summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/40362-8.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '40362-8.txt')
-rw-r--r--40362-8.txt5360
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5360 deletions
diff --git a/40362-8.txt b/40362-8.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index e6b1887..0000000
--- a/40362-8.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,5360 +0,0 @@
-Project Gutenberg's Stories of the Universe: Animal Life, by B. Lindsay
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-
-Title: Stories of the Universe: Animal Life
-
-Author: B. Lindsay
-
-Release Date: July 28, 2012 [EBook #40362]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK STORIES OF THE UNIVERSE: ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Robert Baruch, Tom Cosmas and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-[Transcriber's Notes
-
-Emphasis is denotes as _Italic_ and =Bold=. Most small caps text
-has been converted to ALL CAPS; but where some may have been
-rendered as Mixed Case letters where it seemed appropriate.]
-
-
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 1.--THE SCALLOP SHELL, _Pecten Opercularis_ (see
-page 107), SLIGHTLY REDUCED IN SIZE. THE LARGER SHELLS ARE FROM DOUGLAS,
-ISLE OF MAN; THE SMALLER SHELLS ARE YOUNG SPECIMENS FROM LLANDUDNO,
-NORTH WALES.]
-
-
-
-
-STORIES _of the_ UNIVERSE
-
-Animal Life
-
-
-By
-
-
-B. LINDSAY
-
-
-_WITH FORTY-SEVEN ILLUSTRATIONS_
-
-
-NEW YORK
-
-REVIEW _of_ REVIEWS COMPANY
-
-1909
-
-
-
-
-COPYRIGHT, 1902
-
-BY D. APPLETON AND COMPANY
-
-
-_All rights reserved_
-
-
-
-
-PREFACE
-
-
-Of the diagrams which illustrate this little volume, the majority were
-prepared by Miss E. C. Abbott (formerly Bathurst Scholar at Newnham
-College, Cambridge): the sketches were made from specimens in the South
-Kensington Museum of Natural History, which has kindly granted
-permission for their use. In addition to these, there are several
-figures that are taken from specimens in my possession, photographed by
-the publishers; two or three cuts are diagrammatic; and I owe to the
-kindness of Mr. J. Craggs, formerly president of the Northumberland
-Microscopical Association, the drawings of Polycystina and of the scales
-of the Sole.
-
- B. L.
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS
-
-
- CHAPTER PAGE
-
- I. THE STORY OF ANIMAL LIFE 9
-
- II. HOW ANIMALS ADAPT THEMSELVES TO CIRCUMSTANCES 13
-
- III. CLASSIFICATION: THE SORTING OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM 30
-
- IV. THE ONE-CELLED ANIMALS, OR PROTOZOA 45
-
- V. THE COELENTERATA 53
-
- VI. THE SPONGES 63
-
- VII. THE VERMES OR WORMS 68
-
- VIII. THE ARTHROPODA: LOBSTERS, SPIDERS, AND INSECTS 76
-
- IX. THE MOLLUSCA, OR SHELL-FISH 98
-
- X. THE BRACHIOPODA, OR LAMP-SHELLS 117
-
- XI. THE MOSS-CORALS, OR POLYZOA 119
-
- XII. THE ECHINODERMATA 122
-
- XIII. THE CHORDATA 135
-
- XIV. THE VERTEBRATA 138
-
- XV. MAN 167
-
- XVI. HOW ZOOLOGISTS DO THEIR WORK 180
-
- INDEX 193
-
-
-
-
-LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
-
-
- FIGURE PAGE
-
- 1. The Scallop-Shell _Frontispiece_
-
- 2. Limpets and Periwinkles 19
-
- 3. Diagram of _Amoeba_ 35
-
- 4. Section of _Hydra_ 36
-
- 5. Diagrammatic Section of Earthworm 38
-
- 6. Diagram of a Gastrula 41
-
- 7. Diagram of a Trochosphere 42
-
- 8. Shells of Radiolarians (Polycystina) 47
-
- 9. A Coralline 58
-
- 10. Gorgonia 59
-
- 11. Corals 60
-
- 12. Marine Worms 73
-
- 13. A Centipede 77
-
- 14, 15. Shells of Barnacles 79, 80
-
- 16. Hermit Crabs 81
-
- 17. A Land Crab 82
-
- 18. A Sand-hopper 83
-
- 19. A Spider 84
-
- 20. Nest of Trap-door Spider 85
-
- 21. _Galeodes_ 86
-
- 22. A Tick 87
-
- 23. A Scorpion 88
-
- 24. Larvæ of Insects 90
-
- 25. Larva of the Bee 92
-
- 26. Ants 92
-
- 27. White Ants 93
-
- 28. Cocoons of Moths 94
-
- 29. A Moth and its Larva 95
-
- 30. Nest of a Gregarious Caterpillar 96
-
- 31. Development of an English Water-beetle (_Dytiscus_) 96
-
- 32. Insect Pests 97
-
- 33. Branchy Murex 102
-
- 34. Shell of the Common _Venus_ 104
-
- 35. Eggs of Molluscs 115
-
- 36. The Five-holed Sand-Cake 125
-
- 37. A Brittle-Star 129
-
- 38. A Sea-Cucumber 130
-
- 39. A Stone-Lily or Encrinite 131
-
- 40. A Feather-Star 132
-
- 41. Sections showing Position of the Vertebrate Notochord 139
-
- 42. Scales of a Sole 143
-
- 43. Tadpoles 153
-
- 44. Eggs of Reptiles 155
-
- 45. Skull of Kangaroo 162
-
- 46. Skull of Rodent 163
-
- 47. Slide with Rows of Sections for the Microscope 185
-
-
-
-
-THE STORY OF ANIMAL LIFE
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER I
-
-THE STORY OF ANIMAL LIFE
-
-
-If the microscope had never been invented, the Story of Animal Life, as
-it is related by modern science, could never have been told. It is to
-the microscope that we owe our knowledge of innumerable little animals
-that are too small to be seen by the unassisted eye; and it is to the
-microscope that we owe the most important part of our knowledge about
-the bodies of larger animals, about the way in which they are built up,
-and the uses of their different parts. The earlier opticians who toiled,
-one after another, to bring the microscope to perfection, never dreamed,
-in their most ambitious moments, of the value of the gift that their
-labour was to confer upon mankind. For the microscope alone has made it
-possible for men of science to study the world of living things. This is
-the value of honest and thorough work in almost every department of
-intellectual labour; that it builds a firm and sure though perhaps
-hidden foundation for the loftier and more perfect work of after days.
-
-The microscope has shown us the intimate structure of every organ of
-the animal body; and thus, in most cases, the uses of the organ, and
-the steps by which it performs its tasks, have been made clear. The
-microscope has also shown the true nature of the sexual functions, and
-all the steps of the processes of growth in young animals. None of these
-things could ever have been rightly understood without the microscope,
-for all their most important details are invisible to the naked eye.
-To the microscope, too, we owe our knowledge of the essential kinship
-between plants and animals; to it, also, our understanding of the
-oneness, the "solidarity," as the French would say, of the animal
-kingdom, for it is in the structure of microscopic parts that
-resemblances are revealed under the most strikingly different
-circumstances of outward form.
-
-Let us inquire a little into the history of the animals that can only
-be seen by the aid of the microscope. Most of them live in water,
-especially dirty water, containing decaying remains of plants or
-animals. The naturalists who first discovered them studied them in
-"infusions" of hay, and so on, and hence these little creatures were
-named Infusoria--a name that has since been somewhat restricted in its
-application. By an "infusion" is meant that water is poured on some
-substance and allowed to stand; the more ancient and evil-smelling the
-infusion becomes, the more of these little animals do you find living in
-it. Nature provides dirty water ready made, in ditches and in ponds, and
-these are full of microscopic animals. And not only do they appear in
-dirty water, but kindred kinds appear in clean water also, and many in
-the waters of the sea.
-
-It will easily be understood that when the existence of microscopic
-animals was discovered, zoologists had greatly to modify their ideas of
-the animal world. Still more was this the case afterwards, when it was
-found that all animals were built up of minute parts much resembling
-these microscopic animals in their main features. To these unit parts,
-of which all animal bodies are composed, the term "cell" is applied.
-The name of cell is not very descriptive of these units in the animal
-body, but correctly describes the unit of plant structure. In certain
-important essential particulars both, however, are alike. Nowadays we
-are not content to describe the grouping and external features of cells;
-their minute structure also is made a subject of research and inquiry,
-and affords a field for most of the fashionable speculations of our own
-day.
-
-How great has been the progress made by the science of zoology since the
-eighteenth century may be estimated from the following quotation:--
-
-"I remember," says the late George J. Romanes (in his book called "The
-Scientific Evidences of Organic Evolution"), "once reading a very
-comical disquisition in one of Buffon's works on the question as to
-whether or not a crocodile was to be classified as an insect; and the
-instructive feature in the disquisition was this, that although a
-crocodile differs from an insect as regards every conceivable particular
-of its internal anatomy, no allusion at all is made to this fact, while
-the whole discussion is made to turn on the hardness of the external
-casing of a crocodile resembling the hardness of the external casing
-of a beetle; and when at last Buffon decides that, on the whole, a
-crocodile had better not be classified as an insect, the only reason
-given is, that as a crocodile is so very large an animal it would make
-'altogether too terrible an insect.'"
-
-How different is the state of knowledge now, when every part of a
-crocodile or a cockroach is described in print in the minutest detail,
-and set before even the beginner in zoology as a necessary lesson.
-
-But in spite of the labour necessary to master such detailed lessons,
-the study of the animal world is far from prosaic. The Story of Animal
-Life, indeed, bids fair to be the only element of romance left in the
-modern world for those who stay at home in their own land. The traveller
-of days of yore, when he ventured into the woods and fields, or upon
-the water, expected to meet with all sorts of strange things--fairies
-and elves and ugly gnomes; giants, ogres, and dragons; mermaids and
-water-witches. With the spread of education all these things have
-vanished now; it is quite certain that no Board-School-boy has ever met
-any of them: and one's walks abroad would be in these days as prosaic as
-they are safe, but for the world of animal life. If you have eyes for
-this, every field has its inhabitants, and every hedge its marvels.
-Instead of a fairy, you may be well contented to meet a dragon-fly with
-shining wings; instead of an ogre you will find the fierce spider, which
-not only makes away with every harmless fly that blunders into her net,
-but in many cases destroys her own kind also. Many a plant may be met
-with which has its own special caterpillar or other dependent insect,
-with ways of its own, which may amuse your idle hours. As for the change
-of a caterpillar or a tadpole into its adult form, it would be taken for
-a miracle if it were observed for the first time.
-
-The reader may have noticed that there are some unfortunate people who
-have no eyes for these things; from childhood upwards they have been so
-absorbed in money-making or in reading books--the one case is as bad as
-the other--that they have never learnt to observe the facts of nature.
-Some cannot even recognise the different kinds of plants that they see
-in the hedges, or in a country walk. Such natures are intellectually
-defective; they are much to be pitied, and require a special training to
-remedy their stupidity. I mention this, because the occurrence of this
-form of stupidity is one of the dangers resulting from town life and
-bookish education, which we have to guard against at the present time.
-
-But for all healthy people accustomed to the outdoor world, the study of
-animal life has always possessed an interest. Its interest has, however,
-been increased a hundred fold by the progress of modern discovery, which
-has taught us to see in the animal kingdom one large family, working its
-way upwards from humble beginnings, to more perfect structure of body,
-and more complete intelligence of mind.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER II
-
-HOW ANIMALS ADAPT THEMSELVES TO CIRCUMSTANCES
-
-
-We all know what it is to adapt ourselves to circumstances. Suppose two
-lads, fresh from school, go out into the world to earn their living;
-one becomes a navvy and one a clerk. In five years' time these two young
-men will probably be very different in appearance from one another.
-The navvy will have developed his muscles; he will be broad-built,
-broad-chested, and strong. The clerk, on the other hand, will probably
-be comparatively weak and slim, his chest will not be so broad, his
-muscles will not be so well developed. The navvy, too, will probably
-be of a fresh complexion, while the clerk will be pale. All these
-differences are due to the fact that their bodies have adapted
-themselves to circumstances. Both men may be equally healthy, and
-equally long-lived. Let us take another example. Let us compare two
-other youths, of whom one becomes a cobbler and one an Alpine guide.
-The latter, in five years' time will have become a perfect specimen
-of muscular humanity--active, agile, and hardy. The cobbler will be
-comparatively stiff in his limbs and unable to undertake any singular
-feat of muscular exertion, although he may be able to do a very hard
-day's work at his own trade. The mountaineer, too, will probably differ
-in disposition from the cobbler. He will be daring, resourceful, and not
-afraid of danger under circumstances which would terrify the cobbler.
-Now let us suppose that the sons and grandsons of the navvy are brought
-up to be navvies, and the sons and grandsons of the clerk are brought up
-to be clerks;--that the children and grandchildren of the Alpine guide
-follow his own calling, and the children and grandchildren of the
-cobbler do the same;--we shall probably have four families differing
-very much in type of physique from one another. Yet take one of the
-navvy's sturdy grandchildren and bring him up as a clerk, and he will
-lose much of his sturdiness. Let the mountaineer's grandsons be brought
-up as cobblers, and by the time they are thirty they will not be
-remarkable for their muscular capabilities.
-
-Just in a similar way the bodies of animals adapt themselves to
-circumstances. It is not always possible to trace the steps by which
-this has been done. But sometimes it is so; and we may find a whole
-series of varieties that are plainly due to adaptation. When we see an
-animal which is in some way especially fitted for its surroundings, we
-are therefore justified in concluding that it has become so by degrees.
-
-The way in which animals adapt themselves to their surroundings in the
-matter of colour would afford material for several volumes each as large
-as this one. Those who have not travelled in foreign countries may
-perhaps find it difficult to realise that brilliant colouring and showy
-patterns can ever enable an animal to hide itself successfully. But an
-instance may be taken from an animal common on our own shores which will
-illustrate how this principle works.
-
-In the spring there may be found in large numbers upon our rocky coasts
-a little oval shell-fish, about one-third of an inch long, sticking to
-the fronds of the tangle and other broad-leaved seaweeds. The animal is
-of a very pale brown colour; its shell brownish and semi-transparent,
-with several stripes of brilliant turquoise blue down the back. These
-stripes are not continuous, but interrupted at intervals so as to give
-them a beady look. Taken in the hand and looked at closely, the shell,
-with its contrast of blue stripes on a brown ground, is extremely
-conspicuous; brown being, in fact, the contrast-colour which shows blue
-in its greatest brilliancy. Yet, when perched upon the tangle, the
-creature is almost invisible, and might easily be mistaken for a natural
-irregularity of the surface of the seaweed. While the brown is the
-colour of the seaweed itself, the brilliant blue is indeed the exact
-colour of the spring sky at that season, everywhere reflected from the
-sea-water and from the wet surface of the seaweed. By matching that
-brilliant colour the animal therefore is rendered invisible. This
-little creature is the young of the Semi-transparent Limpet, _Patella
-pellucida_. This, at least, was the old-fashioned name for it, though
-it has received others. Its young and its adult form are so different
-in the appearance of the shell, that they have been described under
-different names. English readers who search for it in the spring will
-learn by experience that bright colouring may help to make a creature
-invisible. But this is not all that is to be said about the protective
-colouring of this little shell-fish. There are many creatures whose
-young live at the surface of the sea, and afterwards migrate to deeper
-water as they attain adult age. In early life they are transparent,
-because thus they best escape notice in the clear water of the surface,
-especially when seen from below, by the many enemies on the watch to
-devour them. But in their later life they become opaque, because thus
-they best escape notice from enemies watching from above, as they crawl
-along the bottom of the sea. Now this is the case with the little
-Patella. For this also migrates to the bottom--in this instance a
-comparatively short journey--when it is ready for adult life. Both
-shell and animal, therefore, are at first nearly transparent, but in
-older life both become more opaque; the blue stripes, too, are almost or
-quite obliterated in the after-growth of the shell, slight traces of
-them alone remaining at its apex. This change of colour fits the animal
-for the new home in which it settles, for it moves down from the leaf
-of the tangle to its root, and there finds a snug shelter among
-the coral-shaped branches of which the root is composed. Not many
-reflections of the blue sky are likely to reach the recesses of the
-tangle-root, so the creature has no longer any need of its protective
-colouring of blue.
-
-The adult shell, however, retains a certain degree of translucency,
-which matches very well with the colouring of the tangle-root; and thus
-presents a great contrast to the shell of the common Limpet, which is
-found on rocks. The rugged surface of the latter is usually more or less
-irregularly speckled in harmony with the surfaces on which it lives,
-though this shell also presents when young occasional touches of blue,
-which suggests a family likeness in colour tastes on the part of the two
-kinds of Limpet. The blue in this case, however, is of the dullest and
-dingiest shade. The _Patella pellucida_ is common on the more rocky
-portions of our coasts; in spring the young may be seen in thousands on
-the seaweeds of the Isle of Man; here its habits were first observed and
-described in detail by the Manx naturalist Forbes, who noticed its
-peculiar way of finding a hiding place among the roots of the tangle.
-The same shell-fish, in contrast with the commoner Limpet of the rocks,
-affords another instance of the way in which shells adapt their forms
-to their surroundings. In each case the shell is a plain conical cap,
-and the animal within keeps the shell firmly attached to the base on
-which it rests. The Limpet can move about at a very creditable snail's
-pace when it wishes to do so, and at low-water mark, when the tide is
-beginning to rise, you may easily find them moving about and off their
-guard; but during many hours of the day, when the tide is out, the main
-object of the Limpet is to keep its shell as firmly fixed to the rock as
-possible. It will at once be seen that if the margin of the shell were
-smooth like that of a tea-cup, and the surface of the rock to which it
-clung very irregular, many chinks would be left between the margin of
-the shell and the surface of the rock through which unwelcome visitors
-might find entrance. The loss of moisture through the crevices, too,
-would be a serious thing to the animal during the hours when the shell
-is uncovered by the tide and exposed to the rays of a hot sun. On the
-other hand, if the margin of the shell were irregular, and the surface
-on which it rested smooth, unprotected crevices would in the same way
-be left. So the Limpets adapt the shape of their shell to their
-surroundings; the _Patella pellucida_, which lives on the smooth
-branches of the tangle-root, has a shell with a smooth regular edge;
-while the _Patella vulgata_, which lives upon rocks, has a shell with an
-irregular, indented edge, whose irregularities fit into those of the
-rock on which it rests. (See Fig. 2.)
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 2.--Shells mentioned in Chap. II. 1, Common Limpet,
-old and young; 2, Semi-transparent Limpet, old and young (the remains
-of the young shell may be seen crowning the adult shell); 3, Common
-Yellow Periwinkle; 4, Common Edible Periwinkle; and 5, High-tide-mark
-Periwinkle, both with a sharp spire, for comparison. One specimen of
-the latter stands among group 3.]
-
-Probably every reader will be able to appreciate the above instances of
-creatures adapted to their surroundings. For there are few people who
-are not familiar with the common Limpet of the shore between tide-marks,
-and with the great seaweed called Tangle, which has its habitat a little
-lower down, and forms great sea-meadows, whose upper limits alone are
-ever laid bare by the tide. The _Patella pellucida_, too, is fairly
-common, and the dead shell may be found on most rocky parts of our coast
-all the year round. As for the blue-striped young shell, floating on the
-blades of the tangle, those who have leisure to visit the seaside during
-the months of spring and early summer, may have seen it as I have
-described it; and the mention of it will recall pleasant memories of
-clear spring skies, and fresh sea-winds, and fields of heavy tangle
-swaying gently on the swell that comes in from the open sea. It is
-interesting to know something of the habits of the creatures whose forms
-we study, and we have already spoken of the snug little hiding-place
-that the Semi-transparent Limpet finds for itself in the tangle-root.
-It is of interest to remember that the Common Limpet, too, is a
-home-loving creature, which knows and prefers the spot of rock on which
-it habitually rests; and can find its way back to it, aided by its two
-eyes and two smelling patches. This has been proved by Professor Lloyd
-Morgan, who has recorded the result of his observations, made on the
-coast of Dorsetshire. It is not easy to detach a Limpet from the rock
-without injuring or exhausting it, but these specimens were caught when
-moving of their own accord, and were therefore uninjured and brisk. They
-were removed to short distances, and the following table shows the
-result of the experiment, clearly proving that the Limpet prefers home,
-but regards a distance of two feet as a very long journey.
-
- ----------+-------------+----------+---------+--------
- | | Number | |
- Number | Distance in | Returned | In Four | Later.
- Removed. | Inches. | in Two | Tides. |
- | | Tides. | |
- ----------+-------------+----------+---------+--------
- 25 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 0
- 21 | 12 | 13 | 5 | 0
- 21 | 18 | 10 | 6 | 2
- 36 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 3
- ----------+-------------+----------+---------+--------
-
-Similar observations were made at an earlier date, by Mr. George
-Roberts, at Lyme Regis.
-
-Let us now take an instance of adaptation in form. And this time we will
-take a shell so common that everybody will know it.
-
-Everyone who has spent a little time in naturalising on the shore, has
-noticed how often you may find univalve shells, such as those of the
-whelk and periwinkle, with the top of the shell knocked off. This is
-nearly always the case with the dead shells that you find strewn along
-the tide-line; and after a storm, on a rocky coast, you may find shells
-that still contain the living tenant, in the same sad condition. And you
-may also meet not infrequently with shells, dead or living, that bear
-evidence of the owners' efforts to repair them after an accident to the
-spire. A piece has been broken, and you find it cemented on again by a
-patch of shell, serviceable no doubt to the owner, but crooked and
-unsightly in appearance. Now there is a very common shell, the little
-yellow periwinkle, which has practically done away with its spire, the
-coils of the shell being so curved that the earlier part of the spire
-does not project beyond the later-formed coils, and the whole shell has
-a rounded outline. This little creature lives on the long seaweeds which
-grow at low-water mark or near it; and when the sea is rough it is
-obviously liable to be dashed from its foothold on the seaweed and flung
-violently down, as the huge seaweeds sway about in the shallow waves. We
-may easily satisfy ourselves that this is an accident that frequently
-happens, by examining the shore when the tide is going out, on some
-stormy spring or autumn day. Numbers of the yellow periwinkles are then
-to be found crawling on the sand, and striving to regain their place in
-the seaweedy rocks as soon as possible. On a calm day you will rarely
-see one crawling on sand above low-water mark, for it is a place they do
-not choose by preference; those that are to be found there on the stormy
-day have lost their foothold, and have been washed about by the tide.
-Had they, like some other kinds of periwinkle, a sharp spire, how many
-would be the casualties under these circumstances! But as it is, you do
-not see a single specimen with a broken top: the rounded spire is an
-adaptation to circumstances, required for the protection of the tenant
-of the shell. (See Fig. 2.)
-
-It may be added that the yellow Periwinkle is not only protected from
-mechanical sources of danger by its form, but is also in some degree
-protected from living enemies by its colour. This, at first sight, seems
-exceedingly conspicuous. We must remember, however, that the animal
-often lives in that part of the shore where the Bladder Seaweeds, or
-Fuci, are extremely abundant. The flowering ends of these are of a
-yellow colour, fairly bright. When seen from below, with the sunlight
-streaming through them, they no doubt appear much brighter than when
-seen, as we see them, from above, with the sunlight falling on them.
-Now protection from foes below is what the yellow periwinkle needs
-most: for fishes are quite ready to swallow it whole, and are not in
-any way deterred by the thickness of the shell, which is (by-the-way)
-in a measure a protection against birds when the tide is out; fishes
-habitually swallow shell-fish whole, although the inmate only is
-digested. The bright yellow, then, that seems to us so conspicuous, is
-probably a good means of hiding for the periwinkle when under water. Its
-common variations in colour, too, are probably protective in their use:
-some are a dull purplish brown, some drab. These are good colours in
-which to lie hidden, respectively, under darker tracts of seaweed, or
-upon the rock itself. This little shell is so abundant on rocky coasts
-that on some beaches the dead shells are as numerous as pebbles. No
-wonder, with all these adaptations for protection!
-
-Another instance of adaptation to circumstances is described in the
-sea-urchin shown on p. 125. This is one among many instances where
-animals that live on sand or mud acquire a flattened shape, so that
-their weight is distributed, and the danger lessened, of their sinking
-in a quick-sand. The flat-fish, such as soles and flounders, are a
-familiar example; and the same principle is illustrated by the flattened
-forms of many of the bivalve shell-fish, whose flat shell, when closed,
-can lie safely on the loosest sand. Equally is their form adapted for
-their circumstances, when, in their slow way, they begin to move. For
-the flat valves of the shell are placed to the right and left of the
-animal's body. So that when it stirs, or floats quietly in the current
-of the tide, the shells present their sharp edges to the resistance of
-the water, thus enabling the creature to move like a ship through the
-sea, or like a knife-blade through bread, with the least possible
-friction: and specially is this provision for the lessening of friction
-important, when we consider that many of these bivalve shell-fish have
-to move, not only through water, but also through sand and mud.
-
-It may be assumed that every reader is familiar with the common forms of
-the bivalve shell-fish. The frontispiece shows one of them, considerably
-flattened in shape.
-
-So far, however, we have not explained _how_ animals adapt themselves to
-circumstances; we have only pointed out the fact that they do so.
-
-Take the case of our little Limpet. It cannot say: "I will paint myself
-with blue and brown, so as to be mistaken for a bit of seaweed
-reflecting the blue sky"; nor can the periwinkle say: "I will paint
-myself with yellow, so as to pass unnoticed among the yellow ends of the
-_Fucus_; and I will build my spire low, so that it will not be broken."
-The bivalve shell-fish and the Sand-Cake sea-urchins do not say to one
-another, "Let us alter our shells, and build them a little flatter, so
-that we shall not sink in too deep when we lie upon the ooze and sand of
-the sea."
-
-How then do these adaptations take place? Darwin has explained this for
-us. Individuals often have some little peculiarity, in which they differ
-from the average of their kind. The establishment of such little marks
-of individuality is spoken of as Variation. If among these individual
-peculiarities there is one which is in any way disadvantageous, _e.g._
-one which tends to make the creature conspicuous in the sight of its
-foes, the owner will be quickly eaten, and of that peculiarity there
-will be an end. If, on the contrary, the peculiarity gives the owner
-some advantage over its fellows, that individual will survive, and
-probably transmit its peculiarity to some of its descendants.
-
-We have seen, for instance, that it is of advantage to our little
-periwinkle to be yellow, when it lives in certain situations; and that
-it sometimes presents other colours, likely to be favourable in other
-cases. If we gather together a large number of specimens, we shall find
-a surprising range of variation in colour. Some present a tint of bright
-orange, nearly red; some are a dull brown; the dark purple shade and the
-drab have been already referred to. The very young shell usually
-presents an unmistakable shade of pink; and we may find innumerable
-half-grown specimens in which we may trace the gradual establishment of
-the advantageous yellow colour, from an original shade of unmistakable
-pink, presented by the earlier whorls. Kindred varieties of the shell,
-too, may be found with stripes or speckles. Since this very common shell
-may be found in abundance on any rocky shore in the British Isles, the
-reader may easily study its colour-variations, both in the dead and the
-living shell. Study also the ground on which the creature lives, with
-its sharp colour-contrasts of rock and seaweed patches, and it will be
-easy to understand why the colours are thus varied, with a
-preponderance, on the whole, of the yellow shades. It is all a question
-of the survival of the fittest--the unfit being represented by colours
-too easily seen, and therefore quickly snapped up. As for the spire, it
-has already been shown how that is adapted to circumstances. It is
-worthy of remark that in the kindred Edible Periwinkle, _Littorina
-littorea_, which has a sharp spire, elderly specimens may be seen with
-the end of the spire damaged.
-
-Turn again for a moment to our first instance--the adaptation of men to
-a sedentary or an outdoor occupation. Here we dwelt upon the change
-produced by their mode of life; we left out of sight the "survival of
-the fittest." Yet here it is equally surely at work. How often does the
-young mountaineer, less agile than his fellows, come by a violent death?
-Only those who are equal to the necessities of the life survive--many
-are lost. How often does the clerk, tied to his desk, fail in health
-and die? How often, hating a sedentary life for which he is unfitted,
-does he throw his energies into athletics, lose interest in his office
-work, and get dismissed? Here again comes in "the survival of the
-fittest"--for a desk: alas! perhaps the only means of livelihood.
-
-But _why_ do variations occur? This is the question first asked by a
-child, when you try to explain the working of "natural selection." It is
-also the last question asked by scientists, who are still industriously
-engaged upon studying the problem.
-
-In the above instances from human life, we have considered the
-occurrence of changes brought about in the organism by the circumstances
-of life; or as scientists say, by the "environment." Scientific men are
-busily hunting for instances of variation of this sort. Take for
-example, an animal which lives sometimes in salt water, sometimes in
-water that is only brackish; there are cases in which small differences
-can be noticed, according to the difference in the habitat. Notice the
-marine shell-fish, for instance, near the estuary of a river: they are
-often less robust specimens than are found at a point free from the
-influence of fresh water.
-
-Not until the effect of known causes on the rise of variations has
-been studied much more fully than at present, will it be possible to
-judge regarding the nature of those variations which _appear_ to be
-spontaneous; for which, at present, no predisposing cause can be
-assigned.
