summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/3742.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '3742.txt')
-rw-r--r--3742.txt9798
1 files changed, 9798 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3742.txt b/3742.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9efb24b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3742.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,9798 @@
+Project Gutenberg's The Writings of Thomas Paine, Volume II, by Thomas Paine
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Writings of Thomas Paine, Volume II
+
+Author: Thomas Paine
+
+Release Date: February, 2003 [Etext #3742]
+Posting Date: February 7, 2010
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THOMAS PAINE ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Norman M. Wolcott
+
+
+
+
+
+THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS PAINE, VOLUME II.
+
+By Thomas Paine
+
+Collected And Edited By
+
+Moncure Daniel Conway
+
+
+1779 - 1792
+
+
+
+[Redactor's Note: Reprinted from the "The Writings of Thomas Paine
+Volume I" (1894 - 1896). The author's notes are preceded by a "*". A
+Table of Contents has been added for each part for the convenience of
+the reader which is not included in the printed edition. Notes are at
+the end of Part II. ]
+
+
+
+
+ TABLE OF CONTENTS
+
+ XIII The Rights of Man
+
+ PART THE FIRST
+ BEING AN ANSWER TO MR. BURKE'S ATTACK ON THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
+
+ * Editor's Introduction
+ * Dedication to George Washington
+ * Preface to the English Edition
+ * Preface to the French Edition
+ * Rights of Man
+ * Miscellaneous Chapter
+ * Conclusion
+
+ XIV The Rights of Man
+
+ PART THE SECOND
+ COMBINING PRINCIPLE AND PRACTICE
+
+ * French Translator's Preface
+ * Dedication to M. de la Fayette
+ * Preface
+ * Introduction
+ * Chapter I Of Society and Civilisation
+ * Chapter II Of the Origin of the Present Old Governments
+ * Chapter III Of the Old and New Systems of Government
+ * Chapter IV Of Constitutions
+ * Chapter V Ways and Means of Improving the Condition of Europe,
+ Interspersed with Miscellaneous Observations
+
+ * Appendix
+ * Notes
+
+
+
+
+XIII. RIGHTS OF MAN.
+
+
+
+
+EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION.
+
+
+WHEN Thomas Paine sailed from America for France, in April, 1787, he was
+perhaps as happy a man as any in the world. His most intimate friend,
+Jefferson, was Minister at Paris, and his friend Lafayette was the idol
+of France. His fame had preceded him, and he at once became, in Paris,
+the centre of the same circle of savants and philosophers that had
+surrounded Franklin. His main reason for proceeding at once to Paris was
+that he might submit to the Academy of Sciences his invention of an iron
+bridge, and with its favorable verdict he came to England, in September.
+He at once went to his aged mother at Thetford, leaving with a publisher
+(Ridgway), his "Prospects on the Rubicon." He next made arrangements to
+patent his bridge, and to construct at Rotherham the large model of it
+exhibited on Paddington Green, London. He was welcomed in England by
+leading statesmen, such as Lansdowne and Fox, and above all by Edmund
+Burke, who for some time had him as a guest at Beaconsfield, and drove
+him about in various parts of the country. He had not the slightest
+revolutionary purpose, either as regarded England or France. Towards
+Louis XVI. he felt only gratitude for the services he had rendered
+America, and towards George III. he felt no animosity whatever. His four
+months' sojourn in Paris had convinced him that there was approaching a
+reform of that country after the American model, except that the Crown
+would be preserved, a compromise he approved, provided the throne should
+not be hereditary. Events in France travelled more swiftly than he had
+anticipated, and Paine was summoned by Lafayette, Condorcet, and others,
+as an adviser in the formation of a new constitution.
+
+Such was the situation immediately preceding the political and literary
+duel between Paine and Burke, which in the event turned out a tremendous
+war between Royalism and Republicanism in Europe. Paine was, both in
+France and in England, the inspirer of moderate counsels. Samuel Rogers
+relates that in early life he dined at a friend's house in London
+with Thomas Paine, when one of the toasts given was the "memory of
+Joshua,"--in allusion to the Hebrew leader's conquest of the kings of
+Canaan, and execution of them. Paine observed that he would not treat
+kings like Joshua. "I 'm of the Scotch parson's opinion," he said,
+"when he prayed against Louis XIV.--`Lord, shake him over the mouth of
+hell, but don't let him drop!'" Paine then gave as his toast, "The
+Republic of the World,"--which Samuel Rogers, aged twenty-nine, noted
+as a sublime idea. This was Paine's faith and hope, and with it he
+confronted the revolutionary storms which presently burst over France
+and England.
+
+Until Burke's arraignment of France in his parliamentary speech
+(February 9, 1790), Paine had no doubt whatever that he would sympathize
+with the movement in France, and wrote to him from that country as
+if conveying glad tidings. Burke's "Reflections on the Revolution in
+France" appeared November 1, 1790, and Paine at once set himself to
+answer it. He was then staying at the Angel Inn, Islington. The inn
+has been twice rebuilt since that time, and from its contents there is
+preserved only a small image, which perhaps was meant to represent
+"Liberty,"--possibly brought from Paris by Paine as an ornament for his
+study. From the Angel he removed to a house in Harding Street, Fetter
+Lane. Rickman says Part First of "Rights of Man" was finished at
+Versailles, but probably this has reference to the preface only, as I
+cannot find Paine in France that year until April 8. The book had been
+printed by Johnson, in time for the opening of Parliament, in February;
+but this publisher became frightened after a few copies were out (there
+is one in the British Museum), and the work was transferred to J. S.
+Jordan, 166 Fleet Street, with a preface sent from Paris (not contained
+in Johnson's edition, nor in the American editions). The pamphlet,
+though sold at the same price as Burke's, three shillings, had a vast
+circulation, and Paine gave the proceeds to the Constitutional Societies
+which sprang up under his teachings in various parts of the country.
+
+Soon after appeared Burke's "Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs." In
+this Burke quoted a good deal from "Rights of Man," but replied to it
+only with exclamation points, saying that the only answer such ideas
+merited was "criminal justice." Paine's Part Second followed, published
+February 17, 1792. In Part First Paine had mentioned a rumor that Burke
+was a masked pensioner (a charge that will be noticed in connection with
+its detailed statement in a further publication); and as Burke had
+been formerly arraigned in Parliament, while Paymaster, for a very
+questionable proceeding, this charge no doubt hurt a good deal. Although
+the government did not follow Burke's suggestion of a prosecution
+at that time, there is little doubt that it was he who induced the
+prosecution of Part Second. Before the trial came on, December 18, 1792,
+Paine was occupying his seat in the French Convention, and could only be
+outlawed.
+
+Burke humorously remarked to a friend of Paine and himself, "We hunt
+in pairs." The severally representative character and influence of these
+two men in the revolutionary era, in France and England, deserve more
+adequate study than they have received. While Paine maintained freedom
+of discussion, Burke first proposed criminal prosecution for sentiments
+by no means libellous (such as Paine's Part First). While Paine was
+endeavoring to make the movement in France peaceful, Burke fomented the
+league of monarchs against France which maddened its people, and brought
+on the Reign of Terror. While Paine was endeavoring to preserve the
+French throne ("phantom" though he believed it), to prevent bloodshed,
+Burke was secretly writing to the Queen of France, entreating her not
+to compromise, and to "trust to the support of foreign armies"
+("Histoire de France depuis 1789." Henri Martin, i., 151). While Burke
+thus helped to bring the King and Queen to the guillotine, Paine pleaded
+for their lives to the last moment. While Paine maintained the right of
+mankind to improve their condition, Burke held that "the awful Author
+of our being is the author of our place in the order of existence;
+and that, having disposed and marshalled us by a divine tactick, not
+according to our will, but according to his, he has, in and by that
+disposition, virtually subjected us to act the part which belongs to
+the place assigned us." Paine was a religious believer in eternal
+principles; Burke held that "political problems do not primarily
+concern truth or falsehood. They relate to good or evil. What in the
+result is likely to produce evil is politically false, that which is
+productive of good politically is true." Assuming thus the visionary's
+right to decide before the result what was "likely to produce evil,"
+Burke vigorously sought to kindle war against the French Republic which
+might have developed itself peacefully, while Paine was striving for
+an international Congress in Europe in the interest of peace. Paine
+had faith in the people, and believed that, if allowed to choose
+representatives, they would select their best and wisest men; and that
+while reforming government the people would remain orderly, as they had
+generally remained in America during the transition from British rule
+to selfgovernment. Burke maintained that if the existing political order
+were broken up there would be no longer a people, but "a number of
+vague, loose individuals, and nothing more." "Alas!" he exclaims,
+"they little know how many a weary step is to be taken before they can
+form themselves into a mass, which has a true personality." For the sake
+of peace Paine wished the revolution to be peaceful as the advance of
+summer; he used every endeavor to reconcile English radicals to some
+modus vivendi with the existing order, as he was willing to retain Louis
+XVI. as head of the executive in France: Burke resisted every tendency
+of English statesmanship to reform at home, or to negotiate with the
+French Republic, and was mainly responsible for the King's death and the
+war that followed between England and France in February, 1793. Burke
+became a royal favorite, Paine was outlawed by a prosecution originally
+proposed by Burke. While Paine was demanding religious liberty, Burke
+was opposing the removal of penal statutes from Unitarians, on the
+ground that but for those statutes Paine might some day set up a church
+in England. When Burke was retiring on a large royal pension, Paine
+was in prison, through the devices of Burke's confederate, the American
+Minister in Paris. So the two men, as Burke said, "hunted in pairs."
+
+So far as Burke attempts to affirm any principle he is fairly quoted in
+Paine's work, and nowhere misrepresented. As for Paine's own ideas, the
+reader should remember that "Rights of Man" was the earliest complete
+statement of republican principles. They were pronounced to be the
+fundamental principles of the American Republic by Jefferson, Madison,
+and Jackson,-the three Presidents who above all others represented the
+republican idea which Paine first allied with American Independence.
+Those who suppose that Paine did but reproduce the principles of
+Rousseau and Locke will find by careful study of his well-weighed
+language that such is not the case. Paine's political principles were
+evolved out of his early Quakerism. He was potential in George Fox. The
+belief that every human soul was the child of God, and capable of
+direct inspiration from the Father of all, without mediator or priestly
+intervention, or sacramental instrumentality, was fatal to all privilege
+and rank. The universal Fatherhood implied universal Brotherhood, or
+human equality. But the fate of the Quakers proved the necessity of
+protecting the individual spirit from oppression by the majority as well
+as by privileged classes. For this purpose Paine insisted on surrounding
+the individual right with the security of the Declaration of Rights,
+not to be invaded by any government; and would reduce government to an
+association limited in its operations to the defence of those rights
+which the individual is unable, alone, to maintain.
+
+From the preceding chapter it will be seen that Part Second of "Rights
+of Man" was begun by Paine in the spring of 1791. At the close of that
+year, or early in 1792, he took up his abode with his friend Thomas
+"Clio" Rickman, at No. 7 Upper Marylebone Street. Rickman was a radical
+publisher; the house remains still a book-binding establishment, and
+seems little changed since Paine therein revised the proofs of Part
+Second on a table which Rickman marked with a plate, and which is now in
+possession of Mr. Edward Truelove. As the plate states, Paine wrote on
+the same table other works which appeared in England in 1792.
+
+In 1795 D. I. Eaton published an edition of "Rights of Man," with a
+preface purporting to have been written by Paine while in Luxembourg
+prison. It is manifestly spurious. The genuine English and French
+prefaces are given.
+
+
+
+
+RIGHTS OF MAN
+
+Being An Answer To Mr. Burke's Attack On The French Revoloution
+
+By Thomas Paine
+
+Secretary For Foreign Affairs To Congress In The American War, And
+Author Of The Works Entitled "Common Sense" And "A Letter To Abbe
+Raynal"
+
+
+
+ DEDICATION
+
+ George Washington
+
+ President Of The United States Of America
+
+ Sir,
+
+ I present you a small treatise in defence of those principles of
+ freedom which your exemplary virtue hath so eminently contributed to
+ establish. That the Rights of Man may become as universal as your
+ benevolence can wish, and that you may enjoy the happiness of seeing
+ the New World regenerate the Old, is the prayer of
+
+ Sir,
+
+ Your much obliged, and
+
+ Obedient humble Servant,
+
+ Thomas Paine
+
+
+
+
+PAINE'S PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION
+
+From the part Mr. Burke took in the American Revolution, it was natural
+that I should consider him a friend to mankind; and as our acquaintance
+commenced on that ground, it would have been more agreeable to me to
+have had cause to continue in that opinion than to change it.
+
+At the time Mr. Burke made his violent speech last winter in the English
+Parliament against the French Revolution and the National Assembly, I
+was in Paris, and had written to him but a short time before to inform
+him how prosperously matters were going on. Soon after this I saw his
+advertisement of the Pamphlet he intended to publish: As the attack
+was to be made in a language but little studied, and less understood in
+France, and as everything suffers by translation, I promised some of
+the friends of the Revolution in that country that whenever Mr. Burke's
+Pamphlet came forth, I would answer it. This appeared to me the more
+necessary to be done, when I saw the flagrant misrepresentations which
+Mr. Burke's Pamphlet contains; and that while it is an outrageous
+abuse on the French Revolution, and the principles of Liberty, it is an
+imposition on the rest of the world.
+
+I am the more astonished and disappointed at this conduct in Mr. Burke,
+as (from the circumstances I am going to mention) I had formed other
+expectations.
+
+I had seen enough of the miseries of war, to wish it might never more
+have existence in the world, and that some other mode might be found
+out to settle the differences that should occasionally arise in the
+neighbourhood of nations. This certainly might be done if Courts were
+disposed to set honesty about it, or if countries were enlightened
+enough not to be made the dupes of Courts. The people of America had
+been bred up in the same prejudices against France, which at that time
+characterised the people of England; but experience and an acquaintance
+with the French Nation have most effectually shown to the Americans the
+falsehood of those prejudices; and I do not believe that a more cordial
+and confidential intercourse exists between any two countries than
+between America and France.
+
+When I came to France, in the spring of 1787, the Archbishop of
+Thoulouse was then Minister, and at that time highly esteemed. I became
+much acquainted with the private Secretary of that Minister, a man of
+an enlarged benevolent heart; and found that his sentiments and my own
+perfectly agreed with respect to the madness of war, and the wretched
+impolicy of two nations, like England and France, continually worrying
+each other, to no other end than that of a mutual increase of burdens
+and taxes. That I might be assured I had not misunderstood him, nor he
+me, I put the substance of our opinions into writing and sent it to him;
+subjoining a request, that if I should see among the people of England,
+any disposition to cultivate a better understanding between the two
+nations than had hitherto prevailed, how far I might be authorised
+to say that the same disposition prevailed on the part of France? He
+answered me by letter in the most unreserved manner, and that not for
+himself only, but for the Minister, with whose knowledge the letter was
+declared to be written.
+
+I put this letter into the hands of Mr. Burke almost three years ago,
+and left it with him, where it still remains; hoping, and at the same
+time naturally expecting, from the opinion I had conceived of him, that
+he would find some opportunity of making good use of it, for the purpose
+of removing those errors and prejudices which two neighbouring nations,
+from the want of knowing each other, had entertained, to the injury of
+both.
+
+When the French Revolution broke out, it certainly afforded to Mr. Burke
+an opportunity of doing some good, had he been disposed to it; instead
+of which, no sooner did he see the old prejudices wearing away, than he
+immediately began sowing the seeds of a new inveteracy, as if he were
+afraid that England and France would cease to be enemies. That there are
+men in all countries who get their living by war, and by keeping up the
+quarrels of Nations, is as shocking as it is true; but when those who
+are concerned in the government of a country, make it their study to sow
+discord and cultivate prejudices between Nations, it becomes the more
+unpardonable.
+
+With respect to a paragraph in this work alluding to Mr. Burke's having
+a pension, the report has been some time in circulation, at least two
+months; and as a person is often the last to hear what concerns him
+the most to know, I have mentioned it, that Mr. Burke may have an
+opportunity of contradicting the rumour, if he thinks proper.
+
+ Thomas Paine
+
+
+
+
+PAINE'S PREFACE TO THE FRENCH EDITION
+
+The astonishment which the French Revolution has caused throughout
+Europe should be considered from two different points of view: first as
+it affects foreign peoples, secondly as it affects their governments.
+
+The cause of the French people is that of all Europe, or rather of the
+whole world; but the governments of all those countries are by no means
+favorable to it. It is important that we should never lose sight of this
+distinction. We must not confuse the peoples with their governments;
+especially not the English people with its government.
+
+The government of England is no friend of the revolution of France.
+Of this we have sufficient proofs in the thanks given by that weak and
+witless person, the Elector of Hanover, sometimes called the King of
+England, to Mr. Burke for the insults heaped on it in his book, and in
+the malevolent comments of the English Minister, Pitt, in his speeches
+in Parliament.
+
+In spite of the professions of sincerest friendship found in the
+official correspondence of the English government with that of France,
+its conduct gives the lie to all its declarations, and shows us clearly
+that it is not a court to be trusted, but an insane court, plunging in
+all the quarrels and intrigues of Europe, in quest of a war to satisfy
+its folly and countenance its extravagance.
+
+The English nation, on the contrary, is very favorably disposed towards
+the French Revolution, and to the progress of liberty in the whole
+world; and this feeling will become more general in England as the
+intrigues and artifices of its government are better known, and the
+principles of the revolution better understood. The French should know
+that most English newspapers are directly in the pay of government, or,
+if indirectly connected with it, always under its orders; and that those
+papers constantly distort and attack the revolution in France in order
+to deceive the nation. But, as it is impossible long to prevent the
+prevalence of truth, the daily falsehoods of those papers no longer have
+the desired effect.
+
+To be convinced that the voice of truth has been stifled in England, the
+world needs only to be told that the government regards and prosecutes
+as a libel that which it should protect.*[1] This outrage on morality is
+called law, and judges are found wicked enough to inflict penalties on
+truth.
+
+The English government presents, just now, a curious phenomenon. Seeing
+that the French and English nations are getting rid of the prejudices
+and false notions formerly entertained against each other, and which
+have cost them so much money, that government seems to be placarding its
+need of a foe; for unless it finds one somewhere, no pretext exists for
+the enormous revenue and taxation now deemed necessary.
+
+Therefore it seeks in Russia the enemy it has lost in France, and
+appears to say to the universe, or to say to itself. "If nobody will be
+so kind as to become my foe, I shall need no more fleets nor armies,
+and shall be forced to reduce my taxes. The American war enabled me to
+double the taxes; the Dutch business to add more; the Nootka humbug gave
+me a pretext for raising three millions sterling more; but unless I can
+make an enemy of Russia the harvest from wars will end. I was the first
+to incite Turk against Russian, and now I hope to reap a fresh crop of
+taxes."
+
+If the miseries of war, and the flood of evils it spreads over a
+country, did not check all inclination to mirth, and turn laughter
+into grief, the frantic conduct of the government of England would only
+excite ridicule. But it is impossible to banish from one's mind the
+images of suffering which the contemplation of such vicious policy
+presents. To reason with governments, as they have existed for ages,
+is to argue with brutes. It is only from the nations themselves that
+reforms can be expected. There ought not now to exist any doubt that the
+peoples of France, England, and America, enlightened and enlightening
+each other, shall henceforth be able, not merely to give the world an
+example of good government, but by their united influence enforce its
+practice.
+
+(Translated from the French)
+
+
+
+
+RIGHTS OF MAN. PART THE FIRST BEING AN ANSWER TO MR. BURKE'S ATTACK ON
+THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
+
+
+Among the incivilities by which nations or individuals provoke and
+irritate each other, Mr. Burke's pamphlet on the French Revolution is an
+extraordinary instance. Neither the People of France, nor the National
+Assembly, were troubling themselves about the affairs of England, or
+the English Parliament; and that Mr. Burke should commence an unprovoked
+attack upon them, both in Parliament and in public, is a conduct that
+cannot be pardoned on the score of manners, nor justified on that of
+policy.
+
+There is scarcely an epithet of abuse to be found in the English
+language, with which Mr. Burke has not loaded the French Nation and the
+National Assembly. Everything which rancour, prejudice, ignorance or
+knowledge could suggest, is poured forth in the copious fury of near
+four hundred pages. In the strain and on the plan Mr. Burke was writing,
+he might have written on to as many thousands. When the tongue or the
+pen is let loose in a frenzy of passion, it is the man, and not the
+subject, that becomes exhausted.
+
+Hitherto Mr. Burke has been mistaken and disappointed in the opinions
+he had formed of the affairs of France; but such is the ingenuity of his
+hope, or the malignancy of his despair, that it furnishes him with new
+pretences to go on. There was a time when it was impossible to make Mr.
+Burke believe there would be any Revolution in France. His opinion then
+was, that the French had neither spirit to undertake it nor fortitude to
+support it; and now that there is one, he seeks an escape by condemning
+it.
+
+Not sufficiently content with abusing the National Assembly, a great
+part of his work is taken up with abusing Dr. Price (one of the
+best-hearted men that lives) and the two societies in England known by
+the name of the Revolution Society and the Society for Constitutional
+Information.
+
+Dr. Price had preached a sermon on the 4th of November, 1789, being
+the anniversary of what is called in England the Revolution, which took
+place 1688. Mr. Burke, speaking of this sermon, says: "The political
+Divine proceeds dogmatically to assert, that by the principles of
+the Revolution, the people of England have acquired three fundamental
+rights:
+
+1. To choose our own governors.
+
+2. To cashier them for misconduct.
+
+3. To frame a government for ourselves."
+
+Dr. Price does not say that the right to do these things exists in this
+or in that person, or in this or in that description of persons, but
+that it exists in the whole; that it is a right resident in the nation.
+Mr. Burke, on the contrary, denies that such a right exists in the
+nation, either in whole or in part, or that it exists anywhere; and,
+what is still more strange and marvellous, he says: "that the people
+of England utterly disclaim such a right, and that they will resist
+the practical assertion of it with their lives and fortunes." That men
+should take up arms and spend their lives and fortunes, not to maintain
+their rights, but to maintain they have not rights, is an entirely new
+species of discovery, and suited to the paradoxical genius of Mr. Burke.
+
+The method which Mr. Burke takes to prove that the people of England
+have no such rights, and that such rights do not now exist in the
+nation, either in whole or in part, or anywhere at all, is of the same
+marvellous and monstrous kind with what he has already said; for his
+arguments are that the persons, or the generation of persons, in whom
+they did exist, are dead, and with them the right is dead also. To prove
+this, he quotes a declaration made by Parliament about a hundred years
+ago, to William and Mary, in these words: "The Lords Spiritual and
+Temporal, and Commons, do, in the name of the people aforesaid" (meaning
+the people of England then living) "most humbly and faithfully submit
+themselves, their heirs and posterities, for Ever." He quotes a clause
+of another Act of Parliament made in the same reign, the terms of which
+he says, "bind us" (meaning the people of their day), "our heirs and our
+posterity, to them, their heirs and posterity, to the end of time."
+
+Mr. Burke conceives his point sufficiently established by producing
+those clauses, which he enforces by saying that they exclude the
+right of the nation for ever. And not yet content with making such
+declarations, repeated over and over again, he farther says, "that if
+the people of England possessed such a right before the Revolution"
+(which he acknowledges to have been the case, not only in England, but
+throughout Europe, at an early period), "yet that the English Nation
+did, at the time of the Revolution, most solemnly renounce and abdicate
+it, for themselves, and for all their posterity, for ever."
+
+As Mr. Burke occasionally applies the poison drawn from his horrid
+principles, not only to the English nation, but to the French Revolution
+and the National Assembly, and charges that august, illuminated and
+illuminating body of men with the epithet of usurpers, I shall, sans
+ceremonie, place another system of principles in opposition to his.
+
+The English Parliament of 1688 did a certain thing, which, for
+themselves and their constituents, they had a right to do, and which
+it appeared right should be done. But, in addition to this right, which
+they possessed by delegation, they set up another right by assumption,
+that of binding and controlling posterity to the end of time. The case,
+therefore, divides itself into two parts; the right which they possessed
+by delegation, and the right which they set up by assumption. The first
+is admitted; but with respect to the second, I reply: There never
+did, there never will, and there never can, exist a Parliament, or any
+description of men, or any generation of men, in any country, possessed
+of the right or the power of binding and controlling posterity to
+the "end of time," or of commanding for ever how the world shall be
+governed, or who shall govern it; and therefore all such clauses, acts
+or declarations by which the makers of them attempt to do what they have
+neither the right nor the power to do, nor the power to execute, are in
+themselves null and void. Every age and generation must be as free to
+act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded
+it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most
+ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man;
+neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to
+follow. The Parliament or the people of 1688, or of any other period,
+had no more right to dispose of the people of the present day, or to
+bind or to control them in any shape whatever, than the parliament or
+the people of the present day have to dispose of, bind or control those
+who are to live a hundred or a thousand years hence. Every generation
+is, and must be, competent to all the purposes which its occasions
+require. It is the living, and not the dead, that are to be
+accommodated. When man ceases to be, his power and his wants cease with
+him; and having no longer any participation in the concerns of this
+world, he has no longer any authority in directing who shall be
+its governors, or how its government shall be organised, or how
+administered.
+
+I am not contending for nor against any form of government, nor for nor
+against any party, here or elsewhere. That which a whole nation chooses
+to do it has a right to do. Mr. Burke says, No. Where, then, does the
+right exist? I am contending for the rights of the living, and against
+their being willed away and controlled and contracted for by the
+manuscript assumed authority of the dead, and Mr. Burke is contending
+for the authority of the dead over the rights and freedom of the living.
+There was a time when kings disposed of their crowns by will upon their
+death-beds, and consigned the people, like beasts of the field, to
+whatever successor they appointed. This is now so exploded as scarcely
+to be remembered, and so monstrous as hardly to be believed. But the
+Parliamentary clauses upon which Mr. Burke builds his political church
+are of the same nature.
+
+The laws of every country must be analogous to some common principle.
+In England no parent or master, nor all the authority of Parliament,
+omnipotent as it has called itself, can bind or control the personal
+freedom even of an individual beyond the age of twenty-one years. On
+what ground of right, then, could the Parliament of 1688, or any other
+Parliament, bind all posterity for ever?
+
+Those who have quitted the world, and those who have not yet arrived
+at it, are as remote from each other as the utmost stretch of mortal
+imagination can conceive. What possible obligation, then, can exist
+between them--what rule or principle can be laid down that of two
+nonentities, the one out of existence and the other not in, and who
+never can meet in this world, the one should control the other to the
+end of time?
