diff options
Diffstat (limited to '38238-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 38238-h/38238-h.htm | 13082 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38238-h/images/005.jpg | bin | 0 -> 57550 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38238-h/images/006.jpg | bin | 0 -> 50281 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38238-h/images/fax.jpg | bin | 0 -> 94708 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38238-h/images/logom.jpg | bin | 0 -> 2465 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 38238-h/images/sign.jpg | bin | 0 -> 15007 bytes |
6 files changed, 13082 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/38238-h/38238-h.htm b/38238-h/38238-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8c285ad --- /dev/null +++ b/38238-h/38238-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,13082 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> + <title> + The Old Yellow Book, by Anonymous + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +p { + margin-top: .75em; + text-align: left; + margin-bottom: .75em; +} + +.pagenum { + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; +} + +hr.l15 { + width: 15%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; +} +hr.l50 { + width: 50%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; +} + +.center {text-align: center;} + +.right {text-align: right; + margin-right: 5%} + +.left25 {margin-left: 25%;} +.left35 {margin-left: 35%;} +.left45 {margin-left: 45%;} + +.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + +.caption {font-weight: bold; + margin-left: 15%; + margin-right: 15%; + text-align: center; + margin-bottom: 2em; +} + +.figcenter { + margin: auto; + text-align: center; +} + +.figright { + float: right; + clear: right; + margin-left: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-right: 0; + padding: 0; + text-align: center; +} + +.figleft { + float: left; + clear: left; + margin-left: 0; + margin-bottom: 1em; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-right: 1em; + padding: 0; + text-align: center; +} + +table.edition { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + empty-cells: show; + } + +.poem { + margin-left:10%; + margin-right:10%; + text-align: left; +} + +.poem span.i4 { + display: block; + margin-left: 4em; + padding-left: 3em; + text-indent: -3em; +} +.poem span.i6 { + display: block; + margin-left: 6em; + padding-left: 3em; + text-indent: -3em; +} + +.i1 {margin-left: 1em;} +.i4 {margin-left: 4em;} +.i6 {margin-left: 6em;} +.i8 {margin-left: 8em;} +.i10 {margin-left: 10em;} +.o4 {margin-left: -4em;} + +.p2 {margin-top: 2em;} +.p6 {margin-top: 6em;} +.p60 {margin-top: 60em;} + +.b1 {font-size:1.25em;} + +.n0 {font-size:.9em;} + +.s1 {font-size:.8em;} +.s2 {font-size:.7em;} + +.sidenote {width: 20%; + padding-bottom: .5em; + padding-top: .5em; + padding-left: .5em; + padding-right: .5em; + margin-left: 1em; + float: right; + clear: right; + margin-top: 1em; + font-size: smaller; + color: black; background: #eeeeee; + border: solid 1px;} + +table {empty-cells: show; + margin-bottom: .75em; + margin-top: .75em; +} + +.tdr {text-align: right;} +.tdl {text-align: left;} + +.bracket4 {font-size: 420%;} +.bracket2 {font-size: 200%;} + +.tnbox { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + margin-bottom: 8em; + margin-top: auto; + text-align: center; + border: 1px solid; + padding: 1em; + color: black; + background-color: #f6f2f2; + width: 25em;} + +.title_block { + margin-left: 30%; + margin-right: 30%;} + +p.bjust {text-align:justify;} + +.pamphlet { + margin-left: 20%; + width: 60%; + line-height: 150%; + margin-top: 6em; + font-size: 1.1em; +} + +.pamphlet p {text-align: center;} + +#toc { + margin-left: 15%; + width: 60%; + } + +#toc p { + margin-top: 1.5em; + margin-bottom: 0.1em; + text-indent: -1em; +} + +#toc .page { + left: 70%; + position: absolute; + text-align: right; + width: 10em; +} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Old Yellow Book, by Anonymous + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Old Yellow Book + Source of Robert Browning's The Ring and the Book + +Author: Anonymous + +Editor: Charles W. Hodell + +Release Date: December 6, 2011 [EBook #38238] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE OLD YELLOW BOOK *** + + + + +Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Melissa McDaniel and the +Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + +</pre> + + +<div class="tnbox"> +<p class="center"><b>Transcriber's Note:</b></p> +<p>Obvious typographical errors have been corrected. +Inconsistent spelling and hyphenation in the original +document have been preserved.</p> +<p>Frequent reference is made to material not included in this text, often, +but not always indicated by [Citation] or a page reference. +Hyper-links are provided, therefore, only when references are clearly internal.</p> +</div> + +<div class="title_block"> +<p class="b1 center p6">EVERYMAN'S LIBRARY<br /> +EDITED BY ERNEST RHYS</p> + +<p class="b1 center p6">POETRY AND<br /> +THE DRAMA</p> + +<p class="p6 center"><span class="b1">THE OLD YELLOW BOOK</span><br /> +BEING A SUPPLEMENTARY VOLUME TO<br /> +"THE RING AND THE BOOK"<br /> +TRANSLATED AND EDITED BY<br /> +<span class="b1">CHARLES W. HODELL</span></p> + +<p class="p6 bjust">THIS IS NO. 503 OF <i>EVERYMAN'S +LIBRARY</i>. THE PUBLISHERS WILL +BE PLEASED TO SEND FREELY TO ALL +APPLICANTS A LIST OF THE PUBLISHED +AND PROJECTED VOLUMES, ARRANGED +UNDER THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS:</p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="center">TRAVEL * SCIENCE * FICTION<br /> +THEOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY<br /> +HISTORY * CLASSICAL<br /> +FOR YOUNG PEOPLE<br /> +ESSAYS * ORATORY<br /> +POETRY & DRAMA<br /> +BIOGRAPHY<br /> +REFERENCE<br /> +ROMANCE</p> + +<div class="figcenter"> +<img src="images/logom.jpg" width="100" height="58" alt="Printer's Logo" /> +</div> + +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="bjust"> +IN FOUR STYLES OF BINDING: CLOTH, +FLAT BACK, COLOURED TOP; LEATHER, +ROUND CORNERS, GILT TOP; LIBRARY +BINDING IN CLOTH, & QUARTER PIGSKIN</p> + +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="center"><span class="smcap">London</span>: <big>J. M. DENT & SONS,</big> <span class="smcap">Ltd.</span><br /> +<span class="smcap">New York</span>: E. P. DUTTON & CO.</p> +</div> + +<div class="figleft p6"> +<img src="images/005.jpg" width="288" height="450" alt="frontpieceA" /> +<p class="caption"> +POETS<br /> +ARE THE<br /> +TRUMPETS<br /> +WHICH SING<br /> +TO BATTLE ...<br /> +POETS<br /> +ARE THE<br /> +UNACKNOWLEDGED<br /> +LEGISLATORS<br /> +OF THE<br /> +WORLD<br /> +<br /> +SHELLEY</p> +</div> + +<div class="figright p6"> +<img src="images/006.jpg" width="290" height="450" alt="frontpieceB" /> +<p class="caption"> +THE OLD +YELLOW +BOOK:<br /> +<br /> +<i>Source of<br /> +Robert Browning's<br /> +<br /> +THE RING<br /> +& THE BOOK</i><br /> +<br /> +London & Toronto<br /> +J. M. DENT & SONS<br /> +LTD. NEW YORK<br /> +E. P. DUTTON & CO<br /></p> +</div> + +<table class="edition p60" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" summary="editions"> +<tr> +<td><span class="smcap">First Issue of this Edition</span></td> +<td class="tdr">1911</td> +</tr> +<tr> +<td><span class="smcap">Reprinted</span></td> +<td class="tdr">1917</td> +</tr> +</table> + +<p class="p6 center b1">PUBLISHERS' NOTE</p> + +<p class="p2">Some years before his death Browning promised to +leave the <i>Old Yellow Book</i>, together with other +books and manuscripts, to Balliol College, Oxford, +and his son carried out the promise soon after +the poet's decease. The Carnegie Institution of +Washington, D. C., has reproduced the entire book +in photo-facsimile, with translation and editing +by Charles W. Hodell. The Publishers gratefully +acknowledge the kindness and generosity of the +Institution in allowing the translation of the +<i>Yellow Book</i> to be reproduced in the present +volume. They have also to acknowledge their +indebtedness to Professor Hodell for the courtesy +he has shown, and the great help he has given in +editing these volumes. Hitherto the work has +been practically inaccessible to British readers, +and in its new dress it is hoped it will be found +invaluable in interpreting the greatest work of +Robert Browning.</p> + +<p class="center p6 b1">INTRODUCTION</p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">ix</a></span></p> + +<p class="p2">The <i>Old Yellow Book</i> is a soiled and bloody page from the +criminal annals of Rome two centuries ago, saved apparently +by mere chance for the one great artist of modern literature +who could best use it, and who has raised this record of a forgotten +crime to a permanent place in that ideal world of man's +creation where Caponsacchi and Pompilia have joined the +company of Paolo and Francesca, of the Red Cross Knight, of +Imogen, of Marguerite and Faust, and of Don Quixote.</p> + +<p>One June day of 1860, Robert Browning passed from the +Casa Guidi home to enjoy the busy life of Florence. There, +"pushed by the hand ever above my shoulder," he entered +the Piazza of San Lorenzo:</p> + +<p class="poem"> +<span class="i6">crammed with booths,</span> +Buzzing and blaze, noontide and market-time.</p> + +<p>He had brought home from such wanderings many a rare old +tapestry, or picture, or carving from the long artistic past of +the city. This day his eye caught the soiled, vellum-covered +volume, crowded between its insignificant neighbours. "One +glance at the lettered back," declares the poet, "and Stall! a +lira made it mine." All the way home and all day long, he +pored over these pages, until by nightfall he had so mastered +the facts of the case that the whole tragedy lay plain before +his mind's eye.</p> + +<p>The book led him, and leads us, back to the morning of +January 3, 1698, when all Rome was astir with the sensation +of a brutal assassination. The aged Comparini, cut to pieces +in their own home in the very heart of Rome on the evening +before by a band of assassins, were now exposed to the view of +an excited mob of the curious and idle. Pompilia, desperately +wounded, lay a-dying. A police captain and posse were in +pursuit of the criminals, one of whom was a nobleman who +had held office in the household of one of the great cardinals. +Toward night the criminals were brought back to the city, +and were followed through the streets to the prison doors by a +great throng.</p> + +<p>Just seven weeks later and again Rome was throbbing with +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">x</a></span> +excitement. Unwonted crowds were pressing into the Piazza +del Popolo, where gallows and scaffold had been prepared. +At last, up the Corso filed the Brotherhood of Death with their +black gowns and great cross, and behind them, in separate +carts, the five criminals. In the midst of a sea of upturned +faces Guido and his fellows met their end, and the curtain fell.</p> + +<p>The <i>Old Yellow Book</i> is the record of the court procedure of +those seven intervening weeks, and shows us the whole legal +battle fought to save Guido, while Rome looked on with the +fascinated interest which has always attended the great +murder trials. It includes the lawyers' arguments for and +against the accused, together with a part of the evidence +brought into court, and some additional miscellaneous data +on the case. All this had evidently been assembled by the +Florentine lawyer, Cencini, to whom certain letters included +are addressed. He seems to have been interested in the case +as a precedent on an important and much disputed point of +law, "whether and when a husband may kill an adulterous +wife." Cencini may also have had some professional relation +with the Franceschini family at Arezzo. At any rate, he set +the material in order, provided title-page and index, and a +transcript of the record in a criminal case against Pompilia in +the Tuscan courts (pp. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>-<a href="#Page_7">7</a>), and bound it securely in the vellum +cover which conveyed it to the poet's hands more than a +century and a half later.</p> + +<p>Whatever meaning this volume may have as a legal precedent, +it had for Browning, and has for the lay reader, a deep +human interest as the incomplete record of a sordid series of +intrigues for certain properties, ending at last in a fearful +crime.</p> + +<p>Guido Franceschini, scion of a noble but impoverished +Tuscan family, had sought his fortunes in Rome, and had +attained a secretaryship in the household of Cardinal Lauria. +His brother, the Abate Paolo, a shrewd and effective man, +rose much higher, at last attaining important office among the +Knights of St. John. Guido, less astute and less ingratiating, +reached middle life with but scant success, and at last was +left unprovided. With the assistance of Abate Paolo, he +planned to recoup his fortunes by a bourgeois marriage. +Though past forty years of age and of unattractive appearance, +he won, by his noble name and subtle intrigue and falsification, +the thirteen-year-old daughter of the Comparini, of the well-to-do +middle class of Rome. After the marriage in December +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xi" id="Page_xi">xi</a></span> +1693, Pompilia and her parents accompanied Guido back to +Arezzo, where, in the ruinous Franceschini <i>palazzo</i>, the Comparini +had ample opportunity to repent their folly. Bitter +contentions soon arose, and at last the Comparini fled from +the brutalities of their son-in-law, and returned to Rome. +There they published broadcast the sordid poverty and the +ignoble brutality of their persecutors, probably printing and +circulating the affidavit of the servant (pp. <a href="#Page_49">49</a>-<a href="#Page_53">53</a>). Guido +seems to have retorted by circulating the forged letter from +Pompilia (pp. <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>). But they struck a more deadly blow at +the pride of the Franceschini when they revealed that Pompilia +was not their own child, but was of ignominious parentage. +And in the spring of 1694 they brought suit before Judge +Tomati for the recovery of the dowry monies paid to Franceschini—a +bitter humiliation to the greedy poverty of the +Franceschini. It must have been a scandalous suit, bringing +dishonour to both parties as their domestic difficulties were +exposed to the throngs of the curious. In this trial were adduced +the letters of the governor (pp. <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>) and of the Bishop +of Arezzo (p. <a href="#Page_99">99</a>). The Comparini lost their suit, but appealed +to the Rota, and their case was pending for several years, +during which time they may have baited the Franceschini +with spiteful scandals.</p> + +<p>In the meantime, the child-wife, Pompilia, was left in +desperate plight—despised and hated by her husband's family. +Her situation grew intolerable. Guido had evidently determined +to rid himself of her without relaxing his grip on her +property. His brutalities were systematic and cunning. At +last she was driven to flee for her life, and on April 29, 1697, +made her escape under the protection of Caponsacchi, a gallant +young priest. It was a desperate step, gravely reprehensible +in the eyes of the world. The fugitives pressed toward Rome, +but Guido overtook them at Castelnuovo, fifteen miles short +of their destination, and had them arrested.</p> + +<p>At Rome, criminal charges of flight and adultery were +brought against them. This Process of Flight, as it is repeatedly +called in the <i>Yellow Book</i>, continued all through the +summer. It was for their defence in this case that Pompilia +and Caponsacchi made their affidavits (pp. <a href="#Page_90">90</a> and <a href="#Page_95">95</a>), giving +their motives for the flight. At the same time Guido urged +the evidence of the love-letters (pp. <a href="#Page_99">99</a>-<a href="#Page_106">106</a>), which he claimed +to have found at the time of the arrest of the fugitives. In +September, judgment was rendered against Caponsacchi—relegation +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xii" id="Page_xii">xii</a></span> +for three years to Civita Vecchia—a punishment +commensurate with indiscretion rather than with crime. +Pompilia was unsentenced, but was retained for a month in +safekeeping in the nunnery delle Scalette, and was then permitted +to return to the home of her foster-parents, the Comparini, +though still technically a prisoner in this home (p. <a href="#Page_159">159</a>). +Here on December 18 a boy was born.</p> + +<p>On Christmas Eve, Guido reached Rome with four young +rustics, whom he had hired to assist him in the assassination. +For a week he lurked in the villa of his brother, Abate Paolo, +who had left Rome. Then, on the evening of January 2, he +won entrance to the home of the Comparini by using the +name of Caponsacchi. The parents were instantly stabbed +to death, and Pompilia was cut to pieces with twenty-two +wounds. Leaving her for dead, Guido and his cut-throats +fled, as the outcries of the victims had given the alarm. That +night they travelled afoot nearly twenty miles, but were pursued +by the police, and were arrested with the bloody arms +still in their possession.</p> + +<p>Such was the crime, and the <i>Old Yellow Book</i> is the record +of the legal battle over the assassins, which was fought through +the criminal courts of Rome, presided over by Vice-governor +Venturini. The prosecution and defence alike were conducted +by officers of the court, two lawyers on each side, the Procurator +and Advocate of the Poor for the defendants, and the +Procurator and Advocate of the Fisc against them. As the +fact of the crime was definitely ascertained, the legal battle +turned entirely on the justification or condemnation of the +motive of the crime. The defence maintained that the assassination +had been for honour's sake, and the unwritten law, +to which appeal is made in generation after generation, was +urged at every point. That Guido had suffered unspeakable +ignominy cannot be denied; that his wife had been untrue to +him even in the perilous flight with Caponsacchi is unproved, +as the courts had evidently held in the Process of Flight. +The prosecution, on the other hand, reiterated in every argument +their reading of Guido's motive—greed. Greed had led +him to marry Pompilia. Greed had occasioned his disgraceful +wranglings with the Comparini. Defeated greed had made +him torture his wife into scandalous flight, and calculating +greed had led him to commit the murder at a time and in a +manner to save the whole property to himself. Still further, +said the prosecution, not only was his motive bad, but the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xiii" id="Page_xiii">xiii</a></span> +crime was committed in a way which involved him in half +a dozen accessory crimes, each of them capital. Such is the +drift of the argument, which is fortified at every point by +citation of precedent from the legal procedure of all ages. +Altogether it is a highly skilled legal battle according to the +technical limitations of the game, while the simple appeals +to equity and to common human feeling hardly enter at all.</p> + +<p>The trial proceeded in two stages. The earlier one, during +the latter half of January, was opened by Arcangeli +(<a href="#pamphlet1">pamphlet 1</a>), supported by Advocate Spreti (<a href="#pamphlet2">pamphlet 2</a>). +The prosecution is opened by Procurator Gambi (<a href="#pamphlet5">pamphlet 5</a>), +supported by Advocate Bottini (<a href="#pamphlet6">pamphlet 6</a>). Arcangeli and +Bottini make further argument in <a href="#pamphlet3">pamphlets 3</a> and <a href="#pamphlet14">14</a>. Two +pamphlets of evidence were assembled and printed—for the +defence, <a href="#pamphlet7">pamphlet 7</a>; and for the prosecution, <a href="#pamphlet4">pamphlet 4</a>. +The latter part of this stage of the case is much occupied with +arguing whether Guido and his companions may be tortured +to get a fuller statement from them. In spite of the efforts +of Guido's attorneys, the torture was evidently decreed, and +fuller evidence was forced from the defendants, though one of +them bore the torture till he fainted twice. The trial then +enters on its second stage, in which, after some preliminary +skirmishing about the legality of the torture and the status +of the evidence given under this torture, the lawyers settle +to their most masterly work. Arcangeli and Spreti develop +an elaborate and skilled defence (<a href="#pamphlet8">pamphlets 8</a> and <a href="#pamphlet9">9</a>), and +are answered by Bottini's masterpiece for the prosecution +(<a href="#pamphlet13">pamphlet 13</a>). Spreti closes the defence in <a href="#pamphlet16">pamphlet 16</a>. +<a href="#pamphlet11">Pamphlet 11</a> presents some additional matters of evidence.</p> + +<p>All these arguments and summaries of evidence were printed +by the official papal press (see the imprint <i>Typis Rev. Cam. +Apost.</i>), probably overnight, between the sessions of the court, +as typewritten briefs would be prepared to-day. Few copies +were printed, and these were solely for the judges and attorneys +in the case. There would be no popular circulation of +them in Rome at large. The particular copies included in the +<i>Old Yellow Book</i> were probably gathered by one of these +attorneys, and sent to Signor Cencini in Florence (letter iii. +p. <a href="#Page_238">238</a>).</p> + +<p>We need but look to our own age to rest assured that outside +of the court room all Rome was athrill with interest in +this murder case, and was speculating on the fate of the +accused. The attorneys for the defence, in the midst of the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xiv" id="Page_xiv">xiv</a></span> +trial, made a sudden appeal to this public interest and sought +the support of public sentiment by means of an anonymous +pamphlet (<a href="#pamphlet10">pamphlet 10</a>) written in Italian and printed without +an imprint or signature, but evidently addressed to the +bar of public opinion. It seems to have been written by +Guido's lawyers, or their lackeys, for it repeats the various +points already made in the arguments. Whether it was distributed +free or was sold for a small price, it must have been +seized and devoured by all Rome as are the journalistic +reports of notorious criminal trials to-day. We can imagine +the alarm of the prosecution when they perceived this flank +movement against them. With all possible haste they prepared +their reply, also in Italian and without signature or +imprint, and probably within a day or two had issued this +response (<a href="#pamphlet15">pamphlet 15</a>), which meets the other pamphlet at +every point, and bitterly arraigns the greed of Guido. These +two pamphlets evidently suggested to Browning his "Half-Rome" +and "Other Half-Rome."</p> + +<p>There must have been other popular exploitations of this +crime. Two manuscript Italian narratives of it have been +discovered. The first of these (pp. <a href="#Page_259">259</a>-<a href="#Page_266">266</a>) was found in +London and sent to Browning, who used it extensively in +writing his poem. The second (pp. <a href="#Page_269">269</a>-<a href="#Page_281">281</a>) was discovered +a few years ago in Rome. Other accounts may yet come to +light.</p> + +<p>The trial of Guido and his companions was carried forward +to a prompt judgment, and on February 18 they were pronounced +guilty and were condemned to death. A technical +staying of sentence for four days was granted by reason of +Guido's <i>clerical privilege</i>, but execution followed on February +22. The <i>Old Yellow Book</i> includes three original letters +(pp. <a href="#Page_235">237</a>-<a href="#Page_238">8</a>) written from Rome immediately after the execution +to Signor Cencini at Florence.</p> + +<p>Yet the case was not quite at an end. A number of civil +suits were promptly instituted by various claimants for the +property of the Comparini. The Franceschini still pushed +their claim in spite of the infamy they had suffered for that +property. Pompilia's executor, Tighetti, claimed all in trust +for the child, Gaetano. Then the refuge of the Convertites, +under their legal right to the property of all women of evil life +who died in Rome, accused the memory of Pompilia and +claimed her property. The case seemed to be entering on +one of those interminable struggles in court. The Procurator +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xv" id="Page_xv">xv</a></span> +Lamparelli (<a href="#pamphlet17">pamphlet 17)</a> goes back to analyse again the +motives in the whole case and to justify Pompilia's innocence. +The remainder of this trial is lost to us save for the final <i>Definitive +Sentence</i> of the courts (<a href="#pamphlet18">pamphlet 18)</a>, issued in September +1698, which clears the memory of Pompilia entirely and for +ever in the eyes of the law.</p> + +<p>This was the record which fell into Browning's hands. The +poet tells of his immediate interest in the tragedy, partly due +to that common human interest in great crimes, partly to the +casuistic presentation of motive throughout the <i>Book</i>, partly +to his championing the rights of Pompilia, dishonoured and +slain not merely by a brutally selfish husband, but by a corrupt +social condition around her.</p> + +<p>After some delay, Browning saw his way to embody in art +the story which had interested him so deeply. The plan came +to him, according to W. M. Rossetti, one day while he was +walking at Biarritz, and from 1862 till the publication in +1868-9, he was working continuously on <i>The Ring and the Book</i>. +He had mastered every detail of the <i>Yellow Book</i> by continuous +re-readings, and in his art he was scrupulously, but never +laboriously, accurate to the facts before him. In the poem he +names thirty-three persons exactly as he found them in his +original. Place names are adopted with the same accuracy. +The specific dates recorded in the <i>Book</i> are followed at all +points, save in the significant change of the date of Caponsacchi's +rescue of Pompilia from April 29 to 23, St. George's +Day. The incidents of the tragedy, even when compromising to +Pompilia, whose cause he championed, are used without repression +or falsification. And perhaps most remarkable of all, +the poet had mastered all the technical paraphernalia and +phraseology of the lawyers, and uses these with minute care, +not entirely devoid of misunderstanding and error. In the +<i>Book</i> he found all the points of law, all the precedents and +authorities, and almost all of the Latin phrases and sentences +found in the monologues of the lawyers of the poem. A remarkable +instance of this is seen in his word for word adaptation +of the long peroration of Arcangeli (<a href="#pamphlet8">pamphlet 8)</a> in the +close of the monologue of the Arcangeli of the poem. And +the actual letter of Arcangeli (p. <a href="#Page_237">235</a>) is reproduced verbatim +in the poem, book xii. ll. 239-88. Altogether the poet affords +one of the most remarkable illustrations of literal and detailed +accuracy in the use of the raw material of art.</p> + +<p>Yet here, as in all cases of true art, the greatness of the final +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xvi" id="Page_xvi">xvi</a></span> +product lies not so much in the material that fell to the artist +as in the personal resource and power within himself which +was able to use the material. Browning found suggestion for +a suffering saint in Fra Celestino's report of Pompilia's death-bed +(pp. <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>), but the Pompilia of the poem embodies the +poet's deepest insight into womanhood with all its spiritual +relationships, in the love of man, the passion of maternity, +and devotion to God. Browning ascertained in the <i>Book</i> +that Caponsacchi was a resolute man, who had involved himself +in many perils for the sake of Pompilia, but from his own +personal resource of manly devotion, of chivalrous daring, of +passionate indignation at wrong, of spiritual tenderness and +reverence, he created a Caponsacchi. In the <i>Book</i> he found +every turn of the cunning, of the greed, of the brutality of +Guido and his family, but from his own deep realisation of the +power of evil in the world, and of the black depravity of +the lowest forms of humanity, he created his Franceschini. +Thus at every point, founding himself on the fact of the <i>Book</i>, +he is able to set forth this tragedy to the world as it grew in +his own imagination while searching his own heart and the +hearts of others through many years. And the chance-found +<i>Old Yellow Book</i> at last occasioned the most profound utterance +Robert Browning was to give to the world in all that +concerns the human heart and its motives as they play the +drama of the world before the eye of the Almighty.</p> + +<p class="left45"> +CHARLES W. HODELL. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xvii" id="Page_xvii">xvii</a></span></p> + +<p class="poem p6"> +"Do you see this square old yellow book +<span class="i6">... pure, crude fact.</span> +Give it me back! The thing's restorative<br /> +I' the touch and sight."</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xix" id="Page_xix">xix</a></span></p> +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p>A Setting-forth<br /> +of the entire Criminal Cause<br /> +against<br /> +GUIDO FRANCESCHINI, Nobleman<br /> +of Arezzo,<br /> +and his Bravoes,<br /> +who were put to death in Rome,<br /> +February 22, 1698.</p> + +<p><span class="s1">The first by beheading, the other four by the gallows.</span></p> + +<p>ROMAN MURDER-CASE.</p> + +<p class="s1">In which it is disputed whether and when a Husband<br /> +may kill his Adulterous Wife without<br /> +incurring the ordinary penalty.</p> +</div> + +<div id="toc" class="p6"> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">1</a></span></p> +<p class="b1 center">CONTENTS</p> +<p> <span class="page">PAGE</span></p> + +<p>Sentence of the Criminal Court of Florence in the criminal case<span class="page"><a href="#sentence">5</a></span> +against Gregorio Guillichini, Francesca Pompilia Comparini, +wife of Guido Franceschini, etc. December 1697</p> + +<p>Argument in defence of the said Franceschini of the Honourable +Signor Giacinto Arcangeli, Procurator of the Poor in Rome, +made before the congregation of Monsignor the Governor<span class="page"><a href="#ft1">9</a></span></p> + +<p>Argument of the Honourable Signor Advocate Desiderio Spreti, +Advocate of the Poor, in defence of said Franceschini and his +associates<span class="page"><a href="#ft2">25</a></span></p> + +<p>Argument of the abovesaid Signor Arcangeli in defence of Biagio +Agostinelli and his companions in crime <span class="page"><a href="#ft3">39</a></span></p> + +<p>Summary of fact made in behalf of the Fisc <span class="page"><a href="#ft4">47</a></span></p> + +<p>Argument of Signor Francesco Gambi, Procurator of the Fisc and of +the Reverend Apostolic Chamber, against the abovesaid Franceschini +and his companions in crime <span class="page"><a href="#ft5">63</a></span></p> + +<p>Argument of Signor Giovanni Battista Bottini, Advocate of the Fisc + and of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber, against the abovesaid <span class="page"><a href="#ft6">73</a></span></p> + +<p>Summary of fact in behalf of Franceschini and his associates in crime <span class="page"><a href="#ft7">87</a></span></p> + +<p>Another Argument of the abovesaid Signor Arcangeli in favour and + defence of the abovesaid <span class="page"><a href="#ft8">107</a></span></p> + +<p>Another Argument of Signor Advocate Spreti in favour of the above <span class="page"><a href="#ft9">131</a></span></p> + +<p>An Account of the facts and grounds, made and given by an Anonymous + Author <span class="page"><a href="#pamphlet10">145</a></span></p> + +<p>Another Summary made on behalf of the Fisc <span class="page"><a href="#ft11">157</a></span></p> + +<p>Argument of Signor Gambi, Procurator of the Fisc, against the abovesaid + Franceschini and his companions <span class="page"><a href="#ft12">163</a></span></p> + +<p>Another Argument of the Signor Giovanni Battista Bottini, Advocate + of the Fisc <span class="page"><a href="#ft13">169</a></span></p> + +<p>Another Argument of the abovesaid against the said Defendants <span class="page"><a href="#ft14">197</a></span></p> + +<p>A Response of the abovesaid account of fact as given by the Anonymous + Author <span class="page"><a href="#pamphlet15">209</a></span></p> + +<p>Argument of Signor Advocate Spreti in favour of Franceschini, etc. <span class="page"><a href="#ft16">227</a></span></p> + +<p>Letter written by the Honourable Signor Giacinto Arcangeli, Procurator + of the Poor, to Monsignore Francesco Cencini in Florence, + in which he tells him that the sentence of death had been + executed in Rome against the guilty on February 22, 1698—that + is, that Franceschini had been beheaded, and the other four + hanged <span class="page"><a href="#Page_235">235</a></span></p> + +<p>Two other Letters, one written by Signor Gaspero del Torto and the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">2</a></span> + other by Signor Carlo Antonio Ugolinucci to the aforesaid + Monsignore Francesco Cencini <span class="page"><a href="#Page_237">237</a></span></p> + +<p>Argument of Signor Antonio Lamparelli, Procurator of the Poor in + the said case <span class="page"><a href="#ft17">239</a></span></p> + +<p>The Sentence of Signor Marco Antonio Venturini, Judge in Criminal + causes, which declares that the said adultery was not proved, + and which restores to her original fame the memory of Francesca + Pompilia Comparini, wife of Guido Franceschini <span class="page"><a href="#Page_252">252</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">The Secondary Source of "The Ring and the Book"</span> <span class="page"><a href="#secondary_source">257</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Trial and Death of Franceschini and his Companions</span> <span class="page"><a href="#trial">267</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Notes and Comment</span> <span class="page"><a href="#Page_283">283</a></span></p> +</div> + +<div class="figcenter p6"> +<img src="images/sign.jpg" width="650" height="328" alt="Quotation" /> +<p class="caption">But for me the Muse in her strength prepares her +mightiest arrow.</p> +</div> + +<div class="figcenter p6"> +<img src="images/fax.jpg" width="420" height="650" alt="Facsimile Page" /> +<p class="caption">Facsimile Page from the Original +"Old Yellow Book."</p> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6"><a name="sentence" id="sentence"></a>SENTENCE OF THE CRIMINAL COURT +OF FLORENCE</p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">5</a></span></p> + +<p class="right p2"><i>February 15, 1697 A.D.</i></p> + +<p>Attestation by me undersigned how, in the order of the affairs +of the Governors, which are set before His Serene Highness, in +the Chancery of the Illustrious Signori Auditori of the Criminal +Court of Florence, there appears among other affairs of business, +under decision 3549, the following of tenor as written below, +that is Arezzo against</p> + +<p class="i4"> +1. Gregorio, son of Francesco Guillichini, not described.</p> + +<p class="i4">2. Francesca Pompilia Comparini, wife of Guido +Franceschini, and</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">3. Francesco,</span> son of Giovanni Borsi called Venerino, +servant of Agosto, Host at the "Canale," +</p> + +<p>because the second Accused, against her honour and conjugal +faith, had given herself up to dishonest amours with the Canon +Giuseppe Caponsacchi and with the first Accused, who instructed +her, as you may well believe, to part from the aforesaid +City of Arezzo, the evening of April 28, 1697. And, that +they might not be discovered and hindered, the second Accused +put a sleeping-potion and opium in her husband's wine at +dinner. At about one o'clock the same night, the said Canon +Caponsacchi and the first Accused conducted the aforesaid +second Accused away from the home of her husband. As the +gates of the city were closed, they climbed the wall on the hill +of the Torrione; and having reached the "Horse" Inn, outside +of the gate San Clemente, they were there awaited by the third +Accused with a two-horse carriage. When Canon Caponsacchi +and the second Accused had entered into the said carriage, the +word was given by him, the aforesaid first Accused, and they +set out then upon the way toward Perugia, the said third +Accused driving the carriage as far as Camoscia. And while +they were travelling along the road they kissed one another +before the very face of the third Accused.</p> + +<p>Still further, the second Accused, along with the first Accused +and Canon Caponsacchi, carried away furtively from the house +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">6</a></span> +of the said Guido, her husband, from a chest locked with a +key, which she took from her husband's trousers [the following +articles]: About 200 scudi in gold and silver coin; an oriental +pearl necklace worth about 200 scudi; a pair of diamond +pendants worth 84 scudi; a solitaire diamond ring worth 40 +scudi; two pearls with their pins, to be used as pendants, 6 +scudi; a gold ring with turquoise setting worth 2 scudi; a gold +ring set with ruby worth 36 scudi; an amber necklace worth 5 +scudi; a necklace of garnets alternated with little beads of fine +brass worth 6 scudi; a pair of earrings in the shape of a little +ship of gold with a pearl worth 16 scudi; two necklaces of +various common stones worth 4 scudi; a coronet of carnelians +with five settings and with a cameo in silver filigree worth 12 +scudi; a damask suit with its mantle, and a petticoat of a poppy +colour, embroidered with various flowers, worth 40 scudi; a +light-blue petticoat, flowered with white, worth 8 scudi; two +vests to place under the mantle worth 2 scudi; a pair of sleeves +of point lace worth 20 scudi; another pair of sleeves fringed +with lace worth 5 scudi; a collar worth 4 scudi; a scarf of black +taffeta for the shoulder with a bow of ribbon worth 8 scudi; an +embroidered silk cuff worth 14 scudi; two aprons of key-bit +pattern with their lace worth 12 scudi; a pair of scarlet silk +boots worth 14 scudi; a pair of woollen stockings, a pair of +white linen hose, and a pair of light-blue hose, worth 5 scudi; +a snuff-coloured worsted bodice with petticoat, ornamented +with white and red pawns, worth 3 scudi; a blue and white +coat of yarn and linen, adorned with scarlet and other coloured +ornaments, worth 10 scudi; a worsted petticoat of light-blue +and orange colour, striped lengthwise, with yellow lines and +with various colours at the feet, worth 14 scudi; an embroidered +petticoat worth 9 scudi; a silk cuff worth 5 scudi; four linen +smocks for women worth 14 scudi; a pair of shoes with silver +buckles worth 8 scudi; many tassels and tapes of various sorts +worth 14 scudi; six fine napkins worth 7 scudi; a collar of +crumpled silk worth 7 scudi; two pairs of gloves of a value of 4 +scudi; four handkerchiefs worth 5 scudi; a little silver snuff-box +with the arms of the Franceschini house upon it worth 16 scudi; +a coat of her husband Guido, rubbed and rent by the lock of a +chest where he kept part of the aforesaid clothing. And they +had converted the whole to their own uses against the will of +the same, the first Accused and Canon Caponsacchi having +scaled the walls of the city in company with the second Accused, +as soon as she had committed adultery with them. And the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">7</a></span> +said third Accused had given opportunity for flight to the said +second Accused along with the Canon, in the manner told.</p> + +<p>Therefore the Commissioner of Arezzo was of opinion to condemn +arbitrarily the first Accused to five years' confinement +at Portoferrio with the penalty of the galleys for the same +length of time, not counting the reservation of 15 days to +appear and clear himself; to condemn the second Accused to +the penalty of the Stinche for life and to the restitution of what +was taken away, with the abovesaid reservation; and that +the third Accused be not prosecuted further and be liberated +from prison. But the Criminal Court was of opinion that the +first Accused should be condemned to the galleys during the +pleasure of His Serene Highness, with the said reservation. +As to the second Accused, who was imprisoned here in Rome, +in a sacred place, it suspended the execution. And for the +third, who had done no voluntary evil, it gave up further +inquiry.</p> + +<p>Again proposed in the said business before His Serene and +Blessed Highness with the signature of December 24, 1697.</p> + +<p class="left25"> +The opinion of the Court stands approved.<br /> +<span class="i6">In sign of which,</span></p> + +<p class="left35">I, <span class="smcap">Joseph Vesinius</span>, J. V. D., an official<br /> +<span class="i4">in the Criminal Court of Florence,</span><br /> +<span class="i4">etc., in faith whereto, etc.</span></p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0">[<a name="ft1" id="ft1">File-title of Pamphlet 1.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor in<br /> +Criminal Cases</i>:</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>On Behalf of Count Guido Franceschini,<br /> +Prisoner, against the Fisc.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Memorial of fact and law.</i></p> + +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA HOMICIDIORUM<a name="pamphlet1" id="pamphlet1"></a></p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">11</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 1.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord Governor:</p> + +<p>Count Guido Franceschini, born of a noble race, had married, +under ill omen, Francesca Pompilia, whom Pietro and Violante +had asserted (even to one occupying a very high office) to be +their own daughter. After a little while, she was taken to +Arezzo, the country of her husband, along with her foster-parents, +and was restrained from leading her life with utter +freedom. Yet she has made pretence that she was hated on the +pretext of sterility, as is clearly shown in her deposition during +her prosecution for flight from her husband's home. Both she +and her parents took it ill that they were denied their old free +life, and they urged their daughter to make complaint before +the Most Reverend Bishop, saying that she had been offered +poison by her brother-in-law. At the departure of this couple, +when they were about to return to the City, they most basely +instigated her—yes, and even commanded her by her duty to +obey them—that she should kill her husband, poison her +brother-in-law and mother-in-law, and burn the house; and +then with the aid of a lover to be chosen thereafter, she should +put into effect her long-planned flight back to the City. (But +all this should be done after their departure, lest they might +seem to have given her evil counsel.) [Such facts] may be +clearly deduced from one of the letters presented as evidence +in the same prosecution.</p> + +<p>When these pseudo-parents had returned home, they declared +that Francesca was not born of themselves, but had been +conceived of an unknown father by a vile strumpet. They +then entered suit before Judge Tomati for the nullification of +the dowry contract.</p> + +<p>Day by day the love of Pompilia for her husband kept +decreasing, while her affection for a certain priest was on the +increase. This affair went so far that on an appointed night, +while her husband was oppressed with sleep (and I wish I could +say that she had no hand in this, and had not procured drugs +from outside), she began her flight from her husband's house +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">12</a></span> +toward Rome, nor was this flight without theft of money and +the company of her lover. Her most wretched husband +pursued them, and she was imprisoned not far from the City. +Then, when after a short time they were brought to trial, the +lover was banished to Civita Vecchia for adultery, and she +herself was placed in safe keeping. But owing to her pregnancy +she returned to the home of Pietro and Violante, where she +gave birth to a child (and I wish I could say that it had not +been conceived in adultery). This increased the shame and +indignation of the husband, and the wrath, which had long +been stirred, grew strong, because his honour among upright +men was lost and he was pointed out with the finger of scorn, +especially in his own country, where a good reputation is much +cherished by men who are well-born. Therefore his anger so +impelled the luckless man to fury, and his indignation so drove +him to desperation, that he preferred to die rather than to live +ignominiously among honourable men. With gloomy mind, he +rushed headlong to the City, accompanied by four companions. +On the second night of the current month of January, under +the show of giving a letter from the banished lover, he pretended +to approach the home of the Comparini. When at the name of +Caponsacchi the door was opened, he cut the throats of Violante +and Pietro, and stabbed Francesca with so many wounds that +she died after a few days.</p> + +<p>While this desperation continued, his dull and unforeseeing +mind suggested no way to find a place of safety. But accompanied +by the same men, he set out for his own country along +the public highway by the shortest route. Then, while he was +resting upon a pallet in a certain tavern, he was arrested, together +with his companions, by the pursuing officers.</p> + +<p>Great indeed is this crime, but very greatly to be pitied also, +and most worthy of excuse. Even the most severe laws give +indulgence and are very mild towards husbands who wipe out +the stain of their infamy with the blood of their adulterous wives. +[Citation of <i>Lex Julia de Adulteriis, Lex Cornelia de Sicariis</i> and +the Gracchian law. Cf. <i>Ring and Book</i>, I. 2268.]</p> + +<p>This indeed was sanctioned in the laws of the Athenians and +of Solon (that is, of the wisest of legislators), and what is more, +even in the rude age of Romulus, law 15, where we read:</p> + +<p>"A man and his relatives may kill as they wish a wife convicted +of adultery." [Citations; and likewise in the Laws of the +Twelve Tables, see Aulus Gellius, etc.]</p> + +<p>I hold, to begin with, that there can be no doubt of the adultery +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">13</a></span> +of the wife [for several reasons]. [First], her flight together +with her lover during a long-continued journey. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>[Second], the love letters sent by each party; these cannot be +read in the prosecution for flight without nausea. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>[Third], the clandestine entry of the lover into her home at a +suspicious time. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>[Fourth], the kisses given during the flight (p. 100) according +to the following sentiment: "Sight, conversation, touch, afterwards +kisses, and then the deed [adultery]." [Citations.]</p> + +<p>[Fifth], their sleeping in the same room at the inn. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>[Sixth], the sentence of the judge, who condemned the lover +for his criminal knowledge of her, which made this adultery +notorious. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Furthermore, we are not here arguing to prove adultery for +the purpose of demanding punishment [upon the adulteress], +but to excuse her slayer, and for his defence; in this case, even +lighter proofs would be abundant, as Matthæus advises. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>These matters being held as proved, the opinion of certain +authorities who assert that a husband is not excusable from the +ordinary penalty, who kills his adulterous wife after an interval, +does not stand in our way. For the aforesaid laws speak of the +wife who had been found in her guilt and has been killed incontinently. +Hence such indulgence ought not to be extended to +wife-murder committed after an interval, because the reins +should not be relaxed for men to sin and to declare the law for +themselves. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Furthermore, Farinacci does not affirm this conclusion, but +shows that he is very much in doubt, where he says: "The +matter is very doubtful with me, because injured honour and +just anger—both of which always oppress the heart—are very +strong grounds for the mitigation of the penalty." Matthæus +well weighs these words on our very point. And both Farinacci +and Rainaldi conclude that the penalty can be moderated at the +judgment of the Prince.</p> + +<p>I humbly pray that this be noted. The aforesaid laws, which +seem to require discovery in the very act of sin, as some have +thought, do not decide in that way merely for the purpose of +excusing a husband moved to slaughter by a sudden impulse of +wrath and by unadvised heat. But they so decide lest on any +suspicion of adultery whatsoever, oftentimes entirely without +foundation, men should rush upon and kill their wives, who are +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">14</a></span> +frequently innocent. Hence the "discovery in the very act of +crime," which is required by law, is not to be interpreted, nor to +be understood, as discovery in the very act of licence, but is to +be referred to the proof of the adultery, lest on trifling suspicion a +wife should be given over to death. But when the adultery is +not at all doubtful, there is no distinction between one killing +immediately and killing after an interval, so far as the matter +of escaping extreme punishment is concerned. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>For whenever a wife is convicted of adultery, or is a manifest +adulteress, she is always said to be "taken in crime." +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>And in very truth the reasons adduced by those holding the +contrary opinion are entirely too weak. For murder committed +for honour's sake is always said to be done immediately, whensoever +it may be committed. Because injury to the honour +always remains fixed before one's eyes, and by goading one with +busy and incessant stings it urges and impels him to its reparation. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Such relaxation of the reins to husbands, for taking into their +own hands the law, would indeed be too great if the law of +divorce were still valid. For in that case husbands would not be +permitted to make such reparation of their honour. For another +way would be satisfactorily provided for them, namely, in their +right to dismiss and repudiate the polluted wife. In this way +they could put far from themselves the cause of their disgrace, +yes, and the very ignominy itself. But when by the divine +favour our Gentile blindness was removed, and matrimony was +acknowledged to be perpetual and indissoluble, those were indeed +most worthy of pity who, when all other way of recovering +their honour was closed to them, washed away their stains in +the blood of their adulterous wives. Petrus Erodus [Citation], +after he has discussed a matter of this kind according to the usual +practice of Roman Law, adds in the end: "For as all hope of a +second marriage is gone so long as the adulteress still lives, we +judge that such very just anger is allayed with more difficulty, +unless it be by the flight of time;" and therefore such a case, +when not terminated by divorce, is usually terminated by +murder. For as Augustine says, "what is not permitted, +becomes as if it were permitted; that is, let the adulteress be +killed, that the husband may be released."</p> + +<p>I acknowledge that it is laudable to restrain the audacity of +husbands, lest they declare the law for themselves in their own +cause; since they may be mistaken. But it would be more +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">15</a></span> +laudable indeed to restrain the lust of wives; for if they would +act modestly and would live honourably they would not force +their husbands to this kind of crime, which I may almost call +necessary. Nor can we deny that by the ignominy brought upon +them by the adultery they are exasperated and are driven insane, +and a most just sense of anger is excited in their hearts. For +this grievance surpasses all others beyond comparison, and hence +is worthy of the greater pity, according to the words of the +satirist [<i>Juv.</i> <span class="smcap">X.</span> 314]: "This wrath exacts more than any law +concedes to wrath."</p> + +<p>Papinianus also well acknowledges this [Citation], where we +read: "Since it is very difficult to restrain just anger." For +these reasons, authorities hold that a just grievance should +render the penalty more lenient even in premediated crimes; +because the sense of "just grievance does not easily quiet down, +or lose its strength with the flight of time, but the heart is continually +pierced by infamy, and the longer the insult endures, +the longer endures the infamy, yea, and it is increased." +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>And this drives one on the more intensely, because with greater +impunity, as I may say, wives pollute their own matrimony and +destroy the honour of their entire household. In ancient times, +while the <i>Lex Julia</i> was in force, wives who polluted their +marriage-bed underwent the death penalty. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Likewise it was so ordained in the Holy Scriptures; for +adulterous wives were stoned to death, Gen. 38; Lev. 20, 10; +Deut. 23, 22; Ez. 16.</p> + +<p>The solace drawn from the public vengeance quieted the anger +and destroyed the infamy. Then the husband, who was restored +to his original freedom, could take a new and honest wife and +raise his sons in honour. But now, in our evil days, there is a +deplorable frequency of crime everywhere, as the rigour of the +Sacred Law has become obsolete. And since wives who live +basely are dealt with very mildly, the husband's condition +would indeed be most unfortunate if either he must live perpetually +in infamy, or must expiate her destruction, when she is +slain, by the death penalty, as Matthæus well considers. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>Therefore, when it is claimed that the husband shall escape +entirely unpunished, it is necessary that the wife be killed in the +very act of discovered sin. But when the question is as to +whether or not a husband may be punished more mildly than +usual when driven to wife-murder for honour's sake, it makes no +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">16</a></span> +difference whether he kill her immediately or after an interval. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>Nor does this opinion lack foundation in the very Civil Law +of the Romans, for Martian [Citation] asserts that a father who +had killed his son while out hunting, because he had polluted his +stepmother with adultery, was exiled. Nor had the father +found him in the very act of crime, but slew him while out hunting, +that is with a pretence of friendliness and by dissimulating +his injury. Accordingly he was punished, but not with the usual +penalty; for he had killed his son, not in his right as a father, +but in the manner of a robber. Hence we can infer that not +the killing, but the method of killing was punishable, as we may +deduce from Bartolo. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Still further, it is well worthy of consideration that one may +kill an adversary with impunity, for the sake of his personal +safety, but he must do so immediately and in the very act of +aggression, and not after an interval. For the life of one slain +may not be recovered by the slaying of the murderer. Accordingly, +whatever violence may follow upon the first murder +becomes vengeance, which is hateful and odious to the law; for +the jurisdiction of the judge is insulted by depriving him of the +power of publicly avenging murder. But if by the death of the +slayer the one slain could be called back to life, I think there is +no doubt that any one could kill the said slayer; for then such +an act would not be revenge, but due defence, leading toward the +recovery of the life that had been lost. But even when we are +dealing with an offence and injury which does not affect the +person of the one injured, it is likewise permitted that one who +has been robbed may, even after an interval, kill the thief for +the recovery of the stolen goods, provided every other way to +recover them is precluded. Likewise, one offended in his reputation +should be permitted at all times to kill the one injuring him; +for such an act may be termed, not the avenging of an injury, but +the re-establishing of wounded honour, which could be healed in +no other way. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Furthermore, as I have said, when one is discussing the +subject of self-defence, he is dealing with an instantaneous act; +hence the anger conceived therefrom ought to quiet down after +a while, according to the warning of St. Paul, Eph. 4: "Let +not the sun go down upon your wrath." But when we are +dealing with an offence that injures the honour, this is not +merely a momentary matter, but is protracted, and indeed +with the lapse of time becomes the greater, as the injured one +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">17</a></span> +is vilified the more. Therefore, whensoever the murder follows +it is always said to have been committed immediately. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>Relying upon these and other reasons, most authorities affirm +that a husband killing his adulterous wife after an interval, but +not found in licentiousness, is to be punished indeed, but more +mildly and with a penalty out of the ordinary. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Caball testifies that this has been the practice in many of +the world's tribunals. Calvinus gives other cases so decided. +[Citation.] And Cyriacus, who speaks in worse circumstances, +adduces numerous other cases, and the authorities recently +cited offer many more.</p> + +<p>This lenient opinion is the more readily to be accepted because, +as I claim, the deed about which we are arguing does not also +carry with it (as the Fisc holds) attendant circumstances +demanding such a rigorous penalty.</p> + +<p>[First] the taking of helpers to be present at the murders [is +not such a circumstance]; because he could lawfully use the +help of companions to provide more safely for his own honour +by the death of his wife. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>[Secondly] the crime is not raised to a higher class because he +led with him helpers at a price agreed upon; for what is more, +and is far more to be wondered at, a husband can lawfully +demand of others the murder of an adulterous wife, even by +means of money, as the following indisputably affirm. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Likewise it does not at all disturb [our line of argument] that +Count Guido might have killed his wife and the adulterer when +they were caught in the very act of flight at the tavern of +Castelnuovo, but that he preferred rather to have them imprisoned, +seeking their punishment by law, and not with his +own hand. We deny that he could have safely killed both of +them, inasmuch as he was alone, nor could he attack them, +except at the risk of his own life. Because the lover was of +powerful strength, not at all timid, and all too prompt for +resisting, since, in the word of one of the witnesses in the prosecution +for flight, he was called <i>Scapezzacollo</i> [cut-throat]. Nor +is it credible that, unless he had been fearless and full of spirit, +he would have ventured upon so great a crime, and would have +dared to participate in her flight, and to accompany the fugitive +wife from the home of her husband. And this fact is more +clearly deducible from one of his letters, in which, after urging +Francesca to mingle an opiate in the wine-flasks for the purpose +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">18</a></span> +of putting her husband and the servants to sleep, he adds that +if they find it out she should open the door; for he would either +suffer death with her or would snatch her from their hands. +These things indicate both courage and audacity. And though +the wife is a woman, that is a timid and unwarlike creature, +nevertheless Francesca was all too impudent and audacious, +whether because of her hatred for her husband or on account +of her anger at the imprisonment of her lover. For she drew a +sword upon her husband in the very presence of the officers +who were about to arrest her. And to prevent her from going +further, one of the bystanders had to snatch it from her hands. +Therefore, before their imprisonment, Guido could not put into +effect what he had had in mind and what he could lawfully do, +because he was alone and his strength was not sufficient. Then +when she had been taken to prison, and afterwards was placed +in safe keeping, it was impossible for him to vindicate his honour. +But when at last she had left the monastery and had gone back +to the home of Pietro and Violante, he took vengeance as soon +as he could. Therefore we hold that he killed her in the very +act, as it were, and immediately. In Sanfelicius [Citation], we +read of a case where a husband, though he could have killed +his wife immediately, did not do so, but craftily redeemed +himself from his disgrace by slaying his wife as soon as possible. +And Giurba also speaks of a case where the argument is concerning +an injury that was not personal, but real, as was said above.</p> + +<p>Guido saw to her capture, and insisted that she be punished, +lest she continue her adultery and viciousness, being powerless +to do anything else, because his confusion of mind, his helpless +fury, and his sense of shame led him unwisely into not taking +the law into his own hands and recovering his lost honour. He +indeed lodged complaint, but it was because he could not kill +her. Nor would his ignominy have been wiped out nor his +infamy have been destroyed by her imprisonment and punishment. +But when, indeed, after her imprisonment he was still +more shut out from noble company, his injury ever became the +more acute, and it stimulated him the more strongly to regain +his own reputation. But his bitterness of mind was increased +especially at hearing that she had gone back to the home of +Pietro and Violante, who had declared that she was not their +daughter, but the child of a dishonest woman; hence his injury +was increased by her staying in a home which he suspected, as +is said a little further on. Accordingly the same cause kept +urging him after her departure from the monastery, as had done +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">19</a></span> +so before her imprisonment and the appeals made by Count +Guido.</p> + +<p>It makes very little difference that Francesca was staying in +the home of Violante, which had been assigned to her as a safe +prison with the consent of Guido's brother. For what would +it amount to even if with the consent of Guido himself she had +been taken from the monastery (yet we have no word of this +matter in the trial). For Guido could make that pretence to +gain the opportunity of killing her for the restoration of his +honour. Nor would such dissimulation increase the crime, +especially to the degree of the ordinary penalty, since it is +certain that the husband may kill a wife stained with adultery +without incurring such penalty. Yet a heavier or lighter +penalty is inflicted, just as more or less treachery accompanies +the murder, as Matthæus testifies it was practised in the Senate +of Matrinumsis. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Nor is the attendant circumstance of the place assigned as a +prison worthy of consideration, as if the custody of the Prince +had been insulted; for one is not said to be in custody when +he is merely detained in a place under security that he will not +leave it. [Citation.] Furthermore, this objection falls utterly +to the ground, because the circumstance of such a place does +not increase the crime, whenever it is committed by one having +provocation or for the repelling of an injury. And [the following +authorities] hold thus in the more serious case of a crime +committed in prison. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Furthermore we do not believe, from what is said above, that +the penalty can be increased because of the murder of Pietro +and Violante, since the same injured honour, which impelled +Count Guido to kill his wife, forced him to kill the said parents. +And now may the ashes of the dead spare me if what I have +urged above, and what I am about to say, may seem to disturb +their peace! Neither the flame of hatred nor the impulse of +anger (which are far from me) have suggested these charges; +but the demands of the defence, which I have assumed without +a penny of compensation, compel me to employ every means +leading to the desired end.</p> + +<p>I have said, and I think not without due reason, that the +Accused sprang forward to the death of both of them, moved +simply by an immediate injury to his own reputation. For a +few months after the marriage contracted with Francesca, +whom they had professed to be their daughter, they had not +blushed to declare that she was not such. Hence there is an +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">20</a></span> +inevitable dilemma. Either [<i>first</i>] she was in deed and truth +their daughter, and then we must acknowledge that in afterward +denying her parentage they had inflicted the greatest +injury upon the honour and reputation of the Accused; for they +had conceived strong hatred and malice against him. Hence +they did not hesitate to disgrace their own daughter, in order +that they might bring upon him the infamy of having married +the daughter of a vile and dishonest woman. This is indeed +a fact, that whoever knows Count Guido supposes he has +married a girl, not merely of rank unequal to his own, but even +of the basest condition, and this greatly injures the reputation +of his entire household.</p> + +<p>Or else [<i>second</i>] Francesca was indeed conceived of an unknown +father and born of a dishonest harlot. And it cannot be denied, +that in that case he suffered even greater injury, which branded +him with a mark of infamy; both because of her birth and +from the fact that daughters are usually not unlike their mothers. +Cephalus [Citations], where we read: "From such mingling +with harlots it is to be supposed that the people become +degenerate, ignoble, and burning with lust." And would that +experience had not taught us this fact!</p> + +<p>The unfortunate man believed he was marrying the daughter +of Pietro and Violante, born legitimately, and yet by the contrivance +and trickery of this couple he married a girl of basest +stock, conceived illegitimately by a dishonourable mother. +From this fact alone the quality of those parents can be inferred, +who, for the sake of deceiving those lawfully entitled to the +trust-moneys, had made most vile pretence of the birth of a +child, entirely unmindful that they laid themselves liable to +capital punishment. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>It will not, therefore, be difficult to believe what Francesca +reveals in her letter to her brother-in-law, that the abovesaid +couple, in spite of the fact that she was well treated, kept +instigating her daily to poison her husband, her brother-in-law, +and her mother-in-law, and to burn the home. And though these +crimes are very base, they gave her still worse counsel, even by +her obligation to obey them; namely, that after their departure +from Arezzo, she should allure a lover, and leaving her husband's +home in his company, should return to the City. In her obedience +to their commands, this daughter seemed indeed all too +prompt. Who then will deny that such reckless daring, wherefrom +a notorious disgrace was inflicted upon the entire household +of the Accused, ought to be attributed to the base persuasion of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">21</a></span> +the said couple? Nor was it difficult to persuade that girl to do +what she was prone to by inborn instinct and by the example of +her mother.</p> + +<p>It is not my duty to divine why that couple so anxiously +desired the return of Francesca to their home. But I cannot +persuade myself that they were moved by mere charity, namely, +that she might escape ill-treatment. For Francesca, in the said +letter, acknowledges that she is leading a quiet life, and that her +husband and the servants are treating her very well, and that +what she had laid before the Bishop had been the falsehood of +the said couple.</p> + +<p>I know furthermore that if a husband have knowledge of the +adultery of his wife and keep her in his home, he cannot escape +the mark and penalty of a pimp. [Citations.] If, therefore, as +the said couple declare, Francesca was not their daughter, why +did they receive her so tenderly into their home after her +adultery was plainly manifest? Why did they, as I may say, +cherish her in their breasts, not merely up till the birth of her +child, but even till death? And I wish I could say that her love +affairs with the banished [priest] were not continued there! +For at his mere name, after the knocking at the door, as soon as +they heard that some one was about to give them a letter from +the one in banishment, immediately the door was opened and +Guido was given an entry for recovering his honour. If, indeed, +the said couple had been displeased with the adultery of Francesca, +they would, without doubt, have shuddered at the name +of the adulterer, and would have cut off every way for mutual +correspondence. Therefore it is most clearly evident that the +cause of wounded honour in the Accused had continued, and +indeed new causes of the same kind had arisen, all of which +tended toward blackening his reputation.</p> + +<p>Nor does it make any difference that the Accused may have +had in mind several causes of hatred toward both Francesca and +the Comparini. For if these are well weighed, they all coincide +with, and are reduced to, the original cause, namely, that of +wounded honour. However that may be, when causes are compatible +with one another, the act that follows should always be +attributed to the stronger and more urgent and more acute. +[Citations.] And on the point that when several causes concur, +murder is to be referred and attributed to injured honour, and +not to the others: [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Therefore I think that any wise man ought to acknowledge +that Guido had most just cause for killing the said couple, and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">22</a></span> +that very just anger had been excited against them. This was +increased day by day by the perfectly human consideration that +he would not have married her unless he had been deceived by +that very tricky couple. And to what is said above we may add +that either the child born [of Pompilia] was conceived in +adultery, as the Accused could well believe, since he was ignorant +of the fact that his wife was pregnant during her flight; and +then we cannot deny that new offence was given to his honour, +or the old one was renewed, by the said birth; or the child was +born of his legitimate father; and who will deny that by the +hiding of the child, Guido ought to be angered anew over the +loss of his son? And the great indignation conceived from either +cause (the force of which is very powerful) is so deserving of +excuse that very many atrocious crimes committed upon the +impulse of just anger have gone entirely unpunished. [Citations.] +The following text [Citation] agrees with this, "Nevertheless, +because night and just anger ameliorate his deed, he can be sent +into exile." [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And not infrequently, in the contingency of such a deed, men +have escaped entirely unpunished, who, when moved by just +anger, have laid hands even upon the innocent. For a certain +Smyrnean woman had killed her husband and her son conceived +of him, because her husband had slain her own son by her first +marriage. When she was accused before Dolabella, as Proconsul, +he was unwilling either to liberate one who was stained with two +murders, or to condemn her, as she had been moved by just +anger. He therefore sent her to the Areopagus, that assembly of +very wise judges. There, when the cause had been made known, +response was given that she and her accuser should come back +after a hundred years. And so the defendant in a double +murder, although she had also killed one who was innocent, +escaped entirely unpunished. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Likewise, a wife who had given command for the murder of her +husband because of just anger from his denial of her matrimonial +dues was punished with a fine, and a temporary residence in a +monastery, as Cyriacus testifies. [Citation.] Such pleas might +indeed hold good whenever the accused had confessed the crime, +or had been lawfully convicted, neither of which can be affirmed +[in our case]. But much more are they to be admitted, since he +confesses only that he gave order for striking his wife's face, or +for mutilating it; and if those he commanded exceeded his order, +he should not be held responsible for their excess. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>His fellows and companions give his name, and claim that he +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">23</a></span> +had a hand in the murders. And in spite of the fact that the +Fisc claims they have hidden the truth in many respects, equity +will not allow that certain matters be separated from their +depositions and that these be accepted only in part; for if they +are false in one matter, such are they to be considered in all. It +would be more than enough to take away from those depositions +all credence that, under torture in his presence, they did not +purge that stain. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>It has very justly been permitted that in defence of this noble +man, I should deduce these matters, as they say, with galloping +pen. The scantiness of the time has not suffered me to bring +together other grounds for my case; these could be gathered +with little labour, and possibly not without utility. Yet I believe +that all objections, which can be raised on the part of the Fisc, +have been abundantly satisfied.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Giacinto Arcangeli</span>, <i>Procurator of the Poor</i>.</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0">[<a name="ft2" id="ft2">File-title of Pamphlet 2.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor in<br /> +Criminal Cases</i>:</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>On Behalf of Count Guido Franceschini<br /> +and his Associates, Prisoners,<br /> +against the Court and the Fisc.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Memorial of law by the Honourable<br /> +Advocate of the Poor.</i></p> + +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center p6 b1">ROMANA HOMICIDIORUM<a name="pamphlet2" id="pamphlet2"></a></p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">27</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 2.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord Governor:</p> + +<p>From the "prosecution [for flight]," which was brought in this +very tribunal, and by his honour, Lord Venturini, Judge in this +present case, there is more than satisfactory proof of adultery +committed by Francesca Pompilia, wife of Count Guido Franceschini, +a nobleman of Arezzo, with the Canon Caponsacchi. With +Caponsacchi the parents of this same Francesca Pompilia +entered into conspiracy, although they were living here in the +City. And after she had given an opiate to Count Guido and +his entire household, she fled that same night from the City of +Arezzo toward Rome.</p> + +<p>Consequently, the Canon, as may be remembered, was +banished to Civita Vecchia, with a statement of his criminal +knowledge of that woman in the said decree of condemnation. +This adultery is also evident from other matters of evidence +deduced by the Procurator of the Poor. There remains, accordingly, +no room to doubt it, but rather their adultery may be said +to be notorious here in the City, in the country of Count Guido, +and throughout all Etruria.</p> + +<p>Since this is established, we can safely assert that even if +Guido had confessed that he slew his wife with the complicity +and help of Blasio Agostinelli of the town of Popolo, Domenico +Gambassini of Florence, Francesco Pasquini of the castle of Monte +Acuto, and Alessandro Baldeschi of Tiferno, he should not +therefore be punished with the ordinary death penalty, but more +mildly. This is in accord with the decision of Emperor Pius as +related by Ulpian [Citation] and by Martian. [Citation.] For +in both of them it is said that a man of low birth is sent into perpetual +exile, but that a noble is banished only for a limited time, +but the crime of a husband who is moved by just anger is overlooked, +as this same Ulpian confirms [Citation], since it is most +difficult to restrain such anger. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Yet we should not consider it necessary that the adultery of +the wife be conclusively proved (as it really is) in order that +there be room for mitigating the said penalty. For it would be +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">28</a></span> +enough, if we were dealing with a case of mere suspicion: Glossa, +etc. "A man who had killed his son because he believed the +young man had lain with his stepmother, as was true, was +deported to an island." [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Dondeus also speaks of a man who had boasted that he wished +to ruin the sister of the one who killed him, which is said to have +aroused just suspicion and fear for the loss of honour sufficient to +free the slayer from the ordinary penalty of murder. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor is it true, as some authorities affirm, that the husband +must take the wife in very adultery, and kill her immediately; +in which case, they say the abovesaid laws hold good, but that +it is otherwise if the murder is done after an interval. +[Citations.] For the contrary opinion is the truer, the more +usual, and the one to be observed in practice, as Marsilius well +advises, where he speaks in defence of a certain nobleman who +had killed another person after an interval. The man slain +had betrothed his sister by promise and had kept her for three +months, and had then rejected her. Because of this, a great +injury and much infamy were inflicted upon his family and the +entire kin. Marsilius then adduces the abovesaid laws, which +pronounce concerning a husband who kills his adulterous wife; +and Bertazzolus offers the case of one who had killed his +adulterous wife and had afterward, in his own defence, proved +the adultery by the double confession of the same wife. +Claudius Jr. testifies that the murderer was banished for a time +by the praetor of Mirandola, and after the lapse of several +months he was recalled by the Duke of Mirandola. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Afflitto cites the decree of the Kingdom, beginning <i>Si Maritus</i>, +which concedes impunity to a husband who kills his wife and +the adulterer both, in the very act of adultery, and without any +delay. He then says that if both of these requisites are not +present, the husband is excused in part, but not entirely; and +so is punished more mildly. And in No. 2 he gives the reason; +because whenever one commits a crime, under impulse of just +anger, the penalty should be somewhat moderated, according +to the aforesaid text. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Matthæus [Citation] adduces the excellent words of Theodoric +as quoted by Cassiodorus [Citation], where we read: "For who +can bear to drag into court a man who has attempted to violate +his matrimonial rights? It is deep-seated even in beasts that +they should defend their mating even with deadly conflict, since +what is condemned by natural law is hateful to all living +creatures. We see bulls defending their cows by strife of horns, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">29</a></span> +rams fighting with their heads for their wethers, horses vindicating +by kicks and bites their females; so even these, who are +moved by no sense of shame, lay down their lives for their +mates. How then may a man endure to leave adultery unavenged, +which is known to have been committed to his eternal +disgrace? And so if you have made very little false statements +in the petition you offer, and if you have indeed only washed +away the stain to your marriage-bed by the blood of the +adulterer, taken in the act, and if you are looking back from +your exile, which was evidently inflicted not by reason of a +bloodthirsty mind, but because of your sense of shame, we bid +you return from your exile; since for a husband to use the +sword for the love of his sense of honour is not to overthrow +the laws, but to establish them."</p> + +<p>Dondeus says this interpretation is clearly proved by the +authority of a glossa in the chapter: <i>Ex litterarum</i>. [Citation.] +For in the text, when these words are used: "your wife taken +in adultery," a glossa explains the word "taken" as equal to +"convicted." Marta says this opinion is much more just and +equitable, and is commonly held. And Muta (<i>dec. Siciliæ 61</i>) +in the end offers a decision of the supreme court of the kingdom, +by which a husband was condemned to the galleys for seven +years. This was on account of the accompanying circumstances; +for he had had his wife summoned outside of the city +walls by his son, and there had killed her; and afterward her +body was found to have been devoured by dogs. Dexartus +testifies that it was thus decided in Sacred Royal Court, in +condemning a husband only to exile. Sanfelix also tells us +that certain noble young men, who had killed their wives, after +an interval, because of strong suspicion of adultery, were absolved +by the Royal Council of Naples, in view of the quality of the +persons concerned. In their favour, authorities of the highest +rank had written, whose allegations this same author places +under the said decision. And although some of these young +men were condemned to the oars, he said that this punishment +had been imposed because of the mutilation of the privates +which followed; because those who do such things are considered +enemies to nature. (<i>Panimoll. dec. 86.</i>) And Caldero, +although in the preceding numbers he inclined toward an +opinion contrary to ours, came over to our side when he saw +that Matthæus held that opinion.</p> + +<p>And the reason is very evident, for whenever such an injury +is suffered by fine natures, especially among the noble class, it +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">30</a></span> +is ever present with them, and continually oppresses the heart, +and urges it on to vengeance for the recovery of lost honour, as +Giurba well notes. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>For this reason, it has always and everywhere been held in +case of murder committed for honour's sake that there is no +place for the ordinary death penalty, which should be mitigated +at the discretion of the judge. And this rule has been followed, +when the murder was committed after an interval, and even +after a long interval. For the abovesaid reason, both Grammaticus +and Gizzarellus affirm and hand down this opinion. +The latter says that it has always been so adjudged by the +Sacred Council of Naples, and that this opinion has always been +accepted by our ancestors. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>It was so judged by the high court of the Vicar, although it +was dealing with a murder committed after two years, and by +craft, by two brothers upon the adulteress in the presence of her +sister's cousin. Cyriacus also speaks of the murder of a husband +by his wife, because he was keeping a mistress and was contriving +against her honour; and there he said that since just anger has +a long continuance, because of its extreme bitterness, vengeance +should always be said to follow immediately. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Another reason also is at hand, which is considered by the +authorities, namely, that an injury, whereby the honour is hurt, +is not personal, but real, and therefore can be resented at any +time whatsoever, even after the lapse of a very long time, as +Giurba holds in our circumstances. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>We have therefore a great many standard authorities who +affirm, for most vital reasons, that murder committed, even after +an interval, upon the person of the wife or of any one else, for +honour's sake, ought not to be punished with the ordinary death +penalty, but more mildly. Furthermore, these authorities bear +witness that the matter has been so judged in the tribunals with +which they are acquainted. No attention therefore should be +paid to the opposite opinion held by Farinacci [Citation]; for +we plainly see that he speaks contrary to the common and +usually accepted opinion in tribunals. