summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/40234.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org>2025-03-09 00:14:42 -0800
committernfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org>2025-03-09 00:14:42 -0800
commit399e985d7d08883f2502021f811c7ba67167e6b7 (patch)
tree3910cc4a53eca3382c926cddb657b7723a70a506 /40234.txt
parentd2dd73f3a4c1826e5767efdf6c09836a0efe58a4 (diff)
Add files from ibiblio as of 2025-03-09 00:14:42HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to '40234.txt')
-rw-r--r--40234.txt2805
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2805 deletions
diff --git a/40234.txt b/40234.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 41987c1..0000000
--- a/40234.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2805 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Early Introduction of Bogus Freemasonry
-in the United States of America and Texas Among Colored Masons, by Charles L. Mitchell
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-
-Title: The Early Introduction of Bogus Freemasonry in the United States of America and Texas Among Colored Masons
-
-Author: Charles L. Mitchell
-
-Release Date: July 14, 2012 [EBook #40234]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: ASCII
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EARLY INTRODUCTION OF ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Bryan Ness and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- THE EARLY INTRODUCTION OF
-
- BOGUS FREEMASONRY
- IN THE
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- AND TEXAS
- AMONG COLORED MASONS
-
- Copyrighted February 23, 1909, by Chas. L. Mitchell
- San Antonio, Texas
-
- PRICE 25 CENTS
-
-
- Complied by
- C. L. MITCHELL, 33 deg.
- Grand Master of M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge A. F. & A. M.
- of Texas
-
- And Grand Auditor General H. E. of the United Supreme Council
- of A. A. Scottish Rites for the Southern and Western Masonic
- Jurisdiction of the United States of America
-
- THE ARMSTRONG CO. SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
-
-
-
-
-Preface
-
-
-In the pleasant labors of compiling this work I have been assisted by
-one of the brightest stars in the galaxy of brilliant meteors in the
-Masonic Firmament, to whom I heartily tender my grateful
-acknowledgements; hoping that the advantages anticipated may be fully
-realized by my brethren.
-
-In my effort to pull the Mask off of the Clandestine, self constituted
-Organization of Freemasonry Among Colored Men in the state of
-Massachusetts, under the supervision and control of the self
-styled--Illegitimate Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, And also
-the early introduction and the irregularity of Clandestine and Bogus
-Freemasonry in the State of Texas among Colored Men; I respectfully
-submit and dedicate the results of my efforts of this work to the Ill.
-John G. Jones, 33 deg. M. P. Sovereign Grand Commander of the United Supreme
-Council of A. A. S. Rites of the Southern and Western Masonic
-Jurisdiction of the United States, its Territories and Dependencies, and
-Imperial Grand Potentate of the Imperial Grand Council of the Ancient
-Arabic Order of Nobles of the Mystic Shrine of North and South America,
-also Grand Master of Masons of the State of Illinois.
-
- C. L. Mitchell, 33 deg., Grand Master,
- M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge,
- A. F. & A. M. of Texas and Masonic Jurisdiction.
-
-San Antonio, Texas.
-
-
-
-
-[Illustration
-
- C. L. MITCHELL, 33 deg.
- M. W. Grand Master
- M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge
- A. F. & A. M. Jurisdiction of Texas.
-
- Grand Auditor General, H. E.
- United Supreme Council, A. A. S. R.
- for the
- S. and W. Masonic Jurisdiction U. S. A.
- Grand Deputy of the Imperial Grand Council
- for the
- Ancient Arabic Order of Nobles of the Mystic Shrine
- For North and South America
- Grand Register General of the Order of the Red Cross
- of Constantine]
-
-
-
-
-ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF BOGUS FREEMASONRY AMONG COLORED MEN
-
-In the United States of America and Texas, From its Earliest
-Introduction
-
-
- San Antonio, Texas Dec 1, 1908
-
-In order that the members of the Masonic Fraternity may have a correct
-and thorough understanding about the origin and the irregularity of
-Freemasonry among Colored men in the state of Texas, it will be
-necessary to state the time and place that clandestine and spurious
-Freemasonry among Colored Men was instituted in the state of
-Massachusetts and also the establishing of that self constituted African
-Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Massachusetts which is now the Prince
-Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts for it was from that corrupt,
-notorious, bogus Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts whose record
-covers the very blackest page in masonic history that Freemasonry among
-Colored Men in the state of Texas first originated from. I am fully
-aware of the fact that when the truth is told about the actions and
-conduct of the leaders of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts
-which has been done from time to time their minds are inflamed to an
-extra ordinary degree of madness, hatred and dislike and they talk and
-write and say anything except the truth, and the truth they will never
-state except it is by accident on one hand and mistake on the other.
-
-
-
-
-FREEMASONRY AMONG COLORED MEN IN MASSACHUSETTS
-
-March 6, 1775
-
-
-1st question. Who were the Colored Men in the state of Massachusetts
-that have advertised themselves and who claimed to have been made Master
-Masons in a White Masonic Lodge in the state of Massachusetts. Can you
-state the time and place and under what circumstances they have asserted
-that it occurred?
-
-1st Answer. The Colored Men in the state of Massachusetts that have been
-advertised of having been made Master Masons, were Prince Hall, Boston
-Smith, Thomas Sanderson and two or three others. They have said and have
-tried to make someone believe that they were made Master Masons in a
-White Masonic Lodge that was called a Traveling Masonic Lodge and that
-it was connected with General Gages Military Regiment at Boston
-Massachusetts on the 6th of March 1775 and that this White Masonic Lodge
-in General Gages Military Regiment, they said, held a charter from the
-Grand Lodge of England, and replying to that unwarranted statement made
-and published by the leaders of the spurious Prince Hall Grand Lodge of
-Massachusetts, for the Grand Lodge of England has repeatedly said that
-they did not have any masonic lodge in General Gages Military Regiment
-when that regiment was in the United States and the question has time
-after time been asked the members of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of
-Massachusetts and particularly those in Massachusetts that claim to know
-so much about it to give the name and the number of that masonic lodge
-that Prince Hall, Boston Smith and Thomas Sanderson was made master
-masons in that was connected with General Gages Military Regiment which
-was then in the United States, and these wily fellows and Masonic
-intervators have never been able to give us any information as to what
-the name or even the number of this Masonic Lodge that they say was in
-General Gages Military Regiment. And inasmuch as no person has ever been
-found that could furnish any genuine information about this matter there
-is no doubt but the statements that have been paraded around the country
-about this matter were bare-faced, willful and malicious falsehoods, and
-in the absence of any proof to confirm their statements it is very safe
-to say that Prince Hall, Boston Smith, Thomas Sanderson and their
-associates simply went to bed at night and dreamed that they had been
-made Master Masons and got up next morning with their minds in a high
-state of hallucination and really thought it was so, when as a matter of
-fact there was nothing, nothing in it, and they simply drew on their
-imaginations.
-
-2nd question. What was the name of the first lodge of Colored Men who
-belonged to the Masonic fraternity in the state of Mass.?
-
-2nd Answer. The name of the first Colored Lodge of Masons in the state
-of Massachusetts was a lodge named African Lodge No. 459.
-
-3rd question. When was the first Grand Lodge of Colored Masons organized
-in the state of Mass.?
-
-3rd Answer. The name of the first Grand Lodge of Colored Masons that was
-organized in the state of Mass. was a Grand Lodge that was designated as
-African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Mass.
-
-4th question. How many lodges took part in the organization of African
-Grand Lodge of Modern Masons that was organized at Boston Mass. on the
-24th of June 1791?
-
-4th Answer. There was only one lodge that took part in the organization
-of African Grand Lodge of Masons of Mass. on the 24th of June 1791 at
-Boston Mass. when the Masonic law and landmarks of Freemasonry have said
-that in order to organize a regular Grand Lodge it requires not less
-than three warranted lodges, that has been the Masonic law both in this
-country and in Europe and has been followed and strictly adhered to by
-every well regulated and lawful Masonic Grand Lodge since the year of
-1717 down to the present day and not otherwise.
-
-5th question. What is meant by the words F. & A. M.?
-
-5th Answer. Free and Accepted Mason the words and title of Free and
-Accepted Mason is an innovation in Masonry and was adopted by Masons who
-did not wish to follow the early established custom rules and principles
-of the Masonic fraternity.
-
-6th question. What is meant by the words and title A. F. & A. M.?
-
-6th Answer. The words A. F. & A. M. means Ancient Free and Accepted
-Masons which words and title are of ancient origin and should be used
-and adopted by every well regulated Masonic subordinate lodge and Grand
-Lodge in this country. For it is in keeping with the early ancient
-Masonic laws rules and regulations of the Masonic fraternity.
-
-7th question. What is meant by the words and title of states rights,
-masons as you so often hear in the state of Texas by the masons who
-belong to the so-called Grand Lodge of Texas that J. W. McKinney is the
-Grand Master of and also the so-called Grand Lodge of the State of New
-York that one individual who goes by the name of Henry A. Spencer who
-advertises himself as being the Grand Master of the so-called Grand
-Lodge of Colored Masons of the state of New York which is a self
-constituted and bogus grand body?
-
-7th Answer. The best application and definition that can be given to
-those masons who call themselves state right masons is that they are no
-masons at all. For if a man is a legal and genuine mason he is a mason
-all over the world, and is to be recognized as a mason in every land and
-in every country, but the masons in the state of Texas that belong to
-the McKinney Grand Lodge in Texas and the self constituted Grand Lodge
-in the state of New York that Henry A. Spencer is at the head of they
-are not recognized all over the world and these being state institutions
-and the masons who belong in Texas and of New York are not recognized as
-legitimate masons in any part of the world.
-
-8th question. What is meant by the numbers of 3, 5 and 7?
-
-8th Answer. The fundamental numbers in Freemasonry are 3, 5 and 7, and
-of these, by far the most essential is the number 3. The three principal
-columns are Wisdom, Strength and Beauty, and a lodge is supported by
-them.
-
-The number "three" derived its significance in the early period of
-antiquity, and back in the ages of the earliest centuries, no court of
-law was legally organized unless three judges were present, and these
-tribunals perpetuated ancient temples worshipped frequently, if not
-invariably convened, under trees, in imitation of the Scandinavian ash.
-
-Seven threes were prescribed as the highest number. The judges were
-absolutely required to open and regularly hold a court of justice. The
-maximum was seven, and in some cases five were demanded to proceed in
-due form to adjudicate upon the matter brought before them. These
-practices in early days present a solution of the Masonic landmark that
-three or more members are necessary to open or close a Masonic lodge.
-
-9th question. What is meant by the word and title of A. F. & A. Y.
-Masons?
-
-9th Answer. A. F. & A. Y. Masons means Ancient, Free and Accepted York
-Masons, the city of York is in the north part of England it is
-celebrated for its traditional connection with Freemasonry in England.
-The first charter granted in England to the Masons as a body was by
-authority and power of King Athelstan, in the year of 926 at York,
-England and the application was made by Prince Edwin and Prince Edwin
-summoned all the Masons in England to meet him in congregation at the
-City of York, England and from this assemblage of Masons at York the
-letter "Y" originated. Prince Edwin was elected Grand Master of the
-Grand Lodge that was organized at York England in 926. From the
-commencement of 926 of the assembly of Masons at York the letter "Y"
-commenced, and has been known among members of the Masonic fraternity
-and at the establishing of the Grand Lodge at York, England in the year
-926 they adopted a constitution and general regulation for the craft.
-
-Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstan of England was an eminent
-and distinguished Mason and King Athelstan was the grandson of King
-Alfred the first anointed King of England who translated the Holy Bible
-into the Saxon language.
-
-The Grand Lodge that was established in York, England in 926 prospered
-and flourished. The City of York, England was the seat of Masonic
-government of the craft in England.
-
-
-
-
-THE MASK STRIPPED OFF OF THE CLANDESTINE SPURIOUS AND UNLAWFUL SELF
-CONSTITUTED ORGANIZATION OF FREEMASONRY
-
-Among Colored Men in the State of Massachusetts Under the Supervision
-and Control of the Self Styled Illegitimate Prince Hall Grand Lodge of
-Massachusetts Dissected and Exposed and is now in the Limelight of Day.
-
-
-The self styled Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Mass. and the Grand Lodges
-among Colored Masons that recognized them and affiliated with them have
-time after time published in their printed proceedings to the Masonic
-world that Freemasonry among Colored Men in the state of Mass. commenced
-at the time when Prince Hall, Boston Smith, Thomas Sanderson and their
-associates were made master masons that it was in a white lodge and that
-this White Masonic Lodge was connected with General Gages Military
-Regiment, and that this Military Regiment was at Boston Mass. March the
-6th 1775 and the Masonic Lodge that was claimed to be connected with
-General Gages Military Regiment holds its charter of power and authority
-from the Grand Lodge of England and they positively state in language
-that it is so plain that it cannot be misunderstood that Prince Hall,
-Boston Smith, Thomas Sanderson and their followers was made Master
-Masons on the 6th of March 1775 at Boston Mass. if any person has any
-doubt about the matter read the printed Masonic proceedings of the
-Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Mass. of 1875, 1876 and 1877 and the year of
-1903 and 1904. See the History of Freemasonry among Colored Men in the
-State of Mass. by the late Louis Hayden past Grand Master of the Prince
-Hall Grand Lodge of Mass. See the Grand Lodge proceedings of Illinois
-for the year of 1873, 1874 and 1875. See the Grand Lodge proceedings of
-Pennsylvania of 1865, 1872, and 1876. See the historical facts of
-Freemasonry among Colored Men in the United States published by J. M.
-Conna of Connecticut in the year of 1876. See the history of Freemasonry
-among Colored Men in the United States by W. H. Grimshaw of Washington
-D. C. 1903. These and many other Grand Lodges make the same statement.
-
-Now to show you that these ignoramuses and peddlers of Masonic falsehood
-did not even know or have the slightest conception of what they were
-talking about. They hastened to put their ignorant and prejudice
-imagination and conclusions into print which has been the cause and the
-means of bringing confusion among the craft.
