diff options
Diffstat (limited to '38514-h/38514-h.htm')
| -rw-r--r-- | 38514-h/38514-h.htm | 9452 |
1 files changed, 9452 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/38514-h/38514-h.htm b/38514-h/38514-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b6b23f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/38514-h/38514-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,9452 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> +<head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> + <title>The Unpopular Review, Number 19, July-September 1918.</title> + <style type="text/css"> + /* Reset styles to avoid cross-browser problems */ + html, body, div, span, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p, blockquote, pre, a, abbr, acronym, cite, del, em, img, ins, strong, sub, sup, ol, ul, li, + table, caption, tbody, tfoot, thead, tr, th, td { margin: 0; padding: 0; border: 0; outline: 0; font-size: 100%; vertical-align: baseline; background: transparent; } + body { line-height: 1; } + ol, ul { list-style: none; } + ins { text-decoration: none; } + del { text-decoration: line-through; } + abbr, img { text-decoration: none; } + table { border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0; } + + + /* Overall document styles start here */ + html { margin:1em; font-family: Georgia, serif; } + body { margin-left:15%; margin-right:15%; } + p { text-align: justify; line-height: 1.3; text-indent: 1em; margin:0;} + h1, h2, h3 { text-align: center; font-weight: normal; clear: both;} + h2 {font-size:150%;} + h3 {font-size:125%} + blockquote {margin:1em 2em; font-size:.9em;} + sup {vertical-align:top;font-size:.7em;} + + ul { list-style-type: none; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -1em; } + li { margin-bottom: 0.5em; } + + /* Page number styling */ + .pagenum { position: absolute; left: 2%; font-size: 10px; font-weight:normal; font-variant:normal; font-style: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-indent: 0em; text-align: right; color: gray; } + .pagenum:after { content: attr(title); } /* Comment/uncomment this instruction to hide/show page numbers*/ + .disguise { color:window; } /* Used to make some page numbers invisible but still anchors. Used on pages that do not have page numbers printed on them but are included in the numbering scheme. */ + + /* Frontmatter */ + #frontmatter { margin:2em; border-top:2px gray solid;} + .f_p_1 { + font-size:3em; + width:100%; + border-bottom:thin gray solid; + text-indent:0; + text-align:center; + } + .f_p_2 { + font-family:sans-serif; + text-align:center; + font-size:.9em; + text-indent:0; + margin:.5em 0; + } + .f_p_3 { + text-align:center; + text-indent:0; + } + .f_s_1 { + font-size:2em; + } + .f_s_2 { + display:inline-block; + width:20%;} + .f_b_1{ + border-top:thin gray solid; + border-bottom:thin gray solid; + font-size:.8em; + } + .f_p_4 { + text-align:center; + text-indent:0; + text-decoration:underline; + } + + #contents { position:relative; margin:5em 0; } + #contents p { text-align:center;text-indent:0;margin:1em;} + #contents ul { margin:1.5em; list-style-type:none; } + #contents ul li ul { margin:0em;text-indent:0em;} + #contents .tocpage { position: absolute; right: 0; top: auto; text-align:right; } + #contents .toctitle { font-variant:small-caps;} + + + #masthead h1 { font-size:2em; padding:2em 0; border-bottom:thin gray solid;} + #mastdate { padding: 0 0 3em 0; border-bottom:1px gray solid;} + #mastdate p {text-indent:0em; float:left; width:33%; font-variant:small-caps; text-align:center; margin-top:1em;} + #leftmast, #centermast, #rightmast { } + + /* Articles */ + + .article { + padding-top: 3em; + } + + .article h2 { + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + } + + .article h3 { + margin-top:2em; + margin-bottom:1.25em; + } + + #correspondence h3, #casserole h3 { + font-style:italic; + } + + .first_paragraph, .continued_paragraph { + text-indent:0; + } + + .first_paragraph .first_word { + text-transform:uppercase; + } + + .first_paragraph:first-letter { + font-size:2.5em; + float:left; + margin: -.1em 4px -.1em 0px; + line-height: 1.1em;} + + .special_name, .first_word { + font-variant: small-caps; + } + + /* other structures inside the articles */ + + blockquote { + text-indent: 0em; + margin: 1.25em 7%; + font-size: 0.9em; + } + + hr.thoughtbreak { + display:none; + } + + hr.short { + width:25%; + } + + p.post_thoughtbreak { + margin-top:2em; + } + + .poem { + margin: .5em 10%; + text-align: left; + } + + .poem p { + margin: 0; + padding-left: 3em; + text-indent: -3em; + text-align: left; + } + + .poem p.i4 { + text-indent:2em; + } + + .epigram { + margin: 0em 10%; + font-size: 0.9em; + padding-bottom: 2em; + } + + .fnmarker { + margin-left: 0.2em; + font-size: 0.8em; + vertical-align: top; + } + + span.footnote { + position: absolute; + right: 2%; + left: 86%; + font-size: .8em; + text-align: left; + text-indent:0; + } + + .address_line, .closing { + text-indent:0; + margin-left:60%; + } + + .dateline, .signature { + margin-left:3em; + } + + /* backmatter */ + + #backmatter { + margin:5em 2em; + padding-bottom:2em; + border-bottom:thin gray solid; + } + + #backmatter p { + margin:0; + text-indent:0; + text-align:center; + } + + #backmatter p.a_p_1 { + font-style:italic; + font-weight:bold; + text-decoration:underline; + margin:1em 0; + } + + #backmatter p.a_p_2 { + margin-bottom:2em; + } + #backmatter p.a_p_3 { + font-size:3em; + } + #backmatter p.a_p_4 { + font-style:italic; + margin:1em 0; + } + #backmatter p.a_p_5 {} + #backmatter p.a_p_6 { + text-align:right; + font-style:italic; + margin:1em 0; + } + #backmatter p.a_p_7 { + text-align:justify; + text-indent:1em; + } + #backmatter p.a_p_8 { + text-align:justify; + text-indent:1em; + margin:1em 2em; + } + #backmatter p.a_p_9 {} + + #backmatter span.a_s_1 { + font-size:3em; + } + + #backmatter span.a_s_2 { + display:inline-block; + width:35%; + } + + /* no underlines in links */ + + a:link { + text-decoration: none; + } + + a:visited { + text-decoration: none; + } + + a:hover { + color: red; + background: inherit; + } + </style> +</head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Unpopular Review, Number 19, by Various + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Unpopular Review, Number 19 + July-December 1918 + +Author: Various + +Release Date: January 7, 2012 [EBook #38514] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE UNPOPULAR REVIEW, NUMBER 19 *** + + + + +Produced by Barbara Tozier, Bill Tozier and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + +</pre> + + <div id="frontmatter"> + <div id="front"><a class="pagenum disguise" id="pagei" title="i"> </a> + <p class="f_p_1">The Unpopular Review</p> + <p class="f_p_2">SOME THINGS IN WHICH WE ARE TRYING TO DO OUR BIT</p> + + <p>In disarming Germany—and, after that’s done, everybody + else, except an international police.</p> + + <p>In securing to all nationalities the right to choose their own + governments and affiliations.</p> + + <p>In making trade free.</p> + + <p>In securing the rights of both organized labor and the individual + workman, which involve on the one hand recognition + of the Trade Unions, and on the other, of the Open Shop.</p> + + <p>In cleaning up and bracing up literature and art.</p> + + <p>In modernizing and revivifying religion.</p> + + <p>Our humble efforts for these causes have so far been not only + gratuitous but costly. Therefore we feel justified in suggesting + to the reader who has not yet subscribed, the question + whether out of the sums which he devotes to those great + objects, a trifle might not be spent as hopefully as in any other + way, in backing us up by subscription or advertisement.</p> + + <div class="f_b_1"> + <p>75 cents a number, $2.50 a year. Bound volumes $2. each, two a year. + (Canadian $2.70, Foreign $2.85.) Cloth covers for volumes, 50 cents each. + No one but the publishers is authorized to collect money for the Review. + Persons subscribing through agents or dealers to whom they pay money, + do so at their own risk.</p> + + <p>For the present, subscribers remitting direct to the publishers can have + any back number or numbers additional to those subscribed for, except + No. 9, for an additional 50 cents each (plus 5 cents a number for postage + to Canada, 9 cents to Foreign countries), <em>provided the whole amount is paid + direct to the publishers at the time of the subscription</em>. Number 9 is out of + print, and can be furnished only with complete sets, which are sold at the + rate of 75 cents a number.</p> + + <p>Owing to the Post-office department spending many millions annually + in carrying periodicals below cost, it has become so loaded with them as to + be obliged to send them as freight. Therefore subscribers should not complain + to the publishers of non-receipt of matter under from one to two + weeks, according to distance. This subject is fully treated in No. 2 of + <span class="special_name">The Unpopular Review</span>, and in the Casserole of No. 3.</p> + + <p>☞ In order that the new writers may stand an equal chance with the old, + and the old not unduly depend upon their reputations, the names of writers + are not given until the number following the one in which their articles + appear.</p> + </div> + + <p class="f_p_3"><span class="f_s_1">HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY</span><br /> + 18 WEST 45th STREET <span class="f_s_2"> </span> NEW YORK CITY<br /> + LONDON: WILLIAMS & NORGATE</p> + + </div> + <div class="article" id="last_month_contents"><a class="pagenum disguise" id="pageii" title="ii"> </a> + <p class="f_p_4">CONTENTS OF THE PRECEDING NUMBER (18, for April-June, 1918)</p> + <ul> + <li>WHY AMERICA LAGS, Alvin S. Johnson, Professor in Stanford University.</li> + <li>ON GOING AFOOT, Charles S. Brooks.</li> + <li>THE PROBLEM OF ALSACE-LORRAINE, C. D. Hazen, Professor in Columbia University.</li> + <li>VISCOUNT MORLEY, Paul Elmer More, Advisory Editor of <cite>The Nation</cite>.</li> + <li>THE ADVENTURE OF THE TRAINING CAMP, George R. MacMinn, Professor in University of California.</li> + <li>HALF SOLES, Herbert Wilson Smith.</li> + <li>PRICE FIXING BY GOVERNMENT, David McGregor Means.</li> + <li>TURKEY UNDER GERMAN TUTELAGE, Rufus W. Lane.</li> + <li>MACHINE AND MAN, Grant Showerman, Professor in University of Wisconsin.</li> + <li>THE ATHLETIC HABIT OF MIND, Edward F. Hayward.</li> + <li>ARBITERS OF FATE, Virginia Clippinger.</li> + <li>FOOD CONSERVATION AND THE WOMAN, Mary Austin.</li> + <li>SOME REFLECTIONS ON REVOLUTION, T. Lothrop Stoddard.</li> + <li>THE JOB AND THE OUTSIDER, H. W. Boynton.</li> + <li>DURCHALTEN! Vernon L. Kellogg, Professor in Stanford University.</li> + <li>A NEW PSYCHIC SENSITIVE, The Editor.</li> + <li>CORRESPONDENCE: “The Obscurity of Philosophers”—Our Tax Troubles Again.</li> + <li>EN CASSEROLE: Concerning these Hasty War Marriages—Bergson and the Yellow Peril—A Problematic Personality—“Clause” and “Phrase.”</li> + </ul> + + </div> + <div class="article" id="contents"><a class="pagenum disguise" id="pageiii" title="iii"> </a> + <h2>CONTENTS</h2> + <p>FOR JULY-SEPTEMBER, 1918</p> + + <ul> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_1">Naturalization in the Spotlight of War</a> <a href="#page1" class="tocpage">1</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_2">War Prophets</a> <a href="#page19" class="tocpage">19</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_3">My Friend the Jay</a> <a href="#page33" class="tocpage">33</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_4">The Flemish Question</a> <a href="#page43" class="tocpage">43</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_5">Immortality in Literature</a> <a href="#page56" class="tocpage">56</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_6">Carlyle and Kultur</a> <a href="#page66" class="tocpage">66</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_7">The Freedom of the Seas</a> <a href="#page79" class="tocpage">79</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_8">The Conditions of Tolerance</a> <a href="#page94" class="tocpage">94</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_9">The Neo-Parnassians</a> <a href="#page106" class="tocpage">106</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_10">Humanism and Democracy</a> <a href="#page114" class="tocpage">114</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_11">The Modern Medicine Man</a> <a href="#page127" class="tocpage">127</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_12">“The Purest of Human Pleasures”</a> <a href="#page140" class="tocpage">140</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_13">War for Evolution’s Sake</a> <a href="#page146" class="tocpage">146</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_14">John Fiske</a> <a href="#page160" class="tocpage">160</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#article_15">Please Explain These Dreams</a> <a href="#page190" class="tocpage">190</a></li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#correspondence">Correspondence</a> <a class="tocpage" href="#page201">201</a> + <ul> + <li><a href="#correspondence_1">More Freedom from Hereditary Bias</a></li> + </ul> + </li> + <li><a class="toctitle" href="#casserole">En Casserole</a> <a class="tocpage" href="#page202">202</a> + <ul> + <li><a href="#casserole_1">If We are Late</a>—<a href="#casserole_2">The Kindly and Modest German</a>—<a href="#casserole_3">What the Cat Thinks of the Dog</a>—<a href="#casserole_4">A Hunting-Ground of Ignorance</a>—<a href="#casserole_5">Maximum Price-Fixing in Ancient Rome</a>—<a href="#casserole_6">Darwin on His Own Discoveries</a>—<a href="#casserole_7">Reflections of an Old-Maid Aunt</a>—<a href="#casserole_8">An Obscure Source of Education</a>—<a href="#casserole_9">Heart-to-Heart Advertising</a>—<a href="#casserole_10">The Curse of Fall Elections</a>—<a href="#casserole_11">Larrovitch</a>—<a href="#casserole_12">Our Index</a></li> + </ul> + </li> + </ul> + + </div> + </div> + <div id="masthead"><a class="pagenum" id="page1" title="1"> </a> + <h1>The Unpopular Review</h1> + <div id="mastdate"> + <p id="leftmast">No. 19</p> + <p id="centermast">JULY-SEPTEMBER</p> + <p id="rightmast">Vol. X</p> + </div> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_1"> + <h2>NATURALIZATION IN THE SPOTLIGHT OF WAR</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">Amid</span> the manifold uncertainties into which the war + has plunged us, one fact stands out with increased + definiteness—that in our midst, and even voting on our + policies, of life or death,—we have had for many years + large numbers of people who at best give only a divided + allegiance to this country, and at worst are devoted and + violent partisans of some foreign state. The evidence of + this truth has been of the most diversified character, + including the destruction of warehouses, docks, and munitions + factories, the burning of immense quantities of + food, the manufacture of ineffective torpedoes, the attempted + blowing up of war ships, and the dissemination + of disease germs among children, soldiers, and cattle. + The uniform object of all these activities has been the + decrease of the war efficiency of the United States. The + indications seem conclusive that the perpetrators have + been, not special German spies or agents sent over here + after our entry into the war or in anticipation of it, but + among the candidates for Mr. Gerard’s five thousand lampposts—persons + who have lived in our midst for long + periods, and have been accepted as belonging to us.</p> + + <p>So suddenly overwhelming has been the demonstration + since the war began, and particularly since the United + States entered the war, that there is great danger that + the impression will become established that the war + created the situation, that the danger is a war danger, + and that the problem will automatically solve itself when + the war is over. Nothing could be more prejudicial to a + <a class="pagenum" id="page2" title="2"> </a>correct understanding of the situation, and to a sound + solution of the national problems which will confront us + when the war is over. The war has not created the danger + from alien-hearted members of the body politic, it has + merely revealed it. The situation is the creation of our + traditional policy toward foreigners, and the menace + inherent in the situation existed, and was discerned by + many close students of political affairs, long before the + war was dreamed of. Although then the manifestations of + this danger were less spectacular, the danger itself was no + less persistent, pervasive, and insidious. When Carl + Petersen is triumphantly inducted into municipal office, + not because he is a Republican or a Democrat, not because + he stands thus and so on important public questions, + but because he is a Swede; when Patrick O’Donnell is + made detective sergeant, not because he has the highest + qualifications of all the men available, but because he + belongs to the same Irish lodge as the chief of police; + when Salvini, and Goldberg, and Trcka receive political + preferment or judicial favor because of the race from + which they spring or the nation from which they come, + the essence of the peril is exactly the same as when Hans + Ahlberg tries to sink an American merchantman because + its cargo of wheat is destined for England instead of + Germany.</p> + + <p>The peril in question is the peril of having in a democracy + large groups of voters actuated by racial and + national affiliations other than those of the country in + which they live: in other words, large elements of unassimilated + foreigners. The assertion of this danger does + not necessarily carry the implication of any inferiority, + mental, physical, or moral, on the part of the foreigners. + Difference without inferiority is dangerous, difference + coupled with inferiority is definitely injurious. There is + no need to reiterate the manifold evils which have already + developed, and which threaten to develop, from immigration + of the poor quality which our selective tests have + <a class="pagenum" id="page3" title="3"> </a>not sufficed to prevent. Undoubtedly the physical and + mental average of our people, possibly also the moral + average, has already been definitely reduced, and the + progress of the working classes toward a reasonably high + standard of living has been checked, but the point which + needs emphasis here is that difference in itself is dangerous. + The immigrant who is still a foreigner in sympathy and + character exerts a prejudicial influence upon the life of + the nation at every point of contact. It is impossible + for him to function as a normal unit in the social complex. + If by naturalization he acquires the right to participate + in political affairs, the opportunity for injury is multiplied. + He cannot possibly approach public questions as if his + allegiance were wholly with the country of his residence. + These facts are particularly illustrated with us by the + very large element known as “birds of passage.” The + only way these evils can be overcome is through genuine + assimilation.</p> + + <p>Assimilation is a spiritual metamorphosis. It manifests + itself in many changes of dress, of language, of manners, + and of conduct. But these outward semblances are not + assimilation. An alien is thoroughly assimilated into a + new society only when he becomes completely imbued + with its spiritual heritage. He must cease to think and + feel and imagine in ways determined by his old social + environment, and must respond to the stimuli of social + contact in all ways exactly as if from the very beginning + he had developed under the influence of his adopted + society. And this involves, of course, the entire abandonment + of any sympathy, affection, or loyalty different + from that which might be felt by any native of his new + home for the country of his origin or the people of that + country. Complete assimilation so defined may seem + impossible to the adult immigrant. This is almost universally + the truth. The spiritual impress of the environment + of one’s infancy, childhood, and youth, can + seldom be eradicated during the later years of life. Realizing + <a class="pagenum" id="page4" title="4"> </a>this, those who hate to admit that our immigrants are + not being assimilated, hasten to modify the definition. + But this does not help the case, because it does not alter + the situation.</p> + + <p>In this respect, the war has already rendered a distinct + service to this country. No longer can we blind ourselves + to the fact that national unity does not exist. Professor + William Graham Sumner used often to remark that the + United States had no just claim to the name of nation, + because of the presence of the negroes within its borders. + Whether that particular definition of “nation” is adopted + or not, there can be no doubt that real national homogeneity + is wholly lacking, and that the negro is by no means + the only discordant element. In fact, in many ways the + immigration problem is more imminent and menacing + than the negro problem: for the negro problem is in a + sense static, since it is not aggravated by continuous + accessions from without. We know what the negro problem + is, and can state it in terms which will be relatively + permanent. But the immigration problem presents constantly + changing aspects, not only because of its growing + numerical proportions, but because of the diversity of + its elements, and the uncertainty as to its future developments.</p> + + <p>One of the striking manifestations of this new recognition + of our dangerous situation is the change of front of + those who are opposed to the restriction of immigration. + The stock answer to the warnings of the restrictionists + used to be the assertion that assimilation was taking place + with perfectly satisfactory rapidity and completeness. + America was the great “melting-pot” of the nations, out + of which was to flow—was, in fact, actually flowing—a + new and better type of man, purged of all slag and dross. + As conclusive proofs of this claim, were advanced all + those superficial adaptations to new surroundings which + the immigrant and his children make with so much display + and gusto. The assimilating power of the American + <a class="pagenum" id="page5" title="5"> </a>People was asserted to be unlimited, and if there were + any hitches in the process, they could all be remedied by + distribution. How suddenly has this elaborate erection + of analogies, metaphors, and pseudo-arguments been + shown up for the flimsy camouflage that it really was! + Miss Grace Abbott, the avowed champion of the immigrant, + is forced to admit that “unity of religion, unity of + race, unity of ideals, do not exist in the United States. + We are many nationalities scattered across a continent.” + Miss Frances Kellor writes a book on <cite>Straight America</cite>, + in which she confesses the failure of assimilation in the + past, and turns to universal military service as a last resort. + Mrs. Mary Antin remains discreetly silent, and Mr. Isaac + A. Hourwich is less in the public eye than formerly.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">But even yet the opponents of restriction are not willing + to submit to the logic of the situation, and instead of + admitting the present need of true restriction, come + forward with a new substitute. This substitute goes by + the general name of “Americanization,” and is urged + upon us as the appropriate and adequate remedy for the + ills which none can longer deny. The essence of this + movement is that those who embody the true American + ideas and ideals—a group seldom named or definitely + described, but usually vaguely referred to as “we”—should + bend all their energies toward the assimilation + of our foreign population, and should seek by artificial + and purposive expedients to accomplish that cultural + transmutation for which the natural and unconscious + relationships of the immigrant have proved wholly inadequate. + And it must be freely granted that many of + the specific proposals of the “Americanizers” are intrinsically + meritorious and worthy of adoption. When it is + suggested that our foreign populations ought to be better + housed, fed, clothed, educated and amused, we all rise + in assent—provided he will do his share toward it; yet + in self-defence we must do more than ours. When we + <a class="pagenum" id="page6" title="6"> </a>are urged to assist the immigrant to learn the English + language and familiarize himself with the political history + and government of this nation, our common sense gives + ready response. The gross absurdity of the movement + lies in the assumption that any or all of these things, good + as they are, constitute assimilation, or will, in the natural + course of their accomplishment, produce assimilation. + Who will undertake to show that those persons of foreign + birth who, in the last three and a half years, have most + flagrantly violated their obligations to the country of + their adoption, are on the whole less well educated, less + familiar with the English language, less prosperous, or + even less versed in American institutions, than those who + have remained loyal at heart, or at least in conduct? By + all means let us have as small a proportion of our people + as possible who cannot read and write, who do not understand + the English language, who treat their women according + to the code of mediaeval semi-barbarism, and + who are content with living conditions something lower + than what we consider proper for domestic animals. But + let us not imagine that those who have freed themselves + from these anomalies are therefore true Americans.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">However, the crowning insult offered to the intelligence + of the American people by the Americanization + movement is the soberly uttered and persistently reiterated + proposition that the best way to cure the evils of a + heterogeneous population is to naturalize the foreigners! + In the voluminous literature issued by the group of organizations + directly connected with this movement, the three + injunctions to the foreigner which appear with the greatest + frequency and emphasis are: “Attend night school,” + “Learn the English language,” “Become an American + citizen.” As already stated, no fault can be found with + the first two admonitions in themselves. But the third + calls for close scrutiny, particularly as it involves a fundamental + question which is sure to rise to prominence when + <a class="pagenum" id="page7" title="7"> </a>the war is over. What benefits can be expected from our + hasty naturalization of aliens? What is the effect upon + the aliens and upon the country, of this urgent invitation + to become citizens? Ought it to be made easier or harder + to acquire citizenship?</p> + + <p>The first step in the answer to the foregoing questions + is the examination of the real meaning of naturalization, + and the process by which it is achieved in the United + States. Naturalization is the act of conferring citizenship + by a certain state upon a certain individual who hitherto + has been a citizen or subject of another state. Citizenship + implies rights and privileges, allegiance and obligations. + The only difference that may be looked for in an + individual after naturalization is that he now enjoys such + rights and privileges, and owes such duties and obligations + as appertain to State B instead of State A. The act of + naturalization is not a developmental experience or process, + but merely the registry of a change of status. Any + transformations in the character of the individual which + are regarded as essential to fitness for citizenship in State + B should have taken place before naturalization. The + act of naturalization will not produce them, nor is there + adequate ground for assuming that they will generally + follow that act. The only question which concerns the + naturalizing official is whether the candidate is already + affiliated at heart with the new country instead of the + old, and the tests imposed upon the candidate are theoretically + designed to determine or guarantee that affiliation. + If, therefore, the foreigner was in any degree dangerous + to his adopted country while an alien, there is no reason + to suppose that he will be materially less so as a naturalized + citizen. On the contrary, he is in a position to do + much greater harm, because of the new powers and opportunities + which naturalization confers, and because of the + new confidence and trust which he enjoys through his + citizenship.</p> + + <p>The harm thus done by naturalized but unassimilated + <a class="pagenum" id="page8" title="8"> </a>citizens may be malicious and intentional or incidental. + Many of the notorious election scandals of the past have + been made possible by large numbers of foreigners who, + having sought citizenship for narrowly selfish reasons, + have used it in unscrupulous ways. It is true that they + have frequently been abetted by native-born politicians; + but the foreigners furnished the material. The injury + done involuntarily, however, by well-intentioned voters + who simply are not Americans, is even more serious because + more extensive and more insidious. These are the + men who have taken the oath of allegiance in all sincerity, + supposing themselves to be as much in tune with the + spirit of American life as the occasion called for. They + have lived up to their lights as consistently, perhaps, as + the majority of native-born voters of the same class. But + their participation in public affairs has constantly been + colored by racial or national affiliations, by a foreign + outlook on life, and by incapacity to appreciate the true + genius of the American nation. Their influence has therefore + been to neutralize or thwart the efforts of conscientious + intelligent Americans to grapple with national + problems. An interesting case in point is the naturalized + German referred to in “A Family Letter” in the December + <cite>Atlantic Monthly</cite>, who refused to buy an inch of land + in this country, in order that he might be free at any time + to return to Germany. It has taken the emergency of a + war to reveal to many naturalized citizens how mistaken + they were (this at least is the most charitable interpretation) + when they supposed that the old allegiance had + been thoroughly subordinated.</p> + + <p>It is a most extraordinary inversion of logic, this mental + process by which people persuade themselves that rushing + our aliens through the naturalization courts will better + our national situation. The line of argument seems to + be something like this: A foreign resident of the United + States who desires to participate fully in the life of the + nation, and who is sincerely devoted to the best interests + <a class="pagenum" id="page9" title="9"> </a>of the country, will wish to become a citizen; therefore, + every naturalized citizen desires to participate fully in + the life of the nation and is sincerely devoted to its best + interests. Or perhaps a slightly less fantastic process of + cerebration might be this: Naturalization is conferred + upon foreigners who have fitted themselves to be received + into citizenship; therefore, to accelerate the process of + naturalization is to reduce the number of foreigners unfitted + for citizenship.</p> + + <p>If our naturalization laws were so strict, and the courts + which administer them so scrupulous, that no alien could + acquire citizenship except upon a convincing demonstration + of his assimilation, it would do less positive harm to + urge aliens to become citizens, because they would know, + or would in time learn, that to do so they must bring themselves + into complete harmony with the spirit of the nation. + It is therefore essential to examine the prescribed + qualifications for naturalization, and see exactly what + citizenship papers stand for.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">The requirements are simply stated. The candidate + must be a free white person, or a person of African nativity + or African descent. He must be twenty-one years of + age. He must have resided continuously five years in the + United States, and one year in the State in which he + makes application. He must have had his “first paper” + at least two years, but not more than seven years. He + must be of good moral character, must be attached to + the principles of the Constitution of the United States, + and must be able to speak English (unless registered + under the Homestead Laws) and to sign his name. He + must not be an anarchist or a polygamist. He must renounce + any hereditary title or order of nobility, and all + allegiance and fidelity to any foreign potentate, prince, + city, or state of which he is a subject. He must affirm + his intention to reside permanently in the United States, + and must declare on oath that he will “support and defend + <a class="pagenum" id="page10" title="10"> </a>the Constitution and laws of the United States + against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and bear true + faith and allegiance to the same.” He must have as + witnesses two citizens of the United States who testify + as to his residence in the United States, his moral character, + his attachment to the Constitution, and his general + fitness (in their opinion) to be admitted to citizenship.</p> + + <p>Now, assuming for the time being that the court officials + apply the law with the utmost possible rigor, what is + there in the foregoing list of requirements that guarantees + that the newly made citizen is free from any lingering + attachment to any other country, and ready to enter + single-heartedly into the life of the nation, ready to share + its burdens and the responsibility of grappling with its + problems, in a way at all comparable to the native-born + citizen?</p> + + <p>The qualifications in question fall into two groups: + first, those which are matters of demonstrable fact, and + second those which are mere asseverations of the candidate + himself, or of his witnesses. Most important in the + first category is the period of residence. With the aid of + the records of the immigration bureau this fact can be + definitely established. But what of it? What does a + residence of five years mean as to assimilation? Under + modern conditions almost nothing. This provision was + written into the law over a century ago, after heated debate, + and has never been changed, though in the middle + of the nineteenth century it was subjected to vigorous + attacks by powerful parties who wished the period raised + to twenty-one years. In a simpler organization of society, + there was some meaning in the five-year requirement. + When communities were small, when foreigners were few, + when the United States still preserved some of the character + of mediæval society, of which it has been said, “the + essence … was that, in every manor, every one knew + everything about his neighbor,” it was scarcely possible + for an alien to reside five years in the country without + <a class="pagenum" id="page11" title="11"> </a>becoming well known to a number of native citizens in + his community, and establishing many points of contact + with Americanizing influences. But in twentieth century + America conditions are completely reversed. It is not + only possible, but in innumerable cases the fact, that an + alien may live, not only five nor twenty-one, but forty + or fifty years in the midst of an American community + without experiencing more than the most infinitesimal + molding from a definitely American environment. In + fact, the majority of recent immigrants do not really + live in America at all, in anything more than a strictly + geographical sense, but in communities almost as foreign + as those from which they came. The mere physical fact + of five years residence of itself signifies absolutely nothing + as to the fitness of the alien to share in controlling the + destiny of the nation. Let us therefore examine the other + requirements in this group.</p> + + <p>The candidate must be twenty-one years of age. This + is reasonable and desirable, but tells us nothing of the + alien’s fitness for citizenship. The period of at least two + years intervening between the issue of the first and second + papers was presumably designed to give opportunity for + investigation of the candidate’s fitness, but rarely serves + that purpose now. There remain, then, three positive + requirements of fact—race, and ability to speak English + and to sign one’s name. The general question of the + greater desirability of one race over another, as material + for American citizenship, is too involved to be adequately + treated in this connection; clearly there is nothing here + to indicate the fitness of the individual. This leaves just + two tests of real assimilation, viz., ability to speak English + and to sign one’s name. These are assuredly among the + minimum requirements for citizenship, but they do not + go very far.</p> + + <p>Turning then to the qualifications which rest upon the + statements of the candidate and his witnesses, we find + that he must be of good moral character, and not a polygamist + <a class="pagenum" id="page12" title="12"> </a>nor an anarchist. Assuming that the truth is told, + these requisites are beyond objection, but what do they + tell us of the fitness of the alien for American citizenship? + To renounce hereditary titles is a proper enough requirement, + but one that throws no light upon the candidacy + of the majority of modern immigrants. The statement + of intention of permanent residence in this country is + meant as a guarantee of the good purposes of the alien + in becoming a citizen. But naturally this will be treated + most lightly by those who need it most, and it is a question + whether a foreigner whose motives are questionable + is any more desirable in the country than out of it. Anyway, + the destination of good intentions is proverbial. + Finally, then, the alien must renounce all foreign allegiance + and fidelity, and swear to his attachment to the principles + of the Constitution of this country, and engage to support + and defend it and the laws against all enemies.</p> + + <p>Remembering that, whatever may have been the efficacy + of the provision about witnesses in the early stages + of our history, it has degenerated into a sorry farce in + modern times, when professional witnesses hang about + the courts, ready to swear to anything for anybody, what + does the whole naturalization procedure, as stipulated + by law, amount to? Practically to nothing more than + the statement by the alien himself that he wishes to transfer + his allegiance from a foreign state to this, and the + swearing of fidelity. We virtually offer citizenship freely + to any alien who can meet certain arbitrary requirements + as to residence, race, etc., and is willing to take the oath + of allegiance. The one tangible thing is the oath, and the + unreliability of the oath as a guarantee of undivided allegiance + has been demonstrated over and over again in past + decades, and most emphatically by the traitorous behavior + of some of our naturalized citizens since 1914.</p> + + <p>In practice, officials may or may not add to the requirements + of the law a brief examination designed to + reveal the candidate’s knowledge of the workings of the + <a class="pagenum" id="page13" title="13"> </a>federal and state governments. But even at best, these + questions and their appropriate answers occupy only + half a dozen pages or so in a convenient little textbook, + which assures the alien that if he “thoroughly familiarizes + himself with the meaning of the questions and with the + answers thereto, he will be sufficiently qualified to be + admitted to citizenship,” even though the order in which + the questions are asked should be varied a little. To + cram up on this examination could hardly occupy an + intelligent high school boy a couple of hours.</p> + + <p>Since we thus offer citizenship almost for the asking to + any white or African alien who has resided here five + years, it follows that the issuance of naturalization papers + does not guarantee any degree of assimilation, and to urge + aliens to become naturalized is in no sense equivalent to + urging them to fit themselves for the responsibilities of + citizenship. There is accordingly absolutely nothing + to be said in defense of the notion that urging naturalization + upon our aliens will improve our domestic situation.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">But what of the opposite side of the case? Are there + any positive objections to the propaganda in question? + The answer involves an analysis of the probable effects + upon the alien of such vigorous encouragement, and the + probable effects upon the United States of a large increase + of naturalized citizens. The latter problem practically + resolves itself into the query whether an unassimilated + foreigner is less dangerous as citizen than as an alien. + This has already been answered. Because of the added + power, opportunity, and protection which the naturalized + citizen enjoys, and because of the greater demands he + may make upon the government, he is in a position to do + much more harm, maliciously or otherwise, as a citizen + than as an alien. It is true that federal naturalization + does not give him the right to vote. The suffrage is a + matter of states’ rights. Most states require federal + naturalization; some require additional qualifications, + <a class="pagenum" id="page14" title="14"> </a>such as literacy, while about fifteen allow even unnaturalized + aliens to vote.</p> + + <p>In the absence of guarantees to the contrary, it is + quite possible, not only that the alien may not be fitted + for citizenship, but that he may desire citizenship for + unworthy or ulterior purposes. Until stopped by a + recent law, it was a common practice for subjects of backward + or despotic foreign countries to come to the United + States, remain five years and take out their citizenship + papers, with no intention of even remaining longer, but + with the definite purpose of returning to their native + land and there carrying on their various businesses in + the enjoyment of the greater facilities and protection + given by the American flag.</p> + + <p>Another common motive is to qualify for a better + municipal or state job. Among the documents issued + by the Americanizing agencies is a poster, bordered in + red, white, and blue, and illustrated by a representation + of Uncle Sam, his right hand clasping that of a sturdy + immigrant, while his left points invitingly to the judge + who is issuing naturalization papers. After the customary + plea to become a citizen, the legend continues: “It means + a better opportunity and a better home in America. It + means a better job. It means a better chance for your + children. It means a better America.” (Why not add, + “It means a chance to turn a few honest dollars on election + day?”) If these statements were true, the case + would be bad enough, as, with the exception of the last, + they appeal to a decidedly low motive for seeking citizenship. + But they are not true. The newly made citizen + in time finds out that they are not true, and then he feels + cheated. When the better home and better job fail to + materialize, any budding sense of obligation to his new + country receives a sad shock.</p> + + <p>Urging citizenship upon the alien must inevitably + produce an attitude of mind exactly the opposite from + that which would make him a useful citizen. That which + <a class="pagenum" id="page15" title="15"> </a>comes easily is lightly regarded, and that which is presented + in such a way that the taking of it appears a favor, + is not looked upon with great reverence or respect. In + this respect much of the literature of the Americanization + movement is most pernicious. Moreover the emphasis + is all on the personal advantages of citizenship, not + at all on its duties or responsibilities.</p> + + <p>In this particular our forefathers were much wiser than + we. They recognized that American citizenship was a + thing of great value, to be regarded as a boon, procurable + only by earnest endeavor and true merit. They could + not have comprehended how the liberties for which the + Revolutionary heroes fought and bled could ever be so + degraded as to be hawked about the market place. We + would do well to follow their example. We esteem the + United States most highly of all nations. We believe + that it owes a peculiar debt to posterity, that those entrusted + with its career should be imbued with the most + profound respect for it, the deepest sense of their responsibility + to it, and the most thorough equipment for the + adequate performance of their duties with respect to it. + To participate in the control of the destiny of this great + democracy is an undertaking of the gravest sort; and + five years residence and the other requirements of the + naturalization law are no more a fit preparation for it + than five years of service in the office of a corporation + and familiarity with the office routine fit the office boy to + become a director.</p> + + <p>Any propaganda directed toward our aliens should + therefore take the form of urging, even to the point of + insistence, that they <em>fit themselves</em> for citizenship. This + will make them more useful and less troublesome residents, + whether they are eventually naturalized or not. But + citizenship itself should be held aloft, portrayed to them + as a priceless boon, to be won only as a reward of long + and patient effort, and a complete demonstration of their + fitness. If this results in discouraging some foreigners + <a class="pagenum" id="page16" title="16"> </a>from coming to this country, no harm will be done. If it + results in increasing the proportion of residents who do + not share in the government, and if this is in itself an + evil, the remedy is to be applied at the ports of entry, + and not in the naturalization courts.</p> + + <p>It is emphatically true that changes in our naturalization + procedure are needed. But they should be in the + direction of greater strictness, not of greater laxity. It is + not the purpose of this paper to discuss in detail what + these changes should be, but to emphasize the necessity + that in general the requirements should be more inclusive, + more positive, more significant of the assimilation + and fitness of the candidate, more determinative of his + good intentions in presenting his petition. One change + that is certainly called for is the modification of state + laws, by federal coercion if necessary, so as to make it + impossible for aliens to vote. As social organization + becomes more complex, the influence of government + upon the life of the individual becomes more extensive, + more intimate, and more vital; and as the sphere of government + expands, the responsibilities of the electorate become + heavier and more intricate. When peace is restored, + and the period of reconstruction commences, the demands + upon the intelligence, fidelity, and conscience of the voter + will be vastly greater than ever before in the world’s + history. It is essential to the maintenance of democracy + and the progress of humanity that the United States face + this critical period with the most efficient and harmonious + electorate possible.</p> + + <p>Does emphasis upon national homogeneity and solidarity + seem too reactionary in this crisis of the world’s history? + Does it appear that laying stress on the differentiation + of nationalities within our borders will prevent the + United States from playing its appropriate part in the + coming period of reconstruction, which, we are told, must + involve recognition of the principle of internationality? + A moment’s thought will make it clear that this position + <a class="pagenum" id="page17" title="17"> </a>is a mistaken one when the war is over. Nations will still + exist, nor will they pass out of existence with the progress + of any revolutionary international adjustments that may + be made. Whatever action is taken in the direction of a + world federation must be made by self-conscious units, + and must rest upon the basis of well-knit nations. The + recent unusually sound and suggestive piece of sociological + thinking, <cite>Community</cite>, by Mr. R. M. Maciver, + contains a most timely chapter on “Co-ordination of + Community.” In the course of his study of the way the + principle of association and common action is extended, + the author observes:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>Whether the ideal of nationality grows stronger or weaker + in the future, the fact of nationality … will always remain…. + Understanding the service and limits of nationality, we are + now in a position to consider how nations both are and can be + co-ordinated within the wider community which they build. + Such co-ordination can be directly achieved only through the + State, which is the primary association corresponding to the + nation…. It is true that the limits of nations and States are + still far from being coincident, but the great historical movements + have been leading towards that ideal. In any case it + must be the co-operation of States, whether they do or do not + coincide with nations, which will bring order into the still + existing chaos of the nations.</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>In the period following the war, the necessity will be + greater than ever before that the government of the + United States shall be able to deal with intricate and far + reaching problems with intelligence, unity, harmony, and + force. This can be done only through an electorate that + is intelligent, homogeneous, sympathetic, and free from + divisions into antagonistic or incongruous groups.</p> + + <p>An extreme but significant illustration of this principle + is furnished by the present situation in Russia. If a + general truce were declared tomorrow, and the nations + sought to get together to discuss a permanent basis of + settlement, one of the greatest obstacles in the way of + <a class="pagenum" id="page18" title="18"> </a>success would be Russia, simply for the reason that at + present there is no Russia in the sense that a nation must + exist to participate in such a council as that supposed. + There is no danger that the United States will fall into + any such state of disruption as Russia. But there is a + distinct danger that it may suffer from a lesser degree of + the same malady, the existence of discordant elements + in the body politic, and consequent inability to exert her + maximum force in attacking the problems of reconstruction.</p> + + <p>The period following the war will be a time for new + things. Easier than ever before will it be to shake off + the trammels of tradition and precedent, and inaugurate + approved though novel political policies. Foremost + among the matters which the United States will be called + upon to see to will be the reconsideration of our entire + attitude toward aliens, and their naturalization. The + time to prepare for that reconsideration is now.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_2"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page19" title="19"> </a>WAR PROPHETS</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">The</span> war is generating prophets as the Nile generated + frogs under the mandate of Moses, and there is a + similarity in the speech of both products. The prophets + are too cautious to risk their reputation in predicting the + events of the war; their forecasts relate to the sort of a + world we shall find ourselves in after peace returns. But + even this measure of prediction is a by-product of the + soothsayers who, whether their lips have been touched + with a coal from off the altar, or not, certainly wield the + pen of the ready writer. The main industry of the busy + prophets is to expound to us the meaning of the war, and + to disclose to us those causes of the war which we should + never have discovered for ourselves.</p> + + <p>The ordinary uninspired man feels when he has read + the diplomatic correspondence of a couple of weeks at the + end of July and the beginning of August, 1914, that he + knows fairly well what were the immediate causes of the + war, and where the responsibility lies. If he carries his + reading back as far as the annexation of Bosnia in 1908, + he is satisfied that he has a pretty comprehensive view of + the forces that precipitated the war. And if he has read + pretty abundant selections from the Pan-German literature + and the panegyrics on war—such a literature as no + branch of the human race, Christian or pagan, ever produced + before—he thinks he understands how it was possible + to plunge the German nation into this attack on the + world.</p> + + <p>But all this is merely a matter of reading and reflection. + Any one can reach such conclusions. The prophet must + reach some different conclusion in order to sustain his + claim to inspiration:</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>If this young man expresses himself in terms too deep for me,</p> + <p>Why, what a very singularly deep young man this deep young man must be.</p> + </div> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page20" title="20"> </a>The prophet has got to attribute the war to causes that + would not have occurred to the common mortal, and see + in it meanings that ordinary eyes cannot trace, or abdicate + his tripod.</p> + + <p>It is equally unreasonable and equally immoral to say + that the war proves that Christianity is a failure, and to + say that it proves Christianity has never been tried. Because + if either of these hypotheses be correct, one set of + belligerents is as deep in the mud as the other is in the mire, + and there is no personal culpability for this war, and no + national culpability either. We are all guilty of not being + Christians, or all unfortunate in having grown up in ignorance + of revelation, and beyond that there is no blame + for the war.</p> + + <p>If this war is not the result of certain perfectly well + known individuals using their own nations for an attack + on others, but is the result of impersonal enmity between + Teuton and Slav, then no person or persons are responsible + for the war, there is no more blame on one side than + there is on the other, and the moral element is as lacking + as it is in an encounter between the inhabitants of the + jungle. It is a curious thing that the prophet assumes the + role of a moral censor, and devotes much the greater part + of his energies to confusing the moral issues, to obliterating + moral distinctions, and to blunting the ethical sense.</p> + + <p>To condemn all war, which is a congenial theme for a + moralist, is rank immorality; for it puts the nation that + attacks, and the nation that repels the invader, in the same + category, and refuses to make any distinction between the + burglar, the householder who resists him, and the policeman + who overpowers him and drags him away to jail.</p> + + <p>The prophet readily drops his eye on armies, and at + once announces that it is their existence that accounts for + the war. If there were no armies there would possibly + be no wars, but we have shown more than once that armies + can be pretty rapidly extemporized. Besides, this, too, + confuses the moral issues. All nations have armies, and + <a class="pagenum" id="page21" title="21"> </a>if America and England had relatively small armies before + this war, they had the largest navy in the world and the + navy which ranked second or third. The highwayman + carries a pistol, and so does the paymaster who is obliged + to transport a treasure chest. If the possession of a revolver + was the cause of the homicide that occurred, the + guilt lies equally on the souls of both.</p> + + <p>We are told that no truth is more certain than that “if + you create a vast fighting machine it will sooner or later + compel you to fight, whether you want to fight or not”—which + is about as dubious a truth as was ever paraded as + an axiom—that “these vast machines, whether armies + or engines of war, are made to be used,” and that “the + military machine will overpower the minds which have + called it into being.” Then their responsibility is not for + the ensuing war, but for carelessness in leaving a war + weapon around. But if these vast military machines were + made to be used, then why complicate the question of + responsibility by representing the machine as overpowering + its careless but really peaceful creator, and compelling + him to fight whether he wants to fight or not?</p> + + <p>If the Kaiser and the Crown Prince and the General + Staff and the military caste and the Pan-German element + created the army to use against other nations, in accordance + with Bernhardi’s alternative of “world domination + or decline,” and if all the professors and preachers and + pamphleteers had taught the people that war was a high, + holy, and beautiful thing, and—more particularly—that + Germany could beat any other nation in a few weeks, + and the armies would return loaded down with spoils and + indemnities and title deeds to new provinces, and that + “our good old German God” had specially deputized the + German nation to overpower all the rest of the world, + make German the universal tongue, and the primitive + moral code of Germany the ethical law of the world, then + we know precisely who is guilty of this war. But if the + German army compelled the German Government to back + <a class="pagenum" id="page22" title="22"> </a>Austria in an attack on Servia, and on its own account to + invade Russia, Belgium and France, we are very much + at sea about the place where the moral burden is to be + laid.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">The prophet is particularly prone to find the causes of + the war in a material civilization, in our existing industrial + system, and especially in greed. The prophet and the + political orator are equally stern in their denunciation of + greed. At a time when prophets were so accustomed to + physical exercise that they could run ahead of Ahab’s + chariot, and in the absence of normal sources of supply, + were fed by the ravens, their indignation at greed, their contempt + for commerce, and their superiority to a material + civilization, was free from incongruity. The modern + prophet does not live on locusts and wild honey, nor is his + wardrobe limited to a belt of camel’s hair. His uncompromising + denunciation of his age is somewhat impaired + by the obvious fact that he has “some of the pork.”</p> + + <p>The deliverances of the prophet on this class of themes + are rather tiresome in their iteration, and distinctly irritating + in their oblivion to history. There is no civilization + that does not rest upon the possession and acquisition + of property; there is no clime or time in which men have + not worked for their living, and sought the means of + buying the things which their tastes, coarse or refined, + craved, in which there have not been rich and poor, and + in which it has not been much pleasanter to be the former + than the latter. The earliest social satirist, like the latest, + berated the accursed greed for gold, and castigated his + contemporaries for their love of luxury and their eager + pursuit of money. It would seem as if the prophet might + recognize that it is a very old sermon he is preaching, and + familiarize himself with the extraordinary age of those + evils of his own day which he feels it his mission to chastise.