diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:09:55 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:09:55 -0700 |
| commit | c1bf8d15cf6889c1a73c50b2e24f69ab0a6c5a31 (patch) | |
| tree | 00ef4f26de83a4cbe9e05cd8546f681dcb731d7b /38273-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '38273-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 38273-h/38273-h.htm | 1259 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38273-h/images/emblem.png | bin | 0 -> 7449 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38273-h/images/title-page.jpg | bin | 0 -> 39894 bytes |
3 files changed, 1259 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/38273-h/38273-h.htm b/38273-h/38273-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..46e8b83 --- /dev/null +++ b/38273-h/38273-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,1259 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" +"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8"/> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css"/> +<title>Is the Bible Indictable?, by Annie Besant—A Project Gutenberg eBook</title> +<link rel="coverpage" href="images/title-page.jpg"/> +<style type="text/css"> +<!-- +p +{ + text-align: justify; + text-indent: 1.5em; +} + +p.center, +p.no-indent, +#tnote p, +#tnote-bottom p +{ + text-indent: 0; +} + +h1 +{ + text-align: center; + clear: both; + font-weight: normal; + font-size: x-large; + margin: 6em auto 1em auto; +} + +a:link, +a:visited +{ + text-decoration: none; +} + +ins +{ + text-decoration: none; + border-bottom: 1px dashed #add8e6; +} + +.center +{ + text-align: center; +} + +.figcenter +{ + margin: 4em auto; +} + +.small-caps +{ + font-variant: small-caps; +} + +a[title].pagenum +{ + position: absolute; + right: 3%; +} + +a[title].pagenum:after +{ + content: attr(title); + border: 1px solid silver; + display: inline; + font-size: x-small; + text-align: right; + color: #808080; + background-color: inherit; + font-style: normal; + padding: 1px 4px 1px 4px; + font-variant: normal; + font-weight: normal; + text-decoration: none; + text-indent: 0; + letter-spacing: 0; +} + +#tnote, +#tnote-bottom +{ + text-align: justify; + padding: 0 0.75em; + margin: 6em auto; +} + +ul#corrections +{ + list-style-type: none; + margin: 0; + padding: 0; +} + +ul#corrections li +{ + margin: 0.5em 0.25em; +} + +ul#corrections .correction +{ + text-decoration: underline; +} + +@page +{ + margin: 0.25em; +} + +@media screen +{ + body + { + width: 80%; + max-width: 40em; + margin: auto; + } + + p + { + margin: 0.75em auto; + } + + #tnote, + #tnote-bottom + { + border: 1px dashed #808080; + background-color: #fafafa; + } + + #tnote, + #tnote-bottom + { + max-width: 26em; + } + + .page-break + { + margin-top: 8em; + } +} + +@media print, handheld +{ + p + { + margin: 0; + } + + #tnote p, + #tnote-bottom p + { + margin: 0.25em 0; + } + + #tnote .screen, + .pagenum + { + display: none; + } + + ins + { + border: none; + } + + a:link, + a:visited + { + color: black; + } + + #tnote, + #tnote-bottom, + h1, + .page-break + { + page-break-before: always; + } + + #tnote-bottom + { + page-break-after: always; + } +} + +@media handheld +{ + body + { + margin: 0; + padding: 0; + width: 95%; + } + + #corrections li + { + margin: 0; + } +} +--> +</style> +<!--[if lt IE 8]> +<style type="text/css"> +a[title].pagenum +{ + position: static; +} +</style> +<![endif]--> +</head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Is the Bible Indictable?, by Annie Besant + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Is the Bible Indictable? + Being an Enquiry whether the Bible Comes within the Ruling + of the Lord Chief Justice as to Obscene Literature + +Author: Annie Besant + +Release Date: December 11, 2011 [EBook #38273] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IS THE BIBLE INDICTABLE? *** + + + + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Jana Srna and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive) + + + + + + +</pre> + + + +<div id="tnote"> +<p class="center"><b>Transcriber's Notes:</b></p> + +<p>Every effort has been made to replicate this text as faithfully +as possible, including inconsistencies in spelling and hyphenation.</p> + +<p>Some corrections of spelling and punctuation have been made. +<span class="screen">They are marked <ins title="transcriber's note">like +this</ins> in the text. The original text appears when hovering the cursor +over the marked text.</span> A <a href="#tn-bottom">list of amendments</a> is +at the end of the text.</p> +</div> + +<h1>IS THE BIBLE INDICTABLE?</h1> + +<p class="center" style="line-height: 1.6;">BY<br/> +<big>ANNIE BESANT.</big></p> + +<p class="center">BEING AN ENQUIRY WHETHER THE BIBLE COMES +WITHIN THE RULING OF THE LORD CHIEF +JUSTICE AS TO OBSCENE LITERATURE.