diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:09:31 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:09:31 -0700 |
| commit | ec53715b8dd076e2fd43a6d4c74281e8d001983c (patch) | |
| tree | 67bc6c710242e6a98f9d5fb373908e8b789e17ae /38102.txt | |
Diffstat (limited to '38102.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | 38102.txt | 3391 |
1 files changed, 3391 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/38102.txt b/38102.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7e6e862 --- /dev/null +++ b/38102.txt @@ -0,0 +1,3391 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Critical Examination of the Life of St. Paul, by +Boulanger + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Critical Examination of the Life of St. Paul + +Author: Boulanger + +Release Date: November 22, 2011 [EBook #38102] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EXAMINATION OF THE LIFE OF ST. PAUL *** + + + + +Produced by David Widger + + + + + + +CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE LIFE OF ST. PAUL + +By Boulanger + +Translated From The French Of Boulanger + +"Paul, thou art beside thyself, much learning doth make thee mad." + +Acts, chap. 26, ver. 24. + +1823 + +INTRODUCTION. + +EPISTLE DEDICATORY TO M. L. N. + +Sir, In our last conversation you appeared to me, very much smitten with +St. Paul and his works; you recommended me to reperuse his writings; +assuring me that I should there find arguments well calculated to shake +incredulity and confirm a Christian in his faith. + +Although the actions of this celebrated Apostle, related in the Acts, +and his doctrine contained in his Epistles, were already perfectly known +to me, yet to conform myself to your desires, and give you proofs of +my docility, I have again read those works, and I can assure you that +I have done it with the greatest attention. You will judge of that +yourself, by the reflections I send you; they will at least prove to you +that I have read with attention. A superficial glance is only likely to +deceive us or leave us in error. The passions and the prejudices of men +prevent them from examining with candour, and from their indolence they +are often disgusted with the researches necessary for discovering truth; +that has also been with so much care veiled from their eyes: but it is +in vain to cover it, its splendour will sooner or later shine forth; +the works of enthusiasm or imposture, will always end by betraying +themselves. As for the rest, read and judge. You will find, I think, at +least, some reasons for abating a little from that high opinion, that +prejudice gives us of the Apostle of the Gentiles, and of the religious +system of the Christians, of which St. Paul was evidently the true +architect. I am not ignorant that it is very difficult to undo at +one blow the ideas to which the mind has been so long accustomed; +but whatever may be your judgment it will not alter the sentiments of +friendship and attachment which are due to the goodness of your heart. + +I am, &c, &c. + + + + +CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE LIFE OF ST. PAUL + + + + +CHAPTER I. Is the Conversion of St. Paul a proof in favour of the +Christian Religion? + +Many theologians would make us regard the miraculous conversion and +apostleship of St. Paul as one of the strongest proofs of the truth of +Christianity. But in viewing the thing closely it appears that this +conversion, far from proving any thing in favour of this religion, +invalidates the other proofs of it, in fact, our doctors continually +assure us that the Christian religion draws its strongest proofs from +the prophecies of the Old Testament, whilst there is not in fact a +single one of these prophecies that can be literally applied to the +Messiah of the Christians. St. Paul himself willing to make use of these +oracles of the Jewish nation to prove the mission of Christ, is obliged +to distort them, and to seek in them a mystical, allegorical, and +figurative sense. On the other side, how can these prophecies made by +Jews and addressed to Jews, serve as proofs of the doctrine of St. +Paul, who had evidently formed the design of altering, or even of +destroying, the Jewish religion, in order to raise a new system on its +ruins? Such being the state of things, what real connection, or what +relation, can there be between the religious system of the Jews, and +that of St. Paul? For this Apostle to have had the right of making use of +the Jewish prophecies, it would have been necessary that he should have +remained a Jew; his conversion to Christianity evidently deprived him of +the privilege of serving himself, by having recourse to the prophecies +belonging to a religion that he had just abandoned, and the ruin of +which he meditated. True prophecies can only be found in a divine +religion, and a religion truly divine, can neither be altered, reformed, +nor destroyed: God himself, if he is immutable, could not change it. + +In fact, might not the Jews have said to St. Paul, "Apostate that you +are! you believe in our prophecies, and you come to destroy the religion +founded upon the same prophecies. If you believe in our oracles, you +are forced to believe that the religion which you have quitted is a true +religion and divinely inspired. If you say, that God has changed his +mind, you are impious in pretending that God could change, and was not +sufficiently wise, to give at once to his people a perfect worship, and +one which had no need of being reformed. On the other side, do not the +reiterated promises of the Most High, confirmed by paths to our fathers, +assure us, that his alliance with us should endure eternally? You are +then an impostor, and, according to our law, we ought to exterminate +you; seeing that Moses, our divine legislator, orders us to put to +death, whoever shall have the temerity to preach to us a new worship, +even though he should confirm his mission by prodigies. The God that you +preach is not the God of our fathers: you say that Christ is his son; +but we know that God has no son. You pretend that this son, whom we have +put to death as a false prophet, has risen from the dead, but Moses has +not spoken of the resurrection; thus your new God and your dogmas +are contrary to our law, and consequently we ought to hold them in +abhorrence." In short these same Jews might have said to St. Paul: "You +deceive yourself in saying, that you are the disciple of Jesus, your +Jesus was a Jew, during the whole of his life he was circumcised, he +conformed himself to all the legal ordinances; he often protested +that he came to accomplish, and not to abolish the law; whilst you in +contempt of the protestations of the Master, whose Apostle you say you +are, take the liberty of changing this holy law, of decrying it, of +dispensing with its most essential ordinances." + +Moreover the conversion of St. Paul strangely weakens the proof that +the Christian religion draws from the miracles of Jesus Christ and his +Apostles. According to the evangelists themselves the Jews were not +at all convinced by these miracles. The transcendant prodigy of the +resurrection of Christ, the wonders since wrought by some of his +adherents did not contribute more to their conversion. St. Paul believed +nothing of them at first, he was a zealous persecutor of the first +Christians to such a degree, that, according to the Christians, nothing +short of a new miracle, performed for him alone, was able to convert +him; which proves to us that there was, at least, a time when St. Paul +did not give any credit to the wonders that the partisans of Jesus +related at Jerusalem. + +He needed a particular miracle to believe in those miracles, that we +are obliged to believe in at the time in which we live, without heaven +operating any new prodigy to demonstrate to us the truth of them. + + + + +CHAPTER II. Opinions of the first Christians upon the Acts of the +Apostles, and upon the Epistles and Person of St. Paul. + +It is in the Acts of the Apostles, and the Epistles of St. Paul, that +we find the details of his life and the system of his doctrine; but, how +can we be certain of the authenticity of these works, whilst we see many +of the first Christians doubt and reject them as apocryphal? We find, +in fact, that from the earliest period of the church, entire sects of +Christians, who believed that many of the Epistles published under +the name of this Apostle, were not really his. The Marcionites were +confident that the gospels were filled with falshoods, and Marcion, +their head, pretended that his gospel was the only true one. + +The Manicheans, who formed a very numerous sect at the commencement of +Christianity, rejected as false, all the New Testament, and produced +other writings, quite different, which they gave as authentic. The +Corinthians, as well as the Marcionites, did not admit the Acts of the +Apostles. The Encratites and the Severians did not adopt either the Acts +or the Epistles of St. Paul. St. John Chrysostom in a homily, which he +has made upon the Acts, says, that in his time (that is to say, towards +the end of the fourth century) many men were ignorant not only of the +name of the author, or of the collector of these Acts, but even did +not know this work. The Valentinians, as well as many other sects +of Christians accused our scriptures of being filled with errors, +imperfections, and contradictions, and of being insufficient without the +assistance of traditions; this is a fact that is attested to us by St. +Irenaeus. The Ebionites or Nazarenes, who, as we shall soon see, were the +first Christians, rejected all the Epistles of St. Paul, and regarded +him as an impostor and hypocrite. + +It will not fail being said to us, that we ought not to rely on +the testimony of heretics; but I shall reply, that in the matter in +question, their testimony is of the same weight as that of the orthodox, +seeing that all the different sects consider themselves as orthodox, +and have treated their adversaries as heretics. How shall we unravel the +truth if we do not hear both parties? By what signs shall we know those +on whom we ought to rely? Shall we cede the cause without examining their +adversaries, to writers who utter to us falshoods without number, who +contradict each other, who are never agreed amongst themselves, and +whose discordant writings are nevertheless produced as proofs of what +they advance? In any other subject such a conduct would seem to betray a +partiality or even insincerity: but in religious matters, every thing is +fair, and there is no necessity of being so nice. + +However that may be, it does not follow that because one sect has +received or rejected a work, that the work itself is either true or +false; there cannot be otherwise than, a diversity of opinions between +persons of different parties; their testimony ought to have equal +weight, until the partisans of one sect, have been convicted of being +greater cheats and liars, than those of the other. If we pay no regard +to the authority of heretics, it is because they have not had sufficient +power to enforce their opinions. It is power or weakness which makes +orthodoxians or heretics: the last are always those who have not power +enough to make their opinions current. + +What course shall we then pursue to discover on which side is the truth? +An impartial man will no more expect to find it in one party than in +another, thus the testimony of the one can have no greater weight than +that of the other in the eye of an unprejudiced man. + +This granted, we cannot rely on the authority of Christian traditions +which vary in all sects, and we shall be reduced to recur solely +to reason, especially when we find that the works, which are to-day +regarded as authentic, have in other times been considered as +suppositious, or apocryphal, by some very ancient sects of Christians, +and that the works and writings, then regarded as apocryphal, have since +been adopted as true. + +It appears that in the ancient churches, they read at once the works +that we now regard as true, and those that now-pass for suppositious, +in such sort, that there is reason to believe they were then held to +possess equal claim to authenticity: it is, at least, very, difficult +to demonstrate the contrary in the present time. Some churches have +attributed the same authority to false or doubtful writings as to true. + +The Roman Church to-day adopts as authentic and divinely inspired many +books of the Bible, absolutely rejected by the Protestants. How is it +possible to decide which is the party that deceives itself? + +By what right can we then affirm to-day that the works of St. Paul, +formerly rejected by so many Christian sects, are authentic, that is +to say, truly belong to this Apostle? On the other hand, how can we +attribute to divine inspiration writings filled with inconsistencies, +contradictions, mistakes, and false reasonings, in a word, which bear +every character of delirium, of ignorance, and of fraud? I acknowledge +that those who want valid proofs, always do right to affirm the thing, +with the tone of authority; but this tone proves nothing, and always +prejudices against those who take it. Nothing is more injurious to the +interest of truth, than the arrogance of an usurped authority. These +are, however, the arms that are incessantly opposed to those who doubt +of religion. It would seem that its defenders have no other arguments +than their pretences; it is easy to feel that these arguments are every +thing, but convincing. + +The Acts of the Apostles, adopted by the Ebionites or Nazarenes, relate +amongst other things, that, "Paul was originally a Pagan, that he +came to Jerusalem where he dwelt for some time; that being desirous of +marrying the daughter of the High Priest he became a proselyte, and +was circumcised; but not being able to obtain the woman he desired, +he quarrelled with the Jews, began to write against the circumcision, +against the observation of the Sabbath, and against legal ordinances." + +We know that the name of Nazarenes was the first which was given to the +Christians. St. Epiphanius, from whom the preceding passage is taken, +says, "that they were thus named because of Jesus of Nazareth," of whom +they were the first disciples. The Jews called them Nazarenes from the +Hebrew word Nozerim, which signifies one separated or excommunicated; +again they designated them under the name of Mineans, that is to say, +heretics. They were also by contempt called Ebionites, which signifies +poor, mendicant, weak-minded. In fact, the Hebrew Ebion, means poor, +miserable, and we know, that the first followers of Christ, were every +thing but opulent or intelligent men. + +The first faithful, were Jews converted by Jesus himself, or by the most +ancient Apostles, such as Peter, James, and John, who as well as their +master, lived in Judaism. These Apostles, disciples, and new converts, +differed from the Jews in nothing but the belief in Jesus Christ, whom +they regarded as the Messiah predicted by the prophets; otherwise +they believed themselves bound constantly to observe the Mosaic law, +persuaded that their Messiah was come to accomplish and not to destroy +this law. In consequence of this, they observed circumcision, the +abstinence from certain meats, separation from the Gentiles, in a word, +the Jewish rites and ordinances. + +Thus the first Apostles, and their adherents, were only Jews, persuaded +that the Messiah was already come, and was going soon to commence his +reign, which made them hated and persecuted as schismatics or heretics +by their fellow-citizens. St. Jerome informs us, "that even down to his +time, the Jews used to anathematize the Christians, under the name of +Nazarenes, three times a day in their synagogues." + +All this evidently proves, that the Nazarenes, of Ebionites, were the +first Christians, taught by the most considerable of the Apostles, and +that the first Christians were only reformed Jews; this is clearly the +only idea we can form of Christianity, such as it was taught by Jesus +Christ himself. + +How then comes it that since Jesus, Christianity has been so separated +from Judaism? a slight attention will prove to us that this is owing to +St. Paul. Repulsed by the Jews, or perhaps desirous of playing a +more important part, we see him separate himself from his brethren of +Jerusalem, and undertake the conversion of the Gentiles, for whom +the Jews entertained no sentiment but horror. Encouraged by his first +successes and wishing to extend them, he dispensed the Pagans from the +painful ceremony of circumcision; he declared that the law of Moses, was +only a law of servitude, from which Jesus was come to free mankind; he +pretended that all the old law was merely the emblem and figure of the +new; he announced himself as the Apostle of the Gentiles, and leaving +Peter and the other Nazarenes to preach the gospel of circumcision, +he preached his own gospel, which he himself called the gospel of +uncircumcision: in a word, he made a divorce with the Jewish laws, to +which his apostolic brethren believed they ought to hold themselves +attached, at least, in most respects. + +The conduct of Paul, must naturally have displeased his seniors in the +Apostleship, but fear appears to have deter mined them to cede, at least +for a time, to our missionary who had already made a considerable party. +Nevertheless the Acts of the Apostles and the writings of Paul, prove to +us his quarrels with his brethren, who, according to appearances, never +viewed with a friendly eye, his enterprizes and innovations. Moreover, +Eusebius and St. Epiphanius inform us, that our Apostle was regarded as +an apostate, an impostor, and an enemy by the Ebionites, that is to say, +by the first faithful. But St. Paul's party having in the end prevailed, +the Jewish law was entirely banished from Christianity, and the +Ebionites, or Nazarenes, though of more ancient date and though formed +by Christ and his first apostles were declared heretics. + +It is proper to remark in this place that these Ebionites, or first +Christians, believed that Jesus was but a man, as much on the side of +his father as on that of his mother, that is to say, the son of Joseph +and Mary; but that he was a wise, just, and excellent person, thus +meriting the appellation of the son of God, because of his holy life and +good qualities whence we see that the first Christians were as well as +the first Apostles, true Socinians. But St. Paul to give, without doubt, +more lustre to his ministry, and his adherents after him, willing to +extol the holiness of their religion, made a God of Jesus, a dogma which +it is no more permitted to doubt, especially since the partizans of Paul +have become more numerous, and stronger than those of St. Peter and the +other Nazarenes, or Jewish founders of primitive Christianity, which +thus totally changed its face as to its capital dogmas. + +Having thus become masters of the field of battle, Paul, his adherents, +and the disciples formed in their school, saw themselves in possession +of the power of regulating belief, of inventing new dogmas, of making +gospels, and of arranging them in their own manner, of forging to +themselves titles, and of excommunicating as heretics all those who +showed themselves unteachable. It is thus that the author of the Acts of +the Apostles, only speaks, as it were, of his master, of St. Paul, and +glances very slightly over the Acts of the Apostles of the contrary +party. The same author (St. Luke) is presumed to have composed his +gospel from the notes furnished him by St. Paul, though he had neither +known nor seen Jesus Christ. + +Faustus, the Manichean, said on the subject of the gospels, "that +they had been composed a long time after the Apostles, by some obscure +individuals, who fearing that faith would not be given to histories of +facts with which they must have been unacquainted, published under the +name of the Apostles their own writings, so filled with mistakes and +discordant relations and opinions, that we can find in them neither +connection nor agreement with themselves." + +A little further on he loudly accuses his adversaries, who had +the credit of being orthodox, and says to them, "It is thus that +predecessors have inserted in the writings of our Lord many things +which, though they bear his name, do not # at all agree with his +doctrine. That is not surprising since we have often proved that these +things have not been written by himself nor by his Apostles, but that +for the greater part they are founded on tales, on vague reports, +and collected by I know not who, half Jews, but little agreed among +themselves, who have nevertheless published them under the name of our +Lord, and thus have attributed to him their own errors and deceptions." + +Origeo informs us, that Celsus exclaimed against the licence that the +Christians of his time, had taken of altering many times imprudently the +originals of their gospels, in order to be able to deny or to retract +those things, which embarrassed them. + + + + +CHAPTER III. Of the Authority of the Councils, of the Fathers of the +Church, and of Tradition + +It is only in the Fathers of the Church, and the Councils, that we can +find the proofs of the authenticity of the Christian traditions, and +according to the proofs which remain it appears, that they only approved +or rejected opinions, as they found them favourable or injurious to the +interests of the party which they had embraced. Every ecclesiastical +writer, and every assembly of Bishops, adopted as canonical the writings +in which they found their own particular dogmas, the others they treated +as apocryphal or suppositious. A slight acquaintance with the writings +of the Fathers, will show us that we cannot rely on them for any facts; +we shall find that their books are filled with negligences, tales, +impertinences and falsehoods; we shall see them buried in the thickest +darkness of superstition and prejudice. Every word announces their +incredulity or their insincerity. St. Clement the Roman, believed the +fable of the phoenix reviving from its ashes, and cites it as a proof of +the resurrection. + +Papias, who was the master of St. Irenaeus, was, in the opinion of +Eusebius himself, a man of weak mind, a fabulous author, who had +contributed to lead many men into error, and amongst others St. Irenaeus +who was his disciple, whom Eusebius regards as a very credulous man, +though he was the first ecclesiastical historian of note. It is not +surprising that those who have followed such