diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:11:49 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:11:49 -0700 |
| commit | 6a67a980bc38c2df3d306d5f16cc8dd336406988 (patch) | |
| tree | 586af76ca82dc50fee47973caf5626124994f1e5 /39065-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '39065-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 39065-h/39065-h.htm | 9456 |
1 files changed, 9456 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/39065-h/39065-h.htm b/39065-h/39065-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0c1ecb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/39065-h/39065-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,9456 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<!-- $Id: header.txt 236 2009-12-07 18:57:00Z vlsimpson $ --> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Five Great Philosophies of Life, by William De Witt Hyde. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + clear: both; +} + +p { + margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; +} + +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; +} + +table { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; +} + +.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; +} /* page numbers */ + +.blockquot { + margin-left: 25%; + margin-right: 25%; +} + +.center {text-align: center;} + +.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + +/* Poetry */ + .poem {margin-left:10%; margin-right:10%; text-align: left;} + + .poem br {display: none;} + + .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;} + + .poem span.i16 {display: block; margin-left: 9em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i20 {display: block; margin-left: 12em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i6 {display: block; margin-left: 4em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Five Great Philosophies of Life, by +William de Witt Hyde + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license + + +Title: The Five Great Philosophies of Life + +Author: William de Witt Hyde + +Release Date: March 7, 2012 [EBook #39065] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FIVE GREAT PHILOSOPHIES *** + + + + +Produced by Christina Blust, Juliet Sutherland and the +Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + +</pre> + + + + + + +<h1 style="margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em">THE<br /> +FIVE GREAT PHILOSOPHIES<br /> +OF LIFE</h1> + +<h4>BY</h4> + +<h2>WILLIAM DE WITT HYDE</h2> + +<p class="center">PRESIDENT OF BOWDOIN COLLEGE</p> + + +<h4 style="margin-top: 4em">New York<br /> +THE MACMILLAN COMPANY<br /> +1924</h4> + +<p class="center"><i>All rights reserved</i></p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<h4>PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA</h4> + + +<p class="center" style="margin-top: 3em"> +<span class="smcap">Copyright, 1904,<br /> +By</span> THE MACMILLAN COMPANY.<br /> +</p> +<hr style="width: 10%;" /> + +<p class="blockquot">Set up and electrotyped. Published September, 1904. Reprinted +January, 1905; January, 1906; January, 1908; June, 1910.</p> + + + + +<p class="center"> +<span class="smcap">Copyright, 1911,<br /> +By</span> THE MACMILLAN COMPANY.<br /> +</p> +<hr style="width: 10%;" /> + +<p class="blockquot">Set up and electrotyped. Published September, 1911. Reprinted +May, 1912; May, 1913; May, 1914; July, 1915; January, November, +1917; August, 1919; February, October, 1920; June, November, +1921; September, 1922; June, 1923; September, 1924.</p> + + +<h4 style="margin-top: 3em"> +Norwood Press<br /> +J.S. Cushing Co.—Berwick & Smith Co.<br /> +Norwood, Mass., U.S.A.</h4> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[Pg v]</a></span></p> +<h2>PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION</h2> + + +<p>When asked why some men with moderate +talents and meagre technical equipment succeed, +where others with greater ability and better preparation +fail; why some women with plain features +and few accomplishments charm, while others with +all the advantages of beauty and cultivation repel, +we are wont to conceal our ignorance behind the +vague term <i>personality</i>. Undoubtedly the deeper +springs of personality are below the threshold of +consciousness, in hereditary traits and early training. +Still some of the higher elements of personality +rise above this threshold, are reducible to +philosophical principles, and amenable to rational +control.</p> + +<p>The five centuries from the birth of Socrates +to the death of Jesus produced five such principles: +the Epicurean pursuit of pleasure, genial but +ungenerous; the Stoic law of self-control, strenuous +but forbidding; the Platonic plan of subordination, +sublime but ascetic; the Aristotelian sense +of proportion, practical but uninspiring; and the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[Pg vi]</a></span> +Christian Spirit of Love, broadest and deepest of +them all.</p> + +<p>The purpose of this book is to let the masters +of these sane and wholesome principles of personality +talk to us in their own words; with just +enough of comment and interpretation to bring +us to their points of view, and make us welcome +their friendly assistance in the philosophical guidance +of life.</p> + +<p>Why a new edition under a new title? Because +"From Epicurus to Christ" had an antiquarian +flavor; while the book presents those answers to +the problem of life, which, though offered first by +the ancients, are still so broad, deep, and true that +all our modern answers are mere varieties of these +five great types. Because the former title suggested +that the historical aspect was a finality; +whereas it is here used merely as the most effective +approach to present-day solutions of the fundamental +problems of life.</p> + +<p>"Why rewrite the last chapter?" Because, +while the faith of the world has found in Jesus +much more than a philosophy of life, in its quest +for greater things it has almost overlooked that. +Yet Jesus' Spirit of Love is the final philosophy +of life.</p> + +<p>To the question in its Jewish form, "What is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</a></span> +the great commandment?" Jesus answers, "The +first is Love to God; and the second, just like it, +Love to man." Translated into modern, ethical +terms his philosophy of life is a grateful and helpful +appreciation; first of the whole system of +relations, physical, mental, social, and spiritual, as +Personal like ourselves, but Infinite, seeking perfection, +caring for each lowliest member as an +essential and precious part of the whole; and, +second, of other finite and imperfect persons, whose +aims, interests, and affections are just as real, and +therefore to be held just as sacred, as our own.</p> + +<p>To love, to dwell in this grateful and helpful +appreciation of the Father and our brothers,—this +is life: and all that falls short of it is intellectually +the illusion of selfishness; spiritually the +death penalty of sin.</p> + +<p>From this central point of view every phase of +Jesus' teaching, his democracy, compassion, courage, +humility, earnestness, charitableness, sacrifice, +can be shown to flow straight and clear.</p> + +<p>Of course such a limitation to his philosophy +of life leaves out of account all supernatural and +eschatological considerations. We here consider +only the truth and worth of the teaching; not who +the Teacher is, nor what may happen to us hereafter +if we obey or disobey.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[Pg viii]</a></span></p> + +<p>Yet even from this limited point of view we +may get a glimpse, more real and convincing than +any to be gained by the traditional, dogmatic approach, +of the divine and eternal quality of both +Teacher and teaching—we may see that beyond +Love truth cannot go; above Love life cannot rise; +that he who loves is one with God; that out of +Love all is hell, whether here or hereafter; and +that in Love lies heaven, both now and forevermore.</p> + +<p style="text-align: right">WILLIAM DE WITT HYDE.</p> + +<p> +<span class="smcap">Bowdoin College</span>,<br /> + <span class="smcap">Brunswick, Maine</span>,<br /> + July 25, 1911.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">[Pg ix]</a></span></p> +<h2>CONTENTS</h2> + + + +<div class="center"> +<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary=""> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"></td><td align="right"><small>PAGE</small></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"><big> +<a href="#CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I</a></big></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"><big><span class="smcap">The Epicurean Pursuit of Pleasure</span></big></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">I.</td><td align="left">Selections from the Epicurean Scriptures</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">II.</td><td align="left">The Epicurean View of Work and Play</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_20">20</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">III.</td><td align="left">The Epicurean Price of Happiness</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_29">29</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">IV.</td><td align="left">The Defects of Epicureanism</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_36">36</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">V.</td><td align="left">An Example of Epicurean Character</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_46">46</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VI.</td><td align="left">The Confessions of an Epicurean Heretic</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_53">53</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"><big> +<a href="#CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II</a><br /> +<span class="smcap">Stoic Self-control by Law</span> +</big></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">I.</td><td align="left">The Psychological Law of Apperception</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_66">66</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">II.</td><td align="left">Selections from the Stoic Scriptures</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_71">71</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">III.</td><td align="left">The Stoic Reverence for Universal Law</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_82">82</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">IV.</td><td align="left">The Stoic Solution of the Problem of Evil</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_87">87</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">V.</td><td align="left">The Stoic Paradoxes</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_90">90</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VI.</td><td align="left">The Religious Aspect of Stoicism</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_95">95</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VII.</td><td align="left">The Permanent Value of Stoicism</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VIII.</td><td align="left">The Defects of Stoicism</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_106">106</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"><big> +<a href="#CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III</a><br /> +<span class="smcap">The Platonic Subordination of Lower to Higher</span> +</big></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">I.</td><td align="left">The Nature of Virtue</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_110">110</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">II.</td><td align="left">Righteousness writ Large</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_116">116</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">[Pg x]</a></span></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">III.</td><td align="left">The Cardinal Virtues</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_123">123</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">IV.</td><td align="left">Plato's Scheme of Education</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_131">131</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">V.</td><td align="left">Righteousness the Comprehensive Virtue</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_138">138</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VI.</td><td align="left">The Stages of Degeneration</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_143">143</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VII.</td><td align="left">The Intrinsic Superiority of Righteousness</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_153">153</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VIII.</td><td align="left">Truth and Error in Platonism</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_159">159</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"><big> +<a href="#CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV</a><br /> +<span class="smcap">The Aristotelian Sense of Proportion</span> +</big></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">I.</td><td align="left">Aristotle's Objections to Previous Systems</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_169">169</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">II.</td><td align="left">The Social Nature of Man</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_176">176</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">III.</td><td align="left">Right and Wrong determined by the End</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_179">179</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">IV.</td><td align="left">The Need of Instruments</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_191">191</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">V.</td><td align="left">The Happy Mean</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_194">194</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VI.</td><td align="left">The Aristotelian Virtues and their Acquisition</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_199">199</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VII.</td><td align="left">Aristotelian Friendship</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_209">209</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VIII.</td><td align="left">Criticism and Summary of Aristotle's Teaching</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_212">212</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"><big> +<a href="#CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V</a><br /> +<span class="smcap">The Christian Spirit of Love</span></big></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">I.</td><td align="left">The Teaching of Love</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_215">215</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">II.</td><td align="left">The Fulfilment of Law through Love</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_219">219</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">III.</td><td align="left">The Counterfeits of Love</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_239">239</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">IV.</td><td align="left">The Whole-heartedness of Love</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_247">247</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">V.</td><td align="left">The Cultivation of Love</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_257">257</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VI.</td><td align="left">The Blessedness of Love</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_264">264</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VII.</td><td align="left">The Supremacy of Love</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_277">277</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="center" colspan="3"></td></tr> +<tr><td align="left"><a href="#INDEX">INDEX</a></td><td align="right"></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_293">293</a></td></tr> +</table></div> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<h1 style="margin-top: 3em; margin-bottom: 3em">THE FIVE GREAT PHILOSOPHIES<br /> +OF LIFE</h1> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</a></span></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I"></a>CHAPTER I</h2> + +<h3>THE EPICUREAN PURSUIT OF PLEASURE</h3> + + +<h4>I<br /> +SELECTIONS FROM THE EPICUREAN SCRIPTURES</h4> + +<p>Epicureanism is so simple a philosophy of life +that it scarcely needs interpretation. In fact, as +the following citations show, it was originally little +more than a set of directions for living "the simple +life," with pleasure as the simplifying principle. +The more subtle teaching of the other philosophies +will require to be introduced by explanatory statement, +or else accompanied by a running commentary +as it proceeds. The best way to understand +Epicureanism, however, is to let Epicurus and his +disciples speak for themselves. Accordingly, as +in religious services the sermon is preceded by +reading of the Scriptures and singing of hymns, +we will open our study of the Epicurean philosophy +of life by selections from their scriptures +and hymns. First the master, though unfortu<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</a></span>nately +he is not so good a master of style as +many of his disciples, shall speak. The gist of +Epicurus's teaching is contained in the following +passages.</p> + +<p>"The end of all our actions is to be free from +pain and fear; and when once we have attained +this, all the tempest of the soul is laid, seeing that +the living creature has not to go to find something +that is wanting, or to seek something else by +which the good of the soul and of the body will be +fulfilled." "Wherefore we call pleasure the alpha +and omega of a blessed life. Pleasure is our first +and kindred good. From it is the commencement +of every choice and every aversion, and to it we +come back, and make feeling the rule by which to +judge of every good thing." "When we say, then, +that pleasure is the end and aim, we do not mean +the pleasures of the prodigal, or the pleasures of +sensuality, as we are understood by some who are +either ignorant and prejudiced for other views, or +inclined to misinterpret our statements. By pleasure +we mean the absence of pain in the body and +trouble in the soul. It is not an unbroken succession +of drinking feasts and of revelry, not the +enjoyments of the fish and other delicacies of a +splendid table, which produce a pleasant life: it +is sober reasoning, searching out the reasons for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</a></span> +every choice and avoidance, and banishing those +beliefs through which great tumults take possession +of the soul." "Nothing is so productive of +cheerfulness as to abstain from meddling, and not +to engage in difficult undertakings, nor force yourself +to do something beyond your power. For all +this involves your nature in tumults." "The main +part of happiness is the disposition which is under +our own control. Service in the field is hard +work, and others hold command. Public speaking +abounds in heart-throbs and in anxiety whether +you can carry conviction. Why then pursue an +object like this, which is at the disposal of others?" +"Wealth beyond the requirements of nature is no +more benefit to men than water to a vessel which +is full. Both alike overflow. We can look upon +another's goods without perturbation and can enjoy +purer pleasure than they, for we are free from their +arduous struggle."</p> + +<p>"Thou must also keep in mind that of desires +some are natural, and some are groundless; and +that of the natural some are necessary as well as +natural, and some are natural only. And of the +necessary desires, some are necessary if we are +to be happy, and some if the body is to remain +unperturbed, and some if we are even to live. By +the clear and certain understanding of these things<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span> +we learn to make every preference and aversion, +so that the body may have health and the soul +tranquillity, seeing that this is the sum and end of +a blessed life." "Cheerful poverty is an honourable +thing." "Great wealth is but poverty when +matched with the law of nature." "If any one +thinks his own not to be most ample, he may become +lord of the whole world, and will yet be +wretched." "Fortune but slightly crosses the +wise man's path." "If thou wilt make a man +happy, add not unto his riches, but take away +from his desires."</p> + +<p>"And since pleasure is our first and native good, +for that reason we do not choose every pleasure +whatsoever, but oftentimes pass over many pleasures +when a greater annoyance ensues from them. +And oftentimes we consider pains superior to +pleasures, and submit to the pain for a long time, +when it is attended for us with a greater pleasure. +All pleasure, therefore, because of its kinship with +our nature, is a good, but it is not in all cases our +choice, even as every pain is an evil, though pain +is not always, and in every case, to be shunned."</p> + +<p>"It is, however, by measuring one against another, +and by looking at the conveniences and +inconveniences, that all these things must be +judged. Sometimes we treat the good as an evil,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span> +and the evil, on the contrary, as a good; and we +regard independence of outward goods as a great +good, not so as in all cases to use little, but so as +to be contented with little, if we have not much, +being thoroughly persuaded that they have the +sweetest enjoyment of luxury who stand least in +need of it, and that whatever is natural is easily +procured, and only the vain and worthless hard to +win. Plain fare gives as much pleasure as a costly +diet, when once the pain due to want is removed; +and bread and water confer the highest pleasure +when they are brought to hungry lips. To habituate +self, therefore, to plain and inexpensive diet +gives all that is needed for health, and enables a +man to meet the necessary requirements of life +without shrinking, and it places us in a better +frame when we approach at intervals a costly fare, +and renders us fearless of fortune."</p> + +<p>"Riches according to nature are of limited +extent, and can be easily procured; but the wealth +craved after by vain fancies knows neither end nor +limit. He who has understood the limits of life +knows how easy it is to get all that takes away the +pain of want, and all that is required to make our +life perfect at every point. In this way he has no +need of anything which involves a contest." "The +beginning and the greatest good is prudence.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</a></span> +Wherefore prudence is a more precious thing +even than philosophy: from it grow all the other +virtues, for it teaches that we cannot lead a life of +pleasure which is not also a life of prudence, honour, +and justice; nor lead a life of prudence, honour, +and justice, which is not also a life of pleasure. +For the virtues have grown into one with a pleasant +life, and a pleasant life is inseparable from +them."</p> + +<p>"Of all the things which wisdom procures for +the happiness of life as a whole, by far the greatest +is the acquisition of friendship."</p> + +<p>"We ought to look round for people to eat and +drink with, before we look for something to eat +and drink: to feed without a friend is the life of a +lion and a wolf." "Do everything as if Epicurus +had his eye upon you. Retire into yourself +chiefly at that time when you are compelled to be +in a crowd." "We ought to select some good +man and keep him ever before our eyes, so that we +may, as it were, live under his eye, and do everything +in his sight." "No one loves another except +for his own interest." "Among the other ills +which attend folly is this: it is always beginning +to live." "A foolish life is restless and disagreeable: +it is wholly engrossed with the future." +"We are born once: twice we cannot be born,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span> +and for everlasting we must be non-existent. But +thou, who art not master of the morrow, puttest +off the right time. Procrastination is the ruin of +life for all; and, therefore, each of us is hurried +and unprepared at death." "Learn betimes to +die, or if it please thee better to pass over to the +gods." "He who is least in need of the morrow +will meet the morrow most pleasantly." "Injustice +is not in itself a bad thing: but only in the +fear, arising from anxiety on the part of the wrong-doer, +that he will not escape punishment." "A +wise man will not enter political life unless something +extraordinary should occur." "The free +man will take his free laugh over those who are +fain to be reckoned in the list with Lycurgus and +Solon."</p> + +<p>"The first duty of salvation is to preserve our +vigour and to guard against the defiling of our life +in consequence of maddening desires." "Accustom +thyself in the belief that death is nothing to us, +for good and evil are only where they are felt, and +death is the absence of all feeling: therefore a right +understanding that death is nothing to us makes enjoyable +the mortality of life, not by adding to years +an illimitable time, but by taking away the yearning +after immortality. For in life there can be +nothing to fear, to him who has thoroughly appre<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</a></span>hended +that there is nothing to cause fear in what +time we are not alive. Foolish, therefore, is the +man who says that he fears death, not because it +will pain when it comes, but because it pains in +the prospect. Whatsoever causes no annoyance +when it is present causes only a groundless pain +by the expectation thereof. Death, therefore, the +most awful of evils, is nothing to us, seeing that +when we are, death is not yet, and when death +comes, then we are not. It is nothing then, either +to the living or the dead, for it is not found with +the living, and the dead exist no longer."</p> + +<p>These words of the master, given with no attempt +to reconcile their apparent inconsistencies, +convey very fairly the substance of his teaching, +including both its excellences and its deep defects. +The exalted esteem in which his doctrines were +held, leading his disciples to commit them to memory +as sacred and verbally inspired; the personal +reverence for his character; and the extravagant +expectations as to what his philosophy was to do +for the world, together with a glimpse into the +Epicurean idea of heaven, are well illustrated by +the following sentences at the opening of the +third book of Lucretius, addressed to Epicurus:—</p> + +<p>"Thee, who first wast able amid such thick +darkness to raise on high so bright a beacon and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span> +shed a light on the true interests of life, thee I +follow, glory of the Greek race, and plant now +my footsteps firmly fixed in thy imprinted marks, +not so much from a desire to rival thee as that +from the love I bear thee I yearn to imitate thee. +Thou, father, art discoverer of things, thou furnishest +us with fatherly precepts, and like as bees +sip of all things in the flowery lawns, we, O glorious +being, in like manner, feed from out thy +pages upon all the golden maxims, golden I say, +most worthy ever of endless life. For soon as +thy philosophy issuing from a godlike intellect +has begun with loud voice to proclaim the nature +of things, the terrors of the mind are dispelled, +the walls of the world part asunder, I see things +in operation throughout the whole void: the divinity +of the gods is revealed, and their tranquil +abodes which neither winds do shake, nor clouds +drench with rains nor snow congealed by sharp +frost harms with hoary fall: an ever cloudless ether +o'ercanopies them, and they laugh with light shed +largely round. Nature too supplies all their wants, +and nothing ever impairs their peace of mind."</p> + +<p>Horace is so saturated with Epicureanism that +it is hard to select any one of his odes as more +expressive of it than another. His ode on the +"Philosophy of Life" perhaps presents it in as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span> +short compass as any. He asks what he shall +pray for? Not crops, and ivory, and gold gained +by laborious and risky enterprise; but healthy, +solid contentment with the simple, universal pleasures +near at hand.</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Why to Apollo's shrine repair<br /></span> +<span class="i0">New hallowed? Why present with prayer<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Libation? Not those crops to gain,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Which fill Sardinia's teeming plain,<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Herds from Calabria's sunny fields,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Nor ivory that India yields,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Nor gold, nor tracts where Liris glides<br /></span> +<span class="i0">So noiseless down its drowsy sides.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Blest owners of Calenian vines,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Crop them; ye merchants, drain the wines,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">That cargoes brought from Syria buy,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">In cups of gold. For ye, who try<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"The broad Atlantic thrice a year<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And never drown, must sure be dear<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To gods in heaven. Me—small my need—<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Light mallows, olives, chiccory, feed.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Give me then health, Apollo; give<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Sound mind; on gotten goods to live<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Contented; and let song engage<br /></span> +<span class="i0">An honoured, not a base, old age."<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>For a lesson from the new Epicurean testament +we cannot do better than turn to the sensible +pages of Herbert Spencer's "Data of Ethics."</p> + +<p>"The pursuit of individual happiness within those<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span> +limits prescribed by social conditions is the first +requisite to the attainment of the greatest general +happiness. To see this it needs but to contrast +one whose self-regard has maintained bodily well-being +with one whose regardlessness of self has +brought its natural results; and then to ask what +must be the contrast between two societies formed +of two such kinds of individuals.</p> + +<p>"Bounding out of bed after an unbroken sleep, +singing or whistling as he dresses, coming down +with beaming face ready to laugh on the smallest +provocation, the healthy man of high powers, +conscious of past successes and, by his energy, +quickness, resource, made confident of the future, +enters on the day's business not with repugnance +but with gladness; and from hour to hour experiencing +satisfactions from work effectually done, +comes home with an abundant surplus of energy +remaining for hours of relaxation. Far otherwise +is it with one who is enfeebled by great neglect of +self. Already deficient, his energies are made +more deficient by constant endeavours to execute +tasks that prove beyond his strength, and by the +resulting discouragement. Hours of leisure which, +rightly passed, bring pleasures that raise the tide +of life and renew the powers of work, cannot be +utilized: there is not vigour enough for enjoy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span>ments +involving action, and lack of spirits prevents +passive enjoyments from being entered upon +with zest. In brief, life becomes a burden. Now +if, as must be admitted, in a community composed +of individuals like the first the happiness will be +relatively great, while in one composed of individuals +like the last there will be relatively little +happiness, or rather much misery; it must be admitted +that conduct causing the one result is good +and conduct causing the other is bad.</p> + +<p>"He who carries self-regard far enough to keep +himself in good health and high spirits, in the first +place thereby becomes an immediate source of +happiness to those around, and in the second +place maintains the ability to increase their happiness +by altruistic actions. But one whose bodily +vigour and mental health are undermined by self-sacrifice +carried too far, in the first place becomes +to those around a cause of depression, and in the +second place renders himself incapable, or less +capable, of actively furthering their welfare.</p> + +<p>"Full of vivacity, the one is ever welcome. For +his wife he has smiles and jocose speeches; for +his children stores of fun and play; for his +friends pleasant talk interspersed with the sallies +of wit that come from buoyancy. Contrariwise, +the other is shunned. The irritability resulting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span> +now from ailments, now from failures caused by +feebleness, his family has daily to bear. Lacking +adequate energy for joining in them, he has at +best but a tepid interest in the amusements of his +children; and he is called a wet blanket by his +friends. Little account as our ethical reasonings +take note of it, yet is the fact obvious that since +happiness and misery are infectious, such regard +for self as conduces to health and high spirits is a +benefaction to others, and such disregard of self +as brings on suffering, bodily or mental, is a malefaction +to others.</p> + +<p>"The adequately egoistic individual retains those +powers which make altruistic activities possible. +The individual who is inadequately egoistic loses +more or less of his ability to be altruistic. The +truth of the one proposition is self-evident; and +the truth of the other is daily forced on us by +examples. Note a few of them. Here is a +mother who, brought up in the insane fashion +usual among the cultivated, has a physique not +strong enough for suckling her infant, but who, +knowing that its natural food is the best, and +anxious for its welfare, continues to give milk for +a longer time than her system will bear. Eventually +the accumulating reaction tells. There +comes exhaustion running, it may be, into illness<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span> +caused by depletion; occasionally ending in death, +and often entailing chronic weakness. She becomes, +perhaps for a time, perhaps permanently, +incapable of carrying on household affairs; her +other children suffer from the loss of maternal +attention; and where the income is small, payments +for nurse and doctor tell injuriously on the +whole family. Instance, again, what not unfrequently +happens with the father. Similarly +prompted by a high sense of obligation, and +misled by current moral theories into the notion +that self-denial may rightly be carried to any +extent, he daily continues his office work for long +hours regardless of hot head and cold feet; and +debars himself from social pleasures, for which he +thinks he can afford neither time nor money. +What comes of this entirely unegoistic course? +Eventually a sudden collapse, sleeplessness, inability +to work. That rest which he would not give +himself when his sensations prompted he has now +to take in long measure. The extra earnings laid +by for the benefit of his family are quickly swept +away by costly journeys in aid of recovery and by +the many expenses which illness entails. Instead +of increased ability to do his duty by his offspring +there comes now inability. Lifelong evils on +them replace hoped-for goods. And so is it, too,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</a></span> +with the social effects of inadequate egoism. All +grades furnish examples of the mischiefs, positive +and negative, inflicted on society by excessive +neglect of self. Now the case is that of a +labourer who, conscientiously continuing his work +under a broiling sun, spite of violent protests from +his feelings, dies of sunstroke; and leaves his +family a burden to the parish. Now the case +is that of a clerk whose eyes permanently fail +from overstraining, or who, daily writing for hours +after his fingers are painfully cramped, is attacked +with 'scrivener's palsy,' and, unable to write at +all, sinks with aged parents into poverty which +friends are called on to mitigate.</p> + +<p>"And now the case is that of a man devoted to public ends who, +shattering his health by ceaseless application, fails +to achieve all he might have achieved by a more +reasonable apportionment of his time between +labour on behalf of others, and ministration to his +own needs."</p> + +<p>After this lengthy prose extract, let us turn to +the modern Epicurean poets.</p> + +<p>At once the best and the worst rendering of +Epicureanism into verse is Fitzgerald's translation +of Omar Khayyam. It is the best because of the +frankness with which it draws out to its logical +conclusion, in a cynical despair of everything<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</a></span> +nobler than the pleasure of the moment, the consequences +of identifying the self with mere pleasure-seeking. +It is the worst because, instead of +presenting Epicureanism mixed with nobler elements, +as Walt Whitman and Stevenson do, it +gives us the pure and undiluted article as a final +gospel of life. The fact that it has proved such a +fad during the past few years is striking evidence +of the husky fare on which our modern prodigals +can be content to feed.</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Come fill the Cup, and in the fire of Spring<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Your Winter-garment of repentance fling:<br /></span> +<span class="i0">The bird of Time has but a little way<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To flutter—and the Bird is on the Wing.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"A Book of Verses underneath the Bough,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of Bread—and Thou<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Beside me singing in the Wilderness—<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Oh, Wilderness were Paradise enow.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Ah, my Beloved, fill the Cup that clears<br /></span> +<span class="i0"><i>To-day</i> of past Regrets and future Fears:<br /></span> +<span class="i0"><i>To-morrow!</i>—Why, To-morrow I may be<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Myself with Yesterday's Sev'n thousand Years.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"I sent my soul through the Invisible,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Some letter of that After-life to spell:<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And by and by my Soul return'd to me,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And answer'd, "I myself am Heav'n and Hell:<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Heav'n but the vision of fulfill'd Desire,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And Hell the Shadow of a Soul on Fire,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Cast on the Darkness into which Ourselves,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">So late emerged from, shall so soon expire."<br /></span> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span></div></div> + +<p>From this melancholy attempt to offer us Epicureanism +as a complete account of life, overshadowed +as it is by the gloom of the Infinite +which the man who stakes his all on momentary +pleasure feels doomed to forego, it is a relief to +turn to men who strike cheerfully and firmly the +Epicurean note; but pass instantly on to blend it +with sterner notes and larger views of life, in +which it plays its essential, yet strictly subordinate +part.</p> + +<p>Of all the men who thus strike scattered Epicurean +notes, without attempting the impossible task +of making a harmonious and satisfactory tune out +of them, our American Pagan, Walt Whitman, is +the best example.</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"What is commonest, cheapest, nearest, easiest, is Me,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Me going in for my chances, spending for vast returns,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Adorning myself to bestow myself on the first that will take me,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Not asking the sky to come down to my good will,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Scattering it freely forever.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"O the joy of manly self-hood!<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To be servile to none, to defer to none, not to any tyrant known or unknown,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To walk with erect carriage, a step springy and elastic,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To look with calm gaze or with flashing eye,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To speak with a full and sonorous voice out of a broad chest,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To confront with your personality all the other personalities of the earth.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span><br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"O while I live to be the ruler of life, not a slave,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To meet life as a powerful conqueror,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">No fumes, no ennui, no more complaints or scornful criticisms,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To these proud laws of the air, the water, and the ground, proving my interior soul impregnable,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And nothing exterior shall ever take command of me.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"For not life's joys alone I sing, repeating—the joy of death!<br /></span> +<span class="i0">The beautiful touch of death, soothing and benumbing a few moments, for reasons,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Myself discharging my excrementitious body to be burn'd, or render'd to powder, or buried,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">My real body doubtless left to me for other spheres,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">My voided body nothing more to me, returning to the purifications, further offices, eternal uses of the earth.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"O to have life henceforth a poem of new joys!<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To dance, clap hands, exult, shout, skip, leap, roll on, float on!<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To be a sailor of the world bound for all ports,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">A swift and swelling ship full of rich words, full of joys."<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>Whitman, with this wild ecstasy, to be sure is +an Epicurean and something more. Indeed, pure +Epicureanism, unmixed with better elements, is +rather hard to find in modern literature. One +other hymn, by Robert Louis Stevenson, likewise +adds to pure Epicureanism a note of strenuous +intensity in the great task of happiness which was +foreign to the more easy-going form of the ancient +doctrine. In Stevenson Epicureanism is only a +flavour to more substantial viands.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span></p> + +<h5>THE CELESTIAL SURGEON</h5> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"If I have faltered more or less<br /></span> +<span class="i0">In my great task of happiness;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">If I have moved among my race<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And shown no glorious morning face;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">If beams from happy human eyes<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Have moved me not; if morning skies,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Books, and my food, and summer rain<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Knocked on my sullen heart in vain:—<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Lord, thy most pointed pleasure take<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And stab my spirit broad awake!<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Or, Lord, if too obdurate I,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Choose thou, before that spirit die,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">A piercing pain, a killing sin,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And to my dead heart run them in."<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>While we are with Stevenson, we may as well +conclude our selections from the Epicurean scriptures +in these words from his Christmas Sermon: +"Gentleness and cheerfulness, these come before +all morality: they are the perfect duties. If your +morals make you dreary, depend upon it they +are wrong. I do not say, 'give them up,' for +they may be all you have; but conceal them like +a vice, lest they should spoil the lives of better +men."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>II<br /> +THE EPICUREAN VIEW OF WORK AND PLAY</h4> + +<p>Pleasure is our great task, "the gist of life, the +end of ends." To be happy ourselves and radiating +centres of happiness to choice circles of +congenial friends,—this is the Epicurean ideal. +The world is a vast reservoir of potential pleasures. +Our problem is to scoop out for ourselves +and our friends full measure of these pleasures +as they go floating by. We did not make the +world. It made itself by a fortuitous concourse of +atoms. It would be foolish for us to try to alter +it. Our only concern is to get out of it all +the pleasure we can; without troubling ourselves +to put anything valuable back into it. Since it +is accidental, impersonal, we owe it nothing. We +simply owe ourselves as big a share of pleasure as +we can grasp and hold.</p> + +<p>This, however, is a task in which it is easy to +make mistakes. We need prudence to avoid +cheating ourselves with short-lived pleasures that +cost too much; wisdom to choose the simpler +pleasures that cost less and last longer. Such +shrewd calculation of the relative cost and worth +of different pleasures is the sum and substance of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span> +the Epicurean philosophy. He who is shrewd +to discern and prompt to snatch the most pleasure +at least cost, as it is offered on the bargain +counter of life,—he is the Epicurean sage.</p> + +<p>We might work this out into a great variety +of applications: but one or two spheres must +suffice. Eating and drinking, as the most elemental +relations of life, are the ones commonly +chosen as applications of the Epicurean principle. +These applications, however, the selections from +Epicurus and Horace have already made clear.</p> + +<p>The Epicurean will regulate his diet, not by the +immediate, trivial, short-lived pleasures of taste, +though these he will by no means despise, but +mainly by their permanent effects upon health. +Wholesome food, and enough of it, daintily prepared +and served, he will do his best to obtain. +But elaborate and ostentatious feasting he will +avoid, as involving too much expense and trouble, +and too heavy penalties of disease and discomfort. +He will find out by practical experience the quantity, +quality, and variety of simple food that keeps +him in perfect condition; and no enticements of +sweetmeats or stimulants will divert him from the +simplicity in which the most permanent pleasure +is found. To eat cake and candy between meals, +to sip tea at all hours, no less than to drink<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</a></span> +whiskey to the point of intoxication, are sins +against the simplicity of the true Epicurean +regimen.</p> + +<p>The Epicurean will not lose an hour of needed +sleep nor tolerate such an abomination as an alarm +clock in his house. If he permits himself to be +awakened in the morning, it will be as Thomas B. +Reed used to when, as a student at Bowdoin College, +he was obliged to be in chapel at six o'clock. +He had the janitor call him at half-past four, in +order that he might have the luxury of feeling that +he had another whole hour in which to sleep, and +then call him again at the last moment which would +permit him to dress in time for chapel.</p> + +<p>These things, however, we may for the most +part take for granted. We do not require a +philosopher to regulate our diet for us; or to +put us to bed at night, and tuck us in, and hear +us say our prayers. Those elementary lessons +were doubtless needed in the childhood of the +race. The selection from Spencer on work and +play strikes closer to the problem of the modern +man; and it is at this point that we all sorely +need to go to school to Epicurus. Perhaps we +are inclined to look down on Epicurus's ideal +as a low one. Well, if it is a low ideal, it is +all the more disgraceful to fall below it. And<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span> +most of us do fall below it every day of our +tense and restless lives. Let us test ourselves +by this ideal, and answer honestly the questions +it puts to us.</p> + +<p>How many of us are slaving all day and late +into the night to add artificial superfluities to +the simple necessities? How many of us know +how to stop working when it begins to encroach +upon our health; and to cut off anxiety and +worry altogether? How many of us measure +the amount and intensity of our toil by our physical +strength; doing what we can do healthfully, +cheerfully, joyously, and leaving the rest undone, +instead of straining up to the highest notch +of nervous tension during early manhood and +womanhood, only to break down when the life +forces begin to turn against us? Every man in +any position of responsibility and influence has +opportunity to do the work of twenty men. How +many of us in such circumstances choose the one +thing we can do best, and leave the other nineteen +for other people to do, or else to remain +undone? How many of us have ever seriously +stopped to think where the limit of healthful +effort and endurance lies, unless insomnia or +dyspepsia or nervous prostration have laid their +heavy hands upon us and compelled us to pause?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span> +Every breakdown from avoidable causes, every +stroke of work we do after the border-land of +exhaustion and nervous strain is crossed, is a +crime against the teaching of Epicurus; and +these diseases that beset our modern business +life are the penalties with which nature visits +us in vindication of the wisdom of his teachings. +Every day that we work beyond our strength; +every hour that we spend in consequent exhaustion +and depression; every minute that we give +over to worrying about things beyond our immediate +control, we either fall below, or else rise +above, Epicurus's level.</p> + +<p>If we rise above him, to serve higher ideals, +conscious of the sacrifice we make, and clear +about the superior ends we gain thereby, then +we may be forgiven. What some of those higher +ideals are we shall have occasion to consider +later. But to work ourselves into depression, disease, +and pain, for no better reason than to get +high mark in some rank-book or other, to gratify +somebody's false vanity, to get together a little +more gold than we can spend wisely or our +children can inherit without enervation, to live in +a bigger house than our neighbour has or we can +afford to take care of—to work for such ends +as these beyond the point where work is healthy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</a></span> +and happy, is to commit a sin which neither +Epicurus nor Nature will forgive. With the people +who have risen above Epicurus, and are deliberately +sacrificing to some extent the Epicurean +to one of the higher ideals, as I have said, we +have no quarrel; for them we have only hearty +commendation. We do not ask the mother whose +child is dangerously sick, the statesman in a political +crisis, the artist when the conception of his +great work comes over him, to heed for the time +being the limits of strength and the conditions +of completest health. All we ask of them is +that later on, when the child has recovered, when +the crisis is past, when the picture is painted, +they shall reverently and humbly pay to Epicurus, +or to Nature whom he represents, the penalty +for their sin, by a corresponding period of complete +rest and relaxation. We must bear strain +at times; and Nature will forgive us if we do +not take it too often. But we must not bunch +our strains. We must not pass from one strain +to another, and another, without periods of relaxation +between. We must not let the attitude +of strain become chronic, and develop into a moral +tetanus, which keeps us forever on the rack of +exertion from sheer restless inability to sit down +and enjoy ourselves.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span></p> + +<p>What we take from excessive work Epicurus +would bid us add to needed play. Play is an +arrangement by which we get artificially, in highly +concentrated form, the pleasure which in ordinary +life is diffused over long periods, and attainable +only in attenuated form. Play puts the great +fundamental pleasures of the race at the disposal +of the individual.</p> + +<p>Foot-ball, for instance, gives the student of +to-day the essential joy in combat of his barbarian +ancestors, with the modern field-marshal's delight +in subtle tragedy thrown in. Base-ball gives the +intense zest that comes of speed, accuracy, and +cunning exercised in emergencies. Golf, in +milder form, gives us the pleasure that comes of +accuracy of aim and calculation of conditions in +good company and in the open air. Billiards give +to the clerk cramped all day over his desk the +joy of a delicate touch which otherwise would +be the exclusive property of his artisan brother. +The various games of cards give the mechanic +and the housewife a taste at evening of the eager +interests that fill the banker's and the broker's +days. Checkers and chess give to the humblest +in their homes some touch of the pleasures of +the general and admiral. Dancing carries to the +limit of orderly expression that delight in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span> +person and presence of the opposite sex which +otherwise would have to be postponed until youth +was able to assume the more serious responsibilities +of permanent relationships. Sailing, tramping, +camping out, hunting, fishing, mountain +climbing, are all devices for bringing into the +lives of studious, strenuous, city people the elemental +pleasures which otherwise would be the +monopoly of sailors, fishermen, foresters, and +explorers. Swimming, skating, bicycle riding, +driving a horse or an automobile, all give the +keen joy that comes of the mastery of graceful +and forceful motion.