diff options
Diffstat (limited to '41280-0.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | 41280-0.txt | 7757 |
1 files changed, 7757 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/41280-0.txt b/41280-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a049d48 --- /dev/null +++ b/41280-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,7757 @@ +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 41280 *** + + CHRISTIANITY + + AND + + MODERN THOUGHT. + + + + + BOSTON: + AMERICAN UNITARIAN ASSOCIATION. + 1873. + + + + + Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1872, by + + THE AMERICAN UNITARIAN ASSOCIATION, + + In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington. + + + + + CAMBRIDGE: + PRESS OF JOHN WILSON AND SON. + + + + +INTRODUCTION. + + +The following discourses were delivered in Boston, at Hollis-Street +Church, on successive Sunday evenings, and repeated at King's Chapel on +Monday afternoons, during the winter of 1871-72, in response to an +invitation of the Executive Committee of the American Unitarian +Association, whose purpose was thus declared in the letter of +invitation:-- + + "It is not proposed that the course shall be a merely popular one, + to awaken the indifferent and interest them in familiar religious + truths; but rather to meet the need of thoughtful people perplexed + amid materialistic and sceptical tendencies of the time. Nor is it + desired simply to retrace in controversial method the beaten paths + of sectarian or theological debate; but rather, in the interest of + a free and enlightened Christianity, to present freshly the + positive affirmations of faith." + +The several discourses were prepared independently, without conference +or concerted plan; and for their statements and opinions the +responsibility rests solely with their respective authors. + + + + +CONTENTS. + + + PAGE + + Introduction v + + Break between Modern Thought and Ancient Faith + and Worship 3 + + By Henry W. Bellows. + + + A True Theology the Basis of Human Progress 35 + + By James Freeman Clarke. + + + The Rise and Decline of the Romish Church 61 + + By Athanase Coquerel, Fils. + + + Selfhood and Sacrifice 101 + + By Orville Dewey. + + + The Relation of Jesus to the Present Age 129 + + By Charles Carroll Everett. + + + The Mythical Element in the New Testament 157 + + By Frederic Henry Hedge. + + + The Place of Mind in Nature and Intuition in Man 179 + + By James Martineau. + + + The Relations of Ethics and Theology 209 + + By Andrew P. Peabody. + + + Christianity: What it is not, and what it is 231 + + By G. Vance Smith. + + + The Aim and Hope of Jesus 273 + + By Oliver Stearns. + + + + +THE BREAK BETWEEN MODERN THOUGHT + +AND + +ANCIENT FAITH AND WORSHIP. + +By HENRY W. BELLOWS. + + +There is evidently a growing disrelish, in an important portion of the +people of our time, for professional religion, technical piety, and +theological faith. These were always unpopular with youth, and people in +the flush of life and spirits; but this was because they called +attention to grave and serious things; and youth, as a rule, does not +like even the shadow of truth and duty to fall too early or too steadily +upon it. Restraint, care, thoughtfulness, it resists as long as it can; +and none who recall their own eager love of pleasure and gayety, in the +spring-time of life, can find much difficulty in understanding or +excusing it. Of course, too, careless, self-indulgent, sensual, and +frivolous people have always disliked the gravity, and the faith and +customs, of people professing religion, and exhibiting special +seriousness. They were a reproach and a painful reminder to them, and +must be partially stripped of their reproving sanctity, by ridicule, +charges of hypocrisy, and hints of contempt. But, all the while this was +going on, the youth and frivolity of previous generations expected the +time to come when they must surrender their carelessness, and be +converted; and even the worldly and scoffing shook in their secret +hearts at the very doctrines and the very piety they caricatured. The +old relations of master and pupil describe almost exactly the feeling +which youth and levity held toward instituted faith and piety, a +generation or two since. The schoolboy, indeed, still thinks himself at +liberty to call his master nick-names, to play tricks upon him, and to +treat with great levity, among his fellow-pupils, all the teaching and +all the rules of the school. But he nevertheless sincerely respects his +teacher; believes in him and in his teachings, and expects to derive an +indispensable benefit from them, in preparing himself for his coming +career. So it was with the religion and piety of our fathers. The people +profoundly respected the creed, the elders in piety, and the eminent +saints in profession and practice, although the young had their jibes +and jests, their resistance to church-going, their laugh at sanctimony; +and the majority of people then, as now, were not fond of the restraints +of piety, or the exercises of devotion. + +But the alienation to which I wish to draw your attention now is +something quite different from the natural opposition of the young to +serious thoughts; or the gay, to grave matters; or those absorbed in the +present, to what belongs to the future; or of those charmed with the use +of their lower or more superficial faculties and feelings, to the +suggestions and demands of their deeper and nobler nature. That the body +should not readily and without a struggle submit to the mind; that +thoughtlessness should not easily be turned into thoughtfulness; that +youth should not readily consent to wear the moral costume of maturity, +or the feelings and habits of riper years; that the active, fresh, +curious creature, who has just got this world with its gay colors in +his eye, should not be much attracted by spiritual visions, and should +find his earthly loves and companions more fascinating than the +communion of saints or the sacred intercourse of prayer,--all this, to +say the least of it, is very explicable, and belongs to all generations, +and hardly discourages the experienced mind, more than the faults and +follies of the nursery the wise mother who has successfully carried many +older children through them all. + +It is quite another kind of antipathy and disrelish which marks our +time. It is not confined to youth, nor traceable to levity and +thoughtlessness. The Church and its creed on one side, the world and its +practical faith on the other, seem now no longer to stand in the +relation of revered teachers and dull or reluctant pupils; of +seriousness, avoided by levity; of authoritative truth, questioned by +bold error; of established and instituted faith, provoking the +criticisms of impatience, caprice, ignorance, or folly. An antagonism +has arisen between them as of oil and water,--a separation which is +neither due to period of life, nor stage of intelligence, nor even to +worth of character; which does not separate youth from maturity, the +thoughtless from the thinking, the bad from the good, but divides the +creeds, observances, and professions of Christians, from a large body of +people who insist that after a certain fashion they are Christians too, +and yet will have little or nothing to do with professions of faith, or +pious pretensions, or religious ways of feeling, talking, or acting. + +Clearly, it would not do any longer to say that the worth and virtue and +influence of society, in this country, could be estimated by the number +of communicants in the churches, by the degree of credit still given to +any of the long-believed theological dogmas, deemed in the last +generation the sheet-anchors of the State. We all know hundreds of +people, who could sign no creed, and give no theological account of +their faith, whom we do not count as necessarily less worthy in the +sight of God or man than many who have no difficulty in saying the whole +Athanasian Creed. Nay, there are some millions of people in this +country, not the least intelligent or useful citizens in all cases, who +never enter a church-door. A generation or two back, you would safely +have pronounced all these absentees to be worldly, careless people, +infidels, atheists, scoffers. Do you expect to find them so now? Some, +of course, but not the majority. Indeed, you would find a great many of +these people supporting churches, to which their families go, and not +themselves; or to which others go, for whom they are glad to provide the +opportunity. They would tell you, if they could discriminate their own +thoughts, something like this: "Public worship and church organizations, +and creeds and catechisms, and sermons and ceremonies, and public +prayers and praises, are doubtless very good things, and very useful up +to a certain stage of intelligence, and for a certain kind of character. +But we have discovered that the real truth and the real virtue of what +people have been misnaming religion is a much larger, freer, and more +interesting thing than churches, creeds, ministers, and saints seem to +think it. Here is this present life, full of occupations and earnest +struggles and great instructions. Here is this planet, not a thousandth +part known, and yet intensely provoking to intelligent curiosity; and +science is now every day taking a fresh and an ever bolder look into it; +and we want our Sundays to follow these things up. That is our idea of +worship. Then, again, the greatest philosophers are now writing out +their freest, finest thoughts about our nature; and, if we go to church, +we are likely to find some fanatical and narrow-minded minister warning +us against reading or heeding what these great men say; and it is a +thousand times fresher and grander and more credible than what he says +himself! Why, the very newspapers, the earnest and well-edited ones, +contain more instruction, more warning, more to interest the thoughtful +mind, than the best sermons; and why should a thinking man, who needs to +keep up with the times, and means to have his own thoughts free, go +where duty or custom makes it common to frown upon inquiry, doubt, and +speculation,--to shut out knowledge and testimony, and stamp a man with +a special type of thinking or professing?" + +For there are, you observe,--in justice to these thoughts,--these two +instructors to choose between in our generation. Here is the Church, +with its ecclesiastical usages and its pious exhortations; its Sunday +school for the children; its devotional meeting in the week, and its +Sunday teaching and worship,--all acknowledged as good for those that +like them, and are willing to accept what people thought or believed was +true a hundred or five hundred years ago; and here is the modern press, +with the wonderful profusion of earnest and able books, cheap and +attractive, and treating boldly all subjects of immediate and of +permanent interest; and here are the reviews, quarterly and monthly, +that now compress into themselves and popularize all that these books +contain, and furnish critical notices of them; and then, again, here are +the newspapers, wonderful in variety and ability, that hint at, suggest, +and bring home all the new and fresh thoughts of the time. And the +marvel is, that most of these books, reviews, papers, are in the +interest of, and seem inspired by, something larger, freer, fresher, +truer, than what the churches and the creeds are urging. Thus church +religion and general culture do not play any longer into each other's +hands. If you believe what the men of science, the philosophers, the +poets and critics, believe, you cannot believe, except in a very general +way, in what the creeds and churches commonly profess. Accordingly, the +professors in college, the physicians, the teachers, the scientists, the +reformers, the politicians, the newspaper men, the reviewers, the +authors, are seldom professing Christians, or even church-goers; and if +they do go to church from motives of interest or example, they are free +enough to confess in private that they do not much believe what they +hear. + +Assuming that this is a tolerably correct account--although doubtless +exaggerated for pictorial effect--of the existing state of things among +the reading and thinking class of this country, what is the real +significance of it? Is it as new as it seems? Is it as threatening to +the cause of religious faith as it seems? Reduced to its most general +terms, is it any thing more or other than this? The faith and worship of +this generation, and the experience and culture of a portion of this +generation, have temporarily fallen out; and, as in all similar +quarrels, there is, for the time, helpless misunderstanding, mutual +jealousy and misrepresentation. The faith and piety of the time +pronounce the culture, the science, the progressive philanthropy, the +politics, the higher education and advanced literature, to be godless +and Christless; and the culture of the age retaliates, perhaps, with +still greater sincerity, in pronouncing the faith and worship of the +time to be superstitious, antiquated, sentimental, and specially fitted +only to people willing to be led by priests and hireling ministers. + +Now, if this were a quarrel between experience and inexperience, between +good and bad, between truth and falsehood, it would be easy to take +sides. But faith and knowledge have both equal rights in humanity. +People who are sincerely in love with knowledge and science and +philosophy are not thereby made enemies of God or man; certainly are not +to be discouraged and abused for their devotion to practical and +scientific truth, their search for facts, their interest in the works of +the Creator, even if they are not possessed of what the church properly +calls faith and piety. And, on the other hand, however shocked +established faith and piety may naturally be by the handling which +religion and its creeds and worship receive from modern inquisitors, +ought the deeper believers to be seriously alarmed for the safety of its +root or its healing leaves, on account of the shaking which the tree of +life is now receiving? However slow science and culture may often show +themselves to be in recognizing the fact, can any reasonable and +impartial mind, acquainted with history or human nature, believe that +faith itself is an inconstant or perishable factor in our nature? prayer +a childish impulse, which clear-seeing manhood must put away? the +conscience, not the representative of a holiness enthroned over the +moral universe, but an artificial organ, which social convenience has +developed, much like the overgrown liver in the Strasburg goose? In +short, who that considers the part that faith and worship have played in +the history of the race, can doubt their essential and permanent place +in human fortunes? The question of _some_ religion, of _some_ worship, +for the people, does not seem debatable. The only alternative among +nations has been a religion in which mystery, awe, and fear prevailed, +clothing themselves in dread and bloody sacrifices, or else a religion +in which more knowledge, more reason, more love, embodied themselves in +a simpler and gentler ritual. The nations have had only a choice--not +always a wholly voluntary one--between terrific superstitions and more +or less reasonable religions. Christianity has prevailed in civilized +nations, since Constantine, by accommodating its theological dogmas and +external ritual to the needs of successive eras; beginning with coarser +and more heathenish symbols, and running itself clearer and more clear, +as the mind and taste and experience of the race have developed +"sweetness and light." But does this make Christianity only a human +growth, and so predict a coming decay, which many seem to think has +already begun? On the contrary, the decisive fact about Christianity is, +that, while its intellectual history is changing, its early records are +in form fixed and permanent, and that its real progress has been +uniformly a return towards its original simplicity. Other faiths +develop. It is we who develop under Christianity, and are slowly changed +unto the original likeness of Christ. Christ's statements, Christ's +character, Christ's words, do not become antiquated. We are not called +upon to explain away, as superstitions of the time, any of the _certain_ +words he said, or thoughts he had, or commandments he left. True, there +are critical embarrassments about the record, and room enough to +question how it was made up; and we cannot always trust the reporters of +that age, or our own. But when we get, as we certainly do get in +hundreds of cases, at Christ's own words; or when we really see--as by a +hundred vistas, through all the _débris_ and rubbish of the age, we may +see--the true person and bearing and spirit of Jesus, we behold, we +recognize, we know, a Being who, transferred to this age, and placed in +the centre of the choicest circle of saints and sages whom culture and +science and wisdom could collect, would bear just the same exalted +relation of superiority to them that he did to the fishermen and +publicans and kings and high-priests and noble women and learned rabbis +of his own day. We should not hesitate, any more than they did, to call +him Master and Lord; to say, "To whom else shall we go? Thou hast the +words of eternal life." + +Those, then, who fear that true culture, that science or philosophy +boldly pushed, that learning and logic impartially applied,--whether in +studying God's method in creation, or his method in revelation,--can +injure permanently faith and piety, or endanger Christianity, as a +whole, must either think the religious wants of man very shallow or very +artificial, or the providence of God very easily baffled, and the +harmony of his word and works very badly matched. If there be in nature +or in man, in earth or in our dust, in chemistry, astronomy, +anthropology; in geology, the language of dead eras; or in language, the +geology of buried races, any thing that disproves the existence and +providence of a living God, the holiness and goodness and +trustworthiness of his character; the moral and religious nature of man, +his accountableness, his immortality; the divine beauty and sinless +superiority of Jesus Christ, and the essential truth of his +religion,--by all means let us know it! Why should we allow ourselves +to be beguiled by fables and false hopes and make-believes? But the +faith of religious experience, the confidence of those who know and love +and have become spiritually intimate with the gospel of Jesus Christ, is +usually such that they would sooner mistrust their senses than their +souls. They have found a moral and spiritual guidance, a food and +medicine in their Christian faith, which enables them calmly to say to +criticism, to science, to culture, "We do not hold our faith, or +practise our worship, by your leave, or at your mercy." Faith leans +first on the spiritual nature of man, and not on demonstrable science. +It would not be faith, if it were only a sharper sight. It is insight, +not sight. It springs from its own root, not primarily from the +intellect. As we love our wives and children with something besides the +judgment, or the logical faculty, so we love God with the heart, and not +with the understanding. We stand erect, with open eyes, when we are +seeking truth; we fall on our knees with closed eyelids, when we are +seeking God! Religion is not the rule of three, but the golden rule; it +is not the major and minor premises and copula of logic, but the sacred +instinct of the soul, which Jesus Christ has satisfied, and guided, and +owned, and directed, in an inestimable way. + +But when faith and worship have taken this true and independent tone, +let them not join the foolish bigots, who think that because faith rests +on other foundations than science, therefore it owes nothing to science +and culture, and can wholly separate its fortunes and future from them. +True, _faith_ and _culture_, religion and science, in spite of their +general and permanent agreement and connection, when they cannot get on +honestly together, had better for the time separate; for they embarrass +each other, and it is in their insulation that they sometimes ripen and +prepare in separate crucible elements that are ultimately to blend in a +finer compound than either ever knew before. Thus faith, driving science +and culture out of her cell, and closing the doors on fact and +observation, wrapt in devotion, has sometimes caught visions of God +through her purely spiritual atmosphere, which sages in their +laboratories have never seen. The great religious inspirations have not +come from scholars, but from seers; from men of soul, not men of sense. +"How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?" said his +contemporaries of Christ. Well, he knew no letters, but he had what +letters never teach,--divine wisdom! He knew God, that end of knowledge; +he knew man, that last of philosophy. Faith therefore often recruits +itself in a temporary divorce from science, just as Romanism profitably +drives her priests into periodical retreats for prayer and exclusive +meditations on God and Christ. It is beautiful to study even those +humble and uninstructed Christian sects, whose simple and implicit faith +is protected, yes, and exalted, by their providential indifference to +science or unacquaintance with speculative difficulties. It is not their +ignorance that kindles their devotion, but it is faith's vitality, which +in certain exceptional natures and times beams and glows most purely, +fed only on its own sacred substance. When you have reached the inner +kernel of a true Moravian, or even a true Catholic heart, and found a +solid core of faith, unsupported by any other evidence than that which +the Scripture described in the words, "Faith is the substance of things +hoped for, the evidence of things not seen," you have gone far towards +fathoming the holiest secret in our nature, the well of living water. +And, on the other hand, how much better, both for faith and science, +that science should, at a time like this, go without religious ends into +physical or metaphysical pursuits, investigate, inquire, test, question, +in absolute independence of theological or spiritual results. It is only +when thus free and bold and uncommitted that her testimony is worth any +thing. Think of Newton, meditating and exploring the solar system, in +the simple love of truth, without let or hindrance from ecclesiastical +intermeddlers, and compare him with Galileo, lifting his telescope under +the malediction of the priesthood of Rome. + +No: let science be as free as light, as brave as sunbeams, as honest as +photography! Encourage her to chronicle her conclusions with fearless +and unreproached fidelity. She will doubtless make many things which +have been long associated with religion look foolish and incredible. But +it is only so religion can shed some husks, and get rid of some +embarrassments. It is, in short, only just such assaults and criticisms +from science and experience that ever induces religion to strain out the +flies from her honey; to dissociate what is accidental in faith from +what is essential and permanent. And, when science and culture have +gathered in the full harvest of this wonderful season of discovery and +speculation, we may expect to find faith stripped of many garments, now +worshipped, which ignorance and fear put upon her for protection and +defence; but really strengthened in substance, by the free movements +allowed her lungs, and the dropping of the useless load upon her back. +Then, too, science and philosophy will again resume their places at the +feet of the master-principle in our nature, until again driven away, by +new disagreements, to return again by the discovery of a finer harmony. + +Self-culture will never supersede worship, more than golden lamps +burning fragrant oils will ever supersede the sun; more than digging and +hoeing and planting will supersede sunshine and rain from heaven. +Self-culture? Yes: by all means, and in any amount, but not as an end. +When people look to ornamental gardening for the crops that are to feed +the famine-smitten world, and not to the pastures and prairies, as they +lie in the light of the common sun, they will look to self-culture for +the characters, the hearts, the souls that glorify God and lift and +bless the world. "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, +and thy neighbor as thyself." That is the irrepealable law of growth. +"Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all other +things shall be added unto you." Worship, faith, duty, devotion to God, +Christ, humanity, to justice, freedom, truth,--these, and not +self-culture, have lifted the race and the world. Learn, acquire, +cultivate, improve, develop yourselves, by art, music, reading, +languages, study, science, experience, but do it all in seeking to know +and love and serve God and man. Seek to know Christ, and you will learn +more, indirectly, than though you sought all knowledge without this +thirst. Seek to know God, and you shall find all science and culture +healthful, sacred, harmonious, satisfying, and devout. + +The break between modern thought and ancient creeds and worship, thus +considered, though serious, and worth the utmost pains to heal, by all +arts that do not conceal or salve over, without curing the wound, is not +permanently discouraging to earnest and well-considered Christian +faith. Nor are all the signs of the times one way. For--after all that +has been said about the restless and dissatisfied condition of the +critical and conscious thought of the time, and the scepticism of the +learned, or the speculative class, or of the new thinkers born of the +physical progress of the age, and the decay of worship in the literary +and artistic, the editorial and poetical circles--it remains to be said, +that, leaving this important and valuable body of people aside,--not +badly employed, and not without personal warrant for their doubts and +withdrawal from positive institutions,--there remains a mighty majority, +on whom the Christian religion and historical faith and the external +church have a vigorous and unyielding hold; whose practical instincts +and grand common-sense and hereditary experience anchor them safely in +positive faith, while the scepticism raves without and blows itself +clear, and passes over. Christianity first addressed itself to common +people, not to avoid criticism, but to secure the attention of the moral +affections and the spiritual powers, instead of the meaner +understanding. It has lived on the heart and conscience and needs and +yearnings of the masses, from and to whom practical wisdom and fixed +institutions and simple faith always come and always return. Common +sense is not the sense that is common, but the sense that is _in_ +common. And popular faith is not the faith of private ignorance massed, +but of that wisdom which alone enables ignorant people to find a basis +for feelings and actions that all feel to be beyond and above their +private ignorance or self-will. The common people were the first to hear +Christ gladly: they will be the last to hear any who deny him. + +It is easy to exaggerate the decline of modern faith, and to misread the +tendencies of the time on which we have been dwelling. Thus, paradox +though it seem, it were just as true to say that more people are +deliberately interested in Christian faith and worship to-day than at +any previous era in the history of our religion, as to asseverate that +more people doubt and regret it than ever before. Both statements are +true; and they are reconciled only by the fact that it is only in this +century that the claims of faith and worship have been popularly +debated, or that the people were expected or allowed to have any +independent opinion about them. The general soil of our humanity is for +the first time surveyed and sown; and it is found that, with more +_wheat_ than ever, there are also more _tares_. With more intelligent +and convinced worshippers, there are more wilful or logical neglecters +of worship; with more genuine believers, more sceptics; with more +religious activity, more worldliness. Without an army in the field, +there will be no deserters; without a common currency of genuine coin, +no counterfeits; without a formidable body of affirmers, few deniers. + +The positive institutions of Christianity decline in one form, to spring +into new life in other and better forms. Doubtless, fourfold more money +is expended to-day upon temples of worship than in what have been +falsely called the ages of faith,--rather the ages of acquiescence. +Religion does not decline as a costly interest of humanity with the +progress of doubt, freedom, intelligence, science, and economic +development. It is a permanent and eternal want of man, and is always +present, either as a vast, overshadowing superstition, or as a more or +less intelligent faith. Nowhere has it a stronger hold on society than +in free America, which false prophets, with their faces to the past, +muttered was about to become its grave. This busy, delving, utilitarian +country, without a past, denied the influence of ruins and the memory of +mythic founders, a land without mystery or poetry,--how could so tender +and venerable a sentiment as reverence live in its garish day? how so +sweet a nymph as Piety kneel in its muddy marts of trade, or chant her +prayers in its monotonous wilderness, ringing with the woodman's axe or +the screeching saw? But now delegates of all the great religious bodies +in the Old World are visiting America, for religious instruction and +inspiration. Nowhere, it is confessed, is there to be found a people so +generally interested in religion, ready to make so great sacrifices for +it, or so deeply convinced that its principles and inspirations are at +the root of all national prosperity. Nowhere do churches and chapels +spring up with such rapidity, and in such numbers; nowhere is the +ministry as well supported, or its ministers as influential members of +society; nowhere do plain men of business and intelligence, I do not say +of science and philosophy, participate so freely in religious worship. +And since all political compulsion has been taken off from the support +of religion, and it has been made purely voluntary, its interests have +received even more care. There is little doubt that the decline of +religious establishments, the decay of priestly authority, the complete +withdrawal of governmental patronage, the discrediting of the principle +of irrational fear, the dispersion of false dogmas, the clearing up of +superstition, the growth of toleration and charity, instead of weakening +true faith or lessening public worship, will greatly increase and +strengthen both. For it is not man's ignorance, weakness, and fears, +that lead him most certainly to Christian worship and faith. There is a +worship and a faith of blindness and dread; but they have no tendency to +develop a moral and spiritual sense of the character of God, or the +character becoming man, or to survive the spread of general intelligence +and mental courage. If thought, if courage of mind, if inquiry and +investigation, if experience and learning and comprehensive grasp, if +light and sound reason, and acquaintance with human nature, tended to +abolish a living God from the heart and faith of man, to disprove the +essential truths of Christianity, or to make life and the human soul +less sacred, aspiring, and religious, the world would be on its rapid +way to atheism. But I maintain that science itself, philosophy and free +inquiry, however divorced from religious institutions and dogmas, were +never so humble, reverential, and Christian as since they partly +emancipated themselves from theological or ecclesiastical censure and +suspicion. For ages science knelt to religion as she went to her +crucible or laboratory, like the sexton passing the altar in a Catholic +cathedral, and with as little thought or feeling as he, simply to avert +censure, while she pursued inquiries she knew would banish the +superstition she pretended to honor. Faith and knowledge were at +opposite poles; religious truth and scientific truth, finally and +permanently amenable to different standards. How dishonoring to religion +was this distrust of light and knowledge! how faithless in God, this +faith in him which could not bear investigation! how compromising to +Christianity, the sort of trust which refuses as blasphemous the +application of all the tests and proofs which are required in the +certification of every other important conviction! Religious faith rests +on the spiritual nature; but its basis is not less real for being +undemonstrable, like the axioms of mathematics. That is not real faith +which dares not investigate the grounds of its own being. It is +irreverent to God, to affirm that he does not allow us to try his ways; +to demand proofs of his existence and righteous government; to ask for +the credentials of his alleged messengers; to doubt until we are +rationally convinced. If the artificial feeling that faith is opposed to +reason; religious truth to universal truth; that belief in unseen things +is less rational or less capable of verification than the radical +beliefs of the senses,--if these prejudices were sound, or not the +reverse of true, the world would be on its inevitable way to universal +infidelity and godless materialism. But is that the tendency of things? +Is it that religion is growing _less_ mystic? or only science more so? +Have not real and affecting mysteries been very much transferred for the +time from theology to philosophy, from the priest to the professor? I +doubt very much whether men of science are not more truly on their knees +than men of superstition, in our days. Never did such candor, such +confessions of baffled insight, such a sense of inscrutable wisdom and +power, such a feeling of awe and dependence, seem to prevail in science +as now, when so many theologians are raising the eyebrow, and seeking to +alarm the world at what they call the atheism of the most truth-loving, +earnest, and noble men. I would sooner have the scepticism--reverent and +honest and fearless--of these solemn and awed inquisitors in the inner +shrines of nature, than the faith of self-bandaged priests, who are +thinking to light the way to heaven with candles on the mid-day altar, +or to keep faith in God alive only by processions in vestments of purple +and gold. + +Nor has Christianity any thing permanently to fear from the disposition +which now so largely prevails, to separate it from its accidents, its +accretions, and its misrepresentations. The days have not long gone by +when men were counted as entitled to little respect, if they did not +wear side-swords and bag-wigs. You recollect how our Benjamin Franklin +surprised, shocked, and then delighted all Europe, by appearing at the +court of France in plain citizen's clothes? Religion, too, has had her +court-dress, and her sounding court-titles, and official robes, and +circuitous ceremonies. The world has felt horror-stricken whenever any +brave and more believing spirit has ventured to ask the meaning of one +of these theological tags and titles. But how much less wholesome is +living water, if drunk out of a leaf, or the palm of one's hand, than if +presented on a salver, in a curiously jewelled flagon, by a priest in +livery? How much has theological ingenuity of statement and systematic +divinity, which it takes the study of a life to understand, added to the +power of the simplicity of Christ as he unfolds himself in the Sermon on +the Mount? Yet, if any one has dared to be as simple as Christ himself +was in his own faith, he has been said to deny the Lord that bought him. +It has been called infidelity, to think Christ meant only just what he +said, and was understood to say, in his simple parables. You must +believe something not less incredible and abstruse than the church +Trinity; something not less contrary to natural justice and common sense +than the church vicarious atonement; something not less cruel and +vindictive than the eternal misery of all who through ignorance, birth, +or accident, or even perversity and pride, do not hear of, or do not +accept, the blood of Christ as their only hope of God's mercy and +forgiveness, or you are no Christian. Now I hold these dogmas themselves +to be unchristian in origin and influence, although held by many +excellent Christian men. I believe that they are the main obstacles with +many honest, brave, and enlightened men in our day, to their interest in +public worship; and that millions repudiate the Church, and +Christianity, which is a different thing, simply because they suppose +her to be responsible for these barnacles upon the sacred ship. It would +be just as reasonable to hold the Hudson River responsible for the filth +the sewers of the city empty into it; or to hold the sun answerable for +the changes in its beams, caused by the colored glass in church-windows. + +Christianity, the Christianity of Christ, is simple, rational, +intelligible, independent of, yet in perfect harmony,--if it be often an +unknown harmony,--with philosophy, ethics, science; true, because from +God, the God of nature as well as grace; true, because the transcript of +self-evident and self-proving principles; true, because guaranteed by +our nature; true, because of universal application, unimpeached by time +or experience. It affirms the being and authority of a righteous, holy, +and all-loving God, whom man can serve and love and worship because he +is made in his image; can know, by studying himself; and to whom man is +directly related by reason, conscience, and affections. It affirms +divine science and worship to consist in obedience to God's laws, +written on man's heart, and for ever urged by God's Spirit. It affirms +the present and persistent penalty, the inevitable consequences, of all +moral and spiritual wrong-doing and disobedience; the present and future +blessedness of well-doing and holiness. It sets forth Jesus Christ as +the Son of God and Son of Man,--appellations that, deeply considered, +really mean the same thing,--the direct messenger, representative, and +plenipotentiary of God,--his perfect moral image. It insists upon men's +putting themselves to school to Christ, honoring, loving, and following +him; forming themselves into classes,--another name for churches,--and +by prayer, meditation, and study of his life, informing their minds and +hearts, and shaping their wills in his likeness, which is the ideal of +humanity. Its clear object is to dignify and ennoble man, by presenting +God as his father; to show him what his nature is capable of, by +exhibiting Christ in the loveliness, sanctity, and power of his awful +yet winning beauty; to make him ashamed of his own sins, and afraid of +sin, by arousing moral sensibility in his heart; safely to fence in his +path by beautiful and sacred customs,--the tender, simple rites of +baptism and communion; the duty of daily prayer, the use of the +Scriptures, and respect for the Lord's Day. + +Here is a Christianity without dogmatic entanglement; plain, direct, +earnest, simple, defensible, intelligible to a child, yet deep enough to +exhaust a life's study. For it is the simplicities of religion that are +the permanent and glorious mysteries that never tire. They draw our +childhood's wonder, our manly reverence, and age's unquenched curiosity +and awe. Do we ever tire of the stars, or the horizon, or the blue sky, +or the dawn, or the sunset, or running water, or natural gems? Do we +ever tire of the thought of a holy, all-wise, all-good Spirit of +spirits, our God and our Father, or of hearing of the reverence and +trust, the obedience and the love, due to him? Do we ever tire of Jesus +Christ, considered as the sinless image, within human limitations, of +God's love and truth and mercy and purity? Do we ever tire of hearing +the wondrous story of his obedient, disinterested, and exalted life and +sacrifice? or of the call to follow his graces and copy his perfections +into our own hearts and lives? Are we ever weary of hearing of the +blessed hope of immortality, with the comfortable expectation of +throwing off the burden of our flesh, and winging our way in spiritual +freedom nearer to God and the light of our Master's face? Who can +exhaust, who can add to, the real force and attraction and fulness of +those truths and promises? Truly received, they grow with every day's +contemplation and use; they fill the soul with an increasing awe and +joy; they prove only less common-place as they are more nearly +approached, more copious as they are more drawn upon, and more sacred as +they are more familiar. + +It is the common, simple, universal truths that are the great, +inexhaustible, powerful, and never-wearying truths. But doubtless it +requires courage, personal conviction, and self-watchfulness, to +maintain personal piety or religious institutions under free and +enlightened conditions, when they are just beginning. When sacramental +mysteries are exploded, when the official sanctity of the ministry is +disowned, when the technical and dogmatic conditions of acceptance with +God are abandoned, when every man's right of private judgment is +confessed, when common sense is invited into the inner court of faith, +when every man is confessed to be a king and a priest in that temple of +God which he finds in his own body and soul, when real, genuine goodness +is owned as the equivalent of religion, then it is evident that the +support of religious institutions, of public worship, of the church and +the ordinances, must appeal to something besides the ignorance, the +fears, the superstitions, the traditions of the Christian world. They +must fall back on the practical convictions men entertain of their +intrinsic importance. They must commend themselves to the sober, plain, +and rational judgment of men of courage, reflection, and observation. +They fall into the same category with a government based not on the +divine right of kings, or the usages of past generations, the artificial +distinctions of ranks and classes, owing fealty each to that which is +socially above itself, but resting on the consent of the governed, and +deriving its authority and its support from the sense of its usefulness +and necessity. We have not yet achieved fully, in this country, the +passage of the people over from the Old World status of _subjects_ to +the New World status of _citizens_. We are in the midst of the glorious +struggle for a State, a national government, which rests securely on the +love and service of hearts that have created it, and maintain and defend +it on purely rational and intelligible grounds. It is so new, so +advanced, so sublime an undertaking, that we often falter and faint, as +if man were not good enough, nor reasonable enough, to be entitled to +such a government. We often doubt if we can bear the dilution which the +public virtue and good sense in our native community suffers from the +flood of ignorance and political superstition coming with emigrants from +other and coarser states of society and civil organizations. We are not +half alive to the glory and grandeur of the experiment of free political +institutions, and do not press with the zeal we ought the general +education, the political training, the moral discipline, which can alone +save the State, when it has no foundation but the good-will, the +respect, and the practical valuation of the people. But is the State or +the nation ever so truly divine as when it is owned as the voice of God, +calling all the people to maintain equal justice, to recognize universal +interests, to embody Christian ethics in public law? And despite our +local mortifications and occasional misgivings, what nation is now so +strong and firm, what government so confident and so promising, as our +own? What but freedom, fidelity to rational principles and ideal +justice, give it this strength? What is it, on the other hand, but +traditions that represent the ignorance and accidents and injustice of +former ages,--what is it but authority usurped and then consecrated, +social superstitions hardened into political creeds,--that is now +proving the weakness and peril of European nationalities, and imperial +or monarchical governments? Knowledge, science, literature, progress, +truth, liberty, become sooner or later the enemies of all governments, +and all social institutions, not founded in abstract justice and equal +rights. Yet how fearful the transition! Who can contemplate the downfall +of the French empire, and then look at the architects of the new +republic, working in the crude material of a priest-ridden or unschooled +populace, without dismay? Yet the process is inevitable. Democratic +ideas are abroad: they are in the air. They corrode all the base metal +they touch; and thrones and titles, and legalized classes, and +exceptional prerogatives, are predestined to a rapid disintegration. How +blessed the nation that has transferred its political homage from +traditions to principles; from men or families, to rights and duties; +from a compromise with ancient inequality and wrong, to an affirmation +of universal justice and right! Yet never had a people so grave and so +constant and so serious duties as we have. And there is nothing in our +principles or government that _must_ save our country, in spite of the +failure of political virtue, intelligence, and devotion, in our private +citizens. God has buried many republics, because the people were +unworthy of them. Their failure was no disproof of the principle +involved, but only an evidence that the people fell wholly below their +privileges and ideas. America may add another to this list of failures, +but can do nothing to discredit the truth and glory and final triumph of +the democratic idea. I do not believe we shall fail; on the contrary, I +have an increasing faith in the sense and virtue and ability of the +people of this country. But the success of American political +institutions depends very much on the success of the Christian and +religious institutions that match them, and are alone adapted to them. +We cannot long guarantee religious institutions, in a country of free +schools, public lyceums, unlicensed newspapers, unimpeded inquiry, and +absolute religious equality, if they do not rest on grounds of reason +and experience and sober truth. Mere authority, mere ecclesiasticism, +mere sacred usages, mere mystery, or mere dogmatism, will not long +protect the creeds and formularies of the church. They are undergoing a +species of dry-rot, like to that which the rafters of my own church +lately suffered from the confinement and unventilated bondage in iron +boxes in which their ends had been placed for greater security. They +wanted air and light, and more confidence in their inherent soundness; +and, if they had been permitted it, they would have lasted a hundred +years. It is precisely so with the Christian religion, boxed up in +creeds. It grows musty, worm-eaten, and finally loses its life and hold. +A certain timid and constitutionally religious portion of the community +will cherish any creed or usage which is time-honored; and the less +robust and decisive minds of the time will rally about what is +established and venerable, however out of date, incredible, or +irrational. But it is what is going on in the independent and free mind +of the common people, that should have our most serious regard. What is +the faith of the fairly educated young men and women who are now +springing up in America? Certainly, it is not, in the more gifted or the +most thoughtful part of it, in sympathy with any form of sacramental or +dogmatic Christianity. It is not Trinitarian; it is not biblical; it is +not technical. It is hardly Christian! It is bold, independent, +inquisitive, questioning every thing, and resolute in its rights of +opinion. It is alienated from church and worship to a great degree. It +suspects the importance of religious institutions, and reads and thinks +and worships in books of poetry and philosophy. A timid heart might +easily grow alarmed at the symptoms, and think that irreligion, and +decay of worship and fellowship in the Christian Church, were upon us. +But sad and discouraging as the present symptoms are to many, I see more +to hope than fear in these tendencies. They are a rebuke to formal and +technical theology,--to mere ecclesiasticism, to outworn ways. They are +bringing a violent assault upon the hard crust of a stifling belief, of +which the world must get rid before the gospel of Christ can emerge, and +be received in its primitive simplicity. It is the only way in which +faith is ever purified,--by doubt and denial. The gospel requires a new +statement. It must come out of its ecclesiastical bulwarks. It must +abandon its claim to any other kind of judgment than all other truth +claims and allows. It must place itself by the side of science, +experience, and philosophy, and defy their tests. It must invite the +most rigid investigation. It must claim its foundations in eternal +truth. It must prove its efficiency, not with the weak, but the strong; +not with the ignorant, but the learned; not with the bound, but the +free. And then it will recover its lost ground, and take a stronger and +diviner position than it ever had before. + +This is the work that Liberal Christianity has in hand; a difficult, +slow, and often discouraging work, but one that is intensely patriotic, +intensely practical, intensely necessary. That which was the mere +fortress into which the enlightened and free-minded people of +Massachusetts fled for refuge from ecclesiastical tyranny, a +half-century ago,--Unitarianism,--is now become a recognized crusade for +religious liberty for the American people. The liberty is coming fast +enough, and surely enough; but will the worship, will the Christian +seriousness, will the fellowship of faith, will the piety that gives +aromatic beauty as well as health to the soul, come with it? If it were +not to come, liberty would be only license and secularity and +worldliness. Every firm, well-ordered, earnest and religious +congregation of the liberal faith; exhibiting stableness, order, +solemnity; doing religious work among the poor, and cultivating piety in +its own youth; making sacrifices to its own ideas, and upholding its own +worship,--is an argument of the most solid kind, an example of +contagious power, an encouragement of priceless cheer, for those who +think that Christian liberty necessarily leads to license and decay of +worship; or that Christ is less revered and loved and trusted when he is +accepted in the derived and dependent character he claimed,--the only +tenable, rational, possible character in which a century hence he can be +received by any unsuperstitious persons. We have a sacred privilege, a +glorious opportunity. We only need to show ourselves warm, earnest, +united, attached to worship, fruitful in piety, devoted to good works, +zealous for God's glory and man's redemption, sincere, humble, yet +rational and free followers of Christ, to win an immense victory for the +gospel in this inquiring and doubting age. I have no great _immediate_ +hopes, but hopes beyond expression in the gracious development of +another generation. I bate not a jot of heart or hope that absolute +liberty in religion will favor the growth of piety, as much as political +freedom has favored the growth of order and peace and prosperity. Oh! +not a thousandth part the power of Christian truth and righteousness has +yet been shown in the world. The love of God, the love of man, have only +begun their glorious mission. Christ yet waits for his true throne. +Humanity is just come of age, and, with some wild festivity, is claiming +its heritage. But God is with and over it; and Jesus Christ is its +inspirer and guide. He will not lose his headship. He will be more +followed when less worshipped; more truly loved when less idolized; more +triumphant when more clearly understood! Darkness, wrath, threats, +enchantments, sacraments, prostrations, humiliations of reason, +emotional transports, affectations of belief, belief for its own +sake,--none of these things are truly favorable to Christ's kingdom or +the glory of his gospel. God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. +Christ is the Sun of righteousness. When reason, conscience, affection, +rule the world; when love and justice, and mild and tender views of life +and humanity, of God and Christ, displace the cruel terrors and +superstitions that have survived the social and political meliorations +of the age, we shall begin to see that love is the fulfilling of the +law, and liberty of thought the greatest friend of worship, the finest +result of Christ's coming, and the throne from which he commands the +whole human heart and history. + + + + +A TRUE THEOLOGY THE BASIS + +OF + +HUMAN PROGRESS. + +By JAMES FREEMAN CLARKE. + + +The subject of the present lecture is "A True Theology the Basis of +Human Progress." And, in order to strike the key-note, and to indicate +the object at which I aim, I will read four or five passages from the +New Testament, which describe such a Theology in its spirit and root. + +The Apostle Paul says:[1] "I count not myself to have apprehended: but +this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and +reaching forth unto those things which are before, I press toward the +mark." So he declares himself a Progressive Christian. + +[Footnote 1: Phil. iii. 13.] + +Again he says:[2] "We know in part, and we prophesy [or teach] in part. +But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall +be done away." So he declares that all intellectual statements, his own +included, are relative and provisional. He is here speaking, doubtless, +not of rational insights, but of the insight when elaborated by the +intellect into a statement; not of intuitional knowledge, but that which +comes from reflection. In regard to all such propositions, he would +accept the modern doctrine of the Relativity of Knowledge; thus cutting +up by the roots the poisonous weed of Bigotry. + +[Footnote 2: 1 Cor. xiii. 9, 10.] + +Again: "Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit, in malice +be ye children, but in understanding be men."[3] He thus requires and +authorizes a manly, intelligent Theology. + +[Footnote 3: 1 Cor. xiv. 20.] + +Again: "Who also hath made us able ministers of the New Testament; not +of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit +giveth life."[4] He here rejects the Theology of the letter, including +the doctrine of Literal Inspiration. + +[Footnote 4: 2 Cor. iii. 6.] + +Again: "God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of +love, and of a sound mind."