</p> + + <p>What distinguishes this age from others, and our own + country from others is that here and now wealth is acquired + <a class="pagenum" id="page23" title="23"> </a>more easily and more rapidly than at other times + and places. This being the very obvious fact, it shakes + our confidence in the whole fraternity of prophets that + they should, one and all, attribute the larger fortunes + made here and now to the greater love of money, or its + more assiduous pursuit. The rich man is more successful + in amassing wealth than the poor man, but he is not more + mercenary. Two men try equally hard to get rich; one + succeeds, and the other fails; the man who failed is quite + likely to be more eager for money than the man who + succeeded.</p> + + <p>The industrial system never meets the approval of the + prophet. An occasional prediction is that the war will + destroy our deplorable economic life, in which every man + is trying to get as high wages or as large a salary or as + ample profits as possible, and will usher in the golden + age, in which such base considerations as pecuniary compensation + will have a very secondary place in every man’s + mind. Before this war came, the most eminent educator + in America assured the workingman that he ought to + work for the pleasure of it, and not for the contents of + his Saturday night envelope. Such admonitions have + occurred, in one form or another, in the literature of the + sages, for centuries and millenniums. But it was never + evolved by a man who was digging postholes, and a noble + ambition to mine the very best coal cannot carry a miner + far when he is obliged to cut such coal as there is in front + of him.</p> + + <p>It is barely possible that by devoting some weeks to the + task, a man could produce a pair of shoes notably superior + to the ordinary run of shoes, and his professional pride as + a devout follower of St. Crispin might take keen delight + in the work of his hands; in the fact that he had made the + very finest pair of shoes in the world. But, after all, he + needs food, and possibly he is obliged to pay rent, and he + ought to have a wife to make comfortable, and children + to send to school in presentable form: so something besides + <a class="pagenum" id="page24" title="24"> </a>pride in his work is necessary. If he is to be adequately + compensated for his labor on that pair of shoes, + their price will be such that only the rich—if the rich + are to be permitted to survive—can buy them; and if + such shoemakers prevail, the greater part of mankind will + go barefoot. For does not the prophet who has poured out + the phials of his wrath upon an economic system that + makes quantity and cheapness, instead of real excellence, + its ideals, recognize that the purpose of quantity is to + supply the wants of a greater number of human beings, + and the purpose of cheapness is to enable human beings + to supply more of their needs? For certainly if the shoes + which are the very best shoes in the whole world, and + whose excellence affords the keenest satisfaction to the soul + of the shoemaker, cost $50, then it is quite certain that + the customer who carries them home will go without + many other things that he ought to have. If the shoes are + made by machinery and sold for $3, they may not be quite + so beautiful or durable as the artistic product of hand + labor, regardless of time, and yet be in the interest of the + customer and the community.</p> + + <p>After the prophet has got through with his ravings at + the present industrial system, the fact will remain that + there are a good many millions of us on this earth, and + that we have got to earn our livings, and that the agriculture + and industries of the Middle Ages would not keep all + of us alive. In addition to which, we may also venture + to suggest that the people of the Middle Ages were not + quite as honest as we are, and were not less particular + about getting a financial return for their exertions. The + modern industrial system was not created by capital for + capitalists; it is the result of the efforts of the community + as a whole to supply the needs of all of its members, and + to afford employment to all of them. Hunting and fishing + are pleasanter than most of the industries, but 100,000,000 + of civilized people are living and are equipped with intellectual + and moral accessories, where a quarter of a + <a class="pagenum" id="page25" title="25"> </a>million Indians once roamed. And although they toiled + not (systematically), neither did they spin (much), they + were not happier or better than we are.</p> + + <p>One prophet of more discrimination than most of his + clan admits that the industry and thrift which produce + capital are valuable qualities morally, but he is still confident + that the great wealth of the modern world is thoroughly + demoralizing. Whence it appears that the safe + course for the world to pursue is to work hard and save + carefully and burn up its accumulations every year in + order to keep itself poor but pious, like the parents of the + subjects of a style of religious biography now quite out of + date. Of course this prophet would prefer the wiser course + of not earning enough to afford wealth to accumulate. If + we would only adopt his system and work for the pleasure + of working, and for the satisfaction of producing absolutely + perfect products of our own skill, there would be no danger + of our sinking our souls into perdition with a load of gold. + Noah and his sons appear to have built the Ark by the + processes of domestic industry, in distinction from the + accursed factory or capitalist system. How their support + was provided for during the 120 years has not been recorded, + but if one man undertook to build a locomotive, + instead of merely making repetitions of a single part, it + would be necessary to make arrangement for this. And + when we are trying to replace the vessels destroyed by + German submarines, it seems necessary to use more rapid + methods of construction than sufficed before the Deluge.</p> + + <p>Will some prophet please tell us how poor we must be + in order to be virtuous and pacific, and how virtuous and + pacific the world was before it became prosperous? Were + there no wars before the Twentieth Century? The extent + of this war is scarcely a result of the world’s opulence, + when Sir Edward, now Viscount, Grey, offered to keep + England out of it if Germany would limit the war to the + Balkans or to Russia. The war has involved most of the + world because Germany began it by attacking France and + <a class="pagenum" id="page26" title="26"> </a>Belgium, and followed that up by attacking Americans + on the high seas, where they had as much right to be as at + home.</p> + + <p>This argument that the war is the result of wealth is + immoral, because it makes the guilt of America and England + even greater than that of Germany (for they are + richer); and because it is the argument of the communist—that + theft is not wrong, because it is the inevitable + consequence of private property: if no one has any right + to anything, then no one will steal anything.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Nothing holds the attention of the prophet better than + the idea that the war is the result of commercial competition. + This also is an invention of the devil to exculpate + Germany. All of us are in business for gain; we are actuated + by greed; we are making cotton cloth to cover + Africans for the profit that we can get out of it; we ought + to think only of clothing the naked, and if we would only + give the cotton cloth to the Hottentots without material + return, we should have the proud satisfaction of seeing + them draped in chintzes, and we should be safe from that + wealth which is so certain to make us wicked. On those + terms there would be very little competition in supplying + the Hottentots, and no danger whatever that any nation + would fight us to gain that portion of the export + trade.</p> + + <p>But the “peaceful penetration” of all other countries + by German industry and commerce had been going on + for thirty years before the war. England had stamped + “Made in Germany” upon the imports from that country + under the delusion that people would not buy them if they + knew they were not made by domestic industry, but the + only result was to advertise German business. Shipping + interests at Antwerp, factories in France, hotels in Switzerland, + iron works in Italy, commercial establishments in + China and South America, the trade and transportation of + Turkey, passed into German hands, and no nation offered + <a class="pagenum" id="page27" title="27"> </a>armed resistance. No less a witness than Prince von + Buelow testifies that England could easily have stopped + German naval expansion, but did not do so. German + commercial expansion did not cause the war, unless Great + Britain, the principal sufferer from German business success, + attacked Germany in 1914. And this is the German + official explanation of the war supplied for domestic consumption. + And yet it is repudiated by the highest + witness who could be put upon the stand. No less + a person than Prince Lichnowsky, who was German + Ambassador in London at the outbreak of the war, + traces the war to Austrian projects in the Balkans, with + the “blank check” of Germany, together with irritation + in Russia caused by Germany’s own efforts to establish a + dominating influence in Constantinople. This leaves + nothing of the story invented for the German people, and + propagated by the university professors, that England + attacked Germany because the latter was getting its trade + away from it. And this falsehood, invented to shield the + guilty nation, has a special fascination for the prophets. + It looks so much like taking a broad and general and impartial + view of the world. Satan is very liberal; it pains + him to have guilt attached to any individual. It is more + in accord with his philosophic and humane ideas to regard + crime as a product of social conditions, and war as the + result of trade competition.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">But the guilt of Germany is betrayed by the selection + by Germans of Sir Edward Grey as the especial subject + of hatred among all the hated British race. Nothing but + the consciousness of guilt can explain the extraordinary + vituperation of the British Minister who did in 1914 precisely + what he was highly praised for doing in 1913 in a + speech in the Reichstag by Chancellor von Bethmann-Hollweg. + That was the speech calling on the Reichstag + for an increase of about 136,000 men in the German army, + an addition of $50,000,000 a year to the military budget, + <a class="pagenum" id="page28" title="28"> </a>and a non-recurring capital tax for military purposes of + $250,000,000. The difference between 1913 and 1914 was + not in anything that Sir Edward did, but in the fact that + before the army increase of 1913 Germany was not prepared + for war and supported Sir Edward’s efforts for peace. + After that increase Germany was prepared for war, and + would do nothing to support Sir Edward’s efforts to avert + war, and the coarse abuse of Sir Edward is a “smoke box” + designed to conceal the changed position of Germany.</p> + + <p>Dr. von Jagow, Foreign Minister from 1913 to 1916, has + been put forward to reply to Prince Lichnowsky, but + agrees with the Prince that England did not desire war, + and that Sir Edward Grey, who is described by a German + divine as having “a cancerous tumor in place of a heart,” + acted in good faith in his efforts to find a peaceful solution + for the difficulty. One American writer finds the origin + of the war in the rival interests of Germany and England + in the Bagdad Railway, but Dr. Paul Rohrbach, now or + recently of the German Colonial Office, has admitted that + just before the war opened the interests of the two nations + were settled by a treaty, in which England made surprisingly + large concessions. This is also stated by Prince + Lichnowsky. So that the testimony of three particularly + eminent Germans destroys the fiction that England + attacked Germany because it was jealous of German + commercial expansion.</p> + + <p>The fundamental trouble with the whole race of war + prophets is that they think the war is a new thing, and + they feel called upon to tell the rest of us what to make of + it. War is about the oldest human industry. This is the + greatest of all wars, but that does not alter the meaning + of war. Nor does it necessarily alter the results of war. + While it is the greatest of all wars, it is not yet a long war, + and in proportion to the population it is not certain that + it is greater than other wars. It is not even certain that + in proportion to the men involved, it is more bloody than + other wars. We have no means of getting at the figures + <a class="pagenum" id="page29" title="29"> </a>except in the loosest way, because the several Governments + do not tell how many men they have at any given time or + place, or the casualties in any individual engagements. + But some approximations have been made, and they do + not indicate that the great war is decidedly more bloody, + in proportion to the armies, than other wars have been. + Our Civil War lasted full four years; the War of Independence + occupied seven. Before that was the seven years of + the French and Indian war, and one war is known as the + Thirty Years War. From the beginning of the French + Revolution to Waterloo was more than quarter of a century, + and at the end of that period another Bourbon was + on the throne of France. Our Civil War made nearly, if + not quite, as heavy a draft upon the population as the + present war has made upon the population of England or + France.</p> + + <p>The moral and religious questions involved in war are + not notably different in the greatest of all wars and in + wars which are not quite so great. Most of them are involved + in the ordinary administration of the criminal law + by which an orderly community protects itself from its + predatory members. Doubtless there will be social and + political results from this war, but if other wars have not + created a new heaven and a new earth, why should this + one? The prediction that this war will produce great + changes in the direction of democracy and of applied + religion are probably well founded. But the war will act + only as an accelerator. These changes have been going on + for a long time; the movements for fifteen or twenty years + before the war opened were very evident. Woman suffrage + and prohibition seem impending, but they are not + the products of this war: they had made great progress + between 1900 and 1914.</p> + + <p>None of the prophets betray any knowledge of history, + or see things in any perspective. The great war is the first + great cataclysm that they seem to be aware of, and they + are rushing to and fro, like the Chaldeans, to find explanations + <a class="pagenum" id="page30" title="30"> </a>of it, and to impress the public by their ability to + forecast its consequences.</p> + + <p>But when peace comes it will leave us face to face with + greed and materialism, and an industrial system in which + some men prosper and others do not, and an obligation to + labor from which no important fraction of mankind can + escape, and wants will multiply as fast as the means of + satisfying them increase, and for the greater part of us + the weekly pay envelope and the possibilities of a competence, + and the demand from the other side of the world + for the grain we produce, will continue to be our principal + incentives to work.</p> + + <p>Progress, intellectual and moral as well as material, has + been made in the past, but the world has not taken great + leaps ahead as the result of great wars, and still less has + it changed the direction of its movement as the result of + wars. The one thing of which the vastness of this war + gives us a fairly good assurance, is that no nation will + again be trained from infancy to old age to regard war as a + high, holy and beautiful process of attaining its manifest + destiny to rule the rest of mankind. For generations no + statesman will purpose a war, and no monarch will again + have the power of hurling his people at neighboring nations. + If Germany fails in its present effort, neither Germany + nor any other nation will repeat the experiment of + 1914.</p> + + <p>But the prophets will have no chance to point with + pride to the great religious, moral and economic revolutions + whose advent they pointed out amid the clash of + arms. We have found our soul, the prophets love to tell + us. They disagree on some things, and those who have no + revelation upbraid the others for not giving us a spiritual + interpretation and getting a vision of the future from the + carnage of the war, as the augurs pretended to see the + future when they were only looking at the viscera of their + victims. But all of them agree that we have found our + soul. When did we lose our soul? When Mr. Roosevelt + <a class="pagenum" id="page31" title="31"> </a>was President he was very apprehensive that we had lost + our “fighting edge.” Is any one worried now about our + lack of a “fighting edge?” Possibly our soul was never + lost. We betrayed some evidences of possessing a soul + very early in the war.</p> + + <p>The charge that we had lost our soul, or, at least, had + mislaid it, rests on two facts. One is that we are prosperous. + That fatal alliteration of poverty and piety has a + fearful hold upon the soul of the prophet. The other is + that we did not go to the rescue of Belgium when it was + invaded. But Mr. Roosevelt himself did not realize + that we ought to have gone to the rescue of Belgium, till + March, 1916. He is on record in September, 1914, as + satisfied with the course of the Administration, and convinced + that we should not have entered the war when our + own interests were not touched. And it ought to be forgiven + a statesman, if he is very reluctant to plunge his + country into war, and declines to put his Government in + the position of a knight errant, wandering around the + world in search of maidens to be delivered from donjons. + And furthermore, as the Monroe Doctrine is the corner + stone of our foreign policy, we were properly slow about + intruding into a European quarrel, until it became unmistakable + that it was much more than a European + quarrel—that it was an attack upon civilization and + popular Government. We were also justified in assuming + that Great Britain, France and Russia, three of the five + guarantors of Belgian neutrality, were capable of punishing + the two guarantors who violated their pledge, + several times renewed by Germany, even up to the day + before Germany invaded the country it had pledged its + honor to protect.</p> + + <p>But our soul, whether it was lost or not, is now in our + possession. Let us be thankful that the prophets recognize + that encouraging fact. And if our mind is also in our + possession, we may look forward to a world not entirely + different from the one we have known, but unquestionably + <a class="pagenum" id="page32" title="32"> </a>less likely to play with firearms, and quite certainly one + in which the common people will have much greater control + of their political destinies, and one in which no War + Lord, with chatter about shining swords and shining + armor and mailed fists, will be able to hurl his nation + against the others in a desperate effort to establish for + himself an overlordship of the world. Nor will any nation + ever be likely to rhapsodize over carnage, and feed its + sordid soul with thoughts of the territories and indemnities + to be got by war, or intoxicate itself with the delusion + that it is a race of supermen charged by the Almighty + with the duty of forcing its harsh language and its brutal + habits upon all other nations.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_3"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page33" title="33"> </a>MY FRIEND THE JAY</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">Every</span> man who comes into the world has need of + friends.” What Ursa Major thus profoundly observes + of mankind, from China to Peru, might be applied + with special force to the blue jay, at least to those jays + that come into the world. Of the rest “deponent saith + not.” For by common consent the blue jay is a rascal, nay + even a villain; and to deepen his turpitude to an infinity + of wickedness, I have heard one uncherished female with + a disposition slightly acid liken him to a Man. Indeed, + were some of his detractors to be believed, there is scarcely + a crime in the whole avian calendar that has not been + meditated upon and hatched in his nest.</p> + + <p>It is true that there are people of such impinging personality + that merely mild dislike with respect to them + seems impossible. The reactions they produce are violent. + Their admirers, when they have any, pursue their loyalty + to an <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">O Altitudo!</em> their enemies (and such are usually + legion) make of their names a hissing, and spit them out + of the mouth. To particularize, I might refer to a gentleman + who was vigorously active in the political unpleasantness + of 1912. His friends saw in him a Godefroy, come to + lead the politically pure against the hordes of the standpat + infidels; his enemies, when they had wiped the froth from + their lips, turned the vocabulary of prayer to evil uses, + and accused him of being in league with the devil.</p> + + <p>But these are merely individuals. The cases in which + an indictment is drawn up against a whole people are + comparatively rare,—the Goths, perhaps, the Turks, and + the bloodthirsty Belgians, to bring it down to modern + times, will serve as examples. Just such an inclusive indictment + is brought against the jay. “I fear,” says one + amiable and authoritative writer on bird life, “that the + blue jay is a reprobate”; and in this opinion most authorities + <a class="pagenum" id="page34" title="34"> </a>concur. Are there not, then, three righteous jays in + all Israel? No, say his judges. Peradventure one? “Only + in the museums of natural history,” they inexorably + answer. All living jays are impudent, profane, mischievous, + cannibalistic, “the hul cussed tribe of ’em,” as one + exasperated gardener wrathfully declared to me.</p> + + <p>Dear, dear! This is a terrible situation. Like Fuzzy + Wuzzy, the poor blue jay “‘asn’t got no papers of his own.” + Nor can he follow the example of those benevolent corporations + whose judicious investments in advertising + space temper the unshorn lamb to receive the shears in a + docile mood, and at the same time protect them from too + close scrutiny by the newspapers. He must bear the slings + and air-guns of outrageous boyhood with scarcely a voice + raised in his behalf. It seems hardly fair.</p> + + <p>It is true that the jay is not delicate in his appetite. + He cannot, like the ethereal maiden whom Burton mentions, + subsist for months on the smell of a rose. I knew + one old gentleman, to be sure, who secured a brief respite + from care, and achieved a state of mild hilarity, by applying + his nose to the mouth of a whiskey jug. But the jay + enjoys not these olfactive refections. He needs more substantial + food. He is omnivorous; and out of that important + characteristic springs his most reprehensible trait: he eats + little birds.</p> + + <p>One morning last summer I got up rather earlier than + usual to transplant some asters before the sun should + come out hot. It was a calm, breezeless morning, with + scarcely a sound to disturb the cool quietude, except the + song of a robin on the top of the old maple. Heaven be + praised! we have no trolley cars in our village, and no + factories. Suddenly there broke out in the alley, the wildest + commotion imaginable. It sounded as though the + sparrows from five counties were there, and had eaten of + the insane root. The air was filled with shrill cries, chirps, + and excited chatterings. I rushed to the fence, my fingers + all mud, and looked over. In the midst of a flock of sparrows + <a class="pagenum" id="page35" title="35"> </a>forty or more in number, all hopping about distractedly + but none daring to attack him, stood a big blue jay with + his crest militantly erect. From time to time he pecked + at something, but what that something was, like Peterkin, + I could not well make out. At every stroke of his strong + black beak the cries of the sparrows shrilled louder; whenever + he paused and looked around in his truculent contempt, + their frenzied crescendos somewhat abated.</p> + + <p>Curious, I drew nearer and discovered that the object + of his unpleasant attention was a young sparrow, a mere + fledgeling, scarcely old enough to be out of the nest. He + was murderously pecking it in the eye. The wee helpless + thing fluttered weakly in its agony and cheeped piteously. + I grabbed up an empty fruit jar that had protected a rose + cutting from the blasts of winter, and hurled it at the jay. + He flew screaming to a sour cherry tree a short distance + away, from which safe vantage point he cursed me with + every oath and revilement in his scandalous vocabulary. + The little sparrow I put out of its misery.</p> + + <p>As I went back to my asters, I could not help reflecting + on the scene I had witnessed. I seemed to see in it a small + counterpart of what had happened in Europe. Here was + little Servia in the person of this young sparrow—something + of a nuisance, perhaps, yet comparatively defenseless. + And here in the arrogant, domineering jay, relentless + and powerful, was Austria. A similitude might likewise be + made out for Belgium and Germany. And where, I + wondered, did my own country come in? With almost + sinister significance a sleek bronze grackle, plump and + round, his eyes standing out with fatness, emerged leisurely + from among the currant bushes and gobbled up a worm. + I had been vaguely aware of his presence from the first, + and now as I noted his well-fed complacency, and remembered + that he had been foraging around utterly oblivious + of the little tragedy being enacted in the alley, I lost my + patience and let fly a good-sized clod.</p> + + <p>But jays are jays, and it were unfair to demand from + <a class="pagenum" id="page36" title="36"> </a>them a standard of conduct that even human beings, with + all their centuries of moral education, find it hard to apply. + As a matter of fact the only jay I ever caught red-beaked + at such murderous work was the one in the alley, and my + field of observation has extended clear from the coast of + Maine part way to the Rocky Mountains. Yet if a man + from Mars were to pick up a bundle of newspapers, and + could make out the strange little characters imprinted + thereon, he would probably infer that murder was a + trade common enough among human beings, particularly + to-day. He would see it as a highly organized and severely + technical activity carried on by whole nations under the + direction of their respective governments. It must be + said, however, that although the sensitive nerve of national + honor seems oftenest to reside in the national belly, + nations rarely murder with the object of eating their victims. + And those jays that murder are censurable chiefly + in this: they have learned so little from humanity’s civilized + forbearance.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">To tell the truth, the jay is not the fiercely courageous + and militantly aggressive biped his harsh cries and erected + crest might lead one to suppose. His aspect is doubtless + frightful to some small birds, but most of them recognize + in him much of the Pistolian braggart. I have seen a + house-wren, about the size of a large colored gentleman’s + thumb, drive him away from her vine-shaded dwelling. + Robins quickly put him to flight, and so, too, do catbirds + and cardinals. Even the mourning dove (gentlest of + birds) does not fear to measure her mild weapons with his; + and one of the most amusing spectacles I ever witnessed + was the comical bluff of a dove who puffed out her breast, + fierce as a lamb, and literally pushed the swash-buckling + blue jay clean off the feed board.</p> + + <p>That the jay does not always exercise the discretion of + which the timid proverb speaks, the crown of my head + can very well testify. One pleasant afternoon, while I + <a class="pagenum" id="page37" title="37"> </a>was breathlessly pursuing the phantom of an idea through + the syntactical mazes of a freshman theme, I became aware + of the sharp screaming of a pair of jays directly beneath + my open window. I glanced out and saw (item) one baby + jay squatting all hunched up on the close-cut lawn in the + sunlight; (item) one long, lithe, black cat in the shadow + of the syringa bush, blinking its greedy yellow eyes + and moving its tail with a gentle, snaky, anticipatory + motion; and (item) two frantic parent jays darting viciously + at the black sphinx, and shrieking like a couple + of suffragettes in the hands of a pair of miserable London + bobbies. I watched the little drama until I saw the cat + quivering for the spring; whereupon, forsaking the rôle + of spectator, I threw my bottle of red ink and drove the + dark marauder from the field. Surely never was preceptorial + red ink put to more humane uses.</p> + + <p>As I turned back to my themes, it occurred to me that + here was the very opportunity I had been looking for. + My favorite hobby is taking bird pictures, and I had long + desired a picture of a young jay. Most fledgelings bear + a ludicrous likeness to very old men. They wear an expression + of solemn and pessimistic wisdom such as comes + only to those who have looked long on the vanities of + mankind. And it has always seemed to me that the infant + jay bears a weird resemblance to England’s Grand + Old Man, Mr. Gladstone, after he had passed the prime + of old age. Out of regard, then, for the great Liberal + minister, and also because I am no rifler of nests, I seized + my old black hat and a camera, and dashed downstairs. + My plan was to drop the hat over the unsuspecting + fledgeling so that I could pick him up without any fuss, + and pose him on the grape-vine behind the house. But + the young rascal, divining my intention, hopped away, + and kept with exasperating nicety just out of reach. + Finally, by dint of much scrambling along on my knees, + taking care to preserve as innocent an expression as I + could, I managed to clap the hat over him. But as I + <a class="pagenum" id="page38" title="38"> </a>took him out from the sudden gloom, he gave one terrified + shriek, and the next instant BING! something sharp, + something penetrating, something entirely unexpected, + struck me on the head. It was the marvellously efficient + beak of Mr. Jay.</p> + + <p>I did not try to reason with him or placate him in wheedling + tones. The ambient air was too full of a shrapnel + burst of screaming, darting, pecking, whirling, shrieking + blue jay. His shrill and angry cries, moreover, called to + his aid three other jays, and such a stream of feathered + Billingsgate followed as, I felt sure, must fix the eyes of all + the neighborhood upon me. And so I retreated to the + house, endeavoring in my gait to preserve that dignity of + bearing which is generally supposed to be the fruit of an + academic life. But the jay, with the uncomfortable persistence + of a bee or a small heel-snapping terrier, pursued + me to the very door, and might have chased me upstairs + had it not been for the screen. After that I decided never + again to attempt kidnapping a jay without the protection + of a policeman’s helmet.</p> + + <p>But the fierce detractors of the blue jay will doubtless + scoff at this as evidence of a sometimes resolute daring. + I do not resent the implied aspersion of my own courage; + I am content to leave that to the judgment of my readers. + There is, however, one bit of commendation to which + even they must “assent with civil ear,” as a freshman of + mine put it. The blue jay is almost humanly intelligent. + Mind, I do not argue that he can, offhand, give you the + distinction between free verse and a page from a real + poet’s note-book, or that he can explain precisely why + certain matters are deleted by the British censors. But + with the intrepidity of a new Congressman delivering a + speech in the <cite>Record</cite>, I dare assert, “without fear of + <em>successful</em> contradiction,” that the blue jay is among the + most intelligent of feathered bipeds.</p> + + <p>Not long ago, during a particularly sharp attack of + bitter weather, with frosty bayonets in the air but no + <a class="pagenum" id="page39" title="39"> </a>snow on the ground, I was holding a conference in the + English office with one of my students, a girl whose sweet + deep eyes gave no flicker of understanding as I tried to + make clear to her the difference between a sentence and + a clause. To conceal my sorrow I stepped to the window + and gazed off through the grayish-blue beeches with their + dead brown leaves shivering in the keen air, trying, meanwhile, + to recall what principle of pedagogic efficiency I had + failed to employ. Presently a blue jay with something + white in its beak alighted upon the twisted limb of a maple + not a rod from the window, and began a close inspection + of the rough bark. He found what he was looking for, + a hole; and into this he thrust the white substance which + he carried in his beak, suet possibly, from the feed-board + below, or a bit of bread. He cocked his head on one side + and eyed the little cache in a thoughtful manner. Then + he dropped to the ground.</p> + + <p>I thought that was the end, but I was mistaken. Soon + he shot up to the limb, this time with a dead leaf in his + beak. I watched intently and saw him carefully lay the + leaf over the hole where he had hidden the suet. A gust + of wind, however, blew the leaf off the limb, and sent it + swirling to the ground. Quick as a hawk the jay swooped + after it in an ineffectual attempt to capture it while it was + still in the air. They reached the ground together. Convinced + apparently that the leaf was too large, he selected + another, much smaller, and carried it up to the limb. + This time he did not merely lay the leaf over the hole; + he had learned his lesson. Instead, he rammed the leaf + into the hole on top of the suet, a really difficult job, and + packed it firmly with his beak. It was safe from the other + jays if not from the inquisitive redheaded woodpecker + who lived only a few branches away. Now all you host + of cocksure psychologists, was it instinct or reason that + led the jay?</p> + + <p>I know it has been argued that since a jay will attack a + stuffed owl placed near his nest, he must be without the + <a class="pagenum" id="page40" title="40"> </a>power of reason. The test seems hardly fair, for the + ghoulish mystery of the taxidermist is known to no animal + but man. Thus at the very start the jay is laid under + an unreasonable handicap. Consider, too, the ingeniously + cruel nature of this test; it pierces him as it were in the + eye of his most sensitive instinct. Even human parents, + faced by an ordeal at all comparable to this in sudden + poignancy, would scarcely act in a manner calmly rational. + What mother, leaving her infant slumbering in the cradle, + and suddenly returning to find a brutal visaged mannikin + bent over it in a posture of menace, would expend the + millionth of a second in the psychologist’s reflective delay? + Like the jay, she would act in such a situation from instinct + alone, nor would we consider her deficient in intelligence.</p> + + <p>But even if the jay were as stupid as an old-model political + prison-warden, or an English official in Ireland, which + he indubitably is not, I would still look upon him with an + indulgent eye. The redbird excepted, he is the sole bit + of lively color in our winter landscape. No matter how + sharp the wind or deep the snow, you will find him foraging + among the low bushes or uttering his cheerfully + vigorous <em>jay! jay! jay!</em> from the airy chambers of some tall, + bare maple. And if you are of that generous company + who share their winter bounty with the birds, from none + of your feathered charity scholars will you receive more + evident tokens of full appreciation than from the maligned + jay. He is as prompt to the feeding board as an impecunious + college professor to the bursar’s office at the + end of the first quarter. To be sure, his table manners + are somewhat rude, but what he lacks in elegance he more + than atones for with a certain robust beef-and-pudding + gusto that I have somehow come to associate with Lord + Macaulay.</p> + + <p>It is in the spring, however, in the days of warm sunshine + and clear air, when the grass begins to quicken along + the walks and around the roots of the big elm-trees, when + <a class="pagenum" id="page41" title="41"> </a>the vanguard of the crocus legions have thrust their green + spear-heads up through the sere lawn, and the buds on the + lilac bushes along the garden fence have begun to swell, + that the jay reveals how really amiable he can be. To + many who do not know him well it will come as a surprise + to learn that he possesses vocal attainments far beyond + the harsh cry from which he takes his name. Under the + spell of love he becomes truly melodic. He will sit for + ten minutes at a time in the old black cherry-tree, and + beginning with a soft, prelusory, ventriloquial whistle, as + though he were a musician testing his flute, he will run + through a series of little musical snatches surprising in + their mimetic variety. Now it will seem like a baby’s + silver rattle, or like clear water gurgling over a sunny bed + of pebbles; again you will hear a note or two of the robin, + or a plaintive echo of the bluebird’s song, or even the + beautiful sliding legato of the cardinal,—with a crack + in it, perhaps.</p> + + <p>As the head of a family the blue jay is exemplary. He + is not one of those who think they perform the whole duty + of husbands when they preen their gay feathers in the sunlight, + or lift their voices in flattering song, while their plain + little wives build the nest, hatch the eggs, and go in search + of the nourishing worm. Not much! He believes that + marriage is a partnership involving equal duties and + responsibilities; and so, during the nesting season, you + will see him busily at work, searching for the best twigs, + paper, string, tendrils, and rootlets obtainable. I once + saw a nest that had a piece of yellow paper sticking out + of its side, with the cryptic legend—<em>otes for wom</em>—plainly + legible on it, but I am not sure that it had any real + significance. Feeding the young jays, too, he considers + part of his fatherly duties, and sometimes, though not + often, he even treats Mrs. Jay to a specially delicate + tidbit of bug or worm. If the latter should happen to be + fuzzy, he will follow his careful wife’s example and thoroughly + wipe the fuzz off on the rough bark of some tree.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page42" title="42"> </a>And he likes his bath; no monocled Englishman better. + Indeed, if you really wish to enjoy a treat, set a rusty + shallow pan of water on your lawn, not <em>too</em> near the tulip-bed + or shrubbery (Cats!), and see what follows. If you + have been thoughtful enough to place a stone or a piece of + brick near the rim of the pan, Mr. and Mrs. Jay will step + right in and enjoy a thorough wetting without much + preliminary skirmishing. But little Willie Jay and his + four brothers will exhibit all the delicious trepidation of + childhood. While their parents are in the bath, they will + be bold enough, even to running up and allowing themselves + to be splashed on; but when it comes to actually + entering the water, ugh! They will linger around the + edge of the pan, fluttering their wings, hop across it, dip + their beaks into the water, turn around, and splash the + water with their tails—in short, go through all the motions + of a small boy having his first “duck under” without + the assuring grasp of his father’s strong hand. But once + let them get in, and oh, what a joyous splashing ensues, + what a ruffling of feathers, what a beating of wings, what + a fan-like fluttering of the tail! Like most small boys, + too, they will stay in until they are thoroughly soaked, + scarcely able, in fact, to fly up to some sunny limb where + they may preen themselves and dry off out of harm’s reach.</p> + + <p>No, the jay is not an unprincipled scoundrel, not the + bloodthirsty reprobate he is sometimes made out to be. + He has his faults, it is true, properly censurable; but he + has some very commendable virtues as well. And I am + sure that if the reader will watch his career as carefully + as I have, from his fledgeling childhood to his gay and + dashing cavalier youth, he will agree with me that the + imaginations of the blue jay’s heart are not wholly evil.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_4"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page43" title="43"> </a>THE FLEMISH QUESTION</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><em lang="la" xml:lang="la"><span class="first_word">Divide</span> ut imperes</em>—make a faction among your + enemies, and thus overcome them. This is German + policy all over the world. By it the Danes of Slesvig + have been to a large extent robbed of their own language + and national traditions. By it the Prussian intruders + have, with characteristic inability to understand foreign + souls, endeavored, in their periods of repose after acts + of brutality, to alienate from France the French-speaking + and French-minded inhabitants of Alsace and Lorraine. + It has failed not only there, but notoriously also in Posen + or Prussian Poland, where it was long ago abandoned in + favor of a system of downright and unscrupulous repression. + It has succeeded, for the moment at least, in Russia, + which now lies dismembered at the feet of a triumphant + betrayer. What was a year ago Russia is now + dissolved into Lithuania, Livonia, Esthonia, Courland, + Finland, Poland, the Ukraine, the country of the Don + Cossacks, the Caucasus, and the vague and fluctuating + realm of Bolshevism. Historic memories, linguistic variations, + religious differences, local jealousies, class feeling, + and commercial rivalries have been emphasized by + German agents behind the frontier, and through the + gaps thus made the German sword has pushed its point, + breaking up the old mortar of loyalty and union. One + typical example of the method employed may be cited + here. According to the Berlin <cite>Lokal Anzeiger</cite> of March 26, + 1917, Zimmermann, the German Secretary of State + for Foreign Affairs, our Zimmermann, welcomed a delegation + of Lithuanians and piped sweetly to them about + the tender interest his government took in the welfare + of their people, promising to satisfy various local desires. + We have seen the result.</p> + + <p>German intrigue of the same sort has long been at + <a class="pagenum" id="page44" title="44"> </a>work in India, where it has happily been baffled by the + good sense of the Indian population who appreciate the + fact that with all their numerous languages, races, and + religions, they owe their concord to the light rule of Britain + and to her even-handed justice. One of the boldest, + meanest, and cruelest instances of the same policy of + treacherous penetration was the effort to cause a rebellion + in Ireland, for the Germans knew that rebellion meant + the destruction of their own tools and Ireland’s shame + and ruin. As Americans, we have reason to keep our + eyes upon the large German colonies in southern Brazil + and upon the outposts of German imperialism in Mexico, + Chile, and Argentina, and still greater reason to look + out for the thin wedges of Prussian intrigue insinuating + themselves among our own many racial and confessional + varieties.</p> + + <p>The most thinly disguised of all German attempts to + conquer by division is also one of the latest to be disclosed, + although it began at least three years ago. “Love + me,” says the Kaiser to the outraged daughters of the + Belgian household; “or if you will not both love me, I + shall take the likelier of you, and give her a seat at the + royal feast, and put my ring upon her finger, and make + her sister serve us in our mirth.”</p> + + <p>As is well known, there is no such thing as a Belgian + language, and the people of Belgium speak one or both + of two languages, French and Flemish. Both French and + Flemish are and have long been officially recognized by + the Belgian government, and are used in Parliament, in + public documents, in the courts, and in the national + schools. The French spoken and written by educated Belgians + is standard or central French, differing in no essential + respect from the language of France; but among the + people who have French as their native tongue, the Walloons, + there is employed a dialect of French, just as the + people of many parts of France, and indeed of all countries, + have their local dialects. The Walloons differ from + <a class="pagenum" id="page45" title="45"> </a>the rest of the Belgians chiefly in language and in the fact + that they inhabit the southern and southeastern parts + of the kingdom, where mining and metallurgical industry + are highly developed. They also have more points of + contact with France, both geographically and morally. + If you take a map of Belgium and draw a line from Visé, + the point where the Meuse passes into Holland, almost + straight west through Brussels, Audenarde, and Courtrai, + or a little south of these cities, you will have traced + the northern boundary of the Walloon country. Almost + anywhere along this imaginary line, one can, by going + a short distance south, be among people who nearly all + speak French or the Walloon dialect of French, and, by + going a little way north, be among people who, though + they may write French and speak it as an acquired language, + use Flemish as their native tongue. Nevertheless, + in this densely populated, busy, rich, and closely + unified kingdom, the various elements of the population + were happily mingled. Thousands of Belgian families + are part Walloon and part Flemish. When a Walloon + family moves north into a Flemish village it usually + changes its language in the second generation, and vice + versa. Many Walloons have Flemish names; many + Flemings have Walloon names.</p> + + <p>Flemish is scarcely distinguishable from Dutch. Although + philologically they may be regarded as twin dialects + of one tongue, they are for practical purposes the + same. There are, to be sure, a few slight differences of + idiom, and numerous differences of vocabulary, even between + standard written Flemish and standard written + Dutch, but scarcely more important than those between + the English of Mr. Howells and the English of Mr. Hardy. + In popular speech the gap is naturally wider, and perhaps + justifies the view that Flemish and Dutch are separate + dialects of one language, though “dialect” may + really be too strong a word. From my own observation + in East Flanders, I should say that a Dutchman would be + <a class="pagenum" id="page46" title="46"> </a>in about the same situation there with regard to difference + of speech as a New Englander in Virginia.</p> + + <p>According to the census of 1910, there were in Belgium + about 3,832,000 persons speaking French or belonging + to French-speaking families, and about 4,153,000 speaking + Flemish or belonging to Flemish families. The Flemish + population, being to a larger extent agricultural, has + for many years been increasing faster than the Walloons. + Yet French, being by acquisition or second-nature a language + perfectly familiar to all educated Belgians, appears + to have, and really has, an immense advantage + over Flemish. The literature of the French language is + enriched and glorified with the names of many great authors, + from Jean Froissart and Philippe de Comines to + Maeterlinck and Verhaeren, who belong by birth or residence + to what we now call Belgium.</p> + + <p>But the Flemish had, and probably always will have, + a pride of their own. In the Middle Ages their cities + were among the first in Northern Europe to emerge from + obscurity. The names of Flemish towns strike the ear with + a strange ruggedness in the liquid lapse of Dante’s lines, + but a stranger thing it is that even in the thirteenth century + these vigorous municipalities were looked to for independence, + and called upon for vengeance on tyranny; + we hear, in the Purgatorio, of “the evil plant that overshadows + all the Christian land,” and are told that “if + Douai, Lille, Ghent and Bruges had power, there would + soon be vengeance taken.” A curious example this of + “ancestral voices prophesying war.”</p> + + <p>In the sixteenth century Flanders was the scene of + tragic resistance to Spain and the Inquisition. Liberty + was lost and recovered and lost again; but prosperity + still bloomed from the ashes of destroyed commerce, the + language and institutions of the land were redeemed with + a fearful price, civilization was preserved with blood and + sorrow, art flourished in the midst of horrors; and how all + this came to pass is explained only by the stubbornness + <a class="pagenum" id="page47" title="47"> </a>with which the people kept up their local patriotism. + The visible signs of this municipal pride and glory were, + until four years ago, and in part still are, the great churches, + town-halls, and guild-houses of Flanders. Among the + most impressive of these monuments were the Cloth + Hall at Ypres, the Belfry of Bruges, the Town-halls of + Audenarde, Alost, Termonde, Louvain, Brussels, and + Ghent, the Cathedrals of Antwerp and Malines, the + quaint Béguinages or cities of retirement for religious + women, and many another less renowned but hardly less + beautiful expression of ancient faith and community of + enterprise.</p> + + <p>The Austrian yoke was shaken off at the time of the + French Revolution, and after a short period of republican + government Belgium, together with France, came + under the domination of Napoleon. At the Congress + of Vienna, in 1815, Belgium and Holland were united + under the name of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, in + an ill-assorted combination which lasted only till 1830, + when the present Kingdom of Belgium was established. + From that year to 1914 the Flemish people of Belgium, + though more than satisfied to live in political union with + the Walloons, and indeed being the more prosperous and + rapidly growing part of the population, were solicitous + to preserve their local customs and particularly their + own language. Societies were formed for the cultivation + of Flemish literature. Endowments for the same + purpose were established. One of the parliamentary + aims of political parties in the provinces of East and + West Flanders and Antwerp and the northern sections + of Brabant and Limbourg was the safe-guarding of + Flemish as one of the official languages and a medium + of instruction. There was not the slightest flavor of + disloyalty in this desire. It was entirely constitutional. + It expressed itself openly, and had no need for secrecy. + The tendency thus created was called the Flamingant + movement. No one connected with it, so far as I can + <a class="pagenum" id="page48" title="48"> </a>discover, entertained the slightest notion of appealing + to Germany for countenance or support. The Flemings + in general and the Flamingants in particular would + have been the last people in the world to admit that + their language was a dialect of <em>German</em> or that their + manifest destiny was absorption in the German Empire. + The unity of Belgium was as precious to them as to the + Walloons, and was placed above every consideration of + race and speech. But there is no country under the sun + in which local self-government and community interests + are so highly developed as in Belgium. Under the + Belgian constitution the communes enjoy the maximum + of freedom. Civic pride nowhere else burns so bright. + It is the habit of local self-government, the strong personalities + developed under this system, and the spirit + of the communes that have saved Belgium from starvation + during the war. As every one of Mr. Hoover’s + American delegates in Belgium will testify, the spectacle + was and is magnificent. As early as October, 1914, when + the wave of invasion had passed over Belgium, the communes + stood firm, and in all of them committees with + almost absolute power, and enjoying the perfect confidence + of the people, were formed and got to work commandeering + the visible supply of food and distributing + it prudently.</p> + + <p>Within a very short time after the invasion the Germans + showed that they intended to take advantage of + the difference between Flemings and Walloons, a difference + which, as we have seen, was purely domestic, and + concerned with no really vital political issue. Among + the offices of his hated administration, Governor-General + von Bissing established a bureau for dealing with “the + Flemish question,” a bureau consisting of German specialists + in philology and discord. For about seven months, + this commission, which was working in secret, attracted + hardly any attention. Then it began to operate visibly. + In the summer of 1915, I was stationed, as delegate of + <a class="pagenum" id="page49" title="49"> </a>the Hoover commission, in Ghent, the capital of East + Flanders, and witnessed the beginning of German coquetry. + As may be imagined, it was very clumsy and + ineffectual. One day an attempt would be made to + flatter the local pride of the peasants by printing official + notices and war bulletins in Flemish and German only, + instead of Flemish, German, and French, as had previously + been the practice; the next day they would be informed, + in these same posters, that they must surrender + their hay-crop to the German military authorities. The + Germans appeared to be as much detested in Flanders + as anywhere else in Belgium. I saw the wife of a distinguished + citizen of Ghent burst into tears of vexation + and anxiety because a German officer of high rank spoke + to her in a restaurant. She said she feared she would be + distrusted for the rest of her life by her fellow-citizens + for having listened to a German officer. Yet he was evidently + a gentleman, behaved with propriety, and had + the excuse for addressing her that he was quartered in + her house. I have known persons in Ghent to go willingly + to prison rather than comply with German rules or pay + fines into the German treasury. “Do you see that man?” + said to me an acquaintance in Ghent one day, pointing + to a German in uniform who was speaking Flemish to + some peasants. “He lived here before the war; he will + not be able to live here after the war; his life will not be + safe.”</p> + + <p>Before the war there were four universities in Belgium: + the Catholic university of Louvain, the liberal or + non-sectarian university of Brussels, and the two state + universities of Liége and Ghent. The instruction was + given entirely in French, except that there were certain + courses at Louvain and Ghent which were paralleled, + rather expensively, one would think, by courses in Flemish. + In 1911 a bill was introduced in the Belgian Parliament + looking to the gradual transformation of the + University of Ghent into an institution completely Flemish. + <a class="pagenum" id="page50" title="50"> </a>In 1912 this proposal was again discussed, and was + reported favorably in the Chamber of Representatives. + The war of course put an end to the project.</p> + + <p>Now the Germans have taken it up with enthusiasm, + trying to harvest for their own purposes the sympathies + that were formerly cultivated in its favor. Whether they + annex all or part or none of Belgium, they desire to pose + as the liberators of Flanders, and to foment a permanent + jealousy between the Flemish-speaking people + and the rest of the Belgian population. This is precisely + like their conduct in the south of Ireland, in the Province + of Quebec, and in Russia. They have their eye on Antwerp, + which they intend to keep, whatever happens, and + they realize that Flanders would be a good basis for the + eventual absorption of Holland.</p> + + <p>On December 2, 1915, it became known in Belgium + that the German authorities purposed to reopen the + University of Ghent, which of course had been closed, + and to make Flemish the language of instruction. Their + design was instantly understood by everybody, including + the leaders of the old Flamingant movement, who, + instead of falling in with it, met it with a vigorous protest. + This was disregarded, and on the 31st of December + the decree was promulgated. A commission of German + professors was empowered to draw up regulations + for carrying out the plan of transformation. Meanwhile, + in order to encourage as many Belgian young men as + possible to escape from the country and find their way + into the Belgian army, the real authorities of the four + universities were keeping these institutions closed. + Their passive resistance enraged the Germans, who, on + March 18, 1916, arrested the two most celebrated professors + of Ghent, Henri Pirenne, and Paul Frédéricq, + eminent historians, and sent them to prison-camps in + Germany, where they have been treated with disgusting + brutality. The colleagues of these two brave men were + not less courageous themselves, and signed a second protest. + <a class="pagenum" id="page51" title="51"> </a>Thereupon the Germans made up a ridiculous + little faculty of their own, and imposed it upon the university, + which, we must remember had no students. + There were at first seven of these professors, of whom + one was a German, another a native of the Grand Duchy + of Luxembourg, and five were Belgians without distinction + in the learned world or respectability as citizens. + To these were later added a number of equally insignificant + Dutch and German teachers of minor rank, and a + very few Belgians. Opinion in Holland rose in disgust, + and an unpleasant life awaits the Dutch instructors if + they ever dare return to the land of their birth. They + have been canny enough to make sure of pensions from + the German government, in view of the probability that + they will in the near future be men without a country.