-
-A very large number of variations, however, fall into the class of
-"Atavistic" variations; that is to say, those which show a return to an
-ancestral type. These are variations which are very rarely welcome. If,
-for instance, a boy has a pair of handsome black rabbits, he is not much
-pleased to find among their progeny, every now and then, one of the
-colour of the original wild Bunny. The probability, in this case, is
-that the atavistic variety will find its way into a pie, instead of
-being kept as a pet. Equally unsatisfactory to the owner, is the
-incorrigibly savage and intractable dog or horse--a reversion to the
-mental type of an ancestor which knew not the authority of a master.
-
-Atavistic variation often occurs when members of two well-marked
-varieties are mated; so that in some of the offspring produced, each
-parent seems to cancel out the more extreme characteristics of the
-other, leaving only the characteristics of the more generalized
-ancestral type, from which both parents have alike been derived.
-
-When the ancestral type is in some way inferior to the modern one,
-variation which consists in reverting to the former is often referred to
-as Degeneracy. There is reason to believe that discomfort and hardship
-of existence tend to produce variation of this kind--a fact of supreme
-importance, when the problem of Degeneracy is considered in connection
-with human life. When creatures begin to degenerate, it is, in fact, as
-if the species were saying to itself, "I have gone astray; let me
-retrace my steps along the road by which I came, and maybe I shall find
-comfort and safety; step by step I will try to go back to my ancestral
-form."
-
-Very rapid variation of any sort is indeed often a sign that the
-struggle for existence is too hard for the type in question. The
-palæontologist can tell us of types that present numerous variations
-before becoming extinct; while others, comfortably holding their own in
-the struggle for existence, remain practically unchanged during age
-after age of the geological record, and survive even up to the present
-day. We may borrow from commercial life a homely illustration that will
-explain this aspect of variation. When competition in trade is keen, the
-seller must have novelties; he will try all sorts, and find some good,
-some bad, some indifferent. If he now revives an out-of-date pattern of
-goods, for the sole sake of change, this is Degeneracy. But where, on
-the contrary, competition is dull, the same firm will turn out the
-same goods for a long period of time. There is an optimum in trade
-competition: a reasonable competition results in the production of
-sensible novelties, and consequent progress; but competition over-keen
-results in the production of rubbish, leading to eventual failure. So in
-the world of animal life; a certain degree of struggle for existence
-results in variation, establishment of new varieties, progress. A
-greater degree results in too rapid variation, new varieties that
-speedily perish, and finally, the extinction of the type.
-
-We have spoken of "varieties." Each of the domestic animals presents
-varieties, which are the cumulative result of the breeder's artificial
-selection of natural variations. Thus the Pug and the Collie for
-instance, are varieties of the Dog; the Bantam and the Dorking of the
-Fowl. Among wild animals, varieties are similarly produced by _natural_
-selection, resulting from the "survival of the fittest." By degrees,
-intermediate forms are lost; and new species are established by the
-greater and greater divergence of varieties originally derived from one
-ancestral type.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE POSITION IN CLASSIFICATION OF THE ANIMALS NAMED IN THE
-FOREGOING CHAPTER
-
- =Phylum= =MOLLUSCA=, or Shell-fish.
-
- =Class= GASTEROPODA, or Snail-like Shell-fish.
-
- =Sub-Class= ANISOPLEURA, or Unequal-sided Gasteropods.
-
- =Branch= STREPTONEURA, or Unequal-sided Gasteropods with nerves
- twisted into the shape of a figure of 8.
-
- /------------^-----------\ /--------------^--------------\
- =Order= ZYGOBRANCHIATA, AZYGOBRANCHIATA,
- or Streptoneura with or Streptoneura with
- a pair of gills. only one gill.
-
- =Genus= _Patella_, the Limpet, _Littorina_, the Periwinkle,
- with gills obliterated, or Shore Shell.
- and only indirectly
- represented; breathing
- is performed by folds
- of the mantle.
-
- =Species= _Vulgata_, the Common _Littoralis_, the (Yellow)
- Limpet. Periwinkle that lives
- above low-tide-mark.
-
-
-
-CHAPTER III
-
-CLASSIFICATION, OR THE SORTING OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM
-
-
-Give a child a few handfuls of shells. Probably the first thing he will
-do with them is to sort out the various kinds and separate them from
-one another. Each will go into a little heap by itself; and next, our
-young friend will find names for them. These are Cap-shells and those
-Sword-shells; these Saucers and those Plates; these Yellow-shells and
-those Pink-shells--according as some special character or form or colour
-strikes his fancy.
-
-Now this is what zoologists have been doing with the animal kingdom
-from the earliest days of science; trying to recognise each distinct
-kind of animal form, and to give it a name of its own. Unfortunately for
-the reader, zoologists have been obliged to choose names of Latin and
-Greek origin, and therefore in writing about animals we are often
-obliged to burden our pages with long words. This is a disadvantage, but
-it is a very slight one compared with the great advantage gained by
-using the learned tongues, which consists in this, that learned men from
-all countries of the globe can equally understand the names thus brought
-into use. One particular kind of creature may have one name in English,
-another in French, another in German, and so on; but the learned world
-does not trouble itself with this multiplicity of names--it gives the
-creature a couple of names in Latin, and these names stand good for
-learned readers in every part of the globe. The importance of this will
-be fully realised when, in a later page, we shall have to speak of the
-work done by zoologists, and the way in which they do it. Meantime we
-must ask our readers to have patience if now and then some long names
-must be used. These learned names sometimes convey a description of some
-important characteristic possessed by the animal, and sometimes they are
-merely fanciful names, such as the child we have spoken of gives to his
-zoological playthings. It does not greatly matter whether the name is
-descriptive or not; zoologists describe each animal kind in its most
-minute details, and the most commonplace or inappropriate name serves
-its purpose quite efficiently as a means of referring to published
-descriptions.
-
-We have spoken of sorting the animal kingdom into its various kinds.
-But how do we know when a number of animals are all of one kind? No two
-individual animals are ever exactly alike, any more than two persons are
-ever exactly alike. "It is a matter of common observation that no two
-individuals of a species are ever exactly alike; two tabby cats,
-for instance, however they may resemble one another in the general
-characters of their colour and markings, invariably present differences
-in detail by which they can be readily distinguished. _Individual
-variations_ of this kind are of universal occurrence" (T. J. Parker).
-
-Among a host of animals that present so many differences, how do we
-determine what shall be considered as belonging to one and the same
-kind? This is a point that nature usually settles thus. If two varieties
-when mated produce offspring which are perfectly fertile when mated
-again with another set of offspring similarly produced, then the two
-varieties, however differing in appearance, belong to one species. If on
-the other hand, the two belong to a different species, the offspring
-will be what is called a mule or hybrid, and will not produce offspring
-if mated with another mule. One of the most familiar examples of a mule
-is the animal, commonly so-called, which results from mating a horse and
-an ass, and partakes of the characteristics of both.
-
-Every animal receives two Latin or Latinised names, the first that of
-the genus, the second that of the species; this system of naming, often
-referred to as the "binary nomenclature," we owe to the industry of
-Linnaeus the great Swedish botanist and zoologist. Genera are groups
-consisting of a number of different species which closely resemble one
-another. Similarly genera, which are somewhat alike, are again formed
-into larger groups, and so on. The names of families, orders, and
-classes used to be given to these groups in ascending order; but it is
-now generally recognised that such names are arbitrary, and that the
-divisions into which animals may naturally be grouped are altogether
-irregular, and not comparable with one another. Those who know a little
-of botany will readily understand, from their knowledge of wild flowers,
-that natural groups cannot be arranged in a formal series.
-
-The main branches of the animal kingdom, the largest groups of all, used
-formerly to be called sub-kingdoms. Now the main divisions are often
-spoken of as phyla or races. Classifications, although they differ much
-in detail, according to the preferences of individual zoologists, yet
-agree as to the main branches of the animal kingdom, the chief of these
-are:--
-
- 1. The Protozoa, or One-celled Animals.
- 2. The Coelenterata or Two-layered Animals.
- 3. The Sponges or Porifera.
- 4. The Vermes or Worms.
- 5. The Arthropods or Jointed Animals, viz., Insects and Crustacea.
- 6. The Mollusca or Shell-fish.
- 7. The Brachiopoda or Lamp-Shells.
- 8. The Bryozoa or Moss-Corals.
- 9. The Echinodermata or Sea-Urchins.
- 10. The Chordata, including--(_a_) the Hemichordata;
- (_b_) the Ascidians; (_c_) the Vertebrata.
-
-Within recent years an attempt has been made to express the relationship
-these groups bear to one another, by placing them in separate divisions
-or grades. The first grade includes only the Protozoa, or unicellular
-animals. The position of second grade has been assigned to the
-Coelenterata or diploblastic animals, whose bodies consist typically of
-two layers of cells. A third grade includes only a few groups of the
-lower worms, among which three body-layers may be distinguished, but no
-body-cavity is present. While the fourth grade, including practically
-the rest of the animal kingdom, have three body-layers (see p. 38), and
-a body-cavity surrounding the internal organs (see p. 38).
-
-This arrangement of groups is an extremely convenient one; all the more
-convenient because it easily admits of modification. Already, indeed, we
-might find room for a grade intermediate between I. and II., consisting
-of what might be termed monoblastic animals, namely, animals consisting
-of a single layer of cells. For the frequent occurrence of Larvæ of this
-kind, consisting of a hollow ball of cells, renders zoologists on the
-alert to find a grown-up organism built in the same way. It is doubtful
-whether any of the forms that have been supposed to answer to this
-description really do so. Certain forms of these often claimed as plants
-by the botanists are, however, in the meanwhile, invited in to fill the
-blank.
-
-There are also animals in which the internal layer of the body is very
-much reduced, consisting sometimes in fact of one cell only. Those are
-the Dicyemidæ and Orthonectidæ, both of them parasitic forms. They
-differ so completely from all other forms that it has been proposed to
-make for them a special group, the Mesozoa, or Midway animals, between
-the Protozoa and all the rest of the animal kingdom. It is, however,
-possible to group them under the head of Diploblastic animals; but
-nothing more different from the Coelenterata could well be imagined, and
-some regard them as a degraded form of worm.
-
-The animals which are higher in structure than the Protozoa, viz. our
-divisions 2 to 10, are often grouped under the name Metazoa. The Metazoa
-thus include Grades II., III., and IV.
-
-The meaning of the division of the animal kingdom into grades will be
-more apparent if we give an example of each.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 3.--_Amoeba_, a typical unicellular animal: _n_,
-nucleus; _cv_, contractile vacuole; _ps_, pseudopodia; highly magnified.
-This represents Grade I. of animal existence.]
-
-GRADE I. _The One-Celled Animals._--_Amoeba_, the Mobile animal, is
-the typical example of these. It consists of a single microscopic cell.
-In this cell is seen a dark irregular speck, the nucleus, which is an
-essential character of cells, whether they are independent or form
-part of the body of a larger animal. There is often visible also a
-clear rounded space, called the "contractile vacuole," which squeezes
-out fluid, disappears, and reappears again, serving the purpose of
-excretion. The cell-substance, called protoplasm, is practically
-identical in this and in cells of all other kinds. It is jelly-like, and
-capable of a slow movement, which may be watched under the microscope.
-It suggests the flowing of treacle or thick gum. The movement may be
-traced by the change in outline of the cell and by the change in
-position of any granules that it may have taken in; for particles which
-touch the creature sink in and are surrounded; thus it obtains its food.
-These slow flowing movements of the protoplasm result in continual
-changes of shape; hence the name, Amoeba, the mobile animal. Sometimes
-the island of protoplasm, as it changes its shape, throws out, as it
-were, capes and headlands. These projections, which are presently drawn
-in again, are called pseudopodia or false feet. They are characteristic
-of the whole group of Amoeba-like animals, which are consequently called
-Rhizopoda, the root-footed. The production of new individuals is
-accomplished by the division of the old cell into two. Thus it may be
-said that there is always a bit of the old cell remaining, though
-divided into fragments; and for this reason the Amoeba-like Protozoans
-have been fancifully called "immortal."
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 4.--Section, highly magnified, of a two-layered
-animal, _Hydra_ (Grade II.). _Ec_, outer layer of Ectoderm; _En_, inner
-layer of Endoderm; _l_, lamella dividing the two, represented by a line;
-_n_, nuclei of the cells; _v_, thin vacuoles of small interstitial
-cells; _E_, the Enteron or digestive cavity.]
-
-GRADE II. _The Two-layered, or Diploblastic Animals._--The type of
-these usually chosen is _Hydra_, a two-layered animal, which is further
-described on p. 54. A section through Hydra (Fig. 4) shows (1) the outer
-or skin layer of cells, called the ectoderm, and (2) the inner or
-stomach layer of cells, called the endoderm (literally outer skin and
-inner skin). The clear recognition of the primary body-layers of the
-simpler invertebrates as identical with the primary body-layers of the
-embryo of higher forms, is largely owing to the teaching of Professor
-Huxley, the importance of whose work on this and in many other respects,
-is little guessed at by many readers who know his name merely as a
-popular exponent of scientific ideas. The two-layered body of Hydra
-encloses a hollow digestive space; from this the Coelenterata receive
-their name, which means "possessing a hollow space only, by way of
-intestines." The name of Acoelomata, animals without a body-cavity, has
-therefore been given to the Coelenterata and sponges. The meaning of the
-term body-cavity will be explained in the next paragraph but one. The
-Hydra, like all animals of its grade, and all those of the succeeding
-grades, reproduces itself by means of ova or egg-cells, and spermatozoa
-which fertilize them.
-
-GRADE III. _The Triploblastic Animals without Body-Cavity._--This is a
-small section including only some of the lowest worms, such as the
-forms called Planarians. Between the Ectoderm and Endoderm lies an
-intermediate layer the Mesoderm. There are the beginnings of this in
-the Coelenterata and Sponges, but here it is further established. It
-includes a very thick layer of muscles.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 5.--Diagrammatic plan of section cut through an
-Earthworm to show the position of the three body-layers and the
-body-cavity (Grade IV.). _Sk_, skin; _al_, glandular lining of the
-alimentary canal; _w_, muscular wall of body; _w'_, muscular of
-intestine, both belonging to the third layer or mesoblast; _b.c._,
-body-cavity (shaded); _al.c._, cavity of alimentary canal (shaded); _n_,
-nerve.]
-
-GRADE IV. _The Coelomata or Triploblastic Animals with a
-Body-Cavity._--This grade includes all the remainder of the animal
-kingdom. As an example of it, we may take the Common Frog. If we open
-from the lower surface the dead body of a frog, we first cut through
-the skin, next the muscles; then we come to the viscera, lying neatly
-packed in a cavity from which we can dislodge them. This cavity is the
-Body-Cavity. The skin corresponds with the ectoderm of Hydra, although
-it is a vastly more complicated affair. The glandular lining of the
-alimentary canal corresponds with the endoderm of Hydra; although this,
-too, is a more complicated affair. The mass of the body, lying between
-these two layers, is considered to correspond somewhat with the mesoderm
-of Grade III., and has received the collective term of Mesoblast. This
-description applies equally to the earthworm, for the higher worms
-differ immensely from the lower worms, and stand on a level with more
-important members of the animal kingdom (see Fig. 41, p. 139). The
-body-cavity may be formed in different ways in different animal groups;
-but there is reason to believe that in certain cases it originates by a
-folding off of part of an original cavity corresponding with that of
-Hydra; so that part went to form the intestine, and part the cavity
-surrounding it.
-
-The above arrangement of the main great groups of animals into four
-grades is that given by Professor Arnold Lang.
-
-It should be added, that there are a few exceptional forms that present
-a departure from these broad rules of structure. They are, however, so
-few that they need only be named as curiosities. For instance, there are
-parasites in which the inner body-layer is practically done away with,
-because they are fitted to absorb food through the outer layer. And in
-one division of the Moss-Corals there is no body-cavity to be seen,
-although it is to be found in the other division.
-
-What is the outcome of all this sorting of the animal kingdom? This most
-important result: that a classification of the animal kingdom into the
-four grades we have named, presents, in serial order, the stages through
-which young animals of the higher forms pass in the course of their
-growth. Every creature begins as a unicellular organism--the fertilised
-egg-cell. A vast number of creatures belonging to the higher groups
-present, later on, a two-layered condition, comparable with that of
-Grade II. Later on they acquire a third layer, and therefore correspond
-with Grade III. By degrees the body-cavity is formed, and they then
-present the adult body-structure of Grade IV. The development of the
-chicken in the egg, for instance, presents these four stages.
-
-It will be sufficiently apparent that this coincidence is too striking
-to be without a meaning. Zoologists are all agreed in their
-interpretation of this meaning: it is, that the history of the
-individual presents a summary of the history of the race, and goes
-through the stages of structure which its ancestors presented in their
-adult forms. The story of the gradual upward struggle of the animal
-kingdom, from its humble beginnings to its present wonderful complexity,
-is written in the growing tissues of every young creature.
-
-The principle that ancestral traits betray themselves is accepted as a
-truism in common life. Do we see young people rude and stupid? We say,
-perhaps, "No wonder; their grandfather was a drunken, worthless lout."
-Do we see a family of the poorest class clever, and industrious, and
-refined? We say, "They come of a good stock." When we speak in this way,
-we reason from the common experience of mankind, that children resemble
-their ancestors. Similarly, when zoologists find an embryo starting its
-existence from one cell, they say, "No wonder; its ancestors were
-unicellular." And when they find it assuming a two-layered form, they
-say, "Its ancestors were two-layered creatures." So certain are
-zoologists of the existence of an ancestral two-layered form, the parent
-at once of the existing Coelenterata and of the higher forms, that
-Professor Hæckel has given it a special name--Gastræa. The two-layered
-young stage of higher creatures, when it has a free-swimming existence,
-is called a Gastrula (Fig. 6). Both names, meaning stomach-animal, refer
-to the structure, which is, in a still simpler form, that of _Hydra_--a
-two-layered bag of cells, of which the inner layer, lining the cavity,
-performs the work of digestion. The lowest of the Vertebrata, the
-Lancelet (see p. 140), has a larva of this kind. The same reasoning
-which suggests the existence of an ancestral Gastræa-animal, suggests
-that of an ancestral Planula-animal; for the two-layered animals, on
-their part, present us with a monoblastic larva of the form already
-described (p. 34), called a Planula. Hence it is that zoologists look
-with such eagerness for forms, of which it can be said that they consist
-of one layer of cells only. The name Planula signifies "wandering
-animal," because the Planula larva swims about by means of cilia.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 6.--Diagrammatic representation of a typical
-Gastrula, or two-layered larval form, highly magnified; optical section,
-longitudinal. _Ec_, Ectoderm or skin layer; _En_, Endoderm or stomach
-layer; _m_, mouth leading into the enteric cavity. The dots are the
-nuclei of the cells.]
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 7.--Diagrammatic representation of a typical
-Trochosphere, or ciliated larva, considerably magnified. _M_ is
-the mouth; the stomach and intestine are seen showing through the
-transparent body.]
-
-Mention has been made above of larval forms. It is perhaps advisable to
-explain clearly what is meant by this term. It is a matter of every-day
-knowledge that in some animals the young form presents an appearance and
-structure very different from that of the grown-up form, and adapted for
-a different mode of life; the commonest instances are the caterpillar of
-the butterfly and the tadpole of the frog. We are apt to think of these
-creatures as somewhat exceptional in this respect. But the zoologist, in
-viewing the whole range of the animal kingdom, finds a vast number of
-animals with larvæ, differing much from the adult, and adapted for a
-different mode of life. It is, in fact, a very common arrangement; but
-often these larvæ are very minute, perhaps absolutely microscopic,
-therefore only known to the scientific observer. The two familiar
-instances we have named are fortunately big enough to be known to
-everyone. Now it is an axiom with modern zoologists (as has been
-explained above), that the history of the individual is a summary of the
-history of its ancestors; larval forms are therefore of special interest
-in this connection. A very wide-spread form of larva, more advanced in
-its structure than the little Gastrula that has been already named, has
-received the name of Trochosphere or Wheel-ball (Fig. 7), because it
-swims round and round, by means of cilia, usually distributed in bands.
-Its inner or stomach-layer, forms a definite alimentary canal, and is
-separated by a very simple mesoderm from the outside ciliated layer,
-which presents certain differences in form, according as the creature
-belongs to one group of animals or to another. The main characters of
-the Trochosphere are, however, the same in very widely differing groups.
-These little larvæ give rise to one of the most eagerly debated problems
-of zoology. Are we to suppose that animals which possess a Trochosphere
-larva are all descended from one common ancestor? Or are we to think
-that the Trochosphere is a form of body very convenient for the
-necessities of juvenile existence in the sea, and therefore
-independently evolved by animals which are not directly related to each
-other? Some authorities take the latter view; the former is perhaps more
-widely accepted, and has even been expressed by the application of the
-name Trochophora (Wheel-carriers), as a general term for those groups in
-which such larvæ are found. These include some of the higher worms,
-which present the typical Trochosphere, the Brachiopoda, and the
-Polyzoa; while variations of the Trochosphere type are shown by the
-earliest larvæ of Mollusca, the larvæ of the Echinoderms, and those of
-the Hemichordata (see p. 33), the latter bringing us, as it were, within
-eye-shot of the Vertebrata themselves. It will be seen, therefore, that
-the range of the Trochosphere larva covers a large portion of the ground
-occupied by our Grade IV. There is, however, one marked exception: the
-Arthropoda, which seem to have a prejudice against cilia in any form
-(since they include but one animal which possess any) have no example of
-a ciliated larva. Even their simplest larval forms belong to a higher
-type of structure, in which the shelly, jointed structure characteristic
-of the group is already indicated.
-
-When we speak, however, of the occurrence of the Trochosphere throughout
-a wide range of animal life, it must be understood that its presence is
-not necessarily uniform throughout a group in which it occurs. Larval
-forms are adaptations which conform with the conditions of life for the
-particular animal in question: and nearly related kinds of animal may be
-without a larva. The Trochosphere larva is, of course, only adapted for
-aquatic existence, and is necessarily absent in the case of terrestrial
-forms.
-
-TABLE OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM[A]
-
- =Grade I.=--UNICELLULAR ANIMALS. PROTOZOA.
-
- (Intermediate forms, see p. 34.)
-
- =Grade II.=--TWO-LAYERED { SPONGES.
- ANIMALS. { COELENTERATA.
-
- =Grade III.=--THREE-LAYERED { PLATYHELMINTHES, OR FLAT-WORMS.
- ANIMALS. { VERMES, THE HIGHER FORMS.
-
- { ARTHROPODA.
- { MOLLUSCA.
- =Grade IV.=--COELOMATA, OR { BRACHIOPODA.
- THREE-LAYERED ANIMALS WITH A { BRYOZOA.
- BODY-CAVITY. { ECHINODERMATA.
- { TUNICATA OR ASCIDIANS. } =Chordata.=
- { VERTEBRATA. }
-
-[A] In the subsequent tables which show the respective sub-divisions of
-these chief groups, the larger only of the sub-divisions are named.
-
-When an animal has no free larva, but quits the egg in a form
-practically identical with that of the adult, the development is said to
-be "direct." But changes equally startling with those displayed when a
-larva develops into the adult form, may take place while the young
-animal is enclosed within the egg itself. To these also zoologists apply
-the axiom referred to above, that the history of the individual
-summarises the history of the race. Thus, for example, the Amphibian
-larva, _e.g._ the tadpole of a frog (p. 153) has gills, which disappear
-in the adult form: the young reptile, bird, or mammal, which has no
-larval stage, has gills during a comparatively early stage; and loses
-them at a later period of its development. In each case zoologists
-conclude that the animal is descended from a fish-like ancestor, which
-possessed gills all its life, and that the more immediate ancestors in
-the family tree, have lost their gills by degrees.
-
-The study of the progressive changes of young forms, whether larval, or
-enclosed within the egg, is called Embryology, and constitutes, in these
-days, the major branch of zoological science. That it is of paramount
-importance to the student of classification, engaged upon the sorting of
-the animal kingdom, will be apparent from what has been stated above.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IV
-
-THE ONE-CELLED ANIMALS OR PROTOZOA
-
-
-Some idea of the general characteristics of the Protozoa has already
-been given by the description of _Amoeba_. We may now say something
-about special groups of the Protozoa, which have minor characteristics
-of their own.
-
-Amoeba belongs to the class Rhizopoda, as has been already stated; but
-there are many of the Rhizopoda that greatly differ from Amoeba in
-appearance. The possession of a shell or skeleton gives a special
-importance to several groups. For, as the reader has no doubt already
-learnt from an earlier volume in this series, such skeletons or shells
-have played an important part in the history of the earth's surface,
-building up geological strata of vast extent, by the accumulation of the
-shells left after the decay of the owners' tiny bodies, during long
-periods of time. The chalk rocks that form the "white cliffs of Albion,"
-and that are so widely distributed in other parts of the globe, are
-formed in this manner; while the ooze of the Atlantic and other oceans,
-similarly composed of Protozoan _débris_, is now at the present time
-building up what will be the chalk rocks of future ages. Some of these
-Protozoans attain a remarkable size, instead of being microscopic, as is
-the case typically with the one-celled animals. Some forms of the
-Foraminifera found on the coast of North America measure as much as
-one-fifth of an inch across, while in warmer seas there are kinds which
-attain, as did the extinct Nummulite of Egypt, the size of a bean. Two
-inches across is mentioned as the maximum diameter, however, of either
-extinct or living forms. The Foraminifera are sometimes named
-Reticularia, because their pseudopodia interlace.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 8.--Fossil Skeletons of Polycystina, from the
-so-called "Infusorial Earth" of Barbadoes, highly magnified.]
-
-The Foraminifera have shells composed of carbonate of lime, but there
-are other forms that build up geological deposits, in which the shell
-is flinty. The diagram (Fig. 8) shows some fossil shells of Protozoa
-from the marl of Barbadoes. These constitute a deposit which was named
-"Infusorial earth," in the earlier days of microscopic observation, when
-all Protozoans were spoken of as Infusoria. The name, Infusoria, it must
-be recollected, is now restricted to a special class, to which the forms
-in question do not belong. These fossil forms were named Polycystina,
-and are still often spoken of under that name, although the animals that
-present the peculiar feature of possessing "more than one cyst" now are
-called Radiolarians. The "cyst" consists of a basket-work supporting
-skeleton of flint; there may be several, one inside the other, and
-connected by radial bars. A living species named _Actinomma_ has three
-such layers of basket-work, one in the outer layer of protoplasm, one in
-the inner layer, and a central one. It will perhaps be remembered by the
-reader that the animals of this group, Radiolaria, are forms described
-in a previous volume of the series, as so curiously associated in
-Symbiosis with the algæ known as Yellow Cells.
-
-The famous polishing slate of Bilin in Bohemia consists of flinty
-Protozoan shells; it is 14 feet thick, and a cubic inch has been
-estimated to contain 41,000,000,000 of the shells.
-
-While the Radiolarians are marine, the Heliozoa, a group in which
-the skeleton is also present, but not usually so greatly developed,
-are predominantly fresh-water forms. Both classes take their name
-(Ray-animals, Sun-animals) from the stiff radiating rods of the
-skeleton.
-
-Strongly to be contrasted with the above groups belonging to the
-Rhizopoda are the Infusoria proper, which are characterized by the usual
-possession of cilia. Cilia (literally "eyelashes") are fine hair-like
-processes of the protoplasm of the cell, which fringe its exterior; by
-their constant movement they enable the animal to swim, and at the same
-time they create a current in the water, which washes up to the region
-of the mouth particles which may serve for food; for these creatures
-have this very great advantage over Amoeba, and the other forms above
-referred to, that they possess something which may be called a mouth.
-That is to say, there is one particular spot of the surface where
-particles are taken in. This may seem to be a restriction, when we
-compare the Infusorian with Amoeba, which is apparently able to take in
-food at any part of the surface. But it is a restriction which is
-associated with an advantage; the Infusorian cell, namely, has a firm
-exterior with a definite outline, instead of being soft and mobile all
-over. The firmer exterior layer of protoplasm, which is in turn covered
-by a thin cuticle or limiting membrane, is called the cortex or rind.
-For this reason the name Corticata is sometimes given to the group,
-_i.e._, Protozoa with a rind.
-
-_Vorticella_, the Bell Animalcule, is a stalked form living in ditches,
-which is usually selected as a typical form of the Infusoria. It
-receives its name, the Whirlpool Animal, from the current which its
-cilia create in the water. The purpose of this current is to wash food
-particles into the mouth. Associated with the Infusoria under the name
-of Corticata are the Gregarina and some other parasitic forms.
-
-It is interesting to note that the main types of the unicellular animals
-are repeated again in the cells of different parts of the bodies of
-multicellular animals. Amoeboid cells, so called because of their
-mobility and general resemblance to Amoeba, are found in various parts
-of the higher animals. The lymph corpuscles of vertebrata, and the white
-corpuscles of vertebrate blood, as well as the blood corpuscles of
-invertebrates, are among the instances of this. There are cells, on the
-contrary, such as those that line the mucous tracts, which are of a
-Vorticella type, so to speak; fixed to their bases, and presenting cilia
-on the free aspect.
-
-Two things must be noticed before we leave the subject of the Protozoa.
-One is, that some forms present the beginning of a multicellular
-condition. Several units sometimes join together, and in this way a
-complex object may be formed, in which there are several nuclei; or the
-original unit may keep on growing till it consists of many successive
-portions, and in some of them a fresh nucleus may arise. This occurs in
-some of the Foraminifera.