[5] + +[Footnote 5: 2 Tim. i. 7.] + +My Thesis to-night is not a truism; my argument is not unnecessary or +uncalled for. Nothing is more common than to undervalue the importance +of Theology; to regard it as having no bearing on life, no influence on +human progress, no causative power in regard to civilization. Mr. +Buckle, one of the most recent English philosophical historians, +contends that Theology is the result rather than the cause of national +character; that it is merely symptomatic of the condition of a people. +If they are in a good condition, they have a good Theology; if in a bad +condition, a bad one. He even thinks it owing to a mistaken zeal that +Christians try to propagate their religion, because he believes that +savages cannot become Christians. Civilization, Mr. Buckle supposes, +depends greatly upon soil, upon climate, upon food, upon the +trade-winds; but not much upon religious ideas. He says that, in +England, "theological interests have long ceased to be supreme." "The +time for these things has passed by." And this is also a very common +opinion among ourselves. Many reformers have a notion that we have done +with Theology, that we can do without it. Some men of science tell us +that Theology has nothing to do with the advance of civilization, but +that this comes from discovery in the sphere of physical science. But I +believe that the one thing which retards the progress of reform is a +false philosophy concerning God and man, a false view of God's ideas +concerning this world; and that the one thing needful for Human Progress +is a deeper, higher, broader view of God and his ways. And I hope to be +able to show some grounds for this opinion. + +The religious instinct in man is universal. Some individuals and some +races possess more of it, and others less; but the history of mankind +shows that religion in some form is one of the most indestructible +elements of human nature. But whether this religious instinct shall +appear as faith or as fanaticism; whether it shall be a blind enthusiasm +or an intelligent conviction; whether it shall be a tormenting +superstition or a consoling peace; whether it shall lead to cruel +persecutions or to heavenly benevolence; all this, and more, depends on +Theology. Religion is a blind instinct: the ideas of God, man, duty, +destiny, which determine its development, constitute Theology. + +The same law holds concerning Conscience and Ethics. Conscience in the +form of a moral instinct is universal in man. In every human breast +there is a conviction that something is right and something wrong; but +what that right and wrong is depends on Ethics. In every language of +man, there are words which imply ought and ought not, duty, +responsibility, merit, and guilt. But what men believe they ought to do, +or ought not to do,--that depends on the education of their conscience; +that is, on their Ethics. + +Conscience, like religion, is man's strength, and his weakness. +Conscience makes cowards of us all; but it is the strong-siding champion +which makes heroes of us all. Savages are cruel, pirates are cruel; but +they cannot be as cruel as a good man, with a misguided conscience. The +most savage heart has some touch of human kindness left in it, which +nothing can quite conquer,--nothing but conscience. That can make man as +hard as Alpine rock, as cold as Greenland ice. The torture-rooms and +_autos da fe_ of the Inquisition surpass the cruelties of the North +American Indian. The cruelties of instinct are faint compared with the +cruelties of conscience. Now what guides conscience to good or to evil? +Theology, in the form of Ethics, is the guide of conscience. For, as +soon as man believes in a God, he believes in the authority of his God +to direct and control his actions. Whatever his God tells him to do must +be right for him to do. Therefore religion in its inward form is either +a debasing and tormenting superstition or a glad faith, according to the +Theology with which it is associated. And religion, in its outward form, +is either an impure and cruel despotism or an elevating morality, +according to the idea of God and Duty which guide it; that is, according +to its associated Theology. + +Some persons, like Lucretius, seeing the evils of Superstition, Bigotry, +and Fanaticism, and perceiving that these have their root in religion, +have endeavored to uproot religion itself. But could this be effected, +which is impossible, it would be like wishing to get rid of the +atmosphere, because it is sometimes subject to tempests, and sometimes +infected with malaria. Religion is the atmosphere of the soul, necessary +to the healthful action of its life, to be purified, but not renounced. + +Every one has a Theology, who has even a vague idea of a God; and every +one has this who has an idea of something higher and better than +himself, higher and better than any of his fellow-men. The Atheist +therefore may have a God, though he does not call him so. For God is not +a word, not a sound: he is the Infinite Reality which we see, more or +less dimly, more or less truly, rising above us, and above all our race. +The nature of this ideal determines for each of us what we believe to be +right or wrong; and so it is that our Theology rules our conscience, and +that our conscience determines with more or less supremacy the tendency +and stress of our life. + +No one can look at the History of the Human Race without seeing what an +immense influence religion has had in human affairs. Every race or +nation which has left its mark on Human Progress has itself been under +the commanding control of some great religion. The ancient civilization +of India was penetrated to the core by the institutions of Brahmanism; +the grand development of Egyptian knowledge was guided by its +priesthood; the culture of China has been the meek disciple of Confucius +for two thousand years. Whenever any nation emerges out of darkness into +light,--Assyria, Persia, Greece, or Rome,--it comes guided and inspired +by some mighty religion. The testimony of History is that religion is +the most potent of all the powers which move and govern human action. + +Such is the story of the past. How is it at the present time? Has +mankind outgrown the influence of religion to-day? Has the spread of +knowledge, the advance of science, the development of literature, art, +culture, weakened its power in Christendom? Never was there so much of +time, thought, effort, wealth, consecrated to the Christian Church as +there is now. Both branches of that Church, the Catholic and Protestant, +are probably stronger to-day than they ever were before. Some few +persons can live apart from religious institutions; but mankind cannot +dispense with religion, and they need it organized into a Church or +Churches. + +Religion is a great power, and will remain so. But what is to determine +the character of this power? It may impede progress or advance it; it +may encourage thought or repress it; it may diffuse knowledge or limit +it; it may make men free or hold them as slaves; it may be a generous, +manly, free, and moral religion or a narrow, bigoted, intolerant, +fanatical, sectarian, persecuting superstition. It has been both: it is +both to-day. What is to decide which it shall be? I answer, its +Theology; the views it holds concerning God, man, duty, immortality, the +way and the means of salvation. Religion is an immense power: how that +power is to be directed depends on Theology. + +Proceeding then with my theme, I shall endeavor to show how false ideas +in Theology tend to check the progress of humanity, and afterward how +true ideas always carry mankind onward along an ascending path of +improvement. + +But first let me say that my criticism is of ideas, not of sects, +churches, nor individuals. By a true Theology, I mean neither a +Unitarian nor a Trinitarian Theology, neither a Catholic nor a +Protestant Theology. I do not mean Calvinism nor Arminianism. I have +nothing to say concerning these distinctions, however important they +may be; and I, for one, consider them important. But I refer to a +distinction more important still, lying back of these distinctions, +lying beneath them; a difference not of opinions so much as of ideas and +spirit. + +By a true Theology, I mean a manly Theology, as opposed to a childish +one; a free, as opposed to a servile one; a generous, as opposed to a +selfish one; a reasonable and intelligent Theology, as opposed to a +superstitious one. + +By a true Theology, I mean one which regards God as a father, and man as +a brother; which looks upon this life as a preparation for a higher; +which believes that God gives us freedom, inspires our reason, and is +the author of whatever is generous, self-forgetting, and noble. I find +something of this Theology in all sects and churches; from the Roman +Catholic at one extreme, to the Universalists and Unitarians, the +Spiritualists and Come-outers, at the other. And the opposite, the false +Theology, dishonorable to God, degrading to man, I find in all sects, +and accompanying all creeds. And if I shall show, as truth compels me to +show, that certain parties and persons are specially exposed to danger +in one or another direction, I wish distinctly to state my belief that +sincere and earnest men continually rise above the contagion of their +position, and live untainted in an atmosphere which may have in it some +special tendency to disease. + +One false idea in Theology, which opposes human progress, is that +Pantheistic view of the Deity, which loses sight of his personality, and +conceives of him as a blind, infinite force, pervading all Nature, and +carrying on the universe, but without intelligence and without love. + +I know indeed that many views have been accused of being Pantheism which +are not. I do not believe in a God outside of the universe. I believe +that he is one "in whom we live, and move, and have our being," one +"from whom, and through whom, and to whom are all things,"--a perpetual +Creator, immanent in his world. But this view is quite consistent with a +belief in his personal being, in his intelligent, conscious, loving +purpose. Without such a belief, hope dies out of the heart; and without +hope mankind loses the energy which creates progress. Unless we have an +intelligent Friend who governs the universe, it will seem to be moving +blindly on toward no divine end; and this thought eats out the courage +of the soul. + +In some poetical natures, as in the case of Shelley, this Pantheism +takes the form of faith in a spirit of beauty, or love, or intellectual +power, pervading all things. In more prosaic minds it becomes a belief +in law, divorced from love. It turns the universe into a machine, worked +by forces whose mutual action unfolds and carries on the magnificent +Cosmos. Often this view comes, by way of a reaction, against an +excessive Personality of Will. When the Christian Church speaks of the +Deity as an Infinite Power outside of the world, who creates it and +carries it on according to some contrivance, of which his own glory is +the end, it is perhaps natural that men should go to the other extreme +and omit person, will, and design from their conception of Deity. But +thus they encounter other and opposite dangers. + +A gospel of mere law is no sufficient gospel. It teaches prudence, but +omits Providence. This utilitarian doctrine, which reduces every thing +to law,--which makes the Deity only a Great Order, not a Father or +Friend,--would soon put a stop to the deepest spring of human progress. +It takes faith and hope out of our life, and substitutes observation, +calculation, and prudence. But the case of Ecclesiastes and of Faust +teaches us what comes from knowledge emptied of faith. He who increases +such knowledge increases sorrow. The unknown, wonderful Father; the +divine, mysterious Infinite; the great supernatural power and beauty +above Nature, and above all,--these alone make life tolerable. Without +this brooding sense of a Divine love, of a Heaven beyond this world, of +a Providence guiding human affairs, men would not long have the heart to +study, because all things would seem to be going nowhere. Without such a +Heavenly Friend to trust, such an immortal progress to hope, all things +would seem to revolve in a circle. Not to believe in something more than +a God of Law is to be without God in the world, is to be without hope. +And hope is the spring of all progress, intellectual progress as well as +all other. Intellect, divorced from faith, at last kills intellect +itself, by destroying its inner motive. It ends in a doctrine of +despair, which cries continually, "What is the use?" and finds no +answer. And so the soul dies the only death the soul can die,--the death +of torpor and inaction. + +Another false idea in Theology, which interferes with human progress, is +that of ecclesiastical authority in matters of faith and practice. When +the Church comes between the soul and God, and seeks to be its master +rather than its servant, it takes from it that direct responsibility to +God, which is one of the strongest motives for human effort. I know that +this has always been done from a sincere desire, at any rate in the +beginning, to save men from apparent dangers. The Church has assumed +authority, in order to do good with it. It has commanded men not to +think for themselves, lest they should err. But God has meant that we +should be liable to error, in order that we should learn to avoid it by +increased strength. Therefore Christ said, "Be not called Rabbi; be not +called Masters, and call no man father on earth." His church, and his +apostles, and he himself are here, not to be masters of the soul, but to +be its servants. + +The Roman Catholic Church is a great organization, which has gradually +grown up, during a thousand years, the object of which has been to +educate men in Christian faith and Christian conduct. It has sincerely +endeavored to do this. But, unfortunately, it took a narrow view of +Christian education; supposing that it meant instruction and guidance, +restraint and tuition, but not development. It has magnified its own +authority, in order to produce docility in its pupils. It has not +allowed them freedom of inquiry nor liberty of conscience. It has not +said, like Paul, "Be not children in understanding;" on the contrary, it +has preferred to keep them children, so as to guide them more easily. It +has not said, with Paul, "Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ has +made you free;" for it has come to hate the very name of liberty. What +is the result? You may read it to-day in France, where, as Mr. Coquerel +tells us, that Church has prevented the steady development of free +institutions. It has always supported the principle of authority in the +State, as the natural ally of authority in the Church. There are so few +republicans in France to-day, because the people have been educated by +the Church to blind submission. The priests are not to blame, the people +are not: it is the Roman Catholic Theology which is to blame. That +Theology teaches that the soul is saved by the reception of external +sacraments, and not by vital, independent convictions of truth.[6] + +[Footnote 6: The proof of this may be amply found in the famous +Encyclical and Syllabus of Pius IX., Dec. 8th, 1864. In the Syllabus he +denounces as errors such propositions as the following:-- + +That "every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which +guided by the light of reason, he holds to be true." § 15. + +That "one may well hope, at least, for the eternal salvation of those +who are in no wise in the true Church of Christ." § 17. + +That "the Church has no power to employ force." § 24. + +That "men emigrating to Catholic countries should be permitted the +public exercise of their own several forms of worship." § 78. + +That "the Roman Pontiff can and ought to reconcile and harmonize himself +with progress, with liberalism, and with modern civilization." § 80.] + +Or, if you wish another illustration of the same thing, look at New +York. Why have republican institutions in New York almost proved a +failure? Why were a few robbers able to take possession of the city, and +plunder the citizens? Because they could control the votes of the Irish +Catholics in a mass; because this vast body of voters were unable to +vote independently, or to understand the first duties of a free citizen. +And why was this? Not because the Irish are naturally less intelligent +than the New-Englanders, the English, the Germans. No; but the Roman +Catholic Church, which has had the supreme control over the Irish +conscience and intellect for a thousand years, has chosen to leave them +uneducated. Of course, the Roman Church, if it had pleased to do so, +might long ago have made the Irish nation as enlightened as any in +Europe. But its Theology taught that education might lead them into +heresy, and so take them out of the true Church, and that ignorance _in_ +the Church was infinitely better than any amount of intellectual and +moral culture _out_ of it. The fatal principle of Roman Catholic +Theology--"Out of the true Church there is no salvation"--has been the +ruin of the Irish nation for hundreds of years, and has very nearly +entailed ruin on our own. + +Do you wonder that the priests oppose our school system? If I were a +Roman Catholic priest, I should oppose it too. Should I run the risk of +poisoning my child's body by accepting as a gift a little better food +than that I am able to buy? And shall I risk the vastly greater evil of +poisoning its soul, by allowing it to be tainted with heretical books +and teachers in free schools? The Roman Catholic priest is consistent: +it is the Theology which teaches salvation by sacraments that is to +blame. It is a theology which naturally, logically, necessarily, stands +opposed to human progress. It says, "In order to be children in malice, +you must also be children in understanding." + +When the Protestant Reformation came, it brought with it a manly +Theology. It put the Bible into all men's hands, and asserted for each +the right of private judgment and liberty of conscience. Therefore the +Reformation was the cause of a great forward movement in human affairs. +It awakened the intellect of mankind. Science, literature, +invention,--all were stimulated by it. It ran well, but something +hindered. Its reverence for the Bible was its life; but, unfortunately, +it soon fell into a worship of _the letter_. It taught a doctrine of +verbal inspiration. It forgot the great saying of Paul, "not of the +letter, but the spirit; for the letter killeth." Very soon that saying +was fulfilled. Reverence for the letter of the Bible killed the spirit +of the Bible. That spirit is as free as air. It teaches no creed, it +demands no blind acceptance of any dogma. It declares that where the +spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. But the letter-theology has +opposed nearly all the discoveries of science and all moral reforms with +the words of the Bible. It has set Genesis against geology, and the book +of Psalms against the Copernican system. Because the Book of Genesis +says the heavens and earth were made in six days, the letter-theology +declared that the fossil shells were made in the rocks just as they are, +or were dropped by pilgrims returning from the Holy Land. Because the +book of Psalms said that "God hath established the earth so that it +shall not be moved for ever," the letter-theology denied its daily and +yearly revolution. Because Noah said, "Cursed be Canaan," the +letter-theology defended the slavery of the negro. Because Noah also +said, "He who sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed," the +letter-theology has defended capital punishment as a religious duty. +Because the Jews were commanded to rest on the seventh day, the +letter-theology forbids the Boston Public Library to be open on the +first. Becoming ever more timid and more narrow, it clings to the letter +of the common English translation, and the received text. It even +shrinks from alterations which would give us the true letter of the +Bible, instead of the false one. + +Some years ago the American Bible Society appointed a committee of the +most learned scholars, from all Orthodox denominations, to correct the +text and the translation of our common English Bible, so as to make it +conform to the true Hebrew and Greek text. They were not to make a new +translation, but merely to correct palpable, undoubted errors in the old +one. They did their work; printed their corrected Bible; laid it before +the Bible Society,--_and that Society refused to adopt it_. They had not +the slightest doubt of its superior correctness; but they feared to make +any change, lest others might be called for, and lest the faith of the +community might be disturbed in the integrity of the Scriptures. Jesus +had promised them the Holy Spirit to lead them into all truth, to take +of his truth and show it to them; but they did not believe him. They +preferred to anchor themselves to the words chosen by King James's +translators than to be led by the Spirit into any new truth. So it is +that "the letter killeth." It stands in the way of progress. It keeps us +from trusting in that ever-present Spirit which is ready to inspire us +all to-day, as it inspired prophets and apostles of old. It is an +evidence not of faith, but of unbelief. + +Thus, this false idea in Theology, that inspiration rests in the letter +of a book or a creed rather than in its spirit, is seen to be opposed to +human progress. + +And then there is another Theology which is opposed to human progress. +It is the Theology of Fear. It speaks of hell rather than of heaven; it +seeks to terrify rather than to encourage; it drives men by dread of +danger rather than leads them by hope. Its ruling idea is of stern, +implacable justice; its God is a God of vengeance, who cannot pardon +unless the full penalty of sin has been borne by some victim; whose +mercy ceases at death; who can only forgive sin during our short human +life, not after we have passed into the other world. To assuage his +anger, or appease his justice, there must be devised some scheme of +salvation, or plan of redemption. He cannot forgive of pure, free grace, +and out of his boundless love. + +Now those who hold such a Theology as this will apply its spirit in +human affairs. It will go into penal legislation, into the treatment of +criminals. It will make punishment the chief idea, not reformation. +Jesus taught a boundless compassion, an infinite tenderness toward the +sinful, the weak, the forlorn people of the world. He taught that the +strong are to bear the burdens of the weak, the righteous to help the +wicked, and that we are to overcome evil with good. When this principle +is applied in human affairs, the great plague spots of society will +disappear: intemperance, licentiousness, pauperism, crime, will be cured +radically. Society, purified from these poisons, will go forward to +nobler achievements than have ever yet been dreamed of. But this +principle will not be applied while the fear-theology prevails, and is +thought more of than that of love. The progress of human society depends +on the radical cure of these social evils, not their mere restraint. And +they can only be cured by such a view of the divine holiness and the +divine compassion as is taught by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount and +the Parable of the Prodigal Son; showing the root of crime in sin, and +inspiring a profound faith in God's saving love. + +It may seem to some persons that I go too far in asserting that a true +Theology is at the basis of human progress. They may ascribe human +progress to other causes,--to the advance of knowledge, to scientific +discovery, to such inventions as printing, the steam-engine, the +railroad, and the like. But I believe that spiritual ideas are at the +root of all others. That which one thinks of God, duty, and +immortality,--in short, his Theology,--quickens or deadens his interest +in every thing else. Whatever arouses conscience, faith, and love, also +awakens intellect, invention, science, and art. If there is nothing +above this world or beyond this life; if we came from nothing and are +going nowhere, what interest is there in the world? "Let us eat and +drink, for to-morrow we die." But if the world is full of God,--if we +come from him and are going to him,--then it becomes everywhere +intensely interesting, and we wish to know all about it. Science has +followed always in the steps of religion, and not the reverse. The Vedas +went before Hindoo civilization; the Zend-Avesta led the way to that of +Persia; the oldest monuments of Egypt attest the presence of religious +ideas; the Laws of Moses preceded the reign of Solomon; and that +civilization which joined Greeks, Romans, Goths, Vandals, Franks, and +Saxons in a common civilization, derived its cohesive power from the +life of Him whose idea was that love to man was another form of love to +God. "The very word _humanity_," says Max Müller, "dates from +Christianity." No such idea, and therefore no such term, was found among +men before Christ came. + +But it may be said that these instances are from such obscure epochs +that it is uncertain how far it was religion which acted on +civilization. Let us, then, take one or two instances, concerning which +there is less uncertainty. + +In the deserts, and among the vast plains of the Arabian Peninsula, a +race had slumbered inactive for twenty centuries. Those nomad-Semitic +tribes had wandered to and fro, engaged in perpetual internecine +warfare, fulfilling the prediction concerning Ishmael, "He will be a +wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand +against him." No history, no civilization, no progress, no nationality, +no unity, could be said to exist during that long period among these +tribes. At length a man comes with a religious idea, a living, powerful +conviction. He utters it, whether man will bear or forbear. He proclaims +the unity and spirituality of God in spite of all opposition and +persecution. At last his idea takes hold of the soul of this people. +What is the result? They flame up into a mighty power; they are united +into an irresistible force; they sweep over the world in a few decades +of years; they develop a civilization superior to any other then extant. +Suddenly there springs up in their midst a new art, literature, and +science. Christendom, emasculated by an ecclesiastical and monastic +Theology, went to Islam for freedom of thought, and found its best +culture in the Mohammedan universities of Spain. Bagdad, Cairo, +Damascus, Seville, Cordova, became centres of light to the world. The +German conquerors darkened the regions they overran: the Mohammedans +enlightened them. The caliphs and viziers patronized learning and +endowed colleges, and some of their donations amounted to millions of +dollars. Libraries were collected. That of a single doctor was a load +for four hundred camels. That of Cairo contained a hundred thousand +manuscripts, which were lent as freely as those in the Boston Public +Library. The College Library of Cordova had four hundred thousand. In +these places grammar, logic, jurisprudence, the natural sciences, the +philosophy of Aristotle, were taught to students who flocked to them +from all parts of Christendom. Many of the professors taught from +memory: one man is reported to have been able to repeat three thousand +poems. The Saracens wrote treatises on geography, numismatics, medicine, +chemistry, astronomy, mathematics. Some, like Avicenna, went through the +whole circle of the sciences. The Saracens invented pharmacy, surgery, +chemistry. Geber, in the eighth century, could prepare alcohol, +sulphuric acid, nitric acid, corrosive sublimate, potash, and soda. +Their astronomers measured a degree of the earth's meridian near Bagdad, +and determined its circumference as twenty-four thousand miles. They +found the length of the year, and calculated the obliquity of the +ecliptic. Roger Bacon quotes their treatises on optics. Trigonometry +retains the form given it by the Arabs, and they greatly improved +Algebra. We received from them our numerical characters. We all know the +beauty and permanence of their architecture, and much of our musical +knowledge is derived from them. They also made great progress in +scientific agriculture and horticulture, in mining and the working of +metals, in tanning and dying leather. Damascus blades, morocco, +enamelled steel, the manufacture and use of paper, the use of the +pendulum, the manufacture of cotton, public libraries, a national +police, rhyme in verse, and our arithmetic, all came to us from the +Arabs. + +All this fruitful intellectual life must be traced directly back to the +theological impulse given by Mohammed to the Arab mind; for it can be +derived from no other source. + +It is not quite so easy to define the precise influence on human +progress given by the doctrines of the Reformation; for, before Luther, +these were in the air. But no one can reasonably doubt that the demand +for freedom of conscience and the right of private judgment in religion +has led to liberty of thought, speech, action, in all other directions. +To the war against papal and ecclesiastical authority in concerns of the +soul we owe, how much no one can say, of civil freedom, popular +sovereignty, the emancipation of man, the progress of the human mind. +The theses of Luther were the source of the Declaration of Independence. +And modern science, with the great names of Bacon and Newton, Descartes +and Leibnitz, Goethe and Humboldt, is the legitimate child of Protestant +Theology. + +It is true that printing and maritime discoveries preceded Luther. But +these inventions came from the same ideas which took form in the +Lutheran Reformation. The discovery of printing was a result, no less +than a cause. It came because it was wanted; because men were wishing to +communicate their thoughts more freely and widely than could be done by +writing. If it had been discovered five hundred years before, it would +have fallen dead, a sterile invention, leading to nothing. And so the +steam-engine and the railroad did not come before, because they were not +wanted: as soon as they were wanted they came. That which lies at the +root of all these inventions is the wish of man to communicate easily +and rapidly and widely with his brother-man; in other words, the sense +of human brotherhood. Material civilization, in all its parts and in all +times, grows out of a spiritual root; and only faith leads to sight, +only the things unseen and eternal create those which are seen and +temporal. + +The two Theologies at the present time which stand opposed to each other +here are not Calvinism and Armenianism, not Trinitarianism and +Unitarianism, not Naturalism and Supernaturalism. But they are the +Theology of discouragement and fear on one side, that of courage and +hope on the other. The one thinks men must be driven to God by terror: +the other seeks to attract them by love. The one has no faith in man, +believes him wholly evil, believes sin to be the essential part of him. +The other believes reason a divine light in the soul, and encourages it +to act freely; trusts in his conscience enlightened by truth, and +appeals to it confidently; relies on his heart, and seeks to inspire it +with generous affections and disinterested love. That this Theology of +faith is to triumph over that of fear who can doubt? All the best +thought, the deepest religion, the noblest aspiration of the age, flows +in this direction. Whether our handful of Unitarian Churches is ever to +become a great multitude or not, I do not know; but I am sure that the +spirit which inspired the soul of Channing is to lead the future age, +and make the churches which are to be. It is not now a question of Unity +or Trinity, but something far deeper and much more important. While +endeavoring to settle the logical terms of Christ's divinity and +humanity, we have been led up higher to the sight of the Divine Father +and the Human Brotherhood. Like Saul, the son of Kish, we went out to +seek our father's asses, and have found a kingdom. + +We have recently been told about a Boston Theology. If there is any +thing which deserves to be called a Boston Theology it is this doctrine +of courage and hope. For it is shared by all the leading minds of all +Protestant denominations in this city. Whatever eminent man comes here, +no matter what he was when he came, finds himself, ere long, moving in +this direction. The shackles of tradition and formality fall from his +limbs, his eyes open to a new light; and he also becomes the happy +herald of a new and better day. + +But a better word still, if one is wanted by which to localize these +ideas, would be "The New England Theology." For in every part of New +England, from the beginning; in every one of the multiform sects, whose +little spires and baby-house churches have spotted our barren and rocky +hills, there have never failed men of this true Apostolic succession; +men believing in truth, and brave to utter it; believing that God loves +truth better than falsehood; that he desires no one to tell a lie for +his glory, or to speak words of wind in his behalf. With all our +narrowness, our bigotry, our controversial bitterness, our persecuting +zeal,--of which, God knows, we have had enough in New England,--the +heart of New England has been always free, manly, and rational. Yes: all +the way from Moses Stuart to William Ellery Channing, all along the road +from the lecture-rooms on the hills of Andover to the tribune of +Theodore Parker standing silent in the Music Hall, we have had this same +brave element of a manly Theology. This has been the handful of salt +which has saved New England. Hence it is that from the days of the early +Puritans, men and women, of Harry Vane, Mrs. Hutchinson, and Roger +Williams, who stood up for the rights of the human soul against priestly +tyranny, down through the ministers of the Revolution who went with +their people to the camp of Washington at Cambridge; down to the days of +the Beechers,--there has never failed a man in the New England pulpit to +stand up for justice, freedom, and humanity. From our bare hill-tops New +England men and women have looked up to the sky and seen it not always +nor wholly black with superstitious clouds, but its infinite depths of +blue interpenetrated evermore with the warm living light of a God of +Love. And therefore has New England been the fountain of Progress, the +fruitful parent of Reforms, "the lovely mother of yet more lovely +children." + +I have quoted several striking passages from the Apostle Paul. One +expresses his longing for greater excellence, and declares that he +forgets every thing already attained, and is reaching out for better +things, for more truth and more love. Another passage calls on his +disciples to think for themselves, and be rational Christians, not +children in understanding. A third asserts that he is the minister of +the spirit of the gospel, not its letter; a fourth that his religion is +not one of fear, but of power and love and a sound mind; a fifth says, +Stand fast in freedom, and be liberal Christians; and in other places he +exhorts his brethren not to be narrow, nor bigoted; but to look at every +thing beautiful, lovely, true, and good, no matter where they find it. +But a little while before he said these things Paul himself was one of +the most narrow, and intolerant of men, opposed to progress wholly. What +made this great change in his soul? It was that he had found a true +Theology. He learned from Christ to trust simply in the divine love for +pardon and salvation. He learned that God was the God of Heathen and +Pagans as well as of Jews. He learned that no ritual, ceremony, +sacraments nor forms, but only the sight of God as a Father and Friend, +can really save the soul from its diseases, and fill it with immortal +life. A true Theology was the secret of Paul's immense progress, and of +his wonderful power to awaken and convert others. There are many who +suppose his Theology obscure and severe. But when we penetrate the veil +of Jewish language, we find it one of Freedom, of Reason, of Love, manly +and tender, generous and intelligent. And this same Theology passing in +its essence from Paul to Augustine, to Luther, to Wesley, has always +been the motive power of human civilization and human development. It +has been the friend of free thought, liberty of conscience, and +universal progress. + +I mean then by a true Theology what Paul meant when he said that God +"has not given to us a spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of +a sound mind." I mean what he said when he declared that God had made +him a minister of the New Testament, not of the letter but of the +spirit; for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. + +I mean the Theology which places the substance above the form; the thing +before the name; which looks at the fact, not at the label. + +Let us then, brethren, who call ourselves Unitarians, be glad and +grateful for the gospel of faith and hope which we enjoy. And let us +give to others what we have ourselves received. If it be true, as we +have tried to show, that human progress depends largely on a true +Theology we cannot help mankind more than by diffusing widely that which +God has given us of his truth. Freely you have received, freely give. +You who have always lived in this community, surrounded by this mellow +warm light of peace and freedom, do not know, cannot tell, what those +suffer who have been taught from early childhood to fear God, and to +distrust his light in their soul. Do your part in spreading abroad the +beams of a better day. Give to the world that religion which is not a +spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind. + + + + +THE RISE AND DECLINE + +OF THE + +ROMISH CHURCH. + +By ATHANASE COQUEREL, Fils. + + +We live in a time of great and manifold changes. There is one church +that for centuries has had her principal glory in asserting that she +never has changed,--that she has at all times been exactly the same; but +now she can hardly deny that either in accordance with her own will, or +by the force of circumstances, very great changes have been wrought in +her during the last few years. This, if it is true, must change also the +nature, the system, the course of our controversy with her. The +controversy between the two churches has not always, perhaps, been quite +fair; and I should not like to be unfair to any adversary, whoever he +may be. I should not be at ease in my conscience if I thought I had been +unfair to any thing, especially to any thing religious, of whatever kind +that religion may be; because in any religion, even the most imperfect, +there is some aspiration from this earth to the sky; at least, from +human souls to what they hope or believe to be God. And especially I +could not pardon myself for being in any way unjust to that great church +which has for centuries comforted and sustained a multitude of souls, +and made them better and happier by her teachings. It is a Christian +church; and though I think that Romish Christianity has been in a very +great degree alloyed, and mixed with grave errors,--and that is exactly +what I wish to show,--yet, even under that veil of human errors, I +recognize, I acknowledge, religion, Christianity; and therefore I bow +before it. + +I think, however, the changes that have taken place have not altered the +essential character of the Roman Church. I think the changes that have +happened are in conformity with the nature of that church; really were +to be expected, and have nothing absolutely new in them. We might, +perhaps, for a long time have seen them coming; and, if we had had +foresight enough, we might have seen them from the very first times of +that church. Let us try to understand exactly what she is, what she +means; let us try to see what there is under that name, "Roman Catholic +Church." She calls herself _catholic_, which means _universal_, and at +the same time she has a local name. She is for the whole world; but at +the same time she belongs to one city, and she bears the name of that +city. Why? This is the question; and though it seems only a question of +name, I think we shall find by other ways that it is a question of +facts. A second advance requires a change in our polemics with Roman +authority. A new science has been created in our time, which gives us +better means of judging and studying other churches than our own; that +science is called the comparative history of religions. In England Max +Müller, in France Burnouf, and in this country James Freeman Clarke, +have compared the history of several religions. According to that +comparative history, there are rules to be understood, to be +acknowledged, in the development of religion. One of the rules which I +think we can deduce from any comparative history of religion may be a +startling one; and I will use a very homely comparison, to make myself +perfectly understood. Have you ever seen over a shop door a sign-board, +where the name of the old shop-keeper was painted; and, when his +successor came in, he had the same board covered with a new color, and +his own name painted over the old one? But in time the new paint wore +off, so that the old name reappeared under the new, in such a way that +it became perhaps difficult to distinguish clearly which letters or +lines belonged to the old, and which to the new. If this image appears +somewhat too familiar, let me ask you if you remember what scholars call +a palimpsest. Sometimes in the Middle Ages it was difficult to find +well-prepared parchment on which to write, and there were a great many +monks who had nothing else to do--and it was the best use they could +make of their time--but write or copy the Bible or other religious +books. When they found parchments where were copied the comedies and +tragedies or other works of the heathen, they thought those were of very +little use, and they could very easily have the writing on those +parchments washed out, or covered over with white paint, in such a way +that what had been written there was no more visible. Then on those +parchments they would write the Bible, or sermons, or any document they +thought useful. But the same thing happened then that happened with the +sign-board,--the old writing reappeared after a time; the white covering +spread over the page disappeared. And thus it happens that scholars are +sometimes pondering for a long time over a page from a sermon of Saint +Augustine, or John Chrysostom, in which they find a verse from some +comedy of Terence or Aristophanes; then they have perhaps some trouble +in making out which is comedy and which is sermon, in distinguishing +exactly what of the writing is old and what is new; and they have not +always perfectly succeeded in that effort. + +Now what we see in the sign-board we see also in the religion of the +different churches, when a whole multitude, at one time, pass from one +worship to another. Then, against their will, and perhaps without their +knowing it, they never come into the pale of their new church +empty-handed: they carry with them a number of ideas, and habits, and +turns of thought, which they had found in their old worship. And thus, +after a time, when the fervor of the early days is over, you find in the +new religion, or new worship, a real palimpsest: the old one is +reappearing under the new. That makes itself manifest in a good many +ways; sometimes in ways the most strange and unexpected. + +If you ask me, now, remembering this rule, what means the name, "Roman +Catholic Church," I answer: Christianity absorbed into itself the Roman +empire; the Roman empire became Christian in a very few years, with a +most rapid, with a most admirable sway; souls became conquered in large +numbers; they became Christian. But afterwards it appeared that they +were not so perfectly unheathenized as they were thought to be, or as +they thought themselves: many of their heathenish habits of life, +thoughts, and customs remained even in their very worship. Thus, after +Christianity had absorbed the Roman world, it appeared that the Roman +world had penetrated and impregnated the whole of Christianity; and this +is the Roman Catholic Church. She is Christian, but she is full of the +errors and superstitions that belonged to the old Roman heathenish +world. + +To understand what this means we must now try to comprehend what the old +Roman genius was. Here I ask you not to confound it with the Greek +genius, which was in many respects highly superior, but which had, at +that time, passed away in a large measure, and been replaced everywhere +by the Roman genius. What were the especial traits of character of the +Romans? The first, and a very striking one to those who have travelled +and studied in those countries, is a most vivacious love for tradition. +In Rome, at the present day, you find things that are done, that are +said, that are believed, that are liked, because they were two thousand +years ago, without the people themselves having a very clear notion of +it. Their custom--and it is born in their flesh, and in their blood--is +to look backwards, and to see in the past the motives and the precedents +for their acts and for their belief. Of this I could quote to you a +number of instances. I will choose but one. The first time I was in Rome +I stopped, as every traveller does, on the _Piazza del Popolo_. In the +midst of that square is an obelisk, and on one side of the pedestal of +that obelisk is written: "This monument was brought to Rome by the High +Pontiff, Cæsar Augustus." I went round the monument, and on the other +face of the same pedestal I read: "This monument, brought to Rome by the +High Pontiff, Cæsar Augustus, was placed in this square by the High +Pontiff, Sextus V." And then I remembered that one of those High +Pontiffs was a Roman heathen, an Emperor; and that the other was a +Christian, was a priest, was a pope; and I was astonished, at first +sight, to find on two faces of the same stone the same title given to +those two representatives of very different religions. Afterwards, I +observed that this was no extraordinary case, but that in many other +places in Rome instances of the same kind were to be found. I inquired a +little more deeply, perhaps, than some other travellers, into the +meaning of those words. I asked myself why this pope, Sextus V., and +this Emperor Augustus, should each be called "pontiff." What is the +meaning of "pontiff"? "Pontiff" means bridge-maker, bridge-builder. Why +are they called in that way? Here is the explanation of that fact. In +the very first years of the existence of Rome, at a time of which we +have a very fabulous history, and but few existing monuments,--the +little town of Rome, not built on seven hills as is generally supposed; +there are eleven of them now; then there were within the town less than +seven even,--that little town had a great deal to fear from any enemy +which should take one of the hills that were out of town, the Janiculum, +because the Janiculum is higher than the others, and from that hill an +enemy could very easily throw stones, fire, or any means of destruction, +into the town. The Janiculum was separated from the town by the Tiber. +Then the first necessity for the defence of that little town of Rome was +to have a bridge. They had built a wooden bridge over the Tiber, and a +great point of interest to the town was that this bridge should be kept +always in good order, so that at any moment troops could pass over it. +Then, with the special genius of the Romans, of which we have other +instances, they ordained, curiously enough, that the men who were a +corporation to take care of that bridge should be sacred; that their +function, necessary to the defence of the town, should be considered +holy; that they should be priests, and the highest of them was called +"the high bridge-maker." So it happened that there was in Rome a +corporation of bridge-makers, _pontifices_, of whom the head was the +most sacred of all Romans, because in those days his life, and the life +of his companions, was deemed necessary to the safety of the town. +Things changed; very soon Rome was large enough not to care about the +Janiculum; very soon Rome conquered a part of Italy, then the whole of +Italy, and finally almost the whole of the world. But when once +something is done in Rome, it remains done; when once a thing is said, +it remains said, and is repeated; and thus it happened that the +privilege of the bridge-makers' corporation, as beings sacred and holy, +remained; and that privilege made everybody respect them; gave them a +sort of moral power. Then kings wanted to be made High Bridge-makers; +after kings, consuls; later, dictators; and, later, emperors themselves +made themselves High Bridge-makers, which meant the most sacred persons +in the town. + +When Constantine, who is generally called the first Christian +emperor,--but who was very far from being a real Christian,--when +Constantine became nominally a Christian, he did not leave off being the +high bridge-maker of the heathen. He remained high priest of the heathen +at the same time he was a Christian emperor; and he found means, as well +as his son after him, to keep the two functions. He acted on some +occasions as high pontiff of the heathen; on other occasions, he called +councils, presided over them, and sent them away when he had had enough +of their presence; declared to the bishops that he was in some sense one +of them, and acted to all intents and purposes as popes have acted after +him. Thus that title remained the type of whatever was most sacred in +Rome; and the bishop of Rome, when an opportunity came,--when the title +had been lost in Rome by emperors,--took it up again. And thus we see on +the same stone, at the present time in Rome, the name of a high +bridge-maker who is a heathen emperor, and the name of a high +bridge-maker who is a pope, who is the head of the Christian Catholic +Church. Thus you see an old superstition, an old local superstition, +established with a political meaning, has survived itself, has survived +centuries, has survived the downfall of heathenism, and is at the +present time flourishing. You all know that the present pope is called +_Pontifex Maximus_; it is his title; and everywhere you see, even on the +pieces of money, that Pio Nono is _Pontifex Maximus_,--the great +bridge-maker, which means the highest of all priests, of all sacred +beings. Thus has tradition, on that special spot, and in connection with +the history and with the antiquities of that spot, established an +authority unequalled anywhere else. + +Though the Roman Catholic Church is special to that place, and inherits +the local habits and traditions, it pretends also to universality. This +is, again, perfectly Roman. The heathen Romans had thought for centuries +that the world was made to be conquered by them; that unity was +represented by Rome; that Rome was all in all; and at the present time +the Pope, on Thursday of every Easter week, gives his solemn blessing, +as you know, to the town first, and the world afterwards,--_urbi et +orbi_. All countries, both hemispheres, all nations, all languages, are +lost in that great unity. One town and one world, of which that town is +the capital,--that was the wish, the hope of the heathenish Romans for +centuries; and that has been the aim, the assumption of papal Rome for +centuries also. When the present Pope said, on a celebrated day, after +enumerating the great acts of his pontificate, that he had created more +bishoprics than any other pope, he was right. He has created, on his own +authority, bishoprics in Holland, in England, and in other countries; +cut out bishoprics on the map of those countries. And he did that +because, as pope, he is the spiritual sovereign of the world; because +England and Holland belong to him; because Rome is the capital of the +world; and he cuts off a part of any country, in America as well as in +Europe, in order to make of it the see or dominion of a bishop. The old +Roman idea was that nobody knew how to govern except Romans. They +assumed--and often, if an unscrupulous government was the best of all, +if a tyrannical government was the best of all, they were right--to +govern better, more wisely, and with more acute politics, than any other +nation. They said, "Other sciences, other arts, may be the share of +other nations; but our share in the great things of this world is +_government_." I hardly dare to speak Latin in an English country, +because I cannot pronounce Latin as you do; but though I pronounce it as +a Frenchman, which is, perhaps, a shade less bad than to pronounce it as +you do in England and America, you may guess what I mean when I recall +to the memory of some of you the famous lines of Virgil, where he says +what must be, in this world, the function of the Romans:-- + + "Tu regere imperio populos, Romane, memento; + Hæ tibi erunt artes." + +That is to say, "You Romans! remember that you are made to govern the +nations; that must be your office; all the arts come after this; this is +the special Roman art." I declare to you that at this present moment +the clergy, the cardinals, the bishops, the prelates, the court of Rome, +think, and have never ceased to think, that they are the people to +govern better than any other political body; and that the government of +the world has been providentially reserved to that town; first, in a +temporal way, for the heathen; and, secondly, in a spiritual way, for +the Christians, for the Catholic countries of the world. And as they +believe spiritual things are a great deal more important than temporal +things, they think their government is a great deal more important, and +greatly superior to any government of any kind. + +Let us now turn back a little again, and try more fully to understand +what the old Roman genius was in its way of government. They governed by +laws. You all have heard about Roman law, about Roman jurisprudence. It +has been said for centuries that they were men who, better than any +other, understood the art of making laws,--very precise, full of +foresight, forgetting nothing, or few things, and giving in the most +exact terms the decisions to be enforced in all possible cases, at least +in all the cases with which they had occasion to deal. It is said also, +it has always been said, that their laws were hard; but they accepted +them, though hard: "_dura lex, sed lex_." And certainly there was +something noble and good in this respect for law, whatever the law was: +there was something just, really in the interest of nations, in this +love of law. But at that time this love of law was accompanied by the +fact that the law was exceedingly hard in a great number of cases. Yet +that hardness was in conformity with the general temperament of the +nation at that time: the Romans were hard. + +I have no time to stop to show you how different they were from the +Greeks; but you remember that when the Greeks assembled in one of their +great annual festivals, they heard music, they listened to poetry, they +listened to the works of the historian; or they saw men run races, or +engage in one of those contests that were not cruel, that were only +displays of strength, agility, or training. That was the pleasure of the +Greeks in their annual festival. What did the Romans do? You all know. +They had immense amphitheatres where they assembled to see men kill one +another. Their pleasure was to see people die, to see people suffer, to +see people maimed, and weltering in their blood: that was their favorite +amusement. And ambitious men in that day secured votes by bringing +lions, hyenas, and tigers, in large numbers, to Rome, and by giving the +people the diversion of seeing those animals killing men, devouring +living men, women, and children, living Christians, often. That was the +punishment in fashion at that time: Christian men, women, and children +were killed, were devoured, were mangled before the eyes of the people, +and for their pleasure. In their hardness they had a taste for the +formal, precise execution of their law, whatever it might be. +Christianity came and swept away their abominable pleasures,--this +cruelty, which was contrary to every human feeling; but the habit of a +sort of hardness, in the infliction of the penalties of law, remained in +Rome more than it did in any other place. And this was allied to another +feeling of a different nature, but which very well connected itself with +it. I mean the Roman love for the literal in every thing. They did not +like to understand any thing as metaphorical, as poetry: they liked to +take every thing literally; and it was in consequence of this +characteristic of the Roman mind that they were able to enforce their +law. Even if the result of what the law demanded was absurd, they +maintained, for the honor of the law, that it must be literally +understood, and literally executed; and they permitted none of those +different ways of alleviating the hardships of the law that have been in +other places not only allowed, but ordered, by those in command. This is +of extreme importance. Perhaps at first sight it does not strike you so, +but it is. Remember from what country Christianity came. Christianity +came from the East, came from Asia, came from the Jews. The Apostles, +the first propagators of Christianity, were Oriental men, were Jews. I +have seen part of the Levant, I have seen those very countries, and I +can speak of it as a fact known for centuries, that the people of the +Orient never speak otherwise than by images. They do not like the +shortest way from one point to another; they make the way long. They use +flowers, and rays of light, and moonshine, or any thing else that gives +an image and color to their speech. They bring these things in +continually, whatever may be the subject they speak of. + +Perhaps I may give here an illustration that will make you understand +me. I was in a house made of branches of trees, where lived a sheik. He +told me that every thing in that house, his own person, his own family, +were mine; and he said this with the greatest protestations. This is +exactly the same as if you should say to a foreigner, coming into your +house, "You are welcome." Nothing more. If, on going away, I had taken +any thing from that house, the man would immediately have shot me; +though he had given me every thing, even to his own person and his own +family; because he would have had this idea: "This man is a thief; I +have a thief in my house." If I had said, "But you gave me every thing +in the house," he would have answered me, "You come from a country where +people have no politeness. I gave you these things: that means +_welcome_, and nothing more." Thus a man of the Orient never says any +thing in the simple short way that Western nations do: they always want +some poetry, some rhetoric, some image about it. And you must remember +that many of the most admirable teachings of the Bible are in images, +are in poetry, and are extremely beautiful and eloquent by their poetry. +We are accustomed to this, so that we know that it is poetry; and we +understand it. But the Romans, accustomed to their principle, that the +law may be hard, but that law is law, and must be understood literally, +and executed literally, understood every thing literally, and in that +way they spoiled many of the great Christian truths. I will not here +quote many instances, though it would be exceedingly easy to bring them +in large numbers before you. I will take the most striking and best +known of all. When our Lord, a few hours before being separated from his +disciples, to die on the cross, gave them of the bread that was on the +table, and said, "Eat, this is my body," it was absolutely impossible +for Eastern people to misunderstand him; it was impossible for them not +to understand that he meant, "This represents my body." The idea that +what he held in the hands of his own body was his own body again; that +he gave them his own body to eat, and that he ate some of it himself +with them,--that idea could not for a moment have entered the head of +one of those who were there. And if a multitude had been there, instead +of the twelve Apostles, it would have been exactly the same. Nobody +would have understood, when the Lord said, "I am the way," or when he +said, "I am the door," that he was really, in fact, a path or a gate; +everybody knew that he meant, "I am the leader; you must come with me; I +show you the way." Everybody in the Orient understood that. But here +comes the Roman genius, taking every thing literally; and they repeat, +"He said, 'This is my body,' and this _is_ his body." They repeat: "You +Protestants do not accept the truth coming from the lips of your Master. +He says, 'This is my body,' but you Protestants say, 'No, it is not his +body, it represents his body.'" Thus it seems we are convicted of crime; +it seems we will not accept the teachings of our Lord; yet we are +perfectly true to his own meaning, to his real meaning, that could not +be misunderstood in the East, but that was misunderstood when it was +carried to Rome, a country where people gloried in taking every thing in +a literal sense. So they did with many other most beautiful and delicate +things in the Bible. The Roman genius--I cannot help saying it--had +something clumsy in it. They were like giants, having very strong arms, +and enormous hands, to take every thing, and to dominate over every +thing. But any thing very delicate, very poetic, like flowers from the +East, they could not touch without the flowers being broken and faded, +losing their charm and their color. That was their way of treating many +of the most beautiful things of the Bible, which they did not +understand; which they made absurd or repulsive, by taking in a literal +sense what was said, and ought to be taken, in a spiritual sense. They +acted exactly as we should, if we received an Oriental letter and +understood as literal every thing contained in it. + +I will give another instance to make this clear. I remember having seen +two letters, written one by a French General, and another by +Abd-el-Kader, the chief of the enemies of the French in Algeria. These +letters were intended to convey identically the same thing; that is to +say, that some prisoners on one side were to be exchanged for the same +number of prisoners on the other side. It had been decided that the +French General and the Arab chief should say the same thing. I have seen +both. The French General writes two lines; very clear, distinct, and +polite, with nothing but the exact meaning he wanted to convey. But +Abd-el-Kader, meaning to write the same thing, writes a whole page, +about flowers, and jewels, and roses, and moonshine, and every thing of +the kind. His intention was to say exactly the same thing, to convey +identically the same meaning; but these things, translated from one +language to another, pass, as a celebrated German scholar says, "from +the Shemitic to the Japhetic; from the poetic language of the sons of +Shem, to the precise language of the sons of Japhet." This has been the +fault of the Roman Catholic Church in many dogmas, in many points of +very high importance: the sons of Japhet could not understand what the +sons of Shem meant. They thought they understood it, when they were +entirely in error, and gave to it a meaning altogether different from +what was intended. + +I must add, that what helped them along in this belief of things, taken +in a literal sense, was Roman superstition. In that town, and in Italy, +have always prevailed the strangest superstitions. The most celebrated +Romans, men whose wisdom and whose glory have filled the world, if they +met, when they went out of their house in the morning, a hare in the +way, re-entered their house on the instant, and renounced any thing they +had to do, because meeting a hare was ominous of misfortune, and any +thing they should undertake that day would result in their confusion or +misfortune. When they put their foot in the wrong way, the left before +the right, or the right before the left, on the stone at the entrance of +a house, they stopped there and returned to their house, because every +thing they should do in that house would prove unfortunate, since they +had made a mistake in putting the wrong foot foremost when they entered +the house. + +So there were a multitude of superstitions. You know when they were to +decide the greatest questions of peace or war, they consulted their +sacred chickens. They gave them grains of wheat, and if the chickens ate +it, or if they refused to eat it, or if they ate it too fast, or if the +chickens let fall a grain of wheat from their mouths,--these signs meant +that war would be successful, or that it would not be, and they decided +according to these whether there should be a war or not. And those great +magistrates, who were sometimes men of the greatest eminence, like +Cicero, were augurs. You know what Cicero says, "Two of us cannot meet +without laughing;" because they knew that their auguries were utterly +worthless, but the multitude thought they were true. So the Romans were +superstitious to the highest degree, and they have never ceased to be +so. There is superstition in the marrow of their bones. Many Romans are +ready to believe any thing to-day, at the present moment. I shall allude +to a single fact. They all believe devoutly in the evil eye; that there +are people who, if they look at you, will bring upon you some horrible +misfortune, disease, or death. They believe this so fully, that they +have a gesture, representing with their fingers a pair of horns; and, +when they meet any one who is supposed to have the evil eye, they +endeavor, in a secret way, to make that sign, to prevent misfortune from +coming upon them. It is believed, in Rome, that the present pope, who is +to them God on earth, who is to them the successor and vicar of Jesus +Christ, that he, as a man, has the evil eye. And when he passes through +the streets of Rome, a great many women, devoutly kneeling before him, +with their heads almost in the dust, craving to receive his blessing, as +he passes in his carriage, will, under their aprons, make this sign, to +preserve themselves from the effects of the evil eye. This is no +disparagement to his person; they think that the poor man cannot help +it; that there is no ill will in it; that it is fate; he has the evil +eye. + +I could cite many other instances of this superstition; perhaps it will +be enough to refer to one more, and one that disgusted me completely. It +is the worship with which they surround the _Santo Bambino_. There is on +the Capitoline Hill a church that was formerly a heathen temple, and +which has kept an old name, "_Ara C[oe]li_," or "altar of Heaven." In +that church, the Franciscan monks keep a very ugly doll. This doll is +said to have been sculptured out of one of the olive-trees on the Mount +of Olives, and then Saint Luke is supposed to have painted it over. +Saint Luke must have been the painter of the poorest daubs that ever +were in the world, and the angels who took it to him must have been very +far from being connoisseurs of painting. This doll is covered with +diamonds, emeralds, sapphires, and other precious stones, of greatest +price. It is kept in a box on the altar, and, when you ask to see it, +the monks pray before the door, they