diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:23:19 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:23:19 -0700 |
| commit | a9efb9b725c81374a5fc28af986005bbc950a696 (patch) | |
| tree | 8a95776dc13c4387351f31308ffb7b072fe5351b /4346-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '4346-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 4346-h/4346-h.htm | 21480 |
1 files changed, 21480 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/4346-h/4346-h.htm b/4346-h/4346-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3e8f341 --- /dev/null +++ b/4346-h/4346-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,21480 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" +"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> +<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Effects of Cross & Self-fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom, by Charles Darwin</title> + +<style type="text/css" xml:space="preserve"> + +body { margin-left: 20%; + margin-right: 20%; + text-align: justify; } + +h1, h2, h3, h4, h5 {text-align: center; font-style: normal; font-weight: +normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-top: .5em; margin-bottom: .5em;} + +h1 {font-size: 300%; + margin-top: 0.6em; + margin-bottom: 0.6em; + letter-spacing: 0.12em; + word-spacing: 0.2em; + text-indent: 0em;} +h2 {font-size: 150%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 1em;} +h3 {font-size: 130%; margin-top: 1em;} +h4 {font-size: 120%;} +h5 {font-size: 110%;} + +.no-break {page-break-before: avoid;} /* for epubs */ + +hr {width: 80%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em;} + +p {text-indent: 1em; + margin-top: 0.25em; + margin-bottom: 0.25em; } + +.toc { margin-left: 10%; margin-bottom: .75em;} + +pre { font-style: italic; font-size: 90%; margin-left: 10%;} + +a:link {color:blue; text-decoration:none} +a:visited {color:blue; text-decoration:none} +a:hover {color:red} + +</style> + </head> + <body> + +<div style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Effects of Cross & Self-Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom, by Charles Darwin</div> +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and +most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions +whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms +of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online +at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you +are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the +country where you are located before using this eBook. +</div> +<div style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: The Effects of Cross & Self-Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom</div> +<div style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: Charles Darwin</div> +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: January 12, 2002 [eBook #4346]<br /> +[Most recently updated: January 2, 2022]</div> +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</div> +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Character set encoding: UTF-8</div> +<div style='display:block; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Produced by: Sue Asscher and David Widger</div> +<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EFFECTS OF CROSS & SELF-FERTILISATION IN THE VEGETABLE KINGDOM ***</div> + +<h1>THE EFFECTS OF CROSS & SELF-FERTILISATION IN THE VEGETABLE KINGDOM.</h1> + +<h2 class="no-break">By Charles Darwin</h2> + +<hr /> + + <p> + <b>CONTENTS</b> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0001"> DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0002"> THE EFFECTS OF CROSS AND SELF-FERTILISATION IN + THE VEGETABLE KINGDOM. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0001"> CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0002"> CHAPTER II. CONVOLVULACEAE. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0003"> CHAPTER III. SCROPHULARIACEAE, GESNERIACEAE, + LABIATAE, ETC. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0004"> CHAPTER IV. CRUCIFERAE, PAPAVERACEAE, RESEDACEAE, + ETC. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0005"> CHAPTER V. GERANIACEAE, LEGUMINOSAE, ONAGRACEAE, + ETC. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0006"> CHAPTER VI. SOLANACEAE, PRIMULACEAE, POLYGONEAE, + ETC. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0007"> CHAPTER VII. A SUMMARY OF THE HEIGHTS AND WEIGHTS + OF THE CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0008"> CHAPTER VIII. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CROSSED AND + SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL VIGOUR AND IN OTHER RESPECTS. + </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0009"> CHAPTER IX. THE EFFECTS OF CROSS-FERTILISATION + AND SELF-FERTILISATION ON THE PRODUCTION OF SEEDS. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0010"> CHAPTER X. MEANS OF FERTILISATION. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0011"> CHAPTER XI. THE HABITS OF INSECTS IN RELATION TO + THE FERTILISATION OF FLOWERS. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2HCH0012"> CHAPTER XII. GENERAL RESULTS. </a> + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0001" id="link2H_4_0001"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS + </h2> + <h3> + I. + </h3> + <h3> + INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. + </h3> + <p> + Various means which favour or determine the cross-fertilisation of plants.—Benefits + derived from cross-fertilisation.—Self-fertilisation favourable to + the propagation of the species.—Brief history of the subject.—Object + of the experiments, and the manner in which they were tried.—Statistical + value of the measurements.—The experiments carried on during several + successive generations.—Nature of the relationship of the plants in + the later generations.—Uniformity of the conditions to which the + plants were subjected.—Some apparent and some real causes of error.—Amount + of pollen employed.—Arrangement of the work.—Importance of the + conclusions. + </p> + <h3> + II. + </h3> + <h3> + CONVOLVULACEAE. + </h3> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea, comparison of the height and fertility of the crossed + and self-fertilised plants during ten successive generations.—Greater + constitutional vigour of the crossed plants.—The effects on the + offspring of crossing different flowers on the same plant, instead of + crossing distinct individuals.—The effects of a cross with a fresh + stock.—The descendants of the self-fertilised plant named Hero.—Summary + on the growth, vigour, and fertility of the successive crossed and + self-fertilised generations.—Small amount of pollen in the anthers + of the self-fertilised plants of the later generations, and the sterility + of their first-produced flowers.—Uniform colour of the flowers + produced by the self-fertilised plants.—The advantage from a cross + between two distinct plants depends on their differing in constitution. + </p> + <h3> + III. + </h3> + <h3> + SCROPHULARIACEAE, GESNERIACEAE, LABIATAE, ETC. + </h3> + <p> + Mimulus luteus; height, vigour, and fertility of the crossed and + self-fertilised plants of the first four generations.—Appearance of + a new, tall, and highly self-fertile variety.—Offspring from a cross + between self-fertilised plants.—Effects of a cross with a fresh + stock.—Effects of crossing flowers on the same plant.—Summary + on Mimulus luteus.—Digitalis purpurea, superiority of the crossed + plants.—Effects of crossing flowers on the same plant.—Calceolaria.—Linaria + vulgaris.—Verbascum thapsus.—Vandellia nummularifolia.—Cleistogene + flowers.—Gesneria pendulina.—Salvia coccinea.—Origanum + vulgare, great increase of the crossed plants by stolons.—Thunbergia + alata. + </p> + <h3> + IV. + </h3> + <h3> + CRUCIFERAE, PAPAVERACEAE, RESEDACEAE, ETC. + </h3> + <p> + Brassica oleracea, crossed and self-fertilised plants.—Great effect + of a cross with a fresh stock on the weight of the offspring.—Iberis + umbellata.—Papaver vagum.—Eschscholtzia californica, seedlings + from a cross with a fresh stock not more vigorous, but more fertile than + the self-fertilised seedlings.—Reseda lutea and odorata, many + individuals sterile with their own pollen.—Viola tricolor, wonderful + effects of a cross.—Adonis aestivalis.—Delphinium consolida.—Viscaria + oculata, crossed plants hardly taller, but more fertile than the + self-fertilised.—Dianthus caryophyllus, crossed and self-fertilised + plants compared for four generations.—Great effects of a cross with + a fresh stock.—Uniform colour of the flowers on the self-fertilised + plants.—Hibiscus africanus. + </p> + <h3> + V. + </h3> + <h3> + GERANIACEAE, LEGUMINOSAE, ONAGRACEAE, ETC. + </h3> + <p> + Pelargonium zonale, a cross between plants propagated by cuttings does no + good.—Tropaeolum minus.—Limnanthes douglasii.—Lupinus + luteus and pilosus.—Phaseolus multiflorus and vulgaris.—Lathyrus + odoratus, varieties of, never naturally intercross in England.—Pisum + sativum, varieties of, rarely intercross, but a cross between them highly + beneficial.—Sarothamnus scoparius, wonderful effects of a cross.—Ononis + minutissima, cleistogene flowers of.—Summary on the Leguminosae.—Clarkia + elegans.—Bartonia aurea.—Passiflora gracilis.—Apium + petroselinum.—Scabiosa atropurpurea.—Lactuca sativa.—Specularia + speculum.—Lobelia ramosa, advantages of a cross during two + generations.—Lobelia fulgens.—Nemophila insignis, great + advantages of a cross.—Borago officinalis.—Nolana prostrata. + </p> + <h3> + VI. + </h3> + <h3> + SOLANACEAE, PRIMULACEAE, POLYGONEAE, ETC. + </h3> + <p> + Petunia violacea, crossed and self-fertilised plants compared for four + generations.—Effects of a cross with a fresh stock.—Uniform + colour of the flowers on the self-fertilised plants of the fourth + generation.—Nicotiana tabacum, crossed and self-fertilised plants of + equal height.—Great effects of a cross with a distinct sub-variety + on the height, but not on the fertility, of the offspring.—Cyclamen + persicum, crossed seedlings greatly superior to the self-fertilised.—Anagallis + collina.—Primula veris.—Equal-styled variety of Primula veris, + fertility of, greatly increased by a cross with a fresh stock.—Fagopyrum + esculentum.—Beta vulgaris.—Canna warscewiczi, crossed and + self-fertilised plants of equal height.—Zea mays.—Phalaris + canariensis. + </p> + <h3> + VII. + </h3> + <p> + A SUMMARY OF THE HEIGHTS AND WEIGHTS OF THE CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED + PLANTS. + </p> + <p> + Number of species and plants measured.—Tables given.—Preliminary + remarks on the offspring of plants crossed by a fresh stock.—Thirteen + cases specially considered.—The effects of crossing a + self-fertilised plant either by another self-fertilised plant or by an + intercrossed plant of the old stock.—Summary of the results.—Preliminary + remarks on the crossed and self-fertilised plants of the same stock.—The + twenty-six exceptional cases considered, in which the crossed plants did + not exceed greatly in height the self-fertilised.—Most of these + cases shown not to be real exceptions to the rule that cross-fertilisation + is beneficial.—Summary of results.—Relative weights of the + crossed and self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <h3> + VIII. + </h3> + <p> + DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL + VIGOUR AND IN OTHER RESPECTS. + </p> + <p> + Greater constitutional vigour of crossed plants.—The effects of + great crowding.—Competition with other kinds of plants.—Self-fertilised + plants more liable to premature death.—Crossed plants generally + flower before the self-fertilised.—Negative effects of intercrossing + flowers on the same plant.—Cases described.—Transmission of + the good effects of a cross to later generations.—Effects of + crossing plants of closely related parentage.—Uniform colour of the + flowers on plants self-fertilised during several generations and + cultivated under similar conditions. + </p> + <h3> + IX. + </h3> + <p> + THE EFFECTS OF CROSS-FERTILISATION AND SELF-FERTILISATION ON THE + PRODUCTION OF SEEDS. + </p> + <p> + Fertility of plants of crossed and self-fertilised parentage, both lots + being fertilised in the same manner.—Fertility of the parent-plants + when first crossed and self-fertilised, and of their crossed and + self-fertilised offspring when again crossed and self-fertilised.—Comparison + of the fertility of flowers fertilised with their own pollen and with that + from other flowers on the same plant.—Self-sterile plants.—Causes + of self-sterility.—The appearance of highly self-fertile varieties.—Self-fertilisation + apparently in some respects beneficial, independently of the assured + production of seeds.—Relative weights and rates of germination of + seeds from crossed and self-fertilised flowers. + </p> + <h3> + X. + </h3> + <h3> + MEANS OF FERTILISATION. + </h3> + <p> + Sterility and fertility of plants when insects are excluded.—The + means by which flowers are cross-fertilised.—Structures favourable + to self-fertilisation.—Relation between the structure and + conspicuousness of flowers, the visits of insects, and the advantages of + cross-fertilisation.—The means by which flowers are fertilised with + pollen from a distinct plant.—Greater fertilising power of such + pollen.—Anemophilous species.—Conversion of anemophilous + species into entomophilous.—Origin of nectar.—Anemophilous + plants generally have their sexes separated.—Conversion of diclinous + into hermaphrodite flowers.—Trees often have their sexes separated. + </p> + <h3> + XI. + </h3> + <h3> + THE HABITS OF INSECTS IN RELATION TO THE FERTILISATION OF FLOWERS. + </h3> + <p> + Insects visit the flowers of the same species as long as they can.—Cause + of this habit.—Means by which bees recognise the flowers of the same + species.—Sudden secretion of nectar.—Nectar of certain flowers + unattractive to certain insects.—Industry of bees, and the number of + flowers visited within a short time.—Perforation of the corolla by + bees.—Skill shown in the operation.—Hive-bees profit by the + holes made by humble-bees.—Effects of habit.—The motive for + perforating flowers to save time.—Flowers growing in crowded masses + chiefly perforated. + </p> + <h3> + XII. + </h3> + <h3> + GENERAL RESULTS. + </h3> + <p> + Cross-fertilisation proved to be beneficial, and self-fertilisation + injurious.—Allied species differ greatly in the means by which + cross-fertilisation is favoured and self-fertilisation avoided.—The + benefits and evils of the two processes depend on the degree of + differentiation in the sexual elements.—The evil effects not due to + the combination of morbid tendencies in the parents.—Nature of the + conditions to which plants are subjected when growing near together in a + state of nature or under culture, and the effects of such conditions.—Theoretical + considerations with respect to the interaction of differentiated sexual + elements.—Practical lessons.—Genesis of the two sexes.—Close + correspondence between the effects of cross-fertilisation and + self-fertilisation, and of the legitimate and illegitimate unions of + heterostyled plants, in comparison with hybrid unions. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0002" id="link2H_4_0002"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + THE EFFECTS OF CROSS AND SELF-FERTILISATION IN THE VEGETABLE KINGDOM. + </h2> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0001" id="link2HCH0001"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Various means which favour or determine the cross-fertilisation of plants. + Benefits derived from cross-fertilisation. + Self-fertilisation favourable to the propagation of the species. + Brief history of the subject. + Object of the experiments, and the manner in which they were tried. + Statistical value of the measurements. + The experiments carried on during several successive generations. + Nature of the relationship of the plants in the later generations. + Uniformity of the conditions to which the plants were subjected. + Some apparent and some real causes of error. + Amount of pollen employed. + Arrangement of the work. + Importance of the conclusions. +</pre> + <p> + There is weighty and abundant evidence that the flowers of most kinds of + plants are constructed so as to be occasionally or habitually + cross-fertilised by pollen from another flower, produced either by the + same plant, or generally, as we shall hereafter see reason to believe, by + a distinct plant. Cross-fertilisation is sometimes ensured by the sexes + being separated, and in a large number of cases by the pollen and stigma + of the same flower being matured at different times. Such plants are + called dichogamous, and have been divided into two sub-classes: + proterandrous species, in which the pollen is mature before the stigma, + and proterogynous species, in which the reverse occurs; this latter form + of dichogamy not being nearly so common as the other. Cross-fertilisation + is also ensured, in many cases, by mechanical contrivances of wonderful + beauty, preventing the impregnation of the flowers by their own pollen. + There is a small class of plants, which I have called dimorphic and + trimorphic, but to which Hildebrand has given the more appropriate name of + heterostyled; this class consists of plants presenting two or three + distinct forms, adapted for reciprocal fertilisation, so that, like plants + with separate sexes, they can hardly fail to be intercrossed in each + generation. The male and female organs of some flowers are irritable, and + the insects which touch them get dusted with pollen, which is thus + transported to other flowers. Again, there is a class, in which the ovules + absolutely refuse to be fertilised by pollen from the same plant, but can + be fertilised by pollen from any other individual of the same species. + There are also very many species which are partially sterile with their + own pollen. Lastly, there is a large class in which the flowers present no + apparent obstacle of any kind to self-fertilisation, nevertheless these + plants are frequently intercrossed, owing to the prepotency of pollen from + another individual or variety over the plant’s own pollen. + </p> + <p> + As plants are adapted by such diversified and effective means for + cross-fertilisation, it might have been inferred from this fact alone that + they derived some great advantage from the process; and it is the object + of the present work to show the nature and importance of the benefits thus + derived. There are, however, some exceptions to the rule of plants being + constructed so as to allow of or to favour cross-fertilisation, for some + few plants seem to be invariably self-fertilised; yet even these retain + traces of having been formerly adapted for cross-fertilisation. These + exceptions need not make us doubt the truth of the above rule, any more + than the existence of some few plants which produce flowers, and yet never + set seed, should make us doubt that flowers are adapted for the production + of seed and the propagation of the species. + </p> + <p> + We should always keep in mind the obvious fact that the production of seed + is the chief end of the act of fertilisation; and that this end can be + gained by hermaphrodite plants with incomparably greater certainty by + self-fertilisation, than by the union of the sexual elements belonging to + two distinct flowers or plants. Yet it is as unmistakably plain that + innumerable flowers are adapted for cross-fertilisation, as that the teeth + and talons of a carnivorous animal are adapted for catching prey; or that + the plumes, wings, and hooks of a seed are adapted for its dissemination. + Flowers, therefore, are constructed so as to gain two objects which are, + to a certain extent, antagonistic, and this explains many apparent + anomalies in their structure. The close proximity of the anthers to the + stigma in a multitude of species favours, and often leads, to + self-fertilisation; but this end could have been gained far more safely if + the flowers had been completely closed, for then the pollen would not have + been injured by the rain or devoured by insects, as often happens. + Moreover, in this case, a very small quantity of pollen would have been + sufficient for fertilisation, instead of millions of grains being + produced. But the openness of the flower and the production of a great and + apparently wasteful amount of pollen are necessary for + cross-fertilisation. These remarks are well illustrated by the plants + called cleistogene, which bear on the same stock two kinds of flowers. The + flowers of the one kind are minute and completely closed, so that they + cannot possibly be crossed; but they are abundantly fertile, although + producing an extremely small quantity of pollen. The flowers of the other + kind produce much pollen and are open; and these can be, and often are, + cross-fertilised. Hermann Muller has also made the remarkable discovery + that there are some plants which exist under two forms; that is, produce + on distinct stocks two kinds of hermaphrodite flowers. The one form bears + small flowers constructed for self-fertilisation; whilst the other bears + larger and much more conspicuous flowers plainly constructed for + cross-fertilisation by the aid of insects; and without their aid these + produce no seed. + </p> + <p> + The adaptation of flowers for cross-fertilisation is a subject which has + interested me for the last thirty-seven years, and I have collected a + large mass of observations, but these are now rendered superfluous by the + many excellent works which have been lately published. In the year 1857 I + wrote a short paper on the fertilisation of the kidney bean (1/1. + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1857 page 725 and 1858 pages 824 and 844. ‘Annals + and Magazine of Natural History’ 3rd series volume 2 1858 page 462.); and + in 1862 my work ‘On the Contrivances by which British and Foreign Orchids + are Fertilised by Insects’ appeared. It seemed to me a better plan to work + out one group of plants as carefully as I could, rather than to publish + many miscellaneous and imperfect observations. My present work is the + complement of that on Orchids, in which it was shown how admirably these + plants are constructed so as to permit of, or to favour, or to necessitate + cross-fertilisation. The adaptations for cross-fertilisation are perhaps + more obvious in the Orchideae than in any other group of plants, but it is + an error to speak of them, as some authors have done, as an exceptional + case. The lever-like action of the stamens of Salvia (described by + Hildebrand, Dr. W. Ogle, and others), by which the anthers are depressed + and rubbed on the backs of bees, shows as perfect a structure as can be + found in any orchid. Papilionaceous flowers, as described by various + authors—for instance, by Mr. T.H. Farrer—offer innumerable + curious adaptations for cross-fertilisation. The case of Posoqueria + fragrans (one of the Rubiaceae), is as wonderful as that of the most + wonderful orchid. The stamens, according to Fritz Muller, are irritable, + so that as soon as a moth visits a flower, the anthers explode and cover + the insect with pollen; one of the filaments which is broader than the + others then moves and closes the flower for about twelve hours, after + which time it resumes its original position. (1/2. ‘Botanische Zeitung’ + 1866 page 129.) Thus the stigma cannot be fertilised by pollen from the + same flower, but only by that brought by a moth from some other flower. + Endless other beautiful contrivances for this same purpose could be + specified. + </p> + <p> + Long before I had attended to the fertilisation of flowers, a remarkable + book appeared in 1793 in Germany, ‘Das Entdeckte Geheimniss der Natur,’ by + C.K. Sprengel, in which he clearly proved by innumerable observations, how + essential a part insects play in the fertilisation of many plants. But he + was in advance of his age, and his discoveries were for a long time + neglected. Since the appearance of my book on Orchids, many excellent + works on the fertilisation of flowers, such as those by Hildebrand, + Delpino, Axell and Hermann Muller, and numerous shorter papers, have been + published. (1/3. Sir John Lubbock has given an interesting summary of the + whole subject in his ‘British Wild Flowers considered in relation to + Insects’ 1875. Hermann Muller’s work ‘Die Befruchtung der Blumen durch + Insekten’ 1873, contains an immense number of original observations and + generalisations. It is, moreover, invaluable as a repertory with + references to almost everything which has been published on the subject. + His work differs from that of all others in specifying what kinds of + insects, as far as known, visit the flowers of each species. He likewise + enters on new ground, by showing not only that flowers are adapted for + their own good to the visits of certain insects; but that the insects + themselves are excellently adapted for procuring nectar or pollen from + certain flowers. The value of H. Muller’s work can hardly be + over-estimated, and it is much to be desired that it should be translated + into English. Severin Axell’s work is written in Swedish, so that I have + not been able to read it.) A list would occupy several pages, and this is + not the proper place to give their titles, as we are not here concerned + with the means, but with the results of cross-fertilisation. No one who + feels interest in the mechanism by which nature effects her ends, can read + these books and memoirs without the most lively interest. + </p> + <p> + From my own observations on plants, guided to a certain extent by the + experience of the breeders of animals, I became convinced many years ago + that it is a general law of nature that flowers are adapted to be crossed, + at least occasionally, by pollen from a distinct plant. Sprengel at times + foresaw this law, but only partially, for it does not appear that he was + aware that there was any difference in power between pollen from the same + plant and from a distinct plant. In the introduction to his book (page 4) + he says, as the sexes are separated in so many flowers, and as so many + other flowers are dichogamous, “it appears that nature has not willed that + any one flower should be fertilised by its own pollen.” Nevertheless, he + was far from keeping this conclusion always before his mind, or he did not + see its full importance, as may be perceived by anyone who will read his + observations carefully; and he consequently mistook the meaning of various + structures. But his discoveries are so numerous and his work so excellent, + that he can well afford to bear a small amount of blame. A most capable + judge, H. Muller, likewise says: “It is remarkable in how very many cases + Sprengel rightly perceived that pollen is necessarily transported to the + stigmas of other flowers of the same species by the insects which visit + them, and yet did not imagine that this transportation was of any service + to the plants themselves.” (1/4. ‘Die Befruchtung der Blumen’ 1873 page 4. + His words are: “Es ist merkwurdig, in wie zahlreichen Fallen Sprengel + richtig erkannte, dass durch die Besuchenden Insekten der Bluthenstaub mit + Nothwendigkeit auf die Narben anderer Bluthen derselben Art ubertragen + wird, ohne auf die Vermuthung zu kommen, dass in dieser Wirkung der Nutzen + des Insektenbesuches fur die Pflanzen selbst gesucht werden musse.”) + </p> + <p> + Andrew Knight saw the truth much more clearly, for he remarks, “Nature + intended that a sexual intercourse should take place between neighbouring + plants of the same species.” (1/5. ‘Philosophical Transactions’ 1799 page + 202.) After alluding to the various means by which pollen is transported + from flower to flower, as far as was then imperfectly known, he adds, + “Nature has something more in view than that its own proper males would + fecundate each blossom.” In 1811 Kolreuter plainly hinted at the same law, + as did afterwards another famous hybridiser of plants, Herbert. (1/6. + Kolreuter ‘Mem. de l’Acad. de St. Petersbourg’ tome 3 1809 published 1811 + page 197. After showing how well the Malvaceae are adapted for + cross-fertilisation, he asks, “An id aliquid in recessu habeat, quod + hujuscemodi flores nunquam proprio suo pulvere, sed semper eo aliarum suae + speciei impregnentur, merito quaeritur? Certe natura nil facit frustra.” + Herbert ‘Amaryllidaceae, with a Treatise on Cross-bred Vegetables’ 1837.) + But none of these distinguished observers appear to have been sufficiently + impressed with the truth and generality of the law, so as to insist on it + and impress their beliefs on others. + </p> + <p> + In 1862 I summed up my observations on Orchids by saying that nature + “abhors perpetual self-fertilisation.” If the word perpetual had been + omitted, the aphorism would have been false. As it stands, I believe that + it is true, though perhaps rather too strongly expressed; and I should + have added the self-evident proposition that the propagation of the + species, whether by self-fertilisation or by cross-fertilisation, or + asexually by buds, stolons, etc. is of paramount importance. Hermann + Muller has done excellent service by insisting repeatedly on this latter + point. + </p> + <p> + It often occurred to me that it would be advisable to try whether + seedlings from cross-fertilised flowers were in any way superior to those + from self-fertilised flowers. But as no instance was known with animals of + any evil appearing in a single generation from the closest possible + interbreeding, that is between brothers and sisters, I thought that the + same rule would hold good with plants; and that it would be necessary at + the sacrifice of too much time to self-fertilise and intercross plants + during several successive generations, in order to arrive at any result. I + ought to have reflected that such elaborate provisions favouring + cross-fertilisation, as we see in innumerable plants, would not have been + acquired for the sake of gaining a distant and slight advantage, or of + avoiding a distant and slight evil. Moreover, the fertilisation of a + flower by its own pollen corresponds to a closer form of interbreeding + than is possible with ordinary bi-sexual animals; so that an earlier + result might have been expected. + </p> + <p> + I was at last led to make the experiments recorded in the present volume + from the following circumstance. For the sake of determining certain + points with respect to inheritance, and without any thought of the effects + of close interbreeding, I raised close together two large beds of + self-fertilised and crossed seedlings from the same plant of Linaria + vulgaris. To my surprise, the crossed plants when fully grown were plainly + taller and more vigorous than the self-fertilised ones. Bees incessantly + visit the flowers of this Linaria and carry pollen from one to the other; + and if insects are excluded, the flowers produce extremely few seeds; so + that the wild plants from which my seedlings were raised must have been + intercrossed during all previous generations. It seemed therefore quite + incredible that the difference between the two beds of seedlings could + have been due to a single act of self-fertilisation; and I attributed the + result to the self-fertilised seeds not having been well ripened, + improbable as it was that all should have been in this state, or to some + other accidental and inexplicable cause. During the next year, I raised + for the same purpose as before two large beds close together of + self-fertilised and crossed seedlings from the carnation, Dianthus + caryophyllus. This plant, like the Linaria, is almost sterile if insects + are excluded; and we may draw the same inference as before, namely, that + the parent-plants must have been intercrossed during every or almost every + previous generation. Nevertheless, the self-fertilised seedlings were + plainly inferior in height and vigour to the crossed. + </p> + <p> + My attention was now thoroughly aroused, for I could hardly doubt that the + difference between the two beds was due to the one set being the offspring + of crossed, and the other of self-fertilised flowers. Accordingly I + selected almost by hazard two other plants, which happened to be in flower + in the greenhouse, namely, Mimulus luteus and Ipomoea purpurea, both of + which, unlike the Linaria and Dianthus, are highly self-fertile if insects + are excluded. Some flowers on a single plant of both species were + fertilised with their own pollen, and others were crossed with pollen from + a distinct individual; both plants being protected by a net from insects. + The crossed and self-fertilised seeds thus produced were sown on opposite + sides of the same pots, and treated in all respects alike; and the plants + when fully grown were measured and compared. With both species, as in the + cases of the Linaria and Dianthus, the crossed seedlings were + conspicuously superior in height and in other ways to the self-fertilised. + I therefore determined to begin a long series of experiments with various + plants, and these were continued for the following eleven years; and we + shall see that in a large majority of cases the crossed beat the + self-fertilised plants. Several of the exceptional cases, moreover, in + which the crossed plants were not victorious, can be explained. + </p> + <p> + It should be observed that I have spoken for the sake of brevity, and + shall continue to do so, of crossed and self-fertilised seeds, seedlings, + or plants; these terms implying that they are the product of crossed or + self-fertilised flowers. Cross-fertilisation always means a cross between + distinct plants which were raised from seeds and not from cuttings or + buds. Self-fertilisation always implies that the flowers in question were + impregnated with their own pollen. + </p> + <p> + My experiments were tried in the following manner. A single plant, if it + produced a sufficiency of flowers, or two or three plants were placed + under a net stretched on a frame, and large enough to cover the plant + (together with the pot, when one was used) without touching it. This + latter point is important, for if the flowers touch the net they may be + cross-fertilised by bees, as I have known to happen; and when the net is + wet the pollen may be injured. I used at first “white cotton net,” with + very fine meshes, but afterwards a kind of net with meshes one-tenth of an + inch in diameter; and this I found by experience effectually excluded all + insects excepting Thrips, which no net will exclude. On the plants thus + protected several flowers were marked, and were fertilised with their own + pollen; and an equal number on the same plants, marked in a different + manner, were at the same time crossed with pollen from a distinct plant. + The crossed flowers were never castrated, in order to make the experiments + as like as possible to what occurs under nature with plants fertilised by + the aid of insects. Therefore, some of the flowers which were crossed may + have failed to be thus fertilised, and afterwards have been + self-fertilised. But this and some other sources of error will presently + be discussed. In some few cases of spontaneously self-fertile species, the + flowers were allowed to fertilise themselves under the net; and in still + fewer cases uncovered plants were allowed to be freely crossed by the + insects which incessantly visited them. There are some great advantages + and some disadvantages in my having occasionally varied my method of + proceeding; but when there was any difference in the treatment, it is + always so stated under the head of each species. + </p> + <p> + Care was taken that the seeds were thoroughly ripened before being + gathered. Afterwards the crossed and self-fertilised seeds were in most + cases placed on damp sand on opposite sides of a glass tumbler covered by + a glass plate, with a partition between the two lots; and the glass was + placed on the chimney-piece in a warm room. I could thus observe the + germination of the seeds. Sometimes a few would germinate on one side + before any on the other, and these were thrown away. But as often as a + pair germinated at the same time, they were planted on opposite sides of a + pot, with a superficial partition between the two; and I thus proceeded + until from half-a-dozen to a score or more seedlings of exactly the same + age were planted on the opposite sides of several pots. If one of the + young seedlings became sickly or was in any way injured, it was pulled up + and thrown away, as well as its antagonist on the opposite side of the + same pot. + </p> + <p> + As a large number of seeds were placed on the sand to germinate, many + remained after the pairs had been selected, some of which were in a state + of germination and others not so; and these were sown crowded together on + the opposite sides of one or two rather larger pots, or sometimes in two + long rows out of doors. In these cases there was the most severe struggle + for life among the crossed seedlings on one side of the pot, and the + self-fertilised seedlings on the other side, and between the two lots + which grew in competition in the same pot. A vast number soon perished, + and the tallest of the survivors on both sides when fully grown were + measured. Plants treated in this manner, were subjected to nearly the same + conditions as those growing in a state of nature, which have to struggle + to maturity in the midst of a host of competitors. + </p> + <p> + On other occasions, from the want of time, the seeds, instead of being + allowed to germinate on damp sand, were sown on the opposite sides of + pots, and the fully grown plants measured. But this plan is less accurate, + as the seeds sometimes germinated more quickly on one side than on the + other. It was however necessary to act in this manner with some few + species, as certain kinds of seeds would not germinate well when exposed + to the light; though the glasses containing them were kept on the + chimney-piece on one side of a room, and some way from the two windows + which faced the north-east. (1/7. This occurred in the plainest manner + with the seeds of Papaver vagum and Delphinium consolida, and less plainly + with those of Adonis aestivalis and Ononis minutissima. Rarely more than + one or two of the seeds of these four species germinated on the bare sand, + though left there for some weeks; but when these same seeds were placed on + earth in pots, and covered with a thin layer of sand, they germinated + immediately in large numbers.) + </p> + <p> + The soil in the pots in which the seedlings were planted, or the seeds + sown, was well mixed, so as to be uniform in composition. The plants on + the two sides were always watered at the same time and as equally as + possible; and even if this had not been done, the water would have spread + almost equally to both sides, as the pots were not large. The crossed and + self-fertilised plants were separated by a superficial partition, which + was always kept directed towards the chief source of the light, so that + the plants on both sides were equally illuminated. I do not believe it + possible that two sets of plants could have been subjected to more closely + similar conditions, than were my crossed and self-fertilised seedlings, as + grown in the above described manner. + </p> + <p> + In comparing the two sets, the eye alone was never trusted. Generally the + height of every plant on both sides was carefully measured, often more + than once, namely, whilst young, sometimes again when older, and finally + when fully or almost fully grown. But in some cases, which are always + specified, owing to the want of time, only one or two of the tallest + plants on each side were measured. This plan, which is not a good one, was + never followed (except with the crowded plants raised from the seeds + remaining after the pairs had been planted) unless the tallest plants on + each side seemed fairly to represent the average difference between those + on both sides. It has, however, some great advantages, as sickly or + accidentally injured plants, or the offspring of ill-ripened seeds, are + thus eliminated. When the tallest plants alone on each side were measured, + their average height of course exceeds that of all the plants on the same + side taken together. But in the case of the much crowded plants raised + from the remaining seeds, the average height of the tallest plants was + less than that of the plants in pairs, owing to the unfavourable + conditions to which they were subjected from being greatly crowded. For + our purpose, however, of the comparison of the crossed and self-fertilised + plants, their absolute height signifies little. + </p> + <p> + As the plants were measured by an ordinary English standard divided into + inches and eighths of an inch, I have not thought it worth while to change + the fractions into decimals. The average or mean heights were calculated + in the ordinary rough method by adding up the measurements of all, and + dividing the product by the number of plants measured; the result being + here given in inches and decimals. As the different species grow to + various heights, I have always for the sake of easy comparison given in + addition the average height of the crossed plants of each species taken as + 100, and have calculated the average height of the self-fertilised plant + in relation to this standard. With respect to the crowded plants raised + from the seeds remaining after the pairs had been planted, and of which + only some of the tallest on each side were measured, I have not thought it + worth while to complicate the results by giving separate averages for them + and for the pairs, but have added up all their heights, and thus obtained + a single average. + </p> + <p> + I long doubted whether it was worth while to give the measurements of each + separate plant, but have decided to do so, in order that it may be seen + that the superiority of the crossed plants over the self-fertilised, does + not commonly depend on the presence of two or three extra fine plants on + the one side, or of a few very poor plants on the other side. Although + several observers have insisted in general terms on the offspring from + intercrossed varieties being superior to either parent-form, no precise + measurements have been given (1/8. A summary of these statements, with + references, may be found in my ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under + Domestication’ chapter 17 2nd edition 1875 volume 2 page 109.); and I have + met with no observations on the effects of crossing and self-fertilising + the individuals of the same variety. Moreover, experiments of this kind + require so much time—mine having been continued during eleven years—that + they are not likely soon to be repeated. + </p> + <p> + As only a moderate number of crossed and self-fertilised plants were + measured, it was of great importance to me to learn how far the averages + were trustworthy. I therefore asked Mr. Galton, who has had much + experience in statistical researches, to examine some of my tables of + measurements, seven in number, namely, those of Ipomoea, Digitalis, Reseda + lutea, Viola, Limnanthes, Petunia, and Zea. I may premise that if we took + by chance a dozen or score of men belonging to two nations and measured + them, it would I presume be very rash to form any judgment from such small + numbers on their average heights. But the case is somewhat different with + my crossed and self-fertilised plants, as they were of exactly the same + age, were subjected from first to last to the same conditions, and were + descended from the same parents. When only from two to six pairs of plants + were measured, the results are manifestly of little or no value, except in + so far as they confirm and are confirmed by experiments made on a larger + scale with other species. I will now give the report on the seven tables + of measurements, which Mr. Galton has had the great kindness to draw up + for me. + </p> + <p> + [“I have examined the measurements of the plants with care, and by many + statistical methods, to find out how far the means of the several sets + represent constant realities, such as would come out the same so long as + the general conditions of growth remained unaltered. The principal methods + that were adopted are easily explained by selecting one of the shorter + series of plants, say of Zea mays, for an example.” + </p> + <p> + TABLE 1/1. Zea mays (young plants). (Mr. Galton.) + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed, as recorded by Mr. Darwin. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised, as recorded by Mr. Darwin. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Crossed, in Separate Pots, arranged in order of magnitude. + </p> + <p> + Column 5: Self-fertilised, in Separate Pots, arranged in order of + magnitude. + </p> + <p> + Column 6: Crossed, in a Single Series, arranged in order of magnitude. + </p> + <p> + Column 7: Self-fertilised, in a Single Series, arranged in order of + magnitude. + </p> + <p> + Column 8: Difference, in a Single Series, arranged in order of magnitude. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 23 4/8 : 17 3/8 :: 23 4/8 : 20 3/8 :: 23 4/8 : 20 3/8 : -3 1/8. + Pot 1 : 12 : 20 3/8 :: 21 : 20 :: 23 2/8 : 20 : -3 2/8. Pot 1 : 21 : 20 :: + 12 : 17 3/8 :: 23 : 20 : -3. Pot 1 : - : - :: - : - :: 22 1/8 : 18 5/8 : + -3 4/8. Pot 1 : 22 : 20 :: 22 : 20 :: 22 1/8 : 18 5/8 : -3 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 19 1/8 : 18 3/8 :: 21 4/8 : 18 5/8 :: 22 : 18 3/8 : -3 5/8. Pot 2 + : 21 4/8 : 18 5/8 :: 19 1/8 : 18 3/8 :: 21 5/8 : 18 : -3 5/8. Pot 2 : - : + - :: - : - :: 21 4/8 : 18 : -3 4/8. Pot 2 : 22 1/8 : 18 5/8 :: 23 2/8 : 18 + 5/8 :: 21 : 18 : -3. Pot 2 : 20 3/8 : 15 2/8 :: 22 1/8 : 18 :: 21 : 17 3/8 + : -3 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 18 2/8 : 16 4/8 :: 21 5/8 : 16 4/8 :: 20 3/8 : 16 4/8 : -3 7/8. + Pot 3 : 21 5/8 : 18 :: 20 3/8 : 16 2/8 :: 19 1/8 : 16 2/8 : -2 7/8. Pot 3 + : 23 2/8 : 16 2/8 :: 18 2/8 : 15 2/8 :: 18 2/8 : 15 4/8 : -2 6/8. Pot 3 : + - : - :: - : - :: 12 : 15 2/8 : +3 2/8. Pot 3 : 21 : 18 :: 23 : 18 :: 12 : + 12 6/8 : +0 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 22 1/8 : 12 6/8 :: 22 1/8 : 18. Pot 4 : 23 : 15 4/8 :: 21 : 15 + 4/8. Pot 4 : 12 : 18 :: 12 : 12 6/8. + </p> + <p> + “The observations as I received them are shown in Table 1/1, Columns 2 and + 3, where they certainly have no prima facie appearance of regularity. But + as soon as we arrange them the in order of their magnitudes, as in columns + 4 and 5, the case is materially altered. We now see, with few exceptions, + that the largest plant on the crossed side in each pot exceeds the largest + plant on the self-fertilised side, that the second exceeds the second, the + third the third, and so on. Out of the fifteen cases in the table, there + are only two exceptions to this rule. We may therefore confidently affirm + that a crossed series will always be found to exceed a self-fertilised + series, within the range of the conditions under which the present + experiment has been made.” + </p> + <h3> + TABLE 1/2. + </h3> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Difference. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 18 7/8 : 19 2/8 : +0 3/8. Pot 2 : 20 7/8 : 19 : -1 7/8. Pot 3 : 21 + 1/8 : 16 7/8 : -4 2/8. Pot 4 : 19 6/8 : 16 : -3 6/8. + </p> + <p> + “Next as regards the numerical estimate of this excess. The mean values of + the several groups are so discordant, as is shown in Table 1/2, that a + fairly precise numerical estimate seems impossible. But the consideration + arises, whether the difference between pot and pot may not be of much the + same order of importance as that of the other conditions upon which the + growth of the plants has been modified. If so, and only on that condition, + it would follow that when all the measurements, either of the crossed or + the self-fertilised plants, were combined into a single series, that + series would be statistically regular. The experiment is tried in Table + 1/1, columns 7 and 8, where the regularity is abundantly clear, and + justifies us in considering its mean as perfectly reliable. I have + protracted these measurements, and revised them in the usual way, by + drawing a curve through them with a free hand, but the revision barely + modifies the means derived from the original observations. In the present, + and in nearly all the other cases, the difference between the original and + revised means is under 2 per cent of their value. It is a very remarkable + coincidence that in the seven kinds of plants, whose measurements I have + examined, the ratio between the heights of the crossed and of the + self-fertilised ranges in five cases within very narrow limits. In Zea + mays it is as 100 to 84, and in the others it ranges between 100 to 76 and + 100 to 86.” + </p> + <p> + “The determination of the variability (measured by what is technically + called the ‘probable error’) is a problem of more delicacy than that of + determining the means, and I doubt, after making many trials, whether it + is possible to derive useful conclusions from these few observations. We + ought to have measurements of at least fifty plants in each case, in order + to be in a position to deduce fair results. One fact, however, bearing on + variability, is very evident in most cases, though not in Zea mays, + namely, that the self-fertilised plants include the larger number of + exceptionally small specimens, while the crossed are more generally full + grown.” + </p> + <p> + “Those groups of cases in which measurements have been made of a few of + the tallest plants that grew in rows, each of which contained a multitude + of plants, show very clearly that the crossed plants exceed the + self-fertilised in height, but they do not tell by inference anything + about their respective mean values. If it should happen that a series is + known to follow the law of error or any other law, and if the number of + individuals in the series is known, it would be always possible to + reconstruct the whole series when a fragment of it has been given. But I + find no such method to be applicable in the present case. The doubt as to + the number of plants in each row is of minor importance; the real + difficulty lies in our ignorance of the precise law followed by the + series. The experience of the plants in pots does not help us to determine + that law, because the observations of such plants are too few to enable us + to lay down more than the middle terms of the series to which they belong + with any sort of accuracy, whereas the cases we are now considering refer + to one of its extremities. There are other special difficulties which need + not be gone into, as the one already mentioned is a complete bar.”] + </p> + <p> + Mr. Galton sent me at the same time graphical representations which he had + made of the measurements, and they evidently form fairly regular curves. + He appends the words “very good” to those of Zea and Limnanthes. He also + calculated the average height of the crossed and self-fertilised plants in + the seven tables by a more correct method than that followed by me, + namely, by including the heights, as estimated in accordance with + statistical rules, of a few plants which died before they were measured; + whereas I merely added up the heights of the survivors, and divided the + sum by their number. The difference in our results is in one way highly + satisfactory, for the average heights of the self-fertilised plants, as + deduced by Mr. Galton, is less than mine in all the cases excepting one, + in which our averages are the same; and this shows that I have by no means + exaggerated the superiority of the crossed over the self-fertilised + plants. + </p> + <p> + After the heights of the crossed and self-fertilised plants had been + taken, they were sometimes cut down close to the ground, and an equal + number of both weighed. This method of comparison gives very striking + results, and I wish that it had been oftener followed. Finally a record + was often kept of any marked difference in the rate of germination of the + crossed and self-fertilised seeds,—of the relative periods of + flowering of the plants raised from them,—and of their + productiveness, that is, of the number of seed-capsules which they + produced and of the average number of seeds which each capsule contained. + </p> + <p> + When I began my experiments I did not intend to raise crossed and + self-fertilised plants for more than a single generation; but as soon as + the plants of the first generation were in flower I thought that I would + raise one more generation, and acted in the following manner. Several + flowers on one or more of the self-fertilised plants were again + self-fertilised; and several flowers on one or more of the crossed plants + were fertilised with pollen from another crossed plant of the same lot. + Having thus once begun, the same method was followed for as many as ten + successive generations with some of the species. The seeds and seedlings + were always treated in exactly the same manner as already described. The + self-fertilised plants, whether originally descended from one or two + mother-plants, were thus in each generation as closely interbred as was + possible; and I could not have improved on my plan. But instead of + crossing one of the crossed plants with another crossed plant, I ought to + have crossed the self-fertilised plants of each generation with pollen + taken from a non-related plant—that is, one belonging to a distinct + family or stock of the same species and variety. This was done in several + cases as an additional experiment, and gave very striking results. But the + plan usually followed was to put into competition and compare intercrossed + plants, which were almost always the offspring of more or less closely + related plants, with the self-fertilised plants of each succeeding + generation;—all having been grown under closely similar conditions. + I have, however, learnt more by this method of proceeding, which was begun + by an oversight and then necessarily followed, than if I had always + crossed the self-fertilised plants of each succeeding generation with + pollen from a fresh stock. + </p> + <p> + I have said that the crossed plants of the successive generations were + almost always inter-related. When the flowers on an hermaphrodite plant + are crossed with pollen taken from a distinct plant, the seedlings thus + raised may be considered as hermaphrodite brothers or sisters; those + raised from the same capsule being as close as twins or animals of the + same litter. But in one sense the flowers on the same plant are distinct + individuals, and as several flowers on the mother-plant were crossed by + pollen taken from several flowers on the father-plant, such seedlings + would be in one sense half-brothers or sisters, but more closely related + than are the half-brothers and sisters of ordinary animals. The flowers on + the mother-plant were, however, commonly crossed by pollen taken from two + or more distinct plants; and in these cases the seedlings might be called + with more truth half-brothers or sisters. When two or three mother-plants + were crossed, as often happened, by pollen taken from two or three + father-plants (the seeds being all intermingled), some of the seedlings of + the first generation would be in no way related, whilst many others would + be whole or half-brothers and sisters. In the second generation a large + number of the seedlings would be what may be called whole or half + first-cousins, mingled with whole and half-brothers and sisters, and with + some plants not at all related. So it would be in the succeeding + generations, but there would also be many cousins of the second and more + remote degrees. The relationship will thus have become more and more + inextricably complex in the later generations; with most of the plants in + some degree and many of them closely related. + </p> + <p> + I have only one other point to notice, but this is one of the highest + importance; namely, that the crossed and self-fertilised plants were + subjected in the same generation to as nearly similar and uniform + conditions as was possible. In the successive generations they were + exposed to slightly different conditions as the seasons varied, and they + were raised at different periods. But in other respects all were treated + alike, being grown in pots in the same artificially prepared soil, being + watered at the same time, and kept close together in the same greenhouse + or hothouse. They were therefore not exposed during successive years to + such great vicissitudes of climate as are plants growing out of doors. + </p> + <h3> + ON SOME APPARENT AND REAL CAUSES OF ERROR IN MY EXPERIMENTS. + </h3> + <p> + It has been objected to such experiments as mine, that covering plants + with a net, although only for a short time whilst in flower, may affect + their health and fertility. I have seen no such effect except in one + instance with a Myosotis, and the covering may not then have been the real + cause of injury. But even if the net were slightly injurious, and + certainly it was not so in any high degree, as I could judge by the + appearance of the plants and by comparing their fertility with that of + neighbouring uncovered plants, it would not have vitiated my experiments; + for in all the more important cases the flowers were crossed as well as + self-fertilised under a net, so that they were treated in this respect + exactly alike. + </p> + <p> + As it is impossible to exclude such minute pollen-carrying insects as + Thrips, flowers which it was intended to fertilise with their own pollen + may sometimes have been afterwards crossed with pollen brought by these + insects from another flower on the same plant; but as we shall hereafter + see, a cross of this kind does not produce any effect, or at most only a + slight one. When two or more plants were placed near one another under the + same net, as was often done, there is some real though not great danger of + the flowers which were believed to be self-fertilised being afterwards + crossed with pollen brought by Thrips from a distinct plant. I have said + that the danger is not great because I have often found that plants which + are self-sterile, unless aided by insects, remained sterile when several + plants of the same species were placed under the same net. If, however, + the flowers which had been presumably self-fertilised by me were in any + case afterwards crossed by Thrips with pollen brought from a distinct + plant, crossed seedlings would have been included amongst the + self-fertilised; but it should be especially observed that this occurrence + would tend to diminish and not to increase any superiority in average + height, fertility, etc., of the crossed over the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + As the flowers which were crossed were never castrated, it is probable or + even almost certain that I sometimes failed to cross-fertilise them + effectually, and that they were afterwards spontaneously self-fertilised. + This would have been most likely to occur with dichogamous species, for + without much care it is not easy to perceive whether their stigmas are + ready to be fertilised when the anthers open. But in all cases, as the + flowers were protected from wind, rain, and the access of insects, any + pollen placed by me on the stigmatic surface whilst it was immature, would + generally have remained there until the stigma was mature; and the flowers + would then have been crossed as was intended. Nevertheless, it is highly + probable that self-fertilised seedlings have sometimes by this means got + included amongst the crossed seedlings. The effect would be, as in the + former case, not to exaggerate but to diminish any average superiority of + the crossed over the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + Errors arising from the two causes just named, and from others,—such + as some of the seeds not having been thoroughly ripened, though care was + taken to avoid this error—the sickness or unperceived injury of any + of the plants,—will have been to a large extent eliminated, in those + cases in which many crossed and self-fertilised plants were measured and + an average struck. Some of these causes of error will also have been + eliminated by the seeds having been allowed to germinate on bare damp + sand, and being planted in pairs; for it is not likely that ill-matured + and well-matured, or diseased and healthy seeds, would germinate at + exactly the same time. The same result will have been gained in the + several cases in which only a few of the tallest, finest, and healthiest + plants on each side of the pots were measured. + </p> + <p> + Kolreuter and Gartner have proved that with some plants several, even as + many as from fifty to sixty, pollen-grains are necessary for the + fertilisation of all the ovules in the ovarium. (1/9. ‘Kentniss der + Befruchtung’ 1844 page 345. Naudin ‘Nouvelles Archives du Museum’ tome 1 + page 27.) Naudin also found in the case of Mirabilis that if only one or + two of its very large pollen-grains were placed on the stigma, the plants + raised from such seeds were dwarfed. I was therefore careful to give an + amply sufficient supply of pollen, and generally covered the stigma with + it; but I did not take any special pains to place exactly the same amount + on the stigmas of the self-fertilised and crossed flowers. After having + acted in this manner during two seasons, I remembered that Gartner + thought, though without any direct evidence, that an excess of pollen was + perhaps injurious; and it has been proved by Spallanzani, Quatrefages, and + Newport, that with various animals an excess of the seminal fluid entirely + prevents fertilisation. (1/10. ‘Transactions of the Philosophical Society’ + 1853 pages 253-258.) It was therefore necessary to ascertain whether the + fertility of the flowers was affected by applying a rather small and an + extremely large quantity of pollen to the stigma. Accordingly a very small + mass of pollen-grains was placed on one side of the large stigma in + sixty-four flowers of Ipomoea purpurea, and a great mass of pollen over + the whole surface of the stigma in sixty-four other flowers. In order to + vary the experiment, half the flowers of both lots were on plants produced + from self-fertilised seeds, and the other half on plants from crossed + seeds. The sixty-four flowers with an excess of pollen yielded sixty-one + capsules; and excluding four capsules, each of which contained only a + single poor seed, the remainder contained on an average 5.07 seeds per + capsule. The sixty-four flowers with only a little pollen placed on one + side of the stigma yielded sixty-three capsules, and excluding one from + the same cause as before, the remainder contained on an average 5.129 + seeds. So that the flowers fertilised with little pollen yielded rather + more capsules and seeds than did those fertilised with an excess; but the + difference is too slight to be of any significance. On the other hand, the + seeds produced by the flowers with an excess of pollen were a little + heavier of the two; for 170 of them weighed 79.67 grains, whilst 170 seeds + from the flowers with very little pollen weighed 79.20 grains. Both lots + of seeds having been placed on damp sand presented no difference in their + rate of germination. We may therefore conclude that my experiments were + not affected by any slight difference in the amount of pollen used; a + sufficiency having been employed in all cases. + </p> + <p> + The order in which our subject will be treated in the present volume is as + follows. A long series of experiments will first be given in Chapters 2 to + 6. Tables will afterwards be appended, showing in a condensed form the + relative heights, weights, and fertility of the offspring of the various + crossed and self-fertilised species. Another table exhibits the striking + results from fertilising plants, which during several generations had + either been self-fertilised or had been crossed with plants kept all the + time under closely similar conditions, with pollen taken from plants of a + distinct stock and which had been exposed to different conditions. In the + concluding chapters various related points and questions of general + interest will be discussed. + </p> + <p> + Anyone not specially interested in the subject need not attempt to read + all the details (though they possess, I think, some value, and cannot be + all summarised. But I would suggest to the reader to take as an example + the experiments on Ipomoea in Chapter 2; to which may be added those on + Digitalis, Origanum, Viola, or the common cabbage, as in all these cases + the crossed plants are superior to the self-fertilised in a marked degree, + but not in quite the same manner. As instances of self-fertilised plants + being equal or superior to the crossed, the experiments on Bartonia, + Canna, and the common pea ought to be read; but in the last case, and + probably in that of Canna, the want of any superiority in the crossed + plants can be explained. + </p> + <p> + Species were selected for experiment belonging to widely distinct + families, inhabiting various countries. In some few cases several genera + belonging to the same family were tried, and these are grouped together; + but the families themselves have been arranged not in any natural order, + but in that which was the most convenient for my purpose. The experiments + have been fully given, as the results appear to me of sufficient value to + justify the details. Plants bearing hermaphrodite flowers can be interbred + more closely than is possible with bisexual animals, and are therefore + well-fitted to throw light on the nature and extent of the good effects of + crossing, and on the evil effects of close interbreeding or + self-fertilisation. The most important conclusion at which I have arrived + is that the mere act of crossing by itself does no good. The good depends + on the individuals which are crossed differing slightly in constitution, + owing to their progenitors having been subjected during several + generations to slightly different conditions, or to what we call in our + ignorance spontaneous variation. This conclusion, as we shall hereafter + see, is closely connected with various important physiological problems, + such as the benefit derived from slight changes in the conditions of life, + and this stands in the closest connection with life itself. It throws + light on the origin of the two sexes and on their separation or union in + the same individual, and lastly on the whole subject of hybridism, which + is one of the greatest obstacles to the general acceptance and progress of + the great principle of evolution. + </p> + <p> + In order to avoid misapprehension, I beg leave to repeat that throughout + this volume a crossed plant, seedling, or seed, means one of crossed + PARENTAGE, that is, one derived from a flower fertilised with pollen from + a distinct plant of the same species. And that a self-fertilised plant, + seedling, or seed, means one of self-fertilised PARENTAGE, that is, one + derived from a flower fertilised with pollen from the same flower, or + sometimes, when thus stated, from another flower on the same plant. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0002" id="link2HCH0002"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER II. CONVOLVULACEAE. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Ipomoea purpurea, comparison of the height and fertility of the crossed + and self-fertilised plants during ten successive generations. + Greater constitutional vigour of the crossed plants. + The effects on the offspring of crossing different flowers on the same + plant, instead of crossing distinct individuals. + The effects of a cross with a fresh stock. + The descendants of the self-fertilised plant named Hero. + Summary on the growth, vigour, and fertility of the successive crossed + and self-fertilised generations. + Small amount of pollen in the anthers of the self-fertilised plants of + the later generations, and the sterility of their first-produced + flowers. + Uniform colour of the flowers produced by the self-fertilised plants. + The advantage from a cross between two distinct plants depends on their + differing in constitution. +</pre> + <p> + A plant of Ipomoea purpurea, or as it is often called in England the + convolvulus major, a native of South America, grew in my greenhouse. Ten + flowers on this plant were fertilised with pollen from the same flower; + and ten other flowers on the same plant were crossed with pollen from a + distinct plant. The fertilisation of the flowers with their own pollen was + superfluous, as this convolvulus is highly self-fertile; but I acted in + this manner to make the experiments correspond in all respects. Whilst the + flowers are young the stigma projects beyond the anthers; and it might + have been thought that it could not be fertilised without the aid of + humble-bees, which often visit the flowers; but as the flower grows older + the stamens increase in length, and their anthers brush against the + stigma, which thus receives some pollen. The number of seeds produced by + the crossed and self-fertilised flowers differed very little. + </p> + <p> + [Crossed and self-fertilised seeds obtained in the above manner were + allowed to germinate on damp sand, and as often as pairs germinated at the + same time they were planted in the manner described in the Introduction + (Chapter 1), on the opposite sides of two pots. Five pairs were thus + planted; and all the remaining seeds, whether or not in a state of + germination, were planted on the opposite sides of a third pot, so that + the young plants on both sides were here greatly crowded and exposed to + very severe competition. Rods of iron or wood of equal diameter were given + to all the plants to twine up; and as soon as one of each pair reached the + summit both were measured. A single rod was placed on each side of the + crowded pot, Number 3, and only the tallest plant on each side was + measured. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/1. Ipomoea purpurea (First Generation.). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Seedlings from Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Seedlings from Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 87 4/8 : 69. Pot 1 : 87 4/8 : 66. Pot 1 : 89 : 73. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 88 : 68 4/8. Pot 2 : 87 : 60 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 77 : 57. Plants crowded; the tallest one measured on each side. + </p> + <p> + Total : 516 : 394. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the six crossed plants is here 86 inches, whilst + that of the six self-fertilised plants is only 65.66 inches, so that the + crossed plants are to the self-fertilised in height as 100 to 76. It + should be observed that this difference is not due to a few of the crossed + plants being extremely tall, or to a few of the self-fertilised being + extremely short, but to all the crossed plants attaining a greater height + than their antagonists. The three pairs in Pot 1 were measured at two + earlier periods, and the difference was sometimes greater and sometimes + less than that at the final measuring. But it is an interesting fact, of + which I have seen several other instances, that one of the self-fertilised + plants, when nearly a foot in height, was half an inch taller than the + crossed plant; and again, when two feet high, it was 1 3/8 of an inch + taller, but during the ten subsequent days the crossed plant began to gain + on its antagonist, and ever afterward asserted its supremacy, until it + exceeded its self-fertilised opponent by 16 inches. + </p> + <p> + The five crossed plants in Pots 1 and 2 were covered with a net, and + produced 121 capsules; the five self-fertilised plants produced + eighty-four capsules, so that the numbers of capsules were as 100 to 69. + Of the 121 capsules on the crossed plants sixty-five were the product of + flowers crossed with pollen from a distinct plant, and these contained on + an average 5.23 seeds per capsule; the remaining fifty-six capsules were + spontaneously self-fertilised. Of the eighty-four capsules on the + self-fertilised plants, all the product of renewed self-fertilisation, + fifty-five (which were alone examined) contained on an average 4.85 seeds + per capsule. Therefore the cross-fertilised capsules, compared with the + self-fertilised capsules, yielded seeds in the proportion of 100 to 93. + The crossed seeds were relatively heavier than the self-fertilised seeds. + Combining the above data (i.e., number of capsules and average number of + contained seeds), the crossed plants, compared with the self-fertilised, + yielded seeds in the ratio of 100 to 64. + </p> + <p> + These crossed plants produced, as already stated, fifty-six spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules, and the self-fertilised plants produced + twenty-nine such capsules. The former contained on an average, in + comparison with the latter, seeds in the proportion of 100 to 99. + </p> + <p> + In Pot 3, on the opposite sides of which a large number of crossed and + self-fertilised seeds had been sown and the seedlings allowed to struggle + together, the crossed plants had at first no great advantage. At one time + the tallest crossed was 25 1/8 inches high, and the tallest + self-fertilised plants 21 3/8. But the difference afterwards became much + greater. The plants on both sides, from being so crowded, were poor + specimens. The flowers were allowed to fertilise themselves spontaneously + under a net; the crossed plants produced thirty-seven capsules, the + self-fertilised plants only eighteen, or as 100 to 47. The former + contained on an average 3.62 seeds per capsule; and the latter 3.38 seeds, + or as 100 to 93. Combining these data (i.e., number of capsules and + average number of seeds), the crowded crossed plants produced seeds + compared with the self-fertilised as 100 to 45. These latter seeds, + however, were decidedly heavier, a hundred weighing 41.64 grains, than + those from the capsules on the crossed plants, of which a hundred weighed + 36.79 grains; and this probably was due to the fewer capsules borne by the + self-fertilised plants having been better nourished. We thus see that the + crossed plants in this the first generation, when grown under favourable + conditions, and when grown under unfavourable conditions from being much + crowded, greatly exceeded in height, and in the number of capsules + produced, and slightly in the number of seeds per capsule, the + self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Flowers on the crossed plants of the last generation (Table 2/1) were + crossed by pollen from distinct plants of the same generation; and flowers + on the self-fertilised plants were fertilised by pollen from the same + flower. The seeds thus produced were treated in every respect as before, + and we have in Table 2/2 the result. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/2. Ipomoea purpurea (Second Generation.). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 87 : 67 4/8. Pot 1 : 83 : 68 4/8. Pot 1 : 83 : 80 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 85 4/8 : 61 4/8. Pot 2 : 89 : 79. Pot 2 : 77 4/8 : 41. + </p> + <p> + Total : 505 : 398. + </p> + <p> + Here again every single crossed plant is taller than its antagonist. The + self-fertilised plant in Pot 1, which ultimately reached the unusual + height of 80 4/8 inches, was for a long time taller than the opposed + crossed plant, though at last beaten by it. The average height of the six + crossed plants is 84.16 inches, whilst that of the six self-fertilised + plants is 66.33 inches, or as 100 to 79. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE THIRD GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Seeds from the crossed plants of the last generation (Table 2/2) again + crossed, and from the self-fertilised plants again self-fertilised, were + treated in all respects exactly as before, with the following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/3. Ipomoea purpurea (Third Generation.). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 74 : 56 4/8. Pot 1 : 72 : 51 4/8. Pot 1 : 73 4/8 : 54. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 82 : 59. Pot 2 : 81 : 30. Pot 2 : 82 : 66. + </p> + <p> + Total : 464.5 : 317. + </p> + <p> + Again all the crossed plants are higher than their antagonists: their + average height is 77.41 inches, whereas that of the self-fertilised is + 52.83 inches, or as 100 to 68. + </p> + <p> + I attended closely to the fertility of the plants of this third + generation. Thirty flowers on the crossed plants were crossed with pollen + from other crossed plants of the same generation, and the twenty-six + capsules thus produced contained, on an average, 4.73 seeds; whilst thirty + flowers on the self-fertilised plants, fertilised with the pollen from the + same flower, produced twenty-three capsules, each containing 4.43 seeds. + Thus the average number of seeds in the crossed capsules was to that in + the self-fertilised capsules as 100 to 94. A hundred of the crossed seeds + weighed 43.27 grains, whilst a hundred of the self-fertilised seeds + weighed only 37.63 grains. Many of these lighter self-fertilised seeds + placed on damp sand germinated before the crossed; thus thirty-six of the + former germinated whilst only thirteen of the latter or crossed seeds + germinated. In Pot 1 the three crossed plants produced spontaneously under + the net (besides the twenty-six artificially cross-fertilised capsules) + seventy-seven self-fertilised capsules containing on an average 4.41 + seeds; whilst the three self-fertilised plants produced spontaneously + (besides the twenty-three artificially self-fertilised capsules) only + twenty-nine self-fertilised capsules, containing on an average 4.14 seeds. + Therefore the average number of seeds in the two lots of spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules was as 100 to 94. Taking into consideration the + number of capsules together with the average number of seeds, the crossed + plants (spontaneously self-fertilised) produced seeds in comparison with + the self-fertilised plants (spontaneously self-fertilised) in the + proportion of 100 to 35. By whatever method the fertility of these plants + is compared, the crossed are more fertile than the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + I tried in several ways the comparative vigour and powers of growth of the + crossed and self-fertilised plants of this third generation. Thus, four + self-fertilised seeds which had just germinated were planted on one side + of a pot, and after an interval of forty-eight hours, four crossed seeds + in the same state of germination were planted on the opposite side; and + the pot was kept in the hothouse. I thought that the advantage thus given + to the self-fertilised seedlings would have been so great that they would + never have been beaten by the crossed ones. They were not beaten until all + had grown to a height of 18 inches; and the degree to which they were + finally beaten is shown in Table 2/4. We here see that the average height + of the four crossed plants is 76.62, and of the four self-fertilised + plants 65.87 inches, or as 100 to 86; therefore less than when both sides + started fair. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/4. Ipomoea purpurea (Third Generation, the self-fertilised plants + having had a start of forty-eight hours). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 78 4/8 : 73 4/8. Pot 3 : 77 4/8 : 53. Pot 3 : 73 : 61 4/8. Pot 3 : + 77 4/8 : 75 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 306.5 : 263.5. + </p> + <p> + Crossed and self-fertilised seeds of the third generation were also sown + out of doors late in the summer, and therefore under unfavourable + conditions, and a single stick was given to each lot of plants to twine + up. The two lots were sufficiently separate so as not to interfere with + each other’s growth, and the ground was clear of weeds. As soon as they + were killed by the first frost (and there was no difference in their + hardiness), the two tallest crossed plants were found to be 24.5 and 22.5 + inches, whilst the two tallest self-fertilised plants were only 15 and + 12.5 inches in height, or as 100 to 59. + </p> + <p> + I likewise sowed at the same time two lots of the same seeds in a part of + the garden which was shady and covered with weeds. The crossed seedlings + from the first looked the most healthy, but they twined up a stick only to + a height of 7 1/4 inches; whilst the self-fertilised were not able to + twine at all; and the tallest of them was only 3 1/2 inches in height. + </p> + <p> + Lastly, two lots of the same seeds were sown in the midst of a bed of + candy-tuft (Iberis) growing vigorously. The seedlings came up, but all the + self-fertilised ones soon died excepting one, which never twined and grew + to a height of only 4 inches. Many of the crossed seedlings, on the other + hand, survived; and some twined up the stems of the Iberis to the height + of 11 inches. These cases prove that the crossed seedlings have an immense + advantage over the self-fertilised, both when growing isolated under very + unfavourable conditions, and when put into competition with each other or + with other plants, as would happen in a state of nature. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FOURTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Seedlings raised as before from the crossed and self-fertilised plants of + the third generation in Table 2/3, gave results as follows:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/5. Ipomoea purpurea (Fourth Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 84 : 80. Pot 1 : 47 : 44 1/2. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 83 : 73 1/2. Pot 2 : 59 : 51 1/2. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 82 : 56 1/2. Pot 3 : 65 1/2 : 63. Pot 3 : 68 : 52. + </p> + <p> + Total : 488.5 : 421.0. + </p> + <p> + Here the average height of the seven crossed plants is 69.78 inches, and + that of the seven self-fertilised plants 60.14; or as 100 to 86. This + smaller difference relatively to that in the former generations, may be + attributed to the plants having been raised during the depth of winter, + and consequently to their not having grown vigorously, as was shown by + their general appearance and from several of them never reaching the + summits of the rods. In Pot 2, one of the self-fertilised plants was for a + long time taller by two inches than its opponent, but was ultimately + beaten by it, so that all the crossed plants exceeded their opponents in + height. Of twenty-eight capsules produced by the crossed plants fertilised + by pollen from a distinct plant, each contained on an average 4.75 seeds; + of twenty-seven self-fertilised capsules on the self-fertilised plants, + each contained on an average 4.47 seeds; so that the proportion of seeds + in the crossed and self-fertilised capsules was as 100 to 94. + </p> + <p> + Some of the same seeds, from which the plants in Table 2/5 had been + raised, were planted, after they had germinated on damp sand, in a square + tub, in which a large Brugmansia had long been growing. The soil was + extremely poor and full of roots; six crossed seeds were planted in one + corner, and six self-fertilised seeds in the opposite corner. All the + seedlings from the latter soon died excepting one, and this grew to the + height of only 1 1/2 inches. Of the crossed plants three survived, and + they grew to the height of 2 1/2 inches, but were not able to twine round + a stick; nevertheless, to my surprise, they produced some small miserable + flowers. The crossed plants thus had a decided advantage over the + self-fertilised plants under this extremity of bad conditions. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FIFTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + These were raised in the same manner as before, and when measured gave the + following results:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/6. Ipomoea purpurea (Fifth Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 96 : 73. Pot 1 : 86 : 78. Pot 1 : 69 : 29. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 84 : 51. Pot 2 : 84 : 84. Pot 2 : 76 1/4 : 59. + </p> + <p> + Total : 495.25 : 374.00. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the six crossed plants is 82.54 inches, and that of + the six self-fertilised plants 62.33 inches, or as 100 to 75. Every + crossed plant exceeded its antagonist in height. In Pot 1 the middle plant + on the crossed side was slightly injured whilst young by a blow, and was + for a time beaten by its opponent, but ultimately recovered the usual + superiority. The crossed plants produced spontaneously a vast number more + capsules than did the self-fertilised plants; and the capsules of the + former contained on an average 3.37 seeds, whilst those of the latter + contained only 3.0 per capsule, or as 100 to 89. But looking only to the + artificially fertilised capsules, those on the crossed plants again + crossed contained on an average 4.46 seeds, whilst those on the + self-fertilised plants again self-fertilised contained 4.77 seeds; so that + the self-fertilised capsules were the more fertile of the two, and of this + unusual fact I can offer no explanation. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SIXTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + These were raised in the usual manner, with the following result. I should + state that there were originally eight plants on each side; but as two of + the self-fertilised became extremely unhealthy and never grew to near + their full height, these as well as their opponents have been struck out + of the list. If they had been retained, they would have made the average + height of the crossed plants unfairly greater than that of the + self-fertilised. I have acted in the same manner in a few other instances, + when one of a pair plainly became very unhealthy. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/7. Ipomoea purpurea (Sixth Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 93 : 50 1/2. Pot 1 : 91 : 65. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 79 : 50. Pot 2 : 86 1/2 : 87. Pot 2 : 88 : 62. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 87 1/2 : 64 1/2. + </p> + <p> + Total : 525 : 379. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the six crossed plants is here 87.5, and of the six + self-fertilised plants 63.16, or as 100 to 72. This large difference was + chiefly due to most of the plants, especially the self-fertilised ones, + having become unhealthy towards the close of their growth, and they were + severely attacked by aphides. From this cause nothing can be inferred with + respect to their relative fertility. In this generation we have the first + instance of a self-fertilised plant in Pot 2 exceeding (though only by + half an inch) its crossed opponent. This victory was fairly won after a + long struggle. At first the self-fertilised plant was several inches + taller than its opponent, but when the latter was 4 1/2 feet high it had + grown equal; it then grew a little taller than the self-fertilised plant, + but was ultimately beaten by it to the extent of half an inch, as shown in + Table 2/7. I was so much surprised at this case that I saved the + self-fertilised seeds of this plant, which I will call the “Hero,” and + experimented on its descendants, as will hereafter be described. + </p> + <p> + Besides the plants included in Table 2/7, nine crossed and nine + self-fertilised plants of the same lot were raised in two other pots, 4 + and 5. These pots had been kept in the hothouse, but from want of room + were, whilst the plants were young, suddenly moved during very cold + weather into the coldest part of the greenhouse. They all suffered + greatly, and never quite recovered. After a fortnight only two of the nine + self-fertilised seedlings were alive, whilst seven of the crossed + survived. The tallest of these latter plants when measured was 47 inches + in height, whilst the tallest of the two surviving self-fertilised plants + was only 32 inches. Here again we see how much more vigorous the crossed + plants are than the self-fertilised. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SEVENTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + These were raised as heretofore with the following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/8. Ipomoea purpurea (Seventh Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 84 4/8 : 74 6/8. Pot 1 : 84 6/8 : 84. Pot 1 : 76 2/8 : 55 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 84 4/8 : 65. Pot 2 : 90 : 51 2/8. Pot 2 : 82 2/8 : 80 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 83 : 67 6/8. Pot 3 : 86 : 60 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 84 2/8 : 75 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 755.50 : 614.25. + </p> + <p> + Each of these nine crossed plants is higher than its opponent, though in + one case only by three-quarters of an inch. Their average height is 83.94 + inches, and that of the self-fertilised plants 68.25, or as 100 to 81. + These plants, after growing to their full height, became very unhealthy + and infested with aphides, just when the seeds were setting, so that many + of the capsules failed, and nothing can be said on their relative + fertility. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE EIGHTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + As just stated, the plants of the last generation, from which the present + ones were raised, were very unhealthy and their seeds of unusually small + size; and this probably accounts for the two lots behaving differently to + what they did in any of the previous or succeeding generations. Many of + the self-fertilised seeds germinated before the crossed ones, and these + were of course rejected. When the crossed seedlings in Table 2/9 had grown + to a height of between 1 and 2 feet, they were all, or almost all, shorter + than their self-fertilised opponents, but were not then measured. When + they had acquired an average height of 32.28 inches, that of the + self-fertilised plants was 40.68, or as 100 to 122. Moreover, every one of + the self-fertilised plants, with a single exception, exceeded its crossed + opponent. When, however, the crossed plants had grown to an average height + of 77.56 inches, they just exceeded (namely, by .7 of an inch) the average + height of the self-fertilised plants; but two of the latter were still + taller than their crossed opponents. I was so much astonished at this + whole case, that I tied string to the summits of the rods; the plants + being thus allowed to continue climbing upwards. When their growth was + complete they were untwined, stretched straight, and measured. The crossed + plants had now almost regained their accustomed superiority, as may be + seen in Table 2/9. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the eight crossed plants is here 113.25 inches, and + that of the self-fertilised plants 96.65, or as 100 to 85. Nevertheless + two of the self-fertilised plants, as may be seen in Table 2/9, were still + higher than their crossed opponents. The latter manifestly had much + thicker stems and many more lateral branches, and looked altogether more + vigorous than the self-fertilised plants, and generally flowered before + them. The earlier flowers produced by these self-fertilised plants did not + set any capsules, and their anthers contained only a small amount of + pollen; but to this subject I shall return. Nevertheless capsules produced + by two other self-fertilised plants of the same lot, not included in Table + 2/9, which had been highly favoured by being grown in separate pots, + contained the large average number of 5.1 seeds per capsule. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/9. Ipomoea purpurea (Eighth Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 111 6/8 : 96. Pot 1 : 127 : 54. Pot 1 : 130 6/8 : 93 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 97 2/8 : 94. Pot 2 : 89 4/8 : 125 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 103 6/8 : 115 4/8. Pot 3 : 100 6/8 : 84 6/8. Pot 3 : 147 4/8 : 109 + 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 908.25 : 773.25. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE NINTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + The plants of this generation were raised in the same manner as before, + with the result shown in Table 2/10. + </p> + <p> + The fourteen crossed plants average in height 81.39 inches and the + fourteen self-fertilised plants 64.07, or as 100 to 79. One + self-fertilised plant in Pot 3 exceeded, and one in Pot 4 equalled in + height, its opponent. The self-fertilised plants showed no sign of + inheriting the precocious growth of their parents; this having been due, + as it would appear, to the abnormal state of the seeds from the + unhealthiness of their parents. The fourteen self-fertilised plants + yielded only forty spontaneously self-fertilised capsules, to which must + be added seven, the product of ten flowers artificially self-fertilised. + On the other hand, the fourteen crossed plants yielded 152 spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules; but thirty-six flowers on these plants were + crossed (yielding thirty-three capsules), and these flowers would probably + have produced about thirty spontaneously self-fertilised capsules. + Therefore an equal number of the crossed and self-fertilised plants would + have produced capsules in the proportion of about 182 to 47, or as 100 to + 26. Another phenomenon was well pronounced in this generation, but I + believe had occurred previously to a slight extent; namely, that most of + the flowers on the self-fertilised plants were somewhat monstrous. The + monstrosity consisted in the corolla being irregularly split so that it + did not open properly, with one or two of the stamens slightly foliaceous, + coloured, and firmly coherent to the corolla. I observed this monstrosity + in only one flower on the crossed plants. The self-fertilised plants, if + well nourished, would almost certainly, in a few more generations, have + produced double flowers, for they had already become in some degree + sterile. (2/1. See on this subject ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under + Domestication’ chapter 18 2nd edition volume 2 page 152.) + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/10. Ipomoea purpurea (Ninth Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 83 4/8 : 57. Pot 1 : 85 4/8 : 71. Pot 1 : 83 4/8 : 48 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 83 2/8 : 45. Pot 2 : 64 2/8 : 43 6/8. Pot 2 : 64 3/8 : 38 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 79 : 63. Pot 3 : 88 1/8 : 71. Pot 3 : 61 : 89 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 82 4/8 : 82 4/8. Pot 4 : 90 : 76 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 89 4/8 : 67. Pot 5 : 92 4/8 : 74 2/8. Pot 5 : 92 4/8 : 70. Crowded + plants. + </p> + <p> + Total : 1139.5 : 897.0. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE TENTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Six plants were raised in the usual manner from the crossed plants of the + last generation (Table 2/10) again intercrossed, and from the + self-fertilised again self-fertilised. As one of the crossed plants in Pot + 1 in Table 2/11 became much diseased, having crumpled leaves, and + producing hardly any capsules, it and its opponent have been struck out of + the table. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/11. Ipomoea purpurea (Tenth Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 92 3/8 : 47 2/8. Pot 1 : 94 4/8 : 34 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 87 : 54 4/8. Pot 2 : 89 5/8 : 49 2/8. Pot 2 : 105 : 66 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 468.5 : 252.0. + </p> + <p> + The five crossed plants average 93.7 inches, and the five self-fertilised + only 50.4, or as 100 to 54. This difference, however, is so great that it + must be looked at as in part accidental. The six crossed plants (the + diseased one here included) yielded spontaneously 101 capsules, and the + six self-fertilised plants 88, the latter being chiefly produced by one of + the plants. But as the diseased plant, which yielded hardly any seed, is + here included, the ratio of 101 to 88 does not fairly give the relative + fertility of the two lots. The stems of the six crossed plants looked so + much finer than those of the six self-fertilised plants, that after the + capsules had been gathered and most of the leaves had fallen off, they + were weighed. Those of the crossed plants weighed 2,693 grains, whilst + those of the self-fertilised plants weighed only 1,173 grains, or as 100 + to 44; but as the diseased and dwarfed crossed plant is here included, the + superiority of the former in weight was really greater.] + </p> + <p> + THE EFFECTS ON THE OFFSPRING OF CROSSING DIFFERENT FLOWERS ON THE SAME + PLANT, INSTEAD OF CROSSING DISTINCT INDIVIDUALS. + </p> + <p> + In all the foregoing experiments, seedlings from flowers crossed by pollen + from a distinct plant (though in the later generations more or less + closely related) were put into competition with, and almost invariably + proved markedly superior in height to the offspring from self-fertilised + flowers. I wished, therefore, to ascertain whether a cross between two + flowers on the same plant would give to the offspring any superiority over + the offspring from flowers fertilised with their own pollen. I procured + some fresh seed and raised two plants, which were covered with a net; and + several of their flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct flower + on the same plant. Twenty-nine capsules thus produced contained on an + average 4.86 seeds per capsule; and 100 of these seeds weighed 36.77 + grains. Several other flowers were fertilised with their own pollen, and + twenty-six capsules thus produced contained on an average 4.42 seeds per + capsule; 100 of which weighed 42.61 grains. So that a cross of this kind + appears to have increased slightly the number of seeds per capsule, in the + ratio of 100 to 91; but these crossed seeds were lighter than the + self-fertilised in the ratio of 86 to 100. I doubt, however, from other + observations, whether these results are fully trustworthy. The two lots of + seeds, after germinating on sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite + sides of nine pots, and were treated in every respect like the plants in + the previous experiments. The remaining seeds, some in a state of + germination and some not so, were sown on the opposite sides of a large + pot (Number 10); and the four tallest plants on each side of this pot were + measured. The result is shown in Table 2/12. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/12. Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 82 : 77 4/8. Pot 1 : 75 : 87. Pot 1 : 65 : 64. Pot 1 : 76 : 87 + 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 78 4/8 : 84. Pot 2 : 43 : 86 4/8. Pot 2 : 65 4/8 : 90 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 61 2/8 : 86. Pot 3 : 85 : 69 4/8. Pot 3 : 89 : 87 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 83 : 80 4/8. Pot 4 : 73 4/8 : 88 4/8. Pot 4 : 67 : 84 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 78 : 66 4/8. Pot 5 : 76 6/8 : 77 4/8. Pot 5 : 57 : 81 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 70 4/8 : 80. Pot 6 : 79 : 82 4/8. Pot 6 : 79 6/8 : 55 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 76 : 77. Pot 7 : 84 4/8 : 83 4/8. Pot 7 : 79 : 73 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 73 : 76 4/8. Pot 8 : 67 : 82. Pot 8 : 83 : 80 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 9 : 73 2/8 : 78 4/8. Pot 9 : 78 : 67 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 10 : 34 : 82 4/8. Pot 10 : 82 : 36 6/8. Pot 10 : 84 6/8 : 69 4/8. Pot + 10 : 71 : 75 2/8. Crowded plants. + </p> + <p> + Total : 2270.25 : 2399.75. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the thirty-one crossed plants is 73.23 inches, and + that of the thirty-one self-fertilised plants 77.41 inches; or as 100 to + 106. Looking to each pair, it may be seen that only thirteen of the + crossed plants, whilst eighteen of the self-fertilised plants exceed their + opponents. A record was kept with respect to the plant which flowered + first in each pot; and only two of the crossed flowered before one of the + self-fertilised in the same pot; whilst eight of the self-fertilised + flowered first. It thus appears that the crossed plants are slightly + inferior in height and in earliness of flowering to the self-fertilised. + But the inferiority in height is so small, namely as 100 to 106, that I + should have felt very doubtful on this head, had I not cut down all the + plants (except those in the crowded pot Number 10) close to the ground and + weighed them. The twenty-seven crossed plants weighed 16 1/2 ounces, and + the twenty-seven self-fertilised plants 20 1/2 ounces; and this gives a + ratio of 100 to 124. + </p> + <p> + A self-fertilised plant of the same parentage as those in Table 2/12 had + been raised in a separate pot for a distinct purpose; and it proved + partially sterile, the anthers containing very little pollen. Several + flowers on this plant were crossed with the little pollen which could be + obtained from the other flowers on the same plant; and other flowers were + self-fertilised. From the seeds thus produced four crossed and four + self-fertilised plants were raised, which were planted in the usual manner + on the opposite sides of two pots. All these four crossed plants were + inferior in height to their opponents; they averaged 78.18 inches, whilst + the four self-fertilised plants averaged 84.8 inches; or as 100 to 108. + (2/2. From one of these self-fertilised plants, spontaneously + self-fertilised, I gathered twenty-four capsules, and they contained on an + average only 3.2 seeds per capsule; so that this plant had apparently + inherited some of the sterility of its parent.) This case, therefore, + confirms the last. Taking all the evidence together, we must conclude that + these strictly self-fertilised plants grew a little taller, were heavier, + and generally flowered before those derived from a cross between two + flowers on the same plant. These latter plants thus present a wonderful + contrast with those derived from a cross between two distinct individuals. + </p> + <p> + THE EFFECTS ON THE OFFSPRING OF A CROSS WITH A DISTINCT OR FRESH STOCK + BELONGING TO THE SAME VARIETY. + </p> + <p> + From the two foregoing series of experiments we see, firstly, the good + effects during several successive generations of a cross between distinct + plants, although these were in some degree inter-related and had been + grown under nearly the same conditions; and, secondly, the absence of all + such good effects from a cross between flowers on the same plant; the + comparison in both cases being made with the offspring of flowers + fertilised with their own pollen. The experiments now to be given show how + powerfully and beneficially plants, which have been intercrossed during + many successive generations, having been kept all the time under nearly + uniform conditions, are affected by a cross with another plant belonging + to the same variety, but to a distinct family or stock, which had grown + under different conditions. + </p> + <p> + [Several flowers on the crossed plants of the ninth generation in Table + 2/10, were crossed with pollen from another crossed plant of the same lot. + The seedlings thus raised formed the tenth intercrossed generation, and I + will call them the “INTERCROSSED PLANTS.” Several other flowers on the + same crossed plants of the ninth generation were fertilised (not having + been castrated) with pollen taken from plants of the same variety, but + belonging to a distinct family, which had been grown in a distant garden + at Colchester, and therefore under somewhat different conditions. The + capsules produced by this cross contained, to my surprise, fewer and + lighter seeds than did the capsules of the intercrossed plants; but this, + I think, must have been accidental. The seedlings raised from them I will + call the “COLCHESTER-CROSSED.” The two lots of seeds, after germinating on + sand, were planted in the usual manner on the opposite sides of five pots, + and the remaining seeds, whether or not in a state of germination, were + thickly sown on the opposite sides of a very large pot, Number 6 in Table + 2/13. In three of the six pots, after the young plants had twined a short + way up their sticks, one of the Colchester-crossed plants was much taller + than any one of the intercrossed plants on the opposite side of the same + pot; and in the three other pots somewhat taller. I should state that two + of the Colchester-crossed plants in Pot 4, when about two-thirds grown, + became much diseased, and were, together with their intercrossed + opponents, rejected. The remaining nineteen plants, when almost fully + grown, were measured, with the following result: + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/13. Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Colchester-Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Intercrossed Plants of the Tenth Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 87 : 78. Pot 1 : 87 4/8 : 68 4/8. Pot 1 : 85 1/8 : 94 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 93 6/8 : 60. Pot 2 : 85 4/8 : 87 2/8. Pot 2 : 90 5/8 : 45 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 84 2/8 : 70 1/8. Pot 3 : 92 4/8 : 81 6/8. Pot 3 : 85 : 86 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 95 6/8 : 65 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 90 4/8 : 85 6/8. Pot 5 : 86 6/8 : 63. Pot 5 : 84 : 62 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 90 4/8 : 43 4/8. Pot 6 : 75 : 39 6/8. Pot 6 : 71 : 30 2/8. Pot 6 : + 83 6/8 : 86. Pot 6 : 63 : 53. Pot 6 : 65 : 48 6/8. Crowded plants in a + very large pot. + </p> + <p> + Total : 1596.50 : 1249.75. + </p> + <p> + In sixteen out of these nineteen pairs, the Colchester-crossed plant + exceeded in height its intercrossed opponent. The average height of the + Colchester-crossed is 84.03 inches, and that of the intercrossed 65.78 + inches; or as 100 to 78. With respect to the fertility of the two lots, it + was too troublesome to collect and count the capsules on all the plants; + so I selected two of the best pots, 5 and 6, and in these the + Colchester-crossed produced 269 mature and half-mature capsules, whilst an + equal number of the intercrossed plants produced only 154 capsules; or as + 100 to 57. By weight the capsules from the Colchester-crossed plants were + to those from the intercrossed plants as 100 to 51; so that the former + probably contained a somewhat larger average number of seeds.] + </p> + <p> + We learn from this important experiment that plants in some degree + related, which had been intercrossed during the nine previous generations, + when they were fertilised with pollen from a fresh stock, yielded + seedlings as superior to the seedlings of the tenth intercrossed + generation, as these latter were to the self-fertilised plants of the + corresponding generation. For if we look to the plants of the ninth + generation in Table 2/10 (and these offer in most respects the fairest + standard of comparison) we find that the intercrossed plants were in + height to the self-fertilised as 100 to 79, and in fertility as 100 to 26; + whilst the Colchester-crossed plants are in height to the intercrossed as + 100 to 78, and in fertility as 100 to 51. + </p> + <p> + [THE DESCENDANTS OF THE SELF-FERTILISED PLANT, NAMED HERO, WHICH APPEARED + IN THE SIXTH SELF-FERTILISED GENERATION. + </p> + <p> + In the five generations before the sixth, the crossed plant of each pair + was taller than its self-fertilised opponent; but in the sixth generation + (Table 2/7, Pot 2) the Hero appeared, which after a long and dubious + struggle conquered its crossed opponent, though by only half an inch. I + was so much surprised at this fact, that I resolved to ascertain whether + this plant would transmit its powers of growth to its seedlings. Several + flowers on Hero were therefore fertilised with their own pollen, and the + seedlings thus raised were put into competition with self-fertilised and + intercrossed plants of the corresponding generation. The three lots of + seedlings thus all belong to the seventh generation. Their relative + heights are shown in Tables 2/14 and 2/15. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/14. Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants of the Seventh Generation, Children of + Hero. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants of the Seventh Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 74 : 89 4/8. Pot 1 : 60 : 61. Pot 1 : 55 2/8 : 49. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 92 : 82. Pot 2 : 91 6/8 : 56. Pot 2 : 74 2/8 : 38. + </p> + <p> + Total : 447.25 : 375.50. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the six self-fertilised children of Hero is 74.54 + inches, whilst that of the ordinary self-fertilised plants of the + corresponding generation is only 62.58 inches, or as 100 to 84. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/15. Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants of the Seventh Generation, Children of + Hero. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Intercrossed Plants of the Seventh Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 92 : 76 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 87 : 89. Pot 4 : 87 6/8 : 86 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 266.75 : 252.50. + </p> + <p> + Here the average height of the three self-fertilised children of Hero is + 88.91 inches, whilst that of the intercrossed plants is 84.16; or as 100 + to 95. We thus see that the self-fertilised children of Hero certainly + inherit the powers of growth of their parents; for they greatly exceed in + height the self-fertilised offspring of the other self-fertilised plants, + and even exceed by a trifle the intercrossed plants,—all of the + corresponding generation. + </p> + <p> + Several flowers on the self-fertilised children of Hero in Table 2/14 were + fertilised with pollen from the same flower; and from the seeds thus + produced, self-fertilised plants of the eighth generation (grandchildren + of Hero) were raised. Several other flowers on the same plants were + crossed with pollen from the other children of Hero. The seedlings raised + from this cross may be considered as the offspring of the union of + brothers and sisters. The result of the competition between these two sets + of seedlings (namely self-fertilised and the offspring of brothers and + sisters) is given in Table 2/16. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/16. Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Grandchildren of Hero, from the Self-fertilised + Children. Eighth Generation. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Grandchildren from a cross between the self-fertilised children + of Hero. Eighth Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 86 6/8 : 95 6/8. Pot 1 : 90 3/8 : 95 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 96 : 85. Pot 2 : 77 2/8 : 93. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 73 : 86 2/8. Pot 3 : 66 : 82 2/8. Pot 3 : 84 4/8 : 70 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 88 1/8 : 66 3/8. Pot 4 : 84 : 15 4/8. Pot 4 : 36 2/8 : 38. Pot 4 : + 74 : 78 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 90 1/8 : 82 6/8. Pot 5 : 90 5/8 : 83 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 1037.00 : 973.16. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the thirteen self-fertilised grandchildren of Hero + is 79.76 inches, and that of the grandchildren from a cross between the + self-fertilised children is 74.85; or as 100 to 94. But in Pot 4 one of + the crossed plants grew only to a height of 15 1/2 inches; and if this + plant and its opponent are struck out, as would be the fairest plan, the + average height of the crossed plants exceeds only by a fraction of an inch + that of the self-fertilised plants. It is therefore clear that a cross + between the self-fertilised children of Hero did not produce any + beneficial effect worth notice; and it is very doubtful whether this + negative result can be attributed merely to the fact of brothers and + sisters having been united, for the ordinary intercrossed plants of the + several successive generations must often have been derived from the union + of brothers and sisters (as shown in Chapter 1), and yet all of them were + greatly superior to the self-fertilised plants. We are therefore driven to + the suspicion, which we shall soon see strengthened, that Hero transmitted + to its offspring a peculiar constitution adapted for self-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + It would appear that the self-fertilised descendants of Hero have not only + inherited from Hero a power of growth equal to that of the ordinary + intercrossed plants, but have become more fertile when self-fertilised + than is usual with the plants of the present species. The flowers on the + self-fertilised grandchildren of Hero in Table 2.16 (the eighth generation + of self-fertilised plants) were fertilised with their own pollen and + produced plenty of capsules, ten of which (though this is too few a number + for a safe average) contained 5.2 seeds per capsule,—a higher + average than was observed in any other case with the self-fertilised + plants. The anthers produced by these self-fertilised grandchildren were + also as well developed and contained as much pollen as those on the + intercrossed plants of the corresponding generation; whereas this was not + the case with the ordinary self-fertilised plants of the later + generations. Nevertheless some few of the flowers produced by the + grandchildren of Hero were slightly monstrous, like those of the ordinary + self-fertilised plants of the later generations. In order not to recur to + the subject of fertility, I may add that twenty-one self-fertilised + capsules, spontaneously produced by the great-grandchildren of Hero + (forming the ninth generation of self-fertilised plants), contained on an + average 4.47 seeds; and this is as high an average as the self-fertilised + flowers of any generation usually yielded. + </p> + <p> + Several flowers on the self-fertilised grandchildren of Hero in Table 2/16 + were fertilised with pollen from the same flower; and the seedlings raised + from them (great-grandchildren of Hero) formed the ninth self-fertilised + generation. Several other flowers were crossed with pollen from another + grandchild, so that they may be considered as the offspring of brothers + and sisters, and the seedlings thus raised may be called the INTERCROSSED + great-grandchildren. And lastly, other flowers were fertilised with pollen + from a distinct stock, and the seedlings thus raised may be called the + COLCHESTER-CROSSED great-grandchildren. In my anxiety to see what the + result would be, I unfortunately planted the three lots of seeds (after + they had germinated on sand) in the hothouse in the middle of winter, and + in consequence of this the seedlings (twenty in number of each kind) + became very unhealthy, some growing only a few inches in height, and very + few to their proper height. The result, therefore, cannot be fully + trusted; and it would be useless to give the measurements in detail. In + order to strike as fair an average as possible, I first excluded all the + plants under 50 inches in height, thus rejecting all the most unhealthy + plants. The six self-fertilised thus left were on an average 66.86 inches + high; the eight intercrossed plants 63.2 high; and the seven + Colchester-crossed 65.37 high; so that there was not much difference + between the three sets, the self-fertilised plants having a slight + advantage. Nor was there any great difference when only the plants under + 36 inches in height were excluded. Nor again when all the plants, however + much dwarfed and unhealthy, were included. In this latter case the + Colchester-crossed gave the lowest average of all; and if these plants had + been in any marked manner superior to the other two lots, as from my + former experience I fully expected they would have been, I cannot but + think that some vestige of such superiority would have been evident, + notwithstanding the very unhealthy condition of most of the plants. No + advantage, as far as we can judge, was derived from intercrossing two of + the grandchildren of Hero, any more than when two of the children were + crossed. It appears therefore that Hero and its descendants have varied + from the common type, not only in acquiring great power of growth, and + increased fertility when subjected to self-fertilisation, but in not + profiting from a cross with a distinct stock; and this latter fact, if + trustworthy, is a unique case, as far as I have observed in all my + experiments.] + </p> + <p> + A SUMMARY ON THE GROWTH, VIGOUR, AND FERTILITY OF THE SUCCESSIVE + GENERATIONS OF THE CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF Ipomoea purpurea, + TOGETHER WITH SOME MISCELLANEOUS OBSERVATIONS. + </p> + <p> + In Table 2/17, we see the average or mean heights of the ten successive + generations of the intercrossed and self-fertilised plants, grown in + competition with each other; and in the right hand column we have the + ratios of the one to the other, the height of the intercrossed plants + being taken at 100. In the bottom line the mean height of the + seventy-three intercrossed plants is shown to be 85.84 inches, and that of + the seventy-three self-fertilised plants 66.02 inches, or as 100 to 77. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/17. Ipomoea purpurea. Summary of measurements of the ten + generations. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Name of Generation. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Number of Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Average Height of Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Number of Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 5: Average Height of Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 6: n in Ratio between Average Heights of Crossed and + Self-fertilised Plants, expressed as 100 to n. + </p> + <p> + First generation Table 2/1 : 6 : 86.00 : 6 : 65.66 : 76. + </p> + <p> + Second generation Table 2/2 : 6 : 84.16 : 6 : 66.33 : 79. + </p> + <p> + Third generation Table 2/3 : 6 : 77.41 : 6 : 52.83 : 68. + </p> + <p> + Fourth generation Table 2/5 : 7 : 69.78 : 7 : 60.14 : 86. + </p> + <p> + Fifth generation Table 2/6 : 6 : 82.54 : 6 : 62.33 : 75. + </p> + <p> + Sixth generation Table 2/7 : 6 : 87.50 : 6 : 63.16 : 72. + </p> + <p> + Seventh generation Table 2/8 : 9 : 83.94 : 9 : 68.25 : 81. + </p> + <p> + Eighth generation Table 2/9 : 8 : 113.25 : 8 : 96.65 : 85. + </p> + <p> + Ninth generation Table 2/10 : 14 : 81.39 : 14 : 64.07 : 79. + </p> + <p> + Tenth generation Table 2/11 : 5 : 93.70 : 5 : 50.40 : 54. + </p> + <p> + All ten generations together : 73 : 85.84 : 73 : 66.02 : 77. + </p> + <p> + (DIAGRAM 2/1. Diagram showing the mean heights of the crossed and + self-fertilised plants of Ipomoea purpurea in the ten generations; the + mean height of the crossed plants being taken as 100. On the right hand, + the mean heights of the crossed and self-fertilised plants of all the + generations taken together are shown (as eleven pairs of unequal vertical + lines.)) + </p> + <p> + The mean height of the self-fertilised plants in each of the ten + generations is also shown in the diagram 2/1, that of the intercrossed + plants being taken at 100, and on the right side we see the relative + heights of the seventy-three intercrossed plants, and of the seventy-three + self-fertilised plants. The difference in height between the crossed and + self-fertilised plants will perhaps be best appreciated by an + illustration: If all the men in a country were on an average 6 feet high, + and there were some families which had been long and closely interbred, + these would be almost dwarfs, their average height during ten generations + being only 4 feet 8 1/4 inches. + </p> + <p> + It should be especially observed that the average difference between the + crossed and self-fertilised plants is not due to a few of the former + having grown to an extraordinary height, or to a few of the + self-fertilised being extremely short, but to all the crossed plants + having surpassed their self-fertilised opponents, with the few following + exceptions. The first occurred in the sixth generation, in which the plant + named “Hero” appeared; two in the eighth generation, but the + self-fertilised plants in this generation were in an anomalous condition, + as they grew at first at an unusual rate and conquered for a time the + opposed crossed plants; and two exceptions in the ninth generation, though + one of these plants only equalled its crossed opponent. Therefore, of the + seventy-three crossed plants, sixty-eight grew to a greater height than + the self-fertilised plants, to which they were opposed. + </p> + <p> + In the right-hand column of figures, the difference in height between the + crossed and self-fertilised plants in the successive generations is seen + to fluctuate much, as might indeed have been expected from the small + number of plants measured in each generation being insufficient to give a + fair average. It should be remembered that the absolute height of the + plants goes for nothing, as each pair was measured as soon as one of them + had twined up to the summit of its rod. The great difference in the tenth + generation, namely, 100 to 54, no doubt was partly accidental, though, + when these plants were weighed, the difference was even greater, namely, + 100 to 44. The smallest amount of difference occurred in the fourth and + the eighth generations, and this was apparently due to both the crossed + and self-fertilised plants having become unhealthy, which prevented the + former attaining their usual degree of superiority. This was an + unfortunate circumstance, but my experiments were not thus vitiated, as + both lots of plants were exposed to the same conditions, whether + favourable or unfavourable. + </p> + <p> + There is reason to believe that the flowers of this Ipomoea, when growing + out of doors, are habitually crossed by insects, so that the first + seedlings which I raised from purchased seeds were probably the offspring + of a cross. I infer that this is the case, firstly from humble-bees often + visiting the flowers, and from the quantity of pollen left by them on the + stigmas of such flowers; and, secondly, from the plants raised from the + same lot of seed varying greatly in the colour of their flowers, for as we + shall hereafter see, this indicates much intercrossing. (2/3. Verlot says + ‘Sur la Production des Variétés’ 1865 page 66, that certain varieties of a + closely allied plant, the Convolvulus tricolor, cannot be kept pure unless + grown at a distance from all other varieties.) It is, therefore, + remarkable that the plants raised by me from flowers which were, in all + probability, self-fertilised for the first time after many generations of + crossing, should have been so markedly inferior in height to the + intercrossed plants as they were, namely, as 76 to 100. As the plants + which were self-fertilised in each succeeding generation necessarily + became much more closely interbred in the later than in the earlier + generations, it might have been expected that the difference in height + between them and the crossed plants would have gone on increasing; but, so + far is this from being the case, that the difference between the two sets + of plants in the seventh, eighth, and ninth generations taken together is + less than in the first and second generations together. When, however, we + remember that the self-fertilised and crossed plants are all descended + from the same mother-plant, that many of the crossed plants in each + generation were related, often closely related, and that all were exposed + to the same conditions, which, as we shall hereafter find, is a very + important circumstance, it is not at all surprising that the difference + between them should have somewhat decreased in the later generations. It + is, on the contrary, an astonishing fact, that the crossed plants should + have been victorious, even to a slight degree, over the self-fertilised + plants of the later generations. + </p> + <p> + The much greater constitutional vigour of the crossed than of the + self-fertilised plants, was proved on five occasions in various ways; + namely, by exposing them, while young, to a low temperature or to a sudden + change of temperature, or by growing them, under very unfavourable + conditions, in competition with full-grown plants of other kinds. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the productiveness of the crossed and self-fertilised + plants of the successive generations, my observations unfortunately were + not made on any uniform plan, partly from the want of time, and partly + from not having at first intended to observe more than a single + generation. A summary of the results is here given in a tabulated form, + the fertility of the crossed plants being taken as 100. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 2/18. Ratio of productiveness of crossed and self-fertilised plants. + Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + FIRST GENERATION OF CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS GROWING IN + COMPETITION WITH ONE ANOTHER. + </p> + <p> + Sixty-five capsules produced from flowers on five crossed plants + fertilised by pollen from a distinct plant, and fifty-five capsules + produced from flowers on five self-fertilised plants fertilised by their + own pollen, contained seeds in the proportion of : 100 to 93. + </p> + <p> + Fifty-six spontaneously self-fertilised capsules on the above five crossed + plants, and twenty-five spontaneously self-fertilised capsules on the + above five self-fertilised plants, yielded seeds in the proportion of : + 100 to 99. + </p> + <p> + Combining the total number of capsules produced by these plants, and the + average number of seeds in each, the above crossed and self-fertilised + plants yielded seeds in the proportion of : 100 to 64. + </p> + <p> + Other plants of this first generation grown under unfavourable conditions + and spontaneously self-fertilised, yielded seeds in the proportion of : + 100 to 45. + </p> + <h3> + THIRD GENERATION OF CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + Crossed capsules compared with self-fertilised capsules contained seeds in + the ratio of : 100 to 94. + </p> + <p> + An equal number of crossed and self-fertilised plants, both spontaneously + self-fertilised, produced capsules in the ratio of : 100 to 38. + </p> + <p> + And these capsules contained seeds in the ratio of : 100 to 94. + </p> + <p> + Combining these data, the productiveness of the crossed to the + self-fertilised plants, both spontaneously self-fertilised, was as : 100 + to 35. + </p> + <h3> + FOURTH GENERATION OF CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + Capsules from flowers on the crossed plants fertilised by pollen from + another plant, and capsules from flowers on the self-fertilised plants + fertilised with their own pollen, contained seeds in the proportion of : + 100 to 94. + </p> + <h3> + FIFTH GENERATION OF CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + The crossed plants produced spontaneously a vast number more pods (not + actually counted) than the self-fertilised, and these contained seeds in + the proportion of : 100 to 89. + </p> + <h3> + NINTH GENERATION OF CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + Fourteen crossed plants, spontaneously self-fertilised, and fourteen + self-fertilised plants spontaneously self-fertilised, yielded capsules + (the average number of seeds per capsule not having been ascertained) in + the proportion of : 100 to 26. + </p> + <p> + PLANTS DERIVED FROM A CROSSED WITH A FRESH STOCK COMPARED WITH + INTERCROSSED PLANTS. + </p> + <p> + The offspring of intercrossed plants of the ninth generation, crossed by a + fresh stock, compared with plants of the same stock intercrossed during + ten generations, both sets of plants left uncovered and naturally + fertilised, produced capsules by weight as : 100 to 51. + </p> + <p> + We see in this table that the crossed plants are always in some degree + more productive than the self-fertilised plants, by whatever standard they + are compared. The degree differs greatly; but this depends chiefly on + whether an average was taken of the seeds alone, or of the capsules alone, + or of both combined. The relative superiority of the crossed plants is + chiefly due to their producing a much greater number of capsules, and not + to each capsule containing a larger average number of seeds. For instance, + in the third generation the crossed and self-fertilised plants produced + capsules in the ratio of 100 to 38, whilst the seeds in the capsules on + the crossed plants were to those on the self-fertilised plants only as 100 + to 94. In the eighth generation the capsules on two self-fertilised plants + (not included in table 2/18), grown in separate pots and thus not + subjected to any competition, yielded the large average of 5.1 seeds. The + smaller number of capsules produced by the self-fertilised plants may be + in part, but not altogether, attributed to their lessened size or height; + this being chiefly due to their lessened constitutional vigour, so that + they were not able to compete with the crossed plants growing in the same + pots. The seeds produced by the crossed flowers on the crossed plants were + not always heavier than the self-fertilised seeds on the self-fertilised + plants. The lighter seeds, whether produced from crossed or + self-fertilised flowers, generally germinated before the heavier seeds. I + may add that the crossed plants, with very few exceptions, flowered before + their self-fertilised opponents, as might have been expected from their + greater height and vigour. + </p> + <p> + The impaired fertility of the self-fertilised plants was shown in another + way, namely, by their anthers being smaller than those in the flowers on + the crossed plants. This was first observed in the seventh generation, but + may have occurred earlier. Several anthers from flowers on the crossed and + self-fertilised plants of the eighth generation were compared under the + microscope; and those from the former were generally longer and plainly + broader than the anthers of the self-fertilised plants. The quantity of + pollen contained in one of the latter was, as far as could be judged by + the eye, about half of that contained in one from a crossed plant. The + impaired fertility of the self-fertilised plants of the eighth generation + was also shown in another manner, which may often be observed in hybrids—namely, + by the first-formed flowers being sterile. For instance, the fifteen first + flowers on a self-fertilised plant of one of the later generations were + carefully fertilised with their own pollen, and eight of them dropped off; + at the same time fifteen flowers on a crossed plant growing in the same + pot were self-fertilised, and only one dropped off. On two other crossed + plants of the same generation, several of the earliest flowers were + observed to fertilise themselves and to produce capsules. In the plants of + the ninth, and I believe of some previous generations, very many of the + flowers, as already stated, were slightly monstrous; and this probably was + connected with their lessened fertility. + </p> + <p> + All the self-fertilised plants of the seventh generation, and I believe of + one or two previous generations, produced flowers of exactly the same + tint, namely, of a rich dark purple. So did all the plants, without any + exception, in the three succeeding generations of self-fertilised plants; + and very many were raised on account of other experiments in progress not + here recorded. My attention was first called to this fact by my gardener + remarking that there was no occasion to label the self-fertilised plants, + as they could always be known by their colour. The flowers were as uniform + in tint as those of a wild species growing in a state of nature; whether + the same tint occurred, as is probable, in the earlier generations, + neither my gardener nor self could recollect. The flowers on the plants + which were first raised from purchased seed, as well as during the first + few generations, varied much in the depth of the purple tint; many were + more or less pink, and occasionally a white variety appeared. The crossed + plants continued to the tenth generation to vary in the same manner as + before, but to a much less degree, owing, probably, to their having become + more or less closely inter-related. We must therefore attribute the + extraordinary uniformity of colour in the flowers on the plants of the + seventh and succeeding self-fertilised generations, to inheritance not + having been interfered with by crosses during several preceding + generations, in combination with the conditions of life having been very + uniform. + </p> + <p> + A plant appeared in the sixth self-fertilised generation, named the Hero, + which exceeded by a little in height its crossed antagonist, and which + transmitted its powers of growth and increased self-fertility to its + children and grandchildren. A cross between the children of Hero did not + give to the grandchildren any advantage over the self-fertilised + grandchildren raised from the self-fertilised children. And as far as my + observations can be trusted, which were made on very unhealthy plants, the + great-grandchildren raised from intercrossing the grandchildren had no + advantage over the seedlings from the grandchildren the product of + continued self-fertilisation; and what is far more remarkable, the + great-grandchildren raised by crossing the grandchildren with a fresh + stock, had no advantage over either the intercrossed or self-fertilised + great-grandchildren. It thus appears that Hero and its descendants + differed in constitution in an extraordinary manner from ordinary plants + of the present species. + </p> + <p> + Although the plants raised during ten successive generations from crosses + between distinct yet inter-related plants almost invariably exceeded in + height, constitutional vigour, and fertility their self-fertilised + opponents, it has been proved that seedlings raised by intercrossing + flowers on the same plant are by no means superior, on the contrary are + somewhat inferior in height and weight, to seedlings raised from flowers + fertilised with their own pollen. This is a remarkable fact, which seems + to indicate that self-fertilisation is in some manner more advantageous + than crossing, unless the cross brings with it, as is generally the case, + some decided and preponderant advantage; but to this subject I shall recur + in a future chapter. + </p> + <p> + The benefits which so generally follow from a cross between two plants + apparently depend on the two differing somewhat in constitution or + character. This is shown by the seedlings from the intercrossed plants of + the ninth generation, when crossed with pollen from a fresh stock, being + as superior in height and almost as superior in fertility to the again + intercrossed plants, as these latter were to seedlings from + self-fertilised plants of the corresponding generation. We thus learn the + important fact that the mere act of crossing two distinct plants, which + are in some degree inter-related and which have been long subjected to + nearly the same conditions, does little good as compared with that from a + cross between plants belonging to different stocks or families, and which + have been subjected to somewhat different conditions. We may attribute the + good derived from the crossing of the intercrossed plants during the ten + successive generations to their still differing somewhat in constitution + or character, as was indeed proved by their flowers still differing + somewhat in colour. But the several conclusions which may be deduced from + the experiments on Ipomoea will be more fully considered in the final + chapters, after all my other observations have been given. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0003" id="link2HCH0003"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER III. SCROPHULARIACEAE, GESNERIACEAE, LABIATAE, ETC. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Mimulus luteus; height, vigour, and fertility of the crossed and + self-fertilised plants of the first four generations. + Appearance of a new, tall, and highly self-fertile variety. + Offspring from a cross between self-fertilised plants. + Effects of a cross with a fresh stock. + Effects of crossing flowers on the same plant. + Summary on Mimulus luteus. + Digitalis purpurea, superiority of the crossed plants. + Effects of crossing flowers on the same plant. + Calceolaria. + Linaria vulgaris. + Verbascum thapsus. + Vandellia nummularifolia. + Cleistogene flowers. + Gesneria pendulina. + Salvia coccinea. + Origanum vulgare, great increase of the crossed plants by stolons. + Thunbergia alata. +</pre> + <p> + In the family of the Scrophulariaceae I experimented on species in the six + following genera: Mimulus, Digitalis, Calceolaria, Linaria, Verbascum, and + Vandellia. + </p> + <p> + [3/2. SCROPHULARIACEAE.—Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + The plants which I raised from purchased seed varied greatly in the colour + of their flowers, so that hardly two individuals were quite alike; the + corolla being of all shades of yellow, with the most diversified blotches + of purple, crimson, orange, and coppery brown. But these plants differed + in no other respect. (3/1. I sent several specimens with variously + coloured flowers to Kew, and Dr. Hooker informs me that they all consisted + of Mimulus luteus. The flowers with much red have been named by + horticulturists as var. Youngiana.) The flowers are evidently well adapted + for fertilisation by the agency of insects; and in the case of a closely + allied species, Mimulus rosea, I have watched bees entering the flowers, + thus getting their backs well dusted with pollen; and when they entered + another flower the pollen was licked off their backs by the two-lipped + stigma, the lips of which are irritable and close like a forceps on the + pollen-grains. If no pollen is enclosed between the lips, these open again + after a time. Mr. Kitchener has ingeniously explained the use of these + movements, namely, to prevent the self-fertilisation of the flower. (3/2. + ‘A Year’s Botany’ 1874 page 118.) If a bee with no pollen on its back + enters a flower it touches the stigma, which quickly closes, and when the + bee retires dusted with pollen, it can leave none on the stigma of the + same flower. But as soon as it enters any other flower, plenty of pollen + is left on the stigma, which will be thus cross-fertilised. Nevertheless, + if insects are excluded, the flowers fertilise themselves perfectly and + produce plenty of seed; but I did not ascertain whether this is effected + by the stamens increasing in length with advancing age, or by the bending + down of the pistil. The chief interest in my experiments on the present + species, lies in the appearance in the fourth self-fertilised generation + of a variety which bore large peculiarly-coloured flowers, and grew to a + greater height than the other varieties; it likewise became more highly + self-fertile, so that this variety resembles the plant named Hero, which + appeared in the sixth self-fertilised generation of Ipomoea. + </p> + <p> + Some flowers on one of the plants raised from the purchased seeds were + fertilised with their own pollen; and others on the same plant were + crossed with pollen from a distinct plant. The seeds from twelve capsules + thus produced were placed in separate watch-glasses for comparison; and + those from the six crossed capsules appeared to the eye hardly more + numerous than those from the six self-fertilised capsules. But when the + seeds were weighed, those from the crossed capsules amounted to 1.02 + grain, whilst those from the self-fertilised capsules were only .81 grain; + so that the former were either heavier or more numerous than the latter, + in the ratio of 100 to 79. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FIRST GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Having ascertained, by leaving crossed and self-fertilised seed on damp + sand, that they germinated simultaneously, both kinds were thickly sown on + opposite sides of a broad and rather shallow pan; so that the two sets of + seedlings, which came up at the same time, were subjected to the same + unfavourable conditions. This was a bad method of treatment, but this + species was one of the first on which I experimented. When the crossed + seedlings were on an average half an inch high, the self-fertilised ones + were only a quarter of an inch high. When grown to their full height under + the above unfavourable conditions, the four tallest crossed plants + averaged 7.62, and the four tallest self-fertilised 5.87 inches in height; + or as 100 to 77. Ten flowers on the crossed plants were fully expanded + before one on the self-fertilised plants. A few of these plants of both + lots were transplanted into a large pot with plenty of good earth, and the + self-fertilised plants, not now being subjected to severe competition, + grew during the following year as tall as the crossed plants; but from a + case which follows it is doubtful whether they would have long continued + equal. Some flowers on the crossed plants were crossed with pollen from + another plant, and the capsules thus produced contained a rather greater + weight of seed than those on the self-fertilised plants again + self-fertilised. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Seeds from the foregoing plants, fertilised in the manner just stated, + were sown on the opposite sides of a small pot (1) and came up crowded. + The four tallest crossed seedlings, at the time of flowering, averaged 8 + inches in height, whilst the four tallest self-fertilised plants averaged + only 4 inches. Crossed seeds were sown by themselves in a second small + pot, and self-fertilised seeds were sown by themselves in a third small + pot so that there was no competition whatever between these two lots. + Nevertheless the crossed plants grew from 1 to 2 inches higher on an + average than the self-fertilised. Both lots looked equally vigorous, but + the crossed plants flowered earlier and more profusely than the + self-fertilised. In Pot 1, in which the two lots competed with each other, + the crossed plants flowered first and produced a large number of capsules, + whilst the self-fertilised produced only nineteen. The contents of twelve + capsules from the crossed flowers on the crossed plants, and of twelve + capsules from self-fertilised flowers on the self-fertilised plants, were + placed in separate watch-glasses for comparison; and the crossed seeds + seemed more numerous by half than the self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + The plants on both sides of Pot 1, after they had seeded, were cut down + and transplanted into a large pot with plenty of good earth, and on the + following spring, when they had grown to a height of between 5 and 6 + inches, the two lots were equal, as occurred in a similar experiment in + the last generation. But after some weeks the crossed plants exceeded the + self-fertilised ones on the opposite side of the same pot, though not + nearly to so great a degree as before, when they were subjected to very + severe competition. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE THIRD GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Crossed seeds from the crossed plants, and self-fertilised seeds from the + self-fertilised plants of the last generation, were sown thickly on + opposite sides of a small pot, Number 1. The two tallest plants on each + side were measured after they had flowered, and the two crossed ones were + 12 and 7 1/2 inches, and the two self-fertilised ones 8 and 5 1/2 inches + in height; that is, in the ratio of 100 to 69. Twenty flowers on the + crossed plants were again crossed and produced twenty capsules; ten of + which contained 1.33 grain weight of seeds. Thirty flowers on the + self-fertilised plants were again self-fertilised and produced twenty-six + capsules; ten of the best of which (many being very poor) contained only + .87 grain weight of seeds; that is, in the ratio of 100 to 65 by weight. + </p> + <p> + The superiority of the crossed over the self-fertilised plants was proved + in various ways. Self-fertilised seeds were sown on one side of a pot, and + two days afterwards crossed seeds on the opposite side. The two lots of + seedlings were equal until they were above half an inch high; but when + fully grown the two tallest crossed plants attained a height of 12 1/2 and + 8 3/4 inches, whilst the two tallest self-fertilised plants were only 8 + and 5 1/2 inches high. + </p> + <p> + In a third pot, crossed seeds were sown four days after the + self-fertilised, and the seedlings from the latter had at first, as might + have been expected, an advantage; but when the two lots were between 5 and + 6 inches in height, they were equal, and ultimately the three tallest + crossed plants were 11, 10, and 8 inches, whilst the three tallest + self-fertilised were 12, 8 1/2, and 7 1/2 inches in height. So that there + was not much difference between them, the crossed plants having an average + advantage of only the third of an inch. The plants were cut down, and + without being disturbed were transplanted into a larger pot. Thus the two + lots started fair on the following spring, and now the crossed plants + showed their inherent superiority, for the two tallest were 13 inches, + whilst the two tallest self-fertilised plants were only 11 and 8 1/2 + inches in height; or as 100 to 75. The two lots were allowed to fertilise + themselves spontaneously: the crossed plants produced a large number of + capsules, whilst the self-fertilised produced very few and poor ones. The + seeds from eight of the capsules on the crossed plants weighed .65 grain, + whilst those from eight of the capsules on the self-fertilised plants + weighed only .22 grain; or as 100 to 34. + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants in the above three pots, as in almost all the previous + experiments, flowered before the self-fertilised. This occurred even in + the third pot in which the crossed seeds were sown four days after the + self-fertilised seeds. + </p> + <p> + Lastly, seeds of both lots were sown on opposite sides of a large pot in + which a Fuchsia had long been growing, so that the earth was full of + roots. Both lots grew miserably; but the crossed seedlings had an + advantage at all times, and ultimately attained to a height of 3 1/2 + inches, whilst the self-fertilised seedlings never exceeded 1 inch. The + several foregoing experiments prove in a decisive manner the superiority + in constitutional vigour of the crossed over the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + In the three generations now described and taken together, the average + height of the ten tallest crossed plants was 8.19 inches, and that of the + ten tallest self-fertilised plants 5.29 inches (the plants having been + grown in small pots), or as 100 to 65. + </p> + <p> + In the next or fourth self-fertilised generation, several plants of a new + and tall variety appeared, which increased in the later self-fertilised + generations, owing to its great self-fertility, to the complete exclusion + of the original kinds. The same variety also appeared amongst the crossed + plants, but as it was not at first regarded with any particular attention, + I know not how far it was used for raising the intercrossed plants; and in + the later crossed generations it was rarely present. Owing to the + appearance of this tall variety, the comparison of the crossed and + self-fertilised plants of the fifth and succeeding generations was + rendered unfair, as all the self-fertilised and only a few or none of the + crossed plants consisted of it. Nevertheless, the results of the later + experiments are in some respects well worth giving. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FOURTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Seeds of the two kinds, produced in the usual way from the two sets of + plants of the third generation, were sown on opposite sides of two pots (1 + and 2); but the seedlings were not thinned enough and did not grow well. + Many of the self-fertilised plants, especially in one of the pots, + consisted of the new and tall variety above referred to, which bore large + and almost white flowers marked with crimson blotches. I will call it the + WHITE VARIETY. I believe that it first appeared amongst both the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the last generation; but neither my gardener + nor myself could remember any such variety in the seedlings raised from + the purchased seed. It must therefore have arisen either through ordinary + variation, or, judging from its appearance amongst both the crossed and + self-fertilised plants, more probably through reversion to a formerly + existing variety. + </p> + <p> + In Pot 1 the tallest crossed plant was 8 1/2 inches, and the tallest + self-fertilised 5 inches in height. In Pot 2, the tallest crossed plant + was 6 1/2 inches, and the tallest self-fertilised plant, which consisted + of the white variety, 7 inches in height; and this was the first instance + in my experiments on Mimulus in which the tallest self-fertilised plant + exceeded the tallest crossed. Nevertheless, the two tallest crossed plants + taken together were to the two tallest self-fertilised plants in height as + 100 to 80. As yet the crossed plants were superior to the self-fertilised + in fertility; for twelve flowers on the crossed plants were crossed and + yielded ten capsules, the seeds of which weighed 1.71 grain. Twenty + flowers on the self-fertilised plants were self-fertilised, and produced + fifteen capsules, all appearing poor; and the seeds from ten of them + weighed only .68 grain, so that from an equal number of capsules the + crossed seeds were to the self-fertilised in weight as 100 to 40. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FIFTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Seeds from both lots of the fourth generation, fertilised in the usual + manner, were sown on opposite sides of three pots. When the seedlings + flowered, most of the self-fertilised plants were found to consist of the + tall white variety. Several of the crossed plants in Pot 1 likewise + belonged to this variety, as did a very few in Pots 2 and 3. The tallest + crossed plant in Pot 1 was 7 inches, and the tallest self-fertilised plant + on the opposite side 8 inches; in Pots 2 and 3 the tallest crossed were 4 + 1/2 and 5 1/2, and the tallest self-fertilised 7 and 6 1/2 inches in + height; so that the average height of the tallest plants in the two lots + was as 100 for the crossed to 126 for the self-fertilised; and thus we + have a complete reversal of what occurred in the four previous + generations. Nevertheless, in all three pots the crossed plants retained + their habit of flowering before the self-fertilised. The plants were + unhealthy from being crowded and from the extreme heat of the season, and + were in consequence more or less sterile; but the crossed plants were + somewhat less sterile than the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SIXTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Seeds from plants of the fifth generation crossed and self-fertilised in + the usual manner were sown on opposite sides of several pots. On the + self-fertilised side every single plant belonged to the tall white + variety. On the crossed side some plants belonged to this variety, but the + greater number approached in character to the old and shorter kinds with + smaller yellowish flowers blotched with coppery brown. When the plants on + both sides were from 2 to 3 inches in height they were equal, but when + fully grown the self-fertilised were decidedly the tallest and finest + plants, but, from want of time, they were not actually measured. In half + the pots the first plant which flowered was a self-fertilised one, and in + the other half a crossed one. And now another remarkable change was + clearly perceived, namely, that the self-fertilised plants had become more + self-fertile than the crossed. The pots were all put under a net to + exclude insects, and the crossed plants produced spontaneously only + fifty-five capsules, whilst the self-fertilised plants produced eighty-one + capsules, or as 100 to 147. The seeds from nine capsules of both lots were + placed in separate watch-glasses for comparison, and the self-fertilised + appeared rather the more numerous. Besides these spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules, twenty flowers on the crossed plants again + crossed yielded sixteen capsules; twenty-five flowers on the + self-fertilised plants again self-fertilised yielded seventeen capsules, + and this is a larger proportional number of capsules than was produced by + the self-fertilised flowers on the self-fertilised plants in the previous + generations. The contents of ten capsules of both these lots were compared + in separate watch-glasses, and the seeds from the self-fertilised appeared + decidedly more numerous than those from the crossed plants. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SEVENTH GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Crossed and self-fertilised seeds from the crossed and self-fertilised + plants of the sixth generation were sown in the usual manner on opposite + sides of three pots, and the seedlings were well and equally thinned. + Every one of the self-fertilised plants (and many were raised) in this, as + well as in the eighth and ninth generations, belonged to the tall white + variety. Their uniformity of character, in comparison with the seedlings + first raised from the purchased seed, was quite remarkable. On the other + hand, the crossed plants differed much in the tints of their flowers, but + not, I think, to so great a degree as those first raised. I determined + this time to measure the plants on both sides carefully. The + self-fertilised seedlings came up rather before the crossed, but both lots + were for a time of equal height. When first measured, the average height + of the six tallest crossed plants in the three pots was 7.02, and that of + the six tallest self-fertilised plants 8.97 inches, or as 100 to 128. When + fully grown the same plants were again measured, with the result shown in + Table 3/18. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/18. Mimulus luteus (Seventh Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 11 2/8 : 19 1/8. Pot 1 : 11 7/8 : 18. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 12 6/8 : 18 2/8. Pot 2 : 11 2/8 : 14 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 9 6/8 : 12 6/8. Pot 3 : 11 6/8 : 11. + </p> + <p> + Total : 68.63 : 93.88. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the six crossed is here 11.43, and that of the six + self-fertilised 15.64, or as 100 to 137. + </p> + <p> + As it is now evident that the tall white variety transmitted its + characters faithfully, and as the self-fertilised plants consisted + exclusively of this variety, it was manifest that they would always exceed + in height the crossed plants which belonged chiefly to the original + shorter varieties. This line of experiment was therefore discontinued, and + I tried whether intercrossing two self-fertilised plants of the sixth + generation, growing in distinct pots, would give their offspring any + advantage over the offspring of flowers on one of the same plants + fertilised with their own pollen. These latter seedlings formed the + seventh generation of self-fertilised plants, like those in the right hand + column in Table 3/18; the crossed plants were the product of six previous + self-fertilised generations with an intercross in the last generation. The + seeds were allowed to germinate on sand, and were planted in pairs on + opposite sides of four pots, all the remaining seeds being sown crowded on + opposite sides of Pot 5 in Table 3/19; the three tallest on each side in + this latter pot being alone measured. All the plants were twice measured—the + first time whilst young, and the average height of the crossed plants to + that of the self-fertilised was then as 100 to 122. When fully grown they + were again measured, as in Table 3/19. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/19. Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Intercrossed Plants from Self-fertilised Plants of the Sixth + Generation. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants of the Seventh Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 12 6/8 : 15 2/8. Pot 1 : 10 4/8 : 11 5/8. Pot 1 : 10 : 11. Pot 1 : + 14 5/8 : 11. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 10 2/8 : 11 3/8. Pot 2 : 7 6/8 : 11 4/8. Pot 2 : 12 1/8 : 8 5/8. + Pot 2 : 7 : 14 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 13 5/8 : 10 3/8. Pot 3 : 12 2/8 : 11 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 7 1/8 : 14 6/8. Pot 4 : 8 2/8 : 7. Pot 4 : 7 2/8 : 8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 8 5/8 : 10 2/8 Pot 5 : 9 : 9 3/8. Pot 5 : 8 2/8 : 9 2/8. Crowded. + </p> + <p> + Total : 159.38 : 175.50. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the sixteen intercrossed plants is here 9.96 inches, + and that of the sixteen self-fertilised plants 10.96, or as 100 to 110; so + that the intercrossed plants, the progenitors of which had been + self-fertilised for the six previous generations, and had been exposed + during the whole time to remarkably uniform conditions, were somewhat + inferior in height to the plants of the seventh self-fertilised + generation. But as we shall presently see that a similar experiment made + after two additional generations of self-fertilisation gave a different + result, I know not how far to trust the present one. In three of the five + pots in Table 3/19 a self-fertilised plant flowered first, and in the + other two a crossed plant. These self-fertilised plants were remarkably + fertile, for twenty flowers fertilised with their own pollen produced no + less than nineteen very fine capsules! + </p> + <h3> + THE EFFECTS OF A CROSS WITH A DISTINCT STOCK. + </h3> + <p> + Some flowers on the self-fertilised plants in Pot 4 in Table 3/19 were + fertilised with their own pollen, and plants of the eighth self-fertilised + generation were thus raised, merely to serve as parents in the following + experiment. Several flowers on these plants were allowed to fertilise + themselves spontaneously (insects being of course excluded), and the + plants raised from these seeds formed the ninth self-fertilised + generation; they consisted wholly of the tall white variety with crimson + blotches. Other flowers on the same plants of the eighth self-fertilised + generation were crossed with pollen taken from another plant of the same + lot; so that the seedlings thus raised were the offspring of eight + previous generations of self-fertilisation with an intercross in the last + generation; these I will call the INTERCROSSED PLANTS. Lastly, other + flowers on the same plants of the eighth self-fertilised generation were + crossed with pollen taken from plants which had been raised from seed + procured from a garden at Chelsea. The Chelsea plants bore yellow flowers + blotched with red, but differed in no other respect. They had been grown + out of doors, whilst mine had been cultivated in pots in the greenhouse + for the last eight generations, and in a different kind of soil. The + seedlings raised from this cross with a wholly different stock may be + called the CHELSEA-CROSSED. The three lots of seeds thus obtained were + allowed to germinate on bare sand; and whenever a seed in all three lots, + or in only two, germinated at the same time, they were planted in pots + superficially divided into three or two compartments. The remaining seeds, + whether or not in a state of germination, were thickly sown in three + divisions in a large pot, 10, in Table 3/20. When the plants had grown to + their full height they were measured, as shown in Table 3/20; but only the + three tallest plants in each of the three divisions in Pot 10 were + measured. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/20. Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants from Self-fertilised Plants of the Eighth Generation + crossed by Chelsea Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Plants from an intercross between the Plants of the Eighth + Self-fertilised Generation. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Self-fertilised Plants of the Ninth Generation from Plants of + the Eighth Self-fertilised Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 30 7/8 : 14 : 9 4/8. Pot 1 : 28 3/8 : 13 6/8 : 10 5/8. Pot 1 : + — : 13 7/8 : 10. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 20 6/8 : 11 4/8 : 11 6/8. Pot 2 : 22 2/8 : 12 : 12 3/8. Pot 2 : + — : 9 1/8 : —. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 23 6/8 : 12 2/8 : 8 5/8. Pot 3 : 24 1/8 : — : 11 4/8. Pot 3 + : 25 6/8 : — : 6 7/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 22 5/8 : 9 2/8 : 4. Pot 4 : 22 : 8 1/8 : 13 3/8. Pot 4 : 17 : + — : 11. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 22 3/8 : 9 : 4 4/8. Pot 5 : 19 5/8 : 11 : 13. Pot 5 : 23 4/8 : + — : 13 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 28 2/8 : 18 6/8 : 12. Pot 6 : 22 : 7 : 16 1/8. Pot 6 : — : + 12 4/8 : —. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 12 4/8 : 15 : —. Pot 7 : 24 3/8 : 12 3/8 : —. Pot 7 : + 20 4/8 : 11 2/8 : —. Pot 7 : 26 4/8 : 15 2/8 : —. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 17 2/8 : 13 3/8 : —. Pot 8 : 22 6/8 : 14 5/8 : —. Pot + 8 : 27 : 14 3/8 : —. + </p> + <p> + Pot 9 : 22 6/8 : 11 6/8 : —. Pot 9 : 6 : 17 : —. Pot 9 : 20 + 2/8 : 14 7/8 : —. + </p> + <p> + Pot 10 : 18 1/8 : 9 2/8 : 10 3/8. Pot 10 : 16 5/8 : 8 2/8 : 8 1/8. Pot 10 + : 17 4/8 : 10 : 11 2/8. Crowded plants. + </p> + <p> + Total : 605.38 : 329.50 : 198.50. + </p> + <p> + In this table the average height of the twenty-eight Chelsea-crossed + plants is 21.62 inches; that of the twenty-seven intercrossed plants 12.2; + and that of the nineteen self-fertilised 10.44. But with respect to the + latter it will be the fairest plan to strike out two dwarfed ones (only 4 + inches in height), so as not to exaggerate the inferiority of the + self-fertilised plants; and this will raise the average height of the + seventeen remaining self-fertilised plants to 11.2 inches. Therefore the + Chelsea-crossed are to the intercrossed in height as 100 to 56; the + Chelsea-crossed to the self-fertilised as 100 to 52; and the intercrossed + to the self-fertilised as 100 to 92. We thus see how immensely superior in + height the Chelsea-crossed are to the intercrossed and to the + self-fertilised plants. They began to show their superiority when only one + inch high. They were also, when fully grown, much more branched with + larger leaves and somewhat larger flowers than the plants of the other two + lots, so that if they had been weighed, the ratio would certainly have + been much higher than that of 100 to 56 and 52. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed plants are here to the self-fertilised in height as 100 + to 92; whereas in the analogous experiment given in Table 3/19 the + intercrossed plants from the self-fertilised plants of the sixth + generation were inferior in height to the self-fertilised plants in the + ratio of 100 to 110. I doubt whether this discordance in the results of + the two experiments can be explained by the self-fertilised plants in the + present case having been raised from spontaneously self-fertilised seeds, + whereas in the former case they were raised from artificially + self-fertilised seeds; nor by the present plants having been + self-fertilised during two additional generations, though this is a more + probable explanation. + </p> + <p> + With respect to fertility, the twenty-eight Chelsea-crossed plants + produced 272 capsules; the twenty-seven intercrossed plants produced 24; + and the seventeen self-fertilised plants 17 capsules. All the plants were + left uncovered so as to be naturally fertilised, and empty capsules were + rejected. + </p> + <p> + Therefore 20 Chelsea-crossed plants would have produced 194.29 capsules. + </p> + <p> + Therefore 20 Intercrossed plants would have produced 17.77 capsules. + </p> + <p> + Therefore 20 Self-fertilised plants would have produced 20.00 capsules. + </p> + <p> + The seeds contained in 8 capsules from the Chelsea-crossed plants weighed + 1.1 grains. + </p> + <p> + The seeds contained in 8 capsules from the Intercrossed plants weighed + 0.51 grains. + </p> + <p> + The seeds contained in 8 capsules from the Self-fertilised plants weighed + 0.33 grains. + </p> + <p> + If we combine the number of capsules produced together with the average + weight of contained seeds, we get the following extraordinary ratios: + </p> + <p> + Weight of seed produced by the same number of Chelsea-crossed and + intercrossed plants as 100 to 4. + </p> + <p> + Weight of seed produced by the same number of Chelsea-crossed and + self-fertilised plants as 100 to 3. + </p> + <p> + Weight of seeds produced by the same number of intercrossed and + self-fertilised plants as 100 to 73. + </p> + <p> + It is also a remarkable fact that the Chelsea-crossed plants exceeded the + two other lots in hardiness, as greatly as they did in height, luxuriance, + and fertility. In the early autumn most of the pots were bedded out in the + open ground; and this always injures plants which have been long kept in a + warm greenhouse. All three lots consequently suffered greatly, but the + Chelsea-crossed plants much less than the other two lots. On the 3rd of + October the Chelsea-crossed plants began to flower again, and continued to + do so for some time; whilst not a single flower was produced by the plants + of the other two lots, the stems of which were cut almost down to the + ground and seemed half dead. Early in December there was a sharp frost, + and the stems of Chelsea-crossed were now cut down; but on the 23rd of + December they began to shoot up again from the roots, whilst all the + plants of the other two lots were quite dead. + </p> + <p> + Although several of the self-fertilised seeds, from which the plants in + the right hand column in Table 3/20 were raised, germinated (and were of + course rejected) before any of those of the other two lots, yet in only + one of the ten pots did a self-fertilised plant flower before the + Chelsea-crossed or the intercrossed plants growing in the same pots. The + plants of these two latter lots flowered at the same time, though the + Chelsea-crossed grew so much taller and more vigorously than the + intercrossed. + </p> + <p> + As already stated, the flowers of the plants originally raised from the + Chelsea seeds were yellow; and it deserves notice that every one of the + twenty-eight seedlings raised from the tall white variety fertilised, + without being castrated, with pollen from the Chelsea plants, produced + yellow flowers; and this shows how prepotent this colour, which is the + natural one of the species, is over the white colour. + </p> + <p> + THE EFFECTS ON THE OFFSPRING OF INTERCROSSING FLOWERS ON THE SAME PLANT, + INSTEAD OF CROSSING DISTINCT INDIVIDUALS. + </p> + <p> + In all the foregoing experiments the crossed plants were the product of a + cross between distinct plants. I now selected a very vigorous plant in + Table 3/20, raised by fertilising a plant of the eighth self-fertilised + generation with pollen from the Chelsea stock. Several flowers on this + plant were crossed with pollen from other flowers on the same plant, and + several other flowers were fertilised with their own pollen. The seed thus + produced was allowed to germinate on bare sand; and the seedlings were + planted in the usual manner on the opposite sides of six pots. All the + remaining seeds, whether or not in a state of germination, were sown + thickly in Pot 7; the three tallest plants on each side of this latter pot + being alone measured. As I was in a hurry to learn the result, some of + these seeds were sown late in the autumn, but the plants grew so + irregularly during the winter, that one crossed plant was 28 1/2 inches, + and two others only 4, or less than 4 inches in height, as may be seen in + Table 3/21. Under such circumstances, as I have observed in many other + cases, the result is not in the least trustworthy; nevertheless I feel + bound to give the measurements. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/21. Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants raised from a Cross between different Flowers on the same + Plant. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Plants raised from Flowers fertilised with their own Pollen. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 17 : 17. Pot 1 : 9 : 3 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 28 2/8 : 19 1/8. Pot 2 : 16 4/8 : 6. Pot 2 : 13 5/8 : 2. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 4 : 15 6/8. Pot 3 : 2 2/8 : 10. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 23 4/8 : 6 2/8. Pot 4 : 15 4/8 : 7 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 7 : 13 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 18 3/8 : 1 4/8. Pot 6 : 11 : 2. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 21 : 15 1/8. Pot 7 : 11 6/8 : 11. Pot 7 : 12 1/8 : 11 2/8. + Crowded. + </p> + <p> + Total : 210.88 : 140.75. + </p> + <p> + The fifteen crossed plants here average 14.05, and the fifteen + self-fertilised plants 9.38 in height, or as 100 to 67. But if all the + plants under ten inches in height are struck out, the ratio of the eleven + crossed plants to the eight self-fertilised plants is as 100 to 82. + </p> + <p> + On the following spring, some remaining seeds of the two lots were treated + in exactly the same manner; and the measurements of the seedlings are + given in Table 3/22. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/22. Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants in inches: + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants raised from a Cross between different Flowers on the same + Plant. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Plants raised from Flowers fertilised with their own Pollen. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 15 1/8 : 19 1/8. Pot 1 : 12 : 20 5/8. Pot 1 : 10 1/8 : 12 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 16 2/8 : 11 2/8. Pot 2 : 13 5/8 : 19 3/8. Pot 2 : 20 1/8 : 17 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 18 7/8 : 12 6/8. Pot 3 : 15 : 15 6/8. Pot 3 : 13 7/8 : 17. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 19 2/8 : 16 2/8. Pot 4 : 19 6/8 : 21 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 25 3/8 : 22 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 15 : 19 5/8. Pot 6 : 20 2/8 : 16 2/8. Pot 6 : 27 2/8 : 19 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 7 6/8 : 7 6/8. Pot 7 : 14 : 8. Pot 7 : 13 4/8 : 7. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 18 2/8 : 20 3/8. Pot 8 : 18 6/8 : 17 6/8. Pot 8 : 18 3/8 : 15 4/8. + Pot 8 : 18 3/8 : 15 1/8. Crowded. + </p> + <p> + Total : 370.88 : 353.63. + </p> + <p> + Here the average height of the twenty-two crossed plants is 16.85, and + that of the twenty-two self-fertilised plants 16.07; or as 100 to 95. But + if four of the plants in Pot 7, which are much shorter than any of the + others, are struck out (and this would be the fairest plan), the + twenty-one crossed are to the nineteen self-fertilised plants in height as + 100 to 100.6—that is, are equal. All the plants, except the crowded + ones in Pot 8, after being measured were cut down, and the eighteen + crossed plants weighed 10 ounces, whilst the same number of + self-fertilised plants weighed 10 1/4 ounces, or as 100 to 102.5; but if + the dwarfed plants in Pot 7 had been excluded, the self-fertilised would + have exceeded the crossed in weight in a higher ratio. In all the previous + experiments in which seedlings were raised from a cross between distinct + plants, and were put into competition with self-fertilised plants, the + former generally flowered first; but in the present case, in seven out of + the eight pots a self-fertilised plant flowered before a crossed one on + the opposite side. Considering all the evidence with respect to the plants + in Table3/ 22, a cross between two flowers on the same plant seems to give + no advantage to the offspring thus produced, the self-fertilised plants + being in weight superior. But this conclusion cannot be absolutely + trusted, owing to the measurements given in Table 3/21, though these + latter, from the cause already assigned, are very much less trustworthy + than the present ones.] + </p> + <p> + A SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS ON Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + In the three first generations of crossed and self-fertilised plants, the + tallest plants alone on each side of the several pots were measured; and + the average height of the ten crossed to that of the ten self-fertilised + plants was as 100 to 64. The crossed were also much more fertile than the + self-fertilised, and so much more vigorous that they exceeded them in + height, even when sown on the opposite side of the same pot after an + interval of four days. The same superiority was likewise shown in a + remarkable manner when both kinds of seeds were sown on the opposite sides + of a pot with very poor earth full of the roots of another plant. In one + instance crossed and self-fertilised seedlings, grown in rich soil and not + put into competition with each other, attained to an equal height. When we + come to the fourth generation the two tallest crossed plants taken + together exceeded by only a little the two tallest self-fertilised plants, + and one of the latter beat its crossed opponent,—a circumstance + which had not occurred in the previous generations. This victorious + self-fertilised plant consisted of a new white-flowered variety, which + grew taller than the old yellowish varieties. From the first it seemed to + be rather more fertile, when self-fertilised, than the old varieties, and + in the succeeding self-fertilised generations became more and more + self-fertile. In the sixth generation the self-fertilised plants of this + variety compared with the crossed plants produced capsules in the + proportion of 147 to 100, both lots being allowed to fertilise themselves + spontaneously. In the seventh generation twenty flowers on one of these + plants artificially self-fertilised yielded no less than nineteen very + fine capsules! + </p> + <p> + This variety transmitted its characters so faithfully to all the + succeeding self-fertilised generations, up to the last or ninth, that all + the many plants which were raised presented a complete uniformity of + character; thus offering a remarkable contrast with the seedlings raised + from the purchased seeds. Yet this variety retained to the last a latent + tendency to produce yellow flowers; for when a plant of the eighth + self-fertilised generation was crossed with pollen from a yellow-flowered + plant of the Chelsea stock, every single seedling bore yellow flowers. A + similar variety, at least in the colour of its flowers, also appeared + amongst the crossed plants of the third generation. No attention was at + first paid to it, and I know not how far it was at first used either for + crossing or self-fertilisation. In the fifth generation most of the + self-fertilised plants, and in the sixth and all the succeeding + generations every single plant consisted of this variety; and this no + doubt was partly due to its great and increasing self-fertility. On the + other hand, it disappeared from amongst the crossed plants in the later + generations; and this was probably due to the continued intercrossing of + the several plants. From the tallness of this variety, the self-fertilised + plants exceeded the crossed plants in height in all the generations from + the fifth to the seventh inclusive; and no doubt would have done so in the + later generations, had they been grown in competition with one another. In + the fifth generation the crossed plants were in height to the + self-fertilised, as 100 to 126; in the sixth, as 100 to 147; and in the + seventh generation, as 100 to 137. This excess of height may be attributed + not only to this variety naturally growing taller than the other plants, + but to its possessing a peculiar constitution, so that it did not suffer + from continued self-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + This variety presents a strikingly analogous case to that of the plant + called the Hero, which appeared in the sixth self-fertilised generation of + Ipomoea. If the seeds produced by Hero had been as greatly in excess of + those produced by the other plants, as was the case with Mimulus, and if + all the seeds had been mingled together, the offspring of Hero would have + increased to the entire exclusion of the ordinary plants in the later + self-fertilised generations, and from naturally growing taller would have + exceeded the crossed plants in height in each succeeding generation. + </p> + <p> + Some of the self-fertilised plants of the sixth generation were + intercrossed, as were some in the eighth generation; and the seedlings + from these crosses were grown in competition with self-fertilised plants + of the two corresponding generations. In the first trial the intercrossed + plants were less fertile than the self-fertilised, and less tall in the + ratio of 100 to 110. In the second trial, the intercrossed plants were + more fertile than the self-fertilised in the ratio of 100 to 73, and + taller in the ratio of 100 to 92. Notwithstanding that the self-fertilised + plants in the second trial were the product of two additional generations + of self-fertilisation, I cannot understand this discordance in the results + of the two analogous experiments. + </p> + <p> + The most important of all the experiments on Mimulus are those in which + flowers on plants of the eighth self-fertilised generation were again + self-fertilised; other flowers on distinct plants of the same lot were + intercrossed; and others were crossed with a new stock of plants from + Chelsea. The Chelsea-crossed seedlings were to the intercrossed in height + as 100 to 56, and in fertility as 100 to 4; and they were to the + self-fertilised plants, in height as 100 to 52, and in fertility as 100 to + 3. These Chelsea-crossed plants were also much more hardy than the plants + of the other two lots; so that altogether the gain from the cross with a + fresh stock was wonderfully great. + </p> + <p> + Lastly, seedlings raised from a cross between flowers on the same plant + were not superior to those from flowers fertilised with their own pollen; + but this result cannot be absolutely trusted, owing to some previous + observations, which, however, were made under very unfavourable + circumstances. + </p> + <p> + [Digitalis purpurea. + </p> + <p> + The flowers of the common Foxglove are proterandrous; that is, the pollen + is mature and mostly shed before the stigma of the same flower is ready + for fertilisation. This is effected by the larger humble-bees, which, + whilst in search of nectar, carry pollen from flower to flower. The two + upper and longer stamens shed their pollen before the two lower and + shorter ones. The meaning of this fact probably is, as Dr. Ogle remarks, + that the anthers of the longer stamens stand near to the stigma, so that + they would be the most likely to fertilise it (3/3. ‘Popular Science + Review’ January 1870 page 50.); and as it is an advantage to avoid + self-fertilisation, they shed their pollen first, thus lessening the + chance. There is, however, but little danger of self-fertilisation until + the bifid stigma opens; for Hildebrand found that pollen placed on the + stigma before it had opened produced no effect. (3/4. + ‘Geschlechter-Vertheilung bei den Pflanzen’ 1867 page 20.) The anthers, + which are large, stand at first transversely with respect to the tubular + corolla, and if they were to dehisce in this position they would, as Dr. + Ogle also remarks, smear with pollen the whole back and sides of an + entering humble-bee in a useless manner; but the anthers twist round and + place themselves longitudinally before they dehisce. The lower and inner + side of the mouth of the corolla is thickly clothed with hairs, and these + collect so much of the fallen pollen that I have seen the under surface of + a humble-bee thickly dusted with it; but this can never be applied to the + stigma, as the bees in retreating do not turn their under surfaces + upwards. I was therefore puzzled whether these hairs were of any use; but + Mr. Belt has, I think, explained their use: the smaller kinds of bees are + not fitted to fertilise the flowers, and if they were allowed to enter + easily they would steal much nectar, and fewer large bees would haunt the + flowers. Humble-bees can crawl into the dependent flowers with the + greatest ease, using the “hairs as footholds while sucking the honey; but + the smaller bees are impeded by them, and when, having at length struggled + through them, they reach the slippery precipice above, they are completely + baffled.” Mr. Belt says that he watched many flowers during a whole season + in North Wales, and “only once saw a small bee reach the nectary, though + many were seen trying in vain to do so.” (3/5. ‘The Naturalist in + Nicaragua’ 1874 page 132. But it appears from H. Muller ‘Die Befruchtung + der Blumen’ 1873 page 285, that small insects sometimes succeed in + entering the flowers.) + </p> + <p> + I covered a plant growing in its native soil in North Wales with a net, + and fertilised six flowers each with its own pollen, and six others with + pollen from a distinct plant growing within the distance of a few feet. + The covered plant was occasionally shaken with violence, so as to imitate + the effects of a gale of wind, and thus to facilitate as far as possible + self-fertilisation. It bore ninety-two flowers (besides the dozen + artificially fertilised), and of these only twenty-four produced capsules; + whereas almost all the flowers on the surrounding uncovered plants were + fruitful. Of the twenty-four spontaneously self-fertilised capsules, only + two contained their full complement of seed; six contained a moderate + supply; and the remaining sixteen extremely few seeds. A little pollen + adhering to the anthers after they had dehisced, and accidentally falling + on the stigma when mature, must have been the means by which the above + twenty-four flowers were partially self-fertilised; for the margins of the + corolla in withering do not curl inwards, nor do the flowers in dropping + off turn round on their axes, so as to bring the pollen-covered hairs, + with which the lower surface is clothed, into contact with the stigma—by + either of which means self-fertilisation might be effected. + </p> + <p> + Seeds from the above crossed and self-fertilised capsules, after + germinating on bare sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of + five moderately-sized pots, which were kept in the greenhouse. The plants + after a time appeared starved, and were therefore, without being + disturbed, turned out of their pots, and planted in the open ground in two + close parallel rows. They were thus subjected to tolerably severe + competition with one another; but not nearly so severe as if they had been + left in the pots. At the time when they were turned out, their leaves were + between 5 and 8 inches in length, and the longest leaf on the finest plant + on each side of each pot was measured, with the result that the leaves of + the crossed plants exceeded, on an average, those of the self-fertilised + plants by .4 of an inch. + </p> + <p> + In the following summer the tallest flower-stem on each plant, when fully + grown, was measured. There were seventeen crossed plants; but one did not + produce a flower-stem. There were also, originally, seventeen + self-fertilised plants, but these had such poor constitutions that no less + than nine died in the course of the winter and spring, leaving only eight + to be measured, as in Table 3/23. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/23. Digitalis purpurea. + </p> + <p> + The tallest Flower-stem on each Plant measured in inches: 0 means that the + Plant died before a Flower-stem was produced. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 53 6/8 : 27 4/8. Pot 1 : 57 4/8 : 55 6/8. Pot 1 : 57 6/8 : 0. Pot + 1 : 65 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 34 4/8 : 39. Pot 2 : 52 4/8 : 32. Pot 2 : 63 6/8 : 21. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 57 4/8 : 53 4/8. Pot 3 : 53 4/8 : 0. Pot 3 : 50 6/8 : 0. Pot 3 : + 37 2/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 64 4/8 : 34 4/8. Pot 4 : 37 4/8 : 23 6/8. Pot 4 : — : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 53 : 0. Pot 5 : 47 6/8 : 0. Pot 5 : 34 6/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Total : 821.25 : 287.00. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the flower-stems of the sixteen crossed plants is + here 51.33 inches; and that of the eight self-fertilised plants, 35.87; or + as 100 to 70. But this difference in height does not give at all a fair + idea of the vast superiority of the crossed plants. These latter produced + altogether sixty-four flower-stems, each plant producing, on an average, + exactly four flower-stems, whereas the eight self-fertilised plants + produced only fifteen flower-stems, each producing an average only of 1.87 + stems, and these had a less luxuriant appearance. We may put the result in + another way: the number of flower-stems on the crossed plants was to those + on an equal number of self-fertilised plants as 100 to 48. + </p> + <p> + Three crossed seeds in a state of germination were also planted in three + separate pots; and three self-fertilised seeds in the same state in three + other pots. These plants were therefore at first exposed to no competition + with one another, and when turned out of their pots into the open ground + they were planted at a moderate distance apart, so that they were exposed + to much less severe competition than in the last case. The longest leaves + on the three crossed plants, when turned out, exceeded those on the + self-fertilised plants by a mere trifle, namely, on an average by .17 of + an inch. When fully grown the three crossed plants produced twenty-six + flower-stems; the two tallest of which on each plant were on an average + 54.04 inches in height. The three self-fertilised plants produced + twenty-three flower-stems, the two tallest of which on each plant had an + average height of 46.18 inches. So that the difference between these two + lots, which hardly competed together, is much less than in the last case + when there was moderately severe competition, namely, as 100 to 85, + instead of as 100 to 70. + </p> + <p> + THE EFFECTS ON THE OFFSPRING OF INTERCROSSING DIFFERENT FLOWERS ON THE + SAME PLANT, INSTEAD OF CROSSING DISTINCT INDIVIDUALS. + </p> + <p> + A fine plant growing in my garden (one of the foregoing seedlings) was + covered with a net, and six flowers were crossed with pollen from another + flower on the same plant, and six others were fertilised with their own + pollen. All produced good capsules. The seeds from each were placed in + separate watch-glasses, and no difference could be perceived by the eye + between the two lots of seeds; and when they were weighed there was no + difference of any significance, as the seeds from the self-fertilised + capsules weighed 7.65 grains, whilst those from the crossed capsules + weighed 7.7 grains. Therefore the sterility of the present species, when + insects are excluded, is not due to the impotence of pollen on the stigma + of the same flower. Both lots of seeds and seedlings were treated in + exactly the same manner as in Table 3/23, excepting that after the pairs + of germinating seeds had been planted on the opposite sides of eight pots, + all the remaining seeds were thickly sown on the opposite sides of Pots 9 + and 10 in Table 3/24. The young plants during the following spring were + turned out of their pots, without being disturbed, and planted in the open + ground in two rows, not very close together, so that they were subjected + to only moderately severe competition with one another. Very differently + to what occurred in the first experiment, when the plants were subjected + to somewhat severe mutual competition, an equal number on each side either + died or did not produce flower-stems. The tallest flower-stems on the + surviving plants were measured, as shown in Table 3/24. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/24. Digitalis purpurea. + </p> + <p> + The tallest Flower-stem on each Plant measured in inches: 0 signifies that + the Plant died, or did not produce a Flower-stem. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants raised from a Cross between different Flowers on the same + Plant. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Plants raised from Flowers fertilised with their own Pollen. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 49 4/8 : 45 5/8. Pot 1 : 46 7/8 : 52. Pot 1 : 43 6/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 38 4/8 : 54 4/8. Pot 2 : 47 4/8 : 47 4/8. Pot 2 : 0 : 32 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 54 7/8 : 46 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 32 1/8 : 41 3/8. Pot 4 : 0 : 29 7/8. Pot 4 : 43 7/8 : 37 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 46 6/8 : 42 1/8. Pot 5 : 40 4/8 : 42 1/8. Pot 5 : 43 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 48 2/8 : 47 7/8. Pot 6 : 46 2/8 : 48 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 48 5/8 : 25. Pot 7 : 42 : 40 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 46 7/8 : 39 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 9 : 49 : 30 3/8. Pot 9 : 50 3/8 : 15. Pot 9 : 46 3/8 : 36 7/8. Pot 9 : + 47 6/8 : 44 1/8. Pot 9 : 0 : 31 6/8. Crowded Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 10 : 46 4/8 : 47 7/8. Pot 10 : 35 2/8 : 0. Pot 10 : 24 5/8 : 34 7/8. + Pot 10 : 41 4/8 : 40 7/8. Pot 10 : 17 3/8 : 41 1/8. Crowded Plants. + </p> + <p> + Total : 1078.00 : 995.38. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the flower-stems on the twenty-five crossed plants + in all the pots taken together is 43.12 inches, and that of the + twenty-five self-fertilised plants 39.82, or as 100 to 92. In order to + test this result, the plants planted in pairs in Pots 1 and 8 were + considered by themselves, and the average height of the sixteen crossed + plants is here 44.9, and that of the sixteen self-fertilised plants 42.03, + or as 100 to 94. Again, the plants raised from the thickly sown seed in + Pots 9 and 10, which were subjected to very severe mutual competition, + were taken by themselves, and the average height of the nine crossed + plants is 39.86, and that of the nine self-fertilised plants 35.88, or as + 100 to 90. The plants in these two latter pots (9 and 10), after being + measured, were cut down close to the ground and weighed: the nine crossed + plants weighed 57.66 ounces, and the nine self-fertilised plants 45.25 + ounces, or as 100 to 78. On the whole we may conclude, especially from the + evidence of weight, that seedlings from a cross between flowers on the + same plant have a decided, though not great, advantage over those from + flowers fertilised with their own pollen, more especially in the case of + the plants subjected to severe mutual competition. But the advantage is + much less than that exhibited by the crossed offspring of distinct plants, + for these exceeded the self-fertilised plants in height as 100 to 70, and + in the number of flower-stems as 100 to 48. Digitalis thus differs from + Ipomoea, and almost certainly from Mimulus, as with these two species a + cross between flowers on the same plant did no good. + </p> + <h3> + CALCEOLARIA. + </h3> + <h3> + A BUSHY GREENHOUSE VARIETY, WITH YELLOW FLOWERS BLOTCHED WITH PURPLE. + </h3> + <p> + The flowers in this genus are constructed so as to favour or almost ensure + cross-fertilisation (3/6. Hildebrand as quoted by H. Muller ‘Die + Befruchtung der Blumen’ 1873 page 277.); and Mr. Anderson remarks that + extreme care is necessary to exclude insects in order to preserve any kind + true. (3/7. ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1853 page 534.) He adds the interesting + statement, that when the corolla is cut quite away, insects, as far as he + has seen, never discover or visit the flowers. This plant is, however, + self-fertile if insects are excluded. So few experiments were made by me, + that they are hardly worth giving. Crossed and self-fertilised seeds were + sown on opposite sides of a pot, and after a time the crossed seedlings + slightly exceeded the self-fertilised in height. When a little further + grown, the longest leaves on the former were very nearly 3 inches in + length, whilst those on the self-fertilised plants were only 2 inches. + Owing to an accident, and to the pot being too small, only one plant on + each side grew up and flowered; the crossed plant was 19 1/2 inches in + height, and the self-fertilised one 15 inches; or as 100 to 77. + </p> + <p> + Linaria vulgaris. + </p> + <p> + It has been mentioned in the introductory chapter that two large beds of + this plant were raised by me many years ago from crossed and + self-fertilised seeds, and that there was a conspicuous difference in + height and general appearance between the two lots. The trial was + afterwards repeated with more care; but as this was one of the first + plants experimented on, my usual method was not followed. Seeds were taken + from wild plants growing in this neighbourhood and sown in poor soil in my + garden. Five plants were covered with a net, the others being left exposed + to the bees, which incessantly visit the flowers of this species, and + which, according to H. Muller, are the exclusive fertilisers. This + excellent observer remarks that, as the stigma lies between the anthers + and is mature at the same time with them, self-fertilisation is possible. + (3/8. ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. page 279.) But so few seeds are produced by + protected plants, that the pollen and stigma of the same flower seem to + have little power of mutual interaction. The exposed plants bore numerous + capsules forming solid spikes. Five of these capsules were examined and + appeared to contain an equal number of seeds; and these being counted in + one capsule, were found to be 166. The five protected plants produced + altogether only twenty-five capsules, of which five were much finer than + all the others, and these contained an average of 23.6 seeds, with a + maximum in one capsule of fifty-five. So that the number of seeds in the + capsules on the exposed plants to the average number in the finest + capsules on the protected plants was as 100 to 14. + </p> + <p> + Some of the spontaneously self-fertilised seeds from under the net, and + some seeds from the uncovered plants naturally fertilised and almost + certainly intercrossed by the bees, were sown separately in two large pots + of the same size; so that the two lots of seedlings were not subjected to + any mutual competition. Three of the crossed plants when in full flower + were measured, but no care was taken to select the tallest plants; their + heights were 7 4/8, 7 2/8, and 6 4/8 inches; averaging 7.08 in height. The + three tallest of all the self-fertilised plants were then carefully + selected, and their heights were 6 3/8, 5 5/8, and 5 2/8, averaging 5.75 + in height. So that the naturally crossed plants were to the spontaneously + self-fertilised plants in height, at least as much as 100 to 81. + </p> + <p> + Verbascum thapsus. + </p> + <p> + The flowers of this plant are frequented by various insects, chiefly by + bees, for the sake of the pollen. Hermann Muller, however, has shown (‘Die + Befruchtung’ etc. page 277) that V. nigrum secretes minute drops of + nectar. The arrangement of the reproductive organs, though not at all + complex, favours cross-fertilisation; and even distinct species are often + crossed, for a greater number of naturally produced hybrids have been + observed in this genus than in almost any other. (3/9. I have given a + striking case of a large number of such hybrids between Verbascum thapsus + and lychnitis found growing wild: ‘Journal of Linnean Society Botany’ + volume 10 page 451.) Nevertheless the present species is perfectly + self-fertile, if insects are excluded; for a plant protected by a net was + as thickly loaded with fine capsules as the surrounding uncovered plants. + Verbascum lychnitis is rather less self-fertile, for some protected plants + did not yield quite so many capsules as the adjoining uncovered plants. + </p> + <p> + Plants of Verbascum thapsus had been raised for a distinct purpose from + self-fertilised seeds; and some flowers on these plants were again + self-fertilised, yielding seed of the second self-fertilised generation; + and other flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant. The + seeds thus produced were sown on the opposite sides of four large pots. + They germinated, however, so irregularly (the crossed seedlings generally + coming up first) that I was able to save only six pairs of equal age. + These when in full flower were measured, as in Table 3/25. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/25. Verbascum thapsus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants of the Second Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 76 : 53 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 54 : 66. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 62 : 75. Pot 3 : 60 5/8 : 30 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 73 : 62. Pot 4 : 66 4/8 : 52. + </p> + <p> + Total : 392.13 : 339.00. + </p> + <p> + We here see that two of the self-fertilised plants exceed in height their + crossed opponents. Nevertheless the average height of the six crossed + plants is 65.34 inches, and that of the six self-fertilised plants 56.5 + inches; or as 100 to 86. + </p> + <p> + Vandellia nummularifolia. + </p> + <p> + Seeds were sent to me by Mr. J. Scott from Calcutta of this small Indian + weed, which bears perfect and cleistogene flowers. (3/10. The convenient + term of CLEISTOGENE was proposed by Kuhn in an article on the present + genus in ‘Bot. Zeitung’ 1867 page 65.) The latter are extremely small, + imperfectly developed, and never expand, yet yield plenty of seeds. The + perfect and open flowers are also small, of a white colour with purple + marks; they generally produce seed, although the contrary has been + asserted; and they do so even if protected from insects. They have a + rather complicated structure, and appear to be adapted for + cross-fertilisation, but were not carefully examined by me. They are not + easy to fertilise artificially, and it is possible that some of the + flowers which I thought that I had succeeded in crossing were afterwards + spontaneously self-fertilised under the net. Sixteen capsules from the + crossed perfect flowers contained on an average ninety-three seeds (with a + maximum in one capsule of 137), and thirteen capsules from the + self-fertilised perfect flowers contained sixty-two seeds (with a maximum + in one capsule of 135); or as 100 to 67. But I suspect that this + considerable excess was accidental, as on one occasion nine crossed + capsules were compared with seven self-fertilised capsules (both included + in the above number), and they contained almost exactly the same average + number of seed. I may add that fifteen capsules from self-fertilised + cleistogene flowers contained on an average sixty-four seeds, with a + maximum in one of eighty-seven. + </p> + <p> + Crossed and self-fertilised seeds from the perfect flowers, and other + seeds from the self-fertilised cleistogene flowers, were sown in five + pots, each divided superficially into three compartments. The seedlings + were thinned at an early age, so that twenty plants were left in each of + the three divisions. The crossed plants when in full flower averaged 4.3 + inches, and the self-fertilised plants from the perfect flowers 4.27 + inches in height; or as 100 to 99. The self-fertilised plants from the + cleistogene flowers averaged 4.06 inches in height; so that the crossed + were in height to these latter plants as 100 to 94. + </p> + <p> + I determined to compare again the growth of plants raised from crossed and + self-fertilised perfect flowers, and obtained two fresh lots of seeds. + These were sown on opposite sides of five pots, but they were not + sufficiently thinned, so that they grew rather crowded. When fully grown, + all those above 2 inches in height were selected, all below this standard + being rejected; the former consisted of forty-seven crossed and forty-one + self-fertilised plants; thus a greater number of the crossed than of the + self-fertilised plants grew to a height of above 2 inches. Of the crossed + plants, the twenty-four tallest were on an average 3.6 inches in height; + whilst the twenty-four tallest self-fertilised plants were 3.38 inches in + average height; or as 100 to 94. All these plants were then cut down close + to the ground, and the forty-seven crossed plants weighed 1090.3 grains, + and the forty-one self-fertilised plants weighed 887.4 grains. Therefore + an equal number of crossed and self-fertilised would have been to each + other in weight as 100 to 97. From these several facts we may conclude + that the crossed plants had some real, though very slight, advantage in + height and weight over the self-fertilised plants, when grown in + competition with one another. + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants were, however, inferior in fertility to the + self-fertilised. Six of the finest plants were selected out of the + forty-seven crossed plants, and six out of the forty-one self-fertilised + plants; and the former produced 598 capsules, whilst the latter or + self-fertilised plants produced 752 capsules. All these capsules were the + product of cleistogene flowers, for the plants did not bear during the + whole of this season any perfect flowers. The seeds were counted in ten + cleistogene capsules produced by crossed plants, and their average number + was 46.4 per capsule; whilst the number in ten cleistogene capsules + produced by the self-fertilised plants was 49.4; or as 100 to 106. + </p> + <p> + 3. GESNERIACEAE.—Gesneria pendulina. + </p> + <p> + In Gesneria the several parts of the flower are arranged on nearly the + same plan as in Digitalis, and most or all of the species are dichogamous. + (3/11. Dr. Ogle ‘Popular Science Review’ January 1870 page 51.) Plants + were raised from seed sent me by Fritz Muller from South Brazil. Seven + flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant, and produced seven + capsules containing by weight 3.01 grains of seeds. Seven flowers on the + same plants were fertilised with their own pollen, and their seven + capsules contained exactly the same weight of seeds. Germinating seeds + were planted on opposite sides of four pots, and when fully grown measured + to the tips of their leaves. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/26. Gesneria pendulina. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 42 2/8 : 39. Pot 1 : 24 4/8 : 27 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 33 : 30 6/8. Pot 2 : 27 : 19 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 33 4/8 : 31 7/8. Pot 3 : 29 4/8 : 28 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 30 6/8 : 29 6/8. Pot 4 : 36 : 26 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 256.50 : 233.13. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the eight crossed plants is 32.06 inches, and that + of the eight self-fertilised plants 29.14; or as 100 to 90. + </p> + <p> + 4. LABIATAE.—Salvia coccinea. (3/12. The admirable mechanical + adaptations in this genus for favouring or ensuring cross-fertilisation, + have been fully described by Sprengel, Hildebrand, Delpino, H. Muller, + Ogle, and others, in their several works.) + </p> + <p> + This species, unlike most of the others in the same genus, yields a good + many seeds when insects are excluded. I gathered ninety-eight capsules + produced by flowers spontaneously self-fertilised under a net, and they + contained on an average 1.45 seeds, whilst flowers artificially fertilised + with their own pollen, in which case the stigma will have received plenty + of pollen, yielded on an average 3.3 seeds, or more than twice as many. + Twenty flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant, and + twenty-six were self-fertilised. There was no great difference in the + proportional number of flowers which produced capsules by these two + processes, or in the number of the contained seeds, or in the weight of an + equal number of seeds. + </p> + <p> + Seeds of both kinds were sown rather thickly on opposite sides of three + pots. When the seedlings were about 3 inches in height, the crossed showed + a slight advantage over the self-fertilised. When two-thirds grown, the + two tallest plants on each side of each pot were measured; the crossed + averaged 16.37 inches, and the self-fertilised 11.75 in height; or as 100 + to 71. When the plants were fully grown and had done flowering, the two + tallest plants on each side were again measured, with the results shown in + Table 3/27. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/27. Salvia coccinea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 32 6/8 : 25. Pot 1 : 20 : 18 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 32 3/8 : 20 6/8. Pot 2 : 24 4/8 : 19 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 29 4/8 : 25. Pot 3 : 28 : 18. + </p> + <p> + Total : 167.13 : 127.00. + </p> + <p> + It may be here seen that each of the six tallest crossed plants exceeds in + height its self-fertilised opponent; the former averaged 27.85 inches, + whilst the six tallest self-fertilised plants averaged 21.16 inches; or as + 100 to 76. In all three pots the first plant which flowered was a crossed + one. All the crossed plants together produced 409 flowers, whilst all the + self-fertilised together produced only 232 flowers; or as 100 to 57. So + that the crossed plants in this respect were far more productive than the + self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Origanum vulgare. + </p> + <p> + This plant exists, according to H. Muller, under two forms; one + hermaphrodite and strongly proterandrous, so that it is almost certain to + be fertilised by pollen from another flower; the other form is exclusively + female, has a smaller corolla, and must of course be fertilised by pollen + from a distinct plant in order to yield any seeds. The plants on which I + experimented were hermaphrodites; they had been cultivated for a long + period as a pot-herb in my kitchen garden, and were, like so many + long-cultivated plants, extremely sterile. As I felt doubtful about the + specific name I sent specimens to Kew, and was assured that the species + was Origanum vulgare. My plants formed one great clump, and had evidently + spread from a single root by stolons. In a strict sense, therefore, they + all belonged to the same individual. My object in experimenting on them + was, firstly, to ascertain whether crossing flowers borne by plants having + distinct roots, but all derived asexually from the same individual, would + be in any respect more advantageous than self-fertilisation; and, + secondly, to raise for future trial seedlings which would constitute + really distinct individuals. Several plants in the above clump were + covered by a net, and about two dozen seeds (many of which, however, were + small and withered) were obtained from the flowers thus spontaneously + self-fertilised. The remainder of the plants were left uncovered and were + incessantly visited by bees, so that they were doubtless crossed by them. + These exposed plants yielded rather more and finer seed (but still very + few) than did the covered plants. The two lots of seeds thus obtained were + sown on opposite sides of two pots; the seedlings were carefully observed + from their first growth to maturity, but they did not differ at any period + in height or in vigour, the importance of which latter observation we + shall presently see. When fully grown, the tallest crossed plant in one + pot was a very little taller than the tallest self-fertilised plant on the + opposite side, and in the other pot exactly the reverse occurred. So that + the two lots were in fact equal; and a cross of this kind did no more good + than crossing two flowers on the same plant of Ipomoea or Mimulus. + </p> + <p> + The plants were turned out of the two pots without being disturbed and + planted in the open ground, in order that they might grow more vigorously. + In the following summer all the self-fertilised and some of the + quasi-crossed plants were covered by a net. Many flowers on the latter + were crossed by me with pollen from a distinct plant, and others were left + to be crossed by the bees. These quasi-crossed plants produced rather more + seed than did the original ones in the great clump when left to the action + of the bees. Many flowers on the self-fertilised plants were artificially + self-fertilised, and others were allowed to fertilise themselves + spontaneously under the net, but they yielded altogether very few seeds. + These two lots of seeds—the product of a cross between distinct + seedlings, instead of as in the last case between plants multiplied by + stolons, and the product of self-fertilised flowers—were allowed to + germinate on bare sand, and several equal pairs were planted on opposite + sides of two LARGE pots. At a very early age the crossed plants showed + some superiority over the self-fertilised, which was ever afterwards + retained. When the plants were fully grown, the two tallest crossed and + the two tallest self-fertilised plants in each pot were measured, as shown + in Table 3/28. I regret that from want of time I did not measure all the + pairs; but the tallest on each side seemed fairly to represent the average + difference between the two lots. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/28. Origanum vulgare. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants (two tallest in each pot). + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants (two tallest in each pot). + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 26 : 24. Pot 1 : 21 : 21. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 17 : 12. Pot 2 : 16 : 11 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 80.0 : 68.5. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the crossed plants is here 20 inches, and that of + the self-fertilised 17.12; or as 100 to 86. But this excess of height by + no means gives a fair idea of the vast superiority in vigour of the + crossed over the self-fertilised plants. The crossed flowered first and + produced thirty flower-stems, whilst the self-fertilised produced only + fifteen, or half the number. The pots were then bedded out, and the roots + probably came out of the holes at the bottom and thus aided their growth. + Early in the following summer the superiority of the crossed plants, owing + to their increase by stolons, over the self-fertilised plants was truly + wonderful. In Pot 1, and it should be remembered that very large pots had + been used, the oval clump of crossed plants was 10 by 4 1/2 inches across, + with the tallest stem, as yet young, 5 1/2 inches in height; whilst the + clump of self-fertilised plants, on the opposite side of the same pot, was + only 3 1/2 by 2 1/2 inches across, with the tallest young stem 4 inches in + height. In Pot 2, the clump of crossed plants was 18 by 9 inches across, + with the tallest young stem 8 1/2 inches in height; whilst the clump of + self-fertilised plants on the opposite side of the same pot was 12 by 4 + 1/2 inches across, with the tallest young stem 6 inches in height. The + crossed plants during this season, as during the last, flowered first. + Both the crossed and self-fertilised plants being left freely exposed to + the visits of bees, manifestly produced much more seed than their + grand-parents,—the plants of the original clump still growing close + by in the same garden, and equally left to the action of the bees. + </p> + <p> + 5. ACANTHACEAE.—Thunbergia alata. + </p> + <p> + It appears from Hildebrand’s description (‘Botanische Zeitung’ 1867 page + 285) that the conspicuous flowers of this plant are adapted for + cross-fertilisation. Seedlings were twice raised from purchased seed; but + during the early summer, when first experimented on, they were extremely + sterile, many of the anthers containing hardly any pollen. Nevertheless, + during the autumn these same plants spontaneously produced a good many + seeds. Twenty-six flowers during the two years were crossed with pollen + from a distinct plant, but they yielded only eleven capsules; and these + contained very few seeds! Twenty-eight flowers were fertilised with pollen + from the same flower, and these yielded only ten capsules, which, however, + contained rather more seed than the crossed capsules. Eight pairs of + germinating seeds were planted on opposite sides of five pots; and exactly + half the crossed and half the self-fertilised plants exceeded their + opponents in height. Two of the self-fertilised plants died young, before + they were measured, and their crossed opponents were thrown away. The six + remaining pairs of these grew very unequally, some, both of the crossed + and self-fertilised plants, being more than twice as tall as the others. + The average height of the crossed plants was 60 inches, and that of the + self-fertilised plants 65 inches, or as 100 to 108. A cross, therefore, + between distinct individuals here appears to do no good; but this result + deduced from so few plants in a very sterile condition and growing very + unequally, obviously cannot be trusted.] + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0004" id="link2HCH0004"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER IV. CRUCIFERAE, PAPAVERACEAE, RESEDACEAE, ETC. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Brassica oleracea, crossed and self-fertilised plants. + Great effect of a cross with a fresh stock on the weight of the + offspring. + Iberis umbellata. + Papaver vagum. + Eschscholtzia californica, seedlings from a cross with a fresh stock not + more vigorous, but more fertile than the self-fertilised seedlings. + Reseda lutea and odorata, many individuals sterile with their own pollen. + Viola tricolor, wonderful effects of a cross. + Adonis aestivalis. + Delphinium consolida. + Viscaria oculata, crossed plants hardly taller, but more fertile than + the self-fertilised. + Dianthus caryophyllus, crossed and self-fertilised plants compared for + four generations. + Great effects of a cross with a fresh stock. + Uniform colour of the flowers on the self-fertilised plants. + Hibiscus africanus. +</pre> + <p> + [6. CRUCIFERAE.—Brassica oleracea. + </p> + <h3> + VAR. CATTELL’S EARLY BARNES CABBAGE. + </h3> + <p> + The flowers of the common cabbage are adapted, as shown by H. Muller, for + cross-fertilisation, and should this fail, for self-fertilisation. (4/1. + ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. page 139.) It is well known that the varieties are + crossed so largely by insects, that it is impossible to raise pure kinds + in the same garden, if more than one kind is in flower at the same time. + Cabbages, in one respect, were not well fitted for my experiments, as, + after they had formed heads, they were often difficult to measure. The + flower-stems also differ much in height; and a poor plant will sometimes + throw up a higher stem than that of a fine plant. In the later + experiments, the fully-grown plants were cut down and weighed, and then + the immense advantage from a cross became manifest. + </p> + <p> + A single plant of the above variety was covered with a net just before + flowering, and was crossed with pollen from another plant of the same + variety growing close by; and the seven capsules thus produced contained + on an average 16.3 seeds, with a maximum of twenty in one capsule. Some + flowers were artificially self-fertilised, but their capsules did not + contain so many seeds as those from flowers spontaneously self-fertilised + under the net, of which a considerable number were produced. Fourteen of + these latter capsules contained on an average 4.1 seeds, with a maximum in + one of ten seeds; so that the seeds in the crossed capsules were in number + to those in the self-fertilised capsules as 100 to 25. The self-fertilised + seeds, fifty-eight of which weighed 3.88 grains, were, however, a little + finer than those from the crossed capsules, fifty-eight of which weighed + 3.76 grains. When few seeds are produced, these seem often to be better + nourished and to be heavier than when many are produced. + </p> + <p> + The two lots of seeds in an equal state of germination were planted, some + on opposite sides of a single pot, and some in the open ground. The young + crossed plants in the pot at first exceeded by a little in height the + self-fertilised; then equalled them; were then beaten; and lastly were + again victorious. The plants, without being disturbed, were turned out of + the pot, and planted in the open ground; and after growing for some time, + the crossed plants, which were all of nearly the same height, exceeded the + self-fertilised ones by 2 inches. When they flowered, the flower-stems of + the tallest crossed plant exceeded that of the tallest self-fertilised + plant by 6 inches. The other seedlings which were planted in the open + ground stood separate, so that they did not compete with one another; + nevertheless the crossed plants certainly grew to a rather greater height + than the self-fertilised; but no measurements were made. The crossed + plants which had been raised in the pot, and those planted in the open + ground, all flowered a little before the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Some flowers on the crossed plants of the last generation were again + crossed with pollen from another crossed plant, and produced fine + capsules. The flowers on the self-fertilised plants of the last generation + were allowed to fertilise themselves spontaneously under a net, and they + produced some remarkably fine capsules. The two lots of seeds thus + produced germinated on sand, and eight pairs were planted on opposite + sides of four pots. These plants were measured to the tips of their leaves + on the 20th of October of the same year, and the eight crossed plants + averaged in height 8.4 inches, whilst the self-fertilised averaged 8.53 + inches, so that the crossed were a little inferior in height, as 100 to + 101.5. By the 5th of June of the following year these plants had grown + much bulkier, and had begun to form heads. The crossed had now acquired a + marked superiority in general appearance, and averaged 8.02 inches in + height, whilst the self-fertilised averaged 7.31 inches; or as 100 to 91. + The plants were then turned out of their pots and planted undisturbed in + the open ground. By the 5th of August their heads were fully formed, but + several had grown so crooked that their heights could hardly be measured + with accuracy. The crossed plants, however, were on the whole considerably + taller than the self-fertilised. In the following year they flowered; the + crossed plants flowering before the self-fertilised in three of the pots, + and at the same time in Pot 2. The flower-stems were now measured, as + shown in Table 4/29. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/29. Brassica oleracea. + </p> + <p> + Measured in inches to tops of flower-stems: 0 signifies that a Flower-stem + was not formed. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 49 2/8 : 44. Pot 1 : 39 4/8 : 41. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 37 4/8 : 38. Pot 2 : 33 4/8 : 35 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 47 : 51 1/8. Pot 3 : 40 : 41 2/8. Pot 3 : 42 : 46 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 43 6/8 : 20 2/8. Pot 4 : 37 2/8 : 33 3/8. Pot 4 : 0 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Total : 369.75 : 351.00. + </p> + <p> + The nine flower-stems on the crossed plants here average 41.08 inches, and + the nine on the self-fertilised plants 39 inches in height, or as 100 to + 95. But this small difference, which, moreover, depended almost wholly on + one of the self-fertilised plants being only 20 inches high, does not in + the least show the vast superiority of the crossed over the + self-fertilised plants. Both lots, including the two plants in Pot 4, + which did not flower, were now cut down close to the ground and weighed, + but those in Pot 2 were excluded, for they had been accidentally injured + by a fall during transplantation, and one was almost killed. The eight + crossed plants weighed 219 ounces, whilst the eight self-fertilised plants + weighed only 82 ounces, or as 100 to 37; so that the superiority of the + former over the latter in weight was great. + </p> + <h3> + THE EFFECTS OF A CROSS WITH A FRESH STOCK. + </h3> + <p> + Some flowers on a crossed plant of the last or second generation were + fertilised, without being castrated, by pollen taken from a plant of the + same variety, but not related to my plants, and brought from a nursery + garden (whence my seeds originally came) having a different soil and + aspect. The flowers on the self-fertilised plants of the last or second + generation (Table 4/29) were allowed to fertilise themselves spontaneously + under a net, and yielded plenty of seeds. These latter and the crossed + seeds, after germinating on sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite + sides of six large pots, which were kept at first in a cool greenhouse. + Early in January their heights were measured to the tips of their leaves. + The thirteen crossed plants averaged 13.16 inches in height, and the + twelve (for one had died) self-fertilised plants averaged 13.7 inches, or + as 100 to 104; so that the self-fertilised plants exceeded by a little the + crossed plants. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 3/30. Brassica oleracea. + </p> + <p> + Weights in ounces of plants after they had formed heads. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants from Pollen of fresh Stock. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants of the Third Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 130 : 18 2/4. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 74 : 34 3/4. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 121 : 17 2/4. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 127 2/4 : 14. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 90 : 11 2/4. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 106 2/4 : 46. + </p> + <p> + Total : 649.00 : 142.25. + </p> + <p> + Early in the spring the plants were gradually hardened, and turned out of + their pots into the open ground without being disturbed. By the end of + August the greater number had formed fine heads, but several grew + extremely crooked, from having been drawn up to the light whilst in the + greenhouse. As it was scarcely possible to measure their heights, the + finest plant on each side of each pot was cut down close to the ground and + weighed. In Table 4/30 we have the result. + </p> + <p> + The six finest crossed plants average 108.16 ounces, whilst the six finest + self-fertilised plants average only 23.7 ounces, or as 100 to 22. This + difference shows in the clearest manner the enormous benefit which these + plants derived from a cross with another plant belonging to the same + sub-variety, but to a fresh stock, and grown during at least the three + previous generations under somewhat different conditions. + </p> + <p> + THE OFFSPRING FROM A CUT-LEAVED, CURLED, AND VARIEGATED WHITE-GREEN + CABBAGE CROSSED WITH A CUT-LEAVED, CURLED, AND VARIEGATED CRIMSON-GREEN + CABBAGE, COMPARED WITH THE SELF-FERTILISED OFFSPRING FROM THE TWO + VARIETIES. + </p> + <p> + These trials were made, not for the sake of comparing the growth of the + crossed and self-fertilised seedlings, but because I had seen it stated + that these varieties would not naturally intercross when growing uncovered + and near one another. This statement proved quite erroneous; but the + white-green variety was in some degree sterile in my garden, producing + little pollen and few seeds. It was therefore no wonder that seedlings + raised from the self-fertilised flowers of this variety were greatly + exceeded in height by seedlings from a cross between it and the more + vigorous crimson-green variety; and nothing more need be said about this + experiment. + </p> + <p> + The seedlings from the reciprocal cross, that is, from the crimson-green + variety fertilised with pollen from the white-green variety, offer a + somewhat more curious case. A few of these crossed seedlings reverted to a + pure green variety with their leaves less cut and curled, so that they + were altogether in a much more natural state, and these plants grew more + vigorously and taller than any of the others. Now it is a strange fact + that a much larger number of the self-fertilised seedlings from the + crimson-green variety than of the crossed seedlings thus reverted; and as + a consequence the self-fertilised seedlings grew taller by 2 1/2 inches on + an average than the crossed seedlings, with which they were put into + competition. At first, however, the crossed seedlings exceeded the + self-fertilised by an average of a quarter of an inch. We thus see that + reversion to a more natural condition acted more powerfully in favouring + the ultimate growth of these plants than did a cross; but it should be + remembered that the cross was with a semi-sterile variety having a feeble + constitution. + </p> + <p> + Iberis umbellata. + </p> + <h3> + VAR. KERMESIANA. + </h3> + <p> + This variety produced plenty of spontaneously self-fertilised seed under a + net. Other plants in pots in the greenhouse were left uncovered, and as I + saw small flies visiting the flowers, it seemed probable that they would + be intercrossed. Consequently seeds supposed to have been thus crossed and + spontaneously self-fertilised seeds were sown on opposite sides of a pot. + The self-fertilised seedlings grew from the first quicker than the + supposed crossed seedlings, and when both lots were in full flower the + former were from 5 to 6 inches higher than the crossed! I record in my + notes that the self-fertilised seeds from which these self-fertilised + plants were raised were not so well ripened as the crossed; and this may + possibly have caused the great difference in their growth, in a somewhat + analogous manner as occurred with the self-fertilised plants of the eighth + generation of Ipomoea raised from unhealthy parents. It is a curious + circumstance, that two other lots of the above seeds were sown in pure + sand mixed with burnt earth, and therefore without any organic matter; and + here the supposed crossed seedlings grew to double the height of the + self-fertilised, before both lots died, as necessarily occurred at an + early period. We shall hereafter meet with another case apparently + analogous to this of Iberis in the third generation of Petunia. + </p> + <p> + The above self-fertilised plants were allowed to fertilise themselves + again under a net, yielding self-fertilised plants of the second + generation, and the supposed crossed plants were crossed by pollen of a + distinct plant; but from want of time this was done in a careless manner, + namely, by smearing one head of expanded flowers over another. I should + have thought that this would have succeeded, and perhaps it did so; but + the fact of 108 of the self-fertilised seeds weighing 4.87 grains, whilst + the same number of the supposed crossed seeds weighed only 3.57 grains, + does not look like it. Five seedlings from each lot of seeds were raised, + and the self-fertilised plants, when fully grown, exceeded in average + height by a trifle (namely .4 of an inch) the five probably crossed + plants. I have thought it right to give this case and the last, because + had the supposed crossed plants proved superior to the self-fertilised in + height, I should have assumed without doubt that the former had really + been crossed. As it is, I do not know what to conclude. + </p> + <p> + Being much surprised at the two foregoing trials, I determined to make + another, in which there should be no doubt about the crossing. I therefore + fertilised with great care (but as usual without castration) twenty-four + flowers on the supposed crossed plants of the last generation with pollen + from distinct plants, and thus obtained twenty-one capsules. The + self-fertilised plants of the last generation were allowed to fertilise + themselves again under a net, and the seedlings reared from these seeds + formed the third self-fertilised generation. Both lots of seeds, after + germinating on bare sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of + two pots. All the remaining seeds were sown crowded on opposite sides of a + third pot; but as all the self-fertilised seedlings in this latter pot + died before they grew to any considerable height, they were not measured. + The plants in Pots 1 and 2 were measured when between 7 and 8 inches in + height, and the crossed exceeded the self-fertilised in average height by + 1.57 inches. When fully grown they were again measured to the summits of + their flower-heads, with the following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/31. Iberis umbellata. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants to the summits of their flower-heads, in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants of the Third Generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 18 : 19. Pot 1 : 21 : 21. Pot 1 : 18 2/8 : 19 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 19 : 16 6/8. Pot 2 : 18 4/8 : 7 4/8. Pot 2 : 17 6/8 : 14 4/8. Pot + 2 : 21 3/8 : 16 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 133.88 : 114.75. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the seven crossed plants is here 19.12 inches, and + that of the seven self-fertilised plants 16.39, or as 100 to 86. But as + the plants on the self-fertilised side grew very unequally, this ratio + cannot be fully trusted, and is probably too high. In both pots a crossed + plant flowered before any one of the self-fertilised. These plants were + left uncovered in the greenhouse; but from being too much crowded they + were not very productive. The seeds from all seven plants of both lots + were counted; the crossed produced 206, and the self-fertilised 154; or as + 100 to 75. + </p> + <h3> + CROSS BY A FRESH STOCK. + </h3> + <p> + From the doubts caused by the two first trials, in which it was not known + with certainty that the plants had been crossed; and from the crossed + plants in the last experiment having been put into competition with plants + self-fertilised for three generations, which moreover grew very unequally, + I resolved to repeat the trial on a larger scale, and in a rather + different manner. I obtained seeds of the same crimson variety of Iberis + umbellata from another nursery garden, and raised plants from them. Some + of these plants were allowed to fertilise themselves spontaneously under a + net; others were crossed by pollen taken from plants raised from seed sent + me by Dr. Durando from Algiers, where the parent-plants had been + cultivated for some generations. These latter plants differed in having + pale pink instead of crimson flowers, but in no other respect. That the + cross had been effective (though the flowers on the crimson mother-plant + had NOT been castrated) was well shown when the thirty crossed seedlings + flowered, for twenty-four of them produced pale pink flowers, exactly like + those of their father; the six others having crimson flowers exactly like + those of their mother and like those of all the self-fertilised seedlings. + This case offers a good instance of a result which not rarely follows from + crossing varieties having differently coloured flowers; namely, that the + colours do not blend, but resemble perfectly those either of the father or + mother plant. The seeds of both lots, after germinating on sand, were + planted on opposite sides of eight pots. When fully grown, the plants were + measured to the summits of the flower-heads, as shown in Table 4/32. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/32. Iberis umbellata. + </p> + <p> + Height of Plants to the summits of the flower-heads, measured in inches: 0 + signifies that the Plant died. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants from a Cross with a fresh Stock. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Plants from Spontaneously Self-fertilised Seeds. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 18 6/8 : 17 3/8. Pot 1 : 17 5/8 : 16 7/8. Pot 1 : 17 6/8 : 13 1/8. + Pot 1 : 20 1/8 : 15 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 20 2/8 : 0. Pot 2 : 15 7/8 : 16 6/8. Pot 2 : 17 : 15 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 19 2/8 : 13 6/8. Pot 3 : 18 1/8 : 14 2/8. Pot 3 : 15 2/8 : 13 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 17 1/8 : 16 4/8. Pot 4 : 18 7/8 : 14 4/8. Pot 4 : 17 5/8 : 16. Pot + 4 : 15 6/8 : 15 3/8. Pot 4 : 14 4/8 : 14 7/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 18 1/8 : 16 4/8. Pot 5 : 14 7/8 : 16 2/8. Pot 5 : 16 2/8 : 14 2/8. + Pot 5 : 15 5/8 : 14 2/8. Pot 5 : 12 4/8 : 16 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 18 6/8 : 16 1/8. Pot 6 : 18 6/8 : 15. Pot 6 : 17 3/8 : 15 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 18 : 16 3/8. Pot 7 : 16 4/8 : 14 4/8. Pot 7 : 18 2/8 : 13 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 20 6/8 : 15 6/8. Pot 8 : 17 7/8 : 16 3/8. Pot 8 : 13 5/8 : 20 2/8. + Pot 8 : 19 2/8 : 15 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 520.38 : 449.88. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the thirty crossed plants is here 17.34, and that of + the twenty-nine self-fertilised plants (one having died) 15.51, or as 100 + to 89. I am surprised that the difference did not prove somewhat greater, + considering that in the last experiment it was as 100 to 86; but this + latter ratio, as before explained, was probably too great. It should, + however, be observed that in the last experiment (Table 4/31), the crossed + plants competed with plants of the third self-fertilised generation; + whilst in the present case, plants derived from a cross with a fresh stock + competed with self-fertilised plants of the first generation. + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants in the present case, as in the last, were more fertile + than the self-fertilised, both lots being left uncovered in the + greenhouse. The thirty crossed plants produced 103 seed-bearing + flowers-heads, as well as some heads which yielded no seeds; whereas the + twenty-nine self-fertilised plants produced only 81 seed-bearing heads; + therefore thirty such plants would have produced 83.7 heads. We thus get + the ratio of 100 to 81, for the number of seed-bearing flower-heads + produced by the crossed and self-fertilised plants. Moreover, a number of + seed-bearing heads from the crossed plants, compared with the same number + from the self-fertilised, yielded seeds by weight, in the ratio of 100 to + 92. Combining these two elements, namely, the number of seed-bearing heads + and the weight of seeds in each head, the productiveness of the crossed to + the self-fertilised plants was as 100 to 75. + </p> + <p> + The crossed and self-fertilised seeds, which remained after the above + pairs had been planted, (some in a state of germination and some not so), + were sown early in the year out of doors in two rows. Many of the + self-fertilised seedlings suffered greatly, and a much larger number of + them perished than of the crossed. In the autumn the surviving + self-fertilised plants were plainly less well-grown than the crossed + plants. + </p> + <p> + 7. PAPAVERACEAE.—Papaver vagum. + </p> + <p> + A SUB-SPECIES OF Papaver dubium, FROM THE SOUTH OF FRANCE. + </p> + <p> + The poppy does not secrete nectar, but the flowers are highly conspicuous + and are visited by many pollen-collecting bees, flies and beetles. The + anthers shed their pollen very early, and in the case of Papaver rhoeas, + it falls on the circumference of the radiating stigmas, so that this + species must often be self-fertilised; but with Papaver dubium the same + result does not follow (according to H. Muller ‘Die Befruchtung’ page + 128), owing to the shortness of the stamens, unless the flower happens to + stand inclined. The present species, therefore, does not seem so well + fitted for self-fertilisation as most of the others. Nevertheless Papaver + vagum produced plenty of capsules in my garden when insects were excluded, + but only late in the season. I may here add that Papaver somniferum + produces an abundance of spontaneously self-fertilised capsules, as + Professor H. Hoffmann likewise found to be the case. (4/2. ‘Zur + Speciesfrage’ 1875 page 53.) Some species of Papaver cross freely when + growing in the same garden, as I have known to be the case with Papaver + bracteatum and orientale. + </p> + <p> + Plants of Papaver vagum were raised from seeds sent me from Antibes + through the kindness of Dr. Bornet. Some little time after the flowers had + expanded, several were fertilised with their own pollen, and others (not + castrated) with pollen from a distinct individual; but I have reason to + believe, from observations subsequently made, that these flowers had been + already fertilised by their own pollen, as this process seems to take + place soon after their expansion. (4/3. Mr. J. Scott found ‘Report on the + Experimental Culture of the Opium Poppy’ Calcutta 1874 page 47, in the + case of Papaver somniferum, that if he cut away the stigmatic surface + before the flower had expanded, no seeds were produced; but if this was + done “on the second day, or even a few hours after the expansion of the + flower on the first day, a partial fertilisation had already been + effected, and a few good seeds were almost invariably produced.” This + proves at how early a period fertilisation takes place.) I raised, + however, a few seedlings of both lots, and the self-fertilised rather + exceeded the crossed plants in height. + </p> + <p> + Early in the following year I acted differently, and fertilised seven + flowers, very soon after their expansion, with pollen from another plant, + and obtained six capsules. From counting the seeds in a medium-sized one, + I estimated that the average number in each was at least 120. Four out of + twelve capsules, spontaneously self-fertilised at the same time, were + found to contain no good seeds; and the remaining eight contained on an + average 6.6 seeds per capsule. But it should be observed that later in the + season the same plants produced under a net plenty of very fine + spontaneously self-fertilised capsules. + </p> + <p> + The above two lots of seeds, after germinating on sand, were planted in + pairs on opposite sides of five pots. The two lots of seedlings, when half + an inch in height, and again when 6 inches high, were measured to the tips + of their leaves, but presented no difference. When fully grown, the + flower-stalks were measured to the summits of the seed capsules, with the + following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/33. Papaver vagum. + </p> + <p> + Heights of flower-stalks to the summits of the seed capsules measured in + inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 24 2/8 : 21. Pot 1 : 30 : 26 5/8. Pot 1 : 18 4/8 : 16. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 14 4/8 : 15 3/8. Pot 2 : 22 : 20 1/8. Pot 2 : 19 5/8 : 14 1/8. Pot + 2 : 21 5/8 : 16 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 20 6/8 : 19 2/8. Pot 3 : 20 2/8 : 13 2/8. Pot 3 : 20 6/8 : 18. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 25 3/8 : 23 2/8. Pot 4 : 24 2/8 : 23. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 20 : 18 3/8. Pot 5 : 27 7/8 : 27. Pot 5 : 19 : 21 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 328.75 : 293.13. + </p> + <p> + The fifteen crossed plants here average 21.91 inches, and the fifteen + self-fertilised plants 19.54 inches in height, or as 100 to 89. These + plants did not differ in fertility, as far as could be judged by the + number of capsules produced, for there were seventy-five on the crossed + side and seventy-four on the self-fertilised side. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica. + </p> + <p> + This plant is remarkable from the crossed seedlings not exceeding in + height or vigour the self-fertilised. On the other hand, a cross greatly + increases the productiveness of the flowers on the parent-plant, and is + indeed sometimes necessary in order that they should produce any seed; + moreover, plants thus derived are themselves much more fertile than those + raised from self-fertilised flowers; so that the whole advantage of a + cross is confined to the reproductive system. It will be necessary for me + to give this singular case in considerable detail. + </p> + <p> + Twelve flowers on some plants in my flower-garden were fertilised with + pollen from distinct plants, and produced twelve capsules; but one of + these contained no good seed. The seeds of the eleven good capsules + weighed 17.4 grains. Eighteen flowers on the same plants were fertilised + with their own pollen and produced twelve good capsules, which contained + 13.61 grains weight of seed. Therefore an equal number of crossed and + self-fertilised capsules would have yielded seed by weight as 100 to 71. + (4/4. Professor Hildebrand experimented on plants in Germany on a larger + scale than I did, and found them much more self-fertile. Eighteen + capsules, produced by cross-fertilisation, contained on an average + eighty-five seeds, whilst fourteen capsules from self-fertilised flowers + contained on an average only nine seeds; that is, as 100 to 11: ‘Jahrb. + fur Wissen Botanik.’ B. 7 page 467.) If we take into account of the fact + that a much greater proportion of flowers produced capsules when crossed + than when self-fertilised, the relative fertility of the crossed to the + self-fertilised flowers was as 100 to 52. Nevertheless these plants, + whilst still protected by the net, spontaneously produced a considerable + number of self-fertilised capsules. + </p> + <p> + The seeds of the two lots after germinating on sand were planted in pairs + on the opposite sides of four large pots. At first there was no difference + in their growth, but ultimately the crossed seedlings exceeded the + self-fertilised considerably in height, as shown in Table 4/34. But I + believe from the cases which follow that this result was accidental, owing + to only a few plants having been measured, and to one of the + self-fertilised plants having grown only to a height of 15 inches. The + plants had been kept in the greenhouse, and from being drawn up to the + light had to be tied to sticks in this and the following trials. They were + measured to the summits of their flower-stems. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/34. Eschscholtzia californica. + </p> + <p> + Heights of Plants to the summits of their flower-stems measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 33 4/8 : 25. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 34 2/8 : 35. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 29 : 27 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 22 : 15. + </p> + <p> + Total : 118.75 : 102.25. + </p> + <p> + The four crossed plants here average 29.68 inches, and the four + self-fertilised 25.56 in height; or as 100 to 86. The remaining seeds were + sown in a large pot in which a Cineraria had long been growing; and in + this case again the two crossed plants on the one side greatly exceeded in + height the two self-fertilised plants on the opposite side. The plants in + the above four pots from having been kept in the greenhouse did not + produce on this or any other similar occasion many capsules; but the + flowers on the crossed plants when again crossed were much more productive + than the flowers on the self-fertilised plants when again self-fertilised. + These plants after seeding were cut down and kept in the greenhouse; and + in the following year, when grown again, their relative heights were + reversed, as the self-fertilised plants in three out of the four pots were + now taller than and flowered before the crossed plants. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + The fact just given with respect to the growth of the cut-down plants made + me doubtful about my first trial, so I determined to make another on a + larger scale with crossed and self-fertilised seedlings raised from the + crossed and self-fertilised plants of the last generation. Eleven pairs + were raised and grown in competition in the usual manner; and now the + result was different, for the two lots were nearly equal during their + whole growth. It would therefore be superfluous to give a table of their + heights. When fully grown and measured, the crossed averaged 32.47, and + the self-fertilised 32.81 inches in height; or as 100 to 101. There was no + great difference in the number of flowers and capsules produced by the two + lots when both were left freely exposed to the visits of insects. + </p> + <h3> + PLANTS RAISED FROM BRAZILIAN SEED. + </h3> + <p> + Fritz Muller sent me from South Brazil seeds of plants which were there + absolutely sterile when fertilised with pollen from the same plant, but + were perfectly fertile when fertilised with pollen from any other plant. + The plants raised by me in England from these seeds were examined by + Professor Asa Gray, and pronounced to belong to E. Californica, with which + they were identical in general appearance. Two of these plants were + covered by a net, and were found not to be so completely self-sterile as + in Brazil. But I shall recur to this subject in another part of this work. + Here it will suffice to state that eight flowers on these two plants, + fertilised with pollen from another plant under the net, produced eight + fine capsules, each containing on an average about eighty seeds. Eight + flowers on these same plants, fertilised with their own pollen, produced + seven capsules, which contained on an average only twelve seeds, with a + maximum in one of sixteen seeds. Therefore the cross-fertilised capsules, + compared with the self-fertilised, yielded seeds in the ratio of about 100 + to 15. These plants of Brazilian parentage differed also in a marked + manner from the English plants in producing extremely few spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules under a net. + </p> + <p> + Crossed and self-fertilised seeds from the above plants, after germinating + on bare sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of five large + pots. The seedlings thus raised were the grandchildren of the plants which + grew in Brazil; the parents having been grown in England. As the + grandparents in Brazil absolutely require cross-fertilisation in order to + yield any seeds, I expected that self-fertilisation would have proved very + injurious to these seedlings, and that the crossed ones would have been + greatly superior in height and vigour to those raised from self-fertilised + flowers. But the result showed that my anticipation was erroneous; for as + in the last experiment with plants of the English stock, so in the present + one, the self-fertilised plants exceeded the crossed by a little in + height. It will be sufficient to state that the fourteen crossed plants + averaged 44.64, and the fourteen self-fertilised 45.12 inches in height; + or as 100 to 101. + </p> + <h3> + THE EFFECTS OF A CROSS WITH A FRESH STOCK. + </h3> + <p> + I now tried a different experiment. Eight flowers on the self-fertilised + plants of the last experiment (i.e., grandchildren of the plants which + grew in Brazil) were again fertilised with pollen from the same plant, and + produced five capsules, containing on an average 27.4 seeds, with a + maximum in one of forty-two seeds. The seedlings raised from these seeds + formed the second SELF-FERTILISED generation of the Brazilian stock. + </p> + <p> + Eight flowers on one of the crossed plants of the last experiment were + crossed with pollen from another grandchild, and produced five capsules. + These contained on an average 31.6 seeds, with a maximum in one of + forty-nine seeds. The seedlings raised from these seeds may be called the + INTERCROSSED. + </p> + <p> + Lastly, eight other flowers on the crossed plants of the last experiment + were fertilised with pollen from a plant of the English stock, growing in + my garden, and which must have been exposed during many previous + generations to very different conditions from those to which the Brazilian + progenitors of the mother-plant had been subjected. These eight flowers + produced only four capsules, containing on an average 63.2 seeds, with a + maximum in one of ninety. The plants raised from these seeds may be called + the ENGLISH-CROSSED. As far as the above averages can be trusted from so + few capsules, the English-crossed capsules contained twice as many seeds + as the intercrossed, and rather more than twice as many as the + self-fertilised capsules. The plants which yielded these capsules were + grown in pots in the greenhouse, so that their absolute productiveness + must not be compared with that of plants growing out of doors. + </p> + <p> + The above three lots of seeds, namely, the self-fertilised, intercrossed, + and English-crossed, were planted in an equal state of germination (having + been as usual sown on bare sand) in nine large pots, each divided into + three parts by superficial partitions. Many of the self-fertilised seeds + germinated before those of the two crossed lots, and these were of course + rejected. The seedlings thus raised are the great-grandchildren of the + plants which grew in Brazil. When they were from 2 to 4 inches in height, + the three lots were equal. They were measured when four-fifths grown, and + again when fully grown, and as their relative heights were almost exactly + the same at these two ages, I will give only the last measurements. The + average height of the nineteen English-crossed plants was 45.92 inches; + that of the eighteen intercrossed plants (for one died), 43.38; and that + of the nineteen self-fertilised plants, 50.3 inches. So that we have the + following ratios in height:— + </p> + <p> + The English-crossed to the self-fertilised plants, as 100 to 109. + </p> + <p> + The English-crossed to the intercrossed plants, as 100 to 94. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed to the self-fertilised plants, as 100 to 116. + </p> + <p> + After the seed-capsules had been gathered, all these plants were cut down + close to the ground and weighed. The nineteen English crossed plants + weighed 18.25 ounces; the intercrossed plants (with their weight + calculated as if there had been nineteen) weighed 18.2 ounces; and the + nineteen self-fertilised plants, 21.5 ounces. We have therefore for the + weights of the three lots of plants the following ratios:— + </p> + <p> + The English-crossed to the self-fertilised plants, as 100 to 118. + </p> + <p> + The English-crossed to the intercrossed plants, as 100 to 100. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed to the self-fertilised plants, as 100 to 118. + </p> + <p> + We thus see that in weight, as in height, the self-fertilised plants had a + decided advantage over the English-crossed and intercrossed plants. + </p> + <p> + The remaining seeds of the three kinds, whether or not in a state of + germination, were sown in three long parallel rows in the open ground; and + here again the self-fertilised seedlings exceeded in height by between 2 + and 3 inches the seedlings in the two other rows, which were of nearly + equal heights. The three rows were left unprotected throughout the winter, + and all the plants were killed, with the exception of two of the + self-fertilised; so that as far as this little bit of evidence goes, some + of the self-fertilised plants were more hardy than any of the crossed + plants of either lot. + </p> + <p> + We thus see that the self-fertilised plants which were grown in the nine + pots were superior in height (as 116 to 100), and in weight (as 118 to + 100), and apparently in hardiness, to the intercrossed plants derived from + a cross between the grandchildren of the Brazilian stock. The superiority + is here much more strongly marked than in the second trial with the plants + of the English stock, in which the self-fertilised were to the crossed in + height as 101 to 100. It is a far more remarkable fact—if we bear in + mind the effects of crossing plants with pollen from a fresh stock in the + cases of Ipomoea, Mimulus, Brassica, and Iberis—that the + self-fertilised plants exceeded in height (as 109 to 100), and in weight + (as 118 to 100), the offspring of the Brazilian stock crossed by the + English stock; the two stocks having been long subjected to widely + different conditions. + </p> + <p> + If we now turn to the fertility of the three lots of plants we find a very + different result. I may premise that in five out of the nine pots the + first plant which flowered was one of the English-crossed; in four of the + pots it was a self-fertilised plant; and in not one did an intercrossed + plant flower first; so that these latter plants were beaten in this + respect, as in so many other ways. The three closely adjoining rows of + plants growing in the open ground flowered profusely, and the flowers were + incessantly visited by bees, and certainly thus intercrossed. The manner + in which several plants in the previous experiments continued to be almost + sterile as long as they were covered by a net, but set a multitude of + capsules immediately that they were uncovered, proves how effectually the + bees carry pollen from plant to plant. My gardener gathered, at three + successive times, an equal number of ripe capsules from the plants of the + three lots, until he had collected forty-five from each lot. It is not + possible to judge from external appearance whether or not a capsule + contains any good seeds; so that I opened all the capsules. Of the + forty-five from the English-crossed plants, four were empty; of those from + the intercrossed, five were empty; and of those from the self-fertilised, + nine were empty. The seeds were counted in twenty-one capsules taken by + chance out of each lot, and the average number of seeds in the capsules + from the English-crossed plants was 67; from the intercrossed, 56; and + from the self-fertilised, 48.52. It therefore follows that:— + </p> + <p> + The forty-five capsules (the four empty ones included) from the + English-crossed plants contained 2747 seeds. + </p> + <p> + The forty-five capsules (the five empty ones included) from the + intercrossed plants contained 2240 seeds. + </p> + <p> + The forty-five capsules (the nine empty ones included) from the + self-fertilised plants contained 1746.7 seeds. + </p> + <p> + The reader should remember that these capsules are the product of + cross-fertilisation, effected by the bees; and that the difference in the + number of the contained seeds must depend on the constitution of the + plants;—that is, on whether they were derived from a cross with a + distinct stock, or from a cross between plants of the same stock, or from + self-fertilisation. From the above facts we obtain the following ratios:— + </p> + <p> + Number of seeds contained in an equal number of naturally fertilised + capsules produced:— + </p> + <p> + By the English-crossed and self-fertilised plants, as 100 to 63. + </p> + <p> + By the English-crossed and intercrossed plants, as 100 to 81. + </p> + <p> + By the intercrossed and self-fertilised plants, as 100 to 78. + </p> + <p> + But to have ascertained the productiveness of the three lots of plants, it + would have been necessary to know how many capsules were produced by the + same number of plants. The three long rows, however, were not of quite + equal lengths, and the plants were much crowded, so that it would have + been extremely difficult to have ascertained how many capsules were + produced by them, even if I had been willing to undertake so laborious a + task as to collect and count all the capsules. But this was feasible with + the plants grown in pots in the greenhouse; and although these were much + less fertile than those growing out of doors, their relative fertility + appeared, after carefully observing them, to be the same. The nineteen + plants of the English-crossed stock in the pots produced altogether 240 + capsules; the intercrossed plants (calculated as nineteen) produced 137.22 + capsules; and the nineteen self-fertilised plants, 152 capsules. Now, + knowing the number of seeds contained in forty-five capsules of each lot, + it is easy to calculate the relative numbers of seeds produced by an equal + number of the plants of the three lots. + </p> + <p> + Number of seeds produced by an equal number of naturally-fertilised + plants:— + </p> + <p> + Plants of English-crossed and self-fertilised parentage, as 100 to 40 + seeds. + </p> + <p> + Plants of English-crossed and intercrossed parentage, as 100 to 45 seeds. + </p> + <p> + Plants of intercrossed and self-fertilised parentage, as 100 to 89 seeds. + </p> + <p> + The superiority in productiveness of the intercrossed plants (that is, the + product of a cross between the grandchildren of the plants which grew in + Brazil) over the self-fertilised, small as it is, is wholly due to the + larger average number of seeds contained in the capsules; for the + intercrossed plants produced fewer capsules in the greenhouse than did the + self-fertilised plants. The great superiority in productiveness of the + English-crossed over the self-fertilised plants is shown by the larger + number of capsules produced, the larger average number of contained seeds, + and the smaller number of empty capsules. As the English-crossed and + intercrossed plants were the offspring of crosses in every previous + generation (as must have been the case from the flowers being sterile with + their own pollen), we may conclude that the great superiority in + productiveness of the English-crossed over the intercrossed plants is due + to the two parents of the former having been long subjected to different + conditions. + </p> + <p> + The English-crossed plants, though so superior in productiveness, were, as + we have seen, decidedly inferior in height and weight to the + self-fertilised, and only equal to, or hardly superior to, the + intercrossed plants. Therefore, the whole advantage of a cross with a + distinct stock is here confined to productiveness, and I have met with no + similar case. + </p> + <p> + 8. RESEDACEAE.—Reseda lutea. + </p> + <p> + Seeds collected from wild plants growing in this neighbourhood were sown + in the kitchen-garden; and several of the seedlings thus raised were + covered with a net. Of these, some were found (as will hereafter be more + fully described) to be absolutely sterile when left to fertilise + themselves spontaneously, although plenty of pollen fell on their stigmas; + and they were equally sterile when artificially and repeatedly fertilised + with their own pollen; whilst other plants produced a few spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules. The remaining plants were left uncovered, and as + pollen was carried from plant to plant by the hive and humble-bees which + incessantly visit the flowers, they produced an abundance of capsules. Of + the necessity of pollen being carried from one plant to another, I had + ample evidence in the case of this species and of R. odorata; for those + plants, which set no seeds or very few as long as they were protected from + insects, became loaded with capsules immediately that they were uncovered. + </p> + <p> + Seeds from the flowers spontaneously self-fertilised under the net, and + from flowers naturally crossed by the bees, were sown on opposite sides of + five large pots. The seedlings were thinned as soon as they appeared above + ground, so that an equal number were left on the two sides. After a time + the pots were plunged into the open ground. The same number of plants of + crossed and self-fertilised parentage were measured up to the summits of + their flower-stems, with the result given in Table 4/35. Those which did + not produce flower-stems were not measured. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/35. Reseda lutea, in pots. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants to the summits of the flower-stems measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 21 : 12 7/8. Pot 1 : 14 2/8 : 16. Pot 1 : 19 1/8 : 11 7/8. Pot 1 : + 7 : 15 2/8. Pot 1 : 15 1/8 : 19 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 20 4/8 : 12 4/8. Pot 2 : 17 3/8 : 16 2/8. Pot 2 : 23 7/8 : 16 2/8. + Pot 2 : 17 1/8 : 13 3/8. Pot 2 : 20 6/8 : 13 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 16 1/8 : 14 4/8. Pot 3 : 17 6/8 : 19 4/8. Pot 3 : 16 2/8 : 20 7/8. + Pot 3 : 10 : 7 7/8. Pot 3 : 10 : 17 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 22 1/8 : 9. Pot 4 : 19 : 11 4/8. Pot 4 : 18 7/8 : 11. Pot 4 : 16 + 4/8 : 16. Pot 4 : 19 2/8 : 16 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 25 2/8 : 14 6/8. Pot 5 : 22 : 16. Pot 5 : 8 6/8 : 14 3/8. Pot 5 : + 14 2/8 : 14 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 412.25 : 350.86. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the twenty-four crossed plants is here 17.17 inches, + and that of the same number of self-fertilised plants 14.61; or as 100 to + 85. Of the crossed plants all but five flowered, whilst several of the + self-fertilised did not do so. The above pairs, whilst still in flower, + but with some capsules already formed, were afterwards cut down and + weighed. The crossed weighed 90.5 ounces; and an equal number of the + self-fertilised only 19 ounces, or as 100 to 21; and this is an + astonishing difference. + </p> + <p> + Seeds of the same two lots were also sown in two adjoining rows in the + open ground. There were twenty crossed plants in the one row and + thirty-two self-fertilised plants in the other row, so that the experiment + was not quite fair; but not so unfair as it at first appears, for the + plants in the same row were not crowded so much as seriously to interfere + with each other’s growth, and the ground was bare on the outside of both + rows. These plants were better nourished than those in the pots and grew + to a greater height. The eight tallest plants in each row were measured in + the same manner as before, with the following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/36. Reseda lutea, growing in the open ground. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants to the summits of the flower-stems measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + 28 : 33 2/8. + 27 3/8 : 23. + 27 5/8 : 21 5/8. + 28 6/8 : 20 4/8. + 29 7/8 : 21 5/8. + 26 6/8 : 22. + 26 2/8 : 21 2/8. + 30 1/8 : 21 7/8. +</pre> + <p> + Total : 224.75 : 185.13 + </p> + <p> + The average height of the crossed plants, whilst in full flower, was here + 28.09, and that of the self-fertilised 23.14 inches; or as 100 to 82. It + is a singular fact that the tallest plant in the two rows, was one of the + self-fertilised. The self-fertilised plants had smaller and paler green + leaves than the crossed. All the plants in the two rows were afterwards + cut down and weighed. The twenty crossed plants weighed 65 ounces, and + twenty self-fertilised (by calculation from the actual weight of the + thirty-two self-fertilised plants) weighed 26.25 ounces; or as 100 to 40. + Therefore the crossed plants did not exceed in weight the self-fertilised + plants in nearly so great a degree as those growing in the pots, owing + probably to the latter having been subjected to more severe mutual + competition. On the other hand, they exceeded the self-fertilised in + height in a slightly greater degree. + </p> + <p> + Reseda odorata. + </p> + <p> + Plants of the common mignonette were raised from purchased seed, and + several of them were placed under separate nets. Of these some became + loaded with spontaneously self-fertilised capsules; others produced a few, + and others not a single one. It must not be supposed that these latter + plants produced no seed because their stigmas did not receive any pollen, + for they were repeatedly fertilised with pollen from the same plant with + no effect; but they were perfectly fertile with pollen from any other + plant. Spontaneously self-fertilised seeds were saved from one of the + highly self-fertile plants, and other seeds were collected from the plants + growing outside the nets, which had been crossed by the bees. These seeds + after germinating on sand were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of + five pots. The plants were trained up sticks, and measured to the summits + of their leafy stems—the flower-stems not being included. We here + have the result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/37. Reseda odorata (seedlings from a highly self-fertile plant). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants to the summits of the leafy stems, flower-stems not + included, measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 20 7/8 : 22 4/8. Pot 1 : 34 7/8 : 28 5/8. Pot 1 : 26 6/8 : 23 2/8. + Pot 1 : 32 6/8 : 30 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 34 3/8 : 28 5/8. Pot 2 : 34 5/8 : 30 5/8. Pot 2 : 11 6/8 : 23. Pot + 2 : 33 3/8 : 30 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 17 7/8 : 4 4/8. Pot 3 : 27 : 25. Pot 3 : 30 1/8 : 26 3/8. Pot 3 : + 30 2/8 : 25 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 21 5/8 : 22 6/8. Pot 4 : 28 : 25 4/8. Pot 4 : 32 5/8 : 15 1/8. Pot + 4 : 32 3/8 : 24 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 21 : 11 6/8. Pot 5 : 25 2/8 : 19 7/8. Pot 5 : 26 6/8 : 10 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 522.25 : 428.50. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the nineteen crossed plants is here 27.48, and that + of the nineteen self-fertilised 22.55 inches; or as 100 to 82. All these + plants were cut down in the early autumn and weighed: the crossed weighed + 11.5 ounces, and the self-fertilised 7.75 ounces, or as 100 to 67. These + two lots having been left freely exposed to the visits of insects, did not + present any difference to the eye in the number of seed-capsules which + they produced. + </p> + <p> + The remainder of the same two lots of seeds were sown in two adjoining + rows in the open ground; so that the plants were exposed to only moderate + competition. The eight tallest on each side were measured, as shown in + Table 4/38. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/38. Reseda odorata, growing in the open ground. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + 24 4/8 : 26 5/8. + 27 2/8 : 25 7/8. + 24 : 25. + 26 6/8 : 28 3/8. + 25 : 29 7/8. + 26 2/8 : 25 7/8. + 27 2/8 : 26 7/8. + 25 1/8 : 28 2/8. +</pre> + <p> + Total : 206.13 : 216.75 + </p> + <p> + The average height of the eight crossed plants is 25.76, and that of the + eight self-fertilised 27.09; or as 100 to 105. + </p> + <p> + We here have the anomalous result of the self-fertilised plants being a + little taller than the crossed; of which fact I can offer no explanation. + It is of course possible, but not probable, that the labels may have been + interchanged by accident. + </p> + <p> + Another experiment was now tried: all the self-fertilised capsules, though + very few in number, were gathered from one of the semi-self-sterile plants + under a net; and as several flowers on this same plant had been fertilised + with pollen from a distinct individual, crossed seeds were thus obtained. + I expected that the seedlings from this semi-self-sterile plant would have + profited in a higher degree from a cross, than did the seedlings from the + fully self-fertile plants. But my anticipation was quite wrong, for they + profited in a less degree. An analogous result followed in the case of + Eschscholtzia, in which the offspring of the plants of Brazilian parentage + (which were partially self-sterile) did not profit more from a cross, than + did the plants of the far more self-fertile English stock. The above two + lots of crossed and self-fertilised seeds from the same plant of Reseda + odorata, after germinating on sand, were planted on opposite sides of five + pots, and measured as in the last case, with the result in Table 4/39. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/39. Reseda odorata (seedlings from a semi-self-sterile plant). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants to the summits of the leafy stems, flower-stems not + included, measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 33 4/8 : 31. Pot 1 : 30 6/8 : 28. Pot 1 : 29 6/8 : 13 2/8. Pot 1 : + 20 : 32. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 22 : 21 6/8. Pot 2 : 33 4/8 : 26 6/8. Pot 2 : 31 2/8 : 25 2/8. Pot + 2 : 32 4/8 : 30 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 30 1/8 : 17 2/8. Pot 3 : 32 1/8 : 29 6/8. Pot 3 : 31 4/8 : 24 6/8. + Pot 3 : 32 2/8 : 34 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 19 1/8 : 20 6/8. Pot 4 : 30 1/8 : 32 6/8. Pot 4 : 24 3/8 : 31 4/8. + Pot 4 : 30 6/8 : 36 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 34 6/8 : 24 5/8. Pot 5 : 37 1/8 : 34. Pot 5 : 31 2/8 : 22 2/8. Pot + 5 : 33 : 37 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 599.75 : 554.25. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the twenty crossed plants is here 29.98, and that of + the twenty self-fertilised 27.71 inches; or as 100 to 92. These plants + were then cut down and weighed; and the crossed in this case exceeded the + self-fertilised in weight by a mere trifle, namely, in the ratio of 100 to + 99. The two lots, left freely exposed to insects, seemed to be equally + fertile. + </p> + <p> + The remainder of the seed was sown in two adjoining rows in the open + ground; and the eight tallest plants in each row were measured, with the + result in Table 4/40. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/40. Reseda odorata, (seedlings from a semi-self-sterile plant, + planted in the open ground). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + 28 2/8 : 22 3/8. + 22 4/8 : 24 3/8. + 25 7/8 : 23 4/8. + 25 3/8 : 21 4/8. + 29 4/8 : 22 5/8. + 27 1/8 : 27 3/8. + 22 4/8 : 27 3/8. + 26 2/8 : 19 2/8. +</pre> + <p> + Total : 207.38 : 188.38. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the eight crossed plants is here 25.92, and that of + the eight self-fertilised plants 23.54 inches; or as 100 to 90. + </p> + <p> + 9. VIOLACEAE.—Viola tricolor. + </p> + <p> + Whilst the flowers of the common cultivated heartsease are young, the + anthers shed their pollen into a little semi-cylindrical passage, formed + by the basal portion of the lower petal, and surrounded by papillae. The + pollen thus collected lies close beneath the stigma, but can seldom gain + access into its cavity, except by the aid of insects, which pass their + proboscides down this passage into the nectary. (4/5. The flowers of this + plant have been fully described by Sprengel, Hildebrand, Delpino, and H. + Muller. The latter author sums up all the previous observations in his + ‘Befruchtung der Blumen’ and in ‘Nature’ November 20, 1873 page 44. See + also Mr. A.W. Bennett in ‘Nature’ May 15, 1873 page 50 and some remarks by + Mr. Kitchener ibid page 143. The facts which follow on the effects of + covering up a plant of V. tricolor have been quoted by Sir J. Lubbock in + his ‘British Wild Flowers’ etc. page 62.) Consequently when I covered up a + large plant of a cultivated variety, it set only eighteen capsules, and + most of these contained very few good seeds—several from only one to + three; whereas an equally fine uncovered plant of the same variety, + growing close by, produced 105 fine capsules. The few flowers which + produce capsules when insects are excluded, are perhaps fertilised by the + curling inwards of the petals as their wither, for by this means + pollen-grains adhering to the papillae might be inserted into the cavity + of the stigma. But it is more probable that their fertilisation is + effected, as Mr. Bennett suggests, by Thrips and certain minute beetles + which haunt the flowers, and which cannot be excluded by any net. + Humble-bees are the usual fertilisers; but I have more than once seen + flies (Rhingia rostrata) at work, with the under sides of their bodies, + heads and legs dusted with pollen; and having marked the flowers which + they visited, I found them after a few days fertilised. (4/6. I should add + that this fly apparently did not suck the nectar, but was attracted by the + papillae which surround the stigma. Hermann Muller also saw a small bee, + an Andrena, which could not reach the nectar, repeatedly inserting its + proboscis beneath the stigma, where the papillae are situated; so that + these papillae must be in some way attractive to insects. A writer asserts + ‘Zoologist’ volume 3-4 page 1225, that a moth (Plusia) frequently visits + the flowers of the pansy. Hive-bees do not ordinarily visit them, but a + case has been recorded ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1844 page 374, of these bees + doing so. Hermann Muller has also seen the hive-bee at work, but only on + the wild small-flowered form. He gives a list ‘Nature’ 1873 page 45, of + all the insects which he has seen visiting both the large and + small-flowered forms. From his account, I suspect that the flowers of + plants in a state of nature are visited more frequently by insects than + those of the cultivated varieties. He has seen several butterflies sucking + the flowers of wild plants, and this I have never observed in gardens, + though I have watched the flowers during many years.) It is curious for + how long a time the flowers of the heartsease and of some other plants may + be watched without an insect being seen to visit them. During the summer + of 1841, I observed many times daily for more than a fortnight some large + clumps of heartsease growing in my garden, before I saw a single + humble-bee at work. During another summer I did the same, but at last saw + some dark-coloured humble-bees visiting on three successive days almost + every flower in several clumps; and almost all these flowers quickly + withered and produced fine capsules. I presume that a certain state of the + atmosphere is necessary for the secretion of nectar, and that as soon as + this occurs the insects discover the fact by the odour emitted, and + immediately frequent the flowers. + </p> + <p> + As the flowers require the aid of insects for their complete + fertilisation, and as they are not visited by insects nearly so often as + most other nectar-secreting flowers, we can understand the remarkable fact + discovered by H. Muller and described by him in ‘Nature,’ namely, that + this species exists under two forms. One of these bears conspicuous + flowers, which, as we have seen, require the aid of insects, and are + adapted to be cross-fertilised by them; whilst the other form has much + smaller and less conspicuously coloured flowers, which are constructed on + a slightly different plan, favouring self-fertilisation, and are thus + adapted to ensure the propagation of the species. The self-fertile form, + however, is occasionally visited, and may be crossed by insects, though + this is rather doubtful. + </p> + <p> + In my first experiments on Viola tricolor I was unsuccessful in raising + seedlings, and obtained only one full-grown crossed and self-fertilised + plant. The former was 12 1/2 inches and the latter 8 inches in height. On + the following year several flowers on a fresh plant were crossed with + pollen from another plant, which was known to be a distinct seedling; and + to this point it is important to attend. Several other flowers on the same + plant were fertilised with their own pollen. The average number of seeds + in the ten crossed capsules was 18.7, and in the twelve self-fertilised + capsules 12.83; or as 100 to 69. These seeds, after germinating on bare + sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of five pots. They were + first measured when about a third of their full size, and the crossed + plants then averaged 3.87 inches, and the self-fertilised only 2.00 inches + in height; or as 100 to 52. They were kept in the greenhouse, and did not + grow vigorously. Whilst in flower they were again measured to the summits + of their stems (see Table 4/41), with the following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/41. Viola tricolor. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 8 2/8 : 0 2/8. Pot 1 : 7 4/8 : 2 4/8. Pot 1 : 5 : 1 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 5 : 6. Pot 2 : 4 : 4. Pot 2 : 4 4/8 : 3 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 9 4/8 : 3 1/8. Pot 3 : 3 3/8 : 1 7/8. Pot 3 : 8 4/8 : 0 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 4 7/8 : 2 1/8. Pot 4 : 4 2/8 : 1 6/8. Pot 4 : 4 : 2 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 6 : 3. Pot 5 : 3 3/8 : 1 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 78.13 : 33.25. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the fourteen crossed plants is here 5.58 inches, and + that of the fourteen self-fertilised 2.37; or as 100 to 42. In four out of + the five pots, a crossed plant flowered before any one of the + self-fertilised; as likewise occurred with the pair raised during the + previous year. These plants without being disturbed were now turned out of + their pots and planted in the open ground, so as to form five separate + clumps. Early in the following summer (1869) they flowered profusely, and + being visited by humble-bees set many capsules, which were carefully + collected from all the plants on both sides. The crossed plants produced + 167 capsules, and the self-fertilised only 17; or as 100 to 10. So that + the crossed plants were more than twice the height of the self-fertilised, + generally flowered first, and produced ten times as many naturally + fertilised capsules. + </p> + <p> + By the early part of the summer of 1870 the crossed plants in all the five + clumps had grown and spread so much more than the self-fertilised, that + any comparison between them was superfluous. The crossed plants were + covered with a sheet of bloom, whilst only a single self-fertilised plant, + which was much finer than any of its brethren, flowered. The crossed and + self-fertilised plants had now grown all matted together on the respective + sides of the superficial partitions still separating them; and in the + clump which included the finest self-fertilised plant, I estimated that + the surface covered by the crossed plants was about nine times as large as + that covered by the self-fertilised plants. The extraordinary superiority + of the crossed over the self-fertilised plants in all five clumps, was no + doubt due to the crossed plants at first having had a decided advantage + over the self-fertilised, and then robbing them more and more of their + food during the succeeding seasons. But we should remember that the same + result would follow in a state of nature even to a greater degree; for my + plants grew in ground kept clear of weeds, so that the self-fertilised had + to compete only with the crossed plants; whereas the whole surface of the + ground is naturally covered with various kinds of plants, all of which + have to struggle together for existence. + </p> + <p> + The ensuing winter was very severe, and in the following spring (1871) the + plants were again examined. All the self-fertilised were now dead, with + the exception of a single branch on one plant, which bore on its summit a + minute rosette of leaves about as large as a pea. On the other hand, all + the crossed plants without exception were growing vigorously. So that the + self-fertilised plants, besides their inferiority in other respects, were + more tender. + </p> + <p> + Another experiment was now tried for the sake of ascertaining how far the + superiority of the crossed plants, or to speak more correctly, the + inferiority of the self-fertilised plants, would be transmitted to their + offspring. The one crossed and one self-fertilised plant, which were first + raised, had been turned out of their pot and planted in the open ground. + Both produced an abundance of very fine capsules, from which fact we may + safely conclude that they had been cross-fertilised by insects. Seeds from + both, after germinating on sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite + sides of three pots. The naturally crossed seedlings derived from the + crossed plants flowered in all three pots before the naturally crossed + seedlings derived from the self-fertilised plants. When both lots were in + full flower, the two tallest plants on each side of each pot were + measured, and the result is shown in Table 4/42. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/42. Viola tricolor: seedlings from crossed and self-fertilised + plants, the parents of both sets having been left to be naturally + fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Naturally Crossed Plants from artificially crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Naturally Crossed Plants from Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 12 1/8 : 9 6/8. Pot 1 : 11 6/8 : 8 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 13 2/8 : 9 6/8. Pot 2 : 10 : 11 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 14 4/8 : 11 1/8. Pot 3 : 13 6/8 : 11 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 75.38 : 61.88. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the six tallest plants derived from the crossed + plants is 12.56 inches; and that of the six tallest plants derived from + the self-fertilised plants is 10.31 inches; or as 100 to 82. We here see a + considerable difference in height between the two sets, though very far + from equalling that in the previous trials between the offspring from + crossed and self-fertilised flowers. This difference must be attributed to + the latter set of plants having inherited a weak constitution from their + parents, the offspring of self-fertilised flowers; notwithstanding that + the parents themselves had been freely intercrossed with other plants by + the aid of insects. + </p> + <p> + 10. RANUNCULACEAE.—Adonis aestivalis. + </p> + <p> + The results of my experiments on this plant are hardly worth giving, as I + remark in my notes made at the time, “seedlings, from some unknown cause, + all miserably unhealthy.” Nor did they ever become healthy; yet I feel + bound to give the present case, as it is opposed to the general results at + which I have arrived. Fifteen flowers were crossed and all produced fruit, + containing on an average 32.5 seeds; nineteen flowers were fertilised with + their own pollen, and they likewise all yielded fruit, containing a rather + larger average of 34.5 seeds; or as 100 to 106. Seedlings were raised from + these seeds. In one of the pots all the self-fertilised plants died whilst + quite young; in the two others, the measurements were as follows: + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/43. Adonis aestivalis. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 14 : 13 4/8. Pot 1 : 13 4/8 : 13 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 16 2/8 : 15 2/8. Pot 2 : 13 2/8 : 15. + </p> + <p> + Total : 57.00 : 57.25. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the four crossed plants is 14.25, and that of the + four self-fertilised plants 14.31; or as 100 to 100.4; so that they were + in fact of equal height. According to Professor H. Hoffman, this plant is + proterandrous (4/7. ‘Zur Speciesfrage’ 1875 page 11.); nevertheless it + yields plenty of seeds when protected from insects. + </p> + <p> + Delphinium consolida. + </p> + <p> + It has been said in the case of this plant, as of so many others, that the + flowers are fertilised in the bud, and that distinct plants or varieties + can never naturally intercross. (4/8. Decaisne ‘Comptes-Rendus’ July 1863 + page 5.) But this is an error, as we may infer, firstly from the flowers + being proterandrous,—the mature stamens bending up, one after the + other, into the passage which leads to the nectary, and afterwards the + mature pistils bending in the same direction; secondly, from the number of + humble-bees which visit the flowers (4/9. Their structure is described by + H. Muller ‘Befruchtung’ etc., page 122.); and thirdly, from the greater + fertility of the flowers when crossed with pollen from a distinct plant + than when spontaneously self-fertilised. In the year 1863 I enclosed a + large branch in a net, and crossed five flowers with pollen from a + distinct plant; these yielded capsules containing on an average 35.2 very + fine seeds, with a maximum of forty-two in one capsule. Thirty-two other + flowers on the same branch produced twenty-eight spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules, containing on an average 17.2 seeds, with a + maximum in one of thirty-six seeds. But six of these capsules were very + poor, yielding only from one to five seeds; if these are excluded, the + remaining twenty-two capsules give an average of 20.9 seeds, though many + of these seeds were small. The fairest ratio, therefore, for the number of + seeds produced by a cross and by spontaneous self-fertilisation is as 100 + to 59. These seeds were not sown, as I had too many other experiments in + progress. + </p> + <p> + In the summer of 1867, which was a very unfavourable one, I again crossed + several flowers under a net with pollen from a distinct plant, and + fertilised other flowers on the same plant with their own pollen. The + former yielded a much larger proportion of capsules than the latter; and + many of the seeds in the self-fertilised capsules, though numerous, were + so poor that an equal number of seeds from the crossed and self-fertilised + capsules were in weight as 100 to 45. The two lots were allowed to + germinate on sand, and pairs were planted on the opposite sides of four + pots. When nearly two-thirds grown they were measured, as shown in Table + 4/44. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/44. Delphinium consolida. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 11 : 11. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 19 : 16 2/8. Pot 2 : 16 2/8 : 11 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 26 : 22. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 9 4/8 : 8 2/8. Pot 4 : 8 : 6 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 89.75 : 75.50. + </p> + <p> + The six crossed plants here average 14.95, and the six self-fertilised + 12.50 inches in height; or as 100 to 84. When fully grown they were again + measured, but from want of time only a single plant on each side was + measured; so that I have thought it best to give the earlier measurements. + At the later period the three tallest crossed plants still exceeded + considerably in height the three tallest self-fertilised, but not in quite + so great a degree as before. The pots were left uncovered in the + greenhouse, but whether the flowers were intercrossed by bees or + self-fertilised I do not know. The six crossed plants produced 282 mature + and immature capsules, whilst the six self-fertilised plants produced only + 159; or as 100 to 56. So that the crossed plants were very much more + productive than the self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + 11. CARYOPHYLLACEAE.—Viscaria oculata. + </p> + <p> + Twelve flowers were crossed with pollen from another plant, and yielded + ten capsules, containing by weight 5.77 grains of seeds. Eighteen flowers + were fertilised with their own pollen and yielded twelve capsules, + containing by weight 2.63 grains. Therefore the seeds from an equal number + of crossed and self-fertilised flowers would have been in weight as 100 to + 38. I had previously selected a medium-sized capsule from each lot, and + counted the seeds in both; the crossed one contained 284, and the + self-fertilised one 126 seeds; or as 100 to 44. These seeds were sown on + opposite sides of three pots, and several seedlings raised; but only the + tallest flower-stem of one plant on each side was measured. The three on + the crossed side averaged 32.5 inches, and the three on the + self-fertilised side 34 inches in height; or as 100 to 104. But this trial + was on much too small a scale to be trusted; the plants also grew so + unequally that one of the three flower-stems on the crossed plants was + very nearly twice as tall as that on one of the others; and one of the + three flower-stems on the self-fertilised plants exceeded in an equal + degree one of the others. + </p> + <p> + In the following year the experiment was repeated on a larger scale: ten + flowers were crossed on a new set of plants and yielded ten capsules + containing by weight 6.54 grains of seed. Eighteen spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules were gathered, of which two contained no seed; + the other sixteen contained by weight 6.07 grains of seed. Therefore the + weight of seed from an equal number of crossed and spontaneously + self-fertilised flowers (instead of artificially fertilised as in the + previous case) was as 100 to 58. + </p> + <p> + The seeds after germinating on sand were planted in pairs on the opposite + sides of four pots, with all the remaining seeds sown crowded in the + opposite sides of a fifth pot; in this latter pot only the tallest plant + on each side was measured. Until the seedlings had grown about 5 inches in + height no difference could be perceived in the two lots. Both lots + flowered at nearly the same time. When they had almost done flowering, the + tallest flower-stem on each plant was measured, as shown in Table 4/45. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/45. Viscaria oculata. + </p> + <p> + Tallest flower-stem on each plant measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 19 : 32 3/8. Pot 1 : 33 : 38. Pot 1 : 41 : 38. Pot 1 : 41 : 28 + 7/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 37 4/8 : 36. Pot 2 : 36 4/8 : 32 3/8. Pot 2 : 38 : 35 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 44 4/8 : 36. Pot 3 : 39 4/8 : 20 7/8. Pot 3 : 39 : 30 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 30 2/8 : 36. Pot 4 : 31 : 39. Pot 4 : 33 1/8 : 29. Pot 4 : 24 : 38 + 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 30 2/8 : 32. Crowded. + </p> + <p> + Total : 517.63 : 503.36. + </p> + <p> + The fifteen crossed plants here average 34.5, and the fifteen + self-fertilised 33.55 inches in height; or as 100 to 97. So that the + excess of height of the crossed plants is quite insignificant. In + productiveness, however, the difference was much more plainly marked. All + the capsules were gathered from both lots of plants (except from the + crowded and unproductive ones in Pot 5), and at the close of the season + the few remaining flowers were added in. The fourteen crossed plants + produced 381, whilst the fourteen self-fertilised plants produced only 293 + capsules and flowers; or as 100 to 77. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus. + </p> + <p> + The common carnation is strongly proterandrous, and therefore depends to a + large extent upon insects for fertilisation. I have seen only humble-bees + visiting the flowers, but I dare say other insects likewise do so. It is + notorious that if pure seed is desired, the greatest care is necessary to + prevent the varieties which grow in the same garden from intercrossing. + (4/10. ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1847 page 268.) The pollen is generally shed + and lost before the two stigmas in the same flower diverge and are ready + to be fertilised. I was therefore often forced to use for + self-fertilisation pollen from the same plant instead of from the same + flower. But on two occasions, when I attended to this point, I was not + able to detect any marked difference in the number of seeds produced by + these two forms of self-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + Several single-flowered carnations were planted in good soil, and were all + covered with a net. Eight flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct + plant and yielded six capsules, containing on an average 88.6 seeds, with + a maximum in one of 112 seeds. Eight other flowers were self-fertilised in + the manner above described, and yielded seven capsules containing on an + average 82 seeds, with a maximum in one of 112 seeds. So that there was + very little difference in the number of seeds produced by + cross-fertilisation and self-fertilisation, namely, as 100 to 92. As these + plants were covered by a net, they produced spontaneously only a few + capsules containing any seeds, and these few may perhaps be attributed to + the action of Thrips and other minute insects which haunt the flowers. A + large majority of the spontaneously self-fertilised capsules produced by + several plants contained no seeds, or only a single one. Excluding these + latter capsules, I counted the seeds in eighteen of the finest ones, and + these contained on an average 18 seeds. One of the plants was + spontaneously self-fertile in a higher degree than any of the others. On + another occasion a single covered-up plant produced spontaneously eighteen + capsules, but only two of these contained any seed, namely 10 and 15. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FIRST GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + The many seeds obtained from the above crossed and artificially + self-fertilised flowers were sown out of doors, and two large beds of + seedlings, closely adjoining one another, thus raised. This was the first + plant on which I experimented, and I had not then formed any regular + scheme of operation. When the two lots were in full flower, I measured + roughly a large number of plants but record only that the crossed were on + an average fully 4 inches taller than the self-fertilised. Judging from + subsequent measurements, we may assume that the crossed plants were about + 28 inches, and the self-fertilised about 24 inches in height; and this + will give us a ratio of 100 to 86. Out of a large number of plants, four + of the crossed ones flowered before any one of the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + Thirty flowers on these crossed plants of the first generation were again + crossed with pollen from a distinct plant of the same lot, and yielded + twenty-nine capsules, containing on an average 55.62 seeds, with a maximum + in one of 110 seeds. + </p> + <p> + Thirty flowers on the self-fertilised plants were again self-fertilised; + eight of them with pollen from the same flower, and the remainder with + pollen from another flower on the same plant; and these produced + twenty-two capsules, containing on an average 35.95 seeds, with a maximum + in one of sixty-one seeds. We thus see, judging by the number of seeds per + capsule, that the crossed plants again crossed were more productive than + the self-fertilised again self-fertilised, in the ratio of 100 to 65. Both + the crossed and self-fertilised plants, from having grown much crowded in + the two beds, produced less fine capsules and fewer seeds than did their + parents. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + The crossed and self-fertilised seeds from the crossed and self-fertilised + plants of the last generation were sown on opposite sides of two pots; but + the seedlings were not thinned enough, so that both lots grew very + irregularly, and most of the self-fertilised plants after a time died from + being smothered. My measurements were, therefore, very incomplete. From + the first the crossed seedlings appeared the finest, and when they were on + an average, by estimation, 5 inches high, the self-fertilised plants were + only 4 inches. In both pots the crossed plants flowered first. The two + tallest flower-stems on the crossed plants in the two pots were 17 and 16 + 1/2 inches in height; and the two tallest flower-stems on the + self-fertilised plants 10 1/2 and 9 inches; so that their heights were as + 100 to 58. But this ratio, deduced from only two pairs, obviously is not + in the least trustworthy, and would not have been given had it not been + otherwise supported. I state in my notes that the crossed plants were very + much more luxuriant than their opponents, and seemed to be twice as bulky. + This latter estimate may be believed from the ascertained weights of the + two lots in the next generation. Some flowers on these crossed plants were + again crossed with pollen from another plant of the same lot, and some + flowers on the self-fertilised plants again self-fertilised; and from the + seeds thus obtained the plants of the next generation were raised. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE THIRD GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + The seeds just alluded to were allowed to germinate on bare sand, and were + planted in pairs on the opposite sides of four pots. When the seedlings + were in full flower, the tallest stem on each plant was measured to the + base of the calyx. The measurements are given in Table 4/46. In Pot 1 the + crossed and self-fertilised plants flowered at the same time; but in the + other three pots the crossed flowered first. These latter plants also + continued flowering much later in the autumn than the self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/46. Dianthus caryophyllus (third generation). + </p> + <p> + Tallest flower-stem on each plant measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 28 6/8 : 30. Pot 1 : 27 3/8 : 26. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 29 : 30 7/8. Pot 2 : 29 4/8 : 27 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 28 4/8 : 31 6/8. Pot 3 : 23 4/8 : 24 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 27 : 30. Pot 4 : 33 4/8 : 25. + </p> + <p> + Total : 227.13 : 225.75. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the eight crossed plants is here 28.39 inches, and + of the eight self-fertilised 28.21; or as 100 to 99. So that there was no + difference in height worth speaking of; but in general vigour and + luxuriance there was an astonishing difference, as shown by their weights. + After the seed-capsules had been gathered, the eight crossed and the eight + self-fertilised plants were cut down and weighed; the former weighed 43 + ounces, and the latter only 21 ounces; or as 100 to 49. + </p> + <p> + These plants were all kept under a net, so that the capsules which they + produced must have been all spontaneously self-fertilised. The eight + crossed plants produced twenty-one such capsules, of which only twelve + contained any seed, averaging 8.5 per capsule. On the other hand, the + eight self-fertilised plants produced no less than thirty-six capsules, of + which I examined twenty-five, and, with the exception of three, all + contained seeds, averaging 10.63 seeds per capsule. Thus the proportional + number of seeds per capsule produced by the plants of crossed origin to + those produced by the plants of self-fertilised origin (both lots being + spontaneously self-fertilised) was as 100 to 125. This anomalous result is + probably due to some of the self-fertilised plants having varied so as to + mature their pollen and stigmas more nearly at the same time than is + proper to the species; and we have already seen that some plants in the + first experiment differed from the others in being slightly more + self-fertile. + </p> + <h3> + THE EFFECTS OF A CROSS WITH A FRESH STOCK. + </h3> + <p> + Twenty flowers on the self-fertilised plants of the last or third + generation, in Table 4/46, were fertilised with their own pollen, but + taken from other flowers on the same plants. These produced fifteen + capsules, which contained (omitting two with only three and six seeds) on + an average 47.23 seeds, with a maximum of seventy in one. The + self-fertilised capsules from the self-fertilised plants of the first + generation yielded the much lower average of 35.95 seeds; but as these + latter plants grew extremely crowded, nothing can be inferred with respect + to this difference in their self-fertility. The seedlings raised from the + above seeds constitute the plants of the fourth self-fertilised generation + in Table 4/47. + </p> + <p> + Twelve flowers on the same plants of the third self-fertilised generation, + in Table 4/46, were crossed with pollen from the crossed plants in the + same table. These crossed plants had been intercrossed for the three + previous generations; and many of them, no doubt, were more or less + closely inter-related, but not so closely as in some of the experiments + with other species; for several carnation plants had been raised and + crossed in the earlier generations. They were not related, or only in a + distant degree, to the self-fertilised plants. The parents of both the + self-fertilised and crossed plants had been subjected to as nearly as + possible the same conditions during the three previous generations. The + above twelve flowers produced ten capsules, containing on an average 48.66 + seeds, with a maximum in one of seventy-two seeds. The plants raised from + these seeds may be called the INTERCROSSED. + </p> + <p> + Lastly, twelve flowers on the same self-fertilised plants of the third + generation were crossed with pollen from plants which had been raised from + seeds purchased in London. It is almost certain that the plants which + produced these seeds had grown under very different conditions to those to + which my self-fertilised and crossed plants had been subjected; and they + were in no degree related. The above twelve flowers thus crossed all + produced capsules, but these contained the low average of 37.41 seeds per + capsule, with a maximum in one of sixty-four seeds. It is surprising that + this cross with a fresh stock did not give a much higher average number of + seeds; for, as we shall immediately see, the plants raised from these + seeds, which may be called the LONDON-CROSSED, benefited greatly by the + cross, both in growth and fertility. + </p> + <p> + The above three lots of seeds were allowed to germinate on bare sand. Many + of the London-crossed germinated before the others, and were rejected; and + many of the intercrossed later than those of the other two lots. The seeds + after thus germinating were planted in ten pots, made tripartite by + superficial divisions; but when only two kinds of seeds germinated at the + same time, they were planted on the opposite sides of other pots; and this + is indicated by blank spaces in one of the three columns in Table 4/47. A + 0 in the table signifies that the seedling died before it was measured; + and a + signifies that the plant did not produce a flower-stem, and + therefore was not measured. It deserves notice that no less than eight out + of the eighteen self-fertilised plants either died or did not flower; + whereas only three out of the eighteen intercrossed, and four out of the + twenty London-crossed plants, were in this predicament. The + self-fertilised plants had a decidedly less vigorous appearance than the + plants of the other two lots, their leaves being smaller and narrower. In + only one pot did a self-fertilised plant flower before one of the two + kinds of crossed plants, between which there was no marked difference in + the period of flowering. The plants were measured to the base of the + calyx, after they had completed their growth, late in the autumn. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/47. Dianthus caryophyllus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants to the base of the calyx, measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: London-Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Intercrossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 39 5/8 : 25 1/8 : 29 2/8. Pot 1 : 30 7/8 : 21 6/8 : +. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 36 2/8 : : 22 3/8. Pot 2 : 0 : : +. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 28 5/8 : 30 2/8 : . Pot 3 : + : 23 1/8 : . + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 33 4/8 : 35 5/8 : 30. Pot 4 : 28 7/8 : 32 : 24 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 28 : 34 4/8 : +. Pot 5 : 0 : 24 2/8 : +. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 32 5/8 : 24 7/8 : 30 3/8. Pot 6 : 31 : 26 : 24 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 41 7/8 : 29 7/8 : 27 7/8. Pot 7 : 34 7/8 : 26 4/8 : 27. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 34 5/8 : 29 : 26 6/8. Pot 8 : 28 5/8 : 0 : +. + </p> + <p> + Pot 9 : 25 5/8 : 28 5/8 : +. Pot 9 : 0 : + : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 10 : 38 : 28 4/8 : 22 7/8. Pot 10 : 32 1/8 : + : 0. + </p> + <p> + Total : 525.13 : 420.00 : 265.50. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the sixteen London-crossed plants in Table 4/47 is + 32.82 inches; that of the fifteen intercrossed plants, 28 inches; and that + of the ten self-fertilised plants, 26.55. + </p> + <p> + So that in height we have the following ratios:— + </p> + <p> + The London-crossed to the self-fertilised as 100 to 81. + </p> + <p> + The London-crossed to the intercrossed as 100 to 85. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed to the self-fertilised as 100 to 95. + </p> + <p> + These three lots of plants, which it should be remembered were all derived + on the mother-side from plants of the third self-fertilised generation, + fertilised in three different ways, were left exposed to the visits of + insects, and their flowers were freely crossed by them. As the capsules of + each lot became ripe they were gathered and kept separate, the empty or + bad ones being thrown away. But towards the middle of October, when the + capsules could no longer ripen, all were gathered and were counted, + whether good or bad. The capsules were then crushed, and the seed cleaned + by sieves and weighed. For the sake of uniformity the results are given + from calculation, as if there had been twenty plants in each lot. + </p> + <p> + The sixteen London-crossed plants actually produced 286 capsules; + therefore twenty such plants would have produced 357.5 capsules; and from + the actual weight of the seeds, the twenty plants would have yielded 462 + grains weight of seeds. + </p> + <p> + The fifteen intercrossed plants actually produced 157 capsules; therefore + twenty of them would have produced 209.3 capsules and the seeds would have + weighed 208.48 grains. + </p> + <p> + The ten self-fertilised plants actually produced 70 capsules, therefore + twenty of them would have produced 140 capsules; and the seeds would have + weighed 153.2 grains. + </p> + <p> + From these data we get the following ratios:— + </p> + <p> + NUMBER OF CAPSULES PRODUCED BY AN EQUAL NUMBER OF PLANTS OF THE THREE + LOTS. + </p> + <h3> + NUMBER OF CAPSULES: + </h3> + <p> + The London-crossed to the self-fertilised as 100 to 39. + </p> + <p> + The London-crossed to the intercrossed as 100 to 45. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed to the self-fertilised as 100 to 67. + </p> + <h3> + WEIGHT OF SEEDS PRODUCED BY AN EQUAL NUMBER OF PLANTS OF THE THREE LOTS. + </h3> + <h3> + WEIGHT OF SEED: + </h3> + <p> + The London-crossed to the self-fertilised as 100 to 33. + </p> + <p> + The London-crossed to the intercrossed as 100 to 45. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed to the self-fertilised as 100 to 73. + </p> + <p> + We thus see how greatly the offspring from the self-fertilised plants of + the third generation crossed by a fresh stock, had their fertility + increased, whether tested by the number of capsules produced or by the + weight of the contained seeds; this latter being the more trustworthy + method. Even the offspring from the self-fertilised plants crossed by one + of the crossed plants of the same stock, notwithstanding that both lots + had been long subjected to the same conditions, had their fertility + considerably increased, as tested by the same two methods. + </p> + <p> + In conclusion it may be well to repeat in reference to the fertility of + these three lots of plants, that their flowers were left freely exposed to + the visits of insects and were undoubtedly crossed by them, as may be + inferred from the large number of good capsules produced. These plants + were all the offspring of the same mother-plants, and the strongly marked + difference in their fertility must be attributed to the nature of the + pollen employed in fertilising their parents; and the difference in the + nature of the pollen must be attributed to the different treatment to + which the pollen-bearing parents had been subjected during several + previous generations. + </p> + <h3> + COLOUR OF THE FLOWERS. + </h3> + <p> + The flowers produced by the self-fertilised plants of the last or fourth + generation were as uniform in tint as those of a wild species, being of a + pale pink or rose colour. Analogous cases with Mimulus and Ipomoea, after + several generations of self-fertilisation, have been already given. The + flowers of the intercrossed plants of the fourth generation were likewise + nearly uniform in colour. On the other hand, the flowers of the + London-crossed plants, or those raised from a cross with the fresh stock + which bore dark crimson flowers, varied extremely in colour, as might have + been expected, and as is the general rule with seedling carnations. It + deserves notice that only two or three of the London-crossed plants + produced dark crimson flowers like those of their fathers, and only a very + few of a pale pink like those of their mothers. The great majority had + their petals longitudinally and variously striped with the two colours,—the + groundwork tint being, however, in some cases darker than that of the + mother-plants. + </p> + <p> + 12. MALVACEAE.—Hibiscus africanus. + </p> + <p> + Many flowers on this Hibiscus were crossed with pollen from a distinct + plant, and many others were self-fertilised. A rather larger proportional + number of the crossed than of the self-fertilised flowers yielded + capsules, and the crossed capsules contained rather more seeds. The + self-fertilised seeds were a little heavier than an equal number of the + crossed seeds, but they germinated badly, and I raised only four plants of + each lot. In three out of the four pots, the crossed plants flowered + first. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 4/48. Hibiscus africanus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 13 4/8 : 16 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 14 : 14. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 8 : 7. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 17 4/8 : 20 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 53.00 : 57.75. + </p> + <p> + The four crossed plants average 13.25, and the four self-fertilised 14.43 + inches in height; or as 100 to 109. Here we have the unusual case of + self-fertilised plants exceeding the crossed in height; but only four + pairs were measured, and these did not grow well or equally. I did not + compare the fertility of the two lots. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0005" id="link2HCH0005"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER V. GERANIACEAE, LEGUMINOSAE, ONAGRACEAE, ETC. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Pelargonium zonale, a cross between plants propagated by cuttings does + no good. + Tropaeolum minus. + Limnanthes douglasii. + Lupinus luteus and pilosus. + Phaseolus multiflorus and vulgaris. + Lathyrus odoratus, varieties of, never naturally intercross in England. + Pisum sativum, varieties of, rarely intercross, but a cross between them + highly beneficial. + Sarothamnus scoparius, wonderful effects of a cross. + Ononis minutissima, cleistogene flowers of. + Summary on the Leguminosae. + Clarkia elegans. + Bartonia aurea. + Passiflora gracilis. + Apium petroselinum. + Scabiosa atropurpurea. + Lactuca sativa. + Specularia speculum. + Lobelia ramosa, advantages of a cross during two generations. + Lobelia fulgens. + Nemophila insignis, great advantages of a cross. + Borago officinalis. + Nolana prostrata. +</pre> + <p> + 13. GERANIACEAE.—Pelargonium zonale. + </p> + <p> + This plant, as a general rule, is strongly proterandrous, and is therefore + adapted for cross-fertilisation by the aid of insects. (5/1. Mr. J. Denny, + a great raiser of new varieties of pelargoniums, after stating that this + species is proterandrous, adds ‘The Florist and Pomologist’ January 1872 + page 11, “there are some varieties, especially those with petals of a pink + colour, or which possess a weakly constitution, where the pistil expands + as soon as or even before the pollen-bag bursts, and in which also the + pistil is frequently short, so when it expands it is smothered as it were + by the bursting anthers; these varieties are great seeders, each pip being + fertilised by its own pollen. I would instance Christine as an example of + this fact.” We have here an interesting case of variability in an + important functional point.) Some flowers on a common scarlet variety were + self-fertilised, and other flowers were crossed with pollen from another + plant; but no sooner had I done so, than I remembered that these plants + had been propagated by cuttings from the same stock, and were therefore + parts in a strict sense of the same individual. Nevertheless, having made + the cross I resolved to save the seeds, which, after germinating on sand, + were planted on the opposite sides of three pots. In one pot the + quasi-crossed plant was very soon and ever afterwards taller and finer + than the self-fertilised. In the two other pots the seedlings on both + sides were for a time exactly equal; but when the self-fertilised plants + were about 10 inches in height, they surpassed their antagonists by a + little, and ever afterwards showed a more decided and increasing + advantage; so that the self-fertilised plants, taken altogether, were + somewhat superior to the quasi-crossed plants. In this case, as in that of + the Origanum, if individuals which have been asexually propagated from the + same stock, and which have been long subjected to the same conditions, are + crossed, no advantage whatever is gained. + </p> + <p> + Several flowers on another plant of the same variety were fertilised with + pollen from the younger flowers on the same plant, so as to avoid using + the old and long-shed pollen from the same flower, as I thought that this + latter might be less efficient than fresh pollen. Other flowers on the + same plant were crossed with fresh pollen from a plant which, although + closely similar, was known to have arisen as a distinct seedling. The + self-fertilised seeds germinated rather before the others; but as soon as + I got equal pairs they were planted on the opposite sides of four pots. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/49. Pelargonium zonale. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 22 3/8 : 25 5/8. Pot 1 : 19 6/8 : 12 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 15 : 19 6/8. Pot 2 : 12 2/8 : 22 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 30 5/8 : 19 4/8. Pot 3 : 18 4/8 : 7 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 38 : 9 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 156.50 : 116.38. + </p> + <p> + When the two lots of seedlings were between 4 and 5 inches in height they + were equal, excepting in Pot 4, in which the crossed plant was much the + tallest. When between 11 and 14 inches in height, they were measured to + the tips of their uppermost leaves; the crossed averaged 13.46, and the + self-fertilised 11.07 inches in height, or as 100 to 82. Five months later + they were again measured in the same manner, and the results are given in + Table 5/49. + </p> + <p> + The seven crossed plants now averaged 22.35, and the seven self-fertilised + 16.62 inches in height, or as 100 to 74. But from the great inequality of + the several plants, the result is less trustworthy than in most other + cases. In Pot 2 the two self-fertilised plants always had an advantage, + except whilst quite young over the two crossed plants. + </p> + <p> + As I wished to ascertain how these plants would behave during a second + growth, they were cut down close to the ground whilst growing freely. The + crossed plants now showed their superiority in another way, for only one + out of the seven was killed by the operation, whilst three of the + self-fertilised plants never recovered. There was, therefore, no use in + keeping any of the plants excepting those in Pots 1 and 3; and in the + following year the crossed plants in these two pots showed during their + second growth nearly the same relative superiority over the + self-fertilised plants as before. + </p> + <p> + Tropaeolum minus. + </p> + <p> + The flowers are proterandrous, and are manifestly adapted for + cross-fertilisation by insects, as shown by Sprengel and Delpino. Twelve + flowers on some plants growing out of doors were crossed with pollen from + a distinct plant and produced eleven capsules, containing altogether + twenty-four good seeds. Eighteen flowers were fertilised with their own + pollen and produced only eleven capsules, containing twenty-two good + seeds; so that a much larger proportion of the crossed than of the + self-fertilised flowers produced capsules, and the crossed capsules + contained rather more seed than the self-fertilised in the ratio of 100 to + 92. The seeds from the self-fertilised capsules were however the heavier + of the two, in the ratio of 100 to 87. + </p> + <p> + Seeds in an equal state of germination were planted on the opposite sides + of four pots, but only the two tallest plants on each side of each pot + were measured to the tops of their stems. The pots were placed in the + greenhouse, and the plants trained up sticks, so that they ascended to an + unusual height. In three of the pots the crossed plants flowered first, + but in the fourth at the same time with the self-fertilised. When the + seedlings were between 6 and 7 inches in height, the crossed began to show + a slight advantage over their opponents. When grown to a considerable + height the eight tallest crossed plants averaged 44.43, and the eight + tallest self-fertilised plants 37.34 inches, or as 100 to 84. When their + growth was completed they were again measured, as shown in Table 5/50. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/50. Tropaeolum minus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 65 : 31. Pot 1 : 50 : 45. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 69 : 42. Pot 2 : 35 : 45. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 70 : 50 4/8. Pot 3 : 59 4/8 : 55 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 61 4/8 : 37 4/8. Pot 4 : 57 4/8 : 61 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 467.5 : 368.0. + </p> + <p> + The eight tallest crossed plants now averaged 58.43, and the eight tallest + self-fertilised plants 46 inches in height, or as 100 to 79. + </p> + <p> + There was also a great difference in the fertility of the two lots which + were left uncovered in the greenhouse. On the 17th of September the + capsules from all the plants were gathered, and the seeds counted. The + crossed plants yielded 243, whilst the same number of self-fertilised + plants yielded only 155 seeds, or as 100 to 64. + </p> + <p> + Limnanthes douglasii. + </p> + <p> + Several flowers were crossed and self-fertilised in the usual manner, but + there was no marked difference in the number of seeds which they yielded. + A vast number of spontaneously self-fertilised capsules were also produced + under the net. Seedlings were raised in five pots from the above seeds, + and when the crossed were about 3 inches in height they showed a slight + advantage over the self-fertilised. When double this height, the sixteen + crossed and sixteen self-fertilised plants were measured to the tips of + their leaves; the former averaged 7.3 inches, and the self-fertilised 6.07 + inches in height, or as 100 to 83. In all the pots, excepting 4, a crossed + plant flowered before any one of the self-fertilised plants. The plants, + when fully grown, were again measured to the summits of their ripe + capsules, with the result in Table 5/51. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/51. Limnanthes douglasii. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants to the summits of their ripe capsules, measured in + inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 17 7/8 : 15 1/8. Pot 1 : 17 6/8 : 16 4/8. Pot 1 : 13 : 11. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 20 : 14 4/8. Pot 2 : 22 : 15 6/8. Pot 2 : 21 : 16 1/8. Pot 2 : 18 + 4/8 : 17. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 15 6/8 : 11 4/8. Pot 3 : 17 2/8 : 10 4/8. Pot 3 : 14 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 20 4/8 : 13 4/8. Pot 4 : 14 : 13. Pot 4 : 18 : 12 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 17 : 14 2/8. Pot 5 : 18 5/8 : 14 1/8. Pot 5 : 14 2/8 : 12 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 279.50 : 207.75. + </p> + <p> + The sixteen crossed plants now averaged 17.46, and the fifteen (for one + had died) self-fertilised plants 13.85 inches in height, or as 100 to 79. + Mr. Galton considers that a higher ratio would be fairer, namely, 100 to + 76. He made a graphical representation of the above measurements, and adds + the words “very good” to the curvature thus formed. Both lots of plants + produced an abundance of seed-capsules, and, as far as could be judged by + the eye, there was no difference in their fertility.] + </p> + <h3> + 14. LEGUMINOSAE. + </h3> + <p> + In this family I experimented on the following six genera, Lupinus, + Phaseolus, Lathyrus, Pisum, Sarothamnus, and Ononis. + </p> + <p> + [Lupinus luteus. (5/2. The structure of the flowers of this plant, and + their manner of fertilisation, have been described by H. Muller + ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 243. The flowers do not secrete free nectar, and + bees generally visit them for their pollen. Mr. Farrer, however, remarks + ‘Nature’ 1872 page 499, that “there is a cavity at the back and base of + the vexillum, in which I have not been able to find nectar. But the bees, + which constantly visit these flowers, certainly go to this cavity for what + they want, and not to the staminal tube.”) + </p> + <p> + A few flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant, but owing to + the unfavourable season only two crossed seeds were produced. Nine seeds + were saved from flowers spontaneously self-fertilised under a net, on the + same plant which yielded the two crossed seeds. One of these crossed seeds + was sown in a pot with two self-fertilised seeds on the opposite side; the + latter came up between two and three days before the crossed seed. The + second crossed seed was sown in like manner with two self-fertilised seeds + on the opposite side; these latter also came up about a day before the + crossed one. In both pots, therefore, the crossed seedlings from + germinating later, were at first completely beaten by the self-fertilised; + nevertheless, this state of things was afterwards completely reversed. The + seeds were sown late in the autumn, and the pots, which were much too + small, were kept in the greenhouse. The plants in consequence grew badly, + and the self-fertilised suffered most in both pots. The two crossed plants + when in flower during the following spring were 9 inches in height; one of + the self-fertilised plants was 8, and the three others only 3 inches in + height, being thus mere dwarfs. The two crossed plants produced thirteen + pods, whilst the four self-fertilised plants produced only a single one. + Some other self-fertilised plants which had been raised separately in + larger pots produced several spontaneously self-fertilised pods under a + net, and seeds from these were used in the following experiment. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + The spontaneously self-fertilised seeds just mentioned, and crossed seeds + obtained by intercrossing the two crossed plants of the last generation, + after germinating on sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of + three large pots. When the seedlings were only 4 inches in height, the + crossed had a slight advantage over their opponents. When grown to their + full height, every one of the crossed plants exceeded its opponent in + height. Nevertheless the self-fertilised plants in all three pots flowered + before the crossed! The measurements are given in Table 5/52. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/52. Lupinus luteus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 33 2/8 : 24 4/8. Pot 1 : 30 4/8 : 18 4/8. Pot 1 : 30 : 28. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 29 4/8 : 26. Pot 2 : 30 : 25. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 30 4/8 : 28. Pot 3 : 31 : 27 2/8. Pot 3 : 31 4/8 : 24 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 246.25 : 201.75. + </p> + <p> + The eight crossed plants here average 30.78, and the eight self-fertilised + 25.21 inches in height; or as 100 to 82. These plants were left uncovered + in the greenhouse to set their pods, but they produced very few good ones, + perhaps in part owing to few bees visiting them. The crossed plants + produced nine pods, containing on an average 3.4 seeds, and the + self-fertilised plants seven pods, containing on an average 3 seeds, so + that the seeds from an equal number of plants were as 100 to 88. + </p> + <p> + Two other crossed seedlings, each with two self-fertilised seedlings on + the opposite sides of the same large pot, were turned out of their pots + early in the season, without being disturbed, into open ground of good + quality. They were thus subjected to but little competition with one + another, in comparison with the plants in the above three pots. In the + autumn the two crossed plants were about 3 inches taller than the four + self-fertilised plants; they looked also more vigorous and produced many + more pods. + </p> + <p> + Two other crossed and self-fertilised seeds of the same lot, after + germinating on sand, were planted on the opposite sides of a large pot, in + which a Calceolaria had long been growing, and were therefore exposed to + unfavourable conditions: the two crossed plants ultimately attained a + height of 20 1/2 and 20 inches, whilst the two self-fertilised were only + 18 and 9 1/2 inches high. + </p> + <p> + Lupinus pilosus. + </p> + <p> + From a series of accidents I was again unfortunate in obtaining a + sufficient number of crossed seedlings; and the following results would + not be worth giving, did they not strictly accord with those just given + with respect to Lupinus luteus. I raised at first only a single crossed + seedling, which was placed in competition with two self-fertilised ones on + the opposite side of the same pot. These plants, without being disturbed, + were soon afterwards turned into the open ground. By the autumn the + crossed plant had grown to so large a size that it almost smothered the + two self-fertilised plants, which were mere dwarfs; and the latter died + without maturing a single pod. Several self-fertilised seeds had been + planted at the same time separately in the open ground; and the two + tallest of these were 33 and 32 inches, whereas the one crossed plant was + 38 inches in height. This latter plant also produced many more pods than + did any one of the self-fertilised plants, although growing separately. A + few flowers on the one crossed plant were crossed with pollen from one of + the self-fertilised plants, for I had no other crossed plant from which to + obtain pollen. One of the self-fertilised plants having been covered by a + net produced plenty of spontaneously self-fertilised pods. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + From crossed and self-fertilised seeds obtained in the manner just + described, I succeeded in raising to maturity only a pair of plants, which + were kept in a pot in the greenhouse. The crossed plant grew to a height + of 33 inches, and the self-fertilised to that of 26 1/2 inches. The former + produced, whilst still kept in the greenhouse, eight pods, containing on + an average 2.77 seeds; and the latter only two pods, containing on an + average 2.5 seeds. The average height of the two crossed plants of the two + generations taken together was 35.5, and that of the three self-fertilised + plants of the same two generations 30.5; or as 100 to 86. (5/3. We here + see that both Lupinus luteus and pilosus seed freely when insects are + excluded; but Mr. Swale, of Christchurch, in New Zealand, informs me + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1858 page 828, that the garden varieties of the + lupine are not there visited by any bees, and that they seed less freely + than any other introduced leguminous plant, with the exception of red + clover. He adds “I have, for amusement, during the summer, released the + stamens with a pin, and a pod of seed has always rewarded me for my + trouble, the adjoining flowers not so served having all proved blind.” I + do not know to what species this statement refers.) + </p> + <p> + Phaseolus multiflorus. + </p> + <p> + This plant, the scarlet-runner of English gardeners and the Phaseolus + coccineus of Lamarck, originally came from Mexico, as I am informed by Mr. + Bentham. The flowers are so constructed that hive and humble-bees, which + visit them incessantly, almost always alight on the left wing-petal, as + they can best suck the nectar from this side. Their weight and movements + depress the petal, and this causes the stigma to protrude from the + spirally-wound keel, and a brush of hairs round the stigma pushes out the + pollen before it. The pollen adheres to the head or proboscis of the bee + which is at work, and is thus placed either on the stigma of the same + flower, or is carried to another flower. (5/4. The flowers have been + described by Delpino, and in an admirable manner by Mr. Farrer in the + ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ volume 2 4th series October 1868 + page 256. My son Francis has explained ‘Nature’ January 8, 1874 page 189, + the use of one peculiarity in their structure, namely, a little vertical + projection on the single free stamen near its base, which seems placed as + if to guard the entrance into the two nectar-holes in the staminal sheath. + He shows that this projection prevents the bees reaching the nectar, + unless they go to the left side of the flower, and it is absolutely + necessary for cross-fertilisation that they should alight on the left + wing-petal.) Several years ago I covered some plants under a large net, + and these produced on one occasion about one-third, and on another + occasion about one-eighth, of the number of pods which the same number of + uncovered plants growing close alongside produced. (5/5. ‘Gardeners’ + Chronicle’ 1857 page 725 and more especially ibid 1858 page 828. Also + ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ 3rd series volume 2 1858 page + 462.) This lessened fertility was not caused by any injury from the net, + as I moved the wing-petals of several protected flowers, in the same + manner as bees do, and these produced remarkably fine pods. When the net + was taken off, the flowers were immediately visited by bees, and it was + interesting to observe how quickly the plants became covered with young + pods. As the flowers are much frequented by Thrips, the self-fertilisation + of most of the flowers under the net may have been due to the action of + these minute insects. Dr. Ogle likewise covered up a large portion of a + plant, and “out of a vast number of blossoms thus protected not a single + one produced a pod, while the unprotected blossoms were for the most part + fruitful.” Mr. Belt gives a more curious case; this plant grows well and + flowers in Nicaragua; but as none of the native bees visit the flowers, + not a single pod is ever produced. (5/6. Dr. Ogle ‘Popular Science Review’ + 1870 page 168. Mr. Belt ‘The Naturalist in Nicaragua’ 1874 page 70. The + latter author gives a case ‘Nature’ 1875 page 26, of a late crop of + Phaseolus multiflorus near London which “was rendered barren” by the + humble-bees cutting, as they frequently do, holes at the bases of the + flowers instead of entering them in the proper manner.) + </p> + <p> + From the facts now given we may feel nearly sure that individuals of the + same variety or of different varieties, if growing near each other and in + flower at the same time, would intercross; but I cannot myself advance any + direct evidence of such an occurrence, as only a single variety is + commonly cultivated in England. I have, however, received an account from + the Reverend W.A. Leighton, that plants raised by him from ordinary seed + produced seeds differing in an extraordinary manner in colour and shape, + leading to the belief that their parents must have been crossed. In France + M. Fermond more than once planted close together varieties which + ordinarily come true and which bear differently coloured flowers and + seeds; and the offspring thus raised varied so greatly that there could + hardly be a doubt that they had intercrossed. (5/7. ‘Fécondation chez les + Végétaux’ 1859 pages 34-40. He adds that M. Villiers has described a + spontaneous hybrid, which he calls Phaseolus coccineus hybridus, in the + ‘Annales de la Soc. R. de Horticulture’ June 1844.) On the other hand, + Professor H. Hoffman does not believe in the natural crossing of the + varieties; for although seedlings raised from two varieties growing close + together produced plants which yielded seeds of a mixed character, he + found that this likewise occurred with plants separated by a space of from + 40 to 150 paces from any other variety; he therefore attributes the mixed + character of the seed to spontaneous variability. (5/8. ‘Bestimmung des + Werthes von Species und Varietat’ 1869 pages 47-72.) But the above + distance would be very far from sufficient to prevent intercrossing: + cabbages have been known to cross at several times this distance; and the + careful Gartner gives many instances of plants growing at from 600 to 800 + yards apart fertilising one another. (5/9. ‘Kenntnis der Befruchtung’ 1844 + pages 573, 577.) Professor Hoffman even maintains that the flowers of the + kidney-bean are specially adapted for self-fertilisation. He enclosed + several flowers in bags; and as the buds often dropped off, he attributes + the partial sterility of these flowers to the injurious effects of the + bags, and not to the exclusion of insects. But the only safe method of + experimenting is to cover up a whole plant, which then never suffers. + </p> + <p> + Self-fertilised seeds were obtained by moving up and down in the same + manner as bees do the wing-petals of flowers protected by a net; and + crossed seeds were obtained by crossing two of the plants under the same + net. The seeds after germinating on sand were planted on the opposite + sides of two large pots, and equal-sized sticks were given them to twine + up. When 8 inches in height, the plants on the two sides were equal. The + crossed plants flowered before the self-fertilised in both pots. As soon + as one of each pair had grown to the summit of its stick both were + measured. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/53. Phaseolus multiflorus. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 87 : 84 6/8. Pot 1 : 88 : 87. Pot 1 : 82 4/8 : 76. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 90 : 76 4/8. Pot 2 : 82 4/8 : 87 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 430.00 : 411.75. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the five crossed plants is 86 inches, and that of + the five self-fertilised plants 82.35; or as 100 to 96. The pots were kept + in the greenhouse, and there was little or no difference in the fertility + of the two lots. Therefore as far as these few observations serve, the + advantage gained by a cross is very small. + </p> + <p> + Phaseolus vulgaris. + </p> + <p> + With respect to this species, I merely ascertained that the flowers were + highly fertile when insects were excluded, as indeed must be the case, for + the plants are often forced during the winter when no insects are present. + Some plants of two varieties (namely Canterbury and Fulmer’s Forcing Bean) + were covered with a net, and they seemed to produce as many pods, + containing as many beans, as some uncovered plants growing alongside; but + neither the pods nor the beans were actually counted. This difference in + self-fertility between Phaseolus vulgaris and multifloris is remarkable, + as these two species are so closely related that Linnaeus thought that + they formed one. When the varieties of Phaseolus vulgaris grow near one + another in the open ground, they sometimes cross largely, notwithstanding + their capacity for self-fertilisation. Mr. Coe has given me a remarkable + instance of this fact with respect to the negro and a white-seeded and a + brown-seeded variety, which were all grown together. The diversity of + character in the seedlings of the second generation raised by me from his + plants was wonderful. I could add other analogous cases, and the fact is + well-known to gardeners. (5/10. I have given Mr. Coe’s case in the + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1858 page 829. See also for another case ibid page + 845.) + </p> + <p> + Lathyrus odoratus. + </p> + <p> + Almost everyone who has studied the structure of papilionaceous flowers + has been convinced that they are specially adapted for + cross-fertilisation, although many of the species are likewise capable of + self-fertilisation. The case therefore of Lathyrus odoratus or the + sweet-pea is curious, for in this country it seems invariably to fertilise + itself. I conclude that this is so, as five varieties, differing greatly + in the colour of their flowers but in no other respect, are commonly sold + and come true; yet on inquiry from two great raisers of seed for sale, I + find that they take no precautions to insure purity—the five + varieties being habitually grown close together. (5/11. See Mr. W. Earley + in ‘Nature’ 1872 page 242, to the same effect. He once, however, saw bees + visiting the flowers, and supposed that on this occasion they would have + been intercrossed.) I have myself purposely made similar trials with the + same result. Although the varieties always come true, yet, as we shall + presently see, one of the five well-known varieties occasionally gives + birth to another, which exhibits all its usual characters. Owing to this + curious fact, and to the darker-coloured varieties being the most + productive, these increase, to the exclusion of the others, as I was + informed by the late Mr. Masters, if there be no selection. + </p> + <p> + In order to ascertain what would be the effect of crossing two varieties, + some flowers on the Purple sweet-pea, which has a dark reddish-purple + standard-petal with violet-coloured wing-petals and keel, were castrated + whilst very young, and were fertilised with pollen of the Painted Lady. + This latter variety has a pale cherry-coloured standard, with almost white + wings and keel. On two occasions I raised from a flower thus crossed + plants perfectly resembling both parent-forms; but the greater number + resembled the paternal variety. So perfect was the resemblance, that I + should have suspected some mistake in the label, had not the plants, which + were at first identical in appearance with the father or Painted Lady, + later in the season produced flowers blotched and streaked with dark + purple. This is an interesting example of partial reversion in the same + individual plant as it grows older. The purple-flowered plants were thrown + away, as they might possibly have been the product of the accidental + self-fertilisation of the mother-plant, owing to the castration not having + been effectual. But the plants which resembled in the colour of their + flowers the paternal variety or Painted Lady were preserved, and their + seeds saved. Next summer many plants were raised from these seeds, and + they generally resembled their grandfather the Painted Lady, but most of + them had their wing-petals streaked and stained with dark pink; and a few + had pale purple wings with the standard of a darker crimson than is + natural to the Painted Lady, so that they formed a new sub-variety. + Amongst these plants a single one appeared having purple flowers like + those of the grandmother, but with the petals slightly streaked with a + paler tint: this was thrown away. Seeds were again saved from the + foregoing plants, and the seedlings thus raised still resembled the + Painted Lady, or great-grandfather; but they now varied much, the standard + petal varying from pale to dark red, in a few instances with blotches of + white; and the wing-petals varied from nearly white to purple, the keel + being in all nearly white. + </p> + <p> + As no variability of this kind can be detected in plants raised from + seeds, the parents of which have grown during many successive generations + in close proximity, we may infer that they cannot have intercrossed. What + does occasionally occur is that in a row of plants raised from seeds of + one variety, another variety true of its kind appears; for instance, in a + long row of Scarlets (the seeds of which had been carefully gathered from + Scarlets for the sake of this experiment) two Purples and one Painted Lady + appeared. Seeds from these three aberrant plants were saved and sown in + separate beds. The seedlings from both the Purples were chiefly Purples, + but with some Painted Ladies and some Scarlets. The seedlings from the + aberrant Painted Lady were chiefly Painted Ladies with some Scarlets. Each + variety, whatever its parentage may have been, retained all its characters + perfect, and there was no streaking or blotching of the colours, as in the + foregoing plants of crossed origin. Another variety, however, is often + sold, which is striped and blotched with dark purple; and this is probably + of crossed origin, for I found, as well as Mr. Masters, that it did not + transmit its characters at all truly. + </p> + <p> + From the evidence now given, we may conclude that the varieties of the + sweet-pea rarely or never intercross in this country; and this is a highly + remarkable fact, considering, firstly, the general structure of the + flowers; secondly, the large quantity of pollen produced, far more than is + requisite for self-fertilisation; and thirdly, the occasional visit of + insects. That insects should sometimes fail to cross-fertilise the flowers + is intelligible, for I have thrice seen humble-bees of two kinds, as well + as hive-bees, sucking the nectar, and they did not depress the keel-petals + so as to expose the anthers and stigma; they were therefore quite + inefficient for fertilising the flowers. One of these bees, namely, Bombus + lapidarius, stood on one side at the base of the standard and inserted its + proboscis beneath the single separate stamen, as I afterwards ascertained + by opening the flower and finding this stamen prised up. Bees are forced + to act in this manner from the slit in the staminal tube being closely + covered by the broad membranous margin of the single stamen, and from the + tube not being perforated by nectar-passages. On the other hand, in the + three British species of Lathyrus which I have examined, and in the allied + genus Vicia, two nectar-passages are present. Therefore British bees might + well be puzzled how to act in the case of the sweet-pea. I may add that + the staminal tube of another exotic species, Lathyrus grandiflorus, is not + perforated by nectar-passages, and this species has rarely set any pods in + my garden, unless the wing-petals were moved up and down, in the same + manner as bees ought to do; and then pods were generally formed, but from + some cause often dropped off afterwards. One of my sons caught an elephant + sphinx-moth whilst visiting the flowers of the sweet-pea, but this insect + would not depress the wing-petals and keel. On the other hand, I have seen + on one occasion hive-bees, and two or three occasions the Megachile + willughbiella in the act of depressing the keel; and these bees had the + under sides of their bodies thickly covered with pollen, and could not + thus fail to carry pollen from one flower to the stigma of another. Why + then do not the varieties occasionally intercross, though this would not + often happen, as insects so rarely act in an efficient manner? The fact + cannot, as it appears, be explained by the flowers being self-fertilised + at a very early age; for although nectar is sometimes secreted and pollen + adheres to the viscid stigma before the flowers are fully expanded, yet in + five young flowers which were examined by me the pollen-tubes were not + exserted. Whatever the cause may be, we may conclude, that in England the + varieties never or very rarely intercross. But it does not follow from + this, that they would not be cross by the aid of other and larger insects + in their native country, which in botanical works is said to be the south + of Europe and the East Indies. Accordingly I wrote to Professor Delpino, + in Florence, and he informs me “that it is the fixed opinion of gardeners + there that the varieties do intercross, and that they cannot be preserved + pure unless they are sown separately.” + </p> + <p> + It follows also from the foregoing facts that the several varieties of the + sweet-pea must have propagated themselves in England by self-fertilisation + for very many generations, since the time when each new variety first + appeared. From the analogy of the plants of Mimulus and Ipomoea, which had + been self-fertilised for several generations, and from trials previously + made with the common pea, which is in nearly the same state as the + sweet-pea, it appeared to me very improbable that a cross between the + individuals of the same variety would benefit the offspring. A cross of + this kind was therefore not tried, which I now regret. But some flowers of + the Painted Lady, castrated at an early age, were fertilised with pollen + from the Purple sweet-pea; and it should be remembered that these + varieties differ in nothing except in the colour of their flowers. The + cross was manifestly effectual (though only two seeds were obtained), as + was shown by the two seedlings, when they flowered, closely resembling + their father, the Purple pea, excepting that they were a little lighter + coloured, with their keels slightly streaked with pale purple. Seeds from + flowers spontaneously self-fertilised under a net were at the same time + saved from the same mother-plant, the Painted Lady. These seeds + unfortunately did not germinate on sand at the same time with the crossed + seeds, so that they could not be planted simultaneously. One of the two + crossed seeds in a state of germination was planted in a pot (Number 1) in + which a self-fertilised seed in the same state had been planted four days + before, so that this latter seedling had a great advantage over the + crossed one. In Pot 2 the other crossed seed was planted two days before a + self-fertilised one; so that here the crossed seedling had a considerable + advantage over the self-fertilised one. But this crossed seedling had its + summit gnawed off by a slug, and was in consequence for a time quite + beaten by the self-fertilised plant. Nevertheless I allowed it to remain, + and so great was its constitutional vigour that it ultimately beat its + uninjured self-fertilised rival. When all four plants were almost fully + grown they were measured, as here shown:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/54. Lathyrus odoratus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 80 : 64 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 78 4/8 : 63. + </p> + <p> + Total : 158.5 : 127.5. + </p> + <p> + The two crossed plants here average 79.25, and the two self-fertilised + 63.75 inches in height, or as 100 to 80. Six flowers on these two crossed + plants were reciprocally crossed with pollen from the other plant, and the + six pods thus produced contained on an average six peas, with a maximum in + one of seven. Eighteen spontaneously self-fertilised pods from the Painted + Lady, which, as already stated, had no doubt been self-fertilised for many + previous generations, contained on an average only 3.93 peas, with a + maximum in one of five peas; so that the number of peas in the crossed and + self-fertilised pods was as 100 to 65. The self-fertilised peas were, + however, quite as heavy as those from the crossed pods. From these two + lots of seeds, the plants of the next generation were raised. + </p> + <h3> + PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Many of the self-fertilised peas just referred to germinated on sand + before any of the crossed ones, and were rejected. As soon as I got equal + pairs, they were planted on the opposite sides of two large pots, which + were kept in the greenhouse. The seedlings thus raised were the + grandchildren of the Painted Lady, which was first crossed by the Purple + variety. When the two lots were from 4 to 6 inches in height there was no + difference between them. Nor was there any marked difference in the period + of their flowering. When fully grown they were measured, as follows:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/55. Lathyrus odoratus (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Seedlings from Plants Crossed during the two previous + Generations. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Seedlings from Plants Self-fertilised during many previous + Generations. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 72 4/8 : 57 4/8. Pot 1 : 71 : 67. Pot 1 : 52 2/8 : 56 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 81 4/8 : 66 2/8. Pot 2 : 45 2/8 : 38 7/8. Pot 2 : 55 : 46. + </p> + <p> + Total : 377.50 : 331.86. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the six crossed plants is here 62.91, and that of + the six self-fertilised 55.31 inches; or as 100 to 88. There was not much + difference in the fertility of the two lots; the crossed plants having + produced in the greenhouse thirty-five pods, and the self-fertilised + thirty-two pods. + </p> + <p> + Seeds were saved from the self-fertilised flowers on these two lots of + plants, for the sake of ascertaining whether the seedlings thus raised + would inherit any difference in growth or vigour. It must therefore be + understood that both lots in the following trial are plants of + self-fertilised parentage; but that in the one lot the plants were the + children of plants which had been crossed during two previous generations, + having been before that self-fertilised for many generations; and that in + the other lot they were the children of plants which had not been crossed + for very many previous generations. The seeds germinated on sand and were + planted in pairs on the opposite sides of four pots. They were measured, + when fully grown, with the following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/56. Lathyrus odoratus. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants from Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants from Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 72 : 65. Pot 1 : 72 : 61 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 58 : 64. Pot 2 : 68 : 68 2/8. Pot 2 : 72 4/8 : 56 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 81 : 60 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 77 4/8 : 76 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 501 : 452. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the seven self-fertilised plants, the offspring of + crossed plants, is 71.57, and that of the seven self-fertilised plants, + the offspring of self-fertilised plants, is 64.57; or as 100 to 90. The + self-fertilised plants from the self-fertilised produced rather more pods—namely, + thirty-six—than the self-fertilised plants from the crossed, for + these produced only thirty-one pods. + </p> + <p> + A few seeds of the same two lots were sown in the opposite corners of a + large box in which a Brugmansia had long been growing, and in which the + soil was so exhausted that seeds of Ipomoea purpurea would hardly + vegetate; yet the two plants of the sweet-pea which were raised flourished + well. For a long time the self-fertilised plant from the self-fertilised + beat the self-fertilised plant from the crossed plant; the former flowered + first, and was at one time 77 1/2 inches, whilst the latter was only 68 + 1/2 in height; but ultimately the plant from the previous cross showed its + superiority and attained a height of 108 1/2 inches, whilst the other was + only 95 inches. I also sowed some of the same two lots of seeds in poor + soil in a shady place in a shrubbery. Here again the self-fertilised + plants from the self-fertilised for a long time exceeded considerably in + height those from the previously crossed plants; and this may probably be + attributed, in the present as in the last case, to these seeds having + germinated rather sooner than those from the crossed plants; but at the + close of the season the tallest of the self-fertilised plants from the + crossed plants was 30 inches, whilst the tallest of the self-fertilised + from the self-fertilised was 29 3/8 inches in height. + </p> + <p> + From the various facts now given we see that plants derived from a cross + between two varieties of the sweet-pea, which differ in no respect except + in the colour of their flowers, exceed considerably in height the + offspring from self-fertilised plants, both in the first and second + generations. The crossed plants also transmit their superiority in height + and vigour to their self-fertilised offspring. + </p> + <p> + Pisum sativum. + </p> + <p> + The common pea is perfectly fertile when its flowers are protected from + the visits of insects; I ascertained this with two or three different + varieties, as did Dr. Ogle with another. But the flowers are likewise + adapted for cross-fertilisation; Mr. Farrer specifies the following + points, namely: “The open blossom displaying itself in the most attractive + and convenient position for insects; the conspicuous vexillum; the wings + forming an alighting place; the attachment of the wings to the keel, by + which any body pressing on the former must press down the latter; the + staminal tube enclosing nectar, and affording by means of its partially + free stamen with apertures on each side of its base an open passage to an + insect seeking the nectar; the moist and sticky pollen placed just where + it will be swept out of the apex of the keel against the entering insect; + the stiff elastic style so placed that on a pressure being applied to the + keel it will be pushed upwards out of the keel; the hairs on the style + placed on that side of the style only on which there is space for the + pollen, and in such a direction as to sweep it out; and the stigma so + placed as to meet an entering insect,—all these become correlated + parts of one elaborate mechanism, if we suppose that the fertilisation of + these flowers is effected by the carriage of pollen from one to the + other.” (5/12. ‘Nature’ October 10, 1872 page 479. Hermann Muller gives an + elaborate description of the flowers ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 247.) + Notwithstanding these manifest provisions for cross-fertilisation, + varieties which have been cultivated for very many successive generations + in close proximity, although flowering at the same time, remain pure. I + have elsewhere given evidence on this head, and if required could give + more. (5/13. ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication’ chapter + 9 2nd edition volume 1 page 348.) There can hardly be a doubt that some of + Knight’s varieties, which were originally produced by an artificial cross + and were very vigorous, lasted for at least sixty years, and during all + these years were self-fertilised; for had it been otherwise, they would + not have kept true, as the several varieties are generally grown near + together. Most of the varieties, however, endure for a shorter period; and + this may be in part due to their weakness of constitution from + long-continued self-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + It is remarkable, considering that the flowers secrete much nectar and + afford much pollen, how seldom they are visited by insects either in + England, or, as H. Muller remarks, in North Germany. I have observed the + flowers for the last thirty years, and in all this time have only thrice + seen bees of the proper kind at work (one of them being Bombus muscorum), + such as were sufficiently powerful to depress the keel, so as to get the + undersides of their bodies dusted with pollen. These bees visited several + flowers, and could hardly have failed to cross-fertilise them. Hive-bees + and other small kinds sometimes collect pollen from old and already + fertilised flowers, but this is of no account. The rarity of the visits of + efficient bees to this exotic plant is, I believe, the chief cause of the + varieties so seldom intercrossing. That a cross does occasionally take + place, as might be expected from what has just been stated, is certain, + from the recorded cases of the direct action of the pollen of one variety + on the seed-coats of another. (5/14. ‘Variation of Animals and Plants + under Domestication’ chapter 11 2nd edition volume 1 page 428.) The late + Mr. Masters, who particularly attended to the raising of new varieties of + peas, was convinced that some of them had originated from accidental + crosses. But as such crosses are rare, the old varieties would not often + be thus deteriorated, more especially as plants departing from the proper + type are generally rejected by those who collect seed for sale. There is + another cause which probably tends to render cross-fertilisation rare, + namely, the early age at which the pollen-tubes are exserted; eight + flowers not fully expanded were examined, and in seven of these the + pollen-tubes were in this state; but they had not as yet penetrated the + stigma. Although so few insects visit the flowers of the pea in this + country or in North Germany, and although the anthers seem here to open + abnormally soon, it does not follow that the species in its native country + would be thus circumstanced. + </p> + <p> + Owing to the varieties having been self-fertilised for many generations, + and to their having been subjected in each generation to nearly the same + conditions (as will be explained in a future chapter) I did not expect + that a cross between two such plants would benefit the offspring; and so + it proved on trial. In 1867 I covered up several plants of the Early + Emperor pea, which was not then a very new variety, so that it must + already have been propagated by self-fertilisation for at least a dozen + generations. Some flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant + growing in the same row, and others were allowed to fertilise themselves + under a net. The two lots of seeds thus obtained were sown on opposite + sides of two large pots, but only four pairs came up at the same time. The + pots were kept in the greenhouse. The seedlings of both lots when between + 6 and 7 inches in height were equal. When nearly full-grown they were + measured, as in Table 5/57. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/57. Pisum sativum. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 35 : 29 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 31 4/8 : 51. Pot 2 : 35 : 45. Pot 2 : 37 : 33. + </p> + <p> + Total : 138.50 : 158.75. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the four crossed plants is here 34.62, and that of + the four self-fertilised plants 39.68, or as 100 to 115. So that the + crossed plants, far from beating the self-fertilised, were completely + beaten by them. + </p> + <p> + There can be no doubt that the result would have been widely different, if + any two varieties out of the numberless ones which exist had been crossed. + Notwithstanding that both had been self-fertilised for many previous + generations, each would almost certainly have possessed its own peculiar + constitution; and this degree of differentiation would have been + sufficient to make a cross highly beneficial. I have spoken thus + confidently of the benefit which would have been derived from crossing any + two varieties of the pea from the following facts: Andrew Knight in + speaking of the results of crossing reciprocally very tall and short + varieties, says, “I had in this experiment a striking instance of the + stimulative effects of crossing the breeds; for the smallest variety, + whose height rarely exceeded 2 feet, was increased to 6 feet; whilst the + height of the large and luxuriant kind was very little diminished.” (5/15. + ‘Philosophical Transactions’ 1799 page 200.) Recently Mr. Laxton has made + numerous crosses, and everyone had been astonished at the vigour and + luxuriance of the new varieties which he has thus raised and afterwards + fixed by selection. He gave me seed-peas produced from crosses between + four distinct kinds; and the plants thus raised were extraordinarily + vigorous, being in each case from 1 to 2 or even 3 feet taller than the + parent-forms, which were raised at the same time close alongside. But as I + did not measure their actual height I cannot give the exact ratio, but it + must have been at least as 100 to 75. A similar trial was subsequently + made with two other peas from a different cross, and the result was nearly + the same. For instance, a crossed seedling between the Maple and + Purple-podded pea was planted in poor soil and grew to the extraordinary + height of 116 inches; whereas the tallest plant of either parent variety, + namely, a Purple-podded pea, was only 70 inches in height; or as 100 to + 60. + </p> + <p> + Sarothamnus scoparius. + </p> + <p> + Bees incessantly visit the flowers of the common Broom, and these are + adapted by a curious mechanism for cross-fertilisation. When a bee alights + on the wing-petals of a young flower, the keel is slightly opened and the + short stamens spring out, which rub their pollen against the abdomen of + the bee. If a rather older flower is visited for the first time (or if the + bee exerts great force on a younger flower), the keel opens along its + whole length, and the longer as well as the shorter stamens, together with + the much elongated curved pistil, spring forth with violence. The + flattened, spoon-like extremity of the pistil rests for a time on the back + of the bee, and leaves on it the load of pollen with which it is charged. + As soon as the bee flies away, the pistil instantly curls round, so that + the stigmatic surface is now upturned and occupies a position, in which it + would be rubbed against the abdomen of another bee visiting the same + flower. Thus, when the pistil first escapes from the keel, the stigma is + rubbed against the back of the bee, dusted with pollen from the longer + stamens, either of the same or another flower; and afterwards against the + lower surface of the bee dusted with pollen from the shorter stamens, + which is often shed a day or two before that from the longer stamens. + (5/16. These observations have been quoted in an abbreviated form by the + Reverend G. Henslow, in the ‘Journal of Linnean Society Botany’ volume 9 + 1866 page 358. Hermann Muller has since published a full and excellent + account of the flower in his ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 240.) By this + mechanism cross-fertilisation is rendered almost inevitable, and we shall + immediately see that pollen from a distinct plant is more effective than + that from the same flower. I need only add that, according to H. Muller, + the flowers do not secrete nectar, and he thinks that bees insert their + proboscides only in the hope of finding nectar; but they act in this + manner so frequently and for so long a time that I cannot avoid the belief + that they obtain something palatable within the flowers. + </p> + <p> + If the visits of bees are prevented, and if the flowers are not dashed by + the wind against any object, the keel never opens, so that the stamens and + pistil remain enclosed. Plants thus protected yield very few pods in + comparison with those produced by neighbouring uncovered bushes, and + sometimes none at all. I fertilised a few flowers on a plant growing + almost in a state of nature with pollen from another plant close + alongside, and the four crossed capsules contained on an average 9.2 + seeds. This large number no doubt was due to the bush being covered up, + and thus not exhausted by producing many pods; for fifty pods gathered + from an adjoining plant, the flowers of which had been fertilised by the + bees, contained an average of only 7.14 seeds. Ninety-three pods + spontaneously self-fertilised on a large bush which had been covered up, + but had been much agitated by the wind, contained an average of 2.93 + seeds. Ten of the finest of these ninety-three capsules yielded an average + of 4.30 seeds, that is less than half the average number in the four + artificially crossed capsules. The ratio of 7.14 to 2.93, or as 100 to 41, + is probably the fairest for the number of seeds per pod, yielded by + naturally-crossed and spontaneously self-fertilised flowers. The crossed + seeds compared with an equal number of the spontaneously self-fertilised + seeds were heavier, in the ratio of 100 to 88. We thus see that besides + the mechanical adaptations for cross-fertilisation, the flowers are much + more productive with pollen from a distinct plant than with their own + pollen. + </p> + <p> + Eight pairs of the above crossed and self-fertilised seeds, after they had + germinated on sand, were planted (1867) on the opposite sides of two large + pots. When several of the seedlings were an inch and a half in height, + there was no marked difference between the two lots. But even at this + early age the leaves of the self-fertilised seedlings were smaller and of + not so bright a green as those of the crossed seedlings. The pots were + kept in the greenhouse, and as the plants on the following spring (1868) + looked unhealthy and had grown but little, they were plunged, still in + their pots, into the open ground. The plants all suffered much from the + sudden change, especially the self-fertilised, and two of the latter died. + The remainder were measured, and I give the measurements in Table 5/58, + because I have not seen in any other species so great a difference between + the crossed and self-fertilised seedlings at so early an age. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/58. Sarothamnus scoparius (very young plants). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 4 4/8 : 2 4/8. Pot 1 : 6 : 1 4/8. Pot 1 : 2 : 1. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 2 : 1 4/8. Pot 2 : 2 4/8 : 1. Pot 2 : 0 4/8 : 0 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 17.5 : 8.0. + </p> + <p> + The six crossed plants here average 2.91, and the six self-fertilised 1.33 + inches in height; so that the former were more than twice as high as the + latter, or as 100 to 46. + </p> + <p> + In the spring of the succeeding year (1869) the three crossed plants in + Pot 1 had all grown to nearly a foot in height, and they had smothered the + three little self-fertilised plants so completely that two were dead; and + the third, only an inch and a half in height, was dying. It should be + remembered that these plants had been bedded out in their pots, so that + they were subjected to very severe competition. This pot was now thrown + away. + </p> + <p> + The six plants in Pot 2 were all alive. One of the self-fertilised was an + inch and a quarter taller than any one of the crossed plants; but the + other two self-fertilised plants were in a very poor condition. I + therefore resolved to leave these plants to struggle together for some + years. By the autumn of the same year (1869) the self-fertilised plant + which had been victorious was now beaten. The measurements are shown in + Table 5/59. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/59. Pot 2.—Sarothamnus scoparius. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + : 15 6/8 : 13 1/8. + : 9 6/8 : 3. + : 8 2/8 : 2 4/8. +</pre> + <p> + The same plants were again measured in the autumn of the following year, + 1870. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/60. Pot 2.—Sarothamnus scoparius. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + : 26 2/8 : 14 2/8. + : 16 4/8 : 11 4/8. + : 14 : 9 6/8. +</pre> + <p> + Total : 56.75 : 35.50. + </p> + <p> + The three crossed plants now averaged 18.91, and the three self-fertilised + 11.83 inches in height; or as 100 to 63. The three crossed plants in Pot + 1, as already shown, had beaten the three self-fertilised plants so + completely, that any comparison between them was superfluous. + </p> + <p> + The winter of 1870-1871 was severe. In the spring the three crossed plants + in Pot 2 had not even the tips of their shoots in the least injured, + whereas all three self-fertilised plants were killed half-way down to the + ground; and this shows how much more tender they were. In consequence not + one of these latter plants bore a single flower during the ensuing summer + of 1871, whilst all three crossed plants flowered. + </p> + <p> + Ononis minutissima. + </p> + <p> + This plant, of which seeds were sent me from North Italy, produces, + besides the ordinary papilionaceous flowers, minute, imperfect, closed or + cleistogene flowers, which can never be cross-fertilised, but are highly + self-fertile. Some of the perfect flowers were crossed with pollen from a + distinct plant, and six capsules thus produced yielded on an average 3.66 + seeds, with a maximum of five in one. Twelve perfect flowers were marked + and allowed to fertilise themselves spontaneously under a net, and they + yielded eight capsules, containing on an average 2.38 seeds, with a + maximum of three seeds in one. So that the crossed and self-fertilised + capsules from the perfect flowers yielded seeds in the proportion of 100 + to 65. Fifty-three capsules produced by the cleistogene flowers contained + on an average 4.1 seeds, so that these were the most productive of all; + and the seeds themselves looked finer even than those from the crossed + perfect flowers. + </p> + <p> + The seeds from the crossed perfect flowers and from the self-fertilised + cleistogene flowers were allowed to germinate on sand; but unfortunately + only two pairs germinated at the same time. These were planted on the + opposite sides of the same pot, which was kept in the greenhouse. In the + summer of the same year, when the seedlings were about 4 1/2 inches in + height, the two lots were equal. In the autumn of the following year + (1868) the two crossed plants were of exactly the same height, namely, 11 + 4/8 inches, and the two self-fertilised plants 12 6/8 and 7 2/8 inches; so + that one of the self-fertilised exceeded considerably in height all the + others. By the autumn of 1869 the two crossed plants had acquired the + supremacy; their height being 16 4/8 and 15 1/8, whilst that of the two + self-fertilised plants was 14 5/8 and 11 4/8 inches. + </p> + <p> + By the autumn of 1870, the heights were as follows:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/61. Ononis minutissima. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + : 20 3/8 : 17 4/8. + : 19 2/8 : 17 2/8. +</pre> + <p> + Total : 39.63 : 34.75. + </p> + <p> + So that the mean height of the two crossed plants was 19.81, and that of + the two self-fertilised 17.37 inches; or as 100 to 88. It should be + remembered that the two lots were at first equal in height; that one of + the self-fertilised plants then had the advantage, the two crossed plants + being at last victorious.] + </p> + <h3> + A SUMMARY ON THE LEGUMINOSAE. + </h3> + <p> + Six genera in this family were experimented on, and the results are in + some respects remarkable. The crossed plants of the two species of Lupinus + were conspicuously superior to the self-fertilised plants in height and + fertility; and when grown under very unfavourable conditions, in vigour. + The scarlet-runner (Phaseolus multiflorus) is partially sterile if the + visits of bees are prevented, and there is reason to believe that + varieties growing near one another intercross. The five crossed plants, + however, exceeded in height the five self-fertilised only by a little. + Phaseolus vulgaris is perfectly self-sterile; nevertheless, varieties + growing in the same garden sometimes intercross largely. The varieties of + Lathyrus odoratus, on the other hand, appear never to intercross in this + country; and though the flowers are not often visited by efficient + insects, I cannot account for this fact, more especially as the varieties + are believed to intercross in North Italy. Plants raised from a cross + between two varieties, differing only in the colour of their flowers, grew + much taller and were under unfavourable conditions more vigorous than the + self-fertilised plants; they also transmitted, when self-fertilised, their + superiority to their offspring. The many varieties of the common Pea + (Pisum sativum), though growing in close proximity, very seldom + intercross; and this seems due to the rarity in this country of the visits + of bees sufficiently powerful to effect cross-fertilisation. A cross + between the self-fertilised individuals of the same variety does no good + whatever to the offspring; whilst a cross between distinct varieties, + though closely allied, does great good, of which we have excellent + evidence. The flowers of the Broom (Sarothamnus) are almost sterile if + they are not disturbed and if insects are excluded. The pollen from a + distinct plant is more effective than that from the same flower in + producing seeds. The crossed seedlings have an enormous advantage over the + self-fertilised when grown together in close competition. Lastly, only + four plants of the Ononis minutissima were raised; but as these were + observed during their whole growth, the advantage of the crossed over the + self-fertilised plants may, I think, be fully trusted. + </p> + <p> + [15. ONAGRACEAE.—Clarkia elegans. + </p> + <p> + Owing to the season being very unfavourable (1867), few of the flowers + which I fertilised formed capsules; twelve crossed flowers produced only + four, and eighteen self-fertilised flowers yielded only one capsule. The + seeds after germinating on sand were planted in three pots, but all the + self-fertilised plants died in one of them. When the two lots were between + 4 and 5 inches in height, the crossed began to show a slight superiority + over the self-fertilised. When in full flower they were measured, with the + following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/62. Clarkia elegans. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 40 4/8 : 33. Pot 1 : 35 : 24. Pot 1 : 25 : 23. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 33 4/8 : 30 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 134.0 : 110.5. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the four crossed plants is 33.5, and that of the + four self-fertilised plants 27.62 inches, or as 100 to 82. The crossed + plants altogether produced 105 and the self-fertilised plants 63 capsules; + or as 100 to 60. In both pots a self-fertilised plant flowered before any + one of the crossed plants. + </p> + <p> + 16. LOASACEAE.—Bartonia aurea. + </p> + <p> + Some flowers were crossed and self-fertilised in the usual manner during + two seasons; but as I reared on the first occasion only two pairs, the + results are given together. On both occasions the crossed capsules + contained slightly more seeds than the self-fertilised. During the first + year, when the plants were about 7 inches in height, the self-fertilised + were the tallest, and in the second year the crossed were the tallest. + When the two lots were in full flower they were measured, as in Table + 5/63. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/63. Bartonia aurea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 31 : 37. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 18 4/8 : 20 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 19 4/8 : 40 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 25 : 35. Pot 4 : 36 : 15 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 31 : 18. Pot 5 : 16 : 11 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 20 : 32 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 197.0 : 210.5. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the eight crossed plants is 24.62, and that of the + eight self-fertilised 26.31 inches; or as 100 to 107. So that the + self-fertilised had a decided advantage over the crossed. But the plants + from some cause never grew well, and finally became so unhealthy that only + three crossed and three self-fertilised plants survived to set any + capsules, and these were few in number. The two lots seemed to be about + equally unproductive. + </p> + <p> + 17. PASSIFLORACEAE.—Passiflora gracilis. + </p> + <p> + This annual species produces spontaneously numerous fruits when insects + are excluded, and behaves in this respect very differently from most of + the other species in the genus, which are extremely sterile unless + fertilised with pollen from a distinct plant. (5/17. ‘Variation of Animals + and Plants under Domestication’ chapter 17 2nd edition volume 2 page 118.) + Fourteen fruits from crossed flowers contained on an average 24.14 seeds. + Fourteen fruits (two poor ones being rejected), spontaneously + self-fertilised under a net, contained on an average 20.58 seeds per + fruit; or as 100 to 85. These seeds were sown on the opposite sides of + three pots, but only two pairs came up at the same time; and therefore a + fair judgment cannot be formed. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/64. Passiflora gracilis. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 56 : 38. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 42 : 64. + </p> + <p> + Total : 98 : 102. + </p> + <p> + The mean of the two crossed is 49 inches, and that of the two + self-fertilised 51 inches; or as 100 to 104. + </p> + <p> + 18. UMBELLIFERAE.—Apium petroselinum. + </p> + <p> + The Umbelliferae are proterandrous, and can hardly fail to be + cross-fertilised by the many flies and small Hymenoptera which visit the + flowers. (5/18. Hermann Muller ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 96. According to M. + Mustel as stated by Godron ‘De l’espèce’ tome 2 page 58 1859, varieties of + the carrot growing near each other readily intercross.) A plant of the + common parsley was covered by a net, and it apparently produced as many + and as fine spontaneously self-fertilised fruits or seeds as the adjoining + uncovered plants. The flowers on the latter were visited by so many + insects that they must have received pollen from one another. Some of + these two lots of seeds were left on sand, but nearly all the + self-fertilised seeds germinated before the others, so that I was forced + to throw all away. The remaining seeds were then sown on the opposite + sides of four pots. At first the self-fertilised seedlings were a little + taller in most of the pots than the naturally crossed seedlings, and this + no doubt was due to the self-fertilised seeds having germinated first. But + in the autumn all the plants were so equal that it did not seem worth + while to measure them. In two of the pots they were absolutely equal; in a + third, if there was any difference, it was in favour of the crossed + plants, and in a somewhat plainer manner in the fourth pot. But neither + side had any substantial advantage over the other; so that in height they + may be said to be as 100 to 100. + </p> + <p> + 19. DIPSACEAE.—Scabiosa atro-purpurea. + </p> + <p> + The flowers, which are proterandrous, were fertilised during the + unfavourable season of 1867, so that I got few seeds, especially from the + self-fertilised heads, which were extremely sterile. The crossed and + self-fertilised plants raised from these seeds were measured before they + were in full flower, as in Table 5/65. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/65. Scabiosa atro-purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 14 : 20. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 15 : 14 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 21 : 14. Pot 3 : 18 4/8 : 13. + </p> + <p> + Total : 68.5 : 61.5. + </p> + <p> + The four crossed plants averaged 17.12, and the four self-fertilised 15.37 + inches in height; or as 100 to 90. One of the self-fertilised plants in + Pot 3 was killed by an accident, and its fellow pulled up; so that when + they were again measured to the summits of their flowers, there were only + three on each side; the crossed now averaged in height 32.83, and the + self-fertilised 30.16 inches; or as 100 to 92. + </p> + <p> + 20. COMPOSITAE.—Lactuca sativa. (5/19. The Compositae are + well-adapted for cross-fertilisation, but a nurseryman on whom I can rely, + told me that he had been in the habit of sowing several kinds of lettuce + near together for the sake of seed, and had never observed that they + became crossed. It is very improbable that all the varieties which were + thus cultivated near together flowered at different times; but two which I + selected by hazard and sowed near each other did not flower at the same + time; and my trial failed.) + </p> + <p> + Three plants of Lettuce (Great London Cos var.) grew close together in my + garden; one was covered by a net, and produced self-fertilised seeds, the + other two were allowed to be naturally crossed by insects; but the season + (1867) was unfavourable, and I did not obtain many seeds. Only one crossed + and one self-fertilised plant were raised in Pot 1, and their measurements + are given in Table 5/66. The flowers on this one self-fertilised plant + were again self-fertilised under a net, not with pollen from the same + floret, but from other florets on the same head. The flowers on the two + crossed plants were left to be crossed by insects, but the process was + aided by some pollen being occasionally transported by me from plant to + plant. These two lots of seeds, after germinating on sand, were planted in + pairs on the opposite sides of Pots 2 and 3, which were at first kept in + the greenhouse and then turned out of doors. The plants were measured when + in full flower. Table 5/66, therefore, includes plants belonging to two + generations. When the seedlings of the two lots were only 5 or 6 inches in + height they were equal. In Pot 3 one of the self-fertilised plants died + before flowering, as has occurred in so many other cases. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/66. Lactuca sativa. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 27 : 21 4/8. Pot 1 : 25 : 20. First generation, planted in open + ground. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 29 4/8 : 24. Pot 2 : 17 4/8 : 10. Pot 2 : 12 4/8 : 11. Second + generation, planted in open ground. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 14 : 9 4/8. Pot 3 : 10 4/8 : 0. Second generation, kept in the + pot. + </p> + <p> + Total : 136 : 96. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the seven crossed plants is 19.43, and that of the + six self-fertilised plants 16 inches; or as 100 to 82. + </p> + <p> + 21. CAMPANULACEAE.—Specularia speculum. + </p> + <p> + In the closely allied genus, Campanula, in which Specularia was formerly + included, the anthers shed at an early period their pollen, and this + adheres to the collecting hairs which surround the pistil beneath the + stigma; so that without some mechanical aid the flowers cannot be + fertilised. For instance, I covered up a plant of Campanula carpathica, + and it did not produce a single capsule, whilst the surrounding uncovered + plants seeded profusely. On the other hand, the present species of + Specularia appears to set almost as many capsules when covered up, as when + left to the visits of the Diptera, which, as far as I have seen, are the + only insects that frequent the flowers. (5/20. It has long been known that + another species of the genus, Specularia perfoliata, produces cleistogene + as well as perfect flowers, and the former are of course self-fertile.) I + did not ascertain whether the naturally crossed and spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules contained an equal number of seeds, but a + comparison of artificially crossed and self-fertilised flowers, showed + that the former were probably the most productive. It appears that this + plant is capable of producing a large number of self-fertilised capsules + owing to the petals closing at night, as well as during cold weather. In + the act of closing, the margins of the petals become reflexed, and their + inwardly projecting midribs then pass between the clefts of the stigma, + and in doing so push the pollen from the outside of the pistil on to the + stigmatic surfaces. (5/21. Mr. Meehan has lately shown ‘Proceedings of the + Academy of Natural Science Philadelphia’ May 16, 1876 page 84, that the + closing of the flowers of Claytonia virginica and Ranunculus bulbosus + during the night causes their self-fertilisation.) + </p> + <p> + Twenty flowers were fertilised by me with their own pollen, but owing to + the bad season, only six capsules were produced; they contained on an + average 21.7 seeds, with a maximum of forty-eight in one. Fourteen flowers + were crossed with pollen from another plant, and these produced twelve + capsules, containing on an average 30 seeds, with a maximum in one of + fifty-seven seeds; so that the crossed seeds were to the self-fertilised + from an equal number of capsules as 100 to 72. The former were also + heavier than an equal number of self-fertilised seeds, in the ratio of 100 + to 86. Thus, whether we judge by the number of capsules produced from an + equal number of flowers, or by the average number of the contained seeds, + or the maximum number in any one capsule, or by their weight, crossing + does great good in comparison with self-fertilisation. The two lots of + seeds were sown on the opposite sides of four pots; but the seedlings were + not sufficiently thinned. Only the tallest plant on each side was + measured, when fully grown. The measurements are given in Table 5/67. In + all four pots the crossed plants flowered first. When the seedlings were + only about an inch and a half in height both lots were equal. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/67. Specularia speculum. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Tallest Crossed Plant in each Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Tallest Self-fertilised Plant in each Pot. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 18 : 15 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 17 : 19. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 22 1/8 : 18. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 20 : 23. + </p> + <p> + Total : 77.13 : 75.75. + </p> + <p> + The four tallest crossed plants averaged 19.28, and the four tallest + self-fertilised 18.93 inches in height; or as 100 to 98. So that there was + no difference worth speaking of between the two lots in height; though + other great advantages are derived, as we have seen, from + cross-fertilisation. From being grown in pots and kept in the greenhouse, + none of the plants produced any capsules. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia ramosa. (5/22. I have adopted the name given to this plant in the + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1866. Professor T. Dyer, however, informs me that + it probably is a white variety of L. tenuior of R. Brown, from W. + Australia.) + </p> + <h3> + VAR. SNOW-FLAKE. + </h3> + <p> + The well-adapted means by which cross-fertilisation is ensured in this + genus have been described by several authors. (5/23. See the works of + Hildebrand and Delpino. Mr. Farrer also has given a remarkably clear + description of the mechanism by which cross-fertilisation is effected in + this genus, in the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ volume 2 4th + series 1868 page 260. In the allied genus Isotoma, the curious spike which + projects rectangularly from the anthers, and which when shaken causes the + pollen to fall on the back of an entering insect, seems to have been + developed from a bristle, like one of those which spring from the anthers + in some of or all the species of Lobelia, as described by Mr. Farrer.) The + pistil as it slowly increases in length pushes the pollen out of the + conjoined anthers, by the aid of a ring of bristles; the two lobes of the + stigma being at this time closed and incapable of fertilisation. The + extrusion of the pollen is also aided by insects, which rub against the + little bristles that project from the anthers. The pollen thus pushed out + is carried by insects to the older flowers, in which the stigma of the now + freely projecting pistil is open and ready to be fertilised. I proved the + importance of the gaily-coloured corolla, by cutting off the large flowers + of Lobelia erinus; and these flowers were neglected by the hive-bees which + were incessantly visiting the other flowers. + </p> + <p> + A capsule was obtained by crossing a flower of L. ramosa with pollen from + another plant, and two other capsules from artificially self-fertilised + flowers. The contained seeds were sown on the opposite sides of four pots. + Some of the crossed seedlings which came up before the others had to be + pulled up and thrown away. Whilst the plants were very small there was not + much difference in height between the two lots; but in Pot 3 the + self-fertilised were for a time the tallest. When in full flower the + tallest plant on each side of each pot was measured, and the result is + shown in Table 5/68. In all four pots a crossed plant flowered before any + one of its opponents. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/68. Lobelia ramosa (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Tallest Crossed Plant in each Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Tallest Self-fertilised Plant in each Pot. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 22 4/8 : 17 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 27 4/8 : 24. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 16 4/8 : 15. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 22 4/8 : 17. + </p> + <p> + Total : 89.0 : 73.5. + </p> + <p> + The four tallest crossed plants averaged 22.25, and the four tallest + self-fertilised 18.37 inches in height; or as 100 to 82. I was surprised + to find that the anthers of a good many of these self-fertilised plants + did not cohere and did not contain any pollen; and the anthers even of a + very few of the crossed plants were in the same condition. Some flowers on + the crossed plants were again crossed, four capsules being thus obtained; + and some flowers on the self-fertilised plants were again self-fertilised, + seven capsules being thus obtained. The seeds from both lots were weighed, + and it was calculated that an equal number of capsules would have yielded + seed in the proportion by weight of 100 for the crossed to 60 for the + self-fertilised capsules. So that the flowers on the crossed plants again + crossed were much more fertile than those on the self-fertilised plants + again self-fertilised. + </p> + <h3> + PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + The above two lots of seeds were placed on damp sand, and many of the + crossed seeds germinated, as on the last occasion, before the + self-fertilised, and were rejected. Three or four pairs in the same state + of germination were planted on the opposite sides of two pots; a single + pair in a third pot; and all the remaining seeds were sown crowded in a + fourth pot. When the seedlings were about one and a half inches in height, + they were equal on both sides of the three first pots; but in Pot 4, in + which they grew crowded and were thus exposed to severe competition, the + crossed were about a third taller than the self-fertilised. In this latter + pot, when the crossed averaged 5 inches in height, the self-fertilised + were about 4 inches; nor did they look nearly such fine plants. In all + four pots the crossed plants flowered some days before the + self-fertilised. When in full flower the tallest plant on each side was + measured; but before this time the single crossed plant in Pot 3, which + was taller than its antagonist, had died and was not measured. So that + only the tallest plant on each side of three pots was measured, as in + Table 5/69. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/69. Lobelia ramosa (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Tallest Crossed Plant in each Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Tallest Self-fertilised Plant in each Pot. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 27 4/8 : 18 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 21 : 19 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 21 4/8 : 19. Crowded. + </p> + <p> + Total : 70 : 57. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the three tallest crossed plants is here 23.33, and + that of the tallest self-fertilised 19 inches; or as 100 to 81. Besides + this difference in height, the crossed plants were much more vigorous and + more branched than the self-fertilised plants, and it is unfortunate that + they were not weighed. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia fulgens. + </p> + <p> + This species offers a somewhat perplexing case. In the first generation + the self-fertilised plants, though few in number, greatly exceeded the + crossed in height; whilst in the second generation, when the trial was + made on a much larger scale, the crossed beat the self-fertilised plants. + As this species is generally propagated by off-sets, some seedlings were + first raised, in order to have distinct plants. On one of these plants + several flowers were fertilised with their own pollen; and as the pollen + is mature and shed long before the stigma of the same flower is ready for + fertilisation, it was necessary to number each flower and keep its pollen + in paper with a corresponding number. By this means well-matured pollen + was used for self-fertilisation. Several flowers on the same plant were + crossed with pollen from a distinct individual, and to obtain this the + conjoined anthers of young flowers were roughly squeezed, and as it is + naturally protruded very slowly by the growth of the pistil, it is + probable that the pollen used by me was hardly mature, certainly less + mature than that employed for self-fertilisation. I did not at the time + think of this source of error, but I now suspect that the growth of the + crossed plants was thus injured. Anyhow the trial was not perfectly fair. + Opposed to the belief that the pollen used in crossing was not in so good + a state as that used for self-fertilisation, is the fact that a greater + proportional number of the crossed than of the self-fertilised flowers + produced capsules; but there was no marked difference in the amount of + seed contained in the capsules of the two lots. (5/24. Gartner has shown + that certain plants of Lobelia fulgens are quite sterile with pollen from + the same plant, though this pollen is efficient on any other individual; + but none of the plants on which I experimented, which were kept in the + greenhouse, were in this peculiar condition.) + </p> + <p> + As the seeds obtained by the above two methods would not germinate when + left on bare sand, they were sown on the opposite sides of four pots; but + I succeeded in raising only a single pair of seedlings of the same age in + each pot. The self-fertilised seedlings, when only a few inches in height, + were in most of the pots taller than their opponents; and they flowered so + much earlier in all the pots, that the height of the flower-stems could be + fairly compared only in Pots 1 and 2. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/70. Lobelia fulgens (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of flower-stems measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Height of Flower-stems on the Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Height of Flower-stems on the Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 33 : 50. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 36 4/8 : 38 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 21* : 43. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 12* : 35 6/8. + </p> + <p> + *Not in full flower. + </p> + <p> + The mean height of the flower-stems of the two crossed plants in Pots 1 + and 2 is here 34.75 inches, and that of the two self-fertilised plants in + the same pots 44.25 inches; or as 100 to 127. The self-fertilised plants + in Pots 3 and 4 were in every respect very much finer than the crossed + plants. + </p> + <p> + I was so much surprised at this great superiority of the self-fertilised + over the crossed plants, that I determined to try how they would behave in + one of the pots during a second growth. The two plants, therefore, in Pot + 1 were cut down, and repotted without being disturbed in a much larger + pot. In the following year the self-fertilised plant showed even a greater + superiority than before; for the two tallest flower-stems produced by the + one crossed plant were only 29 4/8 and 30 1/8 inches in height, whereas + the two tallest stems on the one self-fertilised plant were 49 4/8 and 49 + 6/8 inches; and this gives a ratio of 100 to 167. Considering all the + evidence, there can be no doubt that these self-fertilised plants had a + great superiority over the crossed plants. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + TABLE 5/71. Lobelia fulgens (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of flower-stems measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 27 3/8 : 32 3/8. Pot 1 : 26 : 26 3/8. Pot 1 : 24 3/8 : 25 1/8. Pot + 1 : 24 4/8 : 26 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 34 : 36 2/8. Pot 2 : 26 6/8 : 28 6/8. Pot 2 : 25 1/8 : 30 1/8. Pot + 2 : 26 : 32 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 40 4/8 : 30 4/8. Pot 3 : 37 5/8 : 28 2/8. Pot 3 : 32 1/8 : 23. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 34 5/8 : 29 4/8. Pot 4 : 32 2/8 : 28 3/8. Pot 4 : 29 3/8 : 26. Pot + 4 : 27 1/8 : 25 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 28 1/8 : 29. Pot 5 : 27 : 24 6/8. Pot 5 : 25 3/8 : 23 2/8. Pot 5 : + 24 3/8 : 24. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 33 5/8 : 44 2/8. Pot 6 : 32 : 37 6/8. Pot 6 : 26 1/8 : 37. Pot 6 : + 25 : 35. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 30 6/8 : 27 2/8. Pot 7 : 30 3/8 : 19 2/8. Pot 7 : 29 2/8 : 21. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 39 3/8 : 23 1/8. Pot 8 : 37 2/8 : 23 4/8. Pot 8 : 36 : 25 4/8. Pot + 8 : 36 : 25 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 9 : 33 3/8 : 19 3/8. Pot 9 : 25 : 16 3/8. Pot 9 : 25 3/8 : 19. Pot 9 : + 21 7/8 : 18 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 1014.00 : 921.63. + </p> + <p> + I determined on this occasion to avoid the error of using pollen of not + quite equal maturity for crossing and self-fertilisation; so that I + squeezed pollen out of the conjoined anthers of young flowers for both + operations. Several flowers on the crossed plant in Pot 1 in Table 5/70 + were again crossed with pollen from a distinct plant. Several other + flowers on the self-fertilised plant in the same pot were again + self-fertilised with pollen from the anthers of other flowers on the SAME + PLANT. Therefore the degree of self-fertilisation was not quite so close + as in the last generation, in which pollen from the SAME FLOWER, kept in + paper, was used. These two lots of seeds were thinly sown on opposite + sides of nine pots; and the young seedlings were thinned, an equal number + of nearly as possible the same age being left on the two sides. In the + spring of the following year (1870), when the seedlings had grown to a + considerable size, they were measured to the tips of their leaves; and the + twenty-three crossed plants averaged 14.04 inches in height, whilst the + twenty-three self-fertilised seedlings were 13.54 inches; or as 100 to 96. + </p> + <p> + In the summer of the same year several of these plants flowered, the + crossed and self-fertilised plants flowering almost simultaneously, and + all the flower-stems were measured. Those produced by eleven of the + crossed plants averaged 30.71 inches, and those by nine of the + self-fertilised plants 29.43 inches in height; or as 100 to 96. + </p> + <p> + The plants in these nine pots, after they had flowered, were repotted + without being disturbed in much larger pots; and in the following year, + 1871, all flowered freely; but they had grown into such an entangled mass, + that the separate plants on each side could no longer be distinguished. + Accordingly three or four of the tallest flower-stems on each side of each + pot were measured; and the measurements in Table 5/71 are, I think, more + trustworthy than the previous ones, from being more numerous, and from the + plants being well established and growing vigorously. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the thirty-four tallest flower-stems on the + twenty-three crossed plants is 29.82 inches, and that of the same number + of flower-stems on the same number of self-fertilised plants is 27.10 + inches, or as 100 to 91. So that the crossed plants now showed a decided + advantage over their self-fertilised opponents. + </p> + <p> + 22. POLEMONIACEAE.—Nemophila insignis. + </p> + <p> + Twelve flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant, but + produced only six capsules, containing on an average 18.3 seeds. Eighteen + flowers were fertilised with their own pollen and produced ten capsules, + containing on an average 12.7 seeds, so that the seeds per capsule were as + 100 to 69. (5/25. Several species of Polemoniaceae are known to be + proterandrous, but I did not attend to this point in Nemophila. Verlot + says ‘Des Variétés’ 1865 page 66, that varieties growing near one another + spontaneously intercross.) The crossed seeds weighed a little less than an + equal number of self-fertilised seeds, in the proportion of 100 to 105; + but this was clearly due to some of the self-fertilised capsules + containing very few seeds, and these were much bulkier than the others, + from having been better nourished. A subsequent comparison of the number + of seeds in a few capsules did not show so great a superiority on the side + of the crossed capsules as in the present case. + </p> + <p> + The seeds were placed on sand, and after germinating were planted in pairs + on the opposite sides of five pots, which were kept in the greenhouse. + When the seedlings were from 2 to 3 inches in height, most of the crossed + had a slight advantage over the self-fertilised. The plants were trained + up sticks, and thus grew to a considerable height. In four out of the five + pots a crossed plant flowered before any one of the self-fertilised. The + plants were first measured to the tips of their leaves, before they had + flowered and when the crossed were under a foot in height. The twelve + crossed plants averaged 11.1 inches in height, whilst the twelve + self-fertilised were less than half of this height, namely, 5.45; or as + 100 to 49. Before the plants had grown to their full height, two of the + self-fertilised died, and as I feared that this might happen with others, + they were again measured to the tops of their stems, as shown in Table + 5/72. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/72. Nemophila insignis; 0 means that the plant died. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 32 4/8 : 21 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 34 4/8 : 23 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 33 1/8 : 19. Pot 3 : 22 2/8 : 7 2/8. Pot 3 : 29 : 17 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 35 4/8 : 10 4/8. Pot 4 : 33 4/8 : 27. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 35 : 0. Pot 5 : 38 : 18 3/8. Pot 5 : 36 : 20 4/8. Pot 5 : 37 4/8 : + 34. Pot 5 : 32 4/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Total : 399.38 : 199.00. + </p> + <p> + The twelve crossed plants now averaged 33.28, and the ten self-fertilised + 19.9 inches in height, or as 100 to 60; so that they differed somewhat + less than before. + </p> + <p> + The plants in Pots 3 and 5 were placed under a net in the greenhouse, two + of the crossed plants in the latter pot being pulled up on account of the + death of two of the self-fertilised; so that altogether six crossed and + six self-fertilised plants were left to fertilise themselves + spontaneously. The pots were rather small, and the plants did not produce + many capsules. The small size of the self-fertilised plants will largely + account for the fewness of the capsules which they produced. The six + crossed plants bore 105, and the six self-fertilised only 30 capsules; or + as 100 to 29. + </p> + <p> + The self-fertilised seeds thus obtained from the crossed and + self-fertilised plants, after germinating on sand, were planted on the + opposite sides of four small pots, and treated as before. But many of the + plants were unhealthy, and their heights were so unequal—some on + both sides being five times as tall as the others—that the averages + deduced from the measurements in Table 5/73 are not in the least + trustworthy. Nevertheless I have felt bound to give them, as they are + opposed to my general conclusions. + </p> + <p> + The seven self-fertilised plants from the crossed plants here average + 15.73, and the seven self-fertilised from the self-fertilised 21 inches in + height; or as 100 to 133. Strictly analogous experiments with Viola + tricolor and Lathyrus odoratus gave a very different result. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/73. Nemophila insignis. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants from Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants from Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 27 : 27 4/8. Pot 1 : 14 : 34 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 17 6/8 : 23. Pot 2 : 24 4/8 : 32. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 16 : 7. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 5 3/8 : 7 2/8. Pot 4 : 5 4/8 : 16. + </p> + <p> + Total : 110.13 : 147.00. + </p> + <p> + 23. BORAGINACEAE.—Borago officinalis. + </p> + <p> + This plant is frequented by a greater number of bees than any other one + which I have observed. It is strongly proterandrous (H. Muller + ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 267), and the flowers can hardly fail to be + cross-fertilised; but should this not occur, they are capable of + self-fertilisation to a limited extent, as some pollen long remains within + the anthers, and is apt to fall on the mature stigma. In the year 1863 I + covered up a plant, and examined thirty-five flowers, of which only twelve + yielded any seeds; whereas of thirty-five flowers on an exposed plant + growing close by, all with the exception of two yielded seeds. The + covered-up plant, however, produced altogether twenty-five spontaneously + self-fertilised seeds; the exposed plant producing fifty-five seeds, the + product, no doubt, of cross-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + In the year 1868 eighteen flowers on a protected plant were crossed with + pollen from a distinct plant, but only seven of these produced fruit; and + I suspect that I applied pollen to many of the stigmas before they were + mature. These fruits contained on an average 2 seeds, with a maximum in + one of three seeds. Twenty-four spontaneously self-fertilised fruits were + produced by the same plant, and these contained on an average 1.2 seeds, + with a maximum of two in one fruit. So that the fruits from the + artificially crossed flowers yielded seeds compared with those from the + spontaneously self-fertilised flowers, in the ratio of 100 to 60. But the + self-fertilised seeds, as often occurs when few are produced, were heavier + than the crossed seeds in the ratio of 100 to 90. + </p> + <p> + These two lots of seeds were sown on opposite sides of two large pots; but + I succeeded in raising only four pairs of equal age. When the seedlings on + both sides were about 8 inches in height they were equal. When in full + flower they were measured, as follows:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/74. Borago officinalis. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 19 : 13 4/8. Pot 1 : 21 : 18 6/8. Pot 1 : 16 4/8 : 20 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 26 2/8 : 32 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 82.75 : 84.75. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the four crossed plants is here 20.68, and that of + the four self-fertilised 21.18 inches; or as 100 to 102. The + self-fertilised plants thus exceeded the crossed in height by a little; + but this was entirely due to the tallness of one of the self-fertilised. + The crossed plants in both pots flowered before the self-fertilised. + Therefore I believe if more plants had been raised, the result would have + been different. I regret that I did not attend to the fertility of the two + lots. + </p> + <p> + 24. NOLANACEAE.—Nolana prostrata. + </p> + <p> + In some of the flowers the stamens are considerably shorter than the + pistil, in others equal to it in length. I suspected, therefore, but + erroneously as it proved, that this plant was dimorphic, like Primula, + Linum, etc., and in the year 1862 twelve plants, covered by a net in the + greenhouse, were subjected to trial. The spontaneously self-fertilised + flowers yielded 64 grains weight of seeds, but the product of fourteen + artificially crossed flowers is here included, which falsely increases the + weight of the self-fertilised seeds. Nine uncovered plants, the flowers of + which were eagerly visited by bees for their pollen and were no doubt + intercrossed by them, produced 79 grains weight of seeds: therefore twelve + plants thus treated would have yielded 105 grains. Thus the seeds produced + by the flowers on an equal number of plants, when crossed by bees, and + spontaneously self-fertilised (the product of fourteen artificially + crossed flowers being, however, included in the latter) were in weight as + 100 to 61. + </p> + <p> + In the summer of 1867 the trial was repeated; thirty flowers were crossed + with pollen from a distinct plant and produced twenty-seven capsules, each + containing five seeds. Thirty-two flowers were fertilised with their own + pollen, and produced only six capsules, each with five seeds. So that the + crossed and self-fertilised capsules contained the same number of seeds, + though many more capsules were produced by the cross-fertilised than by + the self-fertilised flowers, in the ratio of 100 to 21. + </p> + <p> + An equal number of seeds of both lots were weighed, and the crossed seeds + were to the self-fertilised in weight as 100 to 82. Therefore a cross + increases the number of capsules produced and the weight of the seeds, but + not the number of seeds in each capsule. + </p> + <p> + These two lots of seeds, after germinating on sand, were planted on the + opposite sides of three pots. The seedlings when from 6 to 7 inches in + height were equal. The plants were measured when fully grown, but their + heights were so unequal in the several pots, that the result cannot be + fully trusted. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 5/75. Nolana prostrata. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 8 4/8 : 4 2/8. Pot 1 : 6 4/8 : 7 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 10 4/8 : 14 4/8. Pot 2 : 18 : 18. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 20 2/8 : 22 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 63.75 : 67.00. + </p> + <p> + The five crossed plants average 12.75, and the five self-fertilised 13.4 + inches in height; or as 100 to 105. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0006" id="link2HCH0006"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER VI. SOLANACEAE, PRIMULACEAE, POLYGONEAE, ETC. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Petunia violacea, crossed and self-fertilised plants compared for four + generations. + Effects of a cross with a fresh stock. + Uniform colour of the flowers on the self-fertilised plants of the + fourth generation. + Nicotiana tabacum, crossed and self-fertilised plants of equal height. + Great effects of a cross with a distinct sub-variety on the height, but + not on the fertility, of the offspring. + Cyclamen persicum, crossed seedlings greatly superior to the self-fertilised. + Anagallis collina. + Primula veris. + Equal-styled variety of Primula veris, fertility of, greatly increased + by a cross with a fresh stock. + Fagopyrum esculentum. + Beta vulgaris. + Canna warscewiczi, crossed and self-fertilised plants of equal height. + Zea mays. + Phalaris canariensis. +</pre> + <p> + 25. SOLANACEAE. Petunia violacea. + </p> + <h3> + DINGY PURPLE VARIETY. + </h3> + <p> + The flowers of this plant are so seldom visited during the day by insects + in this country, that I have never seen an instance; but my gardener, on + whom I can rely, once saw some humble-bees at work. Mr. Meehan says, that + in the United States bees bore through the corolla for the nectar, and + adds that their “fertilisation is carried on by night-moths.” (6/1. + ‘Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia’ August 2, + 1870 page 90.) + </p> + <p> + In France M. Naudin, after castrating a large number of flowers whilst in + bud, left them exposed to the visits of insects, and about a quarter + produced capsules (6/2. ‘Annales des Sc. Nat.’ 4th series Bot. Tome 9 cah. + 5); but I am convinced that a much larger proportion of flowers in my + garden are cross-fertilised by insects, for protected flowers with their + own pollen placed on the stigma never yielded nearly a full complement of + seed; whilst those left uncovered produced fine capsules, showing that + pollen from other plants must have been brought to them, probably by + moths. Plants growing vigorously and flowering in pots in the greenhouse, + never yielded a single capsule; and this may be attributed, at least in + chief part, to the exclusion of moths. + </p> + <p> + Six flowers on a plant covered by a net were crossed with pollen from a + distinct plant and produced six capsules, containing by weight 4.44 grains + of seed. Six other flowers were fertilised with their own pollen and + produced only three capsules, containing only 1.49 grains weight of seed. + From this it follows that an equal number of crossed and self-fertilised + capsules would have contained seeds by weight as 100 to 67. I should not + have thought the proportional contents of so few capsules worth giving, + had not nearly the same result been confirmed by several subsequent + trials. + </p> + <p> + Seeds of the two lots were placed on sand, and many of the self-fertilised + seeds germinated before the crossed, and were rejected. Several pairs in + an equal state of germination were planted on the opposite sides of Pots 1 + and 2; but only the tallest plant on each side was measured. Seeds were + also sown thickly on the two sides of a large pot (3), the seedlings being + afterwards thinned, so that an equal number was left on each side; the + three tallest on each side being measured. The pots were kept in the + greenhouse, and the plants were trained up sticks. For some time the young + crossed plants had no advantage in height over the self-fertilised; but + their leaves were larger. When fully grown and in flower the plants were + measured, as follows:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/76. Petunia violacea (first generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 30 : 20 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 34 4/8 : 27 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 34 : 28 4/8. Pot 3 : 30 4/8 : 27 4/8. Pot 3 : 25 : 26. + </p> + <p> + Total : 154 : 130. + </p> + <p> + The five tallest crossed plants here average 30.8, and the five tallest + self-fertilised 26 inches in height, or as 100 to 84. + </p> + <p> + Three capsules were obtained by crossing flowers on the above crossed + plants, and three other capsules by again self-fertilising flowers on the + self-fertilised plants. One of the latter capsules appeared as fine as any + one of the crossed capsules; but the other two contained many imperfect + seeds. From these two lots of seeds the plants of the following generation + were raised. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + As in the last generation, many of the self-fertilised seeds germinated + before the crossed. + </p> + <p> + Seeds in an equal state of germination were planted on the opposite sides + of three pots. The crossed seedlings soon greatly exceeded in height the + self-fertilised. In Pot 1, when the tallest crossed plant was 10 1/2 + inches high, the tallest self-fertilised was only 3 1/2 inches; in Pot 2 + the excess in height of the crossed was not quite so great. The plants + were treated as in the last generation, and when fully grown measured as + before. In Pot 3 both the crossed plants were killed at an early age by + some animal, so that the self-fertilised had no competitors. Nevertheless + these two self-fertilised plants were measured, and are included in Table + 6/77. The crossed plants flowered long before their self-fertilised + opponents in Pots 1 and 2, and before those growing separately in Pot 3. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/77. Petunia violacea (Second generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 57 2/8 : 13 4/8. Pot 1 : 36 2/8 : 8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 44 4/8 : 33 2/8. Pot 2 : 24 : 28. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 0 : 46 2/8. Pot 3 : 0 : 28 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 162.0 : 157.5. + </p> + <p> + The four crossed plants average 40.5, and the six self-fertilised 26.25 + inches in height; or as 100 to 65. But this great inequality is in part + accidental, owing to some of the self-fertilised plants being very short, + and to one of the crossed being very tall. + </p> + <p> + Twelve flowers on these crossed plants were again crossed, and eleven + capsules were produced; of these, five were poor and six good; the latter + contained by weight 3.75 grains of seeds. Twelve flowers on the + self-fertilised plants were again fertilised with their own pollen and + produced no less than twelve capsules, and the six finest of these + contained by weight 2.57 grains of seeds. It should however be observed + that these latter capsules were produced by the plants in Pot 3, which + were not exposed to any competition. The seeds in the six fine crossed + capsules to those in the six finest self-fertilised capsules were in + weight as 100 to 68. From these seeds the plants of the next generation + were raised. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE THIRD GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + TABLE 6/78. Petunia violacea (third generation; plants very young). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 1 4/8 : 5 6/8. Pot 1 : 1 : 4 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 5 7/8 : 8 3/8. Pot 2 : 5 6/8 : 6 7/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 4 : 5 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 1 4/8 : 5 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 19.63 : 36.50. + </p> + <p> + The above seeds were placed on sand, and after germinating were planted in + pairs on the opposite sides of four pots; and all the remaining seeds were + thickly sown on the two sides of a fifth large pot. The result was + surprising, for the self-fertilised seedlings very early in life beat the + crossed, and at one time were nearly double their height. At first the + case appeared like that of Mimulus, in which after the third generation a + tall and highly self-fertile variety appeared. But as in the two + succeeding generations the crossed plants resumed their former superiority + over the self-fertilised, the case must be looked at as an anomaly. The + sole conjecture which I can form is that the crossed seeds had not been + sufficiently ripened, and thus produced weakly plants, as occurred with + Iberis. When the crossed plants were between 3 and 4 inches in height, the + six finest in four of the pots were measured to the summits of their + stems, and at the same time the six finest of the self-fertilised plants. + The measurements are given in Table 6/78, and it may be here seen that all + the self-fertilised plants exceed their opponents in height, whereas when + subsequently measured the excess of the self-fertilised depended chiefly + on the unusual tallness of two of the plants in Pot 2. The crossed plants + here average 3.27, and the self-fertilised 6.08 inches in height; or as + 100 to 186. + </p> + <p> + When fully grown they were again measured, as follows:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/79. Petunia violacea (third generation; plants fully grown). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 41 4/8 : 40 6/8. Pot 1 : 48 : 39. Pot 1 : 36 : 48. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 36 : 47. Pot 2 : 21 : 80 2/8. Pot 2 : 36 2/8 : 86 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 52 : 46. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 57 : 43 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 327.75 : 431.00. + </p> + <p> + The eight crossed plants now averaged 40.96, and the eight self-fertilised + plants 53.87 inches in height, or as 100 to 131; and this excess chiefly + depended, as already stated, on the unusual tallness of two of the + self-fertilised plants in Pot 2. The self-fertilised had therefore lost + some of their former great superiority over the crossed plants. In three + of the pots the self-fertilised plants flowered first; but in Pot 3 at the + same time with the crossed. + </p> + <p> + The case is rendered the more strange, because the crossed plants in the + fifth pot (not included in the two last tables), in which all the + remaining seeds had been thickly sown, were from the first finer plants + than the self-fertilised, and had larger leaves. At the period when the + two tallest crossed plants in this pot were 6 4/8 and 4 5/8 inches high, + the two tallest self-fertilised were only 4 inches. When the two crossed + plants were 12 and 10 inches high, the two self-fertilised were only 8 + inches. These latter plants, as well as many others on the same side of + this pot never grew any higher, whereas several of the crossed plants grew + to the height of two feet! On account of this great superiority of the + crossed plants, the plants on neither side of this pot have been included + in the two last tables. + </p> + <p> + Thirty flowers on the crossed plants in Pots 1 and 4 (Table 6/79) were + again crossed, and produced seventeen capsules. Thirty flowers on the + self-fertilised plants in the same two pots were again self-fertilised, + but produced only seven capsules. The contents of each capsule of both + lots were placed in separate watch-glasses, and the seeds from the crossed + appeared to the eye to be at least double the number of those from the + self-fertilised capsules. + </p> + <p> + In order to ascertain whether the fertility of the self-fertilised plants + had been lessened by the plants having been self-fertilised for the three + previous generations, thirty flowers on the crossed plants were fertilised + with their own pollen. These yielded only five capsules, and their seeds + being placed in separate watch-glasses did not seem more numerous than + those from the capsules on the self-fertilised plants self-fertilised for + the fourth time. So that as far as can be judged from so few capsules, the + self-fertility of the self-fertilised plants had not decreased in + comparison with that of the plants which had been intercrossed during the + three previous generations. It should, however, be remembered that both + lots of plants had been subjected in each generation to almost exactly + similar conditions. + </p> + <p> + Seeds from the crossed plants again crossed, and from the self-fertilised + again self-fertilised, produced by the plants in Pot 1 (Table 6/79), in + which the three self-fertilised plants were on an average only a little + taller than the crossed, were used in the following experiment. They were + kept separate from two similar lots of seeds produced by the two plants in + Pot 4 in the same table, in which the crossed plant was much taller than + its self-fertilised opponent. + </p> + <p> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FOURTH GENERATION (RAISED FROM + THE PLANTS IN POT 1, TABLE 6/79). + </p> + <p> + Crossed and self-fertilised seeds from plants of the last generation in + Pot 1 in Table 6/79, were placed on sand, and after germinating, were + planted in pairs on the opposite sides of four pots. The seedlings when in + full flower were measured to the base of the calyx. The remaining seeds + were sown crowded on the two sides of Pot 5; and the four tallest plants + on each side of this pot were measured in the same manner. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/80. Petunia violacea (fourth generation; raised from plants of the + third generation in Pot 1, table 6/79). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 29 2/8 : 30 2/8. Pot 1 : 36 2/8 : 34 6/8. Pot 1 : 49 : 31 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 33 3/8 : 31 5/8. Pot 2 : 37 3/8 : 38 2/8. Pot 2 : 56 4/8 : 38 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 46 : 45 1/8. Pot 3 : 67 2/8 : 45. Pot 3 : 54 3/8 : 23 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 51 6/8 : 34. Pot 4 : 51 7/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 49 4/8 : 22 3/8. Pot 5 : 46 3/8 : 24 2/8. Pot 5 : 40 : 24 6/8. Pot + 5 : 53 : 30. Crowded plants. + </p> + <p> + Total : 701.88 : 453.50. + </p> + <p> + The fifteen crossed plants average 46.79, and the fourteen (one having + died) self-fertilised plants 32.39 inches in height; or as 100 to 69. So + that the crossed plants in this generation had recovered their wonted + superiority over the self-fertilised plants; though the parents of the + latter in Pot 1, Table 6/79, were a little taller than their crossed + opponents. + </p> + <p> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FOURTH GENERATION (RAISED FROM + THE PLANTS IN POT 4, TABLE 6/79). + </p> + <p> + Two similar lots of seeds, obtained from the plants in Pot 4 in Table + 6/79, in which the single crossed plant was at first shorter, but + ultimately much taller than its self-fertilised opponent, were treated in + every way like their brethren of the same generation in the last + experiment. We have in Table 6/81 the measurements of the present plants. + Although the crossed plants greatly exceeded in height the + self-fertilised; yet in three out of the five pots a self-fertilised plant + flowered before any one of the crossed; in a fourth pot simultaneously; + and in a fifth (namely Pot 2) a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/81. Petunia violacea (fourth generation; raised from plants of the + third generation in Pot 4, Table 6/79). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 46 : 30 2/8. Pot 1 : 46 : 28. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 50 6/8 : 25. Pot 2 : 40 2/8 : 31 3/8. Pot 2 : 37 3/8 : 22 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 54 2/8 : 22 5/8. Pot 3 : 61 1/8 : 26 6/8. Pot 3 : 45 : 32. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 30 : 24 4/8. Pot 4 : 29 1/8 : 26. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 37 4/8 : 40 2/8. Pot 5 : 63 : 18 5/8. Pot 5 : 41 2/8 : 17 4/8. + Crowded plants. + </p> + <p> + Total : 581.63 : 349.36. + </p> + <p> + The thirteen crossed plants here average 44.74, and the thirteen + self-fertilised plants 26.87 inches in height; or as 100 to 60. The + crossed parents of these were much taller, relatively to the + self-fertilised parents, than in the last case; and apparently they + transmitted some of this superiority to their crossed offspring. It is + unfortunate that I did not turn these plants out of doors, so as to + observe their relative fertility, for I compared the pollen from some of + the crossed and self-fertilised plants in Pot 1, Table 6/81, and there was + a marked difference in its state; that of the crossed plants contained + hardly any bad and empty grains, whilst such abounded in the pollen of the + self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <h3> + THE EFFECTS OF A CROSS WITH A FRESH STOCK. + </h3> + <p> + I procured from a garden in Westerham, whence my plants originally came, a + fresh plant differing in no respect from mine except in the colour of the + flowers, which was a fine purple. But this plant must have been exposed + during at least four generations to very different conditions from those + to which my plants had been subjected, as these had been grown in pots in + the greenhouse. Eight flowers on the self-fertilised plants in Table 6/81, + of the last or fourth self-fertilised generation, were fertilised with + pollen from this fresh stock; all eight produced capsules containing + together by weight 5.01 grains of seeds. The plants raised from these + seeds may be called the Westerham-crossed. + </p> + <p> + Eight flowers on the crossed plants of the last or fourth generation in + Table 6/81 were again crossed with pollen from one of the other crossed + plants, and produced five capsules, containing by weight 2.07 grains of + seeds. The plants raised from these seeds may be called the INTERCROSSED; + and these form the fifth intercrossed generation. + </p> + <p> + Eight flowers on the self-fertilised plants of the same generation in + Table 6/81 were again self-fertilised, and produced seven capsules, + containing by weight 2.1 grains of seeds. The SELF-FERTILISED plants + raised from these seeds form the fifth self-fertilised generation. These + latter plants and the intercrossed are comparable in all respects with the + crossed and self-fertilised plants of the four previous generations. + </p> + <p> + From the foregoing data it is easy to calculate that: + </p> + <p> + Ten Westerham-crossed capsules would have contained 6.26 grains weight of + seed. + </p> + <p> + Ten intercrossed capsules would have contained 4.14 grains weight of seed. + </p> + <p> + Ten self-fertilised capsules would have contained 3.00 grains weight of + seed. + </p> + <p> + We thus get the following ratios:— + </p> + <p> + Seeds from the Westerham-crossed capsules to those from the capsules of + the fifth self-fertilised generation, in weight as 100 to 48. + </p> + <p> + Seeds from the Westerham-crossed capsules to those from the capsules of + the fifth intercrossed generation, in weight as 100 to 66. + </p> + <p> + Seeds from the intercrossed capsules to those from the self-fertilised + capsules, in weight as 100 to 72. + </p> + <p> + So that a cross with pollen from a fresh stock greatly increased the + productiveness of the flowers on plants which had been self-fertilised for + the four previous generations, in comparison not only with the flowers on + the same plants self-fertilised for the fifth time, but with the flowers + on the crossed plants crossed with pollen from another plant of the same + old stock for the fifth time. + </p> + <p> + These three lots of seeds were placed on sand, and were planted in an + equal state of germination in seven pots, each made tripartite by three + superficial partitions. Some of the remaining seeds, whether or not in a + state of germination, were thickly sown in an eighth pot. The pots were + kept in the greenhouse, and the plants trained up sticks. They were first + measured to the tops of their stems when coming into flower; and the + twenty-two Westerham-crossed plants then averaged 25.51 inches; the + twenty-three intercrossed plants 30.38; and the twenty-three + self-fertilised plants 23.40 inches in height. We thus get the following + ratios:— + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in height to the self-fertilised as 100 to + 91. + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in height to the intercrossed as 100 to 119. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed plants in height to the self-fertilised as 100 to 77. + </p> + <p> + These plants were again measured when their growth appeared on a casual + inspection to be complete. But in this I was mistaken, for after cutting + them down, I found that the summits of the stems of the Westerham-crossed + plants were still growing vigorously; whilst the intercrossed had almost, + and the self-fertilised had quite completed their growth. Therefore I do + not doubt, if the three lots had been left to grow for another month, that + the ratios would have been somewhat different from those deduced from the + measurements in Table 6/82. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/82. Petunia violacea. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Westerham-Crossed Plants (from self-fertilised Plants of fourth + generation crossed by a fresh stock). + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Intercrossed Plants (Plants of one and the same stock + intercrossed for five generations). + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Self-fertilised Plants (self-fertilised for five generations). + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 64 5/8 : 57 2/8 : 43 6/8. Pot 1 : 24 : 64 : 56 3/8. Pot 1 : 51 4/8 + : 58 6/8 : 31 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 48 7/8 : 59 7/8 : 41 5/8. Pot 2 : 54 4/8 : 58 2/8 : 41 2/8. Pot 2 + : 58 1/8 : 53 : 18 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 62 : 52 2/8 : 46 6/8. Pot 3 : 53 2/8 : 54 6/8 : 45. Pot 3 : 62 7/8 + : 61 6/8 : 19 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 44 4/8 : 58 7/8 : 37 5/8. Pot 4 : 49 2/8 : 65 2/8 : 33 2/8. Pot 4 + : .. : 59 6/8 : 32 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 43 1/8 : 35 6/8 : 41 6/8. Pot 5 : 53 7/8 : 34 6/8 : 26 4/8. Pot 5 + : 53 2/8 : 54 6/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 37 4/8 : 56 : 46 4/8. Pot 6 : 61 : 63 5/8 : 29 6/8. Pot 6 : 0 : 57 + 7/8 : 14 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 59 6/8 : 51 : 43. Pot 7 : 43 4/8 : 49 6/8 : 12 2/8. Pot 7 : 50 5/8 + : 0 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 37 7/8 : 38 5/8 : 21 6/8. Pot 8 : 37 2/8 : 44 5/8 : 14 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 1051.25 : 1190.50 : 697.88. + </p> + <p> + The twenty-one Westerham-crossed plants now averaged 50.05 inches; the + twenty-two intercrossed plants, 54.11 inches; and the twenty-one + self-fertilised plants, 33.23 inches in height. We thus get the following + ratios:— + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in height to the self-fertilised as 100 to + 66. + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in height to the intercrossed as 100 to 108. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed plants in height to the self-fertilised as 100 to 61. + </p> + <p> + We here see that the Westerham-crossed (the offspring of plants + self-fertilised for four generations and then crossed with a fresh stock) + have gained greatly in height, since they were first measured, relatively + to the plants self-fertilised for five generations. They were then as 100 + to 91, and now as 100 to 66 in height. The intercrossed plants (i.e., + those which had been intercrossed for the last five generations) likewise + exceed in height the self-fertilised plants, as occurred in all the + previous generations with the exception of the abnormal plants of the + third generation. On the other hand, the Westerham-crossed plants are + exceeded in height by the intercrossed; and this is a surprising fact, + judging from most of the other strictly analogous cases. But as the + Westerham-crossed plants were still growing vigorously, while the + intercrossed had almost ceased to grow, there can hardly be a doubt that + if left to grow for another month they would have beaten the intercrossed + in height. That they were gaining on them is clear, as when measured + before they were as 100 to 119, and now as only 100 to 108 in height. The + Westerham-crossed plants had also leaves of a darker green, and looked + altogether more vigorous than the intercrossed; and what is much more + important, they produced, as we shall presently see, much heavier + seed-capsules. So that in fact the offspring from the self-fertilised + plants of the fourth generation crossed by a fresh stock were superior to + the intercrossed, as well as to the self-fertilised plants of the fifth + generation—of which latter fact there could not be the least doubt. + </p> + <p> + These three lots of plants were cut down close to the ground and weighed. + The twenty-one Westerham-crossed plants weighed 32 ounces; the twenty-two + intercrossed plants, 34 ounces, and the twenty-one self-fertilised plants + 7 1/4 ounces. The following ratios are calculated for an equal number of + plants of each kind. But as the self-fertilised plants were just beginning + to wither, their relative weight is here slightly too small; and as the + Westerham-crossed were still growing vigorously, their relative weight + with time allowed would no doubt have greatly increased. + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in weight to the self-fertilised as 100 to + 22. + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in weight to the intercrossed as 100 to 101. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed plants in weight to the self-fertilised as 100 to 22.3. + </p> + <p> + We here see, judging by weight instead of as before by height, that the + Westerham-crossed and the intercrossed have an immense advantage over the + self-fertilised. The Westerham-crossed are inferior to the intercrossed by + a mere trifle; but it is almost certain that if they had been allowed to + go on growing for another month, the former would have completely beaten + the latter. + </p> + <p> + As I had an abundance of seeds of the same three lots, from which the + foregoing plants had been raised, these were sown in three long parallel + and adjoining rows in the open ground, so as to ascertain whether under + these circumstances the results would be nearly the same as before. Late + in the autumn (November 13) the ten tallest plants were carefully selected + out of each row, and their heights measured, with the following result:— + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/83. Petunia violacea (plants growing in the open ground). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Westerham-Crossed Plants (from self-fertilised Plants of the + fourth generation crossed by a fresh stock). + </p> + <p> + Column 2: intercrossed Plants (Plants of one and the same stock + intercrossed for five generations). + </p> + <p> + Column 3: self-fertilised Plants (self-fertilised for five generations). + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + 34 2/8 : 38 : 27 3/8. + 36 2/8 : 36 2/8 : 23. + 35 2/8 : 39 5/8 : 25. + 32 4/8 : 37 : 24 1/8. + 37 : 36 : 22 4/8. + 36 4/8 : 41 3/8 : 23 3/8. + 40 7/8 : 37 2/8 : 21 5/8. + 37 2/8 : 40 : 23 4/8. + 38 2/8 : 41 2/8 : 21 3/8. + 38 5/8 : 36 : 21 2/8. + + 366.76 : 382.76 : 233.13. +</pre> + <p> + The ten Westerham-crossed plants here average 36.67 inches in height; the + ten intercrossed plants, 38.27 inches; and the ten self-fertilised, 23.31 + inches. These three lots of plants were also weighed; the + Westerham-crossed plants weighed 28 ounces; the intercrossed plants, 41 + ounces; and the self-fertilised, 14.75 ounces. We thus get the following + ratios:— + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in height to the self-fertilised as 100 to + 63. + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in weight to the self-fertilised as 100 to + 53. + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in height to the intercrossed as 100 to 104. + </p> + <p> + The Westerham-crossed plants in weight to the intercrossed as 100 to 146. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed plants in height to the self-fertilised as 100 to 61. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed plants in weight to the self-fertilised as 100 to 36. + </p> + <p> + Here the relative heights of the three lots are nearly the same (within + three or four per cent) as with the plants in the pots. In weight there is + a much greater difference: the Westerham-crossed exceed the + self-fertilised by much less than they did before; but the self-fertilised + plants in the pots had become slightly withered, as before stated, and + were in consequence unfairly light. The Westerham-crossed plants are here + inferior in weight to the intercrossed plants in a much higher degree than + in the pots; and this appeared due to their being much less branched, + owing to their having germinated in greater numbers and consequently being + much crowded. Their leaves were of a brighter green than those of the + intercrossed and self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <h3> + RELATIVE FERTILITY OF THE THREE LOTS OF PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + None of the plants in pots in the greenhouse ever produced a capsule; and + this may be attributed in chief part to the exclusion of moths. Therefore + the fertility of the three lots could be judged of only by that of the + plants growing out of doors, which from being left uncovered were probably + cross-fertilised. The plants in the three rows were exactly of the same + age and had been subjected to closely similar conditions, so that any + difference in their fertility must be attributed to their different + origin; namely, to the one lot being derived from plants self-fertilised + for four generations and then crossed with a fresh stock; to the second + lot being derived from plants of the same old stock intercrossed for five + generations; and to the third lot being derived from plants + self-fertilised for five generations. All the capsules, some nearly mature + and some only half-grown, were gathered, counted, and weighed from the ten + finest plants in each of the three rows, of which the measurements and + weights have already been given. The intercrossed plants, as we have seen, + were taller and considerably heavier than the plants of the other two + lots, and they produced a greater number of capsules than did even the + Westerham-crossed plants; and this may be attributed to the latter having + grown more crowded and being in consequence less branched. Therefore the + average weight of an equal number of capsules from each lot of plants + seems to be the fairest standard of comparison, as their weights will have + been determined chiefly by the number of the included seeds. As the + intercrossed plants were taller and heavier than the plants of the other + two lots, it might have been expected that they would have produced the + finest or heaviest capsules; but this was very far from being the case. + </p> + <p> + The ten tallest Westerham-crossed plants produced 111 ripe and unripe + capsules, weighing 121.2 grains. Therefore 100 of such capsules would have + weighed 109.18 grains. + </p> + <p> + The ten tallest intercrossed plants produced 129 capsules, weighing 76.45 + grains. Therefore 100 of these capsules would have weighed 59.26 grains. + </p> + <p> + The ten tallest self-fertilised plants produced only 44 capsules, weighing + 22.35 grains. Therefore 100 of these capsules would have weighed 50.79 + grains. + </p> + <p> + From these data we get the following ratios for the fertility of the three + lots, as deduced from the relative weights of an equal number of capsules + from the finest plants in each lot:— + </p> + <p> + Westerham-crossed plants to self-fertilised plants as 100 to 46. + </p> + <p> + Westerham-crossed plants to intercrossed plants as 100 to 54. + </p> + <p> + Intercrossed plants to self-fertilised plants as 100 to 86. + </p> + <p> + We here see how potent the influence of a cross with pollen from a fresh + stock has been on the fertility of plants self-fertilised for four + generations, in comparison with plants of the old stock when either + intercrossed or self-fertilised for five generations; the flowers on all + these plants having been left to be freely crossed by insects or to + fertilise themselves. The Westerham-crossed plants were also much taller + and heavier plants than the self-fertilised, both in the pots and open + ground; but they were less tall and heavy than the intercrossed plants. + This latter result, however, would almost certainly have been reversed, if + the plants had been allowed to grow for another month, as the + Westerham-crossed were still growing vigorously, whilst the intercrossed + had almost ceased to grow. This case reminds us of the somewhat analogous + one of Eschscholtzia, in which plants raised from a cross with a fresh + stock did not grow higher than the self-fertilised or intercrossed plants, + but produced a greater number of seed-capsules, which contained a far + larger average number of seeds. + </p> + <h3> + COLOUR OF THE FLOWERS ON THE ABOVE THREE LOTS OF PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + The original mother-plant, from which the five successive self-fertilised + generations were raised, bore dingy purple flowers. At no time was any + selection practised, and the plants were subjected in each generation to + extremely uniform conditions. The result was, as in some previous cases, + that the flowers on all the self-fertilised plants, both in the pots and + open ground, were absolutely uniform in tint; this being a dull, rather + peculiar flesh colour. This uniformity was very striking in the long row + of plants growing in the open ground, and these first attracted my + attention. I did not notice in which generation the original colour began + to change and to become uniform, but I have every reason to believe that + the change was gradual. The flowers on the intercrossed plants were mostly + of the same tint, but not nearly so uniform as those on the + self-fertilised plants, and many of them were pale, approaching almost to + white. The flowers on the plants from the cross with the purple-flowered + Westerham stock were, as might have been expected, much more purple and + not nearly so uniform in tint. The self-fertilised plants were also + remarkably uniform in height, as judged by the eye; the intercrossed less + so, whilst the Westerham-crossed plants varied much in height. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum. + </p> + <p> + This plant offers a curious case. Out of six trials with crossed and + self-fertilised plants, belonging to three successive generations, in one + alone did the crossed show any marked superiority in height over the + self-fertilised; in four of the trials they were approximately equal; and + in one (i.e., in the first generation) the self-fertilised plants were + greatly superior to the crossed. In no case did the capsules from flowers + fertilised with pollen from a distinct plant yield many more, and + sometimes they yielded much fewer seeds than the capsules from + self-fertilised flowers. But when the flowers of one variety were crossed + with pollen from a slightly different variety, which had grown under + somewhat different conditions,—that is, by a fresh stock,—the + seedlings derived from this cross exceeded in height and weight those from + the self-fertilised flowers in an extraordinary degree. + </p> + <p> + Twelve flowers on some plants of the common tobacco, raised from purchased + seeds, were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant of the same lot, and + these produced ten capsules. Twelve flowers on the same plants were + fertilised with their own pollen, and produced eleven capsules. The seeds + in the ten crossed capsules weighed 31.7 grains, whilst those in ten of + the self-fertilised capsules weighed 47.67 grains; or as 100 to 150. The + much greater productiveness of the self-fertilised than of the crossed + capsules can hardly be attributed to chance, as all the capsules of both + lots were very fine and healthy ones. + </p> + <p> + The seeds were placed on sand, and several pairs in an equal state of + germination were planted on the opposite sides of three pots. The + remaining seeds were thickly sown on the two sides of Pot 4, so that the + plants in this pot were much crowded. The tallest plant on each side of + each pot was measured. Whilst the plants were quite young the four tallest + crossed plants averaged 7.87 inches, and the four tallest self-fertilised + 14.87 inches in height; or as 100 to 189. The heights at this age are + given in the two left columns of Table 6/84. + </p> + <p> + When in full flower the tallest plants on each side were again measured, + see the two right hand columns in Table 6/84. But I should state that the + pots were not large enough, and the plants never grew to their proper + height. The four tallest crossed plants now averaged 18.5, and the four + tallest self-fertilised plants 32.75 inches in height; or as 100 to 178. + In all four pots a self-fertilised plant flowered before any one of the + crossed. + </p> + <p> + In Pot 4, in which the plants were extremely crowded, the two lots were at + first equal; and ultimately the tallest crossed plant exceeded by a trifle + the tallest self-fertilised plant. This recalled to my mind an analogous + case in the one generation of Petunia, in which the self-fertilised plants + were throughout their growth taller than the crossed in all the pots + except in the crowded one. Accordingly another trial was made, and some of + the same crossed and self-fertilised seeds of tobacco were sown thickly on + opposite sides of two additional pots; the plants being left to grow up + much crowded. When they were between 13 and 14 inches in height there was + no difference between the two sides, nor was there any marked difference + when the plants had grown as tall as they could; for in one pot the + tallest crossed plant was 26 1/2 inches in height, and exceeded by 2 + inches the tallest self-fertilised plant, whilst in the other pot, the + tallest crossed plant was shorter by 3 1/2 inches than the tallest + self-fertilised plant, which was 22 inches in height. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/84. Nicotiana tabacum (first generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants, May 20, 1868. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: self-fertilised Plants, May 20, 1868. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Crossed Plants, December 6, 1868. + </p> + <p> + Column 5: self-fertilised Plants, December 6, 1868. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 15 4/8 : 26 : 40 : 44. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 3 : 15 : 6 4/8 : 43. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 8 : 13 4/8 : 16 : 33. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 5 : 5 : 11 4/8 : 11. + </p> + <p> + Total : 31.5 : 59.5 : 74.0 : 131.0. + </p> + <p> + As the plants did not grow to their proper height in the above small pots + in Table 6/84, four crossed and four self-fertilised plants were raised + from the same seed, and were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of + four very large pots containing rich soil; so that they were not exposed + to at all severe mutual competition. When these plants were in flower I + neglected to measure them, but record in my notes that all four + self-fertilised plants exceeded in height the four crossed plants by 2 or + 3 inches. We have seen that the flowers on the original or parent-plants + which were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant yielded much fewer + seeds than those fertilised with their own pollen; and the trial just + given, as well as that in Table 6/84, show us clearly that the plants + raised from the crossed seeds were inferior in height to those from the + self-fertilised seeds; but only when not greatly crowded. When crowded and + thus subjected to very severe competition, the crossed and self-fertilised + plants were nearly equal in height. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + Twelve flowers on the crossed plants of the last generation growing in the + four large pots just mentioned, were crossed with pollen from a crossed + plant growing in one of the other pots; and twelve flowers on the + self-fertilised plants were fertilised with their own pollen. All these + flowers of both lots produced fine capsules. Ten of the crossed capsules + contained by weight 38.92 grains of seeds, and ten of the self-fertilised + capsules 37.74 grains; or as 100 to 97. Some of these seeds in an equal + state of germination were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of five + large pots. A good many of the crossed seeds germinated before the + self-fertilised, and were of course rejected. The plants thus raised were + measured when several of them were in full flower. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/85. Nicotiana tabacum (second generation). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 14 4/8 : 27 6/8. Pot 1 : 78 4/8 : 8 6/8. Pot 1 : 9 : 56. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 60 4/8 : 16 6/8. Pot 2 : 44 6/8 : 7. Pot 2 : 10 : 50 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 57 1/8 : 87 (A). Pot 3 : 1 2/8 : 81 2/8 (B). + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 6 6/8 : 19. Pot 4 : 31 : 43 2/8. Pot 4 : 69 4/8 : 4. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 99 4/8 : 9 4/8. Pot 5 : 29 2/8 : 3. + </p> + <p> + Total : 511.63 : 413.75. + </p> + <p> + The thirteen crossed plants here average 39.35, and the thirteen + self-fertilised plants 31.82 inches in height; or as 100 to 81. But it + would be a very much fairer plan to exclude all the starved plants of only + 10 inches and under in height; and in this case the nine remaining crossed + plants average 53.84, and the seven remaining self-fertilised plants 51.78 + inches in height, or as 100 to 96; and this difference is so small that + the crossed and self-fertilised plants may be considered as of equal + heights. + </p> + <p> + In addition to these plants, three crossed plants were planted separately + in three large pots, and three self-fertilised plants in three other large + pots, so that they were not exposed to any competition; and now the + self-fertilised plants exceeded the crossed in height by a little, for the + three crossed averaged 55.91, and the three self-fertilised 59.16 inches; + or as 100 to 106. + </p> + <h3> + CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE THIRD GENERATION. + </h3> + <p> + TABLE 6/86. Nicotiana tabacum (third generation). Seedlings from the + self-fertilised plant A in pot 3, Table 6/85, of the last or second + generation. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: From Self-fertilised Plant, crossed by a Crossed Plant. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: From Self-fertilised Plant again self-fertilised, forming the + third Self-fertilised generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 100 2/8 : 98. Pot 1 : 91 : 79. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 110 2/8 : 59 1/8. Pot 2 : 100 4/8 : 66 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 104 : 79 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 84 2/8 : 110 4/8. Pot 4 : 76 4/8 : 64 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 666.75 : 557.25. + </p> + <p> + As I wished to ascertain, firstly, whether those self-fertilised plants of + the last generation, which greatly exceeded in height their crossed + opponents, would transmit the same tendency to their offspring, and + secondly, whether they possessed the same sexual constitution, I selected + for experiment the two self-fertilised plants marked A and B in Pot 3 in + Table 6/85, as these two were of nearly equal height, and were greatly + superior to their crossed opponents. Four flowers on each plant were + fertilised with their own pollen, and four others on the same plants were + crossed with pollen from one of the crossed plants growing in another pot. + This plan differs from that before followed, in which seedlings from + crossed plants again crossed, have been compared with seedlings from + self-fertilised plants again self-fertilised. The seeds from the crossed + and self-fertilised capsules of the above two plants were placed in + separate watch-glasses and compared, but were not weighed; and in both + cases those from the crossed capsules seemed to be rather less numerous + than those from the self-fertilised capsules. These seeds were planted in + the usual manner, and the heights of the crossed and self-fertilised + seedlings, when fully grown, are given in Tables 6/86 and 6/87. + </p> + <p> + The seven crossed plants in the first of these two tables average 95.25, + and the seven self-fertilised 79.6 inches in height; or as 100 to 83. In + half the pots a crossed plant, and in the other half a self-fertilised + plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + We now come to the seedlings raised from the other parent-plant B. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/87. Nicotiana tabacum (third generation). Seedlings from the + self-fertilised plant B in pot 3, Table 6/85, of the last or second + generation. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: From Self-fertilised Plant, crossed by a Crossed Plant. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: From Self-fertilised Plant again self-fertilised, forming the + third Self-fertilised generation. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 87 2/8 : 72 4/8. Pot 1 : 49 : 14 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 98 4/8 : 73. Pot 2 : 0 : 110 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 99 : 106 4/8. Pot 3 : 15 2/8 : 73 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 97 6/8 : 48 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 48 6/8 : 81 2/8. Pot 5 : 0 : 61 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 495.50 : 641.75. + </p> + <p> + The seven crossed plants (for two of them died) here average 70.78 inches, + and the nine self-fertilised plants 71.3 inches in height; or as 100 to + barely 101. In four out of these five pots, a self-fertilised plant + flowered before any one of the crossed plants. So that, differently from + the last case, the self-fertilised plants are in some respects slightly + superior to the crossed. + </p> + <p> + If we now consider the crossed and self-fertilised plants of the three + generations, we find an extraordinary diversity in their relative heights. + In the first generation, the crossed plants were inferior to the + self-fertilised as 100 to 178; and the flowers on the original + parent-plants which were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant yielded + much fewer seeds than the self-fertilised flowers, in the proportion of + 100 to 150. But it is a strange fact that the self-fertilised plants, + which were subjected to very severe competition with the crossed, had on + two occasions no advantage over them. The inferiority of the crossed + plants of this first generation cannot be attributed to the immaturity of + the seeds, for I carefully examined them; nor to the seeds being diseased + or in any way injured in some one capsule, for the contents of the ten + crossed capsules were mingled together and a few taken by chance for + sowing. In the second generation the crossed and self-fertilised plants + were nearly equal in height. In the third generation, crossed and + self-fertilised seeds were obtained from two plants of the previous + generation, and the seedlings raised from them differed remarkably in + constitution; the crossed in the one case exceeded the self-fertilised in + height in the ratio of 100 to 83, and in the other case were almost equal. + This difference between the two lots, raised at the same time from two + plants growing in the same pot, and treated in every respect alike, as + well as the extraordinary superiority of the self-fertilised over the + crossed plants in the first generation, considered together, make me + believe that some individuals of the present species differ to a certain + extent from others in their sexual affinities (to use the term employed by + Gartner), like closely allied species of the same genus. Consequently if + two plants which thus differ are crossed, the seedlings suffer and are + beaten by those from the self-fertilised flowers, in which the sexual + elements are of the same nature. It is known that with our domestic + animals certain individuals are sexually incompatible, and will not + produce offspring, although fertile with other individuals. (6/3. I have + given evidence on this head in my ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under + Domestication’ chapter 18 2nd edition volume 2 page 146.) But Kolreuter + has recorded a case which bears more closely on our present one, as it + shows that in the genus Nicotiana the varieties differ in their sexual + affinities. (6/4. ‘Das Geschlecht der Pflanzen, Zweite Fortsetzung’ 1764 + pages 55-60.) He experimented on five varieties of the common tobacco, and + proved that they were varieties by showing that they were perfectly + fertile when reciprocally crossed; but one of these varieties, if used + either as the father or the mother, was more fertile than any of the + others when crossed with a widely distinct species, N. glutinosa. As the + different varieties thus differ in their sexual affinities, there is + nothing surprising in the individuals of the same variety differing in a + like manner to a slight degree. + </p> + <p> + Taking the plants of the three generations altogether, the crossed show no + superiority over the self-fertilised, and I can account for this fact only + by supposing that with this species, which is perfectly self-fertile + without insect aid, most of the individuals are in the same condition, as + those of the same variety of the common pea and of a few other exotic + plants, which have been self-fertilised for many generations. In such + cases a cross between two individuals does no good; nor does it in any + case, unless the individuals differ in general constitution, either from + so-called spontaneous variation, or from their progenitors having been + subjected to different conditions. I believe that this is the true + explanation in the present instance, because, as we shall immediately see, + the offspring of plants, which did not profit at all by being crossed with + a plant of the same stock, profited to an extraordinary degree by a cross + with a slightly different sub-variety. + </p> + <h3> + THE EFFECTS OF A CROSS WITH A FRESH STOCK. + </h3> + <p> + I procured some seed of N. tabacum from Kew and raised some plants, which + formed a slightly different sub-variety from my former plants; as the + flowers were a shade pinker, the leaves a little more pointed, and the + plants not quite so tall. Therefore the advantage in height which the + seedlings gained by this cross cannot be attributed to direct inheritance. + Two of the plants of the third self-fertilised generation, growing in Pots + 2 and 5 in Table 6/87, which exceeded in height their crossed opponents + (as did their parents in a still higher degree) were fertilised with + pollen from the Kew plants, that is, by a fresh stock. The seedlings thus + raised may be called the Kew-crossed. Some other flowers on the same two + plants were fertilised with their own pollen, and the seedlings thus + raised from the fourth self-fertilised generation. The crossed capsules + produced by the plant in Pot 2, Table 6/87, were plainly less fine than + the self-fertilised capsules on the same plant. In Pot 5 the one finest + capsule was also a self-fertilised one; but the seeds produced by the two + crossed capsules together exceeded in number those produced by the two + self-fertilised capsules on the same plant. Therefore as far as the + flowers on the parent-plants are concerned, a cross with pollen from a + fresh stock did little or no good; and I did not expect that the offspring + would have received any benefit, but in this I was completely mistaken. + </p> + <p> + The crossed and self-fertilised seeds from the two plants were placed on + bare sand, and very many of the crossed seeds of both sets germinated + before the self-fertilised seeds, and protruded their radicles at a + quicker rate. Hence many of the crossed seeds had to be rejected, before + pairs in an equal state of germination were obtained for planting on the + opposite sides of sixteen large pots. The two series of seedlings raised + from the parent-plants in the two Pots 2 and 5 were kept separate, and + when fully grown were measured to the tips of their highest leaves, as + shown in Table 6/88. But as there was no uniform difference in height + between the crossed and self-fertilised seedlings raised from the two + plants, their heights have been added together in calculating the + averages. I should state that by the accidental fall of a large bush in + the greenhouse, several plants in both the series were much injured. These + were at once measured together with their opponents and afterwards thrown + away. The others were left to grow to their full height, and were measured + when in flower. This accident accounts for the small height of some of the + pairs; but as all the pairs, whether only partly or fully grown, were + measured at the same time, the measurements are fair. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the twenty-six crossed plants in the sixteen pots of + the two series is 63.29, and that of the twenty-six self-fertilised plants + is 41.67 inches; or as 100 to 66. The superiority of the crossed plants + was shown in another way, for in every one of the sixteen pots a crossed + plant flowered before a self-fertilised one, with the exception of Pot 6 + of the second series, in which the plants on the two sides flowered + simultaneously. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/88. Nicotiana tabacum. Plants raised from two plants of the third + self-fertilised generation in Pots 2 and 5, in Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Kew-crossed Plants, pot 2, Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Plants of the fourth Self-fertilised generation, pot 2, Table + 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Kew-crossed Plants, pot 5, Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 5: Plants of the fourth Self-fertilised generation, pot 5, Table + 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 84 6/8 : 68 4/8 : 77 6/8 : 56. Pot 1 : 31 : 5 : 7 2/8 : 5 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 78 4/8 : 51 4/8 : 55 4/8 : 27 6/8. Pot 2 : 48 : 70 : 18 : 7. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 77 3/8 : 12 6/8 : 76 2/8 : 60 6/8. Pot 3 : 77 1/8 : 6 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 49 2/8 : 29 4/8 : 90 4/8 : 11 6/8. Pot 4 : 15 6/8 : 32 : 22 2/8 : + 4 1/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 89 : 85 : 94 2/8 : 28 4/8. Pot 5 : 17 : 5 3/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 90 : 80 : 78 : 78 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 84 4/8 : 48 6/8 : 85 4/8 : 61 4/8. Pot 7 : 76 4/8 : 56 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 83 4/8 : 84 4/8 : 65 5/8 : 78 3/8. Pot 8 : : : 72 2/8 : 27 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 902.63 : 636.13 : 743.13 : 447.38. + </p> + <p> + Some of the remaining seeds of both series, whether or not in a state of + germination, were thickly sown on the opposite sides of two very large + pots; and the six highest plants on each side of each pot were measured + after they had grown to nearly their full height. But their heights were + much less than in the former trials, owing to their extremely crowded + condition. Even whilst quite young, the crossed seedlings manifestly had + much broader and finer leaves than the self-fertilised seedlings. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/89. Nicotiana tabacum. Plants of the same parentage as those in + Table 6/88, but grown extremely crowded in two large pots. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Kew-crossed Plants, from pot 2, Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants of the fourth Self-fertilised generation, from pot 2, + Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Kew-crossed Plants, from pot 5, Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Plants of the fourth Self-fertilised generation, from pot 5, + Table 6/87. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + 42 4/8 : 22 4/8 : 44 6/8 : 22 4/8. + 34 : 19 2/8 : 42 4/8 : 21. + 30 4/8 : 14 2/8 : 27 4/8 : 18. + 23 4/8 : 16 : 31 2/8 : 15 2/8. + 26 6/8 : 13 4/8 : 32 : 13 5/8. + 18 3/8 : 16 : 24 6/8 : 14 6/8. +</pre> + <h3> + 175.63 : 101.50 : 202.75 : 105.13. + </h3> + <p> + The twelve tallest crossed plants in the two pots belonging to the two + series average here 31.53, and the twelve tallest self-fertilised plants + 17.21 inches in height; or as 100 to 54. The plants on both sides, when + fully grown, some time after they had been measured, were cut down close + to the ground and weighed. The twelve crossed plants weighed 21.25 ounces; + and the twelve self-fertilised plants only 7.83 ounces; or in weight as + 100 to 37. + </p> + <p> + The rest of the crossed and self-fertilised seeds from the two + parent-plants (the same as in the last experiment) was sown on the 1st of + July in four long parallel and separate rows in good soil in the open + ground; so that the seedlings were not subjected to any mutual + competition. The summer was wet and unfavourable for their growth. Whilst + the seedlings were very small the two crossed rows had a clear advantage + over the two self-fertilised rows. When fully grown the twenty tallest + crossed plants and the twenty tallest self-fertilised plants were selected + and measured on the 11th of November to the extremities of their leaves, + as shown in Table 6/90. Of the twenty crossed plants, twelve had flowered; + whilst of the twenty self-fertilised plants one alone had flowered. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/90. Nicotiana tabacum. Plants raised from the same seeds as in the + last two experiments, but sown separately in the open ground, so as not to + compete together. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Kew-crossed Plants, from pot 2, Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants of the fourth Self-fertilised generation, from pot 2, + Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Kew-crossed Plants, from pot 5, Table 6/87. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Plants of the fourth Self-fertilised generation, from pot 5, + Table 6/87. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + 42 2/8 : 22 6/8 : 54 4/8 : 34 4/8. + 54 5/8 : 37 4/8 : 51 4/8 : 38 5/8. + 39 3/8 : 34 4/8 : 45 : 40 6/8. + 53 2/8 : 30 : 43 : 43 2/8. + 49 3/8 : 28 6/8 : 43 : 40. + 50 3/8 : 31 2/8 : 48 6/8 : 38 2/8. + 47 1/8 : 25 4/8 : 44 : 35 6/8. + 57 3/8 : 26 2/8 : 48 2/8 : 39 6/8. + 37 : 22 3/8 : 55 1/8 : 47 6/8. + 48 : 28 : 63 : 58 5/8. +</pre> + <h3> + 478.75 : 286.86 : 496.13 : 417.25 + </h3> + <p> + The twenty tallest crossed plants here average 48.74, and the twenty + tallest self-fertilised 35.2 inches in height; or as 100 to 72. These + plants after being measured were cut down close to the ground, and the + twenty crossed plants weighed 195.75 ounces, and the twenty + self-fertilised plants 123.25 ounces; or as 100 to 63. + </p> + <p> + In Tables 6/88, 6/89 and 6/90, we have the measurements of fifty-six + plants derived from two plants of the third self-fertilised generation + crossed with pollen from a fresh stock, and of fifty-six plants of the + fourth self-fertilised generation derived from the same two plants. These + crossed and self-fertilised plants were treated in three different ways, + having been put, firstly, into moderately close competition with one + another in pots; secondly, having been subjected to unfavourable + conditions and to very severe competition from being greatly crowded in + two large pots; and thirdly, having been sown separately in open and good + ground, so as not to suffer from any mutual competition. In all these + cases the crossed plants in each lot were greatly superior to the + self-fertilised. This was shown in several ways,—by the earlier + germination of the crossed seeds, by the more rapid growth of the + seedlings whilst quite young, by the earlier flowering of the mature + plants, as well as by the greater height which they ultimately attained. + The superiority of the crossed plants was shown still more plainly when + the two lots were weighed; the weight of the crossed plants to that of the + self-fertilised in the two crowded pots being as 100 to 37. Better + evidence could hardly be desired of the immense advantage derived from a + cross with a fresh stock. + </p> + <p> + 26. PRIMULACEAE.—Cyclamen persicum. (6/5. Cyclamen repandum + according to Lecoq ‘Geographie Botanique de l’Europe’ tome 8 1858 page + 150, is proterandrous, and this I believe to be the case with Cyclamen + persicum.) + </p> + <p> + Ten flowers crossed with pollen from plants known to be distinct + seedlings, yielded nine capsules, containing on an average 34.2 seeds, + with a maximum of seventy-seven in one. Ten flowers self-fertilised + yielded eight capsules, containing on an average only 13.1 seeds, with a + maximum of twenty-five in one. This gives a ratio of 100 to 38 for the + average number of seeds per capsule for the crossed and self-fertilised + flowers. The flowers hang downwards, and as the stigmas stand close + beneath the anthers, it might have been expected that pollen would have + fallen on them, and that they would have been spontaneously + self-fertilised; but these covered-up plants did not produce a single + capsule. On some other occasions uncovered plants in the same greenhouse + produced plenty of capsules, and I suppose that the flowers had been + visited by bees, which could hardly fail to carry pollen from plant to + plant. + </p> + <p> + The seeds obtained in the manner just described were placed on sand, and + after germinating were planted in pairs,—three crossed and three + self-fertilised plants on the opposite sides of four pots. When the leaves + were 2 or 3 inches in length, including the foot-stalks, the seedlings on + both sides were equal. In the course of a month or two the crossed plants + began to show a slight superiority over the self-fertilised, which + steadily increased; and the crossed flowered in all four pots some weeks + before, and much more profusely than the self-fertilised. The two tallest + flower-stems on the crossed plants in each pot were now measured, and the + average height of the eight stems was 9.49 inches. After a considerable + interval of time the self-fertilised plants flowered, and several of their + flower-stems (but I forgot to record how many) were roughly measured, and + their average height was a little under 7.5 inches; so that the + flower-stems on the crossed plants to those on the self-fertilised were at + least as 100 to 79. The reason why I did not make more careful + measurements of the self-fertilised plants was, that they looked such poor + specimens that I determined to there them re-potted in larger pots and in + the following year to measure them carefully; but we shall see that this + was partly frustrated by so few flower-stems being then produced. + </p> + <p> + These plants were left uncovered in the greenhouse; and the twelve crossed + plants produced forty capsules, whilst the twelve self-fertilised plants + produced only five; or as 100 to 12. But this difference does not give a + just idea of the relative fertility of the two lots. I counted the seeds + in one of the finest capsules on the crossed plants, and it contained + seventy-three; whilst the finest of the five capsules produced by the + self-fertilised plants contained only thirty-five good seeds. In the other + four capsules most of the seeds were barely half as large as those in the + crossed capsules. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/91. Cyclamen persicum: 0 implies that no flower-stem was produced. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 10 : 0. Pot 1 : 9 2/8 : 0. Pot 1 : 10 2/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 9 2/8 : 0. Pot 2 : 10 : 0. Pot 2 : 10 2/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 9 1/8 : 8. Pot 3 : 9 5/8 : 6 7/8. Pot 3 : 9 5/8 : 6 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 11 1/8 : 0. Pot 4 : 10 5/8 : 7 7/8. Pot 4 : 10 6/8 : 0. + </p> + <p> + Total : 119.88 : 29.50. + </p> + <p> + In the following year the crossed plants again bore many flowers before + the self-fertilised bore a single one. The three tallest flower-stems on + the crossed plants in each of the pots were measured, as shown in Table + 6/91. In Pots 1 and 2 the self-fertilised plants did not produce a single + flower-stem; in Pot 4 only one; and in Pot 3 six, of which the three + tallest were measured. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the twelve flower-stems on the crossed plants is + 9.99, and that of the four flower-stems on the self-fertilised plants 7.37 + inches; or as 100 to 74. The self-fertilised plants were miserable + specimens, whilst the crossed ones looked very vigorous. + </p> + <h3> + ANAGALLIS. + </h3> + <p> + Anagallis collina, var. grandiflora (pale red and blue-flowered + sub-varieties). + </p> + <p> + Firstly, twenty-five flowers on some plants of the red variety were + crossed with pollen from a distinct plant of the same variety, and + produced ten capsules; thirty-one flowers were fertilised with their own + pollen, and produced eighteen capsules. These plants, which were grown in + pots in the greenhouse, were evidently in a very sterile condition, and + the seeds in both sets of capsules, especially in the self-fertilised, + although numerous, were of so poor a quality that it was very difficult to + determine which were good and which bad. But as far as I could judge, the + crossed capsules contained on an average 6.3 good seeds, with a maximum in + one of thirteen; whilst the self-fertilised contained 6.05 such seeds, + with a maximum in one of fourteen. + </p> + <p> + Secondly, eleven flowers on the red variety were castrated whilst young + and fertilised with pollen from the blue variety, and this cross evidently + much increased their fertility; for the eleven flowers yielded seven + capsules, which contained on an average twice as many good seeds as + before, namely, 12.7; with a maximum in two of the capsules of seventeen + seeds. Therefore these crossed capsules yielded seeds compared with those + in the foregoing self-fertilised capsules, as 100 to 48. These seeds were + also conspicuously larger than those from the cross between two + individuals of the same red variety, and germinated much more freely. The + flowers on most of the plants produced by the cross between the + two-coloured varieties (of which several were raised), took after their + mother, and were red-coloured. But on two of the plants the flowers were + plainly stained with blue, and to such a degree in one case as to be + almost intermediate in tint. + </p> + <p> + The crossed seeds of the two foregoing kinds and the self-fertilised were + sown on the opposite sides of two large pots, and the seedlings were + measured when fully grown, as shown in Tables 6/92a and 6/92b. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/92a. Anagallis collina: Red variety crossed by a distinct plant of + the red variety, and red variety self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 23 4/8 : 15 4/8. Pot 1 : 21 : 15 4/8. Pot 1 : 17 2/8 : 14. + </p> + <p> + Total : 61.75 : 45.00. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/92b. Anagallis collina: Red variety crossed by blue variety, and + red variety self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 30 4/8 : 24 4/8. Pot 2 : 27 3/8 : 18 4/8. Pot 2 : 25 : 11 6/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 82.88 : 54.75. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Total of both lots: + : 144.63 : 99.75. +</pre> + <p> + As the plants of the two lots are few in number, they may be run together + for the general average; but I may first state that the height of the + seedlings from the cross between two individuals of the red variety is to + that of the self-fertilised plants of the red variety as 100 to 73; + whereas the height of the crossed offspring from the two varieties to the + self-fertilised plants of the red variety is as 100 to 66. So that the + cross between the two varieties is here seen to be the most advantageous. + The average height of all six crossed plants in the two lots taken + together is 48.20, and that of the six self-fertilised plants 33.25; or as + 100 to 69. + </p> + <p> + These six crossed plants produced spontaneously twenty-six capsules, + whilst the six self-fertilised plants produced only two, or as 100 to 8. + There is therefore the same extraordinary difference in fertility between + the crossed and self-fertilised plants as in the last genus, Cyclamen, + which belongs to the same family of the Primulaceae. + </p> + <p> + Primula veris. British flora. (var. officinalis, Linn.). + </p> + <h3> + THE COWSLIP. + </h3> + <p> + Most of the species in this genus are heterostyled or dimorphic; that is, + they present two forms,—one long-styled with short stamens, and the + other short-styled with long stamens. (6/6. See my paper ‘On the Two Forms + or Dimorphic Condition in the Species of Primula’ in ‘Journal of the + Proceedings of the Linnean Society’ volume 6 1862 page 77. A second paper, + to which I presently refer ‘On the Hybrid-like Nature of the Offspring + from the Illegitimate Unions of Dimorphic and Trimorphic Plants’ was + published in volume 10 1867 page 393 of the same journal.) For complete + fertilisation it is necessary that pollen from the one form should be + applied to the stigma of the other form; and this is effected under nature + by insects. Such unions, and the seedlings raised from them, I have called + legitimate. If one form is fertilised with pollen from the same form, the + full complement of seed is not produced; and in the case of some + heterostyled genera no seed at all is produced. Such unions, and the + seedlings raised from them, I have called illegitimate. These seedlings + are often dwarfed and more or less sterile, like hybrids. I possessed some + long-styled plants of Primula veris, which during four successive + generations had been produced from illegitimate unions between long-styled + plants; they were, moreover, in some degree inter-related, and had been + subjected all the time to similar conditions in pots in the greenhouse. As + long as they were cultivated in this manner, they grew well and were + healthy and fertile. Their fertility even increased in the later + generations, as if they were becoming habituated to illegitimate + fertilisation. Plants of the first illegitimate generation when taken from + the greenhouse and planted in moderately good soil out of doors grew well + and were healthy; but when those of the two last illegitimate generations + were thus treated they became excessively sterile and dwarfed, and + remained so during the following year, by which time they ought to have + become accustomed to growing out of doors, so that they must have + possessed a weak constitution. + </p> + <p> + Under these circumstances, it seemed advisable to ascertain what would be + the effect of legitimately crossing long-styled plants of the fourth + illegitimate generation with pollen taken from non-related short-styled + plants, growing under different conditions. Accordingly several flowers on + plants of the fourth illegitimate generation (i.e., + great-great-grandchildren of plants which had been legitimately + fertilised), growing vigorously in pots in the greenhouse, were + legitimately fertilised with pollen from an almost wild short-styled + cowslip, and these flowers yielded some fine capsules. Thirty other + flowers on the same illegitimate plants were fertilised with their own + pollen, and these yielded seventeen capsules, containing on an average + thirty-two seeds. This is a high degree of fertility; higher, I believe, + than that which generally obtains with illegitimately fertilised + long-styled plants growing out of doors, and higher than that of the + previous illegitimate generations, although their flowers were fertilised + with pollen taken from a distinct plant of the same form. + </p> + <p> + These two lots of seeds were sown (for they will not germinate well when + placed on bare sand) on the opposite sides of four pots, and the seedlings + were thinned, so that an equal number were left on the two sides. For some + time there was no marked difference in height between the two lots; and in + Pot 3, Table 6/93, the self-fertilised plants were rather the tallest. But + by the time that they had thrown up young flower-stems, the legitimately + crossed plants revealed much the finest, and had greener and larger + leaves. The breadth of the largest leaf on each plant was measured, and + those on the crossed plants were on an average a quarter of an inch + (exactly .28 of an inch) broader than those on the self-fertilised plants. + The plants, from being too much crowded, produced poor and short + flower-stems. The two finest on each side were measured; the eight on the + legitimately crossed plants averaged 4.08, and the eight on the + illegitimately self-fertilised plants averaged 2.93 inches in height; or + as 100 to 72. + </p> + <p> + These plants after they had flowered were turned out of their pots, and + planted in fairly good soil in the open ground. In the following year + (1870), when in full flower, the two tallest flower-stems on each side + were again measured, as shown in Table 6/93, which likewise gives the + number of flower-stems produced on both sides of all the pots. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/93. Primula veris. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Height: Legitimately crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Number of Flower-stems produced: Legitimately crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Height: Illegitimately crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 5: Number of Flower-stems produced: Illegitimately crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 9 : 16 : 2 1/8 : 3. Pot 1 : 8 : : 3 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 7 : 16 : 6 : 3. Pot 2 : 6 4/8 : : 5 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 6 : 16 : 3 : 4. Pot 3 : 6 2/8 : : 0 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 7 3/8 : 14 : 2 5/8 : 5. Pot 4 : 6 1/8 : : 2 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 56.26 : 62 : 25.75 : 15. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the eight tallest flower-stems on the crossed plants + is here 7.03 inches, and that of the eight tallest flower-stems on the + self-fertilised plants 3.21 inches; or as 100 to 46. We see, also, that + the crossed plants bore sixty-two flower-stems; that is, above four times + as many as those (namely fifteen) borne by the self-fertilised plants. The + flowers were left exposed to the visits of insects, and as many plants of + both forms grew close by, they must have been legitimately and naturally + fertilised. Under these circumstances the crossed plants produced 324 + capsules, whilst the self-fertilised produced only 16; and these were all + produced by a single plant in Pot 2, which was much finer than any other + self-fertilised plant. Judging by the number of capsules produced, the + fertility of an equal number of crossed and self-fertilised plants was as + 100 to 5. + </p> + <p> + In the succeeding year (1871) I did not count all the flower-stems on + these plants, but only those which produced capsules containing good + seeds. The season was unfavourable, and the crossed plants produced only + forty such flower-stems, bearing 168 good capsules, whilst the + self-fertilised plants produced only two such flower-stems, bearing only 6 + capsules, half of which were very poor ones. So that the fertility of the + two lots, judging by the number of capsules, was as 100 to 3.5. + </p> + <p> + In considering the great difference in height and the wonderful difference + in fertility between the two sets of plants, we should bear in mind that + this is the result of two distinct agencies. The self-fertilised plants + were the product of illegitimate fertilisation during five successive + generations, in all of which, excepting the last, the plants had been + fertilised with pollen taken from a distinct individual belonging to the + same form, but which was more or less closely related. The plants had also + been subjected in each generation to closely similar conditions. This + treatment alone, as I know from other observations, would have greatly + reduced the size and fertility of the offspring. On the other hand, the + crossed plants were the offspring of long-styled plants of the fourth + illegitimate generation legitimately crossed with pollen from a + short-styled plant, which, as well as its progenitors, had been exposed to + very different conditions; and this latter circumstance alone would have + given great vigour to the offspring, as we may infer from the several + analogous cases already given. How much proportional weight ought to be + attributed to these two agencies,—the one tending to injure the + self-fertilised offspring, and the other to benefit the crossed offspring,—cannot + be determined. But we shall immediately see that the greater part of the + benefit, as far as increased fertility is concerned, must be attributed to + the cross having been made with a fresh stock. + </p> + <p> + Primula veris. + </p> + <h3> + EQUAL-STYLED AND RED-FLOWERED VAR. + </h3> + <p> + I have described in my paper ‘On the Illegitimate Unions of Dimorphic and + Trimorphic Plants’ this remarkable variety, which was sent to me from + Edinburgh by Mr. J. Scott. It possessed a pistil proper to the long-styled + form, and stamens proper to the short-styled form; so that it had lost the + heterostyled or dimorphic character common to most of the species of the + genus, and may be compared with an hermaphrodite form of a bisexual + animal. Consequently the pollen and stigma of the same flower are adapted + for complete mutual fertilisation, instead of its being necessary that + pollen should be brought from one form to another, as in the common + cowslip. From the stigma and anthers standing nearly on the same level, + the flowers are perfectly self-fertile when insects are excluded. Owing to + the fortunate existence of this variety, it is possible to fertilise its + flowers in a legitimate manner with their own pollen, and to cross other + flowers in a legitimate manner with pollen from another variety or fresh + stock. Thus the offspring from both unions can be compared quite fairly, + free from any doubt from the injurious effects of an illegitimate union. + </p> + <p> + The plants on which I experimented had been raised during two successive + generations from spontaneously self-fertilised seeds produced by plants + under a net; and as the variety is highly self-fertile, its progenitors in + Edinburgh may have been self-fertilised during some previous generations. + Several flowers on two of my plants were legitimately crossed with pollen + from a short-styled common cowslip growing almost wild in my orchard; so + that the cross was between plants which had been subjected to considerably + different conditions. Several other flowers on the same two plants were + allowed to fertilise themselves under a net; and this union, as already + explained, is a legitimate one. + </p> + <p> + The crossed and self-fertilised seeds thus obtained were sown thickly on + the opposite sides of three pots, and the seedlings thinned, so that an + equal number were left on the two sides. The seedlings during the first + year were nearly equal in height, excepting in Pot 3, Table 6/94, in which + the self-fertilised plants had a decided advantage. In the autumn the + plants were bedded out, in their pots; owing to this circumstance, and to + many plants growing in each pot, they did not flourish, and none were very + productive in seeds. But the conditions were perfectly equal and fair for + both sides. In the following spring I record in my notes that in two of + the pots the crossed plants are “incomparably the finest in general + appearance,” and in all three pots they flowered before the + self-fertilised. When in full flower the tallest flower-stem on each side + of each pot was measured, and the number of the flower-stems on both sides + counted, as shown in Table 6/94. The plants were left uncovered, and as + other plants were growing close by, the flowers no doubt were crossed by + insects. When the capsules were ripe they were gathered and counted, and + the result is likewise shown in Table 6/94. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/94. Primula veris (equal-styled, red-flowered variety). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Height of tallest flower-stem: crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Number of Flower-stems: crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Number of good capsules: crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 5: Height of tallest flower-stem: self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 6: Number of Flower-stems: self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 7: Number of good capsules: self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 10 : 14 : 163 : 6 4/8 : 6 : 6. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Pot 2 : 8 4/8 : 12 : * : 5 : 2 : 0. + *Several, not counted. +</pre> + <p> + Pot 3 : 7 4/8 : 7 : 43 : 10 4/8 : 5 : 26. + </p> + <p> + Totals : 26.0 : 33 : 206 : 22.0 : 13 : 32. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the three tallest flower-stems on the crossed plants + is 8.66 inches, and that of the three on the self-fertilised plants 7.33 + inches; or as 100 to 85. + </p> + <p> + All the crossed plants together produced thirty-three flower-stems, whilst + the self-fertilised bore only thirteen. The number of the capsules were + counted only on the plants in Pots 1 and 3, for the self-fertilised plants + in Pot 2 produced none; therefore those on the crossed plants on the + opposite side were not counted. Capsules not containing any good seeds + were rejected. The crossed plants in the above two pots produced 206, and + the self-fertilised in the same pots only 32 capsules; or as 100 to 15. + Judging from the previous generations, the extreme unproductiveness of the + self-fertilised plants in this experiment was wholly due to their having + been subjected to unfavourable conditions, and to severe competition with + the crossed plants; for had they grown separately in good soil, it is + almost certain that they would have produced a large number of capsules. + The seeds were counted in twenty capsules from the crossed plants, and + they averaged 24.75; whilst in twenty capsules from the self-fertilised + plants the average was 17.65; or as 100 to 71. Moreover, the seeds from + the self-fertilised plants were not nearly so fine as those from the + crossed plants. If we consider together the number of capsules produced + and the average number of contained seeds, the fertility of the crossed + plants to the self-fertilised plants was as 100 to 11. We thus see what a + great effect, as far as fertility is concerned, was produced by a cross + between the two varieties, which had been long exposed to different + conditions, in comparison with self-fertilisation; the fertilisation + having been in both cases of the legitimate order. + </p> + <p> + Primula sinensis. + </p> + <p> + As the Chinese primrose is a heterostyled or dimorphic plant, like the + common cowslip, it might have been expected that the flowers of both forms + when illegitimately fertilised with their own pollen or with that from + flowers on another plant of the same form, would have yielded less seed + than the legitimately crossed flowers; and that the seedlings raised from + illegitimately self-fertilised seeds would have been somewhat dwarfed and + less fertile, in comparison with the seedlings from legitimately crossed + seeds. This holds good in relation to the fertility of the flowers; but to + my surprise there was no difference in growth between the offspring from a + legitimate union between two distinct plants, and from an illegitimate + union whether between the flowers on the same plant, or between distinct + plants of the same form. But I have shown, in the paper before referred + to, that in England this plant is in an abnormal condition, such as, + judging from analogous cases, would tend to render a cross between two + individuals of no benefit to the offspring. Our plants have been commonly + raised from self-fertilised seeds; and the seedlings have generally been + subjected to nearly uniform conditions in pots in greenhouses. Moreover, + many of the plants are now varying and changing their character, so as to + become in a greater or less degree equal-styled, and in consequence highly + self-fertile. From the analogy of Primula veris there can hardly be a + doubt that if a plant of Primula sinensis could have been procured direct + from China, and if it had been crossed with one of our English varieties, + the offspring would have shown wonderful superiority in height and + fertility (though probably not in the beauty of their flowers) over our + ordinary plants. + </p> + <p> + My first experiment consisted in fertilising many flowers on long-styled + and short-styled plants with their own pollen, and other flowers on the + same plants with pollen taken from distinct plants belonging to the same + form; so that all the unions were illegitimate. There was no uniform and + marked difference in the number of seeds obtained from these two modes of + self-fertilisation, both of which were illegitimate. The two lots of seeds + from both forms were sown thickly on opposite sides of four pots, and + numerous plants thus raised. But there was no difference in their growth, + excepting in one pot, in which the offspring from the illegitimate union + of two long-styled plants exceeded in a decided manner in height the + offspring of flowers on the same plants fertilised with their own pollen. + But in all four pots the plants raised from the union of distinct plants + belonging to the same form, flowered before the offspring from the + self-fertilised flowers. + </p> + <p> + Some long-styled and short-styled plants were now raised from purchased + seeds, and flowers on both forms were legitimately crossed with pollen + from a distinct plant; and other flowers on both forms were illegitimately + fertilised with pollen from the flowers on the same plant. The seeds were + sown on opposite sides of Pots 1 to 4 in Table 6/95; a single plant being + left on each side. Several flowers on the illegitimate long-styled and + short-styled plants described in the last paragraph, were also + legitimately and illegitimately fertilised in the manner just described, + and their seeds were sown in Pots 5 to 8 in the same table. As the two + sets of seedlings did not differ in any essential manner, their + measurements are given in a single table. I should add that the legitimate + unions in both cases yielded, as might have been expected, many more seeds + than the illegitimate unions. The seedlings whilst half-grown presented no + difference in height on the two sides of the several pots. When fully + grown they were measured to the tips of their longest leaves, and the + result is given in Table 6/95. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/95. Primula sinensis. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants from legitimately Crossed seeds. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Plants from illegitimately Self-fertilised seeds. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 8 2/8 : 8. From short-styled mother. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 7 4/8 : 8 5/8. From short-styled mother. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 9 5/8 : 9 3/8. From long-styled mother. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 8 4/8 : 8 2/8. From long-styled mother. + </p> + <p> + Pot 5 : 9 3/8 : 9. From illegitimate short-styled mother. + </p> + <p> + Pot 6 : 9 7/8 : 9 4/8. From illegitimate short-styled mother. + </p> + <p> + Pot 7 : 8 4/8 : 9 4/8. From illegitimate long-styled mother. + </p> + <p> + Pot 8 : 10 4/8 : 10. From illegitimate long-styled mother. + </p> + <p> + Total : 72.13 : 72.25. + </p> + <p> + In six out of the eight pots the legitimately crossed plants exceeded in + height by a trifle the illegitimately self-fertilised plants; but the + latter exceeded the former in two of the pots in a more strongly marked + manner. The average height of the eight legitimately crossed plants is + 9.01, and that of the eight illegitimately self-fertilised 9.03 inches, or + as 100 to 100.2. The plants on the opposite sides produced, as far as + could be judged by the eye, an equal number of flowers. I did not count + the capsules or the seeds produced by them; but undoubtedly, judging from + many previous observations, the plants derived from the legitimately + crossed seeds would have been considerably more fertile than those from + the illegitimately self-fertilised seeds. The crossed plants, as in the + previous case, flowered before the self-fertilised plants in all the pots + except in Pot 2, in which the two sides flowered simultaneously; and this + early flowering may, perhaps, be considered as an advantage. + </p> + <p> + 27. POLYGONEAE.—Fagopyrum esculentum. + </p> + <p> + This plant was discovered by Hildebrand to be heterostyled, that is, to + present, like the species of Primula, a long-styled and a short-styled + form, which are adapted for reciprocal fertilisation. Therefore the + following comparison of the growth of the crossed and self-fertilised + seedlings is not fair, for we do not know whether the difference in their + heights may not be wholly due to the illegitimate fertilisation of the + self-fertilised flowers. + </p> + <p> + I obtained seeds by legitimately crossing flowers on long-styled and + short-styled plants, and by fertilising other flowers on both forms with + pollen from the same plant. Rather more seeds were obtained by the former + than by the latter process; and the legitimately crossed seeds were + heavier than an equal number of the illegitimately self-fertilised seeds, + in the ratio of 100 to 82. Crossed and self-fertilised seeds from the + short-styled parents, after germinating on sand, were planted in pairs on + the opposite sides of a large pot; and two similar lots of seeds from + long-styled parents were planted in a like manner on the opposite sides of + two other pots. In all three pots the legitimately crossed seedlings, when + a few inches in height, were taller than the self-fertilised; and in all + three pots they flowered before them by one or two days. When fully grown + they were all cut down close to the ground, and as I was pressed for time, + they were placed in a long row, the cut end of one plant touching the tip + of another, and the total length of the legitimately crossed plants was 47 + feet 7 inches, and of the illegitimately self-fertilised plants 32 feet 8 + inches. Therefore the average height of the fifteen crossed plants in all + three pots was 38.06 inches, and that of the fifteen self-fertilised + plants 26.13 inches; or as 100 to 69. + </p> + <p> + 28. CHENOPODIACEAE.—Beta vulgaris. + </p> + <p> + A single plant, no others growing in the same garden, was left to + fertilise itself, and the self-fertilised seeds were collected. Seeds were + also collected from a plant growing in the midst of a large bed in another + garden; and as the incoherent pollen is abundant, the seeds of this plant + will almost certainly have been the product of a crossed between distinct + plants by means of the wind. Some of the two lots of seeds were sown on + the opposite sides of two very large pots; and the young seedlings were + thinned, so that an equal but considerable number was left on the two + sides. These plants were thus subjected to very severe competition, as + well as to poor conditions. The remaining seeds were sown out of doors in + good soil in two long and not closely adjoining rows, so that these + seedlings were placed under favourable conditions, and were not subjected + to any mutual competition. The self-fertilised seeds in the open ground + came up very badly; and on removing the soil in two or three places, it + was found that many had sprouted under ground and had then died. No such + case had been observed before. Owing to the large number of seedlings + which thus perished, the surviving self-fertilised plants grew thinly in + the row, and thus had an advantage over the crossed plants, which grew + very thickly in the other row. The young plants in the two rows were + protected by a little straw during the winter, and those in the two large + pots were placed in the greenhouse. + </p> + <p> + There was no difference between the two lots in the pots until the ensuing + spring, when they had grown a little, and then some of the crossed plants + were finer and taller than any of the self-fertilised. When in full flower + their stems were measured, and the measurements are given in Table 6/96. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/96. Beta vulgaris. + </p> + <p> + Heights of flower stems measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 34 6/8 : 36. Pot 1 : 30 : 20 1/8. Pot 1 : 33 6/8 : 32 2/8. Pot 1 : + 34 4/8 : 32. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 42 3/8 : 42 1/8. Pot 2 : 33 1/8 : 26 4/8. Pot 2 : 31 2/8 : 29 2/8. + Pot 2 : 33 : 20 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 272.75 : 238.50. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the eight crossed plants is here 34.09, and that of + the eight self-fertilised plants 29.81; or as 100 to 87. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the plants in the open ground, each long row was divided + into half, so as to diminish the chance of any accidental advantage in one + part of either row; and the four tallest plants in the two halves of the + two rows were carefully selected and measured. The eight tallest crossed + plants averaged 30.92, and the eight tallest self-fertilised 30.7 inches + in height, or as 100 to 99; so that they were practically equal. But we + should bear in mind that the trial was not quite fair, as the + self-fertilised plants had a great advantage over the crossed in being + much less crowded in their own row, owing to the large number of seeds + which had perished under ground after sprouting. Nor were the lots in the + two rows subjected to any mutual competition. + </p> + <p> + 29. CANNACEAE.