guides have fallen into +error. + +On the other side, we should never finish, were we to enter into a +detail of the excesses committed by the Fathers of the Church and the +Councils: their history would only serve to prove their ambition their +pride, their infatuation, their seditious spirit, their cheats, their +intrigues, and their cruelties in the persecutions which they excited +against their adversaries. It is nevertheless on the probity and on the +knowledge of these great personages that we are called to rely! It is +pretended that it is from them that we hold the pure oracles of truth; +must we then take lessons of mildness, of charity, of, holiness, +from the writings of some factious individuals, who were perpetually +quarrelling and treating their adversaries with the utmost cruelty, +whose works were filled with gall, whose conduct it is admitted even by +their own friends and admirers, was almost always unjust, violent, and +criminal? How can it be expected that we should find any point of unity +in the canons and decrees of assemblies agitated by intrigue, discord, +and animosity? How can we regard as saints, and infallible doctors, as +persons worthy of our confidence, perverse men, continually involved in +disputations with others, and in contradictions with themselves? +What guide can we expect to find in turbulent priests whose ambition, +avarice, and intriguing and persecuting spirit are every where visible? +It is only necessary to read ecclesiastical history to be convinced that +the picture which we have drawn of the Councils and Fathers is no ways +exaggerated. + +On the other hand the writers and Councils on whose authority, +Christians are called upon to found their belief, do, in all their +traditions, but blindly follow and copy each other; we see them devoid +of the arts of reasoning, of logic, and of criticism; hence their +works are found filled with fables, vulgar errors, and forgeries. Is it +possible to believe the traditions of such a man as St. Jerome, who in +his life of St. Anthony, assures us that this holy man had a conference +with satyrs with goats feet? Do we not justly doubt the sincerity of St. +Augustine, when he says, "that he had seen a nation composed of men, +who had eyes in the middle of their stomachs?" Are such authors more +entitled to credit, than those of Robinson Crusoe, and of the Thousand +and One Nights? + +Supposing even that at the commencement of Christianity, there had been +authentic books in which the actions and the discourses of Jesus Christ +and his Apostles had been faithfully related, should we be justified +in supposing that they have been handed down to us such as they were +originally? Prior to the invention of printing, it was doubtless much +easier to impose upon the public than it is now, and notwithstanding, we +see that the _Press_ gives currency to innumerable falsehoods. + +The spirit of party causes every thing to be adopted that is useful +to its own cause. That granted, how easy was it for the heads of the +Church, who were once the only guardians of the holy books, either from +pious fraud, or a determined wish to deceive, to insert falsehoods and +articles of faith, in the books entrusted to their care. + +The learned Dodwell admits, that the books which compose the New +Testament did not appear in public, until at least 100 Years after +Christ. If this fact be certain, how shall we convince ourselves that +they existed prior to this time? These books were solely entrusted to +the care of the ecclesiastical gentry, till the third or fourth +century, that is to say, to the guardianship of men, whose conduct +was universally regulated by self interest and party spirit, and who +possessed neither the probity nor knowledge requisite for discovering +the truth, or of transmitting it in its original purity. Thus each +doctor had the power of making such holy books as he pleased, and +when, under Constantine, the Christians saw themselves supported by the +Emperor, their chiefs were able to accept, and cause to be accepted as +authentic, and of rejecting as apocryphal, such books as suited their +interest, or did not agree with the prevailing doctrine. But were we +even sure of the authenticity of the books, which the church of this +day adopts, we are nevertheless, without any other guarantee of the +authority of the scriptures than the books themselves. Is there a +history which has the right to prove itself by itself? Can we rely upon +witnesses who give no other proof of what they advance than their own +words? Yet the first Christians have rendered themselves famous by their +deceptions, their factions, and their frauds, which are termed pious +when they tend to the advantage of religion. Have not these pious +falsehoods been ascribed to the works of Jesus Christ himself and to the +Apostles his successors? Have we not, in their manner, sybilline verses, +which are evidently all Christian prophecies, made afterwards, and often +copied word for word into the Old and New Testament? If it had pleased +the Fathers at the council of Nice, to regard these prophecies as +divinely inspired, what or who should have prevented them from inserting +them into the canon of the Scriptures? And from that the Christians +would not have failed to regard them in the present day, as indubitable +proofs of the truth of their religion. + +If the Christians at the commencement of Christianity, gave credit to +works filled with reveries, such as the Shepherd of Hermas, the Gospel +of the Infancy, the Letter of Jesus Christ to Algarus, what confidence +can we have in such of their books as remain? Can we flatter ourselves, +with having even these such as they were originally written? How can we +at the present time, distinguish the true from the false, in books, in +which enthusiasm, roguery and credulity pervade every page. + +Since the gospels themselves fail in the proofs necessary to establish +their authenticity, and the truth of the facts which they relate, I +do not see that the epistles of St. Paul, or the Acts of the Apostles, +enjoy in this respect a greater advantage. If the first Christians had +no difficulty in attributing works to Jesus, would they have been over +scrupulous, in doing the same to his apostles, or in making for +them romantic legends, which length of time has caused to pass for +respectable books? If a body of powerful men, had it in their power to +command the credulity of the people, and found it their interest, they +would succeed, at the end of a few centuries, in establishing the belief +that the adventures of Don Quixote were perfectly true, and that the +prophecies of Nostradamus were inspirations of the divinity. By means of +glossaries, commentaries and allegories, we may find and prove whatever +we desire; however glaring an imposture may be, it may, by the aid of +time, deception, and force, pass in the end for a truth, which it is not +permitted to doubt; Determined cheats supported by public authority +may cause ignorance, which is always credulous to believe whatever +they choose, especially by persuading it that there is merit in not +perceiving inconsistencies, contradictions, and palpable absurdities, +and that there is danger in reasoning. + + + + +CHAPTER IV. Life of St. Paul, according to the Acts of the Apostles + +I have thus far shewn that nothing was more destitute of proof than the +authenticity of the books which contain the life and writings of St. +Paul. I have shewn that the Acts of the Apostles, and the Epistles of +St. Paul, were rejected by some Christian sects which subsisted from the +earliest times of the church. It must have been seen that the opinion +of the authenticity of these books was founded solely on traditions, to +which it is very difficult to give credit, considering the characters of +those by whom these traditions have been transmitted, it is however upon +such suspicious guarantees, that the authority of these works has been +pretended to be established; it will then be necessary to admit them +at once and without examination, or else recur to reason in order to +examine for ourselves, what we ought to think concerning them. + +To form our ideas of St. Paul, let us then consult only these works, +however suspected their origin may appear to us, which contain the +detail of his life; there are no others to which we can have recourse. + +The author of the Acts of the Apostles, whoever he be, relates the +miraculous conversion of Saul, afterwards called Paul, in the ninth +chapter. We find him already named in the two preceding chapters, first +as approving of the death of St. Stephen, the first martyr for the +Christian religion, and next as persecuting and desolating the church. +Not contented with tormenting the Christians of Jerusalem, he furnished +himself with letters from the High Priest which authorised him to seize +those whom he might find at Damascus; but, while on the road a miracle +caused him to change all his projects; he is suddenly surrounded by a +divine light, without seeing any one, he hears the voice of Jesus of +Nazareth, who demands of him the motives of his persecutions. Saul +trembling enquired what conduct he ought to pursue. Jesus tells him, +that at Damascus he would be informed of his intentions. Our persecutor +on this occasion is struck blind, but his heart is converted, and +sight is miraculously restored to him by a Christian of Damascus named +Ananias, who had been, by a particular revelation informed of his +hostile designs against the church, and of the great designs of God, +who, of this persecutor, would form a vessel of election, that is to +say the Apostle of the Gentiles. + +Soon after this conversion and cure, Saul is baptized and commences +preaching Christ in the synagogues, confounding the Jews to such a +degree that they came to the resolution to take away his life. But the +new missionary deceived their vigilance by saving himself during the +night by means of a basket, in which he was lowered, and made his escape +from Damascus. He returned to Jerusalem where the disciples of Jesus +were thrown into consternation at his appearance; but Barnabas presented +him to the Apostles, informed them of his conversion, and enrolled him +to their college. In consequence he preached the Gospel; this conduct +soon raised troubles and persecutions against him on the part of the +Jews, who again formed the design of putting him to death. But he found +means of escaping from their fury by the assistance of some disciples +who conducted him to Cesarea, whence they afterward sent him to Tarsus. +Barnabas came and joined Saul in the latter city, whence he led him to +Antioch. Here Saul and Barnabas remained during a year, they there made +a great number of converts; it was there that the proselytes first took +the name of Christians. To warm the zeal of the new converts, they sent +for prophets from Jerusalem, one of these named Agabus predicted a great +famine, which determined the disciples of Antioch to distribute alms +to their brethren of Judea; Saul and Barnabas were the bearers of these +marks of generosity, and the Apostles, whom the first faithful made +the depositaries of their riches, knew, without doubt, the price of the +acquisition that the sect had made in the person of the new missionary*. + + * Acts of Apostles, chap. 12. + + + + +CHAPTER V. St. Paul styles himself the Apostle of the Gentiles--Causes +of his Success. + +All proves to us that Paul and his associate Barnabas found it much +easier to convert the Gentiles than the Jews, who showed themselves +almost always rebels to their lessons. The docility of the first, and +indocility of the latter may be traced to very natural causes; the +idolators were destitute of instruction, their priests, content with +exacting from them their offerings and sacrifices, never thought of +instructing them in their religion; thus our missionaries encountered +few obstacles in persuading them of the truth of the novelties which +they came to announce to them. It was not thus with the Jews, who had +a law, to which they were very strongly attached, since they were +convinced that it had been dictated by God himself. In consequence our +preach-. ers could not make themselves listened to, but, in proportion, +as the doctrine they preached agreed with the notions with which the +Jews were previously imbued. The Apostles were therefore compelled to +reason with the Jews, according to their own system, to shew them that +the Christ whom they announced was the Messiah which they expected from +their own prophets; in a word, in preaching the Gospel to the Jews, the +preachers were driven into embarrassing discussions, and perpetually +exposed to cavils and contradictions which they had no fear of on the +part of the Gentiles, who received without disputing the novelties which +they broached to them, and which besides agreed well enough with the +notions of the pagan mythology, as we have shewn in another work. + +On the other side also, the idolators had not the exclusive ideas of +religion peculiar to the Jews; they were tolerant, they admitted every +species of worship, and were disposed to pay homage to every God that +was proposed to them. The Hebrews were not of this disposition, they +believed themselves alone in the possession of the knowledge of the true +God, and rejected with horror strange Gods and worships. + +These reflections are sufficient to explain to us the reason of the +great success that the Apostles had in preaching to the Gentiles, +compared with their endeavours amongst the Jews; they likewise show us +especially the true motives of Paul's conduct. In fact, repulsed by +the cavils and opposition of the Jews, we see Paul and Barnabas turn +themselves to the side of the Pagans, who listened to them with more +attention and declared to the Jews, that God had forsaken them*. + + * Acts of Apostles, chap. xiii. ver. 45, &c, + +The Gentiles were apparently flattered by the preference; numbers of +them adopted the religion announced to them, which did not hinder the +Jews from exciting, against our missionaries, the zeal of the female +devotees whose clamour obliged them to quit Antioch. + +From thence our two associates, after having shook the dust of their +feet against their opposers, repaired to Iconium, where they again met +with opposition on the part of the Jews who even irritated the Gentiles +against them, which compelled them to fly to Lystra in Lycaonia. There +according to the Acts of the Apostles, Paul thought it necessary to +perform a miracle, well knowing that nothing is more efficacious than a +prodigy in making an impression on the minds of the vulgar. + +He then cured a lame man. This miracle convinced the idolators, who took +Paul and his comrade for Gods, and under this idea would have offered +them sacrifices. However this wonder did not produce the same effect +upon the Jews; these apparently regarded it as a deception, or some +trick of which they were not the dupes. In fact we see that the Jews, +who nevertheless yielded to no people in credulity, so far from being +moved by Paul's miracle, that they stoned him as a malefactor and left +him for dead. From this unlucky affair he however extricated himself and +returned to Antioch, whence he set out in order to give an account of +the success of his mission, from which it appears that he had no reason +for self congratulation, since, if he made a number of recruits for +Jesus, he had succeeded at the expence of much personal ill usage. + +Nevertheless the Nazarenes, or Ebionites, i. e. the first of the Jews, +who had embraced the doctrine of the Apostles, were persuaded that the +religion of Christ was merely a reformed Judaism. Always attached to +the practices of the Mosaic law, they believed themselves called upon to +evince their zeal in its favour; in consequence of which they pretended +that the Gentiles, converted by the Apostles, ought, like themselves, +to submit to the rite of circumcision. But Paul and Barnabas strongly +opposed this opinion*; they were well aware that so painful an +operation, especially after a certain age, would be very likely to +dishearten the heathen whom they had drawn to their sect. But as +the affair appeared very important they referred the decision to the +Apostles who remained at Jerusalem. In consequence Paul and Barnabas, +and also the partisans of circumcision, repaired, thither, each with the +view of maintaining their own opinion. The question was argued, and our +two missionaries convinced the Apostolic College of the necessity of +freeing the Gentiles from a rite at which they revolted. Thus, according +to the author of the Acts of the Apostles, (who appears to have been +devoted to St. Paul's party) it was decided, that the newly converted +Gentiles should be exempted from a ceremony which, until now, had been +regarded as highly essential, since it had been ordained by the Divinity +himself. + + * See Acts of Apostles, chap. xv. ver. 5; see also in the + second chapter, of this work what is said of the Nazarenes. + +There is reason to believe that the old Apostles did not subscribe +without great reluctance to a decision which seemed to annul one of the +capital points of the Mosaic law, and had the appearance of rectifying +the ordinances, of the Most High. Jesus himself in his infancy underwent +the ceremony of circumcision; during his life he practised the customs +prescribed to his nation; he formerly declared that he was come, not to +destroy, but to accomplish the law of the Jews; and nevertheless we see +St. Paul and his adherents, of their own authority, annul at one blow a +ceremony of divine institution, approved of and observed by their master +and that for political and worldly considerations, which saints ought +never to regard. + +However this may be, by this decision, which Paul extorted from the +Apostles, it seemed from that time to give the signal of the schism, +which in the end totally separated the Jews from the Christians. +Nevertheless we shall soon see Paul, who on this occasion took in +hand the cause of the Gentiles, prepare (resuming the old errors) and +circumcise a disciple himself. So true it is, that the greatest saints +are not always consistent in their opinions, nor uniform in their +conduct. + +The Apostles having shewn so much indulgence in the article of the +circumcision of the Gentiles, were, however desirous of giving a kind of +satisfaction to the partisans of Judaism; with this view they prohibited +the new converts from worshipping idols, from giving themselves up to +fornication; and ordered them to abstain from things strangled and from +the blood of animals. By these means they sought to conciliate every +one; the Gentiles were not circumcised, and submitted themselves, in +part, to the ordinances of the Jews, who thus saw a deference always +paid to the law of their fathers, to which they were ever strongly +attached *. + + * See Acts of Apostles, chap. xv. All seems to prove that + the Apostles soon repented of the weakness they had been + guilty of in ceding to St. Paul, for we find he formed a + separate party, who preached the Gospel in his own manner, + that is to say, the Gospel of the uncircumcision. + +Furnished with this decision of the council of Jerusalem, in which the +Apostles declare themselves authorised by the Holy Spirit, Paul and +Barnabas returned to Antioch, whence they were desirous of visiting +the towns where they had already preached; but a contest respecting the +choice of an associate of their labours, made a breach between our two +missionaries and caused a separation between them. Barnabas accompanied +by Mark embarked for the Isle of Cyprus, whilst Paul with Silas, his new +companion, traversed Syria and Cilicia to confirm in the faith those who +had been recently converted *. + + * It ought here to be remarked, that there exists yet a + Gospel of the Nazarenes, the honour of which has been + decreed to St. Barnabas, and in which Paul is roughly + handled. In fact this Apostle preached, as we have shewn, + besides uncircumcision, a doctrine very different from that + of the Nazarenes, Ebionites, or first Christians, who, + according to St. Irenaeus, St. Epiphanius, and Eusebius, + regarded Jesus merely as a man, the son of Joseph and Mary, + and who was called the Son of God, only on account of his + virtues. This may enable us to guess at the cause of Paul's + quarrel with Barnabas, whose Gospel insinuates that Paul was + in error in teaching that Jesus was God. + + + + +CHAPTER VI. Paul preaches in Asia Minor, Macedonia, and Greece + +Upon his arrival at Lystra, St. Paul, notwithstanding the indulgence +of the Council of Jerusalem, thought it good policy to circumcise a +proselyte named Timothy, who was born of a Gentile father and a Jewish +mother. The Acts of the Apostles inform us of the motive of this +circumcision (chap. xvi. ver. 3) it being done "because of the Jews +which were in those quarters." + +Our two Missionaries now travelled over several provinces of Asia Minor, +such as Phrygia and Galatia, and yet we find that the Holy Ghost forbade +them to announce the word of God in Asia. We may indeed suppose, that +in this passage, the "Holy Ghost" is only intended to indicate that our +missionaries themselves perceived, that it would be dangerous for them +to preach their doctrine; for in the Holy Scriptures the persons of whom +it speaks are always supposed to act from divine impulse. + +Paul had a vision, which persuaded him to go to Macedonia. Being arrived +at Phillippi, he preached to the women with such success, that he had +the happiness of converting a dealer in purple, named Lydia, who, from +gratitude, invited them pressingly to lodge in her house. They were +well accommodated no doubt, since devotees take great care of their +directors; but our holy personages had the misfortune to perform a +miracle which deranged all their affairs. Paul cast out the evil spirit +from a damsel, who having a spirit of divination, brought great profit +to her masters by soothsaying. The cure, or perhaps conversion, of +this slave, displeased her masters, they carried their complaint to +the magistrates; the people took a part against our preachers, who were +beaten with rods and then sent to prison. An earthquake retrieved their +affairs, they gained over the gaoler whom they converted to the faith. +In the meantime the magistrates sent him an order to release our +prisoners. But Paul, bearing in mind the scourging they had received, +required that the magistrates should come in person and release them, +asserting