summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/40211-h/40211-h.htm
blob: e72fb26ca733116f3701ce39b6a6ba9251301127 (plain) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!DOCTYPE html
   PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd" >

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>
      Church Reform, by Richard Carlile.
    </title>
    <style type="text/css" xml:space="preserve">
    
    body { margin:5%; background:#faebd0; text-align:justify}
    P { text-indent: 1em; margin-top: .25em; margin-bottom: .25em; }
    H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; margin-left: 15%; margin-right: 15%; }
    hr  { width: 50%; text-align: center;}
    .foot { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; text-align: justify; text-indent: -3em; font-size: 90%; }
    blockquote {font-size: 97%; font-style: italic; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}
    .mynote    {background-color: #DDE; color: #000; padding: .5em; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 95%;}
    .toc       { margin-left: 10%; margin-bottom: .75em;}
    .toc2      { margin-left: 20%;}
    div.fig    { display:block; margin:0 auto; text-align:center; }
    div.middle { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; text-align: justify; }
    .figleft   {float: left; margin-left: 0%; margin-right: 1%;}
    .figright  {float: right; margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 1%;}
    .pagenum   {display:inline; font-size: 70%; font-style:normal;
               margin: 0; padding: 0; position: absolute; right: 1%;
               text-align: right;}
    pre        { font-style: italic; font-size: 90%; margin-left: 10%;}
    
</style>
  </head>
<body>
<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 40211 ***</div>
    <div style="height: 8em;">
      <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
    </div>
    <h1>
      CHURCH REFORM:
    </h1>
    <h3>
      THE ONLY MEANS TO THAT END,<br /> STATED IN A LETTER TO Sir ROBERT PEEL,
      Bart.<br /> FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY, &amp;c.
    </h3>
    <h2>
      By Richard Carlile.
    </h2>
    <p>
      <br />
    </p>
    <h3>
      TO WHICH IS PREFACED A CORRESPONDENCE<br /> WITH THE BISHOP OF LONDON ON
      THE SAME SUBJECT.
    </h3>
    <p>
      <br /> <br />
    </p>
    <hr />
    <p>
      <br /> <br />
    </p>
    <blockquote>
      <p class="toc">
        <big><b>CONTENTS</b></big>
      </p>
      <p>
        <br />
      </p>
      <p class="toc">
        <a href="#link2H_PREF"> PREFACE. </a>
      </p>
      <p class="toc">
        <a href="#link2H_4_0002"> LETTER TO SIR ROBERT PEEL </a>
      </p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>
      <br /> <br />
    </p>
    <hr />
    <p>
      <br /> <br /> <a name="link2H_PREF" id="link2H_PREF">
      <!--  H2 anchor --> </a>
    </p>
    <h2>
      PREFACE.
    </h2>
    <h3>
      CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE BISHOP OF LONDON,<br /> IN 1833, ON THE SUBJECT OF
      A REFORM IN THE CHURCH.
    </h3>
    <p>
      <br />
    </p>
    <p>
      "To the Right Reverend Father in God, the Lord Bishop of London.
    </p>
    <p>
      "62, Fleet Street, November 18,1833.
    </p>
    <p>
      "My Lord,
    </p>
    <p>
      "I have long and deliberately thought, that the state of the Country, the
      state of the Church, and the state of the Public Mind in relation to the
      Church, calls upon me to offer myself for an interview with your Lordship,
      as my Diocesan, that your Lordship may hear from me what I have to advance
      against the present state and condition of the Church, and what I have to
      propose as an immediately necessary and proper Reform.
    </p>
    <p>
      "I offer to wait on your Lordship, with your Lordship's consent; and
      promise, that my conversation shall be altogether courteous and
      reasonable.
    </p>
    <p>
      "I am one of your Lordship's scattered sheep, wishing for the fold of a
      good shepherd,&mdash;(which is Christ Jesus),&mdash;
    </p>
    <p>
      "RICHARD CARLILE."
    </p>
    <p>
      "P. S.&mdash;I may add, my Lord Bishop, that I am altogether a Christian;
      save the mark at which superstition has been planted upon Christianity."
    </p>
    <hr />
    <p>
      "Fulham, November 20,1833.
    </p>
    <p>
      "Sir,
    </p>
    <p>
      "I have to acknowledge the receipt of your letter, in which you propose an
      interview with me, for the purpose of making known to me your opinions
      respecting the present state of the Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      "I beg to say, that I shall be ready to receive, and to give all due
      consideration to any communication which you may think proper to make me
      in writing; as being, on many accounts, a more convenient method than that
      of personal conference.
    </p>
    <p>
      "I remain, Sir,
    </p>
    <p>
      "Your obedient Servant,
    </p>
    <p>
      "C. J. LONDON."
    </p>
    <hr />
    <p>
      "To the Right Reverend Father in God, the Lord Bishop of London.
    </p>
    <p>
      "62, Fleet Street, November 24,1833.
    </p>
    <p>
      "My Lord Bishop,
    </p>
    <p>
      "In answer to my proposal to meet your Lordship in conversation, on the
      state of the Country, the state of the Church, and the state of the Public
      Mind with relation to the Church, your Lordship has encouraged me to write
      what I have to say, and has promised to receive it and to give it due
      consideration. I write as early as my circumstances have afforded me the
      necessary leisure and composure of mind.
    </p>
    <p>
      "The first point to which I beg leave to call your Lordship's attention is&mdash;that
      there is a very numerous degree of dissent from the Established Church
      among the people of this country.
    </p>
    <p>
      "The second point is, that this spirit of dissent has led to a very
      extended opposition to the support of the Church in its fiscal claims.
    </p>
    <p>
      "The third point is, that there is a preparation of a public mind going
      forward for the putting of the present Established Church on the same
      footing as the present Establishments of the Dissenters&mdash;the footing
      of voluntary rather than legal support; and that the preparation of this
      state of mind is accelerated by the embarrassed state of the country.
    </p>
    <p>
      "The evidence of these three points in prospect is, that the present state
      of the Church will be entirely overthrown in the course of two or three
      Sessions of Parliament.
    </p>
    <p>
      "On the principle of dissent from the Established Church, I have to
      observe, that it is desirable there should be no dissent; but then the
      Church should be invulnerable. There can be no popular dissent from any
      Institution that can be defended as good and best; and though I am
      instructed to allow that the general body of dissenters from the Church
      have dissented on very frivolous, even on indefensible grounds, (inasmuch
      as the Dissenters have not corrected in themselves the errors of the
      Church), there still remains the proof that where the Church has been
      assailed or dissented from, it has not been in a condition to defend and
      justify itself.
    </p>
    <p>
      "This incapability of the Church to defend and justify itself, where
      assailed, must have arisen from a defective state of its doctrine and
      discipline.
    </p>
    <p>
      "This doctrine and discipline is founded upon the literal reading of the
      Sacred Scriptures, or the books of the Old and New Testament.
    </p>
    <p>
      "I impugn the literal as an erroneous reading: it claims to be local and
      temporal history, and is not. Not one of its apparent historical subjects
      can be verified. Every one of them can be falsified, upon the principle
      that other things were being done at the time, and that other people dwelt
      in the places; and that nothing of contemporary character, purporting to
      be history, has corroborated the historical claims of the Old and New
      Testament.
    </p>
    <p>
      "It is said of the writings of the Old and New Testament, that they are
      allegorical, and that they contain the moral of human salvation from evil.
      Under this view, they may be true, and may be important as a matter of
      instruction. I so believe them to be true, and to be important as a matter
      of instruction; but as your Lordship may put me on the task of mentioning
      some particular facts and grounds on which I impugn the literal reading of
      the Sacred Scriptures, and may properly suggest that it is necessary this
      ground should be first cleared before we try them on the other ground, I
      submit, as two well-weighed and conclusive propositions:&mdash;
    </p>
    <p>
      "1st. That the person of Jesus Christ, or the name, is not in mention by
      any author of the first century, if the passage in Josephus be excepted as
      an interpolation; and that this defect in the evidence is fatal to the
      historical claim.
    </p>
    <p>
      "2nd. That the people called Jews, or Israelites, neither formed colony
      nor nation in that part of the earth which is now called Judea, or Holy
      Land, before the time of Alexander of Macedon; consequently all that is
      said of their dwelling in and going out of Egypt, their sojourn in the
      Wilderness, their warfare with the Canaanites and Philistines, their
      occupation of that country, their subsequent conquest, captivity, and
      restoration, is entirely fiction or allegory.
    </p>
    <p>
      "I read it as political and moral instruction veiled in allegory \ and as
      it is to be desired, that, in the removal of a system, all its defects be
      made apparent, so it becomes a desideratum, that we account for the origin
      of the sects named Jews and Christians.
    </p>
    <p>
      "This may be done in two ways&mdash;-one, that they were public
      philosophical sects; the other, that they were degrees of order in the
      ancient mysteries.
    </p>
    <p>
      "The moral of the allegory belonging to each is throughout the same, and
      is an encouragement to the resistance and overthrow of the tyranny of man,
      when it appears in the open authority of a King, or in the covert
      authority of a Priest; and the preparing of a people to do this, and the
      doing it, is precisely what is meant by human salvation,&mdash;which is a
      sure and certain salvation from earthly evils.
    </p>
    <p>
      "The absence of a proof of personal identity in the characters sketched in
      the Old and New Testament, is the presence of proof (if utility of any
      kind there be in the form of the allegory), that the persons mentioned are
      like what all the gods and goddesses of ancient religion were&mdash;personifications
      of principles, either physical or moral, or both.
    </p>
    <p>
      "In so receiving the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, I find them
      pregnant with the most important political and moral instruction. In
      receiving them according to the literal or historical reading, I find
      difficulties insuperable, and such as justify all that Thomas Paine or any
      other straightforward critic has advanced on the subject, while the moral
      and the allegory were concealed from their view.
    </p>
    <p>
      "The point at which this personification of principles begins, is the
      point at which superstition begins; for though knowledge may justify the
      poetic licence taken with language, ignorance mistakes and evil design
      misrepresents, until the personification is extensively dwelt on as a
      reality.
    </p>
    <p>
      "Here I trace the fundamental errors of the present doctrine and
      discipline of the Established Church; the errors upon which dissent has
      progressed, upon which an outcry of infidelity has been raised, but upon
      which the Church could not defend itself and maintain its position.
    </p>
    <p>
      "My remedy for the present difficulties, and my proposition \ for a Reform
      in the Church is, that no difficulties, mysteries, or superstition be
      allowed to remain attached to its doctrines and discipline; that the
      allegory of the Sacred Scriptures be avowed, the personifications taught
      upon their principles as known principles of nature, and not as
      personified incomprehensibilities; that the Church, in short, be made a
      school for the people, than which, if it originally meant any good thing,
      could mean no other thing, where from time to time all acquired or
      acquirable knowledge should be taught. On this ground, the utility of the
      Institution is evident, the benefit to the people certain, the idea of
      dissent inadmissible.
    </p>
    <p>
      "In this first letter, I have thought it necessary only to give your
      Lordship the leading points of objection to the present doctrine and
      discipline of the Church. With details in proof, I can proceed to a
      voluminous length; and I now offer myself to submit to the catechism of
      your Lordship, or to that of any person whom your Lordship shall appoint
      to see me, with the distinct promise, that I will not evade the giving of
      a direct answer to any distinct and intelligible question that can be put
      to me upon any part of this important subject.
    </p>
    <p>
      "It may not be improper that I now declare to your Lordship, that, after
      having worn out the spirit of persecution by a large amount of personal
      and pecuniary suffering, I have never been acting upon any other motive
      than a love of truth, and honesty, and public good; that it is under such
      a motive, and no other mixed motive, that I have now presented myself to
      your Lordship, viewing your Lordship as a public functionary that has
      inherited and not created the error of which I complain; and hoping that I
      shall be met with the disposition of a fair investigation, when so much
      good is at this moment the promised consequence,
    </p>
    <p>
      "I am, My Lord,
    </p>
    <p>
      "Your Lordship's most obedient humble servant,
    </p>
    <p>
      "RICHARD CARLILE." <br /> <br />
    </p>
    <hr />
    <p>
      <br /> <br /> <a name="link2H_4_0002" id="link2H_4_0002">
      <!--  H2 anchor --> </a>
    </p>
    <h2>
      LETTER TO SIR ROBERT PEEL
    </h2>
    <p>
      <br />
    </p>
    <p>
      Sir,
    </p>
    <p>
      I write as a politician to a politician, with oblivion of the past,
      without any profession of respect for the present, waiting and watching
      your future.
    </p>
    <p>
      I am stimulated to address you, and the country through your name, on
      reading your Address to the Electors of Tamworth, after taking the offices
      of First Lord of the Treasury and Chancellor of the Exchequer.
    </p>
    <p>
      The portion of your Address which I select as my subject, is that relating
      to the Church&mdash;the first of all political subjects. Not to understand
      how to deal with this, is to be utterly deficient in every other political
      branch. Not to reform this, is to reform nothing. State ever did, and ever
      will, depend upon the Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      As far as your individual promise is sufficient, it is, that Church Rates
      shall be abolished. This is so far good. It has been a disgrace to all
      parties concerned, and an injury to every housekeeper, that a Church Rate
      has existed. Such a rate has existed only because of the dishonest
      application of that Church Property which was the legitimate supply for
      all Church Buildings and repairs. And should the rate be continued under
      any other form of taxation, and not supplied from existing Church
      Property, an injury and an injustice will still be inflicted upon the
      people.
    </p>
    <p>
      You seem willing to abate the religious ceremony of marriage, so far as to
      allow each couple to let it be to its liking. Pray go a step farther, and
      let the law cease to trammel that civil contract with religious ceremony,
      while each couple will be at liberty of its own accord to go through
      whatever religious ceremony it may think proper. And while on this
      subject, I pray you to give, or seek for the poor, justice in facile
      divorce. The mystery of marriage is too sacred for constraint. It should
      never be other than a spirit of pure and mutual liberty and consent,
      subject to some legal recognition for the care of offspring. Much of the
      morals of society must depend on the freedom of marriage and facility of
      divorce. We have not hitherto been right on this subject. That can be no
      good tie which opposes the will of an individual in so sacred and delicate
      an affair as that of marriage. The beginning, middle, and end of marriage
      should be the love of affection and friendship. Marriage should cease when
      affection between the parties has ceased. It may be truly added, that
      marriage has morally ceased, when affection has ceased. Then the legal tie
      becomes an abomination, a source of vice and wrong; and, in nine cases out
      of ten, the religious ceremony is treated as a burlesque, save the idea,
      that it is a fashionable distinction to have observed it as the chief
      criterion of legal marriage.
    </p>
    <p>
      I entirely agree with you, that Church Property should not be alienated
      from strictly ecclesiastical purposes. I have changed my view, and see
      more than formerly on this head.
    </p>
    <p>
      For the same reason, I entirely disagree with you on any commutation of
      tithes. Let the original application be restored, and no one will find
      fault but he who loses by that just principle, that first and best of
      Church Property and most important of popular rights.
    </p>
    <p>
      The point, in your address, on which my letter is to be based, is the
      following paragraph:&mdash;
    </p>
    <p>
      "With regard to alterations in the laws which govern our ecclesiastical
      establishment, I have had no recent opportunity of giving that grave
      consideration to a subject of the deepest interest, which could alone
      justify me in making any public declaration of opinion. It is a subject
      which must undergo the fullest deliberation, and into that deliberation
      the Government will enter with the sincerest desire to remove every abuse
      that can impair the efficiency of the Establishment, extend the sphere of
      its usefulness, and to strengthen and confirm its just claims upon the
      respect and affections of the people."
