separating the ornamental from the -architectural part of the building, so that no organic connection -existed between sculpture and architecture. This is most striking -in those colossal sitting figures which are placed in the front and -at the back of propylæa, or before the walls of pylons. It is a -clear separation of matter and spirit, of purpose and form, which is -altogether contrary to the fundamental principles of good architecture. - -Art with the Egyptians was thoroughly _polychromatic_; they tinted -granite, of whatever colour, with a red pigment, so that the stone -might have its proper divine colour, hallowed by the priests. They -coloured in flat tints, and used no shading or shadow; they had, -however, no difficulty in conveying to the mind the original forms -which they intended to copy. _Priestly canons_ regulated the size, -form, colour, and expression of every statue, and every attribute -had its prescribed form, the meaning of which was concealed from the -artist, turning him into a mere unconscious machine, a tool in priestly -hands. This is the reason why their works of art look monotonous, -and everything with them is impressed by the crushing influence of -over-regulation. The Typhonic blast of uniformity killed every higher -aspiration in the artist. The human figure had to consist of nineteen -units; the _second finger was that unit_. Squares of this unit were -drawn on the flat, and according to these measurements the human figure -was constructed with geometrical accuracy, looking as flat as possible. -Dreary deserts of religious prejudices, gloomy superstitions, and -childish formalities hindered all progress, and marked their sculpture -and ornamentation with fixed, stereotyped stiffness, until the last -period of their art. - -D. The _Ptolemaic_ style began to develop a little more life and taste. -The statues did not look as if cast in a general mould; the gods were -allowed to have their feet asunder, the one in advance of the other, -which gave them some appearance of motion. How taste may be degraded -by prejudice and custom, can be seen in the fact, that when this -innovation in Egyptian art was settled by a general law of the Pharaoh, -with the connivance of the high ceremonial courts, the masses, on -seeing their gods with legs apart, as if ready to walk, rushed from all -sides with strong ropes, and tied the divinities to their pedestals, -horrified at the possibility of their leaving the country altogether. -And the gods did leave the country. Anything based on superstition -or prejudice, anything having for its vivifying element symbolism or -mysticism, must die away in time. - -What we said of Indian art holds good of Egyptian forms. Take away -from the Uræus, the lotus, papyrus, palm, crocodile, cat, and bull -their symbolic meaning, and these elements of ornamentation lose their -vitality. The Greeks, and more especially the Romans, have shown us how -we may use some of their patterns to advantage: how an entrance hall -may be decorated with silent and mournful-looking sphinxes, and what -an unsurpassed charm there is in the obelisk, directing the thought -upwards. A pyramid still remains one of the finest monuments for one -who has filled the four quarters of the globe with his fame. - -In their every-day ornaments, rings, bracelets, necklaces, head-dresses -and furniture, the architectural straight lines prevail; variety is -not much required, the forms as well as the patterns must be the -same. Just as we reproduce horse-shoe upon horse-shoe because they -bring 'luck,' the Egyptian jeweller reproduced the scarabæus, and -the Turin Museum has not less than 180 different kinds of scarabæi. -In their architecture they suffered from one great evil--from a -horror of symmetry. Their grand palaces or temples have no ruling -element; everything is out of proportion, and though in their detailed -ornamentation they were symmetrical, and even eurythmical--the -harmony of purpose is often wanting. The thought of building for -eternity, however, is always present, whilst no one can deny that -in our buildings the ninety years' lease is to be traced in every -corner. The Egyptians tried to represent the forms of monumental -architecture, and they certainly succeeded in reaching the sublime, -but they did this in neglecting the beautiful. Their symmetrophobia, -which many of our architects imitate only too successfully, spoilt -everything. Their weavings were excellent; their wood-constructions, -as far as furniture was concerned, faultless; music was known to them; -they worked gold, and ornamented it in the so-called 'champ-levé' -manner, and were acquainted with enamel 'cloisonné.' They also fixed -thin layers of gold thread on metal, and filled the remaining spaces -with enamel of different colours, which method the ancients called -'encaustum.' Notwithstanding all these advantages Egyptian art never -reached the ideal of beauty; it has only the charm of the _mysterious_ -for us. To keep this sentiment alive is the duty of any modern artist -who wishes to work in the Egyptian style. He must try to convey -some mystic cosmogonical or incomprehensible religious thought in -diapers, and floral ornament, or in the use of animals or the human -frame in outlines, he must place his ideas and forms under a strict -linear canon. He may then succeed in reproducing the artistic forms -of a nation, during a period, in which humanity did not go beyond -the hierarchical in religion, and the practical in art; during which -mankind struggled to find forms, but was prevented from the freer -exercise of its innate artistic force by the dictates of a despotic -priesthood, and was tied with merciless tyranny to monotonous canons, -crushing under the weight of symbolism and mysticism every higher -artistic aspiration. - - - - -CHAPTER VII. - -HEBREW ART. - - -Little, or rather nothing, can properly be said of Hebrew art, for it -is a non-entity. The Hebrews are a mixed race. They assert themselves -to be of the Semitic group of mankind, but ethnologically they are a -composition of black, yellow, and white men, and are closely related -to the Arabs and Phoenicians. They were generally slaves. For 450 -years they were in bondage in Egypt, whence they first emerged into a -national existence. From Moses to Saul, for 450 years, they lived under -a kind of theocratic democracy: God, the supreme ruler in heaven, and -the Jews on earth his _chosen_ people. For another 450 years they had a -kind of theocratic monarchy: God ruled in heaven, as the king ruled on -earth. This period lasted from Saul to Zedekiah, and gives us-- - -(a) A period of 100 years under the first three kings, when -the twelve tribes were yet united; and - -(b) Another period during which they formed two separate -kingdoms. Of these - -(_a_) Israel, in this condition, lasted 220 years under twenty kings, -who ruled at Samaria, and was destroyed by the Assyrians. - -(_b_) Judæa, as a separate State, existed 350 years under twenty-one -kings, and was annihilated by the Babylonians. - -Not less than 650 years intervened between the destruction of Jerusalem -and its second destruction by the Romans. During this period the chosen -people were - -1. 200 years under Persian sway. - -2. 170 years under the dominion of Alexander the Great and his -successors. - -3. 130 years they enjoyed a certain independence under the Maccabees. - -4. 100 years they were ruled by the Herodes and Romans. After the -second destruction of Jerusalem the Jews ceased to have an independent -State of their own, and were scattered all over the earth. They in -reality enjoyed only 550 years of freedom, as a grand and united -nation, out of a period of not less than 6,000 historically-known years. - -Intellect came to absolute consciousness for the first time amongst -the Jews, and in this their historical importance and weight lie. Man, -created in the image of God, lost his state of innocence, absolute -contentment and immortality, by eating of the tree of knowledge. The -Jews were the first to recognise in a higher sense the double nature -of man--his godhead and his animal nature. The country in which they -developed is a perfect geological marvel. The region in which they -settled was divided by a river and a sea. This sea is 1,400 feet -below the level of the Mediterranean. The river flows downwards, like -the Stygian river, far beneath the level of the ocean. The banks of -the Jordan and the lake Asphaltites are the lowest regions of the -habitable globe. In the west the Jews found some fertile plains, but -they never could obtain full and peaceful possession of them, nor of -the sea-coast. They were shut out from the world in a mountainous -region as in a gloomy Puritan chapel, and had ample leisure for -self-contemplation, and for attempting to solve the riddle of man's -destiny with the help of Egyptian wisdom, Persian, Assyrian and -Babylonian theories. Rocks and sand formed the foreground of their -earthly existence; the background was made up by a gloomy river and a -still gloomier sea--the sea of death, the Acherusian, the Plutonian -lake. A sea too low, too mephitic and poisonous for art to exist round -it. A region of sorrow, sinfulness, and abject wretchedness cannot -be the abode of art and science. The fine art of the Jews was like a -migratory bird in its passage over the sea of death. - -Not only with the Jews, but also with the Egyptians, Persians, and -early Greeks, to represent a god in the likeness of man was considered -sinful. The Persians abhorred idols in any shape. The Egyptians gave -their gods shape and form, but a merely symbolic form, expressing in -concrete signs some higher abstract conception. The human head, the -body of a beast or fish, the horns of a ram, or the ears of a cow; the -human leg with the foot of a goat, or the human arm with the claws of a -bird of prey, were sacred, because symbolical. They had a metaphysical -theology written in hieroglyphs. All this was prohibited with the Jews. -They allowed some exceptions, and borrowed the figures of the cherubim -from the Assyrians, the oxen of the temple from the Egyptians, and the -sculptured lions of Solomon's palace from the Persians; their artists -were foreigners, and the imitation of these works was ever after -forbidden. - -'All those things,' says Rabbi Manasseh Ben Israel, one of their most -learned commentators, 'which are esteemed holy in the presence of -God, or idea of man, may not be imitated in any known form or shape, -although made without the intention of adoring them, so as to preclude -the possibility of their being worshipped or deified hereafter. Thus -the figure of the divine chariot, which Ezekiel saw, may not be made, -nor the likeness of angels of any degree, nor of man, for these -creatures are all superior from being made in the image of God.' ... -The prohibition is further applied by him to everything appertaining to -the holy temple, and no house or palace could be built of its size or -proportions. - -Poetry and music were exempt from this enactment. The importance -and influence of the social and religious condition on the -development of art may best be studied in the Jews. They had no great -architects, sculptors or painters, no inventors, no philosophers in -natural science, but many excellent poets, theologians, cabalists, -necromancers, philologists and composers. In our times, however, -influenced by the vivifying spirit of Christianity, they count amongst -themselves, in addition to an inordinate number of picture-dealers, -some creditable painters. - -They possessed legitimately only _one_ temple. Their first temple was -a portable tent. The second was almost entirely of cedar-wood, richly -provided with metallic ornaments, made by artists from Tyre and Sidon. -They possessed one palace, that of Solomon. Babylonian or Assyrian -architecture was probably reflected in this, and we may thus form a dim -idea of what Solomon's palace must have been. First the temple, then -the palace was constructed. - -The fact that the first temple was a mere tent, shows at once the -nomadic character of the Jews, at a period when the Egyptians had -possessed their architectural marvels for thousands of years. To the -student of history, architecture is a sure measure of the degree of -artistic and social development of a nation. We may boldly say, show -us the plans of the houses, palaces, and temples of any nation, and we -can determine the degree of its civilisation; we can do even more, we -can read its character and religious fervour in these wood, brick, -or stone records. That the Jews, having been compelled to witness all -the misery and superstitious dulness which the Egyptian hierarchy and -theocracy produced, should have detested architecture, and looked upon -sculpture or any stone and brick as a curse to humanity, was quite -natural; and that, once escaped from the bondage of Egypt, they should -have hated any monumental, architectural, or artistic sculptural -attempt, is equally obvious. - -The egotistical character of the nomadic trader may be traced in the -architectural constructions of the Jews. Any nation that loves its -god or gods with zeal and self-denial will be sure to build grand -temples to his or their glorification. The Persians had no temples, -because they spiritualised the divine conception to such a degree, -that they thought the first cause present everywhere like light. The -Jews borrowed the same idea, and yet to fix the Eternal Spirit visibly -amongst themselves, they assigned him a permanent abode, where he was -exclusively to dwell; to be near them and to watch over them. Religious -egotism was the mainspring of their national existence, and this -general egotism made every individual Jew an egotist; and egotists are -always bad supporters of anything by which the masses generally may -benefit. Such people look only to the satisfaction of their momentary -wants; they will collect trinkets, earrings, bracelets, armlets, -goblets, gold and silver vessels, but the divine art of architecture, -which binds masses together, will be neglected. We see them at first -contented with a mere tent, and, when they undertook to construct a -lasting building, it was done with all the pomp and gaudiness of a -_parvenu_; they borrowed from all the surrounding rich people anything -they could lay hands upon, merely to be able to say, without reason or -taste--'Look, my special God has also his special house.' In the most -powerful period of their national existence, which was a very short -one, the Jews roused themselves to the construction of at least _one_ -temple to their Javeh. They wished at last to possess an Akropolis like -the Egyptians, who had so many, or the Greeks, Persians, Assyrians and -Babylonians. Their God was at last to be housed, like the gods of the -despised Gentiles. - -The temple of Solomon has been much written upon. Prejudice, religious -fanaticism, blind faith, and unconscious or _voluntary_ ignorance, -dictated the descriptions and guided the reconstructions. Michaelis, -one of the greatest Jewish authorities on Scriptural matters, tells us -that 'all the representations which we possess of the temple of Solomon -are ornamented with arbitrary forms, and if we ask for authority or -proof of this or that ornamental form, we invariably receive the -answer: It must have been so, for I would have built in this way.' It -is naturally very difficult to obtain a correct description of the -temple of Solomon, for with regard to its construction we must rely -on the records of the Jews themselves. Unfortunately the Books of the -Kings, Chronicles, Ezekiel, and the writings of Josephus, the varying -descriptions of the translators, and the host of commentators, who -generally obscure the simplicity of the simplest subject, are all at -variance. - -We may divide Jewish history into the eight following periods. - -During the _first_ period we find them as nomads on the shores of the -Euphrates and Tigris. - -During the _second_ period they were received as shepherds in Egypt -Here they learnt for the first time the arts of a settled people. They -found a mighty hierarchy already established; astronomy, chemistry, -architecture, and sculpture were practised by priests, who were -well-versed theologians, lawyers, physicians, and philosophers. Not -only the Jews, who lived amongst the Egyptians, but also the wisest and -most learned men of Greece, owed much to the land of hidden wisdom, -which was undoubtedly the cradle of the Jewish faith and of Greek -philosophy. Moses, Lykurgus, and Solon sat piously listening to the -oracular instructions of the Egyptian priests, who taught in mystic -symbols. Thales, Pythagoras and Plato borrowed their philosophical -theories and systems largely from the Egyptians. The Egyptians worked -out the incarnation theory with mystic refinement. Osiris, the -concealed Lord of heaven, had to become flesh, to conquer evil. He -condescended to become a redeemer--had to suffer a cruel death in order -to paralyse the influences of Typhon. The Greeks and Jews never could -grasp the mystery of a god changing his almighty subjectivity into an -objective human form, in order to attain, through suffering and death, -what he could have fulfilled in a thousand other ways. Osiris was -not only the supreme ruler in heaven, but he was also the supremely -just and inexorable judge in hell. The division of the universe into -an abode of bliss for the departed just, and of eternal darkness and -fire for the unjust, was an Indian, Persian, and Egyptian dogma. To -the blessed it was promised that they should pluck the sweetest fruits -in heaven, 'for they have given food to the hungry, and water to the -thirsty; they clothed the naked, and lived in truth; for their heart -was with God and God was with them, and they will enjoy eternal life in -his presence,' Of the wicked, on the contrary, it was said: 'that they -could not see the countenance of the Lord of heaven, nor ever hear his -voice; they would go about without heads, drag after them their hearts, -be boiled for ever in a cauldron, be hanged for ever by their legs.' - -From these metaphysical and mystic Egyptians, the immortal Jewish -lawgiver borrowed the division of his nation into twelve tribes, in -imitation of the twelve zodiacal signs, and the division of Egypt into -twelve nomes. In Egypt he learnt to distinguish between clean and -unclean animals; to practise circumcision, which was with the Egyptians -confined to their priests; but Moses promised to make his compatriots -'a nation of priests.' He established the tribe of the Levites, in -imitation of the Egyptian priest-caste; and regulated their income, -mode of living, and duties according to the ten books of the prophets -(see p. 112); he divided the priests into four different classes, which -at a later period were called _Peshat_, exegists, _Remes_, expounders -of dubious points, _Derush_, composers of homilies, and _Sod_, the -hierophants, or those versed in the real mysteries. The initials of the -four names are taken from the Persian word PRDS (paradise) which may be -adduced to prove that what Moses originally instituted was worked out, -and systematised, at a later period, under Persian influence. The whole -arrangement of the tabernacle was Egyptian; the serpent-worship was -Egyptian, and so was the idolatrous predilection for the golden calf. -Moses in his wise gratitude forbade the Jews ever to be hostile to the -Egyptians. - -During the _third_ period they left Egypt, and though they were -acquainted with all the smaller arts of their Egyptian task-masters, -and knew how to weave, to cut stones, to model, to cast, and to found -gold and silver, they had to seek and to gain by hard fighting a new -home to settle in. During this period they forgot everything; their -accomplishments were gone when they settled in the Holy Land. For -during times of war the growth of sciences and arts was never fostered. - -During the _fourth_ period they reached the very climax of their -national glory. David became master of a large empire which extended -from the shores of the Euphrates to the frontiers of Egypt; this -expansion was accomplished by the force of arms. His successor Solomon -administered and consolidated the empire, founded on blood and iron, -by wisdom and the culture of the arts of peace. After a Cæsar, the -Jews had an Augustus. Solomon lived in friendship and peace with the -surrounding mighty kingdoms, especially with Hiram, King of Tyre. It -was Solomon who began to build Tadmor (afterwards Palmyra, the queen of -the East), to establish in the desert a common emporium for Phoenician -wares, and to enable the Jews to trade with them. - -During the _fifth_ period the vast empire was divided into two parts, -the one of which was altogether annihilated, and the other fell into -the hands of the Babylonians, and the temple of Solomon was destroyed. -Slaves and captives are rarely good artists. - -During the _sixth_ period, after Kyrus had freed the Jews and permitted -them to return to their native country, their national position -improved. Under Darius, Zorobabel received permission to reconstruct -the temple of Solomon on the foundations of the one erected by that -wise king, and it was accordingly rebuilt, but this could only be done -in accordance with the impoverished condition of freed captives. - -During the _seventh_ period, under Alexander the Great and his -followers, the Jews, attacked by Persians, Egyptians, and Syrians, -showed that they could rise to the very highest deeds of heroism and -self-sacrifice. - -Finally, during the _eighth_ period, under the Romans, they gave up all -hope of maintaining their position as a chosen people; they revolted -sometimes, but more for theological than political reasons. Pompey -treated them with great kindness and consideration after the capture of -Jerusalem. During the reign of Augustus the town attained a grandeur -and extension which it had never possessed, even in its brightest -days under the sway of Solomon. But stubborn and arrogant as the Jews -always were in times of prosperity, though enjoying a certain amount of -freedom, they revolted, and the town and temple were destroyed. Nothing -was left but the candlestick with seven branches, symbolic with the -Egyptians of the seven planets, and with the Jews of seven archangels, -or of the seven days of the week, sculptured in marble on the Arch -of Titus, together with a facsimile of the holy ark, and some of the -trumpets, used in religious ceremonies. It would be most interesting if -the original relics, which it is assumed are buried in the Tiber, could -be recovered; and, as so many venerable relics of by-gone ages have -been brought to light, we do not despair of once seeing these remains. - -The tabernacle, or earliest temple of the Jews, was entirely -constructed on the plan of an Egyptian temple. To convince ourselves -of this truth we need only compare its plan with that of the temple at -Edfou. The triple division into a Pronaos, Naos, and Adytum, or the -Holy of Holies, was strictly observed in both. The Adytum was a cube -10 cubits, or 15 feet each way; an outer temple, as Naos, consisted -of two such cubes, 15 feet broad by 30 feet long. Adytum and Naos -were covered by a sloping roof, which projected 5 cubits (7½ feet) in -every direction beyond the temple itself, making the whole 40 cubits, -or 60 feet, in length, by 20 cubits, or 30 feet, in width. Adytum -and Naos stood in an enclosure--the Pronaos, 100 cubits (150 feet) -long, by 50 cubits (75 feet) broad. From Moses to Solomon, for 600 -years, this tabernacle was the only temple of the Jews. When Solomon -began to construct the temple, he adhered strictly to the above -arrangement, only doubling all the dimensions. The temple partook more -of the character of a square shrine, or a store-house intended to -contain precious works in metal; a kind of opisthodomos. The principal -ornaments were two brazen pillars, Jachin and Boaz (sun and moon), -by the skilful Hiram of Tyre. They were said to have been marvels of -metal-work. The pillars of Susan or Persepolis, which had capitals -of the same relative proportions, may give us some idea of these. In -Egyptian temples it was also usual to place propyleæ at the porch of -a temple, and the same custom prevailed with the Phoenicians, as in the -case of the celebrated Venus (Astarte or Astharote) shrine at Paphos. -After the construction of the temple by Solomon, Jerusalem became the -holy and exclusive central point of Judaism. There only, and nowhere -else, did they allow their God to be present. Zorobabel erected on -the very spot another altar and temple in the same spirit, and this -is the reason why the erection of a second temple at Heliopolis by -Onias, under the Ptolemæians, caused such animosity and jealousy -amongst Egyptian and Judaic Jews. It is said that the necessary marble, -wood, and stone, and also the gold, silver, and brass vessels had -already been weighed and prepared for the construction of the temple -during the reign of King David, who gave his son the plan of the -whole architectural construction. According to Chronicles, however, -it appears that David made little or no preparation, and that Solomon -only found some of the brass-work ready for use. This latter assertion -is clearly verified by the correspondence between Solomon and Hiram. -Solomon asks for wood for building in general, as also cedars and -cypress trees from Mount Lebanon; adding that he wishes that Sidonians, -as experienced carpenters, should help his own workmen, whom he -designates as less able. This does not say very much in favour of the -artistic skill of the Jews, who at the period of Solomon's reign had -not yet attained the same degree of proficiency as the pre-historic -constructors of pile-dwellings. The request of Solomon was granted by -the King of Tyre, and Adoniram was sent as foreman of the Sidonian -carpenters, of whom 30,000 were appointed by Solomon; 10,000 of these -worked alternately from month to month. Besides the 30,000 carpenters, -there were 80,000 sculptors, or rather stone-cutters and masons, and -70,000 journeymen, making altogether 180,000 working men, under 3,300 -overseers, employed in the construction of the temple, all tributary -_strangers_ whom David had conquered. The construction began 592 years -after Exodus, about 975 years B.C. Mount Moreah, or Moriah, was the -site chosen, and the temple was completed in _seven_ years. The inner -temple was 60 cubits (90 feet) long, 20 cubits (30 feet) broad, and 30 -cubits (45 feet) high. Josephus says it was 120 cubits (180 feet) high; -this would make the edifice resemble a square tower. The Pronaos may -have been 120 cubits high. The space, 60 cubits long and 20 broad, was -separated into two divisions. Of these the rear was 20 cubits square, -forming the Holy of Holies, the 'sekos' of the Egyptian temples. The -other division, 40 by 10, formed the Naos, the holy place, which was -preceded by a hall, the Pronaos. The division: One God, one priesthood, -and one people, was thus expressed. Rooms were constructed round the -temple three stories high, corresponding to the rooms in the Egyptian -Labyrinth, and the Brahmanic and Buddhistic choultries, or cloisters. -There were thirty rooms on each floor. The height of the temple having -been 30 cubits, this would give 15 feet for each story, walls included. -Josephus doubles all these dimensions, and adopts inconceivable -measurements. The ninety rooms were used as receptacles for the sacred -vessels, and the temple was thus literally a holy treasury. The Holy -of Holies having been only 20 cubits high, a space of 10 cubits, or -15 feet, would have been left above it; of this room no intelligible -mention is made. In the Septuagint there is an allusion, which differs -from the Vulgate and the different translations. In Chronicles we -have upper chambers mentioned, which were overlaid with gold; this -might have been the rooms or chambers above the Holy of Holies. No -special staircase led to this room. It was undoubtedly a mysterious -apartment, and, like all mysteries, excited some writers to very varied -speculations on its possible nature. Amongst others the learned Ben -David, in a letter to Lichtenberg in the Berlin 'Archive der Zeit,' -asserted that this chamber must have contained an electric battery, for -golden chains connected the room with the pillars of Jachin and Boaz, -which were hollow, and could be placed in communication with the altar -of brass. The points of the temple were golden. At the consecration -of the temple, clouds, produced by incense, suddenly filled the -interior of the temple, and a flash of lightning ignited the sacrifice. -Michaelis tells us that the temple was never struck by lightning--the -lightning, therefore, setting fire to the sacrifice must have been -produced within the temple. - -No stone roofs or vaults are mentioned in connection with the temple -or palace built by the Jews; architecture was, therefore, in its most -primitive stage. The inner temple and the Holy of Holies were entered -through folding-doors. The Holy of Holies was entirely empty, symbolic -of the incomprehensibility of the nature of the Deity. This was also -the case in Egypt with the 'sekos,' which was, in fact, a shrine either -quite empty, or containing a scroll, on which were written the words: -'I am that was, that is, and that shall be.' Two courts surrounded -the temple, an inner and an outer court. The outer court was open -to every Jew, but the inner court to the priests only. The former -was surrounded by a double row of pillars overlaid with cedar-wood. -It is said that Solomon had valleys filled up in order to make the -concrete subconstruction of the length even. Each side of the outer -wall surrounding the whole temple was 4 stadia or 1 stadium (606 feet -9 inches English) in length, giving 2,427 feet all round. The pillars -Jachin and Boaz stood on the staircase of the inner court; each was 36 -feet in circumference, 54 feet in height without the capital, which -was 15 feet high. The shafts were hollow and the brass 4 inches thick. -On the south-eastern side stood the round brass basin, called the sea, -30 feet in diameter, in which the priests used to wash their hands. -Besides the 'sea,' there stood on pedestals on either side of the -temple five cups, 12 feet in diameter and 9 feet high. The altar of the -burning sacrifice, in the middle of this space, was 60 feet broad and -as many feet long; all these secondary necessaries of the temple stood -in the east. The surrounding courts rose in terraces like those of -the palace of Persepolis. The temple, whatever its magnificence might -have been in precious stones, gold, silver, carved cherubim, brass and -silver vessels, washing-basins and candlesticks, was architecturally an -utter failure, whether compared with the monumental temples of Egypt, -the grand and splendid palaces of Assyria, Babylon, or Persepolis, -or the temple of Diana at Ephesus. The latter, which was built on a -marsh, that it might not be endangered by earthquakes, was 425 feet -in length and 220 in width, and had 127 columns 60 feet high, each -the gift of a king. This is the account given by Pliny, who, however, -describes either the seventh or eighth temple. Stable as was everything -in religious matters with the Jews, they did not venture in rebuilding -their temple to make any alterations; a stone displaced, an ornament -improved, might have driven their God from his chosen abode. With such -ideas art is impossible. The additions made to the temple under the -Romans, in order to render the building more in harmony with their -street architecture, were only outer courts with rich colonnades of -Corinthian columns, and had nothing to do with the temple itself. -These formed the Stoa-Basilica, with the court of the Gentiles, which -is spoken of as imposing and forming a mighty group, and must not be -confounded with the temple itself, which was certainly no specimen of -architecture, either in dimension, in plan, or in decoration, if we -except some stiff vine foliage on capitals, which was exceptionally -characteristic of the Jewish style. - -The numerous tombs in the neighbourhood of Jerusalem are rock-hewn, -clearly betraying their Egyptian origin; they are provided with -numerous hollows for the reception of the bodies. These sepulchres are -without any artistic stamp; on some façades we can see the Egyptian -fluted corona. The façades of the so-called royal tombs of Jacob or the -judges are decorated in a Greek style, as are the tombs of Zacharias -and Absalom; the latter stand out from the rock as independent -structures, ornamented with Ionic pillars, and above the Egyptian -corona rises a pyramidal or conical structure; a combination of the -pre-historic tumulus with Egyptian and classic elements. Something is -borrowed from everyone to make up a chosen national element. - -In books or in conversation this may avail, but in art, where the -outer impression is to create a corresponding sensation, assertions -must be borne out by visible productions, and to falsify architectural -records is much more difficult than to interpolate passages, alter -dates, or make assertions in utter defiance of probability and -possibility. The Hebrews, whether as Jews or Israelites, had no -art, and never pretended to have one; they were contented with the -art-products which other nations made for them, in perfect accordance -with the clearly-expressed promise of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and -Jacob: 'That He would give them great and goodly cities, which they -would not build; and houses full of good things, which they would not -fill; and wells digged, which they would not dig; and vineyards and -olive trees, which they would not plant.' With such principles neither -architecture, sculpture, nor ornamentation could flourish. Art in Asia -never became master of matter from an esthetical point of view, for, -in all these works, matter sways the mind; it is either an exhibition -of precious stones on walls, or lace-work in marble, or endless heaps -of huge granite blocks and columns without purpose, or decorations in -wild, fantastic, and endless combinations. The Eastern mind could not -free itself from the influence of a mighty hierarchy. In the East it -was the eternal _Hermes_, the _Logos_, the _priest_, who read truth -in the stars, manufactured gods and goddesses, wrote the language of -heaven, drew up plans for temples, squared out the proportions of the -human body, and gave laws to sculptors and painters, to stone-cutters -and masons, to joiners and carpenters, weavers and dyers. Hermes, with -his followers, was the physician, the lawgiver, and the judge of the -masses; he prayed, he sacrificed for them, he prophesied, circumcised, -married, embalmed, and buried them. The priest in the East, whether -as Brahman, Buddhist, Hierophant, Magi, or Levite, generally placed -the idea, the spirit, the word, the {logos} above the form, which, -in itself, crippled the form the more effectually, because the form, -however revolting, was the mere symbol of some sacred mystery. The -creative genius of art was thus almost extinguished under the stifling -and petrifying influence of hierarchical formalism, and, until it had -been freed from this, could neither develop nor prosper. The process of -freeing humanity from this formalism was first begun and accomplished -by the Greeks. - - - - -CHAPTER VIII. - -GREEK ART. - - -Art has appeared to us till now under peculiar circumstances. -We have seen it in Asia and Africa, and in both parts of the -world it represented the uninterrupted struggle of humanity for -self-consciousness. Humanity was too much under the influence of the -marvellous and incomprehensible, and neither the marvellous nor the -incomprehensible can be brought into shape. The Indians tried to give -forms to the metaphysical phenomena of nature; the Persians were bent -on the glorification of the power of one visible earthly despot; -the Egyptians tried to copy the realistic phenomena of nature, and -inscribed them with mystic signs, uniting Indian abstractions with -the real phenomena of nature. When a thought was fixed into a form; -the thought, being at the same time a religious conception, could no -more be changed; it became in art what a technical name for a natural -phenomenon is in science. Oxygen is oxygen, and designates only that -element; so when once a form was settled, as that of Vishnu or Amn, -S'iva or Osiris--or the serpent fixed as a symbol of eternity, or the -hawk as a symbol of light--the inner or spiritual life of the artist -was fettered down to outward forms with special inward meanings. Thus -the constraining sway of misunderstood nature on one side, and the -stationary precepts of an omnipotent hierarchy on the other, entangled -the artist's imagination and paralysed every effort of his subjective -power of production. The different nations began to be wrapped up -in their different artistic forms, which became by degrees hard and -impenetrable _national_ and religious incrustations; the masses, held -in abeyance, led by theocratical art, had only to glorify one visible -or invisible tyrant, with whom the universe was blessed. Eastern art -was to a certain degree plastic, only too plastic as in India; but -it was too penetrated with an incomprehensible spiritualism to find -the right objects for its plastic tendencies. Even where geometrical -figures, flowers, or trees were used, the effect of their simple -combination was marred by a want of harmony between thought and form, -or idea and body. This harmony between outward form and inner spirit, -wherein real beauty consists, this balance between the dynamic and -static cosmogonical elements, was wanting in Eastern art. The East rent -nature asunder, and looked upon _matter_ as _evil_; and yet matter was -to be used, to bring spirit into form. The element of S'iva, Ahriman, -or Typhon was to give visible form to the conceptions of Brahma, -Ormuzd, or Osiris, and could not do this, because the connecting -link to blend the apparently-opposed powers into one, was wanting. A -uniting force for this mysterious antagonism, a mediator between heaven -and earth, divinity and humanity, was sought for, but not found. The -Persian unconsciously set Meshiah (man, _mensch_) down as that element, -but Meshiah was not yet allowed to come to any free development, and -he sank into the pitiful and degraded position of a slave to despotic -oligarchs, or still more intolerant spiritual hierarchs. Meshiah -(humanity) was first freed by the _Greeks_ in _form_ and by _Christ_ in -_spirit_. - -There can be no doubt that the Greeks were, for a short time at least, -the ancient representatives of the well-balanced static and dynamic -forces in humanity. Of all the geographical districts of the world, -whether in the Eastern or Western hemisphere, none are so admirably -adapted for the cultivation of social intercourse as the Grecian -isles, and the Grecian peninsula, the classical region of the Ægean -Sea. Nowhere is so large a coast-line found, surrounding so small -a territorial surface; nowhere such a variety of creeks, capes, -promontories, inlets, and harbours as round the Peloponnesus, and the -islands uniting Asia Minor with Greece and Italy. No streams like the -Ganges, or the Hoang-ho; no mountains like the Belur Tag or Himâlâya. -Gorgeous uniformity is the characteristic of China and India; variety -and change the very element of the Greek world. Mountains, plains, -valleys, streams, are all of a limited size; there rules a sweet, -eternal harmony between spirit and form; nothing is exaggerated, -nothing overawes man; he feels at home; the dark-blue sky over-arches -his verdant, hilly, amiable earth, adorned with brooks and hills, -boskets and flowers. Valley chases valley; rivulet pursues rivulet; -clouds follow clouds; the morning dawn flies before the bright noon, -and the noon dies away, in the cool sighs of the evening breezes, into -the embrace of dark night. The self-conscious spirit of _youthful_ -humanity came into life for the first time in Greece. Everything with -the Greeks was _feeling_, but a feeling, conscious of a real purpose -in religion, the State, the family, and in art. We shall see that -intuitive feeling grow by degrees into _critical reflection_, but in -the first instance everything with the Greeks was ingenuous, or, as the -French call it, 'naïve.' This classical 'naïveté,' this unconscious, -unaffected simplicity, enabled them to become masters of intuitive -productions, and to look upon this world with an unbiassed eye, prone -only to see what was harmonious and beautiful. The whole life of -the Greeks was thus one long _ideal_ dream of poetical and artistic -_reality_. They took an interest, however, in objective individuality -only; the beauties of nature as one great total did not yet affect -their subjective comprehension. They could not grasp the pantheistic -notion of the Indians, who saw in every detailed phenomenon of the -universe the working of ONE indivisible and incomprehensible first -cause. They shuddered at the Egyptian monsters, which were to serve -as symbols of that sublime conception which lost on the Nile all its -primitive grandeur. They found the Persian absorption of the universe -into a conflict between light and darkness too dreary, and ascribed -to it the loss of all individual freedom. They worked out a system of -their own, based on Indian grandeur, Egyptian symbolism, and Persian -abstractions. To be thoroughly acquainted with this combination of -influences is the very first step towards an understanding of Greek art. - -The Greeks were Aryans in language, and in mode of thinking; Aryans -who had detached themselves very early from their Cis-Himâlâyan -brethren, and peopled Asia Minor and the surrounding islands. They were -strengthened by Egyptian and Phoenician immigrations, and invigorated by -Thracia's warlike spirit. - -Like a plant that only lives and grows by means of the antithetic -activity of air, light, and water, the Greek State-body had air -supplied by Orpheus from Thracia, light by Kekrops from Egypt, and -water by Kadmus from Phoenicia. Independent freedom and love of the -arts were the gifts of the North; the South furnished them with deep -knowledge, and Phoenicia gave them the vivifying spirit of commerce. -Their language is an offshoot of the Sanskrit, but stands in a more -distant relation to it than the Zend--to which it is closely allied. -They are principally distinguished from the Asiatic nations by their -decided hatred of everything arbitrary and chaotic. From their love for -individuality and diversity of customs, manners and modes of thinking, -sprang the national unity of the Greeks in the fairy realms of Poetry -and Art. When they began to feel themselves a people, they assumed the -name of Hellenes; and their first historical deed was the admirable -completion of a language which, for simplicity, power, and beauty, -has remained up to our own days a model for all other languages, for -it alike possesses eurythmy and power of expression. The overwhelming -metaphysical subtleties of the Sanskrit are simplified; the variety -of consonants and vowels reduced, and the mode of writing corrected; -everything proving a deep sense for order, clearness, and moderation. - -They had three dialects: the Doric, distinguished by a broader -pronunciation; the Ionic, possessed of softness and a melodious -richness; and the Æolic, a kind of mixture without a special character. -The Dorians came southwards from the hoary mountains of Thessaly, and -gained step by step an influence and dominion over the other tribes -of Greece. The Ionians occupied the east, and were considered the -connecting link between Hellas and Asia; but whatever the Hellenes took -from Byblos, Sidon, Tyros or the Libanon, assumed a really Hellenic -form, after it had passed through the purifying element of Doric -correctness. The south gave _ideas_, and the north brought them into -_form_. - -Whatever the Hellenes touched they beautified. The powerful giant Bhîma -of the Mahâbhârata is the prototype of Herakles; but in the myths -concerning Herakles we recognise the mere personification of commercial -daring and enterprise. Accompanied by his dog, he finds the cochineal; -the goblet in which he sails to Erytheia is but the Phoenician -merchantman; the Phoenicians are referred to, when it is recorded of -him that he had broken the devastating horn of the mountain-streams. -Moloch, to whom Assyrians, Indians and Hebrews sacrificed, without ever -being capable of investing the fire-spitting monster with anything like -poetry, was destroyed by Herakles. The gods of Asia became with the -Hellenes demons, from whom they learned some useful trades. Poseidon, -the god of the sea, is, like the element over which he rules and in -which he dwells, of a sinister, implacable character; he requires -human sacrifices, annihilates horses (meaning ships), in fact does, -as incarnate divinity, what the sea does in our own times. The Titans -are acquainted with astronomy, and are personifications of a certain -knowledge in maritime matters. Proteus, the Egyptian Pharaoh, is -with them the keeper of the seas, and Atlas the father of nautical -astronomy, and both were companions of the Tyrean Herkules. In all -the myths and legends of the Greeks we can trace some facts. The -divinity they could only comprehend in the well-proportioned form of a -human being, and a hero or benefactor of humanity became with them a -divinity. This blending into one of the divine and human is the most -important feature in Greek thought. Vishnu and Osiris also became -incarnate--but their deeds were supernatural; the principal feature -of their 'man-godhead,' or 'divine manhood,' is an incomprehensible -mysticism. Their anthropomorphism had in it something gloomy. When the -divine Apollo uttered the memorable words: '_Man, know thyself_,' the -Greeks became suddenly conscious of the inborn spark of the divine -intellect in man; the gods were intelligible to them, and the Asiatic -world of abstractions emerged in a thousand different human forms of -divine conceptions. - -_Uranos_ (_Varuna_ in Sanskrit) is heaven, or rather space--_Kronos_, -time, and _Gæa_, earth. _Uranos_ as well as _Kronos_ and _Pontos_ were -offsprings of the Earth. So far we have to deal with the same mystical -elements which engendered all the Asiatic cosmogonies. But Uranos and -Gæa are set down as male and female, and are endowed with powerful -children--the Titans and Titanides, the Hekatoncheires (or Kentimanos, -hundred-handed, powerful giants with fifty heads), and the Kyklopes, -who were very clever, and invented many useful arts. - -The most important gods were Okeanos, Japetós, and Kronos. The human -character of Greek mythology begins even before the birth of Zeus. -Uranos was afraid of his own children, and had them confined in eternal -darkness in Tartaros; their mother, Gæa, had pity on them, and armed -the youngest, Kronos, with a sickle, with which he attacked Uranos, -and deprived him of his creative power. From that moment Uranos was -idle, could produce no new forms, and was neither worshipped by gods -nor men. The fact which underlies this dramatic scene, in which gods -are the actors, is a cosmical phenomenon. In time all things were -created, and in time the creative force, as far as our earth was -concerned, ceased with the creation of man, to be productive of new -forms. Kronos had five children--Hestia, Demeter, Here, Pluton, and -Poseidon, and these he devoured. In this cruel image we see represented -the revolving movements of time, in which the present is everlastingly -the prey of the past, engendering the future. The sixth son of Kronos, -Zeus (creative ether), was saved by his mother's cunning, for she gave -the inhuman god a stone instead of her child; Metis, however (Maya, -Matter), afterwards the wife of Zeus; rescues the children that Kronos -had swallowed, and he is obliged to give them back again in an eternal -circle. These children of Kronos are years, months, weeks, days and -hours. We have here an instance of the manner in which phenomena were -turned by the Hellenes into living beings. Kronos was an old man with -a long flowing beard, and held a sickle or scythe in his hands, with -which he cut down everything. And as symbol of eternity a serpent lay -by his side. - -Zeus serves us even more as a specimen of the anthropomorphic tendency -of the Greeks. He was the _father_ of the gods, and had to _fight_ -with the Titans. He led the immortal gods, who assembled on Mount -Olympus against these terrible Titans, who mustered in great strength -on Mount Othrys. For ten years the battle raged without result; heaven, -earth, and sea resounded with the frightful struggle. Gæa advised -the gods to call in the Kyklopes and Hekatoncheires. These presented -Poseidon with the trident, Pluton with the helmet that had the power -to make the wearer invisible, and Zeus received from the depths of -the earth the flaming thunderbolts. Then only the Titans had to yield -to storms and lightnings, and were chained down at last in Tartaros. -We read a chapter of geology when we peruse Hesiod's description of -this struggle. In the Titans, Kyklopes, and the hundred-handed giants -we recognise the antediluvian monsters--the mastodons, megatheriums, -and saurians, petrified for ever in the strata of the earth's crust. -Zeus, after his conquest, began to rule the Olympian gods and mankind. -He himself was full of passion and wrath, of human failings and -shortcomings; but, after all, he was kind, dignified--even in his -weakness, just and grand. He smiled, and love and joy pervaded the -universe; he frowned, and the universe shook to its very foundations. -He indulged in freaks, and still was afraid of his haughty and jealous -wife, who acted in many instances as a well-bred lady would, who had -the misfortune to be wedded to an amorous husband. Zeus was frequently -so troubled by his riotous gods and goddesses, that he had a bad -headache, and was once obliged to call in Hephaistos to cure him with -a heavy blow, and on this occasion Minerva (wisdom) sprang forth armed -with spear, helmet, and shield. The truth that intellect and reason are -of divine origin was proclaimed in this myth. In the Greek legends the -poet's imagination has turned the forces of nature into beautiful men, -women, or children. How much the gods, with them, were the creatures -of man's fancy, may be seen in the fear of the opinions of their -earth-born children with which the gods were endowed. The Almighty -Thunderer, when his heavenly subjects made too much noise, often cried: -'What will my earthly sons say?' and for fear that they might find -fault with him he yielded, and made concessions, and heaven and earth, -sun, moon and stars were again at peace. - -It is true that in Indian lore the same characters are drawn, but, -like their supernatural gods, they are gigantic and monstrous. Men -and women in the Indian fables, behave like unwieldy spectres, that -frighten us during an uneasy dream; we must first divest them of their -inhuman forms in order to comprehend them. The conceptions are too -marvellous to impress us with moral lessons; we are lost in allegories, -metaphors, symbols and double meanings. This occurs less in Greek -mythology. _Atlas_ was the representative of patience; he had for -ever to carry the world on his shoulders, and was turned at last into -a rocky mountain range. _Epimetheus_ was the prototype of senseless -carelessness, and was destroyed by his own folly. _Prometheus_ at last -was the embodiment of considerate prudence; he was devoured by the -_vulture_ of 'care and sorrow for the morrow.' Prometheus may be said -to be the best, most intelligible emblem of classic humanity, as Faust -may be considered as the incarnation of romantic mankind. Prometheus -wanted to bring matter into form; Faust to _know_ what held spirit and -matter together. Prometheus stole fire from heaven, made man of clay, -and vivified him. Faust knew that this heavenly fire was a force over -which he had no control, and he called in a spirit to teach him 'how -all one whole harmonious weaves, each in the other works and lives.' -The '_formal_' is the longing of the Greek Faust, and the '_spiritual_' -the aspiration of the Teuton Prometheus. All the Greek eîdola embodied -some power of nature. Philomela was a pining woman. The Laurel was -formed out of the lovely Daphne (from the Sanskrit Dahanah, our word -'dawn'). In every tree a Dryad dwelt, in every wave a Naiad sported. -Demeter's tears for her lost daughter Persephone nourished rivulets. -On the bright heights of Mount Olympus, on Helikon, or Parnassus, or -Pindus, above the petty cares of every-day life, sat the earnest _Klio_ -with an open scroll and a stylum, recording with lovely patience the -events of the past. _Euterpe_, with her two flutes, brought harmony -into the discordant sounds of the earthly spheres, and filled the world -with songs and tunes; _Melpomene_, armed with gloomy mask and dagger, -presided over the fictitious sufferings of humanity struggling with -the inexorable fates, reflecting in an artificial mirror--reality. -_Thalia_, with a shepherd's staff and a Silenus' mask, endowed with an -eternal smile, comforted man with more cheerful views. _Terpsichore_, -with a lyre of seven chords, taught him to express joy, happiness, and -pious veneration by the rhythmical movements of his body. _Erato_, on -her Kythera with nine chords, warbled love-songs, and inspired and -aided young poets to pour out in measured language the immeasurable -feelings of their souls. _Polyhymnia_, or Polymnia, protected orators, -philosophers, and stage-players, and enabled them to keep within the -boundaries of moderation, for she placed the first finger of her right -hand on her lips, impressing them with the necessity for caution. -_Urania_, with her eyes lifted to the starry heavens, tried to draw -man's attention to the well-regulated courses of the heavenly bodies, -proclaiming in eternal silence with fiery tongues the glories of the -universe. _Kalliope_ finally taught man to record heroic deeds in -epic poetry. These _nine_ muses, presided over by the manly and wise, -valorous and glorious Apollo, nursed, taught, and accompanied the -Hellenes through life; they met them as lovely charmers in a thousand -different forms, in temples, on friezes, metopes, goblets, pateras, -amphoræ, and urns; nothing possessed a meaning for them that had not a -poetical, artistic, and scientific aim. - -Life with the Greeks was one continual festivity. They worshipped their -gods in singing joyous songs, in running, playing, and wrestling. They -thought it a duty to develop both body and intellect, the gifts of the -immortal gods. They deeply loved poetry, wrote it if they could, or -recited it, or listened to it and imbibed it with their whole souls. -They rejoiced in athletic sports; influenced by Terpsichore, they -showed the wondrous beauty of their harmoniously-constructed bodies. -Joy and delight swelled their muscles when they wrestled, and throbbed -through all their veins when they moved in rhythmical simplicity, like -the stars in heaven. They prayed when they composed epic poems; they -worshipped when they wrote tragedies or comedies; they honoured the -gods when they built temples; they humbly beseeched their blessing -when they sculptured. The whole life of the Greeks was one grateful -act of artistic devotion. Their temples were so many hymns in stone -and marble; their ornamentations in reliefs, sculptures, winding -frets and meanders, are epic poems, dramatic representations, and -lyric effusions of the very highest intellectual refinement. Art with -the Greeks was cherished, cultivated, and loved for its own divine -sake. Rich and poor, old and young, men and women, boys and girls, -used art and poetry, science and philosophy, as the plastic language -of their ever-praying lips, hands and minds. Whenever the life of a -nation is thus inspired; when the comprehensive culture of intellect, -the harmonious development of the body, and the mysterious feelings of -existence are guided by the mighty and productive energy of an awakened -and excited imagination, and regulated by a consciousness of order; art -must attain that expansive, noble, and beautiful form which we admire -in the Greeks. - -Greek poetry and philosophy had the same basis of reality as their -mythology. That which was asserted by the Asiatic and African -law-givers to have been directly dictated by the gods, was gradually -acquired by the Greeks through deductive and inductive reasoning. Soon -the mythological conceptions of the poets were turned into eîdola. -Aphrodite was set down as the representative of matter, out of which -all things were formed. Pallas-Athene lost her individuality, and -became intellect pervading humanity. Apollo was no more the 'god-man' -or the living sun, but cosmical heat. The forms of fearful monsters -that originated in Asia, with ferocious jaws, with three heads, -spreading fear and awe, looking as if nothing but human flesh could -satisfy their voracity, also terrified the Greeks during the mythic -period of their national existence, and human flesh was accordingly -sacrificed. Such sacrifices were prevalent wherever monster-gods, -without human shape, without legs or arms, with fishes' tails, dog's -or cat's heads, with round and glaring eyes, and many arms, inspired -the masses with fear and trembling. This was the case in Greece when -monsters and pirates peopled the sea-coasts; when _Geryon_, the giant -with three bodies, three heads, six hands, six legs, and two wings; -_Echidna_, the wife of Typhon; the _Lernean_ serpent, with nine or with -fifty heads; the _Chimera_, with a lion's or goat's head; the _Sphinx_, -with a woman's head and bust, the body of a lion, and the wings and -tail of a dragon; and the fearfully howling _Skylla_, with six heads -and six long necks, formed part of their pantheon. As soon, however, as -poetry threw a glittering veil of beauty over the forces and phenomena -of nature, no one thought of sacrificing human flesh to the gods. Who -could have slaughtered a human being in the sight of the Olympian Zeus -or the Pallas-Athene of Pheidias, the Venus of Alkemenes, or the Apollo -of Praxiteles? - -The Greek mind, once on the road to progress through a correct -appreciation of beauty, developed with incredible rapidity. - -The elements of art as well as of science are threefold. We have:-- - -a. The reign of _imagination_ through the emotional element, -more or less regulated; - -b. That of _intellect_, the reflective element, more or less -influenced by imagination; and - -c. That of _reason_, the speculative element, discerning -between imagination and intellect, and binding the two into one. - -The first element is the province of the unconscious artist. He -trusts his own subjective imagination, and sees things only from his -individual point of view. - -The second tries to compare the different products of art, to draw -analogies between them, and to assign causes for certain forms. This is -the province of the chronicler, the antiquary, and the art-historian. - -The third reaches the sphere of philosophical consciousness. In it the -esthetical writer combines a correct appreciation of art as a grand -total, with all its essential details. He sees distinctly its inner -element based on immutable general laws, and comprehends the necessary -organism, without which an artistic work cannot exist. - -Poetry and philosophy, like art, passed through these developments in -Greece. First we have the epic and lyric poets: Homer, Hesiod, Sappho, -Alkæus, and Pindar; next the dramatic poets: Æschylus, Sophokles, and -Euripides. At last the philosophers and historians: Plato, Aristotle, -Herodotus, Thukydides, and Xenophon. - -In analogy with these purely mental phases we have in art: the -architect, who constructs a small world of organic coherence out -of inorganic matter by means of his imagination; the sculptor, who -reproduces with discernment the organic world around him in inorganic -matter, but endows it with individual expression and feeling; the -painter at last, who creates with his colours a union of spirit and -matter, of idea and form. - -Beauty was in all Greek products the vital element. 'True beauty, the -companion of the gods, must be sought for,' says Pausanias, and makes -no advances; it is too elevated to communicate itself,' And Plato -propounds: 'The Supreme has no image; he converses only with the wise; -with the vulgar he shows himself proud and forbidding; always equal, he -expresses the emotion of the souls, he wraps himself in the delicious -calm of that divine nature of which the great masters in the arts, -according to ancient writers, endeavoured to seize the type.' This -delicious calm may be traced everywhere in Greek art, and forms its -essential element. - -The temples of the Greeks were national and public buildings. They were -not mere shrines destined as exclusive dwelling-places for some visible -or invisible, concrete or abstract, theocratic monster. They were the -central spots for their national assemblies, their gatherings, and for -the celebration of their public festivities. - -The Olympian, Pythian, Nemæan, and Isthmian games attracted visitors -to these temples. These games did not consist of mere exhibitions of -athletic prowess; but poets like Pindar--tragedians like Æschylus and -Sophokles--historians like Herodotus--read to enraptured audiences the -masterly products of their intellectual powers. Wrestlers and runners, -sculptors and poets, and tragic and comic writers vied with one another -to be crowned with a laurel wreath, or to receive a palm-twig, some -a crown, or a tripod. No sordid feeling of gain mingled with their -yet unalloyed pleasure in being distinguished for mere distinction's -sake; the commercial question was unregarded. The prizes, given away -in the sight of the delighted masses, were for everything--for bodily -as well as for intellectual excellence--even for proficiency in the -art of kissing. At the festival of the Philesian Apollo a prize for -the most exquisite kiss was conferred upon a young lady. At Sparta -and at Lesbos, in the temple of Here, and also among the citizens -of Parrhasia, women contended for the prizes with men. How much we -try to imitate Greek customs may be judged from the fact, that we -also give prizes for exquisite dogs, cats out of proportion, and fat -babies; but we are sorry to say, that this is done with a keen eye to -business--to advertise a baby-food or a dog-or cat-fancier. That art is -not altogether Greek with us need astonish no one. We are trained for -practical purposes, but the Greeks were trained to appreciate beauty, -symmetry, and harmony, not in verses only, but also in the human frame -and in every product of art. Architecture with them was thoroughly -plastic; it was never subservient to some metaphysical subtlety; it -was finished in itself; a total of which every part formed, as in the -human body, a completing element--without which the whole conception -of a temple would be as incomplete as a man without arms, legs, or -toes. The Greek temple entirely differed from the gloomy buildings of -Egypt or India, which were constructed as symbols of hell, earth, and -heaven; hell was for the sinners, the outcasts and the poor; earth for -the respectable middle-classes; and heaven for the priests, the kings -and their high officials. The constructions never made any attempt -at symmetrical beauty, but aimed only at gorgeous pomp, in order to -overawe the credulous mob--mystery was their essence. Sudden turnings -placed the terrified worshipper, unawares, face to face with some -colossal idol, looking to the excited and surprised imagination twice -as large as it was, and ascending and descending staircases visibly -divided the temple into abodes of splendour and horror. With the -ancient Greeks in constructing a temple, the first question was the -aim of the building; to whom was it to be dedicated--to Zeus, Apollo, -Poseidon, Minerva or Venus? This question once decided, the most -convenient spot, in accordance with the character of the god to whose -worship the temple was to be dedicated, was chosen. The building to be -erected was always to be in harmony with the surrounding scenery. - -The temple with the Greeks generally stood on a terrace-like base of -several steps. - -The Doric, Ionic, and Korinthian orders, as architectural subdivisions, -are most usual. So far as the different styles are concerned, a -fourth must be added, which modern art-historians call the Attic. The -Greeks were undoubtedly the first people who succeeded in producing -architectural works of art; they were also the first:-- - -(_a_) To distinguish the material; - -(_b_) To bring about symmetry and proportion; and - -(_c_) To construct with a clear consciousness of purpose. - -Marble was most profusely made use of; wood also, but the latter by -degrees disappeared altogether. The Athenians completed even the roofs -of their temples in stone. - -The Greeks availed themselves of soft materials, such as clay, chalk, -gypsum, and marble dust, for stucco ({koniasis}), in which they -excelled all other nations. - -Metal too formed an important element in their decorations. It is -asserted by many authorities that the Korinthian capital was not the -latest development of Greek architecture; but that on the contrary -it was older than the simplified and more correct Doric capital, -which, showing no traces of wood-construction, is altogether of a -pure 'stone-feeling,' whilst the forms of the Korinthian capital bear -undoubted traces of wood-carving and metallotechnic. - -We see that the Greeks employed pliable, plastic, elastic and solid -materials; the great secret of their success lay in the fact that they -made use of these elements appropriately. - -The vertical and horizontal were the principal lines used by the -Greeks. The curved line was not altogether excluded. The uprising -straight lines in columns were cylindrical or conical. The relation -of the lines to one another, and to the whole of the building, was -regulated by a strict observation of the laws of proportion. - -The diameter or half-diameter of the column (the module) served as the -unit for the whole building. As in the human body the general law of -proportion does not exclude an infinite diversity of forms, so in the -Greek temples regulation did not preclude variety. In man the height is -limited, and, to a certain extent, determined by his bones. This was -the case in the Greek temple. The height was limited by the diameter of -the column. Taking two columns of the same height, the one thin and the -other thick, the thin column will appear high and the other short, but -both will have a certain proportion, taken from their own body; the one -will be, say, nine times the diameter of its body, and the other only -seven times. Proportion in no way fetters the artist; it allows him -perfect freedom, but _freedom in order_, without which no good building -is possible. All architectural elements are of geometrical origin. -These elements are to be divided into those that support, and those -that are supported. The column is the most perfect supporting body; -surrounding a vertical axis in a slightly conical form. Through the -'_contractura_,' the swelling or tapering, it assumes the most perfect -expression of the dynamic force in the striving upwards. Through the -square plinth (Abacus) a harmonious union is effected between column, -as supporter, and architrave, as the supported, or static, element of -the building. - -The Greek temple was pre-eminently the house of the man-like god. The -god in the most exquisite idealised human form was visibly present. A -forecourt (pronaos) led to the cella (naos); there was a rear-court -(posticum), and occasionally a special court (the opisthodome) was -added. Architecture and sculpture were closely allied in Greece; and -still so clear and rational a separation between these two art-sisters, -as existed there, has nowhere been observed. Through this apparent -contradiction, architecture gained an independent soul, full of emotion -and life, whilst sculpture obtained a well-proportioned body, the -closely united artistic product being thus endowed with solidity and -firmness. - -The general architectural arrangement of a Greek temple was invariably -the same. The cella, the abode of the divinity, was of smaller -or larger dimensions. Two rows of columns adorned the interior, -supporting an upper gallery. If the central space was left roofless, -to supply the temple with light, it was called _hypæthral_. A temple, -surrounded by one row of columns, was designated a _Peripteros_; -if two rows of columns ornamented it, a _Dipteros_. With a front -portico it was _Prostyle_; provided with a court, both front and back, -_Amphiprostyle_. The pillars projecting on the side walls were _antæ_; -and a temple having this decorative element was styled an _Antætemple_. -The colonnade surrounding the temple at smaller or greater distances, -represented a combined power of support. The base marked the -independent existence of the separate columns. The shaft was covered -with channelled flutings, and rose vertically with a convex extension -of its circumference (called _entasis_). It then strongly contracted, -thus expressing in the most perfect manner not merely passive -sustaining, but an active and lively support. Above the capitals the -mighty beams of the architrave (epistyle) were held together by a broad -band, on which rested the frieze, sometimes adorned with triglyphs and -metopes, or with reliefs; above it projected the overhanging plinth -of the principal cornice. On the narrow sides of the oblong building, -bordered by a cornice (the corona, geison) and the roof-gutter, -rose the pediment with its groups and statues. On the front edge of -the roof, both at the corners and in the middle, there stood smaller -sculptures or marble palm-trees; whilst at the sides the rain-water -was ejected through lions' heads; the finishing horizontal lines were -eurythmically crowned with palm-shaped tiles (antifixæ). The roof and -the rest of the building, in the noblest works, were of marble, the -architectural product being thus transformed into an elegant chiselled -work of sculpture. - -The Greeks had in their mythology: - -1. Powerful gods and goddesses, as Zeus, Pallas, Poseidon, and Mars. - -2. Charming and lovely divinities, as Aphrodite, Eros, and Persephone. - -3. Mixtures of sublime power and beauty, of manly dignity and -womanly grace, as Here, Diana, Bacchus, and Apollo. In studying -the characteristics of these three groups of divinities we become -acquainted with the principal features of the three orders of their -architecture. - -I. The _Doric_ order is full of power and monumental dignity. Force is -its most prominent characteristic. - -II. The _Ionic_ order mingles southern imagination with northern -severity; this order, with its voluted capital instead of the simple -abacus, is of a more complicated character and livelier expression. - -III. The _Korinthian_ order exhibits, instead of the tapering Doric, a -slender column--ending in a richly-decorated, upward-striving capital. -There is something of the Doric style in the Ionic, and something of -the Ionic in the Korinthian. The Doric was, however, the basis of Greek -architecture. - -_A._ The _Doric_ order had six distinct developments of style. - -_a._ The _proto-Doric_, compressed and heavy. - -_b._ The _lax Archaic-Doric_, slender, with more distinctly-tapering -columns. - -_c._ The _stern Archaic-Doric_, more finished and graceful in its -proportions. - -_d._ The _pure Doric_, most correct in all its details. - -_e._ The _Attic-Doric_, during the rule of Perikles, combining utmost -severity with the very highest refinement in execution. - -_f._ The _Makedonian-Doric_ style; not correctly proportioned, the -columns becoming elongated, and the distances narrowed. Gorgeousness -and vanity predominate. - -_B._ The _Ionic_ order had three distinct phases of development in -style. - -_a._ The first _simple_ in form, with the strongly-pronounced volute. - -_b._ The _richly ornamented_ style, as in the temple of Minerva Polias. - -_c._ The _compound_ style; half Doric and half Ionic. - -_C._ The _Korinthian_ order passed through four phases of style: - -_a._ The _undecided_ style; half Ionic and half Korinthian. - -_b._ The _finished_ style; graceful and rich. - -_c._ The _over-decorated_ style, with strong Ionic forms. - -_d._ The _variegated_ style, with decorative additions of trophies, -winged-horses, dolphins, and eagles; half northern and half -southern--combining Asiatic with Greek forms. - -_D._ The Doric intermingled with Ionic forms produced in Attica a -peculiar order, or rather mere style, neither Doric, nor Ionic, nor -Korinthian--a kind of eclectic style which we may very properly call -the _Attic_ style. The Erechtheium of Athens was in this style. There -are six principal distinctions in this style, which justify us in -treating it as totally distinct from those mentioned under _A_, _B_ and -_C_:-- - -1. A particular plinth is wanting in the base. - -2. Instead of this, a double contraction is transformed into one, -united to the common support by means of a strong circular ovolo. The -contractura is expressed on a small scale in the base. - -3. The shaft is more slender in proportion. - -4. The volutes are more projecting. - -5. The frieze is considerably higher than it is generally in any of the -other orders. - -6. The corona is without the dentated ornament; but the projecting -plinth is strongly undercut, and powerfully overhangs the finishing -member of the frieze. - -In all classifications of this kind a narrow-minded pedantry is to be -avoided; canons, of whatever sort, hinder the natural growth of art. -Still worse than strict canons is ignorance. Without a correct and -thorough knowledge of Greek literature, no man can aspire to an exalted -position in poetry and science; and without a correct and thorough -study of Greek art, no man can become an artist. We do not recommend a -slavish imitation of the Greeks, but a thorough understanding of their -slow development, through the phases of unconscious reproduction and -systematically conscious creation, to the philosophical appreciation of -beauty, which enabled them to reflect in their works of art the eternal -types of Nature in an idealised form. - -The same gradual development which we remarked in their architecture -also took place in Greek keramic art. The oldest pottery was coarse, -the material generally taken from the most recent formation of the -soil, the Cainozoic period. These older specimens are very much alike -amongst all the Aryan nations. The forms are undecided, and made by the -hand; the ornaments, as in pre-historic times, consisted of points, -zigzags, spirals and knobs. At a very early period, however, the Greeks -as Pelasgians, Achaians, Danaians and Argeians, possessed more defined -outlines, and a more perfect symmetry, even in their very coarsest -pottery. - -In the oldest, so-called Tyrrhenian, vases we have already a decided -plastic improvement. The ornamentation takes its patterns from -metallotechnic, and we recognise Asiatic influences in the winged -horses and lions, stamped in the clay as flat ornaments. The Greek -taste improved; leaves and flowers were treated with a delicate, -idealising conventionalism; the vine, ivy, anthimion, and masks -and festoons, were used for decorative purposes, and gave to the -well-shaped vessel a high artistic value. This was the most successful -period of pottery for Greece. Samos appears to have been the principal -place for its manufacture. The use of the wheel was long dispensed -with; the Greeks trusting more to the delicacy of their touch than to -the technical accuracy of a machine. In Asia the wheel had long been -known, and it had exercised rather a detrimental than an improving -influence on pottery, as the forms, settled by religious prejudices, or -venerable custom, did not change, but remained stationary. As soon as -the Greeks adopted the wheel--it must have been in use before Homer, -for he speaks of it--their better-trained minds brought a new spirit -into the handicraft of the potter, which was then turned into real art. - -Koroebos, of Athens, a mythic person, is said to have elevated keramic -art to high perfection. Dibutades is said to have been the first -modeller in clay, and Talos, his nephew, is mentioned as the inventor -of the potter's wheel in Hellas. - -With reference to the process of colouring we have two distinct classes -of Greek pottery:-- - -1. The _oligochromatic_, from {oligos} (small), and {chrôma} (colour). - -2. The _polychromatic_, from {polus} (many), and {chrôma} (colour). - -I. The _oligochromatic_ class of Greek pottery may be divided into two -distinct styles: _a._ The Archaic; _b._ The Hellenic. - -_A._ As soon as the wheel became generally used, a finer paste was -required, fit for exposure to a greater heat, and for the production -of a greater variety of vessels. In the beginning the paste was -coarse-grained and of a yellowish-grey; later it was fine, and the -colour homogeneous. The glazing was without lustre, brownish-black, -and spotted, proving a want of experience in baking. We have violet, -brownish-red, and white tints badly fixed on the black glaze. With -the exception of Pithoi (wine jars) found at Thera, the vessels -belonging to the Archaic style are generally of moderate size, broad -and compressed, with sudden and bold interruptions of the curves, and -abrupt unions of the extremities. The ornament is not yet an integral -part of the vessel. The general forms are cups, pots, flasks, &c., -all being entirely black. Some are ornamented with yellowish or white -points, or with simple lines drawn all over the vessel. By degrees a -clearer understanding of the laws of ornamentation is perceptible; -the ornamentation becomes restricted to the bulge, whilst rings, -meanders, and floral ornamentations mark the upper and lower parts -of the vessel. A further progress may be seen in the treatment of -ornamentation in the animals which surround the vessels in parallel -circles. Highly interesting are the flowers, balls, and _crosses_ -on these oligochromatic vases. With the progress of civilisation we -find the human figure introduced, surrounded, however, by monstrous -combinations of Asiatic origin. Genii, with and without wings, make -their appearance; then divinities amongst lions, panthers, ostriches, -and a profusion of symbolic representations. Swans are either -tamed, chased, or killed. The spirit of Persepolis and Nineveh, of -Phoenicia and Egypt, animates these pre-Homeric compositions; they are -entirely incomprehensible. This pottery of the Greeks is of the very -highest interest; we may advantageously study in it the progress of -civilisation amongst them. - -We have a period in which monster chases monster; then a period in -which men kill monsters; then, when men begin to settle down, and to -pass from the barbarous state of mere hunters into a more settled mode -of living, freed from obnoxious wild animals, they fight against men. -The conquerors have decidedly Aryan features, whilst the conquered -have unmistakably Turanian faces. (See the work of Lord Hamilton.) -At length we suddenly surprise them before the walls of Troy; the -incidents of the Iliad are known, and furnish the potters with heroic -subjects. Achilles and Hektor, Penelope and Ulysses, may be recognised; -the first two in deadly combat, the two latter meeting after a long -separation. The subject, in these Archaic vases and vessels, is not yet -thoroughly purified, for amongst the heroes we see Gorgons with spread -wings and lolling tongues. Other monsters, destroying animals, surround -the principal actors of the drama as mere unconcerned 'dummies.' -We accompany the development a step further, and observe that the -monsters have a share in the action; they seem to take part _pro_ and -_con_, like the gods in the Iliad, and, later, they appear in yet more -purified forms as protecting divinities. It is as if the Iliad had -first been drawn in clay by potters and improved upon, till at last it -was shaped in its divine form, and edited under the name of Homer. - -_B._ The Hellenic, or classic, style of Greek pottery, based on -the Archaic, shows great improvements in every direction. The -paste is harder, finer, and well glazed, and the colours are less -discordant. The red is of a fiery brightness, and the black without -any spots--sometimes with a greenish hue. In the decoration great -delicacy of shape and feeling is prominent. The figures are laid on -with anatomical accuracy. The limiting frame is dispensed with, giving -ampler scope to a freer and still more connected ornamentation. The -curves are less protruding, and the transition from concave to convex -lines is gentler. The canon of this period, that the vessel had to form -in all its parts one continuous line, rendered these products sometimes -stiff and over-regulated. The influence of the progress in the Attic -style, however, soon corrected this evil, and the potters of Greece -vied with the very best sculptors and painters in beautiful works. -The Asiatic types of winged or unwinged monsters were merely used as -grotesque or comical friezes, and soon began to disappear altogether, -to make room for some useful animal, and, finally, to give place to -frets or garlands of the most beautiful combinations. For the monstrous -creations of an overheated imagination, heroes, gods, and goddesses -were substituted. Perseus destroying Medusa; the Forge of Hephaistos; -a triclinium with Herakles and Alkmene, Hermes and Athene; diskoboli -and their teachers; Aphrodite at her toilette; Ares, Herakles, Athene, -and Zeus driven in their quadrigas by Nikê; Elektra at the tomb of -Agamemnon; Aphrodite crossing the sea on a swan; the blind Chiron -healed by Apollo; the weighing of Cupids--'young loves for sale;' and -rows of well-sketched warriors, representing the victories of valour, -beauty, and honesty over barbaric roughness, dishonesty, and despotism, -form the subjects of pictorial ornamentation. What an immense field -for the student of art to peruse, to fill his imagination with lively -classical scenes! - -II. The _polychromatic_ style took its origin in the very first -attempts in pottery, when white pipe-clay was painted over. The colours -used were red, violet, and yellow oxides of iron. At the period when -marble was introduced in architecture, and ivory in sculpture, during -the middle of the fifth century B.C., we find these highly-coloured -and richly-decorated vases. The paste was very fine, originally white, -and the colouring encaustic. Not only mineral pigments and metallic -oxides, but also vegetable colours, requiring only a very slow fire, -were known and used. The encaustic consisted of a polychromatic paste -more or less opaque, containing, in addition to wax, also flint, -whether as principal or secondary element it is difficult to decide. -This polychromatic treatment is to be observed on some smaller vessels, -and vases known under the name of Lekythus (with a narrow mouth), and -on saucers of large dimensions, the outsides having reddish figures -on black grounds, and the insides, coloured figures on white grounds. -Pottery led to fashioning in clay, and this to modelling in bronze and -sculpture. - -Architecture took its origin in religion, as also did sculpture. -Opposed to the inorganic, objective productions of human intellect, as -embodied in architecture, is spirit aspiring to a subjective existence -in sculpture. The inorganic sternness of architecture is far surpassed -by plastic art, which embodies spirit in a less fixed form. Spirit -is not yet absolutely free, for it requires a tangible body to show -its existence. Unlike music and painting, which by a mere movement -of the air, or a mixture of tints, produce bodies, plastic art has to -fill the three dimensions of space, and does this by means of coarse -matter--with clay, wood, bronze, or stone. - -Sculpture stands higher in the scale of art than architecture, for it -is not obliged to transform inorganic matter for a utilitarian purpose. - -At a certain period the Greeks were contented with shapeless -divinities; a pointed stone, a square piece of wood, the deformed root -of a tree, a pillar with a circular finish, or a cone, sufficed for -their piety. Even Plato indulged in the untenable proposition that art -was mere mimicry, and therefore a falsehood, and detrimental to virtue; -as truth ought to be the only aim of humanity. The Beautiful with -Plato was a mere abstraction, applicable exclusively to the absolute -'good'; artistic beauty was looked down upon by him as something bad -and altogether objectionable. The Kynic and Kyrenæic schools held to -a certain degree the opinions of Plato. The Kynics said that anything -good was beautiful--anything bad ugly; whilst the Kyrenæics propounded -that everything beautiful must be good--anything ugly must be bad; and -in this way the notions, good and bad, beautiful and ugly, changed -places. This dialectic difference led at last to Aristotle's deeper -appreciation of art. - -Aristotle, who rarely started from pre-conceived, _à priori_ ideas, -but attached his deep reasonings and admirable inductions to something -tangible and really existent, pronounced, in opposition to the -idealistic Plato, more correct thoughts on art. Imitation, mimicry -({mimêsis}), is with him the subjective formation or creation of -an idea, and therefore a process far superior to that of imperfect -reality; in fact it is a sublimated, idealised representation and -reproduction of reality. Next to the 'mimesis' he required purification -from all passion ({katharsis}) to be the aim and purpose of art. Genius -and imagination were the means by which alone a work of art could be -produced. The principal element in every work of art was with him -{êthos}, and wherever Ethos, the ethic or moral principle, was wanting, -the product failed to be artistic in the highest sense of the word. - -The development of Greek sculpture has borne out the sublime views of -Aristotle on art. As soon as the merely naturalistic and sensational -began to rule supreme, the Katharsis was neglected, the Ethic no longer -swayed works of art, and the Antique died out. - -The priests at Delphos, at a time when Greece abounded with the most -exquisite Apollo-statues, still held to a pointed pillar as the emblem -of the god of wisdom and the leader of the muses. Anthropomorphism -was long opposed by the hierarchy of Delphi, but they encouraged the -artists to produce beautiful vessels, tripods, lamps, sacrificial -basins, &c., which had to be made according to certain prescribed -forms. By degrees the Asiatic idea 'that God created man in his own -image' was inverted by the Greeks, 'and man began to create the gods in -his own image.' This one sentence embodies the cause of the progressive -development of Greek sculpture on the one hand, and the ever-stationary -forms of the East on the other. The Greeks had also idols that dropped -from heaven, puppet-like forms or symbolic carvings, like the Artemis -of Ephesus or the _four-armed_ Apollo of the Lakedemonians, reminding -us of Vishnu. - -The discoveries at Athens, Kyprus, and most recently at Hassarlik by -Dr. Schliemann, prove the gradual and slow progress of Greek sculpture -in all its different phases. The first Parthenon, destroyed by the -Persians, was adorned with divinities entirely different in shape -from those which surrounded it after it had been rebuilt 444 B.C. The -dresses, ornamentations, jewels, and pearls are of Assyro-Egyptian -and Indo-Persian patterns. The faces of the divinities show far more -of the Turanian than of the Aryan type. The eyes are protruding, -the cheek-bones high, the drapery is extremely stiff, the anatomy -doll-like, and the features bear a kind of repulsive grin. In the -gigantic, rock-hewn bull, near Smyrna, we have a proof that the Indian -Nundi and the Egyptian Apis must have had their worshippers in Greece. - -Of Daidalos it is reported that he was the first who improved upon -these symbolic carvings. He made winking gods and walking images -by means of mechanical contrivances. He is said to have been a -contemporary of Theseus; both belong therefore to the mythical period. -Though a statue of Herakles, holding in his right arm a club, whilst -his left extended bears a lion's skin as a shield, is attributed to -him; and though Homer mentions Daidalos, of Krete, as having wrought a -dance in metal for Ariadne, which formed the model for that wrought by -Hephaistos on the shield of Achilles; the fact that the very word to -'embellish' is taken from his name, points less to a distinct person -than to the period in which Greek art began to free itself from Asiatic -bondage. - -The historical periods into which we may group Greek sculpture -correspond to those of their architecture. - -First period, from the 8th century B.C. to the Persian wars, 470 B.C. - -Second period, from Kimon to the end of the Peloponnesian war, 470 -B.C.-400 B.C. - -Third period, from the delivery of Athens to the conquest of Greece -by the Romans, 400 B.C.