-
-The next thing to be noticed is, that there are a number of organisms
-which constitute a debateable ground, and are claimed now by the
-botanist, and now by the zoologist. While the latter insists on calling
-them Protozoa (Primitive Animals) the former would have them Protophyta
-(Primitive Plants). The fact is that in these organisms of the first
-grade, the distinction between "plant" and "animal" has not become a
-hard and fast line; and the disputed forms may be best described as
-links between the two. The chemistry of nutrition is probably more to be
-relied upon as a distinction, than the difference of structure. It is
-here that the two groups, plants and animals, start upon different
-roads, and many of the differences in structure must be regarded as the
-direct result of the fundamental difference in the mode of nutrition.
-The following very instructive remarks on the subject are taken from
-Professor Hertwig's valuable book "The Biological Problem of To-Day,"[B]
-pp. 111, 112.
-
-[B] "The Biological Problem of To-Day, Preformation or Epigenesis," by
-Professor O. Hertwig. Translated by P. C. Mitchell. Heinemann, 1896.
-
-"The different mode of nutrition of animals results in a totally
-different structural plan. Animal cells absorb material that is already
-organised, and that they may do so their cells are either quite naked,
-so affording an easy passage for solid particles, or they are clothed
-only by a thin membrane, through which solutions of slightly diffusible
-organic colloids may pass. Therefore, unlike plants, multicellular
-animals display a compact structure with internal organs adapted to the
-different conditions which result from the method of nutrition peculiar
-to animals. A unicellular animal takes organic particles bodily into its
-protoplasm, and forming around them temporary cavities known as food
-vacuoles, treats them chemically. The multicellular animal has become
-shaped so as to enclose a space within its body, into which solid
-organic food-particles are carried and digested thereafter in a state of
-solution, to be shared by the single cells lining the cavity. In this
-way the animal body does not require so close a relation with the medium
-surrounding it; its food, the first requirement of an organism, is
-distributed to it from inside outwards. In its further complication the
-animal organisation proceeds along the same lines. The system of
-internal hollows becomes more complicated by the specialisation of
-secreting surfaces, and by the formation of an alimentary canal, and of
-a body-cavity separate from the alimentary canal. In plants it is the
-external surface that is increased as much as possible. In animals, in
-obedience to their different requirements, increase takes place in the
-internal surface. The specialisation of plants displays itself in organs
-externally visible--in leaves, twigs, flowers, and tendrils. The
-specialisation of animals is concealed within the body, for the internal
-surface is the starting-point for the formation of the organs and
-tissues."
-
- TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROTOZOA
-
- =Grade I.= { RHIZOPODA, OR
- { GYMNOMYXA.
- UNICELLULAR ANIMALS. =PROTOZOA= {
- { INFUSORIA, OR
- { CORTICATA.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER V
-
-THE COELENTERATA
-
-
-Next after the animals that consist of one cell only we have to consider
-the group of animals among which the lower kinds, at any rate, consist
-of a number of cells arranged in two layers. The representative of this
-group that the reader is most likely to meet with is the Sea-Anemone,
-the Coral animal probably he will be content to know from pictures.
-
-Everybody who has been accustomed to take a little interest in natural
-history, remembers the use of the old-fashioned term "Zoophyte." It was
-a name given to animals like those named above, which have a flower-like
-appearance, due to the possession of a set of petal-like arms or
-tentacles, placed all round the mouth; its literal meaning was animal
-plant, in allusion to the flower-like form. The great French zoologist,
-Cuvier, gave the group name Radiata to animals of this kind. This name
-is now not much used, because we have learnt to emphasize other
-peculiarities possessed by these animals, as well as that of radial
-symmetry, viz., their two-layered body-wall and simple digestive space
-(see p. 36). The group called Radiata by Cuvier, included, too, a number
-of animals which are widely separated from the "Zoophytes" in modern
-systems of classification.
-
-Sea-Anemones may be found on almost every rocky part of the English
-shores. Look for them in pools towards low-tide mark; if uncovered by
-the water, they will be found with the arms drawn in, so that the animal
-looks merely like a small round knob of shiny opaque coloured jelly; if
-covered by the water, they will usually be found open, that is to say,
-with the arms (often called Tentacles) spread out. In the middle of the
-circle of arms is the mouth; and the apparent "flower" possesses an
-excellent appetite, as will readily be seen if any unfortunate little
-shrimp or sea-snail should come within reach of the arms. The latter
-will then at once contract upon it, and draw it into the mouth. Touch
-any of the common Sea-Anemones, and you will find that it is firmly
-fixed to the rock; at an early period of life it becomes fixed, and
-practically it remains always in one place, although a slight movement
-of the base is sometimes possible. Hence the advantage of the "radial"
-structure, for the arms reach equally in all directions round that most
-important centre of activity, the mouth. The most common kind of
-Sea-Anemone is of a dull dark red colour, and small in size; but others
-are large and brilliant in colouring. No uncoloured drawing would convey
-much idea of their beauty: the reader should consult the works of the
-late P. Gosse, an authority on Sea-Anemones, in whose books many
-beautiful illustrations will be found.
-
-A much smaller animal than the Sea-Anemone is found in fresh water and
-is called _Hydra_. Its arms or tentacles are longer in proportion to its
-body, especially in one species, than is the case in the Sea-Anemones.
-Hence its name, fancifully derived from the seven-headed serpent of
-Greek Mythology, the Hydra killed by Hercules, which may be supposed to
-have presented a similar straggling appearance. The diagram on page 36
-represents a section through the middle of the body, only without the
-arms.
-
-Unlike the Sea-Anemone, the Hydra can walk about. This it does in a very
-awkward manner, much in the same way as the Caterpillar known as the
-"Looper," clinging first with the front and then with the back extremity
-of the body (for head and tail they can hardly be called in so simple an
-animal as the _Hydra_, although the Looper caterpillar boasts both head
-and tail).
-
-The _Hydra_ is so small an animal that it appears to the unaided eye
-merely as a tiny speck. It may be found anywhere in British ponds and
-ditches, standing on water-weeds. Like the Sea-Anemone it preys on
-animals smaller than itself. Nature has provided it with minute stinging
-cells, which benumb its prey; and in this all the animals of the
-Coelenterate group resemble it.
-
-One of the most curious things about the Hydra is, that it often throws
-out buds. It can, of course, produce eggs which are fertilized and
-hatched in the usual way of eggs; the buds are an additional way of
-multiplying itself.[C]
-
-[C] We may recall in comparison the way trees may be propagated by slips
-independently of flowers producing the seeds of the trees.
-
-These buds are at first merely swellings, in which both of the layers
-of the body join: they grow larger; become provided with tentacles and
-a mouth, like the parent, and finally are cast off as independent
-animals.
-
-For this reason the group to which _Hydra_ belongs has received the name
-of Eleutheroblasteæ, the animals with free buds. But Hydra has many near
-relations in which these buds are not so cast off, but remain attached
-to the parent; and they in turn may produce others which also remain
-attached.
-
-In this way, groups or colonies are formed, consisting of large numbers
-of individuals, and possessing a common stalk or stock which is formed
-by degrees as the process of multiplication goes on. The corals and the
-corallines are familiar examples of this.
-
-The matter is complicated by the fact that either the separate animals
-or the flesh of the stock, or both, may secrete within themselves a hard
-supporting structure forming what is known as Corals. This may be
-developed in such a complicated manner, that instead of the coral
-appearing to be the product of the animal, the animal seems to be
-inserted in the coral, into which indeed it can retract itself for
-shelter.
-
-The Corallines, on the contrary, secrete a leathery coating or sheath
-outside themselves and the stock. The leathery case is fairly
-transparent, so that on magnifying the creature the flesh of the common
-stock, as well as of the stalks of individual animals, may be seen
-inside. The "heads" of the animals poke out at the end of each branch
-(see Fig. 9).
-
-The _Hydra_, with which we started, had always the power of producing
-eggs; each animal could do so, besides producing buds. But in our
-Colonial Coralline this is not necessarily so. Some individuals lose the
-power of producing eggs. Others can do nothing else, and become greatly
-altered in structure, often losing the power of developing tentacles,
-and exhibiting other changes. So much are they altered sometimes that
-they seem to be mere buds, not separate animals at all.
-
-In other cases a still more surprising thing happens. The bud that is
-destined to produce eggs falls off, and becomes quite independent of the
-colony; more than this, it becomes quite different in appearance from
-the members of the colony: and instead of being a Hydra-like animal it
-becomes a jelly-fish. But the eggs of this jelly-fish do not produce
-jelly-fishes: they produce a more or less Hydra-like animal which gives
-rise by budding to a fresh colony. This is what is known to Zoologists
-as "alternation of generations."
-
-Now comes a puzzling question--Which part of this family group shall we
-select and call it an "animal"? Is each Hydroid of the colony an animal,
-and the jelly-fish another animal? Zoologists say "No": from the
-development of one egg, to the production of another, is the cycle that
-constitutes an individual animal. So we have the puzzling result in
-nomenclature, that an "individual" consists of a very large colony of
-creatures in one place, together with a perfect shoal of creatures quite
-unlike it, floating miles away from it on the ocean. What name must we
-give to the units, so curiously connected with one another? Zoologists
-call them "Zooids" (animal-like parts) or "persons."
-
-This is the story of the jelly-fish as originally told. But there are
-innumerable variations upon it. There are kinds of jelly-fish that
-produce jelly-fish and have no Hydroid stage at all. Sometimes the
-"persons" of the colony present many varieties, each taking up some
-different task for the community. Some may be "nutritive persons,"
-_i.e._ commonplace Zooids that have mouths and eat food; some
-"protective persons," reduced to mere folds or sheathing processes to
-guard the others; some are "stinging persons" armed with enormous
-quantities of thread cells. Then the whole colony may be like the
-jelly-fish, a floating affair, and not fixed at all.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 9.--An example of the Hydrozoa. A, branch of a
-Coralline, _Sertularia Ellisii_, magnified. B, the same, more highly
-magnified.]
-
-We have several times above referred to the animals known as corallines.
-It may almost be assumed that the ordinary reader knows what these are;
-if not, a little search among the treasures of the sea-shore will almost
-certainly reveal some of them, living or dead. The texture and
-appearance of the dead stems remind one of soft horn or dried gelatine;
-the branching arrangement of the stems and the little cells disposed at
-the ends of the branches will easily be shown under slight
-magnification. Most people will remember the rage for dyed corallines,
-by which all the fancy shops and florists were possessed a few years
-ago. The corallines, dyed a bright emerald green, or a dull red, which
-were used for decorations at that time, were usually a variety of the
-Bottle-brush Coralline, found on English shores; but sometimes commoner
-kinds were employed.
-
-Fig. 9 shows an example of a coralline, slightly magnified in A, and in
-B much more highly magnified, so as to show the individual hydra-like
-zooids, each with its circle of tentacula.
-
-The Sea-Anemone and the Hydra respectively represent the two great
-groups of the Coelenterata, named after them, the Anthozoa
-(Flower-animals), and the Hydrozoa (Hydra-animals). The corals are
-forms of the Anthozoa, single or colonial, which possess a skeleton.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 10.--_Gorgonia verrucosa_, from Guernsey, nearly
-one-third of the natural size.]
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 11.--Corals. _A_, _Acanthoporia horrida_.
-_B_, _Meandrina strigosa_. _C_, _Madrepora divaricata_. _D_, _Fungia
-papillosa_. _E_, Red Coral, _Corallium rubrum_. _F_, _Stylaster
-sanguineus_.]
-
-The above diagram shows examples of the Anthozoa. Fig. 10 is _Gorgonia_,
-the Sea-Fan; while Fig. 11 represents corals of six different kinds.
-
-Besides the two great groups we have named, the Hydra-like animals
-and the Sea-Anemone-like animals, the Coelenterata contain a third
-group, the Ctenophora, or Comb-bearers, so called on account of their
-possessing bands of cilia, fancifully compared to the teeth of a comb.
-At first sight most of them somewhat resemble jelly-fishes, being
-transparent forms swimming near the surface of the sea. They are
-carnivorous, and some of them highly phosphorescent at night. The
-gastric cavity is divided up into branches. The representatives of the
-Ctenophores, most often seen on our own coasts, are small rounded forms.
-
-Two remarks must be added before quitting the subject of the
-Coelenterata.
-
-Firstly, the description of them as two-layered Animals is one that only
-applies typically and to the simpler forms. In others, such as the
-jelly-fishes, there is an intermediate layer of jelly, which appears to
-acquire a cellular structure by the immigration of cells derived from
-the primary layers. Thus we see, within the group of the Coelenterata,
-the gradual establishment of that third body-layer, which is found in
-all animals of higher structure. Scarcely indicated in _Hydra_, as a
-faint trace of a boundary-line (lamella) between the ectoderm and
-endoderm, it attains a good thickness in the Jelly-fish and Ctenophora.
-In animals of higher structure the third body-layer, being now fully
-established, is cellular from its beginning in the embryo; in the
-Coelenterata its gradual formation is to be traced.
-
-Secondly, it must be remarked that the colonial structure and the
-arrangement sometimes concomitant with it of "alternation of
-generations," is by no means confined to the Coelenterata. Both are seen
-in other forms of life, in which the units, or zooids, differ greatly in
-structure from those of this group.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE COELENTERATA
-
-
- { HYDROZOA, or
- { HYDRA-LIKE
- { ANIMALS.
- =Grade II.= {
- {
- THE TWO-LAYERED =COELENTERATA.= { ACTINOZOA, or
- ANIMALS. { SEA-ANEMONE-LIKE
- { ANIMALS.
- {
- {
- { CTENOPHORA.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VI
-
-THE SPONGES
-
-
-Many who are familiar with the domestic sponge have never seen a sponge
-in a growing state, and would find it almost impossible to realise that
-a sponge may be a thing of beauty. And yet sponges are quite common on
-the rocky shores of our own country. It is true that they do not form
-large masses, like the sponges grown in warmer seas, which we import;
-but the smaller growths, massed together, often cover a considerable
-space of rock, and are conspicuous by their beautiful colouring. Some
-sponges are crimson, and some green; while one of the commonest is a
-brilliant orange-yellow. The latter may often be found near low-tide
-mark, on a shelf of rock under growing seaweed. If the explorer has
-any doubt what the object is, it may easily be identified by the
-touch, which though moist and firm in the growing state, is still the
-unmistakable "feel" of sponge. Where the receding tide exposes a large
-surface of steep rock, for instance in caves, sponges may be found
-covering the rocks as thickly as mosses do on land. Masses of dead
-sponge, consisting of branching parallel fingers a few inches long, may
-often be found in the dead state, washed up on the shore; these are the
-usual drab colour of a dead sponge.
-
-The encrusting sponges which grow on rocks present a mass, so to speak,
-of little hillocks: in kinds which attain a larger growth, these may
-almost be described as branches. Each little hillock or branch has
-a hole at the top; and on the exterior of the rounded mass of the
-bath-sponge may be found numbers of such holes. We should naturally
-suppose that these holes were the mouths of the various sponge branches,
-especially since they lead to the central cavity of the branch, and thus
-to that of the whole sponge; and indeed they are known by the Latin name
-of "oscula," little mouths. They are, however, nothing of the sort;
-the sponge once had a mouth, a single one, when it was young, but the
-adult sponge has lost it. For the young sponge is at first a little
-free-swimming, two-layered animal of the type which has been described
-above as the gastrula larva. When it gets old enough to settle down in
-life, it sinks upon some suitable surface, and becomes fixed to it,
-mouth downward: the mouth is thus lost. How, then, is the animal to be
-fed? As it grows, there is developed in its substance a system of hollow
-spaces, which communicate with the exterior by means of microscopic
-pores. Through the latter, water is drawn in, and passes, after devious
-wanderings, to the central cavity of the animal, whence it is expelled
-by the so-called osculum. At first, the young sponge has but one cavity
-and one osculum; but by degrees the sponge branches and spreads, the
-cavity of each new portion remaining in connection with the main cavity.
-If, as they grow in size, the branches touch one another, they sometimes
-coalesce--a fact which renders the growth of the sponge in some cases a
-very complicated matter.
-
-It will be seen from the above description that the sponge is a sort of
-living filter. As the water passes in through the pores, it deposits in
-the substance of the sponge all the little organisms that it contains;
-on these the sponge feeds.
-
-It will naturally be asked, how does this living filter work? Water will
-not pass through small holes to flow out again at large ones in an
-upward direction, unless helped by some mechanism. How is this supplied?
-By the industry of the cells of the sponge. Its canal-system includes a
-set of wide chambers, lined with cells which have long cilia, called
-flagella. These flagella, constantly moving in one direction (like the
-fan of a ventilator), create a current, which passes the water on with
-such force that it reaches the central cavity, whence it is expelled
-through the oscula. These chambers do not communicate directly with
-the exterior. They are closed, except at certain small holes, the
-"prosopyles," where they take in the water that enters from spaces
-connected with the pores. At the main end of the chamber is an aperture
-called the "apopyle," capable of being partly closed, and leading into
-an excurrent passage. This last communicates with the central cavity of
-the sponge.
-
-It will be seen that the topography of the sponge is a very complicated
-business. All its details have been studied by means of thin sections
-specially prepared and placed under the microscope (see p. 183); in
-these the labyrinth of canals and chambers is seen cut through at
-various points; the cells lining them and dividing them may be
-individually studied. The passage of water through the sponge was first
-observed by Robert Grant; many of the most recent discoveries regarding
-the structure of sponges we owe to Professor Sollas.
-
-We have not yet explained what our living filter does with its food
-when it gets it. The ciliated cells of the internal lining take in solid
-particles just as Amoeba does; and from these they may be passed on to
-the cells of the middle layer, amoeboid cells, which can move about.
-These cells are considered to be derived from the primary layers of the
-body, especially the inner one, and to have wandered into a cellless
-middle layer, comparable in nature with that of some Coelenterates.
-
-The sponge is full of firm or gritty particles, which form its skeleton,
-and remain when the sponge is dead, and the softer parts decayed. These,
-when magnified, often present beautiful and curious shapes. The use of
-them is not only to support the body, but also to prevent the sponge
-from being eaten by other animals.
-
-There is found in the English canals and rivers a small, fresh-water
-sponge, usually greenish in colour. This is named _Spongilla
-fluviatilis_, the River-sponge, and affords an exception to the usual
-marine distribution of sponges. In the winter it dies gradually away, at
-the same time forming asexual buds, or "gemmules," in the interior of
-its substance, which are liberated in the spring, and become young
-sponges.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF SPONGES
-
- { CALCAREA, WITH CALCAREOUS
- { =PORIFERA.= { SKELETON.
- =Grade II.= { {
- Two-Layered { {
- Animals, or { { NON-CALCAREA, WITH
- Acoclomata. { { SKELETON ABSENT OR
- { { FLINTY.
- { =COELENTERATA.=
-
-Some of the marine sponges are parasitic. Most people have doubtless
-found on the sea-shore now and then a dead oyster-shell, completely
-riddled with small round holes, very similar in appearance to those seen
-in "worm-eaten" wood. These are the work of _Clione_, a parasitic sponge
-which is very fatal to the oyster. At first sight it seems a puzzle how
-the sponge made its way into the hard shell; it has no mouth to bite or
-suck its way into the solid substance. The cells of the sponge, however,
-wear away the lime of the shell by means of some acid chemical action.
-Not only so, but they can attack stones as well, when these consist of
-limestone; and on some parts of the coast bits of sponge-eaten limestone
-washed up on the beach are quite common objects. They are pierced all
-through by holes, so that their appearance would suggest a sponge carved
-in stone, but for the fact that the holes are fairly uniform in size.
-Such stones, lying on the shore, often puzzle the finder, when they
-contain no apparent trace of the tenant that has worked its way through
-them.
-
-The sponges have received the name of Porifera, on account of the
-structure above described. They are often classed with the Coelenterata,
-because, among other reasons, they practically belong to the two-layered
-type of structure, and because they form a complex organism that may
-almost be called a colony. But some prefer to place them in a group by
-themselves, apart from the Coelenterata. The chief reason of this
-is that the sponges, as compared with a primitive two-layered type
-indicated by their own larvæ, are turned upside down, the mouth being,
-as above stated, originally situated at the fixed end.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VII
-
-WORMS
-
-
-When the great naturalist, Linnæus, framed his classification of the
-animal kingdom, he included in the division Vermes or Worms, nearly
-everything except the vertebrates and insects.
-
-This assemblage would have been more correctly styled if instead of
-"Vermes" it had been described as "animals unsorted." Subsequent
-zoologists have by degrees picked out and separated from the Vermes
-first one group of animals and then another. But the process is still
-going on, and several of the groups which are still classed under the
-name of "worms" might, with very great justification, be separated from
-each other; it is custom, rather than family resemblance, that accounts
-for their being retained under one heading.
-
-Widely although the various "worms" may differ from one another, one
-thing may be stated regarding the most of them, and that is, that
-they "crawl"; that is to say, they move along by means of successive
-contractions of successive parts of the muscular wall of their elongated
-bodies. This "crawling" mode of progress is the chief thing involved
-in the popular idea of a worm; but the popular definition of a
-worm includes also the larvæ of insects, such as caterpillars and
-beetle-grubs. The latter, it must be noted, crawl with the assistance
-of legs, while the true worms crawl without any such assistance. Any
-adornments that they may possess, whatever else they may be, are not
-legs.
-
-The worms were formerly included along with the insects and lobsters, in
-a division called Annulosa, or, Ring-bodied animals, but it has now long
-been recognised that the latter are worthy of a division to themselves.
-It will easily be seen, however, that the term Ring-bodied animals is
-very appropriate to all of them. If we look at either an earthworm or
-a lobster, we can but recognise that the body consists of a number of
-successive parts very similar to each other; and since the body of
-each is, in section, more or less round, these successive parts may
-very aptly be termed rings. Modern writers, however, prefer to call
-these parts not rings, but Metameres, _i.e._ successive parts. The
-symmetrical arrangement of the body in a series of such parts is
-called "Metamerism"; and the animals which possess it are said to be
-"Metameric" in structure. Sometimes also the successive parts are spoken
-of as "segments." Compare Fig. 12; _A_ and _C_ show the successive
-body-rings of worms.
-
-The earthworm, with its many rings, is one of the higher forms among
-the worms. Among the lowest forms there are worms in which the ring
-structure cannot be detected. Between the limits thus marked out, there
-lies, so to speak, the battleground of modern zoology. For the origin of
-metamerism, and the pedigree of vertebrates, are among the questions
-that are being discussed in connection with various groups of the worms.
-
-Among the lowest forms of worms are the Planarian worms, already alluded
-to as examples of the third grade of animal existence. These belong
-to the class Turbellaria, which is represented by plenty of both
-fresh water and marine forms in our own country and on its coast. The
-Turbellaria are divided into groups called Acoela, Dendrocoela, and
-Rhabdocoela. These names allude to the intestine, which in the first
-group is wanting, in the second branched like a tree, and in the third
-straight. The Cestoda or tape-worms, which absorb nourishment through
-the skin, and therefore need no alimentary canal, and possess none; and
-the Trematodes, represented by the Liver-fluke, which infests sheep,
-together make up the group of flat-worms (Platyhelminthes), of which
-mention has already been made (p. 44). In all of them the body is more
-or less flat, and the digestive cavity, like that of Coelenterates, has
-but one opening, the mouth. The life-history of parasitic worms is
-described in a well-known volume by Leuckart, which forms the basis of
-our knowledge on the subject. Since its publication, discoveries
-regarding parasites have been constantly added by other observers.
-
-The history of the Liver-fluke is a most complicated example of
-alternation of generations. The adult form infests the sheep's liver.
-There it produces eggs, which afterwards find their way into water. Here
-they die unless they find their way into a certain water-snail, which
-many of them do. Within this snail--_Linnæa truncatula_--the egg
-develops into a sac-like body, called a sporocyst. This produces within
-itself numbers of a small creature which is called the Redia form. These
-in turn produce a tailed form, called a Cercaria, which gets out of the
-snail, swims in water, and finally settles down on some plant. Here it
-is eaten by an unfortunate sheep, within which it develops into the
-adult fluke.
-
-The other great divisions of the Vermes are as follows: The Nematodes
-or thread-worms, a group of parasites which includes the dreaded
-_Trichina_; the Nemertines, a group mostly carnivorous, possessing a
-curious proboscis, and often an armed skin; the Leeches or Hirudinea,
-and finally, the Chætopods (Bristle-footed Worms), the highest group
-of all, containing the forms often spoken of as Annelides--_i.e._
-Ring-shaped Worms.
-
-These last are again subdivided into the following: The Archiannelida or
-Primitive Annelids, some of which have a curious ciliated larva, already
-referred to (p. 42) as the typical Trochosphere or Wheel-ball; the
-Oligochæta (Few-Bristles), which include the familiar earthworms; and
-the Polychæta (Many-Bristles). Of the latter, some, the Tubicola, live
-in tubes which may or may not be fixed to some object; while others, the
-Errantia, or Wanderers, are free and very active. _Nereis_, the Rainbow
-Worm (p. 159) may be named as an example. Our illustration shows
-instances of each group. _A_ is the Sea-Mouse, a bristly creature so
-named by some very imaginative person. It has two kinds of bristles,
-long and short, the former being possessed of a peculiar lustre (see p.
-73). _C_ is _Syllis_, one of a very curious family of worms. In both _A_
-and _C_ are seen a row of paired appendages; these are not "legs," but
-expansions called "parapodia" which serve the purpose of legs, besides
-which they frequently act as breathing organs, a special part being
-appropriated to this purpose. Each of these animals is active and
-carnivorous, and has a head. The Syllidæ are remarkable for the very
-peculiar way in which they divide, new individuals being formed and
-cast off from the end of the body. There is, however, a deep-sea form
-of _Syllis_ which divides in a very odd manner, giving rise to new
-individuals placed transversely. The result is a most extraordinary
-looking creature, a network of worms with numerous heads, each branch
-being eventually provided with one of its own.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 12.--Worms. _A_, a Sea-Mouse, _Aphrodite
-aculeata_; _B_, _Terebella littoralis_; _C_, _Syllis_; _D_,
-_Serpula vermicularis_; _E_, _Spirorbis nautiloides_, on a piece of
-seaweed.]
-
-The tube-dwelling worms are represented in our picture by _Terebella_,
-_Serpula_ and _Spirorbis_, all very common forms on the English coasts.
-The _Terebella_ glues around its body a number of grains of sand and
-bits of shell, thus forming a case; the projecting threads at the head
-end are the gill-filaments, borne by the anterior segments of the body.
-These are plumed; the thread-like structures which are seen to lie in
-front of them are the tentacles or feelers. _D_, _Serpula_, is common
-on shells and stones. The animal has a plumy bunch of gill-filaments,
-brilliantly coloured, and a stopper with which it can close the mouth
-of its tube. This precaution is necessary to keep out its predatory
-cousins belonging to the Errantia, who poke in their heads and eat the
-tube-dwelling worms. _E_ is _Spirorbis_, a minute form with a coiled
-tube, which looks at first sight like a small univalve shell. It is
-common everywhere, on shells and stones, and encrusting Fuci and other
-seaweeds, which it sometimes covers almost completely. Spirorbis also
-has plume-like gills and a stopper. In the latter is a cavity where the
-creature's eggs are incubated for a time.
-
-The reader will have no difficulty in finding and identifying both
-_Serpula_ and _Spirorbis_. _Terebella_ is frequently washed up on a
-sandy shore. On the Lancashire coast one may feel sure of finding this
-and many other sand-dwelling animals, after an east wind. The east wind,
-driving back the water at low tide, kills these creatures with cold,
-and presently they are washed up dead or dying by the high tide.
-_Pectinaria_, another worm with a tube of sand-grains, in which,
-however, the body lies loosely within the tube, may also be found in
-thousands under the same circumstances.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF VERMES OR WORMS
-
- =Grade III.= { {
- WITH MESODERM, { PLATYHELMINTHES, { _A._ TURBELLARIA or PLANARIANS.
- BUT WITHOUT { or FLAT-WORMS. { _B._ CESTODA or TAPE-WORMS.
- BODY-CAVITY. { { _C._ TREMATODA or FLUKE-WORMS.
-
- =Grade IV.= { NEMERTINES.
- WITH MESODERM { NEMATODA or THREAD-WORMS.
- AND { HIRUDINIA
- BODY-CAVITY. { or LEECHES. { _A._ ARCHIANNELIDS.
- { {
- { CHÆTOPODA. { _B._ OLIGOCHÆTA.
- {
- { _C._ POLYCHÆTA. { (_a_) Tubieola.
- { (_b_) Errantia.
-
-We must not forget to say something regarding the most commonly known
-member of the Vermes, the familiar earthworm. The worms are the first of
-the great group of animal life in which we find true land animals. There
-are terrestrial forms among the lowest worms, at least forms that live
-in earth that is damp; but the earthworm is in the strictest sense a
-terrestrial animal. Darwin showed that it not only dwells in the soil,
-but is in a sense the manufacturer of soil, since the fertility of the
-earth depends greatly upon the work of earthworms. They pass the soil
-through their bodies, digesting the organic particles they find in it,
-and thereby loosen the soil, reduce it to a state of fine division, and
-render it more fit to support the growth of plants. The "worm-casts"
-formed by the soil that the earthworm has passed through its body may
-not have been noticed by everybody. More obvious are the worm-casts in
-sand left by the sand-dwelling marine annelids. These everyone must have
-seen who has walked on a sandy shore at low tide.
