summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/orig38801-h/main.htm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 20:11:11 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 20:11:11 -0700
commitf09755e3544f5877d586e6db99360a699ec5e494 (patch)
treed7a7987b3258ebf821608611ba305622d740f9f3 /old/orig38801-h/main.htm
initial commit of ebook 38801HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to 'old/orig38801-h/main.htm')
-rw-r--r--old/orig38801-h/main.htm9840
1 files changed, 9840 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/orig38801-h/main.htm b/old/orig38801-h/main.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..441988f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/orig38801-h/main.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,9840 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+<html lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta name="generator" content="HTML-Kit Tools HTML Tidy plugin" />
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content=
+"text/html; charset=us-ascii" />
+<title>The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Volume 1 (of 12) by Robert
+G. Ingersoll</title>
+
+<style type="text/css">
+/*<![CDATA[*/
+ <!--
+ body { text-align:justify}
+ P { margin:15%;
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ margin-bottom: .75em; }
+ H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; margin-left: 15%; margin-right: 15%; }
+ hr { width: 50%; text-align: center;}
+ hr.full { width: 100%; }
+ .foot { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; text-align: justify; text-indent: -3em; font-size: 90%; }
+ .play { margin-left: 15%; margin-right: 15%; text-align: justify; font-size: 100%; }
+ img {border: 0;}
+ blockquote {font-size: 97%; margin-left: 30%; margin-right: 20%;}
+ .pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
+ /* visibility: hidden; */
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 1%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: left;
+ color: gray;
+ } /* page numbers */
+ .figleft {float: left; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 1%;}
+ .figright {float: right; margin-right: 10%; margin-left: 1%;}
+ .mynote {background-color: #DDE; color: #000; padding: .5em;
+ margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 95%;}
+ .toc { margin-left: 35%; margin-bottom: .75em; font-size: 110%;}
+ .toc2 { margin-left: 45%;}
+ .indent {font-style: italic; font-size: 100%; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}
+ CENTER { padding: 10px;}
+ PRE { font-family: Times; font-style: italic; font-size: 100%; margin-left: 25%;}
+ -->
+/*]]>*/
+</style>
+</head>
+<body>
+<div style="height: 8em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<a name="title" id="title"></a>
+<h1>THE WORKS OF ROBERT G. INGERSOLL</h1>
+<h2>By Robert G. Ingersoll</h2>
+<blockquote>
+<p>"The Destroyer Of Weeds, Thistles And Thorns Is A Benefactor,
+Whether He Soweth Grain Or Not."</p>
+</blockquote>
+<h3>IN TWELVE VOLUMES, VOLUME I.</h3>
+<br />
+<h2>LECTURES</h2>
+<br />
+<h3>1901</h3>
+<h4>THE DRESDEN EDITION</h4>
+<br />
+<br />
+<center>TO</center>
+<center>EVA A. INGERSOLL,</center>
+<center>MY WIFE,</center>
+<center>A WOMAN WITHOUT SUPERSTITION,</center>
+<center>THIS VOLUME</center>
+<center>IS DEDICATED.</center>
+<center>FOR THE LOVE OF GOD.</center>
+<center>FOR THE USE OF MAN,</center>
+<br />
+<center><img alt="Titlepage (64K)" src="images/Titlepage.jpg"
+height="1268" width="746" /></center>
+<br />
+<br />
+<center><img alt="Birthplace (64K)" src="images/Birthplace.jpg"
+height="973" width="672" /></center>
+<br />
+<br />
+<center><img alt="Portrait (62K)" src="images/Portrait.jpg" height=
+"1095" width="666" /></center>
+<br />
+<br />
+<center><img alt="Frontispiece (64K)" src="images/Frontispiece.jpg"
+height="1259" width="715" /></center>
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<hr />
+<br />
+<br />
+<h2>Contents</h2>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#linkTOC">CONTENTS OF VOLUME I.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0001">PUBLISHER'S PREFACE.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0002">THE GODS</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0003">HUMBOLDT.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0004">THOMAS PAINE</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0005">INDIVIDUALITY.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0006">HERETICS AND HERESIES.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0007">THE GHOSTS.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0009">THE LIBERTY OF MAN, WOMAN, AND
+CHILD.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0010">LIBERTY OF WOMAN.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0011">THE LIBERTY OF
+CHILDREN.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#linkCONC">CONCLUSION.</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0013">ABOUT FARMING IN
+ILLINOIS</a></p>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0014">WHAT MUST WE DO TO BE
+SAVED?</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0016">I. WHAT WE MUST DO TO BE
+SAVED</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0017">II. THE GOSPEL OF
+MATTHEW</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0018">III. THE GOSPEL OF
+MARK</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0019">IV. THE GOSPEL OF
+LUKE.</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0020">V. THE GOSPEL OF JOHN</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0021">VI. THE CATHOLICS</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0022">VII. THE EPISCOPALIANS</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0023">VIII. THE METHODISTS</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0024">IX. THE PRESBYTERIANS</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0025">X. THE EVANGELICAL
+ALLIANCE.</a></p>
+<p class="toc2"><a href="#link0026">XI. WHAT DO YOU
+PROPOSE?</a></p>
+<br />
+<br />
+<hr />
+<br />
+<br />
+<a name="linkTOC"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>CONTENTS OF VOLUME I.</h2>
+<blockquote>
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0002">THE GODS.</a></p>
+THE GODS.<br />
+(1872.)<br />
+An Honest God is the Noblest Work of Man&mdash;Resemblance of Gods
+to<br />
+their Creators&mdash;Manufacture and Characteristics of
+Deities&mdash;Their<br />
+Amours&mdash;Deficient in many Departments of
+Knowledge&mdash;Pleased with the<br />
+Butchery of Unbelievers&mdash;A Plentiful
+Supply&mdash;Visitations&mdash;One God's<br />
+Laws of War&mdash;The Book called the Bible&mdash;Heresy of
+Universalism&mdash;Faith<br />
+an unhappy mixture of Insanity and Ignorance&mdash;Fallen Gods,
+or<br />
+Devils&mdash;Directions concerning Human Slavery&mdash;The first
+Appearance of<br />
+the Devil&mdash;The Tree of Knowledge&mdash;Give me the Storm and
+Tempest of<br />
+Thought&mdash;Gods and Devils Natural Productions&mdash;Personal
+Appearance<br />
+of Deities&mdash;All Man's Ideas suggested by his
+Surroundings&mdash;Phenomena<br />
+Supposed to be Produced by Intelligent Powers&mdash;Insanity and
+Disease<br />
+attributed to Evil Spirits&mdash;Origin of the
+Priesthood&mdash;Temptation of<br />
+Christ&mdash;Innate Ideas&mdash;Divine Interference&mdash;Special
+Providence&mdash;The<br />
+Crane and the Fish&mdash;Cancer as a proof of Design&mdash;Matter
+and<br />
+Force&mdash;Miracle&mdash;Passing the Hat for just one
+Fact&mdash;Sir William Hamilton<br />
+on Cause and Effect&mdash;The Phenomena of Mind&mdash;Necessity and
+Free Will&mdash;The<br />
+Dark Ages&mdash;The Originality of Repetition&mdash;Of what Use
+have the Gods been<br />
+to Man?&mdash;Paley and Design&mdash;Make Good Health
+Contagious&mdash;Periodicity of<br />
+the Universe and the Commencement of Intellectual
+Freedom&mdash;Lesson of<br />
+the ineffectual attempt to rescue the Tomb of Christ from the<br />
+Mohammedans&mdash;The Cemetery of the Gods&mdash;Taking away
+Crutches&mdash;Imperial<br />
+Reason<br />
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0003">HUMBOLDT.</a></p>
+HUMBOLDT.<br />
+(1869.)<br />
+The Universe is Governed by Law&mdash;The Self-made
+Man&mdash;Poverty generally<br />
+an Advantage&mdash;Humboldt's Birth-place&mdash;His desire for
+Travel&mdash;On what<br />
+Humboldt's Fame depends&mdash;His Companions and
+Friends&mdash;Investigations<br />
+in the New World&mdash;A Picture&mdash;Subjects of his
+Addresses&mdash;Victory of the<br />
+Church over Philosophy&mdash;Influence of the discovery that the
+World is<br />
+governed by Law&mdash;On the term
+Law&mdash;Copernicus&mdash;Astronomy&mdash;Aryabhatta&mdash;<br />
+Descartes&mdash;Condition of the World and Man when the morning of
+Science<br />
+Dawned&mdash;Reasons for Honoring Humboldt&mdash;The World his
+Monument<br />
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0004">THOMAS PAINE.</a></p>
+THOMAS PAINE.<br />
+(1870.)<br />
+With his Name left out the History of Liberty cannot be
+Written&mdash;Paine's<br />
+Origin and Condition&mdash;His arrival in America with a Letter
+of<br />
+Introduction by Franklin&mdash;Condition of the
+Colonies&mdash;"Common Sense"&mdash;A<br />
+new Nation Born&mdash;Paine the Best of Political Writers&mdash;The
+"Crisis"&mdash;War<br />
+not to the Interest of a trading Nation&mdash;Paine's Standing at
+the Close<br />
+of the Revolution&mdash;Close of the Eighteenth Century in
+France-The<br />
+"Rights of Man"&mdash;Paine Prosecuted in England&mdash;"The World
+is my<br />
+Country"&mdash;Elected to the French Assembly&mdash;Votes against
+the Death of<br />
+the King&mdash;Imprisoned&mdash;A look behind the Altar&mdash;The
+"Age of Reason"&mdash;His<br />
+Argument against the Bible as a Revelation&mdash;Christianity of
+Paine's<br />
+Day&mdash;A Blasphemy Law in Force in Maryland&mdash;The Scotch
+"Kirk"&mdash;Hanging<br />
+of Thomas Aikenhead for Denying the Inspiration of the<br />
+Scriptures&mdash;"Cathedrals and Domes, and Chimes and
+Chants"&mdash;Science&mdash;"He<br />
+Died in the Land his Genius Defended,"<br />
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0005">INDIVIDUALITY.</a></p>
+INDIVIDUALITY.<br />
+(1873.)<br />
+"His Soul was like a Star and Dwelt Apart"&mdash;Disobedience one
+of the<br />
+Conditions of Progress.&mdash;Magellan&mdash;The Monarch and the
+Hermit-Why<br />
+the Church hates a Thinker&mdash;The Argument from Grandeur
+and<br />
+Prosperity-Travelers and Guide-boards&mdash;A Degrading
+Saying&mdash;Theological<br />
+Education&mdash;Scotts, Henrys and McKnights&mdash;The Church the
+Great<br />
+Robber&mdash;Corrupting the Reason of Children&mdash;Monotony of
+Acquiescence: For<br />
+God's sake, say No&mdash;Protestant Intolerance: Luther and
+Calvin&mdash;Assertion<br />
+of Individual Independence a Step toward Infidelity&mdash;Salute
+to<br />
+Jupiter&mdash;The Atheistic Bug-Little Religious Liberty in
+America&mdash;God in<br />
+the Constitution, Man Out&mdash;Decision of the Supreme Court of
+Illinois<br />
+that an Unbeliever could not testify in any
+Court&mdash;Dissimulation&mdash;Nobody<br />
+in this Bed&mdash;The Dignity of a Unit<br />
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0006">HERETICS AND HERESIES.</a></p>
+HERETICS AND HERESIES.<br />
+(1874.)<br />
+Liberty, a Word without which all other Words are Vain&mdash;The
+Church, the<br />
+Bible, and Persecution&mdash;Over the wild Waves of War rose and
+fell<br />
+the Banner of Jesus Christ&mdash;Highest Type of the Orthodox<br />
+Christian&mdash;Heretics' Tongues and why they should be Removed
+before<br />
+Burning&mdash;The Inquisition Established&mdash;Forms of
+Torture&mdash;Act of Henry<br />
+VIII for abolishing Diversity of Opinion&mdash;What a Good
+Christian was<br />
+Obliged to Believe&mdash;The Church has Carried the Black
+Flag&mdash;For what Men<br />
+and Women have been Burned&mdash;John Calvin's Advent into
+the<br />
+World&mdash;His Infamous Acts&mdash;Michael
+Servetus&mdash;Castalio&mdash;Spread of<br />
+Presbyterianism&mdash;Indictment of a Presbyterian Minister in
+Illinois for<br />
+Heresy&mdash;Specifications&mdash;The Real Bible<br />
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0007">THE GHOSTS.</a></p>
+THE GHOSTS.<br />
+(1877.)<br />
+Dedication to Ebon C. Ingersoll&mdash;Preface&mdash;Mendacity of
+the Religious<br />
+Press&mdash;"Materialism"&mdash;Ways of Pleasing the
+Ghosts&mdash;The Idea of<br />
+Immortality not Born of any Book&mdash;Witchcraft and
+Demon-ology&mdash;Witch<br />
+Trial before Sir Matthew Hale&mdash;John Wesley a Firm Believer
+in<br />
+Ghosts&mdash;"Witch-spots"&mdash;Lycanthropy&mdash;Animals Tried
+and Convicted&mdash;The<br />
+Governor of Minnesota and the Grasshoppers&mdash;A Papal Bull
+against<br />
+Witchcraft&mdash;Victims of the Delusion&mdash;Sir William
+Blackstone's<br />
+Affirmation&mdash;Trials in Belgium&mdash;Incubi and
+Succubi&mdash;A Bishop<br />
+Personated by the Devil&mdash;The Doctrine that Diseases are caused
+by<br />
+Ghosts&mdash;Treatment&mdash;Timothy Dwight against
+Vaccination&mdash;Ghosts as<br />
+Historians&mdash;The Language of Eden&mdash;Leibnitz, Founder of
+the Science<br />
+of Language&mdash;Cosmas on Astronomy&mdash;Vagaries of Kepler and
+Tycho<br />
+Brahe&mdash;Discovery of Printing, Powder, and America&mdash;Thanks
+to the<br />
+Inventors&mdash;The Catholic Murderer and the Meat&mdash;Let the
+Ghosts Go<br />
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0009">THE LIBERTY OF MAN, WOMAN, AND
+CHILD.</a></p>
+THE LIBERTY OF MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD.<br />
+(1877.)<br />
+Liberty sustains the same Relation to Mind that Space does to<br />
+Matter&mdash;The History of Man a History of Slavery&mdash;The
+Infidel Our<br />
+Fathers in the good old Time&mdash;The iron Arguments that
+Christians<br />
+Used&mdash;Instruments of Torture&mdash;A Vision of the
+Inquisition&mdash;Models of<br />
+Man's Inventions&mdash;Weapons, Armor, Musical Instruments,
+Paintings,<br />
+Books, Skulls&mdash;The Gentleman in the Dug-out&mdash;Homage to
+Genius and<br />
+Intellect&mdash;Abraham Lincoln&mdash;What I mean by
+Liberty&mdash;The Man who cannot<br />
+afford to Speak his Thought is a Certificate of the Meanness of
+the<br />
+Community in which he Resides&mdash;Liberty of Woman&mdash;Marriage
+and the<br />
+Family&mdash;Ornaments the Souvenirs of Bondage-The Story of the
+Garden of<br />
+Eden&mdash;Adami and Heva&mdash;Equality of the Sexes-The word
+"Boss"&mdash;The Cross<br />
+Man-The Stingy Man&mdash;Wives who are Beggars&mdash;How to Spend
+Money&mdash;By<br />
+the Tomb of the Old Napoleon&mdash;The Woman you Love will never
+Grow<br />
+Old&mdash;Liberty of Children&mdash;When your Child tells a
+Lie&mdash;Disowning<br />
+Children&mdash;Beating your own Flesh and Blood&mdash;Make Home
+Pleasant&mdash;Sunday<br />
+when I was a Boy&mdash;The Laugh of a Child&mdash;The doctrine of
+Eternal<br />
+Punishment&mdash;Jonathan Edwards on the Happiness of Believing
+Husbands<br />
+whose Wives are in Hell&mdash;The Liberty of Eating and
+Sleeping&mdash;Water in<br />
+Fever&mdash;Soil and Climate necessary to the production of
+Genius&mdash;Against<br />
+Annexing Santo Domingo&mdash;Descent of Man&mdash;Conclusion<br />
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0013">ABOUT FARMING IN
+ILLINOIS.</a></p>
+ABOUT FARMING IN ILLINOIS.<br />
+(1877.)<br />
+To Plow is to Pray; to Plant is to Prophesy, and the Harvest
+Answers and<br />
+Fulfills&mdash;The Old Way of Farming&mdash;Cooking an Unknown
+Art-Houses, Fuel,<br />
+and Crops&mdash;The Farmer's Boy&mdash;What a Farmer should
+Sell&mdash;Beautifying<br />
+the Home&mdash;Advantages of Illinois as a Farming
+State&mdash;Advantages of the<br />
+Farmer over the Mechanic&mdash;Farm Life too Lonely-On Early
+Rising&mdash;Sleep<br />
+the Best Doctor&mdash;Fashion&mdash;Patriotism and Boarding
+Houses&mdash;The Farmer and<br />
+the Railroads&mdash;Money and Confidence&mdash;Demonetization of
+Silver-Area of<br />
+Illinois&mdash;Mortgages and Interest&mdash;Kindness to Wives and
+Children&mdash;How<br />
+a Beefsteak should be Cooked&mdash;Decorations and
+Comfort&mdash;Let the Children<br />
+Sleep&mdash;Old Age<br />
+<p class="toc"><a href="#link0014">WHAT MUST WE DO TO BE
+SAVED?</a></p>
+WHAT MUST WE DO TO BE SAVED?<br />
+(1880.)<br />
+Preface&mdash;The Synoptic Gospels&mdash;Only Mark Knew of the
+Necessity of<br />
+Belief&mdash;Three Christs Described&mdash;The Jewish Gentleman and
+the Piece of<br />
+Bacon&mdash;Who Wrote the New Testament?&mdash;Why Christ and the
+Apostles wrote<br />
+Nothing&mdash;Infinite Respect for the Man Christ&mdash;Different
+Feeling for<br />
+the Theological Christ&mdash;Saved from What?&mdash;Chapter on the
+Gospel of<br />
+Matthew&mdash;What this Gospel says we must do to be
+Saved&mdash;Jesus and the<br />
+Children&mdash;John Calvin and Jonathan Edwards conceived of as
+Dimpled<br />
+Darlings&mdash;Christ and the Man who inquired what Good Thing he
+should<br />
+do that he might have Eternal Life&mdash;Nothing said about
+Belief&mdash;An<br />
+Interpolation&mdash;Chapter on the Gospel of Mark&mdash;The Believe
+or be Damned<br />
+Passage, and why it was written&mdash;The last Conversation of
+Christ with<br />
+his Disciples&mdash;The Signs that Follow them that
+Believe&mdash;Chapter on<br />
+the Gospel of Luke&mdash;Substantial Agreement with Matthew and
+Mark&mdash;How<br />
+Zaccheus achieved Salvation&mdash;The two Thieves on the
+Cross&mdash;Chapter<br />
+on the Gospel of John&mdash;The Doctrine of Regeneration, or the
+New<br />
+Birth&mdash;Shall we Love our Enemies while God Damns
+His?&mdash;Chapter on the<br />
+Catholics&mdash;Communication with Heaven through Decayed
+Saints&mdash;Nuns and<br />
+Nunneries&mdash;Penitentiaries of God should be
+Investigated&mdash;The<br />
+Athanasian Creed expounded&mdash;The Trinity and its
+Members&mdash;Chapter on the<br />
+Episcopalians&mdash;Origin of the Episcopal Church&mdash;Apostolic
+Succession<br />
+an Imported Article&mdash;Episcopal Creed like the Catholic, with
+a<br />
+few Additional Absurdities&mdash;Chapter on the
+Methodists&mdash;Wesley and<br />
+Whitfield&mdash;Their Quarrel about Predestination&mdash;Much
+Preaching for Little<br />
+Money&mdash;Adapted to New Countries&mdash;Chapter on the
+Presbyterians&mdash;John<br />
+Calvin, Murderer&mdash;Meeting between Calvin and Knox&mdash;The
+Infamy of<br />
+Calvinism&mdash;Division in the Church&mdash;The Young
+Presbyterian's Resignation<br />
+to the Fate of his Mother&mdash;A Frightful, Hideous, and
+Hellish<br />
+Creed&mdash;Chapter on the Evangelical Alliance&mdash;Jeremy
+Taylor's Opinion of<br />
+Baptists&mdash;Orthodoxy not Dead&mdash;Creed of the
+Alliance&mdash;Total Depravity,<br />
+Eternal Damnation&mdash;What do You Propose?&mdash;The Gospel of
+Good-fellowship,<br />
+Cheerfulness, Health, Good Living, Justice&mdash;No
+Forgiveness&mdash;God's<br />
+Forgiveness Does not Pay my Debt to Smith&mdash;Gospel of Liberty,
+of<br />
+Intelligence, of Humanity&mdash;One World at a Time&mdash;"Upon
+that Rock I<br />
+Stand"<br /></blockquote>
+<a name="link0001"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>PUBLISHER'S PREFACE.</h2>
+<p>IN presenting to the public this edition of the late Robert G.
+Ingersoll's works, it has been the aim of the publisher to make it
+worthy of the author and a pleasure to his friends and admirers. No
+one can be more conscious than he of the magnitude of the task
+undertaken, or more keenly feel how far short it must fall of
+adequate accomplishment.</p>
+<p>When it is remembered that countless utterances of the author
+were never caught from his eloquent lips, it is matter for
+congratulation that so much has been preserved. The authorized
+addresses, arguments and articles that have already appeared in
+print and passed the review of the authors more or less careful
+inspection, will be readily recognized as accurate and complete;
+but in this latest and fullest compilation are many emanations from
+his heart and brain that have never had his scrutiny, were not
+revised by him, and that yet, by general judgment, should not be
+lost to the world.</p>
+<p>These unedited sundries consist of fragments of speeches and
+incompleted articles discovered amongst the authors literary
+remains and for unknown reasons left in more or less unfinished
+form. It has been the publisher's ambition to gather these fugitive
+pieces and place them in this edition by the side of the saved
+treasures. Whether the work has been well or ill done a generous
+public must decide, while the sole responsibility must rest with,
+as it has been assumed by, the publisher.</p>
+<p>In carrying out the design of the present edition, the publisher
+gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Mr. Ingersoll's family,
+who have freely placed at his disposal many papers, inscriptions,
+monographs, memoranda and pages of valuable material.</p>
+<p>Recognition is also here made of the kind courtesy of the press
+and of publishers of magazines who have generously permitted the
+publication of articles originally written for them.</p>
+<p>Finally, the publisher gives his thanks to all the devoted
+friends of the author who in many ways, by suggestion and unselfish
+labor, have aided in getting out this work. Of these, none have
+been more unremitting in service, and to none is the publisher more
+indebted, than to Mr. I. Newton Baker, Mr. Ingersoll's former
+private secretary, to Dr. Edgar C. Beall, and to Mr. George E.
+Macdonald for the fine Tables of Contents and the very valuable
+Index to this edition.</p>
+<center>C. P. FARRELL.</center>
+<p>New York, July, 1900.</p>
+<a name="link0002"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>THE GODS</h2>
+<h3>An Honest God is the Noblest Work of Man.</h3>
+<p>EACH nation has created a god, and the god has always resembled
+his creators. He hated and loved what they hated and loved, and he
+was invariably found on the side of those in power. Each god was
+intensely patriotic, and detested all nations but his own. All
+these gods demanded praise, flattery, and worship. Most of them
+were pleased with sacrifice, and the smell of innocent blood has
+ever been considered a divine perfume. All these gods have insisted
+upon having a vast number of priests, and the priests have always
+insisted upon being supported by the people, and the principal
+business of these priests has been to boast about their god, and to
+insist that he could easily vanquish all the other gods put
+together.</p>
+<p>These gods have been manufactured after numberless models, and
+according to the most grotesque fashions. Some have a thousand
+arms, some a hundred heads, some are adorned with necklaces of
+living snakes, some are armed with clubs, some with sword and
+shield, some with bucklers, and some have wings as a cherub; some
+were invisible, some would show themselves entire, and some would
+only show their backs; some were jealous, some were foolish, some
+turned themselves into men, some into swans, some into bulls, some
+into doves, and some into Holy Ghosts, and made love to the
+beautiful daughters of men. Some were married&mdash;all ought to
+have been&mdash;and some were considered as old bachelors from all
+eternity. Some had children, and the children were turned into gods
+and worshiped as their fathers had been. Most of these gods were
+revengeful, savage, lustful, and ignorant. As they generally
+depended upon their priests for information, their ignorance can
+hardly excite our astonishment.</p>
+<p>These gods did not even know the shape of the worlds they had
+created, but supposed them perfectly flat Some thought the day
+could be lengthened by stopping the sun, that the blowing of horns
+could throw down the walls of a city, and all knew so little of the
+real nature of the people they had created, that they commanded the
+people to love them. Some were so ignorant as to suppose that man
+could believe just as he might desire, or as they might command,
+and that to be governed by observation, reason, and experience was
+a most foul and damning sin. None of these gods could give a true
+account of the creation of this little earth. All were wofully
+deficient in geology and astronomy. As a rule, they were most
+miserable legislators, and as executives, they were far inferior to
+the average of American presidents.</p>
+<p>These deities have demanded the most abject and degrading
+obedience. In order to please them, man must lay his very face in
+the dust Of course, they have always been partial to the people who
+created them, and have generally shown their partiality by
+assisting those people to rob and destroy others, and to ravish
+their wives and daughters.</p>
+<p>Nothing is so pleasing to these gods as the butchery of
+unbelievers. Nothing so enrages them, even now, as to have some one
+deny their existence.</p>
+<p>Few nations have been so poor as to have but one god. Gods were
+made so easily, and the raw material cost so little, that generally
+the god market was fairly glutted, and heaven crammed with these
+phantoms. These gods not only attended to the skies, but were
+supposed to interfere in all the affairs of men. They presided over
+everybody and everything. They attended to every department. All
+was supposed to be under their immediate control. Nothing was too
+small&mdash;nothing too large; the falling of sparrows and the
+motions of the planets were alike attended to by these industrious
+and observing deities. From their starry thrones they frequently
+came to the earth for the purpose of imparting information to man.
+It is related of one that he came amid thunderings and lightnings
+in order to tell the people that they should not cook a kid in its
+mother's milk. Some left their shining abodes to tell women that
+they should, or should not, have children, to inform a priest how
+to cut and wear his apron, and to give directions as to the proper
+manner of cleaning the intestines of a bird.</p>
+<p>When the people failed to worship one of these gods, or failed
+to feed and clothe his priests, (which was much the same thing,) he
+generally visited them with pestilence and famine. Sometimes he
+allowed some other nation to drag them into slavery&mdash;to sell
+their wives and children; but generally he glutted his vengeance by
+murdering their first-born. The priests always did their whole
+duty, not only in predicting these calamities, but in proving, when
+they did happen, that they were brought upon the people because
+they had not given quite enough to them.</p>
+<p>These gods differed just as the nations differed; the greatest
+and most powerful had the most powerful gods, while the weaker ones
+were obliged to content themselves with the very off-scourings of
+the heavens. Each of these gods promised happiness here and
+hereafter to all his slaves, and threatened to eternally punish all
+who either disbelieved in his existence or suspected that some
+other god might be his superior; but to deny the existence of all
+gods was, and is, the crime of crimes. Redden your hands with human
+blood; blast by slander the fair fame of the innocent; strangle the
+smiling child upon its mother's knees; deceive, ruin and desert the
+beautiful girl who loves and trusts you, and your case is not
+hopeless. For all this, and for all these you may be forgiven. For
+all this, and for all these, that bankrupt court established by the
+gospel, will give you a discharge; but deny the existence of these
+divine ghosts, of these gods, and the sweet and tearful face of
+Mercy becomes livid with eternal hate. Heaven's golden gates are
+shut, and you, with an infinite curse ringing in your ears, with
+the brand of infamy upon your brow, commence your endless
+wanderings in the lurid gloom of hell&mdash;an immortal
+vagrant&mdash;an eternal outcast&mdash;a deathless convict.</p>
+<p>One of these gods, and one who demands our love, our admiration
+and our worship, and one who is worshiped, if mere heartless
+ceremony is worship, gave to his chosen people for their guidance,
+the following laws of war: "When thou comest nigh unto a city to
+fight against it, <i>then proclaim peace unto it</i>. And it shall
+be if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it
+shall be that all the people that is found therein shall be
+tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. And if it will
+make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou
+shalt besiege it.</p>
+<p>"And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thy hands,
+thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword. But
+the women and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in
+the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself,
+and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies which the Lord thy
+God hath given thee. Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which
+are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these
+nations. But of the cities of these people which the Lord thy God
+doth give thee for an inheritance, <i>thou shalt save alive nothing
+that breatheth</i>"</p>
+<p>Is it possible for man to conceive of anything more perfectly
+infamous? Can you believe that such directions were given by any
+being except an infinite fiend? Remember that the army receiving
+these instructions was one of invasion. Peace was offered upon
+condition that the people submitting should be the slaves of the
+invader; but if any should have the courage to defend their homes,
+to fight for the love of wife and child, then the sword was to
+spare none&mdash;not even the prattling, dimpled babe.</p>
+<p>And we are called upon to worship such a God; to get upon our
+knees and tell him that he is good, that he is merciful, that he is
+just, that he is love. We are asked to stifle every noble sentiment
+of the soul, and to trample under foot all the sweet charities of
+the heart. Because we refuse to stultify ourselves&mdash;refuse to
+become liars&mdash;we are denounced, hated, traduced and ostracized
+here, and this same god threatens to torment us in eternal fire the
+moment death allows him to fiercely clutch our naked helpless
+souls. Let the people hate, let the god threaten&mdash;we will
+educate them, and we will despise and defy him.</p>
+<p>The book, called the Bible, is filled with passages equally
+horrible, unjust and atrocious. This is the book to be read in
+schools in order to make our children loving, kind and gentle! This
+is the book to be recognized in our Constitution as the source of
+all authority and justice!</p>
+<p>Strange! that no one has ever been persecuted by the church for
+believing God bad, while hundreds of millions have been destroyed
+for thinking him good. The orthodox church never will forgive the
+Universalist for saying "God is love." It has always been
+considered as one of the very highest evidences of true and
+undefiled religion to insist that all men, women and children
+deserve eternal damnation. It has always been heresy to say, "God
+will at last save all."</p>
+<p>We are asked to justify these frightful passages, these infamous
+laws of war, because the Bible is the word of God. As a matter of
+fact, there never was, and there never can be, an argument, even
+tending to prove the inspiration of any book whatever. In the
+absence of positive evidence, analogy and experience, argument is
+simply impossible, and at the very best, can amount only to a
+useless agitation of the air.</p>
+<p>The instant we admit that a book is too sacred to be doubted, or
+even reasoned about, we are mental serfs. It is infinitely absurd
+to suppose that a god would address a communication to intelligent
+beings, and yet make it a crime, to be punished in eternal flames,
+for them to use their intelligence for the purpose of understanding
+his communication. If we have the right to use our reason, we
+certainly have the right to act in accordance with it, and no god
+can have the right to punish us for such action.</p>
+<p>The doctrine that future happiness depends upon belief is
+monstrous. It is the infamy of infamies. The notion that faith in
+Christ is to be rewarded by an eternity of bliss, while a
+dependence upon reason, observation, and experience merits
+everlasting pain, is too absurd for refutation, and can be relieved
+only by that unhappy mixture of insanity and ignorance, called
+"faith." What man, who ever thinks, can believe that blood can
+appease God? And yet, our entire system of religion is based upon
+that belief. The Jews pacified Jehovah with the blood of animals,
+and according to the Christian system, the blood of Jesus softened
+the heart of God a little, and rendered possible the salvation of a
+fortunate few. It is hard to conceive how the human mind can give
+assent to such terrible ideas, or how any sane man can read the
+Bible and still believe in the doctrine of inspiration.</p>
+<p>Whether the Bible is true or false, is of no consequence in
+comparison with the mental freedom of the race.</p>
+<p>Salvation through slavery is worthless. Salvation from slavery
+is inestimable.</p>
+<p>As long as man believes the Bible to be infallible, that book is
+his master. The civilization of this century is not the child of
+faith, but of unbelief&mdash;the result of free thought.</p>
+<p>All that is necessary, as it seems to me, to convince any
+reasonable person that the Bible is simply and purely of human
+invention&mdash;of barbarian invention&mdash;is to read it Read it
+as you would any other book; think of it as you would of any other;
+get the bandage of reverence from your eyes; drive from your heart
+the phantom of fear; push from the throne of your brain the cowled
+form of superstition&mdash;then read the Holy Bible, and you will
+be amazed that you ever, for one moment, supposed a being of
+infinite wisdom, goodness and purity, to be the author of such
+ignorance and of such atrocity.</p>
+<p>Our ancestors not only had their god-factories, but they made
+devils as well. These devils were generally disgraced and fallen
+gods. Some had headed unsuccessful revolts; some had been caught
+sweetly reclining in the shadowy folds of some fleecy cloud,
+kissing the wife of the god of gods. These devils generally
+sympathized with man. There is in regard to them a most wonderful
+fact: In nearly all the theologies, mythologies and religions, the
+devils have been much more humane and merciful than the gods. No
+devil ever gave one of his generals an order to kill children and
+to rip open the bodies of pregnant women. Such barbarities were
+always ordered by the good gods. The pestilences were sent by the
+most merciful gods. The frightful famine, during which the dying
+child with pallid lips sucked the withered bosom of a dead mother,
+was sent by the loving gods. No devil was ever charged with such
+fiendish brutality.</p>
+<p>One of these gods, according to the account, drowned an entire
+world, with the exception of eight persons. The old, the young, the
+beautiful and the helpless were remorsely devoured by the shoreless
+sea. This, the most fearful tragedy that the imagination of
+ignorant priests ever conceived, was the act, not of a devil, but
+of a god, so-called, whom men ignorantly worship unto this day.
+What a stain such an act would leave upon the character of a devil!
+One of the prophets of one of these gods, having in his power a
+captured king, hewed him in pieces in the sight of all the people.
+Was ever any imp of any devil guilty of such savagery?</p>
+<p>One of these gods is reported to have given the following
+directions concerning human slavery: "If thou buy a Hebrew servant,
+six years shall he serve, and in the seventh he shall go out free
+for nothing. If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself;
+if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his
+master have given him a wife, and she have borne him sons or
+daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he
+shall go out by himself. And if the servant shall plainly say, I
+love my master, my wife and my children; I will not go out free.
+Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also
+bring him unto the door, or unto the door-post; and his master
+shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him
+forever."</p>
+<p>According to this, a man was given liberty upon condition that
+he would desert forever his wife and children. Did any devil ever
+force upon a husband, upon a father, so cruel and so heartless an
+alternative? Who can worship such a god? Who can bend the knee to
+such a monster? Who can pray to such a fiend?</p>
+<p>All these gods threatened to torment forever the souls of their
+enemies. Did any devil ever make so infamous a threat? The basest
+thing recorded of the devil, is what he did concerning Job and his
+family, and that was done by the express permission of one of these
+gods, and to decide a little difference of opinion between their
+serene highnesses as to the character of "my servant Job." The
+first account we have of the devil is found in that purely
+scientific book called Genesis, and is as follows: "Now the serpent
+was more subtile than any beast of the field which the Lord God had
+made, and he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not
+eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden? And the woman said
+unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the
+garden; but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the
+garden God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye
+touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye
+shall not surely die. For God doth know that in the day ye eat
+thereof, then your eyes shall be opened and ye shall be as gods,
+knowing good and evil. And when the woman saw that the tree was
+good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to
+be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof and did
+eat, and gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat....
+And the Lord God said, Behold the man is become as one of us, to
+know good and evil; and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take
+also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever. Therefore the
+Lord God sent him forth from the Garden of Eden to till the ground
+from which he was taken. So he drove out the man, and he placed at
+the east of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword, which
+turned every way to keep the way of the tree of life."</p>
+<p>According to this account the promise of the devil was fulfilled
+to the very letter. Adam and Eve did not die, and they did become
+as gods, knowing good and evil.</p>
+<p>The account shows, however, that the gods dreaded education and
+knowledge then just as they do now. The church still faithfully
+guards the dangerous tree of knowledge, and has exerted in all ages
+her utmost power to keep mankind from eating the fruit thereof. The
+priests have never ceased repeating the old falsehood and the old
+threat: "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye
+die." From every pulpit comes the same cry, born of the same fear:
+"Lest they eat and become as gods, knowing good and evil." For this
+reason, religion hates science, faith detests reason, theology is
+the sworn enemy of philosophy, and the church with its flaming
+sword still guards the hated tree, and like its supposed founder,
+curses to the lowest depths the brave thinkers who eat and become
+as gods.</p>
+<p>If the account given in Genesis is really true, ought we not,
+after all, to thank this serpent? He was the first schoolmaster,
+the first advocate of learning, the first enemy of ignorance, the
+first to whisper in human ears the sacred word liberty, the creator
+of ambition, the author of modesty, of inquiry, of doubt, of
+investigation, of progress and of civilization.</p>
+<p>Give me the storm and tempest of thought and action, rather than
+the dead calm of ignorance and faith! Banish me from Eden when you
+will; but first let me eat of the fruit of the tree of
+knowledge!</p>
+<p>Some nations have borrowed their gods; of this number, we are
+compelled to say, is our own. The Jews having ceased to exist as a
+nation, and having no further use for a god, our ancestors
+appropriated him and adopted their devil at the same time. This
+borrowed god is still an object of some adoration, and this adopted
+devil still excites the apprehensions of our people. He is still
+supposed to be setting his traps and snares for the purpose of
+catching our unwary souls, and is still, with reasonable success,
+waging the old war against our God.</p>
+<p>To me, it seems easy to account for these ideas concerning gods
+and devils. They are a perfectly natural production. Man has
+created them all, and under the same circumstances would create
+them again. Man has not only created all these gods, but he has
+created them out of the materials by which he has been surrounded.
+Generally he has modeled them after himself, and has given them
+hands, heads, feet, eyes, ears, and organs of speech. Each nation
+made its gods and devils speak its language not only, but put in
+their mouths the same mistakes in history, geography, astronomy,
+and in all matters of fact, generally made by the people. No god
+was ever in advance of the nation that created him. The negroes
+represented their deities with black skins and curly hair. The
+Mongolian gave to his a yellow complexion and dark almond-shaped
+eyes. The Jews were not allowed to paint theirs, or we should have
+seen Jehovah with a full beard, an oval face, and an aquiline nose.
+Zeus was a perfect Greek, and Jove looked as though a member of the
+Roman senate. The gods of Egypt had the patient face and placid
+look of the loving people who made them. The gods of northern
+countries were represented warmly clad in robes of fur; those of
+the tropics were naked. The gods of India were often mounted upon
+elephants; those of some islanders were great swimmers, and the
+deities of the Arctic zone were passionately fond of whale's
+blubber. Nearly all people have carved or painted representations
+of their gods, and these representations were, by the lower
+classes, generally treated as the real gods, and to these images
+and idols they addressed prayers and offered sacrifice.</p>
+<p>In some countries? even at this day, if the people after long
+praying do not obtain their desires, they turn their images off as
+impotent gods, or upbraid them in a most reproachful manner,
+loading them with blows and curses. 'How now, dog of a spirit,'
+they say, 'we give you lodging in a magnificent temple, we gild you
+with gold, feed you with the choicest food, and offer incense to
+you; yet, after all this care, you are so ungrateful as to refuse
+us what we ask.'</p>
+<p>Hereupon they will pull the god down and drag him through the
+filth of the street. If, in the meantime, it happens that they
+obtain their request, then, with a great deal of ceremony, they
+wash him clean, carry him back and place him in his temple again,
+where they fall down and make excuses for what they have done. 'Of
+a truth,' they say, 'we were a little too hasty, and you were a
+little too long in your grant. Why should you bring this beating on
+yourself. But what is done cannot be undone. Let us not think of it
+any more. If you will forget what is past, we will gild you over
+brighter again than before.</p>
+<p>Man has never been at a loss for gods. He has worshiped almost
+everything, including the vilest and most disgusting beasts. He has
+worshiped fire, earth, air, water, light, stars, and for hundreds
+of ages prostrated himself before enormous snakes. Savage tribes
+often make gods of articles they get from civilized people. The
+Todas worship a cow-bell. The Kotas worship two silver plates,
+which they regard as husband and wife, and another tribe
+manufactured a god out of a king of hearts.</p>
+<p>Man, having always been the physical superior of woman, accounts
+for the fact that most of the high gods have been males. Had woman
+been the physical superior, the powers supposed to be the rulers of
+Nature would have been women, and instead of being represented in
+the apparel of man, they would have luxuriated in trains, lownecked
+dresses, laces and back-hair.</p>
+<p>Nothing can be plainer than that each nation gives to its god
+its peculiar characteristics, and that every individual gives to
+his god his personal peculiarities.</p>
+<p>Man has no ideas, and can have none, except those suggested by
+his surroundings. He cannot conceive of anything utterly unlike
+what he has seen or felt. He can exaggerate, diminish, combine,
+separate, deform, beautify, improve, multiply and compare what he
+sees, what he feels, what he hears, and all of which he takes
+cognizance through the medium of the senses; but he cannot create.
+Having seen exhibitions of power, he can say, omnipotent. Having
+lived, he can say, immortality. Knowing something of time, he can
+say, eternity. Conceiving something of intelligence, he can say,
+God. Having seen exhibitions of malice, he can say, devil. A few
+gleams of happiness having fallen athwart the gloom of his life, he
+can say, heaven. Pain, in its numberless forms, having been
+experienced, he can say, hell. Yet all these ideas have a
+foundation in fact, and only a foundation. The superstructure has
+been reared by exaggerating, diminishing, combining, separating,
+deforming, beautifying, improving or multiplying realities, so that
+the edifice or fabric is but the incongruous grouping of what man
+has perceived through the medium of the senses. It is as though we
+should give to a lion the wings of an eagle, the hoofs of a bison,
+the tail of a horse, the pouch of a kangaroo, and the trunk of an
+elephant. We have in imagination created an impossible monster. And
+yet the various parts of this monster really exist So it is with
+all the gods that man has made.</p>
+<p>Beyond nature man cannot go even in thought&mdash;above nature
+he cannot rise&mdash;below nature he cannot fall.</p>
+<p>Man, in his ignorance, supposed that all phenomena were produced
+by some intelligent powers, and with direct reference to him. To
+preserve friendly relations with these powers was, and still is,
+the object of all religions. Man knelt through fear and to implore
+assistance, or through gratitude for some favor which he supposed
+had been rendered. He endeavored by supplication to appease some
+being who, for some reason, had, as he believed, become enraged.
+The lightning and thunder terrified him. In the presence of the
+volcano he sank upon his knees. The great forests filled with wild
+and ferocious beasts, the monstrous serpents crawling in mysterious
+depths, the boundless sea, the flaming comets, the sinister
+eclipses, the awful calmness of the stars, and, more than all, the
+perpetual presence of death, convinced him that he was the sport
+and prey of unseen and malignant powers. The strange and frightful
+diseases to which he was subject, the freezings and burnings of
+fever, the contortions of epilepsy, the sudden palsies, the
+darkness of night, and the wild, terrible and fantastic dreams that
+filled his brain, satisfied him that he was haunted and pursued by
+countless spirits of evil. For some reason he supposed that these
+spirits differed in power&mdash;that they were not all alike
+malevolent&mdash;that the higher controlled the lower, and that his
+very existence depended upon gaining the assistance of the more
+powerful. For this purpose he resorted to prayer, to flattery, to
+worship and to sacrifice.</p>
+<p>These ideas appear to have been almost universal in savage
+man.</p>
+<p>For ages all nations supposed that the sick and insane were
+possessed by evil spirits. For thousands of years the practice of
+medicine consisted in frightening these spirits away. Usually the
+priests would make the loudest and most discordant noises possible.
+They would blow horns, beat upon rude drums, clash cymbals, and in
+the meantime utter the most unearthly yells. If the noise-remedy
+failed, they would implore the aid of some more powerful
+spirit.</p>
+<p>To pacify these spirits was considered of infinite importance.
+The poor barbarian, knowing that men could be softened by gifts,
+gave to these spirits that which to him seemed of the most value.
+With bursting heart he would offer the blood of his dearest child.
+It was impossible for him to conceive of a god utterly unlike
+himself, and he naturally supposed that these powers of the air
+would be affected a little at the sight of so great and so deep a
+sorrow. It was with the barbarian then as with the civilized
+now&mdash;one class lived upon and made merchandise of the fears of
+another. Certain persons took it upon themselves to appease the
+gods, and to instruct the people in their duties to these unseen
+powers. This was the origin of the priesthood. The priest pretended
+to stand between the wrath of the gods and the helplessness of man.
+He was man's attorney at the court of heaven. He carried to the
+invisible world a flag of truce, a protest and a request. He came
+back with a command, with authority and with power. Man fell upon
+his knees before his own servant, and the priest, taking advantage
+of the awe inspired by his supposed influence with the gods, made
+of his fellow-man a cringing hypocrite and slave. Even Christ, the
+supposed son of God, taught that persons were possessed of evil
+spirits, and frequently, according to the account, gave proof of
+his divine origin and mission by frightening droves of devils out
+of his unfortunate countrymen. Casting out devils was his principal
+employment, and the devils thus banished generally took occasion to
+acknowledge him as the true Messiah; which was not only very kind
+of them, but quite fortunate for him. The religious people have
+always regarded the testimony of these devils as perfectly
+conclusive, and the writers of the New Testament quote the words of
+these imps of darkness with great satisfaction.</p>
+<p>The fact that Christ could withstand the temptations of the
+devil was considered as conclusive evidence that he was assisted by
+some god, or at least by some being superior to man. St. Matthew
+gives an account of an attempt made by the devil to tempt the
+supposed son of God; and it has always excited the wonder of
+Christians that the temptation was so nobly and heroically
+withstood. The account to which I refer is as follows:</p>
+<p>"Then was Jesus led up of the spirit into the wilderness to be
+tempted of the devil. And when the tempter came to him, he said:
+'If thou be the son of God, command that these stones be made
+bread.' But he answered, and said: 'It is written: man shall not
+live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the
+mouth of God.' Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city and
+setteth him upon a pinnacle of the temple and saith unto him: 'If
+thou be the son of God, cast thyself down; for it is written, He
+shall give his angels charge concerning thee, lest at any time thou
+shalt dash thy foot against a stone,'Jesus said unto him: 'It is
+written again, thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.' Again the
+devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain and sheweth him
+all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them, and saith unto
+him: 'All these will I give thee if thou wilt fall down and worship
+me.'"</p>
+<p>The Christians now claim that Jesus was God. If he was God, of
+course the devil knew that fact, and yet, according to this
+account, the devil took 'the omnipotent God and placed him upon a
+pinnacle of the temple, and endeavored to induce him to dash
+himself against the earth. Failing in that, he took the creator,
+owner and governor of the universe up into an exceeding high
+mountain, and offered him this world&mdash;this grain of
+sand&mdash;if he, the God of all the worlds, would fall down and
+worship him, a poor devil, without even a tax title to one foot of
+dirt! Is it possible the devil was such an idiot? Should any great
+credit be given to this deity for not being caught with such chaff?
+Think of it! The devil&mdash;the prince of sharpers&mdash;the king
+of cunning&mdash;the master of finesse, trying to bribe God with a
+grain of sand that belonged to God!</p>
+<p>Is there in all the religious literature of the world anything
+more grossly absurd than this?</p>
+<p>These devils, according to the Bible, were of various
+kinds&mdash;some could speak and hear, others were deaf and dumb.
+All could not be cast out in the same way. The deaf and dumb
+spirits were quite difficult to deal with. St. Mark tells of a
+gentleman who brought his son to Christ. The boy, it seems, was
+possessed of a dumb spirit, over which the disciples had no
+control. "Jesus said unto the spirit: 'Thou dumb and deaf spirit, I
+charge thee come out of him, and enter no more into him.'"
+Whereupon, the deaf spirit (having heard what was said) cried out
+(being dumb) and immediately vacated the premises. The ease with
+which Christ controlled this deaf and dumb spirit excited the
+wonder of his disciples, and they asked him privately why they
+could not cast that spirit out. To whom he replied: "This kind can
+come forth by nothing but prayer and fasting." Is there a Christian
+in the whole world who would believe such a story if found in any
+other book? The trouble is, these pious people shut up their
+reason, and then open their Bible.</p>
+<p>In the olden times the existence of devils was universally
+admitted. The people had no doubt upon that subject, and from such
+belief it followed as a matter of course, that a person, in order
+to vanquish these devils, had either to be a god, or to be assisted
+by one. All founders of religions have established their claims to
+divine origin by controlling evil spirits and suspending the laws
+of nature. Casting out devils was a certificate of divinity. A
+prophet, unable to cope with the powers of darkness was regarded
+with contempt The utterance of the highest and noblest sentiments,
+the most blameless and holy life, commanded but little respect,
+unless accompanied by power to work miracles and command
+spirits.</p>
+<p>This belief in good and evil powers had its origin in the fact
+that man was surrounded by what he was pleased to call good and
+evil phenomena. Phenomena affecting man pleasantly were ascribed to
+good spirits, while those affecting him unpleasantly or
+injuriously, were ascribed to evil spirits. It being admitted that
+all phenomena were produced by spirits, the spirits were divided
+according to the phenomena, and the phenomena were good or bad as
+they affected man.</p>
+<p>Good spirits were supposed to be the authors of good phenomena,
+and evil spirits of the evil&mdash;so that the idea of a devil has
+been as universal as the idea of a god.</p>
+<p>Many writers maintain that an idea to become universal must be
+true; that all universal ideas are innate, and that innate ideas
+cannot be false. If the fact that an idea has been universal proves
+that it is innate, and if the fact that an idea is innate proves
+that it is correct, then the believers in innate ideas must admit
+that the evidence of a god superior to nature, and of a devil
+superior to nature, is exactly the same, and that the existence of
+such a devil must be as self-evident as the existence of such a
+god. The truth is, a god was inferred from good, and a devil from
+bad, phenomena. And it is just as natural and logical to suppose
+that a devil would cause happiness as to suppose that a god would
+produce misery. Consequently, if an intelligence, infinite and
+supreme, is the immediate author of all phenomena, it is difficult
+to determine whether such intelligence is the friend or enemy of
+man. If phenomena were all good, we might say they were all
+produced by a perfectly beneficent being. If they were all bad, we
+might say they were produced by a perfectly malevolent power; but,
+as phenomena are, as they affect man, both good and bad, they must
+be produced by different and antagonistic spirits; by one who is
+sometimes actuated by kindness, and sometimes by malice; or all
+must be produced of necessity, and without reference to their
+consequences upon man.</p>
+<p>The foolish doctrine that all phenomena can be traced to the
+interference of good and evil spirits, has been, and still is,
+almost universal. That most people still believe in some spirit
+that can change the natural order of events, is proven by the fact
+that nearly all resort to prayer. Thousands, at this very moment,
+are probably imploring some supposed power to interfere in their
+behalf. Some want health restored; some ask that the loved and
+absent be watched over and protected, some pray for riches, some
+for rain, some want diseases stayed, some vainly ask for food, some
+ask for revivals, a few ask for more wisdom, and now and then one
+tells the Lord to do as he may think best. Thousands ask to be
+protected from the devil; some, like David, pray for revenge, and
+some implore even God, not to lead them into temptation. All these
+prayers rest upon, and are produced by, the idea that some power
+not only can, but probably will, change the order of the universe.
+This belief has been among the great majority of tribes and
+nations. All sacred books are filled with the accounts of such
+interferences, and our own Bible is no exception to this rule.</p>
+<p>If we believe in a power superior to nature, it is perfectly
+natural to suppose that such power can and will interfere in the
+affairs of this world. If there is no interference, of what
+practical use can such power be? The Scriptures give us the most
+wonderful accounts of divine interference: Animals talk like men;
+springs gurgle from dry bones; the sun and moon stop in the heavens
+in order that General Joshua may have more time to murder; the
+shadow on a dial goes back ten degrees to convince a petty king of
+a barbarous people that he is not going to die of a boil; fire
+refuses to burn; water positively declines to seek its level, but
+stands up like a wall; grains of sand become lice; common
+walking-sticks, to gratify a mere freak, twist themselves into
+serpents, and then swallow each other by way of exercise; murmuring
+streams, laughing at the attraction of gravitation, run up hill for
+years, following wandering tribes from a pure love of frolic;
+prophecy becomes altogether easier than history; the sons of God
+become enamored of the world's girls; women are changed into salt
+for the purpose of keeping a great event fresh in the minds of men;
+an excellent article of brimstone is imported from heaven free of
+duty; clothes refuse to wear out for forty years; birds keep
+restaurants and feed wandering prophets free of expense; bears tear
+children in pieces for laughing at old men without wigs; muscular
+development depends upon the length of one's hair; dead people come
+to life, simply to get a joke on their enemies and heirs; witches
+and wizards converse freely with the souls of the departed, and God
+himself becomes a stone-cutter and engraver, after having been a
+tailor and dressmaker.</p>
+<p>The veil between heaven and earth was always rent or lifted. The
+shadows of this world, the radiance of heaven, and the glare of
+hell mixed and mingled until man became uncertain as to which
+country he really inhabited. Man dwelt in an unreal world. He
+mistook his ideas, his dreams, for real things. His fears became
+terrible and malicious monsters. He lived in the midst of furies
+and fairies, nymphs and naiads, goblins and ghosts, witches and
+wizards, sprites and spooks, deities and devils. The obscure and
+gloomy depths were filled with claw and wing&mdash;with beak and
+hoof&mdash;with leering looks and sneering mouths&mdash;with the
+malice of deformity&mdash;with the cunning of hatred, and with all
+the slimy forms that fear can draw and paint upon the shadowy
+canvas of the dark.</p>
+<p>It is enough to make one almost insane with pity to think what
+man in the long night has suffered; of the tortures he has endured,
+surrounded, as he supposed, by malignant powers and clutched by the
+fierce phantoms of the air. No wonder that he fell upon his
+trembling knees&mdash;that he built altars and reddened them even
+with his own blood. No wonder that he implored ignorant priests and
+impudent magicians for aid. No wonder that he crawled groveling in
+the dust to the temple's door, and there, in the insanity of
+despair, besought the deaf gods to hear his bitter cry of agony and
+fear.</p>
+<p>The savage as he emerges from a state of barbarism, gradually
+loses faith in his idols of wood and stone, and in their place puts
+a multitude of spirits. As he advances in knowledge, he generally
+discards the petty spirits, and in their stead believes in one,
+whom he supposes to be infinite and supreme. Supposing this great
+spirit to be superior to nature, he offers worship or flattery in
+exchange for assistance. At last, finding that he obtains no aid
+from this supposed deity&mdash;: finding that every search after
+the absolute must of necessity end in failure&mdash;finding that
+man cannot by any possibility conceive of the
+conditionless&mdash;he begins to investigate the facts by which he
+is surrounded, and to depend upon himself.</p>
+<p>The people are beginning to think, to reason and to investigate.
+Slowly, painfully, but surely, the gods are being driven from the
+earth. Only upon rare occasions are they, even by the most
+religious, supposed to interfere in the affairs of men. In most
+matters we are at last supposed to be free. Since the invention of
+steamships and railways, so that the products of all countries can
+be easily interchanged, the gods have quit the business of
+producing famine. Now and then they kill a child because it is
+idolized by its parents. As a rule they have given up causing
+accidents on railroads, exploding boilers, and bursting kerosene
+lamps. Cholera, yellow fever, and small-pox are still considered
+heavenly weapons; but measles, itch and ague are now attributed to
+natural causes. As a general thing, the gods have stopped drowning
+children, except as a punishment for violating the Sabbath. They
+still pay some attention to the affairs of kings, men of genius and
+persons of great wealth; but ordinary people are left to shirk for
+themselves as best they may. In wars between great nations, the
+gods still interfere; but in prize fights, the best man with an
+honest referee, is almost sure to win.</p>
+<p>The church cannot abandon the idea of special providence. To
+give up that doctrine is to give up all. The church must insist
+that prayer is answered&mdash;that some power superior to nature
+hears and grants the request of the sincere and humble Christian,
+and that this same power in some mysterious way provides for
+all.</p>
+<p>A devout clergyman sought every opportunity to impress upon the
+mind of his son the fact, that God takes care of all his creatures;
+that the falling sparrow attracts his attention, and that his
+loving kindness is over all his works. Happening, one day, to see a
+crane wading in quest of food, the good man pointed out to his son
+the perfect adaptation of the crane to get his living in that
+manner. "See," said he, "how his legs are formed for wading! What a
+long slender bill he has! Observe how nicely he folds his feet when
+putting them in or drawing them out of the water! He does not cause
+the slightest ripple. He is thus enabled to approach the fish
+without giving them any notice of his arrival." "My son," said he,
+"it is impossible to look at that bird without recognizing the
+design, as well as the goodness of God, in thus providing the means
+of subsistence." "Yes," replied the boy, "I think I see the
+goodness of God, at least so far as the crane is concerned; but
+after all, father, don't you think the arrangement a little tough
+on the fish?"</p>
+<p>Even the advanced religionist, although disbelieving in any
+great amount of interference by the gods in this age of the world,
+still thinks, that in the beginning, some god made the laws
+governing the universe. He believes that in consequence of these
+laws a man can lift a greater weight with, than without, a lever;
+that this god so made matter, and so established the order of
+things, that two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same
+time; so that a body once put in motion will keep moving until it
+is stopped; so that it is a greater distance around, than across a
+circle; so that a perfect square has four equal sides, instead of
+five or seven. He insists that it took a direct interposition of
+Providence to make the whole greater than a part, and that had it
+not been for this power superior to nature, twice one might have
+been more than twice two, and sticks and strings might have had
+only one end apiece. Like the old Scotch divine, he thanks God that
+Sunday comes at the end instead of in the middle of the week, and
+that death comes at the close instead of at the commencement of
+life, thereby giving us time to prepare for that holy day and that
+most solemn event These religious people see nothing but design
+everywhere, and personal, intelligent interference in everything.
+They insist that the universe has been created, and that the
+adaptation of means to ends is perfectly apparent. They point us to
+the sunshine, to the flowers, to the April rain, and to all there
+is of beauty and of use in the world. Did it ever occur to them
+that a cancer is as beautiful in its development as is the reddest
+rose? That what they are pleased to call the adaptation of means to
+ends, is as apparent in the cancer as in the April rain? How
+beautiful the process of digestion! By what ingenious methods the
+blood is poisoned so that the cancer shall have food! By what
+wonderful contrivances the entire system of man is made to pay
+tribute to this divine and charming cancer! See by what admirable
+instrumentalities it feeds itself from the surrounding quivering,
+dainty flesh! See how it gradually but surely expands and grows! By
+what marvelous mechanism it is supplied with long and slender roots
+that reach out to the most secret nerves of pain for sustenance and
+life! What beautiful colors it presents! Seen through the
+microscope it is a miracle of order and beauty. All the ingenuity
+of man cannot stop its growth. Think of the amount of thought it
+must have required to invent a way by which the life of one man
+might be given to produce one cancer? Is it possible to look upon
+it and doubt that there is design in the universe, and that the
+inventor of this wonderful cancer must be infinitely powerful,
+ingenious and good?</p>
+<p>We are told that the universe was designed and created, and that
+it is absurd to suppose that matter has existed from eternity, but
+that it is perfectly self-evident that a god has.</p>
+<p>If a god created the universe, then, there must have been a time
+when he commenced to create. Back of that time there must have been
+an eternity, during which there had existed
+nothing&mdash;absolutely nothing&mdash;except this supposed god.
+According to this theory, this god spent an eternity, so to speak,
+in an infinite vacuum, and in perfect idleness.</p>
+<p>Admitting that a god did create the universe, the question then
+arises, of what did he create it? It certainly was not made of
+nothing. Nothing, considered in the light of a raw material, is a
+most decided failure. It follows, then, that the god must have made
+the universe out of himself, he being the only existence. The
+universe is material, and if it was made of god, the god must have
+been material. With this very thought in his mind, Anaximander of
+Miletus said: "Creation is the decomposition of the infinite."</p>
+<p>It has been demonstrated that the earth would fall to the sun,
+only for the fact, that it is attracted by other worlds, and those
+worlds must be attracted by other worlds still beyond them, and so
+on, without end. This proves the material universe to be infinite.
+If an infinite universe has been made out of an infinite god, how
+much of the god is left?</p>
+<p>The idea of a creative deity is gradually being abandoned, and
+nearly all truly scientific minds admit that matter must have
+existed from eternity. It is indestructible, and the indestructible
+cannot be created. It is the crowning glory of our century to have
+demonstrated the indestructibility and the eternal persistence of
+force. Neither matter nor force can be increased nor diminished.
+Force cannot exist apart from matter. Matter exists only in
+connection with force, and consequently, a force apart from matter,
+and superior to nature, is a demonstrated impossibility.</p>
+<p>Force, then, must have also existed from eternity, and could not
+have been created. Matter in its countless forms, from dead earth
+to the eyes of those we love, and force, in all its manifestations,
+from simple motion to the grandest thought, deny creation and defy
+control.</p>
+<p>Thought is a form of force. We walk with the same force with
+which we think. Man is an organism, that changes several forms of
+force into thought-force. Man is a machine into which we put what
+we call food, and produce what we call thought. Think of that
+wonderful chemistry by which bread was changed into the divine
+tragedy of Hamlet!</p>
+<p>A god must not only be material, but he must be an organism,
+capable of changing other forms of force into thought-force. This
+is what we call eating. Therefore, if the god thinks, he must eat,
+that is to say, he must of necessity have some means of supplying
+the force with which to think. It is impossible to conceive of a
+being who can eternally impart force to matter, and yet have no
+means of supplying the force thus imparted.</p>
+<p>If neither matter nor force were created, what evidence have we,
+then, of the existence of a power superior to nature? The
+theologian will probably reply, "We have law and order, cause and
+effect, and beside all this, matter could not have put itself in
+motion."</p>
+<p>Suppose, for the sake of the argument, that there is no being
+superior to nature, and that matter and force have existed from
+eternity. Now, suppose that two atoms should come together, would
+there be an effect? Yes. Suppose they came in exactly opposite
+directions with equal force, they would be stopped, to say the
+least. This would be an effect. If this is so, then you have
+matter, force and effect without a being superior to nature. Now,
+suppose that two other atoms, just like the first two, should come
+together under precisely the same circumstances, would not the
+effect be exactly the same? Yes. Like causes, producing like
+effects, is what we mean by law and order. Then we have matter,
+force, effect, law and order without a being superior to nature.