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Still further it should be noted that the same author in <i>cons. +66, num. 5</i>, holds the very opposite, basing his opinion especially +upon a text in the law of Emperor Hadrian [Citation], where a +father had killed his son, who was not found in the act with his +stepmother, but while out hunting and in the woods, that is, +after an interval. And he was punished not with the death +penalty, but by deportation. Several of the above-cited +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">31</a></span> +authorities offer the decision of this text likewise in corroboration +of this opinion of ours. Our point is also proved by the +fact that this same author in <i>quaest. 121</i> is rather doubtful; +and there he acknowledges that for this opinion of ours the +reason given above is very strong, namely, that "injured +honour" and "just anger" always oppress the heart. And +so he says in such a case one should note the sense of the text +in the law <i>Non puto</i> [Citation], where Modestinus, Doctor of +Law, says that he thinks that one would not make a mistake +who in doubtful cases should readily give this response against +the Fisc; and Farinacci cites him so speaking.</p> + +<p>But one should be on his guard against what this same +Farinacci asserts: namely, that this opinion of his, so far as +he could see, was the one more approved by the Sacred Court. +For since this point of doubt, as he himself confesses, had not +then been advanced, he could not judge what would be the +outcome if it had been proposed. And indeed the wisest of the +said high authorities do not give their assent to his opinion, +but rather hold the contrary, which is favourable to ourselves, +as is seen in the decisions they have given from time to time. +For it was so held on March 25, 1672, in the case of Carolo +Falerno, who was condemned to an unusual penalty for the +murder of Francesco Domenici; for he had found him coming +out of a church, to which he had warned him not to go, as he +was suspicious that the one slain was following his wife. In +like manner with Carolo Matarazzi, August 15, 1673, who +killed his wife on the foolish grounds that he suspected her of +illegitimate conception because of the absence of her menses; +but this suspicion did not indeed correspond with the truth. +And in law a matter may be even more mistaken and less +observed by human intellect. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Likewise in a murder committed treacherously with an +arquebus upon the person of Tomaso Bovini by Francesco +Mattucio of Monte San Giovanni, a person of the very lowest +class, merely because of the attempted dishonour of his sister. +The attempt of the one killed was proved by two witnesses on +hearsay of the one slain. On September 4, 1692, the penalty +of life sentence to the galleys, to which the said Mattucio had +been convicted on strongest proofs on the preceding July 12, +was moderated by the sacred court, before the Right Reverend +Father Ratta, of blessed memory. With good right, therefore, +this same Farinacci is expressly confuted and overthrown by +Matthæus. [Citations.] +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">32</a></span></p> + +<p>This opinion of ours is to be accepted the more readily when +we consider that the husband is more stirred by the adultery of +his wife than by the murder of his son. [Citations.] Yes, and +even more than by the defilement of his daughter. [Citation.] +So that if a husband does not complain of the adultery of his +wife, he is considered a pimp, as Paschal holds, where we read +recently: "Adultery of the wife gives offence not merely to the +husband, but blackens and stains the entire kin." [Citations.] +That this happened in the present case is plainly evident; for +Abate Paolo, brother of Guido, was compelled not only to leave +the City, in which he had lived for many years with highest +praise, but even to pass out of Italy, because he was pursued +undoubtedly by the greatest disgrace on account of this adultery. +While he was carrying on Guido's cause in the courts, he moved +the laughter and sneers of almost all sensible and wise men, not +to say of the very judges themselves, as usually happens in +these circumstances. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor would it stand in the way of what we have said above, if +without prejudice to the truth, we should admit (as the Fisc +claims) that Count Guido killed his wife with the complicity and +aid of the said Blasio, Domenico, Francesco, and Alessandro, +assembled for that purpose; for he could do that in order to +take vengeance upon her more easily and more safely. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>[Nor would it stand in our way if we admitted] that he had +assembled the said men by means of money. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor does this plea of injured honour cease with regard to the +murders of the said father-in-law and mother-in-law; for since +their conspiracy in the adultery of their daughter is established, +they themselves were among the causes of the injury and +ignominy which resulted therefrom to the prejudice of the +honour and reputation of Count Guido, their son-in-law, and her +husband respectively. Therefore, these murders likewise ought +to be punished with the same penalty as the principal, according +to texts in the law <i>Qui domum</i>. [Citations.] And so they +gave cause enough to Count Guido to take vengeance on them.</p> + +<p>It is to be added, furthermore (as will be proved indeed, and +as Count Guido himself has asserted in his testimony), that they +themselves did another injury to his reputation by means of the +civil suit which they brought on the grounds of the pretended +birth of Francesca Pompilia; and not merely here in the City, +but also in his own country, they distributed the most bitter +libels, which were added to this same lawsuit. Hence it cannot +be denied that Count Guido for this reason had conceived a +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">33</a></span> +just anger and provocation, and that he had just cause for taking +vengeance. This is according to the text [Citation], where +Alexander the Third wrote to the Bishop of Tournay that a +certain woman who had killed her child should be placed in a +monastery, because she was reproached by her husband with +the accusation that it had been conceived in adultery. For in +crimes where anger does not entirely excuse, still the delinquent +who kills in anger conceived from just grievance is somewhat +excused. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>And this is true in spite of the fact that the Fisc may claim +that the penalty given in the Constitution of Alexander has been +incurred. For in the present case the crime cannot be said to +have been committed on account of hatred aroused by the lawsuit; +for in that suit Count Guido had gained a favourable +sentence from Judge Tomati, which was sanctioned by the +Supreme Tribunal of Justice. But the crime was committed +indeed because of his just indignation. And this arose, first, +from the ignominy growing out of the said pretence as to her +birth; second, from the provocation given by the Comparini +(now slain) in issuing and distributing the said papers; and, third, +from their conspiracy in the flight of his wife. For indeed this +Constitution of Alexander does not apply where no guile is +present and where some provocation has been given by the one +hurt. Farinacci very fully affirms this throughout <i>cons. 67</i>, +where in the end he places the complete decision of the Sacred +Court.</p> + +<p>In any case, since with Count Guido two causes for committing +crime concurred: one the aforesaid matter of the lawsuit, +another wounded honour because of the lawsuit brought and the +flight in which they conspired, wherefrom the adultery had +followed, the cause of honour should be given attention, as it is +the graver and consequently the more proportionate to the crime. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Likewise the penalty should not be increased in view of the +place of the crime, because the defence of one's honour is so +justifiable, and the anger and commotion of mind arising therefrom +is so just, that reason for it cannot be demanded, as Merlin +Pignatelli [Citation] holds, because Giovanni Francesco de +Carrillo [Citation] speaks of an insult offered in prison. And +No. 29 approves the decision for the reason that greater reverence +is due to churches and other places consecrated to God, +and in which the King of Kings and Lord of Lords dwells in +essence; and yet one who commits crime in them from just anger +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">34</a></span> +and grievance is excused; for he asserts that all Canonists and +other authorities there alleged by him unanimously acknowledge +this.</p> + +<p>More readily, therefore, should this conclusion follow in our +case, since the said Francesca was not staying in a formal prison, +but was merely keeping her home as a prison, under security of +300 scudi, that she would not depart therefrom; because one +who has given bond and has sworn not to leave a place is neither +in chains nor in custody. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Lucano holds that there are differences between being kept in +chains and being committed under bond, etc. And Farinacci +holds that the word "custody" should be more strictly interpreted +than the word "chains." [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Even if, therefore, Count Guido had confessed that he killed +his own wife, his father-in-law, and his mother-in-law, with the +complicity and aid of the above-named helpers, he should not be +punished with the ordinary penalty, for reasons given above. +And much more readily should we follow this opinion since we can +see that he confessed only that he gave commands for mutilating +his said wife (<i>ad sfrisiandum</i>), if I may use the word of the +authorities. In this case he is not to be held responsible for the +subsequent death of his wife and of the others. Decian, <i>cons. +622, no. 4</i>, in this very condition, holds that one giving orders +can be punished only for the manner of committing the crime for +which bodily punishment cannot be inflicted.</p> + +<p>Thus far the Fisc has been unwilling to rest satisfied with such +a qualified confession. Yet since he claims the right to torture +the accused for proving some further pretended truth, the +torture shall be simple; nor can the torment of the vigil be +inflicted; because the Constitution given out by Pope Paul Fifth, +of sacred memory, for the reformation of the courts of the City, +stands in the way of that. This is included among his Constitutions +as the 71st. By this it was decreed that such torment +could not be inflicted unless these two features jointly concur: +namely, that the crime be very atrocious and that the accused +be burdened with the strongest proofs. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But a crime is said to be "very atrocious" provided it is one +for which a penalty more severe than mere death should be +inflicted, such as useless mutilation, burning, and the like. +<i>Farinaccius qu. 18, num. 68</i>, etc. And such a death, as ignominious +and infamous, has no place with the persons of nobles. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Hence it is much less so here, because we are not arguing about +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">35</a></span> +the death penalty even, which does not enter into the present +case for reasons given above. And Gabriellus speaks to this +effect on the point that such a crime may not be said to be +qualified.</p> + +<p>What has been said in favour of Guido, the principal, also +stands in favour of the aforesaid Blasio, Domenico, Francesco, +and Alessandro; because they cannot be punished with the +ordinary penalty, but only with the same penalty as the principal. +[Citation.] Baldo cites a case under the statute which +shows that one under bann for a certain crime cannot be killed +save by the enemy who had him put under bann; and he says +that if the enemy has him assassinated, the assassin is not +punished. And he gives this reason, that what is permissible +in the person of the one giving the order should be held as permissible +in the one to whom orders are given; and he says it +had been so held in a case under that law. Castro [Citation] +holds that when one is permitted under the statute to take +vengeance upon a person who has given him offence, he is also permitted +to assemble his friends, to afford him aid, and that they +shall go unpunished, just as the principal does. He also asserts +that Jacobus Butrigarus [Citation], held thus, in <i>cons. 277</i>, +where he speaks of the case of a husband who had assembled +men to beat one who had wished to shame the modesty of his +wife, he ordered his wife to pretend to give ear, and when the +intriguer had come, murder was committed. And he says that +men brought together in this way should be spared, because such +an assembly was permissible for the husband, who was principal. +[Citation.] Jason holds that in any vengeance permitted by +law, one cannot demand it of another; yet he to whom it is +permitted may take fellows and accomplices with him for the +same act, and if they kill in company with him they shall not be +held to account for the murder nor for the aid they have given; +and he says that this opinion should be much kept in mind. +Cæpollinus also illustrates this in several cases, especially in that +of certain men who had killed one keeping the company of the +sister of the man who had assembled them; and he says that they +should not be punished, just as the principal was not, and he +gained his point so that it was thus adjudged. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Soccini also holds it should be thus adjudged, unless one wishes +to say that they should be punished with a slighter penalty than +the principal, as often happens in the case of auxiliaries. And +he speaks in our very circumstances of men assembled by a +husband for the sake of killing one who had polluted his wife. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">36</a></span> +In these same circumstances, see also Parisius. [Citation.] +Carera [Citation] speaks of a father who had his daughter (who +had been keeping bad company) killed by an assassin; and he +says that neither the father nor the murderer are to be held to +account. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Marsilius also, after placing in the very beginning this principle +that when one matter is conceded all seem to be conceded which +lead thereto, draws inference therefrom for the present case and +many reasons for it are adduced. Cassanis also [Citation] holds +that men assembled in this way are not held responsible either +for the murder or for the aid furnished, if they do the killing in +the company of the principal. And in these same circumstances +Garzonus speaks, decision 71, throughout.</p> + +<p>Nor does it stand in the way of our reasoning that one of the +aforesaid defendants had inflicted wounds with his own hands, +or had killed one of the victims; as Francesco has confessed that +he inflicted four or five wounds in the back of Francesca Pompilia. +Even in these circumstances the rule holds good that +auxiliaries shall not be punished with greater penalty than the +principal. And so affirm individually the following authorities +among those recently cited. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And Garzoni testifies that it was so adjudged in the said +decision 71, where we read: "Or he may have with himself +associates for this act," and if they kill the adulterers in company +of the principal they are held to very slight account, +either for the murder or for the aid given, and it was so +adjudged.</p> + +<p>And even in the more extreme case of one killing by assassination, +and consequently in the absence of the principal, this is the +opinion of Baldo [Citation], where we read: "And now it is +inquired whether an assassin is ever punished, and I say he +is not; because what is permitted in the person giving command +is also permitted in the person commanded." Castro [Citation] +also says: "Because what I can do of myself I can have done +through my helpers who are necessary for that purpose." And +Afflitto [Citation] says: "Either with one's own hands, or by +help of another, even with the influence of money, and thus by +an assassin; for Baldo says on this same point: 'What is +permitted in the person giving command is also permitted in +the person commanded'; and he witnesses that it was so +adjudged." [Citations.] Marta [speaks as follows]: "Much +more so because authorities affirm that a husband, who on +account of fear cannot kill the adulteress, may even by the help +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">37</a></span> +of money demand of another that he kill her, and neither of +them is then to be punished."</p> + +<p>But whatever Caballus [Citation] may say to the contrary, he +bases his opinion upon Castro and Rollandus. Castro, however, +favours our opinion, as is to be seen in No. 3. Rollandus +should not be given heed; for when he offers this very same +opinion about the statute which permits any one to take vengeance; +and says that since this kind of permission is personal, +it cannot be passed on from one to another, this opinion of his +is expressly contrary to the teaching of Baldo, Castro, Jason, +and others, whom we have alleged above in paragraph <i>quae +dicta sunt</i>. And since this opinion of ours is milder and more +equitable, it should hold good, as Jason decides on this point. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>Nor can the punishment be increased because of the alleged +carrying of prohibited arms; because the latter offence is +included then with the real crime. [Citations.] In Guazzin we +read that this is so, even if for the carrying of the arms a greater +penalty would be inflicted [than for the principal offence]. And +so, whenever it is evident that the crime has been committed for +honour's sake and for a just grievance, as in the present case, the +carrying of the arms may go unpunished, or at least it should not +be punished with a more severe penalty than should be imposed +for the principal crime itself. Thus Policardus [Citation] well +affirms when speaking of arms which are considered treacherous +by the Banns.</p> + +<p>These claims should hold good more readily as regards +Domenico and Francesco, who are foreigners, and are therefore +not included in any of the Apostolic Constitutions or Banns, +which prohibit the bearing of arms under very heavy penalties. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Especially since they are minors, as is made clear in the course +of the trial, pp. 35 and 304; in which case they are likewise not +bound by these Constitutions and Banns, which give judgment +upon the crime of a minor. For the power to make and establish +such regulations was lacking in the Prince or public official +concerned. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Such are the matters which, in view of the excessive scantiness +of time, I have been able to collect in discharge of my duty for +the defence of these poor prisoners. Nor do I at all distrust +that my Lords Judges, when they see that too little has been +said, will wish to supply and offer what is lacking out of the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">38</a></span> +high rectitude for which they are distinguished. For this would +be quite in accord with the decree of Emperors Diocletian and +Maximian, as related. [Citation.] And they will follow the +advice of Hippolitus Marsilius, famous in criminal proceedings, +who says that a judge is obliged by his office to seek out grounds +of defence for the accused. [Citations.]</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Desiderio Spreti</span>, <i>Advocate for the Poor</i>.</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0">[<a name="ft3" id="ft3">File-title of Pamphlet 3.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor in<br /> +Criminal Cases</i>:</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>In behalf of Blasio Agostinelli and his<br /> +Associates, Prisoners, against<br /> +the Fisc.</i></p> + +<p><i>Memorial of fact and law.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA HOMICIDIORUM<a name="pamphlet3" id="pamphlet3"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">41</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 3.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord:</p> + +<p>The plea of injured honour which redeems Count Guido from +the rigorous penalty that should follow for the commission of +murders, likewise urges mitigation of the ordinary penalty for +Blasio and the associates who had hand in the murder, even +though it may be pretended that they were paid thereto. For +it is taken for granted that we are dealing with a case far removed +from assassination, because of the presence of a person +who had real cause for vengeance, as the following authorities +think in common. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>There has been the strongest controversy among authorities +as to whether a father or husband may demand of any one except +his son the murder of his daughter or of his adulterous wife. +And divided on the two sides of the question, they have contended +strongly. [Citation.] Yet the majority are in favour of +the affirmative and of the milder sentence; and often, in the +event of such a murder, it has evidently been so adjudged. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>But since this question lies outside of our line of argument, it +would be vain and quite useless labour to take it up, nor is time +to be wasted when we are so hard pressed for it. For we are +evidently dealing with auxiliaries, assembled for committing +homicide, according to the thought of the Fisc. Hence the conditions +of a mere "mandatory" are not applicable; because of +the immediate presence of the principal in the crime; for when +he also lays hand to the crime, those who do likewise are not +called mandatories, but auxiliaries and helpers. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Furthermore, just as Guido himself is freed from the death +penalty because of the said plea of injured honour, so likewise +are his allies and auxiliaries freed, as the following authorities +unanimously assert. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Those who are cited in support of the opposite view do not +pronounce opinion in our peculiar circumstances, but speak +of a husband demanding of another the murder of his adulterous +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">42</a></span> +wife, and not of auxiliaries who do the killing in company with +the husband, as in our case. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>In such contingency, auxiliaries who give aid to a husband +while killing his adulterous wife have always enjoyed the same +indulgence as the principal himself; that is, they always escape +the capital penalty, and indeed go entirely unpunished. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor does the distinction of Caballus make any difference, where +he holds that auxiliaries may indeed assist with impunity a +husband or a father killing a wife or daughter respectively, in +order that these may kill the more safely; but that they cannot +lend a hand and actually kill; for in the latter case they are to +be held accountable for the murder. Because, for foundation +in making such a distinction, he plants his feet upon Paolo de +Castro. [Citation.] But this is so far from proving his purpose +that it rather turns back on him remarkably to his own injury. +For after the latter sets before himself this kind of a difficulty, +under No. 2, he adds: "But I hold entirely the contrary: that +neither the one who did the killing nor he who made the assembly +(as it may be called) are to be held for the murder for the purpose +of inflicting the capital penalty."</p> + +<p>This is also true in the council of Rollandus a Valle. [Citations.] +May that learned authority pardon me; for even if he +does attempt to confute Paolo de Castro in the said 154th +council, which is in our favour, under the pretext that he speaks +contrary to the common opinion, this claim does not suffice in +view of the above-cited authorities. And if there were time, +I would demonstrate this more clearly.</p> + +<p>Furthermore, Rollandus alleges Parisius, <i>cons. 154, lib. 4</i>. But +he could well omit that, because No. 22 proves expressly contrary +to him on its very face, where it says: "Under our very +conditions was given that excellent decision of Paolo de Castro +in the before-cited council. In stronger circumstances (which +also include the present case) he concludes that those who knew +of, or were present, or were associated with a husband in the act +of the said murder, and who furnished him aid, ought not to be +punished with a greater penalty than the principal, according +to the rule concerning auxiliaries, beside the accurate authority +of Marsilius." And he concludes that at the very worst, when +the utmost rigour of it is considered, they should not be punished +with more than a temporary banishment.</p> + +<p>Furthermore, Rollandus in the said council is expressly confuted +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">43</a></span> +by Facchinus. [Citation.] Nor is this without vital +reason. For just as a qualification that modifies a crime in the +principal delinquent increases it also for the auxiliaries, whenever +they are aware of it, so all sense of equity demands that a +qualification that diminishes the penalty for the principal, even +though it be unknown to the auxiliaries, shall act in favour of +them also. [Citations.] Hence Caballus remains without a +stable foundation, and is opposed to the opinion of the many +doctors here alleged, who make no distinction between those +who simply assist and those taking a hand in the murder; and +indeed all of them speak of auxiliaries. Furthermore, it is found +that this has often been the judgment, even in the more extreme +circumstances of one commanded to a murder, as was said +above. And so strong is the plea of injured honour that not +only does it extend its protection to mere mandatories, but even +to mandatories whose case is modified by the circumstance of +assassination. And it causes them to be absolved, as we find +that it was so decided. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Hence if both mandatories and assassins are redeemed from +the ordinary death penalty, whenever they kill an adulteress +at the command of the husband, it necessarily follows that the +distinction of Caballus is not a true one, nor is it accepted in +practice. For if they are mandatories, we cannot deny that +they may kill with their own hands; and nevertheless, not to +speak of the other decisions cited above, Clar. [Citation] testifies +such a decision favourable to the accused was handed down, +contrary to the opinion of Caballus.</p> + +<p>If, therefore, Blasio and his fellows are not to be punished +with the death penalty for affording aid in the murders, vain is +the question whether they can be subjected to the torment of +the vigil for the purpose of having the very truth from their +own mouths. For this procedure demands two requisites: one +that the most urgent proofs stand against the accused, and the +other that the crime be very atrocious, according to the prescript +of the Bull. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And although the powers of this Tribunal are very great for +the dispensing with one of the said requisites, yet I have never +seen the said torment of the vigil inflicted unless when there +was no doubt that the crime, for which the Fisc was trying to +draw confession from the accused, deserved the capital penalty. +We cannot believe that the prosecution expects to make a case +to this end because of the pretended conventicle; since those +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">44</a></span> +who are assembled are not to be held under the penalty for +conventicle, but only the one who assembled them is so held, +as Baldo well asserts. [Citations.] Nor in this case can the +penalty for the asserted conventicle be made good against Count +Guido himself, since the cause for which he assembled the men +aids him in evading the penalty; inasmuch as one may assemble +his friends and associates for the purpose of regaining his +reputation. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>For this has been well proved, that whenever any one for just +grievance assembles men to avenge his injury, he has not incurred +the crime and penalty of conventicle.</p> + +<p>And although Farinacci, <i>quaest 113, n. 55</i>, declares that this +holds good provided the vengeance be immediate, but that it is +otherwise if the vengeance be after an interval, yet I pray that +it be noted that in either case, if it concern vengeance for a +personal injury (in which conditions he himself speaks), and +therefore when for an injury which wounds the honour, such +vengeance is at all times said to be taken immediately. For +such an injury always urges and presses, because it should +be termed the restoration and reparation of honour (which +the one injured in his reputation could not otherwise accomplish), +rather than vindication and vengeance, as we believe +was satisfactorily proved in our other plea in behalf of Count +Guido.</p> + +<p>But all further difficulty ceases with this consideration: +prosecution can be brought for conventicle, if the men were +assembled for an evil end and no other crime followed therefrom; +but when, according to the sense of the Fisc, they have been +called together for committing murders, and these are really +committed, no further action can be taken as regards the prohibited +conventicle, but rather for the murders themselves; for +the assembling of the men tended to this same effect. [Citations.] +And it is for this reason more particularly; because +when the beginning and the end of an act are alike illegal, the +end is given attention, and not the beginning, as Bartolo teaches +us. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>It is to be added still further, that the assembling of men is +not illegal in itself; indeed it is possible for it at some times to +be both permissible and worthy of approval, as in the cases +related by Farinacci. But it is illegal because of its evil consequences +and the base end for which it is usually made. Hence, +as the assembling of men is prohibited, not in itself, but because +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">45</a></span> +of something else, the end ought to be considered rather than +what precedes the end.</p> + +<p>Nor should the rigorous penalty of death be inflicted at all +upon Domenico Gambassini and Francesco Pasquini for the +pretended carrying of arms of illegitimate measure; because +they are foreigners and had not stayed long enough in the +Ecclesiastical State so that their knowledge of this law could be +taken for granted. Nor ought it to be inflicted upon the others; +for even if the death penalty is threatened by the Constitutions +and Banns for the bearing or retention of them; yet since the +carrying of this kind of arms is not prohibited for reasons in +itself, but because of the pernicious end which follows it, or can +follow it; and because this bearing of arms was looking towards +the said murders; and because these, although they are not +entirely permissible, are not utterly without excuse, the crime +of carrying such arms should be included with the end for which +they were carried; because the one is implied in the other, +nor may the means seem worse than the end. And although, +according to the opinion of some persons, the penalty for carrying +arms is not to be confused with the crime committed with +them, whenever the latter is the graver, yet this seems to be so +understood when a crime is committed with them which is +entirely illegal and without excuse. But this is not so when +the crime is deceased and extenuated, and indeed excused in +part, because of the reason for which it was committed.</p> + +<p>In any case, the bearing of arms, according to common law, is +but a slight crime. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Although by special Constitutions and Banns the penalty has +been increased almost to the highest possible point, yet this kind +of increase does not change the nature of the crime. And just +as in the eyes of the common law, torture is not inflicted for +getting the truth from those indicted for the said carrying of +arms, in view of the insignificance of the crime, in like manner +it cannot be inflicted by the force of Constitutions and Statutes +which have increased the penalty. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And this is especially true in the case of the torment of the +vigil, which cannot be inflicted for a crime that is not in its very +nature most atrocious, but that is held as such, so far as the +penalty is concerned, merely by the strength of a decree. This +holds good unless indeed the nature of that crime is changed +according to the method of proceeding in it. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>And we see in the Banns of our Illustrious Lord Governor that +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">46</a></span> +he expressly declared this, when he wished to proceed with the +torment of the vigil in cases in which he could not proceed +legally; that of a certainty he would not do so. Nor would he +indeed have done this, if he could have inflicted such tortures +in the case of crimes which are not capital by common law, +but are to be expiated with the death penalty by the rigour of +the Banns.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Giacinto Arcangeli</span>, <i>Procurator of the Poor</i>.</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft4" id="ft4">File-title of Pamphlet 4.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor in<br /> +Criminal Cases</i>:</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE<br /> +with qualifying circumstance.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For the Fisc.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Summary.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="b1 center p6"><a name="pamphlet4" id="pamphlet4"></a>SUMMARY</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">49</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 4.</span>]</p> + +<p class="center p2"><i><a name="procno1" id="procno1"></a>No. 1.</i>—<i>The sworn testimony of a witness as to the poverty of said +Count Guido Franceschini and the miseries suffered by the +Signori Comparini while they stayed in his home in the city +of Arezzo.</i></p> + +<p class="right"> +<i>June 24, 1694.</i></p> + +<p>Angelica, the daughter of the deceased Pietro and Johanna +Battista of Castelluccio, in the Diocese of Arezzo, about 35 years +of age, was examined by me on behalf of Pietro Comparini, +against any one whomsoever, and put on permanent record; as +to which testimony, she took oath to speak the truth, as is seen +below.</p> + +<p>I tell you in all truth, sir, that while I was staying in Arezzo +last January in the home of Signora Maddalena Baldi Albergotti, +the chance was offered me to go and serve Signora Beatrice +Franceschini and her sons, etc. I decided to do so, and when I +had gone to the home of the Signori Franceschini I spoke with +the said Signora Beatrice. She drew me aside into a little room +and told me that she would take me as a servant, but that I +should never have any private dealings with the two old people +who were in the house; one of them was Signor Pietro Comparini +and the other Signora Violante, his wife. She charged me still +further that if either of the two old people chanced to call me +into their chamber, I should not go without first asking her permission. +On these terms I accepted the service. After I had +entered thereupon, I noticed that Signora Violante stayed in her +room most of the time, weeping, and though the Comparini were +stiff with cold, the room was without fire. Hence I took pity +on her, and without the knowledge of Signora Beatrice, I took +the coals from my own brazier and carried them to her. But +no sooner did I offer them to her than Signora Violante ordered +me out of the room, lest Signora Beatrice might take offence +that I had done this act of charity. Also, once among the many +times, when Signora Beatrice found it out she made me leave +the coals in the fireplace and snatched the shovel from my hands, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">50</a></span> +and threatened me, saying that if she had wished it she herself +would have come to bring it; because she did not want me to +do any service whatsoever for the said Signori Comparini. And +the Comparini could not even speak among themselves, because +Signor Guido Franceschini, the Canon Girolamo his brother, and +Signora Beatrice, their mother, would stand at one door or +another of the apartment and listen to what the said Signori +Comparini were saying to one another. This occurred every +evening and morning until the said Signor Pietro left the room +and the house. And when he returned at night they were unwilling +for me to make a light for him on the stairway. And +once when Signor Pietro came back home about half-past six in +the evening, and I heard him scrape his feet, I took up the lamp +to go and meet him. But Signor Guido noticing that, snatched +the lamp from my hands, telling me that I had better keep still, +and that I had better not approach unless I wished to be pitched +out of the window. And this seemed all the worse to me, because +when I first entered upon the service of the said Franceschini I +had heard it said around the house that one evening, as Signor +Pietro was coming back home, he had fallen, while ascending the +same steps without a light, and that he had made a very ugly +bruise, because of which he had had to keep his bed for many +days. At the same time, while I was in the said service, it +chanced one morning at breakfast that the Franceschini gave +some offence to Signora Violante, because of which a mishap +befell her. For no sooner had she reached her own room than she +threw herself into a straw-chair and swooned away. When +Signora Francesca Pompilia, wife of the said Signor Guido, +found it out, she began to weep and to cry out with a loud voice, +saying, "My mother is dying." Whereupon I ran to Signora +Violante and began to unlace her, and turned to bring her a +little vinegar and fire. But because there was no fire I took +some wood and put it in the fireplace to kindle it. When +Signora Beatrice saw this she snatched the wood from the fire, +in great anger, and told me to take the ashes, which were quite +enough to warm her feet. So I took the ashes that were in the +fireplace, but because of the intensely cold weather they were +cool when I reached the room where the Signora Violante was +half dead. Accordingly, the Signora Pompilia and I, both of us +weeping, unclothed Signora Violante and put her in the bed, +which was as cold as ice. And because I was crying when I +returned to the kitchen, after having put Signora Violante to +bed, Signora Beatrice said to me: "Do you want me to take a +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">51</a></span> +little hemp and wipe your eyes?" Signora Francesca Pompilia +also heard this, and she made some complaint to Signora Beatrice +who did not want me to return to the room again nor to make +a little gruel, as Signora Violante had ordered.</p> + +<p>It happened a few days later, during the month of February +following, that while the Signori Franceschini, Francesca Pompilia, +Signor Pietro, and Signora Violante were at the table, they +began talking of their purpose of sending me away, as the +Franceschini had already dismissed me from service. When +Signora Francesca Pompilia, who was at the table with the others +as I have said above, heard this, she remarked to Signor Pietro +and Signora Violante: "Do you know why they wish to send +her away? They believe she wished to censure me because +Signora Beatrice said some days ago that she would take hemp +and wipe the tears from her eyes, when she was weeping over +the accident that happened to you, mother." Then Signor +Pietro spoke up and asked the Signori Franceschini to keep me +in their good graces for eight or ten days more, for if he wished +to return to Rome with Signora Violante he would take me with +them. And he said he could expect this favour at their hands, as +it was the first he had ever asked of them. To this, none of the +Franceschini replied; but Signor Guido rose from the table and, +approaching me, gave me two very good licks. The others then +came up. While he was doing this, the Canon, his brother, also +gave me some kicks, and his mother struck me and told me to +leave at once. As soon as Signora Violante saw and heard this +she took pity on me and exclaimed to the said Signori: "Where +do you wish the poor thing to go now?" And all the Franceschini +with one accord said to Signora Violante: "You get out +with her, too." And they called her "slut," and other insulting +names, so that Signora Violante went to her room to put on her +wraps. The Canon drew a sword and ran after her into the room +and shut the door. I, fearing that he would inflict some wounds +upon Signora Violante, ran to enter the room and found that the +Canon had locked himself within. So myself and Signor Pietro +and Francesca Pompilia began to weep and to cry out for help, +thinking that the Canon would kill Signora Violante there inside. +And after some little time, I left the house, while the said couple +and Signora Francesca Pompilia were still making outcry to the +Signori Franceschini.</p> + +<p>During all the time I remained in the service of the said +Signori Franceschini at Arezzo, as I have said above, I can say +of a truth that every morning and evening at the table I served +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">52</a></span> +the said Signori Franceschini, Signora Francesca Pompilia, +Signor Pietro, and Signora Violante Comparini. For the food +of all this tableful, the Franceschini bought on Saturday a sucking +lamb, on which they spent, at most, twelve or fourteen +<i>gratie</i>. Then Signora Beatrice cooked it and divided it out for +the entire week. And the head of the lamb she divided up for a +relish three times, and for the relish at other times she served +separately the lights and intestines. During the days of the +week when they ate there was no other sort of meat on the table +to satisfy the needs of all the tableful. When he did not buy +the lamb on Saturday, as I have said, Signor Guido gave money +to Joseph, the houseboy, to buy two pounds of beef. Signora +Beatrice herself put this to cook every morning, nor was she +willing for the rest to meddle with it, and they ate therefrom at +the table and carved for the evening meal. And because this +meat was so tough that Signor Pietro could not eat it (as they +had not cooked it enough), Signor Pietro did without eating +meat, for the most part, and ate only a little bread, toasted and +in bad condition, and a morsel of cheese. Thus Signor Pietro +passed the days when they bought beef. On fasting days he ate +vegetable soup with a little salted pike, and sometimes a few +boiled chestnuts. But always, whether on fasting days or not, +the bread was as black as ink, and heavy, and ill-seasoned. +Then the wine which served for the table was but a single flask; +and as soon as the wine was poured into this, Signora Beatrice +made me put in as much more of water. And so I made out to +fill the wine flask, half of it being water, and very often there +was more water than wine. This flask she put on the table, and +ordinarily it sufficed for all those eating, although at most the +flask did not hold more than 3½ <i>foghliette</i> [half-pints] according +to Roman measure.</p> + +<p>Furthermore, I say that, not many days after I had left this +service, it was public talk throughout Arezzo that Signor Pietro +had gone home about half-past six in the evening and had found +the street door shut so that he could not open it, and he was +obliged to knock. When Signora Violante saw that no one +about the house was going to open the door, she herself went +downstairs to do so, but the door was locked with a key. And +although she called Signor Guido and others who were in the +house, yet no one stirred to go and open it. Therefore Signor +Pietro went to sleep at the inn, and in the morning returned to +see Signora Violante and Signora Francesca Pompilia. It was +likewise said throughout Arezzo that when Signor Pietro complained +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">53</a></span> +at having been locked out of the house by the Canon, +and when both Signor Pietro and Signora Violante reproached +them bitterly about it, a new quarrel arose among them, and +because of it both the Signori Comparini were driven out of the +house. Signora Violante was received at the home of Signor +Doctor Borri, where she dined that evening and spent the night. +And Signor Pietro went to the inn to dine and sleep.</p> + +<p>When I heard that, I went to the house of Signor Borri to see +Signora Violante, but was not admitted. And the wife of +Signor Borri told me to go and tend to my own affairs. For she +did not wish the Franceschini, who lived opposite, to perceive +that I had gone there to see Signora Violante, as some disturbance +might arise therefrom. Then the next morning I +went to the inn, where I had been told Signora Violante had +gone to find Signor Pietro, but I did not find either of them, and +was told by the host that they had gone out. So, not knowing +where to find them, I returned to the home of Signora Maddelena +Albergotti, where I was staying. And I heard afterwards that +both Signor Pietro and Signora Violante had returned to the +Inn, where they had breakfasted. Then by the interposition of +the Governor of Arezzo they were reconciled with the Franceschini, +and they returned indeed to the house of the latter. I +heard also that the Franceschini continued to maltreat and +insult the said couple, as they had continually done while I was +in their service. Therefore they were finally obliged to leave +Arezzo and go back to Rome.</p> + +<p>All the abovesaid matters I know from having seen and heard +the ill-treatment, which the Franceschini inflicted upon the +Comparini and the insults which they offered them and Signora +Francesca Pompilia; and likewise from having heard them +talked about publicly throughout Arezzo, where it is known to +every one and is notorious, and where there is public talk and +rumour about it.</p> + +<p class="center p2"> +<i><a name="procno2" id="procno2"></a>No. 2.</i>—<i>Various attestations as to Francesca's recourse to the +Bishop and Governor because of the cruelty of her husband +and relatives.</i></p> + +<p class="right"> +<i>June 17, 1697.</i></p> + +<p>To whomsoever it may concern:</p> + +<p>We, the undersigned, attest as true: That Signora Francesca +Pompilia Comparini, wife of Signor Guido Franceschini, has +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">54</a></span> +many and many a time fled from home and hastened now to +Monsignor the Bishop, and again to the Governor, and also to +the neighbours, because of the continual scolding and ill-treatment +which she has suffered at the hands of Count Guido +her husband, Signora Beatrice her mother-in-law, and the +Signor Canon Girolamo her brother-in-law. We know this from +having met her when she was fleeing as above, and from the +public talk and notoriety of it throughout the city of Arezzo. +In pledge of which, have we signed the present attestation with +our own hands this abovesaid day and year, etc.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4"> +I, <span class="smcap">Canon Alessandro Tortelli</span></span>, affirm the truth +to be as abovesaid, and in pledge thereto +have signed with my own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Marco Romano</span></span>, affirm the truth to be as +abovesaid, and in pledge, etc., with my +own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Antonio Francesco Arcangeli</span></span>, affirm the +truth to be as is contained above, with +my own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Cammillo Lombardi</span></span>, affirm as is contained +above, with my own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Francesco Jacopo Conti</span></span> of Bissignano, affirm +as is contained above, and in pledge, etc., +with my own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Urbano Antonio Romano</span></span>, a priest of Arezzo, +and at present Curate of the parish church +of San Adriano, affirm the truth to be as +is contained above, and in pledge thereto +have subscribed with my own hand.</p> + +<p>Then follows the identification of the handwriting in due form, +etc.</p> + +<p class="center p2"><i>Extract</i> <i>from a letter written by D. Tommaso Romani, uncle of +Guido Franceschini, to Pietro Comparini in Rome.</i></p> + +<p>Most Illustrious Sir, my most Honoured Master:</p> + +<p>I can not do less, etc., departure, she has been little like +the Signora Francesca, etc.; she fled from home, and went into +San Antonio. And thither ran also Signor Guido, the Canon, +and Beatrice, etc., in order that she might come back, and in +that belief the Signora Francesca returned home, etc. Yesterday, +Signora Francesca and my sister were in the Duomo at +sermon. At its close, while she was going away and was near +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">55</a></span> +the gate of Monsignore, Francesca fled into the Palace, which is +very near by. This was about seven o'clock in the evening, and +there was a fine row in the Palace, etc.</p> + +<p class="center p2"><i>Extract</i> <i>from another letter written by Bartholomeo Albergotti, a +gentleman, to Pietro Comparini.</i></p> + +<p>Most Illustrious Signor and most Cherished Master:</p> + +<p>At my return, etc., the Signora, his wife, has been melancholy, +and two evenings after your departure, she made a big disturbance, +because she did not wish to go and sleep with Signor +Guido her husband, etc. The day before Palm Sunday, the +Signora went, etc., to preaching, etc., and in leaving there, she +rushed into the Palace of the Bishop, etc. She took her station +at the head of the stairs and stayed there until half past six in +the evening; and neither Signora Beatrice nor Signor Guido +were able to make her return home. Yet the Bishop did not +give her an audience, but his secretary hastened thither and +urged Signor Guido and Signora Beatrice not to scold the +Signora his wife, etc. And after quite enough of such disputes, +they took her back home, etc.</p> + +<p class="center p2"><i><a name="procno3" id="procno3"></a>No. 3.</i>—<i>Deposition of Francesca as to the letters asserted to have +been written by her to Abate Franceschini, and previously +outlined by her husband; recorded in the prosecution brought +for her pretended flight.</i></p> + +<p class="right"> +<i>March</i> 21, 1697 [for May.]</p> + +<p>Francesca Comparini, when under oath, etc., when questioned +whether she had ever sent any letter to Abate Franceschini here +in the City, while she lived in Arezzo, replied:</p> + +<p>While I was in Arezzo I wrote at the instance of my husband, +to my brother-in-law Abate Franceschini here in Rome; but +as I did not know how to write, my husband formed the letters +with a pencil and then he made me trace it with a pen and ink +it with my own hand. And he told me that his brother had +taken pleasure in receiving such a letter of mine, written by +myself. This happened two or three times.</p> + +<p>When questioned whether, if she should see one of the letters +written as is told above, and sent to the City to the same Abate +Franceschini, she would recognise it, etc.</p> + +<p>She replied: If your Honour would cause me to see one of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">56</a></span> +the letters written by me, as above, and sent to Abate Franceschini, +I should recognise it very well.</p> + +<p>And when at my command the letter was shown to her, about +which there was discussion in the prosecution, and which begins +<i>Carissimo Cognato sono con questa</i>, and ends, etc., <i>Arezzo</i> 14 +<i>Giugnio</i> 1694, <i>affetionatissima Serva, e Cognata Francesca +Comparini ne Franceschini</i>.</p> + +<p>She responded: I have seen and have examined carefully this +letter shown me by the order of your Honour, which begins +<i>Carissimo Signor Cognato sono con questa</i>, etc., and ends <i>Francesca +Comparini, ne Franceschini</i>, and having looked at it, I think, +but cannot swear to it as the truth, that this is one of the letters +written by me to my brother-in-law, Abate Franceschini, in +conformity [to my husband's wishes] as is said above.</p> + +<p class="center p2"><i><a name="procno4" id="procno4"></a>No. 4</i>.—<i>The tenor of the letter written as above to Abate +Franceschini.</i></p> + +<p>Dearest Brother-in-law:</p> + +<p>I wish by this letter to pay my respects to you, and to thank +you for your efforts in placing me in this home, where, far +removed from my parents, I live now a tranquil life and enjoy +perfect safety, not having them around me. For they grieved +me night and day with their perverse commands, which were +against the law, both human and divine: that I should not love +Signor Guido, my husband, and that I should flee by night from +his couch. At the same time they made me tell him that I had +no congeniality with him and that he was not my husband +because I have no children by him. They also caused me to +run away often to the Bishop without any reason whatever, +and made me tell the Bishop that I wished to be divorced from +Signor Guido. And for the purpose of stirring up great discord +in the home, my mother told the Bishop, and Signor Guido, and +then the entire town, that the Canon my brother-in-law had +solicited me dishonourably, a thing that had never been thought +of by him. They urged me to continue these evil counsels, +which were far from right and far from the submission due to +my husband. And they left me at their departure their express +command, by my obligation to obey them, that I should kill my +husband, give poison to my brothers-in-law and my mother-in-law, +burn the house and break the vases and other things, in +order that in the eyes of the world it might not appear after their +departure that it was they who had counselled me to commit +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">57</a></span> +so many crimes. And finally at their departure, they left me, +as a parting command, that I should choose for myself a young +man to my taste, and with him should run away to Rome, and +many other matters, which I omit for blushing. Now that I +have not her at hand who stirred up my mind, I enjoy the quiet +of Paradise, and know that my parents were thus directing me +to a precipice, because of their own rage. Therefore, now that +I see in their true light these deeds proposed by the command +of my parents, I pray for pardon from God, from yourself, and +from all the world. For I wish to be a good Christian and a +good wife to Signor Guido, who has many times chidden me in +a loving manner, saying that some day I would thank him for +the reproofs he gave me. And these evil counsels which my +parents have given, I have now made known, and I acknowledge +myself</p> + +<p> +<span class="left45">Your most affectionate servant and sister,</span></p> +<p class="right"><span class="smcap">Francesca Comparini</span> <i>ne</i> <span class="smcap">Franceschini</span>. +</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Arezzo</span>, <i>June 14, 1694</i>.</p> + +<p>Outside directed to Abate Paolo Franceschini, Rome.</p> + +<p class="p2">[The <a name="procno5" id="procno5"></a>deposition of Pompilia is translated pp. <a href="#Page_90">90</a>-<a href="#Page_95">95</a> in its completer +form as given in the Summary for the Defence. The only +additional fact in this version is the date of the affidavit, +Monday, May 13, 1697. She had been arrested at Castelnuovo, +May 1.]</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><i><a name="procno6" id="procno6"></a>No. 6</i>.—<i>Attestation of priests and other persons, worthy to be accepted +in all respects; who gave Francesca, assistance even till +her death; they speak of her honesty, and her declaration that +she had never violated her conjugal faith</i>.</p> + +<p>I, the undersigned, barefooted Augustinian priest, pledge my +faith that inasmuch as I was present, helping Signora Francesca +Comparini from the first instant of her pitiable case, even to +the very end of her life, I say and attest on my priestly oath, in +the presence of the God who must judge me, that to my own +confusion I have discovered and marvelled at an innocent and +saintly conscience in that ever-blessed child. During the four +days she survived, when exhorted by me to pardon her husband, +she replied with tears in her eyes and with a placid and compassionate +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">58</a></span> +voice: "May Jesus pardon him, as I have already +done with all my heart." But what is more to be wondered at +is that, although she suffered great pain, I never heard her +speak an offensive or impatient word, nor show the slightest +outward vexation either toward God or those near by. But +ever submissive to the Divine Will, she said: "May God have +pity on me," in such a way, indeed, as would have been incompatible +with a soul that was not at one with God. To such an +union one does not attain in a moment, but rather by the habit +of years.</p> + +<p>I say further that I have always seen her self-restrained, and +especially during medical treatment. On these occasions, if her +habit of life had not been good, she would not have minded +certain details around her with a modesty well-noted and +marvelled at by me; nor otherwise could a young girl have been +in the presence of so many men with such modesty and calm +as that in which the blessed child remained while dying. And +you may well believe what the Holy Spirit speaks by the mouth +of the Evangelist, in the words of St. Matthew, chapter 7: "An +evil tree cannot bring forth good fruit." Note that he says +"cannot," and not "does not"; that is, making it impossible +to infer the ability to do perfect deeds when oneself is imperfect +and tainted with vice. You should therefore say that this girl +was all goodness and modesty, since with all ease and all gladness +she performed virtuous and modest deeds even at the very +end of her life. Moreover she has died with strong love for God, +with great composure, with all the sacred sacraments of the +Church, and with the admiration of all bystanders, who blessed +her as a saint. I do not say more lest I be taxed with partiality. +I know very well that God alone is the searcher of hearts, but +I also know that from the abundance of the heart the mouth +speaks; and that my great St. Augustine says: "As the life, +so its end."</p> + +<p>Therefore, having noted in that ever blessed child saintly +words, virtuous deeds, most modest acts, and the death of a +soul in great fear of God, for the relief of my conscience I am +compelled to say, and cannot do otherwise, that necessarily she +has ever been a good, modest, and honourable girl, etc.</p> + +<p>This tenth of January, 1698,</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, Fra <span class="smcap">Celestino Angelo</span></span> of St. Anna, barefooted +Augustinian, affirm as I have said above, with +my own hand. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">59</a></span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><i>Another attestation as above.</i></p> + +<p>We, the undersigned, being interrogated for the truth, have +made full and unquestioned statement on our oath, that we were +present and assisted at the last illness from which Francesca +Pompilia, wife of Guido Franceschini, died. She was often +asked by her confessors and other persons whether she had +committed any offence against the said Guido, her husband, +whereby she might have given him occasion to maltreat her in +such a manner as to cause her death. And she always responded +that she had never committed any offence against him, +but had always lived with all chastity and modesty. And this +we know from having been present during the said suffering, +and from having heard all these questions and responses while +we were giving her medical treatment, or otherwise assisting, +and from hearing her respond to these questions, as above, +during the four days while she was suffering from her wounds, +as we have seen and heard her; and we have witnessed her +dying the death of a saint.</p> + +<p>In pledge thereto we have signed this present attestation with +our own hands here in Rome this tenth of January, 1698.</p> + +<p class="i8"> +<span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Nicolo Constantio</span></span>, etc., who assisted at the treatment +of the said Francesca Pompilia during four +days, attest as above, etc.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, Fra <span class="smcap">Celestino Angelo</span></span> of St. Anna, barefooted +Augustinian, say that I was present from the first +instant of the case, even to the end of her life, and +was always ministering to her. She ever said, +"May God pardon him in heaven as I pardon him +on earth; but as for the matter they charge me +with, and for which they have slain me, I am +utterly innocent." In proof whereof she said that +God should not pardon her that sin, because she +had never committed it. She died as an innocent +martyr in the presence of another priest, to the +edification of all the bystanders, as I have affirmed +above with my own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Placido Sardi</span></span>, a priest, affirm with my own hand +as the abovesaid Father, Fra Celestino, has declared, +having been present as above. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">60</a></span></p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, the <span class="smcap">Marquis Nicolo Gregorio</span></span>, affirm as above with +my own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, the undersigned</span>, affirm what is contained in the +abovewritten statement, as well as in the attestation +of the reverend Father Celestino of Jesu and +Maria. I assisted the abovesaid Signora Francesca +Pompilia from the first, having picked her up +from the earth where she lay in utter weakness +because of her wounds. She had her head upon +the legs of Signor Pietro Comparini, who was +already dead. She made confession in my arms +to the Principal of the Greek College, because she +could neither rise up nor lie down. And from that +hour I never left her, but always ministered to her +even unto her death. She was the most exemplary +and edifying Christian I have ever seen. +For I saw her resigned to the divine will, and she +always relied upon her own innocence, etc.</p> + +<p class="i10">I, <span class="smcap">Giuseppe D'Andillo</span>, with my own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I,</span> the undersigned, attest and affirm what is contained +in all the said affidavits, from having assisted the +said Francesca Pompilia, etc.</p> + +<p class="i10"><span class="smcap">Dionysio Godyn</span>, with my own hand.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Luca Corsi</span></span>, affirm with my own hand as is contained +in all the said attestations, from having assisted +day and night as long as the malady of the former +Francesca Pompilia continued, and from having +heard as above.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Giovanni Battista Guitens</span></span>, apothecary, who have +assisted at the treatment and care of the said Francesca +Pompilia, affirm with my own hand as is contained +in all the above affidavits and attestations, +from having assisted continually throughout a +night and a day at the malady of the same.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">I, <span class="smcap">Giovanni Battista Mucha</span></span>, the boy of the said +Giovanni Battista Guitens, apothecary, affirm +with my own hand as is contained above in the +said attestation, from having assisted with the +former Francesca Pompilia.</p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">61</a></span> +Full and unquestionable statement is given by me the here +undersigned, Abate Liberato Barberito, Doctor of Theology, +that, as I was summoned to assist at the death of the said Signora +Francesca Comparini, I often noticed, and especially during an +entire night, that the above-named defendant suffered the pains +of her wounds with Christian resignation, and condoned with +superhuman generosity the offences of the one who had caused +her innocent death with so many wounds. I also observed +during the night the tenderness of the conscience of the above-named. +For she passed it in showing the unwavering feelings +of an heroic and Christian perfection. And this so much so +that I can attest that during the experience I have had, +having been four years Vicar in the Cure of Monsignor, the +Bishop of Monopoli, of blessed memory, I have never observed +the dying with like sentiments. And this is all the more so in an +evil, caused so violently by another. Therefore in pledge, etc. +Rome, this tenth day of January 1698.</p> + +<p class="i4">I, <span class="smcap">Abate di Liberato Barberito</span>, affirm as above, etc.</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft5" id="ft5">File-title of Pamphlet 5.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor of the<br /> +City in Criminal Cases:</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>In behalf of the Fisc, against<br /> +Count Guido Franceschini<br /> +and his Associates</i>.</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Memorial of fact and law of the Lord<br /> +Procurator General of the Fisc.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Church,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA EXCIDII<a name="pamphlet5" id="pamphlet5"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">65</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 5.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord:</p> + +<p>The deplorable slaughter of the entire Comparini family, which +occurred in this dear city of ours on the second night of the +current month of January, and the shedding of their blood, cries +out from earth to God for vengeance upon the criminals. And +in order that we may fulfil the obligations of the office we are +occupying, we have paid down the price of toil to narrate here +with faithful pen the series of events. From this, my Lords +Judges may readily see what laws may be applicable for a +decision as to this cause and for the punishment of the delinquents +for the same deed, etc., and so Barbosa says in his axioms +in jurisprudence, axiom 93, No. 1: "Just as from the deed the +law takes its rise, so from the deed the law dies."</p> + +<p>The series of facts, therefore, is as follows: Guido Franceschini +of the city of Arezzo, married Francesca Comparini, for +whom, by Pietro and Violante Comparini, there were promised +as dowry, among other matters, certain properties subject to a +reversionary interest. For they had brought this same Francesca +up in their home as their own daughter, and as such they +married her. Then, as the aforesaid Pietro and Violante had no +other children, they left their home in the City to go and live in +the home of Franceschini at Arezzo. There, for some time, they +continued to live together in peace; but, as often happens among +friends and relatives, contentions and quarrellings arose. On +account of these, the aforesaid Pietro and Violante left that home +and the city of Arezzo, and went back to Rome. In the meantime, +as the flame of this enkindled hatred increased, a lawsuit +was instituted as to the dowry once promised, but now denied by +Pietro, on the pretext that Francesca was not indeed the +daughter of the same Pietro and Violante, but that, after a +pretence of her birth had been made, she had been received and +brought up by them. And for this reason the said Guido and +Francesca could not hope for the inheritance of the properties +under the reversionary interest. But although Franceschini +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">66</a></span> +gained a favourable judgment on this point, yet when appeal +had been made on behalf of Pietro Comparini, Francesca +declared that she was ill-treated in the home of her husband by +himself, and therefore desired to leave that home. Accordingly +with the aid and companionship of Canon Caponsacchi, a relative +of the said Franceschini, as is supposed, she ran away. But +Franceschini had notice of his wife's flight and, following her up, +he overtook her at the tavern of Castelnuovo. There he went +to the governor of that place and saw to effecting the capture of +his wife and the Canon, as indeed followed. Then the quarrel +was continued. A criminal suit was brought in this Tribunal of +the Governor of the City; the process of action was arranged, +and the counsel on both sides was often heard, both by word of +mouth and in writing. At last it was decided that owing to lack +of proof of adultery the said Canon should be banished to Civita +Vecchia and Francesca should be held in safekeeping. But +because the Comparini claimed that the furnishing of food in the +safekeeping was the duty of Franceschini, and the latter declared +it lay with Comparini, the most Illustrious Lord Governor, +having first secured the consent of Abate Paolo, the brother of +Guido and his representative in the case, assigned the home of +the Comparini to Francesca as a safe and secure prison under +security.</p> + +<p>While these contests were still pending, both in the civil and +criminal cases, as well as in that for divorce brought by Francesca, +the wife, this same Franceschini schemed to take vengeance +upon the abovesaid. For the execution of this criminal +purpose he brought together Domenico Gambassini of Florence, +Alessandro Baldeschi of the region of Castello, Francesco +Pasquini Antonii of the Marquisate of Monte Acuto, and Blasio +Agostinelli of the town of Popolo, and dwelling at the Villa +Quarata. He provided them with swords and dagger, prohibited +by the Bull of Alexander VIII., and entered the City in +company with the aforesaid men. Approaching the home of +the Comparini, at the first hour of the night, he secured the opening +of the door to himself under the pretence of bringing a letter, +sent to Violante by the said Canon Caponsacchi, then staying at +Civita Vecchia. As soon as the door of the home was opened by +the said Violante, the aforesaid Guido and his companions immediately +set upon her. She was cut to pieces with their swords +and immediately fell dead. Pietro likewise was cut down and +died. Francesca, however, tried to hide under a bed, but was +found and wounded in many places. Then, as if God granted +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">67</a></span> +her the favour, she was not left utterly dead, though after a few +days she also passed away; and thus she could reveal this +monstrous crime. As soon as my Lord Governor had notice of +this, with most vigilant attention, he saw that the malefactors +were pursued beyond the City. Accordingly that same night, +they were discovered in the tavern at Merluccia with firearms +and illegal swords, still bloody, and were taken back to prison. +Then, when a case had been made against them, they were examined +as to the crime. Some of them indeed confessed it, and +although the others made denial of the management and knowledge +of the killing of the entire family, yet against them there +are most urgent presumptions of the knowledge and management +abovesaid. Furthermore, from the same prosecution the gravest +proofs have resulted, such as can be but slightly attacked and +controverted by the Defence.</p> + +<p>Hence, when this cause may be presented to receive judgment, +we believe that no foundation can afford defence for the criminals +to escape the capital penalty, so far as they have confessed their +crime, or can release those who have denied it from the rigorous +torture of the vigil. For what if the Defence do strongly argue +the question as to whether a husband who kills an adulterous +wife, not immediately and when found in adultery, but after an +interval, ought to be excused from the ordinary penalty of the +<i>Lex Cornelia de Sicariis</i>? Some authorities indeed give an +affirmative opinion for the excuse of the husband, as is to be seen +in Giurba. [Citations.] Yet all of these authorities for mitigating +the penalty upon a husband who kills his wife after an +interval are moved by this reason: That since the sense of injured +honour always oppresses the heart, it is difficult to restrain +just resentment; for this reason the defence of the honour is said +to be immediate when done as quickly as possible.</p> + +<p>But there are indeed many other authorities who stand by the +negative, asserting that a husband who kills his wife, otherwise +than when taken in adultery and in acts of passion, should be +punished with the ordinary penalty. [Citations.] Rainaldi +[Citation] says this opinion is the truer and the more advantageous +to the state, nor should one depart from it in giving +judgment. Sanzio says that it was often adjudged in this +Senate that a husband was not excused by adultery legitimately +proved, if he killed his wife after an interval; and for this reason, +because formerly, according to the law of Romulus, a husband +could kill his wife, but the <i>Lex Julia</i> permitted him to kill only +the vile adulterer, as Matthæus proves. [Citation.] +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">68</a></span></p> + +<p>But in this our present show of fact we believe we are dealing +with a matter outside of the difficulty of this proposed question. +For the authorities cited above for the contrary opinion hold +good, and should be understood to do so, whenever the contention +is about a husband who has killed his wife without excess +of law and with no concurring circumstances and aggravating +qualities, and when moved only by just grievance. But it is +otherwise when, as in our case, excess and contempt of law is +present and aggravating circumstances and qualities concur. +Laurentius Matthæus [Citation] testifies that, according to +common practice, such a distinction has been followed out. +And after he had affirmed that a husband should be excused +from the ordinary penalty and be punished more mildly, he +adds: "For these reasons, it is the common practice to weigh +the effect of the grievance and to punish only the excess; so +that if the suspicion of guile in the manner of killing is present +(as he considers any circumstance which tends toward treachery) +the penalty is aggravated."</p> + +<p>The aggravating circumstances which concur in our case are +indeed many, and they are so grave that any one of them is +enough reason for imposing the death penalty or for qualifying +the crime.</p> + +<p>The first of these is the assembling of armed men; for according +to decrees of the Governor of this City, the penalty of death +and of the confiscation of goods is inflicted upon the one assembling +the men; and this is true even if those assembled are but +four, as is read in chapter 82 of the same Banns. This circumstance +and quality cannot be evaded on the authority of certain +jurists who assert that it is permissible for a husband to kill his +wife, even by means of men thus brought together. For the +said authorities speak, and should be understood, in a case in +which a husband may kill with impunity an adulterer and his own +wife in the very act of adultery, or in the home of the husband. +But it is otherwise if she is killed after an interval, or outside +of the home of her husband; according to what is given. +[Citation.] Or these matters might hold good if in no other way +he could kill the adulterer and his wife. So think all authorities +who can be adduced in favour of the husband. This cannot be +said in our case since Franceschini, while following his wife +with firearms, could have taken vengeance at the inn of Castelnuovo. +But he had recourse to the judge, and chose the legal +way of punishing his wife and the Canon with whom she fled. +Or these claims would hold good if he had assembled a smaller +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">69</a></span> +number of men, whereby the crime of conventicle would not +have been established. And this is the more strongly to be +held because we are not concerned with a deed that is unpunishable, +and permissible by law, as I have said.</p> + +<p>Nor do we believe that the Defence can make a claim that the +husband may kill an adulterous wife after an interval with +impunity; for all the authorities who can be adduced in favour +of the husband free him indeed from the ordinary penalty, but +not from an extraordinary penalty, as those adduced by us +above in § <i>Hinc cum Causa</i> can be seen to hold. If therefore, +in our case, the husband committed a crime punishable in itself, +how could he assemble a number of men forming a conventicle +prohibited by the Banns, without incurring the penalty +threatened by them?</p> + +<p>The second quality and circumstance is the carrying of arms +contrary to the specification of the Constitution of Alexander +VIII., which is extended to the whole Ecclesiastical State. Still +less can the authority of jurists be alleged in excuse from this +threatened penalty, if the husband kill an adulterer and the wife +with prohibited arms. For aside from the response given by us +in the explanation of the first circumstance of assembling and of +conventicle (namely that these authorities hold good and should +be understood to apply only in cases permitted by law, and +therefore unpunishable), we say still further that they have very +little application as regards the arms we are discussing; since +the said Constitution prohibits not merely the carrying of such +arms, but even their retention, manufacture, or introduction into +the City and the Ecclesiastical State, under the penalty of +rebellion and criminal insult to the majesty of the law. And so +far as we are acquainted with such cases as are permitted by +law, the authority of these jurists should be understood to hold +good concerning arms, the carrying of which is indeed prohibited, +but not the retention and introduction under any pretext +whatsoever, even the pretext of justice; as is included in this +same Constitution § 1, where we read: "Or to carry them on +any pretext whatever, whether of military service or of the +execution of justice, and still less to keep them in one's home or +elsewhere." And in § <i>Ad haec</i> it prohibits even the introduction +of them: "the retention of them at home, in storehouses, and +elsewhere, their introduction into the Ecclesiastical State, and +their manufacture."</p> + +<p>If therefore the retention and introduction of such arms is +prohibited, even when on the pretext of executing justice, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">70</a></span> +ridiculous indeed would be Franceschini's pretence that he could +approach the City and the home of his wife with such arms to +vindicate after an interval this pretended offence of honour. +This is the more certain as the crime concerning such arms is grave +and of itself is punished with the capital penalty, as we have +proved. In this case, when the crime actually follows, if the +penalty for carrying the arms is greater than for the crime +itself, the penalty for the graver offence is held to apply, and +includes the lighter. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>The third circumstance is that Franceschini and the aforesaid +men committed the murders in the very home and dwelling-place +of the Comparini; because homicide is always said to be +qualified when it is committed in the home of the one slain; +since the home should be a safe refuge for its master, etc. +Then also Franceschini entered with changed garb; in which +case the murder is said to be committed <i>ex insidiis</i>. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>The fourth quality and circumstance is that the said Francesca +was under the power of the judge, since the home, as we have +said in our narrative of fact, was assigned to her under bond to +keep it as a safe and secure prison. And hence she was under +the protection of the court. [Citations.] And this is especially +true when arguing in favour of the one who is under protection +of the court, whatever may be said when arguing to his prejudice. +And therefore the law holds that one under the protection of the +court cannot be killed under less penalty than the death [of the +assassin]. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But all debate seems to cease since it is proven in the process +that the said Franceschini approached the said home with his +company of men with the thought and intent to kill not merely +Francesca, his wife, but also Pietro and Violante. These, as he +himself acknowledges, he hated with a deadly hatred, because +of the suit they had brought and because they had urged +Francesca to poison her husband and her brother-in-law, and +had kept his wife in their home so that still further, in the +continuation of the adultery, his honour was offended. But +aside from this, as we have said above, Francesca was placed +in the said home by the authority of the judge with the consent +of the brother of this same husband, and so the question does +not enter as to whether a husband may lawfully kill the relatives, +friends, and servants of his adulterous wife, even if he does +suspect them of affording their leave or assent to the wife committing +adultery; since the special rights and privileges conceded +to the husband should not be multiplied against the wife, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">71</a></span> +and be given greater scope, but rather should be strictly interpreted. +[Citation.] This holds good not merely when one is +arguing about the prejudice of a third party, but concerning +one's sole prejudice. [Citation.] In our very circumstances we +read that the permission cannot be passed from person to person. +[Citation.] Yet we can more truly declare that such an assertion +of adultery on the part of Franceschini is calumniously false; +for, in the very face of death, Francesca protested, to the very +damnation of her soul, that she had given no offence to her +husband's honour. This protestation is the more to be believed +since those about to die are not presumed to be unmindful of +their eternal salvation. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>The other causes adduced by Franceschini himself, so far as +they are true, can indeed prove hatred and enmity existing between +himself and the couple, which would tend in that direction +and so would serve to prove in him a cause for their premeditated +murder. But this is not sufficient to excuse him from the +ordinary penalty of death, which premeditated homicide altogether +demands. [Citations.] And it is for this reason, because +the laws prohibit private vengeance (that is, vengeance which +those without public office usurp to themselves because of their +hatred, by killing or otherwise injuring men). [Citations.] +Raynaldus affirms that in premeditated murder the ordinary +penalty is inflicted not merely upon the slayer himself, but also +upon all others who aid and give help, or concur in committing +the murder by their help or council. [Citations.]</p> +<div class="left45"> +<p class="center"> +<span class="smcap">Francesco Gambi</span>,<br /> +<i>Procurator General of the Fisc and of the<br /> +Reverend Apostolic Chamber</i>.</p> +</div> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft6" id="ft6">File-title of Pamphlet 6.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor in<br /> +Criminal Cases:</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE,<br /> +with qualifying circumstance.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For the Fisc, against<br /> +Count Guido Franceschini and his Associates.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Memorial of the law in the case by<br /> +the Advocate of the Fisc.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber</i>,<br /> +1698.</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA HOMICIDII CUM QUALITATE<a name="pamphlet6" id="pamphlet6"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">75</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet</span> 6.]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and most Reverend Lord Governor:</p> + +<p>Since the chief defence of Count Franceschini, the Accused, +as we have heard, consists in the pretended plea of injured honour, +by which he was moved to crime, it is the office of the Fisc to +disclose the lack of foundation for this plea, in order that this +atrocious and enormous crime may be punished with the due +penalty.