</p> + +<p>The theatre, which embodies so distinctively the +peculiar essence of play that its performances +have appropriated the name, takes us in a couple +of hours through the epitomised experience of +many persons extending over many years in circumstances +far removed from our individual lives. +Poetry, novels, biographies, histories, painting, +music, and all the forms of art perform for us +this same function. They take us out of our +local and temporal situation, and let us live in +other days and other lands, in other customs and +costumes; and so enormously widen the world +of experience we imaginatively make our own. +Besides in all the forms of play and art the ends<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span> +are made artificially simple, the means are made +supernaturally accessible; so that instead of toiling +for years in doubt of results as in actual work, +we experience in play, and witness in artistic +representation, the whole process of selecting +materials and moulding them to a successful issue +in a few minutes, or a few hours at most. All +this reacts upon our power to prosecute with +confidence the remoter ends, and marshal the +more obdurate means of real work. It expands +and limbers our capacity to subordinate means to +ends and find delight in the process as well as in +the outcome. Hence a man who goes a year +without a considerable period given over to play, +or a week without at least one or two solid periods +of it, or lets many days go by without any play +whatever, is selling his birthright of personality +for a mess of pottage. Psychology and pedagogy +are recognising the important function of play in +the development of personality as never before. +Professor Baldwin, in his "Social and Ethical +Interpretations," sums up the functions of play +in these words: "In the education of the individual +for his life-work in a network of social +relationships play is a most important form of +organic exercise,—a most important method of +realisation of the social instincts; gives flexibility<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</a></span> +of mind and body with self-control; gives constant +opportunity for imitative learning and invention, +and is the experimental verification of the +benefits and pleasures of united action."</p> + + +<h4>III<br /> +THE EPICUREAN PRICE OF HAPPINESS</h4> + +<p>Whoever contracts his work and expands his +play, on Epicurean principles, will of course have +common sense enough to cut off hurry and worry +altogether. Both are sheer waste and wantonness,—the +most foolish and wicked things in the +whole list of forbidden sins. The Epicurean will +live his life in care-tight, worry-proof compartments; +working with all his might while he works; +and then cutting it off short; never letting the +cares of work intrude on the precious precincts of +well-earned leisure, or permitting the strain of +remembered or anticipated toil to mar the hours +sacred to rest and recreation. Some things are +bound to go wrong in every life. That is our +misfortune. But there is no need of brooding over +them in gratuitous grief after they have gone, or +dreading them in gloomy anticipation before they +come. If either in anticipation or in retrospect +these evils are permitted to darken the hours when<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span> +they are physically absent, that is not our misfortune; +it is our folly and our fault.</p> + +<p>We hear a great deal in these days about mind +cures, and rest cures, and faith cures, and cures by +hypnotism, and cures by patent medicines. If +anybody needs these cures, of course he is welcome +to them; though there is much to be said for the +stalwart conservative who refused proffered aid +of this sort with the remark that he would rather +die in the hands of a skilful physician than be +cured by a quack. Strict obedience to the plain, +homely doctrine of Epicurus would prevent ninety-nine +one hundredths of the physical and mental +ailments which these various systems of healing +profess to cure. In almost every such case work, +or the square of work which is hurry, or the cube +of work which is worry, carried beyond the sane +limits which Epicurus prescribes, is at the root of +trouble. Where it is not work and worry, it is +their passive counterparts, grief nursed long after +its occasion has gone by, or fear harboured long +before its appropriate object has arrived. Cut +these off and all the use you will have for either +healers or physicians will be on such comparatively +rare occasions as birth, death, contagious +diseases, and unavoidable accident. You will not +be the chronic patient of any doctor regular<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span> +or irregular; or the consumer of any medicine, +patented or prescribed.</p> + +<p>Neither useless regrets for the past nor profitless +forebodings for the future should ever cast +their shadows over the present, which taken in +itself is always endurable, and may generally +be made positively happy. Memory should be +purged of all its unpleasantness before its pictures +are permitted to appear before the footlights +of reflection; and the searchlight of +expectation should always be turned toward the +pleasures that are still in store for us. Past and +future are mainly in our power, so far as the +quality of things we remember and anticipate +are concerned. And even the brief and fleeting +present is mainly filled by reminiscence and anticipation, +so that it too is largely what we please +to make it.</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"The world is so full of a number of things,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">I'm sure we should all be as happy as kings."<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>If any one of us is not happy all the time, +except at the rare instants when toothache, or +the news of a friend's illness or death, or a bad +turn in our investments takes us by surprise—if +happiness is not the dominant tone of our ordinary +life, it is simply because we do not want +it, in that thoughtful, enterprising, insistent way<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</a></span> +in which the scholar wants knowledge, or the +business man wants money, or the politician +wants votes. Whoever is willing to pay the +price in prudent planning of his daily pleasures, +in relentless exclusion of the enterprises and indulgences +that cost more pain than they can +return in pleasure; whoever will cut out remorselessly +the things in his past life on which he +cannot dwell with pleasure, and lop off the considerations +which give rise to dread; whoever is +willing to pay this Epicurean price for happiness +can have it just as soon and just as often as he +pays down the cash of a faithful and consistent +application of these principles. If any man goes +about the world in a chronic unhappiness, it is +ninety-nine per cent the fault, not of his circumstances, +but of himself. There is not a reader +of this book whose circumstances are so black +that another person, in those same circumstances, +would not find a way to be supremely and +dominantly, if not exclusively and continuously, +happy. There is not a reader of this book so +rich, so blessed with family and friends, so occupied +and diverted, but that another person in +those same circumstances would be miserable +himself, and a source of misery to everybody +with whom he came in contact. Epicurus is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</a></span> +right, that happiness is up at auction all the time, +and sold in lots to suit the purchaser whenever +he bids high enough. And the price is not +exorbitant: prudence to plan for the simple pleasures +that can be had for the asking; resolution +to cut off the pleasures that come too high; determination +to amputate our reflections the instant +they develop morbid symptoms, and to take an +anti-toxine against fret and worry, the moment +we feel the approach of their contagious atmosphere; +concentration, to live in a self-chosen +present from which profitless regret and unprofitable +anxieties, projected from the past or borrowed +from the future, are absolutely banished.</p> + +<p>It is high time to treat melancholy, depression, +gloom, fretfulness, unhappiness, not merely as +diseases, but as the inexcusable follies, the intolerable +vices, the unpardonable sins which a sane +and wholesome Epicureanism pronounces them +to be.</p> + +<p>The Epicurean principle, then, forbids us to go +whining, whimpering, and weeping through this +glorious and otherwise cheery world, making ourselves +a burden and nuisance to our friends; and +tells us frankly that if we are so much as tempted +to such melancholy living, it is because we are +too improvident, too slothful, too stupid to cast<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span> +out these devils, which a little plain fare, hard +work, outdoor exercise, vigorous play, and unworried +rest would exorcise forever. It bids us +put in place of these banished sighs and groans +and tears, the laughter, song, and shout that +"spin the great wheel of earth about." We may +sum it all up in the picture of a worthy Epicurean's +day.</p> + +<p>After a night of sleep too sound to harbour an +unpleasant dream, he greets the hour of rising +with a shout and bound, plunges into the bath, +meets with gusto the shock it gives, and rejoices +in the glow of exhilaration a vigorous rubbing +brings; greets the household "with morning +face and morning heart," eager to share with +the family the meal, the news, the outlook on +the day, resolved like Pippa to "waste no wavelet +of his twelve-hours' treasure"; then, whether work +calls him forth immediately or not, takes a few +minutes of brisk walking and deep breathing in +the open air until he feels the great forces of +earth, air, and sunshine pulsing in his veins; +then greets the work of kitchen or factory, office +or field, schoolroom or counter, bench or desk +with an inward cheer, as something to put forth +his surplus energy upon; and through the swift, +precious forenoon hours delights in the mastery<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span> +over difficulty his stored-up power imparts; takes +the noon-day meal gayly and leisurely with congenial +people; through the early afternoon hours +does the lighter portion of the day's work if he +must; gets out for an hour or two in the open +air if he may, with horse, or wheel, or automobile, +or boat, or racket, or golf clubs, or skates, +or rod, or gun, or at least a friend and two stout +walking shoes; comes to the evening meal in the +family circle widened to include a few welcome +guests, or at the home of some hospitable host, +in garments from which all trace of stain or hint +of strain has been removed, to share the best +things market and purse afford, served in such +wise as to prolong the opportunity for the interchange +of wit and banter, cursory discussion and +kindly compliment; spends the evening in quiet +reading or public entertainment, games with his +children or visiting with friends; and then returns +again to sleep with such a sense of gratitude for +the dear joys of the day as sends an echo of +"All's well" down through even the shadowy substance +of his unconscious dreams. Surely there +are some features of this Epicurean day which +we, in our bustling, restless, overelaborated lives, +might introduce with great profit to ourselves, +and great advantage to the people with whom<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span> +we are intimately thrown. A series of such days, +varied by even happier holidays and Sundays, +broken once or twice a year at least by considerable +vacations, added together, will make a life +which Epicurus says a man may live with satisfaction, +and after which he may pass away content.</p> + +<p>If there be no other life, let us by all means +make the most of this. And if, both here and +hereafter, there be a larger life than that perceivable +by sense,—as, on deeper grounds than the +Epicurean psychology recognises, most of us +believe there is,—this healthy, hearty, wholesome +determination to live intensely and exclusively in +the present is a much more sincere and effective +way to develop it than the foolish attempt of a +false other-worldliness to anticipate or discount +the future, by a half-hearted, far-away affectation +of superiority to the simple homely pleasures of +to-day.</p> + + +<h4>IV<br /> +THE DEFECTS OF EPICUREANISM</h4> + +<p>Thus far we have pointed out certain valuable +elements of truth which Epicureanism contains. +Only incidentally have we encountered certain +deep defects. Epicurus's "free laugh" at those<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span> +who attempt to fulfil their political duties, his +quiet ignoring of all interests that lie outside his +little circle, or reach beyond the grave, his naïve +remark about the intrinsic harmlessness of wrong-doing, +provided only the wrong-doer could escape +the fear of being caught, must have made us +aware that there are heights of nobleness, depths +of devotion, lengths of endurance, breadths of +sympathy altogether foreign to this easy-going, +pleasure-seeking view of life. Justice requires us +to dwell more explicitly on these Epicurean shortcomings. +Much that has been charged against +the school in the form of swinish sensuality is the +grossest slander. Still there are defects in this +view of life which are both logically deducible +from its premises, and practically visible in the +lives of its consistent disciples.</p> + +<p>The fundamental defect of Epicureanism is its +false definition of personality. According to +Epicurus the person is merely a bundle of appetites +and passions; and the gratification of these +is made synonymous with the satisfaction of himself. +But gratifications are short; while appetites +are long. The result is that which Schopenhauer +has so conclusively pointed out. During the long +periods when desire burns unsatisfied, the balance +of pleasure is against us. In the comparatively<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</a></span> +brief and rare intervals when passions are in process +of gratification, the balance can never be more +than even. Therefore our account with the world +at the end of any period, whether a week or a year +or a lifetime, is bound to stand as follows: credit, +a few rare, brief moments—moments, too, which +have long since vanished into nothingness—when +appetites and passions were in process of satisfaction. +Debit, the vast majority of moments, +amounting in the aggregate to almost the total +period considered, when appetites and passions +were clamouring for a satisfaction that was not +forthcoming. The obvious conclusion from the frequent +examination of the Epicurean account-book is +that which Schopenhauer so triumphantly demonstrates,—pessimism. +The sooner we cease doing +business on those terms, the less will be the balance +of pain, or unsatisfied desire, against us. To be +entirely frank, the devotees of Omar Khayyam +would have to confess that it is this note of pessimism, +despair, and self-pity, at the sorry contrast of +the vast unattainable and the petty attained, which +is the secret of his unquestionably fascinating lines. +Here the blasé amusement-seeker finds consolation +in the fact that a host of other people are also +yielding to the temptation to bury the unwelcome +consciousness of a self they cannot satisfy in wine,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</a></span> +or any other momentary sensuous titillation that +will conceal the sense of their spiritual failure—a +failure, however, which they are glad to be assured +is shared by so many that the sense of it has been +dignified by the name of a philosophy and sung +by a poet.</p> + +<p>Pleasure cannot be sought directly with success; +for pleasure comes indirectly as the effect of causes +far higher and deeper and wider than any that are +recognised in the Epicurean philosophy. Pleasure +comes unsought to those who lose themselves +in large intellectual, artistic, social, and spiritual +interests. But such noble losing of self without +thought of gain is explicitly excluded from the +consistent Epicurean creed.</p> + +<p>In the picture of the Epicurean life already +drawn, while domestic and political life have been +presupposed as a background, nothing has been +said about the sacrifice which one is called upon +to make in the support and defence of a pure +home and a free country. That was expressly +excluded by Epicurus. Whatever attractiveness +there was in the picture of the Epicurean life +previously presented was largely due to this background +of presupposition that this happy life was +lived in a well-ordered and stable family, and in a +free and just municipal and national life. In fact<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</a></span> +it is only as a parasite on these great domestic, +social, and political institutions which it does +nothing to create or maintain, and much to +weaken and destroy, that Epicureanism is even +a tolerable account of life. If we now paint +our picture of the Epicurean man and woman +with this background of domestic and civic life +withdrawn, the ugliness and meanness of this +parasitic Epicureanism will stare us in the face; +and while we ought not to forget the valuable +lessons it has to teach us, we shall shrink from +the completed picture as a thing of deformity and +degradation.</p> + +<p>Who then is the consistent Epicurean man? +He is the club man, who lives in easy luxury +and fares sumptuously every day. Everything +is done for him. Servants wait on him. He +serves nobody, and is responsible for no one's +welfare. He has a congenial set of cronies, +loosely attached to be sure; and constantly +changing, as matrimony, financial reverses, business +engagements, professional responsibilities call +one or another of his circle away to a more strenuous +life. He is a good fellow, genial, free-handed +with his set, indifferent to all who are outside. He +generally hires some woman to serve for a few +months as the instrument of his passions; only<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</a></span> +to cast her off to be hired by another and another +until in due time she dies, he cares not when or +how.</p> + +<p>As business men these Epicureans are apt to +be easy-going, and therefore failures. As debtors, +they are the hardest people in the world from whom +to collect a bill. As creditors or landlords they +are the most merciless in their exactions. Their +devotion to the state is generally confined to +betting on the elections; the returns of which +they watch with the same interest as the results +of a horse-race. Their religion is confined to +poking fun at the people who are foolish enough +to be going to church while they are at their +Sunday morning breakfast.</p> + +<p>We all know these Epicureans; we do business +with them; we meet them socially; we treat them +decently; but it is to be hoped that underneath +the smooth exterior we all detect their selfish +heartlessness. They have taken a doctrine, which, +as applied to the good things which are made to +minister to our appetites is sound and true, and +have perverted it into a moral monstrosity by +daring to treat human hearts and social institutions +as mere things, mere instruments of their +selfish pleasures.</p> + +<p>Epicurean women, likewise, abound in every<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</a></span> +wealthy community. They spend the winter in +Florida, New York, or Washington; dividing the +rest of the year between the sea-shore, the mountains, +and the lakes, with occasional visits to what +they call their homes. They must have the best +of everything, and assume no responsibility beyond +running up bills for their husbands to pay, or +to remain unpaid. Their special paradise is foreign +travel, and no pension or hotel along the +beaten highways of Europe is without its quota of +these precious daughters of Epicurus. They flit +hither and thither where least ennui and most +diversion allures. Two or three years of this +irresponsible existence is sufficient to disqualify +them for usefulness either in Europe or America, +either here or hereafter. When they return, +if they ever do, to their native town or city, +the drudgery of housekeeping has become intolerable, +the responsibilities of social life unendurable, +and their poor husbands are glad +enough when the restless fit seizes them again +and they can be packed off to Egypt, or Russia, +or whatever remote corner of the earth remains +for their idle hands and restless feet, their empty +minds and hollow hearts, to invade with their +unearned gold.</p> + +<p>There is no guarantee that the Epicurean<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</a></span> +will be the chaste husband of one wife, or +a faithful mother, or a good provider for the +family, or a devoted citizen of the republic, or +a strenuous servant of art or science, or a heroic +martyr in the cause of progress and reform. If +all men were Epicureans, the world would speedily +retrograde into the barbarism and animalism +whence it has slowly and painfully emerged. +The great interests of the family, the state, society, +and civilisation are not accurately reflected +in the feelings of the individual; and if the individual +has no guide but feeling, he will prove a +traitor to such of these higher interests as may +have the misfortune to be intrusted to his pleasure-loving, +self-indulgent, unheroic hands.</p> + +<p>There are hard things to do and to endure; and +if we are to meet them bravely, we shall have to +call the Stoic to our aid. There are sordid and +trivial things to put up with, or to rise above, and +there we may need at times the Platonist and the +mystic to show us the eternal reality underneath +the temporal appearance. There are problems +of conduct to be solved; conflicting claims to be +adjusted; and for this the Aristotelian sense +of proportion must be developed in our souls. +Finally there are other persons to be considered, +and one great Personal Spirit living and working<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</a></span> +in the world; and for our proper attitude toward +these persons, human and divine, we must look +to the Christian principle. To meet these higher +relationships with no better equipment than Epicureanism +offers, would be as foolish as to try to run +barefoot across a continent, or swim naked across +the sea. Naked, barefoot Epicureanism has its +place on the sandy beaches and in the sheltered +coves of life; but has no business on the mountain +tops or in the depths of human experience.</p> + +<p>It will not make a man an efficient workman, or +a thorough scholar, or a brave soldier, or a public-spirited +citizen. It spoils completely every woman +whom it gets hold of, unless at the same time she +has firm hold on something better; unless she +has a husband and children whom she loves, or +work in which she delights for its own sake, or +friends and interests dearer than life itself. Epicureanism +will not lift either man or woman far +toward heaven, or save them in the hour when the +pains of hell get hold of them. No home can be +reared on it. The divorce court is the logical +outcome of every marriage between a man and a +woman who are both Epicureans. For it is the +very essence of Epicureanism to treat others as +means; while no marriage is tolerable unless at least +one of the two parties is large and unselfish enough<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</a></span> +to treat the other as an end. No Epicurean state or +city could endure longer than it would take for the +men who are in politics for their pockets to plunder +the people who are out of politics for the same +reason. An Epicurean heaven, a place where +eternally each should get his fill of pleasure at the +expense of everybody else, would be insufferably +insipid, incomparably unendurable. It is fortunate +for the fame of Epicurus and the permanence +of his philosophy that he evaded the +necessity of thinking out the conditions of immortal +blessedness by his specious dilemma in which he +thought to prove that death ends all. As a temporary +parasite upon a political and moral order +already established, Epicureanism might thrive and +flourish; but as a principle on which to rest a decent +society here or a hope of heaven hereafter, Epicureanism +is utterly lacking. If there were nothing +better than Epicureanism in store for us through +the long eternities, we all might well pray to be +excused, as Epicurus happily believed we should +be. For any ultimate delight in life must be rooted +in something deeper than self-centred pleasure: +it must love persons and seek ends for their +own sake; and find its joy, not in the satisfaction +of the man as he is, but in the development of that +which his thought and love enable him to become.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>V<br /> +AN EXAMPLE OF EPICUREAN CHARACTER</h4> + +<p>The clearest example of the shortcomings of +Epicureanism is the character of Tito Melema +in George Eliot's "Romola." Pleasure and the +avoidance of pain are this young Greek's only +principles. He is "of so easy a conscience that +he would make a stepping-stone of his father's +corpse." "He has a lithe sleekness about him +that seems marvellously fitted for slipping into any +nest he fixes his mind on." "He had an unconquerable +aversion to any thing unpleasant, even when +an object very much loved and admired was on the +other side of it." According to his thinking "any +maxims that required a man to fling away the good +that was needed to make existence sweet, were only +the lining of human selfishness turned outward; +they were made by men who wanted others to +sacrifice themselves for their sake." "He would +rather that Baldassarre should not suffer; he +liked no one to suffer; but could any philosophy +prove to him that he was bound to care for another's +suffering more than for his own? To do +so, he must have loved Baldassarre devotedly, and +he did not love him: was that his own fault?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</a></span> +Gratitude! seen closely, it made no valid claim; +his father's life would have been dreary without +him; are we convicted of a debt to men for the +pleasure they give themselves?" "He had simply +chosen to make life easy to himself—to carry his +human lot if possible in such a way that it should +pinch him nowhere; but the choice had at various +times landed him in unexpected positions." "Tito +could not arrange life at all to his mind without +a considerable sum of money, and that problem of +arranging life to his mind had been the source of +all his misdoing." "He would have been equal to +any sacrifice that was not unpleasant." "Of other +goods than pleasure he can form no conception." +As Romola says in her reproaches: "You talk of +substantial good, Tito! Are faithfulness, and love, +and sweet grateful memories no good? Is it no +good that we should keep our silent promises on +which others build because they believe in our love +and truth? Is it no good that a just life should be +justly honoured? Or, is it good that we should +harden our hearts against all the wants and hopes +of those who have depended on us? What good +can belong to men who have such souls? To talk +cleverly, perhaps, and find soft couches for themselves, +and live and die with their base selves as +their best companions."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</a></span></p> + +<p>This pleasure-loving Tito Melema, "when he +was only seven years old, Baldassarre had rescued +from blows, had taken to a home that seemed +like opened paradise, where there was sweet food +and soothing caresses, all had on Baldassarre's +knee; and from that time till the hour they had +parted, Tito had been the one centre of Baldassarre's +fatherly cares." Instead of finding and +rescuing this man who, long years ago, had rescued +Tito when a little boy from a life of beggary, +filth, and cruel wrong, had reared him tenderly +and been to him as a father, Tito sold the jewels +which belonged to his father and would have +been sufficient to ransom him from slavery, and +finally, when found by Baldassarre in Florence, +denied him and pronounced him a madman. He +betrayed an innocent, trusting young girl into a +mock marriage, at the same time ruining her and +proving false to his lawful wife. He sold the +library which it was Romola's father's dying wish +to have kept in Florence as a distinct memorial +to his life and work. He entered into selfish intrigues +in the politics of the city, ready to betray +his associates and friends whenever his own +safety required it.</p> + +<p>What wonder that Romola came to have "her +new scorn of that thing called pleasure which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</a></span> +made men base—that dexterous contrivance for +selfish ease, that shrinking from endurance and +strain, when others were bowing beneath burdens +too heavy for them, which now made one image +with her husband." In her own distress she +learns from Savonarola that there is a higher law +than individual pleasure. "She felt that the +sanctity attached to all close relations, and therefore +preëminently to the closest, was but the expression +in outward law, of that result toward +which all human goodness and nobleness must +spontaneously tend; that the light abandonment +of ties, whether inherited or voluntary, because +they had ceased to be pleasant, was the uprooting +of social and personal virtue. What else had +Tito's crime toward Baldassarre been but that +abandonment working itself out to the most hideous +extreme of falsity and ingratitude? To her, +as to him, there had come one of those moments +in life when the soul must dare to act on its own +warrant, not only without external law to appeal +to, but in the face of a law which is not unarmed +with Divine lightnings—lightnings that may yet +fall if the warrant has been false." The whole +teaching of the book is summed up in the Epilogue. +In the conversation between Romola and +Tito's illegitimate son Lillo, Lillo says, "I should<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</a></span> +like to be something that would make me a great +man, and very happy besides—something that +would not hinder me from having a good deal of +pleasure."</p> + +<p>"That is not easy, my Lillo. It is only a poor +sort of happiness that could ever come by caring +very much about our own narrow pleasures. We +can only have the highest happiness, such as +goes along with being a great man, by having +wide thoughts, and much feeling for the rest of +the world as well as ourselves; and this sort of +happiness often brings so much pain with it, that +we can only tell it from pain by its being what +we would choose before everything else, because +our souls see it is good. There are so many +things wrong and difficult in the world, that no +man can be great—he can hardly keep himself +from wickedness—unless he gives up thinking +much about pleasure or rewards, and gets strength +to endure what is hard and painful. My father +had the greatness that belongs to integrity; he +chose poverty and obscurity rather than falsehood. +And there was Fra Girolamo—you know why I +keep to-morrow sacred; he had the greatness +which belongs to a life spent in struggling against +powerful wrong, and in trying to raise men to the +highest deeds they are capable of. And so, my<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span> +Lillo, if you mean to act nobly and seek to know +the best things God has put within reach of men, +you must learn to fix your mind on that end, and +not on what will happen to you because of it. +And remember, if you were to choose something +lower, and make it the rule of your life to seek +your own pleasure, and escape from what is disagreeable, +calamity might come just the same; and +it would be calamity falling on a base mind, which +is the one form of sorrow that has no balm in it, +and that may well make a man say, 'It would have +been better for me if I had never been born.'"</p> + +<p>The trouble with Epicureanism is its assumption +that the self is a bundle of natural appetites +and passions, and that the end of life is +their gratification. Experience shows, as in the +case of Tito, that such a policy consistently pursued, +brings not pleasure but pain—pain first +of all to others, and then pain to the individual +through their contempt, indignation, and vengeance. +The truest pleasure must come through +the development within one of generous emotions, +kind sympathies, and large social interests. The +man must be made over before the pleasures of +the new man can be rightly sought and successfully +found. This making over of man is no consistent +part of the logical Epicurean programme,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</a></span> +and consequently pure Epicureanism is sure to land +one in the narrowness, selfishness, and heartlessness +of a Tito Melema, and to bring upon one +essentially the same condemnation and disaster.</p> + +<p>Still, not in criticism or unkindness would we +take leave of the serene and genial Epicurus. +We may frankly recognise his fundamental limitations, +and yet gratefully accept the good counsel +he has to give. Parasite as it is,—a thing that can +only live by sucking its life out of ideals and principles +higher and hardier than itself, it is yet +a graceful and ornamental parasite, which will +beautify and shield the hard outlines of our +more strenuous principles. There are dreary +wastes in all our lives, into which we can profitably +turn those streams of simple pleasure he +commends. There are points of undue strain +and tension where Epicurean prudence would bid +us forego the slight fancied gain to save the +ruinous expense to health and happiness. Let +us fill up these gaps with hearty indulgence of +healthy appetite, with vigorous exercise of dormant +powers, with the eager joys of new-learned +recreations. Let us tone down the strain and +tension of our anxious, worried, worn, and weary +lives by the rigid elimination of the superfluous, +the strict concentration on the perpetual present,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</a></span> +the resolute banishment from it of all past or +future springs of depression and discouragement. +Before we are through we shall see far nobler +ideals than this; but we must not despise the day +of small things. Though the lowest and least of +them all, the Epicurean is one of the historical +ideals of life. It has its claims which none of +us may with impunity ignore. To serve him +faithfully in the lower spheres of life is a wholesome +preparation for the intelligent and reasonable +service of Stoic, Platonic, Aristotelian, and +Christian ideals which rule the higher realms. +He who is false to the humble, homely demands +of Epicurus can never be quite at his +best in the grander service of Zeno and Plato, +Aristotle and Jesus.</p> + + +<h4>VI<br /> +THE CONFESSIONS OF AN EPICUREAN HERETIC</h4> + +<p>A heretic is a man who, while professing to +hold the tenets of the sect to which he adheres, +and sincerely believing that he is in substantial +agreement with his more orthodox brethren, yet +in his desire to be honest and reasonable, so +modifies these tenets as to empty them of all +that is distinctive of the sect in question, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</a></span> +thus unintentionally gives aid and comfort to its +enemies. Every vigorous and vital school of +thought soon or late develops this species of +<i>enfant terrible</i>. Like the Christian church, the +Epicurean school has been blessed with numerous +progeny of this disturbing sort. The one +among them all who most stoutly professes the +fundamental principles of Epicureanism, and then +proceeds to admit pretty much everything its +opponents advance against it, is John Stuart Mill. +His "Utilitarianism" is a fort manned with the most +approved idealistic guns, yet with the Epicurean +flag floating bravely over the whole. He "holds +that actions are right in proportion as they tend +to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to +produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness +is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by +unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure. +Pleasure and freedom from pain are the only +things desirable as ends; and all desirable things +are desirable either for the pleasure inherent in +themselves, or as means to the promotion of +pleasure and the prevention of pain." A more +square and uncompromising statement of Epicureanism +than this it would be impossible to +make.</p> + +<p>Having thus squarely identified himself with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</a></span> +the Epicurean school, Mr. Mill proceeds to add +to this doctrine in turn the doctrines of each one +of the four schools which we are to consider +later. First he introduces a distinction in the +kind of pleasure, "assigning to the pleasures of +the intellect, of the feelings and imagination, and +of the moral sentiments, a much higher value as +pleasures than to those of mere sensation." +When asked what he means by difference of +quality in pleasures, or what makes one pleasure +more valuable than another, merely as a pleasure, +except its being greater in amount, although he +tells us there is but one possible answer, he +gives us two or three. First he appeals to the +verdict of competent judges. "Of two pleasures, +if there be one to which all or almost all who +have experience of both give a decided preference, +irrespective of any feeling of moral +obligation to prefer it, that is the more desirable +pleasure. If one of the two is, by those +who are competently acquainted with both, placed +so far above the other that they prefer it, even +though knowing it to be attended with a greater +amount of discontent, and would not resign it +for any quantity of the other pleasure which +their nature is capable of, we are justified in +ascribing to the preferred enjoyment a superi<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</a></span>ority +in quality, so far outweighing quantity as +to render it, in comparison, of small account."</p> + +<p>This appeal to competent judges, or, in other +words, to authority, involves no philosophical +principle at all unless we may call the doctrine +of papal infallibility, to which this appeal of +Mill is essentially akin, a principle. If these +judges are competent, there must be a reason +for the preference they give. In the next paragraph +Mill tells us what that principle is; but +in doing so introduces the principle of the subordination +of lower to higher faculties, which we +shall see later is the distinguishing principle of +Plato. On this point Mill is as clear as Plato +himself. "Now it is an unquestionable fact that +those who are equally acquainted with, and +equally capable of appreciating and enjoying +both, do give a most marked preference to the +manner of existence which employs their higher +faculties. Few human creatures would consent +to be changed into any of the lower animals, +for a promise of the fullest allowance of a +beast's pleasures; no intelligent human being +would consent to be a fool, no instructed person +would be an ignoramus, no person of feeling +and conscience would be selfish and base, even +though they should be persuaded that the fool,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</a></span> +the dunce, or the rascal is better satisfied with +his lot than they are with theirs. They would +not resign what they possess more than he, +for the most complete satisfaction of all the +desires which they have in common with him. +If they ever fancy they would, it is only in cases +of unhappiness so extreme, that to escape from +it they would exchange their lot for almost any +other, however undesirable in their own eyes. +A being of higher faculties requires more to +make him happy, is capable probably of more +acute suffering, and is certainly accessible to it +at more points, than one of an inferior type; +but in spite of these liabilities, he can never +really wish to sink into what he feels to be a +lower grade of existence." This appeal to +quality rather than quantity of pleasure puts +Mill, in spite of himself, squarely on Platonic +ground and abandons consistent Epicureanism. +An illustration will make this clear. A man +professes that money is his supreme end, the +only thing he cares for in the world; he tells +us that whatever he does is done for money, and +whenever he refrains from doing anything it is +to avoid losing money. So far he puts his conduct +on a consistently mercenary basis. Suppose, +however, that in the next sentence he tells us<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</a></span> +that he prizes certain kinds of money. If we +ask him what is the basis of the distinction, he +replies that he prizes money honestly earned and +despises money dishonestly acquired. Should we +not at once recognise, that in spite of his original +declaration, he is not the consistently mercenary +being he professed himself to be? The +fact that he prefers honest to dishonest money +shows that honesty, not money, is his real principle; +and, in spite of his original profession, this +distinction lifts him out of the class of mercenary +money lovers into the class of men whose +real principle is not money but honesty. Precisely +so Mill's confession that he cares for the +height and dignity of the faculties employed +rather than the quantity of pleasure gained lifts +him out of the Epicurean school to which he +professes adherence and makes him an idealist.</p> + +<p>When asked for an explanation of his preference +of higher to lower, Mill at once shifts to +Stoic ground in the following sentences: "We +may give what explanation we please of this +unwillingness; we may attribute it to pride, a +name which is given indiscriminately to some of +the most and to some of the least estimable feelings +of which mankind are capable; we may refer +it to the love of liberty and personal independence,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</a></span> +an appeal to which was with the Stoics one of the +most effective means for the inculcation of it; to +the love of power, or to the love of excitement, +both of which do really enter into and contribute +to it; but its most appropriate appellation is a +sense of dignity, which all human beings possess +in one form or another, and in some, though by +no means in exact, proportion to their highest +faculties, and which is so essential a part of the +happiness of those in whom it is strong, that +nothing which conflicts with it could be, otherwise +than momentarily, an object of desire to them. +Whoever supposes that this preference takes +place at a sacrifice of happiness—that the superior +being, in anything like equal circumstances, +is not happier than the inferior—confounds the +two very different ideas of happiness and content. +It is indisputable that the being whose capacities +of enjoyment are low has the greatest chance of +having them fully satisfied; and a highly endowed +being will always feel that any happiness which +we can look for, as the world is constituted, is imperfect. +But he can learn to bear its imperfections +if they are at all bearable; and they will not +make him envy the being who is indeed unconscious +of the imperfections, but only because he +feels not at all the good which those imperfec<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</a></span>tions +qualify. It is better to be a human being +dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates +dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if +the fool, or the pig, is of a different opinion, it is +because they only know their own side of the +question. The other party to the comparison +knows both sides."</p> + +<p>When pressed for a sanction of motive Mill appeals +to the Aristotelian principle that the individual +can only realise his conception of himself +through union with his fellows in society: to +the social nature of man and his inability to +find himself in any smaller sphere, or through +devotion to any lesser end. "This firm foundation +is that of the social feelings of mankind; +the desire to be in unity with our fellow-creatures, +which is already a powerful principle in human +nature, and happily one of those which tend to +become stronger, even without express inculcation, +from the influences of advancing civilisation. +The social state is at once so natural, so necessary, +and so habitual to man, that, except in some unusual +circumstances or by an effort of voluntary +abstraction, he never conceives himself otherwise +than as a member of a body; and this association +is riveted more and more, as mankind are +farther removed from the state of savage in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</a></span>dependence. +Any condition, therefore, which +is essential to a state of society, becomes more +and more an inseparable part of every person's +conception of the state of things which he is +born into, and which is the destiny of a human +being. In this way people grow up unable +to conceive as possible to them a state of total +disregard of other people's interests. They are +under a necessity of conceiving themselves as at +least abstaining from all the grosser injuries, and +(if only for their own protection) living in a state +of constant protest against them. They are also +familiar with the fact of coöperating with others, +and proposing to themselves a collective, not an +individual, interest, as the aim (at least for the +time being) of their actions. So long as they are +coöperating, their ends are identified with those +of others; there is at least a temporary feeling +that the interests of others are their own interests. +Not only does all strengthening of social ties, and +all healthy growth of society, give to each individual +a stronger personal interest in practically +consulting the welfare of others; it also leads him +to identify his feelings more and more with their +good, or at least with an ever greater degree +of practical consideration for it. He comes, as +though instinctively, to be conscious of himself as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</a></span> +a being who of course pays regard to others. +The good of others becomes to him a thing naturally +and necessarily to be attended to. This +mode of conceiving ourselves and human life, as +civilisation goes on, is felt to be more and more +natural. Every step in political improvement +renders it more so by removing the sources of +opposition of interest, and levelling those inequalities +of legal privilege between individuals or +classes, owing to which there are large portions +of mankind whose happiness it is still practicable +to disregard. In an improving state of the human +mind, the influences are constantly on the increase, +which tend to generate in each individual +a feeling of unity with all the rest; which feeling, +if perfect, would make him never think of, or desire, +any beneficial condition for himself, in the +benefits of which they are not included. The +deeply rooted conception which every individual +even now has of himself as a social being tends to +make him feel it one of his natural wants that there +should be harmony between his feelings and aims +and those of his fellow-creatures. It does not +present itself to their minds as a superstition of +education, or a law despotically imposed by the +power of society, but as an attribute which it +would not be well for them to be without."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</a></span></p> + +<p>Lastly Mill introduces the Christian ideal. "As +between his own happiness and that of others, +utilitarianism requires him to be as strictly impartial +as a disinterested and benevolent spectator. +In the golden rule of Jesus of Nazareth, we read +the complete spirit of the ethics of utility. To do +as one would be done by, and to love one's neighbour +as one's self, constitute the ideal perfection of +utilitarian morality." In his attempt to prove the +Christian obligation on an Epicurean basis the inconsistency +between his Epicurean principle and his +Christian preaching and practice becomes evident. +Master of logic as Mill was, an author of a standard +text-book on the subject, yet so desperate was +the plight in which his attempt to stretch Epicureanism +to Christian dimensions placed him, that +he was compelled to resort to the following fallacy +of composition, the fallaciousness of which every +student of logic recognises at a glance. "Happiness +is a good; each person's happiness is a good to +that person, and the general happiness, therefore, +a good to the aggregate of all persons." As Carlyle +has pointed out, this is equivalent to saying, +since each pig wants all the swill in the trough for +itself, a litter of pigs in the aggregate will desire +each member of the litter to have its share of the +whole,—a fallacy which a single experience in feed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span>ing +pigs will sufficiently refute. It requires something +deeper and higher than Epicurean principles +to lift men to a plane where Christian altruism is +the natural and inevitable conduct which Mill +rightly says it ought to be.</p> + +<p>These confessions of an Epicurean heretic, +wrung from a man who had been rigidly trained by +a stern father in Epicurean principles, yet whose +surpassing candour compelled him to make these +admissions, so fatal to the system, so ennobling to +the man and to the doctrine he proclaimed, serve +as an admirable preparation for the succeeding +chapters, where these same principles, which Mill +introduces as supplements, and modifications, and +amendments to Epicureanism, will be presented as +the foundation-stones of larger and deeper views +of life. Mill starts with a jack-knife which he +publicly proclaims to be in every part of the +handle and in every blade through and through +Epicurean; then gets a new handle from the +Stoics; borrows one blade from Plato, and another +from Aristotle; unconsciously steals the biggest +blade of all from Christianity; makes one of the +best knives to be found on the moral market: +yet still, in loyalty to early parental training, insists +on calling the finished product by the same name +as that with which he started out. The result is a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</a></span> +splendid knife to cut with; but a difficult one to +classify. Our quest for the principles of personality +will not bring us anything much better, for +practical purposes, than the lofty teaching of Mill's +"Utilitarianism," and its companion in inconsistency, +Herbert Spencer's "Principles of Ethics." All our +five principles are present in these so-called hedonistic +treatises. But it is a great theoretical advantage, +and ultimately carries with it considerable +practical gain, to give credit where credit is due, +and to call things by their right names. Thanks +to the candour of these heretics, though the names +we encounter hereafter will be new, we shall greet +most of the principles we discover under these new +names as old friends to whom the Epicurean heretics +gave us our first introduction.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</a></span></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_II" id="CHAPTER_II"></a>CHAPTER II</h2> + +<h3>STOIC SELF-CONTROL BY LAW</h3> + + +<h4>I<br /> +THE PSYCHOLOGICAL LAW OF APPERCEPTION</h4> + +<p>The shortest way to understand the Stoic principle +is through the psychological doctrine of +apperception. According to this now universally +accepted doctrine, the mind is not an empty cabinet +into which ready-made impressions of external +things are dumped. The mind is an active process; +and the meaning and value of any sensation +presented from without is determined by the +reaction upon it of the ideas and aims that are +dominant within. This doctrine has revolutionised +psychology and pedagogy, and when rightly +introduced into the personal life proves even more +revolutionary there. Stoicism works this doctrine +for all that it is worth. Christian Science and +kindred popular cults of the present day are perhaps +working it for rather more than it is worth.</p> + +<p>Translated into simple everyday terms, this doctrine +in its application to the personal life means<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</a></span> +that the value of any external fact or possession or +experience depends on the way in which we take +it. Take riches, for example. Stocks and bonds, +real estate and mortgages, money and bank accounts, +in themselves do not make a man either +rich or poor. They may enrich or they may impoverish +his personality. It is not until they are +taken up into the mind, thought over, related to +one's general scheme of conduct, made the basis of +one's purposes and plans, that they become a factor +in the personal life. Obviously the same +amount of money, a hundred thousand dollars, +may be worked over into personal life in a great +variety of ways. One man is made proud by it. +Another is made lazy. Another is made hard-hearted. +Another is made avaricious for more. +Another is fired with the desire to speculate. +Another is filled with anxiety lest he may lose it. +All these are obviously impoverished by the so-called +wealth which they possess. To rich men's +wives and children, whose wealth comes without +the strenuous exertion and close human contact +involved in earning it, it generally works +their personal impoverishment in one or more of +these fatal ways. For wealth, in an indolent, self-indulgent, +vain, conceited, ostentatious, unsympathetic mind, +takes on the colour of these odious<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</a></span> +qualities, and becomes a curse to its possessor; +just because he or she is cursed with these evil +propensities already, and the wealth simply adds +fuel to the preëxistent, though perhaps latent and +smouldering flames.</p> + +<p>On the other hand one man is made grateful +for the wealth he has been able to accumulate. +Another is made more sympathetic. Another is +made generous. Another is urged into the larger +public service his independent means makes possible. +Another is lifted up into a sense of responsibility +for its right use. On the whole the men +and women who earn their money honestly are +usually affected in one or more of these beneficial +ways, and their wealth becomes an enrichment of +their personality.</p> + +<p>Now it is impossible that this hundred thousand +dollars should get into any man's mind, and become +a mental state, without its being mixed with +one or other of these mental, emotional, and volitional +accompaniments. The mental state, in other +words, is a compound, of which the external fact, +in this case the hundred thousand dollars, is the +least important ingredient. It is so unimportant +a factor that the Stoics pronounced it indifferent. +The tone and temper in which we accept our +riches, the ends to which we devote them, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span> +spirit in which we hold them, the way in which +we spend them, are so vastly more important than +the mere fact of having them, that by comparison, +the fact itself seems indifferent. Like all strong +statements, this is doubtless an exaggeration. +You cannot have just the same mental state +without riches that you can have with them. +The external fact is a factor, though a relatively +small one, in the composite mental state. The +virtues of a rich man are not precisely the same +as the virtues of a poor man. Yet the Stoic +paradox is very much nearer the truth than the +statement of the average man, that external +things are the whole, or even the most important +part of our mental states.