-146 B.C. This third period comprises Greek -sculpture in its decline. - -Struggle into existence, growth and development, acme and decline, -follow in rapid succession. Wood-carvers and potters begin; then we -have a transition to bronze-works under _Glaukos_, who was the first to -solder the separate parts of the statues, which prior to him had been -always beaten into union. Following up this improvement, the artists -of Samos succeeded in making a clay-model, and then in covering it -with the fluid metal. As if by a supernatural charm the bright metal -statue grew out of the gloomy clay, and formed an everlasting monument -to adorn temples, squares, and streets. _Rhoekos_ and _Theodorus_ of -Samos, with _Smilis_, built the Labyrinth at Lemnos, which they adorned -with 150 columns, which were turned out by an ingenious mechanism, an -improvement on the art of casting in bronze. Pliny describes a bronze -figure by _Theodorus_, which held in its right hand a file, and in its -left a quadriga with a charioteer, which was so small that the car, -with the four horses and the driver, could be covered by the wing of -a fly. The celebrated ring of Polykrates, admirably wrought gold and -silver sacrificial vessels, and a vine with golden leaves and grapes -of precious stones, were also attributed to this artist. At Chios, the -birth-place of Glaukos, the family of _Mêlas_ worked for the first -time in Parian marble; whilst _Byzes_ of Naxos cut marble into thin -slabs for architectural purposes, giving a more exquisite finish to the -houses of the gods. On every side a marked improvement took place. The -head-dress of Apollo was still that of the Egyptian sphinx. The faces -of the statues were placid, mask-like, as if modelled separately and -then fixed on; the eyes looked as if first cut out, and then placed -into their sockets; but the anatomy of the body was treated with -greater care and a more refined feeling. The legs were close together -and the arms hung down perpendicularly, with a prescribed stiffness, -but there were details in the treatment of the stone surface, which -promised well for the future of Greek art, and the promise was most -faithfully kept. - -The struggling art freed itself from the fetters of stern canons. -Custom, struck by the lightning of genius, had to vanish, and life, -truth, and beauty as essential elements ruled the Greek mind. To -blend the isolated perfections of the two sexes into one became the -aim of Greek art. Women were sculptured with the colder lines of -manly firmness, and men received gentler forms through a less angular -treatment. The artists conscientiously purified their works from all -passions and second thoughts, expressing nothing that could divert -the mind from the simple admiration of idealised nature. At this -period they only succeeded in animating the limbs of their statues: -action was expressed with great power in strained muscles and swelling -veins. The faces were still without life, and without a comprehension -of those emotions which vibrate electrically in the countenances of -excited humanity. They could not yet petrify the thinking soul, but -they undoubtedly already succeeded in sculpturing the animated body to -perfection. - -The _second_ period was ushered in by the versatile and productive -talents of Onatas, Ageladas, Kalamis, Iphikrates, Pythagoras of Regium, -and Myron. Greece had attained her independence, the Persian hordes of -despotism were vanquished, and Athens enjoyed her hegemony. Freedom -and national exultation produced Sokrates, Plato, and Anaxagoras in -philosophy; Kimon, Perikles, and Themistokles in politics; Æschylus, -Sophokles, and Euripides in dramatic poetry; and Pheidias, Praxiteles, -and Skopas in sculpture. If we add to this fourfold triad Herodotus, -Thukydides, and Xenophon, we have given an array of names each of -which singly would have filled the world with its fame, and become a -landmark in the progressive development of humanity. Athens was at -this period the most brilliant centre of intellectual and artistic -life. Men were inspired by the general animation; they began to modify -old thoughts, to transform eîdola, and to give birth to numberless -productions which in beauty and striving for truth surpassed anything -attempted before. Schools of arts vied with the schools of wrestlers, -poets, and thinkers, and all excited the dramatists to their grand -conceptions, which again reacted on plastic art. Under these influences -the imaginary theogony yielded to a more scientific inquiry into -the origin of all things, which led to the recognition of the first -incomprehensible, immutable, eternal cause, no longer based on mere -belief, but on the immovable rock of scientific conviction. No wonder -that art was also inspired by this spiritual movement. The conceptions -of the priests and philosophers were to be loudly proclaimed in visible -forms, and the sculptor, from a deep feeling of veneration for the -Supreme Artist of the Universe, became the expounder of the divinity, -and the exclusive high priest of beauty and truth. Instead of singing -Vedantic hymns or Egyptian psalms and litanies to the glory of God, -the Greek sculptors hewed the gods in majestic forms, and every touch -of their chisels on the lifeless marble, every blow of their hammers, -became an eternally resounding prayer in honour of God. - -Wood, metal, clay, precious stones, and marble had by degrees yielded -to the creative power of the Greek masters; and matter could no longer -resist in any way their ruling intellectual force. At this moment, -under these circumstances, Pheidias, the son of Charmides of Athens, -the pupil of Hegias and Ageladas, stepped forward, and was raised by -the superiority of his genius to the dignity of king of Greek plastic -art. The Zeus of Olympia and the Athene of the Parthenon qualified -Pheidias as _the_ sculptor of the concrete _form_ of the divinity; -for if the father of the gods had had a visible form, and his wisdom -and intellect had been incarnate in Athene, both must have looked as -they were sculptured by Pheidias. In symbolic emblems he poetically -expressed the powers of the two divinities; and used the mineral, the -vegetable, and animal kingdoms to glorify their power. - -Nothing is left us of these two master-pieces but the glowing -descriptions of those who saw and admired them. That which a -combination of thousands of our artists, with all our technical -advancement, can scarcely accomplish; the drawing of thousands and -thousands of _intellectual_ human beings together to admire their works -of art; was done by Pheidias. Men flocked from all parts of the world -to see and admire his statues, and to offer fervent thanks to the -Father of all for having endowed one of his creatures with the power to -give a correct form to Homer's lines: - - He (Zeus) spoke, and awful bends his sable brows; - Shakes his ambrosial curls and gives the nod, - The stamp of fate, and sanction of the god; - High heaven with trembling the dread signal took, - And all Olympus to the centre shook. - -We possess in the Vatican a copy of the original head of the Jupiter, -and what a master-piece even this _bad_ copy is! What a power in the -bold, arched brows; the large eyes with their benevolent, forgiving, -and yet commanding glance; the full, parted lips ready to bless -and to forgive; the luxuriant beard, the mighty locks inspiring -veneration, and the beautifully-rounded cheeks, expressive of creative -force and eternal manly beauty! The independent works of Pheidias -were very numerous. Besides the two colossal divinities of bronze -(Athene Promachos, 50 feet high, and Athene {hê Lêmnia}), we find -twelve others mentioned: of these, six were statues of Athene; one -colossal Apollo of bronze, 70 feet high; one marble Hermes; three of -Aphrodite (two of marble, and one of ivory and gold); a mother of the -gods, material unknown; and an Asklepios (Æsculapius) of gold and -ivory. Of sacrificial statues, a group of thirteen bronze figures, in -commemoration of the victory of Marathon, is mentioned as having been -executed by him. In this work twelve mythical characters surrounded -_one_ historical figure--that of Miltiades; a proof that the Greeks -attributed their victory far more to the help of the gods than to the -exertions of their leaders. They were much more inclined to adorn -the courts of their temples and their public places with the statues -of orators, wrestlers, poets, artists, and philosophers, than with -those of men who, in defending their country against invading hordes -of barbarians, did their duty and nothing more. What a scope for our -artists if we were to adorn our town-halls, courts of justice, our -museums, universities, academies, public places, and churches with the -statues of those who had devoted their energies to religion, oratory, -science, art, politics, and the general welfare of their country! If -gratitude were to prompt us to do this, and not childish vanity or -egotistical pride, we should shortly have many Pantheons with excellent -sculptures. - -In no town in Europe can the artist study the sculptural splendour -of ancient Greece with greater ease than in London. Of the ninety-two -metopes which adorned the Parthenon on the Akropolis at Athens we -possess seventeen; of the frieze of the cella 3-1/5 feet high and -524 feet long, representing the Panathenaic procession, we possess -fifty-three plates and casts of the whole western side. In all -these sculptures what a clear power of grouping, what a variety of -characters, what handsome men and women! The flower of Athens is seen -assembled to do homage in joyous excitement to the supreme divinity of -the State, the embodiment of wisdom and intellect. Some are crowned -with wreaths; others carry sun-shades, chairs, splendid pitchers, -ornamented vases, or decorated pateras; some are ready to start; -others, preparing in animated haste to take their places, are in the -act of mounting their prancing horses, or, already mounted, eagerly -await the arrival of their friends. On the eastern side, under the -entrance to the temple, there was an admirable group of gods and -goddesses, in whose presence _peplus_, or sacred veil, is delivered to -the authorities of the temple; animals are led to be sacrificed--flute -and kythara-players follow. Amongst the hundreds and hundreds of -figures not one is like the other; the exquisite variety in the folds -of the dresses of the sitting, standing, walking, riding, driving -groups is in general unsurpassed for beauty of design, and perfection -of execution. None of the figures are raised more than _three_ inches -from the background, and yet the most correct perspective is observed. -There is such a softness and truthfulness, such a firmness and ideal -vitality in this frieze, that we may at least attribute the composition -to Pheidias himself. Some plates of the western side are less excellent -in execution; the forms are marked with roughness and dryness, and some -faults in the outlines are also apparent to the critic. Some of the -horses have legs too long, and bodies too thin; in one of the horses, -which is bending its neck to rub its head against one of its fore feet, -the curves are much too stiff. The execution of these reliefs must have -been left to some inferior artist. What we must admire is, that there -are so few faults. The correct study of this frieze ought to serve us -as an example in grouping, and would teach us how to arrange a marble -strip round some monument for the sake of decoration. Little of this -influence, however, is to be observed in our sculptors. We intend -to evolve sculpture from our own inner consciousness, and neglect -these ancient books with their glorious poems in Pentelic marble; we -prefer '_going to nature_' as the popular phrase runs, and ignore or -despise the study of the antique. Now the Greeks had an opportunity of -going to real nature--not with the darkened eye of Asiatic prejudice, -despising matter and exalting _spirit_--but with a prejudice in the -very opposite direction, cultivating spirit only so far as it served -to embellish and to reproduce form. In this they attained perfection, -and to surpass them in sculpture is after all impossible; we can only -try to equal them, and to learn from what they have left us, to produce -other combinations. In this spirit we ought to study the nine figures -from the eastern pediment of the Parthenon, in the British Museum. -What forms, what exquisite drapery! The finest tissue of pliable -stuff is reproduced in hard Pentelic marble. The drapery disguises, -and at the same time reveals, the beautiful forms of the human frame. -Softness and sensationalism were equally avoided by Pheidias and his -school. The study of anatomy was not yet degraded to coarse realism. -It was not yet the aim of Greek sculptors to distort the human body -so as to exhibit expanded muscles, over-strained sinews, and swelling -veins, as expressions of pain, grief, distress, or contortions of -the death-agony. Anatomy served Pheidias as a mould, into which he -poured his beautiful conceptions--the spiritualised forms of gods and -men. Katharsis was the principle of his school. The very heights of -perfection were reached by Pheidias, Polykletus, and Alkemenes. Gods -and goddesses were the subjects of their chisels. They were not only -the high-priests of art--but inspired prophets, to whom divine beauty -was revealed in all its brightness and splendour. - -The existence of the Greek State was suddenly shaken to its very -foundation. Internal dissensions weakened the safety of the citizens; -sophistry destroyed philosophy, and mannerism grasped Greek art, -dragged it down from its heights of idealised beauty and hurled it -into the abyss of sensational realism. The best specimen of this -school is the frieze from the temple of Apollo at Bassæ, near Phigalia -in Arkadia. (Found 1812, now in the British Museum.) It represents -Kentaurs fighting with Amazons. The old Indian Ghandarvas, the moist -and heavy clouds that hinder the sun from breaking forth in all his -glory, and are conquered by his fiery shafts, became in time monsters, -half-men, half-horses, fighting against loveliness and civilisation. -The Amazons in this instance represent fair Greece rushing into civil -strife. Passion is predominant in action and expression. Amazons are -dragged by the hair and by the legs from their horses; a Kentaur is -seen biting a warrior in the shoulder. Bold naturalism and vulgar -realism go hand-in-hand in these sculptures. How sensitive art is--how -faithfully it reflects the social condition of a nation! and the -feelings by which the artists were pervaded may be studied in this -frieze. The nude is treated with exquisite truthfulness, but there is -heaviness in the sudden, too violent movements. Action and expression -lose the balance of the symmetrical. The women are common; their -drapery floating and yet stiff, deranged for the sake of effect. The -artists worked no more with love and security. The political party -spirit troubled their imagination. The chisel trembled with rage or -fear, with hatred or passion, in their hands; they saw prophetically -the national downfall of their country, and with it science, art, -poetry, and philosophy were to be rendered for thousands of years -houseless and homeless. - -Once more art revived under Skopas, Praxiteles, and Lysippus, but in -a totally different shape. Greece had lost through her civil war the -proper balance between her moral and intellectual forces. Simplicity -and refinement of thought had vanished. In literature metaphors -prevailed; in politics Aristides had to yield to the double-tongued -Alkibiades; in tragedy Sophokles was superseded by Euripides; in -sculpture the immortal Pheidias was followed by Praxiteles. The -national spirit of the Greeks, inspired by common interests, swayed by -the very highest aspirations in arts and sciences, suddenly collapsed -into a narrow-minded, particularising egotism. Tribes cared only -for tribes, parties for parties. The public buildings began to be -neglected, whilst the private dwellings gained in ornamentation and -comfort, what was denied to the grand national enterprises. The public -places were no longer adorned with the statues of those who had gained -the general approbation of the masses. The artist, doubtful whom to -please, tried to please everyone, or to satisfy the individual fancy -of a paying patron. Art was no more the chaste virgin sacrificing to -beauty, but became a courtesan seeking general and special favour -at all hazards. The divinities were no more the representations of a -spiritual eîdolon, but a glowing sentiment of sensual love was poured -over their frames; they were no longer ideal conceptions in marble, but -beautiful flesh forms in stone or bronze. They lost all generalisation, -they were more correct in the anatomical outlines, but a passionate -sentiment of sensuality thrilled through every point. Kephisodotus -(the elder), probably the father of Praxiteles, embodied the change in -Greek thought in a beautiful group. Eirene (peace) fondles the child -Pluton (riches)--a splendid allegorical representation of the political -condition of Greece at this time. 'Let us put an end to our quarrels; -let us have peace, and enjoy life once more.' - -Skopas, born on the island of Paros, expressed the modern flow of ideas -in Greece with greater clearness. Violent scenes of deadly struggle -filled the pediments of the temple of Athene Alea at Tegea. In front, -the hunt of the Kalydonian boar by Herakles, at the back Achilles -fighting with Telephos was represented. An under-current of thought, -a kind of allegory, may be traced in this composition, for the boar -to be hunted was the opposition. Art was no longer to exalt the mind -unconditionally, but to fulfil another purpose--to irritate, to excite -to hatred, and to arouse passion; thus placed, art must lose its -civilising influence, and it did this step by step. Even the divinities -sculptured by Skopas were not to inspire veneration, but to please -by little allegorical additions; his Apollo (Smintheus) stood on a -mouse; Apollo, the leader of the muses, the representative of vivifying -light in art, science, and the universe, degraded to a beautiful -'_mouse-killer_.' Aphrodite, the mother of humanity, was sculptured -sitting on a goat--the vilest emblem of passion in union with the -purest eîdolon of tender love. Another Apollo was represented in the -long waving robes of an elegant Grecian lady playing the lyre; this was -still more objectionable. Though the drapery excites our admiration -by its exquisite softness and finish, the statue appears to have been -chiselled to show the artist's skill in carving a heap of waving -drapery. Whenever art condescends to such tricks it is on the high-road -to degradation. Skopas composed a splendid group for a pediment, -representing Achilles receiving from his mother the arms forged by -Hephaistos. The principal figures are Thetis, the queen of the bright -green waves, Poseidon, and Achilles; they are surrounded by a crowd of -Nereids and Tritons, all in harmonious arrangement. Richer in grouping -are some marble reliefs (now in the Glyptothek at Münich), representing -the wedding of Poseidon and Amphitrite. The mother of the bride, Doris, -is seated on a Hippokamp (sea-horse), holding two torches towards the -couple; Tritons play on shells and lyres a merry wedding tune. Nereids -surround them. One rides on a sea-bull, led by a mischievous-looking -Eros, standing on its left fore-foot; another, mounted on a fantastic -sea-monster, is accompanied by another, borne by a Triton; other -Nereids follow, pointing towards the principal group, one sitting -on a Hippokamp, with an Eros on its curled tail; a dragon carrying -a Nereid is led with self-conscious pride by another Eros, whilst a -Triton carries another sea-nymph on his winding body with placid and -contented looks. The composition in general, and in all its details, -is perfect. Without over-crowding the allotted space, it could not be -better filled up. There is a striking freedom in the lines, and lively -contrast of forms. We may consider this relief the prototype of all -those fantastic compositions of the pure renaissance style, in which we -see dragons and monsters, bulls and horses, entwined with plants and -flowers, nymphs and gods, everything real and imaginary, beautiful and -graceful, united into one great dissonant harmony. Skopas was the first -(so far as we know) who sculptured Venus in the full beauty of her nude -body. Pheidias would have considered such a treatment of the mother -of mankind blasphemy. In a group of Eros, Himeros, and Pothos (Love, -Longing, and Desire), we find a classification of a general feeling -into three distinct subdivisions, executed with conscious discernment -in order to produce a sensational effect. A raving Bacchante appears to -rush away with dishevelled hair, in flowing robes; the head is thrown -backwards in delirious delight; the marble lives and breathes maddening -joy, but is vivified with sensual feelings, and not inspired with the -elevating spirit of artistic simplicity and purity. - -Of this period we may study another master-piece in the British Museum; -the frieze of the tomb of Mausolos at Halikarnassus. The greater part -is in London and the remainder at Genoa. The subject is a battle -between Greeks and Amazons. The composition is nearly as good as -that on the Parthenon. There is a continuous symmetrical stream of -action and reaction, as in the dashing waves of a stormy sea. _Skopas_ -worked the eastern, _Bryaxis_ the northern, _Timeotheos_ the southern, -and _Leochares_ the western side. Many mistakes may be found in the -details, but the whole is a master-piece of manly thought;--it may be -said to have been the _last manly_ product of the period. - -_Praxiteles_ altogether turned the scale; Aphrodite, Demeter, -Persephone, Flora, Eros, Dionysius, and Apollo, are the divinities -mostly sculptured by him. Everything is smooth, young, and effeminate. -All harshness of line is avoided, all loftier ideas discarded. The -flesh become stone is placed before us in charming and full roundness. -Aphrodite was no longer draped--but with the concealing drapery the -higher conception of the divinity fled. Venus, conscious of her charms, -with a smile on her lips, and a coquettish movement of her hand, sinks -to the level of an every-day woman. Venus had eaten of the tree of -knowledge; with the consciousness of her particular womanly charms the -ideal of divine universality was gone. - -We possess of Praxiteles, an Eros in the Vatican, and his celebrated -Apollo with the lizard (Saurokthonos) in the Louvre. Both these statues -are more women than men. The lines are too soft; the bodies as though -without muscles or bones, composed only of flesh and fat. It is true -that the older artists also softened down the too marked lines of the -sexes, and in blending them together created ideal forms of beauty; but -now the mere surface of the woman's body was used for both sexes, to -affect the senses exclusively. - -Three groups (the one probably for the pediment of a temple, the other -two forming independent works of art) deserve special mention. - -The group of Niobe and her dying children, attributed to Skopas or -Praxiteles. Greece was fast sinking. _Niobe-Greece_ sees her children -struck down one after the other by the inexorable decree of the -gods, who are bent on punishing the _proud mother_ who only cared -for the _outward_ beauty of her children, and neglected their moral -_inner_ grandeur. Niobe, amidst a harmonious confusion of misery and -endless woe, stands erect, and presses the youngest child to herself, -turning her proud looks upwards, her eyes filled with tears of heroic -resignation--for she knows the gods have willed her downfall, and -their will is unalterable. This moment of agony, of mental rather than -bodily suffering, makes the group a master-piece of antique beauty and -grandeur. - -This cannot be said of the sensational Laokoön, the joint work of -Agesander, Athenodorus, and Polydoros (of which there is a copy in -the Vatican), and the so-called 'Farnese Bull,' the joint work of -Apollonios and Tauriskos (a copy of which exists in the museum at -Naples). Bodily anguish is the dominating element in these two groups. -If it were the province of art to depress the soul, and to fill us with -pain and horror, nothing could surpass the technical skill with which -these two are arranged. - -In the first we have:-- - -1. In the father a stifled _death scream_. - -2. In the younger son, to the right, the last _convulsions_ of a dying -boy. - -3. In the elder son, to the left, an unbounded _horror_ at witnessing -the frightful death of father and brother. - -There is no psychological necessity in this group to indemnify us for -the pathological and anatomical truthfulness of so great an amount of -horrible suffering. Art has never to serve as a hospital ward, and to -force us to witness the contortions of a poor family dying poisoned -by strychnine or arsenic. Not less objectionable is the revenge of -a mother and her two sons on a defenceless woman. In this group we -have:-- - -1. The horror-stricken, half-dying, half-imploring look of poor Dirkê. - -2. The merciless glance of the jealous Antiope, wrapt in placid -satisfaction to see herself revenged on her rival. - -3. The ferocious anger of the two passionate sons; and, lastly, - -4. The wild look of the furious bull, ready to dash the beautiful frame -of a frail woman to pieces. Dramatic justice is here meted out by the -artist in a most revolting way. A bull is called in to help to punish; -it is the vulgarity of the cruel revenge that degrades the technically -masterly work of art. The free grouping of marble statues is one of the -most difficult tasks, and was never attempted during the classic period -of ancient art. A mixture of men and animals is even more to be avoided. - -As soon as the gods of Egypt changed their architectural and monumental -position, they lost their sway over the superstitious masses; as soon -as the Greeks lost that balance of morality, which, in the form of the -beautiful, regulated their life, science, and art, they lost at the -same time their productive power. Form and idea as in Asia came into -conflict; the _formal_ had attained the extreme of perfection, and the -new _ideas_ had not yet ripened. - -Art was either to touch the feelings or to speak to reason--it was -to be based on a mere imitation of nature, or to be the expression -of some thought in some form. This 'either,'--'or,'--or this -'neither,'--'nor,' which divided art-critics during this period, made -an end of art altogether. The Asiatics rent the universe asunder -with conflicting abstractions based on the phenomena of nature; the -Greeks lost their power, when they once recognised that there was -something higher than the mere _form_. A new sphere was felt to open -new spiritual beauties--but this sphere was to be attained through -totally different means. The formal was however so highly developed by -the Greeks that we shall see the new spirit, after more than a thousand -years, become incarnate in those forms. - -We see then clearly that art, the product of the creative force of -men, requires a certain moral and intellectual condition, under which -alone it can actively live. Change the moral temperature through the -superstitions of a terrified populace, the aspect of nature, the -despotic organisation of government, or the rule of a wild, uneducated -mob, and the artistic force will also change or die out altogether. The -artist acts only to a certain degree on the public; the public reacts -with a greater combined _vis inertiæ_ on the artist, who is merely the -reflection of certain ideas floating in the intellectual atmosphere -around him. Is a man who sees nothing but emaciated, beggarly, or -sanctimonious faces, thin limbs, hungry looks, dwellings bare of -all domestic comfort, decayed brick-houses and crumbling walls, to -paint convivial scenes of happiness and joy? Or let him change this -atmosphere and live in a sphere of so-called respectability; having -always the same bland smile before him, the same trimmed whiskers, the -same business-like self-contentment, the same stiff collars and cuffs; -hearing the same stereotyped, insignificant phrases about the weather -or the funds, the price of coals or meat--will he, influenced by such -an atmosphere, not draw or paint only caricatures, and never grand -and heart-stirring historical paintings, recording in glowing colours -scenes full of life, excitement, passion, and dramatic action? In such -surroundings it is necessary for an artist to create for himself a -world of his own--an intellectual world--by turning to the glorious -records of the past, and devoting every spare hour to the study of -the ancients and the reading of history. His imagination, deadened -by reality, must be fed and nourished by the poets, poetry, works of -art, and historical facts of the past. Our meagreness and poverty in -artistic productions take their origin in our unpardonable neglect -of the study of history; through this neglect we have deprived art -altogether of its firmest basis. - -The very moment that the Greek artists lost their historical and -poetical ground, they took to and excelled in painting barbers' and -shoemakers' shops; oyster shells, vases, little combinations of chairs -and musical instruments, and small things, with great accuracy. In -fact the same causes produced the same pictorial effects; the mind -of the Greek nation had dwindled, and their works of art embraced -decorations of household furniture and pottery. In these ornamentations -the reminiscences of a by-gone age may be traced; they are still -symmetrical to the highest degree, plants are still treated with -great conventional freedom, but the Greeks only worked as skilful -workmen--artists they produced no more. - - - - -CHAPTER IX. - -ETRUSKAN ART. - - -The first question that here suggests itself is, who were the -Etruskans? Their name Tuskan, from Tuisko, points at once to an Aryan -branch of Teutonic race. But ethnologists differ. Some say they were -Phoenicians, others assert they were Egyptians; some that they were -pure Teutons, and others that they were pure Kelts. Taking their old -pottery into consideration, as given in Lord Hamilton's admirable -plates, or in the collection of the Museum at Clusium (Chiusi), we are -induced to pronounce the aborigines of Etruria to have been Turanians, -conquered by immigrant Aryans. This mixture of Aryans and Mongols under -the influence of a totally different aspect of nature, on a different -soil, under different social and religious conditions, produced a type -quite different from the Greek--a kind of transition link between the -Pelasgians and the Romans. - -Two distinct immigrations of Aryans into Etruria are recorded. The -first about 1650 B.C., when Pelasgians and Thyrrenians settled amongst -the aborigines; and the second, 400 years before Herodotus, about the -times of Thales and Lykurgus. Of the first immigration we have scarcely -any relics; the second time the immigrants succeeded in forming an -organised social state; they brought with them Greek mythological -notions, and a kind of Greek writing. Their language and writing -died out after Augustus, and disappeared altogether before Julian, -fourth century A.D. Nature forced them to industry and enterprise. -The Etruskans had to cultivate their fields by individual exertion; -in spring they had to ward off the devastating waters of overflowing -rivers, and in summer they had to provide water for their parched -valleys. They consequently became masters in constructing aqueducts and -irrigating the land, at an early period. - -Their mythology was composed of Assyrian, Persian, and Egyptian -notions, strongly tinged with gloomy superstitions. Petrifactions of -the most astonishing forms abound in the plains where they settled. -Near Cortona the bones of a whale have been found. The Arno valley -resembles a vast elephant burial-place; and the bones of the mastodon, -rhinoceros, and hippopotamus, are scattered broadcast all over old -Etruria, and are still used to fence in the fields. Besides the bones -of these huge monsters, those of hyænas, panthers, bears, and wolves -are found in such abundance, that the peasants to this very day believe -they grew like mushrooms over night, having been sown by invisible -spirits to give the poor the trouble of picking them up. The aspect -of nature and the remains of an antediluvian world gave the Etruskan -priesthood an irresistible sway over the minds of the people. Whilst in -Greece, under the influence of a happy aspect of nature, the Indian, -Assyrian, and Egyptian embodiments of the forces of nature lost their -fearful forms; in Etruria they gained even more gloomy and melancholy -figures in the presence of everlasting thunder and lightning, and -volcanic disturbances. - -The Etruskans had two sets of gods. - -_a._ The veiled gods, with '_Asar_' at their head, representing the -cosmognical forces of nature; especially fire, water, earth, and ether, -like the divinities of India and Egypt. - -_b._ Twelve lower divinities presiding over the order of existing -and visible things. Their gods have a great resemblance to those of -the Scandinavians, uniting in one distinct chain the Aryans on the -Ganges, those on the Nile, and those round the Delphic oracle, with the -Hyperboreans of the farthest north. They all believed in an 'inferno,' -only with the Greeks this was an Elysium, a land of shadows, a land of -happiness. The divinities of the Etruskans were phantoms of horror. -The whole of their creed was devoid of a comforting union between gods -and men. This despairing faith impressed the people with a ferocious -character. Their art under such impressions never could reach the -beautiful. A tribe of whom it has been said that their priests -attacked the Romans with hissing serpents and burning torches--a tribe -that crouched in fear before invisible gods, and hated every other -tribe--could never take an interest in the gentler emotions produced by -poetry or art. They remembered the Greek expedition against Thebes, and -adorned their _burial_ urns with scenes from the battle at Marathon; -they commemorated the heroic deed of a ploughman, who, in the midst of -the battle, took up his plough and drove the Persians before him like -a flock of frightened sheep, whilst the Greeks remembered the deed in -mentioning _Echetlos_ in connection with Marathon, but possessed no -record of the fact on any of their monuments. The Etruscans, however, -delighted in such scenes. At their funerals they had no dances, but -sanguinary fights. - -No less than twelve different thunderbolts were known to them. They -believed in a thunderbolt of prophecy, one of authority, one of law, -one of wish, one of admonition, one of approval, one of help, one of -prosperity, one of falsehood, one of plague, one of threats, and one -of murder. Every transaction in life, with the best or the worst of -mankind, might have been accompanied by an approving or disapproving -thunder-clap. They firmly believed the thunderbolts used by the Supreme -Deity were all manufactured in the fiery interior of Mount Ætna. They -possessed no ritual of the dead like the Egyptians, but a thunderbolt -ritual. Every day of the year that brought thunder had its special -signification. All the veiled gods, and _nine_ of the secondary gods, -had the power of thundering. - -Their conception of angry, jealous, persecuting, thundering, and -lightning divinities has much in common with the Jewish and Phoenician -ideals of the Supreme Deity. This peculiarity the Northerns shared in -their conception of Thor. The Etruskan belief, that aërolites were -thunderbolts sent by the angels against the Titans, has a great analogy -with the Persian legends assuming these to have been hurled by the -Fervers against the Devas. - -Their superior divinities are, like the kings or priests of Persia, -Assyria, and Babylon, provided with wings. Jupiter, Diana, Minerva -(a kind of female Mercury with the Etruskans, who had wings not only -on her shoulders, but also on her feet) and Venus were all winged; -others, like Proserpina (Persephone), Amor (Eros), and the Furies, had -wings on their heads. White and black winged genii (angels and demons) -are plentiful in the subterranean tombs of the old Etruskan town, -Tarquinium. According to Dempster, their cars even are often provided -with wings. What was a metaphor with the Greeks was turned by the -Etruskans into matter-of-fact. Euripides in his 'Orestes' speaks of the -winged car of Phoebus, and on some Eleusian coins Ceres is seen sitting -in a winged car, drawn by two serpents. - -From a gloomy contemplation of supernatural matters the Etruskans -turned their minds to extremely worldly and practical purposes. -They wished to secure their towns and to protect them against real -and imaginary monsters, and they constructed excellent walls and -most comfortable houses. The '_cavoedium_' ('cavum oedium'), with the -_impluvium_ and _compluvium_ (the one for collecting and the other for -preserving water), was altogether an Etruskan invention, and was called -by the Romans who adopted it, _Tuscanicum_. They constructed temples -differing only in some details from those of the Greeks. The cella was -generally _square_; sometimes they had more than one cella; one in the -Postica and one in the Antica (the rear and front of the temple). The -portico was often filled with columns. The architectural style was a -rough and primitive Doric. They never attained the majestic simplicity -which distinguished this order in Greece. The columns had a base, were -more slender (about fourteen moduli), stood more apart, and supported a -wooden roof with clumsily-protruding beams, an unwieldy cornice, and a -high pediment. - -Cinerary chests they had in abundance with divinities on them, worked -in reliefs of a decidedly Egyptian type. They used brazen tablets -representing Osiris and Isis. Little clay figures were put into the -graves to protect the dead. Amongst these has been found a winged -Harpokrates or Horus, with the fore-finger of one hand on his lips, a -lotus on his head, and a cornucopia in his other hand. - -Their ancient pottery is more in the Egyptian than the Greek style. -Their jars represent sphinxes and women; their drinking cups are in -the form of human legs, with human faces replacing the knee; some are -in the form of Mercury with a pointed, attached beard, like those -to be seen in Egyptian divinities. Some of the patterns of their -ornamentation, in general as well as in detail, are perfectly Mexican. -On one of their lamps we have a winged Kentaur holding a rabbit, whilst -four rabbits running after one another, form the spirited ornamentation -of the border, intermixed with triangles, rosettes, or solar circles. - -With their religious notions, it is not surprising that the Etruskans -should have devoted the greatest care to their tombs and burial-places. - -These tombs were:-- - -1. _Subterranean_; hewn into the tufa on plains. Steps led underground, -where a vestibulum, consisting of several chambers, sometimes provided -with columns, led into the vault. The ceiling of this was either -horizontal or pointed, in imitation of a wooden roof. Many such tombs -are found at Volci, Clusium, and Volaterra. - -2. A second species of their subterranean tombs consisted of those -_provided with tumuli_ above-ground; simple graves as found in -Scandinavia and the north of the Western hemisphere, the corpses lying -on simple stone beds. - -3. _Burial chambers_ (cucumella) with artificial hills above them, and -provided with a tower-like construction, or with conical columns. They -are found near Volci, Tarquinii, and Viterbo. - -4. _Chambers, vertically hewn into the rocks_, with a simple or -decorated entrance near Tuskania. - -5. Rock-hewn chambers _with façades screening the entrance_, as at -Aria, or with Doric fronts as at Orchia. Asia furnished patterns for -the decoration and construction of these tombs. The reliefs are full -of lively scenes, reminding us of Assyrian and Babylonian sculptures. -The figures are heavy, the legs short and thick; the upper part of the -statues is placed 'en face,' whilst the legs and feet are in profile. -The monstrous element predominates. Harpies, chimeras, winged lions, -sphinxes, and griffins abound; but they are void of any symmetrical -arrangement, and are dry, stiff, and as revolting as possible in their -coarse outlines. - -With regard to the construction of their walls it is remarkable that -they improved very early on the Kyklopean mode, and constructed the -very best regular freestone walls. They had arched gates, built with -wedge-shaped stones, which produced by their span a firmly-vaulted -construction. The Etruskans thus acquired a lasting merit in the -history of art by the new epoch which they inaugurated with the -introduction of this decidedly progressive element in the technical -construction of architectural works. As _potters_ and _metal-workers_ -they distinguished themselves more than either as architects or -sculptors. As the Chinese are considered as the potters _par -excellence_ of the farthest East, the Etruskans may be called the -potters of the West. In burning, painting, and fashioning clay they -appear to have acquired a speciality, so that their trade in vases -extended all over the then known world, and even the Greeks furnished -their houses with Etruskan pottery in preference to their own. The -gloomy mythology of the Etruskans was far better suited to potters, -manufacturing black vases with red figures, or red vases with black -figures, or for casting dark bronze figures, than to sculptors handling -white marble. They also distinguished themselves in chiselling and -founding metal. Innumerable chests, candelabra, metal frames for -looking-glasses, and other utensils show their cleverness in working -gold, silver, and bronze. Some ivory carvings, described in a report -of the Archæological Society at Rome, 1862, are of great interest. -They were found at Præneste (Palestrina), where also silver vessels in -the purest Egyptian style, and an ivory tablet with Assyrian patterns, -were excavated. More important even than these discoveries are four -ivory tablets found at Corneto, showing traces of gilding and painting. -The carvings represent scenes of every-day life, mixed with mystic -figures. We see on the tablets a lady and gentleman sitting at dinner, -served by a little boy; a huntsman chasing game; a kind of sea-divinity -holding in each hand a fish; and a man in a biga driving winged horses. -These figures might have formed representations concerning the zodiac, -namely: the Twins, Sagittarius, Pisces, and the Sun (Phoebus or Horus). -The receding forehead of the driver and his manner of holding the whip -are types which we constantly meet in Egyptian sculptures and reliefs. - -About 660 B.C. Eucheir, Diopos, Eugrammos and Demeratos were driven -from Korinthum into Etruria, and from that date we note a decided -improvement in the artistic productions. The Etruskans began to excel -in terra-cotta and bronze works. Their vases, amphoræ, statuettes, -cinerary and mystic chests, prove this. Their mystic chests (cistæ -mysticæ, corresponding to the quippa-chests of the Mexicans) were made -of embossed bronze. The lids were ornamented with mysterious animals, -and the legs formed of the claws or paws of mythical brutes. Foliage -and Greek frets in good arrangement were also used. Their candelabra -are of a superior design. Other works of art, such as ornamented backs -and handles for mystic mirrors, in gold, silver, or bronze, are of -excellent technical execution. - -There was, however, too much of the aborigine Turanian element left in -the Etruskans. The noble and elevating rhythmus of Greek idealisation -is everywhere wanting. Cooking utensils, small pieces of furniture, -tables, chairs, and couches, aqueducts and viaducts, and even cloacas, -were made and constructed to perfection, but as soon as they attempted -the production of human forms, or of higher works in architecture, -they did not succeed. The heads of their figures are either too small -or too large. The legs are short; the drapery in stiff lines hangs -down with rope-like regularity. Animals are much better executed; -but the human form, in consequence of a scrupulous and constrained -conception, and an exaggerated attention to detail, had a cold, -lifeless appearance, void of all spiritual animation. Their imagination -was one-sidedly directed by nature and religion to take a gloomy and -distorted view of creation, and their products bear this spiritual -stamp. In everything they touched we recognise the Egyptian mythology -with its stifling breath, and the influence of the volcanic ground -on which the Aryans were thrown, amongst a number of superstitious -Turanians. The rumbling, fire-spitting Vesuvius and Ætna worked on the -brains of the new immigrants. The sudden, devastating bursts of fire -and water filled their minds with horror; they were forced to ponder -over the instability of human things. The beauty of the Italian sky, -the exuberant luxury of the vegetation, heightened in them a feeling of -dumb despair. The contrast between life and death was too striking, and -filled the souls of the artists with awe and dread, reflected in their -artistic compositions. - -Their representations were often divided into two distinct -compartments. On one side were scenes from the lower regions. Mantus, -Mania, and furies pursuing the deceased with hammers. Mantus of the -Etruskans, probably a descendant of Radamanthus, was an infernal -divinity. Mania (whose name we have preserved in the words _mania_ -and _maniac_) was the mother of the Lares and persecuted the dead. -Our readers must begin to see whence many of the horrifying scenes -of the middle ages took their origin. On the other side were scenes -from life in the upper regions--joyous, triumphal processions and -festivities. Drunkenness and licentiousness are always twin-sisters of -superstition and bigotry. These arrangements recall the same custom of -dividing subjects in antithetical groups observed in Assyria, where -we find on the slabs hunts in the upper compartments, and joyous -festivities in the row below. The subjects chosen with the Assyrians -were undoubtedly much healthier. Hard work first, and joy and happiness -afterwards. The Etruskans kept to the old Egyptian customs, reminding -man continually of the short duration of his life. The mummy placed -in Egyptian banqueting halls, with the inscription: 'Eat and drink; -such a one wilt thou be,' had a pernicious ethical effect; instead of -sobering man down, it drove him to reckless and despairing gaiety and -extravagance. The Etruskans, though filling their imaginations with -horrors, could never master art in life. They had the savage fondness -for adorning their persons with innumerable trinkets. The desire to -shine conspicuously for the short and uncertain time of their existence -absorbed their artistic endeavours, and this fashion prevails amongst -the peasants in Italy at the present day. The patterns are now filigree -Moresque; in ancient times they were in a clumsy Greek style. To wear a -ring was considered essential to man's and woman's existence. - -This led them very early to cultivate glyptics, or the art of -stone-cutting. The subjects were partly mythological, partly heroic; -the artists delighted in strong muscles, attitudinizing groups, and -theatrical postures. - -In the paintings and mosaics, with which they adorned their burial -chambers, we may distinguish, in reference to their treatment: - -a. An Archaic style; - -b. An Etruskan style. - -A. In the _Archaic Style_ they exhibit a thorough acquaintance with -Greek mythology and classical poetry. Orpheus, Homer, Hesiod and Pindar -furnish the scenes, but the dead play the most conspicuous part. -We have, in another world, festivities in vine bowers and blooming -gardens; processions, gymnastic games and races amongst the departed. -The grouping is spirited so far as variety is concerned, but the -execution is rough, and bare of all higher artistic feeling. - -B. In the _Etruskan Style_, stern simplicity and roughness yield to -a freer treatment of the human form. The thick-set, short figures -are replaced by better drawn and lighter forms; the subjects are -exclusively taken from Etruskan mythology. White and black spirits -(angels and devils), armed with big hammers, are represented as -fighting for the souls of the departed. In one of the graves (see -Dempster and Agincourt) we have a soul hanged, and tormented with iron -instruments, roasting over a brisk fire. In these products, in spite -of the intervention of the Roman period of history, we find the direct -connecting link between the old Assyrian, Egyptian, Etruskan, and early -Christian arts. - -The Etruskans indulged in fantastic conceptions, and rejoiced in forced -and cruel scenes, and in bizarre compositions. Art with them was -exclusively technical. We may arrange their works into the following -five groups:-- - -1. The original _Tuscanica_ (as Strabo has it) or Etruskan works. Heavy -in form and details; dresses very stiff; figures without beards. Of -this group we have many bronze figures, very few sculptures in stone, -some gems, and some very old wall-paintings. - -2. The Oriental group. Imitations of Egyptian, Assyrian, and Babylonian -patterns. Tapestry, for floor and wall-decorations, was much used. The -imitations were good, but without any effort at originality. Remains -plentiful. - -3. Caricatures distinguished by grotesque quaintness. This style -predominates at periods, when nations look upon art as superfluous; -not as one of the most important factors of civilization. Taste -degenerates, and the higher aspirations of art are crippled by -distorted products. The quaint is preferred to the beautiful, and the -dynamic force of the artistic element, driven into this direction, -loses itself in a broad grin at everything sacred and elevated in -State, religion, and science, fostering a deplorable spirit of vulgar -egotism, which looks down upon the sublime exertions of artists, as the -mere vagaries of simpletons or madmen. - -4. Works in the best Greek style, but only in bronze, as frames and -handles of mirrors. Whenever the higher spirit of art is neglected, -the power of the artist is directed to small matters; he serves trade -and nothing but trade. We have in these 'Articles of Etruria' the -prototypes of our 'Articles de Paris.' - -5. Mechanical products, such as helmets, weapons, swords, shields, -hatchets, clubs, wall-breakers, cooking utensils, pots, pans, and -saucers, were of exquisite workmanship, but without any attempt at -artistic forms. The utilitarian incubus is as bad as the hierarchical -canon; both expel all higher aspirations from the realm of art. - -The Etruskans thought, with many of us, that if the house were only -built of dry bricks, the carpet thick, the furniture solid and heavy, -and the knife sharp, it was unnecessary to care for anything else. -Whilst such ideas exist, art, in a higher sense, will remain as little -possible, as it was with the Etruskans. - - - - -CHAPTER X. - -ROMAN ART. - - -The Greeks, from a poetical, artistic, and esthetical, and the Romans, -from a social, legal, and political point of view, are still our -masters. Historical art-critics, and a certain class of writers, who -would wish to see the whole universe one great court of justice with -an infinite variety of crimes, subdivided into felony, misdemeanour, -petty larceny, &c., will never agree as to the place that should be -assigned to the Romans in the world's history. We are bold enough to -assert that the whole of the criminal and sanguinary history of Rome, -with her products in literature and art, might be wiped out, and yet -philosophically, poetically, and artistically, not the slightest gap in -the progressive development of humanity would be found. Socially and -legally, we should be sorry to miss a state, which had a mission of its -own, which, if well understood, may teach us the causes why the gentler -feelings of morality were oppressed, imagination defiled, and every -higher artistic aspiration deadened in Rome. - -From beginning to end, ROMA, read backwards AMOR, was an ambiguous -'state-abstraction,' which absorbed the individual. The State with the -Greeks was a concrete association of freemen. With the Romans, it was -the abstract principle of an imaginary union of heterogeneous citizens. -The Greeks fostered science and art, poetry and philosophy. The Romans -despised science, mocked art, scorned poetry, and never condescended -to trouble themselves about philosophy. The Greeks colonised and -civilised their colonies, which became the free daughters of a free -mother-country, attached to it by the ties of a common worship of -beauty and intellectual enjoyment. The Romans conquered, and the -conquered provinces were to furnish soldiers or labourers, and were -tied by means of despotism to the wheels of the proud state-carriage. -The Greeks humanised; the Romans demoralised and organised. The Greeks -played at soldiers in a spirit of glorious patriotism. The Romans were -soldiers for the sake of conquest, plunder, and vain glory. Spirited -youthfulness was the Greek element. Stern and calculating manliness -the essence of the Roman. The Greek was free in life, in art, in the -worship of his gods, in poetry and philosophy. The Roman was cowed -down in religion, politics and life, by the inexorable despotic -force of legal phantoms, which turned men into mere machines. The -despotism of the East was the despotism of some invisible god, or -some visible ruler; and it often overlooked the individual in its -almighty position. The democracy of Greece gave fair play to individual -talent and genius in art and science; but the Roman self-constituted -aristocracy, or rather triple theocracy, invented the inexorable and -meddlesome monster authority, to which everything was to be sacrificed. -Under the tragi-comical sobriquet, _Salus reipublicæ suprema lex_ (in -free translation, 'whatever we in authority find good, is good'), they -committed the blackest crimes, which no historian could venture to -commit to paper in their whole truthfulness. - -This triple theocracy presented itself in the shape of seven mythical -kings; in the form of a nominal republic, which was in reality a -military and theocratic aristocracy; and lastly in the theocracy of the -Cæsars, which in course of time was changed into a papal theocracy. - -The Romans had to reverence and submit to theocracy under the form of a -triple authority--the political authority; the paternal authority; and -the legal authority. Wherever the Roman turned to, in that vast empire, -which was bounded in the west by the Atlantic, in the north by the -Rhine and the Danube, in the east by the Euphrates, and in the south by -the deserts of Arabia and Africa, he met his triple crown of authority. -He was confronted by some consul or proconsul, some law, some edict, -some whim or caprice of an invisible something, that always had a -visible _lictor_ at its command with a bundle of sticks, ready for -flogging, or, in urgent cases, with a well-sharpened axe to sever the -head from the trunk. He had to obey a power, with innumerable soldiers, -ready to punish whole provinces if they resisted that ever present, -ever vigilant, and ever-active State abstraction. Whilst in Greece, -the individual man was developed with all his bodily and intellectual -faculties in science and art, Rome disturbed and hindered this -individual development, concentrating the static and dynamic forces of -her citizens on brutal military enterprises. - -Rome, through its theocratical spirit, oppressed the conquered by -the conqueror, the poor by the rich, the 'nihil habentes' by the -'possedentes,' the client by the patron, the plebeian by the patrician, -humanity by priests and gods, and the individual by the State. The -Roman as individual was never a self-acting, self-conscious, and -free-thinking entity, but a mere cipher after the State unit; a wheel -in a large and complicated machine; a drop of water in an ocean; -an atom in the universe. The Greek recognised in the State only an -agglomeration of men like himself; this sum total of citizens had -to serve _him_; the State was to him a means, not an aim. The Greek -demanded of the State that it should protect him in the free and -perfect use of his bodily and intellectual faculties. He was, if he -liked, poet, magistrate, athlete, judge, dancer, philosopher, fighter, -priest, wrestler, tragedian, soldier, or singer; all for his own sake, -without ever becoming an over-regulated or over-regulating pedant. -He worshipped his gods without restraining dogmas; he never allowed -his individuality to be absorbed by some incomprehensible, shapeless, -universal theocracy; his whole scientific and artistic national career -was one glorious struggle against such an accomplishment. All this was -the very reverse with the Romans. That Rome had no art or science of -her own, was the effect of those causes which we have here tried to -sketch in a general way. - -The Romans, like the Greeks, were a mixture of Aryans and Turanians, -with this difference, that with the Greeks the Aryan element -predominated, whilst with the Romans the Turanian, and even the black -elements formed a considerable portion of the national State body. The -Greek element, which, at the time of the earliest formation of the -Roman State, was very powerful, soon became absorbed in the Gallic, -Iberian, African, Egyptian, and Syrian elements. The enervating south -was not counterbalanced by the energetic north, but, on the contrary, -the south predominated; and as in the south-east theocratic despotism -flourished, the same principle was adopted by the Romans, and worked -into a perfect system. - -That the language of the Romans had a common origin with that of -the Greeks, Persians, and Indians is evident from the consideration -even of a few words. The verbs _sum_ (I am), _do_ (I give), and the -words _pater_, _mater_, _frater_, are Sanskrit. The most important -pastoral and agricultural expressions are Sanskrit, showing that a -certain degree of civilisation must have been brought with them by the -settlers, after their separation from their Trans-Himâlâyan brethren, -when they peopled the shores of the Mediterranean, and occupied that -small coast-land which was probably once connected with the African -continent through Sicily. - -_Pecus_, _sus_, _taurus_, and _canis_ are Sanskrit words. The Sanskrit -_agras_ (meadow) is the Latin _ager_ (Germ. _acker_, acre). The -Sanskrit _kurnu_ (Germ. _korn_, corn, grain) is the Latin _granum_. The -settlers were undoubtedly acquainted with even higher elements of a -steady and civilised life. The Sanskrit word _aritram_ (ship and oar), -survived as _aratrum_ the plough, cutting through the ground like the -aritram through the waves. The Sanskrit _damas_, {domos} is the Latin -_domus_; _naus_ is _navis_; _akshas_ is axis (Germ. _achse_) a coach -or cart; and we have in the Sanskrit _vastra_, the Latin _vestis_ -(vestment), not only a proof of the connection between the Aryans -of the Ganges, and those on the shores of the Tiber, but a living -testimony that the former had left off tattooing their bodies and used -textile fabrics. The Romans were first called Ramnes. Three races may -be said to have furnished the first settlers on the Seven Hills, the -Ramnes, Titians, and Lukeres. From this threefold confederation we have -the word tribuere, tribus (tribe). Later Pelasgians, Sabines, Albans, -Etruskans, and Hellenes joined the first settlers, and formed by -degrees the Roman State. - -As the Britons at one time earnestly believed that they were the -direct descendants of Brutus, the son of Æneas, we need not wonder that -the Romans should have indulged in the flattering faith that they were -the direct descendants of Æneas himself. They had scarcely attained a -settled state, when they began to work out their legends and myths, -concerning the divine foundation of their town, which had taken place -under _seven_ kings. - -1. Romulus, a god-man, for he and his brother, Remus, were incarnations -of the war-god Mars and miraculously born of a virgin. Their uncle -Amulius, fearing that they might deprive him of his throne, had them -exposed in the swollen Tiber in a cradle. The river subsided, and the -cradle was caught by a sacred fig-tree at the foot of the Palatine -hill, and a she-wolf had pity on the boys, and suckled them. The -founders of Rome thus mythically imbibed, with their foster-mother's -milk, that savage brutality and thirst for blood which distinguished -the citizens of the Holy City for thousands of years. Romulus and Remus -were found by shepherds, and brought up by them. Subsequently a town -was founded by the twins, and Romulus then killed his brother and ruled -alone. He divided the people into curiæ. - -2. Numa Pompilius enlarged the town and introduced a settled form of -worship, not out of piety, but in order to subject the citizens to the -will of the State. - -3. Tullus Hostilius improved upon the theocratical institutions of -Numa, and gave Rome a military organisation, as the secret tool with -which her will was to be enforced throughout a vast part of the globe. - -4. Ancus Martius commanded the citizens to have taste and to beautify -the town, or rather had this done, superintending the improvements -himself. He is stated to have been a grandson of Numa. - -5. Tarquinius Priscus, of a Korinthian family, showed in his very -infancy that he was destined by supernatural influences to become a -benefactor of the chosen people, the Romans. When a tender boy sleeping -in his cradle, his head was surrounded by a brilliant halo of flames. -He conquered many Latin and Sabine towns, and showed himself worthy -of his exalted position. He introduced the golden diadem, the ivory -throne, the sceptre adorned with an eagle, and the purple toga, as -distinctive marks of the supreme authority. - -6. Servius Tullius was also of supernatural origin. He was the son of -a female slave, and the protecting divinity of the royal castle. He -divided the people into five classes or castes; instituted tribunes, -and founded the orders of senators, knights, and commons. - -7. Tarquinius Superbus, like the Chinese tyrant Ly-wang, who succeeded -the five good emperors, defiled the imperial dignity, outraged all -laws, divine and human, and was rebelled against by the patricians, -who abolished the regal authority. The innocent Lucretia is said to -have been the direct cause of the expulsion of the tyrant, and the -establishment of the republic. - -In the myths concerning these seven kings we have abundant elements for -the most beautiful songs, epic poems, and artistic subjects full of -dramatic power and vitality. The remarkable fact with the Romans was, -that they preserved these myths as _historical_ truths, recorded them -in dull _prose_, affixing to them dates, each of which was a flagrant -falsehood, and used them in good earnest as the basis of their national -existence. - -The royal period ended with the seven kings. Rome had prepared in -perfect silence her murderous weapons, and, suddenly dashing forward -a well-trained prize-fighter, inaugurated the military theocracy. The -history of this second period, with its appalling monotony, may be -condensed into one terrible word--WAR. - -From 342-340 B.C. war with the Samnites. From 340-337 B.C. war with -the Latins. From 325-290 B.C. the second and third Latin war. From -288-264 B.C. war with Carthage and Syrakuse. From 264-241 B.C. the -first Punic war. Peace was made, and to fill up the leisure hours, -there was a Gallic war. From 218-201 B.C. the second Punic war. -Peace was again concluded, and during the interval (183 B.C.) Greece -and the Makedonian empire were subjugated. From 149-146 B.C. the -third Punic war. The world was conquered, and the boundaries of the -vast empire extended in all directions; but the warlike spirit of -the Romans had not learnt to rest and to enjoy these conquests in -peace; industry, arts, and sciences, had no charm for these wild and -indomitable conquerors, and wanting a foreign enemy, they quarrelled -amongst themselves. The internal dissensions began. There were the -Numantian troubles, the tumults of the Gracchi, and the feud between -Marius and Sulla. A foreign war happily put an end to these internal -struggles. From 112-106 B.C. war with Jugurtha. From 88-80 B.C. war -with Mithridates. From 72-71 B.C. the slaves rebelled and called for -bread and for revenge. This was the first civil war--individual egotism -conspired against the supreme power, faction fought against faction; -a dissolution of all law and order threatened the State. From 54-51 -B.C. the Gallic war amused the Roman spectators and war-comedians. From -49-48 B.C. there was a second civil war; from 43-30 B.C. a third; and -the republic was at last absorbed by a Cæsarian theocracy. - -That arts and sciences did not flourish in a state of continual warfare -is quite natural. The houses were mean and low, here and there adorned -with clumsy Etruskan pillars; the temples had some Greek forms; -sculpture was not cultivated, and Greeks had to chisel or to carve -the scanty embellishments. On the other hand, high roads of great -excellence, and bold bridges with magnificent arches, were constructed, -for everywhere the spirit of practical realism was served; in every -stone, every column, every pillar, every statue, the spirit of -theocratic despotism predominated. The charming gods of the Greeks were -turned into haughty military commanders, not inviting love through -beauty, but demanding blind obedience with a thundering '_sic volo, sic -jubeo_' ('as I will it, so I command it'). - -The period of imperial theocracy showed Rome in her pomp and splendour, -covering inner hollowness and gradual decay with marble slabs. Palaces -and temples, basilicæ and arcades, triumphal arches and amphitheatres, -arenas and baths (of the latter Rome alone had about 768), naumachiæ -and circuses, theatres and arenas, hippodromes and magnificent tombs -abounded; but in all these architectural marvels, the monumental spirit -of pride, self-glorification, vain ostentation, and theatrical display, -is to be traced; the love of beauty, of artistic moderation, and -simplicity being everywhere conspicuous by its absence. Roman art and -decoration are to be carefully studied, that we may learn 'how not to -do it,' if we earnestly intend to produce works of art, and not works -of ornamentation, forming a very Paradise for 'parvenus' with bad taste. - -We have asserted that the Romans never produced anything original in -art and science. Their religion, their literature, and their products -of art, bear this assertion out to the very letter. - -The word 'religion' is of Roman origin. The Teutons have _faith_ -or trust in God. The Roman word meant the tying down of everyone -to certain formulas or dogmas. They borrowed their dogmas and -superstitions, their gods and ceremonies, from all parts of the world; -especially from the Greeks and Etruskans, and later from the Egyptians. -Everything served their purpose so soon as it helped to overawe the -masses. They had augurs, auspices, and sibylline oracles. From the -entrails of beasts and human beings they predicted the future. Flashes -of lightning, the rolling thunder, the flight of birds, meetings with -hares, goats, dogs, or cats, announced the will of the gods. The -conceptions of the Eastern gods were disfigured, and they were made -more jealous, threatening, merciless, revengeful, and inexorable. -Jupiter the thunderer (Jupiter tonans) did not govern by any moral law, -but by mere force; he spoke in flashes of lightning and in thunder, -in terrifying earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Amongst the 30,000 -deities with which the Roman triple theocracy peopled the visible and -invisible world, there was not ONE divinity of kindness, mercy, and -comfort. - -They had a divinity of peace, to urge them on to war; they had -divinities of plague, hunger, fever, mildew, and death. In their -practical spirit they went even so far as to have a 'Dea Cloacina.' - -What subjects to paint or sculpture! - -A pale-yellow woman with dishevelled hair, protruding ghastly eyes, -wasted lips, fleshless and emaciated limbs, may represent the goddess -of hunger; another woman deliberately and slowly tearing the limbs of -helpless creatures from their bodies with diabolical delight, may be -a goddess of plague; another, placidly playing with human skulls in a -field surrounded by dying men, women, and children, may be the goddess -of death. - -In the illustration of a Dante or a Milton, a knowledge of the Roman -mythology may prove full of suggestive power. - -The Greeks had a principle in their anthropomorphic worship; the Romans -had no aim. Roman high-priests were spiritual butchers, who tried to -appease the angry gods with the smoke of burning bullocks, to nourish -them with fat, with which they literally besmeared the statues, and -to quench their thirst with blood which they poured over the altars. -When already educated enough to consider all these divinities with a -cold and sceptic indifference; when the augurs could no longer meet -without laughing and sneering at each other and their sacred office, -then the Roman mind became eager for a more concrete god than these -stone figures, and they found a corresponding living divinity in the -person of their Emperors. Earth certainly could offer nothing more -divine in the form of visible majesty, recognised and obeyed, as -soon as clothed in the imperial purple and crowned with the imperial -diadem, than the irresponsible 'god-man,' who sat on the throne of -the Cæsars. The creative force of the Universe, and the phenomena of -nature, were moulded in visible forms; and now for the first time a -political abstraction had become incarnate in the Emperor _pro tem_. -The hordes of courtiers, courtezans, flatterers, poets, philosophers, -historians, juris consults, orators, prætors, and consuls, supported -by the thoughtless mass of the people, rendered _divine_ honours to -a _mortal_, in whom, however, the _immortal_ principle of theocratic -authority was concentrated. Not even the Egyptians, crouching in -grateful admiration before the crocodiles of the Nile, outraged -humanity to such a degree as these polite Romans, rendering divine -honour to an Emperor, like Aurelius Commodus, who fought 735 times as -a common gladiator in the arena before his enervated people. The Roman -religion was, in fact, a cosmopolitan mixture of all the atrocious -superstitions of the world. - -The Romans also instituted public games in imitation of the Greeks, -on the degrading 'panis et circenses' principle. In Greece, Apollo -with his nine muses presided over the public games. The Romans had -specially-trained gladiators, wrestlers, dancers, and prize-fighters. -The competitors at the Greek games were free and independent citizens; -with the Romans they were either criminals, runaway slaves, or men -condemned to death. Bears, lions, tigers, and elephants were starved, -and set against one another, to delight the spectators with their -savage brutality. Soon an improvement was effected, and men were -arrayed against men with deadly weapons, to amuse men and women, boys -and girls, with their skill in murdering; and at last, as a further -progressive development in taste, men were pitted against wild beasts. -In the Greek tragedy, the ideal sufferings of humanity, struggling in -an unequal combat with omnipotent and inexorable fate, were prominently -set forth to purify men from their passions by showing the consequences -of even unconscious guilt. The Greek tragedy was the national moral -conscience brought into the most perfect poetical form. The Romans -instituted a cruel reality of _bodily_ suffering; _real_ blood -streaming from _real_ limbs; the _real_ rattle in the throat, which -signals death; and the _real_ last gasp of an expiring man, afforded -them amusement. - -Like their religion and public games, their literature, with -the exception of their satires and law-codes, was matter of -fact and imitative. The generation of the Roman products of -poetry and prose was the following: Homer engendered Virgil, -Hesiod--Lucretius; Pindar--Horace; Æsop--Phædrus; Euripides--Terence; -Aristophanes--Plautus; Xenophon--Sallust; Thukydides--Titus Livy; -Demosthenes--Cicero. Ovid and Tacitus were the only really original -writers; the first faithfully depicted the hollowness of Roman ethics; -and the other, in unsurpassed language, drew a historical sketch of the -Teutons, mercilessly exposing the contrast between noble simplicity, -grandeur and honesty, and the demoralised state of his own country. - -If art is the outgrowth of the intellectual and moral condition of a -people, what kind of art could the Romans have produced? None. And -this was the case. Roman art is altogether a misnomer; it is in fact -Etruskan, Greek, Assyrian, and Egyptian art, dressed in an eclectic -Roman garb by foreign artists. Art with the Romans was never the -glorious emanation of the poet's sacred ideal of the gods, or the -irresistible civilising power of beauty; it was merely the handmaid -of power, wealth, pomp, and vanity. Art was with them a slave, well -fed, well clad, well housed, well paid, to make power more powerful, -to dazzle the people, to proclaim the universal dominion of Rome over -the world. The Roman character was dry and geometrical, and therefore -in its artistic taste architectural and monumental. Anything that -could serve, by means of technical perfection, to promote art, was -encouraged, adopted, and supported by the Romans. - -We have given a drastic picture of the evils of the Roman spirit; we -must be just to the great mission which it fulfilled unconsciously -and against its will. The centralisation in language, customs, and -manners produced a cosmopolitan spirit. Greek artists and philosophers -spread taste and learning. Distant nations were brought into closer -connection. The roads constructed to facilitate the march of legions, -bent on devastating a province, served as means of communication; so -did their aqueducts and bridges. The wants of an increasing population -forced the Romans to improve agriculture, and commerce was found -necessary. Corn had to be brought from one quarter, textile fabrics -from another; Greece and Egypt were pillaged of their innumerable works -of art, and Rome may be said to have been at that period the greatest -museum of the universe. The superstition and credulity which existed -among the people, by degrees disappeared. Africa had been considered a -land of monsters, with serpents large enough to entangle a whole army -and to crush it; other regions of the accessible world had been thought -inhabited by men without heads. Giants, kyklops, and enchantresses had -been said to perform incredible feats, but were found to be without -supernatural power; the golden apples of Spain turned out to be mere -oranges, and graced the tables of the wealthier, and in time even of -the poorer classes. The mouth of hell had been placed on the shores -of the Euxine (Black Sea), but when those regions were occupied by -Roman soldiers, the mouth of hell had to be removed elsewhere. East -and west, south and north, were united under one great Roman vault, -the four quarters of the globe were over-arched, and the broad cupola -of universalism set over them. Man was made a common slave to one -grand and common abstraction, typically foreshadowing the time when -men would be brought as free agents under one great dome of universal -brotherhood. - -For this grand and really majestic soldering of humanity into one -total, the Romans found the spiritual as well as the material form in - - 1. The arch. - 2. The cross-vault. - 3. The cupola. - -Through the _arch_, which was used by the Etruskans, but which under -the Romans became a most important part of architecture, the art of -constructing was suddenly freed of all hindrances. Courts could be -formed with more ease, and the ground-plan drawn with greater variety. - -The _cross-vault_ may be considered a specially Roman form. Two -cylindrical arches were constructed intersecting each other at right -angles in a quadrangular space. The intersection takes place at the two -diagonal lines, thus uniting the opposite corners. The arches in their -cross-form rise from four points of support, and divide the arch into -four curved triangles, called calottes. - -The _cupola_, a third form of the vault, was called forth in the Romans -by their preference for _circular_ buildings. The ancient mound was -revived by them. It was the application of the arch to a circular -ground-plan. A powerful larger or smaller member of decoration was -produced, interrupting the flatness of walls, and allowing a rich -variety of statuary to be used as ornament. This refers to the use of -the half-cupola for semicircular niches and the apsidæ. These merely -geometrical constructions would have been monotonous and without grace, -like our railway stations; and would have been classed as works of -engineering, but never of art; had not the Romans employed Greek forms -in the shape of columns and pilasters, to adorn them. The Doric, Ionic, -Attic, and Korinthian styles were all used, and a so-called composite -or Roman order was added. The composite stood in the same relation to -the proto-Korinthian, as Plautus to Aristophanes. The Romans, with -arrogant clumsiness, placed a coarser and more contracted form of the -Ionic capital on two rows of richly carved acanthus leaves. This was a -bad composition, and left room for much improvement, which was effected -more than fifteen hundred years later. - -Nothing is known of art during the mythical period of Roman history. - -During the first centuries of the Republic, the Etruskan style is said -to have been prevalent, introduced by Tarquin. Square wooden huts with -a rounded and tumulus-like roof of straw, were the first palaces of the -Roman citizens. Only after the conquest of Greece 183 B.C., Grecian -architecture and sculpture were introduced. From this date we may -classify Roman art, under Greek, Assyrian, and Egyptian influences, -into the following periods. - -_a._ The _first_ begins in the second century B.C., under the Republic, -after the destruction of Korinthum by Mummius, and ends with the reign -of the Augustan house, and the beginning of the rule of the Flavians, -69 A.D. This was the _Græco-Roman Period_ of architecture and sculpture. - -_b._ The _second_ period commences with the _Flavians_, 69 A.D. After -the tyrannical reigns of Tiberius and Nero, the cosmopolitan Imperial -state acquired an apparent stability in new social forms, which found -expression in gigantic artistic constructions. This period, which -lasted down to Septimus Severus, 193 A.D., has three distinct phases. - -a. A phase of powerful development under the Flavians. - -b. A phase of brilliant success under _Trajan_ (98-117 A.D.) - -c. A phase of revival of classic Greek forms under _Hadrian_ -(117-138 A.D.) - -We may designate these phases of development as the _Romano-Greek_ -period. - -_c._ The _third_ period under the military despotism of the prætorian -guards, during which Rome ceased to be the centre of universal -dominion, and each province began to feel its own vitality, lasted -from _Septimus Severus_ (193-211 A.D.) to Constantine the Great. -Art lost every basis--degenerated into luxurious pomp, and became -heavier with each new product, and more fantastic in incredible -details and impossible executions. We may best designate this as the -_Romano-eclectic_ period. - -A. After the destruction of Korinthum, Rome abounded in Greek -immigrants, and in Greek marble and bronze statues, friezes, pillars, -and various movable works of art. The spoils of Greek temples and -houses were set up in Roman houses built of bricks and mortar. The -contrast between the unartistic architecture of the Romans, and the -master-pieces of Greek art, was so striking, that they were forced -to endeavour to improve their architecture, and art became to a -certain degree _fashionable_. The wealthier classes began to study -it _theoretically_, and to affect an immense amount of _patronizing_ -enthusiasm, without any deeper understanding of the laws of taste and -beauty, but with a determination to outdo all other nations in the -profession of works of art. Such sentiments often engender a _brisk -trade_, but they fail to promote real art, or to benefit genuine -artists. The walls of the houses of this period were generally white, -with red painted ornamentations. Red is the favourite colour with -children, savages, and butchers in mind. This led to the making of -red bricks, which were mixed with others of different colours, and -thus originated polylithic wall-decoration. The spaces between the -red bricks were filled in with a black composition in imitation of -different textile patterns, and this mode of decoration was called -Niello. By degrees, bricks and cement were superseded by marble, and -the houses became so rich, that a Puritan party of Roman {idiôtais} -formed itself, and thundered against corruption and enervation, luxury -and degradation. The power of this party was so great that Cicero, -fearing lest these stern and dull Roman worthies should think him -acquainted with the principles of artistic refinement, declared his -utter ignorance of art, and expressed his high contempt for all such -futile 'allotria.' - -The art of ornamentation became more and more universal. The fora and -atria were overcrowded with bronze and marble statues and groups. -These efforts, however, were not genuine; they did not grow out of the -artistic wants and love of the people--the whole movement was strange -to their minds--and was altogether a heterogeneous element grafted on -their natures by the force of circumstances. They succeeded by degrees -in ornamenting grandly, but there was always something in contradiction -to, or in conflict with, really good taste. They used patterns meant -for floors on their walls, and wall patterns on their ceilings, and -that which would have fitted a ceiling, they laid on their floors; -creating by this means a sad confusion. Asia always excelling in bright -colours, and in a secret talent for matching them correctly, excited -the admiration of the Romans, and they began to paint their walls. They -often cut out the decorated parts of a pillaged Greek temple, and fixed -these pieces at random in their houses, caring very little whether -there was a congruity between these and their own wall-decoration -or not. We have, during this period, an attempt at 'scenography.' -The walls were painted over with architectural views, representing -colonnades, interiors, landscapes, and later, Greek mythological and -even historical scenes. In these, Perseus and Andromeda, or Medea -meditating the murder of her children, or Herkules destroying the -serpent, or some other _sensational_ deed, formed the cherished -subjects. Under the influence of the Greeks of Alexandria, another -custom became prevalent. The walls were more and more panelled, and the -panels filled with works of art. - -This 'mania,' or fashion, became so universal with the Romans that -they could find no more works of classic art, and had to engage living -artists to reproduce antique cornices, metopes, colonnades, capitals, -shields, helmets, tripods, sphinxes, and griffins; but even these -artists were so overwhelmed with commissions, that it was impossible -for them to satisfy the feverish demand. To produce works of art more -quickly, they began to paint the panels, and the Roman empire became a -complete manufactory of wall-decorations. Light colonnades of slender -reeds, baldachins with pointed arches and fantastic monsters, filled -the walls, and sometimes mere combinations of colours were used in a -conventional style. Art again sank into mere trade. The panels and -walls were not decorated with the works of the good old Greek masters, -but with mere imitations. Mannerism supplanted style, and arabesques, -flourishes, insignificant chequered patterns, or geometrical puzzles, -took the place of historical paintings--poor wall-decorations in a -theatrical style, without any attempt at higher art. - -The use of marble as a means of decoration was not always customary -with the Romans, and was introduced by L. Crassus, the censor, who had -his house decorated with six small columns of marble from Hymettus, -and was very much blamed for this extravagance. M. Scaurus, the ædile, -who built the famous wooden theatre, decorated with 360 pillars of -marble, glass, and bronze, and about 3,000 statues and images, had the -atrium and peristyle of his private house richly adorned with exquisite -columns. Manurra, prefect of the armourers, under Julius Cæsar in -Gaul, is set down as the first who had his walls decorated with marble -incrustations; whilst M. Catulus could boast of the first marble -flooring, and of thresholds in Numidian marble. Of temples, one of the -first constructed of marble blocks in a purer Greek style was that of -Jupiter Tonans. The temple of _Fortuna Virilis_ which rose on a lofty -substructure on the banks of the Tiber, was in the Ionic style. The -Vesta temple at Tivoli, enthroned on a steep and rocky height above the -foaming waters of the Anio, was a circular building in the Korinthian -style. - -Theatres, public halls, baths, and Fora were found necessary, either -to distract the public mind from political matters, or to gain the -suffrages of the fickle mob, eager for amusement and excitement. The -first theatre in stone was erected by Pompey. Julius Cæsar surpassed -all his predecessors and rivals in magnificence. He began the theatre -of Marcellus, which was completed by Augustus, and so enlarged and -beautified the _Circus Maximus_ that it could accommodate 150,000 -spectators; he built the beautiful Basilica Julia, a public law-court -for the Centumviri or Judges to sit in, and hear causes, and for the -counsellors to receive their clients, and had a new Forum constructed, -and adorned it with a temple dedicated to Venus Genetrix. The Roman -Forum (in imitation of the Greek Agora) was a building about three -times as long as broad. The interior was surrounded by arched porticos, -and flanked by the most stately edifices, such as theatres, basilicæ, -and temples. - -These Fora were devoted to special purposes, as Fora _civilia_ or Fora -_venalia_, and were used for public meetings, or as market-places. -Cæsar tried to become a Roman Perikles, but was distanced in this by -the Emperor Augustus. Up to the establishment of Cæsarism, Rome had -been literally a city of 'bricks;' now it became a 'city of marble.' -Temples were profusely built and rebuilt. The Cæsarian theocracy -required these abodes of splendour and self-glorification. One of the -most imposing specimens of this _Græco-Roman_ architecture was the -Pantheon, built by Agrippa, the son-in-law of Augustus. Originally -it was to have been an entrance-hall to splendid Thermæ, but on its -completion it was turned into a temple, and dedicated to the avenging -Jupiter. It was a circular building 132 feet in diameter, and 132 -feet high, and triumphantly proclaimed Rome's wealth and might. It -contained a statue of Minerva by Pheidias, and a Venus, who it is said -had in her ear the half of the pearl left by Cleopatra. The pearl was -valued at 125,000_l._ That a Greek marble statue should have been -ornamented with part of the _ear-ring_ of an Egyptian princess, is -highly characteristic of Roman taste in matters of art. One of the most -splendid remains in the style of good Greek Korinthian ornamentation -is the temple of Augustus at Pola in Istria. Triumphal gates, these -Roman specialities, were at this period simple in design, and perfect -in execution. Of the Mausoleum of Augustus nothing is left but the -substructure, 220 feet in diameter, now used as a circus for equestrian -performances. 