+Now, we know that every effect must also be a cause, and that every
+cause must be an effect. The atoms coming together did produce an
+effect, and as every effect must also be a cause, the effect
+produced by the collision of the atoms, must as to something else
+have been a cause. Then we have matter, force, law, order, cause
+and effect without a being superior to nature. Nothing is left for
+the supernatural but empty space. His throne is a void, and his
+boasted realm is without matter, without force, without law,
+without cause, and without effect.</p>
+<p>But what put all this matter in motion? If matter and force have
+existed from eternity, then matter must have always been in motion.
+There can be no force without motion. Force is forever active, and
+there is, and there can be no cessation. If, therefore, matter and
+force have existed from eternity, so has motion. In the whole
+universe there is not even one atom in a state of rest.</p>
+<p>A deity outside of nature exists in nothing, and is nothing.
+Nature embraces with infinite arms all matter and all force. That
+which is beyond her grasp is destitute of both, and can hardly be
+worth the worship and adoration even of a man.</p>
+<p>There is but one way to demonstrate the existence of a power
+independent of and superior to nature, and that is by breaking, if
+only for one moment, the continuity of cause and effect Pluck from
+the endless chain of existence one little link; stop for one
+instant the grand procession, and you have shown beyond all
+contradiction that nature has a master. Change the fact, just for
+one second, that matter attracts matter, and a god appears.</p>
+<p>The rudest savage has always known this fact, and for that
+reason always demanded the evidence of miracle. The founder of a
+religion must be able to turn water into wine&mdash;cure with a
+word the blind and lame, and raise with a simple touch the dead to
+life. It was necessary for him to demonstrate to the satisfaction
+of his barbarian disciple, that he was superior to nature. In times
+of ignorance this was easy to do. The credulity of the savage was
+almost boundless. To him the marvelous was the beautiful, the
+mysterious was the sublime. Consequently, every religion has for
+its foundation a miracle&mdash;that is to say, a violation of
+nature&mdash;that is to say, a falsehood.</p>
+<p>No one, in the world's whole history, ever attempted to
+substantiate a truth by a miracle. Truth scorns the assistance of
+miracle. Nothing but falsehood ever attested itself by signs and
+wonders. No miracle ever was performed, and no sane man ever
+thought he had performed one, and until one is performed, there can
+be no evidence of the existence of any power superior to and
+independent of nature.</p>
+<p>The church wishes us to believe. Let the church, or one of its
+intellectual saints, perform a miracle, and we will believe. We are
+told that nature has a superior. Let this superior, for one single
+instant, control nature, and we will admit the truth of your
+assertions.</p>
+<p>We have heard talk enough. We have listened to all the drowsy,
+idealess, vapid sermons that we wish to hear. We have read your
+Bible and the works of your best minds. We have heard your prayers,
+your solemn groans and your reverential amens. All these amount to
+less than nothing. We want one fact. We beg at the doors of your
+churches for just one little fact We pass our hats along your pews
+and under your pulpits and implore you for just one fact We know
+all about your mouldy wonders and your stale miracles. We want a
+this year's fact. We ask only one. Give us one fact for charity.
+Your miracles are too ancient. The witnesses have been dead for
+nearly two thousand years. Their reputation for "truth and
+veracity" in the neighborhood where they resided is wholly unknown
+to us. Give us a new miracle, and substantiate it by witnesses who
+still have the cheerful habit of living in this world. Do not send
+us to Jericho to hear the winding horns, nor put us in the fire
+with Shadrach, Meshech, and Abednego. Do not compel us to navigate
+the sea with Captain Jonah, nor dine with Mr. Ezekiel. There is no
+sort of use in sending us fox-hunting with Samson. We have
+positively lost all interest in that little speech so eloquently
+delivered by Balaam's inspired donkey. It is worse than useless to
+show us fishes with money in their mouths, and call our attention
+to vast multitudes stuffing themselves with five crackers and two
+sardines. We demand a new miracle, and we demand it now. Let the
+church furnish at least one, or forever after hold her peace.</p>
+<p>In the olden time, the church, by violating the order of nature,
+proved the existence of her God. At that time miracles were
+performed with the most astonishing ease. They became so common
+that the church ordered her priests to desist. And now this same
+church&mdash;the people having found some little
+sense&mdash;admits, not only, that she cannot perform a miracle,
+but insists that the absence of miracle&mdash;the steady, unbroken
+march of cause and effect, proves the existence of a power superior
+to nature. The fact is, however, that the indissoluble chain of
+cause and effect proves exactly the contrary.</p>
+<p>Sir William Hamilton, one of the pillars of modern theology, in
+discussing this very subject, uses the following language: "The
+phenomena of matter taken by themselves, so far from warranting any
+inference to the existence of a god, would on the contrary ground
+even an argument to his negation. The phenomena of the material
+world are subjected to immutable laws; are produced and reproduced
+in the same invariable succession, and manifest only the blind
+force of a mechanical necessity."</p>
+<p>Nature is but an endless series of efficient causes. She cannot
+create, but she eternally transforms. There was no beginning, and
+there can be no end.</p>
+<p>The best minds, even in the religious world, admit that in
+material nature there is no evidence of what they are pleased to
+call a god. They find their evidence in the phenomena of
+intelligence, and very innocently assert that intelligence is
+above, and in fact, opposed to nature. They insist that man, at
+least, is a special creation; that he has somewhere in his brain a
+divine spark, a little portion of the "Great First Cause." They say
+that matter cannot produce thought; but that thought can produce
+matter. They tell us that man has intelligence, and therefore there
+must be an intelligence greater than his. Why not say, God has
+intelligence, therefore there must be an intelligence greater than
+his? So far as we know, there is no intelligence apart from matter.
+We cannot conceive of thought, except as produced within a
+brain.</p>
+<p>The science, by means of which they demonstrate the existence of
+an impossible intelligence, and an incomprehensible power is
+called, metaphysics or theology. The theologians admit that the
+phenomena of matter tend, at least, to disprove the existence of
+any power superior to nature, because in such phenomena we see
+nothing but an endless chain of efficient causes&mdash;nothing but
+the force of a mechanical necessity. They therefore appeal to what
+they denominate the phenomena of mind to establish this superior
+power.</p>
+<p>The trouble is, that in the phenomena of mind we find the same
+endless chain of efficient causes; the same mechanical necessity.
+Every thought must have had an efficient cause. Every motive, every
+desire, every fear, hope and dream must have been necessarily
+produced. There is no room in the mind of man for providence or
+chance. The facts and forces governing thought are as absolute as
+those governing the motions of the planets. A poem is produced by
+the forces of nature, and is as necessarily and naturally produced
+as mountains and seas. You will seek in vain for a thought in man's
+brain without its efficient cause. Every mental operation is the
+necessary result of certain facts and conditions. Mental phenomena
+are considered more complicated than those of matter, and
+consequently more mysterious. Being more mysterious, they are
+considered better evidence of the existence of a god. No one infers
+a god from the simple, from the known, from what is understood, but
+from the complex, from the unknown, and, incomprehensible. Our
+ignorance is God; what we know is science.</p>
+<p>When we abandon the doctrine that some infinite being created
+matter and force, and enacted a code of laws for their government,
+the idea of interference will be lost. The real priest will then
+be, not the mouth-piece of some pretended deity, but the
+interpreter of nature. From that moment the church ceases to exist.
+The tapers will die out upon the dusty altar; the moths will eat
+the fading velvet of pulpit and pew; the Bible will take its place
+with the Shastras, Puranas, Vedas, Eddas, Sagas and Korans, and the
+fetters of a degrading faith will fall from the minds of men.</p>
+<p>"But," says the religionist, "you cannot explain everything; you
+cannot understand everything; and that which you cannot explain,
+that which you do not comprehend, is my God."</p>
+<p>We are explaining more every day. We are understanding more
+every day; consequently your God is growing smaller every day.</p>
+<p>Nothing daunted, the religionist then insists that nothing can
+exist without a cause, except cause, and that this uncaused cause
+is God.</p>
+<p>To this we again reply: Every cause must produce an effect,
+because until it does produce an effect, it is not a cause. Every
+effect must in its turn become a cause. Therefore, in the nature of
+things, there cannot be a last cause, for the reason that a
+so-called last cause would necessarily produce an effect, and that
+effect must of necessity becomes a cause. The converse of these
+propositions must be true. Every effect must have had a cause, and
+every cause must have been an effect. Therefore there could have
+been no first cause. A first cause is just as impossible as a last
+effect.</p>
+<p>Beyond the universe there is nothing, and within the universe
+the supernatural does not and cannot exist.</p>
+<p>The moment these great truths are understood and admitted, a
+belief in general or special providence become impossible. From
+that instant men will cease their vain efforts to please an
+imaginary being, and will give their time and attention to the
+affairs of this world. They will abandon the idea of attaining any
+object by prayer and supplication. The element of uncertainty will,
+in a great measure, be removed from the domain of the future, and
+man, gathering courage from a succession of victories over the
+obstructions of nature, will attain a serene grandeur unknown to
+the disciples of any superstition. The plans of mankind will no
+longer be interfered with by the finger of a supposed omnipotence,
+and no one will believe that nations or individuals are protected
+or destroyed by any deity whatever. Science, freed from the chains
+of pious custom and evangelical prejudice, will, within her sphere,
+be supreme. The mind will investigate without reverence, and
+publish its conclusions without fear. Agassiz will no longer
+hesitate to declare the Mosaic cosmogony utterly inconsistent with
+the demonstrated truths of geology, and will cease pretending any
+reverence for the Jewish Scriptures. The moment science succeeds in
+rendering the church powerless for evil, the real thinkers will be
+outspoken. The little flags of truce carried by timid philosophers
+will disappear, and the cowardly parley will give place to
+victory&mdash;lasting and universal.</p>
+<p>If we admit that some infinite being has controlled the
+destinies of persons and peoples, history becomes a most cruel and
+bloody farce. Age after age, the strong have trampled upon the
+weak; the crafty and heartless have ensnared and enslaved the
+simple and innocent, and nowhere, in all the annals of mankind, has
+any god succored the oppressed.</p>
+<p>Man should cease to expect aid from on high. By this time he
+should know that heaven has no ear to hear, and no hand to help.
+The present is the necessary child of all the past. There has been
+no chance, and there can be no interference.</p>
+<p>If abuses are destroyed, man must destroy them. If slaves are
+freed, man must free them. If new truths are discovered, man must
+discover them. If the naked are clothed; if the hungry are fed; if
+justice is done; if labor is rewarded; if superstition is driven
+from the mind; if the defenceless are protected and if the right
+finally triumphs, all must be the work of man. The grand victories
+of the future must be won by man, and by man alone.</p>
+<p>Nature, so far as we can discern, without passion and without
+intention, forms, transforms, and retransforms forever. She neither
+weeps nor rejoices. She produces man without purpose, and
+obliterates him without regret. She knows no distinction between
+the beneficial and the hurtful. Poison and nutrition, pain and joy,
+life and death, smiles and tears are alike to her. She is neither
+merciful nor cruel. She cannot be flattered by worship nor melted
+by tears. She does not know even the attitude of prayer. She
+appreciates no difference between poison in the fangs of snakes and
+mercy in the hearts of men. Only through man does nature take
+cognizance of the good, the true, and the beautiful; and, so far as
+we know, man is the highest intelligence.</p>
+<p>And yet man continues to believe that there is some power
+independent of and superior to nature, and still endeavors, by
+form, ceremony, supplication, hypocrisy and sacrifice, to obtain
+its aid. His best energies have been wasted in the service of this
+phantom. The horrors of witchcraft were all born of an ignorant
+belief in the existence of a totally depraved being superior to
+nature, acting in perfect independence of her laws; and all
+religious superstition has had for its basis a belief in at least
+two beings, one good and the other bad, both of whom could
+arbitrarily change the order of the universe. The history of
+religion is simply the story of man's efforts in all ages to avoid
+one of these powers, and to pacify the other. Both powers have
+inspired little else than abject fear. The cold, calculating sneer
+of the devil, and the frown of God, were equally terrible. In any
+event, man's fate was to be arbitrarily fixed forever by an unknown
+power superior to all law, and to all fact. Until this belief is
+thrown aside, man must consider himself the slave of phantom
+masters&mdash;neither of whom promise liberty in this world nor in
+the next.</p>
+<p>Man must learn to rely upon himself. Reading bibles will not
+protect him from the blasts of winter, but houses, fires, and
+clothing will. To prevent famine, one plow is worth a million
+sermons, and even patent medicines will cure more diseases than all
+the prayers uttered since the beginning of the world.</p>
+<p>Although many eminent men have endeavored to harmonize necessity
+and free will, the existence of evil, and the infinite power and
+good ness of God, they have succeeded only in producing learned and
+ingenious failures. Immense efforts have been made to reconcile
+ideas utterly inconsistent with the facts by which we are
+surrounded, and all persons who have failed to perceive the
+pretended reconciliation, have been denounced as infidels, atheists
+and scoffers. The whole power of the church has been brought to
+bear against philosophers and scientists in order to compel a
+denial of the authority of demonstration, and to induce some Judas
+to betray Reason, one of the saviors of mankind.</p>
+<p>During that frightful period known as the "Dark Ages," Faith
+reigned, with scarcely a rebellious subject. Her temples were
+"carpeted with knees," and the wealth of nations adorned her
+countless shrines. The great painters prostituted their genius to
+immortalize her vagaries, while the poets enshrined them in song.
+At her bidding, man covered the earth with blood. The scales of
+Justice were turned with her gold, and for her use were invented
+all the cunning instruments of pain. She built cathedrals for God,
+and dungeons for men. She peopled the clouds with angels and the
+earth with slaves. For centuries the world was retracing its
+steps&mdash;going steadily back toward barbaric night! A few
+infidels&mdash;a few heretics cried, "Halt!" to the great rabble of
+ignorant devotion, and made it possible for the genius of the
+nineteenth century to revolutionize the cruel creeds and
+superstitions of mankind.</p>
+<p>The thoughts of man, in order to be of any real worth, must be
+free. Under the influence of fear the brain is paralyzed, and
+instead of bravely solving a problem for itself, tremblingly adopts
+the solution of another. As long as a majority of men will cringe
+to the very earth before some petty prince or king, what must be
+the infinite abjectness of their little souls in the presence of
+their supposed creator and God? Under such circumstances, what can
+their thoughts be worth?</p>
+<p>The originality of repetition, and the mental vigor of
+acquiescence, are all that we have any right to expect from the
+Christian world. As long as every question is answered by the word
+"God," scientific inquiry is simply impossible. As fast as
+phenomena are satisfactorily explained the domain of the power,
+supposed to be superior to nature must decrease, while the horizon
+of the known must as constantly continue to enlarge.</p>
+<p>It is no longer satisfactory to account for the fall and rise of
+nations by saying, "It is the will of God." Such an explanation
+puts ignorance and education upon an exact equality, and does away
+with the idea of really accounting for anything whatever.</p>
+<p>Will the religionist pretend that the real end of science is to
+ascertain how and why God acts? Science, from such a standpoint
+would consist in investigating the law of arbitrary action, and in
+a grand endeavor to ascertain the rules necessarily obeyed by
+infinite caprice.</p>
+<p>From a philosophical point of view, science is knowledge of the
+laws of life; of the conditions of happiness; of the facts by which
+we are surrounded, and the relations we sustain to men and
+things&mdash;by means of which, man, so to speak, subjugates nature
+and bends the elemental powers to his will, making blind force the
+servant of his brain.</p>
+<p>A belief in special providence does away with the spirit of
+investigation, and is inconsistent with personal effort. Why should
+man endeavor to thwart the designs of God? Which of you, by taking
+thought, can add one cubit to his stature? Under the influence of
+this belief, man, basking in the sunshine of a delusion, considers
+the lilies of the field and refuses to take any thought for the
+morrow. Believing himself in the power of an infinite being, who
+can, at any moment, dash him to the lowest hell or raise him to the
+highest heaven, he necessarily abandons the idea of accomplishing
+anything by his own efforts. As long as this belief was general,
+the world was filled with ignorance, superstition and misery. The
+energies of man were wasted in a vain effort to obtain the aid of
+this power, supposed to be superior to nature. For countless ages,
+even men were sacrificed upon the altar of this impossible god. To
+please him, mothers have shed the blood of their own babes; martyrs
+have chanted triumphant songs in the midst of flame; priests have
+gorged themselves with blood; nuns have forsworn the ecstasies of
+love; old men have tremblingly implored; women have sobbed and
+entreated; every pain has been endured, and every horror has been
+perpetrated.</p>
+<p>Through the dim long years that have fled, humanity has suffered
+more than can be conceived. Most of the misery has been endured by
+the weak, the loving and the innocent Women have been treated like
+poisonous beasts, and little children trampled upon as though they
+had been vermin. Numberless altars have been reddened, even with
+the blood of babes; beautiful girls have been given to slimy
+serpents; whole races of men doomed to centuries of slavery, and
+everywhere there has been outrage beyond the power of genius to
+express. During all these years the suffering have supplicated; the
+withered lips of famine have prayed; the pale victims have
+implored, and Heaven has been deaf and blind.</p>
+<p>Of what use have the gods been to man?</p>
+<p>It is no answer to say that some god created the world,
+established certain laws, and then turned his attention to other
+matters, leaving his children weak, ignorant and unaided, to fight
+the battle of life alone. It is no solution to declare that in
+some, other world this god will render a few, or even all, his
+subjects happy. What right have we to expect that a perfectly wise,
+good and powerful being will ever do better than he has done, and
+is doing? The world is filled with imperfections. If it was made by
+an infinite being, what reason have we for saying that he will
+render it nearer perfect than it now is? If the infinite "Father"
+allows a majority of his children to live in ignorance and
+wretchedness now, what evidence is there that he will ever improve
+their condition? Will God have more power? Will he become more
+merciful? Will his love for his poor creatures increase? Can the
+conduct of infinite wisdom, power and love ever change? Is the
+infinite capable of any improvement whatever?</p>
+<p>We are informed by the clergy that this world is a kind of
+school; that the evils by which we are surrounded are for the
+purpose of developing our souls, and that only by suffering can men
+become pure, strong, virtuous and grand.</p>
+<p>Supposing this to be true, what is to become of those who die in
+infancy? The little children, according to this philosophy, can
+never be developed. They were so unfortunate as to escape the
+ennobling influences of pain and misery, and as a consequence, are
+doomed to an eternity of mental inferiority. If the clergy are
+right on this question, none are so unfortunate as the happy, and
+we should envy only the suffering and distressed. If evil is
+necessary to the development of man, in this life, how is it
+possible for the soul to improve in the perfect joy of
+Paradise?</p>
+<p>Since Paley found his watch, the argument of "design" has been
+relied upon as unanswerable. The church teaches that this world,
+and all that it contains, were created substantially as we now see
+them; that the grasses, the flowers, the trees, and all animals,
+including man, were special creations, and that they sustain no
+necessary relation to each other. The most orthodox will admit that
+some earth has been washed into the sea; that the sea has
+encroached a little upon the land, and that some mountains may be a
+trifle lower than in the morning of creation. The theory of gradual
+development was unknown to our fathers; the idea of evolution did
+not occur to them. Our fathers looked upon the then arrangement of
+things as the primal arrangement. The earth appeared to them fresh
+from the hands of a deity. They knew nothing of the slow evolutions
+of countless years, but supposed that the almost infinite variety
+of vegetable and animal forms had existed from the first.</p>
+<p>Suppose that upon some island we should find a man a million
+years of age, and suppose that we should find him in the possession
+of a most beautiful carriage, constructed upon the most perfect
+model. And suppose, further, that he should tell us that it was the
+result of several hundred thousand years of labor and of thought;
+that for fifty thousand years he used as flat a log as he could
+find, before it occurred to him, that by splitting the log, he
+could have the same surface with only half the weight; that it took
+him many thousand years to invent wheels for this log; that the
+wheels he first used were solid, and that fifty thousand years of
+thought suggested the use of spokes and tire; that for many
+centuries he used the wheels without linch-pins; that it took a
+hundred thousand years more to think of using four wheels, instead
+of two; that for ages he walked behind the carriage, when going
+down hill, in order to hold it back, and that only by a lucky
+chance he invented the tongue; would we conclude that this man,
+from the very first, had been an infinitely ingenious and perfect
+mechanic? Suppose we found him living in an elegant mansion, and he
+should inform us that he lived in that house for five hundred
+thousand years before he thought of putting on a roof, and that he
+had but recently invented windows and doors; would we say that from
+the beginning he had been an infinitely accomplished and scientific
+architect?</p>
+<p>Does not an improvement in the things created, show a
+corresponding improvement in the creator?</p>
+<p>Would an infinitely wise, good and powerful God, intending to
+produce man, commence with the lowest possible forms of life; with
+the simplest organism that can be imagined, and during immeasurable
+periods of time, slowly and almost imperceptibly improve upon the
+rude beginning, until man was evolved? Would countless ages thus be
+wasted in the production of awkward forms, afterwards abandoned?
+Can the intelligence of man discover the least wisdom in covering
+the earth with crawling, creeping horrors, that live only upon the
+agonies and pangs of others? Can we see the propriety of so
+constructing the earth, that only an insignificant portion of its
+surface is capable of producing an intelligent man? Who can
+appreciate the mercy of so making the world that all animals devour
+animals; so that every mouth is a slaughterhouse, and every stomach
+a tomb? Is it possible to discover infinite intelligence and love
+in universal and eternal carnage?</p>
+<p>What would we think of a father, who should give a farm to his
+children, and before giving them possession should plant upon it
+thousands of deadly shrubs and vines; should stock it with
+ferocious beasts, and poisonous reptiles; should take pains to put
+a few swamps in the neighborhood to breed malaria; should so
+arrange matters, that the ground would occasionally open and
+swallow a few of his darlings, and besides all this, should
+establish a few volcanoes in the immediate vicinity, that might at
+any moment overwhelm his children with rivers of fire? Suppose that
+this father neglected to tell his children which of the plants were
+deadly; that the reptiles were poisonous; failed to say anything
+about the earthquakes, and kept the volcano business a profound
+secret; would we pronounce him angel or fiend?</p>
+<p>And yet this is exactly what the orthodox God has done.</p>
+<p>According to the theologians, God prepared this globe expressly
+for the habitation of his loved children, and yet he filled the
+forests with ferocious beasts; placed serpents in every path;
+stuffed the world with earthquakes, and adorned its surface with
+mountains of flame.</p>
+<p>Notwithstanding all this, we are told that the world is perfect;
+that it was created by a perfect being, and is therefore
+necessarily perfect. The next moment, these same persons will tell
+us that the world was cursed; covered with brambles, thistles and
+thorns, and that man was doomed to disease and death, simply
+because our poor, dear mother ate an apple contrary to the command
+of an arbitrary God.</p>
+<p>A very pious friend of mine, having heard that I had said the
+world was full of imperfections, asked me if the report was true.
+Upon being informed that it was, he expressed great surprise that
+any one could be guilty of such presumption. He said that, in his
+judgment, it was impossible to point out an imperfection. "Be kind
+enough," said he, "to name even one improvement that you could
+make, if you had the power." "Well," said I, "I would make good
+health catching, instead of disease." The truth is, it is
+impossible to harmonize all the ills, and pains, and agonies of
+this world with the idea that we were created by, and are watched
+over and protected by an infinitely wise, powerful and beneficent
+God, who is superior to and independent of nature.</p>
+<p>The clergy, however, balance all the real ills of this life with
+the expected joys of the next. We are assured that all is
+perfection in heaven&mdash;there the skies are
+cloudless&mdash;there all is serenity and peace. Here empires may
+be overthrown; dynasties may be extinguished in blood; millions of
+slaves may toil 'neath the fierce rays of the sun, and the cruel
+strokes of the lash; yet all is happiness in heaven. Pestilences
+may strew the earth with corpses of the loved; the survivors may
+bend above them in agony&mdash;yet the placid bosom of heaven is
+unruffled. Children may expire vainly asking for bread; babes may
+be devoured by serpents, while the gods sit smiling in the clouds.
+The innocent may languish unto death in the obscurity of dungeons;
+brave men and heroic women may be changed to ashes at the bigot's
+stake, while heaven is filled with song and joy. Out on the wide
+sea, in darkness and in storm, the shipwrecked struggle with the
+cruel waves while the angels play upon their golden harps. The
+streets of the world are filled with the diseased, the deformed and
+the helpless; the chambers of pain are crowded with the pale forms
+of the suffering, while the angels float and fly in the happy
+realms of day. In heaven they are too happy to have sympathy; too
+busy singing to aid the imploring and distressed. Their eyes are
+blinded; their ears are stopped and their hearts are turned to
+stone by the infinite selfishness of joy. The saved mariner is too
+happy when he touches the shore to give a moment's thought to his
+drowning brothers. With the indifference of happiness, with the
+contempt of bliss, heaven barely glances at the miseries of earth.
+Cities are devoured by the rushing lava; the earth opens and
+thousands perish; women raise their clasped hands towards heaven,
+but the gods are too happy to aid their children. The smiles of the
+deities are unacquainted with the tears of men. The shouts of
+heaven drown the sobs of earth.</p>
+<p>Having shown how man created gods, and how he became the
+trembling slave of his own creation, the questions naturally arise:
+How did he free himself even a little, from these monarchs of the
+sky, from these despots of the clouds, from this aristocracy of the
+air? How did he, even to the extent that he has, outgrow his
+ignorant, abject terror, and throw off the yoke of
+superstition?</p>
+<p>Probably, the first thing that tended to disabuse his mind was
+the discovery of order, of regularity, of periodicity in the
+universe. From this he began to suspect that everything did not
+happen purely with reference to him. He noticed, that whatever he
+might do, the motions of the planets were always the same; that
+eclipses were periodical, and that even comets came at certain
+intervals. This convinced him that eclipses and comets had nothing
+to do with him, and that his conduct had nothing to do with them.
+He perceived that they were not caused for his benefit or injury.
+He thus learned to regard them with admiration instead of fear. He
+began to suspect that famine was not sent by some enraged and
+revengeful deity, but resuited often from the neglect and ignorance
+of man. He learned that diseases were not produced by evil spirits.
+He found that sickness was occasioned by natural causes, and could
+be cured by natural means. He demonstrated, to his own satisfaction
+at least, that prayer is not a medicine. He found by sad experience
+that his gods were of no practical use, as they never assisted him,
+except when he was perfectly able to help himself. At last, he
+began to discover that his individual action had nothing whatever
+to do with strange appearances in the heavens; that it was
+impossible for him to be bad enough to cause a whirlwind, or good
+enough to stop one. After many centuries of thought, he about half
+concluded that making mouths at a priest would not necessarily
+cause an earthquake. He noticed, and no doubt with considerable
+astonishment, that very good men were occasionally struck by
+lightning, while very bad ones escaped. He was frequently forced to
+the painful conclusion (and it is the most painful to which any
+human being ever was forced) that the right did not always prevail.
+He noticed that the gods did not interfere in behalf of the weak
+and innocent. He was now and then astonished by seeing an
+unbeliever in the enjoyment of most excellent health. He finally
+ascertained that there could be no possible connection between an
+unusually severe winter and his failure to give a sheep to a
+priest. He began to suspect that the order of the universe was not
+constantly being changed to assist him because he repeated a creed.
+He observed that some children would steal after having been
+regularly baptized. He noticed a vast difference between religion
+and justice, and that the worshipers of the same god, took delight
+in cutting each other's throats. He saw that these religious
+disputes filled the world with hatred and slavery. At last he had
+the courage to suspect, that no god at any time interferes with the
+order of events. He learned a few facts, and these facts positively
+refused to harmonize with the ignorant superstitions of his
+fathers. Finding his sacred books incorrect and false in some
+particulars, his faith in their authenticity began to be shaken;
+finding his priests ignorant upon some points, he began to lose
+respect for the cloth. This was the commencement of intellectual
+freedom.</p>
+<p>The civilization of man has increased just to the same extent
+that religious power has decreased. The intellectual advancement of
+man depends upon how often he can exchange an old superstition for
+a new truth. The church never enabled a human being to make even
+one of these exchanges; on the contrary, all her power has been
+used to prevent them. In spite, however, of the church, man found
+that some of his religious conceptions were wrong. By reading his
+Bible, he found that the ideas of his God were more cruel and
+brutal than those of the most depraved savage. He also discovered
+that this holy book was filled with ignorance, and that it must
+have been written by persons wholly unacquainted with the nature of
+the phenomena by which we are surrounded; and now and then, some
+man had the goodness and courage to speak his honest thoughts. In
+every age some thinker, some doubter, some investigator, some hater
+of hypocrisy, some despiser of sham, some brave lover of the right,
+has gladly, proudly and heroically braved the ignorant fury of
+superstition for the sake of man and truth. These divine men were
+generally torn in pieces by the worshipers of the gods. Socrates
+was poisoned because he lacked reverence for some of the deities.
+Christ was crucified by a religious rabble for the crime of
+blasphemy. Nothing is more gratifying to a religionist than to
+destroy his enemies at the command of God. Religious persecution
+springs from a due admixture of love towards God and hatred towards
+man.</p>
+<p>The terrible religious wars that inundated the world with blood
+tended at least to bring all religion into disgrace and hatred.
+Thoughtful people began to question the divine origin of a religion
+that made its believers hold the rights of others in absolute
+contempt. A few began to compare Christianity with the religions of
+heathen people, and were forced to admit that the difference was
+hardly worth dying for. They also found that other nations were
+even happier and more prosperous than their own. They began to
+suspect that their religion, after all, was not of much real
+value.</p>
+<p>For three hundred years the Christian world endeavored to rescue
+from the "Infidel" the empty sepulchre of Christ. For three hundred
+years the armies of the cross were baffled and beaten by the
+victorious hosts of an impudent impostor. This immense fact sowed
+the seeds of distrust throughout all Christendom, and millions
+began to lose confidence in a God who had been vanquished by
+Mohammed. The people also found that commerce made friends where
+religion made enemies, and that religious zeal was utterly
+incompatible with peace between nations or individuals. They
+discovered that those who loved the gods most were apt to love men
+least; that the arrogance of universal forgiveness was amazing;
+that the most malicious had the effrontery to pray for their
+enemies, and that humility and tyranny were the fruit of the same
+tree.</p>
+<p>For ages, a deadly conflict has been waged between a few brave
+men and women of thought and genius upon the one side, and the
+great ignorant religious mass on the other. This is the war between
+Science and Faith. The few have appealed to reason, to honor, to
+law, to freedom, to the known, and to happiness here in this world.
+The many have appealed to prejudice, to fear, to miracle, to
+slavery, to the unknown, and to misery hereafter. The few have
+said, "Think!" The many have said, "Believe!"</p>
+<p>The first doubt was the womb and cradle of progress, and from
+the first doubt, man has continued to advance. Men began to
+investigate, and the church began to oppose. The astronomer scanned
+the heavens, while the church branded his grand forehead with the
+word, "Infidel;" and now, not a glittering star in all the vast
+expanse bears a Christian name. In spite of all religion, the
+geologist penetrated the earth, read her history in books of stone,
+and found, hidden within her bosom, souvenirs of all the ages. Old
+ideas perished in the retort of the chemist, and useful truths took
+their places. One by one religious conceptions have been placed in
+the crucible of science, and thus far, nothing but dross has been
+found. A new world has been discovered by the microscope;
+everywhere has been found the infinite; in every direction man has
+investigated and explored and nowhere, in earth or stars, has been
+found the footstep of any being superior to or independent of
+nature. Nowhere has been discovered the slightest evidence of any
+interference from without.</p>
+<p>These are the sublime truths that enabled man to throw off the
+yoke of superstition. These are the splendid facts that snatched
+the sceptre of authority from the hands of priests.</p>
+<p>In that vast cemetery, called the past, are most of the
+religions of men, and there, too, are nearly all their gods. The
+sacred temples of India were ruins long ago. Over column and
+cornice; over the painted and pictured walls, cling and creep the
+trailing vines. Brahma, the golden, with four heads and four arms;
+Vishnu, the sombre, the punisher of the wicked, with his three
+eyes, his crescent, and his necklace of skulls; Siva, the
+destroyer, red with seas of blood; Kali, the goddess; Draupadi, the
+white-armed, and Chrishna, the Christ, all passed away and left the
+thrones of heaven desolate. Along the banks of the sacred Nile,
+Isis no longer wandering weeps, searching for the dead Osiris. The
+shadow of Typhons scowl falls no more upon the waves. The sun rises
+as of yore, and his golden beams still smite the lips of Memnon,
+but Mem-non is as voiceless as the Sphinx. The sacred fanes are
+lost in desert sands; the dusty mummies are still waiting for the
+resurrection promised by their priests, and the old beliefs,
+wrought in curiously sculptured stone, sleep in the mystery of a
+language lost and dead. Odin, the author of life and soul, Vili and
+Ve, and the mighty giant Ymir, strode long ago from the icy halls
+of the North; and Thor, with iron glove and glittering hammer,
+dashes mountains to the earth no more. Broken are the circles and
+cromlechs of the ancient Druids; fallen upon the summits of the
+hills, and covered with the centuries' moss, are the sacred cairns.
+The divine fires of Persia and of the Aztecs, have died out in the
+ashes of the past, and there is none to rekindle, and none to feed
+the holy flames. The harp of Orpheus is still; the drained cup of
+Bacchus has been thrown aside; Venus lies dead in stone, and her
+white bosom heaves no more with love. The streams still murmur, but
+no naiads bathe; the trees still wave, but in the forest aisles no
+dryads dance. The gods have flown from high Olympus. Not even the
+beautiful women can lure them back, and Dan&aelig; lies unnoticed,
+naked to the stars. Hushed forever are the thunders of Sinai; lost
+are the voices of the prophets, and the land once flowing with milk
+and honey, is but a desert waste. One by one, the myths have faded
+from the clouds: one by one, the phantom host has disappeared, and
+one by one, facts, truths and realities have taken their places.
+The supernatural has almost gone, but the natural remains. The gods
+have fled, but man is here.</p>
+<p>Nations, like individuals, have their periods of youth, of
+manhood and decay. Religions are the same. The same inexorable
+destiny awaits them all. The gods created by the nations must
+perish with their creators. They were created by men, and like men,
+they must pass away. The deities of one age are the by-words of the
+next The religion of our day, and country, is no more exempt from
+the sneer of the future than the others have been. When India was
+supreme, Brahma sat upon the world's throne. When the sceptre
+passed to Egypt, Isis and Osiris received the homage of mankind.
+Greece, with her fierce valor, swept to empire, and Zeus put on the
+purple of authority. The earth trembled with the tread of Rome's
+intrepid sons, and Jove grasped with mailed hand the thunderbolts
+of heaven. Rome fell, and Christians from her territory, with the
+red sword of war, carved out the ruling nations of the world, and
+now Christ sits upon the old throne. Who will be his successor?</p>
+<p>Day by day, religious conceptions grow less and less intense.
+Day by day, the old spirit dies out of book and creed. The burning
+enthusiasm, the quenchless zeal of the early church have gone,
+never, never to return. The ceremonies remain, but the ancient
+faith is fading out of the human heart. The worn-out arguments fail
+to convince, and denunciations that once blanched the faces of a
+race, excite in us only derision and disgust. As time rolls on, the
+miracles grow mean and small, and the evidences our fathers thought
+conclusive utterly fail to satisfy us. There is an "irrepressible
+conflict" between religion and science, and they cannot peaceably
+occupy the same brain nor the same world.</p>
+<p>While utterly discarding all creeds, and denying the truth of
+all religions, there is neither in my heart nor upon my lips a
+sneer for the hopeful, loving and tender souls who believe that
+from all this discord will result a perfect harmony; that every
+evil will in some mysterious way become a good, and that above and
+over all there is a being who, in some way, will reclaim and
+glorify every one of the children of men; but for those who
+heartlessly try to prove that salvation is almost impossible; that
+damnation is almost certain; that the highway of the universe leads
+to hell; who fill life with fear and death with horror; who curse
+the cradle and mock the tomb, it is impossible to entertain other
+than feelings of pity, contempt and scorn.</p>
+<p>Reason, Observation and Experience&mdash;the Holy Trinity of
+Science&mdash;have taught us that happiness is the only good; that
+the time to be happy is now, and the way to be happy is to make
+others so. This is enough for us. In this belief we are content to
+live and die. If by any possibility the existence of a power
+superior to, and independent of, nature shall be demonstrated,
+there will then be time enough to kneel. Until then, let us stand
+erect.</p>
+<p>Notwithstanding the fact that infidels in all ages have battled
+for the rights of man, and have at all times been the fearless
+advocates of liberty and justice, we are constantly charged by the
+church with tearing down without building again. The church should
+by this time know that it is utterly impossible to rob men of their
+opinions. The history of religious persecution fully establishes
+the fact that the mind necessarily resists and defies every attempt
+to control it by violence. The mind necessarily clings to old ideas
+until prepared for the new. The moment we comprehend the truth, all
+erroneous ideas are of necessity cast aside.</p>
+<p>A surgeon once called upon a poor cripple and kindly offered to
+render him any assistance in his power. The surgeon began to
+discourse very learnedly upon the nature and origin of disease; of
+the curative properties of certain medicines; of the advantages of
+exercise, air and light, and of the various ways in which health
+and strength could be restored. These remarks were so full of good
+sense, and discovered so much profound thought and accurate
+knowledge, that the cripple, becoming thoroughly alarmed, cried
+out, "Do not, I pray you, take away my crutches. They are my only
+support, and without them I should be miserable indeed!" "I am not
+going," said the surgeon, "to take away your crutches. I am going
+to cure you, and then you will throw the crutches away
+yourself."</p>
+<p>For the vagaries of the clouds the infidels propose to
+substitute the realities of earth; for superstition, the splendid
+demonstrations and achievements of science; and for theological
+tyranny, the chainless liberty of thought.</p>
+<p>We do not say that we have discovered all; that our doctrines
+are the all in all of truth. We know of no end to the development
+of man. We cannot unravel the infinite complications of matter and
+force. The history of one monad is as unknown as that of the
+universe; one drop of water is as wonderful as all the seas; one
+leaf, as all the forests; and one grain of sand, as all the
+stars.</p>
+<p>We are not endeavoring to chain the future, but to free the
+present. We are not forging fetters for our children, but we are
+breaking those our fathers made for us. We are the advocates of
+inquiry, of investigation and thought This of itself, is an
+admission that we are not perfectly satisfied with all our
+conclusions. Philosophy has not the egotism of faith. While
+superstition builds walls and creates obstructions, science opens
+all the highways of thought. We do not pretend to have
+circumnavigated everything, and to have solved all difficulties,
+but we do believe that it is better to love men than to fear gods;
+that it is grander and nobler to think and investigate for yourself
+than to repeat a creed. We are satisfied that there can be but
+little liberty on earth while men worship a tyrant in heaven. We do
+not expect to accomplish everything in our day; but we want to do
+what good we can, and to render all the service possible in the
+holy cause of human progress. We know that doing away with gods and
+supernatural persons and powers is not an end. It is a means to an
+end: the real end being the happiness of man.</p>
+<p>Felling forests is not the end of agriculture. Driving pirates
+from the sea is not all there is of commerce.</p>
+<p>We are laying the foundations of the grand temple of the
+future&mdash;not the temple of all the gods, but of all the
+people&mdash;wherein, with appropriate rites, will be celebrated
+the religion of Humanity. We are doing what little we can to hasten
+the coming of the day when society shall cease producing
+millionaires and mendicants&mdash;gorged indolence and famished
+industry&mdash;truth in rags, and superstition robed and crowned.
+We are looking for the time when the useful shall be the honorable;
+and when Reason, throned upon the world's brain, shall be the King
+of Kings, and God of Gods.</p>
+<a name="link0003"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>HUMBOLDT.</h2>
+<h3>The Universe is Governed by Law.</h3>
+<p>GREAT men seem to be a part of the infinite&mdash;brothers of
+the mountains and the seas.</p>
+<p>Humboldt was one of these. He was one of those serene men, in
+some respects like our own Franklin, whose names have all the
+lustre of a star. He was one of the few, great enough to rise above
+the superstition and prejudice of his time, and to know that
+experience, observation, and reason are the only basis of
+knowledge.</p>
+<p>He became one of the greatest of men in spite of having been
+born rich and noble&mdash;in spite of position. I say in spite of
+these things, because wealth and position are generally the enemies
+of genius, and the destroyers of talent.</p>
+<p>It is often said of this or that man, that he is a self-made
+man&mdash;that he was born of the poorest and humblest parents, and
+that with every obstacle to overcome he became great. This is a
+mistake. Poverty is generally an advantage. Most of the
+intellectual giants of the world have been nursed at the sad and
+loving breast of poverty. Most of those who have climbed highest on
+the shining ladder of fame commenced at the lowest round. They were
+reared in the straw-thatched cottages of Europe; in the log-houses
+of America; in the factories of the great cities; in the midst of
+toil; in the smoke and din of labor, and on the verge of want. They
+were rocked by the feet of mothers whose hands, at the same time,
+were busy with the needle or the wheel.</p>
+<p>It is hard for the rich to resist the thousand allurements of
+pleasure, and so I say, that Humboldt, in spite of having been born
+to wealth and high social position, became truly and grandly
+great.</p>
+<p>In the antiquated and romantic castle of Tegel, by the side of
+the pine forest, on the shore of the charming lake, near the
+beautiful city of Berlin, the great Humboldt, one hundred years ago
+to-day, was born, and there he was educated after the method
+suggested by Rousseau,&mdash;Campe, the philologist and critic, and
+the intellectual Kunth being his tutors. There he received the
+impressions that determined his career; there the great idea that
+the universe is governed by law, took possession of his mind, and
+there he dedicated his life to the demonstration of this sublime
+truth.</p>
+<p>He came to the conclusion that the source of man's unhappiness
+is his ignorance of nature.</p>
+<p>After having received the most thorough education at that time
+possible, and having determined to what end he would devote the
+labors of his life, he turned his attention to the sciences of
+geology, mining, mineralogy, botany, the distribution of plants,
+the distribution of animals, and the effect of climate upon man.
+All grand physical phenomena were investigated and explained. From
+his youth he had felt a great desire for travel. He felt, as he
+says, a violent passion for the sea, and longed to look upon nature
+in her wildest and most rugged forms. He longed to give a physical
+description of the universe&mdash;a grand picture of nature; to
+account for all phenomena; to discover the laws governing the
+world; to do away with that splendid delusion called special
+providence, and to establish the fact that the universe is governed
+by law.</p>
+<p>To establish this truth was, and is, of infinite importance to
+mankind. That fact is the death-knell of superstition; it gives
+liberty to every soul, annihilates fear, and ushers in the Age of
+Reason.</p>
+<p>The object of this illustrious man was to comprehend the
+phenomena of physical objects in their general connection, and to
+represent nature as one great whole, moved and animated by internal
+forces.</p>
+<p>For this purpose he turned his attention to descriptive botany,
+traversing distant lands and mountain ranges to ascertain with
+certainty the geographical distribution of plants. He investigated
+the laws regulating the differences of temperature and climate, and
+the changes of the atmosphere. He studied the formation of the
+earth's crust, explored the deepest mines, ascended the highest
+mountains, and wandered through the craters of extinct
+volcanoes.</p>
+<p>He became thoroughly acquainted with chemistry, with astronomy,
+with terrestrial magnetism; and as the investigation of one subject
+leads to all others, for the reason that there is a mutual
+dependence and a necessary connection between all facts, so
+Humboldt became acquainted with all the known sciences.</p>
+<p>His fame does not depend so much upon his discoveries (although
+he discovered enough to make hundreds of reputations) as upon his
+vast and splendid generalizations.</p>
+<p>He was to science what Shakespeare was to the drama.</p>
+<p>He found, so to speak, the world full of unconnected
+facts&mdash;all portions of a vast system&mdash;parts of a great
+machine; he discovered the connection that each bears to all; put
+them together, and demonstrated beyond all contradiction that the
+earth is governed by law.</p>
+<p>He knew that to discover the connection of phenomena is the
+primary aim of all natural investigation. He was infinitely
+practical.</p>
+<p>Origin and destiny were questions with which he had nothing to
+do.</p>
+<p>His surroundings made him what he was.</p>
+<p>In accordance with a law not fully comprehended, he was a
+production of his time.</p>
+<p>Great men do not live alone; they are surrounded by the great;
+they are the instruments used to accomplish the tendencies of their
+generation; they fulfill the prophecies of their age.</p>
+<p>Nearly all of the scientific men of the eighteenth century had
+the same idea entertained by Humboldt, but most of them in a dim
+and confused way. There was, however, a general belief among the
+intelligent that the world is governed by law, and that there
+really exists a connection between all facts, <i>or that all facts
+are simply the different aspects of a general fact</i>, and that
+the task of science is to discover this connection; to comprehend
+this general fact or to announce the laws of things.</p>
+<p>Germany was full of thought, and her universities swarmed with
+philosophers and grand thinkers in every department of
+knowledge.</p>
+<p>Humboldt was the friend and companion of the greatest poets,
+historians, philologists, artists, statesmen, critics, and
+logicians of his time.</p>
+<p>He was the companion of Schiller, who believed that man would be
+regenerated through the influence of the Beautiful; of Goethe, the
+grand patriarch of German literature; of Weiland, who has been
+called the Voltaire of Germany; of Herder, who wrote the outlines
+of a philosophical history of man; of Kotzebue, who lived in the
+world of romance; of Schleiermacher, the pantheist; of Schlegel,
+who gave to his countrymen the enchanted realm of Shakespeare; of
+the sublime Kant, author of the first work published in Germany on
+Pure Reason; of Fichte, the infinite idealist; of Schopenhauer, the
+European Buddhist who followed the great Gautama to the painless
+and dreamless Nirwana, and of hundreds of others, whose names are
+familiar to and honored by the scientific world.</p>
+<p>The German mind had been grandly roused from the long lethargy
+of the dark ages of ignorance, fear, and faith. Guided by the holy
+light of reason, every department of knowledge was investigated,
+enriched and illustrated.</p>
+<p>Humboldt breathed the atmosphere of investigation; old ideas
+were abandoned; old creeds, hallowed by centuries, were thrown
+aside; thought became courageous; the athlete, Reason, challenged
+to mortal combat the monsters of superstition.</p>
+<p>No wonder that under these influences Humboldt formed the great
+purpose of presenting to the world a picture of Nature, in order
+that men might, for the first time, behold the face of their
+Mother.</p>
+<p>Europe becoming too small for his genius, he visited the tropics
+in the new world, where in the most circumscribed limits he could
+find the greatest number of plants, of animals, and the greatest
+diversity of climate, that he might ascertain the laws governing
+the production and distribution of plants, animals and men, and the
+effects of climate upon them all. He sailed along the gigantic
+Amazon&mdash;the mysterious Orinoco&mdash;traversed the
+Pampas&mdash;climbed the Andes until he stood upon the crags of
+Chimborazo, more than eighteen thousand feet above the level of the
+sea, and climbed on until blood flowed from his eyes and lips. For
+nearly five years he pursued his investigations in the new world,
+accompanied by the intrepid Bonpland. Nothing escaped his
+attention. He was the best intellectual organ of these new
+revelations of science. He was calm, reflective and eloquent;
+filled with a sense of the beautiful, and the love of truth. His
+collections were immense, and valuable beyond calculation to every
+science. He endured innumerable hardships, braved countless dangers
+in unknown and savage lands, and exhausted his fortune for the
+advancement of true learning.</p>
+<p>Upon his return to Europe he was hailed as the second Columbus;
+as the scientific discoverer of America; as the revealer of a new
+world; as the great demonstrator of the sublime truth, that the
+universe is governed by law.</p>
+<p>I have seen a picture of the old man, sitting upon a mountain
+side&mdash;above him the eternal snow&mdash;below, the smiling
+valley of the tropics, filled with vine and palm; his chin upon his
+breast, his eyes deep, thoughtful and calm&mdash;his forehead
+majestic&mdash;grander than the mountain upon which he
+sat&mdash;crowned with the snow of his whitened hair, he looked the
+intellectual autocrat of this world.</p>
+<p>Not satisfied with his discoveries in America, he crossed the
+steppes of Asia, the wastes of Siberia, the great Ural range,
+adding to the knowledge of mankind at every step. His energy
+acknowledged no obstacle, his life knew no leisure; every day was
+filled with labor and with thought.</p>
+<p>He was one of the apostles of science, and he served his divine
+master with a self-sacrificing zeal that knew no abatement; with an
+ardor that constantly increased, and with a devotion unwavering and
+constant as the polar star.</p>
+<p>In order that the people at large might have the benefit of his
+numerous discoveries, and his vast knowledge, he delivered at
+Berlin a course of lectures, consisting of sixty-one free
+addresses, upon the following subjects:</p>
+<p>Five, upon the nature and limits of physical geography.</p>
+<p>Three, were devoted to a history of science.</p>
+<p>Two, to inducements to a study of natural science.</p>
+<p>Sixteen, on the heavens.</p>
+<p>Five, on the form, density, latent heat, and magnetic power of
+the earth, and to the polar light.</p>
+<p>Four, were on the nature of the crust of the earth, on hot
+springs earthquakes, and volcanoes.</p>
+<p>Two, on mountains and the type of their formation.</p>
+<p>Two, on the form of the earth's surface, on the connection of
+continents, and the elevation of soil over ravines.</p>
+<p>Three, on the sea as a globular fluid surrounding the earth.</p>
+<p>Ten, on the atmosphere as an elastic fluid surrounding the
+earth, and on the distribution of heat.</p>
+<p>One, on the geographic distribution of organ ized matter in
+general.</p>
+<p>Three, on the geography of plants.</p>
+<p>Three, on the geography of animals, and</p>
+<p>Two, on the races of men.</p>
+<p>These lectures are what is known as the Cosmos, and present a
+scientific picture of the world&mdash;of infinite diversity in
+unity&mdash;of ceaseless motion in the eternal grasp of law.</p>
+<p>These lectures contain the result of his investigation,
+observation, and experience; they furnish the connection between
+phenomena; they disclose some of the changes through which the
+earth has passed in the countless ages; the history of vegetation,
+animals and men, the effects of climate upon individuals and
+nations, the relation we sustain to other worlds, and demonstrate
+that all phenomena, whether insignificant or grand, exist in
+accordance with inexorable law.</p>
+<p>There are some truths, however, that we never should forget:
+Superstition has always been the relentless enemy of science; faith
+has been a hater of demonstration; hypocrisy has been sincere only
+in its dread of truth, and all religions are inconsistent with
+mental freedom.</p>
+<p>Since the murder of Hypatia in the fifth century, when the
+polished blade of Greek philosophy was broken by the club of
+ignorant Catholicism, until to-day, superstition has detested every
+effort of reason.</p>
+<p>It is almost impossible to conceive of the completeness of the
+victory that the church achieved over philosophy. For ages science
+was utterly ignored; thought was a poor slave; an ignorant priest
+was master of the world; faith put out the eyes of the soul; the
+reason was a trembling coward; the imagination was set on fire of
+hell; every human feeling was sought to be suppressed; love was
+considered infinitely sinful; pleasure was the road to eternal
+fire, and God was supposed to be happy only when his children were
+miserable. The world was governed by an Almighty's whim; prayers
+could change the order of things, halt the grand procession of
+nature, could produce rain, avert pestilence, famine and death in
+all its forms. There was no idea of the certain; all depended upon
+divine pleasure or displeasure rather; heaven was full of
+inconsistent malevolence, and earth of ignorance. Everything was
+done to appease the divine wrath; every public calamity was caused
+by the sins of the people; by a failure to pay tithes, or for
+having, even in secret, felt a disrespect for a priest. To the poor
+multitude, the earth was a kind of enchanted forest, full of demons
+ready to devour, and theological serpents lurking with infinite
+power to fascinate and torture the unhappy and impotent soul. Life
+to them was a dim and mysterious labyrinth, in which they wandered
+weary, and lost, guided by priests as bewildered as themselves,
+without knowing that at every step the Ariadne of reason offered
+them the long lost clue.</p>
+<p>The very heavens were full of death; the lightning was regarded
+as the glittering vengeance of God, and the earth was thick with
+snares for the unwary feet of man. The soul was supposed to be
+crowded with the wild beasts of desire; the heart to be totally
+corrupt, prompting only to crime; virtues were regarded as deadly
+sins in disguise; there was a continual warfare being waged between
+the Deity and the Devil, for the possession of every soul; the
+latter generally being considered victorious. The flood, the
+tornado, the volcano, were all evidences of the displeasure of
+heaven, and the sinfulness of man. The blight that withered, the
+frost that blackened, the earthquake that devoured, were the
+messengers of the Creator.</p>
+<p>The world was governed by Fear.</p>
+<p>Against all the evils of nature, there was known only the
+defence of prayer, of fasting, of credulity, and devotion. <i>Man
+in his helplessness endeavored to soften the heart of God</i>. The
+faces of the multitude were blanched with fear, and wet with tears;
+they were the prey of hypocrites, kings and priests.</p>
+<p>My heart bleeds when I contemplate the sufferings endured by the
+millions now dead; of those who lived when the world appeared to be
+insane; when the heavens were filled with an infinite Horror who
+snatched babes with dimpled hands and rosy cheeks from the white
+breasts of mothers, and dashed them into an abyss of eternal
+flame.</p>
+<p>Slowly, beautifully, like the coming of the dawn, came the grand
+truth, that the universe is governed by law; that disease fastens
+itself upon the good and upon the bad; that the tornado cannot be
+stopped by counting beads; that the rushing lava pauses not for
+bended knees, the lightning for clasped and uplifted hands, nor the
+cruel waves of the sea for prayer; that paying tithes causes,
+rather than prevents famine; that pleasure is not sin; that
+happiness is the only good; that demons and gods exist only in the
+imagination; that faith is a lullaby sung to put the soul to sleep;
+that devotion is a bribe that fear offers to supposed power; that
+offering rewards in another world for obedience in this, is simply
+buying a soul on credit; that knowledge consists in ascertaining
+the laws of nature, and that wisdom is the science of happiness.
+Slowly, grandly, beautifully, these truths are dawning upon
+mankind.</p>
+<p>From Copernicus we learned that this earth is only a grain of
+sand on the infinite shore of the universe; that everywhere we are
+surrounded by shining worlds vastly greater than our own, all
+moving and existing in accordance with law. True, the earth began
+to grow small, but man began to grow great.</p>
+<p>The moment the fact was, established that other worlds are
+governed by law, it was only natural to conclude that our little
+world was also under its dominion. The old theological method of
+accounting for physical phenomena by the pleasure and displeasure
+of the Deity was, by the intellectual, abandoned. They found that
+disease, death, life, thought, heat, cold, the seasons, the winds,
+the dreams of man, the instinct of animals,&mdash;in short, that
+all physical and mental phenomena are governed by law, absolute,
+eternal and inexorable.</p>
+<p>Let it be understood that by the term Law is meant the same
+invariable relations of succession and resemblance predicated of
+all facts springing from like conditions. Law is a fact&mdash;not a
+cause. It is a fact, that like conditions produce like results:
+this fact is Law. When we say that the universe is governed by law,
+we mean that this fact, called law, is incapable of change; that it
+is, has been, and forever will be, the same inexorable, immutable
+Fact, inseparable from all phenomena. Law, in this sense, was not
+enacted or made. It could not have been otherwise than as it is.
+That which necessarily exists has no creator.</p>
+<p>Only a few years ago this earth was considered the real center
+of the universe; all the stars were supposed to revolve around this
+insignificant atom. The German mind, more than any other, has done
+away with this piece of egotism. Purbach and Mullerus, in the
+fifteenth century, contributed most to the advancement of astronomy
+in their day. To the latter, the world is indebted for the
+introduction of decimal fractions, which completed our arithmetical
+notation, and formed the second of the three steps by which, in
+modern times, the science of numbers has been so greatly improved;
+and yet, both of these men believed in the most childish
+absurdities, at least in enough of them, to die without their
+orthodoxy having ever been suspected.</p>
+<p>Next came the great Copernicus, and he stands at the head of the
+heroic thinkers of his time, who had the courage and the mental
+strength to break the chains of prejudice, custom, and authority,
+and to establish truth on the basis of experience, observation and
+reason. He removed the earth, so to speak, from the centre of the
+universe, and ascribed to it a two-fold motion, and demonstrated
+the true position which it occupies in the solar system.</p>
+<p>At his bidding the earth began to revolve. At the command of his
+genius it commenced its grand flight mid the eternal constellations
+round the sun.</p>
+<p>For fifty years his discoveries were disregarded. All at once,
+by the exertions of Galileo, they were kindled into so grand a
+conflagration as to consume the philosophy of Aristotle, to alarm
+the hierarchy of Rome, and to threaten the existence of every
+opinion not founded upon experience, observation, and reason.</p>
+<p>The earth was no longer considered a universe, governed by the
+caprices of some revengeful Deity, who had made the stars out of
+what he had left after completing the world, and had stuck them in
+the sky simply to adorn the night.</p>
+<p>I have said this much concerning astronomy because it was the
+first splendid step forward! The first sublime blow that shattered
+the lance and shivered the shield of superstition; the first real
+help that man received from heaven; because it was the first great
+lever placed beneath the altar of a false religion; the first
+revelation of the infinite to man; the first authoritative
+declaration, that the universe is governed by law; the first
+science that gave the lie direct to the cosmogony of barbarism, and
+because it is the sublimest victory that the reason has
+achieved.</p>
+<p>In speaking of astronomy, I have confined myself to the
+discoveries made since the revival of learning. Long ago, on the
+banks of the Ganges, ages before Copernicus lived, Aryabhatta
+taught that the earth is a sphere, and revolves on its own axis.
+This, however, does not detract from the glory of the great German.
+The discovery of the Hindu had been lost in the midnight of
+Europe&mdash;in the age of faith, and Copernicus was as much a
+discoverer as though Aryabhatta had never lived.</p>
+<p>In this short address there is no time to speak of other
+sciences, and to point out the particular evidence furnished by
+each, to establish the dominion of law, nor to more than mention
+the name of Descartes, the first who undertook to give an
+explanation of the celestial motions, or who formed the vast and
+philosophic conception of reducing all the phenomena of the
+universe to the same law; of Montaigne, one of the heroes of common
+sense; of Galvani, whose experiments gave the telegraph to the
+world; of Voltaire, who contributed more than any other of the sons
+of men to the destruction of religious intolerance; of August
+Comte, whose genius erected to itself a monument that still touches
+the stars; of Guttenberg, Watt, Stephenson, Arkwright, all soldiers
+of science, in the grand army of the dead kings.</p>
+<p>The glory of science is, that it is freeing the
+soul&mdash;breaking the mental manacles&mdash;getting the brain out
+of bondage&mdash;giving courage to thought&mdash;filling the world
+with mercy, justice, and joy.</p>
+<p>Science found agriculture plowing with a stick reaping with a
+sickle&mdash;commerce at the mercy of the treacherous waves and the
+inconstant winds&mdash;a world without books&mdash;without schools
+man denying the authority of reason, employing his ingenuity in the
+manufacture of instruments of torture, in building inquisitions and
+cathedrals. It found the land filled with malicious
+monks&mdash;with persecuting Protestants, and the burners of men.
+It found a world full of fear; ignorance upon its knees; credulity
+the greatest virtue; women treated like beasts of burden; cruelty
+the only means of reformation.</p>
+<p>It found the world at the mercy of disease and famine; men
+trying to read their fates in the stars, and to tell their fortunes
+by signs and wonders; generals thinking to conquer their enemies by
+making the sign of the cross, or by telling a rosary. It found all
+history full of petty and ridiculous falsehood, and the Almighty
+was supposed to spend most of his time turning sticks into snakes,
+drowning boys for swimming on Sunday, and killing little children
+for the purpose of converting their parents. It found the earth
+filled with slaves and tyrants, the people in all countries
+downtrodden, half naked, half starved, without hope, and without
+reason in the world.</p>
+<p>Such was the condition of man when the morning of science dawned
+upon his brain, and before he had heard the sublime declaration
+that the universe is governed by law.</p>
+<p>For the change that has taken place we are indebted solely to
+science&mdash;the only lever capable of raising mankind. Abject
+faith is barbarism; reason is civilization. To obey is slavish; to
+act from a sense of obligation perceived by the reason, is noble.
+Ignorance worships mystery; Reason explains it: the one grovels,
+the other soars.</p>
+<p>No wonder that fable is the enemy of knowledge. A man with a
+false diamond shuns the society of lapidaries, and it is upon this
+principle that superstition abhors science.</p>
+<p>In all ages the people have honored those who dishonored them.
+They have worshiped their destroyers; they have canonized the most
+gigantic liars, and buried the great thieves in marble and gold.