</p> + +<p>The same thing is true of health and sickness. +Health often makes one careless, insensitive, negligent +of duty; while sickness often makes one +conscientious, considerate, faithful, and thus more +useful and efficient than his healthy brother. Popularity +often puffs up with pride; while persecution, +by humbling, prepares the heart for truer blessedness. +Hence whether an external fact is good or +evil, depends on how we take it, what we make of +it, the state of mind and heart and will into which +it enters as a factor; and that in turn depends, the +Stoic tells us, on ourselves, and is under our control<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</a></span> +Stoicism is fundamentally this psychological doctrine +of apperception, carried over and applied in +the field of the personal life,—the doctrine, namely, +that no external thing alone can affect us for good +or evil, until we have woven it into the texture of +our mental life, painted it with the colour of our +dominant mood and temper, and stamped it with +the approval of our will. Thus everything except +a slight residuum is through and through mental, +our own product, the expression of what we are +and desire to be. The only difference between +Stoicism and Christian Science at this point is that +Stoicism recognises the material element; though +it does so only to minimise it, and pronounce it +indifferent. Christian Science denies that there is +any physical fact, or even the raw material out of +which to make one. All is merely mental, says +the consistent Christian Scientist with the toothache. +There is no matter there to ache. The +Stoic, truer to the facts, and in not less but +more heroic spirit declares: "There is matter, but +it doesn't matter if there is." The toothache can +be taken as a spur to greater fortitude and +equanimity than the man whose teeth are all sound +has had opportunity to practically exemplify; +and so the total mental state, toothache-borne-with-fortitude, +may be positively good.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</a></span></p> + +<p>This doctrine that external things never in +themselves constitute a mental state; that they are +consequently indifferent; that the all-important +contribution is made by the mind itself; that this +contribution from the mind is what gives the tone +and determines the worth of the total mental state; +and that this contribution is exclusively our own +affair and may be brought entirely under our own +control;—this is the first and most fundamental +Stoic principle. If we have grasped this principle, +we are prepared to read intelligently and sympathetically +the otherwise startling and paradoxical +deliverances of the Stoic masters.</p> + + +<h4>II<br /> +SELECTIONS FROM THE STOIC SCRIPTURES</h4> + +<p>First let us listen to Epictetus, the slave, the +Stoic of the cottage as he has been called:—</p> + +<p>"Everything has two handles: one by which it +may be borne, another by which it cannot. If +your brother acts unjustly, do not lay hold on the +affair by the handle of his injustice, for by that it +cannot be borne; but rather by the opposite, that +he is your brother, that he was brought up with +you, and thus you will lay hold on it as it is to be +borne." Here the handle is a homely but effec<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</a></span>tive +figure for the mass of mental association into +which the external fact of a brother who acts +unjustly is introduced before he actually enters +our mental state, and determines how we shall feel +and act.</p> + +<p>"If a person had delivered up your body to some +passer-by, you would certainly be angry. And do +you feel no shame in delivering up your mind to +any reviler, to be disconcerted and confounded?" +The reviling does not become a determining factor +in my own mental state unless I choose to +let it. If I feel humiliated and stung by it, it is +because I am weak and foolish enough to stake +my estimate of myself, and my consequent happiness, +upon what somebody who does not know me +says about me, rather than on what I, who know +myself better than anybody else, actually think. +A boy at Phillips Andover Academy once drew +this distinction very adroitly for another boy. +There had been a free fight among the boys causing +a great deal of disturbance, and Principal +Bancroft had traced the beginning of it to an +insulting remark on the part of the boy in +question. Dr. Bancroft accused him of beginning +the trouble. "No, sir," said the boy, "I did not +begin it. The other fellow began it." "Well," +said Principal Bancroft, "you tell me precisely what<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</a></span> +took place, and I will decide who began it." "Oh," +replied the boy, "I simply called him a 'darned' +fool, and he took offence." Now if the other boy +had been a Stoic, he would not have taken offence, +and the first boy might have called him a fool with +impunity. Imputing Stoicism to that extent to +other people, however, is very dangerous business. +Stoicism is a doctrine to be strictly applied to ourselves, +but never imputed to other people, least +of all to the people we wish to abuse and revile.</p> + +<p>Epictetus again states his doctrine most explicitly +on the subject of terrors. "Men are disturbed +not by things, but by the view which they +take of things. Thus death is nothing terrible +else it would have appeared so to Socrates. But +the terror consists in our notion of death, that it is +terrible. When, therefore, we are hindered, or +disturbed, or grieved, let us never impute it to +others, but to ourselves; that is, to our views."</p> + +<p>Again he makes a sharp distinction between +what is in our power,—that is, what we think about +things; and what are not in our power,—that is external +facts. "There are things which are within our +power, and there are things which are beyond our +power. Within our power are opinion, aim, desire, +aversion, and, in one word, whatever affairs are our +own. Beyond our power are body, property,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span> +reputation, office, and, in one word, whatever are +not properly our own affairs."</p> + +<p>"Now the things within our power are by +nature free, unrestricted, unhindered; but those +beyond our power are weak, dependent, restricted, +alien. Remember, then, that if you attribute freedom +to things by nature dependent, and seek for +your own that which is really controlled by others, +you will be hindered, you will lament, you will be disturbed, +you will find fault both with gods and men. +But if you take for your own only that which is +your own, and view what belongs to others just as it +really is, then no one will ever compel you, no one +will restrict you; you will find fault with no one, you +will accuse no one, you will do nothing against +your will; no one will hurt you, you will not have +an enemy, nor will you suffer any harm."</p> + +<p>All this is simply carrying out the principle that +we need not concern ourselves about purely external +things, for those things pure and simple +can never get into our minds, or affect us one way +or the other. The only things that enter into us +are things as we think about them, facts as we +feel about them, forces as we react upon them, +and these thoughts, feelings, and reactions are our +own affairs; and if we do not think serenely, feel +tranquilly, and act freely with reference to them,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</a></span> +it is not the fault of external things, but of ourselves.</p> + +<p>In his discourse on tranquillity Epictetus gives +us the same counsel. "Consider, you who are +about to undergo trial, what you wish to preserve, +and in what to succeed. For if you wish to preserve +a mind in harmony with nature, you are +entirely safe; everything goes well; you have no +trouble on your hands. While you wish to preserve +that freedom which belongs to you, and are contented +with that, for what have you longer to be +anxious? For who is the master of things like +these? Who can take them away? If you wish +to be a man of modesty and fidelity, who shall +prevent you? If you wish not to be restrained +or compelled, who shall compel you to desires +contrary to your principles? to aversions contrary +to your opinion? The judge, perhaps, will pass a +sentence against you which he thinks formidable; +but can he likewise make you receive it with +shrinking? Since, then, desire and aversion are in +your power, for what have you to be anxious?"</p> + +<p>Epictetus bids us meet difficulties in the same +way. "Difficulties are things that show what +men are. For the future, in case of any difficulty, +remember that God, like a gymnastic trainer, has +pitted you against a rough antagonist. For what<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</a></span> +end? That you may be an Olympic conqueror; +and this cannot be without toil. No man, in my +opinion, has a more profitable difficulty on his hands +than you have, provided you but use it as an +athletic champion uses his antagonist."</p> + +<p>Epictetus does not shrink from the logic of his +teaching in its application to the sorrows of others, +though here it is tempered by a concession to the +weakness of ordinary mortals. "When you see a +person weeping in sorrow, either when a child goes +abroad, or when he is dead, or when the man has +lost his property, take care that the appearance +do not hurry you away with it as if he were +suffering in external things. But straightway +make a distinction in your mind, and be in readiness +to say, it is not that which has happened that +afflicts this man, for it does not afflict another, but +it is the opinion about this thing which afflicts the +man. So far as words, then, do not be unwilling +to show him sympathy, and even if it happens so, +to lament with him. But take care that you do +not lament internally also." At this point, if not +before, we feel that Stoicism is doing violence to +the nobler feelings of our nature, and are prepared +to break with it. Stoicism is too hard and cold +and individualistic to teach us our duty, or even to +leave us free to act out our best inclinations, toward<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</a></span> +our neighbour. We may be as Stoical as we please +in our own troubles and afflictions; but let us +beware how we carry over its icy distinctions into +our interpretation of our neighbour's suffering.</p> + +<p>I have drawn most of my illustrations from +Epictetus, because this resignation comes with +rather better grace from a poor, lame man, who +has been a slave, and who lives on the barest +necessities of life, than from the Emperor Marcus +Aurelius, and the wealthy courtier Seneca. Yet the +most distinctive utterances of these men teach the +same lesson. Seneca attributes it to his pilot in +the famous prayer, "Oh, Neptune, you may save +me if you will; you may sink me if you will; but +whatever happens, I shall keep my rudder true." +Marcus Aurelius says: "Let the part of thy soul +which leads and governs be undisturbed by the +movements in the flesh, whether of pleasure or +pain; and let it not unite itself with them, but let +it circumscribe itself, and limit those effects to +their parts." "Let it make no difference to thee +whether thou art cold or warm, if thou art doing +thy duty, and whether dying or doing something +else. For it is one of the acts of life,—this act by +which we die; it is sufficient then in this act also +to do well what we have in hand." "External +things touch not the soul, not in the least degree."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</a></span> +"Remember on every occasion which leads thee to +vexation to apply this principle: that this is not a +misfortune, but to bear it nobly is good fortune."</p> + +<p>The most recent prophet of Stoicism is Maurice +Maeterlinck. In "Wisdom and Destiny," he +says:—</p> + +<p>"The event itself is pure water that flows from +the pitcher of fate, and seldom has it either savour +or perfume or colour. But even as the soul may be +wherein it seeks shelter, so will the event become +joyous or sad, become tender or hateful, become +deadly or quick with life. To those round about +us there happen incessant and countless adventures, +whereof every one, it would seem, contains +a germ of heroism; but the adventure passes +away, and heroic deed there is none. But when +Jesus Christ met the Samaritan, met a few children, +an adulterous woman, then did humanity rise +three times in succession to the level of God."</p> + +<p>"It might almost be said that there happens to +men only that they desire. It is true that on certain +external events our influence is of the feeblest, +but we have all-powerful action on that which these +events shall become in ourselves—in other words, +on their spiritual part. The life of most men will +be saddened or lightened by the thing that may +chance to befall them,—in the men whom I speak<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</a></span> +of, whatever may happen is lit up by their inward +life. If you have been deceived, it is not the deception +that matters, but the forgiveness whereto +it gave birth in your soul, and the loftiness, wisdom, +completeness of this forgiveness,—by these +shall your eyes see more clearly than if all men +had ever been faithful. But if, by this act of +deceit, there have come not more simpleness, +loftier faith, wider range to your love, then have +you been deceived in vain, and may truly say +nothing has happened."</p> + +<p>"Let us always remember that nothing befalls +us that is not of the nature of ourselves. There +comes no adventure but wears to our soul the +shape of our everyday thoughts; and deeds of +heroism are but offered to those who, for many +long years, have been heroes in obscurity and +silence. And whether you climb up the mountain +or go down the hill to the valley, whether you +journey to the end of the world or merely walk +round your house, none but yourself shall you +meet on the highway of fate. If Judas go forth +to-night, it is toward Judas his steps will tend, nor +will chance for betrayal be lacking; but let Socrates +open his door,—he shall find Socrates asleep +on the threshold before him, and there will be occasion +for wisdom. We become that which we dis<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</a></span>cover +in the sorrows and joys that befall us; and +the least expected caprices of fate soon mould +themselves to our thought. It is in our past that +Destiny finds all her weapons, her vestments, her +jewels. A sorrow your soul has changed into +sweetness, to indulgence or patient smiles, is a sorrow +that shall never return without spiritual ornament; +and a fault or defect you have looked in the +face can harm you no more. All that has thus +been transformed can belong no more to the hostile +powers. Real fatality exists only in certain +external disasters—as disease, accident, the sudden +death of those we love; but inner fatality +there is none. Wisdom has will power sufficient +to rectify all that does not deal death to the body; +it will even at times invade the narrow domain of +external fatality. Even when the deed has been +done, the misfortune has happened, it still rests +with ourselves to deny her the least influence on +that which shall come to pass in our soul. She +may strike at the heart that is eager for good, but +still is she helpless to keep back the light that +shall stream to this heart from the error acknowledged, +the pain undergone. It is not in her power +to prevent the soul from transforming each single +affliction into thoughts, into feelings, and treasure +she dare not profane. Be her empire never so<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</a></span> +great over all things external, she always must +halt when she finds on the threshold a silent guardian +of the inner life. For even as triumph of +dictators and consuls could be celebrated only in +Rome, so can the true triumph of Fate take place +nowhere save in our soul."</p> + +<p>It would be easy to cite passage after passage +in which the great masters of Stoicism ring the +changes on this idea, that the external thing, +whether it be good or evil, cannot get into the fortified +citadel of my mind, and therefore cannot +touch me. Before it can touch me it must first be +incorporated into my mind. In the very act of +incorporation it undergoes a transformation, which +in the perverse man may change the best external +things into poison and bitterness; and in the sage +is able to convert the worst of external facts into +virtue, glory, and honour. Out of indifferent external +matter, thinking makes the world in which we +live; and if it is not a good world, the fault is, +not with the indifferent external matters,—such as, +to take Epictetus's enumeration of them, "wealth, +health, life, death, pleasure, and pain, which lie +between the virtues and the vices,"—but in our +weak and erroneous thinking.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>III<br /> +THE STOIC REVERENCE FOR UNIVERSAL LAW</h4> + +<p>The first half of the Stoic doctrine is that we +give our world the colour of our thoughts. The +second half of Stoicism is concerned with what +these thoughts of ours shall be. The first half of +the doctrine alone would leave us in crude fantastic +Cynicism,—the doctrine out of which the +broader and deeper Stoic teaching took its rise. +The Cynic paints the world in the flaring colours of +his undisciplined, individual caprice. Modern apostles +of the essential Stoic principle incline to paint +the world in the roseate hues of a merely optional +optimism. They want to be well, and happy, and +serene, and self-satisfied; they think they are; and +thinking makes them so. If Stoicism had been +as superficial as that, as capricious, and temperamental, +and individualistic, it would not have lasted +as it has for more than two thousand years. The +Stoic thought had substance, content, objective +reality, as unfortunately most of the current phases +of popular philosophy have not. This objective +and universal principle the Stoic found in law. +We must think things, not as we would like to +have them, which is the optimism of the fabled os<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</a></span>trich, +with its head in the sand; not in some vague, +general phrases which mean nothing, which is the +optimism of mysticism: but in the hard, rigid terms +of universal law. Everything that happens is part +of the one great whole. The law of the whole +determines the nature and worth of the part. +Seen from the point of view of the whole, every +part is necessary, and therefore good,—everything +except, as Cleanthes says in his hymn, "what the +wicked do in their foolishness." The typical evils +of life can all be brought under the Stoic formula, +under some beneficial law; all, that is, except sin. +That particular form of evil was not satisfactorily +dealt with until the advent of Christianity.</p> + +<p>Take evils of accident to begin with. An aged +man slips on the ice, falls, breaks a bone, and is +left, like Epictetus, lame for life. The particular +application of the law of gravitation in this case +has unfortunate results for the individual. But +the law is good. We should not know how to +get along in the world without this beneficent law. +Shall we repine and complain against the law that +holds the stars and planets in their courses, shapes +the mountains, sways the tides, brings down the +rain, and draws the rivers to the sea, turning ten +thousand mill-wheels of industry as it goes rejoicing +on its way; shall we complain against this law<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</a></span> +because in one instance in a thousand million it +chances to throw down an individual, which happens +to be me, and breaks a bone or two of mine, +and leaves me for the brief span of my remaining +pilgrimage with a limping gait? If Epictetus +could say to his cruel master under torture, "You +will break my leg if you keep on," and then when +it broke could smilingly add, "I told you so,"—cannot +we endure with fortitude, and even grateful +joy, the incidental inflictions which so beneficent a +master as the great law of gravitation in its magnificent +impartiality may see fit to mete out to us?</p> + +<p>A current of electricity, seeking its way from +sky to earth, finds on some particular occasion the +body of a beloved husband, a dear son, an honoured +father of dependent children, the best conductor +between the air and the earth, and kills the person +through whose body it takes its swift and fatal +course. Yet this law has no malevolence in its +impartial heart. On the contrary the beneficent +potency of the laws of electricity is so great that +our largest hopes for the improvement of our economic +condition rest on its unexplored resources.</p> + +<p>A group of bacteria, ever alert to find matter not +already appropriated and held in place by vital +forces stronger than their own, find their food and +breeding place within a human body, and subject<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</a></span> +our friend or our child to weeks of fever, and perchance +to death. Yet we cannot call evil the great +biological law that each organism shall seek its +meat from God wherever it can find it. Indeed +were it not for these micro-organisms, and their +alertness to seize upon and transform into their +own living substance everything morbid and unwholesome, +the whole earth would be nothing but +a vast charnel house reeking with the intolerable +stench of the undisintegrated and unburied dead.</p> + +<p>The most uncompromising exponent of this +second half of the Stoic doctrine in the modern +world is Immanuel Kant. According to him the +whole worth and dignity of life turns not on +external fortune, nor even on good natural endowments, +but on our internal reaction, the reverence +of our will for universal law. "Nothing +can possibly be conceived in the world, or even +out of it, which can be called good without qualification, +except a Good Will. Intelligence, wit, +judgment, and the other <i>talents</i> of the mind, however +they may be named, or courage, resolution, +perseverance, as qualities of temperament, are +undoubtedly good and desirable in many respects; +but these gifts of nature may also become extremely +bad and mischievous if the will which +is to make use of them, and which, therefore,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</a></span> +constitutes what is called character, is not good. +It is the same with the gifts of fortune. Power, +riches, honour, even health, and the general well-being +and contentment with one's condition +which is called happiness, inspire pride and +often presumption, if there is not a good will +to correct the influence of these on the mind."</p> + +<p>"Everything in nature works according to laws. +Rational beings alone have the faculty of acting +according to the conception of laws, that is, according +to principles; <i>i.e.</i> have a will."</p> + +<p>"Consequently the only good action is that which +is done out of pure reverence for universal law. +This categorical imperative of duty is expressed +as follows: 'Act as if the maxim of thy action +were to become by thy will a Universal Law of +Nature.' And since every other rational being +must conduct himself on the same rational principle +that holds for me, I am bound to respect +him as I do myself. Hence the second practical +imperative is: 'So act as to treat humanity, +whether in thine own person or in that of any +other, in every case as an end, never as means +only.'"</p> + +<p>In Kant Stoicism reaches its climax. Law and +the will are everything: possessions, even graces +are nothing.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>IV<br /> +THE STOIC SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM OF EVIL</h4> + +<p>The problem of evil was the great problem of +the Stoic, as the problem of pleasure was the +problem of the Epicurean. To this problem the +Stoic gives substantially four answers, with all +of which we are already somewhat familiar:—</p> + +<p>First: Only that is evil which we choose to +regard as such. To quote Marcus Aurelius once +more on this fundamental point: "Consider that +everything is opinion, and opinion is in thy power. +Take away then, when thou choosest, thy opinion, +and like a mariner who has doubled the +promontory, thou wilt find calm, everything stable, +and a waveless bay." "Take away thy +opinion, and then there is taken away the complaint: +I have been harmed. Take away the +complaint: I have been harmed, and the harm +is done away."</p> + +<p>Second: Since virtue or integrity is the only +good, nothing but the loss of that can be a +real evil. When this is present, nothing of real +value can be lacking. A Stoic then says, "Virtue +suffers no vacancy in the place she inhabits; +she fills the whole soul, takes away the sensi<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</a></span>bility +of any loss, and is herself sufficient." "As +the stars hide their diminished heads before the +brightness of the sun, so pains, afflictions, and +injuries are all crushed and dissipated by the +greatness of virtue; whenever she shines, everything +but what borrows its splendour from her +disappears, and all manner of annoyances have +no more effect upon her than a shower of rain +upon the sea." "It does not matter what you +bear, but how you bear it." "Where a man +can live at all, he can live well." "I must die. +Must I then die lamenting? I must go into +exile. Does any man hinder me from going with +smiles and cheerfulness and contentment?" "Life +itself is neither good nor evil, but only a place +for good and evil." "It is the edge and temper +of the blade that make a good sword, not the +richness of the scabbard; and so it is not money +and possessions that make a man considerable, +but his virtue." "They are amusing fellows +who are proud of things which are not in our +power. A man says: I am better than you +for I possess much land, and you are wasting +with hunger. Another says: I am of consular +rank; another: I have curly hair. But a horse +does not say to a horse: I am superior to you, +for I possess much fodder and much barley,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</a></span> +and my bits are of gold, and my harness is +embroidered; but he says: I am swifter than +you. And every animal is better or worse from +his own merit or his own badness. Is there +then no virtue in man only, and must we look +to our hair, and our clothes, and to our ancestors?" +"Let our riches consist in coveting +nothing, and our peace in fearing nothing."</p> + +<p>Third: What seems evil to the individual is +good for the whole: and since we are members +of the whole is good for us. "Must my leg +be lamed?" the Stoic asks. "Wretch, do you then +on account of one poor leg find fault with the +world? Wilt thou not willingly surrender it for +the whole? Know you not how small a part +you are compared with the whole?"</p> + +<p>"If a good man had foreknowledge of what +would happen, he would coöperate toward his own +sickness and death and mutilation, since he knows +that these things are assigned to him according to +the universal arrangement, and that the whole is +superior to the part."</p> + +<p>Fourth: Trial brings out our best qualities, is +"stuff to try the soul's strength on," and "educe +the man," as Browning puts it. This interpretation +of evil as a means of bringing out the higher +moral qualities, though not peculiar to Stoicism,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</a></span> +was very congenial to their system, and appears +frequently in their writings. "Just as we must +understand when it is said that Æsculapius prescribed +to this man horse exercise, or bathing in +cold water, or going without shoes, so we must +understand it when it is said that the nature of +the universe prescribed to this man disease, or mutilation, +or loss of anything of the kind." "Calamity +is the touchstone of a brave mind, that +resolves to live and die master of itself. Adversity +is the better for us all, for it is God's mercy to +show the world their errors, and that the things +they fear and covet are neither good nor evil, +being the common and promiscuous lot of good +men and bad."</p> + + +<h4>V<br /> +THE STOIC PARADOXES</h4> + +<p>A good test of one's appreciation of the Stoic +position is whether or not one can see the measure +of truth their paradoxes contain.</p> + +<p>The first paradox is that there are no degrees in +vice. In the words of the Stoic, "The man who +is a hundred furlongs from Canopus, and the +man who is only one, are both equally not in +Canopus."</p> + +<p>One of the few bits of moral counsel which I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</a></span> +remember from the infant class in the Sunday-school +runs as follows:—</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"It is a sin<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To steal a pin:<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Much more to steal<br /></span> +<span class="i0">A greater thing."<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>This, in spite of its exquisite lyrical expression, the +Stoic would flatly deny. The theft of a pin, and +the defalcation of a bank cashier for a hundred +thousand dollars; a cross word to a dog, and a +course of conduct which breaks a woman's heart, +are from the Stoic standpoint precisely on a level. +For it is not the consequences but the form of our +action that is the important thing. It is not how +we make other people feel as a result of our act, +but how we ourselves think of it, as we propose to +do it, or after it is done, that determines its goodness +or badness. If I steal a pin, I violate the +universal law just as clearly and absolutely as +though I stole the hundred thousand dollars. I +can no more look with deliberate approval on the +cross word to a dog, than on the breaking of a +woman's heart. There are things that do not +admit of degrees. We must either fire our gun +off or not fire it. We cannot fire part of the +charge. We want either an absolutely good egg +for breakfast, or no egg at all. One that is par<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</a></span>tially +good, or on the line between goodness and +badness, we send back as altogether bad. If +there is a little round hole in a pane of glass, cut +by a bullet, we reject the whole pane as imperfect, +just as though a big jagged hole had been made +in it by a brickbat. We get an echo of this paradox +in the statement of St. James, "For whosoever +shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in +one point, he is guilty of all."</p> + +<p>This paradox becomes plain, self-evident truth, +the moment we admit the Stoic position that not +external things, and their appeal to our sensibility, +but our internal attitudes toward universal law, +are the points on which our virtue hangs. Either +we intend to obey the universal law of nature or +we do not; and between the intention of obedience +and the intention of disobedience there is no +middle ground.</p> + +<p>Second: The wise man, the Stoic sage, is absolutely +perfect, the complete master of himself, +and rightfully the ruler of the world. If everything +depends on our thought, and our thought +is in tune with the universal law, then obviously +we are perfect. Beyond such complete inner +response to the universal law it is impossible for +man to advance.</p> + +<p>Curiously enough, the religious doctrine of per<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</a></span>fectionism, +which often arises in Methodist circles, +and in such holiness movements as have taken +their rise from the influence of Methodism, shows +this same root in the conception of law. Wesley's +definition of sin is "the violation of a known +law." If that be all there is of sin, then any of us +who is ordinarily decent and conscientious, may +boast of perfection. You can number perfectionists +by tens of thousands on such abstract +terms as these. But if sin be not merely deliberate +violation of abstract law; if it be failure +to fulfil to the highest degree the infinitely delicate +personal, domestic, civic, and social relations +in which we stand; then the very notion of perfection +is preposterous, and the profession of it +little less than blasphemy. But like the modern +religious perfectionists, the Stoics had little concern +for the concrete, individual, personal ties +which bind men and women together in families, +societies, and states. Perfection was an easy +thing, because they had defined it in such abstract +terms. Still, though not by any means the whole +of virtue as deeper schools have apprehended it, +it is something to have our inner motive absolutely +right, when measured by the standard of +universal law. That at least the Stoic professed +to have attained.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</a></span></p> + +<p>Third: The Stoic is a citizen of the whole world. +Local, domestic, national ties bind him not. But +this is a cheap way of gaining universality,—this +skipping the particulars of which the universal is +composed. To be as much interested in the +politics of Rio Janeiro or Hong Kong as you are +in those of the ward of your own city does not +mean much until we know how much you are +interested in the politics of your own ward. And +in the case of the Stoic this interest was very +attenuated. As is usually the case, extension of +interest to the ends of the earth was purchased at +the cost of defective intensity close at home, where +charity ought to begin. As a matter of fact the +Stoics were very defective in their standards of +citizenship. Still, what the law of justice demanded, +that they were disposed to render to +every man; and thus, though on a very superficial +basis, the Stoics laid the broad foundation of an +international democracy which knows no limits of +colour, race, or stage of development. Though Stoicism +falls far short of the warmth and devotion of +modern Christian missions, yet the early stage of +the missionary movement, in which people were +interested, not in the concrete welfare of specific +peoples, but in vast aggregates of "souls," +represented on maps, and in diagrams, bears a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</a></span> +close resemblance to the Stoic cosmopolitanism. +We have all seen people who would give and work +to save the souls of the heathen, who would never +under any circumstances think of calling on the +neighbour on the same street who chanced to be a +little below their own social circle. The soul of a +heathen is a very abstract conception; the lowly +neighbour a very concrete affair. The Stoics are +not the only people who have deceived themselves +with vast abstractions.</p> + + +<h4>VI<br /> +THE RELIGIOUS ASPECT OF STOICISM</h4> + +<p>The Stoics had a genuine religion. The Epicureans, +too, had their gods, but they never took +them very seriously. In a world made up of +atoms accidentally grouped in transient relations, +of which countless accidental groupings I happen +to be one, there is no room for a real religious +relationship. Consequently the Epicurean, though +he amused himself with poetic pictures of gods +who led lives of undisturbed serenity, unconcerned +about the affairs of men, had no consciousness of +a great spiritual whole of which he was a part, or +of an Infinite Person to whom he was personally +related.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</a></span></p> + +<p>To the Stoic, on the contrary, the round world +is part of a single universe, which holds all its +parts in the grasp and guidance of one universal +law, determining each particular event. By making +that law of the universe his own, the individual +man at once worships the all-controlling +Providence, and achieves his own freedom. For +the law to which he yields is at once the law of the +whole universe, and the law of his own nature as a +part of the universe. "We are born subjects," +exclaims the Stoic, "but to obey God is perfect +liberty." "Everything," says Marcus Aurelius, +"harmonises with me which is harmonious to thee, +O universe. Nothing for me is too early or too +late, which is in due time for thee."</p> + +<p>A characteristic prayer and meditation and hymn +will show us, far better than description, what this +Stoic religion meant to those who devoutly held it. +Epictetus gives us this prayer of the dying Cynic: +"I stretch out my hands to God and say: The +means which I have received from thee for seeing +thy administration of the world and following it +I have not neglected: I have not dishonoured thee +by my acts: see how I have used my perceptions: +have I ever blamed thee? have I been discontented +with anything that happens or wished it to +be otherwise? Have I wished to transgress the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</a></span> +relations of things? That thou hast given me life, +I thank thee for what thou hast given: so long as +I have used the things which are thine I am content; +take them back and place them wherever +thou mayest choose; for thine were all things,—thou +gavest them to me. Is it not enough to +depart in this state of mind, and what life is better +and more becoming than that of a man who is in +this state of mind, and what end is more happy?"</p> + +<p>He also offers us this meditation on the inevitable +losses of life, by which he consoles himself +with the thought that all he has is a loan from +God, which these seeming losses but restore to their +rightful owner, who had lent them to us for a while.</p> + +<p>"Never say about anything, I have lost it; but +say, I have restored it. Is your child dead? It +has been restored. Is your wife dead? She has +been restored. Has your estate been taken from +you? Has not this been also restored? 'But he +who has taken it from me is a bad man.' But +what is it to you by whose hands the giver demanded +it back? So long as he may allow you, +take care of it as a thing which belongs to +another, as travellers do with their inn."</p> + +<p>The grandest expression of the Stoic religion, +however, is found in the hymn of Cleanthes. Elsewhere +there is too evident a disposition to con<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</a></span>descend +to use God's aid in keeping up the Stoic +temper; with little of outgoing adoration for the +greatness and glory which are in God himself. +But in this grand hymn we have genuine reverence, +devotion, worship, praise, self-surrender,—in short, +that confession of the glory of the Infinite by the +conscious weakness of the finite in which the heart +of true religion everywhere consists. Nowhere +outside of the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures +has adoration breathed itself in more exalted and +fervent strains. The hymn is addressed to Zeus, +as the Stoics freely used the names of the popular +gods to express their own deeper meanings.</p> + +<h5>HYMN TO ZEUS</h5> + +<p>"Thee it is lawful for all mortals to address. +For we are Thy offspring, and alone of living +creatures possess a voice which is the image of +reason. Therefore I will forever sing Thee and +celebrate Thy power. All this universe rolling +round the earth obeys Thee, and follows willingly +at Thy command. Such a minister hast Thou +in Thy invincible hands, the two-edged, flaming, +vivid thunderbolt. O King, most High, nothing +is done without Thee, neither in heaven or on +earth, nor in the sea, except what the wicked do +in their foolishness. Thou makest order out of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</a></span> +disorder, and what is worthless becomes precious +in Thy sight; for Thou hast fitted together good +and evil into one, and hast established one law +that exists forever. But the wicked fly from Thy +law, unhappy ones, and though they desire to +possess what is good, yet they see not, neither do +they hear the universal law of God. If they +would follow it with understanding, they might +have a good life. But they go astray, each after +his own devices,—some vainly striving after reputation, +others turning aside after gain excessively, +others after riotous living and wantonness. Nay, +but, O Zeus, Giver of all things, who dwellest in +dark clouds and rulest over the thunder, deliver +men from their foolishness. Scatter it from their +souls, and grant them to obtain wisdom, for by +wisdom Thou dost rightly govern all things; that +being honoured we may repay Thee with honour, +singing Thy works without ceasing, as it is right +for us to do. For there is no greater thing than +this, either for mortal men or for the gods, to sing +rightly the universal law."</p> + +<p>Modern literature of the nobler sort has many +a Stoic note; and we ought to be able to recognise +it in its modern as well as in its ancient +dress. The very best brief expression of the Stoic +creed is found in Henley's Lines to R. T. H. B.:<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</a></span>—</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Out of the night that covers me,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Black as the Pit from pole to pole,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">I thank whatever gods may be<br /></span> +<span class="i0">For my unconquerable soul.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"In the fell clutch of circumstance<br /></span> +<span class="i0">I have not winced nor cried aloud.<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Under the bludgeonings of chance<br /></span> +<span class="i0">My head is bloody, but unbowed.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Beyond this place of wrath and tears<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Looms but the Horror of the shade,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And yet the menace of the years<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Finds, and shall find me unafraid.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"It matters not how strait the gate,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">How charged with punishments the scroll,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">I am the master of my fate:<br /></span> +<span class="i0">I am the captain of my soul."<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>The chief modern type of Stoicism, however, is +Matthew Arnold. His great remedy for the ills +of which life is so full is stated in the concluding +lines of "The Youth of Man":—</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"While the locks are yet brown on thy head,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">While the soul still looks through thine eyes,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">While the heart still pours<br /></span> +<span class="i0">The mantling blood to thy cheek,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Sink, O youth, in thy soul!<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Yearn to the greatness of Nature;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Rally the good in the depths of thyself!"<br /></span> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</a></span></div></div> + + +<h4>VII<br /> +THE PERMANENT VALUE OF STOICISM</h4> + +<p>If now we know the two fundamental principles +of Stoicism, the indifference of external circumstance +as compared with the reaction of our own +thought upon it, and the sanctification of our +thought by self-surrender to the universal law; and +if we have learned to recognise these Stoic notes +alike in ancient and modern prose and poetry, we +are ready to discriminate between the good in it +which we wish to cherish, and the shortcomings of +the system which it is well for us to avoid.</p> + +<p>We can all reduce enormously our troubles and +vexations by bringing to bear upon them the two +Stoic formulas. Toward material things, toward +impersonal events at least, we may all with profit +put on the Stoic armour, or to use the figure of the +turtle, which is most expressive of the Stoic attitude, +we can all draw the soft sensitive flesh of our +feelings inside the hard shell of resolute thoughts. +There is a way of looking at our poverty, our +plainness of feature, our lack of mental brilliancy, +our humble social estate, our unpopularity, our +physical ailments, which, instead of making us +miserable, will make us modest, contented, cheer<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</a></span>ful, +serene. The mistakes that we make, the +foolish words we say, the unfortunate investments +into which we get drawn, the failures we experience, +all may be transformed by the Stoic formula +into spurs to greater effort and stimulus to wiser +deeds in days to come. Simply to shift the emphasis +from the dead external fact beyond our +control, to the live option which always presents +itself within; and to know that the circumstance +that can make us miserable simply does not exist, +unless it exists by our consent within our own +minds;—this is a lesson well worth spending an +hour with the Stoics to learn once for all.</p> + +<p>And the other aspect of their doctrine, its quasi-religious +side, though not by any means the last +word about religion, is a valuable first lesson in +the reality of religion. To know that the universal +law is everywhere, and that its will may in +every circumstance be done; to measure the petty +perturbations of our little lives by the vast orbits +of natural forces moving according to beneficent +and unchanging law; when we come out of the +exciting political meeting, or the roar of the stock-exchange, +to look up at the calm stars and the +tranquil skies and hear them say to us, "So hot, +my little man";—this elevation of our individual +lives by the reverent contemplation of the universe<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</a></span> +and its unswerving laws, is something which we +may all learn with profit from the old Stoic masters. +Business, house-keeping, school-teaching, professional +life, politics, society, would all be more +noble and dignified if we could bring to them every +now and then a touch of this Stoic strength and +calm.</p> + +<p>Criticism, complaint, fault-finding, malicious +scandal, unpopularity, and all the shafts of the +censorious are impotent to slay or even wound the +spirit of the Stoic. If these criticisms are true, +they are welcomed as aids in the discovery of +faults which are to be frankly faced, and strenuously +overcome. If they are false, unfounded, due +to the querulousness or jealousy of the critic rather +than to any fault of the Stoic, then he feels only +contempt for the criticisms and pity for the poor +misguided critic. The true Stoic can be the serene +husband of a scolding shrew of a wife; the complacent +representative of dissatisfied and enraged +constituents; maintain unruffled equanimity when +cut by his aristocratic acquaintances and excluded +from the most select social circles: for he carries +the only valid standard of social measurement under +his own hat, and needs not the adoration of his +wife, the cheers of his constituents, the cards and +invitations, the nods and smiles of the four hun<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</a></span>dred +to assure him of his dignity and worth. If +he is an author, it does not trouble him that his +books are unsold, unread, uncut. If the many +could appreciate him, he would have to be one of +themselves, and then there would be no use in his +trying to instruct them. His book is what the +universal law gave him to say, and decreed that it +should be; and whether there be many or few to +whom the universal law has revealed the same +truth, and granted power to appreciate it, is the +concern of the universal, not of himself, the individual +author. Again, if he is in poor health, +weary, exhausted, if each stroke of work must be +wrought in agony and pain,—that, too, is decreed +for him by those just laws which he or his ancestors +have blindly violated; and he will accept even +this dictate of the universal law as just and +good: he will not suffer these trifling incidental +pains and aches to diminish by one jot the output +of his hand or brain. When disillusion and disappointment +overtake him; when the things his +youth had sighed for finally take themselves forever +out of his reach; when he sees clearly that +only a few more years remain to him, and those +must be composed of the same monotonous round +of humdrum details, duties that have lost the +charm of novelty, functions that have long since<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</a></span> +been relegated to the unconsciousness of habit, +vexations that have been endured a thousand +times, petty pleasures that have long since lost +their zest: even then the Stoic says that this, too, +is part of the universal programme, and must be accepted +resignedly. If there is little that nature +has left to give him for which he cares, yet he can +return to her the tribute of an obedient will and a +contented mind: if he can expect little from the +world, he can contribute something to it; and so to +the last he maintains,—</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"One equal temper of heroic hearts,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield."<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>When there is hard work to be done, to which +there is no pleasure, no honour, no emolument +attached; when there are evils to be rebuked +which will bring down the wrath and vengeance +of the powers that be on him who exposes the +wrong; when there are poor relatives to be supported, +and slights to be endured, and injustice to +be borne, it is well for us all to know this Stoic +formula, and fortify our souls behind its impenetrable +walls. To consider not what happens to us, +but how we react upon it; to measure good in +terms not of sensuous pleasure, but of mental attitude; +to know that if we are for the universal law,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</a></span> +it matters not how many things may be against +us; to rest assured that there can be no circumstance +or condition in which this law cannot be +done by us, and therefore no situation of which +we cannot be more than master, through implicit +obedience to the great law that governs all,—this +is the stern consolation of Stoicism; and there are +few of us so happily situated in all respects that +there do not come to us times when such a conviction +is a defence and refuge for our souls. Beyond +and above Stoicism we shall try to climb in +later chapters. But below Stoicism one may not +suffer his life to fall, if he would escape the fearful +hells of depression, despair, and melancholia. +As we lightly send back across the centuries our +thanks to Epicurus for teaching us to prize at +their true worth health and the good things of +life, so let us reverently bow before the Stoic +sages, who taught us the secret of that hardy +virtue which bears with fortitude life's inevitable +ills.</p> + + +<h4>VIII<br /> +THE DEFECTS OF STOICISM</h4> + +<p>Why we cannot rest in Stoicism as our final +guide to life, the mere statement of their doctrine +must have made clear to every one; and in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</a></span> +calling attention to its limitations I shall only +be saying for the reader what he has been saying +to himself all through the chapter. It may be well +enough to treat things as indifferent, and work them +over into such mental combinations as best serve our +rational interests. To treat persons in that way, +however, to make them mere pawns in the game +which reason plays, is heartless, monstrous. The +affections are as essential to man as his reason. +It is a poor substitute for the warm, sweet, tender +ties that bind together husband and wife, parent +and child, friend and friend,—this freezing of +people together through their common relation +to the universal law. I suppose that is why, in +all the history of Stoicism, though college girls +usually have a period of flirting with the Stoic +melancholy of Matthew Arnold, no woman was +ever known to be a consistent and steadfast Stoic. +Indeed a Stoic woman is a contradiction in terms. +One might as well talk of a warm iceberg, or soft +granite, or sweet vinegar. Stoicism is something +of which men, unmarried or badly married men at +that, have an absolute monopoly.</p> + +<p>Again if its disregard of particulars and individuals +is cold and hard, its attempted substitute +of abstract, vague universality is a bit absurd. +Sometimes the lighter mood of caricature best<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</a></span> +brings out the weaknesses that are concealed in +grave systems when taken too seriously. Mr. W. +S. Gilbert has put the dash of absurdity there is +in the Stoic doctrines so convincingly that his +lines may serve the purpose of illustrating the +inherent weakness of the Stoic position better +than more formal criticism. They are addressed</p> + +<h5>TO THE TERRESTRIAL GLOBE</h5> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Roll on, thou ball, roll on;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Through pathless realms of space<br /></span> +<span class="i20">Roll on.<br /></span> +<span class="i0">What though I'm in a sorry case?<br /></span> +<span class="i0">What though I cannot pay my bills?<br /></span> +<span class="i0">What though I suffer toothache's ills?<br /></span> +<span class="i0">What though I swallow countless pills?<br /></span> +<span class="i16">Never you mind!<br /></span> +<span class="i20">Roll on.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Roll on, thou ball, roll on;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Through seas of inky air<br /></span> +<span class="i20">Roll on.<br /></span> +<span class="i0">It's true I've got no shirts to wear;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">It's true my butcher's bills are due;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">It's true my prospects all look blue—<br /></span> +<span class="i0">But don't let that unsettle you—<br /></span> +<span class="i16">Never you mind!<br /></span> +<span class="i20">Roll on.<br /></span> +<span class="i6">(It rolls on.)"<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>The incompleteness of the Stoic position is +precisely this tendency to slight and ignore the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</a></span> +external conditions out of which life is made. +Its God is fate. Instead of a living, loving will, +manifest in the struggle with present conditions, +Stoicism sees only an impersonal law, rigid, fixed, +fatal, unalterable, unimprovable, uncompanionable. +Man's only freedom lies in unconditional surrender +to what was long ago decreed. Of glad +and original coöperation with its beneficent designs, +thus helping to make the world happier +and better than it could have been had not the +universal will found and chosen just this individual +me, to work freely for its improvement, +Stoicism knows nothing. Its satisfaction is staked +on a dead law to be obeyed, not a live will to +be loved. Its ideal is a monotonous identity of +law-abiding agents who differ from each other +chiefly in the names by which they chance to be +designated. It has no place for the development +of rich and varied individuality in each through +intense, passionate devotion to other individuals +as widely different as age, sex, training, and temperament +can make them. Before we find the +perfect guidance of life we must look beyond +the Stoic as well as the Epicurean, to Plato, to +Aristotle, and, above all, to Jesus.