that they were Roman citizens: at these words the magistrates +were intimidated, and came with apologies to set them free, begging them +to leave their city, which request they complied with, after having +been to console Lydia the devout, and the brethren, who according to +appearances did not suffer them to depart empty-handed. This bad success +did not discourage our missionaries who were aware doubtless, that +they were inconveniences attached to their profession. They now went to +Thessalonica, where Paul had the good luck to make some proselytes +both among Jews and Gentiles; he converted especially, some ladies +of quality; but the hardened Jews were very much irritated at his +successes; they endeavoured to apprehend Paul and Silas, but not being +able to find them, they dragged Jason, their host, and some of the +brethren, before the magistrates, accusing them of treason, and of +acknowledging another king besides Caesar. + +This uproar obliged our missionaries to decamp during the night from +Thessalonica, and take the road to Berea, where they were well received +by the Jews, since Paul succeeded in convincing them that the Gospel +which he announced was clearly predicted in their own Scriptures: there +is reason to believe that this was effected by the aid of mystical, +cabalistical, and allegorical senses, of which he so well knew the use, +in finding in the Old Testament sufficient to establish whatever he was +desirous of proving. + +He gained in this city a great number of recruits from amongst the Greek +females of quality, women, according to St. Jerome are best fitted to +propagate a sect; their levity makes them easily caught by novelties; +their ignorance renders them credulous; their talkativeness spreads +the opinions with which they are imbued; and, in short, their obstinacy +strongly attaches them to the way of thinking they have once adopted. In +a word we see, that in all times the Christian religion has been under +the greatest obligations to women; it is to them that innovators ought +especially to address themselves when they have opinions to establish, +it is by their aid that fanatics and devout impostors succeed in giving +importance to their doctrine, and sow the seeds of discord in society. +It appears that in the time of Paul, women had the right of speaking or +of prophesying in the church, of this, they have since been deprived, +and they are only allowed the privilege of bawling in public, in +favour of the systems of their holy directors, whom they always believe +infallible, without so much as knowing the state of the question. The +Quakers are now the only sect which permits women to preach *. + + * There appears some little ambiguity in this paragraph, + since if the levity of women renders them so easily + susceptible to the embracing new opinions, the obstinacy + with which they are charged in adhering to old ones, would + seem to neutralize the opposite propensity, and like the + infinite attributes of Justice and Mercy in the Christians' + God, they would annihilate each other. The fact is, that the + ignorant of either sex, are always the most credulous, and + their opinions, when imbibed, are seldom to be dignified + with any other term than prejudice. Of the great influence + of woman in society, no one can doubt, and it is the duty of + all who think, and who desire a reformation of the present + semi-barbarous state of society, to endeavour to inform and + enlighten the female mind; it belongs to man to war against + old systems, and errors rendered sacred by their antiquity, + and perhaps to lay down some few elementary principles, + founded upon a more rational basis, but so long as the + infant mind is under the controul of woman, it is to her + that we must look to see those principles implanted: it is + by the aid of woman that the mass of mankind will (if ever + it be done) be transformed from a herd of slaves, to a race + of happy and intelligent beings, knowing their rights, and + daring to defend them. + +The Jews of Thessalonica proceeded to trouble our preachers, in their +apostolic labours, to such a degree that Paul was under the necessity +of flying. He, however, took care to leave two missionaries at Berea, +to watch over the flock which he had gathered. Nevertheless these soon +received orders to join him at Athens. + +In this celebrated city the zeal of our Apostle kindled, he had +conferences with the philosophers: desirous to learn the nature of the +discoveries which this man had come to announce to them, they conducted +him to the Areopagus, there Paul harangued them and spoke to them of +his God, in a manner something conformable to the notions already +entertained by some of the Greek philosophers of the Divinity. To +confirm his discourse he cited to them a passage from the poet Aratus, +who nevertheless appears to suppose, according to the doctrine of Plato, +that God is the soul of the world. He inveighed against gods made of +stone and metal, which did not shock the philosophers, whose ideas were +more refined than those of the vulgar. + +Thus far our orator was attentively heard, but the sages of Athens would +no longer listen to him, when he began to speak of the last judgment, +and of the resurrection, which they regarded as an absurd and ridiculous +notion. Nevertheless the preaching of Paul was not totally useless at +Athens, the dogma of the resurrection was no obstacle to the conversion +of Dionysius, the Areopagite, a woman named Damaris, and some others. +These were none of them shocked at this doctrine, which was so revolting +to philosophers, who were accustomed to the study of nature, and who +refused to adopt, without examination, such marvellous and romantic +ideas. + + + + +CHAPTER VII. Preaching of St. Paul at Corinth and Ephesus + +After leaving Athens our Apostle came to Corinth. It appears that +at first he had not much success, for he took to his old trade of +tent-making. However, he ventured to preach in the synagogue, where the +Jews were indignant at his discourse: they carried him to the tribunal +of the proconsul of Achate, who had sufficient prudence to refuse to +interfere in their contests. The Jews did not imitate his moderation; +they ill-treated Sostenus, the chief of their synagogue, either for +having allowed Paul to preach there, or for having been converted by his +discourse. + +Paul, after some days, departed from Corinth, he cut off his hair to +fulfil a vow he had made, and which apparently obliged him to be present +at Jerusalem, in order to sacrifice in the temple, according to the law. +Whence we see that our Apostle had not yet totally abandoned the Jewish +religion, and that he judged it good policy, occasionally to manoeuvre +with the Jews. In fact we continually see him sometimes practising, and +at others decrying, Judaism. From Jerusalem, Paul went to Antioch, where +he remained some time, but the activity of his mind soon put him in +motion. After having crossed the high provinces of Asia he came to +Ephesus, where he found the secret of uniting to his sect the disciples +of St. John the Baptist, whom he rebaptized, and made them acquainted +with the Holy Ghost of whom they had no idea. Having now increased his +party by these new recruits, Paul set about preaching in the synagogue, +but finding the Jews rather untractable, he withdrew himself, and +separated his disciples from them. He then commenced teaching in a +separate school and performing miracles to confirm his discourses; he +cured the sick, and especially those possessed, in which he succeeded +much better than those of the Jews, who endeavoured from his example to +attempt such cures. These miracles converted many persons. + +Nevertheless, the preaching of Paul at Ephesus gave rise to an affair, +which had nearly proved very troublesome. The Goldsmiths of this city +derived much profit from the manufacture of little silver shrines of +Diana, the patroness of the Ephesians These artisans were much disturbed +with the preaching of our apostle, who decried the gods, and might thus +occasion the ruin of their trade; their clamour alarmed the people, and +caused a great commotion; the public, as is generally the case, when the +affair relates to religion, grew very violent, without knowing why. They +comprehended, in general terms, that their religion and its patroness +were attacked; and there needed nothing more to inflame their zeal. +However the town-clerk of the city having explained to them that +their goddess was in no danger, succeeded in calming the fury of +the superstitious populace, and thus extricated our apostle from his +embarassments. + +Paul, however, thought proper to quit a city, in which he had run such +a risk, and again put himself in motion. Arrived at Troas he recommenced +preaching, when his sermon, being a little too long, sent a young man to +sleep, who fell from the third story into the street: they took him up +for dead, when our Apostle having embraced him, assured them that he +lived, the author of the Acts, takes this fact for a miracle, and tells +us gravely that Paul raised a dead man on this occasion. + +Notwithstanding this pretended miracle, which if it had been true +ought to have converted the whole town, Paul went directly away, and +recommenced his travels. At Miletus he took leave of the priests of all +the adjacent places, after having made them a pathetic exhortation, in +which he boasts of his humility and disinterestedness, and desires them +to watch over the flock which he had gathered together by his preaching +and indefatigable exertions. + + + + +CHAPTER VIII. The Apostle gets into embarrassments at Jerusalem, and is +sent to Rome + +Paul now embarked for Jerusalem; notwithstanding his own presentiments, +the warnings that were given him, and the prayers of his adherents, +he was obstinately determined to resort to this city, where the Jews +irritated by his successes, prepared him an unpleasant reception. He +was welcomed by the brethren, to whom he related the progress of the +new sect, but these informed him of the bad designs of the Jews, who +pretended, and not without reason, that he taught a doctrine contrary +to that of Moses. To silence these rumours, and to calm the anger of the +populace, they advised him to fulfil some of the Jewish ceremonies in +public, and to give to these acts of religion much solemnity. + +Paul consented to this counsel, but the Jews of Asia, were not thus +duped, they knew what to keep to respecting the doctrine which had +disgusted them; they then excited the Jews of Jerusalem, by saying, that +he brought the Gentiles into the Temple. All the city was soon in an +uproar, the devout people seized Paul, drew him out of the Temple, the +gates of which were closed against this profaner. They were going to +kill him, had not a tribune rescued him out of their hands, and shut him +up in a fortress, in the midst of the clamour of an enraged populace, +which demanded his death. + +The Apostle ready to enter his prison, asked of the tribune permission +to harangue the mob, which was granted after his Conductor was +probably assured that he was not the brigand who had lately excited an +insurrection in the country. + +In his discourse, which he pronounced in Hebrew, Paul related to the +people the history of his miraculous conversion, nearly in the manner +in which it has been narrated. This recital far from softening the Jews, +made them lose all patience, especially when our Apostle told them he +was sent to the Gentiles. They then broke silence, crying out, "away +with such a fellow from the earth, it is not fit that he should live." +The tribune then shut him up in prison, and commanded that he should be +scourged, in order to draw from him an acknowledgment of the crime which +had excited the fury of the Jews. Paul then declared himself a Roman +citizen, and represented to the centurion charged with the execution +of these orders, that it was contrary to law, thus to treat a citizen +without a trial. The centurion informed the tribune, who was fearful of +having acted with too much precipitation. He was desirous of knowing for +a certainty of what he was accused by the Jews, and the next morning, +freeing him from his chains, presented him to the priests and council of +the nation. Paul then began to harangue the council. He first declared +that in all he had done, he had followed strictly the dictates of his +conscience. At these words the High Priest gave him a box on the ear, +at which Paul being irritated, instead of turning the other cheek, +according to the precept of Jesus, abused the High Priest, treated him +as a hypocrite, or whitened wall. But as he perceived that he had given +offence by his insolence to a man respected by the Jews, he moderated +himself, and alleged that he was ignorant that it was the High Priest +whom he had thus addressed in such terms; an ignorance, however, which +cannot fail to excite surprise, considering that he was a man, who must +have been informed respecting the place where he was, and the quality of +those before whom he was speaking. Our orator was more of an adept, +in managing the opinions of his auditory: aware that the council was +composed of Sadducees, who denied the doctrine of the resurrection; +and of Pharisees, who supported it, he knew how to profit by this +circumstance, by sowing the seed of discord among his judges. In order +to this he pretended that he was a Pharisee, and the son of a Pharisee, +and asserted that they sought his life, because of his hope in the +resurrection of the dead, This stratagem produced the desired effect, +the Pharisees declared in his favour, and acknowledged his innocence, +saying, "We find no evil in this man, but if a spirit or an angel hath +spoken to this man, let us not fight against God." The tumult increased, +and the tribune fearing that the orator would be torn in pieces, put him +under a guard of soldiers, and carried him back to prison. + +During the following night, Paul had a vision, in which he thought he +saw the Lord, who told him to be of good courage; and prophecied that +he should go to Rome to bear witness. On the other hand forty fanatical +Jews, made a vow neither to eat nor drink till they had assassinated +Paul. This resolution had the approbation of the princes and priests, +who, according to the clerical spirit, found nothing more just than +assassination in order to get rid of an enemy. The senators also +consented to this treachery. But Paul's nephew having informed him of +this plot, he made the tribune acquainted with it, who to secure the +safety of his prisoner, and to rescue him from the fury of the Jews, +conducted him under a good escort to Caesarea, and put him under the +protection of Felix, the governor of that province. + +Paul, and his accusers, made their appearance before the pagan governor, +who, little versed in the theological disputes of the Jews, told them +that he should decide the affair when he was more fully acquainted with +the particulars. However some days after, he caused the Apostle to be +brought before himself, and his wife Drusilla, who was a Jewess; they +heard what he had to say to them of faith in Jesus Christ. But when +Paul, after having preached to them of justice, charity, and repentance, +spoke of the last judgment, they were afraid, and ordered him to retire, +postponing the hearing till a future time. Felix hoping to draw some +money from his prisoner, often sent for him to converse with him. This +conduct lasted two years, at the end of which period this Governor was +replaced by Festus. + +The Jews proceeded to accuse Paul before the new governor, and demanded +that he should be sent to Jerusalem. The accused, well knowing that +the place of this scene would be unfavourable to him, and fearing that +Festus would yield to the importunities of his enemies, appealed from +him to Caesar. This appeal suspended all proceedings. However Festus +having spoken of his prisoner to King Agrippa, who had the curiosity +to see a man that had made so much noise in Judea. Paul appeared before +this prince, justified himself from the accusations brought against +him, and finished by preaching the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This +doctrine appeared so strange to Festus that he did not doubt a moment of +his being deranged. However as folly did not seem to him a crime worthy +of death, he would instantly have acquitted him, had he not made an +appeal to Caesar. In consequence of this appeal, Paul was put on board a +ship about to sail for Italy. After many difficulties he was shipwrecked +on the coast of the isle of Malta, where the author of the Acts, from +whom we have taken this narrative, does not fail to make him perform +miracles, a necessary seasoning to legends. + +Amongst other wonders which Paul wrought in the isle of Malta, he cured +himself, in a very natural manner, of the bite of a viper; in fact, it +appears that he applied fire to it immediately, a simple and well known +remedy, but which was such a prodigy in the eyes of the poor Maltese, +that they took him, who was in possession of so fine a secret, for a +God*. There was apparently nothing more wonderful in the Apostle +curing the son of his host, whom he found ill of a fever and dysentery; +disorders which we find yield to very simple remedies. Still this cure +gained Paul great reputation, they soon brought him a great number of +sick, who, according to our historian, he did not fail to cure. They +rendered him great honours, furnished him with the necessary provisions +for his voyage, and he embarked for Italy. + + * Acts chap. xxviii. ver. 3-6. + +Upon his arrival at Rome, Paul was permitted to confer with the +Christians, and to preach to the Jews, whom he endeavoured to convert to +the faith of Christ by the law of Moses and the prophets, which he had +the talent of applying wonderfully to his views: Some smitten with the +mystical, cabalistical, and allegorical explications, that our Apostle +gave them, adopted his opinions, while many others resisted his +arguments. + +Indignant against the latter, he told them that their hardness of heart +had been predicted by Isaiah; he then gave them to understand, that God +had formed the project of blinding them, in order to have a fair pretext +for rejecting them, and transferring to the Gentiles, the light and +salvation of which the Jews had made themselves unworthy, by the +obstinacy in which it was the will of God that they should persist. + +This conduct of the Divinity must doubtless have appeared very strange +to the Jews. So the Acts inform us, that there arose from these +preachings of Paul, great contests among them. They turned apparently +upon predestination and grace; questions upon which Christian +theologians, have not after eighteen centuries been able to come, either +to an understanding or agreement. + +It appears that notwithstanding the obscurity of his doctrine our +Apostle succeeded in gaining proselytes to his sect; this obscurity +itself, has charms for many persons, who believe that a doctrine, is +so much the more marvellous or divine, as it is above the power of the +understanding. He preached during two years to the Romans, without any +person throwing obstacles in his way, and thus laboured to spread this +religion in the capital of the world. + +The Acts of the Apostles, which the church orders us to receive as of +divine inspiration, informs us nothing more. St Luke to whom this work +is generally attributed, has transmitted to us, neither the actions, +miracles nor death of his heroes. We are reduced to seek our information +thereupon from traditions, which the interests of the clergy would wish +us to regard, almost as sacred as divine inspirations. According to +these respectable traditions, our Apostle shed his blood for the faith +in the propagation of which he had laboured; he was, say they, beheaded +in the reign of Nero, and in the sixty-sixth year of the Christian era. + +After what has been said, we ought naturally to regard St. Paul as +the true founder of the pontifical see of Rome. Nevertheless certain +traditions, useful to the Roman Pontiffs, oblige us to believe that it +was St. Peter, who established his throne in the capital of the world; +the popes have thought, that their interests required, that they should +pass for the authorized successors of this Prince of the Apostles, to +whom Christ himself according to the Gospel, granted immense rights and +privileges. These traditions then make St. Peter travel to Rome, prior to +St. Paul, and only regard the latter as the subaltern associate in the +Apostolic labours of the former. + +Nevertheless some critics have ventured to doubt of the reality of St. +Peter's voyage to Italy, and his foundation of the first see in the +world, some authors otherwise very orthodox, without regarding the +interests of the Pope, or respect for the traditions which favour them, +have treated those pretensions as chimeras: as to the heretics, the +sworn enemies of the authority of the Roman Pontiff, they have asserted, +that the voyage of St. Peter to Rome was a fable invented by the +supporters and partizans, with a design to exalt his authority. Both +parties found their doubts or assertions upon these grounds. First, That +the books which the church considers as inspired, make no mention of the +voyage of Simon Peter, although the circumstance of going to plant the +faith in the capital of the world, was sufficiently remarkable to claim +a notice in preference to all the minor cities, which the Acts inform +us that he visited to preach; in fact, the Holy Ghost, or St. Luke his +organ, wishing to inform us in this history of the means made use of by +God, to propagate the Gospel, could not without injustice, omit such a +signal success, nor fail to give the honour of it to St. Peter, in case +he had a claim to it. + +Secondly, St. Paul who was at Rome at the same time, that Peter was +supposed to have been there, never once mentions this Prince of the +Apostles, in the epistles to the faithful at different places, while he +speaks to them of many other disciples of much less consideration than +his illustrious colleague: we ought piously to suppose that if St. Peter +had really established the faith at Rome, the Apostle of the Gentiles +would have been too equitable to ravish from him the glory, that must +have accrued to him from so fine a conquest. + +Thirdly, Our two Apostles, after the disputes, which they had at Antioch +would not have been desirous of meeting, or exhibiting in the same +place. St. Peter would