</p> + + <p>On April 5, 1916, the German Chancellor, making a + curious mixture of cynicism and hypocrisy, in a speech + before the Reichstag, promised that the Imperial Government + would help the Flemish population to free itself + from “the preponderance of French culture.” The Germans + no doubt expected some backing from the Flamingant + societies, the trustees of the Flemish endowment + funds, and the former political supporters of the Flemish + movement. In this they have been disappointed, for + their conduct has aroused protest upon protest from all + these quarters. It is difficult to determine, from the + boasts in the German newspapers and the denials of exiled + Belgians, just how many teachers and students had + been scraped together by the beginning of 1917, but the + faculty was a motley collection of German, Dutch and + Belgian nonentities, and there were less than three students + for every teacher. To-day there is only one student + in agriculture, the subject that would naturally be + most sought in a Flemish university. Of all the war-babies, + this University of Ghent is surely the most + anæmic. Yet if we are to believe General von Bissing + in the speech in which he declared it alive and viable, + <a class="pagenum" id="page52" title="52"> </a>“The God of War held it at the baptismal font with + naked sword in hand!” This is <em lang="de" xml:lang="de">echt Deutsch</em> in taste and + feeling. And while these proceedings were solemnly + going on, the deportation of workmen from Ghent was + beginning; on the very day of inauguration, husbands + and fathers were being torn from their families to suffocate + in German salt-mines, to sweat and faint in German + collieries, to dig and die in German trenches. Has the + world ever seen a more revolting instance of hypocrisy? + I happened to be in Courtrai one morning when a number + of Flemish wives and mothers were herded into the + jail there, from the village of Sweveghem, because their + men had refused to make barbed wire for the Germans. + International law forbids a conqueror to compel the + vanquished to produce munitions of war, but what of + that!</p> + + <p>Parallel with the ludicrous pretence of enriching Belgium + with a Germano-Flemish university, close observers + of Belgian affairs, by reading the Dutch and German + newspapers, have watched the development of another + German scheme for producing discord. On February 14, + 1917, thirty Belgian tools of the German military authorities + set themselves up, or rather were set up by + German backers, as a “Council of Flanders,” with the + avowed purpose of creating an autonomous state out + of the Flemish-speaking portion of Belgium. The plot + began to culminate in Baron von Bissing’s decree of + March 21, 1917, establishing two administrative regions, + one Flemish, the other Walloon. Brussels was to be + the capital of the former, Namur of the latter. This + decree sent consternation into the hearts of all true Belgians, + and has led finally to an ominous result, the resignation + of nearly all the Belgian judiciary. Up to this + time, protected by international law and by the national + constitution, which even the Germans professed to respect, + the magistrates of Belgium had continued to perform + some of their functions, thereby shielding the people + <a class="pagenum" id="page53" title="53"> </a>to a certain extent from direct contact with German + judges and police officers, and no doubt saving the country + from bloody and useless insurrections: for if the minute + and daily administration of local affairs, such as + the collection of private debts and the enforcement of + town ordinances, had been all this time in German hands, + the irritation would have been unbearable.</p> + + <p>With a few delightful exceptions, newspapers in Belgium, + even though appearing under their old names + and in French, are controlled by the Germans. I used + to amuse myself, in 1915, by translating passages from + <cite>Le Bruxellois</cite>, ostensibly a real Belgian journal, back + into the German in which they were originally written + or thought. The style betrayed a Teutonic source. The + delightful exceptions are the brave little clandestine + <cite>Libre Belgique</cite> and other papers of a similar character, + which keep up the spirits of the Belgian people and + drive the Germans to impotent fury.</p> + + <p>In this case, as in that of the University of Ghent, + the Germans professed to be responding to Belgian desires. + They point to the so-called Council of Flanders, + in reality a collection of renegade Belgians who were + brought together by German influence, and protected + by German arms from the violence of Flemish mobs, + who dared to hiss them and insult them. A delegation + of these worthies was conducted to Berlin, where they + presented a humble request for the strangulation of Belgian + liberty and the partition of their native land. Against + this plot all Belgium has risen. How can Belgium have + risen? The answer will give some idea of the bravery of + those people, even in the isolation and darkness and + hunger of their present life. Last June between four + and five hundred Belgian magistrates and members of + the bar signed a fruitless petition to the German Chancellor + against the decree. Judges and local administrative + officials gave up their functions and their livelihood. + For this, many of them were arrested and + <a class="pagenum" id="page54" title="54"> </a>deported to Germany. Against the decree of separation, + and in favor of “the Belgian Fatherland, Free and Indivisible,” + petitions have been signed by nearly all the + former senators and deputies remaining in Belgium, by + the Flamingant leaders, by municipal councils, and by + the heroic Cardinal Mercier. The Cardinal especially + drew attention to the fact that international law demands + that the domestic administration of an invaded + country shall be allowed to proceed unmolested, if + military necessity permits. To this point Baron von + Falkenhausen, the German Governor-General, made + the following insolent rejoinder: “Your Eminence addressed + to me on the 6th of June a letter in which, taking + your stand on the principles of international law, you + criticize certain of my official acts. I must respectfully + reply to your Eminence that I refuse to enter with you + upon a discussion of this subject.”</p> + + <p>Decree has followed decree with steady insistence. + The courts, even in Brussels, which is mainly a French-speaking + city, must hold their sessions in Flemish; official + correspondence north of the imaginary line must be in + Flemish; the Official Bulletin of German Laws and Decrees + in Occupied Belgium is printed in German and + Flemish for one part of the country and in German and + French for the other. On August 9, 1917, von Falkenhausen + issued an edict declaring that in the Flemish + administrative region “Flemish must be the exclusive + official language of all the authorities and all the functionaries + of the state, the provinces, and the communes, + as well as their establishments, including educational institutions + and the teachers therein.” On October 6 the + communes in the Province of Brabant were ordered immediately + to organize courses in Flemish for the instruction + of their employees who did not know that language.</p> + + <p>The invaders have tried to create a Belgian faction + in support of their policy, and have here and there, at + different times, organized meetings and processions of + <a class="pagenum" id="page55" title="55"> </a>so-called “Activists,” or pro-German Belgians. But these + assemblages have never been other than contemptible in + size and composition. They have been hissed and mobbed + by vast crowds of patriotic Belgians, and in Belgium + it takes courage to attack a movement which is protected + by German bayonets. On February 9, 1918, + the Chief Justice and two Associate Judges of the Belgian + Court of Appeals at Brussels were arrested for instituting + proceedings against the “Activists,” and were + ordered to be deported to Germany.</p> + + <p>With all their cunning the Germans in Belgium have + shown themselves densely stupid. Their near-sighted + pedantry inclines them to put their trust in formulas, + when the thing they are dealing with is life. They think + they can <em>decree</em> an indomitable people into submission. + Having begun with butchery, they declined into robbery, + and now they imagine that because bribery is less rude, + it will be regarded as a sort of mercy. Jealous and quarrelsome + at home, fussy and petty in their own local and + domestic affairs, they cannot understand magnanimity + in others. German writers have often admitted and lamented + the tendency of the German people to be parochial + (<em lang="de" xml:lang="de">kleinstädtisch</em>) in their outlook, and stencilled + (<em lang="de" xml:lang="de">schablonenhaft</em>) in their personality. So they are; and + these bad qualities render them incapable of understanding + the spirit of Belgium, which is independent, + individual, far-sighted, and bold. Since July, 1914, + the German heel has stamped its imprint on regions several + times as extensive as the German Empire itself. But + a nation of pedants will never rule the world, and the + echo of those iron-bound, blood-spattered boots will + cease to ring when the American people realize that what + the Germans have done in Belgium they will try to do + wherever they find room to tramp.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_5"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page56" title="56"> </a>IMMORTALITY IN LITERATURE</h2> + + <p class="epigram">“<em lang="it" xml:lang="it">Come l’uom s’eterna</em>”</p> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">Now</span> that the immortals in literature have been + caught and measured; now that we know that + they fill not more than five feet of shelf room, we may be + pardoned for asking a question or two as to how they + “arrived,” what their chances are for “staying put,” + and whether the place for classics is inevitably “upon the + shelf.” These are of course awkward questions, but there + are other regions beside heaven which one must be as a + little child to enter—the Garden of Understanding + among them.</p> + + <p>It is in a certain sense a positive relief to find that the + really persistent literature of the past is so compressible, + and it is reassuring as one looks forward to the long future, + to think that the people towards the end of time will not + be so unimaginably burdened with the deathless monuments + of their past; although when one multiplies five + feet, the sediment of five millennia, by x, the classic + library of the end of things seems to us of this unheroic + age, a trifle depressing. Of course, the men of the Ultima + Thule of time may take their classics less seriously, and + it may be that they will find less of a gap than we between + the thoughts and speech of the immortals and those of + daily intercourse. But since the immortals die not, there + is no escaping their accumulation.</p> + + <p>Yet after all, come to think of it, there is a good deal + of an assumption in the assertion that our five feet of + immortals are all going to perch upon that last library + shelf. There have been immortals of the past who failed + to reach even our days; had they all fulfilled their promise + and the prophecies of their friends, the publishers would + not be willing to let us buy our modest set of unquestionable + classics on monthly payments without the guarantee + <a class="pagenum" id="page57" title="57"> </a>of our great grandchildren. Paradoxical as it may seem, + many immortals have proved mortal, and the deathless + have died. We must lay this troublesome fact to the + loose speech of our forefathers. They were hyperbolic + now and then, and they dubbed a volume immortal + without stopping to think whether the twentieth century + A. D. would also find it interesting, and so, of course, + really immortal. Humanity has been fallible in the past, + and the result is that we are forced most unscientifically + to accept contradictory ideas with gravity—in short, + to speak of “relative immortality.” The work that + outlives its contemporaries is, we may admit, relatively + deathless. Such a statement makes no prophecy, however, + as to the remote future. Relative immortality + merely means that a work goes on interesting for a few + years, a generation or two, a century or more. It is only + the simon pure immortal who will not have to get up at + the sound of Gabriel’s trump. Blessed relief—the final + shelf of unforgettable classics may be only five feet long + after all, and may be even shorter!</p> + + <p>Naturally, your enduring work must have a strong + constitution; it must have all the characteristics of a live + creature except the power of growth within itself, and, + alas, of propagating its kind. Perhaps one might liken + it to the Leyden jar which we of the older generation + used to read of in our physics—I do not know + whether it is remembered now-a-days. It has a charge + of electricity of more or less strength, and it has a + retaining capacity of more or less endurance, so that + to touch it as the ages pass, is to receive a spark of life.</p> + + <p>Many a work has started out with a tremendous appeal + to its first audience, but has not been able to hold its + second or third. The first night is not always a sure test + of the length of a “run.” Such a work had a momentary + word to speak which was appropriate, which came as pat + as Vice in the old comedy; but like a jest called out by a + passing event, it raised its crackle of laughter and died. + <a class="pagenum" id="page58" title="58"> </a>One need not go far to find examples. Mrs. Radcliffe’s + <cite>Mysteries of Udolpho</cite> is pigeonholed here; and <cite>Uncle + Tom’s Cabin</cite> and <cite>The Jungle</cite> are tied by the same + tape, in spite of a certain uncanny habit of reappearance + of Mrs. Stowe’s painful tale. Much literature of this + sort is, of course, temporarily valuable; but Time promptly + and wisely puts it into the wallet at his back. Without + endurance, fame is as the fire of thorns under the pot; + without vitality, naught can endure.</p> + + <p>As a matter of fact a work need not be brutally vital + to have a fair chance at long life. It must interest somebody + very much indeed. Of course, the great immortals + start out in life popular in the best sense; but there are + lesser immortals too. One does not have to be Dante or + Shakespeare to win out. So long as the second class + passengers persist in interesting a few hearers on the + various stages of the road, they will not be forgotten. + They may be, as they usually are, caviare to the general, + but they find from age to age fit audience. Poets like + Horace and Spenser and Blake, the authors of <cite>Emma</cite> + or <cite>Cranford</cite> may cross the final line side by side with + their great competitors. And some of us who venture + diffident prophecy, expect greater endurance for Mr. + Robert Frost and his shy <cite>North of Boston</cite> than for the + dramatic anachronisms of the late Stephen Phillips, + or the epic <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">longueurs</em> of Mr. Alfred Noyes. Long life in + literature concerns itself with the length of Clotho’s + thread, and not at all with the question as to whether + it be labelled “No. 60” or “No. 90.”</p> + + <p>But to have transcended its own time by a generation + or so is no promise of immortality. Every work if not + hopelessly tangled in the perishabilities of its own age, + is liable to be so tangled in those of its own century or + epoch. How often have men watched with exultation + the endurance of a work, and jumped to conclusions, + when wisdom would have recognized that it could last + only while certain ideals or moods prevailed. Was not + <a class="pagenum" id="page59" title="59"> </a>Byron a god for a generation? But, alas, as the waters + of time rose, he found himself caught in the eel-grass of + romanticism, and pulled under. And did not the <cite>Romance + of the Rose</cite> hold men bound by its myriad lines for centuries—and + where is it now? Dusty upon dusty shelves. + Its voice was that of Mediævalism, not of humanity. It + perished with the conventions and provincialism of its + era.</p> + + <p>The time never was when a new work appeared to the + world without some external circumstance to modify for + good or ill its early reputation. Even the “anonymous” + early ballads must have depended at first in some measure + upon the impression of “good time” which lingered in + the minds of the junketers among whom they sprang up. + Even the <cite>Iliad</cite> or the <cite>Song of Roland</cite> must have gained + or lost according to the effectiveness of the reciter or + the social status of the patron. And to-day it is a thousand + times truer than ever before, that at the start the + genuine fame which endures is bound up with much that + is purely factitious.</p> + + <p>A new book comes to birth and finds a waiting world + to welcome, but not impartial in its attitude. Have not + the friends and family announced the arrival in joyful + and ringing tones? Advertiser and advance reviewer + have been busy; the publisher now-a-days is preëminently + efficient. The result is a sort of pre-natal notoriety built + up regardless of real worth. The advertising campaign + may be likened to an attack by gas-bombs on the reading + public; but fortunately from long experience a large part + of the public has provided itself with a tolerably good + supply of masks to receive the assault, and—to finish + the figure with all possible despatch—“waits till the + clouds roll by.”</p> + + <p>Then for the first time, the work gradually emerges + for what it is worth. The public reads and judges; recommends + it to its friends, or warns them off; and speaks the + fateful word, which if it is favorable, leads others to read, + <a class="pagenum" id="page60" title="60"> </a>and at least makes strangers admit that the book is “well + spoken of.” Here is real fame, still struggling for existence, + yet independent of the handicaps of early puffing. + Yet it must be said in all fairness that the early puffing, + with its manufactured audience, hastens for the good book + the chance for genuine fame; and makes more decisive + the collapse of the poor book, by bringing sooner to proof + the pinchbeck prophecies.</p> + + <p>But even then the new book has got to stand up against + convictions and prejudices, conventions and dogmas. + The public at large—and incidentally the professional + critic—wants more of “the same thing,” more like that + of its earlier loves and admirations. Figures of previous + experience rise in the readers’ minds with malicious menaces + against the upstart—Dickens, Austen or Trollope; + Ward, Sinclair or Tarkington; perhaps Fielding or Goldsmith—figures + moribund or vigorous still, all are alert + to impose “has been” upon “to be.” Let the new book + differ at its peril; it becomes easily “revolutionary,” + “decadent,” “not art”—is damned, in short, unless, by + a curious freak of the moment, it takes the world by storm + through its very “freshness.” And even then Kipling + joins the ring, and henceforth struggles to impose the + Kiplingesque. Such dangers, such threats—mostly + unreal when brought to the proof—the new book must + live through. The vigorous and vital book will be unabashed, + for its claims to long life must rest on stronger + virtues than conformity or non-conformity.</p> + + <p>The ages confirm with Jovian nod the trite fact that + every period has a general cast of opinion about any + literary work. San Francisco may not accept the same + order among “the best sellers” as New York, nor New + York as London; yet we accept the unity of age in our + use of older epithets, such as “Elizabethan” and “Victorian,” + even while we overlook it in the hurlyburly of + the present. It is a complicated and, perhaps, ultimately, + an inexplicable phenomenon; but strong leadership plays + <a class="pagenum" id="page61" title="61"> </a>its part in clarifying and fixing the momentary appraisement. + Let Dr. Johnson or the <cite>Edinburgh Review</cite> utter a + critical judgment, and society follows like the traditional + flock of sheep. If such notorious dictatorship is rare in + our larger world, there are yet many smaller Judges and + Prophets scattered abroad, apparent mouthpieces of the + <em lang="de" xml:lang="de">Zeitgeist</em>. We are all familiar with the small theatre + party. One or two members have definite ideas about + the play and its presentation, and the rest experience all + the sensations but are more or less neutral. The neutrals + inevitably fall in behind the leaders, and the whole party + is easily unanimous. Such in miniature is the working + of the critical leadership at large. The only requirement + is, that the leader must not be too far ahead or behind + his time. Thus it would have taken more than Dryden + to make Whitman a success in the days of the Restoration; + and we can hardly fancy Jeffreys forcing <cite>The Widow in + the Bye Street</cite> upon the Edinburgh subscribers. But as + all real leadership is moderate, neat unity seems to be + fairly easy to the backward look.</p> + + <p>Yet the judgment of an age may seem to us the veriest + nonsense of perversity. It irritates us, at the same time + that it flatters our sense of superiority, to see the citizens + of the Seventeenth Century tossing up their caps over + Cowley, and proclaiming him celestial; and to see those + of the Eighteenth lose their heads over Pope. We know + better. Cowley and Pope, indeed! Would not any college + sophomore place them for us—Why, of course, + Cowley wrote the <cite>Sonnets of Pindar</cite>, and Pope was a + pseudonym. It is pedantic to have read them, and we + are proud to know them only by reputation. Yet we + must not blame our unfortunate ancestors. The old + formula reappears:—they clung to what interested them, + and called it deathless. The humor lies rather more in + the inability of the next generation, perhaps our own, to + break away from the stereotyped verdicts of those remote + days of questionable authority. We were all taught that + <a class="pagenum" id="page62" title="62"> </a>Addison was one of the mighty of earth, and that his + style was the acme of lucidity and charm—“Spend + your days and nights with Addison.” But we must + admit that this estimate is but the sluggish echo of auld + lang syne. For have you, gentle reader, perused a single + <cite>Spectator</cite> Paper since you were preparing for your college + examinations? Of course, if Addison really interested + his own age by touching as no one else did its concerns, + he deserved the audience he gathered about him and + the fame that transpired; but why should we talk of him + as if he actually interested us profoundly, when no one + reads him? And how about <cite>Tom Jones</cite> and <cite>Clarissa + Harlowe</cite> and <cite>The Tale of a Tub</cite>, and <cite>Tristram Shandy</cite> or + <cite>The Vicar of Wakefield</cite>? It is the tendency of long enduring + fame to become sluggish and to sink into dogmatism.</p> + + <p>It is one of the duties lying nearest to the present—wherever + that present may be—to right the wrongs of + the weak, and to humble the pride of usurpers. Distrust + of one’s own taste and power, whatever may be the case + among individuals, is impossible to a whole generation. + To judge and to accept as final one’s own conclusion is + the prerequisite for true results and positive progress. + The saints have always been vigorous in their unshaken + conviction of the truth that is in them; it is the insinuating + voice of the devil which doubts. So, without misgiving, + the Eighteenth Century which wrote up Addison, wrote + down Shakespeare; and the Nineteenth Century which + wrote up Browning, wrote down Pope. We, too, are + conscious of wise catholicity, and judge with decisive + orthodoxy. We adore the vigorous brutalities of Kipling + and Masefield, we are interested in the formless + feebleness of certain new poets; we scorn Gray and + Landor, and overlook the poetry of Arnold. We are + hospitable to the “newer movements,” even to the <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">outré</em>; + we despise the ways of our parents and our grandparents, + though they were men who walked with God. We cannot + help it, to be sure, and are most unconscious of our little + <a class="pagenum" id="page63" title="63"> </a>ways; but now and then it is possible for some of us to + transport ourselves in spirit to the higher ground of the + next century, and to look back upon the plain of our own + time. Then it is hard to be convinced that the universe + was not devised to furnish laughter for the gods.</p> + + <p>Nothing is harder than for us to laugh at ourselves; we + prefer to dwell upon the seriousness, the impressiveness + of lasting fame, as proof of the unity of the human race. + When the world of twenty-five centuries after Homer + can thrill at the twang of the bow of Odysseus, and smile + at the laughter of Nausikaa and her maidens, we are kinsmen + of the distant Greeks. Time and race are annihilated + before the mighty genius which touches the deeps of the + heart. Institutions and nations may decay, but the + song of Homer calls us brothers. Impressive, indeed, + and yet—how many really thrill and smile over the + Odyssean tale? How many in this age of broad enlightenment + ever read the <cite>Odyssey</cite> at all, or have dipped into its + pages for love of their pure serene? The candid answer + is: Very few. And yet Homer is one of the two or three + who reign supreme, as we almost all still conventionally + admit.</p> + + <p>This vaunted proof of racial unity is overworked; + Homer has but few relatives to-day, and they are that + select handful who love to widen their horizons by looking + backwards. In spite of our boasted education—which + does not, any more than other panaceas, live up + to its promises—the disciples of the great past will + always be few. But since no age can walk entirely by + its lone, there will always be a loyal band who will spend + the best portions of their lives in the great backward and + abysm of time, and will with shining faces bring good + tidings to their fellowmen. How grateful the early Nineteenth + Century should have been to Lamb for his specimens + of the well-nigh forgotten Elizabethan Dramatists; + how grateful we should be to Mr. Gilbert Murray for + pointing out to us once more the splendors of Athenian + <a class="pagenum" id="page64" title="64"> </a>Tragedy! Upon scholars like these we must rely that + too much is not forgotten.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">The saying that the greater the fame the fewer the + readers, is a random shot, and yet it hits the target, and + not the outermost ring. Every approving reader gained + for a work hands on the word to a dozen who have not + read, nor will ever read it. Fame enlarges its sweep + through time like the surge thrown off the prow of a + moving steamship, broadening over the sea until it + stretches beyond all apparent relation to the ship which + first stirred it up. But here the figure breaks: for while + in most cases the waves subside, in others, the commotion + bids fair to last to the end of human history.</p> + + <p>The classic once established becomes so sacred to the + unthinking public that to doubt it is <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">lèse majesté</em>; at least, + its fame produces a sort of hypnotism. No one, for instance, + can approach a play of Shakespeare for the first + time unbiassed. He may be actually bored, but he will + not admit it. Perhaps he will make himself believe that + he enjoys it, but he will not be found with it in his hours + of honest play. He hardly dares know what he thinks, + lest he should be found heretical, and he feels safer to + swell the lusty chorus of praise. The most influential + critics in such a case get no real hearing. They may + capture a few individual opinions, but the public at large + will lend no ear to qualifications. Only if repetition is + carried to the point of damnable iteration, will modification + of appraisal begin slowly to sink down through class + after class; it takes an unconscionable time to reach the + bottom, perhaps centuries. One recalls lesser literature + still lingering moribund upon front parlor tables in village + homes—Thomson’s <cite>Seasons</cite> or, perhaps, Young’s <cite>Night + Thoughts</cite>. No one reads them; they remain as closely + shut as the parlor doors; but there they lie, the cherished + signs of family respectability, and still accepted unquestioningly + as living things.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page65" title="65"> </a>Literary fame is a slippery and indefinite thing. There + are countless impossible questions one could ask. How + many readers must a work have to be considered alive + at all? Is fame to be allowed to some of the obscure poets + like Campion, Traherne, and Shenstone, who are known + only to the specialist? Definiteness and finality are as difficult + of attainment as to tell a hawk from a handsaw when + the wind is northerly. But it is certain that the immortals + are dependent upon an amazingly small set of followers, + which tends to grow smaller as the ages turn. Yet those + who deserve long life will in the long run reach an old + age, frosty but kindly. And we may leave them with + confidence in the hands of Time, who, after all, like + Autolycus, pockets only what have come to be unconsidered + trifles.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_6"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page66" title="66"> </a>CARLYLE AND KULTUR</h2> + + <h3>I</h3> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">The</span> opinions anyone holds in this momentous crisis + are largely determined by those he has imbibed + from the thinkers of the past, and it is interesting to notice + how much Carlyle has been brought into the discussion + on both sides. A somewhat systematic consideration of + the bearing of his teachings on the present war may + therefore not be altogether profitless.</p> + + <p>For many reasons he is not the sort of man to invite + much attention from journalistic, academic, and dilettante + writers. He is unpopular in a double sense; for he + is neither superficial nor facile, and his ideas are opposed + to the optimistic convictions that dominate in this generation. + Some insist that he is responsible for the extravagant + paradox and persistent denial of the obvious + and the accepted indulged in so freely by such journalistic + products as Shaw and Chesterton, but these men only + imitate his manner to pervert his meaning. That they + imitate him, however, is proof of his influence; for the + popular writer does not imitate anyone whose repute is + not of the highest.</p> + + <p>The academic mind is indifferent or hostile to him because + the formlessness of his writings and their abnormal + character seem serious defects to those to whom the + formal is more important than the substantial. His + learning, too, while undoubtedly extensive, is not always + accurate or orthodox. The king is not the “cunning or + the kenning” man, and his contempt for “logic-choppers” + and “word-mongers” does not commend him to such as + value the theoretical above the practical.</p> + + <p>To the dilettante he is equally repellant. He hated + mediocrity and superficiality, and he had inconveniently + high standards. This latter reason is the openly avowed + <a class="pagenum" id="page67" title="67"> </a>one for hostility towards him in the case of an English + writer, Mr. Ford Madox Hueffer, who freely denounces + him in his diffuse discussions of the war, but also cites + facts that tend to disprove his contention that Carlyle + is without influence; for he tells of repeated experiences + with British workingmen who were readers of Carlyle + and ardent believers in his gospel.</p> + + <p>Carlyle is undoubtedly a strong influence in Great + Britain. The superficial regard him as a reactionary + and an obscurantist who believed in despotism and serfdom, + but those who live closer to the realities of life detect + in his writings a passionate sympathy for the humble + and the oppressed. He may not exert much influence in + the learned or the artistic world, but he is certainly a + social and a political force. Writers on British politics + constantly refer to his influence over the more intelligent + voters of the working classes, and this demonstrates + power of the most pregnant kind.</p> + + <p>Outside of Great Britain, too, there are evidences of + his influence. It is mostly within the English speaking + world, but some accuse him of being the progenitor of + Nietzsche and his cult of the superman. This is only + superficially true, however, for Nietzsche was exactly + the sort of person he denounced as “quack” and “simulacrum;” + but, as in the case of Shaw and Chesterton, + this proves influence, even though it be of a negative + sort. In the United States his <cite>French Revolution</cite> has + apparently had much influence in the way of making + our attitude towards the past less formal and academic, + and in bringing about a tendency to look more at the + principles than at the facts of history. He has also given + us such familiar expressions as “captains of industry,” + the “unspeakable Turk,” and many others not generally + recognized as his; and the man who fashions our daily + speech gives the strongest possible proof of influence. + Here, too, however, his influence is chiefly in the political + and social world, and we can see the effect of his ideas in + <a class="pagenum" id="page68" title="68"> </a>one of our most important pieces of recent legislation, the + selective draft; for this act aims to realize his cardinal + principle, that the necessary work of a nation shall be + compulsory and shall be apportioned equitably and in + such a way as to ensure each man getting the task for + which he is fitted.</p> + + <h3>II</h3> + + <p>The chief question about Carlyle at present, however, + is not the extent of his influence, but how far his teachings + justify the theories and practices now dominant in Germany. + The Germans point to his advocacy of their cause + in 1870, and to his glorification of Frederick the Great, + as proofs that he would approve of, and even exalt, all + that they have done. The kaiser has quoted him in a + widely discussed speech about “one man with God being + a majority,” while less prominent Germans have freely + appealed to his authority. The English speaking world + has seemed, on the whole, disposed to admit that Carlyle’s + doctrines justify, or at least tend to produce, ideas + such as those that now obsess Germany. Some writers, + like the Mr. Hueffer already mentioned, have seized the + opportunity to belabor his memory as a traitor; while + others have risen up to defend him, although they seem + to do so less from conviction than a desire to deprive the + Germans of support. Anyone who knows Carlyle more + than superficially, however, knows that the present German + policy would earn from him nothing but furious + denunciation; and the reason would not be because the + Germans began the war, as D. A. Wilson argues in <cite>The + Fortnightly Review</cite> for February, 1916, nor because he + was pro-Russian, nor because of any other personal prejudice + or predilection, but because the German nation today + exhibits about all the vices he inveighed against as + most dangerous to the peace of the world and the progress + of civilization.</p> + + <p>It would be idle to deny that Carlyle did exalt the + <a class="pagenum" id="page69" title="69"> </a>German nation and German policies to the English-speaking + world, but we shall have to qualify this exaltation + if we accept Dr. Johnson’s principle that an author’s + works need editing a generation or so after their composition. + This dictum is based on the obvious necessity + of recognizing that the force of what a man says is conditioned + by the current opinion of his time and by his + attitude towards it, and it also recognizes the truth of + one of Carlyle’s own observations: “It is man’s nature + to change his dialect from century to century; he cannot + help it though he would.” The dialect of the nineteenth + century was not that of the twentieth, and Carlyle’s use + of it was affected by several things that still further obscure + his meaning for us. He opposed strongly what + he regarded as many popular fallacies of his time, and + in opposing them he overemphasized things that seemed + to him to discredit or to disprove them. To the undisciplined + British populace, impatient of all control and + clamoring for the removal of all restrictions on individual + liberty, he extolled the docile German people; but it was + not their absolute so much as their comparative virtue + that he was praising, and he would have recognized that, + under other circumstances, their submissiveness could + prove a vice, as, indeed, it has. Another fact, pointed + out by Colonel T. W. Higginson, a man whose extreme + humanitarianism was calculated to make him unsympathetic + towards the eulogist of Dr. Francia, is that + Carlyle was a humorist and a man to whom the humorous + attitude was second nature. It will be necessary, therefore, + to discount his praise of the German people and of + German institutions, for two reasons; the first, because + it was heightened to serve as a corrective to the tendency + towards license in his countrymen; and the second, because, + as a humorist, and also because of his ardent temperament, + he invariably indulged in over-statement.</p> + + <p>There is much besides this to indicate that Carlyle’s + praise of Germany in the eighteenth and early nineteenth + <a class="pagenum" id="page70" title="70"> </a>centuries is anything but evidence that he would endorse + Kultur and Schrecklichkeit. His fundamental teaching + is that we must not be formal, rigidly logical, or addicted + to any fixed method of thinking. The nature of things + must be determined from their effects, and not from any + external characteristics. The national attributes of any + people are not permanent, but they are capable of wide + variation, and much of his invective and striking metaphor + was poured forth in an effort to prove that this + variation is very largely a question of good or bad leadership. + In sustaining this thesis he traces the history of + Germany more completely than he does that of any other + country; and he indicates several periods, notably that + of the Thirty Years’ War, and the reign of Frederick I, + when Prussia, at least, was contemptible in its policies. + France, too, he argues, has not always been the mischief-maker + of Europe; for to him the French Revolution was + a salutary outburst of the native integrity of the French + people, to sweep away the intolerable hypocrisies and + injustices of the Old Regime, and to improve not only + French, but human society as well.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">It is plain, therefore, that he did not affirm the Germans + to be intrinsically good and the French intrinsically + bad. His aim was to show that nations rise in proportion + to the extent to which their purposes are just and their + methods intelligent, and that they invariably fall if they + deal unjustly with their own citizens or their neighbors. + Sometimes he contrasted the French unfavorably with + the Germans, as, for instance, when he says that the + martial ardor of the French may be compared to blazing + straw, while that of the Germans is more like the burning + of anthracite coal. This, however, is due to his having, + like a great many other people, an impression that the + French are more likely to exhibit superficial and glittering + qualities, while the Germans are conspicuous for the + commonplace virtues of industry and thoroughness. + <a class="pagenum" id="page71" title="71"> </a>Nothing was more insidious, in his opinion, than to prefer + brilliancy to solid worth; and it was the danger of this + preference he was emphasizing, more than the native + depravity of the French national character, when he + compared the Gallic temperament unfavorably with the + Teutonic.</p> + + <h3>III</h3> + + <p>His attitude towards efficiency was also the direct opposite + of the present German conception of it. To him + efficiency was a matter of adaptation and improvisation, + while the German theory is that it is a question of fixed + method and elaborate mechanism. Nobody ever despised + more than Carlyle the perennial fallacy that things + can be done better by the hocus pocus of procedure than + by the intelligent application of the available means to + the end desired. He censured any effort to achieve things + automatically. He was never tired of ridiculing trust + in formulas. He insisted that the intelligence must be + unfettered by preconceptions or by a rigid plan. His + hero was a man who had “swallowed all the formulas,” + and who proceeded to adapt means to ends in any way + that was effective, passing rough-shod over theory, convention, + dogmas, or any other restrictions on his freedom + of action. It is true that he did insist on the necessity + of having accurate and comprehensive knowledge, and + on thoroughness and other essentials of what the Germans + regard as scientific procedure. These things, however, + were to him not major but minor virtues. They + were the auxiliaries to success, but they were never to be + considered as sufficient to ensure success, for they had + always to be supplemented by intelligence and insight. + This is shown by his depreciation of mere “beaver” industry, + and by his fondness for satirizing “pipe-clay,” + by which he meant senseless military routine. No crime, + in his eyes, was worse than a failure to recognize the + dominant importance of the sensibly and intellectually + <a class="pagenum" id="page72" title="72"> </a>imponderable and intangible elements that are part of + every human problem; so that he reprehended as vices + the very things that have been most characteristic of + the Germans during the present war.</p> + + <p>Another thing that Carlyle abused and the Germans + display, is insincerity. Nothing comes in for more invective + from him than this, and to him it meant primarily + a subjective attitude. Vanity was its chief cause, in his + opinion. Truth, however unpalatable, must be recognized; + while fiction, however flattering, must be scorned. + Personal relationships must not sway our judgment, + and he railed with especial violence against unwarranted + optimism inspired by conceit. He pointed out, as one of + Frederick the Great’s chief virtues, the fact that he was + influenced by no delusions created by vanity or sentimentality. + He says Frederick looked facts squarely in + the face, and instances his once offending his brother, + the Crown Prince, by telling him that he had surrounded + himself with flatterers, and reminding him that the Austrians, + his enemies in the field, would not flatter him. + Carlyle also points out that Frederick’s wars were all conducted + on a frank basis, so far, at least, as acknowledgment + to himself of the real situation was concerned. There + was no indulgence in the theatrical or the spectacular, + certainly in none that deceived only himself. Frederick + wasted no energy in striving for apparent triumphs that + had no practical worth. He disregarded purely political + or sentimental influences. Berlin was twice entered by + the enemy during the Seven Years War, because Frederick + never paid a military price for a political or a temporary + victory, but he yielded territory whenever strategy demanded + it. How different is this from Germany’s present + military policy, which sacrifices permanent advantages + for the appearance of victory, and does not succeed in + achieving even a convincing appearance of that? It is + plain that the cheap posturing of the German military + policy is just the sort of thing Carlyle hated and despised, + <a class="pagenum" id="page73" title="73"> </a>and nobody who has read him more than casually can + have escaped realizing that his insistence on the necessity + of recognizing fact in an honest and unbiased manner + is a condemnation of the delight in conscious and unconscious + mendacity displayed by the present German + government.</p> + + <p>Stupidity he warned against as one of the chief implements + of the devil. There is no other crime, he often said, + for morality is largely a matter of intelligence. Better + be a villain than a fool, he implies, by quoting approvingly + the boast of the Scotch family that it had produced “many + a blackguard but not one blockhead.” The mind which + cannot or will not perceive the obvious, or which persists + in denying the unflattering, is not only hopeless but + vicious. Preferring to credit their prejudices or their + desires, instead of the lesson of events, was the chief + crime he ascribed to the men he held responsible for the + worst catastrophes of history. For mere density and + well-intentioned incompetence, as in the case of Louis + XVI, he had some pity; but for stupidity arising from + wanton obstinacy and arrogance he had nothing but + wrath and scorn. It would be difficult to find in history + a parallel for the infatuated folly of the German military + and political policy during this war, but we find Carlyle + reprehending less aggravated and perverse displays of + trust in bombast, brutality, and pretension, in the case + of countries like Spain and Austria; and this is only one + of many things that show how monstrous in his eyes + would seem the insensate policy which has made Germany + the shame of civilization, and has alienated from + her every country in the world except a few contiguous + ones that tolerate or assist her through fear or rapacity.</p> + + <p>What proves the German policy most at variance with + Carlyle’s philosophy, however, is the fact that it is guided + by materialistic and cynical convictions. His basic belief + was that the fundamental law of existence is morality; + they jeer at any power that is not material. Besides this, + <a class="pagenum" id="page74" title="74"> </a>he believed that reliance on the baser qualities of human + nature can never lead anywhere but to perdition. The + leadership which aims to secure itself by appealing to + the selfishness or by satisfying the folly of mankind, is + courting disaster. The German policy boastfully proceeds + on the assumption that the only motives that + govern human action are self interest of some base sort, + and it credits humanity with as little intelligence as + morality. It is true that Carlyle had slight respect for + the intelligence or the integrity of the masses, but he + insisted that nobility is inherent in human nature, and + that a hero who knows how to arouse it, invariably appears + whenever a government becomes so unjust or so + incompetent as to be intolerable. The German theory + is that the weak have no friends; Carlyle’s conviction + was that nature avenges all injustice. The Germans + declare that might makes right; Carlyle preached that + right makes might, and on every question of fundamental + morality he was diametrically opposed to them. “Savage + animalism is nothing; inventive spiritualism is all,” he + writes in one place, and implies in a thousand. The + Germans proceed on exactly the opposite assumption. + They trust in nothing but force, and the neo-Darwinism + that guides their policy is only a combination of the ideas + he denounced in the works of such men as Hume, Bentham, + Comte, and Darwin himself, mixed with a sentimental + egoism that he abominated above everything + else.</p> + + <h3>IV</h3> + + <p>There is, of course, some reason for believing that + Carlyle’s ideas resemble those of which the German + policy is the expression, but there is none if we look beyond + his superficial meaning. One reason for branding + him as an advocate of German practices is his exaltation + of Frederick the Great. Frederick began his first + war by seizing Silesia, very much as Wilhelm II began + <a class="pagenum" id="page75" title="75"> </a>the present war by seizing Belgium. As Carlyle justified + the seizing of Silesia, many people cannot see why that + does not warrant the conclusion that he would also justify + the seizure of Belgium. Such people, however, forget + that the Prussia of 1740 was not even the Prussia of 1914, + to say nothing of the German Empire or the Teutonic + Alliance. Carlyle would detect in Prussia a change in + spirit, but even if this cannot be established, there is + certainly no parallel between Frederick’s seizure of Silesia + and Germany’s attack on Belgium. In 1740, Prussia + was one of the small countries of Europe. Its population + was about half that of Belgium in 1914, and its political + importance was not much greater. It was situated between + militaristic France and imperialistic Austria; and + its immediate neighbors: Saxony, Bavaria, Poland, and + the Scandinavian kingdoms, were ready at any moment + to profit by its misfortunes. Prussia’s seizure of Silesia + was, therefore, very much as if Belgium, learning in advance + of Germany’s plan of invasion, had seized German + territory adjacent to its frontiers, and used it as a buffer + to defend itself. It was the case of a small state preserving + itself from the aggressions of a big neighbor aiming + at world dominion. The methods employed may + not have been technically legal, but they were justified; + therefore Carlyle endorsed them. He believed + that Frederick, cynic and materialist though he admits + him to have been, nevertheless proved himself the + valiant defender of his country’s right to self government. + He also regarded Frederick as the man who did + most in the eighteenth century to preserve Europe from + being dominated by a lawless imperialism. The rulers + of Austria, because of their almost uninterrupted possession + of the office of Holy Roman Emperor, openly + aimed at universal dominion, and never lost an opportunity + of trying to realize it by force of intrigue. France, + too, was striving for the domination of Europe, and + Russia was just becoming conspicuous for the brutality + <a class="pagenum" id="page76" title="76"> </a>and unscrupulousness of its political methods quite as + much as for the vastness of the power it had suddenly + developed. When these facts are considered, Frederick’s + action must be admitted to have been, if not in the interests + of democracy, at least in support of the principle of + self-determination for which the Allies claim to be fighting + against Germany; and Carlyle’s endorsement of it at + least creates the presumption that he would not sympathize + with Germany, which today, greatly extended, is + playing the part of the bullying nations he commended + Frederick for thwarting.</p> + + <p>He seems, however, to advocate autocracy, and to + deride democracy, and this would appear to put him in + agreement with the kaiser and his professorial prompters. + It is true that he did deride the notion that the decision + of the majority is always right. He likewise insisted + that all the constitutionality and legality conceivable + will not ensure good government or justify incompetence + or unrighteousness in power; and that, conversely, no + formal or technical irregularity disqualifies a government + which is beneficent and capable. He ridiculed the idea + that political equality is synonymous with justice, but + this does not mean that he believed in caste rule. His + opposition to political equality was inspired by no respect + for inherited authority or the sanctity of property, + but was the result of a conviction that it is a crude and + materialistic way of trying to solve an immensely complicated + problem by a simple mechanical process. Not + external equality, but <em>equity</em>, must be achieved to make + government effective and successful, was his contention. + Making men equal in political power, in his opinion, ensured + that the government would be dominated by the + ignorance and selfishness of the mass of men, rather than + by the enlightenment and integrity of the relatively + small portion of mankind whom nature fits for leadership + by endowing them with superior moral and intellectual + powers. He believed no man entitled to authority except + <a class="pagenum" id="page77" title="77"> </a>on the basis of character and ability, and he was as bitterly + opposed to the German scheme of class rule as he was + to the quantitative methods of the radicals. It is entirely + wrong to think that, because he denied that universal + suffrage will guarantee justice and humanity, he + endorsed injustice and oppression. He didn’t care how a + government was organized or what it claimed to do, but + he only inquired what it had succeeded in doing, and + by this he judged it. The results of the German policy + have been disaster for the world as well as for Germany, + and he would condemn the German government for this, + without being at all concerned about its form. He attached + no importance to a government’s form; all he + judged by was its spirit. He believed that a government + is inevitably the expression of the intelligence and morality + of the people it represents, and that any form is capable + of proving either good or bad in operation. Germany + may be an autocracy in form, but the German people + almost unanimously endorsed the war and its enormities; + so what we have is an exhibition of the fallibility of popular + judgment more than a display of the evils of autocracy. + On this point Carlyle’s position is clear, while + that of the critics who accuse him of having endorsed + German practices, because he denied that the majority + is always right, is much more susceptible of being considered + a justification of Kultur.</p> + + <p>According to his interpretation of history, the case of + Germany is perfectly plain. It is simply an instance + of the degeneracy that, he claimed, inevitably follows + the adoption of selfish or materialistic ambitions. The + patient industry and the steady pursuit of the practical + instead of the spectacular brought Germany to greatness, + and placed vast power in the hands of her rulers. Then + those rulers were tempted to misuse that power, and + they fell. They decided to corrupt the people and make + them the instrument by which world dominion could be + achieved. They therefore cultivated the baser passions + <a class="pagenum" id="page78" title="78"> </a>of the populace, and with infinite thoroughness and resource, + they used every agency of the government to + secure public endorsement for a policy of aggression, and + for a swash-buckling and bombastic procedure that appealed + only to the shallow and the reckless. They found + this the easier because circumstances worked with them. + The Franco-Prussian War inflamed German chauvinism + and inflated German conceit to an incredible extent. + The success of the war was more the result of France’s + weakness than Germany’s strength, but it filled the German + nation with extravagant enthusiasm, and inspired + it with blind faith in its own invincibility. Then Germany + changed from a country largely agricultural to one + mainly industrial, and wealth came to kindle in a naturally + gross and sensual people a passion for luxury, and to impart + to a naturally arrogant one the insolence of material + power. The effect of the first of these things is shown + in the famous night-life of Berlin, which, before the war, + was more gross and lavish than that of any other city + in the world; while the overbearing character of the + average German abroad shows how general was the influence + of the second. Thus a change has been effected + in the spirit of Germany. From a nation dull but honest, + rude but sincere and kindly, it has been transformed by + bad leadership and sudden prosperity into a people whose + dominant characteristics are brutality and mendacity. + Therefore the Germany that Carlyle praised is not the + Germany that perpetrated the present war, and there is + no doubt that his attitude towards the apostles of Kultur + would be the direct opposite of what it was towards Frederick + the Great and Bismarck.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_7"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page79" title="79"> </a>THE FREEDOM OF THE SEAS</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">It</span> need not be difficult either to define or to secure the + freedom of the seas if the governments of the world + sincerely desire to come to an agreement concerning it.” + At first thought, the most striking characteristic of these + words of President Wilson in his address to the Senate + last January is their optimism. Freedom of the seas, + according to German authorities, is to be secured by + various agencies, including the unrestricted use of the + submarine and an independent Ireland. Primarily it is + to be secured by the destruction of British naval predominance. + Now British authorities have an inconvenient + habit of stating that freedom of the seas was won + long ago by means of the British navy, that it exists today + in time of peace, and that its continuance depends upon + Britannia ruling the waves. Our correspondence with + Germany before we entered the war contains polite references + to our coöperation with that country to secure + freedom of the seas through recognition by treaties and + international agreement of principles such as that of the + immunity of private property, not contraband, from capture + at sea. But Germany no longer thinks it possible to + secure the freedom of the seas by the medium of scraps + of paper, and other nations show an unflattering unanimity + on this point, with regard to any scraps of paper to + which the present German government might be a party. + As to the submarine as a means of securing freedom of + the seas, our entrance into the war is perhaps a sufficient + indication of our estimate of it. The usefulness of an + independent Ireland toward this end would seem even + more likely to be limited. There remains the British + navy, and it promises to remain.</p> + + <p>And how are we to define the freedom of the seas? The + term has been used in the past, and examination of our + <a class="pagenum" id="page80" title="80"> </a>diplomatic correspondence will show that it has been used + in this war, in three different ways. It has been used in + protest against the appropriation by a single nation of + definite areas of the high seas for exclusive uses. The + sowing of mines and the proclamation of danger areas + have led to its revival in this sense. It has been believed + to mean the right of private citizens to continue sea-borne + commerce in war time with a minimum of interruption. + Our preoccupation with this usage of the term during the + first years of the war won us a good deal of unpopularity + with our present co-belligerents. It has been used with + reference to the safety of human life on the sea. We are + fighting Germany today upon this issue.</p> + + <p>Is the problem one of war times only, or is there anything + in the contention that the potential pressure of sea + power operates in times of peace in restraint of commercial + development? The question is not a simple one, and + perhaps it will aid us in understanding the seeming optimism + of our historian-president if we try to understand + how this matter has been dealt with in the past. The + sailing ship has given way to the turbine propeller, the + galleon to the dreadnaught, the pinnace to the submarine, + but is the freedom of the seas which is being fought for to-day + of a kind different from that which was fought for in + the days of Drake? And is it to be secured by the same + or by different means?