+
+In England it is said that money cannot be taken out of the pockets
+of the people without their consent. But who authorised, or who could
+authorise, the Parliament of 1688 to control and take away the freedom
+of posterity (who were not in existence to give or to withhold their
+consent) and limit and confine their right of acting in certain cases
+for ever?
+
+A greater absurdity cannot present itself to the understanding of man
+than what Mr. Burke offers to his readers. He tells them, and he tells
+the world to come, that a certain body of men who existed a hundred
+years ago made a law, and that there does not exist in the nation, nor
+ever will, nor ever can, a power to alter it. Under how many subtilties
+or absurdities has the divine right to govern been imposed on the
+credulity of mankind? Mr. Burke has discovered a new one, and he
+has shortened his journey to Rome by appealing to the power of this
+infallible Parliament of former days, and he produces what it has done
+as of divine authority, for that power must certainly be more than human
+which no human power to the end of time can alter.
+
+But Mr. Burke has done some service--not to his cause, but to his
+country--by bringing those clauses into public view. They serve to
+demonstrate how necessary it is at all times to watch against the
+attempted encroachment of power, and to prevent its running to excess.
+It is somewhat extraordinary that the offence for which James II. was
+expelled, that of setting up power by assumption, should be re-acted,
+under another shape and form, by the Parliament that expelled him. It
+shows that the Rights of Man were but imperfectly understood at the
+Revolution, for certain it is that the right which that Parliament set
+up by assumption (for by the delegation it had not, and could not
+have it, because none could give it) over the persons and freedom of
+posterity for ever was of the same tyrannical unfounded kind which James
+attempted to set up over the Parliament and the nation, and for which he
+was expelled. The only difference is (for in principle they differ not)
+that the one was an usurper over living, and the other over the unborn;
+and as the one has no better authority to stand upon than the other,
+both of them must be equally null and void, and of no effect.
+
+From what, or from whence, does Mr. Burke prove the right of any human
+power to bind posterity for ever? He has produced his clauses, but he
+must produce also his proofs that such a right existed, and show how it
+existed. If it ever existed it must now exist, for whatever appertains
+to the nature of man cannot be annihilated by man. It is the nature of
+man to die, and he will continue to die as long as he continues to be
+born. But Mr. Burke has set up a sort of political Adam, in whom all
+posterity are bound for ever. He must, therefore, prove that his Adam
+possessed such a power, or such a right.
+
+The weaker any cord is, the less will it bear to be stretched, and the
+worse is the policy to stretch it, unless it is intended to break it.
+Had anyone proposed the overthrow of Mr. Burke's positions, he would
+have proceeded as Mr. Burke has done. He would have magnified the
+authorities, on purpose to have called the right of them into question;
+and the instant the question of right was started, the authorities must
+have been given up.
+
+It requires but a very small glance of thought to perceive that although
+laws made in one generation often continue in force through succeeding
+generations, yet they continue to derive their force from the consent of
+the living. A law not repealed continues in force, not because it cannot
+be repealed, but because it is not repealed; and the non-repealing
+passes for consent.
+
+But Mr. Burke's clauses have not even this qualification in their
+favour. They become null, by attempting to become immortal. The nature
+of them precludes consent. They destroy the right which they might have,
+by grounding it on a right which they cannot have. Immortal power is
+not a human right, and therefore cannot be a right of Parliament. The
+Parliament of 1688 might as well have passed an act to have authorised
+themselves to live for ever, as to make their authority live for ever.
+All, therefore, that can be said of those clauses is that they are a
+formality of words, of as much import as if those who used them had
+addressed a congratulation to themselves, and in the oriental style of
+antiquity had said: O Parliament, live for ever!
+
+The circumstances of the world are continually changing, and the
+opinions of men change also; and as government is for the living, and
+not for the dead, it is the living only that has any right in it.
+That which may be thought right and found convenient in one age may be
+thought wrong and found inconvenient in another. In such cases, who is
+to decide, the living or the dead?
+
+As almost one hundred pages of Mr. Burke's book are employed upon these
+clauses, it will consequently follow that if the clauses themselves, so
+far as they set up an assumed usurped dominion over posterity for ever,
+are unauthoritative, and in their nature null and void; that all his
+voluminous inferences, and declamation drawn therefrom, or founded
+thereon, are null and void also; and on this ground I rest the matter.
+
+We now come more particularly to the affairs of France. Mr. Burke's book
+has the appearance of being written as instruction to the French nation;
+but if I may permit myself the use of an extravagant metaphor, suited
+to the extravagance of the case, it is darkness attempting to illuminate
+light.
+
+While I am writing this there are accidentally before me some proposals
+for a declaration of rights by the Marquis de la Fayette (I ask his
+pardon for using his former address, and do it only for distinction's
+sake) to the National Assembly, on the 11th of July, 1789, three
+days before the taking of the Bastille, and I cannot but remark with
+astonishment how opposite the sources are from which that gentleman and
+Mr. Burke draw their principles. Instead of referring to musty records
+and mouldy parchments to prove that the rights of the living are lost,
+"renounced and abdicated for ever," by those who are now no more, as
+Mr. Burke has done, M. de la Fayette applies to the living world,
+and emphatically says: "Call to mind the sentiments which nature has
+engraved on the heart of every citizen, and which take a new force when
+they are solemnly recognised by all:--For a nation to love liberty, it
+is sufficient that she knows it; and to be free, it is sufficient that
+she wills it." How dry, barren, and obscure is the source from which Mr.
+Burke labors! and how ineffectual, though gay with flowers, are all his
+declamation and his arguments compared with these clear, concise, and
+soul-animating sentiments! Few and short as they are, they lead on to a
+vast field of generous and manly thinking, and do not finish, like Mr.
+Burke's periods, with music in the ear, and nothing in the heart.
+
+As I have introduced M. de la Fayette, I will take the liberty of adding
+an anecdote respecting his farewell address to the Congress of America
+in 1783, and which occurred fresh to my mind, when I saw Mr. Burke's
+thundering attack on the French Revolution. M. de la Fayette went to
+America at the early period of the war, and continued a volunteer in her
+service to the end. His conduct through the whole of that enterprise is
+one of the most extraordinary that is to be found in the history of a
+young man, scarcely twenty years of age. Situated in a country that was
+like the lap of sensual pleasure, and with the means of enjoying it, how
+few are there to be found who would exchange such a scene for the woods
+and wildernesses of America, and pass the flowery years of youth in
+unprofitable danger and hardship! but such is the fact. When the
+war ended, and he was on the point of taking his final departure, he
+presented himself to Congress, and contemplating in his affectionate
+farewell the Revolution he had seen, expressed himself in these words:
+"May this great monument raised to liberty serve as a lesson to the
+oppressor, and an example to the oppressed!" When this address came to
+the hands of Dr. Franklin, who was then in France, he applied to Count
+Vergennes to have it inserted in the French Gazette, but never
+could obtain his consent. The fact was that Count Vergennes was an
+aristocratical despot at home, and dreaded the example of the American
+Revolution in France, as certain other persons now dread the example of
+the French Revolution in England, and Mr. Burke's tribute of fear (for
+in this light his book must be considered) runs parallel with Count
+Vergennes' refusal. But to return more particularly to his work.
+
+"We have seen," says Mr. Burke, "the French rebel against a mild and
+lawful monarch, with more fury, outrage, and insult, than any people
+has been known to rise against the most illegal usurper, or the most
+sanguinary tyrant." This is one among a thousand other instances, in
+which Mr. Burke shows that he is ignorant of the springs and principles
+of the French Revolution.
+
+It was not against Louis XVI. but against the despotic principles of
+the Government, that the nation revolted. These principles had not their
+origin in him, but in the original establishment, many centuries back:
+and they were become too deeply rooted to be removed, and the Augean
+stables of parasites and plunderers too abominably filthy to be cleansed
+by anything short of a complete and universal Revolution. When it
+becomes necessary to do anything, the whole heart and soul should go
+into the measure, or not attempt it. That crisis was then arrived, and
+there remained no choice but to act with determined vigor, or not to
+act at all. The king was known to be the friend of the nation, and this
+circumstance was favorable to the enterprise. Perhaps no man bred up in
+the style of an absolute king, ever possessed a heart so little disposed
+to the exercise of that species of power as the present King of France.
+But the principles of the Government itself still remained the same. The
+Monarch and the Monarchy were distinct and separate things; and it was
+against the established despotism of the latter, and not against the
+person or principles of the former, that the revolt commenced, and the
+Revolution has been carried.
+
+Mr. Burke does not attend to the distinction between men and principles,
+and, therefore, he does not see that a revolt may take place against the
+despotism of the latter, while there lies no charge of despotism against
+the former.
+
+The natural moderation of Louis XVI. contributed nothing to alter
+the hereditary despotism of the monarchy. All the tyrannies of former
+reigns, acted under that hereditary despotism, were still liable to be
+revived in the hands of a successor. It was not the respite of a reign
+that would satisfy France, enlightened as she was then become. A casual
+discontinuance of the practice of despotism, is not a discontinuance of
+its principles: the former depends on the virtue of the individual who
+is in immediate possession of the power; the latter, on the virtue and
+fortitude of the nation. In the case of Charles I. and James II. of
+England, the revolt was against the personal despotism of the men;
+whereas in France, it was against the hereditary despotism of the
+established Government. But men who can consign over the rights of
+posterity for ever on the authority of a mouldy parchment, like Mr.
+Burke, are not qualified to judge of this Revolution. It takes in
+a field too vast for their views to explore, and proceeds with a
+mightiness of reason they cannot keep pace with.
+
+But there are many points of view in which this Revolution may be
+considered. When despotism has established itself for ages in a country,
+as in France, it is not in the person of the king only that it resides.
+It has the appearance of being so in show, and in nominal authority; but
+it is not so in practice and in fact. It has its standard everywhere.
+Every office and department has its despotism, founded upon custom and
+usage. Every place has its Bastille, and every Bastille its despot.
+The original hereditary despotism resident in the person of the king,
+divides and sub-divides itself into a thousand shapes and forms, till
+at last the whole of it is acted by deputation. This was the case in
+France; and against this species of despotism, proceeding on through
+an endless labyrinth of office till the source of it is scarcely
+perceptible, there is no mode of redress. It strengthens itself by
+assuming the appearance of duty, and tyrannizes under the pretence of
+obeying.
+
+When a man reflects on the condition which France was in from the nature
+of her government, he will see other causes for revolt than those which
+immediately connect themselves with the person or character of Louis
+XVI. There were, if I may so express it, a thousand despotisms to be
+reformed in France, which had grown up under the hereditary despotism
+of the monarchy, and became so rooted as to be in a great measure
+independent of it. Between the Monarchy, the Parliament, and the
+Church there was a rivalship of despotism; besides the feudal despotism
+operating locally, and the ministerial despotism operating everywhere.
+But Mr. Burke, by considering the king as the only possible object of
+a revolt, speaks as if France was a village, in which everything that
+passed must be known to its commanding officer, and no oppression could
+be acted but what he could immediately control. Mr. Burke might have
+been in the Bastille his whole life, as well under Louis XVI. as Louis
+XIV., and neither the one nor the other have known that such a man as
+Burke existed. The despotic principles of the government were the same
+in both reigns, though the dispositions of the men were as remote as
+tyranny and benevolence.
+
+What Mr. Burke considers as a reproach to the French Revolution (that of
+bringing it forward under a reign more mild than the preceding ones)
+is one of its highest honors. The Revolutions that have taken place in
+other European countries, have been excited by personal hatred. The rage
+was against the man, and he became the victim. But, in the instance of
+France we see a Revolution generated in the rational contemplation of
+the Rights of Man, and distinguishing from the beginning between persons
+and principles.
+
+But Mr. Burke appears to have no idea of principles when he is
+contemplating Governments. "Ten years ago," says he, "I could have
+felicitated France on her having a Government, without inquiring what
+the nature of that Government was, or how it was administered." Is this
+the language of a rational man? Is it the language of a heart feeling as
+it ought to feel for the rights and happiness of the human race? On
+this ground, Mr. Burke must compliment all the Governments in the world,
+while the victims who suffer under them, whether sold into slavery, or
+tortured out of existence, are wholly forgotten. It is power, and
+not principles, that Mr. Burke venerates; and under this abominable
+depravity he is disqualified to judge between them. Thus much for his
+opinion as to the occasions of the French Revolution. I now proceed to
+other considerations.
+
+I know a place in America called Point-no-Point, because as you proceed
+along the shore, gay and flowery as Mr. Burke's language, it continually
+recedes and presents itself at a distance before you; but when you have
+got as far as you can go, there is no point at all. Just thus it is with
+Mr. Burke's three hundred and sixty-six pages. It is therefore difficult
+to reply to him. But as the points he wishes to establish may be
+inferred from what he abuses, it is in his paradoxes that we must look
+for his arguments.
+
+As to the tragic paintings by which Mr. Burke has outraged his own
+imagination, and seeks to work upon that of his readers, they are
+very well calculated for theatrical representation, where facts are
+manufactured for the sake of show, and accommodated to produce, through
+the weakness of sympathy, a weeping effect. But Mr. Burke should
+recollect that he is writing history, and not plays, and that his
+readers will expect truth, and not the spouting rant of high-toned
+exclamation.
+
+When we see a man dramatically lamenting in a publication intended to be
+believed that "The age of chivalry is gone! that The glory of Europe is
+extinguished for ever! that The unbought grace of life (if anyone knows
+what it is), the cheap defence of nations, the nurse of manly sentiment
+and heroic enterprise is gone!" and all this because the Quixot age of
+chivalry nonsense is gone, what opinion can we form of his judgment, or
+what regard can we pay to his facts? In the rhapsody of his imagination
+he has discovered a world of wind mills, and his sorrows are that there
+are no Quixots to attack them. But if the age of aristocracy, like that
+of chivalry, should fall (and they had originally some connection) Mr.
+Burke, the trumpeter of the Order, may continue his parody to the end,
+and finish with exclaiming: "Othello's occupation's gone!"
+
+Notwithstanding Mr. Burke's horrid paintings, when the French Revolution
+is compared with the Revolutions of other countries, the astonishment
+will be that it is marked with so few sacrifices; but this astonishment
+will cease when we reflect that principles, and not persons, were the
+meditated objects of destruction. The mind of the nation was acted
+upon by a higher stimulus than what the consideration of persons could
+inspire, and sought a higher conquest than could be produced by the
+downfall of an enemy. Among the few who fell there do not appear to be
+any that were intentionally singled out. They all of them had their fate
+in the circumstances of the moment, and were not pursued with that long,
+cold-blooded unabated revenge which pursued the unfortunate Scotch in
+the affair of 1745.
+
+Through the whole of Mr. Burke's book I do not observe that the Bastille
+is mentioned more than once, and that with a kind of implication as if
+he were sorry it was pulled down, and wished it were built up again. "We
+have rebuilt Newgate," says he, "and tenanted the mansion; and we have
+prisons almost as strong as the Bastille for those who dare to libel the
+queens of France."*[2] As to what a madman like the person called Lord
+George Gordon might say, and to whom Newgate is rather a bedlam than a
+prison, it is unworthy a rational consideration. It was a madman that
+libelled, and that is sufficient apology; and it afforded an opportunity
+for confining him, which was the thing that was wished for. But certain
+it is that Mr. Burke, who does not call himself a madman (whatever other
+people may do), has libelled in the most unprovoked manner, and in
+the grossest style of the most vulgar abuse, the whole representative
+authority of France, and yet Mr. Burke takes his seat in the British
+House of Commons! From his violence and his grief, his silence on some
+points and his excess on others, it is difficult not to believe that Mr.
+Burke is sorry, extremely sorry, that arbitrary power, the power of the
+Pope and the Bastille, are pulled down.
+
+Not one glance of compassion, not one commiserating reflection that I
+can find throughout his book, has he bestowed on those who lingered out
+the most wretched of lives, a life without hope in the most miserable of
+prisons. It is painful to behold a man employing his talents to corrupt
+himself. Nature has been kinder to Mr. Burke than he is to her. He is
+not affected by the reality of distress touching his heart, but by the
+showy resemblance of it striking his imagination. He pities the plumage,
+but forgets the dying bird. Accustomed to kiss the aristocratical hand
+that hath purloined him from himself, he degenerates into a composition
+of art, and the genuine soul of nature forsakes him. His hero or his
+heroine must be a tragedy-victim expiring in show, and not the real
+prisoner of misery, sliding into death in the silence of a dungeon.
+
+As Mr. Burke has passed over the whole transaction of the Bastille (and
+his silence is nothing in his favour), and has entertained his readers
+with refections on supposed facts distorted into real falsehoods, I will
+give, since he has not, some account of the circumstances which preceded
+that transaction. They will serve to show that less mischief could
+scarcely have accompanied such an event when considered with the
+treacherous and hostile aggravations of the enemies of the Revolution.
+
+The mind can hardly picture to itself a more tremendous scene than what
+the city of Paris exhibited at the time of taking the Bastille, and for
+two days before and after, nor perceive the possibility of its quieting
+so soon. At a distance this transaction has appeared only as an act of
+heroism standing on itself, and the close political connection it had
+with the Revolution is lost in the brilliancy of the achievement. But
+we are to consider it as the strength of the parties brought man to man,
+and contending for the issue. The Bastille was to be either the prize
+or the prison of the assailants. The downfall of it included the idea
+of the downfall of despotism, and this compounded image was become as
+figuratively united as Bunyan's Doubting Castle and Giant Despair.
+
+The National Assembly, before and at the time of taking the Bastille,
+was sitting at Versailles, twelve miles distant from Paris. About a week
+before the rising of the Partisans, and their taking the Bastille, it
+was discovered that a plot was forming, at the head of which was
+the Count D'Artois, the king's youngest brother, for demolishing the
+National Assembly, seizing its members, and thereby crushing, by a coup
+de main, all hopes and prospects of forming a free government. For
+the sake of humanity, as well as freedom, it is well this plan did not
+succeed. Examples are not wanting to show how dreadfully vindictive and
+cruel are all old governments, when they are successful against what
+they call a revolt.
+
+This plan must have been some time in contemplation; because, in order
+to carry it into execution, it was necessary to collect a large military
+force round Paris, and cut off the communication between that city
+and the National Assembly at Versailles. The troops destined for this
+service were chiefly the foreign troops in the pay of France, and who,
+for this particular purpose, were drawn from the distant provinces where
+they were then stationed. When they were collected to the amount of
+between twenty-five and thirty thousand, it was judged time to put the
+plan into execution. The ministry who were then in office, and who were
+friendly to the Revolution, were instantly dismissed and a new ministry
+formed of those who had concerted the project, among whom was Count de
+Broglio, and to his share was given the command of those troops.
+The character of this man as described to me in a letter which I
+communicated to Mr. Burke before he began to write his book, and from
+an authority which Mr. Burke well knows was good, was that of "a
+high-flying aristocrat, cool, and capable of every mischief."
+
+While these matters were agitating, the National Assembly stood in the
+most perilous and critical situation that a body of men can be supposed
+to act in. They were the devoted victims, and they knew it. They had the
+hearts and wishes of their country on their side, but military authority
+they had none. The guards of Broglio surrounded the hall where the
+Assembly sat, ready, at the word of command, to seize their persons,
+as had been done the year before to the Parliament of Paris. Had the
+National Assembly deserted their trust, or had they exhibited signs of
+weakness or fear, their enemies had been encouraged and their country
+depressed. When the situation they stood in, the cause they were engaged
+in, and the crisis then ready to burst, which should determine their
+personal and political fate and that of their country, and probably of
+Europe, are taken into one view, none but a heart callous with prejudice
+or corrupted by dependence can avoid interesting itself in their
+success.
+
+The Archbishop of Vienne was at this time President of the National
+Assembly--a person too old to undergo the scene that a few days or a few
+hours might bring forth. A man of more activity and bolder fortitude
+was necessary, and the National Assembly chose (under the form of a
+Vice-President, for the Presidency still resided in the Archbishop) M.
+de la Fayette; and this is the only instance of a Vice-President being
+chosen. It was at the moment that this storm was pending (July 11th)
+that a declaration of rights was brought forward by M. de la Fayette,
+and is the same which is alluded to earlier. It was hastily drawn up,
+and makes only a part of the more extensive declaration of rights agreed
+upon and adopted afterwards by the National Assembly. The particular
+reason for bringing it forward at this moment (M. de la Fayette has
+since informed me) was that, if the National Assembly should fall in
+the threatened destruction that then surrounded it, some trace of its
+principles might have the chance of surviving the wreck.
+
+Everything now was drawing to a crisis. The event was freedom or
+slavery. On one side, an army of nearly thirty thousand men; on the
+other, an unarmed body of citizens--for the citizens of Paris, on whom
+the National Assembly must then immediately depend, were as unarmed and
+as undisciplined as the citizens of London are now. The French guards
+had given strong symptoms of their being attached to the national cause;
+but their numbers were small, not a tenth part of the force that Broglio
+commanded, and their officers were in the interest of Broglio.
+
+Matters being now ripe for execution, the new ministry made their
+appearance in office. The reader will carry in his mind that the
+Bastille was taken the 14th July; the point of time I am now speaking of
+is the 12th. Immediately on the news of the change of ministry reaching
+Paris, in the afternoon, all the playhouses and places of entertainment,
+shops and houses, were shut up. The change of ministry was considered as
+the prelude of hostilities, and the opinion was rightly founded.
+
+The foreign troops began to advance towards the city. The Prince de
+Lambesc, who commanded a body of German cavalry, approached by the Place
+of Louis Xv., which connects itself with some of the streets. In his
+march, he insulted and struck an old man with a sword. The French are
+remarkable for their respect to old age; and the insolence with which it
+appeared to be done, uniting with the general fermentation they were
+in, produced a powerful effect, and a cry of "To arms! to arms!" spread
+itself in a moment over the city.
+
+Arms they had none, nor scarcely anyone who knew the use of them; but
+desperate resolution, when every hope is at stake, supplies, for a
+while, the want of arms. Near where the Prince de Lambesc was drawn up,
+were large piles of stones collected for building the new bridge, and
+with these the people attacked the cavalry. A party of French guards
+upon hearing the firing, rushed from their quarters and joined the
+people; and night coming on, the cavalry retreated.
+
+The streets of Paris, being narrow, are favourable for defence, and the
+loftiness of the houses, consisting of many stories, from which great
+annoyance might be given, secured them against nocturnal enterprises;
+and the night was spent in providing themselves with every sort of
+weapon they could make or procure: guns, swords, blacksmiths' hammers,
+carpenters' axes, iron crows, pikes, halberts, pitchforks, spits, clubs,
+etc., etc. The incredible numbers in which they assembled the next
+morning, and the still more incredible resolution they exhibited,
+embarrassed and astonished their enemies. Little did the new ministry
+expect such a salute. Accustomed to slavery themselves, they had no idea
+that liberty was capable of such inspiration, or that a body of unarmed
+citizens would dare to face the military force of thirty thousand men.
+Every moment of this day was employed in collecting arms, concerting
+plans, and arranging themselves into the best order which such an
+instantaneous movement could afford. Broglio continued lying round the
+city, but made no further advances this day, and the succeeding night
+passed with as much tranquility as such a scene could possibly produce.
+
+But defence only was not the object of the citizens. They had a cause
+at stake, on which depended their freedom or their slavery. They every
+moment expected an attack, or to hear of one made on the National
+Assembly; and in such a situation, the most prompt measures are
+sometimes the best. The object that now presented itself was the
+Bastille; and the eclat of carrying such a fortress in the face of such
+an army, could not fail to strike terror into the new ministry, who had
+scarcely yet had time to meet. By some intercepted correspondence this
+morning, it was discovered that the Mayor of Paris, M. Defflesselles,
+who appeared to be in the interest of the citizens, was betraying them;
+and from this discovery, there remained no doubt that Broglio would
+reinforce the Bastille the ensuing evening. It was therefore necessary
+to attack it that day; but before this could be done, it was first
+necessary to procure a better supply of arms than they were then
+possessed of.
+
+There was, adjoining to the city a large magazine of arms deposited at
+the Hospital of the Invalids, which the citizens summoned to surrender;
+and as the place was neither defensible, nor attempted much defence,
+they soon succeeded. Thus supplied, they marched to attack the Bastille;
+a vast mixed multitude of all ages, and of all degrees, armed with all
+sorts of weapons. Imagination would fail in describing to itself the
+appearance of such a procession, and of the anxiety of the events which
+a few hours or a few minutes might produce. What plans the ministry
+were forming, were as unknown to the people within the city, as what
+the citizens were doing was unknown to the ministry; and what movements
+Broglio might make for the support or relief of the place, were to the
+citizens equally as unknown. All was mystery and hazard.
+
+That the Bastille was attacked with an enthusiasm of heroism, such only
+as the highest animation of liberty could inspire, and carried in the
+space of a few hours, is an event which the world is fully possessed of.
+I am not undertaking the detail of the attack, but bringing into view
+the conspiracy against the nation which provoked it, and which fell
+with the Bastille. The prison to which the new ministry were dooming the
+National Assembly, in addition to its being the high altar and castle of
+despotism, became the proper object to begin with. This enterprise
+broke up the new ministry, who began now to fly from the ruin they had
+prepared for others. The troops of Broglio dispersed, and himself fled
+also.
+
+Mr. Burke has spoken a great deal about plots, but he has never once
+spoken of this plot against the National Assembly, and the liberties
+of the nation; and that he might not, he has passed over all the
+circumstances that might throw it in his way. The exiles who have fled
+from France, whose case he so much interests himself in, and from whom
+he has had his lesson, fled in consequence of the miscarriage of this
+plot. No plot was formed against them; they were plotting against
+others; and those who fell, met, not unjustly, the punishment they
+were preparing to execute. But will Mr. Burke say that if this plot,
+contrived with the subtilty of an ambuscade, had succeeded, the
+successful party would have restrained their wrath so soon? Let the
+history of all governments answer the question.
+
+Whom has the National Assembly brought to the scaffold? None. They
+were themselves the devoted victims of this plot, and they have not
+retaliated; why, then, are they charged with revenge they have not
+acted? In the tremendous breaking forth of a whole people, in which all
+degrees, tempers and characters are confounded, delivering themselves,
+by a miracle of exertion, from the destruction meditated against them,
+is it to be expected that nothing will happen? When men are sore with
+the sense of oppressions, and menaced with the prospects of new ones,
+is the calmness of philosophy or the palsy of insensibility to be looked
+for? Mr. Burke exclaims against outrage; yet the greatest is that which
+himself has committed. His book is a volume of outrage, not apologised
+for by the impulse of a moment, but cherished through a space of ten
+months; yet Mr. Burke had no provocation--no life, no interest, at
+stake.