naturally avoid a haughty colleague, who resisted +him to his face, and who publicly reproved him in a manner sufficiently +disagreeable. Besides Rome being a pagan city, naturally fell into the +department of the Apostle of the Gentiles. In short according to the +Acts of the Apostles, St. Paul was too hasty to agree long with an +associate greater than himself. His quarrel with Barnabas, for a slight +difference, proves that Paul was easily irritated. + +Fourthly, St. Peter wrote his first epistle from Babylon, and not from +Rome. It is true that the advocates of this voyage of Peter's, pretend +that Babylon is the same city as Rome, but this is a geographical error, +that without a great share of faith can never be admitted for a truth. +Again, the city of Babylon in Syria, no longer existed in the time of +Peter, there was then only a Babylon in Egypt; it is only there that we +can suppose Peter to have written this first epistle. + +Fifthly, The traditions which make St. Peter travel to Rome, are filled +with fables, which make them very suspicious, such as his dispute with +Simon the magician, who having raised himself into the air, by virtue +of his art, fell down and broke his limbs by virtue of the Apostles +prayers. We may also place in the list of fables, the apparition of +Christ to Peter, when he fled from Rome, and his crucifixion with his +head downwards. These facts are related neither by inspired authors, +nor eye witnesses, they are founded on traditions only, that is to say, +popular rumour, which many persons do not respect so much as the Pope, +and the clergy seem to desire. + +At the risk then of "uncovering Peter to cover Paul" we say that all +these reasons, seem at least to authorize a doubt respecting the voyage +of St. Peter to Rome, at any rate the Acts of the Apostles appears to +insinuate that Paul was the true founder of the see of Rome. He must +then be regarded as the first Pope. Besides the popes have adopted his +maxims, and faithfully imitate his policy in many respects; this would +easily be proved by comparing the almost constant principles of the +church of Rome, with those of our Apostle, which we shall soon have +occasion to examine. + + + + +CHAPTER IX. Reflections on the Life and Character of St. Paul + +Such is in a few words the life of St. Paul whom we are justly entitled +to regard as the principal founder of the Christian Religion. In fact +it appears that without him, the ignorant and rude disciples of Jesus, +would never have been able to spread their sect. In order to succeed +they required a man of greater information and activity, more +enterprising and enthusiastic, and possessing more dexterity than any of +those, who composed the apostolic college, before it was joined by Paul. +In him we see all those qualities united, which made him of all others, +the most fitted to lay the foundation of a new sect. He knew how to +profit by the lessons he had received from Gamaliel; from him he had +acquired a profound knowledge of the Jewish Scriptures, and learnt the +art of explaining them in an allegorical sense, or, in other words, the +Cabala by which we may find in these books whatever we desire. + +It can hardly be doubted that our Apostle, possessed much energy and +ambition. We first see him persecuting the disciples of Jesus with +ardour; and with the view of gaining his ends, and making court to the +priests, stoop to the trade of informer and spy. Apparently he expected +by these means to advance himself, but seeing the futility of these +ambitious hopes, and probably despised and neglected even by those whom +he had thus zealously served; he changes his batteries, threw himself +upon the enemies side, and seeing the abilities of those whom he found +at the head of the new sect, he felt how easily he could eclipse them, +and constitute himself the chief. + +There is reason to believe that these were the true motives of Paul's +conversion; a mind of his stamp in declaring itself on the side of the +new sect, at once satisfied its vengeance and ambition. It was then very +easy for Ananias to make him listen to reason. The apostles were +not slow in discovering the value of their new acquisition; they +acknowledged the superiority of such a man; they foresaw the advantages +the rising sect would derive from his knowledge, his active and +persevering genius and intrepidity of character. Thus we see the new +Apostle, from the moment that he was enrolled in the Apostolic College, +perform the principal part, and throw his coadjutors completely in +the shade. These contented with preaching at Jerusalem, seldom showed +themselves at a distance from this city, whilst our hero, continually +traversed the provinces, made spiritual conquests, and strengthened in a +hundred places the cause of the disciples of Christ, now become his own. +In a word Paul now becomes the soul of his sect; his enthusiasm extends +itself; he braves danger when it is necessary to increase the number +of his partizans; his ambition is flattered by the empire that he has +gained; crosses, fatigues, imprisonments, and blows are not capable +of abating his ardour; determined to succeed at any cost he sacrifices +every thing to the desire that he has of extending those opinions, which +give him the power of reigning over the minds of men. He knew well that +no-empire upon earth is more grateful or stronger than that of opinion. + +Nothing appears that ought to induce us to regard the activity, +obstinate constancy, and courage of Paul as miraculous or supernatural +effects. We find the same zeal, and frequently the same intrepidity +and obstinacy in all those strongly animated by ambition or any other +passion. Obstacles but serve generally to irritate energetic minds, more +and more, they make a merit of braving dangers; torture, and even death, +cannot restrain those who are thoroughly enamoured with any object in +which they have placed their happiness. + +St. Paul has been held up to us as a man divested of all personal views. +His humility, constancy, disinterestedness, and patience, have been +advanced, as undoubted proofs of his sincerity, and pure zeal for his +religion. But we say that all these things prove nothing but his violent +desire for success. The preachers of an infant and oppressed sect, +destitute of power, must always announce themselves with much +suppleness, mildness and humility; an ambitious man must in order to +gain men's hearts, effect much moderation and appear disinterested; +besides he is sure of losing nothing, when he shall succeed in +establishing his empire over the mind. Do devotees ever neglect their +spiritual guides? In short patience and constancy are necessary in all +enterprises; every man who would crown a great adventure with success, +ought to avoid hastiness. Nevertheless if we turn to the history of St. +Paul, we shall see that patience was not always his ruling virtue; +he very often spoiled his plans by his eagerness, and especially he +alienated the minds of the Jews, rather than converted them to his +opinions. He would perhaps have succeeded much better with them, had he +kept a better government over his impetuous temper, at which it appears +his coadjutors often revolted. Devotees generally mistake that for +zeal, which is but a vice in their character, and an imprudence in their +conduct. The bitter reply that Paul made to the High Priest, proves that +our Apostle was not excessively enduring, and forgot, at least, on some +occasions his Christian patience. + + + + +CHAPTER X. Of the Enthusiasm of St. Paul + +It appears certain that this apostle was filled with enthusiasm and +zeal. It will perhaps be asked whether we have a right to regard him +as an impostor? a thousand examples prove to us, that nothing is more +common, than to witness enthusiasm, zeal and imposture united in the +same person. The most sincere enthusiast is generally a man whose +passions are turbulent, and capable of blinding him; he takes his +passions for divine impulses, be deludes himself, and if we may be +allowed the expression, gets intoxicated with his own wine. A man who +at first engages in a particular cause from motives of interest, or +ambition, very frequently finishes by attaching himself to it with +sincerity and with strength proportioned to the sacrifices he may have +made for it. If he succeed in persuading himself, that the cause of his +passions is the cause of God, he will make no scruple of supporting +it by all sorts of means, he will sometimes allow the use of artifice, +deceit, and oblique ways of maintaining the opinions of which he happens +to be convinced. It is thus we daily see very zealous devotees, employ +deception, fraud, and sometimes crime, in support of the interests of +religion, i. e. of the cause they have embraced. + +Thus although in the first instance the desire of being revenged on the +priests, or ambitious views, may have determined St. Paul to join the +sect of Christians, he might have been able by degrees to attach himself +strongly to it, to persuade himself that it was preferable to the +religion of the Jews, and to employ objectionable means, in order to +make it succeed in the world. + +The examination that now remains for us to make of some features in the +conduct of our apostle, and of some passages in the writings which are +attributed to him, will serve better than any reasoning to determine the +judgment, we ought to come to respecting this person. Let us then hear +what he has to say for himself. This analysis will shew us whether +Paul was so sincere, disinterested, humble, mild, and upright as his +partizans, maintain him to have been. + +St. Paul in speaking of himself says: "That he knew a man who was caught +up into the third heaven, and that there he heard unspeakable words, +which it was not lawful for man to utter*." It appears in the first +place that no one but a man of a very heated imagination could with +sincerity pretend to have been caught up into the third Heaven; and no +one but an impostor, could assert such a fact without being persuaded +of it. In the second place we may ask of what use could it be to mankind +that St. Paul should hear in the third heaven, unspeakable words, that +is to say, such as it was unlawful for man to utter? What should we +think of a man who should come and assure us, that he possessed a secret +most important to our happiness, but yet one which he was not permitted +to divulge? Thus the voyage of St. Paul is either a chimera engendered +by a sickly brain, or a fable, contrived by a cheat, who sought to make +himself respected by boasting of the peculiar favours of the almighty. +This voyage then was perfectly useless, since it was not permitted him +who made it to relate that which he learnt from it. In short there is +malice in St. Paul thus irritating the curiosity of his hearers and +refusing to satisfy it. Under whatever point of view then we behold this +history or tale of Paul's ravishment into the third heaven, it can be of +no utility to us, and reflects but little honour upon himself. + + * 2 Corinthians, chap. xii. ver. 2, 3, 4. + + + + +CHAPTER XI. Of the Disinterestedness of St. Paul + +In narrowly examining into the conduct of our Apostle, we shall have +much difficulty in discovering that disinterestedness with which his +partizans are so desirous of investing him. We have already exposed the +natural motives which may have contributed to his conversion. If it be +true as the Acts of the Apostles, adopted by the Ebionites or Nazarenes, +asserts, that St. Paul flattered himself with the idea of marrying the +high priest's daughter, and failed in the project, the disappointment +might to a man of his passionate and hasty temper, be a motive +sufficient to determine him to change sides, and from being as we have +shewn him to have been the spy and satellite of the priests, basely +seeking to gain their good will, by becoming the agent in their furies +against the disciples of Jesus; to declare himself in favour of those, +who were their greatest enemies. It was perhaps the ill success of +Paul's amours, that determined him to a life of celibacy, and to boast +of it as meritorious, whilst according to the Jewish law, nothing was +held in less repute than this state. This holy man would doubtless +transform into a virtue, a conduct, which in him was nothing but chagrin +and ill temper. He asserts that it is good for men to abstain from +women; consequently our clergy have regarded celibacy as a virtue: they +have fancied themselves obliged to imitate the great St. Paul even in +his resentments against the sex. They have flattered themselves with +the idea of being able to resist like him the temptations of the flesh, +which often torments them; if they have indulgently permitted marriage +to the profane, it is because Paul has said, it is better to marry than +to burn. It is notwithstanding probable that the conversion of St. Paul +was occasioned by other motives than the anecdote related by the Acts +of the Ebionites, which appears exposed to many objections. In fact, +according to these Acts, Paul was a pagan born, was made a proselyte, +and consequently he could not, without having been guilty of great +folly, pretend to the daughter of a high priest, whose dignity was so +eminent amongst the Jews. On the other hand according to the writings +adopted by the Christians of our time, St. Paul was of the tribe of +Benjamin, and would not have been permitted to marry the daughter of a +high priest, who must necessarily have been of the tribe of Levi. Again +Paul was a mechanic, a tent-maker, a situation which must have deprived +him of all hope of an alliance so illustrious as that of a sovereign +Pontiff. Thus unless we suppose that love had totally blinded our hero, +to the obstacles which naturally opposed themselves to his desires, +there is reason to believe that his conversion, or change of party, +originated from other motives, than the chagrin of seeing his amours +frustrated. There is reason to believe that Paul being of a very unquiet +genius, was tired of his trade: desirous of trying his fortune, and +living without work, he became the spy of the priests and the informer +against the Christians. Dissatisfied with the priests, who perhaps had +not rewarded him to the extent of his expectations, he joined the new +sect, which assisted by his talents promised good success, or even a +probability that he might become the head; at least he might fairly +calculate on an easy and honourable subsistence without being obliged to +make tents, In fact he saw, that the apostles, who were vulgar men much +inferior to himself, lived very well at the expence of the new converts, +who eagerly brought their wealth and laid it at the apostles feet, +consequently Paul was sensible, how easy it was for him to live in the +same way, and provide himself a very comfortable birth, in a sect, in +which he felt himself capable of playing a very important part. His +ambition must have been more gratified with occupying one of the +first posts, even amongst beggars, than of cringing in an infamous +and dishonourable capacity, under avaricious, haughty and disdainful +priests. Indeed Paul himself tells us that he had relations of +considerable note among the apostles, who having embraced the faith +before him, might have laboured with success for the conversion of a man +so disposed.* + + * Epis, to Romans, chap. xvi. verse 7. + +The persecutions that he had excited against the disciples could not +have put any very serious obstacles in the way of his admission into the +apostolic college: nothing was required but to explain and agree upon +facts. The chiefs of the sect were very much flattered at seeing the +conquest made by their party of an inconvenient adversary, who came of +his own accord, and offered his services. His conversion, effected by a +miracle, did honour to his mission, and showed the vulgar the protection +of heaven, which changed the heart of the most bitter enemy of the +Christians. As Paul was not ignorant that in this sect great value was +set upon miracles, visions and revelations, he thought this was the most +favourable door by which he could enter, and render himself acceptable +to the Apostles; they received him with open arms well assured of the +sincerity of a man who after having made such an uproar could not recede +without making himself equally odious both to Jews and Christians. +St. Paul amongst other talents which rendered him a fit person to +propagate the new religion, understood, according to appearances, +Hebrew, Greek, and Latin, whilst in spite of the gift of tongues, we do +not find, that the other apostles possessed these advantages. In fact we +see them remain at Jerusalem, preaching to the Jews only, whilst the new +apostle extended his spiritual conquests, into the provinces of Asia and +Greece, where it appears that without him the Gospel would not have been +preached so soon. + +Once connected with the new sect, Paul had doubtless a great interest in +spreading it, in strengthening his party, and making converts in order +to gain support, and have the pleasure of reigning over a great number +of devotees. Thus, under every point of view, we see that our Apostle, +whether in his conversion, or in his preaching, was every thing but +negligent of his interest. All missionaries have necessarily ambition; +they propose to themselves the pleasure of governing minds, and every +thing proves that Paul was not exempt from a passion inherent in +all founders of sects. And further having once established his +ecclesiastical power, we often see him taking care of his temporal +interests, and making his flock feel how just it is that the priest +should live by the altar; in a word to occupy himself with the +emoluments of his preaching. "Let him," says he, "that is taught in the +word communicate unto him that teacheth in all good things.*" He speaks +in the same tone to the Thessalonicans (chap. v. ver. 12.) He likewise +recommends them an abundant charity. + + * Epis, to Galatians, chap. vi. ver. 6. + +It remains to be observed, St. Paul is not like his successors +ungrateful for the benefits which he has received. He thanks the +Philippians for having twice assisted him in his need. It appears that +in his time the Apostles did not possess the divine right that men had +the goodness to give them: but the clergy have since asserted that they +hold from God alone, that which they obtained from the generosity of +princes and people, which evidently frees them from the necessity of +showing gratitude to any one. + + + + +CHAPTER XII. Of the imperious Tone and political Views of St. Paul + +It appears by the writings attributed to Paul himself that the empire +which he exercised over the members whom he had added to his sect, was +not one of mildness. In proof of this, may be cited the manner in which +this spiritual despot speaks to the faithful of Corinth. "Moreover (says +he) I call God for a record upon my soul, that to spare you, I came not +as yet into Corinth."* Again, "For to this end also did I write, that I +might know the proof of you, whether ye be obedient in all things**". He +threatens the Corinthians, and says to them, "if I come again I will +not spare." Again he justifies the tone in which he talks, by saying, +"Therefore I write these things being absent, lest being present I +should use sharpness, according to the power which the Lord hath given +me to edification, and not to destruction."*** It is probably by virtue +of this right of chastising, here assumed by St. Paul, that the Pontiffs +and Priests of the Christians have since arrogated to themselves an +unlimited spiritual power over, the thoughts of their subjects. Their +empire extended itself by degrees over their persons; Christian priests, +exceeding the Apostle to whom the Lord had given this power to +edify, availed themselves of it to destroy those whom they found not +sufficiently submissive to their decisions. If St. Paul did not exercise +over his sheep a power so extensive, it is doubtless because he had not, +like our pastors, princes, magistrates and soldiers under his orders, +capable of executing his holy will: with his imperious temper we may +justly conclude that he would have conducted himself much in the same +manner as some fathers of the church, the Pontiffs of Rome, or the Holy +Inquisition. + +We see also that the Apostle, not satisfied with being sole judge in +spiritual affairs, was desirous of the power of deciding in civil suits. +"Dare any of you having a matter against another go to law before the +unjust, and not before the saints? Do ye not know that the saints shall +judge the world?