diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:08:11 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:08:11 -0700 |
| commit | e582804bd6227a779532c0d95b6dda4da25f120b (patch) | |
| tree | 5d16d1bd005a628209fdaa839278732161ac03c5 /37531-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '37531-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 37531-h/37531-h.htm | 7835 |
1 files changed, 7835 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/37531-h/37531-h.htm b/37531-h/37531-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fb1d0db --- /dev/null +++ b/37531-h/37531-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,7835 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <head> + <!--utf-8 adopted to render Greek--> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of + Theology and the Social Consciousness, by + Henry Churchill King + </title> + + <style type="text/css"> + + p {margin-top: .75em; + text-indent: 1em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + + hr {width: 10%; + margin-top: 0.5em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; + } + + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {text-align: center; + font-weight: normal; + clear: both; + line-height: 100%;} + + body {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;font-size: 100%;} + + /* styles for front matter */ + .frontm {margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em; + text-align: center;} + .frontm span.size180 {font-size: 1.8em;} + .frontm span.size160 {font-size: 1.6em;} + .frontm span.size140 {font-size: 1.4em;} + .frontm span.size120 {font-size: 1.2em;} + .frontm span.size100 {font-size: 1.0em;} + .frontm span.size080 {font-size: 0.8em;} + .frontm span.size060 {font-size: 0.6em;} + + /* style for page numbers */ + .pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%; + font-size: small; text-align: right; } + + /* styles for signature block after preface */ + .sigbloc {margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%;} + .sigbloc span.name {display: block; margin-left: 0em; + padding-left: 3em; text-align: right;} + .sigbloc span.placedate {display: block; margin-left: 0em; + padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em; + font-size: small;} + + /* styles for ToC */ + .TOC {width: 60%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: 30%; + line-height: 120%; font-size: 90%;} + .TOC p.part {margin-top: 1.5em; text-align: center; + font-size: 120%;} + .TOC p.chapt {text-align: center; font-size: inherit;} + .TOC p.sumry {font-variant: small-caps; margin-left: 3em; + text-indent: -3em; font-size: inherit;} + .TOC ol.sectn {list-style-type: upper-roman;} + .TOC ol.ssectn {list-style-type: decimal;} + .TOC ul.sssectn {list-style-type: none;} + .TOC span.ralign {position: absolute; right:20%; text-align: right;} + + /* misc styles */ + .nodent {text-indent: 0;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + .small {font-size: small;} + .h90 {font-size: 90%;} + + /* footnotes at end of chapters*/ + .footnote {margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + font-size: 0.95em; + } + .footnote .label {position: absolute; + right: 84%; + text-align: right; + } + .fnanchor {vertical-align: super; + font-size: small; + text-decoration: none; + } + + /* styles for poems incl opening quote marks */ + .poem {margin-left:5%; + margin-right:10%; + text-align: left; + } + .poem span.iq {display: block; + margin-left: -0.3em; + padding-left: 3em; + text-indent: -3em; + } + + .poem span.i0 {display: block; + margin-left: 0em; + padding-left: 3em; + text-indent: -3em; + } + + /* styles for index */ + div.index {font-size: 90%;} + ul.IX {list-style-type: none; font-size: inherit;} + .IX li {margin-top: 0;} + + /* style for Transcriber's Note */ + .tnote {background-color: #EEE; color: inherit; + margin: 5% 15%; padding: 0.5em 1em; + border: dotted 1px gray; font-size: small;} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Theology and the Social Consciousness, by +Henry Churchill King + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Theology and the Social Consciousness + A Study of the Relations of the Social Consciousness to + Theology (2nd ed.) + +Author: Henry Churchill King + +Release Date: September 25, 2011 [EBook #37531] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: UTF-8 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THEOLOGY AND THE SOCIAL *** + + + + +Produced by Barbara Tozier, Chris Pinfield, Bill Tozier +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + +</pre> + + +<div class="frontm"> + <span class="size180">THEOLOGY AND THE<br /> + SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS</span> + <br /><br /> + <span class="size080">A STUDY OF THE RELATIONS OF THE<br /> + SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS TO THEOLOGY<br /><br /> + BY</span> + <br /><br /> + <span class="size120">HENRY CHURCHILL KING</span> + <br /> + <span class="size060">PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY<br /> + IN OBERLIN COLLEGE</span> + <br /><br /> + <span class="size100"><i>SECOND EDITION</i></span> + <br /><br /> + <span class="size120">HODDER & STOUGHTON<br /> + NEW YORK<br /> + GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY</span> +</div> +<hr/> +<div class="frontm"> + <span class="size080"><span class="smcap">Copyright, 1902</span></span> + <br /><br /> + <span class="size100"><span class="smcap">By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY</span></span> + <br /><br /> + <span class="size060">Set up and electrotyped September, 1902<br /> + Reprinted February, 1904;<br /> + July, 1907; August, 1910; April, 1912.</span> +</div> +<hr/> +<div class="frontm"> + <span class="size100"><b><i>To the Members of the<br /> + Harvard Summer School of Theology</i></b></span> + <br /><br /> + <span class="size080">OF THE YEAR 1901<br /> + IN RECOGNITION OF THEIR INTEREST IN THE LECTURES<br /> + THAT FORMED THE BASIS OF THIS BOOK</span> +</div> +<hr/> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_vii" +id="page_vii">{vii}</a></span></p> + +<h3>PREFACE</h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">There</span> is no attempt in this book to +present a complete system of theology, though much of such a system is +passed in review, but only to study a special phase of theological +thinking. The precise theme of the book is the relations of the social +consciousness to theology. This is the subject upon which the writer +was asked to lecture at the Harvard Summer School of Theology of 1901; +and the book has grown out of the lectures there given. In preparing +the book for the press, however, the lecture form has been entirely +abandoned, and considerable material added.</p> + +<p>The importance of the theme seems to justify a somewhat +thorough-going treatment. If one believes at all in the presence of +God in history—and the Christian can have no doubt here—he must be +profoundly <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_viii" +id="page_viii">{viii}</a></span> interested in such a phenomenon as +the steady growth of the social consciousness. Hardly any inner +characteristic of our time has a stronger historical justification +than that consciousness; and it has carried the reason and conscience +of the men of this generation in rare degree. Having its own +comparatively independent development, and yet making an ethical +demand that is thoroughly Christian, it furnishes an almost ideal +standpoint from which to review our theological statements, and, at +the same time, a valuable test of their really Christian quality.</p> + +<p>In attempting, then, a careful study of the relations of the social +consciousness to theology, this book aims, first, definitely to get at +the real meaning of the social consciousness as the theologian must +view it, and so to bring clearly into mind the unconscious assumptions +of the social consciousness itself; and then to trace out the +influence of the social consciousness upon the conception of religion, +and upon theological <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_ix" +id="page_ix">{ix}</a></span> doctrine. The larger portion of the book +is naturally given to the influence upon theological doctrine; and to +make the discussion here as pointed as possible, the different +elements of the social consciousness are considered separately.</p> + +<p>It should be noted, however, that the question raised is not the +historical one, How, as a matter of fact, has the social consciousness +modified the conception of religion or the statement of theological +doctrine? but the theoretical one, How should the social consciousness +naturally affect religion and doctrine? In this sense, the result +might be called, in President Hyde's phrase, a "social theology"; but, +as I believe that the social consciousness is at bottom only a true +sense of the fully personal, I prefer myself to think of the present +book as only carrying out in more detail the contention of my +<i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>—that theology should aim at a +restatement of doctrine in strictly personal terms. So conceived, in +spite of its casual origin, this book follows very naturally upon +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_x" id="page_x">{x}</a></span> the +previous book. Some of the same topics necessarily recur here; and +references to the <i>Reconstruction</i> have been freely made, in +order to avoid all unnecessary repetition.</p> + +<p>That this social sense of the fully personal has finally a real and +definite contribution to make to theology, I cannot doubt. I can only +hope that the present discussion may be found at least suggestive, +particularly in the analysis of the social consciousness, and in the +treatment of mysticism and of the ethical in religion, as well as in +the consideration of the special influence of the elements of the +social consciousness upon the restatement of doctrine. Of the +doctrinal applications, the application to the problem of redemption +may be considered, perhaps, of most significance.</p> + +<div class="sigbloc"> +<span class="name">HENRY CHURCHILL KING.</span> +<br /> +<span class="placedate"><span class="smcap">Oberlin College</span>, +June, 1902.</span> +</div> + + +<h3>CONTENTS</h3> + +<div class="TOC"> + +<p class="part">INTRODUCTION</p> +<p class="sumry"> <span class="ralign">page</span></p> +<p class="sumry">The Theme<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_1">1</a></span></p> + +<p class="part">THE REAL MEANING OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS FOR +THEOLOGY</p> +<p class="chapt">INTRODUCTION</p> +<p class="sumry">The Point of View of the Theologian<span +class="ralign"><a href="#page_5">5</a></span></p> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER I</p> +<p class="sumry">The Definition of the Social Consciousness<span +class="ralign"><a href="#page_9">9</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Sense of the Like-Mindedness of Men<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_9">9</a></span></li> + <li>The Sense of the Mutual Influence of Men<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_11">11</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Contributing Lines of Thought<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_11">11</a></span></li> + <li>The Threefold Form of the Conviction<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_13">13</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>The Sense of the Value and Sacredness of the Person<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_16">16</a></span></li> + <li>The Sense of Obligation<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_18">18</a></span></li> + <li>The Sense of Love<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_20">20</a></span></li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER II</p> +<p class="sumry">The Inadequacy of the Analogy of the Organism as an +Expression of the Social Consciousness<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_23">23</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Value of the Analogy<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_23">23</a></span></li> + <li>The Inevitable Inadequacy of the Analogy<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_24">24</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>It Comes from the Sub-personal World<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_24">24</a></span></li> + <li>Access to Reality, Only Through Ourselves<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_24">24</a></span></li> + <li>Mistaken Passion for Construing Everything<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_25">25</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>The Analogy Tested by the Definition of the Social + Consciousness<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_27">27</a></span></li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER III</p> +<p class="sumry">The Necessity of the Facts of Which the Social +Consciousness is the Reflection,<br />If Ideal Interests are to be +Supreme<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_29">29</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Question<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_29">29</a></span></li> + <li>Otherwise, No Moral World at all<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_30">30</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>The Prerequisites of a Moral World<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_30">30</a></span> + <ul class="sssectn"> + <li>(1) A Sphere of Law<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_30">30</a></span></li> + <li>(2) Ethical Freedom<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_30">30</a></span></li> + <li>(3) Some Power of Accomplishment<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_31">31</a></span></li> + <li>(4) Members One of Another<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_32">32</a></span></li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>The Ideal World Requires, thus, the Facts of the Social + Consciousness<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_32">32</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER IV</p> +<p class="sumry">The Ultimate Explanation and Ground of the Social +Consciousness<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_35">35</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>How can it be, Metaphysically, that we do Influence One Another? + <span class="ralign"><a href="#page_35">35</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Not Due to the Physical Fact of Race-Connection<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_36">36</a></span></li> + <li>We are not to Over-Emphasize the Principle of Heredity<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_37">37</a></span></li> + <li>Not Due to a Mystical Solidarity<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_39">39</a></span></li> + <li>Grounded in the Immanence of God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_40">40</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>What is Required for the Final Positive Justification of the + Social Consciousness, as Ethical?<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_44">44</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Must be Grounded in the Supporting Will of God<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_44">44</a></span></li> + <li>God's Sharing in our Life<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_48">48</a></span></li> + <li>The Consequent Transfiguration of the Social + Consciousness<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_49">49</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + </ol> + +<p class="part">THE INFLUENCE OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS UPON<br />THE +CONCEPTION OF RELIGION</p> +<p class="sumry">Introduction<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_53">53</a></span></p> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER V</p> +<p class="sumry">The Opposition of the Social Consciousness to the +Falsely Mystical<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_55">55</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>What is the Falsely Mystical?<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_55">55</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Nash's Definition<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_55">55</a></span></li> + <li>Herrmann's Definition<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_56">56</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>The Objections of the Social Consciousness to the Falsely + Mystical<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_57">57</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Unethical<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_58">58</a></span></li> + <li>Does not Give a Really Personal God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_58">58</a></span></li> + <li>Belittles the Personal in Man<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_59">59</a></span></li> + <li>Leaves the Historically, Concretely Christian<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_62">62</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER VI</p> +<p class="sumry">The Emphasis of the Social Consciousness Upon the +Personal Relation in Religion,<br />and so Upon the Truly Mystical<span +class="ralign"><a href="#page_66">66</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Social Consciousness Tends Positively to Emphasize the + Personal Relation in Religion<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_66">66</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Emphasizes Everywhere the Personal<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_66">66</a></span></li> + <li>Requires the Laws of a Deepening Friendship in Religion<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_67">67</a></span></li> + <li>Requires the Ideal Conditions of the Richest Life in + Religion<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_68">68</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>The Social Consciousness thus Keeps the Truly Mystical<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_70">70</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>The Justifiable and Unjustifiable Elements in Mysticism<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_71">71</a></span> + <ul class="sssectn"> + <li>(1) Emotion, the Test<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_71">71</a></span></li> + <li>(2) Subjective Tendency<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_72">72</a></span></li> + <li>(3) Underestimating the Historical<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_72">72</a></span></li> + <li>(4) Tendency toward Vagueness<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_73">73</a></span></li> + <li>(5) Tendency toward Pantheism<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_73">73</a></span></li> + <li>(6) Tendency to Extravagant Symbolism<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_76">76</a></span></li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>The Protest in Favor of the Whole Man<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_78">78</a></span></li> + <li>The Self-Controlled Recognition of Emotion<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_82">82</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER VII</p> +<p class="sumry">The Thorough Ethicizing of Religion<span +class="ralign"><a href="#page_86">86</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Pressure of the Problem<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_86">86</a></span></li> + <li>The Statement of the Problem<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_87">87</a></span></li> + <li>The Answer<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_89">89</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Involved in Relation to Christ<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_89">89</a></span></li> + <li>The Divine Will Felt in the Ethical Command<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_90">90</a></span></li> + <li>Involved in the Nature of God's Gifts<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_91">91</a></span></li> + <li>Communion with God, Through Harmony with His Ethical Will<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_92">92</a></span></li> + <li>The Vision of God for the Pure in Heart<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_92">92</a></span></li> + <li>Sharing the Life of God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_93">93</a></span></li> + <li>Christ, as Satisfying Our Highest Claims on Life<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_94">94</a></span></li> + <li>The Vision of the Riches of the Life of Christ, Ethically + Conditioned<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_96">96</a></span></li> + <li>The Moral Law, as a Revelation of the Love of God<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_98">98</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER VIII</p> +<p class="sumry">The Emphasis of the Social Consciousness Upon the +Historically Christian<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_102">102</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Social Consciousness Needs Historical Justification<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_102">102</a></span></li> + <li>Christianity's Response to this Need<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_103">103</a></span></li> + </ol> + +<p class="part">THE INFLUENCE OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS UPON<br /> +THEOLOGICAL DOCTRINE</p> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER IX</p> +<p class="sumry">General Results<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_105">105</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Conception of Theology in Personal Terms<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_106">106</a></span></li> + <li>The Fatherhood of God, as the Determining Principle in + Theology<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_109">109</a></span></li> + <li>Christ's Own Social Emphases<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_111">111</a></span></li> + <li>The Reflection in Theology of the Changes in the Conception of + Religion<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_113">113</a></span></li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER X</p> +<p class="sumry">The Influence of the Deepening Sense of the +Like-Mindedness of Men Upon Theology<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_115">115</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>No Prime Favorites with God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_116">116</a></span></li> + <li>The Great Universal Qualities and Interests, the Most + Valuable<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_117">117</a></span></li> + <li>Essential Likeness Under very Diverse Forms<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_121">121</a></span></li> + <li>As Applied to the Question of Immortality<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_124">124</a></span></li> + <li>Consequent Larger Sympathy with Men, Faith in Men, and Hope for + Men<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_127">127</a></span></li> + <li>Judgment According to Light, and the Moral Reality of the Future + Life<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_132">132</a></span></li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER XI</p> +<p class="sumry">The Influence of the Deepening Sense of the Mutual +Influence of Men Upon Theology<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_136">136</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Real Unity of the Race<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_136">136</a></span></li> + <li>Deepening the Sense of Sin<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_139">139</a></span></li> + <li>Mutual Influence for Good in the Attainment of Character<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_145">145</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Application to the Problem of Redemption<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_147">147</a></span></li> + <li>The Consequent Ethical and Spiritual Meaning of Substitution + and Propitiation<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_150">150</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>Mutual Influence for Good in our Personal Relation to God<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_160">160</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>In Coming into the Kingdom<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_160">160</a></span></li> + <li>In Fellowship within the Kingdom<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_162">162</a></span></li> + <li>In Intercessory Prayer<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_164">164</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>Mutual Influence for Good in Confessions of Faith<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_167">167</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Complete Uniformity of Belief and Statement Impossible<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_169">169</a></span></li> + <li>Complete Uniformity of Belief and Statement Undesirable<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_171">171</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>The Consequent Importance of the Doctrine of the Church<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_177">177</a></span></li> + </ol> + +<p class="chapt">CHAPTER XII</p> +<p class="sumry">The Influence of the Deepening Sense of the Value and +Sacredness of the Person<br />Upon Theology<span class="ralign"><a +href="#page_179">179</a></span></p> + <ol class="sectn"> + <li>The Recognition of the Personal in Man<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_180">180</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Man's Personal Separateness from God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_180">180</a></span></li> + <li>Emphasis upon Man's Moral Initiative<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_181">181</a></span></li> + <li>Man, a Child of God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_183">183</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>The Recognition of the Personal in Christ<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_184">184</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>Christ, a Personal Revelation of God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_184">184</a></span></li> + <li>Emphasizing the Moral and Spiritual in Asserting the Supremacy + of Christ<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_185">185</a></span></li> + <li>The Moral and Spiritual Grounds of the Supremacy of + Christ<span class="ralign"><a href="#page_188">188</a></span> + <ul class="sssectn"> + <li>(1) The Greatest in the Greatest Sphere<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_188">188</a></span></li> + <li>(2) The Sinless and Impenitent One<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_192">192</a></span></li> + <li>(3) Consciously Rises to the Highest Ideal<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_194">194</a></span></li> + <li>(4) Realizes the Character of God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_195">195</a></span></li> + <li>(5) Consciously Able to Redeem All Men<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_196">196</a></span></li> + <li>(6) Complete Normality under this Transcendent + God-Consciousness<br /> and + Sense of Mission<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_197">197</a></span></li> + <li>(7) The Only Person Who can call out Absolute Trust<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_198">198</a></span></li> + <li>(8) The One, in Whom God Certainly Finds Us<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_199">199</a></span></li> + <li>(9) The Ideal Realized<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_200">200</a></span></li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>Christ's Double Uniqueness<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_201">201</a></span></li> + <li>The Increasing Sense of Our Kinship with Christ, and of His + Reality<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_205">205</a></span></li> + </ol> + </li> + <li>The Recognition of the Personal in God.<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_207">207</a></span> + <ol class="ssectn"> + <li>The Steady Carrying Through of the Completely Personal<br /> in + the Conception of God. Guarding the Conception<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_208">208</a></span></li> + <li>God is Always the Completely Personal God<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_212">212</a></span> + <ul class="sssectn"> + <li>(1) Consequent Relation of God to "Eternal Truths"<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_212">212</a></span></li> + <li>(2) Eternal Creation<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_214">214</a></span></li> + <li>(3) The Unity and Unchangeableness of God<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_216">216</a></span></li> + <li>(4) The Limitations of the Conception of Immanence<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_217">217</a></span></li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>Deepening the Thought of the Fatherhood of God<span + class="ralign"><a href="#page_218">218</a></span> + <ul class="sssectn"> + <li>(1) History, no Mere Natural Process<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_218">218</a></span></li> + <li>(2) God, the Great Servant<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_219">219</a></span></li> + <li>(3) No Divine Arbitrariness<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_220">220</a></span></li> + <li>(4) The Passibility of God<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_221">221</a></span></li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>As to the Doctrine of a Social Trinity<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_222">222</a></span></li> + <li>Preëminent Reverence for Personality, Characterizing<br /> all + God's Relations with Men<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_226">226</a></span> + <ul class="sssectn"> + <li>(1) Reflected in Christ<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_226">226</a></span></li> + <li>(2) In Creation<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_230">230</a></span></li> + <li>(3) In Providence<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_232">232</a></span></li> + <li>(4) In Our Personal Religious Life<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_233">233</a></span></li> + <li>(5) In the Judgment<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_237">237</a></span></li> + <li>(6) In the Future Life<span class="ralign"><a + href="#page_240">240</a></span></li> + </ul> + </li> + </ol> + </li> + </ol> + +</div> + +<p><br /><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_1" +id="page_1">{1}</a></span></p> + +<h1>THEOLOGY AND THE SOCIAL<br />CONSCIOUSNESS</h1> +<hr/> +<h3>INTRODUCTION<br /><br /><span class="h90"><i>THE +THEME</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">No</span> theologian can be excused to-day from +a careful study of the relations of theology and the social +consciousness. Whether this study becomes a formal investigation or +not, the social consciousness is so deep and significant a phenomenon +in the ethical life of our time, that it cannot be ignored by the +theologian who means to bring his message to men really home. This +book is written in the conviction that, while men are thus moved as +never before by a deep sense of mutual influence and obligation, they +have also as deep and genuine an interest as ever in the really +greatest questions of religion and theology. Interests so significant +and so akin cannot long remain isolated in the mind. They are certain +soon profoundly to influence <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_2" +id="page_2">{2}</a></span> each other. And this mutual influence of +theology and the social consciousness form the theme of this book.</p> + +<p>Two questions are naturally involved in this theme. First: Has +theology given any help, or has it any help to give, to the social +consciousness?—the question of the first division of the book. +Second: Has the social consciousness made any contribution, or has it +any contribution to make, to theology?—the question of the second and +third divisions. That is to say: On the one hand, Have the great facts +which theology studies any help to give to the man who faces the +problem of social progress—of the steady elevation of the race? On +the other hand, Has the great fact of the immensely quickened social +consciousness of our time, with all that it means, any help to give to +the theologian in his attempt to bring the great Christian truths +really home to men, to make them more real, more rational, more +vital?</p> + +<p>Or again: On the one hand, do theological doctrines—the most +adequate statements we can make of the great Christian truths—best +explain and best ground the social consciousness, so as best to bring +our entire thought in this sphere of the social into unity? Is <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_3" id="page_3">{3}</a></span> the +Christian truth so great that it not only includes all that is true in +this new social consciousness—is fully able to take it up into itself +and to make it feel at home there—but also, so great that it alone +can give the social consciousness its fullest meaning, alone enable it +to understand itself, and alone furnish it adequate motive and power? +Is the social consciousness, in truth, only a disguised statement of +Christian convictions, and does it really require the Christian +religion and its thoughtful expression to complete itself? Must the +social consciousness say, when it comes to full self-knowledge,—I am +myself an unmeaning and unjustified by-product, if there is not a God +in the full Christian sense? and, so saying, confirm again the great +Christian truths? This is the question of the first division.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, since the task of any given theologian is +necessarily temporary, and since any marked modification of the +consciousness of men will inevitably demand some restatement of +theological doctrine, the question here becomes—To what changed +points of view in religion and theology, to what restatements of +doctrine, and so to what truer appreciation of Christian truth, does +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_4" id="page_4">{4}</a></span> the +new social consciousness naturally lead? How do the affirmations of +the social consciousness, as the outcome of a careful, inductive study +of the social evolution of the race, affect our theological +statements? This is the question of the second and third divisions of +the book.</p> + +<p>Our discussion must of course assume and build on the conclusions +of sociology, and of New Testament theology, especially the +conclusions concerning the social teaching of Jesus.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_5" id="page_5">{5}</a></span></p> + + +<h2>THE REAL MEANING OF THE SOCIAL<br /> CONSCIOUSNESS FOR THEOLOGY</h2> +<h3>INTRODUCTION<br /><br /><span class="h90"><i>THE POINT OF +VIEW OF THE THEOLOGIAN</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">First</span>, then, what is the real meaning of +the social consciousness, as the theologian must view it? The answer +to this question involves a preliminary one: What is the point of view +of the theologian in any investigation? One can only give his own +answer.</p> + +<p>First of all, the theologian, as such, is an <i>interpreter</i>, +not a tracer of causal connections. He builds everywhere upon the +scientific investigator, and takes from him the statement of facts and +processes. With these he has primarily nothing to do. With reference +to the social consciousness, therefore, he does not attempt to do over +again the work of the sociologist; he asks only, What does the social +consciousness, in the light of the whole <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_6" id="page_6">{6}</a></span> of life and thought, mean; +not, How did it come about?</p> + +<p>The theologian, too, is a <i>believer in the supremacy of spiritual +interests</i>; this is his central contention. He affirms strenuously, +with the scientific worker, the place and value of the mechanical; but +he is certain that the mechanical can understand itself even, only as +it is seen to be simple means, and thus clearly subordinate in +significance. His problem is, therefore, everywhere, that of ideal +interpretation, not of mechanical explanation. But, while he has +nothing to do with the scientific tracing of immediate causal +connections, he recognizes causality itself as requiring an ultimate +explanation, that cannot be mechanically given. The theologian must be +in this, then, an <i>ideal</i> interpreter, and an inquirer after the +<i>ultimate</i> cause.</p> + +<p>The theologian assumes, moreover, the legitimacy and value of the +fact of <i>religion</i>; for theology is simply the thoughtful, +comprehensive, and unified expression of what religion means to us. +The meaning of the social consciousness to the theologian involves, +therefore, at once the question of its relation to religious +conviction.</p> + +<p>The point of view of the Christian theologian <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_7" id="page_7">{7}</a></span> involves, +besides, the <i>reality of the personal God</i> in personal relation +to persons. Theology is in earnest in its thought of God, and knows +that God is everywhere to be taken into account; that, if there is a +God at all, he is not to be exiled into some corner of his universe, +but is intimately concerned in all, is at the very heart of all; and +that, therefore, it is not a matter of merely curious interest or of +subsidiary inquiry, whether we are to look at our questions with God +in mind.</p> + +<p>Finally, the Christian theologian tries everywhere to make his +point of view <i>the point of view of Christ</i>. The theology, upon +which he ultimately stakes his all, is Christ's theology. He knows +that there is much concerning which he cannot refuse to think, but +upon which Christ has not expressed himself either explicitly or by +clear inference; but in all this unavoidable supplementary thinking he +aims to be absolutely loyal to the spirit of Christ.</p> + +<p>From this point of view of the Christian theologian, now, what does +the social consciousness mean? The answer may be given under four +heads: (1) the definition of the social consciousness; (2) the +inadequacy of <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_8" +id="page_8">{8}</a></span> the analogy of the organism, as an +expression of the social consciousness; (3) the necessity of the +facts, of which the social consciousness is the reflection, if ideal +interests are to be supreme; (4) the ultimate explanation and ground +of the social consciousness.</p> + +<p>These four topics form the subjects of the four chapters of the +first division of our inquiry.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_9" id="page_9">{9}</a></span></p> + +<h3>CHAPTER I<br /><br /><span class="h90"><i>THE DEFINITION +OF SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">The</span> simplest and probably the most +accurate single expression we can give to the social consciousness, is +to say that it is a growing sense of the real brotherhood of men. But +five elements seem plainly involved in this, and may be profitably +separated in our thought, if that is to be clear and definite:—a +deepening sense (1) of the likeness or like-mindedness of men, (2) of +their mutual influence, (3) of the value and sacredness of the person, +(4) of mutual obligation, and (5) of love.</p> + +<h4>I. THE SENSE OF THE LIKE-MINDEDNESS OF MEN<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_1" id="R_1" +href="#F_1">[1]</a></span></h4> + +<p>If a society is "a group of like-minded individuals," if the +"all-essential" requisites for coöperation are "like-mindedness and +consciousness of kind," as Giddings tells us, then certainly a prime +element in the social consciousness is likeness and the sense of <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_10" id="page_10">{10}</a></span> it—a +growing sense of the mental and moral resemblance and "potential +resemblance" of all men, and of all classes of men, though not +equality of powers.</p> + +<p>"Equality of need" among men, too,<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_2" id="R_2" href="#F_2">[2]</a></span> to which sociology +comes as one of its surest conclusions, implies a common capacity, +even if in varying degrees, to enter into the most fundamental +interests of life, and so points unmistakably to the essential +likeness of men in the most important things.</p> + +<p>So, too, sociology's unquestioning assertion that both smaller and +larger groups of men constantly tend toward unity, assumes potential +resemblance.</p> + +<p>And the uniform experience and prescription of social workers, that +<i>really</i> knowing "how the other half lives" brings increasing +sympathy, also affirm the fundamental likeness of men. Every +painstaking investigation of a social question comes out at some point +or other with a fresh discovery of a previously hidden, underlying +resemblance between classes of men.</p> + +<p>From the careful, inductive study of social evolution, too, the men +of our day see, as no other generation has seen, that the great force +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_11" id="page_11">{11}</a></span> +always and everywhere at work in that evolution has been likeness and +the consciousness of it.</p> + +<p>For all these reasons, this generation believes, as men never +believed before, in the essential like-mindedness of men; and this +deepening sense of the like-mindedness of men is certainly one element +in the modern social consciousness.</p> + +<h4>II. THE SENSE OF THE MUTUAL INFLUENCE OF MEN</h4> + +<p>A second element in the social consciousness, and, perhaps, that +which has most of all characterized it through the larger period of +its growth, is the strong sense of the mutual influence of men—that +we are all "members one of another."</p> + +<p>1. <i>Contributing Lines of Thought.</i>—It is worth seeing how +firmly planted the idea is. Several lines of thought have united to +induce men to emphasize—perhaps even to over-emphasize—this way of +thinking of society. The influence of natural science, in the first +place, has been inevitably in this direction. Its root idea of the +universality of law forces upon one the thought of a world which is a +<i>coherent</i> whole, a unity with <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_12" id="page_12">{12}</a></span> universal forces in it, in +which every part is inextricably connected with every other. So, too, +the acceptance of the theory of evolution has led science to regard +the whole history of the physical universe as an organic growth.</p> + +<p>Psychology, also, with its present-day emphasis, in Baldwin and +Royce, upon the constant presence and fundamental character of +<i>imitation</i>, and its insistence upon the still more fundamental +impulsiveness of consciousness which Dewey believes underlies +imitation,<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_3" id="R_3" +href="#F_3">[3]</a></span> is really proclaiming exactly this element +of the social consciousness. And the whole assertion by the later +psychology of the unity of man—mind and body, and of the complex +intertwining of all the functions of the mind, is in closest harmony +with a similar view of society.</p> + +<p>Philosophy, too, is exerting all along a half-unconscious pressure +toward the thought of the organic unity of society. That philosophy +may exist at all, it must start from the assumption of a universe, a +real unity of truth, and its problem is to find a <i>discerned</i> +unity. It knows no unrelated being, and, consequently, whether it +theoretically accepts <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_13" +id="page_13">{13}</a></span> the formulation or not, it must admit +that, as a matter of fact, to be is to be in relations. It asserts as +a universal fact, what natural science and psychology both affirm in +their own respective spheres, the concrete relatedness of all. It +cannot well deny the same thought when applied to society. Its +repeated attempts, moreover, to conceive all as a developing unity, +and the profound influence of the analogy of the organism upon its +history, both further sustain the organic view of society.</p> + +<p>Christianity, as well, has been a powerful factor in this direction +from the beginning, for it really first gave the Idea of +Humanity.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_4" id="R_4" +href="#F_4">[4]</a></span></p> + +<p>2. <i>The Threefold Form of the Conviction.</i>—Sustained, now, by +all these movements in natural science, psychology, philosophy, and +Christianity, this thought of the mutual influence of men has taken +three forms: that mutual influence is inevitable, isolation +impossible; that mutual influence is desirable, isolation to be +shunned; that mutual influence is indispensable, isolation +blighting.</p> + +<p>(1) This second element in the social consciousness has meant, +then, in the first place, a growing sense of the inevitableness <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_14" id="page_14">{14}</a></span> of the +mutual influence of all men, and of all classes of men; that we are +all parts of one whole, each part unavoidably affected by every other; +that we are bound up in one bundle of life with all men, and cannot +live an isolated life if we would; that we do influence one another +whether we will or not, and tend unconsciously to draw others to our +level and are ourselves drawn toward theirs; that we joy and suffer +together whether we will or not, and grow or deteriorate together.</p> + +<p>(2) But the mutual influence of men means more than this: not only +that we do inevitably affect one another in living out our own life, +but a growing sense of the fact that we are obviously not intended to +come to our best in independence of one another; that we are made on +so large a plan that we cannot come to our best alone; that we are +evidently made for personal relations, and that, therefore, largeness +of life for ourselves depends on our entering into the life of +others.</p> + +<p>(3) But even more than this is true. It is not only that entering +into the life of others is a help in my life, it is <i>the</i> great +help, the one great means, the indispensable, the essential <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_15" id="page_15">{15}</a></span> +condition of all largeness of life; it is the very meaning of +life,—life itself. We are to find our life only in losing our life. +Life is the fulfilment of relations. When we try to run away from the +variety and complexity of these relations, we are running away from +life itself. The indispensableness of these relations to others is +assumed, also, in the assertion by the sociologist of an evolution +toward a society, at once more and more complex, and more and more +perfect.</p> + +<p>But if I grow in the growth of another, the other grows in my +growth. If the only thing of value that I can finally give is myself, +the value of that gift depends upon the largeness and richness of the +self given. For love's own sake, therefore, I must grow, must strive +to bring to its highest perfection that work which is given me to do. +A person is a social being called to contribute to the whole, in the +line of his own best possibilities. One's largest ministry to others +is to be rendered, then, through sacred regard for one's own calling, +considered as exactly his place of largest service. Or, to put it the +other way: I can come to my best only in work so great and in +associations so large <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_16" +id="page_16">{16}</a></span> that I may lose myself in them in perfect +objectivity.</p> + +<p>The mutual influence of men, therefore, is unavoidable, is +desirable, is indispensable; isolation impossible, hindering, +blighting. This is the true solidarity of the race, in which there is +no fiction, no hiding in the inconceivable, and no pretense.</p> + +<h4>III. THE SENSE OF THE VALUE AND SACREDNESS OF THE PERSON</h4> + +<p>The third element in the social consciousness, the sense of the +value and sacredness of the person, follows naturally from the sense +of like-mindedness and of mutual influence, but needs distinct and +emphatic statement.</p> + +<p>It is less easily separable than the other elements named, and, +indeed, may be made to include all the others, and does, in a way, +carry all with it. Thus broadly conceived, it has seemed to the writer +that—with the return to the historical Christ—it might well be +called the most notable moral characteristic of our time.<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_5" id="R_5" href="#F_5">[5]</a></span> +But, though less easily and definitely discriminated, one who knows +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_17" id="page_17">{17}</a></span> +deeply the modern social consciousness would surely feel that the very +heart of it had been omitted, if this growing sense of the value and +sacredness of the person did not come to strong expression. Reverence +for personality—the steadily deepening sense that every person has a +value not to be measured in anything else, and is in himself sacred to +God and man—this it is which marks unmistakably every step in the +progress of the individual and of the race. Without it, whatever the +other marks of civilization, you have only tyranny and slavery; with +it, though every trace of luxury and scientific invention be lacking, +you have the perfection of human relations.