+
+More of the citizens fell in this struggle than of their opponents: but
+four or five persons were seized by the populace, and instantly put to
+death; the Governor of the Bastille, and the Mayor of Paris, who was
+detected in the act of betraying them; and afterwards Foulon, one of the
+new ministry, and Berthier, his son-in-law, who had accepted the office
+of intendant of Paris. Their heads were stuck upon spikes, and carried
+about the city; and it is upon this mode of punishment that Mr. Burke
+builds a great part of his tragic scene. Let us therefore examine how
+men came by the idea of punishing in this manner.
+
+They learn it from the governments they live under; and retaliate the
+punishments they have been accustomed to behold. The heads stuck upon
+spikes, which remained for years upon Temple Bar, differed nothing in
+the horror of the scene from those carried about upon spikes at Paris;
+yet this was done by the English Government. It may perhaps be said that
+it signifies nothing to a man what is done to him after he is dead; but
+it signifies much to the living; it either tortures their feelings or
+hardens their hearts, and in either case it instructs them how to punish
+when power falls into their hands.
+
+Lay then the axe to the root, and teach governments humanity. It is
+their sanguinary punishments which corrupt mankind. In England the
+punishment in certain cases is by hanging, drawing and quartering;
+the heart of the sufferer is cut out and held up to the view of the
+populace. In France, under the former Government, the punishments were
+not less barbarous. Who does not remember the execution of Damien, torn
+to pieces by horses? The effect of those cruel spectacles exhibited to
+the populace is to destroy tenderness or excite revenge; and by the
+base and false idea of governing men by terror, instead of reason,
+they become precedents. It is over the lowest class of mankind that
+government by terror is intended to operate, and it is on them that it
+operates to the worst effect. They have sense enough to feel they are
+the objects aimed at; and they inflict in their turn the examples of
+terror they have been instructed to practise.
+
+There is in all European countries a large class of people of that
+description, which in England is called the "mob." Of this class were
+those who committed the burnings and devastations in London in 1780, and
+of this class were those who carried the heads on iron spikes in Paris.
+Foulon and Berthier were taken up in the country, and sent to Paris,
+to undergo their examination at the Hotel de Ville; for the National
+Assembly, immediately on the new ministry coming into office, passed a
+decree, which they communicated to the King and Cabinet, that they (the
+National Assembly) would hold the ministry, of which Foulon was one,
+responsible for the measures they were advising and pursuing; but the
+mob, incensed at the appearance of Foulon and Berthier, tore them from
+their conductors before they were carried to the Hotel de Ville, and
+executed them on the spot. Why then does Mr. Burke charge outrages
+of this kind on a whole people? As well may he charge the riots and
+outrages of 1780 on all the people of London, or those in Ireland on all
+his countrymen.
+
+But everything we see or hear offensive to our feelings and derogatory
+to the human character should lead to other reflections than those
+of reproach. Even the beings who commit them have some claim to our
+consideration. How then is it that such vast classes of mankind as are
+distinguished by the appellation of the vulgar, or the ignorant mob,
+are so numerous in all old countries? The instant we ask ourselves
+this question, reflection feels an answer. They rise, as an unavoidable
+consequence, out of the ill construction of all old governments in
+Europe, England included with the rest. It is by distortedly exalting
+some men, that others are distortedly debased, till the whole is out
+of nature. A vast mass of mankind are degradedly thrown into the
+back-ground of the human picture, to bring forward, with greater glare,
+the puppet-show of state and aristocracy. In the commencement of a
+revolution, those men are rather the followers of the camp than of the
+standard of liberty, and have yet to be instructed how to reverence it.
+
+I give to Mr. Burke all his theatrical exaggerations for facts, and I
+then ask him if they do not establish the certainty of what I here lay
+down? Admitting them to be true, they show the necessity of the French
+Revolution, as much as any one thing he could have asserted. These
+outrages were not the effect of the principles of the Revolution, but
+of the degraded mind that existed before the Revolution, and which the
+Revolution is calculated to reform. Place them then to their proper
+cause, and take the reproach of them to your own side.
+
+It is the honour of the National Assembly and the city of Paris that,
+during such a tremendous scene of arms and confusion, beyond the control
+of all authority, they have been able, by the influence of example
+and exhortation, to restrain so much. Never were more pains taken to
+instruct and enlighten mankind, and to make them see that their interest
+consisted in their virtue, and not in their revenge, than have been
+displayed in the Revolution of France. I now proceed to make some
+remarks on Mr. Burke's account of the expedition to Versailles, October
+the 5th and 6th.
+
+I can consider Mr. Burke's book in scarcely any other light than a
+dramatic performance; and he must, I think, have considered it in the
+same light himself, by the poetical liberties he has taken of omitting
+some facts, distorting others, and making the whole machinery bend to
+produce a stage effect. Of this kind is his account of the expedition to
+Versailles. He begins this account by omitting the only facts which as
+causes are known to be true; everything beyond these is conjecture, even
+in Paris; and he then works up a tale accommodated to his own passions
+and prejudices.
+
+It is to be observed throughout Mr. Burke's book that he never speaks
+of plots against the Revolution; and it is from those plots that all the
+mischiefs have arisen. It suits his purpose to exhibit the consequences
+without their causes. It is one of the arts of the drama to do so. If
+the crimes of men were exhibited with their sufferings, stage effect
+would sometimes be lost, and the audience would be inclined to approve
+where it was intended they should commiserate.
+
+After all the investigations that have been made into this intricate
+affair (the expedition to Versailles), it still remains enveloped in all
+that kind of mystery which ever accompanies events produced more from a
+concurrence of awkward circumstances than from fixed design. While the
+characters of men are forming, as is always the case in revolutions,
+there is a reciprocal suspicion, and a disposition to misinterpret each
+other; and even parties directly opposite in principle will sometimes
+concur in pushing forward the same movement with very different views,
+and with the hopes of its producing very different consequences. A great
+deal of this may be discovered in this embarrassed affair, and yet the
+issue of the whole was what nobody had in view.
+
+The only things certainly known are that considerable uneasiness was at
+this time excited at Paris by the delay of the King in not sanctioning
+and forwarding the decrees of the National Assembly, particularly that
+of the Declaration of the Rights of Man, and the decrees of the fourth
+of August, which contained the foundation principles on which the
+constitution was to be erected. The kindest, and perhaps the fairest
+conjecture upon this matter is, that some of the ministers intended to
+make remarks and observations upon certain parts of them before they
+were finally sanctioned and sent to the provinces; but be this as it
+may, the enemies of the Revolution derived hope from the delay, and the
+friends of the Revolution uneasiness.
+
+During this state of suspense, the Garde du Corps, which was composed as
+such regiments generally are, of persons much connected with the
+Court, gave an entertainment at Versailles (October 1) to some foreign
+regiments then arrived; and when the entertainment was at the height, on
+a signal given, the Garde du Corps tore the national cockade from their
+hats, trampled it under foot, and replaced it with a counter-cockade
+prepared for the purpose. An indignity of this kind amounted to
+defiance. It was like declaring war; and if men will give challenges
+they must expect consequences. But all this Mr. Burke has carefully kept
+out of sight. He begins his account by saying: "History will record that
+on the morning of the 6th October, 1789, the King and Queen of France,
+after a day of confusion, alarm, dismay, and slaughter, lay down under
+the pledged security of public faith to indulge nature in a few hours
+of respite, and troubled melancholy repose." This is neither the sober
+style of history, nor the intention of it. It leaves everything to
+be guessed at and mistaken. One would at least think there had been a
+battle; and a battle there probably would have been had it not been
+for the moderating prudence of those whom Mr. Burke involves in his
+censures. By his keeping the Garde du Corps out of sight Mr. Burke has
+afforded himself the dramatic licence of putting the King and Queen in
+their places, as if the object of the expedition was against them. But
+to return to my account this conduct of the Garde du Corps, as might
+well be expected, alarmed and enraged the Partisans. The colors of
+the cause, and the cause itself, were become too united to mistake the
+intention of the insult, and the Partisans were determined to call
+the Garde du Corps to an account. There was certainly nothing of the
+cowardice of assassination in marching in the face of the day to demand
+satisfaction, if such a phrase may be used, of a body of armed men who
+had voluntarily given defiance. But the circumstance which serves
+to throw this affair into embarrassment is, that the enemies of the
+Revolution appear to have encouraged it as well as its friends. The one
+hoped to prevent a civil war by checking it in time, and the other to
+make one. The hopes of those opposed to the Revolution rested in making
+the King of their party, and getting him from Versailles to Metz,
+where they expected to collect a force and set up a standard. We have,
+therefore, two different objects presenting themselves at the same time,
+and to be accomplished by the same means: the one to chastise the Garde
+du Corps, which was the object of the Partisans; the other to render the
+confusion of such a scene an inducement to the King to set off for Metz.
+
+On the 5th of October a very numerous body of women, and men in the
+disguise of women, collected around the Hotel de Ville or town-hall at
+Paris, and set off for Versailles. Their professed object was the Garde
+du Corps; but prudent men readily recollect that mischief is more easily
+begun than ended; and this impressed itself with the more force from the
+suspicions already stated, and the irregularity of such a cavalcade.
+As soon, therefore, as a sufficient force could be collected, M. de la
+Fayette, by orders from the civil authority of Paris, set off after
+them at the head of twenty thousand of the Paris militia. The Revolution
+could derive no benefit from confusion, and its opposers might. By an
+amiable and spirited manner of address he had hitherto been fortunate in
+calming disquietudes, and in this he was extraordinarily successful; to
+frustrate, therefore, the hopes of those who might seek to improve
+this scene into a sort of justifiable necessity for the King's quitting
+Versailles and withdrawing to Metz, and to prevent at the same time
+the consequences that might ensue between the Garde du Corps and this
+phalanx of men and women, he forwarded expresses to the King, that he
+was on his march to Versailles, by the orders of the civil authority of
+Paris, for the purpose of peace and protection, expressing at the same
+time the necessity of restraining the Garde du Corps from firing upon
+the people.*[3]
+
+He arrived at Versailles between ten and eleven at night. The Garde du
+Corps was drawn up, and the people had arrived some time before, but
+everything had remained suspended. Wisdom and policy now consisted in
+changing a scene of danger into a happy event. M. de la Fayette became
+the mediator between the enraged parties; and the King, to remove the
+uneasiness which had arisen from the delay already stated, sent for the
+President of the National Assembly, and signed the Declaration of the
+Rights of Man, and such other parts of the constitution as were in
+readiness.
+
+It was now about one in the morning. Everything appeared to be composed,
+and a general congratulation took place. By the beat of a drum a
+proclamation was made that the citizens of Versailles would give the
+hospitality of their houses to their fellow-citizens of Paris. Those
+who could not be accommodated in this manner remained in the streets, or
+took up their quarters in the churches; and at two o'clock the King and
+Queen retired.
+
+In this state matters passed till the break of day, when a fresh
+disturbance arose from the censurable conduct of some of both parties,
+for such characters there will be in all such scenes. One of the Garde
+du Corps appeared at one of the windows of the palace, and the people
+who had remained during the night in the streets accosted him with
+reviling and provocative language. Instead of retiring, as in such a
+case prudence would have dictated, he presented his musket, fired, and
+killed one of the Paris militia. The peace being thus broken, the people
+rushed into the palace in quest of the offender. They attacked the
+quarters of the Garde du Corps within the palace, and pursued them
+throughout the avenues of it, and to the apartments of the King. On this
+tumult, not the Queen only, as Mr. Burke has represented it, but every
+person in the palace, was awakened and alarmed; and M. de la Fayette had
+a second time to interpose between the parties, the event of which was
+that the Garde du Corps put on the national cockade, and the matter
+ended as by oblivion, after the loss of two or three lives.
+
+During the latter part of the time in which this confusion was acting,
+the King and Queen were in public at the balcony, and neither of them
+concealed for safety's sake, as Mr. Burke insinuates. Matters being thus
+appeased, and tranquility restored, a general acclamation broke forth of
+Le Roi a Paris--Le Roi a Paris--The King to Paris. It was the shout of
+peace, and immediately accepted on the part of the King. By this measure
+all future projects of trapanning the King to Metz, and setting up the
+standard of opposition to the constitution, were prevented, and the
+suspicions extinguished. The King and his family reached Paris in the
+evening, and were congratulated on their arrival by M. Bailly, the Mayor
+of Paris, in the name of the citizens. Mr. Burke, who throughout his
+book confounds things, persons, and principles, as in his remarks on
+M. Bailly's address, confounded time also. He censures M. Bailly for
+calling it "un bon jour," a good day. Mr. Burke should have informed
+himself that this scene took up the space of two days, the day on which
+it began with every appearance of danger and mischief, and the day on
+which it terminated without the mischiefs that threatened; and that
+it is to this peaceful termination that M. Bailly alludes, and to the
+arrival of the King at Paris. Not less than three hundred thousand
+persons arranged themselves in the procession from Versailles to Paris,
+and not an act of molestation was committed during the whole march.
+
+Mr. Burke on the authority of M. Lally Tollendal, a deserter from the
+National Assembly, says that on entering Paris, the people shouted "Tous
+les eveques a la lanterne." All Bishops to be hanged at the lanthorn
+or lamp-posts. It is surprising that nobody could hear this but Lally
+Tollendal, and that nobody should believe it but Mr. Burke. It has not
+the least connection with any part of the transaction, and is totally
+foreign to every circumstance of it. The Bishops had never been
+introduced before into any scene of Mr. Burke's drama: why then are
+they, all at once, and altogether, tout a coup, et tous ensemble,
+introduced now? Mr. Burke brings forward his Bishops and his
+lanthorn-like figures in a magic lanthorn, and raises his scenes by
+contrast instead of connection. But it serves to show, with the rest of
+his book what little credit ought to be given where even probability is
+set at defiance, for the purpose of defaming; and with this reflection,
+instead of a soliloquy in praise of chivalry, as Mr. Burke has done, I
+close the account of the expedition to Versailles.*[4]
+
+I have now to follow Mr. Burke through a pathless wilderness of
+rhapsodies, and a sort of descant upon governments, in which he asserts
+whatever he pleases, on the presumption of its being believed, without
+offering either evidence or reasons for so doing.
+
+Before anything can be reasoned upon to a conclusion, certain facts,
+principles, or data, to reason from, must be established, admitted, or
+denied. Mr. Burke with his usual outrage, abused the Declaration of
+the Rights of Man, published by the National Assembly of France, as
+the basis on which the constitution of France is built. This he calls
+"paltry and blurred sheets of paper about the rights of man." Does Mr.
+Burke mean to deny that man has any rights? If he does, then he must
+mean that there are no such things as rights anywhere, and that he has
+none himself; for who is there in the world but man? But if Mr. Burke
+means to admit that man has rights, the question then will be: What are
+those rights, and how man came by them originally?
+
+The error of those who reason by precedents drawn from antiquity,
+respecting the rights of man, is that they do not go far enough into
+antiquity. They do not go the whole way. They stop in some of the
+intermediate stages of an hundred or a thousand years, and produce what
+was then done, as a rule for the present day. This is no authority at
+all. If we travel still farther into antiquity, we shall find a direct
+contrary opinion and practice prevailing; and if antiquity is to be
+authority, a thousand such authorities may be produced, successively
+contradicting each other; but if we proceed on, we shall at last come
+out right; we shall come to the time when man came from the hand of his
+Maker. What was he then? Man. Man was his high and only title, and a
+higher cannot be given him. But of titles I shall speak hereafter.
+
+We are now got at the origin of man, and at the origin of his rights.
+As to the manner in which the world has been governed from that day to
+this, it is no farther any concern of ours than to make a proper use of
+the errors or the improvements which the history of it presents. Those
+who lived an hundred or a thousand years ago, were then moderns, as we
+are now. They had their ancients, and those ancients had others, and we
+also shall be ancients in our turn. If the mere name of antiquity is to
+govern in the affairs of life, the people who are to live an hundred or
+a thousand years hence, may as well take us for a precedent, as we make
+a precedent of those who lived an hundred or a thousand years ago. The
+fact is, that portions of antiquity, by proving everything, establish
+nothing. It is authority against authority all the way, till we come
+to the divine origin of the rights of man at the creation. Here our
+enquiries find a resting-place, and our reason finds a home. If a
+dispute about the rights of man had arisen at the distance of an hundred
+years from the creation, it is to this source of authority they must
+have referred, and it is to this same source of authority that we must
+now refer.
+
+Though I mean not to touch upon any sectarian principle of religion,
+yet it may be worth observing, that the genealogy of Christ is traced
+to Adam. Why then not trace the rights of man to the creation of man? I
+will answer the question. Because there have been upstart governments,
+thrusting themselves between, and presumptuously working to un-make man.
+
+If any generation of men ever possessed the right of dictating the
+mode by which the world should be governed for ever, it was the
+first generation that existed; and if that generation did it not, no
+succeeding generation can show any authority for doing it, nor can set
+any up. The illuminating and divine principle of the equal rights of man
+(for it has its origin from the Maker of man) relates, not only to the
+living individuals, but to generations of men succeeding each other.
+Every generation is equal in rights to generations which preceded it,
+by the same rule that every individual is born equal in rights with his
+contemporary.
+
+Every history of the creation, and every traditionary account, whether
+from the lettered or unlettered world, however they may vary in their
+opinion or belief of certain particulars, all agree in establishing one
+point, the unity of man; by which I mean that men are all of one degree,
+and consequently that all men are born equal, and with equal natural
+right, in the same manner as if posterity had been continued by creation
+instead of generation, the latter being the only mode by which the
+former is carried forward; and consequently every child born into the
+world must be considered as deriving its existence from God. The world
+is as new to him as it was to the first man that existed, and his
+natural right in it is of the same kind.
+
+The Mosaic account of the creation, whether taken as divine authority or
+merely historical, is full to this point, the unity or equality of man.
+The expression admits of no controversy. "And God said, Let us make man
+in our own image. In the image of God created he him; male and female
+created he them." The distinction of sexes is pointed out, but no other
+distinction is even implied. If this be not divine authority, it is at
+least historical authority, and shows that the equality of man, so far
+from being a modern doctrine, is the oldest upon record.
+
+It is also to be observed that all the religions known in the world are
+founded, so far as they relate to man, on the unity of man, as being all
+of one degree. Whether in heaven or in hell, or in whatever state man
+may be supposed to exist hereafter, the good and the bad are the only
+distinctions. Nay, even the laws of governments are obliged to slide
+into this principle, by making degrees to consist in crimes and not in
+persons.
+
+It is one of the greatest of all truths, and of the highest advantage to
+cultivate. By considering man in this light, and by instructing him to
+consider himself in this light, it places him in a close connection with
+all his duties, whether to his Creator or to the creation, of which he
+is a part; and it is only when he forgets his origin, or, to use a more
+fashionable phrase, his birth and family, that he becomes dissolute. It
+is not among the least of the evils of the present existing governments
+in all parts of Europe that man, considered as man, is thrown back to a
+vast distance from his Maker, and the artificial chasm filled up with a
+succession of barriers, or sort of turnpike gates, through which he has
+to pass. I will quote Mr. Burke's catalogue of barriers that he has
+set up between man and his Maker. Putting himself in the character of a
+herald, he says: "We fear God--we look with awe to kings--with affection
+to Parliaments with duty to magistrates--with reverence to priests,
+and with respect to nobility." Mr. Burke has forgotten to put in
+"'chivalry." He has also forgotten to put in Peter.
+
+The duty of man is not a wilderness of turnpike gates, through which he
+is to pass by tickets from one to the other. It is plain and simple, and
+consists but of two points. His duty to God, which every man must feel;
+and with respect to his neighbor, to do as he would be done by. If those
+to whom power is delegated do well, they will be respected: if not,
+they will be despised; and with regard to those to whom no power is
+delegated, but who assume it, the rational world can know nothing of
+them.
+
+Hitherto we have spoken only (and that but in part) of the natural
+rights of man. We have now to consider the civil rights of man, and
+to show how the one originates from the other. Man did not enter into
+society to become worse than he was before, nor to have fewer rights
+than he had before, but to have those rights better secured. His natural
+rights are the foundation of all his civil rights. But in order to
+pursue this distinction with more precision, it will be necessary to
+mark the different qualities of natural and civil rights.
+
+A few words will explain this. Natural rights are those which appertain
+to man in right of his existence. Of this kind are all the intellectual
+rights, or rights of the mind, and also all those rights of acting as an
+individual for his own comfort and happiness, which are not injurious to
+the natural rights of others. Civil rights are those which appertain to
+man in right of his being a member of society. Every civil right has for
+its foundation some natural right pre-existing in the individual, but
+to the enjoyment of which his individual power is not, in all cases,
+sufficiently competent. Of this kind are all those which relate to
+security and protection.
+
+From this short review it will be easy to distinguish between that class
+of natural rights which man retains after entering into society and
+those which he throws into the common stock as a member of society.
+
+The natural rights which he retains are all those in which the Power to
+execute is as perfect in the individual as the right itself. Among
+this class, as is before mentioned, are all the intellectual rights, or
+rights of the mind; consequently religion is one of those rights. The
+natural rights which are not retained, are all those in which, though
+the right is perfect in the individual, the power to execute them is
+defective. They answer not his purpose. A man, by natural right, has a
+right to judge in his own cause; and so far as the right of the mind is
+concerned, he never surrenders it. But what availeth it him to judge,
+if he has not power to redress? He therefore deposits this right in the
+common stock of society, and takes the ann of society, of which he is
+a part, in preference and in addition to his own. Society grants him
+nothing. Every man is a proprietor in society, and draws on the capital
+as a matter of right.
+
+From these premisses two or three certain conclusions will follow:
+
+First, That every civil right grows out of a natural right; or, in other
+words, is a natural right exchanged.
+
+Secondly, That civil power properly considered as such is made up of
+the aggregate of that class of the natural rights of man, which becomes
+defective in the individual in point of power, and answers not his
+purpose, but when collected to a focus becomes competent to the Purpose
+of every one.
+
+Thirdly, That the power produced from the aggregate of natural rights,
+imperfect in power in the individual, cannot be applied to invade the
+natural rights which are retained in the individual, and in which the
+power to execute is as perfect as the right itself.
+
+We have now, in a few words, traced man from a natural individual to a
+member of society, and shown, or endeavoured to show, the quality of
+the natural rights retained, and of those which are exchanged for civil
+rights. Let us now apply these principles to governments.
+
+In casting our eyes over the world, it is extremely easy to distinguish
+the governments which have arisen out of society, or out of the social
+compact, from those which have not; but to place this in a clearer light
+than what a single glance may afford, it will be proper to take a review
+of the several sources from which governments have arisen and on which
+they have been founded.
+
+They may be all comprehended under three heads.
+
+First, Superstition.
+
+Secondly, Power.
+
+Thirdly, The common interest of society and the common rights of man.
+
+The first was a government of priestcraft, the second of conquerors, and
+the third of reason.
+
+When a set of artful men pretended, through the medium of oracles, to
+hold intercourse with the Deity, as familiarly as they now march up
+the back-stairs in European courts, the world was completely under the
+government of superstition. The oracles were consulted, and whatever
+they were made to say became the law; and this sort of government lasted
+as long as this sort of superstition lasted.
+
+After these a race of conquerors arose, whose government, like that of
+William the Conqueror, was founded in power, and the sword assumed the
+name of a sceptre. Governments thus established last as long as the
+power to support them lasts; but that they might avail themselves of
+every engine in their favor, they united fraud to force, and set up
+an idol which they called Divine Right, and which, in imitation of the
+Pope, who affects to be spiritual and temporal, and in contradiction to
+the Founder of the Christian religion, twisted itself afterwards into an
+idol of another shape, called Church and State. The key of St. Peter
+and the key of the Treasury became quartered on one another, and the
+wondering cheated multitude worshipped the invention.
+
+When I contemplate the natural dignity of man, when I feel (for Nature
+has not been kind enough to me to blunt my feelings) for the honour and
+happiness of its character, I become irritated at the attempt to govern
+mankind by force and fraud, as if they were all knaves and fools, and
+can scarcely avoid disgust at those who are thus imposed upon.
+
+We have now to review the governments which arise out of society, in
+contradistinction to those which arose out of superstition and conquest.
+
+It has been thought a considerable advance towards establishing the
+principles of Freedom to say that Government is a compact between those
+who govern and those who are governed; but this cannot be true, because
+it is putting the effect before the cause; for as man must have
+existed before governments existed, there necessarily was a time when
+governments did not exist, and consequently there could originally exist
+no governors to form such a compact with.
+
+The fact therefore must be that the individuals themselves, each in his
+own personal and sovereign right, entered into a compact with each other
+to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments
+have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right
+to exist.
+
+To possess ourselves of a clear idea of what government is, or ought
+to be, we must trace it to its origin. In doing this we shall easily
+discover that governments must have arisen either out of the people
+or over the people. Mr. Burke has made no distinction. He investigates
+nothing to its source, and therefore he confounds everything; but he has
+signified his intention of undertaking, at some future opportunity, a
+comparison between the constitution of England and France. As he thus
+renders it a subject of controversy by throwing the gauntlet, I take him
+upon his own ground. It is in high challenges that high truths have the
+right of appearing; and I accept it with the more readiness because it
+affords me, at the same time, an opportunity of pursuing the subject
+with respect to governments arising out of society.
+
+But it will be first necessary to define what is meant by a
+Constitution. It is not sufficient that we adopt the word; we must fix
+also a standard signification to it.
+
+A constitution is not a thing in name only, but in fact. It has not an
+ideal, but a real existence; and wherever it cannot be produced in a
+visible form, there is none. A constitution is a thing antecedent to a
+government, and a government is only the creature of a constitution. The
+constitution of a country is not the act of its government, but of the
+people constituting its government. It is the body of elements, to which
+you can refer, and quote article by article; and which contains the
+principles on which the government shall be established, the manner
+in which it shall be organised, the powers it shall have, the mode
+of elections, the duration of Parliaments, or by what other name
+such bodies may be called; the powers which the executive part of the
+government shall have; and in fine, everything that relates to the
+complete organisation of a civil government, and the principles on which
+it shall act, and by which it shall be bound. A constitution, therefore,
+is to a government what the laws made afterwards by that government
+are to a court of judicature. The court of judicature does not make the
+laws, neither can it alter them; it only acts in conformity to the laws
+made: and the government is in like manner governed by the constitution.