-
-The worms include many puzzling forms, which have not been alluded to
-here. Among these must not be forgotten the Rotifers, or wheel-bearing
-animals. These are of minute size, and when first discovered were
-therefore placed amongst the Infusoria. They are common in ponds.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VIII
-
-ARTHROPODA, THE LOBSTERS, SPIDERS AND INSECTS
-
-
-The above is a very descriptive name for a division which includes the
-Crabs and Lobsters and the Insects. Formerly they were included, along
-with the worms, under the name Annulosa, the Ringed Animals. They
-resemble these as possessing what is termed metameric symmetry, but
-they are distinguished from them as the Leggy Animals, a fact which is
-explained in the name, Arthropoda, joint-footed. Worms, as we have seen,
-have no true legs, but the Arthropods, theoretically, have a pair of
-legs to every ring. In some of the lower members of the group this is
-literally the case, the Centipedes, or hundred-footed animals, for
-example (Fig. 13). In higher forms the number of legs is greatly
-reduced; several successive rings may become merged with one another,
-losing, along with their independence, their legs. The true Insects,
-thus, have only three pairs of legs and the Spiders four.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 13.--A Centipede, _Lithobius elongatus_, from Tunis,
-slightly reduced in size.]
-
-What are theoretically regarded as legs, however, may practically be
-turned to many other uses, according to the position of the particular
-body-ring to which they are attached. Thus, in the case of a body-ring
-near the mouth, we find such things as "jaw-feet," maxillipedes--that is
-to say, legs used for jaws. It consequently results that zoologists are
-sometimes driven to speak of "walking legs," or, hiding the tautology
-under a Latin phrase, "ambulatory legs"; and absurd although this may
-seem, it is sometimes quite necessary for the sake of accuracy. It is
-therefore more convenient to speak of the "appendages" of a body-ring
-than of its legs. For this vague term can be applied equally to all the
-row, whatever their uses. Among the different forms taken by the
-"appendages" are those of "antennæ," long, hair-like feelers attached to
-the head; "chelæ," or claws, such as the large claws of the lobster;
-"cheliceræ," or "claw-horns," tearing appendages attached to the head;
-"mandibles," mouth appendages used for biting, etc., etc. The reader who
-wishes to attain a clear idea of the structure of a segmented animal,
-and of the ways in which its parts are modified, should consult Huxley's
-classical study of "The Crayfish" (International Science Series).
-
-The Arthropoda include two main groups--the Crustacea, or Jointed
-Animals of the water, which breathe by gills; the Insects, or Jointed
-Animals of the land, which breathe through tubes in their sides, called
-tracheæ.
-
-The Crustacea include the familiar Crabs and Lobsters. These are among
-their highest forms as well as their largest, and if we begin at the
-beginning we must seek much smaller forms. The group called Entomostraca
-include the so-called Freshwater Flea, a very active little thing found
-in English ditches, and a great many other freshwater forms: also the
-little Cypris, which has a shield forming a sort of bivalve-shell, and
-is interesting from its wide occurrence as a fossil form. Most of the
-Entomostraca have a larval form called a Nauplius; but this larva
-refuses to tell us anything about the past history of the Arthropods. It
-is itself already a jointed animal with legs. So we see that the
-Arthropods, unlike the worms and the Chordata, have obliterated all
-record of their poor relations. The parasitic "fish-lice," so-called,
-are entomostracous Crustacea, often greatly degenerated in consequence
-of their habit of life. Some live in the gill-chambers of a fish, some
-on, or even embedded in the skin.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 14.--Shell of the Bell Barnacle, _Balanus
-tintinnabulum_, one-half the natural size. The figure shows several
-successive generations, perched one upon another.]
-
-Among the most curiously modified forms of the Crustacea are the
-Barnacles or Cirripedia. These creatures, like the sponges, have a
-free-swimming larvæ, which eventually fixes itself by its anterior end,
-so that the adult animal passes its existence upside down. The young is
-an ordinary little creature with jointed legs, but the adult protects
-itself by a strange armour of shell. An intermediate stage exists in
-which the creature eats no food; it has therefore been compared with the
-chrysalis of insects. At the top of the adult shell two little valves
-open and shut, allowing the legs to dart out and seize upon prey. These
-legs, gathered into a bunch, and extended and retracted together, remind
-one of the fingers of a hand opening and closing. They are clothed with
-a fringe of "cirrhi" or small processes; hence the name of the group.
-The Common Barnacle of our own shores, sometimes called the Acorn-Shell,
-is found on shells and stones, and often on those that are left
-uncovered between tides. In places where the rocks of the coast are
-very steep, a belt of white, several feet or yards deep, may often be
-seen above low-water mark. This white zone, when examined more nearly,
-is found to consist of barnacles, so crowded together that they obscure
-the natural colour of the rock. The Common Barnacle is one of the
-smaller species of the genus: in warmer seas barnacles attain to a much
-greater size (Figs. 14 and 15).
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 15.--Shells of a Barnacle, _Balanus hameri_, found
-in European and North American Seas, natural size.]
-
-The higher Crustacea, Malacostraca, include the familiar Crabs and
-Lobsters, Decapoda. The lobsters receive the name of Macrura or
-Big-tails; associated with them are the Shrimps and the Hermit-Crabs
-(Fig. 16). The latter are therefore not crabs at all, but somewhat
-divergent lobsters. Their tails are soft, and they thus require
-protection: they choose the dried shell of some univalve mollusc and
-live in it (Fig. 16). How far the case is that they need a house because
-their tails are soft, and how far the contrary is true that their tails
-are soft because they live in a house, it would be difficult to say.
-Readers of another volume in this series, Professor Hickson's "Story of
-Animal Life in the Sea," will remember that the hermit-crab often offers
-a curious instance of "commensalism" or partnership with other animals.
-The hermit-crab was, in fact, one of the earliest instances in which
-such a partnership was observed, the companion being in this case a
-sea-anemone perched on the shell in which the crab lives.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 16.--Hermit Crabs. _A_, _Aniculus typicus_, from
-the Indo-Pacific Seas, one-half of the natural size. _B_, _Caternus
-tibicen_, from the Indo Pacific Seas, slightly enlarged.]
-
-The true Crabs are called Brachyura, or Short-tails; for obvious
-reasons, the tail of a crab being very curiously modified and tucked in
-under the carapace or "shell." A form exceptional in the fact that
-frequents the land is the Land-Crab of the West Indies (Fig. 17).
-Another land crustacean, _Birgus latro_, the Robber Crab, belongs to the
-previous group.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 17.--Land Crab, _Gecarcinus ruricola_, from the West
-Indies, one-half of the natural size.]
-
-In addition to the above the Malacostraca include the Arthrostraca, or
-crustaceans which have the front of the body jointed as well as the
-tail, so that there is no large shield formed by the fused armour of
-several segments (cephalo-thoracic shield, _cf._ Figs. 16 and 17), as in
-crabs and lobsters. The Amphipoda, or Sand-hoppers, sometimes called
-Sand-fleas, are familiar examples of these. There are several common
-kinds found on our English shores, and sometimes they appear in such
-numbers, hopping above sand or seaweed left by the tide, that they seem
-to form a sort of cloud, every unit of which, however, is but in the air
-an instant, falling and giving place to some other, while it prepares
-for a fresh hop. The so-called Freshwater Shrimp, _Gammarus_, is another
-common member of the Amphipoda. Fig. 18 shows the general form of a
-Sand-hopper. Nearly allied are the Isopoda or Wood-lice, interesting
-because they are among the few terrestrial forms of the crustacea; they
-live, however, in damp places, and are but too well-known in gardens,
-where the gardener often mis-names them "insects."
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 18.--A Sand-hopper, _Pallasea Cancellus_, from
-Siberia, natural size.]
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 19.--A South American Spider, _Ctenus ferus_, from
-the Amazon region, natural size.]
-
-The mention of terrestrial forms would naturally bring us to the
-discussion of the true Insects. In the Arthropoda we for the first time
-meet with terrestrial animals except in scattered instances, and the
-true Insects are the largest and most important group of these. There
-are, however, various creatures belonging to the Arthropoda which are
-neither Crustacea nor yet Insects. Among these is the familiar spider,
-an "insect" in popular language, but not so described by the zoologist.
-Among other differences, the true spiders have eight legs, whereas the
-true insects have only six. Fig. 19 shows a typical spider; the eight
-jointed legs are attached to the thorax ("breastplate"); with the latter
-the head is united. The abdomen, as in insects, is formed by the fusion
-of several segments, and has no legs, but it has, however, out of sight,
-the spinning legs or "spinnerets," out of which the thread of the
-spider's web is spun. The venom of the spider is not a fable; spiders
-have poison-glands with ducts which open on the tops of the cheliceræ.
-They dispose of their prey by sucking it; they do not swallow solid
-food. The habits and webs of spiders are familiar to every one: their
-nests, as a rule, are only noticed by close observers. The nest is made
-of spun threads closely felted together to form a round hollow ball.
-This the house-spiders hang on a wall or among the rafters of a roof.
-There are, however, spiders which build their nests under ground; and in
-this case the nest may be conveniently furnished with a lid, which can
-be pushed up when the animal wishes to come out. Fig. 20 shows the nest
-of the Trap-door Spider, so called from the construction of its nest.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 20.--Nest of the Trap-door Spider, from the South of
-France, three-quarters of the natural size.]
-
-Fig. 21 shows a spider-like animal which, at first sight, seems to have
-five pairs of legs. In fact, however, it has only three pairs, thus
-approaching the insects in structure. These three pairs of legs are
-attached to the thorax, while the head, which is separate from the
-thorax, unlike that of the true spider, bears two pairs of leg-like
-appendages. This is the chief of a group which are sometimes placed in a
-class by themselves, on account of their great differences from real
-spiders. Their head is separated from the thorax; and the thorax is
-divided into three segments; these, however, do not come out clearly in
-the diagram. The head bears, posteriorly, a pair of appendages which
-are practically legs; in front of these a pair of long "pedipalps" or
-"foot-feelers"; and quite in front the comparatively short "cheliceræ."
-These creatures are very venomous; they move about by night to seek
-their prey.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 21.--A venomous spider-like animal, _Galeodes
-araneoides_, from North Africa, natural size (Diagrammatic).]
-
-Another kind of spider-like animal is familiar in English fields and
-waysides--the long-legged spiders, called Harvestmen or Phalangidæ,
-which spin no web, but jump upon their prey. Unlike the last group, the
-body differs from that of true spiders, in being more, not less,
-compact: for not only is the head joined to the thorax, but also the
-thorax is joined to the abdomen, the outline of the body being therefore
-almost globular. They receive the name Phalangidæ, Joint-Spiders, from
-the sharp joints in their long legs.
-
-Allied also to the spiders are the Mites, Acarina, so destructive to
-cheese, flour, and other eatables; and the Ticks, which infest the skins
-of various animals Fig. 22 shows a specimen of the latter. They are
-practically blood-sucking Mites. It is the female which attacks animals,
-while the males live among vegetation.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 22.--The Tick which infests the Hippopotamus, from
-South Africa, twice natural size.]
-
-The Scorpions, also, are relatives of the Spiders. They are inhabitants
-of hot countries, and highly venomous. They possess a jointed tail,
-instead of an abdomen with fused segments, and a lobster-like pair of
-appendages in front; these are the second pair of appendages, the
-"pedipalps," while the short "cheliceræ" lie in front. In the living
-animal the tail is often carried curled up over the back. The Mites,
-Ticks, and Scorpions all agree with the true spiders in possessing eight
-legs. The King-Crab, Limulus, has not hitherto been named, because,
-though living in the sea, it is not a crab at all. It has been shown by
-Professor Ray Lankester to be related to the spiders. It is a large
-crab-like creature, which may be seen in museums and aquaria, and is
-brought from the tropical seas.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 23. A Scorpion, _Buthus Kochii_, from India.]
-
-Before passing to consider the true Insects, or Hexapoda, something must
-be said about the discovery of _Peripatus_, a creature which comes from
-Cape Colony. It has been called caterpillar-like in appearance, but its
-structure is in many respects so peculiar, that it has been described as
-a link between insects and the higher worms. Its legs, for instance,
-although jointed, and much resembling those of insects in appearance,
-are hollow, like the "parapodia" of worms.
-
-The Centipedes have been already referred to. These, with the
-Millipedes, form the group Myriapoda. In outward form, at any rate,
-these suggest an intermediate position between Peripatus and Insects.
-
-The true Insects have a definite head, separated from the thorax, and a
-constriction between the thorax and the abdomen; this is why they are
-called insects, "cut in two." The thorax bears three pairs of legs, the
-mouth has typically three pairs of appendages, which may be altered and
-modified in many different ways, according to the nature of the animal's
-way of feeding. While the Crustacea are typically adapted for breathing
-in water by means of their gills, the Insects are adapted for breathing
-air. This they do by means of their air-tubes or tracheæ, the inlets of
-which open on their sides. These are divided into fine branches, which
-diffuse air through the body of the Insect. Two interesting points must
-be noticed about insects. The first is that they were the first group in
-which zoologists were able to study the nature of larval forms, long
-before the microscope had revealed the larval forms of marine animals.
-The changes undergone by insects are known as metamorphosis, or change
-of form; and are typically represented by the life-history of a
-caterpillar, which assumes during the winter a resting form called a
-Chrysalis or Pupa, and finally emerges as a Butterfly. Insects have
-sometimes been classified according to the greater or less completeness
-of the metamorphosis they undergo, which in some cases is comparatively
-slight. It has been mentioned elsewhere that larval forms usually exist
-where the young animal is placed under very different conditions from
-the adult. Fig. 24 shows two well-known instances of insect larvæ in
-which this is strikingly the case, the larval form being a
-water-dweller, and the adult a winged fly. Of these, one, the larvæ of
-the Dragon-fly, crawls about free; while the other, the so-called
-caddis-"worm," builds itself a case of grains of stone and shell
-cemented together.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 24.--Larvæ of insects. _A_, of a Dragon-Fly,
-enlarged; _B_, House of the larva of the Caddis Fly, natural size; _C_,
-the Caddis Larva itself, enlarged.]
-
-The second point of interest is the wonderful part which has been played
-by insects in modifying the world we live in. We owe the bright colours
-and the sweet honey of flowers to the selection exercised by insects;
-they carry the pollen of flowers from one plant to its neighbouring
-kindred, thus securing cross-fertilization for the advantage of the
-plant, and thereby perpetuating any quality, such as colour or
-sweetness, which has originally attracted the insect to the flower.
-While a few plants only are fertilised by means of the wind, a vast
-majority depend entirely upon insects for the cross-fertilisation which
-is so necessary for the production of healthy seeds. We have already
-alluded to the part played by the earthworm in preparing the soil. If
-the earthworm has been the ploughman the insect has been the more
-intelligent gardener, who has filled the world with bright flowers.
-The earlier forms of plant life had green and inconspicuous flowers
-(Cryptogamia); the Phanerogamia, or showy-flowered plants, including all
-those that bear what are popularly termed flowers, have been produced by
-the artificial selection exercised by insects long before man was here
-to admire the result, and to carry on the same work in his gardens. The
-insect owes its food to the plant world; the plant world owes health and
-beauty to the constant ministration of the insect; so marvellous is the
-inter-connexion of one form of life with another.
-
-The number of different kinds of insect is enormous; the number of named
-species has been estimated at nearly a quarter of a million. It is
-therefore no wonder that entomology, the study of insects, has claimed
-the rank of a special science. We cannot here do more than refer in
-passing to a few of the more familiar types. First of all, by right of
-its work in fertilising flowers, let us take the Bee. Fig. 25 shows its
-honeycomb and its larvæ. The bee-grub differs from the caterpillar in
-its comparative helplessness. It is fed like a child by the worker bees,
-which are undeveloped females; and it does not leave the cell in which
-the egg is originally placed until it is ready to take on the adult
-form. The metamorphosis is complete; that is to say there is a grub
-stage and a pupa stage before the adult stage. There are three kinds of
-bees--the workers, which are sexless; the drones, which are males, and
-the queen, who is the sole female of the hive. The bee-grub may develop
-into a worker or a queen, according to the food it receives as a grub,
-the grubs that are intended to become queens being placed in a larger
-cell. The bee-grub differs from the caterpillar in having no feet.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 25.--_A_, Larva of the Bee, _Apis mellifica_; _B_,
-Section of Honeycomb.]
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 26.--Ants, _Formica rufa_, English, enlarged. _A_,
-Female; _B_, Neuter, or Worker.]
-
-The ants are nearly allied to the bees, and also have a complete
-metamorphosis. Fig. 26 shows the English red ant, female and neuter. The
-wings of the female drop off after the pairing season, a fact which has
-given a name, Hymenoptera, to the whole group to which the ant belongs,
-although the name is often quite inapplicable. A recent discovery in
-entomology is the fact that ants have a voice. Dr. D. Sharp of Cambridge
-has described their "stridulating," _i.e._ noise-producing, organs.
-These consist of parallel ridges present on the sides of certain
-segments. By working the body up and down, the insect scrapes these
-ridges with the edge of the preceding segment, so that a musical note is
-produced, intelligible to other ants. The question has also been
-investigated by French observers. The principle involved will readily be
-recognised by those who in childhood were guilty of trying to extract
-music from a comb.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 27.--White Ants, _Eutermes morio_, from Pernambuco,
-twice the natural size. _A_, Soldier; _B_, Worker; _C_, Young male; _D_,
-Female.]
-
-The white ants, so destructive in tropical climates, are not true ants,
-but belong to a different order. These also live in colonies; like the
-bees, they have an egg-laying queen. She has a partner, the king. There
-are neuter soldiers and neuter workers, both wingless, while the male
-and female have wings, afterwards lost.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 28.--Cocoons of Moths. _A_, Compound Cocoon of
-_Coenodomuc hockingi_, from India, one-half natural size; _B_, of a
-Silkworm, _Bombyx Japonica_, one-half natural size; _C_, of Green-shaded
-Honey Moth; _D_, of Death's Head Moth, one-quarter natural size; _E_, of
-_Metura Savendersii_, from New South Wales, natural size; _F_, of
-_Castnia Endesmia_, from Chili, one-sixth of the natural size; _G_,
-of _Attacus attas_ from Bombay, one-fourth of the natural size.]
-
-The Lepidoptera or butterflies and moths receive their name,
-Scaly-winged, from the beautiful microscopic scales with which their
-wings are covered. Fig. 28 shows the cocoons which the larvæ of some of
-the moths make for themselves in which to pass their pupa stage. Some
-are made wholly of silk, others of dried leaves woven together. Fig. 29
-shows a Moth with its caterpillar, cocoon, and chrysalis. The threads of
-which a caterpillar weaves its cocoon are familiarly exemplified in the
-silk of commerce. The caterpillar, in some cases, is gregarious, and
-builds a common nest (Fig. 30).
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 29.--A Moth, _Saturnia pyri_ (S. Europe), with its
-Caterpillar, _A_; its Cocoon, _B_; Cocoon cut open to show Chrysalis,
-_C_; Adult insect, _D_.]
-
-The beetles, Coleoptera, are, like the butterflies, endlessly numerous.
-They are characterised by the striking difference in their two pairs of
-wings, of which the anterior pair is strong and horny, and forms, when
-at rest, a sheath which covers the thinner posterior pair of wings. The
-metamorphosis is complete in this group also. Fig. 31 shows an example
-which is typical except in one respect--the adult form, namely, is one
-of the comparatively few instances of adult insects that live in water.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 30.--Nest of gregarious Caterpillar of a Moth,
-_Hypsoides_.]
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 31.--Development of an English Water-Beetle,
-_Dytiscus_. Grub; Pupa; Adult insect.]
-
-Much has been said above in praise of insects and their wonderful work
-in selecting flowers. There is, however, another side to this, as the
-gardener and farmer know too well. While the winged honey seekers help
-the plants, their larvæ devour them, and so do many other forms of
-insect. Fig. 32 gives us in miniature some of the most notorious insect
-pests. The work of the locust has been dreaded since the days of the
-Pharaohs and before: the Colorado beetle which infests the potato, is a
-plague as terrible, if more modern. The weevils and caterpillars that
-destroy trees, though not directly dangerous to our food supply, are
-sufficiently destructive. The terror of insect pests lies in their vast
-numbers, which may render an otherwise harmless creature dangerous. I
-read last year of a curious railway mishap in the United States. A train
-was brought to a standstill by the wheels sliding on something greasy
-that covered the track. It proved to be a flock of the so-called "Army
-worm," a variety of caterpillar which travels long distances in crowds,
-when its numbers have become too many for the supply of food, or when it
-is about to enter into the pupa stage. These covered the railway track,
-and the whole country for a long distance; and the "greasiness" of
-the rails was produced by the crushed bodies of the unfortunate
-caterpillars. The train was delayed for hours, while a gang of men
-with brooms cleared the way in front of it.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 32. Insect pests. _A_, Locust, _Acridium
-peregrinum_, one-fourth natural size; _B_, Caterpillar of Wood Leopard
-Moth, _Zeutzera Æsculi_, boring in wood, about one-thirtieth of natural
-size; _C_, Colorado Beetle, one-fourth natural size; _D_, Leaf-rolling
-Weevil of the Oak.]
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IX
-
-MOLLUSCA, THE SHELL-FISH
-
-
-The shell-fish are called Mollusca, the soft-bodied animals. It will
-easily be seen that this name was intended to point out the distinction
-between them and the Arthropoda, as regards the way in which the skin is
-protected. In the latter, as we have seen, the skin itself is hardened.
-In the shell-fish, the skin secretes a covering which lies outside it.
-Just as our skins pass out superfluous moisture to the outside, in the
-form of perspiration, so the skin of the mollusc continually passes to
-the outside the solid substances which the body has taken in from the
-sea-water; and by the continual accumulation of these, the shell is
-formed. This, at least, is the view taken by modern authorities of the
-formation of the shell in most instances.
-
-The juvenile shell-collector usually begins his knowledge of the
-classification of the Mollusca, by learning that shells are classified
-as Univalves and Bivalves. This distinction is useful as a beginning.
-Univalves, that is to say shells which consist of one piece, are those
-of the snail-like animals, Gasteropoda, or Gastropoda, as some prefer to
-spell it. Bivalves, or shells which consist of two flaps, are those of
-the Lamellibranchiata or animals with plate-like gills, such as the
-mussel or oyster.
-
-Let us begin with the former. Everybody knows the snail. The snail
-proper bears a typical univalve shell: though in its relatives (the
-slugs), the shell is more or less suppressed. The name, Gasteropoda
-(stomach-footed animals), is supposed to be descriptive of the way in
-which a snail crawls. Half getting out of its shell, so to speak, it
-does its best to lay its body to the ground, and its so-called "foot" is
-an extensive muscular expansion underlying its body, not just a muscular
-organ thrust out of the shell, as in some other groups. The shell, the
-mode of crawling, and the "horns," tipped with eye-specks, and directed,
-intelligently and inquisitively, towards things of interest--these make
-up, for most people, the idea of Snail. But the most distinctive feature
-of the class is a less obvious feature, namely, the structure of the
-tongue. We may see, on any damp day or dewy evening, the snail working
-away with its tongue at some tender leaf. Its tongue is practically a
-file with which it files away the substance of the leaf, the resulting
-green mash being thus made ready in minute quantities for the snail to
-swallow. Thus are made the too familiar holes which disfigure the leaves
-of plants in our garden. When seen under the microscope, the file-like
-structure of the tongue is visible; indeed, in large tongues, it may, to
-some extent, be made out with the naked eye. Across the tongue, which is
-a flat ribbon-like structure, there runs a pattern of small teeth,
-bilaterally symmetrical, and this pattern is repeated over and over
-again throughout the whole length of the tongue. It might be thought
-that snails' tongues, being so much alike in their mode of use, would
-not need to be very various in pattern: but far from this, they vary in
-appearance as much as the shell. Not only is there a different pattern
-for every different order of the class, but a different pattern for
-every genus; nay, there are even distinctions between the tongues of
-different species in the same genus. Consequently some authorities on
-shell-fish prefer to classify them by their tongues, a classification
-which for the most part holds good. So characteristic is the tongue
-of the Gasteropod, that when new animals have turned up which were
-difficult to classify by means of the structure of the body, they have
-been finally recognised as Molluscs, somewhat related to the snails, by
-the tongue. This file-like tongue-ribbon of the snails is often called
-the Odontophore or Tooth-Carrier; sometimes the part which actually
-bears the teeth receives the name of the radula.
-
-The snail and its relative, the slugs, belong to the Pulmonate (_i.e._
-air-breathing) division of the Gasteropoda. The sea-slugs, in which,
-like the land slugs, the shell is absent or reduced, are relatives of
-the land snails. Some of those found on our own shores are handsome
-creatures, brilliantly coloured. Both groups fall under the division
-Euthyneura, while the majority of the marine univalves belong to the
-division Streptoneura (_i.e._ Gasteropods with twisted nerves). The
-Gasteropods, in the course of the evolution of their shell, have had
-the body thrown crooked by the burden of carrying it; the Streptoneura
-are the forms in which this crookedness is most pronounced; in the
-Euthyneura it is less so. There are degrees of crookedness even among
-the Streptoneura; and the limpet is less crooked than the periwinkle
-(see Table, p. 30).
-
-The older classifications of the Gasteropoda were largely founded on the
-characters of the shell; but these, though in the main they hold good,
-have required some modifications in recent times. Conchology, the study
-of shells, was at one time the hobby of many collectors whose knowledge
-of the animals possessing the shells was not of a very extensive kind;
-and consequently the very name of conchology is often enough to ruffle
-the feelings of the zoologist of the present day. Yet many interesting
-problems of variation may be studied from shells alone, by those whose
-circumstances forbid them to study the living animal. Nor is there any
-branch of zoology which is more useful to the teacher who wishes to
-catch the eye and the attention of the beginner in the study of natural
-history, especially if the beginner is young, as beginners ought to
-be. Therefore we must by no means undervalue the past labours of
-conchologists, or the valuable collections which their industry has
-brought together and set in order for the benefit of the world.
-
-For example of the most crooked, or Azygobranchiate division of the
-Streptoneura, turn now to Fig. 33, in which we see a typical Gasteropod
-shell, _Murex ramosus_, the Branchy Murex, aptly enough named from the
-many prickly branches which beset it. These rough points are probably
-assumed for protective purposes; any animal that might wish to dine upon
-the _Murex ramosus_ would think twice before trying to swallow it--the
-morsel of shell-fish is so small, its shelly case so large and so
-prickly. If we look for its nearest English relative, that is _Murex
-erinaceus_, the Hedgehog Murex, or Sting-winkle. This, though a
-comparatively plain shell, has still enough rough ridges upon it to have
-secured it a comparison to the prickly hedgehog. Perhaps the most
-prickly member of the genus, however, is _Murex tenuispina_, sometimes
-called Venus' Comb, because the crowded parallel spines which decorate
-the elongated front of the shell somewhat resemble the parallel teeth of
-a comb.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 33.--The Branchy Murex, _M. ramosus_, a typical
-specimen of the shell of the Carnivorous Gasteropods. _Sp._, spire or
-posterior end of the shell; _S_, siphon or anterior end of the shell.
-Fig. A, shows the mouth of the shell; Fig. B, the exterior only. Less
-than one-half the natural size.]
-
-How does the _Murex_ get its living? Let us notice the shape of the
-shell, drawn out to a point, at the end opposite to the spire. According
-to the older classification of the Mollusca, now somewhat fallen out of
-use, this point marks the shell as belonging to one of the
-Siphonostomata (shell-fish with a siphon at the mouth of the shell,
-_i.e._). These shell-fish are, with few exceptions, carnivorous; not
-that the siphon shape of the shell has any direct connection with the
-animal's way of feeding. Just as the snail files among soft vegetable
-substances, so the Murex and many of its relations file away much
-harder things. A Sting-winkle, or a Dog-whelk, can sit down over a
-helpless bivalve shell-fish, and patiently file away, until it has
-worked a neat round hole in the protecting shell of the latter. You may
-find, among the dead shells on any sandy part of the English coast, any
-number of bivalve half-shells with a neat little round hole in them,
-indicating unmistakeably how the tenant came to its death. There is some
-controversy as to the spot chosen by the assailant for its attack. Some
-authorities have stated that the predatory mollusc is so wise that it
-knows where to find a weak spot, and makes a hole just over some vital
-organ of the bivalve, or else above its adductor muscles, so that, when
-these are cut, the half-shells cannot be drawn tightly together and kept
-shut. Recently this has been denied, and statistics of the attacks of
-_Purpura_, the common small whelk, a relation of the _Murex_, on
-_Mytilus edulis_, the Common Mussel, have shown that the perforation
-occurs in every part of the shell. It is possible, however, that the
-Mussel, from the peculiar shape of its shell, offers an exceptional
-case; and I am inclined to think that in the case of bivalves of a more
-flattened shape, the earlier statement holds true. At South Shields,
-England, perforated half-shells of the Common _Venus_ (Fig. 34) are so
-abundant that the children string them for necklaces; yet I have never
-been able, by the most industrious search, to find more than one or two
-specimens in which the hole is at all near the lip of the shell. It is
-possible that these exceptional instances were the work of a young and
-inexperienced univalve mollusc, or a stupid one. It is possible, also,
-that the mode of attack differs somewhat according to the species of
-the assailant. (It should perhaps be explained, for the benefit of those
-who have no experience in the ways of children or of shell necklaces,
-that the hole must be moderately near the beak of the shell, to enable
-the shell to "sit" properly on a string. Every unit in the necklace may
-therefore be counted as one in favour of the older theory.) Many of the
-Siphonostomatous molluscs are surprisingly active and strong, so that
-they are well fitted for a predatory existence. In fact, they not only
-eat bivalves, but occasionally attack the vegetable-feeding univalves
-when nothing better is to be got, so that occasionally the shells of
-these also may be found displaying the deadly little round hole we have
-described.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 34.--Half Shells of the Common Venus, several of
-them perforated by carnivorous molluscs. From South Shields, England.]