+Under the loftiest monuments sleeps the dust of murder.</p>
+<p>Imposture has always worn a crown.</p>
+<p>The world is beginning to change because the people are
+beginning to think. To think is to advance. Everywhere the great
+minds are investigating the creeds and the superstitions of
+men&mdash;the phenomena of nature, and the laws of things. At the
+head of this great army of investigators stood Humboldt&mdash;the
+serene leader of an intellectual host&mdash;a king by the suffrage
+of Science, and the divine right of Genius.</p>
+<p>And to-day we are not honoring some butcher called a
+soldier&mdash;some wily politician called a statesman&mdash;some
+robber called a king, nor some malicious metaphysician called a
+saint We are honoring the grand Humboldt, whose victories were all
+achieved in the arena of thought; who destroyed prejudice,
+ignorance and error&mdash;not men; who shed light&mdash;not blood,
+and who contributed to the knowledge, the wealth, and the happiness
+of all mankind.</p>
+<p>His life was pure, his aims lofty, his learning varied and
+profound, and his achievements vast.</p>
+<p>We honor him because he has ennobled our race, because he has
+contributed as much as any man living or dead to the real
+prosperity of the world. We honor him because he honored
+us&mdash;because he labored for others&mdash;because he was the
+most learned man of the most learned nation&mdash;because he left a
+legacy of glory to every human being. For these reasons he is
+honored throughout the world. Millions are doing homage to his
+genius at this moment, and millions are pronouncing his name with
+reverence and recounting what he accomplished.</p>
+<p>We associate the name of Humboldt with oceans, continents,
+mountains, and volcanoes&mdash;with the great palms&mdash;the wide
+deserts&mdash;the snow-lipped craters of the Andes&mdash;with
+primeval forests and European capitals&mdash;with wildernesses and
+universities&mdash;with savages and savans&mdash;with the lonely
+rivers of unpeopled wastes&mdash;with peaks and pampas, and
+steppes, and cliffs and crags&mdash;with the progress of the
+world&mdash;with every science known to man, and with every star
+glittering in the immensity of space.</p>
+<p>Humboldt adopted none of the soul-shrinking creeds of his day;
+wasted none of his time in the stupidities, inanities and
+contradictions of theological metaphysics; he did not endeavor to
+harmonize the astronomy and geology of a barbarous people with the
+science of the nineteenth century. Never, for one moment, did he
+abandon the sublime standard of truth; he investigated, he studied,
+he thought, he separated the gold from the dross in the crucible of
+his grand brain. He was never found on his knees before the altar
+of superstition. He stood erect by the grand tranquil column of
+Reason. He was an admirer, a lover, an adorer of Nature, and at the
+age of ninety, bowed by the weight of nearly a century, covered
+with the insignia of honor, loved by a nation, respected by a
+world, with kings for his servants, he laid his weary head upon her
+bosom&mdash;upon the bosom of the universal Mother&mdash;and with
+her loving arms around him, sank into that slumber called
+Death.</p>
+<p>History added another name to the starry scroll of the
+immortals.</p>
+<p>The world is his monument; upon the eternal granite of her hills
+he inscribed his name, and there upon everlasting stone his genius
+wrote this, the sublimest of truths:</p>
+<p>"The Universe is Governed by Law!"</p>
+<a name="link0004"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>THOMAS PAINE</h2>
+<h3>With His Name Left Out, the History of Liberty Cannot be
+Written.</h3>
+<p>TO speak the praises of the brave and thoughtful dead, is to me
+a labor of gratitude and love.</p>
+<p>Through all the centuries gone, the mind of man has been
+beleaguered by the mailed hosts of superstition. Slowly and
+painfully has advanced the army of deliverance. Hated by those they
+wished to rescue, despised by those they were dying to save, these
+grand soldiers, these immortal deliverers, have fought without
+thanks, labored without applause, suffered without pity, and they
+have died execrated and abhorred. For the good of mankind they
+accepted isolation, poverty, and calumny. They gave up all,
+sacrificed all, lost all but truth and self-respect.</p>
+<p>One of the bravest soldiers in this army was Thomas Paine; and
+for one, I feel indebted to him for the liberty we are enjoying
+this day. Born among the poor, where children are burdens; in a
+country where real liberty was unknown; where the privileges of
+class were guarded with infinite jealousy, and the rights of the
+individual trampled beneath the feet of priests and nobles; where
+to advocate justice was treason; where intellectual freedom was
+Infidelity, it is wonderful that the idea of true liberty ever
+entered his brain. .</p>
+<p>Poverty was his mother&mdash;Necessity his master.</p>
+<p>He had more brains than books; more sense than education; more
+courage than politeness; more strength than polish. He had no
+veneration for old mistakes&mdash;no admiration for ancient lies.
+He loved the truth for the truth's sake, and for man's sake. He saw
+oppression on every hand; injustice everywhere; hypocrisy at the
+altar, venality on the bench, tyranny on the throne; and with a
+splendid courage he espoused the cause of the weak against the
+strong&mdash;of the enslaved many against the titled few.</p>
+<p>In England he was nothing. He belonged to the lower classes.
+There was no avenue open for him. The people hugged their chains,
+and the whole power of the government was ready to crush any man
+who endeavored to strike a blow for the right.</p>
+<p>At the age of thirty-seven, Thomas Paine left England for
+America, with the high hope of being instrumental in the
+establishment of a free government. In his own country he could
+accomplish nothing. Those two vultures&mdash;Church and
+State&mdash;were ready to tear in pieces and devour the heart of
+any one who might deny their divine right to enslave the world.</p>
+<p>Upon his arrival in this country, he found himself possessed of
+a letter of introduction, signed by another Infidel, the
+illustrious Franklin. This, and his native genius, constituted his
+entire capital; and he needed no more. He found the colonies
+clamoring for justice; whining about their grievances; upon their
+knees at the foot of the throne, imploring that mixture of idiocy
+and insanity, George the III., by the grace of God, for a
+restoration of their ancient privileges. They were not endeavoring
+to become free men, but were trying to soften the heart of their
+master. They were perfectly willing to make brick if Pharaoh would
+furnish the straw. The colonists wished for, hoped for, and prayed
+for reconciliation They did not dream of independence.</p>
+<p>Paine gave to the world his "Common Sense." It was the first
+argument for separation, the first assault upon the British form of
+government, the first blow for a republic, and it aroused our
+fathers like a trumpet's blast.</p>
+<p>He was the first to perceive the destiny of the New World.</p>
+<p>No other pamphlet ever accomplished such wonderful results. It
+was filled with argument, reason, persuasion, and unanswerable
+logic. It opened a new world. It filled the present with hope and
+the future with honor. Everywhere the people responded, and in a
+few months the Continental Congress declared the colonies free and
+independent States.</p>
+<p>A new nation was born.</p>
+<p>It is simple justice to say that Paine did more to cause the
+Declaration of Independence than any other man. Neither should it
+be forgotten that his attacks upon Great Britain were also attacks
+upon monarchy; and while he convinced the people that the colonies
+ought to separate from the mother country, he also proved to them
+that a free government is the best that can be instituted among
+men.</p>
+<p>In my judgment, Thomas Paine was the best political writer that
+ever lived. "What he wrote was pure nature, and his soul and his
+pen ever went together." Ceremony, pageantry, and all the
+paraphernalia of power, had no effect upon him. He examined into
+the why and wherefore of things. He was perfectly radical in his
+mode of thought. Nothing short of the bed-rock satisfied him. His
+enthusiasm for what he believed to be right knew no bounds. During
+all the dark scenes of the Revolution, never for one moment did he
+despair. Year after year his brave words were ringing through the
+land, and by the bivouac fires the weary soldiers read the
+inspiring words of "Common Sense," filled with ideas sharper than
+their swords, and consecrated themselves anew to the cause of
+Freedom.</p>
+<p>Paine was not content with having aroused the spirit of
+independence, but he gave every energy of his soul to keep that
+spirit alive. He was with the army. He shared its defeats, its
+dangers, and its glory. When the situation became desperate, when
+gloom settled upon all, he gave them the "Crisis." It was a cloud
+by day and a pillar of fire by night, leading the way to freedom,
+honor, and glory. He shouted to them, "These are the times that try
+men's souls. The summer soldier, and the sunshine patriot, will, in
+this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that
+stands it now deserves the love and thanks of man and woman."</p>
+<p>To those who wished to put the war off to some future day, with
+a lofty and touching spirit of self-sacrifice he said: "Every
+generous parent should say, 'If there must be war let it be in my
+day, that my child may have peace.'" To the cry that Americans were
+rebels, he replied: "He that rebels against reason is a real rebel;
+but he that in defence of reason rebels against tyranny, has a
+better title to 'Defender of the Faith' than George the Third."</p>
+<p>Some said it was not to the interest of the colonies to be free.
+Paine answered this by saying, "To know whether it be the interest
+of the continent to be independent, we need ask only this simple,
+easy question: 'Is it the interest of a man to be a boy all his
+life?'" He found many who would listen to nothing, and to them he
+said, "That to argue with a man who has renounced his reason is
+like giving medicine to the dead." This sentiment ought to adorn
+the walls of every orthodox church.</p>
+<p>There is a world of political wisdom in this: "England lost her
+liberty in a long chain of right reasoning from wrong principles";
+and there is real discrimination in saying, "The Greeks and Romans
+were strongly possessed of the spirit of liberty, but not the
+principles, for at the time that they were determined not to be
+slaves themselves, they employed their power to enslave the rest of
+mankind."</p>
+<p>In his letter to the British people, in which he tried to
+convince them that war was not to their interest, occurs the
+following passage brimful of common sense: "War never can be the
+interest of a trading nation any more than quarreling can be
+profitable to a man in business. But to make war with those who
+trade with us is like setting a bull-dog upon a customer at the
+shop-door."</p>
+<p>The writings of Paine fairly glitter with simple, compact,
+logical statements, that carry conviction to the dullest and most
+prejudiced. He had the happiest possible way of putting the case;
+in asking questions in such a way that they answer themselves, and
+in stating his premises so clearly that the deduction could not be
+avoided.</p>
+<p>Day and night he labored for America; month after month, year
+after year, he gave himself to the Great Cause, until there was "a
+government of the people and for the people," and until the banner
+of the stars floated over a continent redeemed, and consecrated to
+the happiness of mankind.</p>
+<p>At the close of the Revolution, no one stood higher in America
+than Thomas Paine. The best, the wisest, the most patriotic, were
+his friends and admirers; and had he been thinking only of his own
+good he might have rested from his toils and spent the remainder of
+his life in comfort and in ease. He could have been what the world
+is pleased to call "respectable." He could have died surrounded by
+clergymen, warriors and statesmen. At his death there would have
+been an imposing funeral, miles of carriages, civic societies,
+salvos of artillery, a nation in mourning, and, above all, a
+splendid monument covered with lies.</p>
+<p>He chose rather to benefit mankind.</p>
+<p>At that time the seeds sown by the great Infidels were beginning
+to bear fruit in France. The people were beginning to think.</p>
+<p>The Eighteenth Century was crowning its gray hairs with the
+wreath of Progress.</p>
+<p>On every hand Science was bearing testimony against the Church.
+Voltaire had filled Europe with light; D'Holbach was giving to the
+<i>&eacute;lite</i> of Paris the principles contained in his
+"System of Nature." The Encyclopedists had attacked superstition
+with information for the masses. The foundation of things began to
+be examined. A few had the courage to keep their shoes on and let
+the bush burn. Miracles began to get scarce. Everywhere the people
+began to inquire. America had set an example to the world. The word
+Liberty was in the mouths of men, and they began to wipe the dust
+from their knees.</p>
+<p>The dawn of a new day had appeared.</p>
+<p>Thomas Paine went to France. Into the new movement he threw all
+his energies. His fame had gone before him, and he was welcomed as
+a friend of the human race, and as a champion of free
+government.</p>
+<p>He had never relinquished his intention of pointing out to his
+countrymen the defects, absurdities and abuses of the English
+government For this purpose he composed and published his greatest
+political work, "The Rights of Man." This work should be read by
+every man and woman. It is concise, accurate, natural, convincing,
+and unanswerable. It shows great thought; an intimate knowledge of
+the various forms of government; deep insight into the very springs
+of human action, and a courage that compels respect and admiration.
+The most difficult political problems are solved in a few
+sentences. The venerable arguments in favor of wrong are refuted
+with a question&mdash;answered with a word. For forcible
+illustration, apt comparison, accuracy and clearness of statement,
+and absolute thoroughness, it has never been excelled.</p>
+<p>The fears of the administration were aroused, and Paine was
+prosecuted for libel and found guilty; and yet there is not a
+sentiment in the entire work that will not challenge the admiration
+of every civilized man. It is a magazine of political wisdom, an
+arsenal of ideas, and an honor, not only to Thomas Paine, but to
+human nature itself. It could have been written only by the man who
+had the generosity, the exalted patriotism, the goodness to say,
+"The world is my country, and to do good my religion."</p>
+<p>There is in all the utterances of the world no grander, no
+sublimer sentiment. There is no creed that can be compared with it
+for a moment. It should be wrought in gold, adorned with jewels,
+and impressed upon every human heart: "The world is my country, and
+to do good my religion."</p>
+<p>In 1792, Paine was elected by the department of Calais as their
+representative in the National Assembly. So great was his
+popularity in France that he was selected about the same time by
+the people of no less than four departments.</p>
+<p>Upon taking his place in the Assembly he was appointed as one of
+a committee to draft a constitution for France. Had the French
+people taken the advice of Thomas Paine there would have been no
+"reign of terror." The streets of Paris would not have been filled
+with blood The Revolution would have been the grandest success of
+the world. The truth is that Paine was too conservative to suit the
+leaders of the French Revolution. They, to a great extent, were
+carried away by hatred, and a desire to destroy. They had suffered
+so long, they had borne so much, that it was impossible for them to
+be moderate in the hour of victory.</p>
+<p>Besides all this, the French people had been so robbed by the
+government, so degraded by the church, that they were not fit
+material with which to construct a republic. Many of the leaders
+longed to establish a beneficent and just government, but the
+people asked for revenge.</p>
+<p>Paine was filled with a real love for mankind. His philanthropy
+was boundless. He wished to destroy monarchy&mdash;not the monarch.
+He voted for the destruction of tyranny, and against the death of
+the king. He wished to establish a government on a new basis; one
+that would forget the past; one that would give privileges to none,
+and protection to all.</p>
+<p>In the Assembly, where nearly all were demanding the execution
+of the king&mdash;where to differ from the majority was to be
+suspected, and, where to be suspected was almost certain death
+Thomas Paine had the courage, the goodness and the justice to vote
+against death. To vote against the execution of the king was a vote
+against his own life. This was the sublimity of devotion to
+principle. For this he was arrested, imprisoned, and doomed to
+death.</p>
+<p>Search the records of the world and you will find but few
+sublimer acts than that of Thomas Paine voting against the kings
+death. He, the hater of despotism, the abhorrer of monarchy, the
+champion of the rights of man, the republican, accepting death to
+save the life of a deposed tyrant&mdash;of a throneless king. This
+was the last grand act of his political life&mdash;the sublime
+conclusion of his political career.</p>
+<p>All his life he had been the disinterested friend of man. He had
+labored&mdash;not for money, not for fame, but for the general
+good. He had aspired to no office; had asked no recognition of his
+services, but had ever been content to labor as a common soldier in
+the army of Progress. Confining his efforts to no country, looking
+upon the world as his field of action, filled with a genuine love
+for the right, he found himself imprisoned by the very people he
+had striven to save.</p>
+<p>Had his enemies succeeded in bringing him to the block, he would
+have escaped the calumnies and the hatred of the Christian world.
+In this country, at least, he would have ranked with the proudest
+names. On the anniversary of the Declaration his name would have
+been upon the lips of all the orators, and his memory in the hearts
+of all the people.</p>
+<p>Thomas Paine had not finished his career.</p>
+<p>He had spent his life thus far in destroying the power of kings,
+and now he turned his attention to the priests. He knew that every
+abuse had been embalmed in Scripture&mdash;that every outrage was
+in partnership with some holy text. He knew that the throne skulked
+behind the altar, and both behind a pretended revelation from God.
+By this time he had found that it was of little use to free the
+body and leave the mind in chains. He had explored the foundations
+of despotism, and had found them infinitely rotten. He had dug
+under the throne, and it occurred to him that he would take a look
+behind the altar.</p>
+<p>The result of his investigations was given to the world in the
+"Age of Reason." From the moment of its publication he became
+infamous. He was calumniated beyond measure. To slander him was to
+secure the thanks of the church. All his services were instantly
+forgotten, disparaged or denied. He was shunned as though he had
+been a pestilence. Most of his old friends forsook him. He was
+regarded as a moral plague, and at the bare mention of his name the
+bloody hands of the church were raised in horror. He was denounced
+as the most despicable of men.</p>
+<p>Not content with following him to his grave, they pursued him
+after death with redoubled fury, and recounted with infinite gusto
+and satisfaction the supposed horrors of his death-bed; gloried in
+the fact that he was forlorn and friendless, and gloated like
+fiends over what they supposed to be the agonizing remorse of his
+lonely death.</p>
+<p>It is wonderful that all his services were thus forgotten. It is
+amazing that one kind word did not fall from some pulpit; that some
+one did not accord to him, at least&mdash;honesty. Strange, that in
+the general denunciation some one did not remember his labor for
+liberty, his devotion to principle, his zeal for the rights of his
+fellow-men. He had, by brave and splendid effort, associated his
+name with the cause of Progress. He had made it impossible to write
+the history of political freedom with his name left out He was one
+of the creators of light; one of the heralds of the dawn. He hated
+tyranny in the name of kings, and in the name of God, with every
+drop of his noble blood. He believed in liberty and justice, and in
+the sacred doctrine of human equality. Under these divine banners
+he fought the battle of his life. In both worlds he offered his
+blood for the good of man. In the wilderness of America, in the
+French Assembly, in the sombre cell waiting for death, he was the
+same unflinching, unwavering friend of his race; the same undaunted
+champion of universal freedom. And for this he has been hated; for
+this the church has violated even his grave.</p>
+<p>This is enough to make one believe that nothing is more natural
+than for men to devour their benefactors. The people in all ages
+have crucified and glorified. Whoever lifts his voice against
+abuses, whoever arraigns the past at the bar of the present,
+whoever asks the king to show his commission, or questions the
+authority of the priest, will be denounced as the enemy of man and
+God. In all ages reason has been regarded as the enemy of religion.
+Nothing has been considered so pleasing to the Deity as a total
+denial of the authority of your own mind. Self-reliance has been
+thought a deadly sin; and the idea of living and dying without the
+aid and consolation of superstition has always horrified the
+church. By some unaccountable infatuation, belief has been and
+still is considered of immense importance. All religions have been
+based upon the idea that God will forever reward the true believer,
+and eternally damn the man who doubts or denies. Belief is regarded
+as the one essential thing. To practice justice, to love mercy, is
+not enough. You must believe in some incomprehensible creed. You
+must say, "Once one is three, and three times one is one." The man
+who practiced every virtue, but failed to believe, was execrated.
+Nothing so outrages the feelings of the church as a moral
+unbeliever&mdash;nothing so horrible as a charitable Atheist.</p>
+<p>When Paine was born, the world was religious, the pulpit was the
+real throne, and the churches were making every effort to crush out
+of the brain the idea that it had the right to think.</p>
+<p>The splendid saying of Lord Bacon, that "the inquiry of truth,
+which is the love-making or wooing of it, the knowledge of truth,
+which is the presence of it, and the belief of truth, which is the
+enjoying of it, are the sovereign good of human nature," has been,
+and ever will be, rejected by religionists. Intellectual liberty,
+as a matter of necessity, forever destroys the idea that belief is
+either praise or blame-worthy, and is wholly inconsistent with
+every creed in Christendom. Paine recognized this truth. He also
+saw that as long as the Bible was considered inspired, this
+infamous doctrine of the virtue of belief would be believed and
+preached. He examined the Scriptures for himself, and found them
+filled with cruelty, absurdity and immorality.</p>
+<p>He again made up his mind to sacrifice himself for the good of
+his fellow-men.</p>
+<p>He commenced with the assertion, "That any system of religion
+that has anything in it that shocks the mind of a child cannot be a
+true system." What a beautiful, what a tender sentiment! No wonder
+the church began to hate him. He believed in one God, and no more.
+After this life he hoped for happiness. He believed that true
+religion consisted in doing justice, loving mercy, in endeavoring
+to make our fellow-creatures happy, and in offering to God the
+fruit of the heart. He denied the inspiration of the Scriptures.
+This was his crime.</p>
+<p>He contended that it is a contradiction in terms to call
+anything a revelation that comes to us second-hand, either verbally
+or in writing. He asserted that revelation is necessarily limited
+to the first communication, and that after that it is only an
+account of something which another person says was a revelation to
+him. We have only his word for it, as it was never made to us. This
+argument never has been and probably never will be answered. He
+denied the divine origin of Christ, and showed conclusively that
+the pretended prophecies of the Old Testament had no reference to
+him whatever; and yet he believed that Christ was a virtuous and
+amiable man; that the morality he taught and practiced was of the
+most benevolent and elevated character, and that it had not been
+exceeded by any. Upon this point he entertained the same sentiments
+now held by the Unitarians, and in fact by all the most enlightened
+Christians.</p>
+<p>In his time the church believed and taught that every word in
+the Bible was absolutely true. Since his day it has been proven
+false in its cosmogony, false in its astronomy, false in its
+chronology, false in its history, and so far as the Old Testament
+is concerned, false in almost everything. There are but few, if
+any, scientific men who apprehend that the Bible is literally true.
+Who on earth at this day would pretend to settle any scientific
+question by a text from the Bible? The old belief is confined to
+the ignorant and zealous. The church itself will before long be
+driven to occupy the position of Thomas Paine. The best minds of
+the orthodox world, to-day, are endeavoring to prove the existence
+of a personal Deity. All other questions occupy a minor place. You
+are no longer asked to swallow the Bible whole, whale, Jonah and
+all; you are simply required to believe in God, and pay your
+pew-rent. There is not now an enlightened minister in the world who
+will seriously contend that Samson's strength was in his hair, or
+that the necromancers of Egypt could turn water into blood, and
+pieces of wood into serpents. These follies have passed away, and
+the only reason that the religious world can now have for disliking
+Paine is that they have been forced to adopt so many of his
+opinions.</p>
+<p>Paine thought the barbarities of the Old Testament inconsistent
+with what he deemed the real character of God. He believed that
+murder, massacre and indiscriminate slaughter had never been
+commanded by the Deity. He regarded much of the Bible as childish,
+unimportant and foolish The scientific world entertains the same
+opinion. Paine attacked the Bible precisely in the same spirit in
+which he had attacked the pretensions of kings. He used the same
+weapons. All the pomp in the world could not make him cower. His
+reason knew no "Holy of Holies," except the abode of Truth. The
+sciences were then in their infancy. The attention of the really
+learned had not been directed to an impartial examination of our
+pretended revelation. It was accepted by most as a matter of
+course. The church was all-powerful, and no one, unless thoroughly
+imbued with the spirit of self-sacrifice, thought for a moment of
+disputing the fundamental doctrines of Christianity. The infamous
+doctrines that salvation depends upon belief&mdash;upon a mere
+intellectual conviction&mdash;was then believed and preached. To
+doubt was to secure the damnation of your soul. This absurd and
+devilish doctrine shocked the common sense of Thomas Paine, and he
+denounced it with the fervor of honest indignation. This doctrine,
+although infinitely ridiculous, has been nearly universal, and has
+been as hurtful as senseless. For the overthrow of this infamous
+tenet, Paine exerted all his strength. He left few arguments to be
+used by those who should come after him, and he used none that have
+been refuted. The combined wisdom and genius of all mankind cannot
+possibly conceive of an argument against liberty of thought.
+Neither can they show why any one should be punished, either in
+this world or another, for acting honestly in accordance with
+reason; and yet a doctrine with every possible argument against it
+has been, and still is, believed and defended by the entire
+orthodox world. Can it be possible that we have been endowed with
+reason simply that our souls may be caught in its toils and snares,
+that we may be led by its false and delusive glare out of the
+narrow path that leads to joy into the broad way of everlasting
+death? Is it possible that we have been given reason simply that we
+may through faith ignore its deductions, and avoid its conclusions?
+Ought the sailor to throw away his compass and depend entirely upon
+the fog? If reason is not to be depended upon in matters of
+religion, that is to say, in respect of our duties to the Deity,
+why should it be relied upon in matters respecting the rights of
+our fellows? Why should we throw away the laws given to Moses by
+God himself and have the audacity to make some of our own? How dare
+we drown the thunders of Sinai by calling the ayes and noes in a
+petty legislature? If reason can determine what is merciful, what
+is just, the duties of man to man, what more do we want either in
+time or eternity?</p>
+<p>Down, forever down, with any religion that requires upon its
+ignorant altar the sacrifice of the goddess Reason, that compels
+her to abdicate forever the shining throne of the soul, strips from
+her form the imperial purple, snatches from her hand the sceptre of
+thought and makes her the bond-woman of a senseless faith!</p>
+<p>If a man should tell you that he had the most beautiful painting
+in the world, and after taking you where it was should insist upon
+having your eyes shut, you would likely suspect, either that he had
+no painting or that it was some pitiable daub. Should he tell you
+that he was a most excellent performer on the violin, and yet
+refuse to play unless your ears were stopped, you would think, to
+say the least of it, that he had an odd way of convincing you of
+his musical ability. But would his conduct be any more wonderful
+than that of a religionist who asks that before examining his creed
+you will have the kindness to throw away your reason? The first
+gentleman says, "Keep your eyes shut, my picture will bear
+everything but being seen;" "Keep your ears stopped, my music
+objects to nothing but being heard." The last says, "Away with your
+reason, my religion dreads nothing but being understood."</p>
+<p>So far as I am concerned, I most cheerfully admit that most
+Christians are honest, and most ministers sincere. We do not attack
+them; we attack their creed. We accord to them the same rights that
+we ask for ourselves. We believe that their doctrines are hurtful.
+We believe that the frightful text, "He that believes shall be
+saved and he that believeth not shall be damned," has covered the
+earth with blood. It has filled the heart with arrogance, cruelty
+and murder. It has caused the religious wars; bound hundreds of
+thousands to the stake; founded inquisitions; filled dungeons;
+invented instruments of torture; taught the mother to hate her
+child; imprisoned the mind; filled the world with ignorance;
+persecuted the lovers of wisdom; built the monasteries and
+convents; made happiness a crime, investigation a sin, and
+self-reliance a blasphemy. It has poisoned the springs of learning;
+misdirected the energies of the world; filled all countries with
+want; housed the people in hovels; fed them with famine; and but
+for the efforts of a few brave Infidels it would have taken the
+world back to the midnight of barbarism, and left the heavens
+without a star.</p>
+<p>The maligners of Paine say that he had no right to attack this
+doctrine, because he was unacquainted with the dead languages; and
+for this reason, it was a piece of pure impudence in him to
+investigate the Scriptures.</p>
+<p>Is it necessary to understand Hebrew in order to know that
+cruelty is not a virtue, that murder is inconsistent with infinite
+goodness, and that eternal punishment can be inflicted upon man
+only by an eternal fiend? Is it really essential to conjugate the
+Greek verbs before you can make up your mind as to the probability
+of dead people getting out of their graves? Must one be versed in
+Latin before he is entitled to express his opinion as to the
+genuineness of a pretended revelation from God? Common sense
+belongs exclusively to no tongue. Logic is not confined to, nor has
+it been buried with, the dead languages. Paine attacked the Bible
+as it is translated. If the translation is wrong, let its defenders
+correct it.</p>
+<p>The Christianity of Paine's day is not the Christianity of our
+time. There has been a great improvement since then. One hundred
+and fifty years ago the foremost preachers of our time would have
+perished at the stake. A Universalist would have been torn in
+pieces in England, Scotland, and America. Unitarians would have
+found themselves in the stocks, pelted by the rabble with dead
+cats, after which their ears would have been cut off, their tongues
+bored, and their foreheads branded. Less than one hundred and fifty
+years ago the following law was in force in Maryland:</p>
+<p>"Be it enacted by the Right Honorable, the Lord Proprietor, by
+and with the advice and consent of his Lordship's governor, and the
+upper and lower houses of the Assembly, and the authority of the
+same:</p>
+<p>"That if any person shall hereafter, within this province,
+wittingly, maliciously, and advisedly, by writing or speaking,
+blaspheme or curse God, or deny our Saviour, Jesus Christ, to be
+the Son of God, or shall deny the Holy Trinity, the Father, Son,
+and Holy Ghost, or the Godhead of any of the three persons, or the
+unity of the Godhead, or shall utter any profane words concerning
+the Holy Trinity, or any of the persons thereof, and shall thereof
+be convict by verdict, shall, for the first offence, be bored
+through the tongue, and fined twenty pounds to be levied of his
+body. And for the second offence, the offender shall be stigmatized
+by burning in the forehead with the letter B, and fined forty
+pounds. And that for the third offence the offender shall suffer
+death without the benefit of clergy."</p>
+<p>The strange thing about this law is, that it has never been
+repealed, and is still in force in the District of Columbia. Laws
+like this were in force in most of the colonies, and in all
+countries where the church had power.</p>
+<p>In the Old Testament, the death penalty is attached to hundreds
+of offences. It has been the same in all Christian countries.
+To-day, in civilized governments, the death penalty is attached
+only to murder and treason; and in some it has been entirely
+abolished. What a commentary upon the divine systems of the
+world!</p>
+<p>In the day of Thomas Paine, the church was ignorant, bloody and
+relentless. In Scotland the "Kirk" was at the summit of its power.
+It was a full sister of the Spanish Inquisition. It waged war upon
+human nature. It was the enemy of happiness, the hater of joy, and
+the despiser of religious liberty. It taught parents to murder
+their children rather than to allow them to propagate error. If the
+mother held opinions of which the infamous "Kirk" disapproved, her
+children were taken from her arms, her babe from her very bosom,
+and she was not allowed to see them, or to write them a word. It
+would not allow shipwrecked sailors to be rescued from drowning on
+Sunday. It sought to annihilate pleasure, to pollute the heart by
+filling it with religious cruelty and gloom, and to change mankind
+into a vast horde of pious, heartless fiends. One of the most
+famous Scotch divines said: "The Kirk holds that religious
+toleration is not far from blasphemy." And this same Scotch Kirk
+denounced, beyond measure, the man who had the moral grandeur to
+say, "The world is my country, and to do good my religion." And
+this same Kirk abhorred the man who said, "Any system of religion
+that shocks the mind of a child cannot be a true system."</p>
+<p>At that time nothing so delighted the church as the beauties of
+endless torment, and listening to the weak wailings of damned
+infants struggling in the slimy coils and poison-folds of the worm
+that never dies.</p>
+<p>About the beginning of the nineteenth century, a boy by the name
+of Thomas Aikenhead, was indicted and tried at Edinburgh for having
+denied the inspiration of the Scriptures, and for having, on
+several occasions, when cold, wished himself in hell that he might
+get warm. Notwithstanding the poor boy recanted and begged for
+mercy, he was found guilty and hanged. His body was thrown in a
+hole at the foot of the scaffold and covered with stones.</p>
+<p>Prosecutions and executions like this were common in every
+Christian country, and all of them were based upon the belief that
+an intellectual conviction is a crime.</p>
+<p>No wonder the church hated and traduced the author of the "Age
+of Reason."</p>
+<p>England was filled with Puritan gloom and Episcopal ceremony.
+All religious conceptions were of the grossest nature. The ideas of
+crazy fanatics and extravagant poets were taken as sober facts.
+Milton had clothed Christianity in the soiled and faded finery of
+the gods&mdash;had added to the story of Christ the fables of
+Mythology. He gave to the Protestant Church the most outrageously
+material ideas of the Deity. He turned all the angels into
+soldiers&mdash;made heaven a battlefield, put Christ in uniform,
+and described God as a militia general. His works were considered
+by the Protestants nearly as sacred as the Bible itself, and the
+imagination of the people was thoroughly polluted by the horrible
+imagery, the sublime absurdity of the blind Milton.</p>
+<p>Heaven and hell were realities&mdash;the judgment-day was
+expected&mdash;books of account would be opened. Every man would
+hear the charges against him read. God was supposed to sit on a
+golden throne, surrounded by the tallest angels, with harps in
+their hands and crowns on their heads. The goats would be thrust
+into eternal fire on the left, while the orthodox sheep, on the
+right, were to gambol on sunny slopes forever and forever.</p>
+<p>The nation was profoundly ignorant, and consequently extremely
+religious, so far as belief was concerned.</p>
+<p>In Europe, Liberty was lying chained in the
+Inquisition&mdash;her white bosom stained with blood. In the New
+World the Puritans had been hanging and burning in the name of God,
+and selling white Quaker children into slavery in the name of
+Christ, who said, "Suffer little children to come unto me."</p>
+<p>Under such conditions progress was impossible. Some one had to
+lead the way. The church is, and always has been, incapable of a
+forward movement. Religion always looks back. The church has
+already reduced Spain to a guitar, Italy to a hand-organ, and
+Ireland to exile.</p>
+<p>Some one not connected with the church had to attack the monster
+that was eating out the heart of the world. Some one had to
+sacrifice himself for the good of all. The people were in the most
+abject slavery; their manhood had been taken from them by pomp, by
+pageantry and power. Progress is born of doubt and inquiry.</p>
+<p>The church never doubts&mdash;never inquires. To doubt is
+heresy&mdash;to inquire is to admit that you do not know&mdash;the
+church does neither.</p>
+<p>More than a century ago Catholisism, wrapped in robes red with
+the innocent blood of millions, holding in her frantic clutch
+crowns and scepters, honors and gold, the keys of heaven and hell,
+trampling beneath her feet the liberties of nations, in the proud
+moment of almost universal dominion, felt within her heartless
+breast the deadly dagger of Voltaire. From that blow the church
+never can recover. Livid with hatred she launched her eternal
+anathema at the great destroyer, and ignorant Protestants have
+echoed the curse of Rome.</p>
+<p>In our country the church was all-powerful, and although divided
+into many sects, would instantly unite to repel a common foe.</p>
+<p>Paine struck the first grand blow.</p>
+<p>The "Age of Reason" did more to undermine the power of the
+Protestant Church than all other books then known. It furnished an
+immense amount of food for thought. It was written for the average
+mind, and is a straightforward, honest investigation of the Bible,
+and of the Christian system.</p>
+<p>Paine did not falter, from the first page to the last. He gives
+you his candid thought, and candid thoughts are always
+valuable.</p>
+<p>The "Age of Reason" has liberalized us all. It put arguments in
+the mouths of the people; it put the church on the defensive; it
+enabled somebody in every village to corner the parson; it made the
+world wiser, and the church better; it took power from the pulpit
+and divided it among the pews.</p>
+<p>Just in proportion that the human race has advanced, the church
+has lost power. There is no exception to this rule.</p>
+<p>No nation ever materially advanced that held strictly to the
+religion of its founders.</p>
+<p>No nation ever gave itself wholly to the control of the church
+without losing its power, its honor, and existence.</p>
+<p>Every church pretends to have found the exact truth. This is the
+end of progress. Why pursue that which you have? Why investigate
+when you know?</p>
+<p>Every creed is a rock in running water: humanity sweeps by it.
+Every creed cries to the universe, "Halt!" A creed is the ignorant
+Past bullying the enlightened Present.</p>
+<p>The ignorant are not satisfied with what can be demonstrated.
+Science is too slow for them, and so they invent creeds. They
+demand completeness. A sublime segment, a grand fragment, are of no
+value to them. They demand the complete circle&mdash;the entire
+structure.</p>
+<p>In music they want a melody with a recurring accent at measured
+periods. In religion they insist upon immediate answers to the
+questions of creation and destiny. The alpha and omega of all
+things must be in the alphabet of their superstition. A religion
+that cannot answer every question, and guess every conundrum is, in
+their estimation, worse than worthless. They desire a kind of
+theological dictionary&mdash;a religious ready reckoner, together
+with guide-boards at all crossings and turns. They mistake
+impudence for authority, solemnity for wisdom, and bathos for
+inspiration. The beginning and the end are what they demand. The
+grand flight of the eagle is nothing to them. They want the nest in
+which he was hatched, and especially the dry limb upon which he
+roosts. Anything that can be learned is hardly worth knowing. The
+present is considered of no value in itself. Happiness must not be
+expected this side of the clouds, and can only be attained by
+self-denial and faith; not selfdenial for the good of others, but
+for the salvation of your own sweet self.</p>
+<p>Paine denied the authority of bibles and creeds; this was his
+crime, and for this the world shut the door in his face, and
+emptied its slops upon him from the windows.</p>
+<p>I challenge the world to show that Thomas Paine ever wrote one
+line, one word in favor of tyranny&mdash;in favor of immorality;
+one line, one word against what he believed to be for the highest
+and best interest of mankind; one line, one word against justice,
+charity, or liberty, and yet he has been pursued as though he had
+been a fiend from hell. His memory has been execrated as though he
+had murdered some Uriah for his wife; driven some Hagar into the
+desert to starve with his child upon her bosom; defiled his own
+daughters; ripped open with the sword the sweet bodies of loving
+and innocent women; advised one brother to assassinate another;
+kept a harem with seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines,
+or had persecuted Christians even unto strange cities.</p>
+<p>The church has pursued Paine to deter others. No effort has been
+in any age of the world spared to crush out opposition. The church
+used painting, music and architecture, simply to degrade mankind.
+But there are men that nothing can awe. There have been at all
+times brave spirits that dared even the gods. Some proud head has
+always been above the waves. In every age some Diogenes has
+sacrificed to all the gods. True genius never cowers, and there is
+always some Samson feeling for the pillars of authority.</p>
+<p>Cathedrals and domes, and chimes and chants.&mdash;temples
+frescoed and groined and carved, and gilded with gold&mdash;altars
+and tapers, and paintings of virgin and babe&mdash;censer and
+chalice&mdash;chasuble, paten and alb&mdash;organs, and anthems and
+incense rising to the winged and blest&mdash;maniple, amice and
+stole&mdash;crosses and crosiers, tiaras and crowns&mdash;mitres
+and missals and masses&mdash;rosaries, relics and
+robes&mdash;martyrs and saints, and windows stained as with the
+blood of Christ&mdash;never, never for one moment awed the brave,
+proud spirit of the Infidel. He knew that all the pomp and glitter
+had been purchased with Liberty&mdash;that priceless jewel of the
+soul. In looking at the cathedral he remembered the dungeon. The
+music of the organ was not loud enough to drown the clank of
+fetters. He could not forget that the taper had lighted the fagot.
+He knew that the cross adorned the hilt of the sword, and so where
+others worshiped, he wept and scorned.</p>
+<p>The doubter, the investigator, the Infidel, have been the
+saviors of liberty. This truth is beginning to be realized, and the
+truly intellectual are honoring the brave thinkers of the past.</p>
+<p>But the church is as unforgiving as ever, and still wonders why
+any Infidel should be wicked enough to endeavor to destroy her
+power.</p>
+<p>I will tell the church why.</p>
+<p>You have imprisoned the human mind; you have been the enemy of
+liberty; you have burned us at the stake&mdash;wasted us upon slow
+fires&mdash;torn our flesh with iron; you have covered us with
+chains&mdash;treated us as outcasts; you have filled the world with
+fear; you have taken our wives and children from our arms; you have
+confiscated our property; you have denied us the right to testify
+in courts of justice; you have branded us with infamy; you have
+torn out our tongues; you have refused us burial. In the name of
+your religion, you have robbed us of every right; and after having
+inflicted upon us every evil that can be inflicted in this world,
+you have fallen upon your knees, and with clasped hands implored
+your God to torment us forever.</p>
+<p>Can you wonder that we hate your doctrines&mdash;that we despise
+your creeds&mdash;that we feel proud to know that we are beyond
+your power&mdash;that we are free in spite of you&mdash;that we can
+express our honest thought, and that the whole world is grandly
+rising into the blessed light?</p>
+<p>Can you wonder that we point with pride to the fact that
+Infidelity has ever been found battling for the rights of man, for
+the liberty of conscience, and for the happiness of all?</p>
+<p>Can you wonder that we are proud to know that we have always
+been disciples of Reason, and soldiers of Freedom; that we have
+denounced tyranny and superstition, and have kept our hands
+unstained with human blood?</p>
+<p>We deny that religion is the end or object of this life. When it
+is so considered it becomes destructive of happiness&mdash;the real
+end of life. It becomes a hydra-headed monster, reaching in
+terrible coils from the heavens, and thrusting its thousand fangs
+into the bleeding, quivering hearts of men. It devours their
+substance, builds palaces for God, (who dwells not in temples made
+with hands,) and allows his children to die in huts and hovels. It
+fills the earth with mourning, heaven with hatred, the present with
+fear, and all the future with despair.</p>
+<p>Virtue is a subordination of the passions to the intellect. It
+is to act in accordance with your highest convictions. It does not
+consist in believing, but in doing. This is the sublime truth that
+the Infidels in all ages have uttered. They have handed the torch
+from one to the other through all the years that have fled. Upon
+the altar of Reason they have kept the sacred fire, and through the
+long midnight of faith they fed the divine flame.</p>
+<p>Infidelity is liberty; all religion is slavery. In every creed
+man is the slave of God&mdash;woman is the slave of man and the
+sweet children are the slaves of all.</p>
+<p>We do not want creeds; we want knowledge&mdash;we want
+happiness.</p>
+<p>And yet we are told by the church that we have accomplished
+nothing; that we are simply destroyers; that we tear down without
+building again.</p>
+<p>Is it nothing to free the mind? Is it nothing to civilize
+mankind? Is it nothing to fill the world with light, with
+discovery, with science? Is it nothing to dignify man and exalt the
+intellect? Is it nothing to grope your way into the dreary prisons,
+the damp and dropping dungeons, the dark and silent cells of
+superstition, where the souls of men are chained to floors of
+stone; to greet them like a ray of light, like the song of a bird,
+the murmur of a stream; to see the dull eyes open and grow slowly
+bright; to feel yourself grasped by the shrunken and unused hands,
+and hear yourself thanked by a strange and hollow voice?</p>
+<p>Is it nothing to conduct these souls gradually into the blessed
+light of day&mdash;to let them see again the happy fields, the
+sweet, green earth, and hear the everlasting music of the waves? Is
+it nothing to make men wipe the dust from their swollen knees, the
+tears from their blanched and furrowed cheeks? Is it a small thing
+to reave the heavens of an insatiate monster and write upon the
+eternal dome, glittering with stars, the grand
+word&mdash;Freedom?</p>
+<p>Is it a small thing to quench the flames of hell with the holy
+tears of pity&mdash;to unbind the martyr from the stake&mdash;break
+all the chains&mdash;put out the fires of civil war&mdash;stay the
+sword of the fanatic, and tear the bloody hands of the Church from
+the white throat of Science?</p>
+<p>Is it a small thing to make men truly free&mdash;to destroy the
+dogmas of ignorance, prejudice and power&mdash;the poisoned fables
+of superstition, and drive from the beautiful face of the earth the
+fiend of Fear?</p>
+<p>It does seem as though the most zealous Christian must at times
+entertain some doubt as to the divine origin of his religion. For
+eighteen hundred years the doctrine has been preached. For more
+than a thousand years the church had, to a great extent, the
+control of the civilized world, and what has been the result? Are
+the Christian nations patterns of charity and forbearance? On the
+contrary, their principal business is to destroy each other. More
+than five millions of Christians are trained, educated, and drilled
+to murder their fellow-christians. Every nation is groaning under a
+vast debt incurred in carrying on war against other Christians, or
+defending itself from Christian assault. The world is covered with
+forts to protect Christians from Christians, and every sea is
+covered with iron monsters ready to blow Christian brains into
+eternal froth. Millions upon millions are annually expended in the
+effort to construct still more deadly and terrible engines of
+death. Industry is crippled, honest toil is robbed, and even
+beggary is taxed to defray the expenses of Christian warfare. There
+must be some other way to reform this world. We have tried creed,
+and dogma and fable, and they have failed; and they have failed in
+all the nations dead.</p>
+<p>The people perish for the lack of knowledge.</p>
+<p>Nothing but education&mdash;scientific education&mdash;can
+benefit mankind. We must find out the laws of nature and conform to
+them.</p>
+<p>We need free bodies and free minds,&mdash;free labor and free
+thought,&mdash;chainless hands and fetterless brains. Free labor
+will give us wealth. Free thought will give us truth.</p>
+<p>We need men with moral courage to speak and write their real
+thoughts, and to stand by their convictions, even to the very
+death. We need have no fear of being too radical. The future will
+verify all grand and brave predictions. Paine was splendidly in
+advance of his time; but he was orthodox compared with the Infidels
+of to-day.</p>
+<p>Science, the great Iconoclast, has been busy since 1809, and by
+the highway of Progress are the broken images of the Past.</p>
+<p>On every hand the people advance. The Vicar of God has been
+pushed from the throne of the Caesars, and upon the roofs of the
+Eternal City falls once more the shadow of the Eagle.</p>
+<p>All has been accomplished by the heroic few. The men of science
+have explored heaven and earth, and with infinite patience have
+furnished the facts. The brave thinkers have used them. The gloomy
+caverns of superstition have been transformed into temples of
+thought, and the demons of the past are the angels of to-day.</p>
+<p>Science took a handful of sand, constructed a telescope, and
+with it explored the starry depths of heaven. Science wrested from
+the gods their thunderbolts; and now, the electric spark, freighted
+with thought and love, flashes under all the waves of the sea.
+Science took a tear from the cheek of unpaid labor, converted it
+into steam, created a giant that turns with tireless arm, the
+countless wheels of toil.</p>
+<p>Thomas Paine was one of the intellectual heroes&mdash;one of the
+men to whom we are indebted. His name is associated forever with
+the Great Republic. As long as free government exists he will be
+remembered, admired and honored.</p>
+<p>He lived a long, laborious and useful life. The world is better
+for his having lived. For the sake of truth he accepted hatred and
+reproach for his portion. He ate the bitter bread of sorrow. His
+friends were untrue to him because he was true to himself, and true
+to them. He lost the respect of what is called society, but kept
+his own. His life is what the world calls failure and what history
+calls success.</p>
+<p>If to love your fellow-men more than self is goodness, Thomas
+Paine was good.</p>
+<p>If to be in advance of your time&mdash;to be a pioneer in the
+direction of right&mdash;is greatness, Thomas Paine was great.</p>
+<p>If to avow your principles and discharge your duty in the
+presence of death is heroic, Thomas Paine was a hero.</p>
+<p>At the age of seventy-three, death touched his tired heart. He
+died in the land his genius defended&mdash;under the flag he gave
+to the skies. Slander cannot touch him now&mdash;hatred cannot
+reach him more. He sleeps in the sanctuary of the tomb, beneath the
+quiet of the stars.</p>
+<p>A few more years&mdash;a few more brave men&mdash;a few more
+rays of light, and mankind will venerate the memory of him who
+said:</p>
+<p>"ANY SYSTEM OF RELIGION THAT SHOCKS THE MIND OF A CHILD CANNOT
+BE A TRUE SYSTEM;"</p>
+<p>"The world is my Country, and to do good my Religion."</p>
+<a name="link0005"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>INDIVIDUALITY.</h2>
+<h3>"His Soul was like a Star and dwelt apart."</h3>
+<p>ON every hand are the enemies of individuality and mental
+freedom. Custom meets us at the cradle and leaves us only at the
+tomb. Our first questions are answered by ignorance, and our last
+by superstition. We are pushed and dragged by countless hands along
+the beaten track, and our entire training can be summed up in the
+word&mdash;suppression. Our desire to have a thing or to do a thing
+is considered as conclusive evidence that we ought not to have it,
+and ought not to do it. At every turn we run against cherubim and a
+flaming sword guarding some entrance to the Eden of our desire. We
+are allowed to investigate all subjects in which we feel no
+particular interest, and to express the opinions of the majority
+with the utmost freedom. We are taught that liberty of speech
+should never be carried to the extent of contradicting the dead
+witnesses of a popular superstition. Society offers continual
+rewards for self-betrayal, and they are nearly all earned and
+claimed, and some are paid.</p>
+<p>We have all read accounts of Christian gentlemen remarking, when
+about to be hanged, how much better it would have been for them if
+they had only followed a mother's advice. But after all, how
+fortunate it is for the world that the maternal advice has not
+always been followed. How fortunate it is for us all that it is
+somewhat unnatural for a human being to obey. Universal obedience
+is universal stagnation; disobedience is one of the conditions of
+progress. Select any age of the world and tell me what would have
+been the effect of implicit obedience. Suppose the church had had
+absolute control of the human mind at any time, would not the words
+liberty and progress have been blotted from human speech? In
+defiance of advice, the world has advanced.</p>
+<p>Suppose the astronomers had controlled the science of astronomy;
+suppose the doctors had controlled the science of medicine; suppose
+kings had been left to fix the forms of government; suppose our
+fathers had taken the advice of Paul, who said, "be subject to the
+powers that be, because they are ordained of God;" suppose the
+church could control the world to-day, we would go back to chaos
+and old night. Philosophy would be branded as infamous; Science
+would again press its pale and thoughtful face against the prison
+bars, and round the limbs of liberty would climb the bigot's
+flame.</p>
+<p>It is a blessed thing that in every age some one has had
+individuality enough and courage enough to stand by his own
+convictions,&mdash;some one who had the grandeur to say his say. I
+believe it was Magellan who said, "The church says the earth is
+flat; but I have seen its shadow on the moon, and I have more
+confidence even in a shadow than in the church." On the prow of his
+ship were disobedience, defiance, scorn, and success.</p>
+<p>The trouble with most people is, they bow to what is called
+authority; they have a certain reverence for the old because it is
+old. They think a man is better for being dead, especially if he
+has been dead a long time. They think the fathers of their nation
+were the greatest and best of all mankind. All these things they
+implicitly believe because it is popular and patriotic, and because
+they were told so when they were very small, and remember
+distinctly of hearing mother read it out of a book. It is hard to
+over-estimate the influence of early training in the direction of
+superstition. You first teach children that a certain book is
+true&mdash;that it was written by God himself&mdash;that to
+question its truth is a sin, that to deny it is a crime, and that
+should they die without believing that book they will be forever
+damned without benefit of clergy. The consequence is, that long
+before they read that book, they believe it to be true. When they
+do read it their minds are wholly unfitted to investigate its
+claims. They accept it as a matter of course.</p>
+<p>In this way the reason is overcome, the sweet instincts of
+humanity are blotted from the heart, and while reading its infamous
+pages even justice throws aside her scales, shrieking for revenge,
+and charity, with bloody hands, applauds a deed of murder. In this
+way we are taught that the revenge of man is the justice of God;
+that mercy is not the same everywhere. In this way the ideas of our
+race have been subverted. In this way we have made tyrants, bigots,
+and inquisitors. In this way the brain of man has become a kind of
+palimpsest upon which, and over the writings of nature,
+superstition has scrawled her countless lies. One great trouble is
+that most teachers are dishonest. They teach as certainties those
+things concerning which they entertain doubts. They do not say, "we
+<i>think</i> this is so," but "we <i>know</i> this is so." They do
+not appeal to the reason of the pupil, but they command his faith.
+They keep all doubts to themselves; they do not explain, they
+assert. All this is infamous. In this way you may make Christians,
+but you cannot make men; you cannot make women. You can make
+followers, but no leaders; disciples, but no Christs. You may
+promise power, honor, and happiness to all those who will blindly
+follow, but you cannot keep your promise.</p>
+<p>A monarch said to a hermit, "Come with me and I will give you
+power."</p>
+<p>"I have all the power that I know how to use" replied the
+hermit.</p>
+<p>"Come," said the king, "I will give you wealth."</p>
+<p>"I have no wants that money can supply," said the hermit.</p>
+<p>"I will give you honor," said the monarch.</p>
+<p>"Ah, honor cannot be given, it must be earned," was the hermit's
+answer.</p>
+<p>"Come," said the king, making a last appeal, "and I will give
+you happiness."</p>
+<p>"No," said the man of solitude, "there is no happiness without
+liberty, and he who follows cannot be free."</p>
+<p>"You shall have liberty too," said the king.</p>
+<p>"Then I will stay where I am," said the old man.</p>
+<p>And all the king's courtiers thought the hermit a fool.</p>
+<p>Now and then somebody examines, and in spite of all keeps his
+manhood, and has the courage to follow where his reason leads. Then
+the pious get together and repeat wise saws, and exchange knowing
+nods and most prophetic winks. The stupidly wise sit owl-like on
+the dead limbs of the tree of knowledge, and solemnly hoot. Wealth
+sneers, and fashion laughs, and respectability passes by on the
+other side, and scorn points with all her skinny fingers, and all
+the snakes of superstition writhe and hiss, and slander lends her
+tongue, and infamy her brand, and perjury her oath, and the law its
+power, and bigotry tortures, and the church kills.</p>
+<p>The church hates a thinker precisely for the same reason a
+robber dislikes a sheriff, or a thief despises the prosecuting
+witness. Tyranny likes courtiers, flatterers, followers, fawners,
+and superstition wants believers, disciples, zealots, hypocrites,
+and subscribers. The church demands worship&mdash;the very thing
+that man should give to no being, human or divine. To worship
+another is to degrade yourself. Worship is awe and dread and vague
+fear and blind hope. It is the spirit of worship that elevates the
+one and degrades the many; that builds palaces for robbers, erects
+monuments to crime, and forges manacles even for its own hands. The
+spirit of worship is the spirit of tyranny. The worshiper always
+regrets that he is not the worshiped. We should all remember that
+the intellect has no knees, and that whatever the attitude of the
+body may be, the brave soul is always found erect. Whoever
+worships, abdicates. Whoever believes at the command of power,
+tramples his own individuality beneath his feet, and voluntarily
+robs himself of all that renders man superior to the brute.</p>
+<p>The despotism of faith is justified upon the ground that
+Christian countries are the grandest and most prosperous of the
+world. At one time the same thing could have been truly said in
+India, in Egypt, in Greece, in Rome, and in every other country
+that has, in the history of the world, swept to empire. This
+argument proves too much not only, but the assumption upon which it
+is based is utterly false. Numberless circumstances and countless
+conditions have produced the prosperity of the Christian world. The
+truth is, we have advanced in spite of religious zeal, ignorance,
+and opposition. The church has won no victories for the rights of
+man. Luther labored to reform the church&mdash;Voltaire, to reform
+men. Over every fortress of tyranny has waved, and still waves, the
+banner of the church. Wherever brave blood has been shed, the sword
+of the church has been wet. On every chain has been the sign of the
+cross. The altar and throne have leaned against and supported each
+other.</p>
+<p>All that is good in our civilization is the result of commerce,
+climate, soil, geographical position, industry, invention,
+discovery, art, and science. The church has been the enemy of
+progress, for the reason that it has endeavored to prevent man
+thinking for himself. To prevent thought is to prevent all
+advancement except in the direction of faith.</p>
+<p>Who can imagine the infinite impudence of a church assuming to
+think for the human race? Who can imagine the infinite impudence of
+a church that pretends to be the mouthpiece of God, and in his name
+threatens to inflict eternal punishment upon those who honestly
+reject its claims and scorn its pretensions? By what right does a
+man, or an organization of men, or a god, claim to hold a brain in
+bondage? When a fact can be demonstrated, force is unnecessary;
+when it cannot be demonstrated, an appeal to force is infamous. In
+the presence of the unknown all have an equal right to think.</p>
+<p>Over the vast plain, called life, we are all travelers, and not
+one traveler is perfectly certain that he is going in the right
+direction. True it is that no other plain is so well supplied with
+guide-boards. At every turn and crossing you will find them, and
+upon each one is written the exact direction and distance. One
+great trouble is, however, that these boards are all different, and
+the result is that most travelers are confused in proportion to the
+number they read. Thousands of people are around each of these
+signs, and each one is doing his best to convince the traveler that
+his particular board is the only one upon which the least reliance
+can be placed, and that if his road is taken the reward for so
+doing will be infinite and eternal, while all the other roads are
+said to lead to hell, and all the makers of the other guide-boards
+are declared to be heretics, hypocrites and liars. "Well," says a
+traveler, "you may be right in what you say, but allow me at least
+to read some of the other directions and examine a little into
+their claims. I wish to rely a little upon my own judgment in a
+matter of so great importance." "No, sir," shouts the zealot, "that
+is the very thing you are not allowed to do. You must go my way
+without investigation, or you are as good as damned already."
+"Well," says the traveler, "if that is so, I believe I had better
+go your way." And so most of them go along, taking the word of
+those who know as little as themselves. Now and then comes one who,
+in spite of all threats, calmly examines the claims of all, and as
+calmly rejects them all. These travelers take roads of their own,
+and are denounced by all the others, as infidels and atheists.</p>
+<p>Around all of these guide-boards, as far as the eye can reach,
+the ground is covered with mountains of human bones, crumbling and
+bleaching in the rain and sun. They are the bones of murdered men
+and women&mdash;fathers, mothers and babes.</p>
+<p>In my judgment, every human being should take a road of his own.
+Every mind should be true to itself&mdash;should think, investigate
+and conclude for itself. This is a duty alike incumbent upon pauper
+and prince. Every soul should repel dictation and tyranny, no
+matter from what source they come&mdash;from earth or heaven, from
+men or gods. Besides, every traveler upon this vast plain should
+give to every other traveler his best idea as to the road that
+should be taken. Each is entitled to the honest opinion of all. And
+there is but one way to get an honest opinion upon any subject
+whatever. The person giving the opinion must be free from fear. The
+merchant must not fear to lose his custom, the doctor his practice,
+nor the preacher his pulpit There can be no advance without
+liberty. Suppression of honest inquiry is retrogression, and must
+end in intellectual night. The tendency of orthodox religion to-day
+is toward mental slavery and barbarism. Not one of the orthodox
+ministers dare preach what he thinks if he knows a majority of his
+congregation think otherwise. He knows that every member of his
+church stands guard over his brain with a creed, like a club, in
+his hand. He knows that he is not expected to search after the
+truth, but that he is employed to defend the creed. Every pulpit is
+a pillory, in which stands a hired culprit, defending the justice
+of his own imprisonment.</p>
+<p>Is it desirable that all should be exactly alike in their
+religious convictions? Is any such thing possible? Do we not know
+that there are no two persons alike in the whole world? No two,
+trees, no two leaves, no two anythings that are alike? Infinite
+diversity is the law. Religion tries to force all minds into one
+mould. Knowing that all cannot believe, the church endeavors to
+make all say they believe. She longs for the unity of hypocrisy,
+and detests the splendid diversity of individuality and
+freedom.</p>
+<p>Nearly all people stand in great horror of annihilation, and yet
+to give up your individuality is to annihilate yourself. Mental
+slavery is mental death, and every man who has given up his
+intellectual freedom is the living coffin of his dead soul. In this
+sense, every church is a cemetery and every creed an epitaph.</p>
+<p>We should all remember that to be like other people is to be
+unlike ourselves, and that nothing can be more detestable in
+character than servile imitation. The great trouble with imitation
+is, that we are apt to ape those who are in reality far below us.
+After all, the poorest bargain that a human being can make, is to
+give his individuality for what is called respectability.</p>
+<p>There is no saying more degrading than this: "It is better to be
+the tail of a lion than the head of a dog." It is a responsibility
+to think and act for yourself. Most people hate responsibility;
+therefore they join something and become the tail of some lion.
+They say, "My party can act for me&mdash;my church can do my
+thinking. It is enough for me to pay taxes and obey the lion to
+which I belong, without troubling myself about the right, the
+wrong, or the why or the wherefore of anything whatever." These
+people are respectable. They hate reformers, and dislike
+exceedingly to have their minds disturbed. They regard convictions
+as very disagreeable things to have. They love forms, and enjoy,
+beyond everything else, telling what a splendid tail their lion
+has, and what a troublesome dog their neighbor is. Besides this
+natural inclination to avoid personal responsibility, is and always
+has been, the fact, that every religionist has warned men against
+the presumption and wickedness of thinking for themselves. The
+reason has been denounced by all Christendom as the only unsafe
+guide. The church has left nothing undone to prevent man following
+the logic of his brain. The plainest facts have been covered with
+the mantle of mystery. The grossest absurdities have been declared
+to be self-evident facts. The order of nature has been, as it were,
+reversed, that the hypocritical few might govern the honest many.
+The man who stood by the conclusion of his reason was denounced as
+a scorner and hater of God and his holy church. From the
+organization of the first church until this moment, to think your
+own thoughts has been inconsistent with membership. Every member
+has borne the marks of collar, and chain, and whip. No man ever
+seriously attempted to reform a church without being cast out and
+hunted down by the hounds of hypocrisy. The highest crime against a
+creed is to change it. Reformation is treason.</p>
+<p>Thousands of young men are being educated at this moment by the
+various churches. What for? In order that they may be prepared to
+investigate the phenomena by which we are surrounded? No! The
+object, and the only object, is that they may be prepared to defend
+a creed; that they may learn the arguments of their respective
+churches, and repeat them in the dull ears of a thoughtless
+congregation. If one, after being thus trained at the expense of
+the Methodists, turns Presbyterian or Baptist, he is denounced as
+an ungrateful wretch. Honest investigation is utterly impossible
+within the pale of any church, for the reason, that if you think
+the church is right you will not investigate, and if you think it
+wrong, the church will investigate you. The consequence of this is,
+that most of the theological literature is the result of
+suppression, of fear, tyranny and hypocrisy.</p>
+<p>Every orthodox writer necessarily said to himself, "If I write
+that, my wife and children may want for bread. I will be covered
+with shame and branded with infamy; but if I write this, I will
+gain position, power, and honor. My church rewards defenders, and
+burns reformers."</p>
+<p>Under these conditions all your Scotts, Hen-rys, and McKnights
+have written; and weighed in these scales, what are their
+commentaries worth? They are not the ideas and decisions of honest
+judges, but the sophisms of the paid attorneys of superstition. Who
+can tell what the world has lost by this infamous system of
+suppression? How many grand thinkers have died with the mailed hand
+of superstition upon their lips? How many splendid ideas have
+perished in the cradle of the brain, strangled in the poison-coils
+of that python, the Church!</p>
+<p>For thousands of years a thinker was hunted down like an escaped
+convict. To him who had braved the church, every door was shut,
+every knife was open. To shelter him from the wild storm, to give
+him a crust when dying, to put a cup of water to his cracked and
+bleeding lips; these were all crimes, not one of which the church
+ever did forgive; and with the justice taught of her God, his
+helpless children were exterminated as scorpions and vipers.</p>
+<p>Who at the present day can imagine the courage, the devotion to
+principle, the intellectual and moral grandeur it once required to
+be an infidel, to brave the church, her racks, her fagots, her
+dungeons, her tongues of fire,&mdash;to defy and scorn her heaven
+and her hell&mdash;her devil and her God? They were the noblest
+sons of earth. They were the real saviors of our race, the
+destroyers of superstition and the creators of Science. They were
+the real Titans who bared their grand foreheads to all the
+thunderbolts of all the gods.</p>
+<p>The church has been, and still is, the great robber. She has
+rifled not only the pockets but the brains of the world. She is the
+stone at the sepulchre of liberty; the upas tree, in whose shade
+the intellect of man has withered; the Gorgon beneath whose gaze
+the human heart has turned to stone. Under her influence even the
+Protestant mother expects to be happy in heaven, while her brave
+boy, who fell fighting for the rights of man, shall writhe in
+hell.</p>
+<p>It is said that some of the Indian tribes place the heads of
+their children between pieces of bark until the form of the skull
+is permanently changed. To us this seems a most shocking custom;
+and yet, after all, is it as bad as to put the souls of our
+children in the strait-jacket of a creed? to so utterly deform
+their minds that they regard the God of the Bible as a being of
+infinite mercy, and really consider it a virtue to believe a thing
+just because it seems unreasonable? Every child in the Christian
+world has uttered its wondering protest against this outrage. All
+the machinery of the church is constantly employed in corrupting
+the reason of children. In every possible way they are robbed of
+their own thoughts and forced to accept the statements of others.