-
-The records of the War department of the English Government show that
-General Gages Military Regiment was not in the United States of America
-and located at Boston Mass. in the year of 1772-1773 and in the middle
-part of the year of 1774. It appears from the record of the English War
-department that General Gages Military Regiment which was stationed at
-Boston Mass. was in the middle part of 1774 recalled to England and did
-not return back to the United States again. And a number of voluminous
-articles has on several occasions appeared in numerous American
-magazines by some of our American Military Generals relative to the
-occupation of British soldiers on American soil in the year of 1774,
-1775, 1776 and you will find that they do not mention or refer to the
-name of General Gages Military Regiment being present in Boston Mass. in
-the year 1775 at Boston Mass. but they do refer to General Gages
-Military Regiment being in the United States at Boston in the year of
-1772 and 1773 and the middle part of the year of 1774 and having been
-recalled by the English government. In the National Magazine of the
-month of June 1907 an article there appeared in that magazine relative
-to the withdrawal by the English War Department of General Gages
-Regiment from Massachusetts in the year of 1774.
-
-And upon further investigation of this matter we find that General Gages
-Military Regiment which Prince Hall, Boston Smith, Thomas Sanderson and
-their associates claim to have been made Master Masons on the 6th of
-March 1775 at Boston Mass. that General Gages Regiment was not in the
-United States at that time. This was published by a circular issued by
-James Barnett Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of New York. See the
-proceedings of the organization of the second Grand Lodge of Colored
-Masons Of the state of New York James Barnett in the year of 1848. See
-the circular letter of Jacob Francis Grand Secretary of the Grand Lodge
-of New York on Oct. 25th 1848, and they state the same thing that
-General Gages Military Regiment was not in the United States of America
-March the 6th 1775 and that being true how can it be possible that
-Prince Hall, Boston Smith, Thomas Sanderson and their associates could
-have been made Master Masons in a Lodge in General Gages Military
-Regiment on the 6th of March 1775 at Boston Mass. when General Gages
-Military Regiment was not in the United States of America. It shows
-conclusively that the introduction of Freemasonry in the State of Mass.
-among Colored Men was not only unlawful and a fraud and sham, but that
-the statements coming from those individuals from the State of Mass. was
-untruthful and unreliable and they simply told beyond all peradventure
-of a doubt, a bare-faced, wilful and malicious lie, and which had been
-manufactured for the very purpose of misleading and hoodwinking the
-Colored People of this country.
-
-I am satisfied that the claim put forth by the members of the spurious
-Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Mass. that Prince Hall and his associates
-claiming that they were made Master Masons in a Lodge in General Gages
-Military Regiment on March the 6th 1775 at Boston Mass. is a falsehood
-and a complete misrepresentation from beginning to end for there is not
-a particle of genuine documentary evidence that has ever been presented
-to sustain or reply upon anything that the followers and Members of the
-Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Mass. has ever said or written.
-
-
-AFRICAN GRAND LODGE OF MODERN MASONS OF MASSACHUSETTS ORGANIZED WITH
-ONLY ONE LODGE ON THE 24TH OF JUNE 1791 AT BOSTON MASS.
-
-The first Grand Lodge of Colored Masons in the State of Mass. was named
-African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Mass. and it was organized with
-only one Lodge and the name of that Lodge was African Lodge No. 459 this
-occurred on the 24th of June 1791 at Boston Mass. See the circular of
-the proceedings of the organization of African Grand Lodge of Modern
-Mason of Mass. organized June the 24th 1791 at Boston Mass. and signed
-by Prince Hall Grand Master and Prince Taylor Grand Secretary of the
-African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Mass. See the printed
-proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Illinois in 1867. See the printed
-proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Iowa when it was organized in the year
-of 1881 when John Page was elected Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of
-Colored Masons of the State of Iowa in 1881.
-
-See the circular and the Masonic proceedings issued by J. H. Hall Grand
-Secretary of the Grand Lodge of New Jersey in the year of 1873. See the
-proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee when Nelson McGavoc was
-Grand Master and Abraham Smith was Grand Secretary in the year of 1874.
-See the circular issued by the Grand Lodge of New York in 1874 when W.
-C. H. Curtis was Grand Master, and Albert Woodson was Grand Secretary.
-See the printed proceedings of the various sessions of the Grand Lodge
-of Mass. See the history of Freemasonry in the United States among
-Colored Men by J. N. Conna of Connecticut together with the Published
-statements of a number of other Grand Lodges and they all emphatically
-state and agree in language that is not uncertain, that the first Grand
-Lodge of Colored Masons organized in the State of Mass. was African
-Grand Lodge of Modern Masons which was organized with only one Lodge and
-that was on the 24th day of June 1791 at Boston Mass.
-
-There cannot be any doubt by any Masonic scholar or student in this day
-or time nor there can be any uncertainty in the manner by the officers
-and members of any well regulated and lawful Grand Lodge of Freemasonry
-in the whole world, but that the establishing of African Grand Lodge of
-Modern Masons of Mass. on the 24th of June 1791 with only one Lodge but
-that it is a clandestine spurious and irregular body for it has been
-since the year of 1717 that well established Masonic law of Freemasonry
-that it requires not less that three warranted Lodges to organize a
-regular Grand Lodge. The Masonic authorities on that proposition both in
-this country and Europe are uninformed and no Grand Lodge has ever been
-recognized as being a legal Grand Lodge that has been organized with a
-less number than three warranted lodges.
-
-
-The Name of the African Grand Lodge of Massachusetts was Changed to the
-Name of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Mass. in 1808.
-
-After the Death of Prince Hall which occurred in the year of 1807, at
-the session held in the year of 1808 the name of African Grand Lodge of
-Modern Masons of Massachusetts was changed to the name of Prince Hall
-Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Mass.
-
-Judging from the rapid and numerous changes of position as soon as a
-cloud appeared among the so-called bogus Masons and an spurious Grand
-Lodge of Mass. some of the Masonic writers and followers and members of
-the bogus Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Mass. when they where exposed and
-shown up and dislodged from one untenable position they have jumped from
-one position to another. On the 24th of June 1791 they called themselves
-Modern Masons, in 1847 they called themselves Compact Masons, in 1880
-they styled themselves as Free and Accepted Masons. We may expect at any
-time to hear of those Masonic imposters and shams of Mass, belonging to
-that notorious self constituted Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Mass. giving
-themselves another title and name at any time.
-
- London England
- Freemasonry Hall
- Office of the Grand Sec.
-
- London England, May 10, 1874.
-
- To John G. Jones, Esq.,
- Grand Secretary,
- Dear Sir and Bro:--
-
- On the 27th of December of 1873 I addressed you a letter which I
- hope will reach you in due time giving you the information that you
- seek concerning a Lodge that was said to have belonged to the Grand
- Lodge of England in General Gages Military Regiment that was in the
- United States of America. As I stated to you in my former letter
- that there was no Masonic Lodge in General Gages Military Regiment
- in the United States and I beg to state to you and the brethren in
- your country as to a provincial Grand Master by the Grand Lodge of
- England. Any person having such papers claiming to be such is a
- fraud. I enclose you a copy of a letter that I addressed to Mr. B.
- F. Rogers of Springfield Ill., who is Grand Master of your State.
-
- I trust this will supply you with all the information that you
- desire.
-
- Yours Fraternally,
- John Hervey,
- Grand Sec'y.
-
-
- London England,
- Freemason Hall
- Office of the Grand Sec.
-
- London England, May 4th, 1875.
-
- Mr. B. F. Rogers,
- Grand Master of Masons of the State of Ill.
-
- My very Dear Sir and Bro:--
-
- Your letter was received. I take pleasure in stating to you that in
- the latter part of December 1873 I forwarded a letter to Bro. John
- G. Jones of Chicago who is Grand Secretary of your Grand Lodge in
- which I gave him the information that you now desire. I now beg to
- say to you that the Grand Lodge of England never had any Masonic
- Lodge in General Gages Military Regiment whose occupation was in the
- United States at the time that you mentioned nor has our Grand Lodge
- any record of any such appointment as Prince Hall to be Provincial
- Grand Master in the United States. If any such appointment is
- presented and claims to have been made by the Grand Lodge of England
- you are at liberty to deny it, and give the same information if you
- wish to the craft in the United States as we do not wish our Grand
- Lodge to be misrepresented.
-
- Yours fraternally,
- John Hervey,
- Grand Sec'y.
-
-
- Lawyer John G. Jones 33,
- Sov. Grand Commander,
-
- Paris, France, Nov. 4th. 1907.
-
- Illustrious Sir and Bro: Your letter reached me on yesterday and
- many thanks. You will kindly remember me to all brethren in Chicago.
- I like America better than I do this country, or the places that I
- have been in since I left Chicago probably that is owing to the fact
- that having been born and reared in Chicago I feel more at home. But
- the French people, and particularly those that are members of
- Masonic fraternity, are very pleasant and kind. I visited one Lodge
- last night and last week I visited the consistory of the Ancient
- Accepted Scottish Rite. Before you are admitted in any of the
- Masonic bodies, here you are required to stand a very rigid
- examination, you know about what that is. There is no prejudice in
- this section of the country against man because he may be of a dark
- complexion, in all of my travels the Masonic body of which you are
- the head of in America among colored Masons is the only one that is
- known and recognized in this part of the country where I have been.
- We will go to London, England, next week. I will write you when I
- get there.
-
- Yours Fraternally, H. S. COLLINS, 33,
-
-
- London, England, Nov. 28th. 1907.
- Illustrious John G. Jones, 33,
- Grand Master of Masons of Illinois.
-
- Very Dear Brother--We arrived here last week and will remain here
- probably for a month. Will you kindly see Bro. Geo. Standwood, the
- Secretary of Chicago Lodge No. 5, and pay him my dues to the Lodge?
- We will be in Chicago the latter part of February, 1908. I have much
- to tell you when I get home. I visited the Masonic Lodges since I
- have been here and was treated with the utmost courtesy. The diploma
- from my Lodge and Consistory that you signed has been a great
- service and benefit to me. I hear your name quite highly spoken of
- by the members of the Masonic Fraternity this side of the Atlantic
- ocean. The Lodges and Masons that you are connected with in America
- among colored Masons are the only ones that are recognized over
- here.
-
- Yours Fraternally, H. S. COLLINS, 33.
-
-
-CAN ONE MASONIC LODGE ASSUME THE FUNCTION OF A GRAND LODGE?
-
-Some one might ask the question can only one lodge assume the functions
-of a Grand Lodge? The answer to that must be emphatically No, and
-whatever Lodge assumes the functions of a Grand Lodge then such Grand
-Lodge is unlawful and irregular. See Mackey's Masonic Jurisprudence, see
-Mitchell's Authority on Masonic Law, see Chase and Preston on Masonic
-Law and they all agree that one Lodge cannot assume the function of a
-Grand Lodge.
-
-
-BOGUS PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE OF MASSACHUSETTS NEVER HAS BEEN HEALED.
-
-In order to place the matter before the Masonic fraternity some one
-might inquire and ask the question that since the time that African
-Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Massachusetts was organized with only
-one Lodge. On the 24th of June. 1791, which is now the Prince Hall Grand
-Lodge of Massachusetts have they ever been healed and legally
-Masonically set right? The answer to that is that they have not and only
-a short time ago they admitted by saying that they had never been
-healed, and Masonically set right, and that being true they were
-established in an unlawful manner and are clandestine and irregular
-Masons to this very day, and I challenge them to present any proof to
-the contrary.
-
-
-CAN A SUBORDINATE LODGE GRANT A LICENSE OR CHARTER TO ORGANIZE ANOTHER
-LODGE? THEY CANNOT.
-
-In order to justify the irregular and unlawful Masonic work that has
-been done in the State of Massachusetts by the Colored men who belong to
-the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts they attempt to justify
-their actions by saying that it was legal and lawful for African Lodge
-No. 459 to grant a license or charter to organize another Lodge and they
-have published in a circular of two cases of that kind that occurred in
-the year 1625. I have taken particular pains to thoroughly investigate
-the cases that they referred to and no such actions of that kind was
-ever done by any Masonic Lodge in the places that they referred to. All
-the Masonic authorities, both in this country and Europe, have made it
-plain how a Masonic Lodge could be organized and it must be done by the
-authority of a Grand Lodge. No intelligent Mason and no genuine and
-regular Mason, either Black or White, in the whole world, can find any
-authority or precedent where one Subordinate Lodge can grant a charter
-to another Subordinate Lodge.
-
-
- The Following Excerpt of a Letter From Ill. John G. Jones, of
- Chicago, Ill., Relative to Law Suit Pending in the District of
- Columbia Between the Old Compact Grand Lodge of the District of
- Columbia and the Legitimate Grand Lodge A. F. & A. Masons of
- Which Bro. H. C. Scott is Grand Master Shows That the Question
- at Issue is Purely a Local Matter and Does Not in Any Way Affect
- Any Other Grand Lodges in This Country and Shows Conclusively
- That the Claims Made by W. H. Grimshaw Amount to Nothing.
-
- Chicago. Ill., Dec. 2, 1908.
-
- Bro. Charles L. Mitchell, 33, Grand Master.
-
- The law suit between the two Grand Lodges in the District of
- Columbia is as follows:
-
- The Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia that Bro. H. C.
- Scott is the Grand Master of, over two years ago commenced a
- law suit against the old Compact Grand Lodge in the District
- of Columbia to prohibit them from using the word "ancient"
- the old Compact Grand Lodge in the District of Columbia
- filed a cross bill and saying that they were the first Grand
- Lodge in the District of Columbia to use the word "ancient"
- and Judge Wright of the Equity Court in giving his opinion
- rules and held that the old Compact Grand Lodge of the
- District of Columbia was entitled to use the word "ancient"
- and enjoined the Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia
- that Bro. H. C. Scott is the Grand Master of from using the
- word "ancient" and Bro. Scott and his Grand Lodge has
- appealed the case to the Court of Appeals in the District of
- Columbia where they can get justice in the matter. The law
- suit is a local matter between the two Grand Lodges In the
- District of Columbia which does not in the least or in any
- manner whatever affect any other Grand Lodge in this country
- and does not alter or affect the Masonic legal status of the
- Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia that Bro. H. C.