light tapers, they produce the box, +and then the box is opened, and you see the hideous little wooden image. +Now, this _Santo Bambino_ is supposed to have healing properties. He +heals people, when they are rich enough to pay a good salary to him; he +is not a physician who heals for nothing. He has a magnificent carriage +of his own, and servants with his own livery; and, when any rich man +wants to be cured by him, the _Santo Bambino_ goes in his own carriage +to the man's house, carried on the knees of Franciscan monks, and cures +the patient,--if he can. Such is the belief of the country. But I could +not see any very great difference between that doll and the idols that +the old Romans had, and used in the same way. The idea is this: they +suppose that the _Santo Bambino_ represents Christ as a little child. + +Not only were the old Romans superstitious, but we know, by historical +testimony coming from the heathen themselves, that at the time when +Christianity appeared there was an increase of superstition; there was a +general feeling of a want of something definite, something like a sort +of atonement; and at that time all sorts of ceremonies, all sorts of +bloody sacrifices, were introduced from Syria, from Libya, from the most +remote countries, and the Romans tried to find for their consciences +some satisfaction in those rites. For instance, you all know they had a +custom of having their sins expiated by means of what they called +_taurobolium_. A man had a grave dug in the ground, and then over that +grave was put a marble slab, with a great many holes in it, like a +sieve. In that grave the man stretched himself at full length, and over +the marble slab a bull was killed, in such a way that the blood fell +through the holes into the grave. When the bull was taken away, and the +marble slab was lifted, the man rose out of that grave perfectly covered +with the blood of the bull, entirely bathed in that blood. Then he was +supposed to be a new man, supposed to be washed of all his sins. He +believed that from that moment the anger of the gods had passed to the +bull, and that the blood of the bull had been shed instead of his own. +We find in Ovid, one of the poets of the time, the prayer of a man for +whom was about to be offered up the sacrifice of the black hen. He asks +the gods to take the heart of the hen instead of his own, the fibres of +the hen's body instead of the fibres of his own body. The poor black hen +was sacrificed in the most cruel way they could find; she must suffer as +long as possible, because then the anger of some god who was supposed to +pursue the man found full satisfaction. The ferocity of the god had +ample satisfaction in the torture of the poor black hen, and the sins of +the man were expiated. Then there was superstition upon superstition, +because, when the mangled remains of the unfortunate hen were thrown +into the street, if any person unconsciously put his foot on that body, +then he became the inheritor of the crimes of the first man, and of the +anger of the gods. They had a special name for those bloody remains of +the sacrificed fowl: they called them _purgamentum_, because they +thought that such a sacrifice purged a man of his sins. As nobody dared +lift or touch the body of the victim, they put a fence around it; and, +as long as there remained on the ground in the streets of Rome a vestige +of the poor bird, nobody would tread on that place; and the fence was +put there to prevent this. These were the superstitions of that time; +and Plutarch wrote a treatise to which he gives the title +[Greek: Deisidaimonia], which is translated very often by the word +"superstition;" but it means more than that, it means "terror of the +gods." It means that feeling which was more and more prevailing in the +Roman world, that the gods were to be feared; that there was anger in +heaven; that the earth could not defend itself against the bad will of a +supernatural power. We can very well understand that when Christianity +was preached to those people they were happy to take that religion of +hope, that religion of regeneration and sanctification. It was to them a +marvellous deliverance to be out of that old doctrine and in the new +one. But they carried with them many habits of thought, many things +which were inherent in the ancient religion. Among those things was the +habit of multiplying the divine being. They had been for a long series +of centuries polytheists, believing in many gods. With their +superstitious fears, they were always afraid there were not gods enough. +That was saying a good deal, for they had more than 30,000 of them at +the time of Christ. It was recognized that nobody could even know them +all by name. + +Again you will excuse me if I use here a very familiar illustration to +make the leading thought of polytheism understood. + +You know that in fairy tales the fairies are always called in to the +festival at the baptism of the infant child. The intention is to invite +them all, but there is always one forgotten; and that one curses the +child in some way or other; and then all the gifts of all the good +fairies cannot prevent the child from suffering, at least for a time, +from the bad will of the one that has been forgotten. This involves the +essential idea of polytheists. They had always the thought that all the +good gods whom they worshipped could not prevent any malevolent one who +had been neglected from hurting them; and they were always in search of +that one. They were always making altars "to the unknown god or gods," +to be certain in that way to include them all. They were constantly +asking what gods were worshipped in such a country, in such a place; and +if it was a god that was not known among them, straightway they prepared +a place for his worship. They said, "He has no existence, very likely; +but if he has, if he lives, then we must sacrifice to him, to prevent +his spoiling the happiness that the other good gods wish to give us." So +there was an incessant adding to the immense number of gods. At the time +of Christ, they had so many of them that, from the time a grain of corn +was put into the ground to the time the harvest commenced, they had nine +different deities who in succession took charge of the corn that had +been put into the ground, and thus it passed from one god to another. +Nine of them were necessary while the grain was in the ground. Thus, +when the heathen became Christians, they had been in the constant habit +of adding gods to their heaven, of adding good men to their gods, and +also men not good, but whom they feared,--for all the emperors were made +gods the moment they died, so that one of them, who was rather a wit, +when he was dying said, "I feel that I am becoming a god." The heathen +had become so habituated to this that, when they became Christians, they +continued very naturally to multiply the number of the objects of +worship. They soon ceased to make the slightest difference between +Christ and the Father. In good time they unconsciously put Mary, the +mother of Christ, above Christ; now, without ever having this intention, +they put, in fact, Mary above the Father. And so on, adding always a new +god to a new worship, and always making the new worship as binding and +as efficacious as possible, to satisfy that polytheistic craving. They +did not understand their error in keeping between the infinite God and +themselves an immense number of minor deities. This craving was +unwholesome, but very sincere. That unconscious wish to multiply gods +and make saints has continued to this day; and no pope has canonized so +many saints as the present one, who is always trying to show that he +does more in this way than any of his predecessors. + +This will suffice to give you an idea of what the old spirit of Rome +was, the whole tendency of the Roman mind, and what was brought by them +into the church. I must now ask you to go in imagination with me to the +tomb of one of those old Romans, who were not burned, according to the +custom of that period, say the Scipios. Suppose one of the Scipios taken +out of his tomb; and bring him into a Roman Catholic Church: do you +think he will be very much astonished? He will be astonished at one +thing,--by the crucifix, the image of the crucified Son of God. That was +completely contrary to the Roman ideal and their habit of thought. But +all the other things he will see will not astonish him at all. He had +seen them all his life in his own time. You believe, perhaps, that the +shape of a Roman Catholic Church at Rome will astonish a pagan? Not at +all. Cato had given the Romans the pleasure of enjoying, for the first +time, a portico with three ranges of columns, the middle aisle being +broader than the others; and at the end was what we call an apse, but +the ancients a conch. The end was rounded off, and thrown into the form +of a semi-circle, and the tribunal for the prætor or judge was placed in +that half-circle at the end. This portico was called a _stoa basilica_, +and the first Roman Christian churches were built on that plan. +Afterwards, the idea came of making the church in the shape of a cross; +and then a smaller basilica was placed across the other, forming the +transept of the church. But those long ranges of columns remained, with +the same wide space in the middle, and narrower aisles on either side. +The basilica was the form of public buildings most in fashion in Rome at +that time. There the gothic style was never popular. Even now, of four +or five hundred churches in Rome, only one, the Minerva, is gothic. When +Christian architecture was born, Christian architecture accepted the +heathen plan. + +In the new church, in that _basilica_, what do we find? We find holy +water at the door. That was exactly what you found in the pagan temple, +only it was called lustral water. In the temple, my Scipio, who goes +with me, recognizes all his old habits of thought, all the old emblems +of his religious devotion. He sees a number of statues, or images; but +he has seen those all his life. There is not only a central shrine, but +there are small chapels. The saints have a golden circle round their +heads: Christians call it the _aura_, the ancients called it the +_nimbus_; but it was exactly the same thing. They had it around the +heads of their deities in painting and sculpture, and so on. There are +censers and there are tapers burning there; and there are all the +ornaments a pagan was accustomed to see in his temple. All those things +had been kept, had been re-established, and the pagans had brought them +with them into the Catholic churches. When I went for the first time to +Naples, the man who showed me the museum there showed me feet, legs, and +arms, hands, eyes, and ears, in stone. He said, "These are _ex voto_." +People who were ill gave to some of the gods, the ones they chose, these +things as marks of gratitude for having been cured. The cicerone told +me, "You see, sir, it is exactly the same thing we have in our +churches." And so it is. In all the churches in Naples and Rome, and in +the Roman Catholic churches all over Spain and France, you see, in wax, +in gold, in silver, and in stone, such legs and arms, eyes and ears. It +is exactly the same thing. The heathen man said to his god, "I will pay +you by this mark of honor and gratitude, by this mark of your power and +your glory, if you cure me." The Roman Catholic says exactly the same +thing to a saint, to the Virgin, sometimes to Jesus, and very rarely to +God. + +I cannot mention here all the other details, like funeral services at +the end of the year, like funeral chapels, like many other institutions +that exist in the Roman Catholic Church, that are practised every day in +it, and that are exactly the same, so far as religious ideas go, as were +practised in the pagan churches. But I must add something of more +consequence than that, about the worship of human beings, and especially +of the worship of the Virgin Mary. It was nothing new to the Pagans to +worship a woman, and especially to worship a virgin. That was one of the +ideas the most familiar to their devotion. In Rome they had the temple +of Hestia or Vesta, who was supposed to be a virgin; and she had around +her nuns who were pledged to live in celibacy, and punished by death if +they did not remain true to their vow. In Greece it was the same thing +with Pallas. Perhaps you all know that in Athens, the largest, most +perfect, and most beautiful of the Greek temples--immensely superior to +any edifice I ever saw in any country--is called the Parthenon, which +means the Virgin Temple. That temple is the temple of Pallas,--Athene, +or Minerva,--who was the principal deity of Athens. Thus that idea was +perfectly familiar to them, and they only kept it, and brought it with +them into Christianity. + +I have spoken of monks. You must not believe that the monks are by any +means a Roman Catholic invention. In the East there have been monks in +all times and in all religions. It seems to have been a special habit or +taste of the people of the East to give some men no other business, no +other work to do, but to live in solitude, and pray for them; and some +men have always, in those very hot countries, where it is exceedingly +tiresome to work, liked to live in perpetual prayer better than any +other more fatiguing labor. We find the monk in all times and countries +in the East, then in the West; and he has been imported from paganism +into Christianity, like all the rest. I do not believe there is a +religion more completely contrary to the monastic feeling than the +religion of Christ. I do not think there was ever a type more radically +contrary to the type of the monk, than the figure of Christ as we find +it in the Bible. However, that old monkish spirit of the Orient was +always known to the Romans from the beginning; for they had priests and +monks from the time their city began. That spirit has, like other +things, been smuggled into the Church, though it was contrary to the +spirit of Christianity. + +I must recall one last rite of great importance. Both the old Romans and +the old Jews had, as a principal part of their worship, the rite of +sacrifice. The origin of it was simply this: that men in the first place +possessed nothing but flocks, and they gave to God one head of their +flock, one sheep, or one bull, as being the only riches they had to +give. Before they had houses, before they had garments, before they had +any other thing,--money they were very far from having,--men had to eat, +and they had flocks because they wanted to have meat to eat; and thus +they gave to God the only necessity of life to them, the only thing they +understood the importance of. And they gave him the whole animal, not +reserving to themselves any part of it, in some cases; in other cases, a +part of it only, making a meal of the rest for themselves. To give a +part to God was one essential element of their worship, the rite of +sacrifice; and we find that the rite grew out of that, and nothing else. +It was a habit deeply rooted in the Roman mind, and at the same time +already familiar to the Jews; and when those Christians who had been +Jews spoke of Christ to the Romans, they could not prevent that Roman or +Jewish habit from taking double force, and double space in religion. +What happened? It happened that the old Romans and old Jews wanted a +sacrifice; wanted to give something to God; wanted a victim; and then +came this strange fact, very easy to understand however, of which we +find traces in the first days of Christianity,--that there was no better +victim to offer to God than Christ. When they had identified completely +Christ with the Father, then there was no greater victim to offer to +God than God himself. Therefore, they had a sacrifice that is called +"the mass." You know the official name is "sacrifice of the mass." It +consists in this. The priest takes the host, which is merely bread,--it +is nothing but a little flour and water, made into bread,--he pronounces +the consecrating words; then, after he pronounces them, there is no +bread, there is no flour; instead of the bread, instead of the flour, +there is Jesus Christ. According to the Council of Trent, that _is_ +Jesus Christ, his body, his blood, his soul, and his divinity; it is +Jesus Christ; is perfect God. And this has been, by an old Roman +Catholic writer, very clearly expressed in these three words: "The +priest, what is he? what does he do? _Creatus Creatorem creat._" He is a +creature who creates the Creator. After that comes the second great part +of the sacrifice of the mass. There is God, and the priest sacrifices +God to God. And how? _Sacrificat manducando._ That is to say, according +to the formal explanation, he sacrifices God by eating God. This is the +sacrifice of the mass. If the Roman mind had not been accustomed, as I +have shown you, to superstition, to all literalism, to the love of the +law and the letter, even when the law or the letter was absurd, they +would not easily have accepted all this; but with their turn of mind, +with their way of taking things, that was exactly what they wished for, +and that was what they adopted. Not at once: it was very long in +elaborating itself. It was so completely, I cannot say otherwise, so +completely absurd, that it required a great deal of time to make it so +precise; but they attained to that at last, and they could not but do +so. See, then, what a man the priest is. He has before him bread, and he +makes God; he afterwards sacrifices God; he is almost a God himself. At +the moment when he makes God, he seems to be superior to God; at the +moment when he sacrifices God, by eating him, he seems superior to God. +Thence comes the immense power of the priesthood, of priestcraft. And as +if this were not enough, in the mass, as you know, the priest has not +only the host, but he has the wine, the cup. The other members of the +church have not the cup, because they must not be equal to the priest +even in the communion; even in the act of uniting themselves with God. +Laymen cannot arrive at the height of glory to which the priest arrives; +they must eat the host when it is given to them, but they cannot touch +the cup; that is reserved to the priest, a sort of heavenly, or divine, +or godlike character. Even as the Romans had respected their old +bridge-makers, their old _pontifices_, their old priests, whom they +considered the bulwarks of their town, they respected afterwards the +priests of the Roman Catholic Church. So the mass was established, with +all its consequences. + +This is not all. I must explain exactly how a part of the heathenish +religion answered, in the time of Jesus, the wants of the heathen better +than the more natural religion of the Christians. At the time of Christ, +many Romans did not believe in thirty thousand gods and in all the +absurd and indecent history of those thirty thousand deities, but they +had a form of worship that had become purer and purer. They had what +they called "Mysteries." In Greece, and in Rome also, there were +"Mysteries." These were ceremonies in which great philosophic and +religious lessons were given. There exists a very touching letter from +Plutarch to his wife, written at the time he lost his only daughter, and +when they were in the deepest affliction and desolation. He writes to +his wife, who was separated from him at that time, a very kind and +loving letter, trying to give her comfort and hope. He says to her, +"Remember the beautiful things we have seen together in the Mysteries of +Bacchus." You must not believe, as many would at first believe, that the +Mysteries of Bacchus were nothing but drunkenness and disorder: they +were something else. They were like the Mysteries of Ceres, the Goddess +of Corn, and like the representations, in other cases, of the +immortality of the soul. They were a sort of tragedy in which, less by +word than by singing, and by acting especially, was shown to men that, +when the body is interred in the ground, the soul lives, and the soul +shall rise to fulness of life. A grain of wheat hidden in the ground +remained hidden there for weeks before coming to life. That was the +emblem of the new life of immortality. Now, this teaching, good in +itself, true in itself, but given in dramatic images, was at that time +the very best, soundest, most human, and most natural part of +heathenism. And then it happened that Mysteries were acted, not only in +the heathen churches, but in Christian churches; that the history of +Christ, that the death of Christ, that the resurrection of Christ, took +the place of the resurrection of Proserpine, the daughter of Ceres, who +represented wheat and corn; and then Christianity became a sort of +subject of sacred myths, sacred plays, that were very devoutly acted, +and that kept their title of "Mysteries." As soon as we see something of +the dark ages, and what the practice of worship was, we see this same +thing. It is going on in all countries in some measure. You may see it +in the Roman Catholic churches during Easter week. You may see then +that, when Christ dies, all the lights are put out, save one very small +light, because that represents the moment when the sky was covered with +darkness at his death. And you hear in a choir some persons sing the +words of the people who screamed "Crucify him!" and others repeating the +words of Caiaphas and the words of Christ. This "Mystery," this serious, +devout play, is acted in all Roman Catholic churches. When Christ is +dead, the host is taken away from the altar, and it is carried into the +tomb, carried into some lower chapel, from which it comes back to the +great altar on Easter morning, on the day of the resurrection. That +solemn play is going on in all Roman Catholic countries at the present +time, and that is a "Mystery." Such is also the "Mystery" that was +played in Germany, at Oberammergau (Bavaria), during the last year, and +is played there every ten years. It is a devout, religious, serious, +dramatic representation of our Lord's suffering, death, and +resurrection. The mass in itself was in the beginning a Mystery; it is +often called so; it is often called in old Roman Catholic books and +often in modern ones the "Mystery of the Mass." It was a representation +of the death and sacrifice of Jesus; but the Roman Catholic spirit +coming in declared that this Mystery was not, like others, a mere +representation, a sacred play, but a reality; and according to the +doctrine proclaimed by the Council of Trent, three hundred years ago, +the sacrifice of the mass is much more than a representation of Christ's +death, of Christ's sacrifice, for he is sacrificed anew, he suffers +death really anew. And it has been declared, because some Protestant +opponents were astonished at it, that every time any priest says +mass,--and every priest must say mass at least once every day,--every +time a priest says mass, Christ suffers again, and dies again, +sacrificed by the priest for the redemption of human kind. This is the +doctrine of the mass, and this gives it a very tragic, grand, and solemn +effect in the eyes of those who believe in it. Yet this again is nothing +but Roman literalism, the Roman way of taking every thing literally. + +Is all this real Christianity? At all events I have said enough, I hope, +to give you an idea of the way in which the religion of Jesus of +Nazareth, as he was called, preached by him on the hills of Galilee,--a +religion that was quite spirit, and quite truth; a religion that had at +that time no bleeding, no consecrated man, but that was alive by the +Spirit of God in the conscience and in the hearts of men,--how that +religion, purely spiritual as it was, became all the pomp, all the +exterior complications, all the dramatic intricacies of the Church of +Rome. + +And here I stop to ask again, Can all this suit the urgent necessities +of our times? Is that the truth after which our souls hunger and thirst? + +Now I must, before I end, say a few words to you about the late changes. +Do those changes make matters better or worse? Let us pass over ages and +centuries, and come to the present day, because I say we must make some +change in our way of resisting the Church of Rome. I must state, and +very rapidly, what these changes are. There are three of them. The first +is, that a new dogma has been established. The new dogma amounts to +this, without going into details, that Mary, the mother of Christ, was +created, at the moment she began to exist, exempt from original sin. All +human beings are guilty of Adam's sin, with one exception, and that +exception is Mary. That exception dates from the very first instant of +her existence. She never was, even in thought or in feeling, a sinner; +she is consequently out of the pale of humanity; she is not a human +being; she is more than a woman, she is something godlike from before +her birth. That is the dogma. It is not new; it was invented in Spain; +it is a Spanish, an Andalusian dogma. It was invented at a time when the +Catholics in Spain were laboring very hard to expel from their country +the Moors, the African Moslems, who were masters of a great part of +Spain, and who had more science, more art, and more literary culture +than the Christians of Spain, but who had absurd doctrines about the +family and about religion, as well you know. Nothing could displease +them more, could astonish them more, or could confound all their ideas +more, than to tell them that a woman was godlike. They thought, as all +Moslems have thought, that a woman had no soul; and here was a woman who +was a goddess before her birth, who was always a goddess. This was +something absolutely incredible to them, and it showed the great +difference between Christians and Moslems, between Spaniards and Arabs. +This became the general rule among the Spaniards of the southern part of +the country, in Andalusia especially; and when they met one another they +did not salute with words of good greeting, but for centuries it was the +habit in Andalusia, when one Spaniard met another, to say to him, _Ave +Maria purissima_, and the other answered, _Sin pecado concepida_, which +means that that dogma was proclaimed every time two persons met. This +dogma has been taken into special favor by the very powerful order of +Jesuits. They thought it was important to the church; it was putting +Mary in the highest honor, to have that dogma become the law of the +church. But up to the present century, up to last year in the Roman +Catholic Church, people could believe it or not; now the Pope has +declared that henceforth every man who does not believe that dogma is +eternally lost and damned. This he has decreed, after consulting with +some bishops, with whom he conferred about it, but declaring that he did +so of his own accord, because, as pope, he had a right to decide on +that. He said, it is no new doctrine; it has always been in the church. +As the great writer Father Perrone wrote, "That dogma has been +developing itself in the church a long time." When I saw the Church of +Rome speaking of a dogma "developing itself," I thought, This is the +beginning of the end. If they understand that dogmas develop themselves, +that they have not fallen like aerolites from the heavens, it seems to +me that that is the end of infallibility. Some people think it was the +beginning of infallibility, that it was the Pope for the first time +declaring a dogma for all men without consulting officially or legally +any one, and that when he had done this he had augmented his power. I +must remark here, that when a pope is very weak, the general rule is, he +does something extremely strong. When he is extremely weak, politically, +materially, he generally makes some great demonstration of spiritual +power. When Pope Gregorius VII. kept Henry in his shirt a whole night at +the door of the castle of Canossa without opening the door to him, +saying, "You are a sinner, do penance,"--when he did that, the Pope had +been expelled from Rome, he had lost Rome, therefore he must prove his +immense spiritual power, because his temporal power was lost. And when +the present Pope has done acts of authority greater than any other pope, +it has not been because he was strong, but because he was weak; to +remain on his throne he wanted to have the bayonets of Louis Bonaparte +to keep him in power. His own subjects would very soon have shown him a +second time the way to the frontier, if they had not been prevented by +the bayonets of that man. Thus the Pope did more towards asserting and +confirming his own power than any of his two hundred and fifty odd +predecessors. When afterwards he took a new step, it was in continuance +of this. He called a council when three hundred years had elapsed since +an [oe]cumenical council had been called. I know old Roman Catholic +families who had been waiting for centuries for the moment when an +[oe]cumenical council should assemble, to denounce before that council +the encroachments of the Pope, and to ask that the popedom be kept +within bounds for the future. Pio IX. had an [oe]cumenical council +called, and held it in his own house, in the Vatican. And there, in one +end of one of the transepts of the immense church of Saint Peter, the +Pope had himself declared infallible by the council. Thus all the other +councils which had been the hope of such persons in the church as could +not accept every word of the Pope, all those councils have been +sacrificed, have abdicated, in the last of them, at the foot of the +Pope. Now, the Roman Catholic Church has become very logically, what it +ought to become, the same thing in the spiritual world that the Roman +Empire became in the temporal world. The Roman Emperor was every thing; +there had been priests and magistrates who had great powers; then the +emperor made himself dictator, consul, tribune of the people; made +himself high bridge-maker; took upon himself all dignities. He was every +thing; and then the whole Roman Empire was one man; and sometimes it +happened that that man was a mad man like Caligula, who said, "I am +sorry that all men have not one head that I might cut it off." Such was +the unity of the Roman Empire, and we see the same fact in the Roman +Catholic Church to this extent, that there is one human brain that +thinks for all Roman Catholics in the world, and if that human brain +decides that such a thing is or is not, all other human brains must +believe it, or be damned eternally; there is no choice. This is +perfectly logical; this is not an unexpected change; this must have come +to pass. As the Pope became physically weak, the more absolute became +the necessity that this should be done. Now, he is weak, he has lost +Rome. Although it was not in my way, I passed through Rome a few months +ago for the purpose of seeing Rome free, and it was an immense joy to +see that. I had seen Rome groaning under that proud, domineering +government of the priests, who declared that their government was the +best in the world, while the whole world called it emphatically _il mal +governo_. Now I have seen it free; and I think no Bonaparte of France, +nor any French Government, nor any other government, had any right to +give up Rome to the priests, to prevent the Romans from being masters in +their own house, from being free in their own city. I must declare to +you, that if in one sense the Roman Catholic Church has lost a great +deal because she has lost that great tradition, lost that long habit of +ruling in Rome, and the high prestige that comes from it, yet the Roman +Catholic Church has gained more perhaps than she has lost in this. You +must not believe that the Roman Catholic Church is to disappear +to-morrow, or the next day: that shall not happen. There are hundreds of +thousands of souls who like better to have one man on a throne thinking +for them, taking on his conscience and his honor the question of their +salvation,--they like that better than to think for themselves; and +there will be Roman Catholic churches for a long time to come. They will +even be stronger in one sense, because that temporal power was so +exercised that it caused great weakness; and now the Pope will be +strengthened; will find more interest and sympathy, because he is a king +without a crown, a king without a throne: in his weakness he will find +new strength. + +What must we do, we Protestants, in the presence of this fact? Must we +exaggerate, must we be unfair in our attacks? No. Must we go to sleep, +thinking there is nothing to do? No, not that either. We must work; we +must work steadily to give light and instruction to all. We have +here,--and I have tried in a very rapid way to give you an idea of +it,--we have here history. That is the greatest of weapons in such a +case as this. Usurpers never like history, because they know very well +that history condemns them. We must make history known, make the facts +known, and proclaim liberty and the rights of the human conscience. We +must do that over the whole world. I do not believe that Protestantism, +as it has often been said, is nothing else but Roman Catholicism +stripped of some of its abuses, and without some of its errors. It is +something else. If there were time, and I could begin now instead of +ending, I would try to show you that in the history of Protestantism, +and even before Protestantism appeared, there has always been, next to +that stream of power of Roman Catholicism, always becoming stronger and +more encroaching up to these last days, another current of protest; +there have always been men struggling for faith with liberty, who said, +"That cannot be;" who understood better the Gospel, who liked the spirit +of the Gospel, the spirit of God in Christ, better than the spirit of +Rome. For centuries their mouths may have been closed; their speaking +and teaching punished by death; but always they became more and more +numerous, and active, and vigorous; and then came the great day of +Luther. Protestantism has not been a negation, a remnant of Roman +Catholicism, the negative side of Christianity. I cannot adopt that idea +in the least. True Protestantism is full of the spirit of the Gospel; it +is the living soul of Christ in the Church, it embodies the perfect +conviction that there is truth, that there is salvation, that there is +liberty, in the Gospel, and nowhere else so completely. + +Now, we must consider the Roman Catholic Church as being an organization +of power, the most dreadful, the most tyrannical, the most crushing +organization of power that ever was. It is the master-piece of Roman +genius. It has been preparing during centuries, and it has been complete +only since yesterday. It is a great organization against liberty, +against man's rights, against man's conscience, for the honor of a +church and of a man. And this we must resist, too. In my country, I +declare that the cause of all our ills, the fact that is at the basis of +all our suffering and all our misfortunes, is nothing else than Roman +Catholicism. This is against the conscience of many souls; this throws +many people into sheer Atheism, because they see no choice between +kissing the shoe of the Pope, as is done in ceremonies, and denying the +existence of God. So they deny God rather than submit to the Pope. We +must give them sound teaching, religious teaching; we must give them +the Gospel. And I came to this country to say these things to you; to +ask you to help us with all your might, and with all your heart, to do +what is necessary should be done in France to-day; what will be +necessary to be done in this country sooner or later, and what will be +necessary to be done in all countries, to show more and more that "where +is the Spirit of the Lord, there is liberty." + + + + +SELFHOOD AND SACRIFICE + +By ORVILLE DEWEY. + + +The title which I have chosen for this discourse, is Selfhood and +Sacrifice. My purpose is, to consider what place these principles have +in human culture. I use the word, selfhood, rather than self-regard or +self-interest, because I wish to go back to the original +principle--selfhood, according to the analogy of our language, +describing the simple and absolute condition in which self exists; as +manhood does that of man, or childhood, that of a child. And I say +sacrifice, rather than self-sacrifice, because the true principle does +not require the sacrifice of our highest self, but only of that which +unlawfully hinders outflow from self. + +The subject of culture has been brought before the public of late, by +Professor Huxley, and Matthew Arnold, and Mr. Shairp. I do not propose +to enter into the questions which have engaged their able pens, but to +go back to those primary and foundation principles, which I have +proposed to consider--the one of which is the centre, and the other, the +circumference of human culture,--Selfhood and Sacrifice. + +It is the object of this course of lectures, in part at least as I +understand it, to discuss this subject--to discuss, _i.e._ the +principles and grounds, on which right reason and rational Christianity +propose to build up a good and exalted character. Now with regard to +what Christianity teaches, has it never occurred to you, or has it never +seemed to you, in reading the Gospels, that they appeal to +self-interest, to the desire to be saved, in a way that is at variance +with the loftiest motives? But it is appealed to, and therefore is, in +some sense, sanctioned. And yet, as if this self-interest were something +wrong, the prevalence of it in the world, the world's selfishness in +other words, is represented by many preachers, as if it were the sum of +all wickedness, the proof indeed, of total depravity. Here then, it +seems to me, whether we look at Christianity or at the teachings of the +pulpit, there is urgent need of discrimination. And there is another +aspect of the same subject, which seems to require attention; and that +is what is called, individualism--the mentally living, if not for, yet +in and out of ourselves; claiming to find all the springs and forces of +faith and culture within ourselves, to the exclusion of the proper +influence of society, of Christianity, of the whole great realm of the +past, by which we have been trained and formed; individualism, which +says, "I belong to myself, and to nobody else, and do not choose to be +brought or organized into any system of faith or action with anybody +else." This, indeed, is an extreme to which, perhaps, but few minds go; +but there is a tendency of this kind, which needs to be looked into. + +Now there is a way of thinking, in matters of practical expediency, to +which I confess that I am committed by my life-long reflections; and +which has always prevented me from going to the extreme with any party, +whether in reforms, in politics, in religious systems, or in any thing +else; and that is, to look to the mean in things; to look upon human +nature and human culture, as held in the balance between opposing +principles. With this view, I shall first undertake to show that the +principle of self-regard, or of individualism, is right and lawful--is +indeed, an essential principle of culture. + +There is a remarkable passage in the old "Theologia Germanica," which +hits, I think, the very point in this matter of self-regard. Speaking of +its highest man, it says, "All thought of self, all self-seeking, +self-will, and what cometh thereof, must be utterly lost, surrendered +and given over to God, _except in so far as they are necessary to make +up a person_." This personality, this stand-point, we must hold to, go +where we will. + +But let me state more precisely what it is, that is here conceded, and +must be maintained; and why it is important to defend and justify it. I +call it selfhood; and the word, I conceive, is philosophically necessary +to meet the case. Because it is a principle, that goes behind +selfishness; and of which selfishness is the excess and abuse. +Selfishness calculates, overreaches, circumvents. But selfhood is +simpler. It is the instinctive, instantaneous, uncalculating rush of our +faculties, to preserve, protect and help ourselves. Selfishness proposes +to take advantage of others; selfhood only to take care of itself. It is +not, as a principle of our nature, a depraved instinct; animals possess +it. It is not moral, or immoral, but simply unmoral. It is a simple +force, necessary to our self-preservation, to our individuality, to our +personality. The highest moral natures feel it as well as the lowest. +The martyr, who gives up every thing else, holds his integrity fast and +dear. It is written of the great Martyr, that, "for the joy that was set +before him, he endured the cross, despising the shame." No being that +is not an idiot, can be divested of all care and regard for himself. And +not only does necessity enforce, but justice defends the principle. If +happiness is a good, and there are two equal amounts of it, the one of +which is mine, and the other my neighbor's, I may in strict justice, +value and desire my own as much as his. If I love his more than my own, +I go beyond the commandment. It is not worth while to put any Utopian +strain upon the bond of virtue; nay, it does positive harm. + +Yet this is constantly done; to the injury of virtue, of conscience, and +of a proper self-respect. In our theories of culture, we demand of +ourselves, what is impossible, what is unjust to ourselves, what +repudiates a part of the very nature we would cultivate. We demand of +ourselves, and we suppose that Christianity demands of us, a certain +unattainable perfection,--or what we call perfection,--a sinking of +ourselves out of sight, and an absorption into the love of God and men, +quite beyond our reach: and failing of that--thinking it entirely out of +our sphere, we give up the proper rational endeavor to be Christians. We +make the highest virtue something exceptional, instead of regarding it +as a prize for us all. We imagine that some few have attained it; that +Jesus did, and that a few persons, denominated _saints_, have approached +him; but that for the common run of men, this is all out of the +question. The fact is, that Christianity is regarded by many, as an +enigma, a secret of the initiated, as an idle vision or hard +exaction--not as a rational culture. Listen to the conversation of the +mart or the drawing-room, you will find that the high Christian law is +but a mocking dream in their eyes. "Giving to him that asketh, and from +him that would borrow, turning not away, and to him that takes from us +our coat, giving our cloak also; and turning the other cheek to the +smiter;"--what is this, they say, but extravagance and fanaticism? As if +they did not know that there is such a figure of speech as hyperbole; +and that it was perfectly natural, in a society where the poor and the +weak were trodden under foot, for the greatest heart that ever was, thus +to pour out itself in pleadings for sympathy, commiseration and +kindness. But the same Master said, "It is profitable for thee--it is +better for thee," to have some of thy pleasures cut off--thine offending +hand or eye; rather _that_, than to have thy whole being whelmed in +misery. + +It is really necessary in this matter, not only to vindicate +Christianity as a reasonable religion, but to vindicate human nature to +itself; to save it from the abjectness of feeling that the necessity of +self-help is an ignoble necessity. Men say, "Yes, we are all selfish, we +are all bad;" and they sink into discouragement or apathy, under that +view. + +The conditions of true culture are attracting increased attention at the +present time; and it is natural that they should, when men's minds are +getting rid of theologic definitions and assumptions, and are coming to +take broad and manly views of the subject. I am endeavoring to make my +humble contribution to it; and with this view, to show, in the first +place, what part our very selfhood, both of right and of necessity, has +in it. + +This principle lies in the very roots of our being; and it is developed +earliest in our nature. Before the love of right, of virtue, of truth, +appears this self-regard. Disinterestedness is of later growth. Infancy +comes into the world like a royal heir, and takes possession, as if the +world were made for itself alone. Itself is all it knows; it will by and +by, take a wider range. There is a natural process of improvement in the +very progress of life. "You will get better," says a dramatic +satirist,[7] "as you get older; all men do. They are worst in childhood, +improve in manhood, and get ready, in old age, for another world. Youth +with its beauty and grace, would seem bestowed on us, for some such +reason, as to make us partly endurable, till we have time to become so +of ourselves, without their aid, when they leave us. The sweetest child +we all smile on, for his pleasant want of the whole world to break up, +or suck in his mouth, seeing no other good in it--would be roughly +handled by that world's inhabitants, if he retained those angelic, +infantile desires, when he has grown six feet high, black and bearded; +but little by little, he sees fit to forego claim after claim on the +world, puts up with a less and less share of its good as his proper +portion, and when the octogenarian asks barely for a sup of gruel or a +fire of dry sticks, and thanks you as for his full allowance and right +in the common good of life,--hoping nobody will murder him--he who began +by asking and expecting the whole world to bow down in worship to +him--why, I say, he is advanced far onward, very far, nearly out of +sight." + +[Footnote 7: Browning: A Soul's Tragedy, p. 250.] + +This advancement, thus springing out of the very experience of life, I +am yet to consider, and have it most at heart to consider. It is of such +priceless worth, it so embraces all that is noble in humanity, that the +importance of the opposite principle, is liable to be quite overlooked. +Selfishness, which is the excess of a just self-regard, is the one form +of all evil in the world. The world cries out upon it, and heaps upon it +every epithet, expressive of meanness, baseness and guilt. And let it +bear the branding scorn; but let us not fail to see, though selfishness +be the satirist's mark, and the philosopher's reproach, and the +theologian's argument, the real nature and value of the principle, from +which it proceeds. + +Selfhood I have preferred to call it; self-love, be it, if you please. +It is that, which satire and false criticism have misconstrued, when +they have said that love of kindred, of friends, of country, of God +himself, is but self-love. The mistake arises from that primal and vital +part and participation which ourself has in every thing that we enjoy or +love or adore. This magnificent _I_--and I emphasize it, because all +meanness is thought to be concentred in that word--this mysterious and +magnificent _I_--this that one means, when he says I--we may utter, but +can never explain, nor fully express it. There are great men in the +world, whose lives are of far more importance than mine--statesmen, +commanders, kings--but _I_--no being can feel an intenser interest in +his individuality than I do in mine; no being can be of more importance +to himself than I am to myself; the very poles of thought and being turn +upon that slender line; that simple unity, like the unit in figures, +swells to infinite multiplication; that one letter, that single stroke +of pen or type, may be varied and complicated, till it writes the +history of the world. "I think, therefore I am," said the philosopher; +but the bare utterance of the word I, yields a vaster inference. No +animal ever knew what that word means. It is some time before the little +child learns to say, I. It says, "Willy or Ellen wants this or +that--will go here or there." What is insanity, but the wreck of this +personality? The victim loses himself. And the morally insane, the +prodigal, when he returns to reason and virtue, comes to himself. + +"A man's self," says Thackeray, "must always be serious to him, under +whatever mask or disguise or uniform he presents it to the public." Yes, +though it were as mime, harlequin, jester fool almost; nor could there +be a more deplorable or desperate condition for a human being, than to +account himself nothing, or nothing worth, or worthy only to be the butt +of universal scorn and contempt. From this utter ruin, every man is +protected by that mysterious and momentous personality that dwells +within him. We may be little in comparison with the general mass of +interests, little in comparison with kingdoms, little in comparison with +the swelling grandeur of thrones and empires, little in comparison with +the great orb that rolls round the sun, and bears millions of such; but +we are forever great in the sense of individual destiny. _This_ swells +beyond kingships, grandeurs, empires, worlds, to infinitude and +eternity. + +There is another element in this selfhood, to be considered, besides its +conscious importance, and that is free will--itself also unmoral, but +indispensable. For imagine a rational being to be placed in this world, +_without_ free will. He can choose neither wrong nor right. He has a +conscience, but no freedom; no power to choose any thing. It is, I +think, an incongruous and impossible kind of existence; but imagine it. +Evils, troubles, temptations press against this being, and he can do +nothing; he cannot even will to resist. Could there be a condition more +horrible? No; man is a nobler and happier being than this amounts to. +Free will is put in him, on purpose to fight the great battle against +evil. He could not fight, if he could not will. He could not choose the +right, without being free to choose the wrong; for choosing one path +without being at liberty to take the other, would be no choosing. Free +will is to fight the battle. It is a glorious prerogative. And man, I +believe, is out of all proportion, happier, with this power, all its +aberrations included, than he would be without it. I am glad for my +part, that I am not passing through this world, like a car on a +railroad, or turning round like a wheel in a mill; that I can go, this +way or that, take one path or another; that I can read, or write, or +study, or labor, or do business; and that when the great trial-hour, +between right and wrong, comes, though I may choose the wrong, yet that +I _can_ choose the right. What better would there be for me than +this--what better constitution of a rational nature? I know of no better +possible. + +Selfhood, then--this interest in ourselves, being seen to be right, and +the play of free will which is a part of it desirable; let us turn +finally to the useful working of the principle. You may have said in +listening to me thus far, "What need of insisting so much upon +self-regard, which we all perfectly well understand?" I doubt whether it +is so well understood; and this must be my apology. We have seen that +the principle is native and necessary to us; let us look a moment, at +its utility. + +I am put in charge of myself--of my life, first of all. So strong is the +impulse to keep and defend it, that self-preservation has been called +the first law of our being. But that argues an antecedent +fact--self-appreciation. Why preserve that which we value not? We +defend ourself, because we prize ourself. We defend our life, with the +instant rush of all our faculties to the rescue. "Very selfish," one may +say; "And why does a man care so much for himself; he isn't worth it." +He can't help it. He obeys the primal bond; he is a law to himself. Is +it not well? Man's life would perish in a thousand ways, if he did not +thus care for it. The great, universal and most effective guardianship +over human life everywhere, is--not government nor law, not guns nor +battlements, not sympathy, not society--but this self-care. + +I am put in charge of my own comfort, of my sustenance. I must provide +for it. And to provide for it, I must have property--house, land, +stores, means--something that must be my own, and not another's. If I +were an animal, I might find food and shelter in the common storehouse +of nature's bounty. But I have other wants; if I have no provision for +them that is my own; if some godless International League, or Agrarian +Law, could break down all the rights of property, there would be an end +to industry, to order, to comfort, and eventually to life itself. +Whatever evils, whatever monstrous crimes come of the love of gain, its +extinction would be infinitely worse. + +I am put in charge of my good name, my place among men. I must regard +it. I am sinking to recklessness about virtue if I cease to value +approbation. Even the martyr, looking to God alone, seeks approval. And +good men's approbation is the reflection of that. To seek honor from men +at the expense of principle, is what the Master condemns--not the desire +of honor. It has been made a question whether the love of approbation +should be appealed to, in schools. It cannot be kept out, from there, +nor from anywhere else. If it could, if the vast network of social +regards, in which men are now held, were torn asunder, society would +fall to pieces. + +Finally, I am put in charge of my virtue--of that above all. And that I +must get and keep for myself; no other can do it for me. Another may +stretch out the hand to defend me from a fatal blow; another may endow +me with wealth; another may give me the praise I do not deserve; but no +friendly intervention, no deed of gift, no flattery, no falsity, can +give me inward truth and integrity. That solemn point in human +experience, that question upon which every thing hangs--shall I do +right?--or shall I do wrong?