    </p>
    <p>
      This is just what I wanted you to say. It is honest, if you will but act
      up to it. This is the sort of Church Reform that I propose. Here we have
      from you, as the Chief Minister, a promise that your Administration will
      enter into the fullest deliberation, with the sincerest desire to remove
      every abuse that can impair the efficiency of the Church Establishment,
      extend the sphere of its usefulness, and strengthen and confirm its just
      claims upon the respect and affections of the people. Had I been called to
      your situation, I could not have promised more; but I should have acted up
      to that promise, and I hope you will so act. In the performance of that
      promise, everlasting fame will be yours. So act&mdash;and greater than the
      name of Lycurgus or Solon&mdash;greater than that of Cicero, Constantine,
      or Napoleon&mdash;greater than the name of any past man will be that of
      Robert Peel. If the Duke of Wellington join you in this sentiment, and
      goes manly and honestly forward to its accomplishment, his, too, will be
      an imperishable name. This would wreathe him an evergreen chaplet, that
      would survive the memory of all his physical victories! This is the great
      moral victory to be obtained before any society can settle down into
      peace, welfare, and happiness:&mdash;<i>the best use that can be made of
      the Church</i>. It is a subject of the deepest interest; it requires grave
      consideration; I pray that it may have that consideration. I pray that I
      may be heard by a Commission, in grave consideration of that subject of
      the deepest interest, before any legislative change be entered upon. I put
      myself forward in this letter. Many will be the schemes proposed to your
      consideration: let mine be one, and then select and improve the best.
    </p>
    <p>
      The first consideration is&mdash;What is now the Church? What are its
      defects? What the cause of that dissent, which has made a revision
      necessary?
    </p>
    <p>
      The second consideration will be&mdash;What ought the Church to be, so as
      to leave no ground and reason of dissent? To some minds, the fickleness
      and fallibility of human nature will appear as an insurmountable obstacle
      to the construction of such a Church. I see farther and will propose in
      order.
    </p>
    <p>
      I flatter myself that I am writing this letter with very proper feelings
      toward all institutions and all persons. I suspend, <i>pro tem</i>., all
      quarrels that I have with all men, to assist you in this common good, in
      which you deserve and will have, in the ratio of their goodness, the
      assistance of all good men. If I can sink the past in oblivion for common
      good, who should say he cannot? To the altar and shrine of that Reformed
      Church, which you contemplate, I have sacrificed property much&mdash;all I
      had, and years of liberty many. I am still worshipping, still so
      sacrificing, both property and personal liberty, and will so continue to
      the end. I say it not boastfully; but in comparative claim to attention,
      and in encouragement and example of union to assist you in the performance
      of your present promise.
    </p>
    <p>
      Let me be permitted to say, too, that the Church is a subject which I have
      studied in its origin, its history, its first principle, all its dissent
      or variation from that first principle, down to its present standing. I
      have so studied it, that I cannot now find author or preacher who can
      present me any thing new as to its general merits, past or present. This
      is the chief ground on which I solicit your and the public attention to my
      view of this subject of Church Reform. I presume to know what the Church
      is, and what it ought to be.
    </p>
    <p>
      It may be taken as a point to be yielded by all parties, that the desire
      with regard to the Law Established Church is, the removal of all ground of
      dissent, so as not to leave it a mere sectarian Church, which any mere
      abatement of existing dissenting objections will do. No Dissenter can
      complain, if the ground of his dissent be removed from the Church. And if
      there be no ground of future dissent left, there can be no future
      complaint, no new dissension arising. Without the absence of the
      possibility of dissent, there can be no just holding and application of a
      public and common property for the business of the Church. With that
      absence, the property is justly held and applied. Any law that recognizes
      and tolerates the Dissenter, recognizes and tolerates the justness of his
      dissent, and calls for the primary justice of removing the ground of
      dissent. No man can reasonably say, <i>let us not be of one Church</i>;
      but every man can reasonably say, <i>let the Church be purified of its
      errors</i>; and while any man can show an error, it is his duty to call
      for the purification, and the duty of authorities to attend to his call
      and to purify. A permanent Church then must be an improving,
      self-purifying Church, and continue a true picture of the best state of
      the human mind, meeting every well-founded and majority-decided call upon
      its utility.
    </p>
    <p>
      Any idea of keeping up a Law Established Church with public property,
      surrounded by Dissenting Churches, without a public property, can enter
      the head of no man who understands the subject. There can be no peace or
      final settlement under such an arrangement. The effect to be accomplished
      is, not to break up the Church Property; but to break up the Dissenters
      from the Church. This will startle the present state of mind and feeling.
      I propose no abridgement of equal liberty. Is not this the grand <i>desideratum?</i>
      Can it be accomplished?&mdash;I think it can, and so proceed to unfold the
      two-fold consideration.
    </p>
    <p>
      First.&mdash;What is now the Church? What are its defects? What the cause
      of that dissent which has made a revision necessary?
    </p>
    <p>
      This, in reality, is but one question, with a three-fold expression.
    </p>
    <p>
      The Church is now the Theatre of the Drama of the Books of Common Prayer,
      the Thirty-nine Articles, and the Old and New Testament; to which is
      generally added a sermonic epilogue or exhortation, commonly called a
      Sermon.
    </p>
    <p>
      Be not offended at my use of the word <i>Theatre</i> here: no other would
      substitute. Its root is the Greek [&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;], God, and
      signified originally, the house, place or stage, where the Drama of Theism
      or attributes of Deity were exhibited. The word is now much distorted from
      its root, in being made to describe the place of modern dramatic
      performances.
    </p>
    <p>
      Nor must the word <i>Drama</i> be objected to; because the ceremony of the
      Church was originally so constructed, so meant, and so practised, as I
      will prove in the course of this letter.
    </p>
    <p>
      Even the word <i>Tragedy</i> has its root in the Greek word [&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;],
      a goat, and signifies, in the dramatic exhibition of Theism, the death of
      the year, under the form of a personification, in the twelfth or zodiacal
      month of the goat. So that the death sorrowed for and lamented, was,
      dramatically, the apparent death of the sun, the death of the year, in the
      sign or month of the goat; and on St. Thomas's day, as we read in the
      Prophet Ezekiel, chap. viii. v. 14&mdash;"<i>and behold there sat women
      weeping for Tammuz;</i>" and v. 16&mdash;"<i>about five and twenty men,
      with their backs toward the temple of the Lord, and their faces toward the
      east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east</i>," which is no other
      than a representation of the performance of the tragedy, in which the
      performers had lost the moral of the Lord's Temple: precisely the present
      state and condition of the Church. All ancient mythology is in harmony
      with this conclusion; and the Christian tragedy is only a continued
      version, uniting the general drama of human morals with the annual tragedy
      of solar physics, and forming a two-fold or two-keyed allegory or mystery,
      physical and moral, as it was known even in the Celtic or Druid Church.
      Christianity was never new, or young, in this country, by existing
      records.
    </p>
    <p>
      There are not many persons in this secret, perhaps, not even you, the
      first Minister of the country; so it will be deemed too abstruse and
      mystical on which to find a warrant for legislation or change of law: but
      I strenuously maintain, that such was the origin of the Christian Church,
      and such is now its generally lost meaning. The proof of the solar part of
      the allegory is not so much to my present purpose as the proof of the
      general drama of human morals being the basis of the present mystery of
      the Christian Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      To stay a growing difficulty, we must go to the root:&mdash;it will grow
      again, if we do not go to the root. It will be so with the present Church,
      and all attempts to reform it.
    </p>
    <p>
      In plainer language, then, I will describe the existing Church, as having,
      in its ceremonies and business, the mystery of the Christian Religion,
      without its revelation; that all the defects and all the grounds of
      dissent from it are the absence of the revelation, or want of knowing the
      meaning of the mystery. Whatever are called its doctrines, are all
      mysterious; its discipline is equally mysterious, and by its present
      ministers, unaccountable. Dissenters have dissented without being able to
      assign a reason for their dissent, and have set up for themselves
      something equally mysterious and unaccountable; and so the whole principle
      and practice of Religion in the country is in confusion and conflict; and
      no measure can reconcile the dissentients, short of developing the first
      principles of the Church and the Christian Religion, the one language, the
      one course of reason, the one ground of human welfare, the one system of
      morals, which is now buried in a Babel of confused tongues, doctrines,
      idol-houses, and superstitious ceremonies.
    </p>
    <p>
      The ground, then, on which I proceed, is, that TO REFORM THE CHURCH, THE
      DISSENTERS MUST BE ANNIHILATED.
    </p>
    <p>
      Not annihilated by slaughter or physical force; but by superior knowledge,
      and consequent superior teaching, by openness, by honesty, by throwing off
      the mask of hypocrisy, and leaving the Church of Christ to be no longer a
      theatre of dramatic ceremony in mystery, with parts and actors as ignorant
      as automata of their subject, and who not knowing, can value it not,
      beyond the salaries they receive for its performance in unrevealed
      mystery.
    </p>
    <p>
      Can that be a Reform of the Church, with "just claims upon the respect and
      affections of the people," which shall leave a ground and excuse for
      dissent by any one of the people? I say, NO. Can it be a Church of Christ?
      I say, NO. Do we know what a Church of Christ is in reality? For myself, I
      say, YES. A Church, too, founded upon an understanding of the <i>Sacred</i>
      Scriptures, of the Old and New Testament, upon the revelation of the
      mystery of those Scriptures, and upon all the first principles essential
      and conducive to general human and social welfare; that shall no more
      admit of dissent than the multiplication table, or the accurately placed
      sun-dial, than the elements of Euclid, and all the never-failing tests of
      the science of chemistry. The Apostle that told us to "<i>prove all
      things, and hold fast that which is good</i>," gave us a definition of the
      exhortation of the Evangelist or the Baptist&mdash;"<i>Repent, for the
      kingdom of Heaven is at hand</i>." A repenting and a proving people are
      necessary to make a Church of Christ. Repentance and enquiry are the
      pillars and foundations of that Church; without repentance and enquiry
      there can be no Church of Christ; and I ask, confidently ask, with the
      assurance that a true answer must be in the negative,&mdash;has anything
      calling itself a Christian Church in Europe, established by law, or
      dissenting from such an establishment, anything to do with the two
      principles of repentance and proving, the one meaning reflection by
      animadversion, the other a trial by outward tests of that reflection?
      There is not a congregation of people in Europe, calling itself a Church,
      that is founded upon an understanding of the Sacred Scriptures, the
      understanding which shows that the "letter killeth, but the spirit giveth
      life."
    </p>
    <p>
      I impugn, as being in error,&mdash;I denounce, as that error is the cause
      of all dissent, of dissent uninstructed,&mdash;all the churches or
      congregations called churches in the British dominions; and I call for a
      reform that shall eradicate that dissent, and make all become one in
      efficiency, usefulness, and respect and affections of the people.
    </p>
    <p>
      The present state of the Church is, that it is a theatre of mystery,
      giving no solid satisfaction to the people, and for which, among the
      receivers of salaries and benefits only, can there be a particle of real
      respect and affection. Its defects are, that none understand, neither
      priests nor people understand what any part of its dramatic ceremonies
      mean. And this is the cause of that dissent which has made a revision
      necessary.
    </p>
    <p>
      What, then, ought the Church to be, so as to have no ground and reason of
      dissent?
    </p>
    <p>
      In two words, I answer, A SCHOOL.
    </p>
    <p>
      What kind of a school?
    </p>
    <p>
      A school for knowledge only; for revelation without mystery; and for
      practical use and benefit to every member, without parade or pomp, even
      without ceremony, beyond what order and good may require.
    </p>
    <p>
      And would such be a Church of Christ?
    </p>
    <p>
      Such alone can be a Church of Christ. Christ the Logos, Jesus the Saviour
      of Man, is, in principle, nothing more in its dramatic or mystified and
      present church presentation, than a personification of the principle of
      reason, or of the knowledge of which the human being is a recipient, and
      without which can have no salvation, has no relation to the idea of a
      salvation, or any evil from which to be saved. Such is a true revelation
      of the mystery of Christ.
    </p>
    <p>
      And a Church of Christ has no other true meaning, than a convenient and
      sessional gathering of the people in districts, for purposes of mutual
      enquiry and mutual instruction; for catechism and intelligible and useful
      exhortation; for revelation of knowledge, or mind, or reason; for mental
      improvement; and not for mystery, nor dramatic ceremony, nor superstition,
      nor idolatry. It is in this sense only, that the Church of Christ is
      superior to all other Churches&mdash;the word Church meaning a gathering
      or association of the people for mental improvement.
    </p>
    <p>
      This generation has no proof, nor has history a warrant, that any other
      generation of man has had a proof of the material existence of the being
      called Jesus Christ. The seeming narrative of such a purport is the
      current mythology of the ancients, or people of two thousand years ago,
      taken up by us in its literal sense, and so mistaken; so mistaken, as to
      warrant a belief in the literality and fact of the material, temporal, and
      local existence of every one of the Gods of the Pantheon, or of human
      imagination, and then we shall have rivalry enough for the best. But then,
      I should make a choice of Christ, as the only one that makes due provision
      for the right cultivation of the human mind; the only one that has laid
      the foundations of the kingdom of Heaven, in the peace and good-will of
      mankind, dwelling upon a land flowing with milk and honey, and overflowing
      with knowledge.
    </p>
    <p>
      I challenge the Bishops and the whole priesthood, to produce me any
      knowledge that is intelligible to themselves or to any other person, as an
      interpretation of the narratives in the Old and New Testament, about
      Jehovah or Christ, other than that which I am now unfolding. Mine has a
      warrant in the spirit of the language of the books, in the roots of words,
      and in all the principles of things that relate to man's welfare; and more
      particularly in that to man most important of all, MORAL SCIENCE.
    </p>
    <p>
      I am not insensible to the circumstance, that a man might have a knowledge
      of a thing, of a train of circumstances, of causes and effects, in his own
      mind, with a difficulty to find language in which to communicate it, that
      shall be equally and immediately clear to all other states of mind. A
      resemblance, nearness, or similarity of mind, almost an equality of
      knowledge, is requisite to a clear understanding. It is thus, that men, in
      different languages, understand each other, when other men, bystanders, do
      not understand them. And it so happens, in all first developments of
      science, the new discovery wants a new language in which to be presented
      to others, and it often happens, that first words made or chosen are not
      the best and clearest.
    </p>
    <p>
      Know you not, Sir, that knowledge is power? You must have read that
      celebrated axiom of Bacon's; but have you considered it, have you
      reflected, have you repented and proved that axiom? I may add, by way of
      explanation, that knowledge is the only moral power. What seeks your
      Church to be? Or what should it seek to be, other than a moral power? On
      what rock, then, must the Church of Christ be built, so that the gates of
      hell, or of evil design, or of dissent, may not prevail against it? On
      what, but KNOWLEDGE? Is it now so built? Is not, rather, the present
      ministry of the Church more afraid of knowledge than of the people's
      ignorant dissent; more of "Carlile and his crew," than of all the
      dissenters; more of free discussion, than of any kind of superstition? The
      dissent of knowledge and the dissent of ignorance, though disunited, are
      becoming too powerful for your knowledgeless Church; and you, at last,
      have consented to speak of its necessary reform! To which will you yield,
      or whom will you join? Those who dissent by knowledge, or those by
      ignorance? If you take the former, your work will be perfected at once; if
      the latter, your work will never be done, and you will become weaker and
      weaker; for I know not one body of worshipping associated dissenters,
      whose ground of association and dissent is better than that of the
      Established Church. Find me the minister of one of them, who will stand up
      in discussion before a public audience with me, so as to have his language
      reported. I have not yet found him in England or Scotland. The pretences
      of the kind that have been made, have been so deficient in respectability
      of character and of good manners, that I do not think them worth a
      recognition.