—Canna warscewiczi. + </p> + <p> + In most or all the species belonging to this genus, the pollen is shed + before the flower expands, and adheres in a mass to the foliaceous pistil + close beneath the stigmatic surface. As the edge of this mass generally + touches the edge of the stigma, and as it was ascertained by trials + purposely made that a very few pollen-grains suffice for fertilisation, + the present species and probably all the others of the genus are highly + self-fertile. Exceptions occasionally occur in which, from the stamen + being slightly shorter than usual, the pollen is deposited a little + beneath the stigmatic surface, and such flowers drop off unimpregnated + unless they are artificially fertilised. Sometimes, though rarely, the + stamen is a little longer than usual, and then the whole stigmatic surface + gets thickly covered with pollen. As some pollen is generally deposited in + contact with the edge of the stigma, certain authors have concluded that + the flowers are invariably self-fertilised. This is an extraordinary + conclusion, for it implies that a great amount of pollen is produced for + no purpose. On this view, also, the large size of the stigmatic surface is + an unintelligible feature in the structure of the flower, as well as the + relative position of all the parts, which is such that when insects visit + the flowers to suck the copious nectar, they cannot fail to carry pollen + from one flower to another. (6/7. Delpino has described ‘Bot. Zeitung’ + 1867 page 277 and ‘Scientific Opinion’ 1870 page 135, the structure of the + flowers in this genus, but he was mistaken in thinking that + self-fertilisation is impossible, at least in the case of the present + species. Dr. Dickie and Professor Faivre state that the flowers are + fertilised in the bud, and that self-fertilisation is inevitable. I + presume that they were misled by the pollen being deposited at a very + early period on the pistil: see ‘Journal of Linnean Society Botany’ volume + 10 page 55 and ‘Variabilité des Espèces’ 1868 page 158.) + </p> + <p> + According to Delpino, bees eagerly visit the flowers in North Italy, but I + have never seen any insect visiting the flowers of the present species in + my hothouse, although many plants grew there during several years. + Nevertheless these plants produced plenty of seed, as they likewise did + when covered by a net; they are therefore fully capable of + self-fertilisation, and have probably been self-fertilised in this country + for many generations. As they are cultivated in pots, and are not exposed + to competition with surrounding plants, they have also been subjected for + a considerable time to somewhat uniform conditions. This, therefore, is a + case exactly parallel with that of the common pea, in which we have no + right to expect much or any good from intercrossing plants thus descended + and thus treated; and no good did follow, excepting that the + cross-fertilised flowers yielded rather more seeds than the + self-fertilised. This species was one of the earlier ones on which I + experimented, and as I had not then raised any self-fertilised plants for + several successive generations under uniform conditions, I did not know or + even suspect that such treatment would interfere with the advantages to be + gained from a cross. I was therefore much surprised at the crossed plants + not growing more vigorously than the self-fertilised, and a large number + of plants were raised, notwithstanding that the present species is an + extremely troublesome one to experiment on. The seeds, even those which + have been long soaked in water, will not germinate well on bare sand; and + those that were sown in pots (which plan I was forced to follow) + germinated at very unequal intervals of time; so that it was difficult to + get pairs of the same exact age, and many seedlings had to be pulled up + and thrown away. My experiments were continued during three successive + generations; and in each generation the self-fertilised plants were again + self-fertilised, their early progenitors in this country having probably + been self-fertilised for many previous generations. In each generation, + also, the crossed plants were fertilised with pollen from another crossed + plant. + </p> + <p> + Of the flowers which were crossed in the three generations, taken + together, a rather larger proportion yielded capsules than did those which + were self-fertilised. The seeds were counted in forty-seven capsules from + the crossed flowers, and they contained on an average 9.95 seeds; whereas + forty-eight capsules from the self-fertilised flowers contained on an + average 8.45 seeds; or as 100 to 85. The seeds from the crossed flowers + were not heavier, on the contrary a little lighter, than those from the + self-fertilised flowers, as was thrice ascertained. On one occasion I + weighed 200 of the crossed and 106 of the self-fertilised seeds, and the + relative weight of an equal number was as 100 for the crossed to 101.5 for + the self-fertilised. With other plants, when the seeds from the + self-fertilised flowers were heavier than those from the crossed flowers, + this appeared to be due generally to fewer having been produced by the + self-fertilised flowers, and to their having been in consequence better + nourished. But in the present instance the seeds from the crossed capsules + were separated into two lots,—namely, those from the capsules + containing over fourteen seeds, and those from the capsules containing + under fourteen seeds, and the seeds from the more productive capsules were + the heavier of the two; so that the above explanation here fails. + </p> + <p> + As pollen is deposited at a very early age on the pistil, generally in + contact with the stigma, some flowers whilst still in bud were castrated + for my first experiment, and were afterwards fertilised with pollen from a + distinct plant. Other flowers were fertilised with their own pollen. From + the seeds thus obtained, I succeeded in rearing only three pairs of plants + of equal age. The three crossed plants averaged 32.79 inches, and the + three self-fertilised 32.08 inches in height; so that they were nearly + equal, the crossed having a slight advantage. As the same result followed + in all three generations, it would be superfluous to give the heights of + all the plants, and I will give only the averages. + </p> + <p> + In order to raise crossed and self-fertilised plants of the second + generation, some flowers on the above crossed plants were crossed within + twenty-four hours after they had expanded with pollen from a distinct + plant; and this interval would probably not be too great to allow of + cross-fertilisation being effectual. Some flowers on the self-fertilised + plants of the last generation were also self-fertilised. From these two + lots of seeds, ten crossed and twelve self-fertilised plants of equal ages + were raised; and these were measured when fully grown. The crossed + averaged 36.98, and the self-fertilised averaged 37.42 inches in height; + so that here again the two lots were nearly equal; but the self-fertilised + had a slight advantage. + </p> + <p> + In order to raise plants of the third generation, a better plan was + followed, and flowers on the crossed plants of the second generation were + selected in which the stamens were too short to reach the stigmas, so that + they could not possibly have been self-fertilised. These flowers were + crossed with pollen from a distinct plant. Flowers on the self-fertilised + plants of the second generation were again self-fertilised. From the two + lots of seeds thus obtained, twenty-one crossed and nineteen + self-fertilised plants of equal age, and forming the third generation, + were raised in fourteen large pots. They were measured when fully grown, + and by an odd chance the average height of the two lots was exactly the + same, namely, 35.96 inches; so that neither side had the least advantage + over the other. To test this result, all the plants on both sides in ten + out of the above fourteen pots were cut down after they had flowered, and + in the ensuing year the stems were again measured; and now the crossed + plants exceeded by a little (namely, 1.7 inches) the self-fertilised. They + were again cut down, and on their flowering for the third time, the + self-fertilised plants had a slight advantage (namely, 1.54 inches) over + the crossed. Hence the result arrived at with these plants during the + previous trials was confirmed, namely, that neither lot had any decided + advantage over the other. It may, however, be worth mentioning that the + self-fertilised plants showed some tendency to flower before the crossed + plants: this occurred with all three pairs of the first generation; and + with the cut down plants of the third generation, a self-fertilised plant + flowered first in nine out of the twelve pots, whilst in the remaining + three pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + If we consider all the plants of the three generations taken together, the + thirty-four crossed plants average 35.98, and the thirty-four + self-fertilised plants 36.39 inches in height; or as 100 to 101. We may + therefore conclude that the two lots possessed equal powers of growth; and + this I believe to be the result of long-continued self-fertilisation, + together with exposure to similar conditions in each generation, so that + all the individuals had acquired a closely similar constitution. + </p> + <p> + 30. GRAMINACEAE.—Zea mays. + </p> + <p> + This plant is monoecious, and was selected for trial on this account, no + other such plant having been experimented on. (6/8. Hildebrand remarks + that this species seems at first sight adapted to be fertilised by pollen + from the same plant, owing to the male flowers standing above the female + flowers; but practically it must generally be fertilised by pollen from + another plant, as the male flowers usually shed their pollen before the + female flowers are mature: ‘Monatsbericht der K. Akad.’ Berlin October + 1872 page 743.) It is also anemophilous, or is fertilised by the wind; and + of such plants only the common beet had been tried. Some plants were + raised in the greenhouse, and were crossed with pollen taken from a + distinct plant; and a single plant, growing quite separately in a + different part of the house, was allowed to fertilise itself + spontaneously. The seeds thus obtained were placed on damp sand, and as + they germinated in pairs of equal age were planted on the opposite sides + of four very large pots; nevertheless they were considerably crowded. The + pots were kept in the hothouse. The plants were first measured to the tips + of their leaves when only between 1 and 2 feet in height, as shown in + Table 6/97. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/97. Zea mays. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 23 4/8 : 17 3/8. Pot 1 : 12 : 20 3/8. Pot 1 : 21 : 20. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 22 : 20. Pot 2 : 19 1/8 : 18 3/8. Pot 2 : 21 4/8 : 18 5/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 22 1/8 : 18 5/8. Pot 3 : 20 3/8 : 15 2/8. Pot 3 : 18 2/8 : 16 4/8. + Pot 3 : 21 5/8 : 18. Pot 3 : 23 2/8 : 16 2/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 21 : 18. Pot 4 : 22 1/8 : 12 6/8. Pot 4 : 23 : 15 4/8. Pot 4 : 12 + : 18. + </p> + <p> + Total : 302.88 : 263.63. + </p> + <p> + The fifteen crossed plants here average 20.19, and the fifteen + self-fertilised plants 17.57 inches in height; or as 100 to 87. Mr. Galton + made a graphical representation, in accordance with the method described + in the introductory chapter, of the above measurements, and adds the words + “very good” to the curves thus formed. + </p> + <p> + Shortly afterwards one of the crossed plants in Pot 1 died; another became + much diseased and stunted; and the third never grew to its full height. + They seemed to have been all injured, probably by some larva gnawing their + roots. Therefore all the plants on both sides of this pot were rejected in + the subsequent measurements. When the plants were fully grown they were + again measured to the tips of the highest leaves, and the eleven crossed + plants now averaged 68.1, and the eleven self-fertilised plants 62.34 + inches in height; or as 100 to 91. In all four pots a crossed plant + flowered before any one of the self-fertilised; but three of the plants + did not flower at all. Those that flowered were also measured to the + summits of the male flowers: the ten crossed plants averaged 66.51, and + the nine self-fertilised plants 61.59 inches in height; or as 100 to 93. + </p> + <p> + A large number of the same crossed and self-fertilised seeds were sown in + the middle of the summer in the open ground in two long rows. Very much + fewer of the self-fertilised than of the crossed plants produced flowers; + but those that did flower, flowered almost simultaneously. When fully + grown the ten tallest plants in each row were selected and measured to the + tips of their highest leaves, as well as to the summits of their male + flowers. The crossed averaged to the tips of their leaves 54 inches in + height, and the self-fertilised 44.65, or as 100 to 83; and to the summits + of their male flowers, 53.96 and 43.45 inches; or as 100 to 80. + </p> + <p> + Phalaris canariensis. + </p> + <p> + Hildebrand has shown in the paper referred to under the last species, that + this hermaphrodite grass is better adapted for cross-fertilisation than + for self-fertilisation. Several plants were raised in the greenhouse close + together, and their flowers were mutually intercrossed. Pollen from a + single plant growing quite separately was collected and placed on the + stigmas of the same plant. The seeds thus produced were self-fertilised, + for they were fertilised with pollen from the same plant, but it will have + been a mere chance whether with pollen from the same flowers. Both lots of + seeds, after germinating on sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite + sides of four pots, which were kept in the greenhouse. When the plants + were a little over a foot in height they were measured, and the crossed + plants averaged 13.38, and the self-fertilised 12.29 inches in height; or + as 100 to 92. + </p> + <p> + When in full flower they were again measured to the extremities of their + culms, as shown in Table 6/98. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/98. Phalaris canariensis. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Pot 1 : 42 2/8 : 41 2/8. Pot 1 : 39 6/8 : 45 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 2 : 37 : 31 6/8. Pot 2 : 49 4/8 : 37 2/8. Pot 4 : 29 : 42 3/8. Pot 2 : + 37 : 34 7/8. + </p> + <p> + Pot 3 : 37 6/8 : 28. Pot 3 : 35 4/8 : 28. Pot 3 : 43 : 34. + </p> + <p> + Pot 4 : 40 2/8 : 35 1/8. Pot 4 : 37 : 34 4/8. + </p> + <p> + Total : 428.00 : 392.63. + </p> + <p> + The eleven crossed plants now averaged 38.9, and the eleven + self-fertilised plants 35.69 inches in height; or as 100 to 92, which is + the same ratio as before. Differently to what occurred with the maize, the + crossed plants did not flower before the self-fertilised; and though both + lots flowered very poorly from having been kept in pots in the greenhouse, + yet the self-fertilised plants produced twenty-eight flower-heads, whilst + the crossed produced only twenty! + </p> + <p> + Two long rows of the same seeds were sown out of doors, and care was taken + that they were sown in nearly equal number; but a far greater number of + the crossed than of the self-fertilised seeds yielded plants. The + self-fertilised plants were in consequence not so much crowded as the + crossed, and thus had an advantage over them. When in full flower, the + twelve tallest plants were carefully selected from both rows and measured, + as shown in Table 6/99. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 6/99. Phalaris canariensis (growing in the open ground). + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Crossed Plants, twelve tallest. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants, twelve tallest. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + 34 1/8 : 35 2/8. + 35 7/8 : 31 1/8. + 36 : 33. + 35 5/8 : 32. + 35 5/8 : 31 5/8. + 36 1/8 : 36. + 36 6/8 : 33. + 38 6/8 : 32. + 36 2/8 : 35 1/8. + 35 5/8 : 33 5/8. + 34 1/8 : 34 2/8. + 34 5/8 : 35. +</pre> + <p> + Total : 429.5 : 402.0. + </p> + <p> + The twelve crossed plants here average 35.78, and the twelve + self-fertilised 33.5 inches in height; or as 100 to 93. In this case the + crossed plants flowered rather before the self-fertilised, and thus + differed from those growing in the pots.] + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0007" id="link2HCH0007"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER VII. A SUMMARY OF THE HEIGHTS AND WEIGHTS OF THE CROSSED AND + SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Number of species and plants measured. + Tables given. + Preliminary remarks on the offspring of plants crossed by a fresh stock. + Thirteen cases specially considered. + The effects of crossing a self-fertilised plant either by another + self-fertilised plant or by an intercrossed plant of the old stock. + Summary of the results. + Preliminary remarks on the crossed and self-fertilised plants of the + same stock. + The twenty-six exceptional cases considered, in which the crossed plants + did not exceed greatly in height the self-fertilised. + Most of these cases shown not to be real exceptions to the rule that + cross-fertilisation is beneficial. + Summary of results. + Relative weights of the crossed and self-fertilised plants. +</pre> + <p> + The details which have been given under the head of each species are so + numerous and so intricate, that it is necessary to tabulate the results. + In Table 7/A, the number of plants of each kind which were raised from a + cross between two individuals of the same stock and from self-fertilised + seeds, together with their mean or average heights, are given. In the + right hand column, the mean height of the crossed to that of the + self-fertilised plants, the former being taken as 100, is shown. To make + this clear, it may be advisable to give an example. In the first + generation of Ipomoea, six plants derived from a cross between two plants + were measured, and their mean height is 86.00 inches; six plants derived + from flowers on the same parent-plant fertilised with their own pollen + were measured, and their mean height is 65.66 inches. From this it + follows, as shown in the right hand column, that if the mean height of the + crossed plants be taken as 100, that of the self-fertilised plants is 76. + The same plan is followed with all the other species. + </p> + <p> + The crossed and self-fertilised plants were generally grown in pots in + competition with one another, and always under as closely similar + conditions as could be attained. They were, however, sometimes grown in + separate rows in the open ground. With several of the species, the crossed + plants were again crossed, and the self-fertilised plants again + self-fertilised, and thus successive generations were raised and measured, + as may be seen in Table 7/A. Owing to this manner of proceeding, the + crossed plants became in the later generations more or less closely + inter-related. + </p> + <p> + In Table 7/B the relative weights of the crossed and self-fertilised + plants, after they had flowered and had been cut down, are given in the + few cases in which they were ascertained. The results are, I think, more + striking and of greater value as evidence of constitutional vigour than + those deduced from the relative heights of the plants. + </p> + <p> + The most important table is Table 7/C, as it includes the relative + heights, weights, and fertility of plants raised from parents crossed by a + fresh stock (that is, by non-related plants grown under different + conditions), or by a distinct sub-variety, in comparison with + self-fertilised plants, or in a few cases with plants of the same old + stock intercrossed during several generations. The relative fertility of + the plants in this and the other tables will be more fully considered in a + future chapter. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 7/A. Relative heights of plants from parents crossed with pollen + from other plants of the same stock, and self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Heights of plants measured in inches. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Name of Plant. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Number of Crossed Plants measured. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Average Height of Crossed Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Number of Self-fertilised Plants measured. + </p> + <p> + Column 5: Average Height of Self-fertilised Plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 6: x, where the ratio of the Average Height of the Crossed to the + Self-fertilised Plants is expressed as 100 to x. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—first generation: + 6 : 86.00 : 6 : 65.66 : 76. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—second generation: + 6 : 84.16 : 6 : 66.33 : 79. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—third generation: + 6 : 77.41 : 6 : 52.83 : 68. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—fourth generation: + 7 : 69.78 : 7 : 60.14 : 86. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—fifth generation: + 6 : 82.54 : 6 : 62.33 : 75. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—sixth generation: + 6 : 87.50 : 6 : 63.16 : 72. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—seventh generation: + 9 : 83.94 : 9 : 68.25 : 81. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—eighth generation: + 8 : 113.25 : 8 : 96.65 : 85. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—ninth generation: + 14 : 81.39 : 14 : 64.07 : 79. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—tenth generation: + 5 : 93.70 : 5 : 50.40 : 54. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—Number and average height of all the plants of the ten +generations: + 73 : 85.84 : 73 : 66.02 : 77. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Mimulus luteus—three first generations, before the new and taller +self-fertilised variety appeared: + 10 : 8.19 : 10 : 5.29 : 65. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Digitalis purpurea: + 16 : 51.33 : 8 : 35.87 : 70. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Calceolaria—(common greenhouse variety): + 1 : 19.50 : 1 : 15.00 : 77. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Linaria vulgaris: + 3 : 7.08 : 3 : 5.75 : 81. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Verbascum thapsus: + 6 : 65.34 : 6 : 56.50 : 86. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Vandellia nummularifolia—crossed and self-fertilised plants, raised +from perfect flowers: + 20 : 4.30 : 20 : 4.27 : 99. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Vandellia nummularifolia—crossed and self-fertilised plants, raised +from perfect flowers: second trial, plants crowded: + 24 : 3.60 : 24 : 3.38 : 94. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Vandellia nummularifolia—crossed plants raised from perfect flowers, +and self-fertilised plants from cleistogene flowers: + 20 : 4.30 : 20 : 4.06 : 94. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Gesneria pendulina: + 8 : 32.06 : 8 : 29.14 : 90. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Salvia coccinea: + 6 : 27.85 : 6 : 21.16 : 76. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Origanum vulgare: + 4 : 20.00 : 4 : 17.12 : 86. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Thunbergia alata: + 6 : 60.00 : 6 : 65.00 : 108. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Brassica oleracea: + 9 : 41.08 : 9 : 39.00 : 95. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Iberis umbellata—the self-fertilised plants of the third generation: + 7 : 19.12 : 7 : 16.39 : 86. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Papaver vagum: + 15 : 21.91 : 15 : 19.54 : 89. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—English stock, first generation: + 4 : 29.68 : 4 : 25.56 : 86. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—English stock, second generation: + 11 : 32.47 : 11 : 32.81 : 101. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—Brazilian stock, first generation: + 14 : 44.64 : 14 : 45.12 : 101. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—Brazilian stock, second generation: + 18 : 43.38 : 19 : 50.30 : 116. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—average height and number of all the plants +of Eschscholtzia: + 47 : 40.03 : 48 : 42.72 : 107. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda lutea—grown in pots: + 24 : 17.17 : 24 : 14.61 : 85. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda lutea—grown in open ground : + 8 : 28.09 : 8 : 23.14 : 82. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda odorata—self-fertilised seeds from a highly self-fertile plant, +grown in pots: + 19 : 27.48 : 19 : 22.55 : 82. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda odorata—self-fertilised seeds from a highly self-fertile plant, +grown in open ground: + 8 : 25.76 : 8 : 27.09 : 105. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda odorata—self-fertilised seeds from a semi-self-fertile plant, +grown in pots: + 20 : 29.98 : 20 : 27.71 : 92. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda odorata—self-fertilised seeds from a semi-self-fertile plant, +grown in open ground: + 8 : 25.92 : 8 : 23.54 : 90. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Viola tricolor: + 14 : 5.58 : 14 : 2.37 : 42. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Adonis aestivalis: + 4 : 14.25 : 4 : 14.31 : 100. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Delphinium consolida: + 6 : 14.95 : 6 : 12.50 : 84. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Viscaria oculata: + 15 : 34.50 : 15 : 33.55 : 97. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—open ground, about : + 6?: 28? : 6?: 24? : 86. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—second generation, in pots, crowded: + 2 : 16.75 : 2 : 9.75 : 58. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—third generation, in pots: + 8 : 28.39 : 8 : 28.21 : 99. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—offspring from plants of the third +self-fertilised generation crossed by intercrossed plants of the third +generation, compared with plants of fourth self-fertilised generation: + 15 : 28.00 : 10 : 26.55 : 95. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—number and average height of all the plants of +Dianthus: + 31 : 27.37 : 26 : 25.18 : 92. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Hibiscus africanus: + 4 : 13.25 : 4 : 14.43 : 109. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Pelargonium zonale: + 7 : 22.35 : 7 : 16.62 : 74. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Tropaeolum minus: + 8 : 58.43 : 8 : 46.00 : 79. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Limnanthes douglasii: + 16 : 17.46 : 16 : 13.85 : 79. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lupinus luteus—second generation: + 8 : 30.78 : 8 : 25.21 : 82. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lupinus pilosus—plants of two generations: + 2 : 35.50 : 3 : 30.50 : 86. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Phaseolus multiflorus: + 5 : 86.00 : 5 : 82.35 : 96. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Pisum sativum: + 4 : 34.62 : 4 : 39.68 : 115. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Sarothamnus scoparius—small seedlings: + 6 : 2.91 : 6 : 1.33 : 46. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Sarothamnus scoparius—the three survivors on each side after three +years’ growth: + : 18.91 : : 11.83 : 63. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ononis minutissima: + 2 : 19.81 : 2 : 17.37 : 88. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Clarkia elegans: + 4 : 33.50 : 4 : 27.62 : 82. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Bartonia aurea: + 8 : 24.62 : 8 : 26.31 : 107. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Passiflora gracilis: + 2 : 49.00 : 2 : 51.00 : 104. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Apium petroselinum: + * : : * : : 100. +*not measured. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Scabiosa atro-purpurea: + 4 : 17.12 : 4 : 15.37 : 90. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lactuca sativa—plants of two generations: + 7 : 19.43 : 6 : 16.00 : 82. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Specularia speculum: + 4 : 19.28 : 4 : 18.93 : 98. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lobelia ramosa—first generation: + 4 : 22.25 : 4 : 18.37 : 82. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lobelia ramosa—second generation: + 3 : 23.33 : 3 : 19.00 : 81. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lobelia fulgens—first generation: + 2 : 34.75 : 2 : 44.25 : 127. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lobelia fulgens—second generation: + 23 : 29.82 : 23 : 27.10 : 91. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nemophila insignis—half-grown: + 12 : 11.10 : 12 : 5.45 : 49. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nemophila insignis—the same fully-grown: + : 33.28 : : 19.90 : 60. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Borago officinalis: + 4 : 20.68 : 4 : 21.18 : 102. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nolana prostrata: + 5 : 12.75 : 5 : 13.40 : 105. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—first generation: + 5 : 30.80 : 5 : 26.00 : 84. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—second generation: + 4 : 40.50 : 6 : 26.25 : 65. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—third generation: + 8 : 40.96 : 8 : 53.87 : 131. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—fourth generation: + 15 : 46.79 : 14 : 32.39 : 69. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—fourth generation, from a distinct parent: + 13 : 44.74 : 13 : 26.87 : 60. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—fifth generation: + 22 : 54.11 : 21 : 33.23 : 61. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—fifth generation, in open ground: + 10 : 38.27 : 10 : 23.31 : 61. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—Number and average height of all the plants in pots of +Petunia: + 67 : 46.53 : 67 : 33.12 : 71. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—first generation: + 4 : 18.50 : 4 : 32.75 : 178. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—second generation: + 9 : 53.84 : 7 : 51.78 : 96. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—third generation: + 7 : 95.25 : 7 : 79.60 : 83. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—third generation but raised from a distinct plant: + 7 : 70.78 : 9 : 71.30 : 101. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—Number and average height of all the plants of +Nicotiana: + 27 : 63.73 : 27 : 61.31 : 96. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Cyclamen persicum: + 8 : 9.49 : 8?: 7.50 : 79. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Anagallis collina: + 6 : 42.20 : 6 : 33.35 : 69. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Primula sinensis—a dimorphic species: + 8 : 9.01 : 8 : 9.03 : 100. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Fagopyrum esculentum—a dimorphic species: + 15 : 38.06 : 15 : 26.13 : 69. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Beta vulgaris—in pots: + 8 : 34.09 : 8 : 29.81 : 87. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Beta vulgaris—in open ground: + 8 : 30.92 : 8 : 30.70 : 99. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Canna warscewiczi—plants of three generations: + 34 : 35.98 : 34 : 36.39 : 101. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Zea mays—in pots, whilst young, measured to tips of leaves: + 15 : 20.19 : 15 : 17.57 : 87. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Zea mays—when full-grown, after the death of some, measured to tips of +leaves: + : 68.10 : : 62.34 : 91. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Zea mays—when full-grown, after the death of some, measured to tips of +flowers: + : 66.51 : : 61.59 : 93. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Zea mays—grown in open ground, measured to tips of leaves: + 10 : 54.00 : 10 : 44.55 : 83. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Zea mays—grown in open ground, measured to tips of flowers: + : 53.96 : : 43.45 : 80. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Phalaris canariensis—in pots. + 11 : 38.90 : 11 : 35.69 : 92. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Phalaris canariensis—in open ground: + 12 : 35.78 : 12 : 33.50 : 93. +</pre> + <p> + TABLE 7/B.—Relative weights of plants from parents crossed with + pollen from distinct plants of the same stock, and self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Names of plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Number of crossed plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Number of self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: x, where the ratio of the Weight of the Crossed to the + Self-fertilised Plants is expressed as 100 to x. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—plants of the tenth generation: + 6 : 6 : 44. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Vandellia nummularifolia—first generation: + 41 : 41 : 97. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Brassica oleracea—first generation: + 9 : 9 : 37. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—plants of the second generation: + 19 : 19 : 118. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda lutea—first generation, grown in pots: + 24 : 24 : 21. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda lutea—first generation, grown in open ground: + 8 : 8 : 40. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda odorata—first generation, descended from a highly self-fertile +plant, grown in pots: + 19 : 19 : 67. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Reseda odorata—first generation, descended from a semi-self-fertile +plant, grown in pots: + 20 : 20 : 99. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—plants of the third generation: + 8 : 8 : 49. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—plants of the fifth generation, in pots: + 22 : 21 : 22. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—plants of the fifth generation, in open ground: + 10 : 10 : 36. +</pre> + <p> + TABLE 7/C.—Relative heights, weights, and fertility of plants from + parents crossed by a fresh stock, and from parents either self-fertilised + or intercrossed with plants of the same stock. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Names of the plants and nature of the experiments. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Number of plants from a cross with a fresh stock. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Average height in inches and weight. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Number of the plants from self-fertilised or intercrossed + parents of the same stock. + </p> + <p> + Column 5: Average height in inches and weight. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: x, where the ratio of the Height, Weight and Fertility of the + plants from the Cross with a fresh stock is expressed as 100 to x. + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—offspring of plants intercrossed for nine generations +and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of the tenth +intercrossed generation: + 19 : 84.03 : 19 : 65.78 : 78. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Ipomoea purpurea—offspring of plants intercrossed for nine generations +and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of the tenth +intercrossed generation, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 51. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Mimulus luteus—offspring of plants self-fertilised for eight +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the ninth self-fertilised generation: + 28 : 21.62 : 19 : 10.44 : 52. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Mimulus luteus—offspring of plants self-fertilised for eight +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the ninth self-fertilised generation, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 3. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Mimulus luteus—offspring of plants self-fertilised for eight +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with the +offspring of a plant self-fertilised for eight generations, and then +intercrossed with another self-fertilised plant of the same generation: + 28 : 21.62 : 27 : 12.20 : 56. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Mimulus luteus—offspring of plants self-fertilised for eight +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with the +offspring of a plant self-fertilised for eight generations, and then +intercrossed with another self-fertilised plant of the same generation, +in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 4. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Brassica oleracea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for two +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the third self-fertilised generation, by weight: + 6 : : 6 : : 22. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Iberis umbellata—offspring from English variety crossed by slightly +different Algerine variety, compared with the self-fertilised offspring +of the English variety: + 30 : 17.34 : 29 : 15.51 : 89. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Iberis umbellata—offspring from English variety crossed by slightly +different Algerine variety, compared with the self-fertilised offspring +of the English variety, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 75. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—offspring of a Brazilian stock crossed by an +English stock, compared with plants of the Brazilian stock of the second +self-fertilised generation: + 19 : 45.92 : 19 : 50.30 : 109. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—offspring of a Brazilian stock crossed by an +English stock, compared with plants of the Brazilian stock of the second +self-fertilised generation, in weight: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 118. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—offspring of a Brazilian stock crossed by an +English stock, compared with plants of the Brazilian stock of the second +self-fertilised generation, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 40. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—offspring of a Brazilian stock crossed by an +English stock, compared with plants of the Brazilian stock of the second +intercrossed generation, in height: + 19 : 45.92 : 18 : 43.38 : 94. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—offspring of a Brazilian stock crossed by an +English stock, compared with plants of the Brazilian stock of the second +intercrossed generation, in weight: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 100. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Eschscholtzia californica—offspring of a Brazilian stock crossed by an +English stock, compared with plants of the Brazilian stock of the second +intercrossed generation, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 45. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fourth self-fertilised generation: + 16 : 32.82 : 10 : 26.55 : 81. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fourth self-fertilised generation, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 33. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with the +offspring of plants self-fertilised for three generations and then +crossed by plants of the third intercrossed generation: + 16 : 32.82 : 15 : 28.00 : 85. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Dianthus caryophyllus—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with the +offspring of plants self-fertilised for three generations and then +crossed by plants of the third intercrossed generation, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 45. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Pisum sativum—offspring from a cross between two closely allied +varieties, compared with the self-fertilised offspring of one of the +varieties, or with intercrossed plants of the same stock: + ? : : ? : : 60 to 75. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lathyrus odoratus—offspring from two varieties, differing only in +colour of their flowers, compared with the self-fertilised offspring of +one of the varieties: in first generation: + 2 : 79.25 : 2 : 63.75 : 80. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Lathyrus odoratus—offspring from two varieties, differing only in +colour of their flowers, compared with the self-fertilised offspring of +one of the varieties: in second generation: + 6 : 62.91 : 6 : 55.31 : 88. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth self-fertilised generation, in height: + 21 : 50.05 : 21 : 33.23 : 66. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth self-fertilised generation, in weight: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 23. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth self-fertilised generation, grown in open ground, in height: + 10 : 36.67 : 10 : 23.31 : 63. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth self-fertilised generation, grown in open ground, in weight: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 53. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth self-fertilised generation, grown in open ground, in +fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 46. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth intercrossed generation, in height: + 21 : 50.05 : 22 : 54.11 : 108. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth intercrossed generation, in weight: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 101. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth intercrossed generation, grown in open ground, in height: + 10 : 36.67 : 10 : 38.27 : 104. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth intercrossed generation, grown in open ground, in weight: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 146. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Petunia violacea—offspring of plants self-fertilised for four +generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of +the fifth intercrossed generation, grown in open ground, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 54. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a slightly different variety, compared +with plants of the fourth self-fertilised generation, grown not much +crowded in pots, in height: + 26 : 63.29 : 26 : 41.67 : 66. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a slightly different variety, compared +with plants of the fourth self-fertilised generation, grown much crowded +in pots, in height: + 12 : 31.53 : 12 : 17.21 : 54. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a slightly different variety, compared +with plants of the fourth self-fertilised generation, grown much crowded +in pots, in weight: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 37. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a slightly different variety, compared +with plants of the fourth self-fertilised generation, grown in open +ground, in height: + 20 : 48.74 : 20 : 35.20 : 72. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Nicotiana tabacum—offspring of plants self-fertilised for three +generations and then crossed by a slightly different variety, compared +with plants of the fourth self-fertilised generation, grown in open +ground, in weight: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 63. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Anagallis collina—offspring from a red variety crossed by a blue +variety, compared with the self-fertilised offspring of the red variety: + 3 : 27.62 : 3 : 18.21 : 66. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Anagallis collina—offspring from a red variety crossed by a blue +variety, compared with the self-fertilised offspring of the red variety, +in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 6. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Primula veris—offspring from long-styled plants of the third +illegitimate generation, crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants +of the fourth illegitimate and self-fertilised generation: + 8 : 7.03 : 8 : 3.21 : 46. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Primula veris—offspring from long-styled plants of the third +illegitimate generation, crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants +of the fourth illegitimate and self-fertilised generation, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 5. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Primula veris—offspring from long-styled plants of the third +illegitimate generation, crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants +of the fourth illegitimate and self-fertilised generation, in fertility +in following year: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 3.5. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Primula veris—(equal-styled, red-flowered variety)—offspring from +plants self-fertilised for two generations and then crossed by a +different variety, compared with plants of the third self-fertilised +generation: + 3 : 8.66 : 3 : 7.33 : 85. +</pre> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +Primula veris—(equal-styled, red-flowered variety)—offspring from +plants self-fertilised for two generations and then crossed by a +different variety, compared with plants of the third self-fertilised +generation, in fertility: + .. : .. : .. : .. : 11. +</pre> + <p> + In these three tables the measurements of fifty-seven species, belonging + to fifty-two genera and to thirty great natural families, are given. The + species are natives of various parts of the world. The number of crossed + plants, including those derived from a cross between plants of the same + stock and of two different stocks, amounts to 1,101; and the number of + self-fertilised plants (including a few in Table 7/C derived from a cross + between plants of the same old stock) is 1,076. Their growth was observed + from the germination of the seeds to maturity; and most of them were + measured twice and some thrice. The various precautions taken to prevent + either lot being unduly favoured, have been described in the introductory + chapter. Bearing all these circumstances in mind, it may be admitted that + we have a fair basis for judging of the comparative effects of + cross-fertilisation and of self-fertilisation on the growth of the + offspring. + </p> + <p> + It will be the most convenient plan first to consider the results given in + Table 7/C, as an opportunity will thus be afforded of incidentally + discussing some important points. If the reader will look down the right + hand column of this table, he will see at a glance what an extraordinary + advantage in height, weight, and fertility the plants derived from a cross + with a fresh stock or with another sub-variety have over the + self-fertilised plants, as well as over the intercrossed plants of the + same old stock. There are only two exceptions to this rule, and these are + hardly real ones. In the case of Eschscholtzia, the advantage is confined + to fertility. In that of Petunia, though the plants derived from a cross + with a fresh stock had an immense superiority in height, weight, and + fertility over the self-fertilised plants, they were conquered by the + intercrossed plants of the same old stock in height and weight, but not in + fertility. It has, however, been shown that the superiority of these + intercrossed plants in height and weight was in all probability not real; + for if the two sets had been allowed to grow for another month, it is + almost certain that those from a cross with the fresh stock would have + been victorious in every way over the intercrossed plants. + </p> + <p> + Before we consider in detail the several cases given in Table 7/C, some + preliminary remarks must be made. There is the clearest evidence, as we + shall presently see, that the advantage of a cross depends wholly on the + plants differing somewhat in constitution; and that the disadvantages of + self-fertilisation depend on the two parents, which are combined in the + same hermaphrodite flower, having a closely similar constitution. A + certain amount of differentiation in the sexual elements seems + indispensable for the full fertility of the parents, and for the full + vigour of the offspring. All the individuals of the same species, even + those produced in a state of nature, differ somewhat, though often very + slightly, from one another in external characters and probably in + constitution. This obviously holds good between the varieties of the same + species, as far as external characters are concerned; and much evidence + could be advanced with respect to their generally differing somewhat in + constitution. There can hardly be a doubt that the differences of all + kinds between the individuals and varieties of the same species depend + largely, and as I believe exclusively, on their progenitors having been + subjected to different conditions; though the conditions to which the + individuals of the same species are exposed in a state of nature often + falsely appear to us the same. For instance, the individuals growing + together are necessarily exposed to the same climate, and they seem to us + at first sight to be subjected to identically the same conditions; but + this can hardly be the case, except under the unusual contingency of each + individual being surrounded by other kinds of plants in exactly the same + proportional numbers. For the surrounding plants absorb different amounts + of various substances from the soil, and thus greatly affect the + nourishment and even the life of the individuals of any particular + species. These will also be shaded and otherwise affected by the nature of + the surrounding plants. Moreover, seeds often lie dormant in the ground, + and those which germinate during any one year will often have been matured + during very different seasons. Seeds are widely dispersed by various + means, and some will occasionally be brought from distant stations, where + their parents have grown under somewhat different conditions, and the + plants produced from such seeds will intercross with the old residents, + thus mingling their constitutional peculiarities in all sorts of + proportions. + </p> + <p> + Plants when first subjected to culture, even in their native country, + cannot fail to be exposed to greatly changed conditions of life, more + especially from growing in cleared ground, and from not having to compete + with many or any surrounding plants. They are thus enabled to absorb + whatever they require which the soil may contain. Fresh seeds are often + brought from distant gardens, where the parent-plants have been subjected + to different conditions. Cultivated plants like those in a state of nature + frequently intercross, and will thus mingle their constitutional + peculiarities. On the other hand, as long as the individuals of any + species are cultivated in the same garden, they will apparently be + subjected to more uniform conditions than plants in a state of nature, as + the individuals have not to compete with various surrounding species. The + seeds sown at the same time in a garden have generally been matured during + the same season and in the same place; and in this respect they differ + much from the seeds sown by the hand of nature. Some exotic plants are not + frequented by the native insects in their new home, and therefore are not + intercrossed; and this appears to be a highly important factor in the + individuals acquiring uniformity of constitution. + </p> + <p> + In my experiments the greatest care was taken that in each generation all + the crossed and self-fertilised plants should be subjected to the same + conditions. Not that the conditions were absolutely the same, for the more + vigorous individuals will have robbed the weaker ones of nutriment, and + likewise of water when the soil in the pots was becoming dry; and both + lots at one end of the pot will have received a little more light than + those at the other end. In the successive generations, the plants were + subjected to somewhat different conditions, for the seasons necessarily + varied, and they were sometimes raised at different periods of the year. + But as they were all kept under glass, they were exposed to far less + abrupt and great changes of temperature and moisture than are plants + growing out of doors. With respect to the intercrossed plants, their first + parents, which were not related, would almost certainly have differed + somewhat in constitution; and such constitutional peculiarities would be + variously mingled in each succeeding intercrossed generation, being + sometimes augmented, but more commonly neutralised in a greater or less + degree, and sometimes revived through reversion; just as we know to be the + case with the external characters of crossed species and varieties. With + the plants which were self-fertilised during the successive generations, + this latter important source of some diversity of constitution will have + been wholly eliminated; and the sexual elements produced by the same + flower must have been developed under as nearly the same conditions as it + is possible to conceive. + </p> + <p> + In Table 7/C the crossed plants are the offspring of a cross with a fresh + stock, or with a distinct variety; and they were put into competition + either with self-fertilised plants, or with intercrossed plants of the + same old stock. By the term fresh stock I mean a non-related plant, the + progenitors of which have been raised during some generations in another + garden, and have consequently been exposed to somewhat different + conditions. In the case of Nicotiana, Iberis, the red variety of Primula, + the common Pea, and perhaps Anagallis, the plants which were crossed may + be ranked as distinct varieties or sub-varieties of the same species; but + with Ipomoea, Mimulus, Dianthus, and Petunia, the plants which were + crossed differed exclusively in the tint of their flowers; and as a large + proportion of the plants raised from the same lot of purchased seeds thus + varied, the differences may be estimated as merely individual. Having made + these preliminary remarks, we will now consider in detail the several + cases given in Table 7/C, and they are well worthy of full consideration. + </p> + <p> + 1. Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Plants growing in the same pots, and subjected in each generation to the + same conditions, were intercrossed for nine consecutive generations. These + intercrossed plants thus became in the later generations more or less + closely inter-related. Flowers on the plants of the ninth intercrossed + generation were fertilised with pollen taken from a fresh stock, and + seedlings thus raised. Other flowers on the same intercrossed plants were + fertilised with pollen from another intercrossed plant, producing + seedlings of the tenth intercrossed generation. These two sets of + seedlings were grown in competition with one another, and differed greatly + in height and fertility. For the offspring from the cross with a fresh + stock exceeded in height the intercrossed plants in the ratio of 100 to + 78; and this is nearly the same excess which the intercrossed had over the + self-fertilised plants in all ten generations taken together, namely, as + 100 to 77. The plants raised from the cross with a fresh stock were also + greatly superior in fertility to the intercrossed, namely, in the ratio of + 100 to 51, as judged by the relative weight of the seed-capsules produced + by an equal number of plants of the two sets, both having been left to be + naturally fertilised. It should be especially observed that none of the + plants of either lot were the product of self-fertilisation. On the + contrary, the intercrossed plants had certainly been crossed for the last + ten generations, and probably, during all previous generations, as we may + infer from the structure of the flowers and from the frequency of the + visits of humble-bees. And so it will have been with the parent-plants of + the fresh stock. The whole great difference in height and fertility + between the two lots must be attributed to the one being the product of a + cross with pollen from a fresh stock, and the other of a cross between + plants of the same old stock. + </p> + <p> + This species offers another interesting case. In the five first + generations in which intercrossed and self-fertilised plants were put into + competition with one another, every single intercrossed plant beat its + self-fertilised antagonist, except in one instance, in which they were + equal in height. But in the sixth generation a plant appeared, named by me + the Hero, remarkable for its tallness and increased self-fertility, and + which transmitted its characters to the next three generations. The + children of Hero were again self-fertilised, forming the eighth + self-fertilised generation, and were likewise intercrossed one with + another; but this cross between plants which had been subjected to the + same conditions and had been self-fertilised during the seven previous + generations, did not effect the least good; for the intercrossed + grandchildren were actually shorter than the self-fertilised + grandchildren, in the ratio of 100 to 107. We here see that the mere act + of crossing two distinct plants does not by itself benefit the offspring. + This case is almost the converse of that in the last paragraph, on which + the offspring profited so greatly by a cross with a fresh stock. A similar + trial was made with the descendants of Hero in the following generation, + and with the same result. But the trial cannot be fully trusted, owing to + the extremely unhealthy condition of the plants. Subject to this same + serious cause of doubt, even a cross with a fresh stock did not benefit + the great-grandchildren of Hero; and if this were really the case, it is + the greatest anomaly observed by me in all my experiments. + </p> + <p> + 2. Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + During the three first generations the intercrossed plants taken together + exceeded in height the self-fertilised taken together, in the ratio of 100 + to 65, and in fertility in a still higher degree. In the fourth generation + a new variety, which grew taller and had whiter and larger flowers than + the old varieties, began to prevail, especially amongst the + self-fertilised plants. This variety transmitted its characters with + remarkable fidelity, so that all the plants in the later self-fertilised + generations belonged to it. These consequently exceeded the intercrossed + plants considerably in height. Thus in the seventh generation the + intercrossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 to 137. + It is a more remarkable fact that the self-fertilised plants of the sixth + generation had become much more fertile than the intercrossed plants, + judging by the number of capsules spontaneously produced, in the ratio of + 147 to 100. This variety, which as we have seen appeared amongst the + plants of the fourth self-fertilised generation, resembles in almost all + its constitutional peculiarities the variety called Hero which appeared in + the sixth self-fertilised generation of Ipomoea. No other such case, with + the partial exception of that of Nicotiana, occurred in my experiments, + carried on during eleven years. + </p> + <p> + Two plants of this variety of Mimulus, belonging to the sixth + self-fertilised generation, and growing in separate pots, were + intercrossed; and some flowers on the same plants were again + self-fertilised. From the seeds thus obtained, plants derived from a cross + between the self-fertilised plants, and others of the seventh + self-fertilised generation, were raised. But this cross did not do the + least good, the intercrossed plants being inferior in height to the + self-fertilised, in the ratio of 100 to 110. This case is exactly parallel + with that given under Ipomoea, of the grandchildren of Hero, and + apparently of its great-grandchildren; for the seedlings raised by + intercrossing these plants were not in any way superior to those of the + corresponding generation raised from the self-fertilised flowers. + Therefore in these several cases the crossing of plants, which had been + self-fertilised for several generations and which had been cultivated all + the time under as nearly as possible the same conditions, was not in the + least beneficial. + </p> + <p> + Another experiment was now tried. Firstly, plants of the eighth + self-fertilised generation were again self-fertilised, producing plants of + the ninth self-fertilised generation. Secondly, two of the plants of the + eighth self-fertilised generation were intercrossed one with another, as + in the experiment above referred to; but this was now effected on plants + which had been subjected to two additional generations of + self-fertilisation. Thirdly, the same plants of the eighth self-fertilised + generation were crossed with pollen from plants of a fresh stock brought + from a distant garden. Numerous plants were raised from these three sets + of seeds, and grown in competition with one another. The plants derived + from a cross between the self-fertilised plants exceeded in height by a + little the self-fertilised, namely, as 100 to 92; and in fertility in a + greater degree, namely, as 100 to 73. I do not know whether this + difference in the result, compared with that in the previous case, can be + accounted for by the increased deterioration of the self-fertilised plants + from two additional generations of self-fertilisation, and the consequent + advantage of any cross whatever, along merely between the self-fertilised + plants. But however this may be, the effects of crossing the + self-fertilised plants of the eighth generation with a fresh stock were + extremely striking; for the seedlings thus raised were to the + self-fertilised of the ninth generation as 100 to 52 in height, and as 100 + to 3 in fertility! They were also to the intercrossed plants (derived from + crossing two of the self-fertilised plants of the eighth generation) in + height as 100 to 56, and in fertility as 100 to 4. Better evidence could + hardly be desired of the potent influence of a cross with a fresh stock on + plants which had been self-fertilised for eight generations, and had been + cultivated all the time under nearly uniform conditions, in comparison + with plants self-fertilised for nine generations continuously, or then + once intercrossed, namely in the last generation. + </p> + <p> + 3. Brassica oleracea. + </p> + <p> + Some flowers on cabbage plants of the second self-fertilised generation + were crossed with pollen from a plant of the same variety brought from a + distant garden, and other flowers were again self-fertilised. Plants + derived from a cross with a fresh stock and plants of the third + self-fertilised generation were thus raised. The former were to the + self-fertilised in weight as 100 to 22; and this enormous difference must + be attributed in part to the beneficial effects of a cross with a fresh + stock, and in part to the deteriorating effects of self-fertilisation + continued during three generations. + </p> + <p> + 4. Iberis umbellata. + </p> + <p> + Seedlings from a crimson English variety crossed by a pale-coloured + variety which had been grown for some generations in Algiers, were to the + self-fertilised seedlings from the crimson variety in height as 100 to 89, + and as 100 to 75 in fertility. I am surprised that this cross with another + variety did not produce a still more strongly marked beneficial effect; + for some intercrossed plants of the crimson English variety, put into + competition with plants of the same variety self-fertilised during three + generations, were in height as 100 to 86, and in fertility as 100 to 75. + The slightly greater difference in height in this latter case, may + possibly be attributed to the deteriorating effects of self-fertilisation + carried on for two additional generations. + </p> + <p> + 5. Eschscholtzia californica. + </p> + <p> + This plant offers an almost unique case, inasmuch as the good effects of a + cross are confined to the reproductive system. Intercrossed and + self-fertilised plants of the English stock did not differ in height (nor + in weight, as far as was ascertained) in any constant manner; the + self-fertilised plants usually having the advantage. So it was with the + offspring of plants of the Brazilian stock, tried in the same manner. The + parent-plants, however, of the English stock produced many more seeds when + fertilised with pollen from another plant than when self-fertilised; and + in Brazil the parent-plants were absolutely sterile unless they were + fertilised with pollen from another plant. Intercrossed seedlings, raised + in England from the Brazilian stock, compared with self-fertilised + seedlings of the corresponding second generation, yielded seeds in number + as 100 to 89; both lots of plants being left freely exposed to the visits + of insects. If we now turn to the effects of crossing plants of the + Brazilian stock with pollen from the English stock,—so that plants + which had been long exposed to very different conditions were + intercrossed,—we find that the offspring were, as before, inferior + in height and weight to the plants of the Brazilian stock after two + generations of self-fertilisation, but were superior to them in the most + marked manner in the number of seeds produced, namely, as 100 to 40; both + lots of plants being left freely exposed to the visits of insects. + </p> + <p> + In the case of Ipomoea, we have seen that the plants derived from a cross + with a fresh stock were superior in height as 100 to 78, and in fertility + as 100 to 51, to the plants of the old stock, although these had been + intercrossed during the last ten generations. With Eschscholtzia we have a + nearly parallel case, but only as far as fertility is concerned, for the + plants derived from a cross with a fresh stock were superior in fertility + in the ratio of 100 to 45 to the Brazilian plants, which had been + artificially intercrossed in England for the two last generations, and + which must have been naturally intercrossed by insects during all previous + generations in Brazil, where otherwise they are quite sterile. + </p> + <p> + 6. Dianthus caryophyllus. + </p> + <p> + Plants self-fertilised for three generations were crossed with pollen from + a fresh stock, and their offspring were grown in competition with plants + of the fourth self-fertilised generation. The crossed plants thus obtained + were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 to 81, and in fertility (both + lots being left to be naturally fertilised by insects) as 100 to 33. + </p> + <p> + These same crossed plants were also to the offspring from the plants of + the third generation crossed by the intercrossed plants of the + corresponding generation, in height as 100 to 85, and in fertility as 100 + to 45. + </p> + <p> + We thus see what a great advantage the offspring from a cross with a fresh + stock had, not only over the self-fertilised plants of the fourth + generation, but over the offspring from the self-fertilised plants of the + third generation, when crossed by the intercrossed plants of the old + stock. + </p> + <p> + 7. Pisum sativum. + </p> + <p> + It has been shown under the head of this species, that the several + varieties in this country almost invariably fertilise themselves, owing to + insects rarely visiting the flowers; and as the plants have been long + cultivated under nearly similar conditions, we can understand why a cross + between two individuals of the same variety does not do the least good to + the offspring either in height or fertility. This case is almost exactly + parallel with that of Mimulus, or that of the Ipomoea named Hero; for in + these two instances, crossing plants which had been self-fertilised for + seven generations did not at all benefit the offspring. On the other hand, + a cross between two varieties of the pea causes a marked superiority in + the growth and vigour of the offspring, over the self-fertilised plants of + the same varieties, as shown by two excellent observers. From my own + observations (not made with great care) the offspring from crossed + varieties were to self-fertilised plants in height, in one case as 100 to + about 75, and in a second case as 100 to 60. + </p> + <p> + 8. Lathyrus odoratus. + </p> + <p> + The sweet-pea is in the same state in regard to self-fertilisation as the + common pea; and we have seen that seedlings from a cross between two + varieties, which differed in no respect except in the colour of their + flowers, were to the self-fertilised seedlings from the same mother-plant + in height as 100 to 80; and in the second generation as 100 to 88. + Unfortunately I did not ascertain whether crossing two plants of the same + variety failed to produce any beneficial effect, but I venture to predict + such would be the result. + </p> + <p> + 9. Petunia violacea. + </p> + <p> + The intercrossed plants of the same stock in four out of the five + successive generations plainly exceeded in height the self-fertilised + plants. The latter in the fourth generation were crossed by a fresh stock, + and the seedlings thus obtained were put into competition with the + self-fertilised plants of the fifth generation. The crossed plants + exceeded the self-fertilised in height in the ratio of 100 to 66, and in + weight as 100 to 23; but this difference, though so great, is not much + greater than that between the intercrossed plants of the same stock in + comparison with the self-fertilised plants of the corresponding + generation. This case, therefore, seems at first sight opposed to the rule + that a cross with a fresh stock is much more beneficial than a cross + between individuals of the same stock. But as with Eschscholtzia, the + reproductive system was here chiefly benefited; for the plants raised from + the cross with the fresh stock were to the self-fertilised plants in + fertility, both lots being naturally fertilised, as 100 to 46, whereas the + intercrossed plants of the same stock were to the self-fertilised plants + of the corresponding fifth generation in fertility only as 100 to 86. + </p> + <p> + Although at the time of measurement the plants raised from the cross with + the fresh stock did not exceed in height or weight the intercrossed plants + of the old stock (owing to the growth of the former not having been + completed, as explained under the head of this species), yet they exceeded + the intercrossed plants in fertility in the ratio of 100 to 54. This fact + is interesting, as it shows that plants self-fertilised for four + generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, yielded seedlings which + were nearly twice as fertile as those from plants of the same stock which + had been intercrossed for the five previous generations. We here see, as + with Eschscholtzia and Dianthus, that the mere act of crossing, + independently of the state of the crossed plants, has little efficacy in + giving increased fertility to the offspring. The same conclusion holds + good, as we have already seen, in the analogous cases of Ipomoea, Mimulus, + and Dianthus, with respect to height. + </p> + <p> + 10. Nicotiana tabacum. + </p> + <p> + My plants were remarkably self-fertile, and the capsules from the + self-fertilised flowers apparently yielded more seeds than those which + were cross-fertilised. No insects were seen to visit the flowers in the + hothouse, and I suspect that the stock on which I experimented had been + raised under glass, and had been self-fertilised during several previous + generations; if so, we can understand why, in the course of three + generations, the crossed seedlings of the same stock did not uniformly + exceed in height the self-fertilised seedlings. But the case is + complicated by individual plants having different constitutions, so that + some of the crossed and self-fertilised seedlings raised at the same time + from the same parents behaved differently. However this may be, plants + raised from self-fertilised plants of the third generation crossed by a + slightly different sub-variety, exceeded greatly in height and weight the + self-fertilised plants of the fourth generation; and the trial was made on + a large scale. They exceeded them in height when grown in pots, and not + much crowded, in the ratio of 100 to 66; and when much crowded, as 100 to + 54. These crossed plants, when thus subjected to severe competition, also + exceeded the self-fertilised in weight in the ratio of 100 to 37. So it + was, but in a less degree (as may be seen in Table 7/C), when the two lots + were grown out of doors and not subjected to any mutual competition. + Nevertheless, strange as is the fact, the flowers on the mother-plants of + the third self-fertilised generation did not yield more seed when they + were crossed with pollen from plants of the fresh stock than when they + were self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + 11. Anagallis collina. + </p> + <p> + Plants raised from a red variety crossed by another plant of the same + variety were in height to the self-fertilised plants from the red variety + as 100 to 73. When the flowers on the red variety were fertilised with + pollen from a closely similar blue-flowered variety, they yielded double + the number of seeds to what they did when crossed by pollen from another + individual of the same red variety, and the seeds were much finer. The + plants raised from this cross between the two varieties were to the + self-fertilised seedlings from the red variety, in height as 100 to 66, + and in fertility as 100 to 6. + </p> + <p> + 12. Primula veris. + </p> + <p> + Some flowers on long-styled plants of the third illegitimate generation + were legitimately crossed with pollen from a fresh stock, and others were + fertilised with their own pollen. From the seeds thus produced crossed + plants, and self-fertilised plants of the fourth illegitimate generation, + were raised. The former were to the latter in height as 100 to 46, and in + fertility during one year as 100 to 5, and as 100 to 3.5 during the next + year. In this case, however, we have no means of distinguishing between + the evil effects of illegitimate fertilisation continued during four + generations (that is, by pollen of the same form, but taken from a + distinct plant) and strict self-fertilisation. But it is probable that + these two processes do not differ so essentially as at first appears to be + the case. In the following experiment any doubt arising from illegitimate + fertilisation was completely eliminated. + </p> + <p> + 13. Primula veris. (Equal-styled, red-flowered variety.) + </p> + <p> + Flowers on plants of the second self-fertilised generation were crossed + with pollen from a distinct variety or fresh stock, and others were again + self-fertilised. Crossed plants and plants of the third self-fertilised + generation, all of legitimate origin, were thus raised; and the former was + to the latter in height as 100 to 85, and in fertility (as judged by the + number of capsules produced, together with the average number of seeds) as + 100 to 11. + </p> + <h3> + A SUMMARY OF THE MEASUREMENTS IN TABLE 7/C. + </h3> + <p> + This table includes the heights and often the weights of 292 plants + derived from a cross with a fresh stock, and of 305 plants, either of + self-fertilised origin, or derived from an intercross between plants of + the same stock. These 597 plants belong to thirteen species and twelve + genera. The various precautions which were taken to ensure a fair + comparison have already been stated. If we now look down the right hand + column, in which the mean height, weight, and fertility of the plants + derived from a cross with a fresh stock are represented by 100, we shall + see by the other figures how wonderfully superior they are both to the + self-fertilised and to the intercrossed plants of the same stock. With + respect to height and weight, there are only two exceptions to the rule, + namely, with Eschscholtzia and Petunia, and the latter is probably no real + exception. Nor do these two species offer an exception in regard to + fertility, for the plants derived from the cross with a fresh stock were + much more fertile than the self-fertilised plants. The difference between + the two sets of plants in the table is generally much greater in fertility + than in height or weight. On the other hand, with some of the species, as + with Nicotiana, there was no difference in fertility between the two sets, + although a great difference in height and weight. Considering all the + cases in this table, there can be no doubt that plants profit immensely, + though in different ways, by a cross with a fresh stock or with a distinct + sub-variety. It cannot be maintained that the benefit thus derived is due + merely to the plants of the fresh stock being perfectly healthy, whilst + those which had been long intercrossed or self-fertilised had become + unhealthy; for in most cases there was no appearance of such + unhealthiness, and we shall see under Table 7/A that the intercrossed + plants of the same stock are generally superior to a certain extent to the + self-fertilised,—both lots having been subjected to exactly the same + conditions and being equally healthy or unhealthy. + </p> + <p> + We further learn from Table 7/C, that a cross between plants that have + been self-fertilised during several successive generations and kept all + the time under nearly uniform conditions, does not benefit the offspring + in the least or only in a very slight degree. Mimulus and the descendants + of Ipomoea named Hero offer instances of this rule. Again, plants + self-fertilised during several generations profit only to a small extent + by a cross with intercrossed plants of the same stock (as in the case of + Dianthus), in comparison with the effects of a cross by a fresh stock. + Plants of the same stock intercrossed during several generations (as with + Petunia) were inferior in a marked manner in fertility to those derived + from the corresponding self-fertilised plants crossed by a fresh stock. + Lastly, certain plants which are regularly intercrossed by insects in a + state of nature, and which were artificially crossed in each succeeding + generation in the course of my experiments, so that they can never or most + rarely have suffered any evil from self-fertilisation (as with + Eschscholtzia and Ipomoea), nevertheless profited greatly by a cross with + a fresh stock. These several cases taken together show us in the clearest + manner that it is not the mere crossing of any two individuals which is + beneficial to the offspring. The benefit thus derived depends on the + plants which are united differing in some manner, and there can hardly be + a doubt that it is in the constitution or nature of the sexual elements. + Anyhow, it is certain that the differences are not of an external nature, + for two plants which resemble each other as closely as the individuals of + the same species ever do, profit in the plainest manner when intercrossed, + if their progenitors have been exposed during several generations to + different conditions. But to this latter subject I shall have to recur in + a future chapter. + </p> + <h3> + TABLE 7/A. + </h3> + <p> + We will now turn to our first table, which relates to crossed and + self-fertilised plants of the same stock. These consist of fifty-four + species belonging to thirty natural orders. The total number of crossed + plants of which measurements are given is 796, and of self-fertilised 809; + that is altogether 1,605 plants. Some of the species were experimented on + during several successive generations; and it should be borne in mind that + in such cases the crossed plants in each generation were crossed with + pollen from another crossed plant, and the flowers on the self-fertilised + plants were almost always fertilised with their own pollen, though + sometimes with pollen from other flowers on the same plant. The crossed + plants thus became more or less closely inter-related in the later + generations; and both lots were subjected in each generation to almost + absolutely the same conditions, and to nearly the same conditions in the + successive generations. It would have been a better plan in some respects + if I had always crossed some flowers either on the self-fertilised or + intercrossed plants of each generation with pollen from a non-related + plant, grown under different conditions, as was done with the plants in + Table 7/C; for by this procedure I should have learnt how much the + offspring became deteriorated through continued self-fertilisation in the + successive generations. As the case stands, the self-fertilised plants of + the successive generations in Table 7/A were put into competition with and + compared with intercrossed plants, which were probably deteriorated in + some degree by being more or less inter-related and grown under similar + conditions. Nevertheless, had I always followed the plan in Table 7/C, I + should not have discovered the important fact that, although a cross + between plants which are rather closely related and which had been + subjected to closely similar conditions, gives during several generations + some advantage to the offspring, yet that after a time they may be + intercrossed with no advantage whatever to the offspring. Nor should I + have learnt that the self-fertilised plants of the later generations might + be crossed with intercrossed plants of the same stock with little or no + advantage, although they profited to an extraordinary degree by a cross + with a fresh stock. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the greater number of the plants in Table 7/A, nothing + special need here be said; full particulars may be found under the head of + each species by the aid of the Index. The figures in the right-hand column + show the mean height of the self-fertilised plants, that of the crossed + plants with which they competed being represented by 100. No notice is + here taken of the few cases in which crossed and self-fertilised plants + were grown in the open ground, so as not to compete together. The table + includes, as we have seen, plants belonging to fifty-four species, but as + some of these were measured during several successive generations, there + are eighty-three cases in which crossed and self-fertilised plants were + compared. As in each generation the number of plants which were measured + (given in the table) was never very large and sometimes small, whenever in + the right hand column the mean height of the crossed and self-fertilised + plants is the same within five per cent, their heights may be considered + as practically equal. Of such cases, that is, of self-fertilised plants of + which the mean height is expressed by figures between 95 and 105, there + are eighteen, either in some one or all the generations. There are eight + cases in which the self-fertilised plants exceed the crossed by above five + per cent, as shown by the figures in the right hand column being above + 105. Lastly, there are fifty-seven cases in which the crossed plants + exceed the self-fertilised in a ratio of at least 100 to 95, and generally + in a much higher degree. + </p> + <p> + If the relative heights of the crossed and self-fertilised plants had been + due to mere chance, there would have been about as many cases of + self-fertilised plants exceeding the crossed in height by above five per + cent as of the crossed thus exceeding the self-fertilised; but we see that + of the latter there are fifty-seven cases, and of the former only eight + cases; so that the cases in which the crossed plants exceed in height the + self-fertilised in the above proportion are more than seven times as + numerous as those in which the self-fertilised exceed the crossed in the + same proportion. For our special purpose of comparing the powers of growth + of crossed and self-fertilised plants, it may be said that in fifty-seven + cases the crossed plants exceeded the self-fertilised by more than five + per cent, and that in twenty-six cases (18 + 8) they did not thus exceed + them. But we shall now show that in several of these twenty-six cases the + crossed plants had a decided advantage over the self-fertilised in other + respects, though not in height; that in other cases the mean heights are + not trustworthy, owing to too few plants having been measured, or to their + having grown unequally from being unhealthy, or to both causes combined. + Nevertheless, as these cases are opposed to my general conclusion I have + felt bound to give them. Lastly, the cause of the crossed plants having no + advantage over the self-fertilised can be explained in some other cases. + Thus a very small residue is left in which the self-fertilised plants + appear, as far as my experiments serve, to be really equal or superior to + the crossed plants. + </p> + <p> + We will now consider in some little detail the eighteen cases in which the + self-fertilised plants equalled in average height the crossed plants + within five per cent; and the eight cases in which the self-fertilised + plants exceeded in average height the crossed plants by above five per + cent; making altogether twenty-six cases in which the crossed plants were + not taller than the self-fertilised plants in any marked degree. + </p> + <p> + [1. Dianthus caryophyllus (third generation). + </p> + <p> + This plant was experimented on during four generations, in three of which + the crossed plants exceeded in height the self-fertilised generally by + much more than five per cent; and we have seen under Table 7/C that the + offspring from the plants of the third self-fertilised generation crossed + by a fresh stock profited in height and fertility to an extraordinary + degree. But in this third generation the crossed plants of the same stock + were in height to the self-fertilised only as 100 to 99, that is, they + were practically equal. Nevertheless, when the eight crossed and eight + self-fertilised plants were cut down and weighed, the former were to the + latter in weight as 100 to 49! There can therefore be not the least doubt + that the crossed plants of this species are greatly superior in vigour and + luxuriance to the self-fertilised; and what was the cause of the + self-fertilised plants of the third generation, though so light and thin, + growing up so as almost to equal the crossed in height, I cannot explain. + </p> + <p> + 2. Lobelia fulgens (first generation). + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants of this generation were much inferior in height to the + self-fertilised, in the proportion of 100 to 127. Although only two pairs + were measured, which is obviously much too few to be trusted, yet from + other evidence given under the head of this species, it is certain that + the self-fertilised plants were very much more vigorous than the crossed. + As I used pollen of unequal maturity for crossing and self-fertilising the + parent-plants, it is possible that the great difference in the growth of + their offspring may have been due to this cause. In the next generation + this source of error was avoided, and many more plants were raised, and + now the average height of the twenty-three crossed plants was to that of + the twenty-three self-fertilised plants as 100 to 91. We can therefore + hardly doubt that a cross is beneficial to this species. + </p> + <p> + 3. Petunia violacea (third generation). + </p> + <p> + Eight crossed plants were to eight self-fertilised of the third generation + in average height as 100 to 131; and at an early age the crossed were + inferior even in a still higher degree. But it is a remarkable fact that + in one pot in which plants of both lots grew extremely crowded, the + crossed were thrice as tall as the self-fertilised. As in the two + preceding and two succeeding generations, as well as with plants raised by + a crossed with a fresh stock, the crossed greatly exceeded the + self-fertilised in height, weight, and fertility (when these two latter + points were attended to), the present case must be looked at as an anomaly + not affecting the general rule. The most probable explanation is that the + seeds from which the crossed plants of the third generation were raised + were not well ripened; for I have observed an analogous case with Iberis. + Self-fertilised seedlings of this latter plant, which were known to have + been produced from seeds not well matured, grew from the first much more + quickly than the crossed plants, which were raised from better matured + seeds; so that having thus once got a great start they were enabled ever + afterwards to retain their advantage. Some of these same seeds of the + Iberis were sown on the opposite sides of pots filled with burnt earth and + pure sand, not containing any organic matter; and now the young crossed + seedlings grew during their short life to double the height of the + self-fertilised, in the same manner as occurred with the above two sets of + seedlings of Petunia which were much crowded and thus exposed to very + unfavourable conditions. We have seen also in the eighth generation of + Ipomoea that the self-fertilised seedlings raised from unhealthy parents + grew at first very much more quickly than the crossed seedlings, so that + they were for a long time much taller, though ultimately beaten by them. + </p> + <p> + 4, 5, 6. Eschscholtzia californica. + </p> + <p> + Four sets of measurements are given in Table 7/A. In one of these the + crossed plants exceed the self-fertilised in average height, so that this + is not one of the exceptions here to be considered. In two other cases the + crossed equalled the self-fertilised in height within five per cent; and + in the fourth case the self-fertilised exceeded the crossed by above this + limit. We have seen in Table 7/C that the whole advantage of a cross by a + fresh stock is confined to fertility, and so it was with the intercrossed + plants of the same stock compared with the self-fertilised, for the former + were in fertility to the latter as 100 to 89. The intercrossed plants thus + have at least one important advantage over the self-fertilised. Moreover, + the flowers on the parent-plants when fertilised with pollen from another + individual of the same stock yield far more seeds than when + self-fertilised; the flowers in this latter case being often quite + sterile. We may therefore conclude that a cross does some good, though it + does not give to the crossed seedlings increased powers of growth. + </p> + <p> + 7. Viscaria oculata. + </p> + <p> + The average height of the fifteen intercrossed plants to that of the + fifteen self-fertilised plants was only as 100 to 97; but the former + produced many more capsules than the latter, in the ratio of 100 to 77. + Moreover, the flowers on the parent-plants which were crossed and + self-fertilised, yielded seeds on one occasion in the proportion of 100 to + 38, and on a second occasion in the proportion of 100 to 58. So that there + can be no doubt about the beneficial effects of a cross, although the mean + height of the crossed plants was only three per cent above that of the + self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + 8. Specularia speculum. + </p> + <p> + Only the four tallest of the crossed and the four tallest of the + self-fertilised plants, growing in four pots, were measured; and the + former were to the latter in height as 100 to 98. In all four pots a + crossed plant flowered before any one of the self-fertilised plants, and + this is usually a safe indication of some real superiority in the crossed + plants. The flowers on the parent-plants which were crossed with pollen + from another plant yielded seeds compared with the self-fertilised flowers + in the ratio of 100 to 72. We may therefore draw the same conclusion as in + the last case with respect to a cross being decidedly beneficial. + </p> + <p> + 9. Borago officinalis. + </p> + <p> + Only four crossed and four self-fertilised plants were raised and + measured, and the former were to the latter in height as 100 to 102. So + small a number of measurements ought never to be trusted; and in the + present instance the advantage of the self-fertilised over the crossed + plants depended almost entirely on one of the self-fertilised plants + having grown to an unusual height. All four crossed plants flowered before + their self-fertilised opponents. The cross-fertilised flowers on the + parent-plants in comparison with the self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + in the proportion of 100 to 60. So that here again we may draw the same + conclusion as in the two last cases. + </p> + <p> + 10. Passiflora gracilis. + </p> + <p> + Only two crossed and two self-fertilised plants were raised; and the + former were to the latter in height as 100 to 104. On the other hand, + fruits from the cross-fertilised flowers on the parent-plants contained + seeds in number, compared with those from the self-fertilised flowers, in + the proportion of 100 to 85. + </p> + <p> + 11. Phaseolus multiflorus. + </p> + <p> + The five crossed plants were to the five self-fertilised in height as 100 + to 96. Although the crossed plants were thus only four per cent taller + than the self-fertilised, they flowered in both pots before them. It is + therefore probable that they had some real advantage over the + self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + 12. Adonis aestivalis. + </p> + <p> + The four crossed plants were almost exactly equal in height to the four + self-fertilised plants, but as so few plants were measured, and as these + were all “miserably unhealthy,” nothing can be inferred with safety with + respect to their relative heights. + </p> + <p> + 13. Bartonia aurea. + </p> + <p> + The eight crossed plants were to the eight self-fertilised in height as + 100 to 107. This number of plants, considering the care with which they + were raised and compared, ought to have given a trustworthy result. But + from some unknown cause they grew very unequally, and they became so + unhealthy that only three of the crossed and three of the self-fertilised + plants set any seeds, and these few in number. Under these circumstances + the mean height of neither lot can be trusted, and the experiment is + valueless. The cross-fertilised flowers on the parent-plants yielded + rather more seeds than the self-fertilised flowers. + </p> + <p> + 14. Thunbergia alata. + </p> + <p> + The six crossed plants were to the six self-fertilised in height as 100 to + 108. Here the self-fertilised plants seem to have a decided advantage; but + both lots grew unequally, some of the plants in both being more than twice + as tall as others. The parent-plants also were in an odd semi-sterile + condition. Under these circumstances the superiority of the + self-fertilised plants cannot be fully trusted. + </p> + <p> + 15. Nolana prostrata. + </p> + <p> + The five crossed plants were to the five self-fertilised in height as 100 + to 105; so that the latter seem here to have a small but decided + advantage. On the other hand, the flowers on the parent-plants which were + cross-fertilised produced very many more capsules than the self-fertilised + flowers, in the ratio of 100 to 21; and the seeds which the former + contained were heavier than an equal number from the self-fertilised + capsules in the ratio of 100 to 82. + </p> + <p> + 16. Hibiscus africanus. + </p> + <p> + Only four pairs were raised, and the crossed were to the self-fertilised + in height as 100 to 109. Excepting that too few plants were measured, I + know of nothing else to cause distrust in the result. The cross-fertilised + flowers on the parent-plants were, on the other hand, rather more + productive than the self-fertilised flowers. + </p> + <p> + 17. Apium petroselinum. + </p> + <p> + A few plants (number not recorded) derived from flowers believed to have + been crossed by insects and a few self-fertilised plants were grown on the + opposite sides of four pots. They attained to a nearly equal height, the + crossed having a very slight advantage. + </p> + <p> + 18. Vandellia nummularifolia. + </p> + <p> + Twenty crossed plants raised from the seeds of perfect flowers were to + twenty self-fertilised plants, likewise raised from the seeds of perfect + flowers, in height as 100 to 99. The experiment was repeated, with the + sole difference that the plants were allowed to grow more crowded; and now + the twenty-four tallest of the crossed plants were to the twenty-four + tallest self-fertilised plants in height as 100 to 94, and in weight as + 100 to 97. Moreover, a larger number of the crossed than of the + self-fertilised plants grew to a moderate height. The above-mentioned + twenty crossed plants were also grown in competition with twenty + self-fertilised plants raised from the closed or cleistogene flowers, and + their heights were as 100 to 94. Therefore had it not been for the first + trial, in which the crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height + only as 100 to 99, this species might have been classed with those in + which the crossed plants exceed the self-fertilised by above five per + cent. On the other hand, the crossed plants in the second trial bore fewer + capsules; and these contained fewer seeds, than did the self-fertilised + plants, all the capsules having been produced by cleistogene flowers. The + whole case therefore must be left doubtful. + </p> + <p> + 19. Pisum sativum (common pea). + </p> + <p> + Four-plants derived from a cross between individuals of the same variety + were in height to four self-fertilised plants belonging to the same + variety as 100 to 115. Although this cross did no good, we have seen under + Table 7/C that a cross between distinct varieties adds greatly to the + height and vigour of the offspring; and it was there explained that the + fact of a cross between the individuals of the same variety not being + beneficial, is almost certainly due to their having been self-fertilised + for many generations, and in each generation grown under nearly similar + conditions. + </p> + <p> + 20, 21, 22. Canna warscewiczi. + </p> + <p> + Plants belonging to three generations were observed, and in all of three + the crossed were approximately equal to the self-fertilised; the average + height of the thirty-four crossed plants being to that of the same number + of self-fertilised plants as 100 to 101. Therefore the crossed plants had + no advantage over the self-fertilised; and it is probable that the same + explanation here holds good as in the case of Pisum sativum; for the + flowers of this Canna are perfectly self-fertile, and were never seen to + be visited by insects in the hothouse, so as to be crossed by them. This + plant, moreover, has been cultivated under glass for several generations + in pots, and therefore under nearly uniform conditions. The capsules + produced by the cross-fertilised flowers on the above thirty-four crossed + plants contained more seeds than did the capsules produced by the + self-fertilised flowers on the self-fertilised plants, in the proportion + of 100 to 85; so that in this respect crossing was beneficial. + </p> + <p> + 23. Primula sinensis. + </p> + <p> + The offspring of plants, some of which were legitimately and others + illegitimately fertilised with pollen from a distinct plant, were almost + exactly of the same height as the offspring of self-fertilised plants; but + the former with rare exceptions flowered before the latter. I have shown + in my paper on dimorphic plants that this species is commonly raised in + England from self-fertilised seed, and the plants from having been + cultivated in pots have been subjected to nearly uniform conditions. + Moreover, many of them are now varying and changing their character, so as + to become in a greater or less degree equal-styled, and in consequence + highly self-fertile. Therefore I believe that the cause of the crossed + plants not exceeding in height the self-fertilised is the same as in the + two previous cases of Pisum sativum and Canna. + </p> + <p> + 24, 25, 26. Nicotiana tabacum. + </p> + <p> + Four sets of measurements were made; in one, the self-fertilised plants + greatly exceeded in height the crossed, in two others they were + approximately equal to the crossed, and in the fourth were beaten by them; + but this latter case does not here concern us. The individual plants + differ in constitution, so that the descendants of some profit by their + parents having been intercrossed, whilst others do not. Taking all three + generations together, the twenty-seven crossed plants were in height to + the twenty-seven self-fertilised plants as 100 to 96. This excess of + height in the crossed plants, is so small compared with that displayed by + the offspring from the same mother-plants when crossed by a slightly + different variety, that we may suspect (as explained under Table 7/C) that + most of the individuals belonging to the variety which served as the + mother-plants in my experiments, had acquired a nearly similar + constitution, so as not to profit by being mutually intercrossed.] + </p> + <p> + Reviewing these twenty-six cases, in which the crossed plants either do + not exceed the self-fertilised by above five per cent in height, or are + inferior to them, we may conclude that much the greater number of the + cases do not form real exceptions to the rule,—that a cross between + two plants, unless these have been self-fertilised and exposed to nearly + the same conditions for many generations, gives a great advantage of some + kind to the offspring. Of the twenty-six cases, at least two, namely, + those of Adonis and Bartonia, may be wholly excluded, as the trials were + worthless from the extreme unhealthiness of the plants. Inn twelve other + cases (three trials with Eschscholtzia here included) the crossed plants + either were superior in height to the self-fertilised in all the other + generations excepting the one in question, or they showed their + superiority in some different manner, as in weight, fertility, or in + flowering first; or again, the cross-fertilised flowers on the + mother-plant were much more productive of seed than the self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Deducting these fourteen cases, there remain twelve in which the crossed + plants show no well-marked advantage over the self-fertilised. On the + other hand, we have seen that there are fifty-seven cases in which the + crossed plants exceed the self-fertilised in height by at least five per + cent, and generally in a much higher degree. But even in the twelve cases + just referred to, the want of any advantage on the crossed side is far + from certain: with Thunbergia the parent-plants were in an odd + semi-sterile condition, and the offspring grew very unequally; with + Hibiscus and Apium much too few plants were raised for the measurements to + be trusted, and the cross-fertilised flowers of Hibiscus produced rather + more seed than did the self-fertilised; with Vandellia the crossed plants + were a little taller and heavier than the self-fertilised, but as they + were less fertile the case must be left doubtful. Lastly, with Pisum, + Primula, the three generations of Canna, and the three of Nicotiana (which + together complete the twelve cases), a cross between two plants certainly + did no good or very little good to the offspring; but we have reason to + believe that this is the result of these plants having been + self-fertilised and cultivated under nearly uniform conditions for several + generations. The same result followed with the experimental plants of + Ipomoea and Mimulus, and to a certain extent with some other species, + which had been intentionally treated by me in this manner; yet we know + that these species in their normal condition profit greatly by being + intercrossed. There is, therefore, not a single case in Table 7/A which + affords decisive evidence against the rule that a cross between plants, + the progenitors of which have been subjected to somewhat diversified + conditions, is beneficial to the offspring. This is a surprising + conclusion, for from the analogy of domesticated animals it could not have + been anticipated, that the good effects of crossing or the evil effects of + self-fertilisation would have been perceptible until the plants had been + thus treated for several generations. + </p> + <p> + The results given in Table 7/A may be looked at under another point of + view. Hitherto each generation has been considered as a separate case, of + which there are eighty-three; and this no doubt is the more correct method + of comparing the crossed and self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + But in those cases in which plants of the same species were observed + during several generations, a general average of their heights in all the + generations together may be made; and such averages are given in Table + 7/A; for instance, under Ipomoea the general average for the plants of all + ten generations is as 100 for the crossed, to 77 for the self-fertilised + plants. This having been done in each case in which more than one + generation was raised, it is easy to calculate the average of the average + heights of the crossed and self-fertilised plants of all the species + included in Table 7/A. It should however be observed that as only a few + plants of some species, whilst a considerable number of others, were + measured, the value of the mean or average heights of the several species + is very different. Subject to this source of error, it may be worth while + to give the mean of the mean heights of the fifty-four species in Table + 7/A; and the result is, calling the mean of the mean heights of the + crossed plants 100, that of the self-fertilised plants is 87. But it is a + better plan to divide the fifty-four species into three groups, as was + done with the previously given eighty-three cases. The first group + consists of species of which the mean heights of the self-fertilised + plants are within five per cent of 100; so that the crossed and + self-fertilised plants are approximately equal; and of such species there + are twelve about which nothing need be said, the mean of the mean heights + of the self-fertilised being of course very nearly 100, or exactly 99.58. + The second group consists of the species, thirty-seven in number, of which + the mean heights of the crossed plants exceed that of the self-fertilised + plants by more than five per cent; and the mean of their mean heights is + to that of the self-fertilised plants as 100 to 78. The third group + consists of the species, only five in number, of which the mean heights of + the self-fertilised plants exceed that of the crossed by more than five + per cent; and here the mean of the mean heights of the crossed plants is + to that of the self-fertilised as 100 to 109. Therefore if we exclude the + species which are approximately equal, there are thirty-seven species in + which the mean of the mean heights of the crossed plants exceeds that of + the self-fertilised by twenty-two per cent; whereas there are only five + species in which the mean of the mean heights of the self-fertilised + plants exceeds that of the crossed, and this only by nine per cent. + </p> + <p> + The truth of the conclusion—that the good effects of a cross depend + on the plants having been subjected to different conditions or to their + belonging to different varieties, in both of which cases they would almost + certainly differ somewhat in constitution—is supported by a + comparison of the Tables 7/A and 7/C. The latter table gives the results + of crossing plants with a fresh stock or with a distinct variety; and the + superiority of the crossed offspring over the self-fertilised is here much + more general and much more strongly marked than in Table 7/A, in which + plants of the same stock were crossed. We have just seen that the mean of + the mean heights of the crossed plants of the whole fifty-four species in + Table 7/A is to that of the self-fertilised plants as 100 to 87; whereas + the mean of the mean heights of the plants crossed by a fresh stock is to + that of the self-fertilised in Table 7/C as 100 to 74. So that the crossed + plants beat the self-fertilised plants by thirteen per cent in Table 7/A, + and by twenty-six per cent, or double as much, in Table 7/C, which + includes the results of the cross by a fresh stock. + </p> + <h3> + TABLE 7/B. + </h3> + <p> + A few words must be added on the weights of the crossed plants of the same + stock, in comparison with the self-fertilised. Eleven cases are given in + Table 7/B, relating to eight species. The number of plants which were + weighed is shown in the two left columns, and their relative weights in + the right column, that of the crossed plants being taken as 100. A few + other cases have already been recorded in Table 7/C in reference to plants + crossed by a fresh stock. I regret that more trials of this kind were not + made, as the evidence of the superiority of the crossed over the + self-fertilised plants is thus shown in a more conclusive manner than by + their relative heights. But this plan was not thought of until a rather + late period, and there were difficulties either way, as the seeds had to + be collected when ripe, by which time the plants had often begun to + wither. In only one out of the eleven cases in Table 7/B, that of + Eschscholtzia, do the self-fertilised plants exceed the crossed in weight; + and we have already seen they are likewise superior to them in height, + though inferior in fertility, the whole advantage of a cross being here + confined to the reproductive system. With Vandellia the crossed plants + were a little heavier, as they were also a little taller than the + self-fertilised; but as a greater number of more productive capsules were + produced by the cleistogene flowers on the self-fertilised plants than by + those on the crossed plants, the case must be left, as remarked under + Table 7/A, altogether doubtful. The crossed and self-fertilised offspring + from a partially self-sterile plant of Reseda odorata were almost equal in + weight, though not in height. In the remaining eight cases, the crossed + plants show a wonderful superiority over the self-fertilised, being more + than double their weight, except in one case, and here the ratio is as + high as 100 to 67. The results thus deduced from the weights of the plants + confirm in a striking manner the former evidence of the beneficial effects + of a cross between two plants of the same stock; and in the few cases in + which plants derived from a cross with a fresh stock were weighed, the + results are similar or even more striking. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0008" id="link2HCH0008"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER VIII. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS IN + CONSTITUTIONAL VIGOUR AND IN OTHER RESPECTS. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Greater constitutional vigour of crossed plants. + The effects of great crowding. + Competition with other kinds of plants. + Self-fertilised plants more liable to premature death. + Crossed plants generally flower before the self-fertilised. + Negative effects of intercrossing flowers on the same plant. + Cases described. + Transmission of the good effects of a cross to later generations. + Effects of crossing plants of closely related parentage. + Uniform colour of the flowers on plants self-fertilised during several + generations and cultivated under similar conditions. +</pre> + <h3> + GREATER CONSTITUTIONAL VIGOUR OF CROSSED PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + As in almost all my experiments an equal number of crossed and + self-fertilised seeds, or more commonly seedlings just beginning to + sprout, were planted on the opposite sides of the same pots, they had to + compete with one another; and the greater height, weight, and fertility of + the crossed plants may be attributed to their possessing greater innate + constitutional vigour. Generally the plants of the two lots whilst very + young were of equal height; but afterwards the crossed gained insensibly + on their opponents, and this shows that they possessed some inherent + superiority, though not displayed at a very early period in life. There + were, however, some conspicuous exceptions to the rule of the two lots + being at first equal in height; thus the crossed seedlings of the broom + (Sarothamnus scoparius) when under three inches in height were more than + twice as tall as the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + After the crossed or the self-fertilised plants had once grown decidedly + taller than their opponents, a still increasing advantage would tend to + follow from the stronger plants robbing the weaker ones of nourishment and + overshadowing them. This was evidently the case with the crossed plants of + Viola tricolor, which ultimately quite overwhelmed the self-fertilised. + But that the crossed plants have an inherent superiority, independently of + competition, was sometimes well shown when both lots were planted + separately, not far distant from one another, in good soil in the open + ground. This was likewise shown in several cases, even with plants growing + in close competition with one another, by one of the self-fertilised + plants exceeding for a time its crossed opponent, which had been injured + by some accident or was at first sickly, but being ultimately conquered by + it. The plants of the eighth generation of Ipomoea were raised from small + seeds produced by unhealthy parents, and the self-fertilised plants grew + at first very rapidly, so that when the plants of both lots were about + three feet in height, the mean height of the crossed to that of the + self-fertilised was as 100 to 122; when they were about six feet high the + two lots were very nearly equal, but ultimately when between eight and + nine feet in height, the crossed plants asserted their usually + superiority, and were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 to 85. + </p> + <p> + The constitutional superiority of the crossed over the self-fertilised + plants was proved in another way in the third generation of Mimulus, by + self-fertilised seeds being sown on one side of a pot, and after a certain + interval of time crossed seeds on the opposite side. The self-fertilised + seedlings thus had (for I ascertained that the seeds germinated + simultaneously) a clear advantage over the crossed in the start for the + race. Nevertheless they were easily beaten (as may be seen under the head + of Mimulus) when the crossed seeds were sown two whole days after the + self-fertilised. But when the interval was four days, the two lots were + nearly equal throughout life. Even in this latter case the crossed plants + still possessed an inherent advantage, for after both lots had grown to + their full height they were cut down, and without being disturbed were + transferred to a larger pot, and when in the ensuing year they had again + grown to their full height they were measured; and now the tallest crossed + plants were to the tallest self-fertilised plants in height as 100 to 75, + and in fertility (i.e., by weight of seeds produced by an equal number of + capsules from both lots) as 100 to 34. + </p> + <p> + My usual method of proceeding, namely, to plant several pairs of crossed + and self-fertilised seeds in an equal state of germination on the opposite + sides of the same pots, so that the plants were subjected to moderately + severe mutual competition, was I think the best that could have been + followed, and was a fair test of what occurs in a state of nature. For + plants sown by nature generally come up crowded, and are almost always + exposed to very severe competition with one another and with other kinds + of plants. This latter consideration led me to make some trials, chiefly + but not exclusively with Ipomoea and Mimulus, by sowing crossed and + self-fertilised seeds on the opposite sides of large pots in which other + plants had long been growing, or in the midst of other plants out of + doors. The seedlings were thus subjected to very severe competition with + plants of other kinds; and in all such cases, the crossed seedlings + exhibited a great superiority in their power of growth over the + self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + After the germinating seedlings had been planted in pairs on the opposite + sides of several pots, the remaining seeds, whether or not in a state of + germination, were in most cases sown very thickly on the two sides of an + additional large pot; so that the seedlings came up extremely crowded, and + were subjected to extremely severe competition and unfavourable + conditions. In such cases the crossed plants almost invariably showed a + greater superiority over the self-fertilised, than did the plants which + grew in pairs in the pots. + </p> + <p> + Sometimes crossed and self-fertilised seeds were sown in separate rows in + the open ground, which was kept clear of weeds; so that the seedlings were + not subjected to any competition with other kinds of plants. Those however + in each row had to struggle with the adjoining ones in the same row. When + fully grown, several of the tallest plants in each row were selected, + measured, and compared. The result was in several cases (but not so + invariably as might have been expected) that the crossed plants did not + exceed in height the self-fertilised in nearly so great a degree as when + grown in pairs in the pots. Thus with the plants of Digitalis, which + competed together in pots, the crossed were to the self-fertilised in + height as 100 to 70; whilst those which were grown separately were only as + 100 to 85. Nearly the same result was observed with Brassica. With + Nicotiana the crossed were to the self-fertilised plants in height, when + grown extremely crowded together in pots, as 100 to 54; when grown much + less crowded in pots as 100 to 66, and when grow in the open ground, so as + to be subjected to but little competition, as 100 to 72. On the other hand + with Zea, there was a greater difference in height between the crossed and + self-fertilised plants growing out of doors, than between the pairs which + grew in pots in the hothouse; but this may be attributed to the + self-fertilised plants being more tender, so that they suffered more than + the crossed, when both lots were exposed to a cold and wet summer. Lastly, + with one out of two series of Reseda odorata, grown out of doors in rows, + as well as with Beta vulgaris, the crossed plants did not at all exceed + the self-fertilised in height, or exceeded them by a mere trifle. + </p> + <p> + The innate power of the crossed plants to resist unfavourable conditions + far better than did the self-fertilised plants, was shown on two occasions + in a curious manner, namely, with Iberis and in the third generation of + Petunia, by the great superiority in height of the crossed over the + self-fertilised seedlings, when both sets were grown under extremely + unfavourable conditions; whereas owing to special circumstances exactly + the reverse occurred with the plants raised from the same seeds and grown + in pairs in pots. A nearly analogous case was observed on two other + occasions with plants of the first generation of Nicotiana. + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants always withstood the injurious effects of being + suddenly removed into the open air after having been kept in the + greenhouse better than did the self-fertilised. On several occasions they + also resisted much better cold and intemperate weather. This was + manifestly the case with some crossed and self-fertilised plants of + Ipomoea, which were suddenly moved from the hothouse to the coldest part + of a cool greenhouse. The offspring of plants of the eighth + self-fertilised generation of Mimulus crossed by a fresh stock, survived a + frost which killed every single self-fertilised and intercrossed plant of + the same old stock. Nearly the same result followed with some crossed and + self-fertilised plants of Viola tricolor. Even the tips of the shoots of + the crossed plants of Sarothamnus scoparius were not touched by a very + severe winter; whereas all the self-fertilised plants were killed halfway + down to the ground, so that they were not able to flower during the next + summer. Young crossed seedlings of Nicotiana withstood a cold and wet + summer much better than the self-fertilised seedlings. I have met with + only one exception to the rule of crossed plants being hardier than the + self-fertilised: three long rows of Eschscholtzia plants, consisting of + crossed seedlings from a fresh stock, of intercrossed seedlings of the + same stock, and of self-fertilised ones, were left unprotected during a + severe winter, and all perished except two of the self-fertilised. But + this case is not so anomalous as it at first appears, for it should be + remembered that the self-fertilised plants of Eschscholtzia always grow + taller and are heavier than the crossed; the whole benefit of a cross with + this species being confined to increased fertility. + </p> + <p> + Independently of any external cause which could be detected, the + self-fertilised plants were more liable to premature death than were the + crossed; and this seems to me a curious fact. Whilst the seedlings were + very young, if one died its antagonist was pulled up and thrown away, and + I believe that many more of the self-fertilised died at this early age + than of the crossed; but I neglected to keep any record. With Beta + vulgaris, however, it is certain that a large number of the + self-fertilised seeds perished after germinating beneath the ground, + whereas the crossed seeds sown at the same time did not thus suffer. When + a plant died at a somewhat more advanced age the fact was recorded; and I + find in my notes that out of several hundred plants, only seven of the + crossed died, whilst of the self-fertilised at least twenty-nine were thus + lost, that is more than four times as many. Mr. Galton, after examining + some of my tables, remarks: “It is very evident that the columns with the + self-fertilised plants include the larger number of exceptionally small + plants;” and the frequent presence of such puny plants no doubt stands in + close relation with their liability to premature death. The + self-fertilised plants of Petunia completed their growth and began to + wither sooner than did the intercrossed plants; and these latter + considerably before the offspring from a cross with a fresh stock. + </p> + <h3> + PERIOD OF FLOWERING. + </h3> + <p> + In some cases, as with Digitalis, Dianthus, and Reseda, a larger number of + the crossed than of the self-fertilised plants threw up flower-stems; but + this probably was merely the result of their greater power of growth; for + in the first generation of Lobelia fulgens, in which the self-fertilised + plants greatly exceeded in height the crossed plants, some of the latter + failed to throw up flower-stems. With a large number of species, the + crossed plants exhibited a well-marked tendency to flower before the + self-fertilised ones growing in the same pots. It should however be + remarked that no record was kept of the flowering of many of the species; + and when a record was kept, the flowering of the first plant in each pot + was alone observed, although two or more pairs grew in the same pot. I + will now give three lists,—one of the species in which the first + plant that flowered was a crossed one,—a second in which the first + that flowered was a self-fertilised plant,—and a third of those + which flowered at the same time. + </p> + <p> + [SPECIES, OF WHICH THE FIRST PLANTS THAT FLOWERED WERE OF CROSSED + PARENTAGE. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + I record in my notes that in all ten generations many of the crossed + plants flowered before the self-fertilised; but no details were kept. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + Ten flowers on the crossed plants were fully expanded before one on the + self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus (Second and Third Generation). + </p> + <p> + In both these generations a crossed plant flowered before one of the + self-fertilised in all three pots. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus (Fifth Generation). + </p> + <p> + In all three pots a crossed plant flowered first; yet the self-fertilised + plants, which belonged to the new tall variety, were in height to the + crossed as 126 to 100. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + Plants derived from a cross with a fresh stock as well as the intercrossed + plants of the old stock, flowered before the self-fertilised plants in + nine out of the ten pots. + </p> + <p> + Salvia coccinea. + </p> + <p> + A crossed plant flowered before any one of the self-fertilised in all + three pots. + </p> + <p> + Origanum vulgare. + </p> + <p> + During two successive seasons several crossed plants flowered before the + self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Brassica oleracea (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + All the crossed plants growing in pots and in the open ground flowered + first. + </p> + <p> + Brassica oleracea (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + A crossed plant in three out of the four pots flowered before any one of + the self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Iberis umbellata. + </p> + <p> + In both pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica. + </p> + <p> + Plants derived from the Brazilian stock crossed by the English stock + flowered in five out of the nine pots first; in four of them a + self-fertilised plant flowered first; and not in one pot did an + intercrossed plant of the old stock flower first. + </p> + <p> + Viola tricolor. + </p> + <p> + A crossed plant in five out of the six pots flowered before any one of the + self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + In two large beds of plants, four of the crossed plants flowered before + any one of the self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + In both pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus (Third Generation). + </p> + <p> + In three out of the four pots a crossed plant flowered first; yet the + crossed were to the self-fertilised in height only as 100 to 99, but in + weight as 100 to 49. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus. + </p> + <p> + Plants derived from a cross with a fresh stock, and the intercrossed + plants of the old stock, both flowered before the self-fertilised in nine + out of the ten pots. + </p> + <p> + Hibiscus africanus. + </p> + <p> + In three out of the four pots a crossed plant flowered before any one of + the self-fertilised; yet the latter were to the crossed in height as 109 + to 100. + </p> + <p> + Tropaeolum minus. + </p> + <p> + A crossed plant flowered before any one of the self-fertilised in three + out of the four pots, and simultaneously in the fourth pot. + </p> + <p> + Limnanthes douglasii. + </p> + <p> + A crossed plant flowered before any one of the self-fertilised in four out + of the five pots. + </p> + <p> + Phaseolus multiflorus. + </p> + <p> + In both pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Specularia speculum. + </p> + <p> + In all four pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia ramosa (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + In all four pots a crossed plant flowered before any one of the + self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia ramosa (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + In all four pots a crossed plant flowered some days before any one of the + self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Nemophila insignis. + </p> + <p> + In four out of the five pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Borago officinalis. + </p> + <p> + In both pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + In all three pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum. + </p> + <p> + A plant derived from a cross with a fresh stock flowered before any one of + the self-fertilised plants of the fourth generation, in fifteen out of the + sixteen pots. + </p> + <p> + Cyclamen persicum. + </p> + <p> + During two successive seasons a crossed plant flowered some weeks before + any one of the self-fertilised in all four pots. + </p> + <p> + Primula veris (equal-styled var.) + </p> + <p> + In all three pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Primula sinensis. + </p> + <p> + In all four pots plants derived from an illegitimate cross between + distinct plants flowered before any one of the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + Primula sinensis. + </p> + <p> + A legitimately crossed plant flowered before any one of the + self-fertilised plants in seven out of the eight pots. + </p> + <p> + Fagopyrum esculentum. + </p> + <p> + A legitimately crossed plant flowered from one to two days before any one + of the self-fertilised plants in all three pots. + </p> + <p> + Zea mays. + </p> + <p> + In all four pots a crossed plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Phalaris canariensis. + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants flowered before the self-fertilised in the open ground, + but simultaneously in the pots. + </p> + <p> + SPECIES OF WHICH THE FIRST PLANTS THAT FLOWERED WERE OF SELF-FERTILISED + PARENTAGE. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants were at first taller than the self-fertilised, but on + their second growth during the following year the self-fertilised exceeded + the crossed in height, and now they flowered first in three out of the + four pots. + </p> + <p> + Lupinus luteus. + </p> + <p> + Although the crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 + to 82; yet in all three pots the self-fertilised plants flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Clarkia elegans. + </p> + <p> + Although the crossed plants were, as in the last case, to the + self-fertilised in height as 100 to 82, yet in the two pots the + self-fertilised flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia fulgens (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height only as 100 to + 127, and the latter flowered much before the crossed. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea (Third Generation). + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 to 131, + and in three out of the four pots a self-fertilised plant flowered first; + in the fourth pot simultaneously. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea (Fourth generation). + </p> + <p> + Although the crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 + to 69, yet in three out of the five pots a self-fertilised plant flowered + first; in the fourth pot simultaneously, and only in the fifth did a + crossed plant flower first. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum (First Generation). + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height only as 100 to + 178, and a self-fertilised plant flowered first in all four pots. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum (Third Generation). + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 to 101, + and in four out of the five pots a self-fertilised plant flowered first. + </p> + <p> + Canna warscewiczi. + </p> + <p> + In the three generations taken together the crossed were to the + self-fertilised in height as 100 to 101; in the first generation the + self-fertilised plants showed some tendency to flower first, and in the + third generation they flowered first in nine out of the twelve pots. + </p> + <p> + SPECIES IN WHICH THE CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS FLOWERED ALMOST + SIMULTANEOUSLY. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus (Sixth Generation). + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants were inferior in height and vigour to the + self-fertilised plants, which all belonged to the new white-flowered tall + variety, yet in only half the pots did the self-fertilised plants flower + first, and in the other half the crossed plants. + </p> + <p> + Viscaria oculata. + </p> + <p> + The crossed plants were only a little taller than the self-fertilised + (namely, as 100 to 97), but considerably more fertile, yet both lots + flowered almost simultaneously. + </p> + <p> + Lathyrus odoratus (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + Although the crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 + to 88, yet there was no marked difference in their period of flowering. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia fulgens (Second Generation). + </p> + <p> + Although the crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 + to 91, yet they flowered simultaneously. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum (Third Generation). + </p> + <p> + Although the crossed plants were to the self-fertilised in height as 100 + to 83, yet in half the pots a self-fertilised plant flowered first, and in + the other half a crossed plant.] + </p> + <p> + These three lists include fifty-eight cases, in which the period of + flowering of the crossed and self-fertilised plants was recorded. In + forty-four of them a crossed plant flowered first either in a majority of + the pots or in all; in nine instances a self-fertilised plant flowered + first, and in five the two lots flowered simultaneously. One of the most + striking cases is that of Cyclamen, in which the crossed plants flowered + some weeks before the self-fertilised in all four pots during two seasons. + In the second generation of Lobelia ramosa, a crossed plant flowered in + all four pots some days before any one of the self-fertilised. Plants + derived from a cross with a fresh stock generally showed a very strongly + marked tendency to flower before the self-fertilised and the intercrossed + plants of the old stock; all three lots growing in the same pots. Thus + with Mimulus and Dianthus, in only one pot out of ten, and in Nicotiana in + only one pot out of sixteen, did a self-fertilised plant flower before the + plants of the two crossed kinds,—these latter flowering almost + simultaneously. + </p> + <p> + A consideration of the two first lists, especially of the second one, + shows that a tendency to flower first is generally connected with greater + power of growth, that is, with greater height. But there are some + remarkable exceptions to this rule, proving that some other cause comes + into play. Thus the crossed plants both of Lupinus luteus and Clarkia + elegans were to the self-fertilised plants in height as 100 to 82, and yet + the latter flowered first. In the third generation of Nicotiana, and in + all three generations of Canna, the crossed and self-fertilised plants + were of nearly equal height, yet the self-fertilised tended to flower + first. On the other hand, with Primula sinensis, plants raised from a + cross between two distinct individuals, whether these were legitimately or + illegitimately crossed, flowered before the illegitimately self-fertilised + plants, although all the plants were of nearly equal height in both cases. + So it was with respect to height and flowering with Phaseolus, Specularia, + and Borago. The crossed plants of Hibiscus were inferior in height to the + self-fertilised, in the ratio of 100 to 109, and yet they flowered before + the self-fertilised in three out of the four pots. On the whole, there can + be no doubt that the crossed plants exhibit a tendency to flower before + the self-fertilised, almost though not quite so strongly marked as to grow + to a greater height, to weigh more, and to be more fertile. + </p> + <p> + A few other cases not included in the above three lists deserve notice. In + all three pots of Viola tricolor, naturally crossed plants the offspring + of crossed plants flowered before naturally crossed plants the offspring + of self-fertilised plants. Flowers on two plants, both of self-fertilised + parentage, of the sixth generation of Mimulus luteus were intercrossed, + and other flowers on the same plants were fertilised with their own + pollen; intercrossed seedlings and seedlings of the seventh + self-fertilised generation were thus raised, and the latter flowered + before the intercrossed in three out of the five pots. Flowers on a plant + both of Mimulus luteus and of Ipomoea purpurea were crossed with pollen + from other flowers on the same plant, and other flowers were fertilised + with their own pollen; intercrossed seedlings of this peculiar kind, and + others strictly self-fertilised being thus raised. In the case of the + Mimulus the self-fertilised plants flowered first in seven out of the + eight pots, and in the case of the Ipomoea in eight out of the ten pots; + so that an intercross between the flowers on the same plant was very far + from giving to the offspring thus raised, any advantage over the strictly + self-fertilised plants in their period of flowering. + </p> + <h3> + EFFECTS OF CROSSING FLOWERS ON THE SAME PLANT. + </h3> + <p> + In the discussion on the results of a cross with a fresh stock, given + under Table 7/C in the last chapter, it was shown that the mere act of + crossing by itself does no good; but that the advantages thus derived + depend on the plants which are crossed, either consisting of distinct + varieties which will almost certainly differ somewhat in constitution, or + on the progenitors of the plants which are crossed, though identical in + every external character, having been subjected to somewhat different + conditions and having thus acquired some slight difference in + constitution. All the flowers produced by the same plant have been + developed from the same seed; those which expand at the same time have + been exposed to exactly the same climatic influences; and the stems have + all been nourished by the same roots. Therefore in accordance with the + conclusion just referred to, no good ought to result from crossing flowers + on the same plant. (8/1. It is, however, possible that the stamens which + differ in length or construction in the same flower may produce pollen + differing in nature, and in this manner a cross might be made effective + between the several flowers on the same plant. Mr. Macnab states in a + communication to M. Verlot ‘La Production des Varietes’ 1865 page 42, that + seedlings raised from the shorter and longer stamens of rhododendron + differ in character; but the shorter stamens apparently are becoming + rudimentary, and the seedlings are dwarfs, so that the result may be + simply due to a want of fertilising power in the pollen, as in the case of + the dwarfed plants of Mirabilis raised by Naudin by the use of too few + pollen-grains. Analogous statements have been made with respect to the + stamens of Pelargonium. With some of the Melastomaceae, seedlings raised + by me from flowers fertilised by pollen from the shorter stamens, + certainly differed in appearance from those raised from the longer + stamens, with differently coloured anthers; but here, again, there is some + reason for believing that the shorter stamens are tending towards + abortion. In the very different case of trimorphic heterostyled plants, + the two sets of stamens in the same flower have widely different + fertilising powers.) In opposition to this conclusion is the fact that a + bud is in one sense a distinct individual, and is capable of occasionally + or even not rarely assuming new external characters, as well as new + constitutional peculiarities. Plants raised from buds which have thus + varied may be propagated for a great length of time by grafts, cuttings, + etc., and sometimes even by seminal generation. (8/2. I have given + numerous cases of such bud-variations in my ‘Variation of Animals and + Plants under Domestication’ chapter 11 2nd edition volume 1 page 448.) + There exist also numerous species in which the flowers on the same plant + differ from one another,—as in the sexual organs of monoecious and + polygamous plants,—in the structure of the circumferential flowers + in many Compositae, Umbelliferae, etc.,—in the structure of the + central flower in some plants,—in the two kinds of flowers produced + by cleistogene species,—and in several other such cases. These + instances clearly prove that the flowers on the same plant have often + varied independently of one another in many important respects, such + variations having been fixed, like those on distinct plants during the + development of species. + </p> + <p> + It was therefore necessary to ascertain by experiment what would be the + effect of intercrossing flowers on the same plant, in comparison with + fertilising them with their own pollen or crossing them with pollen from a + distinct plant. Trials were carefully made on five genera belonging to + four families; and in only one case, namely, Digitalis, did the offspring + from a cross between the flowers on the same plant receive any benefit, + and the benefit here was small compared with that derived from a cross + between distinct plants. In the chapter on Fertility, when we consider the + effects of cross-fertilisation and self-fertilisation on the + productiveness of the parent-plants we shall arrive at nearly the same + result, namely, that a cross between the flowers on the same plant does + not at all increase the number of the seeds, or only occasionally and to a + slight degree. I will now give an abstract of the results of the five + trials which were made. + </p> + <p> + 1. Digitalis purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Seedlings raised from intercrossed flowers on the same plant, and others + from flowers fertilised with their own pollen, were grown in the usual + manner in competition with one another on the opposite sides of ten pots. + In this and the four following cases, the details may be found under the + head of each species. In eight pots, in which the plants did not grow much + crowded, the flower-stems on sixteen intercrossed plants were in height to + those on sixteen self-fertilised plants, as 100 to 94. In the two other + pots on which the plants grew much crowded, the flower-stems on nine + intercrossed plants were in height to those on nine self-fertilised + plants, as 100 to 90. That the intercrossed plants in these two latter + pots had a real advantage over their self-fertilised opponents, was well + shown by their relative weights when cut down, which was as 100 to 78. The + mean height of the flower-stems on the twenty-five intercrossed plants in + the ten pots taken together, was to that of the flower-stems on the + twenty-five self-fertilised plants, as 100 to 92. Thus the intercrossed + plants were certainly superior to the self-fertilised in some degree; but + their superiority was small compared with that of the offspring from a + cross between distinct plants over the self-fertilised, this being in the + ratio of 100 to 70 in height. Nor does this latter ratio show at all + fairly the great superiority of the plants derived from a cross between + distinct individuals over the self-fertilised, as the former produced more + than twice as many flower-stems as the latter, and were much less liable + to premature death. + </p> + <p> + 2. Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + Thirty-one intercrossed plants raised from a cross between flowers on the + same plants were grown in ten pots in competition with the same number of + self-fertilised plants, and the former were to the latter in height as 100 + to 105. So that the self-fertilised plants were a little taller than the + intercrossed; and in eight out of the ten pots a self-fertilised plant + flowered before any one of the crossed plants in the same pots. The plants + which were not greatly crowded in nine of the pots (and these offer the + fairest standard of comparison) were cut down and weighed; and the weight + of the twenty-seven intercrossed plants was to that of the twenty-seven + self-fertilised as 100 to 124; so that by this test the superiority of the + self-fertilised was strongly marked. To this subject of the superiority of + the self-fertilised plants in certain cases, I shall have to recur in a + future chapter. If we now turn to the offspring from a cross between + distinct plants when put into competition with self-fertilised plants, we + find that the mean height of seventy-three such crossed plants, in the + course of ten generations, was to that of the same number of + self-fertilised plants as 100 to 77; and in the case of the plants of the + tenth generation in weight as 100 to 44. Thus the contrast between the + effects of crossing flowers on the same plant, and of crossing flowers on + distinct plants, is wonderfully great. + </p> + <p> + 3. Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + Twenty-two plants raised by crossing flowers on the same plant were grown + in competition with the same number of self-fertilised plants; and the + former were to the latter in height as 100 to 105, and in weight as 100 to + 103. Moreover, in seven out of the eight pots a self-fertilised plant + flowered before any of the intercrossed plants. So that here again the + self-fertilised exhibit a slight superiority over the intercrossed plants. + For the sake of comparison, I may add that seedlings raised during three + generations from a cross between distinct plants were to the + self-fertilised plants in height as 100 to 65. + </p> + <p> + 4. Pelargonium zonale. + </p> + <p> + Two plants growing in separate pots, which had been propagated by cuttings + from the same plant, and therefore formed in fact parts of the same + individual, were intercrossed, and other flowers on one of these plants + were self-fertilised; but the seedlings obtained by the two processes did + not differ in height. When, on the other hand, flowers on one of the above + plants were crossed with pollen taken from a distinct seedling, and other + flowers were self-fertilised, the crossed offspring thus obtained were to + the self-fertilised in height as 100 to 74. + </p> + <p> + 5. Origanum vulgare. + </p> + <p> + A plant which had been long cultivated in my kitchen garden, had spread by + stolons so as to form a large bed or clump. Seedlings raised by + intercrossing flowers on these plants, which strictly consisted of the + same plant, and other seedlings raised from self-fertilised flowers, were + carefully compared from their earliest youth to maturity; and they did not + differ at all in height or in constitutional vigour. Some flowers on these + seedlings were then crossed with pollen taken from a distinct seedling, + and other flowers were self-fertilised; two fresh lots of seedlings being + thus raised, which were the grandchildren of the plant that had spread by + stolons and formed a large clump in my garden. These differed much in + height, the crossed plants being to the self-fertilised as 100 to 86. They + differed, also, to a wonderful degree in constitutional vigour. The + crossed plants flowered first, and produced exactly twice as many + flower-stems; and they afterwards increased by stolons to such an extent + as almost to overwhelm the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + Reviewing these five cases, we see that in four of them, the effect of a + cross between flowers on the same plant (even on offsets of the same plant + growing on separate roots, as with the Pelargonium and Origanum) does not + differ from that of the strictest self-fertilisation. Indeed, in two of + the cases the self-fertilised plants were superior to such intercrossed + plants. With Digitalis a cross between the flowers on the same plant + certainly did do some good, yet very slight compared with that from a + cross between distinct plants. On the whole the results here arrived at, + if we bear in mind that the flower-buds are to a certain extent distinct + individuals and occasionally vary independently of one another, agree well + with our general conclusion, that the advantages of a cross depend on the + progenitors of the crossed plants possessing somewhat different + constitutions, either from having been exposed to different conditions, or + to their having varied from unknown causes in a manner which we in our + ignorance are forced to speak of as spontaneous. Hereafter I shall have to + recur to this subject of the inefficiency of a cross between the flowers + on the same plant, when we consider the part which insects play in the + cross-fertilisation of flowers. + </p> + <p> + ON THE TRANSMISSION OF THE GOOD EFFECTS FROM A CROSS AND OF THE EVIL + EFFECTS FROM SELF-FERTILISATION. + </p> + <p> + We have seen that seedlings from a cross between distinct plants almost + always exceed their self-fertilised opponents in height, weight, and + constitutional vigour, and, as will hereafter be shown, often in + fertility. To ascertain whether this superiority would be transmitted + beyond the first generation, seedlings were raised on three occasions from + crossed and self-fertilised plants, both sets being fertilised in the same + manner, and therefore not as in the many cases given in Tables 7/A, 7/B, + 7/C, in which the crossed plants were again crossed and the + self-fertilised again self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Firstly, seedlings were raised from self-fertilised seeds produced under a + net by crossed and self-fertilised plants of Nemophila insignis; and the + latter were to the former in height as 133 to 100. But these seedlings + became very unhealthy early in life, and grew so unequally that some of + them in both lots were five times as tall as the others. Therefore this + experiment was quite worthless; but I have felt bound to give it, as + opposed to my general conclusion. I should state that in this and the two + following trials, both sets of plants were grown on the opposite sides of + the same pots, and treated in all respects alike. The details of the + experiments may be found under the head of each species. + </p> + <p> + Secondly, a crossed and a self-fertilised plant of Heartsease (Viola + tricolor) grew near together in the open ground and near to other plants + of heartsease; and as both produced an abundance of very fine capsules, + the flowers on both were certainly cross-fertilised by insects. Seeds were + collected from both plants, and seedlings raised from them. Those from the + crossed plants flowered in all three pots before those from the + self-fertilised plants; and when fully grown the former were to the latter + in height as 100 to 82. As both sets of plants were the product of + cross-fertilisation, the difference in their growth and period of + flowering was clearly due to their parents having been of crossed and + self-fertilised parentage; and it is equally clear that they transmitted + different constitutional powers to their offspring, the grandchildren of + the plants which were originally crossed and self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Thirdly, the Sweet Pea (Lathyrus odoratus) habitually fertilises itself in + this country. As I possessed plants, the parents and grandparents of which + had been artificially crossed and other plants descended from the same + parents which had been self-fertilised for many previous generations, + these two lots of plants were allowed to fertilise themselves under a net, + and their self-fertilised seeds saved. The seedlings thus raised were + grown in competition with each other in the usual manner, and differed in + their powers of growth. Those from the self-fertilised plants which had + been crossed during the two previous generations were to those from the + plants self-fertilised during many previous generations in height as 100 + to 90. These two lots of seeds were likewise tried by being sown under + very unfavourable conditions in poor exhausted soil, and the plants whose + grandparents and great-grandparents had been crossed showed in an + unmistakable manner their superior constitutional vigour. In this case, as + in that of the heartsease, there could be no doubt that the advantage + derived from a cross between two plants was not confined to the offspring + of the first generation. That constitutional vigour due to cross-parentage + is transmitted for many generations may also be inferred as highly + probable, from some of Andrew Knight’s varieties of the common pea, which + were raised by crossing distinct varieties, after which time they no doubt + fertilised themselves in each succeeding generation. These varieties + lasted for upwards of sixty years, “but their glory is now departed.” + (8/3. See the evidence on this head in my ‘Variation under Domestication’ + chapter 9 volume 1 2nd edition page 397.) On the other hand, most of the + varieties of the common pea, which there is no reason to suppose owe their + origin to a cross, have had a much shorter existence. Some also of Mr. + Laxton’s varieties produced by artificial crosses have retained their + astonishing vigour and luxuriance for a considerable number of + generations; but as Mr. Laxton informs me, his experience does not extend + beyond twelve generations, within which period he has never perceived any + diminution of vigour in his plants. + </p> + <p> + An allied point may be here noticed. As the force of inheritance is strong + with plants (of which abundant evidence could be given), it is almost + certain that seedlings from the same capsule or from the same plant would + tend to inherit nearly the same constitution; and as the advantage from a + cross depends on the plants which are crossed differing somewhat in + constitution, it may be inferred as probable that under similar conditions + a cross between the nearest relations would not benefit the offspring so + much as one between non-related plants. In support of this conclusion we + have some evidence, as Fritz Muller has shown by his valuable experiments + on hybrid Abutilons, that the union of brothers and sisters, parents and + children, and of other near relations is highly injurious to the fertility + of the offspring. In one case, moreover, seedlings from such near + relations possessed very weak constitutions. (8/4. ‘Jenaische Zeitschrift + fur Naturw.’ B. 7 pages 22 and 45 1872 and 1873 pages 441-450.) This same + observer also found three plants of a Bignonia growing near together. + (8/5. ‘Botanische Zeitung’ 1868 page 626.) He fertilised twenty-nine + flowers on one of them with their own pollen, and they did not set a + single capsule. Thirty flowers were then fertilised with pollen from a + distinct plant, one of the three growing together, and they yielded only + two capsules. Lastly, five flowers were fertilised with pollen from a + fourth plant growing at a distance, and all five produced capsules. It + seems therefore probable, as Fritz Muller suggests, that the three plants + growing near together were seedlings from the same parent, and that from + being closely related they had little power of fertilising one another. + (8/6. Some remarkable cases are given in my ‘Variation under + Domestication’ chapter 17 2nd edition volume 2 page 121, of hybrids of + Gladiolus and Cistus, any one of which could be fertilised by pollen from + any other, but not by its own pollen.) + </p> + <p> + Lastly, the fact of the intercrossed plants in Table 7/A not exceeding in + height the self-fertilised plants in a greater and greater degree in the + later generations, is probably the result of their having become more and + more closely inter-related. + </p> + <p> + UNIFORM COLOUR OF THE FLOWERS ON PLANTS, SELF-FERTILISED AND GROWN UNDER + SIMILAR CONDITIONS FOR SEVERAL GENERATIONS. + </p> + <p> + At the commencement of my experiments, the parent-plants of Mimulus + luteus, Ipomoea purpurea, Dianthus caryophyllus, and Petunia violacea, + raised from purchased seeds, varied greatly in the colour of their + flowers. This occurs with many plants which have been long cultivated as + an ornament for the flower-garden, and which have been propagated by + seeds. The colour of the flowers was a point to which I did not at first + in the least attend, and no selection whatever was practised. + Nevertheless, the flowers produced by the self-fertilised plants of the + above four species became absolutely uniform in tint, or very nearly so, + after they had been grown for some generations under closely similar + conditions. The intercrossed plants, which were more or less closely + inter-related in the later generations, and which had been likewise + cultivated all the time under similar conditions, became more uniform in + the colour of their flowers than were the original parent-plants, but much + less so than the self-fertilised plants. When self-fertilised plants of + one of the later generations were crossed with a fresh stock, and + seedlings thus raised, these presented a wonderful contrast in the + diversified tints of their flowers compared with those of the + self-fertilised seedlings. As such cases of flowers becoming uniformly + coloured without any aid from selection seem to me curious, I will give a + full abstract of my observations. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus. + </p> + <p> + A tall variety, bearing large, almost white flowers blotched with crimson, + appeared amongst the intercrossed and self-fertilised plants of the third + and fourth generations. This variety increased so rapidly, that in the + sixth generation of self-fertilised plants every single one consisted of + it. So it was with all the many plants which were raised, up to the last + or ninth self-fertilised generation. Although this variety first appeared + amongst the intercrossed plants, yet from their offspring being + intercrossed in each succeeding generation, it never prevailed amongst + them; and the flowers on the several intercrossed plants of the ninth + generation differed considerably in colour. On the other hand, the + uniformity in colour of the flowers on the plants of all the later + self-fertilised generations was quite surprising; on a casual inspection + they might have been said to be quite alike, but the crimson blotches were + not of exactly the same shape, or in exactly the same position. Both my + gardener and myself believe that this variety did not appear amongst the + parent-plants, raised from purchased seeds, but from its appearance + amongst both the crossed and self-fertilised plants of the third and + fourth generations; and from what I have seen of the variation of this + species on other occasions, it is probable that it would occasionally + appear under any circumstances. We learn, however, from the present case + that under the peculiar conditions to which my plants were subjected, this + particular variety, remarkable for its colouring, largeness of the + corolla, and increased height of the whole plant, prevailed in the sixth + and all the succeeding self-fertilised generations to the complete + exclusion of every other variety. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea. + </p> + <p> + My attention was first drawn to the present subject by observing that the + flowers on all the plants of the seventh self-fertilised generation were + of a uniform, remarkably rich, dark purple tint. The many plants which + were raised during the three succeeding generations, up to the last or + tenth, all produced flowers coloured in the same manner. They were + absolutely uniform in tint, like those of a constant species living in a + state of nature; and the self-fertilised plants might have been + distinguished with certainty, as my gardener remarked, without the aid of + labels, from the intercrossed plants of the later generations. These, + however, had more uniformly coloured flowers than those which were first + raised from the purchased seeds. This dark purple variety did not appear, + as far as my gardener and myself could recollect, before the fifth or + sixth self-fertilised generation. However this may have been, it became, + through continued self-fertilisation and the cultivation of the plants + under uniform conditions, perfectly constant, to the exclusion of every + other variety. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus. + </p> + <p> + The self-fertilised plants of the third generation all bore flowers of + exactly the same pale rose-colour; and in this respect they differed quite + remarkably from the plants growing in a large bed close by and raised from + seeds purchased from the same nursery garden. In this case it is not + improbable that some of the parent-plants which were first self-fertilised + may have borne flowers thus coloured; but as several plants were + self-fertilised in the first generation, it is extremely improbable that + all bore flowers of exactly the same tint as those of the self-fertilised + plants of the third generation. The intercrossed plants of the third + generation likewise produced flowers almost, though not quite so uniform + in tint as those of the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea. + </p> + <p> + In this case I happened to record in my notes that the flowers on the + parent-plant which was first self-fertilised were of a “dingy purple + colour.” In the fifth self-fertilised generation, every one of the + twenty-one self-fertilised plants growing in pots, and all the many plants + in a long row out of doors, produced flowers of absolutely the same tint, + namely, of a dull, rather peculiar and ugly flesh colour; therefore, + considerably unlike those on the parent-plant. I believe that this change + of colour supervened quite gradually; but I kept no record, as the point + did not interest me until I was struck with the uniform tint of the + flowers on the self-fertilised plants of the fifth generation. The flowers + on the intercrossed plants of the corresponding generation were mostly of + the same dull flesh colour, but not nearly so uniform as those on the + self-fertilised plants, some few being very pale, almost white. The + self-fertilised plants which grew in a long row in the open ground were + also remarkable for their uniformity in height, as were the intercrossed + plants in a less degree, both lots being compared with a large number of + plants raised at the same time under similar conditions from the + self-fertilised plants of the fourth generation crossed by a fresh stock. + I regret that I did not attend to the uniformity in height of the + self-fertilised seedlings in the later generations of the other species. + </p> + <p> + These few cases seem to me to possess much interest. We learn from them + that new and slight shades of colour may be quickly and firmly fixed, + independently of any selection, if the conditions are kept as nearly + uniform as is possible, and no intercrossing be permitted. With Mimulus, + not only a grotesque style of colouring, but a larger corolla and + increased height of the whole plant were thus fixed; whereas with most + plants which have been long cultivated for the flower-garden, no character + is more variable than that of colour, excepting perhaps that of height. + From the consideration of these cases we may infer that the variability of + cultivated plants in the above respects is due, firstly, to their being + subjected to somewhat diversified conditions, and, secondly, to their + being often intercrossed, as would follow from the free access of insects. + I do not see how this inference can be avoided, as when the above plants + were cultivated for several generations under closely similar conditions, + and were intercrossed in each generation, the colour of their flowers + tended in some degree to change and to become uniform. When no + intercrossing with other plants of the same stock was allowed,—that + is, when the flowers were fertilised with their own pollen in each + generation—their colour in the later generations became as uniform + as that of plants growing in a state of nature, accompanied at least in + one instance by much uniformity in the height of the plants. But in saying + that the diversified tints of the flowers on cultivated plants treated in + the ordinary manner are due to differences in the soil, climate, etc., to + which they are exposed, I do not wish to imply that such variations are + caused by these agencies in any more direct manner than that in which the + most diversified illnesses, as colds, inflammation of the lungs or pleura, + rheumatism, etc., may be said to be caused by exposure to cold. In both + cases the constitution of the being which is acted on is of preponderant + importance. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0009" id="link2HCH0009"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER IX. THE EFFECTS OF CROSS-FERTILISATION AND SELF-FERTILISATION ON + THE PRODUCTION OF SEEDS. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Fertility of plants of crossed and self-fertilised parentage, both lots + being fertilised in the same manner. + Fertility of the parent-plants when first crossed and self-fertilised, + and of their crossed and self-fertilised offspring when again crossed + and self-fertilised. + Comparison of the fertility of flowers fertilised with their own pollen + and with that from other flowers on the same plant. + Self-sterile plants. + Causes of self-sterility. + The appearance of highly self-fertile varieties. + Self-fertilisation apparently in some respects beneficial, independently + of the assured production of seeds. + Relative weights and rates of germination of seeds from crossed and + self-fertilised flowers. +</pre> + <p> + The present chapter is devoted to the Fertility of plants, as influenced + by cross-fertilisation and self-fertilisation. The subject consists of two + distinct branches; firstly, the relative productiveness or fertility of + flowers crossed with pollen from a distinct plant and with their own + pollen, as shown by the proportional number of capsules which they + produce, together with the number of the contained seeds. Secondly, the + degree of innate fertility or sterility of the seedlings raised from + crossed and self-fertilised seeds; such seedlings being of the same age, + grown under the same conditions, and fertilised in the same manner. These + two branches of the subject correspond with the two which have to be + considered by any one treating of hybrid plants; namely, in the first + place the comparative productiveness of a species when fertilised with + pollen from a distinct species and with its own pollen; and in the second + place, the fertility of its hybrid offspring. These two classes of cases + do not always run parallel; thus some plants, as Gartner has shown, can be + crossed with great ease, but yield excessively sterile hybrids; while + others are crossed with extreme difficulty, but yield fairly fertile + hybrids. + </p> + <p> + The natural order to follow in this chapter would have been first to + consider the effects on the fertility of the parent-plants of crossing + them, and of fertilising them with their own pollen; but as we have + discussed in the two last chapters the relative height, weight, and + constitutional vigour of crossed and self-fertilised plants—that is, + of plants raised from crossed and self-fertilised seeds—it will be + convenient here first to consider their relative fertility. The cases + observed by me are given in Table 9/D, in which plants of crossed and + self-fertilised parentage were left to fertilise themselves, being either + crossed by insects or spontaneously self-fertilised. It should be observed + that the results cannot be considered as fully trustworthy, for the + fertility of a plant is a most variable element, depending on its age, + health, nature of the soil, amount of water given, and temperature to + which it is exposed. The number of the capsules produced and the number of + the contained seeds, ought to have been ascertained on a large number of + crossed and self-fertilised plants of the same age and treated in every + respect alike. In these two latter respects my observations may be + trusted, but a sufficient number of capsules were counted only in a few + instances. The fertility, or as it may perhaps better be called the + productiveness, of a plant depends on the number of capsules produced, and + on the number of seeds which these contain. But from various causes, + chiefly from the want of time, I was often compelled to rely on the number + of the capsules alone. Nevertheless, in the more interesting cases, the + seeds were also counted or weighed. The average number of seeds per + capsule is a more valuable criterion of fertility than the number of + capsules produced. This latter circumstance depends partly on the size of + the plant; and we know that crossed plants are generally taller and + heavier than the self-fertilised; but the difference in this respect is + rarely sufficient to account for the difference in the number of the + capsules produced. It need hardly be added that in Table 9/D the same + number of crossed and self-fertilised plants are always compared. Subject + to the foregoing sources of doubt I will now give the table, in which the + parentage of the plants experimented on, and the manner of determining + their fertility are explained. Fuller details may be found in the previous + part of this work, under the head of each species. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 9/D.—RELATIVE FERTILITY OF PLANTS OF CROSSED AND + SELF-FERTILISED PARENTAGE, BOTH SETS BEING FERTILISED IN THE SAME MANNER. + FERTILITY JUDGED OF BY VARIOUS STANDARDS. THAT OF THE CROSSED PLANTS TAKEN + AS 100. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Name of plant and feature observed. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: x, in the expression, as 100 to x. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—first generation: seeds per capsule on crossed and + self-fertilised plants, not growing much crowded, spontaneously + self-fertilised under a net, in number: 99. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—seeds per capsule on crossed and self-fertilised + plants from the same parents as in the last case, but growing much + crowded, spontaneously self-fertilised under a net, in number: 93. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—productiveness of the same plants, as judged by the + number of capsules produced, and average number of seeds per capsule: 45. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—third generation: seeds per capsule on crossed and + self-fertilised plants, spontaneously self-fertilised under a net, in + number: 94. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—productiveness of the same plants, as judged by the + number of capsules produced, and the average number of seeds per capsule: + 35. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—fifth generation: seeds per capsule on crossed and + self-fertilised plants, left uncovered in the hothouse, and spontaneously + fertilised: 89. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—ninth generation: number of capsules on crossed + plants to those on self-fertilised plants, spontaneously self-fertilised + under a net: 26. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus—an equal number of capsules on plants descended from + self-fertilised plants of the 8th generation crossed by a fresh stock, and + on plants of the 9th self-fertilised generation, both sets having been + left uncovered and spontaneously fertilised, contained seeds, by weight: + 30. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus—productiveness of the same plants, as judged by the + number of capsules produced, and the average weight of seeds per capsule: + 3. + </p> + <p> + Vandellia nummularifolia—seeds per capsule from cleistogene flowers + on the crossed and self-fertilised plants, in number: 106. + </p> + <p> + Salvia coccinea—crossed plants, compared with self-fertilised + plants, produced flowers, in number: 57. + </p> + <p> + Iberis umbellata—plants left uncovered in greenhouse; intercrossed + plants of the 3rd generation, compared with self-fertilised plants of the + 3rd generation, yielded seeds, in number: 75. + </p> + <p> + Iberis umbellata—plants from a cross between two varieties, compared + with self-fertilised plants of the 3rd generation, yielded seeds, by + weight : 75. + </p> + <p> + Papaver vagum—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left uncovered, + produced capsules, in number: 99. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica—Brazilian stock; plants left uncovered and + cross-fertilised by bees; capsules on intercrossed plants of the 2nd + generation, compared with capsules on self-fertilised plants of 2nd + generation, contained seeds, in number: 78. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica—productiveness of the same plants, as + judged by the number of capsules produced, and the average number of seeds + per capsule: 89. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica—plants left uncovered and cross-fertilised + by bees; capsules on plants derived from intercrossed plants of the 2nd + generation of the Brazilian stock crossed by English stock, compared with + capsules on self-fertilised plants of 2nd generation, contained seeds, in + number: 63. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica—productiveness of the same plants, as + judged by the number of capsules produced, and the average number of seeds + per capsule: 40. + </p> + <p> + Reseda odorata—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left uncovered + and cross-fertilised by bees; produced capsules in number (about): 100. + </p> + <p> + Viola tricolor—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left uncovered + and cross-fertilised by bees, produced capsules in number: 10. + </p> + <p> + Delphinium consolida—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left + uncovered in the greenhouse, produced capsules in number: 56. + </p> + <p> + Viscaria oculata—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left uncovered + in the greenhouse, produced capsules in number: 77. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus—plants spontaneously self-fertilised under a + net; capsules on intercrossed and self-fertilised plants of the 3rd + generation contained seeds in number: 125. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus—plants left uncovered and cross-fertilised by + insects: offspring from plants self-fertilised for three generations and + then crossed by an intercrossed plant of the same stock, compared with + plants of the 4th self-fertilised generation, produced seeds by weight: + 73. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus—plants left uncovered and cross-fertilised by + insects: offspring from plants self-fertilised for three generations and + then crossed by a fresh stock, compared with plants of the 4th + self-fertilised generation, produced seeds by weight: 33. + </p> + <p> + Tropaeolum minus—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left uncovered + in the greenhouse, produced seeds in number: 64. + </p> + <p> + Limnanthes douglasii—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left + uncovered in the greenhouse, produced capsules in number (about): 100. + </p> + <p> + Lupinus luteus—crossed and self-fertilised plants of the 2nd + generation, left uncovered in the greenhouse, produced seeds in number + (judged from only a few pods): 88. + </p> + <p> + Phaseolus multiflorus—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left + uncovered in the greenhouse, produced seeds in number (about): 100. + </p> + <p> + Lathyrus odoratus—crossed and self-fertilised plants of the 2nd + generation, left uncovered in the greenhouse, but certainly + self-fertilised, produced pods in number: 91. + </p> + <p> + Clarkia elegans—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left uncovered + in the greenhouse, produced capsules in number: 60. + </p> + <p> + Nemophila insignis—crossed and self-fertilised plants, covered by a + net and spontaneously self-fertilised in the greenhouse, produced capsules + in number: 29. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea—left uncovered and cross-fertilised by insects: + plants of the 5th intercrossed and self-fertilised generations produced + seeds, as judged by the weight of an equal number of capsules: 86. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea—left uncovered as above: offspring of plants + self-fertilised for four generations and then crossed by a fresh stock, + compared with plants of the 5th self-fertilised generation, produced + seeds, as judged by the weight of an equal number of capsules: 46. + </p> + <p> + Cyclamen persicum—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left uncovered + in the greenhouse, produced capsules in number: 12. + </p> + <p> + Anagallis collina—crossed and self-fertilised plants, left uncovered + in the greenhouse, produced capsules in number: 8. + </p> + <p> + Primula veris—left uncovered in open ground and cross-fertilised by + insects: offspring from plants of the 3rd illegitimate generation crossed + by a fresh stock, compared with plants of the 4th illegitimate and + self-fertilised generation, produced capsules in number: 5. + </p> + <p> + Same plants in the following year: 3.5. + </p> + <p> + Primula veris—(equal-styled variety): left uncovered in open ground + and cross-fertilised by insects: offspring from plants self-fertilised for + two generations and then crossed by another variety, compared with plants + of the 3rd self-fertilised generation, produced capsules in number: 15. + </p> + <p> + Primula veris—(equal-styled variety) same plants; average number of + seeds per capsule: 71. + </p> + <p> + Primula veris—(equal-styled variety) productiveness of the same + plants, as judged by the number of capsules produced and the average + number of seeds per capsule: 11. + </p> + <p> + This table includes thirty-three cases relating to twenty-three species, + and shows the degree of innate fertility of plants of crossed parentage in + comparison with those of self-fertilised parentage; both lots being + fertilised in the same manner. With several of the species, as with + Eschscholtzia, Reseda, Viola, Dianthus, Petunia, and Primula, both lots + were certainly cross-fertilised by insects, and so it probably was with + several of the others; but in some of the species, as with Nemophila, and + in some of the trials with Ipomoea and Dianthus, the plants were covered + up, and both lots were spontaneously self-fertilised. This also was + necessarily the case with the capsules produced by the cleistogene flowers + of Vandellia. + </p> + <p> + The fertility of the crossed plants is represented in Table 9/D by 100, + and that of the self-fertilised by the other figures. There are five cases + in which the fertility of the self-fertilised plants is approximately + equal to that of the crossed; nevertheless, in four of these cases the + crossed plants were plainly taller, and in the fifth somewhat taller than + the self-fertilised. But I should state that in some of these five cases + the fertility of the two lots was not strictly ascertained, as the + capsules were not actually counted, from appearing equal in number and + from all apparently containing a full complement of seeds. In only two + instances in the table, namely, with Vandellia and in the third generation + of Dianthus, the capsules on the self-fertilised plants contained more + seed than those on the crossed plants. With Dianthus the ratio between the + number of seeds contained in the self-fertilised and crossed capsules was + as 125 to 100; both sets of plants were left to fertilise themselves under + a net; and it is almost certain that the greater fertility of the + self-fertilised plants was here due merely to their having varied and + become less strictly dichogamous, so as to mature their anthers and + stigmas more nearly at the same time than is proper to the species. + Excluding the seven cases now referred to, there remain twenty-six in + which the crossed plants were manifestly much more fertile, sometimes to + an extraordinary degree, than the self-fertilised with which they grew in + competition. The most striking instances are those in which plants derived + from a cross with a fresh stock are compared with plants of one of the + later self-fertilised generations; yet there are some striking cases, as + that of Viola, between the intercrossed plants of the same stock and the + self-fertilised, even in the first generation. The results most to be + trusted are those in which the productiveness of the plants was + ascertained by the number of capsules produced by an equal number of + plants, together with the actual or average number of seeds in each + capsule. Of such cases there are twelve in the table, and the mean of + their mean fertility is as 100 for the crossed plants, to 59 for the + self-fertilised plants. The Primulaceae seem eminently liable to suffer in + fertility from self-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + The following short table, Table 9/E, includes four cases which have + already been partly given in the last table. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 9/E.—INNATE FERTILITY OF PLANTS FROM A CROSS WITH A FRESH + STOCK, COMPARED WITH THAT OF INTERCROSSED PLANTS OF THE SAME STOCK, AND + WITH THAT OF SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS, ALL OF THE CORRESPONDING GENERATION. + FERTILITY JUDGED OF BY THE NUMBER OR WEIGHT OF SEEDS PRODUCED BY AN EQUAL + NUMBER OF PLANTS. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Name of plant and feature observed. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: Plants from a cross with a fresh stock. + </p> + <p> + Column 3: Intercrossed plants of the same stock. + </p> + <p> + Column 4: Self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus—the intercrossed plants are derived from a cross + between two plants of the 8th self-fertilised generation. The + self-fertilised plants belong to the 9th generation: 100 : 4 : 3. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica—the intercrossed and self-fertilised + plants belong to the 2nd generation: 100 : 45 : 40. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus—the intercrossed plants are derived from + self-fertilised of the 3rd generation, crossed by intercrossed plants of + the 3rd generation. The self-fertilised plants belong to the 4th + generation: 100 : 45 : 33. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea—the intercrossed and self-fertilised plants belong + to the 5th generation: 100 : 54 : 46. + </p> + <p> + NB.—In the above cases, excepting in that of Eschscholtzia, the + plants derived from a cross with a fresh stock belong on the mother-side + to the same stock with the intercrossed and self-fertilised plants, and to + the corresponding generation. + </p> + <p> + These cases show us how greatly superior in innate fertility the seedlings + from plants self-fertilised or intercrossed for several generations and + then crossed by a fresh stock are, in comparison with the seedlings from + plants of the old stock, either intercrossed or self-fertilised for the + same number of generations. The three lots of plants in each case were + left freely exposed to the visits of insects, and their flowers without + doubt were cross-fertilised by them. + </p> + <p> + Table 9/E further shows us that in all four cases the intercrossed plants + of the same stock still have a decided though small advantage in fertility + over the self-fertilised plants. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the state of the reproductive organs in the + self-fertilised plants of Tables 9/D and 9/E, only a few observations were + made. In the seventh and eighth generation of Ipomoea, the anthers in the + flowers of the self-fertilised plants were plainly smaller than those in + the flowers of the intercrossed plants. The tendency to sterility in these + same plants was also shown by the first-formed flowers, after they had + been carefully fertilised, often dropping off, in the same manner as + frequently occurs with hybrids. The flowers likewise tended to be + monstrous. In the fourth generation of Petunia, the pollen produced by the + self-fertilised and intercrossed plants was compared, and they were far + more empty and shrivelled grains in the former. + </p> + <p> + RELATIVE FERTILITY OF FLOWERS CROSSED WITH POLLEN FROM A DISTINCT PLANT + AND WITH THEIR OWN POLLEN. THIS HEADING INCLUDES FLOWERS ON THE + PARENT-PLANTS, AND ON THE CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED SEEDLINGS OF THE + FIRST OR A SUCCEEDING GENERATION. + </p> + <p> + I will first treat of the parent-plants, which were raised from seeds + purchased from nursery-gardens, or taken from plants growing in my garden, + or growing wild, and surrounded in every case by many individuals of the + same species. Plants thus circumstanced will commonly have been + intercrossed by insects; so that the seedlings which were first + experimented on will generally have been the product of a cross. + Consequently any difference in the fertility of their flowers, when + crossed and self-fertilised, will have been caused by the nature of the + pollen employed; that is, whether it was taken from a distinct plant or + from the same flower. The degrees of fertility shown in Table 9/F, were + determined in each case by the average number of seeds per capsule, + ascertained either by counting or weighing. + </p> + <p> + Another element ought properly to have been taken into account, namely, + the proportion of flowers which yielded capsules when they were crossed + and self-fertilised; and as crossed flowers generally produce a larger + proportion of capsules, their superiority in fertility, if this element + had been taken into account, would have been much more strongly marked + than appears in Table 9/F. But had I thus acted, there would have been + greater liability to error, as pollen applied to the stigma at the wrong + time fails to produce any effect, independently of its greater or less + potency. A good illustration of the great difference in the results which + sometimes follows, if the number of capsules produced relatively to the + number of flowers fertilised be included in the calculation, was afforded + by Nolana prostrata. Thirty flowers on some plants of this species were + crossed and produced twenty-seven capsules, each containing five seeds; + thirty-two flowers on the same plants were self-fertilised and produced + only six capsules, each containing five seeds. As the number of seeds per + capsule is here the same, the fertility of the crossed and self-fertilised + flowers is given in Table 9/F as equal, or as 100 to 100. But if the + flowers which failed to produce capsules be included, the crossed flowers + yielded on an average 4.50 seeds, whilst the self-fertilised flowers + yielded only 0.94 seeds, so that their relative fertility would have been + as 100 to 21. I should here state that it has been found convenient to + reserve for separate discussion the cases of flowers which are usually + quite sterile with their own pollen. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 9/f.—relative fertility of the flowers on the parent-plants + used in my experiments, when fertilised with pollen from a distinct plant + and with their own pollen. Fertility judged of by the average number of + seeds per capsule. Fertility of crossed flowers taken as 100. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Name of plant and feature observed. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: x, in the expression 100 to x. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as (about): 100. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds as + (by weight): 79. + </p> + <p> + Linaria vulgaris—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 14. + </p> + <p> + Vandellia nummularifolia—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded + seeds as: 67? + </p> + <p> + Gesneria pendulina—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as (by weight): 100. + </p> + <p> + Salvia coccinea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds as + (about): 100. + </p> + <p> + Brassica oleracea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 25. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica—(English stock) crossed and + self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds as (by weight): 71. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica—(Brazilian stock grown in England) crossed + and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds (by weight) as (about): 15. + </p> + <p> + Delphinium consolida—crossed and self-fertilised flowers + (self-fertilised capsules spontaneously produced, but result supported by + other evidence) yielded seeds as: 59. + </p> + <p> + Viscaria oculata—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as (by weight): 38. + </p> + <p> + Viscaria oculata—crossed and self-fertilised flowers (crossed + capsules compared on following year with spontaneously self-fertilised + capsules) yielded seeds as : 58. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded + seeds as: 92. + </p> + <p> + Tropaeolum minus—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 92. + </p> + <p> + Tropaeolum tricolorum—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded + seeds as: 115. (9/1. Tropaeolum tricolorum and Cuphea purpurea have been + introduced into this table, although seedlings were not raised from them; + but of the Cuphea only six crossed and six self-fertilised capsules, and + of the Tropaeolum only six crossed and eleven self-fertilised capsules, + were compared. A larger proportion of the self-fertilised than of the + crossed flowers of the Tropaeolum produced fruit.) + </p> + <p> + Limnanthes douglasii—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded + seeds as (about): 100. + </p> + <p> + Sarothamnus scoparius—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded + seeds as: 41. + </p> + <p> + Ononis minutissima—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 65. + </p> + <p> + Cuphea purpurea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 113. + </p> + <p> + Passiflora gracilis—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded + seeds as: 85. + </p> + <p> + Specularia speculum—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded + seeds as: 72. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia fulgens—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds as + (about): 100. + </p> + <p> + Nemophila insignis—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as (by weight): 69. + </p> + <p> + Borago officinalis—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 60. + </p> + <p> + Nolana prostrata—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 100. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as (by weight): 67. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as (by weight): 150. + </p> + <p> + Cyclamen persicum—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 38. + </p> + <p> + Anagallis collina—crossed and self-fertilised flowers yielded seeds + as: 96. + </p> + <p> + Canna warscewiczi—crossed and self-fertilised flowers (on three + generations of crossed and self-fertilised plants taken all together) + yielded seeds as: 85. + </p> + <p> + Table 9/G gives the relative fertility of flowers on crossed plants again + cross-fertilised, and of flowers on self-fertilised plants again + self-fertilised, either in the first or in a later generation. Here two + causes combine to diminish the fertility of the self-fertilised flowers; + namely, the lesser efficacy of pollen from the same flower, and the innate + lessened fertility of plants derived from self-fertilised seeds, which as + we have seen in the previous Table 9/D is strongly marked. The fertility + was determined in the same manner as in Table 9/F, that is, by the average + number of seeds per capsule; and the same remarks as before, with respect + to the different proportion of flowers which set capsules when they are + cross-fertilised and self-fertilised, are here likewise applicable. + </p> + <p> + TABLE 9/G.—RELATIVE FERTILITY OF FLOWERS ON CROSSED AND + SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE FIRST OR SOME SUCCEEDING GENERATION; THE + FORMER BEING AGAIN FERTILISED WITH POLLEN FROM A DISTINCT PLANT, AND THE + LATTER AGAIN WITH THEIR OWN POLLEN. FERTILITY JUDGED OF BY THE AVERAGE + NUMBER OF SEEDS PER CAPSULE. FERTILITY OF CROSSED FLOWERS TAKEN AS 100. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Name of plant and feature observed. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: x, in the expression, 100 to x. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the first generation yielded seeds as: 93. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 3rd generation yielded seeds as: 94. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 4th generation yielded seeds as: 94. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 5th generation yielded seeds as: 107. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 3rd generation yielded seeds as (by + weight): 65. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus—same plants of the 3rd generation treated in the same + manner on the following year yielded seeds as (by weight): 34. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 4th generation yielded seeds as (by + weight): 40. + </p> + <p> + Viola tricolor—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 1st generation yielded seeds as: 69. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the + crossed and self-fertilised plants of the 1st generation yielded seeds as: + 65. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus—flowers on self-fertilised plants of the 3rd + generation crossed by intercrossed plants, and other flowers again + self-fertilised yielded seeds as: 97. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus—flowers on self-fertilised plants of the 3rd + generation crossed by a fresh stock, and other flowers again + self-fertilised yielded seeds as: 127. + </p> + <p> + Lathytus odoratus—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 1st generation yielded seeds as: 65. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia ramosa—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 1st generation yielded seeds as (by + weight): 60. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 1st generation yielded seeds as (by + weight): 68. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 4th generation yielded seeds as (by + weight): 72. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea—flowers on self-fertilised plants of the 4th + generation crossed by a fresh stock, and other flowers again + self-fertilised yielded seeds as (by weight): 48. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of the 1st generation yielded seeds as (by + weight): 97. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum—flowers on self-fertilised plants of the 2nd + generation crossed by intercrossed plants, and other flowers again + self-fertilised yielded seeds as (by estimation): 110. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum—flowers on self-fertilised plants of the 3rd + generation crossed by a fresh stock, and other flowers again + self-fertilised yielded seeds as (by estimation): 110. + </p> + <p> + Anagallis collina—flowers on red variety crossed by a blue variety, + and other flowers on the red variety self-fertilised yielded seeds as: 48. + </p> + <p> + Canna warscewiczi—crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the crossed + and self-fertilised plants of three generations taken together yielded + seeds as: 85. + </p> + <p> + As both these tables relate to the fertility of flowers fertilised by + pollen from another plant and by their own pollen, they may be considered + together. The difference between them consists in the self-fertilised + flowers in Table 9/G, being produced by self-fertilised parents, and the + crossed flowers by crossed parents, which in the later generations had + become somewhat closely inter-related, and had been subjected all the time + to nearly the same conditions. These two tables include fifty cases + relating to thirty-two species. The flowers on many other species were + crossed and self-fertilised, but as only a few were thus treated, the + results cannot be trusted, as far as fertility is concerned, and are not + here given. Some other cases have been rejected, as the plants were in an + unhealthy condition. If we look to the figures in the two tables + expressing the ratios between the mean relative fertility of the crossed + and self-fertilised flowers, we see that in a majority of cases (i.e., in + thirty-five out of fifty) flowers fertilised by pollen from a distinct + plant yield more, sometimes many more, seeds than flowers fertilised with + their own pollen; and they commonly set a larger proportion of capsules. + The degree of infertility of the self-fertilised flowers differs extremely + in the different species, and even, as we shall see in the section on + self-sterile plants, in the individuals of the same species, as well as + under slightly changed conditions of life. Their fertility ranges from + zero to fertility equalling that of the crossed flowers; and of this fact + no explanation can be offered. There are fifteen cases in the two tables + in which the number of seeds per capsule produced by the self-fertilised + flowers equals or even exceeds that yielded by the crossed flowers. Some + few of these cases are, I believe, accidental; that is, would not recur on + a second trial. This was apparently the case with the plants of the fifth + generation of Ipomoea, and in one of the experiments with Dianthus. + Nicotiana offers the most anomalous case of any, as the self-fertilised + flowers on the parent-plants, and on their descendants of the second and + third generations, produced more seeds than did the crossed flowers; but + we shall recur to this case when we treat of highly self-fertile + varieties. + </p> + <p> + It might have been expected that the difference in fertility between the + crossed and self-fertilised flowers would have been more strongly marked + in Table 9/G, in which the plants of one set were derived from + self-fertilised parents, than in Table 9/F, in which flowers on the + parent-plants were self-fertilised for the first time. But this is not the + case, as far as my scanty materials allow of any judgment. There is + therefore no evidence at present, that the fertility of plants goes on + diminishing in successive self-fertilised generations, although there is + some rather weak evidence that this does occur with respect to their + height or growth. But we should bear in mind that in the later generations + the crossed plants had become more or less closely inter-related, and had + been subjected all the time to nearly uniform conditions. + </p> + <p> + It is remarkable that there is no close correspondence, either in the + parent-plants or in the successive generations, between the relative + number of seeds produced by the crossed and self-fertilised flowers, and + the relative powers of growth of the seedlings raised from such seeds. + Thus, the crossed and self-fertilised flowers on the parent-plants of + Ipomoea, Gesneria, Salvia, Limnanthes, Lobelia fulgens, and Nolana + produced a nearly equal number of seeds, yet the plants raised from the + crossed seeds exceeded considerably in height those raised from the + self-fertilised seeds. The crossed flowers of Linaria and Viscaria yielded + far more seeds than the self-fertilised flowers; and although the plants + raised from the former were taller than those from the latter, they were + not so in any corresponding degree. With Nicotiana the flowers fertilised + with their own pollen were more productive than those crossed with pollen + from a slightly different variety; yet the plants raised from the latter + seeds were much taller, heavier, and more hardy than those raised from the + self-fertilised seeds. On the other hand, the crossed seedlings of + Eschscholtzia were neither taller nor heavier than the self-fertilised, + although the crossed flowers were far more productive than the + self-fertilised. But the best evidence of a want of correspondence between + the number of seeds produced by crossed and self-fertilised flowers, and + the vigour of the offspring raised from them, is afforded by the plants of + the Brazilian and European stocks of Eschscholtzia, and likewise by + certain individual plants of Reseda odorata; for it might have been + expected that the seedlings from plants, the flowers of which were + excessively self-sterile, would have profited in a greater degree by a + cross, than the seedlings from plants which were moderately or fully + self-fertile, and therefore apparently had no need to be crossed. But no + such result followed in either case: for instance, the crossed and + self-fertilised offspring from a highly self-fertile plant of Reseda + odorata were in average height to each other as 100 to 82; whereas the + similar offspring from an excessively self-sterile plant were as 100 to 92 + in average height. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the innate fertility of the plants of crossed and + self-fertilised parentage, given in the previous Table 9/D—that is, + the number of seeds produced by both lots when their flowers were + fertilised in the same manner,—nearly the same remarks are + applicable, in reference to the absence of any close correspondence + between their fertility and powers of growth, as in the case of the plants + in the Tables 9/F and 9/G, just considered. Thus the crossed and + self-fertilised plants of Ipomoea, Papaver, Reseda odorata, and Limnanthes + were almost equally fertile, yet the former exceeded considerably in + height the self-fertilised plants. On the other hand, the crossed and + self-fertilised plants of Mimulus and Primula differed to an extreme + degree in innate fertility, but by no means to a corresponding degree in + height or vigour. + </p> + <p> + In all the cases of self-fertilised flowers included in Tables 9/E, 9/F, + and 9/G, these were fertilised with their own pollen; but there is another + form of self-fertilisation, namely, by pollen from other flowers on the + same plant; but this latter method made no difference in comparison with + the former in the number of seeds produced, or only a slight difference. + Neither with Digitalis nor Dianthus were more seeds produced by the one + method than by the other, to any trustworthy degree. With Ipomoea rather + more seeds, in the proportion of 100 to 91, were produced from a crossed + between flowers on the same plant than from strictly self-fertilised + flowers; but I have reason to suspect that the result was accidental. With + Origanum vulgare, however, a cross between flowers on plants propagated by + stolons from the same stock certainly increased slightly their fertility. + This likewise occurred, as we shall see in the next section, with + Eschscholtzia, perhaps with Corydalis cava and Oncidium; but not so with + Bignonia, Abutilon, Tabernaemontana, Senecio, and apparently Reseda + odorata. + </p> + <h3> + SELF-STERILE PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + The cases here to be described might have been introduced in Table 9/F, + which gives the relative fertility of flowers fertilised with their own + pollen, and with that from a distinct plant, but it has been found more + convenient to keep them for separate discussion. The present cases must + not be confounded with those to be given in the next chapter relatively to + flowers which are sterile when insects are excluded; for such sterility + depends not merely on the flowers being incapable of fertilisation with + their own pollen, but on mechanical causes, by which their pollen is + prevented from reaching the stigma, or on the pollen and stigma of the + same flower being matured at different periods. + </p> + <p> + In the seventeenth chapter of my ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under + Domestication’ I had occasion to enter fully on the present subject; and I + will therefore here give only a brief abstract of the cases there + described, but others must be added, as they have an important bearing on + the present work. Kolreuter long ago described plants of Verbascum + phoeniceum which during two years were sterile with their own pollen, but + were easily fertilised by that of four other species; these plants however + afterwards became more or less self-fertile in a strangely fluctuating + manner. Mr. Scott also found that this species, as well as two of its + varieties, were self-sterile, as did Gartner in the case of Verbascum + nigrum. So it was, according to this latter author, with two plants of + Lobelia fulgens, though the pollen and ovules of both were in an efficient + state in relation to other species. Five species of Passiflora and certain + individuals of a sixth species have been found sterile with their own + pollen; but slight changes in their conditions, such as being grafted on + another stock or a change of temperature, rendered them self-fertile. + Flowers on a completely self-impotent plant of Passiflora alata fertilised + with pollen from its own self-impotent seedlings were quite fertile. Mr. + Scott, and afterwards Mr. Munro, found that some species of Oncidium and + of Maxillaria cultivated in a hothouse in Edinburgh were quite sterile + with their own pollen; and Fritz Muller found this to be the case with a + large number of Orchidaceous genera growing in their native home of South + Brazil. (9/2. ‘Botanische Zeitung’ 1868 page 114.) He also discovered that + the pollen-masses of some orchids acted on their own stigmas like a + poison; and it appears that Gartner formerly observed indications of this + extraordinary fact in the case of some other plants. + </p> + <p> + Fritz Muller also states that a species of Bignonia and Tabernaemontana + echinata are both sterile with their own pollen in their native country of + Brazil. (9/3. Ibid 1868 page 626 and 1870 page 274.) Several + Amaryllidaceous and Liliaceous plants are in the same predicament. + Hildebrand observed with care Corydalis cava, and found it completely + self-sterile (9/4. ‘Report of the International Horticultural Congress’ + 1866.); but according to Caspary a few self-fertilised seeds are + occasionally produced: Corydalis halleri is only slightly self-sterile, + and C. intermedia not at all so. (9/5. ‘Botanische Zeitung’ June 27, + 1873.) In another Fumariaceous genus, Hypecoum, Hildebrand observed that + H. grandiflorum was highly self-sterile, whilst H. procumbens was fairly + self-fertile. (9/6. ‘Jahrb. fur wiss. Botanik’ B. 7 page 464.) Thunbergia + alata kept by me in a warm greenhouse was self-sterile early in the + season, but at a later period produced many spontaneously self-fertilised + fruits. So it was with Papaver vagum: another species, P. alpinum, was + found by Professor H. Hoffmann to be quite self-sterile excepting on one + occasion (9/7. ‘Zur Speciesfrage’ 1875 page 47.); whilst P. somniferum has + been with me always completely self-sterile. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica. + </p> + <p> + This species deserves a fuller consideration. A plant cultivated by Fritz + Muller in South Brazil happened to flower a month before any of the + others, and it did not produce a single capsule. This led him to make + further observations during the next six generations, and he found that + all his plants were completely sterile, unless they were crossed by + insects or were artificially fertilised with pollen from a distinct plant, + in which case they were completely fertile. (9/8. ‘Botanische Zeitung’ + 1868 page 115 and 1869 page 223.) I was much surprised at this fact, as I + had found that English plants, when covered by a net, set a considerable + number of capsules; and that these contained seeds by weight, compared + with those on plants intercrossed by the bees, as 71 to 100. Professor + Hildebrand, however, found this species much more self-sterile in Germany + than it was with me in England, for the capsules produced by + self-fertilised flowers, compared with those from intercrossed flowers, + contained seeds in the ratio of only 11 to 100. At my request Fritz Muller + sent me from Brazil seeds of his self-sterile plants, from which I raised + seedlings. Two of these were covered with a net, and one produced + spontaneously only a single capsule containing no good seeds, but yet, + when artificially fertilised with its own pollen, produced a few capsules. + The other plant produced spontaneously under the net eight capsules, one + of which contained no less than thirty seeds, and on an average about ten + seeds per capsule. Eight flowers on these two plants were artificially + self-fertilised, and produced seven capsules, containing on an average + twelve seeds; eight other flowers were fertilised with pollen from a + distinct plant of the Brazilian stock, and produced eight capsules, + containing on an average about eighty seeds: this gives a ratio of 15 + seeds for the self-fertilised capsules to 100 for the crossed capsules. + Later in the season twelve other flowers on these two plants were + artificially self-fertilised; but they yielded only two capsules, + containing three and six seeds. It appears therefore that a lower + temperature than that of Brazil favours the self-fertility of this plant, + whilst a still lower temperature lessens it. As soon as the two plants + which had been covered by the net were uncovered, they were visited by + many bees,and it was interesting to observe how quickly they became, even + the more sterile plant of the two, covered with young capsules. On the + following year eight flowers on plants of the Brazilian stock of + self-fertilised parentage (i.e., grandchildren of the plants which grew in + Brazil) were again self-fertilised, and produced five capsules, containing + on an average 27.4 seeds, with a maximum in one of forty-two seeds; so + that their self-fertility had evidently increased greatly by being reared + for two generations in England. On the whole we may conclude that plants + of the Brazilian stock are much more self-fertile in this country than in + Brazil, and less so than plants of the English stock in England; so that + the plants of Brazilian parentage retained by inheritance some of their + former sexual constitution. Conversely, seeds from English plants sent by + me to Fritz Muller and grown in Brazil, were much more self-fertile than + his plants which had been cultivated there for several generations; but he + informs me that one of the plants of English parentage which did not + flower the first year, and was thus exposed for two seasons to the climate + of Brazil, proved quite self-sterile, like a Brazilian plant, showing how + quickly the climate had acted on its sexual constitution. + </p> + <p> + Abutilon darwinii. + </p> + <p> + Seeds of this plant were sent me by Fritz Muller, who found it, as well as + some other species of the same genus, quite sterile in its native home of + South Brazil, unless fertilised with pollen from a distinct plant, either + artificially or naturally by humming-birds. (9/9. ‘Jenaische Zeitschr. fur + Naturwiss’ B. 7 1872 page 22 and 1873 page 441.) Several plants were + raised from these seeds and kept in the hothouse. They produced flowers + very early in the spring, and twenty of them were fertilised, some with + pollen from the same flower, and some with pollen from other flowers on + the same plants; but not a single capsule was thus produced, yet the + stigmas twenty-seven hours after the application of the pollen were + penetrated by the pollen-tubes. At the same time nineteen flowers were + crossed with pollen from a distinct plant, and these produced thirteen + capsules, all abounding with fine seeds. A greater number of capsules + would have been produced by the cross, had not some of the nineteen + flowers been on a plant which was afterwards proved to be from some + unknown cause completely sterile with pollen of any kind. Thus far these + plants behaved exactly like those in Brazil; but later in the season, in + the latter part of May and in June, they began to produce under a net a + few spontaneously self-fertilised capsules. As soon as this occurred, + sixteen flowers were fertilised with their own pollen, and these produced + five capsules, containing on an average 3.4 seeds. At the same time I + selected by chance four capsules from the uncovered plants growing close + by, the flowers of which I had seen visited by humble-bees, and these + contained on an average 21.5 seeds; so that the seeds in the naturally + intercrossed capsules to those in the self-fertilised capsules were as 100 + to 16. The interesting point in this case is that these plants, which were + unnaturally treated by being grown in pots in a hothouse, under another + hemisphere, with a complete reversal of the seasons, were thus rendered + slightly self-fertile, whereas they seem always to be completely + self-sterile in their native home. + </p> + <p> + Senecio cruentus (greenhouse varieties, commonly called Cinerarias, + probably derived from several fruticose or herbaceous species much + intercrossed (9/10. I am much obliged to Mr. Moore and to Mr. Thiselton + Dyer for giving me information with respect to the varieties on which I + experimented. Mr. Moore believes that Senecio cruentas, tussilaginis, and + perhaps heritieri, maderensis and populifolius have all been more or less + blended together in our Cinerarias.)) + </p> + <p> + Two purple-flowered varieties were placed under a net in the greenhouse, + and four corymbs on each were repeatedly brushed with flowers from the + other plant, so that their stigmas were well covered with each other’s + pollen. Two of the eight corymbs thus treated produced very few seeds, but + the other six produced on an average 41.3 seeds per corymb, and these + germinated well. The stigmas on four other corymbs on both plants were + well smeared with pollen from the flowers on their own corymbs; these + eight corymbs produced altogether ten extremely poor seeds, which proved + incapable of germinating. I examined many flowers on both plants, and + found the stigmas spontaneously covered with pollen; but they produced not + a single seed. These plants were afterwards left uncovered in the same + house where many other Cinerarias were in flower; and the flowers were + frequently visited by bees. They then produced plenty of seed, but one of + the two plants less than the other, as this species shows some tendency to + be dioecious. + </p> + <p> + The trial was repeated on another variety with white petals tipped with + red. Many stigmas on two corymbs were covered with pollen from the + foregoing purple variety, and these produced eleven and twenty-two seeds, + which germinated well. A large number of the stigmas on several of the + other corymbs were repeatedly smeared with pollen from their own corymb; + but they yielded only five very poor seeds, which were incapable of + germination. Therefore the above three plants belonging to two varieties, + though growing vigorously and fertile with pollen from either of the other + two plants, were utterly sterile with pollen from other flowers on the + same plant. + </p> + <p> + Reseda odorata. + </p> + <p> + Having observed that certain individuals were self-sterile, I covered + during the summer of 1868 seven plants under separate nets, and will call + these plants A, B, C, D, E, F, G. They all appeared to be quite sterile + with their own pollen, but fertile with that of any other plant. + </p> + <p> + Fourteen flowers on A were crossed with pollen from B or C, and produced + thirteen fine capsules. Sixteen flowers were fertilised with pollen from + other flowers on the same plant, but yielded not a single capsule. + </p> + <p> + Fourteen flowers on B were crossed with pollen from A, C or D, and all + produced capsules; some of these were not very fine, yet they contained + plenty of seeds. Eighteen flowers were fertilised with pollen from other + flowers on the same plant, and produced not one capsule. + </p> + <p> + Ten flowers on C were crossed with pollen from A, B, D or E, and produced + nine fine capsules. Nineteen flowers were fertilised with pollen from + other flowers on the same plant, and produced no capsules. + </p> + <p> + Ten flowers on D were crossed with pollen from A, B, C or E, and produced + nine fine capsules. Eighteen flowers were fertilised with pollen from + other flowers on the same plant, and produced no capsules. + </p> + <p> + Seven flowers on E were crossed with pollen from A, C, or D, and all + produced fine capsules. Eight flowers were fertilised with pollen from + other flowers on the same plant, and produced no capsules. + </p> + <p> + On the plants F and G no flowers were crossed, but very many (number not + recorded) were fertilised with pollen from other flowers on the same + plants, and these did not produce a single capsule. + </p> + <p> + We thus see that fifty-five flowers on five of the above plants were + reciprocally crossed in various ways; several flowers on each of these + plants being fertilised with pollen from several of the other plants. + These fifty-five flowers produced fifty-two capsules, almost all of which + were of full size and contained an abundance of seeds. On the other hand, + seventy-nine flowers (besides many others not recorded) were fertilised + with pollen from other flowers on the same plants, and these did not + produce a single capsule. In one case in which I examined the stigmas of + the flowers fertilised with their own pollen, these were penetrated by the + pollen-tubes, although such penetration produced no effect. Pollen falls + generally, and I believe always, from the anthers on the stigmas of the + same flower; yet only three out of the above seven protected plants + produced spontaneously any capsules, and these it might have been thought + must have been self-fertilised. There were altogether seven such capsules; + but as they were all seated close to the artificially crossed flowers, I + can hardly doubt that a few grains of foreign pollen had accidentally + fallen on their stigmas. Besides the above seven plants, four others were + kept covered under the SAME large net; and some of these produced here and + there in the most capricious manner little groups of capsules; and this + makes me believe that a bee, many of which settled on the outside of the + net, being attracted by the odour, had on some one occasion found an + entrance, and had intercrossed a few of the flowers. + </p> + <p> + In the spring of 1869 four plants raised from fresh seeds were carefully + protected under separate nets; and now the result was widely different to + what it was before. Three of these protected plants became actually loaded + with capsules, especially during the early part of the summer; and this + fact indicates that temperature produces some effect, but the experiment + given in the following paragraph shows that the innate constitution of the + plant is a far more important element. The fourth plant produced only a + few capsules, many of them of small size; yet it was far more self-fertile + than any of the seven plants tried during the previous year. The flowers + on four small branches of this semi-self-sterile plant were smeared with + pollen from one of the other plants, and they all produced fine capsules. + </p> + <p> + As I was much surprised at the difference in the results of the trials + made during the two previous years, six fresh plants were protected by + separate nets in the year 1870. Two of these proved almost completely + self-sterile, for on carefully searching them I found only three small + capsules, each containing either one or two seeds of small size, which, + however, germinated. A few flowers on both these plants were reciprocally + fertilised with each other’s pollen, and a few with pollen from one of the + following self-fertile plants, and all these flowers produced fine + capsules. The four other plants whilst still remaining protected beneath + the nets presented a wonderful contrast (though one of them in a somewhat + less degree than the others), for they became actually covered with + spontaneously self-fertilised capsules, as numerous as, or very nearly so, + and as fine as those on the unprotected plants growing near. + </p> + <p> + The above three spontaneously self-fertilised capsules produced by the two + almost completely self-sterile plants, contained altogether five seeds; + and from these I raised in the following year (1871) five plants, which + were kept under separate nets. They grew to an extraordinarily large size, + and on August 29th were examined. At first sight they appeared entirely + destitute of capsules; but on carefully searching their many branches, two + or three capsules were found on three of the plants, half-a-dozen on the + fourth, and about eighteen on the fifth plant. But all these capsules were + small, some being empty; the greater number contained only a single seed, + and very rarely more than one. After this examination the nets were taken + off, and the bees immediately carried pollen from one of these almost + self-sterile plants to the other, for no other plants grew near. After a + few weeks the ends of the branches on all five plants became covered with + capsules, presenting a curious contrast with the lower and naked parts of + the same long branches. These five plants therefore inherited almost + exactly the same sexual constitution as their parents; and without doubt a + self-sterile race of Mignonette could have been easily established. + </p> + <p> + Reseda lutea. + </p> + <p> + Plants of this species were raised from seeds gathered from a group of + wild plants growing at no great distance from my garden. After casually + observing that some of these plants were self-sterile, two plants taken by + hazard were protected under separate nets. One of these soon became + covered with spontaneously self-fertilised capsules, as numerous as those + on the surrounding unprotected plants; so that it was evidently quite + self-fertile. The other plant was partially self-sterile, producing very + few capsules, many of which were of small size. When, however, this plant + had grown tall, the uppermost branches became pressed against the net and + grew crooked, and in this position the bees were able to suck the flowers + through the meshes, and brought pollen to them from the neighbouring + plants. These branches then became loaded with capsules; the other and + lower branches remaining almost bare. The sexual constitution of this + species is therefore similar to that of Reseda odorata. + </p> + <h3> + CONCLUDING REMARKS ON SELF-STERILE PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + In order to favour as far as possible the self-fertilisation of some of + the foregoing plants, all the flowers on Reseda odorata and some of those + on the Abutilon were fertilised with pollen from other flowers on the same + plant, instead of with their own pollen, and in the case of the Senecio + with pollen from other flowers on the same corymb; but this made no + difference in the result. Fritz Muller tried both kinds of + self-fertilisation in the case of Bignonia, Tabernaemontana and Abutilon, + likewise with no difference in the result. With Eschscholtzia, however, he + found that pollen from other flowers on the same plant was a little more + effective than pollen from the same flower. So did Hildebrand in Germany; + as thirteen out of fourteen flowers of Eschscholtzia thus fertilised set + capsules, these containing on an average 9.5 seeds; whereas only fourteen + flowers out of twenty-one fertilised with their own pollen set capsules, + these containing on an average 9.0 seeds. (9/11. ‘Pringsheim’s Jahrbuch + fur wiss. Botanik’ 7 page 467.) Hildebrand found a trace of a similar + difference with Corydalis cava, as did Fritz Muller with an Oncidium. + (9/12. ‘Variation under Domestication’ chapter 17 2nd edition volume 2 + pages 113-115.) + </p> + <p> + In considering the several cases above given of complete or almost + complete self-sterility, we are first struck with their wide distribution + throughout the vegetable kingdom. Their number is not at present large, + for they can be discovered only by protecting plants from insects and then + fertilising them with pollen from another plant of the same species and + with their own pollen; and the latter must be proved to be in an efficient + state by other trials. Unless all this be done, it is impossible to know + whether their self-sterility may not be due to the male or female + reproductive organs, or to both, having been affected by changed + conditions of life. As in the course of my experiments I have found three + new cases, and as Fritz Muller has observed indications of several others, + it is probable that they will hereafter be proved to be far from rare. + (9/13. Mr. Wilder, the editor of a horticultural journal in the United + States quoted in ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1868 page 1286, states that Lilium + auratum, Impatiens pallida and fulva, and Forsythia viridissima, cannot be + fertilised with their own pollen.) + </p> + <p> + As with plants of the same species and parentage, some individuals are + self-sterile and others self-fertile, of which fact Reseda odorata offers + the most striking instances, it is not at all surprising that species of + the same genus differ in this same manner. Thus Verbascum phoeniceum and + nigrum are self-sterile, whilst V. thapsus and lychnitis are quite + self-fertile, as I know by trial. There is the same difference between + some of the species of Papaver, Corydalis, and of other genera. + Nevertheless, the tendency to self-sterility certainly runs to a certain + extent in groups, as we see in the genus Passiflora, and with the Vandeae + amongst Orchids. + </p> + <p> + Self-sterility differs much in degree in different plants. In those + extraordinary cases in which pollen from the same flower acts on the + stigma like a poison, it is almost certain that the plants would never + yield a single self-fertilised seed. Other plants, like Corydalis cava, + occasionally, though very rarely, produce a few self-fertilised seeds. A + large number of species, as may be seen in Table 9/F, are less fertile + with their own pollen than with that from another plant; and lastly, some + species are perfectly self-fertile. Even with the individuals of the same + species, as just remarked, some are utterly self-sterile, others + moderately so, and some perfectly self-fertile. The cause, whatever it may + be, which renders many plants more or less sterile with their own pollen, + that is, when they are self-fertilised, must be different, at least to a + certain extent, from that which determines the difference in height, + vigour, and fertility of the seedlings raised from self-fertilised and + crossed seeds; for we have already seen that the two classes of cases do + not by any means run parallel. This want of parallelism would be + intelligible, if it could be shown that self-sterility depended solely on + the incapacity of the pollen-tubes to penetrate the stigma of the same + flower deeply enough to reach the ovules; whilst the greater or less + vigorous growth of the seedlings no doubt depends on the nature of the + contents of the pollen-grains and ovules. Now it is certain that with some + plants the stigmatic secretion does not properly excite the pollen-grains, + so that the tubes are not properly developed, if the pollen is taken from + the same flower. This is the case according to Fritz Muller with + Eschscholtzia, for he found that the pollen-tubes did not penetrate the + stigma deeply; and with the Orchidaceous genus Notylia they failed + altogether to penetrate it. (9/14. ‘Botanische Zeitung’ 1868 pages 114, + 115.) + </p> + <p> + With dimorphic and trimorphic species, an illegitimate union between + plants of the same form presents the closest analogy with + self-fertilisation, whilst a legitimate union closely resembles + cross-fertilisation; and here again the lessened fertility or complete + sterility of an illegitimate union depends, at least in part, on the + incapacity for interaction between the pollen-grains and stigma. Thus with + Linum grandiflorum, as I have elsewhere shown, not more than two or three + out of hundreds of pollen-grains, either of the long-styled or + short-styled form, when placed on the stigma of their own form, emit their + tubes, and these do not penetrate deeply; nor does the stigma itself + change colour, as occurs when it is legitimately fertilised. (9/15. + ‘Journal of the Linnean Society Botany’ volume 7 1863 pages 73-75.) + </p> + <p> + On the other hand the difference in innate fertility, as well as in growth + between plants raised from crossed and self-fertilised seeds, and the + difference in fertility and growth between the legitimate and illegitimate + offspring of dimorphic and trimorphic plants, must depend on some + incompatibility between the sexual elements contained within the + pollen-grains and ovules, as it is through their union that new organisms + are developed. + </p> + <p> + If we now turn to the more immediate cause of self-sterility, we clearly + see that in most cases it is determined by the conditions to which the + plants have been subjected. Thus Eschscholtzia is completely self-sterile + in the hot climate of Brazil, but is perfectly fertile there with the + pollen of any other individual. The offspring of Brazilian plants became + in England in a single generation partially self-fertile, and still more + so in the second generation. Conversely, the offspring of English plants, + after growing for two seasons in Brazil, became in the first generation + quite self-sterile. Again, Abutilon darwinii, which is self-sterile in its + native home of Brazil, became moderately self-fertile in a single + generation in an English hothouse. Some other plants are self-sterile + during the early part of the year, and later in the season become + self-fertile. Passiflora alata lost its self-sterility when grafted on + another species. With Reseda, however, in which some individuals of the + same parentage are self-sterile and others are self-fertile, we are forced + in our ignorance to speak of the cause as due to spontaneous variability; + but we should remember that the progenitors of these plants, either on the + male or female side, may have been exposed to somewhat different + conditions. The power of the environment thus to affect so readily and in + so peculiar a manner the reproductive organs, is a fact which has many + important bearings; and I have therefore thought the foregoing details + worth giving. For instance, the sterility of many animals and plants under + changed conditions of life, such as confinement, evidently comes within + the same general principle of the sexual system being easily affected by + the environment. It has already been proved, that a cross between plants + which have been self-fertilised or intercrossed during several + generations, having been kept all the time under closely similar + conditions, does not benefit the offspring; and on the other hand, that a + cross between plants that have been subjected to different conditions + benefits the offspring to an extraordinary degree. We may therefore + conclude that some degree of differentiation in the sexual system is + necessary for the full fertility of the parent-plants and for the full + vigour of their offspring. It seems also probable that with those plants + which are capable of complete self-fertilisation, the male and female + elements and organs already differ to an extent sufficient to excite their + mutual interaction; but that when such plants are taken to another + country, and become in consequence self-sterile, their sexual elements and + organs are so acted on as to be rendered too uniform for such interaction, + like those of a self-fertilised plant long cultivated under the same + conditions. Conversely, we may further infer that plants which are + self-sterile in their native country, but become self-fertile under + changed conditions, have their sexual elements so acted on, that they + become sufficiently differentiated for mutual interaction. + </p> + <p> + We know that self-fertilised seedlings are inferior in many respects to + those from a cross; and as with plants in a state of nature pollen from + the same flower can hardly fail to be often left by insects or by the wind + on the stigma, it seems at first sight highly probable that self-sterility + has been gradually acquired through natural selection in order to prevent + self-fertilisation. It is no valid objection to this belief that the + structure of some flowers, and the dichogamous condition of many others, + suffice to prevent the pollen reaching the stigma of the same flower; for + we should remember that with most species many flowers expand at the same + time, and that pollen from the same plant is equally injurious or nearly + so as that from the same flower. Nevertheless, the belief that + self-sterility is a quality which has been gradually acquired for the + special purpose of preventing self-fertilisation must, I believe, be + rejected. In the first place, there is no close correspondence in degree + between the sterility of the parent-plants when self-fertilised, and the + extent to which their offspring suffer in vigour by this process; and some + such correspondence might have been expected if self-sterility had been + acquired on account of the injury caused by self-fertilisation. The fact + of individuals of the same parentage differing greatly in their degree of + self-sterility is likewise opposed to such a belief; unless, indeed, we + suppose that certain individuals have been rendered self-sterile to favour + intercrossing, whilst other individuals have been rendered self-fertile to + ensure the propagation of the species. The fact of self-sterile + individuals appearing only occasionally, as in the case of Lobelia, does + not countenance this latter view. But the strongest argument against the + belief that self-sterility has been acquired to prevent + self-fertilisation, is the immediate and powerful effect of changed + conditions in either causing or in removing self-sterility. We are not + therefore justified in admitting that this peculiar state of the + reproductive system has been gradually acquired through natural selection; + but we must look at it as an incidental result, dependent on the + conditions to which the plants have been subjected, like the ordinary + sterility caused in the case of animals by confinement, and in the case of + plants by too much manure, heat, etc. I do not, however, wish to maintain + that self-sterility may not sometimes be of service to a plant in + preventing self-fertilisation; but there are so many other means by which + this result might be prevented or rendered difficult, including as we + shall see in the next chapter the prepotency of pollen from a distinct + individual over a plant’s own pollen, that self-sterility seems an almost + superfluous acquirement for this purpose. + </p> + <p> + Finally, the most interesting point in regard to self-sterile plants is + the evidence which they afford of the advantage, or rather of the + necessity, of some degree or kind of differentiation in the sexual + elements, in order that they should unite and give birth to a new being. + It was ascertained that the five plants of Reseda odorata which were + selected by chance, could be perfectly fertilised by pollen taken from any + one of them, but not by their own pollen; and a few additional trials were + made with some other individuals, which I have not thought worth + recording. So again, Hildebrand and Fritz Muller frequently speak of + self-sterile plants being fertile with the pollen of any other individual; + and if there had been any exceptions to the rule, these could hardly have + escaped their observation and my own. We may therefore confidently assert + that a self-sterile plant can be fertilised by the pollen of any one out + of a thousand or ten thousand individuals of the same species, but not by + its own. Now it is obviously impossible that the sexual organs and + elements of every individual can have been specialised with respect to + every other individual. But there is no difficulty in believing that the + sexual elements of each differ slightly in the same diversified manner as + do their external characters; and it has often been remarked that no two + individuals are absolutely alike. Therefore we can hardly avoid the + conclusion, that differences of an analogous and indefinite nature in the + reproductive system are sufficient to excite the mutual action of the + sexual elements, and that unless there be such differentiation fertility + fails. + </p> + <h3> + THE APPEARANCE OF HIGHLY SELF-FERTILE VARIETIES. + </h3> + <p> + We have just seen that the degree to which flowers are capable of being + fertilised with their own pollen differs much, both with the species of + the same genus, and sometimes with the individuals of the same species. + Some allied cases of the appearance of varieties which, when + self-fertilised, yield more seed and produce offspring growing taller than + their self-fertilised parents, or than the intercrossed plants of the + corresponding generation, will now be considered. + </p> + <p> + Firstly, in the third and fourth generations of Mimulus luteus, a tall + variety, often alluded to, having large white flowers blotched with + crimson, appeared amongst both the intercrossed and self-fertilised + plants. It prevailed in all the later self-fertilised generations to the + exclusion of every other variety, and transmitted its characters + faithfully, but disappeared from the intercrossed plants, owing no doubt + to their characters being repeatedly blended by crossing. The + self-fertilised plants belonging to this variety were not only taller, but + more fertile than the intercrossed plants; though these latter in the + earlier generations were much taller and more fertile than the + self-fertilised plants. Thus in the fifth generation the self-fertilised + plants were to the intercrossed in height as 126 to 100. In the sixth + generation they were likewise much taller and finer plants, but were not + actually measured; they produced capsules compared with those on the + intercrossed plants, in number, as 147 to 100; and the self-fertilised + capsules contained a greater number of seeds. In the seventh generation + the self-fertilised plants were to the crossed in height as 137 to 100; + and twenty flowers on these self-fertilised plants fertilised with their + own pollen yielded nineteen very fine capsules,—a degree of + self-sterility which I have not seen equalled in any other case. This + variety seems to have become specially adapted to profit in every way by + self-fertilisation, although this process was so injurious to the + parent-plants during the first four generations. It should however be + remembered that seedlings raised from this variety, when crossed by a + fresh stock, were wonderfully superior in height and fertility to the + self-fertilised plants of the corresponding generation. + </p> + <p> + Secondly, in the sixth self-fertilised generation of Ipomoea a single + plant named the Hero appeared, which exceeded by a little in height its + intercrossed opponent,—a case which had not occurred in any previous + generation. Hero transmitted the peculiar colour of its flowers, as well + as its increased tallness and a high degree of self-fertility, to its + children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. The self-fertilised + children of Hero were in height to other self-fertilised plants of the + same stock as 100 to 85. Ten self-fertilised capsules produced by the + grandchildren contained on an average 5.2 seeds; and this is a higher + average than was yielded in any other generation by the capsules of + self-fertilised flowers. The great-grandchildren of Hero derived from a + cross with a fresh stock were so unhealthy, from having been grown at an + unfavourable season, that their average height in comparison with that of + the self-fertilised plants cannot be judged of with any safety; but it did + not appear that they had profited even by a cross of this kind. + </p> + <p> + Thirdly, the plants of Nicotiana on which I experimented appear to come + under the present class of cases; for they varied in their sexual + constitution and were more or less highly self-fertile. They were probably + the offspring of plants which had been spontaneously self-fertilised under + glass for several generations in this country. The flowers on the + parent-plants which were first fertilised by me with their own pollen + yielded half again as many seeds as did those which were crossed; and the + seedlings raised from these self-fertilised seeds exceeded in height those + raised from the crossed seeds to an extraordinary degree. In the second + and third generations, although the self-fertilised plants did not exceed + the crossed in height, yet their self-fertilised flowers yielded on two + occasions considerably more seeds than the crossed flowers, even than + those which were crossed with pollen from a distinct stock or variety. + </p> + <p> + Lastly, as certain individual plants of Reseda odorata and lutea are + incomparably more self-fertile than other individuals, the former might be + included under the present heading of the appearance of new and highly + self-fertile varieties. But in this case we should have to look at these + two species as normally self-sterile; and this, judging by my experience, + appears to be the correct view. + </p> + <p> + We may therefore conclude from the facts now given, that varieties + sometimes arise which when self-fertilised possess an increased power of + producing seeds and of growing to a greater height, than the intercrossed + or self-fertilised plants of the corresponding generation—all the + plants being of course subjected to the same conditions. The appearance of + such varieties is interesting, as it bears on the existence under nature + of plants which regularly fertilise themselves, such as Ophrys apifera and + a few other orchids, or as Leersia oryzoides, which produces an abundance + of cleistogene flowers, but most rarely flowers capable of + cross-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + Some observations made on other plants lead me to suspect that + self-fertilisation is in some respects beneficial; although the benefit + thus derived is as a rule very small compared with that from a cross with + a distinct plant. Thus we have seen in the last chapter that seedlings of + Ipomoea and Mimulus raised from flowers fertilised with their own pollen, + which is the strictest possible form of self-fertilisation, were superior + in height, weight, and in early flowering to the seedlings raised from + flowers crossed with pollen from other flowers on the same plant; and this + superiority apparently was too strongly marked to be accidental. Again, + the cultivated varieties of the common pea are highly self-fertile, + although they have been self-fertilised for many generations; and they + exceeded in height seedlings from a cross between two plants belonging to + the same variety in the ratio of 115 to 100; but then only four pairs of + plants were measured and compared. The self-fertility of Primula veris + increased after several generations of illegitimate fertilisation, which + is a process closely analogous to self-fertilisation, but only as long as + the plants were cultivated under the same favourable conditions. I have + also elsewhere shown that with Primula veris and sinensis, equal-styled + varieties occasionally appear which possess the sexual organs of the two + forms combined in the same flower. (9/16. ‘Journal of the Linnean Society + Botany’ volume 10 1867 pages 417, 419.) Consequently they fertilise + themselves in a legitimate manner and are highly self-fertile; but the + remarkable fact is that they are rather more fertile than ordinary plants + of the same species legitimately fertilised by pollen from a distinct + individual. Formerly it appeared to me probable, that the increased + fertility of these dimorphic plants might be accounted for by the stigma + lying so close to the anthers that it was impregnated at the most + favourable age and time of the day; but this explanation is not applicable + to the above given cases, in which the flowers were artificially + fertilised with their own pollen. + </p> + <p> + Considering the facts now adduced, including the appearance of those + varieties which are more fertile and taller than their parents and than + the intercrossed plants of the corresponding generation, it is difficult + to avoid the suspicion that self-fertilisation is in some respects + advantageous; though if this be really the case, any such advantage is as + a rule quite insignificant compared with that from a cross with a distinct + plant, and especially with one of a fresh stock. Should this suspicion be + hereafter verified, it would throw light, as we shall see in the next + chapter, on the existence of plants bearing small and inconspicuous + flowers which are rarely visited by insects, and therefore are rarely + intercrossed. + </p> + <p> + RELATIVE WEIGHT AND PERIOD OF GERMINATION OF SEEDS FROM CROSSED AND + SELF-FERTILISED FLOWERS. + </p> + <p> + An equal number of seeds from flowers fertilised with pollen from another + plant, and from flowers fertilised with their own pollen, were weighed, + but only in sixteen cases. Their relative weights are given in the + following list; that of the seeds from the crossed flowers being taken as + 100. + </p> + <p> + Column 1: Name of Plant. + </p> + <p> + Column 2: x, in the expression, 100 to x. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea (parent plants): 127. Ipomoea purpurea (third + generation): 87. Salvia coccinea: 100. Brassica oleracea: 103. Iberis + umbellata (second generation): 136. Delphinium consolida: 45. Hibiscus + africanus: 105. Tropaeolum minus: 115. Lathyrus odoratus (about): 100. + Sarothamnus scoparius: 88. Specularia speculum: 86. Nemophila insignis: + 105. Borago officinalis: 111. Cyclamen persicum (about): 50. Fagopyrum + esculentum: 82. Canna warscewiczi (3 generations): 102. + </p> + <p> + It is remarkable that in ten out of these sixteen cases the + self-fertilised seeds were either superior or equal to the crossed in + weight; nevertheless, in six out of the ten cases (namely, with Ipomoea, + Salvia, Brassica, Tropaeolum, Lathyrus, and Nemophila) the plants raised + from these self-fertilised seeds were very inferior in height and in other + respects to those raised from the crossed seeds. The superiority in weight + of the self-fertilised seeds in at least six out of the ten cases, namely, + with Brassica, Hibiscus, Tropaeolum, Nemophila, Borago, and Canna, may be + accounted for in part by the self-fertilised capsules containing fewer + seeds; for when a capsule contains only a few seeds, these will be apt to + be better nourished, so as to be heavier, than when many are contained in + the same capsule. It should, however, be observed that in some of the + above cases, in which the crossed seeds were the heaviest, as with + Sarothamnus and Cyclamen, the crossed capsules contained a larger number + of seeds. Whatever may be the explanation of the self-fertilised seeds + being often the heaviest, it is remarkable in the case of Brassica, + Tropaeolum, Nemophila, and of the first generation of Ipomoea, that the + seedlings raised from them were inferior in height and in other respects + to the seedlings raised from the crossed seeds. This fact shows how + superior in constitutional vigour the crossed seedlings must have been, + for it cannot be doubted that heavy and fine seeds tend to yield the + finest plants. Mr. Galton has shown that this holds good with Lathyrus + odoratus; as has Mr. A.J. Wilson with the Swedish turnip, Brassica + campestris ruta baga. Mr. Wilson separated the largest and smallest seeds + of this latter plant, the ratio between the weights of the two lots being + as 100 to 59, and he found that the seedlings “from the larger seeds took + the lead and maintained their superiority to the last, both in height and + thickness of stem.” (9/17. ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1867 page 107. + Loiseleur-Deslongchamp ‘Les Cereales’ 1842 pages 208-219, was led by his + observations to the extraordinary conclusion that the smaller grains of + cereals produce as fine plants as the large. This conclusion is, however, + contradicted by Major Hallet’s great success in improving wheat by the + selection of the finest grains. It is possible, however, that man, by + long-continued selection, may have given to the grains of the cereals a + greater amount of starch or other matter, than the seedlings can utilise + for their growth. There can be little doubt, as Humboldt long ago + remarked, that the grains of cereals have been rendered attractive to + birds in a degree which is highly injurious to the species.) Nor can this + difference in the growth of the seedling turnips be attributed to the + heavier seeds having been of crossed, and the lighter of self-fertilised + origin, for it is known that plants belonging to this genus are habitually + intercrossed by insects. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the relative period of germination of crossed and + self-fertilised seeds, a record was kept in only twenty-one cases; and the + results are very perplexing. Neglecting one case in which the two lots + germinated simultaneously, in ten cases or exactly one-half many of the + self-fertilised seeds germinated before the crossed, and in the other half + many of the crossed before the self-fertilised. In four out of these + twenty cases, seeds derived from a cross with a fresh stock were compared + with self-fertilised seeds from one of the later self-fertilised + generations; and here again in half the cases the crossed seeds, and in + the other half the self-fertilised seeds, germinated first. Yet the + seedlings of Mimulus raised from such self-fertilised seeds were inferior + in all respects to the crossed seedlings, and in the case of Eschscholtzia + they were inferior in fertility. Unfortunately the relative weight of the + two lots of seeds was ascertained in only a few instances in which their + germination was observed; but with Ipomoea and I believe with some of the + other species, the relative lightness of the self-fertilised seeds + apparently determined their early germination, probably owing to the + smaller mass being favourable to the more rapid completion of the chemical + and morphological changes necessary for germination. On the other hand, + Mr. Galton gave me seeds (no doubt all self-fertilised) of Lathyrus + odoratus, which were divided into two lots of heavier and lighter seeds; + and several of the former germinated first. It is evident that many more + observations are necessary before anything can be decided with respect to + the relative period of germination of crossed and self-fertilised seeds. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0010" id="link2HCH0010"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER X. MEANS OF FERTILISATION. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Sterility and fertility of plants when insects are excluded. + The means by which flowers are cross-fertilised. + Structures favourable to self-fertilisation. + Relation between the structure and conspicuousness of flowers, the + visits of insects, and the advantages of cross-fertilisation. + The means by which flowers are fertilised with pollen from a distinct + plant. + Greater fertilising power of such pollen. + Anemophilous species. + Conversion of anemophilous species into entomophilous. + Origin of nectar. + Anemophilous plants generally have their sexes separated. + Conversion of diclinous into hermaphrodite flowers. + Trees often have their sexes separated. +</pre> + <p> + In the introductory chapter I briefly specified the various means by which + cross-fertilisation is favoured or ensured, namely, the separation of the + sexes,—the maturity of the male and female sexual elements at + different periods,—the heterostyled or dimorphic and trimorphic + condition of certain plants,—many mechanical contrivances,—the + more or less complete inefficiency of a flower’s own pollen on the stigma,—and + the prepotency of pollen from any other individual over that from the same + plant. Some of these points require further consideration; but for full + details I must refer the reader to the several excellent works mentioned + in the introduction. I will in the first place give two lists: the first, + of plants which are either quite sterile or produce less than about half + the full complement of seeds, when insects are excluded; and a second list + of plants which, when thus treated, are fully fertile or produce at least + half the full complement of seeds. These lists have been compiled from the + several previous tables, with some additional cases from my own + observations and those of others. The species are arranged nearly in the + order followed by Lindley in his ‘Vegetable Kingdom.’ The reader should + observe that the sterility or fertility of the plants in these two lists + depends on two wholly distinct causes; namely, the absence or presence of + the proper means by which pollen is applied to the stigma, and its less or + greater efficiency when thus applied. As it is obvious that with plants in + which the sexes are separate, pollen must be carried by some means from + flower to flower, such species are excluded from the lists; as are + likewise dimorphic and trimorphic plants, in which the same necessity + occurs to a limited extent. Experience has proved to me that, + independently of the exclusion of insects, the seed-bearing power of a + plant is not lessened by covering it while in flower under a thin net + supported on a frame; and this might indeed have been inferred from the + consideration of the two following lists, as they include a considerable + number of species belonging to the same genera, some of which are quite + sterile and others quite fertile when protected by a net from the access + of insects. + </p> + <p> + [LIST OF PLANTS WHICH, WHEN INSECTS ARE EXCLUDED, ARE EITHER QUITE + STERILE, OR PRODUCE, AS FAR AS I COULD JUDGE, LESS THAN HALF THE NUMBER OF + SEEDS PRODUCED BY UNPROTECTED PLANTS. + </p> + <p> + Passiflora alata, racemosa, coerulea, edulis, laurifolia, and some + individuals of P. quadrangularis (Passifloraceae), are quite sterile under + these conditions: see ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under + Domestication’ chapter 17 2nd edition volume 2 page 118. + </p> + <p> + Viola canina (Violaceae).—Perfect flowers quite sterile unless + fertilised by bees, or artificially fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Viola tricolor.—Sets very few and poor capsules. + </p> + <p> + Reseda odorata (Resedaceae).—Some individuals quite sterile. + </p> + <p> + Reseda lutea.—Some individuals produce very few and poor capsules. + </p> + <p> + Abutilon darwinii (Malvaceae).—Quite sterile in Brazil: see previous + discussion on self-sterile plants. + </p> + <p> + Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae).—Professor Caspary informs me that some of + the species are quite sterile if insects are excluded. + </p> + <p> + Euryale amazonica (Nymphaeaceae).—Mr. J. Smith, of Kew, informs me + that capsules from flowers left to themselves, and probably not visited by + insects, contained from eight to fifteen seeds; those from flowers + artificially fertilised with pollen from other flowers on the same plant + contained from fifteen to thirty seeds; and that two flowers fertilised + with pollen brought from another plant at Chatsworth contained + respectively sixty and seventy-five seeds. I have given these statements + because Professor Caspary advances this plant as a case opposed to the + doctrine of the necessity or advantage of cross-fertilisation: see + Sitzungsberichte der Phys.-okon. Gesell.zu Konigsberg, B.6 page 20.) + </p> + <p> + Delphinium consolida (Ranunculaceae).—Produces many capsules, but + these contain only about half the number of seeds compared with capsules + from flowers naturally fertilised by bees. + </p> + <p> + Eschscholtzia californica (Papaveraceae).—Brazilian plants quite + sterile: English plants produce a few capsules. + </p> + <p> + Papaver vagum (Papaveraceae).—In the early part of the summer + produced very few capsules, and these contained very few seeds. + </p> + <p> + Papaver alpinum.—H. Hoffmann (‘Speciesfrage’ 1875 page 47) states + that this species produced seeds capable of germination only on one + occasion. + </p> + <p> + Corydalis cava (Fumariaceae).—Sterile: see the previous discussion + on self-sterile plants. + </p> + <p> + Corydalis solida.—I had a single plant in my garden (1863), and saw + many hive-bees sucking the flowers, but not a single seed was produced. I + was much surprised at this fact, as Professor Hildebrand’s discovery that + C. cava is sterile with its own pollen had not then been made. He likewise + concludes from the few experiments which he made on the present species + that it is self-sterile. The two foregoing cases are interesting, because + botanists formerly thought (see, for instance, Lecoq, ‘De la Fecondation + et de l’Hybridation’ 1845 page 61 and Lindley ‘Vegetable Kingdom’ 1853 + page 436) that all the species of the Fumariaceae were specially adapted + for self-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + Corydalis lutea.—A covered-up plant produced (1861) exactly half as + many capsules as an exposed plant of the same size growing close + alongside. When humble-bees visit the flowers (and I repeatedly saw them + thus acting) the lower petals suddenly spring downwards and the pistil + upwards; this is due to the elasticity of the parts, which takes effect, + as soon as the coherent edges of the hood are separated by the entrance of + an insect. Unless insects visit the flowers the parts do not move. + Nevertheless, many of the flowers on the plants which I had protected + produced capsules, notwithstanding that their petals and pistils still + retained their original position; and I found to my surprise that these + capsules contained more seeds than those from flowers, the petals of which + had been artificially separated and allowed to spring apart. Thus, nine + capsules produced by undisturbed flowers contained fifty-three seeds; + whilst nine capsules from flowers, the petals of which had been + artificially separated, contained only thirty-two seeds. But we should + remember that if bees had been permitted to visit these flowers, they + would have visited them at the best time for fertilisation. The flowers, + the petals of which had been artificially separated, set their capsules + before those which were left undisturbed under the net. To show with what + certainty the flowers are visited by bees, I may add that on one occasion + all the flowers on some unprotected plants were examined, and every single + one had its petals separated; and, on a second occasion, forty-one out of + forty-three flowers were in this state. Hildebrand states (Pring. Jahr. f. + wiss. Botanik, B. 7 page 450) that the mechanism of the parts in this + species is nearly the same as in C. ochroleuca, which he has fully + described. + </p> + <p> + Hypecoum grandiflorum (Fumariaceae).