--is shrouded in the secrecy and silence of +my own mind. All the power in the world, cannot do for me the thing that +I must do for myself. To me, to me, the decision is committed. + +Now what I have been saying, is this; it is well that that self-regard, +upon which so much is devolved, should be strong; that there should be +no apathy, no indifference, upon this point; that if ever a man wanders +away into recklessness, into idleness, into disgrace, into utter moral +delinquency and lawlessness, he should be brought to a stand, and +brought back again, if possible, by this intense and uncontrollable +regard for himself--for his own well-being. I do not resolve every thing +in human nature, into the desire of well being. I do not say that the +love of life, of property, of reputation, still less of virtue, is the +same as the love of happiness; but I say that to the pursuit of all +these a man is urged, driven, almost forced, by this love of his own +well-being; nay more to the pursuit of the highest eventually, and that, +by the very laws of his nature. + +Let us now turn to the other principle which I propose to discuss--that +which opens the whole field of our culture--the principle that carries +us out of, and beyond ourselves. + +It has been no part of my design, in discussing the principle of +selfhood, to show the hinderance to culture, and the evil every way, +that come from the abuse of it. That will be sufficiently manifest, if +it be made to appear, that all culture and happiness are found in the +opposite direction. But if I wanted to put this in the strongest light, +I should point to the pain and obstruction which are experienced in a +diseased self-consciousness. It would be a powerful argument for that +going out of self, which I am about to speak of. Self, if it is a +necessary stand-point, is yet liable to be always in our way. A morbid +anxiety about our position, our credit with men, the good or ill opinion +others have of our talents, tastes or merits, causes more misery, I am +inclined to think, than any other form of human selfishness. See a +company of persons, inthralled with music, charmed by eloquence, +transported by some heroic action set before them; and they forget +themselves; they do not think, how they look, how they are dressed, what +others think of them, in their common delight. + +The sense of this, I believe it was, that lay at the bottom of the old +Buddhist doctrine of Nirwana--_i.e._, self-oblivion. To lose this +wearisome, diseased self, seemed to Gautama, the great apostle of +Buddhism, to be the chief good. Nirwana has been taken to mean absolute +annihilation. I do not believe the Buddhists meant that; for to me, it +is incredible, that any great sect, numbering millions, should have so +totally given up the natural love of existence, and desire of +immortality; and Max Müller and others have brought that construction +of the Buddhist creed, into doubt. Individuals may go that length. +Unhappy Blanco White, tortured in body and mind, could say that he +desired no more of life, here or hereafter. A German naturalist could +say, "Blessed be the death hour--the time when I shall cease to be." But +this revolt against self and very self-existence, whether ancient or +modern, I advert to, only to show the necessity of going out from it, in +order to build up the kingdom of God within us. It is notable; it is +suggestive; but it is neither healthy, nor true to human nature. Far +truer is that admirable little poem of David Wasson's, originally +entitled "Bugle Notes," which in unfolding the blessing and joy of +existence, touches, I think, the deepest and divinest sense of things. + +But let us proceed to consider the law of sacrifice--not sacrifice of +happiness nor improvement, but the finding of both, in going out from +self, to that which is beyond and above it. + +A man's thought starts from himself; but if it stopped there, he would +be nothing. All philosophy, science, knowledge presuppose certain +original faculties and intuitions; but not to cultivate or carry them +out, would leave their possessor to be the mere root or germ of a man. A +line in geometry presupposes a point; but unless the point is extended, +there can be no geometry; it is a point barren of all science, of all +culture. + +Every intellectual step is a step out of one's self. The philosopher who +studies _himself_, that he may understand his own mind and nature, is +but studying himself objectively; his very self _then_ lies out of +himself, and is an abstraction to him. And the mathematician, the +astronomer, the naturalist, the poet, the artist, each one goes out of +himself. His subject, his theorem, his picture it is, that draws +him--not reward, not reputation. Doubtless Newton or Herschel, when he +left his diagram or his telescope, and seated himself in the bosom of +his family, might say, "We must live; I must have income; and if public +or private men offer to remunerate and sustain me, it is right that they +should do so." But the moment he plunges into deep philosophic +meditation, he forgets all that. Nature has more than a bridal charm, +science more than golden treasures, truth more than pontifical +authority, to its votaries. Not wooing, but worship, is found at its +shrines and altars. In the grand hierarchies of science, of literature, +of art, there is a veritable priesthood, as pure, as unworldly, as can +be found in any church. It is delightful to look upon its work, upon its +calm and loving enthusiasm. The naturalist brings under his microscope, +the smallest and most unattractive specimen of organized matter, and +goes into ecstasies over it, that might seem ridiculous; but no, this is +a piece of _holy nature_--a link in the chain of its majestic harmonies. + +And so every intellectual laborer, when his work is noblest, forgets +himself--the lawyer in his case, the preacher in his sermon, the +physician in his patient. Is it not true then, and is it not noteworthy, +that all the intellectual treasures that are gathered to form the +noblest humanity, all the intellectual forces that are bearing it +onward, come of self-forgetting? + +Equally true is it--more true if possible, in the moral field. The man +who is revolving around himself, must move in a very small circle. +Vanity, self-conceit, thinking much of one's self, may be the foible of +some able and learned men, but never of the greatest men: because the +wider is the circle of a man's thought or knowledge, at the more points +does he see and feel his limitations. Vanity is always professional, +never philosophic. It belongs to a narrow, technical, never to the +largest, moral culture. And all the moral _forces_ in the world, are +strongest, divinest, when clearest of self. When the public man seeks +his own advancement, more than the public weal, he is no more a +statesman, but a mere politician; and when the reformer cares more for +his own opinion than for the end to be gained, the people will not +regard nor respect him. The world may be very selfish, but it will have +honesty in those whom it permits to serve it. + +The truth is that the whole culture of the world, is built on sacrifice; +and all the nobleness in the world lies in that. To show that, it is +only necessary to point to those classes of men and spheres of action, +which exert the widest influence upon the improvement and welfare of +mankind. They will all be found to bear that mark. + +Look, first, at the professional teachers of the world--the authors, +artists, professors, schoolmasters, clergymen. In returns of worldly +goods, their services have been paid less, than any other equal ability +and accomplishment in the world. Doubtless there have been exceptions; +some English bishops and Roman prelates have been rich; and some authors +and artists have gained a modest competence. More are doing it now, and +yet more will. But the great body of intellectual laborers, has been +poor. The instruction of the world, has been carried on by perpetual +sacrifice. A grand army of teachers--authors, artists, schoolmasters, +professors, heads of colleges--have been through ages, carrying on the +war against ignorance; but no triumphal procession has been decreed to +it; no spoils of conquered provinces have come to its coffers; no crown +imperial has invested with pomp and power. In lonely watch-towers the +fires of genius have burned, but to waste and consume the lamp of life, +while they gave light to the world. + +It is no answer to say that the victims of intellectual toil, broken +down in health or fortune, have counted their work, a privilege and joy. +As well deny the martyr's sacrifice, because he has joyed in his +integrity. And many of the world's intellectual benefactors, have been +martyrs. Socrates died in prison, as a public malefactor; for the +healing wisdom he offered his people, deadly poison was the reward. +Homer had a lot so obscure, at least, that nobody knew his birthplace; +and indeed some modern critics are denying that there ever was any +Homer. Plato travelled back and forth from his home in Athens to the +court of the Syracusan tyrant, regarded indeed and feared, but +persecuted and in peril of life; nay, and once sold for a slave. Cicero +shared a worse fate. Dante, all his life knew, as he expressed it,-- + + "How salt was a stranger's bread, + How hard the path still up and down to tread, + A stranger's stairs." + +Copernicus and Galileo found science no more profitable than Dante found +poetry. Shakspeare had a home; but too poorly endowed to stand long in +his name, after he left it; the income upon which he retired was barely +two or three hundred pounds a year; and so little did his contemporaries +know or think of him, that the critics hunt in vain for the details of +his private life. "The mighty space of his large honors," shrinks to an +obscure myth of a life in theatres of London or on the banks of the +Avon. + +I might go on to speak, but it needs not, of the noble philanthropists +and missionaries, often spoken of lightly in these days, because what is +noblest must endure the severest criticism; of inventors, seldom +rewarded for their sagacity and the immense benefits they have conferred +upon the world; of soldiers, our own especially, buried by thousands, in +unknown graves--green, would we fain say, green forever be the mounds +that cover them! Let processions of men and women and children, every +year, bring flowers, bring garlands of honor, to their lowly tombs! + +But there is another form of self-consecration which is yet more +essential, and which is universal. And yet _because_ it is essential and +universal, the very life-spring of the world's growth; because it is no +signal benefit, but the common blessing of our existence; because it +moulds our unconscious infancy, and mingles with our thoughtless +childhood, and is an incorporate part of our being, it is apt to be +overlooked and forgotten. The sap that flows up through the roots of the +world--it is out of sight. The stately growths we _see_; the trees that +drop balsam and healing upon the nations, we _see_; the schools, the +universities, the hospitals, which beneficence has builded, we _see_; +but the stream that, through all ages, is flowing from sire to son, is a +hidden current. + +It is one of the miracles of the world--this life that is forever +losing, merging itself in a new life. We talk of martyrdoms; but there +are ten thousands of martyrdoms, of which the world never hears. +Beautiful it is to die for our country; beautiful it is to surrender +life for the cause of religious freedom; beautiful to _go forth_, to +bear help and healing to the sick, the wounded, the outcast and forlorn; +but there are those who _stay at home_, alone, unknown, uncelebrated, to +do and to bear more than is ever done, in one brief act of heroism or +hour of martyrdom. In ten thousand homes are those, whose life-long care +and anxiety wear and waste them to the grave. They count it no praise; +they consider it no sacrifice. I speak not, but for the simple truth, of +that which to me, is too holy for eulogy. But meet it is, that a +generation coming into life, which owes its training and culture and +preservation to a generation that is passing away, should be sensible of +this truth--of this solemn mystery of Providence--of this law of +sacrifice, of this outflow from self into domestic, into social life, +which lies at the very roots of the world. + +There is one further application of the principle of disinterestedness, +which goes beyond classes and instances such as I have mentioned, and +embraces men simply as fellow-men. Much has been said among us of late +years, and none too much, of the dangers of an extreme individualism. We +began as a religious body, in a strong assertion of the rights of +individual opinion; and we went on in that spirit for a considerable +time; till it seemed, at length, as if we were liable to lose all +coherence and to fall to pieces in utter disintegration. But a few years +ago, moving in that zig-zag line which marks all human progress, we +awoke to the dangers of the situation; and happily found that if we +could not agree upon any technical definition of Christian faith, we +_could_ combine for Christian work. The National Conference was formed; +a new impulse was given; new funds were poured into our treasury; we are +circulating books and tracts more widely than we have ever done before; +we are helping feeble churches and founding new ones, besides doing +something for missions abroad: in short, we are trying to do the work +which, in common with other Christian communions, properly belongs to +us. + +But there is another movement, which I regard with equal interest, and +which promises in fact, to go deeper than any thing else we can do. I +allude to those Unions, in which, I think the city of Providence leads +the way: and in which New Bedford, Worcester, and Brooklyn have followed +the example. These associations provide a public room or rooms, well +lighted and warmed, for those who will, to resort to them; but +especially for the young, who most need good culture, entertainment and +encouragement; and in these rooms are found books, pictures, games, and +music perhaps; and classes for regular instruction may be formed, and +lectures occasionally given, or discussions held; in fact, whatever will +contribute to the general improvement and to the pleasant and profitable +passing of social evenings, may be introduced. This kind of institution +is especially adapted to our smaller cities; and may be extended to our +country villages. Our people in the country, live too much apart and +alone; and besides the direct advantages of these gatherings together, a +mutual acquaintance and a kindly feeling would be promoted, which are of +scarcely less importance. + +Let me add that there is a new ideal of life, which, I think, is slowly +arising among us; and which, when it is fully carried out, I believe, +will make an impression upon society, never before seen in the world. +This is the idea of mutual helpfulness; of every man's living not to +himself, but to God, in loving and helping his kind. Helpfulness, I +say--that which Mr. Ruskin describes as the most glorious attribute of +God himself; and which has so seized upon his imagination, that he +ventures to substitute for "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord," Helpful, +helpful, helpful, is the Lord God Almighty! This will not do; but it +indicates a glorious tendency of modern thought. The old ideal of life +has been, to get together the means of comfort and enjoyment; to get +wealth, to get a fine house, to get luxuries for wassail and feasting, +or to get books and pictures; and then to sit down and enjoy all this +good estate, and transmit it to fortunate heirs, with little thought of +others--with some charities perhaps, but without taking into heart or +life, the common weal, happiness and improvement of all around. + +What a millennium would it begin, if, instead of this, every man should +be thinking, just so far as he can go beyond taking care of his own body +and soul, what he can do for others--not in any merely eleemosynary way; +not merely to instruct and improve men, with the pharisaic assumption of +being better or better off than they; but by acting a brotherly part +towards them, speaking neighborly words, doing neighborly deeds, +smoothing the path, softening the lot, seeing all erring and sorrow, and +joy and worth, as if they were their own; and wherever there is any +difficulty or trial or need, to "lend a hand." Whenever such a spirit +enters into and pervades society, it will make a world, compared with +which, _our_ time will sink back among the dark ages. + +In short, when is it, that a man does and is, the highest that he is +capable of? The answer is, when forgetting himself, forgetting +advantage, gain, praise, fame, he pours himself out, in intellectual or +moral, and, any way, beneficent activity. When does culture or art in +him attain to the highest? It is when going beyond all thoughts of +culture and art, he flings himself, in perfect sympathy and free +communion, into the great mass of human interests. It is so that the +greatest things have been achieved in all the higher fields of human +effort--in writing, in eloquence, in painting and sculpture and music; +and it is so, especially, that the doers of great things, have become +the noblest men. "Art for art's sake," has been the motto for culture, +with some. And to a certain extent, that is true. It is fine to work for +the perfection of the work, and without any intrusion of self. But a man +may work so, upon a theme of little or no significance to the world's +improvement or welfare. He may work so, with small thoughts, small +ideals, for which nobody cares, or has any reason to care. But so can he +not work grandly, however finished be the result. Art is for the sake of +something beyond itself. Only when it goes out into great ideals that +mingle themselves with the widest culture and improvement of men, only +when it strikes for the right, for liberty, for country, for the common +weal, does it achieve its end. + +We have had literature enough, and have it now, in which the writer +seems hardly to go beyond himself--writing out of himself and into +himself--occupied with making fine sentences, without any earnest +intent; and which readers, used to feed upon the honest bread of plain +English speech, hardly know what to make of. Very fine, these sparkling +sentences may be, very beautiful, very apt to strike with admiration; +but they divert attention with surprises, or cover up thought with +coruscations. They are like gems that lie scattered upon the table; they +are not wrought into any well-woven fabric; they do not move _on_ the +subject to any conclusion. + +Men may win great admiration and great fame, but not great love; though +they gain, perhaps, as much as they give. Only by writing out of the +bosom of a great humanity _to_ the great humanity, can one fill the +measure of good art or good culture. Even Goethe, of whom Professor +Seeley says, that "he found every thing interesting except the fact that +Napoleon was trampling upon Germany"--a fatal exception: even Goethe, +with all his art, his marvellous versatility and fine accomplishment, +failed to reach the highest place, either in the best self-culture, or +in men's best love. _Savant_, poet, novelist, of high mark, as he was, +he has no such place as Newton, Wordsworth, and Walter Scott, in men's +love. Schiller and Richter, I believe, are more beloved in Germany, than +Goethe. + +In mere art, in perfection of style, no writers have equalled Homer and +Shakspeare. But _they_ did not say, "Art for art's sake." They had no +thought but to communicate their thought. If singular felicities appear +in their style, little eddyings of exquisitely turned conceits, as +especially in Shakspeare, they made a part of, and swept on the strong +current of their ideas. They were not introduced for their own sake, or +merely to please the writer. + +It has been said that great authors are born of great occasions. Some +remarkable era, some turn or tide in human thought, or in human affairs, +have borne them on to their supreme greatness. Will not the time come, +when men shall so look into the depths of the human heart, into the +tragic or blissful experiences of all human life, that no great era +shall be necessary to make great writers? + +I believe it. I believe in a perpetual human progress--progress in every +kind, material, mental, moral, religious, divine; and I greatly desire +to say a few words in close, if you will indulge me upon this point. For +I found this faith in progress, on the two principles which I have been +considering in this lecture. Selfhood obliges a man to take care of +himself. To go out of himself is the only way, in which he can +take care of himself--can take care, that is to say, of his own +improvement and happiness. In selfhood, necessary as it is, there is +no virtue, and little joy. Outflow from it--love, generosity, +disinterestedness--embraces the whole sphere of our culture and welfare. + +Can there be any doubt upon either of these points--either the culture +or welfare? + +Upon the culture, I say; upon what makes for human improvement. There is +evil enough in the world; but what nation or age ever approved of it? +What people ever praised selfishness, injustice, falsifying of speech or +trust? No literature ever celebrated them. No religion ever enjoined +them. No laws ever enacted them. Imagine a law that proposed to reward +villains and to punish honest men. The world would spit upon it. Imagine +a book or essay or poem or oration, that plainly set about to tell what +a beautiful and noble thing it is, to lie, to defraud, to wrong, +corrupt, and ruin our fellows. No man ever had the face to do such a +thing. No; books may have taught such things, but they never taught them +as noble things. The man never lived, that would stand up and say, "It +is a glorious thing to betray trust, or to ruin one's country, or to +blaspheme God." Men do such things, but they don't reverence nor respect +themselves for doing them. + +This then being settled--and it is a stupendous fact--the right +principle about culture, being thus set up, high and irrepealable in the +human conscience and in the sentiments of all mankind--what says the +common judgment of men about the happiness or misery of following the +right? Does it say--"It is a blessed thing to be a bad man; it is good +and wise to be a base or cruel man." Does it say--"Happy is the miser, +the knave, the drunkard." No, it does not. There is temptation to do +wrong; _that_ all know; there is a notion that it may promote some +temporary interest or pleasure; there is a disposition in many, to +prefer some sensual gratification to the purer satisfactions of the +higher nature; but there is, at the same time, a deep-founded +conviction, that misery in the long run must follow sin; that the +everlasting law of God has so ordained it to _be_; and that only the +pure, the noble, the heroic, the good and godlike affections can ever +make such a nature as ours, content and happy. + +Here then is another stupendous principle settled. And now, I say, this +being is a lover of happiness. He is not wise; he is not clear-seeing; +he is not good either--_i.e._, he is not fixedly and determinately good; +he is weak too; he is easily misled; he is often rebellious to the +higher laws of his nature; but--I hold to that--he is a lover of +happiness; and happiness, he knows, can never be found, but in obedience +to those higher laws. He is a lover of happiness, I say; he cannot be +worse off, without wishing to be better off; if he is sick, he wants to +be well; if his roof lets in the rain, he will have it repaired; if the +meanest implement he uses, is broken, he will have it mended. Is it not +natural--is it not inevitable, that this tendency should yet develop +itself in the higher concerns of his being? Is it not in the natural +order of things, that the higher should at length gain the ascendency +over the lower, the stronger over the weaker, the nobler over the +meaner? How can it be thought--how can it _be_, in the realm of Infinite +Beneficence and Wisdom, that meanness and vileness, sin and ruin should +be strong and prevail, and gain victory upon victory, and spread curse +beyond curse, and draw their dark trail over the bright eternity of +ages! + +No, in the order of things, this cannot be. Grant that there are evils, +difficulties, obstacles in the way. But in the order of things, +principles do not give way before temporary disturbances. Law does not +yield to confusion. Gravitation binds the earth, notwithstanding all the +turmoil upon its bosom. Light prevails over darkness, though cloud and +storm and night interrupt its course. The _moral_ turmoil upon earth's +bosom, war and outbreak and widespread disaster, the cloud and storm and +darkness of human passions and vices, the bitter struggles and sorrows +of humanity, the dark shadows of earthly strife and pain and sin, are +yet to give place to immutable law, to all-conquering might and right, +to everlasting day. + +I am as sure of it, as I am of the being of God--as I am of my own +being. The principles of progress are laid in human nature. If man did +not care for himself, I should have no hope of him. If he could not go +out from himself, and find therein his improvement, virtue and +happiness, I should have no hope of him. But these two principles yoked +together, in the Heaven-ordained frame of our being, will draw on to +victory. + + + + +THE RELATION OF JESUS + +TO THE + +PRESENT AGE. + +By CHARLES CARROLL EVERETT. + + +The writer to the Hebrews affirms that Jesus Christ is "the same +yesterday, to-day, and for ever." Paul exclaims to the Corinthians, +"Though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we +him no more." Christ was the same; yet before the generation that he +left upon the earth had passed away his relation to the earth had +changed. Thus does the work of Christ shape itself afresh to meet the +needs of every generation. Compare together the Christ of the first +century, the Christ of the thirteenth, the Christ of the sixteenth, and +the Christ of the nineteenth centuries, and you would hardly think they +all represent the same personality. Christ is always the same. His work +is always substantially the same; but because the ages change, the +method of this work changes. The same needs always exist in the heart of +humanity, but in different ages these needs manifest themselves in +different ways, and are to be met by different instrumentalities. And, +further, it is not merely because the needs of humanity continually +change their aspect that the work of Christ is ever changing. No age is +a recipient alone. There is no action without reaction Each age +contributes something to the work of Christ. It adds new forces, new +methods, new machinery. Its spirit, and by this I mean its real, vital, +energizing spirit, becomes united with the spirit of Christ, as it is +present and active in the world. + +In considering the relation of Christ to the present age, we have then +to consider it under two aspects. We have to consider each as a giver, +and each as a receiver. We may help to make this double relation clear +by saying that Christ is present to this nineteenth century at once as a +problem and as a power. No questions have stirred more deeply the heart +of the age than those which have to do with the person and the office of +Christ. The answers to these questions shape the aspect in which he +stands to the age, and become therefore parts and elements of the power +by which he acts upon the world. But this statement does not exhaust the +twofold relation of which I speak. That which the age gives to Christ is +not merely its thought about him. The secular thought and life of the +age bring their contribution, they are themselves a contribution to him. +They furnish one part of that complete organism of which Christ +furnishes the other. If the age, in any fundamental forms of its thought +and life, seems to stand in opposition to Christ, this apparent +opposition is only the antithesis of elements which belong together. If +what we call the spirit of the age seems, in any respect, to stand in +opposition to the spirit of Christ, this only shows the need that each +has of the other. The spirit of this nineteenth century needs the spirit +of Christ, and the spirit of Christ needs the spirit of this nineteenth +century. It is not then merely that the thought of the age clears away +something of the obscurity and the misconception that have gathered +about the person and the work of Christ. If all he said and did were as +truly comprehended now as they could have been at the first, no less +real, no less important, would be the offering which this age would +bring to him. Neither does the fact, that the work of Christ needs the +work, and that his spirit needs the spirit, of the century in which we +live, necessarily imply any imperfection in his original work, or any +thing originally lacking in his spirit. The question as to what he had +in reserve, as to the limit, or the lack of limit, of his insight and +comprehension, is one that I do not need, and do not intend here to +raise. There is a kind of work that cannot be done all at once. There is +a fulness of spirit that cannot manifest itself all at once. It is +sufficient to know that Christ recognized this fact as well as we can. +He affirmed it as clearly and as confidently as it is possible for us to +do. "I have," he said to his disciples, "yet many things to say unto +you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit, when he, the Spirit of truth, +is come, he shall lead you into all truth." All, so far as we can see, +that it was possible for any spirit to do at one moment, Christ did. He +infused into the world a spirit of love and faith and consecration, a +principle of enthusiasm for humanity. He added to these the vitalizing +power that came from his personality. This he did, and with this he was +forced to be content. He told us the nature of his work, and foretold to +us its history. It was to be as a little leaven which a woman hideth in +a measure of meal till the whole is leavened. He hid in the world the +leaven of his truth. That was all that he could do. It is for us to +witness, and to contribute to, the completion of his work. + +In considering the theme before us, I shall speak, first, of the +external history of Christ, next of his teaching, and finally of his +personality, in their relation to the present age. + +In considering the relation of Christ to the present age, we are met, +then, first by the most external form of this relation. The external +history of Christ, the very framework of many of his highest and purest +teachings, contains elements that are utterly opposed to the habits of +thought which are most peculiar to the present century. I refer to +whatever in the history of Christ implies the exercise of any miraculous +power by him. + +The idea of a miracle is opposed to the fundamental axioms of the +popular thought of the present. The writers who best represent this +thought do not hold it necessary to disprove the fact of miracles. They +simply affirm, with Strauss, that the time is past when a miracle can be +believed. On the other hand, the miraculous is inextricably intertwined +with the history of Christ. We find miracles recognized, not merely in +records the genuineness of which has, with or without reason, been +suspected. In Epistles of Paul, the genuineness of which no critic of +repute has ever dreamed of assailing, the miraculous element is +recognized as distinctly as in the Gospels. We have at least the +testimony of Paul--one of the grandest souls that ever lived, a man whom +we know and honor as we know and honor few--that he believed himself to +have wrought miracles, and that he believed the other apostles had done +and were in the habit of doing the same. And we further have his +testimony, with that of others indorsed by him, in regard to the most +important of the miracles of Jesus; namely, the manifestation by Jesus +of himself to his disciples after his death. + +Here is a collision between the form of the external manifestation of +Christ and the spirit of the age. The age itself has given such +prominence to this that we cannot overlook it. The idea of miracle is so +foreign to the spirit of the age that it has a fascination for it. It +has less importance than any thing else in the history of Jesus, and yet +nothing has more occupied the thoughts of the thinkers of the present +generation. + +For the reasons already stated, we must concede a certain degree of +right to both sides of the great controversy. If we cannot eliminate the +miraculous from the history of Jesus, neither can we, nor would we if we +could, eliminate from the spirit of the age that element which finds it +hard to accept a miracle. The very antagonism between the two, the right +which each maintains being granted, shows the need that each has of the +other. Each has a contribution for the other which could be received +from no other source. + +In the first place, the absolute incredulity with which the most +thorough representatives of the thought of the time receive any story of +the miraculous shows that now, for the first time, a miracle is seen to +be in the truest sense of the word a miracle. To the child or the savage +a miracle is hardly possible. Either every thing is a miracle or nothing +is. It is only as the absoluteness of law is recognized that a miracle, +which is in appearance a violation of this law, begins to produce its +full impression. The present age has placed behind miracle a mighty +background of law. From out this does miracle first stand forth in its +true nature, as something demanding yet defying credence. Those who +blame the spirit of the age for lack of faith in this direction should +at least give it credit for this immense contribution to the idea of +miracle, by which, for the first time, a miracle stands forth absolutely +in its true nature. + +Not only does the spirit of the age thus furnish to miracles the +background that they need: it furnishes to them also a content. The +thought of law does not stop with the background of laws of which I +spoke. Laws may be finite: law is infinite. The miracle sets at defiance +the great background of recognized laws; but itself can be only the +manifestation of some higher, grander, more comprehensive law. Thus does +a miracle more truly than ever before come as a real revelation. For the +first time it has its full and logical meaning. It was before expected +to prove something which from the nature of the case it could not prove. +No miracle, however stupendous, can prove the truth of a principle in +morals. It can show, indeed, some superiority, in some respect, in him +who works the miracle; but this superiority may not be of a nature to +demand implicit confidence towards the person in all respects. It may be +like the superiority of the European over the ignorant savage. The +missionary may win the trust of the simple barbarian by sending a +message written upon a chip; but the sailor, bringing the seeds of all +the vices of civilization, can "make the chip speak" as well as the +missionary. But when the miracle testifies of the comprehensive law +which it manifests, then first does it have a meaning which cannot be +wrested out of it. Nay, then first does it become really sublime. +Before, it was a single meteor flashing in short-lived brightness across +the sky. Now, it is the first manifestation of a vast system of worlds +of which we had not dreamed. Such is the contribution which the spirit +of the age, through the very antagonism of which I spoke, makes to the +miracles which constitute so much of the external form in which Christ +meets it. + +On the other hand, miracle brings a no less important contribution to +the spirit of the age. This spirit tends, not only to look upon law as +absolute, but to look upon the system of laws which it has discovered as +final. These laws tend continually to become narrow and hard. They tend +to become merely a system of physical forces. There is danger that the +spirit may become shut up within these physical laws as in a +prison-house. The miracle demonstrates to the senses that these physical +laws are not absolute, even in their own realm; that these physical +forces are encompassed and interpenetrated by spiritual forces; that +matter is at the last subordinate to spirit. It may not reveal the +nature of these spiritual forces; but it does reveal their presence. All +do not need this demonstration. The same truth may be reached in other +ways. The laws of thought reveal it. The spiritual consciousness may be +sufficient unto itself. Christ himself regarded his miracles as of +comparatively small account. He wrought them because he was moved to use +whatever power he had to bless mankind. If he healed the sick, it was +because he loved to heal them. He sympathized with sorrow and suffering, +and, so far as he could, would remove their cause. But the miracles +carry, as we have seen, their own revelation with them; and they have +their place, however lowly, in regard even to the spiritual +consciousness. The albatross, we are told, with all its magnificent +sweep of wing, cannot lift itself from the flat surface of the deck on +which it may be lying. Just because its wings are so strong and large, +it needs to be lifted a little, that they may have space to move, that +they may have freedom to smite the air. When this freedom has been given +it, then it mounts upward, sustained by its own inherent strength. So is +it, sometimes, with the spirit. It has strength of its own. It has a +self-sustaining power. But it sometimes needs to be lifted a little way +above the dead level of its daily life, above the plane of physical +relations, before its wings find strength and freedom to beat the air. +Then, leaving its temporary support behind it, it mounts in glad flight +heavenward. Such help many have found, and may yet find, in the miracles +of Jesus. The miracle may lift the level surface of life as if into a +wave, from the crest of which the spirit may start upon its flight. + +From the external manifestation of the history of Christ, and the +external relations in which through this he stands to the present age, +we pass to the inner power of this life. Within these external +manifestations we find his teachings. We have, then, next to consider +the relation in which Christ stands to the present age as a teacher. We +shall find here the same twofold relation which we have found before; +and the external may thus stand as a type and illustration of the +internal. We will first consider, under this aspect, the basis and form +of the teaching of Christ, and next its substance. + +The spirit of the age is truth-seeking. We speak often of the eagerness +for wealth that marks the age. I think that when, from the distant +future, men shall look back upon this period of the world's history, the +search for wealth will not be seen to fill the place that to us it seems +to occupy. The age will be seen to be animated by a nobler quest than +this. The search for truth will be seen to be the quest by which it is +marked most really. We speak of the corruption of the age, of the +trickeries of trade, of the unscrupulousness of speculation, of the +pretence and display of fashion, of the venality of politics. All this +is true. These things deserve the denunciation of the moralist and the +preacher. But behind all this is the life which truly marks the age. It +is the life of patient, earnest, honest search for truth. I believe that +never and nowhere has there been manifested, to so great extent, such +conscientious and self-forgetful love of truth for its own sake as may +be found in the scientific investigations of the present day. Such +accuracy of research, such microscopic delicacy of measurement, such +patient and unprejudiced examination, I believe to be unequalled in the +history of man. This proves that, in spite of the frauds and falseness +of which I spoke, the age is really sound at heart. Theologians +sometimes speak of the flippancy and conceit of the science of the day. +The terms would be more true applied in the opposite direction. Theology +is more open to such charges than science. A love of truth that would +fling away even the highest glory of the earth and the hope of heaven, +if so be truth may stand pure and perfect, has something sublime about +it. Well might the theologian take a lesson from the man of science in +regard to this consecration to truth. For theology, with its +presumption, its prejudice, its pretence, its glossing over of +difficulties, its leaning upon authority which it feels at heart is not +authority, its saying what it does not exactly believe, that it may not +contradict those who perhaps do not believe exactly what they say, may +well stand ashamed in the presence of the science of the day that has +left all to follow truth. Theology should give to science not +tolerance, not patronage, but reverence. While it utters fearlessly the +truth that is given it to speak, it should in its turn seat itself as a +learner at the feet of science, and seek not only to gather the facts +which it has to teach, but to catch something of its spirit, the spirit +that loves truth, and that will suffer nothing to take the place of +this. + +But Christ was not a truth-seeker. It does not appear that he ever +doubted or questioned. Pilate asked the question, What is truth? It does +not appear that Jesus ever did. Jesus came not to seek the truth, but to +announce it. "To this end," he cried, "was I born, and for this cause +came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth." He +came to bear witness unto the truth, but it was truth that came to him +without his seeking. Neither does it appear that Christ loved truth +above all things. To the Jesuit there is something better than truth, +and to this he will sacrifice truth itself. I assert nothing like this +in regard to Christ. Truth was to him fundamental and essential. He +would not accept or tolerate what was false. But still to know was not +the great object of his life. There was something better to him than +truth; namely, life. He would rather be than know. At his touch truth +sprang into life. If he came to bear witness to the truth, this was only +a step in his grander work, the work which he proclaimed at the very +beginning of his mission, when he cried, "I am come that they might have +life, and that they might have it more abundantly." And, further, Christ +did not merely teach life through truth: he taught truth through life. +"If any man," he said, "will do his will, he shall know of the +doctrine." And John was full of the spirit of his Master when he cried, +"The life is the light of men." + +We see more clearly the antithesis between Christ as a teacher on the +one side, and the present age on the other, in this fact: viz., that +Christ speaks with authority to an age which rejects authority. The cry +of the age, in the world of the intellect as well as in that of +politics, is for liberty. But to this age, as to every age, Christ comes +as a master. "My yoke," he says, "is easy;" but it is a yoke none the +less. + +If the relation of Christ to his truth is so different from that of the +spirit of the age to its truth, it must follow that the two forms of +truth rest on different bases. The faculties by which the age seeks +truth must be different from those through which the truth came unsought +to Jesus. This age seeks truth by the discriminating and investigating +power of the understanding. Truth came to Jesus through the intuitions +of the soul. In him the moral and spiritual faculties were full of +strength. He lived as naturally in the world of spiritual realities as +other men live in the world of physical realities. As we need only open +our eyes and see, so his spirit had only to open its eyes and it saw. As +the voices of the outward world come to us without our listening for +them, so the voice of God came to him whether he would or no. And this +was the ground of the authority with which he spoke. Whoever speaks from +the moral and spiritual consciousness to the moral and spiritual +consciousness may and must speak with authority. We may illustrate this +by an extreme case. When a man is lurking for the commission of some +crime, or after he has committed it, he feels the mastery of all +innocent things. The rustle of a leaf may excite his dread. To a voice +denouncing his crime, or crime like his, he listens as to the voice of +God. This recognition of the mastery of a higher degree of life after +its own kind is felt at every stage of moral and spiritual development. +If the soul be comparatively guilty, it recognizes this mastery with +dread. If it be comparatively innocent, it recognizes it with joy. Such +was the authority with which Jesus spoke. Though he spoke with +authority, what he said did not rest on this authority. It was the +authority with which the awakened calls to the sleeper, bidding him +awake, for the world is bright with the morning. The voice penetrates to +the obscured consciousness of the sleeper. He stirs himself, he opens +his eyes, and rejoices for himself in the morning brightness. So Christ +called to a sleeping world. Nay, he called to those who were dead in +trespasses and sin, and they that were dead heard the voice of the Son +of Man and lived. + +If the truth taught by Jesus and the truth that is sought by the present +age rest on such different bases, they must be, we should suppose, in +some respects different each from the other. But, if each be truth, they +must be the complements each of the other. And, if they are the +complements each of the other, they must need one another. Each must be +imperfect without the other. Each must find a certain confirmation and +support from the other, and each must complete for the other the circle +of truth. We are thus led to look at some points in the teaching of +Christ, and to see how these complete and are completed by the truth +which the present age seeks and finds. + +In the first place, Christ teaches us of the loving providence of God. +He awakens in our hearts all childlike instincts of trust and +confidence. He tells us that God is our father, that his love watches +over all his children, that it follows the prodigal in his wandering +and greets him on his return, that even a sparrow does not fall to the +earth without it. This teaching is sufficient for the spiritual +necessities of our nature. The spirit that has adopted these principles +into itself will live a strong and blessed life. They have been the +inspiration of the centuries ever since Christ uttered them. They +contain all that could be told of God in the age when Jesus lived. But +they do not exhaust the truth of God. They leave space for +misconception. Love may be universal, and yet be not without caprice. +Providence may watch over all, and yet in every case be only a special +providence. God may watch over every individual of the race, but over +each merely as an individual. If there may be the caprices of love, then +it is not a long step to the possibility of caprices which spring from +the lack of love. Love may alternate with hate. If each individual be +dealt with singly, as though he existed by himself, the step is not a +long one to the thought of discrimination between individuals. The +caprices of love may become favoritism, and the special favor shown to +one implies the neglect of another. All these things are foreign from +the spirit and the teaching of Christ. They contradict the fundamental +principles of his teaching. And yet, men's habits of thought being such +as they were, the teaching of Christ could not be absolutely fortified +against them. He told men that the love of God was like the sunshine +that visits all alike, but the words passed through their ears unheeded. +Thus Christianity all along has been corrupted by misrepresentations of +its truth in which the thought of love had suggested caprice, and the +thought of special love and special providence had suggested the thought +of favoritism, and favoritism had suggested discrimination and neglect. +All men were seen to stand in the presence of God as individuals, which +is true; and merely as individuals, which is false. + +The truth that God is love needs to be supplemented by another truth; +namely this, that God is Law. The great truth of the absoluteness of law +cannot be taught in a single lesson. No man can tell it to another. It +must be demonstrated to be believed. It must be shown in its myriad and +unvarying applications to all forms of being before it can be felt as a +reality. One must see for one's self the grand march of the order of the +universe, the unfailing sequence of cause and effect, the mathematical +exactness of the correlation of all the forces of the world, before one +can have a sense of the truth which lies at the basis and forms the +culmination of scientific thought to-day. This truth has not been +reached suddenly. The ages have been groping after it. This age has +reached, by slow and patient thought, a comprehension of this truth +which is its inspiration. The ages to come will only add to it new +illustrations as they follow its mighty sweep. This truth is what seems +at times to put this age into antagonism with the spirit of Christ. It +is really the offering which the thought of the age brings to Christ. +The teaching of Christ needs, as we have seen, this truth as its +complement. The antithesis between the two shows the intimate +relationship between them. When we bring the two together in one +thought, we have the most sublime conception that ever dawned upon the +mind of man. The truth of Christ finds a body: the truth of the age +finds a soul. On the one side, all possibility of caprice is driven from +our thought of God. The love of God, as strong and tender as the lips +of Jesus could describe it, is seen to be as regular and as calm as the +movements of the heavens. This truth only adds to the strength and the +clearness of our thought of the love of God. We see demonstrated before +us how his care pursues all things, how not a sparrow falls to the earth +unfollowed by this watchful providence, how every grain of dust that +floats in the summer sun has its place and work in the great whole, not +a single mote forgotten. We learn in what direction to look for the +action and succor of this providence. We do not look for it to come to +us in weakness, but in strength. We see that this perfect order is the +truest providence, that the care of each is most perfect that recognizes +each in its relations to all the rest. So soon as we recognize the +divinity of law and the love that is enshrined in it, we feel the +omnipresent might of this divinity, the omnipotence of this love. The +restlessness and passion of our hearts are stilled. Trust in God takes +on the peace and the calmness of the heavens. Such is the offering which +the age brings to Christ. It brings a body in which his spirit may +incarnate itself afresh. + +The result of the union of the thought of the age with the thought of +Christ may be seen in all the relations in which the soul stands to God. +Christ bade his followers preach his gospel to every creature. The age +has taught us the necessity of educating and civilizing the barbarian, +if we would christianize him. Christ taught us to love the sinner while +hating sin. This has seemed to some paradoxical; but the age has removed +some of the difficulty by showing how much of what we call character is +the result of inherited tendencies and outward circumstances. Jesus +taught the doctrine of immortality. Men have tended to look upon the +future life as something standing over against the present. The age +teaches us that such a break in life is impossible, that if there be an +immortality it must lie hidden in the present. It teaches, too, that the +judgments of God, if there be a God, are never arbitrary. He does not +hold blessing in one hand and cursing in another, and give each, by an +outward bestowal, as he may see that it is deserved. Men's acts drag +their consequences after them. Thus the old Scripture phrases are just +coming to their meaning. It is not an angry God that pursues the sinner: +it is his own sin that has found him out. Men do reap the fruit of their +own sowing. There is no scientific truth of the day that stands in any +stronger antagonism to the truth of Christ than is implied in such +antitheses as have been referred to. Even the theories of development, +so rife at present, do not stand in the way of Christ. Christ looks not +downward but upward, not backward but forward. Such theories, if +established, would only show the progressive power of spirit, the +omnipotence of life. + +But if the thought of Jesus needs that of the present age, still more +does the thought of the age need that of Jesus. If the spirit needs a +body, still more does the body need a spirit. The laws, the forces on +which the thought of the age dwells, until this divineness is added to +them are hard and cold. The body, which could carry on all the functions +of its life, yet without life, would be a machine, perfect indeed and +wonderful, but a machine none the less. The thought of the age, taken by +itself, uninspired by Christian truth, tends to drag down the soul, to +imprison it in mere mechanism, to take from it its divine inspiration; +and while we need the thought of the present age to illustrate to us the +methods of God's dealings with the soul, none the less does the thought +of the age need the knowledge that there is a soul. Among all the forces +of the universe, the power of the soul, the culmination of them all, is +apt to be lost sight of. The thought of the age tends to look upon +things from without, and to lose that which is their essence. It needs +the voice that shall awaken its own inner life, and thus bring it to a +consciousness of the life that lies at the heart of all things. + +Thus we see how the thought of Christ and the thought of the age need +and complement each other. The thought of Christ is spiritual, the +thought of the age tends to become material. In this world we are +neither wholly spiritual nor wholly material. And we must bear in mind +that the two elements should not exist over against one another in our +thought. We must not hold the two conceptions, however opposite they may +appear, as two. In life the spirit and the body do not exist as two but +as one. As soon as they exist as two, there is death. So must the truth +of Jesus and the truth of this present age be blended in one thought. We +must not say love and law, but love in law. We must not see the divine +power setting at work forces that by their natural operation shall +reward or punish the spirit. We must see the divine power working in and +through these forces. Then, as science makes us feel that we are +encompassed by law, the words will not need translating to us; for we +shall feel that we are encompassed by God. + +The relation which we have found to exist between the intellectual +teaching of Christ and the thought of the age is no less marked between +the moral teaching of Christ and the life of the age. The moral teaching +of Christ is absolutely true. It is as true as his thought of God; yet +like that it needs its complemental truth. Further, the moral teaching +of Christ needs instrumentalities. Love, however strong, cannot work +without means. The heart needs the hands and the feet. + +In both of these respects the age brings its offering to Christ. Christ +teaches love and self-sacrifice. He bids us do for others as we would +have them do for us. He bids us give to him that asks, and lend to him +that would borrow. These principles are the very life of society. They +are the very truth of God. But yet these principles carried out, without +explanation and qualification, would produce harm as well as good. The +church of every age, in striving to carry out these precepts, has done +much good; but it has done much harm also. It has done good by bringing +succor to the lives that needed it. It has done immeasurable good by +keeping alive on the earth the spirit of Christian love. Men have been +blest by the power of the spirit, even more than by its specific acts of +mercy. But, while it has relieved the poor, it has too often tended to +perpetuate poverty. Indiscriminate alms-giving, mere alms-giving, is the +very mother of pauperism. We see in some Catholic countries how the +alms-giving which the church has taught in the very words of Christ has +degraded whole populations, has taken from manhood its real dignity and +strength. We need, then, not only the principle of love, but also a +knowledge of all social laws. The science of political economy must be +understood; but this, like physical science, cannot be taught in a day. +Ages must teach the lesson. The present age has only half learned it. +But it has learned enough to bring a magnificent contribution to Christ. +Christ bids us help men: the age, in its poor blundering way, is just +beginning to tell us how to help them. It teaches that the best way to +help the poor is to strike at the root of poverty. No less does the age +furnish means for carrying out the principles of Jesus. It brings the +ends of the earth together. Christ bids us love our neighbor. This age +has made those from whom the sea parts us our neighbors. There is +famine, or some more sudden calamity, on the other side of our +continent, or in a foreign land. Christ bids us help those who need. How +shall we carry sudden help unless we hear at once the story? How shall +we send prompt help if there be no strong and swift messenger waiting at +our door? But now the lightning tells the story the moment in which +there is a story to be told, and the unwearied steam bears our gifts as +soon as they can be gathered. The commands of Jesus are absolute. The +power of the age to fulfil these commands is approaching absoluteness. +Thus does the age add to the teaching of Christ the completeness that it +needs. + +But does not the age in turn need this teaching? Materialism and +mechanism in thought are bad enough: they are worse in life. The life of +the age has a tendency to materialism and mechanism. The science of +political economy tends to become a hard system of rules, in which the +spontaneous sympathy of the helper and the individuality of the helped +are lost together. The eagerness of the world after material prosperity +tends to a practical absorption in these ends. Thus we have the greed, +the excitement, the madness, the display, the corruption that to so +great an extent characterize the age. We have seen that there is a +deeper life beneath this superficial one; but these evils, however +superficial, need prompt and constant care lest they eat into the very +heart. The body needs the spirit, or it will sink into decay. + +I have spoken of the two elements which we are considering as if they +stood simply over against one another. This is in some respects true. +The thought and life of the age are, indeed, largely indebted to the +stimulus of Christianity; but they are not, like the painting and +architecture of the Middle Ages, the direct outgrowth of it. The science +of the present day is self-developed and self-sustained. The machinery +of the world has been invented for the world's uses. Its political +economy has been thought out to facilitate its own ends. + +But though the two elements, to some extent, stand over against one +another, yet each, by its natural development, is approaching the other, +and each is becoming penetrated by the other. On the one side, religion +is catching the spirit of the age, and is approaching the clearness and +accuracy of scientific thought. On the other side, science is becoming +conscious of truth which is unattainable by its methods, and which is to +it therefore the unknowable. Already does Herbert Spencer, who +represents the foremost thought of the time, feel the awe of this +mystery, and see gleaming through it something of the presence of the +infinite love. The life of the age, also, by bringing men near to one +another, tends to produce the sense of human brotherhood. Its vast +business enterprise, in some of its aspects, does more for the cause of +humanity than many a professed charity. Further, the age is, to some +extent at least, directly inspired by Christianity. Its zeal for +humanity, its sympathy with the oppressed and suffering everywhere, its +gigantic and unparalleled charities, show it to be more truly Christian +than any age that has preceded it. + +If however, in spite of all this, we are sometimes tempted to doubt +whether the power of the truth which Christ represents is to win the +mastery, or whether it is destined to be lost in the great struggle, we +must remember that its authority is that of elements that are +fundamental in human nature. The spiritual instincts may be repressed: +they cannot be exterminated. As in every little creek and inlet along +the shore the water answers to the call of the ocean, and feels the +might of the outgoing and the incoming tide, so in human life deep +answers unto deep. + +We must remember, too, that Christ is not a mere teacher. His power is +not alone that of the truth he utters. It is no mere accident of history +that the higher truth and life which we have been considering confront +the age as Christian truth and life. They receive a power from their +union with Christ which they could not have received, even had the +thought of men attained to them, without this. We have looked at the +external form of his life and at his teaching in their relation to the +age. There is yet another step to take. There is still an inner reality +to be unveiled. Behind the power of his teaching is the power of his +personality. In this is found the climax of the antithesis in which he +stands to the present. The tendency of the present age is, consciously +or unconsciously, to disown personality. The laws which make the +substance of its thought, the mechanism that makes the framework of its +life, both tend to assert themselves against the power of a free +personality. We may illustrate this by the modern method of warfare. In +ancient times the victory depended on the strength of the individual arm +and the courage of the individual heart. Now it depends more upon the +drill of the army and the clear head of the general. + +This tendency of the thought of the age is not based on error. It brings +to our thought of personality the correction that it needs. The tendency +of the past has been to look upon personality as existing by and for +itself. It has recognized no limits to the power of freedom. Each +individual stood by and for himself in the universe. Now we see a common +element in all lives. All lives are entwined together. We see limits +which freedom cannot pass. We understand something of the limits of each +individual. We understand something of the laws of descent and of the +power of education. Even the personality of Jesus does not stand by +itself as it seemed to once. We see in him the power of the common +nature. We see in him the effect of forces which had been in operation +since the world was. He was no stranger upon the earth. He was the Son +of God, but he was no less the Son of man. He was the flowering of a +nation's history, the flowering of humanity. The flower is drawn forth +by the sun, but it is drawn out from the plant. Even the sun can kindle +the flame of no rose upon the bramble's stalk. While, however, the age +teaches us what is the background out from which the power of +personality stands forth, and what are the elements that are fused +together in it, personality itself remains too much unrecognized. But, I +repeat, the integrity of human nature can never be violated; and +personality is the culmination of human nature. The power of a modern +army, we have seen, depends largely on its drill; yet even here the +impetuous courage of a leader may infuse a life into this vast machine +that shall decide the victory. Mere signals, it is found, upon a ship +will not answer the purpose of communication between the captain and the +men. In times of peril, in the midst of the fury of the storm, the +sailor needs the inspiration of the captain's voice, ringing with a +force that is mightier than the tempest; namely, the force of human will +and courage. No matter how mechanical the age may become, no matter how +the idea of freedom may be eliminated from its thought, the great heart +of humanity beats still in its bosom, and the voice of a strong, free +personality will sooner or later arouse it to an answering +consciousness. The very bands which it sets about personality will make +its power more strongly felt when it is perceived. Its very knowledge of +the elements that are united in it will make it feel more really the +might of the force which can fuse these into one burning point. + +Personality involves three elements. The first is freedom; the second, a +purpose freely chosen; the third, devotion to this purpose. There is no +slavery like sin. Absolute freedom, and thus absolute personality, can +be found only in a nature wholly pure and unselfish. Christ was thus +free. His purpose was the vastest that any human soul has grasped; and +he gave himself to it with all the power of his nature. Thus Christ +possessed the most intense personality ever felt upon the earth. His +teaching came forth glowing with its fire. We feel to-day the effect +which his personality produced upon those who came into direct contact +with it. This influence has propagated itself from age to age. The +Church grew out of it, and its influence is felt to-day far beyond the +limits of the Church. Besides this indirect power of the personality of +Jesus, we may feel its force directly, as we bring ourselves into +personal relation with him. It has not lost its original might. It still +tends to reproduce itself in the present. + +The form in which truth first utters itself has a power which no +subsequent repetition can equal. There is a kind of work that can be +done only once. The first discoverer or announcer of any truth stands in +a relation to it which no other can ever fill. Many navigators have +crossed the sea, but there is only one Columbus. Many astronomers have +searched the heavens, but there has been no second Newton. This fact is +most noticeable in regard to truths that represent not merely the +intellect, but the whole moral and spiritual nature of him who first +uttered them in their fulness. There is a fact in science strange, +apparently illogical, but yet unquestionable. It is this: The power of +heat-bearing rays to pass through any resisting medium depends not upon +the temperature of the rays, but upon that of the body from which they +come. The heat-bearing rays of the sun that approach the earth hardly +differ in temperature from the rays that are reflected from it; but the +former pass almost unimpeded through the atmosphere by which the latter +are to a great extent imprisoned. The rays reach the earth without +difficulty, but are entrapped by the principle referred to, and remain +to bless the world. The first have this power to pass through the +atmosphere because they come direct from the burning body of the sun. +The reflected rays have lost this power, because they proceed from the +colder earth. This law is as true in the intellectual and spiritual as +it is in the physical world. The power of moral and spiritual truths to +penetrate to the hearts of men has this strange dependence upon the +moral and spiritual power of him who utters them. The very spontaneity +of this utterance is a revelation of this power. It is because the truth +that Jesus uttered came forth from his glowing heart of love, it is +because it sprang fresh and spontaneous from the intensity of his +spiritual life, that it has such power to-day to touch the hearts of +men. As the sun's rays preserve their penetrating force through all the +interplanetary spaces, so the teachings of Christ have preserved it +through all the reaches of history. No subsequent repetition of these +truths can ever have quite the power that their first complete utterance +still retains. And the power that they exercise is largely in this, that +they excite in the hearts of men a spiritual life akin to that from +which they originally sprang. Scientific truths are taught by +demonstration. Spiritual truths are taught chiefly by stimulating the +spiritual life. When we live