    </p>
    <p>
      I am not insensible to the circumstance, that you have a difficult task to
      perform, and I am not sure that you are equal to it: I hope you are; that
      is, I would have you so, or any other who may be the King's adviser, and
      the real head of the Church. Nothing is wanted for this reform but honesty
      and moral courage. Where the will and the power exist, the task is an easy
      one. <i>I desire to save the Church and its property, and to annihilate
      the Dissenters</i>. I would have the present dignities of the Church
      dignify themselves in a triumph over the Dissenters. A collusion with the
      Dissenters will be a hugging of pestilence and death to the bosom of the
      Church. There can be no co-existence: there was proof enough of that in
      the seventeenth century, and still in Scotland. A revolution in the
      affairs and manners of the Church must take place, even by your own
      confession, in language admitting of the inference; and I desire that good
      may be educed from that revolution. I would make the Church triumph in the
      correction of every mental error in the country, and noble would be that
      triumph!
    </p>
    <p>
      You may ask, how is this to be done? I will tell you. Let the Church
      become the oracle of truth, the fountain of knowledge, the mistress and
      dispenser of all science. Let its ministers declare this great truth:&mdash;<i>that,
      hitherto, the mystery of Christ has alone been taught in the Church,
      without the revelation of that mystery; that the Church has been the
      depository of that sacred mystery, until the fulness of time, in which it
      is promised, that all people shall be prepared to partake of the
      revelation; that the mystery has been kept up in outward form and without
      any spiritual grace; that the spiritual grace and all the pro-mises are to
      be fulfilled in the understanding of the revelation; that the spirit or
      revelation has been buried in a resting on the letter of the Sacred
      Scriptures; that Christ is only now risen or beginning to rise, after
      thousands of years, we may say three thousand years, rather than three
      days of crucifixion, death and burial</i>. In me, he has risen indeed, as,
      in me, he has been last crucified; and I crave the pleasure of seeing his
      principles rise in the Church; for that craving is the nature of Christ.
      Let the Church declare <i>that the time is now come to reveal the mystery
      of Christ</i>. Exhibition has not been revelation.
    </p>
    <p>
      What, then, is the revelation of the mystery of Christ?
    </p>
    <p>
      It is, that Christ is God and not man, that it is God in man; that it is
      knowledge, reason, or all its essences in moral principle; and that it is
      not an idol to be worshipped as a statue, but a principle to be taught and
      inherited by the human race. The mystery sets forth Christ as a statue or
      image to be worshipped after the fashion of the Pagan world. The
      revelation teaches, that it is the principle of knowledge, to be gained by
      labour, by asking, seeking and knocking, or prayer; by repentance, that
      is, reflection; by enquiry, that is, proving all things, and holding fast
      that which is good; by mutual instruction, by free discussion, by whatever
      constitutes a school for useful knowledge, and that constitution is a
      Church of Christ: all the rest is mistake or imposture, whether it be
      established by law, or ignorantly dissented from; whether it have a King
      for its head, or be carried on in a garret or a cellar.
    </p>
    <p>
      I must go to the root of my subject, and leave no excuse for evasion. The
      root of religion is the relation of God to man, and man to God.
    </p>
    <p>
      What does man know of God?
    </p>
    <p>
      Books can teach him nothing, unless those books be written pictures of
      existing things and things that have existed. Things that have existed
      have no source of trial or test, but in the similarity of things that do
      exist.
    </p>
    <p>
      Man's knowledge of existence is of a twofold nature: the things that do
      exist, and the power by which he has that knowledge. The first is
      distinguished as material existence; the second, as spiritual existence.
      Material and spiritual existence are the only two positive existences of
      which man can speak or write, to which no inspiration can add; for
      inspiration is only knowledge; and the recognition of material and
      spiritual existence is the limitation of knowledge. The details of
      knowledge can be nothing more than definitions and descriptions of
      existing things,&mdash;the plantings of art upon nature.
    </p>
    <p>
      All knowledge is matter of art. Nature is the thing known&mdash;art the
      knowledge of the thing. This art can not only know nature, but can invent
      descriptions of unreal things; can describe things by types, and
      principles by figurative allegories; can imitate nature by appearances,
      such as pictures, statues, &amp;c.; and can, by mysterious constructions
      of language, make the appearance of a thing to represent a principle or
      describe qualities in the absence of the thing: this is spiritual power.
      Nothing of the kind is seen beyond human life; certainly not beyond animal
      life. We may, therefore, reasonably speak of spiritual power or spiritual
      existence as confined to the human race&mdash;speech and language being a
      primary necessity to its existence: the art of other animals extending not
      beyond their wants.
    </p>
    <p>
      Man, then, is the creator of spirit; and, beyond man, spirit is not known.
      Man is not known to be the creature, but the creator of art; not the
      creature, but the creator of spirit, soul, mind, reason, knowledge, or
      whatever other term relates to the mental phenomena.
    </p>
    <p>
      I maintain, because it is a truth of the deepest importance to the human
      race, and without the knowledge of which nothing can work well in human
      society, that man is the creator of all spiritual existence; and in the
      sense in which God is a spirit, man is the creator of that God, and has
      been the creator of every description of existence that has been made of
      such a God.
    </p>
    <p>
      We may also correctly speak of this two-fold existence as physical and
      moral. The physical, its forms and compositions excepted, is eternal and
      immutable&mdash;the moral is evanescent, mortal, and mutable in its
      personal existence, but immutable and immortal as to principle. The root
      of God, therefore, as of man, is in physical power, which is correctly
      described as almighty, immutable and omnipresent: it is only omniscient,
      as being the fountain of knowledge&mdash;the all that can be known.
      Science is art; therefore, there can be no science in an infinite or
      eternal sense, as we can speak of the physical power of Deity; but
      science, as art, is limited to human power,&mdash;the all that is known,
      and not the all that exists to be known.
    </p>
    <p>
      This is evidence, that man has created not only all the descriptions that
      have been made of spiritual existence, but that existence itself: and so
      it is true, that man has been the inventor of a spiritual God; that
      religion and all its appurtenances have been the offspring of the art of
      man; and that man alone is capable of correcting any of its errors,&mdash;which
      is to be done in the same way by which I propose to put down the
      Dissenters&mdash;the acquisition and communication of knowledge by the
      Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      I pass by the Pagan mythology, which, in its understood personifications
      and allegories, is as beautiful a picture of physical and moral nature, as
      the Christian Religion itself; and I rest on the Christian, as, when
      understood, the only religion for human improvement that has been
      presented to the notice of the human race.
    </p>
    <p>
      As man is the inventor of the Spiritual Deity, which is peculiarly the
      Deity of the Christian Religion, so I infer, by evidence to come, that the
      Deity of the Christian Religion is no other, nothing more, than a
      personification of the mental phenomena of the human race, which was the
      work of the philosophers and scientific men of the Pagan world: and noble
      was their task&mdash;important for man was their production. Not the thing
      called the Christian Religion now in existence, which is no other than a
      religion mistaken, a corruption and Pagan superstition, the dregs and
      drivellings of the gross ignorance and superstition of the dark ages;
      something two thousand times worse than the Paganism of the Millenium
      before the so-called Christian era. But a personification after
      deifications of the mental phenomena, is a sounding, preaching, writing,
      carving or painting God, as the perfection of knowledge; Christ, as the
      perfection of reason; and the Holy Spirit of communication, as the
      perfection of all attainable moral power by the human race: making those
      perfections to be things sought, the things worshipped, the best religion,
      as it undoubtedly is, for the whole human race. It was the best plan of
      scholastic improvement, when acted upon, that human wisdom could have
      devised, and to this I would have you bring our Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      There is a two-fold way of reading the Bible, which I have before
      described, as it is described in the Second Epistle to the Corinthians,
      chap. iii. v. 6, a reading or a ministration according to the letter, and
      another according to the spirit. The Apostle or author of that Epistle
      declares himself to have been a minister of the New Testament according to
      the spirit, and complains, that the Jews, in his time, did not know how to
      read the Old Testament. I declare that the Church now existing ministers
      to nothing but the letter of the Bible, which is a ministration not to
      life, but to death; and such is the evidence of the whole era of such a
      ministration; such has been the cause of the dark ages, on which no
      dissenting sect has yet thrown a ray of light; and the reform that is now
      required throughout the Church, that established by law and all others, is
      the understanding of the Sacred Scriptures, that shall cause them to be
      taught according to the spirit, the spirit of knowledge, reason and
      constant human improvement. I now see, that none of the people called Jews
      or Christians know how to read either Old or New Testament according to
      the spirit.
    </p>
    <p>
      To read the Bible according to the letter, is to make it a piece of human
      history; to make a creation of the world, and an attempt to account for
      everything past, present and future. I proclaim this conduct to be the
      folly of ignorance, opposed by all real history of the human race, and by
      all the developments of science, in relation to the earth's existence, its
      qualities, and its relation to the general planetary system.
    </p>
    <p>
      I challenge the proof of any one apparent historical fact, in either Old
      or New Testament. I challenge the production of the existing mention of
      any one of the supposed facts about the personal or material Jesus Christ,
      within one hundred years of the time at which it is said to have happened,
      putting the disputed passages of Josephus and Tacitus out of the question.
    </p>
    <p>
      I challenge the proof of the existence of the Jews, in any country, as a
      distinct nation, before the time of Alexander the Great.
    </p>
    <p>
      No other contemporaneous history recognizes such an assumed history as
      that which I challenge.
    </p>
    <p>
      And farther, I am prepared to prove that Christianity existed among
      Romans, Greeks, Persians, Hindoos, and Celtic Druids, or the northern
      nations, before the Christian era.
    </p>
    <p>
      The present ministration of the Church entirely depends on the necessity
      of a clear historical proof of the literal contents of the Old and New
      Testaments.
    </p>
    <p>
      But a spiritual reading of that volume solves every difficulty, and
      teaches us how to extract the truth, the system of religion that is a
      necessary and sure salvation for the human race, when reduced to practice,
      and to see it as a part of the wisdom of all ancient men of all times and
      countries.
    </p>
    <p>
      It is ten years and upwards since I sent a petition to you, Sir, to be
      laid before the King, asking for a commission to examine my oppugnancy to
      the religion and administration of the existing Church. Will you now grant
      that commission? If you will not, you, while you remain in power, will
      blunder on in and through growing troubles and difficulties, until you, or
      some other person, be compelled to come to my school for information. It
      may be a galling pain, a conscience-smitten task to you to do so; but you
      have no alternative with honesty and wisdom. It is not a little of this
      cry for Church Reform, that has sprung out of my labours and sufferings.
      And here am I, though still in prison through that Church's iniquity, in
      the proud and triumphant position, clearly seeing that you can reform
      nothing in the Church that will satisfy the people without coming to my
      ground.
    </p>
    <p>
      Your pledge is so to reform the Church as to make it meet the respect and
      affection of the people. I rejoiced when I read that sentiment; for I saw
      and felt, that I alone had proposed a reform equal to that end; and mine,
      as well as others, by the glorious power of the printing press, must come
      into consideration. I assure you that the correspondence with the Bishop
      of London, which I shall append to this letter, has been sold to the
      extent of many thousands, and is in great demand. This is but an
      enlargement of my second letter to the Bishop. So that my lamp has been
      constantly trimmed for your advent as a Reformer of the Church. It is not
      what you and others call "the rabble," "the destructives," "the mob," that
      I seek. I seek you and the Bishops, all the learned men in the country, as
      in application of mind to mind, learning to learning, and wisdom to
      wisdom.
    </p>
    <p>
      I will now proceed to explain the distinction between the mystery and the
      revelation of Christ, between the letter and the spirit of the books of
      the Old and New Testament, between false and true religion, between
      superstition and idolatry on one side, and reason with growing knowledge
      in the Church on the other. I begin with the doctrine of the Holy Trinity.
    </p>
    <p>
      The Church of the dark ages has taught the doctrine professedly founded
      upon the letter of the Sacred Scriptures: of God, as consisting of three
      persons in one person, coexistent, co-equal, and co-eternal, which, in
      expression, has been abridged, under the name of Trinity, and described as
      the Holy Trinity; and, in definition or distinction, as Father, Son and
      Holy Ghost. This doctrine has always been dissented from while dissent has
      been tolerated. It is no more a physical absurdity than the doctrine of
      the resurrection of the dead, or the changing of water to wine, or the
      feeding of five thousand with five small loaves and two fishes, or any
      other narrated miracle: still it has been dissented from, and when
      dissented from, no defence could be made of it. In every other case of
      dissent, the Church could make no defence and no other apology than
      ancientness of the doctrine in the Church. Truly this has been a
      verification of the blind leading the blind, until both fell into the
      ditch together.
    </p>
    <p>
      With a doctrine of personality in Deity, including the ideas of physical
      and moral power, this of the Trinity has been declared a mystery
      incomprehensible to the human mind; and I declare that a mystery
      incomprehensible to the human mind, pressed upon human attention, as of
      importance, is an absurdity, and must be an imposture; for who has
      comprehended it so to state? This is the matter-of-fact view of the
      subject.
    </p>
    <p>
      But the subject being a declared mystery in the theological sense, there
      is a spiritual interpretation to be put upon the language of the letter;
      and that I take to be thus:&mdash;
    </p>
    <p>
      That the Trinity is not to be considered as of persons, but of principles;
      and then we shall find it a philosophical doctrine, true to nature, and
      proved by science; true to physical and to moral science.
    </p>
    <p>
      All the ideas that physical science can bring us of creation is the root
      of three in one. Whatever admits of analysis sets forth the truth and
      doctrine of the Trinity. Water, the great parent of production on this
      planet, is known to be composed of two gases&mdash;hydrogen and oxygen.
      They become water through contact and decomposition by electric action.
      Thus, in the order of a Trinity in Unity, we may describe it as of
      hydrogen, oxygen, electric contact=water. I do not mention this as any
      thing new; but it is new in application to a definition of the doctrine of
      the Trinity. Water had not been made but by the electric contact of
      hydrogen with oxygen, by the power of a Trinity in Unity. Chemistry
      teaches us, that this power of a Trinity in Unity is an all-creating
      power; and so far it is man's comprehension of the creating power or
      Deity, and not a thing or principle incomprehensible: it is a doctrine
      older than the Christian era; was a doctrine among the Pagan Philosophers,
      and is true as to principles or powers; but not true in our modern sense
      of persons, as identical and separate beings.
    </p>
    <p>
      A great mistake, too, has been made in the understanding of the word <i>person</i>,
      in relation to theology: it never was meant to express beings in the image
      of you and me; but the dramatic manner of presenting a description of the
      principles of nature in the theatre, <i>per sonantem</i>, by sound or
      song, by fiction, by disguise, by allegory, by mask or mystery, by
      representative action: the revelation of which would be to understand the
      principles of nature so personated on the stage, as I have defined the
      Trinity. And it is in this, and no other sense, that I read the names of
      Deity in the Old or New Testament, as brought apparently on the stage of
      human affairs, in person, by the authors; that <i>personating</i> meaning
      nothing more than a present picture or representation of an absent or
      infinite power, by sounds or voice, and sometimes by masks, as was the
      earliest known practice in dramatic exhibition, which explains everything
      about gods and oracles, and makes the Hymns of Orpheus as sacred as the
      Psalms of David; as they are as certainly beautiful in poetic composition,
      and equally useful to human welfare.