</p> + +<p>This sense of the value and sacredness of the person not only +characterizes increasingly the whole social and moral evolution of the +race, but it is to be seen in the clearly conscious demand for +equality of rights, and, especially—to take a single example—in the +growing recognition that the child is an individual with his own +rights; that he has a personality of his own of a sanctity inviolable +by the parent; that there are clear bounds beyond which no one may go +without personal outrage. The recognition by <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_18" id="page_18">{18}</a></span> psychology of respect for +personality as one of the three or four most fundamental +conditions—if not the most essential of all—of happiness, of +character, and of influence, is explicit confirmation of the truth of +this element of the social consciousness.</p> + +<h4>IV. THE SENSE OF OBLIGATION</h4> + +<p>But the elements of the social consciousness already named lead +directly to a growing sense of obligation. Every man carries in +himself his only possible standard of measurement of all else. A +growing sense of the likeness of other men to himself quickens at +once, therefore, the sense of obligation, and leads naturally to the +Golden Rule. Recognition of mutual influence, too, inevitably carries +with it a deeper sense of obligation; for, if we do affect others +constantly, then we are manifestly under obligation not only to do +direct service to others, but so to order our own lives as to help, +not to hinder, others. The sense of the value and sacredness of the +person plainly looks to the same deepening of obligation.</p> + +<p>As an element of the social consciousness, the sense of obligation +means for a given <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_19" +id="page_19">{19}</a></span> individual, a growing sense of +responsibility for all; and for society at large an increase in the +number of those who feel the obligation to serve.</p> + +<p>The growth in each of these directions cannot be questioned. There +is no privileged class, in whose own consciences there is not being +recognized more and more the right of the claim that they must justify +themselves by service which shall be as unique as their privilege. In +consequence, the conception of the governing classes is steadily +changing, for both the governed and the governing, to some recognition +of Christ's principle, that he who would be first must be servant of +all. The sharp insistence of the sociologist that "organization must +be for the organized" expresses the same thought. One must add +sociology's double assertion, that society is really advancing toward +its goal, and yet that a chief condition of the progress of society is +unselfish leadership.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_6" id="R_6" +href="#F_6">[6]</a></span> This can only mean that there is, +increasingly, unselfish leadership, more and more of conscious, +willing coöperation on the part of men in forwarding the social +evolution.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_20" +id="page_20">{20}</a></span> None of us can return to the older +attitude of comparative indifference, nor can we honestly defend it. +We do have obligations and we own them; we are judging ourselves +increasingly by Christ's test of ministering love.</p> + +<h4>V. THE SENSE OF LOVE</h4> + +<p>And the social consciousness ends necessarily in love, in the +broader, ethical meaning of that word. We shall never feel that the +social consciousness is complete, short of real love. All the other +elements of the social consciousness lead to love and are included in +it. Even the sociologist must bring in as necessary results of the +consciousness of kind—sympathy, affection, and desire for the +recognition of others;<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_7" id="R_7" +href="#F_7">[7]</a></span> and he finds these always more or less +distinctly at work among men.</p> + +<p>These further considerations from the study of evolution confirm +this result: that man is preëminently the social animal;<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_8" id="R_8" href="#F_8">[8]</a></span> +that with man we have clearly reached the stage of persons and of +personal relations;<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_9" id="R_9" +href="#F_9">[9]</a></span> that the very existence and development of +man required <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_21" +id="page_21">{21}</a></span> love at every step;<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_10" id="R_10" href="#F_10">[10]</a></span> +and that the chief moral significance of man's prolonged infancy is +probably to be found in the necessary calling out of love.<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_11" id="R_11" +href="#F_11">[11]</a></span></p> + +<p>So, too, it has become constantly more and more clear that our +obligation, what we owe to others, is ourselves; and the giving of the +self is love. It seems to be thrust home upon social workers +everywhere that there is no solution of any social problem without a +personal self-giving in some way on the part of some; that there is no +cheaper way than this very costly one of love, of the giving of +ourselves—whether in the family, or in charity, or in +criminology.</p> + +<p>The point, already noted, that the progress of society depends on +leaders who will serve with unselfish devotion, is only another +emphasis upon love as an indispensable element of the social +consciousness.</p> + +<p>And the social goal—equality, brotherhood, liberty, when these +terms are given any adequate ethical content—is absolutely +unthinkable in any really vital sense without love.</p> + +<p>Any attempted definition of love, moreover, <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_22" id="page_22">{22}</a></span> +resolves at once into what we mean by the social consciousness. If we +define love as the giving of self, this is exactly what, with growing +clearness and insistence, the social consciousness demands. If with +Herrmann we call love, "joy in personal life"—joy, that is, in the +revelation of personal life, this can only come in that trustful, +reverent, self-surrendering association to which the social +consciousness exhorts. If with Edwards we call love, willing the +highest and completest good of all, we reach the same result. Or if +with Christ in the Beatitudes, or with Paul in the thirteenth of I +Corinthians, we study the characteristics of love, we shall hardly +doubt that a complete social consciousness must have these marks of +love.</p> + +<p>These elements, then, make up the social consciousness: the sense +of like-mindedness, of mutual influence, of the value and sacredness +of the person, of obligation, and of love; and all these, with their +implied demands, only point to what a person must be if he is to be +fully personal.</p> + +<p>With this definition in mind, we may now ask, whether the analogy +of the organism can adequately express the social consciousness.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_1" id="F_1" href="#R_1" class="label">[1]</a> +Cf. Giddings, <i>Elements of Sociology</i>, pp. 6, 10, 65, 66, 77. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_2" id="F_2" href="#R_2" class="label">[2]</a> +Cf. Giddings, <i>Op. cit.</i>, p. 324. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_3" id="F_3" href="#R_3" class="label">[3]</a> +See <i>The New World</i>, Sept., 1898, p. 516. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_4" id="F_4" href="#R_4" class="label">[4]</a> +Cf. Lotze, <i>The Microcosmus</i>, Vol. II, p. 211. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_5" id="F_5" href="#R_5" class="label">[5]</a> +See King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, Chap. IX, pp, 169 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_6" id="F_6" href="#R_6" class="label">[6]</a> +See Giddings, <i>Op. cit.</i>, pp. 302, 320-322. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_7" id="F_7" href="#R_7" class="label">[7]</a> +Cf. Giddings, <i>Op. cit.</i>, pp. 65, 66. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_8" id="F_8" href="#R_8" class="label">[8]</a> +Cf. Giddings, <i>Op. cit.</i>, p. 241. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_9" id="F_9" href="#R_9" class="label">[9]</a> +See King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, pp. 92-96. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_10" id="F_10" href="#R_10" class="label">[10]</a> +Cf. Drummond, <i>The Ascent of Man</i>, pp. 272 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_11" id="F_11" href="#R_11" class="label">[11]</a> +Cf. John Fiske, <i>The Destiny of Man</i>, p. 74; Drummond, <i>Op. +cit.</i>, p. 279 ff. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_23" +id="page_23">{23}</a></span></p> + +<h3>CHAPTER II<br /><br /><span class="h90"><i>THE INADEQUACY +OF THE ANALOGY OF THE ORGANISM<br /> AS AN EXPRESSION OF THE SOCIAL +CONSCIOUSNESS</i></span><span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_12" +id="R_12" href="#F_12">[12]</a></span></h3> + +<h4>I. THE VALUE OF THE ANALOGY</h4> + +<p><span class="smcap">The</span> analogy of the organism has played +so large a part in the history of thought, especially in the +consideration of ethical and social questions, that it is well worth +while to ask exactly how far this analogy is adequate, although the +danger of the abuse of the analogy is probably somewhat less than +formerly.</p> + +<p>It may be said at once that it is, undoubtedly, the very best +illustration of these social relations that we can draw from nature, +and it is of real value. It has had, moreover, as already indicated, a +most influential and largely honorable history in the development of +the thought of men. Its classical expression is in the epoch-making +twelfth chapter of I Corinthians, which makes so plain the ethical +applications of the analogy.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_24" id="page_24">{24}</a></span></p> + +<h4>II. THE INEVITABLE INADEQUACY OF THE ANALOGY</h4> + +<p>1. <i>Comes from the Sub-personal World.</i>—But it ought clearly +to be seen, on the other hand, that, considered as a complete +expression of the social consciousness, it is necessarily inadequate; +and it is of moment that we should not be dominated by it. Too often +it has been made to cover the entire ground, as though in itself it +were a complete expression and final explanation of the social +consciousness, instead of a quite incomplete illustration. For, in the +first place, the very fact that the analogy comes from the physical +world, from the sub-personal realm, makes it certain that it must fail +at vital points in the expression of what is peculiarly a personal and +ethical fact. We cannot safely argue directly from the physical +illustration to ethical propositions.</p> + +<p>2. <i>Access to Reality, Only Through Ourselves.</i>—Moreover, in +this day of extraordinary attention to the physical world, it is +particularly important that we should keep constantly in mind that we +have direct access to reality only in ourselves; that man is himself +necessarily the only key which we can use for any <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_25" id="page_25">{25}</a></span> +ultimate understanding of anything; or, as Paulsen puts it, "I know +reality as it is in itself, in so far as I am real myself, or in so +far as it is, or is like, that which I am, namely, spirit."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_13" id="R_13" href="#F_13">[13]</a></span> +We are not to forget that, in very truth, we know <i>better</i> what +we mean by persons and personal relations, than we do what we mean by +members of a body and by organic relations; and, further, that in +point of fact, all those metaphysical notions by which we strive to +think things are ultimately derived from ourselves; and that then we +illogically turn back upon our own minds, from which all these notions +came, to explain the mind in the same secondary way in which we +explain other things.</p> + +<p>3. <i>Mistaken Passion for Construing Everything.</i>—Natural +science, with its sole problem of the tracing of immediate causal +connections, naturally provokes a persistent, but nevertheless +thoroughly mistaken, "passion," as Lotze calls it,<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_14" id="R_14" href="#F_14">[14]</a></span> +"for construing everything,"—even the most real and final reality, +spirit; which wishes to see even this real and final reality explained +as the mechanical result of the combination of simpler elements, +themselves, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_26" +id="page_26">{26}</a></span> it is to be noted, finally absolutely +inexplicable. Such perverse attempts will be widely hailed, by many +who do not understand themselves, as highly scientific. And one who +refuses to enter upon such investigations will be criticized by such +minds as "hardly getting into grips with his subject."</p> + +<p>But it is a false application of the scientific instinct that leads +one to seek mechanical explanation for the final reality, or that +urges to precision of formulation beyond that warranted by the data. +It is from exactly this falsely scientific bias that theology needs +deliverance. "For," as Aristotle reminds us, "it is the mark of a man +of culture to try to attain exactness in each kind of knowledge just +so far as the nature of the subject allows." There is a wise +agnosticism that is violated alike by negative and by positive +dogmatism. It is often overlooked that there is an over-wise +radicalism that assumes a knowledge of the depth of the finite and +infinite, quite as insistent and dogmatic as the view it supposes +itself to be opposing. "I know it is not so," it ought not to need to +be said, is not agnosticism.</p> + +<p>The guiding principle in a truly scientific theology is this, as +Lotze suggests: Just <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_27" +id="page_27">{27}</a></span> so far as changing action depends upon +altering conditions, we have explanatory and constructive problems to +solve, and no farther. No philosophical view can do without a simply +given reality. And we shall never succeed in understanding by what +machinery reality is manufactured—in "deducing the whole positive +content of reality from mere modifications of formal conditions."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_15" id="R_15" +href="#F_15">[15]</a></span></p> + +<p>We shall not allow ourselves to be misled, therefore, by the +scientific sound of the <i>detailed</i> application of the analogy of +the organism to the facts of the social consciousness. And it is a +satisfaction to see that the clearest sociological writers are coming +to agree that there is strictly no "social mind" that can be affirmed +to exist as a separate reality, supposed to answer to society +conceived in its totality as an organism.</p> + +<h4>III. THE ANALOGY TESTED BY THE DEFINITION<br /> +OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS</h4> + +<p>When, now, we test the analogy of the organism by its competency to +express the full meaning of the social consciousness, as it has been +defined, we must say that the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_28" +id="page_28">{28}</a></span> analogy but feebly expresses the likeness +of men; it best expresses the inevitableness of mutual influence, +though even here there is no understandable ultimate explanation; it +fairly expresses the desirableness and indispensableness of mutual +influence, but, of course, with entire lack of ethical meaning; and it +quite fails to express the sense of the value and the sacredness of +the person, the sense of obligation, and the sense of love. We need to +see and feel exactly these shortcomings, if we are not to abuse the +analogy. There is no social consciousness that will hold water that +does not rest on what Phillips Brooks called "a healthy and +ineradicable individualism," in the sense of the recognition of the +fully personal. We are spirits, not organisms, and society is a +society of persons, not an organism, in a strict sense. Why should we +wish to make society less significant than it is?</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_12" id="F_12" href="#R_12" class="label">[12]</a> +Cf. King, <i>Op. cit.</i>, pp. 92 ff., 179. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_13" id="F_13" href="#R_13" class="label">[13]</a> +<i>Introduction to Philosophy</i>, p. 373. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_14" id="F_14" href="#R_14" class="label">[14]</a> +<i>The Microcosmus</i>, Vol. I, p. 262. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_15" id="F_15" href="#R_15" class="label">[15]</a> +Lotze, <i>The Microcosmus</i>, Vol. II, pp. 649 ff. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_29" +id="page_29">{29}</a></span></p> + + +<h3>CHAPTER III<br /><br /><span class="h90"><i>THE NECESSITY +OF THE FACTS, OF WHICH THE SOCIAL<br /> CONSCIOUSNESS IS THE +REFLECTION, IF IDEAL<br />INTERESTS ARE TO BE SUPREME</i></span></h3> + +<h4>I. THE QUESTION</h4> + +<p><span class="smcap">With</span> this positive and negative +definition of the social consciousness in our minds, a third question +immediately suggests itself to one who wishes to go to the bottom of +our theme. Why must the facts, of which the social consciousness is +the reflection, be as they are if ideal interests are to be supreme? +What has a theodicy to say as to these facts? Why, that is, from the +point of view of the ideal—of religion and theology—why are we +constituted so alike? so that we must influence one another? so that +the results of our actions necessarily go over into the lives of +others? so that the innocent suffer with the guilty and the guilty +profit with the righteous? so that we must recognize everywhere the +claim of others? so that we must respect their personality? and so +that we must love them?</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_30" +id="page_30">{30}</a></span></p> + +<h4>II. OTHERWISE NO MORAL WORLD AT ALL</h4> + +<p>The answer to all these world-old questions may perhaps be +contained in the single statement, that otherwise we should have no +moral world at all. There would be no thinkable moral universe, but +rather as many worlds as there are individuals, having no more to do +with one another than the chemical reactions going on in a set of +test-tubes.</p> + +<p>1. <i>The Prerequisites of a Moral World.</i> For our human +thinking, assuredly, there are certain prerequisites, that the world +may be at all a sphere for moral training and action. What are these +prerequisites for a moral world? There must be, in the first place, a +<i>sphere of universal law</i>, to count on, within which all actions +take place. In a lawless world, action could hardly take on any +significance—least of all ethical significance. That freedom itself +should mean anything in outward expression, there must be the +possibility of intelligent use of means toward the ends chosen.</p> + +<p>There must be, in the second place, some <i>real ethical +freedom</i>, some power of moral initiative. We need not quarrel about +the terms used; but, as Paulsen intimates, no serious <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_31" id="page_31">{31}</a></span> ethical +writer ever doubted that men have at least some power to shape their +own characters.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_16" id="R_16" +href="#F_16">[16]</a></span> Without that assumption, we have a whole +world of ideas and ideals—many of them the realest facts in the world +to us—that have no legitimate excuse for being, that are simple +insanities of the most inexplicable sort. The very meaning of the +personality, indeed, which the social consciousness must demand for +men, is some real existence for self, that is, some real +self-consciousness and moral initiative.</p> + +<p>And freedom is not enough; there must be also <i>some power of +accomplishment</i>. To ascribe mere volition to man seems, it has been +justly said, sophistical. Results are needed to reveal the character +of our acts, even to ourselves—to make that character real. Lotze's +charge that the world is imperfect because it might have been so made +that only good designs could be carried out, or so that the results of +evil volitions would be at once corrected,<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_17" id="R_17" href="#F_17">[17]</a></span> is itself similarly +sophistical. Such a world, in which the outward results of action +never appear, would be but a play-world after all—only a nursery of +babes not <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_32" +id="page_32">{32}</a></span> yet capable of character. It could be no +fit world for moral training.</p> + +<p>And still more, not less, must this law of the necessary results of +actions hold in our relations to other persons. There can be, least of +all, a moral universe where we are not <i>members one of another</i>. +Character, in any form we can conceive it, could not then exist. Our +best, as well as our worst, possibilities are involved in these +necessary mutual relations. Moral character has meaning only in +personal relations. The results, therefore, which follow upon action, +if the character of our deed is to have reality for us, must be +chiefly personal. The realm of character has fearful possibilities. +This <i>is</i> no play-world. We can cause and be caused suffering, +and our sin necessarily carries the suffering, if not the sin, of +others with it.</p> + +<p>2. <i>The Ideal World Requires, thus, the Facts of the Social +Consciousness.</i>—All this could be changed in any vital way only by +shutting up every soul absolutely to itself, and with that result life +has simply ceased.</p> + +<p>For we cannot really conceive a person as having any reason for +being without such relations. He would be constantly baffled at every +point, for he is made for persons and <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_33" id="page_33">{33}</a></span> personal relations. Love, +too, the highest source of both character and happiness, requires +everywhere personal relations. Religion itself, as a sharing of the +life of God, would be impossible without some relation to others; for +God, at least, could not be separated from the life of all. That is, +persons, love, religion, in such a world, have gone.</p> + +<p>This, then, simply means that the ideal world ceases to be, with +the denial of the facts that the social consciousness reflects. We +must be full persons, social beings in the entire meaning demanded by +the social consciousness—hard as the consequences involved often +are—if ideal interests are to be supreme. Indeed, the very moral +judgment, that incessantly prompts the problem of evil for every one +of us, is required, for its own existence, to assume the validity of +the relations about which it questions. For it complains, for the most +part, of those facts that follow inevitably from the necessary mutual +influence of men; but the chief sources of the joy it requires, that +it may justify the world, lie in these same mutual relations. It +assumes, thus, in its claims on the world, the validity and worth of +the very relations of <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_34" +id="page_34">{34}</a></span> which it complains in its criticism of +the world. Or, slightly to vary the statement, the major premise, even +of pessimism, is that a really justifiable world must have worth in +the joy it yields in personal life, impossible out of the personal +relations of a real moral universe. And there can be no moral universe +without the facts reflected in the social consciousness. The ideal +world requires, then, the facts of the social consciousness.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_16" id="F_16" href="#R_16" class="label">[16]</a> +<i>System of Ethics</i>, pp. 467 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_17" id="F_17" href="#R_17" class="label">[17]</a> +<i>Philosophy of Religion</i>, p. 125. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_35" +id="page_35">{35}</a></span></p> + + +<h3>CHAPTER IV<br /><br /><span class="h90"><i>THE ULTIMATE +EXPLANATION AND GROUND OF THE<br />SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">The</span> most important and fundamental +inquiry as to the possible help of theology to the social +consciousness still remains: What is the ultimate explanation and +ground of the social consciousness? This question includes two: (1) +How can it be metaphysically that we do influence one another? (2) +What is required for the final positive justification of the social +consciousness as ethical? Theology's answer to both questions is found +in the being and character of God, the creative and moral source of +all.</p> + +<h4>I. HOW CAN IT BE, METAPHYSICALLY, THAT WE DO<br /> INFLUENCE ONE +ANOTHER?</h4> + +<p>First, then, how can it be that we do influence one another? What +is the final explanation of the constant fact of our reciprocal +action? For in our final thinking we may not ignore this question.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_36" +id="page_36">{36}</a></span> 1. <i>Not Due to the Physical Fact of +Race-Connection.</i>—It may be worth while saying, first, that the +physical fact of race-connection, if that could be proved, would be no +sufficient explanation. The race may, or may not, be dependent upon a +single pair, but in any case this is not the essential connection. The +race is one by virtue of its essential likeness, however that comes +about. Men might have sprung out of the ground in absolute individual +independence of one another, and yet if there were such actual +like-mindedness as now exists, the race would be as truly one as it +now is, and as capable of reciprocal action, and its members under the +same obligation to one another. No ideal interest is at stake, then, +in the question of the actual physical unity of the race as descended +from one pair.</p> + +<p>One may say, of course, that the physical unity of the race would +naturally result, according to the laws apparently prevailing in the +animal world, in likeness. And this may, therefore, seem to him the +most natural proximate explanation. But, even so, it is well to know +that our entire <i>moral</i> interest is in the essential likeness and +mutual influence of men, however brought about, and <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_37" id="page_37">{37}</a></span> not in +the physical unity of men. Theology has no occasion to continue its +earlier excessive and quite fundamental emphasis upon this physical +unity. Moreover, such an explanation is necessarily but proximate. +Back of it lies the deeper question, Why just these laws, and modes of +procedure?</p> + +<p>2. <i>We are not to Over-Emphasize the Principle of +Heredity.</i>—Nor can theology, from any point of view, afford to +over-emphasize the principle of heredity if it wishes to keep human +initiative at all. It is a dangerous alliance which the old-school +theology with its racial sin in Adam has been so ready to make with +the principle of heredity. That principle, as they wish to use it, +proves quite too much; and careful thinkers, really awake to ideal +interests, may well rejoice in the comparative relief which science +itself, through the probably somewhat exaggerated protest of the +Weismann or Neo-Darwinian school, seems likely to afford from the +incubus of a grossly exaggerated heredity. The main interest for the +ideal view lies right here. We can see why this law of the +"inheritance of acquired characteristics," in Professor James' +language, "<i>should not</i> be verified in the human race, and why, +therefore, in looking for evidence <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_38" id="page_38">{38}</a></span> on the subject, we should +confine ourselves exclusively to lower animals. In them fixed habit is +the essential and characteristic law of nervous action. The brain +grows to the exact modes in which it has been exercised, and the +inheritance of these modes—then called instincts—would have in it +nothing surprising. But in man the negation of all fixed modes is the +essential characteristic. He owes his whole preëminence as a reasoner, +his whole human quality of intellect, we may say, to the facility with +which a given mode of thought in him may suddenly be broken up into +elements, which re-combine anew. Only at the price of inheriting no +settled instinctive tendencies is he able to settle every novel case +by the fresh discovery by his reason of novel principles. He is, +<i>par excellence</i>, the educable animal."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_18" id="R_18" href="#F_18">[18]</a></span></p> + +<p>To over-emphasize the principle of heredity, then, is to strike at +one of the most fundamental distinctive human qualities, and so to +endanger every ideal interest. The growing like-mindedness of men and +their mutual influence are not forthwith to be ascribed to an +omnipotent principle of heredity.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_39" +id="page_39">{39}</a></span> 3. <i>Not Due to a Mystical +Solidarity.</i>—Nor is the mutual influence of men to be explained by +any mystical solidarity of the race considered as a <i>finite</i> +whole. It is a simple and reasonable scientific demand, that we should +not assume a mysterious, indefinable and incalculable cause, where +known and intelligible causes suffice to explain the phenomena in +question. Do we need, or can we intelligently use, a mystical +solidarity? The only solidarity of the race which we seem really to +need, or with which we seem able intelligently to deal, is the actual +like-mindedness and the actual personal relations themselves—the +reciprocal action of spirits—the only kind of reciprocal action which +we can finally fully conceive. Any other finite solidarity than this, +though it has often figured in theology, seems to me only a name +without significance. In any case, we need to insist in theology, much +more than we have, upon that unity of the race which is due to the +actual likeness of men and their actual mutual personal influence. +Such a unity we know and can understand, and it is of the highest +ethical and spiritual importance. But to make much of the physical +unity is to ground the spiritual in the physical; and, on <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_40" id="page_40">{40}</a></span> the +other hand, to take refuge in a mystical solidarity—and this is often +felt to be a rather deep procedure—for whatever theological purpose, +is to hide in the fog of the obscure and unintelligible.</p> + +<p>4. <i>Grounded in the Immanence of God.</i>—But back of all finite +phenomena, we may still ask for an ultimate explanation of the +possibility of any reciprocal action even between spirits. And it is, +perhaps, this ultimate explanation after which the idea of a mystical +solidarity of the race is blindly groping. Unless one chooses to +accept reciprocal action as a necessarily given fact in any universe +(and this position, I think with F. C. S. Schiller, may be reasonably +defended),<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_19" id="R_19" +href="#F_19">[19]</a></span> he must somewhere in his thinking ask for +its final explanation. And most of those, who try to think things +through, feel this pressure. And metaphysics, we do well to remember +with Professor James, "means only an unusually obstinate attempt to +think clearly and consistently."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_20" +id="R_20" href="#F_20">[20]</a></span> As Lotze puts it: "How a cause +begins to produce its <i>immediate</i> effect, how a condition is the +foundation of its direct result, it will never be possible to say; yet +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_41" id="page_41">{41}</a></span> +that cause and effect <i>do</i> thus act must be reckoned among those +simple facts that compose the reality which is the object of all our +investigation. But there is an intolerable contradiction in the +assumption that, though two beings may be wholly independent the one +of the other, yet that which takes place in one can be a cause of +change in the other; things that do not affect each other at all, +cannot at the same time affect each other in such a manner that the +one is guided by the other."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_21" +id="R_21" href="#F_21">[21]</a></span></p> + +<p>This question is fairly thrust upon us by the facts of the social +consciousness. How can it be that we do so influence one another? how +is our reciprocal action metaphysically possible? The answer of +theistic philosophy to this question is found in the being of God.</p> + +<p>Upon the metaphysical side, theistic philosophy affirms that we can +ascribe independent existence in the highest sense only to God. All +else is absolutely dependent for its existence and maintenance upon +him. The kind of reality that we demand for man is not that he be +<i>outside</i> of God, independent of him; this would not make man +more, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_42" +id="page_42">{42}</a></span> but less. Every thorough-going theistic +view must have this at least in common with pantheism, that it +recognizes everywhere a real immanence of God. We are, because God +wills in us. This metaphysical relation of the finite to the infinite, +to be sure, is not to be conceived spatially or materially; nor, least +of all, is it be so conceived as to deny a real self-consciousness and +a real moral initiative to the finite spirit; but it does involve the +absolute dependence of all the finite upon the will of God. As to our +<i>being</i>, we root solely in God. And the unity and consistency of +the being of God are the actual ground of our possible reciprocal +action. Only so is that contradiction of which Lotze spoke avoided. We +are not independent of one another, because we are all alike dependent +for our very being upon God. And we are thus members one of another, +ultimately, only through him.</p> + +<p>The further fact, that we are never fully able to trace causal +connections anywhere; that even in the clearest case no possible +analysis of one stage in the process enables us to prophesy, +independently of experience, the next stage, also compels us to admit +that the full cause is not really present in any of <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_43" id="page_43">{43}</a></span> the +finite manifestations we can follow; that we have always to take +account of the "hidden efficacy of the Infinite everywhere at work," +and so must recognize once again the indubitable immanence of God, the +absolute dependence of the finite upon his will, and our reciprocal +action as possible only through him.<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_22" id="R_22" href="#F_22">[22]</a></span></p> + +<p>Or, to put the same thing a little differently, any adequate theory +of causality seems to lead us up inevitably to purpose in God. As +Professor Bowne states it:<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_23" +id="R_23" href="#F_23">[23]</a></span> "The fundamental antithesis of +purpose and causation is incorrect. The true antithesis is that of +mechanical and volitional causality." And he intimates the probability +that all causality, even in the physical world, is ultimately +volitional. "It becomes a question," he says, "whether true causality +can be found in the phenomenal at all, and not rather in a power +beyond the phenomenal which incessantly posits and continues that +order according to rule." The unity and consistency of the immanent +will of God, then, are the ultimate metaphysical ground of all +reciprocal action. The mutual influence, that is, even <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_44" id="page_44">{44}</a></span> of +spirits, finds its final full explanation only in God.</p> + +<p>The social consciousness, therefore, so far as it is an expression +of the possibility and inevitableness of our mutual influence, is a +reflection of the immanence of the one God in the unity and +consistency of his life.</p> + +<p>But this, after all, is not the most important element of the +social consciousness. So far as it is <i>ethical</i> at all, it can +have no final explanation in the metaphysical, considered as mere +matter of fact. We are driven, therefore, to ask the second question +involved in the subject of the chapter.</p> + +<h4>II. WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR THE FINAL POSITIVE JUSTIFICATION<br /> +OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS AS ETHICAL?</h4> + +<p>1. <i>Must be Grounded in the Supporting Will of God.</i>—It is +not enough that we should be able to think of the unity of One Life +pervading all, or even of One Will upholding all. If the social +consciousness, as distinctly ethical, is to have any final +justification, it must be able to believe that it is in league with +the eternal and universal forces; that the fundamental trend of the +universe is its <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_45" +id="page_45">{45}</a></span> own trend; in other words, that the +deepest thing in the universe is an ethical purpose conceivable only +in a Person; that the ideals and purposes of finite beings expressed +in the social consciousness are in line with God's own; that the +loving holy purpose of the Infinite Will quickens and sustains and +surrounds our purposes.</p> + +<p>Let us distinctly face the fact that, unless the social +consciousness can be so grounded in the very foundation of the +universe, it must remain an illogical and unjustifiable fragment in +the world, without real excuse for being. That is, if the social +consciousness is not to be an illusion, it must be, as Professor Nash +contends, cosmical, and not merely individual, and ethics must root in +religion. This is the very heart of his stimulating book, <i>Ethics +and Revelation</i>, expressed, for example, in such sentences as +these: "Nothing save a sense of deep and intimate connection with the +solid core of things, nothing save a settled and fervid conviction +that the universe is on the side of the will in its struggle for that +whole-hearted devotion for the welfare of the race, without which +morality is an affair of shreds and patches, can give to the will the +force and edge suitable to the difficult <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_46" id="page_46">{46}</a></span> work it has to do. But +this sense of kinship with what is deepest and most abiding in the +universe—what else is meant by pure religion." And again: "We, as +founders and builders of the true society, find ourselves shut up to +an impassioned faith in the sincerity of the universe and the +integrity of the fundamental being. Our religion is a deep and wide +synthesis of feeling, whereby that personal will in us, which grounds +society, comes into solemn league and covenant with the fundamental +being. Here is the focus-point of the prophetic revelation. At this +point, the deep in God answers to the deep in Man.... All that He is +He puts in pledge for the perfecting of the society He has +founded."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_24" id="R_24" +href="#F_24">[24]</a></span></p> + +<p>Paulsen expresses only the same fundamental conviction, from the +point of view of the philosopher, and, at the same time, the heart of +his own solution of the relation between knowledge and faith, when he +says: "There is one item, at least, in which every man goes beyond +mere knowledge, beyond the registration of facts. That is his own life +and his future. His life has a meaning for him, and he directs it +toward something <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_47" +id="page_47">{47}</a></span> which does not yet exist, but which will +exist by virtue of his will. Thus a faith springs up by the side of +his knowledge. He believes in the realization of this, his life's aim, +if he is at all in earnest about it. Since, however, his aim is not an +isolated one, but is included in the historical life of a people, and +finally in that of humanity, he believes also in the future of his +people, in the victorious future of truth and righteousness and +goodness in humanity. Whoever devotes his life to a cause believes in +that cause, and this belief, be his creed what it may, has always +something of the form of a religion. Hence faith infers that an inner +connection exists between the real and the valuable within the domain +of history, and believes that in history something like an immanent +principle of reason or justice favors the right and the good, and +leads it to victory over all resisting forces." And Paulsen holds that +this implicit faith characterizes necessarily every philosophical +theory. "What the philosopher himself accepts as the highest good and +final goal he projects into the world as its good and goal, and then +believes that subsequent reflections also reveal it to him in the +world."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_25" id="R_25" +href="#F_25">[25]</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_48" +id="page_48">{48}</a></span> We must be able, then, to believe that +the best we know—our highest ideals—are at home in the world, or +give up all faith in the honesty of the world, and all hope of +philosophy, to say nothing of religion. Ultimately, now, this means +that nothing short of full Christian conviction is needed to support +the social consciousness. We need to be able to believe that the +spirit of the life and death of Christ is at the very heart of the +world. Nothing less will suffice. And this is exactly the support +which the Christian revelation offers to the social consciousness.</p> + +<p>2. <i>God's Sharing in Our Life.</i>—But if the social +consciousness is only a true reflection of God's own desire and +purpose, then in a sense far deeper than the merely metaphysical, our +life is the very life of God. He shares in it. And no man can really +see what that means, and not find a new light falling on all the +world, and himself carried on to take up a new confession of faith in +the solemn words of another: "For the agony of the world's struggle is +the very life of God. Were he mere spectator, perhaps, he too would +call life cruel. But in the unity of our lives with his, our joy is +his joy, our pain is his." And from the vision of this <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_49" id="page_49">{49}</a></span> +self-giving life of God we turn back to our own place of service, +saying with Matheson: "If Thou art love then Thy best gift must be +sacrifice; in that light let me search Thy world."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_26" id="R_26" +href="#F_26">[26]</a></span></p> + +<p>We probably cannot better express this unity of our highest ethical +life with the life of God than by renewing our old faith that we are +children of a common Father, who have come, under God's own +leading—so far as a social consciousness is ours—voluntarily to +share in God's loving purpose in the creation and redemption of men. +We do not work alone; nay, we are co-workers with God.</p> + +<p>3. <i>The Consequent Transfiguration of the Social +Consciousness.</i>—And as soon as we have thus really and deeply come +into the meaning of Christ's thought of God as Father, and into his +revelation in his life and death as to what the spirit of that +Fatherhood is, we turn back to the elements of our social +consciousness to find them all transfigured.</p> + +<p>Our <i>likeness</i> is the likeness of common children of God +reflecting the image of the one Father, capable of character and of +indefinite progress into the highest.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_50" +id="page_50">{50}</a></span> Our <i>mutual influence</i> roots in a +real Fatherhood, both in source of being and in the one purpose of +love, alike creating and redemptively working for all.</p> + +<p>Our <i>sense of the value and sacredness of the person</i> now for +the first time gets its full justification. Men are not only creatures +capable of joying and suffering, but children of God with a +preciousness to be interpreted only in the light of Christ, and with +the "power of the endless life" upon them. Concerning the value of the +person, it is worth stopping just here, to notice that it is +peculiarly true of the social consciousness, that it is not free to +ignore such considerations upon immortality as those which weighed +most with John Stuart Mill and Sully. Of the hope of immortality, Mill +says: "The beneficial influence of such a hope is far from trifling. +It makes life and human nature a far greater thing to the feelings, +and gives greater strength as well as greater solemnity to all the +sentiments which are awakened in us by our fellow-creatures, and by +mankind at large." And Sully adds: "I would only say that if men are +to abandon all hope of a future life, the loss, in point of cheering +and sustaining influence, will be a vast one, and <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_51" id="page_51">{51}</a></span> one not +to be made good, so far as I can see, by any new idea of services to +collective humanity."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_27" id="R_27" +href="#F_27">[27]</a></span></p> + +<p>Our <i>sense of obligation</i> deepens with all this deepening of +the value of men, and our conscience becomes only a true response to +God's own life and character—in no mere figurative sense the voice of +God in us.</p> + +<p>And our <i>love</i> becomes simply entering a little way into God's +own love, a sharing more and more in his life.</p> + +<p>And when one has once seen the social consciousness so transfigured +in the light of Christ's revelation, he must believe that then, for +the first time, he has seen the social consciousness at its highest, +and that it is impossible for him to go back to the lower ideal. If +the social consciousness is not an illusion, Christ's thought of God +and of the life with God ought to be true; and if the world is an +honest world, it is true. It is not only true that Christ has a social +teaching, but that the social consciousness absolutely requires +Christ's teaching for its own final justification. The Christian truth +<i>is</i> so great that it alone can give the social consciousness its +fullest <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_52" +id="page_52">{52}</a></span> meaning, alone can enable it to +understand itself, and alone can give it adequate motive and power; +for, in Keim's words, "to-day, to-morrow, and forever we can know +nothing better than that God is our Father, and that the Father is the +rest of our souls."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_28" id="R_28" +href="#F_28">[28]</a></span></p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_18" id="F_18" href="#R_18" class="label">[18]</a> +James, <i>Psychology</i>, Vol. II, pp. 367, 368. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_19" id="F_19" href="#R_19" class="label">[19]</a> +<i>The Philosophical Review</i>, May, 1896, p. 228. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_20" id="F_20" href="#R_20" class="label">[20]</a> +<i>Psychology</i>, Briefer Course, p. 461. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_21" id="F_21" href="#R_21" class="label">[21]</a> +<i>Microcosmus</i>, Vol. II, p. 599. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_22" id="F_22" href="#R_22" class="label">[22]</a> +See King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, pp. 54, 84, 102. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_23" id="F_23" href="#R_23" class="label">[23]</a> +<i>Theory of Thought and Knowledge</i>, pp. 91, 111. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_24" id="F_24" href="#R_24" class="label">[24]</a> +<i>Ethics and Revelation</i>, pp. 50, 243, 244. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_25" id="F_25" href="#R_25" class="label">[25]</a> +<i>Introduction to Philosophy</i>, pp. 8, 9, 313. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_26" id="F_26" href="#R_26" class="label">[26]</a> +<i>Searchings in the Silence</i>, p. 46. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_27" id="F_27" href="#R_27" class="label">[27]</a> +Quoted by Orr, <i>The Christian View of God and the World</i>, pp. +160, 72. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_28" id="F_28" href="#R_28" class="label">[28]</a> +Quoted by Bruce, <i>The Kingdom of God</i>, p. 157. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_53" +id="page_53">{53}</a></span></p> + + +<h2>THE INFLUENCE OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS<br /> +UPON THE CONCEPTION OF RELIGION</h2> +<h3>INTRODUCTION</h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">From</span> the question of the support which +Christian faith and doctrine give to the social consciousness, we turn +now to the second part of our inquiry: How does this growing social +consciousness, not by any means always consciously religious, +naturally react upon and affect our conceptions of religion and of +theological doctrines?</p> + +<p>In this inquiry, we cannot always be sure historically of the exact +connection, and, for our present purpose, this is not of prime +importance. But we can see, for example, in this second division of +our theme, the relations of religion and the social consciousness, and +how religion must be conceived if the social consciousness is fully +warranted; and this is the main question.</p> + +<p>If the definition of theology which has <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_54" id="page_54">{54}</a></span> been suggested be +adopted—the thoughtful and unified expression of what religion means +to us—then it is obvious that any change in conception or emphasis in +religion will necessarily affect theological statement. Our inquiry as +to the influence of the social consciousness, therefore, naturally +begins with religion.</p> + +<p>The discussions of this division, moreover, will really include all +that part of theological doctrine which has to do with the growth into +the life with God.</p> + +<p>The natural influence of the social consciousness upon the +conception of religion may be, perhaps, summed up in four points, +which form the subjects of the four succeeding chapters: (1) The +social consciousness tends to draw religion away from the falsely +mystical; (2) it tends to emphasize the personal relation in religion, +and so keeps the truly mystical; (3) it tends to emphasize the ethical +in religion; (4) it tends to emphasize the concretely historically +Christian in religion.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_55" +id="page_55">{55}</a></span></p> + +<h3>CHAPTER V<br /><br /> <span class="h90"><i>THE OPPOSITION +OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS TO<br />THE FALSELY +MYSTICAL</i></span></h3> + +<h4>I. WHAT IS THE FALSELY MYSTICAL?