</p> + +<p>Therefore I assume that we ought to examine the foundations +on which the asserted plea of injured honour may rest; namely +the flight of the unfortunate wife from the home of her husband +in company with Canon Caponsacchi, with whom she was taken +at the inn of Castelnuovo, and the pretended love-letters which +were put forward in the prosecution of Pompilia for the said +flight and departure. The pretended dishonesty of the wife is +drawn from these two; but along with them other proofs were +brought together in the said prosecution; the latter, however, +are either altogether stupid or equivocal, or else unproven. +This may be inferred from the dismission of the said Francesca, +his wife, merely with the precaution of keeping her home as a +prison and of the Canon with a three years' banishment to Civita +Vecchia. Such action shows that in this same prosecution there +was found by the Fisc no legitimate proof of dishonesty and of +the pretended violation of conjugal faith, which the husband had +charged against her.</p> + +<p>And indeed, from the defences then made and even from the +trial itself, a very just cause has clearly appeared, which forced +the luckless girl to flee from the home of her husband and to go +back to her own home, there to live safely and quietly with her +parents. Notorious indeed are the altercations which, on account +of the parsimony of the Franceschini home, straightway arose between +the parents of the wretched girl on the one hand, and the +Accused, his mother, and his brothers on the other hand. The +former in vain bewailed the fact that they had been deceived by +the show of no small opulence, on account of the false statement +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">76</a></span> +of an annual income of 1700 scudi, which was afterward shown +to have no existence. Indeed, while they stayed in the home +of the accused husband in Arezzo, they were so badly treated by +himself and his relatives that after a few months they were +obliged to leave it and return to the City. During the whole +time they lived there, contentions and reproaches throve continually +among them. The Comparini were indeed excited with +just indignation by the deception they had suffered. This is +evident from the letters of Abate Paolo Franceschini, which +presuppose these troubles and which were considered for the +Defence by the Procurator of the Poor. These prove that +hostility of mind had even then been conceived against the +unfortunate parents, especially the one written March 6, where +we read: "I write again to you that I do not wish to imitate him +in his manner of writing, not being of his mind to sow broadcast +in letters such words as would merit response by deeds and not +by words. And these are so offensive that I have kept them for +his reproof and mortification." And further on he says: "So +that if you give us trouble, which I will never believe, you yourself +will not be exempt therefrom." But sufficient proof results +from the letters, as the following advise. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And although these letters do not make clear the nature of +their altercations, yet some of them more than prove the +reproaches had so increased that their bitterness grew into hatred +as is evident from the letter of February 12, 1694, where we read: +"But hearing from the one side or other that the bitterness +between them, not to say the hatred, is increasing." It would +be all too easy for the Accused and the Abate, his brother, to +prove, by showing letters written to him, that the reproaches +were unjust and were occasioned by the Comparini themselves. +This is apparent from the tenor of the said letter, where we read: +"Because I feel that the enemy of God has put strife among +them, it is improper that I should fulfil my duty toward you of +a reply." But since the Franceschini did not show such letters, +the presumptive truth of these same complaints and of this +cause of complaint and altercation is strongly against the ones +thus concealing them. In such circumstances the Roman court +thus affirmed. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But the truth of the charge of ill-treatment toward the parents, +whom he was obliged by the dowry contract to provide with food, +is also to be drawn from the deposition of a servant, as given in +the Summary, <a href="#procno1">No. 1</a>. And since this would excite the pity of +any who read, it becomes all the clearer that, by such very ill-treatment +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">77</a></span> +of her parents, the mind of the wretched wife was +greatly exasperated; for she kept grieving in vain at seeing them +thus troubled; yes, and she was even prohibited from grieving.</p> + +<p>And any one may know that the return of her parents to the +City would indeed disturb with a considerable and very just grief +this wretched child who was not more than fifteen years old. +For she was destitute of all aid, and was left exposed to her +husband's severity, because of which she daily feared that she +was in peril of her life. In vain did she have recourse to the +Reverend Bishop and to the Governor, Summary, <a href="#procno2">No. 2</a>. In +vain was the interposition of certain noblemen tried; which had +proved utterly useless, as is evident from the letter of March 6, +where we read: "But what remedy can I give you, when so +many gentlemen friendly to both parties have interfered to +settle the troubles and it has not turned out well?" She might +indeed think that no other remedy was left her than to flee from +the abode of her husband and to seek again her father's home. +As therefore she fled to escape deadly peril, her flight can afford +no proof of dishonesty nor of the violation of conjugal faith; +for it is attributable to a lawful rather than to a criminal cause. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>But there was another urgent cause for her eagerly desiring to +seek her father's hearth, namely the ill-health of her father. +She speaks of this in the letter which mentioned that she cannot +look for the company of Gregorio Guillichini, and that this task +had to be remitted to the Canon [Caponsacchi]. Hence we can +well infer that she was arranging for the flight for legitimate +reasons.</p> + +<p>No reliance whatever can be placed in the letter written by +this same wife to Abate Franceschini. In that she thanks him +for having joined her in marriage with the Accused, his brother. +And she also acknowledges therein that, since the departure of +her parents, she was living a life of utter tranquillity; because +their evil persuasion, which was alienating her from her husband, +had ceased. She also reveals a very base plan that had been +proposed to her, namely, to destroy the entire household. Now +the wife in her sworn statement frankly confesses that she wrote +this letter to appease her husband, and that he had marked the +characters, which she had afterwards traced with a pen. This +statement is found in an extract from her sworn testimony as +given in our Summary, <a href="#procno3">No. 3.</a> And a mere reading of the said +letter so thrills one with horror that it is incredible that the +luckless girl could have written such matters to the injury and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">78</a></span> +detraction of her own parents, unless she had been compelled +thereto by fear of her husband. For this reason the same letter +is given in our Summary, <a href="#procno4">No. 4</a>.</p> + +<p>But even just ground of fear, because of which the luckless +girl was moved to flee, has come to light, namely, the lawsuit +brought by her father against the Accused for the nullification +of the dowry contract. This contract had been made on false +grounds; for Pietro had believed that he was promising the +dowry to his own daughter, but then, from a confession made +by the mother, he had found out that she was none such and that +Violante had made pretence of giving birth to the child for the +purpose of deceiving her husband and barring his creditors. +Since Pietro had assigned all his property as dowry (and indeed +it was of considerable value when we consider the quality of the +persons concerned) he soon raised a dispute about it. And we +may well fear that very grave and even deadly hatred arose therefrom. +Thereby the conjugal peace, which had been disturbed by +long-continued altercation, was utterly destroyed by recrudescent +hatred. For a lawsuit as to a considerable amount of money, +much more as to an entire property, would produce this effect, +as daily experience well teaches us and as Grammaticus and +others assert. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Such just fear should be well considered by a prudent judge, +who will take into account the circumstance of the persons and +of the time. [Citation.] In our case it may be absolutely +affirmed that these matters should be so considered, inasmuch +as not merely a girl of tender age (as was the unfortunate wife, +who was destitute of all aid and exposed to the severity of the +husband, who had sought her life with a pistol and had threatened +her with death on trivial suspicions), but even a woman of +greatest fortitude would be unable to bear being exposed to such +constant risk of her life and would see the necessity of taking +care of herself. And whatever the cause, even if it were merely +supposititious, it would be enough to excuse her according to the +text. [Citations.] And Canon Rainaldi holds, that it is enough +if one see the signs or acts of manifest desire, or preparations +thereto. How much more excusable and how worthy of pity +should Francesca be considered, since she had such an urgent and +such a well-verified cause for fleeing? Mogolon holds that the +mere sight of arms, even though the one having them does not +use them nor unsheathe them, is just cause for fear.</p> + +<p>Nor can presumption of dishonour and of violated conjugal +faith arise from the company of Canon Caponsacchi, with whom +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">79</a></span> +she fled, and for which flight he was condemned to three years' +banishment in Civita Vecchia. For the luckless girl was destitute +of all aid, and the demands of her age, of her sex, and of her +station in life, did not admit of her undertaking so perilous a +journey either alone, or in company with any baseborn woman. +For then, in escaping dangers at home, she might incautiously +expose herself to even graver perils; as might have happened +if while alone she had been overtaken by her husband in the +journey. Nor could she find any safer companion than this very +Canon, who was bound by friendship to the Canon Conti. And +the latter, who was a familiar friend and blood-relative of the +Accused, although he had great pity upon her condition, judged +it safer for her to flee with Caponsacchi, whom he believed to be +apt and far-seeing to bring about the desired end. Otherwise +she would have undertaken this flight with even greater risk. +Therefore this necessary and prudent choice of the lesser evil +excludes all suspicion of pretended dishonour. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>This suspicion is also excluded by the manner in which the +flight was put into effect, namely in hurrying to the City by the +direct route and with the greatest possible speed. For if the +unfortunate girl had fled for the purpose of satisfying her lust +with the same lover, the Canon Caponsacchi (as was charged +elsewhere and as is repeated now even more bitterly to prove +the plea of injured honour), she would either have delayed somewhere +out of the public highways, where she could not be seized +by the Accused, or she would not have approached the City with +such great speed. She would have done neither of these, unless +she were making the journey for the purpose of seeking again her +father's hearth, where she hoped to find security for her life and +her honour. It would be far too imprudent a plan for a lover to +take a wife from the home of her husband to some other place +where he could not possibly satisfy his lust. This improbability +alone would be enough to prove the truth of the cause given by +the wife in her affidavit—namely, that she had fled to avoid the +deadly peril in which she feared she was placed, and that she +might return to her father's hearth. The Canon also gave her his +aid and companionship out of mere pity, and her honour was +kept entirely untouched. The probabilities are always to be +very much observed in arguing about a crime, or in excluding it, +as the following hold. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Still less firmly established is the other ground for the asserted +plea of injured honour, which has been offered elsewhere by the +Accused on the basis of the asserted love-letters. These letters, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">80</a></span> +it was pretended, had been written in part by that most wretched +girl to the Canon, and in part by the Canon himself. All these, +it was claimed, had been found in the privy of the inn at Castelnuovo, +where they were said to have been cast for the purpose of +hiding them. Response was indeed then given by the Procurator +of the Poor that the identity of the handwriting was unproved +and uncertain; for the letters did not show to whom they were +directed. And these responses were indeed admitted, since no +punishment was inflicted upon Francesca, and she was simply +dismissed with the precaution of keeping her home as a prison. +And even though these letters, when we investigate their hearing, +seem to give proof of excessive goodwill, yet Francesca could +have made pretence of this for the purpose of winning over the +Canon, who was reluctant (as she herself acknowledges in her +affidavit), to afford her aid by giving her his company back to +the City in the execution of her premeditated flight. It is indeed +quite evident that the letters were prepared for this purpose. +(Summary, <a href="#procno5">No. 5.</a>) And therefore this wretched girl, who was +destitute of all aid and was placed in imminent risk of her life, +should be judged worthy of all pity, if with gentle and even with +loving words she tried to entice the Canon, whom she believed +was well suited to afford her aid. Nor can stronger proof of +violated modesty be drawn from these letters written for the purpose +of the flight than from the flight itself. Nor is it a new thing +for the most chaste of women to use similar arts sometimes for +quite permissible ends. In the sacred Scriptures we read that +Judith did so to deceive Holofernes, for the purpose of freeing +her country. This luckless girl could therefore do so without any +mark of dishonour, for the purpose of escaping deadly peril.</p> + +<p>We may speak still further of her confidence in her own continence +as well as in the integrity of the Canon. Concerning +this, a certain witness, examined by the Fisc in the said prosecution +at the instance of Count Guido, who was then present, +testifies to hearing from Gregorio Guillichini (likewise a relative +of the Accused) as follows: "Signor Gregorio then added that +the Signor Canon was going there for a good reason, and that +therefore Signora Francesca had desired to go to Rome. And +he told me also that no ill could arise from it, because there was +not the slightest sin between them." The deposition of this witness, +which is directly contrary to the party who had brought her +into court, fully proves our point as the following hold. +[Citations.] And therefore, since the luckless girl can be suspected +of no evil from her association with Canon Caponsacchi, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">81</a></span> +and since she had no other help more suitable for carrying out +her plan, her dealings with him by letter ought to be excused +as ordered to this end, even though we may read certain loving +expressions in them. The latter, indeed, should be considered +rather as courtesies adapted to winning his goodwill, and they +should always be interpreted according to the thought of the +one proffering them. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Still further, there is added the participation of the Canon +Conti, a nobleman and a relative of the Accused, who forwarded +the attempt. It is incredible that he would have been willing to +plot against the honour of Guido, but he would merely wish to +snatch that wretched girl from imminent death because of his +pity of her. And such participation is made clearly evident +from the very letters which it is pretended were written by +Caponsacchi.</p> + +<p>Of lighter weight still are the other proofs of pretended dishonesty; +[first] the approach of the Canon to the home of the +Accused at night time, for the purpose of speaking with the wife +who was slain; [secondly] the kissing on the journey to Rome, +concerning which Francesco Giovanni Rossi, driver of the carriage +(commonly called calesse) bears witness; and [third] the pretended +sleeping together in the same bed at the inn of Castelnuovo. +As regards the first of these three, there is defect of +proof; for it rests upon the word of a single witness only, Maria +Margherita Contenti, and she endures the most relevant exception +of being a public harlot, and so she alone can prove nothing. +[Citations.] And since such approaching of the house was +ordered to the permissible end of removing the wretched girl +from the imminent peril of death, by taking her back to her +father's house, it cannot be brought as a proof of illicit commerce. +For the mere possibility that it was done for this purpose +is enough to oblige us to take it in good part, according to the +text. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>This is especially so since the very witness who swears to this +approach of the home states, by hearsay from the said Gregorio +Guillichini, that it was to a good end, and that no sin was taking +place between the Canon and the wife who is now slain. And, +as Guillichini was better informed, and was indeed a friend and, +as I understand, a relative of the Accused, this excludes all suspicion +to the contrary. With this testimony another deposition +seems to agree, namely, that of the Canon Franceschini, brother +of the Accused, who when questioned as to whether he knew if +any intimacy had existed between Canon Caponsacchi and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">82</a></span> +Francesca, replied: "This we never knew of beforehand; but +after the criminal flight the whole town said that there must +surely have passed some correspondence between them." His +ignorance quite excludes and renders improbable any furtive and +illicit approach to the home by the Canon Caponsacchi. For if +the Accused had indeed threatened to kill his wife on account of +unjust suspicion of Caponsacchi, we may well believe that Guido +himself, his brother, and all the household would have kept +guard for her safe keeping with all their might. And so, the said +approach to the home, if it had been frequent (as is alleged), or +if it had been for an ill end, would have been observed by them.</p> + +<p>[Secondly] under this same defect of proof lies the pretended +kissing of each other on the journey. As to this matter only a +single witness testifies, whose excessive animus is shown by his +assertion, for he asserts that he saw this at night; nor does he +give any reason for his seeing it, such as that the moon was +shining, or that he could see because some artificial light was +dispelling the gloom. As no such reason is given, he deserves no +credence, as the following observe. [Citations.] Another very +great improbability is added thereto—namely, that while he was +driving the carriage with such velocity that it rather seemed to +fly than advance swiftly, he could not have looked back to see +such mutual kissing. This improbability likewise takes away +from him all right to belief, according to what the following +hold. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But the assertion of that most wretched girl herself is also well +suited to exclude all suspicion of her pretended unchastity. This +was made by her after she had suffered many severe wounds +in the very face of death itself, at the demand of the priests and +other persons ministering to her. For, according to their attestation, +she asserted that she had never sinned against her conjugal +faith and had always conducted herself with all chastity and +shame: "We were present and assisted at the last illness from +which Francesca Pompilia, wife of Guido Franceschini, died. +She was often asked by her confessors and other persons whether +she had committed any offence against the said Guido, her +husband, whereby she might have given him occasion to maltreat +her in such a manner as to cause her death. And she always +responded that she had never committed any offence, but had +always lived with all chastity and modesty." And Fra Celestino +Angelo of St. Anna, of the order of barefooted Augustinians, in +his testimony, bears even more exact witness to this constant +assertion of her innocence, where he writes: "She always said, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">83</a></span> +'May God pardon him in heaven, as I pardon him on earth, but +as for the sin for which they have slain me, I am utterly innocent': +in proof whereof she said that God should not pardon her that +sin, because she had never committed it." An assertion like +this, indeed, given in the very face of death, deserves all credence, +since no one is believed to lie at such a time, as the following +assert. [Citations.] Menocchius speaks in these very circumstances +of one suspected of heresy, saying that such suspicion is +removed if in the hour of death the accused say and protest +that he had lived and wished to die and to trust according to +what is pleasing to the Sacred Roman Church, etc. [Citation.] +And Decianus cites the opinion of Albericus, who declares that +by means of an assertion of this kind, made before the Cardinals, +the memory of Pope Boniface had been defended, and that this +very Albericus had in this way defended Gian Galeazzo Visconti +of Milan.</p> + +<p>And this is more especially true since all the said witnesses +agree that this most wretched girl died with the highest edification +of the bystanders, and that she had always shown the deeds +of Christian perfection, as we find in the said attestations, where +we read: "And from having seen her die the death of a saint." +And there is another statement of the said Father Celestino +Angelo, which infers the innocence of her past life from her +conduct just before death. All these matters are given in our +Summary, <a href="#procno6">No. 6</a>.</p> + +<p>But, however rightly the Accused might draw some suspicion +of his wife's dishonesty from her flight and from these letters, the +tenor of which seems to prove them love-letters (which suspicion +could excite due anger), yet this would not make excusable such +truculent vengeance, taken after so great an interval. For this +vengeance was taken, not merely upon his most wretched wife, +but also upon her parents, who were entirely off their guard and +quite undeserving of such a fate. And these murders were +attended with such grave circumstances, aggravating the crime, +that he would have to be punished with death even if he had not +confessed the murders. For although just anger because of +violated conjugal faith usually moderates the penalty for a +husband killing his adulterous wife, yet one can no longer argue +for total impunity after an opportunity to take vengeance on the +adulterer and adulteress has been thrown away. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But an especial and indispensable requisite is that the wife be +taken in adultery, according to the text. [Citation.] "For +thus it wishes this power to lie with the father, if he take his +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">84</a></span> +daughter in her very sin." Labeo also approves this, and +Pomponius writes that she may be killed when taken in very +licentiousness, and this is what Solon and Draco say. [Citations.] +Much more does this hold good in the case of a husband, whose +wrath may be kindled much more easily against a wife by sinister +and unjust suspicion conceived about her. For the husband is +not always accustomed to take good counsel for the wife, which +the law presumes that the father does by natural instinct, etc.; +and it excuses the father only when he kills his daughter along +with her defiler, or inflicts wounds unhesitatingly upon her.</p> + +<p>And this is so true that it is not enough if the wife be found +only in acts that are remote from, or merely preparatory to +adultery, as authorities commonly affirm. [Citations.] John +Teitops holds thus, and I think it well to quote his words, since +the Judges may not have him at hand, and he thus explains the +words of the said text: "Therefore they argue that acts preparatory +to adultery do not suffice, but the obscene commingling +of limbs is required." And after citing his authorities, +he adds: "And this is more clearly evident from the words of +Solon as given by Lucian, the Eunuch," where we read: "Unless +they lie who say that he was taken in adultery." And then he +criticises the opinion of Accursius, who asserts that acts preparatory +for adultery are enough. And in the second paragraph after +this decision is given he asserts that his opinion should be understood +to be concerning immediate preparations, and he so +explains his decision, where he says: "From the taking of the +adulterer alone and naked with her alone and naked, and lying +in the same bed, violent and certain suspicion of adultery arises, +wherefrom the sentence of divorce may be granted."</p> + +<p>But the laws adduced (at letters I & J) show that strong suspicion +does not indeed suffice. For this sort of discovery is the +true taking in the act of adultery. And from a civil case under +the said letter, one argues weakly for proof in a criminal cause. +For no one can be condemned, much less killed, on suspicions +alone in the absence of law. And violent suspicion is not indubitable +ground for proof, such as is required in criminal cases. +But indeed such suspicion is fallacious, because persons might +be found to act thus for the purpose of committing adultery, and +yet not actually to have committed the adultery, as Gravetta +and others say.</p> + +<p>The Accused might indeed have contended merely for the +tempering of the penalty if he had killed his fugitive wife in the +act of taking her at the inn of Castelnuovo in company with +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">85</a></span> +Canon Caponsacchi. But when he neglected to take vengeance +with his own hand and preferred to take it by law, he could not +then kill her after an interval. This is according to the text +[Citation], which affirms that one can put off the vengeance from +day to day. [Citations.] Farinacci asserts that it was so held +in practice, lest men should be given the opportunity of avenging +their own wrongs. And he confutes Bertazzolus, who places on +the same footing a case of taking in adultery, and says that the +wife may be convicted of it provided that there be no doubt of it. +Nor may the suspicion of the husband, which gave a strong +ground for the difference, be unjust or too ready. Because just +grievance, exciting a wrath which usually disturbs the mind of +the husband, is verified by the actual taking of the wife in adultery, +or in acts very near to it and not after an interval, although +his suspicion may be very strong. And so the laws which excuse +a husband because of just and sudden anger cannot be extended +to cover vengeance taken after an interval. For in the latter +case neither the impetuosity nor the suddenness of the anger is +proved, but the murder is said to be committed in cold blood. +But if for the purpose of restraining the impetus of raging anger, +lest the husband take vengeance on his own authority, he is not +excused from the penalty of the <i>Lex Cornelia de Sicariis</i>, provided +he kill his wife after an interval, how much less excusable +will he be if, after choosing the way of public vengeance by imprisoning +his wife and her pretended lover, he shall, after a long +intervening time, slaughter her and her parents so brutally?</p> + +<p>It should be added, for increasing his penalty, that as regards +the unfortunate parents there was no just cause for killing them +unless he wishes to consider as such the lawsuit which they +brought for the nullification of the dowry contract because of the +detection of her pretended birth. But this cause rather increases +the offence to the most atrocious crime of <i>læsa majestas</i>, +because of the utter security which the Pontifical Majesty wishes +to afford to all litigants in the City. This point is found in the +well-known decree of Alexander VI. where we read: "The +inhumanity and savagery which thirsts for the death of others +is horrible and detestable," and in the end we read: "In +offence of the jurisdiction of his Divine Majesty, and to the +injury of the Apostolic Authority." And, "They incur <i>ipso +facto</i> the sentence of the crime of <i>læsa majestas</i>." And a little +later: "And they may always be distrusted in all their good +deeds by every one, and may be held as banditti and as infamous +and unfit." +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">86</a></span></p> + +<p>Very worthy of consideration, also, is that other aggravation +of this inhuman slaughter, namely, that it was committed in +their own home, which ought to be for each person the safest +of refuges, according to the text. [Citations.] And Cicero +elegantly says: "What is more sacred, what is more guarded +by all religious feeling, than the home of each of our Citizens! +Here are our altars, here are our hearths, here are our household +gods, and here the sacred ceremonies of our religion are contained. +This refuge is so sacred to all that it would be base for +any one to be snatched hence." Much more is this true as +regards the wretched wife, who was held in that place as a +prison, with the approval also of the Abate Franceschini. And +hence the public safekeeping may be said to be violated thereby, +and the majesty of the Prince wounded, since the same reasoning +is observed as regards a true and formal prison, and a prison +assigned by the Prince, as the following assert. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Finally, we should also consider the aggravation of "prohibited +arms," with which the crime was committed. This of +itself demands the death penalty, even though the principal +crime should otherwise be punished more mildly, as Sanfelicius +advises, stating that it was so adjudged. [Citation.]</p> + +<p class="left45 center"> +<span class="smcap">Giovanni Battista Bottini</span>,<br /> +<i>Advocate of the Fisc and of the Apostolic Chamber.</i></p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft7" id="ft7">File-title of Pamphlet 7.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor of the<br /> +City in Criminal Cases</i>:</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For Count Guido Franceschini<br /> +and his Associates, Prisoners.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Summary.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber</i>,<br /> +1698.</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">SUMMARY</p> + +<p class="center">[<a name="pamphlet7" id="pamphlet7"></a>PAMPHLET 7.]</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">89</a></span></p> + +<p class="p2 center"><i><a name="defno1" id="defno1"></a>No. 1</i>.—<i>Letter of the Honourable Marzi-Medici, +Governor of Arezzo.</i></p> + +<p>My most Illustrious and Dearly Beloved Master:</p> + +<p>Your favoured letter of the twenty-fourth of last month has +reached me, and I am exceedingly sorry for the uneasiness in +which you hint you are placed by the maledictions which Signor +Pietro Comparini and his wife have disseminated throughout +Rome, concerning the ill-treatment they say they suffered in +your home while staying in Arezzo. As your letter questions +me for true information, I answer with all frankness, that both +among the noble connection and in Count Guido's home they +were treated with all respect and decorum. The cause of the +first disturbance which sprang up between them and your mother +and brothers was that Signora Violante, a few days after her +arrival, presumed to domineer over the house and to keep the +keys of everything, and in fact to turn out of house and home +Signora Beatrice, your mother. With good reason, neither of +the brothers was willing to consent thereto, and this gave +occasion for the first insults and domestic broils. These afterwards +increased when they saw that Signor Pietro had given +over the company and conversation of the best people of the +city, and had struck up acquaintance with the most vulgar. +And with them he began to frequent daily all the taverns here. +This cast discredit upon him, and was little for the good name +of the Franceschini. Of much greater scandal were the many +flights and petitions made by Guido's wife, their daughter, to +Monsignor the Bishop. These were made for no other reason +than that neither she nor her parents wished to stay any longer +in Arezzo, but desired to return to Rome. When she had been +rebuked by that most prudent Prelate, he always sent her home +in his carriage. It is true that ever since the Comparini left +this City until the present time the Signora has conducted +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">90</a></span> +herself with much modesty and prudence. From this fact +every one infers that the poor child was led to such excesses by +her parents, as she herself declares to everybody. Now she +detests even the memory of them. Therefore, she is getting +back into the good opinion of every one, and especially of those +ladies of the city who had ceased having anything to do with +her. Finally, these same Comparini had taken away all her +jewellery from the Signora, which I forced them to restore. +Altogether, such and so great are the scandals to which they +have given rise before the whole city in the lapse of the few +months they have stayed here, that I write you only a few of +them. I assure you that with them your brothers have had +the patience of martyrs. Accordingly when I saw that they +had become incorrigible, and were the talk of the town, and +that they might force your brothers to commit some excess +against them, for the maintenance of good discipline, I availed +myself of the authority vested in me by His Serene Highness, +and threatened them with prison and punishment unless they +behaved themselves. After these threats, which they evidently +merited and which might have overtaken them, they decided to +go to Rome, as they did a little later, leaving behind them in +this city a very bad reputation.</p> + +<p>As for the rest, there is now in your home an utter quietude, +and the Signora lives with exemplary prudence, detesting the ill +example she had shown the ladies of this city, and she confesses +freely that it was so commanded by her parents. In my judgment, +it is the hand of God that has freed your family from such +turbid heads. This is all I can here put down, out of much else +there is to say about it. Therefore rest at ease, and believe me +that the discredit has been entirely their own. I need only sign +myself, with all my heart, to your most illustrious self,</p> + +<p class="left45"> +Your most devoted and obliged servant,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="smcap">Vincenzo Marzi-Medici.</span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Arezzo</span>, <i>August 2, 1694</i>.</p> + +<p>To Signor Abate Paolo Franceschini, Rome.</p> + +<p class="center p2"><a name="defno2" id="defno2"></a>No. 2.—<i>Deposition of Francesca.</i></p> + +<p>I will tell your Excellency why I have fled from the home of +my husband. Here in Rome, three years ago, I was married by +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">91</a></span> +my father and mother to the said Franceschini, and after I was +engaged to him he stayed here in Rome for two months without +consummating the marriage. Then with my father and my +mother I was taken by my husband to Arezzo, because in the +marriage contract it was agreed that my father and mother +should go and live in Arezzo, as they did. After they had +remained there four months, they departed and returned to +Rome, because of the ill-treatment they suffered, at the hands +not only of my husband, but of the others in his house.</p> + +<p>I was left behind in Arezzo, and when about a year had passed +after the consummation of the marriage, as I did not become +pregnant my husband and my mother-in-law Beatrice began +to turn against me, because I had no children. He said that +because of me their house would die out and that he could not +hope for an heir by me after a while; for by chance he had heard +my father say, that during a girlhood sickness certain seeds had +been given to me as medicine, which possibly hindered me +from having children. For that reason I came to be continually +mistreated by my husband and mother-in-law, though I +answered that I was not to blame for that. Yet they continued +always to threaten my life, and, without any real occasion, they +sought every pretext to maltreat me.</p> + +<p>Then my husband began to be jealous of me, and forbade me to +show my face at the window. And to remove that occasion of +jealousy I never showed my face save when it was absolutely +necessary. So one day, while we were on the loggia, he said to +me that I was staying up there to make love, without telling me +with whom. I replied that these were mere pretexts, and that +from that place one could see only the street, without looking +into the windows of the houses; for the loggia was entirely on +the roof.</p> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">A.</p> +<p>She tells of her +husband's threats +because of her ardour +for her lover.</p> +</div> + +<p>And then because the Canon Caponsacchi, with other young +men of the place, used to pass before our house and stop to talk +with certain hussies, who were standing there in front, my +husband began to fume with anger at me because the said Canon +kept passing there as above, although I was not at all to blame. +His suspicion increased all the more because, while we were in a +great crowd at the play one evening, Canon Conti, the brother of +the husband of my sister-in-law, threw me some confetti. My +husband, who was near me, took offence at it—not against Conti, +but against Caponsacchi, who was sitting by the side of the said +Conti. Then because Conti frequented our house, as a relative, +my husband took offence at him likewise; and this so much so +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">92</a></span> +that I, being aware of it, retired to my room whenever he came +to our house, that I might not have to take even more trouble; +but my husband was not thereby appeased, +but said that I did this as a trick, and that +his suspicions of me were not removed. +He began anew to torment me so, on +account of Caponsacchi, that I was reduced +to desperation and did not know what to +say. Then to remove that occasion for his +ill-treatment, I spoke to the said Caponsacchi one +day as he was passing our house and begged him not to pass that way, that he +might relieve me from all the distresses I suffered at the hands +of my husband on that account. He replied that he did not +know whence my husband had drawn such a suspicion, as he used +to pass along there on other affairs, and that, in short, Guido +could not stop his passing along the street. And although he +promised me not to pass along there, he continued to do so. But +I did not show my face at the window. Yet with all this my +husband was not appeased, but continued to maltreat me and +to threaten my life, and he said that he wished to kill me.</p> + +<p>At the time of the affair of the play told above, as soon as we +had returned home, he pointed a pistol at my breast saying: +"Oh, Christ! What hinders me from laying you out here? +Let Caponsacchi look to it well, if you do not wish me to do so, +and to kill you."</p> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">B.</p> + +<p>She died asserting +that she did not +know how to write.</p> +</div> + +<p>Furthermore at the beginning of these troubles, I went twice +to Monsignor the Bishop, because he might have remedied it in +some way; but this did no good, because of his relation with the +house of my husband. And so as I was a stranger in that city +and did not know how to free myself from these perils and abuses, +and as I feared that if Guido did not slay me with weapons he +might poison me, I planned to run away and go back to Rome to +my father and mother. But as I did not know how to accomplish +this, I went about a month later to confession to an Augustinian +Father, whom they call Romano. I told +him all my distresses, imploring him to +write to my father in my name, as I do +not know how to write, and to tell him +that I was desperate, and must part from +my husband and go to him in Rome. +But I had no response.</p> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">C.</p> + +<p>She confesses the +strength and audacity +of her lover.</p> +</div> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">D.</p> + +<p>She confesses a +conversation with her +lover.</p> +</div> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">E.</p> + +<p>She confesses a new +conversation with her +lover.</p> +</div> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">F.</p> + +<p>The lie about the +arrival at Castelnuovo.</p> +</div> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">G.</p> + +<p>The lover is not +a relative of her +husband.</p></div> + +<p>Therefore, not knowing to whom I might turn to accomplish +my desire, and thinking that no one in the place would assist +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">93</a></span> +me, because of their relationship or friendship to my husband, +I finally resolved to speak of it to the said Caponsacchi, because +I had heard said that he was a resolute man. +Accordingly, as he was passing one +day before our house, at a time when my +husband was out of the city, I called him +and spoke to him from the stairs. I told +him of the peril in which I found myself on +his account, and begged him to bring me +here to Rome, to my father and mother. +He replied, however, that he did not wish +to meddle at all in such an affair, as it +would be thought ill of by the whole city, +and all the more so as he was a friend of the house of my husband. +But I implored him so much and told him it was the duty of a +Christian to free from death a poor foreign woman. At last I +induced him to promise me that he would accompany me as +above. Then he told me he would secure the carriage, and +when that had been arranged he would give me a signal by +letting his handkerchief fall in passing before our house, as he +had done before. But the next day went by, and although I +stood at the blinds, he did not give the signal. When the day +following had also passed, I spoke to him again as above, and +complained to him that he had broken the +word he had given me. And he excused +himself, saying that he had not found a +carriage in Arezzo. I answered him that, +at any rate, he should have procured one +from outside, as he had promised to do. +Then the last Sunday of the past month, he went by our house +again and made the signal with the handkerchief, as he had +promised. And so I went to bed with my husband that evening, +and when I had assured myself that he was asleep I arose from +bed and clothed myself. I took some little things of my own, a +little box with many trifles inside, and some money, I know not +how much there was, from the strong-box. These were, moreover, +my own, as is evident from the list of things and moneys +made by the treasurer of Castelnuovo. Then I went downstairs +at dawn, where I found Caponsacchi, and we went together to +the Porta San Spirito. Outside of it stood a carriage with two +horses and a driver, and when we had both entered the carriage +we journeyed toward Rome, travelling night and day without +stopping until we reached Castelnuovo, except for them to +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">94</a></span> +take refreshment and to change the horses. We arrived at +dawn, and were there overtaken by my +husband as I have told heretofore to +your Honour. The said Caponsacchi is +not related in any degree to my husband, +but was certainly a friend.</p> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">H.</p> + +<p>New lies, that she +did not receive letters +from her lover, +and that she does +not know how to +write.</p></div> + +<p>The said Caponsacchi, before the said +affair, did not send me any letter, because +I do not know how to read manuscript, and +do not know how to write.</p> + +<p>Before the said affair, I did not at all send a letter of any sort +to the said Caponsacchi.</p> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">I.</p> + +<p>Another lie, that +she did not send +letters to her lover.</p></div> + +<div class="sidenote"> +<p class="center">K.</p> + +<p>She does not know +how to write, and +her husband had +traced the letter.</p></div> + +<p>When again put under oath, she +responded: While I was in Arezzo, I +wrote at the instance of my husband to +Abate Franceschini, my brother-in-law +here in Rome. But as I did not know +how to write, my husband wrote the letter +with a pencil and then made me trace it +with a pen and ink it. And he told me +that his brother had much pleasure in +receiving such a letter of mine, which had +been written with my own hand. And +he did this two or three times.</p> + +<p>If your Honour should cause me to see one of the letters +written by me as above, and sent to Abate Franceschini, I +should clearly recognise it.</p> + +<p>And when it was shown, etc., she responded: "I have seen +and carefully examined the letter shown me by the order of +your Honour, which begins—<i>Carissimo Sig. Cognato, sono con +questa</i>—and ends <i>Francesca Comparini ne Franceschini</i>, and +having examined it, it seems to me, but I cannot swear to it +as the truth, that it is one of the letters written by me to Abate +Franceschini, my brother-in-law, in conformity to my husband's +wishes, etc.</p> + +<div class="sidenote"><p class="center">L.</p> + +<p>Another lie about +the arrival at the +tavern of Castelnuovo.</p></div> + +<p>And after a few intervening matters, etc., when questioned, +etc., she replied: "I have never sent +letters of any sort by the said Maria to +any one."</p> + +<p>In all truth, I arrived at Castelnuovo at +the blush of dawn.</p> + +<p>We shut ourselves in there at the tavern of Castelnuovo for +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">95</a></span> +the space of more than an hour. During that time we stayed +in a room upstairs.</p> + +<div class="sidenote"><p class="center">M.</p> + +<p>New lies that she +did not lie down to +sleep at the Inn of +Castelnuovo.</p></div> + +<p>And after a few other matters, when +questioned, she replied: "I did not go +to sleep, nor lie down to rest in the tavern +at Castelnuovo during the time I stopped +there, as above."</p> + +<p>I know that your Honour tells me that the authorities pretend +further that I slept all night in the abovesaid tavern of +Castelnuovo in an upstairs room, in which Canon Caponsacchi +also slept. And I say and respond that no one can truly say +so, because I did not rest at all in the said tavern, and stopped +there only for the time stated above.</p> + +<p class="p2">[The <a name="defno3" id="defno3"></a>letter of Pompilia to Abate Franceschini occurs both +here and in the summary of the Defence. It is translated +on pp. <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>.]</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><a name="defno4" id="defno4"></a>No. 4.—<i>A letter of Francesca written to Abate Franceschini.</i></p> + +<p>Outside: To Abate Paolo Franceschini, Rome; but inside:</p> + +<p>My very dear Sir and Brother:</p> + +<p>I have received the fan which you sent, which has been most +welcome to me. I accept it with pleasure and thank you for it. +It displeases me that, without reason, my parents wound the +honour of our house. I for my part am well and am happy in +not having them now to stir me to evil. I wish well to all our +house, in the sacred fear of God. In fact you may well laugh at +the maledictions of my parents. Command me, who reverence +you from the bottom of my heart.</p> + +<p class="left45"> +Your deeply obliged servant and sister-in-law,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="smcap">Francesca Comparini Franceschini</span>.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Arezzo</span>, <i>July 19, 1694</i>.</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><a name="defno5" id="defno5"></a>No. 5.—<i>The examination of Canon Caponsacchi.</i></p> + +<p>I had to go to Rome on my own business, and as I told my +secret to Giovanni Battista Conti, a relative of Franceschini, who +frequented the home of the latter, Francesca might have learned +about it from the same Canon, although there was talk about +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">96</a></span> +town of my coming to Rome, which was to follow soon. Hence +a letter, sent to me by the said Francesca, was brought one day +by a certain Maria, then a servant of the Franceschini. In it +she told me that she had heard of my going to Rome, and that, +as her husband wished to kill her, she had resolved to go to Rome +to her father; and not knowing with whom she might intrust +herself, she asked me to do her the service of accompanying her +as above. I answered her that I was unwilling to do anything of +that kind, or to expose myself to such a risk; and I sent her a +reply by the same servant. I do not remember the precise time +that she sent me the above letter. Thereafter, when I passed +the house, she continued making the same request to me, by +flinging from time to time from the window a note that repeated +the request. And I replied to her, sending the response by the +same servant, and telling her that I did not care to involve +myself in such affairs. And therefore she finally cast me another +note from the window, which, as I learned, was seen by a working-woman +living across the street, whose name I do not know, and +she carried it to the husband. The same servant was then commissioned +to tell me that there had been a great commotion in +the house because of it, and that the sister of Guido, who had +been married into the house of Conti, had declared furthermore +that that servant had carried the letter to me. She also told me +that Guido said he was going to kill his wife in some way after a +little while, and that he would also be avenged on me. Accordingly, +with this purpose, to free myself from every difficulty and +danger, and also to save from death the said Francesca, I resolved +to leave for Rome and to accompany her thither, conducting her +to her father. And so one evening—I do not remember the +exact time—as I was passing their house I gave her a letter, +which she drew up to the window with a string. In it I told her +that to free her from death I would accompany her as above. +Another evening she threw to me from the window a letter in +which she renewed the above insistence, declaring to me that her +husband was always threatening to kill her; she would therefore +have to receive the favour of my company as above, of which I +had spoken. And finally, the last Sunday of the past month of +April, while I was going by their house and she was standing at +the window, I told her that I had secured the carriage for early +the following morning, and that I would have it await her at the +gate of San Clemente. Accordingly, at about one o'clock in the +morning, she came alone to the said gate. We entered the +carriage and turned along outside of the city wall to go to the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">97</a></span> +gate of San Spirito, which is in the direction of Perugia. This +carriage belonged to Agostino, tavern-keeper in Arezzo, and a +driver, surnamed Venarino, the servant of the said Agostino, +drove it. I had had him leave the city Sunday evening at the +Ave Maria. Then we pursued our journey without stopping to +spend the night anywhere, and we paused only as it was necessary +for refreshing ourselves and changing horses, until we reached +Castelnuovo on Tuesday evening, the last day of the said month +of April. Then because Francesca said that she was suffering +some pain, and that she did not have the fortitude to pursue the +journey further without rest, she cast herself, still clothed, upon +a bed in a chamber there, and I, likewise clothed, placed myself +on another bed in the same chamber. I told the host to call us +after three or four hours, for resuming our journey. But he did +not call us, and the husband of the said Francesca arrived in the +meantime, and had both of us arrested by the authorities, and +from there we were taken to Rome.</p> + +<p>I have not spoken in Arezzo to Francesca at other times than +those I have recounted above to yourselves.</p> + +<div class="sidenote"><p class="center">E.</p> + +<p>The lover is not +related to Count +Guido.</p></div> + +<p>The husband of the said Francesca is not related to me in +any degree whatsoever.</p> + +<p>I have no profession at all, but am a +Canon of the Pieve, of Santa Maria of +Arezzo, and am merely a subdeacon.</p> + +<p>When I was imprisoned at Castelnuovo +certain moneys, rings, and other matters were found, of which +a memorandum was made by the authorities.</p> + +<p>I have never written any letter to the said Francesca, except as +stated by me above.</p> + +<p>The letters sent to me as above by the said Francesca were +burned by me in Arezzo.</p> + +<p>Although in the prison of Castelnuovo, where I was placed, a +diligent search was made by the authorities and also by the +husband of the said Francesca, nothing at all was found there.</p> + +<p>The said Francesca when leaving Arezzo carried with her a +bundle of her own clothing and a box, in which she said there +were some trinkets, but I did not see them. And she had it in a +handkerchief with certain coins, which were then described at +Castelnuovo by the Treasurer.</p> + +<p>I do not know precisely by whom the letters sent to me by the +said Francesca were written, but I suppose that they may have +been written by her, but I do not know whether she knows how +to write. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">98</a></span></p> + +<p>In the chamber of the inn at Castelnuovo where we stopped, +as I said in my other examination, there were two beds. Only +one of these was provided with sheets by the servant of the +tavern, that it might serve for Signora Francesca. I did not +have sheets placed on the other, because I did not care to undress +myself. Nor did she undress herself, as I said in my other +examination.</p> + +<p>If I should see one of the letters written by me to Signora +Francesca, I would know it very well.</p> + +<p>I have seen and I do see very carefully these two letters which +have been offered as evidence in this suit and have been shown +to me by the order of your Honour. One of them begins +<i>Adorata mia Signora, vorrei sapere</i>, etc., and ends <i>mi ha detto il +Conti</i>. Having well considered this letter, I declare that it was +not written by me, though the handwriting of the same has some +resemblance to my own. I have also seen the other letter, which +begins <i>Amatissima mia, Signora, Ricevo</i>, etc., and ends <i>questa +mia</i>, and having well examined it I say that the same was not at +all written by me, and is not in my handwriting. Furthermore, +it has not the slightest resemblance to my handwriting.</p> + +<p>I have never spoken in Arezzo to Signora Francesca, except +when I spoke to her at the window, as I said in my other examination.</p> + +<p>I have never received other letters from the said Signora +Francesca concerning other matters than her flight to Rome, as +I have said in my other examinations.</p> + +<p>I marvel that the Fisc pretends that, before the flight, several +other love-letters had been sent to me by the said Signora Francesca; +for she was a modest young woman and such actions +would be out of keeping with her station and her birth. And +therefore I declare that the abovesaid pretence is false and without +foundation.</p> + +<p>I turn back to say to your Honour that in the prison of +Castelnuovo there was not found by the authorities anything +whatsoever. And if your honour tells me that certain love-letters +were found, which the Fisc pretends are those sent me by +Signora Francesca, I say and respond that it is not at all true. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">99</a></span></p> + +<p class="center p2"><a name="defno6" id="defno6"></a>No. 6.—<i>Letter of the Most Reverend Bishop of Arezzo.</i></p> + +<p>Outside: To the Most Illustrious and Most Respected Signor +Paolo Franceschini, Rome.</p> + +<p class="p2">And inside:</p> + +<p>My Most Illustrious and Respected Signor:</p> + +<p>I understand why you desire to tell me about the quarrels +which have arisen between Signor Guido, your brother, and +Signor Comparini. And I cannot but pity you for the trouble +you have had in a case so rare, and indeed so unprecedented. +The Signora, your sister-in-law, had some recourse to me, but +her great excitement, taken along with the excessive passion of +her mother, revealed to me that the daughter had taken this +step entirely by instigation. So I tried to make peace between +them, thinking that when the instigations of the parents were +removed she might be brought to right reason. I believed this +the more readily, as she was of tender age. And the more she +spoke, and the more she made outcry, that much the more had +she been urged thereto by the instigation of her mother. And +that she might not be excited even more, I had her taken home in +my carriage twice. I have some knowledge of this because +Signor Senator Marzi-Medici, who presides over the laic government +of this town for our Most Serene Grand Duke, has told me +all. And I need only add that I reaffirm what I have written +with entire sincerity. Wishing for new chances to serve you, I +affirm myself to you, Sir,</p> + +<p class="left45 center"> +Your Most Obedient Servant,<br /> +<span class="smcap">The Right Reverend Bishop of Arezzo</span>.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Arezzo</span>, <i>September 15, 1694</i>.</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><a name="defno7" id="defno7"></a>No. 7.—<i>Reciprocal love-letters.</i></p> + +<p>My dear Sir:</p> + +<p>I do not multiply my assertions for the purpose of proving +my love to you, because my resolution and your desert is enough +proof of it. My affection no longer has any rein, etc. May +grace be to him who gives grace.</p> + +<p class="p2">My own Signor:</p> + +<p>I tell you, do not be surprised if my mother was at the window, +because she was looking at the one who was setting the sofa in +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">100</a></span> +order. And therefore you can pass here without fear. When +more at my leisure, I will write you some fine matters, etc. +When they tell me anything, I will advise you of it.</p> + +<p class="p2">My Adored Mirtillo, My own Life:</p> + +<p>I pray you pardon me that I did not look at you yesterday +when I was at the Cappucchini, because I saw that the two were +watching to see if I would look at you. Therefore I suffered +much pain in not being able to look at my Sun. But I saw +mine own with my heart, in which I have you engraved. I +remain as I am and shall be</p> + +<p class="left45">Your devoted servant and faithful sweetheart,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="smcap">Amarillis</span>.</p> + +<p class="p2">My well-beloved:</p> + +<p>I have received your letter, which has given me much pain, +etc., that the Jealous One might have seen the letters. And he +did see them, but did not open them, because they were tied up +together, and he supposed that they were other letters, and did +not take them into his hand. This fellow is telling it because +he would like you to get angry with me, etc. You ask me if I +am of the same thought, and I tell you yes. If you have not +changed, I am ready to do what I have told you, etc. Then +soon, if they continue to drink red wine, I will tell you so. +Whether you are of the same mind still, or have repented of it, +I am content to do what you wish, etc. I remain as I have been</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Your Faithful Sweetheart.</span></p> + +<p class="p2">Most beloved Signor:</p> + +<p>I do not know why you did not pass here yesterday evening; +for I took my stand at the window and saw no one. I forsook +the window because the Canon, my brother, was there. I left +there to go to the other windows lest he might see me, etc. But +you turned toward the door of your sweetheart, because there is +the one adored by you. Conti has asked me for those octaves, +which you gave me, etc. Therefore tell me if I must give them +to him or still keep the precious verses for myself. And I +remain as I am and shall be</p> + +<p class="left35"> +Your faithful, yes, your most faithful Sweetheart,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="smcap">Amarillis</span>.</p> + +<p>I forgot to tell you that the Signora my mother no longer has +the fever, and is drinking wine, but by herself. Her wine, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">101</a></span> +however, is red like ours. Therefore tell me what to do, that I +may do it. I close with sending you a million kisses. But I +know that in this way they are not so dear as a few would be if +you would give them to me. But those of the Signora are very +dear to you, though I tell you that they are poisoned, etc. Be +the scrupulous one with others that you have been with me. +For you have reason for this with others, but you have no +occasion for it with me, etc.</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Cherished Narcissus:</p> + +<p>This evening I received your letter, and it gives me great +comfort to know that you are not angry, etc. I do not know +when he will give it to me, but if he gives it to me I will give it +to you. The Jealous One is away, but I shall still be here, and +all the rest; but because my mother has not found a servant, +etc., they have said that they will stay here a while. Therefore +you will not pass [?] out of my mind because of my not seeing +you for a while. But whoever loves from so good a heart as I +do, will keep one in mind. I pray you pardon me if I make +myself tedious by writing too often. Acknowledging myself as +I am, I remain</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Your devoted Servant and most faithful Sweetheart.</span></p> + +<p class="p2">Most beloved Signor:</p> + +<p>If you could imagine with what haste I have written to you +these two verses, etc. I met Signor Doctor, as usual. He +asked me where I was going, and along the street, he asked me +why I had written scornfully to him. I told him that he +deserved even worse, because he had given evil deeds and good +words; for he had said he was fond of me and that he wished +him and the rest of them in Sovara, etc. He replied it did not +come from this one, but on account of another gentleman whom +I used to like, who was more gallant than he. I answered him +that if that one was not more gallant than himself, he was at +least more faithful, etc. Professing myself, as I have ever been +faithful, etc.</p> + +<p class="p2">My Adored and Revered Signor:</p> + +<p>I wish by this letter of mine to excuse myself from my error +in sealing the letter which I sent to Rome, etc. I tell you that +they have not found any letter at all of mine, because I do not +let them lie around the house, but give them to the flames. +And while I keep them, I place them in my bosom. This is not +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">102</a></span> +an excuse, why you should surmise [it to be] one of my letters; +for I tell you that I give it place in my bosom, etc. Inasmuch +as one of the family may be behind the curtain, as I believe, do +not make any signal when you are under the windows. I shall +be at the window this evening, or else at the blinds, and when +I shall see you I will show myself at the window. But it is +necessary to be prudent, that he may not see me. Because he +has told me that if he sees me he will wish to do such things +as not even Æneas, the Trojan, did. To avoid arousing his +suspicion I will not stay there. But I pledge myself</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Your Most Devoted Servant</span>.</p> + +<p class="p2">My Longed-for Blessing:</p> + +<p>If your saying that I do not love you, because you do not +know me, is not an error, it is at least displeasing to me. Hear +me, my dear: I am offended with you, because either you +consider me blind or you do not consider me amiable. You +cannot say of a truth that I do not love you, nor can you say +truly that any one does love as much as I love you. Look into +my eyes, and you will be astonished; for when bright with my +tears they will be faithful mirrors to reveal to you that your face +is copied there (in which an outline of it is made in the Sun), +that your whiteness is snow in comparison with the Milky Way, +that the Graces have directed your movements by their own +hand, that Venus in fashioning you took the measure of your +limbs with her own girdle. Ah yes, I love you so much that in +one respect I would wish alone to love you in the world, because +it seems to me that I could love you all in central Latium. I +should like that all might love you, because you would see that +all of them put together cannot love you as much as I alone do. +My breast is envied by every other part of me, because it alone +is able to love you. These are matters one cannot know by +mere hearing; they are matters to render one excusable to any +one else who does not believe it. But you are a cruel beauty; +for if you see a face composed by the miracles of angels you +should not consider it a lie if a heart is found fashioned by the +miracles of love, etc. I leave you a thousand thousand kisses.</p> + +<p class="p2">My well-beloved:</p> + +<p>I pass by compliments, because I cannot match your very +gallant verses, which are so far different from what I merit. You +tell me that you wish to know what has happened in our house. +I tell you that nothing has happened, so far as I can see, because +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">103</a></span> +none of them have said anything to me—none of them. But +Signor Guido seems rather well disposed toward me than otherwise, +and therefore I cannot find out whether they are angry +with me. Let my brother-in-law lock the door; he does it often, +etc. If you do not wish to pass by here any more, I leave that to +your own judgment, and I will suffer quietly the pains which are +pleasing to you. Therefore I tell you that you may do as you +wish. For as gold is refined in the fire, so love is refined by +suffering. I can well say that I shall suffer pain at not seeing +you as I have been accustomed, etc. With a loving kiss, I +remain as I have ever been, your most sincere sweetheart and +your most faithful slave.</p> + +<p>I had quite forgotten to tell you that I stay in the same room +as at first, and that Thursday evening I went to bed at eight +o'clock, and so you did not hear me enter the room. I told the +servant that she should make the signals agreed upon, etc.</p> + +<p>Signor Guido returns Saturday morning and you may pass this +evening at ten o'clock or sooner, when you shall see the light in +the room, etc.</p> + +<p class="p2">My well-beloved:</p> + +<p>I received your letter, which was most pleasing to me, as are +all the rest you have sent me, etc. I see that you like the Pastor +Fido. But I would wish you to imitate him, and I will imitate +another Vienna. I hear from her that you will want to come to +see me at the Villa, etc. If I could only bring it about, I would +more willingly be your wife than your servant. You tell me that +Conti is unwilling to bring any more letters for you. But let me +inform you that I am wheedling him, and I have the wits to +bring it about that he will carry them to you; because I say two +kind words to him and he is charmed and will do what I wish. +You tell me that I shall let a cord down through the lattice, but +you do not tell me what evening, etc. But I tell you that the +Jealous One had gone to Sovara, if I might speak to you. But +the Confessor is utterly unwilling, and for that reason I do not +have you come here, because now the street door is no longer +opened, but you might be able to open the back door, etc. But +that Fate does not wish it, and you do not. I thank you for the +kisses you send me, but if you yourself could give them to me, +I would hold them dear. And I give you others in reply, as +many millions as you have given to me.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Your Most Faithful Sweetheart.</span> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">104</a></span></p> + +<p>I do not know what name to give myself, whether Vienna, or +Amarillis, or Dorinda, or Lilla, but I wish to call myself Ariadne, +for I believe I have had to be such. I wish to call myself such, only +so you are not a Theseus, but a chaste Joseph, or a dear Narcissus, +or an Ilago, or a Fedone. Adonis indeed took pity on Venus, +but I am none such, but even a Medusa. Therefore I deserve, +etc. If you have read Tasso, you will know who this was, etc.</p> + +<p class="p2">My Beloved Idol:</p> + +<p>I know of the affairs which have happened to you. I do not +take it in bad part when you tell me that it is not possible to +make my mother sleep, while she is ill and drinks no wine, and +therefore cannot sleep. It may be in the next few days that she +will get well. Then I will inform you of it, etc.</p> + +<p class="left45"> +Your faithful Sweetheart,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="smcap">Amarillis</span>.</p> + +<p class="p2">My Adored, Beloved, and Revered Heart:</p> + +<p>I am confused at such praise, etc. You write to me oftener +than you might about the Doctor. You offend me by saying +that I will love him again. I tell you as sure as the Sun shall +rise upon this world, I have not the heart for another such blow. +But he who does ill, thinks ill, etc. As to what you wish to know +about the wine, I tell you that it is red now, but I do not know +how much longer it will be so, but I will let you know about it. +Sending you a thousand and a thousand, and a million of kisses, +I remain, etc.</p> + +<p>Come this evening at seven o'clock, because I wish to speak to +you, and cough when you are under the window.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Amarillis.</span></p> + +<p>She is bursting because she cannot say, as you tell me here, +that she is white as milk, and that you are darker than I. If I +had been you, I might have called you ivory, as I do call you. +Watch this evening lest it be the Jealous One, and not myself. +Therefore I will cough, and if you do not hear me cough, do not +move.</p> + +<p>I let you know that Signor Guido is going out of the city, and +will be gone several days. Therefore I pray you come this evening +about seven o'clock. And when you are under the window +cough and wait a little while, that I may not make a mistake. +He goes away Monday morning, etc. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">105</a></span></p> + +<p class="p2">My dearest and Most Deserving Well-beloved:</p> + +<p>I give the infinite thanks of Rosalinda, etc. I wish you to +know that he makes me signals along the Via del Poggio, etc., +and not because I wish to make proof of your love, which I know +very well. You are as constant as myself, and therefore I do not +wish to make these proofs, etc. So that you cannot say that I +no longer love you, because all my good wishes for Signor Guido +are turned to you, who deserve it.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Amarillis.</span></p> + +<p class="p2 center"><i>Letter of the Lover.</i></p> + +<p>My adored Signora:</p> + +<p>I wish to know whether you can leave Sunday evening, that is, +to-morrow evening, for if you do not go away to-morrow evening, +God knows when you shall be able to do so, because of the +scarcity of carriages, owing to the fact that on Wednesday the +Bishop departs with three carriages. Therefore, if you can go, +as soon as you have read this letter of mine, return to the window +and throw it to me as a sign that I may reserve a carriage beforehand, +which may be secured from some one or other. If I secure +the carriage to-morrow, in passing along there I will let fall +my handkerchief one time only. Then for the rest, to-morrow +evening I will wait from eight o'clock in the evening on as long +as necessary. And as soon as you see that they are sound +asleep, open the door for me, that I may help you make up your +bundles and collect the money. Above all, try to put some into +all their cups, and do not yourself drink it. And if by ill luck +they shall find it out, and shall threaten you with death, open +indeed the door, that I may die with you or free you from their +hands. And praying God that he will make this design of ours +turn out well, I declare myself as ever.</p> + +<p class="left45"> +Your Most Faithful Servant and Lover,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="smcap">Mirtillo</span>.</p> + +<p>It is a very bad sign that the Jealous One seems pacified, and +that he has said you were at the window. Because he will wish +to find out in that way what you are doing at the window, and +for what purpose you are there. For Conti has told me that +now he is more jealous than at first, and that if he find out about +anything, he will wish to avenge himself by putting us to death. +He wishes to do the same to me, and that is what will happen. +Here then has come at last the breaking of the chord. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">106</a></span></p> + +<p class="p2">Most Beloved Signora:</p> + +<p>I have received your note full of those expressions (and then +loving words follow). Be pleased to receive me into your +bosom, in which I rest all my affections, etc. Consign to the +ashes this note of mine.</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><i>Another letter of Francesca.</i></p> + +<p>My Revered Signor:</p> + +<p>Driven by the affection which I feel for you, I am forced to +contradict what I sent you yesterday evening in that letter +when I said I did not wish to tell you to come here. If you did +not tell me then, I tell you now that I would wish you to come +here this evening at the same hour as day before yesterday +evening. I have indeed thought that towers are not moved by +such light blows. But if you do [not?] wish to come here (that +there may be no occasion for you to break your promise to some +beloved lady or even though it may not be convenient), I do +not wish to be the cause. Therefore if you wish to come here, +pass along as soon as you have read this, etc.</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><a name="defno8" id="defno8"></a>No. 8.—<i>Decree of banishment of the lover.</i></p> + +<p class="right"> +<i>Tuesday, September 24, 1697.</i></p> + +<p>Joseph Maria Caponsacchi, of Arezzo, for complicity in flight +and running away of Francesca Comparini, and for carnal +knowledge of the same, has been banished for three years to +Civita Vecchia. +</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft8" id="ft8">File-title of Pamphlet 8.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor of the<br /> +City in Criminal Cases:</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For Count Guido Franceschini and his Associates,<br /> +Prisoners, against the Fisc.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>New Memorial of the fact and law,<br /> +together with a summary,<br /> +by the Honourable Procurator of the Poor.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA HOMICIDIORUM<a name="pamphlet8" id="pamphlet8"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">109</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 8.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and most Reverend Lord Governor:</p> + +<p>The confession of Count Guido and his fellows as to the +murder of Francesca, his wife, and of Pietro and Violante +Comparini, his father-in-law and mother-in-law, falls far short +of supporting the Fisc in demanding the ordinary death penalty. +But, rather, it is remarkably in our favour in excluding that +penalty. For there is no longer any doubt as to the cause of +the murders, namely <i>causa honoris</i>. This at first was denied +by the Fisc because of the presence of other causes, though +these either were insufficient or were indirectly hurtful to the +sense of honour. We will go over them hereafter, not "with +unwashed hands." For a confession indeed should be received +along with all its details, and is not to be divided according to a +preconceived purpose. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>This cause alone would be ground enough for demanding that +he and his fellows be dealt with more mildly, if we bear in mind +that <i>causa honoris</i> is quite sufficient for the moderating of this +penalty. For we have proved in our other argument that a +husband may kill his adulterous wife, even after an interval, +without incurring the death penalty, wherever the adultery is +really proved, as the Advocate of the Fisc concedes in his +response. § <i>Solamque suspicionem</i>.</p> + +<p>And in very truth, we have in our other plea adduced a great +many decisions of the highest courts, wherefrom it is evident +that the penalty has been diminished for husbands who have +had their wives killed even by means of an assassin; and, on the +contrary, no decision favourable to the Fisc is cited. Such an +opinion is therefore to be accepted more readily, inasmuch as it +is sanctioned by the greater number of authorities. And even +although Farinacci and Rainaldi seem to take the other side, +yet Farinacci, in his <i>Questions</i>, shows himself very much in +doubt, as I have shown in my other plea; and in <i>cons. 141</i>, he +shows that he is very changeable, since in <i>cons. 66, No. 5</i>, he has +proved the contrary. Therefore, when his attention was called +to this changeableness, in excusing himself, he asserted, in the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">110</a></span> +said <i>cons. 141</i>, under <i>No. 16</i>, that Beatrice, in behalf of whom +he had written in <i>cons. 66</i>, had been beheaded; as if this kind +of rigorous sentence should be followed in practice. And may +this distinguished authority pardon me, but he responds inconsistently, +having forgotten what he had written in the end +of <i>cons. 66</i>: that is, that Beatrice was put to death not because +she, after an interval, had commanded that one be put to death +who was plotting against her honour, but because she did not +prove her right to this latter exception, where he says: "So +also there was strong hope for the sister Beatrice, if she had +proved the excuse she offered, as she did not prove it."</p> + +<p>But the Honourable Rainaldi, whose words and writings I +venerate, in his <i>Observationes Criminales</i> (<i>cap. 2</i>, § 4, <i>No. 156</i>), +after he asserts that some remission from the ordinary penalty +may be hoped through the benignity of the Prince, does not +decide the point by citing Gizzarellus and Giurba, who affirm +that in justice the penalty should be decreased. But he goes +back to what he had written (<i>cap. 7 in Rubrica sub No. 60</i>), +where, however, he does not openly examine the point as to +murder permitted for honour's sake. Otherwise he would go +contrary to the general opinion of authorities, and to many +decisions of the highest magistrates, that is to the common +practice of the courts. [Citation.] "And this opinion is +followed in practice, as I find in the event of such a fact the +Neapolitan court has so decided." And concerning this same +practice, Matthæus likewise bears witness. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Yet, as I have said, it would be enough to clear Guido of +conviction if only his confession be taken in its entirety without +subdivision. For greater completeness, however, we offer full +proofs of the adultery, as brought out in the prosecution for the +flight from home. The Fisc has attempted to attack these +proofs lest he might have to lay down his arms; and the +Achilles of his pretence is solely a preposterous cross-examination, +which was not admitted into the suit for permanent record. +It gives the word of a certain baseborn woman, formerly a +servant in the home of the Accused, who was severely maltreated +by Guido, by the Canon his brother, and by their mother. All +too eagerly she narrates the ill-treatment suffered by Pietro and +Violante, and by Francesca their daughter, and his wife, respectively, +especially in the matter of their food, on account +of which Pietro and Violante preferred to return to Rome.</p> + +<p>Yet Guido by a written agreement had bound himself to +furnish food to the abovesaid couple. And furthermore it is +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">111</a></span> +claimed that the flight of Pompilia also was necessary, because +she was being threatened with death; in order that her own +base desire of violating her matrimonial fidelity may not be +deduced therefrom.</p> + +<p>If, however, we have any regard for the truth, the domestic +affairs of the Accused were not so pinched, because they were +more than enough, not merely for frugal, but even for lavish +living. The theft of the moneys committed by Francesca in +the act of flight demonstrates this. (See the prosecution for +flight, pages 5, 63, and 92.)</p> + +<p>The real and true cause which moved Pietro and his wife to go +back to Rome was undoubtedly that the mother of Count Guido +could not bear that the aforesaid Comparini should regulate +family matters and should at their own pleasure dispose of everything +looking toward the government of the home; this with +greatest flagrancy and with none the less boldness they desired +to do. Furthermore, Pietro took it ill that he was rebuked for +leaving the company of the noble class and associating in taverns +with the commonest persons in town, to the scandal of well-born +men. And still more because he was compelled by the Governor of +the City, under fear of imprisonment, to restore certain trinkets +and gems of his daughter, which he had taken away, as Count +Guido testified in his examination (pp. 96 and 97). And this is +admirably proved by a letter of the same Governor recently +presented by ourselves, which we give in Summary, <a href="#defno1">No. 1</a>.</p> + +<p>With these statements the cross-examination of the same +Francesca, when arrested in her flight, agrees; in it we nowhere +read that she was maltreated, nor that she ever complained of +that home of decent poverty. And yet it is very probable that, +to put a good face upon her flight, she would have alleged the +domestic want and home miseries, if she had ever suffered them.</p> + +<p>We do not deny that disputes immediately arose between +Francesca and her husband, and possibly he threatened her with +death. But this was for another reason, namely that she should +quit the illicit amours she had begun at the suggestion of +her parents, and that she should live with evident chastity as +is to be read expressly in her deposition (our Summary, <a href="#defno2">No. 2</a>, +letter A).</p> + +<p>It is verified from the fact that Francesca herself, in a letter +written to Abate Franceschini, ingenuously confesses (Summary +of the Fisc, <a href="#procno4">No. 4</a>, and our Summary, <a href="#defno3">No. 3</a>) that her parents +indeed were sowing strife between the couple, and were urging +her to have recourse to the Bishop under the false pretence of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">112</a></span> +ill-treatment; and day and night they kept instigating her to +poison her husband, her brother, and mother-in-law, to burn +the house, and what is still more awful, to win a lover and +return to Rome in his company. Nor did she fail to obey them +in several of these matters.</p> + +<p>And in another letter written to the same Abate, and shown +by us, and given in our Summary, <a href="#defno4">No. 4</a>, we read: "Not now +having those here who urge me to evil."</p> + +<p>Of no counter-effect is the response that the single characters +of the said first letter had been previously marked out by Guido, +and were afterward traced with a pen by herself, as she asserts +in our Summary, <a href="#defno2">No. 2</a>, letter K. For proof of this statement +she can bring no other evidence than that she does not know +how to write. Summary, <a href="#defno2">No. 2</a>, letters B, H, and K.