+Every Sunday school has for its object the crushing out of every
+germ of individuality. The poor children are taught that nothing
+can be more acceptable to God than unreasoning obedience and
+eyeless faith, and that to believe God did an impossible act, is
+far better than to do a good one yourself. They are told that all
+religions have been simply the John-the-Baptists of ours; that all
+the gods of antiquity have withered and shrunken into the Jehovah
+of the Jews; that all the longings and aspirations of the race are
+realized in the motto of the Evangelical Alliance, "Liberty in
+non-essentials", that all there is, or ever was, of religion can be
+found in the apostles' creed; that there is nothing left to be
+discovered; that all the thinkers are dead, and all the living
+should simply be believers; that we have only to repeat the epitaph
+found on the grave of wisdom; that grave-yards are the best
+possible universities, and that the children must be forever beaten
+with the bones of the fathers.</p>
+<p>It has always seemed absurd to suppose that a god would choose
+for his companions, during all eternity, the dear souls whose
+highest and only ambition is to obey. He certainly would now and
+then be tempted to make the same remark made by an English
+gentleman to his poor guest. The gentleman had invited a man in
+humble circumstances to dine with him. The man was so overcome with
+the honor that to everything the gentleman said he replied "Yes."
+Tired at last with the monotony of acquiescence, the gentleman
+cried out, "For God's sake, my good man, say 'No,' just once, so
+there will be two of us."</p>
+<p>Is it possible that an infinite God created this world simply to
+be the dwelling-place of slaves and serfs? simply for the purpose
+of raising orthodox Christians? That he did a few miracles to
+astonish them; that all the evils of life are simply his
+punishments, and that he is finally going to turn heaven into a
+kind of religious museum filled with Baptist barnacles, petrified
+Presbyterians and Methodist mummies? I want no heaven for which I
+must give my reason; no happiness in exchange for my liberty, and
+no immortality that demands the surrender of my individuality.
+Better rot in the windowless tomb, to which there is no door but
+the red mouth of the pallid worm, than wear the jeweled collar even
+of a god.</p>
+<p>Religion does not, and cannot, contemplate man as free. She
+accepts only the homage of the prostrate, and scorns the offerings
+of those who stand erect. She cannot tolerate the liberty of
+thought. The wide and sunny fields belong not to her domain. The
+star-lit heights of genius and individuality are above and beyond
+her appreciation and power. Her subjects cringe at her feet,
+covered with the dust of obedience.</p>
+<p>They are not athletes standing posed by rich life and brave
+endeavor like antique statues, but shriveled deformities, studying
+with furtive glance the cruel face of power.</p>
+<p>No religionist seems capable of comprehending this plain truth.
+There is this difference between thought and action: for our
+actions we are responsible to ourselves and to those injuriously
+affected; for thoughts, there can, in the nature of things, be no
+responsibility to gods or men, here or hereafter. And yet the
+Protestant has vied with the Catholic in denouncing freedom of
+thought; and while I was taught to hate Catholicism with every drop
+of my blood, it is only justice to say, that in all essential
+particulars it is precisely the same as every other religion.
+Luther denounced mental liberty with all the coarse and brutal
+vigor of his nature; Calvin despised, from the very bottom of his
+petrified heart, anything that even looked like religious
+toleration, and solemnly declared that to advocate it was to
+crucify Christ afresh. All the founders of all the orthodox
+churches have advocated the same infamous tenet. The truth is, that
+what is called religion is necessarily inconsistent with free
+thought A believer is a bird in a cage, a Freethinker is an eagle
+parting the clouds with tireless wing.</p>
+<p>At present, owing to the inroads that have been made by liberals
+and infidels, most of the churches pretend to be in favor of
+religious liberty. Of these churches, we will ask this question:
+How can a man, who conscientiously believes in religious liberty,
+worship a God who does not? They say to us: "We will not imprison
+you on account of your belief, but our God will." "We will not burn
+you because you throw away the sacred Scriptures, but their author
+will." "We think it an infamous crime to persecute our brethren for
+opinion's sake,&mdash;but the God, whom we ignorantly worship, will
+on that account, damn his own children forever."</p>
+<p>Why is it that these Christians not only detest the infidels,
+but cordially despise each other? Why do they refuse to worship in
+the temples of each other? Why do they care so little for the
+damnation of men, and so much for the baptism of children? Why will
+they adorn their churches with the money of thieves and flatter
+vice for the sake of subscriptions? Why will they attempt to bribe
+Science to certify to the writings of God? Why do they torture the
+words of the great into an acknowledgment of the truth of
+Christianity? Why do they stand with hat in hand before presidents,
+kings, emperors, and scientists, begging, like Lazarus, for a few
+crumbs of religious comfort? Why are they so delighted to find an
+allusion to Providence in the message of Lincoln? Why are they so
+afraid that some one will find out that Paley wrote an essay in
+favor of the Epicurean philosophy, and that Sir Isaac Newton was
+once an infidel? Why are they so anxious to show that Voltaire
+recanted; that Paine died palsied with fear; that the Emperor
+Julian cried out "Galilean, thou hast conquered"; that Gibbon died
+a Catholic; that Agassiz had a little confidence in Moses; that the
+old Napoleon was once complimentary enough to say that he thought
+Christ greater than himself or C&aelig;sar; that Washington was
+caught on his knees at Valley Forge; that blunt old Ethan Allen
+told his child to believe the religion of her mother; that Franklin
+said, "Don't unchain the tiger," and that Volney got frightened in
+a storm at sea?</p>
+<p>Is it because the foundation of their temple is crumbling,
+because the walls are cracked, the pillars leaning, the great dome
+swaying to its fall, and because Science has written over the high
+altar its mene, mene, tekel, upharsin&mdash;the old words, destined
+to be the epitaph of all religions?</p>
+<p>Every assertion of individual independence has been a step
+toward infidelity. Luther started toward Humboldt,&mdash;Wesley,
+toward John Stuart Mill. To really reform the church is to destroy
+it. Every new religion has a little less superstition than the old,
+so that the religion of Science is but a question of time.</p>
+<p>I will not say the church has been an unmitigated evil in all
+respects. Its history is infamous and glorious. It has delighted in
+the production of extremes. It has furnished murderers for its own
+martyrs. It has sometimes fed the body, but has always starved the
+soul. It has been a charitable highwayman&mdash;a profligate
+beggar&mdash;a generous pirate. It has produced some angels and a
+multitude of devils. It has built more prisons than asylums. It
+made a hundred orphans while it cared for one. In one hand it has
+carried the alms-dish and in the other a sword. It has founded
+schools and endowed universities for the purpose of destroying true
+learning. It filled the world with hypocrites and zealots, and upon
+the cross of its own Christ it crucified the individuality of man.
+It has sought to destroy the independence of the soul and put the
+world upon its knees. This is its crime. The commission of this
+crime was necessary to its existence. In order to compel obedience
+it declared that it had the truth, and all the truth; that God had
+made it the keeper of his secrets; his agent and his vicegerent. It
+declared that all other religions were false and infamous. It
+rendered all compromise impossible and all thought superfluous.
+Thought was its enemy, obedience was its friend. Investigation was
+fraught with danger; therefore investigation was suppressed. The
+holy of holies was behind the curtain. All this was upon the
+principle that forgers hate to have the signature examined by an
+expert, and that imposture detests curiosity.</p>
+<p>"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear," has always been the
+favorite text of the church.</p>
+<p>In short, Christianity has always opposed every forward movement
+of the human race. Across the highway of progress it has always
+been building breastworks of Bibles, tracts, commentaries,
+prayer-books, creeds, dogmas and platforms, and at every advance
+the Christians have gathered together behind these heaps of rubbish
+and shot the poisoned arrows of malice at the soldiers of
+freedom.</p>
+<p>And even the liberal Christian of to-day has his holy of holies,
+and in the niche of the temple of his heart has his idol. He still
+clings to a part of the old superstition, and all the pleasant
+memories of the old belief linger in the horizon of his thoughts
+like a sunset. We associate the memory of those we love with the
+religion of our childhood. It seems almost a sacrilege to rudely
+destroy the idols that our fathers worshiped, and turn their sacred
+and beautiful truths into the fables of barbarism. Some throw away
+the Old Testament and cling to the New, while others give up
+everything except the idea that there is a personal God, and that
+in some wonderful way we are the objects of his care.</p>
+<p>Even this, in my opinion, as Science, the great iconoclast,
+marches onward, will have to be abandoned with the rest. The great
+ghost will surely share the fate of the little ones. They fled at
+the first appearance of the dawn, and the other will vanish with
+the perfect day. Until then the independence of man is little more
+than a dream. Overshadowed by an immense personality, in the
+presence of the irresponsible and the infinite, the individuality
+of man is lost, and he falls prostrate in the very dust of fear.
+Beneath the frown of the absolute, man stands a wretched, trembling
+slave,&mdash;beneath his smile he is at best only a fortunate serf.
+Governed by a being whose arbitrary will is law, chained to the
+chariot of power, his destiny rests in the pleasure of the unknown.
+Under these circumstances, what wretched object can he have in
+lengthening out his aimless life?</p>
+<p>And yet, in most minds, there is a vague fear of the
+gods&mdash;a shrinking from the malice of the skies. Our fathers
+were slaves, and nearly all their children are mental serfs. The
+enfranchisement of the soul is a slow and painful process.
+Superstition, the mother of those hideous twins, Fear and Faith,
+from her throne of skulls, still rules the world, and will until
+the mind of woman ceases to be the property of priests.</p>
+<p>When women reason, and babes sit in the lap of philosophy, the
+victory of reason over the shadowy host of darkness will be
+complete.</p>
+<p>In the minds of many, long after the intellect has thrown aside
+as utterly fabulous the legends of the church, there still remains
+a lingering suspicion, born of the mental habits contracted in
+childhood, that after all there may be a grain of truth in these
+mountains of theological mist, and that possibly the superstitious
+side is the side of safety.</p>
+<p>A gentleman, walking among the ruins of Athens, came upon a
+fallen statue of Jupiter; making an exceedingly low bow he said: "O
+Jupiter! I salute thee." He then added: "Should you ever sit upon
+the throne of heaven again, do not, I pray you, forget that I
+treated you politely when you were prostrate."</p>
+<p>We have all been taught by the church that nothing is so well
+calculated to excite the ire of the Deity as to express a doubt as
+to his existence, and that to deny it is an unpardonable sin.
+Numerous well-attested instances are referred to of atheists being
+struck dead for denying the existence of God. According to these
+religious people, God is infinitely above us in every respect,
+infinitely merciful, and yet he cannot bear to hear a poor finite
+man honestly question his existence. Knowing, as he does, that his
+children are groping in darkness and struggling with doubt and
+fear; knowing that he could enlighten them if he would, he still
+holds the expression of a sincere doubt as to his existence, the
+most infamous of crimes. According to orthodox logic, God having
+furnished us with imperfect minds, has a right to demand a perfect
+result.</p>
+<p>Suppose Mr. Smith should overhear a couple of small bugs holding
+a discussion as to the existence of Mr. Smith, and suppose one
+should have the temerity to declare, upon the honor of a bug, that
+he had examined the whole question to the best of his ability,
+including the argument based upon design, and had come to the
+conclusion that no man by the name of Smith had ever lived. Think
+then of Mr. Smith flying into an ecstasy of rage, crushing the
+atheist bug beneath his iron heel, while he exclaimed, "I will
+teach you, blasphemous wretch, that Smith is a diabolical fact!"
+What then can we think of a God who would open the artillery of
+heaven upon one of his own children for simply expressing his
+honest thought? And what man who really thinks can help repeating
+the words of Ennius: "If there are gods they certainly pay no
+attention to the affairs of man."</p>
+<p>Think of the millions of men and women who have been destroyed
+simply for loving and worshiping this God. Is it possible that this
+God, having infinite power, saw his loving and heroic children
+languishing in the darkness of dungeons; heard the clank of their
+chains when they lifted their hands to him in the agony of prayer;
+saw them stretched upon the bigot's rack, where death alone had
+pity; saw the serpents of flame crawl hissing round their shrinking
+forms&mdash;-saw all this for sixteen hundred years, and sat as
+silent as a stone?</p>
+<p>From such a God, why should man expect assistance? Why should he
+waste his days in fruitless prayer? Why should he fall upon his
+knees and implore a phantom&mdash;a phantom that is deaf, and dumb,
+and blind?</p>
+<p>Although we live in what is called a free government,&mdash;and
+politically we are free,&mdash;there is but little religious
+liberty in America. Society demands, either that you belong to some
+church, or that you suppress your opinions. It is contended by many
+that ours is a Christian government, founded upon the Bible, and
+that all who look upon that book as false or foolish are destroying
+the foundation of our country. The truth is, our government is not
+founded upon the rights of gods, but upon the rights of men. Our
+Constitution was framed, not to declare and uphold the deity of
+Christ, but the sacredness of humanity. Ours is the first
+government made by the people and for the people. It is the only
+nation with which the gods have had nothing to do. And yet there
+are some judges dishonest and cowardly enough to solemnly decide
+that this is a Christian country, and that our free institutions
+are based upon the infamous laws of Jehovah. Such judges are the
+Jeffries of the church. They believe that decisions, made by
+hirelings at the bidding of kings, are binding upon man forever.
+They regard old law as far superior to modern justice. They are
+what might be called orthodox judges. They spend their days in
+finding out, not what ought to be, but what has been. With their
+backs to the sunrise they worship the night. There is only one
+future event with which they concern themselves, and that is their
+reelection. No honest court ever did, or ever will, decide that our
+Constitution is Christian. The Bible teaches that the powers that
+be, are ordained of God. The Bible teaches that God is the source
+of all authority, and that all kings have obtained their power from
+him. Every tyrant has claimed to be the agent of the Most High. The
+Inquisition was founded, not in the name of man, but in the name of
+God. All the governments of Europe recognize the greatness of God,
+and the littleness of the people. In all ages, hypocrites, called
+priests, have put crowns upon the heads of thieves, called
+kings.</p>
+<p>The Declaration of Independence announces the sublime truth,
+that all power comes from the people. This was a denial, and the
+first denial of a nation, of the infamous dogma that God confers
+the right upon one man to govern others. It was the first grand
+assertion of the dignity of the human race. It declared the
+governed to be the source of power, and in fact denied the
+authority of any and all gods. Through the ages of
+slavery&mdash;through the weary centuries of the lash and chain,
+God was the acknowledged ruler of the world. To enthrone man, was
+to dethrone him.</p>
+<p>To Paine, Jefferson, and Franklin, are we indebted, more than to
+all others, for a human government, and for a Constitution in which
+no God is recognized superior to the legally expressed will of the
+people.</p>
+<p>They knew that to put God in the Constitution was to put man
+out. They knew that the recognition of a Deity would be seized upon
+by fanatics and zealots as a pretext for destroying the liberty of
+thought. They knew the terrible history of the church too well to
+place in her keeping, or in the keeping of her God, the sacred
+rights of man. They intended that all should have the right to
+worship, or not to worship; that our laws should make no
+distinction on account of creed. They intended to found and frame a
+government for man, and for man alone. They wished to preserve the
+individuality and liberty of all; to prevent the few from governing
+the many, and the many from persecuting and destroying the few.</p>
+<p>Notwithstanding all this, the spirit of persecution still
+lingers in our laws. In many of the States, only those who believe
+in the existence of some kind of God, are under the protection of
+the law.</p>
+<p>The supreme court of Illinois decided, in the year of grace
+1856, that an unbeliever in the existence of an intelligent First
+Cause could not be allowed to testify in any court. His wife and
+children might have been murdered before his very face, and yet in
+the absence of other witnesses, the murderer could not have even
+been indicted. The atheist was a legal outcast. To him, Justice was
+not only blind, but deaf. He was liable, like other men, to support
+the Government, and was forced to contribute his share towards
+paying the salaries of the very judges who decided that under no
+circumstances could his voice be heard in any court. This was the
+law of Illinois, and so remained until the adoption of the new
+Constitution. By such infamous means has the church endeavored to
+chain the human mind, and protect the majesty of her God. The fact
+is, we have no national religion, and no national God; but every
+citizen is allowed to have a religion and a God of his own, or to
+reject all religions and deny the existence of all gods. The
+church, however, never has, and never will understand and
+appreciate the genius of our Government.</p>
+<p>Last year, in a convention of Protestant bigots, held in the
+city of New York for the purpose of creating public opinion in
+favor of a religious amendment to the Federal Constitution, a
+reverend doctor of divinity, speaking of atheists, said: "What are
+the rights of the atheist? I would tolerate him as I would tolerate
+a poor lunatic. I would tolerate him as I would tolerate a
+conspirator. He may live and go free, hold his lands and enjoy his
+home&mdash;he may even vote; but for any higher or more advanced
+citizenship, he is, as I hold, utterly disqualified." These are the
+sentiments of the church to-day.</p>
+<p>Give the church a place in the Constitution, let her touch once
+more the sword of power, and the priceless fruit of all the ages
+will turn to ashes on the lips of men.</p>
+<p>In religious ideas and conceptions there has been for ages a
+slow and steady development At the bottom of the ladder (speaking
+of modern times) is Catholicism, and at the top is Science. The
+intermediate rounds of this ladder are occupied by the various
+sects, whose name is legion.</p>
+<p>But whatever may be the truth upon any subject has nothing to do
+with-our right to investigate that subject, and express any opinion
+we may form. All that I ask, is the same right I freely accord to
+all others.</p>
+<p>A few years ago a Methodist clergyman took it upon himself to
+give me a piece of friendly advice. "Although you may disbelieve
+the Bible," said he, "you ought not to say so. That, you should
+keep to yourself."</p>
+<p>"Do you believe the Bible," said I.</p>
+<p>He replied, "Most assuredly".</p>
+<p>To which I retorted, "Your answer conveys no information to me.
+You may be following your own advice. You told me to suppress my
+opinions. Of course a man who will advise others to dissimulate
+will not always be particular about telling the truth himself."</p>
+<p>There can be nothing more utterly subversive of all that is
+really valuable than the suppression of honest thought. No man,
+worthy of the form he bears, will at the command of church or state
+solemnly repeat a creed his reason scorns.</p>
+<p>It is the duty of each and every one to maintain his
+individuality. "This above all, to thine ownself be true, and it
+must follow as the night the day, thou canst not then be false to
+any man." It is a magnificent thing to be the sole proprietor of
+yourself. It is a terrible thing to wake up at night and say,
+"There is nobody in this bed." It is humiliating to know that your
+ideas are all borrowed; that you are indebted to your memory for
+your principles; that your religion is simply one of your habits,
+and that you would have convictions if they were only contagious.
+It is mortifying to feel that you belong to a mental mob and cry
+"crucify him," because the others do; that you reap what the great
+and brave have sown, and that you can benefit the world only by
+leaving it.</p>
+<p>Surely every human being ought to attain to the dignity of the
+unit. Surely it is worth something to be one, and to feel that the
+census of the universe would be incomplete without counting you.
+Surely there is grandeur in knowing that in the realm of thought,
+at least, you are without a chain; that you have the right to
+explore all heights and all depths; that there are no walls nor
+fences, nor prohibited places, nor sacred corners in all the vast
+expanse of thought; that your intellect owes no allegiance to any
+being, human or divine; that you hold all in fee and upon no
+condition and by no tenure whatever; that in the world of mind you
+are relieved from all personal dictation, and from the ignorant
+tyranny of majorities. Surely it is worth something to feel that
+there are no priests, no popes, no parties, no governments, no
+kings, no gods, to whom your intellect can be compelled to pay a
+reluctant homage. Surely it is a joy to know that all the cruel
+ingenuity of bigotry can devise no prison, no dungeon, no cell in
+which for one instant to confine a thought; that ideas cannot be
+dislocated by racks, nor crushed in iron boots, nor burned with
+fire. Surely it is sublime to think that the brain is a castle, and
+that within its curious bastions and winding halls the soul, in
+spite of all worlds and all beings, is the supreme sovereign of
+itself.</p>
+<a name="link0006"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>HERETICS AND HERESIES.</h2>
+<h3>Liberty, a Word without which all other Words are Vain.</h3>
+<p>WHOEVER has an opinion of his own, and honestly expresses it,
+will be guilty of heresy. Heresy is what the minority believe; it
+is the name given by the powerful to the doctrine of the weak. This
+word was born of the hatred, arrogance and cruelty of those who
+love their enemies, and who, when smitten on one cheek, turn the
+other. This word was born of intellectual slavery in the feudal
+ages of thought It was an epithet used in the place of argument.
+From the commencement of the Christian era, every art has been
+exhausted and every conceivable punishment inflicted to force all
+people to hold the same religious opinions. This effort was born of
+the idea that a certain belief was necessary to the salvation of
+the soul. Christ taught, and the church still teaches, that
+unbelief is the blackest of crimes. God is supposed to hate with an
+infinite and implacable hatred, every heretic upon the earth, and
+the heretics who have died are supposed at this moment to be
+suffering the agonies of the damned. The church persecutes the
+living and her God burns the dead.</p>
+<p>It is claimed that God wrote a book called the Bible, and it is
+generally admitted that this book is somewhat difficult to
+understand. As long as the church had all the copies of this book,
+and the people were not allowed to read it, there was comparatively
+little heresy in the world; but when it was printed and read,
+people began honestly to differ as to its meaning. A few were
+independent and brave enough to give the world their real thoughts,
+and for the extermination of these men the church used all her
+power. Protestants and Catholics vied with each other in the work
+of enslaving the human mind. For ages they were rivals in the
+infamous effort to rid the earth of honest people. They infested
+every country, every city, town, hamlet and family. They appealed
+to the worst passions of the human heart They sowed the seeds of
+discord and hatred in every land. Brother denounced brother, wives
+informed against their husbands, mothers accused their children,
+dungeons were crowded with the innocent; the flesh of the good and
+true rotted in the clasp of chains; the flames devoured the heroic,
+and in the name of the most merciful God, his children were
+exterminated with famine, sword, and fire. Over the wild waves of
+battle rose and fell the banner of Jesus Christ. For sixteen
+hundred years the robes of the church were red with innocent blood.
+The ingenuity of Christians was exhausted in devising punishment
+severe enough to be inflicted upon other Christians who honestly
+and sincerely differed with them upon any point whatever.</p>
+<p>Give any orthodox church the power, and to-day they would punish
+heresy with whip, and chain, and fire. As long as a church deems a
+certain belief essential to salvation, just so long it will kill
+and burn if it has the power. Why should the church pity a man whom
+her God hates? Why should she show mercy to a kind and noble
+heretic whom her God will burn in eternal fire? Why should a
+Christian be better than his God? It is impossible for the
+imagination to conceive of a greater atrocity than has been
+perpetrated by the church. Every nerve in the human body capable of
+pain has been sought out and touched by the church.</p>
+<p>Let it be remembered that all churches have persecuted heretics
+to the extent of their power. Toleration has increased only when
+and where the power of the church has diminished. From Augustine
+until now the spirit of the Christians has remained the same. There
+has been the same intolerance, the same undying hatred of all who
+think for themselves, and the same determination to crush out of
+the human brain all knowledge inconsistent with an ignorant
+creed.</p>
+<p>Every church pretends that it has a revelation from God, and
+that this revelation must be given to the people through the
+church; that the church acts through its priests, and that ordinary
+mortals must be content with a revelation&mdash;not from
+God&mdash;but from the church. Had the people submitted to this
+preposterous claim, of course there could have been but one church,
+and that church never could have advanced. It might have
+retrograded, because it is not necessary to think or investigate in
+order to forget. Without heresy there could have been no
+progress.</p>
+<p>The highest type of the orthodox Christian does not forget;
+neither does he learn. He neither advances nor recedes. He is a
+living fossil embedded in that rock called faith. He makes no
+effort to better his condition, because all his strength is
+exhausted in keeping other people from improving theirs. The
+supreme desire of his heart is to force all others to adopt his
+creed, and in order to accomplish this object he denounces free
+thinking as a crime, and this crime he calls heresy. When he had
+power, heresy was the most terrible and formidable of words. It
+meant confiscation, exile, imprisonment, torture, and death.</p>
+<p>In those days the cross and rack were inseparable companions.
+Across the open Bible lay the sword and fagot. Not content with
+burning such heretics as were alive, they even tried the dead, in
+order that the church might rob their wives and children. The
+property of all heretics was confiscated, and on this account they
+charged the dead with being heretical&mdash;indicted, as it were,
+their dust&mdash;to the end that the church might clutch the bread
+of orphans. Learned divines discussed the propriety of tearing out
+the tongues of heretics before they were burned, and the general
+opinion was, that this ought to be done so that the heretics should
+not be able, by uttering blasphemies, to shock the Christians who
+were burning them. With a mixture of ferocity and Christianity, the
+priests insisted that heretics ought to be burned at a slow fire,
+giving as a reason that more time was given them for
+repentance.</p>
+<p>No wonder that Jesus Christ said, "I came not to bring peace,
+but a sword."</p>
+<p>Every priest regarded himself as the agent of God. He answered
+all questions by authority, and to treat him with disrespect was an
+insult offered to God. No one was asked to think, but all were
+commanded to obey.</p>
+<p>In 1208 the Inquisition was established. Seven years afterward,
+the fourth council of the Lateran enjoined all kings and rulers to
+swear an oath that they would exterminate heretics from their
+dominions. The sword of the church was unsheathed, and the world
+was at the mercy of ignorant and infuriated priests, whose eyes
+feasted upon the agonies they inflicted. Acting, as they believed,
+or pretended to believe, under the command of God; stimulated by
+the hope of infinite reward in another world&mdash;hating heretics
+with every drop of their bestial blood; savage beyond description;
+merciless beyond conception,&mdash;these infamous priests, in a
+kind of frenzied joy, leaped upon the helpless victims of their
+rage. They crushed their bones in iron boots; tore their quivering
+flesh with iron hooks and pincers; cut off their lips and eyelids;
+pulled out their nails, and into the bleeding quick thrust needles;
+tore out their tongues; extinguished their eyes; stretched them
+upon racks; flayed them alive; crucified them with their heads
+downward; exposed them to wild beasts; burned them at the stake;
+mocked their cries and groans; ravished their wives; robbed their
+children, and then prayed God to finish the holy work in hell.</p>
+<p>Millions upon millions were sacrificed upon the altars of
+bigotry. The Catholic burned the Lutheran, the Lutheran burned the
+Catholic, the Episcopalian tortured the Presbyterian, the
+Presbyterian tortured the Episcopalian. Every denomination killed
+all it could of every other; and each Christian felt in duty bound
+to exterminate every other Christian who denied the smallest
+fraction of his creed.</p>
+<p>In the reign of Henry VIII.&mdash;that pious and moral founder
+of the apostolic Episcopal Church,&mdash;there was passed by the
+parliament of England an act entitled "An act for abolishing of
+diversity of opinion." And in this act was set forth what a good
+Christian was obliged to believe: First, That in the sacrament was
+the real body and blood of Jesus Christ.</p>
+<p>Second, That the body and blood of Jesus Christ was in the
+bread, and the blood and body of Jesus Christ was in the wine.</p>
+<p>Third, That priests should not marry.</p>
+<p>Fourth, That vows of chastity were of perpetual obligation.</p>
+<p>Fifth, That private masses ought to be continued; and,</p>
+<p>Sixth, That auricular confession to a priest must be
+maintained.</p>
+<p>This creed was made by law, in order that all men might know
+just what to believe by simply reading the statute. The church
+hated to see the people wearing out their brains in thinking upon
+these subjects. It was thought far better that a creed should be
+made by parliament, so that whatever might be lacking in evidence
+might be made up in force. The punishment for denying the first
+article was death by fire. For the denial of any other article,
+imprisonment, and for the second offence&mdash;death.</p>
+<p>Your attention is called to these six articles, established
+during the reign of Henry VIII., and by the Church of England,
+simply because not one of these articles is believed by that church
+to-day. If the law then made by the church could be enforced now,
+every Episcopalian would be burned at the stake.</p>
+<p>Similar laws were passed in most Christian countries, as all
+orthodox churches firmly believed that mankind could be legislated
+into heaven. According to the creed of every church, slavery leads
+to heaven, liberty leads to hell. It was claimed that God had
+founded the church, and that to deny the authority of the church
+was to be a traitor to God, and consequently an ally of the devil.
+To torture and destroy one of the soldiers of Satan was a duty no
+good Christian cared to neglect. Nothing can be sweeter than to
+earn the gratitude of God by killing your own enemies. Such a
+mingling of profit and revenge, of heaven for yourself and
+damnation for those you dislike, is a temptation that your ordinary
+Christian never resists.</p>
+<p>According to the theologians, God, the Father of us all, wrote a
+letter to his children. The children have always differed somewhat
+as to the meaning of this letter. In consequence of these honest
+differences, these brothers began to cut out each other's hearts.
+In every land, where this letter from God has been read, the
+children to whom and for whom it was written have been filled with
+hatred and malice. They have imprisoned and murdered each other,
+and the wives and children of each other. In the name of God every
+possible crime has been committed, every conceivable outrage has
+been perpetrated. Brave men, tender and loving women, beautiful
+girls, and prattling babes have been exterminated in the name of
+Jesus Christ. For more than fifty generations the church has
+carried the black flag. Her vengeance has been measured only by her
+power. During all these years of infamy no heretic has ever been
+forgiven. With the heart of a fiend she has hated; with the clutch
+of avarice she has grasped; with the jaws of a dragon she has
+devoured; pitiless as famine, merciless as fire, with the
+conscience of a serpent: such is the history of the Church of
+God.</p>
+<p>I do not say, and I do not believe, that Christians are as bad
+as their creeds. In spite of church and dogma, there have been
+millions and millions of men and women true to the loftiest and
+most generous promptings of the human heart. They have been true to
+their convictions, and, with a self-denial and fortitude excelled
+by none, have labored and suffered for the salvation of men. Imbued
+with the spirit of self-sacrifice, believing that by personal
+effort they could rescue at least a few souls from the infinite
+shadow of hell, they have cheerfully endured every hardship and
+scorned every danger. And yet, notwithstanding all this, they
+believed that honest error was a crime. They knew that the Bible so
+declared, and they believed that all unbelievers would be eternally
+lost. They believed that religion was of God, and all heresy of the
+devil. They killed heretics in defence of their own souls and the
+souls of their children. They killed them because, according to
+their idea, they were the enemies of God, and because the Bible
+teaches that the blood of the unbeliever is a most acceptable
+sacrifice to heaven.</p>
+<p>Nature never prompted a loving mother to throw her child into
+the Ganges. Nature never prompted men to exterminate each other for
+a difference of opinion concerning the baptism of infants. These
+crimes have been produced by religions filled with all that is
+illogical, cruel and hideous. These religions were produced for the
+most part by ignorance, tyranny and hypocrisy. Under the impression
+that the infinite ruler and creator of the universe had commanded
+the destruction of heretics and infidels, the church perpetrated
+all these crimes.</p>
+<p>Men and women have been burned for thinking there is but one
+God; that there was none; that the Holy Ghost is younger than God;
+that God was somewhat older than his son; for insisting that good
+works will save a man without faith; that faith will do without
+good works; for declaring that a sweet babe will not be burned
+eternally, because its parents failed to have its head wet by a
+priest; for speaking of God as though he had a nose; for denying
+that Christ was his own father; for contending that three persons,
+rightly added together, make more than one; for believing in
+purgatory; for denying the reality of hell; for pretending that
+priests can forgive sins; for preaching that God is an essence; for
+denying that witches rode through the air on sticks; for doubting
+the total depravity of the human heart; for laughing at
+irresistible grace, predestination and particular redemption; for
+denying that good bread could be made of the body of a dead man;
+for pretending that the pope was not managing this world for God,
+and in the place of God; for disputing the efficacy of a vicarious
+atonement; for thinking the Virgin Mary was born like other people;
+for thinking that a man's rib was hardly sufficient to make a
+good-sized woman; for denying that God used his finger for a pen;
+for asserting that prayers are not answered, that diseases are not
+sent to punish unbelief; for denying the authority of the Bible;
+for having a Bible in their possession; for attending mass, and for
+refusing to attend; for wearing a surplice; for carrying a cross,
+and for refusing; for being a Catholic, and for being a Protestant;
+for being an Episcopalian, a Presbyterian, a Baptist, and for being
+a Quaker. In short, every virtue has been a crime, and every crime
+a virtue. The church has burned honesty and rewarded hypocrisy. And
+all this, because it was commanded by a book&mdash;a book that men
+had been taught implicitly to believe, long, before they knew one
+word that was in it They had been taught that to doubt the truth of
+this book&mdash;to examine it, even&mdash;was a crime of such
+enormity that it could not be forgiven, either in this world or in
+the next The Bible was the real persecutor. The Bible burned
+heretics, built dungeons, founded the Inquisition, and trampled
+upon all the liberties of men.</p>
+<p>How long, O how long will mankind worship a book? How long will
+they grovel in the dust before the ignorant legends of the barbaric
+past? How long, O how long will they pursue phantoms in a darkness
+deeper than death?</p>
+<p>Unfortunately for the world, about the beginning of the
+sixteenth century, a man by the name of Gerard Chauvin was married
+to Jeanne Lefranc, and still more unfortunately for the world, the
+fruit of this marriage was a son, called John Chauvin, who
+afterwards became famous as John Calvin, the founder of the
+Presbyterian Church.</p>
+<p>This man forged five fetters for the brain. These fetters he
+called points. That is to say, predestination, particular
+redemption, total depravity, irresistible grace, and the
+perseverance of the saints. About the neck of each follower he put
+a collar bristling with these five iron points. The presence of all
+these points on the collar is still the test of orthodoxy in the
+church he founded. This man, when in the flush of youth, was
+elected to the office of preacher in Geneva. He at once, in union
+with Farel, drew up a condensed statement of the Presbyterian
+doctrine, and all the citizens of Geneva, on pain of banishment,
+were compelled to take an oath that they believed this statement.
+Of this proceeding Calvin very innocently remarked that it produced
+great satisfaction. A man named Caroli had the audacity to dispute
+with Calvin. For this outrage he was banished.</p>
+<p>To show you what great subjects occupied the attention of
+Calvin, it is only necessary to state that he furiously discussed
+the question as to whether the sacramental bread should be leavened
+or unleavened. He drew up laws regulating the cut of the citizens'
+clothes, and prescribing their diet, and all those whose garments
+were not in the Calvin fashion were refused the sacrament. At last,
+the people becoming tired of this petty theological tyranny,
+banished Calvin. In a few years, however, he was recalled and
+received with great enthusiasm. After this he was supreme, and the
+will of Calvin became the law of Geneva.</p>
+<p>Under his benign administration, James Gruet was beheaded
+because he had written some profane verses. The slightest word
+against Calvin or his absurd doctrines was punished as a crime.</p>
+<p>In 1553 a man was tried at Vienne by the Catholic Church for
+heresy. He was convicted and sentenced to death by burning. It was
+apparently his good fortune to escape. Pursued by the sleuth hounds
+of intolerance he fled to Geneva for protection. A dove flying from
+hawks, sought safety in the nest of a vulture. This fugitive from
+the cruelty of Rome asked shelter from John Calvin, who had written
+a book in favor of religious toleration. Servetus had forgotten
+that this book was written by Calvin when in the minority; that it
+was written in weakness to be forgotten in power; that it was
+produced by fear instead of principle. He did not know that Calvin
+had caused his arrest at Vienne, in France, and had sent a copy of
+his work, which was claimed to be blasphemous, to the archbishop.
+He did not then know that the Protestant Calvin was acting as one
+of the detectives of the Catholic Church, and had been instrumental
+in procuring his conviction for heresy. Ignorant of all this
+unspeakable infamy, he put himself in the power of this very
+Calvin. The maker of the Presbyterian creed caused the fugitive
+Serve-tus to be arrested for blasphemy. He was tried. Calvin was
+his accuser. He was convicted and condemned to death by fire. On
+the morning of the fatal day, Calvin saw him, and Servetus, the
+victim, asked forgiveness of Calvin, the murderer. Servetus was
+bound to the stake, and the fagots were lighted. The wind carried
+the flames somewhat away from his body, so that he slowly roasted
+for hours. Vainly he implored a speedy death. At last the flames
+climbed round his form; through smoke and fire his murderers saw a
+white heroic face. And there they watched until a man became a
+charred and shriveled mass.</p>
+<p>Liberty was banished from Geneva, and nothing but
+Presbyterianism was left. Honor, justice, mercy, reason and charity
+were all exiled, but the five points of predestination, particular
+redemption, irresistible grace, total depravity, and the certain
+perseverance of the saints remained instead.</p>
+<p>Calvin founded a little theocracy, modeled after the Old
+Testament, and succeeded in erecting the most detestable government
+that ever existed, except the one from which it was copied.</p>
+<p>Against all this intolerance, one man, a minister, raised his
+voice. The name of this man should never be forgotten. It was
+Castalio. This brave man had the goodness and the courage to
+declare the innocence of honest error. He was the first of the
+so-called reformers to take this noble ground. I wish I had the
+genius to pay a fitting tribute to his memory. Perhaps it would be
+impossible to pay him a grander compliment than to say, Castalio
+was in all things the opposite of Calvin. To plead for the right of
+individual judgment was considered a crime, and Castalio was driven
+from Geneva by John Calvin. By him he was denounced as a child of
+the devil, as a dog of Satan, as a beast from hell, and as one who,
+by this horrid blasphemy of the innocence of honest error,
+crucified Christ afresh, and by him he was pursued until rescued by
+the hand of death.</p>
+<p>Upon the name of Castalio, Calvin heaped every epithet, until
+his malice was nearly satisfied and his imagination entirely
+exhausted. It is impossible to conceive how human nature can become
+so frightfully perverted as to pursue a fellow-man with the
+malignity of a fiend, simply because he is good, just, and
+generous.</p>
+<p>Calvin was of a pallid, bloodless complexion, thin, sickly,
+irritable, gloomy, impatient, egotistic, tyrannical, heartless, and
+infamous. He was a strange compound of revengeful morality,
+malicious forgiveness, ferocious charity, egotistic humility, and a
+kind of hellish justice. In other words, he was as near like the
+God of the Old Testament as his health permitted.</p>
+<p>The best thing, however, about the Presbyterians of Geneva was,
+that they denied the power of the Pope, and the best thing about
+the Pope was, that he was not a Presbyterian.</p>
+<p>The doctrines of Calvin spread rapidly, and were eagerly
+accepted by multitudes on the continent; but Scotland, in a few
+years, became the real fortress of Presbyterianism. The Scotch
+succeeded in establishing the same kind of theocracy that
+flourished in Geneva. The clergy took possession and control of
+everybody and everything. It is impossible to exaggerate the mental
+degradation, the abject superstition of the people of Scotland
+during the reign of Presbyterianism. Heretics were hunted and
+devoured as though they had been wild beasts. The gloomy insanity
+of Presbyterianism took possession of a great majority of the
+people. They regarded their ministers as the Jews did Moses and
+Aaron. They believed that they were the especial agents of God, and
+that whatsoever they bound in Scotland would be bound in heaven.
+There was not one particle of intellectual freedom. No man was
+allowed to differ with the church, or to even contradict a priest.
+Had Presbyterianism maintained its ascendency, Scotland would have
+been peopled by savages to-day.</p>
+<p>The revengeful spirit of Calvin took possession of the Puritans,
+and caused them to redden the soil of the New World with the brave
+blood of honest men. Clinging to the five points of Calvin, they
+too established governments in accordance with the teachings of the
+Old Testament. They too attached the penalty of death to the
+expression of honest thought. They too believed their church
+supreme, and exerted all their power to curse this continent with a
+spiritual despotism as infamous as it was absurd. They believed
+with Luther that universal toleration is universal error, and
+universal error is universal hell. Toleration was denounced as a
+crime.</p>
+<p>Fortunately for us, civilization has had a softening effect even
+upon the Presbyterian Church. To the ennobling influence of the
+arts and sciences the savage spirit of Calvinism has, in some
+slight degree, succumbed. True, the old creed remains substantially
+as it was written, but by a kind of tacit understanding it has come
+to be regarded as a relic of the past. The cry of "heresy" has been
+growing fainter and fainter, and, as a consequence, the ministers
+of that denomination have ventured, now and then, to express doubts
+as to the damnation of infants, and the doctrine of total
+depravity. The fact is, the old ideas became a little monotonous to
+the people. The fall of man, the scheme of redemption and
+irresistible grace, began to have a familiar sound. The preachers
+told the old stories while the congregations slept Some of the
+ministers became tired of these stories themselves. The five points
+grew dull, and they felt that nothing short of irresistible grace
+could bear this endless repetition. The outside world was full of
+progress, and in every direction men advanced, while this church,
+anchored to a creed, idly rotted at the shore. Other denominations,
+imbued some little with the spirit of investigation, were springing
+up on every side, while the old Presbyterian ark rested on the
+Ararat of the past, filled with the theological monsters of another
+age.</p>
+<p>Lured by the splendors of the outer world, tempted by the
+achievements of science, longing to feel the throb and beat of the
+mighty march of the human race, a few of the ministers of this
+conservative denomination were compelled, by irresistible sense, to
+say a few words in harmony with the splendid ideas of to-day.</p>
+<p>These utterances have upon several occasions so nearly wakened
+some of the members that, rubbing their eyes, they have feebly
+inquired whether these grand ideas were not somewhat heretical.
+These ministers found that just in the proportion that their
+orthodoxy decreased, their congregations increased. Those who dealt
+in the pure unadulterated article found themselves demonstrating
+the five points to a less number of hearers than they had points.
+Stung to madness by this bitter truth, this galling contrast, this
+harassing fact, the really orthodox have raised the cry of heresy,
+and expect with this cry to seal the lips of honest men. One of the
+Presbyterian ministers, and one who has been enjoying the luxury of
+a little honest thought, and the real rapture of expressing it, has
+already been indicted, and is about to be tried by the Presbytery
+of Illinois. He is charged&mdash;</p>
+<p><i>First</i>. With having neglected to preach that most
+comforting and consoling truth, the eternal damnation of the
+soul.</p>
+<p>Surely, that man must be a monster who could wish to blot this
+blessed doctrine out and rob earth's wretched children of this
+blissful hope!</p>
+<p>Who can estimate the misery that has been caused by this most
+infamous doctrine of eternal punishment? Think of the lives it has
+blighted&mdash;of the tears it has caused&mdash;of the agony it has
+produced. Think of the millions who have been driven to insanity by
+this most terrible of dogmas. This doctrine renders God the basest
+and most cruel being in the universe. Compared with him, the most
+frightful deities of the most barbarous and degraded tribes are
+miracles of goodness and mercy. There is nothing more degrading
+than to worship such a god. Lower than this the soul can never
+sink. If the doctrine of eternal damnation is true, let me share
+the fate of the unconverted; let me have my portion in hell, rather
+than in heaven with a god infamous enough to inflict eternal misery
+upon any of the sons of men.</p>
+<p><i>Second</i>. With having spoken a few kind words of Robert
+Collyer and John Stuart Mill.</p>
+<p>I have the honor of a slight acquaintance with Robert Collyer. I
+have read with pleasure some of his exquisite productions. He has a
+brain full of the dawn, the head of a philosopher, the imagination
+of a poet and the sincere heart of a child.</p>
+<p>Is a minister to be silenced because he speaks fairly of a noble
+and candid adversary? Is it a crime to compliment a lover of
+justice, an advocate of liberty; one who devotes his life to the
+elevation of man, the discovery of truth, and the promulgation of
+what he believes to be right?</p>
+<p>Can that tongue be palsied by a presbytery that praises a
+self-denying and heroic life? Is it a sin to speak a charitable
+word over the grave of John Stuart Mill? Is it heretical to pay a
+just and graceful tribute to departed worth? Must the true
+Presbyterian violate the sanctity of the tomb, dig open the grave
+and ask his God to curse the silent dust? Is Presbyterianism so
+narrow that it conceives of no excellence, of no purity of
+intention, of no spiritual and moral grandeur outside of its
+barbaric creed? Does it still retain within its stony heart all the
+malice of its founder? Is it still warming its fleshless hands at
+the flames that consumed Servetus? Does it still glory in the
+damnation of infants, and does it still persist in emptying the
+cradle in order that perdition may be filled? Is it still starving
+the soul and famishing the heart? Is it still trembling and
+shivering, crouching and crawling before its ignorant Confession of
+Faith?</p>
+<p>Had such men as Robert Collyer and John Stuart Mill been present
+at the burning of Servetus, they would have extinguished the flames
+with their tears. Had the presbytery of Chicago been there, they
+would have quietly turned their backs, solemnly divided their coat
+tails, and warmed themselves.</p>
+<p><i>Third</i>. With having spoken disparagingly of the doctrine
+of predestination.</p>
+<p>If there is any dogma that ought to be protected by law,
+predestination is that doctrine. Surely it is a cheerful, joyous
+thing, to one who is laboring, struggling, and suffering in this
+weary world, to think that before he existed; before the earth was;
+before a star had glittered in the heavens; before a ray of light
+had left the quiver of the sun, his destiny had been irrevocably
+fixed, and that for an eternity before his birth he had been doomed
+to bear eternal pain.</p>
+<p><i>Fourth.</i> With failing to preach the efficacy of a
+"vicarious sacrifice."</p>
+<p>Suppose a man had been convicted of murder, and was about to be
+hanged&mdash;the governor acting as the executioner; and suppose
+that just as the doomed man was about to suffer death some one in
+the crowd should step forward and say, "I am willing to die in the
+place of that murderer. He has a family, and I have none." And
+suppose further, that the governor should reply, "Come forward,
+young man, your offer is accepted. A murder has been committed and
+somebody must be hung, and your death will satisfy the law just as
+well as the death of the murderer." What would you then think of
+the doctrine of "vicarious sacrifice"?</p>
+<p>This doctrine is the consummation of two
+outrages&mdash;forgiving one crime and committing another.</p>
+<p><i>Fifth</i>. With having inculcated a phase of the doctrine
+commonly known as "evolution," or "development".</p>
+<p>The church believes and teaches the exact opposite of this
+doctrine. According to the philosophy of theology, man has
+continued to degenerate for six thousand years. To teach that there
+is that in nature which impels to higher forms and grander ends, is
+heresy, of course. The Deity will damn Spencer and his "Evolution,"
+Darwin and his "Origin of Species," Bastian and his "Spontaneous
+Generation," Huxley and his "Protoplasm," Tyndall and his "Prayer
+Gauge," and will save those, and those only, who declare that the
+universe has been cursed, from the smallest atom to the grandest
+star; that everything tends to evil and to that only, and that the
+only perfect thing in nature is the Presbyterian Confession of
+Faith.</p>
+<p><i>Sixth</i>. With having intimated that the reception of
+Socrates and Penelope at heaven's gate was, to say the least, a
+trifle more cordial than that of Catharine II.</p>
+<p>Penelope, waiting patiently and trustfully for her lord's
+return, delaying her suitors, while sadly weaving and unweaving the
+shroud of Laertes, is the most perfect type of wife and woman
+produced by the civilization of Greece.</p>
+<p>Socrates, whose life was above reproach and whose death was
+beyond all praise, stands to-day, in the estimation of every
+thoughtful man, at least the peer of Christ.</p>
+<p>Catharine II. assassinated her husband. Stepping upon his
+corpse, she mounted the throne. She was the murderess of Prince
+Iwan, grand nephew of Peter the Great, who was imprisoned for
+eighteen years, and who during all that time saw the sky but once.
+Taken all in all, Catharine was probably one of the most
+intellectual beasts that ever wore a crown.</p>
+<p>Catharine, however, was the head of the Greek Church, Socrates
+was a heretic and Penelope lived and died without having once heard
+of "particular redemption" or of "irresistible grace."</p>
+<p><i>Seventh</i>. With repudiating the idea of a "call" to the
+ministry, and pretending that men were "called" to preach as they
+were to the other avocations of life.</p>
+<p>If this doctrine is true, God, to say the least of it, is an
+exceedingly poor judge of human nature. It is more than a century
+since a man of true genius has been found in an orthodox pulpit.
+Every minister is heretical just to the extent that intellect is
+above the average. The Lord seems to be satisfied with mediocrity;
+but the people are not.</p>
+<p>An old deacon, wishing to get rid of an unpopular preacher,
+advised him to give up the ministry and turn his attention to
+something else. The preacher replied that he could not
+conscientiously desert the pulpit, as he had had a "call" to the
+ministry. To which the deacon replied, "That may be so, but it's
+very unfortunate for you, that when God called you to preach, he
+forgot to call anybody to hear you."</p>
+<p>There is nothing more stupidly egotistic than the claim of the
+clergy that they are, in some divine sense set apart to the service
+of the Lord; that they have been chosen, and sanctified; that there
+is an infinite difference between them and persons employed in
+secular affairs. They teach us that all other professions must take
+care of themselves; that God allows anybody to be a doctor, a
+lawyer, statesman, soldier, or artist; that the Motts and
+Coopers&mdash;the Mansfields and Marshalls&mdash;the Wilberforces
+and Sumners&mdash;the Angelos and Raphaels, were never honored by a
+"call." They chose their professions and won their laurels without
+the assistance of the Lord. All these men were left free to follow
+their own inclinations, while God was busily engaged selecting and
+"calling" priests, rectors, elders, ministers and exhorters.</p>
+<p><i>Eighth</i>. With having doubted that God was the author of
+the 109th Psalm.</p>
+<p>The portion of that psalm which carries with it the clearest and
+most satisfactory evidences of inspiration, and which has afforded
+almost unspeakable consolation to the Presbyterian Church, is as
+follows:</p>
+<p>Set thou a wicked man over him; and let Satan stand at his right
+hand.</p>
+<p>When he shall be judged, let him be condemned; and let his
+prayer become sin.</p>
+<p>Let his days be few; and let another take his office.</p>
+<p>Let his children be fatherless and his wife a widow.</p>
+<p>Let his children be continually vagabonds, and beg; let them
+seek their bread also out of their desolate places.</p>
+<p>Let the extortioner catch all that he hath; and let the stranger
+spoil his labor.</p>
+<p>Let there be none to extend mercy unto him; neither let there be
+any to favor his fatherless children.</p>
+<p>Let his posterity be cut off: and in the generation following
+let their name be blotted out.</p>
+<p>But do thou for me, O God the Lord, for Thy name's sake; because
+Thy mercy is good, deliver Thou me.... I will greatly praise the
+Lord with my <i>mouth</i>.</p>
+<p>Think of a God wicked and malicious enough to inspire this
+prayer. Think of one infamous enough to answer it.</p>
+<p>Had this inspired psalm been found in some temple erected for
+the worship of snakes, or in the possession of some cannibal king,
+written with blood upon the dried skins of babes, there would have
+been a perfect harmony between its surroundings and its
+sentiments.</p>
+<p>No wonder that the author of this inspired psalm coldly received
+Socrates and Penelope, and reserved his sweetest smiles for
+Catharine the Second.</p>
+<p><i>Ninth.</i> With having said that the battles in which the
+Israelites engaged, with the approval and command of Jehovah,
+surpassed in cruelty those of Julius C&aelig;sar.</p>
+<p>Was it Julius C&aelig;sar who said, "And the Lord our God
+delivered him before us; and we smote him, and his sons, and all
+his people. And we took all his cities, and utterly destroyed the
+men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left
+none to remain"?</p>
+<p>Did Julius C&aelig;sar send the following report to the Roman
+senate? "And we took all his cities at that time, there was not a
+city which we took not from them, three-score cities, all the
+region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan. All these cities were
+fenced with high walls, gates, and bars; beside unwalled towns a
+great many. And we utterly destroyed them, as we did unto Sihon,
+king of Heshbon, utterly destroying the men, women, and children of
+every city."</p>
+<p>Did C&aelig;sar take the city of Jericho "and utterly destroy
+all that was in the city, both men and women, young and old"? Did
+he smite "all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of
+the vale, and of the springs, and all their kings, and leave none
+remaining that breathed, as the Lord God had commanded"?</p>
+<p>Search the records of the whole world, find out the history of
+every barbarous tribe, and you can find no crime that touched a
+lower depth of infamy than those the Bible's God commanded and
+approved. For such a God I have no words to express my loathing and
+contempt, and all the words in all the languages of man would
+scarcely be sufficient. Away with such a God! Give me Jupiter
+rather, with Io and Europa, or even Siva with his skulls and
+snakes.</p>
+<p><i>Tenth</i>. With having repudiated the doctrine of "total
+depravity."</p>
+<p>What a precious doctrine is that of the total depravity of the
+human heart! How sweet it is to believe that the lives of all the
+good and great were continual sins and perpetual crimes; that the
+love a mother bears her child is, in the sight of God, a sin; that
+the gratitude of the natural heart is simple meanness; that the
+tears of pity are impure; that for the unconverted to live and
+labor for others is an offence to heaven; that the noblest
+aspirations of the soul are low and groveling in the sight of God;
+that man should fall upon his knees and ask forgiveness, simply for
+loving his wife and child, and that even the act of asking
+forgiveness is in fact a crime!</p>
+<p>Surely it is a kind of bliss to feel that every woman and child
+in the wide world, with the exception of those who believe the five
+points, or some other equally cruel creed, and such children as
+have been baptized, ought at this very moment to be dashed down to
+the lowest glowing gulf of hell.</p>
+<p>Take from the Christian the history of his own
+church&mdash;leave that entirely out of the question&mdash;and he
+has no argument left with which to substantiate the total depravity
+of man.</p>
+<p><i>Eleventh</i>. With having doubted the "perseverance of the
+saints."</p>
+<p>I suppose the real meaning of this doctrine is, that
+Presbyterians are just as sure of going to heaven as all other
+folks are of going to hell. The real idea being, that it all
+depends upon the will of God, and not upon the character of the
+person to be damned or saved; that God has the weakness to send
+Presbyterians to Paradise, and the justice to doom the rest of
+mankind to eternal fire.</p>
+<p>It is admitted that no unconverted brain can see the least
+particle of sense in this doctrine; that it is abhorrent to all who
+have not been the recipients of a "new heart;" that only the
+perfectly good can justify the perfectly infamous.</p>
+<p>It is contended that the saints do not persevere of their own
+free will&mdash;that they are entitled to no credit for
+persevering; but that God forces them to persevere, while on the
+other hand, every crime is committed in accordance with the secret
+will of God, who does all things for his own glory.</p>
+<p>Compared with this doctrine, there is no other idea, that has
+ever been believed by man, that can properly be called absurd.</p>
+<p><i>Twelfth</i>. With having spoken and written somewhat lightly
+of the idea of converting the heathen with doctrinal sermons.</p>
+<p>Of all the failures of which we have any history or knowledge,
+the missionary effort is the most conspicuous. The whole question
+has been decided here, in our own country, and conclusively
+settled. We have nearly exterminated the Indians, but we have
+converted none. From the days of John Eliot to the execution of the
+last Modoc, not one Indian has been the subject of irresistible
+grace or particular redemption. The few red men who roam the
+western wilderness have no thought or care concerning the five
+points of Calvin. They are utterly oblivious to the great and vital
+truths contained in the Thirty-nine Articles, the Saybrook
+platform, and the resolutions of the Evangelical Alliance. No
+Indian has ever scalped another on account of his religious belief.
+This of itself shows conclusively that the missionaries have had no
+effect Why should we convert the heathen of China and kill our own?
+Why should we send missionaries across the seas, and soldiers over
+the plains? Why should we send Bibles to the east and muskets to
+the west? If it is impossible to convert Indians who have no
+religion of their own; no prejudice for or against the "eternal
+procession of the Holy Ghost," how can we expect to convert a
+heathen who has a religion; who has plenty of gods and Bibles and
+prophets and Christs, and who has a religious literature far
+grander than our own? Can we hope with the story of Daniel in the
+lions' den to rival the stupendous miracles of India? Is there
+anything in our Bible as lofty and loving as the prayer of the
+Buddhist? Compare your "Confession of Faith" with the following:
+"Never will I seek nor receive private individual
+salvation&mdash;never enter into final peace alone; but forever and
+everywhere will I live and strive for the universal redemption of
+every creature throughout all worlds. Until all are delivered,
+never will I leave the world of sin, sorrow, and struggle, but will
+remain where I am."</p>
+<p>Think of sending an average Presbyterian to convert a man who
+daily offers this tender, this infinitely generous, this
+incomparable prayer. Think of reading the 109th Psalm to a heathen
+who has a Bible of his own in which is found this passage: "Blessed
+is that man and beloved of all the gods, who is afraid of no man,
+and of whom no man is afraid."</p>
+<p>Why should you read even the New Testament to a Hindu, when his
+own Chrishna has said, "If a man strike thee, and in striking drop
+his staff, pick it up and hand it to him again"? Why send a
+Presbyterian to a Sufi, who says, "Better one moment of silent
+contemplation and inward love, than seventy thousand years of
+outward worship"? "Whoso would carelessly tread one worm that
+crawls on earth, that heartless one is darkly alienate from God;
+but he that, living, embraceth all things in his love, to live with
+him God bursts all bounds above, below." Why should we endeavor to
+thrust our cruel and heartless theology upon one who prays this
+prayer: "O God, show pity toward the wicked; for on the good thou
+hast already bestowed thy mercy by having created them
+virtuous"?</p>
+<p>Compare this prayer with the curses and cruelties of the Old
+Testament&mdash;with the infamies commanded and approved by the
+being whom we are taught to worship as a God&mdash;and with the
+following tender product of Presbyterianism: "It may seem absurd to
+human wisdom that God should harden, blind, and deliver up some men
+to a reprobate sense; that he should first deliver them over to
+evil, and then condemn them for that evil; but the believing
+spiritual man sees no absurdity in all this, knowing that God would
+be never a whit less good even though he should destroy all
+men."</p>
+<p>Of all the religions that have been produced by the egotism, the
+malice, the ignorance and ambition of man, Presbyterianism is the
+most hideous.</p>
+<p>But what shall I say more, for the time would fail me to tell of
+Sabellianism, of a "Modal Trinity," and the "Eternal Procession of
+the Holy Ghost"?</p>
+<p>Upon these charges, a minister is to be tried, here in Chicago;
+in this city of pluck and progress&mdash;this marvel of
+energy&mdash;this miracle of nerve. The cry of "heresy," here,
+sounds like a wail from the Dark Ages&mdash;a shriek from the
+Inquisition, or a groan from the grave of Calvin.</p>
+<p>Another effort is being made to enslave a man.</p>
+<p>It is claimed that every member of the church has solemnly
+agreed never to outgrow the creed; that he has pledged himself to
+remain an intellectual dwarf. Upon this condition the church agrees
+to save his soul, and he hands over his brains to bind the bargain.
+Should a fact be found inconsistent with the creed, he binds
+himself to deny the fact and curse the finder. With scraps of
+dogmas and crumbs of doctrine, he agrees that his soul shall be
+satisfied forever. What an intellectual feast the Confession of
+Faith must be! It reminds one of the dinner described by Sydney
+Smith, where everything was cold except the water, and everything
+sour except the vinegar.</p>
+<p>Every member of a church promises to remain orthodox, that is to
+say&mdash;stationary. Growth is heresy. Orthodox ideas are the
+feathers that have been moulted by the eagle of progress. They are
+the dead leaves under the majestic palm, while heresy is the bud
+and blossom at the top.</p>
+<p>Imagine a vine that grows at one end and decays at the other.
+The end that grows is heresy, the end that rots is orthodox The
+dead are orthodox, and your cemetery is the most perfect type of a
+well regulated church. No thought, no progress, no heresy there.
+Slowly and silently, side by side, the satisfied members peacefully
+decay. There is only this difference&mdash;the dead do not
+persecute.</p>
+<p>And what does a trial for heresy mean? It means that the church
+says to a heretic, "Believe as I do, or I will withdraw my support.
+I will not employ you. I will pursue you until your garments are
+rags; until your children cry for bread; until your cheeks are
+furrowed with tears. I will hunt you to the very portals of the
+tomb, and then my God will do the rest I will not imprison you. I
+will not burn you. The law prevents my doing that. I helped make
+the law, not however to protect you, nor to deprive me of the right
+to exterminate you but in order to keep other churches from
+exterminating me." A trial for heresy means that the spirit of
+persecution still lingers in the church; that it still denies the
+right of private judgment; that it still thinks more of creed than
+truth, and that it is still determined to prevent the intellectual
+growth of man. It means that churches are shambles in which are
+bought and sold the souls of men. It means that the church is still
+guilty of the barbarity of opposing thought with force. It means
+that if it had the power, the mental horizon would be bounded by a
+creed; that it would bring again the whips and chains and dungeon
+keys, the rack and fagot of the past.</p>
+<p>But let me tell the church it lacks the power. There have been,
+and still are, too many men who own themselves&mdash;too much
+thought, too much knowledge for the church to grasp again the sword
+of power. The church must abdicate. For the Eglon of superstition
+Science has a message from Truth.</p>
+<p>The heretics have not thought and suffered and died in vain.
+Every heretic has been, and is, a ray of light. Not in vain did
+Voltaire, that great man, point from the foot of the Alps the
+finger of scorn at every hypocrite in Europe. Not in vain were the
+splendid utterances of the infidels, while beyond all price are the
+discoveries of science.</p>
+<p>The church has impeded, but it has not and it cannot stop the
+onward march of the human race. Heresy cannot be burned, nor
+imprisoned, nor starved. It laughs at presbyteries and synods, at
+ecumenical councils and the impotent thunders of Sinai. Heresy is
+the eternal dawn, the morning star, the glittering herald of the
+day. Heresy is the last and best thought. It is the perpetual New
+World, the unknown sea, toward which the brave all sail. It is the
+eternal horizon of progress.</p>
+<p>Heresy extends the hospitalities of the brain to a new
+thought.</p>
+<p>Heresy is a cradle; orthodoxy, a coffin.</p>
+<p>Why should man be afraid to think, and why should he fear to
+express his thoughts?</p>
+<p>Is it possible that an infinite Deity is unwilling that a man
+should investigate the phenomena by which he is surrounded? Is it
+possible that a god delights in threatening and terrifying men?
+What glory, what honor and renown a god must win on such a field!