- Scott is the Grand Master of except using the word "ancient"
- of which I am satisfied that the higher court will reverse
- the decision of Judge Wright in the matter.
-
-
-
-
-PRINCE HALL AND HIS ASSOCIATES MADE MASONS WITHOUT ANY CHARTER OR
-AUTHORITY.
-
-According to the statements made and published by the Prince Hall Grand
-Lodge of Massachusetts, that from March the 16th, 1775 to 1787, that
-African Lodge had no charter of any kind, and still in the face of all
-of that we find that Prince Hall, Boston Smith, Thomas Sanderson of
-Massachusetts, conferred the degrees of Free Masonry upon certain men
-without any charter or without any authority whatever and still they
-wish to call themselves regular Masons.
-
-
-CLANDESTINE, SPURIOUS AND UNLAWFUL NATIONAL COMPACT GRAND LODGE OF
-MASONS OF NORTH AMERICA THAT WAS ORGANIZED AT BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, ON
-THE 24th OF JUNE, 1847.
-
-For many years past a great deal has been said and written about the
-establishing of the Irregular and Illegitimate National Compact Grand
-Lodge of Masons that was organized without a shadow of Masonic power and
-authority in 1847 at Boston, Massachusetts and of all of the absurd and
-ridiculous ideas which have ever incorporated itself in the minds of any
-man who is a Mason there seems nothing so utterly weak and imbecile as
-the doctrine that is advocated by the followers and adherents of that
-Clandestine National Compact Grand Lodge which was founded upon
-everything that was irregular and clandestine and predicated upon
-fiction fables and falsehoods, these and nothing else.
-
-The numerous statements that have been made and are being made now by
-the exponents of the National Compact Grand Lodge purporting to be
-genuine and historical, are solely unreliable and cunning inventions of
-their own devised for the purpose of misleading the people.
-
-On the 24th of June, 1847, at Boston, Mass., John T. Hilton, Grand
-Master, Henry Harris, William Bruce, of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of
-Massachusetts, and James Bird, John G. Bias, James Richmond, of the
-African Grand Lodge of North America, with its headquarters at
-Philadelphia, Pa., and the Hiram Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania,
-represented by James Newman, John Anderson, Samuel Brackles, Phillip
-Buckhammond and several others from the Hiram Grand Lodge of
-Pennsylvania, and from the Boyer Grand Lodge of New York was William H.
-Clark, Lewis Hayden, Alexander Elston, together with several others, met
-in Boston, Mass., and organized the National Compact Grand Lodge of
-North America. They elected John T. Hilton, of Boston, Mass., National
-Grand Master, and William E. Ambush was elected National Grand
-Secretary. This National Compact Grand Lodge of North America has done
-nothing but breed dissension among Colored Masons in the United States.
-
-From its earliest period of existence down to the present date, and it
-has never been recognized as a regular and legal Masonic Grand Body and
-never will as long as intelligent men have their right senses about
-them.
-
-
-THE GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND HAS NEVER RECOGNIZED THE PRINCE HALL GRAND
-LODGE OF MASSACHUSETTS.
-
-If it was true that the Grand Lodge of England granted a charter to
-African Lodge No. 459 at Boston, Mass., on Sept. 29th, 1784, and this
-same African Lodge organized the African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of
-Massachusetts on the 24th of June, 1791, which now is the Prince Hall
-Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, what was the matter or cause and reason
-that the Grand Lodge of England has failed and refused to recognize the
-Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts?
-
-It must be self apparent to every intelligent Mason that it shows and
-proves conclusively that the Grand Lodge of England never did grant a
-Charter to African Lodge No. 459 at Boston, Mass., as the leaders of the
-Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts would try to have you believe.
-Who in the world ever heard of a Grand Lodge granting a charter to a
-Subordinate Lodge and then refusing to recognize the very Lodge that the
-Grand Lodge granted them a charter? It is the most ridiculous and absurd
-statement I ever beard of. It certainly shows that the Grand Lodge of
-England never at all granted a charter to African Lodge No. 459. On the
-29th of Sept., 1784, and the officers of the Grand Lodge of England say
-that they did not and all the talk about a commission having been
-granted to Prince Hall as a Provincial Grand Master in America by the
-Grand Lodge of England stamps the whole thing from beginning to the end
-as a manufactured statement, a fraud and a sham.
-
-
-TWO WHITE MASONIC GRAND LODGES IN ENGLAND, ONE ORGANIZED IN 926 AND THE
-OTHER ORGANIZED IN 1739.
-
-The first Grand Lodge organized among the White Masons of England was
-organized at the City of York, England, in the year of 926, and the
-second White Grand Lodge of England was organized at London, England, in
-the year of 1739. See Mackey's Encyclopedia of Masonry; see Mitchell's
-History of Freemasonry; see the Voice of Freemasonry published in
-Chicago in the month of June, 1867. The members that composed the second
-White Grand Lodge of England when it was organized in 1739 was made up
-of expelled Masons from the first Grand Lodge of England that was
-organized in the year of 926, and the second irregular and unlawful
-Grand Lodge of England that was organized at London, England, in the
-year of 1739 is the same Grand Lodge. R. Holt was Deputy Grand Master,
-and William White was the Grand Secretary, and it was from this second
-irregular and unlawful Grand Lodge of England that the African Lodge No.
-459 claims that they secured their charter from.
-
-In all fairness if the Grand Lodge of England granted a charter to
-African Lodge No. 459 at Boston, Mass., it being a clandestine Grand
-Lodge, it would follow beyond all dispute that African Lodge No. 459 at
-Boston, Mass., was unlawful and clandestine Lodge. Although the Grand
-Lodge of England has said they did not grant any charter to African
-Lodge at Boston, Mass.
-
-
-PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE OF MASSACHUSETTS HAS NEVER PRESENTED OR SHOWED
-THE CHARTER OF AFRICAN LODGE, TO ANY PERSON.
-
-For many years the members of the Masonic fraternity have asked to see
-the charter of African Lodge No. 459. That Prince Hall Grand Lodge
-members of Massachusetts say that they had in their possession, and when
-committees after committees have called and asked for to see it they
-have been denied the opportunity and that one time they said in Boston,
-Mass., to the committee that the charter had been destroyed by fire, and
-another time they told the committee that they could not find the
-charter. Don't you think and believe that if they had a charter for
-African Lodge in Massachusetts that they would have that historical
-Lodge on their roll in their printed proceedings? If you can find the
-name of African Lodge in any of the Masonic printed proceedings of the
-Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts it is more than any body else
-can find. See and read the printed Masonic proceedings of the Prince
-Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, and see if you can find the name of
-African Lodge printed there?
-
-
-PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE OF MASSACHUSETTS IS NOT RECOGNIZED BY THE GRAND
-LODGE OF ENGLAND.
-
- Bro. John G. Jones, 33,
- Grand Master of Masons of Illinois,
- London, Eng., Dec. 20th, 1907.
-
- Dear Sir and Brother--We have remained here in London, England,
- longer than we intended to, and since writing to you I have made a
- visit to Dublin, Ireland. A large number of people in Dublin,
- Ireland, are doing fairly well, but from time to time there is a
- large number of people there leaving and going to United States. The
- other day I went to the Masonic headquarters here in London,
- England, to find out and investigate for myself if the Grand Lodge
- of England recognized the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts
- as I had always heard that our Masonry in America among Colored
- people came from Grand Lodge of England and the officials of the
- Grand Lodge of England who were very courteous to me took the
- occasion to inform me that the Grand Lodge of England does not
- recognize or affiliate with the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of
- Massachusetts. How is that Bro. Jones, that some of the Colored
- Masons keep saying in America that they got their charter from the
- Grand Lodge of England, when the Grand Lodge of England says that
- they do not recognize the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts,
- and it was at Boston, Mass., that the Colored Masons in
- Massachusetts have stated that they got a charter for a Lodge from
- the Grand Lodge of England?
-
- I want nothing more to do with any of the members that belong to the
- Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts. Our Colored brethren in
- United States should be informed about this matter.
-
- Yours Fraternally, H. S. COLLINS, 33.
-
-
-THIS IS WHAT MAKES THE PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE OF MASSACHUSETTS SPURIOUS
-AND CLANDESTINE.
-
-1--Prince Hall, Boston Smith, Thomas Sanderson and their associates of
-Boston, Mass., could not have been made Master Masons in a Lodge in
-General Gages Military Regiment on the 6th day of March, 1775, at
-Boston, Mass., for General Gages Military Regiment was not in the United
-States at that time.
-
-2--Prince Hall of Boston, Mass., never was appointed provincial Grand
-Master in the United States by the Grand Lodge of England.
-
-3--The Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts having connected itself
-with the spurious National Compact Grand Lodge of North America in 1847
-surrendered all of its rights if it had any as a Grand Lodge.
-
-4--The White Masonic Grand Lodge of England that African Lodge No. 459
-obtained a charter from was a clandestine and unlawful Grand Lodge of
-Modern Masons in England.
-
-5--The Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts styles themselves as
-Modern Masons and Modern Masons are those Masons who refused to follow
-and adhere to the ancient laws, rules and regulations and the landmarks
-of Freemasonry. Those Modern Masons are Masonic innovators.
-
- JOHN G. JONES, 33.
- Grand Master of Masons of Illinois.
-
-
-EXTRACTS FROM THE PROCEEDINGS AND SOME OF THE DECISIONS OF THE VARIOUS
-MASONIC CONGRESSES AND NATIONAL MASONIC CONVENTION HELD AMONG THE
-COLORED MASONS IN THE UNITED STATES SINCE AUGUST 11th, 1820.
-
- Chicago, Ill., April 8, 1908.
-
-To All Whom This May Concern, Greeting:
-
-The management of the International Masonic Bureau of Information of the
-world wishes to state that we have devoted much time and labor in
-collecting this much needed information which gives the time and place
-as well as the decisions and also a brief account of the proceedings of
-the various general Masonic congresses and National Masonic Convention
-that has been held among the Colored Masons in the United States of
-America since June 11th, 1820.
-
-
-THE FIRST NATIONAL CONVENTION OF COLORED MASONS OF UNITED STATES HELD
-JUNE 11th, 1820, AT PHILADELPHIA, PA.
-
-A resolution was adopted recommending to the Grand Lodges that it was
-unlawful and un-Masonic for any subordinate Lodge or Grand Lodge to
-meddle with the degrees of Royal Arch Masons.
-
-The convention after some other Masonic discussions adjourned.
-
-
-SECOND NATIONAL CONVENTION OF COLORED MASONS IN THE UNITED STATES HELD
-AT BOSTON, MASS., JUNE 24th, 1847.
-
-John T. Hilton, Wm, A. Bruce, Henry Harris of the Prince Hall Grand
-Lodge of Massachusetts, James Richmond, James Bird, Samuel Van Brackle,
-Phillip Buchanan, John Anderson, James Powell of Pennsylvania, and
-Alexander Elston, Wm. H. Clark of New York issued a call for National
-Masonic Convention to meet in Boston, Mass., June the 24th, 1847, and it
-was agreed and they did organize the National Compact Grand Lodge of
-North America. John T. Hilton of Boston, Mass., was elected M. W. N.
-Grand Master Wm. E. Ambush was elected National Grand Secretary. This
-National Grand Lodge of North America adopted a constitution claiming
-and exercising power and authority over every Grand Lodge of Masons in
-each state in the United States and Canada.
-
-This National Compact Grand Lodge in violation of all Masonic law
-proceeded to issue charters to Grand Lodges in the United States which
-was a Masonic law and rule that they adopted that was unheard of among
-Masons of any nationality in any country or any land. This National
-Compact Grand Lodge sowed the seed of discord and dissension among
-Colored Masons in this country whose record has covered one of the
-blackest pages in Masonic history. This National Compact Grand Lodge
-continued to meet and elect officers for some years thereafter placing
-heavy assessments upon subordinate Lodges and Grand Lodges throughout
-the country.
-
-
-THIRD NATIONAL CONVENTION OF COLORED MASONS HELD IN UNITED STATES WAS AT
-NEW YORK CITY OCT. 12th, 1848.
-
-James Barnett, Jacob Gibbs and several others of New York State called a
-National Masonic Convention to meet in New York City, Oct. 12, 1848.
-James Barnett was elected president of the convention.
-
-Arnold Hicks offered a series of resolutions which was adopted bitterly
-denouncing the National Compact Grand Lodge of North America that was
-organized at Boston, Mass., June 24th, 1847. He claimed that the whole
-National Compact Grand Lodge was a fraudulent and unlawful organization.
-
-Chas. Hooten offered a resolution which was adopted that the
-organization of African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Massachusetts,
-June the 24th, 1791, at Boston, Mass., with only one Lodge that such
-Grand Lodge was irregular and unlawful.
-
-The Grand Lodge representative system was discussed and properly
-outlined in the convention and each Grand Lodge was requested to follow
-the same by an exchange of Grand representatives with each Grand Lodge.
-
-A resolution was also adopted and the convention decided that the
-Masonic law watch had been strictly adhered to by all regular Masons
-that whenever a Grand Lodge for a State was organized that it required
-not less than three warranted Lodges to assemble in a Masonic convention
-for that purpose.
-
-
-FOURTH NATIONAL CONVENTION OF COLORED MASONS OF UNITED STATES WAS HELD
-AT LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS, JULY 10th, 1869.