</h4> + +<p><span class="smcap">Two</span> very clear answers made from +different points of view deserve attention.</p> + +<p>1. <i>Nash's Definition.</i>—In trying to set forth the "main mood +and motives of religious speculation" in the early Christian +centuries, Professor Nash takes, as perhaps the two strongest +influences in determining the type of man to whom Christian +apologetics had then to appeal, Philo and Plotinus, and says: "By what +road shall the mind enter into a deep and intimate knowledge of God? +That is the decisive question. Plotinus the Gentile and Philo the Jew +are at one in their answer. The reason must rise above reasoning. It +must pass into a state that is half a swoon and half an ecstasy before +it can truly know God. Philo gave up for the sake of his theory, the +position of the prophets. Plotinus, for the same theory, <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_56" id="page_56">{56}</a></span> forsook +the position of Plato and Aristotle. The prophets conceived the inmost +essence of things, the being and will of God, as a creative and +redemptive force that guided and revealed itself through the career of +a great national community. Plato and Aristotle conceived the essence +of life as a labor of reason; and, for them, the labors of reason +found their sufficient refreshment and inspiration in those moments of +clear synthesis which are the reward of patient analysis. Revelation +came to the prophet through his experience of history. To the +philosopher it came through hard and steady thinking. But Philo and +Plotinus together declared these roads to be no thoroughfares. The +Greek and the Jew met on the common ground of a mysticism that +sacrificed the needs of sober reason and the needs of the nation to +the necessities of the monk."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_29" +id="R_29" href="#F_29">[29]</a></span> Mysticism is here conceived as +unethical, unhistorical, and unrational.</p> + +<p>2. <i>Herrmann's Definition.</i>—Herrmann's definition of +mysticism is the second one to which attention is directed. He says: +"When the influence of God upon the soul is sought and found solely in +an inward experience of the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_57" +id="page_57">{57}</a></span> individual; when certain excitements of +the emotions are taken, with no further question, as evidence that the +soul is possessed by God; when, at the same time, nothing external to +the soul is consciously and clearly perceived and firmly grasped; when +no thoughts that elevate the spiritual life are aroused by the +positive contents of an idea that rules the soul—then that is the +piety of mysticism. He who seeks in this wise that for the sake of +which he is ready to abandon all beside, has stepped beyond the pale +of Christian piety. He leaves Christ and Christ's Kingdom altogether +behind him when he enters that sphere of experience which seems to him +to be the highest."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_30" id="R_30" +href="#F_30">[30]</a></span> The marks of mysticism for Herrmann, +then, are: that it is purely subjective; that it is merely emotional +and unethical; and hence that it has no clear object, and is abstract, +unrational, unhistorical, and so unchristian.</p> + +<h4>II. THE OBJECTIONS OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS<br /> +TO THE FALSELY MYSTICAL</h4> + +<p>Against this neo-platonic, falsely mystical conception of religion, +the social consciousness <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_58" +id="page_58">{58}</a></span> seems to be clearly arrayed, and, so far +as the social consciousness influences religion, it will certainly +tend to draw it away from this falsely mystical idea.</p> + +<p>1. <i>Unethical.</i>—For, in the first place, this neo-platonic +conception of religion has nothing distinctly ethical in it. The +ethical is manifestly not made the test of true religious experience, +as it is in the New Testament. The social consciousness, on the other +hand, is predominantly and emphatically ethical, and can have nothing +to do with a religion in which ethics is either omitted or is wholly +subordinate. At this point, therefore, the pressure of the social +consciousness is strongly against a neo-platonic mysticism.</p> + +<p>2. <i>Does not Give a Real Personal God.</i>—In the second place, +the social consciousness cannot get along with the falsely mystical, +because it does not give a real personal God. Let us be clear upon +this point. Is not Herrmann right when he says that all that can be +said of the God of this mysticism is "that he is not the world? Now +that is precisely all that mysticism has ever been able to say of God +as it conceives him. Plainly, the world and the conception of it are +all that moves the soul while it thinks thus of God. Only <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_59" id="page_59">{59}</a></span> +disappointment can ensue to the soul whose yearning for God in such +case keeps on insisting that God must be something utterly different +from the world. If such a soul will reflect awhile on the nature of +the God thus reached, the fact must inevitably come to the surface +that its whole consciousness is occupied with the world now as it was +before, for evidently it has grasped no positive ideas—nothing but +negative ideas—about anything else. Mysticism frequently passes into +pantheism for this very reason, even in men of the highest religious +energy; they refuse to be satisfied with the mere longing after God, +or to remain on the way to him, but determine to reach the goal +itself, and rest with God himself."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_31" id="R_31" href="#F_31">[31]</a></span></p> + +<p>Now we have already seen that the social consciousness can find +adequate support and power and motive only in faith that its purpose +is God's purpose, that the deepest thing in the universe is an ethical +purpose, conceivable only in a personal God; and, therefore, neither +an empty negation nor pantheism can ever satisfy it.</p> + +<p>3. <i>Belittles the Personal in Man.</i>—The false mysticism, +moreover, belittles the personal in <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_60" id="page_60">{60}</a></span> man as well as in God; for +it does not treat with real reverence either the personality, the +ethical freedom, the sense of obligation, or the reason of man. This +whole thought of "a state that is half a swoon and half an ecstasy" is +a sort of swamping of clear self-consciousness and definite moral +initiative, in which the very reality of man's personality consists. +It is a heathen, not a Christian, idea of inspiration which demands +the suppression of the human, whether in consciousness, in will, in +reason, or by belittling the sense of obligation to others. But +mysticism has at least tended toward failure in all these +respects.</p> + +<p>And yet, from the time that Paul argued with the Corinthians +against their immense overestimation of the gift of speaking with +tongues, this fascination of the merely mystical has been felt in +Christianity. (1) The very mystery and unintelligibility of the +experience, (2) its ecstatic emotion, (3) its sense of being +controlled by a power beyond one's self, and (4) its contrast with +ordinary life—all these elements make the mystical experience seem to +most all the more divine, although in so judging they are applying a +pagan, not a Christian, standard. So far as these experiences <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_61" id="page_61">{61}</a></span> have +value, it is probably due to the strong and realistic sense which they +give of being in the presence of an overpowering being. If thoroughly +permeated and dominated with other elements, this sense is not without +its value.</p> + +<p>But it is interesting to notice that, although Paul does not deny +the legitimacy of the gift of speaking with tongues, he nevertheless +absolutely subordinates it, and insists that the most ecstatic +religious emotions are completely worthless without love. Evidently +the considerations which weighed most with the Corinthians in valuing +the gift of unintelligible ecstatic utterance weighed little with +Paul; and one can see how Paul implicitly argues against each of those +considerations: (1) God is not an unknown, mystic force, but the +definite, concrete God of character, shown in Christ. (2) He speaks to +reason and will as well as to feeling, and he best speaks to feeling +when he speaks to the whole man. True religious emotion must have a +rational basis and must move to duty. (3) Religion, he would urge, is +a self-controlled and voluntary surrender to a personal God of +character, not a passive being swept away by an unknown emotion. (4) +God has most to give, be assured, <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_62" id="page_62">{62}</a></span> he would have added, in +the <i>common</i> ways of life.</p> + +<p>Now, in every one of these protests, the social consciousness +instinctively joins. It cannot rest in a conception of religion that +belittles the personal in God or man; for it is itself an emphatic +insistence upon the fully personal. And it can, least of all, get on +with the mystical ignoring of the rational and the ethical, for it +holds that the social evolution moves steadily on to a rational +like-mindedness, and to a definitely ethical civilization. Giddings +puts the sociological conclusion in a sentence: "It is the rational, +ethical consciousness that maintains social cohesion in a progressive +democracy."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_32" id="R_32" +href="#F_32">[32]</a></span> Now that which is clearly recognized as +the goal in the relations of man to man will not be set aside as +unwarranted or subordinate in the relations of man to God. And we may +depend upon it.</p> + +<p>4. <i>Leaves the Historically, Concretely Christian.</i>—Once +more, the social consciousness cannot approve of the mystical +conception of religion in its ignoring, in its highest state, the +historically and concretely Christian. With mysticism's subjective, +emotional, and <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_63" +id="page_63">{63}</a></span> abstract conception of the highest +communion with God, and of the way thereto, the historical and +concrete at best can be to it only subordinate means, more or less +mysteriously connected with the attainment of the goal, and left +behind when once the goal is reached.</p> + +<p>The social consciousness, on the other hand, requires historical +justification, and definitely builds on the facts of the historical +social evolution.</p> + +<p>In the case of the prophets and psalmists, for example, who alone +in the ancient world most fully anticipated the modern social feeling, +the social consciousness plainly arose in the face of the concrete +historical life of a people. No result of modern Old Testament +criticism is more certain. So that, speaking of "the religious aspects +of the social struggle in Israel," McCurdy can use this strong +language: "It is not too much to say that this conflict, intense, +uninterrupted, and prolonged, is the very heart of the religion of the +Old Testament, its most regenerative and propulsive movement. To the +personal life of the soul, the only basis of a potential, world-moving +religion, it gave energy and depth, assurance and hopefulness, repose +and <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_64" +id="page_64">{64}</a></span> self-control, with an outlook clear and +eternal."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_33" id="R_33" +href="#F_33">[33]</a></span> But it was this standpoint of the +prophets that the falsely mystical conception of religion abandoned. +We may well take to heart, in our estimate of mysticism, the gradual +but steady elimination of ecstasy in the development of Israel, and +its practically total absence in those we count in the highest sense +prophets.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_34" id="R_34" +href="#F_34">[34]</a></span></p> + +<p>The social consciousness, moreover, has almost entirely to do with +men, and hence naturally must lay stress on human history, rather than +on nature, as a source of religious ideas. Indeed, it will have no +doubt that what nature is made to mean religiously will be chiefly +determined by the prevalent social ideals. It can, therefore, least of +all ignore the historical in Christianity.</p> + +<p>The social consciousness recognizes increasingly, too, with the +clearing of its own ideals and with the deepening study of the +teaching of Jesus, that it really is only demanding, in the concrete, +and in detailed application to particular problems, and to all of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_65" id="page_65">{65}</a></span> +them, the spirit shown in its fullness only in Christ, as Professor +Peabody's eminently sane treatment of the social teaching of Jesus +seems to me fairly to have proven. The social consciousness, +therefore, cannot help becoming more and more consciously and +emphatically Christian.</p> + +<p>In a single sentence, because of the steps of its own long +evolution, the social consciousness instinctively distrusts the highly +emotional, unless it is manifestly under equally strong rational +control, and unless it has equal ethical insight and power, and is +historically justified. It tends, therefore, necessarily to draw away +from the falsely mystical in religion, which is lacking in all these +respects.</p> + +<p>And the same reasons, which array the social consciousness against +the falsely mystical in religion, lead it into natural sympathy with a +positive emphasis upon the personal, the ethical, and the historically +concretely Christian in religion.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_29" id="F_29" href="#R_29" class="label">[29]</a> +Nash, <i>Ethics and Revelation</i>, p. 33. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_30" id="F_30" href="#R_30" class="label">[30]</a> +Herrmann, <i>The Communion of the Christian with God</i>, pp. 19, 20. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_31" id="F_31" href="#R_31" class="label">[31]</a> +Herrmann, <i>Op. cit.</i>, p. 27. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_32" id="F_32" href="#R_32" class="label">[32]</a> +Giddings, <i>Elements of Sociology</i>, p. 321; cf. also pp. 155 ff, +302, 320, 327. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_33" id="F_33" href="#R_33" class="label">[33]</a> +McCurdy, <i>History, Prophecy, and the Monuments</i>, Vol. II, p. +223; cf. pp. 214, ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_34" id="F_34" href="#R_34" class="label">[34]</a> +G. A. Smith, <i>The Book of the Twelve Prophets</i>, Vol. I, pp. 30, +84, 89; Cornill, <i>The Prophets of Israel</i>, pp. 41, 46; <i>The +Expository Times</i>, Jan., Feb., 1902, article, <i>Prophetic +Ecstasy</i>. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_66" +id="page_66">{66}</a></span></p> + + +<h3>CHAPTER VI<br /><br /> <span class="h90"><i>THE EMPHASIS +OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS UPON <br />THE PERSONAL RELATION IN +RELIGION, AND<br />SO UPON THE TRULY MYSTICAL</i></span></h3> + +<h4>I. THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS TENDS POSITIVELY TO EMPHASIZE<br /> +THE PERSONAL RELATION IN RELIGION</h4> + +<p>1. <i>Emphasizes Everywhere the Personal.</i>—The social +consciousness sees man as preëminently the social animal, made for +personal relations, irrevocably and essentially knit up with other +persons. It deepens everywhere our sense of persons and of personal +relations. It may be itself almost defined as the sense of the fully +personal.</p> + +<p>Religion, then, if it is to be most real to men of the social +consciousness, must be personally conceived, that is, must be +distinctly seen to be a personal relation of man to God. And this +conception, as the highest we can reach, is to be followed fearlessly +to the end; only guarding it against wrong inferences from the simple +transference to God of finite conditions, and recognizing exactly in +what <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_67" +id="page_67">{67}</a></span> respects the personal relation to God is +unique.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_35" id="R_35" +href="#F_35">[35]</a></span></p> + +<p>The social consciousness, moreover, as we have seen, must have a +conception of religion that can really justify the social +consciousness, and, therefore, must do justice to the fully personal +in God and man; and this need also leads the social consciousness +naturally to the conception of religion as a personal relation.</p> + +<p>2. <i>Requires the Laws of a Deepening Friendship in +Religion.</i>—When this conception is carried out, it is found that +growth in the religious life, in communion with God, follows the laws +of a deepening friendship.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_36" +id="R_36" href="#F_36">[36]</a></span> These laws can, therefore, be +known and studied and formulated; and religion, at the same time, +ceases to be unintelligible and ceases to be isolated—cut off from +the rest of life, and becomes rather that one great fundamental +relation which gives being and meaning and value to all the rest. In +absolute harmony, then, with the genesis of the social consciousness, +religion, in this conception, is bound up with the whole of life; and +we catch a glimpse of the real and final unity <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_68" id="page_68">{68}</a></span> of life +in true love, the relation to God and the relation to man each helping +everywhere the other. If religion is truly a personal relation, and +its laws are those of a deepening friendship, then every human +relation, heartily and truly fulfilled, becomes a new outlook on God, +a revelation of new possibilities in the religious life. And, on the +other hand, in that mutual self-revelation and answering trust upon +which every growing personal relation is built, every fresh revelation +of God is an enlarging of our ideal for our relations to others. Even +biblical literature, perhaps, furnishes no more perfect example of the +interplay of the human and divine relations than Hosea's account of +his own providential leading through the human relation into the +divine, and back again from the divine to a still better human.</p> + +<p>3. <i>Requires the Ideal Conditions of the Richest Life in +Religion.</i>—And if religion is to be justified in its supreme +claims by the social consciousness, it must be felt to offer, besides, +the ideal conditions of the richest life. As a personal relation to +God, religion need not shrink from this test. Our great needs are +character and happiness. Psychology seems to me to point to two great +means and to <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_69" +id="page_69">{69}</a></span> two accompanying conditions of both +character and happiness. The means are association and work; the +corresponding conditions are reverence for personality, and +objectivity—the mood of both love and work. The great essentials, +therefore, to the richest life are (1) association in which +personality is respected, and (2) work in which one can lose himself. +Now, when would these conditions become ideal? On the one hand, as to +association, when the association is with him who is of the highest +character and of the infinitely richest life, and relation to whom is +fundamental to every other personal relation; when, secondly, God is +made concrete and real to us in an adequate personal revelation of his +character, and of his love toward us; and when, third, the association +is individualized for each one, who throws himself open to God, in +God's spiritual presence in us, constantly and intimately, and yet +<i>unobtrusively</i>, coöperating with us. And, on the other hand, as +to work, when the work is God-given work, to which one is set apart, +and in which he may lose himself with joy. These are the ideal +conditions of the richest life. Just these ideal conditions Jesus +declared actualities. For the fulfilment of just these, in the case +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_70" id="page_70">{70}</a></span> +of his disciples, he prayed in his double petition,—"Keep them," +"Sanctify them," "Keep them in thy name," that is, through the divine +association. "Sanctify them"—set them apart unto their God-given +work. "As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent +them into the world." Such a conception of religion can fairly claim +to meet, broadly and deeply, the most exacting demands of the social +consciousness for emphasis upon the personal relation in religion.</p> + +<h4>II. THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS THUS KEEPS THE TRULY MYSTICAL</h4> + +<p>I have no predilection for the term mystical, and would gladly +confine it to what I have termed the neo-platonic or falsely mystical, +were it not that, in spite of the dictionaries and the histories of +philosophy and the histories of doctrine, the term is used in two +quite different senses. Many, it seems to me, are defending what they +call the mystical in religion, who have no idea of defending what +Herrmann and Nash call mystical. And many, on the other hand, are +defending and teaching the falsely mystical through an undefined fear +that else they will lose the truly <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_71" id="page_71">{71}</a></span> mystical. Theology and +religion both greatly need a clear discrimination of terms here. Many +are involved, in both living and thinking, in a self-contradiction, +which they feel but cannot state; and are urging with themselves and +with others a means of religious life and a corresponding method of +conception, which really contradict their highest convictions in other +lines of life and thought. Can we find our way out of this +confusion?</p> + +<p>If one studies carefully the historical representatives of +mysticism, and especially such a strong type as Jacob Böhme, whom +Erdmann calls the "culmination of mysticism," and still keeps his +head, certain dangers in mysticism, it would seem, must become +apparent. And it may be worth while to attempt a brief, but definite, +analysis of the justifiable and unjustifiable elements in these +mystical movements.</p> + +<p>1. <i>The Justifiable and Unjustifiable Elements in +Mysticism.</i>—(1) The first danger in mysticism seems to me to be +the tendency to make simple emotion the supreme test of the religious +state. Whether this emotion is thought of as ecstatic—such as some of +the old mystics called "being drunk with God," or, as quietistic—in +which imperturbability, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_72" +id="page_72">{72}</a></span> passionlessness, become the highest +good—is comparatively indifferent. The justifiable element here is +the insistence that religion is real and is life; for feeling is +perhaps the most powerful element in the sense of reality. So James +says: "Speaking generally, the more a conceived object excites us, the +more reality it has."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_37" id="R_37" +href="#F_37">[37]</a></span> The unjustifiable element is the perilous +subjection of the rational and ethical. Such a view must always lack +any positive and adequate conception of our active life and vocation +in the world.</p> + +<p>(2) A second closely connected danger in mysticism is the tendency +toward mere subjectivism. There is here a justifiable element in the +emphasis on one's own personal conviction and faith; an unjustifiable +element in the tendency to underrate anything but the purely +subjective, to ignore all correcting influences from others, from the +church, and from the Scriptures.</p> + +<p>(3) A third danger follows from this: the marked tendency to +underestimate the historical. The justifiable element here is, again, +the emphasis on personal conviction and faith; the unjustifiable +element is the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_73" +id="page_73">{73}</a></span> tendency toward the greatest +one-sidedness, and toward emptiness, especially of ethical content. +Advising our young people simply to "listen to God," without the +strongest insistence upon the historical revelation of God at the same +time, is exposing them to the great danger of mistaking for an +indubitable, divine revelation the veriest vagary that may chance in +their empty-mindedness next to come into their thought. With the +reason in supposed abeyance, the door is thus thrown open to the +grossest superstitions. Honest attempts to deepen the religious life +may thus become dangerous assaults upon true religion.</p> + +<p>(4) A fourth danger in mysticism is so strong a tendency toward +vagueness, that the common mind is not without warrant in identifying +mysticism and mistiness. The justifiable element here is in the real +difficulty of expressing the full content of the entire religious +experience; the unjustifiable element is, once more, the slighting of +the historical, the ethical, and the rational, especially in talking +much of the contradictions of reason, and of what is above reason. +Mysticism naturally lacks positive content.</p> + +<p>(5) Another danger—the tendency toward <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_74" id="page_74">{74}</a></span> pantheism—comes in +partly, as Herrmann has suggested, as a meeting of this lack of +content, and partly as the logical outcome of such an insistence upon +losing oneself in God as amounts to a being swept out of one's self—a +loss of clear and rational self-consciousness, which is next +interpreted speculatively as a real absorption in God, and is then +made the goal. This is the familiar road of Indian and neo-platonic +mysticism, and its phenomena are real enough, but probably of only the +slightest religious significance. Tennyson tells somewhere of the +immense sense of illumination that came to him once from simply +repeating monotonously his own name—"Alfred Tennyson, Alfred +Tennyson." This may be as effective as looking at the end of one's +nose and ceaselessly reiterating "Om," as does the Hindu ascetic. A +still shorter and more certain method is through nitrous-oxide-gas +intoxication, of which Professor James says: "With me, as with every +other person of whom I have heard, the key-note of the experience is +the tremendously exciting sense of an intense metaphysical +illumination. Truth lies open to the view in depth beneath depth of +almost blinding evidence. The mind sees all the <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_75" id="page_75">{75}</a></span> logical +relations of being with an apparent subtlety and instantaneity, to +which its normal consciousness offers no parallel; only as sobriety +returns, the feeling of insight fades, and one is left staring +vacantly at a few disjointed words and phrases as one stares at a +cadaverous-looking snow-peak from which the sunset glow has just fled, +or at the black cinder left by an extinguished brand." "The immense +emotional sense of reconciliation," he felt to be the characteristic +mood. "It is impossible to convey," he says, "an idea of the +torrential character of the identification of opposites as it streams +through the mind in this experience."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_38" id="R_38" href="#F_38">[38]</a></span></p> + +<p>Now it is not safe to ignore such facts, when we are seriously +trying to estimate the religious significance of intense emotional +experiences, the reality of which we need not at all question. The +vital question is, not that of the reality of the experiences, but +that of the real cause of the experiences; and the only possible test +of this is rational and ethical. But from this test, mysticism tends +from the start to shut itself off, and so, assuming the experience to +be truly religious, ends often in virtual pantheism. + +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_76" id="page_76">{76}</a></span> +The justifiable element in this insistence upon absorption in God is +the necessary moral relation of complete surrender to God. The +unjustifiable element is in belittling the personal in both God and +man, and in making essentially religious an experience that has almost +nothing of the rational and ethical in it, and that, on that very +account, fosters the irreverent familiarity with Christ so deplored by +more than one careful student of mysticism. A natural and common and +most dangerous accompaniment of such an intense emotional experience +is the tendency afterward, to excuse sin in oneself. In the case of +the most conscientious, it is worth noting, such an emphasis upon +intense experiences tends to lead them to distrust the reality of the +normal Christian experience if they have not had these intense +emotions, or if they have had them, tends to bring them into despair +when they find these marked experiences actually proving less powerful +in effects upon life than they had expected.</p> + +<p>(6) The last danger in mysticism, to which reference will be made, +is the tendency to extravagant symbolism. This is closely connected +with "the immense emotional sense of reconciliation," and is much +stronger by <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_77" +id="page_77">{77}</a></span> nature in some than in others. The born +mystic finds his own subjective views symbolized everywhere, and is in +grave danger of being led into an ingenious, practically unconscious +intellectual dishonesty. The justifiable element here is that sense of +the unity and worth of things which is the most fundamental conviction +of our minds. The unjustifiable element has been sufficiently +indicated.</p> + +<p>The justifiable elements in mysticism, then, may be said to +include: the insistence on the legitimate place of feeling in religion +as a real and vital experience; the emphasis on one's own conviction +and faith; the real difficulty of expressing the full meaning of the +religious experience; the demand for a complete ethical surrender to +God; and the faith in the real unity and worth of the world in God. +Now if one tries to bring together these justifiable elements in +mysticism, the truly mystical may all be summed up as simply a protest +in favor of the whole man—the entire personality. It says that men +can experience and live and feel and do much more than they can +logically formulate, define, explain, or even fully express. Living is +more than thinking.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_78" +id="page_78">{78}</a></span> 2. <i>The Protest in Favor of the Whole +Man.</i>—The element to which mysticism has tried most to do justice +is feeling, and so it has been liable to a new and dangerous +one-sidedness. But the truly mystical must be a protest alike against +a narrow juiceless intellectualism, against a narrow moralistic +rigorism, and against a blind and spineless sentimentalism. It is a +protest particularly against making the mathematico-mechanical view of +the world the only view; against making logical consistency the sole +test of truth or reality; against ignoring all data, except those +which come through the intellect alone; that is, against trying to +make a part, not the whole, of man the standard; in other words, +against ignoring the data which come through feeling and +will—emotional, æsthetic, ethical, and religious data, as well as +those judgments of worth which underlie reason's theoretical +determinations.</p> + +<p>Man stands, in fact, everywhere face to face with an actual world +of great complexity, that seems to him at first what James says the +baby's world is, "one big blooming buzzing confusion;" "and the +universe of all of us is still to a great extent such a confusion, +potentially resolvable, and demanding to be <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_79" id="page_79">{79}</a></span> resolved, but not yet +actually resolved, into parts."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_39" +id="R_39" href="#F_39">[39]</a></span> In one sense, man's whole task +is to think unity and order into this confusion. The problem really +becomes that of thinking the universe through in several kinds of +terms, and then finally bringing all together into one comprehensive +view. All these are alike ideals which the mind sets before itself. +The easiest of these problems is the attempt to think the world +through, in mathematico-mechanical terms. But the attempt to think the +world through in æsthetic or ethical or religious terms is equally +legitimate, though it is more difficult. Not only, then, is the +mathematico-mechanical view not the sole justifiable view, but it +really has its justification in an ideal, and success in this attempt +affords just encouragement for the hope of success in the other more +difficult problems.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_40" id="R_40" +href="#F_40">[40]</a></span></p> + +<p>The truly mystical holds, then, that the narrow intellectualism is +unwarranted, because natural science, the mechanical view of the +world, is itself an ideal—the "child of duties," as Münsterberg calls +it—and so cannot legitimately rule out other ideals; <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_80" id="page_80">{80}</a></span> because +we have just as immediate a conviction concerning the worth, as +concerning the logical consistency of the world; because a narrow +intellectualism would make conscious life but a "barren rehearsal" of +the outer world, without significance; because if we can trust the +indications of our intellect, we ought to be able to trust the +indications of the rest of our nature; and because, thus, the only +possible key and standard of truth and reality are in ourselves—the +whole self, and "necessities of thought" become necessities of a +reason which means loyally to take account of all the data of the +entire man.</p> + +<p>And the same point may be thus stated. We use the word rational in +two quite distinct senses: in the narrow sense, as meaning simply the +intellectual; in the broad sense, as indicating the demands of the +entire man. The true mysticism stands for the broadly rational.</p> + +<p>So, too, we speak of the necessary fundamental assumption of the +honesty or sincerity of the world; but this includes two quite +distinct propositions: one, that the world must be thinkable, +conceivable, construable, a logically consistent whole, a sphere for +rational thinking,—where the test is consistency; the other, that the +world must be worth while, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_81" +id="page_81">{81}</a></span> must not mock our highest ideals and +aspirations, must in some true and genuine sense satisfy the whole +man, be a sphere for rational living,—where the test is worth. All +our arguments go forward upon these two assumptions. Now, a true +mysticism contends that the second principle is as rational as the +first, though it must be freely granted that it is not as easy to +employ it for detailed conclusions, and it is consequently much more +liable to abuse. The true mysticism wishes to be not less, but more, +rational. It knows no shorthand substitute for the hard and steady +thinking of the philosopher, or for the historical experience of the +prophet; it needs and uses both.</p> + +<p>In all this, it is plain that the truly mystical is a legitimate +outgrowth of the emphasis of the social consciousness upon recognition +of the entire personality. Phillips Brooks finds just this in the +intellectual life of Jesus. "The great fact concerning it is this," he +says, "that in him the intellect never works alone. You never can +separate its workings from the complete operation of the entire +nature. He never simply knows, but always loves and resolves at the +same time."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_41" id="R_41" +href="#F_41">[41]</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_82" +id="page_82">{82}</a></span> 3. <i>The Self-Controlled Recognition of +Emotion.</i>—Moreover, it probably may be fairly claimed that all of +the mystical recognition of the emotional which is valuable or even +legitimate, is preserved, and far more safely and sanely conceived, in +a strictly personal conception of religion. It may well be doubted, if +it is possible in any other way, both to do justice to feeling in +religion, and at the same time to keep feeling in its proper place. Is +it possible briefly to indicate both the recognition of emotion and +the control of emotion in religion?</p> + +<p>The true mysticism recognizes that the supreme joy is "joy in +personal life"—joy in entering into the revelation of a person; and +it believes with reason that a growing acquaintance with God must have +such heights and depths of meaning as no other personal relation can +have. It is not, therefore, afraid or distrustful of true emotion—of +joy or peace, of intense longing or of keen satisfaction—in the +religious life.</p> + +<p>But the true mysticism knows at the same time that deep revelation +of a person is made only to the reverent, that the conditions are in +the highest degree ethical, and above all must be recognized to be so +in religion. It <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_83" +id="page_83">{83}</a></span> does view, then, with deep distrust an +emotional emphasis in religion that ignores the ethical. It cannot +forget that Christ thought that everything must be tested by its +fruits in life. Paul, too, insisted on applying the test of an active +ministering love to the highly valued emotional experiences of the +Corinthians; and writes to the Galatians that there is but one +infallible proof of the working of the Spirit in them—a righteous +life: "love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, +meekness, temperance."</p> + +<p>And a true mysticism knows that the spirit, reverent of +personality, leads to a self-restraint that does not seek the +emotional experience simply as such on <i>any</i> conditions; but, +knowing the supreme psychological conditions of happiness and +character and influence, it loses itself in an unselfish love and in +absorbing work, and understands that it must simply let the +experiences come. It will have nothing, therefore, to do with strained +emotion, or with the working up of feeling for its own sake. It seeks +health, not merely the signs of health. It prizes, therefore, the joy +that simply proclaims itself as the sign of the normal life and so +positively strengthens and <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_84" +id="page_84">{84}</a></span> cheers, but it will have nothing of the +strain of emotion which is drain.</p> + +<p>It is interesting to notice that it is exactly this true +psychological attitude concerning the emotional life that Phillips +Brooks believed that he found perfectly reflected in Jesus. "The +sensitiveness of Jesus to pain and joy," he says, "never leads him for +a moment to try to be sad or happy with direct endeavor; nor, is there +any sign that he ever judges the real character of himself or any +other man by the sadness or the happiness that for the moment covers +his life. He simply lives, and joy and sorrow issue from his living, +and cast their brightness and their gloominess back upon his life; but +there is no sorrow and no joy that he ever sought for itself, and he +always kept a self-knowledge underneath the joy or sorrow, undisturbed +by the moment's happiness or unhappiness."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_42" id="R_42" href="#F_42">[42]</a></span></p> + +<p>How far from this objectivity and this healthful emotional life is +the atmosphere of most of our devotional books, and, one might say, of +all the manuals of ordinary mysticism! That this difficulty should +confront us in devotional literature is very natural; for such writing +commonly aims to give the emotional <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_85" id="page_85">{85}</a></span> sense of reality in +religion; and is, therefore, particularly under the temptation to show +and to produce a straining after the emotion, as for its own sake. +Moreover, the very introspection, almost inevitably involved in the +reading and writing of devotional books, tends to bring about an +artificial change in the religious experience, and so to introduce +into it the abnormal.</p> + +<p>But the social consciousness, so far as it affects religion, not +only tends to draw away from the falsely mystical, and to emphasize +the personal, and so to keep the truly mystical, but it is even more +plain that it must tend to insist upon the ethical in religion.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_35" id="F_35" href="#R_35" class="label">[35]</a> +Cf. King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, p. 201 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_36" id="F_36" href="#R_36" class="label">[36]</a> +<i>Op. cit.</i>, pp. 210 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_37" id="F_37" href="#R_37" class="label">[37]</a> +James, <i>Psychology</i>, Vol. II, p. 307. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_38" id="F_38" href="#R_38" class="label">[38]</a> +James, <i>The Will to Believe</i>, pp. 294, 295. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_39" id="F_39" href="#R_39" class="label">[39]</a> +<i>Psychology</i>, Briefer Course, p. 16. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_40" id="F_40" href="#R_40" class="label">[40]</a> +Cf. James, <i>Psychology</i>, Vol. II, 633-677; especially 633, 634, +667, 671, 677; Münsterberg, <i>Psychology and Life</i>, pp. 23-28. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_41" id="F_41" href="#R_41" class="label">[41]</a> +Brooks, <i>The Influence of Jesus</i>, p. 219. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_42" id="F_42" href="#R_42" class="label">[42]</a> +<i>The Influence of Jesus</i>, p. 156. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_86" +id="page_86">{86}</a></span></p> + +<h3>CHAPTER VII<br /><br /> <span class="h90"><i>THE THOROUGH +ETHICIZING OF RELIGION</i></span></h3> + +<h4>I. THE PRESSURE OF THE PROBLEM</h4> + +<p><span class="smcap">The</span> social consciousness looks to the +thorough ethicizing of religion. If the social consciousness is to be +regarded as historically justified, it must believe that this growing +sense of brotherhood and consequent obligation is simply our response +to the on-working of God's own plan, God's own will expressing itself +in us. The purpose to recognize the will of God, thus necessarily +involves the recognition of human relations, since, as soon as +conscience is strongly stirred in any direction, religion can but +feel, in this demand of conscience, the demand of God, and, therefore, +must bring the convictions of the social consciousness into religion. +Indeed, it may be well believed that Kaftan is right in his insistence +that it is exactly through the practical, that is, in the realm of the +ethical, that knowledge arises from faith.<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_43" id="R_43" href="#F_43">[43]</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_87" +id="page_87">{87}</a></span> In any case, it is evident that the old +problem of faith and works, of religion and ethics, of the first and +second commandments, meets us here in a way not to be put aside. With +an ethical demand so insistent as that of the social consciousness no +religion can be at peace that is not with equal insistence ethical. We +are bound, then, to show how communion with God, the supreme desire to +find God, necessarily carries with it active love for men. We must +show how we truly commune with God in such active service. The social +consciousness, thus, positively thrusts upon every religious man, who +believes in it, the problem of the thorough ethicizing of religion. +Or, to put the matter in a slightly different way, if the sense of the +value and the sacredness of the person is one of the two greatest +moral convictions of our time, then religion must be clearly seen to +hold this conviction, or lose its connection with what is most real +and vital to us. This is the problem.</p> + +<h4>II. THE STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM</h4> + +<p>All will probably agree that religion is communion with God. We +have seen why the social consciousness cannot accept a falsely <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_88" id="page_88">{88}</a></span> +mystical view of that communion. For similar reasons, it must make +absolutely subordinate all non-ethical and simply mysterious means +which make no appeal to the conscience and to the reason—the falsely +sacramental. Only the person is truly sacramental. Much else may be of +value, but the touch of personal life is the only absolute essential +in religion. We have seen, also, why the social consciousness tends to +regard religion as a strictly personal relation.</p> + +<p>Our problem thus becomes: How does the desire for personal relation +with God, the desire for God himself, lead directly into the ethical +life—into the full and practical recognition of the ethical demands +of the social consciousness?</p> + +<p>To guard against any possible misconception, it is, perhaps, well +to say at the start that the desire for a personal relation with God +has no purpose of returning by another route to the false position of +mysticism, in the claim of special private revelations that are +exclusively for it. It expects, rather, personal conviction of that +great revelation that is common to all, and, moreover, it knows well +that no personal relation is essentially sensuous, and it certainly +looks for no sensuous relation to God.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_89" +id="page_89">{89}</a></span> It may be worth while, too, to reverse +our question for a moment, and ask how morality necessarily involves +religion. The true moral life is the fulfilment of all personal +relations, and as such can least of all omit the greatest and most +fundamental relation which gives being and meaning and value to all +the rest—the relation to God. The fully moral life, therefore, must +include religion. The unity of the two may be thus seen.</p> + +<p>But the present inquiry looks at the matter from the other side, +and seeks a careful and thoroughgoing answer to the question: Why is +the Christian religion, as a personal relation to God, necessarily +ethical?</p> + +<h4>III. THE ANSWER</h4> + +<p>1. <i>Involved in Relation to Christ.</i>—In the first place, +then, it probably may be safely claimed that there is no test of the +moral life of a man so certain as his attitude toward Christ. Setting +aside, now, any special religious claims of Christ altogether, and +recognizing him only as earth's highest character, the supreme artist +in living, who knows the secret of the moral life more surely and more +perfectly than any other, he becomes <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_90" id="page_90">{90}</a></span> even so the surest +touch-stone of character; and the iron filings will not be more +certainly attracted to the magnet than will the men of highest +character be attracted to Christ when he is really seen as he is. +There is no test of character so certain as the test of one's personal +relation to the best persons. The personal attitude toward Christ is +the supreme test. In receiving him, in becoming his disciples in a +completer sense than we own ourselves the disciples of any other, we +make the supreme moral choice of our lives; and, if no more is true +than has been already said, we so accept as a matter of fact the +fullest historical revelation of God at the same time. The ethical and +religious here fall absolutely together. And all the subsequent +choices of our Christian life, if true to Christ, are necessarily +moral.</p> + +<p>2. <i>The Divine Will Felt in the Ethical Command.</i>—In the +second place, the sense of the presence of God, of the divine will +laid upon us, if we have the religious feeling at all, comes to us +nowhere in our common life so certainly and so persistently as in a +sense of obligation which we cannot shake off, a sense of facing a +clear duty. To run away from this, we are made to feel, <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_91" id="page_91">{91}</a></span> is +plainly to run away from God. Is this not a simply true interpretation +of the common consciousness? Here, then, the religious experience is +in the very sphere of the ethical, and identical with it.</p> + +<p>3. <i>Involved in the Nature of God's Gifts.</i>—Again, God's +gifts in religion are of such a kind that they simply cannot be given +to the unwilling soul; just to receive them, therefore, implies +willingness to use them; and faith becomes inevitably both "a gift and +an activity." However one names God's gifts in religion, so long as +the relation is kept a spiritual one at all, receiving the gift +requires a real ethical attitude in the recipient. A real forgiveness, +for example, involves personal reconciliation, restored personal +relations; and reconciliation is mutual. One cannot, then, be said in +any true sense to accept forgiveness from God who is not himself in an +attitude of reconciliation with God, of harmony of will with him. In +the same way, peace with God, the gift of the Spirit, life, God's own +life, cannot be really given to any man without an ethical response on +his part in a definite attitude of will. Anything arbitrary here is, +therefore, necessarily shut out. God's gifts in religion are <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_92" id="page_92">{92}</a></span> of such +a kind that they simply cannot be given to the unwilling soul. They +are not things to be mechanically poured out on men. We have no need, +consequently, to guard our religious statements in this respect. We +cannot even receive from God the spiritual gifts of the religious +relation without the active will. Here, too, religion is certainly +ethical.</p> + +<p>4. <i>Communion with God, through Harmony with His Ethical +Will.</i>—Or, one may say, desire for real communion with God seeks +God himself, not things, or some experience merely. But the very +center of personality is the will; any genuine seeking of God himself, +therefore, to commune with him, requires unity with his ethical will. +The deepest religious motive is at the same time, thus, an impulse to +character.</p> + +<p>5. <i>The Vision of God for the Pure in Heart.