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</a></span></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III"></a>CHAPTER III</h2> + +<h3>THE PLATONIC SUBORDINATION OF LOWER TO +HIGHER</h3> + + +<h4>I<br /> +THE NATURE OF VIRTUE</h4> + +<p>Epicureanism tells us how to gain pleasure; +Stoicism tells us how to bear pain. But life is +not so simple as these systems assume. It is not +merely the problem of getting all the pleasure we +can; nor of taking pain in such wise that it does not +hurt. It is a question of the worth of the things +in which we find our pleasure, and the relative +values of the things we suffer for. Plato squarely +attacks that larger problem. He says that the +Epicurean is like a musician who tunes his violin +as much as he can without breaking the strings. +The wise musician, on the contrary, recognises +that the tuning is merely incidental to the music; +and that when you have tuned it up to a certain +point, it is worse than useless to go on tuning it +any more. Just as the tuning is for the sake of +the music, and when you have reached a point<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</a></span> +where the instrument gives perfect music, you +must stop the tuning and begin to play; so +when you have brought any particular pleasure, +say that of eating, up to a certain point, you +must stop eating, and begin to live the life for +the sake of which you eat. To the Stoic Plato +gives a similar answer. The Stoic, he says, is +like a physician who gives his patient all the +medicine he can, and prides himself on being a +better physician than others because he gives his +patients bigger doses, and more of them. The +wise physician gives medicine up to a certain +point, and then stops. That point is determined +by the health, which the medicine is given to +promote. Precisely so, it is foolish to bear all +the pain we can, and boast ourselves of our ability +to swallow big doses of tribulation and pronounce +it good. The wise man will bear pain up to a +certain point; and when he reaches that limit, he +will stop. What is the point? Where is the +limit? Virtue is the point up to which the bearing +of pain is good, the limit beyond which the +bearing of pain becomes an evil. Virtue, then, +is the supreme good, and makes everything that +furthers it, whether pleasurable or painful, good. +Virtue makes everything that hinders it, whether +pleasurable or painful, bad. What, then, is virtue?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[Pg 112]</a></span> +In what does this priceless pearl consist? We +have our two analogies. Virtue is to pleasure +what the music is to the tuning of the instrument. +Just as the perfection of the music proves the +excellence of the tuning, so the perfection of +virtue justifies the particular pleasures we enjoy. +Virtue stands related to the endurance of pain, +as health stands related to the taking of medicine. +The perfection of health proves that, however +distasteful the medicine may be, it is nevertheless +good; and any imperfection of health that +may result from either too much or too little +medicine shows that in the quantity taken the +medicine was bad for us. Precisely so pain is +good for us up to the point where virtue requires +it. Below or above that point, pain becomes an +evil.</p> + +<p>Plato spared no pains to disentangle the question +of virtue from its complications with rewards and +penalties, pleasures and pains. As the virtue of a +violin is not in its carving or polish, but in the +music it produces; as the virtue of medicine is not +in its sweetness or its absence of bitterness, so the +virtue of man has primarily nothing to do with +rewards and penalties, pleasures or pains. In our +study of virtue, he says, we must strip it naked of +all rewards, honours, and emoluments; indeed we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</a></span> +must go farther and even dress it up in the outer +habiliments of vice; we must make the virtuous +man poor, persecuted, forsaken, unpopular, distrusted, +reviled, and condemned. Then we may +be able to see what there is in virtue which, in +every conceivable circumstance, makes it superior +to vice. He makes one of his characters in the +Republic complain that: "No one has ever adequately +described either in verse or prose the +true essential nature of either righteousness or +unrighteousness immanent in the soul, and invisible +to any human or divine eye; or shown that of +all the things of a man's soul which he has within +him, righteousness is the greatest good, and unrighteousness +the greatest evil. Therefore I say, +not only prove to us that righteousness is better +than unrighteousness, but show what either of +them do to the possessors of them, which makes +the one to be good and the other evil, whether +seen or unseen by gods and men." Accordingly +he attributes to the unrighteous man skill to win +a reputation for righteousness, even while acting +most unrighteously. He clothes him with power +and glory, and fame, and family, and influence; +fills his life with delights; surrounds him with +friends; cushions him in ease and security. Over +against this man who is really unrighteous, but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</a></span> +has all the advantages that come from being +supposed to be righteous, he sets the man who is +really righteous, and clothes him with all the disabilities +which come from being supposed to be +unrighteous. "Let him be scourged and racked; +let him have his eyes burnt out, and finally, after +suffering every kind of evil, let him be impaled." +Then, says Plato, when both have reached the uttermost +extreme, the one of righteousness treated +shamefully and cruelly, the other of unrighteousness +treated honourably and obsequiously, let judgment +be given which of them is the happier of the +two. Translating the language of the "Gorgias" +and the "Republic" into modern equivalents: Who +would we rather be, a man who by successful +manipulation of dishonest financial schemes had +come to be a millionnaire, the mayor of his city, +the pillar of the church, the ornament of the best +society, the Senator from his state, or the Ambassador +of his country at a European Court; or a +man who in consequence of his integrity had won +the enmity of evil men in power, and been sent in +disgrace to State prison; a man whom no one +would speak to; whom his best friends had deserted, +whose own children were being brought up +to reproach him? Which of the two men would +we rather be? And we must not introduce any<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</a></span> +consideration of reversals hereafter. Supposing +that death ends all, and that there is no God to +reverse the decisions of men; suppose these two +men were to die as they lived, without hope of +resurrection; which of the two would we rather +be for the next forty years of our lives, assuming +that after that there is nothing?</p> + +<p>Plato in a myth puts the case even more +strongly than this. Gyges, a shepherd and servant +of the king of Lydia, found a gold ring which +had the remarkable property of making its wearer +visible when he turned the collet one way, and invisible +when he turned it the other way. Being +astonished at this, he made several trials of the +ring, always with the same result; when he turned +the collet inwards he became invisible, when outwards +he reappeared. Perceiving this he immediately +contrived to be chosen messenger to the +court, where he no sooner arrived than he seduced +the queen, and with her help conspired against +the king and slew him, and took the kingdom. +Plato asks us what we should do if we had such a +ring. We could do anything we pleased and no +one would be the wiser. We could become invisible, +out of the reach of external consequences, the +instant our deed was done. Would we, with such +a ring on our finger, stand fast in righteousness?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</a></span> +Could we trust ourselves to wear that ring night +and day? Would we feel safe if we knew that +our next-door neighbour, even our most intimate +friend, had such a ring, and could do just what +he pleased to us, and yet never get caught? +Can we tell why a man with such a ring on his +finger should not do any unjust, unkind, impure, +or dishonourable deed?</p> + + +<h4>II<br /> +RIGHTEOUSNESS WRIT LARGE</h4> + +<p>The Republic is Plato's answer to this question. +Why, you may ask, should he give us a treatise on +politics in answer to a question of personal character? +Because the state is simply the individual +writ large, and as we can read large letters more +easily than small letters, we shall get at the principle +of righteousness more readily if we first consider +what it is in the large letters of the state. +In presenting this analogy of the state I shall +freely translate Plato's teachings into their modern +equivalent. What, then, is the difference between +a righteous and unrighteous state?</p> + +<p>An unrighteous state is one in which the working-men +in each industry are organised into a +union which uses its power to force the wages of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</a></span> +its members up to an exorbitant level, and uses +intimidation and violence to prevent any one else +from working for less or producing more than the +standards fixed by the union; it is a state in +which the owners of capital, in each line of industry, +combine into overcapitalised trusts for the +purpose of making the small sums which they +put into the business, and the larger sums which +they do not put in at all, except on paper, +earn exorbitant dividends at the expense of the +public; it is a state in which the politicians are in +politics for their pockets, using the opportunities +for advantageous contracts which offices afford, +and the opportunities for legislation in favour of +private schemes, to enrich themselves out of the +public purse; it is a state in which the police intimidate +the other citizens, and sell permission to +commit crime to the highest bidder; it is a state in +which the scholars concern themselves exclusively +about their own special and technical interests, and +as long as the institutions with which they are connected +are supported by the gifts of rich men, +care little how the poor are oppressed and the +many are made to suffer by the corrupt use of +wealth and the selfish misuse of power. Such is +the unrighteous state. And wherein does its unrighteousness +consist? Obviously in the fact that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</a></span> +each of the great classes in the state—working-men, +capitalists, police, politicians, scholars—are +living exclusively for themselves and are ready +to sacrifice the interests of the community as a +whole to their private interests. Now a state +which should be completely unrighteous, in which +everybody should succeed in carrying out his own +selfish interests at the expense of everybody else, +would be intolerable. United action would be +impossible. No one would wish to live in such +a state. There must be honour even among +thieves; otherwise stealing could not be successful +on any considerable scale. The trouble with it +is that each part is arrayed in antagonism against +every other part, and the whole is sacrificed to +the supposed interests of its constituent members.</p> + +<p>What, then, in contrast to this would be a +righteous state? It would be a state in which +each of these classes fulfils its part well, with a +view to the good of the whole. It would be +a state where labour would be organised into +unions, which would not insist on having the +greatest possible wages for the least possible +work, but which would maintain a high standard +of efficiency, and intelligence, and character in +the members, with a view to doing the best possible +work in their trade, at such wages as the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</a></span> +resources and needs of the community, as indicated +by the normal action of demand and supply, +would warrant. It would be a state in which the +capitalists would organise their business in such +a way that they might invite public inspection of +the relation between the capital, enterprise, skill, +economy, and industry expended, and the prices +they charge for commodities furnished and services +rendered. It would be a state in which the police +would maintain that order and law which is the +equal interest of the rich and poor alike. It would +be a state in which the men in political offices +would use their official positions and influence for +the protection of the lives and promotion of the +interests of the whole people whom they represent +and profess to serve. It would be a state in which +the colleges and universities would be intensely +alive to economic, social, and public questions, and +devote their learning to the maintenance of healthful +material conditions, just distribution of wealth, +sound morals, and wise determination of public +policy.</p> + +<p>Wherein, then, does the difference between an +unrighteous and a righteous state consist? Simply +in this—that in the unrighteous state each class +in the community is playing for its own hand and +regarding the community as a mere means to its<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</a></span> +own selfish interests as the supreme end,—while +a righteous state on the contrary is one in which +each class in the community is doing its own +work as economically and efficiently as possible, +with a view to the interests of the community as +a whole. In the unrighteous state the whole is +subordinated to each separate part; in the righteous +state each part is subordinated to the common +interests of the whole. If, then, we ask as +did Adeimantus in the Republic, "Where, then, +is righteousness, and in which particular part of +the state is it to be found," our answer will be +that given by Socrates, "that each individual +man shall be put to that use for which nature +designs him, and every man will do his own +business so that the whole city will be not many +but one." Righteousness, then, in the state +consists in having each class mind its own +business with a view to the good of the whole. +On this, which is Plato's fundamental principle, +we can all agree.</p> + +<p>As to the method by which the righteous state +is to be brought about probably we should all profoundly +differ from him. His method for securing +the subordination of what he calls the lower +class of society to what he calls the higher class +is that of repression, force, and fraud. The obe<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</a></span>dience +of the working-men is to be secured by +intimidation; the devotion of the higher classes +is to be secured partly by suppression of natural +instincts and interests, partly by an elaborate and +prolonged education. The rulers are to have no +property and no wives and families that they can +call their own. He attempts to get devotion to +the whole by suppressing those more individual +and special forms of devotion which spring from +private property and family affection. In all +these details of his scheme we must frankly recognise +that Plato was profoundly wrong. The +working classes cannot and ought not to be +driven like dumb cattle to their tasks by a force +external to themselves. The ruling class, the +scholars and statesmen, can never be successfully +trained for disinterested public life by taking +away from them those fundamental interests and +affections out of which, in the long run, all public +spirit takes its rise and draws its inspiration. In +opposition to this communism based on repression +and suppression by force and fraud, the modern +democracy sets a community of interest and a +devotion of personal resources, be they great or +small, to the common good on the part of every +citizen of every class. The utter inadequacy and +impracticability of the details of Plato's commu<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</a></span>nistic +schemes about the wives and property of his +ruling class should not blind us to the profound +truth of his essential definition of righteousness +in a state: That each class shall "do the work +for which they draw the wage" with a view to +the effect it will have, not on themselves alone, +but primarily on the welfare of the whole state, +of which each class is a serving and contributing +member. This essential truth of Plato our modern +democracy has taken up. The difference is +that, while Plato proposed to have intelligence and +authority in one, and obedience and manual +labour in another class, the problem of modern +democracy is to give an intelligent and public-spirited +outlook to the working-man, and a +spirit of honest work to the scholar and the +statesman.</p> + +<p>The defect of Plato lies in the external arrangements +by which he proposed to secure the right +relation of parts to the whole. His measures for +securing this subordination were partly material +and physical, partly visionary and unnatural, +where ours must be natural, social, intellectual, +and spiritual. But he did lay down for all time +the great principle that the due subordination of +the parts to the whole, of the members to the +organism, of the classes to society, of individuals<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[Pg 123]</a></span> +to the state is the essence of righteousness in a +state, and an indispensable condition of political +well-being.</p> + + +<h4>III<br /> +THE CARDINAL VIRTUES</h4> + +<p>Righteousness in a state then consists in each +class minding its own business, and performing its +specific function for the good of the state as a +whole. Righteousness in the individual is precisely +the same thing. There are three grand departments +of each man's life: his appetites, his +spirit, and his reason. Neither of these is good +or bad in itself. Neither of them should be permitted +to set up housekeeping on its own account. +Any one of them is bad if it acts for itself alone, +regardless of the interests of the self as a whole. +Let us take up these departments in order, and +see wherein the vice and the virtue of each consists. +First the appetites, which in the individual +correspond to the working class in the state.</p> + +<p>Let us take eating as a specimen, remembering, +however, that everything we say about the appetite +for food is equally true of all the other elementary +appetites, such as those that deal with +drink, sex, dress, property, amusement, and the +like. The Epicurean said they are all good if<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</a></span> +they do not clash and contradict each other. The +Stoic implied that they are all, if not positively +bad, at least so low and unimportant that the wise +man will not pay much attention to them. Plato +says they are all good in their place, and that they +are all bad out of their place. What, then, is their +place? It is one of subordination and service to +the self as a whole. Which is the better breakfast: +a half pound of beefsteak, with fried potatoes, +an omelette, some griddle cakes and +maple syrup, with a doughnut or two, and a generous +piece of mince pie? or a little fruit and a +cereal, a roll, and a couple of eggs?</p> + +<p>Intrinsically the first breakfast is, if anything, +better than the second. There is more of it. It +offers greater variety. It takes longer to eat it. +It will stay by you longer. If you are at a hotel +conducted on the American plan, you are getting +more for your money.</p> + +<p>Righteousness, however, is concerned with none +of these considerations. What makes one breakfast +better than the other is the way it fits into +one's life as a whole. Which breakfast will enable +you to do the best forenoon's work? Which +one will give you acute headache and chronic +dyspepsia? Immediate appetite cannot answer +these questions. Reason is the only one of our<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[Pg 125]</a></span> +three departments that can tell us what is good +for the self as a whole. Now for most people +in ordinary circumstances, reason prescribes the +second breakfast, or something like it. The second +breakfast fits into one's permanent plan of +life. The work to be done in the forenoon, the +feelings one will have in the afternoon, the general +efficiency which we desire to maintain from day +to day and year to year, all point to the second +breakfast as the more adapted to promote the +welfare of the self as a whole throughout the +entire life history. If we eat the first breakfast, +appetite rules and reason is thrust into subjection. +The lower has conquered the higher; the part has +domineered the whole. To eat such a breakfast, +for ninety-nine men out of every hundred, would +be gluttony. Yet, though eating it is vicious, the +fault is not in the breakfast, not in the hunger for +it; but in the fact that the appetite had its own +way, regardless of the permanent interests of the +self as a whole; and that so far forth reason was +dethroned, and appetite set up as ruler in its +place. Indeed there are circumstances in which +the first breakfast would be the right one to +choose. If one were on the borders of civilisation, +setting out for a long tramp through the wilderness, +where every ounce of food must be carried<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</a></span> +on his back, and no more fresh meat and home cooking +could be expected for several days, even reason +herself might prescribe the first breakfast as +more beneficial to the whole man than the second. +Precisely the same breakfast which is good in one +set of circumstances becomes bad in another. +The raw appetite of hunger is obviously neither +good nor bad. The rule of appetite over reason +and the whole self, however, is bad always, everywhere, +and for everybody. It is in this rising up +of the lower part of the self against the higher, +and its sacrifice of the self as a whole to a particular +gratification that all vice consists.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, the rule of reason over appetite, +the gratification or the restraint of appetite +according as the interests of the total self require, +is always and everywhere and for everybody good. +This is the essence of virtue; and the particular +form of virtue that results from this control of +the appetites by reason in the interest of the permanent +and total self is temperance—the first and +most fundamental of Plato's cardinal virtues.</p> + +<p>The second element of human nature, spirit, +must be dealt with in the same way. By spirit +Plato means the fighting element in us, that which +prompts us to defend ourselves, the faculty of +indignation, anger, and vengeance. To make it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</a></span> +concrete, let us take a case. Suppose the cook +in our kitchen has times of being careless, cross, +saucy, wilful, and disobedient. The spirit within +prompts us to upbraid her, quarrel with her, and +when she grows in turn more insolent and impertinent, +to discharge her. Is such an exercise +of spirit a virtuous act? It may be virtuous, or it +may be vicious. In this element, considered in +itself, there is no more virtue or vice than in appetite +considered in itself. It is again a question of +how this particular act of this particular side of +our nature stands related to the self as a whole. +What does reason say?</p> + +<p>If I send this cook away, shall I be a long +while without any; and after much vexation +probably put up with another not half so good? +Will my household be thrown into confusion? +Will hospitality be made impossible? Will the +working power of the members of my household +be impaired by lack of well-prepared, promptly +served food? In the present state of this servant +problem, all these things and worse are quite +likely to happen. Consequently reason declares +in unmistakable terms that the interests of the +self as a whole demand the retention of the cook. +But it galls and frets our spirit to keep this impertinent, +disobedient servant, and hear her irritating<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</a></span> +words, and see her aggravating behaviour. Never +mind, reason says to the spirited element in us. +The spirit is not put into us in order that it may +have a good time all by itself on its own account. +It is put into us to protect and promote the interests +of the self as a whole. You must bear patiently +with the incidental failings of your cook, +and return soft answers to her harsh words; because +in that way you will best serve that whole +self which your spirit is given you to defend. In +ninety-nine cases out of a hundred a quarrel with +a cook, on such grounds, in present conditions, +would be prejudicial to the interests of the self as +a whole. It is the sacrifice of the whole to the +part; which as we saw in the case of appetite is +the essence of all vice. Only in this case the vice +would be, not intemperance, but cowardice, inability +to bear a transient, trifling pain patiently and +bravely for the sake of the self as a whole.</p> + +<p>Still, there might be aggravated cases in which +the sharp reproof, the quarrel, and the prompt +discharge might be the brave and right thing to +do. If one felt it a contribution one was required +to make to the whole servant problem, and after +considering all the inconvenience it would cost, +still felt that life as a whole was worth more with +this particular servant out of the house than in it,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[Pg 129]</a></span> +then precisely the same act, which ordinarily +would be wrong, in this exceptional case would be +right. It is not what you do, but how you do it, +that determines whether an outburst of anger is +virtuous or vicious. If the whole self is in it, if all +interests have been fully weighed by the reason, if, +in short, you are all there when you do it, then +the act is a virtuous act, and the special name of +this virtue of the spirit is courage or fortitude. +Anger and indignation going off on its own +account is always vicious. Anger and indignation +properly controlled by reason in the interest of the +total self is always good. Precisely the same outward +act done by one man in one set of circumstances +is bad, and shows the man to be vicious, +cowardly, and weak; while, if done by another +man in other circumstances, it shows him to be +strong, brave, and manly. Virtue and vice are +questions of the subordination or insubordination +of the lower to the higher elements of our nature; +of the parts of our selves to the whole. The +subordination of appetite to reason has given us +the first of the four virtues. The subordination of +spirit to reason has given us fortitude, the second.</p> + +<p>Wisdom, the third of Plato's cardinal virtues, +consists in the supremacy of reason over spirit +and appetite; just as temperance and courage<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[Pg 130]</a></span> +consisted in the subordination of appetite and +spirit to reason. Wisdom, then, is much the same +thing as temperance and courage, only in more +positive and comprehensive form. Wisdom is the +vision of the good, the true end of man, for the +sake of which the lower elements must be subordinated. +What, then, is the good, according to +Plato? The good is the principle of order, proportion, +and harmony that binds the many parts +of an object into the effective unity of an organic +whole. The good of a watch is that perfect working +together of all its springs and wheels and +hands, which makes it keep time. The good of a +thing is the thing's proper and distinctive function; +and the condition of its performing its function is +the subordination of its parts to the interest of +the whole.</p> + +<p>The good of a horse is strength and speed; +but this in turn involves the coördination of its +parts in graceful, free movement. The good of +a state is the coöperation of all its citizens, according +to their several capacities, for the happiness +and welfare of the whole community. Wisdom +in the statesman is the power to see such an +ideal relation of the citizens to each other, and +the means by which it can be attained and conserved. +The good of the individual man, likewise,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</a></span> +is the harmonious working together of all the +elements in him, so as to produce a satisfactory +life; and wisdom is the vision of such a truly +satisfactory life, and of the conditions of its attainment. +Since man lives in a world full of natural +objects, and of works of art; since he is surrounded +by other men and is a member of a state; and +since his welfare depends on his fulfilling his +relations to these objects and persons, it follows +that wisdom to see his own true good will involve +a knowledge of these objects, persons, and institutions +around him. Hence rather more than half +the Republic is occupied with the problem of +education; or the training of men in that wisdom +which consists in the knowledge of the good.</p> + + +<h4>IV<br /> +PLATO'S SCHEME OF EDUCATION</h4> + +<p>Education, therefore, in Plato's ideal Republic, +was a lifelong affair, and from first to last practical. +For the guardians, the men who were to +be rulers or, as we should say, leaders of their +fellows, he prescribed the following course: From +early childhood until the age of seventeen,—that +is, through our elementary and high school periods,—he +would give chief attention to what he calls<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</a></span> +music; that is, to literature, music, and the plastic +arts, with popular descriptive science, or, as we +call it nowadays, nature study. This, with elementary +mathematics and gymnastics as incidental, +constituted the curriculum for the first ten +or twelve years. The chief stress through all +these years he lays on good literature,—good +both in substance and in form; for children at this +age are intensely imitative. Plato practically +anticipated the latest results of child study, which +tell us that the child builds up the whole substance +of his conception of himself out of materials +borrowed from others and incorporated in himself +by imitative reproduction; and then in turn interprets +and understands others only in so far as he +can eject this borrowed material into other persons. +Hence Plato says it is of supreme importance that +the children shall learn to admire and love good +literature. That teachers should be able to teach +the children to read and write and cipher and +draw he would take for granted. The prime +qualification, however, would be the ability to so +interpret the best literature as to make the children +admire and imitate and incorporate the noble +qualities this literature embodies. Into the literature +thus inspiringly taught in the school, only +that which praised noble deeds in noble language<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[Pg 133]</a></span> +should be admitted. Plato's description of good +literature for schools will bear repeating: "Any +deeds of endurance which are acted or told by +famous men, these the children ought to see and +hear. If they imitate at all, they should imitate +the temperate, holy, free, courageous, and the +like; but they should not depict or be able to +imitate any kind of illiberality or other baseness, +lest from imitation they come to be what they +imitate. Did you never observe how imitations, +beginning in early youth, at last sink into the +constitution and become a second nature of body, +voice, and mind?" "Of the harmonies I know +nothing, but I want to have one warlike, which +will sound the word or note which a brave man +utters in the hour of danger and stern resolve, +or when his cause is failing and he is going to +wounds or death or is overtaken by some other +evil, and at every such crisis meets fortune with +calmness and endurance; and another which may +be used by him in times of peace and freedom of +action, when there is no pressure of necessity—expressive +of entreaty, or persuasion, or prayer +to God, or instruction of man, or again of willingness +to listen to persuasion or entreaty or advice; +and which represents him when he has accomplished +his aim, not carried away by success, but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</a></span> +acting moderately and wisely, and acquiescing in +the event. These two harmonies I ask you to +leave: the strain of necessity and the strain of freedom, +the strain of courage, and the strain of temperance. +We would not have our guardians grow +up amid images of moral deformity, as in some +noxious pasture, and there browse and feed upon +many a baneful herb and flower day by day, little +by little, until they silently gather a festering mass +of corruption in their own souls. Let our artists +rather be those who are gifted to discern the true +nature of beauty and grace; then will our youth +dwell in a land of health, amid fair sights and +sounds; and beauty, the effluence of fair works, +will meet the sense like a breeze, and insensibly +draw the soul, even in childhood, into harmony +with the beauty of reason. Rhythm and harmony +find their way into the secret places of the soul, +on which they mightily fasten, bearing grace in +their movements, and making the soul graceful +of him who is rightly educated, or ungraceful if +ill educated; and also because he who has received +this true education of the inner being will most +shrewdly perceive omissions or faults in art or +nature, and with a true taste, while he praises +and rejoices over and receives into his soul the +good, and becomes noble and good, he will justly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</a></span> +blame and hate the bad, now in the days of his +youth, even before he is able to know the reason +of the thing; and when reason comes, he will +recognise and salute her as a friend with whom +his education has made him long familiar."</p> + +<p>Thus, according to Plato, the important thing +for a youth to secure by the time he is seventeen +is the admiration of noble deeds, and noble words, +and noble character. The love of good literature +is the backbone of this elementary education. +Manual training and nature study, as a means to +the appreciation of beautiful works of art and +beautiful objects in nature, he would also approve. +On the whole Plato is an advocate of those very +reforms which are now being introduced into the +elementary and secondary schools in the name of +the New Education. What one loves is of more +importance than what one knows; what one wants +to do, and is interested in trying to do, is of more +consequence at this stage than what one has done. +Early education should be an introduction to the +true, the beautiful, and the good in the form of +great men, brave deeds, beautiful objects, and +beneficent laws. The development of taste is +more than the acquisition of information; the inspiration +of literature, history, art, and descriptive +science is far more valuable than drill beyond<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</a></span> +the essentials in grammar, geography, and arithmetic.</p> + +<p>Plato's programme for the years from seventeen +to twenty, three of our four college years, is even +more startling and heretical; and quite in line +with certain tendencies in our own day. He +would set apart the three years from seventeen to +twenty for gymnastic exercises, including in such +exercises, however, military drill. Plato appreciated +both the advantage and disadvantage of +intense athletic exercises. "The period, whether +of two or three years, which passes in this sort of +training is useless for any other purpose,—for +sleep and exercise are unpropitious to learning; +and the trial is one of the most important tests to +which they are subjected."</p> + +<p>At the age of twenty he would select the most +promising youths and give them a ten years' course +in severe study of science. This systematic study +corresponds to the graduate and professional period +in modern education, only he extends it over ten +years, where we confine it to three or four. Again +at thirty there is another selection of those who +are most steadfast in their learning and most faithful +in their military and public duties, and these +are given a five years' course in dialectic or philosophy. +They are trained to see the relation of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</a></span> +the special sciences to each other and how each +department of truth is related to the whole. At +the age of thirty-five they must be appointed to +military and other offices. "In this way they +will get their experience of life, and there will +be an opportunity to try whether, when they are +drawn all manner of ways by temptation, they +will stand firm or stir at all." And when they have +reached the age of fifty, after fifteen years of this +laboratory work in actual public service, holding +subordinate offices and learning to discriminate +good and evil, not as we find them done up in packages +and labelled in the study, but as they are +interwoven in the complicated texture of real life, +"those who still survive and have distinguished +themselves in every deed and in all knowledge, +come at last to their graduation; the time has now +arrived at which they must raise the eye of the +soul to the universal light which lightens all things +and behold the absolute good; for that is the +pattern according to which they are to order the +state and the lives of individuals and the remainder +of their own lives also, making philosophy their +chief pursuit; but when their turn comes, also +toiling at politics and ruling for the public good."</p> + +<p>The wisdom which comes of this prolonged and +elaborate education is the third of Plato's four<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</a></span> +cardinal virtues. In the state it is the ruling +principle, and its agents are the philosophers. As +Plato says in a famous passage: "Until then +philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of +this world have the spirit and power of philosophy, +and political greatness and wisdom meet in one, +and those commoner natures who follow either to +the exclusion of the other are compelled to stand +aside, cities will never cease from ill,—no, nor +the human race, as I believe,—and then only will +this our state have a possibility of life and behold +the light of day." Precisely so, no individual will +attain his true estate until this philosophic principle, +which sees the good, through training +has been so developed that it can bring both +appetite and spirit into subjection to it, as a +charioteer controls his headstrong horses.</p> + + +<h4>V<br /> +RIGHTEOUSNESS THE COMPREHENSIVE VIRTUE</h4> + +<p>We now have three of the cardinal virtues: +temperance, the subjection of appetite to reason; +fortitude, the control of the spirit by reason; and +wisdom, won through education, the assertion of +the dictates of reason over the clamour of both +appetite and spirit. But where, amid all this,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</a></span> +Plato asks, is righteousness? In reply he remarks, +"that when we first began our inquiry, +ages ago, there lay righteousness rolling at our +feet, and we, fools that we were, failed to see her, +like people who go about looking for what they +have in their hands. Righteousness is the comprehensive +aspect of the three virtues already considered +in detail. It is the ultimate cause and +condition of the existence of all of them. Righteousness +in a state consists in each citizen doing +the thing to which his nature is most perfectly +adapted: in minding one's own business, in other +words, with a view to the good of the whole. +Righteousness in an individual, then, consists in +having each part of one's nature devoted to its +specific function: in having the appetites obey, +in having the spirit steadfast in difficulty and +danger, and in having the reason rule supreme. +Thus righteousness, that subordination and coordination +of all the parts of the soul in the +service of the soul as a whole, includes each of the +other three virtues and comprehends them all in +the unity of the soul's organic life.</p> + +<p>"For the righteous man does not permit the several +elements within him to meddle with one another, +but he sets in order his own inner life, and is his +own master, and at peace with himself; when he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</a></span> +has bound together the three principles within +him, and is no longer many, but has become +one entirely temperate and perfectly adjusted +nature, then he will begin to act, if he has to act, +whether in a matter of property, or in the treatment +of the body, or in some affairs of politics or +of private business; in all which cases he will +think and call just and good action, that which +preserves and coöperates with this condition, and +the knowledge which presides over this wisdom."</p> + +<p>Unrighteousness, on the other hand, is the exact +opposite of this. "Then assuming the threefold +division of the soul, must not unrighteousness +be a kind of quarrel between these three—a +meddlesomeness and interference, a rising up of a +part of the soul against the whole soul, an assertion +of unlawful authority, which is made by a rebellious +subject against a true prince, of whom he is the +natural vassal—this is the sort of thing; the confusion +and error of these parts or elements in +unrighteousness and intemperance, cowardice, and +ignorance, and in general all vice." In other +words, righteousness and unrighteousness "are +like disease and health; being in the soul just +what disease and health are in the body." "Then +virtue is the health and beauty and well-being of +the soul, vice is the disease and weakness and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</a></span> +deformity of the soul." From this point of view +our old question of the comparative advantage of +righteousness and unrighteousness answers itself. +Indeed, the question whether it is more profitable +to be righteous and do righteously and practice +virtue, whether seen or unseen of gods and men, +or to be unrighteous and act unrighteously if only +unpunished, becomes, Plato says, ridiculous. "If +when the bodily constitution is gone, life is no +longer endurable, though pampered with every +sort of meats and drinks, and having all wealth +and all power, shall we be told that life is worth +having when the very essence of the vital principle +is undermined and corrupted, even though a man +be allowed to do whatever he pleases, if at the +same time he is forbidden to escape from vice and +unrighteousness, or attain righteousness and virtue, +seeing that we now know the true nature of each?"</p> + +<p>Righteousness, according to Plato, is the condition +of the soul's health and life. To part with +righteousness for any external advantage is to commit +the supreme folly of selling our own souls. +Righteousness is the organising principle of the +soul; unrighteousness is the disorganising principle. +Health and life rest on organisation. Disorganisation +and vice are synonymous with disease and +death. Therefore, all seeming gains that one may<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</a></span> +win in the paths of unrighteousness really involve +the greatest possible loss.</p> + +<p>We have now seen what righteousness is, +whether in a state or in an individual. It is the +health, harmony, beauty, excellence of the whole +state or the whole man, secured by having each +member attend strictly to its own distinctive work, +with a view to the good of the whole state or +the whole man. Thus defined it is something +so obviously desirable and essential, that nothing +else is worthy to be compared with it. Whoever +parts with it even in exchange for the greatest +outward honours, emoluments, comforts, or pleasures, +is bound to get the worst of the bargain. +Yet men do part with it; states do part with it. +And the eighth and ninth books of the Republic +are devoted to a description of the four stages of +degeneration through which states and individuals +pass on the downward road from righteousness +and virtue to unrighteousness and vice. The +breaking up of a thing often reveals its nature +as effectually as the putting it together; and as +we have traced the four virtues by which either +the state or the soul is constructed, it will throw +added light upon the problem to trace in conclusion +the four stages through which men and +states go down to destruction.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[Pg 143]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>VI<br /> +THE STAGES OF DEGENERATION</h4> + +<p>The first step down is where, instead of the +good, men seek personal honour and distinction. +At first the deterioration, whether in state or +individual, is hardly noticeable. An ambitious +statesman, on the whole, will advocate, if he is +shrewd and far-sighted, much the same measures +as the statesman who is intent on the welfare of +the state. For he knows that by promoting the +public welfare he will most effectively gain the +reputation and distinction he desires. Yet there +is a marked difference in the attitude of mind, +and in the long run that difference will express +itself in action. When it comes to a close and +hard decision, where the real interest of the state +lies in one direction, and the waves of popular +enthusiasm are running in an opposite direction, +the man who cares for the real welfare of the +state will stand fast, while the man who cares +supremely for honour and distinction will be more +likely to give way. Besides, contention and strife +will arise, since the ambitious man is more anxious +to do something himself than he is to have the +best thing done by some one else. Hence the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">[Pg 144]</a></span> +state where the statesmen love power, office, and +honour will be less well off than the state where +they are disinterestedly devoted to the public +good.</p> + +<p>Just so the man who is supremely covetous of +power and honour will be weaker than the man +who loves the good and follows the guidance of +reason as supreme, in both these respects. He +will be prone to follow the clamour of the multitude +when he knows it is not the voice of reason; +and he will try to have his own way, even when +he knows that the way of another man is better +than his. As Plato says, "He gives up the kingdom +that is within him to the middle principle +of contentiousness and passion, and becomes +proud and ambitious." Here, then, are the two +tests by which each man may judge for himself +whether he is a degenerate of the first grade or +not. First: Will you do what reason shows you +to be right every time, at all costs, no matter if +all the honours and emoluments are attached to +doing something a shade or two off from this +absolutely right and reasonable course? Second: +Would you rather have what is best done by +somebody else, and let him have the credit of it, +rather than get all the credit yourself by doing +something not quite so good? The man of pride<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">[Pg 145]</a></span> +and ambition can never be quite disinterested in +his service of the good, although incidentally most +of the things he does will be good things. As +Plato puts it, "He is not single-minded toward +virtue, having lost his best guardian." He has +neglected "the one thing that can preserve a +man's goodness through his life—reason blended +with music."</p> + +<p>It is a short and easy step, in state and individual, +from the love of honour down to the love +of money as the guiding principle of life. The +appetitive side of life is always present, even in +the most upright of men. It may be asleep, but +it is never dead. And when there is nothing +more deep and vital than the love of honour to +hold it in restraint, it is sure to wake up and +prowl about. Rivalry for honour soon reveals the +fact that directly or indirectly honour and office +can be bought. Then comes the state of things +where only rich men can get office, or can afford +to hold it if it comes to them. That in the state +is what Plato calls an oligarchy. The deterioration +of a state under this condition is very rapid, +for, as he says, "When riches and virtue are +placed together in the scales of the balance, the +one always rises as the other falls. And so at +last, instead of loving contention and glory, men<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">[Pg 146]</a></span> +become lovers of trade and of money, and they +honour and reverence the rich man and make a +ruler of him, and dishonour the poor man." The +evils of this oligarchical rule, he says, are illustrated +by considering the nature of the qualification +for office and influence. "Just think what would +happen if the pilots were to be chosen according +to their property, and a poor man refused permission +to steer, even though he were the better +pilot?" The other defect is "the inevitable division; +such a state is not one but two states, the +one of poor men, the other of rich men, who are +living on the same spot and ever conspiring +against one another."</p> + +<p>The avaricious man is like the state which is +governed by rich men. "Is not this man likely +to seat the concupiscent and covetous elements +on the vacant throne? And when he has made +the reasoning and passionate faculties sit on the +ground obediently on either side, and taught them +to know their place, he compels the one to think +only of the method by which lesser sums may be +converted into larger ones, and schools the other +into the worship and admiration of riches and +rich men. Of all conversions there is none so +speedy or so sure as when the ambitious youth +changes into the avaricious one."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">[Pg 147]</a></span></p> + +<p>Nowhere is Plato more keen or more fair than +in his judgment of the money-maker. He says +that he will generally do the right thing; he will +be eminently respectable; he will not sink to very +low or disreputable courses. All his goodness, +however, will be of a forced, constrained, artificial, +and at bottom unreal character. He will be good +because he has to, in order to maintain that standing +in the community on which his wealth depends. +In Plato's own words: "He coerces his bad passions +by an effort of virtue; not that he convinces +them of evil, or exerts over them the gentle influence +of reason, but he acts upon them by necessity +and fear, and because he trembles for his possessions. +This sort of man will be at war with himself: +he will be two men, not one; but, in general, +his better desires will be found to prevail over his +inferior ones. For these reasons such an one +will be more decent than many are; yet the true +virtue of a unanimous and harmonious soul will +be far out of his reach."</p> + +<p>The next step down for the state is what Plato +calls democracy. Of the democracy of intelligence +and self-control diffused throughout the body of +self-respecting citizens Plato had formed and could +form no conception. By democracy he meant the +state of things where each man does that which is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">[Pg 148]</a></span> +right in his own eyes. "In the first place the +citizens are free. The city is full of freedom and +frankness—there a man may do as he likes. +They have a complete assortment of constitutions; +and if a man has a mind to establish a state, he +must go to a democracy as he would go to a +bazaar, where they sell them, and pick out one +that suits him. Democracy is a most accommodating +and charming form of government, full of +variety and diversity, and (this, perhaps, is the +keenest of all Plato's keen thrusts) <i>dispensing +equality to equals and unequals alike</i>."</p> + +<p>The man corresponding to democracy in the +state, is the man whose life is given over to the +undiscriminating enjoyment of all sorts of pleasures. +"In this way the young man passes out of +his original nature which was trained in the school +of necessity, into the freedom and libertinism of +useless and unnecessary pleasures, putting the +government of himself into the hands of the one +of his pleasures that offers and wins the turn; and +when he has had enough of that, then into the +hands of another, and is very impartial in his +encouragement of them all. Neither does he receive +or admit into the fortress any true word of +advice; if any one says to him that some pleasures +are the satisfactions of good and noble desires,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">[Pg 149]</a></span> +and others of evil desires, and that he ought to use +and honour some and curtail and reduce others—whenever +this is repeated to him he shakes his +head and says that they are all alike, and that one +is as honourable as another. He lives through the +day, indulging the appetite of the hour; and sometimes +he is lapped in drink and strains of the flute; +then he is for total abstinence, and tries to get +thin; then again, he is at gymnastics; sometimes +idling and neglecting everything, then once more +living the life of a philosopher; often he is at +politics, and starts to his feet and says and does +anything that may turn up; and, if he is emulous +of any one who is a warrior, off he is in that direction, +or of men of business, once more in that. +His life has neither order nor law; and this is the +way of him,—this he terms joy and freedom and +happiness. There is liberty, equality, and fraternity +enough in him."</p> + +<p>The life of chance desire, unregulated by any +subordinating principle, then, is the third stage of +the descent and degradation of the soul.</p> + +<p>In the state democracy speedily and inevitably +passes over into tyranny. All appetite is insatiable. +In a state where each citizen does what he +pleases "all things are just ready to burst with +liberty; excess of liberty, whether in states or in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">[Pg 150]</a></span>dividuals, +seems only to pass into excess of slavery. +Then tyranny naturally arises out of democracy." +He then proceeds, with prophetic pen, to trace the +evolution of the modern political boss. First +there develops a class of drones who get their +living as professional politicians. Second, "there +is the richest class, which, in a nation of traders, +is generally the most orderly; they are the most +squeezable persons and yield the largest amount +of honey to the drones; this is called the wealthy +class, and the drones feed upon them. There is +also a third class, consisting of working-men who +are not politicians and have little to live upon; +these, when assembled, are the largest and most +powerful class in a democracy; but then, the multitude +is seldom willing to meet unless they get a +little honey. Their leaders take the estates of the +rich and give to the people as much of them as +they can consistently with keeping the greater +part themselves. The people have always some +one as a champion whom they raise into greatness. +This is the very root from which a tyrant (that is, +as we should say, a boss) comes. When he first +appears above ground, he is a protector. At first, +in the early days of his power, he smiles upon +every one and salutes every one; he, to be called a +tyrant who is making promises in public and also in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">[Pg 151]</a></span> +private, and wanting to be kind and good to every +one! Thus liberty, getting out of all order and +reason, passes into the harshest and bitterest form +of slavery." The worst form of government, according +to Plato, is that which we know too well +to-day in our great cities: the government of the +professional politician who maintains himself by +buying the votes of the poor with the money he +has squeezed out of the rich. All pretence of +administering the government in the interest of +the community is frankly abandoned. The boss, +or tyrant, as Plato calls him, frankly and unblushingly +avows that he is in politics for what he can +get out of it.