'Sic transit gloria mundi,' if based on mere ostentation -and vain pride. - -During this period Nikopolis was planned and built; the Temple of -Solomon was adorned with colonnades in the Greek Korinthian style, -and at Nîmes (Nemausus) we possess the most complete remains of a -prostylos pseudipteros temple of Roman architecture, with the purest -Korinthian columns. Under Tiberius the camp of the prætorians was -turned into a marble palace. Under Claudius harbours and moles were -enlarged, built, and decorated. Nero burned Rome, to reconstruct -it with greater pomp. The architects Celerus and Severus had to -build the _golden houses_, of which the porticos were miles long. -The dining-rooms surpassed in splendour anything dreamt of in Indian -poetry. In the decoration of this palace, or rather cluster of palaces, -we trace the greatest mistake an artist can be guilty of. The error -is of Asiatic origin. It may be designated as a conscious '_lying_' -in the constructive elements. They tried to hide the costly material -under a cheap disguise; a tendency as bad and objectionable, as a -'lying' in cheap substances to represent costly materials. The Romans -used tortoise-shell as veneer for their furniture, and painted it to -make it appear like wood; we, on the other hand, use wood, and paint it -over to make it appear 'giallo antico,' (yellow marble), or any other -costly stone. Ornamentation began to lose all symmetry and proportion. -Confusion and profusion ruled supreme. The walls of the rooms looked -like exhibitions of oriental carpets, tapestry, and jewelry. Art -retrograded to the over-painted, over-decorated, over-ornamented -shrouds, in which the mummies of old were buried. For a time art was -carried with Asiatic splendour to a grave of tasteless pomposity. - -B. With the Flavians, down to Septimus Severus, a new spirit of -artistic universalism pervaded the Roman world. The Greek element -waned, and the circular forms of the Romans, ornamented with an -indiscriminate mixture of Doric, Ionic, and Korinthian columns, -predominated. The Colosseum, a Flavian amphitheatre, begun by Vespasian -and finished by Titus, belongs to this period. Three rows of arcades, -the first of Doric, the second of Ionic, and the third of Korinthian -half-columns, with their entablatures, crowned with a fourth story, -adorned with Korinthian pilasters, and furnished with windows, -encompassed an oval, 600 feet long by 500 feet broad, capable of -holding 80,000 spectators. The circus was so constructed that it could -also be used as a naumachy. In this over-decorated pompous building, -the great fights of the gladiators took place; here men and wild beasts -met in deadly struggle; here men, if killed, were dragged away by ropes -fixed in their bodies with iron hooks; here the Imperators sat with all -the nobility of Rome, and delighted in sports, which, at a later period -of Rome's spiritual dominion, were only surpassed in _cruelty_ by the -pious 'auto-da-fés' of misguided priests. - -The triumphal arch of Titus, on the heights of the Via Sacra; with -one arch broken through the massive walls, ornamented on each side by -half-columns; was the first to be decorated with the coarser form of -the Roman _composite capital_. The ornamentation keeps within certain -limits; the inner side walls of the arch have excellent reliefs, -referring to the destruction of Jerusalem. - -Everything yet enumerated was surpassed in splendour and magnificence -by the 'Forum Trajanum' (A.D. 98-117), of which Apollodorus, born -at Damaskus, was the architect. The great basilica Ulpia, with its -_five aisles_, formed part of it. In a small courtyard, surrounded by -pillars, rose the gigantic column of Trajan to a height of 92 feet. -The reliefs, which in spiral windings surround the richly ornamented -column, are a kind of Imperial record, chronicling with historical -accuracy and dryness, scene after scene of the Dacian war. The -figures are two feet high and not less than 2,500 in number; they are -sculptured in a simple naturalistic style, void of all idealisation, -and show the artist's talent for grouping. The heads of the figures, as -was generally the case in all sculptures by the Romans, are too small -for the bodies. - -The triumphal arch of Constantine, with three openings, is undoubtedly -the most splendid monument of its kind. It was of Pentelic marble, -taken from the fragments of an arch in honour of Trajan. The -proportions are noble, and the execution is technically precise; -the ornamentation, however, is too profuse. The second phase of -this period degenerated very quickly. Cornices began to be fluted; -triglyphs and indentations were used alternately in endless rows; even -the central volutes of the Corinthian capitals (the caulicoli) were -over-decorated. Everything ran wild; rosettes, cassettes, shields, -consols, stereobates, and stylobates were used abundantly, without -sense and reason, to heighten the effect of the horizontal lines of -the buildings. Everything was out of shape, out of proportion, and out -of place. An eternal repetition of the same forms proclaimed the same -desperate _deification_ of the omnipotent power of the theocratic ruler. - -Hadrian, the emperor, whose position constituted him a _divine_ -architect, and who by his very dignity must have known art better than -any other mortal, did not share, with many a self-conceited artist of -our time, the idea that the 'work and labour done' was all that was -required in art, and that any knowledge of correct principles, any -feeling of beauty, any acquaintance with esthetics or with art-history, -was useless, and that money and power of execution were the only things -required. On the contrary, though Emperor of the Romans, he diligently -studied the antique, and tried to revive classic art. - -We had an _imperial architect_, with an unlimited amount of gold, -silver, marble, wood, and precious material at his command, and yet he -had to go back to the Greeks for elegant forms in ornamentation. He -had Apollodorus executed for daring to find fault with the confused -plan of the temple of Venus (_Amor_) _and Roma_, which was a building -surpassing, so far as splendour went, any construction of those times. -The double temple had certainly something whimsical in its plan. The -Emperor was too forcibly struck by the discovery that _Roma_ read -backwards gave _Amor_, and wanted to express this discovery in an -architectural allegory, placing _two_ temples back to back so that -they made _one_, to typify _two_ words with _two_ meanings, that yet -were _one_ word. The success, so far as correctness of plan went, was -doubtful. The cassettes of the bronze roof which united the _two_ -temples into _one_, were most elegantly finished. The court of the -temple was 500 feet by 300. Another tower-like circular monument, -based on a square sub-structure, formed the Mausoleum (now the Castle -of St. Angelo). The diameter of the circular part was 226 feet. The -construction vies in solidity and grandeur with the Egyptian monuments. -The blocks of travertin are colossal, and the immense building was -covered with Parian marble, and crowned with a huge quadriga. - -Under the Antonines architecture, and art in general, gradually -declined. The people occupied themselves with entirely different -topics. Stoicism and Christianity--the old world of heathen formality, -and the new world of spiritual redemption--were placed in conflict. -A disturbed state of the public mind rarely favours plastic art. -A specimen exhibiting this conflict may be seen in the temple of -Antoninus and Faustina, built by Antoninus Pius (A.D. 138-161). A -second edition of Trajan's column is given in that of Marcus Aurelius -(A.D. 161-180), which stands on the field of Mars. The reliefs, winding -round the shaft, represent scenes from the war against the Markomanni. -There is a certain liveliness in the execution, but the composition -is wanting in clearness and precision, and above all in idealisation. -Rivers, fields, and enclosures of walls, are marked with great -accuracy; and the reliefs take, in style, the forms of geographical -maps. Strict realism is the leading feature in this monument. - -C. During the third period architecture and sculpture, ornamentation -and painting, had soon to yield to a continual use of arms. The proud -mistress of the world no more expanded her sway; she was once more -busy in decorating her rich palaces, but in care and sorrow, and -with an anxious brow, haunted by the necessity for exerting all her -powers to keep what she possessed. The provinces had learnt to do -without Rome; the consuls and pro-consuls had so well imitated their -_divine_ masters, that they thought themselves gods, and the supreme -deity, the Imperator, lost his power over them. The State--based on -an abstraction--began to vanish like a midnight phantom at daybreak. -The one-sided deification of matter, during the old heathen times, had -to yield to a totally new mode of feeling, thinking, speaking, and -acting. The new times were seeking new forms, and had to pass from a -savage state, through that of barbarism, symbolism, and mysticism, -into self-consciousness, in order to find such shapes as would express -a perfect harmony between spirit and matter. In the meantime, art -dragged on its existence in copying what the old masters of Greece -and the artists of Rome had done. The chisel, ruler, nay the very -stones, trembled in the hands of the artists. They felt that they -worked without a basis; that they heaped up blocks to see them soon -crumble into the dust; that they constructed streets of pompous -columns, some of them 3,500 feet long, to see them empty and deserted; -they ornamented, but did it with a heavy heart; their soul was no -more in the work. They heard already the deep _spiritual_ whisper -of other tidings resounding through the world on one side, and the -terrible _temporal_ shout of powerful barbarians, not yet enervated by -luxury and licentiousness, armed with swords and iron clubs, on the -other. The footsteps of avenging phantoms were heard in the North; -the 'hallelujahs' of redeemed humanity in the South. This period is -ushered in with the triumphal arch of Severus, on which the reliefs are -placed without any regard to the architectural arrangement. Caracalla -(A.D. 211-217) had baths constructed, with gigantic halls, furnished -with 1,600 marble seats, with shady promenades, pompous reading-rooms, -and places for games of every variety. This was to be a paradise on -earth, to detach men from that _spiritual_ Eden of love and happiness, -the gates of which were opened by Christ. In feverish excitement, -streets, palaces, basilicæ, halls, market-places, monuments, and whole -towns, were built by the heathens. The pomp of worship was increased. -Diocletian constructed baths with 2,400 seats; the principal hall -was under three cross-vaults, with a span of 80 feet each, resting on -granite columns. Sensationalism seized upon both people and artists; -a sensationalism tinged with Roman vulgarity. All the principles of -architecture, sculpture, and ornamentation were neglected. Columns and -arches were mixed together in doleful incongruity. The arch rested -on the architrave, or often rose without interruption directly from -the capital. Columns were made in spiral or screw form; the variety -of details was oppressive; no rest, no cæsura distinguished their -ornamentation. It was, in fact, _an ornamentation over-ornamented_. The -technical execution was everywhere splendid, but utterly mechanical; -principles were neglected in art, because Roman life had lost even the -one guiding principle of its existence--expansion by brutal force. The -vulgar in mind and taste will always be charmed by huge and imposing -masses, by the richness of the material, the daring of geometrical -combination, and by startling feats of mechanical contrivance. The -gorgeous mouldings, the friezes of endless decorations, the capitals -with their rich foliage, marshalled in precise architectural lines, -like Roman legions placed in battle array, have a peculiarly mystic -charm for all those, who care more for effect than for taste or -severity of style, or more for show than for symmetry and proportion; -but if they love the old Roman style, and wish to work in it, let -them above all insist on genuine materials. Let them work in real -granite, travertin, and marble; let them not work in iron and glass, -or in plaster of Paris, instead of Carrara marble; or in wood painted -and varnished to represent granite, _lapis lazuli_ (azure-stone), or -_giallo antico_. An artist's first duty is to know and master his -material, and not to try and bring about Roman architectural effects -with substances that require an altogether different treatment. -Whenever we endeavour to shirk this law, we are sure to produce -something small and mean, thin and wasted, notwithstanding gorgeous -dimensions. Whilst trying to look grand and haughty, substantial and -pompous, we tell 'falsehoods' in bricks and mortar, in painted friezes, -sham columns, and meretricious porticos; and we are then astonished -that our artistic product, instead of being admired, is laughed at as a -caricature. - -In Greece the dynamic force was concentrated on the reproduction of -_ideal beauty_; in Rome it was exhausted in conquests and politics. -Only so long as the moral force of beauty--equivalent to that of -virtue--counterbalanced the eccentricities of a wild fantastic -imagination, the Greeks were capable of producing models of art. The -Romans never cultivated this balance; they disciplined themselves, -but in a totally different direction. This technical, mechanical, and -military discipline is, at a certain period of an individual's or a -nation's life, highly necessary, in order to place the bodily and -intellectual capacities under the guidance of some authority, although -this may be a mere abstraction. The results which may thus be attained, -can be studied in Roman art, in spite of all its shortcomings. - -CHRISTIANITY now illuminated the world with its clear light; but, -dazzled by the divine brilliancy, everything in art, science and social -life appeared at first dark, black, and hopeless. By degrees the minds -of men began to grasp the newly proclaimed eternal law, through which -alone the disturbed inner and outer, spiritual and material, moral and -intellectual, static and dynamic forces of humanity were to attain -a perfect balance. In time man became conscious of his nature, and -emancipated his spirit in life and in art. He began to strive upwards, -to detach himself from mere forms, however beautiful, if there was -no meaning, no soul, no sense in them; he sought in everything the -redeeming IDEA, without which no _modern_ work of art is possible. -Thus, ancient art had to yield to different principles. We shall have -in future to distinguish between artistic products of _reality_, -_feeling_, and _intellect_, till we shall find ourselves obliged to -seek for a combination of these elements in order to understand modern -art. - - - - -CHAPTER XI. - -EARLY CHRISTIAN ART. - - -Historically and philosophically, from the point of view of whatever -religious denomination; in the eyes of the devout believer, as well as -in the eyes of the sceptic; by the thinker, and by the mere automaton -of blood, flesh and bones; it must be admitted, that the two most -important events in the history of humanity were the foundation of -Christianity, and the great migration of the Northern people. The one -was a _spiritual_ movement, the other thoroughly _material_. - -It is usual, in tracing the historical development of mankind in -science and art, to follow the apparent course of the sun, and to -assume that progress travelled with Indra, Ormuzd, Horus and Phoibos -Apollo, from East to West. This is, however, a mere phrase. To -understand and appreciate the history of man, it is better to divide -the globe into a southern and northern hemisphere; for we find, that in -analogy with this subdivision, the material as well as the intellectual -development of life on our globe took place. We may even go further, -and trace a distinction between the development of life and art in -the south and north of the northern and southern hemispheres. In the -farthest south of the southern hemisphere we have animal life and -man, in the very lowest scale of progressive development; whilst the -further we travel towards the north, the more animal life and the -intellectual capacity of man increase. This is also the case in the -northern hemisphere, up to the frigid zone, where a reaction sets in. -In the south the moral power was more developed than the intellectual. -In the south the predominant static force, joined to an ill-disciplined -imagination, drove man to the field of metaphysical speculation; the -misunderstood laws of nature, and the ignorance of the sluggish and -indolent masses, gave free play to superstition and priestcraft. Thus -the south (or south-east) was the birth-place of various theogonies, -and religious systems. Idolatry, zoolatry, Sabaism, theism, pantheism, -astrology, symbolism, mysticism, alchemy, magic, and cabalism -originated in the south. The intellectual power in humanity, with a -strong tendency to regulate itself by moral force, decidedly prevailed -in the north, or north-west of our globe; and we received philosophy, -as well as art, in their highest perfection, from Greece, the then -most northern dwelling-place of civilized humanity. All the sciences -which, through their beneficial influence have promoted the welfare -and progress of humanity, were fostered in the North. In the North, -astronomy, geography, history, botany, zoology, physiology, anatomy, -chemistry, geology, and cosmogony were developed. - -The savage of the South, up to our days, does not go beyond an -ornamentation with geometrical figures; he can neither produce -animals nor the human figure. The Egyptians surpassed the Assyrians -and Babylonians in their monumental architecture, but in the plastic -reproduction of the human form they never succeeded. Their sitting -figures had legs and thighs forming right angles in the side view, -while in front they were parallel; the drapery was merely marked by -lines, rarely interrupted by folds. In their historical and allegorical -bas-reliefs the composition is devoid of elegance and correctness -of outlines; but they already showed a remarkable power in drawing -animals. The Indians reached a higher stage of progress in sculpture; -their mythology and poetry furnished them with a variety of subjects, -with which they covered the walls of their shrines and temples; after -the doctrines of Buddha became more universal, they attained grandeur -in their architecture, combined with a certain degree of elegance. The -human form is reproduced with ease; the proportions, though too soft, -too sensual, are more correct than with the Egyptians. - -So long as the Greek artists worked with reverence and modesty, -inspired by faith in the gods, they were capable of understanding -God's revelation of beauty in man's outer form. So long as the Romans -unconsciously worked in this spirit, they produced their stupendous -architectural monuments. When, however, State and citizens were forced -by false principles to war with reality for a beggarly existence, or -to plunge into mere sensuous enjoyments, man came to an open rupture -with his destiny, and humanity might have perished altogether in sin -and iniquity, had not Providence mercifully interfered by freeing, -through Christ, the 'inner man'--that is, the intellectual and moral -force in man--thus preparing humanity for a higher progressive life. -The south of Asia had to go through the same religious and artistic -phases of development. Buddhism stands to Brahmanism in the same -relation as Christianity to Mosaism and Heathenism. Excepting, however, -that both religions were reformations of older established creeds, -all analogy between them ceases. The proof of the difference lies -in the diametrically opposed development produced by Buddhism and -Christianity. It is true that Buddhism teaches us not to kill, not -to steal, not to lie, and not to be drunken. Christianity does the -same. Buddha, in twelve other ordinances, extols self-abnegation, -poverty, and commands all to meditate amongst the tombs on the fleeting -transitoriness of our earthly existence. Christianity does the same. -Christ, however, redeemed and freed our spiritual nature, and brought -it into a self-conscious, vivid activity; whilst Buddhism degraded this -higher _individual_ nature into a nonentity, denying that there was an -independent moral agent in us; teaching that we were phenomena of an -all-pervading divine power, by which universality we should be absorbed -after life. So long as Christianity held, though in a different shape, -nearly the same mystic principles as Buddhism, the results in art -were the same; for our ecclesiastical art was a revival of Buddhistic -temples, with all their divisions and sub-divisions, their pointed -arches, their variegated columns and pillars, the triforium, the altar -(Daghopa), cloisters, chapels, and crypts. - -Christ's divine words resounded at a period when the Greeks had long -turned their minds to the licentious worship of the sensuous. The -Egyptians, sighing under their Roman taskmasters, had taken refuge -in dark mysticism, the meaning of which had been long lost to them; -the Jews were divided into quarrelling sects, sunken in religious -indifference, or occupied with mere outward formalities, hating -everyone and hated by everyone. The Romans knelt tremblingly before -an imperial divinity, slaves and poor being considered mere burdens -on society; the rich were merciless, debauched, and revelled in -amusements; infanticides, suicides, murder and decay, despair and -annihilation, were every-day occurrences. At this period, under such -circumstances, the divine Master died on the cross, sealing with his -death the one great tiding of love: 'that we are all children of _one_ -Father, who is in heaven.' The god of revenge of the old world was -transformed into a God of inexhaustible love. With the Jews and the -ancients, he only was blessed who had plenty on earth; now, the pure -in mind, whether poor or rich, weak or mighty, beautiful or ugly, was -extolled. God was not merely present in the universe as its living -soul, or in a burning bush, in thunder and lightning, in growling -volcanoes, in an ark, a carved idol, a statue or in a temple. God -was present, wherever a kind, loving, and forgiving mind was ready -to be His ark or temple. Christ repudiated all local gods; did not -require any sacrifices of plants or animals; did not prescribe any -diet, or outward sanguinary sign; did not allow polygamy; did not -proclaim his followers the only _chosen_ children of the _Father of -All_; but taught the one and indivisible, and ever-true law of peace, -love, and tolerance. This doctrine is as universal as intellect; it -must be of as divine origin as intellect itself; it is, and can be, -the only faith which must once unite Humanity into one great loving -and beloved brotherhood. What a change! Not only a change; it was the -building up of a new glorious future; it was the re-establishment of -the lost balance between the working forces of humanity; it was the -redemption of our individual, moral, and intellectual capacities; it -was the enunciation of an eternal law, under which humanity had, till -then, unconsciously developed, but of which it became conscious in word -as well as in spirit, through Christ. Slavery in body or mind was, -at least in principle, for ever abolished; and one of the noblest -edifices of Byzantine architecture in Italy, the church of St. Vitale -at Ravenna, was dedicated by Justinian, a Roman Emperor, to the memory -of a slave, who was martyred for the sake of his piety and love. -Hospitals for the poor and sick, Xenodochia (refuges for strangers) -began to be built--architectural constructions of which the whole -ancient world could not boast. - -The Christian spirit at first struggled to find a corresponding form -in art; the new wine was put into the old vessels till it burst the -decaying fetters and issued forth in a life-giving art-stream, in two -directions:-- - -(_a_) As Romanesque art in the West, a decaying continuation of Roman -art; - -(_b_) As Byzantine art in the East, a revival of Asiatic art. - -The beginning of Christian plastic and pictorial art is to be looked -for in subterranean caves; in catacombs, used by Egyptians, Assyrians, -Persians, Greeks, Etruskans, and Romans as burial-places. The deep but -simple doctrines of Christ were at first hidden in symbols, types, -allegories and emblems. In a SYMBOL we try to express a general idea by -a special outward sign, totally heterogeneous in form to the meaning. -Geometrical figures, plants, and animals, furnish the elements of -symbolism. In the ALLEGORY the artist represents congruities, traces -connections, unites analogies and separates differences. Imagination -has in allegories an inexhaustible field for composition. TYPES are -signs, arbitrarily interpreted as meaning something, which they may or -may not mean. EMBLEMS with the Greeks were golden or silver figures -which could be detached from vessels. With the Romans the word was used -as a synonym for symbol or metaphor. They became with us Christians -signs in colours. White or blue was the emblem of innocence, red of -joy, black of mourning, green of hope, and purple of power or dignity. - -MYTHS generally had their origin in symbols and allegories, which found -interpreters, commentators, exegists, and expounders in the priests of -the ancient world. Later, the myths were taken up by poets and artists, -and the dogmatic explanations of mystic signs were transformed into -legends, tales, sagas, or even into historical facts. Nothing affords -greater delight to the inquisitive mind of man than a mystic sign! -The more unintelligible such a sign is, the more welcome it is to the -childish creature. Anything veiled in doubt, shrouded in a symbol or -type, has a peculiar charm. Anything that can only be guessed at, or -dimly felt, is more admired than that which lies clearly before our -perceptive faculty. 'Mysteries were taught in symbols, in darkness -at night-time; the symbolic itself is to be compared to night and -darkness,' says Demetrius. No wonder that symbols were adopted by the -first followers of Christ. They were too near to Egypt; the ancient -world had not yet altogether lost its hold on the minds of the masses, -and they could not have avoided availing themselves of forms which were -used by Indians, Greeks, Egyptians, or Romans. - -In the old catacombs of St. Sebastiano, St. Calisto, St. Lorenzo, and -Sta. Agnese at Rome, extending altogether to about 750 miles, and in -those of St. Gennaro de Poveri, Sta. Maria della Sanitá, and Sta. Maria -della Vita at Naples, we find some attempts at symbolism; the cross, -the monogram of Christ's name {CHR}; or an {AÔ}, symbolical of the -beginning and the end of all things; a palm branch, doves, the piscis -vesica, and here and there a lamb. But these signs belong to the fourth -and fifth centuries A.D. The inscriptions do not go farther back than -the second century. The homely simplicity of the early Christians is -distinctly to be traced in the absence of all symbolic decoration -during the first two centuries. Gradually the Christians passed through -the phase of geometrical ornamentation. Triangles and circles, crosses -and squares, squares divided into four squares, or the square taken -three times, giving twelve points, which number contains the sacred -numbers; three (the Trinity), five (the five sacred wounds of Christ), -seven (the seven cardinal virtues, or the seven days of Creation), -and twelve (the twelve apostles), made their appearance. Seven was a -holy and mystic number with all the ancient nations. There were seven -planets, and seven colours in olden times; Apollo's lyre had seven -strings; Pan used seven pipes for his flute. There are seven days of -the week; seven or three times seven are the critical days in medicine; -there were seven branches to the candlestick of the Jews in the Temple -of Jerusalem. Seven years Jacob had to serve for Leah; and seven others -for Rachel; seven were the ears and kine of which Pharaoh dreamt; seven -were the gods in Scandinavian mythology; seven were the sufferings of -the Virgin Mary; seven the cardinal virtues; seven the deadly sins; -seven are the sacraments of the Romish Church. We cannot fail to see -in the minutest details of history and art, philosophy and religious -systems, an eternally progressing 'one-ness' pervading humanity as a -great whole. - -Scarcely had the Christians adopted these signs, when they passed on to -the next phase, adorning churches and tombs, altars and sacred vessels, -with emblems taken from the vegetable and animal kingdoms, to serve as -the holy visible outward signs of some sacred inward grace or virtue. -What was immortal was to be expressed in mortal forms, and the finite -was to embody the infinite. Again, the meaning hallowed the form; -again, by degrees, the _form_ became all, and the spirit was altogether -lost through the mere outward sign. Art suffered for centuries under -the gloomy pressure of symbolism, and in striving to disentangle -itself, produced marvels, but it was only freed and attained higher -forms of beauty again, when humanity had gone back to those laws, which -when followed out had produced forms perfect in themselves. - -For centuries art revelled in the reproduction of symbolical crows, -eagles, peacocks, doves, gridirons, pitchers, beehives, oxen, -pigs, bulls, geese, violins, fishes, &c., as the attributes of St. -Sebastian, St. John, Sta. Barbara, St. Thomas of Aquin, St. Cyprian, -St. Narcissus, St. Bernard, St. Sebaldus, St. Anthony, St. Martin, -St. Genesius, St. Chrysogonus, &c. A whole science arose out of these -symbols and emblems: _Iconology_, which differs only in form from -mythology. The mere phenomena of nature were no longer embodied; the -individual spirit that lived in the form, became all in all. We were -thus introduced to a two-fold world by Christian art. - -(1) Into a spiritual world, in which our intellect moved, as it were, -in a circle. We took our beginning in the infinite, lost our transitory -bodily form, and returned to the infinite from which we emanated--a -kind of idealisation of the corporeal. - -(2) A world of external forms, which in their individual phenomena had -only a meaning as the fragile temporary vessels of the eternal Spirit; -this Spirit was no longer a universal sum total by which the individual -was hereafter absorbed, but was assumed to remain _individualised_ -through all eternity. Artists and men worked not only for this world, -but their deeds were to outlast all time to come. In this two-fold -world, Christian art went through the following phases:-- - -(_a_) Through a _historical_ phase, which commenced with Christ's -birth, life, death, and resurrection, as the new central point of all -things. The eternal Spirit was embodied, worked in a finite form, and -freed from it, regained its absolute divinity. This led in time to -sublime historical sketches in sculpture and painting. - -(_b_) Through a _religious_ phase. The spirit, freed and redeemed by -Christ, sought in deeds of harmonious love totally new spheres of -action. Crystals, flowers, trees, landscapes, animals and men, were -interwoven to proclaim not only outward beauty, as with the Greeks, -but a union of the inorganic and the organic, the ancient and the new -worlds, in honour of one God in three emanations or personifications. - -So long as bishops, priests, elders, deacons and laymen, were occupied -in trying to shape the new spirit into words, art appeared to slumber. -A too strong storm-wind of dissension on metaphysical niceties, of -mystic and dogmatic hair-splittings, hindered a plastic treatment of -Christianity. Gnostics, Nestorians, Manichæans, Donatists, Arians, and -Athanasians, &c., wasted the energies of the early Christian artists, -with their wild distinctions, their incomprehensible differences. -Quarrels as to whether a blessing was more efficacious when bestowed -with _three_ or only with _two_ uplifted fingers; whether crosses of -equal parts, or crosses in which one division was smaller than the -other, were more powerful, did not promote the productive ability of -artists. When, under Constantine, Christianity was elevated to the rank -of a State religion, churches were built in honour of the new faith. -In the West the Roman Basilicæ were given up to the religious worship -of the Christians, and in time, mixed with Teuton forms, produced the -Romanesque style. In the East a lively revival of Asiatic forms, of -Indian, Assyrian, and Babylonian patterns, took place, and from these -combinations we have the so-called Byzantine style. - -The general characteristics of the early Christian style, in which -the form of the Roman basilica predominated, were the following:--The -apsis, the seat of the bishop and clergy, was semicircular. Between -the apsis and the nave stood the altar, or rather the common table, -canopied by a baldachin supported by columns. The walls were covered -with figures of Christ. The main body consisted of a broad and lofty -central nave, on the two sides of which there were two lower passages, -divided by rows of columns, supporting the upper wall of the nave -either by a common architrave, or by strong circular arches. The upper -wall was provided with large broad windows, some being also placed -in the low walls of the side-aisles. The apsis was kept in mystic -darkness. - -The threefold division of the Indian, Egyptian, and Hebrew temples was -carefully kept up. The priests assembled in the apsis; the worshippers -in the hall or the galleries; and the penitents or sinners stopped at -the entrance. Of this period, we have the Basilica of Reparatus, in -Tingitanum (now Orléansville) in Algeria, and another in El Hayz, on -a small oasis, in the Libyan desert. In the former the pillars were -probably square, and the apsis is not marked outside. The latter is -furnished with vaulted aisles, adorned with pilasters and niches in the -Romano-Egyptian style. - -Under Constantine, Christian churches of larger dimensions were -constructed; marble decorations and a profusion of columns were common. -The five aisles still predominated, the Athanasians not having yet -succeeded in establishing the Trinitarian doctrine. St. Peter's at Rome -(rebuilt in the 16th century); Sta. Croce at Jerusalem, and the Church -of Sta. Maria at Bethlehem, built by Helena, the wife of Constantine, -were splendid specimens of the pure early Christian style. The transept -before the raised apsis was an innovation. The central aisle (the nave) -rises in independent loftiness. The galleries are dispensed with, as -the dimensions of the building are considerably increased. Light is -admitted through windows in the lofty central aisle. The lines all -tend towards the altar, and the high tribune. The nave is separated -from the transept by a lofty arch supported by pillars. The transept -is provided with broad windows, throwing the greatest amount of light -on the altar, by which means a sublime effect is attained. St. Peter's -at Rome, and Sta. Maria at Bethlehem, are provided with cross-beams, -which do not accord with the superstructure, which is too heavy. Before -these churches, in a court-yard, stood the fountain. These fountains -were common to all the Indian, Egyptian, and Hebrew temples, because -the _sanctity of water_ was recognised by all the religious sects of -the Southeast. _San Paolo fuori le mura_ belonged to this class of -churches. It was constructed by Theodosius and Honorius. 'The mighty -apsis, about eighty feet in breadth, is increased in effect by a lofty -transept, which stretches in front of it, across the whole nave. The -body of the church has five aisles. Eighty granite columns, connected -by circular arches, rise in four rows in order to divide the aisles, -and to support the upper wall of the central aisle, and the framework -of the roof. The main aisle opens into the transept with a broad and -lofty triumphal arch, which rests on two colossal columns. A splendid -atrium, surrounded with colonnades, was added to the front, completing -the plan of this basilica.' The high walls above the central isle -fulfilled a double purpose: they vividly expressed an expanding -tendency upwards, and filled the soul with the idea of the infinite. -This tendency was still more strongly expressed in ecclesiastical or -Gothic architecture. Scenes from the life of Christ and his disciples -were painted, and, in imitation of Roman decoration, gilded panels and -marble pavings were freely used. After the fourth century the five -aisles were gradually abandoned, and only three were used, symbolic -of the Trinity. We have here a kind of Indian or rather Buddhistic -renaissance. - -When Ravenna became the seat of the Byzantine Exarchs (viceroys), the -Ostrogoth influences which were perceptible under Theodoric vanished, -and a freer organisation of the sacred edifices was introduced by the -addition of an independent bell-tower, reminding us of the Buddhistic -towers or pillars, the Irish round towers, the minarets of the -Mahomedans, and the obelisks of the Egyptians. The tower rose in a -cylindrical form, without tapering. The roofs of the churches were -generally flat. Strong wall pillars, connected by _circular_ arches, -framed the windows as a repetition of the arcades below. The capitals -retained a double row of acanthus leaves, but the imposts became -stronger, taking the form of a coffin or a small altar, adorned with -crosses, or the monogram of Christ. The churches of St. Vitale and -St. Apollinare in Classe, are models of this transition style, which -formed the link between the Romanesque and the Byzantine. In these we -find Greek marble columns, profuse mosaics on gold grounds, panels and -medallions filled with historical scenes, or the portraits of bishops, -prophets, saints, and martyrs; the decoration is heavy in outlines, -the forms and figures too naturalistic; the taste gorgeous without -refinement; and the technical treatment rough and defective. - -Whilst the architectural and ornamental styles were receiving fixed -forms as the pure Romanesque of the West--through the influence of -the Teutons, who became masters of Italy and worked with greater -stiffness, simplicity, and angularity--Byzantine architecture assumed, -from the time of Justinian, a peculiarly pompous, Asiatic type. The -dome prevailed; the ground-plan was composed of squares and circles. -Ceremonies and mysteries borrowed from the Egyptians, Persians, and -Romans, and the division of priests into different castes, required -a different arrangement of the building. There was a place for the -high and one for the low clergy; another for the laymen; the galleries -were, in the old Jewish fashion, assigned to the women; and, lastly, -there was a place for the penitent. These divisions and subdivisions -induced confusion and disunion in the whole plan. Many of the Christian -buildings have become, in their turn, Mahomedan mosques, just as the -Roman basilicæ of old were turned into Christian churches. - -The mightiest and the most gigantic of all Byzantine churches is -undoubtedly that of St. Sophia, at Constantinople. First the building -was a temple dedicated to 'Holy Wisdom,' in the ancient or classic -meaning of the word. The edifice was destroyed by fire, and rebuilt -by Justinian in five years (A.D. 532-537). Twenty years later it was -much damaged by an earthquake. The injured dome was removed, raised -somewhat higher upon strengthened counterfoils, and finished A.D. 563. -The architects were Anthemis of Tralles, and Isidorus of Miletus. The -ground-plan, ornamentation, and construction, aim in combination at -one single result--surprise. There is a contradiction between lengths -and circles, destroying all effect of simple perspective. The various -cupolas, arches, and half-cupolas, connected with great technical -skill, have no organically united life. An antediluvian world opens its -gates to us. There is everywhere something astounding and gorgeous, -but we are unable to discern the necessity for the existence of the -parts, to form a coherent total. The galleries with their colonnades -puzzle us. The outer square-form, overtowered by a mighty cupola, -and by half-cupolas, is as incongruous as the ornamentation of the -interior. The shafts of the columns are amongst the finest specimens -of Roman architecture. Walls and pillars are adorned with variegated -marble panels in mosaic patterns. The roofs of the dome and semi-domes -are covered with gold mosaics, set in coloured ornamented frames, -interspersed with figurative tapestry-like representations. Christ, -saints, and prophets, are suspended in golden clouds. The effect on an -untutored mind is perfectly intoxicating. Though we do not underrate -the fully developed system of stone-roof construction, we must draw -the attention of our readers to the heavy and shapeless capitals with -the scarcely recognisable Ionic volutes, combined with Corinthian -leaf-work; all outlines being smothered by over-ornamentation, -destroying the beautiful effect of the antique by a clumsy impost. -Byzantine architecture remained stationary for hundreds of years. The -religious spirit went hand in hand with their stiff, lifeless art. -Ignorance and credulity engendered in the East a boundless intolerance -of all divergence of opinion, to which was added an equally boundless -toleration of falsehoods and frauds, so soon as these means served -to support the received opinions. An intellectual standstill was the -result of these principles, and acted on art, rendering it in general -as well as in detail an unwieldy mixture of Egyptian, Assyrian, Greek, -and Roman forms, overloaded with Asiatic filigree composed of lines -drawn from Christian symbolism. The Byzantine style of ornamentation -will always be, like that of China, a strange element to us. However -much the ingenuity of the winding, coiling, and recoiling lines, -interspersed with small and large jewels, may interest us, though we -may gaze at the profusion of gold mixed with gaudy colours with a kind -of vague bewilderment, Byzantine art can never appeal to our sense of -beauty. - -A most important branch of Byzantine ornamentation was the treatment -of metals. For flat decoration, in the style of embroidery, nothing -can excel the use of metal, be it gold, silver, bronze, or steel, or -a combination of all these. There was a fantastic originality in -these productions which, when combined with an assiduous study of the -antique, may aid us in many instances to produce excellent specimens -of book-covers, patterns for ornamented salvers, caskets, cups, -candlesticks, crosses, &c. Byzantine art, however, is the very opposite -of classic art. Repose, as a consequence of the liveliest vibration -of forms, and uniformity through a rich variation of patterns, are -the real elements of Byzantine and Oriental art; in contradistinction -to classic art, which is based on the authority of purpose and a -correct subordination of details. This is the reason why the free but -well-systematised ornaments of classic Greece were revived at this -period with Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian textile patterns in -metal, stone, or colours. Nothing could be more appropriate for this -mode of ornamentation than leaf-work, flowers, creepers, &c., in the -arrangement of which, the stern law of a well-regulated distribution of -the repeated forms must be observed, to bring about a thorough balance -between rest and vibration, variety and uniformity. - -Whilst Byzantium was exhausting all its powers, and socially and -artistically preparing to fall a prey to iconoclasts and Mahomedans; -the movement, next in importance to the establishment of Christianity, -viz. the migration of the Northern Teutons, took place. - -We intend to group Kelts, Normans, Franks, Ostrogoths, and Westrogoths -or Visigoths, Alemanni, Burgundians, Vinilians, Ingavorians, -Istavorians, Vandals, Saxons, Anglo-Saxons, Markomanni, Rugi, Ubi, -Gurgerni, Herulians, Bojoarians, Gepidi, Quadi, Marsingi, Sclavons, -&c., all under the one name of North-European Ayrans. It is an -imperative duty, with the art-historian, to group these scattered -elements together, according to some visible signs, which serve to -prove that, wherever we find an average facial angle of 90°, and -an amount of brain averaging 92 cubic inches, we have to deal with -the Aryan group of humanity. We avoid by this means divisions and -sub-divisions _ad infinitum_, and the danger of losing ourselves -in a labyrinth of petty national animosities and jealousies. Art, -based on ethnology, and a study of climatological influences, has -an immensely Christianising power. We see in the common language of -forms, a common bond between those who formed themselves into small -political communities, each in turn arrogating to themselves a kind -of _'chosen-people' superiority_, and turning their powers against -that very mother-stock from which they received life, vigour, a common -language, and a common mode of thinking on supernatural matters, and -the phenomena of nature. The Kelts, Normans, Saxons, Danes, Swedes, -Teutons, Germans (Garmans, Wahrmans, or Wehrmans, Brahmans), are all -of the same stock. Separated at different periods from their Trans-and -Cis-Himâlâyan ancestors, they lost more or less of their old religious -notions, customs, and manners, according to their lesser or greater -intermixture with the Turanian substrata of aborigines, who peopled -the countries wherein they settled. Next to the aspect of the country -in which they established themselves, its climate must be taken into -consideration. The Aryan, snowed in for six months in Scandinavia, or -living on the coasts of the Baltic, obliged to fight for every foot -of fertile ground with a boisterous and obstinate nature, must have -developed otherwise than the self-same Aryan who, as Kelt, took up his -abode on an island everlastingly green with refreshing verdure, and was -insulated from outer influences for long periods, being thus led to -look upon this detached spot as the very centre of the universe around -which the five parts of our globe, the myriads of suns, stars, planets, -and comets revolved. Between the Aryan-Kelt and the Aryan-Frank or -Norman, there will be a difference, brought about by the progress of -time and a freer intermixture with other branches of the mother-stock -who attained a higher kind of civilisation. The Aryans in India lost -themselves in metaphysical abstractions, and made of fire, water, and -air a theogony in which the anthropomorphic element was altogether -effaced. The Aryans in the north of Europe, in their cosmogony, held -to the original conceptions. They had to battle with fire, water, and -air, in the form of volcanoes, seas, rain, snow, hail and storms; and -finding that with their intellectual power they could master these -elements, they soon deprived them of their individual godhead, and -the whole earth, with its loves and passions, its kindnesses and -destructive tendencies, was looked upon as a living being. They also -knew of two regions on earth--not of a spiritually created paradise and -hell, but of a _Muspel-heim_ in the south, and a _Nifel-heim_ in the -north: the one giving warmth, heat, life; the other cold and death; -the one light, the other night; the one summer, and the other winter. -According to the Aryans of the north of Europe the first cosmical -heat produced the giant _Ymir_, or _Angelmir_, who was nourished by -the sacred cow _Audumbla_, from which ran four streams of milk, the -four seasons. Like Brahma, Ymir had a son and a daughter; the daughter -grew out of his arm, and the son out of his foot. The Brahman was the -outgrowth of Brahma's mouth: the Kshattriya sprung from his arms, -the Vaisya grew out of his thighs, and the S'udra out of his feet. -Ymir's son became the father of the Hirmthursen (giants). By licking -huge rocks of sandstone the cow became the mother of Buri. We thus -pass from the pastoral into the agricultural state, and have the -legend of Jupiter and Io before us. Buri had a son, Bor, who had three -sons. _Odin_, Guodan, Wuodan, Wodan, the All-pervader--the 'Allvater' -(father of all), _Willi_ and _We_--air, fire and water. Wodan was -also Baal, or the sun-god, in which capacity he had only _one eye_ -(the sun); he was also Apollo, the god of poetry, and of all things -that love light and goodness. He was also the warfaring god who led -the people to battle, and protected the valorous and virtuous. He had -to fight against the giant Ymir with his brothers. A reminiscence of -the wars of the Greek gods with the Titans, &c.; the Indian Vritaghna -or the Persian Veretaghna, with the evil spirits of darkness, or the -Egyptian Horus with Typhon. Out of the dead body of Ymir, the sons of -Bor created everything. They formed the earth of his flesh, the rocks -of his bones, the skull became heaven, and his blood furnished seas, -rivers, and streams. They then took four dwarfs and placed Austri (in -the East), Westri (in the West), Sudri (in the South), and Nordri (in -the North), to guard the four corners of the heavens. Wuodan then -embraced the earth, and created his mighty son _Thor_, Donar, Thunder, -the protector of his mother-earth, and the enemy of the wicked. He sent -his lightnings against giants, purified the air, dispersed frost and -cold, killed the demons of heat, silenced the destructive storms, built -bridges, made high-roads, furthered the intercourse of man with man, -and promoted civilisation. The second son of Wuodan was _Zio_ (Ziu, -Zeus, Jovis, Síva, also Tyr-Tiu or Tusco), the god of battles, the -destroyer. The third son was _Fro_ (Froho, Freyr, free), the happy god, -the god of love and marriage. Who does not recognise in Thor, Froh, and -Ziu--Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva--Jupiter, Apollo and Mars? As with the -Aryans on the Ganges, so also with those on the Rhine, the Elbe or the -Weser, and in Scandinavia, the passive element of nature was embodied -in female divinities. _Hertha_, Nerthus (the earth), corresponds -to S'ris, Hera, Ceres, Isis; _Holda_ is closely allied with Hilda, -Hela, Hell (the hidden), the goddess of death, Durga; and _Freyja_ -represents Venus, the goddess of love. These Aryans of northern Europe -were known to the ancients as Hyperboræans. They were tall, blue-eyed, -fair-haired, addicted to fighting, and sport. Some of them erected, -in analogy with Buddhists and Egyptians, long thin towers reaching -high into the air, pointing mystically upwards. The 'Crux Ansata' is -reproduced in the Irish crosses, and their mode of ornamentation, with -its twisted rope-like windings, and its serpent-like entanglements, -points to Indian patterns of a very ancient type. When these Aryans -of the north of Europe first dashed into the south, and destroyed -the Roman colossus, they embraced Christianity with all the fervour -of their unbiassed hearts. Entirely given up to the culture of the -wild powers of nature, free from all metaphysical subtleties--the -genuine men of wild oak, pine, and beech forests--they had no Vedas, -no Homer, no Zoroaster, no Hermes, and no Moses to forget; they, in -fact, only knew of an Allvater, because no two Teuton tribes held -the same opinions on metaphysics. They had only one common ground, -honest work--_industry_ (at those times concentrated on warfare); and -therefore they received Christianity with the greatest eagerness, and -became the only upholders, expounders, and propagators of a religion -for which their hearts were created. They recognised in Christ's words, -what they heard in whispers in their legends, and in the experiences -of their wild life--that we ought to love others as ourselves. They -added some of their old superstitions to the pure faith, which they -found already much impregnated with Egyptian, Roman, and Indian signs -and symbols. In the beginning, whilst Christianity was spreading all -over Europe, they cultivated a mixture of North European and Roman -forms in architecture as well as in ornamentation. They constructed -their churches with plans borrowed from ancient times, and freely used -geometrical symbols--for the sign of the Indian Trimurty, that of the -shields of David or Solomon, and that of the Trinity, did not differ. -The pentagram is still made on every loaf the Germans bake; it was -a Druidical mystic sign, and now serves good Christians to protect -their bread from being eaten by evil spirits. If we look at our Tudor -roses, or St. Katherine's wheels, we may clearly trace their origin -to the Zodiacs of Egypt, used as signs of the _Makrokosm_. The Teuton -minds found themselves suddenly dazzled by Christian theology. Greek, -Alexandrian, Nestorian, Arian, Athanasian, Jewish and Christian mystics -and casuists, already abounded in the sunny Muspel-heim, in which the -Teutons settled, and they had to exchange their gloomy, foggy, and -stormy Nifel-heim of reality, for a spiritual Nifel-heim of doctrinal -controversies. They turned their elfs and sprites, their kobolds and -gnomes, their spirits of air, water, and fire, into so many evil -spirits. They looked upon the literature of the Greeks and Romans, -of which they knew nothing, as the work of Beelzebub. Art was an -enchantress of the senses, and sculpture invented by the father of all -'lies,' to deceive us with mock-creatures, to seduce men, and to cheat -them of their share in everlasting salvation. In this gloomy spirit the -newly converted Teuton Christians built churches, and, sunken in the -most atrocious superstition, occupied themselves with the casting out -of devils. Nature was, in fact, one grand dwelling-place for demons. -Plague, poverty, and sickness, were attributed to the agency of the -enemy of mankind. Epileptic fits and insanity were signs that the demon -had taken possession of unfortunate wretches, who were either tormented -or put to death. Satan, with his legions of devils, continually -harassed mankind. To mortify and kill the body by fasting, chanting, -whipping, praying, and self-inflicted mortification, was thought the -only worthy and cheerful occupation of mankind. In addition to these -religious tendencies, wars were waged with merciless cruelty, either in -favour of, or against the new Christian superstition. A few so-called -_learned_ theologians studied the Jewish Cabala, Egyptian mysteries, -Zoroastrian magical calculations, Greek sophisms, and Alexandrian -Neo-Platonism. How could art have flourished under such circumstances? -Incantations, astrological calculations, alchemical experiments, were -the order of the day. The few learned men, whether architects or -others, as soon as they produced anything astounding, were said to have -received their ideas or plans, or their powers, from the devil. Who was -to create any beautifully shaped product of art, surrounded by such -misgivings? - -This struggle lasted for several centuries; until, stimulated by -movements in the far East, the Christian world left its secluded haunts -in cloisters, monasteries, churches, and castles, and mixed once more -with the outer world, and the whole gloomy medley of Christianised -northern mythology had to yield to new forms in art. - -Of this period we have a quantity of wood and ivory carvings, swords -in the form of crosiers, and crosiers in the form of swords, cups and -candlesticks, censers and pastoral staffs, diptichs and triptichs, -recording scenes from the life of Christ or of some saint. From the -third century down to the twelfth, year by year, artistic products of -ornamentation grew worse and worse. In the third century there was some -naturalness in the drapery, the folds being well executed; but in the -fifth century the treatment of the human figure deteriorated; folds -became more rope-like; Christ was represented as very young, with or -without a beard, often retaining the form of Apollo, or of Hermes, -carrying a lamb (the good shepherd). Bodies of saints and holy persons -grew more and more emaciated; the anatomy was altogether neglected. -After the Crusades in the twelfth century a marked improvement took -place, but everything was then impregnated with Mahomedan forms. -We should look with deep interest, and a sense of filial piety, on -these primitive attempts of Christian art; the execution is bad, but -the sentiments spread by their carvings, faulty designs, and poor -ornamentations, are always excellent. The artists address us in a rough -and unskilful manner, yet some spiritual truth awakens our better -nature to exalted feelings of love. This, however, teaches us that a -good feeling, a devout spirit, or a religious sentiment in the artists, -is not alone enough to produce works of art. - -Whilst Europe was expending its powers in the re-arrangement of the -disturbed social and religious relations of humanity, a new movement -arose which threatened to overwhelm the whole world. - -The new movement produced new art forms, which in their turn serve to -prove that art is a most important factor of civilisation. Till lately, -the erroneous notion that art is a mere superfluous luxury has appeared -to prevail with us. Art was placed by the ethicists in opposition to -morals, and scientists either altogether ignored it, or regarded it as -diametrically opposed to science--a pretty but useless toy. Art is -as necessary to man as either ethics or science. For man is endowed -with an emotional element, which must be satisfied and cultivated, in -order to raise him to the dignity of a human being using his esthetical -and intellectual faculties. It is vain to attempt to draw lines of -demarcation, between our component material and spiritual elements. -We recognise, or become conscious, through our _senses_; we sift the -impressions made on our senses by the power of our _intellect_: and we -regulate and arrange these impressions with the aid of our _reason_. -We may, therefore, strictly treat art scientifically, as well as -historically. For works of art may be considered under the following -heads:-- - -(_a._) As the concrete embodiments of man's thoughts; the importance of -the historical study of which cannot be too strongly insisted upon, for -through it we can best become acquainted with the past, from a social -and religious point of view. - -(_b._) As products that act upon our emotional, intellectual, and -reasoning faculties. It is our duty to endeavour to ascertain what -forms at different times, and under various impressions, acted most -agreeably on us. We must learn to know the causes that produced certain -art forms at certain periods, amongst certain people, under certain -intellectual, social, and religious conditions. We must inquire why -such forms flourished, decayed, or revived at different times. - -(_c._) We may examine the relations in which our subjective impressions -stand to the products of art, and learn how far such sensations -developed, in time and space, to lead us to the consciousness of beauty. - -From pre-historic times to the advent of Christ humanity was always -engaged as a busy artist. In studying the history of man we find that -art ushers us into life, gladdens the child, inspires the youth, -and interests the man. All our public actions, all our religious -ceremonies, our Court pageantry, our battles and funerals, all our -useful or useless surroundings, pass more or less through an artistic -process. In analysing the historical development of humanity at large, -or that of a nation, or even that of single individuals, we find that -our sensations, intellect, and reason have always been at work to -create something in their respective spheres. From the times of Plato -to our own all great thinkers have more or less occupied themselves -with the endeavour to establish the principles of beauty; just as from -Thales of Miletus, and Demokritos to Bacon, Kant, Darwin, and Häckel, -they have sought to discover the principle of truth; or from Manû, -Confucius, Moses, the Apostles, and Mahomet, to our own theologians, -they have striven to decide what is right or wrong. Art worked -synchronically with these endeavours, and its products are as numerous -and variegated as our philosophical systems, or our creeds and sects. -Moreover, works of art are, in many instances, far less perishable than -works of mere speculation. It becomes an imperative duty, therefore, to -study historically one of the most important branches of human activity -and ingenuity, which furnishes us in its very products with a record -in lasting forms, with at least the same ardour, earnestness, and -veneration, with which we devote ourselves to more varying, changing, -and perishable products. One fact must be obvious to every reader of -these pages--that real art has so exalted a sphere that it can only -exist to perfection wherever sciences and morals are highly cultivated. - -In cursorily summarising these pages, we find that wherever and -whenever beauty as the _ideal_, truth as the _real_, or goodness as the -_ethical_ element in humanity, has been one-sidedly cultivated, works -of art have not succeeded, for the harmony and union of these three can -alone be the aim of humanity. This harmonious union it is difficult to -attain, but we must endeavour to become historically conscious of the -continuous striving of humanity to bring it about. We find two forces -constantly at work in humanity--the one static (morals), the other -dynamic (intellect)--bent upon leading us to culture, progress, truth, -goodness, and beauty. In the fifth and at the beginning of the fourth -century B.C., for once in our development, and then only for a short -period, humanity undoubtedly succeeded in attaining a perfect balance -of its moral, intellectual, and esthetical faculties. We may well call -that period the golden age of mankind in art. We still live on the -mere interest of that immense capital which was left by the Greeks as -an imperishable legacy to humanity. Whatever the Greeks touched at -that period they transformed into pearls of beauty, gold of truth, and -jewels of goodness. They mounted the winged steed of imagination, and -were taken up to the bright heaven of pure idealisation, where they -saw boundless beauty in forms, and acquired an immortal striving after -truth and the eternal laws of goodness, based on the very organisation -of our complicated double nature. This dream of reality was short but -vivid. Humanity lives still in an ineffaceable longing and a burning -desire to regain that period. Like diamonds dropped in unknown ages in -small crystallisations into the sand of rivers, the works of Greece -appear in the stream of time, serving as a fundamental basis of beauty, -truth, and goodness. - -The well-balanced harmony was unfortunately soon disturbed. - -Giddy with victory and joy, the Greeks discarded ethics; truth was made -the handmaid of sophistry, superstition, and scepticism; and beauty, -in losing her ideal glory, sank into the depths of sensualism and -realism. The harmony of the triad, which artists, philosophers, and -moral teachers had succeeded in establishing, was destroyed, and a -discordant strain of melancholy woe resounded through history, echoing -here and there some remnants of the old and charming melodies. The -conquests of Philip of Makedon and Alexander the Great brought the -East into contact with the Greek spirit. The East furnished mystic -incomprehensibilities, and an egotistic hatred of all art that could -not be turned into money, or used for serving some deity to buy up its -good graces. Buddhistic tenets joined hands with Brahmanic conceits; -Egyptian symbols were intermingled with Hebrew practical enactments, -without any ideal aspirations. Greek philosophical diatribes were -used to prove the impossible possible, and the 'supernatural' most -natural. Some Greeks attempted to revive the antique mode of thinking, -but they were silenced by the Neo-Platonists, and thus the Greeks -themselves became the most successful apostles of unnaturally-shaped -superstitions, deadening the vivifying spirit of Christ's teachings. - -The Romans had only one aim in history--to regulate their conquests. -The State was everything with them; they taught us how to systematise -the actions of men, to make them useful citizens in this world, and, -when they left their legacy of infallible authority to the Romish -Church, how to prepare fit inhabitants for another world. The outward -realistic form, proclaiming some inward mystic grace or meaning, became -everything. Base hollowness in art and morals, vapid verbiage in -philosophy, unnatural profligacy and licentiousness, mean covetousness -and heartless egotism, brought humanity intellectually, morally, and -spiritually, to the brink of destruction. Everyone thirsted for a -change--reality was unbearable. - -Men strove, in deadening their bodies, to seek the salvation of their -souls. The realistic tendency of the degenerated ancient times gave -way to blind faith, which by degrees obtained an exclusive hold on the -ideal in man, ignoring his reflective and reasoning nature, working -only on the emotional, and burying antiquity under the gloomy ruins -of the Middle Ages. For more than 1000 years beauty had to yield to -mystic symbolism, truth to superstitious prejudice, and ethics to a -morbid sentimentality and a cruel hierarchical despotism. Dogmatic -scholasticism sought to foster elegance of forms; to create artistic -enthusiasm; but this attempt was vain. When, however, the dogmatic -ice began to melt in the burning rays of the rising sun of a freer -inquiry; when the Romish Church, anxious for some powerful helpmate to -check the rays of this sun, and work on the gloomy, stupified emotions -of the masses, called in to aid her the spirit of the Greeks in art, -she prepared a bright and happy future for humanity. The reformation -in art-forms, and the revival of the antique spirit in poetry, was -soon followed by a revival in science and ethics. Philosophy began to -unravel the mysteries of nature, and to make natural forces subservient -to man's wants and happiness. Ethics, based on freedom of thought, grew -day by day more powerful, and Greek forms were used in the purified -spirit of Christ, divested of strange and unintelligible dogmas. - -Having secured the right freely to store up the results of our -intellectual investigations, we must devote our artistic energies, -through an assiduous study of the historical development of art, to -a corresponding culture of our sense of beauty. This is essential, -if we hope to stand as high artistically, as we do technically and -mechanically. Without culture we cannot hope to vie with other -nations in high art, in historical paintings, frescoes, sculpture, -and architecture. A thorough knowledge of art-history will destroy -tasteless prejudices, and enable us progressively to develop the -past without becoming guilty of anachronisms. Inspired by the firm -conviction that the culture of taste leads to the very highest -development of ethics, and that art can only flourish in strict harmony -with truth and goodness, we can progress, but not otherwise. - -In this volume we have brought the reader down to the art of the -Mahomedans, and trust in a future work to trace the historical -development of art to our own times. What we have said in praise -of Greek art, must not be misunderstood to imply that, since it -flourished, we have not made gigantic progressive strides in -sculpture, architecture, and painting; but we have done so only when -we have worked in the Greek spirit, that is, on the principles which -stamped their works of art with perfection. - - - - -_BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR THE STUDY OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART._ - - - Agincourt, 'Histoire de l'Art par les Monuments'. 6 vols. Fol. - Paris, 1823. - - Asiatic Researches. - - - Birch, 'Ancient Pottery.' - - Blanc (Charles), 'Grammaire des Arts du Dessin.' Paris, 1870. - - Bohlen (von), 'Das alte Indian.' Königsberg, 1830. 2 vols. - - Bökh, Works, 1811. Leipzig. - - Botta and Flandin, 'Monuments de Ninive,' 1849. Paris. - - Boutell, 'Arms and Armour.' - - Brugsch, 'Histoire d'Egypte,' 1875. Leipzig. - - Bunsen, 'Place of Egypt in History of the World,' vol. 5. - - Burnouf, 'Introduction à l'Histoire du Buddhisme Indien.' Paris, - 1844. - - - Carrière (Moriz), 'Die Kunst im Zusammenhange der - Kulturentwickelung.' 5 vols. Leipzig; Brockhaus, 1871. - - Champollion, 'Lettres écrites de l'Egypte.' - - 'Christy, Museum Catalogue,' 103 Victoria Street. By A. W. Franks, - M.A., Curator. Photographs of same. - - Cox, 'History of Mythology of Aryan Nations.' - - Cox, 'Manual of Ancient Mythology.' - - Cox, 'Mythology of the Aryan Nations.' Longmans, 1870. 2 vols. - - Creuzer (Dr. Friedrich), 'Symbolik und Mythologie.' Leipzig and - Darmstadt, 1836. 4 vols. - - Curtius, 'History of Greece.' - - - Darwin, 'Expression of the Emotions.' London, 1872. - - Davis (Sir J. F.), 'China.' John Murray, 1857. - - Denon, 'L'Egypte.' - - D'Hancarville, 'Recherches sur l'origine, l'esprit et le progrès - des Arts de la Grèce.' London, 1785. - - Dyer, 'History of the City of Rome.' - - Dyer, 'History of Rome.' 1864. - - Dyer, 'Pompei.' - - - Eber (Dr.), 'Ægypten und die Bücher Moses.' Leipzig, 1868. - - Egypt, Guide to. Written by Wilkinson. John Murray. - - Engelhardt, 'Denmark in the Old Iron Age.' London, 1866. - - 'Ethnological Society Transactions,' 1869. _Easter Island._ - - - Fellows, 'Asia Minor and Lycia.' - - Fergusson (J.), 'Indian Architecture.' - - Fergusson (J.), 'Palaces of Nineveh and Persepolis Restored.' - London, 1851. - - Figuier, 'Earth and Sea.' 1870. - - Flaxman, 'Lectures.' - - 'Fortnightly Review'--Spencer's articles on _Nature Worship_. - Chapman and Hall. - - - Gailhabaud, 'Monuments de l'Architecture.' - - Gau (F. C.), 'Antiquités de la Nubie.' Paris, 1821-27. - - Gibbon, 'History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.' - - Gladstone (Right Hon. W. E.), 'Homeric Synchronism.' London, 1876. - - Gould (Baring), 'Origin and Development of Religious Belief.' - Rivingtons, 1869. - - Grote, 'History of Greece.' - - Guilleman, 'Heavens.' - - - Harrison (Charles), 'Catalogue of a Series of Photographs from the - Collection of the British Museum.' W. A. Mansell & Co. - - Hegel, 'Æsthetik.' Berlin, 1842. 3 vols. - - Hegel, 'Philosophy of History.' - - Herder, 'Ideen zur Geschichte der Menschheit.' Stuttgart, 1827. 4 - vols. - - Hirt, 'Monography of the Temple of Solomon.' - - Hutcheson, 'An Inquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of Beauty and - Virtue.' London, 1729. - - Hyde, 'Historiæ Religionis veterum Persarum.' Oxonii, 1700. - - - 'International Congress of Prehistoric Archæology.' 1868. - - - Jennings (Hargrave), 'The Rosicrucians.' London, 1870. - - Jones (Owen), 'Apology for Colouring the Greek Court of the Crystal - Palace.' - - Jones (Sir Wm.), Works. London, 1799. 6 vols. 4to. - - - Kant, 'Æsthetik.' Leipzig, 1838. - - King, 'Antique Gems.' - - Kingsborough (Lord), 'Antiquities of Mexico.' London, 1831-48. 9 - vols. Imp. Folio. - - Klaproth, 'Nouv. Jour. Asiat.' vol. 5. - - - Layard, 'Nineveh.' - - Lenormant, 'Manual of the History of the East.' 2 vols. Asher and - Co., 1875. - - Lepsius, 'Denkmäler.' Berlin. - - Lewes, 'Biographical History of Philosophy.' - - Lubbock, 'Origin of Civilization and Primitive Condition of Man.' - Particularly chapters on Religion, and page 119. 1870. - - Lubbock, 'Prehistoric Times.' - - Lübke (Dr.), 'History of Art.' Smith, Elder, and Co., 1868. - - - Madsen, 'Afbildinger af Danske Oldsager og Mindesmar.' Ker. - Kjöbenhavn, 1872. - - 'Manual of Ethnology.' John Murray. - - Mommsen, 'Römische Geschichte.' Berlin, 1868. - - Müller (C. O.), 'Ancient Art and its Remains.' London: B. Quaritch, - 1852. - - Müller (Max), 'Chips from a German Workshop.' Longmans, 1868. - - - Newton, 'Second Catalogue of Vase Rooms, British Museum.' - - Nott and G. R. Gliddon, 'Types of Mankind.' Dr. Morton. - - - Oppert (Dr. J.), 'Expéd. scient. en Mésop.' - - - Parthey (Dr.), 'De Philis insula ejusque monumentis commentatis.' - Berolini, 1830. - - Philosophy. See Smith's 'Dictionary of the Bible.' - - Piper (Prof. Ferdinand), 'Mythologie der Christlichen Kunst.' - Weimar, 1847. - - Potter, 'Antiquities of Greece.' Edinburgh, 1818. - - 'Pyramid Builders of the Mississippi.' - - - Rawlinson, 'Herodotus.' - - Rawlinson, 'Manual of Ancient History.' - - Rémusat (Abel), 'Mélanges Asiatiques.' vol. 1. - - - Sandreczki (C.), 'Reise nach Mosul und durch Kurdistan.' Stuttgart, - 1857. 4 vols. - - Schliemann (Dr.), 'Discoveries at Hassarlik.' - - Schnaase (Dr. E.), 'Geschichte der Bildenden Künste.' Düsseldorf, - 1866. - - Schwegler, 'History of Philosophy.' - - Sef (Abd Alla), 'Relation de l'Egypte traduite par Silvestre de - Sacy.' Paris, 1810. - - Semper (Dr.), 'Die Textile Kunst.' Frankfurt a. M., 1860. - - Shaftesbury (Earl of), 'Characteristics.' 1743. 3 vols. - - Smith, 'Ancient History.' - - Smith, 'Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities.' - - Spruner, 'Historical Atlas.' - - Squier and Davis, 'Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley.' - - Stephens, 'Runic Monuments.' 2 vols. London, 1866. - - Stevens, 'Flint Chips.' Bell and Daldy, 1870. - - Stuart & Revett, 'Antiquities of Athens.' London, 1827. - - - Taine, 'Lectures on Art.' - - 'Traveller's Art Companion.' _Principal Sculptors._ See pages 414 - _et seq._ - - 'Traveller's Companion, The.' Bell and Daldy, 1868. - - Tylor, 'Primitive Culture.' London, 1871. - - - Uhlemann (Dr. Max), 'Thoth oder die Wissenschaft der alten - Aegypter.' Göttingen, 1855. - - - Valeriani (Prof. Domenico), 'Etrusco Museo Chiusino.' Poligrafia - Fiesolana, 1839. - - Vaux, 'British Museum.' - - Vogüé (Le Comte de), 'Le Temple de Jérusalem.' Paris, 1864. - - - Wilkinson, 'Manners and Customs of Egyptians.' Murray, 1855. Small - edition. - - Winkelmann, Werke. 2 vols. - - Worsaae, 'Norse Antiquities.' Copenhagen, 1859. - - - Zerffi (Dr.), _Historic Art Studies_, with 1030 illustrations. - 'Building News,' 1872-6. - - - - -INDEX. - - - A, 84 - - {AÔ}, 272 - - Abulfeda, 35 - - Absolom, 150 - - Achaians, 180 - - Acherusian, 134 - - Achilles, 184 - - Action, 16 - - Adoniram, 146 - - Æneas, 234 - - Æsop, 242 - - Ætna, 215 - - Agamemnon, 185 - - Ageladas, 193 - - Agesander, 207 - - Agincourt, 225 - - Agodhyá, 77 - - Agrômainyus, 89 - - Ahriman, 89 - - Ahura-Mazda, 89 - - Albans, 233 - - Alemanni, 283 - - Alexander the Great, 87 - - Alkibiades, 201 - - Alkmene, 185 - - Allegory, 270 - - Allvater, 286 - - Amn, 114 - - Amphiprostyle, 176 - - Anaxagoras, 193 - - Ancus Martius, 235 - - Andromeda, 250 - - Angeians, 180 - - Angelmir, 286 - - Antætemple, 176 - - Anthemis of Tralles, 281 - - Antiope, 208 - - Antonines, 258 - - Anubis, 117 - - Apis, 189 - - Apollo at Bassæ, 200 - - Apollo (Saurokthonos), 206 - - Apollo (Smintheus), 203 - - Apollodorus, 256 - - Apollonius, 207 - - Archaic-Doric, 178 - - Arch (Roman), 245 - - Ariadne, 190 - - Arians, 275 - - Aristotle, 187 - - Arkadia, 200 - - Arno, 213 - - Artemis of Ephesus, 189 - - Aryan, 26 - - Asar, 214 - - Asioatha, 80 - - Asklepios, 196 - - Asphaltites, 134 - - Athanasians, 275 - - Athene Promachos, 195 - - Athenodorus, 207 - - Atlas, 164 - - Atos (Akotus), 108 - - Attic-Doric, 178 - - Audumbla, 286 - - Augustus, 252 - - Aurelius Commodus, 241 - - Azer-Abad, 89 - - - Babylon, 97 - - Baltic, 285 - - Barucchi, 105 - - Bachante, 204 - - Basilica of Reparatus, 277 - - Beautiful, 3 - - Beelzebub, 290 - - Bendemir (Araxes), 91 - - Bengallee, 82 - - Bhîma, 159 - - Boaz, 148 - - Böckh, 104 - - Book of Deliverance, 113 - - Bor, 286 - - Botta, M., 88 - - Brahma, 64 - - Brahman, 85 - - Brahmapootra, 60 - - Bronze (age), 33 - - Brugsch, 105 - - Bryaxis, 205 - - Buddha, 75 - - Bunsen, 105 - - Burgundians, 284 - - Buri, 286 - - Byzantine, 270 - - Byzes of Naxos, 191 - - - Cadam, 89 - - Cainozoic, 180 - - Caracalla, 260 - - Carthage, 236 - - Carrios, 41 - - Catulus, M., 251 - - Cavoedium, 217 - - Celerus, 254 - - Chalúkyan, 82 - - Champ-levé, 131 - - Champollion, 104 - - Cheops (Shufu), 119 - - Chephren (Shafra), 120 - - Chichen, 42 - - Chimera, 168 - - Chinese language, 46 - - Chinese trellis-work, 50 - - Chiron, 185 - - Choda (Gott, God), 84 - - Christianity, 263 - - Chuda (Khuda, Svadâtta), 84 - - Cicero, 242 - - Cis-Himâlâyans, 61 - - Claudius, 253 - - Cleopatra, 253 - - Cloisonné, 131 - - Clusium, 218 - - Coati, 40 - - Colosseum, 255 - - Compluvium, 217 - - Confucius, 47 - - Constantine (triumphal arch), 256 - - Contractura, 175 - - Copan, 42 - - Corichanca, 41 - - Corneto, 220 - - Cortona, 213 - - Cranoges, 37 - - Crassus, L., 251 - - Critical (School of Art), 8 - - Cross-vault (Roman), 245 - - Crusades, 292 - - Crystallisations, 12 - - Cupid, 69 - - Cupola (Roman), 245 - - Cuzco, 41 - - Cynerary chests, 217 - - - Daghopa, 79 - - Daidalos, 190 - - Danaians, 180 - - Dante, 240 - - Dea Cloacina, 239 - - Dead (book of the), 112 - - Delphos, 188 - - Demeratos, 221 - - Demeter, 161 - - Demetrius, 271 - - Dempster, 225 - - Derush, 141 - - Devaki, 70 - - Dews (Devas), 96 - - Dialectic, 63 - - Dibutades, 181 - - Diodorus (Siculus), 100 - - Diogenes Laertius, 111 - - Diopos, 221 - - Dipteros, 176 - - Diptichs, 291 - - Dirkê, 208 - - Disk heresy, 105 - - Divespitar, 67 - - Donatists, 275 - - Dös (Dyss, or Dolmens), 35 - - Dordogne, 34 - - Doric, 173 - - Dshemshid, 90 - - Dshey-Afram, 89 - - Dravidian, 82 - - Durga, 69 - - Dypuc, 69 - - - Echidna, 168 - - Eight Periods of Jewish History, 139 - - Echetlos, 215 - - Eirene, 202 - - Elbruz, 94 - - Elektra, 185 - - El Hayz, 277 - - El Kassr, 98 - - Encaustum, 131 - - Entasis, 176 - - Epimetheus, 164 - - Epistyle, 176 - - Erato, 165 - - Erechtheium, 179 - - Eriene Veedjo (Iran Veji), 89 - - Eros, 204 - - {êthos}, 188 - - Etruskans, 212 - - Etruskan style, 225 - - Euchier, 221 - - Eugrammos, 221 - - Euripides, 201 - - Eurythmy, 13 - - Euxine, 244 - - Euterpe, 165 - - Exarchs, 279 - - Expression, 16 - - Ezekiel, 139 - - - Farnese Bull, 207 - - Fascine constructions, 37 - - Faust, 164 - - Feather ornament, 126 - - Fervers, 96 - - Ficus Indica, 80 - - Ficus religiosa, 81 - - Figeac, 104 - - Flavians, 247 - - Fora (Civilia), 252 - - Fortuna Virilis (temple of), 251 - - Forum Trajanum, 255 - - Franks, 283 - - Freyja, 288 - - Froh (Freyr), 287 - - - Gæa, 160 - - Galpones, 41 - - Gânesa, 67 - - Ganges, 60 - - Ganymede, 68 - - Garuda, 68 - - Gepidi, 284 - - Geryon, 168 - - Ghandarvas, 200 - - Giallo antico, 262 - - Glaukos, 191 - - Glypthotek, 203 - - Gnostics, 275 - - Gurgerni, 284 - - - Hadrian, 247 - - Hal-her, 116 - - Hamadan (Erbatana), 92 - - Hamilton (Lord), 183 - - Hanau, 41 - - Harris, 73 - - Harpies, 219 - - Hassarlik, 189 - - Hathor-masks, 125 - - Herakles, 159 - - Hekatoncheires, 162 - - Hektor, 184 - - Hermetic books, 104 - - Here, 161 - - Herodotus, 35 - - Hertha (Nerthus, Earth), 288 - - Herulians, 284 - - Hes (Isis), 117 - - Hesiri (Osiris), 117 - - Hestia, 161 - - Hieratic style, 125 - - Hieroglyphs, 108 - - Hierogrammatists, 111 - - Hillel (Rabbi), 104 - - Himeros, 204 - - Hincks, 105 - - Hirmthursen, 286 - - Historical (School of Art), 7 - - Hittites, 34 - - Holda, 288 - - Horace, 242 - - Horoskopus, 111 - - Horus, 117 - - Hurin, 41 - - Hyksos, 105 - - Hypæthral, 176 - - - Ideography, 108 - - Iphikrates, 193 - - Iliad, 184 - - Impluvium, 217 - - Ingavorians, 284 - - Indus, 60 - - Ionic, 173 - - Iron (age), 33 - - Isidorus of Miletus, 281 - - Istavorians, 284 - - Is'wara, 69 - - Itza, 42 - - - Jachin, 148 - - Janus, 67 - - Japetós, 160 - - Jordan, 134 - - Jordanes, 34 - - Jugurtha, 237 - - Julius Cæsar, 251 - - - Ka, 84 - - Kadmus, 157 - - Kalamis, 193 - - Kaledonian (boar), 202 - - Kaliphs, 87 - - Kaliya Nága, 71 - - Kalliope, 166 - - Kansa, 70 - - {katharsis}, 188 - - Kentaur, 218 - - Kekrops, 157 - - Kelts, 283 - - Kenrick, 105 - - Kentimanos, 160 - - Kephisodotus, 202 - - Kha, 84 - - Kham (Ham, Chemnus), 106 - - Khem, 114 - - Khai-Khorus (Kyrus), 87 - - Kimon, 190 - - Klio, 165 - - Kneph, 116 - - {koniasis}, 173 - - Korinthian, 173 - - Koroebus, 181 - - Kouyunjik, 93 - - Krishna, 70 - - Kronos, 160 - - Kshattriya, 85 - - Ktesias, 100 - - Kynic, 187 - - Kyprus, 44 - - Kyrenæic, 187 - - - Labyrinth, 123 - - Lake-dwellings, 35 - - Laokoön, 207 - - Lapis lazuli, 262 - - Laplanders, 34 - - Lauth, 106 - - Layard, R. H., 88 - - Leah, 273 - - Lekythus, 186 - - Leochares, 205 - - Lepsius, 105 - - Lernean serpent, 168 - - Li-king, 47 - - Lotus, 126 - - Lukeres, 233 - - Lysippus, 201 - - - Maccabees, 133 - - Mahâbhârata, 73 - - Makedonian-Doric, 178 - - Makrokosm, 289 - - Mal'hurâ, 71 - - Man (Jao), 116 - - Manasseh Ben Israel, 135 - - Mania, 223 - - Manichæans, 275 - - Mantus, 223 - - Manurra, 251 - - Marcus Aurelius, 258 - - Markomanni, 258 - - Masaya, 39 - - Mastadon, 213 - - Mausoleum (of Augustus), 253 - - Mausolos at Halikarnassus, 205 - - Medea, 250 - - Medusa, 185 - - Mêlas, 191 - - Melpomene, 165 - - Memnonium, 123 - - Memnons, 124 - - Memphis, 106 - - Mem-tsu, 47 - - Menes, 106 - - Menkerynus (Menkare), 120 - - Meshiah, 155 - - Metis, 161 - - Metopes, 176 - - Miaos, 53 - - Miltiades, 196 - - Milton, 240 - - {mimêsis}, 188 - - Module, 174 - - Moltke, 41 - - Moses, 141 - - Motion, 16 - - Murghab, 92 - - Muspel-heim, 286 - - Mut, 114 - - Myths, 271 - - - Naksh-i-Rustam, 92 - - Negro, 23 - - Neolithic, 33 - - Nero, 253 - - Nestorians, 275 - - Net, 115 - - Nifel-heim, 286 - - Niké, 185 - - Nineveh, 97 - - Ninus, 90 - - Niobe, 206 - - Normans, 283 - - Num (Nu), 114 - - Numa Pompilius, 234 - - Nundi, 189 - - - Odin, 286 - - Okeanos, 160 - - Oligochromatic, 182 - - Olympian, Pythian, Nemæan, and Isthmian games, 171 - - Onatas, 193 - - Opisthodome, 175 - - Opus plumarium, 54 - - Orchia, 219 - - Ormuzd, 89 - - Orpheus, 157 - - Ostrogoths, 283 - - Ovid, 242 - - - Palenque, 42 - - Palm-tree, as ornament, 126 - - Palæolithic, 33 - - Pantheon, 253 - - Paphos, 145 - - Papyrus, as ornament, 126 - - Parsagad (Passagarda or Persepolis), 91 - - Parthenon, 197 - - Pátála, 71 - - Paulastya, 68 - - Pelasgians, 180 - - Penelope, 184 - - Pentagram, 289 - - Per-ao (Pharaoh), 107 - - Perigord, 34 - - Perikles, 193 - - Peripteros, 176 - - Peshat, 141 - - Perseus, 185 - - Perseus, 250 - - Phædrus, 242 - - Pheidias, 193 - - Phigalia, 200 - - Philesian Apollo, 171 - - Phtah, 115 - - Pile-dwellings, 36 - - Pindar, 224 - - Planimetric, 17 - - Plato, 187 - - Plautus, 242 - - Pluton, 161 - - Pluton, 202 - - Polychromatic, 182 - - Polydoros, 207 - - Polyhymnia, 165 - - Polykrates, 191 - - Pompey, 143 - - Pontos, 160 - - Poseidon, 161, 203 - - Posticum, 175 - - Pothos, 204 - - Prasias, 35 - - Prathama-Raja, 75 - - Praxiteles, 193 - - Præneste (Palestrina), 220 - - Prometheus, 164 - - Prophets, 112 - - Proportion, 19 - - Prostyle, 176 - - Proteus, 159 - - Proto-Doric, 178 - - Ptolemaic style, 129 - - Punic war, 236 - - Pythagoras of Regium, 193 - - - Quadi, 284 - - Quatusco, or Huatusco, 40 - - - Ra (with the Persians), 84 - - Ra, 115 - - Rachel, 273 - - Radamanthus, 223 - - Ramâyâna, 73 - - Ramnes, 233 - - Ravenna, 279 - - Realistic (School of Art), 7 - - Remes, 141 - - Rhoekos, 191 - - Roma (Amor), 229 - - Romanesque, 270 - - Romulus and Remus, 234 - - Rosetta-stone, 104 - - - Sabines, 233 - - Sacred books (of the Egyptians), 111 - - Sacsahuaman, 41 - - Sallust, 242 - - Samoyedes, 34 - - Sanchi Tope, 76 - - San Paolo fuori le mura, 278 - - Saul, 132 - - Scandinavia, 285 - - Scaurus, M., 251 - - Schliemann (Dr.), 189 - - Seb (Kronos), 116 - - Semiramis, 90 - - Septimus Severus, 247 - - Servius Tullius, 235 - - Seti, 115 - - Shi-king, 47 - - Shoo-king, 47 - - Siamek, 90 - - Skopas, 201 - - Skylla, 168 - - Smilis, 191 - - Sod, 141 - - Solomon, 138 - - Sophokles, 171 - - Sphinx, 168 - - Sphinxes (six kinds of), 120 - - S'rî, 68 - - Sta. Agnese, 272 - - Sta. Barbara, 274 - - Sta. Croce at Jerusalem, 277 - - Sta. Maria at Bethlehem, 277 - - St. Apollinare in Classe, 279 - - St. Calisto, 272 - - Stereometric, 17 - - Stiens (of Cambodia), 35 - - St. John, 274 - - St. Katherine's wheel, 289 - - St. Lorenzo, 272 - - Stolists, 112 - - St. Peter's at Rome, 277 - - St. Sebaldus, 274 - - St. Sebastian, 274 - - St. Sebastiano, 272 - - St. Sophia, 280 - - St. Vitale, 279 - - Sublime, 3 - - S'udra, 85 - - S'wa, 64 - - Symbol, 270 - - Symbolic, 63 - - Symmetry, 13 - - Syrakuse, 236 - - - Tachyno, 35 - - Tahamur, 90 - - Tarquinius Priscus, 235 - - Tarquinius Superbus, 235 - - Tartaros, 162 - - Tauriskos, 207 - - Tacitus, 242 - - Telos, 181 - - Temple, Egyptian, 122 - - Teni (This, Thinis), 106 - - Teotl, 39 - - Terence, 242 - - Terpsichore, 165 - - Teth (Toth, Hermes), 116 - - Thales, 213 - - Thalia, 165 - - Thebes, 123 - - Themistokles, 193 - - Theodorus, 191 - - Thera, 182 - - Thermæ, 253 - - Thor, 287 - - Thukydides, 193 - - Tiberius, 253 - - Timotheos, 205 - - Tingitanum, 277 - - Titicaca, 40 - - Titians, 233 - - Titus Livy, 242 - - Tombs, Egyptian, 120 - - Trajan, 247 - - Trans-Himâlâyans, 61 - - Tree of Art, 28 - - Triglyphs, 176 - - Trilôchana, 69 - - Trimurty, 65 - - Triophthalmos, 70 - - Tritons, 203 - - Tsem-tsu, 47 - - Tshao-Pings, 52 - - Tshil-Minar, 91 - - Tudor roses, 289 - - Tulasi, 71 - - Tullus Hostilius, 234 - - Turanian, 24 - - Tuscanicum, 217 - - Types, 271 - - Typhon (Nubi, or Set), 116 - - Tyrrhenian, 181 - - - Uhleman, 105 - - Ulpia (Basilica), 256 - - Ulysses, 184 - - Unger, 106 - - Urania, 165 - - Uranus, 160 - - Uræus, 129 - - Uxmal, 42 - - - Va, 84 - - Vaisya, 85 - - Vandals, 284 - - Vauban, 41 - - Veretaghna, 287 - - Vesta, 251 - - Vesuvius, 222 - - Via Sacra, 255 - - Vinitians, 284 - - Virgil, 242 - - Vishnu, 64 - - Viterbo, 219 - - Volaterra, 218 - - Volci, 218 - - Vritaghna, 287 - - Vurka, 98 - - - Xp, 272 - - Xenophon, 193 - - - Yachahnasi, 41 - - Yamuná, 71 - - Y-King, 47 - - Ymir, 286 - - Yo-king, 47 - - Young, Dr., 104 - - - Zacharias, 150 - - Zahok, 90 - - Zarathustra (Zerdusht, Zoroaster), 94 - - Zedekiah, 132 - - Zend-Avesta, 88 - - Zeruane-Akerene, 95 - - Zeus, 162 - - Zorobabel, 142 - - Zui (or Tui, Tuisco), 287 - - - LONDON: PRINTED BY - SPOTTISWOODE AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUARE - AND PARLIAMENT STREET - - - - - * * * * * * - - - - -Transcriber's note: - -Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant -preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not changed. - -Simple typographical errors were corrected. - -Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were retained. - -Transcriber-added descriptions of some illustrations are in -parentheses, like this: [Illustration: (description)]. - -Some words were printed both with and without accent marks. The ones -clearly meant to be the same (e.g., Index references to the other form) -were changed; the rest appear both ways. - -Greek and symbols not in the Latin-1 or ASCII character sets have -been transliterated or substituted in those versions of this eBook. -The original letters and symbols might appear in the UTF-8 and HTML -versions. Devices unable to display such characters may substitute -question marks or other placeholders. - - - -***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL -DEVELOPMENT OF ART*** - - -******* This file should be named 44509-8.txt or 44509-8.zip ******* - - -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: -http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/4/4/5/0/44509 - - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at - www.gutenberg.org/license. - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 -North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email -contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the -Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/44509-8.zip b/44509-8.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index d93d614..0000000 --- a/44509-8.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/44509-h.zip b/44509-h.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 4f1e0f9..0000000 --- a/44509-h.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/44509-h/44509-h.htm b/44509-h/44509-h.htm index 30871fd..fe54d00 100644 --- a/44509-h/44509-h.htm +++ b/44509-h/44509-h.htm @@ -283,27 +283,10 @@ span.locked {white-space:nowrap;} </style> </head> <body> +<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44509 ***</div> <h1 class="pg">The Project Gutenberg eBook, A Manual of the Historical Development of Art, by G. G. (Gustavus George) Zerffi</h1> -<p>This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at <a -href="http://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a></p> -<p>Title: A Manual of the Historical Development of Art</p> -<p> Pre-Historic--Ancient--Classic--Early Christian; with Special Reference to Architecture, Sculpture, Painting, and Ornamentation</p> -<p>Author: G. G. (Gustavus George) Zerffi</p> -<p>Release Date: December 25, 2013 [eBook #44509]</p> -<p>Language: English</p> -<p>Character set encoding: UTF-8</p> -<p>***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART***</p> <p> </p> -<h4 class="center">E-text prepared by David Garcia, Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe,<br /> - and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team<br /> - (<a href="http://www.pgdp.net">http://www.pgdp.net</a>)<br /> - from page images generously made available by the<br /> - Google Books Library Project<br /> - (<a href="http://books.google.com">http://books.google.com</a>)</h4> <p> </p> <table border="0" style="background-color: #ccccff;margin: 0 auto;" cellpadding="10"> <tr> @@ -10856,360 +10839,6 @@ substitute question marks or other placeholders.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> -<hr class="full" /> -<p>***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART***</p> -<p>******* This file should be named 44509-h.txt or 44509-h.zip *******</p> -<p>This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:<br /> -<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/4/4/5/0/44509">http://www.gutenberg.org/4/4/5/0/44509</a></p> -<p> -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed.</p> - -<p> -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. -</p> - -<h2>*** START: FULL LICENSE ***<br /> - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE<br /> -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</h2> - -<p>To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at -<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/license">www.gutenberg.org/license</a>.</p> - -<h3>Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works</h3> - -<p>1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.</p> - -<p>1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below.</p> - -<p>1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.</p> - -<p>1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States.</p> - -<p>1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:</p> - -<p>1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed:</p> - -<p>This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at <a -href="http://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a></p> - -<p>1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9.</p> - -<p>1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.</p> - -<p>1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.</p> - -<p>1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License.</p> - -<p>1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.</p> - -<p>1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.</p> - -<p>1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that</p> - -<ul> -<li>You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."</li> - -<li>You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works.</li> - -<li>You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work.</li> - -<li>You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.</li> -</ul> - -<p>1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.</p> - -<p>1.F.</p> - -<p>1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment.</p> - -<p>1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE.</p> - -<p>1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem.</p> - -<p>1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.</p> - -<p>1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.</p> - -<p>1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.</p> - -<h3>Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm</h3> - -<p>Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life.</p> - -<p>Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and -the Foundation information page at <a -href="http://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a></p> - -<h3>Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation</h3> - -<p>The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.</p> - -<p>The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 -North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email -contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the -Foundation's web site and official page at <a -href="http://www.gutenberg.org/contact">www.gutenberg.org/contact</a></p> - -<p>For additional contact information:<br /> - Dr. Gregory B. Newby<br /> - Chief Executive and Director<br /> - gbnewby@pglaf.org</p> - -<h3>Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation</h3> - -<p>Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS.</p> - -<p>The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit <a -href="http://www.gutenberg.org/donate">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a></p> - -<p>While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate.</p> - -<p>International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.</p> - -<p>Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: <a -href="http://www.gutenberg.org/donate">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a></p> - -<h3>Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works.</h3> - -<p>Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.</p> - -<p>Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.</p> - -<p>Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: -<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a></p> - -<p>This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.</p> - +<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44509 ***</div> </body> </html> diff --git a/44509.txt b/44509.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 72d182f..0000000 --- a/44509.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9506 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg eBook, A Manual of the Historical Development of -Art, by G. G. (Gustavus George) Zerffi - - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - - - - - -Title: A Manual of the Historical Development of Art - Pre-Historic--Ancient--Classic--Early Christian; with Special Reference to Architecture, Sculpture, Painting, and Ornamentation - - -Author: G. G. (Gustavus George) Zerffi - - - -Release Date: December 25, 2013 [eBook #44509] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII) - - -***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL -DEVELOPMENT OF ART*** - - -E-text prepared by David Garcia, Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe, and the Online -Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images -generously made available by the Google Books Library Project -(http://books.google.com) - - - -Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this - file which includes the original illustrations. - See 44509-h.htm or 44509-h.zip: - (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/44509/44509-h/44509-h.htm) - or - (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/44509/44509-h.zip) - - - Images of the original pages are available through - the Google Books Library Project. See - http://www.google.com/books?id=sqIZAAAAYAAJ - - -Transcriber's note: - - Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_). - - Text enclosed by equal signs is in bold face (=bold=). - - Greek transliterations are enclosed by curly braces - (example: {kosmos}). - - The transcriber's descriptions of illustrations are in - parentheses. - - - - - -A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART. - - -[Illustration: CHART OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART.] - - -A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART - -Pre-historic--Ancient--Classic--Early Christian - -With Special Reference to Architecture, Sculpture, Painting, -and Ornamentation - -by - -G. G. ZERFFI, PH.D., F.R.S.L. - -One of the Lecturers of H. M. Department of Science and Art. - - - - - - - -London: -Hardwicke & Bogue, 192 Piccadilly, W. -1876. - -London: Printed by -Spottiswoode and Co., New-Street Square -and Parliament Street - -The right of translation is reserved. - - - - - This Book is Inscribed - TO - E. J. POYNTER, ESQ., R.A. - - DIRECTOR OF THE ART TRAINING SCHOOLS, - SOUTH KENSINGTON, - - IN RECOGNITION OF HIS GENIUS AS A PAINTER, - AND OF - HIS UNTIRING EFFORTS IN PROMOTING - HIGHER ART EDUCATION. - - - - -PREFACE. - - -An experience of more than eight years as Lecturer on the 'Historical -Development of Art,' at the National Art Training School, South -Kensington, has convinced me of the necessity for a short and concise -Manual, which should serve both the public and students as a guide to -the study of the history of art. In all our educational establishments, -colleges, and ladies' schools, the study of art-history, which ought to -form one of the most important subjects of our educational system, is -entirely neglected. To suggest and to excite to such a study is the aim -of this book. It would be impossible to exhaust in a short volume even -that section of the subject which I propose to treat, and the most that -can be done is to give outlines, which must be filled in by further -studies. - -Art is at last assuming a better position with us, thanks to the -influence of the lamented Prince Consort, to whom we undoubtedly owe -the revival of the culture of sciences and arts, and the indefatigable -exertions of the Government, aided by munificent grants of Parliament. -But much more is to be desired from the public. If the 'National -Association for the Promotion of Social Science' is a faithful mirror -of our intellectual stand-point, we certainly have not yet attained a -very high position as an artistic national body. For twenty years the -Association has met and has discussed a variety of topics, and this -year, for the _first_ time, it occurred to the learned socialists that -there was such a factor in humanity as art, and the congress allowed -an art-section to be opened under the presidency of Mr. E. J. Poynter, -R.A., the director of the 'National Art Training School.' _Four_ -questions were proposed for discussion, and I gave anticipatory answers -to these, before the congress was opened, in my introductory lecture to -the students of the Art Training School. These answers will serve as so -many reasons for the issue of this book, and I therefore reproduce them -here, with the questions to which they refer. - -1. 