</i>—Christ's own +statement—"Blessed are the pure in heart; for they shall see +God"—suggests another aspect of this essential unity of the religious +and the ethical. The connection in the beatitude is no chance one. The +highest and completest revelation of personality, human or divine, can +be made only to the reverent. God reveals himself <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_93" id="page_93">{93}</a></span> to the +reverent soul, and most of all to the pure—to those souls that are +reverent of personality throughout and under the severest pressure. +Therefore, the pure in heart shall see God. "The secret of the Lord is +with them that fear him."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_44" +id="R_44" href="#F_44">[44]</a></span> The vision of God requires the +spirit that is reverent of personality, and this spirit is the abiding +source of the finest ethical living.</p> + +<p>6. <i>Sharing the Life of God.</i>—But perhaps the clearest and +most satisfactory putting of the relation is this. The very meaning of +religion is sharing the life of God. As soon, now, as God is conceived +as essentially holy and loving, a God of character, a living will and +not a substance—and Christianity to be true to itself, must always so +conceive him—so soon religion and morality are indissolubly united. +God's life, according to Christ's teaching, is the life of constant +and perfect self-giving. To share the life of God, therefore, to share +his single purpose, is to come into the life of loving service. The +two fall together from the point of view of the social consciousness. +And we are "saved," we come into the real religious life, only in the +proportion in which we have really learned to <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_94" id="page_94">{94}</a></span> love. "Everyone that +loveth is begotten of God, and knoweth God."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_45" id="R_45" href="#F_45">[45]</a></span> The old separation +of religion and character is impossible from this point of view.</p> + +<p>7. <i>Christ, as Satisfying Our Highest Claims on Life.</i>—But we +may still profitably press the question: Is the Christian +religion—the special faith in the revelation of God in Christ, the +best way to righteousness? does it necessarily, most naturally, most +spontaneously, and most joyfully carry righteousness of life with it? +If this is to be true, Christian faith, in Herrmann's language, "must +give men the power to submit with joy to the claims of duty."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_46" id="R_46" href="#F_46">[46]</a></span> +It may be doubted whether any one has dealt with this question as +satisfactorily as Herrmann himself, and a few sentences may well be +quoted from his discussion. "We know that the ordinary instinctive way +in which men seek the satisfaction of all the needs of life makes it +impossible to submit honestly to the demands of duty, and we see, +also, the falsity of the childish idea of the mystics that this +instinct should be extirpated; it follows, then, that we can only seek +moral deliverance in a true and perfect satisfaction <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_95" id="page_95">{95}</a></span> of our +craving for life.... Now just such a feeling of perfect inner +contentment is possible to the Christian, and he has it just in +proportion as he understands that God turns to him in Christ.... This +is redemption, that Christ creates within us a living joy, whose +brightness beams even from the eye of sorrow, and tells the world of a +power it cannot comprehend. And the power that works redemption is the +fact that in our world there is a Man whose appearance can at any +moment be to us the mighty Word of God, snatching us out of our +troubles and making us to feel that he desires to have us for his own, +and so setting us free from the world and from our own instinctive +nature."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_47" id="R_47" +href="#F_47">[47]</a></span></p> + +<p>Christ, that is, has no desire to withdraw himself from the test of +the largest life. He is able to satisfy the highest demands for life. +He courts the trial. He claims to offer life, the largest life. "I +came," he says, "that they may have life, and may have it +abundantly."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_48" id="R_48" +href="#F_48">[48]</a></span> His way of deliverance is not negative +but positive, not limiting but fulfilling. He is able to give such +largeness of life in himself, such inner satisfaction of the craving +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_96" id="page_96">{96}</a></span> +for life, as makes a lower life lose its power over us, the larger and +higher life driving out the meaner and lower. This is positive +victory, supplanting the lower with the higher; just as in literature, +in music, in friendship, and in love, we expect the best to break down +the taste for the lower.</p> + +<p>8. <i>The Vision of the Riches of the Life of Christ, Ethically +Conditioned.</i>—But the thought of Christ's satisfying our highest +claim on life deserves to be carried further, if it is to be saved +from vagueness and to have its full power with us. The highest value +in the world is a personal life. So Christ has made us feel. It is +finally the only value, for all other so-called values borrow their +value from persons. The highest joy conceivable is entering into the +riches of another's personal life through his willing self-revelation. +Now it is no fine fancy that the supremely rich life of the world's +history is Christ's. God can only be known, if we are not to fall back +into the vagaries of mysticism, in his concrete manifestation; and God +opens out in Christ, the New Testament believes, the inexhaustible +wealth of his own personal life. It is God's highest gift, the gift of +himself. "No one knoweth the Son save the Father; neither <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_97" id="page_97">{97}</a></span> doth +any know the Father, save the Son, and he to whom the Son willeth to +reveal him."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_49" id="R_49" +href="#F_49">[49]</a></span> "This is life eternal, that they should +know thee, the only true God, and him whom thou didst send."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_50" id="R_50" href="#F_50">[50]</a></span> +So it seemed to Paul: "Unto me, who am less than the least of all +saints, was this grace given, to preach unto the Gentiles the +unsearchable riches of Christ."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_51" +id="R_51" href="#F_51">[51]</a></span> Do we not here catch a glimpse +of what the depth of that satisfaction with the inner life of God in +Christ may be?</p> + +<div class="poem"> + <span class="iq">"For He who hath the heart of God sufficed,</span> + <span class="i0">Can satisfy all hearts,—yea, thine and mine."</span> +</div> + +<p class="nodent">Only the riches of a personal life can satisfy our +claim on life, our desire for life; and, ultimately, we can be fully +satisfied only with God's own life in the fullest revelation he can +make of it to us men. Only this can be "the unspeakable gift." The +thirst for God, for the living God, is a simply true expression of the +human heart when it comes to real self-knowledge.</p> + +<p>But the riches of the personal life of Christ are necessarily +hidden to one who does not come into the sharing of Christ's purpose. +The condition of the vision is ethical. The <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_98" id="page_98">{98}</a></span> very satisfaction, +therefore, of our craving for life constantly impels to a more perfect +union with the will of Christ; for such complete entering into the +life of another with joy implies profound agreement. The desire for +life, therefore, for God's own life, for communion with God, itself +impels to character. Faith does here give "the power to submit with +joy to the claims of duty," and religion is ethical in the very heart +of it.</p> + +<p>9. <i>The Moral Law, as a Revelation of the Love of God.</i>—The +same unity of the religious and ethical life is helpfully seen, if we +put the matter in one further and slightly different way. Only the +Christian religion, faith in God as Father revealed in Christ, enables +us to welcome the stern demands of duty and so gives us inner +deliverance, joy, and liberty in the moral life; for now the moral +demand is seen, not as task only, but as opportunity. For Christ, the +law of God is a revelation of the love of God; it is a gracious +indication—a secret whispered to us—of the lines along which we are +to find our largest and richest life; it is not a limitation of life, +but a way to larger life. Not, then, the avoidance, as far as +possible, of the law of God, but the completest fulfilment of it is +the road <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_99" +id="page_99">{99}</a></span> to life—following the hint of the law +into the remotest ramifications, and into the inmost spirit, of the +life. + +The other attitude which assumes that the law is a hindrance to life +is a distinct denial of the love of God. It implies that God lays upon +us demands which are not for our good. It refuses to accept as reality +Christ's manifestation of God as Father. Real belief in the love of +God, on the other hand, must take the fearful out of his commands. To +be "freed from the law," now, has quite a different meaning: not the +taking off from us of the moral demand, but the inner deliverance, +that would not have the command removed, but finds life <i>in</i> it, +and obeys it freely and joyfully. Only a thoroughgoing and fundamental +faith in the Fatherhood of God can bring such inner deliverance, even +as we have seen that only such a faith can really ground the social +consciousness. And such a faith only Christ has proved adequate to +bring.</p> + +<p>With this light, now, we feel, in every demand of duty, the +presence of God, and in this presence of God the pledge of life, not a +limitation of life. The religious life desires God, and it finds God +never so certainly <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_100" +id="page_100">{100}</a></span> as in the purpose fully to face duty. +Every one of the relations of life is, thus, turned to with joy by the +religious man, as sure to be a further channel of the revelation of +God. The thirst for God drives to the faithful fulfilment of the human +relation. Religion becomes joyfully ethical.</p> + +<p>Nor is there any possibility of abandonment to the will of God +<i>in general</i>, as the mystic seems often to feel. God's will means +particulars all along the way of our life; and there is no communion +with God except in this ethical will in particulars. At no point, +therefore, can the religious life withdraw itself from the daily duty +and maintain its own existence. The constant inevitable condition of +the religious communion is the ethical will. Our providential place is +God's place to find us. Where God has put us, just there he will best +find us. This is further seen in the fact that the true Christian +experience is a constant paradox: God ever satisfying, and yet ever +impelling—never allowing us to remain where we are, but holding up to +us the always higher ideal beyond; the law is ever, "Of his fulness we +all received, and grace in place of grace."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_52" id="R_52" href="#F_52">[52]</a></span> The deepening <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_101" id="page_101">{101}</a></span> +communion with God is only through a constantly deepening moral +life.</p> + +<p>Such a thoroughgoing ethicizing of religion as the social +consciousness demands, we need not hesitate, therefore, to believe is +possible. The truer religion is to its own great aspiration after God, +the more certainly is it ethical.</p> + +<p>But the social consciousness, so far as it influences religion, not +only tends to draw away from the falsely mystical, and to emphasize +the personal and the ethical, it also tends to emphasize in religion +the concretely, historically Christian.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_43" id="F_43" href="#R_43" class="label">[43]</a> +Cf. <i>American Journal of Theology</i>, Oct., 1898, p. 824. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_44" id="F_44" href="#R_44" class="label">[44]</a> +Psalm 25:14. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_45" id="F_45" href="#R_45" class="label">[45]</a> +I John 4:7. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_46" id="F_46" href="#R_46" class="label">[46]</a> +<i>The Communion of the Christian with God</i>, p. 230. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_47" id="F_47" href="#R_47" class="label">[47]</a> +<i>Op. cit.</i>, pp. 232-234. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_48" id="F_48" href="#R_48" class="label">[48]</a> +John 10:10. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_49" id="F_49" href="#R_49" class="label">[49]</a> +Matt. 11:27. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_50" id="F_50" href="#R_50" class="label">[50]</a> +John 17:3. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_51" id="F_51" href="#R_51" class="label">[51]</a> +Eph. 3:8. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_52" id="F_52" href="#R_52" class="label">[52]</a> +John 1:16. Cf. Herrmann, <i>Op. cit.</i>, pp. 92, 93. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_102" +id="page_102">{102}</a></span></p> + + +<h3>CHAPTER VIII<br /><br /> +<span class="h90"><i>THE EMPHASIS OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS UPON<br /> +THE HISTORICALLY CHRISTIAN IN RELIGION</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">The</span> fact that the social consciousness +tends to emphasize in religion the concretely historically Christian, +has been so inevitably involved in the preceding discussions, that it +can be treated very briefly.</p> + +<h4>I. THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS NEEDS HISTORICAL JUSTIFICATION</h4> + +<p>The justification of the social consciousness, we have seen,<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_53" id="R_53" href="#F_53">[53]</a></span> +must be preëminently from history. Neither nature nor speculation can +satisfy it. It needs to be able to believe in a living God who is in +living relation to living men. It needs just such a justification as +historical Christianity, and only historical Christianity, can give; +it needs the assurance of an objective divine will in the world, +definitely working in the line of its own ideals. It needs also to be +able to give such <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_103" +id="page_103">{103}</a></span> definite content to the thought of God +as shall be able to satisfy its own strong insistence upon the +rational and the ethical as historical.</p> + + +<h4>II. CHRISTIANITY'S RESPONSE TO THIS NEED</h4> + +<p>If religion is to be a reality to the social consciousness, then, +there must be a real revelation of a real God in the real world, in +actual human history, not an imaginary God, nor a dream God, nor a God +of mystic contemplation. This discernment of God in the real world, in +actual history, is the glory even of the Old Testament; and it came, +as we have seen, along the line of the social consciousness. And it is +such a real revelation of the real God that Christianity finds +preëminently in Christ. It can say to the social consciousness: Make +no effort to believe, but simply put yourself in the presence of a +concrete, definite, actual, historical fact, with its perennial +ethical appeal; put yourself in the presence of Christ—the greatest +and realest of the facts of history,—and let that fact make its own +legitimate impression, work its own natural work; that fact alone, of +all the facts of history, gives you full and ample warrant for your +own being.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_104" +id="page_104">{104}</a></span> If this be true, it can hardly be +doubted that, so far as the social consciousness understands itself +and influences religion at all, it will tend to emphasize, not to +underestimate, the concretely, historically Christian.</p> + +<p>The natural influence of the social consciousness upon religion, +then, may be said to be fourfold: it tends to draw away from the +falsely mystical; it tends to emphasize the personal in religion, and +so to keep the truly mystical; it tends to emphasize the ethical in +religion; and it needs the concretely, historically Christian.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_53" id="F_53" href="#R_53" class="label">[53]</a> +Cf above, pp. 59 ff. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_105" +id="page_105">{105}</a></span></p> + + +<h2>THE INFLUENCE OF THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS<br /> +UPON THEOLOGICAL DOCTRINE</h2> + + +<h3>CHAPTER IX<br /><br /> +<span class="h90"><i>GENERAL RESULTS</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">The</span> question of this third division of +our inquiry is this: To what changed points of view, and to what +restatements of doctrine, and so to what better appreciation of +Christian truth, does the social consciousness of our time lead? The +question is raised here, as in the case of the conception of religion, +not as one of exact historical connection, but rather as a question of +sympathetic points of contact. It means simply: With what changes in +theological statements would the social consciousness naturally find +itself most sympathetic?</p> + +<p>Certain general results are clear from the start, and might be +anticipated from any one of several points of view.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_106" +id="page_106">{106}</a></span></p> + +<h4>I. THE CONCEPTION OF THEOLOGY IN PERSONAL TERMS</h4> + +<p>In the first place, the social consciousness means, we have found, +emphasis on the fully personal—a fresh awakening to the significance +of the person and of personal relations. Its whole activity is in the +sphere of personal relations. Hence, as in the conception of religion, +so here, so far as the social consciousness affects theology at all, +it will tend everywhere to bring the personal into prominence, and it +certainly will be found in harmony ultimately with the attempt to +conceive theology in terms of personal relations. These are for the +social consciousness the realest of realities; and if theology is to +be real to the social consciousness, then it must make much of the +personal. Theology, thus, it is worth while seeing, is not to be +personal <i>and</i> social, but it will be social—it will do justice +to the social consciousness—if it does justice to the fully personal; +for, in the language of another, "man is social, just in so far as he +is personal."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_54" id="R_54" +href="#F_54">[54]</a></span></p> + +<p>The foreign and unreal seeming of many of the old forms of +statement, it may well be <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_107" +id="page_107">{107}</a></span> noted in passing, has its probable +cause just here. They were not shaped in the atmosphere of the social +consciousness. They got at things in a way we should not now think of +using. The method of approach was too merely metaphysical and +individualistic and mystical, and the result seems to us to have but +slight ethical or religious significance. The arguments that now move +us most, in this entire realm of spiritual inquiry, are moral and +social rather than metaphysical and mystical. It is interesting to +see, for example, how such arguments for immortality as that of the +simplicity of the soul's being—and most of those used by Plato—and +how such arguments even for the existence of God as those of Samuel +Clarke from time and space, have become for us merely matters of +curious inquiry. We can hardly imagine men having given them real +weight. A similar change seems to be creeping over the laborious +attempts metaphysically to conceive the divinity of Christ. The +question is shifting its position for both radical and conservative to +a new ground—from the metaphysical and mystical to the moral and +social; though some radicals who regard themselves as in the van of +progress have not yet found it out, and <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_108" id="page_108">{108}</a></span> so find fault with one +for not continually defining himself in terms of the older +metaphysical formulas and shibboleths. The considerations, in all +these questions and in many others, which really weigh most with us +now, are considerations which belong to the sphere of the personal +spiritual life. Ultimately, no doubt, a metaphysics is involved here +too; but it is a metaphysics whose final reality is spirit, not an +unknown substance—Locke's "something, I know not what."</p> + +<p>The unsatisfactoriness of even so honored a symbol as the Apostles' +Creed, as a permanently adequate statement of Christian faith, must +for similar reasons become increasingly clear in the atmosphere of the +social consciousness. One wonders, as he goes carefully over it, that +so many concrete statements could be made concerning the Christian +religion, which yet are so little ethical. The creed seems almost to +exclude the ethical. It has nothing to say, except by rather distant +implication, of the character of God, of the character of Christ, or +of the character of men. The life of Christ between his birth and his +death are untouched. The considerations that really weigh most with +us—as they did with the apostles—in making us Christians, <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_109" id="page_109">{109}</a></span> +certainly do not come here to prominent expression. This whole +difference of atmosphere is the striking fact; and were it not that we +instinctively interpret its phrases in accordance with our modern +consciousness, we should feel the difference much more than we do.</p> + +<p>What the previous discussion has called the truly mystical—the +recognition of the whole man, of the entire personality—is coming in +increasingly to correct both the falsely mystical and the falsely +metaphysical. We are arguing now, in harmony with the social +consciousness, from the standpoint of the broadly rational, not from +that of the narrowly intellectual.</p> + +<h4>II. THE FATHERHOOD OF GOD, AS THE DETERMINING PRINCIPLE<br /> +IN THEOLOGY</h4> + +<p>One might reach essentially the same general results from the +influence of the social consciousness, by seeing that, so far as it +deepens for us the meaning of the personal, it will deepen immediately +our conception of the Fatherhood of God—the central and dominating +doctrine in all theology—and so affect all theology. For, with a +change in the conception <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_110" +id="page_110">{110}</a></span> of God, no doctrine can go wholly +untouched. Every step into a deeper feeling for the personal—and the +growth of the modern social consciousness is undoubtedly a long step +in that direction—deepens necessarily religion and theology. Perhaps +the possible results here can be illustrated in no way better than by +recalling Patterson DuBois' putting of the needed change in the +conception of the proper attitude of a father toward his child. We are +not to say, he writes: "I will conquer that child, no matter what it +may cost him," but we are to say, "I will help that child to conquer +himself, no matter what it may cost me." Now that change in point of +view is a well-nigh perfect illustration of the social consciousness +in a given relation, and it cannot be doubted that it is a true +expression of Christ's thought of the Fatherhood of God; but has it +really dominated through and through our theological statements? +Manifestly, what it means to us that God is Father depends on what we +have come to see in fatherhood. And Principal Fairbairn, in the second +part of his <i>The Place of Christ in Modern Theology</i>, has given +us a good illustration of how much it means for theology to be in +earnest in making the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_111" +id="page_111">{111}</a></span> Fatherhood of God the determining +doctrine in theology.</p> + +<h4>III. CHRIST'S OWN SOCIAL EMPHASES</h4> + +<p>Again, if the general influence of the social consciousness upon +theological doctrine is to be recognized at all, it is evident that a +Christian theology must take full account of Christ's own social +emphases. By loyalty to these, it will expect best to meet the need of +an enlightened social consciousness. It will strive thus—to use +Professor Peabody's instructive summary of "the social principles of +the teaching of Jesus"—to be true to "the view from above, the +approach from within, and the movement toward a spiritual end; wisdom, +personality, idealism; a social horizon, a social power, a social aim. +The supreme truth that this is God's world gave to Jesus his spirit of +social optimism; the assurance that man is God's instrument gave to +him his method of social opportunism; the faith that in God's world +God's people are to establish God's kingdom gave him his social +idealism. He looks upon the struggling, chaotic, sinning world with +the eye of an unclouded religious faith, and discerns in <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_112" id="page_112">{112}</a></span> it +the principle of personality fulfilling the will of God in social +service."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_55" id="R_55" +href="#F_55">[55]</a></span></p> + +<p>And every one of these three great social principles of Jesus has +obvious theological applications, not yet fully made.</p> + +<p>The social consciousness, indeed, well illustrates Fairbairn's +admirable statement of how progress is to be expected in theology. +"The longer the history [of Christ]," he says, "lives in the +[Christian] consciousness and penetrates it, the more does the +consciousness become able to interpret the history in its own terms +and according to its own contents. The old pagan mind into which +Christianity first came could not possibly be the best interpreter of +Christianity, and the more the mind is cleansed of the pagan the more +qualified it becomes to interpret the religion. It is, therefore, +reasonable to expect that the later forms of faith should be the truer +and purer."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_56" id="R_56" +href="#F_56">[56]</a></span></p> + +<p>Now the social consciousness itself is a genuine manifestation of +the spirit of Christ at work in the world, and the mind permeated with +this social consciousness is consequently better able to turn back to +the teaching of Jesus and give it proper interpretation.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_113" id="page_113">{113}</a></span></p> + +<h4>IV. THE REFLECTION IN THEOLOGY OF THE CHANGES<br /> +IN THE CONCEPTION OF RELIGION</h4> + +<p>Once more, theology, as an expression of religion, will at once +reflect any change in the conception of religion. The influence of the +social consciousness upon religion, already traced, will, therefore, +inevitably pass over into theology. This means nothing less than a +changed point of view, in the consideration of each doctrine. For +theology must then recognize clearly that it can build on no falsely +mystical conception of communion with God; but, while keeping the +elements in mysticism which are justified by the social consciousness, +it will require of itself throughout a formulation of doctrine in +terms that shall be thoroughly personal, thoroughly ethical, and +indubitably loyal to the concretely historically Christian. Many +traditional statements quite fail to meet so searching a test; but no +lower standard can give a theology that should fully meet the demands +of the social consciousness.</p> + +<p>The general results of the influence of the social consciousness +upon theological doctrine, then, may be said to include: The emphasis +upon the fully personal, and so <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_114" id="page_114">{114}</a></span> conceiving theology in +terms of personal relation; the deepening of the conception of the +Fatherhood of God, and making this the determining principle in +theology; the application of the social principles of the teaching of +Jesus to theology; the reflection in theology of the natural changes +in the conception of religion wrought by the social consciousness. Now +any one of these general results indicates the certain influence of +the social consciousness upon theology, and any one might be followed +out into helpful suggestions for the restatement of theological +doctrines.</p> + +<p>But we shall probably most clearly and definitely answer the +question of our theme, if we ask specifically concerning the several +elements of the social consciousness: How does a deepening sense of +the like-mindedness of men, of the mutual influence of men, of the +value and sacredness of the person, of personal obligation, and of +love, tend to affect our theological point of view and mode of +statement? And our inquiry will follow these separate questions in +separate chapters, except that for the purposes of theological +inference, the last three may be appropriately grouped together.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_54" id="F_54" href="#R_54" class="label">[54]</a> +Nash, <i>Ethics and Revelation</i>, p. 259. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_55" id="F_55" href="#R_55" class="label">[55]</a> +Peabody, <i>Jesus Christ and the Social Question</i>, p. 104. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_56" id="F_56" href="#R_56" class="label">[56]</a> +Fairbairn, <i>The Place of Christ in Modern Theology</i>, p. 186. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_115" +id="page_115">{115}</a></span></p> + + +<h3>CHAPTER X<br /><br /> <span class="h90"><i>THE INFLUENCE +OF THE DEEPENING SENSE OF THE<br /> LIKE-MINDEDNESS OF MEN UPON +THEOLOGY</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">In</span> definitely considering the influence +of the social consciousness upon theological doctrines, our first +question becomes: How does the deepening sense of the like-mindedness +of men affect theology?</p> + +<p>Obviously, here, the change will be largely one of mood. We shall +look at our themes with a different feeling, and so speak differently, +modifying our methods of putting things in those slight ways that do +not seem specially significant to one who judges in the mass, but mean +very much to one who feels the finer implications of personal life. +These finer changes no one can hope to follow out in detail. Certain +of these finer changes will naturally find incidental expression in +the course of the more formal treatment.</p> + +<p>But our attention must be mainly given to the statement of some of +the most important of the plainer results of the principle in +theology.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_116" +id="page_116">{116}</a></span></p> + +<h4>I. NO PRIME FAVORITES WITH GOD</h4> + +<p>In the first place, this conviction of the like-mindedness of men +means that there can be no prime favorites with God.</p> + +<p>It can hardly help affecting the thought of election. Election +will, indeed, be thought of as qualified by the character of the +chosen; for even Paul's argument in Romans clearly recognizes this, +and is, in fact, itself a distinct argument against a narrow doctrine +of election, as others have recognized.<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_57" id="R_57" href="#F_57">[57]</a></span> But, beyond this, +the conviction of the like-mindedness of men will especially view +election as a choice for service. The divine method of election must +be in harmony with Christ's fundamental principle of his kingdom, and +with the developing social consciousness: "Whosoever shall be first +among you, shall be servant of all."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_58" id="R_58" href="#F_58">[58]</a></span> It is no accident +that this thought of election as choice for preëminent service, which +is indeed soundly biblical, has come into special prominence in these +days of the social consciousness. The same change is passing over our +view of the "elect," as of the "privileged" and "governing" classes. +We <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_117" +id="page_117">{117}</a></span> shall not return to the older feeling +of prime favorites of God, and the problem of evil will find herein a +certain alleviation. We shall feel increasingly that each race and +each individual have their calling and have their compensating +advantages; and that, when it comes down to the final test of +opportunity, the differences in opportunity between individuals are +far less than they seem; for to each one is given the possibility of +the largest service any man can render—the possibility of touching +closely with the very spirit of his life a few other lives. "There are +compensations," as James says, "and no outward changes of condition in +life can keep the nightingale of its eternal meaning from singing in +all sorts of different men's hearts."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_59" id="R_59" href="#F_59">[59]</a></span></p> + +<h4>II. THE GREAT UNIVERSAL QUALITIES AND INTERESTS,<br /> +THE MOST VALUABLE</h4> + +<p>Moreover, since equality of need among men,<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_60" id="R_60" href="#F_60">[60]</a></span> +implies, as we have seen, a common capacity—even if in varying +degrees—of entering into the most fundamental interests of life, this +belief in the essential likeness of <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_118" id="page_118">{118}</a></span> men is likely to carry +with it that most wholesome conviction for theology, that the great +universal qualities and interests are the most valuable. Not that +which distinguishes us from one another, but that which we have in +common is most valuable. As Howells tells the boys in his <i>A Boy's +Town</i>, "the first thing you have to learn here below, is that in +essentials you are just like every one else, and that you are +different from others only in what is not so much worth while."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_61" id="R_61" href="#F_61">[61]</a></span> +This consideration is no small help in facing that most difficult +problem for any ideal view of the world—the problem of evil.</p> + +<p>In God's world, we feel that the most common things ought to be the +best. And this growing conviction of the social consciousness comes in +to confirm our faith. The constant and simple insistence of Christ on +receptivity as a fundamental quality in his kingdom is built, in fact, +on an optimistic faith in the value of the common things.</p> + +<p>It is interesting to notice the varied confirmations of the value +of the common. How often we have to feel that the deepest discussions +come out with only deeper insight <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_119" id="page_119">{119}</a></span> into the great common +truths; and, on the other hand, that in stilted philosophizing, what +seems at first sight a great discovery, proves only a perversely +obscure way of putting a common truth.</p> + +<p>It is the very mission of genius—of the poet in the larger sense, +we are coming to feel, to bring out the value of the common. His +distinctive mark is that he has kept a fresh sense for the great +common experiences of life. So Kipling prays:</p> + +<div class="poem"> + <span class="iq">"It is enough that through Thy grace</span> + <span class="i0">I saw naught common on Thy earth.</span> + <span class="i0">Take not that vision from my ken."</span> +</div> + +<p class="nodent">So, the greatest in art, Hegel contends, has a +universal appeal.</p> + +<p>It is a wholesome and heartening conviction, I say, to bring into +theology, that the really best things are common, accessible to all, +actually shared in, to an extent beyond that which our superficial +vision seems to show. For, after all, this conviction of the social +consciousness is only bringing home to us, in a new and appreciable +way, Christ's own optimism and his own faith in the love of the +Father. It is only another illustration of Fairbairn's principle of +the Christian consciousness becoming more Christian, and <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_120" id="page_120">{120}</a></span> so +better able to understand and interpret Christ.</p> + +<p>And it leads us back by this route of the social consciousness, to +emphasize in life, and in our theological thinking upon the conditions +of entering the kingdom of God, Christ's own insistence upon the two +universally human characteristics found in every child—susceptibility +and trust, which, voluntarily cherished, become teachableness and +belief in love. If God is Father indeed, and we are intended to come +to our best in association with him, these qualities must be the most +fundamental ones. And they imply no lack of virility, either, for the +highest self-assertion, as Professor Everett pointed out in his +criticism of Nietzsche, is in complete self-surrender to such a will +as God's. "When Jesus said, 'He that loseth his life shall save it,' +he said in effect—The self-surrender to which I call you is the +truest self-assertion. We find thus in the teachings of Christianity a +summons to strength far greater than that implied by the +self-assertion which is most characteristic of the teachings of +Nietzsche, because it is the assertion of a larger self."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_62" id="R_62" +href="#F_62">[62]</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_121" +id="page_121">{121}</a></span> Our outlook becomes well-nigh hopeless, +when we make our tests of admission to the kingdom so much more +exclusive than Christ himself made them.</p> + +<h4>III. ESSENTIAL LIKENESS UNDER VERY DIVERSE FORMS</h4> + +<p>It is particularly important for theology that this conviction of +the like-mindedness of men has come from a growing power to discern +essential likeness under very diverse forms; for this consideration +bears not only on the problem of natural evil, but also on the problem +of sin and of the progress of Christianity.</p> + +<p>We have taken some curiously diverse paths to this understanding of +diverse lives. Travels, history, biography, autobiographical +fragments, anthropology, sociology, psychology, and—to no small +degree—fiction, with its stories of out-of-the-way places and +out-of-the-way peoples and of unfamiliar classes,—all have been +thoroughfares for the social consciousness here.</p> + +<p>We are slowly learning to see the likeness under the differences, +and so to transcend the differences even between occidental and <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_122" id="page_122">{122}</a></span> +oriental. All this means much, not only for our practical missionary +putting of the truth, but also for our final theological statements. +They will inevitably grow simpler, larger, more universally human, and +at the same time more deep and solid.</p> + +<p>We are slowly learning, too, to discern a deep inner content of +life under conditions that have no appeal for us, and to see like +ideals and aspirations under very diverse forms of expression. Take, +for example, these three or four sentences—a small part of that +quoted by Professor James in his essay, <i>On a Certain Blindness in +Human Beings</i>,—from Stevenson's <i>Lantern-Bearers</i>: "It is +said that a poet has died young in the breast of the most stolid. It +may be contended rather that a (somewhat minor) bard in almost every +case survives, and is the spice of life to his possessor. Justice is +not done to the versatility and the unplumbed childishness of man's +imagination. His life from without may seem but a rude mound of mud; +there will be some golden chamber at the heart of it in which he +dwells delighted."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_63" id="R_63" +href="#F_63">[63]</a></span> And, later, on the side of ideals, +Stevenson is quoted once again: "If I could show you <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_123" id="page_123">{123}</a></span> +these men and women all the world over, in every stage of history, +under every abuse of error, under every circumstance of failure, +without hope, without help, without thanks, still obscurely fighting +the lost fight of virtue, still clinging to some rag of honor, the +poor jewel of their souls!"<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_64" +id="R_64" href="#F_64">[64]</a></span> And now, having quoted Howells +and Stevenson as theological authorities, I shall be pardoned if, for +a moment, I erect Kenneth Grahame's <i>Golden Age</i> into a +"theological institute": "See," said my friend, bearing somewhat on my +shoulder, "how this strange thing, this love of ours, lives and shines +out in the unlikeliest of places! You have been in the fields in early +morning? Barren acres, all! But only stoop—catch the light +thwartwise—and all is a silver network of gossamer! So the fairy +filaments of this strange thing underrun and link together the whole +world. Yet it is not the old imperious god of the fatal bow—<span +title="herôs hanikate machan" >ἐρως +ἀνικατε +μάχαν</span>—not that—nor even the placid +respectable <span title="storgê" +>στοργή</span>—but something still +unnamed, perhaps more mysterious, more divine! Only one must stoop to +see it, old fellow, one must stoop!"<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_65" id="R_65" href="#F_65">[65]</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_124" id="page_124">{124}</a></span> +It means very much for the sanity of our outlook on life, and for any +possible theodicy, that we can believe the heart of such a view as +this for which Stevenson and Grahame are here contending. And what is +all this attempt to get away from this "certain blindness in human +beings," of which Professor James speaks, but a growing into one of +the fixed habits of Jesus, what Phillips Brooks calls "his discovery +of interest in people whom the world generally would have found most +uninteresting?" "And this same habit," he adds, "passing over into his +disciples, made the wide and democratic character of the new +faith."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_66" id="R_66" +href="#F_66">[66]</a></span></p> + +<h4>IV. AS APPLIED TO THE QUESTION OF IMMORTALITY</h4> + +<p>It may probably be safely said that this steadily growing +conviction of the social consciousness, of the essential likeness of +all men, which is daily confirmed afresh, and the more confirmed the +more careful the study, is not likely to take kindly to the +idea—which comes into a part of Dr. McConnell's argument concerning +immortality, in his interesting book, <i>The Evolution of +Immortality</i>—that <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_125" +id="page_125">{125}</a></span> living creatures classed as men on +physical grounds are not, therefore, to be so classed on psychical +grounds.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_67" id="R_67" +href="#F_67">[67]</a></span> The considerations and illustrations +brought forward by Dr. McConnell, in connection with this proposition, +I cannot think would seem at all conclusive to either the trained +psychologist or sociologist. It is exactly the like-mindedness of men +which the social consciousness affirms, and it has not come hastily to +its conclusion. It will not quickly surrender that conclusion. There +<i>is</i> an "evolution of immortality," and it has been age-long, but +it is pre-human. The belief in immortality so far as it does not rest +purely on the question of the moral quality of a given human life +(where the hypothesis of "immortability" may properly enough come in) +is grounded upon characteristics—like that of the possibility of +absolutely indefinite progress<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_68" +id="R_68" href="#F_68">[68]</a></span>—which in sober scientific +inquiry cannot safely be denied to any man, and must be denied to all +creatures below man. In any case, the new theory of "immortability," +so far as it is based upon the proposition <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_126" id="page_126">{126}</a></span> here considered, has +its battle to fight out with this established conviction of the social +consciousness of the essential like-mindedness of all men.</p> + +<p>There are various considerations, not all of them wholly +creditable, which will lead many to turn a willing ear to this new +prophesying; but, though it makes much of evolution, it seems to me to +have the whole trend of the social evolution against it, and to give +the lie to that patient sympathetic insight into the lives of other +classes and peoples, which is one of the finest products of the +ethical evolution of the race. If one is tempted to believe that a +good large share of the human race are really brutes in human +semblance,—and our selfishness and pride and impatience and unloving +lack of insight and desire to dominate may naturally tempt in this +direction,—let him read that chapter of Professor James to which +reference has already been made, <i>On a Certain Blindness in Human +Beings</i>, and its pendant, <i>What Makes a Life Significant</i>. It +may help his theology. Let him recall the words of Phillips Brooks +concerning this "strange hopelessness about the world, joined to a +strong hope for themselves, which we see in many good religious <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_127" id="page_127">{127}</a></span> +people." "In their hearts they recognize indubitably that God is +saving them, while the aspect of the world around them seems to show +them that the world is going to perdition. This is a common enough +condition of mind; but I think it may be surely said that it is not a +good, nor can it be a permanent, condition. God has mercifully made us +so that no man can constantly and purely believe in any great +privilege for himself unless he believes in at least the possibility +of the same privilege for other men."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_69" id="R_69" href="#F_69">[69]</a></span></p> + +<h4>V. CONSEQUENT LARGER SYMPATHY WITH MEN, FAITH IN MEN,<br /> +AND HOPE FOR MEN</h4> + +<p>This whole conviction of the social consciousness, of the +like-mindedness of men, leads naturally to increased <i>sympathy with +men</i>, and this in turn to still better discernment of moral and +spiritual realities. And this is of prime importance for the +theologian; for sympathetic insight, it must never be forgotten, is +the true route to spiritual verities. So far as our insight into +actual human life becomes truer, so far our theology becomes clearer +and more reasonable.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_128" +id="page_128">{128}</a></span> This conviction leads also to increased +<i>belief in men</i>, and consequently to increased belief in the +effectiveness of the higher appeals. The temptation to disbelief in +man was one of the underlying temptations of Christ as he looked +forward to his work; but he turned resolutely from it, and refused to +build his kingdom on any lower appeal that implied a lack of faith in +men. Nothing seems to me more wonderful in Christ than his marvelous +faith in man; for, though he has the deepest sense of the sin of men, +there is not the slightest trace of cynicism in his thought or +life.</p> + +<p>This recognition of likeness under diversity, too, leads to +increased <i>hope for men</i>, here and hereafter. In James' words: +"It absolutely forbids us to be forward in pronouncing on the +meaninglessness of forms of existence other than our own.... Neither +the whole of truth nor the whole of good is revealed to any single +observer.... No one has insight into all the ideals. No one should +presume to judge them off-hand."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_70" +id="R_70" href="#F_70">[70]</a></span></p> + +<p>This thought helps us to greater hope for men, because, indeed, it +helps us to the discernment of genuine ideals under very different +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_129" +id="page_129">{129}</a></span> forms of life, of the universal sense +of duty and some loyalty to it, though there is great diversity of +judgment as to what is duty.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_71" +id="R_71" href="#F_71">[71]</a></span> But, it is here to be noted, +also, that the thought of the like-mindedness of men brings greater +hope, because it helps to the discernment of likeness, even under +difference in important terms used. We are coming to see that there is +sometimes, at least, a really strong religious faith where men do not +acknowledge the term. Thus, Bradley says: "All of us, I presume, more +or less, are led beyond the region of ordinary facts. Some in one way, +and some in others, we seem to touch and have communion with what is +beyond the visible world. In various manners we find something higher, +which supports and humbles, both chastens and transports us. And," as +a philosopher he adds, "with certain persons, the intellectual effort +to understand the universe is a principal way of thus experiencing the +Deity."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_72" id="R_72" +href="#F_72">[72]</a></span></p> + +<p>Even where the term Deity would be entirely abjured, we have seen +with Paulsen,<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_73" id="R_73" +href="#F_73">[73]</a></span> <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_130" +id="page_130">{130}</a></span> that a real faith essentially religious +in character may be clearly manifest. We are even coming to see that +men may seem to themselves to be contending upon opposite sides of so +fundamental a question as that of the personality of God, and yet be +near together as to their own ultimate faith and attitude, and +possibly even as to their real philosophical views of God; but the +same term has come to have such different connotations for the men, +from their different education and experience, that they simply cannot +use it with the same meaning.</p> + +<p>I have not the slightest desire to reduce the concrete, ethical, +definitely personal religion of Jesus to the ambiguities of +philosophical dreamers; the world is going to become more and more +consciously and avowedly Christian. But I do not, on the other hand, +as a Christian theologian, wish to shut my eyes to great essential +likenesses in fundamental faiths and ideals and aspirations, because +they are clothed in different garb. The life and teaching of Jesus +have worked and are working in the consciousness of men far beyond the +limits our feeble faith is inclined to prescribe. There is doubtless +much "unconscious Christianity," much "unconscious <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_131" id="page_131">{131}</a></span> +following of Christ."