</p> + +<p>The true statesman, the philosopher king, in +Plato's phrase, sees and serves the public good. +Such a government Plato calls an aristocracy, or +the government of the best for the good of all. +First below that comes timocracy, or the government +of those who are ambitious for power and +place. Next comes oligarchy, the government of +the rich for the protection of the interests of the +moneyed class. Next below that, and as a logical +consequence, comes populism, which is our word +for what Plato calls democracy; a government +which aims to satisfy the immediate wants of +everybody, regardless of moral, legal, or constitu<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">[Pg 152]</a></span>tional +restraints. Last, and lowest of all, comes +the rule of the professional politician who has +thrown all pretence of regard for the public good, +all consideration of honour, all loyalty to the rich +and genuine sympathy for the poor to the winds, +and is simply manipulating the forms of government, +getting and distributing offices, collecting +assessments and distributing bribes, all in the +interests of his own private pocket. Between disinterested +service of the public good and such unblushing +pursuit of private gain, Plato says that +there is no stopping place. Logically Plato is +right; historically, too, he was right at the time +when he was writing. Modern democracy, however, +is a very different thing from the populistic +democracy with which Plato was familiar and +which our large cities know too well. A democracy, +resting on intelligence and public spirit, diffused +through rich and poor alike, was beyond +Plato's profoundest dreams. That great experiment +the American people, with their public-school +system, and their principle of the equality of all +before the law, are now trying on a gigantic scale.</p> + +<p>Corresponding to the tyrannical state comes the +tyrannical man. "The wild beast in our nature gets +the upper hand and the man becomes drunken, +lustful, passionate, the best elements in him are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">[Pg 153]</a></span> +enslaved; and there is a small ruling part which +is also the worst and the maddest. He has the +soul of the slave, and the tyrannical soul must +always be poor and insatiable. He is by far the +most miserable of all men." "He who is the real +tyrant, whatever men may think, is the real servant +and is obliged to practice the greatest adulation +and servility and be the flatterer of mankind; +he has desires which he is truly unable to satisfy, +and has more wants than any one, and is truly poor +if you know how to inspect the soul of him. All +his life long he is beset with fear and is full of +convulsions and distractions. Even as the state +which he resembles, he grows worse from having +power; he becomes of necessity more jealous, +more faithless, more unjust, more impious; he +entertains and nurtures every evil sentiment, and +the consequence is that he is supremely miserable +and thus he makes everybody else equally miserable."</p> + + +<h4>VII<br /> +THE INTRINSIC SUPERIORITY OF RIGHTEOUSNESS</h4> + +<p>Plato first constructs the ideal character and +shows that it consists in the righteous rule of +the intelligent principle in man over the spirit and +the appetites. A soul thus in harmony with itself,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">[Pg 154]</a></span> +under the rule of reason, is at once healthy, +happy, beautiful, and good. Later, reversing the +process, he shows how the good, beautiful, true, +healthy condition of the soul may be destroyed +through the successive steps of pride, avarice, +lawless liberty, ending at last in the tyrannous +rule of some single appetite or passion +which has dethroned reason and set itself up as +supreme. The consequence of it all is that "the +most righteous man is also the happiest, and this +is he who is the most royal master of himself; the +worst and most unrighteous man is also the most +miserable; this is he who is also the greatest +tyrant of himself and the most complete slave."</p> + +<p>The reason why the life of a righteous man is +happier than the life of an unrighteous man is +that it has "a greater share in pure existence +as a more real being." "If there be a pleasure in +being filled with that which agrees with nature; +that which is more really filled with more real +being will have more real and true joy and +pleasure; whereas, that which participates in less +real being will be less truly and surely satisfied +and will participate in a less true and real pleasure. +Those, then, who know not wisdom and +virtue, and are always busy with gluttony and +sensuality, never pass into the true upper world;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">[Pg 155]</a></span> +neither are they truly filled with true being, nor do +they taste of true and abiding pleasure. Like +brute animals, with their eyes down and bodies +bent to the earth, or leaning on the dining table, +they fatten and feed and breed, and, in their +excessive love of these delights, they kick and butt +at one another with horns and hoofs which are +made of iron; they kill one another by reason of +their insatiable lust; for they fill themselves with +that which is not substantial, and the part of +themselves which they fill is also unsubstantial +and incontinent." "Thus when the whole soul +follows the philosophical principle, and there is no +division, the several parts, each of them, do their +own business and are righteous, and each of them +enjoy their own best and truest pleasures. But +when either of the other principles prevails, it +fails in attaining its own pleasure and compels the +others to pursue after a shadow of pleasure which +is not theirs."</p> + +<p>Having reached this point Plato introduces a +figure, which carries the whole point of his argument. +"Do you now model the form of a multitudinous, +polycephalous beast, having a head of all +manner of beasts, tame and wild, making a second +form as of a lion, and a third of a man; the +second smaller than the first, and the third smaller<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">[Pg 156]</a></span> +than the second; then join them and let the three +grow into one. Now fashion the outside into a +single image as of a man, so that he who is not +able to look within may believe the beast to be a +single human creature. Now unrighteousness consists +in feasting the monster and strengthening the +lion in one in such wise as to weaken and starve +the man; while righteousness consists in so +strengthening the man within him that he may +govern the many-headed monster." "Righteousness +subjects the beast to the man, or rather to the +god in man, and unrighteousness is that which +subjects the man to the beast."</p> + +<p>Finally Plato sums up the discussion by anticipating +the question which Jesus asked four centuries +later. "How would a man profit if he receive +gold and silver on the condition that he was to +enslave the noblest part of him to the worst? +Who can imagine that a man who sold his son or +daughter into slavery for money, especially if he sold +them into the hands of fierce and evil men, would +be the gainer, however much might be the sum +which he received? And will any one say that +he is not a miserable caitiff who sells his own +divine being to that which is most godless and +detestable and has no pity? Eriphyle took the +necklace as the price of her husband's life, but he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</a></span> +is taking a bribe in order to compass a worse ruin." +He even pushes the question a step further and asks, +"What shall a man be profited by unrighteousness +even if his unrighteousness be undetected? For +he who is undetected only gets worse; whereas he +who is detected and punished has the brutal part +of his nature silenced and humanised; the gentler +element in him is liberated and his whole soul +is perfected and ennobled by the acquirement of +righteousness and temperance and wisdom. The +man of understanding will concentrate himself on +this as the work of life. In the first place he will +honour studies which impress these qualities on his +soul and will disregard others. In the next place +he will keep under his body and will be far from +yielding to brutal and irrational pleasures, and he +will be always desirous of preserving the harmony +of the body for the sake of the concord of the +soul. He will not allow himself to be dazzled by +the opinion of the world and heap up riches to his +own infinite harm. He will look at the city which +is within him, and he will duly regulate his acquisition +and expense, in so far as he is able, and for +the same reason he will accept such honours as he +deems likely to make him a better man. He will +look at the nature of the soul, and, from the consideration +of this, he will determine which is the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</a></span> +better and which is the worst life and make his +choice, giving the name of evil to the life which will +make his soul more unrighteous, and good to the life +which will make his soul more righteous; for this is +the best choice,—best for this life and after death. +Wherefore my counsel is, that we hold fast to the +heavenly way and follow after righteousness and +virtue always, considering that the soul is immortal +and able to endure every sort of good and +every sort of evil; then shall we live dear to one +another and the gods, both while remaining here +and when, like conquerors in the games who go +round to gather gifts, we receive our reward."</p> + +<p>With this magnificent tribute to the intrinsic +superiority of righteousness over unrighteousness +Plato concludes his greatest work. The question +why a man should do right, even if he wore the +ring of Gyges which would exempt him from all +external consequences of his misdeeds, has been +answered by a thoroughgoing analysis of the +nature of the soul, and the demonstration that +righteousness is that organisation of the elements +of the soul into an active and harmonious unity, +wherein its health and beauty and life and happiness +consist. In conclusion let us borrow from +another of Plato's dialogues the prayer which he +ascribes to Socrates,—a brief and simple prayer,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">[Pg 159]</a></span> +yet one which, in the light of our study of the +Republic, I trust we shall recognise as summing +up the spirit of his teaching as a whole. "Beloved +Pan, and all ye gods who haunt this place, give me +beauty in the inward soul; and may the outward +and inward man be at one. May I reckon the +wise to be the wealthy; and may I have such a +quantity of gold as none but the temperate can +carry. Anything more? That prayer, I think, +is enough for me."</p> + + +<h4>VIII<br /> +TRUTH AND ERROR IN PLATONISM</h4> + +<p>Obviously this Platonic principle is vastly +deeper and truer than anything we have had +before. The personality at which both Stoic and +Epicurean aimed was highly abstract,—something +to be gained by getting away from the tangle and +complexity of life rather than by conquering and +transforming the conditions of existence into expressions +of ourselves. Epicurus makes a few +sallies from his cosey comfortable camp, to forage +for provender. The Stoic draws into the citadel +of his own self-sufficiency; and from this fortified +position defies attack. Plato comes out into the +open field, and squarely gives battle to the hosts<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</a></span> +of appetite, passion, temptation, and corruption, +of which the world outside, and our hearts inside +are full. In this he is true to the moral experience +of the race: and his trumpet-call to the +higher departments of our nature to enter the +"great combat of righteousness"; his demand of +instantaneous and absolute surrender which he presents +to everything low and sensual within us, +are clear, strong notes which it is good for every +one of us to hear and heed. To him as to Carlyle, +"Life is not a May-game, but a battle and +a march, a warfare with principalities and powers. +No idle promenade through fragrant orange-groves +and green flowery spaces waited on by the +choral muses and the rosy hours; it is a stern pilgrimage +through the rough, burning sandy solitudes, +through regions of thick-ribbed ice. He +walks among men, loves men with inexpressible +soft pity, as they <i>cannot</i> love him; but his soul +dwells in solitude, in the uttermost parts of creation. +All Heaven, all Pandemonium are his +escort. The stars, keen glancing, from the immensities, +send tidings to him; the graves, silent with +their dead, from the eternities. Deep calls for +him unto deep.</p> + +<p>"Thou, O World, how wilt thou secure thyself +against this man? None of thy promotions is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">[Pg 161]</a></span> +necessary for him. His place is with the stars +of Heaven; to thee it may be momentous, to thee +it may be life or death; to him it is indifferent, +whether thou place him in the lowest hut, or forty +feet higher at the top of thy stupendous high +tower, while here on Earth. He wants none of +thy rewards; behold also he fears none of thy +penalties. Thou canst not hire him by thy +guineas; nor by thy gibbets and law-penalties +restrain him. Thou canst not forward him; thou +canst not hinder him. Thy penalties, thy poverties, +neglects, contumelies,—behold all these are +good for him. To this man death is not a bugbear; +to this man life is already as earnest and +awful, and beautiful and terrible as death."</p> + +<p>This is a note which appeals forcibly to +every noble youth. It has been struck by the +Hebrew Prophets and the Christian Apostles: by +Savonarola and Fichte, and a host of heroic souls; +but by no one more clearly and constrainingly +than by Plato. It is the note of earnest and +aggressive righteousness; without which no personality +can be either sound or strong. The man +who has never heard this summons to go forth +and conquer the evils of the world without and of +his own heart within him, in the name of a righteousness +high above both his own attainment and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">[Pg 162]</a></span> +the attainment of the world about him as the +heavens are higher than the earth, is still in the +nursery stage of personal development.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, there is danger in the very +sharpness of the antithesis which Platonism makes +between the higher and the lower. For the most +part this danger is latent in Plato himself; though +even in him it came out in his tendency to +regard family life and private property as detrimental +rather than serviceable to that development +of character on which the larger devotion +to the state, and the ideal order, must ultimately +rest.</p> + +<p>In Neoplatonism, in the many forms of mysticism, +in certain aspects of Christian asceticism, +and notably in the numerous phases of what calls +itself "New Thought" to-day, what was for the +most part latent in Plato, becomes frankly explicit. +In general it is a loosening of the ties that hold +us to drudgery and homely duty; a weakening of +the bonds that bind us to the men and women by +our side, in order to gaze more serenely on the +ineffable beyond the clouds. This developed +Platonism admits that we must live after a fashion +in this very imperfect world; but says our real +conversation all the time must be in heaven. Individual +people are but faulty, imperfect copies<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">[Pg 163]</a></span> +of the pattern of the perfect good laid up on high. +We must buy and sell, work and play, laugh and +cry, love and hate down here among the shadows; +but we must all the time feed our souls on the +good, the true, the beautiful, which these distorted +human shadows only serve to hide. These Platonic +lovers of something better than their husbands +or wives, or associates or friends, go through +the world with a serene smile, and an air of other-worldliness +which, if we do not inquire too closely +into their domestic life and business efficiency, +we cannot but admire. They undoubtedly exert a +tranquillising influence in their way, especially on +those who are so fortunate as to behold them from +a little distance. But they are not the most comfortable +people to live with, as husband or wife, +colleague or business partner. Louisa Alcott had +this Platonic type in mind when she defined a +philosopher as a man up in a balloon, with his +family and friends having hold of the ropes, trying +to pull him down to earth.</p> + +<p>A good deal that passes for religion is this +Neoplatonism masquerading in Christian dress. +All such hymns as "The Sweet By and By," "Oh, +Paradise, Oh, Paradise," and the like, which set +heaven and eternity in sharp antithesis against +earth and time, are simply Neoplatonism baptized<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">[Pg 164]</a></span> +into Christian phraseology; and the baptism is +by sprinkling rather than immersion.</p> + +<p>Thomas à Kempis's "Imitation of Christ," and +indeed all the mystical books of devotion—Tauler, +Fénelon, "The Theologia Germanica"—are +saturated with this Platonic or Neoplatonic +spirit. "Thou shalt lamentably fall away, if thou +set a value upon any worldly thing." "Let therefore +nothing which thou doest seem to thee great; +let nothing be grand, nothing of value or beauty, +nothing worthy of honour save what is eternal." +"Man approacheth so much the nearer unto God, +the farther he departeth from all earthly comfort." +These words from the "Imitation of Christ" sound +orthodox enough in our ears. But we ought to +understand once for all that it is Neoplatonic +mysticism, not essential Christianity, that breathes +through them.</p> + +<p>This type of personality reduces the world to +two mutually exclusive elements, God and self; +and permits no reconciliation or mediation between +them. Fénelon puts this dualism in the +form of a dilemma. "There is no middle course; +we must refer everything either to God or to self; +if to self, we have no other God than self; if to +God, we are then without selfish interests, and we +enter into self-abandonment." Undoubtedly for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">[Pg 165]</a></span> +evangelistic purposes the sharp antithesis has +great practical advantages. It is an easy way to +reach heaven—this of scorning earth; an easy +definition of the infinite to pronounce it the negation +of the finite.</p> + +<p>As Carlyle has represented for us the stronger +side of Platonism, his friend Emerson shall serve +to illustrate the weakness that lurks half hidden in +all this way of thinking. It is so concealed that +we shall hardly detect it unless we are sharply on +the watch for this tendency to exalt the Infinite at +the expense of the finite; the Universal at the +expense of the particular; God at the expense of +our neighbour.</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"Higher far into the pure realm,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Over sun and star,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Over the flickering Dæmon film,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Thou must mount for love;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Into vision where all form<br /></span> +<span class="i0">In one only form dissolves;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Where unlike things are like;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Where good and ill,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And joy and moan,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Melt into one."<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>"Thus we are put in training for a love which +knows not sex, nor person, nor partiality. We are +made to feel that our affections are but tents of a +night. There are moments when the affections<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">[Pg 166]</a></span> +rule and absorb the man, and make his happiness +depend on a person or persons. But the warm +loves and fears that swept over us as clouds must +lose their finite character, and blend with God, to +attain their own perfection." "Before that heaven +which our presentiments foreshow us, we cannot +easily praise any form of life we have seen or read +of. Pressed on our attention, the saints and demigods +whom history worships fatigue and invade. +The soul gives itself, alone, original, and pure, to +the Lonely, Original, and Pure, who on that condition +gladly inhabits it." "The higher the style +we demand of friendship, of course the less easy +to establish it with flesh and blood. We walk +alone in the world. Friends such as we desire are +dreams and fables. But a sublime hope cheers +ever the faithful heart, that elsewhere, in other +regions of the universal power, souls are now acting, +enduring, daring, which can love us and which +we can love."</p> + +<p>"I do then with my friends as I do with my +books. I would have them where I can find them, +but I seldom use them. We must have society on +our own terms, and admit or exclude it on the +slightest cause. I cannot afford to speak much +with my friend. Then, though I prize my friends, +I cannot afford to talk with them and study their<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">[Pg 167]</a></span> +visions, lest I lose my own. It would indeed give +me a certain household joy to quit this lofty seeking, +this spiritual astronomy or search of stars, +and come down to warm sympathies with you; +but then I know well I shall mourn always the +vanishing of my mighty gods." "True love transcends +the unworthy object and dwells and broods +on the eternal, and when the poor interposed mask +crumbles, it is not sad, but feels rid of so much +earth, and feels its independency the surer."</p> + +<p>Here you have Plato and Thomas à Kempis in +the elegant garb of a heretical transcendentalist. +But you get the same dualism of finite and infinite, +perfect and imperfect; unworthy, crumbling earth-mask +to be gotten rid of here on earth, and the +stars to be sought out and gazed at up in heaven.</p> + +<p>The combat of the higher against the lower is +one in which we must all engage; and no doubt +in order to win we must at times keep the lower +solicitations at arm's-length. If, however, what +appeals to us in the name of the highest counsels +any relaxing of definite obligation, any alienation +from the man or woman whom social institutions +have placed closest by our side; any disloyalty to +the plain companions and humble associates whom +society or business places in our way; any breaking +of social bonds which generations of self<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">[Pg 168]</a></span>-sacrifice +and self-control have laboriously woven, +and centuries of experience have approved as +beneficent; then it is time to abandon Plato, or +rather those who have assumed to wear his mantle, +and look for personal guidance to those greater +masters who have transcended the antithesis of +higher and lower, which it was Plato's great mission +to make so sharp and clear. The principle +of such a reconciliation we shall find in Aristotle; +its complete accomplishment we shall find in +Jesus.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">[Pg 169]</a></span></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV"></a>CHAPTER IV</h2> + +<h3>THE ARISTOTELIAN SENSE OF PROPORTION</h3> + + +<h4>I<br /> +ARISTOTLE'S OBJECTIONS TO PREVIOUS SYSTEMS</h4> + +<p>Our principles of personality thus far, though +increasingly complex, have all been comparatively +simple. To get the maximum of pleasure; +to keep the universal law; to subordinate lower +impulses to higher according to some fixed scale +of value, are all principles which are easy to +grasp and by no means difficult to apply. The +fundamental trouble with them all is that they are +too easy. Life is not the cut-and-dried affair +which they presuppose. A man might have a lot +of pleasure, and yet be contemptible. He might +keep all the commandments, and yet be no better +than a Pharisee. Even Plato's principle in actual +practice has not always escaped the awful abyss of +asceticism.</p> + +<p>In opposition to Epicurus Aristotle says, "Pleasure +is not the good and all pleasures are not desirable. +No one would choose to live on condition<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">[Pg 170]</a></span> +of having no more intellect than a child all his life, +even though he were to enjoy to the full the pleasures +of a child. With regard to the pleasures which +all admit to be base, we must deny that they are +pleasures at all, except to those whose nature is +corrupt. What the good man thinks is pleasure +will be pleasure; what he delights in will be truly +pleasant. Those pleasures which perfect the activity +of the perfect and truly happy man may be called +in the truest sense the pleasures of a man. The +pleasure which is proper to a good activity is therefore +good; that attached to a bad one is bad. As, +then, activities differ, so do the pleasures which +accompany them."</p> + +<p>In our discussion of Epicureanism we saw that +the principle of pleasure consistently carried out +produced bad results, and, as in the case of Tito Melema, +developed the most contemptible character. +Aristotle shows conclusively why this must be so. +Pleasure is the sign and seal of healthful exercise +of function. A life which has all its powers in +effective and well-proportioned exercise will, indeed, +be a life crowned with pleasure. You cannot, +however, reverse this proposition, as the Epicurean +attempts to do, and say that a life which seeks the +maximum of pleasure will inevitably have the +healthy and proportionate exercise of function as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">[Pg 171]</a></span> +its consequent. According to Aristotle healthy +exercise of function in a well-proportioned life in +devotion to wide social ends and permanent personal +interests, is the cause of which happiness is +the appropriate and inevitable effect. Seek the +cause and you will get the effect. Seek directly +the effect, and you will miss both the cause you +neglect and the effect which only the cause can +bring. The criticism which we quoted from George +Eliot on the career of Melema is the quintessence +of the Aristotelian doctrine. To put it in a figure: +Build a good fire and warm your room, and the +mercury in the thermometer will rise. The cause +produces the effect. But it does not follow +that because you raise the mercury in the thermometer +by breathing on the bulb, or holding +it in your hand, that the fire will burn, or the +room will be warmed. The Epicureans and hedonists +are people who go about with the clinical +thermometer of pleasure under their tongues all +the time, and expect to see the world lighted with +benevolence and warmed with love in consequence. +Aristotle bids them take their clinical thermometers +out of their mouths; stop fingering their emotional +pulse; go to work about some useful business; +pursue some large and generous end; and then, not +otherwise, in case from time to time they have occa<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">[Pg 172]</a></span>sion +to feel their pulse and take their temperature, +they will as a matter of fact find that they are normal. +But it isn't taking the temperature and feeling +the pulse that makes them morally sound; it is +doing their proper work and keeping in vigorous +exercise that gives them the healthy pulse and +normal temperature.</p> + +<p>There are, however, two apparently contradictory +teachings about pleasure in Aristotle, and it is a +good test of our grasp of his doctrine to see +whether we can reconcile them. First he says, +"In all cases we must be especially on our guard +against pleasant things, and against pleasure; for +we can scarce judge her impartially. And so, in +our behaviour toward her, we should imitate the +behaviour of the old counsellors toward Helen, and +in all cases repeat their saying: If we dismiss +her, we shall be less likely to go wrong." "It is +pleasure that moves us to do what is base, and +pain that moves us to refrain from what is noble."</p> + +<p>On the other hand he says: "The pleasure or +pain that accompanies the acts must be taken as a +test of character. He who faces danger with pleasure, +or, at any rate, without pain, is courageous, +but he to whom this is painful is a coward. Indeed +we all more or less make pleasure our test in judging +actions."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">[Pg 173]</a></span></p> + +<p>Can we reconcile these two seemingly contradictory +statements? Perfectly. On the one hand +if we do an act simply for the pleasure it will give, +without first asking how the proposed act will fit +into our permanent plan of life, we are pretty sure +to go astray. For pleasure registers the goodness +of the isolated act; not the goodness of the act as +related to the whole plan of life. Thus if I drink +strong coffee at eleven o'clock at night, the +taste is pleasant and the immediate effect is stimulating. +But if it keeps me awake half the +night and unfits me for the duties of the next day, +in spite of the pleasure gained, the act is wrong. +And it is wrong, not fundamentally because of +the pains of wakefulness it brings; it is wrong +because it takes out of my life as a whole, and my +contribution to the life of the world, something +for which the petty transient pleasure I gained at +the moment of indulgence is no compensation +whatsoever. Is not Aristotle right? Do we not +pity as a miserable weakling, hardly fit to have +been graduated from the nursery, any man or +woman who will let the mere physical sensation of +a few moments at the end of an evening count +so much as the dust in the balance against the +efficiency of the coming forenoon's life and work?</p> + +<p>If we see this half of Aristotle's truth, we see<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">[Pg 174]</a></span> +that the other is not its contradiction but its complement. +If we are sorely and grievously tempted +by the coffee, if we give it up with pain, if saying +"No, I thank you," comes fearfully hard, if we +cannot forego it cheerfully without so much as +seriously considering the drinking of it as possible +for us, why then it reveals how little we care for the +life and work of the morrow; and since life and +work are but a succession of to-morrows, how little +we care for our life and work anyway. If we had +great aims burning in our minds and hearts, wide +interests to which body and soul were devoted, +it would not be a pain, it would be a pleasure, to +give up for the sake of them ten thousand times +as big a thing as a cup of coffee, if it stood in the +way of their accomplishment. Yes; Aristotle is +right on both points. Pleasure isolated from our +plan of life and followed as an end will lead us +into weakness and wickedness every time we +yield to its insidious solicitation. On the other +hand, the resolute and consistent prosecution of +large ends and generous interests will make a +positive pleasure of everything we either endure +or do to promote those ends and interests. Pleasure +directly pursued is the utter demoralisation +of life. Ends and interests, pursued for their +own sakes, inevitably carry with them a host of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">[Pg 175]</a></span> +noble pleasures, and the power to conquer and +transform what to the aimless life would be intolerable +pains.</p> + +<p>Aristotle rejects the Epicurean principle of +pleasure; because, though a proof that isolated +tendencies are satisfied, it is no adequate criterion +of the satisfaction of the self as a whole. He +rejects the Stoic principle of conformity to law; +because it fails to recognise the supreme worth of +individuality. He rejects the Platonic principle +of subordination of appetites and passions to a +supreme good which is above them; because he +dreads above all things the blight of asceticism, +and strives for a good which is concrete and +practical.</p> + +<p>What, then, is this good, which is neither a sum +of pleasures, nor conformity to law; nor yet +superiority to appetite and passion? What is +this principle which can at once enjoy pleasure to +the full, and at the same time forego it gladly; +which can make laws for itself more severe than +any lawgiver ever dared to lay down; and yet is +not afraid to break any law which its own conception +of good requires it to break; which honours +all our elemental appetites and passions, uses +money and honour and power as the servants of +its own ends, without ever being enslaved by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">[Pg 176]</a></span> +them? Evidently we are now on the track of a +principle infinitely more subtle and complex than +anything the pleasure-loving Epicurean, or the +formal Stoic, or the transcendental Platonist has +ever dreamed of. We are entering the presence +of the world's master moralist; and if we have +ever for a moment supposed that either of these +previous systems was satisfactory or final, it +behooves us now to take the shoes from off our +feet, and reverently listen to a voice as much +profounder and more reasonable than them all, +as they are superior to the senseless appetites and +blind passions of the mob. For if we have a +little patience with his subtlety, and can endure +the temporary shock of his apparent laxity, he will +admit us to the very holy of holies of personality.</p> + + +<h4>II<br /> +THE SOCIAL NATURE OF MAN</h4> + +<p>Before coming to Aristotle's positive doctrine +we must consider one fundamental axiom. Man +is by nature a social being. Whatever a man +seeks has a necessary and inevitable reference to +the judgment of other men, and the interest of +society as a whole. Strip a man of his relations +and you have no man left. The man who is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">[Pg 177]</a></span> +neither son, brother, husband, father, citizen, +neighbour or workman, is inconceivable. The +good which a man seeks, therefore, will express +itself consciously or unconsciously in terms of +other men's approval, and the furtherance of +interests which he inevitably shares with them. +The Greek word for private, peculiar to myself, +unrelated to the thought or interest of anybody +else, is our word for idiot. The New Testament +uses this word to describe the place to which +Judas went; a place which just suited such a man +as he, and was fit for nobody else. Now a man +who tries to be his own scientist, or his own lawgiver, +or his own statesman, or his own business +manager, or his own poet, or his own architect, +without reference to the standards and expectations +of his fellow-men, is just an idiot; or, as we say, a +"crank." A wise man may defy these standards. +The reformer often must do so. But if he is +really wise, if he is a true reformer, he must reckon +with them; he must understand them; he must +appeal to the actual or possible judgment and interest +of his fellows for the confirmation of what +he says and the justification of what he does. +This social reference of all our thoughts and +actions, which Aristotle grasped by intuition, psychology +in our day is laboriously and analytically<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">[Pg 178]</a></span> +seeking to confirm. Aristotle lays it down as an +axiom, that a man who does not devote himself +to some section of the social and spiritual world, +if such a being were conceivable, would be no +man at all. Family, or friends, or reputation, or +country, or God are there in the background, +secretly summoned to justify our every thought +and word and deed.</p> + +<p>Because man's nature is social, his end must +be social also. It will prevent misunderstanding +later, if we put the question squarely here, Does +the end justify the means? As popularly understood, +most emphatically No. The support of +a school is a good end. Does it justify the raising +of money by a lottery? Certainly not. The support +of one's family is a good end. Does it justify +drawing a salary for which no adequate services +are rendered? Certainly not.</p> + +<p>Yet if we push the question farther, and ask +why these particular ends do not justify these +particular means, we discover that it is because +these means employed are destructive of an end +vastly higher and greater than the particular +ends they are employed to serve. They break +down the structure and undermine the foundations +of the industrial and social order; an end infinitely +more important than the maintenance of any par<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">[Pg 179]</a></span>ticular +school, or the support of any individual +family. Hence these means are not to be judged by +their promotion of certain specific ends, but by their +failure to promote the greatest and best end of all; +the comprehensive welfare of society as a whole, of +which all institutions and families and individuals +are but subordinate members.</p> + +<p>Throughout our discussion of Aristotle we must +understand that the word "end" always has this +large social reference, and includes the highest +social service of which the man is capable. If +we attempt to apply to particular private ends of +our own what Aristotle applies to the universal +end at which all men ought to aim, we shall make +his teaching a pretext for the grossest crimes, +and reduce it to little more than sophisticated +selfishness. With this understanding of his +terms, we may venture to plunge boldly into his +system and state it in its most paradoxical and +startling form.</p> + + +<h4>III<br /> +RIGHT AND WRONG DETERMINED BY THE END</h4> + +<p>We are not either good or bad at the start. +Pleasure in itself is neither good nor bad. Laws +in themselves are neither good nor bad. It is +impossible to say with Plato that some faculties<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">[Pg 180]</a></span> +are so high that they always ought to be exercised, +and others are so low that as a rule they +ought to be suppressed. The right and wrong +of eating and drinking, of work and play, of sex +and society, of property and politics, lie not in +the elemental acts involved. All of these things +are right for one man in one set of circumstances, +wrong for another man in another set of circumstances. +We cannot say that a man who takes a +vow of poverty is either a better or a worse man +than a multi-millionnaire. We cannot say that the +monk who takes a vow of celibacy is a purer man +than one who does not. For the very fact that one +is compelled to take a vow of poverty or celibacy +is a sign that these elemental impulses are not +effectively and satisfactorily related to the normal +ends they are naturally intended to subserve. +All attempts to put virginity above motherhood, +to put poverty above riches, to put obscurity +above fame are, from the Aristotelian point of +view, essentially immoral. For they all assume +that there can be badness in external things, +wrong in isolated actions, vice in elemental appetites, +and sin in natural passions; whereas Aristotle +lays down the fundamental principle that the only +place where either badness or wrong or vice or +sin can reside is in the relation in which these<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">[Pg 181]</a></span> +external things and particular actions stand to +the clearly conceived and deliberately cherished +end which the man is seeking to promote. A +simpler way of saying the same thing, but a way +so simple and familiar as to be in danger of +missing the whole point, is to say that virtue +and vice reside exclusively in the wills of free +agents. That, every one will admit. But will +is the pursuit of ends. A will that seeks no +ends is a will that wills nothing; in other words, +no will at all. Whether an act is wrong or right, +then, depends on the whole plan of life of which +it is a part; on the relation in which it stands to +one's permanent interests. For these many years +I have defied class after class of college students +to bring in a single example of any elemental +appetite or passion which is intrinsically bad; +which in all circumstances and relations is evil. +And never yet has any student brought me one +such case. If brandy will tide the weak heart +over the crisis that follows a surgical operation, +then that glass of brandy is just as good and +precious as the dear life it saves. The proposition +that sexual love is intrinsically evil, and those who +take vows of celibacy are intrinsically superior, +is true only on condition that racial suicide is the +greatest good, and all the sweet ties of home<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">[Pg 182]</a></span> +and family and parenthood and brotherly love +are evils which it is our duty to combat. To +deny that wealth is good is only possible to him +who is prepared to go farther and denounce +civilisation as a calamity. He who brands ambition +as intrinsically evil must be prepared to herd +with swine, and share contentedly their fare of +husks.</p> + +<p>The foundation of personality, therefore, is the +power to clearly grasp an imaginary condition of +ourselves which is preferable to any practical +alternative; and then translate that potential +picture into an accomplished fact. Whoever lives +at a lower level than this constant translation of +pictured potency into energetic reality: whoever, +seeing the picture of the self he wants to be, +suffers aught less noble and less imperative than +that to determine his action misses the mark of +personality. Whoever sees the picture, and holds +it before his mind so clearly that all external +things which favour it are chosen for its sake, and +all proposed actions which would hinder it are +remorselessly rejected in its holy name and by its +mighty power;—he rises to the level of personality, +and his personality is of that clear, strong, +joyous, compelling, conquering, triumphant sort +which alone is worthy of the name.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">[Pg 183]</a></span></p> + +<p>How much deeper this goes than anything we +have had before! A man comes up for judgment. +If Epicurus chances to be seated on the throne, he +asks the candidate, "Have you had a good +time?" If he has, he opens the gates of Paradise; +if he has not, he bids him be off to the place +of torment where people who don't know how to +enjoy themselves ought to go.</p> + +<p>The Stoic asks him whether he has kept all +the commandments. If he has, then he may be +promoted to serve the great Commander in other +departments of the cosmic order. If he has +broken the least of them, no matter on what +pretext, or under what temptation, he is irrevocably +doomed. Plato asks him how well he has +managed to keep under his appetites and passions. +If the man has risen above them, Plato will +promote him to seats nearer the perfect goodness +of the gods. If he has slipped or failed, then he +must return for longer probation in the prison-house +of sense.</p> + +<p>Aristotle's judgment seat is a very different +place. A man comes to him who has had a very +sorry time: who has broken many commandments; +who has yielded time and again to sensuous +desires; yet who is a good husband, a +kind father, an honest workman, a loyal citizen,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">[Pg 184]</a></span> +a disinterested scientist or artist, a lover of his +fellows, a worshipper of God's beauty and beneficence; +and in spite of the sad time he has had, +in spite of the laws he has broken, in spite of the +appetites which have proved too strong for him, +Aristotle gives him his hand, and bids him go up +higher. For that man stands in genuine relations +to some aspects of the great social end +to which he devotes himself. And because some +portion of the real world has been made better +by the conception of it he has cherished, and the +fidelity with which he has translated his conception +into fact, therefore a share in the great glory +of the splendid whole belongs of right to him. +Good honest work, after an ideal plan, to the +full measure of his powers, with wise selection +of appropriate means, gives each individual his +place and rank in the vast workshop wherein +the eternal thoughts of God, revealed to men as +their several ideals, are wrought out into the +actuality of the social, economic, political, æsthetic +and spiritual order of the world.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, the man of scattered and +unfruitful pleasures, the man of merely clear +conscience, pure life, unstained reputation, with +his boast of rites observed, and ceremonies performed, +and laws unbroken, "faultily faultless,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">[Pg 185]</a></span> +icily regular, splendidly null," is the man above all +others whom Aristotle cannot endure.</p> + +<p>Do you wish, then, to know precisely where you +stand in the scale of personality? Here is the +test. How large a section of this world do you +care for, in such a vital, responsible way, that you +are thinking about its welfare, forming schemes +for its improvement, bending your energies toward +its advancement? Do you care for your profession +in that way? Do you care for your +family like that? Do you love your country +with such jealous solicitude for its honour and +prosperity? Can you honestly say that your +neighbour gets represented in your mind in this +imaginative, sympathetic, helpful way? Do you +think of God's great universe as something in +the goodness of which you rejoice, and for the +welfare of which you are earnestly enlisted? +Begin down at the bottom, with your stomach, +your pocket-book, your calling list, and go up +the scale until you come to these wider interests, +and mark the point where you cease to think +how these things might be better than they are +and to work to make them so, and that point +where your imagination and your service stops, +and your indifference and irresponsibility begins, +will show you precisely how you stand on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">[Pg 186]</a></span> +rank-book of God. The magnitude of the ends +you see and serve is the measure of your personality. +Personality is not an entity we carry +around in our spiritual pockets. It is an energy, +which is no whit larger or smaller than the ends +it aims at and the work it does. If you are not +doing anything or caring for anybody, or devoted +to any end, you will not be called up at some +future time and formally punished for your negligence. +Plato might flatter your self-importance +with that notion, but not Aristotle. Aristotle +tells you, not that your soul will be punished +hereafter, but that it is lost already.</p> + +<p>Goodness does not consist in doing or refraining +from doing this or that particular thing. +It depends on the whole aim and purpose of +the man who does it, or refrains from doing it. +Anything which a good man does as part of +the best plan of life is made thereby a good +act. And anything that a bad man does, as part +of a bad plan of life, becomes thereby an evil +act. Precisely the same external act is good +for one man and bad for another. An example +or two will make this clear.</p> + +<p>Two men seek political office. For one man +it is the gate of heaven; to the other it is the +door to hell. One man has established himself<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">[Pg 187]</a></span> +in a business or profession in which he can earn +an honest living and support his family. He +has acquired sufficient standing in his business +so that he can turn it over temporarily to his +partners or subordinates. He has solved his +own problem; and he has strength, time, energy, +capacity, money, which he can give to solving +the problems of the public. Were he to shirk +public office, or evade it, or fail to take all legitimate +means to secure it, he would be a coward, +a traitor, a parasite on the body politic. For +there is good work to be done, which he is able +to do, and can afford to do, without unreasonable +sacrifice of himself or his family. Hence public +office is for this man the gateway of heaven.</p> + +<p>The other man has not mastered any business or +profession; he has not made himself indispensable +to any employer or firm; he has no permanent +means of supporting himself and his family. He +sees a political office in which he can get a little +more salary for doing a good deal less work +than is possible in his present position. He +seeks the office, as a means of getting his living +out of the public. From that day forth he joins +the horde of mere office-seekers, aiming to get +out of the public a living he is too lazy, or too +incompetent, or too proud to earn in private<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">[Pg 188]</a></span> +employment. Thus the very same external act, +which was the other man's strait, narrow gateway +to heaven, is for this man the broad, easy +descent into hell.</p> + +<p>Two women join the same woman's club, and +take part in the same programme. One of them +has her heart in her home; has fulfilled all the +sweet charities of daughter, sister, wife, or mother; +and in order to bring back to these loved ones +at home wider interests, larger friendships, and a +richer and more varied interest in life, has gone +out into the work and life of the club. No angel +in heaven is better employed than she in the +preparation and delivery of her papers and her +attendance on committee meetings and afternoon +teas.</p> + +<p>The other woman finds home life dull and +monotonous. She likes to get away from her +children. She craves excitement, flattery, fame, +social importance. She is restless, irritable, out +of sorts, censorious, complaining at home; animated, +gracious, affable, complaisant abroad. For +drudgery and duty she has no strength, taste, or +talent; and the thought of these things are +enough to give her dyspepsia, insomnia, and +nervous prostration. But for all sorts of public +functions, for the preparation of reports, and the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">[Pg 189]</a></span> +organisation of new charitable and philanthropic +and social schemes, she has all the energy of a +steam-engine, the power of a dynamo. When +this woman joins a new club, or writes a new +paper, or gets a new office, though she does +not a single thing more than her angel sister +who sits by her side, she is playing the part of +a devil.</p> + +<p>It is not what one does; it is the whole purpose +of life consciously or unconsciously expressed in +the doing that measures the worth of the man +or woman who does it. At the family table, +at the bench in the shop, at the desk in the +office, in the seats at the theatre, in the ranks of +the army, in the pews of the church, saint and +sinner sit side by side; and often the keenest outward +observer cannot detect the slightest difference +in the particular things that they do. The +good man is he who, in each act he does or refrains +from doing, is seeking the good of all the persons +who are affected by his action. The bad man is the +man who, whatever he does or refrains from doing, +leaves out of account the interests of some of the +people whom his action is sure to affect. Is there +any sphere of human welfare to which you are indifferent? +Are there any people in the world +whose interests you deliberately disregard? Then,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">[Pg 190]</a></span> +no matter how many acts of charity and philanthropy, +and industry and public spirit you perform—acts +which would be good if a good man +did them—in spite of them all, you are to that +extent an evil man.</p> + +<p>We have, then, clearly in mind Aristotle's first +great concept. The end of life, which he calls +happiness, he defines as the identification of one's +self with some large social or intellectual object, +and the devotion of all one's powers to its disinterested +service. So far forth it is Carlyle's gospel +of the blessedness of work in a worthy cause. +"Blessed is he who has found his work; let him +ask no other blessedness. He has a work, a life +purpose; he has found it, and will follow it. The +only happiness a brave man ever troubled himself +with asking much about was happiness enough to +get his work done. Whatsoever of morality and +of intelligence; what of patience, perseverance, +faithfulness of method, insight, ingenuity, energy; +in a word, whatsoever of strength the man had in +him will lie written in the work he does. To +work: why, it is to try himself against Nature and +her everlasting unerring laws; these will tell a +true verdict as to the man."</p> + +<p>When we read Carlyle, we are apt to think such +words merely exaggerated rhetoric. Now Aris<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">[Pg 191]</a></span>totle +says the same thing in the cold, calculated +terms of precise philosophy. A man is what he +does. He can do nothing except what he first +sees as an unaccomplished idea, and then bends +all his energies to accomplish. In working out his +ideas and making them real, he at the same time +works out his own powers, and becomes a living +force, a working will in the world. And since the +soul is just this working will, the man has so much +soul, no more, no less, than he registers in manual +or mental work performed. To be able to point +to some sphere of external reality, a bushel of +corn, a web of cloth, a printed page, a healthful +tenement, an educated youth, a moral community, +and say that these things would not have been +there in the outward world, if they had not first +been in your mind as an idea controlling your +thought and action;—this is to point to the external +and visible counterpart and measure of the +invisible and internal energy which is your life, +your soul, your self, your personality.</p> + + +<h4>IV<br /> +THE NEED OF INSTRUMENTS</h4> + +<p>Aristotle's first doctrine, then, is that we +must work for worthy ends. The second follows<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">[Pg 192]</a></span> +directly from it. We must have tools to work +with; means by which to gain our ends. General +Gordon, who was something of a Platonist, remarked +to Cecil Rhodes, who was a good deal of +an Aristotelian, that he once had a whole room +full of gold offered him, and declined to take it. +"I should have taken it," replied Mr. Rhodes. +"What is the use of having great schemes if you +haven't the means to carry them out?" As Aristotle +says: "Happiness plainly requires external +goods; for it is impossible, or at least not easy, +to act nobly without some furniture of fortune. +There are many things that can be done only +through instruments, so to speak, such as friends +and wealth and political influence; and there are +some things whose absence takes the bloom off +our happiness, as good birth, the blessing of children, +personal beauty. Happiness, then, seems to +stand in need of this kind of prosperity."