****" This passage evidently proves that the Apostle +in the depth of his policy had already formed the design of making +the saints, i. e. the clergy, masters of the fortunes as well as the +consciences of the faithful. In fact, he adds, know ye not that we shall +judge angels? How much more, things that pertain to this life? We cannot +sufficiently admire the moderation of the Christian clergy, in not +having rigorously acted up to the letter of this decisive text, which +formally gives them the right of judging in all temporal affairs, or the +concerns of this life. Indeed it appears according to this passage, that +Christians in their transactions, ought to have no other judges, or even +sovereigns, than the church. It is from these maxims, that our priests +have become censors, or a kind of magistrates, who interfere with every +thing, and set themselves up for the judges of the legitimacy of civil +acts, of births and marriages, of which they have made themselves +masters; in a few words, they seize upon man the moment he is born, and +regulate all his motions until his death. It is from these pretences, +that the popes have impudently arrogated the power of disposing of +crowns, of exciting insurrections and wars, and of deciding upon the +rights of sovereigns and people. + + * 2 Corinthians, chap. i. ver. 23. + + ** 2 Corinthians, chap. ii. ver. 9. + + *** 2 Corinthians, chap. xiii. ver. 2. and 10. + + **** 1 Corinthians, chap. vi. ver. 1. and 2. + +It is by no means surprising that the heads of the Christian church, +have at all times held up St. Paul, as a man divinely inspired; have +for a distinction entitled him, the Apostle, have inculcated for his +writings the most profound veneration, and have caused them to be +considered, as the oracles of the Holy Ghost. This Apostle was evidently +the architect of the church. We may consider him especially as the +founder of the ecclesiastical hierarchy. It is to him that are owing the +prerogatives, privileges, divine rights and pretences of the clergy. +St. Paul established bishops, assigned them their rights, and in his +writings laid the foundations of that spiritual power, which has since +become so formidable to temporal authority. How could the inventor of so +many useful things, fail to be regarded as the organ of the divinity. + +Nevertheless, if we read the gospels with the slightest attention, we +shall find that Jesus has no where spoken of this hierarchy or power, +nor of the prerogatives of the clergy; on the contrary, we see him' +incessantly preaching to his apostles, equality, humility and poverty. +But in that as in many other instances, our Apostle thought himself +at liberty to correct the institutions of Christ, who on all occasions +shewed himself unfavourable to priests. These changes effected by +Paul are sufficient to make us acquainted with his secret policy. He +endeavoured apparently to make himself the spiritual and temporal +head of the churches, which he had by his labours, founded among the +Gentiles, with whom, as we have shewn, he had more success than amongst +the Jews. It was to gain them over that he became all things to all +men, that he dispensed them, as we have said, from the most essential +ordinances of the Mosaic law. In short he had the secret of insinuating +himself, into the minds of idolators, whom he sometimes took by surprize +accommodating himself to their capacities, and giving them as he himself +has said, sometimes milk, and at others, solid food. As we have already +sufficiently shewn, Paul after his successes with the Gentiles, gave +himself little trouble respecting the converted Jews, or with his elder +brethren in the apostle-ship; and openly declared himself against the +Mosaic law. As we have seen be went himself to Jerusalem, to solicit a +decree, to dispense the Gentiles from the rite of circumcision; this he +had much at heart, feeling how necessary this indulgence was, in order +to secure his new subjects. Thus it was he who enlarged the breach, +though small in its origin, which separated the Jews from the +Christians, or Nazarenes. This conduct naturally displeased the rest of +the apostles, who appeared, even after the council, always attached +to the Jewish ordinances, but who on this occasion, found themselves +compelled to cede to Paul, or at least to temporize with a man who had +gained an ascendancy over them. + + + + +CHAPTER XIII. Of the Humility, of St. Paul + +With the ability and ambitious conduct which we have just remarked in +St. Paul it is difficult to conceive that humility could have been his +ruling passion. Perusing his writings, we shall without much difficulty +discover that when he humbles himself it is generally with a view of +exalting himself in the eyes of his adherents; he does not fail to boast +of the penalties, sufferings, and labours that he has submitted to +for love of them, it is upon this, that he founds his claims to their +respect and gratitude. "Let a man so account of us, as of the ministers +of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God:" further on he adds, +"for I think that God hath set forth us, the apostles last, as it were +appointed to death: for we are made a spectacle unto the world, and to +angels, and to men." + +St. Paul then reproaches the Corinthians, with their ease, their luxury, +and their pretences, and compares their happy situation with his own. +"We are, (says he to them,) fools for Christ's sake, but ye are wise in +Christ: we are weak, but ye are strong; ye are honourable, but we are +despised. Even unto this present hour we both hunger and thirst, and are +buffeted, and have no certain dwelling place, and labour, working with +our own hands." He then enumerates the evils he has suffered, and adds +"I write not these things to shame you, but as my beloved sons to warn +you." Of what? He explains himself, and says, "For though you have ten +thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers; for +in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel." Our humble +missionary sends them his lieutenant, Timothy, to bring them back to +their duty, i. e. to the obedience they owed to their spiritual father, +he threatens them himself, and mildly demands of them, "What will ye? +Shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love, and in the spirit of +meekness?" + +In all this remarkable tirade there are no traces of that profound +humility, for which credit has been given to Paul: on the contrary, all +discovers a domineering spirit, and a desire of exclusive power over +the faithful whom he had converted. It is generally the proudest men who +complain the most bitterly of being despised and treated with contempt; +and, amongst devotees, Pride knows how to cover appearances with the +garb of humility. However, our Apostle does not give himself the trouble +to mask his self-love: in fact, when he compares himself to the rest of +the Apostles, he makes us understand, that though he terms himself the +last, he has a right to be considered as the first. He says, "For I +suppose I was not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles." It seems +that the Corinthians were shocked with the harshness of his tone; for he +adds, "but though I be rude in speech, yet not in knowledge: but we have +been thoroughly made manifest among you in all things." Then feeling +that they might be disgusted with these imprudent self commendations, he +says, "Seeing that many glory after the flesh, I will glory also." + +It is easy to see that our Evangelical Doctors propose to themselves +Paul's humility as a model for their own. It is doubtless, in imitation +of this great Saint, that the Pope calls himself the Servant of the +Servants of God, which does not, however, prevent him from making those +who refuse to acknowledge his unlimited power, and blindly subscribe to +his infallible decisions, feel his pastoral rod; but when the rulers of +the Church make use of this rod, it is only to shew their great zeal for +the interests of the Lord. + + + + +CHAPTER XIV. Of the Zeal of St. Paul; Reflections on this Christian +Virtue + +That passion which in common life is termed, anger, fury, vengeance or +delirium, becomes zeal as soon as its object is religion, or the cause +of God. It is a maxim among Christian devotees, that we cannot love God +too much, consequently we cannot sin in excess of zeal. According +to these principles, our doctors in their quarrels, injure, defame, +calumniate, and asperse, and when they have the power, persecute and +exterminate each other. Each sect, firmly persuaded that it is in the +right, and that its peculiar way of thinking is the only one that God +can approve, thinks itself justified in destroying the opinions of its +adversaries, which displeasing to itself, must consequently displease +the divinity. Thus in attentively examining the thing, we find that +religious zeal is nothing but anger, excited in a bigot by opinions +adverse to his own, or those of the party he has espoused. In a word, +zeal is the gall which contradiction secretes in the souls of bigots. +There can be no doubt, but that St. Paul has left a model of this sort, +which our evangelical doctors, have in all times faithfully copied. If +this great Apostle did not go to the extent of persecuting those who +resisted his arguments, or refused blindly to submit to his supreme +decisions, it is because he was not sufficiently strong; otherwise +judging from the warmth of his temperament we may reasonably presume, +that he would have been easily carried to extremities, well calculated +to justify the holy passion to which the heads of the church have since +given themselves up on all occasions, when they have had sufficient +power to give a lustre to their zeal. + +In fact we find, that Paul's self love, did not suffer contradiction +with too much patience. He delivers over to Satan those who refuse +to obey him, he pretended that any other Gospel, than his own, was +abominable. "I marvel that you are so soon removed from him that called +you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel." He pretends and +affirms that he alone taught the true doctrine, and that all others are +impostors, false prophets, and disturbers; we are obliged to believe on +his own word that he possesses infallibility. + +He goes so far as to say in the heat of his self-love "But though we, or +an angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you, than that which +we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so +say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you, than that +ye have received, let him be accursed."* This language might well appear +insolent, presumptuous, and even impious to those who have not faith, +nevertheless it is that which is invariably held by the chiefs of every +sect; we see them, upon their own authority, continually anathematizing, +excommunicating, damning and delivering over to the devil, whoever has +the temerity to understand the Gospel in any other way but their own. +Every doctor like Paul, declares himself and even believes himself to be +infallible; nothing in the world, (not even the angels of heaven) could +make him renounce opinions which his self-love, his obstinacy, and his +vanity, cause him to behold as the only true. + + * Epistle to Gal. Chap. i. ver. 8 and 9. + +The history of Paul, however furnishes us with an embarrassing +circumstance. Ardent in dispute and obstinately attached to his own +ideas, we see this infallible Apostle boasted of having resisted Cephas, +i.e. Peter, to his face, who nevertheless appears to have had titles to +infallibility, still better established than those of our Apostle; in +fact if Paul, in order to prove his own infallibility, supports it by +his visions, inspirations, revelations, and miracles: St. Peter might in +favour of his own, oppose to him a great number of visions, dreams, and +prodigies equally authentic with those of his brother. If Paul founded +the divinity of his mission, and the truth of his particular way of +thinking on his own testimony, could not St. Peter cite, in support of +his authority, the testimony of Jesus Christ, who had declared him the +chief of the apostles, who had established him, as the first shepherd of +his flock, and the rock on which, he would found his church? Is it not +upon this authentic evidence, that the Pope, who stiles himself +the successor of Peter, founds his infallibility, acknowledged and +maintained by the greater part of the Roman Catholic Clergy? There +is then reason to be astonished that Paul, with titles not so well +established, should have dared to resist Peter to his face, or that he +should have boasted of such resistance; and it is not less surprising +that the latter should have ceded to his junior in the apostleship, +having such powerful arguments to support his claim to infallibility. + +All may however be explained by the supposition that upon this occasion +St. Paul showed himself more headstrong than St. Peter, who for the +sake of peace, yielded to the eagerness of his adversary, and would not +support his own infallibility at the risk of exciting a schism in the +rising sect. We have seen in our time pious Jansenists avail themselves +of St. Paul's example, to resist to the face the infallible decisions of +the Roman Pontiff; but he, less moderate than his predecessor St. Peter, +would not cede, but remained obstinate in maintaining his irrefragable +authority, and by this means produced and fomented divisions, which the +determined zeal displayed by both parties, has rendered very dangerous. +The successor of St. Peter anathematizes, and finding himself the +strongest, persecutes the imitators of St. Paul, for daring to resist +him: these of course strongly attached to their principles which they +deem infallible, are obstinate in their resistance, detest the opinions +of their tyrants, and in spite of charity, very cordially damn those who +do not think like themselves, whilst these last from attachment to +the infallibility of the Pope, whom they have on their side, believe +themselves compelled, in conscience, to make their adversaries submit to +the most inhuman and unreasonable treatment. + +Such are the salutary effects which zeal has produced in the Church of +Jesus Christ, from the first preaching of the gospel to the present day. +The zeal of St. Paul not contented with exercising itself against his +brethren the apostles, shewed itself strongly in all situations. We see +him excite trouble and clamour in whatever cities he happened to be. We +generally term a man a public disturber, who troubles the peace of his +neighbours; but, in religion, a saint is a man who dares to preach his +own opinions, as those of God himself, at the risk of exciting the most +disastrous revolutions in society. His self-love becomes legitimate as +soon as its object is religion; proves to him in the most convincing +manner that he is always right; that his way of thinking is necessary +to salvation, and that all considerations ought to give way to such +an important object. If religious zeal is able one day to procure +advantages in the other world; it is at least very evident that it +causes many misfortunes here below. In the eyes of reason it is always +equally dangerous, even when it is the fruit of the most sincere +devotion. If the impostor, the ambitious man and the hypocrite, avail +themselves of it as a cloak to cover all crimes, the sincere bigot +thinks that zeal justifies the greatest excesses, and often makes a +merit, and even a duty, of detesting his fellows and troubling society. + +It is in fact difficult to reconcile zeal with the spirit of union, +concord, and peace, that Christianity recommends, or with that charity +which St. Paul places above all virtues, and without which, he assures +us that all the others are useless. But did this Apostle himself possess +much charity, when not satisfied with carrying trouble into every place +where he preached, he inveighed against those whom he found not disposed +to believe*? + + * Epistle to Tim. Chap. i. ver. 20. + +It is doubtless nothing but a lively faith, which can reconcile the +violent conduct of this great Apostle, with the charity which he +incessantly recommends. It appears at least difficult to have a sincere +regard for men whom zeal obliges us to hate, either as our own enemies, +or as the enemies of God. The subtle theology of the Christians, can +alone reconcile these incompatible dispositions. + +It is only the ministers of the Church, who have the talent of proving, +that without a violation of Christian charity, it is lawful to harass, +persecute, and destroy ones neighbours. They can in fact clearly show +that we may burn the body of a man, out of tenderness for his soul. They +think they have a right to excommunicate a man, or anathematize him, +that is to say, exclude him for ever from spiritual grace, to put him +in short into the road to damnation, to deliver him to Satan, for the +destruction of the flesh, in order to save him, according to the spirit. +This conduct is not the least inconceivable mystery of the Christian +religion; faith is doubtless necessary to find it either charitable +or intelligible. How can we conceive, for example, that the desire of +saving the soul of an heretic, or an impious man, can determine the +inquisition or Christian magistrates to consign him to the flames, even +while be persists in those opinions, which they suppose must plunge him +into hell? + + + + +CHAPTER XV. Of the Deceptions or Apostacy of St. Paul + +By the aid of faith we never find any thing to condemn in the conduct +of those, whom we have been accustomed to regard as saints; their +obstinacy, seditious spirit, pride, even their ferocity, are justified, +by saying that they are animated with a holy zeal. In a word, a saint +may violate with impunity, the most sacred rules of morality, without +his bigoted admirers permitting themselves to criticise his conduct. +Saints have always been in the habit of terming those chastisements, +which they have drawn upon themselves (oftentimes justly) by their +unruly passions or indiscreet zeal, persecution. Those whom a devout +phrensy excites to tumult and disorder are honoured as confessors and +martyrs, and we find the Jews and Pagans were the most unjust and cruel +of men, for having treated the Christians, whom they could not consider +but as disturbers of the public peace, in the same manner as the +Christians now treat the Jews, heretics, and infidels. Bigots, accustom +themselves to regard their saints as irreproachable characters, or if +they cannot justify their conduct, they say that God has permitted them +to sin, to humiliate them, in order that he might have an opportunity of +pardoning them. It is thus that every good Christian regards a brigand +in revolt against his legitimate sovereign, an usurper, a monster of +cruelty, an infamous adulterer, an assassin, in a word, a David, as a +great saint; or even by excellence, as the man after God's own heart! +Faith in the mind of a bigot, is able to reverse, even the most simple +rules of morality and virtue. Religion encourages the most perverse men +to give themselves up to the blackest crimes, the most shameful vices, +and the most shocking irregularities, by setting before them the +examples of scoundrels, who were nevertheless the friends of God. + +It cannot be pretended that St. Paul of whom we are now speaking, was +guilty of excesses, similar to those committed by the king of the Jews, +whose whole history is a series of horrors: but without faith it is +difficult to consider our Apostle as an irreproachable character; though +the historian, whoever he be, to whom we are indebted for the Acts of +the Apostles, has designed to hold him up as a model of virtue, we find +that by a singular oversight he did not seem aware, that he made him +tell an untruth in public, and in the most solemn manner in presence of +the Sanhedrim or great council of the Jews. In fact as we have already +remarked, perceiving that his audience was composed of Sadducees and +Pharisees, with the view of dividing them and gaining friends, Paul +cried out that he was a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee, and that they +sought to kill him, because of his hope in the resurrection. + +In this assertion we may detect two deceptions. In the first place Paul +was not a Pharisee, at the moment he spoke he was a Christian, he was +an Apostle, he preached Jesus Christ, he laboured effectually to make +proselytes to his sect, he had disgusted the Jews in announcing to them +a new law, contrary to that of Moses, he had procured in the council +at Jerusalem the abolition of the practice of circumcision so strictly +ordained by their law. In a word he preached Christianity and not +Judaism in the same moment that he declared himself a Pharisee. On this +occasion his conduct was in fact that of an apostate, at least it cannot +be denied, that he conducted himself as a coward, who did not care to +acknowledge his real belief in tbe presence of tbe council, and who had +recourse to an artifice to outwit his Judges. In fact the conduct of +Paul on this occasion has no resemblance to that of a great number of +martyrs, who freely acknowledge themselves Christians at the risk of +their lives, and boldly confessed Jesus Christ, in the presence of +their persecutors and executioners. The presence of tbe High Priest +and council so much imposed on St. Paul, that he declared himself a +Pharisee; fear troubled his memory to such a degree, that he forgot he +had just acknowledged himself a Christian, and missionary of Jesus to +tbe Gentiles in the presence of the people collected before tbe gate of +the fortress, who indignant at his discourse, cried out, "away with such +a fellow from the earth for it is not fit that he should live." Nothing +then but theological subtilty, can clear Paul from deception, apostacy, +and cowardice on this occasion. + +In the second place it was not true, that it was because of the hope +of another life, and of the resurrection of the dead, that Paul was +persecuted by the Jews. It was for having preached a new doctrine, +contrary to the law of Moses; this great legislator has in no part +taught us what we ought to believe concerning the resurrection of the +dead or of another life. The Jews without ceasing to be Jews, embraced +respecting it whatever opinion they pleased, the Sadducees rejected it +without however being on that account, excluded from the synagogue, +and without ceasing to observe tbe Judaic law; tbe Pharisee admitted it +without its appearing to cause a schism between them, ami those who +did not think, as they did. It is true that Paul had preached the +resurrection, but it was that of Jesus, on which he endeavoured to +establish a new sect very different from the Jewish religion. Thus the +words of St. Paul were merely a subterfuge unworthy of a man, whom grace +ought to have endued with sufficient courage to maintain before tbe +council, at the peril of his liberty and his life, the same sentiments +that he had taught tbe people and preached in all those places where he +had planted the faith. It was then for having preached Christianity, +and for having (in spite even of his brethren the apostles) desired in +favour of the Gentiles the abolition of the Jewish customs, that Paul +was persecuted, the priests were doubtless irritated against a man who +sought to abrogate a law and a priesthood which a divine revelation had +so many times taught them was to endure eternally, whilst the authors of +the Epistle to the Hebrews formerly assures us that they have been set. +aside by the Gospel. + + + + +CHAPTER XVI. St. Paul's Hypocrisy + +We cannot avoid perceiving still more of the insincerity and profound +hypocrisy of Paul's conduct at Jerusalem. After having preached in a +great number of towns in Asia and Greece, a doctrine revolting to the +feelings of the Jews, and which every where caused disturbances amongst +them, after having in favour of the Gentiles abolished circumcision so +particularly ordained by the law of Moses, and deemed so essential to +the proselytes of the gate; we see this great Apostle, by the advice +of his brethren, submit himself, during seven days, to the Jewish +ceremonies; purify himself with affectation. "Then Paul took the men, +and the next day purifying himself with them, entered into the temple, +to signify the accomplishing of the days of purification, until that +an offering should be offered for every one of them*." But the Jews of +Asia, who knew the real sentiments of our missionary, from having heard +him preach when amongst them, were not the dupes of his hypocrisy: they +excited the people "crying out, men of Israel, help: this is the man +that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the laws of +this place; and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath +polluted this holy placet.