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_74" id="R_74" +href="#F_74">[74]</a></span> And we are only following Christ's own +counsel, when we refuse to forbid the man who is working a good work +in his name, though he follows not with us.<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_75" id="R_75" href="#F_75">[75]</a></span> Certainly, if we +accept the witness of a man's life against the witness of his lips +when the witness of his lips is right, we ought to accept the witness +of his life against the witness of his lips when the witness of his +lips is wrong.</p> + +<p>With reference to all the preceding inferences from the deepening +sense of the like-mindedness of men, it is particularly worthy of +note, that this conviction of the essential likeness of men has come +into existence side by side with the growing conviction of the moral +unripeness of many men, and in spite of that conviction. The careful +study of different social classes is forcing upon both the scientific +sociologist and the practical social worker, the sense of the ethical +immaturity of men. But deeper than this recognition of moral +unripeness, deeper than the vision of the sad defectiveness of moral +and spiritual ideals and standards, <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_132" id="page_132">{132}</a></span> deeper than the clear +sense of the immense differences among men as to <i>what</i> is duty, +deeper than the differences in even the most important terms used, +lies this great conviction of likeness—that all men are moral and +spiritual beings, made for relation to one another and to God; that +they have ideals that have a wide outlook implicit in them, and have +some loyalty to these ideals; that they do have a sense of obligation; +that the moral and spiritual life is a reality, a great universal +human fact.</p> + +<h4>VI. JUDGMENT ACCORDING TO LIGHT, AND THE MORAL REALITY<br /> +OF THE FUTURE LIFE</h4> + +<p>It is no accident, now, that accompanying this double social +conviction, there has come into theology a new insistence upon the +principle of judgment of a man according to his light, and +consequently also, what Professor Clarke calls "a tendency toward the +recognition of greater reality and freedom in the other life, and thus +toward the possibility of moral change."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_76" id="R_76" href="#F_76">[76]</a></span> Our conception of +the future life was certain to be modified by the social +consciousness; and it may be <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_133" +id="page_133">{133}</a></span> doubted if any influence of the social +consciousness upon theology can be more clearly traced historically +than this. The motives that have been working in our minds here +include, on the one hand, a wholesome sense of the imperfection of +even the best human lives; a glad discernment, on the other hand, of +the presence of genuine ideals in lives where we had thought there +were none; the certainty that, as Dr. Clarke says, "for at least +one-third of mankind the entire life of conscious and developed +personality is lived in the other world;"<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_77" id="R_77" href="#F_77">[77]</a></span> an experienced +unwillingness to say, where we cannot see, the precise point at which +the very diverse lives of men under very diverse conditions come to +full moral maturity; and the conviction that a life that is to be +moral at all must be moral everywhere and through all time, and that +where even we can see a little, God can see much more. All these +motives, now, make us refuse, with Christ, to answer the question, +"Are there few that be saved?" And both with increasing hope, and with +that increasing sense of the seriousness and significance of life +which so characterizes the social consciousness, to urge: "Strive to +enter in." <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_134" +id="page_134">{134}</a></span> The growing sense of the likeness of +men does affect our thought of the future life. The best men, under +the clearest light, have only begun; for the best, there is still much +need of growth. Who has not begun at all? For whom is there no +growth?</p> + +<p>Let us make no mistake here. It is no light-hearted indifference to +character, to which the genuine social consciousness leads. No age, +indeed, ever saw so clearly as ours that the most essential conditions +of happiness are in character, or was more certain that sin carries +with it its own inevitable consequences. It is not a less, but a more, +profound sense of the seriousness of the problem of moral character, +that makes us hesitate to dogmatize concerning the future life.</p> + +<p>To bring together, now, the conclusions of the chapter: The first +element in the social consciousness—the deepening sense of the +likeness of men—seems likely to affect theology, especially by +modifying the thought of election through emphasis upon choice for +service, and through the clear recognition that there are no prime +favorites with God; by strengthening the conviction that the great +common qualities and interests are the most valuable, <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_135" id="page_135">{135}</a></span> and +that genuine and largely common ideals may be found under very diverse +forms and conditions; and thus, on the one hand, by opposing the +denial of the psychical likeness of men, as applied to the problem of +immortality, and, on the other hand, by bringing us to larger sympathy +with men, to larger faith in men, and to larger hope for men; and, +finally, by laying new emphasis upon judgment according to light, and +upon the moral reality and freedom of the future life.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_57" id="F_57" href="#R_57" class="label">[57]</a> +Cf. e. g., Clarke, <i>Outline of Christian Theology</i>, p. 145. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_58" id="F_58" href="#R_58" class="label">[58]</a> +Mark 10:44. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_59" id="F_59" href="#R_59" class="label">[59]</a> +James, <i>Talks on Psychology and Life's Ideals</i>, p. 301. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_60" id="F_60" href="#R_60" class="label">[60]</a> +Cf. Giddings, <i>Elements of Sociology</i>, p. 324. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_61" id="F_61" href="#R_61" class="label">[61]</a> +Howells, <i>A Boy's Town</i>, p. 205. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_62" id="F_62" href="#R_62" class="label">[62]</a> +<i>The New World</i>, Dec., 1898, pp. 702, 703. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_63" id="F_63" href="#R_63" class="label">[63]</a> +James, <i>Talks on Psychology and Life's Ideals</i>, p. 237. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_64" id="F_64" href="#R_64" class="label">[64]</a> +<i>Op. cit.</i>, p. 282. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_65" id="F_65" href="#R_65" class="label">[65]</a> +P. 112. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_66" id="F_66" href="#R_66" class="label">[66]</a> +Brooks, <i>The Influence of Jesus</i>, p. 253. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_67" id="F_67" href="#R_67" class="label">[67]</a> +McConnell, <i>The Evolution of Immortality</i>, pp. 75 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_68" id="F_68" href="#R_68" class="label">[68]</a> +Cf. James, <i>Psychology</i>, Vol. II, pp. 348 ff., p. 367; Lotze, +<i>The Microcosmus</i>, Book V, especially Vol. I, pp. 713, 714. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_69" id="F_69" href="#R_69" class="label">[69]</a> +<i>The Candle of the Lord, and Other Sermons</i>, p. 154. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_70" id="F_70" href="#R_70" class="label">[70]</a> +<i>Talks on Psychology and Life's Ideals</i>, pp. 263, 265. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_71" id="F_71" href="#R_71" class="label">[71]</a> +Cf. above, p. 121 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_72" id="F_72" href="#R_72" class="label">[72]</a> +Bradley, <i>Appearance and Reality</i>, pp. 5, 6. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_73" id="F_73" href="#R_73" class="label">[73]</a> +Cf. above, pp. 46, 47. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_74" id="F_74" href="#R_74" class="label">[74]</a> +Cf. Fremantle, <i>The World as the Subject of Redemption</i>, pp. +250 ff, 320 ff; Lyman Abbott, <i>The Outlook</i>, Dec. 24, 1898. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_75" id="F_75" href="#R_75" class="label">[75]</a> +Mark 9:38, 39; Cf. Matt. 10:40-42. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_76" id="F_76" href="#R_76" class="label">[76]</a> +<i>An Outline of Christian Theology</i>, p. 475. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_77" id="F_77" href="#R_77" class="label">[77]</a> +<i>Op. cit.</i>, p. 469. +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_136" +id="page_136">{136}</a></span></p> + + + +<h3>CHAPTER XI<br /><br /> <span class="h90"><i>THE INFLUENCE +OF THE DEEPENING SENSE OF THE MUTUAL INFLUENCE OF MEN UPON +THEOLOGY</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">From</span> this first element of the social +consciousness, we turn now to the second, and ask, How does the +deepening sense of the mutual influence of men affect theology?</p> + +<h4>I. THE REAL UNITY OF THE RACE</h4> + +<p>1. First, then, taken with the sense of the likeness of men, it can +hardly be doubted that sociology's strong feeling of the mutual +influence of men deepens for theology the thought of the real, not the +mechanical, unity of the race. The theologian believes, more than he +did, in a race whose unity is preëminently moral, rather than physical +or mystical. The truly scientific position for the theologian seems to +be, to make no mysterious assumptions, where well-known causes are +sufficient to account for the facts; and those causes which the social +consciousness clearly sees to <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_137" +id="page_137">{137}</a></span> be at work seem, in all probability, +adequate to account for the facts in discussion so far as those facts +are finite at all.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_78" id="R_78" +href="#F_78">[78]</a></span> The theologian knows, then, a true moral +universe, with a unity which is that of the close personal, mutual +relations of like-minded spiritual beings.</p> + +<p>The natural goal of such a race, the only one in which they can +truly find themselves, is the kingdom of God. This conception of +Christ is first thoroughly at home with us, when we see that the true +unity of the race is that of personal moral relation. So far as men +turn from that goal, this same racial unity of the inevitable and most +intimate personal relations converts them into something approaching +Ritschl's conception of an opposing "kingdom of sin."</p> + +<p>Are we prepared to be thoroughly loyal to just this conception of +the unity of the race throughout our theological thinking; and so to +give up cherished ideas of "common," "transmitted," "inherited," or +"racial" sin or righteousness, of "mystical solidarity," and racial +ideal representation, etc.? It probably may be said with truth that +few, if any, theological systems have been thus <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_138" id="page_138">{138}</a></span> +loyal. Indeed, under what seems a mistaken application of the social +consciousness, and particularly under the misleading influence of the +analogy of the organism, men have believed themselves attaining a +deeper theological view, when they have, in fact, turned away from the +sober teaching of the social consciousness.</p> + +<p>It may not be in vain for our theology to hear and receive with +patience a sociologist's definition of the "social mind." Upon this +point Professor Giddings says explicitly: "There is no reason to +suppose that society is a great being which is conscious of itself +through some mysterious process of thinking, separate and distinct +from the thinking that goes on in the brains of individual men. At any +rate, there is no possible way yet known to man of proving that there +is any such supreme social consciousness." Nevertheless, he adds: "To +the group of facts that may be described as the simultaneous +like-mental-activity of two or more individuals in communication with +one another, or as a concert of the emotions, thought, and will of two +or more communicating individuals, we give the name, the social mind. +This name, accordingly, should be regarded as <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_139" id="page_139">{139}</a></span> meaning just this group +of facts and nothing more. It does not mean that there is any other +consciousness than that of individual minds. It does mean that +individual minds act simultaneously in like ways and continually +influence one another; and that certain mental products result from +such combined mental action which could not result from the thinking +of an individual who had no communication with fellow-beings."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_79" id="R_79" +href="#F_79">[79]</a></span></p> + +<p>Just so far, it may well be supposed, and no farther may we go, in +theology, in moral and spiritual inferences from the unity of the +race. We are members one of another for good and for ill, one in the +unity of the inevitable, mutual influence of like-minded persons.</p> + +<h4>II. DEEPENING THE SENSE OF SIN</h4> + +<p>And this conviction, in the second place, not only deepens our +sense of the real unity of the race, it deepens also the sense of sin. +And we can hardly separate here the influence of the third element of +the social consciousness—the sense of the value and <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_140" id="page_140">{140}</a></span> +sacredness of the person. As against a rather wide-spread and often +expressed contrary feeling, this deepening sense of sin may yet, it is +believed, be truthfully maintained, <i>so far as the social +consciousness is really making itself felt</i>. There are some +disintegrating tendencies here, no doubt, like the tendency under some +applications of evolution and evolutionary philosophy to turn all sin +into a necessary stage in the evolution. But had not Drummond reason +to say: "There is one theological word which has found its way lately +into nearly all the newer and finer literature of our country. It is +not only <i>one</i> of the words of the literary world at present, it +is perhaps <i>the</i> word. Its reality, its certain influence, its +universality, have at last been recognized, and in spite of its +theological name have forced it into a place which nothing but its +felt relation to the wider theology of human life could ever have +earned for a religious word. That word, it need scarcely be said, is +sin."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_80" id="R_80" +href="#F_80">[80]</a></span></p> + +<p>Contrast this modern sense of sin with the almost total lack of it +among even so gifted a people of the ancient world as the Greeks, and +feel the significance of the phenomenon. <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_141" id="page_141">{141}</a></span> But it is particularly +to be noted that this sense of sin in literature is largely due to a +keener social conscience. In fact, if the social consciousness is not +a thoroughly fraudulent phenomenon, it could hardly be otherwise; for +the social consciousness, in its very essence, is a sense of what is +due a person; and sin is always ultimately against a person, failure +to be what one ought to be in some personal relation, including +finally all the relations of the kingdom of God. We simply cannot +deepen the sense of the meaning and value of personal relations, and +not deepen, at the same time, the sense of sin. The meaning of the +Golden Rule, and so the sense of sin under it, deepens inevitably with +every step into the meaning of the person. If the one great +commandment is love, then the sin of which men need most of all to be +convicted is lack of love.</p> + +<p>The self-tormenting and fanciful sins of some of our devotional +books very likely are less felt. But the very existence of the social +consciousness seems to be proof that there never was so much good, +honest, wholesome sense of real sin as to-day—such sin as Christ +himself recognizes in his own judgment test.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_142" +id="page_142">{142}</a></span> It may be that, in temporary absorption +in the human relations, the relation of all this to the All-Father may +seem forgotten; even so, we may well remember Christ's "Ye did it unto +me." But, in fact, we must go much farther and say, The social +consciousness can only be true to itself finally, as it goes on to see +its acts in the light, most of all, of that single, personal relation +which underlies all others. We have already seen that the social +consciousness requires for its own justification its grounding in the +manifest trend of the living will of God. With this felt +identification of the will of God with love for men, men can still +less shake off easily the conviction of sin.</p> + +<p>Probably, most religious men argue a diminishing sense of sin, +because they feel that less is made of those consequences of sin which +have been usually connected with the future life. There may be real +danger here from shallow thinking; but here, too, the social +consciousness has only to be true to itself to be saved from any +shallow estimate of the consequences of sin here or hereafter. As the +sin itself is always, finally, in personal relations, so the most +terrible results of sin, in this life and in all lives, are <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_143" id="page_143">{143}</a></span> in +personal relations. What it costs the man himself in cutting him off +from the relations in which all largeness of life consists, what it +costs those who love him, what it costs God,—this alone is the true +measure of sin. So judged, sin itself is feared as never before. +Surely, Principal Fairbairn is right in saying: "And so even within +Christendom, sin is never so little feared as when hell most dominates +the imagination; it needs to be looked at as it affects God, to be +understood and feared."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_81" id="R_81" +href="#F_81">[81]</a></span> But it is the inevitable result of the +social consciousness to bring us to the deepest conviction of all +these personal relations, and so to the deepest conviction of sin.</p> + +<p>Another consideration deserves attention. We have a growing +conviction that our social ideal is personally realized only in +Christ, and we have given unequaled attention to that life and have +such knowledge of it, in its detailed applications, as no preceding +generation has ever had. This simply means that we have both such a +sense of our moral calling, and are face to face with such a living +standard, as must steadily deepen in us a genuine sense of real sin, +in our falling so far short of the spirit of Christ.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_144" +id="page_144">{144}</a></span> Theology needs, further, to make +unmistakably clear, and to use the fact, that <i>this mutual influence +of men holds for good</i> as well as for evil; that few greater lies +have ever been told, than the insinuation that only evil is +contagious, the good not. And this conviction of the contagion of the +good, of mutual influence for good, concerns theology particularly in +three ways, all of which may be regarded simply as illustrations or +aspects of the one kingdom of God. We are members one of another (1) +in attainment of character, (2) in personal relation to God, and (3) +in confession of faith. And each of these forms of mutual influence +will need careful attention.</p> + +<p>In considering separately here attainment of character and relation +to God, it is not meant for a moment to admit that separation of +ethics and religion which has been already denied, but only to single +out for distinct treatment the one most important and fundamental +relation of life—relation to God. We are certainly never to forget +that the indispensable condition of right relations to God, is that a +man should have been won into willingness to share God's own righteous +purpose concerning men.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_145" +id="page_145">{145}</a></span></p> + +<h4>III. MUTUAL INFLUENCE FOR GOOD IN THE ATTAINMENT OF CHARACTER</h4> + +<p>We know no deeper law in the building of character, than that +righteous character comes through that association with the best in +which there is mutual self-giving. The problem of character implies +not only a bare recognition of a man's moral freedom, but a sacred +respect at every point for his personality. If a man is ever to have +character at all, it must be absolutely his own; he must be won freely +into it. In this free winning to character, no association counts for +its most that is not mutual. I become in character most certainly and +rapidly like that man with whom I constantly am, to whose influence I +most fully surrender, and who gives himself most completely to me.</p> + +<p>We may analyze the phenomenon psychologically, as, indeed, we have +already done in showing that a true personal relation to Christ +necessarily carries with it a true ethical life. And that which held +true for religion cannot be false for theology, we may be sure. But, +in any case, we always come back finally to the fact, that character +is truly and inevitably contagious in an association in which there is +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_146" +id="page_146">{146}</a></span> mutual surrender. Character is caught, +not taught. The inner strength of another life to which we surrender +is, as Phillips Brooks somewhere says, "directly transmissible." I +suspect that the ultimate psychological principle at work here is that +of the impulsiveness of consciousness. But, whether that be true or +not, the witness to this contagion is wide-spread among students of +men. "The greatest gift the hero leaves his race," one of our great +novelists says, "is to have been a hero." In almost identical +language, a great ethical and philosophical writer adds: "The noblest +workers of our world bequeath us nothing so great as the image of +themselves. Their task, be it ever so glorious, is historical and +transient, the majesty of their spirit is essential and eternal."</p> + +<p>But one might still think, here, only of an example. The other +life, however, must be more to me than mere example. For the highest +attainment in character I need the association of some highest one, +who will give himself to me unreservedly. Redemption to real +righteousness of life cannot be without cost to the redeemer. And it +is a psychologist, facing the ultimate problem of will-strengthening, +who urges in words that might seem <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_147" id="page_147">{147}</a></span> almost to look to +Christ: "The prophet has drunk more deeply than any one of the cup of +bitterness; but his countenance is so unshaken, and he speaks such +mighty words of cheer, that his will becomes our will, and our life is +kindled at his own."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_82" id="R_82" +href="#F_82">[82]</a></span> It <i>is</i> the one great certain road +to character—as it is to appreciation of every value—to stay in the +presence of the best, in self-surrender to it. No wonder Christ said, +"I am the Way."</p> + +<p>1. <i>The Application to the Problem of Redemption.</i>—It is +hardly possible to ignore this one great known law of +character-making, which the social consciousness so presses upon us, +in any thinking that is for a moment worth while concerning our +redemption by Christ. And whatever our point of view, this +consideration ought to have weight with us. Nay, must we not make it +necessarily the very center of all our thought here? For all the +realities in this problem of redeeming a man from sin to righteousness +are intensely personal, ethical, spiritual. Now, are we to reach a +deeper view of redemption, by turning away from the deepest ethical +fact to the unethical? Do we so ground our view the more securely? Is +there something holier <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_148" +id="page_148">{148}</a></span> than the holy ethical will seen +realized in Christ's life and death? For, if it is the will in his +death by which we are sanctified,<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_83" +id="R_83" href="#F_83">[83]</a></span> there can be no sharp +separation of the life and death. Must we not rather expect that the +clearest light, on the holiest in God and our personal relation to +him, will be thrown by the holiest we know in life, in our human +personal relations?</p> + +<p>Is not the precise method of redemption, then, to no small degree, +cleared for us right here, in this conviction of the social +consciousness of the contagion of the good in a self-surrendering +association—the only solidarity of which we can be certain? Christ +saves us, in the only certain way we know that any man is ever saved +to better living, through direct contagion of character, through his +immediate influence upon us. The power of the influence of a redeeming +person must depend upon two facts: the richness of the self that is +given, and the depth of the giving. The supremely redeeming power must +be the giving of the richest self, unto the uttermost. God has not yet +done his best for men, until he gives himself in the fullest +manifestation which can be made <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_149" id="page_149">{149}</a></span> through man to men, and +gives to the uttermost, with no drawing back from any cost. Is it not +because, after all, back of all theories and even in spite of +theories, men have seen in the life and death of Christ just this +eternal giving of God himself, that they have been caught up into some +sharing of the same spirit, and so felt working directly and +immediately upon them the supremest redeeming power the world knows? +The cross of Christ has been God's not only <i>saying</i>, "I will +help that child to conquer himself, whatever it costs me," but God +doing it, and perpetually doing it. Not less than that must be the +cost of a man's redemption.</p> + +<p>Character is directly transmissible in an association in which +there is mutual self-giving. It is most easily so transmissible, only +at its highest, in its most perfect manifestation, in its completest +self-giving at any cost.</p> + +<p>The self-giving on the part of one trying to win another into +character must precede the self-giving of the sinner; for the sinner's +own willingness to yield himself to the influence of the character of +the other must first of all be won. This initial winning of the +coöperative will of the other is the heart of the whole battle. And +here the power <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_150" +id="page_150">{150}</a></span> relied on is not only the unconscious +contagion and imitation of character that enlists a man's interest +almost by surprise, but also the mightiest influence men know in +breaking down the resisting will and winning men consciously and with +final abandon—the influence of a patient, long-suffering, persistent, +self-sacrificing love that cannot give the sinning one up.</p> + +<p>Most certainly, then, redemption cannot be without cost to the +redeemer of men—not only that cost to the hero of the superior +showing of superior character in a superior task, but that other cost, +indissolubly linked indeed with this, of reverently, patiently, to the +bitter end, helping another to conquer himself—the inevitable +suffering of all redemptive endeavor for those whom one loves. This +involves (1) suffering in contact with sin, (2) suffering in the +rejection by those sinning, and most of all, (3) suffering in the sin +itself of those one loves because one loves them—suffering which is +the more intense, the more one loves.</p> + +<p>2. <i>The Consequent Ethical and Spiritual Meaning of Substitution +and Propitiation.</i>—Can we go yet a step farther here? It may be +fairly taken for granted that where the <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_151" id="page_151">{151}</a></span> church has strongly and +persistently stood for certain modes of putting a doctrine—though the +precise putting may be unfortunate—that in all probability there is +there some real and important truth after which the consciousness of +the church is dimly feeling. Starting, now, from this same great law +of the contagion of character and the inevitable influence of an +association in which there is mutual self-giving, is it not possible +to show that there is a strict ethical and spiritual sense that we can +understand, in which Christ's suffering may be truly called vicarious, +and himself a substitute for us, and a propitiation?</p> + +<p>It is, of course, not for a moment forgotten that, in Dr. Clarke's +language, "a God who will himself provide a propitiation has no need +of one in the sense which the word has ordinarily borne. Some richer +and nobler meaning must be present if the word is appropriate to the +case."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_84" id="R_84" +href="#F_84">[84]</a></span> But it is not likely that a purely +ethical and spiritual view of the atonement, which sees the problem as +a strictly personal one—and this seems to the writer the only true +position—can ever succeed in the hearts of the great body of the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_152" +id="page_152">{152}</a></span> membership of the churches, if it +cannot show, at the same time, that it is able in some real way to +take up into itself these thoughts of substitution and propitiation. +The writer finds much of the old language about the atonement as +offensive to his moral sense as any man well can. But that there is an +absolutely universal human need for something like that to which the +old language of substitution and propitiation looked, he cannot doubt. +It seems to show itself in this, that no man with real moral sense, +probably, cares to put himself at the end of his life, say, in the +attitude of the Pharisee rather than in that of the Publican. If one +sets aside all spectacular elements in the judgment, and even denies +altogether any great single final assize for all men, still he cannot +avoid the thought of some judgment upon his life. As Dr. Clarke says +again: "We are not our own masters in going out of this world; we go +we know not whither. Yet our going is not without its just and holy +method. Our place and lot in the life that is beyond must be +determined righteously, in accordance with the life that we have lived +thus far, that the next stage in our existence may be what it ought to +be."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_85" id="R_85" +href="#F_85">[85]</a></span></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_153" +id="page_153">{153}</a></span> However, now, that judgment of God may +be expressed, no man can hope to face the test proposed by Christ in +the twenty-fifth of Matthew, still less the test implied in Christ's +own life, and feel that he has <i>already</i> attained. He knows +himself to be at best only a faulty growing child, with some real +spirit of obedience in his heart. And it is particularly to be noted, +that exactly that man must stand most definitely for the reality of +some genuinely ethical judgment, who has most insisted upon the +necessarily ethical character of the religious life. Moreover, the +normal experience of the deepening Christian life is an increasing +sense of sin. Upon this point, too, the social consciousness is +witness.</p> + +<p>What, now, makes it possible for a man to expect, in any sense, a +favorable judgment of God upon his life? If God makes any separation +of men in the world to come, he certainly cannot divide them into +perfect and imperfect men. Judged by any complete standard, all are +imperfect. Or if, without separation, God in any sense, in the most +inner way, passes judgment, how does approval fall upon any? And upon +whom does it fall? Must not every man who wishes to <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_154" id="page_154">{154}</a></span> be +clear and honest with himself fairly face these questions?</p> + +<p>And Christ's own thought of God as Father must be our key here. And +the matter may well be counted worth a more careful analysis than it +often gets. How does a father distinguish between what he calls an +obedient and a disobedient child? Both are faulty. How in any fair +sense may one be called obedient? To the earthly father, that child is +called an obedient child, not who is deliberately setting his will +against his father's with no intention to coöperate with the father's +purpose for him, but whose loyal intention is to do the father's will, +really to coöperate with the father in the father's own purpose for +the child's life. When, now, this child is carried away by some gust +of temptation and disobeys, and then returns in penitence to the +father, evidently viewing the sin, so far as his experience allows, as +the father views it, and heartily putting it away, the father, +<i>either with or without penalty</i>, restores the child to full +personal relation to himself; and that is the vital point. And, though +he neither judges the past life as without failure, nor expects the +future to be without failure, he approves the child, as in <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_155" id="page_155">{155}</a></span> a +true sense obedient. He is an approved child.</p> + +<p>What is it that satisfies the father in such a case? Upon what does +he rely in his hope for matured character in the child? What, in +biblical language, "covers" for the father the actual disobediences of +the past and the certain disobediences of the future, and enables him +in a sense to ignore both in his approval of the child? Certainly, the +present purpose of the child, the child's honest intention to +coöperate with the father in the father's purpose for him. Yes; but as +certainly, it seems to the writer, <i>not that alone</i>. The father's +hope for his child's steady growth in righteousness depends not only +on the child's present intention, but much more upon the father's own +intention never to give up in his attempt at any cost to help that +child to conquer himself.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_86" +id="R_86" href="#F_86">[86]</a></span> The father may be said here in +a true sense to propitiate himself; and his own fixed purpose has +become a partial substitute for the wavering purpose of the child.</p> + +<p>And the child's full righteousness is seen, not merely in an +attitude of immediate present obedience, but especially in his loyal +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_156" +id="page_156">{156}</a></span> acceptance of his filial relation—in +his honest surrender to his father's influence. And the father can now +say, Because my child accepts heartily his relation to me, and +honestly throws himself open to it to let it be to him all it can and +work its own work in him, I may approve him; for this relation to me +which he so takes has only to go on, to work out its complete results +in a matured character. In the hearty acceptance of this filial +relation to me, there is contained the promise of the end.</p> + +<p>Just this attitude exactly, and no other, it seems to the writer, +God takes toward men in his revelation in Christ. Christ is God's own +showing forth of himself. "God was in Christ reconciling the world +unto himself."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_87" id="R_87" +href="#F_87">[87]</a></span> "Propitiation," Beysclag truly says, "is +blotting out, making amends for sin in God's eyes. Now what can cover +the sin of the world in God's eyes? Only a personality and a deed +which contain the power of actually delivering the world from its +sin."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_88" id="R_88" +href="#F_88">[88]</a></span></p> + +<p>We have seen, it may be hoped, just how God's self-revealing in +Christ does have this actual power, and becomes, thus, a true +propitiation <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_157" +id="page_157">{157}</a></span> in the highest moral sense, in the only +sense in which God can wish a propitiation, and in the only sense in +which we can ever need a propitiation. Our final hope for that true +salvation, which is the sharing of the life of God and the involved +likeness of character with God, is in God's own long-suffering, +redeeming activity. Only as <i>that</i> may be remembered, in +connection with our surrender to it, may we hope to stand approved +before the judgment of God. We are not judged alone before the +judgment of God. In a very real sense the judge himself stands with +us. Not what God is able to believe about this man thought of as +standing alone, but what he may believe about this man standing in a +living, surrendering association with himself, is the ground of +judgment. We may not separate here the work of God and the work of +Christ, as the New Testament does not separate them. In constant +reliance upon the constant redeeming activity of the Father here and +hereafter, we children go hopefully on our way.</p> + +<p>Put into the language of the blood covenant, where the blood has +all its significance as life—the giving of life, the sharing of life, +the closest and most indissoluble union of <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_158" id="page_158">{158}</a></span> lives—this is to say, +there is no atonement, no reconciliation, no remission of sins, no +forgiveness—and these are all essentially identical terms—without +shedding of blood, that is, without complete giving of life on both +sides, Christ giving himself not only <i>for</i> us in seeking us out, +but <i>to</i> us in complete reconciliation and renewal of life. It +means that only God, the very life of God, sharing God's life, can +really save one from his sins. God must pour his life into one, and he +does, in Christ.</p> + +<p>This seems to be the heart of the whole matter; but certain +considerations may be still added, as indicating how far a purely +ethical and spiritual view of the atonement may go, in meeting the +human need expressed in these older terms of substitution and +propitiation.</p> + +<p>There must be a wrath of God against wilful sin, a complete +disapproval of it, and all the more because God loves the sinner. God +is a consuming fire for sin in us, because he loves us. That wrath +cannot be propitiated, that disapproval cannot be satisfied, in any +effective way, so long as the sin continues. The punishment of the sin +in its inevitable consequences, will go on in the <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_159" id="page_159">{159}</a></span> very +fidelity of God. But for any real satisfaction of God, the sin itself +must cease, and there must be assurance of righteousness to come. The +sinner must come to share God's hatred of the sin and God's positive +purpose of love. Hence the expiation of the sin, the propitiation of +the wrath of God, the satisfaction of God—so far as these terms still +have meaning, and so far as they express Christ's work—consist (1) in +winning men to repentance, to sharing God's hatred of their sin, (2) +in helping men to a real power against sin, and (3) in the assurance +of perfecting righteousness which is contained in the relation to God +honestly accepted by men. When, now, the unfilial spirit is thus +changed into a completely filial spirit—through the fullest +acceptance by the child of the father's purpose for him, and through +the child's throwing himself completely open to the influence of the +father—the personal relation <i>is</i> thereby inevitably changed, +personal reconciliation is achieved. It is impossible to think it +otherwise. And so the chief pain in the previous relation is done away +both for God and man; though the punishment, in the consequences of +sin in other respects, is not thereby set aside.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_160" +id="page_160">{160}</a></span> But, further, so far now as the power +of this new personal relation to God in Christ begins actively to +counteract the consequences of sin in us, as it will assuredly do, +God's work in Christ becomes a direct substitute for that punishment +of us that would else inevitably follow. And yet the process is wholly +ethical; for the results of righteousness can actually occur in us, +only in so far as we come into harmony with Christ's purpose for +us.</p> + +<p>Even so far, we may believe, does the social consciousness, in its +emphasis upon the mutual influence of persons go, in leading us into +the secret of the attainment of character—into the heart of God's +redemption of men.</p> + +<h4>IV. MUTUAL INFLUENCE FOR GOOD IN OUR PERSONAL RELATION<br /> +TO GOD</h4> + +<p>What, now, in the second place, does the mutual influence of men +for good mean for theology in the individual relation to God? Here it +may be said at once, that faith is as directly contagious as +character.</p> + +<p>1. <i>In Coming into the Kingdom.</i>—We are introduced through +others into all spheres of <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_161" +id="page_161">{161}</a></span> value, including friendship even with +God. In the atmosphere of those who already feel the value, our +interest is aroused; we find it possible at least to take those +initial steps of a dawning attention, which give the value opportunity +to make its own impression upon us, and bring us to an appreciation, +to a faith of our own. Only so is that most difficult of all tasks in +the redemption of a man—that first stirring of a new appetite, a new +desire, a new aspiration, a new ideal—accomplished.</p> + +<p>We are members one of another here to an extent that deserves ever +fresh emphasis. We cannot too often say to ourselves, Had it not been +that there were those who actually entered into the meaning of the +revelation of God in Christ—who, in John's language, "beheld his +glory"—the record of that revelation never could have come down to +us. Christianity must have perished at its birth. "Hence," in the +vital language of Herrmann, "the picture of his inner life could be +preserved in his church or 'fellowship' alone. But, further, this +picture so preserved can be understood only when we meet with men on +whom it has wrought its effect. We need communion with Christians in +order that, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_162" +id="page_162">{162}</a></span> from the picture of Jesus which his +Brotherhood has preserved, there may shine forth that inner life which +is the real heart of it. It is only when we see its effects, that our +eyes are opened to its reality so that we may thereby experience the +same effect. Thus we never apprehend the most important element in the +historical appearance of Jesus until his people make us feel it. The +testimony of the New Testament concerning Jesus is the work of his +church, and its exposition is the work of the church, through the life +which that church develops and gains for itself out of this treasure +which it possesses."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_89" id="R_89" +href="#F_89">[89]</a></span></p> + +<p>The Christian is no Melchizedek, then, without father or mother; he +comes into life in a community of life, and usually, moreover, through +the personal touch of some other individual life. It is the one primal +law, of life through life.</p> + +<p>2. <i>In Fellowship within the Kingdom.</i>—And not only in coming +into the kingdom, but also within the religious fellowship of the +kingdom, we are emphatically members one of another. In bringing us +into that love which is God's own life, God evidently has <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_163" id="page_163">{163}</a></span> no +intention of allowing us to cut ourselves off from our brethren, to +climb up to heaven by some little individual ladder of our own. That +humility or open-mindedness, which constitutes the first beatitude and +the initial step into the kingdom, and that self-sacrificing love, +which constitutes the last beatitude and the crown of the Christian +life, are both possible and cultivable only in personal relations to +others. No man ever got them alone. And, for this very reason, in the +discussion of the religious life, we found the New Testament guarding +most carefully against all over-estimation of marvelous experiences as +such. For these tended to make a man feel that he had such an +individual ladder of his own to heaven, and had no need, consequently, +of his brethren; and so led him into the very reverse of the +fundamental Christian qualities—into unteachableness instead of +humility and open-mindedness, and into censoriousness instead of love. +That objective attitude which is essential in all character and work +and happiness, cannot be unimportant in our specifically religious +life.</p> + +<p>Even in this most individual relation to God, then, men's outlook +is varied and but partial. We need to share, and can share, one <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_164" id="page_164">{164}</a></span> +another's visions. The meaning of the many-sidedness of even a great +human personality gets home to us only so—through the various +impressions gained by different men. Much more can God be revealed to +us, even approximately, only so. The great and surpassing value of the +New Testament lies exactly herein, that it gives the varied +impressions upon the first Christian generation of God's supreme +revelation—the most important individual reflections of Christ. The +New Testament comes to stand, thus, in no merely external and +mechanically authoritative relation to the life and faith of the +church, but in the most interior and vital relation. And Bible study +gets a new significance for us, as we see it, as at one and the same +time our chief way to our own vision of God's actual, concrete +self-revelation, and our deliverance from our merely subjective +dreaming. We come to share in some living way the vision of these +others who have seen most directly and most largely.</p> + +<p>3. <i>In Intercessory Prayer.</i>—One particular application to +our religious life, of this conviction of the social consciousness of +our mutual influence, seems worthy of mention—its bearing upon +intercessory prayer. Few <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_165" +id="page_165">{165}</a></span> other things in religion, one may +suspect, seem less real to modern men. Can we ground the matter a +little more deeply for ourselves, and give it reality, by showing its +close connection with this deep-rooted conviction of the social +consciousness?</p> + +<p>We have already seen,<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_90" +id="R_90" href="#F_90">[90]</a></span> if character and love are to be +realities to us, if the world is to be a real training-ground for +moral character, and not a mere play-world—a nursery continually set +to rights from without, that we must all be most closely knit +together; that our choices must have effects in the lives of others; +that we must be bound up in one bundle of life. And we do affect one +another's lives in a thousand ways. In manifold directions we +condition the happiness and temptations of one another. The unspoken +mood of another, an expression of countenance, a tone, an emphasis, +may affect our whole day.</p> + +<p>Now, if the spiritual world is real at all, it is to be counted +upon. Apparently, there is such a thing, for example, as a spiritual +atmosphere in an audience—not, it may well be supposed, a magical +matter, but really determined by the tone of the minds composing <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_166" id="page_166">{166}</a></span> the +audience. The actual mood of the hearers and of the speaker makes a +difference. Results, great and important, are so changed often quite +unconsciously. It may well be that God is the medium in all this. The +attitude of the auditors is like unconscious, silent praying to +God—the praying of their life, of their spirit.</p> + +<p>But, whether one cares to look at this special case in such a way +or not, we are, in any event, in our spiritual lives in the deepest +way members one of another. Our spiritual condition inevitably affects +others. We cannot sow to the flesh and reap life anywhere, in +ourselves or in others. This is particularly true, of course, of those +to whom we are bound in the closest life relations. That this is +absolutely true in normal personal relations, when we are in the +presence of our friends, all of us fully believe. The question simply +is, May this law of mutual influence hold of those bound up with our +lives even when they are distant from us or estranged? In giving the +privilege of intercessory prayer, it may well be believed, God simply +allows us to be, even then, what we are always so fully under other +circumstances—an influence upon them, a condition of <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_167" id="page_167">{167}</a></span> the +good and growth of others. <i>He simply allows the regular law of the +spiritual and moral world to hold without exception.</i> We are still, +though distant or estranged, members one of another. It would be a +very human, defective, faulty God, who could not put us thus in touch +with our loved ones everywhere. But this is possible through +<i>him</i>, and therefore in prayer, and under strictly ethical and +spiritual conditions, and not as a matter of mere whimsical and wilful +will on our part, and it opens no door to magical superstition. Is not +the recognition of the place and value of intercessory prayer, then, +an only just extension of the prime conviction of the social +consciousness?