'What are the best methods of securing the improvement of Street -Architecture, especially as regards its connection with public -buildings?' - -_Answer._--Architects must be trained in art-history to prevent them -from committing glaring anachronisms in brick, mortar, stone, iron, -wood, or any other building material. Our street architecture cannot -improve so long as we allow any _original_ genius to _copy_ mediaeval -oddities, and revive by-gone monstrosities at random, in perfect -contradiction to the spirit of our times. - -2. 'How best can the encouragement of Mural Decoration, especially -Frescoes, be secured?' - -_Answer._--This might be attained by enlarging the area of national -interest beyond horse-racing, pigeon-shooting, and deer-stalking, the -buying of old china, mediaeval candlesticks, ewers and salvers, or of -old pictures, that can scarcely be seen; and extending our general -art-support to our own talented artists, even though they may not -all be Michael Angelos or Raphaels. We could allow them to decorate -the walls of our town-houses, public buildings, chapels, churches, -banks, and museums. We must, however, first train their minds to a -correct appreciation of art-history, of the world's history, and of the -glorious History of England, thus enriching their imaginations with the -illustrious deeds of the past, in which they may mirror our present -state, and foreshadow a continually progressing glorious future. For -there is a mysterious and marvellous 'one-ness' in the religious, -social, and artistic development of humanity which I have tried in the -pages of this book continually to point out. - -No civilised and wealthy country on the surface of our globe, can -boast of more heroic deeds on sea and land, in and out of Parliament; -of more splendid conquests by warlike and peaceful means than ours. -The Wars of the Roses, the colonisation of America, the occupation -of India, the peopling of Australia, the struggles of conformists -and non-conformists, of Cavaliers and Roundheads, of Churchmen and -Puritans, of Independents and Royalists, of Papists and Covenanters, -of Iconoclasts and Free-thinkers, all offer stirring scenes; and yet, -if we want to see on canvas pictures of our past, we must turn to -France or Germany for them. I am sorry to say that until lately the -Iconoclasts have borne all before them. As, however, the 'National -Association' has at length consented to allow the discussion of art, -and as words are in general precursors of deeds, we may expect some -results from our awakened interest in art-matters. - -3. 'What is the influence of academies upon the art of the nation?' - -_Answer._--Academies have no influence whatever, if the nation itself -takes no interest in art, and has no art-education from a general, -theoretical, and historical point of view. So long as art is considered -a mere luxury, because a house does not keep out cold and wet better, -if it be outwardly decorated; so long as it is thought that a parlour -need but have red curtains to be a parlour; that our walls may be -covered with any description of hideously-shaped, realistically-wrought -Chinese or Japanese flowers, if they are only kept in greenish or -brownish neutral tints; so long as we fancy that our wainscotings may -be bright light, though the paper above be dark; and that a window is -admirable, if only provided with a pointed arch, and some trefoil or -quatrefoil to keep out as much light as possible; academies can do -nothing. So long as we neglect higher esthetical culture and training -in our public schools, our academy will but reflect this neglect. -In reviewing the past I have throughout endeavoured to show the -close connection of art-forms with the general, social, religious, -intellectual, and moral conditions of the different nations and periods -in which they appeared. It is erroneous to suppose that art has only to -treat of straight or waving lines, of triangles, squares, and circles, -of imitations of flowers, animals, and men, of nature and nothing but -nature. The study of art comprises man in all his thoughts and actions, -and has to add to this the phenomena of the whole outer world, from -crystallisations to the heavenly vault, studded with innumerable stars -at night, or glowing with light and life in colours at day-time. If our -academy were to take this to heart, and expand its curriculum so as to -have the students taught the beauties of Greek, English, and German -poetry, we should not be obliged to turn to foreigners for worthy -illustrations of our immortal Shakespeare, Milton, or even Tennyson. -The art-historian knows that academies neither produced a Pheidias -nor a Praxiteles, neither a Raphael nor an Albert Duerer; neither a -Rubens nor a Holbein; neither a Gainsborough nor a Hogarth; neither a -Canova nor a Flaxman. For art-academies, as mere outgrowths of fashion, -unless rooted in the earnest, artistic spirit of a nation, only foster -mannerism, pander to the general bad taste of the wealthy classes, and -one-sidedly cultivate portrait-painting, whilst they shut out landscape -or historical figure-painting. Academies have rarely encouraged grand -ideas; they create a kind of parlour or bed-room art, with nice, but -very small, sentiments, water-colour effusions and flower imitations, -in which the Chinese surpass us by far. So long as our academy will -have great names on its programmes, as nominal lecturers, so called -because they do not lecture; so long as it will systematically neglect -to teach our rising artists Universal History, Art History, Archaeology, -Comparative Mythology, Symbolism, Iconography, Esthetics from a higher -scientific point, and Psychology with special reference to artistic -composition, and so long as these subjects are ignored in our general -educational establishments, we shall in vain try to compete at large -with other nations, however many isolated great artists we may produce. -Artists in all ages reflected in their products the general sentiments -of the times in which they lived, and of the people for whom they -worked; every page of this book bears out this assertion. Art is a -mighty civiliser of humanity and elevates the whole of our earthly -existence, for it purifies passions and pacifies our mind. Art is the -eternally-active genius of humanity. Let our academy acknowledge this, -and it will at least try to imitate the Art Training School at South -Kensington, which has continually worked in the direction of enlarging -the range of the studies of its students. - -4. 'What is the influence upon society of Decorative Art and -Art-workmanship in all household details?' - -_Answer._--If this question had been asked with an eye to business, -we might answer that decorative art makes trade brisk, induces people -to buy ornaments, and fills the pockets of dealers in curiosities. -But this is not our aim. So long as we fail to look upon art as an -earnest and serious study, as important and necessary to our social -wellbeing as either ethics or science, the influence of decorative art -must be confined to enticing people to plaster their walls with all -sorts of China plate, or pay dearly for Japanese trays, screens, or -cupboards, because they have not learnt to distinguish between the -quaint and the comical, the beautiful and the ugly. Their taste is -still on a level with that of untrained children, who have plenty of -money in their pockets, do not know what to buy, and rush to purchase -the ugliest monstrosities. If half the money that is wasted in these -directions were to be devoted to the encouragement of our hard-working -rising artists, we might soon boast of still greater successes than -we can proudly point to, despite the adverse circumstances under -which artists have to labour amongst us. Art with us is still looked -upon as an extravagance, a luxury, as it was with the Romans of -old, and this produces a craving for oddities. We hang up big china -cockatoos, or place big china dogs, or stags with big china antlers, -on our hearth-rugs. We have coarse china frogs and lizards, crabs or -lobsters, from which we eat our fruit or fish; or a life-like salmon -with staring eyes is brought on our table, its back takes off, and we -scoop out the real cooked salmon with which its inside is filled. Form -of dish, association of ideas, and action of the host are more worthy -of anthropophagi than civilised beings of the nineteenth century. So -long as art-history and esthetics are not made regular studies, not -only in art-schools but also in general educational establishments, -and especially ladies' schools, our national consciousness of art in -general and the requirements of our age in particular cannot improve. -Art is a branch of human knowledge, ingenuity, and creative force -in which ladies, trained to appreciate beauty, might be made better -'helps,' than in the kitchen, the pantry, or the larder. The national -wealth of France consists in the nation's superiority in taste and -artistic skill. The French arrange a few artificial flowers with -an exquisite understanding of the juxtaposition of colours and the -combination of forms, and make us pay for a 'bouquet' on a bonnet from -fifty to sixty francs, whilst the raw material costs from five to six -francs; they do the same in terra-cotta, bronze, or iron. So long as -everyone with us thinks himself justified in having his own bad taste -gratified, because he can pay for it, decorative artists will serve -that bad taste in all our household details. Art-history comprises -not merely measurements of temples, heights of spires in feet, or of -statues in cubits and inches. - -We have of late years made gigantic strides in the advancement -of street-architecture, though we do not yet know how to create -perspective views of artistic beauty; we still indulge too much in -mediaeval crookedness and unintelligible windings. We still decorate -too gaudily, or, falling into the other extreme, too much in neutral -colours; but we are beginning to understand that man does not live on -stone and brick alone, but also on taste in arranging and decorating -the stone. London, with the exception of some of our monstrous railway -bridges and railway stations, begins to look worthy of its position -as the centre of the world's commerce. Our streets have lately put -on some stately 'Sunday clothing' in terra-cotta, Portland cement, -and iron railings. Our glass and china, our furniture and carpets, -begin to have more variegated patterns, though I am sorry to hear that -foreigners are still generally appointed as the principal modellers. I -base this assertion on the Report on the National Competition of the -Works of Schools of Art for 1876, in which the examiners say: 'Our want -of that workman-like power over the material, which is so noticeable -in all French productions in modelling, is still very conspicuous. As -long as this continues a large proportion of the decorative figure or -ornamental designs in relief made for the English market will be in -the hands of foreign artists.' The panacea of this evil will and can -only be a higher intellectual training, not merely of the faculty of -imitating and combining given forms in nature, but of endowing them -with ideal beauty, fostered by a correct study of art-history. - -There are no illustrations to this work, but I have annexed a long -list of illustrated works on art. My aim in teaching, and writing, -has been consistently to induce my hearers and readers to think and -study for themselves. Bad or even good wood-cuts are by no means -essential in art-books, for we possess in the British, Christy's, -and South Kensington Museums such invaluable art-collections, that -we may write books without illustrations if we can induce readers -and students to verify what we say by a diligent study of these -specimens. Theoretical generalisation ought always to precede our -special studies. We only then know when we are able to systematise, to -group, to draw analogies, or to arrange our details according to some -general principle. If we enter on any study without having prepared -our mind to grasp the connecting links in an artistic or scientific -subject, our knowledge of an incoherent mass of details will only dwarf -our understanding, instead of brightening and clearing it, and we -shall become technically-trained machines, instead of self-conscious -and self-reasoning creators in any branch of art. The Art Library -at the South Kensington Museum is, without any exaggeration, the -completest in the world; it abounds in the best illustrated works of -all nations. Art-books with bad or indifferent illustrations, or even -with good illustrations, are not so much needed as art-books with -unbiased theories, esthetical principles, and philosophical ideas, -which may awaken the power of reasoning in both readers and students. -It is only too often the case that, in seeing bad illustrations, the -student imagines he knows everything about the work spoken of and -produced in outlines. He must, however, go and see for himself. Art -has its own fairy domain and its own most catholic realm, in which -everyone is welcome who can contribute to the improvement, delight, -and happiness of man. To induce readers and students to visit, with -some fore-thought and fore-knowledge, our vast and unparalleled -art-collections, and to convince them, that to detach the study of art -from a correct appreciation of the ideas that engendered its forms, is -an impossibility, was the task I set myself in writing the pages of -this book. - - LONDON: _October 1876_. - - - - -CONTENTS. - - - CHAPTER I. - - PROLEGOMENA. - PAGE - The phenomena of destruction and combination in Nature--The - difference between the sublime and beautiful--Without man - no beauty--Science, industry, and art--The utilitarian - principle--Choice--The realistic, historical, and critical - points of view in art--Crystallisations and their elements - --Symmetry and eurythmy--Proportion, action, and expression - --Man is the symbol of earthly perfection 1 - - - CHAPTER II. - - ETHNOLOGY IN ITS BEARING ON ART. - - The Negro, the Turanian, and the Aryan: their characteristics, - facial angle, amount of brain, and artistic capacities-- - Space and time--Art treated historically--Pottery in its - development--Generalisation and its advantage 22 - - - CHAPTER III. - - PRE-HISTORIC AND SAVAGE ART. - - Traces of man's inventive and decorative force in by-gone - ages--Classification of pre-historic products--The old - stone age--The new stone age--The bronze and iron ages-- - Man's first dwellings--Houses and temples--Lake-or - pile-dwellings in their gradual development--Cranoges - or wooden islands--Art in the western hemisphere--The - stucco in the rock-hewn temple at Mitla in Mexico-- - Difference between art-products in North, Central, and - South America--Cuzco, near Lake Titicaca--Pottery as a - reliable historical record--The wild and fantastic mode - of ornamentation in America, and its causes 32 - - - CHAPTER IV. - - CHINESE ART. - - The Chinese language--The holy books of the Chinese--The - sacred number five--Principle of ornamentation--Their - towns--The wall with the Chinese not yet a completing - part of the building--The enclosure, the frame, and - the substructure--The trellis-work of the Chinese and - its subdivision--Their Tshao-pings and Miaos--Mode of - colouring--Silk-weavings and their usual patterns-- - Feather works and embroideries--Their deficiencies in - painting--Their pottery--Causes of their failings in - art in a higher sense. 45 - - - CHAPTER V. - - INDIA, PERSIA, ASSYRIA, AND BABYLON. - - The Aryans on this and the other side of the Himalayan - Mountains--Science and art the offsprings of religion-- - Endeavours to express abstract phenomena in concrete - signs--The symbolic, dialectic, and mythological periods-- - The Indian trinity--The principal divinities of India, and - their analogy with the Egyptian, Persian, and Greek gods-- - Indian epic poetry--The rock-hewn temples and Buddha-- - Stucco ornamentation--Causes of the gorgeousness of - Indian art--Persia and the Persians--Their five cosmical - elements--Historical development--The Zend-Avesta-- - Persepolis and its oldest monuments--Zoroaster--The - Persian trinity--Light and darkness--Why no temples - were constructed--The Babylonians and Ninivites--Their - principles of ornamentation--Their wall decorations 60 - - - CHAPTER VI. - - EGYPTIAN ART. - - The sphinx the emblem of Egyptian art--Long and short - chronologists--Lepsius and his list of Egyptian dynasties-- - State of Egypt under Menes, who ruled 3892 B.C., according - to Lepsius--Division of Egyptian art into periods--The - forty-two holy books of the Egyptians--Their gods of the - first, second, and third orders--The Egyptian trinity--The - pyramidal period--The hieratic style--The Ptolemaic style - --Their mode of ornamentation and symmetrophobia 103 - - - CHAPTER VII. - - HEBREW ART. - - The Hebrews are a mixed race--Social and political condition - of the Jews during 6,000 years--Description of the country - and aspect of nature--Rabbi Manasseh Ben Israel-- - Architecture a sure measure of a nation's social and - political development--Egotistical character of nomadic - traders--The temple and palace of Solomon, the only - architectural efforts of the Jews--Sketch of their history, - divided into eight periods--The tabernacle a tent--The - first temple constructed on its plan--Ben David on the - mysterious empty room above the Holy of Holies--Causes why - the Jews had no art, and never attempted to have any 132 - - - CHAPTER VIII. - - GREEK ART. - - Meshiah (humanity) was first freed by the Greeks in form, - and by Christ in spirit--Aspect of nature--India, Egypt, - and Persia as the component parts of Greek development-- - The different dialects of the Greeks--Their mythology-- - Traces of intelligible facts and historical events in the - Greek myths--Zeus and his character--Prometheus and - Faust--The nine muses and their leader--Greek life a - continuous festivity--Greek poetry and philosophy--Greek - artistic development--The Olympian, Pythian, Nemaean, - and Isthmian games--Greek architecture: the temple-- - Building materials--Site of temples--Proportion--Plan - of temples--The Doric, Ionic, and Korinthian orders and - their subdivisions--The Attic style--Greek pottery and - Greek sculpture--Different periods--The British Museum - and Greek art--Onatas, Ageladas, Kalamis, Pheidias, - Praxiteles, Skopas, and Lysippus--The Parthenon-- - Aphrodite no longer draped--The groups of Niobe, Laokoon, - and the Farnese bull--Causes of the decline of Greek art 153 - - - CHAPTER IX. - - ETRUSKAN ART. - - The first settlers in Etruria--Their gods of the first and - second orders--The ritual of thunder--Temples and tombs-- - Subdivision of tombs--Cinerary chests--Excavations at - Praeneste--Pottery and metal works--Their style either - Archaic or Etruskan--Division of Etruskan works of art - into five principal categories 212 - - - CHAPTER X. - - ROMAN ART. - - Characteristic differences between Greeks and Romans--The - triple theocracy of Rome--The mythical period of the seven - kings of Rome--Rome as republic--Roman mythology--Rome - under the emperors--Roman public games--Roman literature - the outgrowth of Greek literature--Polylithic wall - decorations--The arch, cross-vault, and cupola--Periods of - Roman art and their subdivisions--Temples--Fora and - theatres--The mausoleum of Augustus--Hadrian, the divine - architect--Triumphal arches--The baths of Caracalla--The - advent of Christianity 228 - - - CHAPTER XI. - - EARLY CHRISTIAN ART. - - North and south of our globe--Buddhism and Christianity-- - Christ's divine teachings--Romanesque and Byzantine - art-forms--Symbols, allegories, emblems, and myths-- - Catacombs at Rome and Naples--The sacredness of the number - seven--Christian art in its essence and different phases-- - The spiritual element predominates--The first Christian - churches--Constantine--Ravenna and its early churches-- - St. Sophia in the Byzantine style--Migration of northern - nations--Their religious notions--The Teutons turn - Christians--Wood and ivory carvings--Art in its relation - to the progressive development of mankind--Summary and - conclusion 264 - - - BIBLIOGRAPHY for the study of the historical development of - Art 301 - - - INDEX 305 - - - - -MANUAL - -OF THE - -HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART - - - - -CHAPTER I. - -PROLEGOMENA. - - -Gazing at the heavens on a starry night, we see, in addition to -myriads of sparkling worlds floating in the air, a great quantity of -nebulae--either decayed systems of worlds, or worlds in formation. -Worlds which have lost their centre of gravity and fallen to pieces; or -worlds which are seeking, according to the general law of gravitation, -to form a central body by the attraction of cosmical ether. The one -phenomenon is that of destruction, the other that of new formation. - -This double process is continually repeating itself in the development -of art. Consciously or unconsciously, the artists of the different -nations, at different periods, devote themselves to the dissolution -or reconstruction of artistic products. To become acquainted with -this process, to trace the elements from which art is built up, or the -influences which engender a dissolution of artistic forms, is of the -greatest importance. - -Art must be looked upon as the phenomenal result of certain religious, -social, intellectual, and natural conditions. To trace these -conditions, their origin, influence, and gradual development, by means -of a critical and historical investigation into the causes which -produced them, will be our task. For art is like a mirror: whatever -looks into it is reflected by it. If a poor, untrained imagination -stares into it, no one must be astonished that poor and distorted -images result. - -It is usually accepted as a truism that the essence of art is the -reproduction of nature. Wherever, then, nature were reflected in -the 'Art-mirror,' we should have the best work of art. But this is -not so. For art has to reflect the phenomena of the makrokosm as -a subjectively-conceived mikrokosm. We do not see matters as they -really are, as each thing is surrounded by a thick fog of incidental, -objective, and subjective peculiarities. This fog must be cleared -away, to show us nature in the bright colours of intellectual and -self-conscious idealisation. - -Nature furnishes us with mortar and stones for the building, but the -architect's intellectual power has to arrange these elements, and to -bring them into an artistic shape. Nature furnishes us with flowers, -trees, animals and men; but the ornamental designer or painter has to -reproduce and to group them so as to impress the forms of nature with -an intellectual vitality. - -Before the artist proceeds to his work he must become thoroughly -conscious of the distinction between the SUBLIME and the BEAUTIFUL. -It is essential that he should draw a strict line of demarcation -between the two conceptions; in order not to waste his energies on the -reproduction of objects which are beyond the powers of art. - -During the long period of the cosmical formation of the earth, when -mountains were towered upon mountains, rocks upheaved, islands -submerged; when air, water, fire, and solid matter seemed engaged in -never-ending conflict--nature was _sublime_. The dynamic force appeared -to be the only element, and the counterbalancing static force was -without influence. Gradually vegetable and animal life, in their first -crude forms, commenced to show themselves. - -Zoophites were developed into megatheriums and mastodons. Mammoths -and elks sported on plains which now form the mountain tops of our -continents. Scarcely visible coral animals were still engaged in -constructing mountain chains, and a luxuriant vegetation covered the -small continents. Such transformations, convulsions, and changes are -gigantic, grand, awe-inspiring--sublime, but not beautiful. Whenever -nature is at work, disturbing the air with electric currents or shaking -huge mountains, so that they bow their lofty summits, or when the dry -soil is rent asunder, and sends forth streams of glowing lava, we -are in the presence of the sublime, not of the beautiful. Whenever -man's nature is overawed, whenever he is made to feel his impotence -by the phenomena of nature, he faces the sublime. In art, only a few -divinely-gifted and chosen geniuses have ever reached the sublime. - -When, however, the cosmical forces had expended their exuberant -powers--when a diversified climate had produced those plants and -animals that surround us--when man appeared on this revolving -planet, and by degrees reached self-consciousness as his highest -development--then only beauty acquired existence and dominion on earth. -Without men capable of understanding what is beautiful, art would have -no meaning. - -The aim of science is to vanquish error; the province of industry to -subdue matter, and the vocation of art to produce beauty. The artist -must not neglect science, for he has to be truthful, as error is ugly; -he must make himself well acquainted with matter, for he has to use, -to transform, and to modify it; and, finally, he has to hallow this -scientifically-treated matter by impressing it with the stamp of ideal -beauty. - -The attainment of this, the perfection of art, has been slow and -gradual. Though art, like all the inventions, took its origin in -want and necessity, the _utilitarian_ spirit is the very bane of -art, for art flourishes only under the influence of the very highest -intellectual culture. - -Nature produces like art; but the products of nature are the -unconscious effects of the immutable law of causation. The products of -art are the results of the conscious intellectual power of the artist. -It is the free, yet well-regulated, consciousness of the artist that -elevates his productions into works of art. Undoubtedly the great -store-house of the artist is nature; he learns from nature how to -ornament, but he has to discern, to combine, to adapt, to select, his -forms. The whole success of the artist, in whatever branch he works, -must depend on an earnest and severe use of the word CHOICE. - -'He is truly great who knows the value of everything, and distinguishes -what is more or less great, and what is most estimable, so as to -begin from that, and to apply the genius, and fix the desires upon -the execution of things worthy and great.' This mode of thinking was -followed by the most celebrated and enlightened artists from the -ancient Greeks to our own time. They knew to distinguish that which -was most worthy in nature, and to this they directed their study, -diligence, and industry. Inferior geniuses, because they are attached -to mediocrity, believe that a mere clinging to nature constitutes all -art; and the lowest artists are enchanted with the minutiae of little -works, taking them for principal things; so that human ignorance passes -from the trifling to the useless, from the useless to the ugly, and -from the ugly to the false and chimerical. - -In treating of the historical development of art, to enable artists -to distinguish and to choose the best, and not only to imitate but -to create consciously for themselves, it is necessary to make them -_theoretically_ acquainted with the progress of art. - -To trace historically the changes art had to undergo is necessary -for all really self-conscious artists. Art with us is still looked -upon as entirely subject to individual taste. Everyone thinks himself -competent to have an opinion on products of art. '_De gustibus non -est disputandum_' is heard not only in our drawing-rooms, but also in -art-circles. This false and utterly untenable adage is the cause of the -chaotic anarchy in our art-world. - -So little as there can be differences in truth, can there be -differences in beauty. It is the duty of philosophy to strive for -truth; it is the task of the theoretical artist to point out what is -beautiful. - -We may treat art from three different points of view:-- - -1. From a _realistic_ point of view, taking nature and geometry as its -basis. - -2. From an _historical_ point of view; showing by antiquarian and -archaeological researches its gradual development. - -3. From a _critical_ point of view; propounding abstract principles of -speculative philosophy and esthetics as applied to art. - - -A. - -The _realistic_ school has in later years had an immense influence -with us. Art-critics have almost gone so far as to demand from the -artist a correct rendering of the very stratification of rocks; or -of the different kinds of soil, to such a degree that the farmer -should be able to recognise the ground in which to sow oats or wheat. -Pictures, according to these estheticists, should be geological maps, -mineralogical collections, and, so far as flowers are concerned, -perfect herbariums. When this school takes up the archaeological -view, it clings with indomitable tenacity to given forms, and checks -imagination. Art is then only to be handled as the Greeks or Romans -practised it. Either the Gothic or the Renaissance style is to be -slavishly imitated. This school has one great drawback: it considers -all things natural beautiful, and looks upon an imitation of that which -_was_ as better than an exertion of the self-creative originality of -the artist. - - -B. - -The _historical_ school endeavours to bring before our eyes the past, -so as to enable us to understand the present, and to influence the -future of art. This school has followed two divergent directions, the -Antique and the Gothic, the classical or romantic; the one holding that -everything beautiful must be based upon Greek patterns; the other that -all beauty is confined to the Gothic. The writers of these two schools -bewilder the students; either driving them into a cold, soulless -imitation of classic forms, or forcing them to sacrifice everything to -trefoils, pinnacles, tracery, finials, buttresses, thin spires, painted -windows, and pointed arches. - - -C. - -The _critical_ school indulges in tall phrases, mere hypothetical -paradoxes, often startling the world with speculations of the wildest -sort. Art-critics frequently roam in the spheres of surmises; they have -their good points, but often neglect reality, or the historical ground; -they sacrifice everything to the idea, which is with them the only -productive basis of everything existing in art. - -We shall try to be realistic, as it would be vain to attempt to detach -art from the influences of nature; for art borrows its principal -elements from the impressions of natural phenomena. We shall be -historical, and point out the progressive development of art; and, -lastly, we shall endeavour to be critical. Speculative philosophy has -its merits in art. Esthetical criticism suggests new ideas, and new -ideas engender new forms. We shall endeavour to adopt from each of the -three schools what is best. Our age is an age of eclecticism in art. We -must, however, try to prepare for a period of original vitality, which -can only be done by avoiding one-sidedness and heedless originality. -We shall try to suggest and to excite in our readers new thoughts. As -music speaks in sounds, poetry in words, so art in forms; but music, -poetry, and art are subject to certain rules, without which harmony -would become dissonance, poetry an inflated prose, and art a tasteless -entity, of which quaintness will be the only distinguishing attribute. -What we call our sense of beauty is based on those laws which make the -existence of the universe possible. - -The Greeks used for beauty in art the same word, as for order, or the -perfect arrangement of the universe. The word {kosmos} (from which -we have 'cosmetic,' any beautifying application) may teach us how we -should look upon works of art, which ought to be a reflection of the -general laws ruling nature. - -Two forces guide our material and intellectual life. We possess -two means of acquiring knowledge and of practising art: reason and -experience. Impressions from without are the everlasting source of all -our conceptions. Hunger and thirst drive us to seek nourishment, to -become fishers, hunters, herdsmen, or agriculturists. Cold and heat -force us to seek a shelter, to construct wigwams, huts, dwellings on -piles, cottages, houses, palaces, and temples. - -Though order and harmony prevail in the outer world, every atom of -the universe is endowed with an unconscious will or life of its own. -Atoms seek atoms according to inherent laws, or fly from or annihilate -one another. The whole process of life around us appears to be one -never-ending struggle. Apparently there rules only the law of chance -and might; what cannot conquer is conquered. - -History is one long catalogue of appearing and disappearing nations, of -devouring and devoured kingdoms and empires. It is as though generation -after generation had emerged from the spectral past into the sanguinary -present, to destroy or to be destroyed. This conflict in the outer -world is seconded by everlasting conflicts in our inner world. Fear, -hope, love--passions of all kinds, imagination and reality, ignorance -and knowledge, pride and humility, prejudice and wisdom, form an -intellectual hurricane not less destructive than the warfare of the -cosmical elements. Religion, Science, and Art, this divine triad, -step in. Religion excites in us the hope of higher and better morals; -science creates consciousness of the laws according to which we are -governed; the link between cause and effect is traced, and the rule of -arbitrary chance narrowed. Lastly, art throws its beautifying halo on -everything. Thus these three are instrumental in elevating our mind, -expanding our intellectual powers, and bringing harmony and beauty into -the eternal conflict. Faith is the element of religion, experience the -element of knowledge, and beauty the element of art. Whilst faith and -experience are possible without an artistic elevation of the mind, art -must combine the elements of religion and science, and form through -beauty a visible link between these elements. - -The sublime, as we have said, rules in the universe. Clouds chase one -another and are subject to everlasting changes. Trees cover the surface -of our globe, forming woods at random. Mountains are towered up, as if -hurled together by chance. Seas form a bewildering variety of coasts. -Streams wind their paths through mountains and valleys with capricious -irregularity. All these phenomena confuse and oppress us, they engender -an incomprehensible, indistinct feeling in us. But so soon as we begin -with our intellectual force to sift, to separate, and to detach single -phenomena from the general mass--as soon as _choice_ begins to work, -the isolated phenomenon displays at once its symmetrical beauty. - -[Illustration: (Snowflakes)] - -This is the case with crystallisations, the _first_ artistic products -of unconscious nature. If we look at a vast plain covered with snow, -a feeling of sublime cold and wretchedness overcomes us; but if we -take up one isolated snow-flake, and place it under a microscope, we -find that the elements of the crystallised drop of water surround -with harmonious regularity a common centre, which is the body, -from which radiate as integral parts the diversified forms of the -flake. In studying snow-flakes, we find that the three dimensions of -space--height, breadth, and depth, limited by symmetry, proportion and -direction--are the principal elements of every form which in itself has -to represent a detached total. In all the crystallisations there is one -'momentum' of formation--the centre, from which all the parts emanate -perfectly well-balanced and complete in themselves. The elements -of which all artistic works, whether natural or produced by men, -are composed, are the straight line and the waving line. With these -elements we can obtain the three principal conditions of every work of -art--symmetry, proportion, and direction. Snow-flakes may be used in -any direction, and therefore they may be set down as without distinct -direction. The rays with their radiation, however, are formed according -to the principal law of the universe. They represent the _dynamic_ -force; they strive at isolation from the centre which must be looked -upon as their _static_ momentum. Thus in the first artistic products of -nature positive and negative, or rather dynamic and static forces are -clearly perceptible. The horizontal line is the representative of the -static, whilst the vertical line is the indicator of the dynamic force. - -SYMMETRY _is a perfect equality of form to the right and left of a -vertical line on a horizontal base_. - -EURYTHMY _consists in a repetition of variegated forms_. - -In order to produce eurythmy we must confine symmetry within a certain -compass; for this purpose we have the _frame_. Our doors are nothing -but frames for the entering or departing individuals; as our windows -are frames for the landscape, sky, or walls on which we look, or for -ourselves when seen from without. The frame, whether it be real or -imaginary, as the correct limitation of forms, is of the very highest -importance in decorative and pictorial art. - -Eurythmy may be alternating. This alternating principle is observed in -metopes and triglyphs. The alternation may be interrupted by a caesura -(a mark or sign of rest). Masks, heads of lions, or any other figures -may form the caesura, as decorative elements in the long lines of the -tops of houses, palaces, or temples. The caesura, combined with eurythmy -and symmetry, will give us the best patterns for flat decorations, as -in carpets, paper-hangings, keramic works and metal or wood ornaments. - -Applying what we have said of crystallisations to plants and animals, -we find that symmetry is undoubtedly the predominant element in every -flower. The plant developes itself from the ground, which is its -horizontal basis. It shoots up generally in a vertical direction, as a -radiation from our globe. In trees the branches, leaves, flowers, and -fruits are clustered around a central line in eurythmical proportion. -In flowers symmetry predominates, whilst in trees eurythmy prevails. In -considering the branches of a tree in relation to its trunk, we find -the same symmetry and eurythmy, though the direction be changed. We can -study these forms best in plants of the coal formation--the Sigillaria, -Stigmaria, Lepidodendra, and Calamites; and in ferns, fir-trees, -cedars, &c. - -In the palm tree we see most distinctly the working of the conflicting -forces of nature. The dynamic force of vitality drives the stem -upwards, and the static force of gravitation towards a common centre is -expressed in the beautifully-drooping curves of the leaves. Symmetry is -further to be observed in the lowest animals, in polyps, radiata, &c., -but never in higher species, in which it is not planimetrical (viz., -cannot be treated on a plane) but linear, none of them being perfectly -regular in any of the three dimensions of space. - -Man is altogether different from the products of the mineral or -vegetable kingdoms, which give us the prototypes of conventional art. -Man is not in all directions symmetrical in the strict sense of the -word. He has not two heads, two noses, or two mouths. The component -elements in man are different. His very nature revolts against a -planimetrical treatment. This was perfectly understood by the masters -of arabesque, who have always turned man half into a fish, a plant, -a serpent, a tendril, or some other form adapted for planimetrical -treatment. Eurythmy and _Proportion_ are the elements of higher organic -forms--to which must be added direction or _Action_, and finally -_Expression_. - -In most of the lower animals the vertebrae are horizontal, and -coincident with the moving direction of the whole creature. In man, on -the other hand, the vertebrae are vertical, in opposition to the moving -direction which is horizontal; so that the vertebrae and line of motion -are at right angles. - -In men, detached as they are from their horizontal basis, the -soil--carrying their static force with them, and able to change it -either from below, upwards, or from front to back--_direction_ is of -a complicated nature, and must be well studied, so as not to produce -incongruities. - -If a woman or man were painted with the most beautiful and expressive -face, but having it twisted round, so as to crown the spine, we should -turn from it with disgust, as anyone endowed with the sense of beauty -turns from acrobats, because the natural laws of gravitation and -symmetry would be violated. This illustration may serve to prove, that -there are laws in art with which we must make ourselves acquainted, -and that the mere 'right of taste,' in the general sense of the words, -cannot promote the understanding and appreciation of our artistic -productions. - -Next to direction we have to take into account _motion_. This element -is in animals and men produced by their inherent dynamic force, -counteracted by the body itself, which represents the static force, or -the '_vis inertiae_,' chaining them to the centre of gravitation in the -earth. - -Motion again leads to _expression_ and _action_. - -_Expression_ is the effect of the conflicting static or dynamic -(passive or active) state of the mind, so far as this state is revealed -in the lineaments of the face. - -_Action_ is the effect of the same conflicting force so far as it is -expressed in the limbs and the position of the body. - -A third force, which is often used unconsciously, necessarily grows out -of these elements--the controlling or ruling element, or, as Vitruvius -has it, '_the principle of authority_.' This element points out the -preponderance of certain forms as the visible representatives of the -general principles which we have stated, bringing into the _variety_ -of details, harmony and _unity_. This controlling element stands to -the surrounding and united parts in the same relation as the key-note -to a harmonious melody. Without that key-note no harmony--without the -controlling element no beauty, were possible. - -Having proceeded step by step from the formation of matter in crystals -to man, we may set down the following as the five principal elements -necessary to beauty in art:-- - - 1. Symmetry. - 2. Eurythmy. - 3. Proportion. - 4. Direction or motion. - 5. Expression. - -a. Symmetry has already been amply treated. - -b. Eurythmy is either stereometric or planimetric. It is stereometric -in balls and in regular solid bodies, such as the tetrahedron, a figure -of four equal triangular faces, or the polyhedron, a figure with many -sides. These forms are symmetrical without any controlling element. -Such an element shows itself first in the ellipsoid--distinct from the -oval--in the prism, and the pyramid. Planimetric eurythmy preponderates -in snow-crystals, flowers, plants, trees, and the lowest animals. - -The controlling element shows itself in the grouping of the single -parts round a common centre, which is often distinguished by a contrast -in forms or colours. It is unconsciously expressed by a sign or mark. - -Ornamentation takes its origin in the effort to express, to designate, -or to mark out the controlling element. The ornamented object has -only then a meaning, when it expresses visibly the hidden idea of the -controlling element, say the idea of fastening or keeping together, -as in clasps, brooches, buckles; or the idea of equilibrium, as in -earrings. Such signs or marks were very early used, and are spread -all over our globe; they developed into the rough tombs in Phrygia, -Greece and Italy; took a higher form in Central America and Assyria; -became crystallised in the Pyramids; and attained the highest -perfection in the tombs of Mausolus, Augustus, and Hadrian. The mark -or sign is also used in games, as on race-courses, in the stadium, -the circus, or the amphitheatre. A more distinct expression is gained -when the mark or sign, as divine statue, altar, &c., is surrounded by -rhythmically-arranged circles or encompassing walls, as the visible -expression of the union of the many, or variety, for one religious -or ceremonial purpose. The mark or sign reflects, on the one hand, -the idea of harmony, whilst, on the other, the rhythmically-arranged -surroundings form an impressive total, heightening the force of the -controlling element. This law explains the awe, veneration, mysterious -feeling, and secret fear with which men at all times have looked upon -the central mark or sign, whether in the simple stone-circles of Abury, -Stonehenge, and Carnac, the rock-hewn temples of India, the temples -of Egypt, Greece, and Rome, or the synagogues and churches of our own -times. - -Next to the controlling element, we must take into consideration -the grouping of the whole object on a horizontal basis around a -vertical axis. This axis becomes the seat of the linear, symmetrical, -controlling element. It is especially marked by richly ornamented -reliefs or by gaudier colours, so pronounced that the other parts of -the ornamented object appear as mere accompaniments of the horizontal -and vertical lines. Remarkable in their incongruity, but often -unsurpassed in the application of this principle, are the tattooed -heads of savages, in which the linear central line is ornamented -symmetrically on both sides of the face--the prominent parts being -marked by spirals to make them appear still more prominent. - -c. Proportion, as an element of art, cannot work by itself, but must -be considered in relation to its parts and the controlling element. -Proportion consists of a basis, a middle piece, and a dominant. To -illustrate this, we have in plants and trees, the root (basis), the -stem or trunk (middle piece), and the top, crown or flower (dominant). - -The basis represents the cosmical element of gravitation by powerful -masses, simplicity of forms, and dark colouring. This law was -especially observed in the excellent decoration of the Roman houses -at Pompeii, and is still followed in our wainscoting. We try -unconsciously to express the static force from which the dynamic rises. - -The middle piece, growing out of the basis, is supported and -supporting; it unites the elements of the basis with the top or -dominant; it is the connecting link between these two extremes. The -basis stands in the same relation to the middle piece, as the latter to -the dominant. - -The dominant harmoniously reconciles the conflicting forces of striving -upwards, and being drawn downwards. Variations in these relations are -not only allowable, but form the very element of the artist's creative -originality--so long as he clearly marks the purpose of the three -elements. - -d. Direction, or motion, in its highest form is only to be found in -man. In fishes the axis, or seat of the controlling element, is not -fixed as in plants. If fishes pursue some point of attraction, they -shoot forward in a straight line, so that a conflict between the static -and dynamic forces is never visible in them, because the axes of these -two forces are always one and the same. This is entirely different with -birds, quadrupeds, and especially with men, who, to a great extent, are -masters of their motions; for will, as the force of their conscious -intellect, changes their static as well as their dynamic direction. - -Man is the symbol of earthly perfection. In him all laws and elements -of the universe are united. What is with inanimate nature a static -point of attraction, is with man _moral_; the dynamic force of -activity, is with him _intellect_. Animals also work, but their works -are in general the result of their instinct; whilst with man, though he -may also be ruled by unconscious impulses, intellect--self-conscious -intellect--is the mainspring of all his actions. These have a -reflecting mirror in the glance of his eyes, whilst the changing -and changeable effects of scorn, love, wrath, delight, happiness, -or despair are pictured in the mysteriously-woven lineaments of his -countenance. - -e. Expression, of intellectual and moral impressions, is most -concentrated in MAN. - - - - -CHAPTER II. - -ETHNOLOGY IN ITS BEARING ON ART. - - -Man is placed on this globe as a radius,--a detached radius. The -axis of his body is part of the diameter of the earth, and divides -him into symmetrical halves. A line, that passes at an equal -distance through the double organs, also divides the single ones -into two equally-arranged portions. We possess two eyes, to receive -the impression of light; two ears, to be touched simultaneously by -the waves of sound; two tubes are opened, to receive the refined, -imponderable bodies producing odour; the lips are grouped round a -marked central line to the chin. We have two shoulders, two arms, -two hands, two legs, two feet; both hands have the same number of -fingers, and both feet the same number of toes. On the other hand, the -parts, taken by themselves, break through all the laws of symmetrical -uniformity. The arms are longer than the trunk; the legs are longer -than the arms; hands end in unequally-subdivided fingers; feet in -similarly-treated toes. But notwithstanding this want of symmetry there -is perfect harmony in the relations of the parts to the whole, so that -man may be said to be the very master-piece of creation. In considering -the controlling linear elements, in the three grand groups into which -humanity may be best divided for a comprehensive study of art, we find -that the very fundamental facial lines differ. - - -I. - -We have first the Negro, the fossil, the _black_, or antediluvian man. -The eyes, nostrils, and lips are drawn downwards in melancholy lines. -He is cross-toothed (_prognathous_), triangular-headed, has flat feet, -long heels, an imperfect pelvis, but a very powerful digestive organ, -and a correspondingly enormous mouth. - -[Illustration] - -The Oceanic Negro is the best example of this group. He is slow of -temperament, unskilled, his mechanical ingenuity being that of a child; -he never goes beyond geometrical ornamentation; builds tumuli or -triangular wigwams; lives on what he finds by chance, and, at the best, -hunts or fishes. His reasoning faculty is very limited, his imagination -slow, but his perceptive faculties (the senses) are highly developed. -He is altogether incapable of rising from a fact to a principle. He -cannot create beauty, for he is indifferent to any ideal conception. -He possesses only from 75-83-1/2 cubic inches of brain, his facial angle -being about 85-1/2 degrees. This lowest group of mankind branches off into -different types. The general features of the group have neither changed -nor improved. The Negro is still the woolly-headed, animal-faced being, -represented on the tombs of the Pharaohs, because his bodily structure, -his facial lines have not altered during thousands of years. In -studying the artistic products, the customs and manners of this group, -we can picture to ourselves the state in which Asiatics and Europeans -must have lived during the oldest stone period. The Negroes use the -same kind of flint instruments, manufacture the same crude kind of -pottery, adorn their clubs, paddles, and the cross-beams of their huts -with the same rope and serpent-like entangled windings and twistings, -that are found in various parts of the globe of pre-historic times. The -ruling lines of the face and head of the Negro are reflected in his -triangular or mound-like architectural constructions. - - -II. - -[Illustration] - -Next we have the Turanian (from _tura_, 'swiftness of a horse'), -the Mongol, the square or short-headed (_brachikephalous_), the -traditionary, the _yellow_ man. His face is flat, his nose deeply -sunken between his prominent cheeks; his reasoning faculty is -developed only to a certain degree. He has small, oblique eyes, the -lines being turned upwards, expressing cunning and jocularity. His -mouth is less powerful than that of the negro. He has broad shoulders, -an expansive chest, thin and small bow legs, as if formed to use those -of horses instead of his own; he is an excellent rider, but a slow -though steady walker. He looks on nature with a nomadic shepherd's eye, -and not with that of a settled artist. He excels in technical ability, -has great powers of imitation, can produce geometrical ornamentation -of the most complicated and ingenious character, and a realistic -imitation of flowers, butterflies, and birds, but has no sense for -perspective and no talent for shading. He is incapable of drawing the -human form. Sculpture of a higher kind is unknown to him, though he can -execute perfectly marvellous carvings, which, though quaint in design -and composition, are wanting in proportion and expression. Faithful -to his nomadic traditions, and the lines of his head and face, his -architectural constructions take an according form. Like his facial -lines, the roofs of his houses are twisted upwards. - -The amount of brain in the Turanian averages 83-1/2 cubic inches, and -his facial angle is 87-1/2 degrees. - - -III. - -[Illustration] - -Finally we have the Aryan, the long or oval-headed man -(_dolichokephalous_), the historical, the _white_ man, the crowning -product of the cosmical forces of nature. His facial lines are composed -of the two conflicting elements, the horizontal and the vertical line, -and are framed in by an oval. His amount of brain is on an average 92 -cubic inches, and his facial angle 90 degrees. His development is not -limited. This group of mankind, though divided into many different -types (races or nations), which have arisen from an intermixture with -the other two groups, or through the influences of climate, food, and -the aspect of nature, stands at the highest point of civilisation. As -the lines of his face are admirably counterbalanced, and his body is a -master-piece of regularity and proportion, he has tried to establish -a perfect balance between the conflicting forces in his moral and -intellectual nature. To him exclusively we owe art in its highest -sense. Once he stood on the same level with the primitive black savage, -then he advanced to the ingenuity of the yellow man, and left both -far behind him in his gradual but always progressive development. He -surpasses the other two groups of humanity, not only in technical -skill, but especially in inventive and reasoning power, critical -discernment, and purity of artistic taste. The white man alone, has -produced idealised master-pieces in sculpture and painting. - -The white man in his architecture uses either the horizontal or the -vertical line, or both; he takes the triangular building of the negro -and places it on the square tent of the yellow man, making his house -as perfect as possible; he goes further, and, in accordance with -his powerfully-arched brow, over-arches not only rivers and chasms, -but builds his magnificent cupolas and pointed arches, the acme of -architectural forms. - -Ethnology then serves us as a foundation for the study of art in its -different phases. - -Conforming to the general tendency of modern science, we have tried to -express the cause of the artistic development of the three groups of -humanity by figures; we have measured the seat and instrument of our -intellectual faculty, and have thus tried to leave the sphere of mere -conjecture, or unfounded opinion, in order to place the phenomena of -art-history on a firm basis. Though art, undoubtedly, belongs 'to the -magic circle of the imagination, and the inner powers of the mind,' -those powers are dependent on our very bodily construction, the amount -of brain and the facial angle. We do not deal in mere hypothesis, but -submit to our readers a complete theory borne out by facts. - -In considering the frontispiece of our manual, representing the 'TREE -OF ART,' we can visibly trace the slow and gradual development of the -white man. The negro fixes our attention only as savage; the yellow -man has a line of his own, and has remained stationary in his artistic -development; the white man has passed through the savage stages, and -by his own exertions, undergoing various phases of rise and decline -(the real signs of historical vitality), has steadily progressed till -he began to attempt, and to succeed in bringing about, 'a harmonious -connection between the representation of nature and the expression of -awakened emotion, and a mysterious analogy between the emotions of his -mind and the phenomena perceived by his senses.' - -As all phenomena must take place in _space_ and _time_ (the two -fundamental forms of all existence), the products of art must also have -been executed under these two conditions, and can therefore be treated -_historically_. - -Space is the expansion and extension of the forces of nature into the -infinite. Time is the limitation of this activity. Without space no -object could arrive at completion. Without time the subject would be -eternal. These are the two counteracting elements. The one, space, -is positive--the other, time, negative. Time is either relative or -absolute. If relative, it can be measured by an ascertained succession -of events. If absolute, it becomes measurable by years. In both we -can trace a gradual and successive development of artistic forms. -In general, time relative, with its succession of products, is more -reliable than time labelled with voluntary and more than doubtful -dates. For instance, we cannot measure the periods of the formation -of the earth's crust by years, and still we are perfectly convinced -that the _tertiary_ formation could not have taken place before the -_primary_; thus we are justified in assuming that the iron period must -have succeeded the stone or bronze period; bronze instruments never -being found with iron handles, whilst iron blades have ornamented -wooden or bronze handles. Man naturally scarcely ever uses the worse -material for a practical purpose when he has once found a better one; -but he will use the softer material as a means of ornamentation. - -That we have plenty of 'survivals' in art, as well as in nature, -does not in any way militate against the strict logic of facts. The -lowest forms of animals have mostly survived (like the lowest forms -of ornamentation), yet no one can doubt or deny the gradual and -systematic development of the vegetable and animal kingdoms. If we find -no fragments of pottery in Australia, New Zealand, or the Polynesian -islands, we cannot assume that a grand and powerful civilisation has -perished there, leaving no traces behind. In finding different kinds of -pottery, gradually improving even in the quality of the material--the -clay being first unwashed, then mixed with grains of quartz and -felspar, next carefully washed, then sun-baked, then fire-baked; -first hand and then wheel turned, and at last glazed, unornamented -or ornamented--we cannot assume that the order was inverted, and -that man first ornamented glazed pottery, which he turned out on the -wheel, and then went back to unwashed clay and hand-made pottery. The -'degeneration theory' has exploded as entirely as the geocentric and -anthropocentric theories have vanished. We know that man, like flowers, -trees, rocks and animals, is the product of the combined forces of -nature and the influences of climate and food, and that his religious, -social, and political conditions are closely reflected in his art. As -little as our globe is the centre of the universe, or man the centre of -creation, so little did art or science spring at once perfectly armed, -provided with spear and shield, from Jupiter's head like blue-eyed -Athene. In a certain sense art and science are both of divine origin, -but only so far as the originating and creative power is concerned, -which, once set in motion, had to grow and to develop according to -definite and immutable laws. To trace this development step by step in -general outlines, from time relative to the mythical and traditional -periods, and thence to the age of history, is the aim of our manual. In -generalising thus, and separating the special from the universal, we -are enabled to embrace at once with greater clearness a wider range of -knowledge, and to give to the treatment of art-history a more elevated -and useful character. By a suppression of details, the great periods -and features of a common development are rendered more intelligible, -and our reasoning faculty is enabled to grasp that which might -otherwise escape our limited powers of comprehension. - - - - -CHAPTER III. - -PRE-HISTORIC AND SAVAGE ART. - - -Art, like nature, is its own interpreter. A well-finished pattern has -not preceded a more simple one; circular ornamentations are of a later -date than ornamentations with straight lines. The cave-habitation -must have been in use before the construction of independent temples. -Art must have had a beginning like language; for it is a language--a -language in forms, speaking to our eyes. If what the Arabs say is true, -that the best description is that in which the ear is transformed into -an eye, the best picture will be one that transforms our eyes into -ears. Art speaks through light, as language through sounds. We have -tried to discover by means of philology--which in modern times has -become a science--a more or less close relationship between idioms and -idioms; in the same way we try to trace some general primitive types -from which we may deduce the innumerable works of art. - -In times long by-gone we find traces of man's inventive and decorative -force. The products of that force even in pre-historic ages widely -differ in their degrees of workmanship. There are more or less finished -hatchets, chisels, knives, arrow-heads, paal-stabs, celts and armlets. -The ornamentation, from mere varying straight lines, goes over into -spiral forms of different direction and combination. We have therefore -no difficulty in classifying the products of pre-historic art in the -following way:-- - - _a._ The Palaeolithic, or old stone age. - _b._ The Neolithic, or new stone age. - _c._ The Bronze age, and - _d._ The Iron age. - -The first two subdivisions belong to savage life, the third to the -mythical or traditionary, and the fourth to the historical periods. - -During the old stone age we have scarcely any traces of ornamentation; -during the new stone age we find some attempts at geometrical lines, -and some sketches of animals on ivory blades; during the bronze age we -have winding and twisting patterns of excellent geometrical design; -and, finally, during the iron age, animals and even human forms are -used as means of ornamentation. - -During the pre-historic period of man's artistic development we find a -peculiar similarity between his dwellings and his tombs. The mountain -cavern, and the hut constructed of beams and boughs, covered with -skins, were undoubtedly men's first stately palaces. The very oldest -traditions bear out this statement. The earliest inhabitants of -Greece dwelt in mountain caverns. The people of Siberia, anterior to -the Samoyedes, lived, according to Erman, in subterranean caves. The -Kyklops of Homer are but nomads, residing in mountain caverns. Of the -Hittites, a tribe in Canaan in the times of Abraham, it is recorded -that they buried their dead in caves. But it is an incontestable fact -that the burial-places resembled the dwellings of the pre-historic -man. Crypts, catacombs, and rock-hewn temples may be set down as -having originated from man's first mountain home. The tombs of the -Tartars in Kasan resemble their houses on a small scale. A Circassian -tomb resembles a Circassian cottage. The tombs of the Karaite Jews in -the valley of Jehoshaphat, are like their houses. Laplanders live in -caves. The aborigines of Germany and France, the contemporaries of the -mammoth, rhinoceros, auerochs and elk, dwelt in caves, as their bones -are found mingled with those of these now extinct animals, together -with various implements, such as adzes, flint arrows, stone knives, and -even, as in the cave at Perigord on the borders of the Dordogne, works -of art of great artistic power. Jordanes, in his 'De Rebus Geticis,' -mentions people in Sweden (Scania) living like wild animals in caves, -cut out in the rocks. But the nomad savage could find such dwellings -only where there were mountains. If he wandered out of such a district -into the plains, and wanted to shelter himself from the inclemency of -the weather, he had to collect blocks of stone, and to form with them -artificial caves. In this manner cromlechs, Dos, Dyss or dolmens, and -gallery chambers arose, in which the long, narrow gallery corresponds -to the confined entrance of the mountain-cave, and the chamber to the -cavern. - -By degrees man began to construct detached houses for himself, and -at last temples for his god or gods. No traces of temples are found -in pre-historic times, except in the Western hemisphere. The Stiens -of Cambodia, in the central parts of Cochin-China, have no temples. -From the southern promontory of Africa to far beyond the banks of the -Zambesi no temples are found. The pastoral and agricultural people -of Madagascar have no temples, though they have huts and houses, -ornamented pottery, and are to a certain degree acquainted with -textile art. Before man constructs a temple he constructs a house, -to protect himself, his herds, and family from wild animals, but -above all from his still more dreaded fellow-creature, in whom he -sees a dangerous rival. This propensity serves to explain the origin -of lake-dwellings--the most ancient proofs of man's constructing -capacity, and of his talent to unite for a certain purpose, and to -enclose a given space. Herodotus already tells us of a settlement on -Lake Prasias, the modern Tachyno (in Rumelia, European Turkey), where -men lived on platforms, supported by tall piles. Abulfeda, the Syrian -geographer (b. 1273; d. 1313), speaks of Christian fishermen living in -wooden huts, built on piles in one of the Apamean lakes on the Orontes -(in Asia). The Papuans of New Guinea still live in such pile-dwellings, -the floors of which are supported by rudely-carved human figures, an -attempt at telamons. These are 'survivals,' but the lake-dwellings in -Italy and Switzerland belong to pre-historic times. In tracing their -different modes of construction, we find three periods of a progressive -architectural development recorded. - -We have pile-dwellings of the most primitive construction. Rough piles -were used, pointed with the aid of fire or with stone hatchets, later -with bronze, and finally with iron tools. They were placed either close -together or in pairs, or wide apart--generally in regular order. The -heads of the piles were brought to a level above the water to receive -the beams of the platform, which were fastened down with wooden pins. -Later, as an improvement, mortices were cut in the tops of the vertical -piles to receive the cross-beams. - -Other constructions, especially those near Nidau (niedere Au, lower -meadow), are built on a foundation artificially strengthened with -stones, which is, undoubtedly, an improvement on the former method. - -Experience taught the pre-historic architects that the piles were -not quite safe, and ought to have some support against the turbulent -risings of the lake. This produced the still more improved fascine -constructions, which certainly gave still greater strength to the -dwelling. The platform did not rest on mere piles but on artificial -foundations, built up from the bottom with horizontal layers of sticks -or small branches of trees, the vertical piles serving as connecting -links to the whole construction. - -Cranoges, or wooden islands, are chiefly found in Ireland and Scotland. -They differ from the fascine constructions in that they frequently were -built on natural islands, or on shallows approaching to this character. -The huts built upon these pile-constructions were rectangular; some may -have been round, like the huts of savages, in imitation of mole-hills, -the prototypes of the numerous mounds strewn all over the globe. The -huts contained an artificial hearth, made of three or four slabs of -stone. - -That the inhabitants of the lake-dwellings were acquainted with -textile art, is proved by the discovery of an innumerable quantity of -clay-weights for weaving purposes, and by pieces of burnt woven flax. -The crude pottery, tools and wooden pegs, fibres twisted into ropes, -remains of different cereals, fruits, and domestic animals found in -these settlements, clearly prove that a certain kind of family life -must have existed. At all events, the inhabitants must have reached a -higher degree of civilisation than some of the South-Sea Islanders of -our century, who, on receiving some iron nails, planted them, in the -expectation of reaping a rich crop of this valuable vegetable. - -We see that in pre-historic times art was already practised, not only -for a merely utilitarian but also for an ornamental and artistic -purpose. - -This may be said, in a much higher sense, of the pre-historic -art-remains in the Western hemisphere. Art had there a threefold -development, corresponding to the three groups of humanity. We find the -mounds of the Negro; the pottery of the yellow man, with its quaint -ornamentation; and the remarkable temples, fortresses, viaducts, and -aqueducts of the Aryan group. We possess in our museums abundant -specimens of the works of these three groups, as also of their singular -hieroglyphic writings, resembling the first attempts of the Chinese -and Egyptians to represent ideas in forms. Imagination with savages -supplies the form; the mere outlines therefore suffice. The horse drawn -in this way (_a_) is a real horse; (_b_) this forms a real goose; (_c_) -this is the sun; and (_d_) this a real man. It is a kind of pictorial -writing or ideography, to be seen for miles and miles hewn in rocks at -Massaya, and practised by humanity at large, as by our own children, in -the first stage of awakening consciousness. - -[Illustration] - -We find not only ethnological, but also philological and artistic -traces of the fact, that at an unknown pre-historic period, the Western -hemisphere must have been in close connection with the Eastern. The -name of the supreme Divinity, Dyaus, {Theos}, Deus, is in the far West -_Teotl_. - -Art in the _North_ of the Western hemisphere is primitive, kyklopean -walls and sepulchral mounds being the principal remains. - -In the _Centre_ of the Continent, art bears all the traces of a -gradually-developed progress. It almost reached the forms of Egypt, -but stopped half way. By some means Atalanta was separated from the -East, and the pyramids, temples and palaces of central America remained -in the same relation to the pyramids, temples and palaces of Egypt as -the _tapir_ to the elephant; the _alligator_ to the crocodile; and the -_llama_ to the camel. - -The West possessed a knowledge of astronomy analogous to that of the -Chinese, and their mode of ornamentation in excellent stucco reached -a high degree of technical and even pictorial skill. They went so far -as to represent scenes of an historical character with some degree -of dramatic power; as the stucco of the rock-hewn temple of Mitla in -Mexico proves. Their ornamentation is irregular and confused, like -their wild vegetation, in which creepers predominate. - -Some figures are striking in their resemblance to Egyptian forms. - -A sculptured divinity of granite, 3-1/2 feet high, found near a -finely-built pyramid not far from Guatusco or Huatusco, is excellently -worked and finished in a simple style. Still more curious is a small -statue executed in lava, with a head-dress resembling those of Isis, -the Sphinx, the capitals of the temple of Denderah, or at a later -period those of Antinous. Even the position of the feet reminds us of -the sphinx, and proves the absence of a knowledge of proportion. - -In South America, in the regions of Lake Titicaca in Peru, lying at an -elevation of 13,000 feet above the level of the sea, i.e. about four -times as high as Snowdon, we have proofs of a very high civilisation. -Artificially-constructed causeways lead over the surrounding marshes to -the sacred town of Cuzco, the capital and central spot of the empire -of the fabulous yet real Incas. Of those times we have a garden of the -Incas, in the warmest and most sheltered part of the island, 'with its -baths, and its fountains still flowing with silvery sheen and murmur.' -Not far from Titicaca is the island of Coati, sacred to the moon. -Here stood the famous palace of the Virgins of the Sun (reminding us -of the Vestals instituted by one of the Roman rulers), flanked by two -shrines dedicated to the sun and moon. These are the best-preserved -specimens of American pre-historic architecture. Round Lake Umayo, on a -peninsula, we find a remarkable group of ancient square burial towers, -known as the Chulpas of Silustani. - -Cuzco was the Rome of the south of the Western hemisphere. The town was -traversed by four high-roads in the direction of the four points of the -compass. It was divided into an upper (_Hanau_) and a lower (_Hurin_) -town. Grouped around the central square in the form of an oval were -twelve subdivisions (_Carrios_). Here stood the great palace, one mile -in length and a quarter of a mile broad; the _Yachahuasi_ (_Huasi_, -houses) dedicated to the instruction of the youth; the _Galpones_, -edifices in which festivals were held; the convent of the Virgins of -the Sun, the _Corichanca_ or Palace of Gold, and the temple dedicated -to the sun, surrounded by chapels dedicated to the moon, the stars, -and to thunder and lightning. Here also stood the eighth wonder of the -world--the great fortress _Sacsahuaman_; the entrances with slanting -jambs, and a large plinth, constructed like inverted stairs, sometimes -in stone, sometimes in excellent stucco, either with or without -ornament. The three lines of massive walls round the town, forming -the defence, were constructed 'en tenaille,' the entering angles all -being ninety degrees; the very best European fortifications, planned -by Vauban or Moltke, could not surpass the terrace-like arrangement -of these three lines of defence. The polygonal blocks, of which the -walls are constructed, are of blue limestone, from eight to ten feet -in length, half as much in width and depth, and weigh from fifteen -to twenty tons each. The first wall has an average height of about -twenty-five feet, the second eighteen feet, and the third fourteen -feet. Total elevation of walls, fifty-seven feet. - -However cursorily we have touched upon art as it developed in the -Western hemisphere, the reader must be impressed by two facts. (1) That -there are analogies between East and West which are too striking to be -attributed to mere chance; and (2) that those who built the edifices -of Uxmal, Palenque, Copan, Chichen, Itza, and Cuzco must have been far -beyond a mere nomadic state. They had palaces, temples, and therefore -a kind of social organisation and religion. Their religion must have -been of a low and cruel character, judging from the representations -of their divinities, and from their using detached limbs of the human -body as arabesques; though we can trace in their calendar, as in their -conceptions of the personified powers of nature, Eastern influences, -connecting the pre-historic West with the historic East. Whilst the -Eastern world used incense at its religious ceremonies, the West used -tobacco smoke. In both hemispheres some mysterious power was attributed -to animals. The helmets of all nations took their origin in this common -belief. Eagles, vultures, wolves, tigers, lions, dragons and serpents -are used to adorn the fighter or to charm his weapons. The custom of -wearing masks and helmets or head-dresses of some terrifying form, -exaggerating the size of the head, is of purely barbarous origin. In -the remains of ancient Mexico, Peru, and the South Sea Islands we -find a variety of carved masks; some resembling human faces, adorned -with false hair, beards and eyebrows; others representing the heads -of birds. They are generally painted, often ornamented with pieces of -foliaceous mica to make them glitter, or with turquoises and other -precious stones. - -That the pre-historic man, whether of the East or the farthest West, -had some sort of civilisation may be best studied in his keramic -products. Earthenware vessels, pots, jugs, vases, urns, and amphorae are -as interesting to the art-historian as fossil plants and animals to the -paleontologist, or the different strata of the earth's crust to the -geologist. - -Pottery is one of the most reliable historical documents for fixing the -degree of civilisation of a nation. Fossil pottery very much resembles -antediluvian animals--it is without shape and form. Shells, leaves -and fruits suggested it. By degrees gourds and eggs gave man better -patterns. At a certain period it must have been the fashion in Egypt, -Etruria, Greece, China, Mexico and Peru to use animal and human forms -for vases, bottles, jugs and goblets, whilst horns, skulls and boots -are found amongst Teutons and some savage tribes. The Teutons hoped to -drink sweet honey out of the skulls of their slain enemies in Walhalla. -We cannot wonder that so amiable a creed should have engendered quaint -drinking vessels. We see in our own times plates and dishes adorned -with frogs and lizards, which indisputably prove that there are -pre-historic 'survivals.' From Kyprus we have, in the Imperial Cabinet -of Antiquities at Vienna, an urn with a human face, which is very -much like those found in Mexico, of which the South Kensington Museum -and the Christy collection of the British Museum possess excellent -specimens. - -The wild and fantastic mode of ornamentation in the Western hemisphere, -in pre-historic times, is entirely due to the aspect of nature. Man -seems to have received patterns from India, Egypt and Greece, and -worked them out by reflecting the impressions of an exuberant nature. -Flowers, feathers, pearls, trinkets, hieroglyphs, animals, human -bodies--all are mingled together in endless confusion. Here and there a -symmetrical echo of times long by-gone can be traced. Though, however, -the Western artists of pre-historic times sometimes attained symmetry, -they continually sin against eurythmy. Of proportion and action they -have no conception. They have a style, but a style of their own, devoid -of all those requisites which elevate a product to artistic beauty. - - - - -CHAPTER IV. - -CHINESE ART. - - -The Chinese undoubtedly reached a high degree of culture earlier than -all the historical nations, and still they are in a state of civilised -infancy. They possess reliable historical records referring to periods -when branches of the Aryan group of humanity were still nomads. They -knew that our globe is flattened at the poles, at a time when we -thought it to be a square supported by pillars; they were acquainted -with the properties of the magnet-needle; worked metal; cultivated -the mulberry-tree, systematically fed the silk-worm with its leaves, -weaving its product into the very best silk. In pottery they have -attained the greatest perfection so far as the material is concerned. -In engineering they were not less clever. They have aqueducts, executed -with great daring; innumerable bridges span their rivers; they drained -and irrigated the land at a time when other people assumed a universal -deluge; and yet they remained babies in thoughts and customs, whilst -they grew older and older in age. They have all the manners of -precocious children with prematurely aged faces. This phenomenon can -be explained in figures. There are 400,000,000 of Chinese, nearly all -Turanians. Taking an equal number of Aryans, we shall find that they -are not less than 3,400,000,000 cubic inches short of brain, of which -each inch represents a certain amount of intellectual force. This -deficiency in 'brain-force' shows itself in their totally different -development, and the stationary character of their institutions. They -ingeniously _play_ in science, art, politics, and religion. 