**" These were the true charges of the Jews +against Paul, and without denying what we find in the Acts of the +Apostles, we must acknowledge, that they were well founded. + + * Acts of Apostles, chap. xxi. ver. 6. + + ** Acts of Apostles, chap. xxi. ver. 28. + +What should we say in the present day of a bishop, who, whilst +pretending to be a Christian, should go for a period of seven days into +a synagogue in London or Amsterdam, to fulfil Jewish ceremonies in the +sight of the public? We should not fail to regard him as an apostate, +or a knave, who had sinister intentions at any rate, the most favourable +construction, we would put upon his motives, would be to suppose him +a fool. We are however to admire this conduct in Paul, he pretends to +justify himself by the necessity of becoming all things to all men. It +is thus we see that hypocrisy, falsehood, and imposture, are legitimate +means, by which to advance the cause of God and gain souls. + +Nevertheless there is every reason to think that St. Paul in acting in +such a singular manner, had his own interest and safety, more at heart +than the cause of the divinity. His conduct has been faithfully copied +by a great number of Christian missionaries, and especially by the +Jesuits, whom their adversaries often reproach with having frequently +assimilated the worship of Jesus with that of those idolatrous people, +whom they were endeavouring to convert. + + + + +CHAPTER XVII. St. Paul accused of Perjury, or the Author of the Acts of +the Apostles, convicted of Falsehood. + +Not contented with pursuing this oblique or hypocritical conduct, we +again see, our great Apostle, evidently, wilfully guilty of perjury, +or a false oath. To convince ourselves of this we have only to read the +commencement of his Epistle to the Galatians; to prove to them, that the +gospel which he announced to them; was divinely inspired, he says "But +certify to you brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me, is +not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught +it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ." Further on he proves what he +advances by saying, "But when it pleased God, who separated me from my +mother's womb, and called me by his grace, to reveal his son in me, that +I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with +flesh and blood; neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were +apostles before me but I went into Arabia, and returned again into +Damascus. Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, +and abode with him fifteen days. But other of the apostles, saw I none, +save James the Lord's brother. Now the things which I write unto you +behold before God I lie not*." But if Paul did not lie, in what he +related to the Galatians, it is clear that the author of the Acts of the +Apostles, whom the Christian church regards as an inspired writer +equally with St. Paul, has lied. In fact in the ninth chapter of the +Acts, it is said that Paul after his conversion, and after having +recovered his sight remained some days with the disciples who were at +Damascus; which proves that he was instructed by men, or that he took +counsel of flesh and blood. Believing himself sufficiently fortified in +his theology, by Ananias or others, he began to preach Christ in the +synagogue, at which conduct the Jews were so shocked that they sought to +take away his life: but Saul escaped from their fury by means of a +basket, and without mention made of his journey to Arabia, he directly +returns to Jerusalem, where the disciples were in the first instance +fearful of him, but Barnabas, encouraged them, and presented him to the +apostles, at the same time relating to them his miraculous conversion, +and his courageous preaching at Damascus. In consequence it is said that +Paul was added to the number of the faithful. (Acts ix). + + * This passage proves very forcibly that Paul preached a + different gospel from that of the other apostles, i. e. + from the Ebionites or Nazarenes. + +It is easy to see, how little this recital of the inspired historian +of the Acts, agrees with that of the inspired Apostle, who wrote to the +Galatians, and confirmed his narration by an oath. Besides the journey +of St. Paul to Arabia upon leaving Damascus, and which preceded his +arrival at Jerusalem by three years, becomes very improbable, as well as +his stay in this country. In fact the disciples at Jerusalem must have +been in habits of correspondence with those of Damascus, consequently +they would thus have heard of an event so interesting to their sect, +as the conversion of St. Paul and the pains he took to propagate their +doctrines; thus the presence of our Apostle would not have created any +uneasiness, and there could have been no need of Barnabas becoming his +surety. It appears then that the new convert upon leaving Damascus went +directly to Jerusalem, that he had there an opportunity of conversing +with the apostles, and that his theology was not intuitive. + +But even supposing that the journey and sojourn of three years in +Arabia, really took place, it would be no less certain that Paul took a +false oath to the Galatians, or that the author of the Acts is deceived. +In fact St. Paul writes that at the end of three years he returned to +Jerusalem to visit Peter, and that he remained fifteen days with him +without seeing any other of the apostles. This is quite at variance +with the author of the Acts, who informs us that Paul being come to +Jerusalem, sought to join himself to the disciples, who were afraid of +him, not knowing that he was a disciple. Our Saint contradicts all this +by a different tale which he confirms by an oath. + +Moreover by this oath Paul himself contradicts the discourse which the +author of the Acts, puts into his mouth in the presence of King Agrippa, +of Queen Berenice, and the governor Festus*. + +In relating to them his conversion, he says to them, Whereupon, O King +Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision; but shewed +first unto them at Damascus and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the +coasts of Judea, and then to the Gentiles that they should repent and +turn to God, and do works meet for repentance. Thus according to the +author of the Acts, St. Paul himself acknowledges that he first +preached at Damascus, then at Jerusalem before addressing himself to the +Gentiles. + +If he had preached during a period of three years in Arabia, he would +have spoken of the circumstance, of which no mention is made in all the +Acts of the Apostles, whilst we find there the most minute details of +the continual journeyings. + +We shall just remark here a visible contradiction in the Acts of the +Apostles; The author of this work in relating the miraculous conversion +of St. Paul, says that those who accompanied him, were speechless, +hearing a voice but seeing no man**. However the same author, forgetting +himself makes Paul say in his discourse to the Jews, "And they that were +with me saw indeed the light and were afraid, but they heard not the +voice of him that spake to me***". + +It belongs to the impartial reader to judge what degree of confidence is +due to writers who are so often at variance. In the first instance Paul +solemnly attests by an oath, the truth of a fact, not only omitted, but +even formally contradicted by St. Luke, his historian and disciple. In +the second instance the historian contradicts himself. This ought at +least to shake the implicit faith, that so many persons put in works +which possess neither the consistence nor harmony required in ordinary +writers. As to our doctors they tell us their ways of saving the honour +of these two inspired ones; whom they have much interest in washing from +so grave an accusation, and such a taint upon the Christian religion. + + * Acts, xxvi. ver. 29. + + **Acts, ix. ver. 7. + + ***Acts, xxii. ver. 9. + + + + +CHAPTER XVIII. Examination of St. Paul's Miracles + +Though St. Paul as we have just seen, has himself taken care to shake +the credit of the author of the Acts of the Apostles, it is nevertheless +on the word of this writer that Christians think themselves obliged to +believe in the miracles of our great Apostle. In fact, like all those +who have endeavoured to establish new sects, our preacher could not +dispense with performing prodigies: this is the most certain method +of exciting tbe admiration of the vulgar. Incapable of reasoning, of +judging of the soundness of a doctrine, and frequently unable in the +least to comprehend it, miracles always become the most powerful of +arguments; they are indubitable proofs that he who works them is the +favourite of the divinity, that consequently he cannot be in the wrong, +nor capable of a wish to deceive. + +Miracles were more especially necessary amongst the Jews; they demanded +signs from all those who spoke to them in the name of the Lord, and +there was little difficulty in working them, before an ignorant and +credulous people, ready to receive as such every thing that was shewn to +them. In spite of a disposition so favourable to miracle-mongers, we +do not find that those of Jesus himself and afterwards of his apostles, +produced on the Jews those effects which we have a right to expect from +them. We find that at the time they were performed they convinced nobody +and drew those who worked them, into difficult situations. It was +not until a long time had elapsed that these prodigies produced their +effects, and by a miracle that we can never cease to admire, we find, +that these prodigies, which were discarded by those who saw them, were +most firmly believed by those who did not see them, and are now ranked +amongst the strongest evidences of the divinity of tbe Christian +religion. There are only some reasoners who persist in judging of these +ancient miracles in the same manner as the contemporaries who did +not see them, or who, if they did see them, regarded them as so many +instances of deception and slight of hand, incapable of imposing on +them. It is only the simplicity, of faith, that is to say, an implicit +confidence in the assertions of our guides, which can make us see +miracles, or cause us to believe in those we have not seen. But this +simple faith is the effect of an especial grace that God grants only to +those who are poor in spirit, and harshly refuses to those who think and +reason. As soon as we want confidence in the operators, we see no more +miracles, or at least we doubt of those that are shewn to us. + +It does not appear that St. Paul performed miracles at Jerusalem after +his conversion; this city was not in his department: it belonged to St. +Peter and the other Jewish apostles, who, according to the Acts, did not +cease to work miracles there. Our Apostle of the uncircumcised, or of +the district in which the Gentiles were converted, having quitted his +brethren, commenced his course of miracles at Paphos. He was upon the +point of converting Sergius, proconsul of the province, had not a cursed +sorcerer of a Jew, named Barjesus, and surnamed Elymas, i.e. magician, +endeavoured to prevent the magistrate from believing in Jesus Christ. +Indignant at the obstacle that this man opposed to the divine will, +instead of converting and convincing him, Paul abused him according +to the present practice of theologians, and called him a child of the +devil, and finished with striking him with blindness. If this conduct +was conducive to the salvation of the proconsul, who according to the +author of the Acts, having seen this miracle, believed, being astonished +at the doctrine of the Lord, there are many who will not be so edified, +at this prodigy, so contrary to Christian charity and mildness. In fact +would it not have been more kind of St. Paul armed with divine power, +to have enlightened the eyes of the sorcerer's mind, than to have struck +those of his body with darkness? But we always see that the miracle +that the apostles as well as their divine master had most difficulty in +working was that of convincing those who were not disposed to believe +every thing. + +It appears that on the present occasion, the sorcerer was stronger, in +point of reasoning, than St. Paul, which put him in a passion. Logic was +not in fact, the most prominent quality in our Apostle, any more than +in his brethren and successors. Besides, this holy Missionary was of too +impetuous a temper to reason with moderation, and argue in a clear and +precise manner. Thus to terminate the dispute with Elymas, he abused +him, and perhaps relying on the protection of the proconsul, whom he saw +wavering in favour of his doctrine, ventured to strike his antagonist, +which deprived him of his sight for a period, for it is easy to deprive +a man of the use of his eyes without a miracle*. + + * This, it must in candour be acknowledged, is an inference + which the text will not warrant us to draw, and is unworthy + Boulanger's pen. It seems to be compromising the dignity + of truth, to impose upon itself the necessity of accounting + for all the hocus pocus tricks, or wilful falshoods, which + the ignorance, bigotry, and knavery of a deplorable + superstition, have handed down through the mist of eighteen + centuries.--Translators + +We learn that our Apostle and his associate Barnabas, wrought such +miracles at Iconiura, that all the city was divided, one part being +in favour of the Jews, and the other for the Apostles. But immediately +after we are informed, that "when there was an assault made, both of +the Gentiles and also of the Jews, with their rulers, to use them +despite-fully, and to stone them, the Apostles were aware of it, and +fled to Lystra and Derbe." + +This conduct of the inhabitants of Iconiura is certainly inconceivable. +Pagans and Jews unite to ill treat and stone our Apostles, who in spite +of the divine power which they possess have no other expedient, than to +seek safety in flight. + +In spite of the inutility of his miracles, Paul worked more at Lystra; he +there cured a lame man, in whom by mere inspection he discovered much +faith. This gives rise to a suspicion that this might have been a +miracle concerted between them. He said to him, with a loud voice, stand +upright on thy feet, and he leaped and walked. The people of Lystra +were so struck by this prodigy, that they took our two missionaries +for gods, and would have offered them sacrifices, but Paul and Barnabas +forbade them with great modesty. This great miracle must have been +believed, even by the priest of Jupiter, since it is said, that he +brought oxen and garlands unto the gates, and would have sacrificed with +them. This circumstance clearly proves that nobody at Lystra doubted the +truth of this miracle. However some Jews who had arrived from Iconium +were able to undeceive a whole city, which had seen the miracle of the +lame man. The poor St. Paul, who had just before been taken for Jupiter, +was stoned, and dragged out of the city for dead; he revived, however, +and, in spite of his miracle, he saved himself, with Barnabas by fleeing +to Derbe. + +The miracle wrought by our saint at Philippi in Macedonia, did not meet +with more success, he there cured a girl, who had a spirit of Python, +and being by that means possessed of the power of divination, gained +great profit to her masters. These, far from acknowledging and admiring +the power of a man who reduced to silence Apollo, one of the +most powerful gods of paganism, brought Paul and Silas before the +magistrates, and excited the people against them. It is right to +remark in this place, that Apollo (i. e. the Devil) who resided in this +prophetess, laboured to destroy his own empire. In fact having perceived +Paul and his comrade, the girl followed them, crying, these men are the +servants of the Most High God, which shew unto us the way of salvation. +And this did she many days. But Paul being grieved, turned and said to +the spirit, I command thee in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of +her, and he came out the same hour*. + +It is surprising that Paul was grieved at a declaration so favourable +to his mission, and that he should impose silence on a demon, whose +testimony was so honourable, and likely to draw adherents! but the +conduct of saints is always inexplicable. + +In these unhappy times in which faith is so cold, no credit is given, +either to those possessed, or to soothsayers; it is difficult to know +what the nature of the spirit of Python, which inhabited the Macedonian +girl could have been**. If we might hazard a conjecture on the subject, +it might be supposed that our Apostles, to give themselves some relief, +gained her over, and employed her to play her part, by giving her to +understand that it would be her interest to attach herself to the new +sect, rather than work for masters, who, probably, paid her very poorly +for her services from which they drew all the profit. + + * Acts xvi. 17, 18. + + ** Some critics have been very much embarrassed, to + conjecture what the nature of this spirit of Python could + have been: several have thought that those who had this + spirit, were such as are known to us in the present day by + the name of ventriloquists, who have the power of + articulating words, more or less distinctly, without any + motion of the lips being perceptible. There are such + persons, who create much surprise to those unacquainted with + this faculty, and we cannot be astonished that the vulgar, + who doat upon the marvellous, should attribute this power to + supernatural causes. + +The magistrates of Philippi on the complaint of those masters, as we +have seen, caused our exorcists to be flogged, and sent them to prison. +An earthquake happened very opportunely, the jailor was gained over +or converted; the magistrates, thinking the Missionaries had been +sufficiently punished, permitted them to depart; but then, as we have +seen, they declared themselves Roman citizens, and refused to go, until +the magistrates, who were now intimidated, consented to make them an +honourable reparation. + +Notwithstanding the miracles wrought by Paul during his mission, +disagreeable reports every where accompanied him, or followed him, so +closely in all the cities through which he passed, that neither himself +nor his comrades could remain long in the same place. They only passed +through Amphipolis and Apollonia, and repaired to Thessalonica, where, +in a very short time, the whole city was in an alarm. Jason, their +host, was, as we have already seen, ill treated on their account, it was +alleged against our Missionaries, that they overthrew every thing, and +in preaching another king than Caesar, seemed desirous of plotting a +conspiracy. In consequence of this, as it was a serious accusation, the +brethren contrived the escape of Paul and Silas during the night. + +Arrived at Berea, our two adventurers, soon excited similar +disturbances. Paul repaired to Athens, where the philosophers who heard +him, took him for a talker whose brain was unsound. However in spite of +his success, which was doubtless very slow, he had the mortification of +being compelled to labour at his original trade of tent-making, which +was very hard for a preacher ordained to live by the altar, that is to +say, one whose trade it was to sell spiritual wares, to those who +bound themselves to provide him, wherewith to subsist on credit Such is +clerical traffic. Further, St. Paul takes special care to boast to the +Corinthians of his great disinterestedness. He makes them understand he +would not be chargeable upon them; by which he appears to have intended +some indirect reproaches, calculated to pique their pride and +excite their generosity, towards the holy man who laboured for their +salvation*. The Corinthians probably imagined that men who performed +miracles, had no need of assistance: but our miracle-mongers were under +the necessity of satisfying their wants by ordinary methods. They were +like the adepts, who were always in poverty though offering to others +the secret of making gold. + +There is reason to believe that Paul performed great miracles amongst +the Corinthians, at least he says to them himself "Truly the signs of +an apostle, were wrought among you in all patience, in signs and wonders +and in mighty deeds**." However we find that these miracles had not yet +sufficiently convinced the Corinthians, since Paul says to them "Seek ye +a proof of Christ speaking in me, which to you ward is not weak, but is +mighty in you***." + + * See 2. Corinthians, chap. xi. ver. 7, 8, 9, 16. Chap. xii. + ver. 13, and also 1. Corinthians chap. ix. ver 11,13, 14, + + ** 2 Corinthians xii. 12. + + *** 2 Corinthians xiii. 3. + +Respecting the miracles wrought by St. Paul at Corinth, we have only his +own evidence, and that is sufficient; the author of the Acts though very +free upon this article does not inform us, that he wrought any in this +city, this was most likely the case, since he remained there a long +time, an unusual circumstance, where he condescended to perform +miracles, which generally compelled him to remove, in consequence of the +disturbance they excited. He was obliged to quit Ephesus, where we are +assured, that he performed a great number, and where handkerchiefs, +linen, &c. which had touched him, cured the sick, and expelled devils. +He departed from Troas directly after having raised a dead man to life, +or at least after having asserted that a young man, who was thought so, +was in reality not so. In short in the isle of Malta he cured himself of +the bite, either because the reptile had not in fact bitten him, or +by applying fire to the wound, a remedy which though common, might be +unknown to the inhabitants of the island, as we have already remarked. + + + + +CHAPTER XIX. Analysis of the writings attributed to St. Paul + +After having examined the character of St. Paul by His conduct, it will +be proper to make some reflections on his writings; they will serve +to place in a still clearer light, this celebrated man, to whom +Christianity owes so many obligations. If we confine ourselves to those +works attributed to him, the Apostle of the Gentiles must have been a +very extraordinary compound of discordant qualities, which when united +must have produced an inexplicable whole. He himself informs us, that he +had within him two men, the new man and the old man; the just man, and +the sinner. He had two bodies, the one natural and the other spiritual; +the body of sin and death, and the body of justification and life. He +had within him, two laws, which regulated his actions, the law of sin, +and the law of justice, the law of the flesh, and the law of the spirit. +Never was poor mortal so perplexed and teazed, than was our Apostle +according to his own account, by these two opposite laws, which he had +within himself. The carnal man makes him say, (see Romans, chapter vii. +verse 18, to the end of the chapter.) + +In other places the spiritual man, makes him hold another language, he +assures the Galatians, that he is one with Christ and crucified with him +(see Galatians. chapter vii. verse 19 and 20.) In another place he says +to the Romans. "For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath +made me free from the law of sin and death." It is clear that this +duplicity of nature and law in St. Paul as acknowledged by himself +is calculated to throw us into much embarrassment. In fact how can we +distinguish in his conduct or discourse, that which springs from the +old, from that which arises from the new man, or the spirit of life and +the grace of Christ? Is it very easy at this time, to determine which +governed St. Paul in those moments in which he spoke, acted, or wrote? +Perhaps those maxims and dogmas most admired by Christians have been the +suggestions of the flesh, the fruits of the old man, and that this old +man often influenced his conduct, which, as we have shewn was not at all +times free from reproach. In short the acknowledgments are of a nature +well calculated to plunge the most firm Christians into uncertainties +from which, without supernatural assistance, they will have great +difficulty in extricating themselves. These confessions may further +serve to shew us the inconsistencies, contradictions, absurdities, the +sophistry and superficial reasoning, and disjointed ideas, which we meet +with at every page of the writings attributed to St. Paul. It is to +be presumed, that it is the Holy Ghost, or Christ, who speaks when he +appears reasonable, it would be blasphemous to say or think, that they +could talk nonsense: in this case we shall say, that it is St. Paul +or the flesh, who speaks, when we find him using bad arguments, +extravagancies, and unintelligible nonsense. We cannot imagine that the +spirit of God would have made him utter contradictions, or inspired him +with a language incomprehensible to those whom he designed to enlighten +and instruct by the mouth of this Apostle. In fact, St. Peter himself +complains of the obscurities of Paul's epistles, in which, says he, "are +some things hard to be understood."