</p> + +<p>How different this from all our previous teachings! +The Epicurean wants little wealth, no +family, no official station; because all these things +involve so much care and bother. The Stoic +barely tolerates them as indifferent. Plato took +especial pains to deprive his guardians of most of +these very things. Aristotle on this point is perfectly +sane. He says you want them; because, to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">[Pg 193]</a></span> +the fullest life and the largest work, they are well-nigh +indispensable. The editor of a metropolitan +newspaper, the president of a railroad, the corporation +attorney cannot live their lives and do their +work effectively without comfortable homes, enjoyable +vacations, social connections, educational +opportunities, which cost a great deal of money. +For them to despise money would be to despise +the conditions of their own effective living, to pour +contempt on their own souls.</p> + +<p>Is Aristotle, then, a gross materialist, a mere +money-getter, pleasure-lover, office-seeker? Far +from it. These things are not the end of a noble +life, but means by which to serve ends far worthier +than themselves. To make these things the ends +of life, he explicitly says is shameful and unnatural. +The good, the true end, is "something which is a +man's own, and cannot be taken away from him."</p> + +<p>Now we have two fundamental Aristotelian doctrines. +We must have an end, some section of the +world which we undertake to mould according to +a pattern clearly seen and firmly grasped in our +own minds.</p> + +<p>Second, we must have instruments, tools, furniture +of fortune in the shape of health, wealth, +influence, power, friends, business and social and +political connections with which to carry out our<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">[Pg 194]</a></span> +ends. And the larger and nobler our ends, the +more of these instruments shall we require. If, +like Cecil Rhodes, we undertake for instance to +paint the map of Africa British red, we shall want +a monopoly of the product of the Kimberley and +adjacent diamond mines.</p> + + +<h4>V<br /> +THE HAPPY MEAN</h4> + +<p>The third great Aristotelian principle follows +directly from these two. If we are to use instruments +for some great end, then the amount of the +instruments we want, and the extent to which we +shall use them, will obviously be determined by the +end at which we aim. We must take just so much of +them as will best promote that end. This is Aristotle's +much misunderstood but most characteristic +doctrine of the mean. Approached from the point +of view which we have already gained, this doctrine +of the mean is perfectly intelligible, and altogether +reasonable. For instance, if you are an athlete, +and the winning of a foot-ball game is your end, +and you have an invitation to a ball the evening +before the game, what is the right and reasonable +thing to do? Dancing in itself is good. You +enjoy it. You would like to go. You need recrea<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">[Pg 195]</a></span>tion +after the long period of training. But if you +are wise, you will decline. Why? Because the +excitement of the ball, the late hours, the physical +effort, the nervous expenditure will use up more +energy than can be recovered before the game +comes off upon the morrow. You decline, not +because the ball is an intrinsic evil, or dancing is +intrinsically bad, or recreation is inherently injurious, +but because too much of these things, in the +precise circumstances in which you are placed, with +the specific end you have in view, would be disastrous. +On the other hand, will you have no +recreation the evening before the game; but simply +sit in your room and mope? That would be even +worse than going to the ball. For nature abhors +a vacuum in the mind no less than in the world of +matter. If you sit alone in your room, you will +begin to worry about the game, and very likely +lose your night's sleep, and be utterly unfitted when +the time arrives. Too little recreation in these +circumstances is as fatal as too much. What you +want is just enough to keep your mind pleasantly +diverted, without effort or exertion on your part. +If the glee club can be brought around to sing +some jolly songs, if a funny man can be found to +tell amusing stories, you have the happy mean; +that is, just enough recreation to put you in condi<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">[Pg 196]</a></span>tion +for a night's sound sleep, and bring you to +the contest on the morrow in prime physical and +mental condition.</p> + +<p>Aristotle, in his doctrine of the mean, is simply +telling us that this problem of the athlete on the +night before the contest is the personal problem of +us all every day of our lives.</p> + +<p>How late shall the student study at night? Shall +he keep on until past midnight year after year? +If he does, he will undermine his health, lose contact +with society, and defeat those ends of social +usefulness which ought to be part of every worthy +scholar's cherished end. On the other hand, shall +he fritter away all his evenings with convivial +fellows, and the society butterflies? Too much of +that sort of thing would soon put an end to scholarship +altogether. His problem is to find that +amount of study which will keep him sensitively +alive to the latest problems of his chosen subject; +and yet not make all his acquisitions comparatively +worthless either through broken health, or social +estrangement from his fellow-men. How rare and +precious that mean is, those of us who have to find +college professors are well aware. It is easy to +find scores of men who know their subject so well +that they know nothing and nobody else aright. +It is easy to find jolly, easy-going fellows who<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">[Pg 197]</a></span> +would not object to positions as college professors. +But the man who has enough good fellowship and +physical vigour to make his scholarship attractive +and effective, and enough scholarship to make his +vigour and good fellowship intellectually powerful +and personally stimulating,—he is the man who has +hit the Aristotelian mean; he is the man we are all +after; he is the man whom we would any of us +give a year's salary to find.</p> + +<p>The mean is not midway between zero and the +maximum attainable. As Aristotle says, "By the +mean relatively to us I understand that which is +neither too much nor too little for us; and that is +not one and the same for all. For instance, if ten +be too large and two be too small, if we take six, +we take the mean relatively to the thing itself, or +the arithmetical mean. But the mean relatively to +us cannot be found in this way. If ten pounds of +food is too much for a given man to eat, and two +pounds too little, it does not follow that the +trainer will order him six pounds; for that also +may perhaps be too much for the man in question, +or too little; too little for Milo, too much for the +beginner. And so we may say generally that a +master in any art avoids what is too much and +what is too little, and seeks for the mean and +chooses it—not the absolute but the relative<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">[Pg 198]</a></span> +mean. So that people are wont to say of a good +work, that nothing could be taken from it or added +to it, implying that excellence is destroyed by excess +or deficiency, but secured by observing the mean."</p> + +<p>The Aristotelian principle, of judging a situation +on its merits, and subordinating means to the supreme +end, was never more clearly stated than in +Lincoln's letter to Horace Greeley: "I would save +the Union. If there be those who would not save +the Union unless they could at the same time save +slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be +those who would not save the Union unless they +could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not +agree with them. My paramount object in this +struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to +save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the +Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; +and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I +would do it; and if I could save it by freeing +some and leaving others alone, I would do that. +What I do about slavery and the coloured race, I +do because I believe it helps to save the Union; +and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not +believe it would help to save the Union. I shall +do less whenever I believe what I am doing hurts +the cause, and I shall do more when I shall believe +doing more will help the cause."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">[Pg 199]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>VI<br /> +THE ARISTOTELIAN VIRTUES AND THEIR +ACQUISITION</h4> + +<p>The special forms that the one great virtue of +seeking the relative mean takes in actual life bear +a close correspondence to the cardinal virtues of +Plato; yet with a difference which marks a positive +advance in insight. Aristotle, to begin with, +distinguishes wisdom from prudence. Wisdom is +the theoretic knowledge of things as they are, +irrespective of their serviceableness to our practical +interests. In modern terms it is devotion to +pure science. This corresponds to Plato's contemplation +of the Good. According to Aristotle +this devotion to knowledge for its own sake underlies +all virtue; for only he who knows how things +stand related to each other in the actual world, +will be able to grasp aright that relation of means +to ends on which the success of the practical life +depends. Just as the engineer cannot build a +bridge across the Mississippi unless he knows +those laws of pure mathematics and physics +which underlie the stability of all structures, so the +man who is ignorant of economics, politics, sociology, +psychology, and ethics is sure to make a +botch of any attempts he may make to build<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">[Pg 200]</a></span> +bridges across the gulf which separates one man +from another man; one group of citizens from +another group. Pure science is at the basis of all +art, consciously or unconsciously; and therefore +wisdom is the fundamental form of virtue.</p> + +<p>Prudence comes next; the power to see, not the +theoretical relations of men and things to each +other, but the practical relationships of men and +things to our self-chosen ends. Wisdom knows +the laws which govern the strength of materials. +Prudence knows how strong a structure is necessary +to support the particular strain we wish to +place upon it. Wisdom knows sociology. Prudence +tells us whether in a given case it is better +to give a beggar a quarter of a dollar, an order on +a central bureau, a scolding, or a kick. The most +essential, and yet the rarest kind of prudence is +that considerateness which sensitively appreciates +the point of view of the people with whom we +deal, and takes proper account of those subtle +and complex sentiments, prejudices, traditions, and +ways of thinking, which taken together constitute +the social situation.</p> + +<p>Temperance, again, is not the repression of +lower impulses in the interest of those abstractly +higher, as it came to be in the popular interpretations +of Platonism, and as it was in Stoicism.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">[Pg 201]</a></span> +With Aristotle it is the stern and remorseless exclusion +of whatever cannot be brought into subjection +to my chosen ends, whatever they may be. +As Stevenson says in true Aristotelian spirit, +"We are not damned for doing wrong: we are +damned for not doing right." For temperance +lies not in the external thing done or left undone; +but in that relation of means to worthy +ends which either the doing or the not doing of +certain things may most effectively express. We +shall never get any common basis of understanding +on what we call the temperance question of +to-day until we learn to recognise this internal +and moral, as distinct from the external and +physical, definition of what true temperance is. +Temperance isn't abstinence. Temperance isn't +indulgence. Neither is it moderation in the +ordinary sense of that term. True temperance +is the using of just so much of a thing,—no +more, no less, but just so much,—as best promotes +the ends one has at heart. To discover whether +a man is temperate or not in anything, you must +first know the ends at which he aims; and then +the strictness with which he uses the means that +best further those ends, and foregoes the things +that would hinder them.</p> + +<p>Temperance of this kind looks at first sight like<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">[Pg 202]</a></span> +license. So it is if one's aims be not broad and +high. In the matter of sexual morality, Aristotle's +doctrine as applied in his day was notoriously +loose. Whatever did not interfere with +one's duties as citizen and soldier was held to +be permissible. Yet as Green and Muirhead, and +all the commentators on Aristotle have pointed +out, it is a deeper grasp of this very principle +of Aristotle, a widening of the conception of the +true social end, which is destined to put chastity +on its eternal rock foundation, and make of +sexual immorality the transparently weak and +wanton, cruel and unpardonable vice it is. To +do this, to be sure, there must be grafted on to it +the Christian principle of democracy,—a regard +for the rights and interests of persons as persons. +The beauty of the Aristotelian principle is that +it furnishes so stout and sturdy a stock to graft +this principle on to. When Christianity is unsupported +by some such solid trunk of rationality, +it easily drops into a sentimental asceticism. +Take, for example, this very matter of sexual +morality. Divorced from some such great social +end as Aristotelianism requires, the only defence +you have against the floods of sensuality is the +vague, sentimental, ascetic notion that in some +way or other these things are naughty, and good<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">[Pg 203]</a></span> +people ought not to do them. How utterly ineffective +such a barrier is, everybody who has +had much dealing with young men knows perfectly +well. And yet that is pretty much all the +opposition current and conventional morality is +offering at the present time. The Aristotelian +doctrine, with the Christian principle grafted on, +puts two plain questions to every man. Do you +include the sanctity of the home, the peace and +purity of family life, the dignity and welfare of +every man and woman, the honest birthright of +every child, as part of the social end at which +you aim? If you do, you are a noble and honourable +man. If you do not, then you are a disgrace +to the mother who bore you, and the home where +you were reared. So much for the question +of the end. The second question is concerned +with the means. Do you honestly believe that +loose and promiscuous sexual relations conduce +to that sanctity of the home, that peace and +purity of family life, that dignity and welfare of +every man and woman, that honest birthright of +every child, which as an honourable man you +must admit to be the proper end at which to +aim? If you think these means are conducive +to these ends, then you are certainly an egregious +fool. Temperance in these matters, then,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">[Pg 204]</a></span> +or to use its specific name, chastity, is simply the +refusal to ignore the great social end which +every decent man must recognise as reasonable +and right; and the resolute determination not to +admit into his own life, or inflict on the lives of +others, anything that is destructive of that social +end. Chastity is neither celibacy nor licentiousness. +It is far deeper than either, and far nobler +than them both. It is devotion to the great ends +of family integrity, personal dignity, and social +stability. It is including the welfare of society, +and of every man, woman, and child involved, +in the comprehensive end for which we live; +and holding all appetites and passions in strict +relation to that reasonable and righteous end.</p> + +<p>Aristotelian courage is simply the other side of +temperance. Temperance remorselessly cuts off +whatever hinders the ends at which we aim. +Courage, on the other hand, resolutely takes on +whatever dangers and losses, whatever pains and +penalties are incidental to the effective prosecution +of these ends. To hold consistently an end, is to +endure cheerfully whatever means the service of +that end demands. Aristotelian courage, rightly +conceived, leads us to the very threshold of +Christian sacrifice. He who comes to Christian +sacrifice by this approach of Aristotelian courage,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">[Pg 205]</a></span> +will be perfectly clear about the reasonableness of +it, and will escape that abyss of sentimentalism +into which too largely our Christian doctrine of +sacrifice has been allowed to drop.</p> + +<p>Courage does not depend on whether you save +your life, or risk your life, or lose your life. A +brave man may save his life in situations where a +coward would lose it and a fool would risk it. +The brave man is he who is so clear and firm in +his grasp of some worthy end that he will live if +he can best serve it by living; that he will die if +he can best serve it by dying; and he will take +his chances of life or death if taking those +chances is the best way to serve this end.</p> + +<p>The brave man does not like criticism, unpopularity, +defeat, hostility, any better than anybody +else. He does not pretend to like them. He +does not court them. He does not pose as a +martyr every chance that he can get. He simply +takes these pains and ills as under the circumstances +the best means of furthering the ends he +has at heart. For their sake he swallows criticism +and calls it good; invites opposition and glories +in overcoming it, or being overcome by it, as the +fates may decree; accepts persecution and rejoices +to be counted worthy to suffer in so good a cause.</p> + +<p>It is all a question here as everywhere in Aris<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">[Pg 206]</a></span>totle +of the ends at which one aims, and the sense +of proportion with which he chooses his means. +In his own words: "The man, then, who governs +his fear and likewise his confidence aright, facing +dangers it is right to face, and for the right cause, +in the right manner, and at the right time, is +courageous. For the courageous man regulates +both his feelings and his actions with due regard to +the circumstances and as reason and proportion +suggest. The courageous man, therefore, faces +danger and does the courageous thing because it +is a fine thing to do." As Muirhead sums up +Aristotle's teaching on this point: "True courage +must be for a noble object. Here, as in all excellence, +action and object, consequence and motive, +are inseparable. Unless the action is inspired +by a noble motive, and permeated throughout its +whole structure by a noble character, it has no +claim to the name of courage."</p> + +<p>The virtues cannot be learned out of a book, +or picked up ready-made. They must be acquired, +by practice, as is the case with the arts; and they are +not really ours until they have become so habitual +as to be practically automatic. The sign and seal +of the complete acquisition of any virtue is the +pleasure we take in it. Such pleasure once gained +becomes one's lasting and inalienable possession.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">[Pg 207]</a></span></p> + +<p>In Aristotle's words: "We acquire the virtues by +doing the acts, as is the case with the arts too. +We learn an art by doing that which we wish to +do when we have learned it; we become builders +by building, and harpers by playing on the harp. +And so by doing just acts we become just, and by +doing acts of temperance and courage we become +temperate and courageous. It is by our conduct +in our intercourse with other men that we become +just or unjust, and by acting in circumstances of +danger, and training ourselves to feel fear or confidence, +that we become courageous or cowardly." +"The happy man, then, as we define him, will +have the property of permanence, and all through +life will preserve his character; for he will be +occupied continually, or with the least possible +interruption, in excellent deeds and excellent speculations; +and whatever his fortune may be, he +will take it in the noblest fashion, and bear himself +always and in all things suitably. And if +it is what man does that determines the character +of his life, then no happy man will become +miserable, for he will never do what is hateful +and base. For we hold that the man who is +truly good and wise will bear with dignity whatever +fortune sends, and will always make the +best of his circumstances, as a good general will<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">[Pg 208]</a></span> +turn the forces at his command to the best +account."</p> + +<p>This doctrine that virtue, like skill in any game +or craft, is gained by practice, deserves a word of +comment. It seems to say, "You must do the +thing before you know how, in order to know how +after you have done it." Paradox or no paradox, +that is precisely the fact. The swimmer learns to +swim by floundering and splashing around in the +water; and if he is unwilling to do the floundering +and splashing before he can swim, he will never +become a swimmer. The ball-player must do a +lot of muffing and wild throwing before he can +become a sure catcher and a straight thrower. If +he is ashamed to go out on the diamond and make +these errors, he may as well give up at once all +idea of ever becoming a ball-player. For it is by +the progressive elimination of errors that the perfect +player is developed. The only place where +no errors are made, whether in base-ball or in life, +is on the grand stand. The courage to try to do a +thing before you know how, and the patience to +keep on trying after you have found out that you +don't know how, and the perseverance to renew +the trial as many times as necessary until you do +know how, are the three conditions of the acquisition +of physical skill, mental power, moral virtue, +or personal excellence.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">[Pg 209]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>VII<br /> +ARISTOTELIAN FRIENDSHIP</h4> + +<p>We are now prepared to see why Aristotle +regards friendship as the crown and consummation +of a virtuous life. No one has praised friendship +more highly, or written of it more profoundly +than he.</p> + +<p>Friendship he defines as "unanimity on questions +of the public advantage and on all that touches +life." This unanimity, however, is very different +from agreement in opinion. It is seeing things +from the same point of view; or, more accurately, +it is the appreciation of each other's interests and +aims. The whole tendency of Aristotle thus far +has been to develop individuality; to make each +man different from every other man. Conventional +people are all alike. But the people who +have cherished ends of their own, and who make +all their choices with reference to these inwardly +cherished ends, become highly differentiated. The +more individual your life becomes, the fewer +people there are who can understand you. The +man who has ends of his own is bound to be unintelligible +to the man who has no such ends, and +is merely drifting with the crowd. Now friend<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">[Pg 210]</a></span>ship +is the bringing together of these intensely +individual, highly differentiated persons on a basis +of mutual sympathy and common understanding. +Friendship is the recognition and respect of individuality +in others by persons who are highly +individualised themselves. That is why Aristotle +says true friendship is possible only between the +good; between people, that is, who are in earnest +about ends that are large and generous and public-spirited +enough to permit of being shared. +"The bad," he says, "desire the company of others, +but avoid their own. And because they avoid +their own company, there is no real basis for union +of aims and interests with their fellows." "Having +nothing lovable about them, they have no +friendly feelings toward themselves. If such a +condition is consummately miserable, the moral is +to shun vice, and strive after virtue with all one's +might. For in this way we shall at once have +friendly feelings toward ourselves and become the +friends of others. A good man stands in the same +relation to his friend as to himself, seeing that his +friend is a second self." "The conclusion, therefore, +is that if a man is to be happy, he will +require good friends."</p> + +<p>Friendship has as many planes as human life +and human association. The men with whom we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">[Pg 211]</a></span> +play golf and tennis, billiards and whist, are +friends on the lowest plane—that of common +pleasures. Our professional and business associates +are friends upon a little higher plane—that +of the interests we share. The men who have +the same social customs and intellectual tastes; +the men with whom we read our favourite authors, +and talk over our favourite topics, are friends upon +a still higher plane—that of identity of æsthetic +and intellectual pursuits. The highest plane, the +best friends, are those with whom we consciously +share the spiritual purpose of our lives. This +highest friendship is as precious as it is rare. +With such friends we drop at once into a matter-of-course +intimacy and communion. Nothing is +held back, nothing is concealed; our aims are +expressed with the assurance of sympathy; even +our shortcomings are confessed with the certainty +that they will be forgiven. Such friendship lasts +as long as the virtue which is its common bond. +Jealousy cannot come in to break it up. Absolute +sincerity, absolute loyalty,—these are the high +terms on which such friendship must be held. +A person may have many such friends on one +condition: that he shall not talk to any one friend +about what his friendship permits him to know +of another friend. Each such relation must be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">[Pg 212]</a></span> +complete within itself; and hermetically sealed, +so far as permitting any one else to come inside +the sacred circle of its mutual confidence. In +such friendship, differences, as of age, sex, station +in life, divide not, but rather enhance, the +sweetness and tenderness of the relationship. In +Aristotle's words: "The friendship of the good, +and of those who have the same virtues, is perfect +friendship. Such friendship, therefore, endures +so long as each retains his character, and virtue is +a lasting thing."</p> + + +<h4>VIII<br /> +CRITICISM AND SUMMARY OF ARISTOTLE'S +TEACHING</h4> + +<p>If finally we ask what are the limitations of +Aristotle, we find none save the limitations of +the age and city in which he lived. He lived +in a city-state where thirty thousand full male +citizens, with some seventy thousand women and +children dependent upon them, were supported +by the labour of some hundred thousand slaves. +The rights of man as such, whether native or +alien, male or female, free or slave, had not yet +been affirmed. That crowning proclamation of +universal emancipation was reserved for Chris<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">[Pg 213]</a></span>tianity +three centuries and a half later. Without +this Christian element no principle of personality +is complete. Not until the city-state of Plato +and Aristotle is widened to include the humblest +man, the lowliest woman, the most defenceless +little child, does their doctrine become final and +universal. Yet with this single limitation of its +range, the form of Aristotle's teaching is complete +and ultimate. Deeper, saner, stronger, wiser +statement of the principles of personality the +world has never heard.</p> + +<p>His teaching may be summed up in the following:—</p> + +<h5>TEN ARISTOTELIAN COMMANDMENTS</h5> + +<p>Thou shalt devote thy utmost powers to some +section of our common social welfare.</p> + +<p>Thou shalt hold this end above all lesser goods, +such as pleasure, money, honour.</p> + +<p>Thou shalt hold the instruments essential to the +service of this end second only to the end itself.</p> + +<p>Thou shalt ponder and revere the universal +laws that bind ends and means together in the +ordered universe.</p> + +<p>Thou shalt master and obey the specific laws +that govern the relation of means to thy chosen +end.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">[Pg 214]</a></span></p> + +<p>Thou shalt use just so much of the materials +and tools of life as the service of thy end requires.</p> + +<p>Thou shalt exclude from thy life all that exceeds +or falls below this mean, reckless of pleasure +lost.</p> + +<p>Thou shalt endure whatever hardship and privation +the maintenance of this mean in the service +of thy end requires, heedless of pain involved.</p> + +<p>Thou shalt remain steadfast in this service until +habit shall have made it a second nature, and +custom shall have transformed it into joy.</p> + +<p>Thou shalt find and hold a few like-minded +friends, to share with thee this lifelong devotion to +that common social welfare which is the task and +goal of man.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">[Pg 215]</a></span></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V"></a>CHAPTER V</h2> + +<h3>THE CHRISTIAN SPIRIT OF LOVE</h3> + + +<h4>I<br /> +THE TEACHING OF LOVE</h4> + +<p>Jesus taught His philosophy of life in three +ways: the personal, by example; the artistic, by +parable; and the scientific, by propositions.</p> + +<p>The first, though most vital and effective of all, +is expensive and wasteful. For in life principles +are so embedded in "muddy particulars," trivial +and sordid details, that they are liable to get lost. +The Master may be a long time with His disciples, +and yet not really be known. Even the disciples +themselves, after months of such teaching, like +James and John may not know what manner of +spirit they are of. Indeed it may become expedient +for them that the Master go away, that His +Spirit may be more clearly revealed.</p> + +<p>The artistic method, too, has drawbacks. For +though it gives the principles a new artificial setting, +with carefully selected details to catch the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">[Pg 216]</a></span> +crowd, yet the crowd catch simply the story. +Only the initiated are instructed; those who do +not already know the principles learn nothing, +but "seeing they do not see, and hearing they do +not understand," as Jesus, past master of this art +though He was, so often lamented.</p> + +<p>The third or scientific method is dry and prosaic. +It observes what qualities go together, or +refuse to go together, in the swift stream of life; +pulls them out of the stream; fixes them in concepts; +marks them by names; and states propositions +about them. It may go one short step +farther: it may arrange its propositions in syllogisms, +and deduce general conclusions, or laws. +It may take, for instance, as its major premise, +Love is the divine secret of blessedness. Then +for its minor premise it may take some plain +observed fact, Humility is essential to Love. +Then the conclusion or law will be, The humble +share the divine life and all the blessings it brings. +Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the +Kingdom of Heaven.</p> + +<p>Of course no one but a pedant draws out his +teaching in this laboured logical form. The syllogism +is condensed; the major, and perhaps even +the minor, premise is omitted, and often only the +conclusion appears.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">[Pg 217]</a></span></p> + +<p>At its best this method is hard and dry; yet +this is the method employed in such sayings as +those handed down in the summary called the +Sermon on the Mount. Perhaps that is why the +teaching of the "Sermon," in spite of its clear-cut +form, is much less studied and understood than +the teaching of Jesus' life and parables. To recover +this largely lost teaching one must warm +and moisten the cold, dry terms; supply, when +necessary, omitted premises; use some one word +rather than many for the often suppressed middle +term; and so draw out the latent logic that underlies +these laws.</p> + +<p>The middle term of all this argument is Love. +For that old-fashioned word, in spite of its sentimental +associations, much better than its modern +scientific synonyms, such as the socialising of the +self, expresses that outgoing of the self into the +lives of others, which, according to Jesus, is the +actual nature of God, the potential nature of man, +the secret of individual blessedness and the promise +of social salvation.</p> + +<p>In the two or three cases where the logic of His +principle, applied to our complex modern life, +points clearly to a modification of His literal precepts, +as in the management of wealth and the +bestowal of charity, I shall not hesitate to put the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">[Pg 218]</a></span> +logic of the teaching in place of the letter of the +precept, citing the latter afterward for comparison.</p> + +<p>A logical commentary like this will be most +helpful if it reverses the order usual in commentaries +of mere erudition, and introduces the steps +of the argument before rather than after the +passage they seek to make clear.</p> + +<p>In whichever of the three ways it is taught, +Love shines by its own light and speaks with its +own authority to all who have eyes to see and +ears to hear.</p> + +<p>A person who loves carries with him a generous +light-heartedness, a genial optimism, which +show all his friends that he has found some +secret which it is worth their while to learn.</p> + +<p>Every well-told parable or fable, every artistically +constructed novel or play, makes us take +sides with the large-hearted hero against the +mean, selfish villain.</p> + +<p>In the same way Love's formulated laws, showing +on what conditions it depends and to what +results it leads, convince every one who has the +experience by which to interpret them (and only +to him who hath experience is interpretation given) +that Love is the supreme law of life, and its +requirements the right and reasonable conditions +of individual and social well-being.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">[Pg 219]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>II<br /> +THE FULFILMENT OF LAW THROUGH LOVE</h4> + +<p>Jesus was born in a nation which had developed +law to the utmost nicety of detail, and recognised +all laws as expressions of the good will of God +seeking the welfare of men. Prolonged experiments +in living had proved certain kinds of +conduct disastrous, and the states of mind corresponding +to them, despicable. Law had prohibited +this disastrous conduct, and the prophets +had denounced these despicable traits.</p> + +<p>Of course latent in the prohibitions of law +was the constitution of the blessed Kingdom that +would result if the law were observed; and dimly +foreshadowed in the figurative expressions of the +prophets was the vision of the glorified human +society that would emerge when the despicable +traits should be extirpated and the better order +introduced. This negative and latent implication +of law Jesus developed into Love as the positive +and explicit principle of life; and this figuratively +foreshadowed prophet's vision He translated into +the actual fact of a community united in Love. +He fulfilled the law by putting Love in the heart, +and fulfilled the prophets by establishing a com<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">[Pg 220]</a></span>munity +based on Love. Jesus taught us to make +every human interest we touch as precious as our +own, and to treat all persons with whom we deal +as members of that beneficent system of mutual +good-will which is the Kingdom of Heaven. But +the moment we begin to do that, law as law becomes +superfluous; for what the law requires is +the very thing we most desire to do: prophecy as +prophecy is fulfilled; for the best man's heart can +dream has come to pass.</p> + +<p>In the ideal home, between well-married husband +and wife, child and parent, brother and +sister, this sweet law prevails. In choice circles +of intimate friends it is found. Jesus extended +this interpretation of others in terms of ourselves, +and of both others and self in terms of the system +of relations in which both self and others inhere, +so as to include all the dealing of official and +citizen, teacher and pupil, dealer and customer, +employer and employee, man and man.</p> + +<p>Jesus does not judge us by the formal test of +whether we have kept or broken this or that +specific commandment, but by the deeper and +more searching requirement that our lives shall +detract nothing from and add something to the +glory of God and the welfare of man.</p> + +<p>Is the world a happier, holier, better world<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">[Pg 221]</a></span> +because we are here in it, helping on God's good-will +for men? If that be the grand, comprehensive +purpose of our lives, honestly cherished, frankly +avowed, systematically cultivated, then, no matter +how far below perfection we may fall, that single +purpose, in spite of failure, defeat, and repented +sin, pulls us through. If we have this Spirit of +Love in our hearts, and if with Christ's help we +are trying to do something to make it real in +our lives and effective in the world, our eternal +salvation is assured. On the other hand, is there +a single point on which we deliberately are working +evil? Is the lot of any poor man harder, or +the life of any unhappy woman more sad and bitter, +for aught that we have done or left undone? +Is any good institution the weaker, or any bad +custom more prevalent, for aught that we are +deliberately and persistently withholding of help +or contributing of harm? If so, if in any one +point we are consciously and unrepentingly arrayed +against God's righteous purpose, and the +human welfare which is dear to God; if there is +a single point on which we are deliberately setting +aside His righteous will, and doing intentional +evil to the humblest of His children; then, notwithstanding +our high rank on other matters, our +lack of the right purpose, at even a single point,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">[Pg 222]</a></span> +makes us guilty of the whole; we are unfit for His +kingdom.</p> + +<p>Jesus' principle of Love, though for clearness +and incisiveness often stated in terms of mere +altruism, or regard for others, yet taken in its +total context, in the light of His never absent +reference to the Father's will and the Kingdom +of Heaven, is much deeper and broader than that. +It gives each man his place and function in the +total beneficent system which is the coming Kingdom +of God, and then treats him not merely as he may +wish to be treated, or we may wish to treat him, but +as his place and function in that system require.</p> + +<p>Mere altruism is often weakly kind, making +others feebly dependent on our benefactions instead +of sturdily self-supporting; making others +unconsciously egotistic as the result of our superfluous +ministrations or uncritical indulgence; and +even fostering a subtle egotism in ourselves, as +the result of the fatal habit of doing the easy, +kind thing rather than the hard, severe thing that +is needed to lift them to their highest attainment. +A true mother is never half as sentimentally altruistic +toward her child as a grandmother or an +aunt; she does not hesitate to reprove and correct, +when that is what the child needs to suppress +the low and lazy, and rouse the higher and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">[Pg 223]</a></span> +stronger self. The just administrator discharges +the incompetent and exposes the dishonest employee, +not merely because the good of the whole +requires it; but because even for the person discharged +or exposed, that is better than it would be +to allow him to drag out an unprofitable and cumbersome +life in tolerated uselessness or countenanced +graft.</p> + +<p>"Treat both others and yourself as their place +and yours in God's coming Kingdom require;" +that is the Golden Rule in its complete form. +"All things, therefore, whatsoever ye would that +men should do unto you" (remembering that both +you and they have places and functions in the +Father's Kingdom of Love); "even so do ye also +unto them: for this is the law and the prophets."</p> + +<p>This fulfilment of law is a very different thing +from selfishly breaking the law. That such a reformer +as Jesus ever took the conservative side of +any question seems at first sight so preposterous +that most candid critics believe that He never said +the words attributed to Him about breaking one of +the least of these commandments, or else that He +said them in a lost context which would greatly +alter their meaning. That, however, is not quite +sure. For Love at its best is never rudely iconoclastic. +Every good law in its original intent is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">[Pg 224]</a></span> +aimed to lift men out of their sensuality and selfishness +into at least an outward conformity to the +requirements of social well-being. And however +grotesque, fantastic, and superfluous such a law +under changed conditions may become, its original +intent will always keep it sacred and precious, +even after its purpose can be accomplished better +without it. To fulfil is not to destroy, or to take +delight in destruction. "Think not that I came to +destroy the law or the prophets; I came not to +destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, +Till heaven and earth shall pass away, one jot or +one tittle shall in no wise pass away from the law, +till all things be accomplished."</p> + +<p>At the same time Love is always changing and +superseding laws and institutions by pressure of +adjustment to the changing demands of individual +and social well-being. Laws and institutions are +made for men, rather than men for institutions and +laws; and the instant an old law ceases to serve +a new need in the best possible way, Love erects +the better service into a new law or institution, +superseding the old. Any law that fails to promote +the physical, mental, social, and spiritual good +of the persons and the community concerned, +thereby loses Love's sanction and becomes obsolete. +Law for law's sake, rather than for the sake<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">[Pg 225]</a></span> +of man and society, is the flat denial of Love. To +exalt any tradition, institution, custom, or prohibition +above the human and social good it has ceased +to serve, is to sink to the level of the scribe and +Pharisee—the deadliest enemies of Jesus, and all +for which He stood. "For I say unto you, that +except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness +of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in +no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven."</p> + +<p>In Love's eyes all anger, contempt, and quarrelsomeness +are as bad as murder—indeed are incipient +murder, stopped short of overt crime through +fear. The look, or word, or deed of unkindness, +the thought, or wish, or hope that evil may befall +another, even the attitude of cold indifference, is +murder in the heart. And it is only because we +lack the courage to translate wish into will that in +such cases we do not do the thing which, if done +without our responsibility, by accident or nature, +we should rejoice to see accomplished.</p> + +<p>From a strange and unexpected source there has +come the confirmation of this New Testament conception +of the prevalence, not to say the universality, +of murder. A brilliant but grossly perverse +English man of letters was sentenced to imprisonment +a few years ago for the foulest crime. From +the gaol in which he was confined there came a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">[Pg 226]</a></span> +most realistic description of the last days and final +execution within its walls of a lieutenant in the +British army, who was condemned for killing a +woman whom he loved.</p> + +<p>The poem has the exaggeration of a perverted +and embittered nature; but beneath the exaggeration +there is the original truth, which underlies +Jesus' identification of murder and hate. After +describing the last days of the condemned man, +his execution and his burial, the poem concludes +as follows:—</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"In Reading Gaol by Reading town<br /></span> +<span class="i0">There is a pit of shame,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And in it lies a wretched man<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Eaten by teeth of flame,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">In a burning winding sheet he lies<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And his grave has got no name.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"And there, till Christ call forth the dead,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">In silence let him lie:<br /></span> +<span class="i0">No need to waste the foolish tear,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Or heave the windy sigh:<br /></span> +<span class="i0">The man had killed the thing he loved,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And so he had to die.<br /></span> +</div><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">"And all men kill the thing they love,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">By all let this be heard,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Some do it with a bitter look,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Some with a flattering word:<br /></span> +<span class="i0">The coward does it with a kiss,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">The brave man with a sword."<br /></span> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">[Pg 227]</a></span></div></div> + +<p>Charge up against ourselves as murder the bitter +looks, the hateful words, the unkind thoughts, +the selfish actions, which have lessened the vitality, +diminished the joy, wounded the heart, and murdered +the happiness of those whom we ought to +love, whom perhaps at times we think we do love, +and who can profess to be guiltless?</p> + +<p>The harboured grudge, the unrepented injury, +the offence for which we have not begged pardon, +the employer's refusal to "recognise" his employees +or their representatives, and treat with them +on fair and equal terms, the workman's cultivated +attitude of hostility to his employer, are all such +flagrant violations of Love that acts of formal +piety or public worship on the part of a person +who harbours such feelings are an affront.</p> + +<p>Controversies, lawsuits, industrial or political +warfare in mere pride of opinion, class prejudice, +or greed of gain, without first making every effort +to respect the rights and protect the interests of +the other party and so bring about a reconciliation, +are all violations of Love and doom the +person who is guilty of them to dwell in the +narrow prison-house of a hard and hateful secularity, +where the last farthing of exacted penalty +must be paid, and hate is lord of life. "Ye have +heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">[Pg 228]</a></span> +shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in +danger of the judgment: but I say unto you, that +every one who is angry with his brother shall be +in danger of the judgment; and whosoever shall +say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the +council; and whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall +be in danger of the hell of fire. If, therefore, thou +art offering thy gift at the altar and there rememberest +that thy brother hath aught against thee, +leave there thy gift before the altar and go thy +way, first be reconciled to thy brother, and then +come and offer thy gift. Agree with thine adversary +quickly, whiles thou art with him in the way; +lest haply the adversary deliver thee to the judge, +and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou +be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, Thou +shalt by no means come out thence, till thou have +paid the last farthing."</p> + +<p>Marriage to the Christian is an infinitely higher +and holier estate than it could have been to any +of the earlier schools. It is an opportunity to +share with another person the creative prerogative +of God. It brings opportunity for Love enhanced +by the highest of complementary differences, under +circumstances of tenderest intimacy, with the requirement +of lifelong constancy.</p> + +<p>From Love's point of view any lack of tender<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">[Pg 229]</a></span> +reverence for the person of another, whether in or +out of marriage sinks man to the plane of the +brute. Not that the normal exercise of any appetite +or passion is base or evil in itself. All are +holy, pure, divine, when Love through them assumes +the lifelong responsibilities they involve. +All that falls short of such tender reverence and +permanent responsibility is lust. Jesus established +chastity on the broad, rational basis of respect for +the dignity of woman and the sanctity of sex. +The logic of His teaching on this point is to place +chastity on the eternal rock foundation of treating +another only as Love and a true regard for the +other's permanent welfare will warrant. In other +words, Jesus permits no man to even wish to treat +any woman as he would be unwilling another +man should treat his own mother, sister, wife, or +daughter. For, from His standpoint, all women +are our sisters, daughters of the most high God. +This standard is searching and severe, no doubt; +but it is reasonable and right. There is not a +particle of asceticism about it. And the man who +violates it is not merely departing a little from +the beaten path of approved conventionalities. +He is doing a cruel, wanton wrong. He is doing +to another what he would bitterly resent if done +to one whom he held dear. And what right has<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">[Pg 230]</a></span> +any man to hold any woman cheap, a mere means +of his selfish gratification, and not an object of his +protection, and reverence, and chivalrous regard? +The worst mark of uneliminated brutality and barbarism +which the civilised world is carrying over +into the twentieth century, to curse and blacken +and pollute and embitter human life for a few generations +more, is this indifference to the Spirit of +Love, as it applies at this crucial point.</p> + +<p>To destroy a wife's health, to purchase a moment's +pleasure at the cost of a woman's lasting +degradation, or to participate in practices which +doom a whole class of wretched women to short-lived +disease and shame, and early and dishonoured +death (a recent reliable report estimates the cost +of lives from this cause alone in a single city as +5000 a year) is so gross and wanton a perversion +of manhood, that in comparison it would be better +not to be a man at all.</p> + +<p>All the devices for gratifying sexual passions +without the assumption of permanent responsibilities, +such as seduction, prostitution, and the +keeping of mistresses, Christianity brands as the +desecration of God's holiest temple, the human +body, and the wanton wounding of His most sensitive +creation,—woman's heart. The Greeks +placed little restriction on man's passions beyond<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">[Pg 231]</a></span> +such as was necessary to maintain sufficient +physical health and mental vigour to perform his +duties as a citizen in peace and in war. If the +individual is complete in himself, with no God +above who cares, no Christ who would be grieved, +no Spirit of Love to reproach, no rights of universal +brotherhood and sisterhood to be sensitively +respected and chivalrously maintained, then indeed +it is impossible to make out a valid claim for +severer control in these matters than Plato and +Aristotle advocate. If there are persons in the +world who are practically slaves, persons who +have no claim on our consideration, then licentiousness +and prostitution are logical and legitimate +expressions of human nature and inevitable +accompaniments of human society. Christianity, +however, has freed the slave in a deeper and +higher sense than the world has yet realised. +Christianity does not permit any one who calls +himself a Christian to leave any man or woman +outside the pale of that consideration which makes +this other person's dignity, and interest, and welfare +as precious and sacred to him as his own. +Obviously all loose and temporary sexual connections +involve such degradation, shame, and +sorrow to the woman involved, that no one who +holds her character, and happiness, and lasting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">[Pg 232]</a></span> +welfare dear to him can will for her these woful +consequences. One cannot at the same time be a +friend of the kindly, generous, sympathetic Christ +and treat a woman in that way. It is for this +reason, not on cold, ascetic grounds, that Christianity +limits sexual relations to the monogamous +family; for there only are the consequences to all +concerned such as one can choose for another +whom he really loves. If Christianity, at these +and other vital points, asks man to give up things +which Plato and Aristotle permit, it is not that +the Christian is narrower or more ascetic than +they; it is because Christianity has introduced a +Love so much higher, and deeper, and broader +than anything of which the profoundest Greeks +had dreamed, that it has made what was permissible +to their hard hearts forever impossible for +all the more sensitive souls in whom the Love of +Christ has come to dwell.</p> + +<p>"Ye have heard that it was said, Thou shalt not +commit adultery; but I say unto you, that every +one that looketh on a woman to lust after her +hath committed adultery with her already in his +heart. And if thy right eye causeth thee to +stumble, pluck it out, and cast it from thee; for +it is profitable for thee that one of thy members +should perish, and not thy whole body be cast into<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">[Pg 233]</a></span> +hell. And if thy right hand causeth thee to +stumble, cut it off, and cast it from thee; for it is +profitable for thee that one of thy members should +perish, and not thy whole body go into hell."