merely in the contemplation of laws, in the +study of external relations, our intellect is stimulated, but our moral +and spiritual nature may be comparatively dormant. Our life is +stimulated as we are brought into living relationship with the universe. +As our inner nature is thus stimulated, as it rounds itself into +completeness, the moral and spiritual consciousness is awakened. This is +the reason why it so often happens that spiritual truths are so real in +moments of sorrow. In its sorrow the soul lives wholly in love, and it +receives the enlightenment of love. Our nation had almost forgotten God; +but in those terrible years of war, when every soul was full of life and +earnestness, the earth and the heavens were full of God. Our nation's +history became transparent to us, as the history of the Hebrews was +transparent to them, and we saw God's providence in it all. Theology has +wrestled vainly with science. In such a struggle it will always be the +loser. Christian theology can never conquer science. Christian life must +absorb science into itself. + +The truths that Jesus uttered, as they have been absorbed into the +common thought of men, or as they are received directly from the record +of his life, have a mighty power to purify the thought and elevate the +hearts of men. But I think that the greatest power of Christ to-day is +that of imparting his life to the men and women who are now living in +the world. The power of the Church will depend upon its power to receive +this life and to impart it. It is well to have a true theology; but the +church that has the most of the life of Christ will accomplish the most +for men. It brings to this truth-seeking and law-investigating age the +pure personality which it needs. And it will at last possess the truest +theology, for now and evermore it is the life that is the light of men. + + + + +THE MYTHICAL ELEMENT + +IN THE + +NEW TESTAMENT. + +By FREDERIC HENRY HEDGE. + + "[Greek: Philosophôteron kai spoudaioteron poiêsis historias estin.]" + + Aristotle. + + +When Dr. Strauss, thirty-five years ago, in his "Life of Jesus," +advanced and applied to the narrative of the New Testament a theory of +interpretation, in principle the same with that which a Christian Father +of the third century had employed in his treatment of the Old, the +theological world was profoundly shocked by what seemed to be the last +impiety of criticism. A hundred champions rushed with drawn pen to the +rescue of the old interpretation of the text. The truth of Christianity +was supposed to be assailed; the belief in Christianity as divine +revelation was felt to be imperilled by a theory which substituted +mythical figment for historic fact. That no such harm was intended, or +was likely to ensue from his labors, the author himself assures us in +the preface to that extraordinary work. "The inner kernel of Christian +faith," he declares, "is entirely independent of all such criticism. +Christ's supernatural birth, his miracles, his resurrection and +ascension, remain eternal truths, however their reality as facts of +history may be called in question." + +In this declaration I find a fitting text for the following discourse. + +How far does the cause of Christianity depend on the facts, or alleged +facts, of the Gospel narrative? Or, to state the question in other +words, Is the truth of Christianity identical and conterminous with the +literal truth of its record? + +It is obvious at the start that a certain amount of historic truth must +be assumed as implied in the very existence of any religion which dates +from a personal founder whose thought it professes to embody, and whose +name it bears. Christianity purports to be founded on the ministry of a +Jewish teacher, entitled by his followers "the Christ." We have the +testimony of a nearly contemporary Latin historian to the fact that an +individual so named was the leader of a numerous body of religionists, +and was put to death by command of Pontius Pilate, in the reign of +Tiberius. But, without this confirmation, the very existence of the +Christian Church compels us to accept as historic facts, the ministry of +Jesus, the strong impression of his word and character, his purity of +manners and moral greatness, his life of beneficent action, his martyr +death, and his manifestation to his disciples after death, however that +manifestation be conceived, whether as subjective experience or as +objective reality. So much, beyond all reasonable question, must stand +as history, vouched by documentary evidence, and by the existence, in +the first century, of a church universally diffused, which affirmed +these facts as the ground of its being, and in the strength of them +overcame the world. + +But, observe, it is Christianity that assures the truth of these facts, +and not the facts that prove Christianity. To base the truth of +Christianity on the credibility, in every particular, of the Gospel +record; to measure the claims of the religion by the strict historic +verity of all the narrative of the New Testament, is to prejudice the +Christian cause in the judgment of competent critics. It is to challenge +the cavil and counter-demonstration of unbelief. + +Christianity assures the truth of certain facts; but by no means of all +the facts affirmed by the writers of the New Testament. Faith in +Christianity as divine dispensation does not imply, and must not be held +to the belief, as veritable history, of all that is recorded in the +Gospel. Not the historic sense, but the spiritual import; not the facts, +but the ideas of the Gospel, are the genuine topics of faith. + +Christianity, like every other religion, has its mythology,--a mythology +so intertwined with the veritable facts of its early history, so braided +and welded with its first beginnings, that history and myth are not +always distinguishable the one from the other. Every historic religion, +that has won for itself a conspicuous place in the world's history, has +evolved from a core of fact a nimbus of legendary matter which criticism +cannot always separate, and which the popular faith does not seek to +separate, from the solid parts of the system. And in one view the +legends or myths which gather around the initial stage of any religion +are as true as the vouched and substantial facts of its record: they are +a product of the same spirit working, in the one case, in the acts and +experiences; in the other, in the visions, the ideas, the literary +activity of the faithful. It is one and the same motive that inspires +both the writer and the doer. + +When I speak of historic religions, I mean such as trace their origin +to some historic personage, and bear the impress of his idea, in +contradistinction to those which have sprung from unknown sources, the +wild growths of nature-worship as found in ancient Egypt, in the Indian +and Scandinavian peninsulas, and in Greece. + +No distinction in religion is so fundamental as that between the wild +religions and those which have sprung from the word of a human sower +going forth to sow; the religions of sense and those of reflection, the +"natural" and the "revealed." The prime characteristic of the former is +polytheism; that of the latter, monotheism. Mosaism, Mohammedism, +Buddhism,--so far as it knows any God,--even Parsism, is monotheistic in +as much as its dualism is resolvable into the final triumph and +supremacy of the good. No founder of a religion ever taught a plurality +of gods. + +Another characteristic of the wild religions is their transitoriness. +The Egyptian, the Greco-Roman, the Scandinavian, perished long ago. +Bramanism, the last survivor of the ancient polytheisms, is fast melting +beneath the advancing heats of Islam and the Brahmo Somaj. The +"revealed" religions on the contrary are permanent. No religion of +historic origin, so far as I know, has ever died out. Judaism, the +eldest of them, still flourishes: never since the destruction of +Jerusalem has it flourished with a greener leaf than now. Mohammedism is +pushing its conquests faster than Christianity in the East, Parsism is +still strong in Bengal, Buddhism in one or another form calls a third +part of the population of the globe its own. + +All religions have their mythologies, but with this distinction: +polytheism is mythical in principle as well as form, in soul as well as +body, and mythical throughout. Its whole being is myth. Whatever of +scientific or historic truth may be hidden in any of its legends, such +as the labors of Herakles, the fire-theft of Prometheus, or the rape of +Europa, is matter of pure conjecture. In the "revealed" religions, on +the contrary, the mythical is incidental, not principial, and always +subordinate to doctrine or fact. Always the truth shines through the +myth, explains it, justifies it. + +Before proceeding any farther, I desire to explain what I mean by myth +in this connection. I shall not attempt a philosophic definition, but +content myself with this general determination. I call any story a myth +which for good reasons is not to be taken historically, and yet is not a +wilful fabrication with intent to deceive, but the natural growth of +wonder and tradition, or a product of the Spirit uttering itself in a +narrative form. The myth may be the result of exaggeration, the +expansion of a veritable fact which gathers increments and a _posse +comitatus_ of additions as it travels from mouth to ear and ear to mouth +in the carriage of verbal report; or it may be the reflection of a fact +in the mind of a writer, who reproduces it in his writing with the color +and proportions it has taken in his conception; or it may be the poetic +embodiment of a mental experience; or it may be what Strauss calls "the +deposit[8] of an idea," and another critic "an idea shaped into fact." I +think we have examples of all these mythical formations in the New +Testament; and I hold that the credit of the Gospel in things essential +is nowise impaired, nor the claim of Christianity as divine revelation +compromised, by a frank admission of this admixture of fancy with fact +in its record. On the contrary, I deem it important, in view of the +vulgar radicalism which confounds the Christian dispensation and its +record, soul and body, in one judgment, to separate the literary +question from the spiritual, and to free the cause of faith from the +burden of the letter. + +[Footnote 8: Niederschlag.] + +It has been assumed that the proof of divine revelation rests on +precisely those portions of the record which are most offensive to +unbelief. On this assumption the Christian apologists of a former +generation grounded their plea. Prove that we have the testimony of +eye-witnesses to the miracles recorded in the Gospels, and Christianity +is shown to be a divine revelation. In the absence of such proof (the +inference is) Christianity can no longer claim to be, in the words of +Paul, "the power of God unto salvation." This is substantially Paley's +argument. Planting himself on the premise that revelation is impossible +without miracles, in which it is implied that miracles prove revelation, +he labors to establish two propositions: 1. "That there is satisfactory +evidence that many professing to be original witnesses of the Christian +miracles passed their lives in dangers, labors, and sufferings, +voluntarily undergone in attestation of the accounts which they +delivered, and solely in consequence of their belief in those accounts; +and that they also submitted from the same motives to new rules of +conduct." 2. "That there is _not_ satisfactory evidence that persons +pretending to be original witnesses of any other similar miracles have +acted in the same manner in attestation of the accounts which they +delivered, and solely in consequence of their belief in the truth of +those accounts." The argument is stated with the characteristic +clearness of the author, and as well supported perhaps as Anglican +church-erudition in those days would allow; but the case is not made +out, and, if it were, the argument fails to satisfy the sceptical mind +of to-day. To say nothing of its gross misconception of the nature of +revelation, which it makes external instead of internal, a stunning of +the senses instead of mental illumination, an appeal to prodigy and not +its own sufficient witness,--waiving this objection, the argument fails +when confronted with the fact that, in spite of the evidence which +scholars and critics the most learned and acute of all time have arrayed +in support of the genuineness of the Gospels, the number is nowise +diminished, but rather increases, of intelligent minds that find +themselves unable, on the faith of any book, however ancient, to receive +as authentic a tale of wonders which contradict their experience of the +limits of human ability and their faith in the continuity of nature. For +myself, I beg to say, in passing, I am not of this number. I do not feel +the force of the objection against miracles drawn from this alleged +constancy of nature, which it seems to me reduces the course of human +events to a dead mechanical sequence, makes no allowance for any +reserved power in nature or any incalculable forces of the Spirit, and +virtually rules God, the present inworking God, out of the universe. I +can believe in any miracle which does not actually and demonstrably +contravene and nullify ascertained laws, however phenomenally foreign to +nature's ordinary course. But the possibility of miracles is one thing, +the possibility of proving them another. With such views as these +objectors entertain of the constancy of nature, I confess that no +testimony, not even the written affidavit of a dozen witnesses taken on +the spot, supposing that we had it, would suffice to convince me of the +truth of marvels occurring two thousand years ago, of the kind recounted +in the Gospels. My Christian prepossessions might incline me to believe +in them: the weight of evidence would not. No wise defender of the +Christian cause, at the present day, will rest his plea on the issue to +which Paley committed its claims. After all that Biblical critics and +antiquarian research have raked from the dust of antiquity in proof of +the genuineness and authenticity of the books of the New Testament, +credibility still labors with the fact that the age in which these books +were received and put in circulation was one in which the science of +criticism as developed by the moderns--the science which scrutinizes +statements, balances evidence for and against, and sifts the true from +the false--did not exist; an age when a boundless credulity disposed men +to believe in wonders as readily as in ordinary events, requiring no +stronger proof in the case of the former than sufficed to establish the +latter,--viz., hearsay and vulgar report; an age when literary honesty +was a virtue almost unknown, and when, consequently, literary forgeries +were as common as genuine productions, and transcribers of sacred books +did not scruple to alter the text in the interest of personal views and +doctrinal prepossessions. The newly discovered Sinaitic Code, the +earliest known manuscript of the New Testament, dates from the fourth +century. Tischendorf the discoverer, a very orthodox critic, speaks +without reserve of the license in the treatment of the text apparent in +this manuscript,--a license, he says, especially characteristic of the +first three centuries. + +These considerations, though they do not discredit the essential facts +of the Gospel history,--facts assured to us, as I have said, by the +very existence of the Christian Church,--might seem to excuse the +hesitation of the sceptic in accepting, on the faith of the record, +incidental marvels of a kind very difficult of proof at best. I recall +in this connection the remarkable saying of an English divine of the +seventeenth century. "So great, in the early ages," says Bishop Fell, +"was the license of fiction, and so prone the facility of believing, +that the credibility of history has been gravely embarrassed thereby; +and not only the secular world, but the Church of God, has reason to +complain of its mythical periods."[9] + +[Footnote 9: Tanta fuit primis seculis fingendi licentia, tam prona in +credendo facilitas, ut rerum gestarum fides graviter exinde laboraverit, +nec orbis tantum terrarum sed et Dei ecclesia de temporibus suis +mythicis merito queratur.] + +It is not in the interest of criticism, much less of a wilful +iconoclasm, from which my whole nature revolts, but of Christian faith, +that I advocate the supposition of a mythical element in the New +Testament. I am well aware that in this advocacy I shall lack the +consent of many good people who identify the cause of religion with its +accidents, and fancy that the sanctuary is in danger when a blind is +raised to let in new light. I respect the piety that clings to idols +which Truth has outgrown, as Paul at Athens respected the religion which +worshipped ignorantly the unknown God. But Truth once seen will draw +piety after it, and new sanctities will replace the old. No Protestant +in these days feels himself bound to accept as history the +ecclesiastical legends of the post-apostolic age. Some of them are quite +as significant as some of those embodied in the canon; but no Protestant +scruples to reject as spurious the story of the caldron of boiling oil +into which St. John was thrown by order of the Emperor Domitian, and +from which he escaped unharmed, or that of the lioness which licked the +feet of Thecla in the circus at Antioch, or Peter's encounter with +Christ in the suburbs of Rome. If we talk of evidence, I do not see but +the miracles said to be performed by the relics of martyrs at Milan, +attested by St. Augustine, and those of St. Cuthbert of Durham, attested +by the venerable Bede, are as well substantiated as the opening of the +prison doors and the liberation of the Apostles by an angel, attested by +Luke. The Church of Rome makes no such distinction between the first and +the following centuries: she indorses the miracles of all alike. But +modern Protestantism draws a line of sharp separation between the +apostolic and the post-apostolic ages. On the farther side the portents +are all genuine historic facts: on the hither side they are all +figments. While John the Evangelist, the last of the twelve, yet +breathed, a miracle was still possible: his breath departed, it became +an impossibility for evermore. And yet when Conyers Middleton first ran +this line between the ages, and published his refutation of the claim of +continued miraculous power in the Church, religious sensibility +experienced a shock as great as that inflicted in our day by Strauss, +and resented with equal indignation the affront to Christian faith. The +author of the "Free Inquiry" published in 1748 was assailed by +opponents, who "insinuate" he tells us "fears and jealousies of I know +not what consequences dangerous to Christianity, ruinous to the faith of +history, and introductive of universal scepticism." The larger work had +been preceded by an "Introductory Discourse" put forth as a feeler of +the public pulse; for "I began," he says, "to think it a duty which +candor and prudence prescribed, not to alarm the public at once with an +argument so strange and so little understood, nor to hazard an +experiment so big with consequences till I had at first given out some +sketch or general plan of what I was projecting." The experiment which +required such careful preparation was to ascertain how far the English +public in the middle of the eighteenth century would bear to have it +said that the miracles affirmed by Augustine and Chrysostom and Jerome, +as occurring in their day, were not as worthy of credit as any of the +wonders recorded in the New Testament. Up to that time, English +Protestants as well as Romanists had given equal credence to both, and +esteemed the former as essential to Christian faith as the latter. Men +like Waterland and Dodwell and Archbishop Tillotson held that miracles +continued in the Church until the close of the third century, and were +even occasionally witnessed in the fourth. Whiston, the consistent +Arian, maintained their continuance up to the establishment of the +Athanasian doctrine in 381, and "that as soon as the Church became +Athanasian, antichristian, and popish, they ceased immediately; and the +Devil lent it his own cheating and fatal powers instead." + +To me, I confess, the position of the Church of Rome in this matter +seems less indefensible than that of Middleton and modern Protestantism. +Either deny the possibility of miracles altogether to finite powers, or +admit their possibility in the second century, and the third century, as +well as the first, and in all centuries whenever a worthy occasion +demands such agency. I can see no reason for separating, as Middleton +does, the age of the Apostles from all succeeding. Had he drawn the line +between the miracles of Christ and those ascribed to his followers, the +principle of division would have been more intelligible, and more +admissible on the ground of ecclesiastical orthodoxy. + + * * * * * + +But the question here is not of the possibility or probability of +miracles, as such, in one age rather than another. It is a question +simply of Biblical interpretation,--whether the literal sense of the +record is in every case the true sense, whether history or fiction is +the key to certain Scriptures. Those who insist on the verbal +inspiration of the New Testament will be apt to likewise insist on the +literal historic sense of every part of every narrative. And yet that +mode of interpretation is by no means a necessary consequence or logical +outcome of that theory. Origen believed in the verbal inspiration of the +Old Testament, but Origen did not accept in their literal sense the +Hebrew theophanies: he allegorized whatever seemed to him to degrade the +idea of God. The Spirit can utter itself in fiction as well as fact, and +in communicating with Oriental minds was quite as likely to do so. And +surely, for those who reject the notion of verbal inspiration, the way +is open, in perfect consistency with Christian faith, for such +interpretation as reason may approve or the credit of the record be +thought to require. The credit of the record will sometimes require an +allegorical interpretation instead of a literal one. + +It is a childish limitation which in reading stories can feel no +interest in any thing but fact; and a childish misconception which +supposes that where the form is narrative, historic fact must needs be +the substance. Recount to a little child a fable of Pilpay or Æsop, and +his questions betray his inability to apprehend it otherwise than as +literal fact. He has no doubt of the truth of the story; "what did the +lion say then?" he asks; and "what did the fox do next?" The maturer +mind has also no doubt of the truth of the story, but sees that its +truth is the moral it embodies. Of many of the Gospel stories the moral +contained in them is the real truth. In the height of our late civil war +there appeared in a popular journal a story entitled "A Man without a +Country," related with such artistic verisimilitude, such minuteness of +detail, such grave official references, that many who read it not once +suspected the clever invention, and felt themselves somewhat aggrieved +when apprised that fiction, not fact, had conveyed the moral intended by +the genial author. But those who saw from the first through the veil of +fiction the needful truth and the patriotic intent were not less edified +than if they had believed the characters real, and every incident +vouched by contemporary record. The story of William Tell was once +universally received as authentic history: it was written in the hearts +of the people of Uri, and so religiously were all its incidents +cherished, that when a book appeared discrediting the sacred tradition +it was publicly burned by the hangman at Altorf. For five centuries the +chapel on the shore of the Lake of the Four Cantons has commemorated a +hero whose very existence is now questioned, of whom contemporary annals +know nothing, of whose tyrant Gessler the well-kept records of the +Canton exhibit no trace, whose apple placed as a mark for the father's +arrow on the head of his child is proved to have done a foregone service +in an elder Danish tale. The story resolves itself into an idea. That +idea is all that concerns us; and that idea survives, inexpugnable to +criticism, a truth for evermore. In the world of ideas there is still a +William Tell who defied the tyrant at Altorf, and slew him at Küsnacht, +and whose image will live while the mountains stand that gave it birth. + +And so all that is memorable out of the past, all that tradition has +preserved, the veritable facts of history as well as the myths of +legendary lore, pass finally into ideas. Only as ideas they survive, +only as ideas have they any abiding value. The anecdote recorded of +Aristides--his writing his own name at the request of an ignorant +citizen on the shell that should condemn him--embodies a noble idea +which has floated down to us from the head-waters of Grecian history. Do +we care to know the evidence on which it rests? If by critical +investigation the fact were made doubtful, would that doubt at all +impair the truth of the idea? The story of Damon and Pythias, reported +by Valerius Maximus, for aught that we know, may be a myth: suppose it +could be proved to be so, the truth that is in it would be none the less +precious. We do not receive it on the faith of the historian, but on the +faith of its own intrinsic beauty. There is scarcely a fact in the +annals of mankind so vouched and ascertained as to be beyond the reach +of historic doubt, if any delver in ancient documents, or curious +sceptic, shall see fit to call it in question. But, however the fact may +be questioned, the idea remains. We have lived to see apologies for +Judas Iscariot, and the literary rehabilitation of Henry VIII. But Judas +is none the less, in popular tradition, the typical traitor, the +impersonation of devilish malice; and Henry VIII. is no less the +remorseless tyrant whose will was his God. When Napoleon I. pronounced +all history a fable agreed on, he reasoned better perhaps than he knew. +The agreement is the thing essential; but that agreement is never +complete, is never final. Every original writer of history finds +something to qualify, and often something to reverse, in the judgment of +his predecessors. How can it be otherwise, when even eye-witnesses +disagree in their observation and report of the same transaction; when +even in a matter so recent as the siege of Paris, or the conflagration +of Chicago, the verification of facts is embarrassed by contradictory +accounts? The best that history yields to philosophic thought is not +facts, but ideas. These are all that remain at last when the tale is +told,--all, at least, that the mind can appropriate, all that profits in +historical studies, the intellectual harvest of the past. A fact means +nothing until thought has transmuted it into itself: its value is simply +the idea it subtends. Homer's heroes are as true in this sense as those +of Plutarch. Ajax and Hector are as real to me as Cimon or Lysander; Don +Quixote's battle with the windmills which Cervantes imagined is as real +as the battle of Lepanto in which Cervantes fought; and Shakespeare's +Hamlet is incomparably more real than the Prince of Denmark whom Saxo +Grammaticus chronicles. + +I do not underrate the importance of facts on their own historic plane. +The historian, as annalist, is bound by the rules of his craft with +conscientious investigation to ascertain, substantiate, and establish, +if he can, the precise facts of the period he explores. I only contend +that historic truth is not the only truth; that a fact,--if I may use +that term in this connection for want of a better,--that a fact which is +not historically true may yet be true on a higher plane than that of +history, true to reason, to moral and religious sentiment and human +need. The story of Christ's temptation is none the less true, but a +great deal more so, when the narrative which embodies the interior +psychological fact is conceived as myth, than when it is interpreted as +veritable history. The truth that concerns us is that the Son of Man +"was tempted in all points as we are," not that he was taken by the +Devil and set on a pinnacle of the Temple, and thence spirited away +"into an exceeding high mountain." + +We have now attained a point of view from which to estimate on the one +hand the real import of what I have ventured to call the myths of the +New Testament, and on the other hand to overrule the petulant radicalism +which, not distinguishing truth of idea from truth of fact, contemns +these legends, and perhaps contemns the Gospel, on their account. I have +wished to show how unessential it is to the right enjoyment or +profitable use of those portions of the record that we receive them as +fact; to show that, if we seize and appropriate the idea, those +narratives are quite as edifying from a mythical as from an historical +point of view; in other words, that the Holy Spirit may and does +instruct by fiction as well as fact. If I am asked to draw the line +which separates fact from fiction, or to fix the criterion by which to +discriminate the one from the other, I answer that I do not pretend to +decide this point for myself, much less should I presume to attempt to +settle it for others. I am not disposed to dogmatize on the subject. It +is a matter in which each must judge for himself. I will only say that +for myself I do not place the line of demarcation between miracle and +the unmiraculous, for the reason that it seems to me, as I said before, +unphilosophical to make our every-day experience of the limits of human +power and the capabilities of nature an absolute standard by which to +measure the possible scope of the one or the other. + +I content myself with a single illustration of what I regard as a +mythical formation. My example is the story known as "The Annunciation." +Luke alone, of all the evangelists, records the tale. The angel Gabriel +is sent to a virgin named Mary, and surprises her with the tidings, +"Thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and shalt bring forth a son, and shalt +call his name Jesus. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of +the Highest. And the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his +father David. And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever, and +of his kingdom there shall be no end." This beautiful legend, the most +beautiful, I think, of all the legends connected with the birth of +Christ, the favorite theme of Christian art, so lovingly handled by Fra +Angelico, by Correggio, Raphael, Titian, Andrea del Sarto, and a host of +others, is best understood as a Jewish-Christian conception, taking an +historic form and "shaped into a fact." The legend represents the +humility and faith of a pious maiden communing with the heavenly +Presence, drawing to herself divine revelations of grace and promise, +and thus sanctioning the hope so dear to every Jewish maiden,--that of +becoming the mother of the Messiah. The sudden inspiration of that hope +is the angel of the Annunciation. + +A word more. How far is our idea of Christ affected by a mode of +interpretation which supposes a mingling of mythical with historic +elements in the Gospel record? That idea is based on the representations +of the evangelists. Will not our confidence in those representations be +impaired by this view of their contents? I see no cause to apprehend a +result so distressing to Christian faith. The mythical interpretation of +certain portions of the Gospel has no appreciable bearing on the +character of Christ. The impartial reader of the record must see that +the evangelists did not invent that character; they did not make the +Jesus of their story; on the contrary, it was he that made them. It is a +true saying that only a Christ could invent a Christ. The Christ of +history is a true reflection of the image which Jesus of Nazareth +imprinted on the mind of his contemporaries. In that image the spiritual +greatness, the moral perfection, are not more conspicuous than the +well-defined individuality which permeates the story, and which no +genius could invent. + +If the Christ of the Church, of Christian faith, is, as some will have +it, an ideal being, it was Jesus of Nazareth who made the ideal. The +ideal in him is simply the result of that disengagement from the earthly +vestiture which death and distance work in all who live in history. By +the very necessity of its function, history idealizes. The historic +figure and the individual represented by it, though inseparably one in +substance, are not so identical in outline that the one exactly covers +the other, no more and no less. The individual is the bodily presence as +it dwells in space; the historic figure is the image of himself which +the individual stamps on his time, and, so far as his record reaches, on +all succeeding time,--his import to human kind. That image is a +veritable portrait, but not in the sense of a _fac-simile_. A material +portrait, a portrait painted with hands, if the painter understands his +art, is not a _fac-simile_: it presents the chronic idea or +characteristic mode, not the temporary accidents, "the fallings off, the +vanishings," of the person portrayed. In the hero-galleries of +Tradition, as in the visions of the Apocalypse, they are seen with white +robes, and palms in their hands, and unwrinkled brows of grace, who in +life were begrimed with the dust and furrowed with the cares of their +time. St. Paul is there without his thorn in the flesh, Luther without +his impatience, Washington without his fiery choler, Lincoln without his +coarseness, Dante and Milton without their scorn. History strips off the +indignities of earth when she dresses her heroes for immortality. And +the transfigurations she gives us are nearer the truth than the +limitations of ordinary life. The man is more truly himself in the epic +strain of public action, with spirit braced and harness on, than in the +subsidence and undress of the closet. It is not the gossiping anecdotes, +the spoils of the ungirt private life, so dear to antiquaries and +literary scavengers, but the things which history hastens to record, +that show the man. We must take the life at full-tide; we must view it +in its freest determination, in its supreme moment, to know the deepest +that is in him. And the deepest that is in him is the true man. That is +his idea, his mission to the world, his historic significance. It is +this that concerns us in all the great actors of history,--the historic +person, not the individual. And the more the historic person absorbs the +individual, the higher we rise in the scale of being until we reach the +idea of God, from which all individuality is excluded, and only the +Person remains, filling space and time with the ceaseless procession of +his being. + +We misread the Gospel and reverse the true and divine order, if we +suppose the ideal Christ to be an essence distilled from the historical. +On the contrary, the ideal Christ is the root and ground of the +historical; and without the antecedent idea inspiring, commanding, the +history would never have been. + +It has not been my intention in any thing I have said to make light of +the record. The record to me is a literary relic of inestimable value, +aboriginal memorial of the dearest and divinest appearance in human form +that ever beamed on earthly scenes. I sympathize with every attempt to +clear up and verify its minutest details, with the labors of all critics +and archæologists devoted to this end. I rejoice in all topographical +adjustments and illustrations; in all that local researches, following +in the steps of "those blessed feet," have gleaned from the soil of +Palestine. But all this is important only as it draws its inspiration +from and leads my aspiration to the ideal Christ, "the same yesterday, +to-day, and for ever." Dissociated from this idea, the acres of +Palestine are as barren as any which the ebbing of a nation's life has +left desolate. + + + + +THE PLACE OF MIND IN NATURE + +AND + +INTUITION IN MAN. + +By JAMES MARTINEAU. + + "Behold, there went forth a Sower to sow."--Mark iv. 3. + + +That the universe we see around us was not always there, is so little +disputed, that every philosophy and every faith undertakes to tell how +it came to be. They all assume, as the theatre of their problem, the +field of space where all objects lie, and the track of time where events +have reached the Now. But into these they carry, to aid them in +representing the origin of things, such interpreting conceptions as may +be most familiar to the knowledge or fancy of their age: first, the +_fiat of Almighty Will_, which bade the void be filled, so that the +light kindled, and the waters swayed, and the earth stood fast beneath +the vault of sky; next, when the sway of poetry and force had yielded to +the inventive arts, the idea of a _contriving and adapting power_, +building and balancing the worlds to go smoothly and keep time together, +and stocking them with self-moving and sensitive machines; and now, +since physiology has got to the front, the analogy of _the seed or +germ_, in itself the least of things, yet so prolific that, with history +long enough, it will be as spawn upon the waters, and fill every waste +with the creatures as they are. The prevalence of this newest metaphor +betrays itself in the current language of science: we now "_unfold_" +what we used to "_take to pieces_;" we "_develop_" the theory which we +used to "_construct_;" we treat the system of the world as an +"_organism_" rather than a "_mechanism_;" we search each of its members +to see, not what it is _for_, but what it is _from_; and the doctrine of +_Evolution_ only applies the image of indefinite growth of the greater +out of the less, till from some datum invisible to the microscope arises +a teeming universe. + +In dealing with these three conceptions,--of _Creation_, _Construction_, +_Evolution_,--there is one thing on which Religion insists, viz., that +_Mind is first, and rules for ever_; and, whatever the process be, is +_its_ process, moving towards congenial ends. Let this be granted, and +it matters not by what path of method the Divine Thought advances, or +how long it is upon the road. Whether it flashes into realization, like +lightning out of Night; or fabricates, like a Demiurge, through a +producing season, and then beholds the perfect work; or is for ever +thinking into life the thoughts of beauty and the love of good; whether +it calls its materials out of nothing, or finds them ready, and disposes +of them from without; or throws them around as its own manifestation, +and from within shapes its own purpose into blossom,--makes no +difference that can be fatal to human piety. Time counts for nothing +with the Eternal; and though it should appear that the system of the +world and the ranks of being arose, not by a start of crystallization, +but, like the grass or the forest, by silent and seasonal gradations, as +true a worship may be paid to the Indwelling God who makes matter itself +transparent with spiritual meanings, and breathes before us in the +pulses of nature, and appeals to us in the sorrows of men, as to the +pre-existing Deity who, from an infinite loneliness, suddenly became the +Maker of all. Nay, if the poet always looks upon the world through a +suppliant eye, craving to meet his own ideal and commune with it alive; +if prayer is ever a "feeling after Him to find Him," the fervor and the +joy of both must be best sustained, if they are conscious not only of +the stillness of His presence, but of the movement of His thought, and +never quit the date of His creative moments. In the idea, therefore, of +a gradual unfolding of the creative plan, and the maturing of it by +rules of growth, there is nothing necessarily prejudicial to piety; and +so long as the Divine Mind is left in undisturbed supremacy, as the +living All in all, the belief may even foster a larger, calmer, tenderer +devotion, than the conceptions which it supersedes. But it is liable to +a special illusion, which the others by their coarsely separating lines +manage to escape. Taking all the causation of the world into the +interior, instead of setting it to operate from without, it seems to +dispense with God, and to lodge the power of indefinite development in +the first seeds of things; and the apprehension seizes us, that as the +oak will raise itself when the acorn and the elements are given, so from +its germs might the universe emerge, though nothing Divine were there. +The seeds no doubt were on the field; but who can say whether ever "a +Sower went forth to sow"? So long as you plant the Supreme Cause at a +distance from His own effects, and assign to Him a space or a time where +nothing else can be, the conception of that separate and solitary +existence, however barren, is secure. But in proportion as you think of +Him as never in an empty field, waiting for a future beginning of +activity, as you let Him mingle with the elements and blend with the +natural life of things, there is a seeming danger lest His light should +disappear behind the opaque material veil, and His Spirit be quenched +amid the shadows of inexorable Law. This danger haunts our time. The +doctrine of Evolution, setting itself to show how the greatest things +may be brought out of the least, fills us with fear whether perhaps Mind +may not be last instead of first, the hatched and full-fledged form of +the protoplasmic egg; whether at the outset any thing was there but the +raw rudiments of matter and force; whether the hierarchy of organized +beings is not due to progressive differentiation of structure, and +resolvable into splitting and agglutination of cells; whether the +Intellect of man is more than blind instinct grown self-conscious, and +shaping its beliefs by defining its own shadows; whether the Moral sense +is not simply a trained acceptance of rules worked out by human +interests, an inherited record of the utilities; so that Design in +Nature, Security in the Intuitions of Reason, Divine Obligation in the +law of Conscience, may all be an illusory semblance, a glory from the +later and ideal days thrown back upon the beginning, as a golden sunset +flings its light across the sky, and, as it sinks, dresses up the East +again with borrowed splendor. + +This doubt, which besets the whole intellectual religion of our time, +assumes that we must _measure every nature in its beginnings_; admit +nothing to belong to its essence except what is found in it then; and +deny its reports of itself; so far as they depart from that original +standard. It takes two forms, according as the doctrine of Evolution is +applied to Man himself, or to the outward universe. In the former case, +it infuses distrust into our self-knowledge, weakens our subjective +religion or native faith in the intuitions of thought and conscience, +and tempts us to imagine that the higher they are, the further are they +from any assured solidity of base. In the latter case, it weakens our +objective religion, suggests that there is no originating Mind, and that +the divine look of the world is but the latest phase of its finished +surface, instead of the incandescence of its inmost heart. Let us first +glance at the theory of HUMAN evolution, and the moral illusions it is +apt to foster. + +I. Under the name of the "Experience Philosophy," this theory has long +been applied to the _mind of the individual_; and has produced not a few +admirable analyses of the formation of language and the tissue of +thought; nor is there any legitimate objection to it, except so far as +its simplifications are overstrained and cannot be made good. It +undertakes, with a minimum of initial capacity, to account for the +maximum of human genius and character: give it only the sensible +pleasures and pains, the spontaneous muscular activity, and the law by +which associated mental phenomena cling together; and out of these +elements it will weave before your eyes the whole texture of the perfect +inner life, be it the patterned story of imagination, the delicate web +of the affections, or the seamless robe of moral purity. The outfit is +that of the animal; the product but "a little lower than the angel." All +the higher endowments--our apprehension of truth, our consciousness of +duty, our self-sacrificing pity, our religious reverence--are in this +view merely transformed sensations; the disinterested impulses are +refinements spun out of the coarse fibre of self-love; the subtlest +intellectual ideas are but elaborated perceptions of sight or touch; +and the sense of Right, only interest or fear under a disguise. If this +be so, how will the discovery affect our natural trust in the +intimations of our supreme faculties? Does it not discharge as dreams +their most assured revelations? By intuition of Reason we believe in the +Law of Causality, in the infinitude of Space, in the relations of +Number, in the reality of an outside world, in all the fundamental +conceptions of Science; but here are they, one and all, recalled to the +standard of Sense, which they seem to transcend, and emptied of any +meaning beyond. By vision of Imagination we see an ideal beauty +enfolding many a person and many a scene, and appealing to us as a +pathetic light gleaming from within; but here we find it all resolved +into curvature of lines and adjustments of color. By inspiration of +Conscience we learn that our sin is the defiance of a Divine authority, +and, though hid from every human eye, drives us into a wilderness of +Exile,--for "the wicked fleeth, though no man pursueth;" but here we are +told that the ultimate elements of good and evil are our own pleasures +and pains, from which the moral sanction selects as its specialty the +approbation and disapprobation of our fellow-men. Thus all the +independent values which our higher faculties had claimed for their +natural affections and beliefs are dissipated as fallacious; they are +all based upon a _sentient measure_ of worth which lies at the bottom; +they are like paper money, refined contrivances representative of the +ultimate gold of pleasure, but, where not interchangeable with this, +intrinsically worthless. And so the feeling almost inevitably spreads, +that we are dupes of our own characteristic capacities; that the loftier +air into which they lift us is a tinted and distorting medium, and +shows us glories that are not there; that the idea of an eternal Fount +of beauty, truth and goodness, behind the pleasingness and concinnity of +phenomena, is an illusion; and that the tendency, irresistible as it is, +to cling to this idea as something higher than its denial, is but a part +of the romance. Is this scepticism imaginary? Let any one, in studying +the modern writers of this school, compare the solid, manly, sensible +way in which they deal with every thing on the physiological and +sensational level, with their manner towards all the convictions and +sentiments usually recognized as the supreme lights of our nature; the +tone now of forbearing indulgence, now of sickly appreciation, often of +hardly concealed contempt, that is heard beneath the interminable +conjectural analyses of Moral and Religious affections,--and he will +feel the difference between the honor that is paid to truth, and the +constrained patience towards what other men revere. + +By a recent extension, the theory of Evolution has been applied to the +whole natural history of our race; and the resources of _Habit_, already +serviceable in explaining the aptitudes of individuals, have been turned +to account on the larger scale of successive generations, transmitting +by inheritance the acquisitions hitherto made good. In the training of a +nature, the world thus becomes a permanent school, the interruption of +death is virtually abolished, and life is laid open to continuous +progress. By this immense gain of power, it is supposed, all the +differences which separate Man from other animals may be accounted for +as gradual attainments; and many an intuition of the mind, too immediate +and self-evident to be a product of personal experience, may yield to +analysis as a more protracted growth, and stand as the compend of ages +of gathering feeling and condensing thought. Among creatures that herd +together for common safety, each one learns to read the looks of anger +or of good-will in its neighbors, and discovers what it is that brings +upon him the one or other; and insensibly he forms to himself a rule for +avoiding the displeasure and conciliating the favor in which he has so +large an interest. This rudimentary experience imprints and records +itself in the nervous organization, and descends to ulterior generations +as an original and instinctive recoil from what offends and impulse +towards what gratifies the feeling of the tribe: so that the lesson +needs not be gone over again; but the offspring, taking up his education +where the parent left off, accumulates his feeling, quickens his mental +execution, and hands down fresh contributions to what at last emerges as +a Moral Sense. In this way, it is contended, the Conscience is a hoarded +fund of traditionary pressures of utility, gradually effacing the +primitive vestiges of fear, and dispensing itself with an affluence of +disinterested sympathy. And the religious consciousness that visits the +soul in its remorse, of an invisible Witness and Judge who condemns the +sin, comes, we are told, from the deification of public opinion, or the +fancy that some dead hero's ghost still watches over the conduct of his +clan. + +This vast enlargement of the doctrine of Evolution, while increasing its +power, and removing it from the reach of accurate tests, alters neither +its principle nor its practical effect. It undertakes to exhibit the +highest and the greatest in our nature as ulterior phenomena of the +lowest and the least. And it usually treats as a superstition our +natural reverence for the rational, moral, and religious intuitions as +sources of independent insight and ultimate authority; and, in order to +estimate them, translates them back into short-hand expressions of +sensible experience and social utility. Nor can we wonder at this +scepticism. If the only reality at bottom of the sense of duty is fear +and submission to opinion, whatever it carries in it that transcends +this ground, and persuades us of an Obligation in which fear and opinion +have no voice, is an ideal addition got up within us by causes which +produce in us all sorts of psychological figments. If the only facts +that lie in our idea of Space are a set of feelings in the muscles and +the skin and the eye, then whatever beliefs it involves which these +cannot verify are naturally discredited, and treated as curiosities of +artificial manufacture. If our human characteristics are throughout the +developed instincts of the brute, differing only in degree, then the +moment they present us with intuitions which are distinct _in kind_, +they begin to play us false; and those who see through the cheat +naturally warn us against them. And so we are constantly told that our +highest attributes are only the lower that have lost their memory, and +mistake themselves for something else. + +It is not my present intention to call in question either of these +varieties of evolution. Inadequate as the evidence of them both appears +to be, I will suppose their case to be made out: and still, I submit, it +does not justify the sceptical estimate which it habitually fosters of +the intellectual, moral, and religious intuitions of the human mind. +For, + +(1) Though animal sensation, with its connected instinct, should be the +raw material of our whole mental history, it is not on that account +entitled _to measure all that comes after it_, and stand as the +boundary-line between fact and dream, between terra firma and "airy +nothing." That which is first in Time has no necessary priority of rank +in the scale of truth and reality; and the later-found may well be the +greater existence and the more assured. If it is a development of +Faculty, and not of incapacity, which the theory provides, the process +must advance us into new light, and not withdraw us from clearer light +behind: and we have reason to confide in the freshest gleams and inmost +visions of to-day, and to discard whatever quenches and confuses them in +the vague and turbid beginnings of the Past. With what plea will you +exhort me, "If you would rid yourself of intellectual mysteries, come +with us, and see the stuff your thought is made of: if you would stand +free of ideal illusions, count with us the medullary waves that have run +together into the flood-tide of what you call your conscience: if you +would shake off superstition, look at the way in which the image of dead +men will hang about the fancy of a savage, or the personification of an +abstract quality imposes on the ignorance of simple times"? Is our +wisdom to be gathered by going back to the age before our errors? And +instead of consulting the maturity of thought, are we to peer into its +cradle and seek oracles in its infant cries? If the last appeal be to +the animal elements of experience, we can learn only by unlearning; and +by shutting one after another of the hundred ideal eyes of the finished +intellect, we shall have a chance of seeing and feeling things as they +are. If nothing is to be deemed true but what the pre-human apes saw, +then all the sciences must be illusory; with the suicidal result that, +with them, this doctrine of Evolution must vanish too. Or if, stopping +short of this extreme distrust of the acquired intuitions, you make a +reservation in favor of the new visions of the intellect, what right can +you show for discharging those of the conscience? The tacit assumption +therefore that you upset a super-sensual belief, by tracing the history +of its emergence among sensible conditions, is a groundless prejudice. + +(2) Further, the question to be determined may be presented as a problem +in physiology, to be resolved by corresponding rules: What is the +_function_ of certain parts of our human constitution, viz., the Reason +and the Moral Faculty? Now it is a recognized principle that, in +estimating function, you must study the organ, not in its rudimentary +condition, before it has disengaged itself from adjacent admixtures and +flung off the foreign elements, but in its perfect or differentiated +state, so as to do its own work and nothing else. In order to give the +idea of a timepiece to one who had it not, you would not send him to one +of the curious mediæval clocks which could play a tune, and fire a gun, +and announce the sunrise, and mark the tides, and report twenty +miscellaneous things besides; but to the modern chronometer, simple and +complete, that, telling only the moment, tells it perfectly. And in +natural organizations, to learn the capabilities and project of any +structure, you would not resort to the embryo where it is forming but +not working: you would wait till it was born into the full presence of +the elements with which it had to deal; not till then could you see how +they played upon it, and what was its response to them. In conformity +with this rule, whither would you betake yourself, if you want to +measure the intrinsic competency of our intellectual faculty, and +determine what its very nature gives it to know? Would you take counsel +of the nurse who held you "when you first opened your eyes to the +light,"[10] or otherwise study "the first consciousness in any infant," +"before the time when memory commences,"[11] and disregard every thing +"subsequent to the first beginnings of intellectual life"?[12] On the +contrary, you would avoid that soft inchoate promise of nature, only +nominally born, where the very structures of its finer work have not yet +set into their distinctive consistency and form; and will hold your +peace till the faculty is awake and on its feet, and can clearly tell +you what it sees for itself, and what it makes out at second-hand: just +as, to gauge the lunar light, you must have patience while the thin +crescent grows, and wait till the full orb is there. Still less can you +take the report of the Moral Faculty from the confessions of the cradle, +or from the quarrels and affections of the apes; the conditions being +not yet present for the bare conception of a moral problem. The most +that can be asked of an intuition is, that it shall keep pace with the +cases as they arise, and be on the spot when it is wanted; and if you +would know what provision our nature holds for dealing with its Duty and +interpreting its guilt, you must go into the thick of its moral life, +and bid it tell you what it sees from the swaying tides of temptation +and of victory. The "purity" of intuitions is not "pristine," but +ultimate; cleared at length from accidental and irrelevant dilutions, +and with essence definitely crystallized, they realize and exhibit the +idea that lay at the heart of all their tentatives, and constitutes +their truth. Am I told that it is hopeless at so late an hour to +separate what is an indigenous gift from what is implanted by education? +I reply, it no doubt requires, but it will not baffle, the hand of +skilled analysis; it is a difficulty which, in other cases, we find it +not impossible to overcome; for there are assuredly instincts and +affections, strictly original and natural, that make no sign and play no +part till our maturer years, yet which are readily distinguished from +the products of artificial culture. + +[Footnote 10: Mill's Examination of Hamilton, 3d ed. p. 172.] + +[Footnote 11: Ibid.] + +[Footnote 12: Ibid., p. 160.] + +If, to find the functions of our higher faculties, we must look to their +last stage, and not to their first, we at once recover and justify the +ideal conceptions which the expositors of Evolution are accustomed to +disparage as romance. For among these functions are present certain +Intuitive beliefs--for the Reason, in Divine Causality; for the +Conscience, in Divine Authority; together blending into the knowledge of +a Supreme and Holy Mind. These august apprehensions we are entitled to +declare are not the illusions, but the discoveries, of Man; who, by +rising into them, is born into more of the Universe of things than any +other being upon earth, and is made conscious of its transcendent and +ultimate realities. If these trusts are indeed the growth of ages, from +seeds invisibly dropped upon the field of time, be it so; it was not +without hand: there was _a Sower_ that went forth to sow. + +II. We turn now to the Second Form of doubt raised by the doctrine of +Evolution: under which it weakens our objective trust in an originating +Mind. + +A naturalist who to his own satisfaction has traced the pedigree of the +human intellect, conscience, and religion, to Ascidian skin-bags +sticking to the sea-side rocks, is not likely to arrest the genealogy +there, at a stage so little fitted to serve as a starting-point of +derivative being. Or, if his own retreat should go no further, others +will take up the regressive race, and, soon passing the near and easy +line into the vegetable kingdom, will work through its provinces to its +lichen-spotted edge: and, after perhaps one shrinking look, will dare +the leap into the dead realm beyond, and bring home the parentage of all +to the primitive elements of "matter and force." To give effect to this +extension over the universe at large of the theory of Evolution, the +scientific imagination of our day has long been meditating its projected +book of Genesis, and has already thrown out its special chapters here +and there; and though the scenes of the drama as a whole are not yet +arranged, the general plan is clear: that the Lucretian method is the +true one; that nothing arises for a purpose, but only from a power; that +no Divine Actor therefore is required, but only atoms extended, +resisting, shaped, with spheres of mutual attraction and repulsion; +that, with these _minima_ to begin with, a growth will follow of itself +by which the _maxima_ will be reached; and that thus far the chief and +latest thing it has done is the apparition of Mind in the human race and +civilization in human society, conferring upon man the melancholy +privilege of being, so far as he knows, at the summit of the universe. + +The main support of this doctrine is found in two arguments, supplied +respectively by physical science and by natural history; each of which +we will pass under review. + +i. The former relies on the new scientific conception of the _Unity of +Force_. When Newton established the composition of Light in his treatise +on Optics, and the law of Gravitation in his Principia, he conceived +himself to be treating of two separate powers of nature, between which, +quick as he was to seize unexpected relations, he dreamt of no +interchange. Yet now it is understood that when collisions occur of +bodies gravitating on opposite lines, the momenta that seem to be killed +simply burst into light and heat. When Priestley's experiments detected +the most important chemical element on the one hand, and the fundamental +electrical laws on the other, he seemed to move on paths of research +that had no contact. Yet, in the next generation, chemical compounds +were resolved by electricity; which again turns up in exchange for +magnetism, and can pass into motion, heat, and light. To see the +transmigration of natural agency, trace only through a few of its links +the effect of the sunshine on the tropic seas. So far as it warms the +mass of waters, either directly or through the scorched shores that they +wash, it stirs them into shifting layers and currents, and creates +_mechanical_ power. But it also removes the superficial film; and thus +far spends itself, not in raising the temperature, but in changing the +form from liquid to vapor, and so altering the specific gravity as to +transfer what was on the deep to the level of the mountain-tops. It is +the Pacific that climbs and crowns the Andes, resuming on the way the +liquid state in the shape of clouds, and as it settles crystallizing +into solid snow and ice. The original set of solar rays have now played +their part, and made their escape elsewhere. But there is sunshine among +the glaciers too, which soon begins to resolve the knot that has been +tied, and restore what has been stolen. It sets free the waters that +have been locked up, and lets their gravitation have its play upon their +flow. As they dash through ravines, or linger in the plains, they steal +into the roots of grass and tree, and by the tribute which they leave +pass into the new shape of _vital_ force. And if they pass the +homesteads of industry, and raise the food of a civilized people, who +can deny that they contribute not only to the organic, but to the +_mental_ life, and so have run the whole circuit from the lowest to the +highest phase of power? That the return back may be traced from the +highest to the lowest, is shown by every effort of thought and will; +which through the medium of nervous energy in one direction sets in +action the levers of the limbs, and in another works the laboratory of +the organic life, and forms new chemical compounds, of which some are +reserved for use, while others pass into the air as waste. Still +further: all doubt of identity in the force which masks itself in these +various shapes is said to be removed by the test of direct measurement +before and after the change. The heating of a pound of water by one +degree has its exact mechanical equivalent;[13] and a given store of +elevated temperature will overcome the same weights, whether applied +directly to lift them, or turned first into a thermo-electric current, +so as to perform its task by deputy.