+The ocean raving at a drop; a star envious of a candle; the sun
+jealous of a fire-fly.</p>
+<p>Go on, presbyteries and synods, go on! Thrust the heretics out
+of the church&mdash;that is to say, throw away your
+brains,&mdash;put out your eyes. The infidels will thank you. They
+are willing to adopt your exiles. Every deserter from your camp is
+a recruit for the army of progress. Cling to the ignorant dogmas of
+the past; read the 109th Psalm; gloat over the slaughter of mothers
+and babes; thank God for total depravity; shower your honors upon
+hypocrites, and silence every minister who is touched with that
+heresy called genius.</p>
+<p>Be true to your history. Turn out the astronomers, the
+geologists, the naturalists, the chemists, and all the honest
+scientists. With a whip of scorpions, drive them all out. We want
+them all. Keep the ignorant, the superstitious, the bigoted, and
+the writers of charges and specifications.</p>
+<p>Keep them, and keep them all. Repeat your pious platitudes in
+the drowsy ears of the faithful, and read your Bible to heretics,
+as kings read some forgotten riot-act to stop and stay the waves of
+revolution. You are too weak to excite anger. We forgive your
+efforts as the sun forgives a cloud&mdash;as the air forgives the
+breath you waste.</p>
+<p>How long, O how long, will man listen to the threats of God, and
+shut his eyes to the splendid possibilities of Nature? How long, O
+how long will man remain the cringing slave of a false and cruel
+creed?</p>
+<p>By this time the whole world should know that the real Bible has
+not yet been written, but is being written, and that it will never
+be finished until the race begins its downward march, or ceases to
+exist.</p>
+<p>The real Bible is not the work of inspired men, nor prophets,
+nor apostles, nor evangelists, nor of Christs. Every man who finds
+a fact, adds, as it were, a word to this great book. It is not
+attested by prophecy, by miracles or signs. It makes no appeal to
+faith, to ignorance, to credulity or fear. It has no punishment for
+unbelief, and no reward for hypocrisy. It appeals to man in the
+name of demonstration. It has nothing to conceal. It has no fear of
+being read, of being contradicted, of being investigated and
+understood. It does not pretend to be holy, or sacred; it simply
+claims to be true. It challenges the scrutiny of all, and implores
+every reader to verify every line for himself. It is incapable of
+being blasphemed. This book appeals to all the surroundings of man.
+Each thing that exists testifies of its perfection. The earth, with
+its heart of fire and crowns of snow; with its forests and plains,
+its rocks and seas; with its every wave and cloud; with its every
+leaf and bud and flower, confirms its every word, and the solemn
+stars, shining in the infinite abysses, are the eternal witnesses
+of its truth.</p>
+<a name="link0007"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>THE GHOSTS.</h2>
+<pre>
+ TO
+ EBON C. INGERSOLL,
+ MY BROTHER,
+ FROM WHOSE LIPS I HEARD THE FIRST APPLAUSE,
+ AND WITH WHOSE NAME I WISH MY OWN
+ ASSOCIATED UNTIL BOTH ARE FORGOTTEN,
+ THIS VOLUME IS DEDICATED.
+</pre>
+
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>PREFACE</h2>
+<p>These lectures have been so maimed and mutilated by orthodox
+malice; have been made to appear so halt, crutched and decrepit by
+those who mistake the pleasures of calumny for the duties of
+religion, that in simple justice to myself I concluded to publish
+them.</p>
+<p>Most of the clergy are, or seem to be, utterly incapable of
+discussing anything in a fair and catholic spirit. They appeal, not
+to reason, but to prejudice; not to facts, but to passages of
+Scripture. They can conceive of no goodness, of no spiritual
+exaltation beyond the horizon of their creed. Whoever differs with
+them upon what they are pleased to call "fundamental truths," is,
+in their opinion, a base and infamous man. To re-enact the
+tragedies of the sixteenth century, they lack only the power.
+Bigotry in all ages has been the same. Christianity simply
+transferred the brutality of the Colosseum to the Inquisition. For
+the murderous combat of the gladiators, the saints substituted the
+<i>auto de fe</i>. What has been called religion is, after all, but
+the organization of the wild beast in man. The perfumed blossom of
+arrogance is heaven. Hell is the consummation of revenge.</p>
+<p>The chief business of the clergy has always been to destroy the
+joy of life, and multiply and magnify the terrors and tortures of
+death and perdition. They have polluted the heart and paralyzed the
+brain; and upon the ignorant altars of the Past and the Dead, they
+have endeavored to sacrifice the Present and the Living.</p>
+<p>Nothing can exceed the mendacity of the religious press. I have
+had some little experience with political editors, and am forced to
+say, that until I read the religious papers, I did not know what
+malicious and slimy falsehoods could be constructed from ordinary
+words. The ingenuity with which the real and apparent meaning can
+be tortured out of language, is simply amazing. The average
+religious editor is intolerant and insolent; he knows nothing of
+affairs; he has the envy of failure, the malice of impotence, and
+always accounts for the brave and generous actions of unbelievers,
+by low, base and unworthy motives.</p>
+<p>By this time, even the clergy should know that the intellect of
+the nineteenth century needs no guardian. They should cease to
+regard themselves as shepherds defending flocks of weak, silly and
+fearful sheep from the claws and teeth of ravening wolves. By this
+time they should know that the religion of the ignorant and brutal
+Past no longer satisfies the heart and brain; that the miracles
+have become contemptible; that the "evidences" have ceased to
+convince; that the spirit of investigation cannot be stopped nor
+stayed; that the church is losing her power; that the young are
+holding in a kind of tender contempt the sacred follies of the old;
+that the pulpit and pews no longer represent the culture and
+morality of the world, and that the brand of intellectual
+inferiority is upon the orthodox brain.</p>
+<p>Men should be liberated from the aristocracy of the air. Every
+chain of superstition should be broken. The rights of men and women
+should be equal and sacred&mdash;marriage should be a perfect
+partnership&mdash;children should be governed by
+kindness,&mdash;every family should be a republic&mdash;every
+fireside a democracy.</p>
+<p>It seems almost impossible for religious people to really grasp
+the idea of intellectual freedom. They seem to think that man is
+responsible for his honest thoughts; that unbelief is a crime; that
+investigation is sinful; that credulity is a virtue, and that
+reason is a dangerous guide. They cannot divest themselves of the
+idea that in the realm of thought there must be
+government&mdash;authority and obedience&mdash;laws and
+penalties&mdash;rewards and punishments, and that somewhere in the
+universe there is a penitentiary for the soul.</p>
+<p>In the republic of mind, <i>one</i> is a majority. There, all
+are monarchs, and all are equals. The tyranny of a majority even is
+unknown. Each one is crowned, sceptered and throned. Upon every
+brow is the tiara, and around every form is the imperial purple.
+Only those are good citizens who express their honest thoughts, and
+those who persecute for opinion's sake, are the only traitors.
+There, nothing is considered infamous except an appeal to brute
+force, and nothing sacred but love, liberty, and joy. The church
+contemplates this republic with a sneer. From the teeth of hatred
+she draws back the lips of scorn. She is filled with the spite and
+spleen born of intellectual weakness. Once she was egotistic; now
+she is envious.</p>
+<p>Once she wore upon her hollow breast false gems, supposing them
+to be real. They have been shown to be false, but she wears them
+still. She has the malice of the caught, the hatred of the
+exposed.</p>
+<p>We are told to investigate the Bible for ourselves, and at the
+same time informed that if we come to the conclusion that it is not
+the inspired word of God, we will most assuredly be damned. Under
+such circumstances, if we believe this, investigation is
+impossible. Whoever is held responsible for his conclusions cannot
+weigh the evidence with impartial scales. Fear stands at the
+balance, and gives to falsehood the weight of its trembling
+hand.</p>
+<p>I oppose the church because she is the enemy of liberty; because
+her dogmas are infamous and cruel; because she humiliates and
+degrades woman; because she teaches the doctrines of eternal
+torment and the natural depravity of man; because she insists upon
+the absurd, the impossible, and the senseless; because she resorts
+to falsehood and slander; because she is arrogant and revengeful;
+because she allows men to sin on a credit; because she discourages
+self-reliance, and laughs at good works; because she believes in
+vicarious virtue and vicarious vice&mdash;vicarious punishment and
+vicarious reward; because she regards repentance of more importance
+than restitution, and because she sacrifices the world we have to
+one we know not of.</p>
+<p>The free and generous, the tender and affectionate, will
+understand me. Those who have escaped from the grated cells of a
+creed will appreciate my motives. The sad and suffering wives, the
+trembling and loving children will thank me: This is enough.</p>
+<p>Robert G. Ingersoll.</p>
+<p>Washington, D. C.,</p>
+<p>April 13, 1878.</p>
+<center>THE GHOSTS,</center>
+<p>LET THEM COVER THEIR EYELESS SOCKETS WITH THEIR FLESHLESS HANDS
+AND FADE FOREVER FROM THE IMAGINATION OF MEN.</p>
+<p>HERE are three theories by which men account for all phenomena,
+for everything that happens: First, the Supernatural; Second, the
+Supernatural and Natural; Third, the Natural. Between these
+theories there has been, from the dawn of civilization, a continual
+conflict. In this great war, nearly all the soldiers have been in
+the ranks of the supernatural. The believers in the supernatural
+insist that matter is controlled and directed entirely by powers
+from without; while naturalists maintain that Nature acts from
+within; that Nature is not acted upon; that the universe is all
+there is; that Nature with infinite arms embraces everything that
+exists, and that all supposed powers beyond the limits of the
+material are simply ghosts. You say, "Oh, this is materialism!"
+What is matter? I take in my hand some earth:&mdash;in this dust
+put seeds. Let the arrows of light from the quiver of the sun smite
+upon it; let the rain fall upon it. The seeds will grow and a plant
+will bud and blossom. Do you understand this? Can you explain it
+better than you can the production of thought? Have you the
+slightest conception of what it really is? And yet you speak of
+matter as though acquainted with its origin, as though you had torn
+from the clenched hands of the rocks the secrets of material
+existence. Do you know what force is? Can you account for molecular
+action? Are you really familiar with chemistry, and can you account
+for the loves and hatreds of the atoms? Is there not something in
+matter that forever eludes? After all, can you get beyond, above or
+below appearances? Before you cry "materialism!" had you not better
+ascertain what matter really is? Can you think even of anything
+without a material basis? Is it possible to imagine the
+annihilation of a single atom? Is it possible for you to conceive
+of the creation of an atom? Can you have a thought that was not
+suggested to you by what you call matter?</p>
+<p>Our fathers denounced materialism, and accounted for all
+phenomena by the caprice of gods and devils.</p>
+<p>For thousands of years it was believed that ghosts, good and
+bad, benevolent and malignant, weak and powerful, in some
+mysterious way, produced all phenomena; that disease and health,
+happiness and misery, fortune and misfortune, peace and war, life
+and death, success and failure, were but arrows from the quivers of
+these ghosts; that shadowy phantoms rewarded and punished mankind;
+that they were pleased and displeased by the actions of men; that
+they sent and withheld the snow, the light, and the rain; that they
+blessed the earth with harvests or cursed it with famine; that they
+fed or starved the children of men; that they crowned and uncrowned
+kings; that they took sides in war; that they controlled the winds;
+that they gave prosperous voyages, allowing the brave mariner to
+meet his wife and child inside the harbor bar, or sent the storms,
+strewing the sad shores with wrecks of ships and the bodies of
+men.</p>
+<p>Formerly, these ghosts were believed to be almost innumerable.
+Earth, air, and water were filled with these phantom hosts. In
+modern times they have greatly decreased in number, because the
+second theory,&mdash;a mingling of the supernatural and
+natural,&mdash;has generally been adopted. The remaining ghosts,
+however, are supposed to perform the same offices as the hosts of
+yore.</p>
+<p>It has always been believed that these ghosts could in some way
+be appeased; that they could be flattered by sacrifices, by prayer,
+by fasting, by the building of temples and cathedrals, by the blood
+of men and beasts, by forms and ceremonies, by chants, by kneelings
+and prostrations, by flagellations and maimings, by renouncing the
+joys of home, by living alone in the wide desert, by the practice
+of celibacy, by inventing instruments of torture, by destroying
+men, women and children, by covering the earth with dungeons, by
+burning unbelievers, by putting chains upon the thoughts and
+manacles upon the limbs of men, by believing things without
+evidence and against evidence, by disbelieving and denying
+demonstration, by despising facts, by hating reason, by denouncing
+liberty, by maligning heretics, by slandering the dead, by
+subscribing to senseless and cruel creeds, by discouraging
+investigation, by worshiping a book, by the cultivation of
+credulity, by observing certain times and days, by counting beads,
+by gazing at crosses, by hiring others to repeat verses and
+prayers, by burning candles and ringing bells, by enslaving each
+other and putting out the eyes of the soul. All this has been done
+to appease and flatter these monsters of the air.</p>
+<p>In the history of our poor world, no horror has been omitted, no
+infamy has been left undone by the believers in ghosts,&mdash;by
+the worshipers of these fleshless phantoms. And yet these shadows
+were born of cowardice and malignity. They were painted by the
+pencil of fear upon the canvas of ignorance by that artist called
+superstition.</p>
+<p>From these ghosts, our fathers received information. They were
+the schoolmasters of our ancestors. They were the scientists and
+philosophers, the geologists, legislators, astronomers, physicians,
+metaphysicians and historians of the past. For ages these ghosts
+were supposed to be the only source of real knowledge. They
+inspired men to write books, and the books were considered sacred.
+If facts were found to be inconsistent with these books, so much
+the worse for the facts, and especially for their discoverers. It
+was then, and still is, believed that these books are the basis of
+the idea of immortality; that to give up these volumes, or rather
+the idea that they are inspired, is to renounce the idea of
+immortality. This I deny.</p>
+<p>The idea of immortality, that like a sea has ebbed and flowed in
+the human heart, with its countless waves of hope and fear, beating
+against the shores and rocks of time and fate, was not born of any
+book, nor of any creed, nor of any religion. It was born of human
+affection, and it will continue to ebb and flow beneath the mists
+and clouds of doubt and darkness as long as love kisses the lips of
+death. It is the rainbow&mdash;Hope shining upon the tears of
+grief.</p>
+<p>From the books written by the ghosts we have at last ascertained
+that they knew nothing about the world in which we live. Did they
+know anything about the next? Upon every point where contradiction
+is possible, they have been contradicted.</p>
+<p>By these ghosts, by these citizens of the air, the affairs of
+government were administered; all authority to govern came from
+them. The emperors, kings and potentates all had commissions from
+these phantoms. Man was not considered as the source of any power
+whatever. To rebel against the king was to rebel against the
+ghosts, and nothing less than the blood of the offender could
+appease the invisible phantom or the visible tyrant. Kneeling was
+the proper position to be assumed by the multitude. The prostrate
+were the good. Those who stood erect were infidels and traitors. In
+the name and by the authority of the ghosts, man was enslaved,
+crushed, and plundered. The many toiled wearily in the storm and
+sun that the few favorites of the ghosts might live in idleness.
+The many lived in huts, and caves, and dens, that the few might
+dwell in palaces. The many covered themselves with rags, that the
+few might robe themselves in purple and in gold. The many crept,
+and cringed, and crawled, that the few might tread upon their flesh
+with iron feet.</p>
+<p>From the ghosts men received, not only authority, but
+information of every kind. They told us the form of this earth.
+They informed us that eclipses were caused by the sins of man; that
+the universe was made in six days; that astronomy, and geology were
+devices of wicked men, instigated by wicked ghosts; that gazing at
+the sky with a telescope was a dangerous thing; that digging into
+the earth was sinful curiosity; that trying to be wise above what
+they had written was born of a rebellious and irreverent
+spirit.</p>
+<p>They told us there was no virtue like belief, and no crime like
+doubt; that investigation was pure impudence, and the punishment
+therefor, eternal torment. They not only told us all about this
+world, but about two others; and if their statements about the
+other worlds are as true as about this, no one can estimate the
+value of their information.</p>
+<p>For countless ages the world was governed by ghosts, and they
+spared no pains to change the eagle of the human intellect into a
+bat of darkness. To accomplish this infamous purpose; to drive the
+love of truth from the human heart; to prevent the advancement of
+mankind; to shut out from the world every ray of intellectual
+light; to pollute every mind with superstition, the power of kings,
+the cunning and cruelty of priests, and the wealth of nations were
+exhausted.</p>
+<p>During these years of persecution, ignorance, superstition and
+slavery, nearly all the people, the kings, lawyers, doctors, the
+learned and the unlearned, believed in that frightful production of
+ignorance, fear, and faith, called witchcraft. They believed that
+man was the sport and prey of devils. They really thought that the
+very air was thick with these enemies of man. With few exceptions,
+this hideous and infamous belief was universal. Under these
+conditions, progress was almost impossible.</p>
+<p>Fear paralyzes the brain. Progress is born of courage. Fear
+believes&mdash;courage doubts. Fear falls upon the earth and
+prays&mdash;courage stands erect and thinks. Fear
+retreats&mdash;courage advances. Fear is barbarism&mdash;courage is
+civilization. Fear believes in witchcraft, in devils and in ghosts.
+Fear is religion&mdash;courage is science.</p>
+<p>The facts, upon which this terrible belief rested, were proved
+over and over again in every court of Europe. Thousands confessed
+themselves guilty&mdash;admitted that they had sold themselves to
+the devil. They gave the particulars of the sale; told what they
+said and what the devil replied. They confessed this, when they
+knew that confession was death; knew that their property would be
+confiscated, and their children left to beg their bread. This is
+one of the miracles of history&mdash;one of the strangest
+contradictions of the human mind. Without doubt, they really
+believed themselves guilty. In the first place, they believed in
+witchcraft as a fact, and when charged with it, they probably
+became insane. In their insanity they confessed their guilt. They
+found themselves abhorred and deserted&mdash;charged with a crime
+that they could not disprove. Like a man in quicksand, every effort
+only sunk them deeper. Caught in this frightful web, at the mercy
+of the spiders of superstition, hope fled, and nothing remained but
+the insanity of confession. The whole world appeared to be
+insane.</p>
+<p>In the time of James the First, a man was executed for causing a
+storm at sea with the intention of drowning one of the royal
+family. How could he disprove it? How could he show that he did not
+cause the storm? All storms were at that time generally supposed to
+be caused by the devil&mdash;the prince of the power of the
+air&mdash;and by those whom he assisted.</p>
+<p>I implore you to remember that the believers in such impossible
+things were the authors of our creeds and confessions of faith.</p>
+<p>A woman was tried and convicted before Sir Matthew Hale, one of
+the great judges and lawyers of England, for having caused children
+to vomit crooked pins. She was also charged with having nursed
+devils. The learned judge charged the intelligent jury that there
+was no doubt as to the existence of witches; that it was
+established by all history, and expressly taught by the Bible.</p>
+<p>The woman was hanged and her body burned.</p>
+<p>Sir Thomas More declared that to give up witchcraft was to throw
+away the sacred Scriptures. In my judgment, he was right.</p>
+<p>John Wesley was a firm believer in ghosts and witches, and
+insisted upon it, years after all laws upon the subject had been
+repealed in England. I beg of you to remember that John Wesley was
+the founder of the Methodist Church.</p>
+<p>In New England, a woman was charged with being a witch, and with
+having changed herself into a fox. While in that condition she was
+attacked and bitten by some dogs. A committee of three men, by
+order of the court, examined this woman. They removed her clothing
+and searched for "witch spots." That is to say, spots into which
+needles could be thrust without giving her pain. They reported to
+the court that such spots were found. She denied, however, that she
+ever had changed herself into a fox. Upon the report of the
+committee she was found guilty and actually executed. This was done
+by our Puritan fathers, by the gentlemen who braved the dangers of
+the deep for the sake of worshiping God and persecuting their
+fellow-men.</p>
+<p>In those days people believed in what was known as
+lycanthropy&mdash;that is, that persons, with the assistance of the
+devil, could assume the form of wolves. An instance is given where
+a man was attacked by a wolf. He defended himself, and succeeded in
+cutting off one of the animal's paws. The wolf ran away. The man
+picked up the paw, put it in his pocket and carried it home. There
+he found his wife with one of her hands gone. He took the paw from
+his pocket. It had changed to a human hand. He charged his wife
+with being a witch. She was tried. She confessed her guilt, and was
+burned.</p>
+<p>People were burned for causing frosts in summer&mdash;for
+destroying crops with hail&mdash;for causing storms&mdash;for
+making cows go dry, and even for souring beer. There was no
+impossibility for which some one was not tried and convicted. The
+life of no one was secure. To be charged, was to be convicted.
+Every man was at the mercy of every other. This infamous belief was
+so firmly seated in the minds of the people, that to express a
+doubt as to its truth was to be suspected. Whoever denied the
+existence of witches and devils was denounced as an infidel.</p>
+<p>They believed that animals were often taken possession of by
+devils, and that the killing of the animal would destroy the devil.
+They absolutely tried, convicted, and executed dumb beasts.</p>
+<p>At Basle, in 1470, a rooster was tried upon the charge of having
+laid an egg. Rooster eggs were used only in making witch
+ointment,&mdash;this everybody knew. The rooster was convicted and
+with all due solemnity was burned in the public square. So a hog
+and six pigs were tried for having killed and partially eaten a
+child. The hog was convicted,&mdash;but the pigs, on account
+probably of their extreme youth, were acquitted. As late as 1740, a
+cow was tried and convicted of being possessed by a devil.</p>
+<p>They used to exorcise rats, locusts, snakes and vermin. They
+used to go through the alleys, streets, and fields, and warn them
+to leave within a certain number of days. In case they disobeyed,
+they were threatened with pains and penalties.</p>
+<p>But let us be careful how we laugh at these things. Let us not
+pride ourselves too much on the progress of our age. We must not
+forget that some of our people are yet in the same intelligent
+business. Only a little while ago, the governor of Minnesota
+appointed a day of fasting and prayer, to see if some power could
+not be induced to kill the grasshoppers, or send them into some
+other state.</p>
+<p>About the close of the fifteenth century, so great was the
+excitement with regard to the existence of witchcraft that Pope
+Innocent VIII. issued a bull directing the inquisitors to be
+vigilant in searching out and punishing all guilty of this crime.
+Forms for the trial were regularly laid down in a book or a
+pamphlet called the "Malleus Maleficorum" (Hammer of Witches),
+which was issued by the Roman See. Popes Alexander, Leo, and
+Adrian, issued like bulls. For two hundred and fifty years the
+church was busy in punishing the impossible crime of witchcraft; in
+burning, hanging and torturing men, women, and children.
+Protestants were as active as Catholics, and in Geneva five hundred
+witches were burned at the stake in a period of three months. About
+one thousand were executed in one year in the diocese of Como. At
+least one hundred thousand victims suffered in Germany alone: the
+last execution (in Wurtzburg) taking place as late as 1749. Witches
+were burned in Switzerland as late as 1780.</p>
+<p>In England the same frightful scenes were enacted. Statutes were
+passed from Henry VI. to James I., defining the crime and its
+punishment. The last act passed by the British parliament was when
+Lord Bacon was a member of the House of Commons; and this act was
+not repealed until 1736.</p>
+<p>Sir William Blackstone, in his Commentaries on the Laws of
+England, says: "To deny the possibility, nay, actual existence of
+witchcraft and sorcery, is at once flatly to contradict the word of
+God in various passages both of the Old and New Testament; and the
+thing itself is a truth to which every nation in the world hath in
+its turn borne testimony, either by examples seemingly well
+attested, or by prohibitory laws, which at least suppose the
+possibility of a commerce with evil spirits."</p>
+<p>In Brown's Dictionary of the Bible, published at Edinburg,
+Scotland, in 1807, it is said that: "A witch is a woman that has
+dealings with Satan. That such persons are among men is abundantly
+plain from Scripture, and that they ought to be put to death."</p>
+<p>This work was re-published in Albany, New York, in 1816. No
+wonder the clergy of that city are ignorant and bigoted even unto
+this day.</p>
+<p>In 1716, Mrs. Hicks and her daughter, nine years of age, were
+hanged for selling their souls to the devil, and raising a storm by
+pulling off their stockings and making a lather of soap.</p>
+<p>In England it has been estimated that at least thirty thousand
+were hanged and burned. The last victim executed in Scotland,
+perished in 1722. "She was an innocent old woman, who had so little
+idea of her situation as to rejoice at the sight of the fire which
+was destined to consume her. She had a daughter, lame both of hands
+and of feet&mdash;a circumstance attributed to the witch having
+been used to transform her daughter into a pony and getting her
+shod by the devil."</p>
+<p>In 1692, nineteen persons were executed and one pressed to death
+in Salem, Massachusetts, for the crime of witchcraft.</p>
+<p>It was thought in those days that men and women made compacts
+with the devil, orally and in writing. That they abjured God and
+Jesus Christ, and dedicated themselves wholly to the devil. The
+contracts were confirmed at a general meeting of witches and
+ghosts, over which the devil himself presided; and the persons
+generally signed the articles of agreement with their own blood.
+These contracts were, in some instances, for a few years; in
+others, for life. General assemblies of the witches were held at
+least once a year, at which they appeared entirely naked, besmeared
+with an ointment made from the bodies of unbaptized infants. "To
+these meetings they rode from great distances on broomsticks,
+pokers, goats, hogs, and dogs. Here they did homage to the prince
+of hell, and offered him sacrifices of young children, and
+practiced all sorts of license until the break of day."</p>
+<p>"As late as 1815, Belgium was disgraced by a witch trial; and
+guilt was established by the water ordeal." "In 1836, the populace
+of Hela, near Dantzic, twice plunged into the sea a woman reputed
+to be a sorceress; and as the miserable creature persisted in
+rising to the surface, she was pronounced guilty, and beaten to
+death."</p>
+<p>"It was believed that the bodies of devils are not like those of
+men and animals, cast in an unchangeable mould. It was thought they
+were like clouds, refined and subtle matter, capable of assuming
+any form and penetrating into any orifice. The horrible tortures
+they endured in their place of punishment rendered them extremely
+sensitive to suffering, and they continually sought a temperate and
+somewhat moist warmth in order to allay their pangs. It was for
+this reason they so frequently entered into men and women."</p>
+<p>The devil could transport men, at his will, through the air. He
+could beget children; and Martin Luther himself had come in contact
+with one of these children. He recommended the mother to throw the
+child into the river, in order to free their house from the
+presence of a devil.</p>
+<p>It was believed that the devil could transform people into any
+shape he pleased.</p>
+<p>Whoever denied these things was denounced as an infidel. All the
+believers in witchcraft confidently appealed to the Bible. Their
+mouths were filled with passages demonstrating the existence of
+witches and their power Over human beings. By the Bible they proved
+that innumerable evil spirits were ranging over the world
+endeavoring to ruin mankind; that these spirits possessed a power
+and wisdom far transcending the limits of human faculties; that
+they delighted in every misfortune that could befall the world;
+that their malice was superhuman. That they caused tempests was
+proved by the action of the devil toward Job; by the passage in the
+book of Revelation describing the four angels who held the four
+winds, and to whom it was given to afflict the earth. They believed
+the devil could carry persons hundreds of miles, in a few seconds,
+through the air. They believed this, because they knew that Christ
+had been carried by the devil in the same manner and placed on a
+pinnacle of the temple. "The prophet Habakkuk had been transported
+by a spirit from Judea to Babylon; and Philip, the evangelist, had
+been the object of a similar miracle; and in the same way Saint
+Paul had been carried in the body into the third heaven."</p>
+<p>"In those pious days, they believed that <i>Incubi</i> and
+<i>Succubi</i> were forever wandering among mankind, alluring, by
+more than human charms, the unwary to their destruction, and laying
+plots, which were too often successful, against the virtue of the
+saints. Sometimes the witches kindled in the monastic priest a more
+terrestrial fire. People told, with bated breath, how, under the
+spell of a vindictive woman, four successive abbots in a German
+monastery had been wasted away by an unholy flame."</p>
+<p>An instance is given in which the devil not only assumed the
+appearance of a holy man, in order to pay his addresses to a lady,
+but when discovered, crept under the bed, suffered himself to be
+dragged out, and was impudent enough to declare that he was the
+veritable bishop. So perfectly had he assumed the form and features
+of the prelate that those who knew the bishop best were
+deceived.</p>
+<p>One can hardly imagine the frightful state of the human mind
+during these long centuries of darkness and superstition. To them,
+these things were awful and frightful realities. Hovering above
+them in the air, in their houses, in the bosoms of friends, in
+their very bodies, in all the darkness of night, everywhere,
+around, above and below, were innumerable hosts of unclean and
+malignant devils.</p>
+<p>From the malice of those leering and vindictive vampires of the
+air, the church pretended to defend mankind. Pursued by these
+phantoms, the frightened multitudes fell upon their faces and
+implored the aid of robed hypocrisy and sceptered theft.</p>
+<p>Take from the orthodox church of to-day the threat and fear of
+hell, and it becomes an extinct volcano.</p>
+<p>Take from the church the miraculous, the supernatural, the
+incomprehensible, the unreasonable, the impossible, the unknowable,
+and the absurd, and nothing but a vacuum remains.</p>
+<p>Notwithstanding all the infamous things justly laid to the
+charge of the church, we are told that the civilization of to-day
+is the child of what we are pleased to call the superstition of the
+past.</p>
+<p>Religion has not civilized man&mdash;man has civilized religion.
+God improves as man advances.</p>
+<p>Let me call your attention to what we have received from the
+followers of the ghosts. Let me give you an outline of the sciences
+as taught by these philosophers of the clouds.</p>
+<p>All diseases were produced, either as a punishment by the good
+ghosts, or out of pure malignity by the bad ones. There were,
+properly speaking, no diseases. The sick were possessed by ghosts.
+The science of medicine consisted in knowing how to persuade these
+ghosts to vacate the premises. For thousands of years the diseased
+were treated with incantations, with hideous noises, with drums and
+gongs. Everything was done to make the visit of the ghost as
+unpleasant as possible, and they generally succeeded in making
+things so disagreeable that if the ghost did not leave, the patient
+did. These ghosts were supposed to be of different rank, power and
+dignity. Now and then a man pretended to have won the favor of some
+powerful ghost, and that gave him power over the little ones. Such
+a man became an eminent physician.</p>
+<p>It was found that certain kinds of smoke, such as that produced
+by burning the liver of a fish, the dried skin of a serpent, the
+eyes of a toad, or the tongue of an adder, were exceedingly
+offensive to the nostrils of an ordinary ghost. With this smoke,
+the sick room would be filled until the ghost vanished or the
+patient died.</p>
+<p>It was also believed that certain words,&mdash;the names of the
+most powerful ghosts,&mdash;when properly pronounced, were very
+effective weapons. It was for a long time thought that Latin words
+were the best,&mdash;Latin being a dead language, and known by the
+clergy. Others thought that two sticks laid across each other and
+held before the wicked ghost would cause it instantly to flee in
+dread away.</p>
+<p>For thousands of years, the practice of medicine consisted in
+driving these evil spirits out of the bodies of men.</p>
+<p>In some instances, bargains and compromises were made with the
+ghosts. One case is given where a multitude of devils traded a man
+for a herd of swine. In this transaction the devils were the
+losers, as the swine immediately drowned themselves in the sea.
+This idea of disease appears to have been almost universal, and is
+by no means yet extinct.</p>
+<p>The contortions of the epileptic, the strange twitchings of
+those afflicted with chorea, the shakings of palsy, dreams,
+trances, and the numberless frightful phenomena produced by
+diseases of the nerves, were all seized upon as so many proofs that
+the bodies of men were filled with unclean and malignant
+ghosts.</p>
+<p>Whoever endeavored to account for these things by natural
+causes, whoever attempted to cure diseases by natural means, was
+denounced by the church as an infidel. To explain anything was a
+crime. It was to the interest of the priest that all phenomena
+should be accounted for by the will and power of gods and devils.
+The moment it is admitted that all phenomena are within the domain
+of the natural, the necessity for a priest has disappeared.
+Religion breathes the air of the supernatural. Take from the mind
+of man the idea of the supernatural, and religion ceases to exist.
+For this, reason, the church has always despised the man who
+explained the wonderful. Upon this principle, nothing was left
+undone to stay the science of medicine. As long as plagues and
+pestilences could be stopped by prayer, the priest was useful. The
+moment the physician found a cure, the priest became an
+extravagance. The moment it began to be apparent that prayer could
+do nothing for the body, the priest shifted his ground and began
+praying for the soul.</p>
+<p>Long after the devil idea was substantially abandoned in the
+practice of medicine, and when it was admitted that God had nothing
+to do with ordinary coughs and colds, it was still believed that
+all the frightful diseases were sent by him as punishments for the
+wickedness of the people. It was thought to be a kind of blasphemy
+to even try, by any natural means, to stay the ravages of
+pestilence. Formerly, during the prevalence of plague and
+epidemics, the arrogance of the priest was boundless. He told the
+people that they had slighted the clergy, that they had refused to
+pay tithes, that they had doubted some of the doctrines of the
+church, and that God was now taking his revenge. The people for the
+most part, believed this infamous tissue of priestcraft. They
+hastened to fall upon their knees; they poured out their wealth
+upon the altars of hypocrisy; they abased and debased themselves;
+from their minds they banished all doubts, and made haste to crawl
+in the very dust of humility.</p>
+<p>The church never wanted disease to be under the control of man.
+Timothy Dwight, president of Yale College, preached a sermon
+against vaccination. His idea was, that if God had decreed from all
+eternity that a certain man should die with the small-pox, it was a
+frightful sin to avoid and annul that decree by the trick of
+vaccination. Small-pox being regarded as one of the heaviest guns
+in the arsenal of heaven, to spike it was the height of
+presumption. Plagues and pestilences were instrumentalities in the
+hands of God with which to gain the love and worship of mankind. To
+find a cure for disease was to take a weapon from the church. No
+one tries to cure the ague with prayer. Quinine has been found
+altogether more reliable. Just as soon as a specific is found for a
+disease, that disease will be left out of the list of prayer. The
+number of diseases with which God from time to time afflicts
+mankind, is continually decreasing. In a few years all of them will
+be under the control of man, the gods will be left unarmed, and the
+threats of their priests will excite only a smile.</p>
+<p>The science of medicine has had but one enemy&mdash;religion.
+Man was afraid to save his body for fear he might lose his
+soul.</p>
+<p>Is it any wonder that the people in those days believed in and
+taught the infamous doctrine of eternal punishment&mdash;a doctrine
+that makes God a heartless monster and man a slimy hypocrite and
+slave?</p>
+<p>The ghosts were historians, and their histories were the
+grossest absurdities. "Tales told by idiots, full of sound and
+fury, signifying nothing." In those days the histories were written
+by the monks, who, as a rule, were almost as superstitious as they
+were dishonest. They wrote as though they had been witnesses of
+every occurrence they related. They wrote the history of every
+country of importance. They told all the past and predicted all the
+future with an impudence that amounted to sublimity. "They traced
+the order of St. Michael, in France, to the archangel himself, and
+alleged that he was the founder of a chivalric order in heaven
+itself. They said that Tartars originally came from hell, and that
+they were called Tartars because Tartarus was one of the names of
+perdition. They declared that Scotland was so named after Scota, a
+daughter of Pharaoh, who landed in Ireland, invaded Scotland, and
+took it by force of arms. This statement was made in a letter
+addressed to the Pope in the fourteenth century, and was alluded to
+as a well-known fact. The letter was written by some of the highest
+dignitaries, and by the direction of the King himself."</p>
+<p>These gentlemen accounted for the red on the breasts of robins,
+from the fact that these birds carried water to unbaptized infants
+in hell.</p>
+<p>Matthew, of Paris, an eminent historian of the fourteenth
+century, gave the world the following piece of information: "It is
+well known that Mohammed was once a cardinal, and became a heretic
+because he failed in his effort to be elected pope;" and that
+having drank to excess, he fell by the roadside, and in this
+condition was killed by swine. "And for that reason, his followers
+abhor pork even unto this day."</p>
+<p>Another eminent historian informs us that Nero was in the habit
+of vomiting frogs. When I read this, I said to myself: Some of the
+croakers of the present day against Progress would be the better
+for such a vomit.</p>
+<p>The history of Charlemagne was written by Turpin, of Rheims. He
+was a bishop. He assures us that the walls of a city fell down in
+answer to prayer. That there were giants in those days who could
+take fifty ordinary men under their arms and walk away with them.
+"With the greatest of these, a direct descendant of Goliath, one
+Orlando had a theological discussion, and that in the heat of the
+debate, when the giant was overwhelmed with the argument, Orlando
+rushed forward and inflicted a fatal stab."</p>
+<p>The history of Britain, written by the archdeacons of Monmouth
+and Oxford, was wonderfully popular. According to them, Brutus
+conquered England and built the city of London. During his time, it
+rained pure blood for three days. At another time, a monster came
+from the sea, and, after having devoured great multitudes of
+people, swallowed the king and disappeared. They tell us that King
+Arthur was not born like other mortals, but was the result of a
+magical contrivance; that he had great luck in killing giants; that
+he killed one in France that had the cheerful habit of eating some
+thirty men a day. That this giant had clothes woven of the beards
+of the kings he had devoured. To cap the climax, one of the authors
+of this book was promoted for having written the only reliable
+history of his country.</p>
+<p>In all the histories of those days there is hardly a single
+truth. Facts were considered unworthy of preservation. Anything
+that really happened was not of sufficient interest or importance
+to be recorded. The great religious historian, Eusebius,
+ingenuously remarks that in his history he carefully omitted
+whatever tended to discredit the church, and that he piously
+magnified all that conduced to her glory.</p>
+<p>The same glorious principle was scrupulously adhered to by all
+the historians of that time.</p>
+<p>They wrote, and the people believed, that the tracks of
+Pharoah's chariots were still visible on the sands of the Red Sea,
+and that they had been miraculously preserved from the winds and
+waves as perpetual witnesses of the great miracle there
+performed.</p>
+<p>It is safe to say that every truth in the histories of those
+times is the result of accident or mistake.</p>
+<p>They accounted for everything as the work of good and evil
+spirits. With cause and effect they had nothing to do. Facts were
+in no way related to each other. God, governed by infinite caprice,
+filled the world with miracles and disconnected events. From the
+quiver of his hatred came the arrows of famine, pestilence, and
+death.</p>
+<p>The moment that the idea is abandoned that all is natural; that
+all phenomena are the necessary links in the endless chain of
+being, the conception of history becomes impossible. With the
+ghosts, the present is not the child of the past, nor the mother of
+the future. In the domain of religion all is chance, accident, and
+caprice.</p>
+<p>Do not forget, I pray you, that our creeds were written by the
+cotemporaries of these historians.</p>
+<p>The same idea was applied to law. It was believed by our
+intelligent ancestors that all law derived its sacredness and its
+binding force from the fact that it had been communicated to man by
+the ghosts. Of course it was not pretended that the ghosts told
+everybody the law; but they told it to a few, and the few told it
+to the people, and the people, as a rule, paid them exceedingly
+well for their trouble. It was thousands of ages before the people
+commenced making laws for themselves, and strange as it may appear,
+most of these laws were vastly superior to the ghost article.
+Through the web and woof of human legislation began to run and
+shine and glitter the golden thread of justice.</p>
+<p>During these years of darkness it was believed that rather than
+see an act of injustice done; rather than see the innocent suffer;
+rather than see the guilty triumph, some ghost would interfere.
+This belief, as a rule, gave great satisfaction to the victorious
+party, and as the other man was dead, no complaint was heard from
+him.</p>
+<p>This doctrine was the sanctification of brute force and chance.
+They had trials by battle, by fire, by water, and by lot. Persons
+were made to grasp hot iron, and if it burned them their guilt was
+established. Others, with tied hands and feet, were cast into the
+sea, and if they sank, the verdict of guilty was
+unanimous,&mdash;if they did not sink, they were in league with
+devils.</p>
+<p>So in England, persons charged with crime could appeal to the
+corsned. The corsned was a piece of the sacramental bread. If the
+defendant could swallow this piece he went acquit. Godwin, Earl of
+Kent, in the time of Edward the Confessor, appealed to the corsned.
+He failed to swallow it and was choked to death.</p>
+<p>The ghosts and their followers always took delight in torture,
+in cruel and unusual punishments. For the infraction of most of
+their laws, death was the penalty&mdash;death produced by stoning
+and by fire. Sometimes, when man committed only murder, he was
+allowed to flee to some city of refuge. Murder was a crime against
+man. But for saying certain words, or denying certain doctrines, or
+for picking up sticks on certain days, or for worshiping the wrong
+ghost, or for failing to pray to the right one, or for laughing at
+a priest, or for saying that wine was not blood, or that bread was
+not flesh, or for failing to regard ram's horns as artillery, or
+for insisting that a dry bone was scarcely sufficient to take the
+place of water works, or that a raven, as a rule, made a poor
+landlord:&mdash;death, produced by all the ways that the ingenuity
+of hatred could devise, was the penalty.</p>
+<p>Law is a growth&mdash;it is a science. Right and wrong exist in
+the nature of things. Things are not right because they are
+commanded, nor wrong because they are prohibited. There are real
+crimes enough without creating artificial ones. All progress in
+legislation has for centuries consisted in repealing the laws of
+the ghosts.</p>
+<p>The idea of right and wrong is born of man's capacity to enjoy
+and suffer. If man could not suffer, if he could not inflict injury
+upon his fellow, if he could neither feel nor inflict pain, the
+idea of right and wrong never would have entered his brain. But for
+this, the word conscience never would have passed the lips of
+man.</p>
+<p>There is one good&mdash;happiness. There is but one
+sin&mdash;selfishness. All law should be for the preservation of
+the one and the destruction of the other.</p>
+<p>Under the regime of the ghosts, laws were not supposed to exist
+in the nature of things. They were supposed to be simply the
+irresponsible command of a ghost. These commands were not supposed
+to rest upon reason, they were the product of arbitrary will.</p>
+<p>The penalties for the violation of these laws were as cruel as
+the laws were senseless and absurd. Working on the Sabbath and
+murder were both punished with death. The tendency of such laws is
+to blot from the human heart the sense of justice.</p>
+<p>To show you how perfectly every department of knowledge, or
+ignorance rather, was saturated with superstition, I will for a
+moment refer to the science of language.</p>
+<p>It was thought by our fathers, that Hebrew was the original
+language; that it was taught to Adam in the Garden of Eden by the
+Almighty, and that consequently all languages came from, and could
+be traced to, the Hebrew. Every fact inconsistent with that idea
+was discarded. According to the ghosts, the trouble at the tower of
+Babel accounted for the fact that all people did not speak Hebrew.
+The Babel business settled all questions in the science of
+language.</p>
+<p>After a time, so many facts were found to be inconsistent with
+the Hebrew idea that it began to fall into disrepute, and other
+languages began to compete for the honor of being the original.</p>
+<p>Andre Kempe, in 1569, published a work on the language of
+Paradise, in which he maintained that God spoke to Adam in Swedish;
+that Adam answered in Danish; and that the serpent&mdash;which
+appears to me quite probable&mdash;spoke to Eve in French. Erro, in
+a work published at Madrid, took the ground that Basque was the
+language spoken in the Garden of Eden; but in 1580 Goropius
+published his celebrated work at Antwerp, in which he put the whole
+matter at rest by showing, beyond all doubt, that the language
+spoken in Paradise was neither more nor less than plain Holland
+Dutch.</p>
+<p>The real founder of the science of language was Liebnitz, a
+cotemporary of Sir Isaac Newton. He discarded the idea that all
+languages could be traced to one language. He maintained that
+language was a natural growth. Experience teaches us that this must
+be so. Words are continually dying and continually being born.
+Words are naturally and necessarily produced. Words are the
+garments of thought, the robes of ideas. Some are as rude as the
+skins of wild beasts, and others glisten and glitter like silk and
+gold. They have been born of hatred and revenge; of love and
+self-sacrifice; of hope and fear, of agony and joy. These words are
+born of the terror and beauty of nature. The stars have fashioned
+them. In them mingle the darkness and the dawn. From everything
+they have taken something. Words are the crystalizations of human
+history, of all that man has enjoyed and suffered&mdash;his
+victories and defeats&mdash;all that he has lost and won. Words are
+the shadows of all that has been&mdash;the mirrors of all that
+is.</p>
+<p>The ghosts also enlightened our fathers in astronomy and
+geology. According to them the earth was made out of nothing, and a
+little more nothing having been taken than was used in the
+construction of this world, the stars were made out of what was
+left over. Cosmas, in the sixth century, taught that the stars were
+impelled by angels, who either carried them on their shoulders,
+rolled them in front of them, or drew them after. He also taught
+that each angel that pushed a star took great pains to observe what
+the other angels were doing, so that the relative distances between
+the stars might always remain the same. He also gave his idea as to
+the form of the world.</p>
+<p>He stated that the world was a vast parallelogram; that on the
+outside was a strip of land, like the frame of a common slate; that
+then there was a strip of water, and in the middle a great piece of
+land; that Adam and Eve lived on the outer strip; that their
+descendants, with the exception of the Noah family, were drowned by
+a flood on this outer strip; that the ark finally rested on the
+middle piece of land where we now are. He accounted for night and
+day by saying that on the outside strip of land there was a high
+mountain, around which the sun and moon revolved, and that when the
+sun was on the other side of the mountain, it was night; and when
+on this side, it was day.</p>
+<p>He also declared that the earth was flat. This he proved by many
+passages from the Bible. Among other reasons for believing the
+earth to be flat, he brought forward the following: We are told in
+the New Testament that Christ shall come again in glory and power,
+and all the world shall see him. Now, if the world is round, how
+are the people on the other side going to see Christ when he comes?
+That settled the question, and the church not only endorsed the
+book, but declared that whoever believed less or more than stated
+by Cosmas, was a heretic.</p>
+<p>In those blessed days, Ignorance was a king and Science an
+outcast.</p>
+<p>They knew the moment this earth ceased to be the centre of the
+universe, and became a mere speck in the starry heaven of
+existence, that their religion would become a childish fable of the
+past.</p>
+<p>In the name and by the authority of the ghosts, men enslaved
+their fellow-men; they trampled upon the rights of women and
+children. In the name and by the authority of ghosts, they bought
+and sold and destroyed each other; they filled heaven with tyrants
+and earth with slaves, the present with despair and the future with
+horror. In the name and by the authority of the ghosts, they
+imprisoned the human mind, polluted the conscience, hardened the
+heart, subverted justice, crowned robbery, sainted hypocrisy, and
+extinguished for a thousand years the torch of reason.</p>
+<p>I have endeavored, in some faint degree, to show you what has
+happened, and what always will happen when men are governed by
+superstition and fear; when they desert the sublime standard of
+reason; when they take the words of others and do not investigate
+for themselves.</p>
+<p>Even the great men of those days were nearly as weak in this
+matter as the most ignorant. Kepler, one of the greatest men of the
+world, an astronomer second to none, although he plucked from the
+stars the secrets of the universe, was an astrologer, and really
+believed that he could predict the career of a man by finding what
+star was in the ascendant at his birth. This great man breathed, so
+to speak, the atmosphere of his time. He believed in the music of
+the spheres, and assigned alto, bass, tenor, and treble to certain
+stars.</p>
+<p>Tycho Brahe, another astronomer, kept an idiot, whose
+disconnected and meaningless words he carefully set down, and then
+put them together in such manner as to make prophecies, and then
+waited patiently to see them fulfilled. Luther believed that he had
+actually seen the devil, and had discussed points of theology with
+him. The human mind was in chains. Every idea almost was a monster.
+Thought was deformed. Facts were looked upon as worthless. Only the
+wonderful was worth preserving. Things that actually happened were
+not considered worth recording;&mdash;real occurrences were too
+common. Everybody expected the miraculous.</p>
+<p>The ghosts were supposed to be busy; devils were thought to be
+the most industrious things in the universe, and with these imps,
+every occurrence of an unusual character was in some way connected.
+There was no order, no serenity, no certainty in anything.
+Everything depended upon ghosts and phantoms. Man was, for the most
+part, at the mercy of malevolent spirits. He protected himself as
+best he could with holy water and tapers and wafers and cathedrals.
+He made noises and rung bells to frighten the ghosts, and he made
+music to charm them. He used smoke to choke them, and incense to
+please them. He wore beads and crosses. He said prayers, and hired
+others to say them. He fasted when he was hungry, and feasted when
+he was not. He believed everything that seemed unreasonable, just
+to appease the ghosts. He humbled himself. He crawled in the dust.
+He shut the doors and windows, and excluded every ray of light from
+the temple of the soul. He debauched and polluted his own mind, and
+toiled night and day to repair the walls of his own prison. From
+the garden of his heart he plucked and trampled upon the holy
+flowers of pity.</p>
+<p>The priests reveled in horrible descriptions of hell. Concerning
+the wrath of God, they grew eloquent. They denounced man as totally
+depraved. They made reason blasphemy, and pity a crime. Nothing so
+delighted them as painting the torments and sufferings of the lost.
+Over the worm that never dies they grew poetic; and the second
+death filled them with a kind of holy delight. According to them,
+the smoke and cries ascending from hell were the perfume and music
+of heaven.</p>
+<p>At the risk of being tiresome, I have said what I have to show
+you the productions of the human mind, when enslaved; the effects
+of wide-spread ignorance&mdash;the results of fear. I want to
+convince you that every form of slavery is a viper, that, sooner or
+later, will strike its poison fangs into the bosoms of men.</p>
+<p>The first great step towards progress, is, for man to cease to
+be the slave of man; the second, to cease to be the slave of the
+monsters of his own creation&mdash;of the ghosts and phantoms of
+the air.</p>
+<p>For ages the human race was imprisoned.</p>
+<p>Through the bars and grates came a few struggling rays of light.
+Against these grates and bars Science pressed its pale and
+thoughtful face, wooed by the holy dawn of human advancement.</p>
+<p>Men found that the real was the useful; that what a man knows is
+better than what a ghost says; that an event is more valuable than
+a prophecy. They found that diseases were not produced by spirits,
+and could not be cured by frightening them away. They found that
+death was as natural as life. They began to study the anatomy and
+chemistry of the human body, and found that all was natural and
+within the domain of law.</p>
+<p>The conjurer and sorcerer were discarded, and the physician and
+surgeon employed. They found that the earth was not flat; that the
+stars were not mere specks. They found that being born under a
+particular planet had nothing to do with the fortunes of men.</p>
+<p>The astrologer was discharged and the astronomer took his
+place.</p>
+<p>They found that the earth had swept through the constellations
+for millions of ages. They found that good and evil were produced
+by natural causes, and not by ghosts; that man could not be good
+enough or bad enough to stop or cause a rain; that diseases were
+produced as naturally as grass, and were not sent as punishments
+upon man for failing to believe a certain creed. They found that
+man, through intelligence, could take advantage of the forces of
+nature&mdash;that he could make the waves, the winds, the flames,
+and the lightnings of heaven do his bidding and minister to his
+wants. They found that the ghosts knew nothing of benefit to man;
+that they were utterly ignorant of geology&mdash;of
+astronomy&mdash;of geography;&mdash;that they knew nothing of
+history;&mdash;that they were poor doctors and worse
+surgeons;&mdash;that they knew nothing of law and less of justice;
+that they were without brains, and utterly destitute of hearts;
+that they knew nothing of the rights of men; that they were
+despisers of women, the haters of progress, the enemies of science,
+and the destroyers of liberty.</p>
+<p>The condition of the world during the Dark Ages shows exactly
+the result of enslaving the bodies and souls of men. In those days
+there was no freedom. Labor was despised, and a laborer was
+considered but little above a beast. Ignorance, like a vast cowl,
+covered the brain of the world, and superstition ran riot with the
+imagination of man. The air was filled with angels, with demons and
+monsters. Credulity sat upon the throne of the soul, and Reason was
+an exiled king. A man to be distinguished must be a soldier or a
+monk. War and theology, that is to say, murder and hypocrisy, were
+the principal employments of man. Industry was a slave, theft was
+commerce; murder was war, hypocrisy was religion.</p>
+<p>Every Christian country maintained that it was no robbery to
+take the property of Mohammedans by force, and no murder to kill
+the owners. Lord Bacon was the first man of note who maintained
+that a Christian country was bound to keep its plighted faith with
+an infidel nation. Reading and writing were considered dangerous
+arts. Every layman who could read and write was suspected of being
+a heretic. All thought was discouraged. They forged chains of
+superstition for the minds, and manacles of iron for the bodies of
+men. The earth was ruled by the cowl and sword,&mdash;by the mitre
+and scepter,&mdash;by the altar and throne,&mdash;by Fear and
+Force,&mdash;by Ignorance and Faith,&mdash;by ghouls and
+ghosts.</p>
+<p>In the fifteenth century the following law was in force in
+England:</p>
+<p>"That whosoever reads the Scriptures in the mother tongue, shall
+forfeit land, cattle, life, and goods from their heirs forever, and
+so be condemned for heretics to God, enemies to the crown, and most
+arrant traitors to the land."</p>
+<p>During the first year this law was in force thirty-nine were
+hanged for its violation and their bodies burned.</p>
+<p>In the sixteenth century men were burned because they failed to
+kneel to a procession of monks.</p>
+<p>The slightest word uttered against the superstition of the time
+was punished with death.</p>
+<p>Even the reformers, so-called, of those days, had no idea of
+intellectual liberty&mdash;no idea even of toleration. Luther,
+Knox, Calvin, believed in religious liberty only when they were in
+the minority. The moment they were clothed with power they began to
+exterminate with fire and sword.</p>
+<p>Castalio was the first minister who advocated the liberty of the
+soul. He was regarded by the reformers as a criminal, and treated
+as though he had committed the crime of crimes.</p>
+<p>Bodinus, a lawyer of France, about the same time, wrote a few
+words in favor of the freedom of conscience, but public opinion was
+overwhelmingly against him. The people were ready, anxious, and
+willing, with whip, and chain, and fire, to drive from the mind of
+man the heresy that he had a right to think.</p>
+<p>Montaigne, a man blest with so much common sense that he was the
+most uncommon man of his time, was the first to raise a voice
+against torture in France. But what was the voice of one man
+against the terrible cry of ignorant, infatuated, superstitious and
+malevolent millions? It was the cry of a drowning man in the wild
+roar of the cruel sea.</p>
+<p>In spite of the efforts of the brave few the infamous war
+against the freedom of the soul was waged until at least one
+hundred millions of human beings&mdash;fathers, mothers, brothers,
+sisters&mdash;with hopes, loves, and aspirations like ourselves,
+were sacrificed upon the cruel altar of an ignorant faith. They
+perished in every way by which death can be produced. Every nerve
+of pain was sought out and touched by the believers in ghosts.</p>
+<p>For my part I glory in the fact, that here in the New
+World,&mdash;in the United States,&mdash;liberty of conscience was
+first guaranteed to man, and that the Constitution of the United
+States was the first great decree entered in the high court of
+human equity forever divorcing church and state,&mdash;the first
+injunction granted against the interference of the ghosts. This was
+one of the grandest steps ever taken by the human race in the
+direction of Progress.</p>
+<p>You will ask what has caused this wonderful change in three
+hundred years. And I answer&mdash;the inventions and discoveries of
+the few;&mdash;the brave thoughts, the heroic utterances of the
+few;&mdash;the acquisition of a few facts.</p>
+<p>Besides, you must remember that every wrong in some way tends to
+abolish itself. It is hard to make a lie stand always. A lie will
+not fit a fact. It will only fit another lie made for the purpose.
+The life of a lie is simply a question of time. Nothing but truth
+is immortal. The nobles and kings quarreled;&mdash;the priests
+began to dispute;&mdash;the ideas of government began to
+change.</p>
+<p>In 1441 printing was discovered. At that time the past was a
+vast cemetery with hardly an epitaph. The ideas of men had mostly
+perished in the brain that produced them. The lips of the human
+race had been sealed. Printing gave pinions to thought. It
+preserved ideas. It made it possible for man to bequeath to the
+future the riches of his brain, the wealth of his soul. At first,
+it was used to flood the world with the mistakes of the ancients,
+but since that time it has been flooding the world with light.</p>
+<p>When people read they begin to reason, and when they reason they
+progress. This was another grand step in the direction of
+Progress.</p>
+<p>The discovery of powder, that put the peasant almost upon a par
+with the prince;&mdash;that put an end to the so-called age of
+chivalry;&mdash;that released a vast number of men from the
+armies;&mdash;that gave pluck and nerve a chance with brute
+strength.</p>
+<p>The discovery of America, whose shores were trod by the restless
+feet of adventure;&mdash;that brought people holding every shade of
+superstition together;&mdash;that gave the world an opportunity to
+compare notes, and to laugh at the follies of each other. Out of
+this strange mingling of all creeds, and superstitions, and facts,
+and theories, and countless opinions, came the Great Republic.</p>
+<p>Every fact has pushed a superstition from the brain and a ghost
+from the clouds. Every mechanic art is an educator. Every loom,
+every reaper and mower, every steamboat, every locomotive, every
+engine, every press, every telegraph, is a missionary of Science
+and an apostle of Progress. Every mill, every furnace, every
+building with its wheels and levers, in which something is made for
+the convenience, for the use, and for the comfort and elevation of
+man, is a church, and every school-house is a temple.</p>
+<p>Education is the most radical thing in the world.</p>
+<p>To teach the alphabet is to inaugurate a revolution.</p>
+<p>To build a schoolhouse is to construct a fort.</p>
+<p>Every library is an arsenal filled with the weapons and
+ammunition of Progress, and every fact is a monitor with sides of
+iron and a turret of steel.</p>
+<p>I thank the inventors, the discoverers, the thinkers. I thank
+Columbus and Magellan. I thank Galileo, and Copernicus, and Kepler,
+and Descartes, and Newton, and Laplace. I thank Locke, and Hume,
+and Bacon, and Shakespeare, and Kant, and Fichte, and Leibnitz, and
+Goethe. I thank Fulton, and Watts, and Volta, and Galvani, and
+Franklin, and Morse, who made lightning the messenger of man. I
+thank Humboldt, the Shakespeare of science. I thank Crompton and
+Arkwright, from whose brains leaped the looms and spindles that
+clothe the world. I thank Luther for protesting against the abuses
+of the church, and I denounce him because he was the enemy of
+liberty. I thank Calvin for writing a book in favor of religious
+freedom, and I abhor him because he burned Servetus. I thank Knox
+for resisting Episcopal persecution, and I hate him because he
+persecuted in his turn. I thank the Puritans for saying "Resistance
+to tyrants is obedience to God," and yet I am compelled to say that
+they were tyrants themselves. I thank Thomas Paine because he was a
+believer in liberty, and because he did as much to make my country
+free as any other human being. I thank Voltaire, that great man
+who, for half a century, was the intellectual emperor of Europe,
+and who, from his throne at the foot of the Alps, pointed the
+finger of scorn at every hypocrite in Christendom. I thank Darwin,
+Haeckel and B&uuml;chner, Spencer, Tyndall and Huxley, Draper,
+Lecky and Buckle.</p>
+<p>I thank the inventors, the discoverers, the thinkers, the
+scientists, the explorers, I thank the honest millions who have
+toiled.</p>
+<p>I thank the brave men with brave thoughts. They are the Atlases
+upon whose broad and mighty shoulders rests the grand fabric of
+civilization. They are the men who have broken, and are still
+breaking, the chains of Superstition. They are the Titans who
+carried Olympus by assault, and who will soon stand victors upon
+Sinai's crags.</p>
+<p>We are beginning to learn that to exchange a mistake for the
+truth&mdash;a superstition for a fact&mdash;to ascertain the
+real&mdash;is to progress.</p>
+<p>Happiness is the only possible good, and all that tends to the
+happiness of man is right, and is of value. All that tends to
+develop the bodies and minds of men; all that gives us better
+houses, better clothes, better food, better pictures, grander
+music, better heads, better hearts; all that renders us more
+intellectual and more loving, nearer just; that makes us better
+husbands and wives, better children, better citizens&mdash;all
+these things combined produce what I call Progress.</p>
+<p>Man advances only as he overcomes the obstructions of Nature,
+and this can be done only by labor and by thought. Labor is the
+foundation of all. Without labor, and without great labor, progress
+is impossible. The progress of the world depends upon the men who
+walk in the fresh furrows and through the rustling corn; upon those
+who sow and reap; upon those whose faces are radiant with the glare
+of furnace fires; upon the delvers in the mines, and the workers in
+shops; upon those who give to the winter air the ringing music of
+the axe; upon those who battle with the boisterous billows of the
+sea; upon the inventors and discoverers; upon the brave
+thinkers.</p>
+<p>From the surplus produced by labor, schools and universities are
+built and fostered. From this surplus the painter is paid for the
+productions of the pencil; the sculptor for chiseling shapeless
+rock into forms divinely beautiful, and the poet for singing the
+hopes, the loves, the memories, and the aspirations of the world.
+This surplus has given us the books in which we converse with the
+dead and living kings of the human race. It has given us all there
+is of beauty, of elegance, and of refined happiness.</p>
+<p>I am aware that there is a vast difference of opinion as to what
+progress really is; that many denounce the ideas of to-day as
+destructive of all happiness&mdash;of all good, I know that there
+are many worshipers of the past. They venerate the ancient because
+it is ancient. They see no beauty in anything from which they do
+not blow the dust of ages with the breath of praise. They say, no
+masters like the old; no religion, no governments like the ancient;
+no orators, no poets, no statesmen like those who have been dust
+for two thousand years. Others love the modern simply because it is
+modern.</p>
+<p>We should have gratitude enough to acknowledge the obligations
+we are under to the great and heroic of antiquity, and independence
+enough not to believe what they said simply because they said
+it.</p>
+<p>With the idea that labor is the basis of progress goes the truth
+that labor must be free. The laborer must be a free man.</p>
+<p>The free man, working for wife and child, gets his head and
+hands in partnership.</p>
+<p>To do the greatest amount of work in the shortest space of time,
+is the problem of free labor.</p>
+<p>Slavery does the least work in the longest space of time.</p>
+<p>Free labor will give us wealth. Free thought will give us
+truth.</p>
+<p>Slowly but surely man is freeing his imagination of these
+sexless phantoms, of these cruel ghosts. Slowly but surely he is
+rising above the superstitions of the past. He is learning to rely
+upon himself. He is beginning to find that labor is the only prayer
+that ought to be answered, and that hoping, toiling, aspiring,
+suffering men and women are of more importance than all the ghosts
+that ever wandered through the fenceless fields of space.</p>
+<p>The believers in ghosts claim still, that they are the only wise
+and virtuous people upon the earth; claim still, that there is a
+difference between them and unbelievers so vast, that they will be
+infinitely rewarded, and the others infinitely punished.</p>
+<p>I ask you to-night, do the theories and doctrines of the
+theologians satisfy the heart or brain of the nineteenth
+century?</p>
+<p>Have the churches the confidence of mankind?</p>
+<p>Does the merchant give credit to a man because he belongs to a
+church?</p>
+<p>Does the banker loan money to a man because he is a Methodist or
+Baptist?</p>
+<p>Will a certificate of good standing in any church be taken as
+collateral security for one dollar?</p>
+<p>Will you take the word of a church member, or his note, or his
+oath, simply because he is a church member?</p>
+<p>Are the clergy, as a class, better, kinder and more generous to
+their families&mdash;to their fellow-men&mdash;than doctors,
+lawyers, merchants and farmers?</p>
+<p>Does a belief in ghosts and unreasonable things necessarily make
+people honest?</p>
+<p>When a man loses confidence in Moses, must the people lose
+confidence in him?</p>
+<p>Does not the credit system in morals breed extravagance in
+sin?</p>
+<p>Why send missionaries to other lands while every penitentiary in
+ours is filled with criminals?</p>
+<p>Is it philosophical to say that they who do right carry a
+cross?</p>
+<p>Is it a source of joy to think that perdition is the destination
+of nearly all of the children of men?</p>
+<p>Is it worth while to quarrel about original sin&mdash;when there
+is so much copy?</p>
+<p>Does it pay to dispute about baptism, and the Trinity, and
+predestination, and apostolic succession and the infallibility of
+churches, of popes and of books? Does all this do any good?</p>
+<p>Are the theologians welcomers of new truths? Are they noted for
+their candor? Do they treat an opponent with common fairness? Are
+they investigators? Do they pull forward, or do they hold back?</p>
+<p>Is science indebted to the church for a solitary fact?</p>
+<p>What church is an asylum for a persecuted truth?</p>
+<p>What great reform has been inaugurated by the church?</p>
+<p>Did the church abolish slavery?</p>
+<p>Has the church raised its voice against war?</p>
+<p>I used to think that there was in religion no real restraining
+force. Upon this point my mind has changed. Religion will prevent
+man from committing artificial crimes and offences.</p>
+<p>A man committed murder. The evidence was so conclusive that he
+confessed his guilt.</p>
+<p>He was asked why he killed his fellow-man.</p>
+<p>He replied: "For money."</p>
+<p>"Did you get any?"</p>
+<p>"Yes."</p>
+<p>"How much?"</p>
+<p>"Fifteen cents."</p>
+<p>"What did you do with this money?"</p>
+<p>"Spent it."</p>
+<p>"What for?"</p>
+<p>"Liquor."</p>
+<p>"What else did you find upon the dead man?" "He had his dinner
+in a bucket&mdash;some meat and bread."</p>
+<p>"What did you do with that?"</p>
+<p>"I ate the bread."</p>
+<p>"What did you do with the meat?"</p>
+<p>"I threw it away."</p>
+<p>"Why?"</p>
+<p>"It was Friday."</p>
+<p>Just to the extent that man has freed himself from the dominion
+of ghosts he has advanced. Just to the extent that he has freed
+himself from the tyrants of his own creation he has progressed.