</p> + +<p>In this, furthermore, she stands most clearly convicted of +falsehood by her signature, which was recognised by herself at +the command of the court while she was in prison, as we find in +the prosecution for flight (p. 39). She also stands convicted of +falsehood by the signature of her marriage agreement, concerning +the truth of which it would be ill to doubt, both because there is +along with it the signature of one of the Lord Cardinals, and +because her handwriting was recognised by herself who had +written it, at the demand of the notary, as is to be seen in the +copy filed in the prosecution for flight, p. 132. And, furthermore, +she is convicted by the priest with whom she fled, who asserts +that more than once at night he has received letters which were +either thrown out of the window by her or were sent by a +servant; we give his deposition in our Summary, <a href="#defno5">No. 5</a>, letters +A, B, C, and D. This is verified by the Fiscal witness (p. 108), +where we read: "And she threw down a note, as I saw very +clearly, and the Canon picked it up, and went away." There +are, besides, the letters and sheets of paper filled with mutual +love, found in the prison at Castelnuovo, where they themselves +were overtaken. But it is utterly impossible that the characters +of these were also marked by her husband, nor is it told by +whom they were written; accordingly it is to be presumed that +they were devised by herself, lest she might betray their forbidden +love-intrigues, which they would have to hide with the +greatest care. And I pray that the abovesaid letter be submitted +to our eyes, and it will be clearly seen whether the +characters were formed by one not knowing how to write, but +forming them in ink in imitation of certain signs, or rather by +the expert hand of the woman herself. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">113</a></span></p> + +<p>In the first place, the truth of the said letter of which we are +speaking, we may gather from the letter of the Governor of +Arezzo, in our Summary, <a href="#defno1">No. 1</a>, where we find: "Of much +greater scandal were the flights and petitions made by the said +wife, their daughter, to Monsignor the Bishop. These were +made for no other reason than that neither she nor her parents +wished to stay any longer in Arezzo, but desired to return to +Rome. When she had been rebuked by that most prudent +Prelate, he always sent her home in his carriage."</p> + +<p>And this is likewise expressly deducible from another letter of +the most reverend Bishop, which is given in the Summary, +<a href="#defno6">No. 6</a>, where we read: "The more she made outcry, that much +the more she had been urged thereto by the instigation of her +mother." And after a few words: "I have some knowledge of +this, because Senator Marzi-Medici, who presides over the secular +government of this city for our Most Serene Grand Duke, has +told me all."</p> + +<p>It is verified still further by another letter of Signor Bartolommeo +Albergotti, produced by the other side, which is given +in the Summary of that side, <a href="#procno2">No. 2</a>, at the end. But the letter +is not given in its entirety, for, where it speaks of the Secretary +of the Bishop urging Count Guido and his mother, we should +read there: "Not to maltreat the Signora for the affront offered +him. After disputes enough of this kind, he took the Signora +back home. And she declared that she was absolutely unwilling +to live with Signora Beatrice and with the Canon Girolamo, her +brother-in-law." And after a few other matters: "I pray yourself +and Signora Violante to be willing to offer a remedy by +instilling the wife with a tranquil peace, which will be for the +quiet of all" (as we read in page 190).</p> + +<p>This is also proved by the letter of the Abate produced on the +other side (p. 182), where we read: "By Signor Guido, my +brother, several offers have been made to him, but have not +been accepted; and they insist that we force our mother and the +Signor Canon to leave the house. But this shall never be, even +if there do not follow both love and concord. I will never advise +that."</p> + +<p>And from the letter of Signor Romano, 188, later, where we +read (cf. p. liv.): "I have known why she fled to Monsignor, and +it was because she did not wish to live with the Canon and +Beatrice," etc. (which words are not noted in the Summary of +the Fisc, <a href="#procno2">No. 2</a>).</p> + +<p>See for yourselves, therefore, that Francesca was not maltreated, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">114</a></span> +although she so deserved because of her eager and indecent +recourse without cause to the most reverend Bishop. +Hence it is evident whether the Comparini left Arezzo and Francesca +fled from home because of ill-treatment.</p> + +<p>It remains now that we see—even granting this ill-treatment—what +cause of fleeing from the home of her husband Francesca +might have, or rather if her flight were not scandalous. This +will not be difficult to make clear, if we will dwell for a little +while upon the deposition of the same Francesca and upon the +letters found in the said prison of Castelnuovo. These latter +were produced by the Fisc in the prosecution for flight, though +they were not given recognition. The lack of this acceptance +cannot stand in our way, nor do I think it can be denied that +they are of the same handwriting, if they are compared with the +assured writing of the command of the court. Furthermore, +as they contain love affairs, and the name of Guido himself, no +sensible person will think that they were not written by them.</p> + +<p>From her own deposition, it is evident that she was often +abused for her sterility, and was terrified by threats of death on +account of her love affairs with the said priest (as we see in the +said Summary, <a href="#defno2">No. 2</a>, letter A). Nor was the cautious husband +deceived, since her love increased day by day, while her conjugal +affection indeed decreased just as her feeling for her lover increased. +In the said letters (which are given in Summary, <a href="#defno7">No. 7</a>), +that priest is called: Beloved, Adored, Mirtillus, My Soul, +Most Dearly Beloved, Narcissus, My Eagerly Craved Blessing, +Dearest Idol; and she signs herself "Thy faithful Sweetheart," +and "Amarillis." And conversely, she is called by her lover +"My Adored Signora." And in the details of those letters +is expressed her intense love and the ardour with which that +unfortunate one was burning for her lover, as is evident. Nor +may I without shame refer to the very tender expressions of her +love. But one of them, and possibly a second, I may not omit, +that "from the claw, you may recognise the lion." Thus in +letter 17, we read: "So that you cannot say that I no longer +love you; because all my good wishes for Signor Guido are turning +toward you, who deserve it." And this possibly is the reason +why she refused to lie with her husband, as the said letter of +Signor Albergotti points out, where he says: "The Signora has +been melancholy, and two evenings after your departure she made +a big disturbance, because she did not wish to go and sleep with +Signor Guido, her husband, which displeases me very much."</p> + +<p>In the first letter [we read]: "My affection no longer has any +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">115</a></span> +rein"; in the fourth: "I am ready to do what I have told you"; +in the tenth: "I will suffer quietly the pains which are pleasing +to you." And it would be a long task and a disgusting one, to +tell them over singly. For she was unwilling to conform herself +to the chaste manners of Arezzo, accustomed as she was to living +a freer life. This may be read in the letter of Abate Franceschini +produced by the other side (page 179), and following, where we +read:</p> + +<p>"These occasions for bitterness, which have arisen between +yourselves and Signor Guido, I do not wish to examine. I know +enough to say that this has arisen from your wishing to turn the +wife from what, according to the custom of the country, her +husband both may and ought to do. Because over the wife God +has given him authority, and likewise it is the general usage and +the custom of the country. If yourself and Signor Pietro should +stand in the way of this, you would do wrong, and it would be the +duty of the husband to admonish his wife." And in another +letter, p. 124, we read: "I cannot persuade myself that my +mother and brothers would conduct themselves in such a way +as to force her to have such recourse." And after a few words +we read: "And know well that what I have endeavoured by my +words to urge upon Signora Francesca, Signor Pietro, and yourself +is only out of pure zeal for the honour of your house and of +yourselves."</p> + +<p>On the other hand, the same thing is to be drawn from the +letter of the said priest (as we read in letter 20): "I have received +your notes, full of those expressions [of love], etc. Be pleased +to receive me into your bosom, in which I rest all my affections." +And the letters which have reference to the flight give clear +proof of the mutual exchange of affection, as is well proved by +the effect that followed. Thus, in letter 18, we read: "I wish +to know whether you can leave Sunday evening, that is to-morrow +evening; for if you do not go away to-morrow evening, +God knows when you will go, because of the scarcity of carriages." +And after a few intervening words: "As soon as you see that +they are sound asleep, open the door for me, so that I may +help you make up your bundles and collect the money." And +after a few more words: "Praying God that he will make this +design of ours turn out well."</p> + +<p>And letter 19 of the same lover, in which proofs of love are +given by no means obscurely, also shows us of what quality +those loves were, where we read: "That the Jealous One seems +pacified, and that he has said you were at the window, is a very +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">116</a></span> +bad sign; because he will wish to find out in that way what you +do at the window, and for what purpose you are there. For +[Conti] has told me that now he is more jealous than at first, +and that if he find out anything he will wish to avenge himself +by putting you to death and will wish to find means to do the +same to me."</p> + +<p>It is proved still further that the wretched Accused complained +bitterly that she was not content merely with a single lover at +Arezzo, but that she has been defiled by many suitors, so that +she multiplied the disgraces to his house (page 98), and following. +We also read clearly in the seventh letter:</p> + +<p>"I met Signor Doctor, as usual. He asked me where I was +going, and along the street he asked me why I had written +scornfully to him. I told him that he deserved even worse, +because he had given evil deeds and good words; for he had +said he was fond of me, that he wished him and the rest of them +'in Sovara.'"</p> + +<p>And in the thirteenth:</p> + +<p>"As to the Doctor, you offend me by saying that I will love +him again. I tell you, as sure as the Sun shall rise, I have not +the heart for another such blow."</p> + +<p>It is therefore quite evident whether Francesca had an honest +cause for leaving the home of her husband, or whether she was +not rather impelled by the more urgent spurs of love. It may +be said now that these letters were sent for a good purpose, that +the priest might be induced to accompany her so that she might +shun the danger of death, since she found herself therein without +any just cause. And it may be said that she could have kept +her modesty uninjured in the company of her lover. But since +without doubt the amorous expressions used in the letters do +not show chastity of mind and a modest disposition, and as +just cause for flight is lacking, the veil wherewith her viciousness +tried to hide itself is destroyed. I acknowledge that Judith, who +was an entirely chaste widow, of decorous appearance and fine +looking in many ways, made advances toward a very licentious +enemy; but this was for the purpose of accomplishing a pious +work, namely, to liberate her own native land. She was +provided not with lascivious letters, but with earnest words, +the unimpaired modesty of which it were evil to doubt, since +she was moved by the breath of the Holy Spirit. But to-day, +how very few Judiths are found; yet the daughters of Lot are +multiplied, who when they could not preserve their sense of +shame even in their father's company made him drunken with +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">117</a></span> +wine, lest he, when sober, would deny them because they were +sinning weakly, so that, when out of his own mind, he was +involuntarily polluted with nefarious incest. (Genesis, chapter +29.) Do we believe that a girl who was dying for love, and +who burned most ardently for the company of the loving Cupid +and her lover, would keep safe her modesty during a long +journey? Which modesty I only wish she had preserved in +the home of her husband!</p> + +<p>And even if Guido had imposed upon her, without due reason, +a just fear of death, she should not therefore have increased his +suspicion of base and lustful acquaintanceship by choosing as her +companion in flight that priest whom her husband had suspected; +for Caponsacchi was not at all related to herself or her husband, +as each of them confesses in our Summary, <a href="#defno2">No. 2</a>, letter G, and +<a href="#defno5">No. 5</a>, letter E. Thus she would prove her dishonour. But +while still guarding carefully her matronly shame, she might +either have entered some monastery with the help of some +church official, if she had used truth and not falsehoods; or she +might have had recourse to the civil governor, who, after +examining all things, would have afforded her a safe return to +the City in company with honest men and women; or he might +have placed her in the home of some honest matron, with due +safeguards. But even if she had no faith in either of these, and +was determined to go back to Rome, she might at least have +entered upon the journey with one of the servants.</p> + +<p>Likewise, the other excuse for putting an honest face on the +illicit amour falls to the ground—namely, that concerning the +aforesaid flight another priest, the brother-in-law of the sister-in-law +of the said Francesca, was informed. For if the abovesaid +letters are read through carefully, the suspicion of illicit +correspondence with his connivance is very greatly increased. +We read in letter 11:</p> + +<p>"You tell me that [Conti] is unwilling to bring letters for you. +But let me inform you that I am wheedling him; and I have the +wits to bring it about that he will carry them for you. Because +I say two kind words to him, and he is charmed and will do +what I wish."</p> + +<p>And in letter 19 of the lover:</p> + +<p>"For he has told me that now he is more jealous than at first, +and that if he finds out about anything, he will wish to avenge +himself."</p> + +<p>But who would judge that we can deduce from the said words +that their mutual love was chaste, because another priest was +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">118</a></span> +aware of it. I know that for Francesca to show herself at the +window at the hiss of her lover in company with the other +priest does not savour well. Of this a witness for the Fisc, in +the prosecution for flight, gives oath (pp. 107-8). Therefore, not +without cause did Count Guido have suspicion also of the other +priest, as Francesca herself asserted in her deposition in our +Summary, <a href="#defno2">No. 2</a>, before letter A.</p> + +<p>These [two] things are taken as proved therefore: [first] that +it is not established that Francesca was threatened with death +without just and legitimate cause, and [second] that a most +suspicious correspondence with her lover is established. It will +follow that the threats were offered by her husband to preserve +his honour, and so it was in the power of Francesca to free +herself from these threats without scandal, without flight, and +without shame, by living chastely. She, however, was too +prone to the tickling of the flesh, and had deferred all things to +the fulfilling of her vicious desire, without respect to her violation +of conjugal faith. It is all too foolish to doubt her utter recklessness, +since it is manifestly evident from matters brought forward +in the prosecution for flight, and especially from the reciprocal +love between the lovers, etc. It is also clear from the letters +containing such very tender expressions. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>As to the entry and egress of the said priest from the home of +Francesca at a suspicious time, a witness for the prosecution +testifies (p. 107): "At the sound of the Ave Maria, while I was +at the same window, I saw the door of the said Signori +Franceschini open very softly, and from it passed the said +Signor, etc. He pulled the door to as he went out, but did not +in fact close it, and therefrom, after a little while, I saw the said +Signora Francesca Pompilia, with a light in her hand, who +closed the said door." It is also proved from letter 11, where +we read: "For that reason, I do not have you come here +because now the street-door is no longer opened, but you might +be able to open the back-door," etc. This of itself is enough to +prove adultery, even when trial is being made to demand +punishment therefore. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Her leaning from the window at a hiss, day and night, and +their mutual nods, concerning which a witness testifies, p. 108, +are quite enough to prove carnal communication. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Then there is the manner in which they prepared for the flight, +which includes, as I may say, a show of treachery, as is to be +understood from the letter of the priest, No. 18, where [we read]: +"Above all, try to put some into all their cups, but do not +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">119</a></span> +yourself drink it." For in seeking an opportunity to mingle an +opiate for them, he was inquiring what coloured wine they were +drinking in the home, lest, as I suppose, the colour of it when +altered by the drug mixed therewith might betray their plots. +So in letter 4, where we read: "Then, further, if they continue +to drink the red wine I will tell you so." In No. 12: "When +you tell me that it is not possible to make my mother sleep, +while she is ill, and drinks no wine." And in letter 13: "As +to what you wish to know about the wine, I tell you that it is +red now, but I do not know how much longer it will be so; +but I will let you know about it."</p> + +<p>Still further this most wretched wife was moved with a burning +ardour for the said priest, as is noted in letters 5 and 21; +this is usually conceived by lovers only. Therefore, since it is +undeniable that the carnal love was reciprocal between them, +I think it can not be doubted that her departure from the home +of her husband and their association through a long journey, +prove their adultery. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>In the progress of the journey kisses were given on both sides; +of this the witness for the prosecution testifies; but I do not +find in the evidence that he saw these at night, as is supposed +by the other side; for page 100 asserts "I only saw that at +times they kissed each other." And these kisses Francesca so +strongly desired to give and to receive likewise, that in letter 11 +[we read]: "I thank you for the kisses you send me; but if +yourself could give them to me, I would hold them dear. I +give you as many million more." And in letter 10: "And +giving you an amorous kiss." And in 5: "I say good-bye +with a million kisses." And here and there in the other letters. +These render the adultery not at all doubtful, so much so that +there are not wanting authorities who assert that when the kiss +is proved the adultery may be said to be proved. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Therefore, unless I am very much mistaken, no one who knew +what we have recounted could be found so senseless and so weak-minded +as not to believe strongly that when they were found in +the inn her matronly shame had been tampered with, either +during the journey or at night while they were taking their rest, +or more probably in the morning while they were enjoying each +other's society.</p> + +<p>But passing over the fact that the priest was clothed in laic +garb (pp. 4 and 100), which affords no small weight for the proof +of the adultery, all further doubts are removed, since they +arrived together at the tavern of Castelnuovo at half-past seven +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">120</a></span> +at night, as three witnesses for the prosecution agree in swearing +(pp. 44, 47, 49). And although two beds were in the chamber, +only one indeed did the said priest wish to have made ready, and +all night long, behind closed doors, he rested alone with her (if +lovers can rest); from this the adultery is proved without doubt. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>This proof indeed becomes all the stronger from the lie of +Francesca, who asserts that they arrived at the said tavern at +dawn (Summary, <a href="#defno2">No. 2</a>, letters F and L). For if no evil had +been done she would not have attempted to hide the truth. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>Finally, the sentence or decree of this Tribunal, which is given +in Summary, <a href="#defno8">No. 8</a>, where the said priest is condemned for carnal +knowledge of Francesca, removes all doubt; because the +adultery is thereby rendered infamous, as was proved in our +other argument. And though it is asserted that it was in the +minds of the Lords Judges to modify this sentence and to add +"for pretended carnal knowledge," yet it never was thus +modified. And yet such modification would not have stood +in the way after it had reached the ears of the luckless husband +that the adultery of his wife had been made manifest and +notorious and had been confirmed by the Judges' decree.</p> + +<p>But certainly, even if we are cut off from this proof, their +carnal communication remains more than sufficiently proved +for our purpose; for we are arguing not for the infliction of the +penalty of adultery, but we have deduced the adultery for exclusion +of a penalty. [Citations.] For it is quite customary +that, for a civil purpose, such as divorce or loss of dowry, +adultery is abundantly proved by circumstantial evidence. +[Citations].</p> + +<p>Nor is it of consequence that some of the stronger proofs are +proved by single witnesses; for we are arguing to establish +dishonesty and adultery in kind; not for the purpose of condemning +the adulteress, but for the defence of the accused.</p> + +<p>And the reason is very evident, because to excuse a husband +from the murder of his adulterous wife after an interval, an exact +proof of the adultery is not required, but strong suspicion of +adultery is quite abundant, as Sanfelicius testifies it was decided +(<i>dec. 337, num. 13</i>). But we are upon firmer grounds, because we +not only have strong suspicions drawn from single witnesses, +but other finely proved grounds, yes, the clearest of proofs, +deduced by the Prosecution.</p> + +<p>Very little does it stand in the way of this proof of her guilt +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">121</a></span> +that Francesca, when near to death, tried to exculpate herself +and her lover by asserting that there had been no sin between +them; for this kind of exculpation, which is all too much a +matter of pretence, might help her companion just as theretofore +she had brought blame upon him; and by no other proof might +his inculpation have been removed. This would indeed aid her +fellow, but not herself. But since she stands convicted by the +abovesaid proofs of having broken her matrimonial faith, it +would be absurd that an exculpation made that she might seem +to die an honest woman, should be of such efficiency as to destroy +the proofs of her baseness. [Citations.] And what is more +horrible, that from the said exculpation, her murderer might be +the more severely punished.</p> + +<p>I have faith, and this helps me to hope, that her soul rests in +eternal safety, by divine aid, since she had time to hate her +previous life. But no man of sense could praise her testamentary +disposition, in which she appointed as her sole heir her son, who, +as I hear, was but just born and hence innocent, and who had +been hidden away from his father, and which appointed as +residuary legatee a stranger joined by no bond of relationship.</p> + +<p>From these considerations, therefore, it is plain that the +adultery of Francesca is fully proved. Hence according to the +opinion of the Fisc, her murder, even if committed after an +interval, is not to be expiated by the death penalty; not only +because of the justly conceived grievance, but because the injury +to the honour always keeps its strength, according to the sentiment +of Virgil in the <i>Æneid</i>, Book I: "Keeping an eternal +wound within the breast."</p> + +<p>It is of no force in response to this that he did not kill his wife +and the adulterer, whom he had overtaken at the inn of Castelnuovo, +but that he merely saw to their imprisonment; as if that, +after his recourse to the judge, he could not with his own hand +avenge his honour.</p> + +<p>For we deny in the face of all heaven that he could have killed +either of them, because he was worn out by the rapid journey, +and was so perturbed by the agitation of his mind, that he was +seized by a fever. And furthermore he had heard that the said +priest was armed with firearms, as he asserted in the prosecution +for flight, at a time when his word cannot be suspected, because +the murders had not yet been committed (pp. 76 and 77). It is +also true that the priest was a terrible fellow, according to the +witness for the prosecution (p. 167), and as Francesca herself +confesses. Elsewhere, the Accused speaks of the taking away +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">122</a></span> +of an arquebus pointed at the officers, as he himself asserts +(p. 71). And, furthermore, Caponsacchi was all too prompt and +too much disposed to resisting, as we read in letter 18. There, +in speaking of the opiate to be given to the domestics, he adds: +"If by ill luck they shall find it out and shall threaten you with +death, open the door, that I may die with you, or free you from +their hands." And the wife, indeed, was unterrified, full of +threatening, angered, and even furious, as the outcome proved; +since when captured by the posse of the Ecclesiastical Court, +she dared in the very presence of the officers and other witnesses +to rush upon her husband with drawn sword. And she would +easily have killed him, if she had not been hindered (p. 50). He, +indeed, weak, as he is, and of insufficient strength, could not +have taken vengeance by killing both, or either of them, provided +as he was with only a traveller's sword. Hence, as he was not +able to kill them, he saw to their imprisonment in the confusion +of his mind, in order that he might prevent the continuation of +his disgrace, and thus might hinder their future adultery.</p> + +<p>But, indeed, even if he could have killed them, and did not do +so, he would be praiseworthy; for up to that time the adultery +had not been made notorious by the sentence of the judge, and +only strong suspicions of it were urging him on.</p> + +<p>But as for the recourse to the judge, whereby it can be claimed +that he renounced the right to kill his adulterous wife, which we +deny, I pray you note that the Tribunal acted prudently in +placing Francesca in the Monastery, that she might be kept +more decently than in a prison. Then when it received the +attestation of the physician as to her condition, lest she might +be kept there destitute of necessary aids, and so might undergo +punishment in the very course of events (which is everywhere +avoided), after obtaining the consent of Abate Franceschini, +brother of the Accused, the court permitted her to be placed in +the home of her parents with the warning to keep that home as +a prison.</p> + +<p>But I cannot commend any one, whoever he may be, who +tried to get Francesca from the Monastery under the false +pretence of ill health, since he could legitimately and with more +decency have succeeded in his intent by laying bare the truth, +namely her pregnancy. But this was done for no other reasons +than these: either that the son might be hidden away from +Count Guido, since the law presumes that he was born of his +legitimate father, although his wife had shown herself incontinent; +or else Francesca, believing that the child was conceived +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">123</a></span> +of some one else, possibly was trying to hide from her husband +the fact of her pregnancy.</p> + +<p>And now in the meantime, let it please my Most Illustrious +Lord to turn his eyes toward Arezzo and for a little while to +think of Count Guido stained with infamy, when the decree of +condemnation for adultery reached his ears. The adulteress was +still unpunished, and he was ignorant of the fact that she could +not be punished, owing to her supposed ill health, and that during +her pregnancy, which she had so carefully hidden from him, +she was unsuited to the vengeance of the sword. Furthermore, +when he saw that Francesca had gone back to that very suspicious +home of Pietro and Violante, who had instilled Francesca +with dishonesty, had repudiated her, and had professed that she +was the daughter of a harlot, he lost all patience, as is evident +from the deposition of Blasio (p. 318), where we read: "But still +further, she had been received back into the home, after she ran +away from Guido, although the latter had put her in a Monastery." +This change drove to desperation her luckless husband, who was +at least an honourable man. Therefore his recourse to the judge +ought not to increase the penalty for him.</p> + +<p>We do not deny that Abate Franceschini had given consent to +the removal of Francesca to the home of Pietro and Violante (in +order that we may yield to our respect for my Lord Advocate of +the Fisc), but only on verbal representation, for I have not been +able to see it in writing. But, for our proposition, this does not +affect Count Guido, since it is not made clear that he was informed +of such consent, and thus far the Fisc merely presumes that he +had been informed by Abate Franceschini, his brother, of this +consent. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>We are compelled to affirm that this knowledge is not to be +presumed as is shown below, or at the very worst there is present +only presumptive knowledge. And I do not think that on this +kind of merely presumptive knowledge the death penalty can be +demanded, nor can Count Guido be condemned, since he has +neither confessed nor been convicted of such knowledge: +chapter <i>nos in quemquam</i>, where we read: "We cannot inflict +sentence upon any one unless he is either convicted or has confessed +of his own accord."</p> + +<p>Indeed, what if Count Guido had acknowledged that he had +written the consent furnished by the Abate, his brother, since it +had no special authorisation for that particular matter; nor a +general authorisation to conduct litigation, but only to receive +moneys taken from himself by Francesca, as is to be seen (p. 136). +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">124</a></span> +By exceeding the limit of his power, Abate Paolo would have +exasperated the mind of Guido; for the luckless man was already +burning so with rage at the temerity of Francesca, Pietro, and +Violante, that he was almost driven, I might say, to taking +vengeance. He had put this off as long as he had any hope that +he might have the marriage annulled because of mistake concerning +the person married. For he was ignorant of the point of +Canon Law that error as to the nature of the person contracted +does not render a marriage null, but only an error as to the +individual. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Nor does it amount to anything that Francesca, at the time +she was killed, was under surety to keep the home as a prison, +as if she were resting in the custody of the Prince. For, however +that may be, even if the Accused had killed Francesca to the +offence of the Prince, yet since he wished to recover his honour +and to remove with her blood the unjust stains upon his reputation, +for this particular reason the aforesaid custody is not to be +given attention, nor does it increase the crime; as in the more +extreme case of one injuring a person having safe-conduct from +the Prince, Farinacci affirms in making a distinction [Citation] +where knowledge thereof is not to be presumed.</p> + +<p>Furthermore, when we speak of custody we should understand +it to apply to public custody and not to a private home as was +proved in our other argument. Nor is the response enough that +this would hold good in the one under custody, but not concerning +the custodian, Violante; for I do not know any probable distinction +between the two, since both cases may suffice for escaping +the penalty; nor is any stronger reason to be found for the one +than for the other. And indeed a third case would be more +worthy of excuse, of one who broke this kind of custody, when +knowledge thereof was not proved. Because such an offence +might arise under such custody, just as one who had killed a +person under bann, but ignorant of that bann, excused himself. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>If therefore Count Guido is not to be punished for murder of +his wife, for the same reason he cannot be punished for the +murder of Pietro and Violante, because these murders were +committed for the same cause, <i>causa honoris</i>. For at their +instigation, Francesca found her lover, and still more, in order +that they might disgrace Guido, they did not blush to declare +that Francesca had been conceived illegitimately, and had been +born of a harlot. This greatly blackens the honour of an entire +house, as Gratian observes [Citation]; for the daughters of such +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">125</a></span> +are usually like their mothers. Then also, as I have said above, +the Accused burned with anger when he had notice of the return +of Francesca to their home (p. 318), and the following. And +Alexander proves this in his confession where he says (p. 646): +"So that he had to kill his wife, his mother-in-law, and his +father-in-law: because the said mother-in-law and father-in-law +had a hand in making their daughter do evil, and had acted as +ruffians to him." This following fact makes it all the clearer, +because on the fatal evening when they were slain, at the knock +on the door, and as soon as Violante heard the much beloved +name of the lover, straightway she opened it. And thus she +showed, unless I am mistaken, what removes all doubt that +Pietro and Violante were not at all offended with the love affairs +of their daughter and her lover.</p> + +<p>It is all one, because we are compelled to acknowledge either +[first] that the Comparini had done new injury to his honour by +receiving her into their home after they had declared that she +was not their daughter, and after her adultery was clearly manifest, +and hence there should be departure from the ordinary +penalty. [Citation.] For just indignation, when once conceived, +always oppresses the heart and urges one to take vengeance. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>Or else [secondly] we must acknowledge a cause of just anger +continued, and indeed was increased, which is quite enough +foundation for asserting that the murders were committed incontinently. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Since, then, from the confession of Count Guido as well as from +that of his associates, and since from so very many proofs +brought forward in the trial, it is evident that Guido was moved +to kill them by his sense of injured honour, in vain does the +Fisc pretend that for some other remote reason he committed +the crimes. For, to tell the truth, I find no other cause which +does not touch and wound the honour, if we only bear in mind +what Guido has said in the trial (pp. 96 and 97): namely, that the +Comparini had arranged the flight of Francesca and had plotted +against his life. This alone would be enough to free him from +the ordinary penalty. Bertazzolus and Grammaticus [Citation], +testify that a man was punished more mildly who had had one +who threatened him killed, though the threats were not clearly +proved. [Citations.] "And the death which he had threatened +fell upon himself, and what he planned he incurred," and also: +"There is no doubt that one who had gone with the intention of +inflicting death seems to have been slain justly." +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">126</a></span></p> + +<p>Another cause of the murder alleged by the Fisc is the lawsuit +brought to annul the promise of dowry. Upon this point a complete +and a very skilful examination was made by the other side, +and because of this it was pretended that he had incurred the +penalties of the Alexandrian Constitution and of the Banns. +But this pretence in fact soon vanishes. For if we look into it +well we shall find, without difficulty, that a cause of this kind is +no less offensive to the sense of honour. For the ground on +which Pietro had attempted to free himself from the obligation to +furnish the promised dowry was this solely: that Francesca was +not his own daughter, but the child of an unknown father and of a +harlot. Every man, however, well knows whether this kind of a +declaration would wound the reputation of a nobleman.</p> + +<p>Whether or not a pretence of this kind could have found a place +for itself before we had the confessions of Count Guido and his +companions, as I have said above (for then the Fisc might have +been in doubt how Guido could be moved to kill her), yet thereafter +it was clear from the confessions of them all that the sense +of injured honour had given him the impulse, and had even compelled +him to the killing, as Count Guido asserts (p. 678) where +we read: "To inflict wounds upon them, inasmuch as they had +injured my honour, which is the chief thing." Vain is it to +inquire whether he had killed them for some other reason, +because, as it was clearly for honour's sake, the Fisc never could +prove that they were killed on account of the lawsuit, and not +on account of honour, as is required for the incurring of the +penalty of the aforesaid Bull. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>These statements are apt also as regards the murder of Francesca, +who had sought a divorce. For if she had made pretence +of being separated from him for any other reason, and if her dishonour +were not perfectly clear, then indeed there might be room +for the Alexandrian Constitution. But since wounded honour +gave occasion for the murder, we are far beyond the conditions +of the Alexandrian Constitution. Otherwise a very fine way +would be found for wives to act the prostitute with impunity. +For if it were possible, after adultery was admitted, to bring +suit for divorce, they would find a safe refuge to escape the +hands of justly angered husbands, and would be rendered safe +by the protection of the said Bull even though the divorce was +not obtained and though the husbands had been offended because +of their dishonour.</p> + +<p>But still less can such capital punishment be inflicted upon +Guido on the pretext that he assembled armed men, contrary +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">127</a></span> +to the rule of the Apostolic Constitutions and Banns. For +whenever the question is whether a husband may assemble +men to kill his adulterous wife, we are still beyond the conditions +of the Constitutions; for they have place whenever men are +assembled for an indeterminate crime, and crime does not +follow; then indeed the provisions of the Bull are applicable. +But whenever men are joined together to commit crimes, and +these actually follow, attention is directed to the end for which +the men had been assembled, and the punishment for that is +pronounced, nor is there any further inquiry concerning the +beginning (that is, the assembling), as I have proved in my other +argument. And I now add another citation [Citations], where +after the question was disputed, he asserts: "But certainly, +notwithstanding what has been said above, in the current case, +I do not believe there should be any departure from the decision +of so many men, whom we may well believe have considered +and written the entire matter with maturity and prudence for +Our Most Sacred Lord Clement VIII." And at the end of this +addition, it is testified that the Apostolic Chamber had so decided +it at the order of the said Pope. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>This is also proved by the Banns of my Most Illustrious Lord +Governor, chapter 82, where they impose a penalty for +assembling men for an evil end, if the evil end may not have +followed. But they decide nothing when the crime for which +the men had been assembled had been put into execution, +because in this case the penalties for assembling cease and only +the penalty for the crime committed is inflicted, as was said +above.</p> + +<p>And that the assembling of men for the purpose of recovering +one's reputation does not fall under the penalties of the Apostolic +Constitutions (see <i>Farinaccius</i>, <i>cons. 65</i>, <i>No. 66</i>).</p> + +<p>Finally, the matter of carrying prohibited arms is still left for +consideration. Even if some authorities have asserted that this +is not to be confounded with the principal crime, yet the contrary +opinion is held by the majority; for the purpose is to be considered, +which the delinquent chiefly had in mind. So Bartolo +holds in our very circumstances. [Citations.] And on the +point that one killing for honour's sake, with prohibited arms, +is still to be punished more mildly, Matthæus testifies that it +has been so judged. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>This also holds good in the more extreme case of several +crimes, which can easily be committed separately and which +tend toward different ends; yet, if they are committed at the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">128</a></span> +same time and for the same end, the punishment only for the +crime which was chiefly in mind is imposed. Thus, if one wishing +to commit theft climb over the walls of the city, even +though he could commit that deed without the crime of crossing +the wall (which is a very grave crime, according to Farinaccius, +<i>quaest. 20</i>, <i>No. 146</i>), even then only a single penalty, namely that +for theft, is inflicted, as the one chiefly in mind; and this is a +little harsher than that for crossing the walls of the city, but +is not of utmost severity. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor does it escape my notice that the Banns of our Most +Illustrious Lord Governor, chapter 8, seem to settle the question +by deciding that the punishment for carrying arms ought not +to be confounded with punishment for the crime committed +therewith. Nor do I fail to see, still further, that these Banns +do not include one of the companions, who was a foreigner and +not of that district. But since by common law these Banns +receive a passive interpretation whenever arms are not borne +for an ill end, and then some crime is committed with them +(because the delinquent did not have in mind the crime which +he committed), he is punished for both crimes, because at divers +times he committed different crimes. But when any one bears +prohibited arms with the purpose of murder, and then commits +the murder, the chief crime of homicide, in view of which he +bore the arms, is considered and the penalty for murder is +inflicted, but not that for carrying the arms. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>I beg you note that this crime in question is made important +from the fact that those three who had no fear of ill, but who +ought by all means to have feared, were slain, and not because +of the kind of arms with which they were slain. The number +of the victims, and not the instrument of their death, excited +astonishment, and it would have been the very same if they +had been slain with the longest of swords, or with sticks, or with +stones. Therefore it would indeed be a very hard matter that +the Fisc should be aflame over these murders, and not being +able to demand the death penalty for them, should demand it +for the carrying of arms.</p> + +<p>But beside this, Count Guido denies expressly that he owned, +carried, or kept arms of unlawful measure. And although it is +asserted by the four associates that at the time of the murders +Guido had in his hands a short knife, and had given the same +kind of arms to his companions, yet these could not doom him +to the ordinary penalty. Thus Farinaccius and others affirm +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">129</a></span> +after this matter has been well discussed and the contrary +opinion confuted. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor does he deny that he had on his person a dagger which +was entirely lawful. But he did not have it with him at the +murder, nor did he carry it for the murder, but only to defend +himself if he should find in the aforesaid home outsiders ready to +use force against him. And that was permissible to him; for +there is ample right to bear arms of this kind throughout the +Ecclesiastical State, and (I may boldly add) even in the very +City. Because no mention is made of the City, although some +places are excepted; according to that very true axiom: "The +exception proves the rule in what is not excepted." [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And he could the more readily believe that it was permissible +for him to do so, because he had enemies in the city who +threatened him there and made plots against him, as Guido +himself says; and therefore the bearing of arms of this kind +was more necessary here than elsewhere.</p> + +<p>Nor is it to the point that, because it is claimed he had killed +with forethought, the privilege of bearing this kind of arms +should not be granted him. For aside from what is said above +and in the other argument establishing the fact that the aforesaid +crimes were "for honour's sake," they cannot be said to be +committed "after an interval." The objection might hold +good if he had used the arms in the murder, but as this is not +established, it does not seem possible to deny him the right to +carry the arms. In any case, although strictly speaking he +could be said to have done the killing when armed with the +said arms, yet he should not be punished with the extreme +penalty of death. In <i>Caballus</i>, <i>case 90</i>, <i>No. 7</i>: "Yet in fact in +these cases, I have never seen the death penalty follow, but by +grace it is commuted to a milder penalty."</p> + +<p>Finally, he cannot be said to have incurred the penalty for +prohibited arms from the fact that he was present at the murders +committed by his associates with such arms; because the +penalty of this kind which is due to one furnishing the said arms +does not extend to the helpers and assistants. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>I do not speak of Domenico and Francesco, because these last +two, as foreigners, are not bound by our Banns. But all matters +fight for all of them, and every single ground for the diminution +of the punishment, which favours Count Guido, also favours +them all; since accessories are not to be judged on different +grounds from the principal, as I have shown in my other argument. +There I cited, not the authority of one or another +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">130</a></span> +doctor singly, but the decisions of the highest magistrates. +Clar also testifies that this opinion has been observed in actual +practice. (§ <i>Homicidium</i>, <i>sub No. 51</i>).</p> + +<p>But I earnestly beg that my Most Illustrious Lord will be +pleased to consider with kindly countenance and untroubled +vision that Count Guido did the killing that his honour, which +had been buried in infamy, might rise again. He killed his +wife, who had been his shame, and her parents, who had set +aside all truthfulness and had repudiated their daughter. Nor +had they blushed to declare that she was born of a harlot, in +order that he might be disgraced. They also perverted her +mind, and not merely solicited, but even by the strength of her +filial obligation compelled her to illicit amours. He killed her +lest he might live longer in disgrace, loathed by his relatives, +pointed out by the noble, abandoned by his friends, and laughed +at by all. He killed her, indeed, in that City which in olden +days had seen a noble matron wash away the stains of shame +with her own blood—stains which against her will the son of a +king had imposed upon her. And thus she expiated the violent +fault of another by her own death. (See Valerius Maximus and +Titus Livius.) This city also saw a father go entirely unpunished, +and even receive praise, who had stained his hands +with the murder of his daughter, lest she might be dragged away +to shame. [Citations.] So much did the fear of losing his +honour weigh upon his heart, that he preferred to be deprived +of his daughter rather than that she should continue to live in +dishonour, even against her own wish. Count Guido did the +killing in their own home, that the adulteress and her parents, +who were aware of her crime, might find out that no place nor +refuge whatsoever was safe from and impenetrable by one whose +honour had been wounded. He killed them lest deeds of shame +might be continued there, and that the home which had been +witness of these disgraces might also be witness of their punishment. +He killed them because in no other way could his +reputation, which had been so enormously wounded, find healing. +He killed them that he might afford wives an example that the +sacred laws of marriage should be religiously kept. He killed +them, finally, that either he might live honourably among men, +or at least might fall the pitied victim of his own offended +honour.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Giacinto Arcangeli</span>, <i>Procurator of the Poor</i>.</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft9" id="ft9">File-title of Pamphlet 9.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor of the<br /> +City in Criminal Cases</i>:</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For Count Guido Franceschini and his Associates,<br /> +Prisoners, against the Fisc.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>New Memorial of law,<br /> +by the Advocate of the Poor.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">133</a></span></p> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA HOMICIDIORUM<a name="pamphlet9" id="pamphlet9"></a></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 9.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord:</p> + +<p>The confessions of Count Guido Franceschini, and of +Domenico Gambassini, Francesco Pasquini and Alessandro +Baldeschi, his companions, are null; and therefore they should +be given no consideration, as they issued under fear of the +rigorous torment of the vigil, unjustly decreed against them. +[Citations.] And this is true even though they still persevere in +the same confessions. [Citations.] For as we have said in our +past argument (which may be reassumed here by favour), the +Constitution of Paul V., of sacred memory, issued for the reformation +of the tribunals of the City [Citation], commands that +this torture be not inflicted except under two concurrent circumstances. +One of these is that the accused be under the strongest +of proofs, and the other that the crime be very atrocious. And +the authorities alleged in my argument, § <i>Quatenus</i>, etc., testify +that it has been so practised.</p> + +<p>Nor indeed can the asserted [discretionary] powers of this +tribunal give support; because, whatever they may be, they +have no place unless the crimes are punishable by death. +Raynaldus [Citation] gives this reason: Whenever the defendant +should not be condemned to death, he also should not, for the +purpose of getting confession from him, be exposed to torture +which might cause death, as it almost caused the death of +Alessandro, who fainted dead away under two turns at the +same torture.</p> + +<p>But the crime, which has been imputed to Count Guido and +his helpers, and which they themselves have confessed, is murder +neither of the first nor of the second degree, as was fully proved +in my past argument. And indeed since Count Guido was +moved to kill or to have killed both Francesca Pompilia, his +wife, and Pietro and Violante, his parents-in-law, because of +his sense of honour; namely, on account of the adultery which +Francesca Pompilia committed with their conspiracy and aid, +this fact relieves from the penalty of death, not merely himself +(according to the texts and authorities alleged in my said +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">134</a></span> +argument) [Citations], but also his helpers (according to the +authorities likewise alleged in said argument). [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Gabriel states: "And much less ought those to be punished +with death, because if we will only examine the common opinion +of wise men, just anger may excuse from a graver penalty than +this; for according to the Gracchian law, Code concerning +Adultery, even those who are called and led to the crime should +likewise be excused."</p> + +<p>Aside from what may be claimed in this present state of the +case, that the plea of injured honour is not established, the +decree in condemnation of the Canon Caponsacchi for the said +adultery issued in this tribunal, September 24, last past, and +given in full in our Summary, <a href="#defno8">No. 8</a>, makes the matter clear and +manifest. [Citations.] For it is there said: "Joseph Maria +Caponsacchi, of Arezzo, for complicity in the flight and running +away of Francesca Comparini, and for carnal knowledge of the +same, has been banished for three years to Civita Vecchia." +Nor can these words be said to be merely the title of the case, +which does not make any one guilty, as my Lord Advocate of +the Fisc supposes; but the very decree and the title of the case, +as seen by me in the original Process, was that which follows: +<i>Aretii in Etruria fugæ a viro</i>.</p> + +<p>But, in brief, the said Canon was condemned merely to the +said punishment because he was a foreigner and had committed +his crime outside of this State; in such case he should be +dismissed merely with exile. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Nor is it true that the Court receded from the said decree and +still less that a modification of it was demanded. For we have +no other fact than that for the purpose of giving some little +indulgence to the still asserted honour of the wife and to the +decorum of the said Canon, for which the Procurator of the +Poor, their defender, kept sharply and incessantly urging, in +the command for imprisonment, instead of the words of the said +decree, these other words were applied: <i>Pro causa de qua in +actis</i>. These words do not imply the correction of the preceding +words, but indeed the virtual insertion of all the acts, and +consequently of this same decree also. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And this is all the more true because the said decree could +not be changed unless both sides were heard; which, as I +remember, was the response given to the said Procurator when +he insisted upon the said modification. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But why should I now insist on former matters when there is +such conclusive proof of the adultery and further dishonour of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">135</a></span> +the said wife from the many strong reasons deduced in the +present stage of the case, and well weighed by my honourable +colleague, the Procurator of the Poor, in his customary excellent +manner? (I do not here repeat them, that I may avoid useless +superfluity.) Hence there is left no room for doubt as to the +outraged honour, which indeed impelled Count Guido to the +commission of crime. For it would be quite enough that a +cause of this kind be verified, even after one has committed the +crime, as Bertazzolus advises on this point. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Still further, there is no need now to insist on past matters +because Count Guido has stated the plea of injured honour not +merely against his wife, but against his parents-in-law in his +confession (especially page 98): "Thereupon followed her flight, +which was so disgraceful, not merely to my house, which is +noble, and would have been so to any house whatsoever, even +if of low estate. She made this escape by night with Canon +Caponsacchi and his companions. In the progress of her flight +along with the driver of the carriage, she was seen by the said +driver, kissing and embracing the abovesaid Canon. Still +further, I have found out that they slept together at Foligno +in the posthouse and then again at Castelnuovo. By such proof, +she stands convicted as an adulteress, not merely for this, but +for other like excesses, which I have since heard that she committed +in Arezzo with other persons." And page 672, where we +read: "And when the said Santi was asked whether he would +give ear to offering an affront to the Comparini, because of my +honour and the plots they had made against my life, Alessandro +responded that he would do it, and if some one else were necessary +he would find him. Accordingly, after a few days, I +received in my home Biagio, who has been twice named above, +in company with the abovesaid Santi, and he said that he also +would give ear to it, as being specially a question of my honour +and the contrivance against my life." And at page 678: "And +while we were staying in the same vineyard, that is in the house +within it, we spoke of various matters and particularly of what +was to be done, namely of the affronts to be offered to the +Comparini (that is to Pietro, Violante, and Francesca, my wife) +and of wounding them because they had taken away my honour, +which is the chief thing, and had also plotted against my life." +And at page 683, near the bottom, we read: "And I would have +so much to say that one might write from now till to-morrow +morning, if I wished to tell all the trouble and expense I have +suffered from the said Comparini. But all this would amount +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">136</a></span> +to nothing, if they had not touched my honour and plotted against +my life." And page 684: "The Santi above-named was a +labourer of mine at my villa of Vittiano, and consequently was +informed of all these troubles I had suffered at the hands of the +said Comparini. He also knew of the very indecent flight made +by my wife in the manner elsewhere told. The abovesaid Alessandro +then began of his own accord to seek me out and did +find me, so that he might give ear, in the event that I should +wish to avenge my honour and the plots which they had made +against my life." And page 699: "And she together with +Canon Caponsacchi was overtaken by myself at Castelnuovo, +where they were arrested by the officers and conducted to these +prisons. In the Court, many a time I laid stress on the crime +of her supposed conception in order that they might be punished. +I never having seen what would be considered expedient in an +affair of such importance to my honour, have been obliged to +take some resolution for recovering it, because the Comparini, +with greatest infamy, had transferred to me their own ignominy." +And page 722: "And what I said to Alessandro, Biagio, and +Domenico, I also said to Francesco once when he, knowing the +offences against my honour which I had suffered, asked me if I +were ready to give a beating to my said wife. And I then +replied to him that she deserved not merely a beating, but +death."</p> + +<p>Such a confession should be accepted with its own qualifications, +for the Fisc cannot divide and detach this from it (according +to the usual theory). [Citations.]</p> + +<p>This is undoubtedly true, when, as in the present case, one is +arguing for the infliction of the ordinary penalty, whatever may +be said, according to some authorities, for the infliction of an +extraordinary penalty. [Citations.] Ludovicus extends this +conclusion to all qualified confessions in any kind of crime.</p> + +<p>This is true especially when the qualification is not merely +propped up in some way, but is conclusively proved. [Citations.] +For beside the said decree, and the other considerations +above, we have his fellows in crime especially swearing that their +services were required by Count Guido for committing crime in +his very company for the abovesaid reason. Especially is this +the case with Blasio Agostinelli, page 316: "Signor Guido told +me that his wife had fled from him in company of an Abate, and +had carried away some money and jewellery. He led me into +the very room where she had robbed him of the said jewellery and +money, and told me that he wished to go to Rome to kill his +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">137</a></span> +wife, and that he wished that I and the said Alessandro would +go with him," etc. And page 317: "At the above time the said +Guido told me that his wife, for the purpose of fleeing securely +with the said Abate, and that he might not perceive it, had +mixed an opiate in the wine for dinner to put himself and all the +rest of them to sleep. He also said that he was in litigation with +his father-in-law, who had not merely sworn that the said wife +was not his own daughter, but still further had received her +back into his home, after she had run away from her husband, +although he would have put her in a monastery after he overtook +her at Castelnuovo during the flight." And Alessandro +Baldeschi (page 623): "The said Guido in the presence of myself, +as well as that of Biagio, Francesco, and Domenico, told me that +he ought to kill the lady, that is, his wife, who was here in Rome, +to recover his own honour; and also to kill the father and +mother of the said wife because they had lent her a hand in the +insult she had offered to his honour." And page 645: "He +told us also, in the presence of the keeper of the vineyard, that +he was obliged to kill his wife, his father-in-law, and his mother-in-law, +because the latter had lent a hand to their daughter in +her ill-doing, and had acted the ruffians too, and because the +said Guido also declared that these same people, whom he had to +kill, had wished to have himself, that is Guido, killed."</p> + +<p>Nor can the plea of injured honour be excluded by the attestations +of those who afforded assistance to Francesca Pompilia +even up to the time of her death: for they attest that she made +declaration that she had never violated her conjugal faith. +These assertions are merely testimony given outside of a trial, +and do not demand belief. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And more especially as they were extorted and begged (while +the suit was pending and the other side was not summoned), +by the heir of the same Francesca Pompilia, for avoiding the +prosecution by the Monastery of the Convertites, which was +laying claim to the succession to her property on account of her +dishonesty. Such shame would cause all of her hereditary +property to be sequestered and judicially assigned to the said +Monastery by law. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And this objection to their testimony is especially true because +some of the witnesses who swear as above are beneficiaries of +the same Francesca Pompilia, so that they might be swearing +for their own advantage. For if her dishonour were substantiated, +her property would devolve upon the said Monastery, and consequently +they would be shut out of their legacies. [Citations.] +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">138</a></span></p> + +<p>And however far these attestations may occasion belief, a +declaration of this kind serves to no purpose, because no one is +presumed to be willing to reveal his own baseness. [Citations.] +So likewise Francesca Pompilia should not be believed, especially +when testifying outside of a court and without oath. [Citations.] +Much less are the aforesaid witnesses to be believed, +lest more credence be given to hearsay evidence than to its +original. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor can it be said that no one is presumed to be unmindful of +his eternal safety; for all are not presumed to be Saint John +the Baptist. [Citation.] Especially when the argument is +concerning the prejudice of the third. [Citation.] And still +more so when the argument is for punishing more gravely the +enemy of the declarant. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And therefore, as the plea of injured honour is substantiated, it +makes no further difference that the said murders were committed +after an interval, according to what we have very fully +affirmed in our last argument, § <i>nec verum est</i>, even down to +§ <i>prædictis nullatenus</i>. There it was shown that this is the +general opinion of authorities, and in accordance therewith +judgment has been given from time to time not only in the +Sacred Courts, but also in all the other tribunals of the world, +as Matthæus well observes, etc. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Nor can there be any departure from this opinion in the present +case on the ground that Count Guido did not kill his wife in the +act of seizing her in her flight with her lover, but was indeed +content to carry her before the judge as an adulteress. For it +would not have been safe for him to kill her then; because he +was alone and she was in company of the said lover, a daring +young fellow, strong, and well armed, and accustomed to sinning. +And what is more, this lover was prompt and well prepared to +make resistance, lest his beloved Amarillis should be snatched +from him. Likewise she was prompt and ready to hinder her +husband even with a sword she had seized and drawn, lest her +beloved Mirtillo might be offended. Guido should not therefore +be considered to have spared her nor to have remitted his injury. +But lest she might escape into more distant parts where he could +have no hope of the due vengeance, his just and sudden anger +then counselled him to have her arrested by officers, so that he +might kill her as soon as possible; and when afterward a suitable +occasion arose, if he killed her, it should be considered as if he +had slain her immediately. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And, generally, whatever is done after an interval may be said +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">139</a></span> +to be done incontinently, if done as soon as a chance for doing it +was given. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But so far is the Law from believing that this kind of injury is +remitted by a husband that it rather believes that the spirit of +vengeance always continues in him. Therefore it comes about +that a wife may be held responsible for looking out for herself; +so much so, indeed, that her death which follows thereupon may +never be said to be treacherous. [Citations.] Muta speaks of +the case of a husband who had his wife summoned outside of the +city walls by his son, in order that he might kill her safely, and +yet the husband was condemned only to the oars for seven years.</p> + +<p>This also makes some difference in the case, that certain +authorities hold that a husband may indeed hide his wife's +baseness for the purpose of taking vengeance upon her safely +later on. [Citations.] Likewise he may have his wife hide his +disgrace for the purpose of taking vengeance securely upon the +one who wishes to offend her modesty, according to the very +famous council of <i>Castro</i> 277, <i>lib.</i> 2.</p> + +<p>And this is all the more to the point because Count Guido was +censured by the Procurator of the Poor himself, the defender of +Francesca and Canon Caponsacchi, for this appeal to the judge. +[Citations.] We have alleged many of these authorities in our +past argument, § <i>et hæc nostra</i>: for they unanimously assert that +husbands are considered vile and horned, if they do not take +vengeance with their own hands, but wait for that to be done +by the judges, who themselves ridicule and laugh at them. +Therefore it is no wonder if the luckless husband, after he had +made the said recourse to the judge, as the foolish heat of his +wrath suggested to him, wished to avenge himself for his lost +honour. For he sinned that he might shun the censure of the +vulgar and learned alike, and that he might not add this infamy +also to his lost honour.</p> + +<p>Nor is it at all to the point that the said Count Guido, in his +confession in one place, beside speaking of his injured honour, +also mentions the plots aimed at his life; because the force of +honour was far the stronger in his mind, as he himself asserts +(page 678): "In consideration of the fact that they had taken +away my honour, which is the principal thing." Nor ought +any consideration be given the other cause; because, as it is so +much weaker, it should be made to give way to the aforesaid +reason, as was proved in our former argument, § <i>Et in omnem +Casum</i>, where for another purpose we have adduced Matthæus +[Citation], who is speaking in these very terms. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">140</a></span></p> + +<p>And so far as we desire to give attention to this other cause, +it likewise is sufficient for escaping the ordinary penalty. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>The Fisc acknowledges the relevance of the abovesaid matters; +he therefore has recourse to the circumstances attending the +crime, namely, the assembling of armed men, the lawsuit going +on between Count Guido and the Comparini, the prohibited +arms, and finally the place where the crime was committed. For +Francesca Pompilia was detained in the home where she was +killed, as a prison. But a response is easy because such circumstances +can indeed somewhat increase the penalty of the principal +in the crime, but not so much as to raise it to the highest +degree, in such a way that Count Guido and his associates should +come to be punished with death. For we find it decided in these +circumstances as quoted by Muta [Citation]: "A decision was +therefore made in view of the case in general, March, 1617, before +his Excellency, wherefrom the ill manner of killing her was +evident; for he had her summoned by her son, and afterward +her body was discovered, which the dogs had eaten outside of +the walls. Leonardus was therefore condemned to the royal +galleys for seven years." And Sanfelici [Citation] says: "And +although some of them were condemned to banishment, it was +because of their mutilation of the privates, a crime for which the +Fisc claimed they ought to be punished by the penalty of the <i>Lex +Cornelia de Sicariis</i>."</p> + +<p>And Matthæus [Citation] says:</p> + +<p>"When the matter had been more carefully considered in the +Council, it was decided that the husband had proceeded too +treacherously in pretending absence, in taking his brother with +him, and in killing with prohibited arms; because merely by +the use of firearms a crime is rendered insidious with us, etc. +And it was accordingly decided that, because of this excess, he +should be condemned to the penalty of exile for four years and +to the payment of 2000 ducats." And this at the stage of appeal +was confirmed [Citation] where we read: "And thus it was +decided in the face of the facts proposed in condemning Francesco +Palomi to the penalty of the galleys for ten years, etc., from the +aggravating qualification of firearms. To the same penalty, +Antonio Alvarez was condemned, who had deliberately killed his +wife because she was playing him false, etc. The penalty was +increased because he was judged to have omitted this earlier, +since he did not complain of mere adultery, but of her living as a +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">141</a></span> +strumpet. And she could not do this without the indifference +and connivance of the husband."</p> + +<p>And our reasoning is manifest, because it cannot be denied that +Count Guido and his associates committed all the aforesaid crimes +on the same ground of injured honour. Because just as this +excuse should be considered sufficient for escaping the ordinary +penalty for murder, so likewise it should be considered sufficient +for avoiding the other punishments whatsoever, appointed in the +Apostolic Constitutions against those committing other crimes +expressed in the same; as the principal purpose of the delinquent +is always to be attended. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>So it was declared on this point for the purpose of avoiding +the penalty inflicted in the 75th Constitution of Sixtus V. +[Citation], against those who assembled armed men, whenever +these men were evidently assembled for the purpose of committing +some other crime, such as breaking prison and freeing +those detained therein. And three very celebrated judges of the +Sacred Court, namely Coccini, Blanchetti, and Orani so decided. +Their decision is included among others gathered by Farinacci +[Citation], and he testifies that it was so decided in the full +chamber, in which the case was proposed and examined at the +order of Clement VIII. of sacred memory.</p> + +<p>Nor does what he wrote later on to the contrary in aid of the +Fisc, of which he was then Advocate, stand in refutation; +Spada. [Citation.] For this opinion of his was refuted clearly +and rejected on the most substantial of reasons and arguments, +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>And in such conditions, for the purpose of avoiding the penalty +of the Banns or Apostolic Constitutions prohibiting the carrying +of arms, I have alleged many authorities in my past argument, +§ <i>neque plures</i> [neque vero], and above the rest, Policardus, etc. +[Citation], who fully examines the matter. My honourable +Procurator of the Poor gathers together others in his present +argument, § <i>remanet tandem</i>. To these I add, Caballus [Citations], +where it says that preparatory acts are to be included with what +was prepared, and he testifies that it was so decided by the +Sacred Council of Naples.</p> + +<p>Likewise, for the purpose of avoiding the penalty set for those +killing one detained in prison, and so remaining in the custody +of the Prince, I have cited many authorities in my past argument, +§ <i>similiter nec aggravari</i>. To these I now add. [Citations.] +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">142</a></span></p> + +<p>Nor does it make any difference that Policardus, in the place +cited, and some of the other authorities recently alleged speak of +homicide committed in a quarrel or for self-defence. For the +attendant circumstance of a quarrel relieves one committing +crime from the ordinary penalty of the crime only in so far as +it overlooks the crime in one who, when provoked, wished +to be avenged (as Ulpian says), and insomuch as one swept +away by a just indignation is not in the fullness of his intellect. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>But both of these reasons without doubt stand in favour +of the husband or of any one else committing murder for +honour's sake [Citation], even if they do so after an interval. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>And in these very conditions, one killing an adulterous +wife after an interval is excused because of just anger, which +causes him not to be in the fullness of his intellect, etc. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Ulpian [Citation] also says: "He ought to be angered with a +wife who has violated his marriage with her, and his wrath should +spring from indignation for contumely when received, and his +nature should arise so that he would drive her from himself in +whatever manner he could." "For it is more difficult to restrain +one's anger than to perform miracles," as St. Gregory says. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>The other authorities, indeed, who speak of persons committing +murder in self-defence with prohibited arms or in prisons +should likewise be in our favour. For the defence of honour in +the case of men of good birth, especially of nobles, is to be +likened to the defence of life itself. [Citations.] And indeed it +surpasses life, according to the words of the Apostle in his first +letter to the Corinthians, chapter 9: "Better were it for me to +die than that any one should deprive me of my glory." And +St. Ambrose: "For who does not consider an injury to the body, +or the loss of patrimony, less than injury to the spirit or the loss +of reputation?" And the third Philippic of Cicero: "We are +born to honour and liberty; either let us keep them, or die with +honour." [Citations.]</p> + +<p>So that he who spurns his own honour, and does not see to +regaining it by vengeance, differs naught from the beasts. +[Citations.] Indeed he should be considered even more irrational +than the very beasts, according to the golden words of Theodoric. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">143</a></span> +as quoted by Cassiodorus, which we have cited in our past argument, +§ <i>Nec verum est</i>. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Then as to the lawsuit going on between Count Guido and the +Comparini as regards the fraud about the birth, beside what was +said recently, I pray that it again be noticed that the Constitution +of Alexander does not enter where some provocation has +arisen from the one injured, as Farinacci well affirms [Citation] +in following a decision of the Rota, which he places at the end of +his counsel. And we have weighed this heretofore in our past +argument, § <i>absque eo quod</i>. Such provocation in the present +case resulted from the injury which the said Comparini inflicted +upon this same Count Guido while the lawsuit was pending, +because of their complicity in the said flight and adultery committed +by their daughter on that occasion.</p> + +<p>The other lawsuit which Francesca Pompilia made pretence of +bringing against Count Guido, for divorce, might be omitted. +For beside the considerations offered by my honoured Procurator +of the Poor in his present argument, § <i>quæ etiam aptantur</i>, this +suit was brought illegally, because the warning of it, as I suppose, +had reached only Abate Paolo, the brother of Count Guido, who +had no authority in this matter. And this is true especially +because it is not proved that the same Guido had any knowledge +of that suit brought, as is now pretended.</p> + +<p>As to Blasio Agostinelli enough has been written in the +former argument, since he has not been examined anew, and in +his former examination he confessed only that he was present +at the said murders, but that he had no hand in them. So the +more rigorous opinion of Caballus cannot apply to him, who +said that such helpers are not immune from the penalty of murder +whenever they kill any one with their own hands. For the +opinion of this author was proved by us to be erroneous, in our +past argument, § <i>quidquid in contrarium</i>.</p> + +<p>I might wish to add something to what has been said in the +past argument as to the alienage and minority of Domenico +and Francesco; but it is not yet very clear under what law +the Fisc pretends that they miss these. Therefore I will rest +satisfied with this response, believing certainly that it will not +chance that my Lord Advocate of the Fisc may fashion his own +allegations and also respond to ours without communicating +them to me, as happened in the past argument very greatly to +the astonishment of myself and of others. For he and I both +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">144</a></span> +ought to seek the truth and to be advocates of that, as both of +us are officers of the Prince according to the considerations of +Rainaldi. [Citation.] Who indeed desires that anything else +than justice be administered, and especially when dealing with +poor imprisoned wretches? In their cause, piety should +triumph, because they are the treasure of Christ. [Citation.]</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Desiderio Spreti</span>, <i>Advocate of the Poor</i>.</p> + +<p class="p6 b1 center"><a name="pamphlet10" id="pamphlet10"></a>AN ACCOUNT OF THE FACTS AND GROUNDS<br /> +OF THE FRANCESCHINI CASE</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">145</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 10.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">The property of Pietro Comparini did not amount to more +than the sum of 10,000 or 12,000 scudi, subject to a reversionary +interest, coupled likewise with the obligation to compound a +good percentage of the income. He, therefore, had to live +sparingly to avoid being reduced to a state of destitution, there +being a bar against his use of the capital and of a part of the +income. He was also too indulgent to his stomach and was +given to laziness, and furthermore had taken a wife with a very +small dowry. Then lawsuits came upon him, the income of his +bonds was reduced, and other misfortunes befell him, so that +he was brought down to a state poor and miserable enough. +So much so that he was several times arrested for debt and, +after making a statement of his property, received from the +Papal Palace secret alms each month.</p> + +<p>When he found himself in such straits, he decided to marry +off Francesca Pompilia, his daughter, to some person who would +undertake the burden of supporting him together with his wife, +Violante Peruzzi, who was a very shrewd woman and of great +loquacity. It was with her advice that he had undertaken the +affair, and the marriage with Count Guido Franceschini was +considered suitable. For when the latter had conducted his +new wife and her parents back to Arezzo, his own country, he +might be able to find some opportune remedy for their necessities, +by the assistance in Rome of Abate Paolo Franceschini his +brother, an active and diligent man; thereby putting in order +the patrimony of Pietro which had been sequestered and tied +up by his creditors. Therefore, when the dowry had been set +at twenty-six bonds, with added hope of future succession to +the rest of his property by virtue of the reversionary interest to +which the wife was entitled, the bargain was accepted. This +bargain was advantageous to Pietro and his wife in freeing them +from the straits in which they found themselves. And it was +likewise advantageous to the Franceschini, as the diligence of +the Abate, and some temporary expenditure by their house well +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">146</a></span> +attests. For they might well believe that they would gain in +time the aforesaid property either entire, or little decreased.</p> + +<p>Such from the beginning were the mutual purposes of that +unhappy marriage. From this fact one may see how slight a +pretext there is for saying that Count Guido, while making the +arrangements, had tricked Pietro and his wife by giving an +inventory of property with an annual income of 1700 scudi, +which income was later proved to be much less, because the +primary end for which the marriage was concluded might very +well have been obtained by showing a much smaller income. +For it is known that when this inventory was shown by Violante +to Pietro Comparini, he said on seeing it: "Ho, ho, it would +have been enough for me if it had been only half as much." +And indeed it would have been the greatest stupidity in Pietro +to have given his daughter a husband, upon the simple inventory +of a foreigner and without finding out if this were true, so that +the real impelling cause of the marriage had been the resources +represented in the said inventory. Not even on the mere +grounds of propriety and civility may Guido be reproved; +because when the said inventory was produced by Pietro in the +trial, the Abate Paolo Franceschini was very much surprised at +it, so that he took his brother to task about it by letter, and +Guido replied that he had done it at the instigation of Violante. +For she desired the completion of the marriage, and, seeing +Pietro irresolute, she induced Guido to give the abovesaid +inventory, with some modifications, for the purpose of stimulating +her husband thereto.</p> + +<p>The marriage was finally effected, and they all went back +together to the city of Arezzo. Nor were the Comparini mistreated +there, as they tried to prove by the unauthoritative +deposition of a servant, who had left the house in anger. One +mere reading of this deposition is enough to assure one that she +did this with a bad motive and at the instigation of others, as +she herself has declared to various persons. This deposition +shows sickeningly the distasteful prejudice with which it was +conceived, and especially where she says that a little sucking +lamb was made to serve as food for seven or eight persons +throughout an entire week. And there are other matters alike +unfit for belief. [The Comparini] were indeed treated with all +consideration and decorum, as Monsignor the Bishop and the +Governor of the city attest; and they are persons much better +qualified to judge and much more worthy of belief than a malign +and suborned servant. But you may also have the attestation +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">147</a></span> +of one who was serving in that household for thirteen months, +during the time when the abovesaid Pietro and Violante were +there, and he is able to tell many particulars of the good treatment +which they received at the hands of the Franceschini.