</p> + +<p>Divorce is a confession of failure in Love's +supreme undertaking. No two Christians, who +have caught and kept alive the Spirit of Love +in the married state, ever were or ever will be, +ever wished to be or ever can be, divorced. No +one Christian who has the true Christian Spirit of +Love toward husband or wife will ever seek divorce +unless it be under such circumstances of +infidelity or brutality, neglect or cruelty, as +render the continuance of the relation a fruitless +casting of the pearls of affection before the +swinishness of sensuality. The determination of +the grounds on which divorce shall be granted belongs +to the sphere of the state, and is a problem +of social self-protection. The Christian church +makes a serious mistake when it spends its energies +in trying to build up legal barriers against +divorce. Its real mission at this point is to build +up in the hearts of its adherents the Spirit of Love +which will make marriage so sweet and sacred +that those who once enter it will find, as all true +Christians do find, divorce intolerable between two +Christians; and tolerable even for one Christian<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">[Pg 234]</a></span> +only as a last resort against hopeless and useless +degradation. To translate Christ's Spirit into the +life of the family is a much more Christian thing +to do than to attempt to enact this or that somewhat +general and enigmatical answer of His into +civil law. It is generally a mistake, a departure +from the Spirit of the Master, when the Christian +community as such turns from its specific task of +positive upbuilding of personality to the legal prohibition +of the things that are contrary to the +Christian Spirit. Laws and prohibitions, statutes +and penalties against drunkenness, Sabbath-breaking, +theft, murder, gambling, and divorce, we must +have. But those laws and penalties are best devised +and enforced by the state, as the representative +of the average sentiment of the community as +a whole, rather than by the distinctively Christian +element in the community, which in the nature of +things is very far above the average sentiment. +Undoubtedly the Christian Spirit is the only force +strong enough to save the family from degeneration +and dissolution in this intensely individualistic, +independent, materialistic, luxurious age. But we +must rely mainly on the Spirit working within, not +on a law imposed from without; on the healing +touch of the gentle Master, not on the hasty sword +of the impetuous Peter.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">[Pg 235]</a></span></p> + +<p>"It was said also, Whosoever shall put away his +wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement; +but I say unto you, that every one that putteth away +his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, maketh +her an adulteress; and whosoever shall marry her +when she is put away committeth adultery."</p> + +<p>Love fulfils at once the law of truth-telling and +the law against swearing; for words spoken in +Love need no adventitious support. The appeal +to anything outside one's self, and one's simple +statement, is clear evidence that there is no Love, +and therefore no truth within. Love has no desire +to deceive, and hence no fear of being disbelieved. +To back up one's words with an oath +is to confess one's own lack of confidence in +what one is saying, and to invite lack of confidence +in others. Anything more than a plain +statement of fact or feeling comes out of an insincere +or unloving heart. Of course here, as in +the case of divorce, what is the obvious and only +law for the disciple of Jesus may or may not be +wise for the civil authorities to enact into law and +impose upon all. If the state and the courts +think an oath helpful, the sensible Christian usually +will conform to public custom and requirement; +even though for him the practice is superfluous and +meaningless.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">[Pg 236]</a></span></p> + +<p>"Again, ye have heard that it was said to them +of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but +shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths; but I +say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by the +heaven, for it is the throne of God; nor by the +earth, for it is the footstool of his feet; nor by +Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. +Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, for thou +canst not make one hair white or black. But let +your speech be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay; and whatsoever +is more than these is of the evil one."</p> + +<p>Love is slow to take offence, and quick to +overlook. Selfishness is sensitive to slights, resentful +at wrongs; for it sees others only as their +acts affect us. Love seeks out the whole man +behind the harsh word or bad deed, takes his +point of view, and tries to discover some clue to +his concealed better self.</p> + +<p>Whether he does well or ill, Love lets us appeal +to nothing less than his best self, and do nothing +less than what on the whole is best for him and +for the community to which he and we both belong. +Hence, whether we give or withhold what +he specifically asks (and Love enlightened by +modern sociology tells us we usually must withhold +from beggars and tramps what they ask), in +either case we shall not consult merely our per<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">[Pg 237]</a></span>sonal +convenience and impulse, but do what we +should wish to have done to us, for the sake of society +and for our own good as members of society, +if we were in his unfortunate plight. "Ye have +heard that it was said, An eye for an eye, and a +tooth for a tooth; but I say unto you, Resist not +him that is evil, but whosoever smiteth thee on thy +right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any +man would go to law with thee, and take away thy +coat, let him have thy cloak also. And whosoever +shall compel thee to go one mile, go with him +twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him +that would borrow of thee turn not thou away."</p> + +<p>Love is kind to the evil and vicious, and magnanimous +to the hostile and hateful. Kindness +in return for favours received or in hope of favours +to come; kindness to those whose conduct and +character we admire, is all very well in its way, +but is no sign whatever that he who is kind on +these easy terms is a true child of Love. To +share the great Love of God one must go out +freely to all, regardless of return or desert,—be +impartial as sunshine and shower.</p> + +<p>When our enemy is plotting to harm us, to +break down our good name, to injure those whom +we love, even while we defend ourselves and our +dear ones against his malice and meanness, we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">[Pg 238]</a></span> +must be secretly watching our chances to do him +a good turn, and win him from hatred to Love. +Nothing less than this complete identification with +the interests of all the persons we in any way +touch, however bad some of their acts, however +unworthy some of their traits, can make us sharers +and receivers, agents and bestowers of that perfect +Love which is at once the nature of God, the +capacity of man, the fulfilment of law, and the +condition of social well-being.</p> + +<p>"Ye have heard that it was said, Thou shalt +love thy neighbor, and hate thy enemy; but I +say unto you, Love your enemies, and pray for +them that persecute you, that ye may be sons +of your Father which is in heaven; for he maketh +his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sendeth +rain on the just and the unjust. For if ye love +them that love you, what reward have ye? do not +even the publicans the same? And if ye salute +your brethren only, what do ye more than others? +do not even the Gentiles the same? Ye therefore +shall be perfect, as your heavenly Father is +perfect."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_239" id="Page_239">[Pg 239]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>III<br /> +THE COUNTERFEITS OF LOVE</h4> + +<p>Just because Love is so costly, it has a host of +counterfeits. These counterfeits are chiefly devices +for gaining the rewards and honours of Love, +without the effort and sacrifice of loving. One of +the most obvious rewards of Love is being thought +kind, generous, good. But this can be secured, +apparently, by professing religion, joining the +church, repeating the creed, giving money to the +poor, subscribing large sums to good causes,—all +of which are much cheaper and easier than +being kind, and true, and faithful, and considerate +in the home, on the farm, in the factory, in the +store. Yet Jesus tells us that unless we have +Love in the close and intimate relations of our +domestic, economic, social, and political life, all +symbols of its presence elsewhere, all "services" +directed otherwise, become intolerable nuisances, +whose places would be better filled, and whose +work better done, if they were once well out of the +way and decently buried. All this, however, is +not to deny, but by contrast to affirm, the great +indispensable uses of symbols, officers, and institutions +that are genuinely and effectively devoted to +the cultivation and propagation of Love.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">[Pg 240]</a></span></p> + +<p>The pure gold of the Spirit is most conveniently +and effectually circulated when mixed with the +alloy of rites, ceremonies, creeds, officers, and +organisations. Though no essential part of the +pure Gospel, yet these forms and observances, +these bishops and clergy, these covenants and confessions, +are as practically useful for the maintenance +and spread of the Christian Spirit as courts +and constitutions, governors and judges, are for +the orderly conduct of the state. Their authority +is founded on their practical utility. When their +utility ceases, when they come to obscure rather +than reveal the Spirit they are intended to express, +then schism and reformation serve the same beneficent +purpose in the church that declarations +of independence and revolution have so often +achieved in the state. That form of church government +is best which in any given age and society +works best; and this may well be concentrated +personal authority in one set of circumstances, +and democratic representative administration in +another. Each has its advantages and its disadvantages.</p> + +<p>Modes of worship rest on the same practical +basis. Spontaneous prayer or elaborate ritual, +much or little participation by the people, long +or short sermons, prayer-meetings or no prayer-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">[Pg 241]</a></span>meetings,—all +are to be determined by the test of +practical experience. It is absurd to profess to +draw hard and fast rules about these matters from +the precept or practice of Jesus and His Apostles, +or the early church fathers, working as they did +under conditions so widely different from our +own. Probably centralised authority and elaborate +ritual are most effective when bishops and priests +can be found who will not abuse their power for +their own aggrandisement. Until then, more +democratic forms of worship and of government +are doubtless more expedient. The friendly competition +of the two systems side by side helps to +keep sacerdotalism modest and make independency +effective.</p> + +<p>Creeds likewise have their practical usefulness, +especially in times of theological ferment and transition, +serving the purposes of party platforms in +a political campaign. But it is the grossest perversion +of their function to make assent to them +obligatory on all who wish to enjoy the most intimate +Christian fellowship, or to test Christian character +by their formulas. One might as well refuse +citizenship to every person who could not assent to +every word in some party platform or other. The +creed is an intellectual formulation of the results +of Christian experience, interpreting the Christian<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">[Pg 242]</a></span> +revelation; and it will vary from age to age with +ripening experience, and maturer views of the +content of the revelation. No creed was altogether +false at the time of its formulation. No +creed in Christendom is such as every intelligent +Christian can honestly assent to. The attempt to +make creed subscription a test of church membership, +or even a condition of ministerial standing, is +sure to confuse intellectual and spiritual things to +the serious disadvantage of both. The most sensitively +honest men will more and more decline to +enter the service of the church, until subscription +to antiquated formulas, long since become incredible +to the majority of well-trained scholars, ceases +to be required either literally or "for substance of +doctrine." It is sufficient that each candidate for +the ministry be asked to make his own statement, +either in his own words or in the words of any +creed he finds acceptable, leaving it for his brethren +to decide whether or not such intellectual +statement is consistent with that spiritual service +which is to be his chief concern. Unless Christianity, +in the persons of its leaders as well as of +its laity, can breathe as free an intellectual atmosphere +as that of Stoic or Epicurean, Plato or Aristotle, +it will at this point prove itself their inferior. +Infinitely superior as it is in every other respect,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">[Pg 243]</a></span> +it is a burning shame that its timid and conservative +modern adherents should endeavour, at this +point of absolute intellectual openness and integrity, +to place it at a disadvantage with the least +noble of its ancient competitors. The pure Spirit +of Love will win the devotion of all honest hearts +and candid minds. But the insistence on these +antiquated formulas is sure to repel an increasing +number of the most thoughtful and enlightened +from organised Christian fellowship. The only +serious reason for preferring the independent to +the hierarchical forms of church organisation at +the present time is the tendency of the latter to +keep up these forms of intellectual imposition and +imposture. Until the church as a whole shall rise +to the standards of intellectual honesty now universally +prevalent in the world of secular science, +the mission of the independent protest will remain +but partially fulfilled. "Ye are the salt of the +earth; but if the salt have lost its savour, wherewith +shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for +nothing, but to be cast out and trodden under foot +of men."</p> + +<p>Any thought of the reputation or respectability +or honour a right act will bring, just because it puts +something else in place of Love, destroys the +rightness of the act and the righteousness of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">[Pg 244]</a></span> +doer. Righteousness will always remain a dry, +dreary, forbidding, impossible thing until we welcome +right as the service of those whom we love, +and the promotion of interests we share with them; +and shrink from wrong as what harms them and +defeats our common ends. Without Love, righteousness +either dries up into a cold, hard asceticism, +or evaporates into a hollow, formal respectability; +and in one way or the other misses the +spontaneity and expansion of soul which is Love's +crown and joy. "Take heed that ye do not your +righteousness before men, to be seen of them: +else ye have no reward of your Father which is in +heaven."</p> + +<p>Love is too intent on its objects to be aware of +itself or call attention to its own operations. The +air of doing a favour takes all the Love out of an +act; for Love gives so simply and quietly that it +seems to ask rather than bestow the favour. In +this way both giver and receiver together share +Love's distinctive reward of two lives bound together +as one in the common Love of the Father.</p> + +<p>"When therefore thou doest alms, sound not a +trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the +synagogues and in the streets, that they may have +glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have +received their reward. But when thou doest alms,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">[Pg 245]</a></span> +let not thy left hand know what thy right hand +doeth, that thine alms may be in secret; and thy +Father which seeth in secret shall recompense +thee."</p> + +<p>Professed Love, if unfruitful or pernicious, is +false. If we make no one happier; help no one +over hard places; bind no wounds; comfort no +sorrows; serve no just cause; do no good work; +still worse, if we make any one's lot harder; add +to his burden or sorrow; corrupt public officials; +break down beneficent institutions; plunder the +poor, even if within technical legal forms; drive +the weak to the wall; and connive in the perversion +of justice,—then the absence of good fruits, or +the presence of bad ones, is proof positive that we +have never seen or known Love, that our profession +of Love is a lie, our proper place is with +Love's foes, and our destiny with the doers of +evil.</p> + +<p>"Beware of false prophets, which come to you +in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravening +wolves. By their fruits ye shall know them. Do +men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? +Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; +but the corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A +good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can +a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">[Pg 246]</a></span> +that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, +and cast into the fire. Therefore by their fruits +ye shall know them. Not every one that saith +unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom +of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father +which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that +day, Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy by thy name, +and by thy name cast out devils, and by thy name +do many mighty works? And then will I profess +unto them, I never knew you; depart from me, ye +that work iniquity."</p> + +<p>Neither eloquent speech nor elegant writing, +neither ornate ceremonial nor orthodox symbol, +nor anything short of actual toil to serve human +need and help human joy can translate Love into +life. Though the most beautiful idea in the world, +the mere idea of Love is of no more value than +any other mere idea. If it fails of expression in +hard, costly deeds, its ritualistic or verbal profession +is a sham. In Love's service, so far as things +done are concerned, there is no high or low, first +or last. To preach sermons and conduct religious +services, to teach science in the university, or +make laws in Congress, is no better and no +worse than to make shoes in the shoeshop or cook +food in the kitchen. All work done in Love +counts, stands, endures. All work done in vanity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">[Pg 247]</a></span> +and self-seeking, all work shirked with pretence +of religion, or excuse of wealth, or pride of social +station, leaves the soul hard, hollow, unreal, and +fails to stand Love's searching test.</p> + +<p>"Every one therefore which heareth these words +of mine, and doeth them, shall be likened unto a +wise man, which built his house upon a rock; and +the rain descended, and the floods came, and the +winds blew, and beat upon that house, and it fell +not, for it was founded upon the rock. And every +one that heareth these words of mine, and doeth +them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, +which built his house upon the sand; and the rain +descended, and the floods came, and the winds +blew, and smote upon that house, and it fell; +and great was the fall thereof."</p> + + +<h4>IV<br /> +THE WHOLE-HEARTEDNESS OF LOVE</h4> + +<p>Love asks for the whole heart or nothing; and +all the heart has, be it little or much, must go +with it. The pursuit or possession of wealth, as +an end in itself, or a means to mere selfish ends, +will drive Love out of the soul.</p> + +<p>All the wealth we can give to Love's service is +most useful and welcome; but the retention of any<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">[Pg 248]</a></span> +for miserly pride, or vain ostentation, or indolent +uselessness for ourselves or our children, fills the +heart so full of self that Love can find there no +room. Not that giving away all one has is essential +or desirable; but that every dollar one gives, +spends, keeps, invests, or controls be held subject +to the orders of Love.</p> + +<p>Wealth is not so essential to the Christian as it +was to Epicurus and Aristotle, for God can be +glorified and man can be served with very little +furniture of fortune; and therefore the Christian is +able, in whatsoever material state he is, therewith +to be content. On the other hand, the Christian +cares more for money than either the Stoic or +Plato; for there are ranges in God's universe +of beauty, truth, and goodness which cannot be +æsthetically appreciated and artistically and scientifically +appropriated without large expenditure of +labour and the wealth by which labour is supported; +and there are wide spheres of business enterprise +and social service essential to human welfare +which only the rich man or nation can effectively +promote. Divine and human service is possible in +poverty; it is more effective and at the same time +more difficult in wealth. The Christian rich and +the Christian poor serve the same Lord, and have +the same Spirit; but the accomplishment of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">[Pg 249]</a></span> +Christian rich man can be so much greater than +that of the Christian widow with her mite, that the +Christian who is strong enough to stand it is in +duty bound to treat money as a talent which in +all just ways he ought to multiply. On the contrary, +the moment it begins to make him less sympathetic, +less generous, less thankful, less responsible, +he must give it away as the only alternative +to the loss of his soul, the deterioration of his +personality.</p> + +<p>"Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon the +earth, where moth and rust doth consume, and +where thieves break through and steal; but lay up +for yourselves treasure in heaven, where neither +moth nor rust doth consume, and where thieves +do not break through nor steal, for where thy +treasure is, there will thy heart be also."</p> + +<p>Toward science and art, business and politics, +the application of the Christian Spirit is different +from anything we have met before. The Christian +will not shirk these things, like the Epicurean and +the Stoic; because they are ways of serving that +truth, beauty, welfare, and order which are included +in the Father's will for all His human children. +In all these things we are co-workers with +God for the good of man. Diligence and enthusiasm, +devotion and self-sacrifice in one or more of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">[Pg 250]</a></span> +these directions is the imperative duty, the inestimable +privilege of every one who would be a grateful +and obedient son of God, a helpful and efficient +brother to his fellow-men.</p> + +<p>Yet in all his devotion to science or art, in all +the energy with which he gives himself to business +or politics, the Christian can never forget +that God is greater than any one of these points +at which we come in contact with Him; and that, +when we have done our utmost in one or another +of these lines, we are still comparatively unprofitable +servants in His vast household. As God is +more than the thing at which we work, so the +Christian, through relation to Him, is always more +than his work. He never lets his personality become +absorbed and evaporated in the work he +does; but ever renews his personal life at the +fountain which is behind the special work he undertakes +to do. Thus the true Christian is never +without some useful social work to do; and he +never lets himself get lost in doing it. To keep +this balance of energy in the task and elevation +above it, which enables one to take success without +elation and bear failure without depression, is +perhaps the crowning achievement of practical +Christianity.</p> + +<p>"The lamp of the body is the eye; if therefore<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">[Pg 251]</a></span> +thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of +light. But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body +shall be full of darkness. If, therefore, the light +that is in thee be darkness, how great is the darkness! +No man can serve two masters; for either +he will hate the one, and love the other, or else he +will hold to one, and despise the other. Ye cannot +serve God and mammon."</p> + +<p>He who heartily loves and serves others will +trust Love in God and his fellows to take proper +care of himself. One who really loves others will +take reasonable care not to be a burden to them, +and to the world, and will avail himself of the +insurance company, the savings bank, and the +bond market as the devices of a complex modern +society to distribute losses and conserve gains to +the common advantage of all. Love does not +make the individual or his family a parasite on the +economy and industry of society. Love makes a +man bear his own permanent burden as a preliminary +to being of much use and no harm to +his family, his friends, and his community. Such +prudent provision of the means of Love's independence +and service is consistent with entire +absence of worry about one's personal fortunes. +The essential question which Love, and Jesus as +the Lord and Master of Love, puts to a man is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">[Pg 252]</a></span> +not "How much money have you?" but "What +use do you intend to make of whatever you have, +be that little or much?" If that aim is selfish, +and the money is either saved or spent in sordid, +worried selfishness, that low aim makes the money +a curse. If held subject to whatever drafts Love +may make upon it,—whether gifts to the poor, or +support of good causes, or employment of honest +workmen, or development of industrial enterprises, +be the form Love's drafts take,—then all wealth so +held is a blessing to the world and an honour to its +owner, a glory to God and a service to man.</p> + +<p>"Therefore I say unto you, Be not anxious +for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall +drink, nor yet for your body, what ye shall put +on. Is not the life more than the food, and the +body than the raiment? Behold the birds of the +heaven, that they sow not, neither do they reap, +nor gather into barns; and your heavenly Father +feedeth them. Are not ye of much more value +than they? And which of you by being anxious +can add one cubit unto his stature? And why +are ye anxious concerning raiment? Consider the +lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, +neither do they spin; yet I say unto you, that +even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed +like one of these. But if God doth so clothe the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">[Pg 253]</a></span> +grass of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow +is cast into the oven, shall he not much more +clothe you, O ye of little faith? Be not therefore +anxious, saying, What shall we eat? or, What +shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be +clothed? For after all these things do the Gentiles +seek; for your heavenly Father knoweth that +ye have need of all these things."</p> + +<p>Though material means sought as ends are fatal +to Love, Love's ends kept in view insure needed +means. To worry about to-morrow is to fail in +devotion to the tasks of to-day, and so spoil both +days. To do our best work to-day is to gain +power for to-morrow. Competition complicates, +but does not render insoluble, the problem of +making all that we have and all that we do express +Love to all whom our action affects. To +be sure, there are city slums, uninsured accidents +and sickness, unsanitary tenements, unjust +conditions of labour, where even the service of +Love does not bring to the worker appropriate +means and rewards; but it is because Love has +not quite kept pace at these points with swift-moving +modern conditions. But public spirit, +political progress, economic reform, are more +sensitive to these violations of its laws than ever +before, and eagerly bent on finding and applying<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">[Pg 254]</a></span> +the remedy,—more Love of all for each, and each +for all.</p> + +<p>"But seek ye first his kingdom, and his +righteousness, and all these things shall be +added unto you. Be not therefore anxious for +the morrow, for the morrow will be anxious for +itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."</p> + +<p>Love throws off all that hampers its action, as +a runner his coat for a race. Love requires the +sound body, the clear mind, the strong will, the +sensitive heart, and foregoes all indulgences that +impair these things, though in themselves innocent +as eating and drinking. Yet Love makes +no fuss about its sacrifices, takes them as a +simple matter of course, not worth mentioning; +for what Love gives up in mere sensuous indulgence +is as nothing to the widened affections and +enlarged interests gained. To be solemn or sad +over what we give up, to proclaim or parade +one's self-denials, would be an insult to Love; +it would show that the persons we love and the +causes we serve are not really as dear to our +hearts as the pitiful things we forego for their +sake—would show that our Love was a sham.</p> + +<p>All pleasure that comes from healthy exercise +of body, rational exercise of mind, sympathetic +expansion of the affections, strenuous effort of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">[Pg 255]</a></span> +the will, in just and generous living, is at the +same time a glorifying of God and an enrichment +of ourselves. All pleasure which sacrifices +the vigour of the body to the indulgence of some +separate appetite, all pleasure which enslaves or +degrades or embitters the persons from whom it +is procured, all pleasure which breaks down the +sacred institutions on which society is founded,—is +shameful and debasing, a sin against God, and a +wrong to our own souls. The Christian will forego +many pleasures which Epicurus and even Aristotle +would permit, because he is infinitely more +sensitive than they to the effect his pleasures +have on poor men and unprotected women whose +welfare these earlier teachers did not take into +account. On the other hand, the Christian will +enter heartily into the joys of pure domestic life, +and the delights of struggle with untoward social +and political conditions, from which Plato and the +Stoics thought it honourable to withdraw. Where +God can be glorified and men can be served, +there the Christian will either find his pleasure, +or with optimistic art, create a pleasure that he +does not find.</p> + +<p>"Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, +of a sad countenance; for they disfigure +their faces, that they may be seen of men to fast.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">[Pg 256]</a></span> +Verily I say unto you, They have received their +reward. But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thy +head, and wash thy face, that thou be not seen of +men to fast, but of thy Father which is in secret; +and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall recompense +thee."</p> + +<p>Just because Love includes the interests of all +the persons we deal with, it excludes all mean, +selfish traits from our hearts. There can be no +pride and guile, no lust and cruelty, no avarice +and hypocrisy, no malice and censoriousness, in +a heart which welcomes to its interest and affection, +and serves and loves as its own, the aims +and needs of its fellows. That is why Love's true +disciples are few, and the slaves of selfishness +many. Ask how many,—not entirely succeed, +for none do,—but how many make it the constant +aim of their lives to treat others as more +widely extended aspects of themselves, and, in +order to do that, endeavour to keep out all the +greed, hate, lust, pride, envy, jealousy, that would +draw lines between self and others, and we see +the answer: that the way must be narrow, a +way few find, and still fewer follow when found.</p> + +<p>"Enter ye in by the narrow gate; for wide is +the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to +destruction, and many be they that enter in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">[Pg 257]</a></span> +thereby. For narrow is the gate, and straitened +the way, that leadeth unto life, and few be they +that find it."</p> + + +<h4>V<br /> +THE CULTIVATION OF LOVE</h4> + +<p>Love is so akin to our nature, so eager to enter +our souls, that to want is to get it; to seek is to +find it; to open our hearts to its presence is to +discover it already there. Whoever knows what +true prayer is—the intense, eager yearning for +good of insistent, importunate hearts—knows that +there never was and never can be one unanswered +prayer. No man who has longed to have Love +the law of his life, and struggled for it as a miser +struggles for money, or a politician strives to win +votes, ever failed to get what he wanted. For +every person we meet gives occasion for Love, +and every situation in life affords a chance to +express it. The difficulty is not to get all we want, +but to want all we can have for the asking.</p> + +<p>"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye +shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto +you, for every one that asketh receiveth; and he +that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it +shall be opened. Or what man is there of you,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">[Pg 258]</a></span> +who, if his son shall ask him for a loaf, will give +him a stone, or if he shall ask for a fish, will give +him a serpent? If ye then, being evil, know how +to give good gifts unto your children, how much +more shall your Father which is in heaven give +good things to them that ask him?"</p> + +<p>Love will not grow in our hearts without deep, +unseen communion with the Spirit of Love, who +is God. To dwell reverently on the Infinite Love; +to keep in one's heart a sacred place where His +holy name is adored; to eagerly seek for Love's +coming in our own hearts, in the hearts of all +men, and in all the affairs of the world; to gratefully +receive all material blessings as gifts for use +in Love's service; to beseech for ourselves and +bestow on others that forgiveness which is Love's +attitude toward our human frailties and failings; +to fortify ourselves in advance against the allurements +of sense, and the base desire to gain good +for ourselves at cost of evil to others; to remember +that all right rule, all true strength, all worthy +honour inhere in and flow from Love, and Love's +Father, God,—to do this day by day sincerely and +simply without formality or ostentation,—this is to +pray, and to insure prayer's inevitable answer—a +life through which Love freely flows to bless both +the world and ourselves.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">[Pg 259]</a></span></p> + +<p>"And when ye pray, ye shall not be as the +hypocrites, for they love to stand and pray in +the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, +that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto +you, They have received their reward. But thou, +when thou prayest, enter into thine inner chamber, +and having shut thy door, pray to thy Father +which is in secret, and thy Father which seeth in +secret shall recompense thee. And in praying use +not vain repetitions, as the Gentiles do; for they +think that they shall be heard for their much +speaking. Be not therefore like unto them; for +your Father knoweth what things ye have need +of, before ye ask him. After this manner therefore +pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, +Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. +Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth. Give +us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our +debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. And +bring us not into temptation, but deliver us from +the evil one."</p> + +<p>Our only ground of assurance that Love forgives +us is our loving forgiveness of others. In +the light of that fact of experience it is easy and +obvious to believe that the Father whose children +we are, is not less loving and forgiving than we. +If we restore to our esteem and friendship those<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">[Pg 260]</a></span> +who have wronged us, then we are sure that Love +at the heart of the Universe, Love in the Father, +Love in all the Father's true children, fully and +freely forgives us. If we have this experience of +our own forgiveness of our fellows, we know that +Love would not be Love, but hate, God would +not be God, but a devil, if any sincerely repented +wrong or shortcoming of which we have been +guilty could remain unforgiven.</p> + +<p>"For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your +heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if ye +forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your +Father forgive your trespasses."</p> + +<p>To judge harshly another man's failings, however +bad they may be, shows that we are less +loving than he. For he may have failed through +strength of appetite, or heat of passion,—failings +that are still consistent with Love; but harsh +judgment has no such excuse, and is therefore +a deadly—that is, loveless—sin. We would +never think of proclaiming to the idly curious or +the coldly critical the failings of one whom we +love; hence proclamations of any one's failings +is a sure sign that we have no Love for him, +and as long as there are any whom we do not +love and protect, we have no part or lot in the +great Love of God. Yet such charitableness does<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">[Pg 261]</a></span> +not forbid our practical judgment of the difference +between sheep and wolves, good men and +bad, when important issues are involved. That +Love requires. What it forbids is the rolling +as a sweet morsel under our tongue, and the gleeful +recital to others, of the mistake or the sin +of another, as something in which we take mean +delight because we think it makes him inferior to +ourselves.</p> + +<p>"Judge not that ye be not judged. For with +what judgement ye judge, ye shall be judged, and +with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured +unto you. And why beholdest thou the mote +that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not +the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt +thou say to thy brother, Let me cast out the +mote out of thine eye, and lo, the beam is in +thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first +the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt +thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy +brother's eye."</p> + +<p>Love will waste no time trying to explain itself +to the selfish. If Love does not commend +itself by its own light and warmth to a man, no +forms of words can make him understand it. The +sensual, the greedy, the hard, and the cruel Love +will treat as gently and kindly as circumstances<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">[Pg 262]</a></span> +permit; yet expect as a matter of course that they +will interpret Love's justice as hardness, kindness +as weakness, temperance as asceticism, forbearance +as cowardice, sacrifice as stupidity. Those who +love will not mind being misunderstood by those +who do not; knowing that any attempted explanation +would only increase their conceit and hardness +of heart, and so make a bad matter worse.</p> + +<p>"Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, +neither cast your pearls before the swine, lest haply +they trample them under their feet, and turn and +rend you."</p> + +<p>Since Love is "the greatest thing in the world," +we are bound to stand ready with girt loins, and +trimmed, burning lamps, to shed its light far and +wide. To cover it up would be to deprive ourselves +and our fellows of the one sight in all the +world best worth seeing, and so to hinder its +spread. False modesty that would keep Love's +good works out of sight is as bad as false pride +that would thrust oneself forward. Though works +done merely to be seen are not good at all, yet +good works genuinely done for Love's sake gain +added influence and lustre when frankly and freely +allowed to be seen as the beautiful things that they +are. The Christian is under spiritual compulsion +to be a missionary. Other systems draw their little<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">[Pg 263]</a></span> +circles of disciples about them, as Jesus drew His +twelve. One cannot hold what he believes to be +a true and helpful view of life without wishing to +communicate it to others. Yet this tendency, +which is natural to every principle, is characteristic +of Christianity in a unique degree. For the Christian +Spirit consists in Love, the desire to give to +others the best one has. And what can be so +good, so desirable to impart, as this very Spirit of +Love, which is Christianity itself? That is why +the Christian must, in some form or other,—by +journeying to foreign lands, by contribution to missionary +work at home, by gifts to Christian education, +by support of settlement work, or perhaps +best of all by the silent diffusion of a Christian +example in the neighbourhood, or the unnoticed +expression of the Christian Spirit in the home,—be +a propagator of the Spirit of Love he has himself +received.</p> + +<p>"Ye are the light of the world. A city set on +a hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a lamp +and put it under the bushel, but on the stand; and +it shineth unto all that are in the house. Even so +let your light shine before men, that they may see +your good works, and glorify your Father which is +in heaven."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">[Pg 264]</a></span></p> + + +<h4>VI<br /> +THE BLESSEDNESS OF LOVE</h4> + +<p>Does virtue bring happiness? is a question every +philosophy of life must meet. Yet before it can +be rightly answered it must be rightly put.</p> + +<p>For if by virtue you mean something negative, +conventional,—not lying, not cheating, not swearing, +not drinking; and if by happiness you mean +something passive, external,—riches, offices, entertainments, +and honours; then virtue and happiness +do not necessarily go together in life, and no +philosophy can show that they should.</p> + +<p>If a man were to persuade himself that they do +go together, and should seek this sort of happiness +by cultivating this sort of virtue, he would +miss true virtue and true happiness. For both +virtue and happiness are positive, active; so interrelated +that the happiness must be found in that +furtherance of our common social interests in which +the exercise of virtue consists.</p> + +<p>Jesus bids us take an active, devoted interest in +the interests of others and of society. Now whoever +shares and serves a wide range of interests +has an interested, and therefore an interesting, life. +But the interesting life is the happy life. Love, +whether it has much or little wealth and station,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">[Pg 265]</a></span> +always has interests and aims; always finds or +makes friends to share them,—in other words, is +always happy.</p> + +<p>The beatitudes are illustrations of this deep +identity between interest taken and happiness +found; statements of the truth that Love going +out to serve and share the interests and aims of +others, and blessedness flowing in to fill the heart +thereby enlarged for its reception, are the outside +and inside of the same spiritual experience.</p> + +<p>To think little of self is the key to the joy that +goes with much thought for others.</p> + +<p>Love is so going out to others as to make +them as real as self. But that is what no man +puffed up with self-importance can do. Where +self is much in the foreground others are pushed +to the rear. Self-importance and Love cannot +dwell together in the same house of clay. As +one goes up in the scales of the balance the other +goes down. To be rich in the shared lives of +others one must be poor in his own self-esteem. +The two are in inverse proportion. Modesty is +impossible of direct cultivation. It isn't safe to +talk or even think about it much. As Pascal +remarks, "Few people talk of humility humbly." +Like Love it is the manifestation of something +deeper than itself. Unless one is in intimate per<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">[Pg 266]</a></span>sonal +relations with one whom he reveres as +greater, stronger, better than himself, it is obviously +impossible for him to be modest. If he is in +such relations, it is equally impossible for him not +to be modest. Hence, as Love is the inmost +quality of the Christian, the inevitable manifestation +to his fellow-men of what the Father is to him, +so modesty is the surest outward sign of this inward +grace. Conceit is a public proclamation of +the poverty of one's personal relations. For if this +conceited fellow, this vain woman, really had the +honour of the intimate acquaintance of some one +better and greater than their petty, miserable +selves, they could not possibly be the vain, conceited +creatures that they are. Every one who +lives in the presence of the great Father, and +walks in the company of His glorious Son, is sure +to find modesty and humility the natural and +spontaneous expression of his side of these great +relationships. "Blessed are the poor in spirit; for +theirs is the kingdom of heaven."</p> + +<p>Our shortcomings frankly confessed prepare us +for Love's consolation.</p> + +<p>We all fall short of that patient consideration, +that courteous kindliness, which makes the feelings +and interests of others as precious as our own. +Some of us fail in one way, some in another.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">[Pg 267]</a></span> +But we all are unprofitable servants of the Love +that would make our lives one with all the lives +that we touch. To forget or deny that we fail is +to lose sight of Love altogether. He who thinks +he succeeds thereby shows that he fails; he who +knows and laments that he fails comes as near as +man can to the goal.</p> + +<p>Love neither asks nor expects a clean record; +else it would have no disciples. Love fully and +freely forgives, at the eleventh hour welcomes +the idler, and offers its fulness of joy to all who, +whatever their repented past may have been, make +service and kindness to others their eager present +concern. For no sin frankly confessed, no wrong +deed sincerely repented, no loss squarely met, no +bereavement bravely endured, can shut out from +Love's consolation those who serve with the best +there is in them the persons who still need their +aid. "Blessed are they that mourn; for they shall +be comforted."</p> + +<p>To meet criticism with kindness, crossness with +geniality, insult with courtesy, and injury with +charity is the way to conquer the world.</p> + +<p>By nature we are creatures of suggestion. A +hateful look, an ugly word, a spiteful sneer, a +cruel blow, make us hateful and ugly and spiteful +and cruel in turn. For the empty heart flashes<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">[Pg 268]</a></span> +back in resentment whatever attitude another's +act suggests.</p> + +<p>Meekness greets as a friend the just critic, and +for unjust and unkind treatment makes allowance +as due to the blindness or hardness or weakness of +the pitiful person who has nothing better to give. +Meekness makes the soft answer that turns away +wrath, and treats one who wrongs us all the more +gently. Thus the meekness of Love gives both +power to possess our own souls in patience under +all provocation, and power, not indeed to coerce +the bodies of others, but to win the consent of +their souls. "Blessed are the meek; for they shall +inherit the earth."</p> + +<p>Righteousness is something of which we can +have no more and no less than we wish.</p> + +<p>He who is good enough is not good at all, and +never will be any better. For righteousness is +right relation to others; and so long as there are +things we can do to help others, its infinite task is +unfinished. Yet though the goal ever advances +and never comes within reach, aspiration is achievement; +progress is attainment. If we could come +to the end of our journey; if we could see the +world's claims on us met, the deeds of which we +are capable done, that moment would mark the +death of our souls. Just because Love grows by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">[Pg 269]</a></span> +loving and serving, and makes ever greater and +greater demands, it prophesies there shall be forever +and ever things to do that will make life +worth while. "Blessed are they that hunger and +thirst after righteousness; for they shall be +filled."</p> + +<p>The depth of our sympathy for those below us +in secular service and station measures our worth +in the eyes of those spiritually higher than we.</p> + +<p>Love is like a tree; if it is not to be scorched in +the blaze of ambition and withered in the heat of +competition, its roots of sympathy must go down +as deep into the soil of the obscure and lowly lives +on whose humble toil we depend as its branches +spread into the upper air of social distinction and +station.</p> + +<p>Unless we have much sympathy for those who +toil on the farm and on the sea, in the factory and +the mine, behind the counter and the desk, in the +kitchen and laundry, what we call courtesy in the +drawing room, or charity on the platform, is hollow +mockery and Pharisaic sham. "Blessed are the +merciful; for they shall obtain mercy."</p> + +<p>In order for Love to shine through them there +must be nothing else in our hearts.</p> + +<p>Love demands everything or nothing. It refuses +to dwell in quarters or halves of our souls. The<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">[Pg 270]</a></span> +least flaw of pride, greed, or lust is enough to +make them opaque. Greed, lust, pride, hate, so +blind our eyes to the real selves of others that we +cannot see or treat them as they really are; that is, +cannot love them. It reduces them to mere means +and tools of our passions and pleasures; and one +who so regards persons can never love either them +or any person aright. Only the pure can see Love; +for only the pure can experience that union of one's +whole self with the whole self of others in which +Love consists. "Blessed are the pure in heart; +for they shall see God."</p> + +<p>Just so sure as we love two or more persons we +shall do all in our power to keep them from hating +each other.</p> + +<p>We wish everyone to love those whom we love. +If anybody hates one we love, it hurts us as much +as it does the one hated, even more than it would +to be hated ourselves. And if anyone whom we +love is hating another, we are even more sorry for +him than we are for the person he hates, and +make all haste to deliver him from this most +dreadful condition. The more we love our fellows, +the more we hate to see misunderstanding, ill-will, +strife, between them.</p> + +<p>Not that the Christian is unwilling or afraid to +fight. Where deliberate wrong is arrayed against<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">[Pg 271]</a></span> +the rights of men, where fraud is practised on +the unprotected, where hypocrisy imposes on the +credulous, where vice betrays the innocent, where +inefficiency sacrifices precious human interests, +where avarice oppresses the poor, where tyranny +tramples on the weak, there the man who shares +the Father's Love for His maltreated children, the +man who walks daily in the companionship of +the Christ who owns all the downtrodden as His +brothers, will be the most fearless and uncompromising +foe of every form of injustice and +oppression. Property, reputation, position, time, +strength, influence, health, life itself if need be, +will be thrown unreservedly into the fight against +vice and sin. He cannot keep in with the Father +and with Christ and not come out in opposition to +everything that wrongs and injures the humblest +man, the lowliest woman, the most defenceless +little child.</p> + +<p>Fighting, however, is not altogether uncongenial +to the descendants of our brute progenitors. To +fight our own battles, and occasionally a few for +our neighbours, comes all too naturally to most of +us. Fighting God's battles on principle is a very +different thing. To feel entirely tranquil in the +midst of the combat; to know that we are not +alone on the side of the right; to have the real<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">[Pg 272]</a></span> +interests of our opponents at heart all the time; +to be ever ready to forgive them, and to ask their +forgiveness for any excess of zeal we may have +shown; to have the peace of God in our hearts, +and no trace of malice, in deed, or word, or thought, +or feeling,—this is not altogether natural, and +the man who does his fighting on that basis gives +pretty good assurance of dwelling in the Christian +Spirit. No other adequate provision for maintaining +peace in the midst of effective warfare, and +making peace for others as well as for ourselves +the instant the need for war is over, has ever +been devised. The peacemakers of this fearless, +earnest, strenuous type have the unmistakable +right to be called the children of God. "Blessed +are the peacemakers; for they shall be called +the children of God."</p> + +<p>All who love must expect to be hated by the +foes of those whom they love.</p> + +<p>Because Jesus loved the common people and +sought to deliver them from their fears and errors, +the men who traded on those fears and errors put +Him to an ignominious death. If we love and +serve the despised, the abused, the plundered, +those who despise and abuse and plunder them +will do to us the worst they dare. The road of +Love is marked at every turn by a cross. Who<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">[Pg 273]</a></span>ever +in business, society, or politics makes as +real as his own the interests and the wrongs of +all whom he can reach and touch, will be disliked, +criticised, misrepresented, vilified, condemned. He +will pay Love's price of persecution.</p> + +<p>Christian sacrifice closely resembles Greek temperance +and courage. There is, however, this +essential distinction. The Christian takes on not +merely the pains and privations which are essential +to his personal welfare, or the welfare of his +community or state; he takes on whatever suffering +the Father's Love for all His children calls +him to undergo; gives up whatever indulgences +the service of Christ requires him to dispense +with; adopts whatever mingling of hardship and +self-denial will keep him in most effective and +sympathetic fellowship with those who have discovered +the same great spiritual secret as himself. +Thus, though to the uninitiated outsider +much of his life looks hard and severe, on the +inside it is easy and light; for the companionship +with the Father, with Christ, and with Christian +people is so much greater and dearer than the +material and sensuous delights it may incidentally +take away, that on the inside it does not wear the +aspect of loss and sacrifice at all, but rather that +of a glory and a gain. Still, since this element<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">[Pg 274]</a></span> +of pleasant things foregone, and hard things +endured, is ever present, and since it has to +be judged by people on the outside as well as +by those on the inside of the experience, in recognition +of this truth Christianity has made its +symbol before the uninitiated world the cross. +As in the life of the Master, so in the life of +every faithful disciple, the cross must be borne, +the perpetual sacrifice must be made, as the price +of Love's presence in a world of selfishness and +hate; but the cross is transfigured into a crown +of rejoicing, the sacrifice is transformed into privilege +and pleasure by those precious personal +relationships which are the supreme glory and +gladness of the soul, and which could be maintained +on no cheaper terms. The sacrifice that +the Christian makes to get his Father's will, his +Master's mission, accomplished in the world which +so sorely needs it, is like the sacrifice a mother +makes for her sick and suffering child,—the +dearest and sweetest experience of life. The +cross thus gladly borne, the yoke of sacrifice +thus unostentatiously assumed, is the supreme +expression of the Christian Spirit.