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 100px;"> +<img src="images/emblem.png" width="100" height="128" alt=""/> +</div> + +<p class="center" style="line-height: 1.4;">LONDON:<br/> +FREETHOUGHT PUBLISHING COMPANY,<br/> +<span class="small-caps">28, Stonecutter Street, E.C.</span></p> + +<p class="center">PRICE TWOPENCE.</p> + +<p class="center page-break" style="line-height: 1.4;">LONDON:<br/> +PRINTED BY ANNIE BESANT AND CHARLES BRADLAUGH,<br/> +28, STONECUTTER STREET, E.C.</p> + +<p class="center page-break" style="font-size: x-large;"><a class="pagenum" name="Page_3" title="3"> </a>IS THE BIBLE INDICTABLE?</p> + +<p class="center" style="font-size: large;">AN ENQUIRY WHETHER THE BIBLE COMES WITHIN +THE RULING OF THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE +AS TO OBSCENE LITERATURE.</p> + +<p class="no-indent"><span class="small-caps">The</span> ruling of Sir Alexander Cockburn in the late trial, the +Queen <i>against</i> Bradlaugh and Besant, seems to involve +wider issues than the Lord Chief Justice intended, or than +the legal ally of Nature and Providence can desire. The +question of motive is entirely set on one side; the purest +motives are valueless if the information conveyed is such as +is capable of being turned to bad purposes by the evil-minded +and the corrupt. This view of the law would not +be enforced against expensive medical works; provided that +the price set on a book be such as shall keep it out of reach +of the “common people,” its teaching may be thoroughly +immoral but it is not obscene. Dr. Fleetwood Churchill, +for instance, is not committing an indictable offence by +giving directions as to the simplest and easiest way of procuring +abortion; he is not committing a misdemeanour, +although he points out means which any woman could +obtain and use for herself; he does not place himself within +reach of the law, although he recommends the practice of +abortion in all cases where previous experience proves that +the birth of a living child is impossible. A check to population +which destroys life is thus passed over as legal, perhaps +because the destruction of life is the check so largely +employed by Nature and Providence, and would thus ensure +the approval of the Solicitor-General. But the real reason +why Dr. Churchill is left unmolested and Dr. Knowlton +is assailed, lies in the difference of the price at which +the two are severally published. If Dr. Knowlton was +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_4" title="4"> </a> +sold at 10s. 6d. and Dr. Churchill at 6d., then +the vials of legal wrath would have descended on the +advocate of abortion and not on the teacher of prevention. +The obscenity lies, to a great extent, in the price of the book +sold. A vulgar little sixpence is obscene, a dainty half-sovereign +is respectable. Poor people must be content to +remain ignorant, or to buy the injurious quack treatises +circulated in secret; wealthier people, who want knowledge +less, are to be protected by the law in their purchases of +medical works, but if poor people, in sore need, finding +“an undoubted physician” ready to aid them, venture to +ask for his work, written especially for them, the law strikes +down those who sell them health and happiness. They +must not complain; Nature and Providence have placed +them in a state of poverty, and have mercifully provided for +them effectual, if painful, checks to population. The same +element of price rules the decency or the indecency of +pictures. A picture painted in oils, life size, of the naked +human figure, such as Venus disrobed for the bath, or +Phryne before her judges, or Perseus and Andromeda, +exhibited to the upper classes, in a gallery, with a shilling +admission charge, is a perfectly decent and respectable work +of art. Photographs of those pictures, uncoloured, and +reduced in size, are obscene publications, and are seized as +such by the police. Cheapness is, therefore, an essential +part of obscenity.</p> + +<p>If a book be cheap, what constitutes it an obscene book? +Lord Campbell, advocating in Parliament the Act against +obscene literature which bears his name, laid down very +clearly his view of what should, legally, be an obscene work. +It must be a work “written for the single purpose of +corrupting the morals of youth, and of a nature calculated +to shock the feelings of decency in any well-regulated +mind” (Hansard, vol. 146, No. 2, p. 329). The law, +according to him, was never to be levelled even against +works which might be considered immoral and indecent, +such as some of those of Dryden, Congreve, or Rochester. +“The keeping, or the reading, or the delighting in such +things must be left to taste, and was not a subject for legal +interference;” the law was only to interpose where the motive +of the seller was bad; “when there were people who +designedly and industriously manufactured books and prints +with the intention of corrupting the public morals, and when +they succeeded in their infamous purpose, he thought it was +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_5" title="5"> </a> +necessary for the legislature to interpose” (Hansard, vol. 146, +No. 4, p. 865).