+Just to the extent that he has investigated for himself he has lost
+confidence in superstition.</p>
+<p>With knowledge obedience becomes intelligent
+acquiescence&mdash;it is no longer degrading. Acquiescence in the
+understood&mdash;in the known&mdash;is the act of a sovereign, not
+of a slave. It ennobles, it does not degrade.</p>
+<p>Man has found that he must give liberty to others in order to
+have it himself. He has found that a master is also a
+slave;&mdash;that a tyrant is himself a serf. He has found that
+governments should be founded and administered by man and for man;
+that the rights of all are equal; that the powers that be are not
+ordained by God; that woman is at least the equal of man; that men
+existed before books; that religion is one of the phases of thought
+through which the world is passing; that all creeds were made by
+man; that everything is natural; that a miracle is an
+impossibility; that we know nothing of origin and destiny; that
+concerning the unknown we are all equally ignorant; that the pew
+has the right to contradict what the pulpit asserts; that man is
+responsible only to himself and those he injures, and that all have
+a right to think.</p>
+<p>True religion must be free. Without perfect liberty of the mind
+there can be no true religion. Without liberty the brain is a
+dungeon&mdash;the mind a convict. The slave may bow and cringe and
+crawl, but he cannot adore&mdash;he cannot love.</p>
+<p>True religion is the perfume of a free and grateful heart. True
+religion is a subordination of the passions to the perceptions of
+the intellect. True religion is not a theory&mdash;it is a
+practice. It is not a creed&mdash;it is a life.</p>
+<p>A theory that is afraid of investigation is undeserving a place
+in the human mind.</p>
+<p>I do not pretend to tell what all the truth is. I do not pretend
+to have fathomed the abyss, nor to have floated on outstretched
+wings level with the dim heights of thought. I simply plead for
+freedom. I denounce the cruelties and horrors of slavery. I ask for
+light and air for the souls of men. I say, take off those
+chains&mdash;break those manacles&mdash;free those
+limbs&mdash;release that brain! I plead for the right to
+think&mdash;to reason&mdash;to investigate. I ask that the future
+may be enriched with the honest thoughts of men. I implore every
+human being to be a soldier in the army of progress.</p>
+<p>I will not invade the rights of others. You have no right to
+erect your toll-gate upon the highways of thought. You have no
+right to leap from the hedges of superstition and strike down the
+pioneers of the human race. You have no right to sacrifice the
+liberties of man upon the altars of ghosts. Believe what you may;
+preach what you desire; have all the forms and ceremonies you
+please; exercise your liberty in your own way but extend to all
+others the same right.</p>
+<p>I will not attack your doctrines nor your creeds if they accord
+liberty to me. If they hold thought to be dangerous&mdash;if they
+aver that doubt is a crime, then I attack them one and all, because
+they enslave the minds of men.</p>
+<p>I attack the monsters, the phantoms of imagination that have
+ruled the world. I attack slavery. I ask for room&mdash;room for
+the human mind.</p>
+<p>Why should we sacrifice a real world that we have, for one we
+know not of? Why should we enslave ourselves? Why should we forge
+fetters for our own hands? Why should we be the slaves of phantoms.
+The darkness of barbarism was the womb of these shadows. In the
+light of science they cannot cloud the sky forever. They have
+reddened the hands of man with innocent blood. They made the cradle
+a curse, and the grave a place of torment.</p>
+<p>They blinded the eyes and stopped the ears of the human race.
+They subverted all ideas of justice by promising infinite rewards
+for finite virtues, and threatening infinite punishment for finite
+offences.</p>
+<p>They filled the future with heavens and with hells, with the
+shining peaks of selfish joy and the lurid abysses of flame. For
+ages they kept the world in ignorance and awe, in want and misery,
+in fear and chains.</p>
+<p>I plead for light, for air, for opportunity. I plead for
+individual independence. I plead for the rights of labor and of
+thought. I plead for a chainless future. Let the ghosts
+go&mdash;justice remains. Let them disappear&mdash;men and women
+and children are left. Let the monsters fade away&mdash;the world
+is here with its hills and seas and plains, with its seasons of
+smiles and frowns, its spring of leaf and bud, its summer of shade
+and flower and murmuring stream; its autumn with the laden boughs,
+when the withered banners of the corn are still, and gathered
+fields are growing strangely wan; while death, poetic death, with
+hands that color what they touch, weaves in the Autumn wood her
+tapestries of gold and brown.</p>
+<p>The world remains with its winters and homes and firesides,
+where grow and bloom the virtues of our race. All these are left;
+and music, with its sad and thrilling voice, and all there is of
+art and song and hope and love and aspiration high. All these
+remain. Let the ghosts go&mdash;we will worship them no more.</p>
+<p>Man is greater than these phantoms. Humanity is grander than all
+the creeds, than all the books. Humanity is the great sea, and
+these creeds, and books, and religions, are but the waves of a day.
+Humanity is the sky, and these religions and dogmas and theories
+are but the mists and clouds changing continually, destined finally
+to melt away.</p>
+<p>That which is founded upon slavery, and fear, and ignorance,
+cannot endure. In the religion of the future there will be men and
+women and children, all the aspirations of the soul, and all the
+tender humanities of the heart.</p>
+<p>Let the ghosts go. We will worship them no more. Let them cover
+their eyeless sockets with their fleshless hands and fade forever
+from the imaginations of men.</p>
+<a name="link0009"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>THE LIBERTY OF MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD.</h2>
+<h3>Liberty sustains the same Relation to Mind that Space does to
+Matter.</h3>
+<p>THERE is no slavery but ignorance. Liberty is the child of
+intelligence.</p>
+<p>The history of man is simply the history of slavery, of
+injustice and brutality, together with the means by which he has,
+through the dead and desolate years, slowly and painfully advanced.
+He has been the sport and prey of priest and king, the food of
+superstition and cruel might. Crowned force has governed ignorance
+through fear. Hypocrisy and tyranny&mdash;two vultures&mdash;have
+fed upon the liberties of man. From all these there has been, and
+is, but one means of escape&mdash;intellectual development. Upon
+the back of industry has been the whip. Upon the brain have been
+the fetters of superstition. Nothing has been left undone by the
+enemies of freedom. Every art and artifice, every cruelty and
+outrage has been practiced and perpetrated to destroy the rights of
+man. In this great struggle every crime has been rewarded and every
+virtue has been punished. Reading, writing, thinking and
+investigating have all been crimes.</p>
+<p>Every science has been an outcast.</p>
+<p>All the altars and all the thrones united to arrest the forward
+march of the human race. The king said that mankind must not work
+for themselves. The priest said that mankind must not think for
+themselves. One forged chains for the hands, the other for the
+soul. Under this infamous <i>regime</i> the eagle of the human
+intellect was for ages a slimy serpent of hypocrisy.</p>
+<p>The human race was imprisoned. Through some of the prison bars
+came a few struggling rays of light. Against these bars Science
+pressed its pale and thoughtful face, wooed by the holy dawn of
+human advancement. Bar after bar was broken away. A few grand men
+escaped and devoted their lives to the liberation of their
+fellows.</p>
+<p>Only a few years ago there was a great awakening of the human
+mind. Men began to inquire by what right a crowned robber made them
+work for him? The man who asked this question was called a traitor.
+Others asked by what right does a robed hypocrite rule my thought?
+Such men were called infidels. The priest said, and the king said,
+where is this spirit of investigation to stop? They said then and
+they say now, that it is dangerous for man to be free. I deny it.
+Out on the intellectual sea there is room enough for every sail. In
+the intellectual air there is space enough for every wing.</p>
+<p>The man who does not do his own thinking is a slave, and is a
+traitor to himself and to his fellow-men.</p>
+<p>Every man should stand under the blue and stars, under the
+infinite flag of nature, the peer of every other man.</p>
+<p>Standing in the presence of the Unknown, all have the same right
+to think, and all are equally interested in the great questions of
+origin and destiny. All I claim, all I plead for, is liberty of
+thought and expression. That is all. I do not pretend to tell what
+is absolutely true, but what I think is true. I do not pretend to
+tell all the truth.</p>
+<p>I do not claim that I have floated level with the heights of
+thought, or that I have descended to the very depths of things. I
+simply claim that what ideas I have, I have a right to express; and
+that any man who denies that right to me is an intellectual thief
+and robber. That is all.</p>
+<p>Take those chains from the human soul. Break those fetters. If I
+have no right to think, why have I a brain? If I have no such
+right, have three or four men, or any number, who may get together,
+and sign a creed, and build a house, and put a steeple upon it, and
+a bell in it&mdash;have they the right to think? The good men, the
+good women are tired of the whip and lash in the realm of thought.
+They remember the chain and fagot with a shudder. They are free,
+and they give liberty to others. Whoever claims any right that he
+is unwilling to accord to his fellow-men is dishonest and
+infamous.</p>
+<p>In the good old times, our fathers had the idea that they could
+make people believe to suit them. Our ancestors, in the ages that
+are gone, really believed that by force you could convince a man.
+You cannot change the conclusion of the brain by torture; nor by
+social ostracism. But I will tell you what you can do by these, and
+what you have done. You can make hypocrites by the million. You can
+make a man say that he has changed his mind; but he remains of the
+same opinion still. Put fetters all over him; crush his feet in
+iron boots; stretch him to the last gasp upon the holy rack; burn
+him, if you please, but his ashes will be of the same opinion
+still.</p>
+<p>Our fathers in the good old times&mdash;and the best thing I can
+say about them is, that they have passed away&mdash;had an idea
+that they could force men to think their way. That idea is still
+prevalent in many parts, even of this country. Even in our day some
+extremely religious people say, "We will not trade with that man;
+we will not vote for him; we will not hire him if he is a lawyer;
+we will die before we will take his medicine if he is a doctor; we
+will not invite him to dinner; we will socially ostracise him; he
+must come to our church; he must believe our doctrines; he must
+worship our god or we will not in any way contribute to his
+support."</p>
+<p>In the old times of which I have spoken, they desired to make
+all men think exactly alike. All the mechanical ingenuity of the
+world cannot make two clocks run exactly alike, and how are you
+going to make hundreds of millions of people, differing in brain
+and disposition, in education and aspiration, in conditions and
+surroundings, each clad in a living robe of passionate
+flesh&mdash;how are you going to make them think and feel alike? If
+there is an infinite god, one who made us, and wishes us to think
+alike, why did he give a spoonful of brains to one, and a
+magnificent intellectual development to another? Why is it that we
+have all degrees of intelligence, from orthodoxy to genius, if it
+was intended that all should think and feel alike?</p>
+<p>I used to read in books how our fathers persecuted mankind. But
+I never appreciated it. I read it, but it did not burn itself into
+my soul. I did not really appreciate the infamies that have been
+committed in the name of religion, until I saw the iron arguments
+that Christians used. I saw the Thumbscrew&mdash;two little pieces
+of iron, armed on the inner surfaces with protuberances, to prevent
+their slipping; through each end a screw uniting the two pieces.
+And when some man denied the efficacy of baptism, or may be said,
+"I do not believe that a fish ever swallowed a man to keep him from
+drowning," then they put his thumb between these pieces of iron and
+in the name of love and universal forgiveness, began to screw these
+pieces together. When this was done most men said, "I will recant."
+Probably I should have done the same. Probably I would have said:
+"Stop; I will admit anything that you wish; I will admit that there
+is one god or a million, one hell or a billion; suit yourselves;
+but stop."</p>
+<p>But there was now and then a man who would not swerve the
+breadth of a hair. There was now and then some sublime heart,
+willing to die for an intellectual conviction. Had it not been for
+such men, we would be savages to-night. Had it not been for a few
+brave, heroic souls in every age, we would have been cannibals,
+with pictures of wild beasts tattooed upon our flesh, dancing
+around some dried snake fetich.</p>
+<p>Let us thank every good and noble man who stood so grandly, so
+proudly, in spite of opposition, of hatred and death, for what he
+believed to be the truth.</p>
+<p>Heroism did not excite the respect of our fathers. The man who
+would not recant was not forgiven. They screwed the thumbscrews
+down to the last pang, and then threw their victim into some
+dungeon, where, in the throbbing silence and darkness, he might
+suffer the agonies of the fabled damned. This was done in the name
+of love&mdash;in the name of mercy&mdash;in the name of the
+compassionate Christ.</p>
+<p>I saw, too, what they called the Collar of Torture. Imagine a
+circle of iron, and on the inside a hundred points almost as sharp
+as needles. This argument was fastened about the throat of the
+sufferer. Then he could not walk, nor sit down, nor stir without
+the neck being punctured, by these points. In a little while the
+throat would begin to swell, and suffocation would end the agonies
+of that man. This man, it may be, had committed the crime of
+saying, with tears upon his cheeks, "I do not believe that God, the
+father of us all, will damn to eternal perdition any of the
+children of men."</p>
+<p>I saw another instrument, called the Scavenger's Daughter. Think
+of a pair of shears with handles, not only where they now are, but
+at the points as well, and just above the pivot that unites the
+blades, a circle of iron. In the upper handles the hands would be
+placed; in the lower, the feet; and through the iron ring, at the
+centre, the head of the victim would be forced. In this condition,
+he would be thrown prone upon the earth, and the strain upon the
+muscles produced such agony that insanity would in pity end his
+pain.</p>
+<p>This was done by gentlemen who said: "Whosoever smiteth thee
+upon one cheek turn to him the other also."</p>
+<p>I saw the Rack. This was a box like the bed of a wagon, with a
+windlass at each end, with levers, and ratchets to prevent
+slipping; over each windlass went chains; some were fastened to the
+ankles of the sufferer; others to his wrists. And then priests,
+clergymen, divines, saints, began turning these windlasses, and
+kept turning, until the ankles, the knees, the hips, the shoulders,
+the elbows, the wrists of the victim were all dislocated, and the
+sufferer was wet with the sweat of agony. And they had standing by
+a physician to feel his pulse. What for? To save his life? Yes. In
+mercy? No; simply that they might rack him once again.</p>
+<p>This was done, remember, in the name of civilization; in the
+name of law and order; in the name of mercy; in the name of
+religion; in the name of the most merciful Christ.</p>
+<p>Sometimes, when I read and think about these frightful things,
+it seems to me that I have suffered all these horrors myself. It
+seems sometimes, as though I had stood upon the shore of exile and
+gazed with tearful eyes toward home and native land; as though my
+nails had been torn from my hands, and into the bleeding quick
+needles had been thrust; as though my feet had been crushed in iron
+boots; as though I had been chained in the cell of the Inquisition
+and listened with dying ears for the coming footsteps of release;
+as though I had stood upon the scaffold and had seen the glittering
+axe fall upon me; as though I had been upon the rack and had seen,
+bending above me, the white faces of hypocrite priests; as though I
+had been taken from my fireside, from my wife and children, taken
+to the public square, chained; as though fagots had been piled
+about me; as though the flames had climbed around my limbs and
+scorched my eyes to blindness, and as though my ashes had been
+scattered to the four winds, by all the countless hands of hate.
+And when I so feel, I swear that while I live I will do what little
+I can to preserve and to augment the liberties of man, woman, and
+child.</p>
+<p>It is a question of justice, of mercy, of honesty, of
+intellectual development. If there is a man in the world who is not
+willing to give to every human being every right he claims for
+himself, he is just so much nearer a barbarian than I am. It is a
+question of honesty. The man who is not willing to give to every
+other the same intellectual rights he claims for himself, is
+dishonest, selfish, and brutal.</p>
+<p>It is a question of intellectual development. Whoever holds
+another man responsible for his honest thought, has a deformed and
+distorted brain. It is a question of intellectual development.</p>
+<p>A little while ago I saw models of nearly everything that man
+has made. I saw models of all the water craft, from the rude
+dug-out in which floated a naked savage&mdash;one of our
+ancestors&mdash;a naked savage, with teeth two inches in length,
+with a spoonful of brains in the back of his head&mdash;I saw
+models of all the water craft of the world, from that dug-out up to
+a man-of-war, that carries a hundred guns and miles of
+canvas&mdash;from that dug-out to the steamship that turns its
+brave prow from the port of New York, with a compass like a
+conscience, crossing three thousand miles of billows without
+missing a throb or beat of its mighty iron heart.</p>
+<p>I saw at the same time the weapons that man has made, from a
+club, such as was grasped by that same savage, when he crawled from
+his den in the ground and hunted a snake for his dinner; from that
+club to the boomerang, to the sword, to the cross-bow, to the
+blunderbuss, to the flint-lock, to the cap-lock, to the needle-gun,
+up to a cannon cast by Krupp, capable of hurling a ball weighing
+two thousand pounds through eighteen inches of solid steel.</p>
+<p>I saw, too, the armor from the shell of a turtle, that one of
+our brave ancestors lashed upon his breast when he went to fight
+for his country; the skin of a porcupine, dried with the quills on,
+which this same savage pulled over his orthodox head, up to the
+shirts of mail, that were worn in the Middle Ages, that laughed at
+the edge of the sword and defied the point of the spear; up to a
+monitor clad in complete steel.</p>
+<p>I saw at the same time, their musical instruments, from the
+tom-tom&mdash;that is, a hoop with a couple of strings of raw hide
+drawn across it&mdash;from that tom-tom, up to the instruments we
+have to-day, that make the common air blossom with melody.</p>
+<p>I saw, too, their paintings, from a daub of yellow mud, to the
+great works which now adorn the galleries of the world. I saw also
+their sculpture, from the rude god with four legs, a half dozen
+arms, several noses, and two or three rows of ears, and one little,
+contemptible, brainless head, up to the figures of to-day&mdash;to
+the marbles that genius has clad in such a personality that it
+seems almost impudent to touch them without an introduction.</p>
+<p>I saw their books&mdash;books written upon skins of wild
+beasts&mdash;upon shoulder-blades of sheep&mdash;books written upon
+leaves, upon bark, up to the splendid volumes that enrich the
+libraries of our day. When I speak of libraries, I think of the
+remark of Plato: "A house that has a library in it has a soul."</p>
+<p>I saw their implements of agriculture, from a crooked stick that
+was attached to the horn of an ox by some twisted straw, to the
+agricultural implements of this generation, that make it possible
+for a man to cultivate the soil without being an ignoramus.</p>
+<p>While looking upon these things I was forced to say that man
+advanced only as he mingled his thought with his labor,&mdash;only
+as he got into partnership with the forces of nature,&mdash;only as
+he learned to take advantage of his surroundings&mdash;only as he
+freed himself from the bondage of fear,&mdash;only as he depended
+upon himself&mdash;only as he lost confidence in the gods.</p>
+<p>I saw at the same time a row of human skulls, from the lowest
+skull that has been found, the Neanderthal skull&mdash;skulls from
+Central Africa, skulls from the Bushmen of Australia&mdash;skulls
+from the farthest isles of the Pacific sea&mdash;up to the best
+skulls of the last generation;&mdash;and I noticed that there was
+the same difference between those skulls that there was between the
+products of those skulls, and I said to myself, "After all, it is a
+simple question of intellectual development." There was the same
+difference between those skulls, the lowest and highest skulls,
+that there was between the dug-out and the man-of-war and the
+steamship, between the club and the Krupp gun, between the yellow
+daub and the landscape, between the tom-tom and an opera by
+Verdi.</p>
+<p>The first and lowest skull in this row was the den in which
+crawled the base and meaner instincts of mankind, and the last was
+a temple in which dwelt joy, liberty, and love.</p>
+<p>It is all a question of brain, of intellectual development.</p>
+<p>If we are nearer free than were our fathers, it is because we
+have better heads upon the average, and more brains in them.</p>
+<p>Now, I ask you to be honest with me. It makes no difference to
+you what I believe, nor what I wish to prove. I simply ask you to
+be honest. Divest your minds, for a moment at least, of all
+religious prejudice. Act, for a few moments, as though you were men
+and women.</p>
+<p>Suppose the king, if there was one, and the priest, if there was
+one, at the time this gentleman floated in the dug-out, and charmed
+his ears with the music of the tom-tom, had said: "That dug-out is
+the best boat that ever can be built by man; the pattern of that
+came from on high, from the great god of storm and flood, and any
+man who says that he can improve it by putting a mast in it, with a
+sail upon it, is an infidel, and shall be burned at the stake;"
+what, in your judgment&mdash;honor bright&mdash;would have been the
+effect upon the circumnavigation of the globe?</p>
+<p>Suppose the king, if there was one, and the priest, if there was
+one&mdash;and I presume there was a priest, because it was a very
+ignorant age&mdash;suppose this king and priest had said: "That
+tom-tom is the most beautiful instrument of music of which any man
+can conceive; that is the kind of music they have in heaven; an
+angel sitting upon the edge of a fleecy cloud, golden in the
+setting sun, playing upon that tom-tom, became so enraptured, so
+entranced with her own music, that in a kind of ecstasy she dropped
+it&mdash;that is how we obtained it; and any man who says that it
+can be improved by putting a back and front to it, and four
+strings, and a bridge, and getting a bow of hair with rosin, is a
+blaspheming wretch, and shall die the death,"&mdash;I ask you, what
+effect would that have had upon music? If that course had been
+pursued, would the human ears, in your judgment, ever have been
+enriched with the divine symphonies of Beethoven?</p>
+<p>Suppose the king, if there was one, and the priest, had said:
+"That crooked stick is the best plow that can be invented: the
+pattern of that plow was given to a pious farmer in a holy dream,
+and that twisted straw is the <i>ne plus ultra</i> of all twisted
+things, and any man who says he can make an improvement upon that
+plow, is an atheist;" what, in your judgment, would have been the
+effect upon the science of agriculture?</p>
+<p>But the people said, and the king and priest said: "We want
+better weapons with which to kill our fellow-Christians; we want
+better plows, better music, better paintings, and whoever will give
+us better weapons, and better music, better houses to live in,
+better clothes, we will robe him in wealth, and crown him with
+honor." Every incentive was held out to every human being to
+improve these things. That is the reason the club has been changed
+to a cannon, the dug-out to a steamship, the daub to a painting;
+that is the reason that the piece of rough and broken stone finally
+became a glorified statue.</p>
+<p>You must not, however, forget that the gentleman in the dug-out,
+the gentleman who was enraptured with the music of the tom-tom, and
+cultivated his land with a crooked stick, had a religion of his
+own. That gentlemen in the dug-out was orthodox. He was never
+troubled with doubts. He lived and died settled in his mind. He
+believed in hell; and he thought he would be far happier in heaven,
+if he could just lean over and see certain people who expressed
+doubts as to the truth of his creed, gently but everlastingly
+broiled and burned.</p>
+<p>It is a very sad and unhappy fact that this man has had a great
+many intellectual descendants. It is also an unhappy fact in
+nature, that the ignorant multiply much faster than the
+intellectual. This fellow in the dug-out believed in a personal
+devil. His devil had a cloven hoof, a long tail, armed with a fiery
+dart; and his devil breathed brimstone. This devil was at least the
+equal of God; not quite so stout but a little shrewder. And do you
+know there has not been a patentable improvement made upon that
+devil for six thousand years.</p>
+<p>This gentleman in the dug-out believed that God was a tyrant;
+that he would eternally damn the man who lived in accordance with
+his highest and grandest ideal. He believed that the earth was
+flat. He believed in a literal, burning, seething hell of fire and
+sulphur. He had also his idea of politics; and his doctrine was,
+might makes right. And it will take thousands of years before the
+world will reverse this doctrine, and believingly say, "Right makes
+might."</p>
+<p>All I ask is the same privilege to improve upon that gentleman's
+theology as upon his musical instrument; the same right to improve
+upon his politics as upon his dug-out. That is all. I ask for the
+human soul the same liberty in every direction. That is the only
+crime I have committed. I say, let us think. Let each one express
+his thought. Let us become investigators, not followers, not
+cringers and crawlers. If there is in heaven an infinite being, he
+never will be satisfied with the worship of cowards and hypocrites.
+Honest unbelief, honest infidelity, honest atheism, will be a
+perfume in heaven when pious hypocrisy, no matter how religious it
+may be outwardly, will be a stench.</p>
+<p>This is my doctrine: Give every other human being every right
+you claim for yourself. Keep your mind open to the influences of
+nature. Receive new thoughts with hospitality. Let us advance.</p>
+<p>The religionist of to-day wants the ship of his soul to lie at
+the wharf of orthodoxy and rot in the sun. He delights to hear the
+sails of old opinions flap against the masts of old creeds. He
+loves to see the joints and the sides open and gape in the sun, and
+it is a kind of bliss for him to repeat again and again: "Do not
+disturb my opinions. Do not unsettle my mind; I have it all made
+up, and I want no infidelity. Let me go backward rather than
+forward."</p>
+<p>As far as I am concerned I wish to be out on the high seas. I
+wish to take my chances with wind, and wave, and star. And I had
+rather go down in the glory and grandeur of the storm, than to rot
+in any orthodox harbor whatever.</p>
+<p>After all, we are improving from age to age. The most orthodox
+people in this country two hundred years ago would have been burned
+for the crime of heresy. The ministers who denounce me for
+expressing my thought would have been in the Inquisition
+themselves. Where once burned and blazed the bivouac fires of the
+army of progress, now glow the altars of the church. The
+religionists of our time are occupying about the same ground
+occupied by heretics and infidels of one hundred years ago. The
+church has advanced in spite, as it were, of itself. It has
+followed the army of progress protesting and denouncing, and had to
+keep within protesting and denouncing distance. If the church had
+not made great progress I could not express my thoughts.</p>
+<p>Man, however, has advanced just exactly in the proportion with
+which he has mingled his thought with his labor. The sailor,
+without control of the wind and wave, knowing nothing or very
+little of the mysterious currents and pulses of the sea, is
+superstitious. So also is the agriculturist, whose prosperity
+depends upon something he cannot control. But the mechanic, when a
+wheel refuses to turn, never thinks of dropping on his knees and
+asking the assistance of some divine power. He knows there is a
+reason. He knows that something is too large or too small; that
+there is something wrong with his machine; and he goes to work and
+he makes it larger or smaller, here or there, until the wheel will
+turn. Now, just in proportion as man gets away from being, as it
+were, the slave of his surroundings, the serf of the
+elements,&mdash;of the heat, the frost, the snow, and the
+lightning,&mdash;just to the extent that he has gotten control of
+his own destiny, just to the extent that he has triumphed over the
+obstacles of nature, he has advanced physically and intellectually.
+As man develops, he places a greater value upon his own rights.
+Liberty becomes a grander and diviner thing. As he values his own
+rights, he begins to value the rights of others. And when all men
+give to all others all the rights they claim for themselves, this
+world will be civilized.</p>
+<p>A few years ago the people were afraid to question the king,
+afraid to question the priest, afraid to investigate a creed,
+afraid to deny a book, afraid to denounce a dogma, afraid to
+reason, afraid to think. Before wealth they bowed to the very
+earth, and in the presence of titles they became abject. All this
+is slowly but surely changing. We no longer bow to men simply
+because they are rich. Our fathers worshiped the golden calf. The
+worst you can say of an American now is, he worships the gold of
+the calf. Even the calf is beginning to see this distinction.</p>
+<p>It no longer satisfies the ambition of a great man to be king or
+emperor. The last Napoleon was not satisfied with being the emperor
+of the French. He was not satisfied with having a circlet of gold
+about his head. He wanted some evidence that he had something of
+value within his head. So he wrote the life of Julius C&aelig;sar,
+that he might become a member of the French Academy. The emperors,
+the kings, the popes, no longer tower above their fellows. Compare
+King William with the philosopher Haeckel. The king is one of the
+anointed by the most high, as they claim&mdash;one upon whose head
+has been poured the divine petroleum of authority. Compare this
+king with Haeckel, who towers an intellectual colossus above the
+crowned mediocrity. Compare George Eliot with Queen Victoria. The
+Queen is clothed in garments given her by blind fortune and
+unreasoning chance, while George Eliot wears robes of glory woven
+in the loom of her own genius.</p>
+<p>The world is beginning to pay homage to intellect, to genius, to
+heart.</p>
+<p>We have advanced. We have reaped the benefit of every sublime
+and heroic self-sacrifice, of every divine and brave act; and we
+should endeavor to hand the torch to the next generation, having
+added a little to the intensity and glory of the flame.</p>
+<p>When I think of how much this world has suffered; when I think
+of how long our fathers were slaves, of how they cringed and
+crawled at the foot of the throne, and in the dust of the altar, of
+how they abased themselves, of how abjectly they stood in the
+presence of superstition robed and crowned, I am amazed.</p>
+<p>This world has not been fit for a man to live in fifty years. It
+was not until the year 1808 that Great Britain abolished the slave
+trade. Up to that time her judges, sitting upon the bench in the
+name of justice, her priests, occupying her pulpits, in the name of
+universal love, owned stock in the slave ships, and luxuriated upon
+the profits of piracy and murder. It was not until the same year
+that the United States of America abolished the slave trade between
+this and other countries, but carefully preserved it as between the
+States. It was not until the 28th day of August, 1833, that Great
+Britain abolished human slavery in her colonies; and it was not
+until the 1st day of January, 1863, that Abraham Lincoln, sustained
+by the sublime and heroic North, rendered our flag pure as the sky
+in which it floats.</p>
+<p>Abraham Lincoln was, in my judgment, in many respects, the
+grandest man ever President of the United States. Upon his monument
+these words should be written: "Here sleeps the only man in the
+history of the world, who, having been clothed with almost absolute
+power, never abused it, except upon the side of mercy."</p>
+<p>Think how long we clung to the institution of human slavery, how
+long lashes upon the naked back were a legal tender for labor
+performed. Think of it. The pulpit of this country deliberately and
+willingly, for a hundred years, turned the cross of Christ into a
+whipping post.</p>
+<p>With every drop of my blood I hate and execrate every form of
+tyranny, every form of slavery. I hate dictation. I love
+liberty.</p>
+<p>What do I mean by liberty? By physical liberty I mean the right
+to do anything which does not interfere with the happiness of
+another. By intellectual liberty I mean the right to think right
+and the right to think wrong. Thought is the means by which we
+endeavor to arrive at truth. If we know the truth already, we need
+not think. All that can be required is honesty of purpose. You ask
+my opinion about anything; I examine it honestly, and when my mind
+is made up, what should I tell you? Should I tell you my real
+thought? What should I do? There is a book put in my hands. I am
+told this is the Koran; it was written by inspiration. I read it,
+and when I get through, suppose that I think in my heart and in my
+brain, that it is utterly untrue, and you then ask me, what do you
+think? Now, admitting that I live in Turkey, and have no chance to
+get any office unless I am on the side of the Koran, what should I
+say? Should I make a clean breast and say, that upon my honor I do
+not believe it? What would you think then of my fellow-citizens if
+they said: "That man is dangerous, he is dishonest."</p>
+<p>Suppose I read the book called the Bible, and when I get through
+I make up my mind that it was written by men. A minister asks me,
+"Did you read the Bible?" I answer, that I did. "Do you think it
+divinely inspired?" What should I reply? Should I say to myself,
+"If I deny the inspiration of the Scriptures, the people will never
+clothe me with power." What ought I to answer? Ought I not to say
+like a man: "I have read it; I do not believe it." Should I not
+give the real transcript of my mind? Or should I turn hypocrite and
+pretend what I do not feel, and hate myself forever after for being
+a cringing coward. For my part I would rather a man would tell me
+what he honestly thinks. I would rather he would preserve his
+manhood. I had a thousand times rather be a manly unbeliever than
+an unmanly believer. And if there is a judgment day, a time when
+all will stand before some supreme being, I believe I will stand
+higher, and stand a better chance of getting my case decided in my
+favor, than any man sneaking through life pretending to believe
+what he does not.</p>
+<p>I have made up my mind to say my say. I shall do it kindly,
+distinctly; but I am going to do it. I know there are thousands of
+men who substantially agree with me, but who are not in a condition
+to express their thoughts. They are poor; they are in business; and
+they know that should they tell their honest thought, persons will
+refuse to patronize them&mdash;to trade with them; they wish to get
+bread for their little children; they wish to take care of their
+wives; they wish to have homes and the comforts of life. Every such
+person is a certificate of the meanness of the community in which
+he resides. And yet I do not blame these people for not expressing
+their thought. I say to them: "Keep your ideas to yourselves; feed
+and clothe the ones you love; I will do your talking for you. The
+church can not touch, can not crush, can not starve, cannot stop or
+stay me; I will express your thoughts."</p>
+<p>As an excuse for tyranny, as a justification of slavery, the
+church has taught that man is totally depraved. Of the truth of
+that doctrine, the church has furnished the only evidence there is.
+The truth is, we are both good and bad. The worst are capable of
+some good deeds, and the best are capable of bad. The lowest can
+rise, and the highest may fall. That mankind can be divided into
+two great classes, sinners and saints, is an utter falsehood. In
+times of great disaster, called it may be, by the despairing voices
+of women, men, denounced by the church as totally depraved, rush to
+death as to a festival. By such men, deeds are done so filled with
+self-sacrifice and generous daring, that millions pay to them the
+tribute, not only of admiration, but of tears. Above all creeds,
+above all religions, after all, is that divine
+thing,&mdash;Humanity; and now and then in shipwreck on the wide,
+wild sea, or 'mid the rocks and breakers of some cruel shore, or
+where the serpents of flame writhe and hiss, some glorious heart,
+some chivalric soul does a deed that glitters like a star, and
+gives the lie to all the dogmas of superstition. All these
+frightful doctrines have been used to degrade and to enslave
+mankind.</p>
+<p>Away, forever away with the creeds and books and forms and laws
+and religions that take from the soul liberty and reason. Down with
+the idea that thought is dangerous! Perish the infamous doctrine
+that man can have property in man. Let us resent with indignation
+every effort to put a chain upon our minds. If there is no God,
+certainly we should not bow and cringe and crawl. If there is a
+God, there should be no slaves.</p>
+<a name="link0010"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>LIBERTY OF WOMAN.</h2>
+<p>Women have been the slaves of slaves; and in my judgment it took
+millions of ages for woman to come from the condition of abject
+slavery up to the institution of marriage. Let me say right here,
+that I regard marriage as the holiest institution among men.
+Without the fireside there is no human advancement; without the
+family relation there is no life worth living. Every good
+government is made up of good families. The unit of good government
+is the family, and anything that tends to destroy the family is
+perfectly devilish and infamous. I believe in marriage, and I hold
+in utter contempt the opinions of those long-haired men and
+short-haired women who denounce the institution of marriage.</p>
+<p>The grandest ambition that any man can possibly have, is to so
+live, and so improve himself in heart and brain, as to be worthy of
+the love of some splendid woman; and the grandest ambition of any
+girl is to make herself worthy of the love and adoration of some
+magnificent man. That is my idea. There is no success in life
+without love and marriage. You had better be the emperor of one
+loving and tender heart, and she the empress of yours, than to be
+king of the world. The man who has really won the love of one good
+woman in this world, I do not care if he dies in the ditch a
+beggar, his life has been a success.</p>
+<p>I say it took millions of years to come from the condition of
+abject slavery up to the condition of marriage. Ladies, the
+ornaments you wear upon your persons to-night are but the souvenirs
+of your mother's bondage. The chains around your necks, and the
+bracelets clasped upon your white arms by the thrilled hand of
+love, have been changed by the wand of civilization from iron to
+shining, glittering gold.</p>
+<p>But nearly every religion has accounted for all the devilment in
+this world by the crime of woman. What a gallant thing that is! And
+if it is true, I had rather live with the woman I love in a world
+full of trouble, than to live in heaven with nobody but men.</p>
+<p>I read in a book&mdash;and I will say now that I cannot give the
+exact language, as my memory does not retain the words, but I can
+give the substance&mdash;I read in a book that the Supreme Being
+concluded to make a world and one man; that he took some nothing
+and made a world and one man, and put this man in a garden. In a
+little while he noticed that the man got lonesome; that he wandered
+around as if he was waiting for a train. There was nothing to
+interest him; no news; no papers; no politics; no policy; and, as
+the devil had not yet made his appearance, there was no chance for
+reconciliation; not even for civil service reform. Well, he
+wandered about the garden in this condition, until finally the
+Supreme Being made up his mind to make him a companion.</p>
+<p>Having used up all the nothing he originally took in making the
+world and one man, he had to take a part of the man to start a
+woman with. So he caused a sleep to fall on this man&mdash;now
+understand me, I do not say this story is true. After the sleep
+fell upon this man, the Supreme Being took a rib, or as the French
+would call it, a cutlet, out of this man, and from that he made a
+woman. And considering the amount of raw material used, I look upon
+it as the most successful job ever performed. Well, after he got
+the woman done, she was brought to the man; not to see how she
+liked him, but to see how he liked her. He liked her, and they
+started housekeeping; and they were told of certain things they
+might do and of one thing they could not do&mdash;and of course
+they did it. I would have done it in fifteen minutes, and I know
+it. There wouldn't have been an apple on that tree half an hour
+from date, and the limbs would have been full of clubs. And then
+they were turned out of the park and extra policemen were put on to
+keep them from getting back.</p>
+<p>Devilment commenced. The mumps, and the measles, and the
+whooping-cough, and the scarlet fever started in their race for
+man. They began to have the toothache, roses began to have thorns,
+snakes began to have poisoned teeth, and people began to divide
+about religion and politics, and the world has been full of trouble
+from that day to this.</p>
+<p>Nearly all of the religions of this world account for the
+existence of evil by such a story as that!</p>
+<p>I read in another book what appeared to be an account of the
+same transaction. It was written about four thousand years before
+the other. All commentators agree that the one that was written
+last was the original, and that the one that was written first was
+copied from the one that was written last. But I would advise you
+all not to allow your creed to be disturbed by a little matter of
+four or five thousand years. In this other story, Brahma made up
+his mind to make the world and a man and woman. He made the world,
+and he made the man and then the woman, and put them on the island
+of Ceylon. According to the account it was the most beautiful
+island of which man can conceive. Such birds, such songs, such
+flowers and such verdure! And the branches of the trees were so
+arranged that when the wind swept through them every tree was a
+thousand &#65533;?olian harps.</p>
+<p>Brahma, when he put them there, said: "Let them have a period of
+courtship, for it is my desire and will that true love should
+forever precede marriage." When I read that, it was so much more
+beautiful and lofty than the other, that I said to myself, "If
+either one of these stories ever turns out to be true, I hope it
+will be this one."</p>
+<p>Then they had their courtship, with the nightingale singing, and
+the stars shining, and the flowers blooming, and they fell in love.
+Imagine that courtship! No prospective fathers or mothers-in-law;
+no prying and gossiping neighbors; nobody to say, "Young man, how
+do you expect to support her?" Nothing of that kind. They were
+married by the Supreme Brahma, and he said to them: "Remain here;
+you must never leave this island." Well, after a little while the
+man&mdash;and his name was Adami, and the woman's name was
+Heva&mdash;said to Heva: "I believe I'll look about a little." He
+went to the northern extremity of the island where there was a
+little narrow neck of land connecting it with the mainland, and the
+devil, who is always playing pranks with us, produced a mirage, and
+when he looked over to the mainland, such hills and vales, such
+dells and dales, such mountains crowned with snow, such cataracts
+clad in bows of glory did he see there, that he went back and told
+Heva: "The country over there is a thousand times better than this;
+let us migrate." She, like every other woman that ever lived, said:
+"Let well enough alone; we have all we want; let us stay here." But
+he said "No, let us go;" so she followed him, and when they came to
+this narrow neck of land, he took her on his back like a gentleman,
+and carried her over. But the moment they got over they heard a
+crash, and looking back, discovered that this narrow neck of land
+had fallen into the sea. The mirage had disappeared, and there were
+naught but rocks and sand; and then the Supreme Brahma cursed them
+both to the lowest hell.</p>
+<p>Then it was that the man spoke,&mdash;and I have liked him ever
+since for it&mdash;"Curse me, but curse not her, it was not her
+fault, it was mine."</p>
+<p>That's the kind of man to start a world with.</p>
+<p>The Supreme Brahma said: "I will save her, but not thee." And
+then she spoke out of her fullness of love, out of a heart in which
+there was love enough to make all her daughters rich in holy
+affection, and said: "If thou wilt not spare him, spare neither me;
+I do not wish to live without him; I love him." Then the Supreme
+Brahma said&mdash;and I have liked him ever since I read
+it&mdash;"I will spare you both and watch over you and your
+children forever."</p>
+<p>Honor bright, is not that the better and grander story?</p>
+<p>And from that same book I want to show you what ideas some of
+these miserable heathen had; the heathen we are trying to convert.
+We send missionaries over yonder to convert heathen there, and we
+send soldiers out on the plains to kill heathen here. If we can
+convert the heathen, why not convert those nearest home? Why not
+convert those we can get at? Why not convert those who have the
+immense advantage of the example of the average pioneer? But to
+show you the men we are trying to convert: In this book it says:
+"Man is strength, woman is beauty; man is courage, woman is love.
+When the one man loves the one woman and the one woman loves the
+one man, the very angels leave heaven and come and sit in that
+house and sing for joy."</p>
+<p>They are the men we are converting. Think of it! I tell you,
+when I read these things, I say that love is not of any country;
+nobility does not belong exclusively to any race, and through all
+the ages, there have been a few great and tender souls blossoming
+in love and pity.</p>
+<p>In my judgment, the woman is the equal of the man. She has all
+the rights I have and one more, and that is the right to be
+protected. That is my doctrine. You are married; try and make the
+woman you love happy. Whoever marries simply for himself will make
+a mistake; but whoever loves a woman so well that he says "I will
+make her happy," makes no mistake. And so with the woman who says,
+"I will make him happy." There is only one way to be happy, and
+that is to make somebody else so, and you cannot be happy by going
+cross lots; you have got to go the regular turnpike road.</p>
+<p>If there is any man I detest, it is the man who thinks he is the
+head of a family&mdash;the man who thinks he is "boss!" The fellow
+in the dug-out used that word "boss;" that was one of his favorite
+expressions.</p>
+<p>Imagine a young man and a young woman courting, walking out in
+the moonlight, and the nightingale singing a song of pain and love,
+as though the thorn touched her heart&mdash;imagine them stopping
+there in the moonlight and starlight and song, and saying, "Now,
+here, let us settle who is 'boss!'" I tell you it is an infamous
+word and an infamous feeling&mdash;I abhor a man who is "boss," who
+is going to govern in his family, and when he speaks orders all the
+rest to be still as some mighty idea is about to be launched from
+his mouth. Do you know I dislike this man unspeakably?</p>
+<p>I hate above all things a cross man. What right has he to murder
+the sunshine of a day? What right has he to assassinate the joy of
+life?</p>
+<p>When you go home you ought to go like a ray of light&mdash;so
+that it will, even in the night, bursty out of the doors and
+windows and illuminate the darkness. Some men think their mighty
+brains have been in a turmoil; they have been thinking about who
+will be alderman from the fifth ward; they have been thinking about
+politics; great and mighty questions have been engaging their
+minds; they have bought calico at five cents or six, and want to
+sell it for seven. Think of the intellectual strain that must have
+been upon that man, and when he gets home everybody else in the
+house must look out for his comfort. A woman who has only taken
+care of five or six children, and one or two of them sick, has been
+nursing them and singing to them, and trying to make one yard of
+cloth do the work of two, she, of course, is fresh and fine and
+ready to wait upon this gentleman&mdash;the head of the
+family&mdash;the boss!</p>
+<p>Do you know another thing? I despise a stingy man. I do not see
+how it is possible for a man to die worth fifty million of dollars,
+or ten million of dollars, in a city full of want, when he meets
+almost every day the withered hand of beggary and the white lips of
+famine. How a man can withstand all that, and hold in the clutch of
+his greed twenty or thirty million of dollars, is past my
+comprehension. I do not see how he can do it. I should not think he
+could do it any more than he could keep a pile of lumber on the
+beach, where hundreds and thousands of men were drowning in the
+sea.</p>
+<p>Do you know that I have known men who would trust their wives
+with their hearts and their honor but not with their pocketbook;
+not with a dollar. When I see a man of that kind, I always think he
+knows which of these articles is the most valuable. Think of making
+your wife a beggar! Think of her having to ask you every day for a
+dollar, or for two dollars or fifty cents! "What did you do with
+that dollar I gave you last week?" Think of having a wife that is
+afraid of you! What kind of children do you expect to have with a
+beggar and a coward for their mother? Oh, I tell you if you have
+but a dollar in the world, and you have got to spend it, spend it
+like a king; spend it as though it were a dry leaf and you the
+owner of unbounded forests! That's the way to spend it! I had
+rather be a beggar and spend my last dollar like a king, than be a
+king and spend my money like a beggar! If it has got to go, let it
+go!</p>
+<p>Get the best you can for your family&mdash;try to look as well
+as you can yourself. When you used to go courting, how elegantly
+you looked! Ah, your eye was bright, your step was light, and you
+looked like a prince. Do you know that it is insufferable egotism
+in you to suppose a woman is going to love you always looking as
+slovenly as you can! Think of it! Any good woman on earth will be
+true to you forever when you do your level best.</p>
+<p>Some people tell me, "Your doctrine about loving, and wives, and
+all that, is splendid for the rich, but it won't do for the poor."
+I tell you to-night there is more love in the homes of the poor
+than in the palaces of the rich. The meanest hut with love in it is
+a palace fit for the gods, and a palace without love is a den only
+fit for wild beasts. That is my doctrine! You cannot be so poor
+that you cannot help somebody. Good nature is the cheapest
+commodity in the world; and love is the only thing that will pay
+ten per cent, to borrower and lender both. Do not tell me that you
+have got to be rich! We have a false standard of greatness in the
+United States. We think here that a man must be great, that he must
+be notorious; that he must be extremely wealthy, or that his name
+must be upon the putrid lips of rumor. It is all a mistake. It is
+not necessary to be rich or to be great, or to be powerful, to be
+happy. The happy man is the successful man.</p>
+<p>Happiness is the legal tender of the soul.</p>
+<p>Joy is wealth.</p>
+<p>A little while ago, I stood by the grave of the old
+Napoleon&mdash;a magnificent tomb of gilt and gold, fit almost for
+a dead deity&mdash;and gazed upon the sarcophagus of rare and
+nameless marble, where rest at last the ashes of that restless man.
+I leaned over the balustrade and thought about the career of the
+greatest soldier of the modern world.</p>
+<p>I saw him walking upon the banks of the Seine, contemplating
+suicide. I saw him at Toulon&mdash;I saw him putting down the mob
+in the streets of Paris&mdash;I saw him at the head of the army of
+Italy&mdash;I saw him crossing the bridge of Lodi with the
+tri-color in his hand&mdash;I saw him in Egypt in the shadows of
+the pyramids&mdash;I saw him conquer the Alps and mingle the eagles
+of France with the eagles of the crags. I saw him at
+Marengo&mdash;at Ulm and Austerlitz. I saw him in Russia, where the
+infantry of the snow and the cavalry of the wild blast scattered
+his legions like winter's withered leaves. I saw him at Leipsic in
+defeat and disaster&mdash;driven by a million bayonets back upon
+Paris&mdash;clutched like a wild beast&mdash;banished to Elba. I
+saw him escape and retake an empire by the force of his genius. I
+saw him upon the frightful field of Waterloo, where Chance and Fate
+combined to wreck the fortunes of their former king. And I saw him
+at St. Helena, with his hands crossed behind him, gazing out upon
+the sad and solemn sea.</p>
+<p>I thought of the orphans and widows he had made&mdash;of the
+tears that had been shed for his glory, and of the only woman who
+ever loved him, pushed from his heart by the cold hand of ambition.
+And I said I would rather have been a French peasant and worn
+wooden shoes. I would rather have lived in a hut with a vine
+growing over the door, and the grapes growing purple in the kisses
+of the autumn sun. I would rather have been that poor peasant with
+my loving wife by my side, knitting as the day died out of the
+sky&mdash;with my children upon my knees and their arms about
+me&mdash;I would rather have been that man and gone down to the
+tongueless silence of the dreamless dust, than to have been that
+imperial impersonation of force and murder, known as "Napoleon the
+Great."</p>
+<p>It is not necessary to be great to be happy; it is not necessary
+to be rich to be just and generous and to have a heart filled with
+divine affection. No matter whether you are rich or poor, treat
+your wife as though she were a splendid flower, and she will fill
+your life with perfume and with joy.</p>
+<p>And do you know, it is a splendid thing to think that the woman
+you really love will never grow old to you. Through the wrinkles of
+time, through the mask of years, if you really love her, you will
+always see the face you loved and won. And a woman who really loves
+a man does not see that he grows old; he is not decrepit to her; he
+does not tremble; he is not old; she always sees the same gallant
+gentleman who won her hand and heart. I like to think of it in that
+way; I like to think that love is eternal. And to love in that way
+and then go down the hill of life together, and as you go down,
+hear, perhaps, the laughter of grandchildren, while the birds of
+joy and love sing once more in the leafless branches of the tree of
+age.</p>
+<p>I believe in the fireside. I believe in the democracy of home. I
+believe in the republicanism of the family. I believe in liberty,
+equality and love.</p>
+<a name="link0011"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>THE LIBERTY OF CHILDREN.</h2>
+<p>If women have been slaves, what shall I say of children; of the
+little children in alleys and sub-cellars; the little children who
+turn pale when they hear their fathers' footsteps; little children
+who run away when they only hear their names called by the lips of
+a mother; little children&mdash;the children of poverty, the
+children of crime, the children of brutality, wherever they
+are&mdash;flotsam and jetsam upon the wild, mad sea of
+life&mdash;my heart goes out to them, one and all.</p>
+<p>I tell you the children have the same rights that we have, and
+we ought to treat them as though they were human beings. They
+should be reared with love, with kindness, with tenderness, and not
+with brutality. That is my idea of children.</p>
+<p>When your little child tells a lie, do not rush at him as though
+the world were about to go into bankruptcy. Be honest with him. A
+tyrant father will have liars for his children; do you know
+that?</p>
+<p>A lie is born of tyranny upon the one hand and weakness upon the
+other, and when you rush at a poor little boy with a club in your
+hand, of course he lies.</p>
+<p>I thank thee, Mother Nature, that thou hast put ingenuity enough
+in the brain of a child, when attacked by a brutal parent, to throw
+up a little breastwork in the shape of a lie.</p>
+<p>When one of your children tells a lie, be honest with him; tell
+him that you have told hundreds of them yourself. Tell him it is
+not the best way; that you have tried it. Tell him as the man did
+in Maine when his boy left home: "John, honesty is the best policy;
+I have tried both." Be honest with him. Suppose a man as much
+larger than you as you are larger than a child five years old,
+should come at you with a liberty pole in his hand, and in a voice
+of thunder shout, "Who broke that plate?" There is not a solitary
+one of you who would not swear you never saw it, or that it was
+cracked when you got it. Why not be honest with these children?
+Just imagine a man who deals in stocks whipping his boy for putting
+false rumors afloat! Think of a lawyer beating his own flesh and
+blood for evading the truth when he makes half of his own living
+that way! Think of a minister punishing his child for not telling
+all he thinks! Just think of it!</p>
+<p>When your child commits a wrong, take it in your arms; let it
+feel your heart beat against its heart; let the child know that you
+really and truly and sincerely love it. Yet some Christians, good
+Christians, when a child commits a fault, drive it from the door
+and say: "Never do you darken this house again." Think of that! And
+then these same people will get down on their knees and ask God to
+take care of the child they have driven from home. I will never ask
+God to take care of my children unless I am doing my level best in
+that same direction.</p>
+<p>But I will tell you what I say to my children: "Go where you
+will; commit what crime you may; fall to what depth of degradation
+you may; you can never commit any crime that will shut my door, my
+arms, or my heart to you. As long as I live you shall have one
+sincere friend."</p>
+<p>Do you know that I have seen some people who acted as though
+they thought that when the Savior said "Suffer little children to
+come unto me, for of such is the kingdom of heaven," he had a
+raw-hide under his mande, and made that remark simply to get the
+children within striking distance?</p>
+<p>I do not believe in the government of the lash, if any one of
+you ever expects to whip your children again, I want you to have a
+photograph taken of yourself when you are in the act, with your
+face red with vulgar anger, and the face of the little child, with
+eyes swimming in tears and the little chin dimpled with fear, like
+a piece of water struck by a sudden cold wind. Have the picture
+taken. If that little child should die, I cannot think of a sweeter
+way to spend an autumn afternoon than to go out to the cemetery,
+when the maples are clad in tender gold, and little scarlet runners
+are coming, like poems of regret, from the sad heart of the
+earth&mdash;and sit down upon the grave and look at that
+photograph, and think of the flesh now dust that you beat. I tell
+you it is wrong; it is no way to raise children! Make your home
+happy. Be honest with them. Divide fairly with them in
+everything.</p>
+<p>Give them a little liberty and love, and you can not drive them
+out of your house. They will want to stay there. Make home
+pleasant. Let them play any game they wish. Do not be so foolish as
+to say: "You may roll balls on the ground, but you must not roll
+them on a green cloth. You may knock them with a mallet, but you
+must not push them with a cue. You may play with little pieces of
+paper which have 'authors' written on them, but you must not have
+'cards.'" Think of it! "You may go to a minstrel show where people
+blacken themselves and imitate humanity below them, but you must
+not go to a theatre and see the characters created by immortal
+genius put upon the stage." Why? Well, I can't think of any reason
+in the world except "minstrel" is a word of two syllables, and
+"theatre" has three.</p>
+<p>Let children have some daylight at home if you want to keep them
+there, and do not commence at the cradle and shout "Don't!"
+"Don't!" "Stop!" That is nearly all that is said to a child from
+the cradle until he is twenty-one years old, and when he comes of
+age other people begin saying "Don't!" And the church says "Don't!"
+and the party he belongs to says "Don't!"</p>
+<p>I despise that way of going through this world. Let us have
+liberty&mdash;just a little. Call me infidel, call me atheist, call
+me what you will, I intend so to treat my children, that they can
+come to my grave and truthfully say: "He who sleeps here never gave
+us a moment of pain. From his lips, now dust, never came to us an
+unkind word."</p>
+<p>People justify all kinds of tyranny toward children upon the
+ground that they are totally depraved. At the bottom of ages of
+cruelty lies this infamous doctrine of total depravity. Religion
+contemplates a child as a living crime&mdash;heir to an infinite
+curse&mdash;doomed to eternal fire.</p>
+<p>In the olden time, they thought some days were too good for a
+child to enjoy himself. When I was a boy Sunday was considered
+altogether too holy to be happy in. Sunday used to commence then
+when the sun went down on Saturday night. We commenced at that time
+for the purpose of getting a good ready, and when the sun fell
+below the horizon on Saturday evening, there was a darkness fell
+upon the house ten thousand times deeper than that of night. Nobody
+said a pleasant word; nobody laughed; nobody smiled; the child that
+looked the sickest was regarded as the most pious. That night you
+could not even crack hickory nuts. If you were caught chewing gum
+it was only another evidence of the total depravity of the human
+heart. It was an exceedingly solemn night.</p>
+<p>Dyspepsia was in the very air you breathed. Everybody looked sad
+and mournful. I have noticed all my life that many people think
+they have religion when they are troubled with dyspepsia. If there
+could be found an absolute specific for that disease, it would be
+the hardest blow the church has ever received.</p>
+<p>On Sunday morning the solemnity had simply increased. Then we
+went to church. The minister was in a pulpit about twenty feet
+high, with a little sounding-board above him, and he commenced at
+"firstly" and went on and on and on to about "twenty-thirdly." Then
+he made a few remarks by way of application; and then took a
+general view of the subject, and in about two hours reached the
+last chapter in Revelation.</p>
+<p>In those days, no matter how cold the weather was, there was no
+fire in the church. It was thought to be a kind of sin to be
+comfortable while you were thanking God. The first church that ever
+had a stove in it in New England, divided on that account. So the
+first church in which they sang by note, was torn in fragments.</p>
+<p>After the sermon we had an intermission. Then came the catechism
+with the chief end of man. We went through with that. We sat in a
+row with our feet coming in about six inches of the floor. The
+minister asked us if we knew that we all deserved to go to hell,
+and we all answered "Yes." Then we were asked if we would be
+willing to go to hell if it was God's will, and every little liar
+shouted "Yes." Then the same sermon was preached once more,
+commencing at the other end and going back. After that, we started
+for home, sad and solemn&mdash;overpowered with the wisdom
+displayed in the scheme of the atonement. When we got home, if we
+had been good boys, and the weather was warm, sometimes they would
+take us out to the graveyard to cheer us up a little. It did cheer
+me. When I looked at the sunken tombs and the leaning stones, and
+read the half-effaced inscriptions through the moss of silence and
+forgetfulness, it was a great comfort. The reflection came to my
+mind that the observance of the Sabbath could not last always.
+Sometimes they would sing that beautiful hymn in which occurs these
+cheerful lines:</p>
+<pre>
+ "Where congregations ne'er break up,
+ And Sabbaths never end."
+</pre>
+<p>These lines, I think, prejudiced me a little against even
+heaven. Then we had good books that we read on Sundays by way of
+keeping us happy and contented. There were Milners' "History of the
+Waldenses," Baxter's "Call to the Unconverted," Yahn's "Archaeology
+of the Jews," and Jenkyns' "On the Atonement." I used to read
+Jenkyns' "On the Atonement." I have often thought that an atonement
+would have to be exceedingly broad in its provisions to cover the
+case of a man who would write a book like that for a boy.</p>
+<p>But at last the Sunday wore away, and the moment the sun went
+down we were free. Between three and four o'clock we would go out
+to see how the sun was coming on. Sometimes it seemed to me that it
+was stopping from pure meanness. But finally it went down. It had
+to. And when the last rim of light sank below the horizon, off
+would go our caps, and we would give three cheers for liberty once
+more.</p>
+<p>Sabbaths used to be prisons. Every Sunday was a Bastile. Every
+Christian was a kind of turnkey, and every child was a
+prisoner,&mdash;a convict. In that dungeon, a smile was a
+crime.</p>
+<p>It was thought wrong for a child to laugh upon this holy day.
+Think of that!</p>
+<p>A little child would go out into the garden, and there would be
+a tree laden with blossoms, and the little fellow would lean
+against it, and there would be a bird on one of the boughs, singing
+and swinging, and thinking about four little speckled eggs, warmed
+by the breast of its mate,&mdash;singing and swinging, and the
+music in happy waves rippling out of its tiny throat, and the
+flowers blossoming, the air filled with perfume and the great white
+clouds floating in the sky, and the little boy would lean up
+against that tree and think about hell and the worm that never
+dies.</p>
+<p>I have heard them preach, when I sat in the pew and my feet did
+not touch the floor, about the final home of the unconverted. In
+order to impress upon the children the length of time they would
+probably stay if they settled in that country, the preacher would
+frequently give us the following illustration: "Suppose that once
+in a billion years a bird should come from some far-distant planet,
+and carry off in its little bill a grain of sand, a time would
+finally come when the last atom composing this earth would be
+carried away; and when this last atom was taken, it would not even
+be sun up in hell." Think of such an infamous doctrine being taught
+to children!</p>
+<p>The laugh of a child will make the holiest day-more sacred
+still. Strike, with hand of fire, O weird musician, thy harp strung
+with Apollo's golden hair; fill the vast cathedral aisles with
+symphonies sweet and dim, deft toucher of the organ keys; blow,
+bugler, blow, until thy silver notes do touch and kiss the moonlit
+waves, and charm the lovers wandering 'mid the vine-clad hills. But
+know, your sweetest strains are discords all, compared with
+childhood's happy laugh&mdash;the laugh that fills the eyes with
+light and every heart with joy. O rippling river of laughter, thou
+art the blessed boundary line between the beasts and men; and every
+wayward wave of thine doth drown some fretful fiend of care. O
+Laughter, rose-lipped daughter of Joy, there are dimples enough in
+thy cheeks to catch and hold and glorify all the tears of
+grief.</p>
+<p>And yet the minds of children have been polluted by this
+infamous doctrine of eternal punishment. I denounce it to-day as a
+doctrine, the infamy of which no language is sufficient to
+express.</p>
+<p>Where did that doctrine of eternal punishment for men and women
+and children come from? It came from the low and beastly skull of
+that wretch in the dug-out. Where did he get it? It was a souvenir
+from the animals. The doctrine of eternal punishment was born in
+the glittering eyes of snakes&mdash;snakes that hung in fearful
+coils watching for their prey. It was born of the howl and bark and
+growl of wild beasts. It was born of the grin of hyenas and of the
+depraved chatter of unclean baboons. I despise it with every drop
+of my blood. Tell me there is a God in the serene heavens that will
+damn his children for the expression of an honest belief! More men
+have died in their sins, judged by your orthodox creeds, than there
+are leaves on all the forests in the wide world ten thousand times
+over. Tell me these men are in hell; that these men are in torment;
+that these children are in eternal pain, and that they are to be
+punished forever and forever! I denounce this doctrine as the most
+infamous of lies.</p>
+<p>When the great ship containing the hopes and aspirations of the
+world, when the great ship freighted with mankind goes down in the
+night of death, chaos and disaster, I am willing to go down with
+the ship. I will not be guilty of the ineffable meanness of
+paddling away in some orthodox canoe. I will go down with the ship,
+with those who love me, and with those whom I have loved. If there
+is a God who will damn his children forever, I would rather go to
+hell than to go to heaven and keep the society of such an infamous
+tyrant. I make my choice now. I despise that doctrine. It has
+covered the cheeks of this world with tears. It has polluted the
+hearts of children, and poisoned the imaginations of men. It has
+been a constant pain, a perpetual terror to every good man and
+woman and child. It has filled the good with horror and with fear;
+but it has had no effect upon the infamous and base. It has wrung
+the hearts of the tender; it has furrowed the cheeks of the good.