</p> + +<p>Like all high-cost things, sacrifice for Love's +sake carries a high premium. It admits, as nothing +else does, to the inner circle of the immortal<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">[Pg 275]</a></span> +lovers of their fellows, to the intimate fellowship +of the Lord of Love, Jesus Christ.</p> + +<p>Joy follows incidentally and inevitably from the +maintenance of these great Christian relationships. +A gloomy, depressed, despondent tone and temper, +unless it be demonstrably pathological, is +public proclamation that the deep mines of these +Christian relationships, with their inexhaustible +resources, are either undeveloped or unworked. +For no man who looks through sunshine and +shower, through food and raiment, through family +and friendship, through society and the moral +order of the world, up into the face of the Giver +of them all as his Father; who knows how to +summon to his side the gentle and gracious companionship +of Christ, alike in the pressure of perplexity +and in the quiet of solitude; who knows +how to unlock the treasures of Christian literature, +to appropriate the meaning of Christian worship, +and to avail himself of the comfort and support +that is always latent in the hearts of his Christian +friends,—no man in whom these vast personal +resources are developed and employed can ever +long remain disconsolate.</p> + +<p>Even in prosperity, popularity, and outward success +it takes considerable mixture of these deeper +elements to keep the tone of life constantly on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">[Pg 276]</a></span> +high level of joy. But adversity is the real test. +Then the man without these interior resources +gives way, breaks down, becomes querulous, fretful, +irritable, sour. On the other hand, the man +who can make mistakes, and take the criticism +they bring, and go on as cheerfully as if no blunder +had been made and no vote of censure had +been passed; the man who can be hated for the +good things he tries to do, and condemned for bad +things he never did and never meant to do; the +man who can work hard, and contentedly take +poverty for pay; the man who can serve devotedly +people who revile and betray him in return; +the man who can discount in advance the unpopularity, +misrepresentation, and defeat a right course +will cost, and then resolutely set about it; the man +who takes persecution and treachery as serenely +as other men take honours and emoluments,—this +man, we may be sure, has dug deep an +invested heavily in the field where the priceless +Christian treasure lies concealed.</p> + +<p>"Blessed are they that have been persecuted for +righteousness' sake; for theirs is the Kingdom of +Heaven. Blessed are ye when men shall reproach +you, and persecute you, and say all manner of evil +against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and +be exceeding glad; for great is your reward in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">[Pg 277]</a></span> +heaven; for so persecuted they the prophets +which were before you."</p> + + +<h4>VII<br /> +THE SUPREMACY OF LOVE</h4> + +<p>Jesus' Spirit of Love is capable of absorbing +into itself whatever we have found valuable in the +four previous systems.</p> + +<p>The Epicurean's varied and spontaneous joy in +life is not diminished, but enhanced, by the Christian +Spirit, which multiplies this joy as many times +as there are persons whom one knows and loves. +The Epicurean lives in the little world of himself, +and a few equally self-centred companions. The +Christian lives in the great world of God, and +shares its joys with all God's human children. It +is the absence of this larger world, the exclusive +concern for his own narrow pleasures, that makes +the consistent Epicurean, with all his polish and +charm, the essentially mean and despicable creature +we found him to be.</p> + +<p>To be sure, Mill, Spencer, and others have +endeavoured to graft the altruistic fruits of Christianity +on to the old Epicurean stock. There +is this great difference, however, between such +Christianised Epicureanism as that of Mill and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">[Pg 278]</a></span> +Spencer, and Christianity itself. These systems +have no logical bridge, no emotional bond by +which to pass from the pleasures of self to the +pleasures of others. They can and do point +out the incompleteness of merely egoistic Epicureanism; +they exhort us to care for the pleasures +of others as we do for our own. But the logical +nexus, the moral dynamic, the spiritual motive, is +lacking in these systems; and consequently these +systems fail to work, except with the few highly +altruistic souls who need no spiritual physician.</p> + +<p>This logical bond, this moral dynamic, this spiritual +motive which impels toward altruistic conduct, +the Christian finds in Christ. He certainly did +love all men, and care for their happiness as dearly +as He cared for His own. But this same Christ +is the Christian's Lord and Master and Friend. +Yet friendship for Him, the acceptance of Him +as Lord and Master, is a contradiction in terms, +unless one is at the same time willing to cultivate +His Spirit, which is the Spirit of service, the +Spirit which holds the happiness and welfare of +others just as sacred and precious as one's own. +He that hath not this Spirit of Christ is none of +His. Hence what men like Mill and Spencer +preach as a duty, and support by what their critics +have found to be very inadequate and fallacious<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">[Pg 279]</a></span> +logical processes, Christianity proclaims as a fact +in the nature of God, as embodied in Christ, and +a condition of the divine life for everyone who +desires to be a child of God, a follower and friend +of Jesus Christ. Christianity, therefore, includes +everything of value in Epicureanism, and infinitely +more. It has the Epicurean gladness without its +exclusiveness, its joy without its selfishness, its +naturalness without its baseness, its geniality without +its heartlessness.</p> + +<p>In like manner Christianity takes up all that is +true in the Stoic teaching, without falling into its +hardness and narrowness. The truth of the Stoic +teaching consisted in its power to transform into +an expression of the man himself, and of the +beneficent laws of Nature, whatever outward circumstance +might befall him, Now put in place +of the abstract self the love of the perfect Christ, +and instead of universal law the loving will of +the Father for all His children, and you have a +deepened, sweetened, softened Stoicism which is +identical with a sturdy, strenuous, and virile Christianity.</p> + +<p>If a man has in his heart the earnest desire to +be like Christ, and to do the things that help to +carry out Christ's Spirit in the world, it is absolutely +impossible that he should ever find himself<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">[Pg 280]</a></span> +in a situation where what he most desires to do +cannot be done. Now a man who in every conceivable +situation can do what he most desires to +do is as completely "master of his fate" and +"captain of his soul" as the most strenuous Stoic +ever prayed to be. And yet he is saved from the +coldness and hardness and repulsiveness of the +mere Stoic, because the object of his devotion, +the aim of his assertion, is not his own barren, +frigid, formal self, but the kindly, sympathetic, +loving Christ, whom he has chosen to be his better +self. Like the Stoic, he brings every thought into +captivity; but it is not the captivity of a prison, +the empty chamber of his individual soul, swept +and garnished; it is captivity to the most gracious +and gentle and generous person the world has +ever known,—it is captivity to Christ.</p> + +<p>When misfortune and calamity overtakes him, +he transforms it into a blessing and a discipline, +not like the mere Stoic through passive resignation +to an impersonal law, as of gravitation, or +electricity, or bacteriology, but through active +devotion to that glory of God which is to be +furthered mainly by kindness and sympathy and +service to our fellow-men. The man who has +this love of Christ in his heart, and who is devoted +to the doing of the Father's loving will, can<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">[Pg 281]</a></span> +exclaim in every untoward circumstance, "I can +do all things in Him that strengtheneth me." +He can shout with more than Stoic defiance: +"O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where +is thy victory?" In all the literature of Stoic +exultation in the face of frowning danger and +impending doom, there is nothing that can match +the splendid outburst of the great Apostle: "Who +shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall +tribulation, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, +or nakedness, or peril, or sword? Nay, in all +these things we are more than conquerors through +Him that loved us. For I am persuaded that +neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, +nor things present, nor things to come, +nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other +creature, shall be able to separate us from the +love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."</p> + +<p>Everything that we found noble, and strong, and +brave in Stoicism we find also here; the power to +transform external evil into internal good, and to +hold so tightly to our self-chosen good that no +power in earth or heaven can ever wrest it from +us,—a good so universal that the circumstance is +inconceivable in which it would fail to work. Yet +with all this tenacious, world-conquering strength, +there is, drawn from the divine Source of this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">[Pg 282]</a></span> +affection a gentleness, and sympathy, and tenderness, +and humble human helpfulness, which the +Stoic in his boastfulness, and hardness, and self-sufficiency +could never know.</p> + +<p>The Christian abhors lying and stealing, scolding +and slandering, slavery and prostitution, meanness +and murder, not less but far more than the +Stoic. But he refrains from these things, not +under constraint of abstract law, but because he +cares so deeply and sensitively for the people +whom these things affect that he cannot endure +the thought that any word or deed of his should +bring them pain or loss or shame or degradation. +Thus he gets the Stoic strength without its hardness, +the Stoic universality without its barrenness, +the Stoic exaltation without its pride, the +Stoic integrity without its formalism, the Stoic +calm without its impassiveness.</p> + +<p>Christianity is as lofty as Platonism; but it gets +its elevation by a different process. Instead of +rising above drudgery and details, it lifts them +up into a clearer atmosphere, where nothing is +servile or menial which can glorify God or serve +a fellow-man.</p> + +<p>The great truth which Plato taught was the +subordination of the lower elements in human +nature to the higher. In the application of this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">[Pg 283]</a></span> +truth, as we saw, Plato went far astray. His +highest was not attainable by every man; and +he proposed to enforce the dictates of reason by +fraud and intimidation on those incapable of comprehending +their reasonableness. Thus he was led +into that fallacy of the abstract universal which +is common to all socialistic schemes. Christianity +takes the Platonic principle of subordination of +lower to higher; but it adds a new definition to +what the higher or rather the highest is; and it +introduces a new appeal for the lowliest to become +willing servants and friends of the highest, instead +of mere constrained serfs and slaves. This +highest principle is, of course, Love of the God +who loves all His human children, friendship to +the Christ who is the friend of every man. Consequently +there are no humble working-men to +be coerced and no unfortunate women to be maltreated; +no deformed and ill-begotten children to +be exposed to early death, as in Plato's exclusive +scheme. To the Christian every child is a child of +God, every woman a sister of Christ, every man a +son of the Father, and consequently no one of +them can be disregarded in our plans of fellowship +and sympathy and service; for whoever should +dare to leave them out of his own sympathy and +love would thereby exclude himself from the Love<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">[Pg 284]</a></span> +of God, likeness to Christ, and participation in the +Christian Spirit.</p> + +<p>Thus Christianity gives us all that was wise and +just in the Platonic principle of the subordination +of the lower elements in our nature to the higher; +but its higher is so much above the highest dream +of Plato that it guards certain forms of social good +at points where, even in Plato's ideal Republic, +they were ruthlessly betrayed.</p> + +<p>Christianity finally gathers up into itself whatever +is good in the principle of Aristotle. The +Aristotelian principle was the devotion of life to +a worthy end and the selection of efficient means +for its accomplishment. On that general formula +it is impossible to improve. "To this end have +I been born, and to this end am I come into the +world," is Jesus' justification of His mission, when +questioned by Pontius Pilate. "One thing I do, +forgetting the things which are behind, and +stretching forward to the things which are before, +I press on toward the goal unto the prize +of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus," is +Paul's magnificent apology for his way of life. +The concentration of one's whole energy upon +a worthy end, and the willing acceptance of +pains, privations, and penalties which may be +incidental to the effective prosecution of that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">[Pg 285]</a></span> +end, is the comprehensive formula of every brave +and heroic life, whether it be the life of Jew or +Gentile, Greek or Christian. It is not because it +sets forth something different from this wise and +brave prosecution of a noble end that Christianity +is an improvement on the teaching of Aristotle; +it is because the end at which the Christian aims +is so much higher, and the fortitude demanded +by it is so much deeper, that Christianity has +superseded and deserves to supersede the noblest +teaching of the greatest Greeks. What was the +end which Aristotle set before himself and his +disciples? Citizenship in a city state half free +and half enslaved, with leisure for the philosophic +contemplation of the learned few, bought by the +constrained toil of the ignorant, degraded many; +the refined companionship of choice congenial +spirits for which it was expected that the multitude +would be forever incapacitated and from +which they would be forcibly excluded. Over +against this aristocracy of birth, opportunity, +leisure, training, and intelligence Jesus sets the +wide democracy of virtue, service, Love. Whoever +is capable of doing the humblest deed in +Love to God and service to man becomes thereby +a member of the kingdom of the choicest spirits to +be found in earth or heaven, and entitled to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">[Pg 286]</a></span> +same courteous and delicate consideration which +the disciple would show to his Master. The building +up of such a kingdom and the extension of its +membership to include all the nations of the earth +and all classes and conditions of men within its +happy fellowship, and in its noble service, is the +great end which Jesus set before himself and +which He invites each disciple to share.</p> + +<p>Whatever hardship and toil, whatever pain and +persecution, whatever reviling and contumely, +whatever privation and poverty may be necessary +to the accomplishment of this great end the +Master himself gladly bore, and He asks His followers +to do the same. In a world full of +hypocrisy and corruption, pride and pretence, +avarice and greed, cruelty and lust, malice and +hate, selfishness and sin, there are bound to be +many trials to be borne, much hard work to be +done, many blows to be received, much suffering +to be endured. All that is inevitable, whatever +view one takes of life. Christ, however, shows us +the way to do and bear these things cheerfully and +bravely as part of His great work of redeeming +the world from the bondage and misery of these +powers of evil, and establishing His kingdom of +Love. To keep the clear vision of that great end +before our eyes, to keep the sense of His com<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">[Pg 287]</a></span>panionship +warm and glowing within our hearty +never to lose the sense of the great liberation and +blessing this kingdom will bring to our downtrodden, +maltreated brothers and sisters in the +humbler walks of life, Jesus tells us is the secret +of that sanity and sacrifice which is able to make +the yoke of useful toil easy, and the burden of +social service light; and to transform the cross +of suffering into a crown of joy.</p> + +<p>Each of these four previous principles is valuable +and essential; and the fact that Christianity +is higher than them all, no more warrants the +Christian in dispensing with the lower elements, +than the supremacy of the roof enables it to +dispense with the foundation and the intervening +stories. Both for ourselves, and for the world +in which we live, we need to make our ideal of +personality broad and comprehensive. We need +to combine in harmonious and graceful unity the +happy Epicurean disposition to take fresh from +the hand of nature all the pleasures she innocently +offers; the strong Stoic temper that takes +complacently whatever incidental pains and ills +the path of duty may have in store for us; the +occasional Platonic mood which from time to time +shall lift us out of the details of drudgery when +they threaten to obscure the larger outlook of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">[Pg 288]</a></span> +the soul; the shrewd Aristotelian insight which +weighs the worth of transient impulses and passing +pleasures in the impartial scales of intellectual +and social ends; and then, not as a thing apart, +but rather as the crown and consummation of +all these other elements, the generous Christian +Spirit, which makes the joys and sorrows, the +aims and interests, of others as precious as one's +own, and sets the Will of God which includes +the good of all His creatures high above all lesser +aims, as the bond that binds them all together in +the unity of a personal life which is in principle +perfect with some faint approximation to the +divine perfection.</p> + +<p>The omission of any truth for which the other +ancient systems stood mutilates and impoverishes +the Christian view of life. Ascetic Puritanism, for +instance, is Christianity minus the truth taught by +Epicurus. Sentimental liberalism is Christianity +without the Stoic note. Dogmatic orthodoxy is +Christianity sadly in need of Plato's search-light +of sincerity. Sacerdotal ecclesiasticism is Christianity +that has lost the Aristotelian disinterestedness +of devotion to intellectual and social ends +higher and wider than its own institutional +aggrandisement.</p> + +<p>The time is ripe for a Christianity which shall<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">[Pg 289]</a></span> +have room for all the innocent joys of sense and +flesh, of mind and heart, which Epicurus taught us +to prize aright, yet shall have the Stoic strength +to make whatever sacrifice of them the universal +good requires; which shall purge the heart of +pride and pretence by questionings of motive as +searching as those of Plato, and at the same time +shall hold life to as strict accountability for practical +usefulness and social progress as Aristotle's +doctrines of the end and the mean require. It is +by some such world-wide, historical approach, and +the inclusion of whatever elements of truth and +worth other systems have separately emphasised, +that we shall reach a Christianity that is really +catholic.</p> + +<p>To take the duties and trials, the practical problems +and personal relationships of life up into the +atmosphere of Love, so that what we do and how +we treat people becomes the resultant, not of the +outward situation and our natural appetites and +passions, but of the outward situation and Love +within our hearts,—this is what it means to live +in the Christian Spirit; this is the essence of Christianity. +Strengthened character and straightened +conduct are sure to follow the maintenance of this +spiritual relationship. Not that it will transform +one's hereditary traits and acquired habits all at<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">[Pg 290]</a></span> +once, or save one from many a slip and flaw. +Even the Christian Spirit of Love takes time to +work its moral transformation. The tendency of +it, however, is steady and strong in the right direction; +and in due time it will conquer the heart +and control the action of any man who, whether +verbally or silently, whether formally or informally, +maintains this conscious relationship to that Love +at the heart of things which most of us call God. +Jesus and all who have shared His spiritual insight +tell us that the maintenance of this relationship, +close, warm, and quick, is the pearl of great price, +the one thing needful, the potency of righteousness, +the secret of blessedness; and that there is +more hope of a man with a bad record and many +besetting sins who honestly tries to keep this +relationship alive within his breast, than there is +of the self-righteous man who boasts that he can +keep himself outwardly immaculate without these +inward aids.</p> + +<p>Christianity of this simple, vital sort is the +world's salvation. Criticised by enemies and caricatured +by friends; fossilised in the minds of the +aged, and forced on the tongues of the immature; +mingled with all manner of exploded superstition, +false philosophy, science that is not so, and history +that never happened; obscured under absurd rites;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">[Pg 291]</a></span> +buried in incredible creeds; professed by hypocrites; +discredited by sentimentalists; evaporated +by mystics; stereotyped by literalists; monopolised +by sacerdotalists; it has lived in spite of all +the grave-clothes its unbelieving disciples have +tried to wrap around it, and holds the keys of +eternal life.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">[Pg 292]</a></span></p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_293" id="Page_293">[Pg 293]</a></span></p> +<h2><a name="INDEX" id="INDEX"></a>INDEX</h2> + + +<p> +Accident, Stoic explanation of, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>-<a href="#Page_85">85</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Adversity, test of Christian character, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Altruism, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>-<a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Ambition, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>-<a href="#Page_144">144</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Amputation of morbid reflections, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Apperception, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>-<a href="#Page_70">70</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Aristotle—<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Limitations of, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>-<a href="#Page_213">213</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Summary of, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>-<a href="#Page_214">214</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">On—</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Celibacy, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>-<a href="#Page_181">181</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Chastity, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>-<a href="#Page_204">204</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Courage, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>-<a href="#Page_206">206</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Friendship, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>-<a href="#Page_212">212</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Need of instruments, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>-<a href="#Page_194">194</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Pleasure, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>-<a href="#Page_175">175</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Prudence, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Social nature of man, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>-<a href="#Page_179">179</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Temperance, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Test of character, <a href="#Page_184">184</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">The end, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>-<a href="#Page_191">191</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">The mean, <a href="#Page_194">194</a>-<a href="#Page_198">198</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">The virtues, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>-<a href="#Page_208">208</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Wealth, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Wisdom, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Completed in Christianity, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>-<a href="#Page_287">287</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Arnold, Matthew, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Avarice, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>-<a href="#Page_147">147</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Bacteria, on the whole beneficent, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>-<a href="#Page_85">85</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Beatitudes, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Blessedness of Love, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>-<a href="#Page_277">277</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Boss, political, evolution of, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>-<a href="#Page_151">151</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Carlyle, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>-<a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Celestial Surgeon, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Celibacy, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>-<a href="#Page_181">181</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Chastity, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>-<a href="#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>-<a href="#Page_232">232</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Cheerfulness, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Christian—<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Church government, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Forgiveness, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>-<a href="#Page_260">260</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Joy, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Modesty, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Peace, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>-<a href="#Page_272">272</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sacrifice, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>-<a href="#Page_256">256</a>, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>-<a href="#Page_274">274</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Use and misuse of creeds, <a href="#Page_241">241</a>-<a href="#Page_243">243</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Worship, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Interpretation of—</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Art, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>-<a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Business, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>-<a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Divorce, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>-<a href="#Page_235">235</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Marriage, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Murder, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>-<a href="#Page_228">228</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Pleasure, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Politics, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>-<a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Profanity, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Science, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>-<a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Wealth, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>-<a href="#Page_252">252</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Christianity—<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">The completion of—</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Aristotle, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>-<a href="#Page_287">287</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Epicureanism, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>-<a href="#Page_279">279</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Plato, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>-<a href="#Page_284">284</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Stoicism, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>-<a href="#Page_282">282</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Missionary character of, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>-<a href="#Page_263">263</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">In need of intellectual honesty, <a href="#Page_241">241</a>-<a href="#Page_243">243</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Supremacy of, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>-<a href="#Page_291">291</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_294" id="Page_294">[Pg 294]</a></span>Christmas Sermon, Stevenson's, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Circumstances alter acts, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Cleanthes' hymn, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>-<a href="#Page_99">99</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Clubs, women's, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>-<a href="#Page_189">189</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Commandments, Aristotelian, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Cosmopolitanism, Stoic, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>-<a href="#Page_95">95</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Courage, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>-<a href="#Page_206">206</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Cowardice, <a href="#Page_128">128</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Creeds, <a href="#Page_241">241</a>-<a href="#Page_243">243</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Cynicism, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Cynic's prayer, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>-<a href="#Page_97">97</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Death, Christian triumph over, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Epicurean disposition of, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Stoic view of, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Whitman on, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Degeneration, Plato's stages of, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>-<a href="#Page_153">153</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Democracy, ancient and modern, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Plato on, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>-<a href="#Page_149">149</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Depression, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>-<a href="#Page_33">33</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Diet, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>-<a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>-<a href="#Page_126">126</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Difficulty, Stoic attitude toward, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>-<a href="#Page_76">76</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Divorce, logical outcome of Epicureanism, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Christian attitude toward, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>-<a href="#Page_235">235</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Education, Plato's scheme of, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>-<a href="#Page_138">138</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Egoism, duty of adequate, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>-<a href="#Page_15">15</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Electricity, beneficent, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Eliot, George, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>-<a href="#Page_51">51</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Emerson, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>-<a href="#Page_167">167</a>.<br /> +<br /> +End, not justification of means, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>-<a href="#Page_179">179</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Epictetus, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>-<a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Epicurean—<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Day, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>-<a href="#Page_35">35</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Definition of personality, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gods, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Heaven, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Man, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>-<a href="#Page_41">41</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Woman, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>-<a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Epicureanism, defects of, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>-<a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>-<a href="#Page_172">172</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Merits of, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>-<a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>-<a href="#Page_53">53</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Parasitic character of, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>-<a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Epicurus, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>-<a href="#Page_9">9</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Equality, Plato on, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Evil, Stoic solution of, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>-<a href="#Page_90">90</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Eye of good man upon us, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Fighting, a Christian duty, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>-<a href="#Page_272">272</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Fitzgerald, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>-<a href="#Page_16">16</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Forgiveness, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>-<a href="#Page_260">260</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Fortitude, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>-<a href="#Page_129">129</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Friendship, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>-<a href="#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>-<a href="#Page_212">212</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Gentleness before all morality, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Gilbert, W.S., To the Terrestrial Globe, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Gluttony, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Golden Rule, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Good, the, according to Plato, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Gravitation, beneficent, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>-<a href="#Page_84">84</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Gyges' ring, <a href="#Page_115">115</a>-<a href="#Page_116">116</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Handles, two to everything, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Happiness and Virtue, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Harmony, effect of, in education, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Health, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>-<a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Henley, To R. T. H. B., <a href="#Page_100">100</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Heretic, definition of, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>-<a href="#Page_54">54</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Honesty, intellectual, <a href="#Page_241">241</a>-<a href="#Page_243">243</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Horace, Ode on Philosophy of Life, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Humility, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Hurry, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>-<a href="#Page_30">30</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Imaginary presence of good man, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Independence of outward goods, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Indifference to external things, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>-<a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Intellectual honesty, <a href="#Page_241">241</a>-<a href="#Page_243">243</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Jesus' three ways of teaching, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>-<a href="#Page_218">218</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Joy, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_295" id="Page_295">[Pg 295]</a></span>Judas meets himself, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Judging others, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Judgment, Epicurean, Stoic, Platonic, and Aristotelian, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Christian, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>-<a href="#Page_221">221</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Kant, categorical imperative, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Good-will only real good, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>-<a href="#Page_86">86</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Uncompromising modern Stoic, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Law, Jewish, transcended by Christianity, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>-<a href="#Page_238">238</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Stoic reverence for, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>-<a href="#Page_86">86</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Liberty, excess of, leads to slavery, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Lincoln's letter to Greeley, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Literature in education, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>-<a href="#Page_135">135</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Love, Christian, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>-<a href="#Page_291">291</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Lucretius, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>-<a href="#Page_9">9</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Marcus Aurelius, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Marriage, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Mean, Aristotle's doctrine of the, <a href="#Page_194">194</a>-<a href="#Page_198">198</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Meekness, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Melancholy, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>-<a href="#Page_34">34</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Mental healing, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Mercy, <a href="#Page_269">269</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Mill, Christian elements in his doctrine, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Definition of happiness, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Distinction in quality of happiness, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>-<a href="#Page_57">57</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Incompleteness of doctrine, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>-<a href="#Page_278">278</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Inconsistency of, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>-<a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>-<a href="#Page_65">65</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">On social nature of man, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>-<a href="#Page_62">62</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Missionary character of Christianity, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>-<a href="#Page_263">263</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Modesty, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Morrow, how meet most pleasantly, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Murder, Christian definition of, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>-<a href="#Page_228">228</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Mysticism, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Narrow way, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Natural desires, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Neoplatonism, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>-<a href="#Page_164">164</a>.<br /> +<br /> +"New Thought," <a href="#Page_162">162</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Oaths, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Obligation not to be relaxed, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>-<a href="#Page_168">168</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Office, good for one, bad for another, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>-<a href="#Page_187">187</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Omar Khayyam, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>-<a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Opinion in our power, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>-<a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Optimism, superficiality of modern, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Otherworldliness, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Pain, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Parasitic character of Epicureanism, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>-<a href="#Page_45">45</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Patience, <a href="#Page_128">128</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Penitence, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Perfectionism, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>-<a href="#Page_93">93</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Persecution, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>-<a href="#Page_276">276</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Pessimism, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>-<a href="#Page_38">38</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Philosophers, as kings, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Plato—<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Defects of, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>-<a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>-<a href="#Page_168">168</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Merits of, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>-<a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">On—</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Athletics, <a href="#Page_136">136</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Cardinal virtues, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>-<a href="#Page_131">131</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Democracy, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>-<a href="#Page_149">149</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Education, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>-<a href="#Page_138">138</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Literature in education, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>-<a href="#Page_135">135</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Philosophers as kings, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Riches and rich men, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>-<a href="#Page_147">147</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Righteousness, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>-<a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>-<a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>-<a href="#Page_159">159</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">The good, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Completed in Christianity, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>-<a href="#Page_284">284</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Play, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>-<a href="#Page_28">28</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Pleasure, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>-<a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>-<a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>-<a href="#Page_111">111</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>-<a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Politician, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>-<a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>-<a href="#Page_152">152</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Poverty, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Power, things in our, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Prayer, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>-<a href="#Page_258">258</a>, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_296" id="Page_296">[Pg 296]</a></span>Present, the time to live, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Procrastination, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>-<a href="#Page_7">7</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Prudence, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>-<a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Purity, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Reading Gaol, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Religion of Stoics, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>-<a href="#Page_100">100</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Reverence, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Rewards and penalties not essential to virtue, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>-<a href="#Page_115">115</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Riches, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>-<a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>-<a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>-<a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>-<a href="#Page_252">252</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Righteousness, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>-<a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>-<a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>-<a href="#Page_159">159</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Romola, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>-<a href="#Page_51">51</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Sacrifice, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>-<a href="#Page_256">256</a>, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>-<a href="#Page_274">274</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Self-regard and excessive self-sacrifice, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>-<a href="#Page_15">15</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Seneca's pilot, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Sexual morality, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>-<a href="#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Sin, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Sleep, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Social nature of man, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>-<a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>-<a href="#Page_179">179</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Socrates' prayer, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Sorrow, Stoic attitude toward, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>-<a href="#Page_77">77</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Spencer, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>-<a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>-<a href="#Page_278">278</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Spirit, one of three elements in our nature, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>-<a href="#Page_128">128</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Stevenson, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Stoic—<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Acceptance of criticism, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Attitude toward sorrow, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>-<a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>-<a href="#Page_102">102</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Cosmopolitanism, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>-<a href="#Page_95">95</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Doctrine of no degrees in vice, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>-<a href="#Page_92">92</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Equanimity, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>-<a href="#Page_105">105</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Fortitude, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>-<a href="#Page_106">106</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Indifference, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>-<a href="#Page_81">81</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Paradoxes, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>-<a href="#Page_95">95</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Perfection of the sage, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>-<a href="#Page_93">93</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Religion, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>-<a href="#Page_103">103</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Resignation, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>-<a href="#Page_105">105</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Reverence for law, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>-<a href="#Page_86">86</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Solution of problem of evil, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>-<a href="#Page_90">90</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +Stoicism, coldness of, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>-<a href="#Page_109">109</a>.<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Completed in Christianity, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>-<a href="#Page_282">282</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Defects of, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>-<a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Permanent value of, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>-<a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>-<a href="#Page_282">282</a>.</span><br /> +<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Two principles of, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>.</span><br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Temperance, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>-<a href="#Page_204">204</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Theatre, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Tito Melema, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>-<a href="#Page_51">51</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Tranquillity, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Travel, foreign, the paradise of Epicurean women, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Trial, Stoic endurance of, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>,<a href="#Page_89">89</a>-<a href="#Page_90">90</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Tyranny, Plato on, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>-<a href="#Page_153">153</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Tyrant, most miserable of men, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Unrighteousness the greatest evil, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>-<a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>-<a href="#Page_157">157</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Vexation, Stoic formula for, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Virtue, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>-<a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>-<a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>-<a href="#Page_208">208</a>.<br /> +<br /> +<br /> +Wealth, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>-<a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>-<a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>-<a href="#Page_148">148</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>-<a href="#Page_252">252</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Whitman, Walt, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Wisdom, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>-<a href="#Page_131">131</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Work, excessive, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>-<a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>-<a href="#Page_25">25</a>.<br /> +<br /> +Worry, folly of, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>-<a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>-<a href="#Page_253">253</a>.<br /> +</p> + +<hr style="width: 10%;" /> +<p class="center">Printed in the United States of America.</p> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Five Great Philosophies of Life, by +William de Witt Hyde + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FIVE GREAT PHILOSOPHIES *** + +***** This file should be named 39065-h.htm or 39065-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/9/0/6/39065/ + +Produced by Christina Blust, Juliet Sutherland and the +Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> |