-
-Let us contrast with the _Murex_ one of the shells which are
-"holostomatous," _i.e._ possessing an unindented shell-mouth--that is to
-say, one without a "siphon." The common edible periwinkle, _Littorina
-littorea_, may be taken as an example. No shell is more familiar; even
-the town-dweller, who has never found it on the sea-shore, has seen it
-often on stalls in the slums. The mouth of the shell is quite round and
-unindented, and in this case the character holds good as the mark of a
-vegetable-feeder--a non-predatory sea-snail. It is hardly necessary to
-remind the reader that its name (the shore-shell) is given it because it
-lives where the tide leaves the rocks exposed during part of the day.
-Another common species of _Littorina_, which frequently lives a little
-lower down, where the large sea-weeds grow, has been described in
-Chapter II.; and another, _L. rudis_, lives a little higher up, so that
-it spends most of its time in a dry state, and is fast on its way to
-become a land-shell. At most of the familiar English seaside resorts one
-may see dozens of it baking in a hot July sun on rocks where only the
-highest tides can reach them: and yet under these conditions they
-continue to live and flourish. The periwinkles are remarkable for the
-great length of the tooth-ribbon, in comparison with the size of the
-animal. The number of separate teeth upon it has been estimated at 3500.
-
-A familiar feature of the common periwinkle is the lid or stopper
-(Operculum), with which the animal can close the mouth of the shell.
-This is developed and carried by the outside of the animal's foot. In
-the periwinkle and other English molluscs it is comparatively soft and
-semi-transparent, and reminds one of a thin slice of horn. In many
-tropical molluscs, however, it is hard and shelly. The large tropical
-shells named _Turbo_ have massive lids of considerable weight. These
-shells, which are nearly allied to the pearly Top-shells (_Trochus_) of
-the English shores, are sold as ornaments, the outer coat of the shell
-being partly scraped off to show the inner coat of pearl: it is rarely,
-however, that the purchaser obtains a lid, or even knows that the
-creature had one. The reverse is the case with some of the smaller
-kinds, the lids of which, being brightly coloured, are imported without
-the shell, and sometimes set as articles of jewellery. Some of these are
-of a bright green hue.
-
-While the lids of the Holostomata are rounded in shape, those that
-belong to the Siphonostomatous shells are necessarily more or less
-modified so as to fit the mouth of the shell, and are consequently oval
-or even claw-like in shape. The Sting-winkle already spoken of, the
-common small whelk, _Purpura lapillus_, and the large whelk, _Buccinum
-undatum_, are common shell-fish in which the elongated lid may be
-studied. The lid is not, however, like the tongue-ribbon, an essential
-feature of the structure of every univalve mollusc.[D] Not only are
-there special instances in which it is greatly modified, but also
-there are whole groups of univalve molluscs in which it is absent.
-
-[D] There are one or two exceptional cases of gasteropod molluscs that
-have no tongue-ribbon. The majority of these are parasitic forms, which
-can get their food without the trouble of filing it down.
-
-A curious suggestion has been made with regard to the lids of univalve
-shell-fish; namely, that the snapping to of the lid is capable of
-producing a sound, which may perhaps be audible at a distance under the
-water. Various molluscs have been credited with producing sounds, either
-by muscular movements or by the grating of the shell as the animal
-walks. The common Tortoise-shell Snail, _Helix aspersa_, sometimes
-makes a most alarming noise when crawling over a window. It has been
-disputed whether the sounds thus made are produced by the grating of the
-creature's tongue-ribbon on the glass, as it files off small particles
-of algae and vegetable moulds, which are invisible to our eyes: or
-whether they are sounds due to suction of the muscular surfaces, such as
-may be produced by drawing a wet finger across glass. The noise, however
-produced, is, as I can testify from experience, sufficiently loud and
-weird to be very startling, if heard in the dead of night.
-
-Turn now to the Bivalves or Lamellibranchiate molluscs, which include
-the familiar oyster, cockle, and mussel. These are also known as the
-Pelecypoda, and as the Aglossa, or molluscs without a tongue-ribbon. The
-name Lamellibranchiate refers to the shape of the gills--"plate-like,"
-or flat; the name Pelecypoda to the shape of the foot, "hatchet-foot."
-
-The animal usually chosen as a type of these, the fresh-water mussel, is
-rather a dull sort of creature, so we have chosen a prettier and more
-lively specimen as a representative of the class; namely, one of the
-Scallops, _Pecten opercularis_, sometimes called the Quin, the shell of
-which is shown in the frontispiece of the book. This is one of the most
-beautiful, perhaps the most beautiful, of the English shells. The
-generic name, _Pecten_, the Comb-shell, probably refers, not to the
-shape of the gills, which is somewhat peculiar, but to the marking of
-the shell, which presents raised ridges, side by side. Anyone familiar
-with shells will see at once that this is an unusual pattern. There are
-plenty of bivalve shells with concentric ridge markings, comparatively
-few with radiating ridges. We shall see presently that there is a good
-reason for this. The specific name "opercularis," lid-like, refers to
-the neat round shape of the shell. Each half of the shell has a pair of
-"ears," so-called. The person who first gave this name to these flaps of
-shell, three of which are three-cornered and the fourth nondescript,
-must have been familiar in his youth with books afflicted with the
-"dog's-ear" disfigurement; for certainly there is no other kind of ear
-which greatly resembles these. The notch beneath the irregularly shaped
-ear is called the "byssal notch": many Pectens spin a byssus or thread,
-like that spun by the common Sea-Mussel, and thus anchor themselves to
-fixed objects for a time; this notch is the place where threads of this
-kind leave the shell.
-
-The two valves of the shell differ in depth, one being flatter than the
-other; and the "ears" of the two valves differ in shape. The inside of
-the shell shows muscular impressions, but these cannot be seen in a
-photograph. The picture, however, shows the strong hinge-ligament which
-joins the halves of the shell, and the difference in depth and shape of
-the two valves. The valve on which the animal usually lies is the
-lighter in colour of the two, and has one ear much longer than the
-other.
-
-The creature swims by means of the "mantle," or muscular margin of the
-body. It contracts this suddenly, after first opening the shell and
-taking in as much water as possible. Thus the water is squeezed out
-again, and the effect of this is to propel the animal in an opposite
-direction.
-
-Now we are in a position to understand a little more about the shape of
-the shell. These curious "ears" possessed by the two valves, together
-form a straight, strong edge, which cuts the water as the animal flies
-along. It reminds us of a ship's prow, and not without reason, for the
-use of each is the same. A boat's sharp prow, compared with the rounded
-front of a "tub," makes all the difference in the possibilities of
-straight steering, and favours the putting on of speed: the ears of the
-shell are not less useful to our Scallop. The following account of the
-swimming powers of this species of Scallop, quoted by Woodward, was
-given by the Rev. D. Landsborough, who observed young specimens, about
-the size of the small ones in our picture, swimming about in a pool of
-sea-water, left by the ebbing tide. "Their motion was rapid and zigzag;
-they seemed, by the sudden opening and shutting of their valves, to have
-the power of darting like an arrow through the water. One jerk carried
-them some yards, and then by another sudden jerk they were off in a
-moment on a different tack." To the sharp prow, the _Pecten_ owes this
-capability of arrow-like flight. Its eyes are situated on the fringe of
-its mantle, and consequently near the wide end of the shell; its
-peculiar mode of progression, therefore, enables it to back away
-instantly from any enemy it sees.
-
-Something must be said regarding the interior of the shell. The majority
-of bivalve shells have a complicated system of so-called "teeth," or
-interlocking projections, at the hinges of the shell: these exhibit
-great variety in different kinds of shell, and are therefore often a
-ready means of distinguishing one shell from another. The Scallop,
-however, is very deficient in this respect, as are also some of its near
-relations, for instance the oyster and its family group. The Fresh-water
-Mussel also gains its name, _Anodon_, or _Anodonta_, the Toothless One,
-from the same circumstance. The name often puzzles the beginner, who
-asks, bewildered, "But do Bivalves ever have any teeth?" True teeth, of
-course, they have none--it is the shell-hinge that has teeth, not the
-animal inside it. Not only have the bivalve shell-fish no teeth indeed,
-or tongue-ribbon, but furthermore they have no head. For this reason the
-group has not only received the name already mentioned, of Aglossa, the
-Tongue-less Ones, but also that of Lipocephala, _i.e._ Molluscs in which
-the head is not developed. The reason of its absence is not far to
-seek--a head would be no use inside such a shell. The snail-shell, so
-differently built, allows freedom for the head; the bivalve mollusc,
-squeezed in between its valves, has room only for a mouth.
-
-We have referred above to the ridges on the outside of the shell. Now
-that we have learnt that the _Pecten_ is a very active animal, and moves
-in the manner described, we see that these ridges run parallel to the
-direction in which it moves as it darts away ears foremost. Let us try
-to realise what is the effect of this.
-
-Take a mat with parallel stripes and move it along the floor or table
-in the direction of the stripes; then try moving it in an opposite
-direction across the stripes. It is easy to perceive that in the former
-case one's eye does not detect the movement nearly so soon as in the
-latter case. To explain this would necessitate a lengthy digression on
-the subject of optical illusions: that the fact is so everyone may
-easily ascertain by experiment. The ridges, therefore, converging in the
-direction towards which the shell is going, are a protective decoration,
-enabling it to slip away more easily from under the eyes of its foes.
-The reader will readily recall a parallel instance in the common Cockle.
-This also is a very active creature; it takes leaps by means of a strong
-muscular foot; and the ridges on the shell, like those of the Scallop,
-converge towards the hinges, that is to say, in the direction in which
-the shell moves. Another instance of a very active shell-fish with
-similar markings is afforded by certain kinds of Lima, a near relative
-of the Scallops. It may be added that all Scallops are not equally
-active, nor all Limas; and various modifications of their form and
-colour might be pointed out which lead us to suspect that in the less
-active kinds the pattern of ridges is often somewhat obscured by means
-of these differences.
-
-Now, take up a comb and draw it over your fingers, firstly _along_ the
-teeth, and secondly _across_ them, and you will be able to estimate the
-gain in speed and comfort to the comb-shell, Pecten, and to the common
-Cockle, from having its ridges set in the direction in which it is
-going. Were the ridges concentric, as is so often the case in bivalve
-shell-fish of a more sluggish disposition, the friction caused by the
-ridges would seriously delay the progress of the shell.
-
-Something must be added regarding the colouring of the shell, which is
-vivid, corresponding with that of the animal within. It is capable of
-great variety, though perhaps not so great as in some of the smaller
-_Pectens_. The predominant shades are pink, crimson and yellow, either
-separately or mixed; that is to say, some shells are pure pink, some
-almost pure yellow, some almost pure crimson, while others present every
-imaginable shade of pinkish yellow, reddish brown and brownish crimson.
-Local variation of colour is so marked that we may suspect the
-variations in tint to be in some degree protective. The shell also
-varies considerably in size and strength according to the neighbourhood
-in which it has grown.
-
-This scallop-shell is but one of many: a number of other species are
-found on our own shores, and many others again in foreign seas.
-
-One shell of the English coast is very annoying to the juvenile
-shell-collector who gathers specimens on the shore. This is _Pecten
-pusio_, a very small and delicate kind, with a raised pattern of fine
-markings upon the ridges, which are very narrow. A good specimen of the
-deeper valve is common enough, but the shallow valve, if of any size, is
-distorted into all manner of shapes, as if it had been squeezed and
-crumpled. The disappointing character of these specimens, from an
-æsthetic point of view, is explained when we learn that it not only lies
-on its shallow valve, but becomes fixed in this position, instead of
-hopping about freely like the _P. opercularis_. It therefore has
-frequently to adapt its shape to the nature of the ground where it has
-happened to fix itself. Thus arises the disfigurement of the shell.
-
-So far we have only considered two great groups of the Mollusca, two
-which are represented by common shells, familiar to everybody. We must
-not leave the subject of the Mollusca without referring to their most
-aristocratic group, the Cephalopoda. These are represented in museums by
-the shells of the Pearly Nautilus, and of its not very near relative,
-the Paper Nautilus; and they are represented on English shores by the
-cuttle-fishes. All these agree with the Gasteropoda in the possession of
-a tongue-ribbon, and in classification are therefore treated with them
-under the name Glossophora.
-
-With the Pteropods, transparent forms found swimming over the surface
-of the deep sea, the reader is not likely to have much to do. In
-classification they are now placed near the Sea-Slugs.
-
-The Placophora, or Polyplacophora, wholly different from our usual idea
-of a shell-fish, may be named as creatures which the reader is quite
-likely to meet with. Though not very common, they are widely distributed
-over our coasts, and may be found near low-tide mark clinging to stones.
-Imagine a wood-louse without any apparent head which has taken to
-clinging to the rock like a limpet, so that it cannot be removed without
-injury, and you have a rough idea of their general appearance. _Chiton_
-is the name of these animals, which have received the group name of
-Polyplacophora, carriers of many plates, because their external covering
-consists of an armour of successive shelly plates. These also belong to
-the Glossophora or Tongue-ribbon Carriers, of which they present a
-comparatively primitive form.
-
-Reference has already been made to the labours of the earthworm and of
-the insects, and to their important effects upon the vegetable world.
-Although the Mollusca include but one terrestrial group, the Snails,
-they, too, have played an appreciable part in modifying plant life. If
-we owe our flowers to the insects, we have probably to thank the snail
-for our medicines. For the snail dislikes bitter-tasting leaves, and
-lets them alone, thus exercising an artificial selection in favour of
-the survival of medicinal plants. In the same way the snail has favoured
-the survival of hairy and thorny plants, upon which it cannot easily
-crawl.
-
-The larval forms of the Mollusca differ considerably from the adult.
-That of _Anodon_, the fresh-water mussel, at first received, in
-consequence, a different name, that of Glochidium, by which it is still
-known, although it has now been long identified as a larval form. It is
-exceptional in the fact that it is parasitic on fish.
-
-The usual Molluscan larva is a ciliated creature which has been compared
-to a modified trochosphere. It is preceded by a gastrula stage, and it
-develops later on into what is called a "Veliger," or "veil-carrying"
-larva, so called because it has in front a broad two-lobed ciliated
-expansion, the velum. This larva is adapted for swimming, which is
-accomplished by means of the velum. In terrestrial molluscs, the
-development is necessarily much more direct. It is worthy of note that
-the periwinkle mentioned above, which lives high and dry (_L. rudis_)
-has no larval form, while its relatives that live under water develop
-in the usual way.
-
-The eggs of Mollusca are often enclosed in tough cases, calculated to
-resist waves and weather. Some of these are shown in miniature, in the
-group of eggs of various kinds, Fig. 35.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 35.--Eggs (reduced to half the natural size).
-_A_, Egg-Capsules of _Murex_. _B_, Frog's Eggs. _C_, Eggs of large
-Land-snail. _D_, Eggs of Snail placed on a leaf. _E_, Cockchafer's Eggs.
-_F_, Egg-case of Cockroach. _G_, Egg-cases of Locust. _H_, _I_, _J_,
-Eggs of Gasteropod Molluscs. _H_, _Sycotypus_ (_Pyrula_). _J_,
-_Fusus_.]
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE MOLLUSCA
-
- { AGLOSSA: the LAMELLIBRANCHIATA, also called
- { CONCHIFERA, and PELECYPODA.
- =MOLLUSCA.= {
- {
- { GLOSSOPHORA { GASTEROPODA.
- { CEPHALOPODA.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER X
-
-THE BRACHIOPODA OR LAMP-SHELLS
-
-
-These were at one time included under the Mollusca, on account of
-their possession of a bivalve shell. This shell, however, is placed
-practically back and front of the animal, not to the right and left of
-it, as is the case with the shells of the bivalve Mollusca.
-
-The name, arm-footed, was given them in reference to a pair of special
-structures called the arms, bearing a large number of tentacles; it is
-now more frequently spoken of as the lophophore (see p. 122), and
-regarded as comparable to the lophophore of the Polyzoa, spread out into
-two portions. With the latter group the Brachiopods were formerly united
-by Huxley, under the name of Molluscoidea. This name is now obsolete,
-because it is understood that all these creatures are widely different
-from Molluscs; but the theory of relationship of the Brachiopoda to the
-Polyzoa, implied in it, still holds good.
-
-The chief importance of this group lies in its fossil forms, which are
-exceedingly numerous, particularly in the Mountain Limestone of the
-Carboniferous Period; it is crowded with their shells, especially a form
-named, from its elongated shape, Productus. The shells of Brachiopods
-are equal-sided; that is to say, the right and left valves match; but
-they are inequivalve, the ventral valve being much the biggest. It often
-contains a foramen, or hole, at the beak, for the passage of the
-pedicle, or stalk, by which the animal is attached to the ground (_e.g._
-_Terebratula_, _Rhynchonella_). Sometimes, however, the pedicle passes
-out between the valves (_Lingula_, _e.g._), in which case there is no
-foramen; or it may be arranged in other ways. Sometimes the shell is
-merely attached to the ground by its side, like an oyster. Some forms
-are enormously widened in a lateral direction, _e.g._ _Spirifera_, and
-the _Productus_ above named. _Lingula_, among others, is remarkable as
-being a form that has survived from the earliest geological period to
-the present day.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE BRACHIOPODA
-
- { TESTICARDINIS.--Shell Calcareous, with hinges.
- { Skeleton present in the arms.
- =BRACHIOPODA.= {
- { ECARDINES.--Shell comparatively soft, composed
- { of Chitin, only strengthened by deposits
- { of lime, without hinges. No skeleton in
- { the arms.
-
-The larva, in its best known forms, passes through the typical larval
-stages of the animal kingdom. It is first a one-layered larva, then a
-two-layered form, and then becomes a ciliated animal. In this three
-regions may be distinguished, representing respectively the head, body,
-and pedicle.
-
-The shells of the Brachiopoda, including the kinds above named, may be
-seen by the reader in any geological museum.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XI
-
-THE POLYZOA; MOSS-CORALS AND SEA-MATS
-
-
-We have already described the creatures which are popularly known
-as Corallines. Modern zoologists have long separated off from the
-Corallines of the older writers, a group of animals known as the
-Sea-Mats, which also are colonies made up of unit individuals. The
-common Sea-Mat, _Flustra foliacea_, may be picked up on almost any part
-of the English coast, being often torn up "by the roots" and washed in
-by the tide. When fresh it has a pleasant scent, which has been compared
-to that of Lemon Verbena, and a pinkish colour, due to the presence of
-the little inhabitants in their cells. When dry it has no odour,
-the cells are empty, and the colour a pale drab like that of a dead
-Coralline. Its texture is, however, much more crisp and brittle, and
-less horny, than that of a dead Coralline: it grows in flat, forked
-expansions, much resembling in outline the fronds of several common
-seaweeds; and each side of these is covered with a diamond pattern of
-little cells. This crowded arrangement of the cells, with a tendency to
-assume a geometrical pattern, is the readiest feature by which the
-beginner may distinguish a Sea-Mat from a Coralline. The latter arrange
-their cells in a free-growing, tree-like or fernlike form, without any
-crowding of the units into a geometrical pattern. The division of the
-flat leaf-like colony by two, resulting in bifurcated branches, is
-another obvious feature of the Sea-Mat.
-
-Covering--and to the botanist's eye disfiguring--the branches of many
-sea-weeds, and growing upon oyster-shells, tangle-roots, and other fixed
-objects, we may find many little incrustations which remind us of the
-lichens of the land: the diamond pattern of little cells shows us,
-however, that these things are relations of the Sea-Mats. The name of
-Bryozoa, Moss-Corals, was formerly given to these growths. Many of
-them bear long hair-like processes at regular intervals; these, which
-are large enough to be plainly seen with the naked eye, afford a ready
-means of recognising these creatures.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE POLYZOA
-
- { ECTOPROCTA, with excretory aperture outside
- { the ring of tentacles, _e.g._, _Flustra_.
- =POLYZOA.= {
- { ENDOPROCTA with excretory aperture inside
- { the ring of tentacles.
-
-The Polyzoa include freshwater as well as marine forms. They have a
-free-swimming larva, which becomes fixed after a time, and gives rise
-to the adult Colonial forms. The zooids of the latter have each an
-independent head with a crown of tentacles, called the Lophophore
-(Crest-carrier); but the fixed ends of their bodies communicate with one
-another. The hard covering of the colony, which retains its form after
-the animal is dead, is a kind of hardened skin: the apparent "cells" are
-the openings through which the individual zooids protrude themselves.
-Sometimes certain of the zooids undergo modification for special
-purposes: in this way are formed the "avicularia," snapping appendages,
-probably defensive in purpose, so called because they open and shut like
-a bird's beak. There are two divisions of the Polyzoa, the Ectoprocta
-and the Endoprocta. Among the latter there is found a form which is not
-colonial.
-
-_Phoronis_, a curious worm-like animal, which has a larval form called
-_Actinotrocha_ is sometimes placed in classification near the Polyzoa,
-which it resembles in possessing a crown of tentacles (Lophophore).
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XII
-
-THE ECHINODERMATA
-
-
-Everybody knows the Star-fish and many people know the Sea-Urchin.
-An "urchin" is not a name for a naughty little boy, but the French
-(_oursin_) for a hedgehog. A Sea-Urchin is therefore a "Sea-Hedgehog,"
-a name very appropriate for a creature armed with prickles. The Greek
-word _echinos_ also means a hedgehog, so that the long name given to the
-group means simply hedgehog-skinned. The prickles attain their maximum
-in the Sea-Urchin, but they are well represented in the Star-fish, while
-in the Sea-cucumber the general tendency to "prickliness" is much
-reduced, and represented only by "spicules" (needles) of shelly stuff
-underneath the skin of the animal.
-
-The largest and the most beautiful of the Sea-Urchins of the English
-coast is known as the Purple-tipped Sea-Urchin, on account of the
-beautiful colour of the spines. It lives on rocky coasts, and during
-very low tides may be seen at home, although it usually takes care not
-to stray above the water-line. It is a shelly ball with a flat base; its
-surface is covered with long spines. Its mouth, which is in the centre
-of the base, shows five wicked-looking teeth peeping out. The shell is
-pierced by what look like hundreds of minute pin-holes, arranged in a
-complicated pattern; these are the holes through which it pokes its
-feet, which greatly resemble those of a Star-fish, being white suckers
-with a disc at the end. When thrown out to their full length they are,
-however, much longer than those of the Starfish, for they are naturally
-obliged to be thrown out to a distance longer than the length of the
-animal's own prickles. When moored by all its feet, extended from all
-sides of the shelly ball, the animal presents a curious and pretty
-sight. Large specimens are almost as big as a child's head, but smaller
-ones are more common. There is a considerable range of variation
-in colour; not only are various shades of purple found, but also
-purplish-red and red. The spines are mounted on something resembling a
-ball and socket joint, with a ring-shaped pad, so that they have a wide
-range of movement; if any of the spines are touched they are immediately
-set back over a considerable part of the neighbouring surface.
-
-Other kinds may be found upon a more sandy shore. These are heart-shaped
-and much lighter in colour. The shell is thinner and of less weight.
-These adaptations for lessening the animal's weight enable it to move
-over sand: the species above described has no occasion for such
-precautions. When it crawls over rocks and the strong seaweeds that grow
-on them, there is no fear of its sinking in. The sand-dweller, on the
-contrary, must take care that it is not swallowed up.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 36.--The Five-holed Sand Cake, _Mellita pentapora_,
-a flat sea-urchin from the east coast of tropical North America. _A_,
-upper surface; =B=, lower surface; _C_, side view.]
-
-There are Sea-Urchins that carry their precautions against sinking to an
-extreme degree. These are the Shield-Urchins or Clypeastridæ, so-called
-from their flat shape; they include the American forms popularly known
-as "sand-cakes." The diagram (Fig. 36) shows one of the most curious of
-these flattened forms adapted for moving over fine sand and ooze, and
-literally "as flat as a pancake." The mouth is approximately in the
-centre of the lower surface, _B_; the upper surface, _A_, shows a
-rosette pattern on the top of the shell. This is formed by the rows of
-holes for the very minute tube feet. In the English Sea-Urchin above
-described, which is one of the group called (for that reason) Regulares,
-the rows of holes are uniformly continued all along the rounded sides of
-the body down to the neighbourhood of the mouth. Here they are much
-restricted, forming merely a rosette at the top of the shell: hence
-they are described as circumscript or "petaloid." The excretory aperture
-is shown in the photograph as a smaller dot on one side of the mouth,
-while in the Echinus, on the contrary, it is at the top of the shell.
-The five odd-looking, elongated holes are a curious individual
-peculiarity of this Sea-Urchin. It has already been explained that the
-Shield-Urchins are flattened in order to distribute their weight; these
-holes are a contrivance for still further reducing the weight in
-comparison with the area. This is when the animal is lying quiet at the
-bottom of the water, but when it moves about what effect will the
-presence of the holes produce? Flattened animals are usually supposed
-to derive an advantage from the fact that they sink more slowly
-through depths of water; as in lying upon the ground, their weight is
-distributed, and they float, as it were, in the same stratum of water
-without sinking further down. This creature, on the contrary, has
-apparently feared lest it should move too slowly when it moves in a
-vertical direction, and it presents us with an arrangement by means of
-which its sinking through water is facilitated. Water will pass readily
-through the five holes as the animal goes either up or down, and the
-resistance of the whole flat area to the water is thus reduced and
-vertical movement rendered more easy. Thus, by one and the same
-contrivance, the animal has lessened its weight when lying quiet, and
-diminished the resistance it meets with when it moves. The distribution
-of the holes, moreover, is such as to regulate the animal's position in
-sinking, and to prevent it from falling "headlong." For although the
-creature has, strictly speaking, no "head," yet the end nearest the
-mouth is the thickest and heaviest part of the "cake," and would
-naturally tend downwards. This tendency is counteracted by the fact that
-the thicker end is unperforated, while the thinner and lighter end has a
-large central hole to diminish its resistance and enable it to sink more
-rapidly.
-
-Adapted for living in sand rather than on rocks, but not so extreme
-in the peculiarity of their form as the Shield-Urchins, are the
-Heart-Urchins, already referred to, shaggy-looking creatures whose fine
-yellowish-white spines give them almost the appearance of being clothed
-with fur. The excretory aperture is at the narrow end of the "heart,"
-and the mouth at one side of the lower surface towards the wide end. The
-complicated apparatus of teeth found in other Sea-Urchins is absent in
-these. They are abundant on sandy shores. During the severe winter of
-1894-5, when the Mersey at Liverpool was frozen nearly for one memorable
-day, and filled with floating ice for many more, I saw the shore beyond
-New Brighton heaped all along with a bank, often two feet across, of the
-common Heart-Urchin. These, which afforded a fine feast for the hungry
-sea-gulls, had been killed by the intense cold, and afterwards washed
-ashore by the tide. The vast numbers of this creature which exist on
-that coast were thus unexpectedly brought to light.
-
-These animals are sometimes described as "burrowing" creatures, because
-they live covered in sand. The term is rather misleading. Far from
-wishing to burrow, they spend their lives in a constant struggle with
-sand that closes over them only too readily; and their whole structure
-is adapted to prevent their sinking in a quick-sand.
-
-We began our chapter with the Sea-Urchins, because they are the most
-important members of the group to which they give their name; but there
-are forms belonging to the Echinodermata that are more familiar to the
-ordinary observer--the Starfishes. Those who take an interest in the
-cultivation of the oyster find them far too familiar--for the starfish
-is the oyster's deadliest foe, not even excepting man.
-
-The common Starfish, _Asterias rubens_, may constantly be found among
-stones, about low-tide mark. Its manner of walking is peculiar and
-characteristic. On the under surface of each ray are rows of white
-sucker-like tube-feet, which can either be drawn in or pushed out. By
-doing each alternately the animal walks. First the feet are extended to
-their full length; then the terminal sucking disc of each catches hold
-of the ground. Then the feet are again retracted, while their discs
-still cling; the effect of this is, naturally, to pull the ray onwards.
-This process is repeated again and again, until some appreciable degree
-of movement is effected. The tube-feet are in connection with a system
-of vessels filled with fluid, known as the Water-vascular System of the
-Starfish. The fluid is driven on by muscular contractions until the feet
-are fully extended, and again driven back when the feet are retracted.
-The Water-vascular System is a structure common to all Echinoderms; and
-vessels of a comparable character are found in some worms.
-
-How does the Starfish know where it is going? Underneath each ray, near
-the tip, is a little feeler (or tentacle) and a little eye spot. By
-means of these it gets an idea where each ray is going to; and, since it
-often moves but one ray at a time, this is sufficient for it. When
-necessary, however, the several rays can act in concert with one
-another.
-
-The rayed form of the Starfishes led to their being at first included
-in the group of Radiate Animals, along with the tentacle-bearing
-Coelenterata; but it has long been recognised that they are animals of
-much higher structure. Their very larvæ can barely be brought into
-comparison with animals so simple as the true "radiates."
-
-The Snake-Stars, or Ophiuroidea, are closely allied to the Starfishes.
-In these the arms are thin and sharply defined from the little central
-disc, instead of sloping gently out of it, as in the Starfishes. The
-rapid wriggling movements of the arms have gained for them their very
-appropriate name. They are also called Brittle Stars, because the arms
-break off easily, sometimes at the will of the animal. Several kinds of
-them are common on our shores, although they are not so common as the
-ordinary Starfishes. Fig. 37 shows the general form of a Brittle Star.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 37.--A Brittle-Star, _Ophiopteris antipodum_.]