</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">We need not dwell upon the recognition by Roman law + of the principle of the right of all to use the seas as a + highway, nor upon the claims of various city-states, notably + Venice, to dominate portions of the Mediterranean. + In view of recent pronouncements from the Vatican, it is + interesting to remember that the claim of Venice, picturesquely + symbolized by the annual ceremony of wedding + the Adriatic, was based in part upon the gift of a ring + accompanying an alleged papal grant, and that the struggle + for the freedom of the ocean seas began as a challenge + <a class="pagenum" id="page81" title="81"> </a>of two actual papal grants of wider significance. In 1454 + Nicholas V rewarded the pertinacity of the Portuguese + in pushing their discoveries southward along the coast of + Africa, by granting to the crown of Portugal exclusive + rights of navigation and trade south of Capes Bojador + and Non. In 1493, Alexander VI rewarded the crown of + Castile for the exploit of Columbus, by giving Spain rights + similarly exclusive beyond the meridian one hundred + degrees west of the Azores. The details of these arrangements + were later modified by mutual agreement of the + powers concerned, the final understanding being that + Portugal had exclusive rights of trade and navigation by + the eastern approach to the Indies, and Spain in the + waters of what was supposed to be the western route + thither.</p> + + <p>Both powers stood ready to defend the privileges which + the highest international authority of the period had + granted them. They proceeded to deal summarily with + all foreign vessels found in their preserves. Although the + medieval maritime code, the <em lang="es" xml:lang="es">Consolato del Mare</em>, provided + for sparing the lives of the crew of a captured vessel, the + humanitarianism of the king of Portugal took a different + form. John II issued orders to his captains to seize all + vessels encountered in the barred zone, and instructed + them to cast the crews into the sea, “In order that they + may die a natural death.”</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">It was the mariners of France who most frequently + braved this earlier form of “spurlos versenkt.” They persisted + in navigating the waters claimed by Portugal, and + established a lucrative trade in Brazil. Their sovereign, + Francis I, seems to have been the earliest champion among + rulers of the freedom of the ocean seas. To the expostulations + of the king of Portugal he maintained, “The act + of traffic and exchange of goods is of all rights one of the + most natural and best grounded.” To the remonstrances + of the Spanish ruler, the Emperor Charles V, he replied, + <a class="pagenum" id="page82" title="82"> </a>“The sun shines for me as well as for others. I should + like to see the clause of Adam’s will which excludes me + from the partition of the world.” The tales of the exploits + of Jean Ango, merchant of Dieppe, who sank his + enormous fortune in his ventures; of his captains, Fleury, + Verrazano, the brothers Parmentier, is an absorbing one. + Seeking fortunes for themselves and revenge for comrades + fallen into the hands of the enemy and treated as pirates; + justifying their acts on the principle that the paths of the + sea are free to all; they dared and suffered, and explored + new lands, and brought glory to the maritime annals of + France. They laid the foundations of her overseas commerce + and colonies, but owing to the religious wars at + home the superstructure was not built until a later age.</p> + + <p>The exploits of the French sailors against the Spanish + monopoly were succeeded by those of Hawkins and Drake. + Elizabeth’s dictum that the sea and the air were common + to all was as emphatic as Francis I’s utterances on the + subject, and Elizabeth’s was the better maintained. The + victories of Drake in the Caribbean Sea in 1586 meant the + death blow to Spain’s hopes of effectually barring the + western seas. She was felt to be within her rights, however, + in establishing a monopoly of trade with her colonies + in the new world. The English, in their efforts to obtain + trading concessions, or at least a recognition of their right + to trade in regions not actually occupied by Spain, following + French precedent, sedulously avoided making any + agreement that might seem to acknowledge Spain’s right + to prevent the vessels of other nations from sailing the + American seas.</p> + + <p>While England was combating Spain’s claims in western + waters, a new maritime power, the Netherlands, was + breaking down the monopoly of Portugal in the east. The + ships of the Dutch East India Company won their way + against the Portuguese and made prize of their vessels. + It was apparently to set at rest the consciences of members + of the company who hesitated to pocket profits that + <a class="pagenum" id="page83" title="83"> </a>had not been won in peaceful trade, that the Dutchman + Grotius wrote his treatise on the law of prize, one chapter + of which, under the title <cite>Mare Liberum</cite>, was published + as an independent work. The book claimed the seas as + a free highway for the ships of all nations, and freedom + of trade for all nations on every sea. That age was not + ready to accept either claim in its entirety. Two Englishmen, + Welwod and Selden, wrote books to vindicate England’s + traditional sovereignty over the British seas, the + limits of which no one was quite certain about. Even the + British admirals who were supposed to defend British + authority there, could never get the Crown lawyers to + pronounce exactly on the point, some holding that British + seas extended to the English settlements in America, + others being satisfied with a line drawn from Norway to + Cape Finisterre. Charles I set out, with his ship money + fleets, to supplement the discourses of his subjects by “the + louder language of a powerful navy.” But it was left + for his great successor, Cromwell, to use this latter language + effectively, and to wring from the Dutch the concession + that their ships should strike flag and topsail in + the narrow seas. They always insisted, however, that + this was done in courtesy, not as a recognition of British + sovereignty over any part of the high seas. International + incidents arising from the refusal of French captains to + salute occurred until England relinquished her claim during + the Napoleonic wars.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">As to freedom of trade, the English Navigation Laws + stood as a witness that Spain’s policy of monopolizing + colonial trade was considered worthy of emulation. Such + monopolies were carefully guarded, as in Elizabeth’s day, + and as in her day efforts were made to break them down. + To Cromwell’s request that Englishmen be allowed liberty + of conscience and of trade in the West Indies, the Spanish + ambassador replied that it was to ask his master’s two + eyes. Thereupon Cromwell stopped asking, but despatched + <a class="pagenum" id="page84" title="84"> </a>a fleet to the West Indies to seize a post which + might become a centre of British trade.</p> + + <p>This action of Cromwell links his day to ours. That + the keynote of modern diplomacy and its accompaniment + of wars is to be found in rivalry for the possession of land + and markets in the extra-European world, has been fully + pointed out by historians. It is a fact which cannot be + emphasized too strongly. Its significance increases with + the study of the whole modern period.<span id="footnote1" class="fnmarker">*</span> + <span class="footnote">* And its illusions were set forth in “The Expansionist Fallacy,” No. 5 of this + <span class="special_name">Review</span>.—<span class="special_name">Ed.</span></span> + + One has only to + dip into the pamphlet literature of the eighteenth and late + seventeenth centuries, or to read a few pages of parliamentary + debates, to realize the importance of trade in + the eyes of all men. It becomes apparent that the aim + of each progressive nation was to increase its overseas + commerce at the expense of other nations, and that every + new enterprise of foreigners loomed as a menace to national + prosperity. Sea-borne trade was the nursery of + seamen, and commerce must be restricted to nationals + by navigation acts, while commercial ventures of rival + states were not alone a menace because they meant diverting + profits to the benefit of a rival, but dangerous as the + possible foundation for hostile naval power. Since commerce + was carried on most successfully by trading companies, + it was good policy to give them governmental + countenance, and although occasional voices were raised + in criticism of their monopolies and the high prices for + which they were felt to be responsible, their shares were + popular forms of investment, and many of their shareholders + sat in the seats of the mighty. The English and + Dutch East India Companies were among the first to + carry on overseas commerce on a large scale, and much + international history is written between the lines of their + annals.</p> + + <p>“And you, Belgians, courage, courage! Continue to + defend intrepidly your rights and your freedom, and with + <a class="pagenum" id="page85" title="85"> </a>them the freedom of the human race!” It was not in + August of 1914 that these words were spoken. They occur + in a pamphlet published in 1727, and the struggle in which + they urge the Belgians to persist was a struggle for the + freedom of the seas. The ruler of the Belgians in those + days was popularly called the German emperor, and + though not a Hohenzollern, he was a Hapsburg. The + Emperor Charles VI was pursuing a project which bade + fair to give the Hapsburg lands something they have not + attained to this day: importance as a maritime power. + He had issued a charter to a group of Belgian merchants + who were already carrying on a lucrative trade with the + far east from the port of Ostend. The Dutch and English + East India companies, seeing their monopolies endangered, + complained to their respective governments, which + immediately set in motion machinery for the suppression + of the Ostend Company. Diplomatic agents busied themselves + at Charles’ court, and a flood of pamphlets, in those + days of limited newspaper publicity, did what they could + in the manufacturing of public opinion. The Belgian + pamphlets maintained the principle that “the right to + trade in any part of the globe is inherent in all sovereign + peoples.” The Dutch pamphlets opposed the company + on the ground of alleged infringement of treaty rights + and agreements. The English pamphlets, wisely refraining + from much comment on documents based on papal + grants whose authority England had never recognized, + argued that English pocketbooks would suffer if the Ostend + Company continued to do business. Pitt many years + later stated in Parliament that the English government + had no right to demand the suppression of the company. + But, as the British ambassador said to the Emperor, in + language strikingly reminiscent of that of the Spanish ambassador + of Cromwell’s day, “In attacking our commerce, + you fly in the eyes of the English nation.” In the complicated + diplomacy of five years, the question of the Ostend + Company held its own, but in 1731 Charles VI abandoned + <a class="pagenum" id="page86" title="86"> </a>it, as he had abandoned many other things of value, to + obtain one more ratification of the Pragmatic Sanction.</p> + + <p>Eight years later it was England that was carrying on + a struggle for the principle of freedom of the seas. Modern + research has established beyond any reasonable doubt + that the immortal Jenkins did actually have an ear sliced + off by a Spaniard who was searching his ship for smuggled + goods, and that the tale was not a fabrication of the + Opposition that desired to force Walpole to plunge England + into war. The Opposition certainly recognized the + recruiting value of the incident. “The tale of Jenkins’ + ear will raise us troops enough!” exclaimed one member + on the floor of the House of Commons. Whether or not + Jenkins commended his soul to God and his cause to his + country, his country embraced his cause as that of the + freedom of British commerce from search by Spaniards + in time of peace. The British vessels searched were usually + smugglers, but the British public was not interested + in the right of Spain to safeguard her monopoly of trade + with her colonies; they objected to search and to the + contention that British ships must not be found in American + waters outside the straight path between England + and her colonies, and they besieged the doors of Parliament + with the slogan: “A free sea or war!” And so was fought + the war of Jenkins’ Ear, which might have been avoided + had it not been for the powerful influence, both with the + people and with Parliament, of the South Sea Company; + and which did nothing toward settling the point in controversy.</p> + + <p>Thus far the principle of freedom of the seas had been + invoked in connection with efforts to preserve for the + benefit of a whole nation or of favored groups of nationals, + all access to the trade and resources of certain regions. + During the wars for colonies and commerce which arose + from these efforts, the principle was brought forward + against interruption of commerce in time of war. In the + days when privateering was a recognized adjunct of maritime, + <a class="pagenum" id="page87" title="87"> </a>warfare, commerce-destroying was reduced to a + science that only the last three years have rivalled. The + seizure as contraband of anything which might help the + enemy to prolong the struggle, and the confiscation of + cargoes of neutral ships, on the ground that part of the + cargo belonged to the enemy, caused endless international + complications. Treaties of peace began to contain provisions + designed to render less burdensome these rights + claimed by belligerents. The first step toward anything + like international agreement was taken in the treaties of + Utrecht in 1713. By these treaties contraband was limited + to articles directly useful in war, exclusive of foodstuffs; + enemy goods on neutral ships were protected on + the principle later reduced to a formula, as “free ships, + free goods”; and the method of visit and search was regulated. + These arrangements did not outlast the peace, + but many later treaties renewed, and some developed + more fully, these restrictions, which were naturally more + popular with neutral powers and with powers possessing + small navies, than with the power which possessed the + command of the sea. As that enviable position was held + practically without interruption by Great Britain, and as + in time of war she used unsparingly the advantages her + position gave her, she gained in the eyes of opponent and + neutral the reputation of being the enemy of freedom of + the seas.</p> + + <p>At the beginning of the Seven Years’ War France, realizing + that she would not be able to control the trade with + her colonies, threw it open to neutrals. Great Britain + thereupon laid down her famous “Rule of 1756” that + commerce illegal in time of peace was not legal in time + of war, and attacked neutral ships found trading with + French colonies. The answer of Denmark and Sweden + to this policy was the formation of the first league of neutrals + to protect neutral commerce. The French, hoping + that the contrast of their policy with that of Great Britain + would help their cause with neutral powers, were careful + <a class="pagenum" id="page88" title="88"> </a>not to authorize interference with neutral trade. It is + interesting to find the doctrine of which we have heard + so much of late, of the menace of British “navalism,” + formulated in the eighteenth century by the minister of + a state which, like England’s opponent in the twentieth, + was stronger on land than on the sea. It was a French + diplomat who expressed the hope that some day a union + of nations would be able to cope with England and “establish + firmly after the peace, or even during the war, a + balance of commerce: for without it no other people will + ever enjoy any but a precarious navigation, which will + last only as long as it is to the interest of the English + government not to destroy it.” This statement owes + its significance to the fact that it voiced the attitude of a + government which, under stress of circumstances, indeed, + and not because it saw a light, was departing from the + prevailing practice of mercantilism, the reservation for + nationals of the benefits of colonial trade.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">A British statesman has recently made the assertion + that the United States owes its existence to the struggle + for the freedom of the seas. He was referring to the + Elizabethan struggle against Spain’s policy of exclusion, + but is not the statement true also in another sense? In + so far as the restrictions laid upon the development of + the colonies by the trade and navigation laws contributed + in bringing about the American Revolution, that movement + was a protest against the mercantile system, under + which no freedom of the seas was possible.</p> + + <p>The United States early ranged herself, also, on the side + of the nations that championed freedom of the seas for + commerce in time of war. Her treaty with France regulated + the right of search, limited contraband to munitions + of war, and proclaimed the principle, “free ships, free + goods.” The treaty which Franklin later negotiated with + Prussia established American advocacy of the immunity + of private property from capture at sea. In the meantime, + <a class="pagenum" id="page89" title="89"> </a>Great Britain’s refusal to limit herself in any interference + with commerce which might hinder her victory over her + revolted colonies and France, gave umbrage to the + Scandinavian powers and to Russia, and in 1780 Catherine + II proclaimed the Armed Neutrality of the North. + To the principle of “free flag, free goods,” and the limitation + of contraband to actual munitions of war, the Armed + Neutrality joined the principle that a blockade to be + binding must be effectively maintained. Although + Catherine jested with the British ambassador about her + armed neutrality, calling it an armed nullity, she told + him that Russian trade and Russian ships were her children, + and that she was determined to protect them. + France had favored the formation of the Armed Neutrality, + and Louis XVI improved the occasion by explaining + that his only motive in participating in the war was + his attachment to the principle of the freedom of the seas.</p> + + <p>It is difficult for us today to preserve the proper attitude + of respect for the word of a king in this connection, but + it is not so difficult for us to understand what was the + real attitude of France. England had won from France + the greater part of her colonies, and with them a lucrative + commerce, and her remaining commerce was being crippled + by the war policy of the mistress of the seas. Behind + the England which refused to limit her power as a belligerent + by accepting a revision of maritime law, stood the + England which was the successful commercial rival of + France.</p> + + <p>The French Republic inherited this much of the view + point of Louis XVI. The remedy for the situation + France saw in an imitation of England’s policy. It + enacted a navigation law copied after those of Great + Britain, and while declaring that its war against England + was a war to free the seas, it proclaimed that as a war + measure it was abandoning the principle, “free ships, + free goods.” Napoleon took up the convenient formula, + writing to the Royal Society on paper decorated by a + <a class="pagenum" id="page90" title="90"> </a>vignette representing Liberty sailing in a shell, and bearing + the motto, <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">Liberté de Mer</em>. Years later he read the + same meaning into the formula; outlining to Narbonne + his idea that England should be attacked through the + Orient; he said that the same blow which destroyed her + mercantile greatness in India, would win independence + for the west, and the freedom of the sea. England’s attitude + toward sea law gave him a convenient weapon, and + he induced his admirer the Czar to form a new Armed + Neutrality, announcing that France would not make + peace until neutral flags were properly respected, “and + until England shall have acknowledged that the sea belongs + to all nations.” Whether the device of a league of + neutrals could really be an effective force in protecting + commerce in wartime was not proved in 1800, for after + the assassination of the Czar Paul the coalition went to a + pieces. As in the present war, both belligerents used + their naval forces to cut off supplies from the territories + controlled by the enemy, and to ruin her commerce. + Napoleon in his attempt to close the markets of Europe + to Great Britain maintained that he was defending the + freedom of the seas against Great Britain’s refusal “to + recognize international law as observed by other nations,” + while England defended her “paper blockades” and + policy toward neutrals, as necessary, since she must preserve + her command of the seas as an “essential to the + protection of independent states, and for the prosperity + and good of the human race.”</p> + + <p>The damage done to American commerce in the pursuit + of these high-sounding aims precipitated the war of 1812, + which was indubitably a war for the freedom of the seas + for neutral commerce in time of war, and which would + probably have been fought with France instead of with + Great Britain had it not been for the question of impressment, + and the popular prejudices which had survived + the American Revolution. Our championship of rules + limiting belligerent rights against sea borne commerce, + <a class="pagenum" id="page91" title="91"> </a>and our activities in the suppression of the Barbary + pirates, have led us into a rather complacent attitude + with regard to our position as to freedom of the seas. + It is salutary therefore for us to remember the Bering + Sea controversy. When, in 1821, Russia claimed sovereignty + over Bering Sea, both the United States and Great + Britain protested, and Russia withdrew her claim. But + when in 1886 our activities in connection with pelagic + sealing caused friction with Great Britain, our defense + was based in part upon a claim to have inherited from + Russia rights which in 1821 we had refused to admit + that she possessed. And when the case was heard before + an international court, one of our advocates even justified + visit and search in time of peace, regardless of our traditional + position on that subject. However, after a certain + amount of journalistic jubilation when the award went + against us, our cousins overseas charitably allowed the + memory of our peccadillo to accumulate dust. That the + question of the right of a nation to protect fisheries in + adjacent waters is not a closed one, was shown by Russia’s + claim in the White Sea put forward in 1911. That question, + as well as the whole matter of the three-mile limit, + is bound to demand further consideration in the near + future.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">What has been the attitude of Great Britain since 1815, + and how far does it foreshadow her future policy? It + must not be forgotten that in the long struggle to safeguard + human life as well as property upon the seas, the + chief burden has been borne by her. In the old days of + her proud claim to a salute in the narrow seas, she felt + her responsibility to police those seas, and this sense of + responsibility has widened with the extension of her + commerce, so that she has put the whole world in her + debt by rendering the seven seas a safe highway in time + of peace. Her adoption of the principle of free trade was + probably the greatest single step that has been taken in + <a class="pagenum" id="page92" title="92"> </a>modern times toward freedom of the seas, in the sense + of breaking down the barriers of trade restriction which + supposed national interest had erected. On the other + hand, in the race for markets and raw materials, she has + not escaped the tendency toward that return to the mercantilistic + policy of exclusion in favor of nationals which + is so marked in the whole movement today, and which is + the crux of the problem. In the aspect of the question + which has to do with limitation of belligerent right, she + has shown herself responsive to the tendency, so noticeable + from 1815 to 1914, to regard war as something to be + limited so far as possible to the armed forces of the + belligerents. Her substantial concessions in 1856, many + of her statesmen have never ceased to deprecate, and it + was the growing feeling that she could not afford to part + with any more of the advantages her command of the + sea gave her, that prevented the ratification of the Declaration + of London. The events of the present war make + very vital the question how far rules of this sort contribute + toward the solution of the problem.</p> + + <p>The attitude of the English press toward Lord Lansdowne’s + suggestion that Great Britain declare her willingness + to discuss the problems connected with the freedom + of the seas reflects the shades of British opinion at present. + Certain papers see the problem as one of war times only, + and point out, what American opinion will not fail to + echo, that the submarine question will have to be dealt with + first and foremost. Two writers face the problem squarely + as one of commercial policy in time of peace, and offer + solutions according to their creeds. The <cite>Saturday Review</cite> + expresses the belief that “so far from examining with + other Powers the question of the freedom of the seas, we + must re-enact, without delay, the Navigation Laws, which + we foolishly repealed in 1849.” On the other hand, the + <cite>London Nation</cite> sees the impartial distribution of the + world’s raw materials as one aspect of the real freedom of + the seas, and agrees with the French Socialists that the + <a class="pagenum" id="page93" title="93"> </a>mistress of the seas that must secure this freedom for all + nations willing to live by the rule of peace, must be, not + Great Britain, but the future League of Nations. The + harmonizing of these two view-points does not promise + to be an easy task, and we may be sure that the whole + question will have full and free discussion in England + and throughout her empire in the months to come. + American citizens do not have to consider the problem of + resigning to the keeping of a League of Nations a proud + and long-cherished tradition of wardenship of the seas. + But we are one of the great commercial nations, and no + voice will have a more respectful hearing than ours at the + peace settlement. Barére, phrase-maker of the French + Revolution, summed up the foreign policy of France in + 1798 by saying that she had inscribed upon her flags, + “Freedom of the seas, peace to the world, equal rights to + all nations.” We have seen how the first of these phrases + has been used again and again in the past to cloak jealousies + of the commercial dominance of a rival nation. We + know that one thing that it means today is that never + again must the history of the world be stained by the + wanton destruction of the lives of peaceful travelers upon + the world’s highway. If it has a meaning also in relation + to the world’s commerce, in peace or in war, we must + see that it is a different meaning from that of the past. + For we, too, have inscribed <em>Freedom of the seas</em> upon our + battle flags, and it behooves us to be certain just where + our army belongs in the long procession of armies with + banners—just what is the direction in which our standards + point.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_8"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page94" title="94"> </a>THE CONDITIONS OF TOLERANCE</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">There</span> is one virtue which we implicitly assume + when we discuss philosophy, and usually invoke + when we venture to discuss religion. It is the favorite + “intellectual virtue” of our time: for, as the sophists disquietingly + remarked in their day, and as Professor Sumner + shows in <cite>Folkways</cite>, moral touchstones, like clothes, are + subject to change of fashion; those of a former generation, + taken for granted in all soberness, rise out of old books + with a quaintness like that of the “y<sup>e</sup>” and the long “ſ” + of our forefathers. The “great, the awful, the respectable + virtues,” such as godliness and righteousness, as terms of + approval, are seldom on our lips; the old stalwart, rigid + qualities are less admired today than those which are + more gracious and humane—than flexibility of mind, + universal sympathy, open vision.</p> + + <p>But these latter in their turn we have now accepted as + ideals, with no warning Socrates at our elbow to demand: + “Precisely what do you mean by these new standards + which you take for granted?”</p> + + <p>“Toleration is so prodigious an impiety,” said a member + of the Westminster Assembly, “that this religious + parliament cannot but abhor the meaning of it.” Yet, + in that constant gradual “transvaluation of all values” + which humanity performs, tolerance has become the + golden word of modern thought. And, like all popular + ideas, it is unthinkingly accepted and facilely claimed. + Even those who admit that they have not attained full + measure of it, hide themselves behind the remark: “I + am tolerant of everything except intolerance,” and thereby + yield them altogether: for to be tolerant only of a corresponding + tolerance, is like confining your courtesy to polite + people. The only attitude which tests the quality of + tolerance is precisely the intolerant attitude.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page95" title="95"> </a>But passing by these simple folk, we may yet find in + the more serious-minded the sense of an inconsistency in + the very conception, which puts it forever beyond our + reach. We may be undertaking the difficult experiment + of eating our cake and having it too. Yet even so there + may be a refuge: for if paradox should prove to be the + final form of truth—a union of opposites present in all + living facts—inconsistency will have no devastating + effect on it. The very fabric of truth may be woven of + just such contradictions; reality may <em>never</em> be consistent. + But whether or no this be the way out, there are plainly + difficulties to be considered, if we are to understand, and + at the same time accept, the ideal of tolerance.</p> + + <p>At the outset the distinction must be drawn between + outward physical toleration and the inward spiritual + grace of tolerance. In the first place, tolerance refers to + thought, not to conduct. That heretics are no longer + burned at the stake is the outcome of a change in social + policy; in so far as this change is more than the discovery + that heretics are after all not dangerous to the state, it is + due to the obvious fact that where there is no clearly + delineated, uniform orthodoxy, there can be no heresy—the + species is extinct. Whenever the government in power + concludes that an idea <em>is</em> dangerous to the state, it does + not hesitate to break through whatever safeguards to individual + liberty of opinion may have been erected in the + past. If such action is not legally justified, it is at once + shown that laws are dead things, powerless against living + human fears and needs. The application of the Defense-of-the-Realm + act in England to distributing copies of the + hitherto innocuous Sermon on the Mount, is evidence + enough that the governmental attitude towards the subject + has not changed in principle. And if, in addition to + fear, we have a sharply defined orthodox view, we find + that, though ordinary people no longer advocate capital + punishment for doubting the Trinity, they did attempt to + lynch Max Eastman for doubting the righteousness of + <a class="pagenum" id="page96" title="96"> </a>the war. In other words, we have ceased to believe that + religious opinions matter to social conduct, while still + believing that political opinions do.</p> + + <p>The genuine intolerance of the middle ages rested on a + different basis. We say: Think what you please, so long + as you act in conformity with what public opinion pleases. + Plenty of anarchists and pacifists and upholders of the + Susan B. Anthony Federal Amendment are still at large + because their actions, though not their thoughts, are orthodox. + The Inquisition struck deeper, because it was convinced + of the genuine importance of thought, in relation + to conduct. It was not content with binding the heretic + to hold his peace—he must recant. It was so utterly + convinced that not merely expediency, but final universal + truth, lay in its keeping, that mere error, in the face of + this revealed truth, became the ultimate sin.</p> + + <p>The question of the meaning of tolerance, then, if it is + not simply a matter of social usage, becomes the question, + How far is it compatible with conviction? Tolerance may + be defined as willingness to sanction the existence of views + at variance with our own. The point at issue is not the + expression of such views; the most intolerant man may + egg on his opponent to complete expression, that he may + argue him out of his error. The real tolerance refers to + the relation of thought to thought, not of thought to + speech. The above definition is one which, I believe, the + seeker after tolerance will agree to accept (I have tried it + on several). And yet, though presenting a fair idea of + the attitude, it holds within itself the difficulty which + puts the ideal out of reach.</p> + + <p>This inherent contradiction may be stated, in the terms + of our definition, thus: we are willing for an opposite view + to exist <em>only</em> when we are not entirely convinced that our + own view is true. The real belief in absolute truth is a + missionary state of mind, and carries with it the faith + that truth is the one thing worth having. In our day, + the infinite variety of ideas which custom does not stale, + <a class="pagenum" id="page97" title="97"> </a>has long forced itself upon our attention. In consequence + we no longer share the faith of Plato that knowledge, + as distinct from opinion, can be secured. We cannot + believe anything quite as firmly as the mediæval Catholic + believed in an eternal church independent of argument, + or indeed of humanity. If we could, we should be as intolerant + as Billy Sunday, whom “the pale cast of thought” + has never tinged, and, if we were metaphysicians, should + go up and down the world preaching the dangers of neo-realism, + as the evangelist fulminates against the blasphemy + of biological evolution. But Billy Sunday is an + inverted anachronism; it is not in the power of a modern + of the <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">commencement de siècle</em> to recapture his fine careless + rapture.</p> + + <p>If this be true, if we have grown too modest to declare + the eternal constitution of the universe, what degree of + conviction and what quality of tolerance are left us?</p> + + <p>The first answer is, that we may be willing to admit a + view differing from our own because we realize that both + may be right. But such a realization, if it is to be more + than verbal politeness, implies that the difference is only + partial or nominal, and consequently that my opponent’s + error does not shut him out from acknowledging my truth. + I may be a woman suffragist, and yet be tolerant of the + views of a friend who opposes suffrage, not on grounds of + sex, but because he believes that the suffrage is already too + wide, requiring restriction rather than enlargement. If I + also am in theory an aristocrat, I can admit the notion + that both of us are in a measure right.</p> + + <p>But the only real tests of tolerance are the far more + common cases, in which, if I am right, you must be wrong. + Present species are or are not the result of development + or special creation; the world is or is not an intelligible + order; our individual personalities do or do not survive + bodily death. We cannot be content here to fall back on + a different statement of the problem. When we say: “Oh, + yes, we both believe in God; to me he is Life Force; to + <a class="pagenum" id="page98" title="98"> </a>you, Jehovah,” we know in our hearts that we are simply + conniving at the draining of all definite meaning from the + word, in order to confuse the issue and keep the peace. + The one thing needful is, not that we should find blanket + terms under which we seem to agree, but that we should + drag our disagreement into the clearest possible light, and + so find out what we are talking about. Not only our language, + but our intelligence suffers from preferring vague + unity to distinct differentiation.</p> + + <p>Even in such cases there are, however, three conditions + which make tolerance tenable. The first of them is, that + we do not really care about the issue; we have taken sides, + but only because it is necessary to hold some opinion, and + so we have no active conviction. We are tolerant because, + after all, we know little about the subject, and are willing + to leave enthusiasm to experts. I have a friend who, + even in the crisis of the present war, keeps critically aloof + from questions of politics, seeming tolerant because his + own position is held only “academically”; he does not + care enough about the subject for that particular truth + to seem supremely important. He is tolerant with the + ease of indifference. It is easy to give free play to ideas + in which we have no compelling interest. In consequence, + many of us pretend to a general tolerance, when the fact + is, that we carefully choose our examples from among the + issues which least concern us.</p> + + <p>Much of the modern religious tolerance is of this type. + Our culture is so predominantly pagan that Christianity + has ceased to play more than a nominal part in our tests + of ideas and conduct. This tendency has infiltrated even + those who are unaware of the influence; the saving of + souls according to Christian theology has become less important + than the preservation of good taste, whose standards + are set by an unconsciously pagan public opinion. + On the other hand, the prevailing paganism has not become + self-conscious, since it is hidden behind Christian + words; and few have the time or courage to look beneath + <a class="pagenum" id="page99" title="99"> </a>words to test their consonance with things. Being the + result, not of directed effort, but of drifting, the pagan + element in our civilization is not eager to assert itself. + So the avowed pagans are tolerant of Christianity, saying: + “I do not care for it for myself, but it is good for the + masses. As to the church, for people who like that sort + of thing, why, that is the sort of thing they like.” And + the Christians are tolerant of pagan ideals of self-realization, + of personal pride and the worldly splendor of luxury + and art, on the ground that some of the ideals which they + are supposed to accept are after all inapplicable to modern + life. Since neither cares to assert itself for what it is, there + is the mutual tolerance of indifference. If these two ideals + dared to stand forth and contest the field, there would + be an end of tolerance,—a holy war, and clearing of + the atmosphere.</p> + + <p>The second condition of tolerance implies deeper + thought on the disputed subject than does the first. It + relates to things, about which we are not indifferent; but + it indicates a mental sophistication which is too cautious + lightly to put Q. E. D. at the close of a demonstration. + Our conviction has, as it were, a string to it. I read once + in a novel a phrase like this: “He was as amazed as a + Christian, who, waking after death, should look round + the universe and find that there was no God.” Imagination + gives us tolerance by marring every faith with the + suggestion that we may wake up and find ourselves mistaken. + And this is just the faith that cannot remove + mountains. The idea that the other fellow may be right, + paralyzes activity. Only bigots and fanatics set fire to + the world without scruple. We sit before the hearth, + perhaps, and argue about the brutality and cowardice of + much of our current morality, and the obstacles which + convention often raises against a sincere and heroic life; + and yet, unspoken behind our preaching, is the haunting + fear that the wisdom of the ages may not be the hoary + folly it seems, that the melodramatic novels may be true, + <a class="pagenum" id="page100" title="100"> </a>that considerations unguessed may be involved—and we + continue to sit before the hearth.</p> + + <p>The presence of the little imp of skeptical imagination + marks the difference between philosophical and religious + convictions. For good or ill, the other person’s point of + view, once seen, cannot cease for us. Our most ardent + idealism is not a belief for which we would willingly be + martyred by the realists: for we might wake and look + round the universe in vain for an Absolute. It may be + a good thing that the quality of religious conviction has + died out among us, or it may be a necessary evil of civilized + thinking. But the fact remains that we have no need of + tolerance towards views which, consciously or unconsciously, + we admit may be more nearly true than our own. + We are merely not sure enough of ourselves to risk annihilating + the views of our opponents.</p> + + <p>The third form of imperfect conviction on which tolerance + may rest is the view of truth as purely personal or + relative. Subjectivism has been used as a bad name in + philosophy for so long that the suspicion of it is usually + resented. But it peers out from behind the respectable + robe of many a philosophy which has not learned to call + hard names. To reduce truth to a fact in individual experience, + is to destroy the problem. Genuine conviction, + without which tolerance is a mere form devoid of substance, + is impossible if the truth for me and the truth for + you are isolated facts, having and needing no relation to + each other. But little private truths are sufficient only + for little private affairs.</p> + + <p>All of us want, and most of us take for granted, a real + beauty in whose light it is irrelevant that Longfellow is + read by a larger number of people than is Shelley. If I + really love Shelley, I must believe that in some impersonal + sense <cite>Prometheus Unbound</cite> is superior to <cite>The Psalm + of Life</cite>. This insistence upon a standard is at the root of all + our serious thinking; <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">de gustibus non disputandum</em> is a + foolish saying: for nothing as a matter of fact is more + <a class="pagenum" id="page101" title="101"> </a>fiercely disputed than questions of taste. The social + character of thought is so firmly rooted that a thought + which is limited to a personal impression ceases to interest + us. It has become a mere fact; and we live in a world + not of mere facts but of facts which gain their importance + only through meaning. It is only of the most trivial acts + that we say: This is right for me but wrong for you, because + you think it wrong. We do not really even then put + the You and the I on the same level, but imply that you + will, if properly educated, agree with me. Human nature + demands that we habitually will that the maxim of our + thought at least, should become a universal law. Only + when we apply our convictions, æsthetic, ethical, or + metaphysical, to others outside ourselves, do they become + more than fancies.</p> + + <p>If we go the whole way with Professor Sumner, for + example, in the relativity of morals, we are not really, + from the standpoint of modern Western teaching, looking + tolerantly upon other theories which approve, for instance, + the summary extermination of undesirable members of + the family. We are simply refusing to adopt the morality + of our own or any other age, more seriously than as a + guide of conduct whereby we avoid punishment by society. + The owning of slaves in the United States, says + Professor Sumner, is no longer expedient; but, under + changes of social and industrial conditions, it may again + become so. Morality, that is, is what its etymology implies—simply + custom.</p> + + <p>The holder of such a theory has no real conviction of + the position which, by geographical and temporal accidents, + he holds. He is really trying to place himself at + the center of indifference, and his one conviction is that + all standards are relative. Of opposition to this, he is + frequently intolerant enough. The man who holds that + Buddhism best meets the religious needs of India, as + Christianity satisfies the conditions of life in the West, + thinks himself tolerant of religious differences, because + <a class="pagenum" id="page102" title="102"> </a>all the examples are on his side; but he is intolerant—and + on his premises justly so—of missionaries, who are + his real opponents.</p> + + <p>Such are the forms of incomplete conviction which + make tolerance plausible. There remain those attitudes + which frankly abandon, for both sides, the claim to truth + in any absolute sense. Our opinions in any case, they + maintain, are but aspects of an all-embracing truth which + can be known only to a consciousness of the whole. Your + opinion and mine are, therefore, in the limited sense which + is alone applicable, equally true. But the only ideas + which we can admit to have an equal claim to partial + truth, are those which are not mutually exclusive, so + that the different facets of the universal truth shall not + interfere with one another. Unless we mean simply that + a variety of opinion makes the world less dull, in which + case conviction does not come in at all, we are unable to + admit that a belief diametrically opposed to our own is + “just as good,” not as a foil, or a spur, to our own thinking, + but in its own right. It may be that the Bradleyan + Absolute can admit contradictories as equally true, but + such mental acrobatics do not come naturally to human + thinking. Since we cannot view the world as the Absolute + sees it, we cannot, in practice, be guided by the theory + that opposite answers to living problems, set in all their + complex conditions, are equally true.</p> + + <p>The conviction that is softened by an historic sense or + by use of the terms of biological evolution, meets the + same difficulty. In so far as there is any real demand for + tolerance, it must be in the conflict of present issues. We + do not need to be tolerant of the past, unless we imagine + ourselves in that past, and regard its issues as, for the + time being, contemporary with us. Ideas opposing our + own may be gently dealt with, as necessary stages of + civilization. But if a stage is now no longer necessary, + the excuse fails. Cannibalism could not be defended as + a civilized practice, simply because it represents a stage + <a class="pagenum" id="page103" title="103"> </a>of development. Still less can we tolerate on the same + ground what seems to us wrong in modern life. For we + cannot without undue vanity maintain that the rest of + mankind living under our conditions are less highly developed + than we. So the sincere pacifist, for example, + cannot properly be tolerant of war as an expression of + prevailing savagery, beyond which he has himself advanced.</p> + + <p>The theory that opinions and institutions are justified as + “stepping-stones,” survivals not yet quite outworn, always + carries the presumption that we are the apex—an + assumption, of course, which evolutionary theory does + not bear out. It is possible that our seeming progress + may be retrogressive, that the true apex may have been + reached in Greece some two thousand years ago. When + we look kindly upon (to us) impossible views, with some + idea of thesis and antithesis in our minds, we are taking + our own position as the synthesis, and, placing ourselves + at the standpoint of the whole, implying knowledge of + that far off, divine event towards which the Tennysonian + creation moves. But if we really think the truth of our + vision worth striving for, it is dangerous to hold our reputation + for urbanity to be of more importance than insight, + by smiling down on opponents as on children at play, not + worth fighting. Imperfect as it is, our little truth must + seem to us, as it stands, better than any other, without + smoothing away the stark contradiction between it and its + opposite, and without claiming for it a higher level than + for them, if it is to be at once effective and humble.</p> + + <p>To all of this it may be answered that our idea of tolerance + has been an impossible ideal; that simply by making + the definition unwarrantably strict, the quality has + been pushed out of reach; and that, on these terms of + course it cannot exist. Nevertheless the exact quality of + current attempts at tolerance is made visible in the light + of that extreme form which we have been considering: as + Plato judged the success of actual forms of the state by + <a class="pagenum" id="page104" title="104"> </a>comparison with that perfect justice which was to be found + in none of them. But if, as the situation suggests, the + degree of tolerance is in inverse ratio to the force of conviction, + we cannot hold both as ideals. The question is, + Which is the more valid?</p> + + <p>By assuming tolerance as a possession or even as a goal, + we have lost that driving power of conviction which more + primitive, less imaginative forms of belief still hold. Perfect + tolerance would be an anæsthetic influence; it would + militate against that clash of open conflict in which alone + are ideas tested. If tolerance is to be achieved only by + proportionate weakening of conviction, the prevailing + acceptance of such an ideal may be not merely a crying for + the moon, but for a burning toy balloon which would be + of no value to us if we had it.</p> + + <p>The past few centuries have deepened the conception + of tolerance, given inner meaning as a virtue to what was + originally only a convenience of social conduct. Tolerance + in act has been proved practically advisable. It + rests on the recognition that the intolerant Calvin, burning + Servetus, was a more positively objectionable member + of society than the Greek sage whose skepticism was so + complete that he would commit himself to nothing more + than the wagging of his finger. But if we are right in + maintaining the incompatibility of tolerance and conviction, + each gaining ground only at the expense of the + other, are we not following the wrong star? Calvin was + doubtless less pleasant to live with than the Greek skeptic; + but, since clear definition of issues is the first step in + judgment, the following of the harsher example may clear + the way for those battles of thought which change the + boundaries of its territories, when diplomacies accomplish + nothing.</p> + + <p>Socrates, according to Plato, must have spent a good + many hours and days in buttonholing young men on the + streets of Athens, and pricking the airy bubbles of the + catchwords which they used so glibly. His inveterate + <a class="pagenum" id="page105" title="105"> </a>questioning often seemed to lead only to a deadlock. + “What <em>is</em> this justice, this temperance, this courage, of + which you seem so sure?”—he would ask, and, after + leading them a merry chase along the mazes of thought, + brought them to the reluctant conclusion that virtue is + not so simple, after all. There was something of the + spirit of the detective in this sleuthing among ideas, this + quick recognition and rejection of clues. What Socrates + was chiefly trying to do—and no wonder he was accused + of corrupting the young men!—was to cultivate in his + interlocutors the rare art of questioning, to extirpate in + them the prevalent stupidity of taking things for granted.</p> + + <p>But Socrates did not cure the world of using catchwords. + In war, in politics, in religion, even in science, + they still pass for the coin of the realm. They are always + dangerous: for they always delude one into thinking to + be easy that which is in truth most difficult. There is + hardly a virtue which we can have without crowding out + another virtue. We of the twentieth century have taken + tolerance for granted, as if it were as much to be expected + as good manners. And we have scarcely thought + to ask the price for which it is bought.</p> + + <p>If it is only a utilitarian matter of social policy, to be + relinquished when that policy changes, we have done + foolishly to exalt it as a moral virtue. If we must choose + between tolerance and our sense of ascertainable truth + in the world, our eyes should be open to the terms of that + choice; if we must have a slogan, shall it be, Live and + Let Live, or The Truth is Mighty and Shall Prevail? If, + on the other hand, the field of tolerance is limited to + cases in which we are indifferent or skeptical, much is + to be gained in humility and sincerity by the frank + avowal. We may cut the Gordian knot, and boldly + accept the paradox. In any case, something is gained, if + only that we have asked, What do we mean by tolerance?</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_9"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page106" title="106"> </a>THE NEO-PARNASSIANS</h2> + + <p class="epigram">“… But I would implore them to abstain from wearing their knees out + before the shrine of the ugly and grotesque when there is all the beauty of the + world for the choosing.”—<span class="special_name">Sir Johnstone Forbes-Robertson.</span></p> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">Away</span> back in the dark ages, when the kindergarten + was still an experiment, a stern elderly person—doubtless + a relic of the yet earlier age in which children + addressed their mother as “Honoured Madam,” and + never sat down in their father’s presence—a person of + far-seeing but ruthless mind, would every now and then + arise to predict that Froebel and his disciples, by making + things too easy for the infant intelligence, would produce + a spineless generation, with the mentality of rubber dolls. + Changing the figure, with apparently an eye upon the + dentist, this pessimist would point out that a pap-fed race + could have occasion for, and therefore would develop, no + teeth.</p> + + <p>It is far from my purpose to venture, with presumptuous + foot, into the happy fields of pedagogy: it is only + that certain straws, gyrating in the intellectual zephyrs of + the moment, have arrested an inquiring eye, and awakened + a mental question as to how far the disaffected prophet + may have been right. Is the multiplication-table set to + music, and gayly sung rather than acquired with labor and + sorrow in the dark watches of the study-hour after school, + really responsible for a contemporary mental condition + which seems to demand that even the simplest short story + be expounded by the editor, in type which dwarfs the title, + lest the readers’ brains grope vainly for its meaning? + Have our early fumblings with strips of many-colored + paper rendered us incapable of coping with even the most + obvious canvas? Were those well-beloved blocks and + cubes the true instigators of Csaky, Brancusi, Delaunay, + and the rest—sculptors who last year set us gasping? + Did “Birdie in the treetop” blaze the trail for the divers + <a class="pagenum" id="page107" title="107"> </a>exponents of “interpretative dancing?” Most harrowing + of all, have the “finger-plays” of babyhood, designed for + the gradual awakening of the child’s consciousness to his + five senses and his little ego, led up to the reverberating + chaos of words which we are now called upon seriously + to regard as poetry?</p> + + <p>Let the responsibility rest where it may, we have been + relentlessly herded and driven far by those who in this + day and generation assume to mold our opinions for us. + We have survived the onslaught of Cubism, Futurism, + St. Vitism and what not, in art: is there anything in stone + or bronze, or on canvas, that can now take us by surprise? + We have outlived the shock, and can even derive pleasure + from the spectacle, of our elders joyously cavorting between + the tables when we ask them out to dine; other + times, other manners. We have learned to listen unabashed + and with the proper modicum of concern while + Sweet-and-twenty, who has been to the “movies” and + knows whereof she speaks, discourses between the soup + and fish upon themes erstwhile supposed to be undiscussible, + unless by physicians and students of sociology. + We can even look without remonstrance upon our nearest + and dearest attired only less frankly than Josephine when + she essayed to convince the world of the superiority of + her challenged charms to those of Madame Tallien. We + have had hitherto one refuge when all this grew too much + for us: we could exclaim, if we still had the hardihood to + quote Tennyson, “I will bury myself in my books”—of + course omitting the remainder of the line, which is “unsocial.” + Now this stronghold also has been battered + down. If we seek diversion in a story which is really a + story, and not a tract—if we venture still to take pleasure + in those who until to-day have been considered poets—we + are upheld to the contumely of our fellows as “primitive,” + “elementary,” and our beliefs are made a by-word + and a hissing in the public prints. Ours not to reason + why, ours not to make reply: we are expected to go for + <a class="pagenum" id="page108" title="108"> </a>artistic and literary pabulum where we are sent—“forty + feeding as one,” like Wordsworth’s cattle; and perhaps, to + borrow once more from the Light Brigade, ours but to + do and die, intellectually, may be the result.</p> + + <p>Doubtless most of the “advanced investigators” (inspired + circumlocution of M. Andre Salmon) in both art + and literature are sincere; yet it seems an almost unavoidable + conclusion that this epidemic which is upon us in + many forms, all disagreeable and unnecessary, like any + other epidemic, arises from a physiological condition akin + to the tarantism which once swept southern Europe, + giving the tarantella its name, and not to be cured even + by the startling method of burying the victim up to the + neck in earth. The mythic spider having bitten him, + whirl he must, until he drop exhausted. Crueler than the + earlier spider of whose bite noble Tom Thumb died, the + ferocious arachnid of our day, like the <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">Lycosa tarantula</em> of + the Middle Ages, is ravaging at will, and sparing no age, + sex, or previous condition of activity. The “bite” may + not prove fatal: but while the madness lasts, clarity of + vision, calm and coherent utterance, are not to be expected. + The dervish-like frenzy of literary and artistic + production will of course eventually wear itself out; but + until it does, those who by Heaven’s mercy have been + spared the infection can only, with what patience the + gods vouchsafe, stand out of the way and look on, deafened + by the insistent remedial strains.