+
+Can, then, Mr. Burke produce the English Constitution? If he cannot,
+we may fairly conclude that though it has been so much talked about, no
+such thing as a constitution exists, or ever did exist, and consequently
+that the people have yet a constitution to form.
+
+Mr. Burke will not, I presume, deny the position I have already
+advanced--namely, that governments arise either out of the people or
+over the people. The English Government is one of those which arose out
+of a conquest, and not out of society, and consequently it arose over
+the people; and though it has been much modified from the opportunity of
+circumstances since the time of William the Conqueror, the country has
+never yet regenerated itself, and is therefore without a constitution.
+
+I readily perceive the reason why Mr. Burke declined going into the
+comparison between the English and French constitutions, because he
+could not but perceive, when he sat down to the task, that no such a
+thing as a constitution existed on his side the question. His book
+is certainly bulky enough to have contained all he could say on this
+subject, and it would have been the best manner in which people could
+have judged of their separate merits. Why then has he declined the only
+thing that was worth while to write upon? It was the strongest ground he
+could take, if the advantages were on his side, but the weakest if they
+were not; and his declining to take it is either a sign that he could
+not possess it or could not maintain it.
+
+Mr. Burke said, in a speech last winter in Parliament, "that when the
+National Assembly first met in three Orders (the Tiers Etat, the Clergy,
+and the Noblesse), France had then a good constitution." This shows,
+among numerous other instances, that Mr. Burke does not understand what
+a constitution is. The persons so met were not a constitution, but a
+convention, to make a constitution.
+
+The present National Assembly of France is, strictly speaking, the
+personal social compact. The members of it are the delegates of
+the nation in its original character; future assemblies will be the
+delegates of the nation in its organised character. The authority of
+the present Assembly is different from what the authority of future
+Assemblies will be. The authority of the present one is to form a
+constitution; the authority of future assemblies will be to legislate
+according to the principles and forms prescribed in that constitution;
+and if experience should hereafter show that alterations, amendments,
+or additions are necessary, the constitution will point out the mode by
+which such things shall be done, and not leave it to the discretionary
+power of the future government.
+
+A government on the principles on which constitutional governments
+arising out of society are established, cannot have the right of
+altering itself. If it had, it would be arbitrary. It might make itself
+what it pleased; and wherever such a right is set up, it shows there
+is no constitution. The act by which the English Parliament empowered
+itself to sit seven years, shows there is no constitution in England. It
+might, by the same self-authority, have sat any great number of years,
+or for life. The bill which the present Mr. Pitt brought into Parliament
+some years ago, to reform Parliament, was on the same erroneous
+principle. The right of reform is in the nation in its original
+character, and the constitutional method would be by a general
+convention elected for the purpose. There is, moreover, a paradox in the
+idea of vitiated bodies reforming themselves.
+
+From these preliminaries I proceed to draw some comparisons. I have
+already spoken of the declaration of rights; and as I mean to be as
+concise as possible, I shall proceed to other parts of the French
+Constitution.
+
+The constitution of France says that every man who pays a tax of sixty
+sous per annum (2s. 6d. English) is an elector. What article will Mr.
+Burke place against this? Can anything be more limited, and at the same
+time more capricious, than the qualification of electors is in England?
+Limited--because not one man in an hundred (I speak much within compass)
+is admitted to vote. Capricious--because the lowest character that can
+be supposed to exist, and who has not so much as the visible means of an
+honest livelihood, is an elector in some places: while in other places,
+the man who pays very large taxes, and has a known fair character, and
+the farmer who rents to the amount of three or four hundred pounds a
+year, with a property on that farm to three or four times that amount,
+is not admitted to be an elector. Everything is out of nature, as Mr.
+Burke says on another occasion, in this strange chaos, and all sorts of
+follies are blended with all sorts of crimes. William the Conqueror and
+his descendants parcelled out the country in this manner, and bribed
+some parts of it by what they call charters to hold the other parts of
+it the better subjected to their will. This is the reason why so many
+of those charters abound in Cornwall; the people were averse to the
+Government established at the Conquest, and the towns were garrisoned
+and bribed to enslave the country. All the old charters are the badges
+of this conquest, and it is from this source that the capriciousness of
+election arises.
+
+The French Constitution says that the number of representatives for
+any place shall be in a ratio to the number of taxable inhabitants or
+electors. What article will Mr. Burke place against this? The county
+of York, which contains nearly a million of souls, sends two county
+members; and so does the county of Rutland, which contains not an
+hundredth part of that number. The old town of Sarum, which contains
+not three houses, sends two members; and the town of Manchester, which
+contains upward of sixty thousand souls, is not admitted to send any.
+Is there any principle in these things? It is admitted that all this
+is altered, but there is much to be done yet, before we have a fair
+representation of the people. Is there anything by which you can trace
+the marks of freedom, or discover those of wisdom? No wonder then Mr.
+Burke has declined the comparison, and endeavored to lead his readers
+from the point by a wild, unsystematical display of paradoxical
+rhapsodies.
+
+The French Constitution says that the National Assembly shall be elected
+every two years. What article will Mr. Burke place against this? Why,
+that the nation has no right at all in the case; that the government is
+perfectly arbitrary with respect to this point; and he can quote for his
+authority the precedent of a former Parliament.
+
+The French Constitution says there shall be no game laws, that the
+farmer on whose lands wild game shall be found (for it is by the produce
+of his lands they are fed) shall have a right to what he can take; that
+there shall be no monopolies of any kind--that all trades shall be free
+and every man free to follow any occupation by which he can procure
+an honest livelihood, and in any place, town, or city throughout the
+nation. What will Mr. Burke say to this? In England, game is made the
+property of those at whose expense it is not fed; and with respect to
+monopolies, the country is cut up into monopolies. Every chartered
+town is an aristocratical monopoly in itself, and the qualification of
+electors proceeds out of those chartered monopolies. Is this freedom? Is
+this what Mr. Burke means by a constitution?
+
+In these chartered monopolies, a man coming from another part of the
+country is hunted from them as if he were a foreign enemy. An Englishman
+is not free of his own country; every one of those places presents a
+barrier in his way, and tells him he is not a freeman--that he has no
+rights. Within these monopolies are other monopolies. In a city, such
+for instance as Bath, which contains between twenty and thirty thousand
+inhabitants, the right of electing representatives to Parliament is
+monopolised by about thirty-one persons. And within these monopolies
+are still others. A man even of the same town, whose parents were not
+in circumstances to give him an occupation, is debarred, in many cases,
+from the natural right of acquiring one, be his genius or industry what
+it may.
+
+Are these things examples to hold out to a country regenerating itself
+from slavery, like France? Certainly they are not, and certain am I,
+that when the people of England come to reflect upon them they will,
+like France, annihilate those badges of ancient oppression, those traces
+of a conquered nation. Had Mr. Burke possessed talents similar to the
+author of "On the Wealth of Nations." he would have comprehended all
+the parts which enter into, and, by assemblage, form a constitution.
+He would have reasoned from minutiae to magnitude. It is not from his
+prejudices only, but from the disorderly cast of his genius, that he is
+unfitted for the subject he writes upon. Even his genius is without a
+constitution. It is a genius at random, and not a genius constituted.
+But he must say something. He has therefore mounted in the air like a
+balloon, to draw the eyes of the multitude from the ground they stand
+upon.
+
+Much is to be learned from the French Constitution. Conquest and tyranny
+transplanted themselves with William the Conqueror from Normandy into
+England, and the country is yet disfigured with the marks. May, then,
+the example of all France contribute to regenerate the freedom which a
+province of it destroyed!
+
+The French Constitution says that to preserve the national
+representation from being corrupt, no member of the National Assembly
+shall be an officer of the government, a placeman or a pensioner. What
+will Mr. Burke place against this? I will whisper his answer: Loaves and
+Fishes. Ah! this government of loaves and fishes has more mischief in
+it than people have yet reflected on. The National Assembly has made the
+discovery, and it holds out the example to the world. Had governments
+agreed to quarrel on purpose to fleece their countries by taxes, they
+could not have succeeded better than they have done.
+
+Everything in the English government appears to me the reverse of
+what it ought to be, and of what it is said to be. The Parliament,
+imperfectly and capriciously elected as it is, is nevertheless supposed
+to hold the national purse in trust for the nation; but in the manner in
+which an English Parliament is constructed it is like a man being both
+mortgagor and mortgagee, and in the case of misapplication of trust it
+is the criminal sitting in judgment upon himself. If those who vote the
+supplies are the same persons who receive the supplies when voted, and
+are to account for the expenditure of those supplies to those who voted
+them, it is themselves accountable to themselves, and the Comedy of
+Errors concludes with the pantomime of Hush. Neither the Ministerial
+party nor the Opposition will touch upon this case. The national purse
+is the common hack which each mounts upon. It is like what the country
+people call "Ride and tie--you ride a little way, and then I."*[5] They
+order these things better in France.
+
+The French Constitution says that the right of war and peace is in the
+nation. Where else should it reside but in those who are to pay the
+expense?
+
+In England this right is said to reside in a metaphor shown at the Tower
+for sixpence or a shilling a piece: so are the lions; and it would be
+a step nearer to reason to say it resided in them, for any inanimate
+metaphor is no more than a hat or a cap. We can all see the absurdity of
+worshipping Aaron's molten calf, or Nebuchadnezzar's golden image; but
+why do men continue to practise themselves the absurdities they despise
+in others?
+
+It may with reason be said that in the manner the English nation is
+represented it signifies not where the right resides, whether in the
+Crown or in the Parliament. War is the common harvest of all those who
+participate in the division and expenditure of public money, in all
+countries. It is the art of conquering at home; the object of it is an
+increase of revenue; and as revenue cannot be increased without taxes,
+a pretence must be made for expenditure. In reviewing the history of the
+English Government, its wars and its taxes, a bystander, not blinded
+by prejudice nor warped by interest, would declare that taxes were not
+raised to carry on wars, but that wars were raised to carry on taxes.
+
+Mr. Burke, as a member of the House of Commons, is a part of the English
+Government; and though he professes himself an enemy to war, he abuses
+the French Constitution, which seeks to explode it. He holds up the
+English Government as a model, in all its parts, to France; but he
+should first know the remarks which the French make upon it. They
+contend in favor of their own, that the portion of liberty enjoyed in
+England is just enough to enslave a country more productively than by
+despotism, and that as the real object of all despotism is revenue,
+a government so formed obtains more than it could do either by direct
+despotism, or in a full state of freedom, and is, therefore on the
+ground of interest, opposed to both. They account also for the readiness
+which always appears in such governments for engaging in wars by
+remarking on the different motives which produced them. In despotic
+governments wars are the effect of pride; but in those governments in
+which they become the means of taxation, they acquire thereby a more
+permanent promptitude.
+
+The French Constitution, therefore, to provide against both these evils,
+has taken away the power of declaring war from kings and ministers, and
+placed the right where the expense must fall.
+
+When the question of the right of war and peace was agitating in the
+National Assembly, the people of England appeared to be much interested
+in the event, and highly to applaud the decision. As a principle it
+applies as much to one country as another. William the Conqueror, as
+a conqueror, held this power of war and peace in himself, and his
+descendants have ever since claimed it under him as a right.
+
+Although Mr. Burke has asserted the right of the Parliament at the
+Revolution to bind and control the nation and posterity for ever, he
+denies at the same time that the Parliament or the nation had any right
+to alter what he calls the succession of the crown in anything but in
+part, or by a sort of modification. By his taking this ground he throws
+the case back to the Norman Conquest, and by thus running a line of
+succession springing from William the Conqueror to the present day, he
+makes it necessary to enquire who and what William the Conqueror was,
+and where he came from, and into the origin, history and nature of what
+are called prerogatives. Everything must have had a beginning, and the
+fog of time and antiquity should be penetrated to discover it. Let,
+then, Mr. Burke bring forward his William of Normandy, for it is to this
+origin that his argument goes. It also unfortunately happens, in running
+this line of succession, that another line parallel thereto presents
+itself, which is that if the succession runs in the line of the
+conquest, the nation runs in the line of being conquered, and it ought
+to rescue itself from this reproach.
+
+But it will perhaps be said that though the power of declaring war
+descends in the heritage of the conquest, it is held in check by the
+right of Parliament to withhold the supplies. It will always happen when
+a thing is originally wrong that amendments do not make it right, and it
+often happens that they do as much mischief one way as good the other,
+and such is the case here, for if the one rashly declares war as a
+matter of right, and the other peremptorily withholds the supplies as a
+matter of right, the remedy becomes as bad, or worse, than the disease.
+The one forces the nation to a combat, and the other ties its hands;
+but the more probable issue is that the contest will end in a collusion
+between the parties, and be made a screen to both.
+
+On this question of war, three things are to be considered. First, the
+right of declaring it: secondly, the expense of supporting it: thirdly,
+the mode of conducting it after it is declared. The French Constitution
+places the right where the expense must fall, and this union can only
+be in the nation. The mode of conducting it after it is declared,
+it consigns to the executive department. Were this the case in all
+countries, we should hear but little more of wars.
+
+Before I proceed to consider other parts of the French Constitution,
+and by way of relieving the fatigue of argument, I will introduce an
+anecdote which I had from Dr. Franklin.
+
+While the Doctor resided in France as Minister from America, during
+the war, he had numerous proposals made to him by projectors of every
+country and of every kind, who wished to go to the land that floweth
+with milk and honey, America; and among the rest, there was one who
+offered himself to be king. He introduced his proposal to the Doctor by
+letter, which is now in the hands of M. Beaumarchais, of Paris--stating,
+first, that as the Americans had dismissed or sent away*[6] their King,
+that they would want another. Secondly, that himself was a Norman.
+Thirdly, that he was of a more ancient family than the Dukes of
+Normandy, and of a more honorable descent, his line having never been
+bastardised. Fourthly, that there was already a precedent in England of
+kings coming out of Normandy, and on these grounds he rested his offer,
+enjoining that the Doctor would forward it to America. But as the Doctor
+neither did this, nor yet sent him an answer, the projector wrote a
+second letter, in which he did not, it is true, threaten to go over and
+conquer America, but only with great dignity proposed that if his offer
+was not accepted, an acknowledgment of about L30,000 might be made to
+him for his generosity! Now, as all arguments respecting succession must
+necessarily connect that succession with some beginning, Mr. Burke's
+arguments on this subject go to show that there is no English origin of
+kings, and that they are descendants of the Norman line in right of the
+Conquest. It may, therefore, be of service to his doctrine to make this
+story known, and to inform him, that in case of that natural extinction
+to which all mortality is subject, Kings may again be had from Normandy,
+on more reasonable terms than William the Conqueror; and consequently,
+that the good people of England, at the revolution of 1688, might have
+done much better, had such a generous Norman as this known their wants,
+and they had known his. The chivalric character which Mr. Burke so much
+admires, is certainly much easier to make a bargain with than a hard
+dealing Dutchman. But to return to the matters of the constitution: The
+French Constitution says, There shall be no titles; and, of consequence,
+all that class of equivocal generation which in some countries is called
+"aristocracy" and in others "nobility," is done away, and the peer is
+exalted into the Man.
+
+Titles are but nicknames, and every nickname is a title. The thing is
+perfectly harmless in itself, but it marks a sort of foppery in the
+human character, which degrades it. It reduces man into the diminutive
+of man in things which are great, and the counterfeit of women in things
+which are little. It talks about its fine blue ribbon like a girl, and
+shows its new garter like a child. A certain writer, of some antiquity,
+says: "When I was a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a
+man, I put away childish things."
+
+It is, properly, from the elevated mind of France that the folly of
+titles has fallen. It has outgrown the baby clothes of Count and Duke,
+and breeched itself in manhood. France has not levelled, it has exalted.
+It has put down the dwarf, to set up the man. The punyism of a senseless
+word like Duke, Count or Earl has ceased to please. Even those who
+possessed them have disowned the gibberish, and as they outgrew the
+rickets, have despised the rattle. The genuine mind of man, thirsting
+for its native home, society, contemns the gewgaws that separate him
+from it. Titles are like circles drawn by the magician's wand, to
+contract the sphere of man's felicity. He lives immured within the
+Bastille of a word, and surveys at a distance the envied life of man.
+
+Is it, then, any wonder that titles should fall in France? Is it not a
+greater wonder that they should be kept up anywhere? What are they? What
+is their worth, and "what is their amount?" When we think or speak of
+a Judge or a General, we associate with it the ideas of office and
+character; we think of gravity in one and bravery in the other; but when
+we use the word merely as a title, no ideas associate with it. Through
+all the vocabulary of Adam there is not such an animal as a Duke or a
+Count; neither can we connect any certain ideas with the words. Whether
+they mean strength or weakness, wisdom or folly, a child or a man, or
+the rider or the horse, is all equivocal. What respect then can be paid
+to that which describes nothing, and which means nothing? Imagination
+has given figure and character to centaurs, satyrs, and down to all
+the fairy tribe; but titles baffle even the powers of fancy, and are a
+chimerical nondescript.
+
+But this is not all. If a whole country is disposed to hold them in
+contempt, all their value is gone, and none will own them. It is
+common opinion only that makes them anything, or nothing, or worse
+than nothing. There is no occasion to take titles away, for they take
+themselves away when society concurs to ridicule them. This species of
+imaginary consequence has visibly declined in every part of Europe, and
+it hastens to its exit as the world of reason continues to rise. There
+was a time when the lowest class of what are called nobility was more
+thought of than the highest is now, and when a man in armour riding
+throughout Christendom in quest of adventures was more stared at than
+a modern Duke. The world has seen this folly fall, and it has fallen
+by being laughed at, and the farce of titles will follow its fate. The
+patriots of France have discovered in good time that rank and dignity in
+society must take a new ground. The old one has fallen through. It must
+now take the substantial ground of character, instead of the chimerical
+ground of titles; and they have brought their titles to the altar, and
+made of them a burnt-offering to Reason.
+
+If no mischief had annexed itself to the folly of titles they would not
+have been worth a serious and formal destruction, such as the National
+Assembly have decreed them; and this makes it necessary to enquire
+farther into the nature and character of aristocracy.
+
+That, then, which is called aristocracy in some countries and nobility
+in others arose out of the governments founded upon conquest. It was
+originally a military order for the purpose of supporting military
+government (for such were all governments founded in conquest); and
+to keep up a succession of this order for the purpose for which it
+was established, all the younger branches of those families were
+disinherited and the law of primogenitureship set up.
+
+The nature and character of aristocracy shows itself to us in this law.
+It is the law against every other law of nature, and Nature herself
+calls for its destruction. Establish family justice, and aristocracy
+falls. By the aristocratical law of primogenitureship, in a family
+of six children five are exposed. Aristocracy has never more than one
+child. The rest are begotten to be devoured. They are thrown to the
+cannibal for prey, and the natural parent prepares the unnatural repast.
+
+As everything which is out of nature in man affects, more or less,
+the interest of society, so does this. All the children which the
+aristocracy disowns (which are all except the eldest) are, in general,
+cast like orphans on a parish, to be provided for by the public, but
+at a greater charge. Unnecessary offices and places in governments and
+courts are created at the expense of the public to maintain them.
+
+With what kind of parental reflections can the father or mother
+contemplate their younger offspring? By nature they are children, and
+by marriage they are heirs; but by aristocracy they are bastards and
+orphans. They are the flesh and blood of their parents in the one line,
+and nothing akin to them in the other. To restore, therefore, parents to
+their children, and children to their parents relations to each other,
+and man to society--and to exterminate the monster aristocracy, root
+and branch--the French Constitution has destroyed the law of
+Primogenitureship. Here then lies the monster; and Mr. Burke, if he
+pleases, may write its epitaph.
+
+Hitherto we have considered aristocracy chiefly in one point of view.
+We have now to consider it in another. But whether we view it before or
+behind, or sideways, or any way else, domestically or publicly, it is
+still a monster.
+
+In France aristocracy had one feature less in its countenance than what
+it has in some other countries. It did not compose a body of hereditary
+legislators. It was not "a corporation of aristocracy," for such I have
+heard M. de la Fayette describe an English House of Peers. Let us then
+examine the grounds upon which the French Constitution has resolved
+against having such a House in France.
+
+Because, in the first place, as is already mentioned, aristocracy is
+kept up by family tyranny and injustice.
+
+Secondly. Because there is an unnatural unfitness in an aristocracy to
+be legislators for a nation. Their ideas of distributive justice are
+corrupted at the very source. They begin life by trampling on all their
+younger brothers and sisters, and relations of every kind, and are
+taught and educated so to do. With what ideas of justice or honour can
+that man enter a house of legislation, who absorbs in his own person
+the inheritance of a whole family of children or doles out to them some
+pitiful portion with the insolence of a gift?
+
+Thirdly. Because the idea of hereditary legislators is as inconsistent
+as that of hereditary judges, or hereditary juries; and as absurd as an
+hereditary mathematician, or an hereditary wise man; and as ridiculous
+as an hereditary poet laureate.
+
+Fourthly. Because a body of men, holding themselves accountable to
+nobody, ought not to be trusted by anybody.
+
+Fifthly. Because it is continuing the uncivilised principle of
+governments founded in conquest, and the base idea of man having
+property in man, and governing him by personal right.
+
+Sixthly. Because aristocracy has a tendency to deteriorate the human
+species. By the universal economy of nature it is known, and by the
+instance of the Jews it is proved, that the human species has a tendency
+to degenerate, in any small number of persons, when separated from the
+general stock of society, and inter-marrying constantly with each other.
+It defeats even its pretended end, and becomes in time the opposite of
+what is noble in man. Mr. Burke talks of nobility; let him show what
+it is. The greatest characters the world have known have arisen on the
+democratic floor. Aristocracy has not been able to keep a proportionate
+pace with democracy. The artificial Noble shrinks into a dwarf before
+the Noble of Nature; and in the few instances of those (for there are
+some in all countries) in whom nature, as by a miracle, has survived in
+aristocracy, Those Men Despise It.--But it is time to proceed to a new
+subject.
+
+The French Constitution has reformed the condition of the clergy. It has
+raised the income of the lower and middle classes, and taken from the
+higher. None are now less than twelve hundred livres (fifty pounds
+sterling), nor any higher than two or three thousand pounds. What will
+Mr. Burke place against this? Hear what he says.
+
+He says: "That the people of England can see without pain or grudging,
+an archbishop precede a duke; they can see a Bishop of Durham, or a
+Bishop of Winchester in possession of L10,000 a-year; and cannot see why
+it is in worse hands than estates to a like amount, in the hands of this
+earl or that squire." And Mr. Burke offers this as an example to France.
+
+As to the first part, whether the archbishop precedes the duke, or the
+duke the bishop, it is, I believe, to the people in general, somewhat
+like Sternhold and Hopkins, or Hopkins and Sternhold; you may put which
+you please first; and as I confess that I do not understand the merits
+of this case, I will not contest it with Mr. Burke.
+
+But with respect to the latter, I have something to say. Mr. Burke has
+not put the case right. The comparison is out of order, by being put
+between the bishop and the earl or the squire. It ought to be put
+between the bishop and the curate, and then it will stand thus:--"The
+people of England can see without pain or grudging, a Bishop of Durham,
+or a Bishop of Winchester, in possession of ten thousand pounds a-year,
+and a curate on thirty or forty pounds a-year, or less." No, sir, they
+certainly do not see those things without great pain or grudging. It is
+a case that applies itself to every man's sense of justice, and is one
+among many that calls aloud for a constitution.
+
+In France the cry of "the church! the church!" was repeated as often
+as in Mr. Burke's book, and as loudly as when the Dissenters' Bill was
+before the English Parliament; but the generality of the French clergy
+were not to be deceived by this cry any longer. They knew that whatever
+the pretence might be, it was they who were one of the principal objects
+of it. It was the cry of the high beneficed clergy, to prevent any
+regulation of income taking place between those of ten thousand pounds
+a-year and the parish priest. They therefore joined their case to
+those of every other oppressed class of men, and by this union obtained
+redress.
+
+The French Constitution has abolished tythes, that source of perpetual
+discontent between the tythe-holder and the parishioner. When land is
+held on tythe, it is in the condition of an estate held between two
+parties; the one receiving one-tenth, and the other nine-tenths of the
+produce: and consequently, on principles of equity, if the estate can be
+improved, and made to produce by that improvement double or treble what
+it did before, or in any other ratio, the expense of such improvement
+ought to be borne in like proportion between the parties who are to
+share the produce. But this is not the case in tythes: the farmer
+bears the whole expense, and the tythe-holder takes a tenth of the
+improvement, in addition to the original tenth, and by this means gets
+the value of two-tenths instead of one. This is another case that calls
+for a constitution.
+
+The French Constitution hath abolished or renounced Toleration and
+Intolerance also, and hath established Universal Right Of Conscience.
+
+Toleration is not the opposite of Intolerance, but is the counterfeit
+of it. Both are despotisms. The one assumes to itself the right of
+withholding Liberty of Conscience, and the other of granting it. The
+one is the Pope armed with fire and faggot, and the other is the Pope
+selling or granting indulgences. The former is church and state, and the
+latter is church and traffic.
+
+But Toleration may be viewed in a much stronger light. Man worships not
+himself, but his Maker; and the liberty of conscience which he claims is
+not for the service of himself, but of his God. In this case, therefore,
+we must necessarily have the associated idea of two things; the mortal
+who renders the worship, and the Immortal Being who is worshipped.
+Toleration, therefore, places itself, not between man and man, nor
+between church and church, nor between one denomination of religion and
+another, but between God and man; between the being who worships, and
+the Being who is worshipped; and by the same act of assumed authority
+which it tolerates man to pay his worship, it presumptuously and
+blasphemously sets itself up to tolerate the Almighty to receive it.
+
+Were a bill brought into any Parliament, entitled, "An Act to tolerate
+or grant liberty to the Almighty to receive the worship of a Jew or
+Turk," or "to prohibit the Almighty from receiving it," all men would
+startle and call it blasphemy. There would be an uproar. The presumption
+of toleration in religious matters would then present itself unmasked;
+but the presumption is not the less because the name of "Man" only
+appears to those laws, for the associated idea of the worshipper and the
+worshipped cannot be separated. Who then art thou, vain dust and ashes!
+by whatever name thou art called, whether a King, a Bishop, a Church,
+or a State, a Parliament, or anything else, that obtrudest thine
+insignificance between the soul of man and its Maker? Mind thine own
+concerns. If he believes not as thou believest, it is a proof that
+thou believest not as he believes, and there is no earthly power can
+determine between you.