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 38. A Sea-Cucumber, _Cucumaria Planci_, from Naples,
-natural size.]
-
-The Sea-Cucumbers, Holothuroidea, are another group of Echinodermata
-that are represented on our own coasts; by small specimens, however,
-while the Pacific Ocean furnishes instances of larger size--the
-Trepangs--which are used by the Chinese as articles of food. The name
-Sea-Cucumber is given in fanciful comparison to a small Gherkin;
-presumably one that has been very badly pickled--for the colour of the
-animal is brownish and by no means green. The mouth of a Sea-Cucumber is
-surrounded by a circlet of tentacles (partially indicated in the
-diagram, Fig. 38). The body is elongated and crawls along: the "star"
-shape, so characteristic of the Echinoderms, is scarcely to be
-recognised except in cross section, where the longitudinal rows
-of tube-feet are seen to outline a pentagon. The skeleton of the
-Sea-Cucumber is of a very meagre description. Instead of forming a
-rounded case, as in the Sea-Urchin, it consists only of loose pieces
-of very small size, situated below the skin. The Starfishes are
-intermediate in this respect. Their "skeleton" consists of a vast number
-of pieces or "ossicles," which are of fair size, but are not closely
-united, as in the Sea-Urchin. They are, however, so numerous and so well
-knit, that the skeleton of a dead Starfish presents the complete outward
-form of the animal. It must be noted that the ordinary skeleton of the
-Sea-Urchin is only _apparently_ exterior. As is the case with the
-ossicles of the Starfish and Sea-Cucumber, the skin lies outside, and
-the hard particles belong to the middle layer, or mesoderm. In this the
-skeleton of Echinoderms differs from the "shell" of a crab or lobster,
-which is formed by a hardening of the skin itself.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 39.--_A_, Head of a Stone Lily or Encrinite,
-_Encrinus liliformis_, a fossil from the Muschelkalk of Brunswick,
-natural size. _B_, Rock with stalks of encrinites. _C_, Section of a
-stalk.]
-
-The Crinoidea, Encrinites or Stone-Lilies, form another group of the
-Echinodermata. Though still represented by living forms, they attained
-their maximum development in past ages. The English "Mountain Limestone"
-of the Carboniferous period is full of their fossilized remains, which
-form a marble often used for ornamental purposes. The so-called "Stone
-Lily" consists of a "head" comparable with the body of a Star-fish or
-other Echinoderm, which is borne at the end of a long fixed stalk. The
-marble above named owes its ornamental appearance to the presence of
-these stalks, often very long, and cut through at every possible angle.
-The Crinoids have their living representative in English Seas,
-_Antedon_, the Feather-Star (Fig. 40). On the side opposite the mouth,
-where, in the Encrinite, the stalk would be, there are a group of
-elongated processes called cirrhi, by means of which the animal can
-attach itself to stones or seaweeds. When not thus fixed, it swims
-about, by moving its fringed arms, each of which is forked. It will be
-seen that when the animal is fixed by its cirrhi, it stands mouth
-upwards, so that its position compared with that of the Starfish or
-Sea-Urchin is upside down. The young of the Feather-Stars have stalks by
-which they are fixed, like the Encrinites; but afterwards the stalk is
-lost.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 40.--A Feather-Star, _Antedon bifida_, British Seas,
-three-quarters of the natural size. The short threads in the middle are
-the cirrhi.]
-
-Among fossil Echinoderms there are two groups of stalked forms which
-have no living representatives. These are the Cystoidea and the
-Blastoidea. In both of these the stalk bears, as in Encrinites, a calyx
-or head, which is comparable, with the body of the free Echinoderms.
-
-The Sea-Urchins possess a swimming larval stage, which goes through
-remarkable changes after passing out of the two-layered (Gastrula)
-form. It becomes provided with cilia, which are arranged in bands,
-and outgrowths of peculiar form are established in the case of the
-Sea-Urchins, while the larvæ of the other groups also present
-characteristic shapes. Within the larva the adult form develops, the
-outside of the larva being finally thrown off.
-
-In the young Feather-Star, a subsequent stage of the young animal has a
-stalk, by which, like the Encrinite, it is fixed. This animal therefore
-is at first free-swimming, afterwards fixed, and again free in its final
-stage--a remarkable series of changes.
-
-These queer-shaped things, the Sea-Urchins and their allies, are perhaps
-the last creatures amongst which we should think of looking for
-relations of the Worms. Yet the earliest stages of the larva are
-considered to present a certain amount of resemblance to the Wheel-ball
-larva, which has been referred to elsewhere (pp. 42 and 72). Still more
-startling fact, these larvæ have been compared to that of
-_Balanoglossus_, the lowest member of the Chordata, and a relation of
-the Vertebrates themselves (see p. 143).
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE ECHINODERMATA
-
- { ECHINOIDEA, OR SEA-URCHINS.
- { ASTEROIDEA, OR STAR-FISHES.
- =ECHINODERMATA.= { OPHIUROIDEA, OR BRITTLE-STARS.
- { CRINOIDEA, OR FEATHER-STARS AND
- { STONE-LILIES.
- { HOLOTHUROIDEA, OR SEA-CUCUMBERS.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XIII
-
-THE CHORDATA
-
-
-The older zoologists used to speak of Vertebrata and Invertebrata as
-animals with a back-bone and animals without one, and everyone thought
-it a very natural way of dividing up the animal kingdom. It never
-occurred to anyone that it was possible to bridge the interval between
-them and find a link between the two. But now the Vertebrata have been
-compelled to give up their aristocratic pretensions, and own that they
-have risen from the ranks of the common people of the animal world; in
-other words, that they are descended from the Invertebrates. Their
-family secrets have been published to the world, and now everybody knows
-that they have poor relations. But how many, and how nearly related?
-This we do not accurately know; consequently the whole zoological world
-for many years has concentrated all its energies on attempts to find out
-the truth about the matter.
-
-A great sensation was caused by the first discovery of a poor relation
-of the vertebrates among the Ascidians, or Leather-bottle animals. These
-are named from their shape and texture, for they have a leathery skin.
-Now some of these Ascidians have larvæ with a tail; and in the tail
-there is a long cord-like structure, which in many essential particulars
-resembles the cord which precedes the back-bone in the vertebrate
-embryo. This structure is called the Notochord (a string down the back).
-The credit of this great discovery belongs to Russia; for the presence
-of the Notochord in the Ascidian larva was discovered by A. Kowalevsky,
-in 1866.
-
-To the present generation of zoological students, the Chordate
-affinities of Ascidians are part of the ABC of knowledge; and it is
-hardly possible for them to realise that it is only thirty years ago
-since the idea was so new that Huxley, in his "Text-book of the
-Vertebrata," only alluded to it in a footnote. Would-be zoological
-critics, at a somewhat later period, met the theory with ridicule, for
-want of better argument. For critics include not only "those who have
-failed in literature and art," but also those who have failed in
-science.
-
-The majority of the Ascidians are sessile animals, which fix themselves,
-like Sea-Anemones, to some object when they have passed their earliest
-stages of growth; and although there are many forms that swim freely,
-most authorities are inclined to believe that these have arisen by
-adaptation, and that the kinds that are fixed when adult are the
-original type of the group.
-
-Anything more unlike what we should expect to find as a relative of the
-vertebrates could not possibly be imagined. What has been written about
-these little animals by various observers would make a whole series of
-volumes of the size of this one, so many are the puzzles afforded by
-their internal structure. The arrangement of their organs is in many
-respects very unsymmetrical. Their most striking peculiarity, perhaps,
-is the nature of the gills. These form a kind of basket-work, consisting
-of minute holes with intermediate supports; and they are associated with
-a special cavity outside them called the Atrial chamber. Into this the
-gills pass the sea-water which they have breathed.
-
-The group, as a whole, is sometimes considered to present evidence of
-having degenerated from a higher type; but whatever else may be doubtful
-or obscure in its history, the nature of the larval notochord is quite
-clear and certain; zoologists have never had any doubt about its nature
-since the first few years after its discovery.
-
-Ascidians are not at all uncommon animals on the English coast. Some of
-them may be met with on stones near low-water mark, and I have often
-seen them on the shells of oysters sold in the shops--for there the
-town-dwelling naturalist may often find a good many interesting things
-without much trouble. They are like little lumps of tough jelly; of
-various colours, according to the kind, red being the most common, and
-of very indefinite shape. You may see some of the colonial kinds forming
-pretty star-shaped patterns, attached to various objects, such as stones
-and the larger seaweeds.
-
-The place of Ascidians in classification was a puzzle, until their
-relationship with Vertebrates was discovered. At one time they were
-placed with the Mollusca. Now they are grouped, together with the
-Vertebrata and some other creatures that remain to be spoken of, under
-the name of Chordata, or animals possessing a Notochord.
-
-Some of the Ascidians present what has been already described in other
-types (p. 57) as "alternation of generations." The discovery of this
-fact was made by the poet Adelbert von Chamisso. Some of his verses are
-known to English readers, for whom they were translated by Mary Howitt,
-a poetess whose writings were popular with our grandmothers, and
-deserved to be so. This is not the only case in which a poet has been
-also a zoologist: Goethe studied the science, and framed a theory
-regarding the vertebrate skull, which he regarded as consisting of a
-series of vertebræ. In this he was less fortunate than the Italian
-poet; for while Chamisso's observations were correct, and were confirmed
-by subsequent writers, Goethe's theory of the skull is anything but
-correct. It was made worse, too, by the speculations of subsequent
-writers, who attempted to follow it into detail, with the result of
-demonstrating its absurdity.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XIV
-
-THE VERTEBRATA
-
-
-We have spoken of the Notochord as a structure which precedes the
-formation of the spinal column in Vertebrates. This needs a little more
-definite explanation. We all know that the spinal column of vertebrates
-is formed to protect the spinal cord. This protection is, however, an
-afterthought, so to speak, of the vertebrate structure; the lowest of
-all vertebrates is quite without it; and in the lower groups of fishes
-we may trace various steps of its formation. But in these cases where
-the spinal column is absent or incomplete, there is a large and
-well-developed notochord; and in the embryo of higher vertebrates, when
-the spinal column has not yet begun to be formed, the notochord is
-equally a conspicuous feature. It runs from the region known as the
-mid-brain, to the end of the tail, and lies throughout just beneath the
-spinal cord. Whatever its original use in the animal body may have
-been, it undoubtedly acts now as a support to the spinal cord, and
-indeed to the whole body. Bones, we must explain, do not exist either in
-the lower vertebrate, or in the early embryo. In the latter they are
-formed by degrees. The spinal cord and the notochord each begin to be
-surrounded by rings of cartilage or gristle, which by degrees is changed
-into bone. The rings surrounding the notochord, however, gradually
-encroach upon it and obliterate it. The place where it has been becomes
-the Centrum, or most solid part of each vertebra. The notochord at first
-is continuous, and has no division into successive parts; but when the
-bony spinal column is developed, it consists of a series of successive
-vertebræ. Each of them is made up of several parts, which by degrees
-become consolidated into the vertebræ.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 41.--_A_, The Notochord of Vertebrates. Section,
-considerably magnified, through the middle of an embryo one inch long,
-of Acanthias, one of the Spiny Dog-fishes allied to the sharks. 1,
-Section through Spinal Cord; 2, Section through Notochord; below it lies
-a bean-shaped space, which is a section through a large blood-vessel;
-_sk_, epiblast or skin; _me_, mesoblast or middle layer of the body; the
-dots represent the nuclei of its transparent cells. The intestine, _i_,
-lined with hypoblast, is traversed by a spiral valve, and surrounded by
-the horse-shoe shaped body-cavity. _B_, Diagram indicating the position
-of the Notochord in the vertebra of an adult Common Dog-fish (_Scyllium
-canicula_). 1, "Neural arch" of the vertebra, consisting of processes of
-bone enclosing the central nervous system, or spinal cord; 2, bony
-centrum of the vertebra, hollowed out into a cup, in which lies a soft
-pad, the remains of the notochord.]
-
-The lowest member of the vertebrate group, separated in fact from the
-true vertebrates and placed in a lower division all by itself, is the
-little animal called the Lancelet or Amphioxus. It is often spoken of as
-a "fish"; but it is only by a stretch of our courtesy that it can
-receive that name, being an animal of a much lower form than the fishes.
-It was discovered in 1834, in the Mediterranean, and described as a
-fish; but it had previously been discovered in 1778, by a German
-naturalist who described it as a slug. The latter was misled by its
-external shape. He had not the advantage of the modern methods of
-preparing animals for examination under the microscope; in these days,
-Amphioxus is cut into successive slices along its whole length, and each
-of these carefully magnified, so that no detail of structure is lost.
-The Amphioxus burrows in the sea-sand; it lies buried in it, with its
-mouth just uncovered. Its food consists of microscopic vegetable
-organisms. Its distribution is very wide; it is found in both the
-Atlantic and Pacific waters. It occurs most abundantly in the salt-water
-lakes of Sicily, and in the Gulf of Naples. The specimen first seen, in
-1778, came from the coast of Cornwall. There are eight species; the one
-which is found in the English Channel is the _Amphioxus lanceolatum_,
-also found in the Mediterranean and on the shores of North America.
-
-The classes of the Vertebrata are Fishes, Amphibia, Reptiles, Birds and
-Mammals. We used to learn that of these, fishes had gills, and Amphibia
-gills for a time; but, to be strictly accurate, we must say that fishes
-have gills, and _all_ the rest of the Vertebrata have gills for a
-time. There is no exception to this rule, not even among the highest
-vertebrates of all. But in those vertebrates which stand higher in the
-scale of life than Amphibia, viz., Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals, these
-gills are never brought into use. They only exist in the early embryo,
-and afterwards disappear, giving rise by their modification to other
-structures.
-
-Strange to say, one of these structures is the ear. This takes its
-origin from one of the gill-"clefts" or spaces. The Eustachian tube,
-which communicates between the ear and the nose, is part of this cleft;
-and the little bones which are inside the ear represent the bones
-of that gill-cleft. For, in fishes, bones support each gill, and
-are connected together to form a complex arrangement. In the higher
-vertebrates, which possess gills only in the embryo, this gill-skeleton
-is much modified, and persists as a bone, the hyoid bone supporting the
-tongue.
-
-The gills of vertebrates, arranged in successive pairs along the throat,
-are "perforating gills"; that is to say, they consist essentially of
-holes or spaces which pass right through the wall of the throat.
-
-If we were to seek for a general character of the vertebrates, besides
-those mentioned above, that they all possess a notochord and gills, we
-might also find it in the character of the skin. Fishes, Reptiles, Birds
-and Mammals, all agree in this, that they have a special clothing of the
-skin--scales, feathers and fur, respectively. These three kinds of
-structure, although so widely differing in appearance, are practically
-formed all in the same way, viz., by alternate ingrowths and outgrowths
-of the skin; the ingrowth forming the root of the scale, hair or
-feather, and the outgrowth its projecting part. If these infoldings and
-outgrowths of the skin could be straightened out into a plane surface,
-the skin of a small vertebrate would cover an enormous area. The above
-list excludes the Amphibia: in this class, it should be mentioned, the
-scales have been lost, and are only found in one group.
-
-The scales of Fishes were at one time proposed as a basis of
-classification: large groups being characterized respectively by the
-possession of plain rounded scales (cycloids), scales fringed at the
-posterior end (ctenoid, or comb-like); placoid scales, consisting of
-bony plates, and ganoid scales, large plates covered with shiny enamel.
-These distinctions, however, were not found useful as a guide in
-classification. The diagram shows the elaborate scales of the common
-sole.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 42.--Scales of the Common Sole, highly magnified.]
-
-Let us now consider some other creatures that resemble vertebrates in
-some ways, and help to form the group of Chordata. Balanoglossus is one
-of them, the Acorn-tongue Animal. This odd name is given to it on
-account of a structure which is called (like the elephant's trunk) a
-Proboscis; this may be compared with a tongue, so far as its use goes,
-for it is thrust out to catch prey and again drawn in. It is oval in
-shape, and therefore fancifully compared to an acorn. It is highly
-sensitive, being richly supplied with nerves. The creature is to all
-intents and purposes a kind of worm; and, like many of the higher
-worms, it has a larva with bands of cilia. This larva, which is better
-represented in some species than in others, was originally described
-under the name of _Tornaeria_. It is considered to resemble, in some
-degree, the larva of Echinoderms; on this hint, some zoologists have
-sought to establish a connection between Vertebrates and Echinoderms,
-and have been able to find other points of comparison besides the one
-named. It remains to be seen whether this suggestion will lead to
-further results. It may be added that the larva of Balanoglossus has
-also been compared with that of Phoronis (p. 122), thus assuming a
-relationship with the Polyzoa, and through them with the Brachiopoda. It
-appears, therefore, that the subject of the possible relationships of
-the Vertebrata is one of the greatest complexity. The last named theory,
-however, has been adversely criticised by very high authority.
-
-We have not, however, explained yet what is the claim of Balanoglossus
-to be grouped with the Chordata. This consists in the fact that a
-certain part associated with the interior of the proboscis has been
-identified, from its structure, mode of origin, and relations with
-the nerves, as a notochord. Balanoglossus also agrees with the true
-vertebrates in possessing successive pairs of perforating gills (see p.
-142), which are especially noticeable in the young animal. The presence
-of this feature is important, in view of the fact that some authorities
-have sought to throw doubt on the genuineness of the notochord of
-Balanoglossus.
-
-Balanoglossus is not without relations, some of which have been
-recently discovered, while others have been known for some time,
-although their affinities were not at first recognised. Among these
-the most remarkable are sessile forms which have received the names
-respectively of _Cephalodiscus_ and _Rhabdopleura_. Both produce buds
-and form a colony, and in both a notochord has been distinguished. The
-former was procured from the Straits of Magellan, while the latter makes
-its dwelling-place in a nearer region, having been found off the
-Shetland Islands, and off the Lofoden Islands. Cephalodiscus, which is a
-very curious creature, receives its name from a disc placed at the head
-end. The use of this structure is believed to be as follows. The units
-of the colony live inside a common system of tubes, which they secrete;
-each unit, when adult, is independent, and can move about inside the
-tubes; the disc is used as a means of attachment to successive spots of
-the tube-wall, as the animal wanders from place to place. Above the disc
-are twelve plume-like tentacles covered with cilia, which create a
-current in the water surrounding the head, and wash food particles into
-the mouth.
-
-That these creatures are but distant relations of the true vertebrates
-is a fact expressed by the names under which they are grouped in
-classification. Those forms which we have just described have received
-the name of Hemichordata--that is to say, Chordata which have but half a
-notochord, since the notochord is very restricted in extent; while the
-Ascidians are grouped under the name of Urochordata, or Chordata which
-only possess a notochord in the tail. The name of Adelochorda, "with an
-obscure chord," is sometimes applied to the Hemichordata.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE CHORDATA
-
- { HEMICHORDATA, BALANOGLOSSUS, &c.
- =CHORDATA.= { UROCHORDATA, THE ASCIDIANS.
- { VERTEBRATA, THE BACK-BONED ANIMALS.
-
-Let us return now to the Vertebrate. A character common to all the
-groups of the Vertebrata is the possession of teeth. Readers of the
-previous volumes of this series will recollect that, even among birds,
-instances of the possession of teeth may be found among fossil forms,
-although they are absent in the birds of the present day. In all the
-other divisions of the Vertebrata, the presence of teeth is the rule,
-their absence an exception so rare that we may easily note the chief
-instances of it. Among Amphibia, there are Toads that have no teeth;
-among Reptiles, the Tortoises and Turtles have none; among Mammals,
-teeth are wanting in _Echidna_, the Spiny Ant-eater; and in the
-Ant-eaters and the Whalebone Whales they are absent in the adult,
-although present in early embryonic life.
-
-The majority of people, if asked to give a definition of the meaning of
-teeth, would reply that they are hard structures that grow in the jaw.
-But this is an idea that requires very considerable modification from a
-scientific point of view. In the first place, they are found in other
-places besides the jaws; and in the second place, they are by rights
-structures originally belonging to the skin. Both these important facts
-must be illustrated by reference to the Fishes, which exhibit the
-primitive types of teeth.
-
-In fishes, not only are teeth found on the jawbone, but sometimes also
-on other bones which border upon the cavity of the mouth; they are found
-on the palatine bone, or roof-plate of the mouth, and, still more
-strange, upon bones which belong to the "hyoid apparatus," or skeleton
-of the gills (see above). The latter may form a set of throat-teeth,
-which are used for grinders, while the jaw-teeth are used for biting.
-Among the Carps, the jaw-teeth are reduced, and the fish depends upon
-its throat-teeth only. In the Wrasses, one pair of the bones that bear
-throat-teeth (the inferior pharyngeal bones) are fused, so as to form a
-stronger apparatus: and from this circumstance, the group of Fishes to
-which they belong has been given the name of Pharyngognathi, fishes
-possessing throat-jaws. They have, however, biting teeth as well, in the
-true jaws. The grinding teeth are apparently used for consuming the food
-in a leisurely manner when once it has been taken into the mouth.
-
-A curious circumstance in connection with these "throat-jaws" is, that
-they produce musical sounds. Fishes have other means, however, of
-producing a voice--usually by means of the swimming-bladder and muscles
-in connection with it. Probably they are able, to some extent, to effect
-communication with each other in this way.
-
-It has already been stated that teeth, in their primitive form, are to
-be regarded as skin-structures. Certain fish, which are looked upon as
-ancestral types, have, dispersed throughout the skin, a number of bony
-plates, or granules (placoid scales), more or less formidable, and
-tipped with a hard enamel-like substance. Teeth are regarded as but a
-special form of these. But if they are skin-structures, how come they in
-the mouth and throat? Because the mouth and throat are lined by an
-ingrowth from the external skin; the origin and growth of this is seen
-in the embryo.
-
-In the Mammalia the teeth, though restricted in number, attain the
-greatest possible variety of form, so that the jaws of different but
-allied species may be distinguished by their teeth.
-
-Let us now return to the lowest vertebrate of all, which has a large
-notochord and no bones. This is the _Amphioxus_, the Lancelet. Amphioxus
-has no bones whatever, and no head, in the sense in which we usually
-employ that term; that is to say, most of the structures which we see in
-the vertebrate head are undeveloped. The peculiarities of the structure
-of Amphioxus are many. Among them may be named the curious gills: these
-form a sort of basket-work along the sides of the throat, which at first
-sight bears little resemblance to the gills of fishes, and reminds us of
-those of Ascidians. The gills lead also, as in Ascidians, to another
-cavity, the Atrial chamber. This basket-work is formed, however, by the
-subdivision of the primary pairs of gills. These are very numerous,
-ninety pairs being sometimes named as the number. They cut up the wall
-of the throat to such an extent, that additional supporting bars are
-needed to strengthen it; and, by the formation of these, both in
-parallel and in transverse directions to the primary partitions, the
-"basket-work" is produced, as the growth of the animal proceeds.
-
-The primitive nature of the notochord is, however, perhaps the most
-striking feature of Amphioxus. The chord passes to the front of the
-animal's snout--head it can hardly be called--instead of ending in the
-middle of the brain, as in true vertebrates, for there is, indeed, no
-"brain" of any extent to lie in front of it; and the notochord, together
-with the spinal cord itself, have no other protection than a fibrous
-sheath. The spinal column is thus entirely absent, except so far as it
-may be regarded as represented by this thin sheath.
-
-The Lancelet also differs from the true vertebrates, in that it has no
-limbs. There is a fringing fin along the body, but it is not comparable
-with the fins of fishes. It differs also in possessing no teeth.
-
-In one respect, however, the Lancelet reminds us of a fish: and that is
-in the arrangement of its muscles; these form a successive series of
-overlapping masses on each side of the body, as in a fish.
-
-The development of the Lancelet presents us with an instance of
-the two-layered larva, or Gastrula. This shows that Amphioxus is a
-comparatively primitive type. But it has been suspected that it is less
-primitive than it looks, and that it has degenerated from some higher
-form, owing to its preferring a dull mode of existence, half-buried in
-sand or mud.
-
-There is a huge gap between the Lancelet and the true vertebrates. The
-lowest form of the latter is _Ammocoetes_, the larva of the Lamprey
-(_Petromyzon_). The latter, even in the adult form, has no true limbs,
-though there are fringing fins. The notochord sheath is supplemented,
-however, by cartilage bars which are equivalent to the beginnings of the
-vertebræ of the back-bone. The gills are very different from those of
-other true vertebrates, and it has no jaws. Teeth it has, however, on
-the tongue and the lining of the mouth. Probably this creature is
-greatly altered by adaptation to its peculiar mode of life, so that no
-certain conclusions can be drawn from it regarding the structure of
-primitive fishes. It has a sucking mouth, by means of which it hangs on
-to fishes, while it rasps away their flesh with its rough tongue. When
-not thus engaged, it hangs on to a stone by means of its suctional
-mouth, thus fixing itself at rest. The Hag-fish, _Myxine_, in many
-respects similar, devours dead fishes chiefly. The Hag-fish is found on
-English coasts: so is the Marine Lamprey; while two freshwater forms are
-found in streams.
-
-Leaving the Cyclostomata, as the above fishes are called, we reach the
-true fishes, which have limbs and scales. Something has already been
-said regarding their teeth and gills. The Cartilaginous fishes, in
-which most part of the skeleton remains gristle and does not become
-transformed into bone, include the Sharks, Rays, and Dog-fishes, all
-savage animals with strong teeth. The common spotted Dog-fish of our own
-shores is familiar to everybody: fishermen regard it with disgust, as it
-is not eatable. The Rays are flattened fishes, which live at the bottom
-of rather deep water, and attain enormous size even on our own coasts.
-The Thornback Skate is covered with prickles (placoid scales). All these
-fishes are grouped under the name of Elasmobranchii, the Strap-gilled,
-so called from the structure of the gill-arches.
-
-The majority of familiar fishes, such as the herring, mackerel, cod and
-sole, belong to the group of _Teleostei_, or Bony Fishes, in which, by
-contradistinction from the last group, as much of the skeleton as
-possible becomes bone. Nevertheless, traces of the notochord persist in
-the back-bone of these fishes. Break the back-bone across, of a cod or a
-sole, and you will find between adjacent sides of the centra, or middle
-parts of the vertebræ, a pad of gristly substance. This is the remaining
-substance of the notochord, which finds room between the cup-shaped
-sides of the centra. When the centrum, instead of being biconcave, is
-solid, as in the higher Vertebrata, the notochord is obliterated by its
-encroachment.
-
-The Amphibia, familiarly represented by Frogs and Toads, receive their
-name, "adapted for both lives," from the fact that they usually divide
-their lives between land and water. They are, from one point of view,
-the most interesting of the classes of the Vertebrata, for they form a
-dividing line between the lower and upper Chordata. Below we have
-Hemichordata, Ascidians, Amphioxus, Fishes; all water-dwellers,
-breathing by gills. Above, we have Reptiles, Birds, Mammals,
-air-breathers, never possessing gills, except for a short time, as
-rudiments in the embryo, not brought into use. They are linked by the
-Amphibia, in which we see the larva a water-dweller, breathing by gills;
-the adult, an air-breather, adapted for life on land, and obliged to
-come to the surface to breathe, even when it passes its time in the
-water. The individual Amphibian tells us the past history of the higher
-groups; once they had gills--but growing older, they lost them.
-
-Fig. 43 shows us an outline sketch of Amphibian larvæ; we should require
-an enlarged diagram of an earlier stage, to show the gills, which are
-external and projecting at first, but afterwards are overgrown by the
-skin with the exception of an orifice on each side. The diagram shows
-the gradual change of form. The tails in these tadpoles will presently
-be lost, for they belong to the Anura, or tail-less order of Amphibia
-(Frogs and Toads). The tailed Amphibians, Urodela, are represented in
-Great Britain by the Newts, _Triton_, popularly called Efts. Belonging
-to the Tailed Amphibians also, is the Axolotl, a creature found in the
-lakes of Mexico, and in those of the Rocky Mountains. It may or may not
-retain its gills; and forms with gills, and forms without, may be found
-in the same lake, each capable of laying eggs. The two forms were at
-first described under two different generic names: but when specimens of
-the gill-bearing _Siredon_, kept in confinement, lost their gills, it
-was seen that they became _Amblystoma_. There are other cases of larval
-forms that produce young, and this curious occurrence is known as
-"pædogenesis."
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 43.--Tadpoles, three-quarters of their natural size.
-_A_ to _D_, different stages of the Tadpole of the Common Toad, from
-Epping Forest, England. _E_, Tadpole of _Pelodytes punctatus_, dorsal
-view.]
-
-The Amphibia include the curious creatures called Cæciliæ (blind
-animals), or Gymnophiona. They are snake-like in form, and are without
-limbs; they burrow underground. Their real place in classification was
-not found out at first, but they were classed, by a wrong shot, with the
-Reptiles. They are interesting as being the only Amphibians that have
-scales. These are very minute, embedded in the skin, and arranged in
-transverse rings. The name Gymnophiona, naked serpents, is therefore
-doubly inapplicable: for they are not serpents, and not scaleless.
-
-The Reptiles and Birds at first sight seem to be widely different. The
-latter are the warmest blooded of all vertebrates, the former are
-coldblooded. The one wear feathers, the other scales. Nevertheless,
-there is an intimate connection between them; the reader has doubtless
-already learned from other sources the facts about their relationship,
-so we will not here do more than recall a few of these facts. One is,
-that the birds of earlier times had teeth in their beaks, and possessed
-jointed tails. Another, that the Reptiles of earlier times included
-forms that were able to fly. A third notable fact is the presence of
-claws on the wings of some birds, showing that the wing of the bird was
-not always wholly specialised for use in flight.