</p> + + <p>Even as heat-waves above the summer fields and sands + cause fixed objects to shimmer and fluctuate before the + eyes, sometimes creating actual mirage, so the extraordinary + brain-waves of our day seem to influence human + conduct and, necessarily, its reflex, achievement in art + and letters. It is not that both subject and handling are + so often grotesque or deplorable; it is not—though the + spread of any epidemic is regrettable—that more and + more worthy craftsmen fall victims, hypnotised by others’ + gyral eccentricities, and by what a recent promulgator of + <a class="pagenum" id="page109" title="109"> </a>the cult terms “the strident and colossal song.” It is + that these, clamoring for their own prepossession, deny + us ours!</p> + + <p>“Dolly,” besought the heroine of Miss Broughton’s + first novel, the novel which created a school of fiction, + and which her unsuspecting father told her was unfit for + her, a young woman, to read: “Dolly, am I so very ugly? + Look!” Her sister, thus adjured, surveyed the appealing + face. “I do not admire you,” she returned, calmly. “But + that is no reason why some one should not!” Cannot the + apostles of the tarantist persuasion, in its varying manifestations, + show us an equal liberality? They do not + admire what one of them has summed up as “the completely + solved, tabulated, indexed problems of the past:” + but may not others who do be permitted to enjoy them + in peace, unobjurgated? Those who are labelled “early-Victorian,” + “primitive,” “elementary,” are usually possessed + of the ornament, no less out of date, of a meek and + quiet spirit; and, if let alone, will continue on their unobtrusive + way, neither assailing nor disparaging schools + whose inspirations do not attract them. Why may they + not be permitted to adhere to their ideals, unwhipt of + neo-justice?—since the untrammelled tarantist proclaims + with no hesitating voice his right to stand up, + naked and unashamed, for his own!</p> + + <p>There is one certain result of intellectual or any other + sort of bullying; present forcibly enough to any man that + he is merely a worm, and he is bound in the nature of + things to “turn,” with what vigor he may—and as the + late Sir William Gilbert well said, “Devil blame the + worms!” Tell a man often enough, and contemptuously + enough, that he doesn’t know what he is talking about, + and his most cherished beliefs are only so much junk, and + you inevitably goad him into nailing his colors to the mast. + The holy martyrs need not have died for their convictions + if they had not been badgered into, not merely holding, + but flaunting them! Again, to fall back upon my Gilbert, + <a class="pagenum" id="page110" title="110"> </a>“versifier” and master of “smart-aleckry” though it + seems he was, as measured by a recent standard—</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>“I hate to preach, I hate to prate,</p> + <p class="i4">I’m no fanatic croaker;”</p> + </div> + + <p class="continued_paragraph">and I am driven to couch my lance and gallop into the + lists chiefly by a modern form of challenge unrecognized + of Chivalry: “My ladye is fairest because yours is foul + and void of grace!” Your lady is fairest?—no man has + a better right than you to think so, or to say so: but it is + unknightly to attempt bolstering up her claims by a personal + attack upon <em>my</em> ladye, whose charms I justifiably + hold to be supreme. The glaive being down, there is + nothing for it but the onset—and may the best man win!</p> + + <p>In less archaic phrase, no man who knows his Milton + and his Wordsworth can sit silent and be told that “when + a perfect sonnet” (a <em>perfect</em> sonnet, remember!) “is duly + whittled out, it is usually found to be worth about as + much as a well-crocheted lambrequin”—whatever that + may be. No man who has delighted in his Praed, his + Ingoldsby, his Locker, Calverley, Lang, Austin Dobson, + Owen Seaman and the rest, can see them all swept into + the scrap-heap as “worn out—an exhibition of adroitness + … for impressing a circus audience!” No man + can hear with patience the undoubted fact that the blank + verse of Shakspeare and Milton was “written quite without + rhyme,” adduced, with an air of giving light to them + that sit in darkness, by way of supporting a hurly-burly of + words which has been well compared to “pumpkins + rolling over a barn-floor.” That blank verse does not + rhyme is too “elementary” to need discussion: and the + Eocene minds which still read Shakspeare, Milton, and + even Tennyson, are thoroughly aware that the construction + of blank verse is governed by no less rigorous rules + than the sonnet or the dainty old French forms which + Austin Dobson and our own Bunner made exquisite in + English. But the foe of rhyme is by no means limited to + <a class="pagenum" id="page111" title="111"> </a>blank verse in support of his thesis: experiments in unrhymed + metre are by no means new. Bulwer tamed the + Latin verse-forms to eat out of his hand; Ossian and his + collateral descendant, “Fiona Macleod,” made chamber + music of the wild harp of the Gael; Aldrich, in his youth, + went far toward establishing his fame with the <cite>Ballad + of Baby Bell</cite>: Charles Henry Lüders, untimely dead a + generation ago, achieved a gem in his brief dirge, <cite>The + Four Winds</cite>. One may be a poet without ever having + written a line in metre. It is doubtful whether Mrs. Meynell’s + well-won reputation—a reputation which brought + her, in a “popular ballot” for England’s laureateship, + nearly six thousand votes, and a place second only to + Rudyard Kipling—does not rest quite as much upon the + poetic beauty of her essays as upon her verse. “The + mighty engine of English prose” is always available for + the writer with “a message;” Lincoln did not elect to + “sing” his Gettysburg address, which no recent bard + whom it has been my privilege to read has surpassed. + If the bearer of the “message” have not the sense of + music which produces that perfection of rhythm needing + no grace of rhyme; if he object to rhyme “because,” + according to a recent candid outburst, “it is so confoundedly + hard to find!” the lyre and even the oaten pipe are + not for him. Nothing is easier to compass, in either prose + or metre, than the cryptic, the portentous; the bellow of + the trombone, the thud of the big drum, will always cause + some one to listen, at least long enough to find out + what is causing the disturbance. But neither Vorticist, + Polyrhythmicist, nor any other specialist in Parnassian + wares, need flatter himself that lines of assorted lengths, + huddled like jack-straws, make poetry. If any message + be there, it is obscured and marred by its uncouth disguise; + if there be no message, the “work” has even less + excuse for being. I am far from denying the right of every + one to express himself in whatever way he think fit: it is + wholly his own affair, and it may be, like Benedick’s + <a class="pagenum" id="page112" title="112"> </a>hypothetical lady’s hair, “of what color it please God.” + But if it be neither verse nor honest prose—if it be + cacophony for mere cacophony’s sake—he who takes in + vain for it the name of poetry, does it little service.</p> + + <p>One of the strange symptoms of the modern tarantism + is this unrelenting hostility to beauty: in fashion not less + than in art it is the ugly and the queer, in fiction and verse + the pathological, the unpleasant, that seem to be assiduously + striven for. The arts are sisters, children of one + father; their aims are closely allied, and if one step down + from her high estate, the others are likely soon to show the + unfortunate influence of her example. Bad taste in + sculpture affects us more disagreeably than bad taste in + painting, because sculpture stands forth with us, in our + own atmosphere, while the picture confines within its + frame an atmosphere of its own; bad taste in dancing is + worse in the drawing room than on the stage, being by + so much nearer; and bad taste in literary expression is + more distressing than any, because, after all, it is only + music which has so intimate an appeal as the written word. + Only music and the written word become a part of us, + dwelling with us unsought, singing to us unurged, lingering + with us in the silent hours when our mental sentinels or + taskmasters are off guard, and if a graceless pretender, + professing to be what he is not, intrude upon the starry + company of the heaven-born, shall not the intrusion be + resented?</p> + + <p>What is poetry? There are many definitions with which + few of us can quarrel; but one of the most direct, and at + the same time most comprehensive, is that poetry is the + expression, in terms of beauty, of what humanity feels—that + beauty of thought, beauty of feeling, beauty of form, + which implies truth, sympathy, clarity of vision, imagination, + and the unerring sense of fitness which is good taste. + And if this God-given beauty, twin-sister to music, be + not inextricably woven, like a three-fold thread of gold, + through and through the very fabric of the soul, it is never + <a class="pagenum" id="page113" title="113"> </a>to be acquired—no mastery of prosody, of rules, of + libraries full of the “best examples,” will avail. It is distinct + from inspiration, which may be a single bolt from + the blue: it is rather an attribute, to venture upon the + methods of Sir Boyle Roche, of the voice of that inmost + higher self which the late F. W. H. Myers called “the subliminal + mind” and which Maeterlinck has termed “our + unknown guest.” Let the man whose literary endeavor, + well-intended though it be, is without this essence, call + himself what he please: he is not, nor can he ever be, a + poet.</p> + + <p>Meanwhile, those who remain unbitten of the dread + <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">Lycosa</em> may find peace in M. Andrè Salmon’s dictum that + “critics encourage the most absurd, for the most absurd + is necessary to art”—which may be stretched to include + the art of letters—and anything that is really necessary + may, by right effort, be endured. It is sufficiently clear + that not on this side of the bridge of Al Sirat shall we and + the Neo-Parnassians agree: but we can at least avoid each + other like gentlemen.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_10"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page114" title="114"> </a>HUMANISM AND DEMOCRACY</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">When</span> our fathers formulated their program for + democracy, and announced that its chief objective + was to secure for the individual, life, liberty, and the + pursuit of happiness, contemporary records show that + they generally believed that if these ends could be attained, + a new golden age would be inaugurated among + men, and that all the various ills would drop out of + life. We have been disillusioned. Since the formulation + of the Declaration of Independence we have learned + the extreme antiquity of man upon the earth, and + we have learned by what slow and tortuous paths + the human family has zigzagged up to its present state + of imperfection. To-day we do not hope that any + form of government can assure us an immediate millennium, + and we look with suspicion upon any prophet who + promises an immediate utopia. Condemned as we are + to look with straining eyes towards a distant land of + promise, some remote perfection of our race, we are all + the more jealous of our chance to do our bit in achieving + that goal. The inalienable right to life, liberty, and pursuit + of happiness, has yielded place to the inalienable + right to grow. Forms of government seem worthy to + endure, in proportion as they minister to growth. We + still cling to democracy, because it still seems to promise + the largest chance for growth. It is a significant fact + that along with the phrase “make the world safe for + democracy,” there has sprung into existence the phrase + “make democracy safe for the world,” as if to warn us + that democracy like all forms of government, is not an + end in itself, but a means to an end, and that end is + humanism.</p> + + <p>In conceiving this paper, my patriotic purpose was + to prove how humanism helps democracy, but all the + <a class="pagenum" id="page115" title="115"> </a>way along I have been conscious of being guilty of an + enormous <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">hysteron proteron</em>, for the real issue is not how humanism + helps democracy, but how much democracy helps + humanism. And what is humanism? Something too large + to be defined in a single sentence or paragraph. It is a + number of things. In the first place humanism is humaneness; + not exactly, however, the kind of humaneness + that the editor of the <cite>New Republic</cite> believes in. Perhaps + you remember how a year ago a distinguished professor + of Greek hung a metaphorical millstone about the neck + of Mr. Abraham Flexner and cast him into the midst + of the sea, because he had attempted to poison the well-springs + of knowledge for a whole generation of young + people. On the millstone was inscribed the indictment: + “Mr. Flexner is not the first man who has had the courage + of his insensibilities.” At this the editor of the <cite>New + Republic</cite> declared that the distinguished professor had + been very inhumane, and was therefore an unfit exponent + of the humanities. One wonders with what gentle and + humane words Minos and Aeacus and Rhadamanthus + will speak to Mr. Flexner when he comes to judgment + in that long line of those who, having done irreparable + harm in this world, present as their only excuse the fact + that they were sincere in their good intentions. Humanism + is humaneness based where Socrates and Plato + based it, on knowledge, understanding and intelligence.</p> + + <p>Humanism is a conservation of the highest achievements + of the human spirit. It gives substance to the + seemingly paradoxical belief that for the rank and file + of men, nine-tenths of the future lies in the past,—that + certain giant men long dead, still have power to lead + the race to heights that the majority of us but dimly + see. To put it negatively, humanism represents the belief + that a majority of each generation go to their graves + without having entered upon their inheritance, without + even having suspected that they had an inheritance, + <a class="pagenum" id="page116" title="116"> </a>having lived not so much in their sins, as in ignorance + of the glory that humanity has already attained.</p> + + <p>A true humanism will include and properly appraise + the mental achievements of its own age. The danger + always is that the newer achievements will be seen out + of all proportion, and overrated because of their nearness. + To-day we are dazzled and blinded by the stupendous + achievements of a new materialism, a materialism far + subtler than that which sprung up a century ago. In the + first half of the Nineteenth Century some men of repute + were saying that “the brain secretes thought as the liver + secretes bile,” and “life is but the action of the sun’s rays + upon carbon.” Against this gross and crass materialism + Emerson arose as our champion, a prophet who had + lighted his torch at the altar of Prometheus in the Academy + of Plato. By the light of that torch men again + began to see things in true proportion, and to-day + we can say of those earlier materialists “their knowledge + is the wisdom of yesterday.” But the new materialism + is far subtler, boasting far greater achievements. + Two years ago the headlines in the papers + announced that a man in Washington had talked by + wireless telephony with a man in Hawaii. We were + filled with pride at this new demonstration of the power + of the human mind to master the laws of the external + universe. And yet after all, the question is not how far + you talk, but what you say. Did the man in Washington + say to the man in Hawaii anything so important as the + messages which Plato sent by wireless across the centuries + to Emerson? When we read the prayer which + Plato put into the mouth of Socrates at the close of the + Phædrus: “Give me beauty in the inward soul; and + may the outward and inward man be as one. May I + reckon the wise to be the wealthy, and may I have such + a quantity of gold as a wise and temperate man can bear + and carry,” we are ready to strive to prepare ourselves + to be torch-bearers in the great race.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page117" title="117"> </a>This is no small program that humanism undertakes:—to + make a man thoroughly humane; to eradicate all the + brutal instincts and all the cruel traits which two hundred + thousand, perhaps two million years of savagery + have implanted in his nature; to conserve for him + and in him all the highest spiritual experiences of the + race; to make him a worthy member of any celestial + gathering however nobly conceived and constituted, this + is a program requiring not merely the fifteen or twenty + years usually allotted to formal education, but a lifetime, + and perhaps a million years beyond. The million + years beyond is too much for the practical man, + and he holds up his hands in protest, declaring: “Such + doctrine is too other-worldly for me. If you train + the children to tune their harps for another world, who + is going to kill the hogs, and dig the sewers, and mine the + coal?” To such a question I would reply in the same + tone: “You need not worry. There is a certain gentleman, + a veritable colossus on the educational sky-line, + who uses one foot to direct the schools at Gary, and the + other foot to trample down an over-rampant idealism + in New York City. He will see to it that the millennium + is not ushered in too hastily.” In the last municipal election + in the city of New York, we had a splendid example + of Tammany’s political astuteness in temporarily aligning + itself with the idealism of the proletariat on the east + side. To the foreigner who comes to this country, America + means one thing above all else, and that is the chance to + emerge from the class in which he was born. The rebellion + among the foreign population of New York + against the Gary system, was not a rebellion against industrial + education as such, but a rebellion against the + idea that their children were to have industrial education + and nothing more. Our practical man, even if he is unwilling + to look forward a million years, must at any rate + look back a million years. No one can hope to see our + educational problem in its true perspective unless he is + <a class="pagenum" id="page118" title="118"> </a>willing to take his stand at the entrance of a palæolithic + cave, and look across the centuries at the toils of our race + as it has attempted to differentiate the brutal from the + human.</p> + + <p>In every school house there are palæolithic children, + neolithic children, bronze age children, iron age children, + children of the golden age, children of a thousand different + aptitudes and limitations. The mussed up condition of + our educational program, the incoherent wrangling about + educational theory, is largely due to our failure to keep + this steadily in mind. Somehow we have not fully appreciated + the fact that endowment is more than training, + and we are still hoping that in some way we can perform + the miracle and carry the neolithic child on our shoulders + across the ten thousand, or possibly the fifty thousand, + years that intervene between him and abstract thought. + And because we have wished to do the greater miracle, + we have failed to do the lesser one that makes for the + slow but sure growth of the race. It is not strange that + a cry has gone up for vocational training. It is strange, + however, that we did not foresee this just demand, and + meet it even before the demand was made. At the present + moment there is danger that the interests of the more + gifted child will be sacrificed to meet the need of the less + gifted one, that our whole public school system will be + Garyized, and that the proper foundation of our higher + education will be impaired if not destroyed. In a neighboring + state a year or two ago, the state superintendent + of education sent out notes to the smaller high schools + advising that courses in domestic science and agriculture + be substituted for geometry and Virgil. It did not occur + to him that he could establish a lower form of education + without destroying a higher form. It did not occur to + him that the state was rich enough to pay for both forms. + Many years ago I lived near a rich stock-man who owned + the finest herd of shorthorn cattle in the Middle West. + He paid a man $2,000 a year to care for his cattle; he + <a class="pagenum" id="page119" title="119"> </a>sent his children to a school where no teacher received + more than five hundred dollars a year. I will not say + that he cared four times as much for his cattle as for his + children, but I will say that we have here the solution + of our problem. If we would spend four times as much + money on our elementary schools, vocational and industrial + courses could be properly established, classes could + be reduced from fifty to fifteen, the needs of each pupil + could be carefully studied, the pupil of lesser gifts could + be directed into industrial courses without humiliation, + and the pupil of higher gifts would make his way normally + and naturally to geometry and Virgil.</p> + + <p>In one year of the war we are spending twenty billion + dollars. The interest on this vast sum at four per cent. + is eight hundred million dollars a year,—or just fifty + millions more than we spent on all forms of education + last year in the United States. We are willing to spend + this amount of money to make the world safe for democracy. + Are we willing to spend a similar sum to put real + meaning and content into the word democracy? It is + conceivable that during the war we may become so accustomed + to giving and tax-paying that after the war + we may be willing to make similar sacrifices that democracy + may have a fair chance to bear its true and legitimate + fruits. In the first year of the war Mr. Rockefeller has + given to the Red Cross and other philanthropic causes + $70,000,000. He has done this with immense satisfaction, + and without serious inconvenience. It is to be hoped + that during the war he and our twenty-two thousand + other millionaires may become so accustomed to paying + income taxes that it may degenerate into a habit, and + that after the war, from this source our funds for education + may be doubled or trebled. Mr. Rockefeller should + be financing not merely Mr. Flexner’s experiment station + in secondary education; he should be financing a hundred + other secondary schools in an equally splendid way. But + we can never hope to make our educational program + <a class="pagenum" id="page120" title="120"> </a>really significant, merely by compelling the millionaires + to pay their rightful share of the expense. We shall + never succeed in this program, until we have become + sufficiently interested in the matter to be willing to make + sacrifices ourselves. It is with extreme regret that I am + compelled to admit that the heart of this great problem is + economic, and that the streets of the New Jerusalem we + are striving to build, must be not metaphorically, but + literally paved with gold.</p> + + <p>If we can assume that after the war industrial education + will be properly established and financed without + diverting funds from the higher forms of education, if + we can even assume that the funds available for the more + humanistic training will be greatly increased, there still + remain two potent forces in our educational world which + seriously threaten to undermine and impair our democracy + and the humanism which is its eventual goal. I + refer to the corrupting influence of athletics in our high + schools and colleges, and the attitude of the state towards + the small college.</p> + + <p>One can hardly “see life steadily and see it whole” + without recognizing the fact that it is necessary to house + a sound mind in a sound body; but after all, the supreme + thing is the sound mind. If our school and college athletics + had been willing to make this its chief objective, + little or nothing could be said in arraignment of athletic + contests. But the present athletic situation makes one + ready to cry aloud that ancient indictment found in a + fragment of the Autolycus of Euripides: “Of all the + countless ills that prey on Hellas, there is none that can + be compared with this tribe of athletes.”</p> + + <p>Since athletics have been introduced into the public + high schools of the Middle West, there is no question that + a somewhat larger number of boys have continued in the + high schools. There is also no question that there has + been a very marked lowering of intellectual standards. + And what is worse, our high school students and whole + <a class="pagenum" id="page121" title="121"> </a>communities have been imbued with a false sense of proportion. + To run half as fast as a greyhound, to jump + one-fifth as far as a kangaroo, to kick one-tenth as hard + as a Missouri mule, these are the principal things, these + are the weightier matters of the law. These contests + with the brute world, in which we are always defeated, + have taken the place of the higher intellectual contests + of humanism. The school superintendent or principal + who can turn out a winning team, he is the man, the new + patriot in our democracy. Let me illustrate. Three years + ago in one of the small towns of Iowa, the superintendent + of schools received a considerable increase in salary because + he had turned out a basket ball team that had defeated + all the teams in the neighboring high schools. The + next fall four members of the winning team entered the + State University of Iowa as freshmen. Before the end + of the year they had all been sent home because they + could not do their intellectual tasks.</p> + + <p>But to turn to a second menace to humanism—the + attitude of the state towards the small college, or perhaps + it would be truer to say the attitude of the administrative + officials of our state institutions towards the small + college. A conversation which I had last summer with + the dean of the college of liberal arts in one of our state + universities, will illustrate what I mean. In this conversation + the dean expressed the opinion that the great majority + of small colleges in the Middle West would be reduced + to junior colleges (i. e. their work would be limited + to the freshman and sophomore years), or meet with entire + extinction. He was even more specific in his prophecy, + saying that five per cent. of the colleges of the type of + College X would die or become junior colleges during + the war (if the war lasted three years) because of the reduced + income from tuition, and reduced financial assistance + from private gifts. He made this prophecy with + a smile, as one heralding a blessing. For the moment + he forgot that a majority of the students in his graduate + <a class="pagenum" id="page122" title="122"> </a>school came from colleges of the same class as College X, + and he failed to foresee that if his prophecy were fulfilled, + large sections of the state would be left in educational + darkness. Now College X has had an honorable history + of forty-five years. It has done much to make democracy + safe for the world. It has sent out hundreds of + graduates and ex-students fit to participate in self-government, + and with some notion of what is meant + by an international mind. At the present moment it + counts among its alumni one hundred and forty-two who + are engaged in teaching, including one university president + who administers $18,000,000 for educational purposes, + and twenty-five college professors in such institutions + as Beloit, Drury, Dupauw, Lawrence, Grinnell. + Many others of its alumni, on their way to law, medicine, + theology, have served the state effectively as teachers. + And yet the dean would brush aside this work with a + smile, would allow this college and similar colleges to + die or be reduced to junior colleges, without a word of + protest, perhaps in the thought that his own college of + liberal arts would minister adequately to the educational + needs of the state. In that state at the present moment + privately endowed institutions are caring for more than + twenty thousand students, and are making an annual gift + to the state of more than three million dollars. These institutions + are well scattered, and reach localities untouched + by the university. Higher education must be carried to + the various communities. The number of young people + that can be sent to college is increased fivefold, if those + young people can be housed and boarded at home, and + if there is no railroad fare to pay. To illustrate: the + county in which the state university in question is located, + sends seven hundred and eighty-nine students to + the university, more than the total number sent by sixty-three + counties in remote corners of the state. Out of + five hundred degrees conferred by the university in one + year, one-fifth go to students residing in the county in + <a class="pagenum" id="page123" title="123"> </a>which the university is situated. It is obvious that the + university is bringing higher education to one county, + and failing to bring it to sixty-three counties. The work + however is being done by the small colleges. But the + dean was right when he intimated that many of these + small colleges are fighting for their lives. Twenty-five + years ago the professors in College X were receiving + $1,500 a year,—a home missionary’s salary even in + those days; but to-day they are still getting $1,500. Last + year a deficit made a considerable inroad on the endowment + fund. This year the deficit will be larger, because + seventy of her advanced students have gone into the + army. And the state stands by in indifference, watching + an institution die that has served it well for forty-five + years—an institution that it must replace at public + expense, or leave a corner of the state in educational + darkness. I think that the real hope of the dean was + that such colleges might be reduced to junior colleges, + and that the available funds might be spent in improving + the instruction in the freshmen and sophomore years. + But he could hardly say this, for last year the students + in his own university were loudly protesting that they + were being neglected, and that teaching had been sacrificed + on the altar of research. But even if the dean could + not say it, why is it not a reasonable suggestion? Why + not cut off the last two years of the college course and + improve the instruction in the earlier years? For the + simple reason that the state is too rich to permit of any + curtailment of the opportunity of intellectual growth + for its young people. It is gratuitous assumption that + the students who had done two years’ work in the small + college would complete their work in the university. The + small minority who are going into professional work + would do this, but the large majority would end their + training with the sophomore year, and democracy and + humanism would suffer simultaneously an irremediable + blow. Let us hope that the historians of later times will + <a class="pagenum" id="page124" title="124"> </a>not be compelled to write: “In 1917 the Kaiser not only + blew up the cathedrals in France, but he also helped to + dynamite our American colleges.”</p> + + <p>There is an old proverb to the effect that the streets + of Jerusalem were kept clean by every man sweeping that + part which lay before his own door. On one side of our + domain runs the Lincoln Highway, on the other side the + road which began before the altar of Prometheus in the + groves of Academe. Both of these roads later converge + in that straight and narrow path that leads unto life. + It is our high function to keep these roads free and unobstructed—to + walk a few parasangs with gifted young + people; to fit them to be effective ambassadors of Truth, + by persuading them to thumb a Latin lexicon until + they have attained a reasonable precision of speech; to + help them attain the refinement of diction that shall + eventually result in a greater refinement of character; to + teach them to appreciate the beauty of a Greek temple or + of a fragment of Greek sculpture, furnishing them with + a basis of æsthetic judgment, that will serve them well + until they meet Plato’s archetypes face to face; to feed + their imagination with the radiant buoyant life of Homer; + to show them how Horace fashioned a livable life philosophy + out of the <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">aurea mediocritas</em> of Aristotle; to initiate + them into the Socratic doctrine that Knowledge is the + mother of all the virtues; to crown them with a universal + sympathy by interpreting with them the “<em lang="la" xml:lang="la">Lachryma + rerum</em>” of Virgil. Can anyone conceive a life in which + pleasure and duty are more inextricably intermingled?</p> + + <p>This is the humanism that is the fairest fruit of democracy, + and which in turn makes democracy possible. Two + years ago I heard one of our most eminent political economists + say in a public address that the chance of success + for a democratic form of government was in direct proportion + to the number of citizens who were capable of + abstract thought. We do our abstract thinking in the + main through the help of Greek and Latin derivatives. + <a class="pagenum" id="page125" title="125"> </a>Let us not underestimate, and let us not permit anyone + else to underestimate, the importance of our contribution + to the success of democracy, when we train our students + to a certain precision in the use of Greek and Latin + derivatives, by long years of patient drill in careful translation. + It is our privilege to help develop their latent + powers of abstract thought by furnishing them with the + tools with which they may do their thinking. This is the + largest single contribution we can make to human life, + the largest single offering we can lay on the altar of Truth.</p> + + <p>Our success in holding ourselves and our students to + this great task will be determined largely by the set of + life values we carry into the class room, and by our ability + to differentiate that which is important in Greek and + Roman civilization from that which is negligible and unessential. + I sometimes fear that we have forgotten that + only the higher elements of any civilization are worthy + to be transmitted to posterity, and that forgetting this + we have permitted many of our courses to be denaturized, + dehumanized, and Germanized.</p> + + <p>In seven out of ten of the text-books of the classics edited + for college use, the notes are written, not for freshmen and + sophomores, but for those who have already attained or + are going to attain the degree of doctor of philosophy, + a degree that was first made in Germany. This blight + of the doctor’s degree has invaded not only our courses + in the classics, but every course in the university curriculum + that can in any sense be called a humanistic course. + It is high time that we form a solemn procession and + make an offering on the altar of Robigo, god or goddess + of the rust.</p> + + <p>In the natural and physical sciences we do not resent + or criticize futile experimentation. We are willing that + that six hundred and five futile experiments may be made + that the six hundred and sixth may be successful. We + expect this work of experimentation to be more or less + dehumanizing, in its drudgery, that in the end the fruit + <a class="pagenum" id="page126" title="126"> </a>of the successful experiment may confer some blessing + upon the human family. We do not protest against a + doctor’s dissertation in science in which the results are + wholly negative. But we do protest against a doctor’s + dissertation in literature or history, which has compelled + the <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">doctor designatus</em> to spend months of his time on some + inconsequential subject, giving him a false perspective + and a false sense of proportion that it will take him years + to get rid of in his teaching.</p> + + <p>Let it be understood that this protest against the doctor’s + degree is not a protest against the length of time + that is given to graduate studies in preparation for teaching. + This should be increased rather than diminished. + It is a protest against some of the objects to which + years of graduate study have been devoted under the + shadow of the doctor’s degree. It is “a place in the sun” + that we are demanding. In using this phrase “a place + in the sun,” I am not plagiarizing that one whom Henry + Van Dyke has christened “the damned vulture of Potsdam,” + but a far better man, Diogenes of Sinope, who + once requested Alexander the Great to get out of his + daylight and give him his place in the sun.</p> + + <p>In conclusion let me cite an incident from the life of + Zeno, the founder of Stoicism. It is related that Zeno + once asked the oracle what he ought to do to live in the + most excellent way. The reply came back that he ought + to become of the same complexion as the dead. Whereupon + he immediately inferred that he ought to apply + himself to reading the books of the ancients. This is the + Zeno who promulgated the doctrines of the fatherhood + of God and the brotherhood of man, who fashioned the + molds in which the Roman Law and Roman Christianity + were cast, who conceived of a world democracy in + which friendship should be the guiding principle, and + in which Greek and barbarian alike should have equal + privileges and equal opportunities for growth.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_11"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page127" title="127"> </a>THE MODERN MEDICINE MAN</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">Medicine</span>, like other natural phenomena tends to + the cyclic. Having passed safely through the + drug period of evolution, both allopathic and homeopathic, + into the no-drug state of so-called “preventive + medicine” which has nothing to do with medicine as the + word is commonly understood, this ancient mystery of the + cure of bodies is now reunited to its equally ancient but + long alienated mate the cure of souls, and this bewildered + generation is confronted with the amazing spectacle of + the lion of science and the lamb of religion lying down + together. Whether the ultimate resting place of the + lamb will be inside the lion is not yet disclosed to the + anxious and inquiring mind. Again the priest and the + physician are combined in one person, and we see before + us the modern counterpart of the antique medicine man + who exorcised the devils that possessed and tormented + the soul and the body, and by sorcery and incantations + treated impartially diseases of the spirit and of the flesh. + Again the accepted cure for blindness is to “go and sin + no more.”</p> + + <p>It is especially that borderland where soul and body + meet and fuse in what a recent treatise on the diseases + of the nervous system calls “the psychic or + symbolic system” that the modern medicine man takes + as his province. In this No Man’s Land he is master of + all he surveys, and his sextant comprises the universe in + its angle.</p> + + <p>We are prone to think of diseases of the mind as a specialty + of modern life. But the briefest review of history + would indicate that these symptoms of maladjustment + to the environment have been evident from the earliest + times. Adam and Eve are said to have developed “paranoiac + <a class="pagenum" id="page128" title="128"> </a>delusions of persecution,” a kind of <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">manie à deux</em>, + accompanied by hallucinations of vision described as + “seeing snakes.” Their elder son was afflicted with a + “homicidal mania,” while the younger was apparently a + case of “constitutional inferiority.” Noah was a well + recognized “alcoholic,” Job was subject to severe “depressions,” + Nebuchadnezzar exhibited “praecox dilapidations + of conduct” and Saul was a pronounced “manic-depressive.” + The Bible contains many edifying and + well worked-out case histories with prescriptions for the + treatment of such difficulties. It was Isaiah who outlined + the newer method when he said, on the highest + authority, “Come now, and let us reason together, saith + the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as + white as snow.”</p> + + <p>It was perhaps through dwelling on his own race history + and literature that the newest prophet in Israel, the famous, + to some infamous, Viennese professor, Sigmund + Freud, came to invent the latest prophylaxis for mental + disorders, now widely known under the name of psychoanalysis, + at present the best recognized specific for many + mental disorders, and particularly for those orgies and + “hang-overs” of the soul, the “manic-depressive psychosis.”</p> + + <p>This is the chief of the new designations for one of the + old diseases, the failing reserved for the especially refined + and subtle mind, the form of complex developed most + frequently in the most delicate psychological machinery. + This psychosis is the protest of the winged spirit against + the humdrum dead levels of the main-traveled roads, + a near relation to the “hysteric” refuge of the æsthetic + nature from the vulgarities of everyday life, the “præcox” + preference for childhood’s happy hour, and the “paranoiac” + escape from the banalities of a society composed too + exclusively of well-meaning, friendly but unbearably + tiresome folk. All these phenomena are but the outbreak + of the higher nature, the reaction of the superman, that + <a class="pagenum" id="page129" title="129"> </a>creature of light and air, to the dullness and dreariness of + this underworld, in which the chrysalis drags out its drab + and worm-like existence before the emergence of the + butterfly.</p> + + <p>In view, however, of the stubborn fact that the superman + must continue to exist (unless indeed non-existence + is the state preferred) in a world made up largely of subnormal, + or even more deadly normal beings, the overbred + and super-sensitive must seek some form of reconciliation + to the fundamental absurdities that pass for real life, + must even submit to something in the nature of a “cure” + for the disease of superevolution, some esoteric bloodletting + process as it were, in order to restrain the impulse + to skip like a lamb in the sun on the hillside, and confine + the gait to an anemic crawl along the narrow path of the + commonplace.</p> + + <p>Psychoanalysis appears to be the “indicated” treatment + for these adjustment difficulties, and it is the purpose + of this article to suggest to the as yet uninitiated + some of the novel features in the mechanism of this psychotherapy, + and to offer a few reflections thereon.</p> + + <p>To assume the greater ease of the first person singular, I + should perhaps say in passing, or by way of apology, that + if I appear somewhat unduly and indecently personal in + my observations on the new psychology, it is a habit + fastened upon me by a half year of indulgence in an orgy + of such voluble self discussion and analysis as I had previously + fondly fancied to exist only in young ladies’ boarding + schools. Figure to yourself, if you can, the inevitable + result of conversing about your “soul,” and unburdening + all its secrets and reserves in tri-weekly sessions with an + inquisitive stranger! The process is a throw-back to those + unsophisticated days when the Knight of La Mancha + and a group of other romantics, met for the first time by + accident in a country inn, whiled away the long evening + in the unrestrained and interminable narrations of their + lives and loves, complacently revealing to one anothers’ + <a class="pagenum" id="page130" title="130"> </a>sympathetic and, one would imagine, sometimes startled + gaze, the secret springs of their existence.</p> + + <p>The psychoanalytic process begins, I may explain, + with such a relating of one’s personal history, occupying + many hours, and covering all that one has ever done, said + or thought. One starts with reminiscences of the nursery + and the kindergarten, and passes on to a detailed description + of the coloring, height and contour of one’s first + love. As this, in the case of a woman, is supposed to be + her father, it is necessary to pause for some time on the + aspects of the paternal figure, which affect all her subsequent + emotional reactions, according to the well-known + course of the so-called “Oedipus complex.” This is the + imposing designation for the generally observed preference + for each other of mothers and sons and of fathers and + daughters, a phenomenon that the new psychologists, + who take the common place with a seriousness! deem + worthy of the most painstaking examination and erudite + elucidation. “The root complex” and “the family romance” + are other alluring titles for this parental-filial + relation. This sentiment is supposed to modify all the + so-called “affective” life. If father happens to be tall and + thin and blond, then daughter, having a “fixation” on + him, is, for all time to come, particularly susceptible to + the attractions of tall, thin, blond men of advanced years. + The analyst inquires minutely into the shades of complexion + of all the patient’s <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">inamorati</em> in a manner that recalls + the familiar “I see a dark man coming over deep water” + of the tea-leaves in the tea-cup stage of one’s experience.</p> + + <p>After the patient has sternly and heroically resisted + the temptation to invent in the interest of her own self-respect, + and also in mitigation of the ill-concealed contempt + of the masculine practitioner for the paucity of her experience, + a few more numerous and more romantic emotional + episodes than have actually been doled out to her + by a penurious fate, and has completed the short and + simple annals of her poverty-stricken heart history, and + <a class="pagenum" id="page131" title="131"> </a>after the incredulous inquisitor has become at last convinced + that there is indeed nothing more to be told, this + chapter is closed, and then begins the régime of dreams + and “free association.”</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">The interpreting of one’s dreams seems to furnish the + doctor with a secret source of amusement that he tries + in vain to dissemble, and as one is only too glad to make + up to him in some measure for the hours of obvious boredom + that he has endured while listening to one’s <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">apologia + pro vita sua</em>, one indulges him by forming the careful + habit of grasping firmly by the tail every elusive dream as + it tries to whisk around the corner of consciousness during + one’s first waking moments, pulling it painfully and resistingly + back for close and detailed scrutiny, and laboriously + committing to memory and subsequently describing + its every feature and function at the next matinée performance + at which one makes an appearance.</p> + + <p>The chastening discovery of the dreamer who relates + his dreams to the professional interpreter is that all that + has been carefully withheld from revelation in the related + autobiography, is disclosed with the most embarrassing + crudity, and that secret sins of which one was quite unconscious + are displayed with mortifying clarity. The + dream is a mechanism for letting the cat out of the bag, + all kinds of strange cats, of the existence of which their + harborer was often unaware.</p> + + <p>Dreams seem to reveal the dreamer as a hypocritical, + evasive, self-deluding coward, unable to face the commonest + facts of life, or to call a spade anything less innocent + than a parasol, or even to confront his own friends + and acquaintances, except by forcing them to masquerade + under some so-called “surrogate” form.</p> + + <p>My previous personal experience had led me to identify + a surrogate as some kind of judge, but I soon learned that + this narrow and technical meaning must be replaced by + the more general signification of “substitute,” though + <a class="pagenum" id="page132" title="132"> </a>why the word substitute should not be considered good + enough to use in this connection, I never learned. This + is but one of the many examples of the perverse preference + of the technicians of the new science for strange distortions + of words with well recognized and frequently quite + different meanings in common parlance. It comes as + somewhat of a shock to the beginner to hear all emotion + summarily classified as “sexual,” normal filial or parental + affection designated as “incestuous,” friendship as “homosexual,” + self-respect as “narcissistic” and the life force + or will to power as “the libido.” Soon, however, one + becomes as resigned to this strong language as to the + evolutionary hypothesis, and finds it a no more unpalatable + thought that all emotion is derived from sex than + that all human beings are descended from an apelike + ancestor. That this common use of the exaggerated + statement leaves no adequate expression for the more + intense emotions fails to disturb a cult that apparently + regards all differences of feeling as of degree rather than + of kind.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">The narration of dreams puts slight work on the + dreamer, and sorely taxes the mental resources and the + ingenuity of the interpreter, but the real labor, the strenuous + and unremitting toil to which the unhappy victim of + this ritual is subjected by a pitiless practitioner is in the + rigors of what goes by the disingenuous name of “free + association.” This may sound like some pleasant if not + spicy and highly unconventional pastime, but is in fact + and literally a procrustean bed of torture. The helpless + patient is forced to remove her bonnet and shawl and recline + upon a couch with her eyes closed. Her merciless + tormentor retires to a comfortable armchair in a corner + of the room. There, because he is out of sight of the + patient, he is supposed, according to the workings of + the mysterious masculine psychology, to be entirely removed + from her consciousness, so that she can concentrate + <a class="pagenum" id="page133" title="133"> </a>her mind on nothingness, just as if she were alone + by the fireside. Then he starts in with something like + the following initiation of the third degree: “What are + your associations with the word authority?” You are + supposed to respond to this irrelevant inquiry with + something like the following idiotic emanations, + “Government—Washington—the President—Mrs. Wilson—orchids—grandfather’s + greenhouse,” and if you are entirely + resigned to making a fool of yourself, and can + abandon yourself to the spirit of this child’s play, this is + what you finally learn to do, after many strenuous efforts + to play the game, and the final attainment of a reasonable + self-stultification.</p> + + <p>If, however, as is likely to be the case, you are a more or + less feminine person, instinctively unwilling to exhibit + your mind in <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">déshabille</em>, and fatuously intent with a persistency + worthy of a better cause on making a good impression + on the only person present, you learn to use these + opportunities to tell him everything to your credit that + you can think of, and by carefully working out, preferably + in advance, a chain of passable associations, to present + yourself, your character, and your career in the most + favorable light. The wide range of possibilities in this + process that are open to the designing patient seems to be + scarce dreamt of in the philosophy of the gross masculine + mind.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">This brings me by easy and inevitable stages to the + important topic of the “transference.” To the unenlightened + this may be defined as the mock modest and + deceptive designation invented by the psychoanalyst + for the more or less ardent affection for himself that he + cold-bloodedly sets out to inspire in his victim. The + doctor, for the benefit of his patient, temporarily transfers + to himself and appropriates the devotion which normally + belongs to father, brother, husband, son or lover. To be + sure, it is to remembered that as there is no such word + <a class="pagenum" id="page134" title="134"> </a>as friendship in the psychoanalytic vocabulary, an attitude + of confidence or admiration must be represented in + terms of a deeper sentiment.</p> + + <p>Of course what happens is that the patient mistakes for + an attachment of the heart what is in reality only an intimacy + of the mind, because such an abandon of reserve + is indissolubly associated in the feminine mind with the + ties of affection. According to the true Jamesian psychology, + she loves because she confides, instead of confiding + because she loves. How a poor man patient manages can + only be surmised, but there are indications that the knowing + of the sex furtively seek the ministrations of a woman + analyst.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Apparently the theory on which all the varied forms of + this treatment are based is that the catharsis of the mind + is essential to mental health, the emptying of all that is + in it, the expulsion of dead matter. The nausea of the + soul is relieved like its physical analogue by freeing it + from the undigested matter, the “repressions,” that lie + so heavily upon it. The self-contained nature that refrains + from spilling over and strives to maintain itself + without recourse to the safety valve of confidence must + in the end unload its burden.</p> + + <p>After the destructive process is completed and the + ground cleared for the constructive measures that are to + rear the temple of the “<em lang="la" xml:lang="la">mens sana in corpore sano</em>,” the + heavier half of the work remains to be done; for the gigantic + task to which the practitioner of the new prophylaxis + sets himself is nothing less than the reconstruction + of the character of the patient. Indeed, a recent work + on psychoanalysis has for its title <cite>The Mechanisms of + Character Formation</cite>. The conversions that the Rev. + Mr. Sunday and his less notable peers are wont to accomplish + in an hour, these painstaking scientists patiently + bring about in from some scores to some thousands of + hours of equally strenuous labor. I am informed that + <a class="pagenum" id="page135" title="135"> </a>the cure of the first case of a certain type undertaken by + one of these under-studies of the Eternal, actually consumed + two thousand hours, and that the cure of the specific + disease required the entire reconstruction of the character + of the sufferer. Presumably the bill for “professional + services” involved in this beatification was $20,000. One + wonders whether the character that resulted was worth + the price. The consulting room of the psychoanalyst + is the new Beauty Parlor where those dissatisfied with + their mental and moral physiognomy may have the lines + of stress and strain smoothed away, and may gain the + roses and lilies of a rejuvenated spiritual complexion. Unhappily + I am unable to speak at length and with authority + on this phase of the treatment; for I am at present only + just entering upon the period of metamorphosis. I see + dimly, “as through a glass darkly,” my own apotheosis + looming ahead, but the road to that celestial height looks + a long and weary and appallingly expensive journey.</p> + + <p>It is the time element that perhaps most impresses and + depresses the student of the new prophylaxis. In a recent + paper by a competent psychiatrist the writer refers as + follows to the impracticability of studying a group of + cases in a public hospital on the plan of getting the patients + to understand and explain their own difficulties:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>At the rate at which the best of the psychoanalysts work, it + would not be possible properly to study in the course of the + year more than a dozen cases. Furthermore, the results of + such work are of importance purely for the individual, and no + generalization can be drawn therefrom…. Also, no generalization + being possible, it is a matter of piece work; to study + one hundred cases according to this method would require the + efforts of fifteen to twenty psychologists on full time for many + months.</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>In the opinion of the faithful, Freud, the inventor of + psychoanalysis, is to psychiatry what Darwin was to + biology, but as Darwin’s theory of evolution required + more aeons than the geologists were able to oblige him + <a class="pagenum" id="page136" title="136"> </a>with, so Freud’s method requires more time than the + calendar affords. Darwin’s theory of the variation of + species had to be modified by the theory of mutations or + sports. Freud’s methods, to be workable, must be adapted + in some way to the indisputable fact that there are only + twenty-four hours in the day, and only three hundred and + sixty-five days in the year.</p> + + <p>A careful mathematical calculation of the number of + hours required to cure a psychosis by this new prophylaxis + reveals an alarming disproportion between the minute + number of physicians available, and the incalculable + number of patients requiring their ministrations. One + of the most ardent devotees of the new method is a practitioner + who, according to the testimony of a confrère, + enters upon his daily endurance test at 9 A. M. and without + any luncheon psychoanalyzes continuously until + 7 P. M. As the ordinary patient is supposed to require + three hours a week of this treatment, for about five + months, the doctor can, by working ten hours a day, + treat twenty patients in one week, or allowing him two + months vacation in summer (and he will need it) handle + forty patients in one year. This, alas, is but a drop of + medicine in the bucket of disease, and unless, by some + homeopathic adaptation of the five-hundredth-dilution + principle, we can make our medicine go farther it is only + a limited number of the rich and leisure class who can ever + be cured by these new methods. This is the prostrating + situation that confronts the humanitarian—a little + group of healers bravely but hopelessly taking up arms + against a sea of mental troubles.</p> + + <p>One cannot help wondering whether such exhaustive + thoroughness is really essential. It seems sometimes to + the disillusioned seeker after truth that the relation of the + conscious life history, the revelation of the unconscious + through dreams, the display of the mental processes + through “free association,” are but the hocus-pocus devised + for keeping up the conversation between the analyst + <a class="pagenum" id="page137" title="137"> </a>and the analyzed—a crude, clumsy, masculine technique + for discovering, by somewhat labyrinthine methods, the + essence of the personal quality of an individual. Might + not this be obvious in a few hours of ordinary intercourse + to a person of intuition, practised in the art of plucking + the heart out of a mystery, instead of chopping up the + whole anatomy to get at it?