+This doctrine never should be preached again. What right have you,
+sir, Mr. clergyman, you, minister of the gospel, to stand at the
+portals of the tomb, at the vestibule of eternity, and fill the
+future with horror and with fear? I do not believe this doctrine:
+neither do you. If you did, you could not sleep one moment. Any man
+who believes it, and has within his breast a decent, throbbing
+heart, will go insane. A man who believes that doctrine and does
+not go insane has the heart of a snake and the conscience of a
+hyena.</p>
+<p>Jonathan Edwards, the dear old soul, who, if his doctrine is
+true, is now in heaven rubbing his holy hands with glee, as he
+hears the cries of the damned, preached this doctrine; and he said:
+"Can the believing husband in heaven be happy with his unbelieving
+wife in hell? Can the believing father in heaven be happy with his
+unbelieving children in hell? Can the loving wife in heaven be
+happy with her unbelieving husband in hell?" And he replies: "I
+tell you, yea. Such will be their sense of justice, that it will
+increase rather than diminish their bliss." There is no wild beast
+in the jungles of Africa whose reputation would not be tarnished by
+the expression of such a doctrine.</p>
+<p>These doctrines have been taught in the name of religion, in the
+name of universal forgiveness, in the name of infinite love and
+charity. Do not, I pray you, soil the minds of your children with
+this dogma. Let them read for themselves; let them think for
+themselves.</p>
+<p>Do not treat your children like orthodox posts to be set in a
+row. Treat them like trees that need light and sun and air. Be fair
+and honest with them; give them a chance. Recollect that their
+rights are equal to yours. Do not have it in your mind that you
+must govern them; that they must obey. Throw away forever the idea
+of master and slave.</p>
+<p>In old times they used to make the children go to bed when they
+were not sleepy, and get up when they were sleepy. I say let them
+go to bed when they are sleepy, and get up when they are not
+sleepy.</p>
+<p>But you say, this doctrine will do for the rich but not for the
+poor. Well, if the poor have to waken their children early in the
+morning it is as easy to wake them with a kiss as with a blow. Give
+your children freedom; let them preserve their individuality. Let
+your children eat what they desire, and commence at the end of a
+dinner they like. That is their business and not yours. They know
+what they wish to eat. If they are given their liberty from the
+first, they know what they want better than any doctor in the world
+can prescribe. Do you know that all the improvement that has ever
+been made in the practice of medicine has been made by the
+recklessness of patients and not by the doctors? For thousands and
+thousands of years the doctors would not let a man suffering from
+fever have a drop of water. Water they looked upon as poison. But
+every now and then some man got reckless and said, "I had rather
+die than not to slake my thirst." Then he would drink two or three
+quarts of water and get well. And when the doctor was told of what
+the patient had done, he expressed great surprise that he was still
+alive, and complimented his constitution upon being able to bear
+such a frightful strain. The reckless men, however, kept on
+drinking the water, and persisted in getting well. And finally the
+doctors said: "In a fever, water is the very best thing you can
+take." So, I have more confidence in the voice of nature about such
+things than I have in the conclusions of the medical schools.</p>
+<p>Let your children have freedom and they will fall into your
+ways; they will do substantially as you do; but if you try to make
+them, there is some magnificent, splendid thing in the human heart
+that refuses to be driven. And do you know that it is the luckiest
+thing that ever happened for this world, that people are that way.
+What would have become of the people five hundred years ago if they
+had followed strictly the advice of the doctors? They would have
+all been dead. What would the people have been, if at any age of
+the world they had followed implicitly the direction of the church?
+They would have all been idiots. It is a splendid thing that there
+is always some grand man who will not mind, and who will think for
+himself.</p>
+<p>I believe in allowing the children to think for themselves. I
+believe in the democracy of the family. If in this world there is
+anything splendid, it is a home where all are equals.</p>
+<p>You will remember that only a few years ago parents would tell
+their children to "let their victuals stop their mouths." They used
+to eat as though it were a religious ceremony&mdash;a very solemn
+thing. Life should not be treated as a solemn matter. I like to see
+the children at table, and hear each one telling of the wonderful
+things he has seen and heard. I like to hear the clatter of knives
+and forks and spoons mingling with their happy voices. I had rather
+hear it than any opera that was ever put upon the boards. Let the
+children have liberty. Be honest and fair with them; be just; be
+tender, and they will make you rich in love and joy.</p>
+<p>Men are oaks, women are vines, children are flowers.</p>
+<p>The human race has been guilty of almost countless crimes; but I
+have some excuse for mankind. This world, after all, is not very
+well adapted to raising good people. In the first place, nearly all
+of it is water. It is much better adapted to fish culture than to
+the production of folks. Of that portion which is land not
+one-eighth has suitable soil and climate to produce great men and
+women. You cannot raise men and women of genius, without the proper
+soil and climate, any more than you can raise corn and wheat upon
+the ice fields of the Arctic sea. You must have the necessary
+conditions and surroundings. Man is a product; you must have the
+soil and food. The obstacles presented by nature must not be so
+great that man cannot, by reasonable industry and courage, overcome
+them. There is upon this world only a narrow belt of land, circling
+zigzag the globe, upon which you can produce men and women of
+talent. In the Southern Hemisphere the real climate that man needs
+falls mostly upon the sea, and the result is, that the southern
+half of our world has never produced a man or woman of great
+genius. In the far north there is no genius&mdash;it is too cold.
+In the far south there is no genius&mdash;it is too warm. There
+must be winter, and there must be summer. In a country where man
+needs no coverlet but a cloud, revolution is his normal condition.
+Winter is the mother of industry and prudence. Above all, it is the
+mother of the family relation. Winter holds in its icy arms the
+husband and wife and the sweet children. If upon this earth we ever
+have a glimpse of heaven, it is when we pass a home in winter, at
+night, and through the windows, the curtains drawn aside, we see
+the family about the pleasant hearth; the old lady knitting; the
+cat playing with the yarn; the children wishing they had as many
+dolls or dollars or knives or somethings, as there are sparks going
+out to join the roaring blast; the father reading and smoking, and
+the clouds rising like incense from the altar of domestic joy. I
+never passed such a house without feeling that I had received a
+benediction.</p>
+<p>Civilization, liberty, justice, charity, intellectual
+advancement, are all flowers that blossom in the drifted snow.</p>
+<p>I do not know that I can better illustrate the great truth that
+only part of the world is adapted to the production of great men
+and women than by calling your attention to the difference between
+vegetation in valleys and upon mountains. In the valley you find
+the oak and elm tossing their branches defiantly to the storm, and
+as you advance up the mountain side the hemlock, the pine, the
+birch, the spruce, the fir, and finally you come to little dwarfed
+trees, that look like other trees seen through a telescope
+reversed&mdash;every limb twisted as though in pain&mdash;getting a
+scanty subsistence from the miserly crevices of the rocks. You go
+on and on, until at last the highest crag is freckled with a kind
+of moss, and vegetation ends. You might as well try to raise oaks
+and elms where the mosses grow, as to raise great men and great
+women where their surroundings are unfavorable. You must have the
+proper climate and soil.</p>
+<p>A few years ago we were talking about the annexation of Santo
+Domingo to this country. I was in Washington at the time. I was
+opposed to it I was told that it was a most delicious climate; that
+the soil produced everything. But I said: "We do not want it; it is
+not the right kind of country in which to raise American citizens.
+Such a climate would debauch us. You might go there with five
+thousand Congregational preachers, five thousand ruling elders,
+five thousand professors in colleges, five thousand of the solid
+men of Boston and their wives; settle them all in Santo Domingo,
+and you will see the second generation riding upon a mule,
+bareback, no shoes, a grapevine bridle, hair sticking out at the
+top of their sombreros, with a rooster under each arm, going to a
+cock fight on Sunday." Such is the influence of climate.</p>
+<p>Science, however, is gradually widening the area within which
+men of genius can be produced. We are conquering the north with
+houses, clothing, food and fuel. We are in many ways overcoming the
+heat of the south. If we attend to this world instead of another,
+we may in time cover the land with men and women of genius.</p>
+<p>I have still another excuse. I believe that man came up from the
+lower animals. I do not say this as a fact. I simply say I believe
+it to be a fact. Upon that question I stand about eight to seven,
+which, for all practical purposes, is very near a certainty. When I
+first heard of that doctrine I did not like it. My heart was filled
+with sympathy for those people who have nothing to be proud of
+except ancestors. I thought, how terrible this will be upon the
+nobility of the Old World. Think of their being forced to trace
+their ancestry back to the duke Orang Outang, or to the princess
+Chimpanzee. After thinking it all over, I came to the conclusion
+that I liked that doctrine. I became convinced in spite of myself.
+I read about rudimentary bones and muscles. I was told that
+everybody had rudimentary muscles extending from the ear into the
+cheek. I asked "What are they?" I was told: "They are the remains
+of muscles; that they became rudimentary from lack of use; they
+went into bankruptcy. They are the muscles with which your
+ancestors used to flap their ears." I do not now so much wonder
+that we once had them as that we have outgrown them.</p>
+<p>After all I had rather belong to a race that started from the
+skull-less vertebrates in the dim Laurentian seas, vertebrates
+wiggling without knowing why they wiggled, swimming without knowing
+where they were going, but that in some way began to develop, and
+began to get a little higher and a little higher in the scale of
+existence; that came up by degrees through millions of ages through
+all the animal world, through all that crawls and swims and floats
+and climbs and walks, and finally produced the gentleman in the
+dug-out; and then from this man, getting a little grander, and each
+one below calling every one above him a heretic, calling every one
+who had made a little advance an infidel or an atheist&mdash;for in
+the history of this world the man who is ahead has always been
+called a heretic&mdash;I would rather come from a race that started
+from that skull-less vertebrate, and came up and up and up and
+finally produced Shakespeare, the man who found the human intellect
+dwelling in a hut, touched it with the wand of his genius and it
+became a palace domed and pinnacled; Shakespeare, who harvested all
+the fields of dramatic thought, and from whose day to this, there
+have been only gleaners of straw and chaff&mdash;I would rather
+belong to that race that commenced a skull-less vertebrate and
+produced Shakespeare, a race that has before it an infinite future,
+with the angel of progress leaning from the far horizon, beckoning
+men forward, upward and onward forever&mdash;I had rather belong to
+such a race, commencing there, producing this, and with that hope,
+than to have sprung from a perfect pair upon which the Lord has
+lost money every moment from that day to this.</p>
+<a name="linkCONC"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>CONCLUSION.</h2>
+<p>I have given you my honest thought. Surely investigation is
+better than unthinking faith. Surely reason is a better guide than
+fear. This world should be controlled by the living, not by the
+dead. The grave is not a throne, and a corpse is not a king. Man
+should not try to live on ashes.</p>
+<p>The theologians dead, knew no more than the theologians now
+living. More than this cannot be said. About this world little is
+known,&mdash;about another world, nothing.</p>
+<p>Our fathers were intellectual serfs, and their fathers were
+slaves. The makers of our creeds were ignorant and brutal. Every
+dogma that we have, has upon it the mark of whip, the rust of
+chain, and the ashes of fagot.</p>
+<p>Our fathers reasoned with instruments of torture. They believed
+in the logic of fire and sword. They hated reason. They despised
+thought. They abhorred liberty.</p>
+<p>Superstition is the child of slavery. Free thought will give us
+truth. When all have the right to think and to express their
+thoughts, every brain will give to all the best it has. The world
+will then be filled with intellectual wealth.</p>
+<p>As long as men and women are afraid of the church, as long as a
+minister inspires fear, as long as people reverence a thing simply
+because they do not understand it, as long as it is respectable to
+lose your self-respect, as long as the church has power, as long as
+mankind worship a book, just so long will the world be filled with
+intellectual paupers and vagrants, covered with the soiled and
+faded rags of superstition.</p>
+<p>As long as woman regards the Bible as the charter of her rights,
+she will be the slave of man. The Bible was not written by a woman.
+Within its lids there is nothing but humiliation and shame for her.
+She is regarded as the property of man. She is made to ask
+forgiveness for becoming a mother. She is as much below her
+husband, as her husband is below Christ. She is not allowed to
+speak. The gospel is too pure to be spoken by her polluted lips.
+Woman should learn in silence.</p>
+<p>In the Bible will be found no description of a civilized home.
+The free mother surrounded by free and loving children, adored by a
+free man, her husband, was unknown to the inspired writers of the
+Bible. They did not believe in the democracy of home&mdash;in the
+republicanism of the fireside.</p>
+<p>These inspired gentlemen knew nothing of the rights of children.
+They were the advocates of brute force&mdash;the disciples of the
+lash. They knew nothing of human rights. Their doctrines have
+brutalized the homes of millions, and filled the eyes of infancy
+with tears.</p>
+<p>Let us free ourselves from the tyranny of a book, from the
+slavery of dead ignorance, from the aristocracy of the air.</p>
+<p>There has never been upon the earth a generation of free men and
+women. It is not yet time to write a creed. Wait until the chains
+are broken&mdash;until dungeons are not regarded as temples. Wait
+until solemnity is not mistaken for wisdom&mdash;until mental
+cowardice ceases to be known as reverence. Wait until the living
+are considered the equals of the dead&mdash;until the cradle takes
+precedence of the coffin. Wait until what we know can be spoken
+without regard to what others may believe. Wait until teachers take
+the place of preachers&mdash;until followers become investigators.
+Wait until the world is free before you write a creed.</p>
+<p>In this creed there will be but one word&mdash;Liberty.</p>
+<p>Oh Liberty, float not forever in the far horizon&mdash;remain
+not forever in the dream of the enthusiast, the philanthropist and
+poet, but come and make thy home among the children of men!</p>
+<p>I know not what discoveries, what inventions, what thoughts may
+leap from the brain of the world. I know not what garments of glory
+may be woven by the years to come. I cannot dream of the victories
+to be won upon the fields of thought; but I do know, that coming
+from the infinite sea of the future, there will never touch this
+"bank and shoal of time" a richer gift, a rarer blessing than
+liberty for man, for woman, and for child.</p>
+<a name="link0013"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>ABOUT FARMING IN ILLINOIS</h2>
+<p>To Plow is to Pray&mdash;to Plant is to Prophesy, and the
+Harvest Answers and Fulfills.</p>
+<p>I AM not an old and experienced farmer, nor a tiller of the
+soil, nor one of the hard-handed sons of labor. I imagine, however,
+that I know something about cultivating the soil, and getting
+happiness out of the ground.</p>
+<p>I know enough to know that agriculture is the basis of all
+wealth, prosperity and luxury. I know that in a country where the
+tillers of the fields are free, everybody is free and ought to be
+prosperous. Happy is that country where those who cultivate the
+land own it. Patriotism is born in the woods and fields&mdash;by
+lakes and streams&mdash;by crags and plains.</p>
+<p>The old way of farming was a great mistake. Everything was done
+the wrong way. It was all work and waste, weariness and want. They
+used to fence a hundred and sixty acres of land with a couple of
+dogs. Everything was left to the protection of the blessed trinity
+of chance, accident and mistake.</p>
+<p>When I was a farmer they used to haul wheat two hundred miles in
+wagons and sell it for thirty-five cents a bushel. They would bring
+home about three hundred feet of lumber, two bunches of shingles, a
+barrel of salt, and a cook-stove that never would draw and never
+did bake.</p>
+<p>In those blessed days the people lived on corn and bacon.
+Cooking was an unknown art. Eating was a necessity, not a pleasure.
+It was hard work for the cook to keep on good terms even with
+hunger.</p>
+<p>We had poor houses. The rain held the roofs in perfect contempt,
+and the snow drifted joyfully on the floors and beds. They had no
+barns. The horses were kept in rail pens surrounded with straw.
+Long before spring the sides would be eaten away and nothing but
+roofs would be left. Food is fuel. When the cattle were exposed to
+all the blasts of winter, it took all the corn and oats that could
+be stuffed into them to prevent actual starvation.</p>
+<p>In those times most farmers thought the best place for the
+pig-pen was immediately in front of the house. There is nothing
+like sociability.</p>
+<p>Women were supposed to know the art of making fires without
+fuel. The wood pile consisted, as a general thing, of one log upon
+which an axe or two had been worn out in vain. There was nothing to
+kindle a fire with. Pickets were pulled from the garden fence,
+clap-boards taken from the house, and every stray plank was seized
+upon for kindling. Everything was done in the hardest way.
+Everything about the farm was disagreeable. Nothing was kept in
+order. Nothing was preserved. The wagons stood in the sun and rain,
+and the plows rusted in the fields. There was no leisure, no
+feeling that the work was done. It was all labor and weariness and
+vexation of spirit. The crops were destroyed by wandering herds, or
+they were put in too late, or too early, or they were blown down,
+or caught by the frost, or devoured by bugs, or stung by flies, or
+eaten by worms, or carried away by birds, or dug up by gophers, or
+washed away by floods, or dried up by the sun, or rotted in the
+stack, or heated in the crib, or they all run to vines, or tops, or
+straw, or smut, or cobs. And when in spite of all these accidents
+that lie in wait between, the plow and the reaper, they did succeed
+in raising a good crop and a high price was offered, then the roads
+would be impassable. And when the roads got good, then the prices
+went down. Everything worked together for evil.</p>
+<p>Nearly every farmer's boy took an oath that he never would
+cultivate the soil. The moment they arrived at the age of
+twenty-one they left the desolate and dreary farms and rushed to
+the towns and cities. They wanted to be bookkeepers, doctors,
+merchants, railroad men, insurance agents, lawyers, even preachers,
+anything to avoid the drudgery of the farm. Nearly every boy
+acquainted with the three R's&mdash;reading, writing, and
+arithmetic&mdash;imagined that he had altogether more education
+than ought to be wasted in raising potatoes and corn. They made
+haste to get into some other business. Those who stayed upon the
+farm envied those who went away.</p>
+<p>A few years ago the times were prosperous, and the young men
+went to the cities to enjoy the fortunes that were waiting for
+them. They wanted to engage in something that promised quick
+returns. They built railways, established banks and insurance
+companies. They speculated in stocks in Wall Street, and gambled in
+grain at Chicago. They became rich. They lived in palaces. They
+rode in carriages. They pitied their poor brothers on the farms,
+and the poor brothers envied them.</p>
+<p>But time has brought its revenge. The farmers have seen the
+railroad president a bankrupt, and the road in the hands of a
+receiver. They have seen the bank president abscond, and the
+insurance company a wrecked and ruined fraud. The only solvent
+people, as a class, the only independent people, are the tillers of
+the soil.</p>
+<p>Farming must be made more attractive. The comforts of the town
+must be added to the beauty of the fields. The sociability of the
+city must be rendered possible in the country.</p>
+<p>Farming has been made repulsive. The farmers have been
+unsociable and their homes have been lonely. They have been
+wasteful and careless. They have not been proud of their
+business.</p>
+<p>In the first place, farming ought to be reasonably profitable.
+The farmers have not attended to their own interests. They have
+been robbed and plundered in a hundred ways.</p>
+<p>No farmer can afford to raise corn and oats and hay to sell. He
+should sell horses, not oats; sheep, cattle and pork, not corn. He
+should make every profit possible out of what he produces. So long
+as the farmers of Illinois ship their corn and oats, so long they
+will be poor,&mdash;just so long will their farms be mortgaged to
+the insurance companies and banks of the East,&mdash;just so long
+will they do the work and others reap the benefit,&mdash;just so
+long will they be poor, and the money lenders grow rich,&mdash;just
+so long will cunning avarice grasp and hold the net profits of
+honest toil. When the farmers of the West ship beef and pork
+instead of grain,&mdash;when we manufacture here,&mdash;when we
+cease paying tribute to others, ours will be the most prosperous
+country in the world.</p>
+<p>Another thing&mdash;It is just as cheap to raise a good as a
+poor breed of cattle. Scrubs will eat just as much as
+thoroughbreds. If you are not able to buy Durhams and Alderneys,
+you can raise the corn breed. By "corn breed" I mean the cattle
+that have, for several generations, had enough to eat, and have
+been treated with kindness. Every farmer who will treat his cattle
+kindly, and feed them all they want, will, in a few years, have
+blooded stock on his farm. All blooded stock has been produced in
+this way. You can raise good cattle just as you can raise good
+people. If you wish to raise a good boy you must give him plenty to
+eat, and treat him with kindness. In this way, and in this way
+only, can good cattle or good people be produced.</p>
+<p>Another thing&mdash;You must beautify your homes.</p>
+<p>When I was a farmer it was not fashionable to set out trees, nor
+to plant vines.</p>
+<p>When you visited the farm you were not welcomed by flowers, and
+greeted by trees loaded with fruit. Yellow dogs came bounding over
+the tumbled fence like wild beasts. There is no sense&mdash;there
+is no profit in such a life. It is not living. The farmers ought to
+beautify their homes. There should be trees and grass and flowers
+and running vines. Everything should be kept in order&mdash;gates
+should be on their hinges, and about all there should be the
+pleasant air of thrift. In every house there should be a bath-room.
+The bath is a civilizer, a refiner, a beautifier. When you come
+from the fields tired, covered with dust, nothing is so refreshing.
+Above all things, keep clean. It is not necessary to be a pig in
+order to raise one. In the cool of the evening, after a day in the
+field, put on clean clothes, take a seat under the trees, 'mid the
+perfume of flowers, surrounded by your family, and you will know
+what it is to enjoy life like a gentleman.</p>
+<p>In no part of the globe will farming pay better than in
+Illinois. You are in the best portion of the earth. From the
+Atlantic to the Pacific, there is no such country as yours. The
+East is hard and stony; the soil is stingy. The far West is a
+desert parched and barren, dreary and desolate as perdition would
+be with the fires out. It is better to dig wheat and corn from the
+soil than gold. Only a few days ago, I was where they wrench the
+precious metals from the miserly clutch of the rocks. When I saw
+the mountains, treeless, shrub-less, flowerless, without even a
+spire of grass, it seemed to me that gold had the same effect upon
+the country that holds it, as upon the man who lives and labors
+only for that. It affects the land as it does the man. It leaves
+the heart barren without a flower of kindness&mdash;without a
+blossom of pity.</p>
+<p>The farmer in Illinois has the best soil&mdash;the greatest
+return for the least labor&mdash;more leisure&mdash;more time for
+enjoyment than any other farmer in the world. His hard work ceases
+with autumn. He has the long winters in which to become acquainted
+with his family&mdash;with his neighbors&mdash;in which to read and
+keep abreast with the advanced thought of his day. He has the time
+and means for self-culture. He has more time than the mechanic, the
+merchant or the professional man. If the farmer is not well
+informed it is his own fault. Books are cheap, and every farmer can
+have enough to give him the outline of every science, and an idea
+of all that has been accomplished by man.</p>
+<p>In many respects the farmer has the advantage of the mechanic.
+In our time we have plenty of mechanics but no tradesmen. In the
+sub-division of labor we have a thousand men working upon different
+parts of the same thing, each taught in one particular branch, and
+in only one. We have, say, in a shoe factory, hundreds of men, but
+not one shoemaker. It takes them all, assisted by a great number of
+machines, to make a shoe. Each does a particular part, and not one
+of them knows the entire trade. The result is that the moment the
+factory shuts down these men are out of employment. Out of
+employment means out of bread&mdash;out of bread means famine and
+horror. The mechanic of to-day has but little independence. His
+prosperity often depends upon the good will of one man. He is
+liable to be discharged for a look, for a word. He lays by but
+little for his declining years. He is, at the best, the slave of
+capital.</p>
+<p>It is a thousand times better to be a whole farmer than part of
+a mechanic. It is better to till the ground and work for yourself
+than to be hired by corporations. Every man should endeavor to
+belong to himself.</p>
+<p>About seven hundred years ago, Khayyam, a Persian, said: "Why
+should a man who possesses a piece of bread securing life for two
+days, and who has a cup of water&mdash;why should such a man be
+commanded by another, and why should such a man serve another?"</p>
+<p>Young men should not be satisfied with a salary. Do not mortgage
+the possibilities of your future. Have the courage to take life as
+it comes, feast or famine. Think of hunting a gold mine for a
+dollar a day, and think of finding one for another man. How would
+you feel then?</p>
+<p>We are lacking in true courage, when, for fear of the future, we
+take the crusts and scraps and niggardly salaries of the present. I
+had a thousand times rather have a farm and be independent, than to
+be President of the United States without independence, filled with
+doubt and trembling, feeling of the popular pulse, resorting to art
+and artifice, enquiring about the wind of opinion, and succeeding
+at last in losing my self-respect without gaining the respect of
+others.</p>
+<p>Man needs more manliness, more real independence. We must take
+care of ourselves. This we can do by labor, and in this way we can
+preserve our independence. We should try and choose that business
+or profession the pursuit of which will give us the most happiness.
+Happiness is wealth. We can be happy without being
+rich&mdash;without holding office&mdash;without being famous. I am
+not sure that we can be happy with wealth, with office, or with
+fame.</p>
+<p>There is a quiet about the life of a farmer, and the hope of a
+serene old age, that no other business or profession can promise. A
+professional man is doomed sometime to feel that his powers are
+waning. He is doomed to see younger and stronger men pass him in
+the race of life. He looks forward to an old age of intellectual
+mediocrity. He will be last where once he was the first. But the
+farmer goes, as it were, into partnership with nature&mdash;he
+lives with trees and flowers&mdash;he breathes the sweet air of the
+fields. There is no constant and frightful strain upon his mind.
+His nights are filled with sleep and rest. He watches his flocks
+and herds as they feed upon the green and sunny slopes. He hears
+the pleasant rain falling upon the waving corn, and the trees he
+planted in youth rustle above him as he plants others for the
+children yet to be.</p>
+<p>Our country is filled with the idle and unemployed, and the
+great question asking for an answer is: What shall be done with
+these men? What shall these men do? To this there is but one
+answer: They must cultivate the soil. Farming must be rendered more
+attractive. Those who work the land must have an honest pride in
+their business. They must educate their children to cultivate the
+soil. They must make farming easier, so that their children will
+not hate it&mdash;so that they will not hate it themselves. The
+boys must not be taught that tilling the ground is a curse and
+almost a disgrace. They must not suppose that education is thrown
+away upon them unless they become ministers, merchants, lawyers,
+doctors, or statesmen. It must be understood that education can be
+used to advantage on a farm. We must get rid of the idea that a
+little learning unfits one for work. There is no real conflict
+between Latin and labor. There are hundreds of graduates of Yale
+and Harvard and other colleges, who are agents of sewing machines,
+solicitors for insurance, clerks, copyists, in short, performing a
+hundred varieties of menial service. They seem willing to do
+anything that is not regarded as work&mdash;anything that can be
+done in a town, in the house, in an office, but they avoid farming
+as they would a leprosy. Nearly every young man educated in this
+way is simply ruined. Such an education ought to be called
+ignorance. It is a thousand times better to have common sense
+without education, than education without the sense. Boys and girls
+should be educated to help themselves. They should be taught that
+it is disgraceful to be idle, and dishonorable to be useless.</p>
+<p>I say again, if you want more men and women on the farms,
+something must be done to make farm life pleasant. One great
+difficulty is that the farm is lonely. People write about the
+pleasures of solitude, but they are found only in books. He who
+lives long alone becomes insane. A hermit is a madman. Without
+friends and wife and child, there is nothing left worth living for.
+The unsocial are the enemies of joy. They are filled with egotism
+and envy, with vanity and hatred. People who live much alone become
+narrow and suspicious. They are apt to be the property of one idea.
+They begin to think there is no use in anything. They look upon the
+happiness of others as a kind of folly. They hate joyous folks,
+because, way down in their hearts, they envy them.</p>
+<p>In our country, farm-life is too lonely. The farms are large,
+and neighbors are too far apart. In these days, when the roads are
+filled with "tramps," the wives and children need protection. When
+the farmer leaves home and goes to some distant field to work, a
+shadow of fear is upon his heart all day, and a like shadow rests
+upon all at home.</p>
+<p>In the early settlement of our country the pioneer was forced to
+take his family, his axe, his dog and his gun, and go into the far
+wild forest, and build his cabin miles and miles from any neighbor.
+He saw the smoke from his hearth go up alone in all the wide and
+lonely sky.</p>
+<p>But this necessity has passed away, and now, instead of living
+so far apart upon the lonely farms, you should live in villages.
+With the improved machinery which you have&mdash;with your generous
+soil&mdash;with your markets and means of transportation, you can
+now afford to live together.</p>
+<p>It is not necessary in this age of the world for the farmer to
+rise in the middle of the night and begin his work. This getting up
+so early in the morning is a relic of barbarism. It has made
+hundreds and thousands of young men curse the business. There is no
+need of getting up at three or four o'clock in the winter morning.
+The farmer who persists in doing it and persists in dragging his
+wife and children from their beds ought to be visited by a
+missionary. It is time enough to rise after the sun has set the
+example. For what purpose do you get up? To feed the cattle? Why
+not feed them more the night before? It is a waste of life. In the
+old times they used to get up about three o'clock in the morning,
+and go to work long before the sun had risen with "healing upon his
+wings," and as a just punishment they all had the ague; and they
+ought to have it now. The man who cannot get a living upon Illinois
+soil without rising before daylight ought to starve. Eight hours a
+day is enough for any farmer to work except in harvest time. When
+you rise at four and work till dark what is life worth? Of what use
+are all the improvements in farming? Of what use is all the
+improved machinery unless it tends to give the farmer a little more
+leisure? What is harvesting now, compared with what it was in the
+old time? Think of the days of reaping, of cradling, of raking and
+binding and mowing. Think of threshing with the flail and winnowing
+with the wind. And now think of the reapers and mowers, the binders
+and threshing machines, the plows and cultivators, upon which the
+farmer rides protected from the sun. If, with all these advantages,
+you cannot get a living without rising in the middle of the night,
+go into some other business. You should not rob your families of
+sleep. Sleep is the best medicine in the world. It is the best
+doctor upon the earth. There is no such thing as health without
+plenty of sleep. Sleep until you are thoroughly rested and
+restored. When you work, work; and when you get through take a
+good, long, and refreshing rest.</p>
+<p>You should live in villages, so that you can have the benefits
+of social life. You can have a reading-room&mdash;you can take the
+best papers and magazines&mdash;you can have plenty of books, and
+each one can have the benefit of them all. Some of the young men
+and women can cultivate music. You can have social
+gatherings&mdash;you can learn from each other&mdash;you can
+discuss all topics of interest, and in this way you can make
+farming a delightful business. You must keep up with the age. The
+way to make farming respectable is for farmers to become really
+intelligent. They must live intelligent and happy lives. They must
+know something of books and something of what is going on in the
+world. They must not be satisfied with knowing something of the
+affairs of a neighborhood and nothing about the rest of the earth.
+The business must be made attractive, and it never can be until the
+farmer has prosperity, intelligence and leisure.</p>
+<p>Another thing&mdash;I am a believer in fashion. It is the duty
+of every woman to make herself as beautiful and attractive as she
+possibly can.</p>
+<p>"Handsome is as handsome does," but she is much handsomer if
+well dressed. Every man should look his very best. I am a believer
+in good clothes. The time never ought to come in this country when
+you can tell a farmer's wife or daughter simply by the garments she
+wears. I say to every girl and woman, no matter what the material
+of your dress may be, no matter how cheap and coarse it is, cut it
+and make it in the fashion. I believe in jewelry. Some people look
+upon it as barbaric, but in my judgment, wearing jewelry is the
+first evidence the barbarian gives of a wish to be civilized. To
+adorn ourselves seems to be a part of our nature, and this desire
+seems to be everywhere and in everything. I have sometimes thought
+that the desire for beauty covers the earth with flowers. It is
+this desire that paints the wings of moths, tints the chamber of
+the shell, and gives the bird its plumage and its song. Oh
+daughters and wives, if you would be loved, adorn
+yourselves&mdash;if you would be adored, be beautiful!</p>
+<p>There is another fault common with the farmers of our
+country&mdash;they want too much land. You cannot, at present, when
+taxes are high, afford to own land that you do not cultivate. Sell
+it and let others make farms and homes. In this way what you keep
+will be enhanced in value. Farmers ought to own the land they
+cultivate, and cultivate what they own. Renters can hardly be
+called farmers. There can be no such thing in the highest sense as
+a home unless you own it. There must be an incentive to plant
+trees, to beautify the grounds, to preserve and improve. It
+elevates a man to own a home. It gives a certain independence, a
+force of character that is obtained in no other way. A man without
+a home feels like a passenger. There is in such a man a little of
+the vagrant. Homes make patriots. He who has sat by his own
+fireside with wife and children will defend it. When he hears the
+word country pronounced, he thinks of his home.</p>
+<p>Few men have been patriotic enough to shoulder a musket in
+defence of a boarding house.</p>
+<p>The prosperity and glory of our country depend upon the number
+of our people who are the owners of homes. Around the fireside
+cluster the private and the public virtues of our race. Raise your
+sons to be independent through labor&mdash;to pursue some business
+for themselves and upon their own account&mdash;to be
+self-reliant&mdash;to act upon their own responsibility, and to
+take the consequences like men. Teach them above all things to be
+good, true and tender husbands&mdash;winners of love and builders
+of homes.</p>
+<p>A great many farmers seem to think that they are the only
+laborers in the world. This is a very foolish thing. Farmers cannot
+get along without the mechanic. You are not independent of the man
+of genius. Your prosperity depends upon the inventor. The world
+advances by the assistance of all laborers; and all labor is under
+obligations to the inventions of genius. The inventor does as much
+for agriculture as he who tills the soil. All laboring men should
+be brothers. You are in partnership with the mechanics who make
+your reapers, your mowers and your plows; and you should take into
+your granges all the men who make their living by honest labor. The
+laboring people should unite and should protect themselves against
+all idlers. You can divide mankind into two classes: the laborers
+and the idlers, the supporters and the supported, the honest and
+the dishonest. Every man is dishonest who lives upon the unpaid
+labor of others, no matter if he occupies a throne. All laborers
+should be brothers. The laborers should have equal rights before
+the world and before the law. And I want every farmer to consider
+every man who labors either with hand or brain as his brother.
+Until genius and labor formed a partnership there was no such thing
+as prosperity among men. Every reaper and mower, every agricultural
+implement, has elevated the work of the farmer, and his vocation
+grows grander with every invention. In the olden time the
+agriculturist was ignorant; he knew nothing of machinery, he was
+the slave of superstition. He was always trying to appease some
+imaginary power by fasting and prayer. He supposed that some being
+actuated by malice, sent the untimely frost, or swept away with the
+wild wind his rude abode. To him the seasons were mysteries. The
+thunder told him of an enraged god&mdash;the barren fields of the
+vengeance of heaven. The tiller of the soil lived in perpetual and
+abject fear. He knew nothing of mechanics, nothing of order,
+nothing of law, nothing of cause and effect. He was a superstitious
+savage. He invented prayers instead of plows, creeds instead of
+reapers and mowers. He was unable to devote all his time to the
+gods, and so he hired others to assist him, and for their influence
+with the gentlemen supposed to control the weather, he gave
+one-tenth of all he could produce.</p>
+<p>The farmer has been elevated through science and he should not
+forget the debt he owes to the mechanic, to the inventor, to the
+thinker. He should remember that all laborers belong to the same
+grand family&mdash;that they are the real kings and queens, the
+only true nobility.</p>
+<p>Another idea entertained by most farmers is that they are in
+some mysterious way oppressed by every other kind of
+business&mdash;that they are devoured by monopolies, especially by
+railroads.</p>
+<p>Of course, the railroads are indebted to the farmers for their
+prosperity, and the farmers are indebted to the railroads. Without
+them Illinois would be almost worthless.</p>
+<p>A few years ago you endeavored to regulate the charges of
+railroad companies. The principal complaint you had was that they
+charged too much for the transportation of corn and other cereals
+to the East. You should remember that all freights are paid by the
+consumer; and that it made little difference to you what the
+railroad charged for transportation to the East, as that
+transportation had to be paid by the consumers of the grain. You
+were really interested in transportation from the East to the West
+and in local freights. The result is that while you have put down
+through freights you have not succeeded so well in local freights.
+The exact opposite should be the policy of Illinois. Put down local
+freights; put them down, if you can, to the lowest possible figure,
+and let through rates take care of themselves. If all the corn
+raised in Illinois could be transported to New York absolutely
+free, it would enhance but little the price that you would receive.
+What we want is the lowest possible local rate. Instead of this you
+have simply succeeded in helping the East at the expense of the
+West. The railroads are your friends. They are your partners. They
+can prosper only where the country through which they run prospers.
+All intelligent railroad men know this. They know that present
+robbery is future bankruptcy. They know that the interest of the
+farmer and of the railroad is the same. We must have railroads.
+What can we do without them?</p>
+<p>When we had no railroads, we drew, as I said before, our grain
+two hundred miles to market.</p>
+<p>In those days the farmers did not stop at hotels. They slept
+under their wagons&mdash;took with them their food&mdash;fried
+their own bacon, made their coffee, and ate their meals in the snow
+and rain. Those were the days when they received ten cents a bushel
+for corn&mdash;when they sold four bushels of potatoes for a
+quarter&mdash;thirty-three dozen eggs for a dollar, and a hundred
+pounds of pork for a dollar and a half.</p>
+<p>What has made the difference?</p>
+<p>The railroads came to your door and they brought with them the
+markets of the world. They brought New York and Liverpool and
+London into Illinois, and the State has been clothed with
+prosperity as with a mantle. It is the interest of the farmer to
+protect every great interest in the State. You should feel proud
+that Illinois has more railroads than any other State in this
+Union. Her main tracks and side tracks would furnish iron enough to
+belt the globe. In Illinois there are ten thousand miles of
+railways. In these iron highways more than three hundred million
+dollars have been invested&mdash;a sum equal to ten times the
+original cost of all the land in the State. To make war upon the
+railroads is a short-sighted and suicidal policy. They should be
+treated fairly and should be taxed by the same standard that farms
+are taxed, and in no other way. If we wish to prosper we must act
+together, and we must see to it that every form of labor is
+protected.</p>
+<p>There has been a long period of depression in all business. The
+farmers have suffered least of all. Your land is just as rich and
+productive as ever. Prices have been reasonable. The towns and
+cities have suffered. Stocks and bonds have shrunk from par to
+worthless paper. Princes have become paupers, and bankers,
+merchants and millionaires have passed into the oblivion of
+bankruptcy. The period of depression is slowly passing away, and we
+are entering upon better times.</p>
+<p>A great many people say that a scarcity of money is our only
+difficulty. In my opinion we have money enough, but we lack
+confidence in each other and in the future.</p>
+<p>There has been so much dishonesty, there have been so many
+failures, that the people are afraid to trust anybody. There is
+plenty of money, but there seems to be a scarcity of business. If
+you were to go to the owner of a ferry, and, upon seeing his boat
+lying high and dry on the shore, should say, "There is a
+superabundance of ferryboat," he would probably reply, "No, but
+there is a scarcity of water." So with us there is not a scarcity
+of money, but there is a scarcity of business. And this scarcity
+springs from lack of confidence in one another. So many presidents
+of savings banks, even those belonging to the Young Men's Christian
+Association, run off with the funds; so many railroad and insurance
+companies are in the hands of receivers; there is so much
+bankruptcy on every hand, that all capital is held in the nervous
+clutch of fear. Slowly, but surely we are coming back to honest
+methods in business. Confidence will return, and then enterprise
+will unlock the safe and money will again circulate as of yore; the
+dollars will leave their hiding places and every one will be
+seeking investment.</p>
+<p>For my part, I do not ask any interference on the part of the
+Government except to undo the wrong it has done. I do not ask that
+money be made out of nothing. I do not ask for the prosperity born
+of paper. But I do ask for the remonetization of silver. Silver was
+demonetized by fraud. It was an imposition upon every solvent man;
+a fraud upon every honest debtor in the United States. It
+assassinated labor. It was done in the interest of avarice and
+greed, and should be undone by honest men.</p>
+<p>The farmers should vote only for such men as are able and
+willing to guard and advance the interests of labor. We should know
+better than to vote for men who will deliberately put a tariff of
+three dollars a thousand upon Canada lumber, when every farmer in
+Illinois is a purchaser of lumber. People who live upon the
+prairies ought to vote for cheap lumber. We should protect
+ourselves. We ought to have intelligence enough to know what we
+want and how to get it. The real laboring men of this country can
+succeed if they are united. By laboring men, I do not mean only the
+farmers. I mean all who contribute in some way to the general
+welfare. They should forget prejudices and party names, and
+remember only the best interests of the people. Let us see if we
+cannot, in Illinois, protect every department of industry. Let us
+see if all property cannot be protected alike and taxed alike,
+whether owned by individuals or corporations.</p>
+<p>Where industry creates and justice protects, prosperity
+dwells.</p>
+<p>Let me tell you something more about Illinois. We have fifty-six
+thousand square miles of land&mdash;nearly thirty-six million
+acres. Upon these plains we can raise enough to feed and clothe
+twenty million people. Beneath these prairies were hidden millions
+of ages ago, by that old miser, the sun, thirty-six thousand square
+miles of coal. The aggregate thickness of these veins is at least
+fifteen feet. Think of a column of coal one mile square and one
+hundred miles high! All this came from the sun. What a sunbeam such
+a column would be! Think of the engines and machines this coal will
+run and turn and whirl! Think of all this force, willed and left to
+us by the dead morning of the world! Think of the firesides of the
+future around which will sit the fathers, mothers and children of
+the years to be! Think of the sweet and happy faces, the loving and
+tender eyes that will glow and gleam in the sacred light of all
+these flames!</p>
+<p>We have the best country in the world, and Illinois is the best
+State in that country. Is there any reason that our farmers should
+not be prosperous and happy men? They have every advantage, and
+within their reach are all the comforts and conveniences of
+life.</p>
+<p>Do not get the land fever and think you must buy all that joins
+you. Get out of debt as soon as you possibly can. A mortgage casts
+a shadow on the sunniest field. There is no business under the sun
+that can pay ten per cent.</p>
+<p>Ainsworth R. Spofford gives the following facts about interest:
+"One dollar loaned for one hundred years at six per cent., with the
+interest collected annually and added to the principal, will amount
+to three hundred and forty dollars. At eight per cent, it amounts
+to two thousand two hundred and three dollars. At three per cent,
+it amounts only to nineteen dollars and twenty-five cents. At ten
+per cent, it is thirteen thousand eight hundred and nine dollars,
+or about seven hundred times as much. At twelve per cent, it
+amounts to eighty-four thousand and seventy-five dollars, or more
+than four thousand times as much. At eighteen per cent, it amounts
+to fifteen million one hundred and forty-five thousand and seven
+dollars. At twenty-four per cent, (which we sometimes hear talked
+of) it reaches the enormous sum of two billion five hundred and
+fifty-one million seven hundred and ninety-nine thousand four
+hundred and four dollars."</p>
+<p>One dollar at compound interest, at twenty-four per cent., for
+one hundred years, would produce a sum equal to our national
+debt.</p>
+<p>Interest eats night and day, and the more it eats the hungrier
+it grows. The farmer in debt, lying awake at night, can, if he
+listens, hear it gnaw. If he owes nothing, he can hear his corn
+grow. Get out of debt as soon as you possibly can. You have
+supported idle avarice and lazy economy long enough.</p>
+<p>Above all let every farmer treat his wife and children with
+infinite kindness. Give your sons and daughters every advantage
+within your power. In the air of kindness they will grow about you
+like flowers. They will fill your homes with sunshine and all your
+years with joy. Do not try to rule by force. A blow from a parent
+leaves a scar on the soul. I should feel ashamed to die surrounded
+by children I had whipped. Think of feeling upon your dying lips
+the kiss of a child you had struck.</p>
+<p>See to it that your wife has every convenience. Make her life
+worth living. Never allow her to become a servant. Wives, weary and
+worn, mothers, wrinkled and bent before their time, fill homes with
+grief and shame. If you are not able to hire help for your wives,
+help them yourselves. See that they have the best utensils to work
+with.</p>
+<p>Women cannot create things by magic. Have plenty of wood and
+coal&mdash;good cellars and plenty in them. Have cisterns, so that
+you can have plenty of rain water for washing. Do not rely on a
+barrel and a board. When the rain comes the board will be lost or
+the hoops will be off the barrel.</p>
+<p>Farmers should live like princes. Eat the best things you raise
+and sell the rest. Have good things to cook and good things to cook
+with. Of all people in our country, you should live the best. Throw
+your miserable little stoves out of the window. Get ranges, and
+have them so built that your wife need not burn her face off to get
+you a breakfast. Do not make her cook in a kitchen hot as the
+orthodox perdition. The beef, not the cook, should be roasted. It
+is just as easy to have things convenient and right as to have them
+any other way.</p>
+<p>Cooking is one of the fine arts. Give your wives and daughters
+things to cook, and things to cook with, and they will soon become
+most excellent cooks. Good cooking is the basis of civilization.
+The man whose arteries and veins are filled with rich blood made of
+good and well cooked food, has pluck, courage, endurance and and
+noble impulses. The inventor of a good soup did more for his race
+than the maker of any creed. The doctrines of total depravity and
+endless punishment were born of bad cooking and dyspepsia. Remember
+that your wife should have the things to cook with.</p>
+<p>In the good old days there would be eleven children in the
+family and only one skillet. Everything was broken or cracked or
+loaned or lost.</p>
+<p>There ought to be a law making it a crime, punishable by
+imprisonment, to fry beefsteak. Broil it; it is just as easy, and
+when broiled it is delicious. Fried beefsteak is not fit for a wild
+beast. You can broil even on a stove. Shut the front
+damper&mdash;open the back one&mdash;then take off a griddle. There
+will then be a draft downwards through this opening. Put on your
+steak, using a wire broiler, and not a particle of smoke will touch
+it, for the reason that the smoke goes down. If you try to broil it
+with the front damper open, the smoke will rise. For broiling,
+coal, even soft coal, makes a better fire than wood.</p>
+<p>There is no reason why farmers should not have fresh meat all
+the year round. There is certainly no sense in stuffing yourself
+full of salt meat every morning, and making a well or a cistern of
+your stomach for the rest of the day. Every farmer should have an
+ice house. Upon or near every farm is some stream from which plenty
+of ice can be obtained, and the long summer days made delightful.
+Dr. Draper, one of the world's greatest scientists, says that ice
+water is healthy, and that it has done away with many of the low
+forms of fever in the great cities. Ice has become one of the
+necessaries of civilized life, and without it there is very little
+comfort.</p>
+<p>Make your homes pleasant. Have your houses warm and comfortable
+for the winter. Do not build a story-and-a-half house. The half
+story is simply an oven in which, during the summer, you will bake
+every night, and feel in the morning as though only the rind of
+yourself was left.</p>
+<p>Decorate your rooms, even if you do so with cheap engravings.
+The cheapest are far better than none. Have books&mdash;have
+papers, and read them. You have more leisure than the dwellers in
+cities. Beautify your grounds with plants and flowers and vines.
+Have good gardens. Remember that everything of beauty tends to the
+elevation of man. Every little morning-glory whose purple bosom is
+thrilled with the amorous kisses of the sun, tends to put a blossom
+in your heart. Do not judge of the value of everything by the
+market reports. Every flower about a house certifies to the
+refinement of somebody. Every vine climbing and blossoming, tells
+of love and joy.</p>
+<p>Make your houses comfortable. Do not huddle together in a little
+room around a red-hot stove, with every window fastened down. Do
+not live in this poisoned atmosphere, and then, when one of your
+children dies, put a piece in the papers commencing with, "Whereas,
+it has pleased divine Providence to remove from our midst&mdash;."
+Have plenty of air, and plenty of warmth. Comfort is health. Do not
+imagine anything is unhealthy simply because it is pleasant. That
+is an old and foolish idea.</p>
+<p>Let your children sleep. Do not drag them from their beds in the
+darkness of night. Do not compel them to associate all that is
+tiresome, irksome and dreadful with cultivating the soil. In this
+way you bring farming into hatred and disrepute. Treat your
+children with infinite kindness&mdash;treat them as equals. There
+is no happiness in a home not filled with love. Where the husband
+hates his wife&mdash;where the wife hates the husband; where
+children hate their parents and each other&mdash;there is a hell
+upon earth.</p>
+<p>There is no reason why farmers should not be the kindest and
+most cultivated of men. There is nothing in plowing the fields to
+make men cross, cruel and crabbed. To look upon the sunny slopes
+covered with daisies does not tend to make men unjust. Whoever
+labors for the happiness of those he loves, elevates himself, no
+matter whether he works in the dark and dreary shops, or in the
+perfumed fields. To work for others is, in reality, the only way in
+which a man can work for himself. Selfishness is ignorance.
+Speculators cannot make unless somebody loses. In the realm of
+speculation, every success has at least one victim. The harvest
+reaped by the farmer benefits all and injures none. For him to
+succeed, it is not necessary that some one should fail. The same is
+true of all producers&mdash;of all laborers.</p>
+<p>I can imagine no condition that carries with it such a promise
+of joy as that of the farmer in the early winter. He has his cellar
+filled&mdash;he has made every preparation for the days of snow and
+storm&mdash;he looks forward to three months of ease and rest; to
+three months of fireside-content; three months with wife and
+children; three months of long, delightful evenings; three months
+of home; three months of solid comfort.</p>
+<p>When the life of the farmer is such as I have described, the
+cities and towns will not be filled with want&mdash;the streets
+will not be crowded with wrecked rogues, broken bankers, and
+bankrupt speculators. The fields will be tilled, and country
+villages, almost hidden by trees and vines and flowers, filled with
+industrious and happy people, will nestle in every vale and gleam
+like gems on every plain.</p>
+<p>The idea must be done away with that there is something
+intellectually degrading in cultivating the soil. Nothing can be
+nobler than to be useful. Idleness should not be respectable.</p>
+<p>If farmers will cultivate well, and without waste; if they will
+so build that their houses will be warm in winter and cool in
+summer; if they will plant trees and beautify their homes; if they
+will occupy their leisure in reading, in thinking, in improving
+their minds and in devising ways and means to make their business
+profitable and pleasant; if they will live nearer together and
+cultivate sociability; if they will come together often; if they
+will have reading rooms and cultivate music; if they will have
+bath-rooms, ice-houses and good gardens; if their wives can have an
+easy time; if their sons and daughters can have an opportunity to
+keep in line with the thoughts and discoveries of the world; if the
+nights can be taken for sleep and the evenings for enjoyment,
+everybody will be in love with the fields. Happiness should be the
+object of life, and if life on the farm can be made really happy,
+the children will grow up in love with the meadows, the streams,
+the woods and the old home. Around the farm will cling and cluster
+the happy memories of the delighful years.</p>
+<p>Remember, I pray you, that you are in partnership with all
+labor&mdash;that you should join hands with all the sons and
+daughters of toil, and that all who work belong to the same noble
+family.</p>
+<p>For my part, I envy the man who has lived on the same broad
+acres from his boyhood, who cultivates the fields where in youth he
+played, and lives where his father lived and died.</p>
+<p>I can imagine no sweeter way to end one's life</p>
+<a name="link0014"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>WHAT MUST WE DO TO BE SAVED?</h2>
+<a name="linkPREF"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>PREFACE</h2>
+<p>If what is known as the Christian Religion is true, nothing can
+be more wonderful than the fact that Matthew, Mark and Luke say
+nothing about "salvation by faith;" that they do not even hint at
+the doctrine of the atonement, and are as silent as empty tombs as
+to the necessity of believing anything to secure happiness in this
+world or another.</p>
+<p>For a good many years it has been claimed that the writers of
+these gospels knew something about the teachings of Christ, and
+had, at least, a general knowledge of the conditions of salvation.
+It now seems to be substantiated that the early Christians did not
+place implicit confidence in the gospels, and did not hesitate to
+make such changes and additions as they thought proper. Such
+changes and additions are about the only passages in the New
+Testament that the Evangelical Churches now consider sacred. That
+portion of the last chapter of Mark, in which unbelievers are so
+cheerfully and promptly damned, has been shown to be an
+interpolation, and it is asserted that in the revised edition of
+the New Testament, soon to be issued, the infamous passages will
+not appear. With these expunged, there is not one word in Matthew,
+Mark, or Luke, even tending to show that belief in Christ has, or
+can have, any effect upon the destiny of the soul.</p>
+<p>The four gospels are the four corner-stones upon which rests the
+fabric of orthodox Christianity. Three of these stones have
+crumbled, and the fourth is not likely to outlast this generation.
+The gospel of John cannot alone uphold the infinite absurdity of
+vicarious virtue and vice, and it cannot, without the aid of
+"interpolation," sustain the illogical and immoral dogma of
+salvation by faith. These frightful doctrines must be abandoned;
+the miraculous must be given up, the wonderful stories must be
+expunged, and from the creed of noble deeds the forgeries of
+superstition must be blotted out. From the temple of Morality and
+Truth&mdash;from the great windows towards the sun&mdash;the
+parasitic and poisonous vines of faith and fable must be torn.</p>
+<p>The church will be compelled at last to rest its case, not upon
+the wonders Christ is said to have performed, but upon the system
+of morality he taught. All the miracles, including the resurrection
+and ascension, are, when compared with portions of the "Sermon on
+the Mount," but dust and darkness.</p>
+<p>The careful reader of the New Testament will find three Christs
+described:&mdash;One who wished to preserve Judaism&mdash;one who
+wished to reform it, and one who built a system of his own. The
+apostles and their disciples, utterly unable to comprehend a
+religion that did away with sacrifices, churches, priests, and
+creeds, constructed a Christianity for themselves, so that the
+orthodox churches of to-day rest&mdash;first, upon what Christ
+endeavored to destroy&mdash;second, upon what he never said, and,
+third, upon a misunderstanding of what he did say.</p>
+<p>If a certain belief is necessary to insure the salvation of the
+soul, the church ought to explain, and without any unnecessary
+delay, why such an infinitely important fact was utterly ignored by
+Matthew, Mark and Luke. There are only two explanations possible.
+Either belief is unnecessary, or the writers of these three gospels
+did not understand the Christian system. The "sacredness" of the
+subject cannot longer hide the absurdity of the "scheme of
+salvation," nor the failure of Matthew, Mark and Luke to mention,
+what is now claimed to have been, the entire mission of Christ. The
+church must take from the New Testament the supernatural'; the idea
+that an intellectual conviction can subject an honest man to
+eternal pain&mdash;the awful doctrine that the innocent can justly
+suffer for the guilty, and allow the remainder to be discussed,
+denied or believed without punishment and without reward. No one
+will object to the preaching of kindness, honesty and justice. To
+preach less is a crime, and to practice more is impossible.</p>
+<p>There is one thing that ought to be again impressed upon the
+average theologian, and that is the utter futility of trying to
+answer arguments with personal abuse. It should be understood once
+for all that these questions are in no sense personal. If it should
+turn out that all the professed Christians in the world are sinless
+saints, the question of how Matthew, Mark, and Luke, came to say
+nothing about the atonement and the scheme of salvation by faith,
+would still be asked. And if it should then be shown that all the
+doubters, deists, and atheists, are vile and vicious wretches, the
+question still would wait for a reply.</p>
+<p>The origin of all religions, creeds, and sacred books, is
+substantially the same, and the history of one, is, in the main,
+the history of all. Thus far these religions have been the mistaken
+explanations of our surroundings. The appearances of nature have
+imposed upon the ignorance and fear of man. But back of all honest
+creeds was, and is, the desire to know, to understand, and to
+explain, and that desire will, as I most fervently hope and
+earnestly believe, be gratified at last by the discovery of the
+truth. Until then, let us bear with the theories, hopes, dreams,
+mistakes, and honest thoughts of all.</p>
+<p>Robert G. Ingersoll.</p>
+<p>Washington, D. C.,</p>
+<p>October, 1880.</p>
+<center>WHAT MUST WE DO TO BE SAVED?</center>
+<p>"THE NUREMBERG MAN WAS OPERATED BY A COMBINATION OF PIPES AND
+LEVERS, AND THOUGH HE COULD BREATHE AND DIGEST PERFECTLY, AND EVEN
+REASON AS WELL AS MOST THEOLOGIANS, WAS MADE OF NOTHING BUT WOOD
+AND LEATHER."</p>
+<p>THE whole world has been filled with fear.</p>
+<p>Ignorance has been the refuge of the soul. For thousands of
+years the intellectual ocean was ravaged by the buccaneers of
+reason. Pious souls clung to the shore and looked at the
+lighthouse. The seas were filled with monsters and the islands with
+sirens. The people were driven in the middle of a narrow road while
+priests went before, beating the hedges on either side to frighten
+the robbers from their lairs. The poor followers seeing no robbers,
+thanked their brave leaders with all their hearts.</p>
+<a name="link0016"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>I. WHAT WE MUST DO TO BE SAVED</h2>
+<p>Huddled in folds they listened with wide eyes while the
+shepherds told of ravening wolves. With great gladness they
+exchanged their fleeces for security. Shorn and shivering, they had
+the happiness of seeing their protectors comfortable and warm.</p>
+<p>Through all the years, those who plowed divided with those who
+prayed. Wicked industry supported pious idleness, the hut gave to
+the cathedral, and frightened poverty gave even its rags to buy a
+robe for hypocrisy.</p>
+<p>Fear is the dungeon of the mind, and superstition is a dagger
+with which hypocrisy assassinates the soul. Courage is liberty. I
+am in favor of absolute freedom of thought. In the realm of mind
+every one is monarch; every one is robed, sceptered, and crowned,
+and every one wears the purple of authority. I belong to the
+republic of intellectual liberty, and only those are good citizens
+of that republic who depend upon reason and upon persuasion, and
+only those are traitors who resort to brute force.</p>
+<p>Now, I beg of you all to forget just for a few moments that you
+are Methodists or Baptists or Catholics or Presbyterians, and let
+us for an hour or two remember only that we are men and women. And
+allow me to say "man" and "woman" are the highest titles that can
+be bestowed upon humanity.</p>
+<p>Let us, if possible, banish all fear from the mind. Do not
+imagine that there is some being in the infinite expanse who is not
+willing that every man and woman should think for himself and
+herself. Do not imagine that there is any being who would give to
+his children the holy torch of reason, and then damn them for
+following that sacred light. Let us have courage.</p>
+<p>Priests have invented a crime called "blasphemy," and behind
+that crime hypocrisy has crouched for thousands of years. There is
+but one blasphemy, and that is injustice. There is but one worship,
+and that is justice!</p>
+<p>You need not fear the anger of a god that you cannot injure.
+Rather fear to injure your fellow-men. Do not be afraid of a crime
+you can not commit. Rather be afraid of the one that you may
+commit. The reason that you cannot injure God is that the Infinite
+is conditionless. You cannot increase or diminish the happiness of
+any being without changing that being's condition. If God is
+conditionless, you can neither injure nor benefit him.</p>
+<p>There was a Jewish gentleman went into a restaurant to get his
+dinner, and the devil of temptation whispered in his ear: "Eat some
+bacon." He knew if there was anything in the universe calculated to
+excite the wrath of an infinite being, who made every shining star,
+it was to see a gentleman eating bacon. He knew it, and he knew the
+infinite being was looking, that he was the eternal eavesdropper of
+the universe. But his appetite got the better of his conscience, as
+it often has with us all, and he ate that bacon. He knew it was
+wrong, and his conscience felt the blood of shame in its cheek.
+When he went into that restaurant the weather was delightful, the
+sky was as blue as June, and when he came out the sky was covered
+with angry clouds, the lightning leaping from one to the other, and
+the earth shaking beneath the voice of the thunder. He went back
+into that restaurant with a face as white as milk, and he said to
+one of the keepers:</p>
+<p>"My God, did you ever hear such a fuss about a little piece of
+bacon?"</p>
+<p>As long as we harbor such opinions of infinity; as long as we
+imagine the heavens to be filled with such tyranny, just so long
+the sons of men will be cringing, intellectual cowards. Let us
+think, and let us honestly express our thought.</p>
+<p>Do not imagine for a moment that I think people who disagree
+with me are bad people. I admit, and I cheerfully admit, that a
+very large proportion of mankind, and a very large majority, a vast
+number are reasonably honest. I believe that most Christians
+believe what they teach; that most ministers are endeavoring to
+make this world better. I do not pretend to be better than they
+are. It is an intellectual question. It is a question, first, of
+intellectual liberty, and after that, a question to be settled at
+the bar of human reason. I do not pretend to be better than they
+are. Probably I am a good deal worse than many of them, but that is
+not the question. The question is: Bad as I am, have I the right to
+think? And I think I have for two reasons: First, I cannot help it.
+And secondly, I like it. The whole question is right at a point. If
+I have not a right to express my thoughts, who has?</p>
+<p>"Oh," they say, "we will allow you to think, we will not burn
+you."</p>
+<p>"All right; why won't you burn me?"</p>
+<p>"Because we think a decent man will allow others to think and to
+express his thought."</p>
+<p>"Then the reason you do not persecute me for my thought is that
+you believe it would be infamous in you?"</p>
+<p>"Yes."</p>
+<p>"And yet you worship a God who will, as you declare, punish me
+forever?"</p>
+<p>Surely an infinite God ought to be as just as man. Surely no God
+can have the right to punish his children for being honest. He
+should not reward hypocrisy with heaven, and punish candor with
+eternal pain.</p>
+<p>The next question then is: Can I commit a sin against God by
+thinking? If God did not intend I should think, why did he give me
+a thinker? For one, I am convinced, not only that I have the right
+to think, but that it is my duty to express my honest thoughts.