-
-Frank Caldwell offered a resolution to the effect which was adopted that
-it is the sense of this convention that the establishing of Freemasonry
-among Colored Masons in the United States at Boston, Mass., was
-unauthorized and irregular and that the pretending of the organization
-of African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Boston, Mass., June the 24th,
-1791, was unwarranted and clandestine.
-
-
-THE FIFTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF COLORED MASONS OF UNITED STATES WHICH
-CONVENED IN CHICAGO, AUGUST 10th, 1872.
-
-A resolution was offered by W. R. Lawton and adopted that a committee of
-five (5) be appointed by the president of this congress to investigate
-the correct origin and genuineness of Freemasonry among the Colored
-Masons in the United States at Boston, Mass.
-
-President W. C. H. Curtis appointed on the committee W. R. Lawton, of
-Missouri, John G. Jones of Chicago, B. F. Rogers of Springfield, Ill.,
-Jos. H. Banks of Providence, R. I., H. D. Vena of Detroit, Mich.
-
-To the President and Members of the General Masonic Congress:
-
-The undersigned committee that was appointed to investigate the origin
-and the legal conditions of Freemasonry among our race in the State of
-Massachusetts now submit their report. Your committee wishes to be
-understood that we have taken considerable time in a thorough
-examination of the matter and we have searched diligently to ascertain
-the truth regardless of whom it may please or displease.
-
-1--We find that the establishing of the African Grand Lodge of Modern
-Masons in Massachusetts among the Colored men on June the 24th, 1791, at
-Boston, Mass., that the whole work was irregular, unlawful and contrary
-to Masonic law.
-
-The names of the Grand officers that were elected at the organization of
-this spurious and irregular African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of
-Massachusetts on June 24th, 1791, was as follows:
-
-Prince Hall Grand Master, Nero Prince, Deputy Grand Master, Cyrus
-Forbes, Grand Secretary, Peter Best, Grand Treasurer.
-
-2--Your committee have investigated and made searching inquiry to find
-who took part in the organization of the African Grand Lodge of Modern
-Masons among the colored Masons at Boston, Mass., on June the 24th,
-1791, and it appears from the records as well as the delegates from
-Massachusetts who admit and confirm the same that there was only one
-Lodge and that was African Lodge No. 459 that participated in the
-organization of the African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons that was
-organized June 24th, 1791, at Boston, Mass., such organization of the
-Grand Lodge is in open violation of Masonic laws and we cannot indorse
-or approve the same.
-
-Your committee finds according to the statements of the delegates from
-Massachusetts that since the time of the organization of the African
-Grand Lodge of Modern Masons in the State of Massachusetts which
-occurred June 24th, 1791, that no steps or effort had been made or
-taken by the officers and members of the African Grand Lodge of Modern
-Masons of Massachusetts to have said Grand Lodge Masonically legalized
-and set right.
-
-Your committee is wholly unable to find or secure any genuine
-information that even a charter was ever granted by the Grand Lodge of
-England for the establishing of African Lodge No. 459 at Boston, Mass.
-
-Your committee has investigated various printed proceedings of the
-African Grand Lodge of Massachusetts which name was changed in the year
-of 1808 to the name of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, and
-we cannot find the name of African Lodge No. 459 printed in any of the
-Grand Lodge proceedings of Massachusetts.
-
-Your committee is unable to find or be placed in the possession of any
-genuine information that would lead the committee to believe that there
-was ever a charter granted by the Grand Lodge of England to Prince Hall
-and his associates at Boston, Mass.
-
-Your committee finds further that the so-often repeated statement made
-by some of the less informed brothers of our race that the color line
-and prejudice had been the cause in the State of Massachusetts and other
-places throughout the country and especially in the northern states in
-the refusal of some of the White Grand Lodges of Masons in denying us
-recognition was not based on account of color but it was predicated
-solely upon the grounds that the origin of Freemasonry among the Colored
-Masons in the State of Massachusetts was unlawful and irregular.
-
- Committee:
- JOHN G. JONES, of Illinois,
- W. R. LAWTON, of Missouri,
- B. F. ROGERS, of Illinois,
- H. D. VENA, of Michigan,
- J. H. BANKS, of Rhode Island.
-
-The above named committee report was adopted forty-one to ten.
-
-
-THE SIXTH NATIONAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF COLORED MASONS OF THE UNITED
-STATES WAS HELD AT OMAHA, NEB., MAY THE 10th, 1874
-
-The Sixth National General Assembly of Colored Masons of the United
-States convened at Omaha, Neb., May the 10th., 1874. Delegates were
-present from the States of Pennsylvania, Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois,
-Michigan, Tennessee, Missouri, Colorado, New York and Kansas. John G.
-Jones of Chicago was elected president of the congress. E. R. Overall of
-Omaha, was elected secretary.
-
-Wm. D. Mathews, Grand Master of King Solomon Grand Lodge, of Kansas,
-applied for admission to the convention and was refused on the grounds
-that his Grand Lodge was irregular and clandestine.
-
-
-THE MOTHER OF ALL THE COMPACT AND STATE RITES IN THE UNITED STATES.
-
-Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts Colored Masons, Spurious
-Followers in New York State Come to Grief.
-
-A case has been decided in the law court at Charlotte, New York State
-that has created intense interest in the Masonic circles among Colored
-Masons in several of the States last week, and the Colored Grand Lodge
-of New York, which was first started some years ago by the Prince Hall
-Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, met an overwhelming defeat and was routed
-at every point. The Grand Lodge of the State of New York commenced a law
-suit at Charlotte, N. Y., against several Masons representing the Hiram
-Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of the State of
-Pennsylvania to prevent them from organizing lodges in the State of New
-York under the authority of the Hiram Grand Lodge of the State of
-Pennsylvania. The case came up before Judge Laverty and was bitterly
-contested, and after an argument of a whole day by counsel representing
-both sides Judge Laverty rendered his decision that after investigating
-the matter thoroughly that the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts
-that was organized many years ago, was an illegal and irregular Grand
-Body, and that the Grand Lodge in the State or New York having had
-lodges established in New York State that organized lodges from the
-Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts that established the Grand
-Lodge of New York that it was an unlawful Grand Lodge, and that the
-Hiram Grand Lodge of Colored Masons of the State of Pennsylvania was a
-lawful and regular Grand Body. The Hiram Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania was
-organized formerly of chartered lodges from the Grand Lodge of the
-District of Columbia.
-
-And the M. W. Grand Lodge A. F. and A. M. of the District of Columbia,
-held her warrant of constitution, power and authority from the White
-Grand Lodge Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of the Republic of Romania,
-Germany.
-
-This warrant was granted to Hon. H. C. Scott 33 degree G. M. in 1895, he
-was the first and only Colored man in the United States of America to
-ever receive a lawful and regular warrant from any White Grand Lodge of
-Masons of foreign jurisdiction, and is now healing and setting
-Masonically right the Colored Masons in the United States of America.
-
-What have the so-called State Rites got to say about this verdict,
-coming from the mouth of such an able jurist of the Empire State. Our
-people have been and are being robbed out of thousands of dollars by
-these bogus Masons in this and other States.
-
-Done at Masonic headquarters this first day of December, 1908. San
-Antonio, Texas.
-
-Ninth Question--What is meant by the word and title of A. F. & A. Y.
-Masons?
-
-Ninth Answer--A. F. & A. Y. Masons means Ancient, Free and Accepted York
-Masons, the city of York is in the north part of England, it is
-celebrated for its traditional connection with Freemasonry in England.
-The first charter granted in England to the Masons as a body was by
-authority and power of King Athelstan, in the year of 926 at York,
-England, and the application was made by Prince Edwin and Prince Edwin
-summoned all the Masons in England to meet him in congregation at the
-City of York, England, and from this assemblage of Masons at York the
-letter "Y" originated. Prince Edward was elected Grand Master of the
-Grand Lodge that was organized at York, England, in 926. From the
-commencement of 926 of the assembly of Masons at York the letter "Y"
-commenced, and has been known among members of the Masonic fraternity
-and at the establishing of the Grand Lodge at York, England, in the year
-926 they adopted a constitution and general regulation for the craft.
-
-Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstan of England was an eminent
-and distinguished Mason and King Athelstan was the grandson of King
-Alfred the first anointed King of England who translated the Holy Bible
-into the Saxon language.
-
-The Grand Lodge that was established in York, England, in 926 prospered
-and flourished. The City of York, England, was the seat of Masonic
-government of the craft in England.
-
-
-FREEMASONRY FIRST ORGANIZED IN THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APRIL THE 10th,
-1873, AT AUSTIN, TEXAS.
-
-Tenth Question--When was Freemasonry first established in the State of
-Texas among Colored men? As there have been a great deal of controversy
-about the matter, inasmuch as some person have fixed it one place and
-some have fixed it another place, let us see who is right?
-
-Tenth Answer--The first Lodge of Colored Masons organized in the State
-of Texas was at Austin, Texas, April 10th, 1873, the name of the Lodge
-was Mount Bonnell Lodge, it was instituted and chartered by the
-notorious self-constituted clandestine King Solomon Grand Lodge of the
-State of Kansas that Wm. D. Mathews was the Grand Master of, and all
-Masonic students and all Masonic authors in the United States have said
-time after time that the King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas was a bogus
-Grand Lodge. Sometime after Mount Bonnell Lodge was organized at Austin,
-Texas. A Lodge was organized at San Antonio, Texas, and Houston, Texas,
-and Galveston, Texas, all these Lodges were established by the spurious
-King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas. And it appears from the records and
-a circular issued by the King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas that at the
-time the convention was held to organize a Grand Lodge for the State of
-Texas that the Lodge at San Antonio, Texas, and the lodge at Houston
-Texas, was only working under a dispensation from the Grand Lodge of
-Kansas, and only a few years ago I held a conversation myself with Wm.
-D. Mathews, Grand Master of the King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas and
-he stated to me that at the time the Grand Lodge of Texas was organized
-that there was only one Lodge and that was Mount Bonnell Lodge at
-Austin, Texas, that was in good Masonic standing and that Saint John's
-Lodge at Galveston, Texas, and the Lodge at San Antonio, Texas, and the
-Lodge at Houston, Texas had been suspended by the Grand Lodge of Kansas
-for un-Masonic conduct and that the dispensation to three of these
-Lodges had been revoked by him as Grand Master of the King Solomon Grand
-Lodge of State of Kansas and in support of that the King Solomon Grand
-Lodge of Kansas refused to recognize and hold any Masonic intercourse or
-affiliation with the Grand Lodge of Texas. That matter came up and was
-discussed at the National Masonic Convention held in the city of
-Chicago, Sept. 4th, 5th, 6th, 1877.
-
-Eleventh Question--When was the Grand Lodge of Texas organized?
-
-Eleventh Answer--A convention of delegates for the purpose of arranging
-to organize a Grand Lodge of Texas was held at Brenham, Texas, Aug.
-19th, 1874, and after some considerable discussion the convention
-adjourned to meet at Houston, Texas, Jan. 19th, 1875, at Houston, Texas,
-the so-called Grand Lodge of Texas was organized Jan. 19th, 1875, N. W.
-Cuney was elected Grand Master and J. J. Hamilton was elected Grand
-Secretary so it will be seen that Freemasonry in the State of Texas was
-established in a clandestine manner by the compact King Solomon Grand
-Lodge of Kansas.
-
-Twelfth Question--Did the Grand Lodge of Texas work under the National
-Compact Grand Lodge of North America and affiliate with it?
-
-Twelfth Answer--It appears from the records that the so-called Grand
-Lodge of the State of Texas took out a charter and worked under the
-bogus National Compact Grand Lodge of North America and affiliated with
-it and this same Grand Lodge of Texas now affiliates and recognizes such
-bogus Grand Lodges as the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, and
-the notorious Compact Grand Lodge of Illinois whose records for
-irregularity and spurious Masonic work have no equal in any part of the
-world.
-
-Thirteenth Question--Has the so-called Grand Lodge of Texas that J. W.
-McKinney is the Grand Master of since it was instituted in an unlawful
-and irregular manner, has it ever been Masonically legalized by any
-Grand Lodge of Masons in the whole world, if so let them state what
-Grand Lodge it was, when it was, and where at, that question has been
-propounded to them time after time and they have refused to answer it
-and in as much as they have refused to answer it, it must be taken and
-accepted as being unlawful and a bogus Grand Lodge let me have your
-opinion about the matter?
-
-Thirteenth Answer--I have called upon the leaders of the so-called Grand
-Lodge of the State of Texas that is managed and controlled by J. W.
-McKinney and his followers in the State of Texas to name the time and
-place if they could, if their Grand Lodge was ever Masonically legalized
-and set Masonically right by any legitimate Grand Lodge in the world.
-And they have failed and refused to give the name, time or place when
-the Masonic Grand Lodge of Texas was ever Masonically legalized by any
-legitimate Grand Lodge in the country and they have failed to do that,
-they are certainly designated as an unlawful and clandestine Compact
-Grand Lodge. They were established in an irregular manner and are
-unlawful and bogus from their inception down to the present day and the
-most of the leaders of the Compact Grand Lodge in the State of Texas are
-the largest falsifiers, and liars and Masonic innovators that have ever
-held their hands up toward heaven and as for the truth, for any
-statement that they might make I would just as soon believe one of them
-over a spelling book as a Bible.
-
-[Illustration:
-
- J. F. Van Duzor, 33 deg.
- Grand Secretary
- M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge
- A. F. & A. M. Jurisdiction of Texas.]
-
-
-KING SOLOMON GRAND LODGE OF KANSAS ORGANIZED JUNE 24th, 1867.
-
-Fourteenth Question--When was the King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas
-that Wm. D. Mathews was Grand Master, when was it organized in the State
-of Kansas, and whereat, and did this King Solomon Grand Lodge in Kansas
-take out a charter and work under the National Compact Grand Lodge of
-North America, give me all the facts and information that you have at
-hand relative to that matter?