[14] The inference drawn from the +phenomena of which these are samples is no less than this: that each +kind of force is convertible into any other, and undergoes neither gain +nor loss upon the way; so that the sum-total remains for ever the same, +and is only differently represented as the proportions change amongst +the different forms of life, and between the organic and the inorganic +realms. Hence arises the argument that, in having _any_ force, you have +virtually _all_; and that, assuming only material atoms as depositories +of mechanical resistance and momentum, you can supply a universe with an +exhaustive cosmogony, and dispense with the presence of Mind, except as +one of its phenomena. + +[Footnote 13: Viz., the fall of 772 lbs. through a foot. See Mr. Joule's +Experiments in Grove's Correlation of Physical Forces, p. 34, 5th ed.] + +[Footnote 14: See Grove's Correlation, p. 255, 5th ed.] + +To test this argument, let us grant the data which are demanded, and +imagine the primordial space charged with matter, in molecules or in +masses, in motion or rest, as you may prefer. Put it under the law of +gravitation, and invest it with what varieties you please of density and +form. Thus constituted, it perfectly fulfils all the conditions you have +asked; it presses, it moves, it propagates and distributes impulse, is +liable to acceleration and retardation, and exhibits all the phenomena +with which any treatise on Mechanics can properly deal. In order, +however, to keep the problem clear within its limits, let us have it in +the simplest form, and conceive the atoms to be all of _gold_; then, I +would fain learn by what step the hypothesis proposes to effect its +passage to the _chemical_ forces and their innumerable results. _Heat_ +it may manage to reach by the friction and compression of the materials +at its disposal; and its metal universe may thus have its solid, liquid, +and gaseous provinces; but, beyond these varieties, its homogeneous +particles cannot advance the history one hair's breadth through an +eternity. It is not true, then, that the conditions which give the first +type of force suffice to promote it to the second; and in order to start +the world on its chemical career, you must enlarge its capital and +present it with an outfit of _heterogeneous_ constituents. Try, +therefore, the effect of such a gift; fling into the pre-existing +caldron the whole list of recognized elementary substances, and give +leave to their affinities to work: we immediately gain an immense +accession to our materials for the architecture and resources for the +changes of the world,--the water and the air, the salts of the ocean, +and the earthy or rocky compounds that compose the crust of the globe, +and the variable states of magnetism and heat, which throw the +combinations into slow though constant change. But with all your +enlargement of data, turn them as you will, at the end of every passage +which they explore, the _door of life_ is closed against them still; and +though more than once it has been proclaimed that a way has been found +through, it has proved that the living thing was on the wrong side to +begin with. It is not true, therefore, that, from the two earlier stages +of force, the ascent can be made to the vital level; the ethereal fire +yet remains in Heaven; and philosophy has not stretched forth the +Promethean arm that can bring it down. And if, once more, we make you a +present of this third phase of power, and place at your disposal all +that is contained beneath and within the flora of the world, still your +problem is no easier than before; you cannot take a single step towards +the deduction of sensation and thought: neither at the upper limit do +the highest plants (the exogens) transcend themselves and overbalance +into animal existence; nor at the lower, grope as you may among the +sea-weeds and sponges, can you persuade the sporules of the one to +develop into the other. It is again not true, therefore, that, in virtue +of the convertibility of force, the possession of any is the possession +of the whole: we give you all the forms but one; and that one looks +calmly down on your busy evolutions, and remains inaccessible. Is, then, +the transmigration of forces altogether an illusion? By no means; but +before one can exchange with another, _both must be there_; and to turn +their equivalence into a universal formula, _all_ must be there. With +only one kind of elementary matter, there can be no chemistry; with +only the chemical elements and their laws, no life; with only vital +resources, as in the vegetable world, no beginning of mind. But let +Thought and Will with their conditions once be there, and they will +appropriate vital power; as life, once in possession, will ply the +alembics and the test-tubes of its organic laboratory; and chemical +affinity is no sooner on the field than it plays its game among the +cohesions of simple gravitation. Hence it is impossible to work the +theory of Evolution upwards from the bottom. If all force is to be +conceived as One, its type must be looked for in the highest and +all-comprehending term; and Mind must be conceived as there, and as +divesting itself of some specialty at each step of its descent to a +lower stratum of law, till represented at the base under the guise of +simple Dynamics. Or, if you retain the forces in their plurality, then +you must _assume_ them _all_ among your data, and confess, with one of +the greatest living expositors of the phenomena of Development, that +unless among your primordial elements you scatter already the germs of +mind as well as the inferior elements, the Evolution can never be +wrought out.[15] But surely a theory, which is content simply to assume +in the germ whatever it has to turn out full-grown, throws no very +brilliant light on the genesis of the Universe. + +[Footnote 15: Lotze's Mikrokosmus, B. iv. Kap. 2, Band ii. 33, seqq.] + +ii. The second and principal support of the doctrine under review is +found in the realm of natural history, and in that province of it which +is occupied by _living beings_. Here, it is said, in the field of +observation nearest to us, we have evidence of a power in each nature to +push itself and gain ground, as against all natures less favorably +constituted. There is left open to it a certain range of possible +variations from the type of its present individuals, of which it may +avail itself in any direction that may fortify its position; and even if +its own instincts did not seize at once the line of greatest strength, +still, out of its several tentatives, all the feeble results would fail +to win a footing, and only the residuary successes would make good their +ground. The ill-equipped troops of rival possibilities being always +routed, however often they return, the well-armed alone are seen upon +the field, and the world is in possession of "the fittest to live." We +thus obtain a principle of self-adjusting adaptation of each being to +its condition, without resorting to a designing care disposing of it +from without; and its development is an experimental escape from past +weakness, not a pre-conceived aim at a future perfection. + +I have neither ability nor wish to criticise the particular indications +of this law, drawn with an admirable patience and breadth of research, +from every department of animated nature. Though the logical structure +of the proof does not seem to me particularly solid, and the +disproportion between the evidence and the conclusion is of necessity so +enormous as to carry us no further than the discussion of an hypothesis, +yet, for our present purpose, the thesis may pass as if established; and +our scrutiny may be directed only to its bearings, should it be true. + +(1) The genius of a country which has been the birthplace and chief home +of Political Economy is naturally pleased by a theory of this kind; +which invests its favorite lord and master, _Competition_, with an +imperial crown and universal sway. But let us not deceive ourselves with +mere abstract words and abbreviations, as if they could reform a world +or even farm a sheep-walk. _Competition_ is not, like a primitive +function of nature, an independent and original power, which can of +itself do any thing: the term only describes a certain intensifying of +power already there; making the difference, under particular conditions, +between function latent and function exercised. It may therefore turn +the less into the more; and it is reasonable to attribute to it an +_increment_ to known and secured effects; but not new and unknown +effects, for which else there is no provision. It gives but a partial +and superficial account of the phenomena with which it has concern; of +their degree; of their incidence here or there; of their occurrence now +or then: of themselves in their characteristics it pre-supposes, and +does not supply, the cause. To that cause, then, let us turn. Let us +consider what must be upon the field, before competition can arise. + +(2) It cannot act except in the presence of some _possibility of a +better or worse_. A struggle out of relative disadvantage implies that a +relative advantage is within grasp,--that there is a prize of promotion +offered for the contest. The rivalry of beings eager for it is but an +instrument for _making the best of things_; and only when flung into the +midst of an indeterminate variety of alternative conditions can it find +any scope. When it gets there and falls to work, what does it help us to +account for? It accounts certainly for the triumph and _survivorship of +the better_, but not for there _being a better to survive_. _Given_, the +slow and the swift upon the same course, it makes it clear that the race +will be to the swift; but it does not provide the fleeter feet by which +the standard of speed is raised. Nay more; even for the prevalence of +the better ("or fitter to live") it would not account, except on the +assumption that whatever is _better_ is _stronger_ too; and a universe +in which this rule holds already indicates its divine constitution, and +is pervaded by an ideal power unapproached by the forces of necessity. +Thus the law of "natural selection," instead of dispensing with anterior +causation and enabling the animal races to be their own Providence and +do all their own work, distinctly testifies to a constitution of the +world pre-arranged for progress, externally spread with large choice of +conditions, and with internal provisions for seizing and realizing the +best. On such a world, rich in open possibilities, of beauty, strength, +affection, intellect, and character, they are planted and set free; +charged with instincts eagerly urging them to secure the preferable line +of each alternative; and disposing themselves, by the very conditions of +equilibrium, into a natural hierarchy, in which the worthiest to live +are in the ascendant, and the standard of life is for ever rising. What +can look more like the field of a directing Will intent upon the good? +Indeed, the doctrine of "natural selection" owes a large part of its +verisimilitude to its skilful imitation of the conditions and method of +Free-will;--the indeterminate varieties of possible movement; the +presentation of these before a selective power; the determination of the +problem by fitness for preference,--all these are features that would +belong no less to the administration of a presiding Mind; and that, +instead of resorting for the last solution to this high arbitrament, men +of science should suppose it to be blindly fought out by the competing +creatures, as if they were supreme, is one of the marvels which the +professional intellect, whatever its department, more often exhibits +than explains. + +(3) But, before competition can arise, there must be, besides the field +of favorable possibility, _desire or instinct_ to lay hold of its +opportunities. Here it is that we touch the real dynamics of evolution, +which rivalry can only bring to a somewhat higher pitch. Here, it must +be admitted, there is at work a genuine principle of progression, the +limits of which it is difficult to fix. Every being which is so far +individuated as to be a separate centre of sensation, and of the +balancing active spontaneity, is endowed with a self-asserting power, +capable, on the field already supposed, of becoming a self-advancing +power. Under its operation, there is no doubt, increasing +differentiation of structure and refinement of function may be expected +to emerge; nor is there any reason, except such as the facts of natural +history may impose, why this process should be arrested at the +boundaries of the species recognized in our present classifications. +Possibly, if the slow increments of complexity in the organs of sentient +beings on the globe were all mapped out before us, the whole teeming +multitudes now peopling the land, the waters, and the air, might be seen +radiating from a common centre in lines of various divergency, and, +however remote their existing relations, might group themselves as one +family. The speculative critic must here grant without stint all that +the scheme of development can ask; and he must leave it to the +naturalist and physiologist to break up the picture into sections, if +they must. But then, _Why_ must he grant it? Because here, having +crossed the margin of animal life, we have, in its germ of feeling and +idea, not merely a persistent, but a self-promoting force, able to turn +to account whatever is below it; the mental power, even in its +rudiments, dominating the vital, and constraining it to weave a finer +organism; and, for that end, to amend its application of the chemical +forces, and make them better economize their command of mechanical +force. Observe, however, that, if here we meet with a truly fruitful +agency, capable of accomplishing difficult feats of new combination and +delicate equilibrium, we meet with it _here first_; and the moment we +fall back from the line of sentient life, and quit the scene of this +eager, aggressive, and competing power, we part company with all +principle of progress; and consequently lose the tendency to that +increasing complexity of structure and subtlety of combination which +distinguish the organic from the inorganic compounds. Below the level of +life, there is no room for the operation of "natural selection." Its +place is there occupied by another principle, for which no such wonders +of constructive adaptation can be claimed;--I mean, the dynamic rule of +_Action on the line of least resistance_,--a rule, the working of which +is quite in the opposite direction. For evidently it goes against the +establishment of unstable conditions of equilibrium, and must therefore +be the enemy rather than the patron of the complex ingredients, the +precarious tissues, and the multiplied relations, of sentient bodies; +and on its own theatre must prevent the permanent formation of any but +the simpler unions among the material elements. Accordingly, all the +great enduring masses that form and fill the architecture of inorganic +nature,--its limestone and clay, its oxides and salts, its water and +air,--are compounds, or a mixture, of few and direct constituents. And +the moment that life retreats and surrenders the organism it has built +and held, the same antagonist principle enters on possession, and sets +to work to destroy the intricate structure of "proximate principles" +with their "compound radicals." With life and mind therefore there +begins, whether by modified affinities or by removal of waste, a +_tension_ against these lower powers, carrying the being up to a greater +or less height upon the wing; but with life it ends, leaving him then to +the perpetual gravitation that completes the loftiest flight upon the +ground. Within the limits of her Physics and Chemistry alone, Nature +discloses no principle of progression, but only provisions for +periodicity; and out of this realm, without further resources, she could +never rise. + +The downward tendency which sets in with any relaxation of the +differentiating forces of life is evinced, not only in the extreme case +of dissolution in death, but in the well-known relapse of organs which +have been artificially developed into exceptional perfection back into +their earlier state, when relieved of the strain and left to themselves. +Under the tension of a directing mental interest, whether supplied by +the animal's own instincts or by the controlling care of man, the +organism yields itself to be moulded into more special and highly +finished forms; and a series of ascending variations withdraws the +nature from its original or first-known type. But wherever we can lift +the tension off, the too skilful balance proves unstable, and the law of +reversion reinstates the simpler conditions. Only on the higher levels +of life do we find a self-working principle of progression: and, till we +reach them, development wants its dynamics; and, though there may be +evolution, it cannot be self-evolution. + +These considerations appear to me to break the back of this formidable +argument in the middle; and to show the impossibility of dispensing with +the presence of Mind in any scene of ascending being, where the little +is becoming great, and the dead alive, and the shapeless beautiful, and +the sentient moral, and the moral spiritual. Is it not in truth a +strange choice, to set up "_Evolution_," of all things, as the negation +of _Purpose_ pre-disposing what is to come? For what does the word mean, +and whence is it borrowed? It means, to unfold from within; and it is +taken from the history of the seed or embryo of living natures. And what +is the seed but a casket of pre-arranged futurities, with its whole +contents _prospective_, settled to be what they are by reference to ends +still in the distance. If a grain of wheat be folded in a mummy-cloth +and put into a catacomb, its germ for growing and its albumen for +feeding sleep side by side, and never find each other out. But no sooner +does it drop, thousands of years after, on the warm and moistened field, +than their mutual play begins, and the plumule rises and lives upon its +store till it is able to win its own maintenance from the ground. Not +only are its two parts therefore relative to each other, but both are +relative to conditions lying in another department of the world,--the +clouds, the atmosphere, the soil; in the absence of which they remain +barren and functionless:--and _this_, from a Cause that has no sense of +relation! The human ear, moulded in the silent matrix of nature, is +formed with a nerve susceptible to one influence alone, and that an +absent one, the undulations of a medium into which it is not yet born; +and, in anticipation of the whole musical scale with all its harmonies, +furnishes itself with a microscopic grand-piano of three thousand +stretched strings, each ready to respond to a different and definite +number of aerial vibrations:--and _this_, from a Cause that never meant +to bring together the inner organ and the outer medium, now hidden from +each other! The eye, shaped in the dark, selects an exclusive +sensibility to movements propagated from distant skies; and so weaves +its tissues, and disposes its contents, and hangs its curtains, and +adjusts its range of motion, as to meet every exigency of refraction and +dispersion of the untried light, and be ready to paint in its interior +the whole perspective of the undreamed world without:--and _this_, from +a Cause incapable of having an end in view! Surely, nothing can be +evolved that is not first involved; and if there be any thing which not +only carries a definite future in it, but has the whole _rationale_ of +its present constitution grounded in that future, it is the embryo, +whence, by a strange humor, this denial of final causes has chosen to +borrow its name. Not more certainly is the statue that has yet to be, +already potentially contained in the pre-conception and sketches of the +artist, than the stately tree of the next century in the beech-mast that +drops upon the ground; or the whole class of Birds, if you give them a +common descent, in the eggs to which you choose to go back as first; or +the entire system of nature in any germinal cell or other prolific +_minimum_ whence you suppose its organism to have been brought out. +Evolution and Prospection are inseparable conceptions. Go back as you +will, and try to propel the movement from behind instead of drawing it +from before, development in a definite direction towards the realization +of a dominant scheme of ascending relations is the sway of an overruling +end. To take away the ideal basis of nature, yet construe it by the +analogy of organic growth, will be for ever felt as a contradiction. It +is to put out the eyes of the Past, in order to show us with what secure +precision, amid distracting paths, and over chasms bridged by a hair, it +selects its way into the Future. + +If the Divine Idea will not retire at the bidding of our speculative +science, but retains its place, it is natural to ask, what is its +relation to the series of so-called Forces in the world? But the +question is too large and deep to be answered here. Let it suffice to +say, that there need not be any _overruling_ of these forces by the will +of God, so that the supernatural should disturb the natural; or any +_supplementing_ of them, so that He should fill up their deficiencies. +Rather is His Thought related to them as, in Man, the mental force is +related to all below it; turning them all to account for ideal ends, and +sustaining the higher equilibrium which else would lapse into lower +forms. More truly, yet equivalently, might we say, these supposed +forces, which are only our intellectual interpretation of classes of +perceived phenomena, are but varieties of His Will, the rules and +methods of His determinate and legislated agency, in which, to keep +faith with the universe of beings, He abnegates all change; but beyond +which, in His transcendent relations with dependent and responsible +minds, He has left a glorious margin for the free spiritual life, open +to the sacredness of Personal Communion, and the hope of growing +similitude. + + + + +THE RELATIONS + +OF + +ETHICS AND THEOLOGY. + +By ANDREW P. PEABODY. + + +My subject is the mutual relations of Ethics and Theology. + +Ethics is the science of the Right; and we would first inquire whether +this science is a mere department of theology, or whether it has its own +independent existence, sphere, and office. Our opening question then is: +What is the ground of right? Why are certain acts right, and certain +other acts wrong? Are these characteristics incidental, arbitrary, +created by circumstances; variable with time or place, or the +intelligence of the agent; contingent on legislation, human or Divine? +Or are they intrinsic, essential, independent of command, even of the +Divine command? + +We can best answer this question by considering what is implied in +existence. Existence implies properties, and properties are fitnesses. +Every object, by virtue of its existence, has its place, purpose, uses, +relations. At every moment, each specific object is either in or out of +its place, fulfilling or not fulfilling its purpose, subservient to or +alienated from its uses, in accordance or out of harmony with its +relations, and therefore in a state of fitness or of unfitness as +regards other objects. Every object is at every moment under the control +of the intelligent will either of the Supreme Being or of some finite +being, and is by that will maintained either in or out of its place, +purpose, uses, and relations, and thus in a state of fitness or +unfitness as regards other objects. Every intelligent being, by virtue +of his existence, bears certain definite relations to outward objects, +his fellow-beings, and his Creator. At every moment each intelligent +being is either faithful or unfaithful to these relations, and thus in a +state of fitness or unfitness as regards outward objects and other +beings. Thus fitness or unfitness may be predicated at every moment of +every object in existence, of the volitions by which each object is +controlled, and of every intelligent being with regard to his voluntary +position in the universe. Fitness and unfitness are the ultimate ideas +that underlie the terms _right_ and _wrong_. These last are metaphorical +terms: right, _rectus_, straight, upright, according to rule, and +therefore _fit_; wrong, _wrung_, distorted, twisted out of place, +abnormal, and therefore _unfit_. We are so constituted that we cannot +help regarding fitness with esteem and complacency; unfitness, with +disesteem and disapproval, even though we ourselves create it or +impersonate it. + +Fitness is the law by which alone we have the knowledge of sin, by which +alone we justify or condemn ourselves. Duty has fitness for its only aim +and end. To whatever object comes under our control its fit place or use +is due; and our perception of that _due_ constitutes our _duty_, and +awakens in us a sense of obligation. To ourselves and to other beings +and objects, our fidelity to our relations has in it an intrinsic +fitness; that fitness is their and our due; and the perception of that +_due_ constitutes our _duty_, and awakens in us a sense of obligation. + +Conscience is the faculty by which we perceive fitness or unfitness. Its +functions are not cognitive, but judicial. Its decisions are based upon +our knowledge, real or imagined, from whatever source derived. It judges +according to such law and evidence as it has; and its verdict is always, +relatively, a genuine _verdict_ (_verum dictum_), though potentially +false and wrong by defect of our knowledge,--even as in a court of law +an infallibly wise and incorruptibly just judge may pronounce an utterly +erroneous and unjust decision, if he have before him a false statement +of facts, or if the law which he is compelled to administer be +unrighteous. What we call the education of conscience is merely the +accumulation and verification of the materials on which conscience is to +act; in fine, the discovery of fitnesses. + +Permit me to illustrate the function of conscience by reference to a +question now mooted in our community,--the question as to the moral +fitness of the temperate use of fermented liquors. Among the aborigines +of Congo and Dahomey, there being no settled industry, no mental +activity, and no hygienic knowledge as to either body or mind, it seems +fitting, and therefore right, to swallow all the strong drink that they +can lay their hands upon; for it is fitted to produce immediate animal +enjoyment,--the only good of which they have cognizance. Among civilized +men, on the contrary, intoxication is universally known to be opposed to +the fitnesses of body and mind, an abuse of alcoholic liquors, and an +abuse of the drinker's own personality; and it is therefore condemned by +all consciences, by none more heartily than by those of its victims. +But there still remains open the question as to the moderate use of +fermented liquors; and this is not, as it is commonly called, a question +of conscience, but a mere question of fact,--of fitness or unfitness. +Says one party, "Alcohol, in every form, and in the least quantity, is a +virulent poison, and therefore unfit for body and mind." Says the other +party, "Wine, moderately used, is healthful, salutary, restorative, and +therefore fitted to body and mind." Change the opinion of the latter +party, their consciences would at once take the other side; and, if they +retained in precept and practice their present position, they would +retain it self-condemned. Change the opinion of the former party, their +consciences would assume the ground which they now assail. Demonstrate +to the whole community--which physiology may one day do--the precise +truth in this matter, there would remain no differences of conscientious +judgment, whatever difference of practice might still continue. + +From what has been said, it is necessarily inferred that right and wrong +are not contingent on the knowledge of the moral agent. Unfitness, +misuse, abuse, is none the less wrong because the result of ignorance. +If the result of inevitable ignorance, it does not indeed imply an +unfitness or derangement of the agent's own moral powers. Yet it is none +the less out of harmony with the fitness of things. It deprives an +object of its due use. It perverts to pernicious results what is +salutary in its purpose. It lessens for the agent his aggregate of good +and of happiness, and increases for him his aggregate of evil and of +misery. In this sense--far more significant than that of arbitrary +infliction--the maxim of jurisprudence, _Ignorantia legis neminem +excusat_ ("Ignorance of the law excuses no one"), is a fundamental +principle of human nature. + + * * * * * + +We are now prepared to consider the relation of moral distinctions to +theology. In the first place, if the ground which I have maintained be +tenable, ethical science rests on a basis of its own, wholly independent +of theology. Right and wrong, as moral distinctions, in no wise depend +on the Divine will and law; nay, not even on the Divine existence. The +atheist cannot escape or disown them. They are inseparable from +existence. For whatever exists, no matter how it came into being, must +needs have its due place, affinities, adaptations, uses; and an +intelligent dweller among the things that are cannot but know something +of their fitnesses and harmonies, and, so far as he acts upon them, +cannot but feel the obligation to recognize their fitnesses, and thus to +create or restore their harmonies. Even to the atheist, vice is a +violation of fitnesses which he knows or may know. It is opposed to his +conscientious judgment. He has with regard to it an inevitable sense of +wrong. I can therefore conceive of an atheist's being--though I should +have little hope that he would be--a rigidly virtuous man, and that on +principle. + +But while atheism does not obliterate moral distinctions, or cancel +moral obligation, these distinctions are a refutation of atheism; and +from the very fitness of things, which we have seen to be the ground of +right, we draw demonstrative evidence of the being, unity, and moral +perfectness of the Creator: so that the fundamental truths of theology +rest on the same basis with the fundamental principles of ethics. Let me +ask you to pursue this argument with me. + +Every object, as I have said, must, by virtue of its existence, have its +fit place and use; but, in a world that was the dice-work of chance, +there would be myriads of probabilities to one against any specific +object's attaining to its fit place and use. This must be the work of +will alone. If chance can create, it cannot combine, co-ordinate, +organize. If it can throw letters on the ground by the handful, it +cannot arrange them into the Iliad or the Paradise Lost. If it can stain +the sky or the earth with gorgeous tints, it cannot group them into a +Madonna or a landscape. Its universe would be peopled by straylings, +full of disjointed halves of pairs,--of objects thrown together in such +chaotic heaps that seldom could any one object find its counterpart or +subserve its end. + +The opposite is the case in the actual world. The first discoveries +which the first human being made were of the fitnesses of the objects +around him to himself and to one another. With every added year his +microcosm enlarged, so that, before he left the world, he had within his +cognizance a range of fitnesses and uses sufficient to guide his own +activity, and to enable him to predict its results, together with +numerous other results not contingent on his own agency. Beyond this +microcosm, indeed, lay a vast universe impenetrable to his search, in +which he could trace no relations, no filaments of order; in which all +seemed to him a medley of chaotic confusion, mutually intruding systems, +clashing and jarring forces. On this realm of the unknown man has ever +since been making perpetual aggressions; and every step of his progress +has been the discovery of fitnesses, relations, reciprocal uses, among +the most remote, diverse, and at first sight mutually hostile objects, +classes, and systems. Natural history, physics, and chemistry, are the +science of mutual fitnesses and uses among terrestrial objects. +Astronomy is the science of harmonies among all the worlds,--of +fitnesses in their relations and courses to the condition of things in +our own planet, approximately to other bodies in the solar system, and, +by ascertained analogies, to those distant orbs of which we know only +that they stand and move ever in their order. Geology is the science of +mutual fitnesses in former epochs and conditions of our own planet, and +of prospective fitnesses in them to the needs and uses of the present +epoch; so that by harmonies which run through unnumbered æons we are the +heirs, and sustain our industries by the usufruct, of the ages, the +great moments of whose history we are just beginning to read. +Mathematical science reveals geometrical and numerical fitnesses, +proportions, and harmonies, which are traced alike in the courses of the +stars and in the collocation of the foliage on the tree, and which +promise one day to give us the equation of the curve of the sea-shell, +of the contour of the geranium-leaf, of the crest of the wave. There is +still around us the realm of the unknown; yet not only are daily +aggressions made upon it, but science has advanced so far as to render +it certain that there is no department or object in the universe, which +is not comprehended in this system of mutual fitnesses, harmonies, and +uses. + +Now consider the relation of organized being to this system. What is an +organ? It is the capacity of perceiving, choosing, and utilizing a +fitness. The rootlets of the tree by the river-side perceive the +adjacent water, elongate themselves toward it, in a drought make +convulsive and successful efforts to reach it; while the corolla of the +heliotrope perceives the calorific rays, and turns toward their source +in the heavens. The organs of the plant select from the elements around +it such substances as are fitted to feed its growth, and appropriate +them to its use, even though they be found in infinitesimal +proportions, in masses of alien substance. In all this there is a +semi-self-consciousness, corresponding, not indeed to the action of +mind, but to that of the spontaneous life-processes in intelligent +beings. + +The animal carries us a step higher. His instincts are an unerring +knowledge of fitnesses and uses within his sphere. He seeks what is +fitted, shuns what is unfitted to his sustenance and growth, is never +deceived when left to his own sagacity, and fails only when brought into +anomalous relations with the superior knowledge of man. He lives, merely +because he is conscious of the fitnesses of nature, and yields up his +life to a stronger beast, in accordance with those same +fitnesses--beneficent still--by which all realms of nature are kept +fully stocked, yet never overstocked, with healthy and rejoicing life. + +The fitness which thus pervades and unifies the entire creation, man as +an animal perceives, as a living soul recognizes and comprehends; and to +his consciousness it is an imperative law, obeyed always with +self-approval, disobeyed only with self-condemnation. Of disobedience he +alone is capable, yet he but partially. In order to live, he must obey +in the vast majority of instances; still more must he obey, if he would +have society, physical comfort, transient enjoyment of however low a +type; and the most depraved wretch that walks the earth purchases his +continued being by a thousand acts of unintended yet inevitable +obedience to one of voluntary guilt. Man's law--the law which, in +violating or scorning it, he cannot ignore or evade--is the very same +fitness which runs through all inorganic nature, and which the +semi-conscious tree, shrub, or flower, the imperfectly self-conscious +bird, fish, or beast uniformly obeys. + +Now can chance have evolved this universal fitness, and the souls that +own their allegiance to it? Is it not the clear self-revelation of a +God, one, all-wise, omnipotent? Has it any other possible solution? +Bears it not, in inscriptions that girdle the universe in letters of +light, the declarations of the Hebrew seer, "In the beginning God +created the heavens and the earth," and "The Lord our God is one Lord"? +I am not disposed to cavil at the argument from design in the structure +and adaptations of any one organized being; but immeasurably more cogent +is this argument from a consenting universe, in which filaments of +fitness, relation, and use cross and recross one another from bound to +bound, from sun to star, from star to earth, from the greatest to the +least, from the order of the heavens to the zoöphyte and the microscopic +animalcule. In the human conscience I recognize at once the revelation +and the perpetual witness of this all-pervading adaptation, this +universal harmony. Conscience is the God within, not in figure, but in +fact. It is the mode in which He who is enshrined in all being, who +lives in all life, takes up his abode, holds his perpetual court, erects +his eternal judgment-seat, within the human soul. + +We pass to the consideration of the moral attributes of the Creator. I +have spoken of moral distinctions as logically separable from and +independent of the Divine nature. From this position alone can we +establish the holiness, justice, and mercy of the Divine Being. In +order to show this, let me ask your attention to the distinction +between necessary and contingent truths; that is, between truths which +have an intrinsic validity, which always were and cannot by any +possibility be otherwise than true, and truths which were made true, +which began to be, and the opposite of which might have been. +Mathematical truth is necessary and absolute truth,--not made truth even +by the ordinance of the Supreme Being, but truth from the very nature of +things, truth co-eternal with God. Omnipotence cannot make two and two +five, or render the sum of the angles of a triangle more or less than +two right angles, or construct a square and a circle of both equal +perimeter and equal surface. In our conception of mathematical truth we +are conscious that it must have been true before all worlds, and would +be equally true had no substance that could be measured or calculated +ever been created. Every mathematical proposition is an inherent +property or condition of the infinite space identical with the Divine +omnipresence, or of the infinite duration identical with the Divine +eternity. + +Moral truth is of the same order, not contingent, but necessary, +absolute. This is distinctly declared in one of the most sublime bursts +of inspiration in the Hebrew Scriptures. If you will trace in the book +of Proverbs the traits of Wisdom as personified throughout the first +nine chapters, you will find that it is no other than a name for the +inherent, immutable, eternal distinction between right and wrong. It is +this Wisdom, who, so far from confessing herself as created, ordained, +or subject, proclaims, "Jehovah possessed me in the beginning of his +way, before his works of old. I was set up from everlasting, from the +beginning, or ever the earth was.... When he prepared the heavens, I +was there.... When he appointed the foundations of the earth, then I was +by him, AS ONE BROUGHT UP WITH HIM; and I was daily his delight, +rejoicing always before him." + +It is only on the principle thus vividly set forth that we can affirm +moral attributes of the Supreme Being. When we say that He is perfectly +just, pure, holy, beneficent, we recognize a standard of judgment +logically independent of his nature. We mean that the law of fitness, +which He promulgates in the human conscience, and which is our only +standard of right, is the self-elected law of his own being. Could we +conceive of omnipotence and omniscience devoid of moral attributes, the +decrees and acts of such a being would not be necessarily right. +Omnipotence cannot make the wrong right, or the right wrong; nor can it +indue either with the tendencies of the other, so that the wrong, that +is, the unfitting, should produce ultimate good, or the right, that is, +the fitting, should produce ultimate evil. God's decrees and acts are +not right because they are his; but they are his because they are right. +On no other ground, as I have said, can we affirm moral attributes of +him. If his arbitrary sovereignty can indue with the characteristics of +right that which has no intrinsic fitness, beauty, or utility, then the +affirmation that He is holy, or just, or good, is simply equivalent to +the absurd maxim of human despotism, "The king can do no wrong." It is +only when we conceive of the abstract right as existing of necessity +from a past eternity, and as a category of the Divine free-will and +perfect prescience, in which the creation had its birth and its +archetypes, that holiness, justice, and goodness, as applied to the +Divine character, have any meaning. + +We thus see that our ethical conceptions underlie our theology, and +that, however explicit the words of revelation may be as to the Divine +nature, he alone can understand them, who recognizes in his own heart +the absoluteness and immutableness of moral distinctions. How many +Christians have there been in every age since the primitive, who, in +using the terms _just_ and _holy_ with reference to the Almighty, have +employed them in an entirely different sense from that in which they are +applied to human conduct, and with regard to supposed dispositions and +acts, which in man they would call unjust and cruel! And this simply +because they have attached no determinate meaning, but only a +conventional and variable sense to ethical terms, and have imagined that +arbitrary power could reverse moral distinctions, or that God could +impose on man one law of right, and himself recognize another. + +We have thus seen that theology is indebted to the fundamental +principles of ethics for the most luculent demonstration of the being, +omnipotence, and omniscience of God, and for the clear conception of his +moral attributes. + + * * * * * + +We will now consider the reciprocal obligations of ethics to theology; +and, in the first place, to Natural Religion. Pure theism attaches the +Divine sanction to the verdicts of conscience, makes them the will, the +voice of God, enforces them by his authority, and elevates the +conception of virtue by establishing a close kindred between the +virtuous man and the Ruler of the universe. And this is much, but not +for many. It has raised some elect spirits to a degree of excellence +which might put Christians to shame. It has conjoined virtue with lofty +devotion and earnest piety in a Socrates and a Marcus Antoninus, and +refined it into a rare purity, chasteness, and tenderness of spirit in a +Plutarch and an Epictetus. But on the masses of mankind, on the worldly +and care-cumbered, on the unphilosophic and illiterate, it has exerted +little or no influence. Moreover, while among the virtuous men of +pre-Christian times and beyond the light of the Jewish revelation, we +recognize some few of surpassing excellence, we find not a single +ethical system, or body of moral precepts, which does not contain +limitations, deficiencies, or enormities utterly revolting to the moral +sense of Christendom. Thus Plato had lofty conceptions of virtue, but +there are directions in which his precepts give free license to lust and +cruelty; and even Socrates sanctioned by his unrebuking intimacy and +fondness the leaders and ornaments of the most dissolute society in +Athens. + +The acme of extra-Christian piety, and consequently of moral excellence, +is presented in the writings and lives of the later Stoics, whose +incorruptible virtue affords the only relief to our weariness and +disgust, as we trace the history of Rome through the profligacy of the +declining commonwealth and the depravity of the empire. We find here the +Simeons and Annas of the Pagan world, who, though with the fleshly arm +they embraced not the Son of God, needed but to see him to adore and +love him. Yet in nothing was Stoicism more faulty than in its exalted +sense of virtue. For it had no charity for sin, no tolerance even for +the inferior forms of goodness. It was the ethics of the unfallen. It +proffered no hope of forgiveness; it let down no helping hand from the +heavens; it uttered no voice from the eternal silence; it opened no +Father's house and arms for the penitent. In Moore's "Lalla Rookh" the +Peri, promised forgiveness and readmission to Paradise on condition of +bringing to the eternal gate the gift most dear to heaven, returns in +vain with the last drop of the patriot's blood. Again, when she brings +the expiring sigh of the most faithful human love, the crystal bar moves +not. Once more she seeks the earth, and bears back the tear of penitence +that has fallen from a godless wretch melted into contrition by a +child's prayer; and for this alone the golden hinges turn. Stoicism +could boast in rich profusion the patriot's blood, could feed the torch +of a love stronger than death; but it could not start the penitential +tear,--it failed of the one gift of earth for which there is joy in +heaven. + +Let us rise, then, from the purest philosophy of the old world to +Christianity in its ethical relations and offices. + +Christianity, as a revelation, covers the entire field of human duty, +and gives the knowledge of many fitnesses, recognized when once made +known, but undiscoverable by man's unaided insight. The two truths which +lie at the foundation of Christian ethics are human brotherhood and the +immortality of the soul. + +1. _Human brotherhood._ The visible differences of race, color, culture, +religion, customs, are in themselves dissociating influences. Universal +charity is hardly possible while these differences occupy the +foreground. Slavery was a natural and congenial institution under Pagan +auspices, and the idea of a missionary enterprise transcends the +broadest philanthropy of heathenism. We find indeed in the ancient +moralists, especially in the writings of Cicero and Seneca, many +precepts of humanity toward slaves, but no clear recognition of the +injustice inseparable from the state of slavery; nor have we in all +ancient literature, unless it be in Seneca (in whom such sentiments +might have had more or less directly a Christian origin), a single +expression of a fellowship broad enough to embrace all diversities of +condition, much less of race.[16] Even Socrates, while he expects +himself to enter at death into the society of good men, and says that +those who live philosophically will approach the nature of the gods, +expresses the belief that worthy, industrious men who are not +philosophers will, on dying, migrate into the bodies of ants, bees, or +other hard-working members of the lower orders of animals. + +[Footnote 16: The verse so often quoted from Terence, "Homo sum; humani +nihil a me alienum puto," will probably occur to many as inconsistent +with my statement. The sentiment of this verse is, indeed, as it stands +by itself, truly Christian; but in the Comedy from which it is quoted, +so far from having a philanthropic significance, it is merely a +busy-body's apology for impertinent interference with the concerns of +his neighbor.] + +The fraternity of our entire race--even without involving the mooted +question of a common human parentage--is through Christianity +established, not only by the Divine fatherhood so constantly proclaimed +and so luculently manifested by Jesus, but equally by the unifying +ministry of his death as a sacrifice for all, and by his parting +commitment of "all the world" and "every creature" to the propagandism +of his disciples. Though the spirit of this revelation has not yet been +embodied in any community, it has inspired the life-work of many in +every age; it has moulded reform and guided progress in social ethics +throughout Christendom; it has twice swept the civilized world clean +from domestic slavery; it has shaken every throne, is condemning every +form of despotism, monopoly, and exclusiveness, and gives clear presage +of a condition in which the old pre-Christian division of society into +the preying and the preyed-upon will be totally obliterated. + +2. _The immortality of the soul_, also, casts a light, at once broad and +penetrating, upon and into every department of duty; for it is obvious, +without detailed statement, that the fitnesses, needs, and obligations +of a terrestrial being of brief duration, and those of a being in the +nursery and initial stage of an endless existence, are very wide +apart,--that the latter may find it fitting to do, seek, shun, omit, +endure, resign, many things which to the former are very properly +matters of indifference. Immortality was, indeed, in a certain sense +believed before Christ, but with feeble assurance, and with the utmost +vagueness of conception; so that this belief can hardly be said to have +existed either as a criterion of duty or as a motive power. How small a +part it bore in the ethics of the Stoic school may be seen, when we +remember that Epictetus, than whom there was no better man, denied the +life beyond death; and in Marcus Antoninus immortality was rather a +devout aspiration than a fixed belief. In the Christian revelation, on +the other hand, the eternal life is so placed in the most intimate +connection with the life and character in this world as to cast its +reflex lights and shadows on all earthly scenes and experiences. + +Christianity, in the next place, makes to us an ethical revelation in +the person and character of its Founder, exhibiting in him the very +fitnesses which it prescribes, showing us, as it could not by mere +precepts, the proportions and harmonies of the virtues, and +manifesting the unapproached beauty, nay, majesty, of the gentler +virtues,--_virtutes leniores_, as Cicero calls them,--which in +pre-Christian ages were sometimes made secondary, sometimes repudiated +with contempt and derision. + +It is, I know, among the commonplaces of the rationalism and secularism +of our time, that the moral precepts of the Gospel were not original, +but had all been anticipated by Greek or Eastern sages. This is not +literally and wholly true; for in some of the most striking of the +alleged instances there is precisely the same difference between the +heathen and the Christian precept that there is between the Old +Testament and the New. The former says, "Thou shalt not;" the latter, +"Thou shalt." The former forbids; the latter commands. The former +prescribes abstinence from overt evil; the latter has for its sum of +duty, "Be thou perfect, as thy Father in heaven is perfect." But the +statement which I have quoted has more of truth in it than has been +usually conceded by zealous champions of the Christian faith; and I +would gladly admit its full and entire truth, could I see sufficient +evidence of it. The unqualified admission does not in the least detract +from the pre-eminent worth of Him who alone has been the Living Law. So +far is this anticipation of his precepts by wise and good men before him +from casting doubts on the divinity of his mission upon earth, that it +only confirms his claims upon our confidence. For the great laws of +morality are, as we have seen, as old as the throne of God; and strange +indeed were it, had there been no intimation of them till the era of +their perfect embodiment and full promulgation. The Divine Spirit, +breathing always and everywhere, could not have remained, without +witness of right, duty, and obligation in the outward universe and in +the human conscience. So, struggling through the mists of weltering +chaos, were many errant light-beams; yet none the less glorious and +benignant was the sun, when in the clear firmament he first shone, +all-illumining and all-guiding. + +But in practical ethics a revelation of duty is but a small part of +man's need. According to a Chinese legend, the founders of the three +principal religious sects in the Celestial Empire, lamenting in the +spirit-land the imperfect success which had attended the promulgation of +their doctrines, agreed to return to the earth, and see if they could +not find some right-minded person by whose agency they might convert +mankind to the integrity and purity which they had taught. They came in +their wanderings to an old man, sitting by a fountain as its guardian. +He recalled to them the high moral tone of their several systems, and +reproached them for the unworthy lives of their adherents. They agreed +that he was the very apostle they sought. But when they made the +proposal to him, he replied, "It is the upper part of me only that is +flesh and blood: the lower part is stone. I can talk about virtue, but +cannot follow its teachings." The sages saw in this man, half of stone, +the type of their race, and returned in despair to the spirit-land. + +There is profound truth in this legend. It indicates at once the mental +receptivity and the moral inability of man, as to mere precepts of +virtue. It is not enough that we know the right. We know much better +than we do. The words which Ovid puts into the mouth of Medea, _Video +meliora, proboque, deteriora sequor_ ("I see and approve the better, I +pursue the worse"), are the formula of universal experience. We, most of +all, need enabling power. This we have through Christianity alone. We +have it: 1. In the Divine fatherhood, as exhibited in those genial, +winning traits, in which Jesus verifies his saying, "He that hath seen +me hath seen the Father,"--a fatherhood to feel which is to render glad +and loving obedience to the Father's will and word; 2. In the adaptation +of the love, sacrifice, and death of Christ to awaken the whole power of +loving in the heart, and thus by the most cogent of motives to urge man +to live no longer for himself, but for him who died for him; 3. In the +assurance of forgiveness for past wrongs and omissions, without which +there could be little courage for future well-doing; 4. In the promise +and realization of Divine aid in every right purpose and worthy +endeavor; 5. In institutions and observances designed and adapted to +perpetuate the memory of the salient facts, and to renew at frequent +intervals the recognition of the essential truths, which give to our +religion its name, character, and efficacy. + + * * * * * + +Thus, while right and obligation exist independently of revelation, and +even of natural religion, Christianity alone enables us to discern the +right in its entireness and its due proportions; and it alone supplies +the strength which we need, to make and keep us true to our obligations, +under the stress of appetite and passion, cupidity and selfishness, +human fear and favor. + +Morality and religion, potentially separable, are yet inseparable in the +will of God, under the culture of Christ. It used to be common to place +the legal and the evangelical element in mutual antagonism. Nothing can +be more profane or absurd than this. That which is not legal is +evangelical only in name and pretence. That which is not evangelical is +legal to no purpose. The religious belief or teaching, which lays not +supreme stress on the whole moral law, is an outrage on the Gospel and +the Saviour. The morality, which rests on any other foundation than +Jesus Christ and his religion, is built on the sand, the prey of the +first onrush or inrush of wind or wave. "What therefore God hath joined +together, let not man put asunder." + + + + +CHRISTIANITY: + +WHAT IT IS NOT, AND WHAT IT IS. + +By G. VANCE SMITH. + + +I. + +In looking back upon the past history of Christianity, it is easy to +trace the existence of two very different ideas of the nature of that +religion. Their influence is discernible in what may be termed its +incipient form, in perhaps the earliest period to which we can ascend, +while it has been especially felt during the last three hundred years, +as also it materially affects the position and relations of churches and +sects at the present moment. From obvious characteristics of each, these +ideas may be respectively designated as the _ritualistic_, or +sacerdotal, and the _dogmatic_, or doctrinal. It is scarcely necessary +to add, that the two have been constantly intermingled and blended +together, acting and reacting upon each other, and either supporting or +else thwarting each other with singular pertinacity. Neither of them is +found, in any instance of importance, existing wholly apart from the +other, so as to be the sole animating principle of a great religious +organization. The nature of the case renders this impossible. +Ritualistic observances cannot be rationally followed without dogmatic +beliefs. The former are the natural exponents of the latter, which +indeed they are supposed to represent and to symbolize. Nor can +doctrinal creeds, again, wholly dispense with outward rites and forms. +Even the most spiritual religion requires some outward medium of +expression, if it is to influence strongly either communities or +individuals. It must, therefore, tacitly or avowedly adopt something of +the dogmatic, if not of the ritualistic, idea, although this may not be +put into express words, much less formed into a definite creed or test +of orthodoxy. + +A common factor of the greatest importance enters into the two +conceptions of Christianity just referred to, though not perhaps in +equal measure. I allude to the moral element, which may also be denoted +as the sense of duty,--duty towards God and towards man. It may, indeed, +be said to be a distinguishing glory of Christianity, that it can hardly +exist at all, under whatever outward form, without being more or less +strongly pervaded by the moral spirit of which the ministry of Christ +affords so rich and varied an expression. It is true, however, that the +ritualistic idea has constantly a tendency to degenerate into a mere +care for church observances, devoid of any high tone of uprightness and +purity in the practical concerns of ordinary life. It is a common thing, +in that great religious communion of Western and Southern Europe which +is so strongly animated by this idea, to see people in the churches +ceremoniously kneeling in the act of prayer, while all the time they are +busy, with eager eyes, to follow every movement in the crowd around +them. In certain countries, many of the ritualistically devout, it is +well known, have no scruple in practising the grossest impositions upon +strangers; a statement which is especially true of those lands that in +modern times have been governed and demoralized beyond others by the +influence of the priestly class, with their religion of material +externalities. A Greek or an Italian brigand, it is said, will rob and +murder his captive with a peaceful conscience, provided only that he +duly confesses to the priest, and obtains his absolution. This last is a +gross and, happily, a rare case. But, equally with the more innocent +acts, it illustrates the natural tendencies of ritualistic Christianity +among various classes of persons. In ordinary civilized society, such +tendencies are kept powerfully in check by other influences. Hence it is +not to be denied that, throughout the Christian world, devotional +feeling and the sense of duty are usually deep and active in their +influence, and that the practical teachings of Christ, directly or +indirectly, exercise a potent control, whatever may be the ritualistic +or the dogmatic idea with which they are associated. + +The ritualistic conception now spoken of offers us a Christianity which +secures "salvation," by the intervention of a priest,--a man who, +though, to all outward appearance, but a human being among human beings, +yet alleges, and finds people to believe, that he can exercise +supernatural functions, and has the power of opening or closing the +gates of heaven to his fellow-men. It is needless to say how large a +portion of Christendom is still under the influence of this kind of +superstition, or how pertinaciously the same unspiritual form of +religion is, at this moment, struggling to establish itself, even in the +midst of the most enlightened modern nations. + +Nor is it necessary here to argue, with any detail, against the notion +of its being either inculcated upon us within the pages of the New +Testament, or enforced by any legitimate authority whatever. Probably +no one who cares to hear or to read these words would seriously maintain +that the Gospel of Christ consists, in any essential way, in submission +to a priesthood, fallible or infallible, in the observance of rites and +ceremonies or times and seasons, or in a particular mode or form of +church government, whatever doctrines these may be supposed to embody or +to symbolize. Such things have, indeed, variously prevailed among the +Christian communities from the beginning. Generation after generation +has seen priests, and Popes, and patriarchs, and presbyters, without +number. These personages have decked themselves out in sacred garments, +assumed ecclesiastical dignities and powers, and sought, many of them, +to heighten the charm and the efficacy of their worship by the aid of +altars and sacrifices, so called, of prostrations, incense, lamps and +candles, and many other such outward accessories. But are such things to +be reckoned among the essentials of Christian faith or Christian +righteousness? Does the presence or the blessing of the Spirit of God, +to the humble, penitent, waiting soul of man, depend upon any thing +which one calling himself a priest can do or say for us? Will any one, +whose opinion is worth listening to, say that it does? + +The teaching of Christ and his Apostles is, in truth, remarkably devoid +of every idea of this kind. So much is this the case, that it may well +be matter of astonishment to find men who profess to follow and to speak +for them holding that in such matters there can be only one just and +adequate Christian course,--that, namely, which commends itself to +_their_ judgment! It is evident, on the contrary,--too evident to be in +need of serious argument,--that the very diversities of opinion and +practice which prevail in the world--as expressed by such names as +Catholic and Protestant, Greek Church and Latin Church, Church of +England and Church of Scotland, Episcopalian, Presbyterian, +Congregational--prove conclusively that nothing imperative has been +transmitted to us. The great Christian brotherhood, in its various +sections and diverse conditions, has manifestly been left, in these +things, to its own sense of what it is good and right to follow. Thus, +too, if we will not close our eyes to the plainest lessons of His +Providence, the Almighty Father gives us to understand that He only asks +from us the service of heart and life that is "in spirit and in truth;" +and, consequently, that we may each give utterance to our thoughts of +praise and thanksgiving, to penitence for sin, to our prayer for the +divine help and blessing, in whatever form of words, through whatever +personal agency, and with whatever accompaniment of outward rite and +ceremony we may ourselves deem it most becoming to employ. + +The second, or dogmatic, conception of the Gospel has been less +generally prevalent than that of which I have been speaking. Yet, ever +since the days of Luther, not to recall the older times of Nicene or +Athanasian controversy, it has been possessed of great influence in some +of the most important Christian nations. Protestant Christianity is +predominantly dogmatic. Under various forms of expression, it makes the +Gospel to consist in a very definite system of _doctrines_ to be +believed; or, if not actually to consist in this, at least to include +it, as its most prominent and indispensable element. We are informed, +accordingly, that a man is not a Christian, cannot be a Christian, and +perhaps it will be added, cannot be "saved," unless he receives certain +long established doctrines, or reputed doctrines, of Christian faith. + +What these are, it is not necessary here minutely to inquire. It is +well, however, to note with care that there would be considerable +differences of opinion in regard to them, among those who would yet be +agreed as to the necessity of holding firmly to the dogmatic idea +referred to. A Roman Catholic, of competent intelligence, would not by +any means agree with an ordinary member of the Anglican church equally +qualified. Both of these would differ in essential points from a member +of the Greek church; and the three would be almost equally at variance +with an average representative of Scotch Presbyterian Calvinism, as also +with one whose standard of orthodoxy is contained in the Sermons, and +the notes on the New Testament, of the founder of Methodism. Nay, it is +well known, even within the limits of the same ecclesiastical communion, +differences so serious may be found as are denoted, in common phrase, by +the terms _ritualistic_ and _evangelical_, and by other familiar words +of kindred import. + +Among the great Protestant sects the want of harmony under notice is, +doubtless, confined within comparatively narrow limits. But there is +diversity, not to say discord, even here. No one will dispute the fact +who has any knowledge of the history of Protestant theology, or who is +even acquainted with certain discussions, a few years ago, among +well-known members of the English Episcopal Church, or with others, of +more recent date, among English Independents,--in both cases on so +weighty a subject as the nature of the Atonement.