    </p>
    <p>
      You, Sir, if you enter the House of Commons next month, may be said to
      personate the Electors of Tamworth; a power in the abstract greater than
      you, because many and supposed qualified to reject your personation and to
      elect another. Therefore, the personation is not the power personated. As
      the King's chief Minister, you will also personate the King's Government
      in the House of Commons; but you are not in reality that governing power;
      because, it is something distinct from you, and greater than can be
      concentrated in your person. You, as plain Robert Peel, and I, as Richard
      Carlile, are not persons; and though it is a custom so to use the word and
      so to describe us, yet it is a mistake and misuse of the word, unless the
      body may be said to personate the mind, soul, &amp;c. I hope you see that
      much of the error of our Church has turned upon this point; because a
      person was never the reality of the power, and consequently the persons of
      the Trinity are not to be considered the reality of the Trinity: and hence
      the Unitarian Dissenter has no reasonable ground of dissent. The doctrine
      of the Trinity, as a description of Deity, is a valid theological and
      philosophical doctrine, admitting of no rational dissent.
    </p>
    <p>
      I wish the Bishops to learn this before the Dissenters, so that the Church
      may be taught how to call back her errant and ignorant children, that her
      property may be held together for useful purposes, and not be wasted at
      the shrine of dissenting ignorance or bankrupt government.
    </p>
    <p>
      And now, Sir, can you yet see your way with me, "to remove every abuse
      that can impair the efficiency of the establishment; extend the sphere of
      its usefulness, and strengthen and confirm its just claims upon the
      respect and affections of the people?" If you cannot, I beg you to follow
      me farther.
    </p>
    <p>
      It is not only in physics that the doctrine of the Trinity is
      theologically and scientifically correct, but in morals also; and this is
      the foundation of the Christian Religion.
    </p>
    <p>
      As God, the Father, personates all science, under the attribute of
      omniscience; that is, personates all existence, both omnipotence and
      omnipresence, and is, in that reality, the fountain of knowledge&mdash;the
      all and every part that can be known; so God the Son, Christ or Logos,
      personates the human mind, as the existence or manifestation of knowledge
      and reason, as Jesus or the principle of salvation from evil, in
      possessing that knowledge, and as the true God, in us and with us, in and
      with whom we live, and move, and have our being.
    </p>
    <p>
      So God the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of Truth, the Comforter to come, to
      complete the happiness of the human race, personates that spirit of free
      communication of knowledge which should be found in the Church, the
      theatre, not of any superstition or dramatic ceremony, but of the freedom
      of the human mind, and all its emanations of free enquiry, free
      discussion, mutual instruction, which are the necessary elements of
      brotherly love and peace, in the proving of all things and holding fast
      that which is good. And thus I prove the truth of the doctrine of the
      Trinity.
    </p>
    <p>
      This, Sir, is a true picture or effigies of the moral Trinity of the
      Christian Church, which you will find to be a key to every mysterious
      sentence of the Bible; and I ask you seriously, as between man and man, is
      any thing of this kind known or practised in the present Church? Are not
      the ministers of that Church afraid of every new discovery in science?
      Have they not, as far as they could, persecuted every man who has
      attempted to publish any criticism, enquiry, or objection to their
      mysterious subjects? History says&mdash;Yes. And I say that they have
      known nothing of the subject for themselves, and that they have dreaded
      all knowledge of, all enquiry into, the subject. Will their pride let them
      learn of me? Well may I say:&mdash;"Come unto me, all that labour and are
      heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of
      me: for I am meek and lowly of heart: and ye shall find rest unto your
      souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light." That is the language
      of the personated Logos, or Principle of Reason, addressed to the present
      state of British mind, as it was formerly addressed to the general state
      of the human mind.
    </p>
    <p>
      The doctrine of the transubstantiation of bread and wine, as the elements
      of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, into the real body and blood of
      Christ, has been another stumbling-block in the Church. On this head, our
      law-established Church has dissented from its former self, which when I
      mentioned on my last jury trial, the Judge, Sir Allan Park, called it a
      vilifying of the Church. I knew better; but saw that the Judge was not a
      man to be reasoned with, and so I did not press the subject: but through
      this letter and your name, Sir, I desire to teach him how it has been
      done. Transubstantiation is no stumbling-block to my mind.
    </p>
    <p>
      The twenty-eighth article of the Church says on this subject:&mdash;"Transubstantiation
      (or the change of the substance of bread and wine) in the Supper of the
      Lord, cannot be proved by Holy Writ; but is repugnant to the plain words
      of Scripture, overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament, and hath given
      occasion to many superstitions. The body of Christ is given, taken, and
      eaten in the Supper, only after an heavenly and spiritual manner; and the
      mean whereby the body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper, is
      Faith."
    </p>
    <p>
      It is very clear to me that the Bishops of that time, the sixteenth
      century, did not know how to read Holy Writ. I could defend the entire
      doctrine of transubstantiation, in its fullest application, from the
      language of the Gospel according to Saint John. This subject affords me
      another proof, that the doctrine of transubstantiation is much older than
      any of the books of the New Testament: for, where understood, there is
      nothing in theology more dear than this doctrine, or that comes nearer to
      a physical and moral truth.
    </p>
    <p>
      First, let us understand that the root of the word <i>Sacrament</i> is a
      secret in the mind; and <i>Transubstantiation</i> is a change of substance
      from one to another thing. Now the secret in the mind is, where
      understood, and where not understood there is no Sacrament, that, like the
      Trinity, all the appearances of God are in the principle of
      transubstantiation or change from one to another thing. All is motion.&mdash;Nature
      knows no rest. All is change, all is transubstantiation. It is like the
      Trinity,&mdash;one of the attributes of Deity, one not to be doubted,&mdash;because
      everywhere visible. The present Church of England calls it a damnable
      doctrine; but it is so called through ignorance. Like that of the Trinity,
      it is a doctrine much older than the Christian era; and so also was that
      of the Lord's Supper, as a practised ceremony.
    </p>
    <p>
      When the name of Christ was set up to personate all the attributes of
      Deity, the various names of the Pagan gods were decried. It had become a
      matter of wisdom thus to set up the name of Christ as a personation of all
      the gods and goddesses: it was a concentration of philosophy, to unite
      mankind in one form of religion and for one great purpose, that of
      progressive and perpetual improvement. The plan was good; but the
      principle has never been rightly developed. Teaching by mystery is a bad
      system. The mass of the people are not so to be taught. We must begin and
      teach by revelation. The Christian Religion, when revealed, will be
      eternal, and realise all its real promises of peace on earth, good-will
      among men, and a land flowing with milk and honey.
    </p>
    <p>
      Before the name of Christ was used, Bacchus was called a Saviour, as were
      many other if not all the gods, as Jehovah is declared the only Saviour in
      the Old Testament. And this Bacchus had the name of Jesus, or Saviour,
      inscribed on his altar pieces, in the very letters now inscribed in our
      Churches, the three Greek letters Iota, Eta, Sigma, I.H.S., not Jesus
      Hominum Salvator, in initials, though so in meaning; but Yes, which is the
      same as Jesus, and signifies Saviour. Isis is of the same root, one of
      whose names was Ceres. Ceres personated corn or bread, and Bacchus
      personated wine. It was a Pagan custom, in religious ceremonies, to break
      and eat bread in honour of Ceres, and to pour and drink wine in honour of
      Bacchus, as the bread and wine or body and blood of salvation, of both
      physical and moral salvation.
    </p>
    <p>
      Christ being made all, both physical and moral Saviour, was intended to
      swallow up all the various Pagan honours and ceremonies, every one of
      which, in part or whole, is still retained in our law-established Church;
      and so Christ personated both the elements, bread and wine, as his body
      and blood, as before they had been called body of Ceres and blood of
      Bacchus.
    </p>
    <p>
      Be it remembered, that the Pagans had no other ideas of these matters,
      than those of dramatic effect. The origin of the drama was in and with the
      religion of the human race. And we must come back or come up to this for a
      right understanding and use of the Christian Religion.
    </p>
    <p>
      As food, bread and wine are the best elemental representatives of the body
      and blood of the human being, and will sustain human life in health and
      vigour. As bread and wine, they are elements of the physical nature of
      God; and when taken into the human body, they transubstantiate in that
      body, and, in making blood, become the blood which is necessary to sustain
      the moral god or reason in the godly man: so, through the
      transubstantiation, they do not cease to be the body and blood of Christ.
      This is what is meant in the matter, and this solves the language of Saint
      Augustine, cited in the twenty-ninth article, that though the wicked eat
      the consecrated bread and drink the wine, they do not eat the real body
      and blood of Christ, because in leading bad lives they do not improve
      themselves, and so eat and drink but for new condemnation.
    </p>
    <p>
      The revelation of the mysterious word sin, in the Sacred Scriptures, is
      generally applicable to the ignorance of the human race; and so of
      original sin, which is not to be otherwise reasonably understood. Man is
      born without knowledge, but may, by due care, be made a member of the
      Church of Christ; that is, may be made a scholar, as the foundation of a
      wise and good man.
    </p>
    <p>
      I shrink not from a full and reasonable explanation of every part of the
      mysterious doctrine of the Christian Church, in this way; and I am
      prepared to maintain, before all men, that this is the true revelation of
      the mystery, the true spirit of the letter, both of the Old and New
      Testament: "the truth as it is in Jesus"&mdash;in nature: the truth, by
      God.
    </p>
    <p>
      This beautiful and deeply-woven allegory embraces, in its mystery, almost
      every known process of nature; and must, in my opinion, have been the
      labour of the united science of many generations of the wisest men&mdash;-of
      truly inspired men. This very doctrine of transubstantiation in the
      Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, is descriptive, and is in fact and
      principle, the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ in. man. The
      bread and wine are swallowed, are buried in the human stomach, there
      decomposed or transubstantiated, formed into chyle, rise again into blood,
      and form the spirit of the man: which is, in reality, a death of the body
      and resurrection of the spirit: and the brain being the chief of the
      sentient principle, there becomes an ascension into that kingdom of
      heaven, which it is in a reasonable man, and than; which there can be, by
      law of nature, no other. The same or similar explanation applies to the
      first and second birth; the birth of the physical body in its original
      sin, the second the birth of the spiritual mind or inward man, which is
      the Lord Christ Jesus. It is a divine riddle, and such is the solution.
    </p>
    <p>
      The riddle is of larger comprehension than the mere relations of God to
      man. It is an astronomical almanack, a written and dramatized picture of
      the celestial globe; and is, in truth, a most perfect allegory of all
      known nature, both in physics and morals, in matter and spirit. There are
      no such men in the Church now as the writers of the Sacred Scriptures;
      none even with sufficient knowledge to understand them. We have fallen;
      yes, we have fallen into the dark ages; and the revelation, when known, is
      to be the millennium. We have fallen by that Scarlet Whore, the Babylon of
      Mystery; and have to rise again, by getting a knowledge of Christ, which
      is not now in the Church, nor yet among any of the Dissenters so called.
      Nothing can be imagined more anti-Christian in spirit and character, than
      that which has been called the Christian Church of the last fifteen
      hundred years.
    </p>
    <p>
      Christ, in his physical character, personates the sun and solar year,
      while his twelve disciples personate the twelve months, or the signs of
      the zodiac; and; in this sense, we have a death, descent, resurrection and
      ascension, once a year. It is in that sense he performs the miracle of
      turning the water of the pot of Aquarius (January or Winter) into the wine
      of Autumn; the story, of course, is told, in the gospel, after the form of
      a personated narrative of a dramatic incident. So the product of the
      corn-seed of five small loaves and two fishes, becomes sufficient, in the
      season, to feed five thousand. The knowledge and ingenuity of the state of
      mind, that could so construct the allegory, as an harmonious picture of
      the works of nature, is absolutely wonderful, and has my admiration, even
      my ejaculatory adoration; and I am not a little proud of my own ingenuity,
      in having penetrated thus far into so deep and mysterious a subject. It
      has brought me perfect peace of mind, as to the general system of nature,
      and left me burning with the desire to acquire more knowledge.
    </p>
    <p>
      In the Church now existing, is there aught but mystery that can be called
      its religion? And in mystery unexplained, unrevealed, can there be aught
      but impudent knavery in the ministration, with general hypocrisy or
      credulous folly in the reception? I have penetrated the subject so deeply
      as not to shrink from saying, that the present ministration of the Church
      is an impudent and mischievous imposture, sanctioned by the custom of
      antiquity, that neither instructs nor moralizes the people; for,
      notwithstanding all the pretences to religion, greater immorality than is
      here found cannot be supposed to exist among a people holding or held
      together as a community, in daily danger of disruption, and utterly
      without a code of moral guidance or guides: and this not so much among the
      poor as among the rich. Even this city is in danger, from its ill-assorted
      and ill-conditioned population, of all the disasters that befell Babylon,
      Jerusalem, Rome, Constantinople or Paris. And almost every village in the
      Island groans under want, and courts even the desolation of contested
      revolution for a change. And that very feeling and profession, which is
      now miscalled the religion of peace, will, from its state of ignorant
      dissension, only serve to whet the appetite for contention and slaughter,
      and make another war in the name of God.
    </p>
    <p>
      I call upon you to repent, by which I mean reflection. I ask you to be
      honest, and that, too, because the season of profitable dishonesty is
      exhausted, and you have wealth enough: save it. It is never too late to
      reform and do justly; but the later the reform is deferred, the more
      necessity that the justice be rigid and prompt. I feel that if I had your
      authority, I could save the Church and its property, not for a farther
      career of its iniquity and error, but as a noble institution for the good
      of the people, a sufficient school for all, and a hospital for the infirm;
      to which, I add, that this, or nothing good, must have been the purpose of
      its first institution. I believe, from what I now see of the foundation of
      the Christian Religion, that this was the first purpose of its
      institution. Banish the superstition of the Church, plant the tree of
      knowledge there, and you will quickly overthrow the morally pestilent
      Dissenters. I mean, of course, by moral means, by the exhibition of more
      knowledge and wisdom and utility than they. This would be salvation and
      reform to every good institution in the country; for when knowledge
      becomes the nation's religion and moral pole-star, everything good is
      safe, everything evil will vanish before a discussion of its merits. This
      or blood-thirsty contention is your choice. You may delay for a while; but
      you cannot otherwise reform. You, by delay, will merely bid the people
      wait until they are strong enough to combat your authority. Delay will be
      a challenge to them of physical combat.
    </p>
    <p>
      What can confer more dignity on the "Dignitaries of the Church" than for
      the Legislature to say to them:&mdash;"Feed the people with knowledge and
      no longer fill them with superstition?" If I understand human nature
      rightly, it has more pleasure in honesty than in dishonesty.