-
-Fourteenth Answer--When the King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas was
-organized June 24th, 1867, at Leavenworth, Kansas, it was accepted and
-stated by most every Colored Mason in the United States that knew
-anything about the matter that this King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas
-was organized and proclaimed to be a Grand Lodge by Wm. D. Mathews and
-his followers in the State of Kansas with only one Lodge and nobody
-knows whether or not even that Lodge was a chartered Lodge. It was said
-however that this one Masonic Lodge that proclaimed itself and organized
-the King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas that it secured a charter from
-the Compact Grand Lodge of the State of New York and at the time the
-King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas was organized with only one
-subordinate Lodge composed of a membership of eleven members. June 24th,
-1867, at Leavenworth, Kansas, it took out a warrant of authority from
-the National Compact Grand Lodge of North America that was organized in
-the State of Massachusetts on the 24th day of June, 1847, for it must be
-admitted by all well informed Masons that Massachusetts was the hotbed
-and the Masonic factory where all kinds of Masonic degrees were
-manufactured and all sorts and kinds of Masonic Lodges and Grand Lodges
-and a spurious National Grand Lodge of North America was organized to
-suit the time and conveniences of those that wished to secure and gain
-high sounding Masonic titles regardless as to whether it was right or
-wrong. If you have any doubt about the matter I herewith present a copy
-of the warrant that was issued to the King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas
-by that irregular and self-constituted National Compact Grand Lodge of
-North America whose record has covered the very blackest page in Masonic
-history among the colored Masons in this country.
-
-
-THE WARRANT OF THE MOST WORSHIPFUL KING SOLOMON GRAND LODGE FOR THE
-STATE OF KANSAS.
-
-To all whom it may concern:
-
-The Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of the Most Ancient and
-honorable fraternity of Free and Accepted Ancient York Masons of the
-United States of North America, according to the old constitution at
-York in the kingdom of England duly established and organized for the
-said United States according to the resolutions and by the authority of
-a Grand Convention held in the city of Boston, the State of
-Massachusetts on the 24th, 25th, 26th and 28th day of June, A. D., 1847;
-A. L. 5847.
-
-
-WISDOM, STRENGTH, FRATERNITY.
-
-Whereas, A petition bearing date, June 24th, A. D., 1867, was
-represented and presented in the name of Wm. D. Mathews and others
-praying the grant of a charter of Constitution and erection in the usual
-form for holding a Grand Lodge in the State of Kansas under the name and
-title of the Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge for the State of
-Kansas and under the authority of the Most Worshipful National Grand
-Lodge of the United States and North America, proposing the persons
-after mentioned to be the first grand officers, viz: Wm. D. Mathews,
-Leavenworth, Kansas, Grand Master, Geo. Edwards, Deputy Grand Master,
-Samuel Jones, Senior Grand Warden, Henry Lee, Junior Grand Warden,
-together with their associates which petition having been duly
-considered, we are pleased to ordain a charter, to be issued in the
-terms herein written.
-
-Know Ye, therefore, That the Most Worshipful National Grand Master and
-the National Grand Lodge of North America have constituted, erected and
-appointed likewise, they hereby constitute, erect, and appoint the Grand
-Master, Grand Wardens and brethren above named to be now and in all
-times coming a true and regular Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons
-for the State of Kansas under the name, style and title of the Most
-Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Ancient York
-Masons for the State of Kansas. And we do hereby authorize and empower
-our Worshipful and beloved Brethren and their successors in office to
-constitute by Charter, or organize by dispensation subordinate Lodges
-within the State of Kansas and its jurisdiction, according to the
-Constitution of Masonry and of the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge
-of North America, upon the payment of such fees as may be determined by
-the said Most Worshipful Grand Lodge; also to make choice of a Grand
-Master, Deputy Grand Master, Grand Wardens and other Grand Officers
-annually to receive and collect funds for the support of the Most
-Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas, and for the payment of
-such sums of money as may be assessed by the Constitution and
-regulations of the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge.
-
-And we do further authorize and empower the said constituted brethren
-and their successors to have and determined all and singular matters and
-things relating to the craft within their jurisdiction with the
-assistance of the members of the said Grand Lodge subject to an appeal
-to the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of North America and shall
-possess and exercise all the power and function of a State Grand Lodge
-and we do hereby require the said constituted brethren to attend the
-Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of North America at their triennial
-communication and other meetings by their Grand Master, Deputy Grand
-Master and Grand Wardens, or by proxy regularly appointed; also to keep
-a fair and regular record of your proceedings in a book to be kept for
-that purpose and we do enjoin upon the officers and brethren of said
-Grand Lodge that they be punctual in their payments of such sums of
-money as may be assessed on them by the National Grand Lodge of North
-America, and to make regular returns annually to the National Grand
-Secretary or to the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of the names
-and members of all the Lodges under the jurisdiction of said Grand Lodge
-where located, of the suspensions, expulsions and the Charters
-surrendered; also the number of members belonging to each Subordinate
-Lodge and of the election and installation of the officers of the Grand
-Lodge.
-
-And we do hereby declare that the proceedings of said Grand Lodge in
-National Grand Lodge to commence from the 24th day of June Anno Domini,
-One Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty-seven; and lastly do we hereby
-authorize and empower our said Worshipful Brother Wm. D. Mathews and his
-associates in office to install their successors being first duly
-elected and chosen to whom they shall deliver this warrant and invest
-them with all the power and dignities to their offices respectfully
-belonging and such successors shall in like manner from time to time
-install their successors, such installation to be upon or near St. John
-the Evangelist or St. John the Baptist's day, during the continuance of
-this Grand Lodge for ever provided always that the said above named
-Worshipful Brothers and their successors pay due respect to the Most
-Worshipful National Grand Lodge of North America, and the ordinance
-thereof; otherwise this warrant to be of no force or virtue.
-
-Given by the authority of the Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of North
-America, under the signatures of the Most Worshipful National Grand
-Officers and the Seal of the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of
-North America, this 24th day of June Anno Domini, One Thousand Eight
-Hundred and Sixty-seven.
-
- Richard Howell Gleaves, M. W. N. G. M.
- Jonathan Davis, M. W. N. G. S.
-
-
-THE NATIONAL COMPACT GRAND LODGE OF NORTH AMERICA ORGANIZED AT BOSTON,
-MASS., JUNE 24th, 1847.
-
-Fifteenth Question--In as much as there has been considerable discussion
-and controversy going on through the country for a number of years,
-relative to when the National Compact Grand Lodge of North America was
-organized and where at, and whether or not it was considered irregular
-and unlawful or whether it was a legitimate body, those questions have
-been asked for a number of years.
-
-Fifteenth Answer--Mackey's Masonic jurisprudence and all of the Masonic
-authors on Masonic law have laid down the well established rule that has
-been recognized in the United States of America ever since Freemasonry
-was first established in this country, that there cannot be any higher
-or Supreme power than a Grand Lodge of a state. And the spurious
-National Compact Grand Lodge of North America is an unauthorized and
-clandestine body. It was organized in Boston, Mass., on the 24th of
-June, 1847, it has been a disgrace and a burning shame and a slander
-upon the Colored Masons of this country ever since it was first
-organized. The National Compact Grand Lodge of North America that was
-established at Boston, Mass., on the 24th of June, 1847, is a self
-constituted, bogus, counterfeit grand body, and any Grand Lodge or
-Subordinate Lodge in the United States of America that affiliates or
-recognizes it is clandestine and bogus.
-
-Sixteenth Question--When the Grand Lodge of Texas was organized at
-Houston, Texas, Jan. 19th, 1875, that J. W. McKinney is now the Grand
-Master of, did that Grand Lodge have a Charter from the Bogus National
-Compact Grand Lodge of North America?
-
-Sixteenth Answer--Yes they did, and looking over the records of the
-National Grand Lodge of North America that was organized at Boston,
-Mass., in 1847, which was a bogus concern. Here is a copy of the Charter
-that was issued to the Grand Lodge of Texas in 1875 by the Spurious
-National Compact Grand Lodge of North America.
-
-
-THE WARRANT OF THE MOST WORSHIPFUL COMPACT GRAND LODGE OF FREE AND
-ACCEPTED YORK MASONS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS.
-
-To All Whom It May Concern:
-
-The Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of the Most Ancient and
-honorable fraternity of Free and Accepted Ancient York Masons of the
-United States of North America, according to the old constitution at
-York in the kingdom of England duly established and organized for the
-said Convention held in the city of Boston, the State of Massachusetts
-on the 24th, 25th, 26th and 28th day of June, A. D., 1847; A. L. 5847.
-
-Whereas a petition bearing date Jan. 19th, 1875, was represented and
-presented in the name of N. W. Cuney and others from the State of Texas
-praying the grant of a Charter of Constitution in the usual form for
-holding a Grand Lodge in the State of Texas under the name and title of
-the Most Worshipful Compact Grand Lodge for the State of Texas, and
-under the authority of the Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of the United
-States and North America proposing the persons hereafter mentioned to be
-the first Grand Master and the first Grand Secretary viz: N. W. Cuney of
-Galveston, Texas Grand Master, J. J. Hamilton Grand Secretary together
-with their associates which petition having been duly considered we are
-pleased to ordain a Charter to be issued in the terms herein written.
-
-Know Ye, therefore, that the Most Worshipful National Grand Master and
-the National Grand Lodge of North America have constituted, erected and
-appointed likewise, they do hereby constitute, erect and appoint the
-Grand Master and Grand Wardens, and brethren to be now and in all times
-coming a Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted York Masons for the State of
-Texas, and we do hereby authorize and empower our worthy and beloved
-brethren and their successors in office to constitute by charter or
-organize Lodges within the State of Texas according to the constitution
-of the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of North America duly
-constituted on the 24th day of June, 1847, at Boston, Mass., and comply
-with the rules and regulations and the payment of such sums of money as
-be assessed by the Constitution and regulation of the Most Worshipful
-National Grand Lodge of North America.
-
-And we do further authorize and empower the said constituted brethren
-and their successors to have and determined all and singular matters and
-things relating to the craft within their jurisdiction with the
-assistance of the members of the said Grand Lodge subject to an appeal
-to the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of North America and shall
-possess and exercise all the power and function of a State Grand Lodge
-and we do hereby require the said constituted brethren to attend the
-Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of North America at their triennial
-communication and other meetings by their Grand Master, Deputy Grand
-Master and Grand Wardens or by proxy regularly appointed; also to keep a
-fair and regular record of your proceedings in a book to be kept for
-that purpose and we do enjoin upon the officers and brethren of said
-Grand Lodge in the State of Texas that they be punctual in their
-payments of such sums of money as may be assessed on them by this
-National Compact Grand Lodge of North America and to make regular
-returns annually to the National Grand Secretary or to the Most
-Worshipful National Grand Lodge.
-
-And we do hereby declare that the proceedings of said Grand Lodge in the
-State of Texas by which brother N. W. Cuney is the Grand Master of to
-commence from Jan. 19th, 1875, and we do hereby authorize and empower
-our said Worshipful Brother N. W. Cuney of Galveston, Texas, and his
-associates in office to install their successors first being duly
-elected and chosen to whom they shall deliver this warrant and invest
-them with all the powers and dignities to their offices respectfully
-belonging and such successors shall like manner from time to time
-install their successors, such installation to be upon or near the St.
-John the Evangelist or St. John the Baptist's day during the continuance
-of this Grand Lodge.
-
-Given by the authority of the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of
-North America under the signature of the Most Worshipful National Grand
-Master of the Most Worshipful National Grand Lodge of North America this
-19th day of Jan. 1875.
-
- Richard Howell Cleaves, M. W. N. G. M.
-
-Seventeenth Question--Did you ever have any correspondence with Wm. D.
-Mathews, Grand Master of the Compact Grand Lodge of the State of Kansas
-relative to the organization of the so-called Grand Lodge of the State
-of Texas that was organized Jan. 19th, 1875?
-
-Seventeenth Answer--Yes, I had some correspondence with Wm. D. Mathews,
-Grand Master of the King Solomon Grand Lodge of the State of Kansas
-relative to the subordinate Lodges that took part in the organization of
-the Grand Lodge of Texas, Jan. 19th, 1875. That was the time that the
-Grand Lodge of Texas was organized when N. W. Cuney of Galveston, Texas,
-was elected Grand Master.
-
-
- Leavenworth, Kan., Nov. 21, 1903.
-
- Mr. John G. Jones, 33,
-
- Grand Secretary of the M. W. St. Johns Grand Lodge of Illinois,
-
- Dear Sir and Bro--Your letter reached me last week at my home in
- Leavenworth, Kan., and in giving you the information that you desire
- the Lodge at Austin, Texas, was the first Lodge of Colored Masons
- organized among the Colored men in the State of Texas, it was on
- April 10th, 1873, it was chartered by the Most Worshipful King
- Solomon Grand Lodge of Kansas of which I have the honor of being its
- Grand Master. That was the only Lodge that was in good Masonic
- standing in our Grand Lodge when the Grand Lodge of the State of
- Texas was organized. The Lodge at San Antonio, Galveston, and
- Houston Texas was also chartered by our Grand Lodge of Kansas, but
- none of these last named three Lodges was in good and regular
- standing in our Grand Lodge. So you will notice that the Grand Lodge
- of Texas only had one warranted Lodge when it was established.
-
- Yours Fraternally,
- WM. D. MATHEWS, Grand Master.
-
-
-REPORT ON THE ORIGIN AND THE IRREGULARITY OF FREEMASONRY AMONG COLORED
-MEN IN THE STATE OF TEXAS AT THE NATIONAL MASONIC CONVENTION HELD IN
-CHICAGO, SEPT., 4th, 1877.
-
-To the President and Members of the National Masonic Convention now
-Sitting in Chicago, Sept. 4th, 1877:
-
-Your committee that was appointed to investigate the origin of
-Freemasonry in the State of Texas beg leave to make the following
-report:
-
-We have carefully investigated the matter of the origin of Freemasonry
-in the State of Texas and we find that it appears from the record that
-Freemasonry was first established in the State of Texas by Wm. D.