[17] Moreover, in the +same quarters, varieties of opinion are notorious on such topics as +Baptismal regeneration, the authority of the Priesthood, the inspiration +of Scripture, eternal punishment,--all of them questions of the most +vital importance, in one or other of the popular schemes of the +doctrine. + +[Footnote 17: Between Archbishop Thomson, in _Aids to Faith_, and some +of the writers of _Tracts for Priests and People_; also between several +eminent Independent Ministers, in the _English Independent_ newspaper +(August, 1871).] + +Now the indisputable fact referred to--the existence of this most +serious diversity and opposition of opinion and statement--affords the +strongest reason for considering it an error of the first magnitude to +regard Christianity as essentially consisting in a definite system of +theological dogmas. For is it possible to believe that a divine +revelation of doctrine, such as the Gospel has been so commonly supposed +to be, would have been left to be a matter of doubt and debate to its +recipients? Admitting, for a moment, the idea that the Almighty +Providence had designed to offer to men a scheme of Faith, the right +reception of which should, in some way, be necessary for their +"salvation," must we not also hold that this would have been clearly +made known to them? so clearly, plainly stated as to preclude the +differences just alluded to, as to what it _is_ that has been revealed? +It is impossible, in short, on such an assumption, to conceive of +Christianity, as having been left in so doubtful a position that its +disciples should have found occasion, from age to age, in councils and +assemblies and conferences, in books and in newspapers, to discuss and +dispute among themselves, often amidst anger and bitterness of spirit, +upon the question of the nature or the number of its most essential +doctrines. Of all possible suppositions, surely this is the least +admissible, the most extravagantly inconsistent with the nature of the +case. + +To this consideration must be added another, of even greater weight. We +gain our knowledge of Christianity, and of the Author of Christianity, +from the New Testament. And, in this collection of Gospels and Epistles, +it nowhere appears that it was the intention of Christ or of the early +disciples, to offer to the acceptance of the future ages of the world a +new and peculiar Creed, a Confession of faith, a series of Articles of +belief in facts or in dogmas, such as the speculative theologian of +ancient and of modern times has usually delighted to deal with. This is +nowhere to be seen in the New Testament, although it speedily made its +appearance when the Gospel had passed from the keeping of the primitive +church into that of Greek and Hellenistic converts. + +The only thing that can be supposed to approach this character, within +the sacred books themselves, occurs in such phrases as speak of faith in +Jesus Christ, or also of "believing" in the abstract, without any +expressed object. But in none of these instances can a dogmatic creed be +reasonably held to be the object implied or intended. What is meant, is +simply belief in Jesus as the Christ,[18] as may be at once understood +from the circumstances of the case, and may easily be gathered from a +comparison of passages. In the early days of the Gospel, the great +question between the Christians and their opponents was simply this, +whether Jesus of Nazareth was the Christ or not. One who admitted this, +and received him in this character, had _faith_ in him, and might be an +accepted disciple. One who denied and rejected him, as the multitudes +did, was not, and could not be, so accepted. A man could not, in a word, +be a Christian disciple, without recognizing and believing in the +Founder of Christianity. + +[Footnote 18: Comp. Matt. xvi. 14-16; Acts ix. 22, xvi. 31; Rom. iii. +22, viii. 6, 9.] + +This explanation of the nature of the Faith of the Gospel will be found +to apply throughout the New Testament books. An illustration may be seen +in one of the most remarkable passages, the last twelve verses of St. +Mark's Gospel,--a passage, it should be noted, usually admitted to be of +later origin than the rest of the book. Here (v. 16) we read, "He that +believeth and is baptized shall be saved, but he that believeth not +shall be damned" (condemned). The meaning is explained by a reference to +the related passage, in chapter xxv. of the first Gospel. Here we learn +that at the second Advent, shortly to come to pass, those who, having +received Jesus as Lord, had approved themselves by their works obedient +and faithful disciples, would by him be recognized as his, and admitted +to share in the blessings of the promised kingdom of heaven: those who +had not done so should be rejected and driven from his presence. It is +clear that there is, in such ideas, no sufficient ground for supposing +faith or belief in a creed or a dogma to have been intended by the +writer of either Gospel. + +Let me further illustrate my meaning by a brief reference to an ancient +and, by many persons, still accepted formula of orthodox doctrine. This +professes to tell us very precisely what is the true Christian faith. In +plain terms it says, Believe this, and this, and this: believe it and +keep it "whole and undefiled;" unless you do so, "without doubt" you +shall "perish everlastingly." + +Now my proposition is, that this kind of statement, or any thing like +it, is not to be met with in the teaching of Christ, or in any other +part of the New Testament. Had it been otherwise,--had he plainly said +that the form of doctrine now referred to, or any other, was so +essential, there could have been no room for hesitation among those who +acknowledged him as Teacher and Lord. But he has manifestly not done +this, or any thing like this. Hence, as before, we are not justified in +thinking that the religion which takes its name from him, and professes +to represent his teaching, consists, in any essential degree, in the +acceptance, or the profession, of any such creed or system of doctrine, +exactly defined in words, after the manner of the churches,--whether it +may have come down to us from the remotest times of ante-Nicene +speculation, or only from the days of Protestant dictators like Calvin +or Wesley; whether it may have been sanctioned by the authority of an +[oe]cumenical council, so called, or by that of an imperial Parliament, +or only by some little body of nonconformist chapel-builders, who, by +putting their creed into a schedule at the foot of a trust-deed, show +their distrust of the Spirit of Truth, and their readiness to bind their +own personal belief, if possible, upon their successors and descendants +of future generations. + +We may then be very sure that, if the Christian Master had intended to +make the "salvation" of his followers dependent upon the reception of +dogmas, whether about himself or about Him who is "to us invisible or +dimly seen" in His "lower works," he would not have left it to be a +question for debate, a fertile source of angry contention or of +heartless persecutions, as it has often virtually been, _what_ the true +creed, the distinctive element of his religion, really is. The very fact +that this _has_ been so much disputed, that such differences do now so +largely exist before our eyes, forms the strongest possible testimony to +the non-dogmatic character of the primitive or genuine Christianity. The +same fact ought to rebuke and warn us against the narrow sectarian +spirit in which existing divisions originate, and which is so manifestly +out of harmony with "the spirit of Christ." + + +II. + +This absence from the Christian records of all express instruction, on +the subjects above noticed, clearly warrants us in turning away from any +merely dogmatic or ecclesiastical system, if it be urged upon us as +constituting the substance, or the distinctive element of Christianity. +We are thus of necessity led to look for this in something else. But to +what else shall we turn? In what shall we find an answer to our inquiry, +as to the true idea of the Christian Gospel? + +The reply to this question is not difficult. The true idea of Christ's +religion can only be found in the life and words of the Master himself. +And these it may well be believed, in their simple, rational, spiritual, +practical form, are destined to assume a commanding position among +Christian men which they have never yet held, and, in short, to suppress +and supersede the extravagancies alike of ritualism and its related +dogmatism, whatever the form in which these may now prevail among the +churches and sects of Christendom. + +This conclusion is readily suggested, or it is imperatively dictated, by +various expressions in the New Testament itself. "Lord, to whom shall we +go? Thou hast the words of eternal life:"--such is the sentiment +attributed to the Apostle Peter by the fourth Evangelist. Paul has more +than one instance in which he is equally explicit: "Other foundation +can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ;" while in +another place he writes, "If any man have not the spirit of Christ, he +is none of his." Jesus himself speaks in terms which are even more +decided, when he declares, "_I_ am the Way, the Truth, and the +Life."[19] + +[Footnote 19: John vi. 68; 1 Cor. iii. 11; Rom. viii. 9; John xiv. 6.] + +In such expressions as these we may, at the least, plainly see the +surpassing importance, to the judgment of the earliest Christian +authorities, of the personal Christ, of his teaching and example. We are +thus emphatically taught, in effect, that we must look to CHRIST, and +take HIM, in his life, his words, his devout and holy spirit, as the +impersonation of his religion. When it is asked, then, What is the true +idea of Christianity, no better answer can be given than by saying, it +is Christ himself; that it is _in_ Christ himself, in what he was and +says and does, in all that made him well pleasing in the sight of God, +as the beloved Son of the Almighty Father. + +What Jesus was, in his visible life among men, we learn from the Gospel +records. We learn it from them alone; for nowhere else have we +information respecting him that deserves to be compared with theirs in +originality or fulness of detail. It is not necessary to our present +purpose to enter at length into the particulars which they have +preserved for us, or into the differences between the three synoptical +Gospels and the Fourth, in regard to the idea which they respectively +convey of the ministry of Christ. The latter Gospel, it may, however, be +observed, is usually admitted to be the last of the four in order of +time. It is also, without doubt, the production of a single mind; and +cannot be supposed, like the others, simply to incorporate, with little +change, the traditions handed down among the disciples, for perhaps a +long series of years before being committed to writing. But whatever +accidental characteristics of this kind may be thought to belong to the +respective Gospels, they all agree in the resulting impression which +they convey, as to the high character of Jesus. And, it will be +observed, they do this very artlessly, without any thing of the nature +of intentional effort or elaborate description. They state facts, and +report words, in the most simple manner, often with extreme vagueness +and want of detail. It thus, however, results, that the image of Christ +which the Evangelists, and especially the first three, unite to give us +is, above all things, a moral image only; in other words, it has been +providentially ordered that the impression left upon the reader is +almost entirely one of moral qualities and of character. + +It may even be true, as some will tell us, that we have in each of the +first three Gospels, not simply the productions of as many individual +writers, but rather a growth or a compilation of incidents, discourses +and sayings from various sources, and drawn especially from the oral +accounts which had long circulated among the people, before they were +put together in their present form. But even so, the result is all the +more striking. The identity and self-consistency of the central object, +the person of Christ, is the more remarkable. Such qualities lead us +safely to the conclusion that one and the same Original, one great and +commanding personality, was the true source from which all were more or +less remotely derived. Hence, even the imperfect or fragmentary +character of the Gospel history becomes of itself a positive evidence +for the reality of the life, and the peculiar nature of the influence, +of him whose career it so rapidly, and it may be inadequately, places +before us. + +It is, however, to be distinctly remembered that we reach the mind of +Christ only through the medium of other minds. So far as can now be +known, no words of his writing have been transmitted to our time, or +were ever in the possession of his disciples. To some extent, therefore, +it would appear, the thoughts of the Teacher[20] may have been affected, +colored and modified, by the peculiar medium through which they have +come down to us. Under all the circumstances of the case, this inference +is natural and justifiable. It is one too of some importance, inasmuch +as it directly suggests that, in all probability, the actual Person +whose portraiture is preserved for us by the Evangelists must have +surpassed, in his characteristic excellences, the impression which the +narratives in fact convey. The first generation of disciples were +evidently men who were by no means exempt from the influence of the +national feelings of their people, or of the peculiar modes of thought +belonging to their class. In the same degree in which this is true, they +would be unable rightly to understand, and worthily to appreciate the +teaching and the mind of Christ. This remark applies perhaps more +especially to the first three Gospels, but it is not wholly inapplicable +to the Fourth. Indeed, the fact referred to comes prominently out to +view at several points in the Evangelical narrative,--as in the case of +Peter rebuking his Master for saying that he must suffer and die at +Jerusalem; in that of the request made by the mother of Zebedee's +children; and in the anticipations ascribed by the first three +Evangelists to Jesus himself, of his own speedy return to the +earth,--anticipations which are recorded very simply, and without any +corrective observation on the part of the writer.[21] + +[Footnote 20: The term _Teacher_ is constantly used of Christ in the +Gospels, though usually disguised in our English version under the +rendering "Master." Comp. e.g. Mark ix. 17, 38; Luke x. 25.] + +[Footnote 21: Matt. xvi. 22, xx. 20, xxiv. 24-36; Mark viii. 31-33, x. +35-45, xiii. 24-30; Luke xviii. 31-34.] + +But, whatever the hindrances of this kind in the way of a perfectly just +estimation by the modern disciple, the portrait of Christ preserved for +us by the Evangelists is, in a remarkable degree, that of a great +Religious Character. The Christ of the Gospels is, before all things, a +Spiritual Being, unpossessed, it may even be said, of the personal +qualities which might mark him off as the product of a particular age or +people. He is, in large measure, the opposite of what the disciples were +themselves, free from the feelings and prejudices of his Jewish birth +and religion. This he evidently is, without any express design of +theirs, and by the mere force of his own individuality. He is thus, in +effect, the Christ[22] not merely of his immediate adherents, or his own +nation, but of all devout men for all ages. He stands before us, in +short, so wise, and just, and elevated in his teaching, so upright and +pure in the spirit of his life, so engaging in his own more positive +example of submission to the overruling will, and touching forbearance +towards sinful men, that innumerable generations of disciples, since his +death, have been drawn to him and led to look up to him even as their +best and highest human representative of the Invisible God Himself. + +[Footnote 22: That is to say, "anointed," or _King_,--in other words, +Leader, Teacher, Saviour from sin, as the Gospels also expressly term +him.] + +It is very probable, however, that all this was not so fully seen by +those who stood nearest to Jesus during his brief and rapid career, as +it has been since. At least many, even the vast majority of his day, +failed to perceive it. And yet, to a Hebrew reader of the Gospels, the +greatness of his character could be summed up in no more expressive +terms than by claiming for him that he was the Christ; that he embodied +in himself the moral and intellectual pre-eminence associated with that +office. In this light he is especially represented in the first three +Gospels. In John, too, we have substantially the same thing, though very +differently expressed. In that Gospel, he is also the Christ, but he is +so by the indwelling of the divine Word. "The Word became flesh and +dwelt among us," and the glory which had been seen among men, "full of +grace and truth," was the glory even "as of the only-begotten of the +Father." Probably no language could have been used that would have +conveyed to a reader of the time a higher idea of the moral and +spiritual qualities of any human being. And this corresponds entirely +with the impression given by other writers of the New Testament, to some +of whom Jesus was personally known,--by Peter, for example, by James, by +Paul, and by the writer to the Hebrews. They evidently looked back to +their departed Master, and up to the risen Christ, as a person of +commanding dignity and spiritual power, and this not merely on account +of the official title of Messiah which, rightly or wrongly, they applied +to him, but for the lofty moral virtues with which his name was to them +synonymous.[23] He "who did no sin, neither was guile found in his +mouth," was, without doubt, the most perfect example which they could +cite of all that was acceptable in the sight of God. "The spirit of +Christ," without which we are "none of his," could be nothing else, and +nothing less, than a participation in Christ-like goodness; nor can it +therefore possibly be wrong, if we too lay the main emphasis of the +Christian profession precisely _here_, where it is laid by the apostles; +if, in other words, we pass over, or leave out of sight, as altogether +of secondary importance, or of none, those various and often conflicting +dogmas and forms and "diversities of administration," about which the +Christian world is so sorely, and for the present, so irreparably +divided. + +[Footnote 23: 1 Pet. ii. 21, seq.; iv. 1-5, 13-16; James ii. 1, seq.; +Gal. vi. 22-24; Eph. iv. 13-15 and _passim_; Phil. i. 27, seq.; ii. +1-11; Rom. xiii. 14; 2 Cor. iv.] + +The character of Christ stands in very intimate relations with the +miraculous powers attributed to him by the Gospels. Those powers, it is +needless to say, have been seriously called in question, as actual facts +of history, by the critical investigations of recent times. Many +persons, it may be, cannot see, and will not admit, that their value has +been affected by the inquiries alluded to. To such persons the miracles +will naturally retain whatever efficacy they may be conceived to possess +as evidence of the divine, that is, supernatural, claims of him who is +recorded to have wrought them. They are entitled to their own judgment +in the case, as well as to whatever support to Christian faith they +think they can derive from such a quarter. At the same time other +inquirers may be permitted to think differently. If the lapse of time +and the increasing grasp and penetration of critical knowledge +necessarily tend to lessen the certainty of the miraculous element of +the Evangelical history, may not this too be a part of the providential +plan--contemplated and brought about for great and wise ends? May it +not be that now the spiritual man shall be left more entirely free to +discern for himself the simple excellence of the Christian teaching and +example? left increasingly without that support from the witness of +outward miracle which has usually been deemed so important, and which is +unquestionably found to be the more commonly thus estimated, in +proportion as we descend into the lower grades of intelligence and moral +sensibility.[24] + +[Footnote 24: In illustration of this remark, it is scarcely necessary +to mention the "miracles" of the Roman Catholic Church in all ages.] + +But, on the other hand, if this be true, one who may thus think need not +of necessity also hold that the miracles of the Gospels did not take +place, but that the history relating to them is the mere product of weak +and credulous exaggeration. For, in truth, the ends which might be +subserved by such manifestations are easily understood. Occurrences so +unwonted and remarkable could not fail both to secure the attention of +the spectator, and make him ponder well upon the words of the +miracle-worker, and also to awaken in him new feelings of reverence +towards the mysterious Being who had given such power to men. Thus it is +readily conceivable, that a miracle might be a thing of the highest +utility to those who witnessed it and to their generation. But then, on +the other hand, it is not to be alleged that such occurrences are needed +now to show us that God is a living Spirit in the world; or, +consequently, that religious love and veneration are in any way +dependent upon them, either as facts beheld by ourselves, or as +incidents recorded to have been seen by others who lived many centuries +ago. And, if this be so, surely we may look with indifference upon the +most destructive operations of literary or scientific criticism, being +anxious only, and above all things, for the simple truth, whatever it +may be. + +Again, however, it is not to be denied that the possession of miraculous +power may have been for Christ himself, not less than for those who saw +his works, of the deepest spiritual import. The formation of a character +like his would seem peculiarly to require the training that would be +afforded by such an endowment. We know how, with ordinary men, the +command of unlimited power is, in fact, a test of rectitude, +self-government, unselfishness, of the most trying and, it may be, most +elevating, kind. The temptations which necessarily accompany it are +proverbial. Was Christ exempt from that kind of moral discipline, that +supreme proof of fidelity to God? Allowing, for a moment, what the +narratives directly intimate, that he felt within himself the force of +miraculous gifts, and the capacity to use them, if he had so willed, for +purposes either of personal safety or of political ambition;[25] in +this, we may see at once, there would be an end to be served of the +greatest moment both to himself and to the future instruction of his +disciples. By such an experience, the moral greatness of his example +might be doubly assured. It would be made possible to him to deny and +humble himself,--even, in apostolical phrase, to "empty" himself of his +Messianic prerogatives, in order the better to do the Heavenly Father's +will, and, preferring even the cross to a disobedient refusal of the cup +which could not pass from him, to be "made perfect through suffering," +thus showing himself worthy to be raised up at last to be, as he has +been, the spiritual Lord of the Church. + +[Footnote 25: Matt. iv. 1, seq.] + +This idea was, in fact, a familiar one to Paul, as to others of the +Christian writers.[26] Its literal truth is enforced by the +consideration of the strange improbability that one by birth a Galilean +peasant, without any special gifts or powers to recommend him to the +notice of his people, should yet be acknowledged by many of them as the +promised Messiah; should, in spite of an ignominious death, be accepted +in that character by multitudes; and finally, in the same or a still +higher character, should acquire the love and reverential homage of half +the world. + +[Footnote 26: 2 Cor. viii. 9; Eph. i. 20-23; Phil. ii. 5-11; Heb. ii. 9, +10, 18; 1 Pet. ii. 21.] + +And yet it may remain true that, as time passes, this consideration +shall lose much of its weight, in the judgment of increasing numbers of +earnest inquirers. They, accordingly, will cease to place reliance on +the outward material sign. Jesus, nevertheless, may still be to them as +an honored Master and Friend, whose name they would gladly cherish, for +what he is in himself. To those who thus think his character and words +will appeal by their own intrinsic worth. He will be Teacher, Saviour, +Spiritual Lord, simply by the inherent grace and truth spoken of by the +Evangelist of old. + +If this be the destined end, we may gladly acknowledge the providential +guiding even in this; and we shall certainly guard ourselves against +judging harsh or uncharitable judgment in reference to those who on this +subject may not see as we see, or feel as we feel;--who, nevertheless, +in thought and deed and aspiration, may not be less faithful to Truth +and Right, or less loyally obedient to all that is seen to be highest +and best in Christ himself. + + +III. + +Christ, then, I repeat, thus standing before us in the Evangelical +records of his ministry, is the impersonation of his religion. What we +see in Him is Christianity. Or, if it be not so, where else shall we +look with the hope to find it? Who else has ever had a true _authority_ +to place before us a more perfect idea, or to tell us more exactly what +the Gospel is? The _Church_, indeed, some will interpose, has such +authority! But examine this statement, and its untenable character +speedily appears. The Church at any given moment is, and has been, +simply a body of fallible mortals, like ourselves. If the Christian men +of this present day cannot suppose themselves to be preserved from +intellectual error in matters of religion, neither can we think the +Christian men of the past to have been more highly privileged. In fact, +it must be added, as we ascend into the darker periods of Church +history, we come upon the most undeniable traces of ignorance, +misunderstanding, worldliness and folly, on the part of the +ecclesiastics of the early and the middle ages, such as deprive their +judgments on the subject before us of all right or claim to unquestioned +acceptance. Let any one read, for example, the accounts given by +trustworthy historians[27] of that great assembly of the Church which +produced the Nicene Creed. Will any one allege that in the passion and +prejudice, the smallness of knowledge, the subtlety of speculation, and +narrowness of heart, pervading the majority of that assembly, the Divine +Spirit was peculiarly present to dictate or guide the decision arrived +at, and make it worthy of the blind adhesion of future Christian +generations? And, if we cannot thus admit the peculiar idea of +Christianity _there_ approved, it will surely be in vain to look to any +similar quarter, either of the past or of the present, for what shall +supersede the living "grace and truth," seen in Christ himself. + +[Footnote 27: E.g., in Dean Stanley's _History of the Eastern Church_.] + +This conclusion is greatly strengthened by the briefest reference to the +negative results of unbelief and irreligion, so prevalent in those +countries which have been the longest under the influence of the old +ritualistic idea of the Church and the priesthood. Positively speaking, +this idea, it is needless to add, has largely failed in almost every +thing except the encouragement among the people of the grossest +superstitions[28]--superstitions of which there is no trace whatever in +immediate connection with the Christian Master. Not, however, to dwell +in detail on this unpromising theme, let us rather turn to the +considerations by which our leading position may be confirmed; from +which too we may learn that a better future is yet in store for us. + +[Footnote 28: A good authority has recently observed, "Catholicism, +substituted for Christ, has turned the thought of Southern Europe to +simple Infidelity, if not to Atheism; let us take heed that +Protestantism does not bring about the same thing in another way in the +North."--Bishop Ewing, in a _Letter_ to the Spectator newspaper, April +8, 1870. The remark here quoted is of much wider application than the +Bishop himself would probably admit!] + +The experience of past ages, the existing sectarian divisions of +Christendom, the errors and superstitions involved in the grosser +assumptions of Church authority, all unite to compel us to the +conclusion of the essentially erroneous character of the old ritualistic +and dogmatic conceptions of the nature of the Gospel. They show us not +only that dogmas and rites about which the most earnest men are so +utterly at variance cannot possibly be of the essence of Christianity, +but further that the latter is nowhere to be found except in Him whom in +spite of diversities all alike agree to hold in honor. And, in truth, +his life, brief and fleeting as it was, may well be said to constitute +the Christian revelation. That it does so, and was intended to do so, +may, as already observed, be seen better in our day, than it was by the +earliest disciples. Their thoughts were preoccupied, their vision +obscured, by various influences which prevented them from clearly +discerning the one thing needful. The temporal kingdom of their Master +for which they were, many of them, so eagerly looking; his speedy return +to judge the world,--an expectation of which there are so many traces in +Gospels and Epistles alike; the great and urgent question of the Law and +its claims, with that of the admission of the Gentiles to the faith of +Christ without the previous adoption of Judaism;--such thoughts and such +cares as these largely engaged and filled the minds of the disciples, +within the limits of the period to which the origin of the principal New +Testament books must be assigned. After the close of that period, fresh +subjects of controversial interest continually arose, until these were +gradually overshadowed by the rising authority of the Church and the +later growth of sacerdotal power, followed in due course of time by the +grosser corruptions of the primitive Gospel which marked the +Christianity of the darker ages, and which have by no means as yet spent +their power. Thus has it pleased the Great Disposer that men should be +led forward to truth and light through error and darkness. Even as the +Hebrews of old were gradually brought by many centuries of experience, +and in the midst of imperfections and backslidings innumerable, to their +final recognition of the One Jehovah, so have the Christian generations +been slowly learning and unlearning according as their own condition and +capacities allowed. Thus the great development has been running its +destined course, and will doubtless conduct us eventually to yet better +and truer ideas of what the Almighty purposes had, in Christ, really +designed to give to the world. + +To vary the form of expression, the life of Christ itself constitutes +the revelation of His will which the Almighty Father has given to man by +His Son. And that life does constitute a revelation, in the most full +and various import of this term. It shows us, in a clear and engaging +light, the One God and Father of all, the Just and Holy One, who will +render to every man according to his deeds. It shows us the high powers +and capacities of man himself; for, while and because it tells him to be +perfect even as the Father in Heaven is perfect, it not only recognizes +in him the capability to be so, but also abundantly affords the +spiritual nutriment by which the higher faculties of his nature may be +nurtured and strengthened within him. It shows us how to live a life of +religious trust and obedience to the commands of duty, and, amidst many +sorrows and trials, still to preserve a soul unstained by guilt. It +shows us that this high devotion to the sacred law of Truth and Right is +that which is well pleasing to God; and that His will is that man should +thus, by the discipline of his spirit, join the moral strength and +sensibility in this world which shall fit him, if he will, to enter upon +the higher life of the world to come. All this we see plainly expressed +and announced in Christ, constituting him the _Revealer_ in the best +sense of this term. All this we do see, even though it may be very hard +to find any doctrinal creed laid down in definite words, or any system +of rites and ceremonies of worship, of Church government, or of priestly +functions and dignities, placed before us as constituting an +indispensable part of our common Christianity. + +And it is here an obvious remark that, while Christian men have so often +questioned and disputed with one another about the essentials of their +religion; while they have sometimes, again, been forgetful of its +spirit, in their controversies as to its verbal and written forms,--all +this time they have been substantially agreed as to the matters which +are the greatest and weightiest of all. About the Gospel as embodying +and expressing man's faith in God and in heaven, and as setting forth +the highest moral law with its exemplification in an actual human life; +about the Gospel in these, which are surely its most serious and +interesting aspects, there has been no dispute. The great spiritual +principles taught by Christ, and the power of his practical exhibition +of human duty, have been constantly admitted and--may it not be +added?--constantly felt in the world, among all the sects and parties of +Christendom, in spite of the differences of forms and creeds which have +separated men from each other. + +This fact suggests a further consideration of obvious interest. Regarded +as a dogmatic or an ecclesiastical system, the Gospel is one of the +greatest failures which the world has seen, no two sects or churches, +scarcely any two congregations, being agreed as to some one or other of +what are deemed its most essential elements. Regarded as a moral and +spiritual energy and instructor among men, it is and always has been a +quickening power,--tending directly, in its genuine influences, to +support and to guide aright, and, even amidst the worst distractions or +perversions of human passion and error, whispering thoughts of hope, +comfort, and peace, to many troubled hearts. This should not be +forgotten in our estimates of the part played by Christianity in past +times, or in the judgments sometimes so lightly uttered by a certain +class of its critics, who show themselves so ready to confound the +religion with its corruptions, and to include it and them in one +indiscriminate condemnation. It should help to call us back to juster +views of the nature and the function of Christ's religion, and lead us +the better to see that these consist, not in its capacity or its success +as an imposer of dogmas or of ceremonial acts to be received and +carefully performed by either priests or people, but in its power to +strengthen with moral strength, to guide in the path of duty, to save us +from our sins, to breathe into us the spirit of Christ, and so to bring +us nearer to God. Such is the true function and the real power of the +Gospel, even though it may constantly have had to act in the midst of +gross ignorance, or of false and exaggerated dogmatic conception; nor is +it too much to say that this its highest character has not been +altogether wanting to it, even in the darkest periods of man's +intellectual experience, during the last eighteen centuries. + +And not only is this so; but, further, it is evidently not through the +_peculiar_ doctrines of his church or sect that a man is most truly +entitled to the name of Christian, but rather by his participation in +what is _common_ to all the churches and sects which are themselves +worthy of that name. For let us call to mind, for a moment, some of the +more eminent Christian men and women of modern times, to whatever +sectarian fold they may have owned themselves to belong. Recall the +names of a Fénelon, an Oberlin, a Vincent de Paul, a Xavier, a +Melancthon, a Milton, a Locke, a Chalmers, a Clarkson, a Wilberforce, a +Mrs. Fry, a Keble, a Heber, a Wesley, a Lardner, a Priestley, a +Channing, a Tuckerman, with innumerable other true-hearted followers of +him who both bear witness to the truth, and "went about doing good." In +such persons we have representatives of nearly all the churches, with +their various peculiarities of doctrinal confession. And must we not +believe that such men and women were true Christians? If so, will it not +follow that in every one of their differing communions true Christians +are to be found? Probably no man, unless it be one of the most bigoted +adherents of Evangelical or high Anglican orthodoxy, would venture to +deny this. There are, then, good Christians, let us gladly admit, in all +the various sects and parties of Christendom; men whom Christ himself, +if he were here, would acknowledge and welcome as true disciples. But +what is it that entitles such persons all alike to the Christian +character and name? It cannot be any thing in which each _differs_ from +the rest, but rather something which they all have in common. It cannot +be any thing that is peculiar to the Roman Catholic alone, for then the +Protestant would not have it; nor any thing that is peculiar to the +Protestant alone, for then the Roman Catholic would not have it; nor any +thing that is peculiar to the Trinitarian alone, for then the Unitarian +would not have it. It must be something apart from the distinctive creed +of each. It is then something which all must possess, otherwise they +would not be truly Christian; which they must have in _addition_ to +their several distinguishing doctrines,--in company with which the +latter may indeed be held, but which is not the exclusive property of +any single church, or sect, or individual, whatever. + +What then do all the Christian sects and parties, of every name, hold in +common, and never differ about? Is it not simply in this, that they +receive and reverence Jesus as the beloved Son in whom God was well +pleased? that they hold the Christian faith in the Father in Heaven, +with all that this involves of love to God and love to man? that they +accept the law of righteousness, placed before us in the "living +characters" of Christ's own deeds and words, and strive to obey it in +their conduct? that they hold the same common faith as to the presence +and the providence of God, the future life and the judgment to come? +This Christian allegiance, it is true, is expressed under the most +different forms of statement, and in many a case it may hardly be +definitely expressed at all; but yet even this, and such as this, is, by +belief and practice, the common property of every Christian man; and so +far as he lives in the spirit of this high faith is he truly a disciple +and no further whatever may be the church or sect, or forms of doctrine +and worship, to which he may attach himself. And all this, I repeat, is +most plainly revealed to us in the spirit and the life of +Christ,--insomuch that we feel the statement to be incontrovertibly +sure, that he is the truest Christian of all whose practical daily +spirit and conduct are the most closely and constantly animated and +governed by the spirit and precepts and example of the Master Christ. + +It seems strange, when we think about it, that men should have gone so +far astray, in times past, from the more simple and obvious idea of +Christianity thus laid before us. We may have difficulty in explaining +how this has come to pass; how it is that so much of the weight and +stress, as it were, of the Christian religion should have been laid upon +obscure metaphysical creeds and dogmas, the obvious tendency of which +is, and always has been, to divide men from each other, to degenerate +into gross superstition, and destroy the liberty "wherewith Christ has +made us free," and which, moreover, are nowhere contained in the +Scriptures, and cannot even be stated in the language of the Scriptures; +how it is, again, that so little emphasis should be laid in these +dogmatic formulas upon that obedience which is better than sacrifice, +even that doing the Heavenly Father's will, which--strange to tell!--is +the only condition prescribed by Christ for entering into the kingdom. + +Truly this question is not without its perplexities. But some +explanation may be found. It is the obvious law of Divine Providence, it +is and has been a great law of human progress, that Truth shall not be +flashed upon the mind at once, either in religion or in any other of the +great fields of interest and occupation to man; but that it shall be +conquered and won through the medium of slow and gradual approach, even +in the midst and by the help of misunderstanding and error. It is thus, +doubtless, that men are trained to appreciate rightly the value of the +truths and principles which they ultimately gain. In other words, past +experience goes far to show us that moral excellence and the +apprehension of truth, by such a being as man, can only be acquired by +means of previous conflict with evil and untruth, in some one or other +of their manifold forms; or, if not by an actual personal conflict for +each of us individually, at least by means of the observed or recorded +experience of others, more severely tried than ourselves. + +Thus it has doubtless been with the reception and gradual prevalence of +Christian truths and principles. Men have had slowly, by a varied and +sometimes painful experience, to learn that it is not by saying, Lord, +Lord, by confessing some formal creed, or being included within the +limits of some visible church; not by forms and ceremonies of any kind, +such as baptism at the hands of a priest, or the confession of sin into +his ear, that we may become truly recipients of the light and strength +of the Gospel of Christ; but much rather by personal communion with the +Spirit of God, by doing the things which the Lord hath said, by striving +to be like Christ, in heart and in life, active in goodness, submissive +to the Heavenly Father's will, and ready to the work of duty which He +has given us to do. + +In proportion as this conception of Christianity comes forward into +view, and assumes the pre-eminence to which it is entitled, and which is +either implied or expressly declared in the principal writings of the +New Testament, in the same degree must the merely dogmatic and +sacerdotal idea sink into insignificance. It will be seen that moral and +spiritual likeness to the Christian Head is what is all-important; and, +consequently, that within the limits of the same communion, bound +together by the common principle of Christian faith,--the principle of +love and reverence for the one Master, Christ,--there may exist the most +complete mental freedom, and even, to a very large extent, the most +diverse theological beliefs. + + +IV. + +But here I may be met by certain objections which will hardly fail to +occur to different classes of readers. + +In the first place, it may be said, the idea of the Gospel above +presented is itself dogmatic; and indeed that the conception of +Christianity as involving definite forms of doctrine is not to be got +rid of. This remark I am by no means concerned wholly to escape. +Doubtless the Gospel, as it is given in the words of Christ, includes +various clearly stated truths respecting the Divine Providence and Will, +and the retributions of this world and the next,--truths, I may add, +which are not only level to the apprehension of the human faculties, but +also in harmony with the highest dictates of the natural conscience and +reason of man. But these great truths are not dogmatically laid before +us in the Gospel. The mind of each reader is left free to gather them +for itself. They are so stated as to quicken and elevate, not to stupefy +or render useless, the religious and moral sense of the disciple. They +serve thus, in the result, to arouse in him the strength of deep +individual conviction, without which they could have little practical +value. The teaching function of the Gospel is of _this_ kind, rather +than dogmatic and denunciatory, in the manner of the creeds. It does not +attempt to put before us a ready-made body of doctrine, in such a way as +to save the disciple the trouble of inquiry and reflection for himself, +as though it would make him the mere recipient of what is imposed upon +him from without. Not in this mechanical way, either in the world of +outward nature, or in the Gospel of His Son, does the Great Parent speak +to the hearts of His children; but chiefly by awakening their higher, +devouter sensibilities, and letting them feel the force of truth and +right within their own secret spirits. No imposition from without could +fitly accomplish this divine work; and we may be well assured that no +man living, and no church or sect on earth, has a legitimate authority +to define exactly the limits within which Christian belief shall confine +itself, or beyond which belief shall not extend, without ceasing to be +Christian. Obviously and unquestionably Christ himself has nowhere +attempted to dictate his religion in such a way; neither has any of his +apostles, not even the ardent and impetuous Paul. On the contrary, the +latter, like his Master, constantly attaches the greatest importance to +the practical virtues, and to a devout spirit,--in no case making his +appeal to a dogmatic statement, or giving us to understand that he had +the least idea of any dogmatic system whatever, similar, in spirit or in +form, to the creeds of modern orthodoxy. + +A second objection may be urged by a defender of the prevailing forms +and dogmas of the churches. Such a person may say that, in taking Christ +as the measure and representative of his own religion, we leave out of +sight all that may have been contributed to its development by the +Apostles, to say nothing of their successors, and that the Epistles of +the New Testament contain much that is not met with in connection with +him. In reply, let it be observed in what terms the Apostles speak of +their Master, and of the obedience, the faith, and veneration due to +him. Paul, for example, in various forms, tells them to "put on the Lord +Jesus Christ;" to let his mind be in them, his word dwell in them +richly, to acquire his spirit, to follow him in love and self-sacrifice. +He will know nothing, he says, "save Jesus Christ, and him crucified;" +and we know how closely he treads in his Master's steps, in the +absolute preference which he gives to the Love which, he declares, is +greater than faith, and the very fulfilling of the law itself. The same +strain is held by others of the Apostles; and there can be no doubt that +Christ, under God, was constantly looked up to by them as the great +object of the faith, the love, and the imitation of every disciple. It +is true, indeed, that there are many things in the Apostolical writings +other than we find in connection with Christ's personal life; but these +will be found to belong, almost exclusively, to the peculiar +circumstances and controversies of the times succeeding his death. In +truth, they belong so entirely to them as to have little of practical +reference, or utility, beyond. Paul's Epistles, for instance, are full +of the long debated question as to the claims of the law upon Gentiles, +and the mystery which, he says, had been hidden "from the foundation of +the world," that the Messiah should be preached even to those who were +not of the fold of Israel. But these are only temporary incidents of the +early career of Christianity. They have no intimate connection with the +permanent influence of Christ; and we of modern times have little +concern with them, except only to be on our guard against letting them +unduly sway our judgment and turn us away from subjects of greater +consequence,--as too often has happened to the ingenious framers of +theological systems. Christianity, in a word, has been only perplexed +and impeded in its course, by those thoughtless or over-zealous +expounders who have insisted upon constructing schemes of orthodoxy out +of the antiquated disputes of Jews and Gentiles.[29] + +[Footnote 29: See, e.g., the Essay on the Death of Christ, in _Aids to +Faith_.] + +In all his Epistles St. Paul, in the true spirit of his Master, gives us +clearly to know what is of chief importance. After treating, as he +usually does, of the local and passing concerns and disputes which +engaged many of his correspondents, he never fails to turn at last to +speak of the practical goodness, the purity of heart and life, the +kindly affections towards one another, the reasonable service of love +and duty, by which the Christian disciple may be known, by which alone +he can present himself as a "living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto +God." In such qualities as these, the attainment or the practice of +which he so earnestly urges upon his friends, we have precisely what +constitute the most marked features in the life and the teachings of +Christ. Thus we are brought once more to the old conclusion that in +faithful loyalty to Christ, to the highest ideal presented to us of his +spirit and character, are to be found the true light and joy and peace +of the Christian Gospel. + +A third objection is of a different character. There are some things, it +will be said, in immediate connection with him whom we term Teacher and +Lord, some things in his words and ideas, if not in his actions, which +are far from being in perfect harmony with the highest truth, as known +to men in these later times. For example, when he speaks as though he +believed diseases and insanity to be caused by the presence of a devil, +or demon, in the afflicted person, are we to attach importance to this, +so as ourselves to think that such disorders are (or were) so +produced?--or shall we not rather follow the guidance of modern science, +and believe that the various infirmities which, in ancient times, were +attributed to evil spirits arose from natural causes, and that the +manner in which such things are spoken of in the New Testament is a +product simply of the imperfect knowledge of those days? + +In reply, there need be no hesitation in saying that we are bound, as +beings of thought and reason, to follow the best guidance which God has +given us, in these and all other subjects; and by the term _best_ can +only be understood that which commends itself most forcibly to our +rational intelligence. It can in no way be claimed for Christ that he +was intellectually perfect; that he did not share in the prevailing +beliefs of his countrymen, and partake even of their ignorance. Such a +claim as this is certainly nowhere advanced in the New Testament, but +the _contrary_; and those who, in our time, would bring it forward +should ask themselves whether, by so doing, they are most likely to +benefit, or to injure, the cause which doubtless they would desire to +support. Jesus himself makes no pretension to intellectual +infallibility, but lets us see, in no uncertain way, that he was not +unconscious of the limitation of his own knowledge.[30] + +[Footnote 30: Mark xiii. 32.] + +In general terms it may be added, the Gospel, when first preached in the +world, was necessarily adapted to the people to whom it was addressed. +It conformed, in many respects, to their ideas and modes of expression, +and also made use of these for its own ends. Had it not done so, how +could it have touched and moved them as it did, and as, through them, it +has touched and moved the world ever since? Jesus, therefore, himself, +and those who took up his work after him, were, in a large degree, men +of their own day, imbued with prevailing ideas and feelings, and +employing these in their speaking and preaching in the most natural +manner. Is it not even so with ourselves at the present moment? For how, +indeed, can it be otherwise? And if many of the primitive Christian +ideas were more or less erroneous and ill-founded, it is easy to +understand that, while the overruling Providence made them its +instruments for leading men on by degrees to something better, still it +can have been no part of the great design of God that misunderstanding +and ignorance should be removed by any other process than by the natural +growth of knowledge among men. They were not to be supernaturally +refuted, but left to be corrected in due course of time; and the needed +correction was and is to come even as men grow wiser and more thoughtful +and able to bear it. + +Hence, it is not to be questioned, many errors, chiefly of the +intellectual kind, attached to the early preaching of the Gospel, and +some certainly did to the words of Christ himself; just as very much of +human ignorance and prejudice has since and continually been involved in +the ideas prevailing as to the character and purposes of his religion. +As before observed, man has been made by his Creator to find his way up +to light and truth from the most imperfect beginnings, and by a +prolonged conflict against and amidst darkness and manifold error. Such +is our human nature, and the position which the Divine Will has assigned +to us. And so in the early ages after Christ there sprung up the +idolatrous worship of the Virgin Mary and of innumerable saints; nor is +the world yet free, though it is slowly freeing itself, from the +influence of these superstitions and their related errors of thought. +Successive generations inherit much of the evil as well as the good, the +ignorance as well as the knowledge, of those who have been before them. +Thus does the Almighty Father exercise and discipline his human family +in patience, in self-control, in the search after truth, even by letting +us suffer and work for the good fruits of knowledge and righteousness, +instead of giving them to the world at once without thought or effort of +our own. This is eminently true in connection with the whole course of +Christian development. In Christ's own teachings and those of the +Apostles, as time has amply shown, erroneous ideas were not wanting. +Peter denied his Master, and thought at first that only Jews could be +disciples. Both he and Paul, as well as James, with probably all the +early Christians, long cherished the hope of their Master's return to +the earth within that generation; a belief which is to be traced also, +equally with that in demoniacal possessions, in the recorded words of +Jesus himself. Other instances of a similar kind might easily be +mentioned. + +But, while all this seems perfectly undeniable, has not Divine +Providence so ordered that what is really wrong and false in men's ideas +of Christian truth shall sooner or later be seen in its real character, +in the advancing progress of human knowledge?