    </p>
    <p>
      Would the experimental lectures of a Faraday, desecrate the building? Or a
      beautifully reflected picture of the heavens and its explanation lessen
      true devotion? Would moral; science profane the pulpit or injure the
      congregation? Would the real catechism; and instruction, of children in
      matters of physical and moral science be of less importance than the
      parrotlike catechism of the language of the present mystery? There would
      then be some ground for a bishop's or overseer's examination and
      confirmation; but what does confirmation now mean? All that I can remember
      of it is a learn-ing to repeat from memory a prayer and a creed, perhaps a
      few commandments, which are studied to-day, to be gone through tomorrow,
      and neglected ever after. Give the people something which they can feel
      and know to be useful, which they can reduce to practice, and they will
      emulate each other in flocking to Church at the appointed times. You will
      then have need of still more churches to receive the increasing
      population. It will be an emulative pleasure to children, a new delight to
      parents, a mutual gratification to be at school together in church.
    </p>
    <p>
      I can say from observation, comparison and experience, that among the most
      moral of the working people in the metropolis, will be found those who
      have attended scientific lectures on the Sunday, and who have thereby been
      taught, to contemn superstition. You find them not in the house of
      intoxication; but passing soberly in the evening from their homes to the
      school; and gratifiedly after the lecture from the school to their homes.
      The greatest error that toryism and superstition have fallen into has been
      to suppose that knowledge will make a people disorderly. Bacon's aphorism
      is true, that superstition is the <i>primum mobile</i> of sedition, the
      great agitator; and ignorance the great disorderer of States. Is it not so
      in Ireland? Is it not your greatest trouble in this island? The wisest act
      of the life of the late Lord Castlereagh was to propose to send <i>Paine's
      Age of Reason</i> among the Roman Catholics of Ireland. If it had been so
      thoroughly done, when he proposed it, they would have been all quiet
      enough by this time. Real knowledge is the water-cup of sobriety for a
      people: with that they will seek to rid themselves of nothing but error
      and evil that cannot be morally defended.
    </p>
    <p>
      Make the change that I propose in the business and ceremony of the Church,
      and you instantly make a Christian Religion, eminently Catholic, that will
      not only annihilate the Dissenters, but convert Jew, Mahometan and Pagan.
      It will be irresistible to all mankind. They cannot argue against science;
      but each argues against the superstition of the other. Science is the
      essence of Judaism, but the men called Jews understand it not. It is the
      foundation of their name, the ground on which they have been considered a
      chosen people, it is the only sign of God in man, the only proof of true
      religion. Science and morals are the whole duty and all needful to man;
      beyond which he can gain nothing but superstition, error and evil. Science
      and morals, then, are the only proper business of the Church. Let us have
      our National Education in the Church. Let the Church be the fountain of
      knowledge, and all be there baptized, as a true sign of mental birth and
      membership of Christ.
    </p>
    <p>
      Gather together all the property that was ever ecclesiastical; get it back
      from whoever may hold it; take it out of the hands of the priesthood or
      the ministers of the Church, tithes and all; and give it into the hands of
      its true owners, the people, each parish with its separate share, and let
      the majority of the parishioners make the best use of it they can for
      ecclesiastical, that is scholastical purposes; and with it, also, provide
      for their infirm and accidentally poor. This one act of public justice and
      public good would go far toward settling the affairs of this distracted
      and unsettled nation, and do injury to no one. Let the State Parliament be
      also the Church Convocation, which may be well done when there are no
      superstitious disputes, all will go on smoothly with due and sufficient
      authority and order, and Britain look forward to happy days. It would be
      the regeneration of the whole earth in a few years. This is what is meant
      by the promise of the knowledge of the Lord covering the earth as the
      waters fill the ocean.
    </p>
    <p>
      Somebody must publicly break through the trammels of superstition, I have
      done it as far as a private man can do it; but wo public man in England
      has yet dared to approach the subject. Be you the first. No other
      circumstance could bring you a more imperishable name and fame. Of wealth
      you have enough. I ask nothing more than that you fulfil the promise of
      your administration made to the Electors of Tamworth. If you say, that you
      did not mean what I express, I shall answer you, that you could have no
      other meaning. Were I in Parliament, I would carry the subject in spite of
      prejudice; so strong is my faith in the power of knowledge. I would move,
      in such a clear and simple way, that a man should not hold up his face to
      his fellow man after voting against me.
    </p>
    <p>
      Give us a commission, with power to enquire into this subject. I will be
      content to wait all the time that justice to all concerned may require. If
      religion be any thing more than I make it&mdash;mental cultivation from
      infancy to death, it must be the private business of every man's life and
      nothing national; like national sobriety, it must be made up of the
      sobriety of each individual, and cannot rest on social forms and
      ceremonies. Ceremonial sobriety would be but the mockery of a good
      principle. I care not how much repenting and proving we have, how much
      trial, let us but have free, full, and fair enquiry and discussion, in
      Parliament and out of Parliament. Giving a man knowledge cannot be a
      disqualification for true religion. Feeding him with science can have no
      tendency to injure his morals. Occupying his time well can be no source of
      bad habits. Spurring him on to a moral emulation in the acquisition of
      equal or more knowledge than his neighbour, will not create ill will
      toward that neighbour.
    </p>
    <p>
      The best occupation of time is a question at the very root of individual
      happiness and national prosperity: I find it everywhere sadly neglected;
      here in prison, out in church, at the theatre, in public and private
      business, in families, in pursuit of pleasure, in the army&mdash;everywhere.
      It can be scarcely said, that there is anything solid in our actions;
      frivolity prevails everywhere, and is mixed up with our most serious
      professions. I cannot look back to Pagan times without seeing that they
      were a superior people to ourselves, and that we have fallen, through the
      management of our religion and politics, from, rather than risen, above
      them: we exceed them in nothing but hard and lengthy labour for small
      wages, insufficient for the necessaries of life. We have not learnt from
      Seneca, "that he lives longest who has made the best use of his time."
    </p>
    <p>
      Be it your study to seek to give us some sound moral reforms, and sink
      party politics in the moral of public good; withdraw all licences from
      houses of intoxication and late hours; let there be no public resort, in
      Parliament or elsewhere, after ten at night; if it would be no abridgement
      of general liberty, confine shop business to limited hours, that the
      conductors and assistants may have due time for mental improvement. Some
      of the young men and women in London shops, bitterly lament the want of
      more time for rational recreation, for health and improvement. They are
      among the veriest of slaves in confinement. Let knowledge be once
      legislatively encouraged, remove all taxes from it, and then a hundred
      minor arrangements, by legislation, may be made conducive to public good,
      and a bar be set against injurious, offensive, and slavish competition. It
      is the Tory fear&mdash;and, in justice, I will add, Whig fear too&mdash;of
      knowledge that has produced all the present wrongs and evils of the
      country; for if cunning men have legislated, it has not been done for the
      public good; because there has not been sufficient public responsibility.
    </p>
    <p>
      This is all Church as well as State business that I am proposing. The
      clear distinction as to Church and State is&mdash;that the Church means
      the people, congregated for mental improvement; and the State means the
      exercise of that mental improvement in their public business: so true it
      is, that Church must precede and give character to the State.
    </p>
    <p>
      Tithes are a recognition of the original proprietorship of the whole
      people in the land; a rent paid under that consideration, appropriate-able
      to the sustenance of the poor, and the mental improvement of all.
    </p>
    <p>
      Church Property is the property of the whole people who constitute the
      Church; and not, as now, of the ministers, who profess to be, and ought to
      be, the servants of the Church. At present, the servants are set above,
      defy, and tyrannize over the masters. All public officers in Church and
      State, from the King to the Beadle, should be subject to the periodical
      election of an intelligent people: without this, there can be no just and
      dignified authority&mdash;no proper public officers,&mdash;all will be
      tyranny, corruption, and inefficiency!
    </p>
    <p>
      In thus stating my subject, I am not insensible to the state of mind and
      conflicting interests with which you have to deal: but you are in a
      dilemma, from which nothing but wisdom and honesty can relieve you; every
      false or inefficient step will weaken you; any attempt to patch the holes
      made by Time in the mystery of the Church, will be like the tinker's work
      of mending one and making two: it is rusty and rotten, and must be knocked
      to pieces and burnt up, to produce the brilliant revelation from its
      ashes! There can be no mixture of the mystery with the revelation. The
      latter is a spirit that will explode the former; and, if you be a good
      Christian, let me tell you that the advent of the revelation will be the
      fulfilment of the promise of the gospel. We have had nothing but the
      mystery, nothing but the dark ages of ignorance and superstition: the
      mystery is not Christianity; the revelation alone, which we have not had,
      is Christianity. The mystery and the revelation are as unlike each other,
      as the grossest superstition is unlike reason.
    </p>
    <p>
      What a delightful state of society do I see before me, when the watchword
      of all shall be&mdash;GET KNOWLEDGE! The Bible abounds with this
      exhortation; tells us all our disorders are lack of knowledge; and yet we
      have been through centuries, almost through millenia, studiously and
      tyrannically keeping each other blind and ignorant. This has been the
      reign of the devil, Anti-Christianity, and not Christianity. When the
      portico of each Church-build-ing shall bear the inscription of&mdash;KNOW
      THYSELF, AND ENTER HERE TO GET KNOWLEDGE, the communicant will see a
      friend in his minister, and the minister will strive to raise up wisdom in
      his communicant.
    </p>
    <p>
      Now what do we see? Studied ignorance, and suppression of knowledge with
      both: each ashamed to look in the face of the other. And wherever a man
      advances beyond the existing state of mind, and publishes his sentiments,
      he is persecuted as an outcast, and unrelentingly subjected to
      prison-discipline, since the law has ceased to make the "offence" capital.
    </p>
    <p>
      The unrevealed mystery of religion has been the curse and moral devil of
      the human race. A statesman cannot be wise and honest without setting his
      face against it, and seeking to rid of it the minds of his countrymen.
      With it, a state can have no permanent peace, nor can statesmanship be an
      honour. If you are not master of this subject, I am; if you will not press
      it upon the attention of the country, I will; and I have not a doubt, but
      that, by its superior moral power, it will enable me to succeed you in
      office. I invite you to take the task in your hands, and I will be content
      to be anything, to remain in prison, if this great reform be but put in
      motion while I live.
    </p>
    <p>
      It is simply to begin to teach the people something useful in the Church,
      to give them useful knowledge, as easy in practicability as it is for a
      ripe scholar to become a schoolmaster to uninstructed youth. We have
      teachers all prepared for the purpose in the Clergy themselves. You have
      now to deal with a suspected and not a respected clergy. Though the great
      mass of the people do not understand where the fault theologically lies,
      yet they have instinctive discernment enough to see, that the relation of
      their condition to that of the Clergy is not founded in honesty and social
      utility. As sure as I, who see through the whole subject, the people feel
      that they are not fairly dealt with by the Clergy; and thus feeling, with
      such a Clergy, there can be no social peace. The feeling will increase as
      they get knowledge on the subject, and I have thrown that knowledge into
      the market, in defiance of all the power you have possessed or can
      possess; and that knowledge you cannot withdraw from the market of human
      intellect: the whole people will get at it in time.
    </p>
    <p>
      Your boast is now that of being chief or leader of the CONSERVATIVES. This
      is not what the nation wants. It needs purgation of error, abuse and
      wrong, and a restoration of all the first principles of its Institutions.
      It is a fair question to put to you and your party, if you know the first
      principles of the Institutions of this country? You certainly have seen
      none of them in practice; for your scholarship and administration have
      been full of error and wickedness. As I told Sir Allan Park, that the
      Church had dissented from itself, so I now tell you, that every
      Institution in this country that is a thousand years old in name, has
      dissented from itself, and has, in fact, been changed diabolically&mdash;which
      means directly opposite, or from good to evil; and there never was a
      country whose cup of iniquity was more filled.
    </p>
    <p>
      Conservation means preservation, and there is nothing in the present
      Institutions of this country but public wrongs and private abuses to be
      preserved. The name of a Destructive is far more honourable, in the
      present state of the country; the only name indeed that can be honourable,
      if it be interpreted, an intended destruction of error and abuses, of
      which the country is brim-full, and the fermentation pouring over.
    </p>
    <p>
      I dislike all these names. They are all dishonestly used. They form no
      real distinction between man and man. The word Radical has always been to
      me an offensive word; the more particularly so as I have seen some very
      bad and ignorant men making a great noise under it and about it. We want
      knowledge and honesty to make it practicable, and no names by which to be
      distinguished: such names spring from ignorance and dishonesty.
    </p>
    <p>
      The origin of our ancient Institutions has its foundation laid in the
      moral of law springing from the law of morals; and the restoration would
      be easy, if existing authority would resign itself to the change, or if it
      could be overpowered and made so to do. One or the other of these changes
      is necessary, before anything can be done, and the first the wisest and to
      be preferred. I believe there was a time when they existed without a
      mixture of any kind of deception practised upon the people, and that is
      just what I desire to see restored; and which, I am sure, from the growth
      of knowledge and criticism, is the one thing needful to keep the country
      in a state of inward peace.
    </p>
    <p>
      Knowledge is the only spiritual interest of the people: it should be
      fostered, promoted and increased in the Church, so as to be equalized as
      far as possible among the mass or greater number. The ignorance of the
      people has been an excuse for many an act of hypocrisy, deception and
      tyranny: its continuance is now the fault of the Church, and of those who
      have its direction. Cunning cannot invent an assumption that any
      qualification can better serve the spiritual and temporal interests of the
      people than knowledge. Their degree of knowledge is the all that is
      spiritual or of good within them. It is an affair, too, where honest
      brokerage is scarcely probable; because no check can be kept upon it.
      What, therefore, is not to be defended as knowledge is not of God but of
      the devil. In that sense, I arraign the whole Church as now constituted,
      and challenge it to stand a trial. I fear it is now too corrupt even to be
      militant.
    </p>
    <p>
      Let us suppose you about to attempt a reconciliation with the present
      Dissenters, as to the doctrines and ceremonies of the Church. To please
      the advocates of adult baptism, you must exchange the infant for adult
      baptism, and then you will displease those who are not pleased with adult
      baptism. To please the Unitarians, you must give up the doctrine of the
      Trinity; and then you will displease all the Trinitarians. What is to be
      done to satisfy the Wesleyans or Methodists? They will have irregular
      prayers and preachings, which are contrary to the discipline of the
      Church. What is to be done with the Swedenborgians, the Muggletonians, and
      Southcotians? How can you furnish spirit and noise enough for the Unknown
      Tongues of the Irvingites? And what but the spirit of silence will
      conciliate the Quakers? All of them will require the abolition of your
      bishopricks and other offices, while none of them will object, and all
      will claim if a chance offer, to divide the Church Property among them.
      The spirit of dissent, in matters of religion, prevailing in this country,
      is nothing more than an infectious mental disease: with it, there is no
      reason mixed. The moment it becomes a profit to lead such a congregation,
      men of comparative talent as to capability will take it up and lead; and
      thus the thing has gone on to confusion and mental distraction, because
      the Church was not in a condition to defend itself and set a better
      example. You cannot please one sect of the Dissenters, without increasing
      the displeasure of the other: and thus your task is hopeless, on any other
      ground than that which I propose, to beat them in the superior
      communication of knowledge.
    </p>
    <p>
      On the other hand, let us suppose the Church of England to begin to reveal
      the mystery of Jesus Christ, which I define, and maintain, to consist of a
      cultivation of the human mind, with all possible knowledge and reason; all
      other Churches must instantly bow to its superiority. The effect among men
      throughout the earth would be wonderful and intellectually electric. It is
      the only system that can be imagined to be a Catholic Christianity, and
      the very thing that is meant by the word Catholic, something alike suited
      to the welfare of every man, and which presents the principle of a moral
      equality, which is the only foundation for true liberty, and the only
      guarantee for an improvement of public morals; one that would make the
      Church an attraction to the wisest as well as to the most ignorant of men;
      those as teachers, these as learners.