-
-We owe to Professor Huxley, the recognition of the close relationship of
-Birds and Reptiles, and the name Sauropsida (Reptile-like animals),
-under which both are included. They agree in being air-breathers and
-never having gills, except the rudiments present in the early embryo:
-this distinguishes them from Amphibia. They agree in having the skull
-set on to the back-bone by a single articulating surface or condyle; and
-thus differ alike from Amphibia and from Vertebrata. They agree in
-having the red corpuscles of the blood nucleated; and in this differ
-from the Mammalia, in which the red corpuscles are non-nucleated discs.
-From a popular point of view, we may say that the striking distinction
-between birds and reptiles lies in beauty and ugliness. Even in their
-eggs, the reptiles display no love for adornment, no colouring or
-pattern. Fig. 44 shows the eggs of some reptiles.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 44.--Eggs of Reptiles, half the natural size.
-_A_, of African Cobra. _B_, of Common English Snake. _C_, of Common
-English Lizard, _Lacerta agilis_. _D_, of Elephantine Tortoise. _E_,
-of Crocodile.]
-
-The five chief groups of existing reptiles are the Chelonia (Tortoises
-and Turtles); the Rhyncocephala, represented only by _Hatteria_, a
-lizard found in New Zealand; the Lacertilia or Lizards; the Ophidia, or
-Snakes and Serpents; and the Crocodilia.
-
-Perhaps the most interesting point regarding the reptiles that can be
-mentioned in brief space, is the fact that they present traces of a
-median third eye, which have been described by Baldwin Spencer, in the
-New Zealand Hatteria, and in other reptiles. It is situated on the roof
-of the brain. While the structure in Hatteria shows it to be an eye, its
-position corresponds with that of the pineal gland of vertebrates
-generally; so that we find, in fact, the trace of a third eye in all
-vertebrates, including ourselves. It is, however, a trace only. In the
-Lamprey fishes as well as in _Hatteria_, it reaches a further degree of
-development. This pineal eye has been compared in structure to the eye
-of Ascidians.
-
-The Birds, excluding the extinct form with teeth and a jointed tail,
-to which the group name of Archæornithes is given, fall into two
-groups. These are the Ratitæ, or Birds with Raft-like, _i.e._ flat,
-breast-bones, and the Carinatæ, or Birds with keeled breast-bones. The
-former include the African Ostrich (_Struthio_), the American Ostrich
-(_Rhea_), the Australian Emu, the Cassowary of New Guinea, and the Kiwi,
-or Apteryx of New Zealand; all of them birds that cannot fly. The
-vast majority of birds belong to the Carinatæ, characterised by the
-projecting keel (Carina) in the middle of the breast-bone. The presence
-of this, which affords a safe attachment for strong muscles, is
-associated with the power of flight. It is impossible to treat the birds
-more fully in the space allotted to this little story, but a few words
-about feathers, however, may find a place here.
-
-The colour of feathers is a subject of much interest. Everyone is
-familiar with the brilliant tints often presented by the feathers of
-birds, and everyone who is a close observer of natural objects knows
-that there are some feathers which are iridescent, changing colour
-according to the direction in which light falls on them. It has been
-shown by Dr. Gadow that this variation of the colour of a feather is due
-to its structure; this may be described as prismatic, for the small
-divisions of the feather present acute angular edges, which reflect the
-light like the edges of a prism. These are symmetrically repeated all
-along the feathers, so as to reflect the same colour throughout. Thus in
-the plumage of the common red and green parrot, we see feathers that are
-red when held in one position, and yellow when shifted to another
-position; while there are also feathers that are blue when seen in one
-position, and green when seen in another; the alternative colour being
-the one next in order in the rainbow.
-
-Another point regarding the colours of feathers has no doubt puzzled
-many of our readers; and that is, the metallic quality of the colouring
-in some exceptional feathers, and in these only. The feathers of the
-parrot just referred to, are, for instance, simply red and yellow, or
-blue and green; but the feathers of the peacock, though displaying the
-same colours, show a metallic lustre which is wanting in the other case.
-The feathers of the starling, the blackbird, and the black hen of the
-farmyard, though not so brilliant as those of the peacock, are the same
-as regards the quality of the light they reflect. The secret of the
-difference lies in the greater opacity of the feathers named; they are
-_black_ feathers, while those of the parrot are light-coloured. Now
-after the metals themselves, there are few objects in nature so opaque
-as the black pigment of a black feather. If a thin section through
-the roots of young black feathers is cut for examination under the
-microscope, the pigmented parts, although cut so very thin, appear
-completely opaque. And just as a glass gives a better reflection when
-backed by something opaque, so does the reflecting surface of the
-feather. Hence it is that the quality of the colours reflected by these
-feathers is what we call "metallic." If we ask for a definition of this
-metallic brightness, other than the accepted fact that it resembles the
-light reflected from metals, the artist will reply that it consists in
-two things--(1) the greater brilliancy of the light reflected, that is
-to say the greater completeness of the reflection; and (2) the entire
-absence of those gradations of light which are afforded by the
-reflections from any object, however dark, that possesses a surface
-translucent, even in the smallest degree. "Metallic" reflections, in
-fact, may be defined as those in which the greatest amount of light is
-reflected, and the reflected sunlight receives from the reflecting
-surface the least possible degree of modification. While the actual tint
-of the colour reflected by a black feather, then, is determined by the
-form and position of its angular ridges, the quality of the reflection
-is determined by the opacity of the substance itself. It is interesting
-to note that the opacity necessary for reflecting a "metallic" lustre,
-may be produced by means of pigment, in the vegetable as well as in the
-animal organism; for instance, in the dark centres of _Coreopsis_ (the
-Beetle Flower), and several other fashionable garden plants belonging to
-the Compositæ or Daisy family. Within the animal kingdom, we may note
-that the metallic lustre is almost entirely confined to land animals;
-their dry skins have more chance to develop opaque parts, than the moist
-tissues of creatures that live in the water. The most familiar exception
-to this rule is the Sea-Mouse, an Annelid worm found on English coasts
-(p. 73), which receives its odd name because it is a fat oval creature,
-covered with bristles, thus greatly differing in appearance from most
-worms. The larger bristles, which are of a dark purplish-black colour,
-have a bronze or golden metallic lustre. Various other annelids exhibit
-brilliant rainbow colours; for example, _Nereis_, the Rainbow Worm, also
-found on English shores; but without the underlying black opaque
-pigment, the reflections from the surface fall short of absolutely
-metallic brightness. On land, we see among the insects innumerable forms
-which present a metallic lustre, the beetles being the most notable in
-this respect. To return to the vertebrates, from which we started,
-everybody must have noticed that the fur of a clean well-kept black cat,
-when lit up by the bright sunlight in which the animal loves to bask,
-shows little rainbow reflections of red and green. These are due to the
-presence of little grooves and irregularities on the surface of the
-hairs, which play the same part in breaking up the light which they
-reflect, as do the sharp angles of iridescent feathers. Like the
-iridescence of the Rainbow Worm, they fall short of absolutely metallic
-brightness; the fault in this case being due not to the nature of the
-underlying stratum, so much as to the incomplete development of the
-light-reflecting grooves. Yet this instance serves to show the part
-taken by the dark pigment; for while the play of colours is perfectly
-obvious in the fur of a black cat, it is almost impossible to
-distinguish it in the case of cats with fur of lighter shades.
-
-The Mammalia, or animals that suckle their young and produce them by
-birth, were formerly considered to be sharply defined from animals that
-lay eggs, such as the birds and reptiles. But in 1884 Mr. Caldwell
-confirmed the statement which had been made previously, yet hardly
-credited by the scientific world, to the effect that the lowest form of
-mammals lays eggs. This, the Duck-Mole or _Ornithorhyncus anatinus_
-(Bird-billed animal much like a goose), is a native of Australia and
-Tasmania. It lives on the banks of rivers, and burrows in the bank. It
-has webbed feet, and therefore sometimes receives the name of Platypus
-(flat-foot). It lays eggs two at a time, in its burrow; and these eggs,
-like those of other egg-laying vertebrates, have a yolk.
-
-A kindred form, _Echidna hystrix_ or Spiny Ant-eater, is found in
-Australia, Tasmania, and New Guinea. The _Echidna_ hatches its young
-in a temporary pocket, which appears in the neighbourhood of the
-breasts, and disappears after the young are old enough to take care of
-themselves. The _Ornithorhyncus_ has fur, the _Echidna_ has spines, with
-hairs between them. Neither bears the slightest resemblance to a bird;
-the comparison suggested in the name of _Ornithorhyncus_ is fanciful,
-and depends chiefly on the flat beak-like mouth; these egg-laying
-quadrupeds may, however, be reasonably brought into comparison with
-Reptiles. Neither of them has any teeth; the _Echidna_ has no teeth at
-all; the _Ornithorhyncus_ loses them at an early stage of growth, and
-develops instead hard horny patches in each jaw. With these it crushes
-its food, which consists of small insects, worms, etc. The _Echidna_, on
-the contrary, lives in rocky places, and feeds on ants, which it
-searches for with its long-pointed snout. These two genera are grouped
-under the name of Prototheria or Primitive Mammals.
-
-The pocket in which _Echidna_ hatches its young, suggests a relationship
-with the next group, the Metatheria or Marsupialia, which are the
-characteristic mammals of Australasia. These are distinguished by the
-possession of a permanent nursery-pocket, the "marsupium." In this they
-put their young, which are born, like those of other mammals, not
-hatched from eggs like those of the last group. They are, however, born
-in a very backward condition, and therefore require to go through a
-further period of incubation, so to speak, in the marsupium. Here each
-one attaches itself to a teat, to which it remains fixed. But it cannot
-suck as a new-born kitten or puppy does; and the milk is forced down its
-throat by the muscles of the teat.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 45.--Skull and Lower Jaw of Great Kangaroo,
-_Macropus giganteus_, much reduced.]
-
-The Marsupialia are not entirely confined to Australasia; a few occur
-in South America, and in North America they are represented by the
-"'possum," _i.e._ Opossum, of American stories. The Marsupials seem
-almost to mimic the forms of ordinary quadrupeds. Thus _Notoryctes_, a
-form discovered a few years ago, mimics a mole. The fact is that, just
-as among the Eutheria, or higher mammals, special types have become
-established, possessed of certain habits, and especially of certain
-habits with regard to food, and modified in accordance with those
-habits. Thus there are among them savage carnivora, harmless herbivora,
-and rodents; and these respectively share certain characteristics in
-common with the carnivora, herbivora, and rodents, belonging to the
-Eutheria. One of the herbivorous marsupials is the Great Kangaroo,
-_Macropus_. It gets its name, Large-foot, from the size of its
-hind-paws; on these it stands, and by their aid it takes remarkably long
-leaps. Its skull is shown in Fig. 45; this, however, has not the full
-set of teeth, some of which are soon shed. It crops the herbage with its
-front teeth, and grinds it with its back teeth, like other herbivora.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 46.--Skull and lower jaw of Rodent; _i_, _i_,
-incisor teeth, separated by a long interval from the molars. About
-one-half the natural size.]
-
-The study of the teeth is of great help in the classification of the
-Mammalia. Of the eight orders of the Eutheria, two alone, the Sloth
-order and the Whale order, show a tendency to the suppression of the
-teeth. Those of the herbivora and carnivora may easily be compared by
-anyone, in the sheep and the dog respectively. Fig. 46 shows the skull
-of a Rodent, with elongated front teeth, adapted for that persistent
-gnawing which makes the animals of the order, such as the Rat and
-Rabbit, so terribly destructive.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE MAMMALIA
-
-
- { 1. PROTOTHERIA, or EGG-LAYING MAMMALS.
- { One order, the MONOTREMATA.
- =MAMMALIA.= {
- { 2. METATHERIA, or MARSUPIAL MAMMALS.
- {
- { 3. EUTHERIA, or HIGHER MAMMALS.
-
-The Mammalia are a terrestrial group. Exceptions are the Cetacea
-(Whales), Sirenia (Dugongs), and Seals or Sea-Carnivora, but all of
-these are air-breathers; even the Whale can only stay under water for a
-limited period of time. Hence we see that none of them are really
-animals belonging to the water; they are land animals adapted for life
-in the water.
-
-This brings us very near to the last chapter in the Story of Animal
-Life. We have seen that our story began with the One-celled Animals, and
-went on with the tale of the Two-layered Animals, in which each layer
-was built up by cells in partnership. From Two-layered Animals we passed
-to Three-layered Animals, and from them to Three-layered Animals with a
-"body-cavity." When we reached the latter, we found amongst them traces
-of the ancestry of the vertebrates. From the lowest of the Vertebrata,
-the Lancelet, we passed on to the Lamprey, and from that to the true
-fishes. In the latter we found the parent type of all the other
-Vertebrata, possessing gills in the adult, while the latter only possess
-them, or traces of them, in early stages of growth. The Amphibia formed
-a group to themselves, in which we traced the loss of gills in the
-adult. In the Reptiles, four-legged egg-laying animals, we found not
-only a close relationship with birds, but also, through the four-legged
-egg-laying _Ornithorhyncus_, a relationship with the Mammalia. The last
-group comprises all the furry animals, and culminates in the order
-Primates, in which the great Cuvier included Man.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMAL LIFE BETWEEN LAND AND WATER
-
- KEY TO TABLE:
-
- A ARTHROPODA.
- B VERTEBRATA.
- C CHORDATA.
-
- LAND WATER
-
- Except a few forms living --All the PROTOZOA.
- living in damp
- places, or as
- parasites
- --All the SPONGES.
- --All the COELENTERATA.
- Except a few forms --VERMES.
- terrestrial, and
- many parasitic
-
- Insects, except --A very few adult forms and }
- Except Wood-lice and a few larvæ. }
- a very few others --CRUSTACEA. } A
- Spider-like animals, }
- except --_Limulus._ }
- --All the BRACHIOPODA.
- --All the POLYZOA.
- --All the ECHINODERMATA.
- Except the Land-snails --MOLLUSCA.
- --HEMICHORDATA. }
- --UROCHORDATA, or Ascidians. }
- --All the Fishes: (some few can }
- exist in damp places) } }
- Amphibia belong to both. } }
- All the Reptiles --Except swimming forms, } }
- which are nevertheless } }
- air-breathers, only } }
- partially adapted for } }
- water life: Tortoises } }
- and Turtles, Crocodiles } }
- and Water-Snakes, _e.g._ } } C
- } }
- All the Birds: swimming and } B }
- diving forms are only adapted } }
- for temporary visits to the } }
- water } }
- All the Mammals --Except Whales, Sirenia, } }
- and Seals, which are } }
- nevertheless } }
- air-breathers, only } }
- partially adapted } }
- for water life. } }
-
-Another volume of this series, "The Story of the Earth," has already
-dealt with the distribution of animal life in time; while "The Story of
-Animal Life in the Sea" tells about the present inhabitants of the
-ocean. It is therefore unnecessary to say much in this volume regarding
-the distribution of animal life. A table is, however, appended, which is
-not without interest. It shows how the chief great groups of animals are
-divided between land life and water life, whether in fresh water or
-salt. It will be seen that the terrestrial animals are much in a
-minority, and that they belong, for the most part, to the higher types.
-They are, in fact, stragglers, bold emigrants from the early home of
-animal life, which lies in the more shallow parts of the waters of the
-sea.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XV
-
-MAN
-
-
-If we are to accept the opinion of Dr. Isaac Watts, man, as a moral
-being, is distinctly inferior to the "birds in their little nests," who
-live in harmony with one another; and, again, if we are to believe
-Solomon, he is by no means always the equal in intelligence of the Ant.
-Yet somehow it came as a shock to many who had been accustomed to revere
-both these authors, when they were asked, early in the latter half of
-the nineteenth century, to regard man, from a zoological point of view,
-as just a little superior to the Apes.
-
-Then arose a great agitation as to the possibility of finding the
-Missing Link. We shall see later on in this chapter, that if Research
-had been content, like Charity, to begin at home, its industry would
-have been duly rewarded.
-
-But inquiry, carried far afield in time and place, has not been without
-result. For it is generally believed that the remains found in 1894 in
-Java by Dr. Eugène Dubois, are veritably those of the Missing Link.
-These remains, which consist of the top of a skull, two teeth and a
-thigh bone, belong either to the oldest Pleistocene age, or to the upper
-Pliocene; they are found in association with the remains of other
-animals, among which are included some forms now extinct, or absent from
-that region. These ape-like remains have been carefully compared with
-those of the lowest races of man which have hitherto been found in a
-fossil state, and the result of the comparison is as follows: Of twelve
-experts present at the Zoological Congress held at Leyden, "three held
-that the fossil remains belonged to a low race of man, three declared
-them to be those of a man-like ape of great size; the rest maintained
-that they belonged to an intermediate form, which directly connected
-primitive man with the anthropoid apes" (Haeckel). To the creature
-represented by these bones has been assigned the name of
-_Pithecanthropus erectus_, the Upright Ape-Man.
-
-Let us now return from the subject of the Java fossil to those inquiries
-which, as we have above suggested, begin at home. We have already
-referred to the great principle of modern zoology, that the history of
-the development of the individual sums up the history of the development
-of the race. Of late years it has occurred to scientific men to apply
-this principle in the case of human beings, and to ask, "What can the
-baby teach us?"
-
-The Baby, for one thing, has a very small nose, insignificant compared
-with the size of its jaw. At least scientists find that this is the case
-with their babies--if would, of course, be invidious to make such a
-remark regarding their friends' children; and still more so to add, that
-in this the Baby differs from the human adult, and somewhat resembles
-the Ape, in which the nose is still less prominent, and the jaw still
-more so. Observations have been made, too, regarding the Baby's
-remarkable power of "holding on" with its hands. While a Baby is, in
-most respects, a very weak creature, yet its powers of grip have been
-favourably compared with those of adult human beings. No one who has
-ever tried to rescue his watch or his hair from the clutches of a
-friend's Baby, will feel inclined to doubt the conclusions of scientific
-observers regarding the point in question.
-
-The observations above referred to were made by Dr. Louis Robinson. He
-drew his conclusions from the study of sixty cases, all of them infants
-less than a month old; and of these at least half were tested within an
-hour of their birth.
-
-In every instance except two, says Dr. Robinson, the child was able to
-hang on by its hands to the finger, or to a small stick three quarters
-of an inch in diameter, and to sustain the whole weight of its body for
-at least ten seconds. "In twelve cases, in infants under an hour old,
-half a minute passed before the grasp relaxed, and in three or four
-cases nearly a minute." In infants of about four days old, increased
-strength was shown, and "nearly all, when tried at this age, could
-sustain their weight for half a minute. At about a fortnight or three
-weeks after birth the faculty appeared to have attained its maximum,
-for several at this period succeeded in hanging for over a minute and a
-half, two for over two minutes, and one infant of three weeks old for
-_two minutes thirty-five seconds_!" "Thus," says Dr. Robinson, "a
-three-weeks-old baby can perform a feat of muscular strength that would
-tax the powers of many a healthy adult. If any of my readers doubt
-this," he adds, "let them try hanging by their hands from a horizontal
-bar for three minutes."
-
-In these facts Dr. Robinson finds something to remind us of the
-ape-babies that owe their safety to their capability of holding on to a
-tree-climbing mother; and also something to suggest connection with an
-ancestor which, although well accustomed to the use of its hands, had
-yet to learn the use of its feet for walking on flat ground.
-
-The same author, in discussing the "Meaning of a Baby's Footprint," has
-shown that the foot of a young child bears traces of adaptation to a
-state of existence in which it was used for purposes other than that of
-walking.
-
-"The toes of infants," says Dr. Robinson, "are much more mobile than
-those of adults. The great toe is shorter than the second and third,
-and is often separated from the second by a considerable interval.
-The four outer toes can be, and frequently are, bent downwards so as
-to show a distinct knuckle on the upper aspect of the foot at the
-metatarso-phalangeal joint, and when at the same time the great toe is
-flexed and turned inwards towards the sole, the front part of the foot
-makes a very respectable fist. The great and little toes are often made
-to approach one another beneath the rest, and I have seen one child who
-could almost make them touch, and who habitually would endeavour to make
-the great toe oppose the others when any graspable object was brought
-into contact with the front part of the sole."[E]
-
-[E] _Nineteenth Century_ for May, 1892.
-
-Regarding the lines in the sole of the foot, Dr. Robinson says: "The
-sole is covered with lines of a character exactly similar to those on
-the hand; and when the toes are bent downwards these become deep
-creases, showing that they are, like the palmar lines, the natural
-folding-places of the integument to facilitate the action of
-grasping.... The lines are scarcely visible at fourteen months old, and
-are only present in a few cases after the age of two years. In adults no
-trace of them can be seen when the foot is at rest, and only the
-faintest indication at one or two spots when the toes are flexed to the
-utmost. The obliteration is doubtless owing to the foot being used as an
-organ for progression rather than prehension, and it will be seen that
-the most distinct line crosses the sole at the spot where the epidermis
-is always dense and callous, and the subcutaneous tissues thickened into
-a cushion-like pad by the pressure and friction consequent on walking.
-This line undoubtedly marks the place where the chief fold in the skin
-was situated, when the toes were habitually clasped round some object
-such as the branch of a tree." It has been pointed out by other writers
-that the lines of the sole of the foot can plainly be seen in the adult
-foot of some savage races. It must be added, however, that the survival
-of the lines in the adult civilised foot is by no means so rare as Dr.
-Robinson's remarks would lead one to suppose. I have seen instances in
-which they were quite clearly marked. It must be added that anyone who
-wishes to confirm my observations in this respect must be careful not to
-mistake lines of disfigurement, caused by the pressure of boots, which
-are sufficiently common, for the primitive lines of the foot.
-
-The child, as it grows, ceases to remind us of the ape. Its nose gets
-bigger as its toes cease to wriggle and learn to stand. But, for years
-of its life, it is only too apt to remind us of the savage. How greedy
-it often is! How readily it snatches that which does not belong to it!
-How quick it is to quarrel with its playmates, and to fight! How noisy
-when at play! How cross when it meets with disappointment! How fond of
-tawdry things! In all these qualities we see the history of the race,
-repeating itself in the life of the individual. The savage has preceded
-the civilised family--the child shows us the faults of a lower race.
-With the elapse of years they disappear, and are replaced by the more
-amiable and gracious manners of the adult human being.
-
-Nor do we need to go into the nursery to find links with our inferiors.
-Much, indeed far too much, has been written of late years about
-"atavistic degeneracy"; that is to say, degeneracy which imitates the
-characteristics of our forefathers. Many things which are classed as
-diseases, whether of the body, mind, or moral nature, may be explained
-in this way. Take the gills, which, as we have stated, exist in all
-vertebrates, but not in the adult of the highest groups. In a sickly
-individual, even among the highest vertebrates, traces of these are
-sometimes seen existing in the adult, as a gap or open space in the
-neck, called by the medical man "cervical fistula": this is an instance
-of degeneracy in the body. Take, for another instance, the kleptomaniac,
-who snatches up everything he takes a fancy to, although he is not in
-want. This is degeneracy of the mind, a relic of savage nature out of
-place in civilised man. Yet the gill-space is an ancestral feature which
-has its right time to appear, though it is out of place in the adult;
-and the "want-to-snatch" stage, as we have already seen, is quite
-natural in the young child. A parallel instance to the last is that of
-the hysterical girl who invents all sorts of tales about her harrowing
-adventures, weaving in stories she has heard of other people, with an
-account of her own life. She is an impostor; but her instinct for
-weaving yarns is that of the savage, who is the more admired by his
-fellows the more he can show himself a liar. Even the dangerous
-criminal, such as the Anarchist assassin, is comparable with the
-treacherous savage, who stabs his guest, and with the fierce animal that
-bites the hand that feeds it.
-
-The causes of degeneracy may seem obscure. But if we turn to our
-gardens, how easily is the process understood! Leave a cultivated plant
-to look after itself; neither watered, nor manured, nor weeded; and how
-long will it be before the plant resembles its wild ancestors? The
-flower will be less fine, the leaves more weedy; the whole aspect of the
-plant is changed. The causes: insufficient food and water, and the
-struggle for root space, standing-room, and light, with the weeds
-around it. Just in like manner the human being, when unfed, unwashed,
-and untaught, begins to degenerate. The want of fresh air and light
-associated with slum life, and even in the country, associated with the
-homes of the poor, are factors in the case that are not to be forgotten.
-Add to these drink, and the other sins of the fathers which are visited
-on the children. All these are among the causes of degeneracy.
-
-Nay more, the very virtues of the parents, as we account them, may lead
-to the degeneracy of the offspring. Overwork, either physical or mental,
-causes the deterioration of the family, and in our days nearly every man
-successful in any career, either commercial or intellectual, is guilty
-of overwork. The "haste to be rich," equally with the haste to be
-famous, tells on the next generation. Those who are fond of moralising
-at the expense of their neighbours, enjoy pointing out the
-unsatisfactory careers of the sons of men who have become rich. Almost
-invariably such a one is idle, we are told, and fond of pleasure.
-Good cause has he to be so. He comes into the world with weakened
-constitution, owing to his father's strenuous career; and if he were to
-work as hard as his father, he would probably soon be dead; or at least
-his children, in their turn, would be miserable and diseased. Nature
-guides his inclinations, and whispers "Do not work too hard," "Do not
-deny yourself too much"; and thus, so long as his father's money
-maintains him, his life is preserved.
-
-What is the kind of degeneracy that overtakes the family of the
-brain-worker? The modern world is full of it. We owe to the unamiable
-genius of Max Nordau a criticism of the intellectual world of the
-present day, which attributes well-nigh all the follies of intellectual
-cliques to degeneracy. Poetry, which is "full of sound and fury,
-signifying nothing," rich in rhyme and alliteration, but wanting in
-sense; art which seeks effect by loud and inharmonious colours; music
-which rejects "mere melody": in these the critic sees the taste of the
-savage, fond of a jingle of words, fond of bright colours, and ignorant
-of middle tints; and fond of noise without a tune.
-
-The so-called æsthetic movement which, a few years ago, wrought such
-marvels in decoration and in dress, comes in for a share of the critic's
-analysis. The dull senses of the degenerate cannot appreciate the soft
-colours which ordinary persons like to look at; to attract his attention
-and to please his fancy, he must have staring red, or staring blue. Or,
-if he possesses an object which is of special interest, he must bring
-this into contrast with a very sombre background, lest by chance it
-should miss being seen.
-
-I met with an amusing instance the other day which is much to the point.
-In a remote part of the British Isles, two friends, immigrants from the
-world of "culture," had been criticising the landscape. It was a pity,
-they agreed, that everything was so grey and dull; otherwise the
-neighbourhood might have been pretty. If only the cottagers could be got
-to grow something in their gardens that would give a touch of _colour_
-to the scene! These poor creatures had before their purblind sight all
-Nature's rich harmony of colour, which affords such pleasure to persons
-of true taste. Green fields, brown rocks, blue sea, and blue sky, all
-were dull to them. Wild flowers of a score of kinds, and bright with
-every colour--these were too insignificant to be visible. They wanted
-some big patch of vivid colour, perfectly inappropriate to the climate
-and surroundings. Some exotic plant was needed, in their opinion, to
-give a touch of brightness. The harmony of colour and beauty of form in
-our native plants, and in the common flowers of cottage gardens, were
-imperceptible to their unobservant eyes. Their intelligence was on a
-level with that of the savage, who is impressed by new and striking
-objects, and delighted by gaudy colours, but finds no beauty in wild
-nature or in accustomed things. These people were typical specimens of
-the degenerate of the book-reading classes; dull of understanding and
-wanting in taste, as the result of mental overwork in several successive
-generations; immeasurably inferior in æsthetic capabilities to the
-untaught peasants and fishermen of the district they would fain
-enlighten--for these appreciate the beauty of their country, and love
-its flowers.
-
-Much might be added regarding atavistic degeneracy, as an explanation of
-the mental and moral defects of human beings. Its most frequent form,
-perhaps, is that of mere laziness. The Ape does not work; nor does the
-savage, if he can possibly help it. Civilised man, if thoroughly sound
-in mind and body, likes activity, and activity with a purpose. The poor
-man takes a pride in his labour; the rich man takes a pride in his skill
-in games, his learning, or his efforts to benefit others. The idler,
-disinclined for either hearty work or hearty play, is a Degenerate. Of
-late there has been much discussion of a plan for treating the confirmed
-idler as a criminal. It will be seen from the remarks made above, that
-there are equally good reasons for treating him as an invalid. In
-criticising the plans of would-be reformers, this fact should not be
-forgotten. He was a wise man who said "You cannot, by passing an Act of
-Parliament, make a Vice into a Crime."
-
-It must, however, be remarked that the doctrine of degeneracy has lost
-both in force and in usefulness, by the treatment it has received at the
-hands of those who have constituted themselves its popular exponents.
-Some of these writers have made it but too evident that their criticisms
-are often captious, and that their definition of degeneracy includes all
-human failings--except their own. The reader who devotes a little
-attention to the subject will, however, readily find an explanation
-of this: for he will easily recognise, in the popular writers on
-Degeneracy, the characteristics of the Degenerate, as described by
-themselves.