--and therefore, if we are +ourselves only patient and faithful, each of us, to what we see, or +think we see, to be right and good, that the untrue in our ideas shall +be eventually separated from the true, however close may be the +connection which at any time may subsist between them? Such is, +doubtless, the Almighty purpose, such the all-sufficient process +provided in His wisdom for securing the training and growth of the races +and generations of men in the knowledge of Divine things. It follows, +again, that whatever in the Christian teaching, as in other teaching, +shall stand the test of advancing knowledge, and still approve itself +as true and honest and just and pure and lovely and of good report[31] +to the purified conscience and practised intellect of man, that shall be +God's everlasting Truth; that too He must have designed not only by the +word of Christ, but through the living souls of His rational children, +to proclaim to the world with the mark of His Divine approval. + +[Footnote 31: Philip. iv. 8.] + +It is not necessary here to ask in detail what it is in existing schemes +of Christian theology, or in the outward forms and arrangements of +priesthoods and of churches, that will bear this test of advancing +knowledge, and this scrutiny of the educated intellect and conscience. +Doubtless much in the popular creeds of our day will do so; but much +more will only be as chaff before the wind, or stubble before the +devouring flame. Among the perishable things will surely be the +ecclesiastical systems which vary with every different country and +church, and along with these the claims to priestly and papal authority +and infallibility, about which we again hear such angry contention. +Truly, none of these will bear the test and strain of time and +knowledge; but only those great and unchangeable principles of spiritual +truth, and those deep-lying sentiments of moral right, which are +_common_ to _all_ the different sects and parties of Christendom. These +will retain their place among the great motive forces of the world, even +because their roots are firmly planted by the Divine hand itself in the +very nature of man, and made to be a part of the constitution of his +mind; while, also, it is true, and the Christian disciple will ever +gratefully acknowledge, they owe their best and highest expression and +exemplification to Jesus the Christ, the "beloved Son," in whom God was +"well pleased." + +We may conclude then, as before, that in the mind and life of +Christ,--in his unshaken trust in the Heavenly Father, and in the heaven +to be revealed hereafter,--in his readiness to obey the call of Duty, +wherever it might lead him, even though it might be to the shame and the +agony of the cross,--in his faithful adherence to the right, and earnest +denunciation of falsehood, hypocrisy, and wrong-doing,--in his gentle +spirit of forgiveness and filial submission even unto death,--we have +the lessons of Christian truth and virtue which it most of all concerns +us to receive and to obey. In this high "faith of Christ" we have the +true revelation of God's will for man; the Gospel speaking to us in its +most touching and impressive tones,--either reproaching us for our +indifference and calling us to repentance, or else aiding and +encouraging us onward in the good path of righteousness. + +So long as Christianity shall be thus capable of speaking to the world, +so long will it, amidst all the varieties of outward profession, be a +living power for good; and vain will be the representation which would +tell us that it is now only a thing of the past, unfitted for the better +knowledge and higher philosophy of these modern times. Surely not +so!--but, rather, until we have each individually attained the moral +elevation even of Christ himself, and can say that we too, in character +and conduct, in motive and aspiration, are well pleasing in the sight of +Heaven, until we _are_ this, and can feel and say this with truth, the +religion of Christ will be no antiquated thing of the past to _us_; but +from its teaching and its spirit--the teaching and the spirit of +Christ--we shall still have wisdom and truth to learn. + +May the time speedily come, which shall see Christ's spirit ruling the +individual lives of all around us,--more truly inspiring the thoughts +and efforts of our lawgivers,--teaching men everywhere to be just and +merciful towards each other; and thus making Christianity, in deed and +in truth, the "established religion," the guiding and triumphant power +of this and all other lands! Then, indeed, will the daily prayer of all +Christian hearts be answered, and the "kingdom of heaven" on earth be +truly come. + + + + +THE AIM AND HOPE OF JESUS. + +By OLIVER STEARNS. + + +A learned Historian of the Christian Theology of the Apostolic age +observes that what most distinguishes the Jewish religion, at least in +its last centuries, is not so much monotheism as faith in the future. +While elsewhere we see the imagination of men complacently retracing the +picture of a golden age irrecoverably lost, Israel, guided by its +prophets, persisted in turning its eyes towards the future, and attached +itself the more firmly to a felicity yet to come, the more the actual +situation seemed to give the lie to its hopes.[32] + +[Footnote 32: Reuss, History of the Christian Theology of the Apostolic +Age.] + +What these hopes were in relation to the future of that people and of +the world, what the Messianic ideas and expectations were, we learn from +the New Testament, particularly from the Gospels. And we find our +impressions from this source made more clear in some points, and in all +confirmed, by a study of the Apocalyptic literature,--of those writings +of which it was the object to give both shape and expression to the +Hebrew thought of the kingdom of heaven, and of the brilliant and +miraculous events which would introduce and establish it. + +Jewish Theology in the age of Jesus Christ divided the whole course of +time into two grand periods; one, comprehending the past and the +present, was that of suffering and sin; the other, embracing the future, +a period of virtue and happiness. The last years of the former period +formed the most important epoch in the History of Humanity, the +transition to a new order of things, and was designated by a peculiar +phrase,--the consummation of the age and the last days. It would be +introduced by the appearance of the great Restorer or Deliverer of the +people of God, and of the world, whom the prophets predicted; and who +was called the Messiah, the Anointed of the Lord,--_i.e._, the King by +eminence, the King of Israel. He was to be the successor and the son of +David. The precise moment of his appearance was not known. The Jewish +theologians tried to determine the precursive signs of the near approach +of his advent. The first of these was the period of great wickedness and +suffering, marked by a particular name, the anguish, and compared to the +pangs of child-birth. Immediately preceding the advent of the King, a +prophet of the Old Covenant would be restored to life to announce it,--a +part in the miraculous drama commonly assigned to Elijah. The Messiah +himself would come on the clouds of heaven, with a retinue of angels, +and with a pomp and splendor which would leave no doubt of the fact of +his advent. He would come to found the kingdom of God. This implied the +political, moral, and religious regeneration of the people. A series of +most imposing scenes would follow the advent. At the sound of a trumpet, +the dead would arise and appear for the judgment of the last day. The +just would take part in the judgment of the reprobate, who would be +thrown into the lake of fire, prepared for the devil and his angels to +suffer eternal torture. And the kingdom of God or of the Messiah would +be established immediately on the earth, which, with the whole of the +universe of which it was the centre, would be gloriously transformed to +fit it to be the abode of the elect of God. + +Into the circle of these ideas and expectations Jesus was born. In it he +passed his life, acted and suffered; and claimed to found the kingdom of +God. He claimed in some sense to be the Messiah; and, though rejected by +his people and put to death, he has borne the name in history, and now +bears it. He is Jesus, the Christ. How did he regard these ideas and +expectations? Did he adopt them? And, if at all, how far? Did he claim +to be such a Messiah as the Jews expected? If so, then Christianity may +be what it has been called, "a natural development of Judaism." It is +not essentially a new religion. It is not an evolution of a perfect +universal, from an imperfect and partial, religion. It is essentially +Judaism still; and "the kingdom of God, which Jesus preached in both a +temporal and spiritual sense, developed naturally and logically into the +Popedom, which is the nearest approximation to the fulfilment of the +claim of Jesus. Judaism is germinal Christianity, and Christianity is +fructified Judaism." Christianity is only what is weakest and most +fantastic in Judaism gone to seed. _The fruit_ is the Roman Hierarchy +and Ritual. That which is alone characteristic of it is limited and +perishable. Jesus himself, though his ambition was a lofty one, was +mistaken in an essential point of his self-assertion; and the gospel is +not destined to be an universal religion, but only to make some moderate +contributions thereto. + +It is an important question, then,--one which concerns his worth and +position as a man, as well as his wisdom as a founder of a +religion,--What did Jesus aim at? and what did he expect as the result +of his movement? The answers that have been given may be reduced to +three principal forms: 1. He expected to found a political Empire; 2. He +expected to introduce a vast Theocracy, to which believers of other +nations should be admitted, and which was to be established on the +renovated earth, after his death, at his return to take possession of it +as King, to reward his followers, and to put all opposition under his +feet; 3. He expected to found a purely spiritual communion or society in +which he should continue to exercise for ages, by his spirit, word, and +life, a power of truth and love over the minds and hearts of men, +filling them with the most exalted sense of God. + +The first view has been presented by some able adversaries of +Christianity, among whom Reimarus led the way in a fragment "On the Aim +of Jesus," published with others anonymously in 1778. He charged Jesus +with using religious motives as merely a means to a political end; but +supposed that, after he found death impending, he renounced the +political aim, and pretended that his purpose was only a moral one. A +few able scholars have been disposed to blend the last view with the +others. They suppose an original Theocratic purpose to have been +entertained by Jesus, in which the moral and religious principle +predominated, but which was not at first exclusive of the political +element. They suppose, however, a progress in his aim; that after his +rejection by the people, "which he regarded as God's rejection of any +national limitation of his work," he inferred that his mission was to +found a spiritual kingdom. Though the direct imputation of a political +aim has not been a favorite expedient with ultra-rationalist critics +since Reimarus was answered by Reinhard and others, it ought not to be +passed without consideration. It is continually reappearing in modified +forms. And this happens, because it is impossible to present the +hypothesis that Jesus intended to be a Jewish Messiah without involving +the supposition of something political in his object, and in his means +of accomplishing it. Accordingly a very recent critic[33] of +Christianity, writing in the interest of "Free Religion," and +representing Jesus as claiming to be a Jewish Messiah, after saying very +truly that "the popular hope of a Priest-king transformed itself in the +soul of Jesus into the sublime idea of a spiritual Christ ruling by +love," is constrained to say, inconsistently, in another place, that, if +Jesus had assumed the office, he would not have hesitated to discharge +its political duties, and to exercise political sway. Here, then, is a +revival of the imputation to Jesus of a political aim. But I am not +aware that it is anywhere in recent criticism enforced with any new +strength of argument. It is obviously contradicted by the general +bearing of his actions, and by the whole tone of his teachings when +rightly apprehended. It is contradicted by his utter neglect of +political measures. He could not be induced or forced to take the +position of a political ruler. Admirers wished to proclaim him King: he +sent them away, tore his disciples from them, and went himself into the +mountain to commune with God. Asked to settle a dispute about property, +he says he has never been constituted an administrator of civil justice. +When shown the tribute-money, and inquired of if it were lawful to pay +tribute unto Cæsar, he makes the memorable reply in which he at once +acknowledges the rights of the government _de facto_; and the rights of +conscience and religion, which to deny would be usurpation. He was the +first to distinguish the spheres of the church and of the state so +intimately related, but never to be blended. And this is just what the +political Messiah, the Priest-king, could not have conceived. The +outlines of his church may serve as the model of a free church to-day. +There was no political motive to enter it. It had no officer who could +exercise political power. There was no authority but in the +congregation. It was amenable to no political head. Its fundamental +truths were the equal relation of all men with God as his children, and +the common relation of all men with one another as brethren. The only +end of his church was the moral and spiritual development of its members +and of all men; the only condition of membership, the recognition of +this end; and, with it, of the providential gift of truth and life given +in Jesus Christ's consciousness of God, and an appropriating and +co-operative sympathy with his character and purpose. Its method was +free conference and prayer in the spirit of unity, and in devotion to +the regeneration of the human family; a method, the results of which, he +assured them, would be the reaching of decisions which would be in +essential harmony with his own spirit, the Spirit of God. He drew more +from the synagogue than from the temple. Worship might ascend anywhere +from the heart. One need not go to Jerusalem. No political Messiah could +have thought of any centre of the restored Theocracy but the holy city, +to which the tribes should repair with their sacrifices, and the +converted heathen bring their votive offerings to Jehovah, the God of +Jews; but the temple must be destroyed, and not one stone of it left +upon another, according to Jesus, in order to prepare for that worship +of the Father by men in spirit and in truth, which he, as the Christ, +would inaugurate. + +[Footnote 33: See "The Index," Toledo, Jan. 1 and Jan. 8, 1870.] + +We thus come naturally to another point in the discussion. The theories +which recognize the political aim of Jesus commonly suppose that he +regarded it as his personal mission to restore Mosaism to its primitive +purity. And, if he shared in the hope of the restoration of the +Theocracy, he would probably take the most conservative ground in regard +to the Levitical institutions and the Mosaic precepts. He would believe +the Jewish people must be made independent, in order to give supremacy +to those institutions. The Roman yoke must be broken, and the coming +kingdom be inaugurated with war. Nothing of this, however, is found in +the ministry of Jesus Christ. When he preached "the kingdom of heaven is +at hand," it was no summons to war. The characteristic qualities of +those who belonged to this kingdom were opposed to the Theocratic +spirit. And the Sermon on the Mount taught, as clearly as the formal +declaration before Pilate, that it was not of this world. Why should his +followers be ready to suffer social persecution, if his aim tended in +the direction regarded with social favor? What mean the non-resistant +exhortations, instructing his followers to waive their rights for the +sake of the higher interests they were living for, if he and his +adherents are charged with the political duty of driving the invader +from the sacred soil? The rise and progress of this kingdom, Jesus said, +on another occasion, could not be observed like those of an empire +founded by force: it would not "come with observation." It had already +come unobserved. It began to come with John the Baptist, until whose +work the law was in the ascendant; but since whom men had been pressing +into the kingdom of heaven, which was tending to supplant the law. And, +on still another occasion, if he expected his movement to leave the +Jewish ritual intact, how could he say, with pregnant significance, that +new wine must not be put into old wineskins, lest they break, and the +wine be lost. I know great stress is laid upon his saying, "Think not +that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I have not come to +destroy, but to fulfil. For truly do I say to you, Till heaven and earth +pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall pass from the law, till all +be fulfilled." But, if taken literally, they prove too much; for, +according to other passages, his teaching on some points--as, for +instance, divorce, and, as many think, the Sabbath--directly conflicted +with that of Moses. He threw doubt directly upon the tradition that God +rested on the seventh day. God, he said, had been always working up to +that hour, and in his own acts of healing done on the Sabbath he had +been co-operating with God. We must therefore interpret freely this +language, and understand by it the everlasting law. The smallest +requirement of the true law, however overlooked and despised it may have +been in the popular exegesis, would have its emphasis in the new +teachings; and whoever slighted it would be the least in the kingdom of +heaven. There is not a word which can be fairly construed into +commendation of the Levitical priesthood. He gives to the Mosaic +precepts cited the most spiritual interpretation, or sets them aside +when they cannot be wrought into a more profound system of natural +morality. He implies his superiority to all preceding teachers, +including Moses. "It was said to the ancients, but _I_ say unto you." +Indeed, his tone in this discourse is any thing but that of a Jewish +Rabbi of his period. It is that of the most human and universal +teaching. It asserts, when we penetrate beyond the immediate occasion of +it to its principle, that which is true in all times and places. Those +affirmations with which it opens, what are they but declarations, the +substantial verity of which it is possible for every man, if he know not +now, yet sometime to know in himself. "Blessed are the poor in spirit: +for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." The spirit of those who can set a +limit to their wants and curb ambition, who do not live blinded by +interests to the demands of a pure soul,--the spirit of such is always +blessed. Happy he who imbibes it from the circumstances of his life; and +happy he who, amidst the blandishments of riches, is taught it by the +discipline of Heaven. These are they to whom has come the kingdom of +heaven from Jesus' day until now. Then, "Blessed are the pure in heart: +for they shall see God." And is not a pure mind the very moral +atmosphere in which man sees God as he is, and rejoices in the sight? A +man's moral sentiments are the medium through which comes to him the +thought of God. Let those sentiments be perverted, and he imagines +either that God is not or that he is different from what he is. His +wrong mind either obstructs entirely the beam which darts from the +Divine essence, or scatters the spotless white of that Sun, the pure +aggregate of Divine perfections, into the particolored tints of the +earthly and sensual soul itself. Again, "Blessed are the merciful: for +they shall obtain mercy." It is even so. Those who sympathize with +human wants will feel the sympathy of God flowing into their souls, and +can never lack assurance of the Divine mercy so long as they keep in +themselves that pledge of it,--the merciful spirit. And so it is a grand +caution, which every one who has wantonly condemned others knows he +ought to keep in memory,--"Condemn not, lest ye be condemned." For the +undeserved, heavy sentence of condemnation which a man lifts high to +hurl with malignant intent at his brother is arrested by an interposing +law of Providence, and falls from his weak hand with its full weight +upon his own head. And at length we come to what might be thought a +studied satire upon the boasted maxims of human wisdom: "Blessed are ye +when men shall speak evil of you falsely for my sake." Is this the sober +truth? Is not Christ, so true elsewhere, mistaken here? It is a verity +as certain as the laws of God. Do not minds advance unequally in truth, +in all the successive phases of a soul's spiritual growth? Whoever goes +before others in thought and life will find men laying this to his +charge. But, if by following the command of Christian truth to his +conscience he has opened upon himself the battery of human +censoriousness, he may exult; for every unjust word or groundless +suspicion will but remind him of his unbribed devotion, and be changed +before it touches his deepest happiness into the benediction of God. + +Were we to go through what was spoken on the Mount, we might show its +truth commanding unquestionably the assent of our moral natures. It all +takes hold of our mind and life. It comes to us to throw light on what +we do and suffer, and to borrow confirmation from it in turn. Though we +fall so far short of it, and could not have conceived it originally and +from ourselves, as Jesus did, it so accords with the laws of our being +as to seem to be the suggestion of our experience, some admonition +floating to us by intent of God on that ever-heaving sea of life, of +ambition, of passion, of mutual misunderstanding, of strong loves and +piercing griefs, of various mingling sympathies, on whose shore we do +now stand, and whose tide, for our few seconds here in time, laves our +feet and dashes upon us its spray. + +We might turn over other pages of Jesus' instruction beyond that +introductory statement of the principles of the kingdom of God, and +evolve its sense in terms presenting an undeniable spiritual fact to all +our race. For instance, "To him who hath shall be given, and he shall +have abundance; but from him that hath not shall be taken away, even +that which he seemeth to have." How true! It is verified in the mental +condition of every man at this moment. We only seem to have the faculty +we do not use. There is no long, healthy sleep to the mind and the moral +will any more than to the body; but the alternative is, live or die. And +thus Jesus was ever holding up the law of the spiritual life to the +light of that day which dawned with his advent. He dwelt on what is +inward. Although you cannot find that once, in his popular teaching, he +laid stress upon observances, times without number he studiously +distinguished between every thing of the nature of ceremonial and those +everlasting obligations of justice and humanity, of inward and outward +purity, which ought to be recognized in the home and in the state, in +all the intercourse of man with man, and in watching over the secret +heart. We may not infer that he was hostile to religious forms. He +observed them. He knew that man needed them, and that souls instinct +with life would perpetuate them and adapt them to their own wants. But +he saw in the spirit of the Scribes the evil of teaching that any +arbitrarily imposed outward act can in itself please God; and, in regard +to such, the whole emphasis of his teaching was, "These ought ye to have +done, and not to have left the other undone." He quoted from the +prophets habitually, "I will have mercy and not sacrifice." + +Such is the genius of Christianity,--of Christianity as it came from its +Founder,--the religion which is said to have ripened into the mediæval +theology and the Roman hierarchy. Too little, indeed, has this genius of +Christianity been regarded! The old Judaic spirit which brought Jesus to +the cross has, among Protestants as well as Catholics, too often +crucified the Christianity of Christ. Human metaphysics have been put +into creeds and catechisms. Sects have been founded and built up on the +importance attached to the form of a rite as a part of essential +Christianity. Disputes have raged which the traditions of the Church and +the letter of Scripture have failed to settle, and about which Jesus, if +teaching among us, would not waste a minute's breath. + +If further proof were wanting of the breadth and spirituality of Jesus' +view, it might be found in the fact that he was brought to the cross by +the pro-Judaism party. His friends would interpret him differently from +his enemies. The universality and spirituality of his aim were not at +once apprehended by his followers. Their very trust in him would make +them slow to perceive his radical meaning; for, to impute to him what +was in his mind, would seem to be distrust. They would put a limited +construction upon what he said. It would be otherwise with his enemies, +who would be sharp and quick to see the full extent to which his words +would carry him. + +The movement of Jesus, then, may be called revolutionary, not in the +sense of aiming directly at political revolution, but in the sense of +his expecting to found a free, spiritual, and universal religion, which +would uproot and remove in time the partial religions, Judaism included. +Still he designed to connect himself with the Old Dispensation. He +recognized the Divine mission of Moses and the Providential office of +the prophets in preparing for him. In the expectations which they +fostered there was something true as well as something false. When they +depicted a glorious and happy political condition of the Jewish nation +under the Messiah as an earthly king, Jesus must have regarded them as +being in error. We find him pronouncing John the Baptist the greatest of +the prophets of the old order, and declaring that the least in the +kingdom of heaven was greater than he; and the reason is shown by the +context of the words (Matt. xi.) to be that John as a Jewish prophet +regarded the kingdom of God in part as a political kingdom. But the +fundamental idea of the Theocracy, that other nations would be united +with Israel under the dominion of the One True God, was one in harmony +with Jesus' thought.[34] This expectation Jesus regarded it as his +mission to realize and fulfil. He had only to separate from the +Theocratic predictions of the prophets the partial political element, to +bring them into unison with his universal aim. Whatever in the hitherto +prevailing ideas and hopes was capable of expansion he absorbed into +himself, that it might be given out in a wider and higher form, and +live for ever. A case somewhat parallel might be found in the changes +wrought by our late war. Those who took a radical view of the issue of +the contest were exposed to the charge of being revolutionary and +destroying the Constitution. They could reply, "Yes: the issue will be +revolutionary. There will be a new state of law, and of the relations of +the people in important respects, effected by carrying out fundamental +principles. But those principles were the essence of the Constitution; +and to carry them out is only fully to accomplish its purpose, by +annihilating transient provisions at war with liberty and social +justice, and giving scope to the principles of the Declaration of +Independence. We hold to the Constitution. We have come not to destroy, +but to fulfil." So Jesus Christ came not to destroy all that had gone +before, but to fulfil whatever in it was fundamental to the Divine +purpose in relation to man. In this feeling of a real connection between +his movement and the Hebrew ideas and hopes is to be found the principal +explanation of his confining his labors, and those of the apostles when +first sent forth, chiefly to Judea and Galilee. Not only must his own +work be limited in its local scope,--for he could not go +everywhere,--but the historical basis of his movement lay in the Hebrew +history. Among the Hebrew people only could he find suitably prepared +immediate disciples. Salvation was to be from the Jews. And, foreseeing +that the nation as such would reject him, he saw that it was essential +to the extension among the Gentiles of the truths and hopes he inherited +as a Jew, essential to the breaking down of the partition wall which now +kept out the true doctrine of God from the heathen world, that he should +come to a distinct issue with the Jewish authorities, and make it clear +and notorious that it was the narrow spirit of Pharisaism and legal +formality which crucified him. (If he were lifted up, he would draw all +men to him.) And from the first the ruling sect, with the acute instinct +of self-interest, discerned the revolutionary character of his +movement,--that it elevated man above the Jew, and struck at the root of +the idolized Hebrew pre-eminence. + +[Footnote 34: See Noyes's Introduction to his Translation of the +Prophets.] + +I pass now to a more subtle hypothesis, that Jesus expected to establish +the Theocratic empire by angelic assistance on occasion of his return to +earth, which would occur at the same time with the great outward change +of the world. It is founded on such passages as this: "For the Son of +Man is to come in the glory of his Father, with his angels; and then he +will render to every one according to his works." (Matt. xvi. 27. Comp. +Matt. xiii. 41, and xxvi. 29-60.) It is thus stated by Strauss:[35] "He +waited for a signal from his heavenly Father, who alone knew the time of +this catastrophe; and he was not disconcerted when his end approached +without his having received the expected intimation." His Messianic hope +was not political or even earthly. He referred its fulfilment to a +supermundane theatre. + +[Footnote 35: Life of Jesus, Part II. § 66. The charge of enthusiasm is +retained, but not discussed, in his Life of Christ for the German +people.] + +Strauss speaks of Jesus' hope as corresponding with the Messianic ideas +of the Jews. It took its form from those ideas. Scherer also represents +Jesus' idea of the kingdom as wholly Apocalyptic. The _first_ criticism +to be made upon this hypothesis is, that a Theocratic idea arising out +of the Jewish expectations and conformed to them could not dispense with +all thought of earthly conflict. The struggle could not have been +altogether upon a supermundane theatre, nor the triumph of the Messiah +achieved without common warlike agencies. The common Jewish idea was +founded on the language of some Hebrew prophets, and appears in the +Apocalyptic writings of Christ's age; and his own mind in cherishing the +hope attributed to him must have quite surrendered itself to the popular +expectation. This expectation supposed some outward conflict as the +occasion of supernatural interference. Nor do I know any ground for +thinking that in Christ's time the Jews expected the Messiah to prevail +with angelic aid without a conflict of arms. Whoever will read Ezekiel +and Daniel will see that those prophets expected a contest on earth with +earthly weapons, as the occasion for the intervention of Jehovah. And +whoever will read the wars of the Maccabees will see how Jewish courage, +fired with the expectation of celestial assistance, never stopped to +compare the apparent strength of the respective forces. Nor did the +Apocalyptic seers dismiss this thought of earthly battle. The book of +Enoch speaks of the unconverted as delivered at the judgment into the +hands of the righteous, whose horses shall wade in the blood of sinners, +and whom the angels shall come to help.[36] The Apocalypse of the New +Testament presents the picture of the Messiah as mounted on a white +horse, and riding forth to judge and make war; and the comment of Dr. +Noyes on this and similar passages is that, in the mind of the writer, +there was to be war in heaven and upon earth, before Christ should reign +in final triumph.[37] This theory has no distinctive character without +supposing the angels acting on the stage of sense and time, and giving +the Hebrews the victory. With this expectation is probably connected the +"sign from heaven" demanded of Jesus by the Pharisees, a sign which +should stimulate Hebrew faith to irresistible warlike ardor. The +unconverted were to be vanquished by some mysterious exercise of +Messianic power. Hence many were not satisfied with Christ's miracles; +not that they disputed their reality, but as being not decisive of his +Messianic character. Now, if this had been the thought of Jesus, he +would have been disposed to seek an occasion for such interference from +on high. It is true, in saying this, we say he must have given himself +up to the enthusiasm which so often fanatically manifested itself in his +age, and was always ready to break forth. But the idea supposed, when +one's whole being was yielded to it,--as Jesus did yield his whole being +to the ideas which possessed him,--could not have stopped short of +practical action. He must have been prepared in his thought to act with +fanaticism. Strauss says, "He did not try to bring about all this by his +own will; but awaited a signal from his heavenly Father." The actual +Jesus did undoubtedly as Strauss says; but the supposed Jesus would have +at some time believed the signal to be given. The idea, and the sort of +faith in supernatural aid which accompanied it, would lead him to think +the moment had come for this demonstration. "If such were the ideal of +Jesus in fact, why did he not seek to realize it at once? Why did he +prefer the way of renunciation and self-sacrifice to the possession of +the kingdoms of the world? Why, in the place of the Son of Man, have we +not a Mahomet six hundred years in advance." The logical and necessary +result of belief in his Messiahship, and of faith in this sort of +supernatural aid in realizing it, was that he should bring about an +occasion for this demonstration. It was an encounter with the Romans, in +the hope that Jehovah and the angels would fight for God's people, and +be more than strong enough against all odds. "The Messianic Theocracy +could not exist as a Roman province."[38] But Jesus studiously avoids +conflict with Rome. Besides, the second part of the temptation of Christ +sets aside at once this ideal. His early consciousness of wonderful +power had not the effect of disposing his mind favorably toward such +Jewish Messianic ideas. That consciousness tended rather to spiritualize +his thought: we may say, it subdued him. It made his whole feeling +moderate, and his whole thought wise and temperate. This is a very +remarkable part of the representation of him by the evangelists. + +[Footnote 36: Book of Enoch, Dillman, ch. 100.] + +[Footnote 37: Rev. xix. 11; comp. Christian Examiner, May, 1860, p. +382.] + +[Footnote 38: Hase's Life of Jesus.] + +But, secondly, I will now suppose the expectation of Jesus to have been +purified from every notion of warlike action. The regeneration +(palingenesia) was to be not a political revolution, but a renovation of +the earth and the heavens, attended by a resurrection of the dead, of +whom the accepted were to dwell with Christ in the renovated world,--not +the present earth, but the earth restored,--and that his presence and +return were to be visible. This is his coming with the angels to set up +his kingdom and to reign. + +I. The very language which this hypothesis is adopted to explain, taken +in its proper sense, proves too much. Jesus was to be a king on the +renewed earth, yet his kingdom was to be different from those of this +world. "It is not," he says, "of this world." It is a real kingdom as +much as that of David; but it is not to be a worldly rule on the one +hand, nor a purely spiritual rule on the other. It is political, and not +political. According to the writer of the Apocalypse, whose views are +supposed to have been sanctioned by Jesus, this king must reign until he +has put all enemies under his feet. When the kingdom is consummated, he +is to surrender it to his Father. The hypothesis under consideration +represents the kingdom as to be consummated at the time of the +world-catastrophe which, with the second or real coming of Jesus as +Messiah, will occur, according to the alleged words of Christ himself, +immediately after the destruction of the city. Why shall not the kingdom +be given up immediately to the Father? This king in "the proper sense," +and in no purely spiritual sense, who comes visibly, will have no +occasion for a reign in the proper sense of the word. Strauss says, +"Jesus expected to restore the throne of David, and with his disciples +to govern a liberated people. But in no degree did he rest his hopes on +the sword of his adherents, but on the legions of angels which the +Father would send him. He was not disconcerted when his end approached +without the kingdom having come. It would come with his return." But how +when he returned was the throne of David to be restored, and a proper, +literal reign to exist, and not a mere spiritual reign? This king has no +business to perform: his work is all accomplished immediately by a +stupendous miracle. And he and his apostles have nothing to do but to +sit on idle thrones, or to feast at tables loaded with luxuries which +are at the same time mundane and supermundane; to enjoy a sensual +paradise, which differs from a Mohammedan paradise only in that it does +not consist of the coarsest forms of sensual life. They are to partake +of an actual wine, a fruit of the vine,--a new kind of wine; to observe +the passover with supermundane food, but food pleasurable to the taste. +This Jesus is thought to have expected and promised.[39] I sometimes +think this attempt to find a half-way doctrine of Jesus' expectation +concerning the future ascribes to him an apocalypticism more inept and +fatuous than that of the Jews themselves. It attempts to unite the +contradictory. It cannot be stated by Strauss in any thing like the +literal sense of the passages on which it is founded, without supposing +something of that political element which it is designed to exclude; or +else entirely dropping that relation to Jewish hopes to which it is +believed to owe its origin, and thus leaving it unexplained. For, if +Jesus gave up all expectation whatever of a kingdom of this world, we +have no occasion for a visible return. + +[Footnote 39: See Renan's Life of Jesus, first edition.] + +II. The second objection to this view is that it is incompatible with +the most important expressions and opinions of Jesus. + +1. The kingdom is to come with the world-catastrophe; and the King is +then to come in some mysterious manner on the clouds of heaven. How, +then, could Jesus say the kingdom of God cometh not with _observation_? +Could any political kingdom arise in a more outwardly striking manner? +How does that saying of Christ comport with his promising a literal +miraculous light in the heaven (Matt. xxiv. 30) which shall betoken his +own coming and the great world-change? That form of coming with a +precursive sign in the heaven is just what he contradicted. Such a +kingdom would come with a sign which could be watched for,--a sign very +different from those signs of the time, the moral indications, which a +spiritual insight might discern. How could he say the kingdom of God was +among them _already_, if it were yet to come at the time of the great +world-change? How could he say to Caiaphas: "Yes, I am the Messiah; and +moreover _from this moment_ you shall see the Son of Man sitting on the +right hand of power and coming on the clouds of heaven"? It was +equivalent to saying, "You have arrested me, you have already doomed me +to death. But I am the Anointed of God to introduce the new spiritual +kingdom of Humanity; and, from this moment in which you decree my death, +my cause takes a Divine impulse, and my purpose strides on to the +triumph God has destined for it." + +2. This expectation is incompatible with what he says on other topics +related to the kingdom, the resurrection, and the future life. This +expectation implies the Apocalyptic view of the resurrection. The +Messiah was to come to raise the dead. (The Christian world has +generally entertained the same view.) The visible return and the +resurrection coexisted, probably, in Jesus' mind. If he held the one, he +held the other. The two opinions were Siamese twins, connected by a +vital bond; separate them and you would kill them both. But Jesus gave a +view of the resurrection and the future life totally different from the +Apocalyptic one. He taught the _continuance_ of life. His argument with +the Sadducees proves that doctrine, or it amounts to nothing. God is the +God not of the dead, but of the living. The Rich Man and Lazarus, of the +parable, are already in a future state of retribution. He who believes +on him has "already passed from death unto life." Jesus could not +suppose that one who had received from him the quickening of spiritual +life could pass into the under-world, and grope as a shade in the +intermediate state. "Whosoever liveth and believeth in him shall never +die." Now, to one who is satisfied that Jesus was emancipated from the +doctrine of an intermediate state, it must be evident that he could not +have held the Apocalyptic notion resting on it of a raising of the dead +at the coming of the Messiah, and could not have held to the visible +coming of the Messiah who was to come to do that very thing. + +The same observation is to be made of the judgment. Jesus shows himself +emancipated from the common notion of the judgment, and of a future +simultaneous judgment-day. He that believeth on him is not judged. He +that believeth not is judged already, in that he has not believed in the +only-begotten Son of God. God sent him not to judge or to punish the +world, but to save it. The judgment of the world is not to be +exclusively at a remote day. It has begun. It is _now_. Christ says, Now +is the judgment of this world; now is the Prince of this world to be +cast out; now, when Jesus is about to consummate by dying the moral +means of that result. Jesus is not to be a personal Judge of men at a +remote time. His principles are for ever to judge men, to judge them +finally. Not himself as the personal Logos, or as the reappearing +Messiah, is to judge men, but "the word he has spoken." These thoughts +in the fourth Gospel must have come from Jesus, not from the writer, who +shows himself in places not emancipated from the view of his time. + +3. The doctrine of Christ's expectation which I am considering is not +congruous with the means which he contemplates for accomplishing his +work, and with the view he took of the progress of his kingdom, and of +the moral duties and retributions of Humanity. Nothing is clearer than +that his kingdom of God was to be a communion of men on earth bound +together by the same consciousness of the heavenly Father. It was to +extend into another life. But it was to spread more and more widely, and +subdue the world to his spiritual dominion. By moral influence he is to +be King. This communion is to be the salt of the earth, the light of the +world. It is to extend its influence by holy example, by good works. He +will be in spirit with the apostles and with his church. He trains them +to carry on his work, and tells them to preach the good news to all +nations. He does this as if founding a work which shall go on +indefinitely. He declares early, in a discourse designed to explain his +kingdom, that the law shall not pass away; that it shall in its moral +requirements be all realized. Heaven and earth shall not pass away until +all shall _be_. And he directs his disciples to pray as much as for +daily bread that God's kingdom may come, and that God's will may be done +_on earth_ as it is done in heaven. Is it possible that this teacher +expects all this to be closed in thirty or forty years, by a violent +catastrophe, and by the substituting of a universal miracle for this +moral instrumentality? He says it is not the Father's will that one of +the lowliest shall perish. Did he mean to limit the opportunity of +salvation for the race to forty years, and to consign to the torment of +Gehenna all who did not accept the new truth in that time? And all this +impossibility is heightened by the nature of some of those parables in +which he treated of his kingdom. "If the kingdom of God were to be +established by an irresistible miracle, on a fixed day, in a manner so +splendid, what signify those admirable parables of the mustard-seed, of +the leaven, of the net, of the grain growing from itself, which suppose +a development, slow, regular, organic, proceeding from an imperceptible +point, but endowed with a Divine vitality, and displaying successively +its latent energies?"[40] Besides, no one ever more strictly enjoined +the duties of life, the everlasting obligations. He contemplates such +duties as are to be done in such a world as ours was then and is now, as +the essential sphere in which the heavenly spirit must be formed in man. +His principle of final judgment is, "Inasmuch as ye have done the duties +of Humanity unto your fellow-men, ye have done them unto me. Come, ye +blessed of my Father." Could that teacher suppose that the opportunity +for performing such duties would cease for ever before the last of his +apostles should have died? Could he think that within that time the +destinies of Humanity as he knew it would be closed? + +[Footnote 40: Réville, Review of Renan's Life of Jesus.] + +These are the principal reasons which determine me to believe that Jesus +did not expect to return visibly to raise the dead, judge the world, and +be the head of an external Theocratic kingdom on the renewed earth. +What, then, shall be said of the language which appears to express that +opinion? "Ye shall drink the wine new with me in my Father's kingdom." +"Ye shall sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel," &c. Two +considerations are to be kept in sight in establishing the views and +expectations of Jesus: first, that he used this language--so far as he +used it--in a figurative sense, to represent spiritual and providential +facts as he conceived them; second, that the evangelists may have +sometimes given to his language a precision and a connection which did +not belong to it, as delivered. That he could not have employed this +language as it is reported to us, in its literal and proper sense, is to +my mind a necessary conviction in the premises. This would suppose that +he entertained two orders of conceptions, which were opposed to one +another, with a clear profound conviction, and gave them as revelations +of God: one his spiritual and rational beliefs; the other his +Apocalyptic beliefs. This supposition is the vice of Renan's seventeenth +chapter. The language of the Apocalyptic beliefs Jesus might use to some +extent as a vehicle for conveying the spiritual and rational to others; +and the most explicit language in which he conveyed his spiritual +beliefs, so far as it was retained in their feebler minds, might be +forced into harmony with their traditional opinions. But that in Jesus' +mind, so original, so manifestly filled with fresh thought on every +theme of Providence and man, these spiritual apprehensions of a kingdom +or communion of God which should act under and within the state, +renovating human life and society; of a Messiah who by such a kingdom +should fulfil the missionary function of Israel to the race of man; of a +resurrection which should be the uninterrupted continuance of the +blessed life, or an immediate renewal of the sense of wasted opportunity +and law violated on earth; of a judgment both immediate and continual of +every soul despising the truth revealed to it; of a retribution to civil +societies according to Divine law,--should arise as original +conceptions, be held with firm decisive grasp, be of the essence of his +instruction, and so pronounced in him that our most advanced modern +thought is but the distant echo of his profound and distinct +enunciations; and that at the same time he should hold those Apocalyptic +traditions, of a visible coming, of a Theocratic throne before whose +splendor that of Cæsar would fade away, of a simultaneous resurrection +and judgment,--hold them in unimpaired conviction, as truths to be +solemnly insisted upon as a part of his revelation,--this, it seems to +me, comes as near a psychological contradiction as we can well conceive. +And besides, if Jesus had clung to those beliefs as Divine convictions, +the language ascribed to him would have had the unity of that of the +Epistles and the Apocalypse on this subject. We should not be perplexed +with apparent contradictions. As it is, we are obliged to use those +words which inculcate his spiritual thought for explaining that part of +his language which is conformed to Jewish conceptions. + +But, it is said, this language would naturally create misunderstanding, +and that it is too bold to be taken in a figurative sense. In regard to +the misunderstanding of it, let it be said, if we suppose a mind +inspired by God to see far deeper and further than its contemporaries, +it must be liable to be misunderstood in proportion to the poverty of +the vernacular language. Jesus' inspiration and insight gave his speech +a character such as the highest poetic endowment always gives, and made +it bold. It is not to be forgotten that he belonged to the east and to +the people who have given us the Old Testament prophecies. The boldest +tropes were natural to him. In moments of strong moral excitement, they +fly from him as sparks from the flint or lightning from the charged +cloud. It exposes him to the charge of mysticism. We forget that he was +not a lecturer, a systematic teacher; but a prophet, a converser in the +streets, a popular teacher, a poet sent from God to re-create humanity. +Necessity concurred with inspiration to make his speech tropical and +often liable to be misapprehended. He was obliged to use images and +terms which the people and the schools applied to the Messiah in order +to claim, as he meant to claim, a predetermined, providential connection +with Hebrew history and hope. When he said to Pilate, "I am a king," it +was a truth; but it was a trope. "I am the bread of life,"--a truth, but +a trope. "I am come to send a sword on the earth, not peace;" "This cup +of wine is my blood sealing the new covenant,"--truths, but compact with +the boldest tropes. When he said, "I am the Messiah," it was a truth, +but a trope. It was liable to be misunderstood; but, without it, it was +impossible that he should be understood. He saw Satan, after the seventy +returned from their mission and related their success, "falling like +lightning from heaven." If he foresaw political revolutions which would +occur within a generation, and believed they would be employed by +Providence to further the establishment of his principles or kingdom, +which would then reach a point from which it would be evident, to a +sympathizing mind quick to catch the glimpses of a new day, that they +would become dominant in humanity, would it be too bold a figure for him +to say, "The coming of the Son of Man will be as the lightning which +shoots from horizon to horizon," or too bold a figure to describe those +precursive overturns and downfalls of the old in language borrowed from +Isaiah and Joel, the prophets whom he loved and knew by heart? Might he +not believe, identifying his religion and the Divine spirit which would +spread it, that at the time of these changes, conspiring providentially +with the labors of apostles and evangelists, his voice would call the +chosen, those prepared by mental and moral affinity, to the new +life-work, to the new order of things; that his call to his own would be +like the supposed call of the last trumpet summoning them to come into a +spiritual communion of blessed work, and blessed hope? These figures +were naturally, almost inevitably, formed in these circumstances. + +He used the language given him in the speech of his time in a figurative +sense, partly because of the want of proper terms suited to his purpose, +and partly because as a popular teacher, desirous to impress the common +mind, he could not sacrifice all the associations connected with that. +But we often find in proximity with it words of his own, or something in +the occasion, which he might expect to constrain the listeners to +reflect that he was speaking figuratively; as John vi., "My words, they +are spirit and they are life," and the reply Luke xxii. 38, to the +information, here are two swords, "It is enough." Were the accounts more +full, it is fair to suppose we might have more such expressions. They +would not be so likely to be remembered as the striking, figurative +words. + +There are words of Christ at the Last Supper which seem to me to have +occasioned quite unnecessary perplexity. "I say unto you I will not +henceforth drink of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it +new with you in my Father's kingdom." They were the spontaneous outflow +of mingled sadness, affection, and hope. He might expect them to be +interpreted to his disciples by his situation, by all he had said of +leaving them, and by his habit of conveying spiritual thought under the +sensuous images suggested by the moment. They referred to the kingdom he +died to establish. They were as natural as to say, "Where two or three +are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." But +they have been a stumbling-block to students whom we should have +expected to be able better to _orient_ themselves in the Master's genius +and style. + +Colani has spent a page to ridicule it, and show that it is not fit for +its place.[41] Yet a similar figure is used by occidental preachers, who +would not expect to be reproached for coarseness. A young minister +on an occasion not unlike that on which Jesus sat with his +disciples--occurring as did that passover in the midst of sacrifice and +revolution, the Thanksgiving day celebrated after the close of our great +war, in our land at once so afflicted and so blessed--addressed his +hearers, some of whom had lost sons or brothers in camp or field, in +figurative but very appropriate and touching language, in which we may +suppose he felt the inspiration of his Master's words at the last meal. +It was to the effect that, although those who had fallen in the strife +could no more partake with us in the bounty with which the Thanksgiving +table would be spread, they would in all future festivals be with us in +spirit, and rejoice in the blessings ever more and more to be realized +which had been purchased by their sacrifices for our disinthralled +country. + +[Footnote 41: Jesus Christ and the Messianic Beliefs of his Time.] + +Nor do I see any better cause of the offence which is taken at the +language ascribed to Jesus in Matt. xix. 28, in the offer of thrones: +"In the regeneration, when the Son of Man shall sit on the throne of his +glory, ye also shall sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of +Israel." Let us think how Jesus must have longed to communicate his +thought and his hope to those chosen ones; how he would not be willing +to drive them away by his very greatness as he sometimes drove away the +careless and cavilling; how his mind, if he were a human being and not +an automaton, would alternate between the sternest truth-speaking and +the necessity of coming closer to them, and giving them hope, and +lifting them a little nearer to himself; how like the mother bird, +enticing her brood to their first flight, and finding he had at one +moment gone beyond them, he would come back, and alight on a point +nearer to their apprehension, that he might tempt them to use the +untried pinions of their thought,--and we need have no difficulty in +seeing that he meant thrones of moral power. I do not know how those men +received it; but I do not believe they thought then of political power. +If, after Jesus left them, they recalled this and every other such +expression as a means of nourishing the hope of an Apocalyptic return +and kingdom, the great Teacher and Comforter was not accountable for +that perversion. + +Jesus' language, then, can be explained without supposing him to have +expected visibly to return after death to erect a kingdom of God of +which he should be the visible head. + +The result of our inquiries is, that Jesus did not aim at any political +sovereignty, that he rose by the force of the special endowment of his +nature above the Apocalyptic superstition of his age, and that he looked +and labored immediately for the moral and spiritual renovation of +humanity on this earth. He claimed to be a Messiah; not a Messiah after +the Jewish conceptions, but a man anointed and endowed of God, to +perfect by the manifestation of the Divine in the human, the means of +this moral renovation of humanity. He regarded the spiritual Messiahship +as a divinely appointed means to this end. He aspired to spiritual rule +for no end but this, and his aspiration was disinterested, godlike. It +has been said that he was ambitious, though it is allowed that his +ambition was the most elevated. And he has been compared with +disadvantage to Socrates, whose ambition, it is said, was "_to serve +without reigning_," while that of Jesus was "_to reign by serving_," and +the former is justly thought to be the nobler purpose. It is no time to +institute a comparison between Jesus and Socrates. I have no wish to +disparage the great Pagan. I will allow Grote's estimate, that the +Apology as given by Plato is the speech of one who deliberately foregoes +the immediate purpose of a defence, the persuasion of his judges; who +speaks for posterity without regard to his own life. The aim of Socrates +was disinterested, but not so elevated as that of Jesus. The aim of +Socrates belonged to the realm of the understanding; the aim of Jesus, +to the realm of the Spirit. They both took delight in the exercise of +their gift: this is innocent, when not an exclusive motive; but Socrates +more consciously sought this delight than Jesus. No self-abnegation can +be conceived more entire than that of the Christ as represented by the +evangelists with every mark of truth. He sought to reign only as all +seek to reign who put forth their powers to assist the development of +other minds. He would reign only so, and so far, as this might be to +serve his race. He had no ambition. His purpose was not _to reign by +serving_, but _to reign that he might serve_. He respected the freedom +of the mind. He appealed to reason and conscience. He claimed authority +in the name of reason and conscience, and believed that he thus claimed +it in the name of God. And if his reign has been more extensive, more +durable, and more beneficent than that of others, it is because he has +acted by the highest kind and with the largest measure of truth and +life, on the highest powers and tendencies of man. + + +Cambridge: Press of John Wilson and Son. + + + Transcriber's Notes: + + Obvious punctuation errors were repaired. + + Phrases in italics are indicated by _italics_. + + Words in the text which were in small-caps were + converted to ALL-CAPS. + + Greek text is transliterated and surrounded by [Greek: ]. + + The "oe" ligature is indicated by "[oe]" (e.g. [oe]cumenical). + + On pg. 77, the Latin phrase for "altar of Heaven" + is transcribed as "Ara C[oe]li" (it might be "Ara Cæli"). + + Typo corrected: + "phenonema" changed to "phenomena" + (pg. 206, "classes of perceived phenomena") + + + + + +End of Project Gutenberg's Christianity and Modern Thought, by Various + +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 41280 *** |