</p> + +<p>It is quite true that disturbances of considerable importance +arose in that household; but they were occasioned by the bitter +tongue of Pietro and the haughtiness of Violante, his wife. For +they laughed at all the proceedings of the Franceschini, and +thrusting themselves forward, with pretence of superiority, +they brought upon the mother of the Franceschini, and upon +the rest of the family, bitter vexations, which were hidden at +the time, to avoid violating the laws of hospitality. And notwithstanding +all this, when Pietro and his wife decided to return +to Rome, as soon as they expressed their wish, they were provided +with money for the journey, and in Rome with furniture +to put in order the house they had left.</p> + +<p>As soon as Pietro and Violante arrived in Rome, a judicial +notice was dispatched at the instance of Pietro, in which he +declared that Francesca Pompilia was not really his daughter, +and that therefore he was not bound to discharge his promise of +dowry. To prove this fact, he brought the attestation of his +wife Violante. In substance, she declared that for the purpose +of keeping her husband's creditors from their rights, by virtue +of the reversionary interest, and also for the purpose of enjoying +the income of the bonds, she had feigned that she was pregnant, +and then, with the aid of a midwife, that she had brought forth +a daughter. This was Francesca Pompilia, who had come of a +most vile parentage.</p> + +<p>From this blameworthy act made public so suddenly throughout +the entire Court, there necessarily arose in the Franceschini +an intense hatred toward the authors of it. But they were able +to restrain themselves from the due resentment in the hope that +if Francesca Pompilia were not indeed the daughter of Pietro +and Violante, as was supposed at the time of the espousal, the +marriage might be annulled and they might thus purge themselves +of such a blot on their reputation. Witnesses of this +feeling of theirs are found in the many authorities and experts +who were requested by the Franceschini to give thought to that +point and to express their opinion of it. But as these did not +agree, the Franceschini were unwilling then to commit themselves +to so doubtful an undertaking, in the prosecution of which +they would necessarily be obliged to presuppose and confess +that she was not the child of the Comparini. But by such a +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">148</a></span> +confession they would be prejudiced in their interest in the dowry. +And therefore they thought well then to pass the matter by that +they might avoid exposing themselves to the danger both of +losing the dowry and of being unable to nullify the marriage.</p> + +<p>Nevertheless they opposed the notice, and obtained for +Francesca Pompilia the continuance in quasi-possession of her +daughtership and a decree for the transfer of the dowry bonds. +But Pietro appealed from the decree, and the case was continued +in the <i>Segnatura di Giustizia</i>. This was followed by the copious +distribution of pamphlets throughout Rome, which had been +printed by Pietro to the very grave injury of the honour of the +Franceschini, not to say to their infamy. But the latter were +able to restrain the just resentment of their irritated minds by +cherishing the hope of making the court acknowledge (as did +follow), no less the falsehood of their adversaries than their own +truth. Supported by this hope, they subsequently bore with +all patience the many insults planned against them by various +cliques, and the twists and turns for hindering the transfer of +the dowry bonds, the Comparini having trumped up various +creditors, whether real or pretended. On account of this +opposition, the Franceschini were made to feel the inconvenience +and expense of that transfer. Nor have they had any benefit +of the income; of which they have been able to obtain not even +a two months' payment.</p> + +<p>To such a pitch had the affairs of the two parties come, when +Guido, waking up one morning, found that his wife was not in +bed. As soon as he arose, he found that his jewel-box had been +rifled and his wife had fled. Nor was the suspicion lacking that +she had given an opiate to Guido and the entire household the +preceding evening; and it was thought that this had happened +at the suggestion of Pietro and Violante, as he had more than +once heard threats of it. He travelled quickly along the way +to Rome, and after a headlong journey he overtook his fugitive +wife, in company with Canon Caponsacchi of Arezzo, at the inn +of Castelnuovo. And as he was alone and unarmed, and they +were armed and resolute, he saw that he was unequal to +avenging that excess. He therefore thought it well to have +them arrested by applying to the authorities of the said place. +The court had both of the fugitives captured by the police. +They were consigned to the jurisdiction of Monsignor the +Governor of Rome, and were then conducted to the New +Prisons.</p> + +<p>The Fisc, indeed, makes much out of the particular that +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">149</a></span> +Franceschini should have avenged his insults in the act of overtaking +them; but, as an adequate response, one should think +of the impossibility of his carrying out his revenge because of +their precaution in the matter of arms, for Franceschini had +heard along the way that the fugitives were travelling armed. +In proof of this, also, when his wife saw her husband she had +the hardihood to thrust at his life with bare sword. For this +reason it was prudent moderation to check their flight then by +arresting them. And this was all the more true because the +adultery of his wife had not then been proved, and possibly he +had a repugnance against imbuing his hands with the blood of +her whom he had often held in his arms, as long as any hope +was left alive of regaining his reputation in any other way than +by her murder.</p> + +<p>But afterward there were found the mutual love-letters of the +same fugitives, barefaced and immodest and preparatory to +flight. And from the cross-examination of the driver it became +evident that during their journey in the carriage they had done +nothing else than kiss each other impurely. And from the +deposition of the host at Castelnuovo, Guido found out that both +of them had slept in the same chamber. Finally, from the +sentence or decree of the court in condemnation of the Canon +Caponsacchi to banishment to Civita Vecchia for three years, +for "having carnally known Francesca," the notoriety and +publicity of this adultery followed. Let any one who has the +sense of honour consider in what straits and perturbations of +mind poor Guido found himself, since even the very reasonless +animals detest and abominate the contamination of their +conjugal tie, with all the ferocity that natural instinct can +suggest. They not only avenge the immodesty of their companions +by the death of the adulterer, but they also avenge the +outrages and injuries done to the reputation of their masters. +For Elian in his Natural History tells of an elephant which +avenged adultery for its master by the death of the wife and the +adulterer found together in the act of adultery. And there are +other examples also, as Tiraquelli cites. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>But returning to the series of events, it must be stated that, +after the imprisonment of the fugitives, Guido also came on to +Rome and was deeply affected and, as it were, delirious because +of the excesses of his wife. He was comforted by his good +friends with the hope that this attempt at flight, taken along +with the lack of decent parentage of Francesca (under supposition +of which he had contracted the marriage) would facilitate +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">150</a></span> +the dissolution of that marriage, and in that way all the blots +upon his reputation would be cancelled. Hence, with this +hope he returned to his own country, leaving the management +of the affair to the Abate, his brother. The Secretary of Sacred +Assembly of the Council may be a witness of this; for Abate +Paolo presented the matter to him and entreated him to propose, +in that sacred assembly, this point of law as to the validity of +the marriage then—that is, after a criminal sentence in the +Tribunal of Monsignor the Governor, had been obtained.</p> + +<p>In the meanwhile the same Abate attended to the plan of +petitioning the conclusion of the said criminal cause. When +Pompilia, to avoid conviction by the love-letters, had recourse +to the falsehood that she did not know how to write, it was +easy for the Abate to convict her of that lie by showing the +marriage agreement signed with her own hand, as well as by a +Cardinal now dead, by means of the recognition of the handwriting. +But in spite of this, when the merits of the case had +been made known everywhere, the same Abate perceived that +instead of his being pitied, little by little every one began to +laugh at him and to deride him, as he has told several persons. +Perchance the attempt was being made to introduce into Rome +the power of sinning against the laws of God with impunity, +along with the doctrine of Molinos and philosophic sin, which +has been checked by the authority of the Holy Office. So +many persons would desire to blot out from the minds of men +their esteem of honour and of reputation in order that they +might sin with impunity against the laws of men and might +give opportunity to adulterers without any check from disgrace +or shame.</p> + +<p>And it is certain that the Abate, seeing the cause unduly +protracted, had just grounds for placing it at the feet of our +Lord [the Pope], with a memorial in which he declared that he +could no longer endure such important and such various litigation +and vexation arising from that luckless marriage, and he +prayed that a special sitting be appointed for all the cases—that +is the ones concerning her daughtership, her flight, her +adultery, the dowry, and others growing out of the marriage +as well as the one concerning its annulling. But he had no +other reply than: "The matter rests with the Judges." So, +with devout resignation to His Holiness, he awaited the outcome +of the said criminal trial, from which he hoped to regain, +at least in part, the reputation of his house.</p> + +<p>In the meantime, Pietro Comparini was supplied with plenty +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">151</a></span> +of money by the generosity of some unknown person, possibly +a lover of the young girl. He vaunted his triumph boldly in +the throngs and the shops, places of his accustomed resort, and +he praised the resolution and spirit of his daughter for having +known how to trick the Franceschini with a disgraceful flight +and with the thievery of such precious things, and for having +found an expedient to give to the judge in the trial such good +replies with all details thereof. He also boasted that in a little +while she would return to his home despite the Franceschini. +For he would bring so many lawsuits and scandals upon them +that they would be forced to be silent and to let matters run on. +For these statements we can have the attestations of many +persons, in case they are needed. Therefore, because of such +stinging boasts and such irritations, the mind of Guido was ever +more embittered in spite of all the power he could master for +restraining the impetus of his anger which had been provoked +by such injuries.</p> + +<p>Francesca Pompilia had been previously transferred from the +prisons into the Refuge called <i>della Scalette</i>, where she stayed +for some months. Then it was discovered that she was +pregnant, and many attempts were made to secure an abortion. +For this purpose, powders and other drugs were given several +times by the mother. As this proved useless, she was remanded +to the home of Pietro and Violante on the pretext of an +obstruction and the necessity of relieving herself. There, at the +approach of the physicians, her pregnancy was discovered. The +truth is, that when her womb began to grow, the nuns did not +wish for her confinement to take place within their walls, and +therefore a pretext was found for removing her on the grounds +of the said obstruction and the necessity of removing it.</p> + +<p>Now at this point the Abate found it necessary to break +the bonds of his forbearance: for although it was indirectly +that he was offended, that is, in the person and honour of his +brother, nevertheless it seemed to him that every man's face +had become a looking-glass, in which was mirrored the image +of the ridicule of his house. Therefore, being humiliated, though +he was strong and constant in other matters, he often burst into +bitterest tears, until he felt very much inclined to throw himself +into the river, as he indeed declared to all his friends. And to +free himself from such imminent danger, he decided to abandon +Rome, the Court, his hopes and possessions, his affectionate and +powerful patrons, and whatever property he had accumulated +during thirty years in the same City. Any one may imagine with +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">152</a></span> +what pain he parted from these and went to a strange and unknown +clime, where he would not meet the fierceness of his +scorners, who had been merited neither by himself nor his household.</p> + +<p>But the injury of Guido, arising from a sharper and severer +wound, within his very vitals as a husband, had the power to +arouse his anger even to the extreme. Nor did he consider it +sufficient redress to punish himself with voluntary exile for the +crimes of others; for such a resolution might be considered by +the world as a plain proof of his weakness and cowardice. He +soon had sure information that, during the month of December, +Pompilia had given birth to a boy in the home of the Comparini, +which child had been intrusted secretly to a nurse. He also +heard that the infamy of the friendship with the said Canon had +been continued, inasmuch as he was received as a guest into the +said home (as was said). For like a vulture, Caponsacchi +wheeled round and round those walls, that he might put beak +and talons into the desired flesh for the increase of Guido's disgrace. +Guido accordingly felt the wildest commotion in his +blood, which urged him to find refuge for himself even in the most +desperate of determinations.</p> + +<p>In the meantime he turned over again and again, as in +delirium, his sinister thoughts, reflecting that he was abhorred +by his friends, avoided by his relatives, and pointed at with the +finger of scorn by every one in his own country. And the word +went abroad that in Rome they were selling his reputation at an +infamous market. (This matter has moved the treasurer of the +Convertites, since the death of Pompilia, to begin proceedings +and to take possession of her property.) Added to the above +were the continual rebukes which he received because of his lost +honour, so that he became utterly drunk with fury. He left +Arezzo with desperate thoughts, and when he had reached Rome +he went to that home which was the asylum of his disgraces. +Nor could he have any doubt how much the very name of the +adulterer was respected; for when Guido made pretence of delivering +a letter of his sending, the doors were immediately thrown +open; and so, scarcely had he set his foot upon the threshold, +before he saw his dishonour proving itself before his very face; of +which dishonour he had heretofore had only a distant impression +in his imagination. Then bold and triumphant, he no longer +feared to upbraid her with unmasked face for all the insults +which had been inflicted upon his honour in that household; and +as he looked all around at those walls incrusted with his heaviest +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">153</a></span> +insults, and with his infamy, the dams of his reason gave way +and he fell headlong into that miserable ruin of plunging himself +with deadly catastrophe into the blood of the oppressors of his +reputation.</p> + +<p>There is no doubt that Franceschini has committed the crime +of a desperate man, and that his mind, when it was so furious, +was totally destitute of reason. As he had lost his property, his +wife, and his honour, there was nothing else for him to lose unless +it were his miserable life. For, as Paolo Zacchia, the learned +philosopher and jurist, says in speaking of anger in man: "Such +and so great is its force that it does not differ at all from insanity +and fury." Galenus very clearly affirms this, adding that when +in law it is known that crimes are committed in such a state, +they are punished with a smaller penalty, even though it has to +do with the very atrocious crime of parricide. Calder [Citation] +also gives many other matters on our point in No. 27 and the +following numbers. And these theoretic propositions are verified +in actual practice in Guido; for he was so utterly mad and void of +reason that he entered upon so great an undertaking even at an +hour of the night when many people were around. And after +that he took no precaution, such as any other person of sound +mind would have taken in governing his actions. He set out by +the high road on his journey of about seventy miles from the +outskirts of the city without providing any vehicles, as if he +were merely a traveller leaving Rome. These circumstances are +plain evidences of an offended and delirious mind. [Citations.] +St. Jerome writes in his letters:</p> + +<p>"Where honour is absent, there is contempt; and where contempt +is, there is recurring insult; and where insult, there +indignation; and where indignation, there is no quiet; and +where quiet is wanting, there the mind is often thrown from its +balance."</p> + +<p>Nor in this case does the legal distinction enter as to whether +the one driven by anger committed the crime in the first impulse +of anger, or after an interval of time. For this distinction might +have a place when the anger arose from an insult in some +transitory deed, and one that was not permanent. But in the +case we are treating, the insult provocative of anger consisted of +frequent and reiterated acts; that is, not so much in the passing +of the wife from the nunnery to the home of Pietro under an +empty and ridiculous pretence, but still more from her staying in +the said home with the aggravating circumstance of his own +infamy (as has been said above). Accordingly, as the injury is +permanent because of the continual affronts which the injured +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">154</a></span> +one received, so the vengeance is understood to be taken immediately +and without any interval. This the defenders of the +cause have sufficiently proved in their no less erudite than +learned writings with their very strong arguments and their +unsurpassable learning.</p> + +<p>Nor does it amount to anything for one to say that the crime +was aggravated, first, by the kind of arms used; for Virgil [A. I. +150] says: <i>Furor arma ministrat</i>; nor, secondly, by the company +of four, or let us say the conventicle; nor, thirdly, by the place, +the excess, or the other circumstances considered by the Fisc. +For in a madman, everything is excusable, as it is axiomatic and +a very sure principle that nature then arises in such a way that +it drives a man from himself, in whatever manner is possible, etc. +In conformity therewith, Fracosto speaks as follows: "And in +truth an ingenuous mind, and one that knows the value of its +own honour and reputation, is very painfully offended in a part +so sensitive and so delicate; and at such a time reaches the limit +of madness and of desperation; for it has lost the light of reason, +and in delirium and frenzy cannot be satisfied even if it succeed +in turning upside down, if that were possible, the very hinges of +the Universe, for the purpose of annihilating not merely the +authors but the places and the memory of its insults and shames. +For "the rage and fury of a man does not spare in the day of +vengeance, nor does it grant the prayers of any, nor does it accept +in requital many gifts," as the Holy Spirit speaks on this point, +through the mouth of Solomon, in the sixth chapter of Proverbs, +at the end. With this very well agrees what St. Bernard has +very learnedly written in his letter to his nephew Robert at the +beginning: "Anger indeed does not deliberate very much, nor +has it a sense of shame, nor does it follow reason, nor fear the +loss of dignity, nor obey the law, nor acquiesce in its judgment, +and ignores all method and order."</p> + +<p>There is no doubt that Samson reached this pitch when he fell +into the power of his enemies. He suffered with an intrepid +mind the loss of his eyes and other grievous disasters, but when +he saw that he was destined to serve as a pastime in public places, +and when he there heard the jeers and derision of the people, the +anger in his breast was inflamed, so that, all madness and fury, +he cried out: "Let me die along with the Philistines." And +giving a shake to the columns which sustained the palace he +reduced it to ruin: "And he killed many more in his death than +he had killed while alive," as the Holy Scripture testifies. And +Christ himself, although he was very mild, and had the greatest +patience while receiving opprobrium and insults without ever +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">155</a></span> +complaining, yet answered, when he knew that his honour was +touched, "My honour I will give to no one." And it is certain +that any one who cares for honour and reputation would rather +die an honoured man beneath <i>mannaia</i> than live for many ages +in the face of the world with shame and dishonour.</p> + +<p>This argument, strong as it is, has succeeded in weakening one +wise and earnest adherent of the Fisc. And this is why the very +learned pen of Monsignor of the Fisc has uttered the following +period, which says:</p> + +<p>"But because the Comparini claimed that the furnishing of +food to Francesca while in prison was the duty of Franceschini, +and the latter declared that it belonged to the Comparini, the +Most Illustrious and Reverend Lord Governor, after having the +consent of Abate Paolo, own brother of Guido, and his representative +in the case, assigned the home of the same Comparini +to Francesca as a safe and secure prison under security." But +this fact can be clearly explained so that it will not form an +objection.</p> + +<p>When Francesca Pompilia was about to be taken from the +prison to the nunnery, Abate Franceschini was asked to provide +the food, with the statement that if he refused there would +appear a third and unknown person who would assume the +burden of it to their dishonour. Therefore the Abate wished +once for all to put an end to any chance of receiving new insults; +and to avoid every charge of preserving even the slightest sign +of relation with this disgraceful sister-in-law, accepted a middle +way proposed to him, namely, that Lamparelli, as Procurator +of Charity, should make provision for it by the disbursement of +his own funds and should pay it back again by what reasonably +belonged to the Franceschini; for he reimbursed himself for it +with the money which had been found upon the fugitives, and +which had been stolen from the husband; at her capture, this +money was placed on deposit in the office, where there remained +so much of it still that, after all was over, the balance of it was +consigned to the same Abate.</p> + +<p>And as when the said Francesca was transferred from the +nunnery to the home of Violante, all the preceding and succeeding +circumstances made it very improbable that the Abate gave +his consent, and as this consent is not found registered among +those acts, it seems very clear that it was not given at all. Nor +could he legally give it, for he was not the representative of his +brother in that matter; for his authorisation confined him solely +to the power of receiving back the money and other things +which were deposited in the office. This is proved by his acts +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">156</a></span> +and by the story which the Abate then gave to his friends and +relatives; and it utterly destroys the assertion of the Fisc, since +Abate Paolo says that he was indeed notified that the young +woman was obliged to find relief in an indisposition, certified by +a physician, and that she was obliged to leave the nunnery and +to go back to her father's home. To this, as it seemed a mere +pretence, he replied that he could easily undertake to purge the +wife in the nunnery without exposing her to such evident danger +of greater shame. He also said that he wondered very much +that the affection of a father had so suddenly returned in Pietro +Comparini for Pompilia, whom he and his wife had so often +denied as their daughter. He wondered how they could both +be, and not be, the parents of the said woman, according to +their own desires to the injury of the house of Franceschini.</p> + +<p>And if the solicitor, for the purpose of giving colour to the +honour of the said lady, has falsely urged many justifications, +it is to be noted that in substance all that he says on that point +is founded on what with her own mouth she has said in her own +favour and what she has proffered to free herself from the blame +of her sins, both at this juncture and in the flight, as well as in +the trial which may be referred to; in fact, quite the contrary +is evident; and from the external tests which the Convertites +intended to make, but from which they abstained when they +heard the news of the birth of the son. And would that it had +pleased God that she had observed the laws of holy modesty! +for in that case so great a misfortune would not have resulted +from her whims. We should notice, further, that the declaration +made by the wife in the face of death may be doubtful in +itself, in the sense that after confession and absolution one's +sin is cancelled as if it had never been committed, so that in a +court of justice she would no longer have any need of pardon. +Therefore, from the above-cited circumstances and very strong +reasons, there is no room to doubt that Franceschini deserves +the indulgence which the laws give to excesses that find origin +from the stings of honour. And, if we were within the circumstances +under which the case ought to be adjudged according +to expediency, without any hesitation, Franceschini should be +punished mildly to diminish the force of immodesty and +impudence. For the woman is not without adherents, who +triumph throughout all Rome in a coterie of treachery, both +in public and in private. This is for the oppression and derision +against husbands who have regard for their reputation. And +they give the title of pedantry to that circumspection which one +ought to practise for the preservation of his own honour. +</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft11" id="ft11">File-title of Pamphlet 11.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor of the<br /> +City in Criminal Cases:</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE<br /> +with qualifying circumstance.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For the Fisc, against Count Guido Franceschini<br /> +and his Associates.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Summary.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6"><a name="pamphlet11" id="pamphlet11"></a>SUMMARY</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">159</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 11.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><a name="proc2_1" id="proc2_1"></a>No. 1.—<i>Bond given by Francesca Pompilia to keep her home as +a prison.</i></p> + +<p class="right">October 12, 1697.</p> + +<p>Before me, etc., Francesca Pompilia, wife of Guido Franceschini +of Arezzo, was placed at liberty, etc., and promised, etc., +to keep to this home of Pietro (son of the former Francesco +Comparini), etc., situated in Via Paolina, as a safe and secure +prison, and not to leave it, either by day or by night, nor to +show herself at the doors or open windows, under any pretext +whatsoever, etc., with the thought of having to return again to +prison, etc. And after she has recovered her health to present +herself at any time whatsoever, etc., at every command of the +Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord Governor of the City; +for the cause concerning which there was argument in the trial, +etc., from proofs that may arise, whether new or not new; under +the penalty of 300 scudi, laid by the Reverend Apostolic +Chamber in the case, etc.</p> + +<p>This is followed by the surety in due form,</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Notary for the Poor.</span></p> + +<p class="center p2"><a name="proc2_2" id="proc2_2">No. 2</a>.—<i>Certificate of the Baptism of Francesca Pompilia.</i></p> + +<p>I, the undersigned, certify, etc., as is found in the baptismal +record, page 152, the particulars given below, namely:</p> + +<p>July 23, 1680. I, Bartolomeo Mini, curate, have baptised the +infant daughter born on the 17th of this month to Pietro +Comparini and Violante Peruzzi, who live in this parish. To +her the following name was given: Francesca Camilla Vittoria +Angela Pompilia, etc. In pledge of which, etc.</p> + +<p>Rome this 9th day of February, 1698.</p> + +<p>Thus it is, Pietro Ottoboni, Curate of San Lorenzo in Lucina. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">160</a></span></p> + +<p class="p2 center"><a name="proc2_3" id="proc2_3">No. 3</a>.—<i>Letter of Francesca, Pompilia, written in the prison of +Castelnuovo to her parents.</i></p> + +<p>My dear Father and Mother:</p> + +<p>I wish to inform you that I am imprisoned here in Castelnuovo +for having fled from home with a gentleman with whom you are +not acquainted. But he is a relative of the Guillichini, who was +at Rome, and who was to have accompanied me to Rome. As +Guillichini was sick, and could not come with me, the other +gentleman came, and I came with him for this reason, because +my life was not worth an hour's purchase. For Guido my +husband wished to kill me, because he had certain suspicions, +which were not true, and on account of these he wished to +murder me. I sent you word of them on purpose, but you did +not believe the letters sent you were in my own hand. But I +declare that I finished learning how to write in Arezzo. Let me +tell you that the one who carries this was moved by pity and +provided me with the paper and what I needed. So as soon as +you have read this letter of mine come here to Castelnuovo to +give me some aid, because my husband is doing all he can against +me. Therefore if you wish your daughter well, come quickly. +I stop because I have no more time. May 3.</p> + +<p>Directed to Signor Pietro Comparini, my father, Via Vittoria, +Rome.</p> + +<p class="center p2"><a name="proc2_4" id="proc2_4">No. 4</a>.—<i>Another letter of the same person, in which she calls +the Canon to task for dishonourable advances.</i></p> + +<p>I give you infinite thanks for the octaves which you have +sent me. All of these are the very contrary of the Rosalinda, +which was as honourable as these are immodest. And I am +surprised that you who are so chaste have composed and copied +matters so immodest. I do not want you to do in everything +as you have done in these books, the first of which was so very +nice; while these octaves are quite the contrary. I cannot +believe that you, who were so modest, would become so bold, etc.</p> + +<p class="center p2"><a name="proc2_5" id="proc2_5">No. 5</a>.—<i>Portions of the will of Pietro Comparini.</i></p> + +<p>As to each and all of my properties, etc., I appoint, as my +usufructuary heir, my wife Signora Violante Peruzzi, etc. And +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">161</a></span> +when she dies I appoint in her stead, in the said usufruct of my +entire estate, Francesca Pompilia, wife of Signor Guido Franceschini +of Arezzo. And I do so because of her good character and +because for a long time, yes, for many years, I looked upon her +in good faith as my daughter, and thought that Signora Violante, +my wife and myself were her parents. Then I found out that +both she and I were tricked in that belief, thanks to the vanity +of the schemes, unfortunately conceived by my said wife, to +make me believe in the birth of the same daughter. And +because of a scruple of conscience after the marriage of Francesca +Pompilia, this fact was revealed to me by Signora Violante my +wife. And this pretence of birth was found by me to be a fact +because of the information of it from persons worthy of credit.</p> + +<p>All this I grant, therefore, on the condition that the said +Francesca Pompilia seek again her own city and stay here in +Rome, etc., in which city I hope she will live chastely and +honestly, and will lead the life of a good Christian. But if she +do not come back to this city, or if when she has come back she +live with shameless impurity (and may God forbid that), I wish +that she be deprived of the said usufruct of my estate and that +opportunity be given for a substitution in favour of the heir +mentioned below, as proprietor, etc. Because thus, etc., and +not otherwise, etc. And because the chance might arise that +she be left a widow, or that her marriage be dissolved, since a +lawsuit is going on, which was brought before Monsignor Tomati +by the Olivieri as to her relation as child, and if the said Francesca +wish to marry again, or become a nun, I am willing that she +separate from my estate as much as 1000 scudi for the purpose +of remarrying or becoming a nun, if she shall so please. And I +advise her not to marry again, lest she subject herself a second +time to other deceptions. Still further, I give her the power to +leave by will 200 scudi more of my estate. And in the event +that Signor Guido die first, whereby there would come about the +restitution to the said Francesca Pompilia, etc., of the money +received by Signor Guido, to the sum of about 700 scudi, etc. +(which I think would be at least very difficult, if not impossible, +because Signor Guido is wretchedly poor and his family is very +poor), I wish that these moneys be not counted against the said +Francesca Pompilia in said 1000 scudi, much less in her power +of making a will, because then, etc. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">162</a></span></p> + +<p class="center p2"><a name="proc2_6" id="proc2_6">No. 6</a>.—<i>Authorisation for the management of his affairs made by +Guido Franceschini to the person of Abate Paolo, his brother.</i></p> + +<p class="right"> +<i>October 7, 1694.</i></p> + +<p>Guido, son of the former Tomaso di Franceschini of Arezzo, +of his own will, etc., made and appointed, etc., to be his true, +etc., representative, etc., special and general, etc., Abate Paolo +Franceschini, his own brother, now living in Rome, etc., for the +purpose of carrying on and defending, in the name of the said +Constituent, all lawsuits and causes, civil or mixed, already +brought or to be brought for any reason whatsoever, and against +any persons whatsoever, anywhere, and especially in Rome, +whether as plaintiff or defendant before any judge, either +ecclesiastical or secular, whether before the Congregation or +Tribunal, and before one or both, to give or receive charges, or +to contest lawsuits, to take oath as regards the calumny, and to +furnish whatever other testimony is lawful, etc., and to carry +on and obtain each and all other necessary matters, in the same +manner and form as the Constituent could, if he were present, +and as seems well pleasing to the said Procurator, etc., promising, +etc., and demanding, etc.</p> + +<p>I, Joseph, etc., de Ricii, Notary Public, etc., of Arezzo was +asked, etc., in pledge whereto, etc. +</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft12" id="ft12">File-title of Pamphlet 12.</a>]</p> + +<hr class="l50" /> + +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor of the<br /> +City in Criminal Cases:</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For the Fisc, against Count Guido Franceschini<br /> +and his Associates, Prisoners.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Response of The Procurator General<br /> +of the Fisc.</i></p> + +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> + +<hr class="l50" /> + +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA EXCIDII<a name="pamphlet12" id="pamphlet12"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">165</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 12.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord:</p> + +<p>Why should we waste time in disputing the point whether +adultery committed by Francesca Comparini with Canon Caponsacchi, +as is claimed by the other side, is sufficiently proved? +For in our first information [<a href="#pamphlet5">Pamphlet 5</a>] as to the law and fact +in the case, we have already declared that judgment was given +in the <i>Congregation</i> only for the penalty of banishment to Civita +Vecchia against the abovesaid Canon, and of retention in the +nunnery against Francesca, because of the very lack of proof of +the said adultery. And this is quite right in law, because neither +the Canon himself nor the said Francesca have confessed, much +less been convicted of it; and because the suppositions brought +on the other side are trivial and equivocal. But, even if these +latter had been weighty and very urgent, they would not have +been enough to establish conclusive proof, but at the most could +only lead the mind of the judge to place some minor punishment +upon them arbitrarily, as Farinacci testifies. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Therefore there should be strict insistence on behalf of the +Fisc upon the point that Guido Franceschini had not the right +to kill, after an interval, his wife, whom he had not taken in +adultery nor in base conduct, without incurring the ordinary +penalty of the <i>Lex Cornelia de Sicariis</i>. For in our former +writings, § <i>Alii vero</i>, we have proved by the strength of many +distinguished authorities that a husband who kills his wife after +an interval is not excused from the said penalty.</p> + +<p>Now that this fundamental assertion [in their argument] is +overthrown, we declare that the rights of the Fisc cannot at all +be controverted in the case with which we are dealing, since the +authorities alleged by the Defence, who excuse a husband from +the ordinary penalty, speak in the case of simple murder; and +they ought not, accordingly, to be extended to a case made +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">166</a></span> +still graver by qualifying attendant circumstances. And +for this reason, because the penalty cannot possibly be the +same, when the crime is greater in the one case than in the other. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor for the purpose of overthrowing this fundamental idea of +the Fisc can the objection be made that all the qualifying and +attendant circumstances, which have been brought together in +behalf of the Fisc, should have no consideration, because they +tend toward and are preordained for the end had in mind; for +the end and intention of Count Guido was directed toward the +murder of his wife and the vindication of his honour. But one +can well understand how fallacious this argument really is, from +what I have already written in § <i>Prima enim</i> together with the +one following, and § <i>secunda qualitas</i> and <i>si ergo</i>. There we +have proved that the learned authorities who can be adduced +by the other side speak and should be so understood when the +end is licit and not prohibited by law, or else when some qualifying +circumstance, through the force of particular Constitutions +or Banns, does not establish some further capital crime, distinct +and separate. And this is true whether the preordained end in +the mind of the delinquent follow or do not follow.</p> + +<p>But in our case, from what has been conceded by the lawyers +for the Defence, the husband is not permitted by law to kill +with impunity his wife, after an interval, for adultery. But +he is permitted by law to slay the vile adulterer and his adulterous +wife only when taken in adultery. How then can these +authorities be applied to our case? For they hold good and find +a place for themselves only in a case permitted by law. In these +circumstances speaks Laurentius Matthæus [Citation], who is +cited by the other side, where in his setting forth a case we may +read: "The adulterer and adulteress were slain in the home of +the husband, although in that case the husband did not escape +unpunished, because he had used firearms."</p> + +<p>Nor does it hold good in law and practice that the bearing of +arms is included along with the crime committed. Not in law, +as we have affirmed in our other argument § <i>si ergo</i>; nor in +practice, because in all the tribunals of the entire Ecclesiastical +State, it is held that even when murder in a rage has been committed, +if it has been committed with the arms which are prohibited +under the capital penalty, especially if these arms come +into the possession of the Court, a more severe penalty is inflicted. +And murders which should suffer a lighter penalty because they +were done in anger are condemned under the ordinary penalty +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">167</a></span> +because of the carrying of such arms. Farinacci and Guazzini +testify that this has been the practice in the Ecclesiastical State +while this Decree has held good. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Still less applicable are the other authorities, who were adduced +to escape the order of the Constitution of Alexander. For +although it is true that for this crime the penalty threatened by +the same decree does not enter, unless these three matters are +concurrently present, namely craft, the occasion of a lawsuit, +and the fact that no provocation has arisen (as Farinacci holds +[Citation]), yet in our case, all of the abovesaid concur. As to +the craft, there can be little doubt, since by the very confession of +the Defendants we have knowledge of the preceding discussion +and deliberation for committing the murders. And Decian and +others affirm the charge of craft may arise from such a discussion. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>The presence of a lawsuit is likewise undoubted; because, on +the representation of Pietro Comparini, suit was not only brought +before Judge Tomati as to the dowry promised and the goods +subject to entail, for the exclusion of the said Guido Franceschini +and Francesca his wife, but also a sentence favourable to +the said Franceschini has been handed down by the same +judge.</p> + +<p>But still further we may gather, from the confession of Franceschini +himself, that the provocation whereby he was moved to +kill his wife arose because of the pretended adultery; on this +point the counsel for the defence have principally insisted. Nor +can they deny that this same cause was introduced in the +criminal prosecution in the presence of the judge by the same +Franceschini. It is quite necessary, then, to acknowledge that +this ought to justify the application of the penalty of the +Alexandrian Bull; for this decree speaks in civil as well as +criminal cases, as is evident in the fourth paragraph of the same +Bull, where we read: "That successively in future times forever, +each and all persons, ecclesiastical and secular, of whatever +quality, dignity, state and grade of rank and prominence, in their +own causes under benefit of clergy or secular, also in criminal +and mixed cases, whether now before this Court or pending for +the time, their adversaries, or those following or helping them, +or the Advocates or Counsel of them." And also in the place +where we read: "If mutilation of limb, or death (which God +avert) follow, they incur <i>ipso facto</i> beside the loss of their right +and case, the sentence for the outraged majesty of the +Law." +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">168</a></span></p> + +<p>We believe we have sufficiently canvassed these matters with +galloping pen (there being but a brief three hours) to prove +clearly that the foundations of the Fisc affirmed in our former +writings still stand fast, in spite of what has been recently +deduced by the opposition so fully and so learnedly, but without +legitimate proof.</p> + +<p class="left45 center"> +<span class="smcap">F. Gambi</span>,<br /> +<i>Procurator General of the Fisc and of the<br /> +Reverend Apostolic Chamber</i>.</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft13" id="ft13">File-title of Pamphlet 13.</a>]</p> + +<hr class="l50" /> + +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor of the<br /> +City in Criminal Cases</i>:</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE<br /> +with qualifying circumstance</i>.</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For the Fisc, against Count Guido Franceschini<br /> +and his Associates.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>A reply in matters of law, by the Lord<br /> +Advocate of the Fisc.</i></p> + +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> + +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA HOMICIDIORUM<a name="pamphlet13" id="pamphlet13"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">171</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 13.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord:</p> + +<p>In the beginning of his recent information, my Lord Advocate +of the Poor has criticised as unjust the decree of this Supreme +Tribunal, which inflicted the torture of the vigil upon Count +Guido Franceschini and his associates, for the purpose of getting +confession of that most horrible crime committed by them. +Hence he claims that those confessions, given under the fear of +it and ratified after it was over (as is the custom), cannot do the +Accused any harm. He attempts, indeed, to deny the justice +of the said decree, not merely because of the absence of the +quality of special atrocity (as required by the decree of Paul V. +of sacred memory for the reformation of the tribunals of the City), +but also from the fact that the death penalty cannot be demanded +for the crime under discussion. And this he claims is +so (in spite of the unusual powers for ordering the torture of the +vigil granted to this Tribunal) lest there may be greater harshness +in the course of the trial than in the penalty itself. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>In the end of this said recent information, he also criticises me +because, to the very great wonder of himself and others, I have +failed in my duty of seeking the truth in that I have made +certain allegations in the defence of the rights of the Fisc, which +I have not communicated to him. I thought he had complained +quite enough about that orally, so that he might have spared us +his new complaint. But it was not my duty to tell them to him, +just as his informations, which he made for the Defence (very +learned indeed in their way), have never been made known to +me by him. But I assert only this, that I have paid the price of +much labour, lest I may seem to have failed in my office and in +the reverence with which I attend upon my Lord.</p> + +<p>Passing over, therefore, my own personal apology, I go on to +vindicate the decree of this Tribunal from the injustice charged +against it. I also omit proof of the quality of the crime as to +whether it may be considered very atrocious, for I have abundantly +argued this point in my past response, § <i>Sed quatenus</i> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">172</a></span> +<i>etiam</i>, with the one following. For I showed that this quality +could be sustained because of the attendant circumstances which +exasperated and raised the crime to the outraging of the majesty +of the law, according to the provisions of the Apostolic Constitutions +and the General Banns. I think it is quite enough in my +present argument to show that for this offence the death penalty +should be demanded. I hope to accomplish this with little +difficulty, since from the very kind of severe torture decreed, by +judges of such integrity, the applicability of this said penalty is +pre-supposed. And so since nothing new, whether in fact or in +law, can be brought, which has not been already examined in +relation to the cause for decreeing the torture, now that the confession +of the Accused has followed it, it is the duty of the Judges +to pronounce the execution of the well-deserved penalty, which +has been long expected by every one.</p> + +<p>I have said that nothing new is brought by the defence, since +their special attempt consists in repeating the plea of injured +honour because of the pretended adultery committed by the wife +of Guido, with the help and conspiracy of her parents, who were +barbarously slaughtered along with her. This plea is offered for +the purpose of exciting the pity of my Most Illustrious Lord, and +the Lords Judges, in order that Guido and his associates may be +punished more mildly, according to the authorities adduced on +that point in their first information, § <i>hoc stante</i>, together with the +one following, and § <i>Prædictis nullatenus</i>, likewise with the one +following; and in the present information, § <i>Verum et socios</i>. +But the same response recurs, that for the Accused this exception +on the plea of pretended injury to honour can afford no refuge, +because this plea has no foundation in fact and is irrelevant in +law.</p> + +<p>For what difference does it make even if the mere strong suspicion +of adultery is enough to excuse vengeance taken immediately +by a husband against his wife or her lover? If she were +found either in lustful acts, or in those preparatory thereto; +then because of such a sudden grievance excited thereby, which +provokes a man to anger, the penalty should very often be +tempered according to the nature of the case and the persons. +But it is quite certain that to escape the ordinary penalty of the +<i>Lex Cornelia de Sicariis</i> for the murder of a wife committed after +an interval, the mere suspicion of adultery, however strong, is +not enough; but the clearest proof of it is required, either from +the confession of the wife herself or from a condemnatory +sentence following. [Citations.] +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">173</a></span></p> + +<p>But such proof is entirely lacking in our case. For the luckless +wife constantly denied the adultery even till the last breath of +her life, as is evident from the sworn attestations of priests and +others who gladly ministered to her after she had been wounded. +For they unanimously assert that she always affirmed that she +had never violated her conjugal faith. Nor did she ask that such +sin be forgiven her by the Divine Clemency; this assertion indeed +should have much weight, since no one is presumed to die unmindful +of his eternal safety. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor are the responses given by the Defence at all relevant; +namely, that such proof in denial of the adultery is drawn +entirely from testimony taken out of court, and extorted by the +heir while a lawsuit was pending, to remove the annoyances +brought by the Monastery of the Convertites, and that some of +the undersigned were legatees. They also respond that since +such an assertion as hers served to cover her own baseness, it +should not be believed, especially as it was not sworn. And +further, that although no one is presumed to be unmindful of his +eternal safety, yet all are not supposed to be immune from sin, +like Saint John the Baptist, which is especially true when the +argument is about the prejudice of a third party and about the +more severe punishment of an enemy of the one making declaration.</p> + +<p>Now that all these claims are destroyed with so little trouble, +the irregularity of the proof could stand in our way, if the Fisc +were obliged to assume proof and perfect it. But the burden of +proof rests upon the Accused, according to the authorities cited +above for avoiding the death penalty, whenever a man kills his +wife after an interval. The above attestations are brought +merely to damage the proof of pretended adultery, offered by +Guido. In this case, certainly, such attestations are not to be +spurned, especially when we consider the quality of the persons +attesting, since they are priests of well-known probity, and it is +incredible that they would be willing to lie. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>The further objection that these attestations were extorted +by the heir, while a lawsuit was pending, for the purpose of +escaping the trouble brought upon him by the Monastery of the +Convertites, is also removed by the same reply; because when +one is arguing for the proof of an assertion given in the last days +of life and in the very face of death, proof cannot be established, +unless this hold good. And the heir is praiseworthy, because he +is obliged to avenge the murder of the one slain, lest he be +considered unworthy according to the text. [Citation.] "Heirs +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">174</a></span> +who are proved to let the murder of the testator go unavenged +are compelled to give back the entire property," etc. He procured +these attestations that he might guard the good fame of +the testatrix; and this was rather because of his zeal for her good +repute than to prevent the annoyances unjustly brought, and the +quashing of these latter could be turned back for the exclusion +of the pretended proof of the dishonesty of the unfortunate wife.</p> + +<p>Still less can it stand in our way that some of the signers are +legatees, since their interest is not large enough to prevent their +giving testimony. [Citations.] And this is especially true +when one is arguing to prove a matter which happened within +the walls of a home, and the proof of which, on that account, is +considered difficult. [Citations.] And such an exception to +their testimony, so far as it has any foundation, is utterly removed +by the number of the witnesses subscribed to the said +attestations. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But [last of all], as to the objection that the assertion of one +dying is not to be attended, when directed toward the exoneration +of one's self, because no one is compelled to reveal his own +baseness. This might indeed hold good if the adultery had been +proved, and if it were not evident that, though wounded, she had +died with strongest manifestation of Christian penitence, which +would exclude all suspicion of a lie. In this case such an objection +does not hold good, but another very valid supposition takes +its place, namely, that no one is believed to be willing to die +unmindful of his eternal safety. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>For Mascardus [Citation.] says that a confession given in the +hour of death holds good, and he adds that this approaches +nearer the truth, and cites in proof of it Marsilius. [Citation.] +The latter affirms that if any one assert that a person making +oath in the hour of death is lying, he says what is improbable. +And Mascardus concludes that this opinion is more just, and +more in accord with reason and with natural law. And though +he offers some limitations, none of these are applicable to our +case; and the question about which he was arguing was concerning +the assertion of one wounded, as to whether such assertion +constituted proof against the one charged; and this differs by +the whole heaven from our dispute, if we only note that the +burden of proof does not rest with the Fisc. Nor does the +assertion of Pompilia when dying tend principally toward +vengeance, since it is quite evident from those making attestations +that she shrank with horror from that; as she always +professed that she most freely pardoned her husband. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">175</a></span></p> + +<p>These matters we have noted beforehand rather in super-abundance +than because we were obliged to assert the justice +of the decree of this Tribunal. It will now be easy to escape +the proof of pretended adultery, brought by the counsel for the +Defence. For so far as this proof is drawn from the other decree +of this same Tribunal, condemning Canon Caponsacchi for flight +and carnal knowledge with Francesca Pompilia, the response +which has already been given holds good: namely, that a title +should be given no attention, but merely the proof resulting +from the trial, and the penalty imposed by the sentence. And +what if in that decree, along with the "title" of "complicity +in the flight and escape of Francesca Pompilia," there was also +added the title "for criminal knowledge of the same"? Yet +since in the trial itself no proof in verification of this was found, +and since the penalty of three years' banishment does not +correspond therewith, the mere title should not be given attention, +according to the authorities adduced in my past response, +§ <i>non relevante</i>.</p> + +<p>And on account of the following reason, still less can such clear +proof of the pretended adultery be established as is required +to escape the ordinary penalty for taking vengeance after an +interval. For at the instance of the Procurator of the Poor a +correction was decreed by the Judges, with the approval of my +Most Illustrious Lord, which substituted a general title relative +to that suit, namely <i>Pro causa de qua in actis</i>; and although +this correction is not to be read in the record (commonly called +the <i>Vachetta</i>) in which decisions are usually noted, yet it was +made in the order for the dispatching of Caponsacchi to his exile +and in the decree assigning to Pompilia the home as a prison. +(Summary, <a href="#proc2_1">No. 1</a>.) And since the latter was made with the +consent of Abate Paolo Franceschini, we may assert that the +said change of title became known to him because of his notorious +solicitude in conducting the case; and so it would be very improbable +that he had not carefully examined such a decree and +the obligation made by Pietro to furnish her food, without hope +of repayment, and the bond given for her to keep the home as a +prison. For these reasons his knowledge of that change should +be considered as sufficiently proved. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And therefore the response falls to the ground that the decree +could not be changed unless both sides were given a hearing. For +while Francesca Pompilia, whose defence had not yet been +finished, was unheard, much less could the title of criminal +knowledge be included in the condemnation of the Canon. For +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">176</a></span> +this would be injurious to her, not merely as regards her reputation, +but also for the loss of her dowry, for which her husband +was especially greedy. For in this way would an undefended +woman suffer condemnation, and what is worse, as the event +shows, would be exposed to the fury of her husband. And hence +with justice was this correction requested and made. And even +if this had not happened, a sentence given against the Canon +could not injure her, as it was a matter done with regard to +other parties. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But it is quite gratuitous to assert that a change as regards +the matter of the trial does also impart the same change as to +the expression of the title of carnal knowledge. For since several +titles were originally expressed in the decree of condemnation +(such as complicity in flight, running away, and carnal knowledge +upon which the suit was based) the statement of the cause contained +therein is no more probable as regards one than as regards +another, and certainly it is not probable as regards them all. +For if they had wished to include all those in the modified decree, +they would have said: <i>Pro causis de quibus in Processu</i>, for the +singular number does not agree with several causes. [Citations.] +But in the prosecution the charge of "criminal knowledge" was +not proved and the Canon could not be condemned for that +while Francesca Pompilia was unheard and undefended. This +is on account of the indivisibility of the crime of adultery, which +does not permit the division of the case for the purpose of condemning +the one, while the case is pending as regards the other. +And this is especially true when all parties are present and are +held in prison. [Citations.] The expression, therefore, <i>Causæ, +de qua in Processu</i>, should be understood to apply only to the +complicity in flight and running away (for this could be issued +without the condemnation of Francesca Pompilia), and not to +apply to "carnal knowledge." For the statement made should +be considered applicable only to those matters with which the +judgment relative thereto agrees. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And this claim of ours is rendered manifest by the mildness of +the penalty to which the Canon was condemned, namely, that +of three years' banishment. This certainly does not correspond +with the offences of running away with a married woman from +her husband's home, bringing her to the City, and carnal +knowledge of her. For inasmuch as the attendant circumstance +of rape, spoken about, is punishable by the capital +penalty, unless a priest is being dealt with, a far severer penalty +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">177</a></span> +would have to be inflicted for the adultery alone, if proof thereof +had resulted from the trial. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>My Lord Advocate of the Poor acknowledges that the penalty +was too light to expiate harshly such a crime, and especially in +accordance with the Constitution of Sixtus, revived by Innocent +XI. of sacred memory. And therefore to avoid acknowledging +the lack of proof, which might very well be inferred from the +lightness of the penalty, he attempts to respond that the said +Canon was dealt with more mildly because he was a foreigner +and because the crime under consideration had been committed +outside of the Ecclesiastical State. In this case one should be +dismissed merely with exile. But this response is proved to be +without foundation for many reasons.</p> + +<p>First, because on account of the well-known privilege of +the City of Rome, which is the country of all men, even those +may be punished here who have committed crime outside of +the Ecclesiastical State, which is subject to the secular authority +of the Pope. And this is true, not merely for the handling of +criminals, which is permitted to any Prince, but for the trial of +the crimes. [Citations.] Cyrill testifies that he himself had so +held in 1540, in the Capitolian Court, and Farinacci testifies +that it was so held in this same Court in the year 1580, in the +case of Gregorio Corso, who had been condemned to the galleys, +because he had committed murder in Florence and had come +here to Rome, after seizing the horse of the one he had slain. +And this was notwithstanding the fact that the cause was very +sharply defended for the accused. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Second, because this authority holds good whenever there is +argument for punishing crimes committed by churchmen, who +are subject to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Pontiff, and in the +City can be punished for their crimes with the ordinary penalty, +even though the crimes were committed outside of the temporal +authority of the Pope. [Citations.] "Rome is a common +country and, therefore, in the Roman courts any cleric or layman +may be brought to trial, even though he did not commit +his crime there." [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Third, because inasmuch as it was claimed that the approach +to the City and the carrying away of the wife to the same were +done because of lust, and to secure greater liberty for knowing +her carnally, by taking her from the home of her husband, so +the Canon, on account of this purpose, would have subjected +himself to penalties such as could really expiate the crime, and +which also might be inflicted here in the City; for one is punishable +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">178</a></span> +with the same penalty who continues in a crime here, +although he put it into effect outside of the State. [Citations.] +Caballus [Citation] holds that, for deciding the jurisdiction of a +judge over crimes that have been committed, the person offending, +rather than the offence, should be considered. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Fourth, because the pretended carnal knowledge, so far as it +can be said to be proved in the prosecution (and it can be +verified that the decree was changed with relation to that), +happened in the Ecclesiastical State; for the strongest proof +of that crime was drawn from the asserted sleeping together +in the same bedroom at the inn of Castelnuovo. [Citation.] +And therefore the Canon could and should have been punished +with condign punishment, not merely for his undertaking, but +for the adultery, if that had been proved. And since this was +not imposed, it may well be asserted that the Canon was not at +all condemned for "criminal knowledge," unless one wishes to +criticise as unjust that decree, which imposed a mild penalty +and one suitable merely to simple running away and complicity +in flight, and which was much tempered because of the excuse +brought by the Procurator of the Poor. Therefore it may be +asserted that the Canon was not condemned for the pretended +criminal knowledge, since the nature of the penalty well proves +the nature of the crime, with which it should be commensurate, +according to Deuteronomy 25: "According to the measure of +one's sin shall be the manner of his stripes." [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And therefore, since the pretended condemnation of Canon +Caponsacchi for criminal knowledge of Francesca Pompilia is +excluded, the pretended notoriousness of the adultery resulting +therefrom also falls to the ground. Neither can this notoriousness +be alleged against her undefended. And just as public +vengeance, which is to be decreed by a judge, cannot be based +lawfully upon it, so much less should private vengeance be +considered excusable, when taken by the husband in murdering +her after an interval. He is immune from the ordinary penalty +for murder even according to the more merciful opinion only +when the adultery is established by the very clearest proofs +displayed in confession by the accused, or by a sentence given +thereupon.</p> + +<p>Likewise it would be superfluous to avoid the presumptions +adduced by the Defence, especially by the Procurator of the +Poor, to destroy the proof of adultery drawn therefrom; for +this single response would be enough, namely, that these proofs +were all gathered together in the prosecution for Pompilia's +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">179</a></span> +flight, made at the instance of Count Guido, he pressing hard +to gain the dowry because of her adultery. And this was +insisted on by the counsel for the Fisc, who wrote acutely upon +these matters at that time. And yet, in the report of the cause +these presumptions were not considered by the judges because +of their irrelevance. This is evident from the lightness of the +penalty decreed against the Canon. And so the examination +of these cannot be renewed after the Fisc has yielded and +quietly acquiesced in the sentence, from which it could appeal +if it considered itself wronged. Nor could Guido legitimately +have recourse to such awful vengeance by his own hand. But +lest some feature of the case may be left untouched, and that the +justice of the decree may be more clearly asserted, I have taken +the pains to confute these briefly.</p> + +<p>And since, in the first place, the cause of flight is considered +by the Defence in order that they may prove that the said flight +was entirely illicit and was planned for easier criminal knowledge, +the proofs brought for this purpose should be examined. +The chief of these was drawn from the asserted letter of +Francesca Pompilia, written to Abate Franceschini. This makes +pretence that her parents urged her to poison her husband, her +brother, and her mother-in-law, to burn the home, and to +return to the City with her lover. But one cannot have a better +refutation of this than the very tenor of that letter, including +matters that are so improbable, yes and indeed incredible, that +it was rightly rejected by the judges. For who can be found so +destitute and ignorant of filial love and duty as to make himself +believe that a mere child, not more than fourteen years old +[Citation], married away from her father's home, grieving +bitterly for the departure of her parents, and wretchedly kept +in the home of her husband, so that she was obliged to have +recourse to ecclesiastic and laic authorities, could have written +to her husband's brother (who was so unfeeling toward them), +with a calm mind, of such base counsels and commands given +by them, unless, as she ingenuously confesses, she was compelled +by her husband to write it? Nor could she, without great peril, +refuse her husband, who was demanding this. Such an improbability +alone is enough to thrill with horror those reading +it, and well shows that she had written this not of her own +accord, but under compulsion. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And, therefore, there is no need to examine whether the +qualification added to her confession is probable, namely, that +her husband had first marked the letters of the said epistle, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">180</a></span> +which she had afterward inked by tracing them with a pen; +because she did not know how to write. For possibly she +shuddered to confess that she had written such matters, even +under compulsion of fear, to the injury of her father and mother. +Such fear is quite presumable in a wretched wife of tender age, +destitute of all help, away from her father's hearth and in her +husband's home. [Citations.] Mogolon says that from the +absence of relatives, the presumption of such fear may arise. +[Citation.] And this is especially true after she had had recourse +in vain to the authorities. Nor is a sufficient proof to the +contrary deducible from Francesca's signature to the matrimonial +contract, and from the letters that were said to have been +written and sent by her in succession to the Canon, or else +thrown from the window. [Citation.] For the very brief +signature made in the marriage agreement does not show such +skill in writing that with the same ease she could have written +so long a letter, inasmuch as daily experience teaches that +many are found who can scarcely write their own names.</p> + +<p>Still less can the ability to write be said to be proved by the +asserted love-letters; for these were constantly denied by +Pompilia. Nor can these letters be said to be sufficiently +verified by the assertion of the said witness for the Fisc, namely, +that she threw from the window a note, which the Canon picked +up and then departed. For aside from the fact that the witness +stands alone and is of the basest condition, namely a dishonest +harlot, and so unsuited for proving a matter [Citations], she +neither affirms, nor can affirm that the said letter was written +by Francesca Pompilia. Likewise the letters found in the +prison of Castelnuovo might have been written by some stranger's +hand. And even though they had been written by her, inasmuch +as they are of a later date, they do not prove her skill in writing +at some past time; for she could have acquired this skill afterward +because of desperation which sharpened her wits, for the +purpose of inducing the Canon to undertake the flight with her, +so that she might escape the peril of imminent death. For in +such matters at these, which are variable and can be changed, +one cannot well argue from the present to the past. [Citations.] +And that in fact she did learn to write in Arezzo after the departure +of her parents is evident from her letter written in the +prison of Castelnuovo, and found among her private papers +after her death. This is given in the present Summary, <a href="#proc2_3">No. 3.</a></p> + +<p>The proofs of the abovesaid letter [to Abate Franceschini] +drawn from the letters of the Governor of Arezzo, of the Reverend +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">181</a></span> +Bishop, and of Bartolommeo Albergotti, are so far from excluding +the legitimate reason for flight given by herself and the Canon, +during the prosecution, that they rather favour it. For although +they criticised her for having such ill-advised recourse to them, +they possibly did this to free themselves from censure for having +thoughtlessly turned her away. Therefore it is more probable +that by them the minds of her cruel husband and of her mother-in-law, +who was pitiless and implacable, as experience teaches +us, were exasperated all the more. Any one may well know that +Guido's mind was much more embittered after the lawsuit +brought concerning the pretence of birth and the rescinding of +the dowry contract, and after the publication of pamphlets +about the domestic scantiness and the base treatment which +they had suffered in the home of the couple in Arezzo. His +anger was also stirred by his jealous suspicion of the Canon +(although Pompilia's love of the latter was merely pretended +for the purpose of winning him) and by his exasperation, that +increases the deadly hatred, which arises from a lawsuit about a +considerable amount, and much more about an entire property. +[Citations.] Such should the controversy about the pretence of +birth be considered. Nor can the just fear of the luckless wife +as to her deadly peril be denied. And driven to desperation in +avoiding this, she might well have fled; for if it is permissible +because of blows beyond mere legitimate correction [Citations] +how much more permissible should it be considered, when the +wife was continually afraid that he would kill her either with the +sword or by means of poison. And, to avoid this, it was but +prudent counsel for her to leave her husband and go back to her +father's hearth.</p> + +<p>It would indeed have been better if she had won her security +by having recourse to the Right Reverend Bishop, in order that +he might place her in some nunnery or with some honest matron; +or to the Lord Governor, who would have considered her safety +and the honour of her husband's family; or if she had fled in the +company of some one connected with the household. But the +fear of imminent peril does not permit one to take better counsel, +and especially a wretched wife of tender age, destitute of all aid +and exposed to the fury of her husband and her mother-in-law. +And still further, she might well fear that new recourse to them +would be in vain, since she had found the former so useless. Nor +could she find any better way of fleeing safely, wherein she +thought lay the sole help for herself, than by using the help and +company of the Canon, who had been proposed to her for this +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">182</a></span> +purpose by the Canon Conti and by Signor Gregorio Guillichini, +relatives of her husband. It is incredible that they would have +conspired against Guido's honour without the strongest and +most urgent reason and without confidence in Caponsacchi's +honesty and modesty. For one of them, namely Gregorio, had +offered himself as a companion for the journey and would have +carried out his offer if his infirmity had permitted; as we read in +the said letter of Francesca Pompilia found since her death and +shown in our present Summary, <a href="#proc2_3">No. 3</a>, which refers to the same +causes, of the infirmity of Gregorio and the imminent peril, +which did not permit her to await his convalescence. And +therefore she is worthy of excuse since she fled for dire necessity +in company of the Canon, a man of modesty well known by her +(as is likewise evident from another letter in the Summary of +our opponents, <a href="#defno7">No. 7</a>, letter 12, in which she calls him the chaste +Joseph, and from the other letter, in which she commends him +for his sense of shame). For if she chose this remedy under dire +necessity, she should be excused according to the common +axiom, "necessity knows no law." [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor is an illegitimate cause of flight to be inferred because +of the dishonest love with which Francesca Pompilia pursued +the Canon in some of these letters. For although they seem +amatory, yet they were ordained to the purpose of alluring this +same Canon, in order that he might flee with her; since, without +him, she knew that she could neither carry that out, nor even +attempt it. Hence the letters can afford no proof of subsequent +adultery. For although proof may result from love-letters, +according to the authorities adduced by the Defence in § <i>His +praehibitis</i>, yet this is avoided, if the letters are directed to a +permissible end, such as flight to escape deadly peril. For then, +inasmuch as the end is permissible, the means are likewise so +considered, even though these are not without suspicion; for +they are not considered in themselves, but because of their end. +[Citations.] Nor is the proof of adultery hitherto drawn from +love-letters so very strong unless they include the implicit confession +of subsequent fornication. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>The following consideration is especially urgent in leading to +the belief that the luckless girl thought the Canon would conduct +himself modestly during the journey. For in one of her letters +she does not fail to take him to task (who had elsewhere been +commended for honesty and modesty) because he had sent her +questionable verses (present Summary, <a href="#proc2_4">No. 4)</a>: "I am surprised +that you, who are so chaste, have composed and copied +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">183</a></span> +matters so immodest." And further on: "I do not want you +to do in everything as you have done in these books; the first of +them was so very nice, but these other octaves are quite the +contrary. I cannot believe that you, who were so honourable, +would become so bold." From this sincere rebuke it is quite +evident in what spirit these letters were written, even though +they are filled with blandishments and proofs of love; for she +shrank even from the dishonourable verses sent to her. Hence +the letters should be understood according to the intention of +the one writing them, just as one's words are. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And should not the supposition that the unfortunate wife had +destroyed her matronly shame in the journey be therefore considered +trivial and improbable? For she had quite enough to +do to provide for her own safety by headlong flight. Nor is it +probable that she was tempted by the Canon, since the love +between them is proved merely by the said letters which were +preparing for the flight. And these letters show her solicitude +for his modesty and continence, since for the mere sending of +them she had made such complaint. For she feared lest he +might become too bold, as is evident from details of the letter +cited above. Nor are examples lacking of continence observed +during a longer and easier journey, which had been undertaken +and completed by lovers, even though they might lawfully have +indulged their love. Hence it is not improbable that the +wretched girl kept herself scrupulously within bounds; for she +was in deadly peril, which she hoped to avoid by precipitate +flight.</p> + +<p>The other proofs of this pretended adultery are far weaker, +and were rightly ignored in the report of the case, both as regards +the flight and as regards the decreeing of torment; for mutual +love between her and the Canon cannot be said to be sufficiently +proved by the abovesaid letters; for they were preparatory to +this prearranged flight.</p> + +<p>The entry and egress to and from the home of Francesca by +night is proved by a single base witness. Nor should even such +entry be considered to be for a bad end, since it was in preparation +for the flight. For when we have a permissible cause given, +to which a matter may be referred, it should not be attributed to +one that is illegitimate and criminal. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>To this reason also should be referred her readiness in showing +herself at the window by day and night at the hiss which gave +signal that her pretended lover was passing. For since her love +might be a mere matter of pretence for the purpose of winning +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">184</a></span> +him to give her help in the flight by affording her his company +in the journey, these marks of love can be of no further import +than the pretended love itself. The unfortunate wife employed +it as a stratagem, indeed, that she might provide for her own +safety. And so this response recurs: "If the end is lawful, the +means ordered toward carrying it out cannot be condemned."</p> + +<p>The pretended insidious manner of preparing for the flight and +putting it into execution by means of an opiate administered to +her husband and the servants (so far as it is proved, and it was by +no means proved in the Prosecution) affords indeed a proof of her +flight, but not of adultery; for it was prearranged, not for that +purpose, but to escape deadly peril, to which the wife would +have exposed herself, all too foolishly, unless she had made sure +that her husband, who was lying in bed with her, was sound +asleep, or unless she had contrived some such easy way.</p> + +<p>The ardour shown in some of the letters is indeed a sign of +love, according to the word of the poet: "Love is a thing full +of solicitous fear." [Ovid, <i>Heroides</i>, I. 12.] But since love was +pretended for a legitimate end (as was said) she could also make +a show of ardour for feigning love, since it tended toward the +same end of winning his goodwill, so that possessed of his true +service she might escape. Therefore, from this pretended love +and these feigned signs of love, one cannot argue that their +departure together from the home of the husband and their +association during a long journey gives proof of the pretended +adultery; because even in true and mutual love continence has +been observed, which is certainly more difficult.</p> + +<p>Nor are the authorities adduced by the Defence, in § <i>Accedit +quod</i>, applicable; because that text has regard to a woman spending +the night outside of her husband's home and against his will, +without just and probable cause, as is evident from the words +of the same. This decision is not applicable to our case, since +the wretched Pompilia left her husband's home and went to her +father's hearth that she might escape the deadly peril which she +feared was threatening her. And so, since she did it for just and +probable reason, the condemnation of the aforesaid text is turned +away. And Farinacci so explains the assertion. [Citations.] +"But it is otherwise if done for reason, because the mere spending +of the night together does not of itself prove vice; for a case +can be given where a wife spent the night with men, and yet did +not break her marriage vow." [Citation.] Since this possibility +is verified in our own case also, the proof of subsequent +adultery cannot be inferred from her flight and association with +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">185</a></span> +him in the journey, for the purpose of providing for her own +safety.</p> + +<p>Their mutual kissing on the journey, so far as it is proved, +affords no light presumption of violated shame; but the proof +of it is too uncertain; for it rests upon the word of a single base +witness, who swears to matters that are quite improbable, +namely that, while he was driving their carriage very rapidly, +he saw Francesca Pompilia and the Canon kissing one another. +How full of animus this deposition really may be is evident from +this fact—that during the night he saw a momentary and fleeting +deed, without giving any reason for his knowledge, such as that +the moon was shining or that some artificial light afforded him +the opportunity to see it. [Citations.] The improbability, or +rather incredibility, is increased because, while the witness was +intent on driving the carriage with such great speed as to seem +like flying (as another witness testifies), how could he look backward +and see their mutual kissing? Such an improbability +would take belief away not merely from a single witness, but from +many of them. [Citation.] Furthermore, there is the possibility +to be considered that the jostling together of those sitting +in the carriage might have happened from the high speed; and +from this fact an over-curious witness might believe that they +were kissing each other, although, in fact, the nearness of their +heads and faces to one another might indeed be by mere chance, +and not for the purpose of shameful and lustful kisses. Because +whenever an act may be presumed to be for either a good or a +bad end, the presumption of the evil end is always excluded. +[Citations.] And so in the said report of the prosecution for +flight, this presumption was justly passed over because of lack of +proof; nor would it have been rejected otherwise.