4,500 years -ago they reached a high degree of civilisation, and they remained -stationary in their civilised childhood, which they preserve with a -pious veneration. To look back, to believe that the past was better -than the present, has become the static law of China, and has checked -every progress. Their language is agglutinative, only one degree -higher than the savage monosyllabic, and forms a link between this -and the flexible languages. The 450 monosyllables are used to form -1,230 word-sounds, out of which they compose from 40,000 to 60,000 -compounds. They cannot pronounce certain consonants, resembling in this -some badly-taught European children. They say: 'Yoo-lo-pa' instead of -Europe; 'Ya-me-li-ka' instead of America; 'Ma-li-ya' instead of Maria; -'cu-lu-su' instead of crux; 'Ki-li-tu-su' for Christus. Their mode of -writing has developed from pictorial signs. They preserved these; and, -although arbitrary characters have supplanted picture-writing, or -hieroglyphs, they still retain the clumsiness of this form, and have -for every word a special sign. - -Notwithstanding these drawbacks they possess an encyclopaedia in 5,000 -volumes, and a collection of works of fiction amounting to 180,000 -volumes. They can boast of a Socrates in Confucius, of a Plato in -Mem-tsu, and of a Xenophon in Tsem-tsu. - -Five is with them a holy number: they had five emperors during their -Golden Age; there are five great principles on which they base the -possibility of a regulated social existence, viz. humanity, justice, -conformity, uprightness, and sincerity. They have five holy books: the -Shoo-King (political precepts); the Y-King (a philosophy of emanations -based on figures); the Shi-King (a collection of didactical odes and -songs about 3,000 years old); the Li-King (a record of ceremonial -customs and social manners); and the Yo-King (a book on music, -regulating harmony on the most discordant principles). They have five -domestic principles, five elements, five primitive colours, five -seasons of the year, five ruling spirits, five planets, five points -of the compass, five sorts of earth, five different precious stones, -five degrees of punishment, five different kinds of dresses; and their -whole principle of ornamentation is based on five points [Illustration: -(five points forming a rectangle with one point in the middle)]. By -uniting these five points they produce that ingenious system for the -conventional treatment of flowers and animals, which has been divided -by Owen Jones into-- - - _a._ The continuous stem system; - _b._ The united fragmentary system; and - _c._ The interspersed fragmentary system. - -In these three systems they observe the natural laws of radiation and -tangential curvature. - -But in all their works of art appears the spectre of childishness, with -wrinkles in its withered face. Their patterns in textile art are such -as some people delight in for the sake of their quaint originality. -They altogether neglect the laws of ornamentation; and we never know -whether in ornamenting a vase they did not intend to dress a Chinese -lady for a tea party, or whether in dressing a high-standing mandarin, -or a lady in stiff brocade, they did not intend to ornament one of -their peculiarly-shaped tea-pots. In fact their vases are ladies in -brocade dresses, whilst their gentlemen and ladies look like ambulatory -vases. We often see on a lady, 'doves as big as bustards, cooing; -flowers and trees growing on plates and vases upside down, and inside -out.' We see a mandarin strutting about, adorned with an embroidered -tree with fifty different foliages. One screen is decorated with fishes -with feathers, another with birds with fins, or monstrous dragons creep -on the ground or fly in the air. Everything in art is done as it ought -not to be done. It is as if some merry and mischievous hobgoblin had -instructed the Chinese to make up a kind of artistic patchwork out of -all the odds and ends of ornamental fancies, distorted figures, and -incomprehensible combinations. - -Their towns look like large encampments of nomad hordes, ready at -a moment's notice to take up their tents and run away. Though they -have constructed a huge wall, which is 25 feet thick at the base, -diminishing to 15 at the platform, provided at distances of 100 yards -with towers about 40 feet square at the base, diminishing to 30 at the -top, and about 37-48 feet in height; though they have carried this over -the ridges of lofty hills (one of them 5,000 feet above the level of -the sea), and led it through the deepest valleys, or upon arches over -rivers--their architecture is still in its very infancy. It is a kind -of toy-architecture. The walls of their houses may be pulled down, and -the houses still remain standing. For architecture with the Chinese -is in no way an organic total; it is not even a chemically-united -composition; but a mechanically-joined something, without any ruling -and connecting idea. Contrary to all rules of good architecture, they -express in their constructions the principle of the separation and -independence of the active elements of the building, instead of their -union and harmony. It is variety without unity. Their walls are mere -screens in bricks or wood, mere frameworks for tapestry. The wall -with them does not support; it appears movable and totally distinct -from the roof. The scaffolding which supports the horizontal, as also -the vertical enclosures, belongs more to textile than to tectonic art -The Turanian is still addicted to fascine work, like the pre-historic -lake-dweller, or our contemporary aboriginal New Zealander. The -divisions in the interior of the house are movable; either consisting -of real carpets, lattice-work, wooden-jointed leaves, or boards, -ornamented to imitate carpets or movable screens. Imitations of -flowered woven-stuffs, lacquered panels with impossible perspectives, -bamboo tress-work, with protruding knobs, carved and turned into -gaping and grinning fantastic monsters, are also among the principal -characteristics of Chinese architectural ornamentation. Chinese -trellis-work has a fairy-like appearance. The patterns are infinitely -varied, either closely fitting or perforated, dividing and enclosing -spaces, surrounding terraces as railings, running up the staircases, or -forming large borders between column and column. - -The trellis-work of the Chinese may be divided into three classes:-- - -1. The bamboo _wicker_-work, a close imitation of textile fabrics; in -fact, woven wood-work. - -2. The _lattice_-work, a kind of transition or metamorphic work between -trellis and cross-barred work. The patterns are of a grosser kind. - -3. The _mixed_-work, a combination of the two classes. - -The first is generally used in ornamenting the interior of the -basements of the houses. The natural bright yellow tint of the bamboo -is either left, or it is lacquered in variegated colours to heighten -the effect of the patterns. - -The lattice-work is used for door and window-frames. In the latter case -the holes are filled up with transparent shells, coloured paper, or -painted glass, which has been in use since 3000 B.C. - -The mixed-work runs along the walls, forming a frieze of gilt metal -or alabaster. The last-named material is employed in summer-houses -as a finish to the outer space, connecting bright red or light blue -columns. When thus used the effect is undoubtedly charming. The roofs -are tinted dark green, an unconscious reminiscence of by-gone times, -when they were made of the leafy branches of trees or the broad foliage -of plants. The dark azure of heaven shining through the perforated -trellis-work, contrasting with the white marble of the substructure and -the red columns, forms a combination both striking and agreeable. The -upper parts of a building appear to swim in the air. - -The brick walls of the Chinese are bare of stucco; the void -predominating. They use the walls either as enclosures for court-yards, -as isolated protecting walls before the entrances of houses--reminding -us of the gates of India or the propylaea of Egypt--as substructures, -or as enclosures and partitions for dwelling-places. All these -walls are constructed of air-dried, fire-baked, or glazed tiles and -bricks. The latter are only used for temples or imperial buildings. -Whilst we possess a Board of Public Works that unfortunately has -no administrative power, and cannot prevent our thoroughfares -from being constructed according to the principles of a most -inveterate symmetrophobia (hatred of all order, shape, style, and -homo-geneousness), the law in China goes so far as to regulate even -the use of building material, not according to any esthetical rule, -but pandering merely to rank and class interest. White marble may only -be used for imperial substructures, the enclosure of imperial courts, -and in the construction of imperial bridges, and must never be used -as wall-decoration. Their cement for coating walls is like ours; the -stucco flat coloured, and the colours mixed with the plaster before -laying on. According to his station in the State, the owner of a house -may surround it with a wall of clay or lime, or with one of air-dried -or fire-baked bricks. Only the walls of princes may have stone plinths. -The encircling walls of imperial palaces have a roof of bright yellow, -and light-green glazed tiles. The Tshao-Pings, or protecting walls, -placed before the entrance doors of houses, like screens before our -fire-places, have large protruding plinths. They differ in colour -according to the rank of the owner. Generally they are white, with -painted ornamentation. Before the houses or palaces of princes the -colours are red with gold, and the covering green or yellow. Before -_Miaos_, temples of honour, they are nearly always of bright yellow. -The outer walls are mostly white, decorated with incrusted landscapes -or other conventional decorations. The inner walls are red and richly -ornamented with gold; they have a kind of frieze ornamented with -trellis-work, so as apparently to detach the support from the supported -roof. In the houses of the higher classes the walls are decorated with -damask, and in those of the commoners with paper-hangings, which latter -we have adopted. Drapery is also freely used, hanging down and serving -to divide the interior spaces of the houses. Doors and windows are -still formed of curtains, as in the primitive times of civilisation in -Assyria, India, and Babylon. - -We are all acquainted with the excellence of Chinese silk-weaving, -interspersed with golden threads, as also with the brightness and -originality of some of their patterns, whenever they keep to an -imitation of nature in their floral forms. They are generally, -however, too realistic, the material not unfrequently appearing like a -botanist's herbarium, or like a collection of butterflies or stuffed -birds. Their embroidery is not less old than their silk-weaving. As -early as 2205 B.C. in their statistical records (numbering about 4,768 -volumes) gold, silver, copper, ivory, precious stones--_five sorts of -pigments_ of mineral extraction--silk, hemp, cotton, weavings of these -materials, and the feathers of all sorts of birds are mentioned. The -woven stuffs are of one colour. Silk is either red, black, white, or -yellowish, weaving in colours not being known. The frequent mention -made of birds' feathers may serve as a proof that they were used for -embroidery, which in primitive times was more an 'opus plumarium' than -embroidery proper, which is the forerunner of the art of painting. -Feather crowns, kilts, and dresses are still in use amongst the savages -of our own times. The colours are given by nature, and suit the -grotesque taste of the undisciplined mind by their bright variegations -and incongruities. - -The oldest Chinese embroidery in colours was perfectly plastic. The -plants, flowers, animals, and even figures, formed a polychromatic -relief on the flat surface of the stuff. This style is still -fashionable in China, though, instead of feathers, artificially -coloured threads are used, always so as to make the objects appear -raised from the surface. Even at present life-size figures in relief, -or whole scenes, are executed with the needle in brightly-coloured -silk threads. We are here involuntarily reminded of the reliefs of -Nineveh, and we may assume that they are nothing but a transformation -of embroidery into stone or alabaster. - -The dresses, furniture, saddles, tea-pots, shoes and boots, jackets, -covers, weapons, doors, and windows of the Chinese are all -ornamented with patterns which have had their origin in this kind of -relief-embroidery, traces of which are found even in their lacquered -and keramic products. - -The roofs of their houses are curved and drawn up like their features; -they are copies of lids of baskets, tea-caddies, urns, or of caps and -hats. The protruding parts are richly ornamented with dragons. The -dragon with the Chinese is the prototype out of which man developed; -the dragon is therefore the symbol of the imperial power. - -Whilst the Chinese are altogether deficient in painting, because they -have no idea of perspective or shading, they certainly excel in the -technical treatment of keramic works of art, especially in the paste, -which they make of kaolin, a decomposed feldspathic granite. The forms -of their genuine pottery are most primitive in outline; dishes, cups, -plates, and bowls are cylindrically shaped, as are their bottles and -jars. Our South Kensington Museum abounds in specimens illustrating -this. - -Sharp naturalism and an exact reproduction of the forms of nature, -without any skill in the conventional treatment of flowers, creepers, -leaves, stems, fruits, and animals, prevail in all Chinese and Japanese -works. The artist, if he intends to work in the Chinese style, must -divest himself of all considerations for the higher esthetical -principles of art; he must stoop to the tastes and delights of -children, must study thoroughly their every-day customs and manners, -enter into their mode of thinking, try to make the quaint quainter, -and the grotesque still more grotesque. A big sun with thick rays in a -corner to the right; some sharply-drawn trees in the middle; a bridge -up in the clouds with a dog running over it; some children with large -heads playing to the left; a bright stream marked with rough waves, -through which fishes are peeping; the whole excellently finished so -far as the lacquered work goes--and a Chinese tray is complete. The -coloured enamel on keramic works, and their lacquered or varnished -ware, notwithstanding their unimaginative naturalism and monstrously -fantastic delineation, surpass anything we are capable of producing in -the West of Europe. Their magnificent folding-screens, trays, tubs, -wash-hand basins, toilet-cases, work-tables, perfume-cases, frames for -looking-glasses; their jewel-tables--full of little drawers, secret -nooks and corners, puzzling openings, and hidden shuttings--are so -many additional proofs of their childish nature. They use the fret, -which they have in common with the Mexicans, Peruvians, and Greeks. -Whilst, however, the latter arrived at a continuous system of fret -ornamentation, the Chinese still use it mostly fragmentarily, either -one link after the other, or one above the other, without forming a -continuous ornament. - -We see in the Chinese one of the most interesting phenomena in -the history of mankind, whether we look upon them from a social, -religious, or artistic point of view. They govern their State on -paternal principle, and on the grand rule, 'Do to another what you -would he should do unto you, and do not unto another what you would -not should be done unto you. Thou only needest this law alone; it is -the foundation of all the rest' (Confucius in the sixth century B.C.), -and yet they have made no progress in sciences and arts. The paternal -government and home-rule check every thought. A moral principle of -the very highest meaning has, as with many of us, worked badly. They -have done unto others what others have done unto them. They cheated -because they were cheated; they told falsehoods because they were -deceived by others; they were hypocritical because others were so too; -and they robbed and plundered others, because they were robbed and -plundered themselves. In this moral chaos they forgot to cultivate -the intellectual force of reasoning; they thus further disturbed -the already deranged equilibrium between morals and intellect. And -though they had gunpowder before the West of Europe, it remained in -the far East of Asia a mere toy to amuse young and old at festivals, -whilst in the possession of Western Europe it became, next to the -art of printing, the most powerful agent of civilisation. They had -paper before the West of Europe; they knew how to print at least -five centuries before Europe thought of re-inventing this Chinese -invention. They are as polite, if not politer, than the most civilised -Frenchman, and are witty and good-humoured. They have no fear of -death; trade with the same skill and perseverance as we; cultivate the -soil with even greater industry and ability than we; so that their -territory, about equal in extent to the whole of Europe, looks like -one great well-drained and irrigated garden, in which no spot which -can yield some return for assiduous labour is left uncultivated. There -is amongst the 400,000,000 of subjects of one single emperor not -one who cannot read and write. All places in the administration are -assigned after a severe competitive examination, and still they lack -the capacity of self-conscious, independent reasoning both in science -and art. They can paint a tiger-skin with such truthfulness that it -appears a real skin, framed under glass; but in the conception and -reproduction of the head of the ferocious brute, with its bloodthirsty -jaws and its merciless cruelty, they altogether fail. They have an -aversion to a proportionate division of space; they never attempt to -counterbalance their artistic ideas, and to arrange them according to -a law. They abhor spiritual, imaginary, and all higher intellectual -culture to such a degree, that they concentrate all their powers on -mere technicalities. Therefore they have remained stationary, whilst -others, who began their self-conscious national existence thousands -of years later, have left them far behind. The Chinese sacrifice -everything to preconceived ideas of custom--in morals, science, and -art. As our forefathers did, let us do also. The result of this -principle has been that curious, grotesque, and ingenious, but above -all childish art, which we must study as the link between savage and -Aryan art. Whilst the Negro scarcely went beyond geometrical figures, -we find the Turanian already capable of using plants and the lower -kinds of animals in ornamentation, in addition to geometrical figures. -As soon, however, as he approaches beings, in whom proportion, action, -and expression, as the higher elements of form, prevail, he loses his -power of reproduction altogether. - -Matter-of-fact prose is the element of the Turanian; he is without -every higher artistic feeling, because his mode of writing, speaking, -and thinking, his religious, social, and political organisation, has -till lately checked all expansion of the imagination, and the use of -the intellectual faculties. Art with him has remained undeveloped, and -however interesting his products may be, they form only a subject for -our curiosity and perhaps momentary fashion, showing what humanity at -large did when in its _infancy_. - - - - -CHAPTER V. - -INDIA, PERSIA, ASSYRIA, AND BABYLON. - - -Our tree of art, with its manifold branches, flowers, and fruits, -rooted in the unknown origin of the three great groups of humanity, -shows that the Negro, or black branch, had a very short growth. It -still lives on in savage art, but is crippled, and has no vitality. -Next we have seen the long line of Turanian art, represented by -the Chinese; it originates in the geological age, passes through -the mythical, traditional, and historical periods, and continues -uninterruptedly to modern times. We have up to this point treated of -the artistic productions of the Negro and Turanian groups, both of -which stand without the pale of real history. - -We now take up the art-history of the Aryan, the historical group. -The birth-place of this group undoubtedly was Central Asia. Thence -the pure Aryan group took two divergent roads. One division crossed -over the Himalaya Mountain chain, and settled round the Brahmapootra, -the Indus and Ganges rivers, and the other remained on this side -of the mountains. The Aryans may, therefore, be best divided into -Trans-Himalayans and Cis-Himalayans. In these two groups we find the -oldest traces of a power slowly awakening to full consciousness. We -can perceive in remote ages, only measurable by means of analogy and -deduction, an endeavour to solve the greatest problems of our existence. - -To find answers to these _three_ questions: Where from? What for? Where -to? To measure the _three_ dimensions of space and time; to trace -the cause of which the _three_, ever stable and still ever varying, -phenomena are the effect; and to know what creation, preservation and -annihilation, or rather only transformation, are, has been the chief -aim of the Aryan mind; and, as history teaches us, they have found more -or less distinct answers to these questions. We are not only capable -of philologically tracing the development of the different languages -of the Aryan group step by step to one common parent-language--the -Sanskrit, but the art-historian may trace every mysterious conception -of the powers of nature, every form of personification or incarnation, -and every religious tenet or mystery, symbol or myth, to these same -Indians, who with the words _Pita_, _Mata_, _Brahta_, _Duihta_, -have taught us the holiest relations of our family life. For words, -like pictures, are only representatives of outward impressions. To -the Trans-and Cis-Himalayan Aryans we can trace all theogonies, -cosmogonies, systems of esoteric pathology and mythic anthropology. -They first saw in geometrical forms the phenomena of the material as -well as the spiritual world; gave meaning and interpretation to these -mystic types; peopled heaven and earth with visible and invisible, -good and evil, gods, goddesses, and spirits. They first acknowledged -the 'noumenal,' or invisible, divine nature with its creative force; -and recognised the 'phenomenal,' or visible, nature of the world -as an emanation, evolution, development, outgrowth, or mere work -of the invisible Creator. All the gods of the Persians, Assyrians, -Babylonians, Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, and a great number of -the customs of Hebrews and Christians, may be traced back to Indian -conceptions, forms, and modes of worship. - -Not historical events only, but the whole life of humanity centres -round religion. For science and art were in olden times the direct -offsprings of religion. Neither science nor art can be understood, -unless we have a clear insight into the mythologies and religious -conceptions of the ancient peoples. Our great mistake has been, that -till very lately we detached one of the different branches of the tree -of knowledge. We criticised its bark, leaves, blossoms, and fruits -separately, never concerning ourselves about the ramifications of the -root, the soil in which it first spread, the chemical substances on -which it fed, the conditions of climate under which it flourished or -withered, never enquiring whether it brought forth only flowers and -never fruits, or for what purposes its fruits and flowers were used -by those who gathered both. Now without such understanding artists are -mere unconscious machines, groping in the dark of ignorance, never -capable of a clear reproduction of forms. Education and a higher -conception flow like invisible magnetic streams through the hand, -whether it hold pencil, paint-brush, chisel, or engraver's needle, and -endow the work of art with a vitality which forms its real charm. It -is never the technical correctness that appeals to us most strongly -when contemplating even the smallest work of art, but the thought which -animated the artist when constructing his forms. - -Whilst the savage scarcely ever acquires a correct notion of time and -space, and the Turanian only a limited one, the Aryan gathers from -them the first dim recognition of the Infinite. In time and space -perceptible changes take place, through the influence of an invisible -power which creates all visible things. In time and space all created -things are preserved, and in time and space all either perish or assume -different forms. The Aryans endeavoured to express these abstract, -yet concrete phenomena by signs. A triangle with three equal sides -appeared best to express the mystery of the three equally powerful -forces--creation, preservation, and transformation. - -In the very earliest dawn of civilisation, therefore, the triangle -became the hallowed symbol of the Divinity. After the _Symbolic_ and -_Dialectic_ period had given place to the _Mythological_, time and -space were looked upon as the origin of all things, out of which -Brahma, Vishnu, and S'iva had sprung. These three incomprehensible -forces were expressed by geometrical figures, or, so to speak, -crystallised, before they became incarnate persons. The creator had the -sign of a double triangle [Illustration: (apexes upwards)] which formed -three triangles symbolically representing the three forces in ONE, the -CREATOR. Vishnu was designated by an equilateral triangle with the apex -pointing downwards, [Illustration] meaning the preserver; whilst S'iva -had for his symbol a triangle with the apex upwards, [Illustration] -denoting the transformer. - -The divinities were placed in the following order: S'iva first, then -Vishnu, and Brahma last, to whom no temples were built. This was the -case with nearly all the races of the Aryan group; there are scarcely -any temples to Amn, Brahma, Zeruane-Akerene, Uranos, Wodan, &c. - - -The order of the symbols, as given below, with their five -significations-- - -[Illustration: - - (Triangle apex up, Triangle apex down, Three triangles as trapezoid) - - S'IVA. VISHNU. BRAHMA. - - 1. Transformer, Preserver, Creator, - 2. Fire, Water, Sun, - 3. Justice, Wisdom, Power, - 4. Future, Present, Past, - 5. Time, Space, Matter,] - -produced the most sacred word-- - - =AVM= or =OM=, - -expressed by this triangular combination-- - -[Illustration: (Six-pointed star)] - -This was the mysterious TRIMURTY of the Indians, from which in time, -according to the influences of nature, the degree of intellectual -development, and the social and political condition of the different -groups of the Aryan races, grew the different mystic conceptions of the -_triune_ power in _one_, working in nature. - -Whilst the Trans-Himalayans, influenced by a gorgeous nature, allowed -their imagination to run wild, and to distort the primitive mystic -simplicity of these religious conceptions, the Cis-Himalayans remained -more faithful to the first impressions of nature, and worshipped Light -and Fire as the symbols of intellect, righteousness, and virtue, in -opposition to Night, as the symbol of ignorance, injustice, and sin. -To the triangular forms, the circle, [Illustration: (circle)] the -serpent, was added, the form without beginning and end; no wonder -that, encircling the equilateral triangle and joined to the square, -it became the symbol of the mysterious, incomprehensible forces of -nature. The [Illustration: triangle, square, and the circle] united, -intersected, combined, isolated, and crossed, formed the fundamental -lines of temples and their decorations. It was only at a later period -that animal and monstrous human forms were conceived to personify -abstract divine powers. The attributes of Ether, Water (Indra), and -Fire (Agni), were transformed into acting persons. The three equal -sides of the triangle, influenced by the imagination of the expounders -of matters divine, were changed into an individual with three heads, so -as to give a more comprehensible form to the incomprehensible divine -power. - -[Illustration: (Three heads with pointed caps)] - -The Trans-Himalayans, once settled on the gigantic triangular peninsula -stretching into the Indian Ocean, had leisure to work out a vast -theogony, which has served the Aryans down to our own days as a -store-house for different mythologies and religious systems. - -The _Divespiter_ of India (Deus pater, Jupiter) became the Lord of the -sky, the Lord of hosts; his weapon was the thunderbolt. He possessed a -splendid garden, the paradise, _nandana_. - -_Ganesa_ is Janus, the god with two heads. He was the guardian of -ways; he had a _rod_ or _sceptre_ in his hand (the shepherd's crook -or crosier) and a _key_--symbolic of his power to enter upon all the -important undertakings of mankind. - -_S'ri_ or _S'ris_ (Seris--Ceres), also _Lakshmi_, _Padma_, and -_Camala_, was the goddess of abundance, sprung from the sacred Lotus. - -_S'iva_, the Greek _Zeus_, the Egyptian _Jao_, the Hebrew _Javeh_, the -Roman _Jovis_, with their analogous attributes of revenge, jealousy, -indomitable caprices, terror, and irreconciliation, all point to one -and the same origin. Of S'iva (as of Zeus, Jovis, or Javeh elsewhere) -it is recorded in Indian mythology that he had to fight with Daityas -(Titans, or fallen angels), the children of Dity. Indra, on this -occasion, provided the God of Fire, Justice, and Transformation with -fiery shafts. Again, Jove overthrew the Titans and giants, whom Typhon, -Bisareus, and Tityus led against the ruler of Olympus. The same is done -by Javeh or Jehovah, who hurled the legions of proud and overbearing -angels under Satan's rule into the infernal regions. The analogy is too -striking to require any further comment. - -_Paulastya_ (the Greek and Roman _Pluto_), or _Kuvera_, the Egyptian -_Typhon_, the Hebrew _Satan_, bears a general family resemblance to the -conceptions of the chiefs of the lower regions. - -_Garuda_, the beautiful bird with a lovely human face attending on -Vishnu, is the prototype of the youthful, blooming _Ganymede_ attending -on Zeus, not only in similarity of name, but especially in similarity -of function. - -_Durga_, who takes her name from brandishing a lance, is, like _Pallas_ -or _Minerva_, the Indian representative of heroic valour and reflecting -wisdom. Both _Durga_ and _Pallas_ slew demons and giants with their own -hands; both protected the wise and virtuous who paid them due respect -and adoration. _Seraswati_ and Minerva have also much in common. The -Minerva of Italy invented the flute, and Seraswati presided over melody. - -_Is'wara_ and _Is'i_ of India are undoubtedly the originals of Osiris -and Isis. - -_Dypuc_ read backwards gives us _Cupid_. The Indian name is derived -from _De'paka_, the inflamer. The mischief-maker of India and -Greece had one and the same name. We find his name and character in -Shakespeare's masterly delineation of _Puck_. - -These analogies go much farther and deeper than is at first sight -apparent. - -_S'iva_ is said to have had three eyes, symbolic of the three -dimensions of time. A serpent, denoting the measurement of time by -years, formed his necklace. A second necklace of human skulls marked -the lapse and revolution of ages, and the extinction and succession -of the generations of mankind. He holds a trident in one hand, -signifying that the attributes of the other gods are united in him. -S'iva is also called _Trilochana_ (three looks--_lochan_, the eye, the -look). Pausanias tells us that Zeus was honoured with the name of -_Triophthalmos_ (three-eyed), and that a statue of Jupiter had been -found at the taking of Troy exhibiting the father of the gods with a -third eye in his forehead. - -Vishnu appeared on earth in several incarnations. The Indians look -upon the planets as habitable. The sun was set down as the motor, -directing the movements of these planets, furnishing them with light, -and endowing them with the genial heat of vitality. _Krishna_ (the -black or blue one) was, like the Greek Apollo, the symbol of the sun, -of light, of purity, and of love. He is represented as the promised -Saviour, the eighth incarnation of Vishnu. According to the Vedas, the -Earth complained to Vishnu, and demanded redress. It then received the -promise of a Comforter and of a total renovation. Time is then said to -have hastened to the birth of _Krishna_, 'that bright offspring of the -gods, who sets forward on his way to signal honours. The world with -its globular, ponderous frame, nodding signs of congratulation, when -the _sweet babe_ will distinguish his mother by her smiles!' Krishna, -whom the Samaritans believed to have been Joshua, the long hoped-for -Messiah, at last appeared on earth, where he passed a life of a most -extraordinary and incomprehensible nature. He is said to have been -the son of _Devaki_, a virgin, by King _Vasudevas_, but his birth -was concealed for fear of the tyrant _Kansa_, his uncle, to whom it -had been predicted that a child, born of that mother, would destroy -him, and put an end to his dominion. Krishna had to hide, and was -brought up in _Mal'hura_ by honest herdsmen. He performed most amazing -miracles, saved multitudes by his supernatural powers, raised the dead, -and descended into the infernal regions of Patala, where the king of -serpents, Seshanaga (suggestive of the name of Satana), ruled, that he -might reanimate the six sons of a pious Brahman, who had been killed -in battle. Krishna obtained a glorious victory on the banks of the -_Yamuna_ over the great serpent _Kaliya Naga_, which poisoned the air, -destroying the herds of that region. _Apollo_ also destroyed with his -arrows the serpent Python. The whole legend, in both instances, took -its origin in the action of the rays of the sun, purifying the air, and -dispersing the noxious vapours of the atmosphere, which bred loathsome -animals. Krishna and Apollo are thus identical in their actions. -Krishna is disappointed by Tulasi, Apollo by Daphne; both conceptions -liked the companionship of shepherds and shepherdesses. The _Tulasi_ -(or lotus) was sacred to Krishna, as the _Laurus_ (laurel) to Apollo. - -These and similar legends ought to be studied by artists to enable -them not only to understand Indian art from a higher point of view, -but to learn that many a monstrous form had a sacred symbolic meaning, -that outward signs may be hallowed by hidden conceptions; and that, -wherever this is the case, art will not succeed in reaching the -bright spheres of beauty. The finest sculptured Durga without her -necklace of human skulls, the protruding red tongue, the four arms -with outstretched fingers balancing severed human heads, &c., would -no longer convey to the mind of an Indian worshipper the idea of the -goddess of valour and wisdom. Thus we may understand how a baked clay -Indian idol, in spite of its revolting form, may be the symbol of some -grand idea, through which it obtains value in the eyes of the credulous -believer. In considering the causes that produced the peculiar -development of Indian art, we must not omit to refer to the continually -increasing power of the Brahmans. - -Symbolism and mysticism were used by the priests of all ancient -nations for thousands of years in preparing intoxicating draughts of -superstition for the people, and proving the necessity for making -sacrifices. At first depraved passions only were to be sacrificed, -but by degrees they tried to typify those passions by animals, -with analogous propensities. Goats became the representatives of -licentiousness; bulls, types of indomitable fury and insubordination; -and these animal types were offered to the gods. As soon as the priests -had convinced the people that the blood of animals, the smoke from -their burning bodies, the odour of roasting sheep, might appease the -anger of S'iva, fanaticism went a step further, and drew human beings -into the awful vortex of prejudice, and thousands of men and women were -crushed, joyfully screaming, under the heavy wheels of Jugurnaut's, -S'iva's, or Harris's cars. Men and women were burned alive; -intellectual progress stopped, asceticism and blind submission to -priestly despotism were enforced, and the possibility of a progressive -art was crushed for thousands of years. - -This desolate state of society required reform, and _Manu_ stepped -forward. He divided society into four distinct layers: the Brahmans, -Kshattryas, Vaisyas, and S'udras, of which the two first were Aryans, -the third caste Turanians, and the fourth Negroes; consequently, in -spite of the excellence of his laws, which were assumed to have been -dictated by Brahma himself, no real art was possible. - -The Indians have two great national epic poems, containing nearly the -whole substance of all the epic poems of the other Aryan races, and -the many scenes from the Ramayana and Mahabharata in carvings and -sculptures stand in the same relation to Greek art, as these poems -to the Iliad and Odyssee. In both, scenes of heroism are displayed; -but, whilst symmetry and proportion rule in the Greek poems, fantastic -irregularity, wild incongruities, exaggerations and impossibilities -are heaped up in the Indian. The beauty of some thought is effaced by -overburdened metaphors, gushing forth in an endless stream like the -waters of the Ganges. There are passages in the 28,000 double verses -of the Ramayana surpassing anything written. - -As an indisputable proof I will quote a few lines from the opening -passages of the Ramayana. The gods are assembled before the first, -incomprehensible cause, and address it in the following words:-- - - O Thou, whom _three_fold might and splendour veil, - _Maker_, _Preserver_, and _Transformer_, hail! - Thy gaze surveys this world from clime to clime, - Thyself immeasurable in space and time: - To no corrupt desires, no passions prone: - Unconquered conqueror, infinite, unknown; - Though in one form Thou veil'st Thy might divine, - Still, at thy pleasure, every form is Thine. - Pure crystals thus prismatic hues assume, - As varying lights and varying tints illume; - Men think Thee absent, Thou art ever near; - Pitying those sorrows which Thou ne'er canst fear. - Unsordid penance Thou alone canst pay; - Unchanged, unchanging--old without decay: - Thou knowest all things--who Thy praise can state? - Createdst all things--Thyself uncreate! - -The endeavour to give forms to such sublime abstractions made the -Indians lose their regulating power in pictorial and plastic art. A god -was to be made powerful, and he was provided with four or twenty arms, -and three heads. The miraculous and symbolic were the greatest enemies -of Indian art. - -In the Mahabharata, exceeding Homer's combined poems seven times in -quantity, having not less than 110,000 double verses, we read of -sentiments, feelings, and deeds which are our own--but nothing is -within the pale of the credible. The birth of all the heroes is -miraculous. Their deeds surpass the standard of human acts. They -constantly associate with the gods, talk, argue, and dispute with -them; their palaces are of immeasurable grandeur and splendour: ivory -gates inlaid with jewels, golden pillars, diamond thrones, glittering -with the splendour of a thousand suns; their armies are reckoned by -millions; their heroes uproot trees, and kill hundreds of thousands at -one blow; time and space have no meaning with them. Kings reign 27,000 -years; Prathama-Raja reigned 6,300,000 and lived 8,400,000 years.[1] -How could art in a higher sense exist under such conditions? - - [1] By striking off the zeros, which are put on by the - Brahmans _out of respect_, the figures may be reduced to - some natural compass of possibility. - -Art in a more comprehensible form appeared in India only when Buddha -came to attempt a second regeneration of the people. He abolished -castes, preached equality and freedom, and succeeded in awakening a -high force of artistic activity in the dreamy Indians. But their art -was altogether confined to the construction of rock-hewn temples, of -stupas, topes, and religious buildings--architectural constructions in -comparison with which even our greatest cathedrals dwindle into mere -child's play. Their works of art are tinged with the same exaggerations -as their great heroic poems, and when Buddhism was stamped out -in its birth-place about the seventh century A.D., the Brahmans -constructed their temples, vying with those of the Buddhist artists in -architectural grandeur. They went back to their monstrosities, but they -could no longer check the artistic power of the Aryan spirit. - -The rock-hewn and isolated temples of India have details in stucco, -of ornamentation, foliage, and general decoration, which, like their -mythology, their heroic poems, and their abstruse philosophy, went -through all the artistic metamorphoses of pliable, plastic, elastic and -solid substances. In all we observe an unbounded play of imagination, -uncontrolled by any law of symmetry. The walls are decorated with the -most exquisite shawl and lace patterns, either in stucco or hewn in -stone; a proof that before the application of those delicate forms to -wall decorations they must have existed as textile fabrics of high -finish. The rock-hewn temples exhibit clear imitations of rafters -and cross-beams; wood had, therefore, been long in use before they -attempted to imitate it in stone. Their sculptures are wood-carvings, -terra-cotta or plaster-of-Paris works, turned into stone. The -pliability of the softer materials visibly predominates. The gateways -before the Sanchi Tope (see the masterly cast of one of these in the -South Kensington Museum), though hewn in stone, are a close imitation -of wooden posts and cross-beams joined together. This imitation is so -faithful that even the rough and crooked outlines of the badly-cut -posts and beams are preserved. The richness and variety of their -decorative patterns, as also the minuteness of the details, prove that -such patterns must have been carved in wood or fashioned in clay long -before they were executed in the harder material--stone. Stucco must -have served as a means of transition from wood-carving to sculpture. -In the Ramayana the town of Agodhya, built by _Manu_ (the father -and lawgiver of _man_kind), is thus described: 'It was adorned with -beautiful palaces, high as mountains, and with houses of many stories; -everything shining as in Indra's heaven. Its aspect had a charming -effect. The town was enlivened by ever-changing colours; regular -bowers and sweetly-blooming trees delighted the eyes. It was full -of precious stones. Its walls were covered with variegated-coloured -fields resembling a chess board,' &c.; the latter allusion giving a -description of tesselated or mosaic work with which the walls must -have been decorated. In a description of a palace in the Sakuntala, -by Kalidasa, who lived a century B.C., we read: 'Over the gate rises -an arch of ivory; above it float flags of a deep yellow hue, the -tassels of which appear to beckon and to call to you: Step in--step -in. The _panels_ of the door are of gold and stucco, glittering like -the diamond breast of a god. Look here! there is a row of palaces -shining like the moon, like shells, like the stem of a water-lily. -_The stucco is laid on as thick as a hand._ Golden steps adorned with -different stones lead to the higher rooms, from which _crystal_ -windows surrounded with pearls look down, glittering like the bright -eyes of a beautiful maiden.' The passage that the stucco was laid -on as thick as a hand can only mean that the ornament was worked in -relief. Richly-painted ornamentation in stucco with mosaic and other -patterns must therefore have existed. These undoubtedly originated, -like the Persian, Assyrian, and Babylonian wall-decorations, in textile -fabrics, which, having been found to perish too quickly, were made of a -stronger, more durable material, preserving, however, all the character -of the original patterns and material. - -The Indians are distinguished by a keen observation of nature, and, -so far as the conventional treatment of flowers, fruits, creepers, -trees, and animals is concerned, we may learn much from them; but we -have carefully to avoid their over-ornamentation. In their treatment -of architecture, want of subordination of the single parts to a -well-proportioned total is the greatest fault; in their sculptures -of the human figure, the soft and waving lines predominate, creating -a kind of voluptuous sensuality which is entirely opposed to good -sculpture. Their naturalism is objectionable, and leads to a wild, -fantastic coarseness which can never be pardoned in art. Measure and -harmony are wanting. Gorgeous and mean, powerful and petty, sublime -and ugly, are their products. Indian art, religion, and poetry are so -closely united that it is impossible to understand the one without -a diligent study of the other two. We have in Indian art the first -attempts of humanity to step out of childhood. To children, wisdom -is best communicated in symbols, mystic signs, fables, legends, -and fairy-tales, and therefore Indian art is distinguished by -these characteristics. The _tupo_, _sutupo_ or _sutheouphu_, from -the Sanskrit _stupa_, a heap (our word _top_) or a pile of earth, -corresponding to a tumulus, was at the same time a symbol of the -religious principles of the Hindoos. It is said of Buddha that he -once preached to his disciples, on the shores of the Ganges, on the -instability of all things, the frailty of human life, on the grief and -sorrows of our existence, comparing life to a water-bubble, consisting -of the four elements and still perishing so quickly. The water-bubble -thus lent its form to the tope and _daghopa_, which latter, according -to W. v. Humboldt, means 'hider of the body,' destined for the -reception of Buddha's relics. The tower which rises inside the tope -is symbolic of the nine incarnations of Vishnu. We have in the Indian -temple, as in our Gothic churches, a homily in stone. The arched dome -has to remind us of the perishableness of life; the daghopa, with its -seven or nine divisions, tells us that there is hope for the immortal -soul to reach heaven through seven or nine degrees of purification. The -protecting canopies (umbrellas) are symbolic of Buddha's intercession, -which he is sure to accord, if we only recognise the _nihilism_ -(nothingness) of our earthly existence. - -The religious construction was also extended to every-day utensils, a -tendency which was universal with all the people of the Aryan group. -To these typical ornamentations belong the lotus flower and the tree -and serpent ornament. The religious conception is everything with -the Indian. It is not the form itself that he cares for, but the -religious thought which is expressed emblematically, allegorically, or -symbolically. This is the reason why he clings to his fourteen-armed -divinities. It is God and His powers that he wishes to represent; but, -whenever man attempts to express the incomprehensible or the abstract -in visible and concrete forms, he errs. The soul of the Indian is -absorbed in God: in Him is everything; the world is _without_ Him and -still _within_ Him. All beings take their origin in Him and return -to Him. An everlasting _emanation_ and _absorption_ is continually -proceeding before the eyes of the Indian, and, looking for a type of -this wonderful process, he found it in the '_Aswatha_' tree, the Indian -fig-tree (_Ficus Indica_). The banyan takes root, so to speak, in -the air, grows downwards, grasps the earth with its branches, shoots -upwards again, and repeats this process 'ad infinitum.' Everything -coming near its feelers is embraced, covered over, and in this mystic -encircling, annihilated. From time immemorial this sacred tree has -been the _tree of life_, the symbolic tree of the petrifaction, -vivification, and incarnation of God's spirit in minerals, plants, -animals and man. This pantheistic conception is not favourable to art: -it crushes the powers of the artist, who has to deal with too great an -ideal weight in forms. - -There is another species of fig-tree (_Ficus religiosa_) which does not -take root again, but the leaves of which appear eternally to tremble; -it became the symbol of the ever-moving and oscillating spheres filling -the universe. The tree combines two working cosmical forces, it partly -remains the same and still continually changes and varies; it is now -covered only with leaves, by degrees with leaves and blossoms, and at -last with leaves and fruits; then its vitality apparently dying away, -leaves, blossoms, and fruits vanish, to be renewed again with the same -regularity and abundance. The mind, not yet accustomed to account for -every phenomenon by simple or compound gases, globules, or atoms, set -in motion by affinities, is altogether absorbed by the miraculous -phenomena of nature, and, having been kept for thousands of years in -this absorption, is incapable of seeing objects in their proper light. -It sees in every form a metaphysical cause, which leads in ornamental -art to those entwined, confused, monstrous, and bizarre combinations, -which mar _symmetry_, mock _eurythmy_, distort _proportion_, have -no _direction_, and, trying to express the inexpressible, have no -_expression_ at all. - -The artist, if he wishes to work in the Indian style, must make himself -acquainted with the feelings that animate the Indian mind. He will -do best by generally using their arabesques, and arranging them after -a careful study of the antique into symmetrical forms. The Indian -conventional treatment of plants in surface-decorations is unsurpassed, -and in this we may learn from them; but we have to beware of their -monotonous excellence, and their everlasting repetitions. We may, here -and there, use their forms, but we must bring order and measure into -the wild and unintelligible chaos. If we want to produce entirely -Indian patterns we must not alter them, or else we destroy their -effect; but we may be original in merely using the form, and endowing -it with a spirit of our own; this being the great advantage of the -historical study of art. - -Indian architecture has been well systematised by Mr. Fergusson. We -have in the north the Bengallee, in the south the Dravidian, and in -the west the Chalukyan style; besides these we have three distinct -religious styles--the Brahmanic, the Buddhistic, and, at a later -period, the Mahomedan. - -Turning to the Cis-Himalayans, who appear under numberless names of -tribes, nations, and races, and by degrees peopled Assyria, Babylon, -Persia, Greece, Northern Europe, Italy, Spain, France, and England, and -carried religion and civilisation into Egypt; we begin to tread, for -the first time, on really _historical_ ground, for we shall be able to -place events in time absolute. - -Persia--the Hebrew Elam, the Indian Paraca, from Pars, or Fars, -or Fardistan--differs entirely in geographical position, climate, -and natural products from China or India. Hekataeos, Artemidoros, -Eratosthenes, and Strabo describe the climate and soil of Persia as -cold and sterile in the north, temperate and fertile in the central -or valley regions, and hot and enervating in the south. We have, -therefore, enterprising activity, energetic courage from the north, -and a counteracting regulating element in the centre, tinged with the -dreamy idleness of the south. The aspect of nature is less oppressive. -Instead of gigantic creepers, the vine, with its juicy grapes, clings -to tall and fruitful trees; bright-eyed gazelles abound; lions and -tigers excite to daring hunts; exquisitely-coloured and fragrant roses -perfume the air, and open the mind to the gentler impressions of a -tender beauty. The Persians, Assyrians, and Babylonians rose to power, -declined, and passed away with all their grandeur; but in these very -changes there were activity and life. The Persians were the first -to proclaim a governing universal _unity_, which endowed men with -forces, enabling them to become virtuous and intellectual _by their own -exertions_. They remained faithful to the first impressions of nature, -in which the Eternal Spirit revealed himself. - -The Persians, like the Indians, expressed the cosmical elements of -creation symbolically by means of geometrical signs, which are given -below. - -[Illustration: (Five simple shapes, stacked, representing ether, air, -fire, water, and earth)] - -[Illustration: (Human-like diagram derived from simple shapes)] - -This _five_ in _one_ comprised the creation; it was the work of Chuda -(Khuda), Choda from the Sanskrit Svadatta (self-given, God-given). -From the Zend word Chuda, or Choda, we have the words GOTT and GOD. -At a later period man's imagination soon perceived in these abstract -signs a concrete form; it turned _Cha_ into the head of a being, _Ka_ -into the arms, _Ra_ into the chest, _Wa_ into the lower parts of the -body, and _A_ into the feet, and thus the first embryonic, ill-shapen -incarnation, or embodiment, of the creative power of nature was formed. -This embryo, by degrees, developed into the master-pieces of Greek -sculpture. - -In Persia, the pure and exalted consciousness of a first, -incomprehensible cause leaving its products, the special manifestations -of its creative power, _free_ in themselves, was fostered and -developed. To the Persians we owe the first clear conception of a God -independent of nature. Spirit and matter are not _one_ with them, -as with the Indians. With the Persians God is separated from His -creation--the universe. God, as the ruling Spirit, acquires subjective -reality; man, His creature, whether good or bad, whether poor or -rich, whether righteous or unrighteous, whether high or low, is, as -His creature, equal and free. Man thus obtained a free position face -to face, if we may say so, with the Supreme Being--the Creator. What -a totally different mode of thinking to that in China or India! In -China man is a mere machine, regulated by stereotyped moral maxims. -In India duties and rights depend on the chance of birth; the Brahman -is a born priest, whether he has talent or not for his vocation; the -Kshattriya, a born soldier, though he may be the greatest coward; the -Vaisya, a born merchant or artisan, in spite of his utter incapacity -for business; and the S'udra, a born slave, though he may be gifted -with greater wisdom than the Brahman, more heroic virtues than the -Kshattriya, and more talent for commerce, trade, or art than the Vaisya. - -In Persia the Aryans acquired, for the first time, a kind of collective -freedom, but not yet an individual consciousness as free agents. The -Indian language and Indian metaphysics, in the garb of mythology, were -undoubtedly components of Egyptian, Persian, Assyrian, Chaldaean, and -Babylonian art, and the forms thus produced, in their turn, became -the direct elements out of which Grecian art in its infancy developed -itself. - -The Persians are direct descendants of the Zend people. Their language -is nearly the same as Sanskrit. Out of ten Zend words, seven or eight -are Sanskrit. - -Persian history may be traced back into time relative; for, when it -passes into time absolute, the advanced state of the people in science, -especially in astronomy, their social condition, and their architecture -and ornamental art, prove that they must have existed in a social bond -for thousands of years, in order to develop and to attain that progress -which excites our astonishment even after the lapse of more than 6,000 -years. - -Their history may be divided into the following periods:-- - -1. The mythic period, from an unknown time down to the foundation of -the vast, well-organised, and powerful Persian empire by Kai-Khorus, -or Kyrus, in the sixth century B.C. - -2. The second period affords reliable accounts of the existence of the -empire down to Alexander the Great, from 560 B.C.-330 B.C. - -3. The history of the Persians, as members of the Greek-Makedonian -empire, ending with the conquest of Persia by the Arabs from 330 -B.C.-137 B.C. - -4. The empire of Central Persia, under the Arabs, down to its -extinction by the Mahomedans in 651 A.D. - -5. The dominion of the Kaliphs down to its destruction in 1258 A.D. - -6. The last period continuing to our own time. - -The mythic and historical periods of Persia resemble two diverging -lines, of which the undoubted fact of the reign of Kai-Khorus forms -the connecting point. Whilst the historical line grows more and -more distinct as it proceeds, the mythic line retreats farther and -farther into the dim region of the unknown. Passing from the known -to the unknown, we must assign to the development of Zend thoughts, -institutions, mode of writing, and mode of building, a greater -antiquity than to the Assyrian and Babylonian monuments. Of Persian -remains we possess nothing but skeleton buildings, which, from the -entire absence of connecting walls, lead us to infer that they were -still mere tents, and that the textile fabric had not yet undergone the -further process of incrustation in stucco or stone sculpture. - -This is not the case with Nineveh and Babylon, the great towns, or, -as we should say, the great empires, on the Tigris and Euphrates. -Through the indefatigable exertions of the Right Hon. Mr. Layard, M. -Botta, Lord Loftus, and Mr. Rassam, we possess now, in London and -Paris, tablets with records more than 3,000 years old. The boundary -stones prove that some fixed laws regulated territorial property, -even at these remote periods. The personal ornaments, consisting -of mother-of-pearl studs, silver rings, bracelets, gold and pearl -earrings, beads, and shell-bosses with bronze pins, testify to a high -civilisation. The mode of writing in Nineveh and Babylon was borrowed -from the Zend people; and the religious conceptions of the Persians are -undoubtedly older than the already-complicated idolatry based on the -astronomical notions of the Assyrians and Babylonians. - -The Zend-Avesta (meaning the living word) may be said to be like an -Egyptian Nile-meter, erected on the primeval soil of history, measuring -the yearly deposits and alluvial sediments of by-gone ages. Through -the pure crystals of myth and poetry we may see the inner formation -of society, whilst from without the vast construction of history is -mysteriously going on. We wander through endless lines of Memnon -statues, all resounding with the legends of past ages, in perusing the -Zend-Avesta, and are suddenly led before the fountain of all matter, at -which the high-priest stands, commanding in the harmony of the seven -planets the birth of the world, and the origin of all things. - -Our first parents, according to the Zend-Avesta, dwelt in _Eriene -Veedjo_, or _Iran Veji_, or Aria, Aturia, Asshuria, meaning the -_fiery_ or _bright_ land, figuratively the blessed land, in a happy -garden, the paradise, assigned to them by _Ormuzd_--contraction of -_Ahura-Mazda_ (the divine Being or the Great Lord). From this they were -driven by Agromainyus, _Ahriman_, the murderer from the beginning, -who changed the seasons, transforming the _seven_ beautiful summer -months into _ten_ cold and dreary winter months, leaving only _two_ -tolerably warm months. The division of the year into _twelve_ months -is clearly proved by this mythic statement. Can anyone count the ages, -and describe the means by which Persians, Chaldaeans, Medes, Egyptians, -and Indians arrived at a systematic arrangement of time, dividing -the year into twelve months? After the reign of the Abads (fathers, -_abbas_) _Azer-Abad_ ruled; then _Dshey-Afram, Kedor-la-Omer_ (Cadam, -Adam) followed; he ruled 560 years, and attained the venerable age of -one thousand years. We find here, as in all old records, the tendency -to ascribe to man a longevity which he has long lost. Like shadows -which are more gigantic in the rising and setting sun than in the -broad mid-day, historical facts in the first dawn of consciousness are -exaggerated and turned into fables, which again vanish in the bright -light of scientific criticism. _Cadam_ was followed by _Siamek_, who -was succeeded by _Tahamur_, who conquered the Devas, or evil spirits. -He learned from them the art of writing and reading, constructed -aqueducts and viaducts, and taught his people music and the use of -iron. The Aryans on this side of the Himalayas had passed the savage -state (the _palaeolithic_ period of art), entered into the nomadic (the -neolithic period), settled down and used bronze instruments, and then -were taught, _no longer_ as with the Indians, Egyptians, and Greeks _by -a divinity_, but by one of their rulers, to extract iron from the ore -and to work it. With Tahamur we step into the iron or historical age. - -_Dshemshid_, the Greek _Achaemenes_, the Biblical _Nimrod_, the -mighty hunter before the Lord, _pierced the earth with a golden -dagger_--allegorically meaning that he improved agriculture. Dshemshid -ruled 616-1/2 years; he built Persepolis, or Takt-i-Dshemshid (the throne -of Dshemshid). He was, however, conquered by _Zahok_ and _sawn into -two pieces_, meaning that the empire of Dshemshid had been divided by -_Zahok_, who was a descendant of the cursed race of Aad. He is said to -have been the _Sesostris_, or _Sesoosis_, of the third dynasty of the -Egyptians, the 332nd king after Menes the builder of Memphis, a great -conqueror who went to India, took possession of Thracia and Skythia, -and united Aethiopia, Libya, and Egypt into one mighty empire in the -fortieth century B.C. He is also said to have been _Ninus_, who with -Semiramis, the night-born queen of doves, and the daughter of the -water-sprung _Derceto_, is set down as the builder of Nineveh, and -the founder of the empire of Babel. Takt-i-Dshemshid existed before -either Nineveh or Babylon; its priority is borne out not only by these -records, but, as we have said, by the very ruins left of the Persian -metropolis. The name _Parsagad_, or _Passagarda_, means '_camp_ of the -Persians,' and points to an early, unsettled state of society; as also -do the ruins, which may be divided into two classes:-- - -1. The ancient Persian monuments of Dshemshid. - -2. The monuments of the reign of the Sassanides. - -The name Persepolis was first used by the Greek historiographers who -accompanied Alexander the Great, to denote that part only of the vast -town in which the tomb of Kyrus was situated, and this gave rise to -much confusion. - -Passagarda, Isthakr, or Estakar, was situated on the border of one -of the richest and most beautiful plains of Central Asia, watered by -the Bendemir (the Araxes of the ancients), and surrounded by lofty -mountains, 'whose rugged masses rise from the verdant plain like -islands from the ocean.' - -The _oldest_ monuments are:-- - -1. The ruins of the palace now called by the Arabs _Tshil-Minar_ (the -forty columns), and two great tombs close by. - -2. Four other tombs, about four and a half English miles to the -north-west, and in the plains of Murghab the ruins of Passagarda, -built by Kyrus to commemorate his victory over Astyages, who came from -Hamadan (Ecbatana). Here is situated the pyramidically-constructed tomb -of Kyrus, made of white marble blocks. Farther north are the ruins of -_Bisutun_. - -Passing to the monuments under the reign of the _Sassanides_; they -consist of reliefs and inscriptions hewn in rock at a distance of about -four and a half miles from the ruins of Persepolis. They are called -_Naksh-i-Rustam_ (the image of Rustam), because it was assumed that the -exploits of this hero were here glorified. De Sacy, in his 'Memoires -sur diverses Antiquites de la Perse,' has explained the inscriptions -as referring to the kings of the Sassanide dynasty. The reliefs are -portraits of these kings, recognisable by their head-dresses. - -The distance from Passagarda to Tshil-Minar is about forty-nine English -miles, and this space is crowded with Persian monuments. It is most -probable that the more recently-made subdivisions did not exist, but -that the capital of the ancient Persian empire extended from Passagarda -to Tshil-Minar, including Isthakr, Naksh-i-Rustam, and the king's -palace, called by the Greeks Persepolis. The palace was cut out of -the beautiful grey marble rock towering over it, and stood on three -well-defined, gradually-rising platforms. The arrangement was like that -of the Indian, Egyptian, and later Greek temples; the first terrace -corresponding to the Pronaos, where the people paid their homage to the -king; the second to the Naos, where the ambassadors of the different -nations assembled; and the third to the Adytum, where the king had his -special temple and private abode. The whole foundation was constructed -of bold Kyklopean masonry. - -At the gates stood colossal fabulous animals, fantastic representations -combined of the lion, the bull, the horse, the wild ass, the -rhinoceros, the ostrich, the eagle, the scorpion, and the unicorn. -Besides these there were winged and horned animals, and others having -the winged body of a lion, the feet of a horse, and the head of a man, -with well-curled, long beard and crowned with the tiara--the symbol of -the king's power, endowed with intellect, force, and swiftness. The -bull with the Persians was, like Nundi with the Indians, Apis with the -Egyptians, and Taurus with the Greeks, a sign of strength and power. - -The capitals of Persian columns were not yet made to support a heavy -stone weight, but only a light wooden beam. The foundation walls -were, like those of Nineveh and Babylon, covered with sculptures, the -designs of which were all of textile origin. But in these sculptures, -as in those of Kouyunjik and the Palace of Nimrod, the theological, or -religious, and symbolical element is entirely left in the background. -We have the friends, relations, and servants of the king; tributaries -submitting to kings; officers holding fly-flaps of feathers; horses -crossing rivers; kings hunting and slaying lions; armies before -besieged towns; warriors returning from battle; battering rams; chains -to destroy the action of rams; soldiers mining ramparts; infantry with -bows and shields; removals of cattle and spoil from captured cities; -boats floating on rivers; galleys going to sea; damsels and children -with musical instruments; and mathematical tablets with calculations -of square roots. We have man active, warring, scientific, and only -here and there some scenes of a religious character, and these more -frequently in Nineveh and Babylon. - -The cause of this phenomenon was the religion of the Zend people. Its -founder was Zarathustra, Zerdusht, {Soroatheos}, Zoroaster--partly a -mythical, partly a real person. His name appears to have been derived -from the Sanskrit Surya-devas, meaning 'the Sun-god.' According to -Aristotle Zoroaster lived 6,000 years before Plato. The Biblical Abram, -Sesostris the Egyptian king, and Moses, were all honoured by this name. -Svedius mentions a Zoroaster 500 years before the Trojan war. The -historical Zoroaster, the compiler of the religious tenets of the Zend -people in the Zend-Avesta, lived about 589 B.C.; he was therefore a -contemporary of Confucius, Pythagoras, Jeremiah, and Ezra. He received -the holy books from Ormuzd on Mount Elbruz. - -The Zend-Avesta assumes _one_ Universal Being, clothed in an outward -form, but this form is _Light_. Light is neither a serpent, nor a -stone, nor a four-handed monster, nor a three-headed Brahma, nor a -bull, owl, or hawk; it is a simple manifestation, it has no particular -existence, it perceptibly pervades universality. It admits of a highly -symbolical interpretation; it is virtue, it is truth, proficiency, -knowledge, and directing will. Light involves an opposite--darkness, -just as virtue has an antithesis--evil. Both light and darkness took -their origin in the unlimited All (Zeruane-Akerene). We have here -clearly a purer Trinitarian conception. We have (1) the Infinite -All, producing (2) light or good (Ormuzd), and (3) darkness or evil -(Ahriman). With the Indians _Brahma_ is ether; _Vishnu_, water; and -_S'iva_, fire; and in spite of all spiritualisation we have _matter_ -before us. The Persians, in becoming conscious of light and darkness, -destroyed the innocence of mankind, but proclaimed to the world _moral_ -consciousness. Without a knowledge of evil there is no knowledge of -good; to be virtuous is to know the evil and to do the good. - -This led the Cis-Himalayans a step further. The two opposing -phenomena, light and darkness, were placed, like good and evil, purity -and impurity, right and wrong, truth and falsehood, knowledge and -ignorance, in eternal conflict. Creation was thus considered as in -everlasting strife. This strife was life-activity in honour of Ormuzd -or Ahriman. This activity was carried beyond this world; for the -followers of Ormuzd, there was a heaven, and for the followers of -Ahriman, a hell in the future. Ormuzd had _Fervers_ as attendants; -Ahriman, _Dews_ or _Devas_ (in Keltic _Dusii_, devils). On the Persian -and Assyrian slabs we see, floating over the heads of the kings, their -winged portraits; these represent their protecting Fervers, one of whom -continually watched over each good man, and protected him from the -influences of Ahriman's servants. - -The worship of Ormuzd, in whose sight all creatures were _equal_, but -equally dependent, was threefold:-- - -(_a_) _Pure thoughts_, through which alone we may approach the -beginning of all things, wisdom and light--God. - -(_b_) _Pure words_, the word of God (the Logos), which is no longer -personified as some visible form, but is the mere vibration of the -spirit of God, embodied in abstract signs in the Zend-Avesta. - -(_c_) _Pure deeds_, accomplished by one's own efforts, as we are -endowed with perfect individual freedom. - -This religion was the cause why the Persians had no special temples, -but only small altars. The vaulted azure heavens were the glorious -temple of Ormuzd, which he was compelled to share with Ahriman. -Neither light nor darkness, however, could be carved or painted; the -dynamic force of the artists was therefore directed to matter-of-fact -scenes, to ornamentations, showing a better balance between forms and -ideas. The rosette, the palmette, the sun with its disc, the moon, -the pine-cone, the pomegranate, intermixed with clearly-defined, and -not much entwined, geometrical patterns, were the principal means of -ornamentation. - -At a later period a tendency to allegorical and emblematic figures -appeared. The artists composed cherubim, chimeras, basilisks, griphons, -kentaurs, and sphinxes; undoubtedly influenced by Indian and Egyptian -ideas, for Nineveh and Babylon were the ancient Venice and Genoa of -the far East, situated as they were on the commercial high-roads, the -twin-rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates. The Babylonian textile -fabrics were highly appreciated from time immemorial. Serpents and -trees, winged witches and flying-fish, were first spell-bound in -Babylonian tapestry, and then carved in stone on the walls of Nineveh. -The immense riches which we possess in the British Museum, enable -every student of art-history to see before him the active life of the -Cis-Himalayans, whether as Assyrians, Persians, Medes, or Babylonians, -in clear and distinct outlines. Their knowledge of embossing gold and -silver was considerable. Their household furniture, drinking cups, -tables, candelabra, bracelets, and rings are of strictly _architectural -construction_. We miss that overburdening confusion in ornamentation -which distinguishes the Indian products; and the more correct -treatment of ornamental outlines, especially to be seen in their -mosaics and tesselated pavements, approaches Greek forms. - -The commercial spirit, which swayed this portion of the river-valley of -the Tigris and Euphrates, engendered a powerful activity in a practical -direction. Whilst we build railways--the Babylonians dug canals, -connected the two rivers, and constructed aqueducts. They built palaces -at Nineveh, castles (El Kassr) at Babylon, and an immense nekropolis at -Vurka, about 180 English miles from Bagdad, and about 8 miles to the -east of the Euphrates. At every step in the interior of these ruins -we find clay-coffins piled up to a height of from 15-20 feet. All -these ruins are now covered with saltpetre, small shells and broken -pottery. The remains of the walls are from 12-22 feet thick, partly of -unbaked and partly of baked bricks. The construction everywhere closely -imitates wood-work, and the decoration reproduces textile fabrics such -as carpets and striped tent covers. There are capitals in stucco of the -Ionic and even of the Corinthian type; though the leaves are those of -the palm-tree instead of the Acanthus. The volute of the Ionic capital -is rather in the form of two serpents drinking from a cup, than in the -form of rams' horns. We might call this old Babylonian stucco capital, -the proto-Ionic type. - -On the two shores of the Euphrates, as far as Babylon, coffins of green -glazed clay and small terra-cotta tablets with cuneiform inscriptions -have been found by thousands. These coffins were imitations of -dead bodies, swathed in cloths and tied with cords. In addition -to this reproduction of textile fabrics in clay, we find with the -Cis-Himalayans a tendency to overlay wood-carvings with metal coatings. -When they advanced more in metallotechnic they still held to patterns -which clearly had their origin in wood-carvings. The plant-like forms -predominate; then we have the quilloche, palm-leaves, or feathers -arranged in the form of palm-leaves, and the pine-cone, which is often -used in eurythmical variation with the conventionally-treated open or -closed tulips, and open or closed lotus flowers. - -The pictorial art of the Assyrians and Babylonians shows us two -distinct periods--an older and a more recent one. The older works had -a bluish-green ground; the later a light, either whitish or yellowish, -ground. In both styles the outlines are marked strongly in black or -dark red. In the older, the sinews are more rope-like and less correct -in their anatomy. In the more recent style a finer treatment, and a -more correct knowledge of the human frame, may be traced. Wild animals -are reproduced with a keen eye of observation, and a strong tendency to -naturalism. - -Polychromy was known to them, but it is very difficult to decide -whether they coloured in tempera or in fresco, with wax or by some -other means--perhaps even in oil. The incrustation of clay walls with -baked and painted, and even glazed, tiles it is difficult to explain. -In many instances, as at Vurka, each cone has its own colour, and, by a -proper arrangement, squares, imbrications, diapers, and networks were -produced; but at Babylon and Nineveh the tiles show clear marks of -painting. Diodorus (probably after Ktesias) gives us a description of -the interior circular wall of the royal palace at Babylon, and says: -'It was decorated with all sorts of coloured human and animal forms -baked in clay, much resembling nature. The whole represented a hunt. -The figures were more than four yards high. Semiramis was to be seen by -the side of her husband Ninus, she killing a panther, he piercing with -his dart a lion.' The principles of decoration with the Assyrians far -surpass mere ornamentations in geometrical patterns. Dramatic life of -a higher kind is introduced, showing greater artistic power than the -reliefs in stone. The outlines are neither black nor red, the treatment -is tasteful, the colours a tender blue, brown, white or yellow, and the -ground a lightish green. These paintings are not mosaics, as at Vurka. - -The baking and glazing must have taken place in the following manner. -The unbaked tiles were arranged and numbered in a horizontal position -on the ground, then they were painted and placed vertically on the -wall as a tapestry decoration. When the wall was finished it must have -been heated, so as to change the light and fluid colours into a kind of -enamel, giving the clay-wall a thin terra-cotta coating. - -The utilitarian purpose was everything with the Persians, Assyrians, -and Babylonians. This is evident in their furniture, especially in -their tables, chairs, and footstools. The construction of the frame -was taken from plants and trees, whilst wild animals were used as -silent and obedient domestic creatures. In supporting their furniture -with the legs of the lion, tiger, or leopard, they used these animals -for an excellent ornamental purpose. The legs of the brute were -made to support, the body was turned into a seat, and the head was -conventionally used as a side-ornament for the backs or arms of the -throne or chair. We see in the Cis-Himalayans, in accordance with their -greater activity in life, a further progress in art. Merely geometrical -figures do not suffice; not monstrous divinities, but animals and men, -are the most important subjects of sculpture. Their architecture was -without symmetry and proportion, the material of their buildings in -no accordance with the monumental tendencies of their construction, -and their efforts did not carry them further than the vague attempts -of half-settled nomads. Their walls, which once consisted of textile -hangings, retained this character, stretching for thousands of feet -without any interruption, except that the doorways had their colossal -symbolic guards, which to a certain extent relieved the monotony of -the construction. The art of Persia and Assyria is in every sense the -transition-link between nomadic and monumental art. - - - - -CHAPTER VI. - -EGYPTIAN ART. - - -'Anything capable of uniting many souls--is _sacred_,' says Goethe. -The sacredness of religious tenets or monumental buildings is at once -explained by this. To unite humanity into one great brotherhood was -first attempted by the Babylonians with their huge tower of Belus, -Baal, or Babel. Men for the first time left patriarchal particularism, -and tried to build a beacon reaching up to the stars, calling humanity -together to one spot, by a work produced by their united labour as a -visible sign of their union. This first attempt at a really monumental -building was made in the plains of the Euphrates. Whilst the people -of Asia still struggled to settle down, and changed their habitations -and with them their forms of art, we see monuments emerge from the dim -past, which reflect man for the first time in his grandeur as wielder -of matter. - -The sphinx in its incomprehensible, mysterious form, half brute, half -human being, may be looked upon as the very emblem of Egyptian art. - -It is written in one of the Hermetic books, 'O Egypt, fables alone will -be thy future history, wholly incredible to later generations, and -nought but the letter of thy stone-engraved monuments will survive.' -Our knowledge of Egypt is scarcely half a century old. It originated -in a black basalt stone, the so-called Rosetta-stone, deposited, at -the beginning of the century, in the British Museum. Approached by Dr. -Young, of Cambridge, with the wand of investigation, this stone poured -forth a little spring, which has now swollen into a mighty river, -carrying off with irresistible force all those little souls who, on -their small boats of prejudice, with tiny chronological ladles, try -to stop the sweeping power of historical truth. We know something -at least of Egypt; we have _monumental_ evidence, which surpasses -all _written documents_, which may be voluntarily or involuntarily -falsified. Egyptologists may be divided into two parties:--the _long_ -and the _short_ chronologists. The _short_ chronologists, in the -face of our advanced knowledge of geology, of the vast accumulation -of pre-historic relics, consisting of flint instruments, pottery, -weavings, and architectural remains (lake and pile-dwellings), deserve -no consideration. They follow the chronological dislocation of Rabbi -_Hillel_, of the first half of the fourth century A.D., with childish -ignorance. This view is the most charitable, as otherwise we should be -driven to accuse them of interested knavery. After the exertions of a -Champollion-Figeac, Boeckh, Barucchi, Bunsen, Brugsch, Henry, Lesueur, -Lepsius, Hincks, Kenrick, Uhleman, &c.--who all belong to the _long_ -chronologists, to turn to the short chronology is impossible. - -_Lepsius_ succeeded in tracing Egyptian history, king by king, event -by event, to Alexander the Great, and hence through the XXXIst, -XXXth, XXIXth, XXVIIIth, XXVIIth, XXVIth, XXVth, XXIVth, and XXIIIrd -consecutive Egyptian dynasties, back to Sheshonk Shishak, founder of -the XXIInd dynasty, who conquered Jerusalem 'in the Vth year of King -Rehoboam,' as is hieroglyphically recorded in Karnac. This furnishes -us with a perfect synchronism between Egyptian and Hebrew history up -to 971-3 B.C. From this point we have innumerable Egyptian tablets, -papyri, and genealogical lists, carrying us upward through the XXIst, -XXth, XIXth, and XVIIIth dynasties to Ramses I. (Ramesu) 15th-16th -century B.C. Here we have a short period of anarchy, represented in -the _Disk heresy_, and find sundry royal claimants, at the head of -whom stands Atenra-Bakhan, or Bexen-aten, called by Lepsius 'Amenophis -IV.' From the reign of his father Amenophis III. every king is known, -by means of hieroglyphical inscriptions on stone and papyri, back to -the beginning of the XVIIth Theban dynasty, in the reign of AAHMES I. -(Amosis), about 1671 B.C. Here again we have the mysterious period -of the _Hyksos_ or Shepherd kings, who, according to Manetho, ruled -511 years. Three dynasties may be put down for this period--the -XVIth, XVth, and XIVth. But we again step into the broad daylight -of monumental facts when we reach the XIIIth dynasty, and with it -the 'Old Empire' in the land of KHAM, Ham, the venerable _Chemnus_, -the Sebakhetps and Hepherhetps of the XIIIth dynasty; whilst the -glories of the XIIth blaze forth effulgently, thanks to the critical -investigations of the _Turin Papyrus_ by the immortal Lepsius. - -The XIIth dynasty ends about 2124 B.C. - -Though little is known of the XIth, Xth, IXth, VIIIth, and VIIth -dynasties, the VIth and Vth dynasties stand solid as rocks on the -_Turin_ papyrus, and are thoroughly known in consequence of the -recovery of all the kings, but one, from the tombs opened at Memphis. -The remains of the IVth dynasty surpass belief; those who doubt can -refer to the folio plates, the 'Denkmaeler,' by Lepsius, copies of which -are in nearly all our libraries. - -Of the IIIrd, IInd, and Ist dynasties we have no monuments, but -even this unknown age must have been preceded by a long period of -development, till at last MENES is set down as the first Pharaoh of -Egypt about 3892 B.C. according to Lepsius, or 5702 B.C. according -to Boeckh; 5613 B.C. according to Unger; Brugsch puts him 4455 B.C.; -Lauth 4157 B.C., and Bunsen 3623 B.C. But before Menes constructed -Memphis; Teni, This, or Thinis, was already a once flourishing and -then decaying town. Menes erected at Memphis a green sanctuary, -ornamented with the figures of men and animals. Memphis (Men-ofer) -means 'the good station.' The king in the times of Menes had already -several titles. He was called the great house--_Per-ao_, Pharaoh; as -we speak of the 'sublime Porte.' The king was to his subjects _nuter_ -(divine), or _neb_ (master). He was addressed by the title of _hon-f_, -corresponding to our 'Your Majesty'; or only by _on_, which would be -our 'Sire.' The Egyptians under Menes had already rewards in the form -of decorations, in _nub_, the golden collar, corresponding to our -'order of the garter.' The court consisted of nobles and attendants. -The nobles were _Sez_, and had to distinguish themselves by wisdom and -learning. The house of the king's children was under a governor, who -was responsible for their health and education. Those belonging to the -highest classes had the title of _erpa_, illustrious, _ha_, chief, or -_set_, your excellency. The affairs of the court were entrusted to -intendants, the _hir-sesta_, the secretary and numerous scribes. The -king 3000 or 5000 years B.C. had a quartermaster-general; a director -of vocal music; a director of amusements; a chief of the chamber of -the robes; a chief hair-dresser; a master of trimming the nails of -H.M., and a superintendent of the baths. Inferior court-officials -were intrusted with the supervision of the granaries, the fruit and -oil-chambers; there were royal purveyors of meat, royal bakers, and -equerries. Architects, who were held in the very highest honour, -because they could marry the daughters of the king, had to inspect the -public works. Judges administered the law, already divided into a civil -and criminal section. The title _hir-sesta_ meant 'he who is above a -secret,' There was a hir-sesta of heaven (the royal astronomer), one -of 'secret words,' a kind of private secretary, who had to compose -important political or social essays; another of grammar. The scribes -again were divided into different classes. They had to transmit orders -from their superiors; to register dry facts; to keep accounts. The very -titles of these court-officials are enough to convince us that at the -time of Menes, Egypt must have already possessed a highly-complicated -and civilised State-organisation. - -The successor of Menes, Atos or Akotus, is recorded to have written -'books on Anatomy,' and constructed the royal palace of Memphis. - -This was the state of Egypt under _Menes_. His name suggests a more -than merely accidental analogy with _Manu_, _Minos_, or _Man_, and -has reference to the time when _man_ became conscious of law, and -assembled into a social bondship. The Egyptians, before a Menes could -have ruled over them, must have gone through the savage and nomadic, -or pastoral stages, and have passed from the palaeolithic, neolithic, -and bronze ages of art into that of iron. When did they invent their -_hieroglyphs_, which must first have been _ideographic_ before they -became _phonetic_? From the first-recorded meeting between the -Hebrews, then still nomads, and the Egyptians, it appears that the -latter already then formed a well-organised State-body. As regards -their monuments, we see them enter the mythical age with their grand -stone-constructions, their pyramids, colosses, temples, palaces, -sphinxes, catacombs and obelisks, as a developed artistic nation. All -these stupendous works are constructed for eternity; there is nothing -nomadic in them, though this element here and there shows itself in -colossal petrifactions. Wood-constructions and textile fabrics form -the bases of their ornamentation, but this influence must have taken -effect in antediluvian, nay, even pre-Adamitic, times, when humanity -everywhere else was sunk in a state of unconscious inactivity. The -mound, constructed with geometrical accuracy as a huge pyramid, must -have had an origin somewhere. The construction itself has a purpose. -The crystal form surrounds an inner kernel, around which the stone -shell is laid; it not only serves to point upwards, but also downwards. -Thus mortality and immortality are already blended into one in these -hoary monuments. - -To proclaim the grandeur of the silent inhabitant, once a mighty ruler, -to the four quarters of the globe, was the purpose of these pyramids. - -Natural caves must have suggested their tombs and catacombs. The sacred -Nile with its majestic flow is reflected in the endless horizontal -lines of their temples. The rising peaks of mountains seem to have -suggested their huge pylons. The rays of the sun were transformed by -them into stones, recording, as gigantic obelisks, the deeds of their -kings. When did these obelisks shake off the rough shape of mere -huge monoliths, placed in plains to commemorate some grand event? -To point upwards in isolated forms was the secret tendency of these -half-sculptured, half-architectural marvels. Trees and forests were -turned by the Egyptian artists into hypostyle halls, with innumerable -columns, spreading a mysterious gloom about them. - -The Chinese were practical; the Trans-Himalayans metaphysical; the -Cis-Himalayans agricultural, commercial and warlike; and the Egyptians -pre-eminently architectural and _monumental_. - -Their whole historical life may be divided into the following -art-periods. - - _(a)_ The Ante-monumental. - _(b)_ The Pyramidal. - _(c)_ The Hieratic. - _(d)_ The Ptolemaic. - -A. These four epochs of art-development resemble layers in the -earth's crust. Whilst with other nations the remnants of art are mere -skeletons, colourless frames of an extinct social organism, with the -Egyptians we have art in all its different phases, with the dried flesh -and the scarcely-faded colours, embalmed like a mummy. Life and death -were with them so closely allied, that we may say, their life was a -continual death, and their death was everlasting life. - -The spiritual conceptions of the Egyptians, which might have served -to enable us to understand their art thoroughly, were lost with their -sacred books, of which, with one exception, we have merely the titles. -Plato considered them 10,000 years old in his time. They consisted of:-- - -1. The _two_ books of the Chanter--like the Vedas and the Zend-Avesta -containing hymns in honour of the gods, and a code of laws like those -of Manu. - -2. The _four_ astronomical books of the Horoskopus; treating of fixed -stars, and of solar and lunar conjunctions, making the sun the centre, -round which we revolve. - -3. The _ten_ books of the Hierogrammatist, or the Sacred Scribe, -treating of the art of writing, which was: hieroglyphic (sacred), -hieratic (a kind of hieroglyphic tachygraphy--short-hand writing, used -by priests only), and enchorial or demotic, used by the people. These -books contained, further, the elements of cosmography and geography; -tablets, on which the high-roads of the earth were marked; astronomical -records, mentioning, according to Diogenes Laertius, 373 solar and -832 lunar eclipses, referring thus to a period of 48,863 years; a -chorography of Egypt, and the delineation of the course of the sacred -Nile; an inventory of each temple, of the landed property of the -priests, and a treatise on weights and measures. - -4. The _ten_ ceremonial books of the Stolists, which were entirely -devoted to religious worship, containing the ordinances as to '_the -first-fruits, and the sacrificial stamp, sacrifices, prayers, -processions_,' and the like. No human sacrifices were offered up from -at least 3000 years B.C. - -5. The _ten_ books of the prophets, consisting of thirty-six sections, -called the hieratic writings, with which the prophets, the first -order of the priests, were entrusted. A description of the deities, -regulations for the education of the priests, and general laws formed -their contents. - -The oldest books of law, were attributed to _Hermes_ (Toth), implying, -that the first germ of an hierarchical organisation of society sprung -from the sacred songs, and that law was entirely based upon the -religious conceptions of the secret forces of nature by which man -had been impressed. Like the Code of Manu, which took its origin in -the Vedas, or the Laws of Zoroaster based on the Zend-Avesta, or the -injunctions of Confucius founded on the holy records and songs of -by-gone ages, the Egyptian laws took their origin in the first poetical -feelings of awakened humanity, excited by the mysteries of nature under -the rule of an incomprehensible first cause. - -6. The _six_ books of the Dead. The only books still extant, written -in hieroglyphs, and divided by Lepsius into 165 sections. The first -fifteen chapters form a distinct and connected whole, with the -superscription: 'Here begin the Sections of the glorification in the -Light of Osiris.' - -It concludes with a book entitled 'The Book of Deliverance in the Hall -of the _twofold_ Justice (Reward and Punishment), and the Book of -Redemption.' - -With such a deep and mystic literature, encompassing the gods, nature, -and man, in life and death, it is no wonder that a mystic and symbolic -art should have succeeded in Egypt. - -Their mythology was not less profound than that of the -Trans-Himalayans; there was more of symmetry, at least architectural -symmetry, in their conceptions and representations than in those of the -Brahmans, though Egyptian priests and Brahmans have apparently taken -their conceptions from one and the same source. The Egyptian had eight -gods of the first order, twelve gods of the second, and seven gods of -the third order, pointing by these very numbers to an astronomical -basis, thus:-- - -1. The cosmical forces of creative nature. - -2. The twelve months of the year. - -3. The seven days of the week. - -Astronomy is the first powerful divisor of time and the supreme lord -of agriculture. Only when the 'Sacred Nile' deposited its fructifying -alluvium on the barren limestone of the valleys, formed by the Libyan -and Arabian mountain ranges, man could exist and develop in that -region. The regular inundation appeared to have taken place under the -influence of the sun, moon, and stars. The sun (Osiris) was, therefore, -believed to call forth the Nile (Isis) from regions _unknown down to -our own days_, and sun and water became, as with the Indians (_Indra -and Agni_), the first visible, creative forces of nature. - -The eight gods of the first order were:-- - -I. AMN (Brahm), Am-Ra, Ammon, the Greek Zeus (the son of Kronos and -Rhea), the Roman Jupiter; the 'Concealed God,' the 'Lord of Heaven,' -the 'Lord of Thrones'; the first creative, incomprehensible, invisible -force of the universe. The Brahma of the Indians, the Zeruane-Akerene -of the Persians. - -II. KHEM (Kama), the generative God of Nature, Brahma. He was -worshipped, under the _second Thinite Dynasty_, under the symbol of the -goat. The primitive, _active_, or male element of nature. - -III. MUT ({maia}, matter, Demeter, Leto, Latona, Bhavani), the -primitive, _passive_, or female element of nature. - -IV. NUM (Nu, Kneph, ChNUbis, the Indian VischNU, Noah, Neptun). -In Arabic _nef_ means to breathe. The breath of the universe when -condensed--'water;' the creative spirit, the {Agathodaimon}; the -{pneuma} (the wind, the air) of the Greeks. - -V. SETI (in Koptic Sate), the ray, the arrow; at a later period -the frog-headed goddess, the consort of Kneph; the sun-beam, the -fructifying heat in union with water (cosmical moisture), producing the -inner force of creation. - -VI. PHTAH (Ptah, Phthah, S'iva, Vulcan), the creator of the world, -which sprang from the mouth of Kneph, meaning at his bidding. His -symbol became at a later period the scarabaeus. The more numerous this -animal was in the Nile valley after the subsidence of the inundation, -the more fruitful was the year. Phtah was in reality telluric heat. - -VII. NET (Neith, Athene, Pallas, Minerva, Doorga), the bright goddess -of intellectual power, wisdom, knowledge, virtue, passionless -happiness. Isis was her substitute. Her temple at Sais had no roof, but -was vaulted over by the sunny or starry canopy of heaven, and bore the -mysterious inscription: 'I am all that was, and is, and is to be; no -mortal has lifted up my veil, and the fruit I bore is Helios.' Past, -present, and future, are mysteriously entwined in the conception of -intellect, pervading and ruling the universe. - -VIII. RA (Helios, Apollo, Adonis, Adonais, the Lord, Baal, Mithras, -Moloch, Teotl, Toth, Hermes, Odin, Thor, Atys, Janus, Kekrops, -Endymion, &c.), the sun, the reflected light (with the Cabalists -_Hachoser_, in opposition to the expanding light, _Hajashor_). - -The representations of these divinities were not monstrous, like -those of the Indians; the human form predominates, but the _symbolic_ -is still the most important element. The outward form has an inward, -secret meaning. 'Meaning' and 'meant' are still in wild conflict. The -sublime forces of the deity were to be hewn in stone, or given in -outlines, or painted; the result was a grotesque product of art, and as -such a complete failure. - -The twelve gods of the second order were the children of four of the -gods of the first order. - -I. AMN had only one son, Khunsu (Chous, Chaos, the prototype of -Herkules). - -II. KNEPH had also only one son, Teth (Toth, Thoth, Hermes), who taught -men to write and to read. - -III. PHTAH had two children, Atumu (Atum, Atmu), and Pecht, the -cat-headed goddess of Bubastis (the Greek Artemis or Diana). - -IV. RA had eight children, Hat-her (Athyr, Athor, Aphrodite); Mau -(Jao); Ma (Truth); Tefun (the lion-headed goddess); Muntu (Mant); Sebak -(Sebek), the crocodile-headed god; Seb (Kronos), and Nutpe (Rhea). - -The seven gods of the third order, emanations from those of the second, -as these were emanations from those of the first, were:-- - -1. Set, Nubi, or Typhon, celebrated for his struggle with Horus, the -son of Osiris, in the infernal regions. (See what is said of Krishna, -p. 70.) - -2. Hesiri, Osiris (also the solar year), HSR. - -3. Hes or Isis, HS, the Nile, the moon (the lunar year). - -4. Nebt-hi or Nephthys, the sister of Isis; sister and wife of Typhon. - -5. Her-Her (Aroeris, Arueris). - -6. Her (Horus, the child of Osiris and Isis, Harpokrates), who, with -Isis and Osiris, formed the great, incomprehensible, mystic trinity of -the Egyptians, of which we have the following record:-- - -OSIRIS was the father, husband, brother, and son of ISIS. - -ISIS was the mother, wife, sister, and daughter of OSIRIS. - -HORUS was the brother and son of Osiris and Isis, and was OSIRIS -himself. - -7. Anubis (Anupo) the dog-star. - -Who does not understand at once that, out of these half-astronomical, -half-cosmogonical conceptions, a religion and art full of mysticism, -blending into one _Fetishism_, _Astrology_, and _Anthropomorphism_, -must have grown? Only through a careful study of Egyptian mythology are -we enabled to comprehend that gigantic power which urged the people to -construct those temples and palaces, those labyrinths and catacombs, -as mystic in themselves, as the hidden powers of nature. The masses in -Egypt were kept in a degraded state of passive obedience; they were -overawed by metaphysical subtleties, and by huge stone monsters, which -filled them with horror, and made them subservient to the dictates of -a gloomy priesthood. Religion and art, both supported by a vast store -of natural science, were the exclusive property of the priests, of -whom the Pharaoh was the merely _tolerated_ head, a kind of stone idol -in the flesh. Egyptian art was an echo of priestly caprices, which, -wrapt in symbolism, had a powerful hold on the untutored minds of the -people. Careful investigations have proved that these priests were of a -different race to the aborigines; their mythological analogies point to -immigrated Brahmans, who brought some religious notions with them from -the Ganges, and transferred them to the Nile. - -Egyptian art reflects in every form the gorgeous influences of -religion. The whole life of every Egyptian was placed, in seven phases, -under the protection of seven divinities. The _first_ period of man's -life was under the influence of _Isis_, the moon (Luna, Selene). The -_second_ was devoted to _Hermes_; during this period man had to learn -to read and to write, to play the harp, to dance, to develop the -body in the gymnasium, and to make himself well versed in knowledge -according to his station in life; but the only station that granted -man an insight into knowledge was that of the _priest_. During the -_third_ period man was under the care of _Hat-her_ (Athyr), or Venus. -Love was to rule the youth; the world was to appear to him in the -rosy hue of a mystic foam of incomprehensible longing. The _fourth_ -period was under the dominion of _Ra_ (Helios); when love had ceased -to disturb the mind, and to fill this world with illusions, the light -of truth and earnest activity was to ripen man, and to prepare him for -the _fifth_ period, under the protection of _Man_ or Mars, the God of -War; man was to learn either to conquer others, or to conquer his own -passions, and to work in the State as a useful member. Few only reached -the _sixth_ period, guided by _Amn_, the supreme representative of -abstract wisdom; during this period man was admitted to act as a judge, -to sit at the board of a hierarchical council, or to teach priests -as high-priest. At last man became, during the _seventh_ period, -vapour--breath--air--under the dominion of _Num_ (Kneph), and was -detached from reality; if good, transferred into a state of ideality; -if not, doomed to begin life anew as a loathsome animal, till he atoned -for his evil deeds, and, purified, reached the bright abode of Osiris. - -B. The _pyramidal period_, the most ancient of Egyptian art, is the -outgrowth of these mystic religious conceptions. Nature was to be -reproduced, and surpassed in her sublime grandeur. The mountain was -brought into a geometrical shape. - -The three principal pyramids were built during the reign of the fourth -dynasty, 3426 B.C.-3220 B.C.; the first, by Shufu (Cheops), was, in -extent, 13 acres 1 rood and 22 perches, more than twice the area of St. -Peter's at Rome. The original quantity of masonry was 89,028,000 cubic -feet. Total height 480 feet; 16 feet higher than St. Peter's, and 120 -feet higher than St. Paul's (London); 360,000 human beings worked at it -for twenty years. The stones are from 9 to 12 feet in length, and 6-1/2 -to 8 feet in breadth. The second pyramid was smaller, built by Shafra -(Chephren), only 454 feet high; and the third by Menkare (Mykerinus), -218 feet high. The mode of fitting the polished stones together is a -perfect master-piece of architectural construction. - -Osiris was to be worshipped in all halls of festival, in all creation, -in all places. Temples were erected in honour of the gods, which were -approached through avenues of sphinxes. These sphinxes were of six -different kinds. 1. The pure lion (symbol of Amn). 2. The lion with -the ram's head (Krio-sphinx--symbol of Khem or Amn). 3. The lion with -hawk's head (symbol of Ra). 4. The lion with a male human head (the -symbol of Osiris or Horus). 5. The lion with a female human head (the -symbol of Mut or Isis). 