* + + * 2 Epis. Peter, chap. iii. ver. 16 + +The distinction which we have just made will enable us to judge of the +works of St. Paul, and explain the obscurities which we find in them, +as well as the continual variations, which we must remark in his +principles. He tells the Galatians that he was angry with Peter, and +withstood him to his face, and that he was offended, with the other +apostles, because they temporized and used dissimulation, sometimes +advocating the usages of the Jews, and at others the customs of the +Gentiles*. + +Elsewhere he says (here see 1 Corinthians, chap. ix. ver. 19 to 22.) +According to these passages, is it right to temporize, or not? It +remains for our doctors to decide which of these two principles has been +divinely inspired to St. Paul, and in which of them we ought to imitate +this great Saint. Our doctors however are not much in the habit of +temporizing with their enemies unless they find themselves, too weak to +cope with them. + +Our Apostle declares, formally to the Galatians that circumcision, +is useless and will avail them nothing, he says the same thing to the +Corinthians, Yet we find him circumcising his dear Timothy, and he tells +the Romans that circumcision is useful to those who fulfil the law. + +He writes to Timothy, that God is the saviour of all men expecially of +the faithful, which evidently supposes that the unfaithful, will not +be excluded from Salvation. He had also said, that God willed that all +should be saved. But speaking to the Romans, he will not allow that the +gates of Paradise, shall be opened to all the world**. + + * Galatians chap. ii. ver. 11, &c. + + ** Romans, chap. xi. ver. 7. + +We should never finish, were we to relate all the contradictions which +are to be found in the writings attributed to St. Paul. It is clear +that if he be really the author of them, he exhibits himself to us, as a +fanatical writer, whose disordered head prevents him from seeing that +he is eternally contradicting himself. He says that black is white. +He follows only the impulses of a heated imagination; he establishes +principles to destroy them immediately; in a word from his want of +logic, and the little connexion of his ideas without a most lively faith +we should suspect, that he was in a continual state of delirium. + +It cannot be denied that this great Saint was of a temperament too +ardent to allow him to reason connectedly, or to speak with coolness. +The tumultuous ideas which presented themselves in crowds to his +brain, did not permit him to put them into any thing like an orderly +arrangement; he incessantly wandered from his subject, so much so that +an imagination, as warm as his own, is necessary in order to follow +him in his flights. Perpetually involved in figures, allusions +and allegories, it is nearly impossible to guess what are his real +sentiments. According to his doctrine he appears to establish in the +strongest manner the dreadful doctrine of absolute predestination and +reprobation. According to him God grants grace to whom he pleases, +and whom he pleases he hardens. If we demand how this doctrine can +be reconciled with the goodness and justice of God; or how a God who +operates in man the will and the deed, can be offended with the wills +and actions of men? He extricates himself by asking if the vessel shall +say to him who made it, why hast thou fashioned me thus? Thus St. Paul, +and after him all Christian doctors, explain the conduct of a God, +whom they pretend to love, at the same time that they hold him up as +a tyrant, who is not accountable for his most unjust caprices, and +despot-like is restrained by no rule! + +St. Paul being divinely inspired should have taught us something of the +nature of the soul, an object which so embarrasses alt philosophers who +not being illumined from above, have formed ideas upon this subject, +so much at variance with those of our Christian doctors. But far from +throwing any light upon this important matter, our Apostle, who appears +strongly tinctured with the platonic philosophy so universally taught in +his time, distinguishes the body, soul and spirit, and thus obscures the +thing still more. But it is the essense of theology to confound +every thing, and the interest of theologians to plunge mankind into a +labyrinth, from which nothing but faith can extricate them. + + + + +CHAPTER XX. Of Faith, in what this Virtue consists + +Generally speaking it is St. Paul, or the author of the Epistles, +(wherever he be) that are attributed to him, that ought to be regarded +as the true founder of Christian theology. The mysterious obscurity +of his works, the tone of fanaticism which reigns in them, and the +unintelligible oracles with which they are filled, render them well +suited to impose on the vulgar, who respect things only in proportion +as they are impossible to be comprehended. Devout enthusiasm and pious +melancholy there finds a continual feast for its sickly brain. Oracles +and enigmas are taken for divine mysteries, which without a strong +dose of faith we should conclude were the production of delirium or the +inventions of imposture, which seeks to put reason to flight. Reason had +no means of examining ideas which are totally unreasonable; thus they +persuaded men that it was necessary to renounce reason in order +to become a good Christian. In consequence of this principle, so +humiliating to mankind and derogatory to the character of a God, the +author of reason, it was no longer permitted to examine anything; +man was commanded blindly to subscribe to the most incomprehensible +reveries, and it was considered meritorious to renounce common sense +and adopt fables and opinions revolting to every thinking being. Thus +delirium was changed into wisdom, deception into truth, and frequently +crime became virtue. They closed the mouths of reasoners by citing the +language of Paul, who had said "that the foolishness of God is wiser +than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men." According to +the same Apostle God himself had predicted by the mouth of a prophet, +the revolution that Christianity was to produce in the minds of mankind. +"I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the +understanding of the prudent." Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? +where is the disputer of this world? Hath not God made foolish the +wisdom of this world, &c.* And he concludes by saying, "But we preach +Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling block, and unto the Greeks +foolishness." + + * 1 Corinth, chap. i. ver. 19. + +However violent Paul's enthusiasm may have been, he well knew how odd +the doctrine he preached, must appear to reasonable beings. He must have +been aware, that it overturned all received ideas; that it would not +bear the test of examination; that it was a difficult enterprise to +persuade sensible beings that a God could die, that this God had arisen +again, that an immutable God had changed and annulled the eternal +alliance he had made with the Jews, and which been so repeatedly +confirmed with oaths, &c. Thus our Apostle in order to pass such +improbable opinions, believed it requisite, to substitute folly in the +place of reason, and to fortify his disciples against the weapons of +logic. For the evidence which results from the testimony of the senses +be substituted faith, which according to him is the evidence of things +not seen, and evidence which can only be founded on the most stupid +credulity. + +Thus this prudent orator took care to guard against the philosophy of +common sense, and against all science, seeing clearly that they opposed, +invincible obstacles to the religion that he sought to establish, and of +which he pretended to be the soul and chief. Hence we find he attached +the greatest merit to faith, that is to say, to a blind submission to +his authority; and such an unbounded confidence in himself as prevented +any doubt of those things, the truth of which he attested. + +As science was injurious to the establishment of his empire he decried +it. "Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth." By charity, we may +here understand that affection to a spiritual director which closing +the eyes against those defects, which in common with other men he may +possess, convinces us that he is always right, that he is incapable +of the wish to deceive, and in short, that he ought to be believed in +preference to the evidence of our senses. + +It is thus that this great Apostle laboured incessantly to establish his +own authority on the ruins of wisdom, reason, and science. However we +may reply to his doctrine, so useful to those whose interest it is +to maintain absurd opinions and incredible fables, that God who, is, +according to them, the author of reason could not have destroyed his own +work. We shall demand of St. Paul and of those who like him preach +up implicit faith, if folly is more able than wisdom to attain to the +knowledge of God? We shall ask of them, if God has given wisdom to men +on condition of their never using it, and if it is not by the aid of +human wisdom, that man gains some idea of the divine wisdom? We shall +ask if God can, without absolutely changing the nature of things, make +wisdom folly, and folly wisdom? In short we shall ask them, if in order +to become a Christian it is necessary to renounce common sense, or how +far our folly must prevail to have a religion? + +To all these questions theologians, faithfully treading in the steps +of St. Paul, will reply, that we must believe, and that as soon as they +speak, we must submit to their authority. "Faith" says Paul "comes +by hearing," whence it results that have faith, we must sacrifice our +reason, to the wills of our spiritual pastors. Charity ought to convince +us, that these infallible guides, can neither deceive nor desire to lead +us into error. + +According to this firm persuasion we shall never be embarrassed, unless, +by chance, those pastors should happen to disagree in their opinions. +This however often occurs in the church, and has done from the +commencement. In fact we have seen St. Paul himself resist St. Peter to +his face and differ from him in opinion. Their quarrels like many others +had fatal results, and produced a true schism between the partizans of +Peter, and those of Paul, the Apostle of the Gentiles. + +The latter has acknowledged himself, that there must be heresies in +a church, perpetually guided by the most high. This prophecy has been +verified in the Christian religion, which from its foundation has been +incessantly agitated by quarrels, divisions, animosities, troubles, and +paroxysms of fury mat would induce a belief, that the gospel was given +to nations only to excite in them, fermentations unknown to Paganism, +and show them to what a degree of madness credulity could lead. + +The writings of Paul especially have furnished in all ages ample matter, +for disputes to the Christian doctors. The obscure dogmas they contain, +have of necessity been diversely understood by profound dreamers, who +have passed their time in meditation. Each pretended to have discovered +the true sense of this infallible and divinely inspired doctor. Each +found in his writings a confirmation of his own sentiments. Works filled +with contradiction continually gave rise to parties the most opposite to +each other, and virulently bent upon mutual destruction. The authority +of St. Paul was opposed to himself, and in the impossibility of deciding +upon questions totally out of the power of reason to discuss, recourse +was had to violence, and the strongest always made the weak feel, +that they alone comprehended the true sense of the great Apostle. They +disputed continually on predestination, on grace, and on the liberty +of man; they understood neither themselves nor St. Paul. The most +headstrong, the most wicked, and the most powerful, enforced their +opinions as the only ones which the Holy Ghost had dictated. + +To conclude, the incredulous, are not those, who alone find the writings +of Paul obscure and unintelligible, as we have seen in the the case +of St. Peter already quoted. If this prince of the Apostles founded +difficulties in the work of St. Paul, what shall we think of the +presumption of modern commentators when they pretend to explain to us, +the enigmatical and confused passages that we meet with in the epistles +of this doctor of the Gentiles. + + + + +CHAPTER XXI. Of the Holy Ghost, and Divine Inspiration + +It would however have been wiser in the first instance to examine into +the degree of confidence due to the real or pretended writings of this +wonderful man, whose history we have been developing. Before disputing +it would have been better to have been certain of the authority of an +Apostle whose works appear to us infallible only on his own word, or on +that of the written to whom we owe the Acts of the Apostles. In fact we +are told that St. Paul was inspired by the Holy Ghost. But what is the +Holy Ghost? How can it inspire a man? What certainty have we that it has +ever inspired anyone? By what signs shall we distinguish these invisible +inspirations? As it is upon these inspirations only that the Christian +religion is established, these questions are well worth the trouble of +being discussed. + +There is no mention made of the Holy Ghost in the Old Testament; there +is mention made of the spirit of the Lord, which possessed, or resided +in the prophets, and other holy personages charged with speaking to the +Jewish people; but in no place of the Old Testament is the Holy Ghost +announced as a being distinct from the Divinity, it is only in the New +Testament that we find this metaphysical being deified, or this divine +breath personified. In fact it is only in the history of Jesus Christ, +that the Holy Ghost begins to perform, a part; we there find him +commissioned to overshadow Mary, and produce the savour of the world, +who was, as we are told, begotten by the operation of the Holy Ghost. + +This same Holy Ghost descended in the form of a dove upon Jesus Christ +at the moment of his baptism in the river Jordan by John the Baptist. +In the Gospel according to St. John, the author of which appears to have +drawn his ideas from the platonic philosophy, there is much talk of the +Holy Ghost which is never defined. Jesus promises to send him to the +disciples when he himself shall have left them. This spirit is described +under term of the Paraclete or Comforter. Jesus assures them that he +proceeded from the father, and that he will send him on the part of the +father, to bear witness of him Jesus. Further on he promises them, that +when this spirit shall come, he shall guide them into all truth. + +According to the promise of Jesus, this comforter did in fact descend +upon the Apostles at the feast of Pentecost, see Acts ari. ver. 2, 3, +13. Many were astonished at the prodigy there related, but it seems not +to have convinced others, who had probably less faith than the first. +These sceptics pretended that the inspired Apostles were drunken with +new wine. But Peter filled with the spirit, made them a long prophetic +harangue; which, according to the author of the Acts, produced a great +effect upon many of his hearers, who were converted upon the spot. + +In consequence of the descent of the Holy Ghost, the Apostles received +the power, not only of speaking divers tongues, but likewise of driving +out devils and performing miracles. However we do not find by their +history, though written by one favourable to their cause, that the +Holy Ghost gave them the power to cast out the demon of incredulity, +especially from tbe minds of the Jews; these resisted constantly the +Holy Ghost and made those who said they were filled with it, to suffer +cruel treatment. + +Tbe Apostles had not only received the Holy Ghost, but they had also +received the power of communicating it to others by the imposition of +hands. It is difficult, without a submissive faith, to conceive a clear +idea of this invisible communication of tbe Holy Ghost, or the manner +in which an indivisible spirit, divides itself among so many +different individuals. However it is not allowed us to doubt that +this transmission of tbe Holy Ghost has been perpetuated down from the +Apostles to our time. It is still by imposition of hands that the guides +of the Christian Church receive the Holy Ghost, and the right to teach. +If our bishops and and priests who represent in our eyes the Apostles +and disciples, have not received the gift of tongues and miracles they +have, at least, received the faculty of pretending, that the Holy Ghost +does not cease to illuminate them, in their frequently contradictory +decisions, which ought to be regarded as a great prodigy. + +A Christian would run the risk of being damned if he should dare to +doubt, that the Holy Ghost invisibly presided in the church and will +reside in the brains of its chiefs until the consummation of all things. +What can be more calculated to inspire us with regard and respect for +those, who themselves assure us, that they are the living temples of +the Holy Ghost. In gratitude for these advantages which the Holy +Ghost procured to the ministers of the Christian religion, they felt +themselves bound to deify him. It was tbe least they could do for a +being from whom their power clearly emanated. In fact if the Holy Ghost, +charged with inspiring the church had not been a God, the authority of +the church might have been contested. But it being clearly decided, +that the Holy Ghost is a God, men are no longer permitted to dispute his +rights; it only remains to them to subscribe blindly to tbe decisions of +those whom he has chosen for his organs; to contradict them, would be to +revolt against God. + +We see then how important it was to tbe heads of the church to +apotheosise the Holy Ghost. It was necessary to make him a God at +any rate; otherwise the church would not have been infallible, its +infallibility being founded, solely on the continued inspirations of the +Holy Ghost; and that he himself should be infallible, it was necessary +that he should be a God. Thus the church has wisely made the God which +makes her infallible. + +However useful this deification was to the church, it was attended with +some difficulties. In fact how could they reconcile this new God, this +Mercury, this messenger of the father and son, with the unity of God? +To cut short all dispute upon so important a matter, the heads of the +church decided that the Holy Ghost proceeded from the father and son, +and yet made but one God with them. They closed the mouths of those +who cried out against this unintelligible oracle, by saying it was a +mystery, that man was made to adore and believe, without being able to +comprehend; they added that the church was infallible had thus decided, +that being inspired by the Holy Ghost (i.e. by a God) it was impossible +to avoid believing that she had the right to decide, that the Holy Ghost +was a God. + +This is sufficient to show us upon what the authority of church, and the +divinity of the Holy Ghost is founded. The church has deified the Holy +Ghost, and the divinity of the Holy Ghost serves as the basis of +the authority of the church. We thus see the true foundations of +Ecclesiastical power; we see the solidity of the titles of the church, +we see the true origin of the mystery of the trinity, now held in such +veneration by the faithful. In short we see what we ought to think of +the inspirations of the Holy Ghost from the time of its origin until +now. + + + + +CHAPTER XXII. Of