</p> + +<p>Nor can this improbable and prejudiced deposition of the said +witness receive any support from the pretended letters, in which +Francesca thanks him for the kisses sent, which she says would +be dearer to her if they had been given by the Canon himself, and +sends him back ten hundred thousand times as many. For it +cannot be thence inferred that if the opportunity were given their +mutual kissing would follow, since these words were offered as +serviceable and alluring for the purpose of winning him over; +nor do they involve an obligation. [Citations.] And therefore +they do not lead one to infer that they were carried out, especially +since Francesca many and many a time warned the Canon to +observe due modesty. And when she found that he had transgressed +its limits by sending her dishonourable verses she abjured +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">186</a></span> +him not to become bold in urging his passion. This is far removed +from impure desire to receive his kisses, which is formally +stated in the said letter, as it is without any thought of injuring +her matronly honour.</p> + +<p>The use also of laic garb, in which the Canon was found clothed, +can afford no proof, because, as he is no priest, he cannot be said +to be forbidden to do so on a journey. And this was probably +arranged in good faith to conceal himself and to avert scandal, +which might be conceived at seeing a priest with a woman in the +flower of her age and, as I have heard, of no small reputation +for beauty, journeying without the company of another woman +or servant. [Citation.] And so the authority of Matthæus +Sanzio, etc., is not applicable, because in his case there was no +concurrent cause on account of which the priest might approach +with improper clothes and girded with arms; and he was found +by the husband, either in the very act or in preparation thereto, +and was killed on the spot. In such a case the proofs of adultery +may well be admitted for the purpose of diminishing the penalty, +and they were gathered by the same author to that end.</p> + +<p>Their sleeping together on the same bed, or at least in the same +bedroom, at the inn of Castelnuovo, was not given consideration +in the report of the prosecution for flight, because of defect of +proof. This charge was indeed denied by Francesca Pompilia, +and the Canon frankly confessed merely that he had rested for a +little while on another bed in the same room. Nor ought a +brief stay in that room be magnified to a crime, since it should +be attributed to his guardianship of the said Francesca, whom +he was accompanying on the journey, and hence was under +obligation to guard her lest some evil might befall her. Whenever +an act may be said to be done for a good purpose all suspicion +of evil ceases. In these very circumstances, Gravetta +[Citation] says that the interpretation should tend toward +lenience, even though the harsher interpretation seems the more +probable. Nor does it suffice as a full proof of adultery (if one +is arguing a criminal case) that a young man be seen alone and +naked with her, and that he be found locked in the bedroom with +the wife, even though he have his shoes and clothing off; because +these matters may be merely preparatory. And much less can +proof of adultery arise from his brief stay in the same bedroom +for the purpose of protecting her.</p> + +<p>Nor can proof of their having slept together be drawn from +the deposition of the servant of the same inn who asserted that he +had been ordered to prepare only a single bed. For it does not +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">187</a></span> +follow from this that both of them slept in it; but this was done +because only Pompilia wished to rest a little while to refresh her +strength, which had been exhausted by the swiftness of the +journey they had made. The Canon was keeping guard over +her and preparing for the continuance of the journey; and so, +when the husband arrived, he was attending to this by ordering +that the carriage be made ready. Hence no proof of their having +slept together can result from this deposition, and it was justly +rejected by the judges, so that it needs no further refutation.</p> + +<p>And although Francesca Pompilia, in her cross-examination, +tried to conceal a longer stay at the said inn by asserting that they +had arrived there at dawn, yet no proof of adultery may be +drawn from the said lie, for she made that assertion to avoid the +suspicion of violated modesty, which might be conceived from +a longer delay and more convenient opportunity. And so, +inasmuch as her confession would have done her no harm, even +if she had acknowledged it with circumstances leading to belief +in the preservation of her sense of honour, neither can this lie +injure her. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Since, for these reasons, the proof of the pretended adultery +is excluded and almost utterly destroyed, no attention should +be paid to the fact that Count Guido, in his confession, claims +the mitigating circumstance of injured honour, as regards both +his wife and his parents-in-law; and that this confession cannot +be divided for the purpose of inflicting the ordinary penalty. +For authorities of great name are not lacking who affirm that +a qualification to this end added to a confession, ought to be +rejected; and above the others, is Bartolo [Citation], who +proves this conclusion by many reasons, and responds to those +given contrary [Citation], where it is said that a judge should +not admit such qualified confession. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Nor is such a plea of injured honour always in one's favour +in avoiding the capital penalty, but only when vengeance is +taken immediately; or after an interval, according to more +lenient opinion, when the adultery is proved by condemnatory +sentence or by confession.</p> + +<p>But the reins of private vengeance would be relaxed far too +much to the detriment of the state if, when proof of adultery +were lacking, a stand could be made for the purpose of diminishing +the penalty upon some qualification added by the defendant +to his confession. Because in this way a witness might make +a way of escape in his own cause, which is not permitted to any +one. [Citations.] And nothing more absurd can be thought +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">188</a></span> +of than that the burden of proof incumbent upon him for escaping +the ordinary penalty might be discharged by the mere assertion +of the defendant.</p> + +<p>Nor should we admit the opinion that, even when the adultery +is proved, a husband may kill, after an interval, an adulterous +wife without incurring the capital penalty, since the weightiest +authorities deny that. [Citations.] Bartolo, in distinguishing +between real and personal injury, affirms that when injury is +personal, it should be resented immediately; but if it be real +it may be resented after an interval. [Citations.] And Gomez +declares: "I hold the contrary opinion, indeed, that a husband +may be punished with the ordinary penalty of such a crime as +murder; and for this reason he may not by any means be +excused, because murder cannot be committed to compensate +for a crime or for its past essence, unless one kill in the act of +flagrant crime," etc. And in subsequent numbers he responds +to reasons given to the contrary. [Citation.] Gaillard, after +he says that murder committed for honour's sake is permissible, +states that this exception should be understood to hold good if +the injury be resented immediately, but that it is otherwise +if done after an interval. In this case the retort is more like +vengeance than the defence of honour, and the offender is held +to account for the injuries. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>Much less can it be claimed that the vengeance was taken +immediately because the husband executed it as soon as possible, +according to the authorities adduced by my Lord Advocate of +the Poor [Citation], where he tries to show that since Guido +was unarmed, or insufficiently armed (that is, he was girded +only with a traveller's sword), he could not attack the wife +accompanied by the Canon; for Caponsacchi, as he claims, is +strong and bold, and accustomed to sin in that way, and was +carrying firearms. And the wife showed herself ready to die +in the defence of her lover; for it is said still further that the +wife rushed upon Guido with drawn sword, and was about to +kill him, if she had not been checked by the police officers. But +the opportunity to kill an adulteress is not to be so taken that +a violent death may be visited upon her with all security and +without any risk. For every legal opinion giving excuse for +diminishing the penalty shrinks from this. For such diminution +of the capital penalty follows because of the violence of sudden +anger, which compels the husband to neglect the risk to his own +life, that he may avenge the injury done him by the adultery. +And so this first opportunity, as spoken of by the authorities, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">189</a></span> +in order that murder may be said to be committed immediately, +should be understood to be whenever an occasion first offers +itself, in excusing the delay in taking vengeance either because +of absence or for some other just reason. Such is the fact in +the case about which Matthæus Sanfelix writes, <i>contr.</i> 12. For +in that case, the adultery was committed in the absence of the +husband, and the wife had run away, so that he could not have +avenged himself earlier, as is evident from the narrative of fact, +given in No. 1, and No. 28 established this conclusion: "So +they are excused if they take vengeance as soon as possible, +since it then seems that they killed incontinently."</p> + +<p>But who can say in our case that the husband took the first +chance, since when he found his wife in the very act of flight, +at the tavern of Castelnuovo, he abstained from vengeance with +his own hand, and turned to legal vengeance, to which he had +always clung. And indeed he charges himself with the worst +baseness when he asserts that he was unequal to the task of +taking vengeance because of the fierce nature of the Canon; +since, when the latter had been arrested, Guido could have +rushed upon his wife. Nor ought the kind of arms they carried +to have alarmed him, because, according to the description made +in the prosecution, it is apparent that the Canon was wearing +only a sword. And so they were provided with like arms. He +would not have taken such care of his own safety if he had been +driven to taking vengeance by the stings of his honour that +needed reparation, even at some risk to himself. For just anger +knows no moderation. And he should lay the blame on himself +if, alone and insufficiently armed, he had followed up his wife, +who was fleeing, as he might fear, with a strong and better-armed +lover. His very manner of following her proves the +more strongly that his mind had turned toward legal vengeance, +for the purpose of winning the coveted dowry, rather than to +vengeance with his own hand for recovering his honour. For +facts well show that such was his thought. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Likewise the delay of the vengeance after the return of the +wife to her father's home excludes the pretended qualification +that the vengeance was taken "immediately," because he could +not put it into execution sooner. For the return home took +place on October 12 of last year, and the murder was not +committed till the second of January of this year. And we +should rather assert that he was waiting for her confinement, +which took place on December 18, in order that he might make +safe the succession to the property, for which he was eagerly +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">190</a></span> +gaping; because he immediately put into effect his depraved +plan by destroying his wife and her parents with an awful +murder. Hence, from a comparison of these dates it will be +easy to see this, and it is evident with what purpose he committed +the murders, and whether this vengeance for the asserted +reparation of his injured honour may be said to have been +undertaken "immediately," that is, as soon as opportunity +was given, according to the authorities adduced on the other +side.</p> + +<p>Then when he had chosen legal vengeance by the imprisonment +of the wife and of the pretended lover, and by the prosecution +of the criminal cause, it was not permissible for him to +go back to vengeance with his own hand; and in taking that he +cannot be said to have taken vengeance immediately. He also +violated public justice and the majesty of the Prince himself. +This single circumstance greatly exasperates the penalty and +increases the crime. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>[But the above is true] in spite of the fact that the conclusions +adduced by the Advocate of the Poor, in § <i>Et tantum abest</i>, may +be applicable, and likewise the authorities approving those +conclusions, on the ground that it is not presumable that the +husband has remitted the injury, but rather that his desire to +avenge himself has continued; and that this excludes the charge +of treachery, even though the husband use trickery in taking +vengeance. Because in the present case the question is not as +to the nature of the murder, from which it might be claimed to +have been treacherous. The husband indeed did not conceal +his injury, but rather laid it bare by turning to legal vengeance. +Although this is possibly less honourable, yet since it was pleasing +to him, for the purpose of gaining the dowry, he could not when +frustrated in this hope, because the adultery was unproved, take +up again the vengeance with his own hand. And this is true +even though he pretends as an excuse for his delay that he +could not accomplish it sooner. For since the delay and +hindrance arose from his own act he could not take therefrom +the protection of an excuse. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But, however he might find excuse for the barbarous slaughter +of his wife while under the authority of the judge at the instance +and delivery of her husband, certainly the murder of Pietro and +Violante should be considered utterly inexcusable. In his confession +he has tried to apply to them also his plea of injured +honour, because of their pretended complicity in urging the +flight of his wife and in her asserted dishonour. Yet no proof +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">191</a></span> +of this qualification can be brought, nor did the slightest shadow +of it result from the prosecution for flight. And this is proved +to be improbable, and utterly incredible, from merely considering +the fact that Abate Franceschini, brother of the accused +and confessed defendant, would not have consented that she +be committed to their custody if he had had even the slightest +suspicion of their complicity, since he so keenly desired the +reparation of their honour. This fact, which was plainly confessed +in an instrument prepared in the statement of fact in the +Italian language [<a href="#pamphlet10">Pamphlet 10</a>] and very stoutly denied by the +Procurator of the Poor, was admitted by his own wonderful +ingenuity in denying merely that notice had reached the husband, +or in claiming that the Fisc could pretend to no more than mere +presumptive knowledge in Guido.</p> + +<p>But, still further, such knowledge is quite probable and is +drawn from strong proof. For it is very probable that Guido +was informed by his brother of his wife's departure from the +Monastery, of her establishment in the said home, of the obligation +assumed by her parents to provide her with food, and +especially of her detected pregnancy. [Citation.] But we are +not now arguing to prove the husband's knowledge thereof, but +to draw from that consent of Abate Paolo a proof which would +exclude the pretended complicity of Pietro and Violante in the +dishonour of the wife, which latter is by no means proved.</p> + +<p>So far is such complicity from being proved as regards Pietro, +that the very contrary is quite evident from his will, made in +1695, after litigation had been instituted about Pompilia's pretended +birth. In this will, notwithstanding the litigation, in the +first place he leaves as his usufructuary heir Violante his wife, +and after her death Francesca Pompilia, laying upon her the +obligation to dwell in the City and to live honourably. This is +evident from the details of the said will given in our present +Summary, <a href="#proc2_5">No. 5</a>. In this he also asserts that she had thus far +conducted herself honourably, and he claimed to leave the +annuity to her because of her good manner of life. And so it +becomes still further incredible that he, while alive, was willing +to conspire in her dishonour, from which he shrank even when +dead. For the income was to be taken from her if she should +live a dishonest life, and he urged her in case her marriage were +dissolved to assume a religious dress, and he left her a fat legacy +to that end.</p> + +<p>Nor can it afford any proof of this pretended complicity that +when Guido had made pretence of delivering a letter sent to +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">192</a></span> +them from the Canon, the doors were immediately opened by +Violante to the assassins. The attorneys for the Defence try +to argue from this ready credulity that the name of the lover +was not hateful to Violante, and that hence his intimacy with +Francesca was not displeasing. But since the Canon was the +author of her liberation from deadly peril by bringing her from +her husband's home to her father's hearth at the neglect of his +own risk, it should not seem wonderful that Violante should give +proof of a grateful mind for the help given her daughter and +should open the door. Nor can one infer therefrom consent in +unchastity, from which their past acquaintance had been +entirely free. Much more is this so at a time when he himself +was absent and in banishment at Civita Vecchia.</p> + +<p>Therefore the true cause, on account of which the Comparini +also were murdered, could be no other than the hatred with +which the husband had been aflame; [and this first of all was] +because of the lawsuit concerning the supposed birth, which they +had brought, and which had deceived him in his hope of gaining +a fat dowry and inheritance; [and second] his desire for +vengeance because of the pamphlets distributed at the time of +the said lawsuit, and which had exposed the meagreness of the +home comforts and the wretched treatment they had received +in the home of the husband. These two do not excuse Guido +from the penalty for premeditated murder, and indeed increase +it, even raising it to the crime of <i>læsa majestas</i>, according to the +well-known order of the Constitution of Alexander, as was proved +in our past information, § <i>Accedit ad exasperandam</i>.</p> + +<p>To escape the penalty assigned thereto by the disposition of +this decree, in vain does he turn to an excuse drawn from supervening +provocation. [Citation.] But so far as it is claimed that +this crime resulted from the counsel they gave toward her flight, +and their complicity in the same, the proof of such complicity +is entirely drawn from the asserted letter, written by Francesca +Pompilia to Abate Franceschini. But this letter has been completely +rejected, and even spurned by Guido himself, since in the +prosecution for flight we find no insistence was made that action +should be entered against Pietro and Violante for their pretended +instigation. Pietro, moreover, had long ago broken off the +lawsuit brought as regards the pretended birth and the revocation +of the dowry contract, and so this complicity cannot be +made to seem the sole provoking cause, which would exclude +<i>causa litis</i>. For such a cause should be true and not pretended, +and should be in accord with the crime committed. [Citations.] +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">193</a></span> +These excuses, indeed, which are claimed to be drawn from +complicity in the asserted dishonour, are still further excluded +by lack of proof, both of the impurity and of their connivance +therein; and so the provocation implied therefrom is shown to +be entirely irrelevant, and possibly fraudulent.</p> + +<p>The other suit for divorce, brought in the name of Francesca +Pompilia, it is vainly claimed is made void because of the asserted +invalidity of the summons; for this summons was executed +against Abate Franceschini, who lacked the authority of a proxy. +Yet his authorisation was quite full enough for a lawsuit, as is +evident from its tenor as given in our present Summary, <a href="#proc2_6">No. 6</a>, +and accordingly when a suit was brought it was ample for receiving +a summons. [Citation.] We are also dealing with the +conditions of the Constitution of Alexander and of the order of +the Banns given against those who commit offence on account +of lawsuits. Hence the reply is not relevant, which is given by +the Procurator of the Poor in § <i>Quae etiam aptantur</i>, that when +the dishonesty of the wife is established her impunity from the +wrath of her husband, who would take vengeance, should not be +permitted by the introduction of a divorce suit. Nor can such +murder be said to be committed for the reparation of honour +when committed in anger at a lawsuit. For he takes for granted +as proved, what is in question, namely, the dishonour of the +wife, the proof of which is quite lacking. And Guido might +have proceeded to such an extreme if, as soon as the adultery +was committed, his wife brought a suit for divorce; but it is +otherwise since he tried that revenge after the way of legal +vengeance had been chosen by bringing criminal charge for the +pretended adultery and for the purpose of winning the dowry. +For after he was frustrated in this hope (since no proofs of +adultery resulted from the prosecution), and after her husband's +mind had been exasperated, she ought to be permitted to provide +for her own safety by begging for the remedy of divorce. And +while such judgment is pending any murder inflicted upon her +ought surely to be expiated by the penalties inflicted under the +sanction of the Alexandrian Constitution and of the Banns. +For the provision of this decree is applicable, since the murder +was committed while the criminal cause, brought against her for +pretended adultery by her husband, was still pending. And this +decree includes both civil and criminal suits, as is evident from +reading it.</p> + +<p>Likewise the assembling of armed men, and their introduction +into the City for accomplishing more safely the murder of the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">194</a></span> +entire family, increases the crime to <i>læsa majestas</i>, and also +necessitates the increasing of the punishment, as was affirmed +in our former information. Nor is this avoided by the replies +given, or rather repeated, by the Defence, and especially by the +response that since the principal offence was committed for +honour's sake (and hence the ordinary penalty of the <i>Lex +Cornelia de Sicariis</i> has no application for that reason), so likewise +the penalty for assembling men, imposed by the Apostolic +Constitutions and the general Banns, cannot be inflicted; for +the latter is included with the penalty for the principal offence, +which alone is to be attended, since the spirit and purpose make +differences in crimes. [Citations.] Because the order of the +said Constitution and Banns would prove utterly vain if the +penalty for assemblage should cease, whenever the assembly +were made for the purpose of committing some crime that is +punishable with a milder penalty. [Citation.] This Bull +indeed is applicable even when men are called to arms in a permissible +cause and for a good end; because by it the Supreme +Pontiff wished to provide for the public security and to restrain +the audacity of those laying down the law for themselves. +Hence all the more shall it have place when the assembly may +be made for an evil end, namely for committing crime, even +though the crime may not deserve the ordinary death penalty, +and when the crime actually follows. [Citation.] Spada gives +this reason, that the Pontiff in establishing this Constitution +considered only the uproar and other ills which are accustomed +to arise from the assembling of armed men to the injury of the +public peace. And although his opinion was rejected by the +authorities adduced by his Honour, the Advocate of the Poor, +in § <i>non refragante</i>, this refutation does not apply to the assembling +of armed men to an evil end (even though this end is not so +criminal that the death penalty may be inflicted), but to their +assemblage for a permitted cause of regaining possession immediately, +by meeting force with force. Even in this latter case +Spada holds that there is place for the order of the Bull. Hence +the refutation given above does not prevent the application of +the provision of the abovesaid Constitution to our case, since +the assembling was prearranged for the murder of an entire +family, which was put into execution with reckless daring.</p> + +<p>Nor may the opinions of the said judges of the Sacred Rota, +requiring that the assemblage be directed against the Prince or +the State, and not to commit some other crime, stand in the +way; because if this qualification were accepted as true the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">195</a></span> +decree would be vain which had raised the act to the crime of +<i>læsa majestas</i> and rebellion; for this crime would result plainly +enough from the deed itself, and from the intent to disturb the +peace of the Prince and the State. And so far as the opinion +affirmed by these authorities does have foundation, it can be +applied when we investigate the order of the Constitution, and +not of the Banns issued later. For this decree would prove vain +and useless if the capital penalty, imposed thereby against those +assembling armed men, could be applied only when the crime +for which the assembly was made was punishable with the same +penalty. And even if this necessity be admitted, the application +of the Constitution cannot be avoided, because no plea of +injured honour can be alleged in excuse for the murder of Pietro +and Violante, and it had not at all been proved as regards +Francesca Pompilia.</p> + +<p>Likewise the preparation and use of prohibited arms is also +punishable with the capital penalty, if we investigate the order +of the Banns and Constitutions of Alexander VIII., of sacred +memory. Nor is this sufficiently avoided by the response given +by the Defence that it is included in the main offence; so that +no greater penalty can be inflicted for it than the main crime +itself deserves. For what we have said above as regards "an +assembling" is opposed to such a confusing of the punishment +of the Banns, and the authorities adduced in our past response, +§ <i>nec delationis</i>, affirm the contrary. And those authorities +cited for the contrary opinion should be understood to apply +only when one is dealing with an insult, or with murder committed +in a quarrel, or in self-defence, or for the sake of immediate +reparation of honour. [Citation.] The difficulty is +at an end in our case, because of the clear disposition of the +Banns, which expressly declare and command that the penalty +for the carrying of arms is not to be confounded with the penalty +of the crime committed therewith. Nor does the response given +by the Procurator of the Poor seem strong enough to avoid this; +namely that when, under the common law, the Banns receive +only a passive interpretation, merely the crime of preparing and +bearing arms for committing murder is considered; but that it +is otherwise if the arms are borne, for no ill end, and then a +crime is committed with them. Because it would be too harsh +for one bearing arms for no ill end and then sinning with them, +to suffer a greater penalty than one preparing arms to commit +crime, and carrying his purpose into effect. Hence these Banns +never can receive such an interpretation. For since by them +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">196</a></span> +the carrying of arms is forbidden as pernicious and as affording +occasion to commit crime, much more should the bearing of +them when purposed for committing crime be considered prohibited +and punishable with a rigorous penalty. This is especially +true when we consider the declaration that the crimes are not to +be confounded with one another.</p> + +<p>There is left, finally, one other qualification, which greatly +aggravates the crime, namely the violating of the home assigned +as a prison with the consent of Abate Franceschini. And this is +so in spite of what can be alleged as to Guido's ignorance of this +circumstance. Because in the said writing prepared in Italian +for giving true notice of the fact [<a href="#pamphlet10">Pamphlet 10</a>], it is asserted +that the entire management of the cause was left and committed +to this same brother, since Guido had left the City. Hence it is +quite incredible that Guido was not informed by him of so important +a matter. And as concerning the distinction between +violating a public prison and mere custody in a home under +bond, and as to offence permitted therein for honour's sake, we +have given sufficient response in our past argument, § <i>Quibus +accedit</i> and those following. For the same reasoning is applicable +in both cases, since in both the person detained is under the +protection of the Prince whose majesty is accordingly insulted. +And the excuse would hold good if we were arguing about the +resenting of an injury offered in prison. Under these very +circumstances do those authorities adduced by the Defence +speak, as is evident from their recognition of them.</p> + +<p>Therefore, in the present case many grave qualifications are +present, which increase the crime, and on account of these his +Honour, the Advocate of the Poor, admits in § <i>Agnoscit Fiscus</i> +that the penalty should be increased. Nor can such increase +of penalty be made good except by death. For even if the +adultery were proved, as it is not proved in our case, the mere +murder of the wife, when committed after an interval, could +demand only a diminution of penalty, according to the more +lenient opinion. Hence the justice of the decree for the torment +of the vigil should be said to be sufficiently asserted and vindicated +against opposing reasons. And now that confession has +followed, there remains only that condign punishment be inflicted +in expiation of this awful crime.</p> + +<p class="left45 center"> +<span class="smcap">Giovanni Battista Bottini</span>,<br /> +<i>Advocate of the Fisc, and of the Reverend<br /> +Apostolic Chamber</i>.</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft14" id="ft14">File-title of Pamphlet 14.</a>]</p> + +<hr class="l50" /> + +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor in<br /> +Criminal Cases:</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE<br /> +with qualifying circumstance.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For the Fisc, against Count Guido Franceschini<br /> +and the others.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Response of the Lord Advocate of the Fisc.</i></p> + +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> + +<hr class="l50" /> + +</div> + +<p class="center p6 b1">ROMANA HOMICIDIORUM CUM QUALITATE<a name="pamphlet14" id="pamphlet14"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">199</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 14.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2"> +Most Illustrious Lord:</p> + +<p>The matters deduced by his Honour, the Advocate of the +Poor, for the defence of Guido Franceschini, who is accused of +three murders with very grave qualifications which magnify the +same, are of no real force in proving [first] that he should not +be punished with the ordinary penalty of the <i>Lex Cornelia +de Sicariis</i>, inasmuch as he had confessed these crimes, and +[secondly] that simple torture only should be demanded for +gaining the truth as to these, and that the torment of the vigil +should be omitted. I will attempt to show this, in responding +to these points singly, so far as the excessive scantiness of time +admits, and will keep my eyes on the rights of the Fisc, as the +duty of my office and the dire atrocity and inhumanity of the +crime demand.</p> + +<p>The chief ground taken by my Lord consists in placing on an +equality [first] a case of vengeance taken immediately by the +husband with the death of the adulteress found in her sin, and +[second] that of one slain after an interval when the wife is +plainly convicted of adultery (as he claims is proven in our case). +But this falls to the ground both in fact and in law; and hence +the inference for the moderation of the penalty drawn from this +same parity is likewise shown to be without foundation.</p> + +<p>In fact, the proof of the pretended adultery is quite deficient +according to what I deduced fully in my other information. In +that, I have confuted singly his proofs, or rather suspicions, +resulting from the prosecution, to which his Honour attaches +himself. I have shown that the wife's flight in company with +Canon Caponsacchi, the pretended lover, was for a legitimate +reason (namely the imminent and deadly peril, which she feared), +and not from the illicit impulse of lust. The participation and +complicity of the Canon Conti and Signor Gregorio Guillichini, +relatives of the Accused, in forwarding the same, ought to prove +this. For they would not have furnished aid if she were running +away for the evil purpose of violating her conjugal faith, even to +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">200</a></span> +their own dishonour. But they well knew the necessity of the +remedy, and that it was to free her from peril. And a witness +for the prosecution in the same trial for flight swore to having +heard this from Signor Gregorio. And they gave their aid in +carrying this out.</p> + +<p>Nor is it at all relevant that, in the decree in condemnation of +the same Canon to banishment in Civita Vecchia, the title of +"carnal cognition" was written down; because, as was formerly +responded, the alteration of that was demanded, and likewise the +substitution of a general title relative to the trial. And since no +proofs of it resulted either from the prosecution or from the +defences which the unfortunate wife (who was dismissed with the +mere precaution of keeping her home as a prison) could have +made, if she had not been so horribly murdered, and since the +said decree, issued without her having been summoned or heard, +would be void, the inscription made by the judge in the records +as a title could not convict her of that crime; but only the truth +of the fact resulting from the proofs should be considered. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>I acknowledge that the Accused should have been considered +worthy of some excuse if he had slain his wife in the act of taking +her in flight with the pretended lover; since for this purpose, not +merely the absolute proof, but the mere suspicion of adultery +committed, would be enough. [Citation.] But when, after +neglecting the pretended right of private vengeance, he sought +out with entreaty public vengeance, by having her arrested, he +could not thereafter, while she was under the public authority of +the judge, take private vengeance by butchering her who had +no fear of such a thing. The suspicion of a just grievance, which +is difficult to restrain when aroused, excuses the husband in part, +if not entirely, whenever he takes vengeance immediately under +the headlong impetus of anger. But when the vengeance is after +an interval, and while the cause is in the hands of the judge, and +the victim is imprisoned at his own instance, this does not hold +good, as will be proved further on, by showing the irrelevance +of the principle assumed.</p> + +<p>Nor does the glossa in the alleged text, in the law of Emperor +Hadrian, stand in the way; because it speaks of a son taken by +his father in flagrant adultery with his step-mother, and killed +by the father immediately. [Citation.] And there is a wide +difference between a father and a husband killing after an +interval; because, as Farinacci adds, a father has the greatest +authority over his son, and by ancient law could even kill him. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">201</a></span> +And certainly the husband does not have this. The law also +more readily excuses a father, because he is always supposed to +take good counsel for his child, from the mere instinct of paternal +love. But one does not have this same confidence as regards a +husband, who is accustomed to conceive unjust suspicion of his +wife more readily. Hence it is not permitted that he kill her on +mere suspicion after an interval. Nor is he in any way to be +excused on this account, according to the text. [Citation.] +"The devotion of a father's love usually takes good counsel for +his own children, but the hot precipitancy of a furious husband +should readily be restrained." [Citation.]</p> + +<p>This is so far true that a father is not excused unless he kill, or +at least severely wound, his daughter along with the adulterer; +so that it should be attributed to fate, rather than to paternal +indulgence, that she escape death. And this has been passed +by law-makers for no other reason than that such a grievance, +provoking to rash anger, is required for excusing a father, so that +he may not spare his own daughter. But since this statute is +not to be found among the laws about husbands, the manifest +difference between the two, because of the husband's excessive +readiness to seize a suspicion and fly into a rage against his wife, +is plainly revealed.</p> + +<p>Nor is mere suspicion a sufficient ground to diminish the +penalty for a husband who kills his wife after an interval. This +is evident from the very authorities excusing him in such a case, +whenever the adultery is proved either by the confession of the +wife or by other proofs, so that she can be said to be convicted of +it. [Citations.] Bertazzolus says: "I have seen the matter so +regarded in the contingency of such a fact, and the husband has +been excused who had killed an adulterous wife, not found in the +very act, but whose adultery was really and truly existent and +was quite plainly proved." Hence it is plain, from those very +authorities adduced by his Honour, that the husband who kills +his wife after an interval is not excused because of mere suspicion, +or because of an adultery case which is still pending judgment, +and which he himself had brought.</p> + +<p>In law, also, is his assumption proved to be without foundation, +which places on an equality [first] vengeance taken immediately, +that is, in the very act of taking the wife in adultery, or +in acts immediately preparatory, which lead him to such a +legitimate belief; and [secondly] vengeance taken after an +interval, even when the adultery is evident from such proofs as +render it perfectly clear. There are many authorities who urge +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">202</a></span> +the diminution of the penalty for the following reason which they +give—that the sense of injured honour always keeps urging and +provoking to vengeance, and that a wife may be well enough +said to be taken in adultery, when she has either confessed it or +been convicted of it. And these authorities have been collected +with a full hand by his Honour, and I myself recently pointed +out one of them. But the contrary opinion is the true one, and +is accepted in practice. To this fact the most distinguished and +most skilful practitioners of our time in criminal law bear witness. +These are [first] Farinacci, where, after he has first learnedly +answered the reasons and authorities adduced to the contrary, +he concludes that he undoubtedly believes so as to the law in the +case, and counsels that it be so held, unless we wish to err; and +[second] Canon Rainaldi, who also filled the office of Procurator +of the Poor with the highest praise, and so it may well be believed +that he was very strongly inclined toward mercy and commiseration, +and that he therefore adhered to this opinion in the mere +zeal for the truth. And he declared it to be the truer and the +more advantageous to the State, and said that one should not +depart from it in giving judgment. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But even if the conflict of authorities might in some manner +favour the diminishing of the penalty for the Accused, if there +had been excess merely in the matter of time; yet he is still to +be considered as inexcusable, so that he cannot escape the +ordinary penalty, since so many qualifying circumstances are +present which increase the crime; and any one of these is punishable +with death.</p> + +<p>To this end we should first consider the assembling of armed +men, which is so very injurious to the public peace, and constitutes +the crime of "conventicle." In the Banns, chapter 82, +this is punishable with the death of its author. It is also declared +that it is enough to establish this crime if four armed men are +assembled. This had been formerly prohibited under the same +penalty by the seventy-fifth Constitution of Sixtus V. of blessed +memory, which had raised it to the crime of rebellion, for whatever +reason it might be done. Spada proves this fully, asserting +that it should generally be so understood in all cases in which the +assembling of men has been prohibited.</p> + +<p>To escape or evade this capital penalty, it is not a relevant +excuse that a husband may kill an adulterous wife by armed +men brought together. For, however it may be when a husband +wishes to kill his wife taken in adultery, and is afraid that the +armed adulterer can resist him, and that he may have servants +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">203</a></span> +for his aid (in which case he himself cannot take vengeance otherwise +than by calling together helpers, as Caballus advises), yet +in the case of vengeance taken after an interval, and while the +wife is under the power of the judge, and on the mere suspicion +of adultery, such convocation of armed men cannot be said to +be at all permissible. For the seventy-fifth Constitution of +Sixtus V. of blessed memory, prohibits such assembling even +on lawful occasion, as a disturbance of the public peace. +[Citation.] And so it is much more to be prohibited and much +the rather to be expiated with the ordinary penalty both of the +Constitution and of the Banns, since it was made for an illegal +and damnable end, namely to kill his wife, and his father-in-law +and mother-in-law along with her. This is rendered plain by +the assertion of the very authorities who excuse from the ordinary +penalty a husband who takes vengeance after an interval. +And indeed the path of private vengeance, which is hateful to +the law, would be strewn all too broadly if, after the husband +had chosen legal vengeance and had neglected to avenge his +pretended injury in the act of seizing his wife in flight with the +pretended lover, he should be excusable in taking vengeance +after an interval with all security, by means of armed men, and +in killing her while entirely off her guard, and under the power +of the judge, without the slightest risk to himself.</p> + +<p>This is true in spite of the response which might favour him, +that he neglected to take private vengeance because he was +unarmed, and the wife was found in the company of the Canon, +who was a bold, sturdy man. The husband should impute it to +himself if alone and unarmed he was pursuing his wife, fleeing +with the lover. For then he could take associates with better +right, and fully armed could pursue her; and in such a case his +assembling of men would be somewhat excusable. But this is +not so when he takes such awful vengeance after an interval. +For if we consider the reason why a husband killing an adulterer +or his wife is punished with a milder penalty according to the +quality of the persons, if the vengeance follow in the very act—namely, +rash anger, which cannot be restrained—the assembling +of armed men to do that after an interval is plainly revealed to +be illegal. For rash anger would cause him to expose himself +to the risk of resistance by the adulterer, who is not accustomed +to approach unarmed. Because of this risk the penalty is +diminished, since it shows that the husband carelessly exposed +himself thereto, because of the violence of the anger which +blinded him. This is [not] the case in vengeance taken after an +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">204</a></span> +interval, taken with all forethought and by means of armed men, +so that the husband cannot be afraid that any evil will befall +himself in carrying it out. Such preparation is quite repugnant +to rash anger, which cannot be restrained, and from which +excuse is drawn. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>The second qualification that increases the crime results from +the kind of arms with which the murder was committed, for +these were prohibited by the well-known decree of Alexander +VIII. of sacred memory. This was not merely for the carrying, +but even for the keeping, introduction, or manufacture of them +for any cause whatever, even under the pretext of military +service or the execution of justice. Hence they would be all +the more prohibited [when carried] for the purpose of taking +such impious and awful vengeance by the destruction of an +entire family.</p> + +<p>Nor is the carrying of arms in such a case to be confused with +the main crime of murder; because when a greater penalty +might be imposed for the former, as when excuse for the killing is +drawn from injured honour, the carrying of the prohibited arms +comes to be punished with the ordinary penalty. [Citations.] +Nor are the authorities adduced to the contrary worthy of +attention, for they hold good in the circumstance of murder done +in self-defence or because of provocation in a quarrel. [Citation.] +Still further, these are not applicable because they do not speak +within the bounds of the Constitution, which so distinctly +prohibits such arms. For Policardus speaks of the <i>Regula +Pragmatica</i> which takes for granted the qualifying circumstance +of the crime of treachery from the kind of arms, and he asserts +that this order ceases in murder for self-defence, or on provocation +in a quarrel, when committed with the said arms. But this +judgment differs by the whole heaven from the sanction of our +Constitution; because the latter was issued for the very purpose +of entirely exterminating so pernicious a kind of arms.</p> + +<p>The third qualification likewise increasing the crime is murder +committed because of a lawsuit; for by the well-known decree +of Alexander VII. of blessed memory, this was increased to the +crime of rebellion and <i>læsa majestas</i>, punishable with death and +the confiscation of goods. This qualifying circumstance as +regards the slaughter of Pietro and Violante cannot be denied; +because the Accused had won a victory in the lawsuit. And +hence the offence should [not] be said to have been committed +because of just anger for injury inflicted upon him; [first] by +the pretence of birth, which was revealed after the marriage had +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">205</a></span> +been celebrated, in order that they might break the marriage +contract; [second] by the publication of pamphlets greatly to +his injury; and [third] by their conspiracy in the flight of his +wife to the injury of the honour of the Accused and of his entire +family. They claim that since this cause for avenging the +injury is graver than that arising from the lawsuit, the murder +should be attributed to it, as more proportionate thereto.</p> + +<p>But the victory he obtained had regard only to the actual +possession of the property while the lawsuit was under appeal. +And the parents were still pursuing this suit, so that that cause +continued and could not be said to be extinct. The injury, +indeed, from whatever different causes it may be claimed to have +arisen, really came from this same lawsuit. And this had regard +both to the pretence of birth revealed, and to the insults contained +in those pamphlets concerning the meagreness of the +family affairs (which was quite the contrary of the boasted +riches, in the hope of which the marriage had been made), and +concerning the ill-treatment which the parents of the wife had +suffered in the home of the Accused. For by this marriage +agreement food was to be furnished them. Still further, as to +any conspiracy in her flight, much less as to any complicity in +her pretended adultery, we have no proof at all. And so the +cause of hatred conceived because of the lawsuit kept always +urging him, and it does not redeem the criminal from the penalty +inflicted by the decree of Alexander, because the suit might have +been injurious to the Accused, either in his substance or in the +manner. For this indeed presents such a cause as is always +required in premeditated murders. Nor does it exclude the +qualifying circumstance of the lawsuit, and indeed confirms it; +since it is explicitly presupposed that injustice had been committed. +Otherwise an opportunity to take private vengeance +would be permitted, which in all law is forbidden, especially +when a lawsuit is going on; because then the majesty of the +Prince is insulted, as was proved in my other information, +§ <i>Accedit ad exasperandum</i>.</p> + +<p>The fourth and, indeed, a very grave qualifying circumstance +is drawn from the place in which the crime was committed, +namely in the home of those slain. It was also in an insidious +manner, by pretending the delivery of a letter sent by Canon +Caponsacchi. For one's home should be the safest of refuges +to himself, as was proved in our other information, § <i>plurimum +quoque</i>. The manner indeed savours of treachery, as is proved +not merely by committing murder under the show of friendship, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">206</a></span> +but also at a time when the power and obligation of special +caution in the one slain had ceased. [Citation.] And this is +far from doubtful in our case, for the wretched parents could +have had no such apprehension from the Accused, who was +staying in his own country.</p> + +<p>To these is added a fifth very grave qualifying circumstance, +drawn from the place with respect to the very wretched wife. +For she had been imprisoned at the instance of the Accused, +and was detained in the home of her parents as a prison with +the consent of the Abate, his brother; and hence she was under +public safekeeping, which it were wrong for the Accused to +violate without incurring the penalty of <i>læsa majestas</i>. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>This very grave qualifying circumstance, which increases the +crime, cannot be avoided by the dual response given by his +Honour; first, that we are dealing with no prison properly +speaking; second, that one giving offence, or killing in prison, +is excused on a just plea of injured honour. Neither of these +excludes this qualifying crime; for the unsuitability of a prison +would be considerable if we could defend a violation of it made +by one in prison and so to avoid his own injury, but if it were +otherwise when we were arguing in his favour for avenging an +injury to himself in a home assigned as a prison. The plea of +injured honour can help one only if the offence in prison follow +in self-defence under the very impulse of rash anger. In such +circumstances the authorities adduced by his honour would hold +good. But this is not so in excusing vengeance taken after an +interval upon one imprisoned even at the instance of the slayer. +For then the qualifying circumstance of the place greatly +aggravates the crime, as it is indeed injurious to the public +safekeeping and involves treachery, etc.</p> + +<p>It is therefore very evident that the murders committed by +the Accused have many qualifications mingled with them, which +greatly magnify them. And however far the opinion has weight, +which urges the diminution of punishment for one killing an +adulteress after an interval, and however much the pretended +adultery may be declared to have been proved in the manner +required to gain such diminution, even by all those in favour of +the milder judgment, still this penalty, because of these qualifications, +would have to be increased and the ordinary penalty of +the <i>Lex Cornelia de Sicariis</i> in its entirety would have to be +demanded. And therefore it seems superfluous to argue about +the kind of torture, since in view of these very urgent proofs, +of which I understand there is no doubt, and in view of the well-known +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">207</a></span> +powers granted to the Most Illustrious Governor, it is +quite within limits that the crime should be punished with the +ordinary penalty, even if the qualifying circumstance of special +atrocity were not present, so that the penalty should not be +increased on that account.</p> + +<p>But such a qualifying circumstance is not wanting here, as it +results indeed from the treacherous manner and from the charge +of <i>læsa majestas</i>, which is provable in our case on three grounds; +namely offence committed during a lawsuit, the assembling of +armed men, and the violation of public safekeeping, because of +the home assigned as a prison. For according to the Apostolic +Constitutions, the crime would be raised to that degree upon the +basis of the first and the second; and there should be no doubt +as to the power of the Prince to do so. [Citation.] Spada +asserts that in such a case, so far as all the effects of law are concerned, +it should not be considered a matter of controversy that +the qualification of special atrocity, which is in agreement with +such a crime, is to be revoked. And in our very circumstances +Spada gives this opinion in demanding the torment of the vigil.</p> + +<p>Nor can that qualifying circumstance of the person concerned, +so far as it is proved, stand in the way of such infliction of the +torment of the vigil, which does not allow the death penalty upon +a nobleman to be made worse, as is accustomed to happen in +very atrocious crimes (because noble blood should not be +degraded by such increase of penalty which adds infamy). But +for this purpose merely the nature of the crime is considered, and +not the quality of the person, which would hinder the execution +of a penalty carrying with it such infamy. Otherwise the +torture of the vigil never could be inflicted upon noblemen, +priests, and men in religious office upon whom an infamous +penalty cannot be inflicted. But nobility affords no privilege +in the manner of torment, especially in very atrocious crimes +[Citation], etc.</p> + +<p class="left45 center"> +<span class="smcap">Giovanni Battista Bottini</span>,<br /> +<i>Advocate of the Fisc and of the Apostolic Chamber</i>.</p> + +<p class="p6 b1 center"><a name="pamphlet15" id="pamphlet15"></a>RESPONSE</p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">209</a></span></p> + +<p class="center"><i>To the Account of the Fact, and Grounds in the Franceschini Case.</i></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 15.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2">The splendid statue of Nebuchadnezzar fell because it was not +firm on its feet. So fall to ground those imagined and forced +suppositions concerning the origin of the present execrable +murder, which the Anonymous Writer in his printed pages +[<a href="#pamphlet10">Pamphlet 10]</a> has tried to insinuate into the dull heads of the +crowd. This murder was committed here in Rome upon three +wretched and innocent persons, by Guido Franceschini, assisted +by four men who were armed with prohibited arms, who were +brought together for that purpose by the influence of money, +and who were kept insidiously for many days at his expense. +[These pages claim that] the crime arose from justly conceived +anger: [first] because eight months earlier Guido had discovered +Francesca Pompilia, his wife, sinning against him in his own +house at Arezzo, and [then] because she had fled in company +with Canon Caponsacchi of the same city back to Rome to place +herself again under the protection of Pietro and Violante Comparini, +who had raised her as their daughter; and [thirdly] that +the suspicion had also grown upon Guido that in her precipitate +journey she might have broken with the Canon her marriage +obligations, since certain love-letters were found upon her, from +which he unreasonably deduced her adultery, and he supposed +that the said Caponsacchi was condemned as an adulterer to a +three years' banishment at Civita Vecchia. And these pages +try, under the pretence of injured honour, to render Guido's +crime less grave and to excite compassion, no less in foolish +persons than in the hearts of our most religious judges, for the +purpose of disposing them toward a milder penalty and one out +of keeping, according to the laws, with the quality, form, and +circumstances of this crime. And this in substance is all that is +claimed by the author of the pamphlet entitled <i>Notizie di fatto, e +di ragione nella Causa Franceschini</i>. But they are indeed very +much at fault in their account of that tragic history, which +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">210</a></span> +had a different beginning and an occasion independent of the +imagined ground of honour. In that pamphlet it was presupposed +all too bitterly, that Guido's honour had been injured by +his wife; whereas she always preserved her sense of shame and +had well observed the laws of conjugal honour, as is plainly +shown in this present article.</p> + +<p>That this sad catastrophe, this slaughter of an entire family, +did not proceed (as the Anonymous Author claims in his pages) +from the pretended sense of injured honour, but from damnable +greed, one can very clearly see by considering the fact that for +this very object the unfortunate marriage with Francesca Pompilia +was entered into by Franceschini. For it was taken for +granted that after the death of her supposed parents she would +surely fall heir to a considerable property. All the more ought +we believe that the crime was committed because of hatred +arising from the three lawsuits then pending; that is, two in the +civil courts and a third in the criminal courts. One of these +was as to the legitimacy of the parentage of Francesca Pompilia, +the wife, and the nullification of the dowry-agreement, and was +brought by Pietro in the Tribunal of the Sacred Rota. The +second suit was for divorce, and was brought by the said Francesca +Pompilia before the Vice-Governor. The third is a criminal +suit, as to the pretended adultery, which is still pending in the +Tribunal of his Excellency the Governor; this latter was brought +under the very impulse of greed, to gain the entire dowry. +Since this fact was conclusively evident in the case introduced +by the said Franceschini, he was deceived in this hope of gain +by the failure of the proofs, which the defence caused to vanish +utterly, as they could do by means of the wife. Hence he broke +into an excess so tragic and so deplorable as to reveal clearly +the tricks and frauds practised for the purpose of bringing about +that marriage. Here then are the plain proofs that this is the +truth.</p> + +<p>Guido Franceschini was staying at Rome in idleness, out of the +service of a certain Cardinal, without a soldo, by which service +he had provided for himself up to that time. His usual loafing-place +was in the shop of certain women-hairdressers, where he +often announced his intention of setting up his house with some +good dowry. He also boasted of the grandeur of his country, +his birth, and his property. By his promises he induced this +woman to find him a chance for such a marriage, and she informed +him of the opportunity in the said Francesca Pompilia. +The latter was then esteemed to be the true and legitimate +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">211</a></span> +daughter of Pietro and Violante Comparini. He set about this +enterprise with the aid of his brother, Abate Paolo, using the +astute prudence with which the malign serpent advanced his +designs in Paradise to subvert Adam into disobeying God's +precept and into eating the forbidden fruit; for [Satan] considered +the matter in this way: "If I wish to assault the man +directly, who is so strong and so resolute, he will turn and give +me a sure repulse. It is therefore better that I first tempt the +woman, who is of a fickle nature and soft-hearted." And he +made his first attack upon Eve; because when he had gained his +point that he might have her, by her means it would be easier +for him to win over Adam. "For he first attacked the mind of +the weaker sex," are the ingenious words of St. Hilary.</p> + +<p>And so for this purpose did the said Guido devise the marriage +with the knowledge of his brother, Abate Paolo, and likewise +to this point he succeeded in it. For he avoided talking with +Signor Pietro about the marriage, by whom it would probably +have been refused, and wished first to tempt Violante, his wife. +Because by gaining her he would the more easily overpersuade +her husband to give his consent. Nor was it difficult for him +to astound the woman, because he knew how to impress her very +well with the thought of the grandeur of his country, of the first-rate +nobility of his birth, and of the great income from his +patrimony, amounting to 1700 scudi. And he gave her an +itemised account of it written with his own hand. She was +enchanted thereby and, without getting any further information +about the matter, she was able to persuade her husband and to +extract from him his consent to it. This proves what we read +written in Proverbs: "A wife takes captive the soul of her +husband." He speaks this of Mordecai who availed himself of +Esther, when he wished to placate the anger of Ahasuerus against +his people; of Joab, who used the services of the woman of Tekoah +when he wished to soften the anger of David against his son; and +of the Philistines of Timnath, when they wished to gain from +Samson the secret of the riddle proposed to them at the marriage +feast.</p> + +<p>The credulous but deceived woman so cajoled her husband +that she at last induced him to sign the marriage agreement +providing for a dowry of 26 bonds and, at the death of the said +Comparini, for all their possession, amounting, as the Anonymous +Writer acknowledges, to the sum of 12,000 scudi. And, for the +purpose of making the said Franceschini guardians of the said +property even during the life of the Comparini, they had to give +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">212</a></span> +up even the income of it. This property consisted of numbers +of profitable and well-situated houses, and of bonds. The +Franceschini also assumed the obligation to take the said Comparini +to the city of Arezzo, and there to feed, clothe, and provide +them such service as they would need. This promise was made +not without the hope that on account of the insults and sufferings +which they would have to bear their death would be +hastened. And thus Guido would become the absolute master +of their property.</p> + +<p>After having signed the said agreement Pietro absolutely +refused to go on with the effectuation of the marriage of the +said Francesca Pompilia, with the abovesaid Guido, of whom +he had had few good reports; and these were far different from +the pretended riches and vaunted nobility. Hence one may +well say of him what Persius concludes in his fourth Satire: +"See what has no real existence; let the rabble carry off their +presents elsewhere. Dwell with yourself, and you will know +how meagre your furnishing may be."</p> + +<p>At any rate, the said Guido joined the said Violante, whom +he had imbued with his flatteries and endearments, spurning +any further consent of Pietro by keeping him in ignorance of it. +And without the knowledge of the latter, Guido contracted the +marriage with the said Francesca Pompilia in the face of the +Church. And he evermore discloses by this act, which shows so +little reverence to the promiser of the dowry, his own greed, +not merely for the amount which had been assigned to him in +the marriage agreement, but also for the rest of Pietro's property. +For he felt sure that after Pietro's death the property, by the +entail of the ancestors, would necessarily fall to the said +Francesca Pompilia, who was already his wife.</p> + +<p>When, after a few days, Pietro found out that the marriage +had taken place, though he reproved the deed vigorously, yet +because what is done cannot be undone, and by means of the +cajoleries of Violante his wife, and the interposition of another +Cardinal, whom the Abate, Guido's brother, served, the poor old +fellow was constrained to drink the cup of his bitterness. And +he came, as it were by force, after many months to the stipulations +of the dowry agreement. He quickly began to feel the +effects of Franceschini's trick, since Guido had scarcely a single +soldo of his own to pay the first expenses of that marriage agreement. +Hence, to supply these, he was obliged, against the wish +of Pietro, to free from entail five of the bonds, or more, by the +authority of the Auditor of the Most Illustrious Governor, and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">213</a></span> +to sell them for meeting these expenses. Hence one may see +clearly that the primary object of Franceschini in this proceeding +was to trick Pietro, and Violante his wife, and their poor child, +to enrich himself with the property of others.</p> + +<p>He can no longer deny the fraudulent pretence of vaunted +riches of the Franceschini in the note written in his own hand +and given to the Comparini. And indeed the Anonymous +Writer confesses it openly. For, in order to free Abate Paolo +from complicity in that trick, the latter pretended that he took +Guido his brother to task roundly for the alteration of the said +note. The said Comparini very quickly found this out. For +as soon as they had gone to Arezzo they learned that the property +of the Franceschini family was very slight. And such were the +miseries and abuses that the Comparini had to suffer in victuals +and in harsh treatment that they were obliged to return to +Rome after a few months; for they were locked out of the home +and had to go to the tavern to lodge; and these abuses were +for the purpose of shortening their lives, either by their sufferings, +or the fury caused thereby. And this fact is very evidently +proved by the rent-rolls taken from the public records of the +city of Arezzo. From these it is shown that the said Guido +did not possess a single dollar's worth of the settled property +mentioned in the said note. It is also untrue that he and his +family enjoyed the highest rank of nobility in the city, because, +from other extracts drawn from the public records of the city, +it is evident that his family is of only secondary rank.</p> + +<p>The abovesaid crafty and fraudulent methods of dealing, which +came to light long before the murder had followed, and which +became known in this Court and in Arezzo, can well show that +greed was the origin of this premeditated slaughter (which was +put in execution in such a horrible manner, as is notorious) and +not the pretended ground of injured honour. For, according +to common opinion, Abate Paolo, no less than Guido his brother, +had worked the tricks exposed as above. And by men they were +suspected of subterfuge and craft, so that this made them more +sensible of injury than anything else. Hence they could no +longer boast the grandeur of their nobility and the affluence of +their riches, which they had spread abroad on the lips of the +crowd. And every one avoided having anything to do with +them, as persons of bad faith and as usurping a glory to which +they had no real right.</p> + +<p>The greediness of this self-interest became greatly inflamed; +so that in these Franceschini brethren one may see the common +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">214</a></span> +axiom verified: "Craft is deluded by craft." That is to say, +Violante was urged on by remorse of conscience and by the +abuses and injuries received in their house, and was constrained +by her confessor at the time of the Jubilee to reveal to Pietro, +her husband, that the said Francesca Pompilia was not their +daughter, but was of a false birth. And this seems very probable +in view of the age of 48, which Violante had reached, when she +pretended to be pregnant with her; because in the fourteen +years, during which she had lived in lawful matrimony with +Pietro, she had never had children. Also, by witnesses then +living, she could afford conclusive proof of the pretence of the +birth. And when notice of that had been given to Abate Paolo, +that he might come to some compromise over the annulling +of the dowry contract for the entire patrimonial property, he +spurned the kind offers made to him through the meditation of +friendly persons and refused every means of peace. Then a +warning (as to the falsity of the said birth and the illegality +of the dowry contract) was served on him by Pietro before +Monsignor Tomati. And conclusive proof of the birth was given +by six witnesses, who were examined before the judge with +questions offered in behalf of the said Franceschini. Yet the +same judge saw best to forward the case during the mere +immediate possession, by continuing to the said Francesca +Pompilia the quasi-possession of her parenthood. Nevertheless, +an appeal was taken from his sentence, and it was committed +to the Sacred Rota, before Monsignor Molines, where it still +hangs undecided as to the principal point of the pretended +parentage and the nullity of the dowry contract. For righteous +judgment in such a tribunal the judge doubtless awaited for +conclusive proofs of the said pretence of birth. The nullity of +the dowry contract would none the less be decided, because it +had made declaration that the said Francesca Pompilia was +their daughter. And with this falsehood the advantage which +the Franceschini had obtained for their own selfish gain by such +tricks would cease.</p> + +<p>All this is proved by the reflection that the trick of Franceschini +was made public, not merely in Rome, but in Arezzo, and +that he also was deluded by a similar artifice because of the +proofs already made, while judgment was pending, that the said +Francesca Pompilia was not the real and legitimate daughter of +the said Comparini. On the ground of these far-fetched suspicions +Guido made pretence of a reason for maltreating her with insults +and blows, and more than once he provided himself with a sword +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">215</a></span> +and fire-arms to take her life. He did this to take vengeance +upon her for his own trick, by which he had been deluded. +Therefore it was quite right for the poor wife, who was of the +tender age of sixteen years and a stranger in the place, to avoid +the rage of her husband at different times by fleeing for protection +to Monsignor the Bishop, and to the Governor, or +Commissioner of the City, that they might put some check +upon the cruelties she was suffering. And although these +persons by their interest in the matter succeeded for the time +in putting a stop to the threats, yet the poor intimidated wife +always passed her days shut in a room. And her fear was +greatly increased because she saw that the said Guido had made +a mixture of poison, with which he threatened he would take +her life without the uproar attendant on the use of arms; and +thus he would be the surer of his crime going unpunished. Now +if, even at a time when no shadow of suspicion of dishonour had +fallen, the husband was contriving the death of his wife, the +Anonymous Writer might well abstain from soiling his pages for +the purpose of proving that the slaughter of those murdered +had had its origin in the impulse to repair offended honour. For +his pages would have had much better foundation if he had +consulted the truth, namely that these crimes had arisen from +deluded self-interest.</p> + +<p>The poor wife in her agitation over these difficulties that we +have told, had nothing else to do but think of finding refuge from +the death she feared. And when her mind was somewhat +sharpened by its vexations, she intrusted herself to the Canon +Conti, who is closely related to the Franceschini, and declared +to him her miseries, her perils, and her just fears (although they +were not unknown to him), in order that he might try to give her +consolation by placing her life in safety. He was touched with +living compassion and was moved to free her therefrom by pity +for the grievous state in which she was. And he well knew that +there was no other escape than flight from the home of her +husband, according to the saying of the poet [Virg. A. III. 44]: +"Alas, flee the cruel earth, flee the greedy shore." But not +being able to give her aid in this affair, he suggested to her that +for putting the matter into execution, there was no better person +to the purpose than Canon Giuseppe Caponsacchi, his friend and +intimate, whose spirit had stood every test. And when Conti +had spoken of it to him, although Caponsacchi saw difficulty in +aiding the desire of the young woman, because he did not wish +to incur the anger of the Franceschini, yet at last the impulse of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">216</a></span> +charity and pity prevailed upon him to free this innocent woman +from death. And when his readiness for the attempt was +reported to her by Conti, she did not fail to inflame him with +more messages and letters, even containing alluring endearments, +for the effecting of her escape. Yet she also kept during all this +time her constant desire of not violating her marriage-vow, since +in some of these letters she praises the Canon for his chastity, +and in others reproves him for having sent her some rather improper +octaves. She also warned him against degenerating from +the good behaviour, on which she had congratulated herself and +had planned with him the flight.</p> + +<p>While her husband and the whole household were asleep, both +of them, with the assistance of the Canon Conti, set out upon a +headlong journey by post, without losing a moment's time, +except for changing horses; and they arrived by night at +Castelnuovo. And although the host had prepared a bed for +rest, nevertheless they did not avail themselves of it. For +Caponsacchi was always solicitously watching to see that the +driver prepared other horses, to continue the journey to its end. +Nor did the host of that tavern, when cross-examined in the +prosecution for flight, ever dream of bearing witness that the +wife and Caponsacchi had slept together in the bed that was +prepared, even though Franceschini, to his own dishonour, had +published the contrary, that he might, by the pretence of injured +honour, throw a false light upon the true grounds of the murders +committed by him.</p> + +<p>In the meantime her husband arrived. When his wife saw +him, did she, timid as she was, shrink back? Did she acknowledge +herself guilty of any sin, or of any wrong done to him in +guarding her purity and modesty? No! But all on fire, though +she was at the tender age of sixteen years, as I have already said, +the constancy of her own honour rebuked him for the tricks and +abuses which he had employed, and for the threats and blows he +had very often given her, and for the poisonous drugs he had +prepared to take her life. And [she declared] that she had been +obliged to do as she had done, to find an escape by flight from +graver peril, and to return to the parental love of the Comparini, +who had raised her as their daughter; and that she had always +been careful to keep her wifely honour intact. The same rebuke +was made by Caponsacchi, who during the flight had religiously +observed the limits of due modesty.</p> + +<p>What did Franceschini answer? What did he try to do, +although he was armed with a sword against his defenceless wife +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">217</a></span> +and against Caponsacchi, who had with him only a little dagger? +Nothing, indeed! according to what the witnesses who were +present deposed; because he stood convicted by the just remonstrances +of his wife. But what did he do? He gave up all +vengeance, which by right of natural law, or much more by civil +law, he might have taken for that; and, as the Anonymous +Writer goes on to boast in justifying him for this execrable crime, +he implored the arm of the Law and had his wife and Caponsacchi +arrested by the authorities of the place. And at his own +instance they were conducted as prisoners to the prisons of the +Most Illustrious Governor of Rome, before whom Guido charged +them with flight. Then, not content with this, he brought +forward that other charge of supposed adultery committed with +the said Caponsacchi. He also outdid himself greatly by making +noisy petition to the Supreme Pontiff for their punishment, and +the latter sent back his entreaties to Monsignor the Governor. +He was brazen enough to demand, with a new complaint, that +his wife should be declared an adulteress and that to him, according +to law, should pass all the gain of the dowry. This in substance +clearly proves that he did not insist on vengeance for the +reparation of his honour, which he himself had passed by, but +he did all this for the sole object of gain, that is to win the dowry.</p> + +<p>What efforts, what exclamations, what diligence did Franceschini +and Abate Paolo, his brother, not use to have the wife +declared an adulteress and to gain the desired lucre? Monsignor +the Most Illustrious Governor knows it, who endured with +all forbearance their passionate pressure upon him. Signor +Venturini, judge in the case, knows it. And all the other judges +and notaries of the Court, who were nauseated by their importunity, +know this very well. Then since judgment could not in +any event fall according to the designs of the Franceschini, as +there was no proof in the trial of any offence, either in the wife +or in the said Caponsacchi, the most Religious Judges, who in +prudence were judging rigorously (for the purpose of giving +some satisfaction to the Franceschini brothers in their strong +insistence, rather than because of the obligations of justice), +banished the said Caponsacchi to Civita Vecchia for three years. +Caponsacchi straightway obeyed this sentence, and has never +left the place assigned him. The case was left undecided as +regards the wife, who was placed in the Nunnery of the Scalette +as a prison. Then when there was some question as to her +pregnancy, with equal prudence, she was removed from the +nunnery by the order of the Most Illustrious Governor; for it was +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">218</a></span> +not decorous that she should give birth to a child there. And +with the consent of the said Abate Paolo she was placed in the +home of the said Comparini under security of 300 scudi to keep +it as a secure prison.</p> + +<p>On this point the Anonymous Writer disputes too bitterly +what was written learnedly by the Fisc, and claims that the +consent of the said Abate Paolo had not been given. But the +great and incorruptible integrity of the Fisc is known to every +one; because of which he would be unwilling to give his word in +writing for what was not evident on the surest proof. Yet the +fact of Abate Paolo's consent is plainly proved, since he in person +so agreed with Monsignor the Most Illustrious Governor and +with Signor Venturini, the judge, jointly. And he exacted from +Pietro Comparini the obligation to supply her with food without +any hope of recompense. And this was so carried out, although +the quality of the Comparini did not deserve so indecent a rebuke +on account of having been too indulgent with them.</p> + +<p>With like bitterness it is denied that the said Abate Paolo had +power of attorney from Guido, his brother, enough to give such +consent; because, in making such a provision, Monsignor the +Governor had no need of the consent of the parties. And, even +if he had wished to show Abate Paolo such courtesy and urbanity, +the Author should not reply thereto with such incivility, in +criticising the judge for having done wrong because of the lack +of that power of attorney. For by such procedure [Abate +Paolo] proves that he wished to trick also Monsignor the Governor +into consenting to a thing beyond his power. And he rests convicted +of this, because the said Abate Paolo was the manipulator +of all they did, nor was a straw moved without his assistance. +And he was well provided with abundant power of attorney by +his brother, wherefrom he had the fullest authority to do as if +he were the very person of his brother, with a proviso of after +confirmation, the efficacy of which every one knows. And this +is confessed even by the Anonymous Author, since he asserts +that Guido at his departure left the entire conduct of his case to +the Abate, his brother. But one may well see with what object +he denies the said consent, that is, in order that he may more +bitterly make pretence of the complicity of the Comparini in the +pretended dishonesty of Francesca, who had been guarded by +them as a daughter. This would seem very improbable if he +should once admit the consent of the Abate.</p> + +<p>No less rancorous is the assertion made by the Anonymous +Writer that Lamparelli laid out the money to provide Pompilia +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">219</a></span> +with food while she was in safekeeping. Nor was Lamparelli +reimbursed by the deposit in the Office, which had come from +the money found on her and on Caponsacchi, when they were +arrested at Castelnuovo, which was supposed to have been stolen +from the husband. But the 48 scudi, which the wife confessed +to have taken away from him, were fully restored to the said +Abate Paolo, as is proved by his receipt, made during the trial. +The rest of the money was conclusively proved to belong to +Caponsacchi. And as soon as Abate Paolo received the money, +for which he continually clamoured, he left Rome to take part +in the planning of that notorious murder, which followed a little +while later.</p> + +<p>But there had previously been given notice, at the instance of +Francesca Pompilia before Monsignor the Vice-Governor, of a +suit for divorce and for the recovery of the dowry, which had +been spent. This was very bitter to the Franceschini, because +in that lawsuit conclusive proof would be made of their subterfuges, +their cruelties, their threats of poisonous drugs that had +been prepared; of which the Canon Conti, who was the mediator +in that flight, had not been ignorant. And it is public talk and +report throughout Arezzo that he died about a month ago under +similar suspicious circumstances. Hereby ceased all hope, +which the Franceschini had had from the beginning, of gaining +the entire property of the Comparini. And from this, every +sane mind may see and know what is the true root of such rash +and pitiable murders; whether it is injured honour, or scandalous +and detestable greed and cupidity. From this arose the +hatred in the lawsuits brought and still undecided, which drew +even greater dishonour upon the said Franceschini, and when +decided would be for their ruin.</p> + +<p>In vain therefore this Anonymous Writer and his other defenders +wear themselves out in exaggerating the plea of injured +honour. For then that which had no true existence would have +been taken from Guido by his wife. This was fully proved in +the arguments made for the Fisc, in answering those letters, +from which Guido drew his strongest proof. On the contrary, +Franceschini has by his own deed renounced all right to repair +his honour, since he did not avenge it at the time of overtaking +her in the said inn of Castelnuovo. Nor does his excuse really +help him—that he was unarmed, because he had with him indeed +a sword, and possibly other concealed arms. For it is not +probable that he would have been willing to go on following his +wife accompanied by Caponsacchi, without being provided with +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">220</a></span> +arms. And this all the more because the fugitives also were +unarmed and were provided merely with a little dagger. But +Guido preferred to choose the judicial road and had them +arrested by the police, and he demanded that the charge against +them be pushed through to their punishment, even imploring +the rescript of the Supreme Pontiff. He also laid his entreaties +again before the judges in the case (this very well discloses his +purpose, which was the unconquerable motive of all his acts) +and made special insistence before them for the payment of the +price of the honour, which he pretended had been taken from him. +And would he not even have had his wife declared an adulteress +for the sake of gaining the dowry? If then he has, as one may +say, demanded the price of his honour in the Courts, how can he +be permitted to commit such awful murders for honour's sake?