    </p>
    <p>
      We may carry the idea farther; and as in the present state of mind,
      millions in Europe and America are attached to an idea of the superiority
      of the Church authorities at Rome, through ignorance and custom I grant,
      but not less attached,&mdash;I would, to humour that conceit and turn it
      to good, consent to make the Pope of Rome the centre of communication from
      all parts of the earth for discovered knowledge, as it would be desirable
      to have such a central recipient and fountain to give it forth again in
      the best possible manner. This would accelerate the reconciliation of the
      dissenting race, without an idea of dishonourable submission on the part
      of an individual. Indeed, the perfection of my proposition is, that no man
      can feel injury or degradation in the change. It is an overthrow of
      nothing, but simply the development and better understanding of the
      mystery that has existed since the world of human intellect began: the
      revelation of that mystery; and, consequently, the completion or carrying
      out of the true Christian scheme.
    </p>
    <p>
      It is not to be expected, that, in a pamphlet letter, I can do more than
      briefly notice a few leading points of this important subject; but I am
      quite prepared to extend it through volumes, and shall go on so to do. I
      am quite prepared to meet or be one of any commission on the subject. I
      would willingly put my life upon the hazard of verifying my present views
      of original Christianity. It would have been done in former ages, had the
      printing press existed. Its doing now is consequent on the gradual power
      of criticism which the Press has brought with it into existence. It is the
      truth, and must prevail. It is the God in man. It is the Church of Christ,
      against which the gates of Hell shall not prevail. They have certainly
      prevailed against every other existing Church, and the whole of the past
      is a wreck.
    </p>
    <p>
      When speaking of the original Christian Religion, or of the revelation of
      the mystery, I wish to be understood, as not meaning that the revelation
      was ever before preached or openly taught to the human race on any part of
      the earth. We have no evidence of it beyond the reasoning and moral
      precepts of the philosophical world, which were not put forth as a scheme
      or system of religion. But when it is confessedly the fact, that something
      called a Christian scheme has been talked about for eighteen hundred
      years; and when we can trace the fac simile of that something, even in its
      whole nomenclature, principle and practice, through Greeks and Romans,
      Persians and Hindoos, up to the Celtic Druids and earliest known universal
      worship of Budha, the first personation of Jesus Christ now on record;&mdash;I
      mean, that the mystery has been the only general public part of it, and
      that the knowledge of the revelation was confined to the learned class and
      ancient mysteries of all countries, was the esoteric doctrine of the
      initiated into those mysteries; and the breaking up of those mysteries,
      from the time of Alexander to the Augustan era, was the cause of the first
      publication in writing of the books or traditions handed down through the
      agency of those secret and sacred Associations, bearing the mystery only
      on its surface and by the letter; and that after the mystery was so
      published, the very ministers of it lost the revelation, which is what the
      Freemasons profess to be in search of, the lost word, the word that I have
      found and now declare, that the salvation by Jesus Christ is only to be
      found in the increasing cultivation of the human mind with all attainable
      knowledge; that the true worship of God has no other meaning, the root of
      the word worship being to cultivate, and the field to be cultivated the
      human mind; that repentance is reflection for improvement; the second
      birth is the birth of mind, as distinguished from physical birth or birth
      of body, the one describing the man Adam, the other the God Christ; and
      that the kingdom of Heaven is to be established upon a general knowledge
      and practice of this revelation, is to be upon this earth, in successive
      generations of the human race, and not reasonably to be sought under any
      other speculation, calculation or hope. These are not only possibilities
      but probabilities, and immediate practicabilities, if the existing Devil
      will be pleased to retire: if not, we must resist him, and, as we are
      promised, on that condition, he will flee.
    </p>
    <p>
      Such is the foundation of a Catholic Church, from which there can be no
      dissent; for what is understood cannot be dissented from: the existing
      dissent is ignorance dissenting from ignorance. In the common use of the
      word, I am not a Dissenter; but a trier, prover, teacher, revealer of that
      which is the true meaning of the mystery that has been through ignorance
      the cause of the dissent. The personation of Deity in the written mystery
      has been nothing more than a drama prepared for stage effect, which, to
      the initiated only, would be matter of instruction or refreshment of
      memory. The ancient mystery meant a play, a drama, in our modern sense;
      but was first called a mystery, then a morality; was first private, and
      afterwards made common to the public, and is now for the first time
      revealed to the general understanding, through the instrumentality of the
      printing press.
    </p>
    <p>
      In my lecturings and discussions, both in town and country, I find this
      revelation has a great charm among all classes who have good temper and
      good manners to hear patiently. It is pure reason, pure knowledge, pure
      translation of language; it clashes with no other man's knowledge, and I
      have not found the man who can raise an argument against it. Of its final
      and complete success in regenerating the world, I have not a doubt; it is
      only a question of time. It is now a question, if you and the Parliament
      will look at it. I know you well enough to know, that you will not like
      its propounder; but who else has been ripe and bold enough to do it? Who
      else deserves the honour of being its propounder; but I, its honest martyr
      and zealous student, through a ten years' imprisonment? I call you to
      witness my fidelity in this matter. I was your prisoner through four
      years; you sanctioned the two years I had suffered before you came to the
      Home Department: you sanctioned my imprisonment by Lord Melbourne, through
      thirty-two months: and, by virtue of your office, you are sanctioning my
      present imprisonment. I do not say this in anger. I am retaliating upon
      you, as I would have you retaliate upon the Dissenters, by superior
      knowledge. If you do not now or early take me by the hand, I shall drive
      you out of the field of politics, and all who may succeed of your
      disposition.
    </p>
    <p>
      It is not to be denied, that there are moral exhortations put forth in
      every Church; the mystery would not pass on the people without them. But
      it is a truth, that, in all of them, morals are treated as a secondary
      consideration; and in some of the madder dissenting Churches, are counted
      as of no weight in the question of religion. The truth, as it is in Jesus,
      is, that morals are every thing as to practice, and knowledge with
      succeeding reason, the principles of speculation, the WORD to be sought,
      or the prize to be gained, the crown of glory, the spiritual and immortal
      life, which is emphatically the language of Saint John's Gospel; and this
      is the totality of the root and principle of the Christian Religion, the
      promotion of which is the only proper business of the ministration in the
      Church. No mystery: down with mystery. It is the folly of the human race,
      and worse than ignorance, or knowing, or confessing to know, nothing.
      There is no Christ in the mystery. "How can we reason, but from what we
      know?" The knowledge must be first. Nothing precedes knowledge but the
      thing to be known. Nothing is required after; but a dealing with the thing
      known by principle of reason. Unknown worlds, unknown spirits, unknown
      matter, is nothing to us, until the knowledge is obtained. Our knowledge
      is our all, in moral power, and we can have nothing of a religious nature
      but our knowledge. Superstitious fears, we know to be the property or
      sensation of ignorance and misconception. We are morally responsible for
      nothing but an improper use of our knowledge. It is wickedness to teach
      ignorance any other doctrine.
    </p>
    <p>
      My Christian proposition for the Reform of the Church harmonizes with all
      science, and clashes with nothing but positive error and wicked policy;
      and I venture to tell you, that you can find no other scheme to produce
      the same effect, and to give satisfaction to the present and to all future
      generations of men, to make the Church "meet the respect and affections of
      the people."
    </p>
    <p>
      Each paltry sect now considers its tenets as a Catholic Faith; but the
      truth is, as Dr. Oeddes well observed, "that what is Christian is
      Catholic, and what is Catholic must be Christian;" but then, this follows,
      that neither Christianity nor Catholicity will bear a union with the word
      dissent, unless the dissenter be an intelligent corrector at the same
      time: they are adverse to every admissible idea of undiscussed dissent.
      All standing dissent is of the devil; while Christianity and Catholicity
      are of God and Heaven. The multiplication table, the elements of Euclid,
      the doctrines of the Trinity and Transubstantiation, the proved analysis
      and composition of all known substances, are Catholic doctrines, from
      which nothing but ignorance can dissent. The whole of the present Church
      Ritual is a mass of words that conceal a truth; but that truth is not
      known in the Church, cannot therefore be used or worshipped, and the words
      can only be deemed the lumber of the memory: treating man as man treats a
      parrot, teaching him constantly to exclaim "pretty Poll," without giving
      him understanding whom or what "Poll" personates.
    </p>
    <p>
      If I were to sit in Church through a morning or evening service, I should
      have a perfect understanding of all the words used, and, consequently,
      should be worshipping according to the limit of THE WORD there presented;
      because I have in me the spirit of revelation.
    </p>
    <p>
      But this is not the case with those who now attend the Church, their
      attendance is upon form, ceremony, mystery, hypocrisy, which is the real
      meaning of the whole present business of the Church: hypocrisy, or
      dramatical acting, set forth in a mystery, without a mixture or
      accompanying revelation; and like the flimsy gildings of a theatre, or the
      spangles of an actress' dress, gilded over with a little moral
      exhortation, that you may observe or not, as you please, so as you are a
      cheerful payer of all dues, rates, and oblations. The first revision
      wanted in the Church is a translation of the revelation from the dead
      language of its mystery, into language comprehensible by all. Consequent
      upon such a revision would be, that the parishioners would take the
      management of their own Church Property into their own hands, and recover
      and hold THEIR MOST SACRED RENT OF TITHE, on recovery of the knowledge
      that they are the first and inalienable proprietors of the land.
    </p>
    <p>
      My subject is so far novel as to justify a little repetition. That twice
      two is four need not be repeated; but where the human being is enveloped
      in a cloud of verbose mystery, that cloud can only be dispelled by
      continued flashes of moral lightning. So I will return to methodical
      statement.
    </p>
    <p>
      The mystery of the existing Church, in all its grades of dissent, having
      set forth and caused the belief of a temporal and local existence of the
      personated principles of Deity, as distinct and separate from ourselves,
      in imitation of the Pagan Mythology, and not as simulated beings; it is
      requisite, as matter of proof, sooth and truth, that a case of clear human
      history of the circumstances be first made out, the doing of which my
      knowledge, after trial, challenges; and if that could be done, the more
      difficult task would remain, to prove, that such beings, the authors of
      such circumstances, as could be historically proved, were super-human. If
      the first cannot be done, the clumsy mystery falls to the ground, as the
      Dagon of the day, before historical criticism: and if the first be done,
      and the second cannot bear the light of scientific and philosophical
      criticism, the mystery is still but a mummery, which belief can no longer
      prop, nor physical power farther propagate; it is thrown into the crucible
      of moral criticism, and men will not longer consent to believe that the
      same causes will demonstrate differing effects, nor that varying causes
      may be made to demonstrate the same effect.
    </p>
    <p>
      I have read in public prints of your creditable attendance at the Royal
      Institution of Albemarle Street, on the demonstrative Lectures of Mr.
      Faraday in the Science of Chemistry. When there, were you asked to believe
      anything?
    </p>
    <p>
      Was not everything demonstrated, so that the words were verified by the
      acts of the Lecturer? If Mr. Faraday had played you <i>hocus pocus</i> or
      legerdemain tricks, as a pretence of chemistry, would you have been
      satisfied? If he had told you of strange and incomprehensible things,
      which he could not demonstrate, would you have believed?&mdash;I think
      not: I give you credit for a better state of mind. Take a lesson from the
      inference, and grasp this truth, that the Royal Institution in Albemarle
      Street is the best Church in the country, and is, in reality, the nearest
      existing approach to the Catholic Church of Christ. It would be rational,
      it would be wisdom, if all were spending their Church time at such
      lectures, who are old enough to receive such instruction.
    </p>
    <p>
      I hope it will not offend you, nor be an untruth, to say, that you learnt
      something on every occasion of attending Mr. Faraday; that you, a
      Secretary of State, there found you had something to learn; and that a
      field was there opened to knowledge, which would, had it pleased you,
      before all other occupation, have wisely and usefully engaged the whole
      time of your remaining life. On the other hand, in the spirit of truth and
      charity, but of free enquiry, allow me to ask, if you could ever say the
      same, after an attendance at Church, on leaving, that you had learned
      something that was, without pretence, matter of real learning, an
      acquisition in knowledge possessed, that was not previously known in your
      school-hours and as a matter of school-business, or that might not have
      been learned from a book at home?
    </p>
    <p>
      I extend the question, in asking, whether anything that may be taught a
      boy at seven years of age, is improved on, by an attendance on the present
      state of the Church to seventy or four score years of age? If not, and I
      say&mdash;No, to what good purpose does this expensive establishment
      exist? Or, may it not be put to a better purpose? and if it may, why not?
      To talk about Church Reform, without doing something that shall tend to a
      full amount of practical and permanent good, is to insult the Nation;
      because the existing state of the Church is really a burthen and a
      grievance, and of no general utility.
    </p>
    <p>
      No Church was ever reformed by and with the consent of its Priesthood. I
      am of opinion that the Bishops and Clergy ought not to be consulted in
      this affair:&mdash;they are not the Church; but the ministers or servants
      of the people, which form, or ought to form, the Church. A Royal or
      Parliamentary Commission, with unlimited powers of enquiry, is the first
      power necessary with which to commence this subject of Reform in the
      Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      If we did not know human nature, history affords the warrant, that the
      Bishops and Clergy generally will follow the profits of the Church: those
      in the reign of the Tudors changed back and forward five times from
      Catholic to Protestant. But under this proposition of mine, what dignity
      is evident in the change! Instead of making the Bishops overseers and the
      Clergy generally actors of a drama, I purpose to put the whole structure
      of the human mind under their superintendance and guidance: not to be
      dealt with as now, but really to be educated in all attainable knowledge.
      My purpose is as practicable as that any other person can teach any kind
      of knowledge. Give the human being a better occupation of time, let the
      human mind expand where it may, and you guarantee perpetual peace and
      improvement, with dignity to every class of men, with injury to none.
    </p>
    <p>
      The change which I propose will be tantamount to a national change from
      diseased and crippled infancy to healthy adolescence. General man has not
      yet had fair play. No Nation, the history of which is known, has made a
      real effort to promote the happiness of all its members. Class has preyed
      upon class; idleness has been claimed as a privilege on one side, and
      slavery, through force, been made an inevitable duty on the other. For the
      furtherance of such a state of society, superstition has been encouraged,
      that a pompous class might be decorated to preach submission among the
      labourers to the Spirit of Tyranny and Imposture that was riding riotously
      over them. There can be no liberty and solid happiness among a
      superstitious people; and all attempts, at what is called political
      reform, that leave the people mentally rotting in superstition, will be
      abortive. I take credit for one fact&mdash;that there has been no change
      made in the political spirit of this country through any other medium than
      warfare with superstition; for the baneful and blighting spirit of that
      superstition admitted not of the thought of any other change.