</p> + +<p>The ruling of the present Lord Chief Justice in the late +trial is in direct opposition to the view taken by Lord +Campbell. The chief says: “Knowlton goes into physiological +details connected with the functions of the generation +and procreation of children. The principles of this +pamphlet, with its details, are to be found in greater +abundance and distinctness in numerous works to which +your attention has been directed, and, having these details +before you, you must judge for yourselves whether there is +anything in them which is calculated to excite the passions +of man and debase the public morals. If so, every medical work +is open to the same imputation” (Trial, p. 261). The Lord Chief +Justice then refers to the very species of book against which +Lord Campbell said that he directed his Act. “There are +books,” the chief says, “which have for their purpose the +exciting of libidinous thoughts, and are intended to give to +persons who take pleasure in that sort of thing the impure +gratification which the contemplation of such thoughts is +calculated to give.” If the book were of that character it +“would be condemnable,” and so far all are agreed as to the +law. But Sir Alexander Cockburn goes further, and here is +the danger of his interpretation of the law: “Though the +intention is not unduly to convey this knowledge, and gratify +prurient and libidinous thoughts, still, if its effect is to excite +and create thoughts of so demoralising a character to the +mind of the reader, the work is open to the condemnation +asked for at your hands” (Trial, p. 261). Its effect on what +reader? Suppose a person of prurient mind buys Dr. +Carpenter's “Human Physiology,” and reads the long chapter, +containing over 100 pages, wholly devoted to a minute description +of generation; the effect of the reading will be “to +excite and create thoughts of” the “demoralising character” +spoken of. According to the Lord Chief Justice's ruling, Dr. +Carpenter's would then become an obscene book. The evil +motive is transferred from the buyer to the seller, and then +the seller is punished for the buyer's bad intent; vicarious +punishment seems to have passed from the church into the +law court. There can be no doubt that every medical book +now comes under the head of “obscene literature,” for they +may all be read by impure people, and will infallibly have +the <ins title="affect">effect</ins> of arousing prurient thoughts; that they are written +for a good purpose, that they are written to cure disease, is +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_6" title="6"> </a> +no excuse; the motive of the writer must not be considered; +the law has decided that books whose intention is to +convey physiological knowledge, and that not unduly, are obscene, +if the reader's passions chance to be aroused by +them; “we must not listen to arguments upon moral obligations +arising out of any motive, or out of any desire to +benefit humanity, or to do good to your species” (Trial, +p. 237). The only protection of these, otherwise obscene, +books lies in their price; they are generally highly-priced, +and they do thus lack one essential element of obscenity. +For the useful book that bad people make harmful must be +cheap in order to be practically obscene; it must be within +reach of the poor, and be “capable of being sold at the +corners of the streets, and at bookstalls, to every one who +has sixpence to spare” (Trial, p. 261).</p> + +<p>The new ruling touches all the dramatists and writers that +Lord Campbell had no idea of attacking; no one can doubt +that many of Congreve's dramas are calculated to arouse sexual +passion; these are sold at a very low price, and they +have not even the defence of conveying any useful information; +they come most distinctly within the ruling of the +Lord Chief Justice; why are they to be permitted free +circulation? Sterne, Fielding, Smollett, Swift, must all be flung +into the dusthole after Congreve, Wycherley, Jonson; +Dryden, of course, follows these without delay, and +Spencer, with his “Faerie Queene,” is the next victim. +Shakespeare can have no quarter shown him; not only are most +gross passages scattered through his works, but the motive +of some of them is directly calculated to arouse the +passions; for how many youthful love fevers is not “Romeo +and Juliet” answerable; what of “Cymbeline,” “Pericles,” +or “Titus Andronicus”? Can “Venus and Adonis” tend +to anything except to the rousing of passion? is “Lucrece” +not obscene? Yet Macmillan's Globe Edition of Shakespeare +is regarded as one of the most admirable publishing +efforts made by that eminent firm to put English masterpieces +in the hands of the poor. Coming to our time, what +is to be done with Byron? “Don Juan” is surely calculated +to corrupt, not to speak of other poems, such as “Parisina.” +What of Shelley, with his “Cenci?” Swinburne, must of +course, be burned at once. Every one of these great +names is now branded as obscene, and, under the ruling of +the Lord Chief Justice every one of them must be condemned. +Suppose some one should follow Hetherington's +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_7" title="7"> </a> +example? Suppose that we should become the prosecutors +instead of the prosecuted? Suppose that we should drag +others to share our prison, and should bring the most honoured +names of authors into the same condemnation that +has struck us? Why should we show to others a consideration +that has not been shown to us? If it is said +that we should not strike, we answer; “Then leave <em>us</em> +alone, and calculate the consequences before you touch +us again.” The law has been declared by the Lord Chief +Justice of England; why is not that law as binding on Macmillan +as on us? The law has been narrowed in order to +enmesh Freethought: its net will catch other fishes as well, +or else break under the strain and let all go free. The +Christians desire to make two laws, and show their hands +too plainly: one law is to be strict, and is to apply wholly +to Freethinkers; cheating Christians, who sell even Knowlton, +are to be winked at by the authorities, and are to be let +off scot free; but this is not all. Ritualists circulate a book +beside which Knowlton is said to be purity itself, and the +law does not touch them; no warrants are issued for their +apprehension; no prosecution is paid for by a hidden +enemy; no law-officer of the Crown is briefed against them. +Why is this? because to attack Christians is to draw attention +to the foundation of Christianity; because to attack the +“Priest in Absolution” is to attack Moses. The Christian +walls are made out of Bible-glass, and they fear to throw +stones lest they should break their own house. Listen to +Mr. Ridsdale, a brother of the Holy Cross: “I wonder,” +he says, “why some one does not stand up in the House of +Lords and bring a charge against the Bible (especially Leviticus) +as an immoral book.” The <cite>Church Times</cite>, the organ +of the Ritualists, has a letter which runs thus: “Suppose a +patrician and a pontifex in old Rome had with care and +deliberation extracted sentences from Holy Writ, separated +them from their context, suppressed the general nature +and character of the book, and then accused the bishop +and his clergy of deliberately preparing an obscene +book to contaminate the young (how readily he might +have made such extracts!), what should we have said of +such ruffians?” This, then, is the shield of the clergy; +the Bible is itself so obscene that Christians fear to prosecute +priests who circulate obscenity.</p> + +<p>Does the Bible come within the ruling of the Lord Chief +Justice as to obscene literature? Most decidedly it does, +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_8" title="8"> </a> +and if prosecuted as an obscene book, it must necessarily be +condemned, if the law is justly administered. Every +Christian ought therefore to range himself on our side, and +demand a reversal of the present rule, for under it his own +sacred book is branded as obscene, and may be prosecuted +as such by any unbeliever.</p> + +<p>First, the book is widely circulated at a low price. If the +Bible were restricted in its circulation by being sold at +10s. 6d. or a guinea, it might escape being placed in the +category of obscene literature under the present ruling. +But no such defence can be pleaded for it. It is sold at +8d. a copy, printed on cheap paper, and strongly bound, for +use in schools; it is given away by thousands among the +“common people,” whose morals are now so carefully looked +after in the matter of books; it is presented to little children +of both sexes, and they are told to read it carefully. +To such an extent is this carried, that some thousands of +children assembled together were actually told by Lord +Sandon, the Vice-President of the Committee of Council on +Education, to read the Bible right through from beginning +to end, and were bidden not to pick and choose. The element +of price is clearly against the Bible if it be proved to +have in it anything which is of a nature calculated to suggest +impure thoughts.</p> + +<p>As to the motives of the writers, we need not trouble +about them. The law now says that intention is nothing, +and no desire to do good is any excuse for obscenity (Trial, +p. 257).