</p> + +<h4>V. MUTUAL INFLUENCE FOR GOOD IN CONFESSIONS OF FAITH</h4> + +<p>Theology has, once more, in the third place, to recognize the +importance of mutual influence for good in confession of faith, in +creeds. When, to-day, we seek the common grounds of belief for +Christian thinkers, so far as the social consciousness really moves +us, we approach the problem in a way somewhat different from that of +previous generations. <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_168" +id="page_168">{168}</a></span> We do not now seek to elaborate a +second, modern Westminster confession; nor do we seek a mere average +of Christian ideas that in reality expresses no one's whole living +thought. Still less is there sought the barest minimum of Christian +belief. Rather, in harmony with the social consciousness, we seek a +unity that is organic. Our age, therefore, must recognize that, in the +confession of its faith as in all else, we are genuinely members one +of another. The unity sought not only tolerates differences, but +welcomes and justifies them, as themselves helps to a deeper unity. It +believes in equality, but not in identity.</p> + +<p>It is true that Christianity looks everywhere to life; and we may +be sure that any statement of Christian doctrine that does not +obviously bear on living is still inadequate and incorrect. It is true +that we do well to emphasize the strictly religious and practical +purpose of the Bible; that the Bible is interested in both nature and +history so far and only so far as either reveals God and inspires to +godly living. It is true that in all Christian thinking Christ is our +ultimate appeal.</p> + +<p>But, on the other hand, we must not confuse the issue. We cannot +expect agreement <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_169" +id="page_169">{169}</a></span> in detailed intellectual statements +even with fullest loyalty to Christ, and the most earnest desire after +truth. To each his own message. Nor can we confine, nor is it +desirable to confine, expressions of Christian faith to the merely +practical side. We need to seek to <i>understand</i> the meaning of +our Christian experience, not only for the sake of our intellectual +peace, but also for the sake of deepening our Christian experience +itself. Now, it is here contended that in our confessions of Christian +faith we need one another, and that complete uniformity of belief and +statement is both impossible and undesirable.</p> + +<p>1. <i>Complete Uniformity of Belief and Statement +Impossible.</i>—It is impossible, for, in the first place, it is +difficult, in any case, to tell our real inner creed. Some of its most +important articles are quite certain to be implicit and unconfessed, +even to ourselves. The only important creed, in the case of the +individual, is that which finds its expression in life. There are +assumptions implied in deeds and spirit; and the spirit of a man +throws more light on his real creed than his formal statements do. His +doctrines may be radical, his spirit thoroughly constructive, or +<i>vice versa</i>. If all thought tends to pass into act, <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_170" id="page_170">{170}</a></span> as +modern psychology insists, we have a right to urge that those articles +of a man's creed which find expression in living, are for him the +really important articles. The will has a creed, as well as the +intellect, and the real creed is the creed of life rather than of +lips; it is wrought out, rather than thought out. And this real, +inner, living creed probably no man can state with accuracy even in +his own case. And if he is ever able even approximately to do so, it +will be at the end, rather than at the beginning, of his life's work +and experience.</p> + +<p>Moreover, complete uniformity of belief and statement is +impossible, for, even exactly the same words cannot mean the same to +different individuals, for they are interpreted out of a different +experience; they cannot mean precisely the same thing, even to the +same individual, at different times, for his interpreting experience, +too, is a changing thing. We need sometimes to remind ourselves that +there is never any literal transfer of thought from mind to mind, +still less from statement to mind; all thinking of even the most +passive kind has an element of creation in it, for terms must be +interpreted, and the interpretation is inevitably limited by previous +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_171" +id="page_171">{171}</a></span> experience. Sabatier<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_91" id="R_91" href="#F_91">[91]</a></span> +is quite right, therefore, in asserting that credal statements must +change their meaning just as words change. But it is to be noted that +this principle means not only that unalterable doctrine, in this +sense, is impossible between the generations; but also that identical +doctrine is impossible in the same generation.</p> + +<p>Out of the different experiences, too, grow the different points of +view and the different emphases. And these different points of view, +and the different distribution of emphasis, give the same creed very +different meanings for different men. It is as impossible to avoid +this, as it is to avoid change and individuality. It is true of a +man's creed as of his environment, that the only effective portions +are those to which he attends—those which he emphasizes, not those to +which he gives a bare assent; and this varying attention and emphasis +cannot be the same in different individuals. The only logical outcome +of a thorough-going attempt to reach an identical creed is the church +of one member.</p> + +<p>2. <i>Complete Uniformity of Belief and Statement +Undesirable.</i>—But complete uniformity of belief and statement is +not only impossible; <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_172" +id="page_172">{172}</a></span> it is undesirable. For, in the first +place, it is only by these differing but supplementary finite +expressions that we can approximate to the infinite truth. Like +Leibnitz's mirrors in the market-place, it is only by combining the +points of view of all that a complete representation is possible. We +need one another here, as elsewhere; we need the fellowship of the +church, and of the whole church; the strictly individual view must be +fragmentary. Our message needs the supplement of the messages of +others; through each member God has something unique to say. They +without us, we without them, are not to be made perfect. We need to +share, in such measure as is possible, the experiences of others; but +this is possible only through vital contact.</p> + +<p>Moreover, we are not to forget how truth comes—not by surrender of +convictions, not by the silence of each, but by each standing +earnestly for the truth which is given to him, in a union of +conviction and charity. For only he who has convictions can be +tolerant, as only he who has fears can be courageous.</p> + +<p>Once more, we cannot and must not simply repeat each other. Nothing +is so fatal to spiritual life as dishonesty. To attempt an <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_173" id="page_173">{173}</a></span> +identical creed involves something of such untrue repetition of the +experience of others. For, as Herrmann has said, doctrines are an +expression of life <i>already present</i>, and are of value only so; +they are not themselves a condition of life. If the doctrines we +profess are not the honest expression of a real life in us, they are a +hindrance, not a help. "Conscious untruth tends to drive from +Christ."</p> + +<p>For every one of these reasons, now, it is positively undesirable +to forbid varying theories or to check the varied expressions of +Christian faith, whether in accordance or not with certain standard +formulas. A growing life requires a growing expression, which must be +justified by its history, not dogmatically by reference to some +supposed fixed standard of doctrine in the past. The very meaning and +health of Christian fellowship demand that we should welcome and +encourage the honest expression of the varied manifestations of the +One Spirit, that we may be the more certain to get the whole truth, +the whole life which God intends. We are members one of another, in +doctrine as in life.</p> + +<p>It becomes increasingly clear, thus, where the real Christian unity +is, and where the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_174" +id="page_174">{174}</a></span> common grounds of Christian belief must +be sought. The real unity of Christians is in their common life, in +the common experience, in the possession of the common personal +self-revelation of God in Christ, in the inworking of the One Spirit. +It is the meaning of this one central Christian experience, which we +strive to express in our doctrinal statements. Our <i>expressions</i> +must vary; the life, the personal relation to God, is one. The best +analogy we have of the case lies in what the same great friend means +to different persons. Our creeds are at best poor and partial +expressions of the meaning for us of the divine friendship, of God's +self-revelation to us. It is, then, precisely in our Christian +experience and in that personal relation to God revealed in Christ +which makes a man a Christian at all, that all the common grounds of +Christian belief lie.</p> + +<p>The solution of Christian unity here, that is, is not by increasing +abstraction, but by frank concreteness; not by false simplicity, but +by living fullness; not by relation to propositions, but by relation +to facts; not by emphasis on natural religion, but by emphasis on +historical religion; not by bringing nature into prominence, but human +nature; <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_175" +id="page_175">{175}</a></span> not by relation to things, but by +relation to persons, to the one great world fact, the one person, to +Christ. "I am the Way." The Christian faith is faith in a person; the +Christian confession of faith is confession of Christ. And if we are +really in earnest with this word Christian, we already have our basis +of unity in our personal relation to Christ, our common Lord. But that +personal relation to God in Christ is always more than a credal +statement <i>can</i> express, though we may never cease to attempt +such expression; and for the sake of the larger realization, by +ourselves and by the church, of the meaning of the personal relation +to Christ, we must welcome every honest expression of his Christian +life by another. Altogether, we shall at best but dimly shadow forth +its full meaning.</p> + +<p>And such a concrete relation to the personal Christ is a far better +test of genuine Christian faith than any creed, whether more or less +elaborate, since in the personal relation character inevitably comes +out; and any test that allows even for the moment the ignoring of the +ethical, cannot remain even intellectually adequate, for Christian +doctrine looks always and certainly to life. Even if one is thinking +<i>only</i> of the correct intellectual <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_176" id="page_176">{176}</a></span> expression of the +common Christian life—the maintenance of orthodoxy, so far as that is +possible to us—it should be remembered that the most conservative of +all influences is love of a person, and, by no means, subscription to +a set of propositions. Would Christ so think? Would he so +speak?—these are questions far more certain to keep Christian +<i>thinking</i> true, than any intellectual test of man's +devising.</p> + +<p>We do not expect, therefore, we do not seek, any common grounds of +belief for Christian thinkers, other than are involved in the simple +fact that we are Christians at all, in the common recognition of the +revelation of God in Christ—of the Lordship of Christ. We confess +Christ. For, "no man can say, Jesus is Lord, but in the Holy Spirit." +And "other foundation can no man lay, than that which is laid, which +is Jesus Christ."</p> + +<p>Now, in this common confession, it is here especially maintained, +we are, as everywhere, "members one of another" and need one another; +and the unity we seek, therefore, is not the unity of identical credal +statement—which can only make us isolated atoms not necessary to one +another—but the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_177" +id="page_177">{177}</a></span> deeper and larger organic unity of the +richly varying manifestations of the common life in Christ. We may +come, through the witness of another, to an appreciation of Christ +which is really our own, but to which we should not have come if the +other had not spoken. Men do mutually influence one another for good, +in their confessions of Christian faith.</p> + +<h4>VI. THE CONSEQUENT IMPORTANCE OF THE DOCTRINE<br /> +OF THE CHURCH</h4> + +<p>In this recognition of the vital and essential importance of mutual +influence in the attainment of character, in the individual relation +to God, and in creed, theology is brought to a new sense of the +significance of the doctrine of the church. On the one hand, it cannot +derive its importance from having to do with an unalterably fixed and +infallibly organized external authority; and, on the other hand, it +can be no longer an unimportant addendum concerned only with methods +of organization and government, and with ecclesiastical ordinances and +procedure. So far as the social consciousness has influence upon +theology at this point, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_178" +id="page_178">{178}</a></span> theology must see that the doctrine of +the church is the doctrine of that priceless, living, personal +fellowship, in which alone Christian character, Christian faith, and +Christian confession can arise and can continue. The doctrine of the +church becomes thus the doctrine of the very life and growth of +Christianity in the world. It is the doctrine of the real kingdom of +God, Christ's own great central theme.</p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_78" id="F_78" href="#R_78" class="label">[78]</a> +Cf. above, pp. 35 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_79" id="F_79" href="#R_79" class="label">[79]</a> +<i>The Elements of Sociology</i>, pp. 119, 120, 121. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_80" id="F_80" href="#R_80" class="label">[80]</a> +<i>The Ideal Life</i>, p. 149. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_81" id="F_81" href="#R_81" class="label">[81]</a> +<i>The Place of Christ in Modern Theology</i>, p. 455. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_82" id="F_82" href="#R_82" class="label">[82]</a> +James, <i>Psychology</i>, Vol. II, p. 579. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_83" id="F_83" href="#R_83" class="label">[83]</a> +Cf. Hebrews, 10:10. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_84" id="F_84" href="#R_84" class="label">[84]</a> +<i>An Outline of Christian Theology</i>, p. 335. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_85" id="F_85" href="#R_85" class="label">[85]</a> +<i>Op. cit.</i>, p. 459. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_86" id="F_86" href="#R_86" class="label">[86]</a> +Cf. Romans 8:26-39. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_87" id="F_87" href="#R_87" class="label">[87]</a> +II Corinthians, 5:19. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_88" id="F_88" href="#R_88" class="label">[88]</a> +<i>The Theology of the New Testament</i>, Vol. II, p. 448. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_89" id="F_89" href="#R_89" class="label">[89]</a> +<i>The Communion of the Christian with God</i>, p. 61; cf. p. 87. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_90" id="F_90" href="#R_90" class="label">[90]</a> +Cf. above, p. 32. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_91" id="F_91" href="#R_91" class="label">[91]</a> +<i>The Vitality of Christian Dogmas and their Power of Evolution.</i> +<br /><br /> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_179" +id="page_179">{179}</a></span></p> + + + +<h3>CHAPTER XII<br /><br /> <span class="h90"><i>THE INFLUENCE +OF THE DEEPENING SENSE OF THE<br /> VALUE AND SACREDNESS OF THE +PERSON<br />UPON THEOLOGY</i></span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">In</span> the discussion of the influence of +the social consciousness upon theological doctrine, we turn now to ask +concerning the third element of the social consciousness, How does the +deepening sense of the value and sacredness of the person affect +theology?</p> + +<p>And with this sense of the value and sacredness of the person, we +may well include, so far as the influence upon theology is concerned, +the remaining elements of the social consciousness—the deepening +sense of obligation, and of love. For, as we have already seen, the +sense of obligation and of love follow so inevitably from a deep sense +of the value and sacredness of the person, that it would be a needless +refinement, probably, to try to analyze out their separate influence +upon theological thinking. We should find them all leading us to +essentially the same great emphases.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_180" +id="page_180">{180}</a></span> When, now, through the social +consciousness, the personal has become the supreme value for us, and +regard for it our eternal motive and goal, we cannot fail to demand +that theology give a real personality to God and man—a consciousness +marked, in Professor Howison's language, with "that recognition and +reverence of the personal initiative of other minds which is at once +the sign and the test of the true person."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_92" id="R_92" href="#F_92">[92]</a></span></p> + +<h4>I. THE RECOGNITION OF THE PERSONAL IN MAN</h4> + +<p>In the first place, the social sense of the value and sacredness of +the person will emphasize the full personality of man.</p> + +<p>1. <i>Man's Personal Separateness from God.</i>—The sense of the +value of the person cannot admit for a moment such a one-sided +emphasis upon a universal cosmic evolution, or upon the immanence of +God, as should make impossible a true personality in man. It seeks, in +its view of both God and man, a really "<i>personal</i> idealism." It +does not forget, but earnestly asserts, the dependence of all other +spirits upon God; and, consequently, looks for no metaphysical +separateness in this sense <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_181" +id="page_181">{181}</a></span> from God. But a genuine recognition of +the personality of man does require that man be conceived as separate +from God in just this sense: (1) that he has a clear +self-consciousness of his own, and (2) that he has real moral +initiative, which makes his volition truly his own. These two factors +constitute all of separateness that need be demanded for man. +Possessing these, he is "outside of God" in the only sense in which a +"personal idealism" feels concerned to assert separateness. But for +these factors it is concerned; for without them, it believes, no truly +ideal view, no moral world, no religious life, are possible.</p> + +<p>2. <i>Emphasis Upon Man's Moral Initiative.</i>—In particular, the +application of the sense of the value and sacredness of the person in +theology, means the emphatic recognition of the moral initiative of +man—of the possession of a real will of his own. The whole social +consciousness, especially in this third element of it, rests upon the +assumption that man has worth, as a being capable of character as well +as of happiness, and so deserves in some worthy sense to be called a +child of God. If the social consciousness is, as we have seen, with +any fairness to be called the recognition <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_182" id="page_182">{182}</a></span> of the fully +personal,<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_93" id="R_93" +href="#F_93">[93]</a></span> this reverence for the personal +initiative of men cannot be lacking in it. Its influence upon theology +at this point, therefore, is hardly to be doubted.</p> + +<p>And theology itself is vitally concerned. For the whole possibility +of the conceptions of government and providence requires this. These +terms are words without meaning, having absolutely no place in +theology or philosophy, if man has no moral initiative. Nor should it +escape our notice, that we strike at the very root of all possible +reverence for God, if we deny a real initiative to man. We have no +possible philosophic explanation of either sin or error, consistent +with any real reverence for God, if a true human will is denied.<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_94" id="R_94" href="#F_94">[94]</a></span> +In Professor Bowne's vigorous language: In a system of necessity +"every thought, belief, conviction, whether truth or superstition, +arises with equal necessity with every other.... On this plane of +necessary effect the actual is all, and the ideal distinctions of true +and false have as little meaning as they would have on the plane of +mechanical forces.... The <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_183" +id="page_183">{183}</a></span> only escape from the overthrow of +reason involved in the fact of error lies in the assumption of +freedom." Moreover, if real human initiative is denied to men, we +conceive God as having really less respect for persons in his dealing +with them, than the most elementary ethics requires of men in their +relations to one another. A one-sided doctrine of immanence, thus, +degrades both man and God. It degrades man, in denying to him a true +personality, and so making him simply a thing. It degrades God, in +making him the real responsible cause of all sin and error, and in +making him treat possible persons as things. The influence of the +social consciousness, which leads us to measure the moral growth of a +man and of a civilization by the deepening sense of reverence for the +person, is fairly decisive at this point. It <i>must</i> see in God +the most absolute guarding of man's personality, and especially of his +moral initiative.</p> + +<p>3. <i>Man, a Child of God.</i>—The Christian faith, that man is a +child of God, is a faithful expression of the insistence of the social +consciousness upon the recognition of the full personality of man. It +expresses both man's entire dependence upon God for his being <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_184" id="page_184">{184}</a></span> and +maintenance, and at the same time his infinite value and sacredness as +a spirit made in the image of God, capable of indefinite progress, and +capable of personal relation to God. It voices thus Christianity's +characteristic "humbly-proud" conception of man—humble in view of the +eternal and infinite plans of God; proud, as "called to an +imperishable work in the world." It is, indeed, but a concrete +statement of that faith in love at the heart of things, and in the +all-embracing plan of a faithful God, which we found required, if the +social consciousness itself was to have any justification.<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_95" id="R_95" +href="#F_95">[95]</a></span></p> + +<h4>II. THE RECOGNITION OF THE PERSONAL IN CHRIST</h4> + +<p>In the second place, under this impulse of the sense of the value +and sacredness of the person, theology is likely to insist on the +recognition of the personal in the conception of Christ.</p> + +<p>1. <i>Christ a Personal Revelation of God.</i>—This recognition of +the personal in Christ will mean, first, that we are to conceive +Christ as a <i>personal</i> revelation of God, rather than as <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_185" id="page_185">{185}</a></span> +containing in himself a divine substance.<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_96" id="R_96" href="#F_96">[96]</a></span> It cannot forget, +that if God is a person, and men are persons, the adequate +self-revelation of God to men can be made only in a truly personal +life; and that men need above all, in their relation to God, some +manifestation of his ethical will, and this can be shown only in the +character of a person. A merely metaphysical conception of the +divinity of Christ in terms of substance or essence, as these are +commonly thought, must, therefore, wholly fail to satisfy. We must be +able to recognize and bow before the personal will of the personal God +revealed in Christ, if we are really to find God through him. A strong +sense of the personal, then, such as the social consciousness evinces, +must see in Christ, above all, a personal revelation of a person.</p> + +<p>2. <i>Emphasizing the Moral and Spiritual in Asserting the +Supremacy of Christ.</i>—This implies that the dominant sense of the +value and sacredness of the person will certainly tend to bring into +prominence the moral and spiritual in asserting the supremacy of +Christ, rather than the metaphysical or the simply miraculous. So far +as these latter come into its representation at all, they will follow +rather <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_186" +id="page_186">{186}</a></span> than precede, and be accepted because +of the moral and spiritual, or as simply working hypotheses enabling +us to bring into a thought-unity what we have to recognize in the +moral and spiritual realm. If one faces the matter fully and frankly, +is it not plain that Christians of all shades of belief are +increasingly finding the real reason for their faith in Christ in his +moral and spiritual supremacy? Many may choose to <i>express</i> their +faith in him, when once reached, in terms of the miraculous or +metaphysical; but the miraculous and the metaphysical are not the +primary <i>reasons</i> for their faith. It is the inner spirit of +Christ himself which really masters us and calls out our confident +faith and our eager submission. And it is only when we have already +gotten this sense of the stupendousness of his personality, that the +so-called miraculous in his life becomes to our thought natural and +fitting, and we are driven to think him standing in some unique +relation to God and so requiring to be conceived in unique +metaphysical terms.</p> + +<p>It is easy, no doubt, to indulge in a false polemic against the +miraculous and metaphysical. One of the surest bits of autobiography +we have from Christ, the narrative of <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_187" id="page_187">{187}</a></span> the temptations, +implies, as Sanday has acutely pointed out,<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_97" id="R_97" href="#F_97">[97]</a></span> the clear +consciousness on the part of Christ of the possession of what we call +supernatural powers. It is a far less simple problem to rid the +gospels of the miraculous element, than our age, with its greatly +exaggerated estimate of the mathematico-mechanical view of the world, +is likely to think. The so-called miraculous in connection with Christ +is not to be impatiently and dogmatically set aside.<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_98" id="R_98" href="#F_98">[98]</a></span> +So, too, the demand of thought, that we form finally some metaphysical +conception of the great personality which we meet in Christ cannot be +denied as wholly illegitimate. All this is to be freely granted and +asserted.</p> + +<p>But it is of the greatest importance for Christian thought, that it +still keep Christ's own absolute subordination of both the miraculous +and metaphysical to the moral and the spiritual. The same narrative of +the temptation, that so clearly implies supernatural powers in Christ, +has its whole point in Christ's answering determination absolutely to +subordinate these supernatural powers to moral and spiritual ends. His +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_188" +id="page_188">{188}</a></span> whole ministry evinces the greatest +pains upon this point. And he evidently thinks a theory of his +metaphysical relation to God (as ordinarily conceived) of so little +vital importance that even such slight hints as we get of it in the +New Testament apparently do not come from him at all. The present +tendency, therefore, naturally demanded by the social consciousness, +to emphasize the moral and spiritual in Christ in asserting his +supremacy, is quite in harmony with Christ's own insistence. He will +be followed for what he is in himself.</p> + +<p>The real supremacy of Christ, his truest divinity, we may be sure, +comes out for our time in those statements which we are able to make +concerning his inner spirit. Here, and here only, the real power of +his personality gets hold upon us. What are these grounds of the +supremacy of Christ? How is it that we come to God through him?</p> + +<p>3. <i>The Moral and Spiritual Grounds of the Supremacy of +Christ.</i><span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_99" id="R_99" +href="#F_99">[99]</a></span>—(1) In the first place, <i>Jesus Christ +is the greatest in the greatest sphere</i>, that of the moral and +spiritual; and this, by <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_189" +id="page_189">{189}</a></span> common consent of all men. Both the +depth and the consensus of conviction concerning Christ are profoundly +significant. If our earth has ever seen one of whom it could be truly +said, He is a moral and spiritual authority, preëminently the one +great authority in this greatest sphere,—that person is Jesus Christ. +Seeing the moral problem more broadly than any other ever saw it, +tracing the motives of life more deeply than any other ever traced +them, applying those principles of the life which he sees with a tact +and delicacy and skill that no other ever approached, speaking with an +authority in this moral and spiritual sphere to which no other can for +a moment lay claim,—this man is easily the greatest in the greatest +sphere.</p> + +<p>It is, perhaps, to say only the same thing in a little different +way, when one says with Fairbairn, that Christ is transcendent among +founders of religion, "and to be transcendent here is to be +transcendent everywhere, for religion is the supreme factor in the +organizing and the regulating of our personal and collective +life."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_100" id="R_100" +href="#F_100">[100]</a></span> The present age is, more than any +other, the age of the scientific study of religion. The last forty +years, indeed, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_190" +id="page_190">{190}</a></span> have seen such attention to the study +of comparative religion as the world never saw before. What has been +the outcome of that study? To make the relative position of Jesus +among the founders of religion lower? I do not so understand it. No, +the outcome is such that it is a manifestly inadequate statement to +say, that he is transcendent among the founders of religion. The very +most that we may hope to say about the founder of any other religion +is, that in some single particular at a long distance he can be +brought into comparison with Jesus. But let one think for a moment +what it means for a man to be a founder of religion. We talk of +leadership. Do we know what a founder of religion does? He makes the +light, in which millions of men look upon all the events of their +life, in which they see the past of the world's history, in which they +look forward to the entire future. The very mood and atmosphere of +men's lives are determined by these founders of religion; and among +these preëminent leaders, Jesus, beyond all mistake, is +transcendent.</p> + +<p>Let the nature of his kingdom, too, be his witness. He calmly aims +to found a kingdom that shall be spiritual, universal, <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_191" id="page_191">{191}</a></span> +eternal. One must face the fact that this man of Nazareth in Syrian +Galilee, purposes in coolness of deliberation to found a kingdom that +shall be absolutely spiritual, that shall make no appeal to any of the +lower elements of man; one must see that this man, in those +temptations through which he passed concerning the form of his work, +deliberately set aside the kingdom by bread, the kingdom by marvel and +ecstasy, and the kingdom by force, and purposed to found a kingdom +solely upon moral and spiritual forces. And observe that he +confidently expects this kingdom to be universal—appealing to men of +all races and of all times, and to be eternal—still standing when all +else shall have passed away. And upon his belief in this character of +his kingdom he stakes his life, and calmly gives to himself as the +goal of his life the establishment of just such a kingdom; and remains +to the end confident of his success. The mere vitality of will in such +a purpose is hard to take in, and alone may well give us pause.</p> + +<p>And because he is the greatest in the greatest sphere, transcendent +among founders of religion, the founder of a kingdom spiritual, +universal, and eternal, he becomes <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_192" id="page_192">{192}</a></span> for us a "personalized +conscience," a spiritual, moral authority for us even beyond our own +conscience—an authority that grows upon us with our growth, and +submission to which is earth's highest moral test.</p> + +<p>(2) And there must be added to this first proposition, that Jesus +is the greatest in the greatest sphere, a second: <i>He alone is the +sinless and impenitent one.</i> And it is to be noticed that it is +this man who sees more clearly than any other the moral and spiritual, +who knows, as no other does, what character is and what moral life +means,—it is he, who claims to be the sinless one. No other ever +intelligently made this claim; for no other was it ever intelligently +made. The words of the great historian Ranke seem to us to be simple +truth when he says: "More guiltless and more powerful, more exalted +and more holy has naught ever been on earth than his conduct, his +life, and his death. The human race knows nothing that could be +brought even afar off into comparison with it." Only such an one could +intelligently make for himself the claim of sinlessness. And for no +other was this claim of sinlessness ever intelligently made. Men know +each other too well to make it for others when moral consciousness +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_193" +id="page_193">{193}</a></span> has fully awakened. But he fights his +battle in the wilderness, and there is no record of failure so far as +he himself can see it, and none that disciple ever ascribed.</p> + +<p>And this claim of sinlessness for Christ is to be urged, not so +much because of any special statements by Christ as because of that +remarkable fact to which Dr. Bushnell has called attention,—his +impenitence. Jesus alone among all good men is a man of "impenitent +piety;" and by this he is marked off absolutely from every other good +man. What happens in the life of any other good man is this: that, as +he goes forward, the sense of sin grows upon him, the ideal rises +before him and he feels increasingly that his own life is inferior to +it. Of Jesus this is not true. He shows no sign of consciousness of +failure. There is no evidence that he feels that he has fallen short +in any degree. He is absolutely without that universal characteristic +of all other good men, absolutely without penitence. Contrast him for +a moment with the man, who perhaps all would agree was the greatest of +all his disciples, the man to whose devotion there seems to be no +limit—the Apostle Paul; and notice, that years after his persecution +of the church and of the <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_194" +id="page_194">{194}</a></span> cause of Jesus, with growing sense of +what Jesus is, and of his own inexhaustible debt to him, there comes +over him with increasing, not lessening, power the sense of his sin, +and he writes to the Ephesians, "Unto me, who am less than the least +of all saints, was this grace given me that I might preach unto the +Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ;" and in one of the very +last letters that comes down to us from him, says again, "Faithful is +the saying and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into +the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief." What evidence have we +that Christ ever felt in the slightest degree such penitence?</p> + +<p>(3) But more than this is true. <i>With the highest ideal, Jesus +not only does not consciously fall short of it, but consciously rises +up to it</i>, and, as Herrmann says, "compels us to admit that he does +rise to it." It were very much that a man with any ideal, however +inferior, should be able to say to himself, I have not fallen short of +this ideal; but that one, who sees more clearly than any other in the +realm of the moral and spiritual, and who has an ideal of simply +absolute love and of unbounded trust in God,—that he should show not +only no consciousness of <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_195" +id="page_195">{195}</a></span> falling short, but should consciously +rise to his ideal and compel us to admit that he rises to it: this is +a fact unparalleled in the history of the world. It is far more than +mere sinlessness; there is here a positiveness of moral achievement so +great—a fact so tremendous—that we seem able but feebly to take it +in.</p> + +<p>(4) And even that is not all. <i>Jesus has such a character that we +can transfer it feature by feature to God</i>, not only with no sense +of blasphemy, not only with no sense of his coming short, but with +complete satisfaction. I do not now ask at all as to any man's +metaphysical theory about Jesus Christ; I only ask that it be noticed +that those who question common theories altogether still get their +ideal of God from Jesus Christ; and that this is the wonderful thing +that has happened on our earth: that there has once lived a man—daily +moving about among men, a concrete circumstantial account of whose +life in many particulars we have—the features of whose character one +can transfer absolutely to God and say, That is what I mean by God. +One simply cannot add anything to the character of God himself in the +highest moments of his imagination, that is <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_196" id="page_196">{196}</a></span> not already revealed in +Jesus Christ. I take it that the words of Fairbairn are literally +true: he was "the first being who had realized for men the idea of the +Divine." When, therefore, Philip said to him, "Lord, show us the +Father and it sufficeth us," he could only reply as he might any day +to us, "Have I been so long time with you, and dost thou not know me, +Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father."</p> + +<p>(5) And one cannot stop here. <i>Jesus is consciously able to +redeem all men.</i> With such sense of the meaning of sin and of moral +conduct as no other ever had, understanding, therefore, the sin and +need of men as no other ever did, and having such a vision of what it +is perfectly to share the life of God as no other ever had, still, +facing the masses of men, he could say to himself, "I am able to take +these men and lift them into the very presence of God and present them +spotless before the throne of his glory." Have we taken in what it +means, that, in the consciousness of a man in form like ourselves, +there could be, even for a moment, the actual belief that he was the +one that was to take away the sin of the world, and had power to +redeem men absolutely unto God? In <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_197" id="page_197">{197}</a></span> another's words: "Jesus +knows no more sacred task than to point men to his own person." He is +himself God's greatest gift, himself "the way, the truth, the +life,"—not only fighting his own battles, but consciously able to +redeem all men.</p> + +<p>(6) This simply implies, as Dr. Denison has suggested, that +<i>Jesus has such God-consciousness and such sense of mission as would +simply topple any other brain that the world has ever known into +insanity</i>, but which simply keeps him sweet, normal, rational, +living the most wholesome and simple and noble life the world has ever +seen. How are we to explain that fact? On the one hand, the sense of +being of even a little importance in the kingdom of God proves +singularly intoxicating to men. How often, when one is strongly +possessed by the idea that he is a special channel of manifestation +for God, do moral sanity, influence, and character all suffer! On the +other hand, there is no burden of suffering that men can bear so great +as suffering in the sin of one loved—thus bearing the sin of another. +But here is one who can believe that, when men come to him and simply +see him as he is, they catch their best vision of God; here is one who +bears consciously <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_198" +id="page_198">{198}</a></span> the sin of all men, and who can believe +that he has absolute power to revolutionize the lives of other men and +make them what they were meant originally to be, children of God; and +yet, believing this, can, under that consciousness, keep sweet and +normal, wholesome and simple, energetically ethical and thoroughly +rational,—can keep sane. Indeed, he lives a life so sane, that, to +pass even from some of our best religious books into the simple +atmosphere of the story of his life often seems like passing from the +super-heated, artificially lighted, heavily perfumed and exhausted +atmosphere of the crowded drawing-room into the open fresh air of day +under the heaven of God. In the very act of the most stupendous +self-assertion, Jesus can still characterize himself as "meek and +lowly of heart," and we feel no self-contradiction—so completely has +he harmonized for even our unconscious feeling his transcendent +self-consciousness and his humble simplicity of life. Has the world +anywhere a phenomenon comparable to this?</p> + +<p>(7) In consequence of all this, <i>Jesus is in fact the only person +in the history of the race who can call out absolute trust</i>. As +little children, we knew something of what it meant to have <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_199" id="page_199">{199}</a></span> +complete trust. There were a few years when it seemed to us that there +was nothing in either power or character that was not true of our +fathers and mothers. We soon lost such trust, even as children. Is +there any way back to the childlike spirit? Let us ponder these golden +words of Herrmann: "The childlike spirit can only arise within us when +our experience is the same as a child's; in other words, when we meet +with a personal life which compels us to trust it without reserve. +Only the person of Jesus can arouse such trust in a man who has +awakened to moral self-consciousness. If such a man surrenders himself +to anything or any one else, he throws away not only his trust, but +himself." There has been one life lived on earth, in whose hands one +may put himself with absolute confidence and have no fear as to the +result. Jesus, and Jesus alone, can call out absolute trust.</p> + +<p>(8) Moreover, <i>Jesus is the only life ever lived among men in +whom God certainly finds us, and in whom we certainly find God</i>. +And, once again, I am not now asking whether one is able to come to +any theory of the nature of Christ. That is a matter of comparative +indifference. The great fact is this: That <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_200" id="page_200">{200}</a></span> there has been lived +among us men such a life that, if a man will simply put himself in the +presence of it and stay there, he will have brought home to him with +unmistakable conviction the fact that God is, and is touching him and +that he is touching God; that, coupled with such a sense as he never +had before of his sin, there will be also the sense of forgiveness and +reconciliation with God, and so, such evidence of the contact of God +with his life as he can find nowhere else. So Harnack believes: "When +God and everything that is sacred threaten to disappear in the +darkness, or our doom is pronounced; when the mighty forces of +inexorable nature seem to overwhelm us, and the bounds of good and +evil to dissolve; when, weak and weary, we despair of finding God at +all in this dismal world,—it is then that the personality of Christ +may save us."</p> + +<p>(9) And all this means, finally, that <i>Jesus is for us the ideal +realized</i>. Let not the commonplaceness of the words rob us of their +meaning. The fact is far enough from the commonplace. Philosophy must +always tell us that we have no right to expect anywhere a realized +ideal, except in the absolute whole of things. Certainly, we never +find in any <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_201" +id="page_201">{201}</a></span> of the inferior spheres a fully +realized ideal. What does it mean, then, that in this highest of all +spheres, the sphere of the moral and spiritual life, we have the ideal +realized; that our very highest vision is a fact? What is there that +one would add to, what, that one would take away from, the life of +Christ, that it might be more completely than it is the ideal +realized?</p> + +<div class="poem"> + <span class="iq">"But Thee, but Thee, O Sovereign Seer of time,</span> + <span class="i0">But Thee, O poet's Poet, wisdom's tongue,</span> + <span class="i0">But Thee, O man's best Man, O love's best Love,</span> + <span class="i0">O perfect life in perfect labor writ,</span> + <span class="i0">O all men's Comrade, Servant, King or Priest,—</span> + <span class="i0">What <i>if</i> or <i>yet</i>, what mole, what flaw, what lapse,</span> + <span class="i0">What least defect or shadow of defect,</span> + <span class="i0">What rumor, tattled by an enemy,</span> + <span class="i0">Of inference loose, what lack of grace</span> + <span class="i0">Even in torture's grasp, or sleep's, or death's,</span> + <span class="i0">Oh, what amiss may I forgive in Thee,</span> + <span class="i0">Jesus, good Paragon, thou crystal Christ?"</span> +</div> + +<p>4. <i>Christ's Double Uniqueness.</i>—It seems hardly possible to +do justice to the facts now passed in review, without recognizing, at +least, that they point to a double uniqueness on the part of Christ in +his relation to God, reflected in his own language concerning himself +and in the spontaneous confessions of his disciples in all times. He +alone, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_202" +id="page_202">{202}</a></span> in the emphatic sense, is <i>the</i> +Son. The contrasts between Christ and other men, which the simple +facts of the life and consciousness of Christ have compelled us to +make, naturally, then, demand recognition from thought. The +recognition of the facts <i>is</i> the vital matter, but thought can +hardly see them unmoved. How are we to <i>think</i> of Christ? With +clear remembrance, now, that Christian teaching itself insists upon +the kinship of God and men; that absolute barriers, therefore, cannot +anywhere be set up; that a revelation unrelated to all else could be +no revelation; and that Christ himself often pointed out the likeness +between his own life and work and those of his disciples;—still we +may not ignore actual differences, and must honestly strive to do +justice to them in our own conception of Christ. One may not forget +that there is much here that we can hardly hope ever to fathom; and +that into this secret of Christ's relation to the Father theology has +often tried to press with a precision of statement that was quite +beyond its possible knowledge, and that damaged rather than helped the +religious consciousness; but one may try to think in simple, +straightforward fashion <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_203" +id="page_203">{203}</a></span> what the facts mean. Now these actual +and momentous moral and spiritual differences already pointed out +seem, at least, to assert, I say, a genuine double uniqueness in +Christ. Christ's relation to God is absolutely unique, that is, in two +senses: in the absolutely unique purpose of God concerning him; in the +absolutely perfect response of Christ to that purpose. If one chooses +to use the language, he may say, that the first uniqueness is +metaphysical; the second, ethical.<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_101" id="R_101" href="#F_101">[101]</a></span></p> + +<p>First, then, God has a purpose concerning Christ, that he has +concerning no other, for he purposes to make in him his supreme +self-manifestation. This sets him apart from all others. His +transcendent sense of God and sense of mission only correspond to the +absolute uniqueness of this eternal purpose of God concerning him. We +are utterly unable to see that they could be borne by any being that +we know as man. He is the manifested God—"the visible presentation of +the invisible God." This cannot be said, in the same sense, of any +other. Now, our only adequate statement of the inner reality—the +essential meaning—of any being, can be given only in terms of the +purpose which God calls <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_204" +id="page_204">{204}</a></span> that being to fulfil. To see, then, +that God's purpose concerning Christ is absolutely unique, and that +God's purpose is, to make in Christ the completest possible personal +manifestation of himself, is to see that Christ's essential relation +to the Father is absolutely his own, unshared by any other. And, it +may be added, there is no reason why this purpose of God concerning +Christ should not be regarded as an eternal purpose, eternally +realized.</p> + +<p>But Christ is as clearly unique in his simply perfect response to +this purpose of God. Our facts seem to point directly to the +conclusion, that in him there was no moral hindrance to the fullness +of the revelation God would make through him. His life is perfectly +transparent, allowing the full glory of the character of God to shine +through it. The harmony of his will with God's will is complete. If it +be said that this last uniqueness is, after all, only difference in +degree from other men, it must be answered, first, that degree here is +so vast as to be practically kind. This is the perfect of Christ set +over against the varyingly imperfect of all other men. Moreover, to +ask here for difference in kind in any other <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_205" id="page_205">{205}</a></span> sense, is probably to +make an unintelligent and impossible demand; for, in the nature of the +case, the relations involved are spiritual and personal, and there +cannot be, in strictness, in the fulfilment of such relations any real +differences in kind.