+
+With respect to what are called denominations of religion, if every
+one is left to judge of its own religion, there is no such thing as
+a religion that is wrong; but if they are to judge of each other's
+religion, there is no such thing as a religion that is right; and
+therefore all the world is right, or all the world is wrong. But with
+respect to religion itself, without regard to names, and as directing
+itself from the universal family of mankind to the Divine object of all
+adoration, it is man bringing to his Maker the fruits of his heart; and
+though those fruits may differ from each other like the fruits of the
+earth, the grateful tribute of every one is accepted.
+
+A Bishop of Durham, or a Bishop of Winchester, or the archbishop who
+heads the dukes, will not refuse a tythe-sheaf of wheat because it is
+not a cock of hay, nor a cock of hay because it is not a sheaf of wheat;
+nor a pig, because it is neither one nor the other; but these same
+persons, under the figure of an established church, will not permit
+their Maker to receive the varied tythes of man's devotion.
+
+One of the continual choruses of Mr. Burke's book is "Church and State."
+He does not mean some one particular church, or some one particular
+state, but any church and state; and he uses the term as a general
+figure to hold forth the political doctrine of always uniting the church
+with the state in every country, and he censures the National Assembly
+for not having done this in France. Let us bestow a few thoughts on this
+subject.
+
+All religions are in their nature kind and benign, and united with
+principles of morality. They could not have made proselytes at first by
+professing anything that was vicious, cruel, persecuting, or immoral.
+Like everything else, they had their beginning; and they proceeded by
+persuasion, exhortation, and example. How then is it that they lose
+their native mildness, and become morose and intolerant?
+
+It proceeds from the connection which Mr. Burke recommends. By
+engendering the church with the state, a sort of mule-animal, capable
+only of destroying, and not of breeding up, is produced, called the
+Church established by Law. It is a stranger, even from its birth, to any
+parent mother, on whom it is begotten, and whom in time it kicks out and
+destroys.
+
+The inquisition in Spain does not proceed from the religion originally
+professed, but from this mule-animal, engendered between the church
+and the state. The burnings in Smithfield proceeded from the same
+heterogeneous production; and it was the regeneration of this strange
+animal in England afterwards, that renewed rancour and irreligion among
+the inhabitants, and that drove the people called Quakers and Dissenters
+to America. Persecution is not an original feature in any religion;
+but it is alway the strongly-marked feature of all law-religions, or
+religions established by law. Take away the law-establishment, and
+every religion re-assumes its original benignity. In America, a catholic
+priest is a good citizen, a good character, and a good neighbour; an
+episcopalian minister is of the same description: and this proceeds
+independently of the men, from there being no law-establishment in
+America.
+
+If also we view this matter in a temporal sense, we shall see the ill
+effects it has had on the prosperity of nations. The union of church and
+state has impoverished Spain. The revoking the edict of Nantes drove the
+silk manufacture from that country into England; and church and state
+are now driving the cotton manufacture from England to America and
+France. Let then Mr. Burke continue to preach his antipolitical doctrine
+of Church and State. It will do some good. The National Assembly
+will not follow his advice, but will benefit by his folly. It was by
+observing the ill effects of it in England, that America has been warned
+against it; and it is by experiencing them in France, that the National
+Assembly have abolished it, and, like America, have established
+Universal Right Of Conscience, And Universal Right Of Citizenship.*[7]
+
+I will here cease the comparison with respect to the principles of the
+French Constitution, and conclude this part of the subject with a few
+observations on the organisation of the formal parts of the French and
+English governments.
+
+The executive power in each country is in the hands of a person styled
+the King; but the French Constitution distinguishes between the King and
+the Sovereign: It considers the station of King as official, and places
+Sovereignty in the nation.
+
+The representatives of the nation, who compose the National Assembly,
+and who are the legislative power, originate in and from the people
+by election, as an inherent right in the people.--In England it is
+otherwise; and this arises from the original establishment of what
+is called its monarchy; for, as by the conquest all the rights of the
+people or the nation were absorbed into the hands of the Conqueror, and
+who added the title of King to that of Conqueror, those same matters
+which in France are now held as rights in the people, or in the nation,
+are held in England as grants from what is called the crown. The
+Parliament in England, in both its branches, was erected by patents from
+the descendants of the Conqueror. The House of Commons did not originate
+as a matter of right in the people to delegate or elect, but as a grant
+or boon.
+
+By the French Constitution the nation is always named before the king.
+The third article of the declaration of rights says: "The nation is
+essentially the source (or fountain) of all sovereignty." Mr. Burke
+argues that in England a king is the fountain--that he is the fountain
+of all honour. But as this idea is evidently descended from the conquest
+I shall make no other remark upon it, than that it is the nature of
+conquest to turn everything upside down; and as Mr. Burke will not be
+refused the privilege of speaking twice, and as there are but two parts
+in the figure, the fountain and the spout, he will be right the second
+time.
+
+The French Constitution puts the legislative before the executive, the
+law before the king; la loi, le roi. This also is in the natural
+order of things, because laws must have existence before they can have
+execution.
+
+A king in France does not, in addressing himself to the National
+Assembly, say, "My Assembly," similar to the phrase used in England
+of my "Parliament"; neither can he use it consistently with the
+constitution, nor could it be admitted. There may be propriety in the
+use of it in England, because as is before mentioned, both Houses
+of Parliament originated from what is called the crown by patent or
+boon--and not from the inherent rights of the people, as the National
+Assembly does in France, and whose name designates its origin.
+
+The President of the National Assembly does not ask the King to grant to
+the Assembly liberty of speech, as is the case with the English House
+of Commons. The constitutional dignity of the National Assembly cannot
+debase itself. Speech is, in the first place, one of the natural rights
+of man always retained; and with respect to the National Assembly the
+use of it is their duty, and the nation is their authority. They were
+elected by the greatest body of men exercising the right of election
+the European world ever saw. They sprung not from the filth of rotten
+boroughs, nor are they the vassal representatives of aristocratical
+ones. Feeling the proper dignity of their character they support it.
+Their Parliamentary language, whether for or against a question, is
+free, bold and manly, and extends to all the parts and circumstances of
+the case. If any matter or subject respecting the executive department
+or the person who presides in it (the king) comes before them it is
+debated on with the spirit of men, and in the language of gentlemen; and
+their answer or their address is returned in the same style. They stand
+not aloof with the gaping vacuity of vulgar ignorance, nor bend with the
+cringe of sycophantic insignificance. The graceful pride of truth knows
+no extremes, and preserves, in every latitude of life, the right-angled
+character of man.
+
+Let us now look to the other side of the question. In the addresses
+of the English Parliaments to their kings we see neither the intrepid
+spirit of the old Parliaments of France, nor the serene dignity of the
+present National Assembly; neither do we see in them anything of the
+style of English manners, which border somewhat on bluntness. Since
+then they are neither of foreign extraction, nor naturally of English
+production, their origin must be sought for elsewhere, and that origin
+is the Norman Conquest. They are evidently of the vassalage class of
+manners, and emphatically mark the prostrate distance that exists in
+no other condition of men than between the conqueror and the conquered.
+That this vassalage idea and style of speaking was not got rid of even
+at the Revolution of 1688, is evident from the declaration of Parliament
+to William and Mary in these words: "We do most humbly and faithfully
+submit ourselves, our heirs and posterities, for ever." Submission is
+wholly a vassalage term, repugnant to the dignity of freedom, and an
+echo of the language used at the Conquest.
+
+As the estimation of all things is given by comparison, the Revolution
+of 1688, however from circumstances it may have been exalted beyond its
+value, will find its level. It is already on the wane, eclipsed by the
+enlarging orb of reason, and the luminous revolutions of America and
+France. In less than another century it will go, as well as Mr. Burke's
+labours, "to the family vault of all the Capulets." Mankind will then
+scarcely believe that a country calling itself free would send
+to Holland for a man, and clothe him with power on purpose to put
+themselves in fear of him, and give him almost a million sterling a year
+for leave to submit themselves and their posterity, like bondmen and
+bondwomen, for ever.
+
+But there is a truth that ought to be made known; I have had the
+opportunity of seeing it; which is, that notwithstanding appearances,
+there is not any description of men that despise monarchy so much as
+courtiers. But they well know, that if it were seen by others, as it is
+seen by them, the juggle could not be kept up; they are in the condition
+of men who get their living by a show, and to whom the folly of that
+show is so familiar that they ridicule it; but were the audience to be
+made as wise in this respect as themselves, there would be an end to the
+show and the profits with it. The difference between a republican and
+a courtier with respect to monarchy, is that the one opposes monarchy,
+believing it to be something; and the other laughs at it, knowing it to
+be nothing.
+
+As I used sometimes to correspond with Mr. Burke believing him then to
+be a man of sounder principles than his book shows him to be, I wrote
+to him last winter from Paris, and gave him an account how prosperously
+matters were going on. Among other subjects in that letter, I referred
+to the happy situation the National Assembly were placed in; that they
+had taken ground on which their moral duty and their political interest
+were united. They have not to hold out a language which they do not
+themselves believe, for the fraudulent purpose of making others believe
+it. Their station requires no artifice to support it, and can only be
+maintained by enlightening mankind. It is not their interest to cherish
+ignorance, but to dispel it. They are not in the case of a ministerial
+or an opposition party in England, who, though they are opposed, are
+still united to keep up the common mystery. The National Assembly must
+throw open a magazine of light. It must show man the proper character of
+man; and the nearer it can bring him to that standard, the stronger the
+National Assembly becomes.
+
+In contemplating the French Constitution, we see in it a rational order
+of things. The principles harmonise with the forms, and both with their
+origin. It may perhaps be said as an excuse for bad forms, that they
+are nothing more than forms; but this is a mistake. Forms grow out of
+principles, and operate to continue the principles they grow from. It
+is impossible to practise a bad form on anything but a bad principle.
+It cannot be ingrafted on a good one; and wherever the forms in any
+government are bad, it is a certain indication that the principles are
+bad also.
+
+I will here finally close this subject. I began it by remarking that Mr.
+Burke had voluntarily declined going into a comparison of the English
+and French Constitutions. He apologises (in page 241) for not doing it,
+by saying that he had not time. Mr. Burke's book was upwards of eight
+months in hand, and is extended to a volume of three hundred and
+sixty-six pages. As his omission does injury to his cause, his apology
+makes it worse; and men on the English side of the water will begin to
+consider, whether there is not some radical defect in what is called the
+English constitution, that made it necessary for Mr. Burke to suppress
+the comparison, to avoid bringing it into view.
+
+As Mr. Burke has not written on constitutions so neither has he written
+on the French Revolution. He gives no account of its commencement or its
+progress. He only expresses his wonder. "It looks," says he, "to me, as
+if I were in a great crisis, not of the affairs of France alone, but
+of all Europe, perhaps of more than Europe. All circumstances taken
+together, the French Revolution is the most astonishing that has
+hitherto happened in the world."
+
+As wise men are astonished at foolish things, and other people at
+wise ones, I know not on which ground to account for Mr. Burke's
+astonishment; but certain it is, that he does not understand the French
+Revolution. It has apparently burst forth like a creation from a chaos,
+but it is no more than the consequence of a mental revolution priorily
+existing in France. The mind of the nation had changed beforehand,
+and the new order of things has naturally followed the new order of
+thoughts. I will here, as concisely as I can, trace out the growth of
+the French Revolution, and mark the circumstances that have contributed
+to produce it.
+
+The despotism of Louis XIV., united with the gaiety of his Court, and
+the gaudy ostentation of his character, had so humbled, and at the same
+time so fascinated the mind of France, that the people appeared to have
+lost all sense of their own dignity, in contemplating that of their
+Grand Monarch; and the whole reign of Louis XV., remarkable only for
+weakness and effeminacy, made no other alteration than that of spreading
+a sort of lethargy over the nation, from which it showed no disposition
+to rise.
+
+The only signs which appeared to the spirit of Liberty during those
+periods, are to be found in the writings of the French philosophers.
+Montesquieu, President of the Parliament of Bordeaux, went as far as a
+writer under a despotic government could well proceed; and being obliged
+to divide himself between principle and prudence, his mind often appears
+under a veil, and we ought to give him credit for more than he has
+expressed.
+
+Voltaire, who was both the flatterer and the satirist of despotism, took
+another line. His forte lay in exposing and ridiculing the superstitions
+which priest-craft, united with state-craft, had interwoven with
+governments. It was not from the purity of his principles, or his love
+of mankind (for satire and philanthropy are not naturally concordant),
+but from his strong capacity of seeing folly in its true shape, and his
+irresistible propensity to expose it, that he made those attacks. They
+were, however, as formidable as if the motive had been virtuous; and he
+merits the thanks rather than the esteem of mankind.
+
+On the contrary, we find in the writings of Rousseau, and the Abbe
+Raynal, a loveliness of sentiment in favour of liberty, that excites
+respect, and elevates the human faculties; but having raised this
+animation, they do not direct its operation, and leave the mind in love
+with an object, without describing the means of possessing it.
+
+The writings of Quesnay, Turgot, and the friends of those authors, are
+of the serious kind; but they laboured under the same disadvantage with
+Montesquieu; their writings abound with moral maxims of government, but
+are rather directed to economise and reform the administration of the
+government, than the government itself.
+
+But all those writings and many others had their weight; and by the
+different manner in which they treated the subject of government,
+Montesquieu by his judgment and knowledge of laws, Voltaire by his wit,
+Rousseau and Raynal by their animation, and Quesnay and Turgot by their
+moral maxims and systems of economy, readers of every class met with
+something to their taste, and a spirit of political inquiry began
+to diffuse itself through the nation at the time the dispute between
+England and the then colonies of America broke out.
+
+In the war which France afterwards engaged in, it is very well known
+that the nation appeared to be before-hand with the French ministry.
+Each of them had its view; but those views were directed to different
+objects; the one sought liberty, and the other retaliation on England.
+The French officers and soldiers who after this went to America, were
+eventually placed in the school of Freedom, and learned the practice as
+well as the principles of it by heart.
+
+As it was impossible to separate the military events which took place in
+America from the principles of the American Revolution, the publication
+of those events in France necessarily connected themselves with the
+principles which produced them. Many of the facts were in themselves
+principles; such as the declaration of American Independence, and the
+treaty of alliance between France and America, which recognised the
+natural rights of man, and justified resistance to oppression.
+
+The then Minister of France, Count Vergennes, was not the friend of
+America; and it is both justice and gratitude to say, that it was the
+Queen of France who gave the cause of America a fashion at the French
+Court. Count Vergennes was the personal and social friend of Dr.
+Franklin; and the Doctor had obtained, by his sensible gracefulness,
+a sort of influence over him; but with respect to principles Count
+Vergennes was a despot.
+
+The situation of Dr. Franklin, as Minister from America to France,
+should be taken into the chain of circumstances. The diplomatic
+character is of itself the narrowest sphere of society that man can
+act in. It forbids intercourse by the reciprocity of suspicion; and
+a diplomatic is a sort of unconnected atom, continually repelling and
+repelled. But this was not the case with Dr. Franklin. He was not the
+diplomatic of a Court, but of Man. His character as a philosopher
+had been long established, and his circle of society in France was
+universal.
+
+Count Vergennes resisted for a considerable time the publication in
+France of American constitutions, translated into the French language:
+but even in this he was obliged to give way to public opinion, and
+a sort of propriety in admitting to appear what he had undertaken to
+defend. The American constitutions were to liberty what a grammar is
+to language: they define its parts of speech, and practically construct
+them into syntax.
+
+The peculiar situation of the then Marquis de la Fayette is another link
+in the great chain. He served in America as an American officer under a
+commission of Congress, and by the universality of his acquaintance was
+in close friendship with the civil government of America, as well as
+with the military line. He spoke the language of the country, entered
+into the discussions on the principles of government, and was always a
+welcome friend at any election.
+
+When the war closed, a vast reinforcement to the cause of Liberty spread
+itself over France, by the return of the French officers and soldiers.
+A knowledge of the practice was then joined to the theory; and all
+that was wanting to give it real existence was opportunity. Man cannot,
+properly speaking, make circumstances for his purpose, but he always has
+it in his power to improve them when they occur, and this was the case
+in France.
+
+M. Neckar was displaced in May, 1781; and by the ill-management of
+the finances afterwards, and particularly during the extravagant
+administration of M. Calonne, the revenue of France, which was nearly
+twenty-four millions sterling per year, was become unequal to the
+expenditure, not because the revenue had decreased, but because the
+expenses had increased; and this was a circumstance which the nation
+laid hold of to bring forward a Revolution. The English Minister, Mr.
+Pitt, has frequently alluded to the state of the French finances in his
+budgets, without understanding the subject. Had the French Parliaments
+been as ready to register edicts for new taxes as an English Parliament
+is to grant them, there had been no derangement in the finances, nor yet
+any Revolution; but this will better explain itself as I proceed.
+
+It will be necessary here to show how taxes were formerly raised in
+France. The King, or rather the Court or Ministry acting under the use
+of that name, framed the edicts for taxes at their own discretion,
+and sent them to the Parliaments to be registered; for until they were
+registered by the Parliaments they were not operative. Disputes had long
+existed between the Court and the Parliaments with respect to the extent
+of the Parliament's authority on this head. The Court insisted that the
+authority of Parliaments went no farther than to remonstrate or show
+reasons against the tax, reserving to itself the right of determining
+whether the reasons were well or ill-founded; and in consequence
+thereof, either to withdraw the edict as a matter of choice, or to order
+it to be unregistered as a matter of authority. The Parliaments on their
+part insisted that they had not only a right to remonstrate, but to
+reject; and on this ground they were always supported by the nation.
+
+But to return to the order of my narrative. M. Calonne wanted money: and
+as he knew the sturdy disposition of the Parliaments with respect to new
+taxes, he ingeniously sought either to approach them by a more gentle
+means than that of direct authority, or to get over their heads by a
+manoeuvre; and for this purpose he revived the project of assembling a
+body of men from the several provinces, under the style of an "Assembly
+of the Notables," or men of note, who met in 1787, and who were either
+to recommend taxes to the Parliaments, or to act as a Parliament
+themselves. An Assembly under this name had been called in 1617.
+
+As we are to view this as the first practical step towards the
+Revolution, it will be proper to enter into some particulars respecting
+it. The Assembly of the Notables has in some places been mistaken for
+the States-General, but was wholly a different body, the States-General
+being always by election. The persons who composed the Assembly of the
+Notables were all nominated by the king, and consisted of one hundred
+and forty members. But as M. Calonne could not depend upon a majority of
+this Assembly in his favour, he very ingeniously arranged them in such
+a manner as to make forty-four a majority of one hundred and forty;
+to effect this he disposed of them into seven separate committees, of
+twenty members each. Every general question was to be decided, not by a
+majority of persons, but by a majority of committee, and as eleven votes
+would make a majority in a committee, and four committees a majority of
+seven, M. Calonne had good reason to conclude that as forty-four would
+determine any general question he could not be outvoted. But all his
+plans deceived him, and in the event became his overthrow.
+
+The then Marquis de la Fayette was placed in the second committee, of
+which the Count D'Artois was president, and as money matters were the
+object, it naturally brought into view every circumstance connected with
+it. M. de la Fayette made a verbal charge against Calonne for selling
+crown lands to the amount of two millions of livres, in a manner
+that appeared to be unknown to the king. The Count D'Artois (as if to
+intimidate, for the Bastille was then in being) asked the Marquis if he
+would render the charge in writing? He replied that he would. The Count
+D'Artois did not demand it, but brought a message from the king to that
+purport. M. de la Fayette then delivered in his charge in writing, to
+be given to the king, undertaking to support it. No farther proceedings
+were had upon this affair, but M. Calonne was soon after dismissed by
+the king and set off to England.
+
+As M. de la Fayette, from the experience of what he had seen in America,
+was better acquainted with the science of civil government than the
+generality of the members who composed the Assembly of the Notables
+could then be, the brunt of the business fell considerably to his share.
+The plan of those who had a constitution in view was to contend with the
+Court on the ground of taxes, and some of them openly professed their
+object. Disputes frequently arose between Count D'Artois and M. de
+la Fayette upon various subjects. With respect to the arrears already
+incurred the latter proposed to remedy them by accommodating the
+expenses to the revenue instead of the revenue to the expenses; and as
+objects of reform he proposed to abolish the Bastille and all the State
+prisons throughout the nation (the keeping of which was attended with
+great expense), and to suppress Lettres de Cachet; but those matters
+were not then much attended to, and with respect to Lettres de Cachet, a
+majority of the Nobles appeared to be in favour of them.
+
+On the subject of supplying the Treasury by new taxes the Assembly
+declined taking the matter on themselves, concurring in the opinion that
+they had not authority. In a debate on this subject M. de la Fayette
+said that raising money by taxes could only be done by a National
+Assembly, freely elected by the people, and acting as their
+representatives. Do you mean, said the Count D'Artois, the
+States-General? M. de la Fayette replied that he did. Will you, said
+the Count D'Artois, sign what you say to be given to the king? The other
+replied that he would not only do this but that he would go farther,
+and say that the effectual mode would be for the king to agree to the
+establishment of a constitution.
+
+As one of the plans had thus failed, that of getting the Assembly to act
+as a Parliament, the other came into view, that of recommending. On
+this subject the Assembly agreed to recommend two new taxes to be
+unregistered by the Parliament: the one a stamp-tax and the other a
+territorial tax, or sort of land-tax. The two have been estimated
+at about five millions sterling per annum. We have now to turn our
+attention to the Parliaments, on whom the business was again devolving.
+
+The Archbishop of Thoulouse (since Archbishop of Sens, and now a
+Cardinal), was appointed to the administration of the finances soon
+after the dismission of Calonne. He was also made Prime Minister, an
+office that did not always exist in France. When this office did
+not exist, the chief of each of the principal departments transacted
+business immediately with the King, but when a Prime Minister was
+appointed they did business only with him. The Archbishop arrived to
+more state authority than any minister since the Duke de Choiseul, and
+the nation was strongly disposed in his favour; but by a line of conduct
+scarcely to be accounted for he perverted every opportunity, turned out
+a despot, and sunk into disgrace, and a Cardinal.
+
+The Assembly of the Notables having broken up, the minister sent
+the edicts for the two new taxes recommended by the Assembly to the
+Parliaments to be unregistered. They of course came first before the
+Parliament of Paris, who returned for answer: "that with such a revenue
+as the nation then supported the name of taxes ought not to be mentioned
+but for the purpose of reducing them"; and threw both the edicts
+out.*[8] On this refusal the Parliament was ordered to Versailles,
+where, in the usual form, the King held what under the old government
+was called a Bed of justice; and the two edicts were unregistered
+in presence of the Parliament by an order of State, in the manner
+mentioned, earlier. On this the Parliament immediately returned to
+Paris, renewed their session in form, and ordered the enregistering to
+be struck out, declaring that everything done at Versailles was illegal.
+All the members of the Parliament were then served with Lettres de
+Cachet, and exiled to Troyes; but as they continued as inflexible in
+exile as before, and as vengeance did not supply the place of taxes,
+they were after a short time recalled to Paris.
+
+The edicts were again tendered to them, and the Count D'Artois undertook
+to act as representative of the King. For this purpose he came from
+Versailles to Paris, in a train of procession; and the Parliament were
+assembled to receive him. But show and parade had lost their influence
+in France; and whatever ideas of importance he might set off with,
+he had to return with those of mortification and disappointment. On
+alighting from his carriage to ascend the steps of the Parliament House,
+the crowd (which was numerously collected) threw out trite expressions,
+saying: "This is Monsieur D'Artois, who wants more of our money to
+spend." The marked disapprobation which he saw impressed him with
+apprehensions, and the word Aux armes! (To arms!) was given out by the
+officer of the guard who attended him. It was so loudly vociferated,
+that it echoed through the avenues of the house, and produced a
+temporary confusion. I was then standing in one of the apartments
+through which he had to pass, and could not avoid reflecting how
+wretched was the condition of a disrespected man.
+
+He endeavoured to impress the Parliament by great words, and opened his
+authority by saying, "The King, our Lord and Master." The Parliament
+received him very coolly, and with their usual determination not to
+register the taxes: and in this manner the interview ended.
+
+After this a new subject took place: In the various debates and contests
+which arose between the Court and the Parliaments on the subject of
+taxes, the Parliament of Paris at last declared that although it had
+been customary for Parliaments to enregister edicts for taxes as a
+matter of convenience, the right belonged only to the States-General;
+and that, therefore, the Parliament could no longer with propriety
+continue to debate on what it had not authority to act. The King after
+this came to Paris and held a meeting with the Parliament, in which he
+continued from ten in the morning till about six in the evening, and, in
+a manner that appeared to proceed from him as if unconsulted upon
+with the Cabinet or Ministry, gave his word to the Parliament that the
+States-General should be convened.
+
+But after this another scene arose, on a ground different from all
+the former. The Minister and the Cabinet were averse to calling
+the States-General. They well knew that if the States-General were
+assembled, themselves must fall; and as the King had not mentioned any
+time, they hit on a project calculated to elude, without appearing to
+oppose.
+
+For this purpose, the Court set about making a sort of constitution
+itself. It was principally the work of M. Lamoignon, the Keeper of the
+Seals, who afterwards shot himself. This new arrangement consisted in
+establishing a body under the name of a Cour Pleniere, or Full Court,
+in which were invested all the powers that the Government might have
+occasion to make use of. The persons composing this Court were to be
+nominated by the King; the contended right of taxation was given up
+on the part of the King, and a new criminal code of laws and law
+proceedings was substituted in the room of the former. The thing, in
+many points, contained better principles than those upon which the
+Government had hitherto been administered; but with respect to the Cour
+Pleniere, it was no other than a medium through which despotism was to
+pass, without appearing to act directly from itself.
+
+The Cabinet had high expectations from their new contrivance. The people
+who were to compose the Cour Pleniere were already nominated; and as it
+was necessary to carry a fair appearance, many of the best characters in
+the nation were appointed among the number. It was to commence on May
+8, 1788; but an opposition arose to it on two grounds the one as to
+principle, the other as to form.
+
+On the ground of Principle it was contended that Government had not a
+right to alter itself, and that if the practice was once admitted it
+would grow into a principle and be made a precedent for any future
+alterations the Government might wish to establish: that the right
+of altering the Government was a national right, and not a right of
+Government. And on the ground of form it was contended that the Cour
+Pleniere was nothing more than a larger Cabinet.