</p> + +<p>There remains the vital question: is the effect of some of +its passages to excite and create demoralising thoughts? +(Trial, p. 261).</p> + +<p>The difficulty of dealing with this question is that +many of the quotations necessary to prove that the Bible +comes under the ruling of the Lord Chief Justice are +of such an extremely coarse and disgusting character, that +it is really impossible to reproduce them without intensifying +the evil which they are calculated to do. While I +see no indecency in a plain statement of physiological +facts, written for people's instruction, I do see indecency +in coarse and indelicate stories, the reading of which can do +no good to any human being, and can have no effect save +that of corrupting the mind and suggesting unclean +ideas. I therefore refuse to soil my pages with quotations, +and content myself with giving the references, so that anyone +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_9" title="9"> </a> +who desires to use the ruling of the Lord Chief Justice +to suppress the Bible may see what certainty of success +awaits him if justice be done. I shall not trouble about +simple coarseness, such as Gen. iv. 1, 17, 25; Gen. vi. 4; +or Matt. i. 18–20, 25. If mere coarseness of expression +were to be noted, my task would be endless. But let the +intending prosecutor read the following passages. A little +boy of 8 or 10 would scarcely be improved by reading Gen. +ix. 20–25; the drunkenness, indecency, and swearing in +these six verses is surely calculated to corrupt the boy's +mind. The teaching of Gen. xvi. 1–5 is scarcely elevating +for the “common people,” seeing the example set by the +“friend of God.” Gen. xvii. 10–14 and 23–27 is very coarse. +Would Gen. xix. 4–9 improve a young maiden, or would it +not suggest the most impure thoughts, verse 5 dealing with +an idea that should surely never be put into a girl's +mind? The same chapter, 30–38, is revolting; and Deut. +ii. 9 and 19 implies God's approval of the unnatural +crime. The ignorance of physiology which is thought best +for girls would receive a shock, when in reading the Bible +straight through, the day's portion comprised Gen. xxv., 21–26. +Gen. xxvi., 8 is not nice, nor is Gen. xxix., 21–35, and +Gen. xxx. The story of Dinah, Gen. xxxiv.; of Reuben, +Gen. xxxv., 22; of Onan, Gen. xxxviii., 8–10; of Judah and +Tamar, xxxviii., 13–26; of the birth of Tamar's children, +xxxviii., 27–30, are all revolting in their foulness of phraseology. +Why the Bible should be allowed to tell the story of +Onan seems very strange, and the “righteousness” of Tamar +(v. 26) wins approval. Is this thought purifying teaching for +the “common people”? The story of Joseph and Potiphar's +wife, Gen. xxxix., 7–18, I have heard read in church to the +manifest discomfort of some of the congregation, and the +amusement of others, while Joseph flying from temptation +and leaving his garment with Potiphar's wife is a picture +often seen in Sunday schools. Thus twelve out of the fifty +chapters of Genesis are undeniably obscene, and if there is +any justice in England, Genesis ought to be suppressed. +We pass to Exodus. Ex. i., 15–19 is surely indecent. I am +not dealing with immoral teaching, or God's blessing on the +falsehood of the midwives (20, 21) would need comment. +Ex. iv., 24–26, is very coarse; so also Ex. xxii., 16, 17, 19. +Leviticus is coarse throughout, but is especially so in chaps. +v., 3; xii.; xv.; xviii., 6–23; xx., 10–21; xxii., 3–5. The +trial of jealousy is most revolting in Numb. v., 12–29. +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_10" title="10"> </a> +Numb. xxv., 6–8 is hardly a nice story for a child, nor is that +of Numb. xxxi., 17, 18. Deut. xxi., 10–14 is not pure teaching +for soldiers. Deut. xxii., 13–21 is extremely coarse; the remainder +of the chapter comes also within the Chief's ruling, +as do also chaps. xxiii., 1, 10, 11; xxv., 11, 12; xxvii., 20, +22, 23; xxviii., 57. The fault of the book of Joshua lies +chiefly in its exceeding brutality and bloodthirstiness, but it, +also, does not quite escape the charge of obscenity, as may +be seen by referring to the following passage: chap. v., 2–8. +Judges is occasionally very foul, and is utterly unfit for +general reading, according to the late definition; +Ehud and Eglon, Judges, iii., 15–25, would not bear +reading aloud, and the story might have been +told equally well in decent language. Or take the +horribly disgusting tale of the Levite and his concubine +(Judges xix.), and then judge whether a book containing +such stories is fit for use in schools. Dr. Carpenter's book +may do good there, because, with all its plain speaking, it +conveys useful information; but what good—mental, +physical, or moral—can be done to a young girl by reading +Judges xix.? And the harm done is intensified by the fact +that the ignorance in which girls are kept surrounds such a +story with unwholesome interest, as giving a glimpse into +what is, to them, the great mystery of sex. The story of +Ruth iii. 3–14 is one which we should not like to see +repeated by our daughters; for the virtue of a woman who +should wait until a man was drunk, and then go alone at +night and lie down at his feet, would, in our days, be +regarded as problematical. 