6. The lion's half-body and legs, with female -human head and arms, as in the reliefs of Karnack, and on the Campesian -obelisk (probably the symbol of Net). - -The tombs were, more or less deeply, hewn into rocks. They generally -begin with a small sanctuary, from which an inclined passage leads -down into the sepulchral chamber. The decoration is an imitation of -wooden trellis-work in very gay colours. The threshold also distinctly -bears the traces of a primitive wood construction; a round, trunk-like -beam generally unites the two door-posts, and even the ceilings of the -apartments are repeatedly made in imitation of wooden boards fastened -together. The pillars are square, and united either by a rectangular -architrave or by circular beams. - -The temples point, by their forms, to a civilisation which took its -course from south to north. This bears out the theory that Meroe was -once the seat of a colony of priests, who spread religion, and with -it science and art, from Upper into Lower Egypt. Thebes appears to -have been the most ancient seat of the Egyptian Pharaohs, one of the -first of whom was perhaps Osiris, though he has been placed amongst -the gods, and was said to have been, like Krishna, an incarnation of -the Supreme Being, who revealed himself in love and kindness, and was -to put an end to the dominion of Typhon, the Eternal Evil. Might not -this myth conceal some historical fact--the advent of a wise hero, who -conquers a wild and reckless tyrant? For Osiris had to go through all -the sufferings of humanity, and even to suffer death, so as to become -the saviour, the deliverer of his people; and then only was he able -to turn the earth into a powerful kingdom. By _Earth_, we may assume, -Upper Egypt was meant, where the god-man Osiris presided, who, in spite -of his having become man, and belonging to the third order of the -gods, was placed on an equality with the gods of the first order. The -temple or tomb of Ipsambul may be considered the very oldest rock-hewn -construction; it has a figure of Osiris twenty feet high over the -entrance door. We pass over the remains of Philae, Elephantine, and -Edfou, and come to those of Karnac and Luxor, the venerable Thebes, -which, in the fifth century B.C., during the times of Herodotus, were -already in a state of dilapidation. - -Upon extensive brick terraces, raised high above the flat banks of the -Nile, the Egyptian temple stood, a strictly secluded building. Strong -walls, rising in pyramidal form, crowned with an overhanging fluted -cornice, gave the mural enclosure a mysterious and stern character. No -opening for windows, no colonnade interrupted the monotonous flatness, -which is covered, as by one long tapestry, with hieroglyphs, and -representations of gods and Pharaohs. The entrance to these buildings, -like that of the temple of Edfou, was placed between two tower-like -structures called propylaea, the walls of which were decorated with -sculptured figures--in three or more rows. Then followed a court, -surrounded by pillars, placed at a distance from the walls on both -sides, roofed over with stone, and forming a gallery. Thence we reach -the pronaos or portico, after which we enter the cell, divided into -the naos and adytum. The naos was generally a kind of hypostyle hall, -with a flat roof raised in the middle. The pillars and columns had a -variety of capitals, but these were generally of one pattern throughout -the temple. The quadrilateral Isis-headed capital, as at Denderah, -was often used. The monuments of the 'hundred-gated' Thebes are the -best school for the study of genuine Egyptian art. The temples on the -eastern side of the river are symbolical of the dawn of life; on the -western side we find tombs, catacombs, and Memnoniums. At Karnac we -have one of the grandest constructions of the world in the ruins of -the hypostyle hall, with its gigantic stone ceiling supported by 134 -columns, of which the twelve middle ones, about 65 feet high and 11 -feet in diameter, are larger and taller than the others, supporting a -loftier central nave. The width of this hall is 338 feet, the depth -170-1/2 feet, and the area 57,629 feet, or about five times as large -as the church of St. Martin-in-the-Fields in London. Columns and walls -are completely covered with sculptured forms of deities; Osiris -predominates. Pylons, propylaea, obelisks, colossal statues of red, -grey, and black granite cover the courts; chapel-like apartments, -connected and unconnected, are strangely intermingled. - -Next to the temples we must mention one of the most gorgeous buildings, -the _Labyrinth_, containing between three and four thousand chambers -in rows, facing inwards the winding alleys, which ascended in a spiral -line to the middle, and descended from it in the same way. It has -been minutely described by Herodotus, Pomponius Mela, Pliny, and -Ezekiel. The building was to be a strict architectural imitation of the -planetary system. The inner 1,500 chambers were divided into twelve -courtyards, corresponding to the twelve signs of the zodiac, six of -which were towards the north, and six towards the south. - -The Memnons were monolith statues of imposing size, symbolic of -the rising sun--of Horus or Osiris. Homer mentions Memnon, for his -remarkable beauty, as the son of the east. Diodorus speaks of him -as Tithonus, a general, sent out to aid Priamus of Troy against the -besieging Greeks. - -The walls of temples, palaces, tombs, and catacombs were partly -decorated with reliefs _en creux_, and partly with tapestry-like -patterns, using geometrical figures, sometimes, though rarely, -intermixed with plants, or plants treated with conventional stiffness. -The walls with the Egyptians had a different purpose than merely to -encircle or to enclose; they served as huge blackboards of stone, on -which the priests wrote their mystic records. The superfluous thickness -of the walls suggests that they were once made of brick, like those -of Nineveh or Babylon, and, further, the overlaying of these immense -granite blocks with stucco, serves to bear out this supposition. The -walls of the enclosures of temples and the sarcophagi were covered -with hieroglyphs or scenes from life, both on the inside and outside; -tombs and catacombs were decorated on the inside only. These scenes -are framed in with borders, reminding us of the broad seams in woven -stuffs. In temples the scenes refer to burial rituals, or the judgment -of the dead; in palaces to hunts and conquests of the kings. We see the -Asian and African conquests of Ramses II. represented on the walls of -Ipsambul (Aboosimbal in Nubia) in bright-coloured pictures. The king -brandishes a pole-axe over the heads of Negroes, Hebrews, and Aryans, -that is, over one mixed and two pure groups of mankind. Above his head -runs the hieroglyphic scroll: 'The beneficent living God, guardian of -glory, smites the South; puts to flight the East; rules by victory, -and drags to his country all the earth, and all foreign lands.' High -officials and private persons ornamented the walls of their houses -and tombs with scenes of every-day occurrences. We may study in these -their whole domestic and public life, their customs and manners, their -amusements and toils. The ceilings of the chambers are not covered -with _symbolic_ pictures, but generally with patterns of conventional -wall-decorations. In temples they are sometimes decorated with zodiacs, -as at Denderah--the best-preserved Egyptian temple, of which, however, -the date is doubtful. - -C. The _hieratic style_ of the Pharaohs substituted a greater amount of -very tasteful symbolic ornamentation. - -The Hathor-masks, the names of kings in cartouches, the viper as a -symbol of divine or royal power; serpents, scarabaei, winged globes, -either symbolic of the sun, the moon, or the earth, formed the -principal elements of the innumerable variety of severe ornamentation. -In addition to these the following were used:-- - -1. The papyrus, as the symbol of bodily and intellectual food. - -2. The lotus, as a symbol of the creative mysteries of the universe. - -3. The palm-tree, with its graceful and simple form, served as the -prototype of their columns, the capitals of which were either open or -closed lotus-buds or flowers. - -4. Lastly, the feather ornament, as the emblem of sovereignty. - -The columns during the _pyramidal_, or old style expressed with -distinct clearness their purpose to serve as a support; in the -_hieratic_, or new style this purpose is detached from the outer form -of the column, which no longer has to support, but merely to serve -as an ornament, or to proclaim some mysterious tenet in symbolic -types. The face of Isis is to look to the four quarters of the globe; -the closed or open lotus to symbolise the mystery of creation, the -fountain of life, the cup of plenty, and the fount of all blessings. -In this treatment they went so far as to imitate the very dew-drops -on the lotus, in granite. A strict naturalism was the foundation of -all Egyptian conventionalism, and in many instances they succeeded in -producing perfectly astonishing effects. In their columns we recognise -the very plant which must have suggested the forms. When made circular -and of granite, these columns still retained the triangular shape of -the papyrus by means of three raised lines on the round surface. At a -later period they were fluted, and apparently tied together under the -capital with a strap, cord, or band of a broad fibrous substance; the -capital above rose in four divisions in the form of a closed lotus. -In the hieratic style the fluting of the columns disappears--they -are smooth, round, and covered with hieroglyphs, but the base still -discloses the plant origin, disguised in an ornament of palm or reed -leaves. Characteristic in these columns is the expression of tension -in the swelling shaft, which was probably an unconscious imitation of -wood-construction; the heavy cross-beams pressing on the thin posts -produced this effect, which has been slavishly copied in stone. With -the Greeks this swelling of the column became one of the elements of -its beauty, because with them it was an abstraction of symmetrical -proportion, consciously done, to express the conflicting powers of -pressure and resistance. With a proud obstinacy the Egyptians, during -their hieratic period, insisted on separating the ornamental from the -architectural part of the building, so that no organic connection -existed between sculpture and architecture. This is most striking -in those colossal sitting figures which are placed in the front and -at the back of propylaea, or before the walls of pylons. It is a -clear separation of matter and spirit, of purpose and form, which is -altogether contrary to the fundamental principles of good architecture. - -Art with the Egyptians was thoroughly _polychromatic_; they tinted -granite, of whatever colour, with a red pigment, so that the stone -might have its proper divine colour, hallowed by the priests. They -coloured in flat tints, and used no shading or shadow; they had, -however, no difficulty in conveying to the mind the original forms -which they intended to copy. _Priestly canons_ regulated the size, -form, colour, and expression of every statue, and every attribute -had its prescribed form, the meaning of which was concealed from the -artist, turning him into a mere unconscious machine, a tool in priestly -hands. This is the reason why their works of art look monotonous, -and everything with them is impressed by the crushing influence of -over-regulation. The Typhonic blast of uniformity killed every higher -aspiration in the artist. The human figure had to consist of nineteen -units; the _second finger was that unit_. Squares of this unit were -drawn on the flat, and according to these measurements the human figure -was constructed with geometrical accuracy, looking as flat as possible. -Dreary deserts of religious prejudices, gloomy superstitions, and -childish formalities hindered all progress, and marked their sculpture -and ornamentation with fixed, stereotyped stiffness, until the last -period of their art. - -D. The _Ptolemaic_ style began to develop a little more life and taste. -The statues did not look as if cast in a general mould; the gods were -allowed to have their feet asunder, the one in advance of the other, -which gave them some appearance of motion. How taste may be degraded -by prejudice and custom, can be seen in the fact, that when this -innovation in Egyptian art was settled by a general law of the Pharaoh, -with the connivance of the high ceremonial courts, the masses, on -seeing their gods with legs apart, as if ready to walk, rushed from all -sides with strong ropes, and tied the divinities to their pedestals, -horrified at the possibility of their leaving the country altogether. -And the gods did leave the country. Anything based on superstition -or prejudice, anything having for its vivifying element symbolism or -mysticism, must die away in time. - -What we said of Indian art holds good of Egyptian forms. Take away -from the Uraeus, the lotus, papyrus, palm, crocodile, cat, and bull -their symbolic meaning, and these elements of ornamentation lose their -vitality. The Greeks, and more especially the Romans, have shown us how -we may use some of their patterns to advantage: how an entrance hall -may be decorated with silent and mournful-looking sphinxes, and what -an unsurpassed charm there is in the obelisk, directing the thought -upwards. A pyramid still remains one of the finest monuments for one -who has filled the four quarters of the globe with his fame. - -In their every-day ornaments, rings, bracelets, necklaces, head-dresses -and furniture, the architectural straight lines prevail; variety is -not much required, the forms as well as the patterns must be the -same. Just as we reproduce horse-shoe upon horse-shoe because they -bring 'luck,' the Egyptian jeweller reproduced the scarabaeus, and -the Turin Museum has not less than 180 different kinds of scarabaei. -In their architecture they suffered from one great evil--from a -horror of symmetry. Their grand palaces or temples have no ruling -element; everything is out of proportion, and though in their detailed -ornamentation they were symmetrical, and even eurythmical--the -harmony of purpose is often wanting. The thought of building for -eternity, however, is always present, whilst no one can deny that -in our buildings the ninety years' lease is to be traced in every -corner. The Egyptians tried to represent the forms of monumental -architecture, and they certainly succeeded in reaching the sublime, -but they did this in neglecting the beautiful. Their symmetrophobia, -which many of our architects imitate only too successfully, spoilt -everything. Their weavings were excellent; their wood-constructions, -as far as furniture was concerned, faultless; music was known to them; -they worked gold, and ornamented it in the so-called 'champ-leve' -manner, and were acquainted with enamel 'cloisonne.' They also fixed -thin layers of gold thread on metal, and filled the remaining spaces -with enamel of different colours, which method the ancients called -'encaustum.' Notwithstanding all these advantages Egyptian art never -reached the ideal of beauty; it has only the charm of the _mysterious_ -for us. To keep this sentiment alive is the duty of any modern artist -who wishes to work in the Egyptian style. He must try to convey -some mystic cosmogonical or incomprehensible religious thought in -diapers, and floral ornament, or in the use of animals or the human -frame in outlines, he must place his ideas and forms under a strict -linear canon. He may then succeed in reproducing the artistic forms -of a nation, during a period, in which humanity did not go beyond -the hierarchical in religion, and the practical in art; during which -mankind struggled to find forms, but was prevented from the freer -exercise of its innate artistic force by the dictates of a despotic -priesthood, and was tied with merciless tyranny to monotonous canons, -crushing under the weight of symbolism and mysticism every higher -artistic aspiration. - - - - -CHAPTER VII. - -HEBREW ART. - - -Little, or rather nothing, can properly be said of Hebrew art, for it -is a non-entity. The Hebrews are a mixed race. They assert themselves -to be of the Semitic group of mankind, but ethnologically they are a -composition of black, yellow, and white men, and are closely related -to the Arabs and Phoenicians. They were generally slaves. For 450 -years they were in bondage in Egypt, whence they first emerged into a -national existence. From Moses to Saul, for 450 years, they lived under -a kind of theocratic democracy: God, the supreme ruler in heaven, and -the Jews on earth his _chosen_ people. For another 450 years they had a -kind of theocratic monarchy: God ruled in heaven, as the king ruled on -earth. This period lasted from Saul to Zedekiah, and gives us-- - -(a) A period of 100 years under the first three kings, when -the twelve tribes were yet united; and - -(b) Another period during which they formed two separate -kingdoms. Of these - -(_a_) Israel, in this condition, lasted 220 years under twenty kings, -who ruled at Samaria, and was destroyed by the Assyrians. - -(_b_) Judaea, as a separate State, existed 350 years under twenty-one -kings, and was annihilated by the Babylonians. - -Not less than 650 years intervened between the destruction of Jerusalem -and its second destruction by the Romans. During this period the chosen -people were - -1. 200 years under Persian sway. - -2. 170 years under the dominion of Alexander the Great and his -successors. - -3. 130 years they enjoyed a certain independence under the Maccabees. - -4. 100 years they were ruled by the Herodes and Romans. After the -second destruction of Jerusalem the Jews ceased to have an independent -State of their own, and were scattered all over the earth. They in -reality enjoyed only 550 years of freedom, as a grand and united -nation, out of a period of not less than 6,000 historically-known years. - -Intellect came to absolute consciousness for the first time amongst -the Jews, and in this their historical importance and weight lie. Man, -created in the image of God, lost his state of innocence, absolute -contentment and immortality, by eating of the tree of knowledge. The -Jews were the first to recognise in a higher sense the double nature -of man--his godhead and his animal nature. The country in which they -developed is a perfect geological marvel. The region in which they -settled was divided by a river and a sea. This sea is 1,400 feet -below the level of the Mediterranean. The river flows downwards, like -the Stygian river, far beneath the level of the ocean. The banks of -the Jordan and the lake Asphaltites are the lowest regions of the -habitable globe. In the west the Jews found some fertile plains, but -they never could obtain full and peaceful possession of them, nor of -the sea-coast. They were shut out from the world in a mountainous -region as in a gloomy Puritan chapel, and had ample leisure for -self-contemplation, and for attempting to solve the riddle of man's -destiny with the help of Egyptian wisdom, Persian, Assyrian and -Babylonian theories. Rocks and sand formed the foreground of their -earthly existence; the background was made up by a gloomy river and a -still gloomier sea--the sea of death, the Acherusian, the Plutonian -lake. A sea too low, too mephitic and poisonous for art to exist round -it. A region of sorrow, sinfulness, and abject wretchedness cannot -be the abode of art and science. The fine art of the Jews was like a -migratory bird in its passage over the sea of death. - -Not only with the Jews, but also with the Egyptians, Persians, and -early Greeks, to represent a god in the likeness of man was considered -sinful. The Persians abhorred idols in any shape. The Egyptians gave -their gods shape and form, but a merely symbolic form, expressing in -concrete signs some higher abstract conception. The human head, the -body of a beast or fish, the horns of a ram, or the ears of a cow; the -human leg with the foot of a goat, or the human arm with the claws of a -bird of prey, were sacred, because symbolical. They had a metaphysical -theology written in hieroglyphs. All this was prohibited with the Jews. -They allowed some exceptions, and borrowed the figures of the cherubim -from the Assyrians, the oxen of the temple from the Egyptians, and the -sculptured lions of Solomon's palace from the Persians; their artists -were foreigners, and the imitation of these works was ever after -forbidden. - -'All those things,' says Rabbi Manasseh Ben Israel, one of their most -learned commentators, 'which are esteemed holy in the presence of -God, or idea of man, may not be imitated in any known form or shape, -although made without the intention of adoring them, so as to preclude -the possibility of their being worshipped or deified hereafter. Thus -the figure of the divine chariot, which Ezekiel saw, may not be made, -nor the likeness of angels of any degree, nor of man, for these -creatures are all superior from being made in the image of God.' ... -The prohibition is further applied by him to everything appertaining to -the holy temple, and no house or palace could be built of its size or -proportions. - -Poetry and music were exempt from this enactment. The importance -and influence of the social and religious condition on the -development of art may best be studied in the Jews. They had no great -architects, sculptors or painters, no inventors, no philosophers in -natural science, but many excellent poets, theologians, cabalists, -necromancers, philologists and composers. In our times, however, -influenced by the vivifying spirit of Christianity, they count amongst -themselves, in addition to an inordinate number of picture-dealers, -some creditable painters. - -They possessed legitimately only _one_ temple. Their first temple was -a portable tent. The second was almost entirely of cedar-wood, richly -provided with metallic ornaments, made by artists from Tyre and Sidon. -They possessed one palace, that of Solomon. Babylonian or Assyrian -architecture was probably reflected in this, and we may thus form a dim -idea of what Solomon's palace must have been. First the temple, then -the palace was constructed. - -The fact that the first temple was a mere tent, shows at once the -nomadic character of the Jews, at a period when the Egyptians had -possessed their architectural marvels for thousands of years. To the -student of history, architecture is a sure measure of the degree of -artistic and social development of a nation. We may boldly say, show -us the plans of the houses, palaces, and temples of any nation, and we -can determine the degree of its civilisation; we can do even more, we -can read its character and religious fervour in these wood, brick, -or stone records. That the Jews, having been compelled to witness all -the misery and superstitious dulness which the Egyptian hierarchy and -theocracy produced, should have detested architecture, and looked upon -sculpture or any stone and brick as a curse to humanity, was quite -natural; and that, once escaped from the bondage of Egypt, they should -have hated any monumental, architectural, or artistic sculptural -attempt, is equally obvious. - -The egotistical character of the nomadic trader may be traced in the -architectural constructions of the Jews. Any nation that loves its -god or gods with zeal and self-denial will be sure to build grand -temples to his or their glorification. The Persians had no temples, -because they spiritualised the divine conception to such a degree, -that they thought the first cause present everywhere like light. The -Jews borrowed the same idea, and yet to fix the Eternal Spirit visibly -amongst themselves, they assigned him a permanent abode, where he was -exclusively to dwell; to be near them and to watch over them. Religious -egotism was the mainspring of their national existence, and this -general egotism made every individual Jew an egotist; and egotists are -always bad supporters of anything by which the masses generally may -benefit. Such people look only to the satisfaction of their momentary -wants; they will collect trinkets, earrings, bracelets, armlets, -goblets, gold and silver vessels, but the divine art of architecture, -which binds masses together, will be neglected. We see them at first -contented with a mere tent, and, when they undertook to construct a -lasting building, it was done with all the pomp and gaudiness of a -_parvenu_; they borrowed from all the surrounding rich people anything -they could lay hands upon, merely to be able to say, without reason or -taste--'Look, my special God has also his special house.' In the most -powerful period of their national existence, which was a very short -one, the Jews roused themselves to the construction of at least _one_ -temple to their Javeh. They wished at last to possess an Akropolis like -the Egyptians, who had so many, or the Greeks, Persians, Assyrians and -Babylonians. Their God was at last to be housed, like the gods of the -despised Gentiles. - -The temple of Solomon has been much written upon. Prejudice, religious -fanaticism, blind faith, and unconscious or _voluntary_ ignorance, -dictated the descriptions and guided the reconstructions. Michaelis, -one of the greatest Jewish authorities on Scriptural matters, tells us -that 'all the representations which we possess of the temple of Solomon -are ornamented with arbitrary forms, and if we ask for authority or -proof of this or that ornamental form, we invariably receive the -answer: It must have been so, for I would have built in this way.' It -is naturally very difficult to obtain a correct description of the -temple of Solomon, for with regard to its construction we must rely -on the records of the Jews themselves. Unfortunately the Books of the -Kings, Chronicles, Ezekiel, and the writings of Josephus, the varying -descriptions of the translators, and the host of commentators, who -generally obscure the simplicity of the simplest subject, are all at -variance. - -We may divide Jewish history into the eight following periods. - -During the _first_ period we find them as nomads on the shores of the -Euphrates and Tigris. - -During the _second_ period they were received as shepherds in Egypt -Here they learnt for the first time the arts of a settled people. They -found a mighty hierarchy already established; astronomy, chemistry, -architecture, and sculpture were practised by priests, who were -well-versed theologians, lawyers, physicians, and philosophers. Not -only the Jews, who lived amongst the Egyptians, but also the wisest and -most learned men of Greece, owed much to the land of hidden wisdom, -which was undoubtedly the cradle of the Jewish faith and of Greek -philosophy. Moses, Lykurgus, and Solon sat piously listening to the -oracular instructions of the Egyptian priests, who taught in mystic -symbols. Thales, Pythagoras and Plato borrowed their philosophical -theories and systems largely from the Egyptians. The Egyptians worked -out the incarnation theory with mystic refinement. Osiris, the -concealed Lord of heaven, had to become flesh, to conquer evil. He -condescended to become a redeemer--had to suffer a cruel death in order -to paralyse the influences of Typhon. The Greeks and Jews never could -grasp the mystery of a god changing his almighty subjectivity into an -objective human form, in order to attain, through suffering and death, -what he could have fulfilled in a thousand other ways. Osiris was -not only the supreme ruler in heaven, but he was also the supremely -just and inexorable judge in hell. The division of the universe into -an abode of bliss for the departed just, and of eternal darkness and -fire for the unjust, was an Indian, Persian, and Egyptian dogma. To -the blessed it was promised that they should pluck the sweetest fruits -in heaven, 'for they have given food to the hungry, and water to the -thirsty; they clothed the naked, and lived in truth; for their heart -was with God and God was with them, and they will enjoy eternal life in -his presence,' Of the wicked, on the contrary, it was said: 'that they -could not see the countenance of the Lord of heaven, nor ever hear his -voice; they would go about without heads, drag after them their hearts, -be boiled for ever in a cauldron, be hanged for ever by their legs.' - -From these metaphysical and mystic Egyptians, the immortal Jewish -lawgiver borrowed the division of his nation into twelve tribes, in -imitation of the twelve zodiacal signs, and the division of Egypt into -twelve nomes. In Egypt he learnt to distinguish between clean and -unclean animals; to practise circumcision, which was with the Egyptians -confined to their priests; but Moses promised to make his compatriots -'a nation of priests.' He established the tribe of the Levites, in -imitation of the Egyptian priest-caste; and regulated their income, -mode of living, and duties according to the ten books of the prophets -(see p. 112); he divided the priests into four different classes, which -at a later period were called _Peshat_, exegists, _Remes_, expounders -of dubious points, _Derush_, composers of homilies, and _Sod_, the -hierophants, or those versed in the real mysteries. The initials of the -four names are taken from the Persian word PRDS (paradise) which may be -adduced to prove that what Moses originally instituted was worked out, -and systematised, at a later period, under Persian influence. The whole -arrangement of the tabernacle was Egyptian; the serpent-worship was -Egyptian, and so was the idolatrous predilection for the golden calf. -Moses in his wise gratitude forbade the Jews ever to be hostile to the -Egyptians. - -During the _third_ period they left Egypt, and though they were -acquainted with all the smaller arts of their Egyptian task-masters, -and knew how to weave, to cut stones, to model, to cast, and to found -gold and silver, they had to seek and to gain by hard fighting a new -home to settle in. During this period they forgot everything; their -accomplishments were gone when they settled in the Holy Land. For -during times of war the growth of sciences and arts was never fostered. - -During the _fourth_ period they reached the very climax of their -national glory. David became master of a large empire which extended -from the shores of the Euphrates to the frontiers of Egypt; this -expansion was accomplished by the force of arms. His successor Solomon -administered and consolidated the empire, founded on blood and iron, -by wisdom and the culture of the arts of peace. After a Caesar, the -Jews had an Augustus. Solomon lived in friendship and peace with the -surrounding mighty kingdoms, especially with Hiram, King of Tyre. It -was Solomon who began to build Tadmor (afterwards Palmyra, the queen of -the East), to establish in the desert a common emporium for Phoenician -wares, and to enable the Jews to trade with them. - -During the _fifth_ period the vast empire was divided into two parts, -the one of which was altogether annihilated, and the other fell into -the hands of the Babylonians, and the temple of Solomon was destroyed. -Slaves and captives are rarely good artists. - -During the _sixth_ period, after Kyrus had freed the Jews and permitted -them to return to their native country, their national position -improved. Under Darius, Zorobabel received permission to reconstruct -the temple of Solomon on the foundations of the one erected by that -wise king, and it was accordingly rebuilt, but this could only be done -in accordance with the impoverished condition of freed captives. - -During the _seventh_ period, under Alexander the Great and his -followers, the Jews, attacked by Persians, Egyptians, and Syrians, -showed that they could rise to the very highest deeds of heroism and -self-sacrifice. - -Finally, during the _eighth_ period, under the Romans, they gave up all -hope of maintaining their position as a chosen people; they revolted -sometimes, but more for theological than political reasons. Pompey -treated them with great kindness and consideration after the capture of -Jerusalem. During the reign of Augustus the town attained a grandeur -and extension which it had never possessed, even in its brightest -days under the sway of Solomon. But stubborn and arrogant as the Jews -always were in times of prosperity, though enjoying a certain amount of -freedom, they revolted, and the town and temple were destroyed. Nothing -was left but the candlestick with seven branches, symbolic with the -Egyptians of the seven planets, and with the Jews of seven archangels, -or of the seven days of the week, sculptured in marble on the Arch -of Titus, together with a facsimile of the holy ark, and some of the -trumpets, used in religious ceremonies. It would be most interesting if -the original relics, which it is assumed are buried in the Tiber, could -be recovered; and, as so many venerable relics of by-gone ages have -been brought to light, we do not despair of once seeing these remains. - -The tabernacle, or earliest temple of the Jews, was entirely -constructed on the plan of an Egyptian temple. To convince ourselves -of this truth we need only compare its plan with that of the temple at -Edfou. The triple division into a Pronaos, Naos, and Adytum, or the -Holy of Holies, was strictly observed in both. The Adytum was a cube -10 cubits, or 15 feet each way; an outer temple, as Naos, consisted -of two such cubes, 15 feet broad by 30 feet long. Adytum and Naos -were covered by a sloping roof, which projected 5 cubits (7-1/2 feet) in -every direction beyond the temple itself, making the whole 40 cubits, -or 60 feet, in length, by 20 cubits, or 30 feet, in width. Adytum -and Naos stood in an enclosure--the Pronaos, 100 cubits (150 feet) -long, by 50 cubits (75 feet) broad. From Moses to Solomon, for 600 -years, this tabernacle was the only temple of the Jews. When Solomon -began to construct the temple, he adhered strictly to the above -arrangement, only doubling all the dimensions. The temple partook more -of the character of a square shrine, or a store-house intended to -contain precious works in metal; a kind of opisthodomos. The principal -ornaments were two brazen pillars, Jachin and Boaz (sun and moon), -by the skilful Hiram of Tyre. They were said to have been marvels of -metal-work. The pillars of Susan or Persepolis, which had capitals -of the same relative proportions, may give us some idea of these. In -Egyptian temples it was also usual to place propyleae at the porch of -a temple, and the same custom prevailed with the Phoenicians, as in the -case of the celebrated Venus (Astarte or Astharote) shrine at Paphos. -After the construction of the temple by Solomon, Jerusalem became the -holy and exclusive central point of Judaism. There only, and nowhere -else, did they allow their God to be present. Zorobabel erected on -the very spot another altar and temple in the same spirit, and this -is the reason why the erection of a second temple at Heliopolis by -Onias, under the Ptolemaeians, caused such animosity and jealousy -amongst Egyptian and Judaic Jews. It is said that the necessary marble, -wood, and stone, and also the gold, silver, and brass vessels had -already been weighed and prepared for the construction of the temple -during the reign of King David, who gave his son the plan of the -whole architectural construction. According to Chronicles, however, -it appears that David made little or no preparation, and that Solomon -only found some of the brass-work ready for use. This latter assertion -is clearly verified by the correspondence between Solomon and Hiram. -Solomon asks for wood for building in general, as also cedars and -cypress trees from Mount Lebanon; adding that he wishes that Sidonians, -as experienced carpenters, should help his own workmen, whom he -designates as less able. This does not say very much in favour of the -artistic skill of the Jews, who at the period of Solomon's reign had -not yet attained the same degree of proficiency as the pre-historic -constructors of pile-dwellings. The request of Solomon was granted by -the King of Tyre, and Adoniram was sent as foreman of the Sidonian -carpenters, of whom 30,000 were appointed by Solomon; 10,000 of these -worked alternately from month to month. Besides the 30,000 carpenters, -there were 80,000 sculptors, or rather stone-cutters and masons, and -70,000 journeymen, making altogether 180,000 working men, under 3,300 -overseers, employed in the construction of the temple, all tributary -_strangers_ whom David had conquered. The construction began 592 years -after Exodus, about 975 years B.C. Mount Moreah, or Moriah, was the -site chosen, and the temple was completed in _seven_ years. The inner -temple was 60 cubits (90 feet) long, 20 cubits (30 feet) broad, and 30 -cubits (45 feet) high. Josephus says it was 120 cubits (180 feet) high; -this would make the edifice resemble a square tower. The Pronaos may -have been 120 cubits high. The space, 60 cubits long and 20 broad, was -separated into two divisions. Of these the rear was 20 cubits square, -forming the Holy of Holies, the 'sekos' of the Egyptian temples. The -other division, 40 by 10, formed the Naos, the holy place, which was -preceded by a hall, the Pronaos. The division: One God, one priesthood, -and one people, was thus expressed. Rooms were constructed round the -temple three stories high, corresponding to the rooms in the Egyptian -Labyrinth, and the Brahmanic and Buddhistic choultries, or cloisters. -There were thirty rooms on each floor. The height of the temple having -been 30 cubits, this would give 15 feet for each story, walls included. -Josephus doubles all these dimensions, and adopts inconceivable -measurements. The ninety rooms were used as receptacles for the sacred -vessels, and the temple was thus literally a holy treasury. The Holy -of Holies having been only 20 cubits high, a space of 10 cubits, or -15 feet, would have been left above it; of this room no intelligible -mention is made. In the Septuagint there is an allusion, which differs -from the Vulgate and the different translations. In Chronicles we -have upper chambers mentioned, which were overlaid with gold; this -might have been the rooms or chambers above the Holy of Holies. No -special staircase led to this room. It was undoubtedly a mysterious -apartment, and, like all mysteries, excited some writers to very varied -speculations on its possible nature. Amongst others the learned Ben -David, in a letter to Lichtenberg in the Berlin 'Archive der Zeit,' -asserted that this chamber must have contained an electric battery, for -golden chains connected the room with the pillars of Jachin and Boaz, -which were hollow, and could be placed in communication with the altar -of brass. The points of the temple were golden. At the consecration -of the temple, clouds, produced by incense, suddenly filled the -interior of the temple, and a flash of lightning ignited the sacrifice. -Michaelis tells us that the temple was never struck by lightning--the -lightning, therefore, setting fire to the sacrifice must have been -produced within the temple. - -No stone roofs or vaults are mentioned in connection with the temple -or palace built by the Jews; architecture was, therefore, in its most -primitive stage. The inner temple and the Holy of Holies were entered -through folding-doors. The Holy of Holies was entirely empty, symbolic -of the incomprehensibility of the nature of the Deity. This was also -the case in Egypt with the 'sekos,' which was, in fact, a shrine either -quite empty, or containing a scroll, on which were written the words: -'I am that was, that is, and that shall be.' Two courts surrounded -the temple, an inner and an outer court. The outer court was open -to every Jew, but the inner court to the priests only. The former -was surrounded by a double row of pillars overlaid with cedar-wood. -It is said that Solomon had valleys filled up in order to make the -concrete subconstruction of the length even. Each side of the outer -wall surrounding the whole temple was 4 stadia or 1 stadium (606 feet -9 inches English) in length, giving 2,427 feet all round. The pillars -Jachin and Boaz stood on the staircase of the inner court; each was 36 -feet in circumference, 54 feet in height without the capital, which -was 15 feet high. The shafts were hollow and the brass 4 inches thick. -On the south-eastern side stood the round brass basin, called the sea, -30 feet in diameter, in which the priests used to wash their hands. -Besides the 'sea,' there stood on pedestals on either side of the -temple five cups, 12 feet in diameter and 9 feet high. The altar of the -burning sacrifice, in the middle of this space, was 60 feet broad and -as many feet long; all these secondary necessaries of the temple stood -in the east. The surrounding courts rose in terraces like those of -the palace of Persepolis. The temple, whatever its magnificence might -have been in precious stones, gold, silver, carved cherubim, brass and -silver vessels, washing-basins and candlesticks, was architecturally an -utter failure, whether compared with the monumental temples of Egypt, -the grand and splendid palaces of Assyria, Babylon, or Persepolis, -or the temple of Diana at Ephesus. The latter, which was built on a -marsh, that it might not be endangered by earthquakes, was 425 feet -in length and 220 in width, and had 127 columns 60 feet high, each -the gift of a king. This is the account given by Pliny, who, however, -describes either the seventh or eighth temple. Stable as was everything -in religious matters with the Jews, they did not venture in rebuilding -their temple to make any alterations; a stone displaced, an ornament -improved, might have driven their God from his chosen abode. With such -ideas art is impossible. The additions made to the temple under the -Romans, in order to render the building more in harmony with their -street architecture, were only outer courts with rich colonnades of -Corinthian columns, and had nothing to do with the temple itself. -These formed the Stoa-Basilica, with the court of the Gentiles, which -is spoken of as imposing and forming a mighty group, and must not be -confounded with the temple itself, which was certainly no specimen of -architecture, either in dimension, in plan, or in decoration, if we -except some stiff vine foliage on capitals, which was exceptionally -characteristic of the Jewish style. - -The numerous tombs in the neighbourhood of Jerusalem are rock-hewn, -clearly betraying their Egyptian origin; they are provided with -numerous hollows for the reception of the bodies. These sepulchres are -without any artistic stamp; on some facades we can see the Egyptian -fluted corona. The facades of the so-called royal tombs of Jacob or the -judges are decorated in a Greek style, as are the tombs of Zacharias -and Absalom; the latter stand out from the rock as independent -structures, ornamented with Ionic pillars, and above the Egyptian -corona rises a pyramidal or conical structure; a combination of the -pre-historic tumulus with Egyptian and classic elements. Something is -borrowed from everyone to make up a chosen national element. - -In books or in conversation this may avail, but in art, where the -outer impression is to create a corresponding sensation, assertions -must be borne out by visible productions, and to falsify architectural -records is much more difficult than to interpolate passages, alter -dates, or make assertions in utter defiance of probability and -possibility. The Hebrews, whether as Jews or Israelites, had no -art, and never pretended to have one; they were contented with the -art-products which other nations made for them, in perfect accordance -with the clearly-expressed promise of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and -Jacob: 'That He would give them great and goodly cities, which they -would not build; and houses full of good things, which they would not -fill; and wells digged, which they would not dig; and vineyards and -olive trees, which they would not plant.' With such principles neither -architecture, sculpture, nor ornamentation could flourish. Art in Asia -never became master of matter from an esthetical point of view, for, -in all these works, matter sways the mind; it is either an exhibition -of precious stones on walls, or lace-work in marble, or endless heaps -of huge granite blocks and columns without purpose, or decorations in -wild, fantastic, and endless combinations. The Eastern mind could not -free itself from the influence of a mighty hierarchy. In the East it -was the eternal _Hermes_, the _Logos_, the _priest_, who read truth -in the stars, manufactured gods and goddesses, wrote the language of -heaven, drew up plans for temples, squared out the proportions of the -human body, and gave laws to sculptors and painters, to stone-cutters -and masons, to joiners and carpenters, weavers and dyers. Hermes, with -his followers, was the physician, the lawgiver, and the judge of the -masses; he prayed, he sacrificed for them, he prophesied, circumcised, -married, embalmed, and buried them. The priest in the East, whether -as Brahman, Buddhist, Hierophant, Magi, or Levite, generally placed -the idea, the spirit, the word, the {logos} above the form, which, -in itself, crippled the form the more effectually, because the form, -however revolting, was the mere symbol of some sacred mystery. The -creative genius of art was thus almost extinguished under the stifling -and petrifying influence of hierarchical formalism, and, until it had -been freed from this, could neither develop nor prosper. The process of -freeing humanity from this formalism was first begun and accomplished -by the Greeks. - - - - -CHAPTER VIII. - -GREEK ART. - - -Art has appeared to us till now under peculiar circumstances. -We have seen it in Asia and Africa, and in both parts of the -world it represented the uninterrupted struggle of humanity for -self-consciousness. Humanity was too much under the influence of the -marvellous and incomprehensible, and neither the marvellous nor the -incomprehensible can be brought into shape. The Indians tried to give -forms to the metaphysical phenomena of nature; the Persians were bent -on the glorification of the power of one visible earthly despot; -the Egyptians tried to copy the realistic phenomena of nature, and -inscribed them with mystic signs, uniting Indian abstractions with -the real phenomena of nature. When a thought was fixed into a form; -the thought, being at the same time a religious conception, could no -more be changed; it became in art what a technical name for a natural -phenomenon is in science. Oxygen is oxygen, and designates only that -element; so when once a form was settled, as that of Vishnu or Amn, -S'iva or Osiris--or the serpent fixed as a symbol of eternity, or the -hawk as a symbol of light--the inner or spiritual life of the artist -was fettered down to outward forms with special inward meanings. Thus -the constraining sway of misunderstood nature on one side, and the -stationary precepts of an omnipotent hierarchy on the other, entangled -the artist's imagination and paralysed every effort of his subjective -power of production. The different nations began to be wrapped up -in their different artistic forms, which became by degrees hard and -impenetrable _national_ and religious incrustations; the masses, held -in abeyance, led by theocratical art, had only to glorify one visible -or invisible tyrant, with whom the universe was blessed. Eastern art -was to a certain degree plastic, only too plastic as in India; but -it was too penetrated with an incomprehensible spiritualism to find -the right objects for its plastic tendencies. Even where geometrical -figures, flowers, or trees were used, the effect of their simple -combination was marred by a want of harmony between thought and form, -or idea and body. This harmony between outward form and inner spirit, -wherein real beauty consists, this balance between the dynamic and -static cosmogonical elements, was wanting in Eastern art. The East rent -nature asunder, and looked upon _matter_ as _evil_; and yet matter was -to be used, to bring spirit into form. The element of S'iva, Ahriman, -or Typhon was to give visible form to the conceptions of Brahma, -Ormuzd, or Osiris, and could not do this, because the connecting -link to blend the apparently-opposed powers into one, was wanting. A -uniting force for this mysterious antagonism, a mediator between heaven -and earth, divinity and humanity, was sought for, but not found. The -Persian unconsciously set Meshiah (man, _mensch_) down as that element, -but Meshiah was not yet allowed to come to any free development, and -he sank into the pitiful and degraded position of a slave to despotic -oligarchs, or still more intolerant spiritual hierarchs. Meshiah -(humanity) was first freed by the _Greeks_ in _form_ and by _Christ_ in -_spirit_. - -There can be no doubt that the Greeks were, for a short time at least, -the ancient representatives of the well-balanced static and dynamic -forces in humanity. Of all the geographical districts of the world, -whether in the Eastern or Western hemisphere, none are so admirably -adapted for the cultivation of social intercourse as the Grecian -isles, and the Grecian peninsula, the classical region of the Aegean -Sea. Nowhere is so large a coast-line found, surrounding so small -a territorial surface; nowhere such a variety of creeks, capes, -promontories, inlets, and harbours as round the Peloponnesus, and the -islands uniting Asia Minor with Greece and Italy. No streams like the -Ganges, or the Hoang-ho; no mountains like the Belur Tag or Himalaya. -Gorgeous uniformity is the characteristic of China and India; variety -and change the very element of the Greek world. Mountains, plains, -valleys, streams, are all of a limited size; there rules a sweet, -eternal harmony between spirit and form; nothing is exaggerated, -nothing overawes man; he feels at home; the dark-blue sky over-arches -his verdant, hilly, amiable earth, adorned with brooks and hills, -boskets and flowers. Valley chases valley; rivulet pursues rivulet; -clouds follow clouds; the morning dawn flies before the bright noon, -and the noon dies away, in the cool sighs of the evening breezes, into -the embrace of dark night. The self-conscious spirit of _youthful_ -humanity came into life for the first time in Greece. Everything with -the Greeks was _feeling_, but a feeling, conscious of a real purpose -in religion, the State, the family, and in art. We shall see that -intuitive feeling grow by degrees into _critical reflection_, but in -the first instance everything with the Greeks was ingenuous, or, as the -French call it, 'naive.' This classical 'naivete,' this unconscious, -unaffected simplicity, enabled them to become masters of intuitive -productions, and to look upon this world with an unbiassed eye, prone -only to see what was harmonious and beautiful. The whole life of -the Greeks was thus one long _ideal_ dream of poetical and artistic -_reality_. They took an interest, however, in objective individuality -only; the beauties of nature as one great total did not yet affect -their subjective comprehension. They could not grasp the pantheistic -notion of the Indians, who saw in every detailed phenomenon of the -universe the working of ONE indivisible and incomprehensible first -cause. They shuddered at the Egyptian monsters, which were to serve -as symbols of that sublime conception which lost on the Nile all its -primitive grandeur. They found the Persian absorption of the universe -into a conflict between light and darkness too dreary, and ascribed -to it the loss of all individual freedom. They worked out a system of -their own, based on Indian grandeur, Egyptian symbolism, and Persian -abstractions. To be thoroughly acquainted with this combination of -influences is the very first step towards an understanding of Greek art. - -The Greeks were Aryans in language, and in mode of thinking; Aryans -who had detached themselves very early from their Cis-Himalayan -brethren, and peopled Asia Minor and the surrounding islands. They were -strengthened by Egyptian and Phoenician immigrations, and invigorated by -Thracia's warlike spirit. - -Like a plant that only lives and grows by means of the antithetic -activity of air, light, and water, the Greek State-body had air -supplied by Orpheus from Thracia, light by Kekrops from Egypt, and -water by Kadmus from Phoenicia. Independent freedom and love of the -arts were the gifts of the North; the South furnished them with deep -knowledge, and Phoenicia gave them the vivifying spirit of commerce. -Their language is an offshoot of the Sanskrit, but stands in a more -distant relation to it than the Zend--to which it is closely allied. -They are principally distinguished from the Asiatic nations by their -decided hatred of everything arbitrary and chaotic. From their love for -individuality and diversity of customs, manners and modes of thinking, -sprang the national unity of the Greeks in the fairy realms of Poetry -and Art. When they began to feel themselves a people, they assumed the -name of Hellenes; and their first historical deed was the admirable -completion of a language which, for simplicity, power, and beauty, -has remained up to our own days a model for all other languages, for -it alike possesses eurythmy and power of expression. The overwhelming -metaphysical subtleties of the Sanskrit are simplified; the variety -of consonants and vowels reduced, and the mode of writing corrected; -everything proving a deep sense for order, clearness, and moderation. - -They had three dialects: the Doric, distinguished by a broader -pronunciation; the Ionic, possessed of softness and a melodious -richness; and the Aeolic, a kind of mixture without a special character. -The Dorians came southwards from the hoary mountains of Thessaly, and -gained step by step an influence and dominion over the other tribes -of Greece. The Ionians occupied the east, and were considered the -connecting link between Hellas and Asia; but whatever the Hellenes took -from Byblos, Sidon, Tyros or the Libanon, assumed a really Hellenic -form, after it had passed through the purifying element of Doric -correctness. The south gave _ideas_, and the north brought them into -_form_. - -Whatever the Hellenes touched they beautified. The powerful giant Bhima -of the Mahabharata is the prototype of Herakles; but in the myths -concerning Herakles we recognise the mere personification of commercial -daring and enterprise. Accompanied by his dog, he finds the cochineal; -the goblet in which he sails to Erytheia is but the Phoenician -merchantman; the Phoenicians are referred to, when it is recorded of -him that he had broken the devastating horn of the mountain-streams. -Moloch, to whom Assyrians, Indians and Hebrews sacrificed, without ever -being capable of investing the fire-spitting monster with anything like -poetry, was destroyed by Herakles. The gods of Asia became with the -Hellenes demons, from whom they learned some useful trades. Poseidon, -the god of the sea, is, like the element over which he rules and in -which he dwells, of a sinister, implacable character; he requires -human sacrifices, annihilates horses (meaning ships), in fact does, -as incarnate divinity, what the sea does in our own times. The Titans -are acquainted with astronomy, and are personifications of a certain -knowledge in maritime matters. Proteus, the Egyptian Pharaoh, is -with them the keeper of the seas, and Atlas the father of nautical -astronomy, and both were companions of the Tyrean Herkules. In all -the myths and legends of the Greeks we can trace some facts. The -divinity they could only comprehend in the well-proportioned form of a -human being, and a hero or benefactor of humanity became with them a -divinity. This blending into one of the divine and human is the most -important feature in Greek thought. Vishnu and Osiris also became -incarnate--but their deeds were supernatural; the principal feature -of their 'man-godhead,' or 'divine manhood,' is an incomprehensible -mysticism. Their anthropomorphism had in it something gloomy. When the -divine Apollo uttered the memorable words: '_Man, know thyself_,' the -Greeks became suddenly conscious of the inborn spark of the divine -intellect in man; the gods were intelligible to them, and the Asiatic -world of abstractions emerged in a thousand different human forms of -divine conceptions. - -_Uranos_ (_Varuna_ in Sanskrit) is heaven, or rather space--_Kronos_, -time, and _Gaea_, earth. _Uranos_ as well as _Kronos_ and _Pontos_ were -offsprings of the Earth. So far we have to deal with the same mystical -elements which engendered all the Asiatic cosmogonies. But Uranos and -Gaea are set down as male and female, and are endowed with powerful -children--the Titans and Titanides, the Hekatoncheires (or Kentimanos, -hundred-handed, powerful giants with fifty heads), and the Kyklopes, -who were very clever, and invented many useful arts. - -The most important gods were Okeanos, Japetos, and Kronos. The human -character of Greek mythology begins even before the birth of Zeus. -Uranos was afraid of his own children, and had them confined in eternal -darkness in Tartaros; their mother, Gaea, had pity on them, and armed -the youngest, Kronos, with a sickle, with which he attacked Uranos, -and deprived him of his creative power. From that moment Uranos was -idle, could produce no new forms, and was neither worshipped by gods -nor men. The fact which underlies this dramatic scene, in which gods -are the actors, is a cosmical phenomenon. In time all things were -created, and in time the creative force, as far as our earth was -concerned, ceased with the creation of man, to be productive of new -forms. Kronos had five children--Hestia, Demeter, Here, Pluton, and -Poseidon, and these he devoured. In this cruel image we see represented -the revolving movements of time, in which the present is everlastingly -the prey of the past, engendering the future. The sixth son of Kronos, -Zeus (creative ether), was saved by his mother's cunning, for she gave -the inhuman god a stone instead of her child; Metis, however (Maya, -Matter), afterwards the wife of Zeus; rescues the children that Kronos -had swallowed, and he is obliged to give them back again in an eternal -circle. These children of Kronos are years, months, weeks, days and -hours. We have here an instance of the manner in which phenomena were -turned by the Hellenes into living beings. Kronos was an old man with -a long flowing beard, and held a sickle or scythe in his hands, with -which he cut down everything. And as symbol of eternity a serpent lay -by his side. - -Zeus serves us even more as a specimen of the anthropomorphic tendency -of the Greeks. He was the _father_ of the gods, and had to _fight_ -with the Titans. He led the immortal gods, who assembled on Mount -Olympus against these terrible Titans, who mustered in great strength -on Mount Othrys. For ten years the battle raged without result; heaven, -earth, and sea resounded with the frightful struggle. Gaea advised -the gods to call in the Kyklopes and Hekatoncheires. These presented -Poseidon with the trident, Pluton with the helmet that had the power -to make the wearer invisible, and Zeus received from the depths of -the earth the flaming thunderbolts. Then only the Titans had to yield -to storms and lightnings, and were chained down at last in Tartaros. -We read a chapter of geology when we peruse Hesiod's description of -this struggle. In the Titans, Kyklopes, and the hundred-handed giants -we recognise the antediluvian monsters--the mastodons, megatheriums, -and saurians, petrified for ever in the strata of the earth's crust. -Zeus, after his conquest, began to rule the Olympian gods and mankind. -He himself was full of passion and wrath, of human failings and -shortcomings; but, after all, he was kind, dignified--even in his -weakness, just and grand. He smiled, and love and joy pervaded the -universe; he frowned, and the universe shook to its very foundations. -He indulged in freaks, and still was afraid of his haughty and jealous -wife, who acted in many instances as a well-bred lady would, who had -the misfortune to be wedded to an amorous husband. Zeus was frequently -so troubled by his riotous gods and goddesses, that he had a bad -headache, and was once obliged to call in Hephaistos to cure him with -a heavy blow, and on this occasion Minerva (wisdom) sprang forth armed -with spear, helmet, and shield. The truth that intellect and reason are -of divine origin was proclaimed in this myth. In the Greek legends the -poet's imagination has turned the forces of nature into beautiful men, -women, or children. How much the gods, with them, were the creatures -of man's fancy, may be seen in the fear of the opinions of their -earth-born children with which the gods were endowed. The Almighty -Thunderer, when his heavenly subjects made too much noise, often cried: -'What will my earthly sons say?' and for fear that they might find -fault with him he yielded, and made concessions, and heaven and earth, -sun, moon and stars were again at peace. - -It is true that in Indian lore the same characters are drawn, but, -like their supernatural gods, they are gigantic and monstrous. Men -and women in the Indian fables, behave like unwieldy spectres, that -frighten us during an uneasy dream; we must first divest them of their -inhuman forms in order to comprehend them. The conceptions are too -marvellous to impress us with moral lessons; we are lost in allegories, -metaphors, symbols and double meanings. This occurs less in Greek -mythology. _Atlas_ was the representative of patience; he had for -ever to carry the world on his shoulders, and was turned at last into -a rocky mountain range. _Epimetheus_ was the prototype of senseless -carelessness, and was destroyed by his own folly. _Prometheus_ at last -was the embodiment of considerate prudence; he was devoured by the -_vulture_ of 'care and sorrow for the morrow.' Prometheus may be said -to be the best, most intelligible emblem of classic humanity, as Faust -may be considered as the incarnation of romantic mankind. Prometheus -wanted to bring matter into form; Faust to _know_ what held spirit and -matter together. Prometheus stole fire from heaven, made man of clay, -and vivified him. Faust knew that this heavenly fire was a force over -which he had no control, and he called in a spirit to teach him 'how -all one whole harmonious weaves, each in the other works and lives.' -The '_formal_' is the longing of the Greek Faust, and the '_spiritual_' -the aspiration of the Teuton Prometheus. All the Greek eidola embodied -some power of nature. Philomela was a pining woman. The Laurel was -formed out of the lovely Daphne (from the Sanskrit Dahanah, our word -'dawn'). In every tree a Dryad dwelt, in every wave a Naiad sported. -Demeter's tears for her lost daughter Persephone nourished rivulets. -On the bright heights of Mount Olympus, on Helikon, or Parnassus, or -Pindus, above the petty cares of every-day life, sat the earnest _Klio_ -with an open scroll and a stylum, recording with lovely patience the -events of the past. _Euterpe_, with her two flutes, brought harmony -into the discordant sounds of the earthly spheres, and filled the world -with songs and tunes; _Melpomene_, armed with gloomy mask and dagger, -presided over the fictitious sufferings of humanity struggling with -the inexorable fates, reflecting in an artificial mirror--reality. -_Thalia_, with a shepherd's staff and a Silenus' mask, endowed with an -eternal smile, comforted man with more cheerful views. _Terpsichore_, -with a lyre of seven chords, taught him to express joy, happiness, and -pious veneration by the rhythmical movements of his body. _Erato_, on -her Kythera with nine chords, warbled love-songs, and inspired and -aided young poets to pour out in measured language the immeasurable -feelings of their souls. _Polyhymnia_, or Polymnia, protected orators, -philosophers, and stage-players, and enabled them to keep within the -boundaries of moderation, for she placed the first finger of her right -hand on her lips, impressing them with the necessity for caution. -_Urania_, with her eyes lifted to the starry heavens, tried to draw -man's attention to the well-regulated courses of the heavenly bodies, -proclaiming in eternal silence with fiery tongues the glories of the -universe. _Kalliope_ finally taught man to record heroic deeds in -epic poetry. These _nine_ muses, presided over by the manly and wise, -valorous and glorious Apollo, nursed, taught, and accompanied the -Hellenes through life; they met them as lovely charmers in a thousand -different forms, in temples, on friezes, metopes, goblets, pateras, -amphorae, and urns; nothing possessed a meaning for them that had not a -poetical, artistic, and scientific aim. - -Life with the Greeks was one continual festivity. They worshipped their -gods in singing joyous songs, in running, playing, and wrestling. They -thought it a duty to develop both body and intellect, the gifts of the -immortal gods. They deeply loved poetry, wrote it if they could, or -recited it, or listened to it and imbibed it with their whole souls. -They rejoiced in athletic sports; influenced by Terpsichore, they -showed the wondrous beauty of their harmoniously-constructed bodies. -Joy and delight swelled their muscles when they wrestled, and throbbed -through all their veins when they moved in rhythmical simplicity, like -the stars in heaven. They prayed when they composed epic poems; they -worshipped when they wrote tragedies or comedies; they honoured the -gods when they built temples; they humbly beseeched their blessing -when they sculptured. The whole life of the Greeks was one grateful -act of artistic devotion. Their temples were so many hymns in stone -and marble; their ornamentations in reliefs, sculptures, winding -frets and meanders, are epic poems, dramatic representations, and -lyric effusions of the very highest intellectual refinement. Art with -the Greeks was cherished, cultivated, and loved for its own divine -sake. Rich and poor, old and young, men and women, boys and girls, -used art and poetry, science and philosophy, as the plastic language -of their ever-praying lips, hands and minds. Whenever the life of a -nation is thus inspired; when the comprehensive culture of intellect, -the harmonious development of the body, and the mysterious feelings of -existence are guided by the mighty and productive energy of an awakened -and excited imagination, and regulated by a consciousness of order; art -must attain that expansive, noble, and beautiful form which we admire -in the Greeks. - -Greek poetry and philosophy had the same basis of reality as their -mythology. That which was asserted by the Asiatic and African -law-givers to have been directly dictated by the gods, was gradually -acquired by the Greeks through deductive and inductive reasoning. Soon -the mythological conceptions of the poets were turned into eidola. -Aphrodite was set down as the representative of matter, out of which -all things were formed. Pallas-Athene lost her individuality, and -became intellect pervading humanity. Apollo was no more the 'god-man' -or the living sun, but cosmical heat. The forms of fearful monsters -that originated in Asia, with ferocious jaws, with three heads, -spreading fear and awe, looking as if nothing but human flesh could -satisfy their voracity, also terrified the Greeks during the mythic -period of their national existence, and human flesh was accordingly -sacrificed. Such sacrifices were prevalent wherever monster-gods, -without human shape, without legs or arms, with fishes' tails, dog's -or cat's heads, with round and glaring eyes, and many arms, inspired -the masses with fear and trembling. This was the case in Greece when -monsters and pirates peopled the sea-coasts; when _Geryon_, the giant -with three bodies, three heads, six hands, six legs, and two wings; -_Echidna_, the wife of Typhon; the _Lernean_ serpent, with nine or with -fifty heads; the _Chimera_, with a lion's or goat's head; the _Sphinx_, -with a woman's head and bust, the body of a lion, and the wings and -tail of a dragon; and the fearfully howling _Skylla_, with six heads -and six long necks, formed part of their pantheon. As soon, however, as -poetry threw a glittering veil of beauty over the forces and phenomena -of nature, no one thought of sacrificing human flesh to the gods. Who -could have slaughtered a human being in the sight of the Olympian Zeus -or the Pallas-Athene of Pheidias, the Venus of Alkemenes, or the Apollo -of Praxiteles? - -The Greek mind, once on the road to progress through a correct -appreciation of beauty, developed with incredible rapidity. - -The elements of art as well as of science are threefold. We have:-- - -a. The reign of _imagination_ through the emotional element, -more or less regulated; - -b. That of _intellect_, the reflective element, more or less -influenced by imagination; and - -c. That of _reason_, the speculative element, discerning -between imagination and intellect, and binding the two into one. - -The first element is the province of the unconscious artist. He -trusts his own subjective imagination, and sees things only from his -individual point of view. - -The second tries to compare the different products of art, to draw -analogies between them, and to assign causes for certain forms. This is -the province of the chronicler, the antiquary, and the art-historian. - -The third reaches the sphere of philosophical consciousness. In it the -esthetical writer combines a correct appreciation of art as a grand -total, with all its essential details. He sees distinctly its inner -element based on immutable general laws, and comprehends the necessary -organism, without which an artistic work cannot exist. - -Poetry and philosophy, like art, passed through these developments in -Greece. First we have the epic and lyric poets: Homer, Hesiod, Sappho, -Alkaeus, and Pindar; next the dramatic poets: Aeschylus, Sophokles, and -Euripides. At last the philosophers and historians: Plato, Aristotle, -Herodotus, Thukydides, and Xenophon. - -In analogy with these purely mental phases we have in art: the -architect, who constructs a small world of organic coherence out -of inorganic matter by means of his imagination; the sculptor, who -reproduces with discernment the organic world around him in inorganic -matter, but endows it with individual expression and feeling; the -painter at last, who creates with his colours a union of spirit and -matter, of idea and form. - -Beauty was in all Greek products the vital element. 'True beauty, the -companion of the gods, must be sought for,' says Pausanias, and makes -no advances; it is too elevated to communicate itself,' And Plato -propounds: 'The Supreme has no image; he converses only with the wise; -with the vulgar he shows himself proud and forbidding; always equal, he -expresses the emotion of the souls, he wraps himself in the delicious -calm of that divine nature of which the great masters in the arts, -according to ancient writers, endeavoured to seize the type.' This -delicious calm may be traced everywhere in Greek art, and forms its -essential element. - -The temples of the Greeks were national and public buildings. They were -not mere shrines destined as exclusive dwelling-places for some visible -or invisible, concrete or abstract, theocratic monster. They were the -central spots for their national assemblies, their gatherings, and for -the celebration of their public festivities. - -The Olympian, Pythian, Nemaean, and Isthmian games attracted visitors -to these temples. These games did not consist of mere exhibitions of -athletic prowess; but poets like Pindar--tragedians like Aeschylus and -Sophokles--historians like Herodotus--read to enraptured audiences the -masterly products of their intellectual powers. Wrestlers and runners, -sculptors and poets, and tragic and comic writers vied with one another -to be crowned with a laurel wreath, or to receive a palm-twig, some -a crown, or a tripod. No sordid feeling of gain mingled with their -yet unalloyed pleasure in being distinguished for mere distinction's -sake; the commercial question was unregarded. The prizes, given away -in the sight of the delighted masses, were for everything--for bodily -as well as for intellectual excellence--even for proficiency in the -art of kissing. At the festival of the Philesian Apollo a prize for -the most exquisite kiss was conferred upon a young lady. At Sparta -and at Lesbos, in the temple of Here, and also among the citizens -of Parrhasia, women contended for the prizes with men. How much we -try to imitate Greek customs may be judged from the fact, that we -also give prizes for exquisite dogs, cats out of proportion, and fat -babies; but we are sorry to say, that this is done with a keen eye to -business--to advertise a baby-food or a dog-or cat-fancier. That art is -not altogether Greek with us need astonish no one. We are trained for -practical purposes, but the Greeks were trained to appreciate beauty, -symmetry, and harmony, not in verses only, but also in the human frame -and in every product of art. Architecture with them was thoroughly -plastic; it was never subservient to some metaphysical subtlety; it -was finished in itself; a total of which every part formed, as in the -human body, a completing element--without which the whole conception -of a temple would be as incomplete as a man without arms, legs, or -toes. The Greek temple entirely differed from the gloomy buildings of -Egypt or India, which were constructed as symbols of hell, earth, and -heaven; hell was for the sinners, the outcasts and the poor; earth for -the respectable middle-classes; and heaven for the priests, the kings -and their high officials. The constructions never made any attempt -at symmetrical beauty, but aimed only at gorgeous pomp, in order to -overawe the credulous mob--mystery was their essence. Sudden turnings -placed the terrified worshipper, unawares, face to face with some -colossal idol, looking to the excited and surprised imagination twice -as large as it was, and ascending and descending staircases visibly -divided the temple into abodes of splendour and horror. With the -ancient Greeks in constructing a temple, the first question was the -aim of the building; to whom was it to be dedicated--to Zeus, Apollo, -Poseidon, Minerva or Venus? This question once decided, the most -convenient spot, in accordance with the character of the god to whose -worship the temple was to be dedicated, was chosen. The building to be -erected was always to be in harmony with the surrounding scenery. - -The temple with the Greeks generally stood on a terrace-like base of -several steps. - -The Doric, Ionic, and Korinthian orders, as architectural subdivisions, -are most usual. So far as the different styles are concerned, a -fourth must be added, which modern art-historians call the Attic. The -Greeks were undoubtedly the first people who succeeded in producing -architectural works of art; they were also the first:-- - -(_a_) To distinguish the material; - -(_b_) To bring about symmetry and proportion; and - -(_c_) To construct with a clear consciousness of purpose. - -Marble was most profusely made use of; wood also, but the latter by -degrees disappeared altogether. The Athenians completed even the roofs -of their temples in stone. - -The Greeks availed themselves of soft materials, such as clay, chalk, -gypsum, and marble dust, for stucco ({koniasis}), in which they -excelled all other nations. - -Metal too formed an important element in their decorations. It is -asserted by many authorities that the Korinthian capital was not the -latest development of Greek architecture; but that on the contrary -it was older than the simplified and more correct Doric capital, -which, showing no traces of wood-construction, is altogether of a -pure 'stone-feeling,' whilst the forms of the Korinthian capital bear -undoubted traces of wood-carving and metallotechnic. - -We see that the Greeks employed pliable, plastic, elastic and solid -materials; the great secret of their success lay in the fact that they -made use of these elements appropriately. - -The vertical and horizontal were the principal lines used by the -Greeks. The curved line was not altogether excluded. The uprising -straight lines in columns were cylindrical or conical. The relation -of the lines to one another, and to the whole of the building, was -regulated by a strict observation of the laws of proportion. - -The diameter or half-diameter of the column (the module) served as the -unit for the whole building. As in the human body the general law of -proportion does not exclude an infinite diversity of forms, so in the -Greek temples regulation did not preclude variety. In man the height is -limited, and, to a certain extent, determined by his bones. This was -the case in the Greek temple. The height was limited by the diameter of -the column. Taking two columns of the same height, the one thin and the -other thick, the thin column will appear high and the other short, but -both will have a certain proportion, taken from their own body; the one -will be, say, nine times the diameter of its body, and the other only -seven times. Proportion in no way fetters the artist; it allows him -perfect freedom, but _freedom in order_, without which no good building -is possible. All architectural elements are of geometrical origin. -These elements are to be divided into those that support, and those -that are supported. The column is the most perfect supporting body; -surrounding a vertical axis in a slightly conical form. Through the -'_contractura_,' the swelling or tapering, it assumes the most perfect -expression of the dynamic force in the striving upwards. Through the -square plinth (Abacus) a harmonious union is effected between column, -as supporter, and architrave, as the supported, or static, element of -the building. - -The Greek temple was pre-eminently the house of the man-like god. The -god in the most exquisite idealised human form was visibly present. A -forecourt (pronaos) led to the cella (naos); there was a rear-court -(posticum), and occasionally a special court (the opisthodome) was -added. Architecture and sculpture were closely allied in Greece; and -still so clear and rational a separation between these two art-sisters, -as existed there, has nowhere been observed. Through this apparent -contradiction, architecture gained an independent soul, full of emotion -and life, whilst sculpture obtained a well-proportioned body, the -closely united artistic product being thus endowed with solidity and -firmness. - -The general architectural arrangement of a Greek temple was invariably -the same. The cella, the abode of the divinity, was of smaller -or larger dimensions. Two rows of columns adorned the interior, -supporting an upper gallery. If the central space was left roofless, -to supply the temple with light, it was called _hypaethral_. A temple, -surrounded by one row of columns, was designated a _Peripteros_; -if two rows of columns ornamented it, a _Dipteros_. With a front -portico it was _Prostyle_; provided with a court, both front and back, -_Amphiprostyle_. The pillars projecting on the side walls were _antae_; -and a temple having this decorative element was styled an _Antaetemple_. -The colonnade surrounding the temple at smaller or greater distances, -represented a combined power of support. The base marked the -independent existence of the separate columns. The shaft was covered -with channelled flutings, and rose vertically with a convex extension -of its circumference (called _entasis_). It then strongly contracted, -thus expressing in the most perfect manner not merely passive -sustaining, but an active and lively support. Above the capitals the -mighty beams of the architrave (epistyle) were held together by a broad -band, on which rested the frieze, sometimes adorned with triglyphs and -metopes, or with reliefs; above it projected the overhanging plinth -of the principal cornice. On the narrow sides of the oblong building, -bordered by a cornice (the corona, geison) and the roof-gutter, -rose the pediment with its groups and statues. On the front edge of -the roof, both at the corners and in the middle, there stood smaller -sculptures or marble palm-trees; whilst at the sides the rain-water -was ejected through lions' heads; the finishing horizontal lines were -eurythmically crowned with palm-shaped tiles (antifixae). The roof and -the rest of the building, in the noblest works, were of marble, the -architectural product being thus transformed into an elegant chiselled -work of sculpture. - -The Greeks had in their mythology: - -1. Powerful gods and goddesses, as Zeus, Pallas, Poseidon, and Mars. - -2. Charming and lovely divinities, as Aphrodite, Eros, and Persephone. - -3. Mixtures of sublime power and beauty, of manly dignity and -womanly grace, as Here, Diana, Bacchus, and Apollo. In studying -the characteristics of these three groups of divinities we become -acquainted with the principal features of the three orders of their -architecture. - -I. The _Doric_ order is full of power and monumental dignity. Force is -its most prominent characteristic. - -II. The _Ionic_ order mingles southern imagination with northern -severity; this order, with its voluted capital instead of the simple -abacus, is of a more complicated character and livelier expression. - -III. The _Korinthian_ order exhibits, instead of the tapering Doric, a -slender column--ending in a richly-decorated, upward-striving capital. -There is something of the Doric style in the Ionic, and something of -the Ionic in the Korinthian. The Doric was, however, the basis of Greek -architecture. - -_A._ The _Doric_ order had six distinct developments of style. - -_a._ The _proto-Doric_, compressed and heavy. - -_b._ The _lax Archaic-Doric_, slender, with more distinctly-tapering -columns. - -_c._ The _stern Archaic-Doric_, more finished and graceful in its -proportions. - -_d._ The _pure Doric_, most correct in all its details. - -_e._ The _Attic-Doric_, during the rule of Perikles, combining utmost -severity with the very highest refinement in execution. - -_f._ The _Makedonian-Doric_ style; not correctly proportioned, the -columns becoming elongated, and the distances narrowed. Gorgeousness -and vanity predominate. - -_B._ The _Ionic_ order had three distinct phases of development in -style. - -_a._ The first _simple_ in form, with the strongly-pronounced volute. - -_b._ The _richly ornamented_ style, as in the temple of Minerva Polias. - -_c._ The _compound_ style; half Doric and half Ionic. - -_C._ The _Korinthian_ order passed through four phases of style: - -_a._ The _undecided_ style; half Ionic and half Korinthian. - -_b._ The _finished_ style; graceful and rich. - -_c._ The _over-decorated_ style, with strong Ionic forms. - -_d._ The _variegated_ style, with decorative additions of trophies, -winged-horses, dolphins, and eagles; half northern and half -southern--combining Asiatic with Greek forms. - -_D._ The Doric intermingled with Ionic forms produced in Attica a -peculiar order, or rather mere style, neither Doric, nor Ionic, nor -Korinthian--a kind of eclectic style which we may very properly call -the _Attic_ style. The Erechtheium of Athens was in this style. There -are six principal distinctions in this style, which justify us in -treating it as totally distinct from those mentioned under _A_, _B_ and -_C_:-- - -1. A particular plinth is wanting in the base. - -2. Instead of this, a double contraction is transformed into one, -united to the common support by means of a strong circular ovolo. The -contractura is expressed on a small scale in the base. - -3. The shaft is more slender in proportion. - -4. The volutes are more projecting. - -5. The frieze is considerably higher than it is generally in any of the -other orders. - -6. The corona is without the dentated ornament; but the projecting -plinth is strongly undercut, and powerfully overhangs the finishing -member of the frieze. - -In all classifications of this kind a narrow-minded pedantry is to be -avoided; canons, of whatever sort, hinder the natural growth of art. -Still worse than strict canons is ignorance. Without a correct and -thorough knowledge of Greek literature, no man can aspire to an exalted -position in poetry and science; and without a correct and thorough -study of Greek art, no man can become an artist. We do not recommend a -slavish imitation of the Greeks, but a thorough understanding of their -slow development, through the phases of unconscious reproduction and -systematically conscious creation, to the philosophical appreciation of -beauty, which enabled them to reflect in their works of art the eternal -types of Nature in an idealised form. - -The same gradual development which we remarked in their architecture -also took place in Greek keramic art. The oldest pottery was coarse, -the material generally taken from the most recent formation of the -soil, the Cainozoic period. These older specimens are very much alike -amongst all the Aryan nations. The forms are undecided, and made by the -hand; the ornaments, as in pre-historic times, consisted of points, -zigzags, spirals and knobs. At a very early period, however, the Greeks -as Pelasgians, Achaians, Danaians and Argeians, possessed more defined -outlines, and a more perfect symmetry, even in their very coarsest -pottery. - -In the oldest, so-called Tyrrhenian, vases we have already a decided -plastic improvement. The ornamentation takes its patterns from -metallotechnic, and we recognise Asiatic influences in the winged -horses and lions, stamped in the clay as flat ornaments. The Greek -taste improved; leaves and flowers were treated with a delicate, -idealising conventionalism; the vine, ivy, anthimion, and masks -and festoons, were used for decorative purposes, and gave to the -well-shaped vessel a high artistic value. This was the most successful -period of pottery for Greece. Samos appears to have been the principal -place for its manufacture. The use of the wheel was long dispensed -with; the Greeks trusting more to the delicacy of their touch than to -the technical accuracy of a machine. In Asia the wheel had long been -known, and it had exercised rather a detrimental than an improving -influence on pottery, as the forms, settled by religious prejudices, or -venerable custom, did not change, but remained stationary. As soon as -the Greeks adopted the wheel--it must have been in use before Homer, -for he speaks of it--their better-trained minds brought a new spirit -into the handicraft of the potter, which was then turned into real art. - -Koroebos, of Athens, a mythic person, is said to have elevated keramic -art to high perfection. Dibutades is said to have been the first -modeller in clay, and Talos, his nephew, is mentioned as the inventor -of the potter's wheel in Hellas. - -With reference to the process of colouring we have two distinct classes -of Greek pottery:-- - -1. The _oligochromatic_, from {oligos} (small), and {chroma} (colour). - -2. The _polychromatic_, from {polus} (many), and {chroma} (colour). - -I. The _oligochromatic_ class of Greek pottery may be divided into two -distinct styles: _a._ The Archaic; _b._ The Hellenic. - -_A._ As soon as the wheel became generally used, a finer paste was -required, fit for exposure to a greater heat, and for the production -of a greater variety of vessels. In the beginning the paste was -coarse-grained and of a yellowish-grey; later it was fine, and the -colour homogeneous. The glazing was without lustre, brownish-black, -and spotted, proving a want of experience in baking. We have violet, -brownish-red, and white tints badly fixed on the black glaze. With -the exception of Pithoi (wine jars) found at Thera, the vessels -belonging to the Archaic style are generally of moderate size, broad -and compressed, with sudden and bold interruptions of the curves, and -abrupt unions of the extremities. The ornament is not yet an integral -part of the vessel. The general forms are cups, pots, flasks, &c., -all being entirely black. Some are ornamented with yellowish or white -points, or with simple lines drawn all over the vessel. By degrees a -clearer understanding of the laws of ornamentation is perceptible; -the ornamentation becomes restricted to the bulge, whilst rings, -meanders, and floral ornamentations mark the upper and lower parts -of the vessel. A further progress may be seen in the treatment of -ornamentation in the animals which surround the vessels in parallel -circles. Highly interesting are the flowers, balls, and _crosses_ -on these oligochromatic vases. With the progress of civilisation we -find the human figure introduced, surrounded, however, by monstrous -combinations of Asiatic origin. Genii, with and without wings, make -their appearance; then divinities amongst lions, panthers, ostriches, -and a profusion of symbolic representations. Swans are either -tamed, chased, or killed. The spirit of Persepolis and Nineveh, of -Phoenicia and Egypt, animates these pre-Homeric compositions; they are -entirely incomprehensible. This pottery of the Greeks is of the very -highest interest; we may advantageously study in it the progress of -civilisation amongst them. - -We have a period in which monster chases monster; then a period in -which men kill monsters; then, when men begin to settle down, and to -pass from the barbarous state of mere hunters into a more settled mode -of living, freed from obnoxious wild animals, they fight against men. -The conquerors have decidedly Aryan features, whilst the conquered -have unmistakably Turanian faces. (See the work of Lord Hamilton.) -At length we suddenly surprise them before the walls of Troy; the -incidents of the Iliad are known, and furnish the potters with heroic -subjects. Achilles and Hektor, Penelope and Ulysses, may be recognised; -the first two in deadly combat, the two latter meeting after a long -separation. The subject, in these Archaic vases and vessels, is not yet -thoroughly purified, for amongst the heroes we see Gorgons with spread -wings and lolling tongues. Other monsters, destroying animals, surround -the principal actors of the drama as mere unconcerned 'dummies.' -We accompany the development a step further, and observe that the -monsters have a share in the action; they seem to take part _pro_ and -_con_, like the gods in the Iliad, and, later, they appear in yet more -purified forms as protecting divinities. It is as if the Iliad had -first been drawn in clay by potters and improved upon, till at last it -was shaped in its divine form, and edited under the name of Homer. - -_B._ The Hellenic, or classic, style of Greek pottery, based on -the Archaic, shows great improvements in every direction. The -paste is harder, finer, and well glazed, and the colours are less -discordant. The red is of a fiery brightness, and the black without -any spots--sometimes with a greenish hue. In the decoration great -delicacy of shape and feeling is prominent. The figures are laid on -with anatomical accuracy. The limiting frame is dispensed with, giving -ampler scope to a freer and still more connected ornamentation. The -curves are less protruding, and the transition from concave to convex -lines is gentler. The canon of this period, that the vessel had to form -in all its parts one continuous line, rendered these products sometimes -stiff and over-regulated. The influence of the progress in the Attic -style, however, soon corrected this evil, and the potters of Greece -vied with the very best sculptors and painters in beautiful works. -The Asiatic types of winged or unwinged monsters were merely used as -grotesque or comical friezes, and soon began to disappear altogether, -to make room for some useful animal, and, finally, to give place to -frets or garlands of the most beautiful combinations. For the monstrous -creations of an overheated imagination, heroes, gods, and goddesses -were substituted. Perseus destroying Medusa; the Forge of Hephaistos; -a triclinium with Herakles and Alkmene, Hermes and Athene; diskoboli -and their teachers; Aphrodite at her toilette; Ares, Herakles, Athene, -and Zeus driven in their quadrigas by Nike; Elektra at the tomb of -Agamemnon; Aphrodite crossing the sea on a swan; the blind Chiron -healed by Apollo; the weighing of Cupids--'young loves for sale;' and -rows of well-sketched warriors, representing the victories of valour, -beauty, and honesty over barbaric roughness, dishonesty, and despotism, -form the subjects of pictorial ornamentation. What an immense field -for the student of art to peruse, to fill his imagination with lively -classical scenes! - -II. The _polychromatic_ style took its origin in the very first -attempts in pottery, when white pipe-clay was painted over. The colours -used were red, violet, and yellow oxides of iron. At the period when -marble was introduced in architecture, and ivory in sculpture, during -the middle of the fifth century B.C., we find these highly-coloured -and richly-decorated vases. The paste was very fine, originally white, -and the colouring encaustic. Not only mineral pigments and metallic -oxides, but also vegetable colours, requiring only a very slow fire, -were known and used. The encaustic consisted of a polychromatic paste -more or less opaque, containing, in addition to wax, also flint, -whether as principal or secondary element it is difficult to decide. -This polychromatic treatment is to be observed on some smaller vessels, -and vases known under the name of Lekythus (with a narrow mouth), and -on saucers of large dimensions, the outsides having reddish figures -on black grounds, and the insides, coloured figures on white grounds. -Pottery led to fashioning in clay, and this to modelling in bronze and -sculpture. - -Architecture took its origin in religion, as also did sculpture. -Opposed to the inorganic, objective productions of human intellect, as -embodied in architecture, is spirit aspiring to a subjective existence -in sculpture. The inorganic sternness of architecture is far surpassed -by plastic art, which embodies spirit in a less fixed form. Spirit -is not yet absolutely free, for it requires a tangible body to show -its existence. Unlike music and painting, which by a mere movement -of the air, or a mixture of tints, produce bodies, plastic art has to -fill the three dimensions of space, and does this by means of coarse -matter--with clay, wood, bronze, or stone. - -Sculpture stands higher in the scale of art than architecture, for it -is not obliged to transform inorganic matter for a utilitarian purpose. - -At a certain period the Greeks were contented with shapeless -divinities; a pointed stone, a square piece of wood, the deformed root -of a tree, a pillar with a circular finish, or a cone, sufficed for -their piety. Even Plato indulged in the untenable proposition that art -was mere mimicry, and therefore a falsehood, and detrimental to virtue; -as truth ought to be the only aim of humanity. The Beautiful with -Plato was a mere abstraction, applicable exclusively to the absolute -'good'; artistic beauty was looked down upon by him as something bad -and altogether objectionable. The Kynic and Kyrenaeic schools held to -a certain degree the opinions of Plato. The Kynics said that anything -good was beautiful--anything bad ugly; whilst the Kyrenaeics propounded -that everything beautiful must be good--anything ugly must be bad; and -in this way the notions, good and bad, beautiful and ugly, changed -places. This dialectic difference led at last to Aristotle's deeper -appreciation of art. - -Aristotle, who rarely started from pre-conceived, _a priori_ ideas, -but attached his deep reasonings and admirable inductions to something -tangible and really existent, pronounced, in opposition to the -idealistic Plato, more correct thoughts on art. Imitation, mimicry -({mimesis}), is with him the subjective formation or creation of -an idea, and therefore a process far superior to that of imperfect -reality; in fact it is a sublimated, idealised representation and -reproduction of reality. Next to the 'mimesis' he required purification -from all passion ({katharsis}) to be the aim and purpose of art. Genius -and imagination were the means by which alone a work of art could be -produced. The principal element in every work of art was with him -{ethos}, and wherever Ethos, the ethic or moral principle, was wanting, -the product failed to be artistic in the highest sense of the word. - -The development of Greek sculpture has borne out the sublime views of -Aristotle on art. As soon as the merely naturalistic and sensational -began to rule supreme, the Katharsis was neglected, the Ethic no longer -swayed works of art, and the Antique died out. - -The priests at Delphos, at a time when Greece abounded with the most -exquisite Apollo-statues, still held to a pointed pillar as the emblem -of the god of wisdom and the leader of the muses. Anthropomorphism -was long opposed by the hierarchy of Delphi, but they encouraged the -artists to produce beautiful vessels, tripods, lamps, sacrificial -basins, &c., which had to be made according to certain prescribed -forms. By degrees the Asiatic idea 'that God created man in his own -image' was inverted by the Greeks, 'and man began to create the gods in -his own image.' This one sentence embodies the cause of the progressive -development of Greek sculpture on the one hand, and the ever-stationary -forms of the East on the other. The Greeks had also idols that dropped -from heaven, puppet-like forms or symbolic carvings, like the Artemis -of Ephesus or the _four-armed_ Apollo of the Lakedemonians, reminding -us of Vishnu. - -The discoveries at Athens, Kyprus, and most recently at Hassarlik by -Dr. Schliemann, prove the gradual and slow progress of Greek sculpture -in all its different phases. The first Parthenon, destroyed by the -Persians, was adorned with divinities entirely different in shape -from those which surrounded it after it had been rebuilt 444 B.C. The -dresses, ornamentations, jewels, and pearls are of Assyro-Egyptian -and Indo-Persian patterns. The faces of the divinities show far more -of the Turanian than of the Aryan type. The eyes are protruding, -the cheek-bones high, the drapery is extremely stiff, the anatomy -doll-like, and the features bear a kind of repulsive grin. In the -gigantic, rock-hewn bull, near Smyrna, we have a proof that the Indian -Nundi and the Egyptian Apis must have had their worshippers in Greece. - -Of Daidalos it is reported that he was the first who improved upon -these symbolic carvings. He made winking gods and walking images -by means of mechanical contrivances. He is said to have been a -contemporary of Theseus; both belong therefore to the mythical period. -Though a statue of Herakles, holding in his right arm a club, whilst -his left extended bears a lion's skin as a shield, is attributed to -him; and though Homer mentions Daidalos, of Krete, as having wrought a -dance in metal for Ariadne, which formed the model for that wrought by -Hephaistos on the shield of Achilles; the fact that the very word to -'embellish' is taken from his name, points less to a distinct person -than to the period in which Greek art began to free itself from Asiatic -bondage. - -The historical periods into which we may group Greek sculpture -correspond to those of their architecture. - -First period, from the 8th century B.C. to the Persian wars, 470 B.C. - -Second period, from Kimon to the end of the Peloponnesian war, 470 -B.C.