</p> + + <p>The expenditure of time and effort and money required + to gain the occult ends of what seems like a blind and + blundering process, is certainly colossal. What the patient + puts into it is comparatively unimportant. A fool and + his money might as well be parted sooner as later, and the + time of the patient, especially in the state of depression + in which he ordinarily seeks treatment, is worth so little + that killing it is as good a use as any to make of it. But + think of the physician—a man of parts, of much general + and special education, who has added to a large professional + equipment the complicated technique of a laborious + method that only a German thoroughness gone stark + and staring mad, could perpetrate on a makeshift world, + which, with all its failings, has not lost its sense of humor + or its perception of the relative value of things mundane, + and does still discriminate between time and eternity. + Think of a first rate mind expending itself for hours on + end in the minute scrutiny of some trivial neurotic mentality, + probably as like as two peas to thousands of other + equally insignificant particles of matter that pass for + individual organisms.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">If indeed the interest in another personality is the essence + of the “cure,” one is tempted to ask why these + egocentric erotomaniacs should not derive the same and + mutual benefit from interesting themselves in one another? + Why not pair them off, male and female as originally + created, and embark them together on this ark of refuge + from the deluge of the common life in which they are + drowning? Let them sit by the hour, the day, the week, + <a class="pagenum" id="page138" title="138"> </a>and talk about their “souls,” relate to each other’s absorbed + attention their life history, interpret each other’s + dreams, and join in the freest of “free association.” Let + the blind lead the blind, the sick heal the sick, the erotic + love the erratic, and silly soul mate with silly soul, leaving + the authentic souls of the doctors to be saved from stultification, + and their talents used for the benefit of human + beings who are really and truly suffering.</p> + + <p>But, alas, there seems to be no such easy panacea for + mortal ills: for to attain its ends the process must apparently + be presided over by a superior if not superhuman + intelligence. And the patient, if scientifically or benevolently + minded, can take comfort in the thought that + his case is perhaps sufficiently different from any hitherto + handled to enable the investigator to benefit almost as + much as the patient by the experience. Perhaps the + months that the biddable patient who has overcome his + “resistances” devotes to coöperating with the scientific + explorer, may be reduced to weeks in the treatment + of the next like-minded individual who submits himself + for treatment by the more practised practitioner. I + recall my despairing comment upon a doctor’s tale of the + case that it took two thousand hours to cure, and the reassuring + response that, now that the technique had been + worked out and published, any competent person could + turn the trick in from one-tenth to one-twentieth of the + time.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">The psychoanalytic approach to mental prophylaxis + is perhaps still, after twenty years of groping progress, + in the experimental stage. The few bold spirits who have + braved the ridicule of their conservative confrères, and + left the main travelled roads, are hardy pioneers blazing + trails and treading out paths that will in time be easy + traveling. It is inevitable that in the delicate operations + by which these spiritual sawbones are mastering the mystery + of this new art of the vivisection of the soul, they + <a class="pagenum" id="page139" title="139"> </a>should sometimes cause pain or even cut in the wrong + place. But they are inspired by a very human sympathy + for their victim-beneficiaries, and are rapidly learning their + way about the spiritual anatomy, and discovering the + skillful use of mental anæsthetics.</p> + + <p>The strangest thing about this extraordinary process + is that it really does cure the mind diseased. Where and + what, one asks, and continues to ask, is the nexus between + treatment and cure. Has any patient, however completely + recovered, ever found out? Do the practitioners of this + occult ritual know themselves, or have they simply hit + on a practical technique, without a comprehension of a + rational philosophical basis for its major operations? + Is this like early groping experiments with “animal magnetism,” + or mysterious forms of electricity which brought + results long before an understanding of the reason of their + success was arrived at? However this may be, it still + remains true that, judged by its results, the new method, + however dark and devious, must still be acknowledged + to have attained a success, not sporadic and accidental, + but continuous, consistent and increasing, and apparently, + though incomprehensibly, connected as effect to cause with + the procedure which has been sketched, or shall I say + caricatured, in the foregoing pages.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_12"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page140" title="140"> </a>“THE PUREST OF HUMAN PLEASURES”</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">Top-heavy</span> civilization is always righting itself + by a side-reach after the “primitive” and the + “elemental.” Weary capitalists and professional men + play—expensively—at what when all’s said is but a + child’s game of ball enhanced by feats of walking. Science + gives us the motor; and slug-a-beds who have hitherto + accepted sunrise as an act of faith grow to be connoisseurs + in effects of morning haze and chiaroscuro.</p> + + <p>Perhaps, then, there are many others who, like myself, + have discovered, in this year of the travail of humanity, + the sober and healing pleasures of the garden. Of course + I had always intended to have a garden sometime, on the + same principle by which I hope to see Japan, to read the + Old Testament in Hebrew (having first mastered a dozen + other languages more immediately relevant to my business), + to have my twilight stage of knowledge regarding + the material universe dispelled by the blinding light of + modern discovery. I had even used the planning of this + garden, with its companion brook, grove, and lawn, as a + lure for sleep. But that was a paradise for the eye alone; + and in my heathen blindness I dreamed that the joy of + the garden was in the beholding. Most pityingly I look + back upon that time of ignorance. Confess, fellow + amateurs, is not the joy in the making? Even harvesting, + the end for which the garden was made, yields the gardener + himself a crasser pleasure, as compared with the stirring + of the earth, laying down seeds in a row like a string of + matched stones, and most of all watching the young + plants, obedient to his design, prick through the earth and + advance from seed-leaf to bushiness or stateliness, from + foliage to flower. To gather the fruits of your labor + justifies your enterprise, but it is something like receiving + royalties for a work of art born in a flash of inspiration. + <a class="pagenum" id="page141" title="141"> </a>To see the delicate green shoots, perfect in their vague + promise, and innocent of the blights, distortions, and frustrations + that may overtake them later on, stretching up + and unfolding where the other day there was only black + earth, is akin to the first vision of some great creative + idea, before one meets its penalty in hours of toil and + cheated hope. There is even a tinge of guilt in our pleasure; + we have digressed, in the name of civic duty, from our + lawful callings, considering that we made some sacrifice + of time or strength, and our virtue has turned into an + indulgence.</p> + + <p>One of my first discoveries (after the simplest rudiments + of the art I essayed to practise) was that of all topics on + the lips of men the garden is the most conversable, the + most fraternal. Hitherto, observation had led me to + suppose children and rheumatism the most universal of + interests. Having neither myself, I have been cut off + from that fluent intercourse upon first steps and first + words, adenoids, preventive dentistry, potatoes carried in + the pocket, baths of hot brine, and the proportion of protein + in the diet, which makes strangers or friends akin. + There was always the weather; but—unless one has a + garden, as sensitive as a poet to every nuance of sun or + atmosphere—talk of the weather is a mere subterfuge, a + symbol of our inarticulateness and awkward shyness + masking our human yearning to know our fellows and to + wish them well. The garden, as a subject of discourse, + combines all the pretext offered by the weather to hint + our good will without violating our shyness; all the + diversity and perpetual surprise of a child’s development; + all the right to condole with misfortune and to be agreeably + officious about remedies enjoyed by those who encounter + the rheumatic; all the delight of professional note-comparing + known to invalids, cooks, and pedagogues. To + appear in my garden, equipped with sun-hat and hoe, + was, I found, to be hail-fellowed by every condition of + men—pickaninnies, delivery-men, professors, elegants + <a class="pagenum" id="page142" title="142"> </a>and inelegants, experts and inexperts. My acquaintanceship + among my neighbors grew like Jonah’s gourd. “Do + you mind my asking what that line of white strips is for?” + “To warn the English sparrows off my pea-vines.”—“Would + you like some young cabbage-plants?”—“Your + corn is lookin’ fine!” Common interests were visible and + inexhaustible.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Other sociabilities also I have found in the garden. We + prate a good deal of “companionship with nature,” and + go out fussily to seek it, with camera, bird-book, field-glasses, + and expensive camping gear. In the garden one + loses all this self-consciousness. Instead of personifying + nature, and offering her the compliment of man’s society, + one sinks into one’s place as a piece of nature. The catbird + spluttering joyous music at me, almost forgetting to + be afraid; the cardinal that looks down where I stand + tossing off a magnificent plume of spray from my watering-pot, + and whistles, “We-e-ell! Who’d-have-thought-to-see-you-keeping-at-it?” + and I myself, turning to my own + uses the perpetual need of life to renew itself, to evolve out + of seed and bulb new seeds and bulbs, which shall give + birth in time to other seeds and bulbs—we are all part of + the same process.</p> + + <p>With our Little Brother the Robin I am approaching + intimacy. It is pleasant to see him assume, with almost + human egotism, that the worms I turn up, the strings I + plant by, the stakes I drive, are special providences for + himself. Yet I have never quite won his confidence. I + have often longed to speak to him, explaining that there + are worms enough for us both, and how easy I find it to + scatter a few extra strings for his nest-building; I have + longed to reassure the wild doves who run about on their + pretty pink feet in the long grass near the garden, and at + my approach fly away with a protesting soft “chitter-chitter-chitter.” + I realize afresh, as I have often realized + in watching people coax squirrels to eat from their hands, + <a class="pagenum" id="page143" title="143"> </a>or children lavishing affection on brainless hens and rabbits, + that if there had been no Saint Francis, it behooved + mankind to invent him. On the other hand, the gardener, + a fighter in the struggle for food, finds the impartial views + of the dilettante asking for “companionship with nature” + quite unthinkable. The wild rabbit, which only last + winter I thought an engaging creature, has not changed + the sleekness of his brown coat, his funny little white tuft + of tail, or his wavelike movements; but he has become repulsive + to me.</p> + + <p>A whole new set of values, in fact, takes possession of + mind and senses. One comes to like the writhings of the + angle worms in the muck, knowing that they do the gardener + service. Various sights and contacts, once offensive, + being now considered not simply in themselves, but in + relation to our purposes, become indifferent or actually + pleasurable. Even whiffs of fertilizer, if suggestive merely, + give an agreeable sense that the work is going forward. + And what an infinite gulf between “dirt” and “soil”! + There lies between a whole initiation into secrets chemical + and biological. Once I passed by garden tracts with + undistinguishing eyes. Now to see them stifled with + weeds, or to see the earth stiff and lumpy, affects me like + walking in New York slums, or like a hideous grouping of + colors; to see the earth mellow and finely tilled is satisfying, + like a good chord in music, or like a firm strong + drawing.</p> + + <p>Digging, planting, transplanting, watching the sky, I + have come face to face with the meaning of words I have + known all my life, in the dim way we know most things + outside our own importunate concerns. “Except a corn + of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone.” + It is one thing to understand this saying botanically, and + another to see it exemplified when you are breathlessly + awaiting the result. “An enemy hath done this!” I + cried when the wild rabbit stripped my young bean-plants, + or when some great dog made his bed in my onion-patch. + <a class="pagenum" id="page144" title="144"> </a>All sorts of images, from parable, poem, and story, re-awake + in my mind with a morning freshness and brightness. + And in my turn I have enacted, or experienced, + many a little apologue. For example, I discover that + plants grown in over-shaded spots fall victim no less surely + to what sun they get, on scorching days, than those quite + unprotected. Here are the facts; the moralist may make + of them what he will.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">What would any art be without its disappointments and + anxieties, its hours of depression that measure the worth + of the goal striven for? The amateur gardener has his + share. I pass over in forgiving silence—almost silence—the + haughty fashion in which the masters of the craft, + professing to offer information, so give as to withhold. + Your professional is a thorough classicist; “nothing too + much” his motto. Enough, and not too much, whether + it be vanilla in the cookies, exercise for the invalid, + “corroborative detail” in the narrative, or sunshine, water, + fertilizer, depth of earth, mulching for your plants. And + this all-important but inscrutable rule is the despair of + every amateur. A grievance perhaps more personal to + myself has been the unnatural behavior enjoined on me + toward seedlings of my own sowing, my own cosseting. In + a sense, I had brought them into the world, and now I + was told some of them must be done away with, that the + rest might thrive! As I edged along the rows, unhappily + choosing, among all the pretty youngsters, the victims + for the sacrifice, I reminded myself of Catiline (’tis consoling, + at last to have a use for one’s education); <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">notat et + designat oculis ad caedem unumquemque</em>. Sometimes my + human instinct to value every individual and to lavish + care on the weak has got the better of me. I do not dwell + on the experiments to which I have resorted; but some of + them, in spite of the doctrinaires, were triumphs! On the + other hand, I have bitterly resented deformities and discolorations + in my nursery. For the first time in my life + <a class="pagenum" id="page145" title="145"> </a>I understand how the Spartans could expose for death + infants blemished in mind or body. I understand what + fierce parental pride is at the bottom of many a father’s + or mother’s blindness to faults and commonplaceness.</p> + + <p>On every side I hear from fellow-enthusiasts detailed + schemes for next year’s garden, vows of perpetual gardendom. + I do not echo them. I have been initiated; a certain + bond with my kind is mine henceforth. But the purest + of human pleasures, as Bacon called it, is likewise the + most tyrannous. Other joys may be caught up in Gideon’s + fashion, while one marches on one’s way. Once the garden + possesses you, it leaves no room for anything beside. The + garden-seat of Adam and Eve has been universally regretted. + But what had they to do except name the creatures, + dig, sow, and reap? They did not have to pay their + way with money, nor answer letters, nor read the newspapers, + nor vote, nor keep track of the bacterial count in + the milk they drank, nor study past history in order to + interpret the present, nor even to learn the science of + horticulture.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_13"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page146" title="146"> </a>WAR FOR EVOLUTION’S SAKE</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">In</span> its last throes the cruel Neo-Darwinian philosophy + of nature and man is having one terrible, + final, satanic triumph, for it is in no mean measure responsible + for this incredible war, and especially for its + incredible brutality. For just as the war and the peculiarly + revolting and degrading methods of its conduct + bear the “made in Germany” stamp, so does the Neo-Darwinian + conception of evolution and its method bear + the same precious label. For it was not only that Weismann + of Freiburg gave form and seeming validity to + this conception, during the course of his violent attacks + on Lamarckism, but it was his following troop of German + biologists and natural philosophers who gleefully put the + conception into final form for general assimilation. For, + as we shall explain later, it was a kind of biological philosophy + that fitted in beautifully with German political + and military philosophy; everything to the winner, nothing + to the loser.</p> + + <p>In the evolution of the human race the different peoples + and nations are the analogue of the different species in + lower creation. Just as among these brute species of + field and jungle, ocean and stream, there is a constant + relentless struggle of one species against the other nearest + like it in habits, or nearest it in space, or most in the + way of its increase numerically or expansion geographically, + so is it among the peoples of the earth. And just + as the species with the advantage of longer tooth or claw, + or more ferocity, more endurance, or more cunning, wins + by killing out, or, as among certain ant kinds, enslaving + the other, so is it with these higher brutes, the peoples + of the earth.</p> + + <p>Human evolution is governed by the same factors as + brute evolution, and the all-mighty and all-sufficient + <a class="pagenum" id="page147" title="147"> </a>factor is natural selection on a basis of life and death + struggle and survival of the winner. Therefore the whole + matter is very simple: that people is the chosen of Nature + and God that devotes its best attention and energy + to the business of fighting and fights in the most approved + brute way with complete rejection of all those unnatural, + debilitating and disadvantageous principles that an artificial + and weakening form of social evolution has grafted + on to human life. For this social evolution that the + human species has adopted is based on a principle that + is in direct conflict with nature, the principle of mutual + aid and altruism. Nature’s principle is mutual fight and + antagonism.</p> + + <p>Thus said Weismann and his Neo-Darwinian followers; + and thus quickly repeated the men who saw in this philosophy + exactly the needed foundation and sustaining + pillars for their own militaristic philosophy. In this + fundamental natural philosophy they found exactly what + they needed to give their militarism full acceptance + among the German people; namely, the cold, disinterested + support of science, the potent aid of scientific dogma. + For Science is the German religion. The <em lang="de" xml:lang="de">Gott</em> of the German + Kaiser is a god of steel and power, not of heart and + pity. German success, so far as it goes, and of the kind + it is, comes in truth from <em lang="de" xml:lang="de">Gott und uns</em>; but from their + kind of god and their kind of us.</p> + + <p>I heard the first impressive exposition of this Germanized + Darwinism in a great German University twenty + years ago, and I heard the second impressive exposition + of it only a year ago at the Great Headquarters of the + German General Staff in occupied France. This latter + exposition was well illustrated by the conditions of the + moment—and it was a memorable one for me. Here was + the apparently conquering species, pushing into the land + of the struggling native species; here was the species + longer in tooth and claw, more ferocious and brutal, + more unscrupulous and cunning, apparently winning in + <a class="pagenum" id="page148" title="148"> </a>this biological struggle for existence,—and taking breath + and a few moments to explain why. No wonder we win; + for we are in tune with Nature. We win because we + ought to win for the sake of the future of the human race, + for the sake of its evolution in harmony with natural law.</p> + + <p>But now, in all soberness, what is really to be said of + this German logic; this German philosophy of war and + war methods; this holy justification on a basis of natural + law of everything that seems worst and utterly hopeless to + most of the rest of the world? Let us look at the whole + matter, both the biology and the Germanism, in the light + of freedom from dogma and outraged feeling. Let us look + both at the alleged natural law and the German creature + so camouflaged by it that he deceives himself into believing + that he is really the superman that his philosophy + paints him. For it is quite true that many Germans, + many educated Germans, do believe what they say of + themselves and of their Holy Crusade under the banner + of Natural Law.</p> + + <p>First we can say of this natural law that it isn’t natural + law. Evolution is not all caused and controlled by natural + selection; natural selection is not all based on cruel and extinguishing + struggle; struggle is not all blood and violence. + In a word, Nature is not all red in tooth and claw. + And, finally, human evolution is not all identical with + brute evolution.</p> + + <p>The last score of years has brought us a wonderful new + knowledge of biology. And it has brought us, too, a new + realization of the great deal that we do not know about + biology. The most conspicuous and significant part of + our new positive knowledge has to do with the processes + and results of heredity. The most conspicuous and significant + part of our realization of our lack of knowledge + has to do with the explanation of evolution. And the + two things are intimately connected.</p> + + <p>The time has come when the explanations of evolution + need to be, and can be, looked on in a light free from + <a class="pagenum" id="page149" title="149"> </a>control by dogma. When this is done the hollowness + and the hatefulness of the long reign of the much more + than Darwinian Neo-Darwinism is clear as day.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Let us glance over the history of the doctrine.</p> + + <p>The Greeks had ideas about evolution based less on + known facts than on the visions and promptings of minds + endowed with creative imagination. Yet these ideas + foreshadowed in curiously close approximation the evolution + conceptions, not only of the natural philosophers + of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, to whom + are usually ascribed the first formulations of the evolution + doctrine, but even many of the newer formulations + of the present and just passed centuries.</p> + + <p>Even the essence of Darwin’s famous explanation of + evolution by natural selection is suggested in the expressions + of some of the Attic philosophers. As, for example, + in the writings of Empedocles, who conceived + of a creation of separate animal parts of a great variety + of kinds and the coming together of some of these parts + to form viable organisms and of others to form combinations + unable to persist as successful creatures, because + unfit to meet the demands of natural conditions.</p> + + <p>But it was the great French naturalists, Buffon and + Lamarck, who first expressed the evolution conception + in fully worked out and reasonable form, while it was + Lamarck who first offered a simple and wholly plausible + explanation of evolutionary cause and control. His explanation + remains to-day the simplest and most appealing + to the reasoning mind of any that has been offered.</p> + + <p>Unfortunately it lacked, and still lacks, the necessary + basis of indispensable proof for its most fundamental + assumption, to-wit, “the inheritance of acquired + characters,” that is, the inheritance by the immediate + offspring of those structural and functional changes or + “acquirements” which came to the parents during their + life because of their special use or disuse of parts and + <a class="pagenum" id="page150" title="150"> </a>their individual reactions to environmental conditions. + The young giraffe had a longer neck than it otherwise + would have had because its parents had stretched their + necks by continual reaching up to the leaves on the highest + branches. The young man-thing of Glacial Times + had weaker and less developed scalp muscles because + its parents had gradually given up any considerable use + of these muscles for twitching their heavy shocks of hair + to frighten away the flies.</p> + + <p>Then came Darwin with his natural selection explanation, + a very different explanation from Lamarck’s, and + one also very plausible and logical. Darwin did not altogether + disbelieve in Lamarck’s theory; but he believed + much more in his own. Later came the Neo-Darwinians, + and they went the whole way of rejecting Lamarck’s + explanation entirely, and accepting the natural selection + explanation as the wholly sufficient cause and the only one + needed to explain all evolution. The leader of the Neo-Darwinians + was August Weismann of the University of + Freiburg. He had as followers most of the German natural + philosophers.</p> + + <p>What is this “natural selection” that we all know so + well by name, and so little, I am afraid, by content? For + natural selection is much more widely known as a dominating + scientific dogma, accepted popularly with little + question as a sufficient explanation of evolution, than as + something to be itself explained and viewed with a proper + scientific doubt. As a matter of fact, it is high time that + it should be generally known that not many naturalists + of standing today accept natural selection as a sufficient + explanation of the thoroughly accepted fact of evolution, + or even as the most important among the numerous + probable contributing factors of evolution. Indeed there + are many reputable naturalists who repudiate natural + selection altogether, as an actual contributing factor in + species-forming and descent, and concede its influence as + an evolutionary control, only in most general relations.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page151" title="151"> </a>But in the popularization and wide acceptance of the + natural selection dogma, we are in face of one of those + familiar histories of the rise and dominance of a plausible, + logically-constructed, apparently simple and sufficient + explanation of a great problem pressing for solution. It + is difficult for the world to accept the evolution theory + without a causal explanation of it. But as the known + facts prove the theory beyond reasonable doubt, it is + necessary to accept it. Hence there is to most people a + simultaneous necessity for accepting some explanation + of it. Natural selection has had the fortune of being, + since Darwin’s time, the generally accepted explanation. + What then is it, really?</p> + + <p>It is an explanation of evolution which it is the merit + of Darwin to have devised;—or perhaps we ought already + to say in the light of the fatal results brought about + by the wide unreasoning acceptance of it, it is the demerit + of Darwin to have devised;—an explanation based + partly on certain observed facts, but more largely on a + certain logical elaboration of argument for which the + observed facts are assumed to be sufficient base.</p> + + <p>The more relevant of these facts are the production + by parents of too many young and the slight differing of + these young among themselves in most of their characters, + physical and mental. The production of too many + young leads, according to the natural selectionists, to a + life and death struggle for existence among them, and + the slight differences among them lead to a decision in + this struggle on a basis of the slight advantages or disadvantages + of these differences. The two logical conclusions + seem to be inevitable on the basis of the two + facts.</p> + + <p>On the structure so far reared, however, other blocks + are placed. The selectionists believe that by the laws + of heredity, although the young of a different parent or + pair of parents do differ among themselves, they resemble + their own parents more closely than they resemble other + <a class="pagenum" id="page152" title="152"> </a>individuals of their kind of species. So that the young + produced by the survivors in the struggle for existence, + although again slightly differing from their parents + and each other, will, by the laws of heredity, tend to reproduce + in their make-up the advantageous variations + which were possessed by their parents and which gave + these parents success in the struggle for life.</p> + + <p>More than that: some of these young will tend to + possess those advantageous differences—this by the + laws of variation as antidote needed just here for the laws + of heredity—in even more marked degree than existed + in the parents, while others will possess them in less degree + and still others in about the same degree. Hence, + the particular young showing the increased differences + will be the individuals of this generation to survive in + the struggle. These will then leave behind them new + young again tending to possess in varying degree those + advantageous variations from the old or species type + that make them especially “fit for the conditions under + which they must live.”</p> + + <p>Thus there will result, in a series of many generations, + a gradual shifting of the character of the species to the + type characterized by an ever increasing and perfecting + of the original advantageous differences. This is “species + transformation,” or the “origin of species” by natural + selection. It is evolution on a basis of life and death + struggle; extinction of the unfit; and survival of the fit, + fitter or fittest. And just as with the different individuals + inside the species, so with the different varying species. + Each struggles with the other and the one or ones + with the advantageous differences win at the expense of + the others.</p> + + <p>There is no doubt of the fascinating plausibility and + seeming reality and sufficiency of this explanation. It + makes a strong appeal to the logical mind; to the theory-spinning + brain. You can understand it, prove it, expand + it, improve on it, and, all this almost without ever seeing + <a class="pagenum" id="page153" title="153"> </a>an animal or a plant, or knowing anything of its actual + life and relations to the world it lives in. No wonder it + fascinated and seized a world demanding a logical explanation + for the theory of evolution. No wonder that + this explanation of Darwin, offered at the same time with + a clear elucidation of the evolution theory itself to a world + just ready for both, came to be the one all-sufficient explanation, + came to be a scientific dogma of the most dogmatic + type.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Now for real thorough-going dogmatism there is nothing + like scientific dogmatism, there is no dogmatist like + a scientific dogmatist. There are many scientific men + who pretend to know absolutely that many things cannot + possibly be because they have never seen them, heard + them, felt them or measured them. It is because of these + men, who are not many, but loud, that we scientific men + as a class have a reputation among many people of being + narrow-minded and bigoted; and I hasten to admit that + many of us are. Not all that is called science is proved; + and most certainly not all that is called non-science is disproved, + or because as yet unproved is to be tossed lightly + or sneeringly aside. The scientific man who declares what + cannot possibly be, exposes himself as a boaster and a + charlatan, for by such declaration he, by implication, + claims to know all the order of nature, which certainly + no man does know. No man knows all that is or may be; + hence no man knows what is not or may not be.</p> + + <p>It was Weismann’s new facts and new theories about + heredity that did much to overthrow Lamarckism and + make it possible to expand rational Darwinism into irrational + ultra-Darwinism and then claim for it such an + insolently dominating place among the explanations of + evolution. And now it is the still newer and far less theoretical + and more concrete knowledge of heredity that + has dethroned Neo-Darwinism, made impossible and absurd + the German claims of the <em lang="de" xml:lang="de">Allmacht</em> of natural selection + <a class="pagenum" id="page154" title="154"> </a>as evolution explanation, and revealed to us how + little we really know of the potent causes and controls of + evolution—if we may call that revelation which reveals + darkness where before was apparent light. The factors + of evolution that today we are more certain of than any + others are the unknown factors, the causes we do not + know, the methods we do not understand.</p> + + <p>If this seems to be a humiliating confession to come + from a biologist and professed student of evolution, it is + one in which all honest scholars must join. If the Germans + will not, they are not honest.</p> + + <p>The new heredity, to characterize by this term the extraordinary + increase and the more exact kind of knowledge + of heredity acquired since the first recognition, in + 1900, of Mendelism, has so shattered the seemingly unassailable + logical structure of the natural selection explanation + of evolution that it stands now only as a tottering + skeleton of its once imposing self. It had always too + much assumption of premises for its foundation and too + much logic and finespun theory in its superstructure to + be an enduring building. Even before the new knowledge + of the facts and mechanism of heredity was available natural + selection was already weakening under the criticism + of scientific men, although but little of this was known + to the man in the street. And even now when the new + heredity has furnished the knowledge for a complete undermining + of the natural selection theory as a species-forming + factor, only occasional rumors of the disaster find + their way into popular literature.</p> + + <p>But long ago there began a popular revolt against the + conception of the whole world of nature and man as ruled + by a theory of continuous ruthless bloody struggle. + Everyone knew that this was not the only relation of human + beings to each other, and even most casual observation + indicated that it was not the only relation of various + kinds of the lower animals to each other. The obvious biological + success of the social or communal insects, the + <a class="pagenum" id="page155" title="155"> </a>numerous instances of commensalism, or the living together + on terms of mutual advantage of individuals of + different species—the various ants alone have more than + a thousand known kinds of other insects living with + them—and the innumerable observed instances of what + might be called balanced adaptations, such as those of + the flower-visiting insects and the insect-visited flowers + resulting in the needed cross-fertilization of the flowers + and the needed supply of nectar and pollen food for the + insects—all these had convinced biologists and nature-students + and just nature-lovers that <em>if</em> natural selection + were the all-ruling factor in determining the present character + and the future of the living world it was a very different + natural selection from that so redly painted by the + Neo-Darwinians.</p> + + <p>It is quite certain that Darwin himself never conceived + of any such utterly brutal conception of natural selection + as the Teutonized one. In all his writing he recognizes + that the bringing about of adaptation to the conditions + of life is the essential feature of evolution, and, when it + seemed impossible or too far-fetched to explain adaptation + by a ruthless struggle that extinguished some species + and preserved others, he looked for other explanations, + even accepting Lamarck’s for certain cases. He accepted + everything that could make for adaptation, and among + these other things than bitter fighting that could bring + about and perfect adaptation he especially recognized + mutual aid, and repeatedly called attention to species + change based on mutual aid both within and between + species.</p> + + <p>But however suggestive and important it is to note + how out of tune with the facts concerned with general + evolution are the natural selection extremists, our special + present interest centers around the attempt to bring the + explanation of human evolution into tune with this out of + tune conception of evolution in general. For it is on this + basis, the basis of an alleged identity between the character + <a class="pagenum" id="page156" title="156"> </a>and control of human evolution and the character + and control of brute evolution, that the Germans find + their justification in natural law for their war philosophy + and war practise.</p> + + <p>The Germans are greatly given to explanations. These + explanations always contain a specious show of reasoning + and pseudo-reasoning. They are in line with some accepted + philosophy or pseudo-philosophy. Their accepted + pseudo-philosophy of human evolution is a thoroughly + mechanistic one. It is one of economy of thought and + argument. If man is an animal descended, or ascended, + from the lower ones—as he is—and if animals are what + they are today and will be what they will be tomorrow by + virtue—or evil—of a natural law of bitter, brutal, + bloody struggle, out of which emerge as survivors only + those most brutally and fearfully qualified for such + struggle, why, then, the case of man and of human evolution + is simple. <em lang="de" xml:lang="de">Schluss</em> with discussion!</p> + + <p>But the trouble with this simple convincing argument + is with the premises. They are wrong.</p> + + <p>Not only is bitter, brutal, bloody struggle not the + single, nor the chief explanation of general evolution, but + it is particularly not the chief explanation of human evolution, + despite our origin and earlier life in Glacial or pre-Glacial + Time as “animal among animals,” and despite + the stream of ever more diluted inheritance from tiger + and ape ancestors that flows with us, as we move through + the ages, changing, ever-changing, as we move. The + simplicity of the explanation of human nature and human + life from origins makes its appeal to all of us, and + especially to those de-spiritualized ones of us who find + in pure mechanistic conceptions a satisfying and ultra-economical + explanation of every complex and difficult + problem. But it is a dangerous explanation, leading us + to be blind to many facts that are, if we are honest in our + seeing, quite clearly before us. No matter when or where + we may have begun the course of our truly human evolution + <a class="pagenum" id="page157" title="157"> </a>we have come an immensely long way, a way so long + that we have, we may say, almost no right at all to try + to interpret our condition of today by the light of our + condition in the beginning. And we have come to this + point by the interjection into our nature by natural mutation, + or conscious self-effort, of elements that were essentially + foreign to our ancestors of the beginning days. + We have, indeed, in our evolution a sort of double line; + one that we may call our natural evolution, concerned + with our physical characteristics and the fundamentals + of our mental and social traits, and like all natural characters + carried along in the race by heredity; and the other, + that we may call our social or moral evolution, made possible, + to be sure, only by the stage of our natural evolution, + but concerned chiefly with various acquired mental + and social characters, which are not an integral part + of our heredity, but depend on speech, writing, education, + precept and practise for transmission from one generation + to the other, and, thus, for perpetuation and expansion + in the race.</p> + + <p>This social evolution, added to a natural evolutionary + development of the social or altruistic habit based on the + advantage of the mutual aid principle as opposed to the + mutual fight principle, has had an amazingly swift flowering + since the earlier days of human prehistory, and today + contains all the present expression and future promise of + man’s higher evolution. It has its roots in all of the best + of man’s natural traits, and acts as a powerful inhibitor + of the worst of them. It finds its natural validity in the + great strength it adds to man’s position in Nature, for it + permits a much swifter and more extreme development + of human possibilities than would be possible by the slow + processes of natural evolution. That which would take + many generations to incorporate into our natural heredity + can be put quickly into our social inheritance and still + be hardly any the less powerful in its control of our life.</p> + + <p>Now it is all this side of human evolution that the German + <a class="pagenum" id="page158" title="158"> </a>natural philosophy, especially as applied to international + relations, leaves out of account. The Germans + do indeed recognize the value of social evolution inside + the race or nation, but its advantage is all for the sake of + building up a powerful organism to fight effectively and + viciously with all other races and nations. The different + peoples are to be looked on as the analogues of different + brute species, all terribly and everlastingly at war with + each other, each using everything possible to it to gain + the upper hand. Everything that can be construed to + be of military advantage in this struggle is justified as + biological advantage, and there is no doubt that to be inhumanly + ferocious, brutal and cunning is of biological + advantage in tiger evolution.</p> + + <p>The test of this war philosophy will come for the Germans + when they are being beaten and are beaten. Will + they hold then consistently to their thesis, and admit + that their line of human evolution is proved by their defeat + to be a wrong line because it is not the strongest line? + They have a way out. This way was suggested to me by + the principal expositor at Great Headquarters of the + brute struggle and survival theory. He said that it was + possible to conceive of a failure of natural selection to + work its ennobling way because of the perverse opposition + to it of the artificial character of much of human life, + but if natural law was to be restrained or upset by such + an interpolated artificial control he, at least, would prefer + to die in the catastrophe and not have to live in a world + perverse to natural law. Of course he did not admit of + the probability of such a situation. The Germans would + win because they were fighting with Nature on their side. + They were biologically right, and biological law would + work with them to success. But there was the bare possibility + of such an outcome to be reckoned with. If this + possibility came to reality, why then all was wrong with + the world, and he, for one, would not care to live longer + in it.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page159" title="159"> </a>I do not mean to say that all Germans think out war + in terms of biological struggle and evolutionary advancement + of the human race. But there are many who do, + and they are leaders. Now, in Germany leaders not only + lead; they compel. Most Germans not only do as they + are told to do; they think as they are told to think. Their + whole training and tradition is to put themselves unreservedly + in the hands of their masters. And as long as + things go well, or fairly well, or even not very well but + with promise of going better, they make little complaint. + But when things are too hard for too long a time, they + begin to question the infallibility of the All-Highest and + the Near-Highest. And Germany already has suffered + terribly and suffered long, and still suffers.</p> + + <p>The German leaders are feverishly longing and working + for an end of this war. They see more danger from + within than from the outside. The Allies have declared + that they do not expect to destroy or dismember Germany + but the little people of Germany have not said what they + will or will not do. They will not do anything if an end + of the war can be made soon with some positive gain to + be shown, or apparently shown, from it. But there is no + telling what they will do otherwise, do, that is, to the men + who have sacrificed them in vain.</p> + + <p>But they are a long-suffering people, and a philosophizing + people who have been taught that they are the + race chosen of God and Nature, and that the inevitable + course of natural evolution is carrying them on to be the + Super-race of all earth. This philosophy will go a long + way with them, and whether all the shrewd, calculating, + self-seeking men of the Court and the General Staff believe + it or not, it is a most useful philosophy for them. It + puts all those who do believe it in their hands. And as + I have said, many Germans do believe it. That is the + great danger of the world from the Germans; so many of + them believe what they say.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_14"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page160" title="160"> </a>JOHN FISKE</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">A generation</span> with every nerve strained by the + war will probably have little patience with a statement + that the generation whose activities began soon after + the middle of the last century, went through a conflict of + perhaps equal importance, but such is the fact.</p> + + <p>Like the present conflict, that was one between an old + and firmly rooted principle that had outlived most of its + usefulness and was fettering liberty, and a new principle + that meant emancipation.</p> + + <p>The contest was between the superstition (it was not + consistent enough to justify calling it an opinion) on the + one hand that man has fallen from a condition of primitive + perfection to one of degradation, and on the other + hand, the scientific demonstration that man’s experience + has been one of virtually constant progress, up from protoplasm + and probably from inorganic matter. On the + former view hung the mass of putrescent and pestilent + dogma that had fastened itself upon the sweet and simple + teachings of Christ.</p> + + <p>The conflict was probably the greatest of all between + truth and superstition. The temper of it was perhaps + most strikingly illustrated when, at the meeting of the + British Association in 1860, Bishop Wilberforce asked + Huxley whether it was “through his grandfather or his + grandmother that he claimed descent from a monkey,” + and Huxley answered:</p> + + <p>“I asserted—and I repeat—that a man has no reason + to be ashamed of having an ape for his grandfather. + If there were an ancestor whom I should feel shame in recalling, + it would rather be a man—a man of restless and + versatile intellect—who not content with success in his + own sphere of activity, plunges into scientific questions + with which he has no real acquaintance, only to obscure + <a class="pagenum" id="page161" title="161"> </a>by an aimless rhetoric, and distract the attention of his + hearers from the real point at issue by eloquent digressions + and skilled appeals to religious prejudice.”</p> + + <p>A witness says: “The effect was tremendous. One lady + fainted and had to be carried out; I, for one jumped from + my seat.”</p> + + <p>Another witness says: “I never saw such a display + of fierce party spirit,” and speaks of “the looks of + bitter hatred” cast upon those who were on Huxley’s + side.</p> + + <p>Perhaps it is not trying to shape great complexities too + definitely, to say that the conflict of which that was one episode, + was the third of the civilized world’s greatest intellectual + struggles—the establishment of the Christian + church, the reformation of it, and the determination of + its true relation to the progress of knowledge.</p> + + <p>The last conflict, however, was a most hopeful illustration + of the progress made since the first two, in that it + involved no exposure of victims to the lions of the arena, + no Nero’s torches, no Inquisition, no Thirty-Years’ War, + no destruction of venerable and beautiful monuments, or + of institutions for charity or education.</p> + + <p>But of course that conflict of the last century, like all + others, had its pains; yet as it did not directly touch the + person or the pocket of the average man, he cared very + little about it. Nevertheless it has filtered down into his + very language, and when he is the sort of average man who + likes to use big words, his share of the victors’ spoils includes + the pleasure of frequently uttering, without quite + understanding, such terms as <em>environment</em>, <em>differentiation</em>, + and even <em>integration</em>, while the word <em>evolution</em> has become + such a matter-of-course term that he and everybody + else use it unconsciously—unconscious not only of most + of what it implies, but even of their indebtedness to the + men from whom they got it.<span id="footnote2" class="fnmarker">*</span> <span class="footnote">* In this connection there was something said about Herbert Spencer in our + Number 16.</span></p> + + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page162" title="162"> </a>Of those men, one of the most important, and far the + most important in America, was John Fiske. The recent + publication of his <cite>Life and Letters, by John S. Clarke</cite>, + (Houghton-Mifflin Co.) gives occasion to say something + about him and his part in the great conflict.</p> + + <p>But first a word regarding the book. It is certainly + a remarkable production for a man well over eighty. + Though not entirely free from the diffuseness and repetition + of age, it is nearer free than many respectable books + of much younger men, while in faithfulness, patience and, + on the whole, discrimination, it surpasses most. The author + really understands the implications of Evolution, so + far as yet worked out, and that is something that surprisingly + few people do; and there are not a few places + where he states them with a clearness and vigor which + would do credit to anybody, and in a man of his years + are no less than astonishing. Whatever imperfections + the book may have, as a guide for the layman to the + great revolution in thought which brought thought for the + first time into stable equilibrium, the book is probably + surpassed by no writing except Fiske’s own.</p> + + <p>But while the author’s work is not to be estimated + lightly, he would be the first to say that the charm and + value of the book are mainly in Fiske’s letters, especially + those to his wife and mother, which in naturalness, vividness, + beauty of expression and humor are unsurpassed, + and in wealth and ease of illustrative learning are unequaled, + by any letters of which we know. For readers + fond of books of travel, many of them will be of the very + highest interest. Moreover they include a fine portrait gallery + of the greatest men who won the fight for Evolution, at + play as well as at work; and the letters to and from Darwin, + Spencer, and a few others are rich in discussion of the profoundest + topics that have engaged the human mind. In + short, we know of no other book which admits the reader + to as much intimacy with as high society. Jenkins would + not agree with our terms, but if high society means the + <a class="pagenum" id="page163" title="163"> </a>men who made the greatest intellectual epoch in human + history, our assertion is safe. Fiske himself had no small + part in that great feat, and this book admits us into his + intimate friendship with Lyell, Lewes, George Eliot, Tyndall, + Huxley, Darwin, Spencer and not a few others among + the leaders of the race. It seems quite probable that this + life of Fiske may give a clearer idea of Spencer than is + given in Mr. Duncan’s <cite>Life</cite>, or even in the <cite>Autobiography</cite>. + Perhaps best of all, Fiske’s letters set before us as example + a character of rare simplicity, sincerity and tenderness.</p> + + <p>Lest all this praise lead some to disappointment, we + hasten to add the obvious fact that the attractions of + cotemporary history or even of portable epigram, which + have made most of the immortal letters in literature, + are hardly to be expected from a writer whose mind + was generally absorbed in the widest generalizations of + Philosophy and the History of the past.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">And now as to the life itself:</p> + + <p>Edmund Fisk Green, later famous as John Fiske, was + born of excellent New England stock at Hartford, Connecticut, + on March 30, 1842. His mother was early + widowed, and went to New York to teach, leaving her + son with her mother in Middletown. When he was thirteen, + his mother married in New York, and this change + in her surname probably has something to do with the + change in his, to that originally borne by the grandmother + with whom he continued to live. The grandmother’s + father, John Fisk, was a remarkable man, and so his + Christian name went with the surname.</p> + + <p>The young John Fiske (the <em>e</em> was his own addition when + he found that it had been used by his earlier ancestors) + was precocious, as, despite many assertions to the contrary, + great scholars and geniuses generally have been; + but unlike Mill and Spencer—the cotemporaries he + nearest resembled—Fiske had not the benefit in his early + education of any exceptionally competent guide. From + <a class="pagenum" id="page164" title="164"> </a>childhood up, however, he stood out from his companions.</p> + + <p>He had the usual schooling, interspersed with some + special tutoring, and during two considerable intervals + he pursued his studies unaided. All the while that his + formal studies were going on, he read ravenously, and, + from a very early age, only things worth reading. Thus + in childhood he began the accumulation of what became a + very exceptional private library.</p> + + <p>When Fiske was fourteen, he joined the Congregational + Church in Middletown, and for a time he was very religious + indeed, taking an active part in the wave of “revival” + which swept over the country two years later, in + 1858. But early in 1859 he was reading Gibbon, Grote, + Humboldt, and Buckle, and questioning the dogmas of + Christianity, and quite probably was going through the reaction + from the “revival,” which, throughout the country, + was about as great as the revival itself; and it was not + long before Fiske abandoned the dogmas altogether. But + his reverence for all in the religion that was worth the + attention of a reasoning being, never left him; and through + life he even used its terminology to a degree that was sometimes + hardly consistent with his fundamental convictions. + He became also far the most effective builder yet known + of the new religious superstructure legitimately based on + the philosophy which, at about the time we speak of, was + removing from many minds the traditional bases of religion.</p> + + <p>Fiske’s infidelity led to his social ostracism in Middletown, + but forty years later, the place had so far advanced + that when it celebrated the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary + of its foundation, it invited Fiske to be the orator + of the occasion.</p> + + <p>In 1860 he entered Harvard.</p> + + <p>Later, of Darwin he said: “There is now and then a + mind—perhaps one in four or five millions—which in + early youth thinks the thoughts of mature manhood.” + <a class="pagenum" id="page165" title="165"> </a>Such a mind was emphatically Fiske’s own: while he was + still an undergraduate, two of his essays attracted attention + on both sides of the water.</p> + + <p>In college his marks in Philosophy were low: he knew + more than his teachers did, and differed with them, and + probably with his textbooks.</p> + + <p>He was threatened with expulsion from college for + disseminating among the students seditious ideas, including + the doctrine of Evolution. Eight years later he + was invited to expound the same ideas in a course of + lectures in one of the chapels of the university.</p> + + <p>A third instance of the revolution in opinion which + marked the last century was the refusal, in 1872, because + of Fiske’s unorthodoxy, to invite him to lecture + at the Lowell Institute, which was followed less than + twenty years later by invitations to do it. Then the demand + for seats was so great that the evening lectures had + to be repeated in subsequent afternoons.</p> + + <p>After graduation, Fiske studied law, did two years’ + work in nine months, passed a triumphant examination, + and was admitted to the Bar. But after waiting for clients + two years, during which he read more, in quantity and + quality, than most fairly studious men read in a lifetime, + and wrote several notable essays, he gave up law for the + pursuits in which he was already eminent.</p> + + <p>But though he gave up the law, nearly eighteen years + later he could write thus to his wife (<cite>Life and Letters</cite>, II, + p. 205):</p> + + <p>“Judge Gantt thought he would stick me, and so propounded + to me the barbarous law-Latin puzzle propounded + by Sir Thomas More to a learned jurist at Amsterdam, + ‘whether a plough taken <em>in withernam</em> can be replevied?’ + Didn’t stick Hezekiah [The author does not give us the + origin of this nickname] <em>not much</em>. I gave him a minute + account of the ancient process of distraining and impounding + and of the action of replevin,—considerably + to my own amusement and his astonishment.”