1 Sam. ii. 22, and v. 9 are both +obscene; so are 1 Sam. xviii. 25–27 and xxi. 4, 5. +1 Sam. xxv. 22, 34 are disgustingly coarse, and there are +many similar coarse passages to be found in “holy” writ. +2 Sam. vi. 14, 16, 20, is a little over-suggestive, as is also +2 Sam. x. 4. The story of David dancing is told in +1 Chron. xv. 27–29 without anything offensive in its tone. +The story of David and Bathsheba is only too well known, and +as told in 2 Sam. xi. 2–13 is far more calculated to arouse +the passions than is anything in Knowlton. The prophecy +in 2 Sam. xii. 11, 12, fulfilled in xvi. 21, 22, is repulsive in +the extreme, more especially when we are told that the +shameful counsel was given by Ahithophel, whose counsel, +“which he counselled in those days, was as if a man had +inquired at the oracle of God.” If God's oracles give such +counsel, the less they are resorted to the better for the +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_11" title="11"> </a> +welfare of the state. We are next given the odious story of +Amnon and Tamar (2 Sam. xiii. 1–22), instructive for Lord +Sandon's boys and girls to read together, as they go through +the Bible from beginning to end. 1 Kings i. 1–4 conveys +an idea more worthy of George IV. than of the man after +God's own heart. In 1 Kings xiv. 10, the coarseness is inexcusable, +and verse 24 is only too intelligible after Judges xix. +2 Kings ix. 8, xviii. 27, are thoroughly Biblical in their +delicacy. 1 Chron. xix. 4 repeats the unpleasant story of +2 Sam. x. 4; but both 1 and 2 Chronicles are, for the Bible, +remarkably free from coarseness, and are a great improvement +on the books of Kings and Samuel. The same praise +is deserved by Ezra and Nehemiah. The tone of the story +of Esther is somewhat sensual throughout: the drunken +king commanding Vashti to come in and show her beauty, +Esther i. 11; the search for the young virgins, Esther ii. +2–4; the trial and choice, Esther ii. 12–17, these are +scarcely elevating reading; Esther vii. 8 is also coarse. +To a girl whose safety is in her ignorance, Job iii. 11 is very +plain. Psalm xxxviii. 5–7 gives a description of a certain +class of disease in exact terms. Proverbs v. 17–20 is good +advice, but would be condemned by the Lord Chief Justice; +Proverbs vi. 24–32 is of the same character, as is also +Proverbs vii. 5–23. The allusion in Ecclesiastes xi. 5 +would be objected to as improper by the Solicitor-General.</p> + +<p>The Song of Solomon is a marriage-song of the sensual +and luxuriant character: put Knowlton side by side with it, +and then judge which is most calculated to arouse the +passions. It is almost impossible to select, where all is of +so extreme a character, but take i. 2, 13; ii. 4–6, 17; +iii. 1, 4; iv. 5, 6, 11; v. 2–4, 8, 14–16; vii. 2, 3, 6–10, 12; +viii. 1–3, 8–10. Could any language be more alluring, +more seductive, more passion-rousing, than the languid, +uxorious, “linked sweetness long drawn out” of this +Eastern marriage-ode? It is not vulgarly coarse and offensive +as is so much of the Bible, but it is, according to the +ruling of the Lord Chief Justice, a very obscene poem. +One may add that, in addition to the allusions and descriptions +that lie on the surface, there is a multitude of suggestions +not so apparent, but which are thoroughly open to all +who know anything of Eastern imagery.</p> + +<p>After the Song of Solomon, it is a shock to come to the +prophets; it is like plunging into cold water after being in +a hothouse. Unfortunately, with the more bracing atmosphere, +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_12" title="12"> </a> +we find the old brutality coming again to repel us, +and coarse denunciation shocks us, as in Isaiah iii. 17. How +would the Lord Chief Justice have dealt with Isaiah if he +had lived in his day, and acted as is recorded in Isaiah xx., +2–4? He clearly would have put him in a lunatic asylum +(Trial, p. 168). If it were not that there are so many worse +passages, one might complain of the taste shown in the comparison +of Isaiah xxvi. 17, 18; the same may be said of +Isaiah xxxii. 11, 12. In Isaiah xxxvi. 12 we have a repetition +of 2 Kings xviii. 