</p> + +<p>For whenever a husband is permitted by reason of natural +law, or even by the civil law, to kill his wife for honour's sake, +this power and faculty ceases whenever the husband has renounced +it by imploring, as above, the arm of the law. And +these complaints that he made, and his recourse to the Pope, +show the price he put upon his honour. And with these judicial +proceedings he lost, without doubt, his right of private vengeance +for his injured honour, which he might have carried out. And +by this one tacit renunciation, this right is extinct. [Citation.] +For the writer cannot claim that the judicial action brought +by Franceschini would not effect the renunciation of private +vengeance for his honour, but that he could still employ the one +or the other, and avail himself of whichever might seem better +to him. For this is contrary to the text [Citation] which is stated +as follows by the celebrated Canonist, Giovanni Andrea: "A +choice cannot gain both alternatives in seeking confirmation +therefrom; even if the one is claimed to include that by which +the man can attain the end of his intention. Therefore a man +must choose one, and when it is chosen he cannot turn to the +other." And still clearer are the following words of the same +authority: "The right to return to a second alternative shall +not at all be allowed, when one seems to have renounced to +choose the first and to profess that his rights cannot arise +therefrom."</p> + +<p>But although this exception from every miscarried law might +be judged permissible, every foundation of it would be destroyed +by the utter lack of proof of an offence received in his honour; +for there was no proof of it in the prosecution for flight. The +Anonymous Writer strives to deduce that from the pretended +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">221</a></span> +love-letters written to Caponsacchi, which were denied by +Francesca and were not proved to be her handwriting, either +by her own acknowledgment or by her signature. One cannot +claim that she was convicted of it, nor that any legitimate proof +of it resulted, as all judicial practice shows.</p> + +<p>And even if without reason we were obliged to acknowledge +that they were written by her, would it not be too bitter and too +unreasonable an inference that from them arose the husband's +motive for killing her because she had written them? No one +of sound mind will be persuaded to pity the husband who has +gone on to kill his wife for the sole reason that she had written +love-letters. For conjugal honour is offended neither by note, +nor by pen, but only by acts of impure dishonour; and of this, +in our case, every shadow of proof is lacking.</p> + +<p>This is all the more true because the mere suspicion of dishonour +ceases with a thought of the true motive, for which the +letters were written; namely, by pretended demonstration of +affection to allure this Caponsacchi to rescue her from imminent +peril of death. Nor from this could she find any other escape +than by flight; for she was always terrorised by the anger and +hatred conceived by her husband for feigned reasons. And +therefore, as the love-letters arose from that occasion they ought +to be referred to it, and not to a dishonourable wish to smirch +her conjugal faith to her husband. To the same cause, likewise, +should certain conversations be referred, which she had had +from the window with the said Caponsacchi in order to arrange +the manner of saving her life, and not to give offence, nor to +hazard her own modesty, nor the honour of her husband. Even +the most chaste of women have used like artifices. We find in +the Sacred Scriptures that Judith entrapped Holofernes in the +same way, for the purpose of winning the liberty of her native +land. And so it may be no less permissible for this poor woman, +who was solely intent upon the security of her life, to allure +Caponsacchi by amatory letters to be a safe companion for her +in her flight, and this without any stigma of immodesty.</p> + +<p>Much less can an offence of his honour be inferred from the +flight; because, as I noted above, this flight resulted from the +cause declared. And one may see clearly that it was not for +doing any injury to her husband. For the fugitives did not +turn aside into unknown places, but they journeyed precipitately +along the consular road by post, without spending the night +anywhere. And their journey was toward Rome, where the +poor wife hoped that the Comparini, who had raised her as their +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">222</a></span> +daughter, would continue toward her those acts of love with +which they had brought her up, even till the said marriage was +contracted with Franceschini.</p> + +<p>And all that is being reported that a driver testifies he had +seen them kissing along the road has no legal foundation. For it +rests merely on the word of a single witness of the lowest class, +and he swears to matters that are quite improbable, because he +had to drive the carriage with such rapidity as that with which +the fugitives were following their journey. Hence it was almost +impossible for him to look backward, or to see what they were +doing inside of that covered carriage. And this is all the more +so because his deposition is vague, nor does it specify whether +the kisses were given at night or by day. But his deposition is +rendered much more doubtful and improbable because, in such +a swift journey as the carriage was making, it might chance +during the jolting of it that the accident of their faces meeting +casually would arise, and to him this might seem the act of +kissing. This happens very commonly, even when one is making +no such journey, according to the quality of the road and the +rough ways which one finds. This makes his testimony insufficient +and doubtful enough or, even further, it is audacious +and incredible.</p> + +<p>Then as to the other point which the Anonymous Writer +asserts too bitterly, namely, that when they arrived at Castelnuovo +the innkeeper was ordered to make up only one bed for +the repose of the fugitives, and that they slept together. The +host however did not have the hardihood to swear, in his cross-examination, +that they had slept together in it. This circumstance +is excluded by the deposition of the wife as well as by +that of Caponsacchi. Because their affidavits constantly affirm +that neither of them went to bed for rest, but that merely the +wife, who was worn out by the discomfort and suffering of so +precipitate a journey, rested for a few hours seated in a chair; +and that the bed was left arranged as the host had adjusted it; +and it would have been found mussed, if they had slept in it. +It is also proved that when Franceschini arrived at the said +place he found Caponsacchi urging that the horses be harnessed +for continuing the journey, and no proof is given to the contrary. +Nor can one justly pity Franceschini for his injured honour, +which had been kept intact by the fugitives.</p> + +<p>Likewise the title, to which the same Writer appeals—that +the decree of condemnation for Caponsacchi's banishment had +been inflicted because of criminal knowledge, to the injury of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">223</a></span> +Guido's honour—has no real foundation; because this title +was corrected as untrue, and not in accord with the proofs. Of +this fact we may have as legitimate witnesses the very Governor +himself, and all the judges and notaries of the tribunal who +have any part in the criminal court. And if one will only give +it due thought, the title of that case was placed there, just as a +wine bush hangs outside the door of an inn, which very well +shows that they sell wine there, but does not prove whether +what they sell is good, and saleable, and agreeable. Oh! by no +means. For one may find the wine there to be sharp, and +muddy, and of other inferior qualities. If therefore we read the +documents and the proofs registered during the prosecution, +by which the crime is proved, and not by the erroneous title, +which cannot offer a shadow of proof for the pretended criminal +commerce, there is even less suspicion of immodesty. And one +can well understand that all proof was lacking during the +prosecution from the mildness of the penalty inflicted, which +does not at all correspond with the gravity of the crime charged. +One can also see the impropriety of condemning Caponsacchi +as an adulterer while the cause against the wife was still pending; +because she could not be condemned while undefended.</p> + +<p>But to remove every suspicion of this pretended adultery, I +beg any dispassionate reader to reflect that the adultery could +not have been committed in Arezzo, because to the guardianship +of her husband was added that of the brothers, of their common +mother, of the servant, of the relatives, and of the neighbours; +yea, the voluntary imprisonment of the unfortunate child, who +was always shut in a small room to guard her honour. Much +less could adultery have been committed during the journey, as +has been proved to be utterly unlikely, improbable, unproved, +and far from the truth. Nor could it have been committed at +Rome; for it is well known that Pompilia was taken from +Castelnuovo to prison, and from there was removed to the +Nunnery of the Scalette, and then because of her pregnancy was +consigned to the said Comparini, under the form of keeping +their house as a prison with security of 300 scudi. Caponsacchi +also was staying then at his place of banishment in Civita +Vecchia. In this fact all suspicion ceases, since the consent of +Abate Franceschini, who is so zealous for his brother's honour, +as well as his own, concurred therein.</p> + +<p>Nor can one restrain himself without strong exertion when +he hears such exaggeration from the Anonymous Writer as that +Caponsacchi left his prison to go in banishment to Civita +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">224</a></span> +Vecchia at a time when the wife was staying in the house of +the said couple, as a prison, and that he lodged in their house. +But he cannot speak a more barefaced lie than that, because +Caponsacchi has never been their guest, and as soon as he left +the prison he went to the place of his exile; and he has faithfully +observed his banishment without ever returning to Rome. +Nor did the wife leave the nunnery before it was proved to +Monsignor the Governor that Caponsacchi was staying in Civita +Vecchia, as was established by the authentic testimony of the +Chancellor of that district.</p> + +<p>The said Writer, however, gives me even more room to blame +his excessive boldness in stigmatising the honour of Franceschini +as sullied by his wife, by saying that as soon as Guido had +ascended the stairs in company with his fellows, armed to commit +this execrable murder, he looked about upon those walls, which +were all full of his insults, as if the said silent stones had known +how to make contrivances of foolish thoughts to foment his +inhumanity for so horrible a murder. Because for this he can +give no other proof than that he was writing fancifully without +any foundation. For Guido was indeed willingly dishonoured; +because to his other dishonours he added these disgraces also, +even by his own wrongdoing. For it is made very clear above +that the cause for which he committed the crime was not to +repair his honour, which had been injured by his wife. But it +was his unmasked tricks, the hoped-for lucre, which had +vanished, and the lawsuits still pending.</p> + +<p>And why can he not bring some other no less convincing +proof, if honour urged Franceschini thereto? And was not that +honour sufficiently avenged by the death of his wife? Why +imbrue himself straightway with the blood of Violante and +Pietro, who were not accomplices in the pretended dishonour? +And why should he lay such plots through many days to procure +the death of that kindly benefactor, because the latter had been +moved by pity and had ministered to their aid in the said lawsuits? +Upon that one there has never fallen a suspicion +prejudicial to Guido's honour. For while the wife was in Arezzo +he was staying at Rome. And when she was first married she +was not fully thirteen years old, and after her flight, when she +had returned to Rome, we know that she continued under guard +in prison, or in the nunnery, and then in the home of her parents, +and at this time she was very near her confinement. Hence +one can conclude truly that the motive of this murder was other +than that of honour, and that it was his greed, as was said, and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">225</a></span> +the lawsuits, as Franceschini himself confesses in his cross-examination.</p> + +<p>Nor ought the declaration made by the said wife in the face +of death be despised, since in the presence of many priests and +persons who are quite trustworthy, even while she was constantly +suffering from such severe wounds, she maintained and professed +with greatest frankness that she had always lived chaste +and faithful to her husband. And with a heart in fullest +resignation to the Divine Mercy, she prayed pardon for every +mistake she had committed to the disgrace of her husband. +Nor in such a matter is it to be presumed that the one dying +lies, at the risk of the eternal safety of her soul. A person +should also reflect that in this deed there occurs a special favour +from the hand of the very Omnipotent, who caused the wife to +survive for a few days, in order that she might make clear her +own innocence and throw light upon the murderers; for without +this the crimes would have gone unpunished. For during the +same crime Franceschini had repeatedly commanded his companions +to see if she were quite dead. And when they had +taken her by the tresses and had lifted her from the ground +where she lay, they believed she was dead; because the poor +wife, by natural instinct, knew how to feign it by her relaxation, +as the delinquents confessed. And this mark of divine favour +all the more verifies the declaration of the wife, which has been +proved by the confession of those guilty of the crime.</p> + +<p>I have left it for the last to discuss and refute what the said +Writer pretends concerning Abate Paolo. But if he had to +speak the truth, he might reasonably affirm that the Abate had +been the whole foundation of this scandal. For he had urged +Guido on to the murders, and he had woven the whole plot, +inasmuch as it was he who, from the beginning, wished to attain, +by dint of industry and trickiness, the marriage of the said +Francesca Pompilia. It was he who had sustained the suits, +both civil and criminal, and he who, under the name of a grandee, +and by boasting of their word of honour, had tried to extort a +judgment by means of fine insinuations, by subterfuge, and by +trickery; which was not right. It was he, who was very sensible +of having been proved to be the man of guile, who had been +deluded by his own trick. Therefore this Writer had good +reason to say that the faces of others served the Abate as +mirrors by which to read his own evil courses, and not the lost +honour of his brother.</p> + +<p>I forbear to respond to what the Anonymous Writer has tried +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">226</a></span> +to have believed to the praise of Abate Paolo Franceschini, to +excite greatly our pity; since the intention of the author of the +present response is no other than to make clear the falsity of the +suppositions against the honour of the poor wife and against the +Comparini, and to serve the cause of justice. And he leaves the +judgment of it to those who have full knowledge of it. From +the same consideration I pass over responding to many another +impropriety, which has been advanced uselessly and without any +point by the said Writer.</p> + +<p>And I close my response with the example of Samson, alleged +by him. When he saw himself exposed to the public scoffs of +the people, he gave a shove to the pillars of the palace, causing it +to fall that he might die with the rest under its ruins, and might +cease to be longer the scorn of that people. So lest the said +Franceschini may be ridiculed for his tricks, it is fitting that he +and his companions pay the penalty merited by their crime. +For these are pernicious to the State and to that peace and +security which litigants in the Courts of Rome ought to enjoy, +if we would maintain what the vigilance of the Supreme Pontiff +Alexander VII., and his successors, has provided. For they +have published a Constitution as to that, and with it Banns, +successively promulgated. The sacred order of such laws should +be observed all the more willingly, inasmuch as Guido had chosen +the judicial way to vengeance, and the appeals made to the +Supreme Pontiff, who is most eager to do what is just, were sent +back to his judges. Nor could Guido grieve for this without +some pretended injury, as is evident; hence the Anonymous +Writer wished to ascribe it to the aggravation by which the +anger of Franceschini had been exasperated. This clearly shows +with what intent he had broken into such detestable excesses. +</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft16" id="ft16">File-title of Pamphlet 16.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> + +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor of the<br /> +City in Criminal Cases</i>:</p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN MURDER-CASE.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For Count Guido Franceschini and his Associates,<br /> +Prisoners, against the Fisc.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Reply as to law, by the Honourable Advocate<br /> +of the Poor.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber,<br /> +1698.</i></p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center p6 b1">ROMANA HOMICIDIORUM<a name="pamphlet16" id="pamphlet16"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">229</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet 16.</span>]</p> + +<p class="p2"> +Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord:</p> + +<p>I omit further discussion with my Lord Advocate of the Fisc +about the communication of his allegations, because the time is +brief, and I have professed great reverence for him since my +youth. Let me also pass over the claim that when one is arguing +about death inflicted by a husband upon his wife, not in the act +of taking her in adultery, but after an interval, mere suspicion, +however strong, is not sufficient to redeem him from the ordinary +penalty of the Cornelian law, but that the clearest proof of the +adultery is required, as is claimed by our opponents. Yet we +have proved the contrary in our former argument, § <i>quamquam +ad hoc</i>. And Dondeus, Sanfelicius, and Muta, who were not +cited there, hold that it is quite enough if the couple be found +alone in some retreat; and No. 3 says especially if the wife be +beautiful. [Citation.] See the word of Ovid: "Great is the +strife of modesty with beauty, And man keeps eagerly craving +it." [<i>Heroides</i>, Paris to Helen.] So in the present case, according +to the same author: "By this young and passionate man is +she supposed to have been returned still a virgin?" [<i>Heroides</i>, +5, 109.]</p> + +<p>At present, we are dealing with a case not merely of clearest +proof, but also of notorious fact; because we have a decree +of this very Tribunal by which such adultery was declared. +Although the words of this decree have been given in the present +information, § <i>Absque eo quod</i>, yet I wish to repeat them here, +because they are so clear: "Giuseppe Maria Caponsacchi, of +Arezzo, for complicity in the flight of Francesca Comparini, and +for criminal knowledge of the same, is banished for three years +to Civita Vecchia."</p> + +<p>But I cannot pass over what is still claimed—that this decree +was revoked—because, as I have said in my information, the +truth is quite the contrary; for we have only the fact that in the +mandate for imprisoning the sinning Canon the repetition of the +whole decree, as given above, was omitted, and it was said: +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">230</a></span> +"For the cause, concerning which in the suit." These words are +so far from showing a revocation that they rather offer confirmation +of the said decree, as we have affirmed in our information, +§ <i>Nec verum est</i>. The same should be said of the like words +furnished by the notary in the bond which Francesca Pompilia +executed to keep the home of her father as a prison. This was +when she was brought there from the nunnery, where she had +been staying securely, on the grounds of her supposed infirmity, +but I may say more truly that it was because of her pregnancy, +which she wished to hide by some evil deed.</p> + +<p>[Our claim is all the more true] because this pretended +revocation of the decree could not be made when the other side +had not been heard, as I have said in my information, § <i>Eoque +magis</i>.</p> + +<p>Likewise I cannot pass over what is said as to the Canon +having been condemned only to the penalty of banishment +because of defect of proof of adultery. For if such proof had +not existed, how could my Lords Judges express in the decree +that they condemned him for criminal knowledge of the same +Francesca Pompilia? It is the truth that the judges held that +the said adultery was most conclusively proved, and that the +said Canon was convicted of the same, since in the prosecution +nothing is wanting but the taking of them in the foul act; and +this is not necessary to prove adultery. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>The penalty to which the said Canon was condemned did not +indeed correspond with the said crime. As to this many replies +may be made, but, because this has no connection with Count +Guido let it also pass by. For however that may be, who can +deny that Count Guido, on reading the said decree, which needed +no comment, ought justly to be angered for the conjugal faith +violated toward himself? And who can deny that he ought to +be somewhat excused, if afterwards he took vengeance for such +a violation? [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And this is true, although he took such vengeance after an +interval, as was plainly demonstrated in my said past information, +§ <i>Nec verum est</i>. For there are few authorities who hold +the contrary, and therefore it would be almost heretical to +doubt the truth of such an opinion. [Citation.] Especially +since this has been accepted in almost all the tribunals in the +world, particularly in that of the Sacred Council, which establishes +the precedent for all the other tribunals of the City and of +the entire Ecclesiastical State. Hence Concioli affirms that it is +almost like sacrilege to depart from this opinion. [Citation.] +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">231</a></span></p> + +<p>And is it not a fine pretence to wish to exclude the plainest +proofs of adultery by the word of the very wife convicted of it, +and then retained in the nunnery by reason of it, as my honourable +Lord Procurator General of the Fisc has ingenuously acknowledged? +For a person is not obliged to disclose his own baseness +in the face of death, as we have proved in the said present +information, § <i>Et quatenus</i>, and the § following. And since she +had lived badly, not to say in utter baseness, to the injury of +the honour and reputation of her husband, we inflict no injury +on her by wishing to presume that even in death she did not come +to her right mind, according to the saying: "He who lives +badly dies badly." And no one, even in death, is presumed to +be a Saint John the Baptist, as in my information, § <i>Nec valet dici</i>.</p> + +<p>As therefore it remains firmly established that Count Guido +had just cause for killing, or causing to be killed, Francesca +Pompilia, his wife, the same must be said as to the murder of +Pietro and Violante, the father-in-law and mother-in-law. For +in the prosecution of the said Francesca Pompilia for flight from +her husband, proof also came to light that they had conspired +in that same crime, and consequently were among the causes of +the injured honour and reputation of Count Guido. And this +injury to his honour had also resulted from what they had pretended +and had exposed before every one—that his wife was not +their daughter, nor legitimately born, but was the daughter of a +harlot. And afterward they had received her into their home +when she had been declared an adulteress. For either she was +their daughter, and they ought not to deny it in Court, or else +she was not their daughter, and they should not receive her into +their home after she had been convicted of adultery. For in +doing so they had, by that very act, declared that they had been +and wished to be her panderers. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>The confession of Count Guido cannot be divided from its +qualification, that he had demanded the murders for honour's +sake. But it ought to be accepted by the Fisc along with the +said qualification, as we have proved in our information, § <i>Huiusmodi +enim confessio</i>. The authorities alleged to the contrary +by my Lord Advocate of the Fisc hold good in a qualification, +extraneous to the confession itself and which is not therefore +proved otherwise, and when there is argument for some extraordinary +penalty, and we have admitted this in our information, +§ <i>Præsertim</i>.</p> + +<p>But just as the plea of injured honour relieves Count Guido +from the ordinary penalty for murder, so should he be excused +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">232</a></span> +from certain other ordinary penalties, laid in the Banns and +Apostolic Constitutions against those bearing prohibited arms +or committing other crimes. For I have said, and I repeat, +that the just anger which excuses him from the one crime should +also excuse him from the others, since this reason is everywhere +and always in his favour, that he was not of sound mind, according +to what was affirmed in our information from § <i>Agnoscit +Fiscus</i>, down to § <i>quo vero ad litem</i>.</p> + +<p>And just as this cause is enough to gain for Count Guido a +diminution of the penalty, so should it be considered to be +sufficient likewise to gain that favour for his fellows, who as +auxiliaries cannot be punished with a greater penalty than the +principal himself, according to almost innumerable authorities, +and they of great name, who were alleged in my past argument, +§ <i>quæ dicta sunt</i>, with the following, and in my present argument, +§ <i>Verum et Sociis</i>. To this, no response has been given by the +other side.</p> + +<p>This is all the easier as regards Blasio Agostinelli, who has +not at all confessed that he killed or wounded any one, but only +that he was present, as we have formerly considered the matter +in our information, § <i>Quoad Blasium</i>.</p> + +<p>And as to Domenico and Francesco, beside what has been +deduced in favour of the others, they are foreigners, and are +therefore not bound by the Banns of the Governor (for by these, +men who live outside of the District are not bound) nor by the +Apostolic Constitutions prohibiting the bearing of arms, as we +have said in our past argument, § <i>Quae eo facilius</i>.</p> + +<p>This is all the more so since Domenico still asserts that he +is a minor, and for this purpose he was so described in the +prosecution (page 304). And as regards Francesco, beside the +abovesaid description in the same prosecution (page 35), we +have the baptismal register, which conclusively proves his age. +[Citations.] For he was born the 14th day of February, 1674, +from which it is evident that at the time of the commission of +the crime, which is to be had in regard for punishment +[Citations], he had not completed the twenty-fourth year of his +age. And to one less than twenty-five years old the penalty +should be diminished, etc. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And this indeed is of necessity, and not at the discretion of +the judge, because such diminution of penalty arises by advantage +of law that has been passed and from intrinsic reason, +diminishing the penalty. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Although there are not lacking some authorities who think +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">233</a></span> +the contrary, namely that it all depends upon the discretion of +the judge, yet our opinion is the truer and the more generally +accepted in criminal causes which are not very atrocious. +[Citations.] And when the crime is merely savage, or more +savage, the judge is obliged by the very necessity of his duty +to diminish the penalty, according to those authorities recently +alleged. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>This opinion also has a place in the crime of murder, notwithstanding +the order of the text. [Citations.] "If any one should +make you a defendant under the Cornelian Law, it is suitable +that your innocence shall defend and purge itself by your +minority." For the order of this text should be interpreted +thus, namely, that a delinquent who is a minor is not to be +excused entirely, but is only to be punished more mildly, according +to the old authorities who are cited with abundant hand by +Farinacci. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>This is especially so when, as in the present case, the delinquent +minor does not sin alone, but in company with others; +for then he is presumed to be seduced by them, and therefore +the ordinary penalty comes to be diminished the more readily +for him. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>We do not know whither the Fisc pretends to turn for the +destruction of these foundations in law, because my Honourable +Lords, the counsellors of the Fisc, have claimed nothing as to +this matter, either in their past argument or the present one. +For when they claim to escape our exception by the Florentine +Statute [Citation], that a minor of sixteen years is punished +criminally, other responses are at hand:</p> + +<p>First, that the provision of this statute does not extend to +crimes committed outside of the territory of the said State, but +that the place of the crime and its statutes should be attended. +Then these indeed cease, as they do in the present case, because +the Banns of the Governor have no place when there is argument +for the punishment of a foreigner. This fact arises from +defect of power in the Prince or official establishing them, +according to what was alleged in the past argument, § <i>Quae eo +facilius</i>, and the one following. For then the criminal should +be punished according to common law. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>The second response is that the statute says nothing else than +that a minor of sixteen years cannot be punished with the +ordinary penalty of the crime. Consequently it ought to hold +good in our case, since we are indeed arguing about a minor +exceeding sixteen years, but of one less than twenty-five years +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">234</a></span> +old. Such a rule should be drawn from Common Law, in view +of which the said statute in such a case receives a passive +interpretation. [Citations.] Caballus testifies that he saw it +so practised in diminishing the penalty to one less than twenty-five +years, that is to one who was eighteen years old. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Finally the third response, and the one that lays the axe to the +root of the tree, is that the Accused is not of the city of Florence, +nor of its territory, but of the territory of Arezzo. But the city +of Arezzo and its dependencies are not bound by the statutes +of Florence; first because they are not called subjects, but +vassals, of the said city of Florence; and, second, because the +city of Arezzo has its own statutes. [Citations.] For reference +is had to the ruling state, when other subject states have not +their own statutes; but it is otherwise, if they have them. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>And so they are contrary, or incompatible. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Soccinius [Citation] bears witness of what manner these +statutes of Arezzo are, as compared with those of the city of +Florence, etc., and this is plain from the Rubric, etc., where +it is commanded that those under twenty-five years cannot be +rendered liable, without certain ceremonies, as Paolo di Castro +counsels. [Citation.] For from this statute it is sufficiently +evident that in the said city and its environs a less age is the +rule according to common law.</p> + +<p>So far as the Fisc may have foundations, which in our feeble +judgment we have been unable to guess, I pray that these be +kindly communicated to me, lest the poor accused minor may +remain undefended.</p> + +<p>Finally, as regards Count Guido, I pray that notice be taken +of the unfortunate condition of himself and of his noble family. +For all of his family and connection have had enough to lament +even to the last breath of their lives, when they look upon the +ignominy brought upon them by this woman and her parents. +And because of this, there has been doubt up to the very present +moment whether one nearly related would go mad. And the +excellent piety of our most clement Prince and Most Illustrious +Lord has declared this, to whom the Accused himself with his +whole heart commends himself in the Arguments made in his +defence, not to speak of what they may learn about it from the +Anonymous Author [<a href="#pamphlet10">Pamphlet 10</a>]. [Citation.]</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Desiderio Spreti</span>, <i>Advocate of the Poor</i>.</p> + +<p class="p6 b1 center">LETTER</p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">235</a></span></p> + +<p class="center"><span class="smcap">Written by the Honourable Signor GIACINTO +ARCANGELI, procurator of the poor, to Monsignore +FRANCESCO CENCINI, in florence, in which he +tells him that the sentence of death had been +executed in rome against the guilty on february 22, +1698—that is, that FRANCESCHINI had been beheaded, +and the other four hanged.</span></p> + +<p class="p2 center">[<span class="smcap">Letter I.</span>]</p> +<p> +To the illustrious Signor, my most worshipful Signor and +Patron:</p> + +<p>Too late have arrived those proofs, which were sent to me +by your Honour, on behalf of Signor Guido Franceschini of +blessed memory. For when the Congregation of Monsignor the +Governor had determined, in spite of the reasons given in his +favour, that Signor Guido was guilty under the death penalty, +I obtained, with much trouble to myself, some delay for proving +his clergyship alleged by me. To this end a messenger was +dispatched to Arezzo. But since the Sanctity of Our Lord +[the Pope] did not deem it wise to postpone the execution of the +sentence already decreed, he has seen best by special writ to +make denial of any clerical privilege, which might have been +claimed [in Guido's favour], and also as regards the minority of +Francesco di Pasquini, one of the accomplices. Hence sentence +against all five has been executed to-day, with distinction only +in the manner of their death, as Guido's life was ended by +decapitation. This consolation survives for his relatives and +friends, that he has been pitied by all men of honour and by +all good men. Confessing my own shortcomings, I cannot +deny feeling infinite regret, as I attribute the whole outcome to +my inability in offering the valid grounds. May God reward +his house and all his friends with abundant blessedness for this +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">236</a></span> +tragic accident. Desiring your further commands, I reaffirm +myself, as ever,</p> + +<p class="left45">Your Excellency's most obedient servant,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="smcap">Giacinto Arcangeli.</span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Rome</span>, <i>February 22, 1698</i>.</p> + +<p>To the illustrious Signor, my most worshipful Signor and +Patron, Signor Advocate Francesco Cencini, Florence.</p> + +<p class="p6 b1 center">LETTERS</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">237</a></span></p> + +<p class="center"><span class="smcap">Written by Signor GASPERO DEL TORTO and Signor +CARLO ANTONIO UGOLINUCCI to the aforesaid +Monsignore FRANCESCO CENCINI.</span></p> + +<p class="center p2">[Letter II.]</p> + +<p>The proofs you send did not arrive in time, because to-day +finally, after so many disputes, the execution of poor Signor +Guido has taken place, he having been beheaded, while the four +cut-throats have been hanged. The case was decided Tuesday, +but because it was a churchman who had sinned, and because +it was claimed that the death-sentence was not in keeping therewith, +a messenger was dispatched to Arezzo later on to get +proofs of it. But the Pope yesterday set his hand thereto, and +has decided the case, so that to-day it has so followed completely. +Now that the will of God has been fulfilled that he should suffer +such a punishment, it has at least been brought about, in view +of the arguments made in his defence, that he died the death of +a gallant man. For aside from the fact that he has died with +exemplary courage, he has also been pitied by all gallant men, +and his house has lost nothing in the matter of reputation. All +Rome was there, as you may well believe. And [the mistake] +cannot be made good with such speed as this may be written, +because there have not been lacking admonitions of greatest +consequence, since the Ambassador of the Emperor spoke of +that point on Tuesday, as he himself told me day before yesterday; +and than the matter was settled precipitately.</p> + +<p>I have finished the argument before the Congregation of the +Council, and at any time that Monsignor Secretary wishes to +take it, I think we shall be ready. I pray you favour me with +those copies of the proof as soon as possible. And if Canon +Philippo does not give us the opportunity, he should be good +enough to acknowledge it to me that I may think of other +measures, wishing once for all to get out of this imbroglio if it +shall be possible. And finally, I remain with all reverence, my +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">238</a></span> +most illustrious and most excellent Signor, Your humble and +obedient Servant,</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Gaspero del Torto.</span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Rome</span>, <i>February 22, 1698</i>.</p> + +<p>To the most illustrious and most excellent Signor, my dear +Signor, Signor Francesco Cencini, Florence.</p> + +<p class="p2 center">[Letter III.]</p> + +<p> +My most illustrious and excellent Signor, my most worshipful +Patron:</p> + +<p>Tuesday this most unfortunate case was brought up and the +Congregation of the Governor decided—Delay and according to +instructions. The instructions were that they would await the +proofs of the well-known clericate. At this favourable decision +the defence took heart and Guido's good friends began to +breathe again. Then last evening at eight o'clock Monsignor +signed of his own accord the warrant, in denial of the clergyship +which might be alleged and of the minority of one of the +accomplices. No sooner had he signed the warrant than the +news of it sped throughout the City, and with it the assurance +of the sentence, which has been executed to-day since dinner +against the five; that is, the loss of his head in the case of Signor +Guido, and the gallows for the other four accomplices. I will +not tell your Excellency my own grief, because you yourself will +be able to be a true witness of it. These proofs would have been +of the greatest relevancy, but not in this case, because Monsignor +wished it so.</p> + +<p>I enclose the Fisc's argument, except a single response, which +I will send to you as soon as I can lay hands on it, that your +Excellency may have the entire case.</p> + +<p>Now that Signor Advocate del Corto has abandoned his own +interests I may serve your Excellency in the matrimonial case +and in the other of Gomez. Therefore I set myself to all that +in order that I may serve your Excellency, praying evermore +your continual commands, that I may ever be your Excellency's +obedient servant,</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Carlo Antonio Ugolinucci</span>.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Rome</span>, <i>February 22, 1698</i>.</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p class="n0"> +[<a name="ft17" id="ft17">File-title of Pamphlet 17.</a>]</p> +<hr class="l50" /> + +<p class="p2"><i>By the Most Illustrious and Most<br /> +Reverend Lord Governor in<br /> +Criminal Cases, or by<br /> +the Most Excellent Lord Venturini.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>ROMAN LAWSUIT.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>For the Heir-beneficiary of the former Francesca<br /> +Pompilia, formerly wife of the former Guido<br /> +Franceschini, against the Fisc and<br /> +Associates in the Lawsuit.</i></p> + +<p class="p2"><i>Memorial of Fact by the Honourable Procurator<br /> +of the Poor.</i></p> +<hr class="l15" /> + +<p class="n0"><i>At Rome, in the type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber</i>,<br /> +1698.</p> +<hr class="l50" /> +</div> + +<p class="center b1 p6">ROMANA<a name="pamphlet17" id="pamphlet17"></a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">241</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet</span> 17.]</p> + +<p class="p2"> +Most Illustrious and most Reverend Lord:</p> + +<p>In the contention most sharply and most learnedly carried on +between the Defenders of the Poor and the Fisc in the case of the +murders committed by persons led by Count Guido Franceschini +against the person of Francesca Pompilia his wife, and Pietro +and Violante Comparini, I refuse to descend into the arena, lest +I may seem to fail in the office which I discharge in common with +the said Defenders. My silent pity has delayed and let time +slip by; because I believed it would be to the prejudice of Guido +and his fellows imprisoned for that offence (in whose excuse the +plea of injured honour is especially strong) if I should wish to +push the defence (which was committed to me long ago) of the +shame and honour of the same Francesca Pompilia; for her +tender mind has been stained by no infamy arising from impure +lust, and against her the suspicious husband could have made no +objection, unless wife-murder had followed, as if from this he +wished to prove the adultery merely because he could then kill +his wife, and he killed her that she might be believed to be an +adulteress.</p> + +<p>But now since the case has been most sadly terminated as +regards all of those imprisoned (for thus these things terminated +which should not have been begun) I begin anew the dispute +over that most unfortunate question, and assert most safely +(both for the reasons fully given in my argument for exclusion +of the asserted rape, which is reassumed gratuitously, and for +those more fully gathered by his Honour, My Lord Advocate +of the Fisc, in his very learned allegations distributed in both +presentations of the case), first that the memory of the aforesaid +Francesca Pompilia should be utterly absolved from the crime +of adultery, which was unjustly and all too bitterly charged +upon her by her husband, and second that declaration should be +made by a definitive sentence that she has never violated her +marriage vow. And this is in spite of the fact that such insistence +may seem incongruous. For although all crimes cease +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">242</a></span> +with the death of the criminal [Citations], nevertheless when a +crime is atrocious, and of such a nature that it involves in itself +a brand of infamy, its memory ever endures. And therefore +it is worth while for the principal to vindicate the fame of the +authoress from the asserted crime of adultery, etc. Pellegrini +speaks as follows: "The thirteenth case is when the heirs of +one dead, for the purpose of purging him from the infamy which +works against him publicly on account of crime, wish that [the +court] take knowledge of the crime itself, for the purpose of +establishing his innocence, for this is conceded by law." And +Bossius asserts: "Note that even if death does utterly remove +any further penalty, yet the heirs of one who is dead may make +a stand for his fame and honour, in order that a declaration may +be made about that crime." And Caballus: "For although +with the death of the delinquent, a crime may be said to be +extinct so far as his own person is concerned, yet the heirs of the +accused, in their own interest and to wipe out the infamy of the +one who is dead, may petition that the court go on to give an +opinion, and that it be declared that the dead one had not committed +crime." And he affirms the same under the following +number.</p> + +<p>And indeed this is not without manifest reason. For just as +the Fisc may go further in the investigation of a crime that had +been perpetrated during the lifetime of the one now dead, even +for the purpose of damning his memory [Citations], likewise it +cannot be denied by the principal himself, as the beneficiary +heir and successor of the same Pompilia and Pietro Comparini, +that inasmuch as her innocence is evident he may insist upon +carrying away a sentence of absolution; for in other cases +any one at all may have a chance to defend one who is dead. +[Citations.]</p> + +<p>And to delay such a judgment it is not right that the flight +again be alleged, which the said Pompilia made in the company +of Canon Caponsacchi, with whom she was arrested at the inn +of Castelnuovo. For to remove that charge it is quite enough +for one to allege the judgment of this Most Illustrious Congregation, +given under the date of February 18, last past, against +Guido Franceschini, because of which he was publicly put to +death on the twenty-second day following, notwithstanding +the fact that, to avoid the penalty of wife-murder, he insisted +solely upon the asserted adultery, which he claimed had resulted +from the aforesaid flight from home. All suspicion whatsoever +of her dishonesty ceases because of the defences then made and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">243</a></span> +because, in the very prosecution, there was apparent a very just +reason, on account of which the wretched wife attempted to flee +thus from the home of her husband. Nor was it for the purpose +of satisfying lust with the asserted lover, but that she might go +back to her own hearth, and there, with her parents, might live a +safe and honest life. This cause is very plainly proved by the +notorious quarrels which arose on account of the poverty of the +domestic establishment immediately after her arrival at the +City of Arezzo along with Pietro and Violante Comparini in +execution of the agreement included in the marriage-contract. +And on account of this poverty the Comparini were obliged, +after a few months, to go back to the City, with no small bitterness +on account of the deception which they had detected. +This is evident from the letters of Abate Paolo Franceschini, +which presuppose these complaints that resulted from the said +deception, and especially from the letter written March 6, 1694: +"I write again to you that I do not wish to imitate him in his +manner of writing, not being of his mind to sow broadcast in +my letters such words as would well merit response by deeds, +and not by words. And these are so offensive that I have +kept them for his reproof and mortification." And further +on: "So that if you give trouble, which I will never believe, +you yourself will not be exempt therefrom." It is also evident +from the letters given in my past information, and especially in +§ <i>Videns igitur</i>, with the one following. And although this does +not show the nature of the altercation, yet, since Abate Paolo +has not shown the letters written to himself, the presumption +presses upon him very strongly that the complaints were just +and that the cause of their quarrels and altercations was well +founded. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>It is also true that a very bitter lawsuit was brought by Pietro +Comparini for the nullification of the dowry contract and for the +proof of the pretence of birth, which had been made by Violante, +the mother, both to deceive her husband and to bar his creditors, +who were pressing him hard at the time. And since the dowry +included all the property and the entire patrimony of Comparini, +which was of no small value when we consider the rank of the +persons concerned, controversy had indeed been raised for a +considerable amount by the father-in-law. And this, as experience +teaches from time to time, is accustomed to bring forth +implacable hatred and deadly enmity. [Citations.] It produced +indeed such an effect for this unfortunate wife, so that +the love of her husband, which had long been disturbed by the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">244</a></span> +preceding altercations, was finally quite extinct. And this was +so to such an extent that she often found herself exposed to deadly +peril because of the severity of her husband, who at times +pursued her with abuse, and again even with a pistol. And it +cannot be questioned that such perils are quite suited to strike +fear even into any hardy man. [Citations.] Hence it can be +much more affirmed of Francesca Pompilia, a girl of tender age, +who was destitute of all aid, and away from her own home +and her parents. [Citations.] And Mogolon [Citation] declares +that the mere sight of arms, even if the one who has them does +not use them nor unsheath them, is just cause for fear; and in +§ 7, <i>No.</i> 15, he considers the absence of relatives as a ground for +fear. And D. Rainaldi [Citation] says that it is enough if one +sees signs or acts of manifest desire, or such as are preparatory.</p> + +<p>Therefore, since so many very relevant circumstances concur, +on account of which Pompilia was moved to desert her husband's +bed by flight, all suspicion whatsoever of dishonesty and of +violated conjugal faith is utterly removed. For whenever we +have two causes, one of which is lawful and permissible, while +the other is iniquitous and abominable, the former is to be fully +received, and thereby the charge of crime is quite excluded. +[Citations.] [And this is true] in spite of the fact that this +lawful cause may seem to be excluded [first] by the letter +written by Francesca Pompilia to Abate Paolo. For in the +letter, after she had thanked Abate Paolo because he had joined +her in marriage with his brother, pretence is made that her parents +gave her the depraved counsel to destroy the entire home and +to go back to the City with her lover; [it also makes pretence] +that since their departure she was enjoying a quiet and tranquil +life. [Second] from the company of the Canon Giuseppe Caponsacchi, +with whom she had fled; because of which he was +banished to Civita Vecchia for three years.</p> + +<p>For however it may be with the asserted letter, whether it is +substantiated or not, and whether or not the qualification should +be considered probable, which is added in her sworn testimony +by the same Pompilia, namely that her husband had marked the +characters and she had blackened them with ink by tracing +them with a pen, because she herself did not know how to write; +yet it is certain that if the letter be read attentively it will be +absolutely impossible to assert that she had written it with a +calm mind. For who can be found so unmindful of filial love +and duty toward parents as to persuade himself that this tender +girl could have laid upon her parents such detestable crimes? +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">245</a></span> +Because at the time she was not more than fourteen years old, +according to the certificate of baptism given in the Summary of +the Fisc, in the second setting forth of the cause, No. 2. And +she was away from her own home and still grieving for the very +recent departure of her parents, and was badly treated in the +home of her husband, as is clearly shown by the continual complaints +and recourse made not merely to the most reverend +Bishop, but also to the Lord-Commissioner of the city. Nor is +it probable that she would have informed her brother-in-law, +who was so very unsympathetic toward her, of these matters +unless, as she has frankly confessed in her sworn examination, +she was compelled thereto by her husband. Nor without very +evident peril of death could she show any reluctance to him +because of his excessive severity, which she had very often felt +before. And as this improbability is well suited to strike horror +into those who read it, so likewise it very well shows that the +letter was not written voluntarily, but under compulsion. +[Citations.] Caballus asserts that what no sane mind would +approve is inadmissible. [Citation.] And indeed such excessive +cunning in extorting the said letter from the wife plainly +proves Guido's craft, and the fact that the letter was obtained +by false pretence, in order that he might quiet the mind of the +same Abate, his brother. For the latter had been harassed by +continual complaints on account of ill treatment of the wife, +and had not ceased to criticise Guido daily for them. [Citation.]</p> + +<p>As to her association with Canon Caponsacchi, this likewise +does not seem enough to establish the blot of dishonour. For +the most wretched wife was utterly destitute of all earthly aid +and had vainly entreated the authority of the most reverend +Bishop, and of the Lord-Commissioner, to free her from deadly +peril; and on account of her age and sex it was not suitable that +she should flee alone or in the company of some low-born serving-woman, +for in that way she would carelessly expose herself to +graver peril, as might have happened to her if she had been +overtaken while alone on the journey. For then it could be +said of her: "She fell upon Scylla while trying to avoid +Charybdis." Therefore we should not be surprised if she took +the aforesaid Canon as a companion. For he had been proposed +to her by both Canon Conti and Gregorio Guillichini, who were +related to Pompilia's husband. And it is utterly incredible that +they would have consented to such a flight if they had not known +it was quite necessary to evade the peril of death, which they +very well knew was threatening the luckless wife, and if they +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">246</a></span> +had not had strong faith in the honesty and integrity of her +companion. Therefore, as such a necessity was pressing so hard +upon her, her prudent choice of the lesser evil eliminates any +shadow whatsoever of her pretended dishonesty. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>[This is especially true when we] consider the manner in which +the flight was executed, by taking the most direct road to the +City with the utmost possible speed. And it very well shows +that the sole motive was to save her life, and not to debase herself +by licentious delights. For if this latter had indeed been +the principal cause, she would not have gone to Rome by the +shortest road, where she might immediately be taken by her +brother-in-law and her parents, but would have gone to some +more distant regions, or else she would not have gone with such +swiftness, but would have delayed out of the public highway, +and in a place where her husband could not find her, and where +she could fulfil to satiety her lust.</p> + +<p>This utter improbability therefore very well shows the truth +of the cause for flight adduced by the wife in her sworn testimony—namely +that she had gone swiftly to the City in order that +she might there place her life and honour in safety in the home +of her parents. For just as the strongest sentence of blame +may arise from mere probability, so likewise no less presumption +of innocence should arise from this improbability. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>And this is strongly urged by the frank protestation made in +the very act of arrest at the inn of Castelnuovo to the husband +himself by the Canon, who rebuked him concerning this flight: +"I am a gallant man, and what I have done, I have done to free +your wife from the peril of death." So testifies Jacopo, son of +the former Simon, a witness for the Fisc, in the prosecution for +flight (page 50). And an example was offered by me in my +allegation as regards that flight, namely that of Scipio Africanus. +For when the beautiful young wife of Aleucius, the chief of the +Celtiberi, had been captured by Scipio's soldiers, he said in +restoring her to her husband: "Your wife has been with me as +she would be with her own parents. Her virtue has been preserved +for you so that she can be given back to you again, a gift +unviolated and worthy of me and you." Titus Livius bears +witness to this in his <i>Histories</i>, book 26, and page 493 in my +volume.</p> + +<p>And although it may be very difficult for a beautiful woman +to preserve the decorum of her honour while journeying in the +company of a young lover, yet it is not utterly impossible, as the +examples seem to show, which were related in my allegation, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">247</a></span> +§ <i>Quidqud dicat</i>. And to these I add that of Penelope, of whom +Ovid sings in book 3 of his elegies [<i>Amores</i>, III., 4, 23]: +"Although she lacked a guard, Penelope continued chaste +among so many suitors."</p> + +<p>And this is especially true since neither the journey nor the +company of the Canon were voluntary, but were merely for the +purpose of avoiding the peril of death. And since such necessity +was present, the presumption drawn from Ovid's <i>Ars Amandi</i> is +rendered still further inapplicable, namely that "From a +passionate young man, can she be believed to have returned a +virgin?" [<i>Heroides</i>, 5, 129.]</p> + +<p>Nor do the letters which were found in the closet of the inn at +Castelnuovo seem to stand in the way and hinder the sentence +petitioned, and impose a blot of infamy upon Francesca Pompilia. +It is claimed that these were written by her to the Canon on +account of the very devoted love with which she was pursuing +him. But the exceptions and responses made in the past informations +hold good. The first is that they were not acknowledged +by her, nor was the identity of the handwriting proved; +and some uncertainty is still present, since it is not evident to +whom they were directed; nor would it be improbable that +they might have been framed by the husband. For he was +present at the capture and search, and hoped, indeed, that therefrom +might result more readily the fixing of the crime of adultery. +And he insisted very strongly upon this, in order that he might +gain the desired dowry and lucre. This mere possibility to the +contrary is enough to avoid the proof, which it is claimed may +be drawn from them. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>The second response is that, even though such exceptions as +the above might not hold good, yet no proof of violated conjugal +faith and of dishonour can be drawn from these letters. For +even though proof of adultery may result from love-letters, it is +utterly excluded in our case when we see that they were directed +to a licit end, namely toward soliciting the Canon that he might +afford her aid in her flight and that she might avoid deadly peril. +For then, just as the end is permissible, so should the means also +be considered lawful and permissible, even though suspicion is +not lacking; for these should be considered, not in themselves, +but on account of their end. [Citations.] But indeed, unless +from the love-letters themselves there result an implicit confession +of fornication, proof of adultery cannot be drawn from +them. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>It should be specially noted that she had very strong confidence +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">248</a></span> +in her own continence and in the integrity of the Canon. +And she trusted him much, and hoped that he would conduct +himself modestly during the journey, since it is evident from +these same letters that she had found fault with him for his +freedom once: "And I marvel, that you who have been so +chaste, have composed and copied matters that are so dishonourable." +And further on: "But I would not have you do in any +case as you have done in these books. The first of them is +honourable, but the other octaves are quite the contrary. I +cannot believe that you, who have been of such honour, have +become so bold." For such sincere objurgation and the very +tenor of the letters in which no dishonesty is read, clearly show +and declare the spirit of Pompilia, who wrote them. For just +as words are to be understood according to the thought of the +one proffering them, so likewise should letters be interpreted +according to the intention of the one writing them. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Since therefore the honour and modesty of Pompilia is vindicated +from the flight and the letters, of still lighter weight are +the other proofs of pretended dishonour. These are deduced +from the approach of the Canon to her home for the purpose of +speaking to her; from the insidious manner in which the flight +was prepared and put into execution, by means of an opiate +administered to her husband and the servants; from their +mutual kisses on the journey; and from their sleeping together +at the inn of Castelnuovo. For beside the general response that +no conclusive proof is offered for all these, such as would be +necessary to establish Pompilia as guilty of adultery, there is a +separate response for each of them.</p> + +<p>The entry and egress at night time into the home of Francesca +rests merely upon the deposition of a single witness, Maria +Margherita Contenti, who is under two very relevant exceptions: +namely those of singleness and of harlotry. Her word therefore +can impose no blot of infamy. [Citations.] And since such +approach would tend toward the single end of arranging for the +flight and rescue of the unfortunate wife from the very imminent +peril of death, it should not be presumed to be for an evil end. +For when an express cause is plainly present, to which a matter +may be referred, and this cause is entirely lawful, the matter +should not be attributed to a cause that is illicit and criminal. +[Citation.]</p> + +<p>The insidious manner, also, whereby Francesca Pompilia put +into execution the flight, by preparing an opiate for her husband +and all the household (aside from the fact that it is not proved), +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">249</a></span> +would afford proof of sagacity rather than of dishonour, even if +it were proved. For the wife would have been very foolish if +she had attempted flight without such a precaution.</p> + +<p>Under the same lack of proof labours the asserted mutual +kissing during the journey; for that proof is entirely too slight, +which is pretended to result from the deposition of a single +witness of the lowest class. Especially since his word is shown +to be too much prejudiced; for he swears that, while he was +driving the carriage swiftly at night time, he saw Francesca +Pompilia and the Canon kissing each other. Nor does he give +any reason, as that the moon was shining, or that some artificial +light was present to dispel the darkness. Inasmuch as such a +detail is necessary in a witness who is testifying about a deed at +night time, its omission takes away all confidence in him. [Citations.] +For there is to be added another very strong improbability, +namely that, while he was driving the carriage with such +velocity that it seemed to fly rather than to run, he could see +their mutual kissing by looking backward. Still more is this +improbability increased by the very word of this same witness, +since he swears that he had driven Pompilia without knowing +that it was she, until afterward returning to Arezzo, he had met +Guido Franceschini, her husband, following her. Because if +he had seen her kiss, he would have recognised her straightway, +since he had often seen her before and she was well known to +him. And therefore it should be absolutely declared that, either +influenced by the tedium of his secret prison, he had been compelled +to swear so, or, as is more probable, since on account of +the very great speed of the carriage the bumping together of +those seated therein might chance, he had believed that this +chance jostling of their heads and faces was for the base purpose +of kissing. Hence the proof arising from his deposition was +justly held in contempt in the prosecution for flight. And it +would have been considered if it had had any probability.</p> + +<p>Finally the proof of dishonour drawn from the asserted sleeping +together in the same tavern at Castelnuovo is far weaker, +since it was constantly denied by both Pompilia and Caponsacchi +in their testimony. And only a single witness, the house-man +of the same tavern, swears to it; and this also not from +certain knowledge, but presumptively, because they had asked +him for a room with a single bed. Canon Caponsacchi frankly +confesses why he had ordered that only a single bed should be +prepared—namely that Francesca Pompilia, who was worn out +because of ill-health and the discomfort of their precipitate +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">250</a></span> +journey, might rest a little, while he himself kept guard. Such +an act should not be assigned to an illicit cause, as Cravetta +[Citation] advises in such circumstances. And in No. 15, he +says that interpretation should always incline to the humaner +side, even when the rigorous side may seem the more likely. +And the same author continues thus in <i>Nos.</i> 20 <i>and</i> 21. For it +would not suffice as a full proof of adultery that any one be found +alone and naked with her alone and naked, and that a young +man be found unclothed and with shoes off in a closed chamber +with a woman. Much less can such proof arise from a very +brief delay in the same chamber for the purpose of keeping +watch.</p> + +<p>Very slightly does it stand in the way that Francesca Pompilia, +in her cross-examination, concealed this delay by asserting +that she had arrived at the tavern at dawn. For she was very +well aware of the credulousness of her husband, and possibly +asserted this to avert further suspicion of violated honour, which +certainly might have arisen if she had confessed that she had +spent a longer time in the tavern. As even if she had not +denied such a stay, the confession under circumstances that still +argue for the preservation of her modesty would not have been +to her prejudice, so likewise the lie can do no injury. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>But all suspicion of pretended dishonour is quite eliminated +by the assertion of the most unfortunate woman, which was +made in the very face of death, after many severe wounds had +been inflicted upon her by her husband. [For she declared +that] she had never sinned against her marriage vow, as is very +evident from the numerous depositions of religious men, who +ministered to her in death. They assert that they heard her +continually praying that she might be given no forgiveness by +the Divine Clemency for such a sin. This assertion made in the +very face of death, deserves all faith, since no one placed in that +condition is presumed to be so unmindful of eternal safety as to +be willing to lie. [Citations.]</p> + +<p>Finally, no foundation for accusing the memory of Francesca +Pompilia of dishonesty can be established upon the asserted +decree of this most Illustrious Congregation, by whom Canon +Caponsacchi was condemned to three years' banishment in +Civita Vecchia, with a statement made of his running away and +criminal knowledge of Francesca Pompilia. For, as the Fisc +himself admits, there was demanded by me, though not <i>in +extenso</i>, the modification of that title by the honourable Judges, +with the approval of his Excellency the Governor. And therefore, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">251</a></span> +in the order for imprisonment, these words were suppressed +and others were put in their place: <i>Pro causa de qua in actis</i>.</p> + +<p>All further difficulty is removed from the mere consideration +that such a decree had been issued, while no defences had been +made for Francesca Pompilia, and while she was still utterly +without a hearing. For she had not the slightest knowledge of +it, since she had not been notified. But in the decree for the +assignment of the home as a prison, only a cause relative to the +trial was expressed. Hence it could not injure her, since it was +issued against a third party while she herself had not been cited. +[Citations.] And in the circumstances that a sentence given +against an adulterer can do no injury to the adulteress when +she has not been cited is the text. [Citations.] "If he is condemned, +the wife is not condemned thereby, but shall carry on +her own case." [Citation.]</p> + +<p>This is especially true since we are not now contending to free +the husband from wife-murder, and to infer a just cause apart +from belief in the dishonour of the wife resulting from the said +decree, and which would excuse him from the penalty of the +Cornelian law. In this case, the changing of the said decree +might possibly serve for an escape. But we are contending +about the damning of the memory of a woman now dead, and +about rescuing her and her family from infamy. And in the +latter case just as such a harsh decree could not injure her during +her lifetime, so likewise it cannot do her injury after her death.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Antonio Lamparelli</span>, <i>Procurator of Charity</i>.</p> +<p>[in old writing.]</p> + +<p>And according to the letter of Carolo Antonio Ugolinucci, +May 17, 1698, I understand that the Criminal Court after two +votes, decided on absolution.</p> + +<p class="b1 p6 center"><a name="pamphlet18" id="pamphlet18">INSTRUMENT OF FINAL JUDGMENT</a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">252</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">[<span class="smcap">Pamphlet</span> 18.]</p> + +<p class="p2">Given for the restoration of the good name and reputation of +Francesca Pompilia, now dead; formerly the wife of Guido +Franceschini of Arezzo, now dead; for acquittal in favour of +Domenico Tighetti, as an heir beneficiary of the same Francesca +Pompilia, from all disquietude, all molestations, vexations, and +perturbations, brought or threatened to be brought by the +Venerable Monastery of Saint Mary Magdalene of the Convertites +in the Corso; together with the citations lawfully +executed in observation of the four terms to instruct themselves +as to the appeal and its legal prosecution, in order that the same +sentence might pass on, as it has passed on, to judgment, because +no appeal has been interposed.</p> + +<p class="i1">In the name of God, Amen.</p> + +<p class="p2">September 9, 1698, under the sixth declaration in the eighth +year of the Pontificate of the Most Sacred Father in Christ, etc., +Innocent XII., Pope by Divine Providence. This is a copy, or +transcript, of the citations made by my own act, and written +below, and of the sentence rendered respectively of the following +tenor, namely:</p> + +<p class="p2"> +The Most Reverend and Most Illustrious Governor in criminal +matters:</p> + +<p>Let the undernamed principals on the other side be cited, etc., +to appear in the Criminal Court to-morrow, which will be the +nineteenth day of the current month, at the accustomed hour +of convening court, lest it seem good that each and all the terms +be repeated as ill founded, and that they therefore are to be held +and observed as null and void in their force for any powers +whatsoever, and lest the one so insisting be freed from censures, +so far as, etc., it be concluded, or seem best to be concluded in +the case, and that the final sentence be heard in due form according +to the aforesaid insistence by Domenico Tighetti, heir-beneficiary +of the former Francesca Pompilia, the wife of the +former Guido Franceschini, as principal, or, etc.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Notary for the Poor.</span> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">253</a></span></p> + +<p class="i8"> +<span class="o4">The Most Illustrious Francesco de Gambi,</span> Procurator +General of the Fisc, and of the Reverend Apostolic +Chamber.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">The Honourable Giovanni Maria Serbucci,</span> Procurator and +Manager of the lawsuit brought by the former Guido +Franceschini.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">The Honourable Francesco Paracciani,</span> Procurator of the +Venerable Monastery Santa Maria Magdalena of the +Convertites in the Corso.</p> + +<p>Against the Procurator General of the Fisc, etc. He says +that no sentence can be given, unless in favour of the Fisc, and +so far as, etc., insists that he be granted delay for the purpose, +and in the meantime they cannot go on to any expediting of the +cause, except for reason given in full court, and by the vote of +the Lords thereof, and by testimony of the opposition in prison, +and without citing all who have interest, etc., this 18th day of +August, 1698.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Francesco Gambi</span>, <i>Procurator General of the Fisc</i>.</p> + +<p>I have made the above citation against the Fisc personally +this day, and against the others by copy, which was sent to their +homes, this August 18, 1698.</p> + +<p class="left45"> +<span class="smcap">Balatresius.</span><br /> +<span class="smcap">Aloysius Pichius</span>, <i>Substitute for the Fiscal General</i>.</p> + +<p class="p2 right"><i>August 19, 1698.</i></p> + +<p>When he had made statement of fact, Antonio Lamparelli, +Procurator, presented his case and petitioned as above. Thereupon +the Most Illustrious and Most Excellent Lord, Marcus +Antonius Venturinus, J.V.D., who holds the judicial bench, +for the Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Governor of our dear +City in criminal cases, gave sentence, as in this schedule, which +he has taken in his own hands, has seen, read, and subscribed, +and given and consigned to me as a notary for publication of +the following tenor, etc., in the presence of Antonio Bernardino +Piceno and Antonio Toparino of Caprarola, witnesses, etc.</p> + +<p>In favour of Domenico Tighetti, in the name, etc., against the +Fisc and those consorting with him in the suit.</p> + +<p>In the name of Christ, whom we have invoked, we who sit +for this Tribunal, and who have only God before our eyes, give +this as our definitive sentence, which we offer in these writings +by the advice of those skilled in law, in the cause or causes +which have been tried before ourselves in the first place, or in +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">254</a></span> +the second, and which are now being considered, between +Domenico Tighetti, as heir-beneficiary of the former Francesca +Pompilia, wife of the former Guido Franceschini of Arezzo, on +the one part; and the Fisc and Giovanni Maria Serbucci as +Procurator and Manager of the lawsuit of the former Guido +Franceschini, and Francesco Paracciani, Procurator of the +Monastery of Santa Maria Magdalena of the Convertites in the +Corso, for all their rights and parts in that interest, on the other +part; concerning and upon the pretended adultery committed +by the said former Francesca Pompilia with Canon Giuseppe +Maria Caponsacchi, and as regards other matters in the conduct +of the cause or causes of this kind, more fully deduced, etc. +By authority of the decree for the remission of the case, which +was made by the Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Auditor +S.S., by the acts of Pascasius, concerning which in the conduct, +etc., and for cause given in the Court, and by vote of the same, +we say, pronounce, declare, and finally adjudge from what has +been newly deduced, that <i>proof is not established as regards the +pretended adultery</i>, and therefore the memory of the same +Francesca Pompilia should be and is <i>entirely</i> restored to her +pristine good name and reputation; and that the same +Domenico Tighetti, in whose name the above was deduced, +should be and is absolved and liberated from each and all +disquietudes, molestations, vexations, and perturbations +brought, or threatened to be brought, by occasion of these as +on account of the statement of these we have restored, absolved, +and freed him, as above. And for this restitution and absolution +and freedom, we wish and command that it be held as law +that the suit or suits, of whatever nature, which have been +brought thereupon be abolished, as we abolish them. And we +charge that perpetual silence be imposed upon the Fisc and his +consorts in the suit. And we have thus spoken, pronounced, +declared, and finally given sentence, not only, etc.</p> + +<p>I, Marcus Antonius Venturinus, who hold the judicial bench +have so pronounced.</p> + +<p>Given on this 19th day of August, in the presence of Antonio +Bernardino Piceno, and Antonio Toparino of Caprarola, +Witnesses, etc.</p> + +<p class="p2 center"> +By the Most Illustrious Governor of the City in criminal cases, +or the Most Excellent Lord Venturini.</p> + +<p>Let the undernamed be cited for learning the appeal, and its +lawful prosecution for the first time, at the aforesaid instance +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">255</a></span> +of Domenico Tighetti, as principal heir-beneficiary of the +aforesaid Francesca Pompilia, formerly wife of Guido +Franceschini:</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Charitas.</span></p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4"> +The Honourable Giovanni Maria Serbucci,</span> as Procurator +and Manager of the legal proceedings of the said +former Guido Franceschini, as principal on the other +side.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">The Honourable Francesco Paracciani,</span> the Procurator of +the Venerable Monastery and Convent of St. Mary +Magdalene of the Convertites in the Corso for all, etc.</p> + +<p>I have made the said citation at his home, August 31, 1698.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Molinellus.</span></p> + +<p class="right p2"><i>September 1, 1698.</i></p> + +<p>When we had made statement of fact, R. D. Alexander +Cassar, Substitute Procurator of Charity, appeared, petitioned, +and was granted, as above.</p> + +<p class="p2 center"> +By the Most Illustrious Governor of the City in criminal causes, +or by the Most Excellent Lord Venturini.</p> + +<p>Let those named below be cited for learning of the appeal and +its legitimate prosecution this second time, at the aforesaid +instance of Domenico Tighetti, heir-beneficiary of the former +Francesca Pompilia, formerly wife of the former Guido Franceschini, +principal, or, etc.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Charitas.</span></p> + +<p class="i8"> +<span class="o4">D. Giovanni Maria Serbucci,</span> as Procurator and Manager +of the lawsuit brought by the former Guido Franceschini, +as the principal on the other side.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">D. Francesco Paracciani,</span> Procurator on the other side for +the Venerable Monastery and Convent of St. Mary +Magdalene of the Convertites in the Corso, for all, etc.</p> + +<p>September 1, 1698, I have made this.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Molinellus.</span></p> + +<p class="p2 center"> +By the Most Illustrious Governor in criminal causes, or by the +Most Excellent Lord Venturini.</p> + +<p>September 3. When he had made statement of fact, R. D. +Alexander Cassar, Substitute Procurator of the Poor, appeared, +petitioned, and was granted, as above.</p> + +<p>Let those named below, be cited for learning of the appeal +and its lawful prosecution, this third time, at the aforesaid +instance of Domenico Tighetti, heir-beneficiary of the former +Francesca Pompilia, wife of the former Guido Franceschini, +as principal, or, etc.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Charitas.</span> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">256</a></span></p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4"> +D. Giovanni Maria Serbucci,</span> as Procurator and Manager of +the lawsuit brought by the former Guido Franceschini, +as principal on the other side.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">D. Francesco Paracciani,</span> Procurator of the other side for +the Venerable Monastery and Convent of Santa Maria +Magdalena of the Convertites in the Corso, for all, etc. +</p> + +<p>I made this September 3, 1698.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Molinellus.</span></p> + +<p class="right p2"> +<span class="smcap">September</span> 4, 1698.</p> + +<p>When he had made statement of fact, R. D. Alexander Cassar, +Substitute Procurator of the Poor, appeared, petitioned, and +was granted as above.</p> + +<p class="p2 center"> +By the Governor in criminal causes, or the Most Excellent Lord +Venturini.</p> + +<p>Let those named below be cited for learning of the appeal and +its lawful prosecution, this fourth time, and of the final presentation, +and the decree, etc., at the aforesaid instance of Domenico +Tighetti, heir-beneficiary of the former Francesca Pompilia, +formerly wife of the former Guido Franceschini, as principal, +or, etc.</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Charitas.</span></p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4"> +D. Giovanni Maria Serbucci,</span> as Procurator and Manager +of the lawsuit brought by the former Guido Franceschini +as principal on the other side.</p> + +<p class="i8"><span class="o4">D. Francesco Paracciani,</span> as Procurator of the Venerable +Monastery and Convent of Santa Maria Magdalena in +the Corso, for all, etc.</p> + +<p>I have done this, September 4, 1698</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">Balatresius.</span></p> + +<p class="right p2"> +<i>September 5, 1698.</i></p> + +<p>When he had made statement of fact, R. D. Alexander Cassar, +Substitute Procurator of the Poor, appeared, petitioned, and +was granted, as above.</p> + +<p>I, Domenico Barlocci, Notary of the Court of Criminal Causes +of the Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Governor of the +City, as Notary for the Poor, have found this copy correct +by collating it, although it was extracted from the original +documents by one who is trustworthy in my eyes, etc. In +pledge of the above, I have subscribed and have published it, +as I am required to do.</p> + +<p>[The seal of the said Notary.]</p> + +<div class="pamphlet"> +<p>THE <a name="secondary_source" id="secondary_source"></a>SECONDARY SOURCE<br /> + +<span class="s2">OF</span><br /> + +<span class="b1">THE RING AND THE BOOK</span><br /> + +<span class="s1">A CONTEMPORARY MANUSCRIPT PAMPHLET</span></p> +</div> + +<p class="p6"><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">258</a></span></p> + +<p class="p2">"The following pages contain a MS. contemporaneous account +of the execution of the principal actors in the tragedy which has +been immortalised in the poem of the <i>Ring and the Book</i>.</p> + +<p>"I am enabled by the kindness of my friend, Mr. Browning, +to give it a place in these Miscellanies of the Philobiblion +Society."</p> + +<p class="right"> +<span class="smcap">John Simeon.</span></p> + +<p class="p2">(I shall not attempt to say with what a feeling I correct proof-sheets +received on the day subsequent to that which brought +the intelligence of the death of this great-hearted and noble-minded +man, characteristically good and gracious to the very +last.)</p> + +<p class="right"> +R. B., May 24, 1870.</p> + +<p class="p2">The above words are the introduction by Sir John Simeon and +the comment by the poet (Philobiblion Society Miscellanies, xii. +1868-9), on the reprint of the subsequent pamphlet in the original +Italian.</p> + +<p>It was found in London by one of Browning's acquaintances, +who, knowing the poet's interest in the subject, sent it to him. +Internal evidence indicates that it was probably written (but +not published) some few years after the crime, and it is more +popular in style than any part of <i>The Book</i>. The writer during +the first half of his pamphlet follows closely the affidavit of +Pompilia and the second anonymous pamphlet [<a href="#pamphlet15">No. 15</a>] of <i>The +Book</i>. He then adds much interesting information as to the +murder and the pursuit, arrest, trial, and execution of the +criminals. Browning uses almost every scrap of additional +information it affords. He accepts its fact with the same fidelity +he shows in using <i>The Book</i>, and uses it extensively and without +discounting its value as compared with the official record. It is +therefore treated as an essential portion of the present source-study. +Its new matter will be indicated by italics in the following +translation.