—Highly self-sterile + (Hildebrand, ibid.). + </p> + <p> + Kalmia latifolia (Ericaceae).—Mr. W.J. Beal says (‘American + Naturalist’ 1867) that flowers protected from insects wither and drop off, + with “most of the anthers still remaining in the pockets.” + </p> + <p> + Pelargonium zonale (Geraniaceae).—Almost sterile; one plant produced + two fruits. It is probable that different varieties would differ in this + respect, as some are only feebly dichogamous. + </p> + <p> + Dianthus caryophyllus (Caryophyllaceae).—Produces very few capsules + which contain any good seeds. + </p> + <p> + Phaseolus multiflorus (Leguminosae).—Plants protected from insects + produced on two occasions about one-third and one-eighth of the full + number of seeds: see my article in ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1857 page 225 + and 1858 page 828; also ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ 3rd + series volume 2 1858 page 462. Dr. Ogle (‘Popular Science Review’ 1870 + page 168) found that a plant was quite sterile when covered up. The + flowers are not visited by insects in Nicaragua, and, according to Mr. + Belt, the species is there quite sterile: ‘The Naturalist in Nicaragua’ + page 70. + </p> + <p> + Vicia faba (Leguminosae).—Seventeen covered-up plants yielded 40 + beans, whilst seventeen plants left unprotected and growing close + alongside produced 135 beans; these latter plants were, therefore, between + three and four times more fertile than the protected plants: see + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ for fuller details, 1858 page 828. + </p> + <p> + Erythrina (sp.?) (Leguminosae).—Sir W. MacArthur informed me that in + New South Wales the flowers do not set, unless the petals are moved in the + same manner as is done by insects. + </p> + <p> + Lathyrus grandiflorus (Leguminosae).—Is in this country more or less + sterile. It never sets pods unless the flowers are visited by humble-bees + (and this happens only rarely), or unless they are artificially + fertilised: see my article in ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1858 page 828. + </p> + <p> + Sarothamnus scoparius (Leguminosae).—Extremely sterile when the + flowers are neither visited by bees, nor disturbed by being beaten by the + wind against the surrounding net. + </p> + <p> + Melilotus officinalis (Leguminosae).—An unprotected plant visited by + bees produced at least thirty times more seeds than a protected one. On + this latter plant many scores of racemes did not produce a single pod; + several racemes produced each one or two pods; five produced three; six + produced four; and one produced six pods. On the unprotected plant each of + several racemes produced fifteen pods; nine produced between sixteen and + twenty-two pods, and one produced thirty pods. + </p> + <p> + Lotus corniculatus (Leguminosae).—Several covered-up plants produced + only two empty pods, and not a single good seed. + </p> + <p> + Trifolium repens (Leguminosae).—Several plants were protected from + insects, and the seeds from ten flowers-heads on these plants, and from + ten heads on other plants growing outside the net (which I saw visited by + bees), were counted; and the seeds from the latter plants were very nearly + ten times as numerous as those from the protected plants. The experiment + was repeated on the following year; and twenty protected heads now yielded + only a single aborted seed, whilst twenty heads on the plants outside the + net (which I saw visited by bees) yielded 2290 seeds, as calculated by + weighing all the seed, and counting the number in a weight of two grains. + </p> + <p> + Trifolium pratense.—One hundred flower-heads on plants protected by + a net did not produce a single seed, whilst 100 heads on plants growing + outside, which were visited by bees, yielded 68 grains weight of seeds; + and as eighty seeds weighed two grains, the 100 heads must have yielded + 2720 seeds. I have often watched this plant, and have never seen hive-bees + sucking the flowers, except from the outside through holes bitten by + humble-bees, or deep down between the flowers, as if in search of some + secretion from the calyx, almost in the same manner as described by Mr. + Farrer, in the case of Coronilla (‘Nature’ 1874 July 2 page 169). I must, + however, except one occasion, when an adjoining field of sainfoin + (Hedysarum onobrychis) had just been cut down, and when the bees seemed + driven to desperation. On this occasion most of the flowers of the clover + were somewhat withered, and contained an extraordinary quantity of nectar, + which the bees were able to suck. An experienced apiarian, Mr. Miner, says + that in the United States hive-bees never suck the red clover; and Mr. R. + Colgate informs me that he has observed the same fact in New Zealand after + the introduction of the hive-bee into that island. On the other hand, H. + Muller (‘Befruchtung’ page 224) has often seen hive-bees visiting this + plant in Germany, for the sake both of pollen and nectar, which latter + they obtained by breaking apart the petals. It is at least certain that + humble-bees are the chief fertilisers of the common red clover. + </p> + <p> + Trifolium incarnatum.—The flower-heads containing ripe seeds, on + some covered and uncovered plants, appeared equally fine, but this was a + false appearance; 60 heads on the latter yielded 349 grains weight of + seeds, whereas 60 on the covered-up plants yielded only 63 grains, and + many of the seeds in the latter lot were poor and aborted. Therefore the + flowers which were visited by bees produced between five and six times as + many seeds as those which were protected. The covered-up plants not having + been much exhausted by seed-bearing, bore a second considerable crop of + flower-stems, whilst the exposed plants did not do so. + </p> + <p> + Cytisus laburnum (Leguminosae).—Seven flower-racemes ready to expand + were enclosed in a large bag made of net, and they did not seem in the + least injured by this treatment. Only three of them produced any pods, + each a single one; and these three pods contained one, four, and five + seeds. So that only a single pod from the seven racemes included a fair + complement of seeds. + </p> + <p> + Cuphea purpurea (Lythraceae).—Produced no seeds. Other flowers on + the same plant artificially fertilised under the net yielded seeds. + </p> + <p> + Vinca major (Apocynaceae).—Is generally quite sterile, but sometimes + sets seeds when artificially cross-fertilised: see my notice ‘Gardeners’ + Chronicle’ 1861 page 552. + </p> + <p> + Vinca rosea.—Behaves in the same manner as the last species: + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1861 page 699, 736, 831. + </p> + <p> + Tabernaemontana echinata (Apocynaceae).—Quite sterile. + </p> + <p> + Petunia violacea (Solanaceae).—Quite sterile, as far as I have + observed. + </p> + <p> + Solanum tuberosum (Solanaceae).—Tinzmann says (‘Gardeners’ + Chronicle’ 1846 page 183) that some varieties are quite sterile unless + fertilised by pollen from another variety. + </p> + <p> + Primula scotica (Primulaceae).—A non-dimorphic species, which is + fertile with its own pollen, but is extremely sterile if insects are + excluded. J. Scott in ‘Journal of the Linnean Society Botany’ volume 8 + 1864 page 119. + </p> + <p> + Cortusa matthioli (Primulaceae).—Protected plants completely + sterile; artificially self-fertilised flowers perfectly fertile. J. Scott + ibid. page 84. + </p> + <p> + Cyclamen persicum (Primulaceae).—During one season several + covered-up plants did not produce a single seed. + </p> + <p> + Borago officinalis (Boraginaceae).—Protected plants produced about + half as many seeds as the unprotected. + </p> + <p> + Salvia tenori (Labiatae).—Quite sterile; but two or three flowers on + the summits of three of the spikes, which touched the net when the wind + blew, produced a few seeds. This sterility was not due to the injurious + effects of the net, for I fertilised five flowers with pollen from an + adjoining plant, and these all yielded fine seeds. I removed the net, + whilst one little branch still bore a few not completely faded flowers, + and these were visited by bees and yielded seeds. + </p> + <p> + Salvia coccinea.—Some covered-up plants produced a good many fruits, + but not, I think, half as many as did the uncovered plants; twenty-eight + of the fruits spontaneously produced by the protected plant contained on + an average only 1.45 seeds, whilst some artificially self-fertilised + fruits on the same plant contained more than twice as many, namely 3.3 + seeds. + </p> + <p> + Bignonia (unnamed species) (Bignoniaceae).—Quite sterile: see my + account of self-sterile plants. + </p> + <p> + Digitalis purpurea (Scrophulariaceae).—Extremely sterile, only a few + poor capsules being produced. + </p> + <p> + Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae).—Extremely sterile. + </p> + <p> + Antirrhinum majus, red var. (Scrophulariaceae).—Fifty pods gathered + from a large plant under a net contained 9.8 grains weight of seeds; but + many (unfortunately not counted) of the fifty pods contained no seeds. + Fifty pods on a plant fully exposed to the visits of humble-bees contained + 23.1 grains weight of seed, that is, more than twice the weight; but in + this case again, several of the fifty pods contained no seeds. + </p> + <p> + Antirrhinum majus (white var., with a pink mouth to the corolla).—Fifty + pods, of which only a very few were empty, on a covered-up plant contained + 20 grains weight of seed; so that this variety seems to be much more + self-fertile than the previous one. With Dr. W. Ogle (‘Popular Science + Review’ January 1870 page 52) a plant of this species was much more + sterile when protected from insects than with me, for it produced only two + small capsules. As showing the efficiency of bees, I may add that Mr. + Crocker castrated some young flowers and left them uncovered; and these + produced as many seeds as the unmutilated flowers. + </p> + <p> + Antirrhinum majus (peloric var.).—This variety is quite fertile when + artificially fertilised with its own pollen, but is utterly sterile when + left to itself and uncovered, as humble-bees cannot crawl into the narrow + tubular flowers. + </p> + <p> + Verbascum phoeniceum (Scrophulariaceae).—Quite sterile. See my + account of self-sterile plants. + </p> + <p> + Verbascum nigrum.—Quite sterile. See my account of self-sterile + plants. + </p> + <p> + Campanula carpathica (Lobeliaceae).—Quite sterile. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia ramosa (Lobeliaceae).—Quite sterile. + </p> + <p> + Lobelia fulgens.—This plant is never visited in my garden by bees, + and is quite sterile; but in a nursery-garden at a few miles’ distance I + saw humble-bees visiting the flowers, and they produced some capsules. + </p> + <p> + Isotoma (a white-flowered var.) (Lobeliaceae).—Five plants left + unprotected in my greenhouse produced twenty-four fine capsules, + containing altogether 12.2 grains weight of seed, and thirteen other very + poor capsules, which were rejected. Five plants protected from insects, + but otherwise exposed to the same conditions as the above plants, produced + sixteen fine capsules, and twenty other very poor and rejected ones. The + sixteen fine capsules contained seeds by weight in such proportion that + twenty-four would have yielded 4.66 grains. So that the unprotected plants + produced nearly thrice as many seeds by weight as the protected plants. + </p> + <p> + Leschenaultia formosa (Goodeniaceae).—Quite sterile. My experiments + on this plant, showing the necessity of insect aid, are given in the + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1871 page 1166. + </p> + <p> + Senecio cruentus (Compositae).—Quite sterile: see my account of + self-sterile plants. + </p> + <p> + Heterocentron mexicanum (Malastomaceae).—Quite sterile; but this + species and the following members of the group produce plenty of seed when + artificially self-fertilised. + </p> + <p> + Rhexia glandulosa (Melastomaceae).—Set spontaneously only two or + three capsules. + </p> + <p> + Centradenia floribunda (Melastomaceae).—During some years produced + spontaneously two or three capsules, sometimes none. + </p> + <p> + Pleroma (unnamed species from Kew) (Melastomaceae).—During some + years produced spontaneously two or three capsules, sometimes none. + </p> + <p> + Monochaetum ensiferum (Melastomaceae).—During some years produced + spontaneously two or three capsules, sometimes none. + </p> + <p> + Hedychium (unnamed species) (Marantaceae).—Almost self-sterile + without aid. + </p> + <p> + Orchideae.—An immense proportion of the species sterile, if insects + are excluded. + </p> + <p> + PLANTS, WHICH WHEN PROTECTED FROM INSECTS ARE EITHER QUITE FERTILE, OR + YIELD MORE THAN HALF THE NUMBER OF SEEDS PRODUCED BY UNPROTECTED PLANTS. + </p> + <p> + Passiflora gracilis (Passifloraceae).—Produces many fruits, but + these contain fewer seeds than fruits from intercrossed flowers. + </p> + <p> + Brassica oleracea (Cruciferae).—Produces many capsules, but these + generally not so rich in seed as those on uncovered plants. + </p> + <p> + Raphanus sativus (Cruciferae).—Half of a large branching plant was + covered by a net, and was as thickly covered with capsules as the other + and unprotected half; but twenty of the capsules on the latter contained + on an average 3.5 seeds, whilst twenty of the protected capsules contained + only 1.85 seeds, that is, only a little more than half the number. This + plant might perhaps have been more properly included in the former list. + </p> + <p> + Iberis umbellata (Cruciferae).—Highly fertile. + </p> + <p> + Iberis amara.—Highly fertile. + </p> + <p> + Reseda odorata and lutea (Resedaceae).—Certain individuals + completely self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Euryale ferox (Nymphaeaceae).—Professor Caspary informs me that this + plant is highly self-fertile when insects are excluded. He remarks in the + paper before referred to, that his plants (as well as those of the + Victoria regia) produce only one flower at a time; and that as this + species is an annual, and was introduced in 1809, it must have been + self-fertilised for the last fifty-six generations; but Dr. Hooker assures + me that to his knowledge it has been repeatedly introduced, and that at + Kew the same plant both of the Euryale and of the Victoria produce several + flowers at the same time. + </p> + <p> + Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae).—Some species, as I am informed by Professor + Caspary, are quite self-fertile when insects are excluded. + </p> + <p> + Adonis aestivalis (Ranunculaceae).—Produces, according to Professor + H. Hoffmann (‘Speciesfrage’ page 11), plenty of seeds when protected from + insects. + </p> + <p> + Ranunculus acris (Ranunculaceae).—Produces plenty of seeds under a + net. + </p> + <p> + Papaver somniferum (Papaveraceae).—Thirty capsules from uncovered + plants yielded 15.6 grains weight of seed, and thirty capsules from + covered-up plants, growing in the same bed, yielded 16.5 grains weight; so + that the latter plants were more productive than the uncovered. Professor + H. Hoffmann (‘Speciesfrage’ 1875 page 53) also found this species + self-fertile when protected from insects. + </p> + <p> + Papaver vagum.—Produced late in the summer plenty of seeds, which + germinated well. + </p> + <p> + Papaver argemonoides.—According to Hildebrand (‘Jahrbuch fur w. + Bot.’ B.7 page 466), spontaneously self-fertilised flowers are by no means + sterile. + </p> + <p> + Glaucium luteum (Papaveraceae).—According to Hildebrand (‘Jahrbuch + fur w. Bot.’ B.7 page 466), spontaneously self-fertilised flowers are by + no means sterile. + </p> + <p> + Argemone ochroleuca (Papaveraceae).—According to Hildebrand + (‘Jahrbuch fur w. Bot.’ B.7 page 466), spontaneously self-fertilised + flowers are by no means sterile. + </p> + <p> + Adlumia cirrhosa (Fumariaceae).—Sets an abundance of capsules. + </p> + <p> + Hypecoum procumbens (Fumariaceae).—Hildebrand says (idem), with + respect to protected flowers, that “eine gute Fruchtbildung eintrete.” + </p> + <p> + Fumaria officinalis (Fumariaceae).—Covered-up and unprotected plants + apparently produced an equal number of capsules, and the seeds of the + former seemed to the eye equally good. I have often watched this plant, + and so has Hildebrand, and we have never seen an insect visit the flowers. + Hermann Muller has likewise been struck with the rarity of the visits of + insects to it, though he has sometimes seen hive-bees at work. The flowers + may perhaps be visited by small moths, as is probably the case with the + following species. + </p> + <p> + Fumaria capreolata.—Several large beds of this plant growing wild + were watched by me during many days, but the flowers were never visited by + any insects, though a humble-bee was once seen closely to inspect them. + Nevertheless, as the nectary contains much nectar, especially in the + evening, I felt convinced that they were visited, probably by moths. The + petals do not naturally separate or open in the least; but they had been + opened by some means in a certain proportion of the flowers, in the same + manner as follows when a thick bristle is pushed into the nectary; so that + in this respect they resemble the flowers of Corydalis lutea. Thirty-four + heads, each including many flowers, were examined, and twenty of them had + from one to four flowers, whilst fourteen had not a single flower thus + opened. It is therefore clear that some of the flowers had been visited by + insects, while the majority had not; yet almost all produced capsules. + </p> + <p> + Linum usitatissimum (Linaceae).—Appears to be quite fertile. H. + Hoffmann ‘Botanische Zeitung’ 1876 page 566. + </p> + <p> + Impatiens barbigerum (Balsaminaceae).—The flowers, though + excellently adapted for cross-fertilisation by the bees which freely visit + them, set abundantly under a net. + </p> + <p> + Impatiens noli-me-tangere (Balsaminaceae).—This species produces + cleistogene and perfect flowers. A plant was covered with a net, and some + perfect flowers, marked with threads, produced eleven spontaneously + self-fertilised capsules, which contained on an average 3.45 seeds. I + neglected to ascertain the number of seeds produced by perfect flowers + exposed to the visits of insects, but I believe it is not greatly in + excess of the above average. Mr. A.W. Bennett has carefully described the + structure of the flowers of I. fulva in ‘Journal of the Linnean Society’ + volume 13 Bot. 1872 page 147. This latter species is said to be sterile + with its own pollen (‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1868 page 1286), and if so, it + presents a remarkable contrast with I. barbigerum and noli-me-tangere. + </p> + <p> + Limnanthes douglasii (Geraniaceae).—Highly fertile. + </p> + <p> + Viscaria oculata (Caryophyllaceae).—Produces plenty of capsules with + good seeds. + </p> + <p> + Stellaria media (Caryophyllaceae).—Covered-up and uncovered plants + produced an equal number of capsules, and the seeds in both appeared + equally numerous and good. + </p> + <p> + Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae).—Highly self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Vicia sativa (Leguminosae).—Protected and unprotected plants + produced an equal number of pods and equally fine seeds. If there was any + difference between the two lots, the covered-up plants were the most + productive. + </p> + <p> + Vicia hirsuta.—This species bears the smallest flowers of any + British leguminous plant. The result of covering up plants was exactly the + same as in the last species. + </p> + <p> + Pisum sativum (Leguminosae).—Fully fertile. + </p> + <p> + Lathyrus odoratus (Leguminosae).—Fully fertile. + </p> + <p> + Lathyrus nissolia.—Fully fertile. + </p> + <p> + Lupinus luteus (Leguminosae).—Fairly productive. + </p> + <p> + Lupinus pilosus.—Produced plenty of pods. + </p> + <p> + Ononis minutissima (Leguminosae).—Twelve perfect flowers on a plant + under a net were marked by threads, and produced eight pods, containing on + an average 2.38 seeds. Pods produced by flowers visited by insects would + probably have contained on an average 3.66 seeds, judging from the effects + of artificial cross-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + Phaseolus vulgaris (Leguminosae).—Quite fertile. + </p> + <p> + Trifolium arvense (Leguminosae).—The excessively small flowers are + incessantly visited by hive and humble-bees. When insects were excluded + the flower-heads seemed to produce as many and as fine seeds as the + exposed heads. + </p> + <p> + Trifolium procumbens.—On one occasion covered-up plants seemed to + yield as many seeds as the uncovered. On a second occasion sixty uncovered + flower-heads yielded 9.1 grains weight of seeds, whilst sixty heads on + protected plants yielded no less than 17.7 grains; so that these latter + plants were much more productive; but this result I suppose was + accidental. I have often watched this plant, and have never seen the + flowers visited by insects; but I suspect that the flowers of this + species, and more especially of Trifolium minus, are frequented by small + nocturnal moths which, as I hear from Mr. Bond, haunt the smaller clovers. + </p> + <p> + Medicago lupulina (Leguminosae).—On account of the danger of losing + the seeds, I was forced to gather the pods before they were quite ripe; + 150 flower-heads on plants visited by bees yielded pods weighing 101 + grains; whilst 150 heads on protected plants yielded pods weighing 77 + grains. The inequality would probably have been greater if the mature + seeds could have been all safely collected and compared. Ig. Urban + (Keimung, Bluthen, etc., bei Medicago 1873) has described the means of + fertilisation in this genus, as has the Reverend G. Henslow in the + ‘Journal of the Linnean Society Botany’ volume 9 1866 pages 327 and 355. + </p> + <p> + Nicotiana tabacum (Solanaceae).—Fully self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Ipomoea purpurea (Convolvulaceae).—Highly self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Leptosiphon androsaceus (Polemoniacae).—Plants under a net produced + a good many capsules. + </p> + <p> + Primula mollis (Primulaceae).—A non-dimorphic species, self-fertile: + J. Scott, in ‘Journal of the Linnean Society Botany’ volume 8 1864 page + 120. + </p> + <p> + Nolana prostrata (Nolanaceae).—Plants covered up in the greenhouse, + yielded seeds by weight compared with uncovered plants, the flowers of + which were visited by many bees, in the ratio of 100 to 61. + </p> + <p> + Ajuga reptans (Labiatae).—Set a good many seeds; but none of the + stems under a net produced so many as several uncovered stems growing + closely by. + </p> + <p> + Euphrasia officinalis (Scrophulariaceae).—Covered-up plants produced + plenty of seed; whether less than the exposed plants I cannot say. I saw + two small Dipterous insects (Dolichopos nigripennis and Empis chioptera) + repeatedly sucking the flowers; as they crawled into them, they rubbed + against the bristles which project from the anthers, and became dusted + with pollen. + </p> + <p> + Veronica agrestis (Scrophulariaceae).—Covered-up plants produced an + abundance of seeds. I do not know whether any insects visit the flowers; + but I have observed Syrphidae repeatedly covered with pollen visiting the + flowers of V. hederaefolia and chamoedrys. + </p> + <p> + Mimulus luteus (Scrophulariaceae).—Highly self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Calceolaria (greenhouse variety) (Scrophulariaceae).—Highly + self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae).—Highly self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Verbascum lychnitis.—Highly self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Vandellia nummularifolia (Scrophulariaceae).—Perfect flowers produce + a good many capsules. + </p> + <p> + Bartsia odontites (Scrophulariaceae).—Covered-up plants produced a + good many seeds; but several of these were shrivelled, nor were they so + numerous as those produced by unprotected plants, which were incessantly + visited by hive and humble-bees. + </p> + <p> + Specularia speculum (Lobeliaceae).—Covered plants produced almost as + many capsules as the uncovered. + </p> + <p> + Lactuca sativa (Compositae).—Covered plants produced some seeds, but + the summer was wet and unfavourable. + </p> + <p> + Galium aparine (Rubiaceae).—Covered plants produced quite as many + seeds as the uncovered. + </p> + <p> + Apium petroselinum (Umbelliferae).—Covered plants apparently were as + productive as the uncovered. + </p> + <p> + Zea mays (Gramineae).—A single plant in the greenhouse produced a + good many grains. + </p> + <p> + Canna warscewiczi (Marantaceae).—Highly self-fertile. + </p> + <p> + Orchidaceae.—In Europe Ophrys apifera is as regularly + self-fertilised as is any cleistogene flower. In the United States, South + Africa, and Australia there are a few species which are perfectly + self-fertile. These several cases are given in the second edition of my + work on the Fertilisation of Orchids. + </p> + <p> + Allium cepa (blood red var.) (Liliaceae).—Four flower-heads were + covered with a net, and they produced somewhat fewer and smaller capsules + than those on the uncovered heads. The capsules were counted on one + uncovered head, and were 289 in number; whilst those on a fine head from + under the net were only 199.] + </p> + <p> + Each of these lists contains by a mere accident the same number of genera, + namely, forty-nine. The genera in the first list include sixty-five + species, and those in the second sixty species; the Orchideae in both + being excluded. If the genera in this latter order, as well as in the + Asclepiadae and Apocynaceae, had been included, the number of species + which are sterile if insects are excluded would have been greatly + increased; but the lists are confined to species which were actually + experimented on. The results can be considered as only approximately + accurate, for fertility is so variable a character, that each species + ought to have been tried many times. The above number of species, namely, + 125, is as nothing to the host of living plants; but the mere fact of more + than half of them being sterile within the specified degree, when insects + are excluded, is a striking one; for whenever pollen has to be carried + from the anthers to the stigma in order to ensure full fertility, there is + at least a good chance of cross-fertilisation. I do not, however, believe + that if all known plants were tried in the same manner, half would be + found to be sterile within the specified limits; for many flowers were + selected for experiment which presented some remarkable structure; and + such flowers often require insect-aid. Thus out of the forty-nine genera + in the first list, about thirty-two have flowers which are asymmetrical or + present some remarkable peculiarity; whilst in the second list, including + species which are fully or moderately fertile when insects were excluded, + only about twenty-one out of the forty-nine are asymmetrical or present + any remarkable peculiarity. + </p> + <h3> + MEANS OF CROSS-FERTILISATION. + </h3> + <p> + The most important of all the means by which pollen is carried from the + anthers to the stigma of the same flower, or from flower to flower, are + insects, belonging to the orders of Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera; + and in some parts of the world, birds. (10/1. I will here give all the + cases known to me of birds fertilising flowers. In South Brazil, + humming-birds certainly fertilise the various species of Abutilon, which + are sterile without their aid (Fritz Muller ‘Jenaische Zeitschrift f. + Naturwiss.’ B. 7 1872 page 24.) Long-beaked humming-birds visit the + flowers of Brugmansia, whilst some of the short-beaked species often + penetrate its large corolla in order to obtain the nectar in an + illegitimate manner, in the same manner as do bees in all parts of the + world. It appears, indeed, that the beaks of humming-birds are specially + adapted to the various kinds of flowers which they visit: on the + Cordillera they suck the Salviae, and lacerate the flowers of the + Tacsoniae; in Nicaragua, Mr. Belt saw them sucking the flowers of + Marcgravia and Erythina, and thus they carried pollen from flower to + flower. In North America they are said to frequent the flowers of + Impatiens: (Gould ‘Introduction to the Trochilidae’ 1861 pages 15, 120; + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1869 page 389; ‘The Naturalist in Nicaragua’ page + 129; ‘Journal of the Linnean Society Botany’ volume 13 1872 page 151.) I + may add that I often saw in Chile a Mimus with its head yellow with pollen + from, as I believe, a Cassia. I have been assured that at the Cape of Good + Hope, Strelitzia is fertilised by the Nectarinidae. There can hardly be a + doubt that many Australian flowers are fertilised by the many + honey-sucking birds of that country. Mr. Wallace remarks (address to the + Biological Section, British Association 1876) that he has “often observed + the beaks and faces of the brush-tongued lories of the Moluccas covered + with pollen.” In New Zealand, many specimens of the Anthornis melanura had + their heads coloured with pollen from the flowers of an endemic species of + Fuchsia (Potts ‘Transactions of the New Zealand Institute’ volume 3 1870 + page 72.) Next in importance, but in a quite subordinate degree, is the + wind; and with some aquatic plants, according to Delpino, currents of + water. The simple fact of the necessity in many cases of extraneous aid + for the transport of the pollen, and the many contrivances for this + purpose, render it highly probable that some great benefit is thus gained; + and this conclusion has now been firmly established by the proved + superiority in growth, vigour, and fertility of plants of crossed + parentage over those of self-fertilised parentage. But we should always + keep in mind that two somewhat opposed ends have to be gained; the first + and more important one being the production of seeds by any means, and the + second, cross-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + The advantages derived from cross-fertilisation throw a flood of light on + most of the chief characters of flowers. We can thus understand their + large size and bright colours, and in some cases the bright tints of the + adjoining parts, such as the peduncles, bracteae, etc. By this means they + are rendered conspicuous to insects, on the same principle that almost + every fruit which is devoured by birds presents a strong contrast in + colour with the green foliage, in order that it may be seen, and its seeds + freely disseminated. With some flowers conspicuousness is gained at the + expense even of the reproductive organs, as with the ray-florets of many + Compositae, the exterior flowers of Hydrangea, and the terminal flowers of + the Feather-hyacinth or Muscari. There is also reason to believe, and this + was the opinion of Sprengel, that flowers differ in colour in accordance + with the kinds of insects which frequent them. + </p> + <p> + Not only do the bright colours of flowers serve to attract insects, but + dark-coloured streaks and marks are often present, which Sprengel long ago + maintained served as guides to the nectary. These marks follow the veins + in the petals, or lie between them. They may occur on only one, or on all + excepting one or more of the upper or lower petals; or they may form a + dark ring round the tubular part of the corolla, or be confined to the + lips of an irregular flower. In the white varieties of many flowers, such + as of Digitalis purpurea, Antirrhinum majus, several species of Dianthus, + Phlox, Myosotis, Rhododendron, Pelargonium, Primula and Petunia, the marks + generally persist, whilst the rest of the corolla has become of a pure + white; but this may be due merely to their colour being more intense and + thus less readily obliterated. Sprengel’s notion of the use of these marks + as guides appeared to me for a long time fanciful; for insects, without + such aid, readily discover and bite holes through the nectary from the + outside. They also discover the minute nectar-secreting glands on the + stipules and leaves of certain plants. Moreover, some few plants, such as + certain poppies, which are not nectariferous, have guiding marks; but we + might perhaps expect that some few plants would retain traces of a former + nectariferous condition. On the other hand, these marks are much more + common on asymmetrical flowers, the entrance into which would be apt to + puzzle insects, than on regular flowers. Sir J. Lubbock has also proved + that bees readily distinguish colours, and that they lose much time if the + position of honey which they have once visited be in the least changed. + (10/2. ‘British Wild Flowers in relation to Insects’ 1875 page 44.) The + following case affords, I think, the best evidence that these marks have + really been developed in correlation with the nectary. The two upper + petals of the common Pelargonium are thus marked near their bases; and I + have repeatedly observed that when the flowers vary so as to become + peloric or regular, they lose their nectaries and at the same time the + dark marks. When the nectary is only partially aborted, only one of the + upper petals loses its mark. Therefore the nectary and these marks clearly + stand in some sort of close relation to one another; and the simplest view + is that they were developed together for a special purpose; the only + conceivable one being that the marks serve as a guide to the nectary. It + is, however, evident from what has been already said, that insects could + discover the nectar without the aid of guiding marks. They are of service + to the plant, only by aiding insects to visit and suck a greater number of + flowers within a given time than would otherwise be possible; and thus + there will be a better chance of fertilisation by pollen brought from a + distinct plant, and this we know is of paramount importance. + </p> + <p> + The odours emitted by flowers attract insects, as I have observed in the + case of plants covered by a muslin net. Nageli affixed artificial flowers + to branches, scenting some with essential oils and leaving others + unscented; and insects were attracted to the former in an unmistakable + manner. (10/3. ‘Enstehung etc. der Naturhist. Art.’ 1865 page 23.) Not a + few flowers are both conspicuous and odoriferous. Of all colours, white is + the prevailing one; and of white flowers a considerably larger proportion + smell sweetly than of any other colour, namely, 14.6 per cent; of red, + only 8.2 per cent are odoriferous. (10/4. The colours and odours of the + flowers of 4200 species have been tabulated by Landgrabe and by Schubler + and Kohler. I have not seen their original works, but a very full abstract + is given in Loudon’s ‘Gardeners’ Magazine’ volume 13 1837 page 367.) The + fact of a larger proportion of white flowers smelling sweetly may depend + in part on those which are fertilised by moths requiring the double aid of + conspicuousness in the dusk and of odour. So great is the economy of + nature, that most flowers which are fertilised by crepuscular or nocturnal + insects emit their odour chiefly or exclusively in the evening. Some + flowers, however, which are highly odoriferous depend solely on this + quality for their fertilisation, such as the night-flowering stock + (Hesperis) and some species of Daphne; and these present the rare case of + flowers which are fertilised by insects being obscurely coloured. + </p> + <p> + The storage of a supply of nectar in a protected place is manifestly + connected with the visits of insects. So is the position which the stamens + and pistils occupy, either permanently or at the proper period through + their own movements; for when mature they invariably stand in the pathway + leading to the nectary. The shape of the nectary and of the adjoining + parts are likewise related to the particular kinds of insects which + habitually visit the flowers; this has been well shown by Hermann Muller + by his comparison of lowland species which are chiefly visited by bees, + with alpine species belonging to the same genera which are visited by + butterflies. (10/5. ‘Nature’ 1874 page 110, 1875 page 190, 1876 pages 210, + 289.) Flowers may also be adapted to certain kinds of insects, by + secreting nectar particularly attractive to them, and unattractive to + other kinds; of which fact Epipactis latifolia offers the most striking + instance known to me, as it is visited exclusively by wasps. Structures + also exist, such as the hairs within the corolla of the fox glove + (Digitalis), which apparently serve to exclude insects that are not well + fitted to bring pollen from one flower to another. (10/6. Belt ‘The + Naturalist in Nicaragua’ 1874 page 132.) I need say nothing here of the + endless contrivances, such as the viscid glands attached to the + pollen-masses of the Orchideae and Asclepiadae, or the viscid or roughened + state of the pollen-grains of many plants, or the irritability of their + stamens which move when touched by insects etc.—as all these + contrivances evidently favour or ensure cross-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + All ordinary flowers are so far open that insects can force an entrance + into them, notwithstanding that some, like the Snapdragon (Antirrhinum), + various Papilionaceous and Fumariaceous flowers, are in appearance closed. + It cannot be maintained that their openness is necessary for fertility, as + cleistogene flowers which are permanently closed yield a full complement + of seeds. Pollen contains much nitrogen and phosphorus—the two most + precious of all the elements for the growth of plants—but in the + case of most open flowers, a large quantity of pollen is consumed by + pollen-devouring insects, and a large quantity is destroyed during + long-continued rain. With many plants this latter evil is guarded against, + as far as is possible, by the anthers opening only during dry weather + (10/7. Mr. Blackley observed that the ripe anthers of rye did not dehisce + whilst kept under a bell-glass in a damp atmosphere, whilst other anthers + exposed to the same temperature in the open air dehisced freely. He also + found much more pollen adhering to the sticky slides, which were attached + to kites and sent high up in the atmosphere, during the first fine and dry + days after wet weather, than at other times: ‘Experimental Researches on + Hay Fever’ 1873 page 127.)—by the position and form of some or all + of the petals,—by the presence of hairs, etc., and as Kerner has + shown in his interesting essay, by the movements of the petals or of the + whole flower during cold and wet weather. (10/8. ‘Die Schutzmittel des + Pollens’ 1873.) In order to compensate the loss of pollen in so many ways, + the anthers produce a far larger amount than is necessary for the + fertilisation of the same flower. I know this from my own experiments on + Ipomoea, given in the Introduction; and it is still more plainly shown by + the astonishingly small quantity produced by cleistogene flowers, which + lose none of their pollen, in comparison with that produced by the open + flowers borne by the same plants; and yet this small quantity suffices for + the fertilisation of all their numerous seeds. Mr. Hassall took pains in + estimating the number of pollen-grains produced by a flower of the + Dandelion (Leontodon), and found the number to be 243,600, and in a Paeony + 3,654,000 grains. (10/9. ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ volume 8 + 1842 page 108.) The editor of the ‘Botanical Register’ counted the ovules + in the flowers of Wistaria sinensis, and carefully estimated the number of + pollen-grains, and he found that for each ovule there were 7000 grains. + (10/10. Quoted in ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1846 page 771.) With Mirabilis, + three or four of the very large pollen-grains are sufficient to fertilise + an ovule; but I do not know how many grains a flower produces. With + Hibiscus, Kolreuter found that sixty grains were necessary to fertilise + all the ovules of a flower, and he calculated that 4863 grains were + produced by a single flower, or eighty-one times too many. With Geum + urbanum, however, according to Gartner, the pollen is only ten times too + much. (10/11. Kolreuter ‘Vorlaufige Nachricht’ 1761 page 9. Gartner + ‘Beitrage zur Kenntniss’ etc. page 346.) As we thus see that the open + state of all ordinary flowers, and the consequent loss of much pollen, + necessitate the development of so prodigious an excess of this precious + substance, why, it may be asked, are flowers always left open? As many + plants exist throughout the vegetable kingdom which bear cleistogene + flowers, there can hardly be a doubt that all open flowers might easily + have been converted into closed ones. The graduated steps by which this + process could have been effected may be seen at the present time in + Lathyrus nissolia, Biophytum sensitivum, and several other plants. The + answer to the above question obviously is, that with permanently closed + flowers there could be no cross-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + The frequency, almost regularity, with which pollen is transported by + insects from flower to flower, often from a considerable distance, well + deserves attention. (10/12. An experiment made by Kolreuter ‘Forsetsung’ + etc. 1763 page 69, affords good evidence on this head. Hibiscus vesicarius + is strongly dichogamous, its pollen being shed before the stigmas are + mature. Kolreuter marked 310 flowers, and put pollen from other flowers on + their stigmas every day, so that they were thoroughly fertilised; and he + left the same number of other flowers to the agency of insects. Afterwards + he counted the seeds of both lots: the flowers which he had fertilised + with such astonishing care produced 11,237 seeds, whilst those left to the + insects produced 10,886; that is, a less number by only 351; and this + small inferiority is fully accounted for by the insects not having worked + during some days, when the weather was cold with continued rain.) This is + best shown by the impossibility in many cases of raising two varieties of + the same species pure, if they grow at all near together; but to this + subject I shall presently return; also by the many cases of hybrids which + have appeared spontaneously both in gardens and a state of nature. With + respect to the distance from which pollen is often brought, no one who has + had any experience would expect to obtain pure cabbage-seed, for instance, + if a plant of another variety grew within two or three hundred yards. An + accurate observer, the late Mr. Masters of Canterbury, assured me that he + once had his whole stock of seeds “seriously affected with purple + bastards,” by some plants of purple kale which flowered in a cottager’s + garden at the distance of half a mile; no other plant of this variety + growing any nearer. (10/13. Mr. W.C. Marshall caught no less than seven + specimens of a moth (Cucullia umbratica) with the pollinia of the + butterfly-orchis (Habenaria chlorantha) sticking to their eyes, and, + therefore, in the proper position for fertilising the flowers of this + species, on an island in Derwentwater, at the distance of half a mile from + any place where this plant grew: ‘Nature’ 1872 page 393.) But the most + striking case which has been recorded is that by M. Godron, who shows by + the nature of the hybrids produced that Primula grandiflora must have been + crossed with pollen brought by bees from P. officinalis, growing at the + distance of above two kilometres, or of about one English mile and a + quarter. (10/14. ‘Revue des Sc. Nat.’ 1875 page 331.) + </p> + <p> + All those who have long attended to hybridisation, insist in the strongest + terms on the liability of castrated flowers to be fertilised by pollen + brought from distant plants of the same species. (10/15. See, for + instance, the remarks by Herbert ‘Amaryllidaceae’ 1837 page 349. Also + Gartner’s strong expressions on this subject in his ‘Bastarderzeugung’ + 1849 page 670 and ‘Kenntniss der Befruchtung’ 1844 pages 510, 573. Also + Lecoq ‘De la Fecondation’ etc. 1845 page 27. Some statements have been + published during late years of the extraordinary tendency of hybrid plants + to revert to their parent forms; but as it is not said how the flowers + were protected from insects, it may be suspected that they were often + fertilised with pollen brought from a distance from the parent-species.) + The following case shows this in the clearest manner: Gartner, before he + had gained much experience, castrated and fertilised 520 flowers on + various species with pollen of other genera or other species, but left + them unprotected; for, as he says, he thought it a laughable idea that + pollen should be brought from flowers of the same species, none of which + grew nearer than between 500 and 600 yards. (10/16. ‘Kenntniss der + Befruchtung’ pages 539, 550, 575, 576.) The result was that 289 of these + 520 flowers yielded no seed, or none that germinated; the seed of 29 + flowers produced hybrids, such as might have been expected from the nature + of the pollen employed; and lastly, the seed of the remaining 202 flowers + produced perfectly pure plants, so that these flowers must have been + fertilised by pollen brought by insects from a distance of between 500 and + 600 yards. (10/17. Henschel’s experiments quoted by Gartner ‘Kenntniss’ + etc. page 574, which are worthless in all other respects, likewise show + how largely flowers are intercrossed by insects. He castrated many flowers + on thirty-seven species, belonging to twenty-two genera, and put on their + stigmas either no pollen, or pollen from distinct genera, yet they all + seeded, and all the seedlings raised from them were of course pure.) It is + of course possible that some of these 202 flowers might have been + fertilised by pollen left accidentally in them when they were castrated; + but to show how improbable this is, I may add that Gartner, during the + next eighteen years, castrated no less than 8042 flowers and hybridised + them in a closed room; and the seeds from only seventy of these, that is + considerably less than 1 per cent, produced pure or unhybridised + offspring. (10/18. ‘Kenntniss’ etc. pages 555, 576.) + </p> + <p> + From the various facts now given, it is evident that most flowers are + adapted in an admirable manner for cross-fertilisation. Nevertheless, the + greater number likewise present structures which are manifestly adapted, + though not in so striking a manner, for self-fertilisation. The chief of + these is their hermaphrodite condition; that is, their including within + the same corolla both the male and female reproductive organs. These often + stand close together and are mature at the same time; so that pollen from + the same flower cannot fail to be deposited at the proper period on the + stigma. There are also various details of structure adapted for + self-fertilisation. (10/19. Hermann Muller ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. page + 448.) Such structures are best shown in those curious cases discovered by + Hermann Muller, in which a species exists under two forms,—one + bearing conspicuous flowers fitted for cross-fertilisation, and the other + smaller flowers fitted for self-fertilisation, with many parts in the + latter slightly modified for this special purpose. (10/20. ‘Nature’ 1873 + pages 44, 433.) + </p> + <p> + As two objects in most respects opposed, namely, cross-fertilisation and + self-fertilisation, have in many cases to be gained, we can understand the + co-existence in so many flowers of structures which appear at first sight + unnecessarily complex and of an opposed nature. We can thus understand the + great contrast in structure between cleistogene flowers, which are adapted + exclusively for self-fertilisation, and ordinary flowers on the same + plant, which are adapted so as to allow of at least occasional + cross-fertilisation. (10/21. Fritz Muller has discovered in the animal + kingdom ‘Jenaische Zeitschr.’ B. 4 page 451, a case curiously analogous to + that of the plants which bear cleistogene and perfect flowers. He finds in + the nests of termites in Brazil, males and females with imperfect wings, + which do not leave the nests and propagate the species in a cleistogene + manner, but only if a fully-developed queen after swarming does not enter + the old nest. The fully-developed males and females are winged, and + individuals from distinct nests can hardly fail often to intercross. In + the act of swarming they are destroyed in almost infinite numbers by a + host of enemies, so that a queen may often fail to enter an old nest; and + then the imperfectly developed males and females propagate and keep up the + stock.) The former are always minute, completely closed, with their petals + more or less rudimentary and never brightly coloured; they never secrete + nectar, never are odoriferous, have very small anthers which produce only + a few grains of pollen, and their stigmas are but little developed. + Bearing in mind that some flowers are cross-fertilised by the wind (called + anemophilous by Delpino), and others by insects (called entomophilous), we + can further understand, as was pointed out by me several years ago, the + great contrast in appearance between these two classes of flowers. (10/22. + ‘Journal of the Linnean Society’ volume 7 Botany 1863 page 77.) + Anemophilous flowers resemble in many respects cleistogene flowers, but + differ widely in not being closed, in producing an extraordinary amount of + pollen which is always incoherent, and in the stigma often being largely + developed or plumose. We certainly owe the beauty and odour of our flowers + and the storage of a large supply of honey to the existence of insects. + </p> + <p> + ON THE RELATION BETWEEN THE STRUCTURE AND CONSPICUOUSNESS OF FLOWERS, THE + VISITS OF INSECTS, AND THE ADVANTAGES OF CROSS-FERTILISATION. + </p> + <p> + It has already been shown that there is no close relation between the + number of seeds produced by flowers when crossed and self-fertilised, and + the degree to which their offspring are aaffected by the two processes. I + have also given reasons for believing that the inefficiency of a plant’s + own pollen is in most cases an incidental result, or has not been + specially acquired for the sake of preventing self-fertilisation. On the + other hand, there can hardly be a doubt that dichogamy, which prevails + according to Hildebrand in the greater number of species (10/23. ‘Die + Geschlecter Vertheiling’ etc. page 32.),—that the heterostyled + condition of certain plants,—and that many mechanical structures—have + all been acquired so as both to check self-fertilisation and to favour + cross-fertilisation. The means for favouring cross-fertilisation must have + been acquired before those which prevent self-fertilisation; as it would + manifestly be injurious to a plant that its stigma should fail to receive + its own pollen, unless it had already become well adapted for receiving + pollen from another individual. It should be observed that many plants + still possess a high power of self-fertilisation, although their flowers + are excellently constructed for cross-fertilisation—for instance, + those of many papilionaceous species. + </p> + <p> + It may be admitted as almost certain that some structures, such as a + narrow elongated nectary, or a long tubular corolla, have been developed + in order that certain kinds of insects alone should obtain the nectar. + These insects would thus find a store of nectar preserved from the attacks + of other insects; and they would thus be led to visit frequently such + flowers and to carry pollen from one to the other. (10/24. See the + interesting discussion on this subject by Hermann Muller, ‘Die + Befruchtung’ etc. page 431.) It might perhaps have been expected that + plants having their flowers thus peculiarly constructed would profit in a + greater degree by being crossed, than ordinary or simple flowers; but this + does not seem to hold good. Thus Tropaeolum minus has a long nectary and + an irregular corolla, whilst Limnanthes douglasii has a regular flower and + no proper nectary, yet the crossed seedlings of both species are to the + self-fertilised in height as 100 to 79. Salvia coccinea has an irregular + corolla, with a curious apparatus by which insects depress the stamens, + while the flowers of Ipomoea are regular; and the crossed seedlings of the + former are in height to the self-fertilised as 100 to 76, whilst those of + the Ipomoea are as 100 to 77. Fagopyrum is dimorphic, and Anagallis + collina is non-dimorphic, and the crossed seedlings of both are in height + to the self-fertilised as 100 to 69. + </p> + <p> + With all European plants, excepting the comparatively rare anemophilous + kinds, the possibility of distinct individuals intercrossing depends on + the visits of insects; and Hermann Muller has proved by his valuable + observations, that large conspicuous flowers are visited much more + frequently and by many more kinds of insects, than are small inconspicuous + flowers. He further remarks that the flowers which are rarely visited must + be capable of self-fertilisation, otherwise they would quickly become + extinct. (10/25. ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. page 426. ‘Nature’ 1873 page 433.) + There is, however, some liability to error in forming a judgment on this + head, from the extreme difficulty of ascertaining whether flowers which + are rarely or never visited during the day (as in the above given case of + Fumaria capreolata) are not visited by small nocturnal Lepidoptera, which + are known to be strongly attracted by sugar. (10/26. In answer to a + question by me, the editor of an entomological journal writes—“The + Depressariae, as is notorious to every collector of Noctuae, come very + freely to sugar, and no doubt naturally visit flowers:” the + ‘Entomologists’ Weekly Intelligencer’ 1860 page 103.) The two lists given + in the early part of this chapter support Muller’s conclusion that small + and inconspicuous flowers are completely self-fertile: for only eight or + nine out of the 125 species in the two lists come under this head, and all + of these were proved to be highly fertile when insects were excluded. The + singularly inconspicuous flowers of the Fly Ophrys (O. muscifera), as I + have elsewhere shown, are rarely visited by insects; and it is a strange + instance of imperfection, in contradiction to the above rule, that these + flowers are not self-fertile, so that a large proportion of them do not + produce seeds. The converse of the rule that plants bearing small and + inconspicuous flowers are self-fertile, namely, that plants with large and + conspicuous flowers are self-sterile, is far from true, as may be seen in + our second list of spontaneously self-fertile species; for this list + includes such species as Ipomoea purpurea, Adonis aestivalis, Verbascum + thapsus, Pisum sativum, Lathyrus odoratus, some species of Papaver and of + Nymphaea, and others. + </p> + <p> + The rarity of the visits of insects to small flowers, does not depend + altogether on their inconspicuousness, but likewise on the absence of some + sufficient attraction; for the flowers of Trifolium arvense are extremely + small, yet are incessantly visited by hive and humble-bees, as are the + small and dingy flowers of the asparagus. The flowers of Linaria + cymbalaria are small and not very conspicuous, yet at the proper time they + are freely visited by hive-bees. I may add that, according to Mr. Bennett, + there is another and quite distinct class of plants which cannot be much + frequented by insects, as they flower either exclusively or often during + the winter, and these seem adapted for self-fertilisation, as they shed + their pollen before the flowers expand. (10/27. ‘Nature’ 1869 page 11.) + </p> + <p> + That many flowers have been rendered conspicuous for the sake of guiding + insects to them is highly probable or almost certain; but it may be asked, + have other flowers been rendered inconspicuous so that they may not be + frequently visited, or have they merely retained a former and primitive + condition? If a plant were much reduced in size, so probably would be the + flowers through correlated growth, and this may possibly account for some + cases; but the size and colour of the corolla are both extremely variable + characters, and it can hardly be doubted that if large and + brightly-coloured flowers were advantageous to any species, these could be + acquired through natural selection within a moderate lapse of time, as + indeed we see with most alpine plants. Papilionaceous flowers are + manifestly constructed in relation to the visits of insects, and it seems + improbable, from the usual character of the group, that the progenitors of + the genera Vicia and Trifolium produced such minute and unattractive + flowers as those of V. hirsuta and T. procumbens. We are thus led to infer + that some plants either have not had their flowers increased in size, or + have actually had them reduced and purposely rendered inconspicuous, so + that they are now but little visited by insects. In either case they must + also have acquired or retained a high degree of self-fertility. + </p> + <p> + If it became from any cause advantageous to a species to have its capacity + for self-fertilisation increased, there is little difficulty in believing + that this could readily be effected; for three cases of plants varying in + such a manner as to be more fertile with their own pollen than they + originally were, occurred in the course of my few experiments, namely, + with Mimulus, Ipomoea, and Nicotiana. Nor is there any reason to doubt + that many kinds of plants are capable under favourable circumstances of + propagating themselves for very many generations by self-fertilisation. + This is the case with the varieties of Pisum sativum and of Lathyrus + odoratus which are cultivated in England, and with Ophrys apifera and some + other plants in a state of nature. Nevertheless, most or all of these + plants retain structures in an efficient state which cannot be of the + least use excepting for cross-fertilisation. We have also seen reason to + suspect that self-fertilisation is in some peculiar manner beneficial to + certain plants; but if this be really the case, the benefit thus derived + is far more than counter-balanced by a cross with a fresh stock or with a + slightly different variety. + </p> + <p> + Notwithstanding the several considerations just advanced, it seems to me + highly improbable that plants bearing small and inconspicuous flowers have + been or should continue to be subjected to self-fertilisation for a long + series of generations. I think so, not from the evil which manifestly + follows from self-fertilisation, in many cases even in the first + generation, as with Viola tricolor, Sarothamnus, Nemophila, Cyclamen, + etc.; nor from the probability of the evil increasing after several + generations, for on this latter head I have not sufficient evidence, owing + to the manner in which my experiments were conducted. But if plants + bearing small and inconspicuous flowers were not occasionally + intercrossed, and did not profit by the process, all their flowers would + probably have been rendered cleistogene, as they would thus have largely + benefited by having to produce only a small quantity of safely-protected + pollen. In coming to this conclusion, I have been guided by the frequency + with which plants belonging to distinct orders have been rendered + cleistogene. But I can hear of no instance of a species with all its + flowers rendered permanently cleistogene. Leersia makes the nearest + approach to this state; but as already stated, it has been known to + produce perfect flowers in one part of Germany. Some other plants of the + cleistogene class, for instance Aspicarpa, have failed to produce perfect + flowers during several years in a hothouse; but it does not follow that + they would fail to do so in their native country, any more than with + Vandellia, which with me produced only cleistogene flowers during certain + years. Plants belonging to this class commonly bear both kinds of flowers + every season, and the perfect flowers of Viola canina yield fine capsules, + but only when visited by bees. We have also seen that the seedlings of + Ononis minutissima, raised from the perfect flowers fertilised with pollen + from another plant, were finer than those from self-fertilised flowers; + and this was likewise the case to a certain extent with Vandellia. As + therefore no species which at one time bore small and inconspicuous + flowers has had all its flowers rendered cleistogene, I must believe that + plants now bearing small and inconspicuous flowers profit by their still + remaining open, so as to be occasionally intercrossed by insects. It has + been one of the greatest oversights in my work that I did not + experimentise on such flowers, owing to the difficulty of fertilising + them, and to my not having seen the importance of the subject. (10/28. + Some of the species of Solanum would be good ones for such experiments, + for they are said by Hermann Muller ‘Befruchtung’ page 434, to be + unattractive to insects from not secreting nectar, not producing much + pollen, and not being very conspicuous. Hence probably it is that, + according to Verlot ‘Production des Varieties’ 1865 page 72, the varieties + of “les aubergines et les tomates” (species of Solanum) do not intercross + when they are cultivated near together; but it should be remembered that + these are not endemic species. On the other hand, the flowers of the + common potato (S. tuberosum), though they do not secrete nectar Kurr + ‘Bedeutung der Nektarien’ 1833 page 40, yet cannot be considered as + inconspicuous, and they are sometimes visited by diptera (Muller), and, as + I have seen, by humble-bees. Tinzmann (as quoted in ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ + 1846 page 183, found that some of the varieties did not bear seed when + fertilised with pollen from the same variety, but were fertile with that + from another variety.) + </p> + <p> + It should be remembered that in two of the cases in which highly + self-fertile varieties appeared amongst my experimental plants, namely, + with Mimulus and Nicotiana, such varieties were greatly benefited by a + cross with a fresh stock or with a slightly different variety; and this + likewise was the case with the cultivated varieties of Pisum sativum and + Lathyrus odoratus, which have been long propagated by self-fertilisation. + Therefore until the contrary is distinctly proved, I must believe that as + a general rule small and inconspicuous flowers are occasionally + intercrossed by insects; and that after long-continued self-fertilisation, + if they are crossed with pollen brought from a plant growing under + somewhat different conditions, or descended from one thus growing, their + offspring would profit greatly. It cannot be admitted, under our present + state of knowledge, that self-fertilisation continued during many + successive generations is ever the most beneficial method of reproduction. + </p> + <p> + THE MEANS WHICH FAVOUR OR ENSURE FLOWERS BEING FERTILISED WITH POLLEN FROM + A DISTINCT PLANT. + </p> + <p> + We have seen in four cases that seedlings raised from a cross between + flowers on the same plant, even on plants appearing distinct from having + been propagated by stolons or cuttings, were not superior to seedlings + from self-fertilised flowers; and in a fifth case (Digitalis) superior + only in a slight degree. Therefore we might expect that with plants + growing in a state of nature a cross between the flowers on distinct + individuals, and not merely between the flowers on the same plant, would + generally or often be effected by some means. The fact of bees and of some + Diptera visiting the flowers of the same species as long as they can, + instead of promiscuously visiting various species, favours the + intercrossing of distinct plants. On the other hand, insects usually + search a large number of flowers on the same plant before they fly to + another, and this is opposed to cross-fertilisation. The extraordinary + number of flowers which bees are able to search within a very short space + of time, as will be shown in a future chapter, increases the chance of + cross-fertilisation; as does the fact that they are not able to perceive + without entering a flower whether other bees have exhausted the nectar. + For instance, Hermann Muller found that four-fifths of the flowers of + Lamium album which a humble-bee visited had been already exhausted of + their nectar. (10/29. ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. page 311.) In order that + distinct plants should be intercrossed, it is of course indispensable that + two or more individuals should grow near one another; and this is + generally the case. Thus A. de Candolle remarks that in ascending a + mountain the individuals of the same species do not commonly disappear + near its upper limit quite gradually, but rather abruptly. This fact can + hardly be explained by the nature of the conditions, as these graduate + away in an insensible manner, and it probably depends in large part on + vigorous seedlings being produced only as high up the mountain as many + individuals can subsist together. + </p> + <p> + With respect to dioecious plants, distinct individuals must always + fertilise each other. With monoecious plants, as pollen has to be carried + from flower to flower, there will always be a good chance of its being + carried from plant to plant. Delpino has also observed the curious fact + that certain individuals of the monoecious walnut (Juglans regia) are + proterandrous, and others proterogynous, and these will reciprocally + fertilise each other. (10/30. ‘Ult. Osservazioni’ etc. part 2 fasc 2 page + 337.) So it is with the common nut (Corylus avellana) (10/31. ‘Nature’ + 1875 page 26.), and, what is more surprising, with some few hermaphrodite + plants, as observed by Hermann Muller. (10/32. ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. + pages 285, 339.) These latter plants cannot fail to act on each other like + dimorphic or trimorphic species, in which the union of two individuals is + necessary for full and normal fertility. With ordinary hermaphrodite + species, the expansion of only a few flowers at the same time is one of + the simplest means for favouring the intercrossing of distinct + individuals; but this would render the plants less conspicuous to insects, + unless the flowers were of large size, as in the case of several bulbous + plants. Kerner thinks that it is for this object that the Australian + Villarsia parnassifolia produces daily only a single flower. (10/33. ‘Die + Schutzmittel’ etc page 23.) Mr. Cheeseman also remarks, that as certain + Orchids in New Zealand which require insect-aid for their fertilisation + bear only a single flower, distinct plants cannot fail to intercross. + (10/34. ‘Transactions of the New Zealand Institute’ volume 5 1873 page + 356.) + </p> + <p> + Dichogamy, which prevails so extensively throughout the vegetable kingdom, + much increases the chance of distinct individuals intercrossing. With + proterandrous species, which are far more ccommon than proterogynous, the + young flowers are exclusively male in function, and the older ones + exclusively female; and as bees habitually alight low down on the spikes + of flowers in order to crawl upwards, they get dusted with pollen from the + uppermost flowers, which they carry to the stigmas of the lower and older + flowers on the next spike which they visit. The degree to which distinct + plants will thus be intercrossed depends on the number of spikes in full + flower at the same time on the same plant. With proterogynous flowers and + with depending racemes, the manner in which insects visit the flowers + ought to be reversed in order that distinct plants should be intercrossed. + But this whole subject requires further investigation, as the great + importance of crosses between distinct individuals, instead of merely + between distinct flowers, has hitherto been hardly recognised. + </p> + <p> + In some few cases the special movements of certain organs almost ensure + pollen being carried from plant to plant. Thus with many orchids, the + pollen-masses after becoming attached to the head or proboscis of an + insect do not move into the proper position for striking the stigma, until + ample time has elapsed for the insect to fly to another plant. With + Spiranthes autumnalis, the pollen-masses cannot be applied to the stigma + until the labellum and rostellum have moved apart, and this movement is + very slow. (10/35. ‘The Various Contrivances by which British and Foreign + Orchids are fertilised’ first edition page 128.) With Posoqueria fragrans + (one of the Rubiaceae) the same end is gained by the movement of a + specially constructed stamen, as described by Fritz Muller. + </p> + <p> + We now come to a far more general and therefore more important means by + which the mutual fertilisation of distinct plants is effected, namely, the + fertilising power of pollen from another variety or individual being + greater than that of a plant’s own pollen. The simplest and best known + case of prepotent action in pollen, though it does not bear directly on + our present subject, is that of a plant’s own pollen over that from a + distinct species. If pollen from a distinct species be placed on the + stigma of a castrated flower, and then after the interval of several + hours, pollen from the same species be placed on the stigma, the effects + of the former are wholly obliterated, excepting in some rare cases. If two + varieties are treated in the same manner, the result is analogous, though + of directly opposite nature; for pollen from any other variety is often or + generally prepotent over that from the same flower. I will give some + instances: the pollen of Mimulus luteus regularly falls on the stigma of + its own flower, for the plant is highly fertile when insects are excluded. + Now several flowers on a remarkably constant whitish variety were + fertilised without being castrated with pollen from a yellowish variety; + and of the twenty-eight seedlings thus raised, every one bore yellowish + flowers, so that the pollen of the yellow variety completely overwhelmed + that of the mother-plant. Again, Iberis umbellata is spontaneously + self-fertile, and I saw an abundance of pollen from their own flowers on + the stigmas; nevertheless, of thirty seedlings raised from non-castrated + flowers of a crimson variety crossed with pollen from a pink variety, + twenty-four bore pink flowers, like those of the male or pollen-bearing + parent. + </p> + <p> + In these two cases flowers were fertilised with pollen from a distinct + variety, and this was shown to be prepotent by the character of the + offspring. Nearly similar results often follow when two or more + self-fertile varieties are allowed to grow near one another and are + visited by insects. The common cabbage produces a large number of flowers + on the same stalk, and when insects are excluded these set many capsules, + moderately rich in seeds. I planted a white Kohl-rabi, a purple Kohl-rabi, + a Portsmouth broccoli, a Brussels sprout, and a Sugar-loaf cabbage near + together and left them uncovered. Seeds collected from each kind were sown + in separate beds; and the majority of the seedlings in all five beds were + mongrelised in the most complicated manner, some taking more after one + variety, and some after another. The effects of the Kohl-rabi were + particularly plain in the enlarged stems of many of the seedlings. + Altogether 233 plants were raised, of which 155 were mongrelised in the + plainest manner, and of the remaining 78 not half were absolutely pure. I + repeated the experiment by planting near together two varieties of cabbage + with purple-green and white-green lacinated leaves; and of the 325 + seedlings raised from the purple-green variety, 165 had white-green and + 160 purple-green leaves. Of the 466 seedlings raised from the white-green + variety, 220 had purple-green and 246 white-green leaves. These cases show + how largely pollen from a neighbouring variety of the cabbage effaces the + action of the plant’s own pollen. We should bear in mind that pollen must + be carried by the bees from flower to flower on the same large branching + stem much more abundantly than from plant to plant; and in the case of + plants the flowers of which are in some degree dichogamous, those on the + same stem would be of different ages, and would thus be as ready for + mutual fertilisation as the flowers on distinct plants, were it not for + the prepotency of pollen from another variety. (10/36. A writer in the + ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1855 page 730, says that he planted a bed of + turnips (Brassica rapa) and of rape (B. napus) close together, and sowed + the seeds of the former. The result was that scarcely one seedling was + true to its kind, and several closely resembled rape.) + </p> + <p> + Several varieties of the radish (Raphanus sativus), which is moderately + self-fertile when insects are excluded, were in flower at the same time in + my garden. Seed was collected from one of them, and out of twenty-two + seedlings thus raised only twelve were true to their kind. (10/37. Duhamel + as quoted by Godron ‘De l’Espece’ tome 2 page 50, makes an analogous + statement with respect to this plant.) + </p> + <p> + The onion produces a large number of flowers, all crowded together into a + large globular head, each flower having six stamens; so that the stigmas + receive plenty of pollen from their own and the adjoining anthers. + Consequently the plant is fairly self-fertile when protected from insects. + A blood-red, silver, globe and Spanish onion were planted near together; + and seedlings were raised from each kind in four separate beds. In all the + beds mongrels of various kinds were numerous, except amongst the ten + seedlings from the blood-red onion, which included only two. Altogether + forty-six seedlings were raised, of which thirty-one had been plainly + crossed. + </p> + <p> + A similar result is known to follow with the varieties of many other + plants, if allowed to flower near together: I refer here only to species + which are capable of fertilising themselves, for if this be not the case, + they would of course be liable to be crossed by any other variety growing + near. Horticulturists do not commonly distinguish between the effects of + variability and intercrossing; but I have collected evidence on the + natural crossing of varieties of the tulip, hyacinth, anemone, ranunculus, + strawberry, Leptosiphon androsaceus, orange, rhododendron and rhubarb, all + of which plants I believe to be self-fertile. (10/38. With respect to + tulips and some other flowers, see Godron ‘De l’Espece’ tome 1 page 252. + For anemones ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1859 page 98. For strawberries see + Herbert in ‘Transactions of the Horticultural Society’ volume 4 page 17. + The same observer elsewhere speaks of the spontaneous crossing of + rhododendrons. Gallesio makes the same statement with respect to oranges. + I have myself known extensive crossing to occur with the common rhubarb. + For Leptosiphon, Verlot ‘Des Varieties’ 1865 page 20. I have not included + in my list the Carnation, Nemophila, or Antirrhinum, the varieties of + which are known to cross freely, because these plants are not always + self-fertile. I know nothing about the self-fertility of Trollius Lecoq + ‘De la Fecondation’ 1862 page 93, Mahonia, and Crinum, in which genera the + species intercross largely. With respect to Mahonia it is now scarcely + possible to procure in this country pure specimens of M. aquifolium or + repens; and the various species of Crinum sent by Herbert ‘Amaryllidaceae’ + page 32, to Calcutta, crossed there so freely that pure seed could not be + saved.) Much other indirect evidence could be given with respect to the + extent to which varieties of the same species spontaneously intercross. + </p> + <p> + Gardeners who raise seed for sale are compelled by dearly bought + experience to take extraordinary precautions against intercrossing. Thus + Messrs. Sharp “have land engaged in the growth of seed in no less than + eight parishes.” The mere fact of a vast number of plants belonging to the + same variety growing together is a considerable protection, as the chances + are strong in favour of plants of the same variety intercrossing; and it + is in chief part owing to this circumstance, that certain villages have + become famous for pure seed of particular varieties. (10/39. With respect + to Messrs. Sharp see ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1856 page 823. Lindley’s + ‘Theory of Horticulture’ page 319.) Only two trials were made by me to + ascertain after how long an interval of time, pollen from a distinct + variety would obliterate more or less completely the action of a plant’s + own pollen. The stigmas in two lately expanded flowers on a variety of + cabbage, called Ragged Jack, were well covered with pollen from the same + plant. After an interval of twenty-three hours, pollen from the Early + Barnes Cabbage growing at a distance was placed on both stigmas; and as + the plant was left uncovered, pollen from other flowers on the Ragged Jack + would certainly have been left by the bees during the next two or three + days on the same two stigmas. Under these circumstances it seemed very + unlikely that the pollen of the Barnes cabbage would produce any effect; + but three out of the fifteen plants raised from the two capsules thus + produced were plainly mongrelised: and I have no doubt that the twelve + other plants were affected, for they grew much more vigorously than the + self-fertilised seedlings from the Ragged Jack planted at the same time + and under the same conditions. Secondly, I placed on several stigmas of a + long-styled cowslip (Primula veris) plenty of pollen from the same plant, + and after twenty-four hours added some from a short-styled dark-red + Polyanthus, which is a variety of the cowslip. From the flowers thus + treated thirty seedlings were raised, and all these without exception bore + reddish flowers; so that the effect of the plant’s own pollen, though + placed on the stigmas twenty-four hours previously, was quite destroyed by + that of the red variety. It should, however, be observed that these plants + are dimorphic, and that the second union was a legitimate one, whilst the + first was illegitimate; but flowers illegitimately fertilised with their + own pollen yield a moderately fair supply of seeds. + </p> + <p> + We have hitherto considered only the prepotent fertilising power of pollen + from a distinct variety over a plants’ own pollen,—both kinds of + pollen being placed on the same stigma. It is a much more remarkable fact + that pollen from another individual of the same variety is prepotent over + a plant’s own pollen, as shown by the superiority of the seedlings raised + from a cross of this kind over seedlings from self-fertilised flowers. + Thus in Tables 7/A, B, and C, there are at least fifteen species which are + self-fertile when insects are excluded; and this implies that their + stigmas must receive their own pollen; nevertheless, most of the seedlings + which were raised by fertilising the non-castrated flowers of these + fifteen species with pollen from another plant were greatly superior, in + height, weight, and fertility, to the self-fertilised offspring. (10/40. + These fifteen species consist of Brassica oleracea, Reseda odorata and + lutea, Limnanthes douglasii, Papaver vagum, Viscaria oculata, Beta + vulgaris, Lupinus luteus, Ipomoea purpurea, Mimulus luteus, Calceolaria, + Verbascum thapsus, Vandellia nummularifolia, Lactuca sativa, and Zea + mays.) For instance, with Ipomoea purpurea every single intercrossed plant + exceeded in height its self-fertilised opponent until the sixth + generation; and so it was with Mimulus luteus until the fourth generation. + Out of six pairs of crossed and self-fertilised cabbages, every one of the + former was much heavier than the latter. With Papaver vagum, out of + fifteen pairs, all but two of the crossed plants were taller than their + self-fertilised opponents. Of eight pairs of Lupinus luteus, all but two + of the crossed were taller; of eight pairs of Beta vulgaris all but one; + and of fifteen pairs of Zea mays all but two were taller. Of fifteen pairs + of Limnanthes douglasii, and of seven pairs of Lactuca sativa, every + single crossed plant was taller than its self-fertilised opponent. It + should also be observed that in these experiments no particular care was + taken to cross-fertilise the flowers immediately after their expansion; it + is therefore almost certain that in many of these cases some pollen from + the same flower will have already fallen on and acted on the stigma. + </p> + <p> + There can hardly be a doubt that several other species of which the + crossed seedlings are more vigorous than the self-fertilised, as shown in + Tables 7/A, 7/B and 7/C, besides the above fifteen, must have received + their own pollen and that from another plant at nearly the same time; and + if so, the same remarks as those just given are applicable to them. + Scarcely any result from my experiments has surprised me so much as this + of the prepotency of pollen from a distinct individual over each plant’s + own pollen, as proved by the greater constitutional vigour of the crossed + seedlings. The evidence of prepotency is here deduced from the comparative + growth of the two lots of seedlings; but we have similar evidence in many + cases from the much greater fertility of the non-castrated flowers on the + mother-plant, when these received at the same time their own pollen and + that from a distinct plant, in comparison with the flowers which received + only their own pollen. + </p> + <p> + From the various facts now given on the spontaneous intercrossing of + varieties growing near together, and on the effects of cross-fertilising + flowers which are self-fertile and have not been castrated, we may + conclude that pollen brought by insects or by the wind from a distinct + plant will generally prevent the action of pollen from the same flower, + even though it may have been applied some time before; and thus the + intercrossing of plants in a state of nature will be greatly favoured or + ensured. + </p> + <p> + The case of a great tree covered with innumerable hermaphrodite flowers + seems at first sight strongly opposed to the belief in the frequency of + intercrosses between distinct individuals. The flowers which grow on the + opposite sides of such a tree will have been exposed to somewhat different + conditions, and a cross between them may perhaps be in some degree + beneficial; but it is not probable that it would be nearly so beneficial + as a cross between flowers on distinct trees, as we may infer from the + inefficiency of pollen taken from plants which have been propagated from + the same stock, though growing on separate roots. The number of bees which + frequent certain kinds of trees when in full flower is very great, and + they may be seen flying from tree to tree more frequently than might have + been expected. Nevertheless, if we consider how numerous are the flowers, + for instance, on a horse-chestnut or lime-tree, an incomparably larger + number of flowers must be fertilised by pollen brought from other flowers + on the same tree, than from flowers on a distinct tree. But we should bear + in mind that with the horse-chestnut, for instance, only one or two of the + several flowers on the same peduncle produce a seed; and that this seed is + the product of only one out of several ovules within the same ovarium. Now + we know from the experiments of Herbert and others that if one flower is + fertilised with pollen which is more efficient than that applied to the + other flowers on the same peduncle, the latter often drop off (10/41. + ‘Variation under Domestication’ chapter 17 2nd edition volume 2 page + 120.); and it is probable that this would occur with many of the + self-fertilised flowers on a large tree, if other and adjoining flowers + were cross-fertilised. Of the flowers annually produced by a great tree, + it is almost certain that a large number would be self-fertilised; and if + we assume that the tree produced only 500 flowers, and that this number of + seeds were requisite to keep up the stock, so that at least one seedling + should hereafter struggle to maturity, then a large proportion of the + seedlings would necessarily be derived from self-fertilised seeds. But if + the tree annually produced 50,000 flowers, of which the self-fertilised + dropped off without yielding seeds, then the cross-fertilised flowers + might yield seeds in sufficient number to keep up the stock, and most of + the seedlings would be vigorous from being the product of a cross between + distinct individuals. In this manner the production of a vast number of + flowers, besides serving to entice numerous insects and to compensate for + the accidental destruction of many flowers by spring-frosts or otherwise, + would be a very great advantage to the species; and when we behold our + orchard-trees covered with a white sheet of bloom in the spring, we should + not falsely accuse nature of wasteful expenditure, though comparatively + little fruit is produced in the autumn. + </p> + <h3> + ANEMOPHILOUS PLANTS. + </h3> + <p> + The nature and relations of plants which are fertilised by the wind have + been admirably discussed by Delpino and Hermann Muller; and I have already + made some remarks on the structure of their flowers in contrast with those + of entomophilous species. (10/42. Delpino ‘Ult. Osservazioni sulla + Dicogamia’ part 2 fasc. 1 1870 and ‘Studi sopra un Lignaggio anemofilo’ + etc. 1871. Hermann Muller ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. pages 412, 442. Both + these authors remark that plants must have been anemophilous before they + were entomophilous. Hermann Muller further discusses in a very interesting + manner the steps by which entomophilous flowers became nectariferous and + gradually acquired their present structure through successive beneficial + changes.) There is good reason to believe that the first plants which + appeared on this earth were cryptogamic; and judging from what now occurs, + the male fertilising element must either have possessed the power of + spontaneous movement through the water or over damp surfaces, or have been + carried by currents of water to the female organs. That some of the most + ancient plants, such as ferns, possessed true sexual organs there can + hardly be a doubt; and this shows, as Hildebrand remarks, at how early a + period the sexes were separated. (10/43. ‘Die Geschlechter-Vertheilung’ + 1867 pages 84-90.) As soon as plants became phanerogamic and grew on the + dry ground, if they were ever to intercross, it would be indispensable + that the male fertilising element should be transported by some means + through the air; and the wind is the simplest means of transport. There + must also have been a period when winged insects did not exist, and plants + would not then have been rendered entomophilous. Even at a somewhat later + period the more specialised orders of the Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and + Diptera, which are now chiefly concerned with the transport of pollen, did + not exist. Therefore the earliest terrestrial plants known to us, namely, + the Coniferae and Cycadiae, no doubt were anemophilous, like the existing + species of these same groups. A vestige of this early state of things is + likewise shown by some other groups of plants which are anemophilous, as + these on the whole stand lower in the scale than entomophilous species. + </p> + <p> + There is no great difficulty in understanding how an anemophilous plant + might have been rendered entomophilous. Pollen is a nutritious substance, + and would soon have been discovered and devoured by insects; and if any + adhered to their bodies it would have been carried from the anthers to the + stigma of the same flower, or from one flower to another. One of the chief + characteristics of the pollen of anemophilous plants is its incoherence; + but pollen in this state can adhere to the hairy bodies of insects, as we + see with some Leguminosae, Ericaceae, and Melastomaceae. We have, however, + better evidence of the possibility of a transition of the above kind in + certain plants being now fertilised partly by the wind and partly by + insects. The common rhubarb (Rheum rhaponticum) is so far in an + intermediate condition, that I have seen many Diptera sucking the flowers, + with much pollen adhering to their bodies; and yet the pollen is so + incoherent, that clouds of it are emitted if the plant be gently shaken on + a sunny day, some of which could hardly fail to fall on the large stigmas + of the neighbouring flowers. According to Delpino and Hermann Muller, some + species of Plantago are in a similar intermediate condition. (10/44. ‘Die + Befruchtung’ etc. page 342.) + </p> + <p> + Although it is probable that pollen was aboriginally the sole attraction + to insects, and although many plants now exist whose flowers are + frequented exclusively by pollen-devouring insects, yet the great majority + secrete nectar as the chief attraction. Many years ago I suggested that + primarily the saccharine matter in nectar was excreted as a waste product + of chemical changes in the sap; and that when the excretion happened to + occur within the envelopes of a flower, it was utilised for the important + object of cross-fertilisation, being subsequently much increased in + quantity and stored in various ways. (10/45. Nectar was regarded by De + Candolle and Dunal as an excretion, as stated by Martinet in ‘Annal des + Sc. Nat.’ 1872 tome 14 page 211.) This view is rendered probable by the + leaves of some trees excreting, under certain climatic conditions, without + the aid of special glands, a saccharine fluid, often called honey-dew. + This is the case with the leaves of the lime; for although some authors + have disputed the fact, a most capable judge, Dr. Maxwell Masters, informs + me that, after having heard the discussions on this subject before the + Horticultural Society, he feels no doubt on this head. The leaves, as well + as the cut stems, of the manna ash (Fraxinus ornus) secrete in a like + manner saccharine matter. (10/46. ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1876 page 242.) + According to Treviranus, so do the upper surfaces of the leaves of Carduus + arctioides during hot weather. Many analogous facts could be given. + (10/47. Kurr ‘Untersuchungen uber die Bedeutung der Nektarien’ 1833 page + 115.) There are, however, a considerable number of plants which bear small + glands on their leaves, petioles, phyllodia, stipules, bracteae, or flower + peduncles, or on the outside of their calyx, and these glands secrete + minute drops of a sweet fluid, which is eagerly sought by sugar-loving + insects, such as ants, hive-bees, and wasps. (10/48. A large number of + cases are given by Delpino in the ‘Bulletino Entomologico’ Anno 6 1874. To + these may be added those given in my text, as well as the excretion of + saccharine matter from the calyx of two species of Iris, and from the + bracteae of certain Orchideae: see Kurr ‘Bedeutung der Nektarien’ 1833 + pages 25, 28. Belt ‘Nicaragua’ page 224, also refers to a similar + excretion by many epiphytal orchids and passion-flowers. Mr. Rodgers has + seen much nectar secreted from the bases of the flower-peduncles of + Vanilla. Link says that the only example of a hypopetalous nectary known + to him is externally at the base of the flowers of Chironia decussata: see + ‘Reports on Botany, Ray Society’ 1846 page 355. An important memoir + bearing on this subject has lately appeared by Reinke ‘Gottingen + Nachrichten’ 1873 page 825, who shows that in many plants the tips of the + serrations on the leaves in the bud bear glands which secrete only at a + very early age, and which have the same morphological structure as true + nectar-secreting glands. He further shows that the nectar-secreting glands + on the petioles of Prunus avium are not developed at a very early age, yet + wither away on the old leaves. They are homologous with those on the + serrations of the blades of the same leaves, as shown by their structure + and by transition-forms; for the lowest serrations on the blades of most + of the leaves secrete nectar instead of resin (harz).) In the case of the + glands on the stipules of Vicia sativa, the excretion manifestly depends + on changes in the sap, consequent on the sun shining brightly; for I + repeatedly observed that as soon as the sun was hidden behind clouds the + secretion ceased, and the hive-bees left the field; but as soon as the sun + broke out again, they returned to their feast. (10/49. I published a brief + notice of this case in the ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1855 July 21 page 487, + and afterwards made further observations. Besides the hive-bee, another + species of bee, a moth, ants, and two kinds of flies sucked the drops of + fluid on the stipules. The larger drops tasted sweet. The hive-bees never + even looked at the flowers which were open at the same time; whilst two + species of humble-bees neglected the stipules and visited only the + flowers.) I have observed an analogous fact with the secretion of true + nectar in the flowers of Lobelia erinus. + </p> + <p> + Delpino, however, maintains that the power of secreting a sweet fluid by + any extra-floral organ has been in every case specially gained, for the + sake of attracting ants and wasps as defenders of the plant against their + enemies; but I have never seen any reason to believe that this is so with + the three species observed by me, namely, Prunus laurocerasus, Vicia + sativa, and V. faba. No plant is so little attacked by enemies of any kind + as the common bracken-fern (Pteris aquilina); and yet, as my son Francis + has discovered, the large glands at the bases of the fronds, but only + whilst young, excrete much sweetish fluid, which is eagerly sought by + innumerable ants, chiefly belonging to Myrmica; and these ants certainly + do not serve as a protection against any enemy. Delpino argues that such + glands ought not to be considered as excretory, because if they were so, + they would be present in every species; but I cannot see much force in + this argument, as the leaves of some plants excrete sugar only during + certain states of the weather. That in some cases the secretion serves to + attract insects as defenders of the plant, and may have been developed to + a high degree for this special purpose, I have not the least doubt, from + the observations of Delpino, and more especially from those of Mr. Belt on + Acacia sphaerocephala, and on passion-flowers. This acacia likewise + produces, as an additional attraction to ants, small bodies containing + much oil and protoplasm, and analogous bodies are developed by a Cecropia + for the same purpose, as described by Fritz Muller. (10/50. Mr. Belt ‘The + Naturalist in Nicaragua’ 1874 page 218, has given a most interesting + account of the paramount importance of ants as defenders of the above + Acacia. With respect to the Cecropia see ‘Nature’ 1876 page 304. My son + Francis has described the microscopical structure and development of these + wonderful food-bodies in a paper read before the Linnean Society.) + </p> + <p> + The excretion of a sweet fluid by glands seated outside of a flower is + rarely utilised as a means for cross-fertilisation by the aid of insects; + but this occurs with the bracteae of the Marcgraviaceae, as the late Dr. + Cruger informed me from actual observation in the West Indies, and as + Delpino infers with much acuteness from the relative position of the + several parts of their flowers. (10/51. ‘Ult. Osservaz. Dicogamia’ 1868-69 + page 188.) Mr. Farrer has also shown that the flowers of Coronilla are + curiously modified, so that bees may fertilise them whilst sucking the + fluid secreted from the outside of the calyx. (10/52. ‘Nature’ 1874 page + 169.) It further appears probable from the observations of the Reverend + W.A. Leighton, that the fluid so abundantly secreted by glands on the + phyllodia of the Australian Acacia magnifica, which stand near the + flowers, is connected with their fertilisation. (10/53. ‘Annals and + Magazine of Natural History’ volume 16 1865 page 14. In my work on the + ‘Fertilisation of Orchids’ and in a paper subsequently published in the + ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ it has been shown that although + certain kinds of orchids possess a nectary, no nectar is actually secreted + by it; but that insects penetrate the inner walls and suck the fluid + contained in the intercellular spaces. I further suggested, in the case of + some other orchids which do not secrete nectar, that insects gnawed the + labellum; and this suggestion has since been proved true. Hermann Muller + and Delpino have now shown that some other plants have thickened petals + which are sucked or gnawed by insects, their fertilisation being thus + aided. All the known facts on this head have been collected by Delpino in + his ‘Ult. Osserv.’ part 2 fasc. 2 1875 pages 59-63.) + </p> + <p> + The amount of pollen produced by anemophilous plants, and the distance to + which it is often transported by the wind, are both surprisingly great. + Mr. Hassall found that the weight of pollen produced by a single plant of + the Bulrush (Typha) was 144 grains. Bucketfuls of pollen, chiefly of + Coniferae and Gramineae, have been swept off the decks of vessels near the + North American shore; and Mr. Riley has seen the ground near St. Louis, in + Missouri, covered with pollen, as if sprinkled with sulphur; and there was + good reason to believe that this had been transported from the + pine-forests at least 400 miles to the south. Kerner has seen the + snow-fields on the higher Alps similarly dusted; and Mr. Blackley found + numerous pollen-grains, in one instance 1200, adhering to sticky slides, + which were sent up to a height of from 500 to 1000 feet by means of a + kite, and then uncovered by a special mechanism. It is remarkable that in + these experiments there were on an average nineteen times as many + pollen-grains in the atmosphere at the higher than at the lower levels. + (10/54. For Mr. Hassall’s observations see ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural + History’ volume 8 1842 page 108. In the ‘North American Journal of + Science’ January 1842, there is an account of the pollen swept off the + decks of a vessel. Riley ‘Fifth Report on the Noxious Insects of Missouri’ + 1873 page 86. Kerner ‘Die Schutzmittel des Pollens’ 1873 page 6. This + author has also seen a lake in the Tyrol so covered with pollen, that the + water no longer appeared blue. Mr. Blackley ‘Experimental Researches on + Hay-fever’ 1873 pages 132, 141-152.) Considering these facts, it is not so + surprising as it at first appears that all, or nearly all, the stigmas of + anemophilous plants should receive pollen brought to them by mere chance + by the wind. During the early part of summer every object is thus dusted + with pollen; for instance, I examined for another purpose the labella of a + large number of flowers of the Fly Ophrys (which is rarely visited by + insects), and found on all very many pollen-grains of other plants, which + had been caught by their velvety surfaces. + </p> + <p> + The extraordinary quantity and lightness of the pollen of anemophilous + plants are no doubt both necessary, as their pollen has generally to be + carried to the stigmas of other and often distant flowers; for, as we + shall soon see, most anemophilous plants have their sexes separated. The + fertilisation of these plants is generally aided by the stigmas being of + large size or plumose; and in the case of the Coniferae, by the naked + ovules secreting a drop of fluid, as shown by Delpino. Although the number + of anemophilous species is small, as the author just quoted remarks, the + number of individuals is large in comparison with that of entomophilous + species. This holds good especially in cold and temperate regions, where + insects are not so numerous as under a warmer climate, and where + consequently entomophilous plants are less favourably situated. We see + this in our forests of Coniferae and other trees, such as oaks, beeches, + birches, ashes, etc.; and in the Gramineae, Cyperaceae, and Juncaceae, + which clothe our meadows and swamps; all these trees and plants being + fertilised by the wind. As a large quantity of pollen is wasted by + anemophilous plants, it is surprising that so many vigorous species of + this kind abounding with individuals should still exist in any part of the + world; for if they had been rendered entomophilous, their pollen would + have been transported by the aid of the senses and appetites of insects + with incomparably greater safety than by the wind. That such a conversion + is possible can hardly be doubted, from the remarks lately made on the + existence of intermediate forms; and apparently it has been effected in + the group of willows, as we may infer from the nature of their nearest + allies. (10/55. Hermann Muller ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. page 149.) + </p> + <p> + It seems at first sight a still more surprising fact that plants, after + having been once rendered entomophilous, should ever again have become + anemophilous; but this has occasionally though rarely occurred, for + instance, with the common Poterium sanguisorba, as may be inferred from + its belonging to the Rosaceae. Such cases are, however, intelligible, as + almost all plants require to be occasionally intercrossed; and if any + entomiphilous species ceased to be visited by insects, it would probably + perish unless it were rendered anemophilous. A plant would be neglected by + insects if nectar failed to be secreted, unless indeed a large supply of + attractive pollen was present; and from what we have seen of the excretion + of saccharine fluid from leaves and glands being largely governed in + several cases by climatic influences, and from some few flowers which do + not now secrete nectar still retaining coloured guiding-marks, the failure + of the secretion cannot be considered as a very improbable event. The same + result would follow to a certainty, if winged insects ceased to exist in + any district, or became very rare. Now there is only a single plant in the + great order of the Cruciferae, namely, Pringlea, which is anemophilous, + and this plant is an inhabitant of Kerguelen Land, where there are hardly + any winged insects, owing probably, as was suggested by me in the case of + Madeira, to the risk which they run of being blown out to sea and + destroyed. (10/56. The Reverend A.E. Eaton in ‘Proceedings of the Royal + Society’ volume 23 1875 page 351.) + </p> + <p> + A remarkable fact with respect to anemophilous plants is that they are + often diclinous, that is, they are either monoecious with their sexes + separated on the same plant, or dioecious with their sexes on distinct + plants. In the class Monoecia of Linnaeus, Delpino shows that the species + of twenty-eight genera are anemophilous, and of seventeen genera + entomophilous. (10/57. ‘Studi sopra un Lignaggio anemofilo delle + Compositae’ 1871.) The larger proportion of entomophilous genera in this + latter class is probably the indirect result of insects having the power + of carrying pollen to another and sometimes distant plant much more + securely than the wind. In the above two classes taken together there are + thirty-eight anemophilous and thirty-six entomophilous genera; whereas in + the great mass of hermaphrodite plants the proportion of anemophilous to + entomophilous genera is extremely small. The cause of this remarkable + difference may be attributed to anemophilous plants having retained in a + greater degree than the entomophilous a primordial condition, in which the + sexes were separated and their mutual fertilisation effected by means of + the wind. That the earliest and lowest members of the vegetable kingdom + had their sexes separated, as is still the case to a large extent, is the + opinion of a high authority, Nageli. (10/58. ‘Entstehung und Begriff der + Naturhist. Art’ 1865 page 22.) It is indeed difficult to avoid this + conclusion, if we admit the view, which seems highly probable, that the + conjugation of the Algae and of some of the simplest animals is the first + step towards sexual reproduction; and if we further bear in mind that a + greater and greater degree of differentiation between the cells which + conjugate can be traced, thus leading apparently to the development of the + two sexual forms. (10/59. See the interesting discussion on this whole + subject by O. Butschli in his ‘Studien uber die ersten + Entwickelungsvorgange der Eizelle; etc. 1876 pages 207-219. Also Engelmann + “Ueber Entwickelung von Infusorien” ‘Morphol. Jahrbuch’ B. 1 page 573. + Also Dr. A. Dodel “Die Kraushaar-Algae” ‘Pringsheims Jahrbuch f. Wiss. + Bot.’ B. 10.) We have also seen that as plants became more highly + developed and affixed to the ground, they would be compelled to be + anemophilous in order to intercross. Therefore all plants which have not + since been greatly modified, would tend still to be both diclinous and + anemophilous; and we can thus understand the connection between these two + states, although they appear at first sight quite disconnected. If this + view is correct, plants must have been rendered hermaphrodites at a later + though still very early period, and entomophilous at a yet later period, + namely, after the development of winged insects. So that the relationship + between hermaphroditism and fertilisation by means of insects is likewise + to a certain extent intelligible. + </p> + <p> + Why the descendants of plants which were originally dioecious, and which + therefore profited by always intercrossing with another individual, should + have been converted into hermaphrodites, may perhaps be explained by the + risk which they ran, especially as long as they were anemophilous, of not + being always fertilised, and consequently of not leaving offspring. This + latter evil, the greatest of all to any organism, would have been much + lessened by their becoming hermaphrodites, though with the contingent + disadvantage of frequent self-fertilisation. By what graduated steps an + hermaphrodite condition was acquired we do not know. But we can see that + if a lowly organised form, in which the two sexes were represented by + somewhat different individuals, were to increase by budding either before + or after conjugation, the two incipient sexes would be capable of + appearing by buds on the same stock, as occasionally occurs with various + characters at the present day. The organism would then be in a monoecious + condition, and this is probably the first step towards hermaphroditism; + for if very simple male and female flowers on the same stock, each + consisting of a single stamen or pistil, were brought close together and + surrounded by a common envelope, in nearly the same manner as with the + florets of the Compositae, we should have an hermaphrodite flower. + </p> + <p> + There seems to be no limit to the changes which organisms undergo under + changing conditions of life; and some hermaphrodite plants, descended as + we must believe from aboriginally diclinous plants, have had their sexes + again separated. That this has occurred, we may infer from the presence of + rudimentary stamens in the flowers of some individuals, and of rudimentary + pistils in the flowers of other individuals, for example in Lychnis + dioica. But a conversion of this kind will not have occurred unless + cross-fertilisation was already assured, generally by the agency of + insects; but why the production of male and female flowers on distinct + plants should have been advantageous to the species, cross-fertilisation + having been previously assured, is far from obvious. A plant might indeed + produce twice as many seeds as were necessary to keep up its numbers under + new or changed conditions of life; and if it did not vary by bearing fewer + flowers, and did vary in the state of its reproductive organs (as often + occurs under cultivation), a wasteful expenditure of seeds and pollen + would be saved by the flowers becoming diclinous. + </p> + <p> + A related point is worth notice. I remarked in my Origin of Species that + in Britain a much larger proportion of trees and bushes than of herbaceous + plants have their sexes separated; and so it is, according to Asa Gray and + Hooker, in North America and New Zealand. (10/60. I find in the ‘London + Catalogue of British Plants’ that there are thirty-two indigenous trees + and bushes in Great Britain, classed under nine families; but to err on + the safe side, I have counted only six species of willows. Of the + thirty-two trees and bushes, nineteen, or more than half, have their sexes + separated; and this is an enormous proportion compared with other British + plants. New Zealand abounds with diclinous plants and trees; and Dr. + Hooker calculates that out of about 756 phanerogamic plants inhabiting the + islands, no less than 108 are trees, belonging to thirty-five families. Of + these 108 trees, fifty-two, or very nearly half, have their sexes more or + less separated. Of bushes there are 149, of which sixty-one have their + sexes in the same state; whilst of the remaining 500 herbaceous plants + only 121, or less than a fourth, have their sexes separated. Lastly, + Professor Asa Gray informs me that in the United States there are 132 + native trees (belonging to twenty-five families) of which ninety-five + (belonging to seventeen families) “have their sexes more or less + separated, for the greater part decidedly separated.”) It is, however, + doubtful how far this rule holds good generally, and it certainly does not + do so in Australia. But I have been assured that the flowers of the + prevailing Australian trees, namely, the Myrtaceae, swarm with insects, + and if they are dichogamous they would be practically diclinous. (10/61. + With respect to the Proteaceae of Australia, Mr. Bentham ‘Journal of the + Linnean Society Botany’ volume 13 1871 pages 58, 64, remarks on the + various contrivances by which the stigma in the several genera is screened + from the action of the pollen from the same flower. For instance, in + Synaphea “the stigma is held by the eunuch (i.e., one of the stamens which + is barren) safe from all pollution from her brother anthers, and is + preserved intact for any pollen that may be inserted by insects and other + agencies.”) As far as anemophilous plants are concerned, we know that they + are apt to have their sexes separated, and we can see that it would be an + unfavourable circumstance for them to bear their flowers very close to the + ground, as their pollen is liable to be blown high up in the air (10/62. + Kerner ‘Schutzmittel des Pollens’ 1873 page 4.); but as the culms of + grasses give sufficient elevation, we cannot thus account for so many + trees and bushes being diclinous. We may infer from our previous + discussion that a tree bearing numerous hermaphrodite flowers would rarely + intercross with another tree, except by means of the pollen of a distinct + individual being prepotent over the plants’ own pollen. Now the separation + of the sexes, whether the plant were anemophilous are entomophilous, would + most effectually bar self-fertilisation, and this may be the cause of so + many trees and bushes being diclinous. Or to put the case in another way, + a plant would be better fitted for development into a tree, if the sexes + were separated, than if it were hermaphrodite; for in the former case its + numerous flowers would be less liable to continued self-fertilisation. But + it should also be observed that the long life of a tree or bush permits of + the separation of the sexes, with much less risk of evil from impregnation + occasionally failing and seeds not being produced, than in the case of + short-lived plants. Hence it probably is, as Lecoq has remarked, that + annual plants are rarely dioecious. + </p> + <p> + Finally, we have seen reason to believe that the higher plants are + descended from extremely low forms which conjugated, and that the + conjugating individuals differed somewhat from one another,—the one + representing the male and the other the female—so that plants were + aboriginally dioecious. At a very early period such lowly organised + dioecious plants probably gave rise by budding to monoecious plants with + the two sexes borne by the same individual; and by a still closer union of + the sexes to hermaphrodite plants, which are now much the commonest form. + (10/63. There is a considerable amount of evidence that all the higher + animals are the descendants of hermaphrodites; and it is a curious problem + whether such hermaphroditism may not have been the result of the + conjugation of two slightly different individuals, which represented the + two incipient sexes. On this view, the higher animals may now owe their + bilateral structure, with all their organs double at an early embryonic + period, to the fusion or conjugation of two primordial individuals.) As + soon as plants became affixed to the ground, their pollen must have been + carried by some means from flower to flower, at first almost certainly by + the wind, then by pollen-devouring, and afterwards by nectar-seeking + insects. During subsequent ages some few entomophilous plants have been + again rendered anemophilous, and some hermaphrodite plants have had their + sexes again separated; and we can vaguely see the advantages of such + recurrent changes under certain conditions. + </p> + <p> + Dioecious plants, however fertilised, have a great advantage over other + plants in their cross-fertilisation being assured. But this advantage is + gained in the case of anemophilous species at the expense of the + production of an enormous superfluity of pollen, with some risk to them + and to entomophilous species of their fertilisation occasionally failing. + Half the individuals, moreover, namely, the males, produce no seed, and + this might possibly be a disadvantage. Delpino remarks that dioecious + plants cannot spread so easily as monoecious and hermaphrodite species, + for a single individual which happened to reach some new site could not + propagate its kind; but it may be doubted whether this is a serious evil. + Monoecious plants can hardly fail to be to a large extent dioecious in + function, owing to the lightness of their pollen and to the wind blowing + laterally, with the great additional advantage of occasionally or often + producing some self-fertilised seeds. When they are also dichogamous, they + are necessarily dioecious in function. Lastly, hermaphrodite plants can + generally produce at least some self-fertilised seeds, and they are at the + same time capable, through the various means specified in this chapter, of + cross-fertilisation. When their structure absolutely prevents + self-fertilisation, they are in the same relative position to one another + as monoecious and dioecious plants, with what may be an advantage, namely, + that every flower is capable of yielding seeds. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0011" id="link2HCH0011"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER XI. THE HABITS OF INSECTS IN RELATION TO THE FERTILISATION OF + FLOWERS. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Insects visit the flowers of the same species as long as they can. + Cause of this habit. + Means by which bees recognise the flowers of the same species. + Sudden secretion of nectar. + Nectar of certain flowers unattractive to certain insects. + Industry of bees, and the number of flowers visited within a short time. + Perforation of the corolla by bees. + Skill shown in the operation. + Hive-bees profit by the holes made by humble-bees. + Effects of habit. + The motive for perforating flowers to save time. + Flowers growing in crowded masses chiefly perforated. +</pre> + <p> + Bees and various other insects must be directed by instinct to search + flowers for nectar and pollen, as they act in this manner without + instruction as soon as they emerge from the pupa state. Their instincts, + however, are not of a specialised nature, for they visit many exotic + flowers as readily as the endemic kinds, and they often search for nectar + in flowers which do not secrete any; and they may be seen attempting to + suck it out of nectaries of such length that it cannot be reached by them. + (11/1. See, on this subject Hermann Muller ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 427; + and Sir J. Lubbock’s ‘British Wild Flowers’ etc. page 20. Muller ‘Bienen + Zeitung’ June 1876 page 119, assigns good reasons for his belief that bees + and many other Hymenoptera have inherited from some early nectar-sucking + progenitor greater skill in robbing flowers than that which is displayed + by insects belonging to the other Orders.) All kinds of bees and certain + other insects usually visit the flowers of the same species as long as + they can, before going to another species. This fact was observed by + Aristotle with respect to the hive-bee more than 2000 years ago, and was + noticed by Dobbs in a paper published in 1736 in the Philosophical + Transactions. It may be observed by any one, both with hive and + humble-bees, in every flower-garden; not that the habit is invariably + followed. Mr. Bennett watched for several hours many plants of Lamium + album, L. purpureum, and another Labiate plant, Nepeta glechoma, all + growing mingled together on a bank near some hives; and he found that each + bee confined its visits to the same species. (11/2. ‘Nature’ 1874 June 4 + page 92.) The pollen of these three plants differs in colour, so that he + was able to test his observations by examining that which adhered to the + bodies of the captured bees, and he found one kind on each bee. + </p> + <p> + Humble and hive-bees are good botanists, for they know that varieties may + differ widely in the colour of their flowers and yet belong to the same + species. I have repeatedly seen humble-bees flying straight from a plant + of the ordinary red Dictamnus fraxinella to a white variety; from one to + another very differently coloured variety of Delphinium consolida and of + Primula veris; from a dark purple to a bright yellow variety of Viola + tricolor; and with two species of Papaver, from one variety to another + which differed much in colour; but in this latter case some of the bees + flew indifferently to either species, although passing by other genera, + and thus acted as if the two species were merely varieties. Hermann Muller + also has seen hive-bees flying from flower to flower of Ranunculus + bulbosus and arvensis, and of Trifolium fragiferum and repens; and even + from blue hyacinths to blue violets. (11/3. ‘Bienen Zeitung’ July 1876 + page 183.) + </p> + <p> + Some species of Diptera or flies keep to the flowers of the same species + with almost as much regularity as do bees; and when captured they are + found covered with pollen. I have seen Rhingia rostrata acting in this + manner with the flowers of Lychnis dioica, Ajuga reptans, and Vici sepium. + Volucella plumosa and Empis cheiroptera flew straight from flower to + flower of Myosotis sylvatica. Dolichopus nigripennis behaved in the same + manner with Potentilla tormentilla; and other Diptera with Stellaria + holostea, Helianthemum vulgare, Bellis perennis, Veronica hederaefolia and + chamoedrys; but some flies visited indifferently the flowers of these two + latter species. I have seen more than once a minute Thrips, with pollen + adhering to its body, fly from one flower to another of the same kind; and + one was observed by me crawling about within a convolvulus with four + grains of pollen adhering to its head, which were deposited on the stigma. + </p> + <p> + Fabricius and Sprengel state that when flies have once entered the flowers + of Aristolochia they never escape,—a statement which I could not + believe, as in this case the insects would not aid in the + cross-fertilisation of the plant; and this statement has now been shown by + Hildebrand to be erroneous. As the spathes of Arum maculatum are furnished + with filaments apparently adapted to prevent the exit of insects, they + resemble in this respect the flowers of Aristolochia; and on examining + several spathes, from thirty to sixty minute Diptera belonging to three + species were found in some of them; and many of these insects were lying + dead at the bottom, as if they had been permanently entrapped. In order to + discover whether the living ones could escape and carry pollen to another + plant, I tied in the spring of 1842 a fine muslin bag tightly round a + spathe; and on returning in an hour’s time several little flies were + crawling about on the inner surface of the bag. I then gathered a spathe + and breathed hard into it; several flies soon crawled out, and all without + exception were dusted with arum pollen. These flies quickly flew away, and + I distinctly saw three of them fly to another plant about a yard off; they + alighted on the inner or concave surface of the spathe, and suddenly flew + down into the flower. I then opened this flower, and although not a single + anther had burst, several grains of pollen were lying at the bottom, which + must have been brought from another plant by one of these flies or by some + other insect. In another flower little flies were crawling about, and I + saw them leave pollen on the stigmas. + </p> + <p> + I do not know whether Lepidoptera generally keep to the flowers of the + same species; but I once observed many minute moths (I believe Lampronia + (Tinea) calthella) apparently eating the pollen of Mercurialis annua, and + they had the whole front of their bodies covered with pollen. I then went + to a female plant some yards off, and saw in the course of fifteen minutes + three of these moths alight on the stigmas. Lepidoptera are probably often + induced to frequent the flowers of the same species, whenever these are + provided with a long and narrow nectary, as in this case other insects + cannot suck the nectar, which will thus be preserved for those having an + elongated proboscis. No doubt the Yucca moth visits only the flowers + whence its name is derived, for a most wonderful instinct guides this moth + to place pollen on the stigma, so that the ovules may be developed on + which the larvae feed. (11/4. Described by Mr. Riley in the ‘American + Naturalist’ volume 7 October 1873.)With respect to Coleoptera, I have seen + Meligethes covered with pollen flying from flower to flower of the same + species; and this must often occur, as, according to M. Brisout, “many of + the species affect only one kind of plant.” (11/5. As quoted in ‘American + Nat.’ May 1873 page 270.) + </p> + <p> + It must not be supposed from these several statements that insects + strictly confine their visits to the same species. They often visit other + species when only a few plants of the same kind grow near together. In a + flower-garden containing some plants of Œnothera, the pollen of which can + easily be recognised, I found not only single grains but masses of it + within many flowers of Mimulus, Digitalis, Antirrhinum, and Linaria. Other + kinds of pollen were likewise detected in these same flowers. A large + number of the stigmas of a plant of Thyme, in which the anthers were + completely aborted, were examined; and these stigmas, though scarcely + larger than a split needle, were covered not only with pollen of Thyme + brought from other plants by the bees, but with several other kinds of + pollen. + </p> + <p> + That insects should visit the flowers of the same species as long as they + can, is of great importance to the plant, as it favours the + cross-fertilisation of distinct individuals of the same species; but no + one will suppose that insects act in this manner for the good of the + plant. The cause probably lies in insects being thus enabled to work + quicker; they have just learnt how to stand in the best position on the + flower, and how far and in what direction to insert their proboscides. + (11/6. Since these remarks were written, I find that Hermann Muller has + come to almost exactly the same conclusion with respect to the cause of + insects frequenting as long as they can the flowers of the same species: + ‘Bienen Zeitung’ July 1876 page 182.) They act on the same principle as + does an artificer who has to make half-a-dozen engines, and who saves time + by making consecutively each wheel and part for all of them. Insects, or + at least bees, seem much influenced by habit in all their manifold + operations; and we shall presently see that this holds good in their + felonious practice of biting holes through the corolla. + </p> + <p> + It is a curious question how bees recognise the flowers of the same + species. That the coloured corolla is the chief guide cannot be doubted. + On a fine day, when hive-bees were incessantly visiting the little blue + flowers of Lobelia erinus, I cut off all the petals of some, and only the + lower striped petals of others, and these flowers were not once again + sucked by the bees, although some actually crawled over them. The removal + of the two little upper petals alone made no difference in their visits. + Mr. J. Anderson likewise states that when he removed the corollas of the + Calceolaria, bees never visited the flowers. (11/7. ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ + 1853 page 534. Kurr cut off the nectaries from a large number of flowers + of several species, and found that the greater number yielded seeds; but + insects probably would not perceive the loss of the nectary until they had + inserted their proboscides into the holes thus formed, and in doing so + would fertilise the flowers. He also removed the whole corolla from a + considerable number of flowers, and these likewise yielded seeds. Flowers + which are self-fertile would naturally produce seeds under these + circumstances; but I am greatly surprised that Delphinium consolida, as + well as another species of Delphinium, and Viola tricolor, should have + produced a fair supply of seeds when thus treated; but it does not appear + that he compared the number of the seeds thus produced with those yielded + by unmutilated flowers left to the free access of insects: ‘Bedeutung der + Nektarien’ 1833 pages 123-135.) On the other hand, in some large masses of + Geranium phaeum which had escaped out of a garden, I observed the unusual + fact of the flowers continuing to secrete an abundance of nectar after all + the petals had fallen off; and the flowers in this state were still + visited by humble-bees. But the bees might have learnt that these flowers + with all their petals lost were still worth visiting, by finding nectar in + those with only one or two lost. The colour alone of the corolla serves as + an approximate guide: thus I watched for some time humble-bees which were + visiting exclusively plants of the white-flowered Spiranthes autumnalis, + growing on short turf at a considerable distance apart; and these bees + often flew within a few inches of several other plants with white flowers, + and then without further examination passed onwards in search of the + Spiranthes. Again, many hive-bees which confined their visits to the + common ling (Calluna vulgaris), repeatedly flew towards Erica tetralix, + evidently attracted by the nearly similar tint of their flowers, and then + instantly passed on in search of the Calluna. + </p> + <p> + That the colour of the flower is not the sole guide, is clearly shown by + the six cases above given of bees which repeatedly passed in a direct line + from one variety to another of the same species, although they bore very + differently coloured flowers. I observed also bees flying in a straight + line from one clump of a yellow-flowered Œnothera to every other clump of + the same plant in the garden, without turning an inch from their course to + plants of Eschscholtzia and others with yellow flowers which lay only a + foot or two on either side. In these cases the bees knew the position of + each plant in the garden perfectly well, as we may infer by the directness + of their flight; so that they were guided by experience and memory. But + how did they discover at first that the above varieties with differently + coloured flowers belonged to the same species? Improbable as it may + appear, they seem, at least sometimes, to recognise plants even from a + distance by their general aspect, in the same manner as we should do. On + three occasions I observed humble-bees flying in a perfectly straight line + from a tall larkspur (Delphinium) which was in full flower to another + plant of the same species at the distance of fifteen yards which had not + as yet a single flower open, and on which the buds showed only a faint + tinge of blue. Here neither odour nor the memory of former visits could + have come into play, and the tinge of blue was so faint that it could + hardly have served as a guide. (11/8. A fact mentioned by Hermann Muller + ‘Die Befruchtung’ etc. page 347, shows that bees possess acute powers of + vision and discrimination; for those engaged in collecting pollen from + Primula elatior invariably passed by the flowers of the long-styled form, + in which the anthers are seated low down in the tubular corolla. Yet the + difference in aspect between the long-styled and short-styled forms is + extremely slight.) + </p> + <p> + The conspicuousness of the corolla does not suffice to induce repeated + visits from insects, unless nectar is at the same time secreted, together + perhaps with some odour emitted. I watched for a fortnight many times + daily a wall covered with Linaria cymbalaria in full flower, and never saw + a bee even looking at one. There was then a very hot day, and suddenly + many bees were industriously at work on the flowers. It appears that a + certain degree of heat is necessary for the secretion of nectar; for I + observed with Lobelia erinus that if the sun ceased to shine for only half + an hour, the visits of the bees slackened and soon ceased. An analogous + fact with respect to the sweet excretion from the stipules of Vicia sativa + has been already given. As in the case of the Linaria, so with Pedicularis + sylvatica, Polygala vulgaris, Viola tricolor, and some species of + Trifolium, I have watched the flowers day after day without seeing a bee + at work, and then suddenly all the flowers were visited by many bees. Now + how did so many bees discover at once that the flowers were secreting + nectar? I presume that it must have been by their odour; and that as soon + as a few bees began to suck the flowers, others of the same and of + different kinds observed the fact and profited by it. We shall presently + see, when we treat of the perforation of the corolla, that bees are fully + capable of profiting by the labour of other species. Memory also comes + into play, for, as already remarked, bees know the position of each clump + of flowers in a garden. I have repeatedly seen them passing round a + corner, but otherwise in as straight a line as possible, from one plant of + Fraxinella and of Linaria to another and distant one of the same species; + although, owing to the intervention of other plants, the two were not in + sight of each other. + </p> + <p> + It would appear that either the taste or the odour of the nectar of + certain flowers is unattractive to hive or to humble-bees, or to both; for + there seems no other reason why certain open flowers which secrete nectar + are not visited by them. The small quantity of nectar secreted by some of + these flowers can hardly be the cause of their neglect, as hive-bees + search eagerly for the minute drops on the glands on the leaves of the + Prunus laurocerasus. Even the bees from different hives sometimes visit + different kinds of flowers, as is said to be the case by Mr. Grant with + respect to the Polyanthus and Viola tricolor. (11/9. ‘Gardeners’ + Chronicle’ 1844 page 374.) I have known humble-bees to visit the flowers + of Lobelia fulgens in one garden and not in another at the distance of + only a few miles. The cupful of nectar in the labellum of Epipactis + latifolia is never touched by hive- or humble-bees, although I have seen + them flying close by; and yet the nectar has a pleasant taste to us, and + is habitually consumed by the common wasp. As far as I have seen, wasps + seek for nectar in this country only from the flowers of this Epipactis, + Scrophularia aquatica, Symphoricarpus racemosa (11/10. The same fact + apparently holds good in Italy, for Delpino says that the flowers of these + three plants are alone visited by wasps: ‘Nettarii Estranuziali, Bulletino + Entomologico’ anno 6.), and Tritoma; the two former plants being endemic, + and the two latter exotic. As wasps are so fond of sugar and of any sweet + fluid, and as they do not disdain the minute drops on the glands of Prunus + laurocerasus, it is a strange fact that they do not suck the nectar of + many open flowers, which they could do without the aid of a proboscis. + Hive-bees visit the flowers of the Symphoricarpus and Tritoma, and this + makes it all the stranger that they do not visit the flowers of the + Epipactis, or, as far as I have seen, those of the Scrophularia aquatica; + although they do visit the flowers of Scrophularia nodosa, at least in + North America. (11/11. ‘Silliman’s American Journal of Science’ August + 1871.) + </p> + <p> + The extraordinary industry of bees and the number of flowers which they + visit within a short time, so that each flower is visited repeatedly, must + greatly increase the chance of each receiving pollen from a distinct + plant. When the nectar is in any way hidden, bees cannot tell without + inserting their proboscides whether it has lately been exhausted by other + bees, and this, as remarked in a former chapter, forces them to visit many + more flowers than they otherwise would. But they endeavour to lose as + little time as they can; thus in flowers having several nectaries, if they + find one dry they do not try the others, but as I have often observed, + pass on to another flower. They work so industriously and effectually, + that even in the case of social plants, of which hundreds of thousands + grow together, as with the several kinds of heath, every single flower is + visited, of which evidence will presently be given. They lose no time and + fly very quickly from plant to plant, but I do not know the rate at which + hive-bees fly. Humble-bees fly at the rate of ten miles an hour, as I was + able to ascertain in the case of the males from their curious habit of + calling at certain fixed points, which made it easy to measure the time + taken in passing from one place to another. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the number of flowers which bees visit in a given time, I + observed that in exactly one minute a humble-bee visited twenty-four of + the closed flowers of the Linaria cymbalaria; another bee visited in the + same time twenty-two flowers of the Symphoricarpus racemosa; and another + seventeen flowers on two plants of a Delphinium. In the course of fifteen + minutes a single flower on the summit of a plant of Œnothera was visited + eight times by several humble-bees, and I followed the last of these bees, + whilst it visited in the course of a few additional minutes every plant of + the same species in a large flower-garden. In nineteen minutes every + flower on a small plant of Nemophila insignis was visited twice. In one + minute six flowers of a Campanula were entered by a pollen-collecting + hive-bee; and bees when thus employed work slower than when sucking + nectar. Lastly, seven flower-stalks on a plant of Dictamnus fraxinella + were observed on the 15th of June 1841 during ten minutes; they were + visited by thirteen humble-bees each of which entered many flowers. On the + 22nd the same flower-stalks were visited within the same time by eleven + humble-bees. This plant bore altogether 280 flowers, and from the above + data, taking into consideration how late in the evening humble-bees work, + each flower must have been visited at least thirty times daily, and the + same flower keeps open during several days. The frequency of the visits of + bees is also sometimes shown by the manner in which the petals are + scratched by their hooked tarsi; I have seen large beds of Mimulus, + Stachys, and Lathyrus with the beauty of their flowers thus sadly defaced. + </p> + <h3> + PERFORATION OF THE COROLLA BY BEES. + </h3> + <p> + I have already alluded to bees biting holes in flowers for the sake of + obtaining the nectar. They often act in this manner, both with endemic and + exotic species, in many parts of Europe, in the United States, and in the + Himalaya; and therefore probably in all parts of the world. The plants, + the fertilisation of which actually depends on insects entering the + flowers, will fail to produce seed when their nectar is stolen from the + outside; and even with those species which are capable of fertilising + themselves without any aid, there can be no cross-fertilisation, and this, + as we know, is a serious evil in most cases. The extent to which + humble-bees carry on the practice of biting holes is surprising: a + remarkable case was observed by me near Bournemouth, where there were + formerly extensive heaths. I took a long walk, and every now and then + gathered a twig of Erica tetralix, and when I had got a handful all the + flowers were examined through a lens. This process was repeated many + times; but though many hundreds were examined, I did not succeed in + finding a single flower which had not been perforated. Humble-bees were at + the time sucking the flowers through these perforations. On the following + day a large number of flowers were examined on another heath with the same + result, but here hive-bees were sucking through the holes. This case is + all the more remarkable, as the innumerable holes had been made within a + fortnight, for before that time I saw the bees everywhere sucking in the + proper manner at the mouths of the corolla. In an extensive flower-garden + some large beds of Salvia grahami, Stachys coccinea, and Pentstemon + argutus (?) had every flower perforated, and many scores were examined. I + have seen whole fields of red clover (Trifolium pratense) in the same + state. Dr. Ogle found that 90 per cent of the flowers of Salvia glutinosa + had been bitten. In the United States Mr. Bailey says it is difficult to + find a blossom of the native Gerardia pedicularia without a hole in it; + and Mr. Gentry, in speaking of the introduced Wistaria sinensis, says + “that nearly every flower had been perforated.” (11/12. Dr. Ogle ‘Pop. + Science Review’ July 1869 page 267. Bailey ‘American Naturalist’ November + 1873 page 690. Gentry ibid May 1875 page 264.) + </p> + <p> + As far as I have seen, it is always humble-bees which first bite the + holes, and they are well fitted for the work by possessing powerful + mandibles; but hive-bees afterwards profit by the holes thus made. Dr. + Hermann Muller, however, writes to me that hive-bees sometimes bite holes + through the flowers of Erica tetralix. No insects except bees, with the + single exception of wasps in the case of Tritoma, have sense enough, as + far as I have observed, to profit by the holes already made. Even + humble-bees do not always discover that it would be advantageous to them + to perforate certain flowers. There is an abundant supply of nectar in the + nectary of Tropaeolum tricolor, yet I have found this plant untouched in + more than one garden, while the flowers of other plants had been + extensively perforated; but a few years ago Sir J. Lubbock’s gardener + assured me that he had seen humble-bees boring through the nectary of this + Tropaeolum. Muller has observed humble-bees trying to suck at the mouths + of the flowers of Primula elatior and of an Aquilegia, and, failing in + their attempts, they made holes through the corolla; but they often bite + holes, although they could with very little more trouble obtain the nectar + in a legitimate manner by the mouth of the corolla. + </p> + <p> + Dr. W. Ogle has communicated to me a curious case. He gathered in + Switzerland 100 flower-stems of the common blue variety of the monkshood + (Aconitum napellus), and not a single flower was perforated; he then + gathered 100 stems of a white variety growing close by, and every one of + the open flowers had been perforated. (11/13. Dr. Ogle ‘Popular Science + Review’ July 1869 page 267. Bailey ‘American Naturalist’ November 1873 + page 690. Gentry ibid May 1875 page 264.) This surprising difference in + the state of the flowers may be attributed with much probability to the + blue variety being distasteful to bees, from the presence of the acrid + matter which is so general in the Ranunculaceae, and to its absence in the + white variety in correlation with the loss of the blue tint. According to + Sprengel, this plant is strongly proterandrous (11/14. ‘Das Entdeckte’ + etc. page 278.); it would therefore be more or less sterile unless bees + carried pollen from the younger to the older flowers. Consequently the + white variety, the flowers of which were always bitten instead of being + properly entered by the bees, would fail to yield the full number of seeds + and would be a comparatively rare plant, as Dr. Ogle informs me was the + case. + </p> + <p> + Bees show much skill in their manner of working, for they always make + their holes from the outside close to the spot where the nectar lies + hidden within the corolla. All the flowers in a large bed of Stachys + coccinea had either one or two slits made on the upper side of the corolla + near the base. The flowers of a Mirabilis and of Salvia coccinea were + perforated in the same manner; whilst those of Salvia grahami, in which + the calyx is much elongated, had both the calyx and the corolla invariably + perforated. The flowers of Pentstemon argutus are broader than those of + the plants just named, and two holes alongside each other had here always + been made just above the calyx. In these several cases the perforations + were on the upper side, but in Antirrhinum majus one or two holes had been + made on the lower side, close to the little protuberance which represents + the nectary, and therefore directly in front of and close to the spot + where the nectar is secreted. + </p> + <p> + But the most remarkable case of skill and judgment known to me, is that of + the perforation of the flowers of Lathyrus sylvestris, as described by my + son Francis. (11/15. ‘Nature’ January 8, 1874 page 189.) The nectar in + this plant is enclosed within a tube, formed by the united stamens, which + surround the pistil so closely that a bee is forced to insert its + proboscis outside the tube; but two natural rounded passages or orifices + are left in the tube near the base, in order that the nectar may be + reached by the bees. Now my son found in sixteen out of twenty-four + flowers on this plant, and in eleven out of sixteen of those on the + cultivated everlasting pea, which is either a variety of the same species + or a closely allied one, that the left passage was larger than the right + one. And here comes the remarkable point,—the humble-bees bite holes + through the standard-petal, and they always operated on the left side over + the passage, which is generally the larger of the two. My son remarks: “It + is difficult to say how the bees could have acquired this habit. Whether + they discovered the inequality in the size of the nectar-holes in sucking + the flowers in the proper way, and then utilised this knowledge in + determining where to gnaw the hole; or whether they found out the best + situation by biting through the standard at various points, and afterwards + remembered its situation in visiting other flowers. But in either case + they show a remarkable power of making use of what they have learnt by + experience.” It seems probable that bees owe their skill in biting holes + through flowers of all kinds to their having long practised the instinct + of moulding cells and pots of wax, or of enlarging their old cocoons with + tubes of wax; for they are thus compelled to work on the inside and + outside of the same object. + </p> + <p> + In the early part of the summer of 1857 I was led to observe during some + weeks several rows of the scarlet kidney-bean (Phaseolus multiflorus), + whilst attending to the fertilisation of this plant, and daily saw humble- + and hive-bees sucking at the mouths of the flowers. But one day I found + several humble-bees employed in cutting holes in flower after flower; and + on the next day every single hive-bee, without exception, instead of + alighting on the left wing-petal and sucking the flower in the proper + manner, flew straight without the least hesitation to the calyx, and + sucked through the holes which had been made only the day before by the + humble-bees; and they continued this habit for many following days. + (11/16. ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1857 page 725.) Mr. Belt has communicated + to me (July 28th, 1874) a similar case, with the sole difference that less + than half of the flowers had been perforated by the humble-bees; + nevertheless, all the hive-bees gave up sucking at the mouths of the + flowers and visited exclusively the bitten ones. Now how did the hive-bees + find out so quickly that holes had been made? Instinct seems to be out of + the question, as the plant is an exotic. The holes cannot be seen by bees + whilst standing on the wing-petals, where they had always previously + alighted. From the ease with which bees were deceived when the petals of + Lobelia erinus were cut off, it was clear that in this case they were not + guided to the nectar by its smell; and it may be doubted whether they were + attracted to the holes in the flowers of the Phaseolus by the odour + emitted from them. Did they perceive the holes by the sense of touch in + their proboscides, whilst sucking the flowers in the proper manner, and + then reason that it would save them time to alight on the outside of the + flowers and use the holes? This seems almost too abstruse an act of reason + for bees; and it is more probable that they saw the humble-bees at work, + and understanding what they were about, imitated them and took advantage + of the shorter path to the nectar. Even with animals high in the scale, + such as monkeys, we should be surprised at hearing that all the + individuals of one species within the space of twenty-four hours + understood an act performed by a distinct species, and profited by it. + </p> + <p> + I have repeatedly observed with various kinds of flowers that all the hive + and humble-bees which were sucking through the perforations, flew to them, + whether on the upper or under side of the corolla, without the least + hesitation; and this shows how quickly all the individuals within the + district had acquired the same knowledge. Yet habit comes into play to a + certain extent, as in so many of the other operations of bees. Dr. Ogle, + Messrs. Farrer and Belt have observed in the case of Phaseolus multiflorus + that certain individuals went exclusively to the perforations, while + others of the same species visited only the mouths of the flowers. (11/17. + Dr. Ogle ‘Pop. Science Review’ April 1870 page 167. Mr. Farrer ‘Annals and + Magazine of Natural History’ 4th series volume 2 1868 page 258. Mr. Belt + in a letter to me.) I noticed in 1861 exactly the same fact with Trifolium + pratense. So persistent is the force of habit, that when a bee which is + visiting perforated flowers comes to one which has not been bitten, it + does not go to the mouth, but instantly flies away in search of another + bitten flower. Nevertheless, I once saw a humble-bee visiting the hybrid + Rhododendron azaloides, and it entered the mouths of some flowers and cut + holes into the others. Dr. Hermann Muller informs me that in the same + district he has seen some individuals of Bombus mastrucatus boring through + the calyx and corolla of Rhinanthus alecterolophus, and others through the + corolla alone. Different species of bees may, however, sometimes be + observed acting differently at the same time on the same plant. I have + seen hive-bees sucking at the mouths of the flowers of the common bean; + humble-bees of one kind sucking through holes bitten in the calyx, and + humble-bees of another kind sucking the little drops of fluid excreted by + the stipules. Mr. Beal of Michigan informs me that the flowers of the + Missouri currant (Ribes aureum) abound with nectar, so that children often + suck them; and he saw hive-bees sucking through holes made by a bird, the + oriole, and at the same time humble-bees sucking in the proper manner at + the mouths of the flowers. (11/18. The flowers of the Ribes are however + sometimes perforated by humble-bees, and Mr. Bundy says that they were + able to bite through and rob seven flowers of their honey in a minute: + ‘American Naturalist’ 1876 page 238.) This statement about the oriole + calls to mind what I have before said of certain species of humming-birds + boring holes through the flowers of the Brugmansia, whilst other species + entered by the mouth. + </p> + <p> + The motive which impels bees to gnaw holes through the corolla seems to be + the saving of time, for they lose much time in climbing into and out of + large flowers, and in forcing their heads into closed ones. They were able + to visit nearly twice as many flowers, as far as I could judge, of a + Stachys and Pentstemon by alighting on the upper surface of the corolla + and sucking through the cut holes, than by entering in the proper way. + Nevertheless each bee before it has had much practice, must lose some time + in making each new perforation, especially when the perforation has to be + made through both calyx and corolla. This action therefore implies + foresight, of which faculty we have abundant evidence in their building + operations; and may we not further believe that some trace of their social + instinct, that is, of working for the good of other members of the + community, may here likewise play a part? + </p> + <p> + Many years ago I was struck with the fact that humble-bees as a general + rule perforate flowers only when these grow in large numbers near + together. In a garden where there were some very large beds of Stachys + coccinea and of Pentstemon argutus, every single flower was perforated, + but I found two plants of the former species growing quite separate with + their petals much scratched, showing that they had been frequently visited + by bees, and yet not a single flower was perforated. I found also a + separate plant of the Pentstemon, and saw bees entering the mouth of the + corolla, and not a single flower had been perforated. In the following + year (1842) I visited the same garden several times: on the 19th of July + humble-bees were sucking the flowers of Stachys coccinea and Salvia + grahami in the proper manner, and none of the corollas were perforated. On + the 7th of August all the flowers were perforated, even those on some few + plants of the Salvia which grew at a little distance from the great bed. + On the 21st of August only a few flowers on the summits of the spikes of + both species remained fresh, and not one of these was now bored. Again, in + my own garden every plant in several rows of the common bean had many + flowers perforated; but I found three plants in separate parts of the + garden which had sprung up accidentally, and these had not a single flower + perforated. General Strachey formerly saw many perforated flowers in a + garden in the Himalaya, and he wrote to the owner to inquire whether this + relation between the plants growing crowded and their perforation by the + bees there held good, and was answered in the affirmative. Hence it + follows that the red clover (Trifolium pratense) and the common bean when + cultivated in great masses in fields,—that Erica tetralix growing in + large numbers on heaths,—rows of the scarlet kidney-bean in the + kitchen-garden,—and masses of any species in the flower-garden,—are + all eminently liable to be perforated. + </p> + <p> + The explanation of this fact is not difficult. Flowers growing in large + numbers afford a rich booty to the bees, and are conspicuous from a + distance. They are consequently visited by crowds of these insects, and I + once counted between twenty and thirty bees flying about a bed of + Pentstemon. They are thus stimulated to work quickly by rivalry, and, what + is much more important, they find a large proportion of the flowers, as + suggested by my son, with their nectaries sucked dry. (11/19. ‘Nature’ + January 8, 1874 page 189.) They thus waste much time in searching many + empty flowers, and are led to bite the holes, so as to find out as quickly + as possible whether there is any nectar present, and if so, to obtain it. + </p> + <p> + Flowers which are partially or wholly sterile unless visited by insects in + the proper manner, such as those of most species of Salvia, of Trifolium + pratense, Phaseolus multiflorus, etc., will fail more or less completely + to produce seeds if the bees confine their visits to the perforations. The + perforated flowers of those species, which are capable of fertilising + themselves, will yield only self-fertilised seeds, and the seedlings will + in consequence be less vigorous. Therefore all plants must suffer in some + degree when bees obtain their nectar in a felonious manner by biting holes + through the corolla; and many species, it might be thought, would thus be + exterminated. But here, as is so general throughout nature, there is a + tendency towards a restored equilibrium. If a plant suffers from being + perforated, fewer individuals will be reared, and if its nectar is highly + important to the bees, these in their turn will suffer and decrease in + number; but, what is much more effective, as soon as the plant becomes + somewhat rare so as not to grow in crowded masses, the bees will no longer + be stimulated to gnaw holes in the flowers, but will enter them in a + legitimate manner. More seed will then be produced, and the seedlings + being the product of cross-fertilisation will be vigorous, so that the + species will tend to increase in number, to be again checked, as soon as + the plant again grows in crowded masses. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2HCH0012" id="link2HCH0012"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAPTER XII. GENERAL RESULTS. + </h2> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Cross-fertilisation proved to be beneficial, and self-fertilisation + injurious. + Allied species differ greatly in the means by which cross-fertilisation + is favoured and self-fertilisation avoided. + The benefits and evils of the two processes depend on the degree of + differentiation in the sexual elements. + The evil effects not due to the combination of morbid tendencies in the + parents. + Nature of the conditions to which plants are subjected when growing near + together in a state of nature or under culture, and the effects of such + conditions. + Theoretical considerations with respect to the interaction of + differentiated sexual elements. + Practical lessons. + Genesis of the two sexes. + Close correspondence between the effects of cross-fertilisation and + self-fertilisation, and of the legitimate and illegitimate unions of + heterostyled plants, in comparison with hybrid unions. +</pre> + <p> + The first and most important of the conclusions which may be drawn from + the observations given in this volume, is that cross-fertilisation is + generally beneficial, and self-fertilisation injurious. This is shown by + the difference in height, weight, constitutional vigour, and fertility of + the offspring from crossed and self-fertilised flowers, and in the number + of seeds produced by the parent-plants. With respect to the second of + these two propositions, namely, that self-fertilisation is generally + injurious, we have abundant evidence. The structure of the flowers in such + plants as Lobelia ramosa, Digitalis purpurea, etc., renders the aid of + insects almost indispensable for their fertilisation; and bearing in mind + the prepotency of pollen from a distinct individual over that from the + same individual, such plants will almost certainly have been crossed + during many or all previous generations. So it must be, owing merely to + the prepotency of foreign pollen, with cabbages and various other plants, + the varieties of which almost invariably intercross when grown together. + The same inference may be drawn still more surely with respect to those + plants, such as Reseda and Eschscholtzia, which are sterile with their own + pollen, but fertile with that from any other individual. These several + plants must therefore have been crossed during a long series of previous + generations, and the artificial crosses in my experiments cannot have + increased the vigour of the offspring beyond that of their progenitors. + Therefore the difference between the self-fertilised and crossed plants + raised by me cannot be attributed to the superiority of the crossed, but + to the inferiority of the self-fertilised seedlings, due to the injurious + effects of self-fertilisation. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the first proposition, namely, that cross-fertilisation is + generally beneficial, we likewise have excellent evidence. Plants of + Ipomoea were intercrossed for nine successive generations; they were then + again intercrossed, and at the same time crossed with a plant of a fresh + stock, that is, one brought from another garden; and the offspring of this + latter cross were to the intercrossed plants in height as 100 to 78, and + in fertility as 100 to 51. An analogous experiment with Eschscholtzia gave + a similar result, as far as fertility was concerned. In neither of these + cases were any of the plants the product of self-fertilisation. Plants of + Dianthus were self-fertilised for three generations, and this no doubt was + injurious; but when these plants were fertilised by a fresh stock and by + intercrossed plants of the same stock, there was a great difference in + fertility between the two sets of seedlings, and some difference in their + height. Petunia offers a nearly parallel case. With various other plants, + the wonderful effects of a cross with a fresh stock may be seen in Table + 7/C. Several accounts have also been published of the extraordinary growth + of seedlings from a cross between two varieties of the same species, some + of which are known never to fertilise themselves; so that here neither + self-fertilisation nor relationship even in a remote degree can have come + into play. (12/1. See ‘Variation under Domestication’ chapter 19 2nd + edition volume 2 page 159.) We may therefore conclude that the above two + propositions are true,—that cross-fertilisation is generally + beneficial and self-fertilisation injurious to the offspring. + </p> + <p> + That certain plants, for instance, Viola tricolor, Digitalis purpurea, + Sarothamnus scoparius, Cyclamen persicum, etc., which have been naturally + cross-fertilised for many or all previous generations, should suffer to an + extreme degree from a single act of self-fertilisation is a most + surprising fact. Nothing of the kkind has been observed in our domestic + animals; but then we must remember that the closest possible interbreeding + with such animals, that is, between brothers and sisters, cannot be + considered as nearly so close a union as that between the pollen and + ovules of the same flower. Whether the evil from self-fertilisation goes + on increasing during successive generations is not as yet known; but we + may infer from my experiments that the increase if any is far from rapid. + After plants have been propagated by self-fertilisation for several + generations, a single cross with a fresh stock restores their pristine + vigour; and we have a strictly analogous result with our domestic animals. + (12/2. Ibid chapter 19 2nd edition volume 2 page 159.) The good effects of + cross-fertilisation are transmitted by plants to the next generation; and + judging from the varieties of the common pea, to many succeeding + generations. But this may merely be that crossed plants of the first + generation are extremely vigorous, and transmit their vigour, like any + other character, to their successors. + </p> + <p> + Notwithstanding the evil which many plants suffer from self-fertilisation, + they can be thus propagated under favourable conditions for many + generations, as shown by some of my experiments, and more especially by + the survival during at least half a century of the same varieties of the + common pea and sweet-pea. The same conclusion probably holds good with + several other exotic plants, which are never or most rarely + cross-fertilised in this country. But all these plants, as far as they + have been tried, profit greatly by a cross with a fresh stock. Some few + plants, for instance, Ophrys apifera, have almost certainly been + propagated in a state of nature for thousands of generations without + having been once intercrossed; and whether they would profit by a cross + with a fresh stock is not known. But such cases ought not to make us doubt + that as a general rule crossing is beneficial, any more than the existence + of plants which, in a state of nature, are propagated exclusively by + rhizomes, stolons, etc. (their flowers never producing seeds), (12/3. I + have given several cases in my ‘Variation under Domestication’ chapter 18 + 2nd edition volume 2 page 152.) (their flowers never producing seeds), + should make us doubt that seminal generation must have some great + advantage, as it is the common plan followed by nature. Whether any + species has been reproduced asexually from a very remote period cannot, of + course, be ascertained. Our sole means for forming any judgment on this + head is the duration of the varieties of our fruit trees which have been + long propagated by grafts or buds. Andrew Knight formerly maintained that + under these circumstances they always become weakly, but this conclusion + has been warmly disputed by others. A recent and competent judge, + Professor Asa Gray, leans to the side of Andrew Knight, which seems to me, + from such evidence as I have been able to collect, the more probable view, + notwithstanding many opposed facts. (12/4. ‘Darwiniana: Essays and Reviews + pertaining to Darwinism’ 1876 page 338.) + </p> + <p> + The means for favouring cross-fertilisation and preventing + self-fertilisation, or conversely for favouring self-fertilisation and + preventing to a certain extent cross-fertilisation, are wonderfully + diversified; and it is remarkable that these differ widely in closely + allied plants,—in the species of the same genus, and sometimes in + the individuals of the same species. (12/5. Hildebrand has insisted + strongly to this effect in his valuable observations on the fertilisation + of the Gramineae: ‘Monatsbericht K. Akad. Berlin’ October 1872 page 763.) + It is not rare to find hermaphrodite plants and others with separated + sexes within the same genus; and it is common to find some of the species + dichogamous and others maturing their sexual elements simultaneously. The + dichogamous genus Saxifraga contains proterandrous and proterogynous + species. (12/6. Dr. Engler ‘Botanische Zeitung’ 1868 page 833.) Several + genera include both heterostyled (dimorphic or trimorphic forms) and + homostyled species. Ophrys offers a remarkable instance of one species + having its structure manifestly adapted for self-fertilisation, and other + species as manifestly adapted for cross-fertilisation. Some con-generic + species are quite sterile and others quite fertile with their own pollen. + From these several causes we often find within the same genus species + which do not produce seeds, while others produce an abundance, when + insects are excluded. Some species bear cleistogene flowers which cannot + be crossed, as well as perfect flowers, whilst others in the same genus + never produce cleistogene flowers. Some species exist under two forms, the + one bearing conspicuous flowers adapted for cross-fertilisation, the other + bearing inconspicuous flowers adapted for self-fertilisation, whilst other + species in the same genus present only a single form. Even with the + individuals of the same species, the degree of self-sterility varies + greatly, as in Reseda. With polygamous plants, the distribution of the + sexes differs in the individuals of the same species. The relative period + at which the sexual elements in the same flower are mature, differs in the + varieties of Pelargonium; and Carriere gives several cases, showing that + the period varies according to the temperature to which the plants are + exposed. (12/7. ‘Des Varieties’ 1865 page 30.) + </p> + <p> + This extraordinary diversity in the means for favouring or preventing + cross- and self-fertilisation in closely allied forms, probably depends on + the results of both processes being highly beneficial to the species, but + directly opposed in many ways to one another and dependent on variable + conditions. Self-fertilisation assures the production of a large supply of + seeds; and the necessity or advantage of this will be determined by the + average length of life of the plant, which largely depends on the amount + of destruction suffered by the seeds and seedlings. This destruction + follows from the most various and variable causes, such as the presence of + animals of several kinds, and the growth of surrounding plants. The + possibility of cross-fertilisation depends mainly on the presence and + number of certain insects, often of insects belonging to special groups, + and on the degree to which they are attracted to the flowers of any + particular species in preference to other flowers,—all circumstances + likely to change. Moreover, the advantages which follow from + cross-fertilisation differ much in different plants, so that it is + probable that allied plants would often profit in different degrees by + cross-fertilisation. Under these extremely complex and fluctuating + conditions, with two somewhat opposed ends to be gained, namely, the safe + propagation of the species and the production of cross-fertilised, + vigorous offspring, it is not surprising that allied forms should exhibit + an extreme diversity in the means which favour either end. If, as there is + reason to suspect, self-fertilisation is in some respects beneficial, + although more than counterbalanced by the advantages derived from a cross + with a fresh stock, the problem becomes still more complicated. + </p> + <p> + As I only twice experimented on more than a single species in a genus, I + cannot say whether the crossed offspring of the several species within the + same genus differ in their degree of superiority over their + self-fertilised brethren; but I should expect that this would often prove + to be the case from what was observed with the two species of Lobelia and + with the individuals of the same species of Nicotiana. The species + belonging to distinct genera in the same family certainly differ in this + respect. The effects of cross- and self-fertilisation may be confined + either to the growth or to the fertility of the offspring, but generally + extends to both qualities. There does not seem to exist any close + correspondence between the degree to which their offspring profit by this + process; but we may easily err on this head, as there are two means for + ensuring cross-fertilisation which are not externally perceptible, namely, + self-sterility and the prepotent fertilising influence of pollen from + another individual. Lastly, it has been shown in a former chapter that the + effect produced by cross and self-fertilisation on the fertility of the + parent-plants does not always correspond with that produced on the height, + vigour, and fertility of their offspring. The same remark applies to + crossed and self-fertilised seedlings when these are used as the + parent-plants. This want of correspondence probably depends, at least in + part, on the number of seeds produced being chiefly determined by the + number of the pollen-tubes which reach the ovules, and this will be + governed by the reaction between the pollen and the stigmatic secretion or + tissues; whereas the growth and constitutional vigour of the offspring + will be chiefly determined, not only by the number of pollen-tubes + reaching the ovules, but by the nature of the reaction between the + contents of the pollen-grains and ovules. + </p> + <p> + There are two other important conclusions which may be deduced from my + observations: firstly, that the advantages of cross-fertilisation do not + follow from some mysterious virtue in the mere union of two distinct + individuals, but from such individuals having been subjected during + previous generations to different conditions, or to their having varied in + a manner commonly called spontaneous, so that in either case their sexual + elements have been in some degree differentiated. And secondly, that the + injury from self-fertilisation follows from the want of such + differentiation in the sexual elements. These two propositions are fully + established by my experiments. Thus, when plants of the Ipomoea and of the + Mimulus, which had been self-fertilised for the seven previous generations + and had been kept all the time under the same conditions, were + intercrossed one with another, the offspring did not profit in the least + by the cross. Mimulus offers another instructive case, showing that the + benefit of a cross depends on the previous treatment of the progenitors: + plants which had been self-fertilised for the eight previous generations + were crossed with plants which had been intercrossed for the same number + of generations, all having been kept under the same conditions as far as + possible; seedlings from this cross were grown in competition with others + derived from the same self-fertilised mother-plant crossed by a fresh + stock; and the latter seedlings were to the former in height as 100 to 52, + and in fertility as 100 to 4. An exactly parallel experiment was tried on + Dianthus, with this difference, that the plants had been self-fertilised + only for the three previous generations, and the result was similar though + not so strongly marked. The foregoing two cases of the offspring of + Ipomoea and Eschscholtzia, derived from a cross with a fresh stock, being + as much superior to the intercrossed plants of the old stock, as these + latter were to the self-fertilised offspring, strongly supports the same + conclusion. A cross with a fresh stock or with another variety seems to be + always highly beneficial, whether or not the mother-plants have been + intercrossed or self-fertilised for several previous generations. The fact + that a cross between two flowers on the same plant does no good or very + little good, is likewise a strong corroboration of our conclusion; for the + sexual elements in the flowers on the same plant can rarely have been + differentiated, though this is possible, as flower-buds are in one sense + distinct individuals, sometimes varying and differing from one another in + structure or constitution. Thus the proposition that the benefit from + cross-fertilisation depends on the plants which are crossed having been + subjected during previous generations to somewhat different conditions, or + to their having varied from some unknown cause as if they had been thus + subjected, is securely fortified on all sides. + </p> + <p> + Before proceeding any further, the view which has been maintained by + several physiologists must be noticed, namely, that all the evils from + breeding animals too closely, and no doubt, as they would say, from the + self-fertilisation of plants, is the result of the increase of some morbid + tendency or weakness of constitution common to the closely related + parents, or to the two sexes of hermaphrodite plants. Undoubtedly injury + has often thus resulted; but it is a vain attempt to extend this view to + the numerous cases given in my Tables. It should be remembered that the + same mother-plant was both self-fertilised and crossed, so that if she had + been unhealthy she would have transmitted half her morbid tendencies to + her crossed offspring. But plants appearing perfectly healthy, some of + them growing wild, or the immediate offspring of wild plants, or vigorous + common garden-plants, were selected for experiment. Considering the number + of species which were tried, it is nothing less than absurd to suppose + that in all these cases the mother-plants, though not appearing in any way + diseased, were weak or unhealthy in so peculiar a manner that their + self-fertilised seedlings, many hundreds in number, were rendered inferior + in height, weight, constitutional vigour and fertility to their crossed + offspring. Moreover, this belief cannot be extended to the strongly marked + advantages which invariably follow, as far as my experience serves, from + intercrossing the individuals of the same variety or of distinct + varieties, if these have been subjected during some generations to + different conditions. + </p> + <p> + It is obvious that the exposure of two sets of plants during several + generations to different conditions can lead to no beneficial results, as + far as crossing is concerned, unless their sexual elements are thus + affected. That every organism is acted on to a certain extent by a change + in its environment, will not, I presume, be disputed. It is hardly + necessary to advance evidence on this head; we can perceive the difference + between individual plants of the same species which have grown in somewhat + more shady or sunny, dry or damp places. Plants which have been propagated + for some generations under different climates or at different seasons of + the year transmit different constitutions to their seedlings. Under such + circumstances, the chemical constitution of their fluids and the nature of + their tissues are often modified. (12/8. Numerous cases together with + references are given in my ‘Variation under Domestication’ chapter 23 2nd + edition volume 2 page 264. With respect to animals, Mr. Brackenridge ‘A + Contribution to the Theory of Diathesis’ Edinburgh 1869, has well shown + that the different organs of animals are excited into different degrees of + activity by differences of temperature and food, and become to a certain + extent adapted to them.) Many other such facts could be adduced. In short, + every alteration in the function of a part is probably connected with some + corresponding, though often quite imperceptible change in structure or + composition. + </p> + <p> + Whatever affects an organism in any way, likewise tends to act on its + sexual elements. We see this in the inheritance of newly acquired + modifications, such as those from the increased use or disuse of a part, + and even from mutilations if followed by disease. (12/9. ‘Variation under + Domestication’ chapter 12 2nd edition volume 1 page 466.) We have abundant + evidence how susceptible the reproductive system is to changed conditions, + in the many instances of animals rendered sterile by confinement; so that + they will not unite, or if they unite do not produce offspring, though the + confinement may be far from close; and of plants rendered sterile by + cultivation. But hardly any cases afford more striking evidence how + powerfully a change in the conditions of life acts on the sexual elements, + than those already given, of plants which are completely self-sterile in + one country, and when brought to another, yield, even in the first + generation, a fair supply of self-fertilised seeds. + </p> + <p> + But it may be said, granting that changed conditions act on the sexual + elements, how can two or more plants growing close together, either in + their native country or in a garden, be differently acted on, inasmuch as + they appear to be exposed to exactly the same conditions? Although this + question has been already considered, it deserves further consideration + under several points of view. In my experiments with Digitalis purpurea, + some flowers on a wild plant were self-fertilised, and others were crossed + with pollen from another plant growing within two or three feet’s + distance. The crossed and self-fertilised plants raised from the seeds + thus obtained, produced flower-stems in number as 100 to 47, and in + average height as 100 to 70. Therefore the cross between these two plants + was highly beneficial; but how could their sexual elements have been + differentiated by exposure to different conditions? If the progenitors of + the two plants had lived on the same spot during the last score of + generations, and had never been crossed with any plant beyond the distance + of a few feet, in all probability their offspring would have been reduced + to the same state as some of the plants in my experiments,—such as + the intercrossed plants of the ninth generation of Ipomoea,—or the + self-fertilised plants of the eighth generation of Mimulus,—or the + offspring from flowers on the same plant,—and in this case a cross + between the two plants of Digitalis would have done no good. But seeds are + often widely dispersed by natural means, and one of the above two plants + or one of their ancestors may have come from a distance, from a more shady + or sunny, dry or moist place, or from a different kind of soil containing + other organic or inorganic matter. We know from the admirable researches + of Messrs. Lawes and Gilbert that different plants require and consume + very different amounts of inorganic matter. (12/10. ‘Journal of the Royal + Agricultural Society of England’ volume 24 part 1.) But the amount in the + soil would probably not make so great a difference to the several + individuals of any particular species as might at first be expected; for + the surrounding species with different requirements would tend, from + existing in greater or lesser numbers, to keep each species in a sort of + equilibrium, with respect to what it could obtain from the soil. So it + would be even with respect to moisture during dry seasons; and how + powerful is the influence of a little more or less moisture in the soil on + the presence and distribution of plants, is often well shown in old + pasture fields which still retain traces of former ridges and furrows. + Nevertheless, as the proportional numbers of the surrounding plants in two + neighbouring places is rarely exactly the same, the individuals of the + same species will be subjected to somewhat different conditions with + respect to what they can absorb from the soil. It is surprising how the + free growth of one set of plants affects others growing mingled with them; + I allowed the plants on rather more than a square yard of turf which had + been closely mown for several years, to grow up; and nine species out of + twenty were thus exterminated; but whether this was altogether due to the + kinds which grew up robbing the others of nutriment, I do not know. + </p> + <p> + Seeds often lie dormant for several years in the ground, and germinate + when brought near the surface by any means, as by burrowing animals. They + would probably be affected by the mere circumstance of having long lain + dormant; for gardeners believe that the production of double flowers and + of fruit is thus influenced. Seeds, moreover, which were matured during + different seasons, will have been subjected during the whole course of + their development to different degrees of heat and moisture. + </p> + <p> + It was shown in the last chapter that pollen is often carried by insects + to a considerable distance from plant to plant. Therefore one of the + parents or ancestors of our two plants of Digitalis may have been crossed + by a distant plant growing under somewhat different conditions. Plants + thus crossed often produce an unusually large number of seeds; a striking + instance of this fact is afforded by the Bignonia, previously mentioned, + which was fertilised by Fritz Muller with pollen from some adjoining + plants and set hardly any seed, but when fertilised with pollen from a + distant plant, was highly fertile. Seedlings from a cross of this kind + grow with great vigour, and transmit their vigour to their descendants. + These, therefore, in the struggle for life, will generally beat and + exterminate the seedlings from plants which have long grown near together + under the same conditions, and will thus tend to spread. + </p> + <p> + When two varieties which present well-marked differences are crossed, + their descendants in the later generations differ greatly from one another + in external characters; and this is due to the augmentation or + obliteration of some of these characters, and to the reappearance of + former ones through reversion; and so it will be, as we may feel almost + sure, with any slight differences in the constitution of their sexual + elements. Anyhow, my experiments indicate that crossing plants which have + been long subjected to almost though not quite the same conditions, is the + most powerful of all the means for retaining some degree of + differentiation in the sexual elements, as shown by the superiority in the + later generations of the intercrossed over the self-fertilised seedlings. + Nevertheless, the continued intercrossing of plants thus treated does tend + to obliterate such differentiation, as may be inferred from the lessened + benefit derived from intercrossing such plants, in comparison with that + from a cross with a fresh stock. It seems probable, as I may add, that + seeds have acquired their endless curious adaptations for wide + dissemination, not only that the seedlings would thus be enabled to find + new and fitting homes, but that the individuals which have been long + subjected to the same conditions should occasionally intercross with a + fresh stock. (12/11. See Professor Hildebrand’s excellent treatise + ‘Verbreitungsmittel der Pflanzen’ 1873.) + </p> + <p> + From the foregoing several considerations we may, I think, conclude that + in the above case of the Digitalis, and even in that of plants which have + grown for thousands of generations in the same district, as must often + have occurred with species having a much restricted range, we are apt to + over-estimate the degree to which the individuals have been subjected to + absolutely the same conditions. There is at least no difficulty in + believing that such plants have been subjected to sufficiently distinct + conditions to differentiate their sexual elements; for we know that a + plant propagated for some generations in another garden in the same + district serves as a fresh stock and has high fertilising powers. The + curious cases of plants which can fertilise and be fertilised by any other + individual of the same species, but are altogether sterile with their own + pollen, become intelligible, if the view here propounded is correct, + namely, that the individuals of the same species growing in a state of + nature near together, have not really been subjected during several + previous generations to quite the same conditions. + </p> + <p> + Some naturalists assume that there is an innate tendency in all beings to + vary and to advance in organisation, independently of external agencies; + and they would, I presume, thus explain the slight differences which + distinguish all the individuals of the same species both in external + characters and in constitution, as well as the greater differences in both + respects between nearly allied varieties. No two individuals can be found + quite alike; thus if we sow a number of seeds from the same capsule under + as nearly as possible the same conditions, they germinate at different + rates and grow more or less vigorously. They resist cold and other + unfavourable conditions differently. They would in all probability, as we + know to be the case with animals of the same species, be somewhat + differently acted on by the same poison, or by the same disease. They have + different powers of transmitting their characters to their offspring; and + many analogous facts could be given. (12/12. Vilmorin as quoted by Verlot + ‘Des Varieties’ pages 32, 38, 39.) Now, if it were true that plants + growing near together in a state of nature had been subjected during many + previous generations to absolutely the same conditions, such differences + as those just specified would be quite inexplicable; but they are to a + certain extent intelligible in accordance with the views just advanced. + </p> + <p> + As most of the plants on which I experimented were grown in my garden or + in pots under glass, a few words must be added on the conditions to which + they were exposed, as well as on the effects of cultivation. When a + species is first brought under culture, it may or may not be subjected to + a change of climate, but it is always grown in ground broken up, and more + or less manured; it is also saved from competition with other plants. The + paramount importance of this latter circumstance is proved by the + multitude of species which flourish and multiply in a garden, but cannot + exist unless they are protected from other plants. When thus saved from + competition they are able to get whatever they require from the soil, + probably often in excess; and they are thus subjected to a great change of + conditions. It is probably in chief part owing to this cause that all + plants with rare exceptions vary after being cultivated for some + generations. The individuals which have already begun to vary will + intercross one with another by the aid of insects; and this accounts for + the extreme diversity of character which many of our long cultivated + plants exhibit. But it should be observed that the result will be largely + determined by the degree of their variability and by the frequency of the + intercrosses; for if a plant varies very little, like most species in a + state of nature, frequent intercrosses tend to give uniformity of + character to it. + </p> + <p> + I have attempted to show that with plants growing naturally in the same + district, except in the unusual case of each individual being surrounded + by exactly the same proportional numbers of other species having certain + powers of absorption, each will be subjected to slightly different + conditions. This does not apply to the individuals of the same species + when cultivated in cleared ground in the same garden. But if their flowers + are visited by insects, they will intercross; and this will give to their + sexual elements during a considerable number of generations a sufficient + amount of differentiation for a cross to be beneficial. Moreover, seeds + are frequently exchanged or procured from other gardens having a different + kind of soil; and the individuals of the same cultivated species will thus + be subjected to a change of conditions. If the flowers are not visited by + our native insects, or very rarely so, as in the case of the common and + sweet pea, and apparently in that of the tobacco when kept in a hothouse, + any differentiation in the sexual elements caused by intercrosses will + tend to disappear. This appears to have occurred with the plants just + mentioned, for they were not benefited by being crossed one with another, + though they were greatly benefited by a cross with a fresh stock. + </p> + <p> + I have been led to the views just advanced with respect to the causes of + the differentiation of the sexual elements and of the variability of our + garden plants, by the results of my various experiments, and more + especially by the four cases in which extremely inconstant species, after + having been self-fertilised and grown under closely similar conditions for + several generations, produced flowers of a uniform and constant tint. + These conditions were nearly the same as those to which plants, growing in + a garden clear of weeds, are subjected, if they are propagated by + self-fertilised seeds on the same spot. The plants in pots were, however, + exposed to less severe fluctuations of climate than those out of doors; + but their conditions, though closely uniform for all the individuals of + the same generation, differed somewhat in the successive generations. Now, + under these circumstances, the sexual elements of the plants which were + intercrossed in each generation retained sufficient differentiation during + several years for their offspring to be superior to the self-fertilised, + but this superiority gradually and manifestly decreased, as was shown by + the difference in the result between a cross with one of the intercrossed + plants and with a fresh stock. These intercrossed plants tended also in a + few cases to become somewhat more uniform in some of their external + characters than they were at first. With respect to the plants which were + self-fertilised in each generation, their sexual elements apparently lost, + after some years, all differentiation, for a cross between them did no + more good than a cross between the flowers on the same plant. But it is a + still more remarkable fact, that although the seedlings of Mimulus, + Ipomoea, Dianthus, and Petunia which were first raised, varied excessively + in the colour of their flowers, their offspring, after being + self-fertilised and grown under uniform conditions for some generations, + bore flowers almost as uniform in tint as those on a natural species. In + one case also the plants themselves became remarkably uniform in height. + </p> + <p> + The conclusion that the advantages of a cross depend altogether on the + differentiation of the sexual elements, harmonises perfectly with the fact + that an occasional and slight change in the conditions of life is + beneficial to all plants and animals. (12/13. I have given sufficient + evidence on this head in my ‘Variation under Domestication’ chapter 18 + volume 2 2nd edition page 127.) But the offspring from a cross between + organisms which have been exposed to different conditions, profit in an + incomparably higher degree than do young or old beings from a mere change + in the conditions. In this latter case we never see anything like the + effect which generally follows from a cross with another individual, + especially from a cross with a fresh stock. This might, perhaps, have been + expected, for the blending together of the sexual elements of two + differentiated beings will affect the whole constitution at a very early + period of life, whilst the organisation is highly flexible. We have, + moreover, reason to believe that changed conditions generally act + differently on the several parts or organs of the same individual (12/14. + See, for instance, Brackenridge ‘Theory of Diathesis’ Edinburgh 1869.); + and if we may further believe that these now slightly differentiated parts + react on one another, the harmony between the beneficial effects on the + individual due to changed conditions, and those due to the interaction of + differentiated sexual elements, becomes still closer. + </p> + <p> + That wonderfully accurate observer, Sprengel, who first showed how + important a part insects play in the fertilisation of flowers, called his + book ‘The Secret of Nature Displayed;’ yet he only occasionally saw that + the object for which so many curious and beautiful adaptations have been + acquired, was the cross-fertilisation of distinct plants; and he knew + nothing of the benefits which the offspring thus receive in growth, + vigour, and fertility. But the veil of secrecy is as yet far from lifted; + nor will it be, until we can say why it is beneficial that the sexual + elements should be differentiated to a certain extent, and why, if the + differentiation be carried still further, injury follows. It is an + extraordinary fact that with many species, flowers fertilised with their + own pollen are either absolutely or in some degree sterile; if fertilised + with pollen from another flower on the same plant, they are sometimes, + though rarely, a little more fertile; if fertilised with pollen from + another individual or variety of the same species, they are fully fertile; + but if with pollen from a distinct species, they are sterile in all + possible degrees, until utter sterility is reached. We thus have a long + series with absolute sterility at the two ends;—at one end due to + the sexual elements not having been sufficiently differentiated, and at + the other end to their having been differentiated in too great a degree, + or in some peculiar manner. + </p> + <p> + The fertilisation of one of the higher plants depends, in the first place, + on the mutual action of the pollen-grains and the stigmatic secretion or + tissues, and afterwards on the mutual action of the contents of the + pollen-grains and ovules. Both actions, judging from the increased + fertility of the parent-plants and from the increased powers of growth in + the offspring, are favoured by some degree of differentiation in the + elements which interact and unite so as to form a new being. Here we have + some analogy with chemical affinity or attraction, which comes into play + only between atoms or molecules of a different nature. As Professor Miller + remarks: “Generally speaking, the greater the difference in the properties + of two bodies, the more intense is their tendency to mutual chemical + action...But between bodies of a similar character the tendency to unite + is feeble.” (12/15. ‘Elements of Chemistry’ 4th edition 1867 part 1 page + 11. Dr. Frankland informs me that similar views with respect to chemical + affinity are generally accepted by chemists.) This latter proposition + accords well with the feeble effects of a plant’s own pollen on the + fertility of the mother-plant and on the growth of the offspring; and the + former proposition accords well with the powerful influence in both ways + of pollen from an individual which has been differentiated by exposure to + changed conditions, or by so-called spontaneous variation. But the analogy + fails when we turn to the negative or weak effects of pollen from one + species on a distinct species; for although some substances which are + extremely dissimilar, for instance, carbon and chlorine, have a very + feeble affinity for each other, yet it cannot be said that the weakness of + the affinity depends in such cases on the extent to which the substances + differ. It is not known why a certain amount of differentiation is + necessary or favourable for the chemical affinity or union of two + substances, any more than for the fertilisation or union of two organisms. + </p> + <p> + Mr. Herbert Spencer has discussed this whole subject at great length, and + after stating that all the forces throughout nature tend towards an + equilibrium, remarks, “that the need of this union of sperm-cell and + germ-ccell is the need for overthrowing this equilibrium and + re-establishing active molecular change in the detached germ—a + result which is probably effected by mixing the slightly-different + physiological units of slightly-different individuals.” (12/16. + ‘Principles of Biology’ volume 1 page 274 1864. In my ‘Origin of Species’ + published in 1859, I spoke of the good effects from slight changes in the + condition of life and from cross-fertilisation, and of the evil effects + from great changes in the conditions and from crossing widely distinct + forms (i.e., species), as a series of facts “connected together by some + common but unknown bond, which is essentially related to the principle of + life.”) But we must not allow this highly generalised view, or the analogy + of chemical affinity, to conceal from us our ignorance. We do not know + what is the nature or degree of the differentiation in the sexual elements + which is favourable for union, and what is injurious for union, as in the + case of distinct species. We cannot say why the individuals of certain + species profit greatly, and others very little by being crossed. There are + some few species which have been self-fertilised for a vast number of + generations, and yet are vigorous enough to compete successfully with a + host of surrounding plants. We can form no conception why the advantage + from a cross is sometimes directed exclusively to the vegetative system, + and sometimes to the reproductive system, but commonly to both. It is + equally inconceivable why some individuals of the same species should be + sterile, whilst others are fully fertile with their own pollen; why a + change of climate should either lessen or increase the sterility of + self-sterile species; and why the individuals of some species should be + even more fertile with pollen from a distinct species than with their own + pollen. And so it is with many other facts, which are so obscure that we + stand in awe before the mystery of life. + </p> + <p> + Under a practical point of view, agriculturists and horticulturists may + learn something from the conclusions at which we have arrived. Firstly, we + see that the injury from the close breeding of animals and from the + self-fertilisation of plants, does not necessarily depend on any tendency + to disease or weakness of constitution common to the related parents, and + only indirectly on their relationship, in so far as they are apt to + resemble each other in all respects, including their sexual nature. And, + secondly, that the advantages of cross-fertilisation depend on the sexual + elements of the parents having become in some degree differentiated by the + exposure of their progenitors to different conditions, or from their + having intercrossed with individuals thus exposed, or, lastly, from what + we call in our ignorance spontaneous variation. He therefore who wishes to + pair closely related animals ought to keep them under conditions as + different as possible. Some few breeders, guided by their keen powers of + observation, have acted on this principle, and have kept stocks of the + same animals at two or more distant and differently situated farms. They + have then coupled the individuals from these farms with excellent results. + (12/17. ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication’ chapter 17 + 2nd edition volume 2 pages 98, 105.) This same plan is also unconsciously + followed whenever the males, reared in one place, are let out for + propagation to breeders in other places. As some kinds of plants suffer + much more from self-fertilisation than do others, so it probably is with + animals from too close interbreeding. The effects of close interbreeding + on animals, judging again from plants, would be deterioration in general + vigour, including fertility, with no necessary loss of excellence of form; + and this seems to be the usual result. + </p> + <p> + It is a common practice with horticulturists to obtain seeds from another + place having a very different soil, so as to avoid raising plants for a + long succession of generations under the same conditions; but with all the + species which freely intercross by aid of insects or the wind, it would be + an incomparably better plan to obtain seeds of the required variety, which + had been raised for some generations under as different conditions as + possible, and sow them in alternate rows with seeds matured in the old + garden. The two stocks would then intercross, with a thorough blending of + their whole organisations, and with no loss of purity to the variety; and + this would yield far more favourable results than a mere exchange of + seeds. We have seen in my experiments how wonderfully the offspring + profited in height, weight, hardiness, and fertility, by crosses of this + kind. For instance, plants of Ipomoea thus crossed were to the + intercrossed plants of the same stock, with which they grew in + competition, as 100 to 78 in height, and as 100 to 51 in fertility; and + plants of Eschscholtzia similarly compared were as 100 to 45 in fertility. + In comparison with self-fertilised plants the results are still more + striking; thus cabbages derived from a cross with a fresh stock were to + the self-fertilised as 100 to 22 in weight. + </p> + <p> + Florists may learn from the four cases which have been fully described, + that they have the power of fixing each fleeting variety of colour, if + they will fertilise the flowers of the desired kind with their own pollen + for half-a-dozen generations, and grow the seedlings under the same + conditions. But a cross with any other individual of the same variety must + be carefully prevented, as each has its own peculiar constitution. After a + dozen generations of self-fertilisation, it is probable that the new + variety would remain constant even if grown under somewhat different + conditions; and there would no longer be any necessity to guard against + intercrosses between the individuals of the same variety. + </p> + <p> + With respect to mankind, my son George has endeavoured to discover by a + statistical investigation whether the marriages of first cousins are at + all injurious, although this is a degree of relationship which would not + be objected to in our domestic animals; and he has come to the conclusion + from his own researches and those of Dr. Mitchell that the evidence as to + any evil thus caused is conflicting, but on the whole points to its being + very small. From the facts given in this volume we may infer that with + mankind the marriages of nearly related persons, some of whose parents and + ancestors had lived under very different conditions, would be much less + injurious than that of persons who had always lived in the same place and + followed the same habits of life. Nor can I see reason to doubt that the + widely different habits of life of men and women in civilised nations, + especially amongst the upper classes, would tend to counterbalance any + evil from marriages between healthy and somewhat closely related persons. + </p> + <p> + Under a theoretical point of view it is some gain to science to know that + numberless structures in hermaphrodite plants, and probably in + hermaphrodite animals, are special adaptations for securing an occasional + cross between two individuals; and that the advantages from such a cross + depend altogether on the beings which are united, or their progenitors, + having had their sexual elements somewhat differentiated, so that the + embryo is benefited in the same manner as is a mature plant or animal by a + slight change in its conditions of life, although in a much higher degree. + </p> + <p> + Another and more important result may be deduced from my observations. + Eggs and seeds are highly serviceable as a means of dissemination, but we + now know that fertile eggs can be produced without the aid of the male. + There are also many other methods by which organisms can be propagated + asexually. Why then have the two sexes been developed, and why do males + exist which cannot themselves produce offspring? The answer lies, as I can + hardly doubt, in the great good which is derived from the fusion of two + somewhat differentiated individuals; and with the exception of the lowest + organisms this is possible only by means of the sexual elements, these + consisting of cells separated from the body, containing the germs of every + part, and capable of being fused completely together. + </p> + <p> + It has been shown in the present volume that the offspring from the union + of two distinct individuals, especially if their progenitors have been + subjected to very different conditions, have an immense advantage in + height, weight, constitutional vigour and fertility over the + self-fertilised offspring from one of the same parents. And this fact is + amply sufficient to account for the development of the sexual elements, + that is, for the genesis of the two sexes. + </p> + <p> + It is a different question why the two sexes are sometimes combined in the + same individual and are sometimes separated. As with many of the lowest + plants and animals the conjugation of two individuals which are either + quite similar or in some degree different, is a common phenomenon, it + seems probable, as remarked in the last chapter, that the sexes were + primordially separate. The individual which receives the contents of the + other, may be called the female; and the other, which is often smaller and + more locomotive, may be called the male; though these sexual names ought + hardly to be applied as long as the whole contents of the two forms are + blended into one. The object gained by the two sexes becoming united in + the same hermaphrodite form probably is to allow of occasional or frequent + self-fertilisation, so as to ensure the propagation of the species, more + especially in the case of organisms affixed for life to the same spot. + There does not seem to be any great difficulty in understanding how an + organism, formed by the conjugation of two individuals which represented + the two incipient sexes, might have given rise by budding first to a + monoecious and then to an hermaphrodite form; and in the case of animals + even without budding to an hermaphrodite form, for the bilateral structure + of animals perhaps indicates that they were aboriginally formed by the + fusion of two individuals. + </p> + <p> + It is a more difficult problem why some plants and apparently all the + higher animals, after becoming hermaphrodites, have since had their sexes + re-separated. This separation has been attributed by some naturalists to + the advantages which follow from a division of physiological labour. The + principle is intelligible when the same organ has to perform at the same + time diverse functions; but it is not obvious why the male and female + glands when placed in different parts of the same compound or simple + individual, should not perform their functions equally well as when placed + in two distinct individuals. In some instances the sexes may have been + re-separated for the sake of preventing too frequent self-fertilisation; + but this explanation does not seem probable, as the same end might have + been gained by other and simpler means, for instance dichogamy. It may be + that the production of the male and female reproductive elements and the + maturation of the ovules was too great a strain and expenditure of vital + force for a single individual to withstand, if endowed with a highly + complex organisation; and that at the same time there was no need for all + the individuals to produce young, and consequently that no injury, on the + contrary, good resulted from half of them, or the males, failing to + produce offspring. + </p> + <p> + There is another subject on which some light is thrown by the facts given + in this volume, namely, hybridisation. It is notorious that when distinct + species of plants are crossed, they produce with the rarest exceptions + fewer seeds than the normal number. This unproductiveness varies in + different species up to sterility so complete that not even an empty + capsule is formed; and all experimentalists have found that it is much + influenced by the conditions to which the crossed species are subjected. + The pollen of each species is strongly prepotent over that of any other + species, so that if a plant’s own pollen is placed on the stigma some time + after foreign pollen has been applied to it, any effect from the latter is + quite obliterated. It is also notorious that not only the parent species, + but the hybrids raised from them are more or less sterile; and that their + pollen is often in a more or less aborted condition. The degree of + sterility of various hybrids does not always strictly correspond with the + degree of difficulty in uniting the parent forms. When hybrids are capable + of breeding inter se, their descendants are more or less sterile, and they + often become still more sterile in the later generations; but then close + interbreeding has hitherto been practised in all such cases. The more + sterile hybrids are sometimes much dwarfed in stature, and have a feeble + constitution. Other facts could be given, but these will suffice for us. + Naturalists formerly attributed all these results to the difference + between species being fundamentally distinct from that between the + varieties of the same species; and this is still the verdict of some + naturalists. + </p> + <p> + The results of my experiments in self-fertilising and cross-fertilising + the individuals or the varieties of the same species, are strikingly + analogous with those just given, though in a reversed manner. With the + majority of species flowers fertilised with their own pollen yield fewer, + sometimes much fewer seeds, than those fertilised with pollen from another + individual or variety. Some self-fertilised flowers are absolutely + sterile; but the degree of their sterility is largely determined by the + conditions to which the parent plants have been exposed, as was well + exemplified in the case of Eschscholtzia and Abutilon. The effects of + pollen from the same plant are obliterated by the prepotent influence of + pollen from another individual or variety, although the latter may have + been placed on the stigma some hours afterwards. The offspring from + self-fertilised flowers are themselves more or less sterile, sometimes + highly sterile, and their pollen is sometimes in an imperfect condition; + but I have not met with any case of complete sterility in self-fertilised + seedlings, as is so common with hybrids. The degree of their sterility + does not correspond with that of the parent-plants when first + self-fertilised. The offspring of self-fertilised plants suffer in + stature, weight, and constitutional vigour more frequently and in a + greater degree than do the hybrid offspring of the greater number of + crossed species. Decreased height is transmitted to the next generation, + but I did not ascertain whether this applies to decreased fertility. + </p> + <p> + I have elsewhere shown that by uniting in various ways dimorphic or + trimorphic heterostyled plants, which belong to the same undoubted + species, we get another series of results exactly parallel with those from + crossing distinct species. (12/18. ‘Journal of the Linnean Society Botany’ + volume 10 1867 page 393.) Plants illegitimately fertilised with pollen + from a distinct plant belonging to the same form, yield fewer, often much + fewer seeds, than they do when legitimately fertilised with pollen from a + plant belonging to a distinct form. They sometimes yield no seed, not even + an empty capsule, like a species fertilised with pollen from a distinct + genus. The degree of sterility is much affected by the conditions to which + the plants have been subjected. (12/19. ‘Journal of the Linnean Society + Botany’ volume 8 1864 page 180.) The pollen from a distinct form is + strongly prepotent over that from the same form, although the former may + have been placed on the stigma many hours afterwards. The offspring from a + union between plants of the same form are more or less sterile, like + hybrids, and have their pollen in a more or less aborted condition; and + some of the seedlings are as barren and as dwarfed as the most barren + hybrid. They also resemble hybrids in several other respects, which need + not here be specified in detail,—such as their sterility not + corresponding in degree with that of the parent plants,—the unequal + sterility of the latter, when reciprocally united,—and the varying + sterility of the seedlings raised from the same seed-capsule. + </p> + <p> + We thus have two grand classes of cases giving results which correspond in + the most striking manner with those which follow from the crossing of + so-called true and distinct species. With respect to the difference + between seedlings raised from cross and self-fertilised flowers, there is + good evidence that this depends altogether on whether the sexual elements + of the parents have been sufficiently differentiated, by exposure to + different conditions or by spontaneous variation. It is probable that + nearly the same conclusion may be extended to heterostyled plants; but + this is not the proper place for discussing the origin of the long-styled, + short-styled and mid-styled forms, which all belong to the same species as + certainly as do the two sexes of the same species. We have therefore no + right to maintain that the sterility of species when first crossed and of + their hybrid offspring, is determined by some cause fundamentally + different from that which determines the sterility of the individuals both + of ordinary and of heterostyled plants when united in various ways. + Nevertheless, I am aware that it will take many years to remove this + prejudice. + </p> + <p> + There is hardly anything more wonderful in nature than the sensitiveness + of the sexual elements to external influences, and the delicacy of their + affinities. We see this in slight changes in the conditions of life being + favourable to the fertility and vigour of the parents, while certain other + and not great changes cause them to be quite sterile without any apparent + injury to their health. We see how sensitive the sexual elements of those + plants must be, which are completely sterile with their own pollen, but + are fertile with that of any other individual of the same species. Such + plants become either more or less self-sterile if subjected to changed + conditions, although the change may be far from great. The ovules of a + heterostyled trimorphic plant are affected very differently by pollen from + the three sets of stamens belonging to the same species. With ordinary + plants the pollen of another variety or merely of another individual of + the same variety is often strongly prepotent over its own pollen, when + both are placed at the same time on the same stigma. In those great + families of plants containing many thousand allied species, the stigma of + each distinguishes with unerring certainty its own pollen from that of + every other species. + </p> + <p> + There can be no doubt that the sterility of distinct species when first + crossed, and of their hybrid offspring, depends exclusively on the nature + or affinities of their sexual elements. We see this in the want of any + close correspondence between the degree of sterility and the amount of + external difference in the species which are crossed; and still more + clearly in the wide difference in the results of crossing reciprocally the + same two species;—that is, when species A is crossed with pollen + from B, and then B is crossed with pollen from A. Bearing in mind what has + just been said on the extreme sensitiveness and delicate affinities of the + reproductive system, why should we feel any surprise at the sexual + elements of those forms, which we call species, having been differentiated + in such a manner that they are incapable or only feebly capable of acting + on one another? We know that species have generally lived under the same + conditions, and have retained their own proper characters, for a much + longer period than varieties. Long-continued domestication eliminates, as + I have shown in my ‘Variation under Domestication,’ the mutual sterility + which distinct species lately taken from a state of nature almost always + exhibit when intercrossed; and we can thus understand the fact that the + most different domestic races of animals are not mutually sterile. But + whether this holds good with cultivated varieties of plants is not known, + though some facts indicate that it does. The elimination of sterility + through long-continued domestication may probably be attributed to the + varying conditions to which our domestic animals have been subjected; and + no doubt it is owing to this same cause that they withstand great and + sudden changes in their conditions of life with far less loss of fertility + than do natural species. From these several considerations it appears + probable that the difference in the affinities of the sexual elements of + distinct species, on which their mutual incapacity for breeding together + depends, is caused by their having been habituated for a very long period + each to its own conditions, and to the sexual elements having thus + acquired firmly fixed affinities. However this may be, with the two great + classes of cases before us, namely, those relating to the + self-fertilisation and cross-fertilisation of the individuals of the same + species, and those relating to the illegitimate and legitimate unions of + heterostyled plants, it is quite unjustifiable to assume that the + sterility of species when first crossed and of their hybrid offspring, + indicates that they differ in some fundamental manner from the varieties + or individuals of the same species. + </p> + <h3> + INDEX. + </h3> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + Abutilon darwinii, self-sterile in Brazil. + moderately self-fertile in England. + fertilised by birds. + + Acacia sphaerocephala. + + Acanthaceae. + + Aconitum napellus. + + Adlumia cirrhosa. + + Adonis aestivalis. + measurements. + relative heights of crossed and self-fertilised plants. + self-fertile. + + Ajuga reptans. + + Allium cepa (blood-red var.) + + Anagallis collina (var. grandiflora). + measurements. + seeds. + + Anderson, J., on the Calceolaria. + removing the corollas. + + Anemone. + + Anemophilous plants. + often diclinous. + + Antirrhinum majus (red var.) + perforated corolla. + —(white var.). + —(peloric var.). + + Apium petroselinum. + result of experiments. + + Argemone ochroleuca. + + Aristolochia. + + Aristotle on bees frequenting flowers of the same species. + + Arum maculatum. + + Bailey, Mr., perforation of corolla. + + Bartonia aurea. + measurements. + result of experiments. + + Bartsia odontites. + + Beal, W.J., sterility of Kalmia latifolia. + on nectar in Ribes aureum. + + Bean, the common. + + Bees distinguish colours. + frequent the flowers of the same species. + guided by coloured corolla. + powers of vision and discrimination. + memory. + unattracted by odour of certain flowers. + industry. + profit by the corolla perforated by humble-bees. + skill in working. + habit. + foresight. + + Bees, humble, recognise varieties as of one species. + colour not the sole guide. + rate of flying. + number of flowers visited. + corolla perforated by. + skill and judgment. + + Belt, Mr., the hairs of Digitalis purpurea. + Phaseolus multiflorus. + not visited by bees in Nicaragua. + humming-birds carrying pollen. + secretion of nectar. + in Acacia sphaerocephalus and passion-flower. + perforation of corolla. + + Bennett, A.W., on Viola tricolor. + structure of Impatiens fulva. + plants flowering in winter. + bees frequenting flowers of same species. + + Bentham, on protection of the stigma in Synaphea. + + Beta vulgaris. + measurements. + crossed not exceeded by self-fertilised. + prepotency of other pollen. + + Bignonia. + + Birds, means of fertilisation. + + Blackley, Mr., on anthers of rye. + pollen carried by wind, experiments with a kite. + + Boraginaceae. + + Borago officinalis. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + partially self-sterile. + + Brackenridge, Mr., organism of animals affected by temperature and food. + different effect of changed conditions. + + Brassica oleracea. + measurements. + weight. + remarks on experiments. + superiority of crossed. + period of flowering. + seeds. + self-fertile. + —napus. + —rapa. + + Brisout, M., insects frequenting flowers of same species. + + Broom. + + Brugmansia. + humming-birds boring the flower. + + Bulrush, weight of pollen produced by one plant. + + Bundy, Mr., Ribes perforated by bees. + + Butschli, O., sexual relations. + + Cabbage. + affected by pollen of purple bastard. + prepotency of other pollen. + —, Ragged Jack. + + Calceolaria. + + Calluna vulgaris. + + Campanula carpathica. + + Campanulaceae. + + Candolle, A. de, on ascending a mountain the flowers of the same species + disappear abruptly. + + Canna warscewiczi. + result of crossed and self-fertilised. + period of flowering. + seeds. + highly self-fertile. + + Cannaceae. + + Carduus arctioides. + + Carnation. + + Carriere, relative period of the maturity of the sexual elements on same + flower. + + Caryophyllaceae. + + Caspary, Professor, on Corydalis cava. + Nymphaeaceae. + Euryale ferox. + + Cecropia, food-bodies of. + + Centradenia floribunda. + + Cereals, grains of. + + Cheeseman, Mr., on Orchids in New Zealand. + + Chenopodiaceae. + + Cineraria. + + Clarkia elegans. + measurements. + early flowering of self-fertilised. + seeds. + + Cleistogene flowers. + + Coe, Mr., crossing Phaseolus vulgaris. + + Colgate, R., red clover never sucked by hive-bees in New Zealand. + + Colour, uniform, of flowers on plants self-fertilised and grown under + similar conditions for several generations. + + Colours of flowers attractive to insects. + not the sole guide to bees. + + Compositae. + + Coniferae. + + Convolvulus major. + — tricolor. + + Corolla, removal of. + perforation by bees. + + Coronilla. + + Corydalis cava. + — halleri. + — intermedia. + — lutea. + — ochroleuca. + — solida. + + Corylus avellana. + + Cowslip. + + Crinum. + + Crossed plants, greater constitutional vigour of. + + Cross-fertilisation. + see Fertilisation. + + Crossing flowers on same plant, effects of. + + Cruciferae. + + Cruger, Dr., secretion of sweet fluid in Marcgraviaceae. + + Cuphea purpurea. + + Cycadiae. + + Cyclamen persicum. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + self-sterile. + — repandum. + + Cytisus laburnum. + + Dandelion, number of pollen grains. + + Darwin, C., self-fertilisation in Pisum sativum. + sexual affinities. + on Primula. + bud variation. + constitutional vigour from cross parentage in common pea. + hybrids of Gladiolus and Cistus. + Phaseolus multiflorus. + nectar in Orchids. + on cross-fertilisation. + inheritance of acquired modifications. + change in the conditions of life beneficial to plants and animals. + + Darwin, F., structure of Phaseolus multiflorus. + Pteris aquilina. + perforation of Lathyrus sylvestris. + + Darwin, G., on marriages with first cousins. + + Decaisne on Delphinium consolida. + + De Candolle, nectar as an excretion. + + Delphinium consolida. + measurements. + seeds. + partially sterile. + corolla removed. + + Delpino, Professor, Viola tricolor. + Phaseolus multiflorus. + intercrossing of sweet-pea. + Lobelia ramosa. + structure of the Cannaceae. + wind and water carrying pollen. + Juglans regia. + anemophilous plants. + fertilisation of Plantago. + excretion of nectar. + secretion of nectar to defend the plant. + anemophilous and entomophilous plants. + dioecious plants. + + Denny, Pelargonium zonale. + + Diagram showing mean height of Ipomoea purpurea. + + Dianthus caryophyllus. + crossed and self-fertilised. + measurements. + cross with fresh stock. + weight of seed. + colour of flowers. + remarks on experiments. + early flowering of crossed. + uniform colour of self-fertilised. + seeds. + few capsules. + + Dickie, Dr., self-fertilisation in Cannaceae. + + Dictamnus fraxinella. + + Digitalis purpurea. + measurements. + effects of intercrossing. + superiority of crossed. + self-sterile. + + Dipsaceae. + + Dobbs, bees frequenting flowers of same species. + + Dodel, Dr. A., sexual reproduction. + + Duhamel on Raphanus sativus. + + Dunal, nectar as an excretion. + + Dyer, Mr., on Lobelia ramosa. + on Cineraria. + + Earley, W., self-fertilisation of Lathyrus odoratus. + + Eaton, Reverend A.E., on Pringlea. + + Engelmann, development of sexual forms. + + Engler, Dr., on dichogamous Saxifraga. + + Entomophilous plants. + + Epipactis latifolia, attractive only to wasps. + + Erica tetralix. + perforated corolla. + + Erythrina. + + Eschscholtzia californica. + measurements. + plants raised from Brazilian seed. + weight. + seeds. + experiments on. + superiority of self-fertilised over crossed. + early flowering. + artificially self-fertilised. + pollen from other flowers more effective. + self-sterile in Brazil. + + Euphrasia officinalis. + + Euryale amazonica. + — ferox. + + Fabricius on Aristolochia. + + Fagopyrum esculentum. + early flowering of crossed plant. + + Faivre, Professor, self-fertilisation of Cannaceae. + + Farrer, T.H., papilionaceous flowers. + Lupinus luteus. + Phaseolus multiflorus. + Pisum sativum. + cross-fertilisation of Lobelia ramosa. + on Coronilla. + + Fermond, M., Phaseolus multiflorus. + Phaseolus coccineus hybridus. + + Fertilisation, means of. + plants sterile, or partially so without insect-aid. + plants fertile without insect-aid. + means of cross-fertilisation. + humming-birds. + Australian flowers fertilised by honey-sucking birds. + in New Zealand by the Anthornis melanura. + attraction of bright colours. + of odours. + flowers adapted to certain kinds of insects. + large amount of pollen-grains. + transport of pollen by insects. + structure and conspicuousness of flowers. + pollen from a distinct plant. + prepotent pollen. + + Fertility, heights and weights, relative, of plants crossed by a fresh + stock, self-fertilised, or intercrossed (Table 7/C). + + Fertility of plants as influenced by cross and self-fertilisation (Table + 9/D). + relative, of crossed and self-fertilised parents (Table 9/E). + innate, from a cross with fresh stock (Table 9/F). + relative, of flowers crossed with pollen from a distinct plant and their + own pollen (Table 9/G). + of crossed and self-fertilised flowers. + + Flowering, period of, superiority of crossed over self-fertilised. + + Flowers, white, larger proportion smelling sweetly. + structure and conspicuousness of. + conspicuous and inconspicuous. + papilionaceous. + fertilised with pollen from a distinct plant. + + Forsythia viridissima. + + Foxglove. + Frankland, Dr., chemical affinity. + + Fraxinus ornus. + + Fumaria capreolata. + — officinalis. + + Galium aparine. + + Gallesio, spontaneous crossing of oranges. + + Galton, Mr., Limnanthes douglasii. + report on the tables of measurements. + self-fertilised plants. + superior vigour of crossed seedlings in Lathyrus odoratus. + + Gartner, excess of pollen injurious. + plants fertilising one another at a considerable distance. + Lobelia fulgens. + sterility of Verbascum nigrum. + number of pollen-grains to fertilise Geum urbanum. + experiments with pollen. + + Gentry, Mr., perforation of corolla. + + Geraniaceae. + + Geranium phaeum. + + Gerardia pedicularia. + + Germination, period of, and relative weight of seeds from crossed and + self-fertilised flowers. + + Gesneria pendulina. + measurements. + seeds. + + Gesneriaceae. + + Geum urbanum, number of pollen-grains for fertilisation. + + Glaucium luteum. + + Godron, intercrossing of carrot. + Primula grandiflora affected by pollen of Primula officinalis. + tulips. + + Gould, humming-birds frequenting Impatiens. + + Graminaceae. + + Grant, Mr., bees of different hives visiting different kinds of flowers. + + Gray, Asa, sexual relations of trees in United States. + on sexual reproduction. + + Hallet, Major, on selection of grains of cereals. + + Hassall, Mr., number of pollen-grains in Paeony and Dandelion. + weight of pollen produced by one plant of Bulrush. + + Heartsease. + + Hedychium. + + Hedysarum onobrychis. + + Heights, relative, of crossed and self-fertilised plants (Table 7/A). + + Heights, weights, and fertility, summary. + + Henschel’s experiments with pollen. + + Henslow, Reverend G., cross-fertilisation in Sarothamnus scoparius. + + Herbert on cross-fertilisation. + pollen brought from distant plants. + spontaneous crossing of rhododendrons. + + Hero, descendants of the plant. + its self-fertilisation. + + Heterocentron mexicanum. + + Hibiscus africanus. + measurements. + result of experiments. + early flowering of crossed plant. + number of pollen-grains for fertilisation. + + Hildebrand on pollen of Digitalis purpurea. + Thunbergia alata. + experiments on Eschscholtzia californica. + Viola tricolor. + Lobelia ramosa. + Fagopyrum esculentum. + self-fertilisation of Zea mays. + Corydalis cava. + Hypecoum grandiflorum. + and Hypecoum procumbens. + sterility of Eschscholtzia. + experiments on self-fertilisation. + Corydalis lutea. + spontaneously self-fertilised flowers. + various mechanical structure to check self-fertilisation. + early separation of the sexes. + on Aristolochia. + fertilisation of the Gramineae. + wide dissemination of seeds. + + Hoffmann, Professor H., self-fertilised capsules of Papaver somniferum. + Adonis aestivalis. + spontaneous variability of Phaseolus multiflorus. + self-fertilisation of kidney-bean. + Papaver alpinum. + sterility of Corydalis solida. + Linum usitatissimum. + + Honey-dew. + + Hooker, Dr., Euryale ferox and Victoria regia, each producing several + flowers at once. + on sexual relation of trees in New Zealand. + + Horse-chestnut. + + Humble-bees, see Bees. + + Humboldt, on the grains of cereals. + + Humming-Birds a means of cross-fertilisation. + + Hyacinth. + + Hybrid plants, tendency to revert to their parent forms. + + Hypecoum grandiflorum. + — procumbens. + + Iberis umbellata (var. kermesiana). + measurement. + cross by fresh stocks. + remarks on experiments. + superiority of crossed over self-fertilised seedlings. + early flowering. + number of seeds. + highly self-fertile. + prepotency of other pollen. + — amara. + + Impatiens frequented by humming-birds. + — barbigera. + — fulva. + — noli-me-tangere. + — pallida. + + Inheritance, force of, in plants. + + Insects, means of cross-fertilisation. + attracted by bright colours. + by odours. + by conspicuous flowers. + dark streaks and marks as guides for. + flowers adapted to certain kinds. + + Ipomoea purpurea. + measurements. + flowers on same plant crossed. + cross with fresh stock. + descendants of Hero. + summary of measurements. + diagram showing mean heights. + summary of observations. + of experiments. + superiority of crossed. + early flowering. + effects of intercrossing. + uniform colour of self-fertilised. + seeds. + highly self-fertile. + prepotency of other pollen. + + Iris, secretion of saccharine matter from calyx. + + Isotoma. + + Juglans regia. + + Kalmia latifolia. + + Kerner, on protection of the pollen. + on the single daily flower of Villarsia parnassifolia. + pollen carried by wind. + + Kidney-bean. + + Kitchener, Mr., on the action of the stigma. + on Viola tricolor. + + Knight, A., on the sexual intercourse of plants. + crossing varieties of peas. + sexual reproduction. + + Kohl-rabi, prepotency of pollen. + + Kolreuter on cross-fertilisation. + number of pollen-grains necessary for fertilisation. + sexual affinities of Nicotiana. + Verbascum phoeniceum. + experiments with pollen of Hibiscus vesicarius. + + Kuhn adopts the term cleistogene. + + Kurr, on excretion of nectar. + removal of corolla. + + Labiatae. + + Lactuca sativa. + measurement. + prepotency of other pollen. + + Lamium album. + — purpureum. + + Lathyrus odoratus. + measurements. + remarks on experiments. + period of flowering. + cross-fertilisation. + seeds. + self-fertile. + — grandiflorus. + — nissolia. + — sylvestris, perforation of corolla. + + Lawes and Gilbert, Messrs., consumption of inorganic matter by plants. + + Laxton, Mr., crossing varieties of peas. + + Lecoq, Cyclamen repandum. + on Fumariaceae. + annual plants rarely dioecious. + + Leersia oryzoides. + + Leguminosae. + summary on the. + + Leighton, Reverend W.A., on Phaseolus multiflorus. + Acacia magnifica. + + Leptosiphon androsaceus. + + Leschenaultia formosa. + + Lettuce. + + Lilium auratum. + + Limnanthes douglasii. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + highly self-fertile. + prepotency of other pollen. + + Linaria vulgaris. + seeds. + self-sterile. + — cymbalaria. + + Lindley on Fumariaceae. + + Link, hypopetalous nectary in Chironia decussata. + + Linum grandiflorum. + — usitatissimum. + + Loasaceae. + + Lobelia erinus. + secretion of nectar in sunshine. + experiments with bees. + + Lobelia fulgens. + measurements. + summary of experiments. + early flowering of self-fertilised. + seeds. + sterile unless visited by humble-bees. + — ramosa. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + self-sterile. + — tenuior. + + Loiseleur-Deslongchamp, on the grains of cereals. + + Lotus corniculatus. + + Lubbock, Sir J., cross-fertilisation of flowers. + on Viola tricolor. + bees distinguishing colours. + instinct of bees and insects sucking nectar. + + Lupinus luteus. + measurements. + early flowering of self-fertilised. + self-fertile. + prepotency of other pollen. + — pilosus. + self-fertile. + + Lychnis dioica. + + MacNab, Mr., on the shorter or longer stamens of rhododendrons. + + Mahonia aquifolium. + — repens. + + Malvaceae. + + Marcgraviaceae. + + Masters, Mr., cross-fertilisation in Pisum sativum. + cabbages affected by pollen at a distance. + + Masters, Dr. Maxwell, on honey-dew. + + Measurements, summary of. + Table 7/A. + Table 7/B. + Table 7/C. + + Medicago lupulina. + + Meehan, Mr., fertilising Petunia violacea by night moth. + + Melastomaceae. + + Melilotus officinalis. + + Mercurialis annua. + + Miller, Professor, on chemical affinity. + + Mimulus luteus, effects of crossing. + crossed and self-fertilised plants. + measurements. + cross with a distinct stock. + intercrossed on same plant. + summary of observations. + of experiments. + superiority of crossed plants. + simultaneous flowering. + effects of intercrossing. + uniform colour of self-fertilised. + seeds. + highly self-fertile. + prepotency of other pollen. + — roseus. + + Miner, Mr., red clover never sucked by hive-bees in the United States. + + Mirabilis, dwarfed plants raised by using too few pollen-grains. + number of grains necessary for fertilisation. + + Mitchell, Dr., on first cousins inter-marrying. + + Monochaetum ensiferum. + + Moore, Mr., on Cinerarias. + + Muller, Fritz, on Posoqueria fragrans. + experiments on hybrid Abutilons and Bignonias. + large number of Orchidaceous genera sterile in their native home, also + Bignonia and Tabernaemontana echinata. + sterility of Eschscholtzia californica. + Abutilon darwinii. + experiments in self-fertilisation. + self-sterile plants. + incapacity of pollen-tubes to penetrate the stigma. + cross-fertilisation by means of birds. + imperfectly developed male and female Termites. + food-bodies in Cecropia. + + Muller, Hermann, fertilisation of flowers by insects. + on Digitalis purpurea. + Calceolaria. + Linaria vulgaris. + Verbascum nigrum. + the common cabbage. + Papaver dubium. + Viola tricolor. + structure of Delphinium consolida. + of Lupinus lutea. + flowers of Pisum sativum. + on Sarothamnus scoparius not secreting nectar. + Apium petroselinum. + Borago officinalis. + red clover visited by hive-bees in Germany. + insects rarely visiting Fumaria officinalis. + comparison of lowland and alpine species. + structure of plants adapted to cross and self-fertilisation. + large conspicuous flowers more frequently visited by insects than small + inconspicuous ones. + Solanum generally unattractive to insects. + Lamium album. + on anemophilous plants. + fertilisation of Plantago. + secretion of nectar. + instinct of bees sucking nectar. + bees frequenting flowers of the same species. + cause of it. + powers of vision and discrimination of bees. + + Muller, Dr. H., hive-bees occasionally perforate the flower of Erica + tetralix. + calyx and corolla of Rhinanthus alecterolophus bored by Bombus + mastrucatus. + + Munro, Mr., some species of Oncidium and Maxillaria sterile with own + pollen. + + Myrtaceae. + + Nageli on odours attracting insects. + sexual relations. + + Natural selection, effect upon self-sterility and self-fertilisation. + + Naudin on number of pollen-grains necessary for fertilisation. + Petunia violacea. + + Nectar regarded as an excretion. + + Nemophila insignis. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed plant. + effects of cross and self-fertilisation. + seeds. + + Nepeta glechoma. + + Nicotiana glutinosa. + — tabacum. + measurements. + cross with fresh stock. + measurements. + summary of experiments. + superiority of crossed plants. + early flowering. + seeds. + experiments on. + self-fertile. + + Nolana prostrata. + measurements. + crossed and self-fertilised plants. + number of capsules and seeds. + self-fertile. + + Nolanaceae. + + Nymphaea. + + Odours emitted by flowers attractive to insects. + + Ogle, Dr., on Digitalis purpurea. + Gesneria. + Phaseolus multiflorus. + perforation of corolla. + case of the Monkshood. + + Onagraceae. + + Onion, prepotency of other pollen. + + Ononis minutissima. + measurements. + seeds. + self-fertile. + + Ophrys apifera. + — muscifera. + + Oranges, spontaneous crossing. + + Orchideae. + excretion of saccharine matter. + + Orchis, fly. + + Origanum vulgare. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed plant. + effects of intercrossing. + + Paeony, number of pollen-grains. + + Papaveraceae. + + Papaver alpinum. + — argemonoides. + — bracteatum. + — dubium. + — orientale. + — rhoeas. + — somniferum. + — vagum. + measurements. + number of capsules. + seeds. + prepotency of other pollen. + + Papillae of the Viola tricolor attractive to insects. + + Parsley. + + Passiflora alata. + — gracilis. + measurements. + crossed and self-fertilised. + seeds. + self-fertile. + + Passifloraceae. + + Pea, common. + + Pelargonium zonale. + measurements. + effects of intercrossing. + almost self-sterile. + + Pentstemon argutus, perforated corolla. + + Petunia violacea. + measurements. + weight of seed. + cross with fresh stock. + relative fertility. + colour. + summary of experiments. + superiority of crossed over self-fertilised. + early flowering. + uniform colour of self-fertilised. + seeds. + self-sterile. + + Phalaris canariensis. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed. + + Phaseolus coccineus. + — multiflorus. + measurement. + partially sterile. + crossed and self-fertilised. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + perforated by humble-bees. + — vulgaris. + self-fertile. + + Pisum sativum. + measurements. + seldom intercross. + summary of experiments. + self-fertile. + + Plants, crossed, greater constitutional vigour. + + Pleroma. + + Polemoniaceae. + + Pollen, relative fertility of flowers crossed from a distinct plant, or + with their own. + difference of results in Nolana prostrata. + crossed and self-fertilised plants, again crossed from a distinct plant + and their own pollen. + sterile with their own. + semi-self-sterile. + loss of. + number of grains in Dandelion, Paeony, and Wistaria sinensis. + number necessary for fertilisation. + transported from flower to flower. + prepotency. + aboriginally the sole attraction to insects. + quantity produced by anemophilous plants. + + Polyanthus, prepotency over cowslip. + + Polygoneae. + + Posoqueria fragrans. + + Potato. + + Poterium sanguisorba. + + Potts, heads of Anthornis melanura covered with pollen. + + Primrose, Chinese. + + Primula elatior. + — grandiflora. + — mollis. + — officinalis. + — scotica. + — sinensis. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed. + — veris (var. officinalis). + measurements. + result of experiments. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + self-fertility. + prepotency of dark red polyanthus. + + Primulaceae. + + Pringlea. + + Proteaceae of Australia. + + Prunus avium. + — laurocerasus. + + Pteris aquilina. + + Radish. + + Ranunculaceae. + + Ranunculus acris. + + Raphanus sativus. + + Reinke, nectar-secreting glands of Prunus avium. + + Reseda lutea. + measurements. + result of experiments. + self-fertile. + — odorata. + measurements. + self-fertilised scarcely exceeded by crossed. + seeds. + want of correspondence between seeds and vigour of offspring. + result of experiments. + sterile and self-fertile. + + Resedaceae. + + Rheum rhaponticum. + + Rhexia glandulosa. + + Rhododendron, spontaneous crossing. + + Rhododendron azaloides. + + Rhubarb. + + Ribes aureum. + + Riley, Mr., pollen carried by wind. + Yucca moth. + + Rodgers, Mr., secretion of nectar in Vanilla. + + Rye, experiment on pollen of. + + Salvia coccinea. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + partially self-sterile. + — glutinosa. + — grahami. + — tenori. + + Sarothamnus scoparius. + measurements. + superiority of crossed seedlings. + seeds. + self-sterile. + + Scabiosa atro-purpurea. + measurements. + + Scarlet-runner. + + Scott, J., Papaver somniferum. + sterility of Verbascum. + Oncidium and Maxillaria. + on Primula scotica and Cortusa matthioli. + + Scrophulariaceae. + + Self-sterile varieties, appearance of. + + Self-fertilisation, mechanical structure to check. + + Self-sterile plants. + wide distribution throughout the vegetable kingdom. + difference in plants. + cause of self-sterility. + affected by changed conditions. + necessity of differentiation in the sexual elements. + + Senecio cruentus. + — heritieri. + — maderensis + — populifolius. + — tussilaginis. + + Sharpe, Messrs., precautions against intercrossing. + + Snow-flake. + + Solanaceae. + + Solanum tuberosum. + + Specularia perfoliata. + — speculum. + measurements. + crossed and self-fertilised. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + self-fertile. + + Spencer, Herbert, chemical affinity. + + Spiranthes autumnalis. + + Sprengel, C.K., fertilisation of flowers by insects. + Viola tricolor. + colours in flowers attract and guide insects. + on Aristolochia. + Aconitum napellus. + importance of insects in fertilising flowers. + + Stachys coccinea. + + Stellaria media. + + Strachey, General, perforated flowers in the Himalaya. + + Strawberry. + + Strelitzia fertilised by the Nectarinideae. + + Structure of plants adapted to cross and self-fertilisation. + + Swale, Mr., garden lupine not visited by bees in New Zealand. + + Sweet-pea. + + Tabernaemontana echinata. + + Tables of measurements of heights, weights, and fertility of plants. + + Termites, imperfectly developed males and females. + + Thunbergia alata. + + Thyme. + + Tinzmann, on Solanum tuberosum. + + Tobacco. + + Transmission of the good effects of a cross to later generations. + + Trees, separated sexes. + + Trifolium arvense. + — incarnatum. + — minus. + — pratense. + — procumbens. + — repens. + + Tropaeolum minus. + measurements. + early flowering of crossed. + seeds. + — tricolor. + seeds. + + Tulips. + + Typha. + + Umbelliferae. + + Urban, Ig., fertilisation of Medicago lupulina. + + Vandellia nummularifolia. + seeds. + self-fertile. + + Vanilla, secretion of nectar. + + Verbascum lychnitis. + — nigrum. + — phoeniceum. + — thapsus. + measurements. + self-fertile. + + Verlot on Convolvulus tricolor. + intercrossing of Nemophila. + of Leptosiphon. + + Veronica agrestis. + — chamaedrys. + — hederaefolia. + + Vicia faba. + — hirsuta. + — sativa. + + Victoria regia. + + Villarsia parnassifolia. + + Vilmorin on transmitting character to offspring. + + Vinca major. + — rosea. + + Viola canina. + — tricolor. + measurements. + superiority of crossed plants. + period of flowering. + effects of cross-fertilisation. + seeds. + partially sterile. + corolla removed. + + Violaceae. + + Viscaria oculata. + measurement. + average height of crossed and self-fertilised. + simultaneous flowering. + seeds. + self-fertile. + + Wallace, Mr., the beaks and faces of brush-tongued lories covered with + pollen. + + Wasps attracted by Epipactis latifolia. + + Weights, relative, of crossed and self-fertilised plants. + and period of germination of seeds. + + Wilder, Mr., fertilisation of flowers with their own pollen. + + Wilson, A.J., superior vigour of crossed seedlings in Brassica + campestris ruta baga. + + Wistaria sinensis. + + Yucca moth. + + Zea mays. + measurements. + difference of height between crossed and self-fertilised. + early flowering of crossed. + self-fertile. + prepotency of other pollen. +</pre> + +<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EFFECTS OF CROSS & SELF-FERTILISATION IN THE VEGETABLE KINGDOM ***</div> +<div style='text-align:left'> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will +be renamed. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright +law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, +so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United +States without permission and without paying copyright +royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part +of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project +Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ +concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, +and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following +the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use +of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for +copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very +easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation +of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project +Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may +do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected +by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark +license, especially commercial redistribution. +</div> + +<div style='margin:0.83em 0; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE<br /> +<span style='font-size:smaller'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE<br /> +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</span> +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project +Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full +Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at +www.gutenberg.org/license. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or +destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your +possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a +Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound +by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person +or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this +agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ +electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the +Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection +of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual +works in the collection are in the public domain in the United +States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the +United States and you are located in the United States, we do not +claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, +displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as +all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope +that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting +free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ +works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the +Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily +comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the +same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when +you share it without charge with others. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are +in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, +check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this +agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, +distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any +other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no +representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any +country other than the United States. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other +immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear +prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work +on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the +phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, +performed, viewed, copied or distributed: +</div> + +<blockquote> + <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> + This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most + other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions + whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms + of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online + at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you + are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws + of the country where you are located before using this eBook. + </div> +</blockquote> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is +derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not +contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the +copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in +the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are +redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project +Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply +either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or +obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ +trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any +additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms +will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works +posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the +beginning of this work. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg™ License. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including +any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access +to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format +other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official +version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website +(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense +to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means +of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain +Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the +full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works +provided that: +</div> + +<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'> + <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> + • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed + to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has + agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project + Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid + within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are + legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty + payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project + Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in + Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg + Literary Archive Foundation.” + </div> + + <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> + • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ + License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all + copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue + all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ + works. + </div> + + <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> + • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of + any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of + receipt of the work. + </div> + + <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> + • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works. + </div> +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project +Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than +are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing +from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of +the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set +forth in Section 3 below. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project +Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ +electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may +contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate +or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or +other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or +cannot be read by your equipment. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right +of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium +with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you +with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in +lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person +or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second +opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If +the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing +without further opportunities to fix the problem. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO +OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of +damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement +violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the +agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or +limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or +unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the +remaining provisions. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in +accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the +production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ +electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, +including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of +the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this +or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or +additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any +Defect you cause. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™ +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of +computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It +exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations +from people in all walks of life. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future +generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see +Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by +U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, +Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up +to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website +and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread +public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND +DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state +visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To +donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate +</div> + +<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project +Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be +freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and +distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of +volunteer support. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in +the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not +necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper +edition. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +Most people start at our website which has the main PG search +facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. +</div> + +<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> +This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. +</div> + +</div> + +</body> +</html> |