27, which we could well have spared. +In Isaiah lvii. 8, 9, we meet a favourite simile of the Jewish +prophets, wherein God is compared to a husband, and the +people to an unfaithful wife, and the relations between them +are described with a minuteness which can only be fitly +designated by the Solicitor-General's favourite word. Isaiah +lxvi. 7–12 would be regarded as somewhat coarse in an +ordinary book. The prophets get worse as they go on. +Jeremiah i. 5 is the first verse we meet in Jeremiah which the +Solicitor-General would take exception to. We next meet the +simile of marriage, in Jeremiah ii., 20, iii. 1–3, 6–9, verse 9 +being especially offensive. Jer. v. 7, 8, is coarse, as are also +Jer. xi. 15 and xiii. 26, 27. Ought the <ins title="girl's">girls'</ins> schools to read +Jer. xx. 17, 18? But, perhaps, as Ezekiel is coming, it is +hypercritical to object to Jeremiah. Lamentations i. 8, 9, is +revolting, and verse 17 of the same chapter uses an extremely +coarse simile. Ezekiel is the prophet who <ins title="eat">ate</ins> a little book +and found it disagree with him: it seems a pity that he did +not eat a large part of his own, and so prevent it from +poisoning other people. What can be more disgusting than +Ez. iv. 12–15? the whole chapter is absurd, but these +verses are abominable. The prophet seems, like the drawers +of the indictment against us, to take pleasure in piling up +uncomfortable terms, as in Ez. vi. 9. We now come to +a chapter that is obscene from beginning to end, and may, +I think, almost claim the palm of foulness. Let any one +read through Ez. xvi., marking especially verses 4–9, 15–17, +25, 26, 33, 34, 37, 39, and then think of the absurdity of +prosecuting Knowlton for corrupting the morals of the +young, who have this book of Ezekiel put into their hand. +After this, Ez. xviii. 6, 11, and 15 seem quite chaste and +delicate; and no one could object to Ez. xxii. 9–11. +Ez. xxiii. is almost as bad as chapter xvi., especially verses +6–9, 14–21, 29, 41–44. Surely if any book be indictable +for obscenity, the Bible should be the first to be prosecuted. +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_13" title="13"> </a> +I know of no other book in which is to be found such +utterly unredeemed coarseness. The rest of Ezekiel is only +bloodthirsty and brutal, so may, fortunately, be passed over +without further comment. Daniel may be left unnoticed; +and we now come to Hosea, a prophet whose morals were, +to speak gently, peculiar. The “beginning of the word of +the Lord by Hosea,” was the Lord's command as to his +marriage, related in Hosea i. 2; we then hear of his children +by the said wife in the remainder of the chapter, and +in the next chapter we are told, Hosea ii. 2, that the +woman is not his wife, and from verse 2–13 we have an extremely +indecent speech of Hosea on the misdeeds of the +unfortunate creature he married, wherein, verse 4, he complains +of the very fact that God commanded in chap. i. 2. +Hosea iii. 1–3 relates another indecent proceeding on +Hosea's part, and his purchase of another mistress; whether +girls' morals are improved by the contemplation of such +divine commands, is a question that might fairly be urged +on Lord Sandon before he next distributes Bibles to little +children of both sexes. The said girls must surely, as they +study Hosea iv. 10–18, wonder that God expresses his intention +not to punish impurity in verse 14. It is impossible, +in reading Hosea, to escape from the prevailing tone of +obscenity; chaps. v. 3, 4, 7; vi. 9, 10; vii. 4; viii. 9; +ix. 1, 10, 11, 14, 16; xii. 3; xiii. 13, every one of these +has a thought in it that all must regard as coarse, and which +comes distinctly within the ruling of the Lord Chief Justice +as to obscenity; there is scarcely one chapter in Hosea that +does not, with offensive reiteration, dwell on the coarsest +form of wrongdoing of which women are capable. Joel iii. +3 is objectionable in a comparatively slight degree. Amos, +although occasionally coarse, keeps clear of the gross +obscenity of Hosea, as do also Obadiah and Jonah. Micah i. +7, 8, 11, would scarcely be passed by Sir Hardinge Giffard, +nor would he approve Micah iv. 9, 10. Nahum iii. 4–6 +is almost Hoseatic, and Habakkuk ii. 5, 16 runs it close. +The remaining four prophets are sometimes coarse, but +have nothing in them approaching the abominations of the +others, and we close the Old Testament with a sigh of +relief.</p> + +<p>The New Testament has in it nothing at all approaching +the obscenity of the Old, save two passages in Revelation. +The story of Mary and Joseph is somewhat coarse, especially +as told in Matt. i. 18–25. Rom. i. 24–27 is distinctly +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_14" title="14"> </a> +obscene, and 1 Cor. v. 1, vi. 9, 15, 16, 18, would all be +judged indelicate by Her Majesty's Solicitor-General, who +objected to the warnings given by Knowlton against sexual +sin. The whole of 1 Cor. vii. might be thought calculated +to arouse the passions, but the rest of Paul's Epistles may +pass, in spite of many coarse passages, such as 1 Thess. iv. +3–7. Heb. xiii. 4 and 2 Peter ii. 10–18 both come into +the same category, but it is useless to delay on simple +coarseness. Revelation slips into the old prophetic indecency; +Rev. ii. 20–22 and xvii. 1–4 are almost worthy +of Ezekiel.