</p> + +<p>Mrs. Orr has published somewhat less than half of the pamphlet +in her <i>Handbook</i> in translation, which has been reprinted in +the Camberwell Browning, and in the <i>Browning Guide Book</i> by +G. W. Cook. The present version is made directly from the +Italian text of the Philobiblion Society reprint. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">259</a></span></p> + +<p class="b1 p6 center">THE<br /> +DEATH OF THE WIFE-MURDERER GUIDO<br /> +FRANCESCHINI, BY BEHEADING</p> + +<p class="p2">Guido Franceschini, a nobleman of Arezzo, in Tuscany, had +stayed for some time here in Rome in the service of a person of +some eminence. He decided to take a wife with dowry enough +to be of advantage to his own house. When he had revealed this +desire to a certain hairdresser <i>near the Piazza Colonna</i>, she proposed +to him the Signora Francesca Pompilia, thirteen years of +age, the daughter of a certain Pietro Comparini and Violante +Peruzzi. For beside the promised dowry, she was heir to the +reversionary interest in bonds and other properties worth about +12,000 scudi. When he had heard of this advantageous dowry, +which seemed to him to be quite to his point, he lost no time in +revealing it to his brother Abate Paolo, who had dwelt here in +Rome for many years in the service of a Cardinal. He went +along with Guido to the mother of the young woman, as they +flattered themselves that they would succeed better in this way +than by demanding her of the father, who was somewhat hard to +approach. When they had made it appear that their income +was of considerable amount, they succeeded in their intent; +although it was then found out that their entire capital did not +amount to the total of their income as given in that note.</p> + +<p>It was easy for Franceschini to win over this woman, as <i>she +was driven by the ambition of establishing her daughter in the home +of persons of good birth</i>. She gave her own consent, and so +worked upon her husband as to induce him to sign the marriage +bond. Then when Comparini had been informed by a person +who knew the resources of Franceschini, that they were quite +different from what they had been represented to him, he changed +his mind, nor did he wish under any consideration to carry out +the marriage. <i>He gave as a pretext the very tender age of his +daughter</i>, along with other reasons. The mother of Francesca, +however, not seeing any chance to give her daughter to Franceschini, +had her secretly <i>married during December</i>, 1693, <i>in San +Lorenzo in Lucina</i>. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">260</a></span></p> + +<p>When this marriage reached the ears of Comparini, he was +much angered at Violante. But she had such a gift of gab that +Comparini not only agreed to it, but beside the dowry of 2,600 +scudi, <i>on which he had already paid</i>700 <i>scudi, he also made gift +of his entire possessions to the couple</i>.</p> + +<p>After several days, Franceschini decided to conduct his wife +and her parents back to Arezzo, <i>and this took place in the same +December</i>. When they had arrived there, the parents of the +wife could see that the state of their son-in-law was much worse +than they had imagined it. Therefore they were all the more +embittered at the penuriousness they showed in the food, and +many other matters. <i>One morning while they were at the table +they heard their daughter</i> [Violante according to <i>The Book</i>] <i>denied +fire for warming her bed</i>, and saw the Franceschini practise +many other cruelties toward her. They were much troubled at +it, and <i>all the more so when they saw a Canon of the Franceschini +household, a brother of the husband, rush upon their daughter</i> +[Violante according to <i>The Book</i>]. <i>He struck Francesca with a +dagger in his hand, who had to make her escape by running into a +room and shutting the door. Then one evening her father went to +visit a friend, and when he had come back home he found the door +shut. Therefore his daughter, who was still awake, was obliged to +go downstairs to open it for him, but not without first having called +her husband, who never even opened an eye. Then when she had +gone down to open the door and had gone outside a few steps to meet +her father, all of a sudden she found herself shut outside the house +along with her father. For that reason they were both of them +obliged to sleep outside of the house that night, her father at the inn +and the daughter at one of the neighbours.</i> Therefore, more and +more, as the days passed, the Comparini decided to return to +Rome. But as they were without money they were obliged to +beg it of Franceschini, who <i>scarcely gave them the necessary +expenses of the journey</i>.</p> + +<p>When the old Comparini had departed, Franceschini thought +to hide what had happened. He constrained his wife to write +to Rome to the Abate, his brother, to tell him that she cherished +in her heart his memory. This letter was dictated by the +husband himself. The ignorant girl did as Guido wished, whose +purpose was to have it believed that his parents-in-law were the +fomentors of the dissension which prevailed between the couple +and the relatives of Franceschini.</p> + +<p>When the Comparini had reached Rome, ill-contented as they +were with the house of their son-in-law, for whom they now saw +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">261</a></span> +they had sacrificed their daughter, they did not know how to +hold their peace about that matter, of which they themselves +had been the cause. All the more so when they were harassed +for the remainder of the dowry, beside the fact that they saw +the rest of their property in danger. While affairs were in this +state a Jubilee was announced; under these circumstances +Violante Comparini revealed in confession that Francesca Pompilia, +who was married to Franceschini, was not their daughter, +but that the birth had been pretended. She had in fact been +born of a <i>poor widow, a foreigner</i>, and had then been adopted to +bring it about that the reversionary interest would fall to their +house, and hence to make good the many debts of her husband. +<i>When the confessor heard this, he charged her to reveal all the affair +to her husband himself. Violante obeyed, and Comparini was +greatly surprised at it, and rebuked his wife sharply.</i> He then +submitted the matter to judgment before Monsignor Tomati; +the following was spoken in sentence: It should be maintained +that Francesca Pompilia shall be and is in quasi-possession of +her relationship as daughter. Therefore appeal was taken by +Comparini to the Tribunal of the Sacred Rota, but the suit still +remains undecided. In the meantime the Franceschini, seeing +that they had been deluded by this circumstance, since they +could not get possession of the residue of the dowry, redoubled +their cruelties to the poor Pompilia even to the point of threatening +her with death. Hence she was very often obliged to save +herself by fleeing into some other house, or before the authorities, +or even into the presence of the Bishop, <i>whom she finally begged +to save her by putting her in some monastery</i>. But this prelate +thought it better to send her back to her husband's home, urging +him not to mistreat her.</p> + +<p>When the unfortunate woman saw that the admonitions of +this Bishop had been useless, and that this way of softening the +heart of her husband and his relatives had proved vain, and +when they reproved her for sterility and for coquetry, and for +other faults of their own imagining, she betook herself to an +Augustinian, Romano, that he might write to his Superiors or +to her parents to find some provision for her. But although the +Father promised to do as she desired, his letters never reached +their destination. The wretched woman was therefore desperate +and determined to get to Rome in some manner or other. She +told the whole matter to Canon Conti, a relative of the Franceschini, +to whom she made a most pathetic picture of her situation. +He was moved thereby, and answered that he would aid her, as +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">262</a></span> +he did, by offering to have her taken to Rome by Canon Caponsacchi, +his friend, since he himself ought not and could not do it. +When the circumstances had been told to Caponsacchi, he was +opposed to it, for fear of incurring the anger of the Franceschini; +but when he had been urged both by Conti and the woman, he +consented thereto. And on the last Monday of April the wife +arose from bed as soon as day dawned, without her husband +knowing about it. She took some things of her own, some +jewels, and money, left the house, and at the gate of the city +found Caponsacchi, who was awaiting her with a carriage. +They mounted together and set out on the road toward Rome.</p> + +<p>When Franceschini awoke and discovered the flight of his +wife, as he already suspected that she had started for Rome, he +began to pursue her, and on the following Tuesday [should be +Wednesday] overtook her at Castelnuovo in the post-house, +where she was in company with Caponsacchi. The young +woman was not at all terrified at the sight of her husband, but +on the contrary she mustered her courage and reproved him for +all the cruelties practised upon her, because of which she had +been forced to this step. Then Franceschini was thunderstruck, +and did not know how or what to respond. Hence he thought +it best to have recourse to the authorities. The fugitives were +arrested by the Governor of the place, and both of them were +taken to Rome and placed in the New Prisons, and were charged +with adultery because they had run away together. He tried to +prove the charge by certain love-letters which had been found, +and by the deposition of the driver. But as the adultery was +not proved, the Canon was condemned for three years to Civita +Vecchia, and the wife was shut into the monastery of the +Scalette on the Lungara.</p> + +<p>When the husband therefore saw that this had not helped +him in gaining the dowry, he decided to go back to his own +country, leaving the care of his case in the hands of his brother, +the Abate, who was in the service of a Cardinal. But although +the Abate tried by many a turn to succeed in his intent before +the tribunals, he could not achieve it. Hence he also decided +to leave Rome. And he was spurred all the more by its +becoming known that his sister Pompilia was with child. For +this reason, the Governor of Rome had constrained him to +consent that she should keep her own home as a prison, under +security of 300 scudi to present herself at every demand of the +Tribunal. The Abate indeed was unwilling to give his consent +unless Pietro Comparini should first assume obligation, by an +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">263</a></span> +official document, to furnish her with food. <i>And then, when he +had obtained the permission of his Cardinal, he sold his furniture +and books</i>, and when he had made them pay over the 47 scudi +which had been found upon Pompilia at Castelnuovo, he left +Rome. After that Pompilia bore a son, <i>whom she named +Gaetano, after the saint to whom she made her vows</i>.</p> + +<p>Franceschini, who was now overwhelmed with manifold +troubles, and was urged on now by honour and again by self-interest +to take vengeance, at last yielded to his base thoughts +and planned to kill his sixteen-year-old wife and her parents. +When four other criminals had been admitted to the scheme, +he left Arezzo, <i>and on Christmas eve reached Rome. He stopped +at Ponte Milvio, where there was a villa of his brother. There he +remained in hiding with his followers until a time opportune for +the execution of his designs should come.</i></p> + +<p>They spied out all the ways of the Comparini family, and on +January 2, <i>which was Thursday</i>, at about seven o'clock in the +evening, he approached the Comparini home with his companions. +He left on guard at the street door Biagio Agostinelli +and Domenico Gambassini, and knocked at the door. When he +had said that he brought a letter of Canon Caponsacchi from +Civita Vecchia the door was opened to him. Immediately this +cut-throat Franceschini, assisted by the other two criminals, +leaped upon Violante who had opened it and struck her dead +to the ground. Pompilia in this crisis extinguished the light, +hoping thus to escape the assassins, <i>and ran to the neighbouring +door of a locksmith crying out for help. But when she saw that +Franceschini was provided with a lantern she went to hide under +the bed</i>; but she was dragged from there, and was barbarously +slain <i>with 22 wounds</i> by the hand of her husband. Not content +with that, he dragged her to the feet of Comparini, who was +likewise wounded by one of the other assassins, <i>and was crying +out</i> "<i>confession</i>."</p> + +<p><i>When the uproar of this horrible slaughter was heard abroad, +people ran thither, but the criminals succeeded in escaping. But +in their haste one of them left his cloak, and Franceschini his +cap, which betrayed him afterward.</i> The unfortunate Francesca +Pompilia, under the burden of such wounds as those with which +she had been cut to pieces, <i>implored the Holy Virgin for the +favour of confession, and obtained her prayer</i>. Hence she survived +some little while, and <i>was able to tell about this horrible crime. +She told that after the deed was done her husband had asked of +one of the cut-throats who had done the murder with him, if she were</i> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">264</a></span> +<i>indeed dead. When that one had assured him, he replied: "Let +us lose no time, but return to the vineyard."</i> And so they made +their escape. <i>In the meantime the police had been summoned, +and came with a captain. A confessor was quickly called and also +a surgeon who gave his attention to the luckless girl.</i></p> + +<p>When the Governor had been informed of the outcome, he +<i>immediately despatched Captain Patrizi</i> to arrest the criminals. +<i>When the posse arrived at the vineyard, he found that these were no +longer there, but that about an hour ago they had left in the direction +of the highway. Then Patrizi followed without interrupting his +journey, and when he had reached the inn he learned from the host +that Franceschini had demanded horses with threat of violence, but +they had been denied him, because he lacked the necessary order.</i> +Hence he had travelled afoot with his companions toward +Baccano. <i>Patrizi continued his march, and, after taking the +necessary precautions</i>, arrived at the tavern of Merluzza. There +he found the assassins, who were straightway arrested. On +them were found, still stained with blood, those daggers with +which they had done the murders, and <i>upon Franceschini were +found 150 scudi in money. This arrest indeed cost the life of +Patrizi, because having been overheated and wounded with a slight +scratch he died in a few days.</i></p> + +<p><i>Franceschini's dagger was of a Genoese pattern, triangular, and +with certain hooks made in such a way that in wounding they could +not be drawn from the wound without such laceration as to render +the wound incurable.</i></p> + +<p><i>When the criminals were known to be at Ponte Milvio, in that +very inn they were heard on their preliminary examinations by +notaries and judges sent there expressly, and satisfactory confession +was had.</i></p> + +<p><i>When the capture of the delinquents was known in Rome, a +countless throng of people rushed thither to see them, while all the +criminals were tied to their horses and conducted to Rome. It is +told that Franceschini, while making the journey, asked one of +the officers how in the world the crime had ever been discovered. +And when he was answered that his wife, whom they had found +still living, had revealed it, he was so astounded that he was, as it +were, deprived of his senses. About five o'clock in the evening +they reached the prisons. A certain Francesco Pasquini, of the +town of Castello, and Alessandro Baldeschi of the same town, both +of them 22 years old, along with Guido Franceschini had been the +slayers of the Comparini. And Gambassini and Agostinelli were +those who had stood guard at the street door.</i> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">265</a></span></p> + +<p><i>In the meantime there were exposed in San Lorenzo, in Lucina +the bodies of the assassinated Comparini, who were so disfigured, +and especially the wife of Franceschini, by wounds in the face that +they were no longer recognisable.</i> The unfortunate Francesca, +when she had taken sacrament and had pardoned her murderers, +and had made her own will, died, not yet having completed her +seventeenth year. This was on the 6th, which was the day of +the Epiphany. She was able to justify herself against all the +calumnies inflicted by her husband. <i>The surprise of the people +at seeing the said bodies was great, because of the atrocity of +the deed, which truly made them shudder</i>, seeing that two old +septuagenarians and a young girl of 17 years had so wretchedly +perished.</p> + +<p>As the trial of the criminals advanced, there were many +arguments made on the matter, laying stress on all the more +aggravating circumstances which accompanied this horrible +massacre. Others also were made in the defence with much +erudition, especially by the Advocate of the Poor, who was a +certain Monsignor Spreti. He succeeded in delaying the +sentence, because Baldeschi made denial, even though "the +cord" was administered to him twice, under which he swooned. +Finally he confessed, and the others did likewise. <i>They also +revealed that they had planned to kill Franceschini himself, and to +rob him of his money, because he had not kept his word to pay +them as soon as they left Rome.</i></p> + +<p>On February 22 was seen <i>in the Piazza del Popolo a great +platform with mannaia, and two great gallows, which had been +built for the execution of the criminals. Many stands were constructed +for the accommodation of those curious to see such a +terrible execution, and so great was the concourse of people that +some windows brought as much as six dollars each. At the eighth +hour [2 a.m.] Franceschini and his companions were informed of +their death and were placed in the Consorteria. There they were +assisted by Abate Panciatichi and Cardinal Acciajoli, nor did they +delay in preparing themselves to die well. At the 20th hour +[2 p.m.] the Company of Death and of Pity arrived at the Prisons. +The condemned were made to go downstairs, and were placed upon +separate carts to be drawn to the place of execution.</i></p> + +<p><i>The first to mount the cart was Agostinelli, the second Gambassini, +the third Pasquini, the fourth Baldeschi, and the fifth Franceschini, +who showed more intrepidity and composure than the others, to the +wonder of all.</i></p> + +<p><i>They left the Prison and followed the Pilgrims Street, the Street</i> +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">266</a></span> +<i>of the Governor, of Pasquini, Piazza Navona, the Pantheon, +Piazza Colonna, and the Corso.</i></p> + +<p><i>The first who was executed was Agostinelli, the second Gambassini, +the third Pasquini, the fourth Baldeschi, and the last Franceschini. +When the last-named had mounted the platform, he asked pardon +for his sins, and begged them to pray for his soul, adding that they +should say a Pater, an Ave, and Salve Regina for him. When he +had made the confessor announce that he was reconciled, he adjusted +his neck upon mannaia and, with the name of Jesus on his lips, +he was beheaded. The head was then shown to the people by the +executioner.</i></p> + +<p><i>Franceschini was low of stature, thin and pallid, with prominent +nose, black hair and a heavy beard, and was</i> fifty years of age. +<i>He wore the same garb as when he committed the crime—that is a +coat of brown cloth, black shirt, a vest of goatshair, a white hat +and cotton cap; clothed presumably as he had been when he had +set out from Arezzo.</i></p> + +<p>The execution took place during the <i>Pontificate of Innocent +XII.</i>, in 1698.</p> + +<p class="b1 p6 center"><a name="trial" id="trial"></a>TRIAL AND DEATH OF<br /> +FRANCESCHINI AND HIS COMPANIONS<br /> +<span class="s2">FOR THE</span><br /> + +<span class="s1">MURDER OF COMPARINI, HIS WIFE, AND DAUGHTER</span><br /> +<span class="s2">WHICH HAPPENED DURING THE TIME OF INNOCENT XII.</span></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">268</a></span></p> + +<p class="p6 b1 center">EDITORIAL NOTE</p> + +<p class="p2">The following additional account of the Franceschini murder case +was discovered a few years ago in the Royal Casanatense Library, +Rome (Misc. MS. 2037), in a volume entitled <i>Varii successi +curiosi e degni di esser considerate</i>, containing thirteen pamphlets +by various authors, most of them concerning famous criminal +trials, from Rome of the seventeenth century. The volume is in +a hand of the early eighteenth century, and contains an endorsement +to the effect that a copy was made from it in 1746. The +Franceschini murder is the subject of the tenth narrative of the +volume. Internal evidences indicate that it was written somewhat +later than the secondary source pamphlet, by one who has +considerable knowledge of the crime and whose attitude of +mind shows him to have been a priest. It presents a better +story and a fuller account of the motives of the actors, especially +those of Abate Paolo and Violante, together with a number of +additional matters of fact not contained in <i>The Book</i>. It never +fell in Browning's way, and hence has no immediate source-relation +to the poem, but it does prove in some cases the +accuracy of Browning's conjectures of unknown facts when +definite data failed him.</p> + +<p>The pamphlet was printed in translation by W. Hall Griffin +in the <i>Monthly Review</i>, November 1900. The present version +has been made by the editor from a transcript of the original +Italian executed by a friend in Rome.—C.W.H.</p> + +<p class="b1 p6 center">TRIAL AND DEATH OF FRANCESCHINI AND<br /> +HIS COMPANIONS</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">269</a></span></p> + +<p class="center">FOR THE</p> + +<p class="b1 center">MURDER OF COMPARINI, HIS WIFE,<br /> +AND DAUGHTER</p> + +<p class="center">WHICH HAPPENED DURING THE TIME OF<br /> +INNOCENT XII.</p> + +<p>The Abate Franceschini, born in Arezzo, Tuscany, of a family +which was noble, but poor of estate, having the cleverness to +advance his own fortunes, proceeded to the city of Rome, and +was admitted by Cardinal Lauria into his household as Secretary +of the Embassy. His inherent mental aptness won for him the +favour of the Cardinal, who was held in great esteem in the +Sacred College by reason of his learning, and who stood so high +that he might well have aspired to the Papal Chair. In this +lucky juncture, Abate Paolo, wishing to take advantage of his +good fortune, thought to provide a wife for his brother Guido +and to recoup his family fortunes by a rich dowry. Guido had +served Cardinal Nerli in the same capacity, as Secretary of the +Embassy; but either because he had not the good luck or the +ability of his brother he left that service. Although Paolo knew +that the idle state of his brother would be hurtful to his claims of +dowry, he did not cease aspiring to a very advantageous one, +flattering himself that his own distinction might make up for the +shortcomings of his brother.</p> + +<p>Now Guido had reached full maturity, was of weak temperament, +ordinary in appearance, of a disposition more gloomy than +pleasant, and, moreover, was of scant means. Hence, unless +Abate Paolo should use his own influence, he could have little +expectation for Guido. After having attempted several alliances +of high rank, Paolo fixed his thought on Francesca Pompilia, +the daughter of Pietro and Violante Comparini. As she +was their only child, and as her parents were too far advanced +in years to have other offspring, she would fall heir to a reversionary +interest of 12,000 scudi; and he hoped that he could +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">270</a></span> +easily make the match, as the Comparini were rather inferior to +him in birth.</p> + +<p>A certain hairdresser frequented the home of the Comparini +with the familiarity admitted by those women who desire to +make themselves appear more beautiful to their husbands' eyes +than they are and which some husbands tolerate who rely too +much upon the fidelity of their wives. Paolo considered this +woman to be the best means for aiding his designs for the marriage +of Guido, and the latter often went to her shop with the purpose +of winning her confidence by odd jobs. When he had often +turned the talk to the subject of taking a wife, she told him one +day he might readily apply for the daughter of the Comparini, +for she had a suitable dowry, besides being heiress to a reversionary +interest, and was of a small family connection, which +were his very requirements. When through her efforts he had +succeeded in achieving the marriage, it was understood he should +reward her with 200 scudi. The hairdresser lost no time in +broaching the matter to Violante, who, anxious for the advancement +of her daughter and for the establishment of her own +interests, agreed to speak of it to her husband, and, if the matter +were as stated, to persuade him to effect it. Violante spoke to +her husband about it and he did not reject the proposal, provided +that the vaunted riches of the Franceschini were verified, but he +said this would have to be given in a written statement attested +by well-known and reliable persons. When the hairdresser had +carried back this word to the Franceschini, they sent a statement +of their real estate in Arezzo, with an income amounting to 1700 +scudi, attested by persons well known to the Comparini, and who +confirmed it to them orally.</p> + +<p>Abate Paolo, fearing lest this fortune might escape him, gave +them no time to change their minds, and in order to make the +matter surer he desired to secure it by the hand of Cardinal +Lauria, his patron, by whom he had the marriage agreement +drawn up; for his Eminence was pleased to show kindness to +the advantage of a man whom he regarded with some favour. +Meanwhile Comparini had become better informed of the rank +and property of the Franceschini and found them far different +from the preceding account, both in rank and in property. +Therefore he had a warm dispute with his wife, who persisted in +the marriage, and declared that he had been advised by persons +envious of the good fortune of one or the other house, and who +wished to hinder it, and that she was not shaken in her original +desire; for she was very sure, from other truthful witnesses, that +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">271</a></span> +the Franceschini were of the first rank of nobility of Arezzo, and +not of the second, as those had said, and that the property +given in the list had been untampered with. But the more she +warmed to the matter, the cooler became Pietro; for being very +diplomatic, if he could not gain, at least he wished not to lose by +the marriage of his daughter. But what does not a man lose +when he allows his wife to rule him? He loved her so tenderly +that from the first day of their marriage he had constituted her +the arbitress of his wishes. Violante, nevertheless, fearing lest +Pietro, in a case of such importance, might be more influenced +by reason than by flattery, could suffer no delay in making secure +the reversionary interest which another house could claim if the +Comparini were without an heir; she therefore resolved to have +the marriage performed without the knowledge of Pietro. +When she had secured the consent of the daughter, who was +always obedient to her commands, and had made an appointment +with Guido, she conducted her, suitably clothed, one morning +to San Lorenzo, in Lucina, and espoused the two.</p> + +<p>Pietro felt the blow keenly, but being unable to find any +remedy for it, he cloaked his anger with the show of being displeased +at not having been present, and this displeasure would +cease in him with the joy of the nuptial feast, which should be in +their house. He assigned to his daughter as dowry twenty-six +bonds, with future succession to the remainder. On the very +same day, after talking of the advantages which would result to +both houses from the union of their interests, they decided upon +the removal of the Comparini to Arezzo, which followed in a few +days, and with it the absolute administration of the property +by Guido.</p> + +<p>When they had reached Arezzo the Comparini were received +by the mother and relatives of Franceschini with all that show +of love which is customary on such occasions. But very soon, +from constant association, disturbances arose, and thence they +passed to hostilities. The mother of Guido, a proud, avaricious +woman, who governed the household despotically, took to stinting +it even in the necessary food. This moved the Comparini +to complaints, to which the Franceschini first responded with +insults and then with threats. This was a thing Violante could +not tolerate, for, being a woman, she had her own share of +natural arrogance. So she began tormenting Pietro, cursing the +day when he had decided to move to Arezzo, laying the blame +on him for all that of which she had been the cause. And +Pietro, who was one of those men who let themselves be overcome +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">272</a></span> +by a couple of crocodile tears of their wives, instead of +reproving her for the undertaking (although she had concluded +the marriage against his wish and without his knowledge), +entreated her affectionately to bear with patience the abuses, +which would possibly cease when the Franceschini saw them +defended by their daughter.</p> + +<p>At that time [November 30, 1693] passed from this life to +Heaven Cardinal Lauria, a churchman of merit beyond all praise. +Then Abate Paolo was elected Secretary in Rome of the Religious +Order of Malta. At this the haughtiness of the Franceschini +increased so much that they considered it grand good fortune +for the Comparini to be considered their friends, not to say their +relatives. Violante being no longer able to live under the proud +command of another woman, since she had been in the habit of +domineering, as her husband had been subject to her wishes, so +tormented him that she induced him to take up his residence in +Rome again. For this purpose the Franceschini gave them a +sum of money sufficient for the journey and for the most necessary +furniture in the home.</p> + +<p>Scarcely had they reached Rome when, to the surprise of +everybody, it was reported that Pietro had dispatched a judicial +warning, in which he set forth that Francesca Pompilia was not +really his own daughter and that therefore he was not obliged +to pay the dowry. He brought the attestation of Violante his +wife, who had declared that to check her husband's creditors in +the matter of the trust fund and to enjoy the income of the bonds +she had feigned to be pregnant and, that her husband might not +discover the trick, she agreed with him that when she became +pregnant they should abstain from association until after the +birth of their child. And so, on the very day of this pretence, +they took separate bedrooms; still further, by well-arranged +clothes, she feigned the swelling of the womb, and by suitable +drugs made pretence of nausea until her time was come. She +then took advantage of a day when Pietro was occupied in his +lawsuits, to bring forth the pretended birth, which was well +carried out by the sagacity of a midwife in the secret, who provided +whatever was necessary. And that the house servant +might not detect the trick, they sent him to the apothecary to +secure certain medicines. At the same time the midwife went +to get a little creature whom she had received the day before +from a neighbour, who was already in the secret. When she had +returned to the house she summoned a familiar friend of the +Comparini from a window. Matters were so well arranged that +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">273</a></span> +when the woman arrived, there was nothing more to do than to +make her believe what was not really so. And to trick more +surely the thought of this neighbour, they feigned that when +Violante wished to pass from the bed to a chair, she fainted into +the arms of the woman by reason of her pains, since the midwife +could not run up in time.</p> + +<p>This unexpected act of Pietro, which became known in Rome +immediately, was heard with less wonder than scorn. The just +anger of the Franceschini would have undertaken due vengeance +if it had not been mitigated by the hope that, since Pompilia +was not the true and legitimate daughter of Pietro and Violante, +the marriage would be annulled and Guido's wounded reputation +would be healed. But when he had taken counsel with several +authorities and found they were of different opinions, he was +unwilling to risk so doubtful an affair, in the promotion of which +they would necessarily confess and presuppose that she was not +the daughter of the Comparini, and by this confession they +would be prejudiced in their claims to the dowry. They opposed +the judicial notice, and obtained for Pompilia the continuance of +her quasi-relation as daughter, together with a decree for the +transfer of the dowry bonds. But Pietro appealed to the +Signature of Justice so trickily that the Franceschini had the +expense of the transfer, but not the enjoyment of the income, +since they obtained from it not even a two months' payment.</p> + +<p>The unfortunate Pompilia was the victim of the hatred of +these two houses; for she was left alone in Arezzo at the will of +her husband, her mother-in-law, and her relatives, who were +mortally offended at her parents, and she was hourly threatened +with death. In so deplorable a state the courage even of a more +mature woman would have failed, not to speak of that of a girl +only sixteen years old. For she was innocent of the wiles of her +mother and of the duplicity of her father and by her own good +qualities she was worthy of tenderness rather than cruelty. +The unhappy one suffered as best she could these tyrannies +which were ever increasing, but despairing of all hope of peace, +she often had recourse to the Governor of the City, that he might +interpose his authority with the Franceschini. As this was of +no avail, she threw herself at the feet of the Bishop, who had +Guido come into his presence and who tried to reconcile him. +But Guido's anger increased all the more because of this public +recourse, and he threatened Pompilia with certain death if she +should ever try it again.</p> + +<p>When the poor child saw every way to peace closed against +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">274</a></span> +her she appealed to Canon Conti, a relative of the Franceschini, +who was very well informed of her wretchedness because he +visited the house, and she begged him to save her life, which +was in continual peril. He was moved to pity, for he knew +that she had no other remedy than flight. As he could not +personally assist in this, lest he would have to bear the hatred of +the entire family connection, he suggested to her that the very +person for such an enterprise was the Canon Caponsacchi, his +intimate friend and somewhat related to him by blood, whose +courage was no less ready to meet danger than to overcome it.</p> + +<p>Pompilia accepted the counsel of Conti, who lost no time in +opening the affair with Caponsacchi. He at first showed some +unwillingness, as he hesitated to carry away a wife from her +husband, even with the sole purpose of conducting her to her +own parents. But when he had been fully informed of the insufferable +abuses of Guido and his relatives his pity prevailed +over all other considerations and he accepted the undertaking. +Pompilia, who was eager for this, tried to win him by letters +and amorous verses, yet always keeping herself true to her +marriage vows, as one may read in her letters. In some of these +she praises the modesty of Caponsacchi, in others she reproves +him for having sent some octaves which were slightly reprehensible, +and she urged him to keep unstained that nobility of +which he boasted. On the day appointed for flight, with the +assistance of Canon Conti, the two took their places in a carriage +and travelled as fast as they could, without resting save when +it was necessary to change horses. They arrived the second +morning at dawn at Castelnuovo, and, in spite of the fact that +the host had assigned them a bed for repose, Pompilia seated +herself in a chair and Caponsacchi went down to the stable to +urge on the driver.</p> + +<p>When Guido awoke after the flight of Pompilia and perceived +that she was not in bed, he arose in a fury, and, seeing the jewel-box +open and minus the jewels and money, which it had contained, +he surmised what had happened to him. Accordingly, +on a good horse, he sped along the Roman road and overtook +the fugitives at the abovesaid inn of Castelnuovo an hour after +their arrival. When Pompilia saw him, with that courage +which desperation may arouse even in the weakest spirits, she +seized Caponsacchi's sword which lay upon the table, unsheathed +it, and thrust at his life, calling him betrayer and tyrant. Guido, +fearing lest her spirit no less than the valour of Caponsacchi +might bring his death rather than revenge, turned his horse and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">275</a></span> +rushed to the authorities. He had the fugitives arrested and +conveyed to the New Prisons, where he entered charge of flight +and adultery against them.</p> + +<p>The Abate Paolo who, as has been said, was the Secretary of +the Religious Order of Malta in Rome, made noisy recourse for +his honour to the Pope, and he put a petition before Monsignor +Pallavicino, the Governor, demanding that he declare Caponsacchi +the seducer of his sister-in-law, and both of them guilty +of adultery, and that his brother for that reason was entitled +to gain the entire dowry. Legal proceedings were instituted +against them according to the most rigorous forms of law, but +no proof of guilt was found against Caponsacchi and Pompilia +except the love-letters written at the time of the arranging of +the flight, the undertaking of the flight itself, and the deposition +of the driver. For the latter declared that he had sometimes +seen, when he had turned back during the journey, that they +were joined face to face, that is cheek to cheek, a matter which +did not make full proof of fault, since the rough roads and the +headlong speed of the journey jostling them about might have +been the cause of it. Wherefore the Court deemed it prudent +and just to sentence Caponsacchi to three years' relegation in +Civita Vecchia for his rashness in running away with a wife from +her husband, even though the motive was pity. While the case +of the Franceschini against Pompilia was on trial, Pompilia was +transported with their consent, as their prisoner, into the +Monastery of the Scalette on the Lungara, with the obligation +that Guido, her husband, should provide her food. There, +after a little while, it was discovered that she was pregnant, and +as it no longer comported with the reverence of that place that +she should remain there, with the consent of Abate Paolo, who +had power of attorney for his brother, Monsignor the Governor +ordered that she should pass into the home of the Comparini, +her parents, under security of 300 scudi to keep it as a secure +prison; and he declared that Guido's obligation for her food +should cease the very day she left the monastery.</p> + +<p>This cause, in which the Franceschini were not obliged to have +hand for mere honour's sake, was seen to have its chief motive +in selfishness. Therefore there was not a company where the +conduct of one or the other party was not censured. For this +reason the Religious Order of Malta gave secret intimation to +Abate Paolo that he should resign his office. At the loss of this +honourable post, rein was given to the evil tongues of his adversaries. +This put Abate Paolo in such straits that, ashamed to +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">276</a></span> +meet his dearest friends, he decided to leave Rome and to pass +to a clime where information of the dishonour that so afflicted +him would never come.</p> + +<p>When Guido was informed of the departure of his brother and +of the obligation resting on him of repairing the honour of his +house, he thought that to go into voluntary exile, as his brother +had done, would only prove the baseness of his own mind. For +he had been justly charged with this, since at the time he had +overtaken his wife with her abductor he had failed in that very +place to take the vengeance which was demanded at his hands.</p> + +<p>In due time Pompilia had given birth to a son, who was sent +out of the house by the Comparini to nurse. Thereupon every +one believed, and especially Violante, that the ties of blood +would move Guido to a reconciliation with his wife. For in +spite of their declaration that Pompilia was not their daughter, +the minds of the Comparini might still be disposed to some +reconciliation. But Guido's thought was quite different, for +he was continually stirred, even in the absence of Abate Paolo, +to plot the removal from this world of the entire memory of his +dishonour by the death of Pompilia, Pietro, and Violante, and +possibly of still others.</p> + +<p>Guido had in his employ, in the country, a daring and wicked +labourer [Alessandro Baldeschi] to whom he often exaggerated +the shame which his wife and the Comparini had brought upon +his house. To him Guido revealed that with his assistance he +wished to purge with their blood the stain to his honour. The +cut-throat straightway accepted and declared that, if there were +need of other company, he had three or four friends for whom +he would vouch. Guido replied that he should take three bold +and trusty ones to make sure against any possible resistance, +and should use all care to secure them at the lowest possible +price.</p> + +<p>When all had been agreed upon, and arms suitable for the +affair had been prepared, Guido, with his four companions in +disguise, secretly took the road to Rome. Reaching the home +of the Comparini at eight o'clock in the evening, one of them +knocked at the door, and when Pietro responded, the murderer +told him that he had a letter to give him which had been sent +from Civita Vecchia by Caponsacchi. When the women heard +this they told Pietro to have him come back again next morning, +urging him not to open the door. But he was curious about the +news from Caponsacchi, and when the murderer replied that he +could not come back in the morning, as he was obliged to leave +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">277</a></span> +that night, he opened the fatal door and thereby admitted his +own death and that of Violante and Pompilia.</p> + +<p>Guido in a transport of rage leaped in with two companions, +leaving the others on guard. They first dealt the poor old man +many blows, and deprived him of life before he could lift his +voice. Scarcely had the unfortunate women seen this when, +transfixed with like wounds, they suffered the same fate. Upon +the unfortunate Pompilia fell the blows of her husband, accompanied +with countless insults, and after he had trampled her +several times under foot and wounded her anew, not trusting +his own fury, he told his companions to see if she were really +dead. One of them lifted her by the hair and let her fall again, +and assured Guido that she was no longer alive.</p> + +<p>When this barbarous murder had been concluded and the +money agreed upon had been paid to the cut-throats, Guido +wished to leave them, but they would not allow him to desert +them for fear that one might kill another, as frequently happens +for hiding such misdeeds. Or else the murderers, while united +with their leader, had agreed to kill Guido as they thought he +might have a large sum of money. Hence they did not consent +to his leaving them and they took the road toward Arezzo +together, which they agreed to make on foot, as they could not +secure posthorses.</p> + +<p>From these repeated wounds Pietro and Violante were quite +dead, but not Pompilia, though her wounds were more numerous. +For because of her innocence she was especially helped by the +divine mercy, and she knew so well how to feign death that she +deceived the murderers. When she saw that they were gone, +with her dying breath she mustered sufficient strength of voice +to make the neighbours hear her cries for help.</p> + +<p>They found her in the last extremities, and eagerly ministered +first to her soul and then to her body. Her wounds were so +numerous and of such a nature that although they did not +immediately kill her, they made her death certain. This +occurred a few days later, to the sorrow of all those who assisted +her and who had knowledge of this pitiable case. The fortitude +with which she suffered the pains of her treatment caused as +much wonder as her resignation to the Divine Will caused love. +She not only did not blame the cruelty of her husband, but with +fervent prayers she besought God to pardon him. The compassion +of her assistants both for her soul and for her body I +attest by the following sworn statement concerning not only her +innocence, but the happy passage of her pure soul to heaven. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">278</a></span> +[Then follow the affidavits of Fra Celestino and others given +in <i>The Book</i>].</p> + +<p>Divine justice, which would not suffer so atrocious a deed to +go unpunished, caused the criminals to be overtaken by the +authorities at the break of dawn at an inn a few miles from +Rome. For when they had eaten a little, they went to sleep +by the fire, fatigued by the journey and overcome with drowsiness. +The police rushed violently in upon them and, pointing +carbines at their breasts, assailed and bound them at once. +They were straightway taken to the New Prisons, and the +Governor apprised the Pope of this barbarous murder and of the +arrest of the guilty. He gave commands that, without delay +and with all rigour, trial should be brought, this being a case +which, by reason of the consequences which might arise from +it, should be examined into with very special attention.</p> + +<p>Far less torment than would seem to be necessary had to be +applied to get the confession of the murderers and of Guido, who +more than the rest had stood by his denial. But at the sight +of torment he had not the heart to resist longer and confessed +fully, saying indeed that the crime had had no other motive +than the reparation of his honour which had been so publicly +offended. This was a matter which any common man would +have undertaken, not to speak of himself, who was a gentleman; +and if on his first examination he denied the truth of this, he +had done so lest he might injure his companions, who had aided +him in a deed worthy of all sympathy, because he had honour +as his sole end.</p> + +<p>With the confession of Guido and its ratification by the rest, +the process was finished, and they were sentenced, the cut-throats +to the gallows and Guido to mannaia, a means of death conceded +rather out of respect for his being in clerical orders than for +any other reason. The Advocate and Procurator of the Poor +had written so ably in their defence on the point of honour that +there is no memory of more learned arguments. But the +features of the crime were so many (and all of them punishable +with death) that they were overcome no less by their nature +than by their number. Among such features was the bearing +of arms prohibited under capital penalty, the death of Pietro +and Violante who were not accomplices in the flight of Pompilia, +the murder while a lawsuit was pending, and in their own home, +which place the authorities had with the consent of Guido +assigned to Pompilia as a secure prison. The many other +weighty charges which displayed the great learning of the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">279</a></span> +defenders were the just cause of the death of the accused. Yet +with the usual hope of all those who make confession of capital +crime, Guido flattered himself that he could save his life by +reason of his honour. At the unexpected announcement he +did not give up to such a frenzy as frequently follows in those +who experience so terrible a disaster, but, as if stupefied, after +a few minutes he heaved a deep sigh, accompanied by a few +tears, which by their extraordinary size showed dying symptoms. +He said: "I well feared a heavy sentence, but not that of +death. My crime is great, but love of honour has never +suffered me to perceive what it was until now that sentence has +been passed, which I hold in such reverence that I wish to +appeal only to God, to whom alone I turn for the only mercy. +Without His will I should never have reached this awful pass, +which may be a comfort to me and not a source of bitterness, +that I may gain by entire resignation to His will the merit of +His pardon." And then he threw himself into the arms of the +compassionate Frati and showed such signs of true contrition +that their prayers were accompanied by tears rather than by +exhortations.</p> + +<p>His four accomplices did not submit themselves with the same +readiness, for as they were of lower birth so were they less +swayed by reason, which would render them impressible to the +punishment they had merited. The oldest [Baldeschi] and +youngest [Agostinelli] were the most obstinate, the one from +having a heart hardened by so many years of evil life, and the +other being all too sensitive to so harsh a punishment for a +single crime, in the very flower of his youth, without ever having +spilled a drop of blood, and with the sole fault of having been +induced to stand as guard at a door through which Guido had +had to pass, to purge himself of the stains to his honour by the +blood of his foes. As the hour of execution drew nearer, the +stubbornness of these wretches so increased that the Frati +despaired of their repentance. At last the Divine Mercy, which +works miracles when we least expect it, entered their hearts +and gloriously demonstrated His omnipotence. They finally +trusted in God, and the memory of those faults which had made +them obstinate, and which were now illuminated by the Divine +Grace that disposed them to penitence, fitted them for pardon. +When these souls had been secured for God after such a hard +contest, the execution passed from the New Prisons at Tor di +Nonna to the scaffold raised in the Piazza del Popolo in view +of the gate and of the Corso. In the midst was the block on a +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">280</a></span> +lofty scaffold, larger than usual and with steps made with +particular care; on the two sides the gallows were placed at +equal distances. In spite of the vastness of the Piazza, not a +single foot was left which had not been occupied by stands, +which were covered with tapestry and other ornaments forming +a theatre for festal celebrations rather than for a solemn tragedy.</p> + +<p>His four companions preceded Guido, each of them in a +separate cart, assisted by the devotion of the accustomed Frati +[The Brotherhood of Death], and followed by a countless concourse +of people praying for a blessed departure, which in view +of their contrite resignation seemed not at all doubtful and +even a certain hope. Rarely did Guido Franceschini turn his +eyes from the crucifix, except when nature, overwearied by the +steadfastness of his gaze, made him turn away his head but not +his heart, which had been wholly given to his Creator so that +none was left for himself.</p> + +<p>When he had reached the Piazza di Pasquino, and the cart +had stopped before the church of Agonizzanti, where on days of +public execution it is customary to offer the Sacrament to the +delinquents condemned to death and therewith to bless them, +Guido knelt and began to recite, in a voice quite audible to +bystanders, certain verses of the <i>Miserere</i>, and among them this, +"Hide thy face from my sins and blot out all mine iniquities." +He accompanied this with such signs of sorrow and penitence +that the people by their tears showed no less grief than the one +condemned.</p> + +<p>With equal devotion his companions received the same +blessing, but the behaviour of the youngest [Agostinelli] was +remarkable beyond belief, who beside himself with his love of +Heaven and of God, by his expressions which exceeded his own +capacity, confounded the wisdom of his pious assistants.</p> + +<p>Thence by the most densely populated streets they continued +the journey to the Piazza del Popolo, where they all died, +Guido last, with those acts of contrition which their preparation +had shown. As the youngest had displayed most blessed signs +during life, so it pleased God that he met his death likewise, +for at the moment the executioner did his work, he clasped +between his breast and his hands the image of that crucifix +whereby they had become certain of Divine Pardon. This +assured the people of his salvation as his untimely death had +aroused their pity.</p> + +<p>Rome has never seen an execution with a greater concourse of +people, nor does it remember a case on which there was such +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">281</a></span> +general talk as on this. Some defended the Comparini, because +they had suffered abuse, others the Franceschini as it was a +matter of honour. But, on looking at the matter dispassionately, +they were adjudged to be equally guilty, except that Pompilia, +who was entirely ignorant of the truth, was without blame; +for she had consented to the marriage at the command of her +mother without the knowledge of her father, and had fled from +her husband for fear of death with which he had often unjustly +threatened her.</p> + +<p>From trickery arose the union of these two houses, from the +Franceschini in frauds regarding property they did not possess, +from the Comparini by the pretended birth, or by this very +pretence if the birth were real. The trick arose from greed of +gain in Pietro to secure the trust moneys for himself, and in +the Franceschini to minister to their own ease; so all was done +contrary to laws both human and divine. Hence a bad beginning +was followed with a wretched ending, as has been told +above.</p> + +<p class="p6 b1 center">NOTES AND COMMENT</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">283</a></span></p> + +<p><a name="note1" id="note1">1.</a> <i>Title-page</i> (p. 1). The manuscript title-page of the <i>Book</i> is closely +paraphrased by Browning, <i>R.B.</i> 1. 122-31, the word "position" being +used as the equivalent of Italian <i>posizione</i>.</p> + +<p><a name="note2" id="note2">2.</a> <i>The Index</i> (p. 3) (Italian, <i>indice</i>) is a manuscript table of contents, +evidently supplied by the original collector.</p> + +<p><a name="note3" id="note3">3.</a> <i>A Transcript of the sentence against Pompilia</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>-<a href="#Page_7">7</a>) in the Criminal +Courts of Arezzo, dated February 15, 1697 (for 1698). Parallel with the +Process of Flight (<i>see</i> <a href="#note18">Note 18</a>) in Rome, the Franceschini family evidently +instituted criminal proceedings in Arezzo against the fugitive Pompilia, +charging her with theft and adultery. Signor Guillichini and the driver +Borsi were included in the action as accessory to the crime. The Franceschini +were able to secure the condemnation here which was not obtainable +in Rome. Under security of this sentence, granted in December 1697, +Guido could safely go on with the assassination of his wife, so far as Tuscan +law was concerned. The transcript in the <i>Book</i> is dated February 15, +while the murder trial was at a crisis, and was probably sent to Rome +by Signor Cencini to assist Guido in his peril. It is noteworthy that +Guido did not include Caponsacchi in his accusation in Arezzo.</p> + +<p><a name="note4" id="note4">4.</a> <i>Romana Homicidiorum.</i> The frequently repeated designation of the +case—<i>Romana causa homicidiorum</i>—Roman trial for murders.</p> + +<p><a name="note5" id="note5">5.</a> <i>Hyacinthus de Archangelis</i> (Italian, <i>Giacinto Arcangeli</i>), <i>Procurator +Pauperum</i>, was Guido's chief defender, not an attorney employed privately +by the defendant, but an official States' attorney for the defence. The +Roman court procedure in all cases assumed the right and obligation of +the State to conduct both sides of a criminal case.</p> + +<p><a name="note6" id="note6">6.</a> <i>Desiderius Spretus, Advocatus Pauperum</i>, was the co-defender of the +accused. Humphrey's <i>Urbs et Orbis</i>, p. 428, makes plain the respective +functions of the two attorneys: "The advocate is a man skilled in civil +and canon law, who defends causes in writing or by word of mouth, on +the point of law, setting before the judges that which is true in law, or +best founded in law, or the principles of law which ought to be applied in +a particular case. His is the scientific part of the cause, and he speaks +only to the point of law. Matters of fact are to be established by the +procurators, and it is upon these established facts that the advocate +develops his judicial conclusions."</p> + +<p><a name="note7" id="note7">7.</a> <i>Joannes Baptista Bottinius, Fisci et Cam. Apost. Advoc.</i> (Advocate of +the Fisc, or Treasury, and of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber), the chief +prosecutor of the criminals, with functions equivalent to those of the +prosecuting or States Attorney in the Common Law. Browning continually +used the clipt form, Fisc.</p> + +<p><a name="note8" id="note8">8.</a> <i>Franciscus de Gambis, Procurator Fisci</i>, was the coadjutor in the +prosecution, opening the case in <a href="#pamphlet5">Pamphlet 5</a>, but thereafter playing little +part in the case.</p> + +<p><a name="note9" id="note9">9.</a> <i>Antonius Lamparellus, Procurator Charitatis</i>, the attorney who, in +<a href="#pamphlet17">Pamphlet 17</a>, defended the memory of the dead Pompilia for her heir +and against both the Franceschini family and the Nunnery of Convertites +(<i>see</i> <a href="#note10">Note 10</a>), both of whom were accusing her memory to gain her estate. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">284</a></span> +This trial in the criminal court of the Governor, took place between the +death of Guido, February 22, and May 17, 1698. The decision "for +absolution" was made <i>definitive</i> by the decree of court, September 9, 1698 +(<a href="#pamphlet18">Pamphlet 18</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="note10" id="note10">10.</a> <i>The Nunnery of the Convertites.</i> Within a month after the death of +Pompilia the Nunnery of <i>Sta. Maria Maddalena delle Convertite al Corso</i> +(founded 1520 <i>pro mulieribus ab inhonesta vita ad honestam se convertentibus</i>) +laid claim to the whole of Pompilia's property on the ground of their +privilege of receiving the property of women of evil life who died in Rome.</p> + +<p><a name="note11" id="note11">11.</a> <i>Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Lord Governor.</i> All the arguments +and the summaries of evidence in the murder case are addressed to +the Governor of Rome, but the Vice-Governor, Judge Venturini, seems to +have presided in his stead.</p> + +<p><a name="note12" id="note12">12.</a> The title and imprint on the right half of the final page of each of +these official pamphlets was evidently for convenience in filing the +documents when folded into bundles. The imprint <i>Typis Rev. Cam. +Apost.</i> (Type of the Reverend Apostolic Chamber), is the official imprint +of the Papal press.</p> + +<p><a name="note13" id="note13">13.</a> <i>The Deposition of Angelica</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_49">49</a>-<a href="#Page_53">53</a>). Angelica, a domestic in the +Franceschini home during January 1697, while the Comparini were living +in Arezzo with their son-in-law, was probably carried back to Rome by +the Comparini on their return to Rome that she might serve as a witness +to the poverty and parsimony of Guido. She makes her affidavit at +Rome, June 24, 1694, evidently for use in the suit brought by Comparini +to recover the dowry paid with Pompilia. How far it is true and how far +it is the prejudiced and bitter word of a resentful servant who had been +kicked out of doors, we cannot say. But its publication through court +procedure must have been bitterly humiliating to the Franceschini. What +was worse, the Comparini probably used this as a part of the slanderous +stories they took pains to print and circulate in Rome (p. <a href="#Page_181">181</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="note14" id="note14">14.</a> <i>Diverse Attestations</i> (p. <a href="#Page_53">53</a>). These attestations, made June 17, 1697, +nearly seven weeks after the arrest of Pompilia at Castelnuovo, were +evidently secured by her lawyers for her defence in the Process of Flight +(<a href="#note18">Note 18</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="note15" id="note15">15.</a> <i>The letters of Signori Romani and Albergotti</i> are undated, but were +probably written soon after the departure of the Comparini from Arezzo +in 1694.</p> + +<p><a name="note16" id="note16">16.</a> <i>Pompilia's Letter to Abate Paolo</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_56">56</a>-<a href="#Page_57">7</a>). The much discussed +letter of Pompilia to Abate Paolo, dated June 14, 1694, full of calumniation +of her parents, who had left Arezzo only three months before, could +not have been written by the fourteen-year-old girl voluntarily. Guido +must have composed it as a counter attack on the Comparini, who were +bringing suit against him at Rome, and were loading him with shame.</p> + +<p><a name="note17" id="note17">17</a>. <i>The Attestations of Fra Celestino and Others</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_57">57</a>-<a href="#Page_60">60</a>), dated January +10, only four days after the death of Pompilia, was given at the instance +of Pompilia's executor, Tighetti. It is a most important piece of evidence, +and is cited repeatedly during the trial. Its genuineness and sincerity +are beyond question, and Browning gained from it most of his faith in +the innocence and saintly patience of Pompilia.</p> + +<p><a name="note18" id="note18">18</a>. <i>Process of Flight.</i> After the arrest of Pompilia and Caponsacchi at +Castelnuovo they were taken to Rome and lodged in prison. They were +soon brought to trial on the criminal charge of adulterous elopement. +The case seems to have been in the same court which tried Guido for +murder eight months later, and probably continued in a desultory fashion +all summer. In this case both of the accused made the deposition later +included in the <i>Book</i>. In this trial also, Guido tried to introduce the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">285</a></span> +testimony of the harlot-servant, Maria Margherita, and the love-letters. +The case was never decided so far as Pompilia was concerned.</p> + +<p><a name="note19" id="note19">19</a>. <i>The Deposition of Pompilia</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_90">90</a>-<a href="#Page_95">5</a>), dated May 13, 1697, two +weeks after her arrest at Castelnuovo, giving the causes of her flight from +her husband's home, was made by Pompilia for her own defence in the +Process of Flight. The marginal comments, adverse to her, are, of course, +the prejudiced comments of Guido's lawyers.</p> + +<p><a name="note20" id="note20">20</a>. <i>The Deposition of Caponsacchi</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_95">95</a>-<a href="#Page_98">8</a>), made about the same +time and under the same circumstances for the Process of Flight, was +reintroduced as evidence in the murder case, but there is no reason to +think that Caponsacchi was brought into the latter case in any other way.</p> + +<p><a name="note21" id="note21">21</a>. <i>The Love-Letters</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_99">99</a>-<a href="#Page_106">106</a>). These letters are one of the most +elaborately discussed pieces of evidence in the <i>Book</i>. Guido claimed to +have found them at the inn of Castelnuovo after the arrest of the fugitives, +and he offered them in court during the Process of Flight, as a proof of +adultery in his wife, but they were thrown out by the court. Their +conventional fine-letter-writing, their studied innuendo and finesse, were +quite beyond the capacity of an illiterate girl like Pompilia. They were +probably composed by Guido, and if so, they prove that he was basely +scheming to drive his wife into dishonourable flight that he might disgrace +her and cast her off. The eighteenth letter was specifically denied +by Caponsacchi in his cross-examination.</p> + +<p><a name="note22" id="note22">22</a>. <i>The Sentence of Relegation</i> (p. <a href="#Page_106">106</a>) for three years in Civita Vecchia +was decreed against Caponsacchi at the close of the Process of Flight in +September, 1697. It is commensurate with priestly indiscretion rather +than with crime.</p> + +<p><a name="note23" id="note23">23</a>. <i>The Account of Fact</i> (<a href="#pamphlet10">Pamphlet 10</a>). This anonymous Italian +pamphlet is not at all a part of the official record of the murder case. It +has no imprint and is in entirely different face of type, and must have been +printed privately for circulation outside the courts. While much less +technical and formal than the arguments of the lawyers, and much more +studious of popular effects, it slips back repeatedly into the thought and +the language of Arcangeli, the defender of Guido. It probably suggested +Half-Rome in <i>The Ring and the Book</i>.</p> + +<p><a name="note24" id="note24">24</a>. <i>The Response</i> (<a href="#pamphlet15">Pamphlet 15)</a> is a highly rhetorical, but effective, +retort to the anonymous writer. It was written during the later stage +of the murder trial, and was probably the work of Signor Bottini. It +likewise is without imprint and signature, but may have been broadly +scattered throughout Rome.</p> + +<p><a name="note25" id="note25">25</a>. "<i>To keep to this home of Pietro ... as a prison</i>," <i>Domus pro Carcere</i> +(p. <a href="#Page_159">159</a>). For a month after the sentence against Caponsacchi, Pompilia +was kept prisoner in the refuge called the <i>Scalette</i>—a provision for her +safekeeping, not a punishment. On October 12, she was permitted to +give bond to keep the home of her foster parents, the Comparini, as a +prison, <i>Domus pro carcere</i>, sentence against her being suspended.</p> + +<p><a name="note26" id="note26">26</a>. <i>The Scalette.</i> The <i>Conservatorio di S. Croce della Penitenza alla +Lungara</i> was an institution for penitent women, founded 1615, and +popularly called <i>Scalette</i>, because of the two adjoining stairways. +Browning confuses this institution with the Convertites (<a href="#note10">Note 10</a>).</p> + +<p><a name="note27" id="note27">27</a>. <i>Baptismal Record of Pompilia</i> (p. <a href="#Page_159">159</a>). This note, taken from the +parish record of San Lorenzo, in Lucina, enables Browning to make the +exact statement of Pompilia's age and her full name, as given in the +opening lines of her monologue.</p> + +<p><a name="note28" id="note28">28</a>. <i>Pompilia's Letter</i> (p. <a href="#Page_160">160</a>) to her foster parents, written from +prison at Castelnuovo only two days after her arrest, is her plea to them +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">286</a></span> +for assistance. It was probably cited as evidence in the Process of +Flight.</p> + +<p><a name="note29" id="note29">29</a>. <i>The Will of Pietro Comparini</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_160">160</a>-<a href="#Page_161">1</a>), evidently drawn up after +he had learned Pompilia was not his own daughter, and before her return +to Rome, aimed to prevent her being disinherited for that reason. Its +personal tone is good, and it is almost the only first-hand evidence of the +character of Pietro to be found in the <i>Book</i>.</p> + +<p><a name="note30" id="note30">30</a>. <i>Power of Attorney</i> (p. <a href="#Page_162">162</a>). Under date of October 7, 1694, Guido +grants full power of attorney to Abate Paolo, who was representing him +in the lawsuits in Rome and in other matters of business.</p> + +<p><a name="note31" id="note31">31</a>. <i>Arcangeli's Manuscript Letter</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_235">235</a>-<a href="#Page_236">6</a>). On February 22, 1698, only +a few hours after the execution of Guido, Signor Arcangeli, his legal +defender, announces the end of the case to Signor Cencini, the Florentine +lawyer who collected the <i>Book</i>, and who seems to have been professionally +related to the Franceschini family, as he had sent certain "proofs" to +assist the cause of Guido, probably including the report of the criminal +condemnation of Pompilia in the Tuscan courts. (<i>See</i> <a href="#note3">Note 3</a>). This +letter is reproduced by Browning, <i>R. B.</i> XII. 239-98.</p> + +<p><a name="note32" id="note32">32</a>. <i>The Other Letters</i> (pp. <a href="#Page_237">237</a>-<a href="#Page_238">8</a>), written on the same day and to +Signor Cencini, give a few additional details. The writers seem to have +been professionally associated with the Franceschini family.</p> + +<p><a name="note33" id="note33">33</a>. <i>Francesca Pompilia</i>, foster daughter of the Comparini, <i>b.</i> July 17, +1680; was married to Guido Franceschini, December 1693; fled from her +husband's home in Arezzo, April 29, 1697; arrested at Castelnuovo, May 1; +wrote to her foster parents from her prison at Castelnuovo, May 3; made +deposition in Rome concerning her flight, May 13; was on trial for flight +and adultery during the summer of 1697; was placed in the convent of the +<i>Scalette</i>, September 1697; removed to the home of the Comparini as prison, +October 12, 1697; gave birth to a son, Gaetano, December 18, 1697; was +assassinated January 2, 1698; died January 6.</p> + +<p><a name="note34" id="note34">34</a>. <i>Giuseppe Maria Caponsacchi</i>, <i>b.</i> May 26, 1673, was invested Canon +of the Church of Santa Maria della Pieve, November 26, 1693, and resigned +"of his own accord," May 15, 1702. He is referred to in the <i>Book</i> +as a man of courage, and his words as he faced Guido at Castelnuovo are +significant: "I am a man, and have done what I have that I might save +your wife from death." His affidavit is convincingly straightforward, in +spite of certain discrepancies with Pompilia's statements, and there is +evident moral indignation in his replies under cross-examination. His +participation in the dangerous flight in mere amorous intrigue seems +unbelievably foolish, and could hardly have been carried through save on +the motive he assigns, courageous "Christian compassion." In September +1697 he went to Civita Vecchia under sentence of three years' relegation.</p> + +<p><a name="note35" id="note35">35</a>. <i>Canon Conti</i>, called the "mediator in the flight," was brother of +Count Aldobrandini, who had married Guido's sister, and Conti is accordingly +spoken of as a "relative and frequenter of the Franceschini home." +He had been invested Canon of the Pieve, August 14, 1692. He must +have been fully informed of Pompilia's sufferings, and to him she turned +at last for help. Deeming it improper for himself to afford her relief, he +urged his friend Caponsacchi to accompany her. No criminal procedure +was instituted against him in Arezzo when Pompilia and Guillichini were +accused. He died January 1698, and the Second Anonymous Pamphleteer +hints that this was due to foul play.</p> + +<p><a name="note36" id="note36">36</a>. <i>Guido Franceschini</i>, <i>b.</i> January 24, 1658, the youngest son of an +impoverished, second-rate, noble family of Arezzo, had sought his fortunes +in Rome, where he became secretary of Cardinal Nerli. He dropped out +of this service in middle life, with hardly a dollar in his pocket, and planned +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">287</a></span> +to recoup his fortunes by marriage with Pompilia, the heiress of the well-to-do +Comparini. After the marriage in December 1693, the Comparini +accompanied him back to Arezzo. He seems to have been unattractive +and saturnine, and later on proved himself both crafty and brutal.</p> + +<p><a name="note37" id="note37">37</a>. <i>Abate Paolo Franceschini</i>, <i>b.</i> October 28, 1650, the older, shrewder, +and more able brother of Guido, was more successful in seeking his fortunes +in the official world of Rome. He became secretary of the powerful +Cardinal Lauria, and on the death of the latter, November 30, 1693, +obtained the lucrative office of Secretary of the Order of St. John of Malta. +He assisted Guido in effecting the marriage with Pompilia, and was his +active agent in Rome during the lawsuits which followed. In 1697 he +lost his secretaryship because of the ignominy which had come upon him +in Guido's shameful troubles, and left Rome, possibly, as he is accused by +the Second Anonymous Pamphleteer, to assist in planning the murder of +the Comparini.</p> + +<p><a name="note38" id="note38">38</a>. <i>Honoris Causa.</i> As the fact of the murders by Guido and his +cut-throats was subject to no dispute, the whole law case turns on the +question whether these murders had been <i>for the sake of honour</i>, the ever +repeated plea of the unwritten law for the right of the husband to slay a +wife sinning against her wifehood. The lawyer's devote themselves to +ascertaining the limitations and privileges of this plea.</p> + +<p><a name="note39" id="note39">39</a>. <i>Incontinenti, Ex Intervallo.</i> There is much argument on the +justification for honour's sake in murder done <i>immediately</i> after the insult, +or <i>after an interval</i> of time has elapsed. In the latter case, the murder +becomes premeditated, and is not justifiable on the ground of excusable +heat of passion at an insult.</p> + +<p><a name="note40" id="note40">40</a>. <i>The Aggravating Circumstances.</i> The prosecution makes much of +the attendant criminal circumstances which surrounded the main crime +of murder. These are first, the assembling of a band of armed men, +constituting the crime of rebellion; second, the murder of a prisoner +while under the care of the courts, Pompilia being technically a prisoner +detained in the Process of Flight; third, the assault upon opponents in a +pending lawsuit, the Comparini then being at law with Guido; fourth, +the violent breaking into a private home; fifth, the commission of crime +under cover of disguise; sixth, the use of certain types of barbarous +weapon, the very possession of which was a capital offence. The first +three of these were <i>laesa majestas</i>, criminal insult to the majesty of the +law.</p> + +<p><a name="note41" id="note41">41</a>. <i>San Lorenzo in Lucina.</i> This church in the heart of Rome just off +the Corso, and not very far from the home of the Comparini at the corner +of Via Vittoria, and Strada Paolina, was evidently the parish church of the +Comparini, as both the birth and death of Pompilia are entered in its +register.</p> + +<p><a name="note42" id="note42">42</a>. <i>Castelnuovo.</i> A village of but a few houses, fifteen miles north of +Rome. The inn and posthouse where Pompilia and Caponsacchi were +overtaken by Guido thus became one of the most important scenes in +the tragedy.</p> + +<p><a name="note43" id="note43">43</a>. <i>Torture of the Vigil.</i> Guido and his companions were tortured +thus, to get fuller testimony from them. This torture consisted originally +in merely keeping the victim awake until he told his crime. Later on his +confession was accelerated by auxiliary devices for intensifying the suffering +of the subject.</p> + +<p><a name="note44" id="note44">44</a>. Browning has taken the peroration used in the first lawyer's +monologue, <i>R. B.</i> VIII. 1637-1736, directly from the peroration of Arcangeli +in <a href="#pamphlet8">Pamphlet 8</a>, p. <a href="#Page_130">130</a>. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">288</a></span></p> + +<p><a name="note45" id="note45">45</a>. The description of the execution as given in <i>R. B.</i> XII. 113 <i>et seq.</i>, +is taken from the additional Italian pamphlet, pp. <a href="#Page_265">265</a>-<a href="#Page_266">6</a>.</p> + +<p><a name="note46" id="note46">46</a>. In like manner <i>R. B.</i> VIII. 587-683, is closely drawn from the <i>Book</i>, +pp. <a href="#Page_153">153</a>-<a href="#Page_154">4</a>, with an interpolation in lines 640-57 from page <a href="#Page_226">226</a>. More than +fifty of such word to word borrowings from the <i>Book</i> are made in this +monologue.</p> + +<p class="center p2"><span class="smcap">Minute of the Definite Order of Events in the Case</span></p> + +<p> +July 17, 1680. Pompilia born. (<a href="#note27">Note 27</a>).</p> + +<p>December (?) 1693. Pompilia married to Guido Franceschini.</p> + +<p>December 1693. The Comparini accompany the bride to Arezzo.</p> + +<p>Four months residence together in Arezzo.</p> + +<p>Domestic broils in Arezzo, January and February, 1694.</p> + +<p>March 1694. The Comparini return to Rome.</p> + +<p>April or May 1694. Violante reveals base parentage of Pompilia.</p> + +<p>June 14, 1694. Pompilia's letter to Abate Paolo. (<a href="#note16">Note 16</a>).</p> + +<p>June 24, 1694. Affidavit of Angelica. (<a href="#note13">Note 13</a>).</p> + +<p>Summer of 1694. Pietro Comparini prosecutes suit to recover dowry.</p> + +<p>August 2, 1694. Letter of the Governor to Abate Paolo.</p> + +<p>September 15, 1694. Letter of the Bishop of Arezzo to Abate Paolo.</p> + +<p>March 1697. Pompilia seeks aid of Confessor Romano.</p> + +<p>April, 1697. Seeks aid of Guillichini, Conti, and Caponsacchi.</p> + +<p>April 29 (1 a.m.). Pompilia flees.</p> + +<p>April 30 (in the evening). Fugitives arrive at Castelnuovo.</p> + +<p>May 1 (early in the morning). Guido overtakes fugitives and has them +arrested.</p> + +<p>May 3. Pompilia writes from the prison of Castelnuovo.</p> + +<p>May 13. Pompilia makes her deposition. (<a href="#note19">Note 19</a>).</p> + +<p>May 21. Pompilia is further cross-examined.</p> + +<p>June 17, 1697. Certain persons in Arezzo make affidavit in Pompilia's +behalf. (<a href="#note14">Note 14</a>).</p> + +<p>Summer of 1697. The Process of Flight. (<a href="#note18">Note 18</a>).</p> + +<p>September 24, 1697. Caponsacchi sentenced to relegation. (<a href="#note22">Note 22</a>).</p> + +<p>October 12. Pompilia permitted to return home under bond. (<a href="#note25">Note 25</a>).</p> + +<p>Fall of 1697. Pompilia institutes suit for divorce.</p> + +<p>Fall of 1697. The Franceschini push a criminal suit against Pompilia in +the criminal courts of Arezzo. (<a href="#note3">Note 3</a>).</p> + +<p>Fall of 1697. Abate Paolo loses his secretaryship of the Order of St. John.</p> + +<p>December 18, 1697. Pompilia gives birth to a son.</p> + +<p>December 24, 1697. Guido and his cut-throats arrive in Rome.</p> + +<p>January 2, 1698. Guido murders his wife and the Comparini.</p> + +<p>January 3. Guido and his associates arrested and imprisoned.</p> + +<p>January 6. Pompilia dies.</p> + +<p>January 19. Fra Celestino makes affidavit. (<a href="#note17">Note 17</a>).</p> + +<p>January 1698. The murder trial begins.</p> + +<p>January 1698. Conti dies in Arezzo.</p> + +<p>January 1698. Sta. Maria Maddalena delle Convertite institutes suit to +gain Pompilia's estate. (<a href="#note10">Note 10</a>).</p> + +<p>End of January. The torture of the Vigil. (<a href="#note43">Note 43</a>).</p> + +<p>February 1698. The second stage of the murder trial.</p> + +<p>February 9. Certificate of the baptismal record of Pompilia obtained. +(<a href="#note27">Note 27</a>).</p> + +<p>February 15. Certificate of the Tuscan criminal prosecution of Pompilia +obtained. (<a href="#note3">Note 3</a>).</p> + +<p>February 18. Guido declared guilty, but a stay of sentence granted.</p> + +<p>February 21. Execution set for following day. The Pope overrules delay.</p> + +<p>February 22, 1698. The murderers are executed.</p> + +<p>Spring of 1698. The Franceschini bring suit to recover Pompilia's property. +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">289</a></span></p> + +<p>May 17. The criminal court decides in favour of Pompilia's executor.</p> + +<p>September 1-9, 1698. Final decree of court, utterly clearing Pompilia's +reputation.</p> + +<p class="p2">Browning uses all the above chronology with scrupulous accuracy, save +when, for good artistic reasons, he changes the flight from April 29 to the +23rd, St. George's day.</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="smcap">Minute of the Personal Names found in the Book and Pamphlet<br /> +and used by Browning in His Poem</span></p> +<table summary="Personal Names"> +<tr><td colspan="3">Franceschini, Signor Guido. (<a href="#note36">Note 36</a>).</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Franceschini, Abate Paolo. (<a href="#note37">Note 37</a>).</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Franceschini, Canon Girolamo, <i>b.</i> August 5, 1654, brother of Guido.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Franceschini, Donna Beatrice, 1631-1701, mother of Guido.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Franceschini, Count Tommaso, father of Guido.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Comparini, Signor Pietro, father of Pompilia.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Comparini, Violante, mother of Pompilia.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Comparini, Pompilia. (<a href="#note33">Note 33</a>).</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Canon Conti. (<a href="#note35">Note 35</a>).</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Canon Giuseppe Caponsacchi. (<a href="#note34">Note 34</a>).</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Signor Guillichini, helper in the flight.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Borsi, the driver.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Signor Marzi-Medici, Governor of Arezzo.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Bishop of Arezzo, Giovanni Matteo Marchetti, 1691-1704.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">The Confessor Romano.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Maria Margherita Contenti, servant in the Franceschini home.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Monna Baldi (Albergotti).</td></tr> + +<tr> +<td>Cardinal Panciatichi</td> +<td rowspan="2"><span class="bracket2">}</span></td> +<td rowspan="2">Guido's confessors on the eve of execution.</td> +</tr> +<tr> +<td>Cardinal Acciajuoli</td> +</tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Signor Tighetti, trustee of Pompilia's estate.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">The babe, Gaetano.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Fra Celestino, confessor of the dying Pompilia.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Signor Giacinto Arcangeli. (<a href="#note5">Note 5</a>).</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Signor Bottini. (<a href="#note7">Note 7</a>).</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Signor Spreti. (<a href="#note6">Note 6</a>).</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Signor Cencini, a Florentine lawyer interested in the murder trials.</td></tr> +<tr> +<td class="tdl">Alessandro Baldeschi</td> +<td rowspan="4"><span class="bracket4">}</span></td> +<td rowspan="4">The assassins.</td> +</tr> +<tr> +<td class="tdl">Domenico Gambassini</td> +</tr> +<tr> +<td class="tdl">Francesco Pasquini</td> +</tr> +<tr> +<td class="tdl">Biagio Agostinelli</td> +</tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Curate Ottoboni, Curate at San Lorenzo, in Lucina.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Judge Tommati, Auditor Curiae.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Judge Molines, of the Ruota.</td></tr> + +<tr><td colspan="3">Marco Antonio Venturini, Vice-Governor, presiding in the murder case.</td></tr> +</table> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Old Yellow Book, by Anonymous + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE OLD YELLOW BOOK *** + +***** This file should be named 38238-h.htm or 38238-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/8/2/3/38238/ + +Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Melissa McDaniel and the +Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/38238-h/images/005.jpg b/38238-h/images/005.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..672e25b --- /dev/null +++ b/38238-h/images/005.jpg diff --git a/38238-h/images/006.jpg b/38238-h/images/006.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..423cdb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/38238-h/images/006.jpg diff --git a/38238-h/images/fax.jpg b/38238-h/images/fax.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..529b8e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/38238-h/images/fax.jpg diff --git a/38238-h/images/logom.jpg b/38238-h/images/logom.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3beaef6 --- /dev/null +++ b/38238-h/images/logom.jpg diff --git a/38238-h/images/sign.jpg b/38238-h/images/sign.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a83f2f --- /dev/null +++ b/38238-h/images/sign.jpg |