+Whatever the gods may say we must be true to ourselves.</p>
+<p>We have got what they call the Christian system of religion, and
+thousands of people wonder how I can be wicked enough to attack
+that system.</p>
+<p>There are many good things about it, and I shall never attack
+anything that I believe to be good! I shall never fear to attack
+anything I honestly believe to be wrong! We have what they call the
+Christian religion, and I find, just in proportion that nations
+have been religious, just in the proportion they have clung to the
+religion of their founders, they have gone back to barbarism. I
+find that Spain, Portugal, Italy, are the three worst nations in
+Europe. I find that the nation nearest infidel is the most
+prosperous&mdash;France.</p>
+<p>And so I say there can be no danger in the exercise of absolute
+intellectual freedom. I find among ourselves the men who think are
+at least as good as those who do not.</p>
+<p>We have, I say, a Christian system, and that system is founded
+upon what they are pleased to call the "New Testament." Who wrote
+the New Testament? I do not know. Who does know? Nobody. We have
+found many manuscripts containing portions of the New Testament.
+Some of these manuscripts leave out five or six books&mdash;many of
+them. Others more; others less. No two of these manuscripts agree.
+Nobody knows who wrote these manuscripts. They are all written in
+Greek. The disciples of Christ, so far as we know, knew only
+Hebrew. Nobody ever saw so far as we know, one of the original
+Hebrew manuscripts.</p>
+<p>Nobody ever saw anybody who had seen anybody who had heard of
+anybody that had ever seen anybody that had ever seen one of the
+original Hebrew manuscripts. No doubt the clergy of your city have
+told you these facts thousands of times, and they will be obliged
+to me for having repeated them once more. These manuscripts are
+written in what are called capital Greek letters. They are called
+Uncial manuscripts, and the New Testament was not divided into
+chapters and verses, even, until the year of grace 1551. In the
+original the manuscripts and gospels are signed by nobody. The
+epistles are addressed to nobody; and they are signed by the same
+person. All the addresses, all the pretended ear-marks showing to
+whom they were written, and by whom they were written, are simply
+interpolations, and everybody who has studied the subject knows
+it.</p>
+<p>It is further admitted that even these manuscripts have not been
+properly translated, and they have a syndicate now making a new
+translation; and I suppose that I can not tell whether I really
+believe the New Testament or not until I see that new
+translation.</p>
+<p>You must remember, also, one other thing. Christ never wrote a
+solitary word of the New Testament&mdash;not one word. There is an
+account that he once stooped and wrote something in the sand, but
+that has not been preserved. He never told anybody to write a word.
+He never said: "Matthew, remember this. Mark, do not forget to put
+that down. Luke, be sure that in your gospel you have this. John,
+do not forget it." Not one word. And it has always seemed to me
+that a being coming from another world, with a message of infinite
+importance to mankind, should at least have verified that message
+by his own signature. Is it not wonderful that not one word was
+written by Christ? Is it not strange that he gave no orders to have
+his words preserved&mdash;words upon which hung the salvation of a
+world?</p>
+<p>Why was nothing written? I will tell you. In my judgment they
+expected the end of the world in a few days. That generation was
+not to pass away until the heavens should be rolled up as a scroll,
+and until the earth should melt with fervent heat. That was their
+belief. They believed that the world was to be destroyed, and that
+there was to be another coming, and that the saints were then to
+govern the earth. And they even went so far among the apostles, as
+we frequently do now before election, as to divide out the offices
+in advance. This Testament, as it now is, was not written for
+hundreds of years after the apostles were dust. Many of the
+pretended facts lived in the open mouth of credulity. They were in
+the wastebaskets of forgetfulness. They depended upon the
+inaccuracy of legend, and for centuries these doctrines and stories
+were blown about by the inconstant winds. And when reduced to
+writing, some gentleman would write by the side of the passage his
+idea of it, and the next copyist would put that in as a part of the
+text. And, when it was mostly written, and the church got into
+trouble, and wanted a passage to help it out, one was interpolated
+to order. So that now it is among the easiest things in the world
+to pick out at least one hundred interpolations in the Testament.
+And I will pick some of them out before I get through.</p>
+<p>And let me say here, once for all, that for the man Christ I
+have infinite respect. Let me say, once for all, that the place
+where man has died for man is holy ground. And let me say, once for
+all, that to that great and serene man I gladly pay, I gladly pay,
+the tribute of my admiration and my tears. He was a reformer in his
+day. He was an infidel in his time. He was regarded as a
+blasphemer, and his life was destroyed by hypocrites, who have, in
+all ages, done what they could to trample freedom and manhood out
+of the human mind. Had I lived at that time I would have been his
+friend, and should he come again he will not find a better friend
+than I will be.</p>
+<p>That is for the man. For the theological creation I have a
+different feeling. If he was, in fact, God, he knew there was no
+such thing as death. He knew that what we called death was but the
+eternal opening of the golden gates of everlasting joy; and it took
+no heroism to face a death that was eternal life.</p>
+<p>But when a man, when a poor boy sixteen years of age, goes upon
+the field of battle to keep his flag in heaven, not knowing but
+that death ends all; not knowing but that when the shadows creep
+over him, the darkness will be eternal, there is heroism. For the
+man who, in the darkness, said: "My God, why hast thou forsaken
+me?"&mdash;for that man I have nothing but respect, admiration, and
+love. Back of the theological shreds, rags, and patches, hiding the
+real Christ, I see a genuine man.</p>
+<p>A while ago I made up my mind to find out what was necessary for
+me to do in order to be saved. If I have got a soul, I want it
+saved. I do not wish to lose anything that is of value.</p>
+<p>For thousands of years the world has been asking that
+question:</p>
+<p>"What must we do to be saved?"</p>
+<p>Saved from poverty? No. Saved from crime? No. Tyranny? No. But
+"What must we do to be saved from the eternal wrath of the God who
+made us all?"</p>
+<p>If God made us, he will not destroy us. Infinite wisdom never
+made a poor investment. Upon all the works of an infinite God, a
+dividend must finally be declared. Why should God make failures?
+Why should he waste material? Why should he not correct his
+mistakes, instead of damning them? The pulpit has cast a shadow
+over even the cradle. The doctrine of endless punishment has
+covered the cheeks of this world with tears. I despise it, and I
+defy it.</p>
+<p>I made up my mind, I say, to see what I had to do in order to
+save my soul according to the Testament, and thereupon I read it. I
+read the gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and found that the
+church had been deceiving me. I found that the clergy did not
+understand their own book; that they had been building upon
+passages that had been interpolated; upon passages that were
+entirely untrue, and I will tell you why I think so.</p>
+<a name="link0017"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>II. THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW</h2>
+<p>ACCORDING to the church, the first gospel was written by
+Matthew. As a matter of fact he never wrote a word of
+it&mdash;never saw it, never heard of it and probably never will.
+But for the purposes of this lecture I admit that he wrote years;
+that he was his constant companion; that he shared his sorrows and
+his triumphs; that he heard his words by the lonely lakes, the
+barren hills, in synagogue and street, and that he knew his heart
+and became acquainted with his thoughts and aims.</p>
+<p>Now let us see what Matthew says we must do in order to be
+saved. And I take it that, if this is true, Matthew is as good
+authority as any minister in the world.</p>
+<p>I will admit that he was with Christ for three years.</p>
+<p>The first thing I find upon the subject of salvation is in the
+fifth chapter of Matthew, and is embraced in what is commonly known
+as the Sermon on the Mount. It is as follows:</p>
+<p>"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of
+heaven." Good!</p>
+<p>"Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy." Good!
+Whether they belonged to any church or not; whether they believed
+the Bible or not?</p>
+<p>"Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy."
+Good!</p>
+<p>"Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. Blessed
+are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.
+Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness sake, for
+theirs is the kingdom of heaven." Good!</p>
+<p>In the same sermon he says: "Think not that I am come to destroy
+the law or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."
+And then he makes use of this remarkable language, almost as
+applicable to-day as it was then: "For I say unto you that except
+your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes
+and Pharisees ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of
+heaven." Good!</p>
+<p>In the sixth chapter I find the following, and it comes directly
+after the prayer known as the Lord's prayer:</p>
+<p>"For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your Heavenly Father
+will also forgive you; but if ye forgive not men their trespasses,
+neither will your father forgive your trespasses."</p>
+<p>I accept the condition. There is an offer; I accept it. If you
+will forgive men that trespass against you, God will forgive your
+trespasses against him. I accept the terms, and I never will ask
+any God to treat me better than I treat my fellow-men. There is a
+square promise. There is a contract. If you will forgive others God
+will forgive you. And it does not say you must believe in the Old
+Testament, or be baptized, or join the church, or keep Sunday; that
+you must count beads, or pray, or become a nun, or a priest; that
+you must preach sermons or hear them, build churches or fill them.
+Not one word is said about eating or fasting, denying or believing.
+It simply says, if you forgive others God will forgive you; and it
+must of necessity be true. No god could afford to damn a forgiving
+man. Suppose God should damn to everlasting fire a man so great and
+good, that he, looking from the abyss of hell, would forgive
+God,&mdash;how would a god feel then?</p>
+<p>Now let me make myself plain upon one subject, perfectly plain.
+For instance, I hate Presbyterianism, but I know hundreds of
+splendid Presbyterians. Understand me. I hate Methodism, and yet I
+know hundreds of splendid Methodists. I hate Catholicism, and like
+Catholics. I hate insanity but not the insane.</p>
+<p>I do not war against men. I do not war against persons. I war
+against certain doctrines that I believe to be wrong. But I give to
+every other human being every right that I claim for myself.</p>
+<p>The next thing that I find is in the seventh chapter and the
+second verse: "For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged;
+and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again."
+Good! That suits me!</p>
+<p>And in the twelfth chapter of Matthew: "For whosoever shall do
+the will of my Father that is in heaven, the same is my brother and
+sister and mother. For the son of man shall come in the glory of
+his father with his angels, and then he shall reward every man
+according.... To the church he belongs to? No. To the manner in
+which he was baptized? No. According to his creed? No. Then he
+shall reward every man according to his works." Good! I subscribe
+to that doctrine.</p>
+<p>And in the eighteenth chapter: "And Jesus called a little child
+to him and stood him in the midst; and said, 'Verily I say unto
+you, except ye be converted and become as little children, ye shall
+not enter into the kingdom of heaven.'" I do not wonder that in his
+day, surrounded by scribes and Pharisees, he turned lovingly to
+little children.</p>
+<p>And yet, see what children the little children of God have been.
+What an interesting dimpled darling John Calvin was. Think of that
+prattling babe, Jonathan Edwards! Think of the infants that founded
+the Inquisition, that invented instruments of torture to tear human
+flesh. They were the ones who had become as little children. They
+were the children of faith.</p>
+<p>So I find in the nineteenth chapter: "And behold, one came and
+said unto him: 'Good master, what good thing shall I do that I may
+have eternal life?' And he said unto him, 'Why callest thou me
+good? There is none good but one, that is God: but if thou wilt
+enter into life, keep the commandments.' He saith unto him,
+'which?'"</p>
+<p>Now, there is a fair issue. Here is a child of God asking God
+what is necessary for him to do in order to inherit eternal life.
+And God said to him: Keep the commandments. And the child said to
+the Almighty: "Which?" Now, if there ever has been an opportunity
+given to the Almighty to furnish a man of an inquiring mind with
+the necessary information upon that subject, here was the
+opportunity. "He said unto him, which? And Jesus said: Thou shalt
+do no murder; thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not steal;
+thou shalt not bear false witness; honor thy father and mother; and
+thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."</p>
+<p>He did not say to him: "You must believe in me&mdash;that I am
+the only begotten son of the living God." He did not say: "You must
+be born again." He did not say: "You must believe the Bible." He
+did not say: "You must remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy."
+He simply said: "Thou shalt do no murder. Thou shalt not commit
+adultery. Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not bear false witness.
+Honor thy father and thy mother; and thou shalt love thy neighbor
+as thyself." And thereupon the young man, who I think was mistaken,
+said unto him: "All these things have I kept from my youth up."</p>
+<p>What right has the church to add conditions of salvation? Why
+should we suppose that Christ failed to tell the young man all that
+was necessary for him to do? Is it possible that he left out some
+important thing simply to mislead? Will some minister tell us why
+he thinks that Christ kept back the "scheme"?</p>
+<p>Now comes an interpolation.</p>
+<p>In the old times when the church got a little scarce of money,
+they always put in a passage praising poverty. So they had this
+young man ask: "What lack I yet? And Jesus said unto him: If thou
+wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast and give to the poor,
+and thou shalt have treasure in heaven."</p>
+<p>The church has always been willing to swap off treasures in
+heaven for cash down. And when the next verse was written the
+church must have been nearly bankrupt. "And again I say unto you,
+it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for
+a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God." Did you ever know a
+wealthy disciple to unload on account of that verse?</p>
+<p>And then comes another verse, which I believe is an
+interpolation: "And everyone that hath forsaken houses, or
+brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children,
+or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundred fold, and
+shall inherit everlasting life."</p>
+<p>Christ never said it. Never. "Whosoever shall forsake father and
+mother."</p>
+<p>Why, he said to this man that asked him, "What shall I do to
+inherit eternal life?" among other things, he said: "Honor thy
+father and thy mother." And we turn over the page and he says
+again: "If you will desert your father and mother you shall have
+everlasting life." It will not do. If you will desert your wife and
+your little children, or your lands&mdash;the idea of putting a
+house and lot on equality with wife and children! Think of that! I
+do not accept the terms. I will never desert the one I love for the
+promise of any god.</p>
+<p>It is far more important to love your wife than to love God, and
+I will tell you why. You cannot help him, but you can help her. You
+can fill her life with the perfume of perpetual joy. It is far more
+important that you love your children than that you love Jesus
+Christ. And why? If he is God you cannot help him, but you can
+plant a little flower of happiness in every footstep of the child,
+from the cradle until you die in that child's arms. Let me tell you
+to-day it is far more important to build a home than to erect a
+church. The holiest temple beneath the stars is a home that love
+has built. And the holiest altar in all the wide world is the
+fireside around which gather father and mother and the sweet
+babes.</p>
+<p>There was a time when people believed the infamy commanded in
+this frightful passage. There was a time when they did desert
+fathers and mothers and wives and children. St. Augustine says to
+the devotee: Fly to the desert, and though your wife put her arms
+around your neck, tear her hands away; she is a temptation of the
+devil. Though your father and mother throw their bodies athwart
+your threshold, step over them; and though your children pursue,
+and with weeping' eyes beseech you to return, listen not. It is the
+temptation of the evil one. Fly to the desert and save your soul.
+Think of such a soul being worth saving. While I live I propose to
+stand by the ones I love.</p>
+<p>There is another condition of salvation. I find it in the
+twenty-fifth chapter: "Then shall the King say unto them on his
+right hand, Come, ye blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom
+prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was an
+hungered and ye gave me meat; I was thirsty and ye gave me drink; I
+was a stranger and ye took me in; naked and ye clothed me; I was
+sick and ye visited me; I was in prison and ye came unto me."
+Good!</p>
+<p>I tell you to-night that God will not punish with eternal thirst
+the man who has put the cup of cold water to the lips of his
+neighbor. God will not leave in the eternal nakedness of pain the
+man who has clothed his fellow-men.</p>
+<p>For instance, here is a shipwreck, and here is some brave sailor
+who stands aside and allows a woman whom he never saw before to
+take his place in the boat, and he stands there, grand and serene
+as the wide sea, and he goes down. Do you tell me that there is any
+God who will push the lifeboat from the shore of eternal life, when
+that man wishes to step in? Do you tell me that God can be
+unpitying to the pitiful, that he can be unforgiving to the
+forgiving? I deny it; and from the aspersions of the pulpit I seek
+to rescue the reputation of the Deity.</p>
+<p>Now, I have read you substantially everything in Matthew on the
+subject of salvation. That is all there is. Not one word about
+believing anything. It is the gospel of deed, the gospel of
+charity, the gospel of self-denial; and if only that gospel had
+been preached, persecution never would have shed one drop of blood.
+Not one.</p>
+<p>According to the testimony Matthew was well acquainted with
+Christ. According to the testimony, he had been with him, and his
+companion for years, and if it was necessary to believe anything in
+order to get to heaven, Matthew should have told us. But he forgot
+it, or he did not believe it, or he never heard of it. You can take
+your choice.</p>
+<p>In Matthew, we find that heaven is promised, first, to the poor
+in spirit. Second, to the merciful. Third, to the pure in heart.
+Fourth, to the peacemakers. Fifth, to those who are persecuted for
+righteousness' sake. Sixth, to those who keep and teach the
+commandments. Seventh, to those who forgive men that trespass
+against them. Eighth, that we will be judged as we judge others.
+Ninth, that they who receive prophets and righteous men shall
+receive a prophet's reward. Tenth, to those who do the will of God.
+Eleventh, that every man shall be rewarded according to his works.
+Twelfth, to those who become as little children. Thirteenth, to
+those who forgive the trespasses of others. Fourteenth, to the
+perfect: they who sell all that they have and give to the poor.
+Fifteenth, to them who forsake houses, and brethren, and sisters,
+and father, and mother, and wife, and children, and lands for the
+sake of Christ's name. Sixteenth, to those who feed the hungry,
+give drink to the thirsty, shelter to the stranger, clothes to the
+naked, comfort to the sick, and who visit the prisoner.</p>
+<p>Nothing else is said with regard to salvation in the gospel
+according to St. Matthew. Not one word about believing the Old
+Testament to have been inspired; not one word about being baptized
+or joining a church; not one word about believing in any miracle;
+not even a hint that it was necessary to believe that Christ was
+the son of God, or that he did any wonderful or miraculous things,
+or that he was born of a virgin, or that his coming had been
+foretold by the Jewish prophets. Not one word about believing in
+the Trinity, or in foreordination or predestination. Matthew had
+not understood from Christ that any such things were necessary to
+ensure the salvation of the soul.</p>
+<p>According to the testimony, Matthew had been in the company of
+Christ, some say three years and some say one, but at least he had
+been with him long enough to find out some of his ideas upon this
+great subject. And yet Matthew never got the impression that it was
+necessary to believe something in order to get to heaven. He
+supposed that if a man forgave others God would forgive him; he
+believed that God would show mercy to the merciful; that he would
+not allow those who fed the hungry to starve; that he would not put
+in the flames of hell those who had given cold water to the
+thirsty; that he would not cast into the eternal dungeon of his
+wrath those who had visited the imprisoned; and that he would not
+damn men who forgave others.</p>
+<p>Matthew had it in his mind that God would treat us very much as
+we treated other people; and that in the next world he would treat
+with kindness those who had been loving and gentle in their lives.
+It may be the apostle was mistaken; but evidently that was his
+opinion.</p>
+<a name="link0018"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>III. THE GOSPEL OF MARK</h2>
+<p>ET us now see what Mark thought it necessary for a man to do to
+save his soul. In the fourth chapter, after Jesus had given to the
+multitude by the sea the parable of the sower, his disciples, when
+they were again alone, asked him the meaning of the parable. Jesus
+replied:</p>
+<p>"Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God:
+but unto them that are without, all these things are done in
+parables:</p>
+<p>"That seeing, they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they
+may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be
+converted, and their sins should be forgiven them."</p>
+<p>It is a little hard to understand why he should have preached to
+people that he did not intend should know his meaning. Neither is
+it quite clear why he objected to their being converted. This, I
+suppose, is one of the mysteries that we should simply believe
+without endeavoring to comprehend.</p>
+<p>With the above exception, and one other that I will mention
+hereafter, Mark substantially agrees with Matthew, and says that
+God will be merciful to the merciful, that he will be kind to the
+kind, that he will pity the pitying, and love the loving. Mark
+upholds the religion of Matthew until we come to the fifteenth and
+sixteenth verses of the sixteenth chapter, and then I strike an
+interpolation put in by hypocrisy, put in by priests who longed to
+grasp with bloody hands the sceptre of universal power. Let me read
+it to you. It is the most infamous passage in the Bible. Christ
+never said it. No sensible man ever said it.</p>
+<p>"And He said unto them" (that is, unto his disciples), "go ye
+into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. He that
+believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not
+shall be damned."</p>
+<p>That passage was written so that fear would give alms to
+hypocrisy. Now, I propose to prove to you that this is an
+interpolation. How will I do it? In the first place, not one word
+is said about belief, in Matthew. In the next place, not one word
+about belief, in Mark, until I come to that verse, and where is
+that said to have been spoken? According to Mark, it is a part of
+the last conversation of Jesus Christ,&mdash;just before, according
+to the account, he ascended bodily before their eyes. If there ever
+was any important thing happened in this world that was it. If
+there is any conversation that people would be apt to recollect, it
+would be the last conversation with a god before he rose visibly
+through the air and seated himself upon the throne of the infinite.
+We have in this Testament five accounts of the last conversation
+happening between Jesus Christ and his apostles. Matthew gives it,
+and yet Matthew does not state that in that conversation Christ
+said: "Whoso believeth and is baptized shall be saved, and whoso
+believeth not shall be damned." And if he did say those words they
+were the most important that ever fell from lips. Matthew did not
+hear it, or did not believe it, or forgot it.</p>
+<p>Then I turn to Luke, and he gives an account of this same last
+conversation, and not one word does he say upon that subject. Luke
+does not pretend that Christ said that whoso believeth not shall be
+damned. Luke certainly did not hear it. May be he forgot it.
+Perhaps he did not think that it was worth recording. Now, it is
+the most important thing, if Christ said it, that he ever said.</p>
+<p>Then I turn to John, and he gives an account of the last
+conversation, but not one solitary word on the subject of belief or
+unbelief. Not one solitary word on the subject of damnation. Not
+one. John might not have been listening.</p>
+<p>Then I turn to the first chapter of the Acts, and there I find
+an account of the last conversation; and in that conversation there
+is not one word upon this subject. This is a demonstration that the
+passage in Mark is an interpolation. What other reason have I got?
+There is not one particle of sense in it. Why? No man can control
+his belief. You hear evidence for and against, and the integrity of
+the soul stands at the scales and tells which side rises and which
+side falls. You can not believe as you wish. You must believe as
+you must. And he might as well have said: "Go into the world and
+preach the gospel, and whosoever has red hair shall be saved, and
+whosoever hath not shall be damned."</p>
+<p>I have another reason. I am much obliged to the gentleman who
+interpolated these passages. I am much obliged to him that he put
+in some more&mdash;two more. Now hear:</p>
+<p>"And these signs shall follow them that believe." Good!</p>
+<p>"In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with
+new tongues; they shall take up serpents, and if they drink any
+deadly thing it shall not hurt them. They shall lay hands on the
+sick and they shall recover."</p>
+<p>Bring on your believer! Let him cast out a devil. I do not ask
+for a large one. Just a little one for a cent. Let him take up
+serpents. "And if they drink any deadly thing it shall not hurt
+them." Let me mix up a dose for the believer, and if it does not
+hurt him I will join a church. "Oh! but," they say, "those things
+only lasted through the Apostolic age." Let us see. "Go into all
+the world and preach the gospel, and whosoever believes and is
+baptized shall be saved, and these signs shall follow them that
+believe."</p>
+<p>How long? I think at least until they had gone into all the
+world. Certainly those signs should follow until all the world had
+been visited. And yet if that declaration was in the mouth of
+Christ, he then knew that one-half of the world was unknown, and
+that he would be dead fourteen hundred and fifty-nine years before
+his disciples would know that there was another continent. And yet
+he said, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel," and he knew
+then that it would be fourteen hundred and fifty-nine years before
+anybody could go. Well, if it was worth while to have signs follow
+believers in the Old World, surely it was worth while to have signs
+follow believers in the New. And the very reason that signs should
+follow would be to convince the unbeliever, and there are as many
+unbelievers now as ever, and the signs are as necessary to-day as
+they ever were. I would like a few myself.</p>
+<p>This frightful declaration, "He that believeth and is baptized
+shall be saved, but he that believeth not shall be damned," has
+filled the world with agony and crime. Every letter of this passage
+has been sword and fagot; every word has been dungeon and chain.
+That passage made the sword of persecution drip with innocent blood
+through centuries of agony and crime. That passage made the horizon
+of a thousand years lurid with the fagot's flames. That passage
+contradicts the Sermon on the Mount; travesties the Lord's prayer;
+turns the splendid religion of deed and duty into the superstition
+of creed and cruelty. I deny it. It is infamous! Christ never said
+it!</p>
+<a name="link0019"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>IV. THE GOSPEL OF LUKE.</h2>
+<p>IT is sufficient to say that Luke agrees substantially with
+Matthew and Mark.</p>
+<p>"Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful."
+Good!</p>
+<p>"Judge not and ye shall not be judged: condemn not and ye shall
+not be condemned: forgive and ye shall be forgiven." Good!</p>
+<p>"Give and it shall be given unto you: good measure, pressed
+down, and shaken together, and running over." Good! I like it.</p>
+<p>"For with the same measure that ye mete withal, it shall be
+measured to you again."</p>
+<p>He agrees substantially with Mark; he agrees substantially with
+Matthew; and I come at last to the nineteenth chapter.</p>
+<p>"And Zaccheus stood and said unto the Lord, 'Behold, Lord, the
+half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have taken anything
+from any man by false accusation, I restore him four fold.' And
+Jesus said unto him, 'this day is salvation come to this
+house.'"</p>
+<p>That is good doctrine. He did not ask Zaccheus what he believed.
+He did not ask him, "Do you believe in the Bible? Do you believe in
+the five points? Have you ever been baptized&mdash;sprinkled? Or
+immersed?" "Half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have
+taken anything from any man by false accusation, I restore him four
+fold." "And Christ said, this day is salvation come to this house."
+Good!</p>
+<p>I read also in Luke that Christ when upon the cross forgave his
+murderers, and that is considered the shining gem in the crown of
+his mercy. He forgave his murderers. He forgave the men who drove
+the nails in his hands, in his feet, that plunged a spear in his
+side; the soldier that in the hour of death offered him in mockery
+the bitterness to drink. He forgave them all freely, and yet,
+although he would forgive them, he will in the nineteenth century,
+as we are told by the orthodox church, damn to eternal fire a noble
+man for the expression of his honest thoughts. That will not do. I
+find, too, in Luke, an account of two thieves that were crucified
+at the same time. The other gospels speak of them. One says they
+both railed upon him. Another says nothing about it. In Luke we are
+told that one railed upon him, but one of the thieves looked and
+pitied Christ, and Christ said to that thief:</p>
+<p>"To-day shalt thou be with me in Paradise." Why did he say that?
+Because the thief pitied him. God can not afford to trample beneath
+the feet of his infinite wrath the smallest blossom of pity that
+ever shed its perfume in the human heart!</p>
+<p>Who was this thief? To what church did he belong? I do not know.
+The fact that he was a thief throws no light on that question. Who
+was he? What did he believe? I do not know. Did he believe in the
+Old Testament? In the miracles? I do not know. Did he believe that
+Christ was God? I do not know. Why then was the promise made to him
+that he should meet Christ in Paradise? Simply because he pitied
+suffering innocence upon the cross.</p>
+<p>God can not afford to damn any man who is capable of pitying
+anybody.</p>
+<a name="link0020"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>V. THE GOSPEL OF JOHN</h2>
+<h3>AND now we come to John, and that is where the trouble
+commences.</h3>
+<p>The other gospels teach that God will be merciful to the
+merciful, forgiving to the forgiving, kind to the kind, loving to
+the loving, just to the just, merciful to the good.</p>
+<p>Now we come to John, and here is another doctrine. And allow me
+to say that John was not written until long after the others. John
+was mostly written by the church.</p>
+<p>"Jesus answered and said unto him: Verily, verily, I say unto
+thee, Except a man be born again he can not see the kingdom of
+God."</p>
+<p>Why did he not tell Matthew that? Why did he not tell Luke that?
+Why did he not tell Mark that? They never heard of it, or forgot
+it, or they did not believe it.</p>
+<p>"Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he can not
+enter into the kingdom of God." Why?</p>
+<p>"That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is
+born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye
+must be born again." "That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and
+that which is born of the Spirit is spirit," and he might have
+added, that which is born of water is water.</p>
+<p>"Marvel not that I said unto thee, 'ye must be born again.'" And
+then the reason is given, and I admit I did not understand it
+myself until I read the reason, and when you hear the reason, you
+will understand it as well as I do; and here it is: "The wind
+bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but
+canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth." So, I find
+in the book of John the idea of the Real Presence.</p>
+<p>"And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so
+must the Son of man be lifted up; That whosoever believeth in him
+should not perish, but have eternal life."</p>
+<p>"For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son,
+that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have
+everlasting life.</p>
+<p>"For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world,
+but that the world through him might be saved.</p>
+<p>"He that believeth on him is not condemned; but he that
+believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in
+the name of the only begotten Son of God."</p>
+<p>"He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that
+believeth not the Son, shall not see life; but the wrath of God
+abideth on him." "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth
+my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life,
+and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto
+life.</p>
+<p>"Verily, verily, I say unto you, the hour is coming, and now is,
+when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God; and they that
+hear shall live."</p>
+<p>"And shall come forth; they that have done good unto the
+resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the
+resurrection of damnation."-"And this is the will of him that sent
+me, that everyone which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may
+have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last
+day."</p>
+<p>"No man can come to me, except the Father, which hath sent me,
+draw him; and I will raise him up at the last day."</p>
+<p>"Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that believeth on me hath
+everlasting life.</p>
+<p>"I am that bread of life.</p>
+<p>"Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.</p>
+<p>"This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may
+eat thereof, and not die.</p>
+<p>"I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If any man
+eat of this bread he shall live forever; and the bread that I will
+give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world."</p>
+<p>"Then Jesus said unto them, verily, verily, I say unto you,
+except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, ye
+have no life in you.</p>
+<p>"Whoso eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life;
+and I will raise him up at the last day.</p>
+<p>"For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.</p>
+<p>"He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me,
+and I in him.</p>
+<p>"As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father; so
+he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.</p>
+<p>"This is that bread which came down from heaven; not as your
+fathers did eat manna, and are dead; he that eateth of this bread
+shall live forever."</p>
+<p>"And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come
+unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father."</p>
+<p>"Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection and the life; he
+that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.</p>
+<p>"And whosoever liveth and believeth in me, shall never die."</p>
+<p>"He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his
+life in this world, shall keep it unto life eternal."</p>
+<p>So I find in the book of John, that in order to be saved we must
+not only believe in Jesus Christ, but we must eat the flesh and we
+must drink the blood of Jesus Christ. If that gospel is true, the
+Catholic Church is right. But it is not true. I can not believe it,
+and yet for all that, it may be true. But I do not believe it.
+Neither do I believe there is any god in the universe who will damn
+a man simply for expressing his belief.</p>
+<p>"Why," they say to me, "suppose all this should turn out to be
+true, and you should come to the day of judgment and find all these
+things to be true. What would you do then?" I would walk up like a
+man, and say, "I was mistaken."</p>
+<p>"And suppose God was about to pass judgment upon you, what would
+you say?" I would say to him, "Do unto others as you would that
+others should do unto you." Why not?</p>
+<p>I am told that I must render good for evil. I am told that if
+smitten on one cheek I must turn the other. I am told that I must
+overcome evil with good. I am told that I must love my enemies; and
+will it do for this God who tells me to love my enemies to damn
+his? No, it will not do. It will not do.</p>
+<p>In the book of John all these doctrines of
+regeneration&mdash;that it is necessary to believe in the Lord
+Jesus Christ; that salvation depends upon belief&mdash;in this book
+of John all these doctrines find their warrant; nowhere else.</p>
+<p>Read Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and then read John, and you will
+agree with me that the three first gospels teach that if we are
+kind and forgiving to our fellows, God will be kind and forgiving
+to us. In John we are told that another man can be good for us, or
+bad for us, and that the only way to get to heaven is to believe
+something that we know is not so.</p>
+<p>All these passages about believing in Christ, drinking his blood
+and eating his flesh, are afterthoughts. They were written by the
+theologians, and in a few years they will be considered unworthy of
+the lips of Christ.</p>
+<a name="link0021"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>VI. THE CATHOLICS</h2>
+<p>NOW, upon these gospels that I have read the churches rest; and
+out of these things, mistakes and interpolations, they have made
+their creeds. And the first church to make a creed, so far as I
+know, was the Catholic. It was the first church that had any power.
+That is the church that has preserved all these miracles for us.
+That is the church that preserved the manuscripts for us. That is
+the church whose word we have to take. That church is the first
+witness that Protestantism brought to the bar of history to prove
+miracles that took place eighteen hundred years ago; and while the
+witness is there Protestantism takes pains to say: "You cannot
+believe one word that witness says, <i>now</i>."</p>
+<p>That church is the only one that keeps up a constant
+communication with heaven through the instrumentality of a large
+number of decayed saints. That church has an agent of God on earth,
+has a person who stands in the place of deity; and that church is
+infallible. That church has persecuted to the exact extent of her
+power&mdash;and always will. In Spain that church stands erect, and
+is arrogant. In the United States that church crawls; but the
+object in both countries is the same&mdash;and that is the
+destruction of intellectual liberty. That church teaches us that we
+can make God happy by being miserable ourselves; that a nun is
+holier in the sight of God than a loving mother with her child in
+her thrilled and thrilling arms; that a priest is better than a
+father; that celibacy is better than that passion of love that has
+made everything of beauty in this world. That church tells the girl
+of sixteen or eighteen years of age, with eyes like dew and light;
+that girl with the red of health in the white of her beautiful
+cheeks&mdash;tells that girl, "Put on the veil, woven of death and
+night, kneel upon stones, and you will please God."</p>
+<p>I tell you that, by law, no girl should be allowed to take the
+veil and renounce the joys and beauties of this life.</p>
+<p>I am opposed to allowing these spider-like priests to weave webs
+to catch the loving maidens of the world. There ought to be a law
+appointing commissioners to visit such places twice a year and
+release every person who expresses a desire to be released. I do
+not believe in keeping the penitentiaries of God. No doubt they are
+honest about it. That is not the question. These ignorant
+superstitions fill millions of lives with weariness and pain, with
+agony and tears.</p>
+<p>This church, after a few centuries of thought, made a creed, and
+that creed is the foundation of the orthodox religion. Let me read
+it to you:</p>
+<p>"Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that
+he hold the Catholic faith; which faith except every one do keep
+entire and inviolate, without doubt, he shall everlastingly
+perish." Now the faith is this: "That we worship one God in trinity
+and trinity in unity."</p>
+<p>Of course you understand how that is done, and there is no need
+of my explaining it. "Neither confounding the persons nor dividing
+the substance." You see what a predicament that would leave the
+deity in if you divided the substance.</p>
+<p>"For one is the person of the Father, another of the Son, and
+another of the Holy Ghost; but the Godhead of the Father, and of
+the Son, and of the Holy Ghost is all one"&mdash;you know what I
+mean by Godhead. "In glory equal, and in majesty co&euml;ternal.
+Such as the Father is, such is the Son, such is the Holy Ghost. The
+Father is uncreated, the Son uncreated, the Holy Ghost uncreated.
+The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, the Holy
+Ghost incomprehensible." And that is the reason we know so much
+about the thing. "The Father is eternal, the Son eternal, the Holy
+Ghost eternal, and yet there are not three eternals, only one
+eternal, as also there are not three uncreated, nor three
+incomprehensibles, only one uncreated, one incomprehensible."</p>
+<p>"In like manner, the Father is almighty, the Son almighty, the
+Holy Ghost almighty. Yet there are not three almighties, only one
+Almighty. So the Father is God, the Son God, the Holy Ghost God,
+and yet not three Gods; and so, likewise, the Father is Lord, the
+Son is Lord, the Holy Ghost is Lord, yet there are not three Lords,
+for as we are compelled by the Christian truth to acknowledge every
+person by himself to be God and Lord, so we are all forbidden by
+the Catholic religion to say there are three Gods, or three Lords.
+The Father is made of no one; not created or begotten. The Son is
+from the Father alone, not made, not created, but begotten. The
+Holy Ghost is from the Father and the Son, not made nor begotten,
+but proceeding."</p>
+<p>You know what proceeding is.</p>
+<p>"So there is one Father, not three Fathers." Why should there be
+three fathers, and only one Son? "One Son, and not three Sons; one
+Holy Ghost, not three Holy Ghosts; and in this Trinity there is
+nothing before or afterward, nothing greater or less, but the whole
+three persons are co&euml;ternal with one another and co&euml;qual,
+so that in all things the unity is to be worshiped in Trinity, and
+the Trinity is to be worshiped in unity. Those who will be saved
+must thus think of the Trinity. Furthermore, it is necessary to
+everlasting salvation that he also believe rightly the incarnation
+of our Lord Jesus Christ. Now the right of this thing is this: That
+we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
+is both God and man. He is God of the substance of his Father
+begotten before the world was."</p>
+<p>That was a good while before his mother lived. "And he is man of
+the substance of his mother, born in this world, perfect God and
+perfect man, and the rational soul in human flesh, subsisting equal
+to the Father according to his Godhead, but less than the Father
+according to his manhood, who being both God and man is not two but
+one, one not by conversion of God into flesh, but by the taking of
+the manhood into God." You see that is a great deal easier than the
+other way would be.</p>
+<p>"One altogether, not by a confusion of substance but by unity of
+person, for as the rational soul and the flesh is one man, so God
+and man is one Christ, who suffered for our salvation, descended
+into hell, rose again the third day from the dead, ascended into
+heaven, and he sitteth at the right hand of God, the Father
+Almighty, and He shall come to judge the living and the dead." In
+order to be saved it is necessary to believe this. What a blessing
+that we do not have to understand it. And in order to compel the
+human intellect to get upon its knees before that infinite
+absurdity, thousands and millions have suffered agonies; thousands
+and thousands have perished in dungeons and in fire; and if all the
+bones of all the victims of the Catholic Church could be gathered
+together, a monument higher than all the pyramids would rise, in
+the presence of which the eyes even of priests would be wet with
+tears.</p>
+<p>That church covered Europe with cathedrals and dungeons, and
+robbed men of the jewel of the soul. That church had ignorance upon
+its knees. That church went in partnership with the tyrants of the
+throne, and between those two vultures, the altar and the throne,
+the heart of man was devoured.</p>
+<p>Of course I have met, and cheerfully admit that there are
+thousands of good Catholics; but Catholicism is contrary to human
+liberty. Catholicism bases salvation upon belief. Catholicism
+teaches man to trample his reason under foot. And for that reason
+it is wrong.</p>
+<p>Thousands of volumes could not contain the crimes of the
+Catholic Church. They could not contain even the names of her
+victims. With sword and fire, with rack and chain, with dungeon and
+whip she endeavored to convert the world. In weakness a
+beggar&mdash;in power a highwayman,&mdash;alms dish or
+dagger&mdash;tramp or tyrant.</p>
+<a name="link0022"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>VII. THE EPISCOPALIANS</h2>
+<p>THE next church I wish to speak of is the Episcopalian. That was
+founded by Henry VIII., now in heaven. He cast off Queen Catherine
+and Catholicism together, and he accepted Episcopalianism and Annie
+Boleyn at the same time. That church, if it had a few more
+ceremonies, would be Catholic. If it had a few less, nothing. We
+have an Episcopalian Church in this country, and it has all the
+imperfections of a poor relation. It is always boasting of its rich
+relative. In England the creed is made by law, the same as we pass
+statutes here. And when a gentleman dies in England, in order to
+determine whether he shall be saved or not, it is necessary for the
+power of heaven to read the acts of Parliament. It becomes a
+question of law, and sometimes a man is damned on a very nice
+point. Lost on demurrer.</p>
+<p>A few years ago, a gentleman by the name of Seabury, Samuel
+Seabury, was sent over to England to get some apostolic succession.
+We had not a drop in the house. It was necessary for the bishops of
+the English Church to put their hands upon his head. They refused.
+There was no act of Parliament justifying it. He had then to go to
+the Scotch bishops; and, had the Scotch bishops refused, we never
+would have had any apostolic succession in the New World, and God
+would have been driven out of half the earth, and the true church
+never could have been founded upon this continent. But the Scotch
+bishops put their hands on his head, and now we have an unbroken
+succession of heads and hands from St. Paul to the last bishop.</p>
+<p>In this country the Episcopalians have done some good, and I
+want to thank that church. Having on an average less religion than
+the others&mdash;on an average you have done more good to mankind.
+You preserved some of the humanities. You did not hate music; you
+did not absolutely despise painting, and you did not altogether
+abhor architecture, and you finally admitted that it was no worse
+to keep time with your feet than with your hands. And some went so
+far as to say that people could play cards, and that God would
+overlook it, or would look the other way. For all these things
+accept my thanks.</p>
+<p>When I was a boy, the other churches looked upon dancing as
+probably the mysterious sin against the Holy Ghost; and they used
+to teach that when four boys got in a hay-mow, playing seven-up,
+that the eternal God stood whetting the sword of his eternal wrath
+waiting to strike them down to the lowest hell. That church has
+done some good.</p>
+<p>The Episcopal creed is substantially like the Catholic,
+containing a few additional absurdities. The Episcopalians teach
+that it is easier to get forgiveness for sin after you have been
+baptized. They seem to think that the moment you are baptized you
+become a member of the firm, and as such are entitled to wickedness
+at cost. This church is utterly unsuited to a free people. Its
+government is tyrannical, supercilious and absurd. Bishops talk as
+though they were responsible for the souls in their charge. They
+wear vests that button on one side. Nothing is so essential to the
+clergy of this denomination as a good voice. The Episcopalians have
+persecuted just to the extent of their power. Their treatment of
+the Irish has been a crime&mdash;a crime lasting for three hundred
+years. That church persecuted the Puritans of England and the
+Presbyterians of Scotland. In England the altar is the mistress of
+the throne, and this mistress has always looked at honest wives
+with scorn.</p>
+<a name="link0023"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>VIII. THE METHODISTS</h2>
+<p>ABOUT a hundred and fifty years ago, two men, John Wesley and
+George Whitfield, said, If everybody is going to hell, somebody
+ought to mention it. The Episcopal clergy said: Keep still; do not
+tear your gown. Wesley and Whitfield said: This frightful truth
+ought to be proclaimed from the housetop of every opportunity, from
+the highway of every occasion. They were good, honest men. They
+believed their doctrine. And they said: If there is a hell, and a
+Niagara of souls pouring over an eternal precipice of ignorance,
+somebody ought to say something. They were right; somebody ought,
+if such a thing is true. Wesley was a believer in the Bible. He
+believed in the actual presence of the Almighty.</p>
+<p>God used to do miracles for him; used to put off a rain several
+days to give his meeting a chance; used to cure his horse of
+lameness; used to cure Mr. Wesley's headaches.</p>
+<p>And Mr. Wesley also believed in the actual existence of the
+devil. He believed that devils had possession of people. He talked
+to the devil when he was in folks, and the devil told him that he
+was going to leave; and that he was going into another person. That
+he would be there at a certain time; and Wesley went to that other
+person, and there the devil was, prompt to the minute. He regarded
+every conversion as warfare between God and this devil for the
+possession of that human soul, and that in the warfare God had
+gained the victory. Honest, no doubt. Mr. Wesley did not believe in
+human liberty. Honest, no doubt. Was opposed to the liberty of the
+colonies. Honestly so. Mr. Wesley preached a sermon entitled: "The
+Cause and Cure of Earthquakes," in which he took the ground that
+earthquakes were caused by sin; and the only way to stop them was
+to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. No doubt an honest man.</p>
+<p>Wesley and Whitfield fell out on the question of predestination.
+Wesley insisted that God invited everybody to the feast. Whitfield
+said he did not invite those he knew would not come. Wesley said he
+did. Whitfield said: Well, he did not put plates for them, anyway.
+Wesley said he did. So that, when they were in hell he could show
+them that there was a seat left for them. The church that they
+founded is still active. And probably no church in the world has
+done so much preaching for as little money as the Methodists.
+Whitfield believed in slavery, and advocated the slave-trade. And
+it was of Whitfield that Whittier made the two lines:</p>
+<pre>
+ "He bade the slave ships speed from coast to coast,
+ Fanned by the wings of the Holy Ghost."
+</pre>
+<p>We have lately had a meeting of the Methodists, and I find by
+their statistics that they believe that they have converted 130,000
+folks in a year. That, in order to do this, they have 26,000
+preachers, 226,000 Sunday school scholars, and about $100,000,000
+invested in church property. I find, in looking over the history of
+the world, that there are 40,000,000 or 50,000,000 of people born a
+year, and if they are saved at the rate of 130,000 a year, about
+how long will it take that doctrine to save this world? Good,
+honest people; but they are mistaken.</p>
+<p>In old times they were very simple. Churches used to be like
+barns. They used to have them divided&mdash;men on that side, and
+women on this. A little barbarous. We have advanced since then, and
+we now find as a fact, demonstrated by experience, that a man
+sitting by the woman he loves can thank God as heartily as though
+sitting between two men that he has never been introduced to.</p>
+<p>There is another thing the Methodists should remember, and that
+is that the Episcopalians were the greatest enemies they ever had.
+And they should remember that the Freethinkers have always treated
+them kindly and well.</p>
+<p>There is one thing about the Methodist Church in the North that
+I like. But I find that it is not Methodism that does that. I find
+that the Methodist Church in the South is as much opposed to
+liberty as the Methodist Church North is in favor of liberty. So it
+is not Methodism that is in favor of liberty or slavery. They
+differ a little in their creed from the rest. They do not believe
+that God does everything. They believe that he does his part, and
+that you must do the rest, and that getting to heaven is a
+partnership business. The Methodist Church is adapted to new
+countries&mdash;its ministers are generally uncultured, and with
+them zeal takes the place of knowledge. They convert people with
+noise. In the silence that follows most of the converts
+backslide.</p>
+<p>In a little while a struggle will commence between the few who
+are growing and the orthodox many. The few will be driven out, and
+the church will be governed by those who believe without
+understanding.</p>
+<a name="link0024"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>IX. THE PRESBYTERIANS</h2>
+<p>THE next church is the Presbyterian, and in my judgment the
+worst of all, as far as creed is concerned. This church was founded
+by John Calvin, a murderer!</p>
+<p>John Calvin, having power in Geneva, inaugurated human torture.
+Voltaire abolished torture in France. The man who abolished
+torture, if the Christian religion be true, God is now torturing in
+hell, and the man who inaugurated torture, is now a glorified angel
+in heaven. It will not do.</p>
+<p>John Knox started this doctrine in Scotland, and there is this
+peculiarity about Presbyterianism&mdash;it grows best where the
+soil is poorest. I read the other day an account of a meeting
+between John Knox and John Calvin. Imagine a dialogue between a
+pestilence and a famine! Imagine a conversation between a block and
+an ax! As I read their conversation it seemed to me as though John
+Knox and John Calvin were made for each other; that they fitted
+each other like the upper and lower jaws of a wild beast. They
+believed happiness was a crime; they looked upon laughter as
+blasphemy; and they did all they could to destroy every human
+feeling, and to fill the mind with the infinite gloom of
+predestination and eternal death. They taught the doctrine that God
+had a right to damn us because he made us. That is just the reason
+that he has not a right to damn us. There is some dust. Unconscious
+dust! What right has God to change that unconscious dust into a
+human being, when he knows that human being will sin; when he knows
+that human being will suffer eternal agony? Why not leave him in
+the unconscious dust? What right has an infinite God to add to the
+sum of human agony? Suppose I knew that I could change that piece
+of furniture into a living, sentient human being, and I knew that
+that being would suffer untold agony forever. If I did it, I would
+be a fiend. I would leave that being in the unconscious dust.</p>
+<p>And yet we are told that we must believe such a doctrine or we
+are to be eternally damned! It will not do.</p>
+<p>In 1839 there was a division in this church, and they had a
+lawsuit to see which was the church of God. And they tried it by a
+judge and jury, and the jury decided that the new school was the
+church of God, and then they got a new trial, and the next jury
+decided that the old school was the church of God, and that settled
+it. That church teaches that infinite innocence was sacrificed for
+me! I do not want it! I do not wish to go to heaven unless I can
+settle by the books, and go there because I ought to go there. I
+have said, and I say again, I do not wish to be a charity angel. I
+have no ambition to become a winged pauper of the skies.</p>
+<p>The other day a young gentleman, a Presbyterian who had just
+been converted, came to me and he gave me a tract, and he told me
+he was perfectly happy. Said I, "Do you think a great many people
+are going to hell?" "Oh, yes." "And you are perfectly happy?" Well,
+he did not know as he was, quite. "Would not you be happier if they
+were all going to heaven?" "Oh, yes." "Well, then, you are not
+perfectly happy?" No, he did not think he was. "When you get to
+heaven, then you will be perfectly happy?" "Oh, yes." "Now, when we
+are only going to hell, you are not quite happy; but when we are in
+hell, and you in heaven, then you will be perfectly happy? You will
+not be as decent when you get to be an angel as you are now, will
+you?" "Well," he said, "that was not exactly it." Said I, "Suppose
+your mother were in hell, would you be happy in heaven then?"
+"Well," he says, "I suppose God would know the best place for
+mother." And I thought to myself, then, if I was a woman, I would
+like to have five or six boys like that.</p>
+<p>It will not do. Heaven is where those are we love, and those who
+love us. And I wish to go to no world unless I can be accompanied
+by those who love me here. Talk about the consolations of this
+infamous doctrine. The consolations of a doctrine that makes a
+father say, "I can be happy with my daughter in hell;" that makes a
+mother say, "I can be happy with my generous, brave boy in hell;"
+that makes a boy say, "I can enjoy the glory of heaven with the
+woman who bore me, the woman <i>who would have died for me</i>, in
+eternal agony." And they call that tidings of great joy.</p>
+<p>No church has done more to fill the world with gloom than the
+Presbyterian. Its creed is frightful, hideous, and hellish. The
+Presbyterian god is the monster of monsters. He is an eternal
+executioner, jailer and turnkey. He will enjoy forever the shrieks
+of the lost,&mdash;the wails of the damned. Hell is the festival of
+the Presbyterian god.</p>
+<a name="link0025"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>X. THE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE.</h2>
+<p>I HAVE not time to speak of the Baptists,&mdash;that Jeremy
+Taylor said were as much to be rooted out as anything that is the
+greatest pest and nuisance on the earth. He hated the Baptists
+because they represented, in some little degree, the liberty of
+thought. Nor have I time to speak of the Quakers, the best of all,
+and abused by all.</p>
+<p>I cannot forget that John Fox, in the year of grace 1640, was
+put in the pillory and whipped from town to town, scarred, put in a
+dungeon, beaten, trampled upon, and what for? Simply because he
+preached the doctrine: "Thou shalt not resist evil with evil."
+"Thou shalt love thy enemies."</p>
+<p>Think of what the church must have been that day to scar the
+flesh of that loving man! Just think of it! I say I have not time
+to speak of all these sects&mdash;the varieties of Presbyterians
+and Campbellites. There are hundreds and hundreds of these sects,
+all founded upon this creed that I read, differing simply in
+degree.</p>
+<p>Ah! but they say to me: You are fighting something that is dead.
+Nobody believes this now. The preachers do not believe what they
+preach in the pulpit. The people in the pews do not believe what
+they hear preached. And they say to me: You are fighting something
+that is dead. This is all a form, we do not believe a solitary
+creed in the world. We sign them and swear that we believe them,
+but we do not. And none of us do. And all the ministers, they say
+in private, admit that they do not believe it, not quite. I do not
+know whether this is so or not. I take it that they believe what
+they preach. I take it that when they meet and solemnly agree to a
+creed, they are honest and really believe in that creed. But let us
+see if I am waging a war against the ideas of the dead. Let us see
+if I am simply storming a cemetery.</p>
+<p>The Evangelical Alliance, made up of all orthodox denominations
+of the world, met only a few years ago, and here is their creed:
+They believe in the divine inspiration, authority and sufficiency
+of the holy Scriptures; the right and duty of private judgment in
+the interpretation of the holy Scriptures, but if you interpret
+wrong you are damned. They believe in the unity of the godhead and
+the Trinity of the persons therein. They believe in the utter
+depravity of human nature. There can be no more infamous doctrine
+than that. They look upon a little child as a lump of depravity. I
+look upon it as a bud of humanity, that will, in the air and light
+of love and joy, blossom into rich and glorious life.</p>
+<p>Total depravity of human nature! Here is a woman whose husband
+has been lost at sea; the news comes that he has been drowned by
+the ever-hungry waves, and she waits. There is something in her
+heart that tells her he is alive. And she waits. And years
+afterward as she looks down toward the little gate she sees him; he
+has been given back by the sea, and she rushes to his arms, and
+covers his face with kisses and with tears. And if that infamous
+doctrine is true every tear is a crime, and every kiss a blasphemy.
+It will not do. According to that doctrine, if a man steals and
+repents, and takes back the property, the repentance and the taking
+back of the property are two other crimes. It is an infamy. What
+else do they believe? "The justification of a sinner by faith
+alone," without works&mdash;just faith. Believing something that
+you do not understand. Of course God can not afford to reward a man
+for believing anything that is reasonable. God rewards only for
+believing something that is unreasonable. If you believe something
+that is improbable and unreasonable, you are a Christian; but if
+you believe something that you know is not so, then,&mdash;you are
+a saint.</p>
+<p>They believe in the eternal blessedness of the righteous, and in
+the eternal punishment of the wicked.</p>
+<p>Tidings of great joy! They are so good that they will not
+associate with Universalists. They will not associate with
+Unitarians; they will not associate with scientists; they will only
+associate with those who believe that God so loved the world that
+he made up his mind to damn the most of us.</p>
+<p>The Evangelical Alliance reiterates the absurdities of the Dark
+Ages&mdash;repeats the five points of Calvin&mdash;replenishes the
+fires of hell&mdash;certifies to the mistakes and miracles of the
+Bible&mdash;maligns the human race, and kneels to a god who
+accepted the agony of the innocent as an atonement for the
+guilty.</p>
+<a name="link0026"><!-- H2 anchor --></a>
+<div style="height: 4em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+<h2>XI. WHAT DO YOU PROPOSE?</h2>
+<p>THEN they say to me: "What do you propose? You have torn this
+down, what do you propose to give us in place of it?"</p>
+<p>I have not torn the good down. I have only endeavored to trample
+out the ignorant, cruel fires of hell. I do not tear away the
+passage: "God will be merciful to the merciful." I do not destroy
+the promise; "If you will forgive others, God will forgive you." I
+would not for anything blot out the faintest star that shines in
+the horizon of human despair, nor in the sky of human hope; but I
+will do what I can to get that infinite shadow out of the heart of
+man.</p>
+<p>"What do you propose in place of this?"</p>
+<p>Well, in the first place, I propose good fellowship&mdash;good
+friends all around. No matter what we believe, shake hands and let
+it go. That is your opinion; this is mine: let us be friends.
+Science makes friends; religion, superstition, makes enemies. They
+say: Belief is important. I say: No, actions are important. Judge
+by deed, not by creed. Good fellowship&mdash;good
+friends&mdash;sincere men and women&mdash;mutual forbearance, born
+of mutual respect. We have had too many of these solemn people.
+Whenever I see an exceedingly solemn man, I know he is an
+exceedingly stupid man. No man of any humor ever founded a
+religion&mdash;never. Humor sees both sides. While reason is the
+holy light, humor carries the lantern, and the man with a keen
+sense of humor is preserved from the solemn stupidities of
+superstition. I like a man who has got good feeling for everybody;
+good fellowship. One man said to another:</p>
+<p>"Will you take a glass of wine?"</p>
+<p>"I do not drink."</p>
+<p>"Will you smoke a cigar?"</p>
+<p>"I do not smoke."</p>
+<p>"Maybe you will chew something?"</p>
+<p>"I do not chew."</p>
+<p>"Let us eat some hay."</p>
+<p>"I tell you I do not eat hay."</p>
+<p>"Well, then, good-by, for you are no company for man or
+beast."</p>
+<p>I believe in the gospel of Cheerfulness, the gospel of Good
+Nature; the gospel of Good Health. Let us pay some attention to our
+bodies. Take care of our bodies, and our souls will take care of
+themselves. Good health! And I believe the time will come when the
+public thought will be so great and grand that it will be looked
+upon as infamous to perpetuate disease. I believe the time will
+come when man will not fill the future with consumption and
+insanity. I believe the time will come when we will study
+ourselves, and understand the laws of health and then we will say:
+We are under obligation to put the flags of health in the cheeks of
+our children. Even if I got to heaven, and had a harp, I would hate
+to look back upon my children and grandchildren, and see them
+diseased, deformed, crazed&mdash;all suffering the penalties of
+crimes I had committed.</p>
+<p>I believe in the gospel of Good Living. You can not make any god
+happy by fasting. Let us have good food, and let us have it well
+cooked&mdash;and it is a thousand times better to know how to cook
+than it is to understand any theology in the world.</p>
+<p>I believe in the gospel of good clothes; I believe in the gospel
+of good houses; in the gospel of water and soap. I believe in the
+gospel of intelligence; in the gospel of education. The
+school-house is my cathedral. The universe is my Bible. I believe
+in that gospel of justice, that we must reap what we sow.</p>
+<p>I do not believe in forgiveness as it is preached by the church.
+We do not need the forgiveness of God, but of each other and of
+ourselves. If I rob Mr. Smith and God forgives me, how does that
+help Smith? If I, by slander, cover some poor girl with the leprosy
+of some imputed crime, and she withers away like a blighted flower
+and afterward I get the forgiveness of God, how does that help her?
+If there is another world, we have got to settle with the people we
+have wronged in this. No bankrupt court there. Every cent must be
+paid.</p>
+<p>The Christians say, that among the ancient Jews, if you
+committed a crime you had to kill a sheep. Now they say "charge
+it." "Put it on the slate." It will not do. For every crime you
+commit you must answer to yourself and to the one you injure. And
+if you have ever clothed another with woe, as with a garment of
+pain, you will never be quite as happy as though you had not done
+that thing. No forgiveness by the gods. Eternal, inexorable,
+everlasting justice, so far as Nature is concerned. You must reap
+the result of your acts. Even when forgiven by the one you have
+injured, it is not as though the injury had not been done. That is
+what I believe in. And if it goes hard with me, I will stand it,
+and I will cling to my logic, and I will bear it like a man.</p>
+<p>And I believe, too, in the gospel of Liberty, in giving to
+others what we claim for ourselves. I believe there is room
+everywhere for thought, and the more liberty you give away, the
+more you will have. In liberty extravagance is economy. Let us be
+just. Let us be generous to each other.</p>
+<p>I believe in the gospel of Intelligence. That is the only lever
+capable of raising mankind. Intelligence must be the savior of this
+world. Humanity is the grand religion, and no God can put a man in
+hell in another world, who has made a little heaven in this. God
+cannot make a man miserable if that man has made somebody else
+happy. God cannot hate anybody who is capable of loving anybody.
+Humanity&mdash;that word embraces all there is.</p>
+<p>So I believe in this great gospel of Humanity.</p>
+<p>"Ah! but," they say, "it will not do. You must believe." I say,
+No. My gospel of health will bring life. My gospel of intelligence,
+my gospel of good living, my gospel of good-fellowship will cover
+the world with happy homes. My doctrine will put carpets upon your
+floors, pictures upon your walls. My doctrine will put books upon
+your shelves, ideas in your minds. My doctrine will rid the world
+of the abnormal monsters born of ignorance and superstition. My
+doctrine will give us health, wealth and happiness. That is what I
+want. That is what I believe in. Give us intelligence. In a little
+while a man will find that he can not steal without robbing
+himself. He will find that he cannot murder without assassinating
+his own joy. He will find that every crime is a mistake. He will
+find that only that man carries the cross who does wrong, and that
+upon the man who does right the cross turns to wings that will bear
+him upward forever. He will find that even intelligent self-love
+embraces within its mighty arms all the human race.</p>
+<p>"Oh," but they say to me, "you take away immortality." I do not.
+If we are immortal it is a fact in nature, and we are not indebted
+to priests for it, nor to bibles for it, and it cannot be destroyed
+by unbelief.</p>
+<p>As long as we love we will hope to live, and when the one dies
+that we love we will say: "Oh, that we could meet again," and
+whether we do or not it will not be the work of theology. It will
+be a fact in nature. I would not for my life destroy one star of
+human hope, but I want it so that when a poor woman rocks the
+cradle and sings a lullaby to the dimpled darling, she will not be
+compelled to believe that ninety-nine chances in a hundred she is
+raising kindling wood for hell.</p>
+<p>One world at a time is my doctrine.</p>
+<p>It is said in this Testament, "Sufficient unto the day is the
+evil thereof;" and I say: Sufficient unto each world is the evil
+thereof.</p>
+<p>And suppose after all that death does end all. Next to eternal
+joy, next to being forever with those we love and those who have
+loved us, next to that, is to be wrapt in the dreamless drapery of
+eternal peace. Next to eternal life is eternal sleep. Upon the
+shadowy shore of death the sea of trouble casts no wave. Eyes that
+have been curtained by the everlasting dark, will never know again
+the burning touch of tears. Lips touched by eternal silence will
+never speak again the broken words of grief. Hearts of dust do not
+break. The dead do not weep. Within the tomb no veiled and weeping
+sorrow sits, and in the ray-less gloom is crouched no shuddering
+fear.</p>
+<p>I had rather think of those I have loved, and lost, as having
+returned to earth, as having become a part of the elemental wealth
+of the world&mdash;I would rather think of them as unconscious
+dust, I would rather dream of them as gurgling in the streams,
+floating in the clouds, bursting in the foam of light upon the
+shores of worlds, I would rather think of them as the lost visions
+of a forgotten night, than to have even the faintest fear that
+their naked souls have been clutched by an orthodox god. I will
+leave my dead where nature leaves them. Whatever flower of hope
+springs up in my heart I will cherish, I will give it breath of
+sighs and rain of tears. But I can not believe that there is any
+being in this universe who has created a human soul for eternal
+pain. I would rather that every god would destroy himself; I would
+rather that we all should go to eternal chaos, to black and
+starless night, than that just one soul should suffer eternal
+agony.</p>
+<p>I have made up my mind that if there is a God, he will be
+merciful to the merciful.</p>
+<p>Upon that rock I stand.&mdash;</p>
+<p>That he will not torture the forgiving.&mdash;</p>
+<p>Upon that rock I stand.&mdash;</p>
+<p>That every man should be true to himself, and that there is no
+world, no star, in which honesty is a crime.</p>
+<p>Upon that rock I stand.</p>
+<p>The honest man, the good woman, the happy child, have nothing to
+fear, either in this world or the world to come.</p>
+<p>Upon that rock I stand.</p>
+<div style="height: 6em;"><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+
+<br />
+<table summary="" border="3" cellpadding="4">
+<tbody>
+<tr>
+<td><big><big><a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/files/38813/38813-h/38813-h.htm">
+TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR ALL 12 EBOOKS IN THIS SET</a></big></big></td>
+<td></td>
+</tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+<br />
+
+<br />
+<br />
+<br /></div>
+</body>
+</html>