+
+The then Duke de la Rochefoucault, Luxembourg, De Noailles, and many
+others, refused to accept the nomination, and strenuously opposed the
+whole plan. When the edict for establishing this new court was sent to
+the Parliaments to be unregistered and put into execution, they
+resisted also. The Parliament of Paris not only refused, but denied the
+authority; and the contest renewed itself between the Parliament and the
+Cabinet more strongly than ever. While the Parliament were sitting in
+debate on this subject, the Ministry ordered a regiment of soldiers to
+surround the House and form a blockade. The members sent out for beds
+and provisions, and lived as in a besieged citadel: and as this had no
+effect, the commanding officer was ordered to enter the Parliament House
+and seize them, which he did, and some of the principal members were
+shut up in different prisons. About the same time a deputation of
+persons arrived from the province of Brittany to remonstrate against the
+establishment of the Cour Pleniere, and those the archbishop sent to the
+Bastille. But the spirit of the nation was not to be overcome, and
+it was so fully sensible of the strong ground it had taken--that of
+withholding taxes--that it contented itself with keeping up a sort of
+quiet resistance, which effectually overthrew all the plans at that time
+formed against it. The project of the Cour Pleniere was at last obliged
+to be given up, and the Prime Minister not long afterwards followed its
+fate, and M. Neckar was recalled into office.
+
+The attempt to establish the Cour Pleniere had an effect upon the nation
+which itself did not perceive. It was a sort of new form of government
+that insensibly served to put the old one out of sight and to unhinge
+it from the superstitious authority of antiquity. It was Government
+dethroning Government; and the old one, by attempting to make a new one,
+made a chasm.
+
+The failure of this scheme renewed the subject of convening the
+State-General; and this gave rise to a new series of politics. There was
+no settled form for convening the States-General: all that it positively
+meant was a deputation from what was then called the Clergy, the
+Noblesse, and the Commons; but their numbers or their proportions had
+not been always the same. They had been convened only on extraordinary
+occasions, the last of which was in 1614; their numbers were then in
+equal proportions, and they voted by orders.
+
+It could not well escape the sagacity of M. Neckar, that the mode of
+1614 would answer neither the purpose of the then government nor of the
+nation. As matters were at that time circumstanced it would have been
+too contentious to agree upon anything. The debates would have been
+endless upon privileges and exemptions, in which neither the wants of
+the Government nor the wishes of the nation for a Constitution would
+have been attended to. But as he did not choose to take the decision
+upon himself, he summoned again the Assembly of the Notables and
+referred it to them. This body was in general interested in the
+decision, being chiefly of aristocracy and high-paid clergy, and they
+decided in favor of the mode of 1614. This decision was against the
+sense of the Nation, and also against the wishes of the Court; for
+the aristocracy opposed itself to both and contended for privileges
+independent of either. The subject was then taken up by the Parliament,
+who recommended that the number of the Commons should be equal to the
+other two: and they should all sit in one house and vote in one body.
+The number finally determined on was 1,200; 600 to be chosen by the
+Commons (and this was less than their proportion ought to have been when
+their worth and consequence is considered on a national scale), 300 by
+the Clergy, and 300 by the Aristocracy; but with respect to the mode of
+assembling themselves, whether together or apart, or the manner in which
+they should vote, those matters were referred.*[9]
+
+The election that followed was not a contested election, but an animated
+one. The candidates were not men, but principles. Societies were formed
+in Paris, and committees of correspondence and communication established
+throughout the nation, for the purpose of enlightening the people, and
+explaining to them the principles of civil government; and so orderly
+was the election conducted, that it did not give rise even to the rumour
+of tumult.
+
+The States-General were to meet at Versailles in April 1789, but did not
+assemble till May. They situated themselves in three separate chambers,
+or rather the Clergy and Aristocracy withdrew each into a separate
+chamber. The majority of the Aristocracy claimed what they called the
+privilege of voting as a separate body, and of giving their consent
+or their negative in that manner; and many of the bishops and the
+high-beneficed clergy claimed the same privilege on the part of their
+Order.
+
+The Tiers Etat (as they were then called) disowned any knowledge of
+artificial orders and artificial privileges; and they were not only
+resolute on this point, but somewhat disdainful. They began to consider
+the Aristocracy as a kind of fungus growing out of the corruption of
+society, that could not be admitted even as a branch of it; and from the
+disposition the Aristocracy had shown by upholding Lettres de Cachet,
+and in sundry other instances, it was manifest that no constitution
+could be formed by admitting men in any other character than as National
+Men.
+
+After various altercations on this head, the Tiers Etat or Commons (as
+they were then called) declared themselves (on a motion made for that
+purpose by the Abbe Sieyes) "The Representative Of The Nation; and that
+the two Orders could be considered but as deputies of corporations, and
+could only have a deliberate voice when they assembled in a national
+character with the national representatives." This proceeding
+extinguished the style of Etats Generaux, or States-General, and erected
+it into the style it now bears, that of L'Assemblee Nationale, or
+National Assembly.
+
+This motion was not made in a precipitate manner. It was the result of
+cool deliberation, and concerned between the national representatives
+and the patriotic members of the two chambers, who saw into the folly,
+mischief, and injustice of artificial privileged distinctions. It was
+become evident, that no constitution, worthy of being called by that
+name, could be established on anything less than a national ground.
+The Aristocracy had hitherto opposed the despotism of the Court, and
+affected the language of patriotism; but it opposed it as its rival (as
+the English Barons opposed King John) and it now opposed the nation from
+the same motives.
+
+On carrying this motion, the national representatives, as had been
+concerted, sent an invitation to the two chambers, to unite with them in
+a national character, and proceed to business. A majority of the clergy,
+chiefly of the parish priests, withdrew from the clerical chamber, and
+joined the nation; and forty-five from the other chamber joined in
+like manner. There is a sort of secret history belonging to this last
+circumstance, which is necessary to its explanation; it was not judged
+prudent that all the patriotic members of the chamber styling itself the
+Nobles, should quit it at once; and in consequence of this arrangement,
+they drew off by degrees, always leaving some, as well to reason the
+case, as to watch the suspected. In a little time the numbers increased
+from forty-five to eighty, and soon after to a greater number;
+which, with the majority of the clergy, and the whole of the national
+representatives, put the malcontents in a very diminutive condition.
+
+The King, who, very different from the general class called by that
+name, is a man of a good heart, showed himself disposed to recommend
+a union of the three chambers, on the ground the National Assembly had
+taken; but the malcontents exerted themselves to prevent it, and began
+now to have another project in view. Their numbers consisted of a
+majority of the aristocratical chamber, and the minority of the clerical
+chamber, chiefly of bishops and high-beneficed clergy; and these men
+were determined to put everything to issue, as well by strength as by
+stratagem. They had no objection to a constitution; but it must be such
+a one as themselves should dictate, and suited to their own views and
+particular situations. On the other hand, the Nation disowned knowing
+anything of them but as citizens, and was determined to shut out all
+such up-start pretensions. The more aristocracy appeared, the more it
+was despised; there was a visible imbecility and want of intellects in
+the majority, a sort of je ne sais quoi, that while it affected to be
+more than citizen, was less than man. It lost ground from contempt more
+than from hatred; and was rather jeered at as an ass, than dreaded as a
+lion. This is the general character of aristocracy, or what are called
+Nobles or Nobility, or rather No-ability, in all countries.
+
+The plan of the malcontents consisted now of two things; either to
+deliberate and vote by chambers (or orders), more especially on all
+questions respecting a Constitution (by which the aristocratical chamber
+would have had a negative on any article of the Constitution); or, in
+case they could not accomplish this object, to overthrow the National
+Assembly entirely.
+
+To effect one or other of these objects they began to cultivate a
+friendship with the despotism they had hitherto attempted to rival, and
+the Count D'Artois became their chief. The king (who has since declared
+himself deceived into their measures) held, according to the old form,
+a Bed of Justice, in which he accorded to the deliberation and vote par
+tete (by head) upon several subjects; but reserved the deliberation and
+vote upon all questions respecting a constitution to the three chambers
+separately. This declaration of the king was made against the advice of
+M. Neckar, who now began to perceive that he was growing out of fashion
+at Court, and that another minister was in contemplation.
+
+As the form of sitting in separate chambers was yet apparently kept up,
+though essentially destroyed, the national representatives immediately
+after this declaration of the King resorted to their own chambers
+to consult on a protest against it; and the minority of the chamber
+(calling itself the Nobles), who had joined the national cause, retired
+to a private house to consult in like manner. The malcontents had by
+this time concerted their measures with the court, which the Count
+D'Artois undertook to conduct; and as they saw from the discontent which
+the declaration excited, and the opposition making against it, that they
+could not obtain a control over the intended constitution by a
+separate vote, they prepared themselves for their final object--that of
+conspiring against the National Assembly, and overthrowing it.
+
+The next morning the door of the chamber of the National Assembly was
+shut against them, and guarded by troops; and the members were
+refused admittance. On this they withdrew to a tennis-ground in the
+neighbourhood of Versailles, as the most convenient place they could
+find, and, after renewing their session, took an oath never to separate
+from each other, under any circumstance whatever, death excepted, until
+they had established a constitution. As the experiment of shutting up
+the house had no other effect than that of producing a closer connection
+in the members, it was opened again the next day, and the public
+business recommenced in the usual place.
+
+We are now to have in view the forming of the new ministry, which was to
+accomplish the overthrow of the National Assembly. But as force would
+be necessary, orders were issued to assemble thirty thousand troops, the
+command of which was given to Broglio, one of the intended new ministry,
+who was recalled from the country for this purpose. But as some
+management was necessary to keep this plan concealed till the moment it
+should be ready for execution, it is to this policy that a declaration
+made by Count D'Artois must be attributed, and which is here proper to
+be introduced.
+
+It could not but occur while the malcontents continued to resort to
+their chambers separate from the National Assembly, more jealousy would
+be excited than if they were mixed with it, and that the plot might be
+suspected. But as they had taken their ground, and now wanted a pretence
+for quitting it, it was necessary that one should be devised. This was
+effectually accomplished by a declaration made by the Count D'Artois:
+"That if they took not a Part in the National Assembly, the life of the
+king would be endangered": on which they quitted their chambers, and
+mixed with the Assembly, in one body.
+
+At the time this declaration was made, it was generally treated as a
+piece of absurdity in Count D'Artois calculated merely to relieve the
+outstanding members of the two chambers from the diminutive situation
+they were put in; and if nothing more had followed, this conclusion
+would have been good. But as things best explain themselves by their
+events, this apparent union was only a cover to the machinations which
+were secretly going on; and the declaration accommodated itself to
+answer that purpose. In a little time the National Assembly found itself
+surrounded by troops, and thousands more were daily arriving. On this a
+very strong declaration was made by the National Assembly to the King,
+remonstrating on the impropriety of the measure, and demanding the
+reason. The King, who was not in the secret of this business, as himself
+afterwards declared, gave substantially for answer, that he had no other
+object in view than to preserve the public tranquility, which appeared
+to be much disturbed.
+
+But in a few days from this time the plot unravelled itself M. Neckar
+and the ministry were displaced, and a new one formed of the enemies
+of the Revolution; and Broglio, with between twenty-five and thirty
+thousand foreign troops, was arrived to support them. The mask was now
+thrown off, and matters were come to a crisis. The event was that in a
+space of three days the new ministry and their abettors found it prudent
+to fly the nation; the Bastille was taken, and Broglio and his foreign
+troops dispersed, as is already related in the former part of this work.
+
+There are some curious circumstances in the history of this short-lived
+ministry, and this short-lived attempt at a counter-revolution. The
+Palace of Versailles, where the Court was sitting, was not more than
+four hundred yards distant from the hall where the National Assembly
+was sitting. The two places were at this moment like the separate
+headquarters of two combatant armies; yet the Court was as perfectly
+ignorant of the information which had arrived from Paris to the National
+Assembly, as if it had resided at an hundred miles distance. The then
+Marquis de la Fayette, who (as has been already mentioned) was chosen to
+preside in the National Assembly on this particular occasion, named by
+order of the Assembly three successive deputations to the king, on the
+day and up to the evening on which the Bastille was taken, to inform and
+confer with him on the state of affairs; but the ministry, who knew not
+so much as that it was attacked, precluded all communication, and were
+solacing themselves how dextrously they had succeeded; but in a few
+hours the accounts arrived so thick and fast that they had to start from
+their desks and run. Some set off in one disguise, and some in another,
+and none in their own character. Their anxiety now was to outride the
+news, lest they should be stopt, which, though it flew fast, flew not so
+fast as themselves.
+
+It is worth remarking that the National Assembly neither pursued those
+fugitive conspirators, nor took any notice of them, nor sought
+to retaliate in any shape whatever. Occupied with establishing a
+constitution founded on the Rights of Man and the Authority of the
+People, the only authority on which Government has a right to exist
+in any country, the National Assembly felt none of those mean passions
+which mark the character of impertinent governments, founding themselves
+on their own authority, or on the absurdity of hereditary succession. It
+is the faculty of the human mind to become what it contemplates, and to
+act in unison with its object.
+
+The conspiracy being thus dispersed, one of the first works of the
+National Assembly, instead of vindictive proclamations, as has been the
+case with other governments, was to publish a declaration of the Rights
+of Man, as the basis on which the new constitution was to be built, and
+which is here subjoined:
+
+
+ Declaration
+
+ Of The
+
+ Rights Of Man And Of Citizens
+
+ By The National Assembly Of France
+
+The representatives of the people of France, formed into a National
+Assembly, considering that ignorance, neglect, or contempt of human
+rights, are the sole causes of public misfortunes and corruptions of
+Government, have resolved to set forth in a solemn declaration, these
+natural, imprescriptible, and inalienable rights: that this declaration
+being constantly present to the minds of the members of the body social,
+they may be forever kept attentive to their rights and their duties;
+that the acts of the legislative and executive powers of Government,
+being capable of being every moment compared with the end of political
+institutions, may be more respected; and also, that the future claims of
+the citizens, being directed by simple and incontestable principles,
+may always tend to the maintenance of the Constitution, and the general
+happiness.
+
+For these reasons the National Assembly doth recognize and declare, in
+the presence of the Supreme Being, and with the hope of his blessing and
+favour, the following sacred rights of men and of citizens:
+
+One: Men are born, and always continue, free and equal in respect of
+their Rights. Civil distinctions, therefore, can be founded only on
+Public Utility.
+
+Two: The end of all Political associations is the Preservation of the
+Natural and Imprescriptible Rights of Man; and these rights are Liberty,
+Property, Security, and Resistance of Oppression.
+
+Three: The Nation is essentially the source of all Sovereignty; nor can
+any individual, or any body of Men, be entitled to any authority which
+is not expressly derived from it.
+
+Four: Political Liberty consists in the power of doing whatever does not
+Injure another. The exercise of the Natural Rights of every Man, has no
+other limits than those which are necessary to secure to every other Man
+the Free exercise of the same Rights; and these limits are determinable
+only by the Law.
+
+Five: The Law ought to Prohibit only actions hurtful to Society. What is
+not Prohibited by the Law should not be hindered; nor should anyone be
+compelled to that which the Law does not Require.
+
+Six: the Law is an expression of the Will of the Community. All Citizens
+have a right to concur, either personally or by their Representatives,
+in its formation. It Should be the same to all, whether it protects or
+punishes; and all being equal in its sight, are equally eligible to
+all Honours, Places, and employments, according to their different
+abilities, without any other distinction than that created by their
+Virtues and talents.
+
+Seven: No Man should be accused, arrested, or held in confinement,
+except in cases determined by the Law, and according to the forms which
+it has prescribed. All who promote, solicit, execute, or cause to be
+executed, arbitrary orders, ought to be punished, and every Citizen
+called upon, or apprehended by virtue of the Law, ought immediately to
+obey, and renders himself culpable by resistance.
+
+Eight: The Law ought to impose no other penalties but such as are
+absolutely and evidently necessary; and no one ought to be punished, but
+in virtue of a Law promulgated before the offence, and Legally applied.
+
+Nine: Every Man being presumed innocent till he has been convicted,
+whenever his detention becomes indispensable, all rigour to him, more
+than is necessary to secure his person, ought to be provided against by
+the Law.
+
+Ten: No Man ought to be molested on account of his opinions, not even on
+account of his Religious opinions, provided his avowal of them does not
+disturb the Public Order established by the Law.
+
+Eleven: The unrestrained communication of thoughts and opinions being
+one of the Most Precious Rights of Man, every Citizen may speak, write,
+and publish freely, provided he is responsible for the abuse of this
+Liberty, in cases determined by the Law.
+
+Twelve: A Public force being necessary to give security to the Rights
+of Men and of Citizens, that force is instituted for the benefit of the
+Community and not for the particular benefit of the persons to whom it
+is intrusted.
+
+Thirteen: A common contribution being necessary for the support of the
+Public force, and for defraying the other expenses of Government,
+it ought to be divided equally among the Members of the Community,
+according to their abilities.
+
+Fourteen: every Citizen has a Right, either by himself or his
+Representative, to a free voice in determining the necessity of Public
+Contributions, the appropriation of them, and their amount, mode of
+assessment, and duration.
+
+Fifteen: every Community has a Right to demand of all its agents an
+account of their conduct.
+
+Sixteen: every Community in which a Separation of Powers and a Security
+of Rights is not Provided for, wants a Constitution.
+
+Seventeen: The Right to Property being inviolable and sacred, no one
+ought to be deprived of it, except in cases of evident Public necessity,
+legally ascertained, and on condition of a previous just Indemnity.
+
+
+
+
+OBSERVATIONS ON THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
+
+The first three articles comprehend in general terms the whole of a
+Declaration of Rights, all the succeeding articles either originate
+from them or follow as elucidations. The 4th, 5th, and 6th define more
+particularly what is only generally expressed in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd.
+
+The 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th articles are declaratory of principles
+upon which laws shall be constructed, conformable to rights already
+declared. But it is questioned by some very good people in France,
+as well as in other countries, whether the 10th article sufficiently
+guarantees the right it is intended to accord with; besides which it
+takes off from the divine dignity of religion, and weakens its operative
+force upon the mind, to make it a subject of human laws. It then
+presents itself to man like light intercepted by a cloudy medium, in
+which the source of it is obscured from his sight, and he sees nothing
+to reverence in the dusky ray.*[10]
+
+The remaining articles, beginning with the twelfth, are substantially
+contained in the principles of the preceding articles; but in the
+particular situation in which France then was, having to undo what was
+wrong, as well as to set up what was right, it was proper to be more
+particular than what in another condition of things would be necessary.
+
+While the Declaration of Rights was before the National Assembly some of
+its members remarked that if a declaration of rights were published
+it should be accompanied by a Declaration of Duties. The observation
+discovered a mind that reflected, and it only erred by not reflecting
+far enough. A Declaration of Rights is, by reciprocity, a Declaration of
+Duties also. Whatever is my right as a man is also the right of another;
+and it becomes my duty to guarantee as well as to possess.
+
+The three first articles are the base of Liberty, as well individual as
+national; nor can any country be called free whose government does not
+take its beginning from the principles they contain, and continue to
+preserve them pure; and the whole of the Declaration of Rights is of
+more value to the world, and will do more good, than all the laws and
+statutes that have yet been promulgated.
+
+In the declaratory exordium which prefaces the Declaration of Rights
+we see the solemn and majestic spectacle of a nation opening its
+commission, under the auspices of its Creator, to establish a
+Government, a scene so new, and so transcendantly unequalled by anything
+in the European world, that the name of a Revolution is diminutive of
+its character, and it rises into a Regeneration of man. What are the
+present Governments of Europe but a scene of iniquity and oppression?
+What is that of England? Do not its own inhabitants say it is a market
+where every man has his price, and where corruption is common traffic
+at the expense of a deluded people? No wonder, then, that the French
+Revolution is traduced. Had it confined itself merely to the destruction
+of flagrant despotism perhaps Mr. Burke and some others had been silent.
+Their cry now is, "It has gone too far"--that is, it has gone too far
+for them. It stares corruption in the face, and the venal tribe are all
+alarmed. Their fear discovers itself in their outrage, and they are but
+publishing the groans of a wounded vice. But from such opposition the
+French Revolution, instead of suffering, receives an homage. The more it
+is struck the more sparks it will emit; and the fear is it will not be
+struck enough. It has nothing to dread from attacks; truth has given it
+an establishment, and time will record it with a name as lasting as his
+own.
+
+Having now traced the progress of the French Revolution through most
+of its principal stages, from its commencement to the taking of the
+Bastille, and its establishment by the Declaration of Rights, I will
+close the subject with the energetic apostrophe of M. de la Fayette,
+"May this great monument, raised to Liberty, serve as a lesson to the
+oppressor, and an example to the oppressed!"*[11]
+
+
+ MISCELLANEOUS CHAPTER
+
+To prevent interrupting the argument in the preceding part of this work,
+or the narrative that follows it, I reserved some observations to be
+thrown together in a Miscellaneous Chapter; by which variety might
+not be censured for confusion. Mr. Burke's book is all Miscellany. His
+intention was to make an attack on the French Revolution; but instead of
+proceeding with an orderly arrangement, he has stormed it with a mob of
+ideas tumbling over and destroying one another.
+
+But this confusion and contradiction in Mr. Burke's Book is easily
+accounted for.--When a man in a wrong cause attempts to steer his course
+by anything else than some polar truth or principle, he is sure to be
+lost. It is beyond the compass of his capacity to keep all the parts
+of an argument together, and make them unite in one issue, by any
+other means than having this guide always in view. Neither memory nor
+invention will supply the want of it. The former fails him, and the
+latter betrays him.
+
+Notwithstanding the nonsense, for it deserves no better name, that Mr.
+Burke has asserted about hereditary rights, and hereditary succession,
+and that a Nation has not a right to form a Government of itself; it
+happened to fall in his way to give some account of what Government is.
+"Government," says he, "is a contrivance of human wisdom."
+
+Admitting that government is a contrivance of human wisdom, it must
+necessarily follow, that hereditary succession, and hereditary rights
+(as they are called), can make no part of it, because it is impossible
+to make wisdom hereditary; and on the other hand, that cannot be a
+wise contrivance, which in its operation may commit the government of a
+nation to the wisdom of an idiot. The ground which Mr. Burke now
+takes is fatal to every part of his cause. The argument changes from
+hereditary rights to hereditary wisdom; and the question is, Who is the
+wisest man? He must now show that every one in the line of hereditary
+succession was a Solomon, or his title is not good to be a king. What a
+stroke has Mr. Burke now made! To use a sailor's phrase, he has swabbed
+the deck, and scarcely left a name legible in the list of Kings; and
+he has mowed down and thinned the House of Peers, with a scythe as
+formidable as Death and Time.
+
+But Mr. Burke appears to have been aware of this retort; and he has
+taken care to guard against it, by making government to be not only
+a contrivance of human wisdom, but a monopoly of wisdom. He puts the
+nation as fools on one side, and places his government of wisdom, all
+wise men of Gotham, on the other side; and he then proclaims, and says
+that "Men have a Right that their Wants should be provided for by this
+wisdom." Having thus made proclamation, he next proceeds to explain to
+them what their wants are, and also what their rights are. In this
+he has succeeded dextrously, for he makes their wants to be a want of
+wisdom; but as this is cold comfort, he then informs them, that they
+have a right (not to any of the wisdom) but to be governed by it; and
+in order to impress them with a solemn reverence for this
+monopoly-government of wisdom, and of its vast capacity for all
+purposes, possible or impossible, right or wrong, he proceeds with
+astrological mysterious importance, to tell to them its powers in these
+words: "The rights of men in government are their advantages; and these
+are often in balance between differences of good; and in compromises
+sometimes between good and evil, and sometimes between
+evil and evil. Political reason is a computing principle;
+adding--subtracting--multiplying--and dividing, morally and not
+metaphysically or mathematically, true moral denominations."
+
+As the wondering audience, whom Mr. Burke supposes himself talking to,
+may not understand all this learned jargon, I will undertake to be
+its interpreter. The meaning, then, good people, of all this, is: That
+government is governed by no principle whatever; that it can make evil
+good, or good evil, just as it pleases. In short, that government is
+arbitrary power.
+
+But there are some things which Mr. Burke has forgotten. First, he has
+not shown where the wisdom originally came from: and secondly, he has
+not shown by what authority it first began to act. In the manner he
+introduces the matter, it is either government stealing wisdom, or
+wisdom stealing government. It is without an origin, and its powers
+without authority. In short, it is usurpation.
+
+Whether it be from a sense of shame, or from a consciousness of some
+radical defect in a government necessary to be kept out of sight, or
+from both, or from any other cause, I undertake not to determine, but
+so it is, that a monarchical reasoner never traces government to its
+source, or from its source. It is one of the shibboleths by which he
+may be known. A thousand years hence, those who shall live in America or
+France, will look back with contemplative pride on the origin of their
+government, and say, This was the work of our glorious ancestors! But
+what can a monarchical talker say? What has he to exult in? Alas he has
+nothing. A certain something forbids him to look back to a beginning,
+lest some robber, or some Robin Hood, should rise from the long
+obscurity of time and say, I am the origin. Hard as Mr. Burke laboured
+at the Regency Bill and Hereditary Succession two years ago, and much
+as he dived for precedents, he still had not boldness enough to bring
+up William of Normandy, and say, There is the head of the list! there
+is the fountain of honour! the son of a prostitute, and the plunderer of
+the English nation.
+
+The opinions of men with respect to government are changing fast in all
+countries. The Revolutions of America and France have thrown a beam of
+light over the world, which reaches into man. The enormous expense of
+governments has provoked people to think, by making them feel; and when
+once the veil begins to rend, it admits not of repair. Ignorance is of a
+peculiar nature: once dispelled, it is impossible to re-establish it.
+It is not originally a thing of itself, but is only the absence of
+knowledge; and though man may be kept ignorant, he cannot be made
+ignorant. The mind, in discovering truth, acts in the same manner as it
+acts through the eye in discovering objects; when once any object has
+been seen, it is impossible to put the mind back to the same condition
+it was in before it saw it. Those who talk of a counter-revolution in
+France, show how little they understand of man. There does not exist in
+the compass of language an arrangement of words to express so much
+as the means of effecting a counter-revolution. The means must be an
+obliteration of knowledge; and it has never yet been discovered how to
+make man unknow his knowledge, or unthink his thoughts.
+
+Mr. Burke is labouring in vain to stop the progress of knowledge; and it
+comes with the worse grace from him, as there is a certain transaction
+known in the city which renders him suspected of being a pensioner in
+a fictitious name. This may account for some strange doctrine he has
+advanced in his book, which though he points it at the Revolution
+Society, is effectually directed against the whole nation.
+
+"The King of England," says he, "holds his crown (for it does not belong
+to the Nation, according to Mr. Burke) in contempt of the choice of the
+Revolution Society, who have not a single vote for a king among them
+either individually or collectively; and his Majesty's heirs each in
+their time and order, will come to the Crown with the same contempt of
+their choice, with which his Majesty has succeeded to that which he now
+wears."