-
-First, the choice of a disagreeable subject, when the whole field of
-science lay open to them: for the Degenerate prefers a disagreeable
-subject. Secondly, the almost universal discovery of causes of
-dissatisfaction, in every possible direction: for the Degenerate is
-always vexed with everybody--except himself. Again, the want of
-principle shown in appealing to the morbid tastes of the public,
-by laying before it information on disagreeable subjects: for the
-Degenerate is lacking in principle; what does it matter to him how much
-harm is done to weak minds by his writings, so long as he sees in such
-writings a safe means of securing eager readers and liberal pay? Again,
-the Degenerate seeks notoriety; and this is easily secured by writing
-books that discuss the morbid side of life.
-
-Above all, the habit of carrying the war of criticism into regions of
-art and culture with which the writer is obviously unfamiliar: this
-also marks the tendency of the writer's mind. To criticise the doing of
-that which he can by no means do; to destroy that which he can by no
-means make; to leave no margin of leniency in his judgment, for the
-imperfections which disfigure all human work: these are the familiar
-failings of youth, of the unripe mind. They are also those of the
-type of mind that never attains ripeness--of the Degenerate: we are
-forbidden, on high authority, to apply to our brethren a shorter and
-less modern term.
-
-But although the doctrine of Degeneracy has thus found its way to the
-general reader in a form which is often much to be regretted, it is
-nevertheless a doctrine which, if wisely used, may lead to the most
-beneficial results. Already it is widely recognised, by the thinkers of
-all nations, that the theory of degeneracy, when thoroughly understood,
-must revolutionise our treatment of the criminal classes. Instead of the
-attempt to punish, civilised legislation must eventually, in many cases,
-substitute a system of restraint.
-
-It is useless to try to reform the idler or the thief, whose instinct
-for idling or thieving is as imperative as a cat's instinct for catching
-mice. So long as he goes free, so long will the instinct reassert itself
-at every renewal of opportunity. Repeated punishment of the offender,
-who is powerless against his own impulses, is frequently a mere cruelty;
-while his repeated release, at the termination of every punitive
-sentence, is, on the other hand, still more certainly, a cruelty to the
-community at large, which he afflicts by his presence. Public opinion is
-gradually becoming awake to the necessity for fresh methods of dealing
-with these problems; it is by the patient investigations of scientific
-men that it has been enlightened.
-
-TABLE SHOWING THE PLACE OF MAN IN CLASSIFICATIONS
-
- =Grade IV.= TRIPLOBLASTIC Animals with a BODY-CAVITY.
-
- =Group.= CHORDATA; Animals with a Notochord.
-
- =Phylum.= VERTEBRATA; Animals with a Back-bone.
-
- =Class.= MAMMALIA; Animals that suckle the young.
-
- =Order.= Primates.
-
- =Genus.= Homo, i.e. man.
-
- _Species._ Sapiens (possessed of sense).
-
-Meanwhile, it must not be forgotten that the theory of degeneracy
-has its cheerful aspect. It enables us to look at the offending
-fellow-creature who belongs to the criminal classes, as an incomplete
-development rather than as a hardened sinner. It reminds us, too, that
-the criminal and the idler of to-day are now, what in the times of
-savagery and animalism, every man once was. The degenerate criminal, in
-fact, stands as a landmark, to point out the progress which has been
-made by the human race. This was the starting-point, where now he
-stands. How great the progress that is measured by the distance between
-him, and the orderly, kindly-hearted citizen of the present age!
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XVI
-
-HOW ZOOLOGISTS DO THEIR WORK
-
-
-It is one of the most well-worn of commonplace sayings, that "one half
-the world does not know how the other half lives." It is equally true
-that one half the world does not know how the other half works; and
-especially is this the case when one of the world's halves is its
-learned, and the other its unlearned, half. The average business man
-probably has an idea that the man of learning has a pretty easy time of
-it, and that his most arduous occupation is to enlighten an attentive
-world by reading papers at the meetings of the British Association
-and the Royal Society. He has a vague idea that the man of learning
-sometimes uses midnight oil, but it would surprise him to be informed
-that the man of learning often sets to work at five o'clock in the
-morning--as is actually the case. And well he may, considering the
-magnitude of the task he has in hand, and the variety of the odds and
-ends of labour that it includes.
-
-_Firstly_, how does he obtain the raw material for his work? The
-scientist, like the cook, must "first catch his hare" before any further
-details of work can be arranged. He does not, as a rule, do this in
-person, except when an animal of unusual interest is concerned. An army
-of collectors, all the world over, are constantly busy in searching for
-material for the zoologists, on land and sea. They look for employment
-and pay to the museums and laboratories of the learned world. When the
-specimens arrive, what is to be done with them? Some arrive alive, and
-may be dismissed from present consideration. The dead specimens give
-employment to a number of workers who are under the command of the man
-of learning. There are skins to be mounted and stuffed, bones to be
-articulated and set up, each practically the work of a different trade.
-There are drawings to be made of all important specimens, a task which
-affords employment for the artist and the photographer. There are
-carcases large and small, to be immersed in preservative fluids until
-they can be thoroughly examined in detail. And woe betide the zoologist
-who allows any of these tasks to be performed without his own personal
-supervision. He will realise, as all careless masters do, that blunders
-may be made in an hour, which cannot be repaired in a day. But when all
-is done that servants and helpers can accomplish, the real business
-remains to be done. Is there among the specimens one which has not been
-thoroughly overhauled by other writers, one whose every detail of
-structure is not already to be found printed in a book? That one must
-be examined with the utmost accuracy. If it is big enough, it must
-be dissected, and every part recorded and figured in diagrams. But
-suppose it is a small creature, whose parts can only be seen under the
-microscope, a long series of processes are necessary before it is ready
-for use. In its fresh state, it contains a quantity of water, and if
-left to itself would shortly decompose. Even if already immersed during
-carriage in various preservative fluids, it still contains much water,
-and, if so, neither will it keep for an indefinite length of time, nor
-could it be satisfactorily examined under the microscope. It must be
-soaked in one of various chemical solutions, to harden and preserve
-it. If very small indeed, a mere speck, it perhaps only needs to be
-transferred to a fluid in which it can be "mounted" and placed under the
-microscope. But with the vast majority of specimens, an immense amount
-of labour is needed before they are ready for inspection under the
-microscope.
-
-This will easily be understood if we reflect for a moment on the way in
-which objects are examined under the microscope. For purposes of
-scientific investigation, they are rarely looked at under light that
-falls upon their surfaces, that is to say, by reflected light; for this
-method can show nothing but details which are external and comparatively
-unimportant. They are seen by light placed behind them so as to shine
-through them, _i.e._ by transmitted light. If the object is not
-extremely thin, it will shut out too much light, and thus it cannot be
-clearly seen, therefore all objects, except the most minute, must be
-divided into thin slices, technically known as "sections."
-
-If we want to know not only the microscopic structure of organs, but
-also their shape and position in the body, and their relations with
-other parts, we must have every successive section carefully preserved,
-and the whole row arranged in correct successive order; the physiologist
-may often content himself with single sections; the zoologist must have
-rows and rows of them. What a task this was, a quarter of a century ago,
-for scientists who cut their sections by hand!
-
-Let us, however, describe first the way in which objects are prepared
-for section-cutting--whether by hand or by machine. It has already
-been noticed that animal substances contain a quantity of water, and
-therefore will not keep. The same circumstance renders them soft and
-squashy, so that the sharpest razor in the world, in cutting a section,
-must necessarily do more or less damage to the structure of the delicate
-tissues. The water is held in the meshes of the tissues just as it is
-held, for example, in the meshes of a sponge. Now, if we were dealing
-with the sponge, we could get it to absorb any other fluid substance
-besides water; we might choose one that would prevent decomposition; we
-might choose one that would go harder by cooling; so as to change the
-sponge into a strong solid block that could be knocked about without
-sustaining any damage. This is exactly what we must do with our animal
-tissue to prepare it for section-cutting; and the most convenient fluid
-for the purpose is melted wax. But whereas we might take our sponge
-out of water, squeeze it dry, and dip it straight into melted wax, we
-can by no means do so with our animal tissues. For one thing they
-usually cannot be squeezed, and where they can, they would of course be
-irretrievably ruined by such a rough process. Even the transference of
-the specimen from one fluid to another of very different qualities and
-density, would deface the tissues. Cells would burst, or be squeezed out
-of shape, and organs would be loosed from their right position by the
-currents set up in all parts of the specimen, under such circumstances.
-We must, therefore, try to get rid of the water by degrees. This may be
-done by gradually adding alcohol, a fluid which may be diluted with
-water in any proportion. We begin with a comparatively weak solution of
-alcohol, say about fifty per cent., and immerse the specimen in this for
-some little time. The time required depends somewhat upon the size of
-the specimen; if a large one, a new fluid will take longer to filter
-through it. Then we must change this solution of alcohol for stronger
-ones, say seventy per cent. and ninety per cent. successively, and
-finally to absolute alcohol. By this time the alcohol will have removed
-almost nearly all trace of water from the specimen. The latter is now
-nearly but not quite ready to be imbedded in melted wax; but first we
-must soak it for a while in a fluid intermediate in thickness between
-the alcohol and the wax, and capable of mixing in a friendly manner with
-both. Then it goes into a bath of melted wax, and is kept for hours at a
-stated temperature until the wax permeates it thoroughly. Then the
-melted wax and the specimen along with it is poured into a little mould
-and left to cool. The block of wax containing the specimen is cut down
-to a quadrangular shape, and is now ready for section cutting. In old
-days the block was placed in a stand, and successive sections were cut
-from it by hand with a razor. But this process is much too slow for
-modern days. Machines called microtomes (_i.e._ cutters of small parts)
-have been invented, and of these there are several kinds--in all,
-however, the razor is worked by machine and not by hand, so as to secure
-steadiness and a uniform thinness of the sections. The old microtomes
-threw off each section separately; but now matters are so arranged that
-the wax of each section adheres to that of the next, and the whole
-series of sections forms a continuous ribbon of thin wax. A large
-specimen, affording a number of sections, thus results in a ribbon of
-considerable length. Further processes are now required to fit the
-sections for the microscope. The ribbon must be divided into successive
-pieces of a length determined by that of the slides to be used. These
-are mounted in order on the slides, steps are taken to melt away the
-wax from the sections, the latter are covered with Canada Balsam
-surmounted by a glass cover slip, and left for some time to dry. After
-this they are ready for examination, and it is only now that the work
-really begins. All that has gone before is mere handicraft; it is time
-now for science to be called into play.
-
-[Illustration: FIG. 47.--Sections of Embryo Chick, eight days old. A
-slide mounted for microscopic examination, showing sections arranged in
-ribbons.]
-
-The sections must be compared with others of the same kind which have
-been cut before. Do they entirely resemble these, or is there a
-difference somewhere? Happy the man who finds that his sections
-represent a fresh stage, perhaps older or younger than any that has been
-seen before in the history of the particular animal which is under
-investigation. Happier still the man who has succeeded in getting hold
-of an animal which has not been described before. He will make haste to
-write a full description of it, illustrated by drawings; to found a new
-theory on it, if that can possibly be done; and to publish it to the
-world. It will go all over the globe. To every country in Europe; to the
-centres of learning in the United States; to universities in New Zealand
-and Australia, and our other colonies; and perhaps even to "Far Japan."
-
-When in his turn he receives publications from all countries, written in
-all languages, he is in a position to realise the very great advantage
-(referred to in an earlier page, p. 31) that results from the use of the
-learned tongues, in the terminology of zoological science. For the
-educated classes in all countries are equally acquainted with these; and
-when half of a sentence consists of words of Greek or Latin derivation,
-the labour of translation from a foreign tongue is necessarily greatly
-lightened. To no writer is this advantage of so great importance as to
-the Englishman, who is usually less familiar with the tongues of other
-nations than his colleagues abroad. It will easily be understood that in
-the world of zoology, there is no "predominance of the English-speaking
-races." Far from it. German is the language which supplies the fullest
-literature of every scientific subject; and in England even our
-text-books are, for the most part, translated from the German. German,
-in short, is to the seeker after Knowledge, what English is to the
-seeker after Money.
-
-Let us now pause a moment to consider how large a number of different
-industries profit by the labour of the zoologist. First there is the
-shipping trade; for, of course, all specimens from foreign lands are
-brought by sea. The chemist supplies preservative substances, and
-reagents used in the preparation of objects for the microscope. The
-construction of microscopes is a profession in itself, and one which
-employs many industries; for the making of a microscope includes not
-only the work of the optician, but also that of the artificer in brass,
-and of many other handicraftsmen. The glass-worker supplies "slides,"
-that is to say, the thin pieces of glass upon which objects for the
-microscope are placed, and "cover-slips," the little sheets of thinner
-glass which are laid over them; and, besides these, the bottles in which
-specimens are placed. Then comes the microtome, already spoken of, by
-means of which sections for the microscope are cut; how many skilled
-workmen have been engaged in the construction of its parts! Sheffield,
-perhaps, has supplied the razor which it holds, as well as the
-instruments for the dissection of the larger zoological specimens. We
-have already spoken of the laboratory servants, and the
-bone-articulators and skin-stuffers, who are personally and directly
-employed by the zoologist; and of the artists and photographers who
-depict his specimens, or perhaps copy his drawings. We must add to the
-list of the zoologist's helpers, last, but not least, the printer who
-"sets" the learned treatise in which the final result of his work is
-usually embodied; and attendant on the work of the printer is that of
-the bookbinder. With the bookseller the zoologist has but little to do;
-the general public, even the reading public, has no knowledge whatever
-of the writings of the zoological specialist. They are addressed to his
-equals and co-workers, not to critics and reviewers. Their publication
-is provided for, not by the law of supply and demand, but by the funds
-of the learned societies and the universities. It is only occasionally
-that a writer arises who is able and willing, like Huxley or Darwin, to
-express himself in a book that the general public can read; and it is
-only after a lifetime of detailed work, such as is understood only by
-the specialist, that writers like these think it fitting to lay the
-results of their labour before outsiders.
-
-The librarian, finally, must not be forgotten, in making up our list of
-the zoologist's helpers. The preservation and cataloguing of zoological
-literature is obviously a task all the more important, because, as we
-have already stated, zoological writings are not regulated by the law of
-supply and demand. A very little paper, read to a very small meeting of
-a learned society, and wholly ignored by the world at large, may
-contain facts priceless to the world of science. It is on the accurate
-and painstaking work of the librarian, who preserves and catalogues
-small things as conscientiously as large ones, that we rely for the
-completeness of our record of zoological knowledge. Such work has at all
-times been carried on in the libraries of our universities; but at the
-present time there are in existence libraries specially devoted to
-zoological literature alone.
-
-The museum, again, must not be forgotten, in which our man of learning
-stores his specimens, duly labelled and arranged. Here, again, is a
-staff of curators and sub-curators; and, under their direction, work for
-various workmen, and for perhaps even a humble charwoman to dust the
-shelves.
-
-Turn now to another aspect of the zoologist's work--that of teaching. We
-should think it very wrong to turn men loose on the world to practise in
-the professions of law or medicine without a long and careful training
-to fit them for their task. No less impossible is it for anyone to
-become a man of science without a similar training; for the profession
-of the man of science, whether zoologist, chemist, botanist, or expert
-in whatever branch, if defined in plain English, is the profession of
-seeking after knowledge of the order of things in which we live; and
-what profession can be more important to the world than this? To attain
-a scientific degree of any value, years of study are therefore required,
-and a series of examinations tests--or is supposed to test--the success
-of the student. Both the work of teaching and the work of examining must
-be the tasks of the scientist who has attained a position of eminence
-in the world of learning. The preparation of lectures, with their
-accompanying illustrations of diagrams and lantern slides: the guiding
-of classes engaged in the actual work of making acquaintance with animal
-specimens--these are the labours of the great man who is at the head of
-things. His task is carried out with the aid of junior helpers of his
-own profession--the demonstrators, who "point out" detail after detail
-of the work described in the lectures. Another helper, more esteemed by
-the students than by the professor who teaches them, is the "coach" who
-prepares them directly for their examinations. His aid, in the shape of
-extra teaching, given at the last moment, will often secure for the
-careless and inattentive pupil, better success than is the lot of the
-painstaking and industrious one, who cannot afford to pay extra fees.
-
-Few, however, of all the many pupils who crowd the lecture room of the
-zoologist, will ever become zoologists themselves. A vast proportion of
-them are students of medicine, of whom some knowledge of the subject is
-required. Others are preparing to be schoolmasters or schoolmistresses,
-and seek just such an amount of knowledge as they expect to find useful
-in teaching pupils of their own. To the students who are preparing to be
-doctors or teachers, circumstances often assign a limit--"thus far and
-no farther"--when they would fain bring their knowledge to a higher
-standard. But the time they have spent already has not been wasted. How
-keen an observer of animal life is the country doctor! How often,
-isolated from the world of learning, and ill-provided with books, he
-finds in this his chief recreation! As for the schoolmaster, how is the
-routine of school-work relaxed, and labour changed into pleasure, when
-he lets his boys exchange grammar and Euclid for zoology, and the
-lessons of the schoolroom for lessons in the fields!
-
-The most important part, however, of a zoologist's work is not the
-giving of instruction, but the labour of original research, to which we
-have already alluded; not the mere communication of information, but the
-task of adding to the general store of knowledge; not teaching, but
-discovery. The work of the man of science is, in fact, within the limits
-of his own department, the work of seeking after truth.
-
-
-
-
-INDEX
-
-
- A.
-
- Acoelomata, 37.
- Adaptation, 13.
- Alternation of Generations, 57, 137.
- Amoeba, 35, 45.
- Amphibia, 152-154.
- Ancestors, 40, 42.
- Animalcule (minute animal), 49.
- Anisopleura, 29.
- Annelids, 72.
- Annulosa, 69.
- Ants, 92.
- Appendages, 77.
- Arachnida (spiders), 84.
- Arthropoda, 33, 76.
- Ascidians, 33, 44, 135.
- Asexual reproduction, 55.
- Atavistic variation, 27.
- Azygo-branchiata, 29.
-
-
- B.
-
- Balanoglossus, 133, 143.
- Barnacles, 79, 80.
- Bees, 91.
- Beetles, 95.
- Bell Animalcule, 49.
- Birds, 156.
- Bivalve shell-fish, 23, 27, 107.
- Body-cavity, 34, 37, 38.
- Body-cavity (diagrams), 38, 139.
- Body-rings, or "segments," 69.
- Brachiopoda, 33, 43, 44, 117.
- Bryozoa, 33, 44, 119.
- Buds, 55.
- Butterflies, 89, 93.
-
-
- C.
-
- Cat, fur of black, 160.
- Cell, 11.
- Cell-types, 49.
- Cephalodiscus, 145.
- Cephalopoda, 113.
- Centipedes, 77.
- Chætopoda, 71.
- Chalk, 46.
- Chordata, 33, 44, 135, 143-146.
- Cilia, 42, 43, 48, 65.
- Classes, 33.
- Classification, 30.
- Classification, tables of, 30, 44, 52, 62, 67, 75, 116, 118,
- 121, 134, 146, 164, 179.
- Coelenterata, 33, 44, 53.
- Coelomata, 37, 44.
- Cockle, 111.
- Colony, 57.
- Corals, 59.
- Corallines, 56, 58.
- Corticata (or Infusoria), 47.
- Crabs, 81.
- Crocodile, 11.
- Crustacea, 78-83.
- Ctenophora, 60, 62.
-
-
- D.
-
- Degeneracy, 28, 172-180.
- Development by metamorphosis (change of form), 41, 89.
- Development, direct, 45.
- Dicyemidæ, 34.
- Diploblastic (two-layered), 34, 36.
- Diploblastic larva, 41.
- Duck-mole, 160.
-
-
- E.
-
- Earthworm, 74.
- Earthworm, diagrammatic section of, to show position of body-cavity, 38.
- Echinodermata, 33, 43, 44, 122.
- Ectoderm, outer or skin-layer of adult animals and larvæ
- (corresponding with the epiblast of embryos in the egg),
- 34, 37, 41, 139.
- Eleutheroblasteæ (hydroid animals which throw off "free buds"), 56.
- Embryology, 45.
- Encrinites, 131.
- Endoderm, inner or digestive layer of adult animals and larvæ
- (corresponding with the hypoblast of embryos in the egg),
- 37, 41, 139.
- Enteron, 36.
- Environment, 26.
- Errantia, or Wandering Annelids, 72.
- Euthyneura, 100.
-
-
- F.
-
- Families, 33.
- Fertility, 32.
- Feathers, 157.
- Feather-stars, 132.
- Fishes, 150-152.
- Flagella, 65.
- Flat-fish, 23.
- Foraminifera, 46.
- Frogs, 38, 152.
-
-
- G.
-
- Galeodes, a spider-like animal, 85, 86.
- Gasteropoda, 29, 98-107.
- Gasteropoda, classification of, 29.
- Gastræa, 40.
- Gastrula, larva, 41, 150.
- Genus, 32.
- Gills, 45, 141, 149.
- Grades, 34, 35-38.
- Gregarina, 49.
-
-
- H.
-
- Heliozoa, 48.
- Hemichordata (or Adelochorda), 33, 43, 145.
- Hermit Crabs, 80.
- Holostomata, 105.
- Hybrid, 32.
- Hydra, 36, 41, 54, 59.
-
-
- I.
-
- Infusoria 10, 47.
- "Infusorial earth," 47.
- Insects, true, 88-97.
-
-
- J.
-
- Jelly-fish, 57, 58.
-
-
- K.
-
- Kangaroo, 163.
-
-
- L.
-
- Lamellibranchiata, 107.
- Lamp-shells, 119.
- Land Animals, 166.
- Larvæ, larval forms, 40, 41.
- Larvæ of Brachiopods, 119.
- Larvæ of Insects, 90.
- Larvæ of Molluscs, 115.
- Lancelet (Amphioxus), 41, 140, 149.
- Leeches, 71.
- Limpet, Common, 17, 19, 20, 29, 30.
- Limpet, Semi-transparent, 15-20.
- Liver-fluke, 71.
- Lobsters, 80.
- Lophophore, 117, 122.
- Lustre, metallic, of feathers, 157.
-
-
- M.
-
- Mammalia, 160.
- Man, 13, 26, 167-180.
- Mantle (of bivalve molluscs), 108.
- Marsupialia (or Metatheria), 161.
- Marsupium or nursery-pocket, 161.
- Mesoblast, 38.
- Mesoderm or middle body-layer, 37, 61.
- Metameric symmetry, 70.
- Mesozoa, 35.
- Metazoa, 35.
- Microscope, 9, 10, 182.
- Microscope, Sections for the, 182.
- Microtome, 185.
- Mites, 87.
- Mollusca, 29.
- Mollusca (classification of Gasteropod), 29.
- Moths, 93.
- Monoblastic, 34.
- Moss-Corals, 33, 39, 119.
- Mule, 32.
- Mussel, Common, 103.
-
-
- N.
-
- Nematodes, 71.
- Notochord, 135, 139, 145, 149, 151.
- Nucleus, 35.
- Nummulite, 46.
-
-
- O.
-
- Odontophore, 100.
- Operculum (of univalve molluscs), 105.
- Opossum, 161.
- Orders, 33.
- Orthonectidae, 34.
-
-
- P.
-
- Pelecypoda, 107.
- Perforating gills (of vertebrates and other chordata), 142, 144.
- Peripatus, 88.
- Periwinkle, Common or Edible, 19, 26, 105.
- Periwinkle, High-tide-mark (_L. rudis_) 19, 105, 114.
- Periwinkle, Yellow, 19, 21, 23, 25, 30, 105.
- "Persons" of a colony, 58.
- Phoronis, 122.
- Phylum, pl. phyla, 33.
- Placophora, 113.
- Planarian Worms, 37, 70.
- Planula Larva, 41.
- Platyhelminthes, 44, 71.
- Polycystina, 47.
- Polyzoa, 119.
- Porifera, 33, 63, 68.
- Protective Coloration, 15, 25.
- Protophyta, 50.
- Protoplasm, 35.
- Prototheria, 161.
- Protozoa, 33, 44, 45.
- Pseudopodia, 36.
-
-
- R.
-
- Radial Symmetry, 53.
- Radiata, 53.
- Radiolarians, 47.
- Rainbow Worm, 72, 159.
- Reptiles, 154-156.
- Rhabdopleura, 145.
- Rhizopoda, 36, 46, 48.
- Rodent, Teeth of, 163.
- Rotifers, 76.
-
-
- S.
-
- Sand-hoppers, 83.
- Sauropsida, 154.
- Scales of fish, 142, 143.
- Scallop, 107-112.
- Scorpion, 87, 88.
- Sex, 10.
- Sea-Anemone, 54, 59.
- Sea-Cucumbers, 129, 130.
- Sea-Fan, 59.
- Sea-Mats, 119.
- Sea-Mouse, 72, 159.
- Sea-Urchins, 23, 33, 122.
- Shell-fish, 33.
- Siphonostomata, 102, 106.
- Skin of Vertebrates, 142.
- Snail, 98, 114.
- Snake-Stars, or Brittle-Stars, 128.
- Species, 30.
- Spiders, 84.
- Spiny Ant-eater, 160.
- Sponges, 33, 44, 63, 68.
- Sponges, Parasitic, 68.
- Starfishes, 127.
- Streptoneura, 29, 100.
- Symbiosis, 48.
-
-
- T.
-
- Teeth, 147, 163.
- Tentacles (arms or feelers), 54.
- Ticks, 87.
- Trichina, 71.
- Triploblastic (three-layered), 37.
- Trochophora, 43.
- Trochosphere larva, 42, 43, 72.
- Tubicolous (tube-dwelling) Annelids, 72, 74.
- Tunicata, 33, 44, 135.
- Turbellaria, 70.
- Two-layered animals, 34, 36.
-
-
- U.
-
- Unicellular animals, 11, 34, 35, 39, 44.
- Univalve shell-fish, 98.
- Urochordata, 145.
-
-
- V.
-
- Vacuole, contractile, 35.
- Variation, 24, 26, 28, 32.
- Varieties, 29.
- Vermes, 33, 44, 68.
- Vertebrae (joints of the backbone), 138, 139.
- Vertebrata, 33, 44, 138.
-
-
- W.
-
- Water Animals, 166.
- Wheel-ball larva, 42, 43.
- White ants, 93.
- Wood-lice, 83.
- Worms, 33, 44, 68.
-
-
- Z.
-
- Zooids, 58.
- Zoologists (_see below_).
- Zoophyte, 53.
- Zygobranchiata, 30.
- Zoologists, names of--
- Buffon, 11.
- Caldwell, 160.
- Chamisso, 137.
- Cuvier, 54.
- Darwin, 24, 76.
- Dubois, Eugène, 168.
- Forbes, 17.
- Gadow, 157.
- Gosse, P., 54.
- Grant, Robert, 65.
- Hæckel, 40, 168.
- Hertwig, O., 50.
- Huxley, 37, 78, 136, 154.
- Kowalevsky, 136.
- Landsborough, W., 109.
- Lang, A., 39.
- Linnaeus, 32, 68.
- Leuckart, 71.
- Morgan, Lloyd, 20.
- Parker, T. J., 32.
- Roberts, G., 21.
- Romanes, G. J., 11.
- Sharp, D., 92.
- Sollas, 65.
- Woodward, 109.
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber's Note:
-
-Obvious typographical errors have been corrected. Original published
-spelling and hyphenation have been retained as they appear in the
-original publication, including "debateable" and "cellless". A possible
-missing "wall" has not been added to the caption for Fig. 5 ("--muscular
-of intestine"; and reference to "the Italian poet" on Page 138 of the
-original publication has been preserved. Where figures or tables cut
-paragraphs, they were moved above or below the paragraph.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-End of Project Gutenberg's Stories of the Universe: Animal Life, by B. Lindsay
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK STORIES OF THE UNIVERSE: ***
-
-***** This file should be named 40362-8.txt or 40362-8.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/4/0/3/6/40362/
-
-Produced by Robert Baruch, Tom Cosmas and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
-will be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
-one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
-(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
-permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
-set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
-copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
-protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
-Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
-charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
-do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
-rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
-such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
-research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
-practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
-subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
-redistribution.
-
-
-
-*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
-http://gutenberg.org/license).
-
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
-all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
-If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
-terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
-entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
-and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
-or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
-collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
-individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
-located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
-copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
-works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
-are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
-Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
-freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
-this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
-the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
-keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
-a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
-the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
-before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
-creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
-Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
-the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
-States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
-access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
-whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
-copied or distributed:
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
-from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
-posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
-and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
-or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
-with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
-work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
-through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
-Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
-1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
-terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
-to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
-permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
-word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
-distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
-"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
-posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
-you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
-copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
-request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
-form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
-that
-
-- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
- owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
- has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
- Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
- must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
- prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
- returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
- sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
- address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
- the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or
- destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
- and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
- Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
- money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
- of receipt of the work.
-
-- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
-forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
-both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
-Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
-Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
-collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
-"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
-corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
-property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
-computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
-your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
-your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
-the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
-refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
-providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
-receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
-is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
-opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
-WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
-WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
-If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
-law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
-interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
-the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
-provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
-with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
-promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
-harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
-that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
-or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
-work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
-Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
-
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
-including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
-because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
-people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
-To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
-and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
-Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
-http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
-permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
-Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
-throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
-809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
-business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
-information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
-page at http://pglaf.org
-
-For additional contact information:
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
-SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
-particular state visit http://pglaf.org
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
-To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
-
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
-with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
-Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
-
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
-unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
-keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
-
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
-
- http://www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.