    </p>
    <p>
      There is a glimpse of light latent to show that all the monastic
      institutions, the temples, the abbeys, priories, convents, nunneries, the
      mysteries, the churches, synagogues, and oratories, were originally
      instituted as schools of useful knowledge; and for what other good purpose
      could they have been instituted? The better part of the human mind is now
      making an effort to restore the purity of that state of things. Nothing
      short of this can tend to harmonize the human race in their several
      nations, with this improvement upon the past, that all, and not a class
      only, be educated. It was this education of a class only that has created
      all the mischief of superstitious society. The class educated has imposed
      untruths upon the uneducated class, until education itself to that class
      became swallowed up in imposture; and now both preacher and hearer may be
      truly said to be alike ignorant of all the great truths that are important
      to man, and necessary to social welfare. In the way in which the Bible is
      now read, after being printed, no preachers or teachers are necessary: to
      have been taught to read is sufficient. Give every man his Bible from
      Church Property, after teaching him to read, and the present Church
      business is completed: but much otherwise is my view of the subject. There
      is not a man living that has now a thorough understanding of the contents
      and meaning of the Bible. Many are working for the restoration of its lost
      science; and it is a subject worthy of a Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      It may startle a First Lord of the Treasury into new thought, to be told,
      that neither of the Books of the Bible is a piece of human history, not a
      history of beings like you, me, or any one else. I have given up all idea
      of the kind as untenable and indefensible. It may startle the Chancellor
      of the Exchequer, who is supposed to have the counting or reckoning of
      millions of money yearly, and contemplating that Giant of Despair&mdash;the
      Debt, to be told, that the Bible is fundamentally a mathematical book; and
      that he who does not so understand it, understands it not at all, or but
      in a very small degree, as to its moral bearing. The Duke of Sussex can
      give you an opinion on this head, as to the Bible being a book of
      algebraical science; though, perhaps, he would not like to say it applied
      to astronomical motion, and was a record of time so calculated through
      myriads of ages. A Bishop should understand this. It is a book of much
      more importance than has been made of it in the last thousand years in
      England. If the Bishops were required to have studied this book before
      they took office, we should find them generally as lean and as sallow as a
      lawyer who has to wade through the statutes at large, and law reports as
      large, for his sort of knowledge; a knowledge that I do not like, and will
      have none of, but what is forced upon me. No kind of knowledge is
      requisite to make a modern Bishop. The very origin of the title of a
      Bishop is that of an astronomical seer, a looker-out or overseer of the
      subordinate offices of science. There is a plenty of work, so as to allow
      of no idleness in any office of the Church, if justice be done to the
      people; and I will not grudge a thousand pounds a-year as a salary to a
      competent Bishop, or even more than that, if the Property of the Church
      will afford it. Ignorant fools they must have been, to have allowed so
      important, so honourable and dignified an office to become corrupt, and to
      fall into disrepute among the people.
    </p>
    <p>
      This algebraical reading of the Bible subdues all idea of contradiction to
      any science, geology for instance, chemistry or any other science, as well
      as of the apparent language of the book in letter to letter. For instance,
      the letter-objecting Infidels have laid great stress on Moses being set
      forth as having seen God; when the author of the Gospel according to Saint
      John says "No man hath seen God at any time." This is ignorantly set down
      as a clear contradiction. The explanation is, that <i>Moses was not a man</i>;
      and then there is no appearance of contradiction. One is mythologically,
      and the other morally, true.
    </p>
    <p>
      The Hebrew and Greek alphabets, being numerical as well as literal signs,
      which was probably the case with all other ancient languages, and these
      accumulating large numbers, by additional points, it is impossible that we
      can have a clear understanding of the meaning of their mythological sacred
      books, without a full algebraical knowledge of the language; and this
      explains how the letter killeth or stupifieth, while the spirit or
      knowledge of the entire meaning alone giveth life or understanding. The
      deepest investigators of the Hebrew Bible of this day maintain that it
      should be algebraically understood as a book of astronomical science&mdash;as
      a record of time by astronomical motion, which, physically speaking, can
      alone be the WORD OF THE WORKS OF GOD.
    </p>
    <p>
      The only true religion must be founded in man's reasonable comprehension;
      all other pretences to it are presumptions and nonsense to be condemned.
      We may as properly speak of religious horses and cows, as of men who are
      ignorant of the subject, substance and meaning, of what is religion. Saint
      Anthony's preaching to fishes is not without its simile in the practical
      part of that which has been mistakenly called the Christian Religion. That
      which is in practice, under the name of the Christian Religion, among many
      grades of Dissenters, is a disgrace to the government of the country, and
      to the name of civilized society: it grows worse and worse. Madness is
      beginning to be added to mystery; or is now produced by the mystery
      without the key of revelation. Through revelation there can be healthy
      excitement and enthusiasm; but none through mystery.
    </p>
    <p>
      Our King is not now the head of a Church, nor the King of a People: he can
      only be truly described as the head or King of Dissenters, which is an
      office much more troublesome and dangerous than honourable. To his
      Ministers, the present state of religious mind must be a prolific source
      of trouble; and has, I believe, made them persecutors, where the
      inclination of their own hearts was not coincident with the act. The
      Dissenters are now much less tolerant than the law-established Church; and
      if they are not undermined by my proposition, it will not take them many
      years to undermine that Church, or to demand a share of its property. To
      be able to see this, it is only necessary that we be acquainted with the
      workings of human nature, where not under the controul of knowledge.
    </p>
    <p>
      I am not content that the Established Church shall stand merely as one
      among Dissenting Churches; no Minister of State should be so content: the
      King is thereby dishonoured, and the State in disorder. I would have it a
      Church morally dominant and militant against all error, as it always
      should be, and as it was in the beginning. The meaning of the word
      militant has been entirely lost, in the growth of mystery and decay of
      revelation in the Church. There is a great talk now about revelation, or
      of something revealed in the Church; but there is no reality in the
      revelation. There is a mystery pregnant with revelation; but not in itself
      the revelation. It is a fountain of knowledge, but the genius of man must
      draw it out. It is good for nothing, but has caused a world of mischief,
      where read and understood as merely by the letter, as we read an ordinary
      book of history. The Church now wants the revelation or spirit. Not one of
      those existing has a particle of spirit.
    </p>
    <p>
      My proposition for a Reform will annihilate infidelity as well as dissent.
      There is no infidelity toward knowledge. It has been ignorance all
      through, on both sides, that has raised the cry of infidelity: each has
      been unequal to teaching. The Infidel has rejected that literal reading
      which the professing believer could not defend; because he did not
      understand its relation, as mystery to revelation. Both, in fact, have
      been alike Infidels. If I have been the chief of Infidels, I will atone
      for it in becoming the chief defender of revelation, and the faith, as it
      is in Christ Jesus, and not as it is in any Dissenting Church. Already the
      ignorant Infidels murmur at what they mistakenly call my apostacy, while
      no member of any existing Church holds out a hand to my welcome.
    </p>
    <p>
      As the Church goes now, it is not required that its Ministers be learned
      men: they have nothing to do for which talent is requisite&mdash;it is a
      mere school-boy's task; and even among the Dissenters, where the prayer
      and preaching is extemporaneous, it is not learning, but memory and habit,
      that are required. In the Church, as I would have it reformed, not only
      learning but talent to teach would be necessary; and the Ministers would
      rise to Bishoprics, not through family or political interest, but through
      preparation and capability to fill the office; for it would be required of
      them to be first-rate scholars and practical men in display of science,
      that sort of science, too, of which they are now so much afraid&mdash;the
      unlimited knowledge of things, rather than of languages.
    </p>
    <p>
      In what class of ages do we place the dark ages of man's history? To whose
      account are they placed? To the Pagan, Jew, Mahometan, Infidel, or whose?
      I blush for the Church when I consider it&mdash;to the account of that <i>misnomer</i>,
      the <i>Christian Church!</i> So your pretended light to lighten the
      Gentiles, made them all darker, did it? Yes, it did and does, as your
      Church has mistaken it! And none of you are yet out of the fog created by
      the mystery. Not one of you has gained light of mind sufficient to dispel
      a particle of that fog of the dark ages. You are all, as Churchmen, as
      dark as any of those who lived in the tenth, eleventh, twelfth, or any
      other century; talk about your Reformation, Printing Press, Bible
      Societies, Dissenters, or what you please! The admission which has been
      made, not by the adversary, but by the Church itself, that the dark ages
      are within its reign, is decisive of the question as between me and any
      who may oppose me. Let it not be said, that the fault was in the Roman
      Catholic Church, and that it has been removed. I deny the assumption; the
      fault is not removed, nor has any Church made the least improvement on
      that called Roman Catholic. The fault lies in the remaining unrevealed
      mystery of the Church and the Sacred Scriptures. As far as Church is in
      question, this Nation is as dark as ever it was, and such is the case
      throughout Europe. There is much thick darkness to be yet dispelled;
      before our gentility is enlightened. We are precisely in the same error as
      the Hindoos, to whom we send Missionaries; and though we talk about
      civilization, we have it not. Our general state of society would shock the
      moral feelings of an American Indian. There are, in reality, but two
      distinct states of society: the superstitious and the civilized, the dark
      and the light. Can any man reasonably say, that we have yet passed the
      superstitious state? Are we not rather in the very depth of it; the light
      of a few individuals, now and then visible, acting upon the whole like
      flashes of lightning on a dark night, are seen and spent quickly, lost or
      buried in the general darkness, though effects may be left? The liberty
      which I have won in prison, to make the printing press bear upon this
      darkness, is the first unextinguished light that has been set up and kept
      burning. I now desire to light the seven candles of the English Church
      from my lighted torch. I would not be presumptuous if I saw any other man
      putting himself forward to propose this necessary business. It is not in
      me conceit: it is a passionate desire to do good and to leave the world
      better than I found it. So many years of imprisonment (this being the
      tenth) must shorten the period of my life, so I grow the more anxious to
      do the more while I remain a bubble on the sea of matter borne. Not that I
      despair of eternal life, but I learn from the Gospel that I must provide
      it for myself.
    </p>
    <p>
      In the present state of the Church, there is no sufficient and
      satisfactory motive given for keeping holy the sabbath-day; there is no
      reason given for holding a sabbath. I state it as a necessary civil
      institution for the improvement of the human mind, since labour to live is
      the condition of life. While the honest labourer is following his social
      avocation through six days, I would have his children going through a
      course of education by the Ministers in the Church, their especial office&mdash;"suffer
      little children to come unto me, and forbid them not; for of such is the
      kingdom of Heaven"&mdash;and on the seventh, or sabbath day, I would have
      such discourses, such teaching in the Church, as should be suitable to the
      united presence of both old and young. This would be a satisfactory motive
      to keep that day holy; and such, as far as I can see, was the evident
      purpose of the Sabbath and of the Christian Church. No other use of the
      Church can be more hallowed; no purpose more sacred; no employment more
      dignified to the minister as well as to the people. When Peter, in the
      Gospel, is called upon to feed the lambs of Christ, what was meant?&mdash;to
      feed them with grass? No! to feed the infants of the Church with true and
      useful knowledge; not to do which is treason to society and breach of
      trust in the Ministers of the Church. Oh! here is a fine field open, in
      which the lambs may gambol and grow up in spiritual stature, without
      living to be led like sheep to the slaughter! Knowledge is the proper
      business of the Church, and the people's only spiritual interest; and this
      is the foundation of a Catholic Church and of a Christian Religion, that
      is to bring peace on earth and good-will among men, which have not yet
      been seen, notwithstanding the supposed promise of the mistaken mystery
      for the last seventeen hundred years, so many centuries of a sinking state
      of things, of a fall of man from the light into dark ages! Let there be
      light in the Church and the people shall be enlightened. The true Church
      is now eclipsed by the mystery, and is a dark body. The knowledge of the
      revelation will be the extinction of the mystery, the light of the Church,
      and the salvation of the people from war, pestilence and famine.
    </p>
    <p>
      That revelation, according to the gospel itself, I take to be, that, as
      knowledge is the only distinction between man and any other animal, the
      more can be accumulated for him in the Church, the more good will be done,
      and the more he will be saved from evil. Existing things can alone be the
      subject of man's knowledge, and it is of more importance to him to know
      their properties than their time or history. Now, nothing of the
      properties of existing things is taught in the Church; but through the
      medium of the mystery remaining unrevealed, unexplained, or untranslated
      in our language, every thing is falsified to man's credulous view and
      consideration, by the ministers of the Church; nature appears to him
      distorted, and he lives without certainty, and dies deceived as to the
      future. Knowledge is as infinite as existing things, and man's power of
      acquisition illimitable. It is, then, a proper labour and business, and
      moral duty, of each generation of men, to leave behind them, for their
      successors, the largest possible amount of knowledge. This is true wealth,
      and will increase the value of all other wealth: without knowledge, other
      wealth is mere animal gratification. The spirit of knowledge gives life
      and new properties to everything, as far as man's use of it be in
      question. The Church is the proper fountain of this knowledge; should be
      the public library, the parish laboratory for investigations, the school
      for infants and adults, and everything that is auxiliary to the
      acquisition and extension of knowledge. From all I can trace, I verily
      believe that such was the original purpose and construction of the
      Christian Church; and that back to this it may be easiest and best
      reformed.
    </p>
    <p>
      I am confirmed in the opinion, that putting knowledge under the form of an
      allegorical mystery, for the purpose of confining it to a class, has been
      the cause of the mistake and its declension, and of the scholar's fall
      from a former higher estate of knowledge. Decidedly do I conclude, that
      our stock of knowledge is much below the quantity possessed some two or
      three thousand years ago, when the holders of the sacred books held the
      revelation with the mystery. I am sure it may be recovered, if fairly and
      earnestly sought. I see an impulse gathering over both Europe and America
      for the recovery of that knowledge. The Church was instituted to become
      the repository of knowledge; and all would have gone on well, but for the
      ancient system of deceiving what were and are called the vulgar&mdash;of
      having a double doctrine, the exoteric and esoteric, telling the people
      one thing and understanding quite another among themselves. Such were
      deceivers and not teachers of the people; and though the revelation has
      really been lost, lost I may say, as a just punishment for the wickedness
      of so deceiving the people, the successive Clergy has been ignorantly
      deceivers and not teachers of the people. They have inherited the exoteric
      or mysterious doctrine, and have not inherited the esoteric doctrine or
      the revelation of the mystery. This they have to learn, before they can
      reform their Church, or, before any one can reform it for them.
    </p>
    <p>
      I am confident enough to say, that you have no other ground on which to
      reform the Church, than that which I am proposing. Whatever other step you
      take will only be an aggravation of the evil of which you have now to
      complain; or of which others complain. If the Bishops have one item of
      wisdom among them, they will take me by the hand, and put their houses in
      order this way: if not, you and they may dissipate the existing Church
      Property, which you say you will not do; and after, we shall begin to form
      such a-new, and recover what we can of that property. I shall not despair
      of taking an active part in this thorough Reform of the Church while life
      remains: the People can do it for themselves, if Clergy, Ministers and
      King will not consent. It is what I began to do in my house in the year
      1828, in critical and philosophical lectures and free discussion on the
      Sunday: an example which I am happy to see followed in many parts of this
      metropolis, and which will go on, if it be not cordially met, until it
      swallows up the Church and all the Churches.
    </p>
    <p>
      The true meaning of Church, is STATE OF MIND. Church is the state of mind.
      It is not made up of building and clergy; but of the people, the proper
      depositaries of mind. Property belonging to the Church is property
      belonging to the People, sacred to the preservation, strengthening, and
      increase of mind or knowledge. It has been monopolized dishonestly by the
      Clergy; and, in that sense, they have been robbers as well as deceivers of
      the people. This is the matter to be reformed, and nothing short of this
      will be reform. In Tithes, the people stand as the original proprietors of
      the land, the true inheritors of its tithes and first-fruits. Other rent
      is a minor consideration of value in labour or capital bestowed on the
      land. We must come back to this by some means or other.