</p> + +<p>Can anyone go through all these passages and have any +doubt that the Bible—supposing it to be unprotected by +statute—is indictable as an obscene book under the ruling +of the Lord Chief Justice? It is idle to plead that the +writers do not approve the evil deeds they chronicle, and +that it is only in two or three cases that God appears to endorse +the sin; no purity of motives on the writers' parts can +be admitted in excuse (Trial, p. 257). These sensuous stories +and obscene parables come directly under the censure of the +Lord Chief Justice, and I invite our police authorities to +show their sense of justice by prosecuting the people who +circulate this indictable book, thereby doing all that in them +lies to vitiate and corrupt the morals of the young. If they +will not do this, in common decency they ought to drop +the prosecution against us for selling the “Fruits of +Philosophy.”</p> + +<p>The right way would be to prosecute none of these +books. All that I have intended to do in drawing attention +to the “obscene” passages in the Bible, is to show that to +deal with the sexual relations with a good object—as is +presumably that of the Bible—should not be an indictable +misdemeanour. I do not urge that the Bible should be +prosecuted: I do urge that it is indictable under the present +ruling; and I plead, further, that this very fact shows how +the present ruling is against the public weal. Nothing could +be more unfortunate than to have a large crop of prosecutions +against the standard writers of old times and of the +present day, and yet this is what is likely to happen, unless +some stop is put to the stupid and malicious prosecution +against ourselves. With one voice, the press of the country—omitting +the <cite>Englishman</cite>—has condemned the “foolish” +verdict and the “vindictive” sentence. When that sentence +is carried out, the real battle will begin, and the blame of +<a class="pagenum" name="Page_15" title="15"> </a> +the loss and the trouble that will ensue must rest on those +who started this prosecution, and on those who shield the +hidden prosecutor. The Christians, at least, ought to join +with us in reversing the ruling of the Lord Chief Justice, +since their own sacred book is one of those most easily +assailable. The purity that depends on ignorance is a +fragile purity; the chastity that depends on ignorance is a +fragile chastity; to buttress up ignorance with prison and +fine is a fatal policy; and I call on those who love freedom +and desire knowledge, to join with us in over-ruling by +statute the new judge-made <ins title="law">law.</ins></p> + +<div id="tnote-bottom"> +<p class="center"><a name="tn-bottom"><b>Transcriber's Note:</b></a></p> +<p>The following is a list of corrections made to the original. The +first passage is the original passage, the second the corrected one.</p> + +<ul id="corrections"> +<li><a href="#Page_5">Page 5</a>:<br/> +the <span class="correction">affect</span> of arousing prurient thoughts; that they are written<br/> +the <span class="correction">effect</span> of arousing prurient thoughts; that they are written +</li> +<li><a href="#Page_12">Page 12</a>:<br/> +Jer. xi. 15 and xiii. 26, 27. Ought the <span class="correction">girl's</span> schools to read<br/> +Jer. xi. 15 and xiii. 26, 27. Ought the <span class="correction">girls'</span> schools to read +</li> +<li><a href="#Page_12">Page 12</a>:<br/> +coarse simile. Ezekiel is the prophet who <span class="correction">eat</span> a little book<br/> +coarse simile. Ezekiel is the prophet who <span class="correction">ate</span> a little book +</li> +<li><a href="#Page_15">Page 15</a>:<br/> +statute the new judge-made <span class="correction">law</span><br/> +statute the new judge-made <span class="correction">law.</span> +</li> +</ul> +</div> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of Project Gutenberg's Is the Bible Indictable?, by Annie Besant + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK IS THE BIBLE INDICTABLE? *** + +***** This file should be named 38273-h.htm or 38273-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/8/2/7/38273/ + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Jana Srna and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/38273-h/images/emblem.png b/38273-h/images/emblem.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8e1c98c --- /dev/null +++ b/38273-h/images/emblem.png diff --git a/38273-h/images/title-page.jpg b/38273-h/images/title-page.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4c2c6c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/38273-h/images/title-page.jpg |