the Inspiration of the Prophets of the Old Testament + +It does not appear, as we have already observed, that the Jews had +any precise ideas of the Holy Ghost similar to those of the Christian +theologians. Moreover there is reason to believe, that the Apostles had +not yet imagined such subtle notions of it, as the church has invented +since their time. Amongst the Hebrews, every man who, during his sleep, +had dreams, every enthusiast who had, or pretended to have visions, +believed himself inspired by the Lord, or at least gave himself out as +such. He regarded the fancies of his brain, as warnings from heaven; he +delivered his pious nonsense as oracles to credulous hearers, who did +not doubt for an instant, that the unintelligible delirium of these +harangues, was the effect of some divine illumination from the Almighty. +As in dreams, madness, in ebriation, in enthusiasm, man does not appear +master of himself, they believed that what he uttered in these divers +states must, of necessity, spring, from some supernatural force acting +in him, without his knowledge, and in spite of himself; the sentences +and discourse, which issued from his mouth, were regarded as +inspirations from on high, and received as divine commands. Their +obscurity only served to excite curiosity, redouble terror, and confuse +the imagination. It was supposed that God, who spoke by these demoniacs, +did not choose to express himself in a clearer manner. + +These reflections founded upon the nature of credulous, ignorant, and +superstitious men, may serve to fix our ideas of so many prophets and +jugglers, that we see play such a prominent part, not only in Jewish +history, but in all Pagan antiquity, and even among all savage and +uninformed people that are now scattered over the globe. The trade of +prophesying, appears to have been very lucrative and respectable amongst +the Jews, a people degraded by superstition, and whose priests always +took care to keep them in a state of profound ignorance, and credulity, +well-suited for the ends of those who sought to direct them after +their own fancies. Whoever desired to gain the attention of the Jews, +announced himself as inspired, threatened or promised them in the name +of the Lord, prophesied to them of evils calculated to intimidate, or +of happy events which seduced them into belief. To draw the attention of +the public, and frequently to produce revolutions in the state, it was +enough for a prophet to say gravely, that the Lord had spoken to him; +and assure them that heaven had intrusted him with its designs in a +vision; thus the brains of the Jews were put into a fermentation. The +Apostles desirous of establishing reform, or exciting a revolution, in +men's minds, felt the necessity of conforming to the prevailing liste of +the nation. In consequence they erected themselves into prophets, +gave themselves out for inspired, spoke in an obscure manner, uttered +oracles, predicted the end of the world, they preached a messiah, they +announced a kingdom in which their followers would enjoy a happiness, +which their subjugated country had long since been deprived of. In short +to prove the truth of their predictions, and the legitimacy of their +mission, they performed miracles, i.e. works calculated to astonish so +credulous a people as the Jews. + +The Jews, however, in spite of all their ignorance, did not suffer +themselves to be convinced by either the harangues and miracles of +Jesus, nor by the preachings and prodigies of his Apostles. All their +efforts failed against the hardness of heart of a people so often the +dupe of the numberless inspired who had so successfully deceived them. +There is then reason to think that Jesus and his disciples did not +perform their part well, or else that in their time, the Jews become +more cautious, had not so much faith as their ancestors had formerly +exhibited. Indeed we do not find that the first preachers of +Christianity made much impression upon their fellow citizens; they had +much more success, and Paul especially amongst idolators, for whom their +enthusiastic harangues, their preachings, and miracles was a more novel +spectacle. Amongst the Gentiles preaching was an unknown thing, the +people was held in disdain by the priests; each formed such ideas of +religion as he choose, there was no theological system that they were +compelled to adopt; in short, with the exception of Esculapius, the Gods +worked but few miracles for their worshippers. + +Thus, as we have already observed, circumstances were favourable for the +mission of our Apostle amongst the Gentiles; they were more disposed +to listen than the Jews, and to regard him who performed such wonders +before them, as an extraordinary man favoured by heaven. In fact St. +Paul gave himself out for such. And how can we doubt the veracity of a +man who performs miracles? It was then necessary to give him credit; +and without having seen these miracles we believe the same thing, and +especially his divine inspiration, upon the authority of the writings, +attributed to him, and upon the word of him who has transmitted to us +an account of his actions in the Acts of the Apostles, works which the +church enjoins us to regard as divinely inspired. It would be, I think, +useless to make any long reflections on the validity of the titles of +the church, and the right, that the writings which she has adopted have +to the claim of divine inspiration. It is enough to remark, that if we +admit those titles and rights, we have no reason to refuse also to admit +those of any man, or body of men, which shall give themselves out as +divinely inspired. If, on the word of Paul, we believe that he was +inspired, why shall we not have the same deference for the word of +Mahomet, who pretended to be the sent of the most high? If, after the +decision of the Christian church, we regard the books contained in +the New Testament as dictated by the Holy Ghost; what right have we to +refuse our assent to the decision of the body of Imans and Mollahs, +that the Koran was revealed by the angel Gabriel to Mahomet? if it be +permitted to one man, or body of men, to invest themselves with titles, +and at the same time forbid the titles to be investigated, we shall be +obliged to admit all the reveries, extravagancies, and fables that we +see spread over the various countries of the earth. Priests every where +show us books, which they say were inspired by the divinity, and weak +and silly people adore and and follow without examination books thus +announced. All religions in the world are founded upon sacred hooks +which contain the divine will, and whose truth is proved by miracles. + + + + +CHAPTER. XXIII. Of the Descent of the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles, or +their Divine Inspiration + +If we may believe the author of the Acts of the Apostles, the disciples +assembled at Jerusalem on the the day of Pentecost, were filled with the +Holy Ghost. But by what sign shall we be sure that they were filled with +the Holy Ghost? It is this that they began to speak divers languages. +But do these various languages prove the presence of the Holy Ghost? +Could not the disciples of Jesus speak these languages naturally? +However the Jews who had come from the different provinces of Asia to +Jerusalem to celebrate the feast all understood Hebrew, since it was +the language in which their law was written; nothing more then was +requisite but to speak Hebrew, in order to be understood by all of +them; we cannot suppose that men assembled at Jerusalem to celebrate the +Pentecost were Gentiles. That granted of what use was the gift tongues? +In supposing that among the Jews there were some who only understood +Greek, which was at that time universal over all Asia, it is very +possible that without a miracle, some of the disciples or Apostles, +might know this language by the aid of which they could make themselves +understood in most of the provinces mentioned in the Acts of the +Apostles. + +There is then reason for believing, that the Apostles and disciples +were on this occasion desirous of passing for inspired. With this view, +according to the practice of the diviners and prophets amongst +the Jews, they made noises contortions, cries, &c, and produced an +extravagant cacophony, which, many well disposed persons mistook for +undoubted sign of inspiration, while those who were less credulous took +them for certain proofs of drunkenness or folly. But St. Peter justified +them, and showed that what they received to be extravagancies ought to +be considered as proofs of inspiration. This he confirmed by quoting a +prophecy of the prophet Joel, (see Acts of Apostles, chap. ii. ver. 17.) + +But the question at issue is, whether visions, dreams, extravagancies, +&c. are signs of divine inspiration. It is true that from the contents +of the books, which Christians regard as dictated by the Holy Ghost, and +examining the nonsense and contradictions found in the writings of St. +Paul, we should be tempted to believe so. If the absence of reason, +probability, logic, and harmony, is the distinguishing mark of divine +inspiration, we cannot deny that St. Paul has proved himself, by his +writings, to have been divinely inspired. + +However at this rate nothing can be more easy than to pass; for +inspired. If madness be a sufficient qualification to cause a man to be +regarded as one filled with the Holy Ghost, there are many men who have +just pretensions to this faculty. If we doubt it they have only to +reply gravely that God hath confounded the wisdom of the wise; that our +rebellious reason ought to be submissive, that the human mind becomes +perverted by reasoning. Such is however the language continually +repeated by the supporters of St. Paul and Christianity. According to +them, wisdom is folly, reason an uncertain guide, common sense useless, +and contradictions are impenetrable mysteries, which we must adore +in silence; and when our mind loses itself in the abyss of folly and +imposture, they cry out with their great Apostle: "Oh! the depth of the +riches, both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are +his ways, and his judgments past finding out!" A lucky quibble of which +our theologians avail themselves with success, in order to escape from +the embarrassment into which they are thrown by any reasoning on the +ways of providence. + +It is thus that those who pretend to inspiration have the boldness to +outrage the Divinity, and make the Holy Ghost the accomplice of their +blasphemies. When they find it impossible to escape from the labyrinth +into which impostures and ill-contrived fables have led them, they make +God responsible for their extravagancies; they pretend that their +own follies are the effects of divine wisdom, they term their own +perplexities mysteries; and assent that the author of reason is at the +same time, the enemy of reason. + +Men however are not shocked by these impious propositions. Accustomed +to regard St. Paul as inspired, it never occurs to them that so great a +Saint may blaspheme. But what authority have Christians for their high +opinion of St. Paul? It is the Acts of the Apostles, that is to say upon +the suspected testimony of a partizan of Paul's sect, who has compiled +a history of his hero, filled with contradictions, but embellished with +prodigies and fable, which however serve to establish his romance. +But what proofs have we of these miracles themselves? We have no +other evidence than the word of the Romancer himself confirmed by +the authority of the church, i.e. of a body of men interested in +establishing the fable. + +It is true that we have in addition the testimony of St. Paul himself, +to whom are attributed the epistles in which are found a great number of +details of his life. But does this Apostle agree with his historian +in his own narrative? No, doubtless, they vary materially in many +circumstances, and frequently contradict each other in the most positive +manner. Who then shall we find to reconcile them, and show us what we +ought to think of a history so differently related? The church. But +what is the church? A body composed of the spiritual guides of the +Christians. Have these guides been witnesses of the actions and miracles +so differently related by Paul and his historian? No; they know nothing +of them but by a tradition, contested even in the times of the first +Christians, but since confirmed by a revelation of the Holy Ghost, who +never, according to them, ceases to enlighten his church. How are we +to know if the church is continually inspired? She herself says so, and +there is, she says, the greatest danger in doubting this. It would be to +resist the Holy Ghost who is identified with the church, and who makes +common cause with her; a crime which will never be forgiven either +in this world or in the next. Of all sins the most unpardonable is to +resist the clergy. + + + + +CHAPTER XXIV. General reflections on the foundations of Christian Faith, +and on the Causes of Credulity + +These then are the only foundations of faith! Christians are obliged to +believe that St. Paul was neither an enthusiast nor a cheat, because the +church has decided that he was divinely inspired: the church has decided +this important point of belief, according to the Acts of the Apostles +and epistles, which, as we have shown, were both rejected by many sects +of the primitive Christians, and which, as we have proved in the course +of this work, are filled with contradictions and absurdities. + +Nevertheless no Christian now dares to doubt of the authenticity of +these books. These works are regarded as sacred by the universal church, +by Christians of all sects, who with the exception notwithstanding of +some considerable and important variations, read them in the same manner +and entertain for them the same veneration. What can we oppose to this +unanimity? The example of Mahomet. This prophet who is at this day +equally revered by all sects of Mussulmen, was at first regarded as an +impostor at Mecca, whence he was compelled to fly. His Koran now +become the rule and code of a clergy, supported by princes and powerful +nations, was at first considered as a tissue of fables compiled by +imposture. This unanimity of the Mahometans, in acknowledging the +sanctity of Mahomet, and the divinity of the Koran proves no more in +their favour, than the agreement of all sects of Christians in admitting +the Saintship of Paul, and the inspiration of his writings, proves in +favour of the Apostle and his wonderful epistles. + +It is the property of habit to change the appearance of things, men by +degrees become familiar with that which at first disgusted them; time is +able to confound truth and falsehood; clearly proved deceptions, finish +by becoming undoubted facts to the ignorant, the idle, and those either +too much occupied, or involved in dissipation to examine, and these are +the majority of mankind. The most palpable imposture when it has existed +a length of time, acquires a solidity which nothing can shake: that +which has been believed by many for ages appears to have a real +foundation, and to have at least a claim to probability. When once time +has obliterated the traces of imposture, they are difficult to detect, +and most men find it easier to stick to received opinions than to +undergo the painful task of examining what they ought to think. + +Such are the true causes of the indolence that men generally show, +as often as they are called upon to give a reason for their religious +notions, they are contented to follow the current. Besides when +prejudice is supported by force, and becomes necessary to the interests +of a powerful body, it is dangerous to combat it, and few men have tbe +courage to oppose deceptions, approved by the world, and authorised by +the governing powers. + +On the other hand error, when habitual passes for truth, and is equally +agreeable. We hold fast to our vices and prejudices, the virtues and +opinions which are opposed to them, appear ridiculous or disagreeable. +It is this natural disposition of the human, species, which, by little +and little, imbue nations with the most extravagant opinions, absurd +fables, and ill-digested systems. + +No, artifice was; ever better imagined, nor trick was ever more +calculated to deceive the vulgar than that of divine inspiration. Upon +this is founded all the religions in tbe world; it is to this marvellous +invention that the priests of tbe whole earth are indebted for their +authority, their riches, and their existence. When a man tells us, +that he is divinely inspired, it is difficult for most men to ascertain +whether he lie, or speak the truth. God never contradicts those who +make him speak, on tbe contrary those impostors who deceive in his +name generally perform miracles and prodigies, and these miracles and +prodigies, are to tbe short sighted multitude undoubted signs of divine +favor. + +Shall we then judge those who are inspired by their conduct? They +generally take care to impose on us by their disinterestedness, +patience, and mildness of behaviour, and it can hardly be supposed that +such moderate men could have formed the design of deceiving or gaining +power. It is only when they have gently insinuated themselves into men's +minds, that we find ambition, avarice, and passions of the missionary +develope themselves: it is after having won over the multitude, that +their empire discovers itself; and they exact with pride, the tribute +and respect due to the organs of heaven, and the messengers of the most +high. + +These are the means by which Christianity has been established, the +manoeuvres have been practised by our great Apostle, and all those who +have assisted in disseminating his doctrine. His own experience +often made Paul sensible, that his pride and fiery disposition, were +frequently obstacles to his mission; thus we see him sometimes doa +violence to his character, take the air of mildness and humility, so +much better suited, to insinuate into mens good opinions than arrogance +and pride. He only assumes the tone of tbe master, when he knows his +ground; then he threatens, thunders, and displays his authority. Does +a dispute arise between himself and an associate? He resists him to his +face; he makes the church feel how necessary he is to the cause; and +avails himself of it, to exhibit his authority, His example has been at +all times faithfully followed by the heads of the Christian religion. +Humble, mild, patient, tolerant, and disinterested whenever they have +been weak, they become haughty, quarrelsome, intolerant, avaricious, +and rebellious subjects to princes whenever they were certain of their +empire over the people. It was then that they prescribed laws, crushed +their enemies, plundered the people, and caused kings to tremble at the +name of the God whose interpreters they declared themselves to be. + +The heads of the Christian religion have at all times made those +opinions, most comfortable to their own interest pass for divine +oracles. The Holy Ghost has had no other function, than to serve for a +cloak to their intrigues, passions, and pretensions. The works of our +Apostle furnished quarrelsome priests with arguments for injuring +each other; his disjointed reveries, his obscure mysteries, and his +ambiguous oracles, were an arsenal whence the most opposite parties +procured arms to combat incessantly. In short the writings inspired by a +God who was desirous of instructing mankind, have only served to plunge +nations in darkness. Guides enlightened by the Holy Ghost saw no clearer +than the ignorant, into mysteries, they continually presented to them by +an unintelligible system. These great doctors were agreed upon nothing, +each one sought to gain adherents whom he excited against the enemies +of his own opinions, which he regarded as those only approved by heaven. +Thence arose animosities, hatred, persecutions, and wars, which have +a thousand times spread trouble and desolation among Christians, blind +enough to follow men who pretended to be led by the Holy Ghost, while +it was evident, that the only spirit which inspired them, was that of +pride, ambition, obstinacy, vengeance, avarice, and rebellion. + + + + +CONCLUSION. + +Let us then be careful, oh! my friends, of allowing ourselves to be +guided by inspired persons. Deceivers, or enthusiasts, they will only +lead us into errors destructive of our peace. Let us consult reason, so +decried by men, whose interest it is to extinguish a light which is able +to show us the plots of their dark policy, this reason will inform us +that contradictory works do not merit our belief; that a turbulent, +ambitious and enthusiastic Apostle, may have been a very useful Saint to +the church, and a very bad citizen. This reason will convince us, that +a God filled with wisdom could never inspire men with systems, in which +folly is the most prominent feature; that a God who is the author of +reason could never have called for its immolation, before the shrine of +fable, and pretended mystery incapable of producing any thing but evil +and dissension upon the earth. Let us be just, benevolent, peaceable, +let us leave to St. Paul, and to those who take him for a model, their +lofty ambition, their turbulent fanaticism, their obstinate vanity, +their persecuting spirit, and above all things their bitter zeal, which +they term an interest for the salvation of souls. Let us show to all men +not an evangelic charity which is converted into fury and hatred, but +a real charity which inspires us with love, peace, indulgence, and +humanity. May this charity so much boasted of, and so little practised, +by St. Paul and his successors, be the rule of our conduct, and the +standard of our judgments on men and their opinions. Examine all +things, and hold fast that which is good. Let us not be blinded by the +prejudices, of infancy, of habit, or of authority. Let us not be imposed +upon by the pompous names of Paul, of Cephas, or of Apollos; but let +us seek the truth and follow reason, which can never lead astray, nor +render us troublesome members of society. + +FINIS. + + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Critical Examination of the Life of +St. Paul, by Boulanger + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EXAMINATION OF THE LIFE OF ST. PAUL *** + +***** This file should be named 38102.txt or 38102.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/8/1/0/38102/ + +Produced by David Widger + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. |