-Mathews, Grand Master of the King Solomon Grand Lodge of Compact Masons
-for the State of Kansas which at the time the said King Solomon Grand
-Lodge of Kansas was under and subordinate to the National Compact Grand
-Lodge of North America.
-
-We further find that the said Grand Lodge of Texas that C. C. Dean is
-the Grand Master of that, the said Grand Lodge of Texas, when organized
-January 19th, 1875, did not follow and comply with the landmarks and
-laws of Freemasonry and that the said Grand Lodge of Texas is an
-unlawful and irregular Grand Lodge and that the delegates from the Grand
-Lodge of the State of Texas to this National Masonic Convention are not
-entitled to seats in this National Masonic Convention,
-
- Fraternally Submitted,
- E. A. WILLIAMS, of Nebraska,
- H. D. VENA, of Michigan,
- J. H. BANKS, of Rhode Island, Committee.
-
-
-FIRST REGULAR AND LEGAL GRAND LODGE OF COLORED MASONS IN UNITED STATES
-AT WASHINGTON, D. C., 1895.
-
-The first Grand Lodge of Colored Masons in the United States that was
-healed and Masonically set right was the Grand Lodge of Colored Masons
-of the District of Columbia which H. C. Scott is the Grand Master of. It
-occurred in the year of 1895 by the duly accredited representatives from
-the White Masonic Grand Lodge of Romania, Germany.
-
-
-VARIOUS GRAND LODGE DECISIONS.
-
-FIRST LEGAL GRAND LODGE OF COLORED MASONS IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, MARCH
-19th, 1908.
-
-The Most Worshipful St. Johns Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. M. Masons of the
-State of Illinois established several Subordinate Lodges in the State of
-Texas. A Masonic convention was held in the State of Texas by several of
-the Subordinate Lodges in the State of Texas on March 19th, 1908, at San
-Antonio, Texas, and the Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of A.
-F. & A. Masons for the State of Texas was organized. Bro. Chas. L.
-Mitchell is Grand Master and Bro. J. F. VanDuzor is the Grand Secretary.
-
- Yours Fraternally,
- JOHN G. JONES, 33,
- Grand Master of Masons of the State of Illinois.
-
-
-DECISIONS OF MASONIC GRAND LODGES.
-
-1.--Since the Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia has been under the
-supervision and control of the Past Grand Master Wm. H. Johnson and the
-present Grand Master H. C. Scott of Washington, D. C., the Grand Lodge
-has rendered some very important decisions which has been a guide for
-many of the Grand Lodges for sometime in the past and will be a guide
-and a landmark for many of the Grand Lodges in the future.
-
-The Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts is Irregular and
-clandestine, it was instituted with only one subordinate Lodge.
-
-The Most Worshipful St. John's Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the
-State of Illinois that Bro. John G. Jones is the Grand Master of was
-lawfully and constitutionally established according to the landmarks and
-laws of Freemasonry and is recognized by this Grand Lodge.
-
-The Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the
-State of Texas that Bro. Chas. L. Mitchell is Grand Master of has been
-regularly and lawfully established and is recognized by this Grand
-Lodge.
-
-The Most Worshipful St. Andrew's Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Mason of the
-State of Louisiana that Wm. T. Grant is the Grand Master of has been
-regularly instituted according to the landmarks and laws of Freemasonry
-and is recognized by this Grand Lodge.
-
-The Most Worshipful German Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State
-of Alabama that Bro. J. H. McGehee is the Grand Master of has been
-lawfully instituted and is recognized by this Grand Lodge.
-
-The Most Worshipful Wm. T. Grant, Jr., Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons
-of the State of Mississippi has been regularly organized and is
-recognized by this Grand Lodge. Bro. J. R. Rawlins of Natchez, Miss., is
-the Grand Master of.
-
-The Most Worshipful Hiram Grand Lodge of A. F. A. Masons of the State of
-Pennsylvania that Bro. C. R. France is the Grand Master of, has been
-instituted in a regular and lawful manner and is recognized by this
-Grand Lodge.
-
-The Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of the State of Florida that Bro. E. E.
-Franklin is the Grand Master of was regularly instituted and is
-recognized by us.
-
-We find the formation of the spurious Grand Lodge of Texas that J. W.
-McKinney is the Grand Master of and W. M. McDonald is the Grand
-Secretary of, was established in the most extraordinary irregular and
-unlawful manner and is with the establishing of the bogus Prince Hall
-Grand Lodge of Massachusetts which was only organized with one Lodge.
-
-The so-called Grand Lodge in the State of Texas which is said to have
-been instituted by K. R. Rogers of Austin, Texas, and is known as the
-Hiram Tyram Grand Lodge is beyond all question or doubt the most
-Clandestine and irregular Masonic Grand Lodge that has ever appeared
-upon the Masonic stage of action. It is a Grand Lodge only on paper and
-was instituted not in compliance with any of the landmarks or laws of
-Freemasonry and is therefore counterfeit and Bogus and is not recognized
-by this Grand Lodge.
-
-This Grand Lodge has carefully examined into the origin of the Compact
-Grand Lodge of Masons in the State of Illinois that H. E. Burris, of
-Rock Island is the Grand Master, and the notorious R. E. Moore is the
-Grand Secretary of, and we find it was instituted with only two
-warranted Lodges and a Lodge under dispensation and from the records of
-the Grand Lodge of Ohio one of the warranted Lodges that took part in
-the convention was at that time not in good standing with the Grand
-Lodge of Ohio. See records of the Grand Lodge of Ohio of 1865 and 1866.
-
-Prince Hall of Massachusetts, a founder of a Spurious and Illegitimate
-Masonry, among the Colored Masons in the United States, died at Boston,
-Mass., in the year of 1807.
-
-
-COLORED GRAND LODGE OF ALABAMA.
-
-The Colored Masonic Grand Lodge of the State of Alabama which is named
-the German Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Alabama in
-the year of 1906 at the annual session held at Montgomery, Ala., Bro.
-J. H. McGehee, 33, Grand Master, and Bro. G. W. Hill, 32, Grand
-Secretary, the Grand Lodge made the following decisions:
-
-That the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts was organized with
-only one Lodge which makes the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Massachusetts
-unlawful clandestine and irregular Grand Lodge.
-
-It requires not less than three warranted Lodges to assemble in a
-Masonic convention and organize a regular Grand Lodge for a State.
-
-All Masons who are members of Compact Lodges are Bogus, Irregular and
-Clandestine, and must not be recognized as Masons anywhere.
-
-No compact Mason can be admitted in any subordinate Lodge in this State.
-
-
-COLORED MASONIC LODGES OF COLORADO.
-
-No Supreme Council of Ancient, Accepted Scottish Rite Masons possess any
-right or power or authority to confer the degrees of entered apprentice
-fellow-craft and Master Masons degree.
-
-If a commandery of Knights Templars should confer the entered apprentice
-fellow-craft and Master Mason's degree it is spurious and unlawful
-Masonic work.
-
-
-DECISIONS OF WHITE MASONIC GRAND LODGES. GRAND LODGE OF ARKANSAS.
-
-The White Masonic Grand Lodge of the State of Arkansas at the annual
-session held in 1838 and 1838 rendered the following decision:
-
-This Grand Lodge will not recognize a Grand Lodge unless it has been
-regularly organized by not less than three warranted Lodges.
-
-GRAND LODGE OF CONNECTICUT.
-
-The White Grand Lodge of Connecticut was organized July 8th, 1789, the
-following is some of the decisions that the Grand Lodge of Connecticut
-has rendered:
-
-One Grand Lodge cannot issue a charter to organize another Grand Lodge.
-
-The power and the authority to organize a Grand Lodge resides in the
-three warranted Lodges that meet in a Masonic convention for that
-purpose.
-
-A regular Grand Lodge of Masons of a state is vested with power and
-authority to go in another state and there organize subordinate Lodges
-if the Grand Lodge in that state which has been already organized was
-organized In an unlawful and irregular manner.
-
-When a Grand Lodge of a state has been organized in an unlawful Masonic
-way and manner it is then considered as no Grand Lodge at all and
-another lawful and regular Grand Lodge has the authority and power to
-invade such territories and there organize regular subordinate Lodges.
-
-The White Masonic Grand Lodge of Alabama in the year of 1821 rendered
-the following decisions at the session held at Montgomery, Alabama,
-Thomas W. Farrar was Grand Master and Thomas A. Rogers was Grand
-Secretary.
-
-A Grand Lodge of a State cannot be regularly organized unless there is
-not less than three regularly warranted Lodges.
-
-
-WHITE MASONIC GRAND LODGE OF DELAWARE.
-
-The Masonic Lodge of the State of Delaware since it was organized on
-June the 6th, 1806, has rendered some very important decisions which has
-been a guide for many of the Grand Lodges that have been organized since
-that time.
-
-The African Grand Lodge of Colored Masons in the State of Massachusetts
-cannot be recognized not because they are Colored Masons but for the
-reason that they were unlawfully instituted. They organized a Grand
-Lodge with only one Lodge when they should have had not less than
-three.
-
-A regular Grand Lodge must be organized with not less than three
-warranted Lodges.
-
-
-THE LIGHT TURNED ON, ON BOGUS MASONRY IN TEXAS.
-
-The record shows the first Lodges In Texas were organized by Capt. W. D.
-Matthews, Grand Master of the King Solomon Compact Grand Lodge of
-Kansas, on April 10, 1873, by organizing Mt. Bonnell Lodge No. 1,
-Austin, No. 2, San Antonio and No. 3 Houston, No. 4 at Galveston. On the
-19th of August, 1875, these four lodges met at Brenham, Texas, and
-organized a Compact Grand Lodge with N. W. Cuney as the Grand Master,
-and J. J. Hamilton as Grand Secretary.
-
-Some years after, about 1885, (the record is not clear,) C. C. Dean
-succeeded N. W. Cuney as Grand Master. Rev. A. Grant, W. D. G. M., and
-in the year 1886 C. C. Dean, G. M.
-
-Rev. A. Grant, W. D. G. M., called a special session of the Grand Lodge
-and at that session declared and adopted the act of Secession from the
-National Compact Grand Lodge, elected delegates to go to Houston, Texas,
-as special commissioners to meet the Worshipful Grand Lodge of White
-Masons for the purpose of being healed and chartered.
-
-Now, according to the record found in Sayles' Masonic Jurisprudence, on
-the History of Negro Masonry in Texas, emphatically states that these
-Negro delegates did appear and did present to the White Grand Lodge a
-petition to be healed and chartered.
-
-Sayles does not give the names of the petitioners. The petition sets
-forth that there were 650 members at that time, to be healed.
-
-The record shows that the White Grand Lodge appointed a committee to
-investigate the petition, and the record further shows that the
-committee made the following report:
-
-COMMITTEE REPORT ON NEGRO MASONRY IN TEXAS.
-
-"We your committee find that these 650 so-called Negro Masons are not
-Masons, and have no business with us nor about us, neither of us. If
-Ephriam is joined to his Idols let him alone."
-
-Now the record further shows that this Grand Lodge has sent delegates to
-the General Masonic Congress on several occasions, and these delegates
-were rejected. The first was in Sept. 4th and 5th, 1887, at Chicago. Mr.
-Gillett of Kansas, offered the following resolution and it was
-unanimously adopted:
-
-"Whereas, The facts are before this convention that the Grand Lodge of
-Texas, Colored, under C. C. Dean as Grand Master, was organized by
-subordinate lodges instituted in the State of Texas by W. D. Matthews,
-Grand Master of the Compact Grand Lodge of Kansas.
-
-"Be it Resolved by this convention that the said Grand Lodge of Texas,
-above mentioned, is hereby now declared by this convention to be an
-unlawful and irregular Grand Lodge, and that this National Masonic
-convention will now refuse and neither recognize or admit their
-delegates in this convention."
-
-And similar resolutions were adopted at the General Masonic Congress
-that was held in Pittsburgh, Pa., July, 1904.
-
-
-HOW THE MOST WORSHIPFUL KING SOLOMON GRAND LODGE, A. F. & A. M. WAS
-ORGANIZED IN THE STATE OF TEXAS.
-
-The origination of the M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge, A. F. & A. Masons
-which was organized March 19, A. D., 1908, and incorporated under the
-laws of the State of Texas, March 27, A. D., 1908, of the following
-Lodges, viz:
-
-Mount Nebo Lodge No. 14, Galveston, Tex., Brackenridge Lodge No. 21,
-Excelsior Lodge No. 25, San Antonio, Golden Jewel Lodge No. 23, Taylor;
-Eureka Lodge No. 12, Hempstead.
-
-These (5) five Lodges held their warrant of constitution from the M. W.
-St. John Grand Lodge, A. F. & A. M. of the State of Illinois of which
-the Hon. John G. Jones, 33rd degree, is Grand Master, and the M. W. St.
-John Grand Lodge, A. F. & A. M. held her warrant of constitution from
-the M. W. Grand Lodge A. F. & A. M., of Washington, District of
-Columbia, of which Hon. H. C. Scott, 33rd degree is Grand Master. This
-warrant was granted to Hon. H. C. Scott, 33rd degree Grand Master in the
-year 1895. He was the first and only Colored Mason in the United States
-of America to ever receive a lawful and regular warrant from any White
-Grand Lodge of Masons of foreign jurisdiction, and he is now healing and
-setting Masonically right the Colored Masons in the United States of
-America.
-
-According to Masonic law the only lawful and regular Grand Lodge of
-Colored Masons in the State of Texas is the Most Worshipful King Solomon
-Grand Lodge, A. F. & A. M., which was organized at San Antonio, Texas,
-on 19th day of March, A. D., 1908 and lawfully incorporated under the
-laws of the State of Texas on the 27th day of March, A. D., 1908, and it
-is the only Colored Grand Lodge A. F. & A. M. in the State of Texas that
-is recognized by foreign White Masonic jurisdiction of which C. L.