    </p>
    <p>
      The office of King, as head of the Church, is a clerical office&mdash;the
      crown both of the Church and the State; and, for the sustentation of its
      true splendour and dignity, the man or woman filling the office should be
      the first scholar and most wise and virtuous being of the Nation. Whether
      this is a principle to be conveyed by hereditary descent, I do not stop to
      enquire; but the true hereditary principle of church office is talent and
      moral character; upon which, I doubt if any improvement can be made for
      purposes of state. Originally, in this island, Church and State were but
      one. The branching into two has been the result of wars and evil passions,
      to distinguish between the instructive and the destructive offices,
      hierarchy founded upon knowledge would be equal to all that society wants
      as government. State, as well as Church, signifies the People. As the
      latter relates to their minds, knowledge, or spiritual affairs, so the
      former expresses their politics and civil arrangements, their local and
      temporal affairs: they may be well united in one common interest, and
      under one common authority, in the reign of a people devoted to the
      acquisition of knowledge.
    </p>
    <p>
      It is matter of curious observation to see how the use of names among
      political parties is abused, and how they get reversed in applicable
      meaning. The class that has lately taken the title of Conservatives, is
      the class that, by the showing of this letter, has been destructive of
      everything valuable in our Institutions, so that we have the name only
      left, without any virtuous principle that formerly existed in those
      Institutions. We have the evidence of this in all the present difficulties
      of the country, both in Church and State. The ancestors of this class have
      not known how, or not cared to preserve those ancient Institutions in
      their original purity; and the class now wanted is the class of
      Restoratives, of men whose knowledge, wisdom, honesty and virtue, will
      enable them to purge out the accumulated errors of centuries, and restore
      the Institutions of the country to their pristine purity. I grant that
      this class is not found among the men who are commonly called or claim to
      be called Radical Reformers: there is as much ignorance in that class as
      in any other. But they certainly are not likely to be more destructive
      than they who call themselves Conservatives; for these have left nothing
      to be destroyed. The true and real aim of the men now called Radicals is
      to begin something a-new. Their profession of respect for existing
      Institutions is hollow, hypocritical and deceitful. I have had
      acquaintance enough with them to know that; and more than for the
      reminiscence of which I can now find respect. Still they will supersede
      both Tory and Whig, if these do not something upon the principle of a true
      restoration of Institutions to original and best principles. I would have
      the Radicals treated as the Dissenters: leave them no ground of complaint,
      and so annihilate them. A wise King or a wise Minister would see that the
      time is now come at which that step should be taken, and that further
      delays will be dangerous to every man in office. Necessary Institutions,
      if destroyed for a time, will rise again. I fear no kind of change as to
      the prospect of future advantage.
    </p>
    <p>
      Is not the idea horrible, and of the worst description, that a Church and
      King, or Church and State, should exist and hold together on no better
      tenure than a military power; than that of an army constantly under arms
      to keep the people from carrying their complaints to an extent
      disagreeable or alarming to the men in office? Yet such is all that you
      can boast of in the present state of the Institutions of the country.
      These Institutions did not originate under the protection of an army; nor
      did they, at their origination, require an army to protect and keep them
      in existence. An army is a disgraceful appendage, and destructive of every
      good principle in the Church:&mdash;it is not an honourable appendage to
      the office of King. To the people, it is a burthen and an immoral pest;
      less requisite in this island than in a continental nation. Give the
      people knowledge in their Churches, and they will soon dispense with an
      army.
    </p>
    <p>
      Evils accumulate because there is error at the bottom. There is now no
      People's Church: it is, as now existing, a Church of the Clergy,
      engrossing and wasting a large property of the people's due to a most
      valuable social purpose. The Dissenters have only made the matter worse,
      in new exactions for no new benefits. Not one tittle of good, not a
      particle of utility, now proceeds from the Clergy toward the people. They
      are obstacles to the people's welfare, and their use of means of provision
      for a new and better Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      God is the subject of man's adoration. But what is God? Man is but an
      idiot if he professes adoration beyond his understanding. Indeed, worship
      is but a synonymy of reason and its cultivation; and as we say:&mdash;<i>how
      can we reason but from what we know?</i> so we may as truly say:&mdash;<i>how
      can we worship what we do not know?</i> There is no worship without
      knowledge; all other pretence to it is idolatry and superstition. I have
      not space to enter upon this topic largely here; but a voluminous treatise
      on the word GOD will be the subject of my next Essay. For the purpose of
      this illustration of what the Church is, and what it ought to be, I can
      say correctly, that God, as the aggregate of existence, is known to be a
      physical and moral power. We have distinct ideas of this two-fold power.
      The American Indians, who speak of God as a Great Spirit, make the best
      general definition of the word that can be made, and appear to me to have
      the clearest, purest and wisest idea of Deity, as far as the regulation of
      their actions by that word is in question,&mdash;the pursuit of knowledge,
      by the use of letters and figures excepted. It corresponds with the
      emphatic declaration of the Gospel according to Saint John, chap. iv., v.
      24:&mdash;"God is a Spirit, and they that worship must worship in spirit
      and in truth"&mdash;which means what I have before stated, that they must
      know what they worship before they can worship. There is evidence of
      physical as well as moral spirit. Both are seen in man, and constitute
      what may be termed the Spirit of Man. The one in man is worshipped or
      cultivated by attention to health; the other by attention to mental
      improvement or increased acquisition of knowledge. Speaking of God, as the
      aggregate and source of physical and moral spirit, of which man is a part
      or unit, we experience that we cannot alter our physical construction, or
      physical spirit, other than by attention to rules of health in the law of
      nature; but we can, by study and labour, greatly alter the state of mind
      or moral spirit. It is here we draw from God as from a fountain; and this
      asking, seeking, drawing from God, constitutes the whole principle of
      right prayer and worship, and the structure of the true Christian Church;
      other than which, I declare, is worship of the Devil and not of God. And I
      do not shrink from saying, that, as revelation is light and knowledge of
      God, and mystery is darkness and presence of the Devil, there has not
      through the last fifteen hundred years, the dark ages, throughout Europe,
      been carried on any other kind of worship than Devil-worship, and evil has
      been the fruit thereof. It was under this knowledge that I was moved to
      exhibit the effigy of the Devil arm in arm with the Bishop, in the front
      of my house and in several prints, for which I am now suffering
      imprisonment, like all other martyrs to truth, punished for acting upon my
      knowledge. My purpose was good, to open the eyes of my neighbours and
      passers by. It might have inconvenienced some of them; but such is the
      effect of every newly-published truth in eradication of error: your Reform
      of the Church, be it what it may, will inconvenience the Bishops and some
      of the Clergy. There would be no Devil, if there were not pleasure in Hell
      as well as in Heaven; as pardon can be had by asking for it. If all evil
      were naturally punished, we should not want penal laws.
    </p>
    <p>
      As true worship is a getting of a knowledge of God, so it follows, that
      the Ministry of the Church should consist of a teaching that knowledge,
      which is not now the case; for nothing as knowledge is in the Church
      taught.
    </p>
    <p>
      There can be nothing more clear in mathematical demonstration, than that,
      as God is a Spirit, of which man may partake, the participation must
      increase with that only which can increase in man&mdash;the amount of his
      knowledge. The whole declaration of the Christian Creed, read by the
      spirit, is, that God is the Spirit of Knowledge, the thing known, the
      principle of omniscience; and that man approaches and lives with God, as
      his mind expands in the accumulation of knowledge. A Bishop may write or
      preach spiritually or metaphysically by the year, and he can make no more
      of the word God, of his Church, or of himself, than I have made. The
      subject now wants a radical reform in the human mind.
    </p>
    <p>
      I have mentioned, in a former page, that the Jews can trace no nationality
      to the time of the Emperor Alexander of Macedon. The highest antiquity
      that can be given to them as a colony, is the time of Ptolomy Lagus, who
      began to encourage science and literature in Alexandria; and, from that
      time, nothing but a colony could they have ever been. It is not in a
      nationality that the original character of a Jew is to be estimated, but
      in a philosophic character dispersed among the nations; a people devoted
      to science; and so a chosen or select, because a learned people. There is
      no resemblance in character between an ancient and a modern Jew:&mdash;the
      name is an Asiatic name of God; and can only apply to a race of men in the
      sense of having perfected human nature, which it is very probable the
      ancient Jews had done, as far as it was then possible to do it, according
      to the system of initiation, through a series of discipline, into all the
      schools and mysteries of that time and country. The first public reference
      to a stated existence of the Books of the Old Testament is the reign of
      Ptolomy Philadelphus. Egypt appears to have been the only country in which
      it can be said that a series of Kings gave encouragement to science, which
      appears, as far as history is witness, to have brought in the Augustan
      era. It became, as far as wars and tumults would permit, fashionable so to
      do, until superstition overwhelmed it and usurped all its names, leading
      on to the dark ages of what has been since mis-called the Christian era.
      Cultivation of science is the restorative power, and the only public or
      private act that confers true dignity on man. This is the only remedy for
      the disorder of the Church; and I have introduced this historical view of
      the Jewish name, to show how flimsy is that web of superstition which has
      been woven in the existing Church on the foundation of a supposed national
      history and origin of the Jews. Truth nowhere finds opposition in fact,
      date, or principle: error is opposed by endless proofs of the kind.
    </p>
    <p>
      It remains now only that I give an outline of the historical defects of
      the present received view of the mystery of the Christian Religion, and
      then draw to a conclusion.
    </p>
    <p>
      No record extant, or referred to, that, having been written in the first
      century, has mentioned the human existence of an individual of the name of
      Jesus Christ.
    </p>
    <p>
      A passage now in Josephus is a declared interpolation, inasmuch as it was
      first known to the world in the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius,
      written in the fourth century, after Photius and Origen, of the third
      century, had written, that Josephus had not made mention of Jesus Christ.
    </p>
    <p>
      In the writings of Philo Judæus, an Alexandrian Jew of the first century,
      much is said about the Logos, in carrying out the philosophy of Plato; but
      not a word about Jesus Christ.
    </p>
    <p>
      Pliny the younger, in his letter to the Emperor Trajan, written from
      Bythinia between the years 106 and 112, is the first to mention the name
      of Christ. This mention is as of a God and not as of a man: no reference
      is made to Judea or to Jews; and the worshippers of this God he describes
      under the name of Christians, and as having long existed as a sect in that
      province. He writes as if he had heard nothing of the sect at Rome, and
      describes their worship as an excessive superstition.
    </p>
    <p>
      The passage in Tacitus is rejected, as not noticed by Eusebius or any one
      before the fifteenth century; that it was found in a copy by Johannes de
      Spire at Venice.
    </p>
    <p>
      This brings us to Justin Martyr, who can only be considered a Christian of
      the Platonic order, making no reference to Gospels or Epistles.
    </p>
    <p>
      Thence we come to St. Irenæus, Bishop of Lyons, who has very much the
      appearance of a Druidical Bishop rather than as a newly-appointed
      Christian Bishop. Irenæus mentions the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke
      and John, and gives the reason why there should be four; as because there
      are four seasons in the year. He has many other allegorical extravagancies
      in his writings, and is not deemed the most respectable of the Fathers of
      the present Church.
    </p>
    <p>
      In the third century, and toward the latter part of that century, near
      three hundred years after the supposed birth of the man Jesus Christ, we
      have a recognition of all the Books in the New Testament, which received
      the stamp of the authority of a Council of Bishops, as a selection from
      many similar and dissimilar books under similar titles, in the fourth
      century; but whether the revelation of the mystery was then understood by
      the Bishops does not appear.
    </p>
    <p>
      The Epistles of the New Testament have no dates nor reference to any
      persons who were known to have lived at any particular time. They are not
      supported by, nor do they support, the Gospels. The idea of allegorism
      prevailed in the third century.
    </p>
    <p>
      The Christian era was not reduced to chronology until the sixth century;
      and that chronology was very little used or referred to until the tenth,
      that the era of the Hegira of Mahomet had come much into use. The real
      struggle of the present Christian Church was not with the Pagan but with
      the Mahometan Religion, and they are near a balance of numerical power to
      this day. A battle in France, in the reign of Charles Martel, checked the
      progress of the Mahometans, and saved the entire overthrow of the
      mysterious Christian Church on the continent of Europe. There was a much
      greater similarity between the Pagan and the Christian, than between the
      Christian and the Mahometan Religion.
    </p>
    <p>
      I have no objection to the religion of the Jew or the Christian, that is
      founded on the spiritual reading of the Bible. Mahometanism is superior to
      both, while founded on the reading of the letter. The restoration of the
      Jews to original character and the millennium of the Christians is only to
      be brought about by the spiritual reading, which will lead to a devotion
      to science. The future Temple of the New Jerusalem must be a Temple
      devoted to the promulgation of truth and all sciences, and such must be
      the Church of Rome, and such our English Church, under any real state of
      reformation.
    </p>
    <p>
      The practical part of my proposition for a Reform in the Church, is, that
      all indefensible superstition or mystery be banished or explained, that it
      be made the best possible general school for the people, to which the
      knowledge of the time is equal; that the people being the Church, and the
      Ministers not being the Church, the property of the Church in each parish
      shall be managed by the parishioners as their property, and the best
      provision be made with that property, including tithes, that can be made
      for all the physical and moral necessities of the people. The property
      must be put under some authority, cannot be allowed to remain as it is,
      cannot be well put under extra parochial authority; but may be well and
      honestly left to parochial management, as the property of the parish.
    </p>
    <p>
      As our Institutions were all so first arranged for this purpose, so it
      will be found, that every thing emanating will fall back easily into its
      natural, moral, and original use. I cannot see the least difficulty,
      beyond the dishonesty and reluctance to yield of existing spirit. Such as
      are so weak in mind as to desire the present Church ceremony, may have it
      as long as they like, so as they do not exclude more useful business. I
      repeat, that, if the Bishops and Clergy be wise, they will take this
      advice: if they do not, they will very soon be where their predecessors
      were in the seventeenth century, not to be restored again.
    </p>
    <p>
      I flatter myself, that, in this letter, I have produced a pamphlet that
      will not be dead-born. As far as possible, or as clearness of purpose
      would permit, I have endeavoured to avoid the use of offensive language.
      Whatever the world may think of me, I know nothing more of myself, than
      that of having a passion to be useful, to my country and fellow-men
      generally, in and previous to the critical coming time of change. It is
      not now to be mistaken as near. It is near, and very near. The present
      system may be dragged on through several years; but no one can insure it a
      twelve months' existence. I know that all bad passions are allied to
      ignorance, and I desire to see all those passions softened down by
      knowledge. I am sure that the new man, the spiritual man, the good and
      moral man, must be created by knowledge and independent individuality of
      action; and as I prefer (the Government having the choice) a moral to any
      other revolution, brought about by words rather than by harder and harsher
      weapons, I feel, that I have but performed a social, a civil, and a
      religious duty, in presenting this letter to your notice. That it may be
      read, marked, learned and inwardly digested, is the prayer of
    </p>
    <p>
      Your humble Servant,
    </p>
    <p>
      And prisoner in the business of Church Reform,
    </p>
    <p>
      RICHARD CARLILE.
    </p>
    <p>
      Giltspur Street Compter,
    </p>
    <p>
      January 29,1835.
    </p>
    <p>
      TENTH YEAR OF IMPRISONMENT.
    </p>
    <div style="height: 6em;">
      <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
    </div>
<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 40211 ***</div>
</body>
</html>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2026-06-05 21:10:02 +0000