</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page166" title="166"> </a>The conceptions of the Universe generally held at the + time when Fiske was in college were fragmentary and + chaotic, each phenomenon or each group of phenomena + being, like language, a special creation of an anthropomorphic + God, turning out different jobs piecemeal like a man. + The conception of one power behind all had been a dream + of not a few philosophers and poets, but as a fact comprehensible + by the average mind, it was not known until + the discovery of the Conservation of Force about 1860. + About the same time was discovered the unity of all organic + life, in its descent from protoplasm, and the identity + of its forces with those of the inorganic universe. The + nebular cosmogony, the persistence of force and the + biologic genesis, united together, showed the power + evolving, sustaining and carrying on the entire universe + known to us, to be <em>one</em>, and constantly acting in + unified process; and that every detail—from the most + minute known to the chemist, physicist and biologist, up + to the greatest known to the geologist and astronomer, + and including all known to the psychologist, economist, + and historian—was caused by a previous detail. It having + been established that the same causes always produced + the same results, these uniformities were recognized as + Laws, and it was also recognized that conduct in conformity + with these laws produced good, and conduct + counter to them produced evil.</p> + + <p>It became plain, too, to all normal minds, that the only + conceivable object of these processes was the production + of happiness, and that all records of them proved that they + tend not only to produce happiness, but to increase it.</p> + + <p>These facts rendered entirely superfluous all the previous + imaginings of anthropomorphic deities issuing commands, + to obey which was good, and to disobey which was + bad. For all that, was substituted a beneficent Power transcending + man’s complete comprehension, but with infinitely + greater claims to gratitude and reverence, and sanctions for + morality infinitely more intelligible and authoritative.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page167" title="167"> </a>These great discoveries were at once grasped by Fiske’s + great intelligence, and welcomed with enthusiasm. To + their dissemination he mainly devoted his next twenty + years, and to their illustration in the origins and foundation + of our national commonwealth, the rest of his career.</p> + + <p>In explanation of this ordering of his interests, he said + that he always had had a predilection for History, but + that a man who needs a philosophy must get it fixed before + he can properly do anything else. It is to be presumed, + however, that he was also attracted to Philosophy + by the fight for Evolution, by his intimacy with Youmans + and Spencer, and perhaps most of all, by the appeal to a + mind that, in spite of his enjoyment of the good things of + life, was at bottom profoundly religious. All this involved + his strong conviction of the need of building up the religious + implications of Evolution, to take the place of the old + sanctions which, in many minds, Evolution had set aside.</p> + + <p>Fiske also contributed one generalization to our knowledge + of biologic evolution, and that is a good deal for any + man to do: many have attained fame for less. It was a + generalization so important that Darwin regretted not + having developed it himself. The contribution was, as + most of our readers know, regarding the effect of long infancy + upon psychic, and hence upon social, development. + The reasons, when suggested, are as obvious as Columbus’s + egg: they are, of course, the aid to the evolution + of the family and of altruism.</p> + + <p>When, after Fiske had done his best on these themes, + and Evolution in History became the study of his life, in + that work he was a pioneer, and probably as well fitted + for it as any man that ever lived. His cutting off in the + midst of his plans, before he was sixty, was one of those + disasters and apparent wastes which are among the great + puzzles of the Universe.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Nowadays the man in the street would expect that in + Ireland the frequency of marriage would vary inversely + <a class="pagenum" id="page168" title="168"> </a>with the price of potatoes, and the frequency of illegitimacy + would vary directly with it,—that in France, or + anywhere else, the ratio of unstamped letters dropped into + the boxes, to those duly stamped, would be the same year + in and year out; in other words, that the conduct of men + in general is regulated by environment and determined by + law. But when Fiske was in college, and these ideas were + new, as far as anything can be new, and when Buckle + brought out a book full of them and their supporting + facts, they appealed at once to Fiske’s exceptional powers + of correlation—of tracing order in the history he had + been reading, and in the life he was beginning intelligently + to observe. The precocious boy’s enthusiasm was greatly + stirred, and yet his critical faculty did not lose its discrimination. + He wrote an essay on Buckle which was + praised by the best judges in England; and when Spencer + came along sweeping all these ideas into the one colossal + generalization of Evolution, Fiske was wild with delight. + His own studies of language had been wide enough to + enable him to apply to it the new generalization, and he + wrote an essay on <cite>The Evolution of Language</cite> which increased + the effect of his Buckle essay on both sides of the + Atlantic, and received the commendation of several leading + men, including Spencer himself. How much in advance + of the age these ideas then were, is well illustrated + by the fact that somewhere about 1860, some of the authorities + at Yale actually set the students, who were not + Fiske’s, as a theme for discussion: “Is language of divine or + human origin?” This theme was not set by Whitney: he + already knew better, and was very much out of gear with + Yale because of the knowledge, though as far as his colleagues + were concerned, he kept his out-of-gearness to + himself.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Fiske was never absorbingly interested in the specific + problems of the elevation of the less fortunate portion of + mankind, but the wider philosophic and historic problems + <a class="pagenum" id="page169" title="169"> </a>to which he was devoted include those specific ones. The + widest of all, of course, is Evolution, and probably he did + more to diffuse a knowledge of that than any man of his + time except its two greatest discoverers. Had he lived + to apply, as he proposed, the all-comprehending law to + the history of our nation from the time it became one at + Washington’s inauguration, his help in the perplexities + which now, next to the war, most beset us, would have + been invaluable. But what he did live to accomplish is of + a value that probably none of us can realize, and not many + even suspect.</p> + + <p>The fundamental policy indicated by the law of Evolution + is: Build on what you have. Next to the family, the + one institution on which civilization rests is the right of + private property—the opportunity of every man to + obtain and hold it. The growth of this right made the + advance from slavery and feudalism. Owing to the great + difference in men’s capacities, its present most marked + attainment is capitalism, but with the gradual development + of men’s capacities, especially as promoted by the + spread of education, capitalism seems destined to evolve + into coöperation, of which the germs are already manifest + in the savings-banks and stock companies, especially the + avowedly coöperative companies whose special development + has been in England. The only legitimate and permanent + source of private property is production. The robbery + of Russian landholders or American manufacturers + to confer the semblance of property rights on the incapable, + is not evolution, and can have no permanent results. + In all such proceedings, the property has soon disappeared, + or found its way back to the capable. Such processes are + catastrophic: the only successful ones have been evolutionary. + The general realization of this would probably + do more to settle the irrepressible conflict between the + haves and the have-nots than any other purely intellectual + agency now within sight. While the word Evolution + is on everybody’s tongue, men whose thinking is saturated + <a class="pagenum" id="page170" title="170"> </a>through and through by a realization of the law, do not + abound. If they did, there would not be so many Bolsheviks, + and Russia would still be in her place with the + allies.</p> + + <p>One of the most important causes of the war which + Germany is waging against civilization, is her imperfect + grasp of the philosophy of Evolution, and one reason for + her imperfect grasp is the scarcity of men like Fiske. The + doctrine that the fittest should and must survive is sound. + Germany’s doctrine that she is the fittest, is not: for it + makes the tests of fitness brute force, cunning and unscrupulousness, + and ignores the fact that the course of Evolution + has brought into the world such forces as love of + justice, sympathy, the coöperative spirit, and altruism. + Whether these qualities are yet so far evolved as to be the + fittest to survive, is being tested by the conflict now going + on. If Germany proves herself fittest to survive, it will + be proved only that although the other qualities control + in many advanced places, the time for the world’s control + by them is not yet come. If the Allies conquer, it + will be proved that that time is already here.</p> + + <p>In a rough way it may be said that Spencer, in restricting + himself to demonstrating so much of evolution as could + be expressed in terms of Matter and Motion, left open too + much opportunity for the German conception that evolution + stops at the point where those terms stop; and it can + be said, with equally rough justice, that the philosopher + who, up to this time, has traced the law farthest beyond + that point, was Fiske.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Spencer said in a letter to Fiske, February 2, 1870 + (<cite>Life</cite>, I, 368. The italics are apparently the biographer’s. + We condense a little.):</p> + + <p>“The deanthropomorphization of men’s conceptions has + never occupied any conspicuous or distinctive place in + my own mind—<em>they have been all along quite secondary to + the grand doctrine of Evolution from a physical point of view</em>. + <a class="pagenum" id="page171" title="171"> </a>As I originally conceived it, ‘First Principles’ was what + now forms its second part. I subsequently saw the need + for Part I (The Unknowable) <em>simply for the purpose of + guarding myself against the charges of atheism and materialism</em>. + I consider it [‘The Synthetic Philosophy’] as + essentially a Cosmogony that admits of being worked out + in physical terms, without necessarily entering upon any + metaphysical questions, and without committing myself + to any particular form of philosophy commonly so called. + My <em>sole original purpose</em> was the interpretation of all + concrete phenomena in terms of Matter and Motion, and + I regard all other purposes as incidental and secondary.”</p> + + <p>Spencer would not go out of reach of experiment—at + least collateral experiment, but Fiske went into intuition + freely. Spencer avoided the labyrinth altogether, Fiske + went into it boldly, but always kept within reach of the + clue of experience.</p> + + <p>But those who do not already know the contrary, should + not infer from this that Spencer ignored the field of Ethics. + Quite the reverse: he made probably the most important + scientific contributions to that field yet made, in + tracing the evolution of the conduct of sentient beings + from its first manifestations in reflex action, in the avoidance + of danger, and the procuring of food, through the + seeking of mates, the care of offspring, the forming of + groups, up to the highest development of personal and + social relations and the moralities therein involved.</p> + + <p>But for one person who has read Spencer’s <cite>Ethics</cite>, a + hundred, probably a thousand, have read his work in the + unmoral fields, and tens of thousands have their ideas of + Evolution restricted to the fields explored by Darwin and + Hæckel, and in those fields it is the brute and the Prussian + that survive. But civilization grows in other fields.</p> + + <p>Although Fiske was as thoroughly convinced of Evolution + as Spencer was, he did not stop at its demonstration + within the limits which Spencer imposed upon himself, + but followed it into the fields of the spirit, as illustrated + <a class="pagenum" id="page172" title="172"> </a>by the titles of some of his essays: <cite>The Idea of God</cite>, + <cite>Through Nature to God</cite>, <cite>Life Everlasting</cite>, <cite>The Origin of + Evil</cite>, <cite>The Unseen World</cite>.</p> + + <p>When, in the fifties and sixties, Science abolished the + anthropomorphic limitations of the Creator, it did not + stop there, but abolished, for the time being, <em>all</em> the anthropomorphic + qualities, including those that have not + necessarily any limitations at all. While the universe, + despite frequent inadequacy, disproportion and catastrophe, + still abounds in obvious beauty and happiness, + Science for a time shut its eyes to beneficence, and denied + benevolence and even purpose. Fiske did more than anybody + else has yet done to restore them—to show that + they are corollaries of Evolution. He said, in his <cite>Cosmic + Philosophy</cite>: “The process of evolution is itself the working + out of a mighty Teleology of which our finite understandings + can fathom but the scantest rudiments.” He did + more just there than any modern philosopher, perhaps + than any philosopher, to show that this teleology is beneficent, + and so to restore the attitude of mind which it may + not yet be too late to call Faith in God and Immortality.</p> + + <p>This attitude of mind, however, has received some impetus + from new phenomena now open to Psychical Research, + but hardly yet as much new impetus as the old + one Fiske gave it with more limited materials.</p> + + <p>The following passages indicate in brief what Fiske gave + at length in his <cite>Idea of God</cite>, <cite>Destiny of Man</cite>, <cite>Origin of Evil</cite> + and kindred writings. Contrast them with the quotation + from Spencer a page or two back: This is the closing + passage of <cite>The Unseen World</cite>.</p> + + <p>“We must think with the symbols with which experience + has furnished us; and when we so think, there does + seem to be little that is even intellectually satisfying in + the awful picture which science shows us, of giant worlds + concentrating out of nebulous vapour, developing with + prodigious waste of energy into theatres of all that is grand + and sacred in spiritual endeavour, clashing and exploding + <a class="pagenum" id="page173" title="173"> </a>again into dead-vapour balls, only to renew the same toilful + process without end—a senseless bubble-play of + Titan forces, with life, love, and aspiration brought forth + only to be extinguished. The human mind, however + ‘scientific’ its training, must often recoil from the conclusion + that this is all; and there are moments when one + passionately feels that this cannot be all. On warm June + mornings, in green country lanes, with sweet pine odours + wafted in the breeze which sighs through the branches, + and cloud-shadows flitting over far-off blue mountains, + while little birds sing their love-songs and golden-haired + children weave garlands of wild roses; or when in the solemn + twilight we listen to wondrous harmonies of Beethoven + and Chopin that stir the heart like voices from an + unseen world; at such times one feels that the profoundest + answer which science can give to our questioning is but a + superficial answer after all. At these moments, when the + world seems fullest of beauty, one feels most strongly that + it is but the harbinger of something else—that the ceaseless + play of phenomena is no mere sport of Titans, but an + orderly scene, with its reason for existing in</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>One far-off divine event</p> + <p>To which the whole creation moves.”</p> + </div> + + <p>And the following from a letter to his mother:</p> + + <p>“My chief comfort in affliction would be the recognition + that there is a Supreme Power manifested in the totality + of phenomena, the workings of which are not like the workings + of our intelligence, but far above and beyond them, + and which are obviously tending to some grand and worthy + result, even though my individual happiness gets crushed + in the process, so that the only proper mental attitude + for me, is that which says: ‘not my will but thine be + done.’”</p> + + <p>And this on Immortality (<cite>Life and Letters</cite>, II, 317):</p> + + <p>“The materialistic assumption that the life of the soul + ends with the life of the body is perhaps the most colossal + <a class="pagenum" id="page174" title="174"> </a>instance of baseless assumption that is known to + the history of philosophy. No evidence for it can be alleged + beyond the familiar fact that during the present + life we know Soul only in its association with Body, and + therefore cannot discover disembodied soul without + dying ourselves. This fact must always prevent us from + obtaining direct evidence for the belief in the soul’s survival. + But a negative presumption is not created by + the absence of proof in cases where, in the nature of things, + proof is inaccessible. With his illegitimate hypothesis + of annihilation, the materialist transgresses the bounds + of experience quite as widely as the poet who sings of + the New Jerusalem with its river of life and its streets of + gold. Scientifically speaking, there is not a particle of + evidence for either view.”</p> + + <p>On this his biographer justly comments:</p> + + <p>“This positive statement will be more seriously questioned + now than at the time when Fiske wrote. The many + able investigators engaged in probing scientifically the + mysteries of psychical phenomena, are bringing forth a + mass of evidence which goes to show the presence of a form + of existence which transcends mere physical existence.”</p> + + <p>And as showing Fiske’s attitude toward the religion + around him, his biographer says:</p> + + <p>“In Fiske’s mind Christianity was the mightiest drama + in human civilization: it was his rare gift that he could + appreciate it with the feeling of the poet as well as with + the critical judgment of the philosopher.”</p> + + <p>The passages quoted will seem almost pathetically + limited, in view of the new phenomena of mind which, + whether they be or be not found to demonstrate for our + souls a longer existence than experience has ever demonstrated + before, unquestionably already demonstrate for + them a wider scope.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">It has not been more than a couple of years since a + leading American author, whose work has often ornamented + <a class="pagenum" id="page175" title="175"> </a>the pages of the <span class="special_name">Unpopular Review</span>, said: “I + hate the very name of Evolution.” This was because + Spencer traced the law no farther than it could be expressed + in terms of Matter and Motion, and our friend + was a profound student of the Greek and Oriental imaginings + which try to transcend all that can be expressed + in those terms.</p> + + <p>And yet a few years before, the same scholar was one of + the earliest students in this country of M. Bergson—the + Bergson to whom a friend lately said: “People run + after you because you have covered the colossal forbidding + structure raised by Darwin and Spencer, with + flowers.” “No,” said Bergson, “I have shown that the + flowers necessarily grow out of it.”</p> + + <p>The paradoxical student of Bergson, who did not see + these flowers, has since grown to a better realization of + them, and of the Law of Evolution. He lately said that he + was tracing the course of thought from Plato to Christ, + and when his companion remarked: “Oh! You’re writing + on the evolution of the Christian religion,” he admitted + the soft impeachment. But what Bergson did not do for + him, has been partly done, though indirectly, as the same + thing has been done for the world more than by any other + man, by Fiske.</p> + + <p>President Butler once said that Philosophy begins where + Spencer left off. But he did not say, and could not justly + say, that it begins beyond regions whither Spencer + pointed the way. In fact he was not just in saying that + Spencer’s generalizations, in the regions to which he confined + them, were not Philosophy, or that there was any + real break between those regions and the regions beyond, + where they were carried by Fiske, or even the regions still + farther beyond where, whatever may be the outcome, + they are now being carried by students given to legitimate + Psychical Research. Spencer was too early for the + movement into the latter, and as to his relations with the + former, Fiske well says (<cite>Evolution and Religion</cite>, p. 277):</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page176" title="176"> </a>“There are some people who seem to think that it is not + enough that Mr. Spencer should have made all these + priceless contributions to human knowledge, but actually + complain of him for not giving us a complete and exhaustive + system of theology into the bargain.”</p> + + <p>Yet Spencer, though he restrained himself from transcendental + speculations regarding Evolution, was by no + means insensible to them when made by others. Some + readers not altogether unfamiliar with Emerson will be + surprised at the collection made by Fiske’s biographer, + of Emerson’s inspirations regarding Evolution, especially + as they were given on an almost negligible knowledge + of the scientific development of the law. Spencer appreciated + them so highly that among his few American + pilgrimages was one to Concord, and this despite Spencer’s + distrust of intuition, and Emerson’s faith in it.</p> + + <p>By some even modern thinkers Intuition is boldly + claimed to be an instrument of research; by others its very + existence, outside of morbid imagination, is denied, and + the only legitimate instrument of research is declared to be + observation verified by experiment that can be repeated + at will. The truth, as usual in controversy, includes both + statements, and is covered by neither. Creatures with + rudimentary eyes and ears must have “intuitions” of + colors and sounds beyond their capacity of clear apprehension; + and even our eyes, which must be rudimentary compared + with possible eyes, have in regard to even our spectrum, + intuitions, some of which have recently been made + clearer by the photograph and the X-ray. These cleared-up + intuitions are now added to positive knowledge. Intuition + is here proved an instrument of research, and it is + one in every discovery. But until verified by experiment, + it is not a <em>reliable</em> instrument of research: for what seems to + be intuition is often mistaken, and is generally so vague as + to be subject of conflicting opinions, and hence of conflicting + action. Moreover, as the subjects of intuition are + beyond our knowledge, intuitions are often held to be + <a class="pagenum" id="page177" title="177"> </a>superior to knowledge, and worthy of greater enthusiasm. + Consequently conflicting opinions regarding intuitions + have probably led to more tragedies than any other blunder. + There is no intuition more nearly universal than that + of the immortality of the soul. But even so devout a man + as Fiske pronounced it unverifiable, and it is so uncertain + that all sorts of conflicting dogmas have grown up around + it, until it has led not only to the self-immolations of India + and the human sacrifices of Mexico, but to the Arena of + Nero, the inquisition of Torquemada, the Thirty Years’ + War, and even within the memory of living men, the + agonizing rupture of many a family.</p> + + <p>Fiske did more, through deductions from the law of + Evolution, toward putting this most important of intuitions + upon the basis of established knowledge, than any + man had done before him. He did this not only in his + writings on <cite>The Idea of God</cite>, <cite>Through Nature to God</cite>, and + <cite>The Destiny of Man</cite>, but in the whole tendency of his work, + not only when expounding the Law of Evolution as Philosophy, + but in tracing it through History. In this particular + he was in advance of his great compeers in his own + department: for he did not hesitate, as Darwin, Spencer, + and Huxley did, to deal with the intuitions of his time. + Such intuitions as are true being necessarily in advance + of knowledge, there is danger of assuming to be true some + that are not. This danger kept Huxley almost entirely + away from them, and Spencer farther away than any + other great philosopher. It was this abstention, certainly + excusable and probably justifiable in one who prefers it, + that makes his philosophy hated, and prevents its being + even studied, not to say understood, by those who love + the quagmires and mirages built up by mistaken intuition.</p> + + <p>That essential instrument of research—invaluable, + despite all its dangers—Fiske estimated more broadly + and <em>justly</em> than, perhaps, any other philosopher, certainly + than his great master. This makes it singularly pathetic + <a class="pagenum" id="page178" title="178"> </a>that his premature death should have cut him off from + the investigations which have seemed to many leading + minds to point to a verification—even to have reached a + verification, of the greatest as well as the widest intuition + of the ages. If he has risen to a bird’s-eye view, or more + probably a teloptic consciousness, of what is going on here, + it must amuse and cheer him to see that the psychical researchers + are not persecuted as the evolutionists were—as + he himself was in his youth, but are at worst merely + laughed at as a set of inoffensive idiots. Balfour, Crookes, + Lodge, and Barrett are among them, and James, Hodgson, + Myers, and Sidgwick are passed from among them; and + we believe that Fiske and even Spencer, had their lot been + cast in these days, would be among the most interested + of them.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">We were on the brink of writing that probably most of + the readers of this essay will have heard some of those + unprecedented lectures and addresses on American History + delivered by Fiske during his last twenty years. But we + were startled by the realization that almost another twenty + years have elapsed since the last of those lectures was + delivered, and that a large proportion of our readers were + then too young to be interested in them. Some readers + perhaps even need to be told that Fiske was the first eminent + historian who had a clear conception of the Law of + Evolution—so far as a clear conception was then, or is + perhaps even now, possible. But his historical works containing + those lectures are so well known that it would be + as nearly superfluous as it is impracticable to descant upon + them here. Though they were published irregularly, they + make a continuous narrative from the influences leading + to the discovery of America, down to the inauguration of + Washington; and many high authorities give them the very + first rank, and declare that the author’s premature death + before bringing them down to his own time is a great loss + to the world.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page179" title="179"> </a>Some of his historical lectures were delivered to “the + very cream of London,” as Huxley said, and to the unbounded + enthusiasm of one of them, regarding whom Fiske + wrote his wife:</p> + + <p>“Spencer said after the lecture, that he was surprised at + the tremendous grasp I had on the whole field of History + and the art with which I used such a wealth of materials. + Said I had given him new ideas of Sociology, and that if + I would stick to History, I could go beyond anything ever + yet done. Said still more: I never saw Spencer warm up + so. I said I didn’t really dream when writing about American + history that there could be anything so new about it. + ‘Well,’ said Spencer, ‘it <em>is</em> new anyway: you are opening + a new world of reflections to me, and I shall come to the + rest of the lectures <em>to be taught</em>!’”</p> + + <p>The estimation of Fiske’s historical work in England is + farther shown by his having received an invitation, which + he could not accept, to deliver a long course of lectures + at Oxford; and another, which he did accept but died before + he could fulfil, to represent America by an oration + at the millenary celebration in honor of King Alfred.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">To appraise and compare the learning of great scholars + is hardly possible. Fiske was unquestionably one of the + most learned of men. In 1863 he pronounced Spencer + the most learned man living. I knew them both pretty + well, Fiske very well, and to my ignorant apprehension + he always seemed the more learned of the two. One thing + stood out in the learning of them both—so little of it + was “useless knowledge.” Many contend that no such + thing exists, their general lemma being: “You never can + tell when a bit of knowledge will come into play.” But you + attempt to tell every time you seek a truth: you estimate + its value as compared with other truths that you might + be seeking, and while you can know but a minute portion + of all that is known, you do, if you are in earnest, take + precious good care that your portion shall contain what + <a class="pagenum" id="page180" title="180"> </a>you deem to be of most worth. If you happen to have a + genius for abstract speculation, whose bearing on human + happiness may be imperceptible, you indulge your propensity, + and justify yourself by the “You never can tell.” + But after all, probably it will never be told, and the results + of your acquisitions may be as futile as those of the + man generally called the most erudite of our time, all of + whose learning did not prevent his maundering about “infallible + authority” in a human brain, speaking tolerantly + of persecution; and writing “different to.” Nor did it + enable him to produce any very great work, or give him + a range of thought materially wider than if he had lived + six centuries earlier. Fiske’s erudition not only fortified his + judgment, but was a basis for many productions of great + scope and importance.</p> + + <p>Fiske wasted very little time on learning that led nowhere. + He knew most of the famous futilities generally + called Philosophy, but he studied them as a pathologist + studies his morbid specimens—to learn and teach what + to avoid and how to cure. From his learning grew great + and true and useful thoughts, whereas from the learning + of many great scholars grow no thoughts at all.</p> + + <p>He went to the root of the matter when he said (<cite>Life + and Letters</cite>, I, p. 255): “There are so many things to be + learned, that at first sight they may seem like a confused + chaos. The different departments of knowledge may appear + so separate and conflicting, and yet so mingled and + interdependent, as to render it a matter of doubt where + the beginning should be made. But when we have come + to a true philosophy, and make <em>that</em> our stand-point, all + things become clear. We know what things to learn, and + what, in the infinite mass of things to leave unlearned—and + then the Universe becomes clear and harmonious.”</p> + + <p>Before the vastness of Fiske’s knowledge was summed + up in his biography, even those who knew him best probably + had a very inadequate idea of it. The traditional + “everything about something and something about everything” + <a class="pagenum" id="page181" title="181"> </a>is all that is conventionally expected from great + scholars, but Fiske probably came as near to knowing + everything about everything as any man ever did. He + knew more about philosophy than most good philosophers, + more about history than most good historians, more about + biology than most good biologists, more about languages + than most good philologists, more about law than most + good lawyers, and even more about music than most + good musicians. Not only had he studied more widely + than most of them, but he remembered with an ease and + accuracy seldom equalled. He said that if he ever read a + fact in connection with a date, the two were fixed together + in his memory, and it was astonishing to test him on such + points. For instance, in December, 1898, he might say, + “You remember that on February 27, 1878, you wrote + me so-and-so”; and this, with him, was a mere matter of + course.</p> + + <p>His liberality and happy ingenuity in sharing his knowledge + with his friends were delightful. In many a talk into + the small hours and even into the dawn, Fiske did most of + the talking; and yet in such a way that nobody thought + of his monopoly of it until afterwards.</p> + + <p>Among the things that his biographer left out was + that old black meerschaum pipe of the late sixties and early + seventies. It was an equilateral triangle about two and + a half inches on edge, cut from a slab of meerschaum a + little over an inch thick. It had a cherry stem about a + foot long. When Fiske got settled down, he would slowly + pull the bowl and the stem and the tobacco separately + from some of the infinite recesses of his person, and get + them together and in operation, and then heave one of his + immense sighs of contentment, and be ready for conversation. + Yet there’s a paradox in my recollections of this + pipe. I’m sure all those I have stated are correct, and yet + at that time “the recesses of his person” had hardly begun + to approximate infinity, as they afterwards did: amid + all the impressions is one that he was rather slight, but + <a class="pagenum" id="page182" title="182"> </a>that must have had something to do with the thinnish + beard of the portrait before me as I write, which it is + a pity was not put into the biography.</p> + + <p>He was the “broadest-minded” man I ever knew—most + alive to the good points of things he did not endorse. + During his whole life his attitude toward the religion + which had persecuted him, was one of reverent but discriminating + affection.</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">Yet it is hardly fair to discourage readers, as it must be + admitted Fiske’s biographer does, by leaving the implication + that this extraordinary creature was superhuman.</p> + + <p>With all his colossal powers, he was not, perhaps fortunately + for us, what is usually called a genius: his conclusions + were reasoned and consistent, and his likes and + dislikes reliable. But he had not that intuitive power + which leads a man like a bee in a quick straight line to + the essential thing, or to put vast accumulations of truth + into epigrams. He was enormously instructive and always + entertaining, but he was seldom suggestive. He dealt + in food, rather than in condiments. He had to plod to + his conclusions in his irresistible elephantine way. To get + rid of Christian dogmatism, when the first page of the + Westminster Catechism is enough for some men, he had + to read a library; and when he was twenty-two, he wrote + Spencer that he had “successively adopted and rejected + the system of almost every philosopher from Descartes to + Professor Ferrier.”</p> + + <p>He had his faults like the rest of us, but not as many + mean ones as most of us. He was hardly ever selfish or + irritable or impatient: the elephant bides his time, though + he never forgets. But Fiske was better than the elephant, + in that he never harbored revenge. His few faults were + “childlike and bland,” though, unlike those of the accepted + exemplar of those virtues, never deceitful, and to a great + extent they were forced upon him by circumstances, and of + course were “faults of his qualities”—of a mind that could + <a class="pagenum" id="page183" title="183"> </a>not hold itself down to the business of life. But take him + by and large—and he was so very large—he was not only + a very great man, but a very good man. Yet he was not, + nor was ever anybody else, such a man as biographers + necessarily depict if they write while there are still living + those whom the whole truth could hurt.</p> + + <p>But our present biographer has not even brought out, + except as they show themselves by implication, some of + Fiske’s remarkable virtues. During an acquaintance of + very exceptional intimacy, I never heard him curse any + human being or speak of one with merciless hate. Of one + who, he thought, had injured him unjustifiably and cruelly, + he generally made fun; of another, who presented fewer + temptations to burlesque, he often spoke admiringly, and + perhaps less often with a sarcasm doubly powerful because + judicial.</p> + + <p>He had absolutely no pride of intellect: partly, perhaps, + because from childhood he naturally kept himself, by his + chosen reading, in contact with the greatest intellects, + and so was never struck with the greatness of his own. We + had not been out of college long, and I had not made + much progress out of the average new A. B.’s worship of + intellect, when, as we were speaking of a common friend, I + said something to the effect that I wished he had more + brains (I now suspect that he had more than I had) when + Fiske, who had more than both of us, made a few remarks, + very kind though very instructive, on the superiority to + mere intellectual power, of goodness, sympathy, and refinement. + Once with a friend unknown to fame, who + seemed a mere pigmy beside him, he had had a long talk + with one of the world’s greatest men, and Fiske was heard + to say that he was struck throughout by the fact that his + obscure friend showed more intelligence than <em>he</em> did. The + fact probably was that his friend’s intelligence really was + quicker than the elephantine but irresistible movements + of Fiske’s great mind. But Fiske did not think of his + own power, but only of the agility of his friend. The + <a class="pagenum" id="page184" title="184"> </a>friend subsequently said that he supposed he had understood + all that was in the books of his two companions, but + he certainly did not understand all that was in their talk—the + talk in which Fiske had ascribed to himself the less intelligence. + Another illustration: many years ago, when + Taine was on the lips of all American readers, Fiske said: + “He’s a sort of big John Fiske—a diffuser of other men’s + ideas, without ever having originated an idea himself.” + Probably this was before Fiske had developed his own + idea, generally recognized as original, of the effect of long + infancy in evolving the higher qualities of a species.</p> + + <p>Yet Fiske’s distinction between finders and diffusers is + not necessarily as modest as, at first sight, it appears, and + certainly not as simple. Newton, Darwin, Spencer, and + their kind undoubtedly form a very respectable group, + but so do St. Paul and all the great apostles of all the + faiths, not to speak of the historians. And on which side + of the line, if you run it through all writers, will you put + Homer, Dante, and Shakespear?</p> + + <hr class="thoughtbreak" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">The world was never as full as it is just now of what + pleases to consider itself “advanced thinking.” Some of + it is advanced, and a little of it is thinking; but most of it, + all unknown to those who spout it, has been exploded over + and over again. As a mass, its quality is such that one + sometimes (but very rarely, it is to be feared) feels a half-humorous + self-distrust in propounding the share of it that + one believes in most. The risk has to be taken, however, + and we venture to state what seem to us some of the profoundest + and most important of our present views of the + universe and man’s relation to it, which, based very + largely on the discoveries of Darwin and Spencer, especially + of Spencer, Fiske, on the testimony of Darwin and + Spencer themselves, did more than any other man had + then done, or we think has yet done, to develop and disseminate. + To extract them from his voluminous writings + and state them in his own language, with the brevity required + <a class="pagenum" id="page185" title="185"> </a>here, would be impossible. We have already said + that he was not a maker of epigrams: the sweep of his + mind was too broad and slow. When he gave you anything, + he gave you the whole of it, because, strangely often, + he knew the whole of it, so far as anybody did; but he gave + only its essentials: he was never a bore.</p> + + <p>The Law of Evolution contains nothing counter to the + Moral Law: it only changes the old sanctions of it. In + the control of the universe, it substitutes for an anthropomorphic, + tinkering, and even “jealous” God, a Law that + varies not, and, despite terrible apparent exceptions, on + the whole makes for righteousness and for happiness. + Even now, while most of the world is steeped more than + ever before in anxiety and grief, and while scores of miles + are covered with slaughter, the vast preponderance of + the earth’s surface is covered with beauty, and the vast + majority of human beings are smiling. Moreover, the + Law of Evolution indicates that the favorable conditions + are to increase for a period longer than we can conceive, + and then gradually and painlessly disappear, to be revived + in a new evolution.</p> + + <p>The discovery of the Law of Evolution has already + done much to solve the mystery of evil. Catastrophism + is a corollary of it: if there were no imperfection there + could be no advance. Evil comes from a lack of balance + between forces. When balance is disturbed—by anything + from indigestion in a protozoon up to a storm on + the ocean where he lives, there is a catastrophe. Evil is + not a positive thing, but merely lack of the good, or lack + of proportion in the good—inadequacy or excess, the + excess being when a force or a passion good in itself exceeds + the forces that usually keep it within bounds—when one + force of those that hold the earth’s crust in equilibrium + becomes excessive, and there is earthquake; when love + of country seeks to expand it, at the expense of other + countries, and there is war; when the appetite that + creates and conserves property exceeds the respect for + <a class="pagenum" id="page186" title="186"> </a>the rights of others, and there is theft or robbery or + even murder; when the passion that perpetuates the + race grows to excess, and its rightful result in the family + is prevented or destroyed, often with attendant deceit, + violence, murder.</p> + + <p>When Rochefoucauld said: “Our virtues are most frequently + but vices disguised,” he said an impossible thing, + and spoke, as most proverb makers do, from mere habit + of paradox and love of it. He would have told a fundamental + truth, however, if he had said: Our vices are most frequently + but virtues disguised—by inflation.</p> + + <p>But deeper in the individual soul than any of these + problems, is one that Evolution has as yet directly done + little to clarify. In substituting for Providence, a wisdom + that (so far as our poor wits can state the conditions) provided + for the exigencies beforehand by Law, instead of constantly + handling them as they arise, Evolution raises the + question: How far down into the details of our lives does + the law go? Of all questions bearing upon our lives, there + is but one deeper and more anxious: Does the law work + out for good as far as it goes? Perhaps the answer can be + settled only by experience, and judgment depends largely + on temperament. And yet experience has provided all + thinking peoples with expressions that assert a favorable + solution. Job was not the first to say: “Though He slay + me, yet will I trust in Him.” All literatures abound in + such expressions, as Pope’s</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>All chance, direction, which thou canst not see;</p> + <p>All discord, harmony not understood;</p> + <p>All partial evil, universal good:</p> + <p>And, spite of pride, in erring reason’s spite,</p> + <p>One truth is clear, Whatever is, is right.</p> + </div> + + <p class="continued_paragraph">(Never deny that it’s as near right as it <em>can</em> be.) And + there are many such expressions as Tennyson’s</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>Oh yet we trust that somehow good</p> + <p>Will be the final goal of ill,</p> + </div> + + <p class="continued_paragraph"><a class="pagenum" id="page187" title="187"> </a>or as Paul’s</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>Whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth,</p> + </div> + + <p class="continued_paragraph">or Shakespear’s</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>There is some soul of goodness in things evil,</p> + </div> + + <p class="continued_paragraph">or Thomson’s</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>From seeming evil still educing good,</p> + </div> + + <p class="continued_paragraph">or Emerson’s</p> + + <div class="poem"> + <p>Every evil [has] its good.</p> + </div> + + <p>If the intuitions of these men in advance of the race + are not foolishness, this matter must be regulated by some + great principle—perhaps some corollary of “the law of + compensation,” that has been so generally guessed at—notably + by Emerson, and which seems closely akin to the + Law of Equilibration, whose demonstration by Spencer + has no small claim to be considered the highest reach of + the human mind.</p> + + <p>Few men have given, or even recognized, an answer + from their own experience. Few men, even, live long + enough for experience to give very full indication. Whatever + may be the egotism of obtruding here personal + experience on a point so intimate, I follow what in + this connection seems almost a duty, in stating the conviction + of a very long life which has known its share of + shadow, that in the average man under average circumstances + the Divine Law does go down farther into the details + of our lives than we can realize, and there work out + good from apparent evil. Yet though the question as we + stated it above, in terms of Law instead of Providence, + is not entirely new to thinkers, before the latter part + of the last century it had been as vague as had been the + conceptions of Evolution. It seems but yesterday, and it + is with a start that one realizes that this epoch is already + superseded by one where the range of mind must be + mapped out anew, and where reaches of it that Fiske pronounced + <a class="pagenum" id="page188" title="188"> </a>impossible are declared by no mean observers + to have actually been accomplished.</p> + + <p>It is, however, questionable how far the testimony of + poets and imaginative thinkers is the result of optimistic + generalization, and how far the result of strict experience. + As sober a man as Socrates said that his attendant monitor + always kept him right. Had he had the modern conception + of the universal beneficent Law, and the very modern + conception of impressions, <em>under Law</em>, from discarnate + intelligences, perhaps he would have regarded that attendant + of his as a manifestation from the source of all + Law—of that Law whose penetration into the minutiæ + of our lives we are now considering.</p> + + <p>Now if you are in the habit of testing questions by the + law of Evolution, ask yourself (if you have not already + done so and obtained a satisfactory answer), at what point + in your processes and the processes of your environment, + the operation of Law, and the resulting evolution, stops. + Don’t bother with the paradox of Free Will and Determinism, + or any other paradox that proves a question to be + beyond the range of our faculties, but accept the fact + which you cannot escape, that your life is the result of the + interaction of two processes of Law that manifestly tend + on the whole to happiness, and perhaps you will find it as + hard <em>not</em> to believe that the beneficent Law goes down to + the minutest details of your life, as it is <em>to</em> believe a conception + so novel and so tremendous.</p> + + <p>It may not be unthinkable under average circumstances, + but when the world is cursed as never before with carnage + and outrage, in relation to the millions suffering one hesitates + even to suggest such an idea. But this is hardly the + time to pass upon it. And yet many sane people do pass + upon it, and believe that out of all this agony more good + than evil is to come, and to come to each person concerned. + Such a belief, however, is generally based on faith in the + immortality of the soul. Here comes in the pragmatic + argument, never so strong as now. If these millions + <a class="pagenum" id="page189" title="189"> </a>of bright young lives have been developed merely to be + prematurely snuffed out at the behest of a barbarian mad + with the lust of conquest, the universe is <em lang="la" xml:lang="la">pro tanto</em> a farce. + But if, in the glory of heroism and self-sacrifice, they are + advanced to a higher stage of being, the sanity and beneficence + of the universe are vindicated. True, the pragmatic + argument is a dangerous thing, but in this most + important particular, it never had so much support from + positive evidence as now. It looks as if humanity were + at last evolved to the point where the intuitions of the + gifted of the ages, from Socrates to Swedenborg, may soon + be supported by experience open to the observation of all.</p> + + <p>In his day, Fiske did probably more than any other man + to rationalize these leading ideas that are still little more + than faiths, and to keep men’s minds open to the best + within our knowledge, and the influences that must exist + beyond it.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="article_15"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page190" title="190"> </a>PLEASE EXPLAIN THESE DREAMS</h2> + + <p class="first_paragraph"><span class="first_word">Your</span> travels, your babies, and your dreams,—these, + it is said, you may talk of only at your + peril. And yet I am emboldened in this instance to defy + the adage, though in general I believe it to be nearly + incontestable, because I think I may excite a certain + curiosity by recounting a kind of dream that comes to me + occasionally, a dream not wonderful in substance but + one that raises a question in psychology, or in common + sense, to which I know no answer. I may say at once + that there is nothing preternatural about the dream, + nor anything, I think, that Freudian analysts will revel + in. But there is none the less a puzzle which for me and + for the persons whom I have consulted has remained + completely baffling. What the puzzle is had best be + stated at the outset.</p> + + <p>Everybody is familiar with the kind of story that depends + for its effect upon a surprising “point” that comes + at the end, unanticipated by the hearer and amusing to + him largely in proportion as it is unexpected. Stories of + this kind are frequently elaborate; a great deal of detail + is introduced, as artfully as possible, every bit of which + must tantalizingly lead towards the point that is coming, + but no word of which must really divulge that point until + the moment when the <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">raconteur</em> is ready to “spring” it, + as we say, with a sudden burst. Obviously the listener + must not guess the point before that moment, or the + story will fall flat, and just as obviously the narrator must + have it in mind continually, or he could not tell the story. + He could hardly recount a tale of this variety unless he + knew how it was “coming out.” Especially if it were + considerably involved, he could scarcely pick his way + through it step by step towards an end that he did not + <a class="pagenum" id="page191" title="191"> </a>himself foresee, arranging in their places dozens of details + leading he knew not where, and then come nicely to a + climax that he himself did not anticipate—a climax + which, in this hardly conceivable case, would obviously + surprise him as much as it could his listener. The waking + mind, unless by the rarest of accidents, cannot work in + such a fashion. And my puzzle is, how can the dreaming + mind do so? For I, at least, do dream occasionally in + just this manner. I make up a story of this species in + my dream, and usually a complicated story. In it I + proceed from point to point without having any notion + of my destination; I string together a small host of details, + though I remain ignorant of their meaning and + unsuspicious of any climax that is coming later to explain + them; and when finally I reach that climax, and see the + joke that I have plotted so unwittingly, I am myself + ingenuously amused by it. And how I manage to do this + is my enigma. For obviously I either do foresee the + point of the story or I do not. If I do, how can I be surprised + when it arrives? If I do not, how can I prepare + for it so carefully? Either case supposes a manner of + mentation hardly comprehensible.</p> + + <p>Two dreams of this species I should like to offer for + consideration. I have had not less than twenty others, + widely different in substance though all alike in principle; + but the memory of most of them is vague if not + entirely obliterated. Of the first dream here related I + may say that I am repeating it from a fresh memory + and am following the notes I made of it in full immediately + upon awakening from it. The account here given is + therefore as accurate as I can make it. I may further + explain that the setting of the dream is a very natural + one for me. I happen to be a college professor, and lecturing + to classes is my daily round. Also I have lived in + France, and have studied and written about the educational + system of that country; and I number among my + friends a distinguished French professor now visiting + <a class="pagenum" id="page192" title="192"> </a>America. The bearing of these facts upon the dream + will be clear in a moment.</p> + + <p>I dreamt that I was lecturing to one of my regular + classes in college. In the class, upon my entrance, I was + surprised to find my friend the French professor, of + whom I spoke a moment ago. With him there was an + impressive individual whom I somehow recognized as a + French inspector of schools—one of those officials whose + visits to provincial schools and whose consequent reports + to the minister at Paris are the chief hope and dread of + the French pedagogue. How these gentlemen should + have come to be visiting my class, I could not imagine, + but I do not think I was much worried in the dream over + that question. I do remember telling myself that as a + mere American professor I had nothing to fear from the + inspector’s formidable authority, though perhaps with + this reflection there went also a resolution to put my best + foot forward in such distinguished company. But I had + not much time to ponder these matters before proceeding + upon my lecture.</p> + + <p>It was then that a real surprise began. So far as I + could tell, my opening sentences were sufficiently conventional, + but the way the class was affected by them + was singular to a degree. Hardly had I reached the + middle of the first one before all the students had their + eyes fixed on me in a way that might possibly have been + complimentary had not their expressions been so various + and so peculiar. A few students wore a look of great + relief—for all the world as if they had expected to find + me dumb on that day, and were agreeably surprised to + be disillusioned. A considerably larger number frowned + displeasure, just as if I had disturbed them in the pursuit + of something that was no affair of mine. But the large + majority showed mere astonishment, and of that emotion, + indeed, a good measure was written on the faces of + all. I had no notion what to make of these unusual appearances. + Inevitably my first thought was to glance + <a class="pagenum" id="page193" title="193"> </a>furtively down at my clothes and shoes to see if everything + was well in those departments. Also I raised my + hand as unobtrusively as possible to discover whether + perchance I had left my hair uncombed. In the absence + of the mirror’s final test I had to conclude that all was + about as it should be.</p> + + <p>Naturally my next sentences hardly came trippingly + from the tongue, nor did any alteration occur in my listeners + to facilitate my labors. On the contrary, what had + at first been mainly mere surprise upon their faces was + growing rapidly to obvious merriment with about half + of the class, and to evident disapprobation with the + others. “The explanation of what we call the Enlightenment + of the eighteenth century,” I remember hurling + at them with a fine generality of dream-eloquence, “is + to be sought not so much in the influence of the doctrines + of Descartes proper, or of those who could call themselves + consistent Cartesians, as in the general dependence + upon the guidance of human ratiocination, of which + dependence he was only an illustrious example.” This + remarkable statement did not seem to offend any of my + hearers, but neither did it mollify them. By a considerable + effort, however, I was regaining a measure of composure, + as I proceeded into my subject, in spite of all + the frowners and all the titterers in the class. There + was nothing to do, I felt, but to brave both parties, and + in some degree, as the minutes dragged on, I seemed to + be succeeding in the effort. At least there was less staring + at me, and one after another the faces of my students + were turned down to the desks, and pens began to course + across pages in what appeared to me to be good note-taking + fashion.</p> + + <p>But I was soon to find that my troubles had only begun. + The class had indeed ceased to perform like one man in + astonishment, but various individuals now began to act + in fashions unaccountably extraordinary. Not only did + resentment at my lecture keep lingering, and growing, on + <a class="pagenum" id="page194" title="194"> </a>many countenances, and not only did laughter keep bubbling + up in others, but now certain more specific eccentricities + began exhibiting themselves. A mild instance + was the action of one of my most devoted note-takers, + a woman who sat on the front row. She had always + taken too many notes, as I had observed; she never + missed anything important, and she frequently copied + down much that was far from important. And now I + noticed that in the middle of certain cardinal statements + I was making, and even making slowly in order that + every one who wanted them in a note-book might have + time to get them fully, she took her pen from the paper, + and meditatively putting the end of it in her mouth, + proceeded to gaze out of the window into vacancy as if + trying to think what on earth to write next.</p> + + <p>But this, as I say, was mild. That particular student + was too well-bred to be ruder. So was another girl on + the front row who, a little later, laid aside her pen and + paper and sank her head for several minutes into her + hands in such a way as to make me wonder whether she + was suffering from headache or whether she was politely + veiling an outbreak of laughter such as certain other + members of the class were at no such pains to conceal. + Certainly when her face emerged it was clear that she + had not even been smiling. She looked at me fixedly for + a minute, with such an inquiring though guarded glance + as one might give a stranger whom one half suspected + of mild lunacy, and then resumed work with her pen. + There were numerous examples of similarly harmless but + abnormal conduct, and I had no choice but to endure + them in wondering patience. But when one sedate and + trusted student, also a woman, who sat in the rear of the + class, deliberately caught my eye and then impressively + laid her finger tightly over her closed lips, thus giving + me the unmistakable signal for silence, my astonishment + and bewilderment grew amain. What on earth could be + wrong with me, I asked myself, that I should be bedevilling + <a class="pagenum" id="page195" title="195"> </a>my students in this fashion? What absurdity was at the + bottom of all this? Had everybody in my class gone + crazy? Or had I?