</p> + +<p>5. <i>The Increasing Sense of Our Kinship with Christ, and of His +Reality.</i>—Side by side with this recognition of the nature of +Christ's uniqueness, there deserves to be set, as another outcome of +the emphasis upon conceiving Christ as a personal revelation of God, +the increasing sense of our kinship with Christ and of his reality. +The connection here is by no means accidental, though it may seem +almost paradoxical. We have plainly come in our day to our clearest +recognition of the divinity of Christ through the sense of his +transcendent character. But revelation in character requires the +reality of his human life. The very route, therefore, by which we have +most certainly reached our sense of Christ's divinity, leads also to +an increasing sense of kinship with Christ, and so of his reality. So +long as we seemed driven to conceive the divinity of Christ in terms +that had no relation and no meaning for human life, just so long must +he seem <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_206" +id="page_206">{206}</a></span> to us to be really moving in another +world and to take on the unreality of that other world quite hidden +from us. But now Christ's life has meaning; we can enter into it and +feel that it is real. With all its transcendence, the life does not +move now simply in the sphere of the mysterious. It is no unreal +drama, no play-struggle,—utterly failing to meet our real moral and +spiritual needs. Least of all, in this supreme work for man, can the +revealing life be only a show. It feels real. It is real. And, with +clear sense of the inevitable inadequacy of the analogy, we still rest +confidently in the conviction that God's relation to Christ may be +best conceived after the analogy of the relation of the Spirit of God +to our spirits; and that, when we try to press beyond that, we are +attempting to rise into that sphere of a supposed supra-personal, for +which we have no possible organ of vision, and where, therefore, we +are thinking not more, but less, truly.<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_102" id="R_102" href="#F_102">[102]</a></span></p> + +<p>With this sense of the reality of the personal, spiritual life of +Christ, there naturally comes home to us the appropriateness and +<i>practicability of his ideals</i>. They are seen to belong to us +more surely, and properly to <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_207" +id="page_207">{207}</a></span> make demands upon us. It is, probably, +not too much to say that, under the influence of the social +consciousness, there has been a definite, growing approach to Christ's +way of thinking, and to his ideal of life. This means a consciousness +increasingly Christian in tone, and, therefore, in turn, increasingly +better able to interpret the teaching and life of Christ, and so to +give promise of a more Christian theology. None of us, probably, are +fully conscious of the more subtle inconsistencies of even our best +theological thinking, when measured by a completely Christian spirit. +At least, with the insistence upon Christ as a personal revealer of a +personal God, it must become more true that the meaning of all terms +for the work of Christ shall be more clearly reasonable, more +consistently ethical, and more completely spiritual; and then the +immediate rooting of Christian theology in the Christian religion can +be seen and felt.</p> + +<h4>III. THE RECOGNITION OF THE PERSONAL IN GOD</h4> + +<p>The sense of the value and sacredness of the person must lead to +the special recognition of the personal not only in man and in <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_208" id="page_208">{208}</a></span> +Christ, but also in God. We have already seen reasons for believing +that the social consciousness is peculiarly bound strongly to +emphasize the personality of God, as in the end absolutely essential +to its own justification. The social consciousness represents an +ethical movement that can live only in the atmosphere of the +personal.</p> + +<p>1. <i>The Steady Carrying through of the Completely Personal in the +Conception of God. Guarding the Conception.</i>—This pressure of the +social consciousness toward an imperative faith in the fully personal +God is most valuable, as offsetting the tendency in many quarters +toward a scientific or even idealistic pantheism or monism that is +quite impersonal. "For," in the language of Professor Howison, "the +very quality of personality is, that a person is a being who +recognizes others as having a reality as unquestionable as his own, +and who thus sees himself as a member of a moral republic, standing to +other persons in an immutable relationship of reciprocal duties and +rights, himself endowed with dignity, and acknowledging the dignity of +all the rest."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_103" id="R_103" +href="#F_103">[103]</a></span> As this is preëminently the spirit of +the social consciousness, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_209" +id="page_209">{209}</a></span> it is plain that we have in the social +consciousness an increasingly powerful motive for guarding the full +personality of God.</p> + +<p>It needs particularly to be noted, that we know no <i>definite</i> +"supra-personal." Pantheism or any impersonal monism is forced, +therefore, when it leaves the personal conception of God, to take a +lower line of development, not a higher. The result is, that it is +obliged to deny the highest attributes to God, and then, as Browning +is fond of arguing, man steps at once into the place of God. Men +cannot permanently remain satisfied with a philosophical view, of +which that is the logical outcome. Certainly, such a view can get no +support from the social consciousness, with its deep conviction of the +supreme value and sacredness of the person.</p> + +<p>Moreover, it is not to be forgotten, in estimating the value of a +cosmic monism, that what the cosmological really means, ethically and +religiously, to a people, must always depend upon their social ideals. +The natural in itself contains no command. For any effective vital +interpretation, therefore, even of its impersonal Absolute, pantheism +is constantly thrown back upon the personal.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_210" +id="page_210">{210}</a></span> Only a clear, steady carrying through +by theology of the completely personal in its conception of God can +ultimately satisfy this sense of the value and sacredness of the +person. Professor Nash does not speak too strongly when he says: "To +fulfil her function the church must develop the doctrine of a Divine +Personality. She has not always been true to it in the past. Too +often, by her sacraments, by her theology, by her theory of +inspiration, she has glorified the impersonal."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_104" id="R_104" +href="#F_104">[104]</a></span></p> + +<p>Now, such an attempt, it is perhaps worth saying once more, is not +to be thought of as a running away from a thorough-going metaphysical +investigation. It rather takes the ground, indicated in the earlier +discussion, of what may be called, in Professor Howison's language, +personal idealism; and holds that spirit, person, <i>is</i> for us the +ultimate metaphysical fact: the one reality to which we have immediate +access; the reality from which all our metaphysical notions are +originally derived; and, in consequence, the one reality which we can +take as the key to the understanding of all else. And it believes that +even essence and substance, the great <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_211" id="page_211">{211}</a></span> words of the old +metaphysics, can be really understood only as they are interpreted in +personal terms. Ultimately, theology would hold, this would mean the +interpretation of the essence of things in terms of the purpose of God +concerning them—what he meant them to be.</p> + +<p>In the attempt, then, clearly and steadily to carry through the +conception of God as completely personal, theology may well guard +carefully certain points. In the first place, theology does not mean +to transfer to God human limitations; rather, it conceives him to be +the only complete personality with perfect self-consciousness and full +freedom, no part of whose being is in any degree foreign to himself. +Nor, in the second place, does it mean to forget that the personal +relations in which God stands to other persons are unique, and that, +in three definite respects: that conviction of the love of God, as of +no other, must underlie, as a great necessary assumption, all our +thinking and all our living; that God is himself the source of the +moral constitution of man, which must thus be regarded as an +expression of the personal will of God, and the personal relation to +God so have universal moral implications such as <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_212" id="page_212">{212}</a></span> no +other personal relation can have; and in that God is such in his +universal love for all, that it is impossible to come into right +personal relation to God, and not at the same time come into right +relation to all moral beings.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_105" +id="R_105" href="#F_105">[105]</a></span></p> + +<p>2. <i>God is Always the Completely Personal God.</i>—If, now, +theology is to do justice to the demands of the social consciousness +for a full recognition of the personal in God, it must see clearly +that God is <i>always</i> the completely personal God. Certain +conclusions, not always admitted, are believed to follow from this +position.</p> + +<p>(1) <i>The Consequent Relation of God to "Eternal Truths."</i>—In +the first place, there can be no sphere of eternal truths, thought of +as either created outright by the will of God, or as existing of +themselves independently of God and only to be recognized by him.</p> + +<p>The difficulty is not merely that at least one of these views would +put God in the same dependent relation to truth as we finite beings, +and thus practically put a God above God. Nor is the difficulty merely +that it is impossible to think the real existence of such a sphere of +eternal truth, since truths <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_213" +id="page_213">{213}</a></span> or laws can be said to exist only in +one of two ways: either as the actual mode of action of reality, or as +the perception and formulation in an observing mind of that mode of +action. And these difficulties are both sufficiently serious.</p> + +<p>But, from our present point of view, the great difficulty is, that +trying to conceive God as either creating or coming to the recognition +of truth, assumes, as Lotze points out, a <i>fragmentary</i> God, a +God for whom truth is <i>not yet</i>. It assumes an action of the will +of God apart from his reason, that is, a God not yet completely +personal, not yet the full God of truth and character. A God for whom +truth and duty are not yet, is certainly no true person. Most, if not +all, of our metaphysical puzzles connected with the relation of God to +what we call eternal truths, seem to me to grow out of this thought of +an essentially fragmentary God.</p> + +<p>We are driven, consequently, to a denial of both the Scotist and +Thomist positions, as ordinarily conceived. It is true neither that +the truth is true and the good is good because God wills it, nor yet +that God wills the true because it is true and the good because it is +good. Both views alike assume <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_214" +id="page_214">{214}</a></span> the possibility of a fragmentary God, a +God for whom at some time truth and goodness were not yet. But God has +<i>always</i> been the completely personal God of truth and love, +never a bare will and never a bare intellect. Hence, neither as an +independent object to be recognized, nor yet as the external product +of his will, can we think of the realm of eternal truth and goodness. +We must rather say, God alone is the eternal being and absolute source +of all, always complete in the perfection of his personality; and, +therefore, what we call the eternal truths are only <i>the eternal +modes of God's actual activity</i>. This alone seems to the writer to +give a thorough-going theistic view, free from +self-contradiction.<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_106" id="R_106" +href="#F_106">[106]</a></span></p> + +<p>(2) <i>Eternal Creation.</i>—But, further, if God is to be thought +as <i>always</i> the completely personal God, we are led, also, +immediately to the doctrine of eternal creation.</p> + +<p>If God has had always a completely personal life, his entire being +must have been always in exercise. Can we really think of such a God +as simply quiescent, and not as always active? Is not his activity +involved in his complete personality? The thought <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_215" id="page_215">{215}</a></span> of +his possible quiescence arises probably out of an unconscious, but +nevertheless unwarranted, transfer to God of our finite separation of +will and act. But God is here, too, no fragmentary God; he has always +been the completely personal God, always acting.</p> + +<p>A second consideration carries us to the same conclusion. +Theologians have felt that they have made a distinct step in advance +in tracing creation to love in God, as, for example, Principal +Fairbairn does. But this gives no real help as an explanation of +creation as <i>beginning in time</i>; for one must at once ask, Was +not the love of God eternal, and if this were the real reason leading +to creation, must not, then, creation be eternal?</p> + +<p>So far as I am able to see, there is nothing to lose and much to +gain in clearness and satisfactoriness of thought in a frank +acceptance of the doctrine of eternal creation. Not, of course, in the +sense of an eternal dualism, in the sense of the thought of an +eternity of matter set over against God, but in the clear sense of the +eternal creative activity of God. And to such a doctrine of eternal +creation, the social consciousness, in its emphasis on the completely +personal, seems to me to lead.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_216" +id="page_216">{216}</a></span> (3) <i>The Unity and Unchangeableness +of God.</i>—And, once more, if God is always the completely personal +God, we shall conceive his own unity not as monotonous self-identity, +but only as consistency of meaning. We shall not, therefore, transfer +to God, pluming ourselves meanwhile upon a highly philosophical view, +the mechanical unchangeableness of a rock; but we shall be rather +concerned with the consistency of his character and the +unchangeableness of his loving will, which would be the very reasons +for his changing, adapting attitude toward his changing children. From +this point of view, too, the sphere of law and the sphere of the +actual, will seem to us, necessarily, to root in the sphere of the +ideal; the <i>is</i> and the <i>must</i>, to rest in the <i>ought</i>; +though we may not hope to trace the connections in detail. In a God, +then, who is a completely harmonious person, never acting in +fragmentary fashion, whose will and whose reason and whose love are +never at cross purposes—only in such a God can the world find its +adequate and unifying source. The world itself has real unity only in +so far as it is the expression of the consistency of meaning of the +purpose of God concerning it.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_217" +id="page_217">{217}</a></span> And this same thought of the +consistency of the meaning of the purpose of God, I have elsewhere +argued,<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_107" id="R_107" +href="#F_107">[107]</a></span> saves us from the necessity of a +self-contradictory conception of the miraculous or supernatural, by +its recognition of the dominant spiritual order. It also enables us to +see, with Professor Nash, if the word personal is given sufficient +breadth, that "the true supernatural is the personal, and wheresoever +the personal is discovered, whether in the life of conscience or the +life of reason, whether in Israel or Greece, there the supernatural is +discovered. Upon this conception of the supernatural as the personal, +apologetics must found the claims of Christianity. The divine and the +human personality stand within 'Nature,' that is, within the total of +being. But they both, the human as well as the divine, transcend the +scope and reach of visible Nature."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_108" id="R_108" href="#F_108">[108]</a></span></p> + +<p>(4) <i>The Limitations of the Conception of Immanence.</i>—Indeed, +it ought to be clearly recognized on all sides by those who believe in +religion at all, that we cannot so exclusively emphasize the immanence +of God, as many are now doing, and have a God at <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_218" id="page_218">{218}</a></span> all, +beyond the finite manifestations. When the matter is so conceived, +there is no real personal God with whom there can be any personal +communion. Religion, thus, in any ordinary sense of it, is by this +process made simply impossible; Positivism is the only logical result, +and Frederic Harrison becomes the one sole, clear-sighted prophet +among us, a lone voice crying in the wilderness. Such an outcome is +possible for any, because, and in so far as, they are not true to the +social consciousness in its demand for the completely personal God, +who, in Martineau's language, is a genuinely "free spirit."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_109" id="R_109" +href="#F_109">[109]</a></span></p> + +<p>3. <i>Deepening the Thought of the Fatherhood of God.</i>—But the +influence of the social consciousness in its deepening sense of the +value and sacredness of the person, of obligation and of love, not +only tends to insist upon the completely personal in the conception of +God, but also tends to deepen our thought of the Fatherhood of +God.</p> + +<p>(1) <i>History no Mere Natural Process.</i>—No mere on-going of an +unfeeling Absolute, whatever name be given it, will ever satisfy the +social consciousness. The new sense of the sorrow and ethical meaning +of the historical <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_219" +id="page_219">{219}</a></span> process demands, in the first place, +that history shall not be regarded as a mere necessitated development, +but a movement in which men effectively coöperate, never more +consciously and clearly than to-day; and secondly, it demands a +<i>God</i> who cares, who loves, who guides. History cannot be a mere +holocaust to God.</p> + +<p>(2) <i>God, the Great Servant.</i>—Rather, as we saw in the fourth +chapter, the social consciousness requires a God whose purpose shall +completely support its own purpose, and so requires us, with +Fairbairn, to put Fatherhood before Sovereignty, not Sovereignty +before Fatherhood, and requires us definitely to conceive God after +Christ, as self-giving ministering love. It is one of the anomalies of +Christian history, that the church has been so slow to cast off a +pagan conception of God, and to come to a truly Christian view. We can +hardly take in Christ's own revelation of God without some sharing in +his sympathy for men. Some experience of our own is needed to unlock +the revelation. And, so, the steady deepening of the social +consciousness, both as to the value of the person and as to the sense +of obligation, has certainly helped us to see that if God is to <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_220" id="page_220">{220}</a></span> be +highest, he must be love, and thus the great servant, with +transcendent obligations, entering really and sympathetically into all +our life.</p> + +<p>(3) <i>No Divine Arbitrariness.</i>—With such a conception of God, +every trace of arbitrariness disappears. Calvinism, however +strenuously insisted upon, means a far different thing for any man who +really feels the pressure of the modern social consciousness, who has +come to some real sense of the value and sacredness of the person, +that is, who really sees God in Christ. The great truth of Calvinism, +that God is the ultimate source of all, was perhaps never more secure +than to-day; but that God, who is the absolute and ultimate source of +all, is the fully personal God, whose will is never divorced from his +reason and love, who knows no such abstraction as a bare and empty +omnipotence without content or direction, but who is himself always +living love. The bane of much so-called Calvinism is in this +supposition of a fragmentary God, like a motion without direction or +rate of speed. Arbitrary decrees are conceivable only from such a +fragmentary God, not yet full and complete in his reality and +personality.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_221" +id="page_221">{221}</a></span> (4) <i>The Passibility of God.</i>—It +would seem, also, that any vital defense of the Fatherhood of God, +required by the social consciousness, involves further the frank +admission of the passibility of God, whether it has the look of an +ancient heresy or not. We must unhesitatingly admit that, without +which God can be no real God to us. "Theology has no falser idea than +that of the impassibility of God. If he is capable of sorrow, he is +capable of suffering, and were he without the capacity for either he +would be without any feeling of the evil of sin or the misery of man. +The very truth that comes by Jesus Christ may be said to be summed up +in the passibility of God."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_110" +id="R_110" href="#F_110">[110]</a></span> With the growing +sensitiveness of the social consciousness, the problem of suffering +and of sin presses increasingly, and itself almost compels the +assertion of the passibility of God. Nothing less can satisfy our +hearts, nor indeed allow us to keep our reverence for God.</p> + +<p>Certainly, with the increasingly clear vision, which the social +consciousness is giving us, of sympathetic, unselfish, definitely +self-sacrificing, loving leadership even among men, we shall not rest +satisfied with less in <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_222" +id="page_222">{222}</a></span> God. We must have a suffering, seeking, +loving God; because our Father, suffering in our sin, bearing as a +burden the sin of each, and not satisfied while one child turns away; +no mere on-looker, but in all our afflictions, himself afflicted. The +cross of Christ, then, is only an honest showing of the actual facts +of God's seeking, suffering love.</p> + +<p>4. <i>As to the Doctrine of a Social Trinity.</i>—One inference +for theology widely drawn from the social consciousness, it ought in +fairness, perhaps, to be said, seems to me unjustified,—the doctrine +of a so-called "Social Trinity." One must question the constant cool +assumption made in these discussions of a social Trinity, that this +view is the only alternative to what is called an "abstract +simplicity." In any case, one would suppose, we must have in God all +the richness and complexity of a complete personal life, freed from +the limitations of finite personality. Something of the much that that +involves we have been trying to point out. Here certainly is no +"abstract simplicity."</p> + +<p>Moreover, the conception of a social Trinity, so far as the writer +can see, carries us inevitably to a tritheism of the most unmistakable +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_223" +id="page_223">{223}</a></span> kind. "Social" involves full +personality. Nothing requires more complete personality than love, +which the view affirms to exist between the persons of the immanent +Trinity, between the distinctions in the very Godhead. The relations +of Christ to God were, of course, distinctly and definitely personal; +but it must not be forgotten that we are not permitted, on any careful +theological view, to transfer these directly to the immanent relations +of the Godhead.</p> + +<p>The distinction drawn by Dr. W. N. Clarke,<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_111" id="R_111" href="#F_111">[111]</a></span> between the +doctrine of the biblical Trinity and the doctrine of the Triunity, I +count of decided value; but after one has made the distinction, one +may doubt the value of the contribution made by the doctrine of the +Triunity. The really immanent relations of the Godhead are necessarily +hidden from us, and are, also, so far as the writer can see, without +ethical or religious significance for us, except in the way of +possible injury through substituting some supposed altogether +mysterious and incomprehensibly sacred, for the well-known and truly +sacred shown in the ethical relations of common life.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_224" +id="page_224">{224}</a></span> The doctrine of the Triunity seems to +have been originally intended to enable the church to hold the +divinity of Christ. If we now get at that and hold that from quite a +different point of view, the older way becomes less essential. We +must, indeed, keep the ancient treasure, but we need not keep it in +the same ancient chest. None of us—not the most orthodox—really find +the <i>reasons</i> for holding the divinity of Christ in the doctrine +of the Triunity. It is interesting to observe how widely separated +from the doctrine of the Triunity are the considerations which really +move men to faith in the divinity of Christ. That doctrine is, at the +very most, only our philosophical supplement intended to bring that, +which on other grounds we have come to believe, into unity with our +thought of God.</p> + +<p>But, at least, we must so conceive the divinity of Christ, as not +to get two or three Gods. And a "Social Trinity" does not seem to me +to avoid that, except in terms. However, therefore, we are to solve +our problem, we are not to take <i>that</i> way out.</p> + +<p>What Dr. Clarke calls the biblical doctrine of the Trinity, on the +other hand, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_225" +id="page_225">{225}</a></span> seems to me to contain the very heart +of Christianity, whatever philosophical theory we put beneath it; and +it became, therefore, as expressed in the baptismal and benediction +formulas, the great daily confession of the church, since it strongly +expresses that of which we have been speaking,—the living love of +God, a life of absolutely self-giving love, of eternal ministry.</p> + +<p>The biblical Trinity is, in truth, what it has sometimes been +called, the trinity of redemption; and, for me, directly emphasizes +the great facts of redemption. Here there are three great facts: +First, the Fatherhood of God, that God is in his very being Father, +Love, self-manifesting as light, self-giving as life, +self-communicating, pouring himself out into the life of his children, +wishing to share his highest life with them, every one. Second, the +concrete, unmistakable revelation of the Father in Christ, revealed in +full ethical perfection, as an actual fact to be known and +experienced; no longer an unknown, hidden, or only partially and +imperfectly revealed God, but a real, living God of character, +counting as a real, appreciable, but fully spiritual fact in the real +world. And, third, the Father revealing himself by his Spirit in <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_226" id="page_226">{226}</a></span> +every <i>individual</i> heart that opens itself to him, in a constant, +intimate, divine association, which yet is never obtrusive, but +reverent of the man's personality, making possible to every man the +ideal conditions of the richest life.</p> + +<p>What metaphysical theory we put under that confession of our full +Christian faith, does not seem to me to be of prime importance. Men +may count it of great importance; but it can hardly be of first +importance, since, at the very most, only the beginnings of such a +theory can be found in the great New Testament confession of +Christ.</p> + +<p>5. <i>Preëminent Reverence for Personality, Characterizing all +God's Relations with Men.</i>—But the very heart of the conviction, +on the part of the social consciousness, of the value and sacredness +of the person, is its <i>reverence for personality</i>; and this +thought has much significance for theology, for, if this judgment of +the social consciousness is justified, it must be regarded as +preëminently characterizing God in all his relations with men.</p> + +<p>(1) <i>Reflected in Christ.</i>—When, in the first place, we turn +to Christ as the supreme revelation of God, we cannot fail to see that +this reverence for the personal marks every <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_227" id="page_227">{227}</a></span> step he takes. It +begins, of course, in the priceless value which Christ gives to each +person, as a child of the living, loving Father.</p> + +<p>And it seems to determine his <i>whole method</i> with his +generation and with his disciples. It is shown in the initial battle +in the temptations, as to the form his work was to take, and as to the +means to be employed. There was here, as we have seen, from the start +an absolute subordination of all unspiritual and unethical methods in +the building of the kingdom. There is to be no over-riding of the free +personality anywhere. He faced successively the temptations to place +his dependence on the mere meeting of men's material needs—the +kingdom by bread; the temptation to place his dependence on that which +appealed most strongly to the oriental mind—the use of wonder-working +power—the kingdom by marvel or ecstasy; the temptation to place his +dependence on force—the kingdom by force. But Christ sees clearly +that God is no mere supplier of bread; that God is no mere +wonder-worker, no mere giver of wonderful experiences; and that God is +not a tyrant to conquer by force. Everywhere, therefore, he sets aside +whatever may override the free personality. He would replace <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_228" id="page_228">{228}</a></span> all +the attractive and seemingly rapid methods of the kingdom by bread, +the kingdom by marvel, and the kingdom by force, with the slow and +tedious and costly but reverent method of the spiritual kingdom by +spiritual means, the kingdom of God by God's way—of a trust freely +won, a humility spontaneously arising, a love gladly given. He can +take no pleasure in any kingdom but one of free persons.</p> + +<p>In the same way, in his dealings with the inner circle of his +disciples, there seems to have been the most scrupulous regard for +their own needed initiative. He apparently makes no clear announcement +of himself as Messiah even to the disciples until late in his public +ministry, and, then, only after they have been brought, through weeks, +if not months, of unusually close personal contact and impression of +his spirit, into their own confession of him. He steadily abjures, +that is, all dogmatism about himself, and leads them along by a purely +spiritual method to a confession of him, that may be truly their own. +There is no piling up of proof-texts from the Old Testament, to show +that he is the Messiah. He seems never to have attempted any proof +with his disciples. Indeed, <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_229" +id="page_229">{229}</a></span> he seems purposely to have chosen the +rather ambiguous title, "the Son of Man," that men might be left free +to come by moral choice to him.</p> + +<p>The surpassingly significant fact, that Christ's chief work in the +establishment of the kingdom of God, as seems to me beyond doubt, was +his personal association with a few men; that, probably, a full third, +perhaps more, of his very brief so-called public ministry was taken up +with a period of definitely sought comparative retirement with the +inner circle of the disciples—all this points to the same recognition +of the fundamental importance in Christ's eyes of such a reverence for +the person. The kingdom of God can be founded only by the full winning +of free persons into his discipleship. The kingdom is first and last a +kingdom of free persons, in Dr. Mulford's language, always a "Republic +of God." Professor Peabody's emphasis on the essential importance of +Christ's individualism, that "Jesus approaches life from within, +through the inspiration of the individual,"<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_112" id="R_112" href="#F_112">[112]</a></span> it need not be +said, goes upon the same assumption of Christ's reverence for the +person.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_230" +id="page_230">{230}</a></span> In his really public ministry the same +spirit appears; for Jesus seems to me here constantly to be standing +with a kind of moral shudder between the spirit of contempt in the +Pharisees and Sadducees, and the outraged personality of the common +people, even of the publicans and sinners. He feels the contempt even +for these least, as a blow in his own face.</p> + +<p>That glimpse which the Revelation gives us of Christ standing and +knocking at the heart's closed door, is a true picture forevermore not +only of the attitude of Christ's earthly life, but of God's eternal +relation to us. Men may over-ride and outrage us, and even think that +they show the more love thereby; God, never. This principle, then, we +may take as absolutely crucial, in our judgment of God's dealings with +us.</p> + +<p>(2) <i>In Creation.</i>—It is fundamental even in creation. The +very fact of the creation of persons implies it. Such a creation can +have no significance, if, in the language already quoted from Howison, +God's "consciousness is void of that recognition and reverence of the +personal initiative of other minds which is at once the sign and the +test of the true person."</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_231" +id="page_231">{231}</a></span> And if love is, for a moment, to be +thought of as the motive of creation, it required for any satisfaction +of it, persons who could freely respond to that love.</p> + +<p>The definite bestowal of the fateful gift of moral freedom, with +the practical certainty of sin—the creation of beings who could +choose against him—shows how deeply planted in the very being of God +is this principle of reverence for the person.</p> + +<p>Here, too, the impossibility of arbitrary divine decrees meets us. +This would be treating a person as a thing, and God himself may not do +that and remain God. If a man cannot see his way to a faith both in +the divine foreknowledge and in the moral initiative of men, +therefore, he must not hesitate to choose even the divine nescience of +the free acts of men, rather than think of God as compelling men. Our +whole moral universe tumbles about our ears, if he who is the source +of all is not in earnest with persons. And yet there is much +theological thinking, of which the common notions of a personal reign +of Christ on the earth may be taken as an example, that practically +looks to a kingdom by compulsion. A kingdom of free spirits cannot be +merely decreed.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_232" +id="page_232">{232}</a></span> (3) <i>In Providence.</i>—And this +same principle of reverence for personality must be felt to be the +guiding motive and key, as well, in the providence and government of +God. God keeps his hands off. He must so act as to call out, not to +suppress, individual initiative.</p> + +<p>This is, perhaps, the deepest reason for a sphere of law, that +there may be a realm in which a person can have his own free +development, uninterfered with by any moral compulsion.</p> + +<p>If, now, this sphere of law is to be any true training ground for +character, as we saw in the third chapter, results must not be +forthwith set aside, the mutual influence of men must hold all along +the line.</p> + +<p>Even in the case of great evils, God does not step in at once to +set things right. Character is an exceedingly costly product. This is +no play-world, either as to mutual influence or as to freedom. God +guards most jealously the freedom and personality of men. He never +forgets that character must be from within. He will not accept, as +Christ would not, a faith compelled by "signs." Hence, too, we are +left to <i>ask</i>, and much is left to depend on our asking. So, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_233" +id="page_233">{233}</a></span> also, God does not remove all +difficulties and give sight in place of faith. He seems even careless, +often, of how things go; for he would not only appeal to the heroic in +us, but he wishes to make it impossible for us to confuse prudence and +virtue in ourselves or others, and so to give us the opportunity and +the joy of a real moral victory, of knowing that we have made a +genuinely unselfish surrender to the right.</p> + +<p>In the light of this deep-lying principle of God's sacred reverence +for the person, one learns to hush his former complaints, and with +full heart to thank God that he lives in a world where righteousness +and happiness do not always seem to fall together, and where, +therefore, he can "serve God for naught." Oh, let us know, that it is +not that God does not care, but that he cares so much—too much to +sacrifice to present comfort the character of the child he loves—too +much to shut him out from his highest opportunity.</p> + +<p>(4) <i>In Our Personal Religious Life.</i>—And the same principle +holds in our personal religious life. The unobtrusiveness of God's +relation to us, of which we often complain, is rather to be taken as +evidence of his <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_234" +id="page_234">{234}</a></span> sacred respect for our own moral +initiative, and proof of his careful adaptation to our moral need. +Wherever a strong personality is in relation to a weaker, the stronger +must maintain a conscientious self-restraint, lest he dominate the +personality of the other, to the other's moral injury and to the +hindering of his individuality. It <i>is</i> possible for a boy to be +injuriously "tied to his mother's apron-strings." Much more is it +necessary that God's relation to us should not be obtrusive. God must +guard our freedom and our individuality. He must even take pains to +hide his hand, as a strong, influential, but wise friend would do. As +we go higher, our life is and must be increasingly one of faith, the +Father's relation less and less obtrusive.<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_113" id="R_113" href="#F_113">[113]</a></span> The times of +vision are given to make us patient in our progress toward the goal. +And after the vision comes often what Rendel Harris calls "the dark +night of faith, when every step has to be taken in absolute dependence +upon God and assurance that the vision was truth and was no lie."<span +class="fnanchor"><a name="R_114" id="R_114" +href="#F_114">[114]</a></span> We need the invisible God for +character.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_235" +id="page_235">{235}</a></span> It is for this reason, no doubt, that +God makes so rare use of overwhelming experiences in the religious +life. He would be chosen with clear and rational self-consciousness, +and so he rarely overpowers. And even in experiences which seem most +overpowering, if the person is really awake to their true ethical and +spiritual import, they will probably be found delicately adapted to +call out the individual's own response. But for most of us such +experiences prove a real temptation, because we allow the passively +emotional to absorb our attention, and so lose the ethical and +spiritual fruit. Where these marvelous experiences have been most +marked, and have plainly given real help, they seem still, usually, to +have been needed because of some false conception of God and the +spiritual world that required a powerful corrective. Here they seem +really to have been granted, as probably the transfiguration of Christ +was to the disciples, as a concession to men's weakness, God +consenting reluctantly to use for the time a lower line of appeal, +because men are unable to rise to the higher appeal.</p> + +<p>We have already seen the danger of the neo-platonic over-estimation +of emotional <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_236" +id="page_236">{236}</a></span> experience, and of sudden and magical +crises in religion; and this danger is especially seen in much that is +said concerning the work of the Holy Spirit. It seems as if it were +simply true, for many earnest and sincere Christians, that the +superstitions, which they had conscientiously put aside elsewhere in +religion, all came back in their thought of the work of the Spirit. +Here their relation to God has ceased to be thought of as a personal +or moral or truly spiritual one; and they are looking more or less +definitely for bodily thrills, for marked and overwhelming emotional +experiences, or for sudden transformations—hardly to be called +transformations of character—in the passive half-magical removal of +temptations altogether. That is, they are looking for moral and +spiritual results from unmoral and unspiritual processes. The exact +point is this: Doubtless we are not narrowly to limit what the +personal influence of the personal Spirit of God may do in +transforming human life—the possibilities probably far transcend what +we think—but we are clearly to see that the relation is personal, +that the influence is spiritual and under strictly ethical conditions, +if we are to escape from simply pagan superstition. Let us see <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_237" id="page_237">{237}</a></span> +that, if God is a Personal Spirit and not an impersonal substance, +then, as Herrmann says, he "communes with us through manifestations of +his inner life, and when he consciously and purposely makes us feel +what his mind is, then we feel himself."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_115" id="R_115" href="#F_115">[115]</a></span></p> + +<p>And, then, let us add, as has been already earlier said, that the +deepening life in the Spirit becomes plainly a deepening personal +friendship and communion with God, with laws—those of a growing +friendship—that we may study and know and obey; and among these laws, +none is of more central importance than this of the reverence for the +person.</p> + +<p>(5) <i>In the Judgment.</i>—And when we turn to God's relation to +us in the judgment, we can be sure, I think, of a further application +of this principle, contrary to common teaching and expectation. We +have no reason to look forward to a time when the secrets of all, or +of any, hearts shall be laid bare to all. In so doing, God would +violate, it seems to me, the principle of his entire dealing with men, +and give the lie to his own revelation in Christ and in history. For +myself, Dr. Clarke's words carry immediate conviction: <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_238" id="page_238">{238}</a></span> "No +man needs to know the secrets of his neighbor, and be able to trace +the justice of God through his neighbor's life, and no man who +respects the sacredness of individuality will desire it. Neither +revelation of his own secrets nor knowledge of another's seems a good +thing to a self-respecting soul."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_116" id="R_116" href="#F_116">[116]</a></span></p> + +<p>Even the judgment itself proceeds, no doubt, in clear recognition +of the free personality. We are "judged by the law of liberty." And we +really choose our own destiny, as Phillips Brooks suggests in one of +his most striking paragraphs. "By this law we shall be judged. How +simple and sublime it makes the judgment day! We stand before the +great white throne and wait our verdict. We watch the closed lips of +the Eternal Judge, and our hearts stand still until those lips shall +open and pronounce our fate, heaven or hell. The lips do not open. The +Judge just lifts his hand and raises from each soul before him every +law of constraint whose pressure has been its education. He lifts the +laws of constraint, and their results are manifest. The real intrinsic +nature of each soul leaps to the surface. Each soul's law of liberty +becomes <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_239" +id="page_239">{239}</a></span> supreme. And each soul, without one +word of commendation or approval, by its own inner tendency, seeks its +own place.... The freeing of souls is the judging of souls. A +liberated nature dictates its own destiny. Could there be a more +solemn judgment seat? Is it not a fearful thing to be judged by the +law of liberty?"<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_117" id="R_117" +href="#F_117">[117]</a></span></p> + +<p>And we may be most certain, that, in any judgment by God, there can +be no thought of "human waste." The man must remain for God, to the +end, a child of God, a person of sacredness and value, to be dealt +with always as capable of character. And it is along just this line +that, independently of exegetical grounds, it seems to me, we are led +to a decisive rejection of the doctrine of annihilation. And I know no +more convincing putting of the matter than this brief but +comprehensive statement of Fairbairn: "If there is any truth in the +Fatherhood, would not annihilation be even more a punishment of God +than of man? The annihilated creature would indeed be gone +forever—good and evil, shame and misery, penalty and pain, would for +him all be ended with his being; but it would not be so with God—out +of <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_240" +id="page_240">{240}</a></span> his memory the name of the man could +never perish, and it would be, as it were, the eternal symbol of a +soul he had made only to find that with it he could do nothing better +than destroy it."<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_118" id="R_118" +href="#F_118">[118]</a></span></p> + +<p>(6) <i>In the Future Life.</i>—Doubtless our difficulties are not +at an end even so; but, at least, our conception of God is saved from +self-contradiction; and the Father is seen as suffering in the sin of +the son, and perpetually desiring and seeking his return, never +satisfied so long as any child of his still refuses his place in the +Father's love. This deep-going principle of reverence for personality, +with which we are dealing, is the finest flower of human ethical +development, and seems completely to shut out the possibility of +compulsion by God at any time in the future life. A person will never +be treated as a thing. The soul that turns to God must be won +voluntarily.</p> + +<p>And if, then, the abstract possibility of endless resistance to God +by men cannot be denied; so neither can the possibility—perhaps one +might even say, the practical probability—be denied that God, in his +infinite love and patience and wisdom, may finally win them all <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_241" id="page_241">{241}</a></span> out +of their resistance. And the eternal hope is at least open; but it is +open, it should be noted, only upon the fulfilment by men of precisely +those moral conditions which hold now in the earthly life, and which +ought now to be obeyed. There will never be an easier way to God. It +is shallow thinking that supposes that, if there be any possibility of +turning to God in the future life, it is of small moment that one +should now put himself where he ought to be. The full results of all +our evil sowing, we must receive. The utmost that on any rational +theory, then, can be held out to men, is the hope that, facing a +greater heritage of evil than now they face, they might return to God +under the same condition of absolute moral surrender, which now holds, +and the fulfilment of which is now far more easily possible to +them.</p> + +<p>And it ought not to be overlooked that, even if the principle of +reverence for personality be much less far-reaching than is here +affirmed, the annihilation of a soul by God could seem justified only +upon the assumption that God foresaw the entire future, and knew that +the soul would never turn to righteousness and God. But if the +doctrine of annihilation <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_242" +id="page_242">{242}</a></span> is to be justified on <i>that</i> +ground, it is to be observed, that the same foreknowledge would have +enabled God to know before creation all the finally incorrigible, if +there were to be any such, and so he need not have called these into +being at all. A goal, therefore, as great if not far greater, than +that offered by the annihilation theory would be, thus, attainable +simply upon the same assumption that must rationally be made by that +theory, and, at the same time, the great objection to that theory—its +violation of personality—would be avoided.</p> + +<p>It seems probable that this very principle of reverence for +personality contains the chief reason why more has not been revealed +to us concerning the future life. Christianity is very far from +satisfying our curiosity here. It gives little more than the +absolutely needed assurance of the fact and worth of the life beyond. +Details are either quite lacking, or given only in broadest symbols. +This reticent silence of revelation seems needed if our individual +initiative is not to be hindered, either by excess of motive on the +one hand, or by the depression of an unappreciated ideal on the other +hand.</p> + +<p>On the one hand, that is, so far as we could <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_243" id="page_243">{243}</a></span> +understand a detailed revelation of the future life, to set it forth +with the realism of the present life would be to interfere with that +unobtrusive relation of God to us, which we have seen to be so +necessary to our highest moral training. We need, in this time of our +training, a certain obscurity of spiritual truth; we need to walk by +faith, not by sight. To be able so obviously to weigh the eternal +realities against the temporal, would hinder rather than help our +growth in loyal, unselfish character.