-Mitchell, 33rd degree is Grand Master.
-
- In Reference to the Circular Matter Relative to One John A. Bell
- of Grand Rapids, Mich., Claiming to Hold a Warrant of Authority
- From the Grand Lodge of Liberia, I Beg Leave to Submit a Copy.
- The Original is Now in Possession of the Ill. Capt. W. T. Grant,
- M. W. Grandmaster of the M. W. St. Andrews Grand Lodge A. F. &
- A. M. of the State of Louisiana, and President of the
- International Bureau of Masonic Information of the World. Office
- 331 Corondelet St., New Orleans, La.
-
- Masonic Hall,
- Monrovia, Liberia
- Oct. 18, 1908.
-
- Bro. W. T. Grant,
-
- Grand Master of the M. W. St. Andrew Grand Lodge A. F. & A. M.
- State of Louisiana.
-
- Most Worshipful Brother: I beg to acknowledge the receipt of
- your favor of the 29th of August, inquiring if this Grand Lodge
- or the Grand Master has a Deputy in the person of John A. Bell
- at Grand Rapids, Michigan, and if any authority has been given
- him to open a lodge in America.
-
- In reply, I have to say that this Grand Lodge has no Deputy in
- the person of John A. Bell, nor has any warrant been given him
- authorising him to open any lodge in America or to do anything
- else. If he is doing anything Masonically whatsoever, he does it
- without the knowledge, consent and authority of this Grand
- Lodge.
-
- I beg to remain,
- Fraternally yours,
- A. B. STUBBLEFIELD,
- Grand Master of Masons in the Republic of Liberia.
-
-
-CERTIFICATE OF HEALING AND LEGALIZING MASONS AND LODGES IN THE STATE OF
-TEXAS MARCH 19th, 1908.
-
- Chicago, Ill., April 25, 1908.
-
-To All Whom This May Concern, Greeting:
-
-Whereas, in the course of Masonic events it becomes necessary for one
-regular and legitimate Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons to heal and
-Masonically legalize Master Masons and Lodges and a Grand Lodge when the
-Masonic degrees have been conferred and Masonic work in subordinate
-Lodges has been irregularly and un-Masonically accomplished.
-
-Whereas, there was a certain number of Masons viz: Chas. L. Mitchell, W.
-L. Dorn, J. F. VanDuzor and their associates in the City of San Antonio,
-Texas, and Phillip H. Matthews, Simon Smith of Galveston, Texas; Frank
-H. Hicks, John Lowery of Taylor, Texas, James F. Harris, Nelson W. Day
-of Hempstead, Texas, and several other brethren residing in the various
-parts of the State of Texas, having received the degrees of Freemasonry
-in an unlawful and irregular and illegitimate manner and,
-
-Whereas, application having been made by the above named brethren and
-their associates in the State of Texas and the Masonic Lodges which the
-above named brethren were members of in the State of Texas to the Most
-Worshipful St. John's Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of
-Illinois and Masonic jurisdiction to be regularly healed and Masonically
-legalized as Master Mason and members of the various warranted Masonic
-Lodges in the State of Texas.
-
-Whereas, the petition of the above named brethren in the State of Texas
-having been duly presented and considered in open session of the Most
-Worshipful St. John's Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of
-Illinois in special session held in the city of Chicago, Ill., on the
-12th of February, 1908, and the prayer of the above named petitioners
-was then and there duly considered and unanimously granted.
-
-Whereas, the Most Worshipful St. John's Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons
-of the State of Illinois and Masonic jurisdiction having in open session
-duly instructed and empowered the Grand Master of the Most Worshipful
-St. John's Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Illinois and
-Masonic jurisdiction to repair to the State of Texas and there proceed
-to heal and Masonically legalize the Lodges and the above named brethren
-residing in the State of Texas and to assist them in the formation and
-install the officers of the Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of
-A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Texas.
-
-Therefore, be it known that I John G. Jones, 33, of the City of Chicago
-and State of Illinois and Grand Master of the Most Worshipful St. John's
-Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Illinois and Masonic
-jurisdiction did in the City of San Antonio, Texas, on the 19th of
-March, 1908, did then and there under the instructions and authority of
-the Most Worshipful St. John's Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the
-State of Illinois did in said city of San Antonio, Texas, on the 19th of
-March 1908, heal, re-obligate and Masonically legalize the above named
-brethren who had conferred on them the entered apprentice, fellowcraft
-and Master Masons degrees and did Masonically legalize the subordinate
-Lodges in the State of Texas and did assist and was present in the
-formation of the Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of A. F. & A.
-Mason of the State of Texas and did install Bro. Chas. L. Mitchell Most
-Worshipful Grand Master, and the rest of the brethren as Grand Officers
-of the Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of Texas according to
-the Masonic laws, rules and regulations of the craft.
-
-And I now do proclaim to the whole Masonic world that the Most
-Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of the State of Texas of A. F. & A.
-Masons has been regularly constituted according to the laws and land
-marks of Freemasonry.
-
-The Most Worshipful St. John's Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the
-State of Illinois and jurisdiction further declare that the Most
-Worshipful King Solomon Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of
-Texas is the only regular and lawful Grand Lodge of Colored Masons in
-the State of Texas.
-
- Yours Fraternally,
- JOHN G. JONES, Grand Master.
-
-
-[Illustration]
-
-MOST WORSHIPFUL KING SOLOMON GRAND LODGE, ANCIENT, FREE AND ACCEPTED
-MASONS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND JURISDICTION ORGANIZED ON THE 19th DAY
-OF MARCH 1908 AT SAN ANTONIO.
-
-A Masonic Convention of several warranted Lodges of Ancient, Free and
-Accepted Masons of the State of Texas, assembled in Masonic Convention
-in the city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on the 19th day of
-March 1908, and lawfully organized Most Worshipful King Solomon Grand
-Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of the State of Texas and
-Masonic jurisdiction, and the grand officers were elected and installed.
-
-The Grand Officers were installed by Bro. John G. Jones, Grand Master of
-the Most Worshipful St. Johns Grand Lodge of A. F. and A. M. of the
-State of Illinois.
-
-Addresses were made by several of the brethren and after the transaction
-of considerable business, charges were preferred against Bro. K. R.
-Rogers of Austin, Texas, and he was expelled for un-Masonic conduct,
-from rights and privileges of Free Masonry.
-
-
-[Illustration]
-
-KEYSTONE GRAND CHAPTER OF ROYAL ARCH MASONS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS AND
-JURISDICTION, ORGANIZED MARCH 20th, 1908, AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
-
-A Masonic convention of seven Chapters of Royal Arch Masons met in
-convention and organized a Keystone Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons
-for the State of Texas, and the Grand Officers were elected and
-installed. The Grand officers were installed by Companion John G. Jones.
-33rd degree of Chicago, Ill., Most Excellent Grand High Priest of the
-Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons for the State of Illinois.
-
-Companion K. R. Rogers, 33rd degree of Austin, Texas, was expelled for
-un-Masonic conduct from all the rights and privileges of Royal
-Arch-Masonry.
-
-
-[Illustration]
-
-MOUNT CALVARY GRAND COMMANDERY, KNIGHT TEMPLARS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
-AND MASONIC JURISDICTION, ORGANIZED ON THE 20th DAY OF MARCH, 1908, AT
-SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
-
-A convention of Knight Templars, and representatives from seven (7)
-warranted Commanderies of Knight Templars in the State of Texas met in
-convention on March 20th, 1908, at San Antonio, and organized the Mount
-Calvary Grand Commandery of Knight Templars for the State of Texas. The
-Grand Officers were elected and Installed by Most Eminent Sir John G.
-Jones, 33rd degree Grand Master of the Grand Encampment of Knight
-Templars of the United States and Canada.
-
-Sir K. R. Rogers, of Austin, Texas, was expelled for unbecoming Masonic
-conduct, from Knighthood throughout the world. All Sir Knights and all
-Commanderies of Knight Templars are hereby notified of the same.
-
-
-[Illustration]
-
-ORIENTAL GRAND TEMPLE MYSTIC SHRINE, ORGANIZED MARCH 20, 1908
-
-A convention of Mystic Shrine and representatives from several Temples
-met in convention on March 20, 1908, and organized the Oriental Grand
-Temple. Grand officers were elected and installed by Noble John G.
-Jones, 33rd degree Imperial Grand Potentate of the Imperial Grand
-Council of North and South America. Noble K. R. Rogers, 33rd degree was
-tried, found guilty and expelled for un-Masonic conduct from all the
-rights and privileges of the Mystic Shrine.
-
-
-ST. JOHN'S GRAND CONSISTORY, A. A. S. R. ORGANIZED MARCH 21, 1908.
-
-A convention of S. P. R. S., 32nd degree and representatives met in
-convention and organized St. John's Grand Consistory on March 21, 1908.
-Grand officers were duly installed by Ill. John G. Jones, 33rd M. P.
-Sov. Grand commander of the United Supreme Council, A. A. S. R., U. S.
-A.
-
-Ill. K. R. Rogers was expelled for gross un-Masonic conduct for life.
-
-At the annual session of 1905, John A. Bell, 33, of Grand Rapids, Mich.,
-Wm. Gray, 33, H. W. Knight, 33, of Chicago, Ill., Daniel Brown, 33, of
-Rosebud, Ala., and at a special session held at San Antonio, Texas,
-March 20th, 1908, K. R. Rogers, 33, of Austin, Texas, was expelled for
-un-Masonic conduct from all the rights and privileges of the A. A. S.
-Rite throughout the world.
-
-Copy of original letter from John G. Jones, to K. R. Rogers.
-
- Chicago, Ill., March 25th, 1908.
-
-[Illustration]
-
- Mr. K. R. Rogers, 33,
- Austin, Texas.
-
-You are hereby notified that at a special session of the United Supreme
-Council of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite Masons of the 33rd degree
-held at San Antonio, Texas, on the 20th of March, 1908, that charges for
-un-Masonic conduct were preferred against you, and after the charges had
-been thoroughly investigated you was found guilty of un-Masonic conduct,
-and was expelled for un-Masonic conduct from the United Supreme Council
-of the 33rd degree. And from all the rights and privileges of Scottish
-Rite Freemasonry throughout the world and the craft is hereby notified
-of the same.
-
-No further correspondence with you will be necessary or required.
-
- Yours Fraternally,
- JOHN G. JONES, 33,
- Sov. Grand Commander.
-
-
-EXCERPTS FROM THE MASONIC GUIDE.
-
-Official Organ of the Supreme Grand Council of the Ancient Accepted
-Scottish Rite Masons of the Southern and Western Jurisdiction of the
-United States of America.
-
-Montgomery, Ala., April 11, 1908--King Solomon Grand Lodge of the Lone
-Star State (Texas) has been legally organized, 19th day of March, 1908,
-at San Antonio, Texas. Ill. C. L. Mitchell, 33, Grand Master, 310
-Monterey Street, San Antonio; Ill. J. F. VanDuzor, Grand Secretary; K.
-R. Rogers, 33d, of Austin, was expelled. Mount Calvary Grand Commandery
-Knights Templars and Keystone Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons, were
-organized by Ill. John G. Jones, 33d, G. G. C. of Chicago. All of this
-grand work was done on March 19th and 20th, 1908. Ill. John G. Jones is
-destined to capture the United States. Ill. C. L. Mitchell, 33d, will
-lead Texas against all opposition and perfidy. Hurrah for the Texas
-invincible. The German Grand Lodge of Alabama, A. F. and A. Masons,
-extend them the right hand of fellowship. We will gladly accept a
-fraternal representative from that jurisdiction, as this is the only
-Legal Grand Masonic Lodge organized in Texas.
-
-Montgomery, Ala., June 20, 1908--The Grand Lodge over which Mr. J. W.
-McKinney, of Texas, presides is spurious and bogus, and belongs to the
-original Prince Hall Clandestine National Compact Grand Lodge of Masons
-of Boston, Mass. He has no Masonic authority in the world for operating
-Masonry in the State of Texas. Ill. C. L. Mitchell, 33d, is the only
-legal Grand Master of A. F. & A. M. in Texas, and all intelligent
-gentlemen like Dr. Sparks, of Terrell, Tex., and others will allow Ill.
-Mitchell, of San Antonio, Texas, to heal and Masonically set them right.
-
-
-EXTRACT FROM THE HISTORY OF BOGUS MASONRY AMONG COLORED MEN IN MISSOURI.
-
-By Capt. W. T. Grant, thirty-third degree Grand Master, St. Andrews
-Grand Lodge, A. F. & A. M. of the State of Louisiana, and President of
-the International Bureau of Masonic Information of the World, viz.:
-
-Seventh Question--Are you acquainted with Brother Chas. L. Mitchell, 33
-degree Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Texas?
-
-Seventh Answer--Yes. I am well acquainted with him. Bro. Chas. L.
-Mitchell is a Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Texas and is a
-prominent and distinguished Mason, and a very reliable and honest man.
-He is a man and Mason that stands high in the estimation of the people
-all over the country. He has the power and authority to organize Masonic
-Lodges in the State of Missouri, and all Masonic work done by him is
-regular and genuine, for there is not now a lawful and genuine Masonic
-Lodge, nor Grand Lodge in the State of Missouri, except the Lodges that
-Bro. Chas. L. Mitchell, 33d degree has organized.
-
-
-STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR.
-
-Personally came before me Chas. L. Mitchell, who being by me duly sworn,
-declares that he is the Grand Master of M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge
-of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Texas, and Masonic jurisdiction and
-acting under the instruction and authority of the M. W. King Solomon
-Grand Lodge of the State of Texas, and Masonic Jurisdiction; that
-affiant went to the State of Missouri and was in the city of St. Louis,
-Mo., on July 4, A. D., 1908, and affiant did in the city of St. Louis,
-Mo., on July 4, A. D., 1908, regularly obligate and Masonically set
-right according to the ancient custom, rules and regulation of the
-craft. Bro. J. J. Edwards, Henry J. Harbert, Sterling Grey, A. W.