-400 B.C. - -Third period, from the delivery of Athens to the conquest of Greece -by the Romans, 400 B.C.-146 B.C. This third period comprises Greek -sculpture in its decline. - -Struggle into existence, growth and development, acme and decline, -follow in rapid succession. Wood-carvers and potters begin; then we -have a transition to bronze-works under _Glaukos_, who was the first to -solder the separate parts of the statues, which prior to him had been -always beaten into union. Following up this improvement, the artists -of Samos succeeded in making a clay-model, and then in covering it -with the fluid metal. As if by a supernatural charm the bright metal -statue grew out of the gloomy clay, and formed an everlasting monument -to adorn temples, squares, and streets. _Rhoekos_ and _Theodorus_ of -Samos, with _Smilis_, built the Labyrinth at Lemnos, which they adorned -with 150 columns, which were turned out by an ingenious mechanism, an -improvement on the art of casting in bronze. Pliny describes a bronze -figure by _Theodorus_, which held in its right hand a file, and in its -left a quadriga with a charioteer, which was so small that the car, -with the four horses and the driver, could be covered by the wing of -a fly. The celebrated ring of Polykrates, admirably wrought gold and -silver sacrificial vessels, and a vine with golden leaves and grapes -of precious stones, were also attributed to this artist. At Chios, the -birth-place of Glaukos, the family of _Melas_ worked for the first -time in Parian marble; whilst _Byzes_ of Naxos cut marble into thin -slabs for architectural purposes, giving a more exquisite finish to the -houses of the gods. On every side a marked improvement took place. The -head-dress of Apollo was still that of the Egyptian sphinx. The faces -of the statues were placid, mask-like, as if modelled separately and -then fixed on; the eyes looked as if first cut out, and then placed -into their sockets; but the anatomy of the body was treated with -greater care and a more refined feeling. The legs were close together -and the arms hung down perpendicularly, with a prescribed stiffness, -but there were details in the treatment of the stone surface, which -promised well for the future of Greek art, and the promise was most -faithfully kept. - -The struggling art freed itself from the fetters of stern canons. -Custom, struck by the lightning of genius, had to vanish, and life, -truth, and beauty as essential elements ruled the Greek mind. To -blend the isolated perfections of the two sexes into one became the -aim of Greek art. Women were sculptured with the colder lines of -manly firmness, and men received gentler forms through a less angular -treatment. The artists conscientiously purified their works from all -passions and second thoughts, expressing nothing that could divert -the mind from the simple admiration of idealised nature. At this -period they only succeeded in animating the limbs of their statues: -action was expressed with great power in strained muscles and swelling -veins. The faces were still without life, and without a comprehension -of those emotions which vibrate electrically in the countenances of -excited humanity. They could not yet petrify the thinking soul, but -they undoubtedly already succeeded in sculpturing the animated body to -perfection. - -The _second_ period was ushered in by the versatile and productive -talents of Onatas, Ageladas, Kalamis, Iphikrates, Pythagoras of Regium, -and Myron. Greece had attained her independence, the Persian hordes of -despotism were vanquished, and Athens enjoyed her hegemony. Freedom -and national exultation produced Sokrates, Plato, and Anaxagoras in -philosophy; Kimon, Perikles, and Themistokles in politics; Aeschylus, -Sophokles, and Euripides in dramatic poetry; and Pheidias, Praxiteles, -and Skopas in sculpture. If we add to this fourfold triad Herodotus, -Thukydides, and Xenophon, we have given an array of names each of -which singly would have filled the world with its fame, and become a -landmark in the progressive development of humanity. Athens was at -this period the most brilliant centre of intellectual and artistic -life. Men were inspired by the general animation; they began to modify -old thoughts, to transform eidola, and to give birth to numberless -productions which in beauty and striving for truth surpassed anything -attempted before. Schools of arts vied with the schools of wrestlers, -poets, and thinkers, and all excited the dramatists to their grand -conceptions, which again reacted on plastic art. Under these influences -the imaginary theogony yielded to a more scientific inquiry into -the origin of all things, which led to the recognition of the first -incomprehensible, immutable, eternal cause, no longer based on mere -belief, but on the immovable rock of scientific conviction. No wonder -that art was also inspired by this spiritual movement. The conceptions -of the priests and philosophers were to be loudly proclaimed in visible -forms, and the sculptor, from a deep feeling of veneration for the -Supreme Artist of the Universe, became the expounder of the divinity, -and the exclusive high priest of beauty and truth. Instead of singing -Vedantic hymns or Egyptian psalms and litanies to the glory of God, -the Greek sculptors hewed the gods in majestic forms, and every touch -of their chisels on the lifeless marble, every blow of their hammers, -became an eternally resounding prayer in honour of God. - -Wood, metal, clay, precious stones, and marble had by degrees yielded -to the creative power of the Greek masters; and matter could no longer -resist in any way their ruling intellectual force. At this moment, -under these circumstances, Pheidias, the son of Charmides of Athens, -the pupil of Hegias and Ageladas, stepped forward, and was raised by -the superiority of his genius to the dignity of king of Greek plastic -art. The Zeus of Olympia and the Athene of the Parthenon qualified -Pheidias as _the_ sculptor of the concrete _form_ of the divinity; -for if the father of the gods had had a visible form, and his wisdom -and intellect had been incarnate in Athene, both must have looked as -they were sculptured by Pheidias. In symbolic emblems he poetically -expressed the powers of the two divinities; and used the mineral, the -vegetable, and animal kingdoms to glorify their power. - -Nothing is left us of these two master-pieces but the glowing -descriptions of those who saw and admired them. That which a -combination of thousands of our artists, with all our technical -advancement, can scarcely accomplish; the drawing of thousands and -thousands of _intellectual_ human beings together to admire their works -of art; was done by Pheidias. Men flocked from all parts of the world -to see and admire his statues, and to offer fervent thanks to the -Father of all for having endowed one of his creatures with the power to -give a correct form to Homer's lines: - - He (Zeus) spoke, and awful bends his sable brows; - Shakes his ambrosial curls and gives the nod, - The stamp of fate, and sanction of the god; - High heaven with trembling the dread signal took, - And all Olympus to the centre shook. - -We possess in the Vatican a copy of the original head of the Jupiter, -and what a master-piece even this _bad_ copy is! What a power in the -bold, arched brows; the large eyes with their benevolent, forgiving, -and yet commanding glance; the full, parted lips ready to bless -and to forgive; the luxuriant beard, the mighty locks inspiring -veneration, and the beautifully-rounded cheeks, expressive of creative -force and eternal manly beauty! The independent works of Pheidias -were very numerous. Besides the two colossal divinities of bronze -(Athene Promachos, 50 feet high, and Athene {he Lemnia}), we find -twelve others mentioned: of these, six were statues of Athene; one -colossal Apollo of bronze, 70 feet high; one marble Hermes; three of -Aphrodite (two of marble, and one of ivory and gold); a mother of the -gods, material unknown; and an Asklepios (Aesculapius) of gold and -ivory. Of sacrificial statues, a group of thirteen bronze figures, in -commemoration of the victory of Marathon, is mentioned as having been -executed by him. In this work twelve mythical characters surrounded -_one_ historical figure--that of Miltiades; a proof that the Greeks -attributed their victory far more to the help of the gods than to the -exertions of their leaders. They were much more inclined to adorn -the courts of their temples and their public places with the statues -of orators, wrestlers, poets, artists, and philosophers, than with -those of men who, in defending their country against invading hordes -of barbarians, did their duty and nothing more. What a scope for our -artists if we were to adorn our town-halls, courts of justice, our -museums, universities, academies, public places, and churches with the -statues of those who had devoted their energies to religion, oratory, -science, art, politics, and the general welfare of their country! If -gratitude were to prompt us to do this, and not childish vanity or -egotistical pride, we should shortly have many Pantheons with excellent -sculptures. - -In no town in Europe can the artist study the sculptural splendour -of ancient Greece with greater ease than in London. Of the ninety-two -metopes which adorned the Parthenon on the Akropolis at Athens we -possess seventeen; of the frieze of the cella 3-1/5 feet high and -524 feet long, representing the Panathenaic procession, we possess -fifty-three plates and casts of the whole western side. In all -these sculptures what a clear power of grouping, what a variety of -characters, what handsome men and women! The flower of Athens is seen -assembled to do homage in joyous excitement to the supreme divinity of -the State, the embodiment of wisdom and intellect. Some are crowned -with wreaths; others carry sun-shades, chairs, splendid pitchers, -ornamented vases, or decorated pateras; some are ready to start; -others, preparing in animated haste to take their places, are in the -act of mounting their prancing horses, or, already mounted, eagerly -await the arrival of their friends. On the eastern side, under the -entrance to the temple, there was an admirable group of gods and -goddesses, in whose presence _peplus_, or sacred veil, is delivered to -the authorities of the temple; animals are led to be sacrificed--flute -and kythara-players follow. Amongst the hundreds and hundreds of -figures not one is like the other; the exquisite variety in the folds -of the dresses of the sitting, standing, walking, riding, driving -groups is in general unsurpassed for beauty of design, and perfection -of execution. None of the figures are raised more than _three_ inches -from the background, and yet the most correct perspective is observed. -There is such a softness and truthfulness, such a firmness and ideal -vitality in this frieze, that we may at least attribute the composition -to Pheidias himself. Some plates of the western side are less excellent -in execution; the forms are marked with roughness and dryness, and some -faults in the outlines are also apparent to the critic. Some of the -horses have legs too long, and bodies too thin; in one of the horses, -which is bending its neck to rub its head against one of its fore feet, -the curves are much too stiff. The execution of these reliefs must have -been left to some inferior artist. What we must admire is, that there -are so few faults. The correct study of this frieze ought to serve us -as an example in grouping, and would teach us how to arrange a marble -strip round some monument for the sake of decoration. Little of this -influence, however, is to be observed in our sculptors. We intend -to evolve sculpture from our own inner consciousness, and neglect -these ancient books with their glorious poems in Pentelic marble; we -prefer '_going to nature_' as the popular phrase runs, and ignore or -despise the study of the antique. Now the Greeks had an opportunity of -going to real nature--not with the darkened eye of Asiatic prejudice, -despising matter and exalting _spirit_--but with a prejudice in the -very opposite direction, cultivating spirit only so far as it served -to embellish and to reproduce form. In this they attained perfection, -and to surpass them in sculpture is after all impossible; we can only -try to equal them, and to learn from what they have left us, to produce -other combinations. In this spirit we ought to study the nine figures -from the eastern pediment of the Parthenon, in the British Museum. -What forms, what exquisite drapery! The finest tissue of pliable -stuff is reproduced in hard Pentelic marble. The drapery disguises, -and at the same time reveals, the beautiful forms of the human frame. -Softness and sensationalism were equally avoided by Pheidias and his -school. The study of anatomy was not yet degraded to coarse realism. -It was not yet the aim of Greek sculptors to distort the human body -so as to exhibit expanded muscles, over-strained sinews, and swelling -veins, as expressions of pain, grief, distress, or contortions of -the death-agony. Anatomy served Pheidias as a mould, into which he -poured his beautiful conceptions--the spiritualised forms of gods and -men. Katharsis was the principle of his school. The very heights of -perfection were reached by Pheidias, Polykletus, and Alkemenes. Gods -and goddesses were the subjects of their chisels. They were not only -the high-priests of art--but inspired prophets, to whom divine beauty -was revealed in all its brightness and splendour. - -The existence of the Greek State was suddenly shaken to its very -foundation. Internal dissensions weakened the safety of the citizens; -sophistry destroyed philosophy, and mannerism grasped Greek art, -dragged it down from its heights of idealised beauty and hurled it -into the abyss of sensational realism. The best specimen of this -school is the frieze from the temple of Apollo at Bassae, near Phigalia -in Arkadia. (Found 1812, now in the British Museum.) It represents -Kentaurs fighting with Amazons. The old Indian Ghandarvas, the moist -and heavy clouds that hinder the sun from breaking forth in all his -glory, and are conquered by his fiery shafts, became in time monsters, -half-men, half-horses, fighting against loveliness and civilisation. -The Amazons in this instance represent fair Greece rushing into civil -strife. Passion is predominant in action and expression. Amazons are -dragged by the hair and by the legs from their horses; a Kentaur is -seen biting a warrior in the shoulder. Bold naturalism and vulgar -realism go hand-in-hand in these sculptures. How sensitive art is--how -faithfully it reflects the social condition of a nation! and the -feelings by which the artists were pervaded may be studied in this -frieze. The nude is treated with exquisite truthfulness, but there is -heaviness in the sudden, too violent movements. Action and expression -lose the balance of the symmetrical. The women are common; their -drapery floating and yet stiff, deranged for the sake of effect. The -artists worked no more with love and security. The political party -spirit troubled their imagination. The chisel trembled with rage or -fear, with hatred or passion, in their hands; they saw prophetically -the national downfall of their country, and with it science, art, -poetry, and philosophy were to be rendered for thousands of years -houseless and homeless. - -Once more art revived under Skopas, Praxiteles, and Lysippus, but in -a totally different shape. Greece had lost through her civil war the -proper balance between her moral and intellectual forces. Simplicity -and refinement of thought had vanished. In literature metaphors -prevailed; in politics Aristides had to yield to the double-tongued -Alkibiades; in tragedy Sophokles was superseded by Euripides; in -sculpture the immortal Pheidias was followed by Praxiteles. The -national spirit of the Greeks, inspired by common interests, swayed by -the very highest aspirations in arts and sciences, suddenly collapsed -into a narrow-minded, particularising egotism. Tribes cared only -for tribes, parties for parties. The public buildings began to be -neglected, whilst the private dwellings gained in ornamentation and -comfort, what was denied to the grand national enterprises. The public -places were no longer adorned with the statues of those who had gained -the general approbation of the masses. The artist, doubtful whom to -please, tried to please everyone, or to satisfy the individual fancy -of a paying patron. Art was no more the chaste virgin sacrificing to -beauty, but became a courtesan seeking general and special favour -at all hazards. The divinities were no more the representations of a -spiritual eidolon, but a glowing sentiment of sensual love was poured -over their frames; they were no longer ideal conceptions in marble, but -beautiful flesh forms in stone or bronze. They lost all generalisation, -they were more correct in the anatomical outlines, but a passionate -sentiment of sensuality thrilled through every point. Kephisodotus -(the elder), probably the father of Praxiteles, embodied the change in -Greek thought in a beautiful group. Eirene (peace) fondles the child -Pluton (riches)--a splendid allegorical representation of the political -condition of Greece at this time. 'Let us put an end to our quarrels; -let us have peace, and enjoy life once more.' - -Skopas, born on the island of Paros, expressed the modern flow of ideas -in Greece with greater clearness. Violent scenes of deadly struggle -filled the pediments of the temple of Athene Alea at Tegea. In front, -the hunt of the Kalydonian boar by Herakles, at the back Achilles -fighting with Telephos was represented. An under-current of thought, -a kind of allegory, may be traced in this composition, for the boar -to be hunted was the opposition. Art was no longer to exalt the mind -unconditionally, but to fulfil another purpose--to irritate, to excite -to hatred, and to arouse passion; thus placed, art must lose its -civilising influence, and it did this step by step. Even the divinities -sculptured by Skopas were not to inspire veneration, but to please -by little allegorical additions; his Apollo (Smintheus) stood on a -mouse; Apollo, the leader of the muses, the representative of vivifying -light in art, science, and the universe, degraded to a beautiful -'_mouse-killer_.' Aphrodite, the mother of humanity, was sculptured -sitting on a goat--the vilest emblem of passion in union with the -purest eidolon of tender love. Another Apollo was represented in the -long waving robes of an elegant Grecian lady playing the lyre; this was -still more objectionable. Though the drapery excites our admiration -by its exquisite softness and finish, the statue appears to have been -chiselled to show the artist's skill in carving a heap of waving -drapery. Whenever art condescends to such tricks it is on the high-road -to degradation. Skopas composed a splendid group for a pediment, -representing Achilles receiving from his mother the arms forged by -Hephaistos. The principal figures are Thetis, the queen of the bright -green waves, Poseidon, and Achilles; they are surrounded by a crowd of -Nereids and Tritons, all in harmonious arrangement. Richer in grouping -are some marble reliefs (now in the Glyptothek at Muenich), representing -the wedding of Poseidon and Amphitrite. The mother of the bride, Doris, -is seated on a Hippokamp (sea-horse), holding two torches towards the -couple; Tritons play on shells and lyres a merry wedding tune. Nereids -surround them. One rides on a sea-bull, led by a mischievous-looking -Eros, standing on its left fore-foot; another, mounted on a fantastic -sea-monster, is accompanied by another, borne by a Triton; other -Nereids follow, pointing towards the principal group, one sitting -on a Hippokamp, with an Eros on its curled tail; a dragon carrying -a Nereid is led with self-conscious pride by another Eros, whilst a -Triton carries another sea-nymph on his winding body with placid and -contented looks. The composition in general, and in all its details, -is perfect. Without over-crowding the allotted space, it could not be -better filled up. There is a striking freedom in the lines, and lively -contrast of forms. We may consider this relief the prototype of all -those fantastic compositions of the pure renaissance style, in which we -see dragons and monsters, bulls and horses, entwined with plants and -flowers, nymphs and gods, everything real and imaginary, beautiful and -graceful, united into one great dissonant harmony. Skopas was the first -(so far as we know) who sculptured Venus in the full beauty of her nude -body. Pheidias would have considered such a treatment of the mother -of mankind blasphemy. In a group of Eros, Himeros, and Pothos (Love, -Longing, and Desire), we find a classification of a general feeling -into three distinct subdivisions, executed with conscious discernment -in order to produce a sensational effect. A raving Bacchante appears to -rush away with dishevelled hair, in flowing robes; the head is thrown -backwards in delirious delight; the marble lives and breathes maddening -joy, but is vivified with sensual feelings, and not inspired with the -elevating spirit of artistic simplicity and purity. - -Of this period we may study another master-piece in the British Museum; -the frieze of the tomb of Mausolos at Halikarnassus. The greater part -is in London and the remainder at Genoa. The subject is a battle -between Greeks and Amazons. The composition is nearly as good as -that on the Parthenon. There is a continuous symmetrical stream of -action and reaction, as in the dashing waves of a stormy sea. _Skopas_ -worked the eastern, _Bryaxis_ the northern, _Timeotheos_ the southern, -and _Leochares_ the western side. Many mistakes may be found in the -details, but the whole is a master-piece of manly thought;--it may be -said to have been the _last manly_ product of the period. - -_Praxiteles_ altogether turned the scale; Aphrodite, Demeter, -Persephone, Flora, Eros, Dionysius, and Apollo, are the divinities -mostly sculptured by him. Everything is smooth, young, and effeminate. -All harshness of line is avoided, all loftier ideas discarded. The -flesh become stone is placed before us in charming and full roundness. -Aphrodite was no longer draped--but with the concealing drapery the -higher conception of the divinity fled. Venus, conscious of her charms, -with a smile on her lips, and a coquettish movement of her hand, sinks -to the level of an every-day woman. Venus had eaten of the tree of -knowledge; with the consciousness of her particular womanly charms the -ideal of divine universality was gone. - -We possess of Praxiteles, an Eros in the Vatican, and his celebrated -Apollo with the lizard (Saurokthonos) in the Louvre. Both these statues -are more women than men. The lines are too soft; the bodies as though -without muscles or bones, composed only of flesh and fat. It is true -that the older artists also softened down the too marked lines of the -sexes, and in blending them together created ideal forms of beauty; but -now the mere surface of the woman's body was used for both sexes, to -affect the senses exclusively. - -Three groups (the one probably for the pediment of a temple, the other -two forming independent works of art) deserve special mention. - -The group of Niobe and her dying children, attributed to Skopas or -Praxiteles. Greece was fast sinking. _Niobe-Greece_ sees her children -struck down one after the other by the inexorable decree of the -gods, who are bent on punishing the _proud mother_ who only cared -for the _outward_ beauty of her children, and neglected their moral -_inner_ grandeur. Niobe, amidst a harmonious confusion of misery and -endless woe, stands erect, and presses the youngest child to herself, -turning her proud looks upwards, her eyes filled with tears of heroic -resignation--for she knows the gods have willed her downfall, and -their will is unalterable. This moment of agony, of mental rather than -bodily suffering, makes the group a master-piece of antique beauty and -grandeur. - -This cannot be said of the sensational Laokoon, the joint work of -Agesander, Athenodorus, and Polydoros (of which there is a copy in -the Vatican), and the so-called 'Farnese Bull,' the joint work of -Apollonios and Tauriskos (a copy of which exists in the museum at -Naples). Bodily anguish is the dominating element in these two groups. -If it were the province of art to depress the soul, and to fill us with -pain and horror, nothing could surpass the technical skill with which -these two are arranged. - -In the first we have:-- - -1. In the father a stifled _death scream_. - -2. In the younger son, to the right, the last _convulsions_ of a dying -boy. - -3. In the elder son, to the left, an unbounded _horror_ at witnessing -the frightful death of father and brother. - -There is no psychological necessity in this group to indemnify us for -the pathological and anatomical truthfulness of so great an amount of -horrible suffering. Art has never to serve as a hospital ward, and to -force us to witness the contortions of a poor family dying poisoned -by strychnine or arsenic. Not less objectionable is the revenge of -a mother and her two sons on a defenceless woman. In this group we -have:-- - -1. The horror-stricken, half-dying, half-imploring look of poor Dirke. - -2. The merciless glance of the jealous Antiope, wrapt in placid -satisfaction to see herself revenged on her rival. - -3. The ferocious anger of the two passionate sons; and, lastly, - -4. The wild look of the furious bull, ready to dash the beautiful frame -of a frail woman to pieces. Dramatic justice is here meted out by the -artist in a most revolting way. A bull is called in to help to punish; -it is the vulgarity of the cruel revenge that degrades the technically -masterly work of art. The free grouping of marble statues is one of the -most difficult tasks, and was never attempted during the classic period -of ancient art. A mixture of men and animals is even more to be avoided. - -As soon as the gods of Egypt changed their architectural and monumental -position, they lost their sway over the superstitious masses; as soon -as the Greeks lost that balance of morality, which, in the form of the -beautiful, regulated their life, science, and art, they lost at the -same time their productive power. Form and idea as in Asia came into -conflict; the _formal_ had attained the extreme of perfection, and the -new _ideas_ had not yet ripened. - -Art was either to touch the feelings or to speak to reason--it was -to be based on a mere imitation of nature, or to be the expression -of some thought in some form. This 'either,'--'or,'--or this -'neither,'--'nor,' which divided art-critics during this period, made -an end of art altogether. The Asiatics rent the universe asunder -with conflicting abstractions based on the phenomena of nature; the -Greeks lost their power, when they once recognised that there was -something higher than the mere _form_. A new sphere was felt to open -new spiritual beauties--but this sphere was to be attained through -totally different means. The formal was however so highly developed by -the Greeks that we shall see the new spirit, after more than a thousand -years, become incarnate in those forms. - -We see then clearly that art, the product of the creative force of -men, requires a certain moral and intellectual condition, under which -alone it can actively live. Change the moral temperature through the -superstitions of a terrified populace, the aspect of nature, the -despotic organisation of government, or the rule of a wild, uneducated -mob, and the artistic force will also change or die out altogether. The -artist acts only to a certain degree on the public; the public reacts -with a greater combined _vis inertiae_ on the artist, who is merely the -reflection of certain ideas floating in the intellectual atmosphere -around him. Is a man who sees nothing but emaciated, beggarly, or -sanctimonious faces, thin limbs, hungry looks, dwellings bare of -all domestic comfort, decayed brick-houses and crumbling walls, to -paint convivial scenes of happiness and joy? Or let him change this -atmosphere and live in a sphere of so-called respectability; having -always the same bland smile before him, the same trimmed whiskers, the -same business-like self-contentment, the same stiff collars and cuffs; -hearing the same stereotyped, insignificant phrases about the weather -or the funds, the price of coals or meat--will he, influenced by such -an atmosphere, not draw or paint only caricatures, and never grand -and heart-stirring historical paintings, recording in glowing colours -scenes full of life, excitement, passion, and dramatic action? In such -surroundings it is necessary for an artist to create for himself a -world of his own--an intellectual world--by turning to the glorious -records of the past, and devoting every spare hour to the study of -the ancients and the reading of history. His imagination, deadened -by reality, must be fed and nourished by the poets, poetry, works of -art, and historical facts of the past. Our meagreness and poverty in -artistic productions take their origin in our unpardonable neglect -of the study of history; through this neglect we have deprived art -altogether of its firmest basis. - -The very moment that the Greek artists lost their historical and -poetical ground, they took to and excelled in painting barbers' and -shoemakers' shops; oyster shells, vases, little combinations of chairs -and musical instruments, and small things, with great accuracy. In -fact the same causes produced the same pictorial effects; the mind -of the Greek nation had dwindled, and their works of art embraced -decorations of household furniture and pottery. In these ornamentations -the reminiscences of a by-gone age may be traced; they are still -symmetrical to the highest degree, plants are still treated with -great conventional freedom, but the Greeks only worked as skilful -workmen--artists they produced no more. - - - - -CHAPTER IX. - -ETRUSKAN ART. - - -The first question that here suggests itself is, who were the -Etruskans? Their name Tuskan, from Tuisko, points at once to an Aryan -branch of Teutonic race. But ethnologists differ. Some say they were -Phoenicians, others assert they were Egyptians; some that they were -pure Teutons, and others that they were pure Kelts. Taking their old -pottery into consideration, as given in Lord Hamilton's admirable -plates, or in the collection of the Museum at Clusium (Chiusi), we are -induced to pronounce the aborigines of Etruria to have been Turanians, -conquered by immigrant Aryans. This mixture of Aryans and Mongols under -the influence of a totally different aspect of nature, on a different -soil, under different social and religious conditions, produced a type -quite different from the Greek--a kind of transition link between the -Pelasgians and the Romans. - -Two distinct immigrations of Aryans into Etruria are recorded. The -first about 1650 B.C., when Pelasgians and Thyrrenians settled amongst -the aborigines; and the second, 400 years before Herodotus, about the -times of Thales and Lykurgus. Of the first immigration we have scarcely -any relics; the second time the immigrants succeeded in forming an -organised social state; they brought with them Greek mythological -notions, and a kind of Greek writing. Their language and writing -died out after Augustus, and disappeared altogether before Julian, -fourth century A.D. Nature forced them to industry and enterprise. -The Etruskans had to cultivate their fields by individual exertion; -in spring they had to ward off the devastating waters of overflowing -rivers, and in summer they had to provide water for their parched -valleys. They consequently became masters in constructing aqueducts and -irrigating the land, at an early period. - -Their mythology was composed of Assyrian, Persian, and Egyptian -notions, strongly tinged with gloomy superstitions. Petrifactions of -the most astonishing forms abound in the plains where they settled. -Near Cortona the bones of a whale have been found. The Arno valley -resembles a vast elephant burial-place; and the bones of the mastodon, -rhinoceros, and hippopotamus, are scattered broadcast all over old -Etruria, and are still used to fence in the fields. Besides the bones -of these huge monsters, those of hyaenas, panthers, bears, and wolves -are found in such abundance, that the peasants to this very day believe -they grew like mushrooms over night, having been sown by invisible -spirits to give the poor the trouble of picking them up. The aspect -of nature and the remains of an antediluvian world gave the Etruskan -priesthood an irresistible sway over the minds of the people. Whilst in -Greece, under the influence of a happy aspect of nature, the Indian, -Assyrian, and Egyptian embodiments of the forces of nature lost their -fearful forms; in Etruria they gained even more gloomy and melancholy -figures in the presence of everlasting thunder and lightning, and -volcanic disturbances. - -The Etruskans had two sets of gods. - -_a._ The veiled gods, with '_Asar_' at their head, representing the -cosmognical forces of nature; especially fire, water, earth, and ether, -like the divinities of India and Egypt. - -_b._ Twelve lower divinities presiding over the order of existing -and visible things. Their gods have a great resemblance to those of -the Scandinavians, uniting in one distinct chain the Aryans on the -Ganges, those on the Nile, and those round the Delphic oracle, with the -Hyperboreans of the farthest north. They all believed in an 'inferno,' -only with the Greeks this was an Elysium, a land of shadows, a land of -happiness. The divinities of the Etruskans were phantoms of horror. -The whole of their creed was devoid of a comforting union between gods -and men. This despairing faith impressed the people with a ferocious -character. Their art under such impressions never could reach the -beautiful. A tribe of whom it has been said that their priests -attacked the Romans with hissing serpents and burning torches--a tribe -that crouched in fear before invisible gods, and hated every other -tribe--could never take an interest in the gentler emotions produced by -poetry or art. They remembered the Greek expedition against Thebes, and -adorned their _burial_ urns with scenes from the battle at Marathon; -they commemorated the heroic deed of a ploughman, who, in the midst of -the battle, took up his plough and drove the Persians before him like -a flock of frightened sheep, whilst the Greeks remembered the deed in -mentioning _Echetlos_ in connection with Marathon, but possessed no -record of the fact on any of their monuments. The Etruscans, however, -delighted in such scenes. At their funerals they had no dances, but -sanguinary fights. - -No less than twelve different thunderbolts were known to them. They -believed in a thunderbolt of prophecy, one of authority, one of law, -one of wish, one of admonition, one of approval, one of help, one of -prosperity, one of falsehood, one of plague, one of threats, and one -of murder. Every transaction in life, with the best or the worst of -mankind, might have been accompanied by an approving or disapproving -thunder-clap. They firmly believed the thunderbolts used by the Supreme -Deity were all manufactured in the fiery interior of Mount Aetna. They -possessed no ritual of the dead like the Egyptians, but a thunderbolt -ritual. Every day of the year that brought thunder had its special -signification. All the veiled gods, and _nine_ of the secondary gods, -had the power of thundering. - -Their conception of angry, jealous, persecuting, thundering, and -lightning divinities has much in common with the Jewish and Phoenician -ideals of the Supreme Deity. This peculiarity the Northerns shared in -their conception of Thor. The Etruskan belief, that aerolites were -thunderbolts sent by the angels against the Titans, has a great analogy -with the Persian legends assuming these to have been hurled by the -Fervers against the Devas. - -Their superior divinities are, like the kings or priests of Persia, -Assyria, and Babylon, provided with wings. Jupiter, Diana, Minerva -(a kind of female Mercury with the Etruskans, who had wings not only -on her shoulders, but also on her feet) and Venus were all winged; -others, like Proserpina (Persephone), Amor (Eros), and the Furies, had -wings on their heads. White and black winged genii (angels and demons) -are plentiful in the subterranean tombs of the old Etruskan town, -Tarquinium. According to Dempster, their cars even are often provided -with wings. What was a metaphor with the Greeks was turned by the -Etruskans into matter-of-fact. Euripides in his 'Orestes' speaks of the -winged car of Phoebus, and on some Eleusian coins Ceres is seen sitting -in a winged car, drawn by two serpents. - -From a gloomy contemplation of supernatural matters the Etruskans -turned their minds to extremely worldly and practical purposes. -They wished to secure their towns and to protect them against real -and imaginary monsters, and they constructed excellent walls and -most comfortable houses. The '_cavoedium_' ('cavum oedium'), with the -_impluvium_ and _compluvium_ (the one for collecting and the other for -preserving water), was altogether an Etruskan invention, and was called -by the Romans who adopted it, _Tuscanicum_. They constructed temples -differing only in some details from those of the Greeks. The cella was -generally _square_; sometimes they had more than one cella; one in the -Postica and one in the Antica (the rear and front of the temple). The -portico was often filled with columns. The architectural style was a -rough and primitive Doric. They never attained the majestic simplicity -which distinguished this order in Greece. The columns had a base, were -more slender (about fourteen moduli), stood more apart, and supported a -wooden roof with clumsily-protruding beams, an unwieldy cornice, and a -high pediment. - -Cinerary chests they had in abundance with divinities on them, worked -in reliefs of a decidedly Egyptian type. They used brazen tablets -representing Osiris and Isis. Little clay figures were put into the -graves to protect the dead. Amongst these has been found a winged -Harpokrates or Horus, with the fore-finger of one hand on his lips, a -lotus on his head, and a cornucopia in his other hand. - -Their ancient pottery is more in the Egyptian than the Greek style. -Their jars represent sphinxes and women; their drinking cups are in -the form of human legs, with human faces replacing the knee; some are -in the form of Mercury with a pointed, attached beard, like those -to be seen in Egyptian divinities. Some of the patterns of their -ornamentation, in general as well as in detail, are perfectly Mexican. -On one of their lamps we have a winged Kentaur holding a rabbit, whilst -four rabbits running after one another, form the spirited ornamentation -of the border, intermixed with triangles, rosettes, or solar circles. - -With their religious notions, it is not surprising that the Etruskans -should have devoted the greatest care to their tombs and burial-places. - -These tombs were:-- - -1. _Subterranean_; hewn into the tufa on plains. Steps led underground, -where a vestibulum, consisting of several chambers, sometimes provided -with columns, led into the vault. The ceiling of this was either -horizontal or pointed, in imitation of a wooden roof. Many such tombs -are found at Volci, Clusium, and Volaterra. - -2. A second species of their subterranean tombs consisted of those -_provided with tumuli_ above-ground; simple graves as found in -Scandinavia and the north of the Western hemisphere, the corpses lying -on simple stone beds. - -3. _Burial chambers_ (cucumella) with artificial hills above them, and -provided with a tower-like construction, or with conical columns. They -are found near Volci, Tarquinii, and Viterbo. - -4. _Chambers, vertically hewn into the rocks_, with a simple or -decorated entrance near Tuskania. - -5. Rock-hewn chambers _with facades screening the entrance_, as at -Aria, or with Doric fronts as at Orchia. Asia furnished patterns for -the decoration and construction of these tombs. The reliefs are full -of lively scenes, reminding us of Assyrian and Babylonian sculptures. -The figures are heavy, the legs short and thick; the upper part of the -statues is placed 'en face,' whilst the legs and feet are in profile. -The monstrous element predominates. Harpies, chimeras, winged lions, -sphinxes, and griffins abound; but they are void of any symmetrical -arrangement, and are dry, stiff, and as revolting as possible in their -coarse outlines. - -With regard to the construction of their walls it is remarkable that -they improved very early on the Kyklopean mode, and constructed the -very best regular freestone walls. They had arched gates, built with -wedge-shaped stones, which produced by their span a firmly-vaulted -construction. The Etruskans thus acquired a lasting merit in the -history of art by the new epoch which they inaugurated with the -introduction of this decidedly progressive element in the technical -construction of architectural works. As _potters_ and _metal-workers_ -they distinguished themselves more than either as architects or -sculptors. As the Chinese are considered as the potters _par -excellence_ of the farthest East, the Etruskans may be called the -potters of the West. In burning, painting, and fashioning clay they -appear to have acquired a speciality, so that their trade in vases -extended all over the then known world, and even the Greeks furnished -their houses with Etruskan pottery in preference to their own. The -gloomy mythology of the Etruskans was far better suited to potters, -manufacturing black vases with red figures, or red vases with black -figures, or for casting dark bronze figures, than to sculptors handling -white marble. They also distinguished themselves in chiselling and -founding metal. Innumerable chests, candelabra, metal frames for -looking-glasses, and other utensils show their cleverness in working -gold, silver, and bronze. Some ivory carvings, described in a report -of the Archaeological Society at Rome, 1862, are of great interest. -They were found at Praeneste (Palestrina), where also silver vessels in -the purest Egyptian style, and an ivory tablet with Assyrian patterns, -were excavated. More important even than these discoveries are four -ivory tablets found at Corneto, showing traces of gilding and painting. -The carvings represent scenes of every-day life, mixed with mystic -figures. We see on the tablets a lady and gentleman sitting at dinner, -served by a little boy; a huntsman chasing game; a kind of sea-divinity -holding in each hand a fish; and a man in a biga driving winged horses. -These figures might have formed representations concerning the zodiac, -namely: the Twins, Sagittarius, Pisces, and the Sun (Phoebus or Horus). -The receding forehead of the driver and his manner of holding the whip -are types which we constantly meet in Egyptian sculptures and reliefs. - -About 660 B.C. Eucheir, Diopos, Eugrammos and Demeratos were driven -from Korinthum into Etruria, and from that date we note a decided -improvement in the artistic productions. The Etruskans began to excel -in terra-cotta and bronze works. Their vases, amphorae, statuettes, -cinerary and mystic chests, prove this. Their mystic chests (cistae -mysticae, corresponding to the quippa-chests of the Mexicans) were made -of embossed bronze. The lids were ornamented with mysterious animals, -and the legs formed of the claws or paws of mythical brutes. Foliage -and Greek frets in good arrangement were also used. Their candelabra -are of a superior design. Other works of art, such as ornamented backs -and handles for mystic mirrors, in gold, silver, or bronze, are of -excellent technical execution. - -There was, however, too much of the aborigine Turanian element left in -the Etruskans. The noble and elevating rhythmus of Greek idealisation -is everywhere wanting. Cooking utensils, small pieces of furniture, -tables, chairs, and couches, aqueducts and viaducts, and even cloacas, -were made and constructed to perfection, but as soon as they attempted -the production of human forms, or of higher works in architecture, -they did not succeed. The heads of their figures are either too small -or too large. The legs are short; the drapery in stiff lines hangs -down with rope-like regularity. Animals are much better executed; -but the human form, in consequence of a scrupulous and constrained -conception, and an exaggerated attention to detail, had a cold, -lifeless appearance, void of all spiritual animation. Their imagination -was one-sidedly directed by nature and religion to take a gloomy and -distorted view of creation, and their products bear this spiritual -stamp. In everything they touched we recognise the Egyptian mythology -with its stifling breath, and the influence of the volcanic ground -on which the Aryans were thrown, amongst a number of superstitious -Turanians. The rumbling, fire-spitting Vesuvius and Aetna worked on the -brains of the new immigrants. The sudden, devastating bursts of fire -and water filled their minds with horror; they were forced to ponder -over the instability of human things. The beauty of the Italian sky, -the exuberant luxury of the vegetation, heightened in them a feeling of -dumb despair. The contrast between life and death was too striking, and -filled the souls of the artists with awe and dread, reflected in their -artistic compositions. - -Their representations were often divided into two distinct -compartments. On one side were scenes from the lower regions. Mantus, -Mania, and furies pursuing the deceased with hammers. Mantus of the -Etruskans, probably a descendant of Radamanthus, was an infernal -divinity. Mania (whose name we have preserved in the words _mania_ -and _maniac_) was the mother of the Lares and persecuted the dead. -Our readers must begin to see whence many of the horrifying scenes -of the middle ages took their origin. On the other side were scenes -from life in the upper regions--joyous, triumphal processions and -festivities. Drunkenness and licentiousness are always twin-sisters of -superstition and bigotry. These arrangements recall the same custom of -dividing subjects in antithetical groups observed in Assyria, where -we find on the slabs hunts in the upper compartments, and joyous -festivities in the row below. The subjects chosen with the Assyrians -were undoubtedly much healthier. Hard work first, and joy and happiness -afterwards. The Etruskans kept to the old Egyptian customs, reminding -man continually of the short duration of his life. The mummy placed -in Egyptian banqueting halls, with the inscription: 'Eat and drink; -such a one wilt thou be,' had a pernicious ethical effect; instead of -sobering man down, it drove him to reckless and despairing gaiety and -extravagance. The Etruskans, though filling their imaginations with -horrors, could never master art in life. They had the savage fondness -for adorning their persons with innumerable trinkets. The desire to -shine conspicuously for the short and uncertain time of their existence -absorbed their artistic endeavours, and this fashion prevails amongst -the peasants in Italy at the present day. The patterns are now filigree -Moresque; in ancient times they were in a clumsy Greek style. To wear a -ring was considered essential to man's and woman's existence. - -This led them very early to cultivate glyptics, or the art of -stone-cutting. The subjects were partly mythological, partly heroic; -the artists delighted in strong muscles, attitudinizing groups, and -theatrical postures. - -In the paintings and mosaics, with which they adorned their burial -chambers, we may distinguish, in reference to their treatment: - -a. An Archaic style; - -b. An Etruskan style. - -A. In the _Archaic Style_ they exhibit a thorough acquaintance with -Greek mythology and classical poetry. Orpheus, Homer, Hesiod and Pindar -furnish the scenes, but the dead play the most conspicuous part. -We have, in another world, festivities in vine bowers and blooming -gardens; processions, gymnastic games and races amongst the departed. -The grouping is spirited so far as variety is concerned, but the -execution is rough, and bare of all higher artistic feeling. - -B. In the _Etruskan Style_, stern simplicity and roughness yield to -a freer treatment of the human form. The thick-set, short figures -are replaced by better drawn and lighter forms; the subjects are -exclusively taken from Etruskan mythology. White and black spirits -(angels and devils), armed with big hammers, are represented as -fighting for the souls of the departed. In one of the graves (see -Dempster and Agincourt) we have a soul hanged, and tormented with iron -instruments, roasting over a brisk fire. In these products, in spite -of the intervention of the Roman period of history, we find the direct -connecting link between the old Assyrian, Egyptian, Etruskan, and early -Christian arts. - -The Etruskans indulged in fantastic conceptions, and rejoiced in forced -and cruel scenes, and in bizarre compositions. Art with them was -exclusively technical. We may arrange their works into the following -five groups:-- - -1. The original _Tuscanica_ (as Strabo has it) or Etruskan works. Heavy -in form and details; dresses very stiff; figures without beards. Of -this group we have many bronze figures, very few sculptures in stone, -some gems, and some very old wall-paintings. - -2. The Oriental group. Imitations of Egyptian, Assyrian, and Babylonian -patterns. Tapestry, for floor and wall-decorations, was much used. The -imitations were good, but without any effort at originality. Remains -plentiful. - -3. Caricatures distinguished by grotesque quaintness. This style -predominates at periods, when nations look upon art as superfluous; -not as one of the most important factors of civilization. Taste -degenerates, and the higher aspirations of art are crippled by -distorted products. The quaint is preferred to the beautiful, and the -dynamic force of the artistic element, driven into this direction, -loses itself in a broad grin at everything sacred and elevated in -State, religion, and science, fostering a deplorable spirit of vulgar -egotism, which looks down upon the sublime exertions of artists, as the -mere vagaries of simpletons or madmen. - -4. Works in the best Greek style, but only in bronze, as frames and -handles of mirrors. Whenever the higher spirit of art is neglected, -the power of the artist is directed to small matters; he serves trade -and nothing but trade. We have in these 'Articles of Etruria' the -prototypes of our 'Articles de Paris.' - -5. Mechanical products, such as helmets, weapons, swords, shields, -hatchets, clubs, wall-breakers, cooking utensils, pots, pans, and -saucers, were of exquisite workmanship, but without any attempt at -artistic forms. The utilitarian incubus is as bad as the hierarchical -canon; both expel all higher aspirations from the realm of art. - -The Etruskans thought, with many of us, that if the house were only -built of dry bricks, the carpet thick, the furniture solid and heavy, -and the knife sharp, it was unnecessary to care for anything else. -Whilst such ideas exist, art, in a higher sense, will remain as little -possible, as it was with the Etruskans. - - - - -CHAPTER X. - -ROMAN ART. - - -The Greeks, from a poetical, artistic, and esthetical, and the Romans, -from a social, legal, and political point of view, are still our -masters. Historical art-critics, and a certain class of writers, who -would wish to see the whole universe one great court of justice with -an infinite variety of crimes, subdivided into felony, misdemeanour, -petty larceny, &c., will never agree as to the place that should be -assigned to the Romans in the world's history. We are bold enough to -assert that the whole of the criminal and sanguinary history of Rome, -with her products in literature and art, might be wiped out, and yet -philosophically, poetically, and artistically, not the slightest gap in -the progressive development of humanity would be found. Socially and -legally, we should be sorry to miss a state, which had a mission of its -own, which, if well understood, may teach us the causes why the gentler -feelings of morality were oppressed, imagination defiled, and every -higher artistic aspiration deadened in Rome. - -From beginning to end, ROMA, read backwards AMOR, was an ambiguous -'state-abstraction,' which absorbed the individual. The State with the -Greeks was a concrete association of freemen. With the Romans, it was -the abstract principle of an imaginary union of heterogeneous citizens. -The Greeks fostered science and art, poetry and philosophy. The Romans -despised science, mocked art, scorned poetry, and never condescended -to trouble themselves about philosophy. The Greeks colonised and -civilised their colonies, which became the free daughters of a free -mother-country, attached to it by the ties of a common worship of -beauty and intellectual enjoyment. The Romans conquered, and the -conquered provinces were to furnish soldiers or labourers, and were -tied by means of despotism to the wheels of the proud state-carriage. -The Greeks humanised; the Romans demoralised and organised. The Greeks -played at soldiers in a spirit of glorious patriotism. The Romans were -soldiers for the sake of conquest, plunder, and vain glory. Spirited -youthfulness was the Greek element. Stern and calculating manliness -the essence of the Roman. The Greek was free in life, in art, in the -worship of his gods, in poetry and philosophy. The Roman was cowed -down in religion, politics and life, by the inexorable despotic -force of legal phantoms, which turned men into mere machines. The -despotism of the East was the despotism of some invisible god, or -some visible ruler; and it often overlooked the individual in its -almighty position. The democracy of Greece gave fair play to individual -talent and genius in art and science; but the Roman self-constituted -aristocracy, or rather triple theocracy, invented the inexorable and -meddlesome monster authority, to which everything was to be sacrificed. -Under the tragi-comical sobriquet, _Salus reipublicae suprema lex_ (in -free translation, 'whatever we in authority find good, is good'), they -committed the blackest crimes, which no historian could venture to -commit to paper in their whole truthfulness. - -This triple theocracy presented itself in the shape of seven mythical -kings; in the form of a nominal republic, which was in reality a -military and theocratic aristocracy; and lastly in the theocracy of the -Caesars, which in course of time was changed into a papal theocracy. - -The Romans had to reverence and submit to theocracy under the form of a -triple authority--the political authority; the paternal authority; and -the legal authority. Wherever the Roman turned to, in that vast empire, -which was bounded in the west by the Atlantic, in the north by the -Rhine and the Danube, in the east by the Euphrates, and in the south by -the deserts of Arabia and Africa, he met his triple crown of authority. -He was confronted by some consul or proconsul, some law, some edict, -some whim or caprice of an invisible something, that always had a -visible _lictor_ at its command with a bundle of sticks, ready for -flogging, or, in urgent cases, with a well-sharpened axe to sever the -head from the trunk. He had to obey a power, with innumerable soldiers, -ready to punish whole provinces if they resisted that ever present, -ever vigilant, and ever-active State abstraction. Whilst in Greece, -the individual man was developed with all his bodily and intellectual -faculties in science and art, Rome disturbed and hindered this -individual development, concentrating the static and dynamic forces of -her citizens on brutal military enterprises. - -Rome, through its theocratical spirit, oppressed the conquered by -the conqueror, the poor by the rich, the 'nihil habentes' by the -'possedentes,' the client by the patron, the plebeian by the patrician, -humanity by priests and gods, and the individual by the State. The -Roman as individual was never a self-acting, self-conscious, and -free-thinking entity, but a mere cipher after the State unit; a wheel -in a large and complicated machine; a drop of water in an ocean; -an atom in the universe. The Greek recognised in the State only an -agglomeration of men like himself; this sum total of citizens had -to serve _him_; the State was to him a means, not an aim. The Greek -demanded of the State that it should protect him in the free and -perfect use of his bodily and intellectual faculties. He was, if he -liked, poet, magistrate, athlete, judge, dancer, philosopher, fighter, -priest, wrestler, tragedian, soldier, or singer; all for his own sake, -without ever becoming an over-regulated or over-regulating pedant. -He worshipped his gods without restraining dogmas; he never allowed -his individuality to be absorbed by some incomprehensible, shapeless, -universal theocracy; his whole scientific and artistic national career -was one glorious struggle against such an accomplishment. All this was -the very reverse with the Romans. That Rome had no art or science of -her own, was the effect of those causes which we have here tried to -sketch in a general way. - -The Romans, like the Greeks, were a mixture of Aryans and Turanians, -with this difference, that with the Greeks the Aryan element -predominated, whilst with the Romans the Turanian, and even the black -elements formed a considerable portion of the national State body. The -Greek element, which, at the time of the earliest formation of the -Roman State, was very powerful, soon became absorbed in the Gallic, -Iberian, African, Egyptian, and Syrian elements. The enervating south -was not counterbalanced by the energetic north, but, on the contrary, -the south predominated; and as in the south-east theocratic despotism -flourished, the same principle was adopted by the Romans, and worked -into a perfect system. - -That the language of the Romans had a common origin with that of -the Greeks, Persians, and Indians is evident from the consideration -even of a few words. The verbs _sum_ (I am), _do_ (I give), and the -words _pater_, _mater_, _frater_, are Sanskrit. The most important -pastoral and agricultural expressions are Sanskrit, showing that a -certain degree of civilisation must have been brought with them by the -settlers, after their separation from their Trans-Himalayan brethren, -when they peopled the shores of the Mediterranean, and occupied that -small coast-land which was probably once connected with the African -continent through Sicily. - -_Pecus_, _sus_, _taurus_, and _canis_ are Sanskrit words. The Sanskrit -_agras_ (meadow) is the Latin _ager_ (Germ. _acker_, acre). The -Sanskrit _kurnu_ (Germ. _korn_, corn, grain) is the Latin _granum_. The -settlers were undoubtedly acquainted with even higher elements of a -steady and civilised life. The Sanskrit word _aritram_ (ship and oar), -survived as _aratrum_ the plough, cutting through the ground like the -aritram through the waves. The Sanskrit _damas_, {domos} is the Latin -_domus_; _naus_ is _navis_; _akshas_ is axis (Germ. _achse_) a coach -or cart; and we have in the Sanskrit _vastra_, the Latin _vestis_ -(vestment), not only a proof of the connection between the Aryans -of the Ganges, and those on the shores of the Tiber, but a living -testimony that the former had left off tattooing their bodies and used -textile fabrics. The Romans were first called Ramnes. Three races may -be said to have furnished the first settlers on the Seven Hills, the -Ramnes, Titians, and Lukeres. From this threefold confederation we have -the word tribuere, tribus (tribe). Later Pelasgians, Sabines, Albans, -Etruskans, and Hellenes joined the first settlers, and formed by -degrees the Roman State. - -As the Britons at one time earnestly believed that they were the -direct descendants of Brutus, the son of Aeneas, we need not wonder that -the Romans should have indulged in the flattering faith that they were -the direct descendants of Aeneas himself. They had scarcely attained a -settled state, when they began to work out their legends and myths, -concerning the divine foundation of their town, which had taken place -under _seven_ kings. - -1. Romulus, a god-man, for he and his brother, Remus, were incarnations -of the war-god Mars and miraculously born of a virgin. Their uncle -Amulius, fearing that they might deprive him of his throne, had them -exposed in the swollen Tiber in a cradle. The river subsided, and the -cradle was caught by a sacred fig-tree at the foot of the Palatine -hill, and a she-wolf had pity on the boys, and suckled them. The -founders of Rome thus mythically imbibed, with their foster-mother's -milk, that savage brutality and thirst for blood which distinguished -the citizens of the Holy City for thousands of years. Romulus and Remus -were found by shepherds, and brought up by them. Subsequently a town -was founded by the twins, and Romulus then killed his brother and ruled -alone. He divided the people into curiae. - -2. Numa Pompilius enlarged the town and introduced a settled form of -worship, not out of piety, but in order to subject the citizens to the -will of the State. - -3. Tullus Hostilius improved upon the theocratical institutions of -Numa, and gave Rome a military organisation, as the secret tool with -which her will was to be enforced throughout a vast part of the globe. - -4. Ancus Martius commanded the citizens to have taste and to beautify -the town, or rather had this done, superintending the improvements -himself. He is stated to have been a grandson of Numa. - -5. Tarquinius Priscus, of a Korinthian family, showed in his very -infancy that he was destined by supernatural influences to become a -benefactor of the chosen people, the Romans. When a tender boy sleeping -in his cradle, his head was surrounded by a brilliant halo of flames. -He conquered many Latin and Sabine towns, and showed himself worthy -of his exalted position. He introduced the golden diadem, the ivory -throne, the sceptre adorned with an eagle, and the purple toga, as -distinctive marks of the supreme authority. - -6. Servius Tullius was also of supernatural origin. He was the son of -a female slave, and the protecting divinity of the royal castle. He -divided the people into five classes or castes; instituted tribunes, -and founded the orders of senators, knights, and commons. - -7. Tarquinius Superbus, like the Chinese tyrant Ly-wang, who succeeded -the five good emperors, defiled the imperial dignity, outraged all -laws, divine and human, and was rebelled against by the patricians, -who abolished the regal authority. The innocent Lucretia is said to -have been the direct cause of the expulsion of the tyrant, and the -establishment of the republic. - -In the myths concerning these seven kings we have abundant elements for -the most beautiful songs, epic poems, and artistic subjects full of -dramatic power and vitality. The remarkable fact with the Romans was, -that they preserved these myths as _historical_ truths, recorded them -in dull _prose_, affixing to them dates, each of which was a flagrant -falsehood, and used them in good earnest as the basis of their national -existence. - -The royal period ended with the seven kings. Rome had prepared in -perfect silence her murderous weapons, and, suddenly dashing forward -a well-trained prize-fighter, inaugurated the military theocracy. The -history of this second period, with its appalling monotony, may be -condensed into one terrible word--WAR. - -From 342-340 B.C. war with the Samnites. From 340-337 B.C. war with -the Latins. From 325-290 B.C. the second and third Latin war. From -288-264 B.C. war with Carthage and Syrakuse. From 264-241 B.C. the -first Punic war. Peace was made, and to fill up the leisure hours, -there was a Gallic war. From 218-201 B.C. the second Punic war. -Peace was again concluded, and during the interval (183 B.C.) Greece -and the Makedonian empire were subjugated. From 149-146 B.C. the -third Punic war. The world was conquered, and the boundaries of the -vast empire extended in all directions; but the warlike spirit of -the Romans had not learnt to rest and to enjoy these conquests in -peace; industry, arts, and sciences, had no charm for these wild and -indomitable conquerors, and wanting a foreign enemy, they quarrelled -amongst themselves. The internal dissensions began. There were the -Numantian troubles, the tumults of the Gracchi, and the feud between -Marius and Sulla. A foreign war happily put an end to these internal -struggles. From 112-106 B.C. war with Jugurtha. From 88-80 B.C. war -with Mithridates. From 72-71 B.C. the slaves rebelled and called for -bread and for revenge. This was the first civil war--individual egotism -conspired against the supreme power, faction fought against faction; -a dissolution of all law and order threatened the State. From 54-51 -B.C. the Gallic war amused the Roman spectators and war-comedians. From -49-48 B.C. there was a second civil war; from 43-30 B.C. a third; and -the republic was at last absorbed by a Caesarian theocracy. - -That arts and sciences did not flourish in a state of continual warfare -is quite natural. The houses were mean and low, here and there adorned -with clumsy Etruskan pillars; the temples had some Greek forms; -sculpture was not cultivated, and Greeks had to chisel or to carve -the scanty embellishments. On the other hand, high roads of great -excellence, and bold bridges with magnificent arches, were constructed, -for everywhere the spirit of practical realism was served; in every -stone, every column, every pillar, every statue, the spirit of -theocratic despotism predominated. The charming gods of the Greeks were -turned into haughty military commanders, not inviting love through -beauty, but demanding blind obedience with a thundering '_sic volo, sic -jubeo_' ('as I will it, so I command it'). - -The period of imperial theocracy showed Rome in her pomp and splendour, -covering inner hollowness and gradual decay with marble slabs. Palaces -and temples, basilicae and arcades, triumphal arches and amphitheatres, -arenas and baths (of the latter Rome alone had about 768), naumachiae -and circuses, theatres and arenas, hippodromes and magnificent tombs -abounded; but in all these architectural marvels, the monumental spirit -of pride, self-glorification, vain ostentation, and theatrical display, -is to be traced; the love of beauty, of artistic moderation, and -simplicity being everywhere conspicuous by its absence. Roman art and -decoration are to be carefully studied, that we may learn 'how not to -do it,' if we earnestly intend to produce works of art, and not works -of ornamentation, forming a very Paradise for 'parvenus' with bad taste. - -We have asserted that the Romans never produced anything original in -art and science. Their religion, their literature, and their products -of art, bear this assertion out to the very letter. - -The word 'religion' is of Roman origin. The Teutons have _faith_ -or trust in God. The Roman word meant the tying down of everyone -to certain formulas or dogmas. They borrowed their dogmas and -superstitions, their gods and ceremonies, from all parts of the world; -especially from the Greeks and Etruskans, and later from the Egyptians. -Everything served their purpose so soon as it helped to overawe the -masses. They had augurs, auspices, and sibylline oracles. From the -entrails of beasts and human beings they predicted the future. Flashes -of lightning, the rolling thunder, the flight of birds, meetings with -hares, goats, dogs, or cats, announced the will of the gods. The -conceptions of the Eastern gods were disfigured, and they were made -more jealous, threatening, merciless, revengeful, and inexorable. -Jupiter the thunderer (Jupiter tonans) did not govern by any moral law, -but by mere force; he spoke in flashes of lightning and in thunder, -in terrifying earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Amongst the 30,000 -deities with which the Roman triple theocracy peopled the visible and -invisible world, there was not ONE divinity of kindness, mercy, and -comfort. - -They had a divinity of peace, to urge them on to war; they had -divinities of plague, hunger, fever, mildew, and death. In their -practical spirit they went even so far as to have a 'Dea Cloacina.' - -What subjects to paint or sculpture! - -A pale-yellow woman with dishevelled hair, protruding ghastly eyes, -wasted lips, fleshless and emaciated limbs, may represent the goddess -of hunger; another woman deliberately and slowly tearing the limbs of -helpless creatures from their bodies with diabolical delight, may be -a goddess of plague; another, placidly playing with human skulls in a -field surrounded by dying men, women, and children, may be the goddess -of death. - -In the illustration of a Dante or a Milton, a knowledge of the Roman -mythology may prove full of suggestive power. - -The Greeks had a principle in their anthropomorphic worship; the Romans -had no aim. Roman high-priests were spiritual butchers, who tried to -appease the angry gods with the smoke of burning bullocks, to nourish -them with fat, with which they literally besmeared the statues, and -to quench their thirst with blood which they poured over the altars. -When already educated enough to consider all these divinities with a -cold and sceptic indifference; when the augurs could no longer meet -without laughing and sneering at each other and their sacred office, -then the Roman mind became eager for a more concrete god than these -stone figures, and they found a corresponding living divinity in the -person of their Emperors. Earth certainly could offer nothing more -divine in the form of visible majesty, recognised and obeyed, as -soon as clothed in the imperial purple and crowned with the imperial -diadem, than the irresponsible 'god-man,' who sat on the throne of -the Caesars. The creative force of the Universe, and the phenomena of -nature, were moulded in visible forms; and now for the first time a -political abstraction had become incarnate in the Emperor _pro tem_. -The hordes of courtiers, courtezans, flatterers, poets, philosophers, -historians, juris consults, orators, praetors, and consuls, supported -by the thoughtless mass of the people, rendered _divine_ honours to -a _mortal_, in whom, however, the _immortal_ principle of theocratic -authority was concentrated. Not even the Egyptians, crouching in -grateful admiration before the crocodiles of the Nile, outraged -humanity to such a degree as these polite Romans, rendering divine -honour to an Emperor, like Aurelius Commodus, who fought 735 times as -a common gladiator in the arena before his enervated people. The Roman -religion was, in fact, a cosmopolitan mixture of all the atrocious -superstitions of the world. - -The Romans also instituted public games in imitation of the Greeks, -on the degrading 'panis et circenses' principle. In Greece, Apollo -with his nine muses presided over the public games. The Romans had -specially-trained gladiators, wrestlers, dancers, and prize-fighters. -The competitors at the Greek games were free and independent citizens; -with the Romans they were either criminals, runaway slaves, or men -condemned to death. Bears, lions, tigers, and elephants were starved, -and set against one another, to delight the spectators with their -savage brutality. Soon an improvement was effected, and men were -arrayed against men with deadly weapons, to amuse men and women, boys -and girls, with their skill in murdering; and at last, as a further -progressive development in taste, men were pitted against wild beasts. -In the Greek tragedy, the ideal sufferings of humanity, struggling in -an unequal combat with omnipotent and inexorable fate, were prominently -set forth to purify men from their passions by showing the consequences -of even unconscious guilt. The Greek tragedy was the national moral -conscience brought into the most perfect poetical form. The Romans -instituted a cruel reality of _bodily_ suffering; _real_ blood -streaming from _real_ limbs; the _real_ rattle in the throat, which -signals death; and the _real_ last gasp of an expiring man, afforded -them amusement. - -Like their religion and public games, their literature, with -the exception of their satires and law-codes, was matter of -fact and imitative. The generation of the Roman products of -poetry and prose was the following: Homer engendered Virgil, -Hesiod--Lucretius; Pindar--Horace; Aesop--Phaedrus; Euripides--Terence; -Aristophanes--Plautus; Xenophon--Sallust; Thukydides--Titus Livy; -Demosthenes--Cicero. Ovid and Tacitus were the only really original -writers; the first faithfully depicted the hollowness of Roman ethics; -and the other, in unsurpassed language, drew a historical sketch of the -Teutons, mercilessly exposing the contrast between noble simplicity, -grandeur and honesty, and the demoralised state of his own country. - -If art is the outgrowth of the intellectual and moral condition of a -people, what kind of art could the Romans have produced? None. And -this was the case. Roman art is altogether a misnomer; it is in fact -Etruskan, Greek, Assyrian, and Egyptian art, dressed in an eclectic -Roman garb by foreign artists. Art with the Romans was never the -glorious emanation of the poet's sacred ideal of the gods, or the -irresistible civilising power of beauty; it was merely the handmaid -of power, wealth, pomp, and vanity. Art was with them a slave, well -fed, well clad, well housed, well paid, to make power more powerful, -to dazzle the people, to proclaim the universal dominion of Rome over -the world. The Roman character was dry and geometrical, and therefore -in its artistic taste architectural and monumental. Anything that -could serve, by means of technical perfection, to promote art, was -encouraged, adopted, and supported by the Romans. - -We have given a drastic picture of the evils of the Roman spirit; we -must be just to the great mission which it fulfilled unconsciously -and against its will. The centralisation in language, customs, and -manners produced a cosmopolitan spirit. Greek artists and philosophers -spread taste and learning. Distant nations were brought into closer -connection. The roads constructed to facilitate the march of legions, -bent on devastating a province, served as means of communication; so -did their aqueducts and bridges. The wants of an increasing population -forced the Romans to improve agriculture, and commerce was found -necessary. Corn had to be brought from one quarter, textile fabrics -from another; Greece and Egypt were pillaged of their innumerable works -of art, and Rome may be said to have been at that period the greatest -museum of the universe. The superstition and credulity which existed -among the people, by degrees disappeared. Africa had been considered a -land of monsters, with serpents large enough to entangle a whole army -and to crush it; other regions of the accessible world had been thought -inhabited by men without heads. Giants, kyklops, and enchantresses had -been said to perform incredible feats, but were found to be without -supernatural power; the golden apples of Spain turned out to be mere -oranges, and graced the tables of the wealthier, and in time even of -the poorer classes. The mouth of hell had been placed on the shores -of the Euxine (Black Sea), but when those regions were occupied by -Roman soldiers, the mouth of hell had to be removed elsewhere. East -and west, south and north, were united under one great Roman vault, -the four quarters of the globe were over-arched, and the broad cupola -of universalism set over them. Man was made a common slave to one -grand and common abstraction, typically foreshadowing the time when -men would be brought as free agents under one great dome of universal -brotherhood. - -For this grand and really majestic soldering of humanity into one -total, the Romans found the spiritual as well as the material form in - - 1. The arch. - 2. The cross-vault. - 3. The cupola. - -Through the _arch_, which was used by the Etruskans, but which under -the Romans became a most important part of architecture, the art of -constructing was suddenly freed of all hindrances. Courts could be -formed with more ease, and the ground-plan drawn with greater variety. - -The _cross-vault_ may be considered a specially Roman form. Two -cylindrical arches were constructed intersecting each other at right -angles in a quadrangular space. The intersection takes place at the two -diagonal lines, thus uniting the opposite corners. The arches in their -cross-form rise from four points of support, and divide the arch into -four curved triangles, called calottes. - -The _cupola_, a third form of the vault, was called forth in the Romans -by their preference for _circular_ buildings. The ancient mound was -revived by them. It was the application of the arch to a circular -ground-plan. A powerful larger or smaller member of decoration was -produced, interrupting the flatness of walls, and allowing a rich -variety of statuary to be used as ornament. This refers to the use of -the half-cupola for semicircular niches and the apsidae. These merely -geometrical constructions would have been monotonous and without grace, -like our railway stations; and would have been classed as works of -engineering, but never of art; had not the Romans employed Greek forms -in the shape of columns and pilasters, to adorn them. The Doric, Ionic, -Attic, and Korinthian styles were all used, and a so-called composite -or Roman order was added. The composite stood in the same relation to -the proto-Korinthian, as Plautus to Aristophanes. The Romans, with -arrogant clumsiness, placed a coarser and more contracted form of the -Ionic capital on two rows of richly carved acanthus leaves. This was a -bad composition, and left room for much improvement, which was effected -more than fifteen hundred years later. - -Nothing is known of art during the mythical period of Roman history. - -During the first centuries of the Republic, the Etruskan style is said -to have been prevalent, introduced by Tarquin. Square wooden huts with -a rounded and tumulus-like roof of straw, were the first palaces of the -Roman citizens. Only after the conquest of Greece 183 B.C., Grecian -architecture and sculpture were introduced. From this date we may -classify Roman art, under Greek, Assyrian, and Egyptian influences, -into the following periods. - -_a._ The _first_ begins in the second century B.C., under the Republic, -after the destruction of Korinthum by Mummius, and ends with the reign -of the Augustan house, and the beginning of the rule of the Flavians, -69 A.D. This was the _Graeco-Roman Period_ of architecture and sculpture. - -_b._ The _second_ period commences with the _Flavians_, 69 A.D. After -the tyrannical reigns of Tiberius and Nero, the cosmopolitan Imperial -state acquired an apparent stability in new social forms, which found -expression in gigantic artistic constructions. This period, which -lasted down to Septimus Severus, 193 A.D., has three distinct phases. - -a. A phase of powerful development under the Flavians. - -b. A phase of brilliant success under _Trajan_ (98-117 A.D.) - -c. A phase of revival of classic Greek forms under _Hadrian_ -(117-138 A.D.) - -We may designate these phases of development as the _Romano-Greek_ -period. - -_c._ The _third_ period under the military despotism of the praetorian -guards, during which Rome ceased to be the centre of universal -dominion, and each province began to feel its own vitality, lasted -from _Septimus Severus_ (193-211 A.D.) to Constantine the Great. -Art lost every basis--degenerated into luxurious pomp, and became -heavier with each new product, and more fantastic in incredible -details and impossible executions. We may best designate this as the -_Romano-eclectic_ period. - -A. After the destruction of Korinthum, Rome abounded in Greek -immigrants, and in Greek marble and bronze statues, friezes, pillars, -and various movable works of art. The spoils of Greek temples and -houses were set up in Roman houses built of bricks and mortar. The -contrast between the unartistic architecture of the Romans, and the -master-pieces of Greek art, was so striking, that they were forced -to endeavour to improve their architecture, and art became to a -certain degree _fashionable_. The wealthier classes began to study -it _theoretically_, and to affect an immense amount of _patronizing_ -enthusiasm, without any deeper understanding of the laws of taste and -beauty, but with a determination to outdo all other nations in the -profession of works of art. Such sentiments often engender a _brisk -trade_, but they fail to promote real art, or to benefit genuine -artists. The walls of the houses of this period were generally white, -with red painted ornamentations. Red is the favourite colour with -children, savages, and butchers in mind. This led to the making of -red bricks, which were mixed with others of different colours, and -thus originated polylithic wall-decoration. The spaces between the -red bricks were filled in with a black composition in imitation of -different textile patterns, and this mode of decoration was called -Niello. By degrees, bricks and cement were superseded by marble, and -the houses became so rich, that a Puritan party of Roman {idiotais} -formed itself, and thundered against corruption and enervation, luxury -and degradation. The power of this party was so great that Cicero, -fearing lest these stern and dull Roman worthies should think him -acquainted with the principles of artistic refinement, declared his -utter ignorance of art, and expressed his high contempt for all such -futile 'allotria.' - -The art of ornamentation became more and more universal. The fora and -atria were overcrowded with bronze and marble statues and groups. -These efforts, however, were not genuine; they did not grow out of the -artistic wants and love of the people--the whole movement was strange -to their minds--and was altogether a heterogeneous element grafted on -their natures by the force of circumstances. They succeeded by degrees -in ornamenting grandly, but there was always something in contradiction -to, or in conflict with, really good taste. They used patterns meant -for floors on their walls, and wall patterns on their ceilings, and -that which would have fitted a ceiling, they laid on their floors; -creating by this means a sad confusion. Asia always excelling in bright -colours, and in a secret talent for matching them correctly, excited -the admiration of the Romans, and they began to paint their walls. They -often cut out the decorated parts of a pillaged Greek temple, and fixed -these pieces at random in their houses, caring very little whether -there was a congruity between these and their own wall-decoration -or not. We have, during this period, an attempt at 'scenography.' -The walls were painted over with architectural views, representing -colonnades, interiors, landscapes, and later, Greek mythological and -even historical scenes. In these, Perseus and Andromeda, or Medea -meditating the murder of her children, or Herkules destroying the -serpent, or some other _sensational_ deed, formed the cherished -subjects. Under the influence of the Greeks of Alexandria, another -custom became prevalent. The walls were more and more panelled, and the -panels filled with works of art. - -This 'mania,' or fashion, became so universal with the Romans that -they could find no more works of classic art, and had to engage living -artists to reproduce antique cornices, metopes, colonnades, capitals, -shields, helmets, tripods, sphinxes, and griffins; but even these -artists were so overwhelmed with commissions, that it was impossible -for them to satisfy the feverish demand. To produce works of art more -quickly, they began to paint the panels, and the Roman empire became a -complete manufactory of wall-decorations. Light colonnades of slender -reeds, baldachins with pointed arches and fantastic monsters, filled -the walls, and sometimes mere combinations of colours were used in a -conventional style. Art again sank into mere trade. The panels and -walls were not decorated with the works of the good old Greek masters, -but with mere imitations. Mannerism supplanted style, and arabesques, -flourishes, insignificant chequered patterns, or geometrical puzzles, -took the place of historical paintings--poor wall-decorations in a -theatrical style, without any attempt at higher art. - -The use of marble as a means of decoration was not always customary -with the Romans, and was introduced by L. Crassus, the censor, who had -his house decorated with six small columns of marble from Hymettus, -and was very much blamed for this extravagance. M. Scaurus, the aedile, -who built the famous wooden theatre, decorated with 360 pillars of -marble, glass, and bronze, and about 3,000 statues and images, had the -atrium and peristyle of his private house richly adorned with exquisite -columns. Manurra, prefect of the armourers, under Julius Caesar in -Gaul, is set down as the first who had his walls decorated with marble -incrustations; whilst M. Catulus could boast of the first marble -flooring, and of thresholds in Numidian marble. Of temples, one of the -first constructed of marble blocks in a purer Greek style was that of -Jupiter Tonans. The temple of _Fortuna Virilis_ which rose on a lofty -substructure on the banks of the Tiber, was in the Ionic style. The -Vesta temple at Tivoli, enthroned on a steep and rocky height above the -foaming waters of the Anio, was a circular building in the Korinthian -style. - -Theatres, public halls, baths, and Fora were found necessary, either -to distract the public mind from political matters, or to gain the -suffrages of the fickle mob, eager for amusement and excitement. The -first theatre in stone was erected by Pompey. Julius Caesar surpassed -all his predecessors and rivals in magnificence. He began the theatre -of Marcellus, which was completed by Augustus, and so enlarged and -beautified the _Circus Maximus_ that it could accommodate 150,000 -spectators; he built the beautiful Basilica Julia, a public law-court -for the Centumviri or Judges to sit in, and hear causes, and for the -counsellors to receive their clients, and had a new Forum constructed, -and adorned it with a temple dedicated to Venus Genetrix. The Roman -Forum (in imitation of the Greek Agora) was a building about three -times as long as broad. The interior was surrounded by arched porticos, -and flanked by the most stately edifices, such as theatres, basilicae, -and temples. - -These Fora were devoted to special purposes, as Fora _civilia_ or Fora -_venalia_, and were used for public meetings, or as market-places. -Caesar tried to become a Roman Perikles, but was distanced in this by -the Emperor Augustus. Up to the establishment of Caesarism, Rome had -been literally a city of 'bricks;' now it became a 'city of marble.' -Temples were profusely built and rebuilt. The Caesarian theocracy -required these abodes of splendour and self-glorification. One of the -most imposing specimens of this _Graeco-Roman_ architecture was the -Pantheon, built by Agrippa, the son-in-law of Augustus. Originally -it was to have been an entrance-hall to splendid Thermae, but on its -completion it was turned into a temple, and dedicated to the avenging -Jupiter. It was a circular building 132 feet in diameter, and 132 -feet high, and triumphantly proclaimed Rome's wealth and might. It -contained a statue of Minerva by Pheidias, and a Venus, who it is said -had in her ear the half of the pearl left by Cleopatra. The pearl was -valued at 125,000_l._ That a Greek marble statue should have been -ornamented with part of the _ear-ring_ of an Egyptian princess, is -highly characteristic of Roman taste in matters of art. One of the most -splendid remains in the style of good Greek Korinthian ornamentation -is the temple of Augustus at Pola in Istria. Triumphal gates, these -Roman specialities, were at this period simple in design, and perfect -in execution. Of the Mausoleum of Augustus nothing is left but the -substructure, 220 feet in diameter, now used as a circus for equestrian -performances. 