+
+As to who is King in England, or elsewhere, or whether there is any
+King at all, or whether the people choose a Cherokee chief, or a Hessian
+hussar for a King, it is not a matter that I trouble myself about--be
+that to themselves; but with respect to the doctrine, so far as it
+relates to the Rights of Men and Nations, it is as abominable as
+anything ever uttered in the most enslaved country under heaven.
+Whether it sounds worse to my ear, by not being accustomed to hear such
+despotism, than what it does to another person, I am not so well a judge
+of; but of its abominable principle I am at no loss to judge.
+
+It is not the Revolution Society that Mr. Burke means; it is the Nation,
+as well in its original as in its representative character; and he has
+taken care to make himself understood, by saying that they have not
+a vote either collectively or individually. The Revolution Society is
+composed of citizens of all denominations, and of members of both the
+Houses of Parliament; and consequently, if there is not a right to a
+vote in any of the characters, there can be no right to any either in
+the nation or in its Parliament. This ought to be a caution to every
+country how to import foreign families to be kings. It is somewhat
+curious to observe, that although the people of England had been in the
+habit of talking about kings, it is always a Foreign House of Kings;
+hating Foreigners yet governed by them.--It is now the House of
+Brunswick, one of the petty tribes of Germany.
+
+It has hitherto been the practice of the English Parliaments to regulate
+what was called the succession (taking it for granted that the Nation
+then continued to accord to the form of annexing a monarchical branch
+of its government; for without this the Parliament could not have had
+authority to have sent either to Holland or to Hanover, or to impose
+a king upon the nation against its will). And this must be the utmost
+limit to which Parliament can go upon this case; but the right of the
+Nation goes to the whole case, because it has the right of changing its
+whole form of government. The right of a Parliament is only a right in
+trust, a right by delegation, and that but from a very small part of the
+Nation; and one of its Houses has not even this. But the right of the
+Nation is an original right, as universal as taxation. The nation is
+the paymaster of everything, and everything must conform to its general
+will.
+
+I remember taking notice of a speech in what is called the English House
+of Peers, by the then Earl of Shelburne, and I think it was at the time
+he was Minister, which is applicable to this case. I do not directly
+charge my memory with every particular; but the words and the purport,
+as nearly as I remember, were these: "That the form of a Government was
+a matter wholly at the will of the Nation at all times, that if it chose
+a monarchical form, it had a right to have it so; and if it afterwards
+chose to be a Republic, it had a right to be a Republic, and to say to a
+King, 'We have no longer any occasion for you.'"
+
+When Mr. Burke says that "His Majesty's heirs and successors, each in
+their time and order, will come to the crown with the same content of
+their choice with which His Majesty had succeeded to that he wears," it
+is saying too much even to the humblest individual in the country;
+part of whose daily labour goes towards making up the million sterling
+a-year, which the country gives the person it styles a king. Government
+with insolence is despotism; but when contempt is added it becomes
+worse; and to pay for contempt is the excess of slavery. This species
+of government comes from Germany; and reminds me of what one of the
+Brunswick soldiers told me, who was taken prisoner by, the Americans
+in the late war: "Ah!" said he, "America is a fine free country, it is
+worth the people's fighting for; I know the difference by knowing my
+own: in my country, if the prince says eat straw, we eat straw."
+God help that country, thought I, be it England or elsewhere, whose
+liberties are to be protected by German principles of government, and
+Princes of Brunswick!
+
+As Mr. Burke sometimes speaks of England, sometimes of France, and
+sometimes of the world, and of government in general, it is difficult
+to answer his book without apparently meeting him on the same ground.
+Although principles of Government are general subjects, it is next to
+impossible, in many cases, to separate them from the idea of place and
+circumstance, and the more so when circumstances are put for arguments,
+which is frequently the case with Mr. Burke.
+
+In the former part of his book, addressing himself to the people of
+France, he says: "No experience has taught us (meaning the English),
+that in any other course or method than that of a hereditary crown,
+can our liberties be regularly perpetuated and preserved sacred as our
+hereditary right." I ask Mr. Burke, who is to take them away? M. de la
+Fayette, in speaking to France, says: "For a Nation to be free, it
+is sufficient that she wills it." But Mr. Burke represents England as
+wanting capacity to take care of itself, and that its liberties must be
+taken care of by a King holding it in "contempt." If England is sunk
+to this, it is preparing itself to eat straw, as in Hanover, or in
+Brunswick. But besides the folly of the declaration, it happens that
+the facts are all against Mr. Burke. It was by the government being
+hereditary, that the liberties of the people were endangered. Charles I.
+and James II. are instances of this truth; yet neither of them went so
+far as to hold the Nation in contempt.
+
+As it is sometimes of advantage to the people of one country to hear
+what those of other countries have to say respecting it, it is possible
+that the people of France may learn something from Mr. Burke's book, and
+that the people of England may also learn something from the answers
+it will occasion. When Nations fall out about freedom, a wide field of
+debate is opened. The argument commences with the rights of war, without
+its evils, and as knowledge is the object contended for, the party that
+sustains the defeat obtains the prize.
+
+Mr. Burke talks about what he calls an hereditary crown, as if it
+were some production of Nature; or as if, like Time, it had a power to
+operate, not only independently, but in spite of man; or as if it were a
+thing or a subject universally consented to. Alas! it has none of
+those properties, but is the reverse of them all. It is a thing in
+imagination, the propriety of which is more than doubted, and the
+legality of which in a few years will be denied.
+
+But, to arrange this matter in a clearer view than what general
+expression can heads under which (what is called) an hereditary crown,
+or more properly speaking, an hereditary succession to the Government of
+a Nation, can be considered; which are:
+
+First, The right of a particular Family to establish itself.
+
+Secondly, The right of a Nation to establish a particular Family.
+
+With respect to the first of these heads, that of a Family establishing
+itself with hereditary powers on its own authority, and independent of
+the consent of a Nation, all men will concur in calling it despotism;
+and it would be trespassing on their understanding to attempt to prove
+it.
+
+But the second head, that of a Nation establishing a particular Family
+with hereditary powers, does not present itself as despotism on the
+first reflection; but if men will permit it a second reflection to take
+place, and carry that reflection forward but one remove out of their own
+persons to that of their offspring, they will then see that hereditary
+succession becomes in its consequences the same despotism to others,
+which they reprobated for themselves. It operates to preclude the
+consent of the succeeding generations; and the preclusion of consent is
+despotism. When the person who at any time shall be in possession of
+a Government, or those who stand in succession to him, shall say to a
+Nation, I hold this power in "contempt" of you, it signifies not on what
+authority he pretends to say it. It is no relief, but an aggravation to
+a person in slavery, to reflect that he was sold by his parent; and as
+that which heightens the criminality of an act cannot be produced to
+prove the legality of it, hereditary succession cannot be established as
+a legal thing.
+
+In order to arrive at a more perfect decision on this head, it will be
+proper to consider the generation which undertakes to establish a Family
+with hereditary powers, apart and separate from the generations which
+are to follow; and also to consider the character in which the first
+generation acts with respect to succeeding generations.
+
+The generation which first selects a person, and puts him at the head of
+its Government, either with the title of King, or any other distinction,
+acts on its own choice, be it wise or foolish, as a free agent for
+itself The person so set up is not hereditary, but selected and
+appointed; and the generation who sets him up, does not live under a
+hereditary government, but under a government of its own choice and
+establishment. Were the generation who sets him up, and the person so
+set up, to live for ever, it never could become hereditary succession;
+and of consequence hereditary succession can only follow on the death of
+the first parties.
+
+As, therefore, hereditary succession is out of the question with respect
+to the first generation, we have now to consider the character in which
+that generation acts with respect to the commencing generation, and to
+all succeeding ones.
+
+It assumes a character, to which it has neither right nor title. It
+changes itself from a Legislator to a Testator, and effects to make
+its Will, which is to have operation after the demise of the makers, to
+bequeath the Government; and it not only attempts to bequeath, but to
+establish on the succeeding generation, a new and different form of
+Government under which itself lived. Itself, as already observed, lived
+not under a hereditary Government but under a Government of its own
+choice and establishment; and it now attempts, by virtue of a will and
+testament (and which it has not authority to make), to take from the
+commencing generation, and all future ones, the rights and free agency
+by which itself acted.
+
+But, exclusive of the right which any generation has to act collectively
+as a testator, the objects to which it applies itself in this case, are
+not within the compass of any law, or of any will or testament.
+
+The rights of men in society, are neither devisable or transferable, nor
+annihilable, but are descendable only, and it is not in the power of any
+generation to intercept finally, and cut off the descent. If the present
+generation, or any other, are disposed to be slaves, it does not lessen
+the right of the succeeding generation to be free. Wrongs cannot have
+a legal descent. When Mr. Burke attempts to maintain that the English
+nation did at the Revolution of 1688, most solemnly renounce and
+abdicate their rights for themselves, and for all their posterity for
+ever, he speaks a language that merits not reply, and which can
+only excite contempt for his prostitute principles, or pity for his
+ignorance.
+
+In whatever light hereditary succession, as growing out of the will
+and testament of some former generation, presents itself, it is an
+absurdity. A cannot make a will to take from B the property of B,
+and give it to C; yet this is the manner in which (what is called)
+hereditary succession by law operates. A certain former generation made
+a will, to take away the rights of the commencing generation, and all
+future ones, and convey those rights to a third person, who afterwards
+comes forward, and tells them, in Mr. Burke's language, that they have
+no rights, that their rights are already bequeathed to him and that
+he will govern in contempt of them. From such principles, and such
+ignorance, good Lord deliver the world!
+
+But, after all, what is this metaphor called a crown, or rather what
+is monarchy? Is it a thing, or is it a name, or is it a fraud? Is it a
+"contrivance of human wisdom," or of human craft to obtain money from a
+nation under specious pretences? Is it a thing necessary to a nation?
+If it is, in what does that necessity consist, what service does it
+perform, what is its business, and what are its merits? Does the virtue
+consist in the metaphor, or in the man? Doth the goldsmith that makes
+the crown, make the virtue also? Doth it operate like Fortunatus's
+wishing-cap, or Harlequin's wooden sword? Doth it make a man a conjurer?
+In fine, what is it? It appears to be something going much out of
+fashion, falling into ridicule, and rejected in some countries, both as
+unnecessary and expensive. In America it is considered as an absurdity;
+and in France it has so far declined, that the goodness of the man,
+and the respect for his personal character, are the only things that
+preserve the appearance of its existence.
+
+If government be what Mr. Burke describes it, "a contrivance of human
+wisdom" I might ask him, if wisdom was at such a low ebb in England,
+that it was become necessary to import it from Holland and from Hanover?
+But I will do the country the justice to say, that was not the case; and
+even if it was it mistook the cargo. The wisdom of every country, when
+properly exerted, is sufficient for all its purposes; and there
+could exist no more real occasion in England to have sent for a Dutch
+Stadtholder, or a German Elector, than there was in America to have done
+a similar thing. If a country does not understand its own affairs,
+how is a foreigner to understand them, who knows neither its laws, its
+manners, nor its language? If there existed a man so transcendently wise
+above all others, that his wisdom was necessary to instruct a nation,
+some reason might be offered for monarchy; but when we cast our eyes
+about a country, and observe how every part understands its own affairs;
+and when we look around the world, and see that of all men in it, the
+race of kings are the most insignificant in capacity, our reason cannot
+fail to ask us--What are those men kept for?
+
+If there is anything in monarchy which we people of America do not
+understand, I wish Mr. Burke would be so kind as to inform us. I see
+in America, a government extending over a country ten times as large
+as England, and conducted with regularity, for a fortieth part of the
+expense which Government costs in England. If I ask a man in America if
+he wants a King, he retorts, and asks me if I take him for an idiot?
+How is it that this difference happens? are we more or less wise than
+others? I see in America the generality of people living in a style of
+plenty unknown in monarchical countries; and I see that the principle
+of its government, which is that of the equal Rights of Man, is making a
+rapid progress in the world.
+
+If monarchy is a useless thing, why is it kept up anywhere? and if a
+necessary thing, how can it be dispensed with? That civil government
+is necessary, all civilized nations will agree; but civil government is
+republican government. All that part of the government of England which
+begins with the office of constable, and proceeds through the department
+of magistrate, quarter-sessions, and general assize, including trial by
+jury, is republican government. Nothing of monarchy appears in any part
+of it, except in the name which William the Conqueror imposed upon the
+English, that of obliging them to call him "Their Sovereign Lord the
+King."
+
+It is easy to conceive that a band of interested men, such as Placemen,
+Pensioners, Lords of the bed-chamber, Lords of the kitchen, Lords of
+the necessary-house, and the Lord knows what besides, can find as many
+reasons for monarchy as their salaries, paid at the expense of the
+country, amount to; but if I ask the farmer, the manufacturer, the
+merchant, the tradesman, and down through all the occupations of life to
+the common labourer, what service monarchy is to him? he can give me no
+answer. If I ask him what monarchy is, he believes it is something like
+a sinecure.
+
+Notwithstanding the taxes of England amount to almost seventeen millions
+a year, said to be for the expenses of Government, it is still evident
+that the sense of the Nation is left to govern itself, and does
+govern itself, by magistrates and juries, almost at its own charge, on
+republican principles, exclusive of the expense of taxes. The salaries
+of the judges are almost the only charge that is paid out of the
+revenue. Considering that all the internal government is executed by the
+people, the taxes of England ought to be the lightest of any nation
+in Europe; instead of which, they are the contrary. As this cannot be
+accounted for on the score of civil government, the subject necessarily
+extends itself to the monarchical part.
+
+When the people of England sent for George the First (and it would
+puzzle a wiser man than Mr. Burke to discover for what he could be
+wanted, or what service he could render), they ought at least to have
+conditioned for the abandonment of Hanover. Besides the endless German
+intrigues that must follow from a German Elector being King of England,
+there is a natural impossibility of uniting in the same person the
+principles of Freedom and the principles of Despotism, or as it is
+usually called in England Arbitrary Power. A German Elector is in his
+electorate a despot; how then could it be expected that he should be
+attached to principles of liberty in one country, while his interest in
+another was to be supported by despotism? The union cannot exist; and it
+might easily have been foreseen that German Electors would make German
+Kings, or in Mr. Burke's words, would assume government with "contempt."
+The English have been in the habit of considering a King of England only
+in the character in which he appears to them; whereas the same person,
+while the connection lasts, has a home-seat in another country, the
+interest of which is different to their own, and the principles of the
+governments in opposition to each other. To such a person England
+will appear as a town-residence, and the Electorate as the estate. The
+English may wish, as I believe they do, success to the principles of
+liberty in France, or in Germany; but a German Elector trembles for
+the fate of despotism in his electorate; and the Duchy of Mecklenburgh,
+where the present Queen's family governs, is under the same wretched
+state of arbitrary power, and the people in slavish vassalage.
+
+There never was a time when it became the English to watch continental
+intrigues more circumspectly than at the present moment, and to
+distinguish the politics of the Electorate from the politics of the
+Nation. The Revolution of France has entirely changed the ground with
+respect to England and France, as nations; but the German despots, with
+Prussia at their head, are combining against liberty; and the
+fondness of Mr. Pitt for office, and the interest which all his family
+connections have obtained, do not give sufficient security against this
+intrigue.
+
+As everything which passes in the world becomes matter for history, I
+will now quit this subject, and take a concise review of the state of
+parties and politics in England, as Mr. Burke has done in France.
+
+Whether the present reign commenced with contempt, I leave to Mr. Burke:
+certain, however, it is, that it had strongly that appearance. The
+animosity of the English nation, it is very well remembered, ran high;
+and, had the true principles of Liberty been as well understood then
+as they now promise to be, it is probable the Nation would not have
+patiently submitted to so much. George the First and Second were
+sensible of a rival in the remains of the Stuarts; and as they could not
+but consider themselves as standing on their good behaviour, they had
+prudence to keep their German principles of government to themselves;
+but as the Stuart family wore away, the prudence became less necessary.
+
+The contest between rights, and what were called prerogatives, continued
+to heat the nation till some time after the conclusion of the American
+War, when all at once it fell a calm--Execration exchanged itself for
+applause, and Court popularity sprung up like a mushroom in a night.
+
+To account for this sudden transition, it is proper to observe that
+there are two distinct species of popularity; the one excited by merit,
+and the other by resentment. As the Nation had formed itself into
+two parties, and each was extolling the merits of its parliamentary
+champions for and against prerogative, nothing could operate to give
+a more general shock than an immediate coalition of the champions
+themselves. The partisans of each being thus suddenly left in the lurch,
+and mutually heated with disgust at the measure, felt no other relief
+than uniting in a common execration against both. A higher stimulus
+or resentment being thus excited than what the contest on prerogatives
+occasioned, the nation quitted all former objects of rights and wrongs,
+and sought only that of gratification. The indignation at the Coalition
+so effectually superseded the indignation against the Court as to
+extinguish it; and without any change of principles on the part of the
+Court, the same people who had reprobated its despotism united with it
+to revenge themselves on the Coalition Parliament. The case was not,
+which they liked best, but which they hated most; and the least hated
+passed for love. The dissolution of the Coalition Parliament, as it
+afforded the means of gratifying the resentment of the Nation, could not
+fail to be popular; and from hence arose the popularity of the Court.
+
+Transitions of this kind exhibit a Nation under the government of
+temper, instead of a fixed and steady principle; and having once
+committed itself, however rashly, it feels itself urged along to justify
+by continuance its first proceeding. Measures which at other times
+it would censure it now approves, and acts persuasion upon itself to
+suffocate its judgment.
+
+On the return of a new Parliament, the new Minister, Mr. Pitt, found
+himself in a secure majority; and the Nation gave him credit, not out
+of regard to himself, but because it had resolved to do it out of
+resentment to another. He introduced himself to public notice by
+a proposed Reform of Parliament, which in its operation would have
+amounted to a public justification of corruption. The Nation was to be
+at the expense of buying up the rotten boroughs, whereas it ought to
+punish the persons who deal in the traffic.
+
+Passing over the two bubbles of the Dutch business and the million
+a-year to sink the national debt, the matter which most presents itself,
+is the affair of the Regency. Never, in the course of my observation,
+was delusion more successfully acted, nor a nation more completely
+deceived. But, to make this appear, it will be necessary to go over the
+circumstances.
+
+Mr. Fox had stated in the House of Commons, that the Prince of Wales,
+as heir in succession, had a right in himself to assume the Government.
+This was opposed by Mr. Pitt; and, so far as the opposition was
+confined to the doctrine, it was just. But the principles which Mr. Pitt
+maintained on the contrary side were as bad, or worse in their extent,
+than those of Mr. Fox; because they went to establish an aristocracy
+over the nation, and over the small representation it has in the House
+of Commons.
+
+Whether the English form of Government be good or bad, is not in this
+case the question; but, taking it as it stands, without regard to its
+merits or demerits, Mr. Pitt was farther from the point than Mr. Fox.
+
+It is supposed to consist of three parts:--while therefore the Nation
+is disposed to continue this form, the parts have a national standing,
+independent of each other, and are not the creatures of each other. Had
+Mr. Fox passed through Parliament, and said that the person alluded to
+claimed on the ground of the Nation, Mr. Pitt must then have contended
+what he called the right of the Parliament against the right of the
+Nation.
+
+By the appearance which the contest made, Mr. Fox took the hereditary
+ground, and Mr. Pitt the Parliamentary ground; but the fact is, they
+both took hereditary ground, and Mr. Pitt took the worst of the two.
+
+What is called the Parliament is made up of two Houses, one of which is
+more hereditary, and more beyond the control of the Nation than what
+the Crown (as it is called) is supposed to be. It is an hereditary
+aristocracy, assuming and asserting indefeasible, irrevocable rights
+and authority, wholly independent of the Nation. Where, then, was
+the merited popularity of exalting this hereditary power over another
+hereditary power less independent of the Nation than what itself assumed
+to be, and of absorbing the rights of the Nation into a House over which
+it has neither election nor control?
+
+The general impulse of the Nation was right; but it acted without
+reflection. It approved the opposition made to the right set up by
+Mr. Fox, without perceiving that Mr. Pitt was supporting another
+indefeasible right more remote from the Nation, in opposition to it.
+
+With respect to the House of Commons, it is elected but by a small part
+of the Nation; but were the election as universal as taxation, which it
+ought to be, it would still be only the organ of the Nation, and cannot
+possess inherent rights.--When the National Assembly of France resolves
+a matter, the resolve is made in right of the Nation; but Mr. Pitt, on
+all national questions, so far as they refer to the House of Commons,
+absorbs the rights of the Nation into the organ, and makes the organ
+into a Nation, and the Nation itself into a cypher.
+
+In a few words, the question on the Regency was a question of a million
+a-year, which is appropriated to the executive department: and Mr. Pitt
+could not possess himself of any management of this sum, without setting
+up the supremacy of Parliament; and when this was accomplished, it was
+indifferent who should be Regent, as he must be Regent at his own cost.
+Among the curiosities which this contentious debate afforded, was that
+of making the Great Seal into a King, the affixing of which to an act
+was to be royal authority. If, therefore, Royal Authority is a Great
+Seal, it consequently is in itself nothing; and a good Constitution
+would be of infinitely more value to the Nation than what the three
+Nominal Powers, as they now stand, are worth.
+
+The continual use of the word Constitution in the English Parliament
+shows there is none; and that the whole is merely a form of government
+without a Constitution, and constituting itself with what powers it
+pleases. If there were a Constitution, it certainly could be referred
+to; and the debate on any constitutional point would terminate by
+producing the Constitution. One member says this is Constitution, and
+another says that is Constitution--To-day it is one thing; and to-morrow
+something else--while the maintaining of the debate proves there is
+none. Constitution is now the cant word of Parliament, tuning itself
+to the ear of the Nation. Formerly it was the universal supremacy of
+Parliament--the omnipotence of Parliament: But since the progress of
+Liberty in France, those phrases have a despotic harshness in their
+note; and the English Parliament have catched the fashion from
+the National Assembly, but without the substance, of speaking of
+Constitution.
+
+As the present generation of the people in England did not make the
+Government, they are not accountable for any of its defects; but,
+that sooner or later, it must come into their hands to undergo a
+constitutional reformation, is as certain as that the same thing has
+happened in France. If France, with a revenue of nearly twenty-four
+millions sterling, with an extent of rich and fertile country above four
+times larger than England, with a population of twenty-four millions
+of inhabitants to support taxation, with upwards of ninety millions
+sterling of gold and silver circulating in the nation, and with a debt
+less than the present debt of England--still found it necessary, from
+whatever cause, to come to a settlement of its affairs, it solves the
+problem of funding for both countries.
+
+It is out of the question to say how long what is called the English
+constitution has lasted, and to argue from thence how long it is to
+last; the question is, how long can the funding system last? It is a
+thing but of modern invention, and has not yet continued beyond the
+life of a man; yet in that short space it has so far accumulated, that,
+together with the current expenses, it requires an amount of taxes at
+least equal to the whole landed rental of the nation in acres to defray
+the annual expenditure. That a government could not have always gone on
+by the same system which has been followed for the last seventy years,
+must be evident to every man; and for the same reason it cannot always
+go on.
+
+The funding system is not money; neither is it, properly speaking,
+credit. It, in effect, creates upon paper the sum which it appears to
+borrow, and lays on a tax to keep the imaginary capital alive by the
+payment of interest and sends the annuity to market, to be sold for
+paper already in circulation. If any credit is given, it is to the
+disposition of the people to pay the tax, and not to the government,
+which lays it on. When this disposition expires, what is supposed to be
+the credit of Government expires with it. The instance of France under
+the former Government shows that it is impossible to compel the payment
+of taxes by force, when a whole nation is determined to take its stand
+upon that ground.
+
+Mr. Burke, in his review of the finances of France, states the quantity
+of gold and silver in France, at about eighty-eight millions sterling.
+In doing this, he has, I presume, divided by the difference of exchange,
+instead of the standard of twenty-four livres to a pound sterling; for
+M. Neckar's statement, from which Mr. Burke's is taken, is two thousand
+two hundred millions of livres, which is upwards of ninety-one millions
+and a half sterling.
+
+M. Neckar in France, and Mr. George Chalmers at the Office of Trade and
+Plantation in England, of which Lord Hawkesbury is president, published
+nearly about the same time (1786) an account of the quantity of money in
+each nation, from the returns of the Mint of each nation. Mr. Chalmers,
+from the returns of the English Mint at the Tower of London, states
+the quantity of money in England, including Scotland and Ireland, to be
+twenty millions sterling.*[12]
+
+M. Neckar*[13] says that the amount of money in France, recoined from
+the old coin which was called in, was two thousand five hundred millions
+of livres (upwards of one hundred and four millions sterling); and,
+after deducting for waste, and what may be in the West Indies and other
+possible circumstances, states the circulation quantity at home to be
+ninety-one millions and a half sterling; but, taking it as Mr. Burke has
+put it, it is sixty-eight millions more than the national quantity in
+England.
+
+That the quantity of money in France cannot be under this sum, may at
+once be seen from the state of the French Revenue, without referring to
+the records of the French Mint for proofs. The revenue of France, prior
+to the Revolution, was nearly twenty-four millions sterling; and as
+paper had then no existence in France the whole revenue was collected
+upon gold and silver; and it would have been impossible to have
+collected such a quantity of revenue upon a less national quantity than
+M. Neckar has stated. Before the establishment of paper in England,
+the revenue was about a fourth part of the national amount of gold
+and silver, as may be known by referring to the revenue prior to King
+William, and the quantity of money stated to be in the nation at that
+time, which was nearly as much as it is now.
+
+It can be of no real service to a nation, to impose upon itself, or to
+permit itself to be imposed upon; but the prejudices of some, and
+the imposition of others, have always represented France as a nation
+possessing but little money--whereas the quantity is not only more than
+four times what the quantity is in England, but is considerably greater
+on a proportion of numbers. To account for this deficiency on the
+part of England, some reference should be had to the English system of
+funding. It operates to multiply paper, and to substitute it in the room
+of money, in various shapes; and the more paper is multiplied, the
+more opportunities are offered to export the specie; and it admits of
+a possibility (by extending it to small notes) of increasing paper till
+there is no money left.