</p> + + <p>Somehow I went on lecturing. As I remember it now, + the lecture seemed orthodox enough, in spite of the + strange events that it inspired. I felt that I was acquitting + myself moderately well, though I remember that + I mopped my brow repeatedly, and longed for the end + of the period as I had never longed for time to pass before. + What would my visitors think of me, or of this precious + class of mine? I alone had seen that mute sign for silence, + to be sure, but no one could fail to notice the other preposterous + things that were coming to pass. For now three + men toward the rear of the class began, seemingly by + agreement between them, to shake their heads at me in + a solemn and unequivocal signal that I would do better + to leave off my lecture. This, I thought, would be the + worst; but no, in a moment one man actually stepped up + to my desk, and when I paused, whispered a very apologetic + request that I would not trouble the class further + by lecturing on this particular day. He had listened with + great interest to my former lectures, he was pleased to + say, but he felt that he was speaking for the whole class + in intimating that to-day I could not but disturb them, + and in fact endanger them, if I continued. I told him + that he could save himself from further danger by quitting + the room; and this he did forthwith, his reluctance exceeded + only by his apparent amazement.</p> + + <p>The others seemed to understand what had passed between + us, though I was sure that they could not have + overheard a word we said. Four or five of them, indeed, + rose and followed their departing brother from their room, + with faces as full of bewilderment as his. But I was past + wondering at anything by this time. Endeavoring to + seem indifferent to their departure, I ploughed on, with a + pertinacity far beyond anything I possess in a waking + state, through the middle of my lecture. I had come to + <a class="pagenum" id="page196" title="196"> </a>Rousseau and his battle with the apostles of the Enlightenment. + And about this point the craziest of all + the occurrences of this remarkable hour began. A man + on the front row picked up a card-board box from the + floor near his feet. Opening it, he produced a roll of absorbent + cotton. With bits of this he deliberately set + about stopping up his ears as tightly as he could. When + he had stuffed them full he resumed work with his pen, + but passed the cotton, with a wink, on to his neighbor, + who repeated the performance. A third student filled + his organs of audition and handed the box on to a fourth. + I watched that blessed roll of cotton make its round of + the students. One and all of them, men and women, + stuffed their ears with it!</p> + + <p>How I managed to keep on talking is rather more than + I can tell. I can only say that I continued automatically, + and paid the slightest possible attention to the antics + with which my auditors were pleased to amuse themselves. + I was but little surprised when, after a while, + they began to leave. Not concertedly, but one by one, + they rose and passed out, still lowering, giggling, trembling, + looking askance at me, or exhibiting some other + inexplicable emotion as they departed. Each one, with + whatever mien, took pains to leave a record in the form + of a few sheets of paper deposited on my desk as he passed + out, but I was too callous or too distraught by this time + to do more than barely notice the circumstance. As for + my visitors from France, they had long since disappeared—not + by walking out, like the students, but + simply by vanishing, as people in a dream occasionally + do. I kept lecturing, doggedly, until I had only three + students left. But when two of these arose together and + took their departure, I knew nothing to do but cease. + The one auditor remaining, for that matter, was even + now about to rise from his seat. I paused. I waited as + he came slowly forward, with wonder and distress written + on his features—he was easily the best scholar in the + <a class="pagenum" id="page197" title="197"> </a>class. As I eyed him I could see that he, like so many of + the rest, seemed to be half afraid that I had lost my + mind. We shall see about that, I thought, as I addressed + him.</p> + + <p>“Will you kindly tell me, sir,” I asked him, with some + warmth, “Will you kindly tell me what I have done to + deserve such conduct as I have seen this last hour? Have + all my students gone mad, or have I?”</p> + + <p>Evidently I had, he thought, as was obvious in his + face. But he was too cautious to say so. Instead, he + manifestly did his best to placate what to him was arrant + lunacy.</p> + + <p>“Well, professor,” he faltered, “I’ve no doubt we’ve + been behaving rather badly. But, you see, we—well, + we simply couldn’t make out why you should want to + lecture all through the examination hour!”</p> + + <p>So that, of all things, was the explanation! I had simply + lectured straight through their examination, and small + wonder they took it strangely. How I had managed to + make such a fool of myself, I did not know; but at once + all their queer actions of the last hour were explained to + me. And what a joke on me! How like the absent-minded, + umbrella-carrying professor of the caricaturists—I + protest I am not that kind—to have forgotten that I + had set the examination for that day, had even sent a + secretary into the class five minutes ahead of me to distribute + the question-papers, and to have gone in then and + insisted on haranguing the class, in spite of all protest, + through the whole session!</p> + + <p>And thus laughing at my exploit, I awoke. Needless + to say, my amusement continued into the waking state, + though it was somewhat less whole-hearted. But it was + soon cut short by my jumping out of bed to put down the + notes of the dream that I have here expanded.</p> + + <p>I fear it is not a very interesting dream in itself, but + that I did not promise. Surely it is one that answers + the description given at the outset, and illustrates the + <a class="pagenum" id="page198" title="198"> </a>species somewhat elaborately. Can any one imagine a + person when awake making up such a story, planning so + many details of it so carefully, without an inkling in his + mind of the explanation that was to come to clear up all + the mystery in the end? I do not believe so. But if not, + how can one do in a dream a thing so impossible in a + wakeful state? I, the dreamer, involve myself in a story + in which I fabricate a series of occurrences incomprehensible + to me unless I have the key that explains them, + a series that nobody could well string together unless he + had that key. One would say that I must have had the + key in my possession as I pieced together the occurrences. + Well, then, how could I be totally perplexed at those occurrences + as they were happening, and how could I be + astounded and provoked to laughter when I produced + my own explanation of them? This is surely too much + like believing that a magician will be amazed at his own + trick.</p> + + <p>Let me recount one other dream of this variety, a + shorter one but possibly even more pointed. As it occurred + to me some months ago, and as it comprises only + an after-dinner speech, I cannot now pretend to report + the words of it with literal accuracy. But that is not + necessary if the reader will take my assurance that though + I do not give the precise words of the speech as I heard + it in the dream, I offer a version similar enough to be + quite as satisfactory for the present purpose, and differing + in no point of principle from the original. The very + vacuity of the present version will be sufficient evidence, + I hope, of my endeavor to be as faithful as possible to + the original. I even feel that I must request the reader + not to be disdainful of the puns that embellish the oration, + since it is something other than the art of rhetoric that + is here in question.</p> + + <p>“Ladies and gentlemen,” said the speaker, a man who + by the way is celebrated as a post-prandial artist, but + who need not be blamed in person for this coruscation, + <a class="pagenum" id="page199" title="199"> </a>“we have with us this evening a man who bears an honorable + and formidable name, a name which, in at least one + person who possessed it, is enrolled on the tablets of immortality. + It is a bellicose name, and therefore timely + enough. But it need make no one tremble, since its most + illustrious possessor loved to make the world shake with + laughter as well as wince before the levelled spear of his + sarcasm. I will not say that our guest of the evening has + all the talents of what a tipsy man might call his great + ‘name-shake;’ but I will answer for it that he can himself + give a good imitation of what our school-boys sometimes + call the ‘music of the spears.’ However, I will ‘no be + speiring,’ as the Scotch say, into their further similarities; + I prefer simply to present to you, ladies and gentlemen, + Mr. Shakespeare.”</p> + + <p>And then all the audience laughed, and I laughed with + them. I laughed because I was taken by surprise when + the name came and explained all the puns that had preceded + it. Not by the slightest suspicion had I anticipated + the name; on the contrary, I had been genuinely puzzled + by the queer locutions introductory to it, for I did not + even realize that they were puns upon a name that was + to be pronounced later. No doubt the puns are vapid + enough (though vastly amusing in a dream) but they are + also fairly elaborate, and in the dream I think they were + considerably more so than in the transcript here set down + from memory. The question is, how can one dream a + thing of this kind? For I, the dreamer, made up all + those puns, since I, of course, concocted the speech I + dreamed. And either I knew the name that I was punning + on, or else I did not know it. If I knew it, how could + I be astonished into laughter when it came to light in the + dream? And if I did not know it, how could I invent a + lot of puns on it? What process of cerebration was I + guilty of?</p> + + <p>I know no answer to this question, and therefore I submit + it to the public. In the literature of dreams that I + <a class="pagenum" id="page200" title="200"> </a>have perused I have found neither a solution of the present + problem nor any instance of the kind of dream here mentioned. + Informally I have consulted two or three psychologists + of my acquaintance, but though they have + been interested in the question, they have been unable to + suggest an explanation. Only one other person that I + know experiences such dreams as these, and he is as much + interested in them as I am; but although he is himself a + bit of a psychologist, he has no answer to the question + here propounded. Can any one do better?</p> + + <hr class="short" /> + + <p class="post_thoughtbreak">As has been said before in these pages, considerable + attention to the topics covered by “Psychical Research” + has given us a very strong suspicion that the autonomy + of each mind is telepathically shared by other minds, + and farther that this is due to a degree of identity of all + mind somewhat similar to the identity of all force and + all matter—this identity of force and matter being + now well recognized, despite the individual manifestations + of all three in our personalities.</p> + + <p>Between minds a degree of identity—or at least of + telepathic connection or intermingling, is abundantly + manifested by the appearance of several personalities, + or seeming personalities, through the sensitive persons + generally called mediums, and this whether the personalities + additional to the medium’s ordinary one are incarnate + or apparently postcarnate.</p> + + <p>From these indications follows very directly the guess + that such dreams as our contributor recounts are not + really of his construction, but are constructed outside of + him, and not necessarily by excarnate agencies, or even + by deliberate agencies. How or where or by whom must + be left for future knowledge to indicate.</p> + + <p>We have had dreams of the nature of those described + by our contributor, and have correlated them with + others entirely beyond construction by our own capacities.—<span class="special_name">Editor.</span></p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="correspondence"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page201" title="201"> </a>CORRESPONDENCE</h2> + + <h3 id="correspondence_1">More Freedom from Hereditary Bias</h3> + + <blockquote> + <p class="address_line">8 State Circle, Annapolis, Md.,<br /> + <span class="dateline">9 February, 1918.</span></p> + + <p class="salutation"><span class="special_name">Gentlemen</span>:</p> + + <p>I have your printed circular of 25 January, with an enclosed + bill for a subscription to the <span class="special_name">Unpopular Review</span> through 1918. + I have, perhaps unfortunately, not received the January issue + of the review, which you say you sent me. This is no doubt + due to my removal from Princeton, New Jersey, and to the + lethargic Princeton post-office.</p> + + <p>I had several reasons for not renewing my subscription. One + was a need for economy, and the feeling that I could better + do without the <span class="special_name">Unpopular</span> than without such a periodical as + the <cite>New Republic</cite>. Of the two, the <span class="special_name">Unpopular</span> mirrors much + the more closely some of my own convictions and principles; + but I find the <cite>New Republic</cite> indispensable if I am to keep in + touch with the aims and purposes of present-day American + Liberalism.</p> + + <p>Another reason I had for not renewing was that the <span class="special_name">Unpopular</span>, + starting its career with the very greatest promise, + had, to my humble mind, managed very quickly to run up + various side-tracks and blind alleys of opinion, and has since—amiably + but with complacency—stuck there. And there I + am content to leave it, for in losing reality it has lost life.</p> + + <p>The lightness of touch which its editor has creditably sought + to impart to its contents will not do as a substitute for life. + And even that attempt has failed; it has resulted too often in + mere pertness or a lumbering buffoonery never agreeable to + contemplate, and least of all when invoked in aid of a cause + that demands above all earnest conviction and anything but a + stupid complacency from its adherents.</p> + + <p class="closing">Yours faithfully,<br /> + <span class="signature">(signed) <span class="special_name">Robert Shafer</span>.</span></p> + </blockquote> + + <p>It may be interesting to compare with this a letter from + another correspondent with a German name, printed in + Number 17.</p> + </div> + <div class="article" id="casserole"> + + <h2><a class="pagenum" id="page202" title="202"> </a>EN CASSEROLE</h2> + + <h3 id="casserole_1">If We Are Late</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">There</span> is every prospect that this number will be out + unusually late, on account of the choke-up in transportation. + At this writing the printer ought to be at + work on the paper, which has already been on the way to + him—from Philadelphia to Massachusetts—twenty-six + days.</p> + + <p>We hope our readers will not blame the delay to us, + and that their patriotism will cheerfully endure it.</p> + + <h3 id="casserole_2">The Kindly and Modest German</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">Here</span> are some commonplaces that should be iterated + in some shape every time an American organ of opinion + goes to press.</p> + + <p>There once was such a man as the kindly and modest + German, and through his virtues he had nearly obtained + the industrial and commercial leadership of the world, + when sudden wealth and power aroused in him the brute + instincts that are latent in the best of us, and started him + after more than can be had from industry, and can be had + only by force. The brute instincts were nearer the surface + in him than in those who have a recorded civilization of + some seven or eight thousand years: for the poor Germans, + at least the ruling branch of them, have barely as many + hundred. Even Russia was Christianized four centuries + before Prussia.</p> + + <p>Now it is a rare parvenu who is not conceited. Germany + has camouflaged the old idea of conquest by that of + spreading her Kultur to the inferior portion of mankind—to + the peoples that produced Homer, Dante, Shakespear, + Newton, Darwin and Spencer—as if those peoples + were savages whose territory could be brought under civilization + <a class="pagenum" id="page203" title="203"> </a>only by conquest, and as if Germany alone had + civilization. And this absurd idea she backs up by a crude + conception of the Law of Evolution—a conception that + stops with the competition of brute forces. Coöperation, + mutual help, emulation in well doing do not enter into her + idea of evolution. She has thrown away her splendid success + in the higher competition, and reverted to the competition + of brute force,—camouflaged again by science + and cunning.</p> + + <p>When a conceited parvenu goes mad, his conceit is as + mad as the rest of him. When he is at the same time bellicose + and bloodthirsty, he will not stop fighting as long + as the conceit is in his system, and the only way to get it + out is to whip it out.</p> + + <p>It looks as if in Germany’s case we had seriously underestimated + one important feature of that job. For a long + time we thought that we had got to beat only the military + class—that they had merely fooled the kindly and + modest Germans we used to know. As lately as this + Spring, a British general told the present writer that his + people did not expect the war to be ended by a military + victory—that without an overwhelming superiority on + either side, modern warfare has at last reached the degree + of perfection long ago attained by the Kilkenny cats + (only the general did not put it in that way), and that before, + so to speak, the tails get through fighting, the kindly + and modest German people would take matters into their + own hands and stop the war, give up the plunder they + have got from their weaker neighbors (for after all, barring + their sudden occupation of a little of France, they have + with all their boasting whipped only little or undeveloped + peoples), and pay damages—as far as they can be paid. + But it has come to look mightily as if the general and his + people were mistaken—as if the kindly and modest + German no longer exists, as if the madness has seized the + whole nation, and as if there will be no way out before + we give one side the overwhelming superiority which was + <a class="pagenum" id="page204" title="204"> </a>the general’s alternative. Plainly we can’t be too quick + about it.</p> + + <p>Before the conceit is whipped out of the Germans, + they are not going to submit to any peace short of holding + on to their plunder, and as long as they have enough of + that to be visible, they are victors, and with all their conceit + in them. It would drive them into another war as + soon as they could get ready, and even meanwhile the + conditions would be intolerable—intolerable not only + for the small peoples they have conquered, but for the + rest of us.</p> + + <p>But things are very respectably intolerable as they are. + We have barely entered the war, and yet you are exceptionally + fortunate if your income has not been pinched, + your affairs generally disturbed, heavy anxieties thrown + upon you, and perhaps, even thus early, mourning. Possibly + you have found a grim consolation in realizing that + most of the time since the beginning of human records, + our present lot has been the lot of the greater portion + of mankind. Perhaps you have found a consolation less + grim in realizing that this state of affairs has been diminishing—very + notably diminishing during the century + preceding this war; and it is to be hoped that you have + found a consolation almost triumphant in the realization + that a large portion of the world at last realizes that + such conditions can be put an end to, and are grimly determined + to do it. But unless it is done thoroughly, unless + the Kaiser and his gang are as safely disposed of as Napoleon + and his gang were after Waterloo, these conditions + are going to recur indefinitely.</p> + + <p>Waterloo put an end to <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gloire</em>, but it did not quite + end the idea of the legitimacy of conquering civilized + people and good neighbors—it did not make impossible + the attitude of the German statesman who, when asked + by our ambassador Hill why Germany did not conciliate + Alsace-Lorraine, answered without the slightest suspicion + that he was showing himself a barbarian: “But we have + <a class="pagenum" id="page205" title="205"> </a>conquered them.” It was this attitude which gradually + changed Germany’s preparations against France’s possible + <em lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">revanche</em> after 1870, into a scheme to conquer the + world. This antiquated idea of right by conquest, and + this barbarous passion for it, have done more than anything + else, except perhaps dogmatic religions, for the + misery of mankind. This attitude survives, among lettered + nations, only in Germany and her allies. We have + got to fight until we kill it, no matter how many treaties + of peace intervene: and it will not be killed as long as + Germany is left in possession of a foot of the territory + she has seized during the present war.</p> + + <p>All these considerations render the idea of a “Peace + without victory” worse than a mere disgusting piece of + sentimentalism. They render it a danger, and one that + unless obliterated, sooner or later must explode.</p> + + <p>But behind all that, it is absurd in its very conception. + What could be more ridiculous than a treaty with Germany? + It would of course be ridiculous on the part of a + nation that did not intend to keep it, but on the part of + a nation that did intend to keep it, it would be doubly ridiculous. + Nothing can be plainer than that real peace cannot + be reached, no matter what treaties and intervals of + nominal peaces intervene, before Germany has her conceit + whipped out of her, and whipped out so thoroughly + that, as in Napoleon’s case, there will be no need for discussion + or pretended agreements, but that she will simply + be told what she must do, and made to do it.</p> + + <p>At one time there was hope that the kindly and modest + German the elders among us knew, would take hold and + attend to the matter himself. But he is not here to do + it: we have got to do it ourselves, and we cannot afford + to flinch, or dally, or stop half way.</p> + + <h3 id="casserole_3">What the Cat Thinks of the Dog</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">I am</span> not altogether sure whether I like the Dog or + merely tolerate him. It puzzles me to say just what I + <a class="pagenum" id="page206" title="206"> </a>do, in a manner, like about my house-companion. For a + certainty, his manners are very distressing, and they evoke + my most hearty disapproval. I cannot abide those rude + volcanic barking fits of his. Often, when lying snugly + tail-enfolded by the gently warming kitchen stove, lost + in a comfortable dreamless doze—how delicious this + semi-Nirvana of the senses!—I would suddenly be + startled into undesired wakefulness by my friend’s frenzied + howls. You’d think he had wanted to call my attention + to a mouse recently entrapped or, at least, to the + arrival of the butcher with a fat quarter of lamb wherefrom + one might expect the carving of good cheer for him + and me. But no! nine times out of ten it would but be + some uninteresting urchin whom he had caught sight of + through the window, and who was sauntering a block + away with an insolent swagger that could not but arouse + my profound contempt. I sometimes find it far from + easy to keep my temper in such circumstances and to + refrain from wishing him and his urchin a watery grave + the next time they betake themselves to the river for + swimming and diving sports. Yet I must not judge him + harshly. An unkind nature has granted him a most + unmusical, a most nerve-shattering voice, incapable of + the least culture.</p> + + <p>I take much exception also to the ungentle and ungraceful + manner in which he swings his tail, or rather + flips it back and forth and jerks it up and down, for one + can hardly talk of swinging where no smooth delicately + rounded curves are perceptible. How inferior, both by + heredity and by training, is the Dog’s handling of his tail + to that of the Cat! How little he understands the art of + curving and waving and uncurving the tail in the nicely + nuanced rhythms and exquisitely designed patterns that + are so familiar to ourselves! If the aerial artistry of the + Cat’s tail may be fitly compared to the beautifully rounded + brushwork of our Chinese laundrymen when, as I have + incidentally observed him more than once, he prepares + <a class="pagenum" id="page207" title="207"> </a>his stock of wash tickets, the tail movements of the Dog + remind me of nothing so much as the ugly zigzagging and + unsymmetrical lines that my master’s little boy produces, + squeakingly, on his slate in his vain attempts to draw a + locomotive (at least I gather, from various remarks that + I have overheard, that this is what he has in mind). No, + there is not the slightest reason to allow for an æsthetic + strain in my friend’s psychology. Frankly, I do not + believe he knows the difference between an Impressionist + masterpiece and a bill-board daub. Nothing, further, + can be more absurd than the frequency with which the + Dog’s rapid and angular tail movements are executed. + No sooner does the master, or his little boy, or the mistress, + or even the garbage man appear, than this tail + that I speak of is set furiously wagging and swishing, + often at the cost of a cup or plate which may happen to + be within reach of its tufted point. I wonder that they + tolerate him in the kitchen at all. I shall never forget + the time that, excited beyond control at the unexpected + return of the master from a fishing excursion, he scampered + about madly and lashed his tail from side to side + with the utmost fury. Well accustomed by this time to + his vulgar ways, I paid little attention to the hubbub + but continued quietly lapping up my saucer of milk, + when I was suddenly stunned by a powerful swish of the + Dog’s milk-spattered tail against my face. Angered + beyond expression, both by the Dog’s extreme rudeness + and by the almost total loss of a savory meal, I was about + to scratch out his eyes, but the evident unwillingness + of the maid to suffer retaliatory measures, and the reflection + on my part that the Dog’s conduct, reprehensible + as it was, had not been dictated by any unfriendly feeling + for myself, prevented a scrimmage. It was as well, for + nothing pains me more than to part company with my + dignity, even if only for a moment.</p> + + <p>In view of so many just grounds for complaint,—and + there are many that I might add,—it puzzles me, I + <a class="pagenum" id="page208" title="208"> </a>repeat, to say just what I like about the Dog. Can it be + that, living, as we do, under the same roof, and thus forced + by circumstance to put up with each other for better or + for worse, we have become habituated to a common lot, + and learned to ignore the numerous divergencies of taste + and philosophy? From a strictly scientific standpoint, + this is an excellent explanation of our mutual forbearance, + but I am afraid that sincerity prevents me from + accepting it as a completely satisfying solution of the + problem. How comes it that, when the Dog, in company + with his master, has absented himself from the house for a + period of more than usual length, as once for a week’s + hunting jaunt, I find myself getting fidgety and morose, + as though there were something missing to complete my + usual feeling of contentment? And how comes it that + last year, when the Dog’s right forefoot was caught in + the door, and he set up a caterwauling (excuse the Hibernicism) + that made him a frightful nuisance for the rest of + the day, I, who would ordinarily have been the first to + resent such a noise, as evidencing a deplorable lack of + vocal self-control and taste, did on the contrary feel no + small amount of sympathy for the suffering wretch? I + imagine that there was something about the tilt of my + tail and the glance in my eye that communicated my + compassion to the Dog, for the next day he seemed a + trifle more considerate of my preferences than had been + his wont. I construed this as a species of thankfulness + on his part. (Yet I would not lay too great stress on this; + he may merely have had an attack of the blues, as a result + of his recent misadventure.) And how comes it, + farther, that I felt considerably nettled the other day + when the neighbor’s boy kicked the Dog three times in + succession? Prudence, to be sure, prevented my taking + up an active defence of my friend, but I certainly felt at + least an indefinite impulse in that direction.</p> + + <p>Such incidents seem to argue a genuine vein of fellow + feeling, of sympathy, for the Dog, though, I must insist, + <a class="pagenum" id="page209" title="209"> </a>this sympathy never degenerates into a maudlin sentimentality. + After all is said and done, there is never entirely + absent a grain of contempt from my estimate of a mere + dog, even of the Dog of the House. It is enough to admit + that there is commingled with this contempt a certain + something of more benevolent hue, a something which + I must leave it to others to explain.</p> + + <h3 id="casserole_4">A Hunting-ground of Ignorance</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">Espapia Palladino</span> is dead, and of course the usual + amount of nonsense is being written about her. The + woman certainly had some telekinetic power, and she + certainly pieced it out with humbug, as is generally done + when the power happens to exist in a low order of person. + And as most persons are of a low order, the power is so + pieced out in most cases. The same is of course true regarding + telepsychic power.</p> + + <p>But that behind the frauds and mistakes there is something + genuine yet to be accounted for, is doubted by hardly + anybody who knows anything about the subject. If + writing about it, and all other subjects, could only be + restricted to those who know something about them, how + much better off we should all be!</p> + + <p>And if dishonesty were only restricted to the inferior + type of person! One of the committee who made out + Palladino an unmitigated fraud, told us that he signed + the report with mental reservations, and that he passed + his hands under the table which she held suspended by + her finger-tips on top of it, and found it absolutely disconnected + with the floor!</p> + + <h3 id="casserole_5">Maximum Price-fixing in Ancient Rome</h3> + + <p>“<span class="first_word">Is</span> there anything whereof it may be said, See, this + is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before + us.” The prototype of the aeroplane is found in the + myth of Daedalus’ wings; the possibilities of the submarine—some + <a class="pagenum" id="page210" title="210"> </a>of them—are illustrated in Lucian’s + story of the sea monster; and maximum prices, in sober + Roman history.</p> + + <p>The Emperor Diocletian, at the beginning of the fourth + century, made a serious effort to lower the high cost of + living, by law. He was apparently one of that school of + amateur economists which holds that the business man’s + greed is the root of the evil. In his opinion there were any + number of people who were expert in the art of running + up the rates and charging the poor ultimate consumer, + whether civilian or soldier, all that the traffic would bear. + And his eye was on them. A part of the preface to the + edict which was to abolish all the difficulties at one stroke, + reads thus:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>Who is so dull of heart that he does not know that on merchandise + prices have become more than exorbitant, and that + unbridled greed can not be mitigated by abundance of supplies + or rich harvests? And so to the greed of those who, though + men of the greatest wealth so that they could abundantly + supply even nations, still seek private gain. To their greed, O + people of our provinces, our care for common humanity urges + us to put an end. Who does not know that, wherever the + common safety of all demands that our armies be led, there the + prices of merchandise are forced up, not four times or eight + times, but without limit?</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>A system of maximum retail prices was to be the cure-all:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>We have decided not to determine exact prices for commodities: + for it does not seem just to do this when at times many + provinces glory in the good fortune of low prices; but we have + decided to establish a maximum of prices, so that when there + is any scarcity greed may be checked.</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>If the emperor could have looked down the ages to + the year 1918, he would have found that a maximum + price of ten cents for sugar is very likely to become the + regular price everywhere. He did not know this; but + that his law would only be effective if supported by a + penalty for disobedience, he knew right well. He decided + <a class="pagenum" id="page211" title="211"> </a>on a penalty—a penalty which would appear adequate, + probably even to the thorough-going Germans:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>It is our pleasure that, if anyone in his audacity opposes + this statute, he be subjected to capital punishment.</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>Not only price-raising, but hoarding and speculating + were also held to be opposition to the law. The final + statement of the edict makes this clear:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>And from the penalties of this statute, that man is not free + who, possessing the necessities of life, should think that he + ought to withdraw them from trade for a time after this statute + is in force.</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>But the emperor did not confine himself to fixing maximum + prices for food. His was a more ambitious attempt + than any of its modern counterparts. He fixed prices + for liquors, and cloth goods and shoes. He fixed maximum + wages for workmen in all sorts of trades, and even + for men in the professions. In some cases pay was by + the day, and in some, by the job. The record does not + show that union men were paid more than non-union + men.</p> + + <p>But this economic Utopia, though supported by all the + power of an autocratic government, was not for long. + One slight miscalculation ruined the whole scheme. The + maximum price, or maximum wage, was put quite low in + the first place, and yet in any given case was precisely + the same in every province of the empire. In London + the barber would shave you for two denarii (less than one + cent), and in Alexandria you need pay no more. Prunes + from Damascus must be sold there and in Cologne for + the same price. Under such artificial conditions legitimate + business could not succeed. The result is briefly + told by a church father:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>Then was there much blood shed for trifles; and nothing was + put up for sale, because of fear, and much worse was the scarcity, + until the law was repealed of necessity, after the death of many.</p> + </blockquote> + + <h3 id="casserole_6"><a class="pagenum" id="page212" title="212"> </a>Darwin on His Own Discoveries</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">In</span> connection with the article in this number on John + Fiske, we are fortunate in being able to give a letter from + Darwin to Dana which is just appearing in the current + <cite>American Journal of Science</cite>. To our readers, comment + would be superfluous.</p> + + <blockquote> + <p class="address_line">Charles Darwin to J. D. Dana<br /> + <span class="address">Down, Bromly, Kent, Nov. 11, 1859.</span></p> + + <p><em>My dear Sir</em>: I have sent you a copy of my Book (as yet only + an abstract) on the Origin of species. I know too well that the + conclusion, at which I have arrived, will horrify you, but you + will, I believe & hope, give me credit for at least an honest + search after the truth. I hope that you will read my Book, + straight through; otherwise from the great condensation it will + be unintelligible. Do not, I pray, think me so presumptuous + as to hope to convert you; but if you can spare time to read it + with care, & will then do what is far more important, keep the + subject under my point of view for some little time occasionally + before your mind, I have hopes that you will agree that more + can be said in favour of the mutability of species, than is at + first apparent. It took me many long years before I wholly + gave up the common view of the separate creation of each + species. Believe me, with sincere respect & with cordial thanks + for the many acts of scientific kindness which I have received + from you,</p> + + + <p class="closing">My dear Sir<br /> + Yours very sincerely<br /> + <span class="signature">(Signed) <span class="special_name">Charles Darwin</span></span></p> + </blockquote> + + <h3 id="casserole_7">Reflections of an Old-Maid Aunt.</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">In</span> the elaborately efficient curricula of our modern + colleges, although there are courses of instruction in + almost every branch from Book-agenting to Motherhood, + and from Sewing to Integral Calculus, there is one + of endeavor which is, as yet, hopelessly uncharted. I + speak of the art, or, of course, it should be science, of + being an old-maid aunt!</p> + + <p>It seems a simple matter to the casual observer and, + <a class="pagenum" id="page213" title="213"> </a>perhaps, that is why no one has thought necessary to + study the subject and offer a course. We remember how + successfully it was done in our youth by those delightful + old ladies who came for visits and taught us to knit and + were almost sure to have some sort of confection concealed + somewhere about their person or room. We remember + how they implanted the idea that certain words were + beyond the vocabulary of any lady, and that a child’s + whole duty in life was to be polite in such matters as “Sir” + and “Ma’am”, to be obedient to any of the species, + Grown-People, and to be ready at all times to help in the + search for spectacles. Their lot was easy enough and + the very suggestion that they needed to be instructed in + their capacity of aunt, would be ridiculous!</p> + + <p>It is no wonder then, with that picture in view, that + I launched forth upon a visit to my small nephew and + nieces with no premonitions of the shoals which lay ahead. + After five days in the presence of the strenuous regime + which surrounds and enfolds the modern child, I have + returned once more to the quiet back waters of old-maidenhood + and to contemplation. And now a sadder + and a wiser aunt, I offer some suggestions which might + help another unwary one before she breaks into the + complicated existence of the newly developed genus, + Child.</p> + + <p>In the first place, don’t use that obnoxious word + “DON’T”. Its use you will find, or more likely be told, + curbs the child’s free spirit and destroys his personality. + If, thereof you find him with a redpepper as a toy, don’t + try to take it from him, for being stronger than he you + may succeed and thereby put a dent in his tender young + willpower! Just trust that if he should get it into his + eyes or mouth the result will not be fatal, and feel confident + that thereafter he will seek some other form of toy! + Or should you find him standing on a chair, before a + blazing fire, reaching for something on the mantel piece, + don’t remove him forcibly at once and try to convince + <a class="pagenum" id="page214" title="214"> </a>him that he should never get there again. No! Rather + divert his mind to something else in the room so that he + will get down of his own accord, and leave the desired + object until there is nobody present to divert him! + For do you not see that if you tell him that there are + things in the world which he cannot do, you will bind + his free and birdlike soul and sadden his little life? Be + comforted, though, for, perhaps, when he does fall + the fire will be out, or the chair will tip the other + way!</p> + + <p>In the second place don’t be surprised to hear him cry, + nay rather howl lustily, all the while he is being fed. Of + course you think at once that he must surely be ill; in + your memories of childhood such an occurrence meant + only some dread disease. But before you send a hurried + call for the doctor, take a look at the food. You will + find that a sad and terrible change has come over the + stomachs of children! No longer can they digest oatmeal + when accompanied by its time-honored companions, + sugar and cream, but must eat it plain in a luke warm + state. Other cereals have also lost these erstwhile friends, + in spite of the alluring but deceptive impression which + you may have gotten from advertisements, and are eaten, + or rather absorbed, for the doing has lost its gusto, plain. + So don’t pity the child when you see him eating a teaspoonful + of sugar just before he goes to bed, for that is his + theoretical dole of sweetness for the day. Just hope + that somewhere in the background is a friendly cook who + is not yet aware of the fact that children have lost their + powers of digestion!</p> + + <p>And most important of all, don’t offer him any sort of + refreshment, most particularly not the innocent-looking + but deadly animal cracker! When Mrs. Noah, for it must + have been she who invented that confection for the small + voyage-wearied Ham, Shem, and Japheth, made the first + animal crackers, she probably thought that she was doing + a great thing and that children throughout the age would + <a class="pagenum" id="page215" title="215"> </a>call her blessed. And so they have until now a fearful + discovery has been made: animal crackers are absolutely + indigestible! We shudder as we think of the menageries + we ourselves have consumed! To what heights of perfection + might our excellent health have risen, were it not + for those wolves lurking in the form of sheep or elephants + or overgrown curly-tailed dogs! To what size might our + present too rotund forms have grown, were it not for + those deadly processions marched hither and yon and then + eaten in never varying order, head; tail, when present; + feet; and then two bites on the body. Farewell, Animal + Cracker, you are discovered at last! No more shall you + with your treachery delight and entertain innocent little + children, unless some fathers, defiant of the new laws of + nature and the edicts of scientific mothers, procure you + on the sly!</p> + + <p>And so it goes. No! The duties of an old-maid aunt + cannot be entered upon lightly. It would really be a + charitable act for some one to study the subject and offer + a course for those of us the numbers of whose nephews + and nieces continue to increase. And we in the meantime + can only hope that the pendulum of change will not + delay too long in swinging back to the old-fashioned child, + about whom, inside and out, we have a little knowledge + if it is only empirical!</p> + + <h3 id="casserole_8">An Obscure Source of Education</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">Obviously</span> a great deal of education, moral as well + as intellectual, and even physical, is coming from the + war, and it obviously comes in part from an immensely + increased amount of reading on informing subjects, + even in the newspapers. But the call for this reading + contains a farther, and relatively obscure, source of + education worth thinking of. We can no longer risk + wasting our time, as it is to be feared most of us have + done, by picking up to read the first thing that strikes + <a class="pagenum" id="page216" title="216"> </a>our fancy. The greatly increased mass of material has + forced upon us the habit of selecting what we read. The + usefulness and importance of that habit hardly need + dwelling upon to the constituency of this <span class="special_name">Review</span>.</p> + + <h3 id="casserole_9">Heart-to-Heart Advertising</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">I am</span> all things to all advertisers. I like to submit myself + to the experiments of some alert young psychologist, + in response to whose plan (scientifically conceived, artfully + presented), I greatly desire to eat, to see, to hear, + to know, to do, to possess, that which he brings to my + attention. Being a person trained to jejune classification, + I automatically pigeon-hole the “appeal,” and my mind + therefore offers to advertisements a hospitable retreat + under Ambition, or Culture, or Physical development, + or the Senses, or Vanity.</p> + + <p>The last quality and the first are not always distinguishable, + the one from the other. When a page of insinuating + text and startling illustration assures me that + the reading of a specified set of books will enable me,—a + person temperamentally shy and physically inconspicuous—to + convince judges and jurors, and to combine + into a glorious whole the abilities of St. Chrysostom, + Abelard, Shylock, Daniel Webster, and a Confederate + veteran, I am disposed to feel that though hitherto I have + been unappreciated, it now rests with me (and the set of + books) to alter, even to change, the opinion of my personal + public. I glow, too, under the conviction that correspondence + courses can transform me into a trained nurse, an + O. Henry, a Thomas Nast. My vanity makes the conventional + years of hospital service, or a “born” ability to + tell a story, or to caricature, seem superfluous in an equipment + for success. And I am sure I could raise wheat and + apples in the north and oranges and pecans in the south, + even though I should bring to my enterprise no capital, + no experience, no commonsense.</p> + + <p><a class="pagenum" id="page217" title="217"> </a>But while I yield readily and sympathetically to the + magazine advertisement, my heartiest response is given + to the letter that altruistically offers me counsels of perfection. + There is a certain lack of privacy about the + magazine advertisement; but the letter advertisement is + confidential, even sometimes secretive. True, my name + is frequently misspelled, my sex is changed, and the ink + and type are glaringly different in the heading and in the + letter proper. But these are trifling vagaries: it is my own + letter, and the writer knows me intimately. He says this + plainly. And he proves it by offering me the book, or the + beautifier, or the investment which I had not even known + I wanted, but which I do want instantly, and with an + intensity that falls short only of cutting from the lower + corner of the page the slanting coupon that will procure + me farther information.</p> + + <p>It is this intimacy of attitude on the part of the writers + of form-letters that gives me keenest pleasure. I like the + way in which a kindly, tolerant young person—youth + will always out—assures me that my manner of life and + my personal predilections are as an open book to him. + I like the first-aid flavor of his opening paragraph. I + like most of all the jaunty soul-brother way in which he + dallies with his point.</p> + + <p>“The writer of this letter has been pondering a good + deal”, begins one of these experts in the personal appeal, + “on the sort of letter he would like to get from So-and-So.” + And at the conclusion of his clever page, he inquires ingenuously + (or artistically): “Is this the sort of letter <em>you</em> + like to get from So-and-So?” Bless the boy! of course it is.</p> + + <p>And I do enjoy the letter that is designed to make me + leap from my seat with the first line: “Tomorrow may be + too late!” or, “This idea was worth $100 to one person—it + may prove even more valuable to you;” or, “Shakespeare + died in 1616!”</p> + + <p>Again, the subject may be approached obliquely: “You + have read of course, the interesting story in the <cite>Sunday + <a class="pagenum" id="page218" title="218"> </a>Morning Sunshine</cite>, entitled “Sparkles.” You’ll remember + how Dorothy—” And about the middle of page two I + find that the reason why the heroine was a heroine was + because she had a piece of furniture, the duplicate of which + I am granted an opportunity to purchase, if I act quickly, + at greatly reduced rates.</p> + + <p>But although the letter-writing section of psychological + advertisers gives me keen pleasure, they also give me some + anxiety. It seems to me that they waste a good deal of + good effort. The reason for this failure to conserve, lies, + I think, in the lack of an ingredient that would fuse all of + this experimental psychology and engaging personality + into a practical working whole. And by “working” I + mean money getting: for of course advertisers have their + reason for being, in the persuading of somebody to buy + something, or to subscribe to something. The ingredient + which I miss is businesslike accuracy. Of course I realize + that these are merely form-letters, that the mailing list + is compiled from any available source. But the advertisers + wish each person who receives a letter to feel that it was + written for him or her personally, and they take a great + deal of trouble to perfect the atmosphere. It is not + artistic, or professional, therefore, to destroy the illusion + by the address or the opening sentence. It was a disgusted + gentleman who received a letter which began thus:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>“Dr. John Doe<br /> + Professor of Latin<br /> + University of Utopia</p> + + <p>Dear Sir:</p> + + <p>A friend of yours—she prefers that we should + not use her name—tells us that you are the best dressed + woman in your city. Our new line of evening frocks….”</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>And women often receive letters such as the following:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>“Miss Margaret Roe, etc., etc.</p> + + <p>Dear Madam:</p> + + <p>As a man who knows a good pipe from a + <a class="pagenum" id="page219" title="219"> </a>bad one, will you grant us an opportunity to show + you….”</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>Undoubtedly these charming highly imaginative specialists + in advertising give great pleasure. But when business + houses month after month send advertising letters + which set forth the glories of something glaringly impossible + of enjoyment by the person to whom the letter is + addressed, then that person is likely to reflect that squandered + postage, and inefficient management, must be paid + for in the price or quality of the thing advertised.</p> + + <p>The literary value of a personal form-letter is not + affected, however, by the question of practical usefulness. + Nothing could lessen my pleasure in a recent letter that + shows me how I may realize the “chummy comradeship + of Emerson’s nature poems,” and the “dainty art of + Shelley and Keats.” The writer also tells me that he + knows what my principal problem is. And the opening + sentence of the same letter seems to explain why I enjoy + all advertisements:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>“To that ‘marvellous interestingness of life’ which + Arnold Bennett says literature reflects, is due the fundamental + liking for good reading of some kind….”</p> + </blockquote> + + <h3 id="casserole_10">The Curse of Fall Elections</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">We</span> have received the usual number of exhortations + to do our duty in preparing for the fall elections. Thank + you. We will do the best we can, but on account of the + war we are already late in getting into the country for + the summer, and our doctor orders us away as soon as + we can go.</p> + + <p>Many of the people who exercise any influence for good + are gone already, while most of those whose influence is + evil—who live by politics are here and will stay here or + within easy reach, to attend to business.</p> + + <p>Moreover all those whose laziness, incapacity and + crankiness prevent their having money enough to get + <a class="pagenum" id="page220" title="220"> </a>away—the whole Bolshevik crowd of socialists, synadicalists + and anarchists, remain here under the influence of + those who live by politics.</p> + + <p>If there ever was an invention of the devil, it is fall + elections.</p> + + <p>Elections should be held early in April, before so many + good people go away, and after they have had half the + year at home to do their best in.</p> + + <h3 id="casserole_11">Larrovitch</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">Our</span> habitual readers may be surprised at our serving + them a book notice. But the circumstances leading to + this one are peculiar.</p> + + <p>In its thirty-six years, the Authors Club has published + but two books: <cite>The Liber Scriptorum</cite>, and <cite>Feodor Vladimir + Larrovitch, An Appreciation of His Life and Works</cite>, which + has recently appeared. The name of Larrovitch was + mentioned in the last Casserole; we are now able to describe + the permanent tribute to his personality which + the Authors has made.</p> + + <p>The volume consists of papers read at the Larrovitch + centenary celebration (April 26th, 1917—postponed + from April 1st) together with others since contributed. + The contents page notes a sonnet by Clinton Scollard, + Prolegomenon by Prof. Franklin H. Giddings, a personality + sketch by Wm. George Jordan, translations and an article + on “The Truth and False About Larrovitch” by Richardson + Wright, translations of three Larrovitch poems by + George S. Hellman, translations of Larrovitch letters by + Thomas Walsh, a paper on his recollection of the great + Russian by Dr. Titus Munson Coan, who, it will be recalled + was one of the original “Friends of Russian Freedom,” + bibliography and bibliographical notes by Arthur Colton, + whose name is already well known to readers of the + <span class="special_name">Unpopular Review</span>; and a table of references in English, + French, German, Spanish and Russian compiled by Dr. + <a class="pagenum" id="page221" title="221"> </a>Gustave Simonson. There are twelve illustrations in the + volume, showing Larrovitch manuscripts, portraits at + various ages, portraits of Larrovitch’s parents, the room + at Yalta in which the author died, and his grave. The book + was designed by William Aspenwall Bradley of the + University Press, and executed by Munder of Baltimore, + making it a unique piece of typographical excellence.</p> + + <p>That the Authors should have picked out this Russian + from all the writers whirling in the vortex of literature, + is explained in the preface and the dedication. The book + is dedicated to the lasting sympathy between the American + people and the Russian. And the preface states + that the path to peace along which nations can walk to + mutual understanding, is the path of the arts—the path + of music and painting and literature. This is indeed true.</p> + + <h3 id="casserole_12">Our Index</h3> + + <p><span class="first_word">The</span> example of our “Father Parmenides,” is always + good, and we shall imitate it in the particular set forth in + this extract from <cite>The Atlantic</cite> for last December:</p> + + <blockquote> + <p>Following a convention, unquestioned and well-nigh universal, + the <cite>Atlantic</cite> has for sixty years published semi-annually + in December and June an index designed for the convenience + of readers who bind their magazines. This index with title-page + occupies six pages; and while of great service to a couple + of thousand subscribers and to a few hundred libraries, it is to + eighty-odd thousand readers [These figures make us feel very + small.] merely a dead and cumbersome weight. This month, + therefore, we are breaking sharply with tradition, … we are + printing the index in its usual form, but in a small edition, and + as a separate pamphlet, and hold ourselves ready to send it to + <em>any reader who applies for a copy within thirty days of the publication + of this magazine</em>.</p> + + <p>This change will involve the saving of a paper-wastage….</p> + </blockquote> + + <p>All paper saved tends to lower the price, which has already + reached a height obstructive to the diffusion of + knowledge.</p> + </div> + + <div id="backmatter"><a class="pagenum disguise" id="page222" title="222"> </a> + <p class="a_p_1">A New “OUIJA Board” Book</p> + + <p class="a_p_2">By PATIENCE WORTH</p> + + <p class="a_p_3">HOPE TRUEBLOOD</p> + + <p class="a_p_4">A Mid-Victorian Novel by a Pre-Victorian Writer</p> + + <p class="a_p_5">By the author of “The Sorry Tale”<br /> + Edited by C. S. Yost</p> + + <p class="a_p_6">$1.50 net</p> + + <p class="a_p_7">In this new novel of mid-Victorian days with its + pervading sense of dark mystery, “Patience Worth” + abandons her archaic dialect, and writes in modern + English.</p> + + <p class="a_p_8">“Whether in the body or in the spirit, the + author of the present volume is singularly + gifted with imagination, invention and + power of expression. ‘Hope Trueblood’ is + much superior to ‘The Sorry Tale,’ partly + because it is written in good English and + partly because it displays far greater ingenuity + of imagination … a work approximating + absolute genius.”—<cite>N. Y. Tribune.</cite></p> + + <p class="a_p_8">“A novel that George Eliot might not + have been ashamed to own up to.”—<cite>N. + Y. Sun.</cite></p> + + <p class="a_p_8">“From the very first there is established + an atmosphere true to type and convincing. + ‘Hope’ is one of the most radiant children + we’ve met in a book in many a day. + ‘Patience Worth’ has arrived.”—<cite>Chicago + Daily News.</cite></p> + + <p class="a_p_9"><span class="a_s_1">HENRY HOLT & COMPANY</span><br /> + 19 WEST 44th STREET <span class="a_s_2"> </span> NEW YORK</p> + </div> + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of Project Gutenberg's The Unpopular Review, Number 19, by Various + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE UNPOPULAR REVIEW, NUMBER 19 *** + +***** This file should be named 38514-h.htm or 38514-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/8/5/1/38514/ + +Produced by Barbara Tozier, Bill Tozier and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> + |