-Prentiss, A. B. Shriver, E. J. Wade and others residing in the city of
-St. Louis, Mo., under the power and authority of the M. W. King Solomon
-Grand Lodge A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Texas and Masonic
-Jurisdiction.
-
-Officers of C. L. Mitchell Lodge No. 1, A. F. & A. Masons: J. J. Edwards
-W. M.; Henry J. Harbert, S. W.; B. Henderson, J. W.: S. Reed, W. T.; H.
-Newcomb, W. S.; Frank Dorsey, S. D.; E. J. Wade, J. D.: H. W. Prentess,
-S. S.; Milton Henderson, J. S.; A. B. Shriver, Chaplain; Sterling Grey,
-Tyler.
-
-Affiant further says that the C. L. Mitchell Lodge No. 1 of St. Louis,
-Mo., has been regularly organized in the City of St. Louis, Mo., on the
-fourth day of July, A. D., 1908, according to the Ancient custom and
-landmark of the Order, and it is recognized by us to be the only lawful
-and genuine Lodge of Colored Masons in the State of Missouri.
-
- C. L. MITCHELL. 33rd Degree G. M.,
- M. W. KING, Solomon Grand Lodge. A. F. & A. M. of Texas.
-
- Sworn to before me this 16th day of December, A. D., 1908.
- (Seal).
- L. W. GREENLY,
- Notary Public, Bexar County, Texas.
-
-
-LEGALIZING MASONS IN THE STATE OF ARKANSAS AUGUST 7, 8, 9 AND 10, 1908.
-
-To All Whom This May Concern, Greeting:
-
-Whereas, in the course of Masonic events it becomes necessary for one
-regular and legitimate Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons to heal and
-Masonically legalize Master Masons and Lodges and a Grand Lodge.
-
-Whereas, There was certain numbers of Masons, viz: R. Amos, Isaac
-Butler, M. F. Leon, H. C. Leon and their associates of the City of
-Montrose, Ark., J. C. Parker, R. B. Morehead, B. G. Head, A. W. Spears,
-R. B. Hockenhull and others of Pine Bluff, Ark., C. W. Ross, J. L. Brown
-and others of Readland, Ark., C. J. Jefferson, K. P. Ross. A. McDonald
-and others of Sun Shine, Ark., and several others in the State of
-Arkansas, C. W. Ross, E. E. Perryman, J. L. Brown and others of Eudora,
-Ark.
-
-Whereas application having been made by the above named brethren and
-their associates in the State of Arkansas, and the Masonic Lodges of
-which the above named brethren were members of in the State of Arkansas.
-The M. W. King Solomon, Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of
-Texas and Masonic jurisdiction to be Masonically legalized as Master
-Masons and members of various warranted Masonic Lodges in the State of
-Arkansas.
-
-Whereas, The M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Ma-kansas
-having been duly presented and considered in open session of the M. W.
-King Solomon Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Texas in
-special session held in the City of San Antonio, Texas, on the 4th day
-of August, A. D., 1908, and the prayer of the above named petitioners
-was then and there duly considered and unanimously granted.
-
-Whereas, The M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. M. Masons of
-the State of Texas and Masonic jurisdiction having in open session duly
-instructed and empowered the Grand Master of the M. W. King Solomon
-Grand Lodge of the A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Texas and Masonic
-jurisdiction to repair to the State of Arkansas and there proceed to
-Masonically legalize the Lodges and the above named brethren residing in
-the State of Arkansas, and to assist them in the formation and install
-the officers of the M. W. Hiram Grand Lodge, A. F. & A. Masons of the
-State of Arkansas.
-
-Therefore, be it known that I. C. L. Mitchell, 33rd degree of the City
-of San Antonio, State of Texas, and Grand Master of the M. W. King
-Solomon Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Texas and
-Masonic jurisdiction did in the City of Montrose, Ark., on the 7th day
-of August, A. D., 1908, did then and there under the instruction and
-authority of the M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge A. F. & A. Masons of the
-State of Texas did in said City of Montrose, Ark., on the 7th day of
-Aug. A. D., 1908, obligate and Masonically legalize the above named
-brethren and did Masonically legalize the subordinate Lodges in the
-State of Arkansas, and did assist and was present in the formation of
-the M. W. Hiram Grand Lodge of the A. F. & A. Masons of the State of
-Arkansas and did install Brothers Ralph Amos, M. W., Grand Master and
-J. C. Parker, Grand Secretary and the rest of the brethren as grand
-officers of the M. W. Hiram Grand Lodge of Arkansas according to the
-Masonic laws, rules and regulations of the craft.
-
-And, I, now do proclaim to the whole Masonic world that the M. W. Hiram
-Grand Lodge of the State of Arkansas of the A. F. & A. Masons has been
-regularly constituted according to laws, landmarks of Freemasonry. The
-M. W. King Solomon Grand Lodge of A. F. & A. Masons of the State of
-Texas and Masonic jurisdiction further declare that the M. W. Hiram
-Grand Lodge of the A. F. & A. Masons of the State of Arkansas is the
-only regular and lawful Grand Lodge of Colored Masons in the State of
-Arkansas.
-
- Fraternally Yours,
- C. L. MITCHELL 33rd Degree.
- Grand Master M. W. K. S. G. L., A. F. &. A. Masons of
- Texas and Masonic Jurisdiction.
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber's Note:
-
-Changes have been made to the original publication as follows:
-
- Preface:
- realized by my brethern _changed to_
- realized by my brethren
-
- styled--Illigitimate Prince Hall Grand Lodge _changed to_
- styled--Illegitimate Prince Hall Grand Lodge
-
- of the United States, its' _changed to_
- of the United States, its
-
- Page 1:
- neccessary to state the time and place that _changed to_
- necessary to state the time and place that
-
- that it occurrd _changed to_
- that it occurred
-
- Page 2:
- and these wiley fellows and _changed to_
- and these wily fellows and
-
- in the state of Mass _changed to_
- in the state of Mass.
-
- African Grand Lodge of Modern Mason of Mass. _changed to_
- African Grand Lodge of Modern Masons of Mass.
-
- Page 3:
- and genuine mason he it a _changed to_
- and genuine mason he is a
-
- land and in every coutry, _changed to_
- land and in every country,
-
- Page 4:
- letter "Y" originated, Prince Edwin _changed to_
- letter "Y" originated. Prince Edwin
-
- the Grand Lodge that was orgrnized at York _changed to_
- the Grand Lodge that was organized at York
-
- Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athlestan of _changed to_
- Prince Edwin, the brother of King Athelstan of England
-
- an eniment and distinguished Mason and King _changed to_
- an eminent and distinguished Mason and King
-
- Athlestan was the grandson of King Alfred the _changed to_
- Athelstan was the grandson of King Alfred the first
-
- annointed King of England who translated the _changed to_
- anointed King of England who translated the
-
- Page 6:
- valuminous articles _changed to_
- voluminous articles
-
- has on several occassion _changed to_
- has on several occasions
-
- refer to Genaral Gages Military Regiment being _changed to_
- refer to General Gages Military Regiment being
-
- And upon futher investigation of this matter _changed to_
- And upon further investigation of this matter
-
- General Gages Millitary Regiment which Prince Hall _changed to_
- General Gages Military Regiment which Prince Hall
-
- of the Grand Lodge of New York on Oct, 25th 1848 _changed to_
- of the Grand Lodge of New York on Oct. 25th 1848
-
- Page 7:
- documentry evidence that has ever
- documentary evidence that has ever
-
- Page 8:
- to you and the brethern in your country as to a _changed to_
- to you and the brethren in your country as to a
-
- Page 10:
- are admitted in any of the Masonic bodys _changed to_
- are admitted in any of the Masonic bodies
-
- Grand Lodges in This County and _changed to_
- Grand Lodges in This Country and
-
- Page 11:
- irregular and clandestine and predicted _changed to_
- irregular and clandestine and predicated
-
- nothing but breed dissention _changed to_
- nothing but breed dissension
-
- Page 12:
- and the second irrigeular _changed to_
- and the second irregular
-
- Page 15:
- Spingfield, Ill., Jos. H. Banks of Providence _changed to_
- Springfield, Ill., Jos. H. Banks of Providence
-
- Page 16:
- STATS WAS HELD AT OMAHA, NEB., MAY THE 10th _changed to_
- STATES WAS HELD AT OMAHA, NEB., MAY THE 10th
-
- Pennsylvaniia. The case came up before _changed to_
- Pennsylvanyia. The case came up before
-
- Page 17:
- Alfred the first annointed King of England who _changed to_
- Alfred the first anointed King of England who
-
- Page 18:
- after Mount Bonnel Lodge was _changed to_
- after Mount Bonnell Lodge was
-
- that was Mounte Bonnell Lodge at Austin _changed to_
- that was Mount Bonnell Lodge at Austin
-
- Cuny was elected Grand Master and J. J. Hamilton was _changed to_
- Cuney was elected Grand Master and J. J. Hamilton was
-
- of since its was instituted in an _changed to_
- of since it was instituted in an
-
- Page 20
- 24th day of June Amo _changed to_
- 24th day of June Anno
-
- North America, this 24th day of June Amo _changed to_
- North America, this 24th day of June Anno
-
- Page 21
- bigus, counterfeit grand body, and _changed to_
- bogus, counterfeit grand body, and
-
- Grand Master and Grand Wardens, and brethern
- Grand Master and Grand Wardens, and brethren
-
- Page 22
- brethern and their successors to have and _changed to_
- brethren and their successors to have and
-
- brethern and their successors in office to _changed to_
- brethren and their successors in office to
-
- brethern and their successors to have _changed to_
- brethren and their successors to have
-
- brethern to attend the Most Worshipful _changed to_
- brethren to attend the Most Worshipful
-
- the officers and brethern of said Grand _changed to_
- the officers and brethren of said Grand
-
- Page 23
- CHICAGO, SEPT, 4th, 1877. _changed to_
- CHICAGO, SEPT., 4th, 1877.
-
- Page 24
- by this grand Lodge. _changed to_
- by this Grand Lodge.
-
- Page 25
- Accepted Scottinsh Rite _changed to_
- Accepted Scottish Rite
-
- degree it is suprious and _changed to_
- degree it is spurious and
-
- Page 26
- by organizing Mt. Bonnel Lodge _changed to_
- by organizing Bonnell Lodge
-
- with N. W. Cuny as the _changed to_
- with N. W. Cuney as the
-
- succeeded N. W. Cuny as Grand _changed to_
- succeeded N. W. Cuney as Grand
-
- that was held in Pittsburg, Pa. _changed to_
- that was held in Pittsburgh, Pa.
-
- Bro. W. T. Grant,, _changed to_
- Bro. W. T. Grant,
-
- Page 27
- regular and legitmate Grand Lodge of _changed to_
- regular and legitimate Grand Lodge of
-
- Chas. L. W. L. Dorn, J. F. VanDuzor _changed to_
- Chas. L., W. L. Dorn, J. F. VanDuzor
-
- Page 28
- charges were prefrred against _changed to_
- charges were preferred against
-
- Page 29
- MOUNT CALVARY GRAND COMMANDRY, KNIGHT _changed to_
- MOUNT CALVARY GRAND COMMANDERY, KNIGHT
-
- warranted Commandrys of Knight Templars in _changed to_
- warranted Commanderies of Knight Templars in the
-
- organized the Mount Calvary Grand Commandry _changed to_
- organized the Mount Calvary Grand Commandery of Knight
-
- Commandreys of Knight Templars are hereby _changed to_
- Commanderies of Knight Templars are hereby
-
- Page 31
- street San Antonio; _changed to_
- Street, San Antonio;
-
- Page 33
- regulations of the craft, _changed to_
- regulations of the craft.
-
- Page 32 The text has been transcribed as in the original
- publication but words appear to be missing between
- "Ma-" and "kansas" which is split at the end of a
- line in the original
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Early Introduction of Bogus
-Freemasonry in the United States of America and Texas Among Colored Masons, by Charles L. Mitchell
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EARLY INTRODUCTION OF ***
-
-***** This file should be named 40234.txt or 40234.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/4/0/2/3/40234/
-
-Produced by Bryan Ness and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
-will be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
-one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
-(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
-permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
-set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
-copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
-protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
-Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
-charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
-do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
-rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
-such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
-research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
-practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
-subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
-redistribution.
-
-
-
-*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
-http://gutenberg.org/license).
-
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
-all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
-If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
-terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
-entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
-and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
-or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
-collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
-individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
-located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
-copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
-works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
-are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
-Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
-freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
-this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
-the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
-keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
-a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
-the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
-before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
-creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
-Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
-the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
-States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
-access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
-whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
-copied or distributed:
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
-from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
-posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
-and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
-or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
-with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
-work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
-through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
-Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
-1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
-terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
-to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
-permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
-word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
-distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
-"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
-posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
-you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
-copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
-request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
-form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
-that
-
-- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
- owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
- has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
- Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
- must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
- prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
- returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
- sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
- address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
- the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or
- destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
- and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
- Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
- money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
- of receipt of the work.
-
-- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
-forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
-both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
-Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
-Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
-collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
-"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
-corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
-property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
-computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
-your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
-your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
-the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
-refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
-providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
-receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
-is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
-opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
-WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
-WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
-If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
-law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
-interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
-the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
-provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
-with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
-promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
-harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
-that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
-or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
-work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
-Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
-
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
-including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
-because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
-people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
-To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
-and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
-Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
-http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
-permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
-Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
-throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
-809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
-business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
-information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
-page at http://pglaf.org
-
-For additional contact information:
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
-SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
-particular state visit http://pglaf.org
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
-To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
-
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
-with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
-Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
-
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
-unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
-keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
-
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
-
- http://www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.