'Sic transit gloria mundi,' if based on mere ostentation -and vain pride. - -During this period Nikopolis was planned and built; the Temple of -Solomon was adorned with colonnades in the Greek Korinthian style, -and at Nimes (Nemausus) we possess the most complete remains of a -prostylos pseudipteros temple of Roman architecture, with the purest -Korinthian columns. Under Tiberius the camp of the praetorians was -turned into a marble palace. Under Claudius harbours and moles were -enlarged, built, and decorated. Nero burned Rome, to reconstruct -it with greater pomp. The architects Celerus and Severus had to -build the _golden houses_, of which the porticos were miles long. -The dining-rooms surpassed in splendour anything dreamt of in Indian -poetry. In the decoration of this palace, or rather cluster of palaces, -we trace the greatest mistake an artist can be guilty of. The error -is of Asiatic origin. It may be designated as a conscious '_lying_' -in the constructive elements. They tried to hide the costly material -under a cheap disguise; a tendency as bad and objectionable, as a -'lying' in cheap substances to represent costly materials. The Romans -used tortoise-shell as veneer for their furniture, and painted it to -make it appear like wood; we, on the other hand, use wood, and paint it -over to make it appear 'giallo antico,' (yellow marble), or any other -costly stone. Ornamentation began to lose all symmetry and proportion. -Confusion and profusion ruled supreme. The walls of the rooms looked -like exhibitions of oriental carpets, tapestry, and jewelry. Art -retrograded to the over-painted, over-decorated, over-ornamented -shrouds, in which the mummies of old were buried. For a time art was -carried with Asiatic splendour to a grave of tasteless pomposity. - -B. With the Flavians, down to Septimus Severus, a new spirit of -artistic universalism pervaded the Roman world. The Greek element -waned, and the circular forms of the Romans, ornamented with an -indiscriminate mixture of Doric, Ionic, and Korinthian columns, -predominated. The Colosseum, a Flavian amphitheatre, begun by Vespasian -and finished by Titus, belongs to this period. Three rows of arcades, -the first of Doric, the second of Ionic, and the third of Korinthian -half-columns, with their entablatures, crowned with a fourth story, -adorned with Korinthian pilasters, and furnished with windows, -encompassed an oval, 600 feet long by 500 feet broad, capable of -holding 80,000 spectators. The circus was so constructed that it could -also be used as a naumachy. In this over-decorated pompous building, -the great fights of the gladiators took place; here men and wild beasts -met in deadly struggle; here men, if killed, were dragged away by ropes -fixed in their bodies with iron hooks; here the Imperators sat with all -the nobility of Rome, and delighted in sports, which, at a later period -of Rome's spiritual dominion, were only surpassed in _cruelty_ by the -pious 'auto-da-fes' of misguided priests. - -The triumphal arch of Titus, on the heights of the Via Sacra; with -one arch broken through the massive walls, ornamented on each side by -half-columns; was the first to be decorated with the coarser form of -the Roman _composite capital_. The ornamentation keeps within certain -limits; the inner side walls of the arch have excellent reliefs, -referring to the destruction of Jerusalem. - -Everything yet enumerated was surpassed in splendour and magnificence -by the 'Forum Trajanum' (A.D. 98-117), of which Apollodorus, born -at Damaskus, was the architect. The great basilica Ulpia, with its -_five aisles_, formed part of it. In a small courtyard, surrounded by -pillars, rose the gigantic column of Trajan to a height of 92 feet. -The reliefs, which in spiral windings surround the richly ornamented -column, are a kind of Imperial record, chronicling with historical -accuracy and dryness, scene after scene of the Dacian war. The -figures are two feet high and not less than 2,500 in number; they are -sculptured in a simple naturalistic style, void of all idealisation, -and show the artist's talent for grouping. The heads of the figures, as -was generally the case in all sculptures by the Romans, are too small -for the bodies. - -The triumphal arch of Constantine, with three openings, is undoubtedly -the most splendid monument of its kind. It was of Pentelic marble, -taken from the fragments of an arch in honour of Trajan. The -proportions are noble, and the execution is technically precise; -the ornamentation, however, is too profuse. The second phase of -this period degenerated very quickly. Cornices began to be fluted; -triglyphs and indentations were used alternately in endless rows; even -the central volutes of the Corinthian capitals (the caulicoli) were -over-decorated. Everything ran wild; rosettes, cassettes, shields, -consols, stereobates, and stylobates were used abundantly, without -sense and reason, to heighten the effect of the horizontal lines of -the buildings. Everything was out of shape, out of proportion, and out -of place. An eternal repetition of the same forms proclaimed the same -desperate _deification_ of the omnipotent power of the theocratic ruler. - -Hadrian, the emperor, whose position constituted him a _divine_ -architect, and who by his very dignity must have known art better than -any other mortal, did not share, with many a self-conceited artist of -our time, the idea that the 'work and labour done' was all that was -required in art, and that any knowledge of correct principles, any -feeling of beauty, any acquaintance with esthetics or with art-history, -was useless, and that money and power of execution were the only things -required. On the contrary, though Emperor of the Romans, he diligently -studied the antique, and tried to revive classic art. - -We had an _imperial architect_, with an unlimited amount of gold, -silver, marble, wood, and precious material at his command, and yet he -had to go back to the Greeks for elegant forms in ornamentation. He -had Apollodorus executed for daring to find fault with the confused -plan of the temple of Venus (_Amor_) _and Roma_, which was a building -surpassing, so far as splendour went, any construction of those times. -The double temple had certainly something whimsical in its plan. The -Emperor was too forcibly struck by the discovery that _Roma_ read -backwards gave _Amor_, and wanted to express this discovery in an -architectural allegory, placing _two_ temples back to back so that -they made _one_, to typify _two_ words with _two_ meanings, that yet -were _one_ word. The success, so far as correctness of plan went, was -doubtful. The cassettes of the bronze roof which united the _two_ -temples into _one_, were most elegantly finished. The court of the -temple was 500 feet by 300. Another tower-like circular monument, -based on a square sub-structure, formed the Mausoleum (now the Castle -of St. Angelo). The diameter of the circular part was 226 feet. The -construction vies in solidity and grandeur with the Egyptian monuments. -The blocks of travertin are colossal, and the immense building was -covered with Parian marble, and crowned with a huge quadriga. - -Under the Antonines architecture, and art in general, gradually -declined. The people occupied themselves with entirely different -topics. Stoicism and Christianity--the old world of heathen formality, -and the new world of spiritual redemption--were placed in conflict. -A disturbed state of the public mind rarely favours plastic art. -A specimen exhibiting this conflict may be seen in the temple of -Antoninus and Faustina, built by Antoninus Pius (A.D. 138-161). A -second edition of Trajan's column is given in that of Marcus Aurelius -(A.D. 161-180), which stands on the field of Mars. The reliefs, winding -round the shaft, represent scenes from the war against the Markomanni. -There is a certain liveliness in the execution, but the composition -is wanting in clearness and precision, and above all in idealisation. -Rivers, fields, and enclosures of walls, are marked with great -accuracy; and the reliefs take, in style, the forms of geographical -maps. Strict realism is the leading feature in this monument. - -C. During the third period architecture and sculpture, ornamentation -and painting, had soon to yield to a continual use of arms. The proud -mistress of the world no more expanded her sway; she was once more -busy in decorating her rich palaces, but in care and sorrow, and -with an anxious brow, haunted by the necessity for exerting all her -powers to keep what she possessed. The provinces had learnt to do -without Rome; the consuls and pro-consuls had so well imitated their -_divine_ masters, that they thought themselves gods, and the supreme -deity, the Imperator, lost his power over them. The State--based on -an abstraction--began to vanish like a midnight phantom at daybreak. -The one-sided deification of matter, during the old heathen times, had -to yield to a totally new mode of feeling, thinking, speaking, and -acting. The new times were seeking new forms, and had to pass from a -savage state, through that of barbarism, symbolism, and mysticism, -into self-consciousness, in order to find such shapes as would express -a perfect harmony between spirit and matter. In the meantime, art -dragged on its existence in copying what the old masters of Greece -and the artists of Rome had done. The chisel, ruler, nay the very -stones, trembled in the hands of the artists. They felt that they -worked without a basis; that they heaped up blocks to see them soon -crumble into the dust; that they constructed streets of pompous -columns, some of them 3,500 feet long, to see them empty and deserted; -they ornamented, but did it with a heavy heart; their soul was no -more in the work. They heard already the deep _spiritual_ whisper -of other tidings resounding through the world on one side, and the -terrible _temporal_ shout of powerful barbarians, not yet enervated by -luxury and licentiousness, armed with swords and iron clubs, on the -other. The footsteps of avenging phantoms were heard in the North; -the 'hallelujahs' of redeemed humanity in the South. This period is -ushered in with the triumphal arch of Severus, on which the reliefs are -placed without any regard to the architectural arrangement. Caracalla -(A.D. 211-217) had baths constructed, with gigantic halls, furnished -with 1,600 marble seats, with shady promenades, pompous reading-rooms, -and places for games of every variety. This was to be a paradise on -earth, to detach men from that _spiritual_ Eden of love and happiness, -the gates of which were opened by Christ. In feverish excitement, -streets, palaces, basilicae, halls, market-places, monuments, and whole -towns, were built by the heathens. The pomp of worship was increased. -Diocletian constructed baths with 2,400 seats; the principal hall -was under three cross-vaults, with a span of 80 feet each, resting on -granite columns. Sensationalism seized upon both people and artists; -a sensationalism tinged with Roman vulgarity. All the principles of -architecture, sculpture, and ornamentation were neglected. Columns and -arches were mixed together in doleful incongruity. The arch rested -on the architrave, or often rose without interruption directly from -the capital. Columns were made in spiral or screw form; the variety -of details was oppressive; no rest, no caesura distinguished their -ornamentation. It was, in fact, _an ornamentation over-ornamented_. The -technical execution was everywhere splendid, but utterly mechanical; -principles were neglected in art, because Roman life had lost even the -one guiding principle of its existence--expansion by brutal force. The -vulgar in mind and taste will always be charmed by huge and imposing -masses, by the richness of the material, the daring of geometrical -combination, and by startling feats of mechanical contrivance. The -gorgeous mouldings, the friezes of endless decorations, the capitals -with their rich foliage, marshalled in precise architectural lines, -like Roman legions placed in battle array, have a peculiarly mystic -charm for all those, who care more for effect than for taste or -severity of style, or more for show than for symmetry and proportion; -but if they love the old Roman style, and wish to work in it, let -them above all insist on genuine materials. Let them work in real -granite, travertin, and marble; let them not work in iron and glass, -or in plaster of Paris, instead of Carrara marble; or in wood painted -and varnished to represent granite, _lapis lazuli_ (azure-stone), or -_giallo antico_. An artist's first duty is to know and master his -material, and not to try and bring about Roman architectural effects -with substances that require an altogether different treatment. -Whenever we endeavour to shirk this law, we are sure to produce -something small and mean, thin and wasted, notwithstanding gorgeous -dimensions. Whilst trying to look grand and haughty, substantial and -pompous, we tell 'falsehoods' in bricks and mortar, in painted friezes, -sham columns, and meretricious porticos; and we are then astonished -that our artistic product, instead of being admired, is laughed at as a -caricature. - -In Greece the dynamic force was concentrated on the reproduction of -_ideal beauty_; in Rome it was exhausted in conquests and politics. -Only so long as the moral force of beauty--equivalent to that of -virtue--counterbalanced the eccentricities of a wild fantastic -imagination, the Greeks were capable of producing models of art. The -Romans never cultivated this balance; they disciplined themselves, -but in a totally different direction. This technical, mechanical, and -military discipline is, at a certain period of an individual's or a -nation's life, highly necessary, in order to place the bodily and -intellectual capacities under the guidance of some authority, although -this may be a mere abstraction. The results which may thus be attained, -can be studied in Roman art, in spite of all its shortcomings. - -CHRISTIANITY now illuminated the world with its clear light; but, -dazzled by the divine brilliancy, everything in art, science and social -life appeared at first dark, black, and hopeless. By degrees the minds -of men began to grasp the newly proclaimed eternal law, through which -alone the disturbed inner and outer, spiritual and material, moral and -intellectual, static and dynamic forces of humanity were to attain -a perfect balance. In time man became conscious of his nature, and -emancipated his spirit in life and in art. He began to strive upwards, -to detach himself from mere forms, however beautiful, if there was -no meaning, no soul, no sense in them; he sought in everything the -redeeming IDEA, without which no _modern_ work of art is possible. -Thus, ancient art had to yield to different principles. We shall have -in future to distinguish between artistic products of _reality_, -_feeling_, and _intellect_, till we shall find ourselves obliged to -seek for a combination of these elements in order to understand modern -art. - - - - -CHAPTER XI. - -EARLY CHRISTIAN ART. - - -Historically and philosophically, from the point of view of whatever -religious denomination; in the eyes of the devout believer, as well as -in the eyes of the sceptic; by the thinker, and by the mere automaton -of blood, flesh and bones; it must be admitted, that the two most -important events in the history of humanity were the foundation of -Christianity, and the great migration of the Northern people. The one -was a _spiritual_ movement, the other thoroughly _material_. - -It is usual, in tracing the historical development of mankind in -science and art, to follow the apparent course of the sun, and to -assume that progress travelled with Indra, Ormuzd, Horus and Phoibos -Apollo, from East to West. This is, however, a mere phrase. To -understand and appreciate the history of man, it is better to divide -the globe into a southern and northern hemisphere; for we find, that in -analogy with this subdivision, the material as well as the intellectual -development of life on our globe took place. We may even go further, -and trace a distinction between the development of life and art in -the south and north of the northern and southern hemispheres. In the -farthest south of the southern hemisphere we have animal life and -man, in the very lowest scale of progressive development; whilst the -further we travel towards the north, the more animal life and the -intellectual capacity of man increase. This is also the case in the -northern hemisphere, up to the frigid zone, where a reaction sets in. -In the south the moral power was more developed than the intellectual. -In the south the predominant static force, joined to an ill-disciplined -imagination, drove man to the field of metaphysical speculation; the -misunderstood laws of nature, and the ignorance of the sluggish and -indolent masses, gave free play to superstition and priestcraft. Thus -the south (or south-east) was the birth-place of various theogonies, -and religious systems. Idolatry, zoolatry, Sabaism, theism, pantheism, -astrology, symbolism, mysticism, alchemy, magic, and cabalism -originated in the south. The intellectual power in humanity, with a -strong tendency to regulate itself by moral force, decidedly prevailed -in the north, or north-west of our globe; and we received philosophy, -as well as art, in their highest perfection, from Greece, the then -most northern dwelling-place of civilized humanity. All the sciences -which, through their beneficial influence have promoted the welfare -and progress of humanity, were fostered in the North. In the North, -astronomy, geography, history, botany, zoology, physiology, anatomy, -chemistry, geology, and cosmogony were developed. - -The savage of the South, up to our days, does not go beyond an -ornamentation with geometrical figures; he can neither produce -animals nor the human figure. The Egyptians surpassed the Assyrians -and Babylonians in their monumental architecture, but in the plastic -reproduction of the human form they never succeeded. Their sitting -figures had legs and thighs forming right angles in the side view, -while in front they were parallel; the drapery was merely marked by -lines, rarely interrupted by folds. In their historical and allegorical -bas-reliefs the composition is devoid of elegance and correctness -of outlines; but they already showed a remarkable power in drawing -animals. The Indians reached a higher stage of progress in sculpture; -their mythology and poetry furnished them with a variety of subjects, -with which they covered the walls of their shrines and temples; after -the doctrines of Buddha became more universal, they attained grandeur -in their architecture, combined with a certain degree of elegance. The -human form is reproduced with ease; the proportions, though too soft, -too sensual, are more correct than with the Egyptians. - -So long as the Greek artists worked with reverence and modesty, -inspired by faith in the gods, they were capable of understanding -God's revelation of beauty in man's outer form. So long as the Romans -unconsciously worked in this spirit, they produced their stupendous -architectural monuments. When, however, State and citizens were forced -by false principles to war with reality for a beggarly existence, or -to plunge into mere sensuous enjoyments, man came to an open rupture -with his destiny, and humanity might have perished altogether in sin -and iniquity, had not Providence mercifully interfered by freeing, -through Christ, the 'inner man'--that is, the intellectual and moral -force in man--thus preparing humanity for a higher progressive life. -The south of Asia had to go through the same religious and artistic -phases of development. Buddhism stands to Brahmanism in the same -relation as Christianity to Mosaism and Heathenism. Excepting, however, -that both religions were reformations of older established creeds, -all analogy between them ceases. The proof of the difference lies -in the diametrically opposed development produced by Buddhism and -Christianity. It is true that Buddhism teaches us not to kill, not -to steal, not to lie, and not to be drunken. Christianity does the -same. Buddha, in twelve other ordinances, extols self-abnegation, -poverty, and commands all to meditate amongst the tombs on the fleeting -transitoriness of our earthly existence. Christianity does the same. -Christ, however, redeemed and freed our spiritual nature, and brought -it into a self-conscious, vivid activity; whilst Buddhism degraded this -higher _individual_ nature into a nonentity, denying that there was an -independent moral agent in us; teaching that we were phenomena of an -all-pervading divine power, by which universality we should be absorbed -after life. So long as Christianity held, though in a different shape, -nearly the same mystic principles as Buddhism, the results in art -were the same; for our ecclesiastical art was a revival of Buddhistic -temples, with all their divisions and sub-divisions, their pointed -arches, their variegated columns and pillars, the triforium, the altar -(Daghopa), cloisters, chapels, and crypts. - -Christ's divine words resounded at a period when the Greeks had long -turned their minds to the licentious worship of the sensuous. The -Egyptians, sighing under their Roman taskmasters, had taken refuge -in dark mysticism, the meaning of which had been long lost to them; -the Jews were divided into quarrelling sects, sunken in religious -indifference, or occupied with mere outward formalities, hating -everyone and hated by everyone. The Romans knelt tremblingly before -an imperial divinity, slaves and poor being considered mere burdens -on society; the rich were merciless, debauched, and revelled in -amusements; infanticides, suicides, murder and decay, despair and -annihilation, were every-day occurrences. At this period, under such -circumstances, the divine Master died on the cross, sealing with his -death the one great tiding of love: 'that we are all children of _one_ -Father, who is in heaven.' The god of revenge of the old world was -transformed into a God of inexhaustible love. With the Jews and the -ancients, he only was blessed who had plenty on earth; now, the pure -in mind, whether poor or rich, weak or mighty, beautiful or ugly, was -extolled. God was not merely present in the universe as its living -soul, or in a burning bush, in thunder and lightning, in growling -volcanoes, in an ark, a carved idol, a statue or in a temple. God -was present, wherever a kind, loving, and forgiving mind was ready -to be His ark or temple. Christ repudiated all local gods; did not -require any sacrifices of plants or animals; did not prescribe any -diet, or outward sanguinary sign; did not allow polygamy; did not -proclaim his followers the only _chosen_ children of the _Father of -All_; but taught the one and indivisible, and ever-true law of peace, -love, and tolerance. This doctrine is as universal as intellect; it -must be of as divine origin as intellect itself; it is, and can be, -the only faith which must once unite Humanity into one great loving -and beloved brotherhood. What a change! Not only a change; it was the -building up of a new glorious future; it was the re-establishment of -the lost balance between the working forces of humanity; it was the -redemption of our individual, moral, and intellectual capacities; it -was the enunciation of an eternal law, under which humanity had, till -then, unconsciously developed, but of which it became conscious in word -as well as in spirit, through Christ. Slavery in body or mind was, -at least in principle, for ever abolished; and one of the noblest -edifices of Byzantine architecture in Italy, the church of St. Vitale -at Ravenna, was dedicated by Justinian, a Roman Emperor, to the memory -of a slave, who was martyred for the sake of his piety and love. -Hospitals for the poor and sick, Xenodochia (refuges for strangers) -began to be built--architectural constructions of which the whole -ancient world could not boast. - -The Christian spirit at first struggled to find a corresponding form -in art; the new wine was put into the old vessels till it burst the -decaying fetters and issued forth in a life-giving art-stream, in two -directions:-- - -(_a_) As Romanesque art in the West, a decaying continuation of Roman -art; - -(_b_) As Byzantine art in the East, a revival of Asiatic art. - -The beginning of Christian plastic and pictorial art is to be looked -for in subterranean caves; in catacombs, used by Egyptians, Assyrians, -Persians, Greeks, Etruskans, and Romans as burial-places. The deep but -simple doctrines of Christ were at first hidden in symbols, types, -allegories and emblems. In a SYMBOL we try to express a general idea by -a special outward sign, totally heterogeneous in form to the meaning. -Geometrical figures, plants, and animals, furnish the elements of -symbolism. In the ALLEGORY the artist represents congruities, traces -connections, unites analogies and separates differences. Imagination -has in allegories an inexhaustible field for composition. TYPES are -signs, arbitrarily interpreted as meaning something, which they may or -may not mean. EMBLEMS with the Greeks were golden or silver figures -which could be detached from vessels. With the Romans the word was used -as a synonym for symbol or metaphor. They became with us Christians -signs in colours. White or blue was the emblem of innocence, red of -joy, black of mourning, green of hope, and purple of power or dignity. - -MYTHS generally had their origin in symbols and allegories, which found -interpreters, commentators, exegists, and expounders in the priests of -the ancient world. Later, the myths were taken up by poets and artists, -and the dogmatic explanations of mystic signs were transformed into -legends, tales, sagas, or even into historical facts. Nothing affords -greater delight to the inquisitive mind of man than a mystic sign! -The more unintelligible such a sign is, the more welcome it is to the -childish creature. Anything veiled in doubt, shrouded in a symbol or -type, has a peculiar charm. Anything that can only be guessed at, or -dimly felt, is more admired than that which lies clearly before our -perceptive faculty. 'Mysteries were taught in symbols, in darkness -at night-time; the symbolic itself is to be compared to night and -darkness,' says Demetrius. No wonder that symbols were adopted by the -first followers of Christ. They were too near to Egypt; the ancient -world had not yet altogether lost its hold on the minds of the masses, -and they could not have avoided availing themselves of forms which were -used by Indians, Greeks, Egyptians, or Romans. - -In the old catacombs of St. Sebastiano, St. Calisto, St. Lorenzo, and -Sta. Agnese at Rome, extending altogether to about 750 miles, and in -those of St. Gennaro de Poveri, Sta. Maria della Sanita, and Sta. Maria -della Vita at Naples, we find some attempts at symbolism; the cross, -the monogram of Christ's name {CHR}; or an {AO}, symbolical of the -beginning and the end of all things; a palm branch, doves, the piscis -vesica, and here and there a lamb. But these signs belong to the fourth -and fifth centuries A.D. The inscriptions do not go farther back than -the second century. The homely simplicity of the early Christians is -distinctly to be traced in the absence of all symbolic decoration -during the first two centuries. Gradually the Christians passed through -the phase of geometrical ornamentation. Triangles and circles, crosses -and squares, squares divided into four squares, or the square taken -three times, giving twelve points, which number contains the sacred -numbers; three (the Trinity), five (the five sacred wounds of Christ), -seven (the seven cardinal virtues, or the seven days of Creation), -and twelve (the twelve apostles), made their appearance. Seven was a -holy and mystic number with all the ancient nations. There were seven -planets, and seven colours in olden times; Apollo's lyre had seven -strings; Pan used seven pipes for his flute. There are seven days of -the week; seven or three times seven are the critical days in medicine; -there were seven branches to the candlestick of the Jews in the Temple -of Jerusalem. Seven years Jacob had to serve for Leah; and seven others -for Rachel; seven were the ears and kine of which Pharaoh dreamt; seven -were the gods in Scandinavian mythology; seven were the sufferings of -the Virgin Mary; seven the cardinal virtues; seven the deadly sins; -seven are the sacraments of the Romish Church. We cannot fail to see -in the minutest details of history and art, philosophy and religious -systems, an eternally progressing 'one-ness' pervading humanity as a -great whole. - -Scarcely had the Christians adopted these signs, when they passed on to -the next phase, adorning churches and tombs, altars and sacred vessels, -with emblems taken from the vegetable and animal kingdoms, to serve as -the holy visible outward signs of some sacred inward grace or virtue. -What was immortal was to be expressed in mortal forms, and the finite -was to embody the infinite. Again, the meaning hallowed the form; -again, by degrees, the _form_ became all, and the spirit was altogether -lost through the mere outward sign. Art suffered for centuries under -the gloomy pressure of symbolism, and in striving to disentangle -itself, produced marvels, but it was only freed and attained higher -forms of beauty again, when humanity had gone back to those laws, which -when followed out had produced forms perfect in themselves. - -For centuries art revelled in the reproduction of symbolical crows, -eagles, peacocks, doves, gridirons, pitchers, beehives, oxen, -pigs, bulls, geese, violins, fishes, &c., as the attributes of St. -Sebastian, St. John, Sta. Barbara, St. Thomas of Aquin, St. Cyprian, -St. Narcissus, St. Bernard, St. Sebaldus, St. Anthony, St. Martin, -St. Genesius, St. Chrysogonus, &c. A whole science arose out of these -symbols and emblems: _Iconology_, which differs only in form from -mythology. The mere phenomena of nature were no longer embodied; the -individual spirit that lived in the form, became all in all. We were -thus introduced to a two-fold world by Christian art. - -(1) Into a spiritual world, in which our intellect moved, as it were, -in a circle. We took our beginning in the infinite, lost our transitory -bodily form, and returned to the infinite from which we emanated--a -kind of idealisation of the corporeal. - -(2) A world of external forms, which in their individual phenomena had -only a meaning as the fragile temporary vessels of the eternal Spirit; -this Spirit was no longer a universal sum total by which the individual -was hereafter absorbed, but was assumed to remain _individualised_ -through all eternity. Artists and men worked not only for this world, -but their deeds were to outlast all time to come. In this two-fold -world, Christian art went through the following phases:-- - -(_a_) Through a _historical_ phase, which commenced with Christ's -birth, life, death, and resurrection, as the new central point of all -things. The eternal Spirit was embodied, worked in a finite form, and -freed from it, regained its absolute divinity. This led in time to -sublime historical sketches in sculpture and painting. - -(_b_) Through a _religious_ phase. The spirit, freed and redeemed by -Christ, sought in deeds of harmonious love totally new spheres of -action. Crystals, flowers, trees, landscapes, animals and men, were -interwoven to proclaim not only outward beauty, as with the Greeks, -but a union of the inorganic and the organic, the ancient and the new -worlds, in honour of one God in three emanations or personifications. - -So long as bishops, priests, elders, deacons and laymen, were occupied -in trying to shape the new spirit into words, art appeared to slumber. -A too strong storm-wind of dissension on metaphysical niceties, of -mystic and dogmatic hair-splittings, hindered a plastic treatment of -Christianity. Gnostics, Nestorians, Manichaeans, Donatists, Arians, and -Athanasians, &c., wasted the energies of the early Christian artists, -with their wild distinctions, their incomprehensible differences. -Quarrels as to whether a blessing was more efficacious when bestowed -with _three_ or only with _two_ uplifted fingers; whether crosses of -equal parts, or crosses in which one division was smaller than the -other, were more powerful, did not promote the productive ability of -artists. When, under Constantine, Christianity was elevated to the rank -of a State religion, churches were built in honour of the new faith. -In the West the Roman Basilicae were given up to the religious worship -of the Christians, and in time, mixed with Teuton forms, produced the -Romanesque style. In the East a lively revival of Asiatic forms, of -Indian, Assyrian, and Babylonian patterns, took place, and from these -combinations we have the so-called Byzantine style. - -The general characteristics of the early Christian style, in which -the form of the Roman basilica predominated, were the following:--The -apsis, the seat of the bishop and clergy, was semicircular. Between -the apsis and the nave stood the altar, or rather the common table, -canopied by a baldachin supported by columns. The walls were covered -with figures of Christ. The main body consisted of a broad and lofty -central nave, on the two sides of which there were two lower passages, -divided by rows of columns, supporting the upper wall of the nave -either by a common architrave, or by strong circular arches. The upper -wall was provided with large broad windows, some being also placed -in the low walls of the side-aisles. The apsis was kept in mystic -darkness. - -The threefold division of the Indian, Egyptian, and Hebrew temples was -carefully kept up. The priests assembled in the apsis; the worshippers -in the hall or the galleries; and the penitents or sinners stopped at -the entrance. Of this period, we have the Basilica of Reparatus, in -Tingitanum (now Orleansville) in Algeria, and another in El Hayz, on -a small oasis, in the Libyan desert. In the former the pillars were -probably square, and the apsis is not marked outside. The latter is -furnished with vaulted aisles, adorned with pilasters and niches in the -Romano-Egyptian style. - -Under Constantine, Christian churches of larger dimensions were -constructed; marble decorations and a profusion of columns were common. -The five aisles still predominated, the Athanasians not having yet -succeeded in establishing the Trinitarian doctrine. St. Peter's at Rome -(rebuilt in the 16th century); Sta. Croce at Jerusalem, and the Church -of Sta. Maria at Bethlehem, built by Helena, the wife of Constantine, -were splendid specimens of the pure early Christian style. The transept -before the raised apsis was an innovation. The central aisle (the nave) -rises in independent loftiness. The galleries are dispensed with, as -the dimensions of the building are considerably increased. Light is -admitted through windows in the lofty central aisle. The lines all -tend towards the altar, and the high tribune. The nave is separated -from the transept by a lofty arch supported by pillars. The transept -is provided with broad windows, throwing the greatest amount of light -on the altar, by which means a sublime effect is attained. St. Peter's -at Rome, and Sta. Maria at Bethlehem, are provided with cross-beams, -which do not accord with the superstructure, which is too heavy. Before -these churches, in a court-yard, stood the fountain. These fountains -were common to all the Indian, Egyptian, and Hebrew temples, because -the _sanctity of water_ was recognised by all the religious sects of -the Southeast. _San Paolo fuori le mura_ belonged to this class of -churches. It was constructed by Theodosius and Honorius. 'The mighty -apsis, about eighty feet in breadth, is increased in effect by a lofty -transept, which stretches in front of it, across the whole nave. The -body of the church has five aisles. Eighty granite columns, connected -by circular arches, rise in four rows in order to divide the aisles, -and to support the upper wall of the central aisle, and the framework -of the roof. The main aisle opens into the transept with a broad and -lofty triumphal arch, which rests on two colossal columns. A splendid -atrium, surrounded with colonnades, was added to the front, completing -the plan of this basilica.' The high walls above the central isle -fulfilled a double purpose: they vividly expressed an expanding -tendency upwards, and filled the soul with the idea of the infinite. -This tendency was still more strongly expressed in ecclesiastical or -Gothic architecture. Scenes from the life of Christ and his disciples -were painted, and, in imitation of Roman decoration, gilded panels and -marble pavings were freely used. After the fourth century the five -aisles were gradually abandoned, and only three were used, symbolic -of the Trinity. We have here a kind of Indian or rather Buddhistic -renaissance. - -When Ravenna became the seat of the Byzantine Exarchs (viceroys), the -Ostrogoth influences which were perceptible under Theodoric vanished, -and a freer organisation of the sacred edifices was introduced by the -addition of an independent bell-tower, reminding us of the Buddhistic -towers or pillars, the Irish round towers, the minarets of the -Mahomedans, and the obelisks of the Egyptians. The tower rose in a -cylindrical form, without tapering. The roofs of the churches were -generally flat. Strong wall pillars, connected by _circular_ arches, -framed the windows as a repetition of the arcades below. The capitals -retained a double row of acanthus leaves, but the imposts became -stronger, taking the form of a coffin or a small altar, adorned with -crosses, or the monogram of Christ. The churches of St. Vitale and -St. Apollinare in Classe, are models of this transition style, which -formed the link between the Romanesque and the Byzantine. In these we -find Greek marble columns, profuse mosaics on gold grounds, panels and -medallions filled with historical scenes, or the portraits of bishops, -prophets, saints, and martyrs; the decoration is heavy in outlines, -the forms and figures too naturalistic; the taste gorgeous without -refinement; and the technical treatment rough and defective. - -Whilst the architectural and ornamental styles were receiving fixed -forms as the pure Romanesque of the West--through the influence of -the Teutons, who became masters of Italy and worked with greater -stiffness, simplicity, and angularity--Byzantine architecture assumed, -from the time of Justinian, a peculiarly pompous, Asiatic type. The -dome prevailed; the ground-plan was composed of squares and circles. -Ceremonies and mysteries borrowed from the Egyptians, Persians, and -Romans, and the division of priests into different castes, required -a different arrangement of the building. There was a place for the -high and one for the low clergy; another for the laymen; the galleries -were, in the old Jewish fashion, assigned to the women; and, lastly, -there was a place for the penitent. These divisions and subdivisions -induced confusion and disunion in the whole plan. Many of the Christian -buildings have become, in their turn, Mahomedan mosques, just as the -Roman basilicae of old were turned into Christian churches. - -The mightiest and the most gigantic of all Byzantine churches is -undoubtedly that of St. Sophia, at Constantinople. First the building -was a temple dedicated to 'Holy Wisdom,' in the ancient or classic -meaning of the word. The edifice was destroyed by fire, and rebuilt -by Justinian in five years (A.D. 532-537). Twenty years later it was -much damaged by an earthquake. The injured dome was removed, raised -somewhat higher upon strengthened counterfoils, and finished A.D. 563. -The architects were Anthemis of Tralles, and Isidorus of Miletus. The -ground-plan, ornamentation, and construction, aim in combination at -one single result--surprise. There is a contradiction between lengths -and circles, destroying all effect of simple perspective. The various -cupolas, arches, and half-cupolas, connected with great technical -skill, have no organically united life. An antediluvian world opens its -gates to us. There is everywhere something astounding and gorgeous, -but we are unable to discern the necessity for the existence of the -parts, to form a coherent total. The galleries with their colonnades -puzzle us. The outer square-form, overtowered by a mighty cupola, -and by half-cupolas, is as incongruous as the ornamentation of the -interior. The shafts of the columns are amongst the finest specimens -of Roman architecture. Walls and pillars are adorned with variegated -marble panels in mosaic patterns. The roofs of the dome and semi-domes -are covered with gold mosaics, set in coloured ornamented frames, -interspersed with figurative tapestry-like representations. Christ, -saints, and prophets, are suspended in golden clouds. The effect on an -untutored mind is perfectly intoxicating. Though we do not underrate -the fully developed system of stone-roof construction, we must draw -the attention of our readers to the heavy and shapeless capitals with -the scarcely recognisable Ionic volutes, combined with Corinthian -leaf-work; all outlines being smothered by over-ornamentation, -destroying the beautiful effect of the antique by a clumsy impost. -Byzantine architecture remained stationary for hundreds of years. The -religious spirit went hand in hand with their stiff, lifeless art. -Ignorance and credulity engendered in the East a boundless intolerance -of all divergence of opinion, to which was added an equally boundless -toleration of falsehoods and frauds, so soon as these means served -to support the received opinions. An intellectual standstill was the -result of these principles, and acted on art, rendering it in general -as well as in detail an unwieldy mixture of Egyptian, Assyrian, Greek, -and Roman forms, overloaded with Asiatic filigree composed of lines -drawn from Christian symbolism. The Byzantine style of ornamentation -will always be, like that of China, a strange element to us. However -much the ingenuity of the winding, coiling, and recoiling lines, -interspersed with small and large jewels, may interest us, though we -may gaze at the profusion of gold mixed with gaudy colours with a kind -of vague bewilderment, Byzantine art can never appeal to our sense of -beauty. - -A most important branch of Byzantine ornamentation was the treatment -of metals. For flat decoration, in the style of embroidery, nothing -can excel the use of metal, be it gold, silver, bronze, or steel, or -a combination of all these. There was a fantastic originality in -these productions which, when combined with an assiduous study of the -antique, may aid us in many instances to produce excellent specimens -of book-covers, patterns for ornamented salvers, caskets, cups, -candlesticks, crosses, &c. Byzantine art, however, is the very opposite -of classic art. Repose, as a consequence of the liveliest vibration -of forms, and uniformity through a rich variation of patterns, are -the real elements of Byzantine and Oriental art; in contradistinction -to classic art, which is based on the authority of purpose and a -correct subordination of details. This is the reason why the free but -well-systematised ornaments of classic Greece were revived at this -period with Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian textile patterns in -metal, stone, or colours. Nothing could be more appropriate for this -mode of ornamentation than leaf-work, flowers, creepers, &c., in the -arrangement of which, the stern law of a well-regulated distribution of -the repeated forms must be observed, to bring about a thorough balance -between rest and vibration, variety and uniformity. - -Whilst Byzantium was exhausting all its powers, and socially and -artistically preparing to fall a prey to iconoclasts and Mahomedans; -the movement, next in importance to the establishment of Christianity, -viz. the migration of the Northern Teutons, took place. - -We intend to group Kelts, Normans, Franks, Ostrogoths, and Westrogoths -or Visigoths, Alemanni, Burgundians, Vinilians, Ingavorians, -Istavorians, Vandals, Saxons, Anglo-Saxons, Markomanni, Rugi, Ubi, -Gurgerni, Herulians, Bojoarians, Gepidi, Quadi, Marsingi, Sclavons, -&c., all under the one name of North-European Ayrans. It is an -imperative duty, with the art-historian, to group these scattered -elements together, according to some visible signs, which serve to -prove that, wherever we find an average facial angle of 90 deg., and -an amount of brain averaging 92 cubic inches, we have to deal with -the Aryan group of humanity. We avoid by this means divisions and -sub-divisions _ad infinitum_, and the danger of losing ourselves -in a labyrinth of petty national animosities and jealousies. Art, -based on ethnology, and a study of climatological influences, has -an immensely Christianising power. We see in the common language of -forms, a common bond between those who formed themselves into small -political communities, each in turn arrogating to themselves a kind -of _'chosen-people' superiority_, and turning their powers against -that very mother-stock from which they received life, vigour, a common -language, and a common mode of thinking on supernatural matters, and -the phenomena of nature. The Kelts, Normans, Saxons, Danes, Swedes, -Teutons, Germans (Garmans, Wahrmans, or Wehrmans, Brahmans), are all -of the same stock. Separated at different periods from their Trans-and -Cis-Himalayan ancestors, they lost more or less of their old religious -notions, customs, and manners, according to their lesser or greater -intermixture with the Turanian substrata of aborigines, who peopled -the countries wherein they settled. Next to the aspect of the country -in which they established themselves, its climate must be taken into -consideration. The Aryan, snowed in for six months in Scandinavia, or -living on the coasts of the Baltic, obliged to fight for every foot -of fertile ground with a boisterous and obstinate nature, must have -developed otherwise than the self-same Aryan who, as Kelt, took up his -abode on an island everlastingly green with refreshing verdure, and was -insulated from outer influences for long periods, being thus led to -look upon this detached spot as the very centre of the universe around -which the five parts of our globe, the myriads of suns, stars, planets, -and comets revolved. Between the Aryan-Kelt and the Aryan-Frank or -Norman, there will be a difference, brought about by the progress of -time and a freer intermixture with other branches of the mother-stock -who attained a higher kind of civilisation. The Aryans in India lost -themselves in metaphysical abstractions, and made of fire, water, and -air a theogony in which the anthropomorphic element was altogether -effaced. The Aryans in the north of Europe, in their cosmogony, held -to the original conceptions. They had to battle with fire, water, and -air, in the form of volcanoes, seas, rain, snow, hail and storms; and -finding that with their intellectual power they could master these -elements, they soon deprived them of their individual godhead, and -the whole earth, with its loves and passions, its kindnesses and -destructive tendencies, was looked upon as a living being. They also -knew of two regions on earth--not of a spiritually created paradise and -hell, but of a _Muspel-heim_ in the south, and a _Nifel-heim_ in the -north: the one giving warmth, heat, life; the other cold and death; -the one light, the other night; the one summer, and the other winter. -According to the Aryans of the north of Europe the first cosmical -heat produced the giant _Ymir_, or _Angelmir_, who was nourished by -the sacred cow _Audumbla_, from which ran four streams of milk, the -four seasons. Like Brahma, Ymir had a son and a daughter; the daughter -grew out of his arm, and the son out of his foot. The Brahman was the -outgrowth of Brahma's mouth: the Kshattriya sprung from his arms, -the Vaisya grew out of his thighs, and the S'udra out of his feet. -Ymir's son became the father of the Hirmthursen (giants). By licking -huge rocks of sandstone the cow became the mother of Buri. We thus -pass from the pastoral into the agricultural state, and have the -legend of Jupiter and Io before us. Buri had a son, Bor, who had three -sons. _Odin_, Guodan, Wuodan, Wodan, the All-pervader--the 'Allvater' -(father of all), _Willi_ and _We_--air, fire and water. Wodan was -also Baal, or the sun-god, in which capacity he had only _one eye_ -(the sun); he was also Apollo, the god of poetry, and of all things -that love light and goodness. He was also the warfaring god who led -the people to battle, and protected the valorous and virtuous. He had -to fight against the giant Ymir with his brothers. A reminiscence of -the wars of the Greek gods with the Titans, &c.; the Indian Vritaghna -or the Persian Veretaghna, with the evil spirits of darkness, or the -Egyptian Horus with Typhon. Out of the dead body of Ymir, the sons of -Bor created everything. They formed the earth of his flesh, the rocks -of his bones, the skull became heaven, and his blood furnished seas, -rivers, and streams. They then took four dwarfs and placed Austri (in -the East), Westri (in the West), Sudri (in the South), and Nordri (in -the North), to guard the four corners of the heavens. Wuodan then -embraced the earth, and created his mighty son _Thor_, Donar, Thunder, -the protector of his mother-earth, and the enemy of the wicked. He sent -his lightnings against giants, purified the air, dispersed frost and -cold, killed the demons of heat, silenced the destructive storms, built -bridges, made high-roads, furthered the intercourse of man with man, -and promoted civilisation. The second son of Wuodan was _Zio_ (Ziu, -Zeus, Jovis, Siva, also Tyr-Tiu or Tusco), the god of battles, the -destroyer. The third son was _Fro_ (Froho, Freyr, free), the happy god, -the god of love and marriage. Who does not recognise in Thor, Froh, and -Ziu--Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva--Jupiter, Apollo and Mars? As with the -Aryans on the Ganges, so also with those on the Rhine, the Elbe or the -Weser, and in Scandinavia, the passive element of nature was embodied -in female divinities. _Hertha_, Nerthus (the earth), corresponds -to S'ris, Hera, Ceres, Isis; _Holda_ is closely allied with Hilda, -Hela, Hell (the hidden), the goddess of death, Durga; and _Freyja_ -represents Venus, the goddess of love. These Aryans of northern Europe -were known to the ancients as Hyperboraeans. They were tall, blue-eyed, -fair-haired, addicted to fighting, and sport. Some of them erected, -in analogy with Buddhists and Egyptians, long thin towers reaching -high into the air, pointing mystically upwards. The 'Crux Ansata' is -reproduced in the Irish crosses, and their mode of ornamentation, with -its twisted rope-like windings, and its serpent-like entanglements, -points to Indian patterns of a very ancient type. When these Aryans -of the north of Europe first dashed into the south, and destroyed -the Roman colossus, they embraced Christianity with all the fervour -of their unbiassed hearts. Entirely given up to the culture of the -wild powers of nature, free from all metaphysical subtleties--the -genuine men of wild oak, pine, and beech forests--they had no Vedas, -no Homer, no Zoroaster, no Hermes, and no Moses to forget; they, in -fact, only knew of an Allvater, because no two Teuton tribes held -the same opinions on metaphysics. They had only one common ground, -honest work--_industry_ (at those times concentrated on warfare); and -therefore they received Christianity with the greatest eagerness, and -became the only upholders, expounders, and propagators of a religion -for which their hearts were created. They recognised in Christ's words, -what they heard in whispers in their legends, and in the experiences -of their wild life--that we ought to love others as ourselves. They -added some of their old superstitions to the pure faith, which they -found already much impregnated with Egyptian, Roman, and Indian signs -and symbols. In the beginning, whilst Christianity was spreading all -over Europe, they cultivated a mixture of North European and Roman -forms in architecture as well as in ornamentation. They constructed -their churches with plans borrowed from ancient times, and freely used -geometrical symbols--for the sign of the Indian Trimurty, that of the -shields of David or Solomon, and that of the Trinity, did not differ. -The pentagram is still made on every loaf the Germans bake; it was -a Druidical mystic sign, and now serves good Christians to protect -their bread from being eaten by evil spirits. If we look at our Tudor -roses, or St. Katherine's wheels, we may clearly trace their origin -to the Zodiacs of Egypt, used as signs of the _Makrokosm_. The Teuton -minds found themselves suddenly dazzled by Christian theology. Greek, -Alexandrian, Nestorian, Arian, Athanasian, Jewish and Christian mystics -and casuists, already abounded in the sunny Muspel-heim, in which the -Teutons settled, and they had to exchange their gloomy, foggy, and -stormy Nifel-heim of reality, for a spiritual Nifel-heim of doctrinal -controversies. They turned their elfs and sprites, their kobolds and -gnomes, their spirits of air, water, and fire, into so many evil -spirits. They looked upon the literature of the Greeks and Romans, -of which they knew nothing, as the work of Beelzebub. Art was an -enchantress of the senses, and sculpture invented by the father of all -'lies,' to deceive us with mock-creatures, to seduce men, and to cheat -them of their share in everlasting salvation. In this gloomy spirit the -newly converted Teuton Christians built churches, and, sunken in the -most atrocious superstition, occupied themselves with the casting out -of devils. Nature was, in fact, one grand dwelling-place for demons. -Plague, poverty, and sickness, were attributed to the agency of the -enemy of mankind. Epileptic fits and insanity were signs that the demon -had taken possession of unfortunate wretches, who were either tormented -or put to death. Satan, with his legions of devils, continually -harassed mankind. To mortify and kill the body by fasting, chanting, -whipping, praying, and self-inflicted mortification, was thought the -only worthy and cheerful occupation of mankind. In addition to these -religious tendencies, wars were waged with merciless cruelty, either in -favour of, or against the new Christian superstition. A few so-called -_learned_ theologians studied the Jewish Cabala, Egyptian mysteries, -Zoroastrian magical calculations, Greek sophisms, and Alexandrian -Neo-Platonism. How could art have flourished under such circumstances? -Incantations, astrological calculations, alchemical experiments, were -the order of the day. The few learned men, whether architects or -others, as soon as they produced anything astounding, were said to have -received their ideas or plans, or their powers, from the devil. Who was -to create any beautifully shaped product of art, surrounded by such -misgivings? - -This struggle lasted for several centuries; until, stimulated by -movements in the far East, the Christian world left its secluded haunts -in cloisters, monasteries, churches, and castles, and mixed once more -with the outer world, and the whole gloomy medley of Christianised -northern mythology had to yield to new forms in art. - -Of this period we have a quantity of wood and ivory carvings, swords -in the form of crosiers, and crosiers in the form of swords, cups and -candlesticks, censers and pastoral staffs, diptichs and triptichs, -recording scenes from the life of Christ or of some saint. From the -third century down to the twelfth, year by year, artistic products of -ornamentation grew worse and worse. In the third century there was some -naturalness in the drapery, the folds being well executed; but in the -fifth century the treatment of the human figure deteriorated; folds -became more rope-like; Christ was represented as very young, with or -without a beard, often retaining the form of Apollo, or of Hermes, -carrying a lamb (the good shepherd). Bodies of saints and holy persons -grew more and more emaciated; the anatomy was altogether neglected. -After the Crusades in the twelfth century a marked improvement took -place, but everything was then impregnated with Mahomedan forms. -We should look with deep interest, and a sense of filial piety, on -these primitive attempts of Christian art; the execution is bad, but -the sentiments spread by their carvings, faulty designs, and poor -ornamentations, are always excellent. The artists address us in a rough -and unskilful manner, yet some spiritual truth awakens our better -nature to exalted feelings of love. This, however, teaches us that a -good feeling, a devout spirit, or a religious sentiment in the artists, -is not alone enough to produce works of art. - -Whilst Europe was expending its powers in the re-arrangement of the -disturbed social and religious relations of humanity, a new movement -arose which threatened to overwhelm the whole world. - -The new movement produced new art forms, which in their turn serve to -prove that art is a most important factor of civilisation. Till lately, -the erroneous notion that art is a mere superfluous luxury has appeared -to prevail with us. Art was placed by the ethicists in opposition to -morals, and scientists either altogether ignored it, or regarded it as -diametrically opposed to science--a pretty but useless toy. Art is -as necessary to man as either ethics or science. For man is endowed -with an emotional element, which must be satisfied and cultivated, in -order to raise him to the dignity of a human being using his esthetical -and intellectual faculties. It is vain to attempt to draw lines of -demarcation, between our component material and spiritual elements. -We recognise, or become conscious, through our _senses_; we sift the -impressions made on our senses by the power of our _intellect_: and we -regulate and arrange these impressions with the aid of our _reason_. -We may, therefore, strictly treat art scientifically, as well as -historically. For works of art may be considered under the following -heads:-- - -(_a._) As the concrete embodiments of man's thoughts; the importance of -the historical study of which cannot be too strongly insisted upon, for -through it we can best become acquainted with the past, from a social -and religious point of view. - -(_b._) As products that act upon our emotional, intellectual, and -reasoning faculties. It is our duty to endeavour to ascertain what -forms at different times, and under various impressions, acted most -agreeably on us. We must learn to know the causes that produced certain -art forms at certain periods, amongst certain people, under certain -intellectual, social, and religious conditions. We must inquire why -such forms flourished, decayed, or revived at different times. - -(_c._) We may examine the relations in which our subjective impressions -stand to the products of art, and learn how far such sensations -developed, in time and space, to lead us to the consciousness of beauty. - -From pre-historic times to the advent of Christ humanity was always -engaged as a busy artist. In studying the history of man we find that -art ushers us into life, gladdens the child, inspires the youth, -and interests the man. All our public actions, all our religious -ceremonies, our Court pageantry, our battles and funerals, all our -useful or useless surroundings, pass more or less through an artistic -process. In analysing the historical development of humanity at large, -or that of a nation, or even that of single individuals, we find that -our sensations, intellect, and reason have always been at work to -create something in their respective spheres. From the times of Plato -to our own all great thinkers have more or less occupied themselves -with the endeavour to establish the principles of beauty; just as from -Thales of Miletus, and Demokritos to Bacon, Kant, Darwin, and Haeckel, -they have sought to discover the principle of truth; or from Manu, -Confucius, Moses, the Apostles, and Mahomet, to our own theologians, -they have striven to decide what is right or wrong. Art worked -synchronically with these endeavours, and its products are as numerous -and variegated as our philosophical systems, or our creeds and sects. -Moreover, works of art are, in many instances, far less perishable than -works of mere speculation. It becomes an imperative duty, therefore, to -study historically one of the most important branches of human activity -and ingenuity, which furnishes us in its very products with a record -in lasting forms, with at least the same ardour, earnestness, and -veneration, with which we devote ourselves to more varying, changing, -and perishable products. One fact must be obvious to every reader of -these pages--that real art has so exalted a sphere that it can only -exist to perfection wherever sciences and morals are highly cultivated. - -In cursorily summarising these pages, we find that wherever and -whenever beauty as the _ideal_, truth as the _real_, or goodness as the -_ethical_ element in humanity, has been one-sidedly cultivated, works -of art have not succeeded, for the harmony and union of these three can -alone be the aim of humanity. This harmonious union it is difficult to -attain, but we must endeavour to become historically conscious of the -continuous striving of humanity to bring it about. We find two forces -constantly at work in humanity--the one static (morals), the other -dynamic (intellect)--bent upon leading us to culture, progress, truth, -goodness, and beauty. In the fifth and at the beginning of the fourth -century B.C., for once in our development, and then only for a short -period, humanity undoubtedly succeeded in attaining a perfect balance -of its moral, intellectual, and esthetical faculties. We may well call -that period the golden age of mankind in art. We still live on the -mere interest of that immense capital which was left by the Greeks as -an imperishable legacy to humanity. Whatever the Greeks touched at -that period they transformed into pearls of beauty, gold of truth, and -jewels of goodness. They mounted the winged steed of imagination, and -were taken up to the bright heaven of pure idealisation, where they -saw boundless beauty in forms, and acquired an immortal striving after -truth and the eternal laws of goodness, based on the very organisation -of our complicated double nature. This dream of reality was short but -vivid. Humanity lives still in an ineffaceable longing and a burning -desire to regain that period. Like diamonds dropped in unknown ages in -small crystallisations into the sand of rivers, the works of Greece -appear in the stream of time, serving as a fundamental basis of beauty, -truth, and goodness. - -The well-balanced harmony was unfortunately soon disturbed. - -Giddy with victory and joy, the Greeks discarded ethics; truth was made -the handmaid of sophistry, superstition, and scepticism; and beauty, -in losing her ideal glory, sank into the depths of sensualism and -realism. The harmony of the triad, which artists, philosophers, and -moral teachers had succeeded in establishing, was destroyed, and a -discordant strain of melancholy woe resounded through history, echoing -here and there some remnants of the old and charming melodies. The -conquests of Philip of Makedon and Alexander the Great brought the -East into contact with the Greek spirit. The East furnished mystic -incomprehensibilities, and an egotistic hatred of all art that could -not be turned into money, or used for serving some deity to buy up its -good graces. Buddhistic tenets joined hands with Brahmanic conceits; -Egyptian symbols were intermingled with Hebrew practical enactments, -without any ideal aspirations. Greek philosophical diatribes were -used to prove the impossible possible, and the 'supernatural' most -natural. Some Greeks attempted to revive the antique mode of thinking, -but they were silenced by the Neo-Platonists, and thus the Greeks -themselves became the most successful apostles of unnaturally-shaped -superstitions, deadening the vivifying spirit of Christ's teachings. - -The Romans had only one aim in history--to regulate their conquests. -The State was everything with them; they taught us how to systematise -the actions of men, to make them useful citizens in this world, and, -when they left their legacy of infallible authority to the Romish -Church, how to prepare fit inhabitants for another world. The outward -realistic form, proclaiming some inward mystic grace or meaning, became -everything. Base hollowness in art and morals, vapid verbiage in -philosophy, unnatural profligacy and licentiousness, mean covetousness -and heartless egotism, brought humanity intellectually, morally, and -spiritually, to the brink of destruction. Everyone thirsted for a -change--reality was unbearable. - -Men strove, in deadening their bodies, to seek the salvation of their -souls. The realistic tendency of the degenerated ancient times gave -way to blind faith, which by degrees obtained an exclusive hold on the -ideal in man, ignoring his reflective and reasoning nature, working -only on the emotional, and burying antiquity under the gloomy ruins -of the Middle Ages. For more than 1000 years beauty had to yield to -mystic symbolism, truth to superstitious prejudice, and ethics to a -morbid sentimentality and a cruel hierarchical despotism. Dogmatic -scholasticism sought to foster elegance of forms; to create artistic -enthusiasm; but this attempt was vain. When, however, the dogmatic -ice began to melt in the burning rays of the rising sun of a freer -inquiry; when the Romish Church, anxious for some powerful helpmate to -check the rays of this sun, and work on the gloomy, stupified emotions -of the masses, called in to aid her the spirit of the Greeks in art, -she prepared a bright and happy future for humanity. The reformation -in art-forms, and the revival of the antique spirit in poetry, was -soon followed by a revival in science and ethics. Philosophy began to -unravel the mysteries of nature, and to make natural forces subservient -to man's wants and happiness. Ethics, based on freedom of thought, grew -day by day more powerful, and Greek forms were used in the purified -spirit of Christ, divested of strange and unintelligible dogmas. - -Having secured the right freely to store up the results of our -intellectual investigations, we must devote our artistic energies, -through an assiduous study of the historical development of art, to -a corresponding culture of our sense of beauty. This is essential, -if we hope to stand as high artistically, as we do technically and -mechanically. Without culture we cannot hope to vie with other -nations in high art, in historical paintings, frescoes, sculpture, -and architecture. A thorough knowledge of art-history will destroy -tasteless prejudices, and enable us progressively to develop the -past without becoming guilty of anachronisms. Inspired by the firm -conviction that the culture of taste leads to the very highest -development of ethics, and that art can only flourish in strict harmony -with truth and goodness, we can progress, but not otherwise. - -In this volume we have brought the reader down to the art of the -Mahomedans, and trust in a future work to trace the historical -development of art to our own times. What we have said in praise -of Greek art, must not be misunderstood to imply that, since it -flourished, we have not made gigantic progressive strides in -sculpture, architecture, and painting; but we have done so only when -we have worked in the Greek spirit, that is, on the principles which -stamped their works of art with perfection. - - - - -_BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR THE STUDY OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART._ - - - Agincourt, 'Histoire de l'Art par les Monuments'. 6 vols. Fol. - Paris, 1823. - - Asiatic Researches. - - - Birch, 'Ancient Pottery.' - - Blanc (Charles), 'Grammaire des Arts du Dessin.' Paris, 1870. - - Bohlen (von), 'Das alte Indian.' Koenigsberg, 1830. 2 vols. - - Boekh, Works, 1811. Leipzig. - - Botta and Flandin, 'Monuments de Ninive,' 1849. Paris. - - Boutell, 'Arms and Armour.' - - Brugsch, 'Histoire d'Egypte,' 1875. Leipzig. - - Bunsen, 'Place of Egypt in History of the World,' vol. 5. - - Burnouf, 'Introduction a l'Histoire du Buddhisme Indien.' Paris, - 1844. - - - Carriere (Moriz), 'Die Kunst im Zusammenhange der - Kulturentwickelung.' 5 vols. Leipzig; Brockhaus, 1871. - - Champollion, 'Lettres ecrites de l'Egypte.' - - 'Christy, Museum Catalogue,' 103 Victoria Street. By A. W. Franks, - M.A., Curator. Photographs of same. - - Cox, 'History of Mythology of Aryan Nations.' - - Cox, 'Manual of Ancient Mythology.' - - Cox, 'Mythology of the Aryan Nations.' Longmans, 1870. 2 vols. - - Creuzer (Dr. Friedrich), 'Symbolik und Mythologie.' Leipzig and - Darmstadt, 1836. 4 vols. - - Curtius, 'History of Greece.' - - - Darwin, 'Expression of the Emotions.' London, 1872. - - Davis (Sir J. F.), 'China.' John Murray, 1857. - - Denon, 'L'Egypte.' - - D'Hancarville, 'Recherches sur l'origine, l'esprit et le progres - des Arts de la Grece.' London, 1785. - - Dyer, 'History of the City of Rome.' - - Dyer, 'History of Rome.' 1864. - - Dyer, 'Pompei.' - - - Eber (Dr.), 'Aegypten und die Buecher Moses.' Leipzig, 1868. - - Egypt, Guide to. Written by Wilkinson. John Murray. - - Engelhardt, 'Denmark in the Old Iron Age.' London, 1866. - - 'Ethnological Society Transactions,' 1869. _Easter Island._ - - - Fellows, 'Asia Minor and Lycia.' - - Fergusson (J.), 'Indian Architecture.' - - Fergusson (J.), 'Palaces of Nineveh and Persepolis Restored.' - London, 1851. - - Figuier, 'Earth and Sea.' 1870. - - Flaxman, 'Lectures.' - - 'Fortnightly Review'--Spencer's articles on _Nature Worship_. - Chapman and Hall. - - - Gailhabaud, 'Monuments de l'Architecture.' - - Gau (F. C.), 'Antiquites de la Nubie.' Paris, 1821-27. - - Gibbon, 'History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.' - - Gladstone (Right Hon. W. E.), 'Homeric Synchronism.' London, 1876. - - Gould (Baring), 'Origin and Development of Religious Belief.' - Rivingtons, 1869. - - Grote, 'History of Greece.' - - Guilleman, 'Heavens.' - - - Harrison (Charles), 'Catalogue of a Series of Photographs from the - Collection of the British Museum.' W. A. Mansell & Co. - - Hegel, 'Aesthetik.' Berlin, 1842. 3 vols. - - Hegel, 'Philosophy of History.' - - Herder, 'Ideen zur Geschichte der Menschheit.' Stuttgart, 1827. 4 - vols. - - Hirt, 'Monography of the Temple of Solomon.' - - Hutcheson, 'An Inquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of Beauty and - Virtue.' London, 1729. - - Hyde, 'Historiae Religionis veterum Persarum.' Oxonii, 1700. - - - 'International Congress of Prehistoric Archaeology.' 1868. - - - Jennings (Hargrave), 'The Rosicrucians.' London, 1870. - - Jones (Owen), 'Apology for Colouring the Greek Court of the Crystal - Palace.' - - Jones (Sir Wm.), Works. London, 1799. 6 vols. 4to. - - - Kant, 'Aesthetik.' Leipzig, 1838. - - King, 'Antique Gems.' - - Kingsborough (Lord), 'Antiquities of Mexico.' London, 1831-48. 9 - vols. Imp. Folio. - - Klaproth, 'Nouv. Jour. Asiat.' vol. 5. - - - Layard, 'Nineveh.' - - Lenormant, 'Manual of the History of the East.' 2 vols. Asher and - Co., 1875. - - Lepsius, 'Denkmaeler.' Berlin. - - Lewes, 'Biographical History of Philosophy.' - - Lubbock, 'Origin of Civilization and Primitive Condition of Man.' - Particularly chapters on Religion, and page 119. 1870. - - Lubbock, 'Prehistoric Times.' - - Luebke (Dr.), 'History of Art.' Smith, Elder, and Co., 1868. - - - Madsen, 'Afbildinger af Danske Oldsager og Mindesmar.' Ker. - Kjobenhavn, 1872. - - 'Manual of Ethnology.' John Murray. - - Mommsen, 'Roemische Geschichte.' Berlin, 1868. - - Mueller (C. O.), 'Ancient Art and its Remains.' London: B. Quaritch, - 1852. - - Mueller (Max), 'Chips from a German Workshop.' Longmans, 1868. - - - Newton, 'Second Catalogue of Vase Rooms, British Museum.' - - Nott and G. R. Gliddon, 'Types of Mankind.' Dr. Morton. - - - Oppert (Dr. J.), 'Exped. scient. en Mesop.' - - - Parthey (Dr.), 'De Philis insula ejusque monumentis commentatis.' - Berolini, 1830. - - Philosophy. See Smith's 'Dictionary of the Bible.' - - Piper (Prof. Ferdinand), 'Mythologie der Christlichen Kunst.' - Weimar, 1847. - - Potter, 'Antiquities of Greece.' Edinburgh, 1818. - - 'Pyramid Builders of the Mississippi.' - - - Rawlinson, 'Herodotus.' - - Rawlinson, 'Manual of Ancient History.' - - Remusat (Abel), 'Melanges Asiatiques.' vol. 1. - - - Sandreczki (C.), 'Reise nach Mosul und durch Kurdistan.' Stuttgart, - 1857. 4 vols. - - Schliemann (Dr.), 'Discoveries at Hassarlik.' - - Schnaase (Dr. E.), 'Geschichte der Bildenden Kuenste.' Duesseldorf, - 1866. - - Schwegler, 'History of Philosophy.' - - Sef (Abd Alla), 'Relation de l'Egypte traduite par Silvestre de - Sacy.' Paris, 1810. - - Semper (Dr.), 'Die Textile Kunst.' Frankfurt a. M., 1860. - - Shaftesbury (Earl of), 'Characteristics.' 1743. 3 vols. - - Smith, 'Ancient History.' - - Smith, 'Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities.' - - Spruner, 'Historical Atlas.' - - Squier and Davis, 'Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley.' - - Stephens, 'Runic Monuments.' 2 vols. London, 1866. - - Stevens, 'Flint Chips.' Bell and Daldy, 1870. - - Stuart & Revett, 'Antiquities of Athens.' London, 1827. - - - Taine, 'Lectures on Art.' - - 'Traveller's Art Companion.' _Principal Sculptors._ See pages 414 - _et seq._ - - 'Traveller's Companion, The.' Bell and Daldy, 1868. - - Tylor, 'Primitive Culture.' London, 1871. - - - Uhlemann (Dr. Max), 'Thoth oder die Wissenschaft der alten - Aegypter.' Goettingen, 1855. - - - Valeriani (Prof. Domenico), 'Etrusco Museo Chiusino.' Poligrafia - Fiesolana, 1839. - - Vaux, 'British Museum.' - - Voguee (Le Comte de), 'Le Temple de Jerusalem.' Paris, 1864. - - - Wilkinson, 'Manners and Customs of Egyptians.' Murray, 1855. Small - edition. - - Winkelmann, Werke. 2 vols. - - Worsaae, 'Norse Antiquities.' Copenhagen, 1859. - - - Zerffi (Dr.), _Historic Art Studies_, with 1030 illustrations. - 'Building News,' 1872-6. - - - - -INDEX. - - - A, 84 - - {AO}, 272 - - Abulfeda, 35 - - Absolom, 150 - - Achaians, 180 - - Acherusian, 134 - - Achilles, 184 - - Action, 16 - - Adoniram, 146 - - Aeneas, 234 - - Aesop, 242 - - Aetna, 215 - - Agamemnon, 185 - - Ageladas, 193 - - Agesander, 207 - - Agincourt, 225 - - Agodhya, 77 - - Agromainyus, 89 - - Ahriman, 89 - - Ahura-Mazda, 89 - - Albans, 233 - - Alemanni, 283 - - Alexander the Great, 87 - - Alkibiades, 201 - - Alkmene, 185 - - Allegory, 270 - - Allvater, 286 - - Amn, 114 - - Amphiprostyle, 176 - - Anaxagoras, 193 - - Ancus Martius, 235 - - Andromeda, 250 - - Angeians, 180 - - Angelmir, 286 - - Antaetemple, 176 - - Anthemis of Tralles, 281 - - Antiope, 208 - - Antonines, 258 - - Anubis, 117 - - Apis, 189 - - Apollo at Bassae, 200 - - Apollo (Saurokthonos), 206 - - Apollo (Smintheus), 203 - - Apollodorus, 256 - - Apollonius, 207 - - Archaic-Doric, 178 - - Arch (Roman), 245 - - Ariadne, 190 - - Arians, 275 - - Aristotle, 187 - - Arkadia, 200 - - Arno, 213 - - Artemis of Ephesus, 189 - - Aryan, 26 - - Asar, 214 - - Asioatha, 80 - - Asklepios, 196 - - Asphaltites, 134 - - Athanasians, 275 - - Athene Promachos, 195 - - Athenodorus, 207 - - Atlas, 164 - - Atos (Akotus), 108 - - Attic-Doric, 178 - - Audumbla, 286 - - Augustus, 252 - - Aurelius Commodus, 241 - - Azer-Abad, 89 - - - Babylon, 97 - - Baltic, 285 - - Barucchi, 105 - - Bachante, 204 - - Basilica of Reparatus, 277 - - Beautiful, 3 - - Beelzebub, 290 - - Bendemir (Araxes), 91 - - Bengallee, 82 - - Bhima, 159 - - Boaz, 148 - - Boeckh, 104 - - Book of Deliverance, 113 - - Bor, 286 - - Botta, M., 88 - - Brahma, 64 - - Brahman, 85 - - Brahmapootra, 60 - - Bronze (age), 33 - - Brugsch, 105 - - Bryaxis, 205 - - Buddha, 75 - - Bunsen, 105 - - Burgundians, 284 - - Buri, 286 - - Byzantine, 270 - - Byzes of Naxos, 191 - - - Cadam, 89 - - Cainozoic, 180 - - Caracalla, 260 - - Carthage, 236 - - Carrios, 41 - - Catulus, M., 251 - - Cavoedium, 217 - - Celerus, 254 - - Chalukyan, 82 - - Champ-leve, 131 - - Champollion, 104 - - Cheops (Shufu), 119 - - Chephren (Shafra), 120 - - Chichen, 42 - - Chimera, 168 - - Chinese language, 46 - - Chinese trellis-work, 50 - - Chiron, 185 - - Choda (Gott, God), 84 - - Christianity, 263 - - Chuda (Khuda, Svadatta), 84 - - Cicero, 242 - - Cis-Himalayans, 61 - - Claudius, 253 - - Cleopatra, 253 - - Cloisonne, 131 - - Clusium, 218 - - Coati, 40 - - Colosseum, 255 - - Compluvium, 217 - - Confucius, 47 - - Constantine (triumphal arch), 256 - - Contractura, 175 - - Copan, 42 - - Corichanca, 41 - - Corneto, 220 - - Cortona, 213 - - Cranoges, 37 - - Crassus, L., 251 - - Critical (School of Art), 8 - - Cross-vault (Roman), 245 - - Crusades, 292 - - Crystallisations, 12 - - Cupid, 69 - - Cupola (Roman), 245 - - Cuzco, 41 - - Cynerary chests, 217 - - - Daghopa, 79 - - Daidalos, 190 - - Danaians, 180 - - Dante, 240 - - Dea Cloacina, 239 - - Dead (book of the), 112 - - Delphos, 188 - - Demeratos, 221 - - Demeter, 161 - - Demetrius, 271 - - Dempster, 225 - - Derush, 141 - - Devaki, 70 - - Dews (Devas), 96 - - Dialectic, 63 - - Dibutades, 181 - - Diodorus (Siculus), 100 - - Diogenes Laertius, 111 - - Diopos, 221 - - Dipteros, 176 - - Diptichs, 291 - - Dirke, 208 - - Disk heresy, 105 - - Divespitar, 67 - - Donatists, 275 - - Dos (Dyss, or Dolmens), 35 - - Dordogne, 34 - - Doric, 173 - - Dshemshid, 90 - - Dshey-Afram, 89 - - Dravidian, 82 - - Durga, 69 - - Dypuc, 69 - - - Echidna, 168 - - Eight Periods of Jewish History, 139 - - Echetlos, 215 - - Eirene, 202 - - Elbruz, 94 - - Elektra, 185 - - El Hayz, 277 - - El Kassr, 98 - - Encaustum, 131 - - Entasis, 176 - - Epimetheus, 164 - - Epistyle, 176 - - Erato, 165 - - Erechtheium, 179 - - Eriene Veedjo (Iran Veji), 89 - - Eros, 204 - - {ethos}, 188 - - Etruskans, 212 - - Etruskan style, 225 - - Euchier, 221 - - Eugrammos, 221 - - Euripides, 201 - - Eurythmy, 13 - - Euxine, 244 - - Euterpe, 165 - - Exarchs, 279 - - Expression, 16 - - Ezekiel, 139 - - - Farnese Bull, 207 - - Fascine constructions, 37 - - Faust, 164 - - Feather ornament, 126 - - Fervers, 96 - - Ficus Indica, 80 - - Ficus religiosa, 81 - - Figeac, 104 - - Flavians, 247 - - Fora (Civilia), 252 - - Fortuna Virilis (temple of), 251 - - Forum Trajanum, 255 - - Franks, 283 - - Freyja, 288 - - Froh (Freyr), 287 - - - Gaea, 160 - - Galpones, 41 - - Ganesa, 67 - - Ganges, 60 - - Ganymede, 68 - - Garuda, 68 - - Gepidi, 284 - - Geryon, 168 - - Ghandarvas, 200 - - Giallo antico, 262 - - Glaukos, 191 - - Glypthotek, 203 - - Gnostics, 275 - - Gurgerni, 284 - - - Hadrian, 247 - - Hal-her, 116 - - Hamadan (Erbatana), 92 - - Hamilton (Lord), 183 - - Hanau, 41 - - Harris, 73 - - Harpies, 219 - - Hassarlik, 189 - - Hathor-masks, 125 - - Herakles, 159 - - Hekatoncheires, 162 - - Hektor, 184 - - Hermetic books, 104 - - Here, 161 - - Herodotus, 35 - - Hertha (Nerthus, Earth), 288 - - Herulians, 284 - - Hes (Isis), 117 - - Hesiri (Osiris), 117 - - Hestia, 161 - - Hieratic style, 125 - - Hieroglyphs, 108 - - Hierogrammatists, 111 - - Hillel (Rabbi), 104 - - Himeros, 204 - - Hincks, 105 - - Hirmthursen, 286 - - Historical (School of Art), 7 - - Hittites, 34 - - Holda, 288 - - Horace, 242 - - Horoskopus, 111 - - Horus, 117 - - Hurin, 41 - - Hyksos, 105 - - Hypaethral, 176 - - - Ideography, 108 - - Iphikrates, 193 - - Iliad, 184 - - Impluvium, 217 - - Ingavorians, 284 - - Indus, 60 - - Ionic, 173 - - Iron (age), 33 - - Isidorus of Miletus, 281 - - Istavorians, 284 - - Is'wara, 69 - - Itza, 42 - - - Jachin, 148 - - Janus, 67 - - Japetos, 160 - - Jordan, 134 - - Jordanes, 34 - - Jugurtha, 237 - - Julius Caesar, 251 - - - Ka, 84 - - Kadmus, 157 - - Kalamis, 193 - - Kaledonian (boar), 202 - - Kaliphs, 87 - - Kaliya Naga, 71 - - Kalliope, 166 - - Kansa, 70 - - {katharsis}, 188 - - Kentaur, 218 - - Kekrops, 157 - - Kelts, 283 - - Kenrick, 105 - - Kentimanos, 160 - - Kephisodotus, 202 - - Kha, 84 - - Kham (Ham, Chemnus), 106 - - Khem, 114 - - Khai-Khorus (Kyrus), 87 - - Kimon, 190 - - Klio, 165 - - Kneph, 116 - - {koniasis}, 173 - - Korinthian, 173 - - Koroebus, 181 - - Kouyunjik, 93 - - Krishna, 70 - - Kronos, 160 - - Kshattriya, 85 - - Ktesias, 100 - - Kynic, 187 - - Kyprus, 44 - - Kyrenaeic, 187 - - - Labyrinth, 123 - - Lake-dwellings, 35 - - Laokoon, 207 - - Lapis lazuli, 262 - - Laplanders, 34 - - Lauth, 106 - - Layard, R. H., 88 - - Leah, 273 - - Lekythus, 186 - - Leochares, 205 - - Lepsius, 105 - - Lernean serpent, 168 - - Li-king, 47 - - Lotus, 126 - - Lukeres, 233 - - Lysippus, 201 - - - Maccabees, 133 - - Mahabharata, 73 - - Makedonian-Doric, 178 - - Makrokosm, 289 - - Mal'hura, 71 - - Man (Jao), 116 - - Manasseh Ben Israel, 135 - - Mania, 223 - - Manichaeans, 275 - - Mantus, 223 - - Manurra, 251 - - Marcus Aurelius, 258 - - Markomanni, 258 - - Masaya, 39 - - Mastadon, 213 - - Mausoleum (of Augustus), 253 - - Mausolos at Halikarnassus, 205 - - Medea, 250 - - Medusa, 185 - - Melas, 191 - - Melpomene, 165 - - Memnonium, 123 - - Memnons, 124 - - Memphis, 106 - - Mem-tsu, 47 - - Menes, 106 - - Menkerynus (Menkare), 120 - - Meshiah, 155 - - Metis, 161 - - Metopes, 176 - - Miaos, 53 - - Miltiades, 196 - - Milton, 240 - - {mimesis}, 188 - - Module, 174 - - Moltke, 41 - - Moses, 141 - - Motion, 16 - - Murghab, 92 - - Muspel-heim, 286 - - Mut, 114 - - Myths, 271 - - - Naksh-i-Rustam, 92 - - Negro, 23 - - Neolithic, 33 - - Nero, 253 - - Nestorians, 275 - - Net, 115 - - Nifel-heim, 286 - - Nike, 185 - - Nineveh, 97 - - Ninus, 90 - - Niobe, 206 - - Normans, 283 - - Num (Nu), 114 - - Numa Pompilius, 234 - - Nundi, 189 - - - Odin, 286 - - Okeanos, 160 - - Oligochromatic, 182 - - Olympian, Pythian, Nemaean, and Isthmian games, 171 - - Onatas, 193 - - Opisthodome, 175 - - Opus plumarium, 54 - - Orchia, 219 - - Ormuzd, 89 - - Orpheus, 157 - - Ostrogoths, 283 - - Ovid, 242 - - - Palenque, 42 - - Palm-tree, as ornament, 126 - - Palaeolithic, 33 - - Pantheon, 253 - - Paphos, 145 - - Papyrus, as ornament, 126 - - Parsagad (Passagarda or Persepolis), 91 - - Parthenon, 197 - - Patala, 71 - - Paulastya, 68 - - Pelasgians, 180 - - Penelope, 184 - - Pentagram, 289 - - Per-ao (Pharaoh), 107 - - Perigord, 34 - - Perikles, 193 - - Peripteros, 176 - - Peshat, 141 - - Perseus, 185 - - Perseus, 250 - - Phaedrus, 242 - - Pheidias, 193 - - Phigalia, 200 - - Philesian Apollo, 171 - - Phtah, 115 - - Pile-dwellings, 36 - - Pindar, 224 - - Planimetric, 17 - - Plato, 187 - - Plautus, 242 - - Pluton, 161 - - Pluton, 202 - - Polychromatic, 182 - - Polydoros, 207 - - Polyhymnia, 165 - - Polykrates, 191 - - Pompey, 143 - - Pontos, 160 - - Poseidon, 161, 203 - - Posticum, 175 - - Pothos, 204 - - Prasias, 35 - - Prathama-Raja, 75 - - Praxiteles, 193 - - Praeneste (Palestrina), 220 - - Prometheus, 164 - - Prophets, 112 - - Proportion, 19 - - Prostyle, 176 - - Proteus, 159 - - Proto-Doric, 178 - - Ptolemaic style, 129 - - Punic war, 236 - - Pythagoras of Regium, 193 - - - Quadi, 284 - - Quatusco, or Huatusco, 40 - - - Ra (with the Persians), 84 - - Ra, 115 - - Rachel, 273 - - Radamanthus, 223 - - Ramayana, 73 - - Ramnes, 233 - - Ravenna, 279 - - Realistic (School of Art), 7 - - Remes, 141 - - Rhoekos, 191 - - Roma (Amor), 229 - - Romanesque, 270 - - Romulus and Remus, 234 - - Rosetta-stone, 104 - - - Sabines, 233 - - Sacred books (of the Egyptians), 111 - - Sacsahuaman, 41 - - Sallust, 242 - - Samoyedes, 34 - - Sanchi Tope, 76 - - San Paolo fuori le mura, 278 - - Saul, 132 - - Scandinavia, 285 - - Scaurus, M., 251 - - Schliemann (Dr.), 189 - - Seb (Kronos), 116 - - Semiramis, 90 - - Septimus Severus, 247 - - Servius Tullius, 235 - - Seti, 115 - - Shi-king, 47 - - Shoo-king, 47 - - Siamek, 90 - - Skopas, 201 - - Skylla, 168 - - Smilis, 191 - - Sod, 141 - - Solomon, 138 - - Sophokles, 171 - - Sphinx, 168 - - Sphinxes (six kinds of), 120 - - S'ri, 68 - - Sta. Agnese, 272 - - Sta. Barbara, 274 - - Sta. Croce at Jerusalem, 277 - - Sta. Maria at Bethlehem, 277 - - St. Apollinare in Classe, 279 - - St. Calisto, 272 - - Stereometric, 17 - - Stiens (of Cambodia), 35 - - St. John, 274 - - St. Katherine's wheel, 289 - - St. Lorenzo, 272 - - Stolists, 112 - - St. Peter's at Rome, 277 - - St. Sebaldus, 274 - - St. Sebastian, 274 - - St. Sebastiano, 272 - - St. Sophia, 280 - - St. Vitale, 279 - - Sublime, 3 - - S'udra, 85 - - S'wa, 64 - - Symbol, 270 - - Symbolic, 63 - - Symmetry, 13 - - Syrakuse, 236 - - - Tachyno, 35 - - Tahamur, 90 - - Tarquinius Priscus, 235 - - Tarquinius Superbus, 235 - - Tartaros, 162 - - Tauriskos, 207 - - Tacitus, 242 - - Telos, 181 - - Temple, Egyptian, 122 - - Teni (This, Thinis), 106 - - Teotl, 39 - - Terence, 242 - - Terpsichore, 165 - - Teth (Toth, Hermes), 116 - - Thales, 213 - - Thalia, 165 - - Thebes, 123 - - Themistokles, 193 - - Theodorus, 191 - - Thera, 182 - - Thermae, 253 - - Thor, 287 - - Thukydides, 193 - - Tiberius, 253 - - Timotheos, 205 - - Tingitanum, 277 - - Titicaca, 40 - - Titians, 233 - - Titus Livy, 242 - - Tombs, Egyptian, 120 - - Trajan, 247 - - Trans-Himalayans, 61 - - Tree of Art, 28 - - Triglyphs, 176 - - Trilochana, 69 - - Trimurty, 65 - - Triophthalmos, 70 - - Tritons, 203 - - Tsem-tsu, 47 - - Tshao-Pings, 52 - - Tshil-Minar, 91 - - Tudor roses, 289 - - Tulasi, 71 - - Tullus Hostilius, 234 - - Turanian, 24 - - Tuscanicum, 217 - - Types, 271 - - Typhon (Nubi, or Set), 116 - - Tyrrhenian, 181 - - - Uhleman, 105 - - Ulpia (Basilica), 256 - - Ulysses, 184 - - Unger, 106 - - Urania, 165 - - Uranus, 160 - - Uraeus, 129 - - Uxmal, 42 - - - Va, 84 - - Vaisya, 85 - - Vandals, 284 - - Vauban, 41 - - Veretaghna, 287 - - Vesta, 251 - - Vesuvius, 222 - - Via Sacra, 255 - - Vinitians, 284 - - Virgil, 242 - - Vishnu, 64 - - Viterbo, 219 - - Volaterra, 218 - - Volci, 218 - - Vritaghna, 287 - - Vurka, 98 - - - Xp, 272 - - Xenophon, 193 - - - Yachahnasi, 41 - - Yamuna, 71 - - Y-King, 47 - - Ymir, 286 - - Yo-king, 47 - - Young, Dr., 104 - - - Zacharias, 150 - - Zahok, 90 - - Zarathustra (Zerdusht, Zoroaster), 94 - - Zedekiah, 132 - - Zend-Avesta, 88 - - Zeruane-Akerene, 95 - - Zeus, 162 - - Zorobabel, 142 - - Zui (or Tui, Tuisco), 287 - - - LONDON: PRINTED BY - SPOTTISWOODE AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUARE - AND PARLIAMENT STREET - - - - - * * * * * * - - - - -Transcriber's note: - -Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant -preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not changed. - -Simple typographical errors were corrected. - -Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were retained. - -Transcriber-added descriptions of some illustrations are in -parentheses, like this: [Illustration: (description)]. - -Some words were printed both with and without accent marks. The ones -clearly meant to be the same (e.g., Index references to the other form) -were changed; the rest appear both ways. - -Greek and symbols not in the Latin-1 or ASCII character sets have -been transliterated or substituted in those versions of this eBook. -The original letters and symbols might appear in the UTF-8 and HTML -versions. Devices unable to display such characters may substitute -question marks or other placeholders. - - - -***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A MANUAL OF THE HISTORICAL -DEVELOPMENT OF ART*** - - -******* This file should be named 44509.txt or 44509.zip ******* - - -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: -http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/4/4/5/0/44509 - - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at - www.gutenberg.org/license. - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 -North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email -contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the -Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/44509.zip b/44509.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 9926f6a..0000000 --- a/44509.zip +++ /dev/null |