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, if a complete and indubitable revelation of the +future life were given us, no doubt there would be much that could +make but small appeal to us, and might even prove positively +depressing, because we have not yet the experience which would +interpret to us its meaning and open to us its joy. Our earthly life +may furnish us an analogy. The joy of a grown man is often +preëminently in his work, but he would find it difficult to explain to +a child the source of his joy. And if the child were told that there +would come a time in a few years when his chief joy would be found in +work, the prospect would probably not seem to him inviting. The wisest +<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_244" +id="page_244">{244}</a></span> of us may be as little prepared to +enter in detail into the meaning of the future life.</p> + +<p>We may be content to know that the future life is, and is of value +beyond that which we can now understand; and we may be assured that at +least what we have already seen to be the ideal conditions of the +richest life,<span class="fnanchor"><a name="R_119" id="R_119" +href="#F_119">[119]</a></span> as now we understand life, will be +fully met in the future life. We can hardly doubt, therefore, that the +two great centers of the life beyond must be association and work; +though we may not know the precise forms that these will take, nor how +greatly both may deepen beyond our present conception. Steadily +deepening personal relations, rooted in the one absolutely satisfying +relation to God in Christ, there must be; and work, in which one may +lose himself with joy, because it is God's work. This, at least, the +future life will contain. We can hardly go farther with assurance.</p> + +<p>But perhaps even this may suggest, that men may vary much in the +proportionate emphasis laid upon these two great sources of life, and +still alike come into a genuine and rewarding relation to God. That +God has counted individuality among men to be <span class="pagenum"><a +name="page_245" id="page_245">{245}</a></span> of prime significance, +the facts of creation hardly allow us to doubt. Possibly it is only +another application of this same principle of reverence for the +person, in the recognition of that individuality which has its great +joy in work, which is to be found in what Professor George F. Genung +suggestively calls "an apocalypse of Kipling." In Kipling's poem to +Wolcott Balestier, Professor Genung sees "the discovery of a religion, +or assignable and eternally rewardable relation to God, in those whose +inner life is not introspective or self-expressive." Their spiritual +life "serves God with the joy which comes of following and satisfying, +in the sphere of his plans, the eager bent of a conquering will." "It +is the religion of work and of daring." And "it is only in the open +vision of an eternal world that their secular ardor, which was +unconsciously serving God all along, begins to come to the perception +of a transcendent master and to be transformed into an adoration, an +obedience and loyalty, a 'will to serve or to be still as fitteth our +Father's praise.'"</p> + +<p>It is quite possible that through our very failure to enter into +God's own deep reverence for the person, in the recognition of <span +class="pagenum"><a name="page_246" id="page_246">{246}</a></span> +man's divinely given individuality, as well as through failure to +recognize the essential like-mindedness of men, we have been shutting +the door of hope, where God has not shut it, and have limited beyond +warrant the divine mercy. Even in the life of heaven men cannot be all +alike. "Who art thou that judgest the servant of another? to his own +lord he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be made to stand; for the +Lord hath power to make him stand."<span class="fnanchor"><a +name="R_120" id="R_120" href="#F_120">[120]</a></span></p> + +<div class="footnote"> +<a name="F_92" id="F_92" href="#R_92" class="label">[92]</a> +<i>The Limits of Evolution</i>, p. x. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_93" id="F_93" href="#R_93" class="label">[93]</a> +Cf. above, pp. 22, 66, 106. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_94" id="F_94" href="#R_94" class="label">[94]</a> +See especially Bowne, <i>Theory of Thought and Knowledge</i>, pp. +239, 377, 378; James, <i>The Will to Believe</i>, pp. 145 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_95" id="F_95" href="#R_95" class="label">[95]</a> +Cf. above, p. 44 ff +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_96" id="F_96" href="#R_96" class="label">[96]</a> +See King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, pp. 241 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_97" id="F_97" href="#R_97" class="label">[97]</a> +Hastings, <i>Dictionary of the Bible</i>, Vol. II, p. 626. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_98" id="F_98" href="#R_98" class="label">[98]</a> +See King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, Chaps. VI and VII. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_99" id="F_99" href="#R_99" class="label">[99]</a> +I aim here to bring out with some fullness the significance of the +propositions briefly summarized in the <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, +p. 244; and I venture to repeat, also, two quotations from that book, +because they fit so closely into the argument here. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_100" id="F_100" href="#R_100" class="label">[100]</a> +<i>The Place of Christ in Modern Theology</i>, p. 378. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_101" id="F_101" href="#R_101" class="label">[101]</a> +Cf. King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, pp. 232, 233, 248, 249. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_102" id="F_102" href="#R_102" class="label">[102]</a> +See King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, p. 209; and below, p. 209. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_103" id="F_103" href="#R_103" class="label">[103]</a> +<i>The Limits of Evolution</i>, p. 7. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_104" id="F_104" href="#R_104" class="label">[104]</a> +<i>Ethics and Revelation</i>, p. 270. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_105" id="F_105" href="#R_105" class="label">[105]</a> +Cf. King, <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, pp. 205 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_106" id="F_106" href="#R_106" class="label">[106]</a> +Cf. Lotze, <i>The Microcosmus</i>, Vol. II, pp. 690 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_107" id="F_107" href="#R_107" class="label">[107]</a> +See <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, Chapter VI. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_108" id="F_108" href="#R_108" class="label">[108]</a> +<i>Ethics and Revelation</i>, p. 270. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_109" id="F_109" href="#R_109" class="label">[109]</a> +See the fuller statement in the <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, pp. +96-108. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_110" id="F_110" href="#R_110" class="label">[110]</a> +Fairbairn, <i>The Place of Christ in Modern Theology</i>, p. 483. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_111" id="F_111" href="#R_111" class="label">[111]</a> +<i>Outline of Christian Theology</i>, pp. 161, ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_112" id="F_112" href="#R_112" class="label">[112]</a> +<i>Jesus Christ and the Social Question</i>, p. 101. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_113" id="F_113" href="#R_113" class="label">[113]</a> +Cf. Fairbairn, <i>The Place of Christ in Modern Theology</i>, pp. +434, 435. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_114" id="F_114" href="#R_114" class="label">[114]</a> +<i>Union with God</i>, p. 109. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_115" id="F_115" href="#R_115" class="label">[115]</a> +<i>The Communion of the Christian with God</i>, p. 143. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_116" id="F_116" href="#R_116" class="label">[116]</a> +<i>An Outline of Christian Theology</i>, p. 464. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_117" id="F_117" href="#R_117" class="label">[117]</a> +<i>The Candle of the Lord and Other Sermons</i>, p. 197. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_118" id="F_118" href="#R_118" class="label">[118]</a> +<i>The Place of Christ in Modern Theology</i>, p. 467. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_119" id="F_119" href="#R_119" class="label">[119]</a> +See above, pp. 68 ff. +<br /><br /> +<a name="F_120" id="F_120" href="#R_120" class="label">[120]</a> +Romans 14:4. +<br /><br /> +</div> + + +<h3>INDEX</h3> + +<div class="index"> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Abbott, Lyman, reference to, <a href="#page_131">131</a>.</li> + +<li><i>American Journal of Theology, The</i>, reference to, <a +href="#page_86">86</a>.</li> + +<li>Analogy of Organism. See Organism.</li> + +<li>Annihilation, doctrine of, why rejected, 239 ff.</li> + +<li>Arbitrariness, excluded in God, <a href="#page_220">220</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Aristotle, quoted, <a href="#page_26">26</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>his position abandoned by mysticism, <a href="#page_56">56</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Association, personal, in redemption, <a href="#page_149">149</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>in personal relation to God, <a href="#page_159">159</a> ff;</li> + <li>in confessions of faith, <a href="#page_167">167</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Assumption of the book, <a href="#page_3">3</a>.</li> + +<li>Atonement, in the light of social consciousness, <a +href="#page_147">147</a> ff, <a href="#page_150">150</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>the cost of, <a href="#page_150">150</a>;</li> + <li>substitution and propitiation in, <a href="#page_150">150</a> + ff;</li> + <li>analogy of father and child in, <a href="#page_154">154</a> + ff;</li> + <li>blood covenant applied to, <a href="#page_157">157</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Baldwin, J. M., reference to, <a href="#page_12">12</a>.</li> + +<li>Biblical Trinity, <a href="#page_224">224</a>, <a +href="#page_225">225</a>.</li> + +<li>Blood covenant, as applied to doctrine of atonement, <a +href="#page_157">157</a>.</li> + +<li>Böhme, Jacob, referred to, <a href="#page_71">71</a>.</li> + +<li>Bowne, B. P., on causality and purpose, <a href="#page_43">43</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on freedom, <a href="#page_182">182</a>, <a + href="#page_183">183</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Bradley, F. H., on the religious feeling in philosophy, <a +href="#page_129">129</a>.</li> + +<li>Brooks, Phillips, reference to, <a href="#page_28">28</a>, <a +href="#page_146">146</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on the intellectual life of Jesus, <a href="#page_81">81</a>;</li> + <li>on the emotional life of Jesus, <a href="#page_84">84</a>;</li> + <li>on the universal interest of Jesus, <a href="#page_124">124</a>;</li> + <li>on the likeness of men, <a href="#page_126">126</a>;</li> + <li>on judgment according to the law of liberty, <a + href="#page_238">238</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Bruce's <i>The Kingdom of God</i>, reference to, <a +href="#page_52">52</a>.</li> + +<li>Bushnell, H., on impenitence of Jesus, <a +href="#page_193">193</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Calvinism, <a href="#page_220">220</a>.</li> + +<li>Causality and purpose, <a href="#page_42">42</a>, <a +href="#page_43">43</a>.</li> + +<li>Christ, See Jesus.</li> + +<li>Christian, the historically, emphasized by the social +consciousness, <a href="#page_102">102</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Christianity, as contributing to sense of mutual influences, <a +href="#page_13">13</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>sometimes unconscious, <a href="#page_130">130</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Church, the, importance of the doctrine of, <a +href="#page_177">177</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Clarke, W. N., referred to, <a href="#page_116">116</a>, <a +href="#page_224">224</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>quoted, <a href="#page_132">132</a>, <a + href="#page_133">133</a>, <a href="#page_152">152</a>;</li> + <li>on propitiation, <a href="#page_151">151</a>;</li> + <li>on doctrine of Trinity and Triunity, <a + href="#page_223">223</a>;</li> + <li>on revelation of inner life at judgment, <a + href="#page_237">237</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Common qualities and interests, most valuable, <a +href="#page_177">177</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Confessions of faith, Christian fellowship in, <a +href="#page_167">167</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>uniformity in, impossible, <a href="#page_169">169</a> ff;</li> + <li>and undesirable, <a href="#page_171">171</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Corinthians, first, twelfth chapter of, as expression of analogy +of organism, <a href="#page_23">23</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>against false mysticism, <a href="#page_60">60</a>-61, <a + href="#page_83">83</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Cornill, reference to, <a href="#page_64">64</a>.</li> + +<li>Creation, eternal, <a href="#page_214">214</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>reverence for person in, <a href="#page_230">230</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Creed, Christian fellowship in, <a href="#page_167">167</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>uniformity in, impossible, <a href="#page_169">169</a> ff;</li> + <li>and undesirable, <a href="#page_171">171</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Denison, J. H., referred to, <a href="#page_197">197</a>.</li> + +<li>Devotional literature, difficulty in, <a href="#page_84">84</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>referred to, <a href="#page_141">141</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Dewey, John, referred to, <a href="#page_12">12</a>.</li> + +<li>Drummond, H., reference to, <a href="#page_21">21</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on sin, <a href="#page_140">140</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Du Bois, Patterson, on true spirit of fatherhood, <a +href="#page_110">110</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Edwards, Jonathan, referred to, <a href="#page_22">22</a>.</li> + +<li>Election, in Paul, <a href="#page_116">116</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>a choice for service, <a href="#page_116">116</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Emotion, extreme emphasis on, a danger in mysticism, <a +href="#page_71">71</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>cf. <a href="#page_135">135</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Eternal creation, <a href="#page_214">214</a> ff.</li> + +<li>"Eternal truths," God's relation to, <a href="#page_212">212</a> +ff.</li> + +<li>Ethical, the, in religion, <a href="#page_86">86</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>proofs that religion must be, <a href="#page_89">89</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Ethicizing of religion, <a href="#page_89">89</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>involved in relation to Christ, <a href="#page_89">89</a>;</li> + <li>the divine will in ethical command, <a href="#page_90">90</a>;</li> + <li>involved in nature of God's gifts, <a href="#page_91">91</a>;</li> + <li>communion with God through harmony with his will, <a + href="#page_92">92</a>;</li> + <li>the vision of God for the pure in heart, <a + href="#page_92">92</a>;</li> + <li>sharing the life of God, <a href="#page_93">93</a>;</li> + <li>Christ, as satisfying our claims on life, <a + href="#page_94">94</a>;</li> + <li>attraction to Christ, ethically conditioned, <a + href="#page_96">96</a>;</li> + <li>the moral law, a revelation of the love of God, <a + href="#page_98">98</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Ethics and religion, <a href="#page_87">87</a>, <a +href="#page_89">89</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Everett, C. C, criticism of Nietzsche, <a +href="#page_120">120</a>.</li> + +<li><i>Expository Times, The</i>, reference to, <a +href="#page_64">64</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Fairbairn, A. M., his <i>The Place of Christ in Modern +Theology</i>, mentioned, <a href="#page_110">110</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on the Christian consciousness, <a href="#page_112">112</a>;</li> + <li>referred to, <a href="#page_119">119</a>, <a + href="#page_196">196</a>, <a href="#page_215">215</a>, <a + href="#page_234">234</a>;</li> + <li>on sense of sin, <a href="#page_143">143</a>;</li> + <li>on Christ as transcendent, <a href="#page_189">189</a>;</li> + <li>on passibility of God, <a href="#page_221">221</a>;</li> + <li>on annihilation, <a href="#page_239">239</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Faith, necessity of, in life, <a href="#page_43">43</a>, <a +href="#page_44">44</a>.</li> + +<li>Faith in men, increased by sense of likeness, <a +href="#page_128">128</a>.</li> + +<li>Father and child, the analogy of, applied to redemption, <a +href="#page_154">154</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Favorites, none with God, <a href="#page_116">116</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Fellowship, Christian, help of, in coming into kingdom, <a +href="#page_159">159</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>within the kingdom, <a href="#page_162">162</a> ff;</li> + <li>in intercessory prayer, <a href="#page_164">164</a> ff;</li> + <li>in confessions of faith, <a href="#page_167">167</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Fiske, John, reference to, <a href="#page_21">21</a>.</li> + +<li>Freedom, in man, <a href="#page_181">181</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>Bowne on, <a href="#page_182">182</a>, <a + href="#page_183">183</a>;</li> + <li>references on, <a href="#page_182">182</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Fremantle, W. H., reference to, <a href="#page_141">141</a>.</li> + +<li>Friendship, laws of, as holding in religion, <a +href="#page_67">67</a>.</li> + +<li>Future life; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>moral reality of, <a href="#page_132">132</a> ff;</li> + <li>reverence for person in, <a href="#page_240">240</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Galatians, Epistle to, referred to, <a href="#page_83">83</a>.</li> + +<li>Genung, G. F., on "an apocalypse of Kipling," <a +href="#page_245">245</a>.</li> + +<li>Giddings, F. H., reference to, <a href="#page_9">9</a>, <a +href="#page_10">10</a>, <a href="#page_19">19</a>, <a +href="#page_20">20</a>, <a href="#page_62">62</a>, <a +href="#page_117">117</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on the "social mind," <a href="#page_138">138</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>God, immanence of, as related to social consciousness, <a +href="#page_40">40</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>his will, ethical basis of social consciousness, <a + href="#page_44">44</a> ff;</li> + <li>sharing in our life, <a href="#page_48">48</a>;</li> + <li>will of, felt in ethical command, <a href="#page_90">90</a>;</li> + <li>his gifts require ethical attitude to receive them, <a + href="#page_91">91</a>, <a href="#page_92">92</a>;</li> + <li>our sharing his life, <a href="#page_93">93</a>;</li> + <li>we cannot do his will in general, <a href="#page_100">100</a>;</li> + <li>a thoroughly personal conception of, needed, <a + href="#page_207">207</a> ff;</li> + <li>guarding the conception of, <a href="#page_208">208</a> ff, <a + href="#page_211">211</a>;</li> + <li>suprapersonal in, <a href="#page_209">209</a>;</li> + <li>Nash on doctrine of personality of, <a + href="#page_210">210</a>;</li> + <li>always completely personal, <a href="#page_212">212</a> ff;</li> + <li>relation to eternal truths, <a href="#page_212">212</a> ff;</li> + <li>as eternally creating, <a href="#page_214">214</a> ff;</li> + <li>unity and unchangeableness of, <a href="#page_216">216</a> ff;</li> + <li>limiting conception of immanence of, <a href="#page_217">217</a> + ff;</li> + <li>deepening thought of Fatherhood of, <a href="#page_218">218</a> + ff;</li> + <li>as the great servant, <a href="#page_219">219</a>;</li> + <li>no arbitrariness in, <a href="#page_220">220</a>;</li> + <li>passibility of God, <a href="#page_221">221</a>;</li> + <li>trinity in, <a href="#page_222">222</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Grahame, Kenneth, on love, <a href="#page_123">123</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>referred to, <a href="#page_124">124</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Harnack, A., on Christ, <a href="#page_200">200</a>.</li> + +<li>Harris, J. R., quoted, <a href="#page_234">234</a>.</li> + +<li>Hegel, on greatest in art, <a href="#page_119">119</a>.</li> + +<li>Heredity, not to be over-emphasized, <a href="#page_37">37</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>James, on, <a href="#page_37">37</a>, <a + href="#page_38">38</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Herrmann, W., referred to, <a href="#page_22">22</a>, <a +href="#page_70">70</a>, <a href="#page_173">173</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>his definition of mysticism, <a href="#page_56">56</a>, <a + href="#page_57">57</a>;</li> + <li>on pantheistic tendency in mysticism, <a href="#page_58">58</a>, + <a href="#page_74">74</a>;</li> + <li>on our satisfaction in Christ, <a href="#page_94">94</a>;</li> + <li>on the help of the fellowship of the church, <a + href="#page_161">161</a>;</li> + <li>on Christ's rising to his ideals, <a href="#page_194">194</a>;</li> + <li>on Christ's calling out absolute trust, <a + href="#page_199">199</a>;</li> + <li>on personal relation to God, <a href="#page_237">237</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Historical, the, under-estimated by mysticism, <a +href="#page_72">72</a>.</li> + +<li>Historical justification needed by social consciousness, <a +href="#page_59">59</a> ff, <a href="#page_102">102</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Historically, the, Christian, emphasized by the social +consciousness, <a href="#page_102">102</a> ff.</li> + +<li>History, no mere natural process, <a href="#page_218">218</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>God in, <a href="#page_vii">vii</a>, <a + href="#page_219">219</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Holy Spirit, doctrine of, often made superstitious, <a +href="#page_236">236</a>.</li> + +<li>Honesty of the world, double meaning of, <a +href="#page_80">80</a>.</li> + +<li>Hope for men, increased by sense of likeness, <a +href="#page_128">128</a>.</li> + +<li>Hosea, as illustration of inter-play of human and divine +relations, <a href="#page_68">68</a>.</li> + +<li>Howells, W. D., his <i>A Boy's Town</i>, quoted, <a +href="#page_118">118</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>referred to, <a href="#page_123">123</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Howison, G. H., on the person, <a href="#page_180">180</a>, <a +href="#page_208">208</a>, <a href="#page_230">230</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>referred to, <a href="#page_210">210</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Humanity, idea of, from Christianity, <a href="#page_13">13</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Ideal view, requires the facts of the social consciousness, <a +href="#page_29">29</a> ff, <a href="#page_32">32</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Imitation, to be avoided, <a href="#page_172">172</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Immanence of God, as metaphysical ground of facts of social +consciousness, <a href="#page_40">40</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>Lotze on, <a href="#page_40">40</a>, <a + href="#page_41">41</a>;</li> + <li>limitations in conception of, <a href="#page_217">217</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>"Immortability," discussed, <a href="#page_124">124</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Immortality, J. S. Mill on, <a href="#page_50">50</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>Sully on, <a href="#page_50">50</a>;</li> + <li>doctrine of, as affected by sense of likeness of men, <a + href="#page_124">124</a> ff;</li> + <li>references on, <a href="#page_125">125</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Indian mysticism, <a href="#page_74">74</a>.</li> + +<li>Israel, significance of its social struggle, <a +href="#page_63">63</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>ecstasy among its prophets, <a href="#page_64">64</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>James, William, on heredity, <a href="#page_37">37</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on metaphysics, <a href="#page_40">40</a>;</li> + <li>on sense of reality, <a href="#page_72">72</a>;</li> + <li>on nitrous-oxide-gas intoxication, <a href="#page_74">74</a>;</li> + <li>on the world as a confusion, <a href="#page_78">78</a>;</li> + <li>reference to, <a href="#page_79">79</a>, <a + href="#page_122">122</a>, <a href="#page_124">124</a>, <a + href="#page_126">126</a>;</li> + <li>on compensations, <a href="#page_117">117</a>;</li> + <li>on varied ideals, <a href="#page_128">128</a>;</li> + <li>on catching faith and courage, <a href="#page_147">147</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Jesus, Brooks on his intellectual life, <a href="#page_81">81</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on his emotional life, <a href="#page_84">84</a>;</li> + <li>relation to, necessarily ethical, <a href="#page_89">89</a>, <a + href="#page_94">94</a>, <a href="#page_96">96</a>;</li> + <li>satisfies our highest claims on life, <a + href="#page_94">94</a>;</li> + <li>his social emphases, <a href="#page_111">111</a> ff;</li> + <li>Brooks on his interest in the uninteresting, <a + href="#page_124">124</a>;</li> + <li>the great Christian confession, <a href="#page_174">174</a> ff;</li> + <li>loyalty to, best assurance for doctrine, <a + href="#page_175">175</a>;</li> + <li>the personal in, <a href="#page_184">184</a> ff;</li> + <li>a personal revelation of God, <a href="#page_184">184</a> ff;</li> + <li>the moral and spiritual in his supremacy, <a + href="#page_185">185</a> ff;</li> + <li>grounds of his supremacy, <a href="#page_188">188</a> ff;</li> + <li>among founders of religion, <a href="#page_189">189</a> ff;</li> + <li>his sinlessness, <a href="#page_192">192</a> ff;</li> + <li>his impenitence, <a href="#page_193">193</a>;</li> + <li>rises to highest ideals, <a href="#page_194">194</a> ff;</li> + <li>shows character of God, <a href="#page_195">195</a> ff;</li> + <li>consciously able to redeem all men, <a + href="#page_196">196</a>;</li> + <li>transcendent God-consciousness and sense of mission, <a + href="#page_197">197</a> ff;</li> + <li>calls out absolute trust, <a href="#page_198">198</a> ff;</li> + <li>in him God certainly finds us, <a href="#page_199">199</a> ff;</li> + <li>the ideal realized, <a href="#page_200">200</a> ff;</li> + <li>his double uniqueness, <a href="#page_201">201</a> ff;</li> + <li>sense of kinship with, and reality of, <a + href="#page_205">205</a> ff;</li> + <li>divinity of, as related to Trinity, <a + href="#page_224">224</a>;</li> + <li>reverence for person in, <a href="#page_226">226</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Judgment, according to light, <a href="#page_132">132</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>how God's can be favorable, <a href="#page_153">153</a> ff;</li> + <li>reverence for person in, <a href="#page_237">237</a> ff;</li> + <li>according to law of liberty, <a href="#page_238">238</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Kaftan, J., referred to, <a href="#page_86">86</a>.</li> + +<li>Keim, quoted, <a href="#page_52">52</a>.</li> + +<li>King, references to his <i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, <a +href="#page_16">16</a>, <a href="#page_20">20</a>, <a +href="#page_23">23</a>, <a href="#page_43">43</a>, <a +href="#page_67">67</a>, <a href="#page_185">185</a>, <a +href="#page_187">187</a>, <a href="#page_188">188</a>, <a +href="#page_203">203</a>, <a href="#page_205">205</a>, <a +href="#page_212">212</a>, <a href="#page_13">13</a>, <a +href="#page_218">218</a>.</li> + +<li>Kipling, R., on the value of the common, <a href="#page_119">119</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>G. F. Genung on, <a href="#page_245">245</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Lanier, S., quoted, on Christ, <a href="#page_201">201</a>.</li> + +<li>Leibnitz, referred to, <a href="#page_172">172</a>.</li> + +<li>Life, the richest, ideal conditions of, <a href="#page_68">68</a> +ff.</li> + +<li>Like-mindedness of men, <a href="#page_9">9</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>an element of social consciousness, <a href="#page_9">9</a> ff, + <a href="#page_47">47</a>;</li> + <li>influence on theology, <a href="#page_115">115</a> ff;</li> + <li>summary on, <a href="#page_134">134</a>;</li> + <li>seen under diverse forms, <a href="#page_121">121</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Lotze, reference to, <a href="#page_13">13</a>, <a +href="#page_25">25</a>, <a href="#page_31">31</a>, <a +href="#page_42">42</a>, <a href="#page_213">213</a>, <a +href="#page_214">214</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on passion for construing everything, <a href="#page_25">25</a>, + <a href="#page_26">26</a>;</li> + <li>on immanence of God, <a href="#page_40">40</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Love, sense of, <a href="#page_20">20</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>element in social consciousness, <a href="#page_20">20</a>, <a + href="#page_51">51</a>;</li> + <li>as motive in creation, <a href="#page_215">215</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Man, the personal in, <a href="#page_180">180</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>separateness from God, <a href="#page_180">180</a> ff;</li> + <li>freedom in, <a href="#page_181">181</a> ff; a child of God, <a + href="#page_183">183</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Matheson, George, on sacrifice, <a href="#page_49">49</a>.</li> + +<li>McConnell, S. D., objection to one part in his argument as to +immortality, <a href="#page_124">124</a> ff.</li> + +<li>McCurdy, on the significance of the social struggle in Israel, <a +href="#page_63">63</a>.</li> + +<li>Metaphysical, not to be emphasized, in conception of Christ, <a +href="#page_185">185</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>how to be thought, as to Christ, <a href="#page_203">203</a>, <a + href="#page_204">204</a>;</li> + <li>in doctrine of Trinity, <a href="#page_226">226</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Mill, J. S., on immortality, <a href="#page_50">50</a>.</li> + +<li>Moral world, prerequisites of, <a href="#page_30">30</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>sphere of law, <a href="#page_30">30</a>;</li> + <li>ethical freedom, <a href="#page_30">30</a>;</li> + <li>some power of accomplishment, <a href="#page_31">31</a>;</li> + <li>members one of another, <a href="#page_32">32</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Mistiness in mysticism, <a href="#page_73">73</a>.</li> + +<li>Moral initiative in men, <a href="#page_181">181</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Moral law, a revelation of the love of God, <a +href="#page_98">98</a>.</li> + +<li>Mulford, E., referred to, <a href="#page_229">229</a>.</li> + +<li>Münsterberg, H., referred to, <a href="#page_79">79</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>reference to his <i>Psychology and Life</i>, <a + href="#page_79">79</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Mutual influence of men, <a href="#page_11">11</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>contributing lines of thought, <a href="#page_11">11</a> ff;</li> + <li>threefold form of the conviction, <a href="#page_13">13</a> + ff;</li> + <li>as element of social consciousness, <a href="#page_11">11</a> + ff, <a href="#page_50">50</a>;</li> + <li>influence upon theological doctrine, <a href="#page_136">136</a> + ff;</li> + <li>for good, <a href="#page_144">144</a> ff;</li> + <li>in attainment of character, <a href="#page_145">145</a> ff;</li> + <li>in personal relation to God, <a href="#page_160">160</a> ff;</li> + <li>in confession of faith, <a href="#page_167">167</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Mystical, the falsely, opposition of the social consciousness to, +<a href="#page_55">55</a> ff, <a href="#page_57">57</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>Nash's definition of, <a href="#page_55">55</a>, <a + href="#page_56">56</a>;</li> + <li>Herrmann's definition of, <a href="#page_56">56</a>, <a + href="#page_57">57</a>;</li> + <li>unethical, <a href="#page_58">58</a>;</li> + <li>no real personal God, <a href="#page_58">58</a>;</li> + <li>belittles personal in man, <a href="#page_59">59</a>;</li> + <li>Paul's rejection of, <a href="#page_60">60</a>, <a + href="#page_61">61</a>;</li> + <li>leaves historically Christian, <a href="#page_62">62</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Mystical, the truly, emphasized by the social consciousness, <a +href="#page_66">66</a> ff, <a href="#page_70">70</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>requires laws of a deepening friendship, <a + href="#page_67">67</a>;</li> + <li>requires ideal conditions of the richest life, <a + href="#page_68">68</a>;</li> + <li>protest in favor of whole man, <a href="#page_78">78</a> ff;</li> + <li>its self-controlled recognition of emotion, <a + href="#page_82">82</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Mysticism, its relation to the social consciousness, <a +href="#page_55">55</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>false, <a href="#page_55">55</a> ff;</li> + <li>true, <a href="#page_66">66</a> ff, <a href="#page_70">70</a> + ff;</li> + <li>justifiable and unjustifiable elements in, <a + href="#page_71">71</a> ff;</li> + <li>its dangers: + <ul class="IX"> + <li>emotionalism, <a href="#page_71">71</a>;</li> + <li>subjectivism, <a href="#page_72">72</a>;</li> + <li>under-estimating historical, <a href="#page_72">72</a>;</li> + <li>mistiness, <a href="#page_73">73</a>;</li> + <li>pantheism, <a href="#page_73">73</a> ff;</li> + <li>symbolism, <a href="#page_76">76</a>.</li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>justifiable elements in, summed up, <a href="#page_77">77</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Nash, H. S., on ethical basis of social consciousness in will of +God, <a href="#page_45">45</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>his definition of the mystical, <a href="#page_55">55</a>, <a + href="#page_56">56</a>;</li> + <li>referred to, <a href="#page_70">70</a>;</li> + <li>on doctrine of divine personality, <a + href="#page_210">210</a>;</li> + <li>on the supernatural, <a href="#page_217">217</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Neo-Darwinian school, referred to, <a href="#page_37">37</a>.</li> + +<li>Neo-Platonic mysticism, <a href="#page_55">55</a> ff, <a +href="#page_74">74</a>.</li> + +<li><i>New World, The</i>, reference to, <a href="#page_12">12</a>, <a +href="#page_120">120</a>.</li> + +<li>Neitzsche, criticism of, by Everett, <a +href="#page_120">120</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Obligation, sense of, <a href="#page_18">18</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>element in social consciousness, <a href="#page_18">18</a>, <a + href="#page_51">51</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Organism, analogy of, <a href="#page_23">23</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>value of, <a href="#page_23">23</a>;</li> + <li>classical expression in I Cor. <a href="#page_12">12</a>;</li> + <li>inadequacy of, for social consciousness, <a + href="#page_24">24</a> ff: + <ul class="IX"> + <li>comes from the sub-personal world, <a href="#page_24">24</a>;</li> + <li>access to reality only through ourselves, <a + href="#page_24">24</a>;</li> + <li>mistaken passion for construing everything, <a + href="#page_25">25</a>;</li> + <li>tested by definition of social consciousness, <a + href="#page_26">26</a> ff.</li> + </ul> + </li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>Orr's <i>The Christian View of God and the World</i>, reference +to, <a href="#page_51">51</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Pantheism, tendency to, in mysticism, <a href="#page_58">58</a>, +<a href="#page_74">74</a>.</li> + +<li>Paul, his rejection of the falsely mystical, <a +href="#page_60">60</a>, <a href="#page_61">61</a>, <a +href="#page_83">83</a>.</li> + +<li>Paulsen, on key to reality, <a href="#page_25">25</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>reference to, <a href="#page_30">30</a>, <a + href="#page_129">129</a>;</li> + <li>on necessity of faith, <a href="#page_46">46</a>, <a + href="#page_47">47</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Peabody, F. G., referred to, <a href="#page_65">65</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>on the social principles of Jesus, <a + href="#page_111">111</a>;</li> + <li>on Christ's individualism, <a href="#page_229">229</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Person, value of, <a href="#page_16">16</a> ff, <a +href="#page_50">50</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>influence of sense of value of, on theology, <a + href="#page_179">179</a> ff;</li> + <li>reverence for, characterizing all God's relation to men, <a + href="#page_226">226</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Personal, the, recognition of, <a href="#page_179">179</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>recognition of, in man, <a href="#page_180">180</a> ff;</li> + <li>recognition of, in Christ, <a href="#page_184">184</a> ff;</li> + <li>recognition of, in God, <a href="#page_207">207</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>"Personal idealism," <a href="#page_180">180</a>, <a +href="#page_181">181</a>, <a href="#page_210">210</a>.</li> + +<li>Personal relation, in religion, emphasized by social +consciousness, <a href="#page_66">66</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>leads to the truly mystical, <a href="#page_70">70</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Philo, as representative of mysticism, <a href="#page_55">55</a>.</li> + +<li><i>Philosophical Review, The</i>, reference to, <a +href="#page_40">40</a>.</li> + +<li>Philosophy, as contributing to sense of mutual influence, <a +href="#page_12">12</a>.</li> + +<li>Plato, his position abandoned by mysticism, <a +href="#page_56">56</a>.</li> + +<li>Plotinus, as representative of mysticism, <a +href="#page_55">55</a>.</li> + +<li>Prophets, the, their standpoint abandoned by Philo, <a +href="#page_55">55</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>their sense of the significance of the social struggle in + Israel, <a href="#page_63">63</a>;</li> + <li>ecstasy in, <a href="#page_64">64</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Propitiation, ethical meaning of, <a href="#page_150">150</a> ff, +<a href="#page_156">156</a>, <a href="#page_158">158</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Providence, reverence for person in, <a href="#page_232">232</a> +ff.</li> + +<li>Psychology, as contributing to sense of mutual influence, <a +href="#page_12">12</a>.</li> + +<li>Purpose and causality, <a href="#page_42">42</a>, <a +href="#page_43">43</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Race-connection, not prime cause of unity of men, <a +href="#page_35">35</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Race, real unity of, <a href="#page_136">136</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>its solidarity, how conceived, <a href="#page_16">16</a>, <a + href="#page_35">35</a>, <a href="#page_30">30</a>, <a + href="#page_137">137</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Ranke, on Christ, <a href="#page_192">192</a>.</li> + +<li>Rational, two senses of, <a href="#page_80">80</a>.</li> + +<li><i>Reconstruction in Theology</i>, references to, <a +href="#page_16">16</a>, <a href="#page_20">20</a>, <a +href="#page_23">23</a>, <a href="#page_43">43</a>, <a +href="#page_67">67</a>, <a href="#page_185">185</a>, <a +href="#page_187">187</a>, <a href="#page_188">188</a>, <a +href="#page_203">203</a>, <a href="#page_205">205</a>, <a +href="#page_212">212</a>, <a href="#page_217">217</a>, <a +href="#page_218">218</a>.</li> + +<li>Redemption, as viewed from point of view of mutual influence for +good, <a href="#page_147">147</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>the cost of, <a href="#page_150">150</a>;</li> + <li>substitution and propitiation in, <a href="#page_150">150</a> + ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Religion, and theology, <a href="#page_6">6</a>, <a +href="#page_113">113</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>influence of the social consciousness upon, <a + href="#page_53">53</a> ff, <a href="#page_70">70</a> ff;</li> + <li>the personal relation in, emphasized by the social + consciousness, <a href="#page_66">66</a> ff;</li> + <li>its thorough ethicizing demanded by social consciousness, <a + href="#page_86">86</a> ff; and ethics, <a + href="#page_87">87</a>;</li> + <li>a supreme factor in life, <a href="#page_189">189</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Reverence for the person characterizing all God's relations to +men, <a href="#page_226">226</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>reflected in Christ, <a href="#page_226">226</a> ff;</li> + <li>in creation, <a href="#page_230">230</a> ff;</li> + <li>in providence, <a href="#page_232">232</a> ff;</li> + <li>in the personal religious life, <a href="#page_233">233</a> + ff;</li> + <li>in the judgment, <a href="#page_237">237</a> ff;</li> + <li>in the future life, <a href="#page_240">240</a> ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Ritschl, A., referred to, <a href="#page_137">137</a>.</li> + +<li>Royce, Josiah, reference to, <a href="#page_12">12</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Sabatier, A., reference to, <a href="#page_171">171</a>.</li> + +<li>Sanday, W., reference to, <a href="#page_187">187</a>.</li> + +<li>Schiller, F. C, S., reference to, <a href="#page_40">40</a>.</li> + +<li>Science, as contributing to sense of mutual influence, <a +href="#page_11">11</a>.</li> + +<li>Scotist position as to God, <a href="#page_213">213</a>.</li> + +<li>Separateness from God, meaning of, <a href="#page_180">180</a> +ff.</li> + +<li>Sin, sense of, deepened by social consciousness, <a +href="#page_139">139</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>Drummond on, <a href="#page_140">140</a>;</li> + <li>lack of sense of, among Greeks, <a href="#page_140">140</a>;</li> + <li>when most feared, <a href="#page_143">143</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Smith, G. A., reference to, <a href="#page_64">64</a>.</li> + +<li>Social consciousness, definition, <a href="#page_9">9</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>elements in, <a href="#page_9">9</a> ff;</li> + <li>meaning of, for theology, <a href="#page_5">5</a> ff;</li> + <li>analogy of organism, inadequate for, <a href="#page_24">24</a> + ff;</li> + <li>analogy, tested, <a href="#page_26">26</a> ff;</li> + <li>necessity of its facts for ideal interests, <a + href="#page_29">29</a> ff;</li> + <li>the question, <a href="#page_29">29</a>;</li> + <li>else, no moral world, <a href="#page_30">30</a> ff, <a + href="#page_32">32</a> ff;</li> + <li>ultimate explanation and ground of, <a href="#page_35">35</a> + ff;</li> + <li>metaphysical ground, <a href="#page_35">35</a> ff: + <ul class="IX"> + <li>not due to physical race-connection, <a href="#page_35">35</a> + ff;</li> + <li>nor primarily to heredity, <a href="#page_37">37</a> ff;</li> + <li>nor to mystical solidarity, <a href="#page_37">37</a> ff;</li> + <li>but to immanence of God, <a href="#page_40">40</a> ff;</li> + <li>ethical basis, <a href="#page_44">44</a> ff;</li> + <li>supporting will of God, <a href="#page_44">44</a>;</li> + <li>Nash on, <a href="#page_45">45</a>;</li> + <li>Paulsen on, <a href="#page_46">46</a>;</li> + <li>God's sharing in our life, <a href="#page_48">48</a> ff;</li> + <li>consequent transfiguration of, <a href="#page_49">49</a> ff.</li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>its influence upon religion, <a href="#page_53">53</a> ff;</li> + <li>opposed to the falsely mystical, <a href="#page_57">57</a> ff;</li> + <li>emphasizes personal relation in religion, and so the truly + mystical, <a href="#page_66">66</a> ff;</li> + <li>demands the ethicizing of religion, <a href="#page_86">86</a> + ff;</li> + <li>needs historical justification, <a href="#page_102">102</a> ff;</li> + <li>its influence upon theological doctrine, <a + href="#page_105">105</a> ff: + <ul class="IX"> + <li>general results, <a href="#page_105">105</a> ff;</li> + <li>influence of like-mindedness of men, <a + href="#page_115">115</a> ff;</li> + <li>of mutual influence of men, <a href="#page_136">136</a> ff;</li> + <li>of sense of value of person, <a href="#page_179">179</a> ff.</li> + </ul> + </li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>"Social mind," real meaning of, <a href="#page_138">138</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>Giddings on, <a href="#page_138">138</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> + +<li>"Social Trinity," <a href="#page_222">222</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Solidarity, a mystical, not to be pressed, <a +href="#page_39">39</a>.</li> + +<li>Solidarity of race, often falsely conceived, <a +href="#page_16">16</a>, <a href="#page_35">35</a>, <a +href="#page_39">39</a>, <a href="#page_137">137</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Stevenson, R. L., on the poetical and ideal in men, <a +href="#page_122">122</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>referred to, <a href="#page_123">123</a>, <a + href="#page_124">124</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Subjectivism, tendency to, in mysticism, <a +href="#page_72">72</a>.</li> + +<li>Substitution, ethical meaning of, <a href="#page_150">150</a> ff, +<a href="#page_158">158</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Sully, J., on immortality, <a href="#page_50">50</a>.</li> + +<li>Supra-personal, the, in God, <a href="#page_209">209</a>.</li> + +<li>Symbolism, strong tendency to, in mysticism, <a +href="#page_76">76</a>.</li> + +<li>Sympathy with men, increased by sense of likeness, <a +href="#page_127">127</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Tennyson, his self-hypnotism, <a href="#page_74">74</a>.</li> + +<li>Theme of the book, <a href="#page_1">1</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Theologian, the, an interpreter, <a href="#page_5">5</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>a believer in the supremacy of spiritual interests, <a + href="#page_6">6</a>;</li> + <li>assumes the fact of religion, <a href="#page_6">6</a>;</li> + <li>assumes a personal God, <a href="#page_7">7</a>;</li> + <li>takes point of view of Christ, <a href="#page_7">7</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Theologian's, the, point of view, <a href="#page_5">5</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Theology, and religion, <a href="#page_6">6</a>, <a +href="#page_113">113</a>; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>in personal terms, <a href="#page_106">106</a> ff;</li> + <li>Fatherhood of God, determining principle in, <a + href="#page_109">109</a>;</li> + <li>as influenced by social consciousness, <a + href="#page_105">105</a> ff;</li> + <li>general results in, <a href="#page_105">105</a> ff;</li> + <li>influence of likeness of men on, <a href="#page_115">115</a> + ff;</li> + <li>influence of mutual influence of men on, <a + href="#page_136">136</a> ff;</li> + <li>influence of value of person on, <a href="#page_179">179</a> + ff.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>Thomist position as to God, <a href="#page_223">223</a>.</li> + +<li>Trinity, doctrine of, <a href="#page_222">222</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>biblical, <a href="#page_224">224</a>, <a + href="#page_225">225</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +<li>"Trinity, Social," <a href="#page_222">222</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Tritheism, involved in a real social trinity, <a +href="#page_222">222</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Triunity of God, doctrine of, <a href="#page_223">223</a> ff.</li> + +<li>"Truths, eternal," God's relation to, <a href="#page_212">212</a> +ff.</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Unchangeableness of God, <a href="#page_216">216</a> ff.</li> + +<li>Unconscious Christianity, <a href="#page_130">130</a>.</li> + +<li>Uniqueness, a double, in Christ, <a href="#page_201">201</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>metaphysical, <a href="#page_203">203</a>, <a + href="#page_204">204</a>;</li> + <li>ethical, <a href="#page_204">204</a>, <a + href="#page_205">205</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li></ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Value and sacredness of person, <a href="#page_16">16</a> ff; + <ul class="IX"> + <li>sense of, element in social consciousness, <a + href="#page_16">16</a>, <a href="#page_50">50</a>.</li> + </ul> +</li> +</ul> + +<ul class="IX"> +<li>Weismann, referred to, <a href="#page_37">37</a>.</li> +</ul> +</div> + +<div class="tnote"> +<p class="nodent">Transcriber's Note:<br /> +Blackletter in title rendered in italic.<br /> +Page 182, "GOd" changed to "God".<br /> +Inconsistent hyphenation retained.<br /> +Apparent printer's punctuation errors corrected.</p> +</div> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Theology and the Social Consciousness, by +Henry Churchill King + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THEOLOGY AND THE SOCIAL *** + +***** This file should be named 37531-h.htm or 37531-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/5/3/37531/ + +Produced by Barbara Tozier, Chris Pinfield, Bill Tozier +and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at +http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> |