+
+I know this is not a pleasant subject to English readers; but the
+matters I am going to mention, are so important in themselves, as to
+require the attention of men interested in money transactions of a
+public nature. There is a circumstance stated by M. Neckar, in his
+treatise on the administration of the finances, which has never been
+attended to in England, but which forms the only basis whereon to
+estimate the quantity of money (gold and silver) which ought to be in
+every nation in Europe, to preserve a relative proportion with other
+nations.
+
+Lisbon and Cadiz are the two ports into which (money) gold and silver
+from South America are imported, and which afterwards divide and spread
+themselves over Europe by means of commerce, and increase the quantity
+of money in all parts of Europe. If, therefore, the amount of the annual
+importation into Europe can be known, and the relative proportion of the
+foreign commerce of the several nations by which it can be distributed
+can be ascertained, they give a rule sufficiently true, to ascertain the
+quantity of money which ought to be found in any nation, at any given
+time.
+
+M. Neckar shows from the registers of Lisbon and Cadiz, that the
+importation of gold and silver into Europe, is five millions sterling
+annually. He has not taken it on a single year, but on an average of
+fifteen succeeding years, from 1763 to 1777, both inclusive; in which
+time, the amount was one thousand eight hundred million livres, which is
+seventy-five millions sterling.*[14]
+
+From the commencement of the Hanover succession in 1714 to the time Mr.
+Chalmers published, is seventy-two years; and the quantity imported
+into Europe, in that time, would be three hundred and sixty millions
+sterling.
+
+If the foreign commerce of Great Britain be stated at a sixth part of
+what the whole foreign commerce of Europe amounts to (which is probably
+an inferior estimation to what the gentlemen at the Exchange would
+allow) the proportion which Britain should draw by commerce of this sum,
+to keep herself on a proportion with the rest of Europe, would be also
+a sixth part which is sixty millions sterling; and if the same allowance
+for waste and accident be made for England which M. Neckar makes for
+France, the quantity remaining after these deductions would be fifty-two
+millions; and this sum ought to have been in the nation (at the time Mr.
+Chalmers published), in addition to the sum which was in the nation
+at the commencement of the Hanover succession, and to have made in the
+whole at least sixty-six millions sterling; instead of which there were
+but twenty millions, which is forty-six millions below its proportionate
+quantity.
+
+As the quantity of gold and silver imported into Lisbon and Cadiz
+is more exactly ascertained than that of any commodity imported into
+England, and as the quantity of money coined at the Tower of London
+is still more positively known, the leading facts do not admit of
+controversy. Either, therefore, the commerce of England is unproductive
+of profit, or the gold and silver which it brings in leak continually
+away by unseen means at the average rate of about three-quarters of a
+million a year, which, in the course of seventy-two years, accounts for
+the deficiency; and its absence is supplied by paper.*[15]
+
+The Revolution of France is attended with many novel circumstances, not
+only in the political sphere, but in the circle of money transactions.
+Among others, it shows that a government may be in a state of insolvency
+and a nation rich. So far as the fact is confined to the late Government
+of France, it was insolvent; because the nation would no longer support
+its extravagance, and therefore it could no longer support itself--but
+with respect to the nation all the means existed. A government may be
+said to be insolvent every time it applies to the nation to discharge
+its arrears. The insolvency of the late Government of France and the
+present of England differed in no other respect than as the dispositions
+of the people differ. The people of France refused their aid to the
+old Government; and the people of England submit to taxation without
+inquiry. What is called the Crown in England has been insolvent several
+times; the last of which, publicly known, was in May, 1777, when it
+applied to the nation to discharge upwards of L600,000 private debts,
+which otherwise it could not pay.
+
+It was the error of Mr. Pitt, Mr. Burke, and all those who were
+unacquainted with the affairs of France to confound the French nation
+with the French Government. The French nation, in effect, endeavoured
+to render the late Government insolvent for the purpose of taking
+government into its own hands: and it reserved its means for the support
+of the new Government. In a country of such vast extent and population
+as France the natural means cannot be wanting, and the political means
+appear the instant the nation is disposed to permit them. When Mr.
+Burke, in a speech last winter in the British Parliament, "cast his eyes
+over the map of Europe, and saw a chasm that once was France," he talked
+like a dreamer of dreams. The same natural France existed as before,
+and all the natural means existed with it. The only chasm was that the
+extinction of despotism had left, and which was to be filled up with
+the Constitution more formidable in resources than the power which had
+expired.
+
+Although the French Nation rendered the late Government insolvent, it
+did not permit the insolvency to act towards the creditors; and the
+creditors, considering the Nation as the real pay-master, and the
+Government only as the agent, rested themselves on the nation, in
+preference to the Government. This appears greatly to disturb Mr.
+Burke, as the precedent is fatal to the policy by which governments have
+supposed themselves secure. They have contracted debts, with a view
+of attaching what is called the monied interest of a Nation to their
+support; but the example in France shows that the permanent security of
+the creditor is in the Nation, and not in the Government; and that in
+all possible revolutions that may happen in Governments, the means are
+always with the Nation, and the Nation always in existence. Mr.
+Burke argues that the creditors ought to have abided the fate of the
+Government which they trusted; but the National Assembly considered
+them as the creditors of the Nation, and not of the Government--of the
+master, and not of the steward.
+
+Notwithstanding the late government could not discharge the current
+expenses, the present government has paid off a great part of the
+capital. This has been accomplished by two means; the one by lessening
+the expenses of government, and the other by the sale of the monastic
+and ecclesiastical landed estates. The devotees and penitent debauchees,
+extortioners and misers of former days, to ensure themselves a better
+world than that they were about to leave, had bequeathed immense
+property in trust to the priesthood for pious uses; and the priesthood
+kept it for themselves. The National Assembly has ordered it to be sold
+for the good of the whole nation, and the priesthood to be decently
+provided for.
+
+In consequence of the revolution, the annual interest of the debt of
+France will be reduced at least six millions sterling, by paying off
+upwards of one hundred millions of the capital; which, with lessening
+the former expenses of government at least three millions, will place
+France in a situation worthy the imitation of Europe.
+
+Upon a whole review of the subject, how vast is the contrast! While Mr.
+Burke has been talking of a general bankruptcy in France, the National
+Assembly has been paying off the capital of its debt; and while taxes
+have increased near a million a year in England, they have lowered
+several millions a year in France. Not a word has either Mr. Burke
+or Mr. Pitt said about the French affairs, or the state of the French
+finances, in the present Session of Parliament. The subject begins to be
+too well understood, and imposition serves no longer.
+
+There is a general enigma running through the whole of Mr. Burke's
+book. He writes in a rage against the National Assembly; but what is he
+enraged about? If his assertions were as true as they are groundless,
+and that France by her Revolution, had annihilated her power, and
+become what he calls a chasm, it might excite the grief of a Frenchman
+(considering himself as a national man), and provoke his rage against
+the National Assembly; but why should it excite the rage of Mr. Burke?
+Alas! it is not the nation of France that Mr. Burke means, but the
+Court; and every Court in Europe, dreading the same fate, is in
+mourning. He writes neither in the character of a Frenchman nor an
+Englishman, but in the fawning character of that creature known in all
+countries, and a friend to none--a courtier. Whether it be the Court of
+Versailles, or the Court of St. James, or Carlton-House, or the Court in
+expectation, signifies not; for the caterpillar principle of all Courts
+and Courtiers are alike. They form a common policy throughout Europe,
+detached and separate from the interest of Nations: and while they
+appear to quarrel, they agree to plunder. Nothing can be more terrible
+to a Court or Courtier than the Revolution of France. That which is
+a blessing to Nations is bitterness to them: and as their existence
+depends on the duplicity of a country, they tremble at the approach of
+principles, and dread the precedent that threatens their overthrow.
+
+ CONCLUSION
+
+Reason and Ignorance, the opposites of each other, influence the
+great bulk of mankind. If either of these can be rendered sufficiently
+extensive in a country, the machinery of Government goes easily on.
+Reason obeys itself; and Ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to
+it.
+
+The two modes of the Government which prevail in the world, are:
+
+First, Government by election and representation.
+
+Secondly, Government by hereditary succession.
+
+The former is generally known by the name of republic; the latter by
+that of monarchy and aristocracy.
+
+Those two distinct and opposite forms erect themselves on the two
+distinct and opposite bases of Reason and Ignorance.--As the exercise of
+Government requires talents and abilities, and as talents and abilities
+cannot have hereditary descent, it is evident that hereditary succession
+requires a belief from man to which his reason cannot subscribe, and
+which can only be established upon his ignorance; and the more ignorant
+any country is, the better it is fitted for this species of Government.
+
+On the contrary, Government, in a well-constituted republic, requires no
+belief from man beyond what his reason can give. He sees the rationale
+of the whole system, its origin and its operation; and as it is best
+supported when best understood, the human faculties act with boldness,
+and acquire, under this form of government, a gigantic manliness.
+
+As, therefore, each of those forms acts on a different base, the one
+moving freely by the aid of reason, the other by ignorance; we have next
+to consider, what it is that gives motion to that species of Government
+which is called mixed Government, or, as it is sometimes ludicrously
+styled, a Government of this, that and t' other.
+
+The moving power in this species of Government is, of necessity,
+Corruption. However imperfect election and representation may be in
+mixed Governments, they still give exercise to a greater portion of
+reason than is convenient to the hereditary Part; and therefore it
+becomes necessary to buy the reason up. A mixed Government is an
+imperfect everything, cementing and soldering the discordant parts
+together by corruption, to act as a whole. Mr. Burke appears highly
+disgusted that France, since she had resolved on a revolution, did not
+adopt what he calls "A British Constitution"; and the regretful manner
+in which he expresses himself on this occasion implies a suspicion
+that the British Constitution needed something to keep its defects in
+countenance.
+
+In mixed Governments there is no responsibility: the parts cover each
+other till responsibility is lost; and the corruption which moves the
+machine, contrives at the same time its own escape. When it is laid down
+as a maxim, that a King can do no wrong, it places him in a state
+of similar security with that of idiots and persons insane, and
+responsibility is out of the question with respect to himself. It then
+descends upon the Minister, who shelters himself under a majority in
+Parliament, which, by places, pensions, and corruption, he can always
+command; and that majority justifies itself by the same authority with
+which it protects the Minister. In this rotatory motion, responsibility
+is thrown off from the parts, and from the whole.
+
+When there is a Part in a Government which can do no wrong, it implies
+that it does nothing; and is only the machine of another power, by whose
+advice and direction it acts. What is supposed to be the King in the
+mixed Governments, is the Cabinet; and as the Cabinet is always a part
+of the Parliament, and the members justifying in one character what
+they advise and act in another, a mixed Government becomes a continual
+enigma; entailing upon a country by the quantity of corruption necessary
+to solder the parts, the expense of supporting all the forms of
+government at once, and finally resolving itself into a Government
+by Committee; in which the advisers, the actors, the approvers, the
+justifiers, the persons responsible, and the persons not responsible,
+are the same persons.
+
+By this pantomimical contrivance, and change of scene and character, the
+parts help each other out in matters which neither of them singly
+would assume to act. When money is to be obtained, the mass of variety
+apparently dissolves, and a profusion of parliamentary praises passes
+between the parts. Each admires with astonishment, the wisdom, the
+liberality, the disinterestedness of the other: and all of them breathe
+a pitying sigh at the burthens of the Nation.
+
+But in a well-constituted republic, nothing of this soldering, praising,
+and pitying, can take place; the representation being equal throughout
+the country, and complete in itself, however it may be arranged into
+legislative and executive, they have all one and the same natural
+source. The parts are not foreigners to each other, like democracy,
+aristocracy, and monarchy. As there are no discordant distinctions,
+there is nothing to corrupt by compromise, nor confound by contrivance.
+Public measures appeal of themselves to the understanding of the Nation,
+and, resting on their own merits, disown any flattering applications to
+vanity. The continual whine of lamenting the burden of taxes, however
+successfully it may be practised in mixed Governments, is inconsistent
+with the sense and spirit of a republic. If taxes are necessary, they
+are of course advantageous; but if they require an apology, the apology
+itself implies an impeachment. Why, then, is man thus imposed upon, or
+why does he impose upon himself?
+
+When men are spoken of as kings and subjects, or when Government
+is mentioned under the distinct and combined heads of monarchy,
+aristocracy, and democracy, what is it that reasoning man is to
+understand by the terms? If there really existed in the world two or
+more distinct and separate elements of human power, we should then see
+the several origins to which those terms would descriptively apply;
+but as there is but one species of man, there can be but one element of
+human power; and that element is man himself. Monarchy, aristocracy, and
+democracy, are but creatures of imagination; and a thousand such may be
+contrived as well as three.
+
+From the Revolutions of America and France, and the symptoms that have
+appeared in other countries, it is evident that the opinion of the world
+is changing with respect to systems of Government, and that revolutions
+are not within the compass of political calculations. The progress of
+time and circumstances, which men assign to the accomplishment of great
+changes, is too mechanical to measure the force of the mind, and the
+rapidity of reflection, by which revolutions are generated: All the old
+governments have received a shock from those that already appear, and
+which were once more improbable, and are a greater subject of wonder,
+than a general revolution in Europe would be now.
+
+When we survey the wretched condition of man, under the monarchical and
+hereditary systems of Government, dragged from his home by one power,
+or driven by another, and impoverished by taxes more than by enemies,
+it becomes evident that those systems are bad, and that a general
+revolution in the principle and construction of Governments is
+necessary.
+
+What is government more than the management of the affairs of a Nation?
+It is not, and from its nature cannot be, the property of any particular
+man or family, but of the whole community, at whose expense it is
+supported; and though by force and contrivance it has been usurped
+into an inheritance, the usurpation cannot alter the right of things.
+Sovereignty, as a matter of right, appertains to the Nation only,
+and not to any individual; and a Nation has at all times an inherent
+indefeasible right to abolish any form of Government it finds
+inconvenient, and to establish such as accords with its interest,
+disposition and happiness. The romantic and barbarous distinction of men
+into Kings and subjects, though it may suit the condition of courtiers,
+cannot that of citizens; and is exploded by the principle upon
+which Governments are now founded. Every citizen is a member of the
+Sovereignty, and, as such, can acknowledge no personal subjection; and
+his obedience can be only to the laws.
+
+When men think of what Government is, they must necessarily suppose it
+to possess a knowledge of all the objects and matters upon which its
+authority is to be exercised. In this view of Government, the republican
+system, as established by America and France, operates to embrace the
+whole of a Nation; and the knowledge necessary to the interest of
+all the parts, is to be found in the center, which the parts by
+representation form: But the old Governments are on a construction that
+excludes knowledge as well as happiness; government by Monks, who knew
+nothing of the world beyond the walls of a Convent, is as consistent as
+government by Kings.
+
+What were formerly called Revolutions, were little more than a change
+of persons, or an alteration of local circumstances. They rose and fell
+like things of course, and had nothing in their existence or their fate
+that could influence beyond the spot that produced them. But what we
+now see in the world, from the Revolutions of America and France, are
+a renovation of the natural order of things, a system of principles as
+universal as truth and the existence of man, and combining moral with
+political happiness and national prosperity.
+
+"I. Men are born, and always continue, free and equal in respect of
+their rights. Civil distinctions, therefore, can be founded only on
+public utility.
+
+"II. The end of all political associations is the preservation of the
+natural and imprescriptible rights of man; and these rights are liberty,
+property, security, and resistance of oppression.
+
+"III. The nation is essentially the source of all sovereignty; nor can
+any Individual, or Any Body Of Men, be entitled to any authority which
+is not expressly derived from it."
+
+In these principles, there is nothing to throw a Nation into confusion
+by inflaming ambition. They are calculated to call forth wisdom and
+abilities, and to exercise them for the public good, and not for
+the emolument or aggrandisement of particular descriptions of men or
+families. Monarchical sovereignty, the enemy of mankind, and the source
+of misery, is abolished; and the sovereignty itself is restored to its
+natural and original place, the Nation. Were this the case throughout
+Europe, the cause of wars would be taken away.
+
+It is attributed to Henry the Fourth of France, a man of enlarged and
+benevolent heart, that he proposed, about the year 1610, a plan for
+abolishing war in Europe. The plan consisted in constituting an European
+Congress, or as the French authors style it, a Pacific Republic; by
+appointing delegates from the several Nations who were to act as a
+Court of arbitration in any disputes that might arise between nation and
+nation.
+
+Had such a plan been adopted at the time it was proposed, the taxes of
+England and France, as two of the parties, would have been at least ten
+millions sterling annually to each Nation less than they were at the
+commencement of the French Revolution.
+
+To conceive a cause why such a plan has not been adopted (and that
+instead of a Congress for the purpose of preventing war, it has been
+called only to terminate a war, after a fruitless expense of several
+years) it will be necessary to consider the interest of Governments as a
+distinct interest to that of Nations.
+
+Whatever is the cause of taxes to a Nation, becomes also the means of
+revenue to Government. Every war terminates with an addition of taxes,
+and consequently with an addition of revenue; and in any event of
+war, in the manner they are now commenced and concluded, the power
+and interest of Governments are increased. War, therefore, from its
+productiveness, as it easily furnishes the pretence of necessity for
+taxes and appointments to places and offices, becomes a principal part
+of the system of old Governments; and to establish any mode to abolish
+war, however advantageous it might be to Nations, would be to take
+from such Government the most lucrative of its branches. The frivolous
+matters upon which war is made, show the disposition and avidity of
+Governments to uphold the system of war, and betray the motives upon
+which they act.
+
+Why are not Republics plunged into war, but because the nature of their
+Government does not admit of an interest distinct from that of the
+Nation? Even Holland, though an ill-constructed Republic, and with a
+commerce extending over the world, existed nearly a century without
+war: and the instant the form of Government was changed in France, the
+republican principles of peace and domestic prosperity and economy arose
+with the new Government; and the same consequences would follow the
+cause in other Nations.
+
+As war is the system of Government on the old construction, the
+animosity which Nations reciprocally entertain, is nothing more than
+what the policy of their Governments excites to keep up the spirit of
+the system. Each Government accuses the other of perfidy, intrigue,
+and ambition, as a means of heating the imagination of their respective
+Nations, and incensing them to hostilities. Man is not the enemy of
+man, but through the medium of a false system of Government. Instead,
+therefore, of exclaiming against the ambition of Kings, the exclamation
+should be directed against the principle of such Governments; and
+instead of seeking to reform the individual, the wisdom of a Nation
+should apply itself to reform the system.
+
+Whether the forms and maxims of Governments which are still in practice,
+were adapted to the condition of the world at the period they were
+established, is not in this case the question. The older they are, the
+less correspondence can they have with the present state of things.
+Time, and change of circumstances and opinions, have the same
+progressive effect in rendering modes of Government obsolete as they
+have upon customs and manners.--Agriculture, commerce, manufactures, and
+the tranquil arts, by which the prosperity of Nations is best promoted,
+require a different system of Government, and a different species of
+knowledge to direct its operations, than what might have been required
+in the former condition of the world.
+
+As it is not difficult to perceive, from the enlightened state of
+mankind, that hereditary Governments are verging to their decline,
+and that Revolutions on the broad basis of national sovereignty and
+Government by representation, are making their way in Europe, it
+would be an act of wisdom to anticipate their approach, and produce
+Revolutions by reason and accommodation, rather than commit them to the
+issue of convulsions.
+
+From what we now see, nothing of reform in the political world ought to
+be held improbable. It is an age of Revolutions, in which everything
+may be looked for. The intrigue of Courts, by which the system of war
+is kept up, may provoke a confederation of Nations to abolish it: and
+an European Congress to patronise the progress of free Government, and
+promote the civilisation of Nations with each other, is an event nearer
+in probability, than once were the revolutions and alliance of France
+and America.
+
+ END OF PART I.
+
+
+
+
+RIGHTS OF MAN. PART SECOND, COMBINING PRINCIPLE AND PRACTICE.
+
+By Thomas Paine.
+
+
+
+
+FRENCH TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.
+
+(1792)
+
+THE work of which we offer a translation to the public has created the
+greatest sensation in England. Paine, that man of freedom, who seems
+born to preach "Common Sense" to the whole world with the same success
+as in America, explains in it to the people of England the theory of the
+practice of the Rights of Man.
+
+Owing to the prejudices that still govern that nation, the author has
+been obliged to condescend to answer Mr. Burke. He has done so more
+especially in an extended preface which is nothing but a piece of
+very tedious controversy, in which he shows himself very sensitive to
+criticisms that do not really affect him. To translate it seemed an
+insult to the free French people, and similar reasons have led the
+editors to suppress also a dedicatory epistle addressed by Paine to
+Lafayette.
+
+The French can no longer endure dedicatory epistles. A man should write
+privately to those he esteems: when he publishes a book his thoughts
+should be offered to the public alone. Paine, that uncorrupted friend
+of freedom, believed too in the sincerity of Lafayette. So easy is it
+to deceive men of single-minded purpose! Bred at a distance from courts,
+that austere American does not seem any more on his guard against the
+artful ways and speech of courtiers than some Frenchmen who resemble
+him.
+
+
+ TO
+
+ M. DE LA FAYETTE
+
+After an acquaintance of nearly fifteen years in difficult situations
+in America, and various consultations in Europe, I feel a pleasure in
+presenting to you this small treatise, in gratitude for your services
+to my beloved America, and as a testimony of my esteem for the virtues,
+public and private, which I know you to possess.
+
+The only point upon which I could ever discover that we differed was not
+as to principles of government, but as to time. For my own part I think
+it equally as injurious to good principles to permit them to linger,
+as to push them on too fast. That which you suppose accomplishable in
+fourteen or fifteen years, I may believe practicable in a much shorter
+period. Mankind, as it appears to me, are always ripe enough to
+understand their true interest, provided it be presented clearly to
+their understanding, and that in a manner not to create suspicion by
+anything like self-design, nor offend by assuming too much. Where we
+would wish to reform we must not reproach.
+
+When the American revolution was established I felt a disposition to
+sit serenely down and enjoy the calm. It did not appear to me that any
+object could afterwards arise great enough to make me quit tranquility
+and feel as I had felt before. But when principle, and not place, is the
+energetic cause of action, a man, I find, is everywhere the same.
+
+I am now once more in the public world; and as I have not a right to
+contemplate on so many years of remaining life as you have, I have
+resolved to labour as fast as I can; and as I am anxious for your aid
+and your company, I wish you to hasten your principles and overtake me.
+
+If you make a campaign the ensuing spring, which it is most probable
+there will be no occasion for, I will come and join you. Should the
+campaign commence, I hope it will terminate in the extinction of German
+despotism, and in establishing the freedom of all Germany. When France
+shall be surrounded with revolutions she will be in peace and safety,
+and her taxes, as well as those of Germany, will consequently become
+less.
+
+Your sincere,
+
+ Affectionate Friend,
+
+ Thomas Paine
+
+London, Feb. 9, 1792
+
+
+
+
+PREFACE
+
+When I began the chapter entitled the "Conclusion" in the former part
+of the RIGHTS OF MAN, published last year, it was my intention to have
+extended it to a greater length; but in casting the whole matter in my
+mind, which I wish to add, I found that it must either make the work too
+bulky, or contract my plan too much. I therefore brought it to a close
+as soon as the subject would admit, and reserved what I had further to
+say to another opportunity.
+
+Several other reasons contributed to produce this determination.
+I wished to know the manner in which a work, written in a style of
+thinking and expression different to what had been customary in England,
+would be received before I proceeded farther. A great field was opening
+to the view of mankind by means of the French Revolution. Mr. Burke's
+outrageous opposition thereto brought the controversy into England. He
+attacked principles which he knew (from information) I would contest
+with him, because they are principles I believe to be good, and which I
+have contributed to establish, and conceive myself bound to defend. Had
+he not urged the controversy, I had most probably been a silent man.
+
+Another reason for deferring the remainder of the work was, that Mr.
+Burke promised in his first publication to renew the subject at another
+opportunity, and to make a comparison of what he called the English and
+French Constitutions. I therefore held myself in reserve for him. He has
+published two works since, without doing this: which he certainly would
+not have omitted, had the comparison been in his favour.
+
+In his last work, his "Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs," he has
+quoted about ten pages from the RIGHTS OF MAN, and having given himself
+the trouble of doing this, says he "shall not attempt in the smallest
+degree to refute them," meaning the principles therein contained. I am
+enough acquainted with Mr. Burke to know that he would if he could. But
+instead of contesting them, he immediately after consoles himself with
+saying that "he has done his part."--He has not done his part. He has
+not performed his promise of a comparison of constitutions. He started
+the controversy, he gave the challenge, and has fled from it; and he is
+now a case in point with his own opinion that "the age of chivalry is
+gone!"
+
+The title, as well as the substance of his last work, his "Appeal," is
+his condemnation. Principles must stand on their own merits, and if they
+are good they certainly will. To put them under the shelter of other
+men's authority, as Mr. Burke has done, serves to bring them into
+suspicion. Mr. Burke is not very fond of dividing his honours, but in
+this case he is artfully dividing the disgrace.
+
+But who are those to whom Mr. Burke has made his appeal? A set of
+childish thinkers, and half-way politicians born in the last century,
+men who went no farther with any principle than as it suited their
+purposes as a party; the nation was always left out of the question; and
+this has been the character of every party from that day to this.
+The nation sees nothing of such works, or such politics, worthy its
+attention. A little matter will move a party, but it must be something
+great that moves a nation.
+
+Though I see nothing in Mr. Burke's "Appeal" worth taking much notice
+of, there is, however, one expression upon which I shall offer a few
+remarks. After quoting largely from the RIGHTS OF MAN, and declining to
+contest the principles contained in that work, he says: "This will most
+probably be done (if such writings shall be thought to deserve any other
+refutation than that of criminal justice) by others, who may think with
+Mr. Burke and with the same zeal."
+
+In the first place, it has not yet been done by anybody. Not less, I
+believe, than eight or ten pamphlets intended as answers to the former
+part of the RIGHTS OF MAN have been published by different persons, and
+not one of them to my knowledge, has extended to a second edition, nor
+are even the titles of them so much as generally remembered. As I am
+averse to unnecessary multiplying publications, I have answered none of
+them. And as I believe that a man may write himself out of reputation
+when nobody else can do it, I am careful to avoid that rock.
+
+But as I would decline unnecessary publications on the one hand, so
+would I avoid everything that might appear like sullen pride on the
+other. If Mr. Burke, or any person on his side the question, will
+produce an answer to the RIGHTS OF MAN that shall extend to a half, or
+even to a fourth part of the number of copies to which the Rights Of Man
+extended, I will reply to his work. But until this be done, I shall so
+far take the sense of the public for my guide (and the world knows I am
+not a flatterer) that what they do not think worth while to read, is not
+worth mine to answer. I suppose the number of copies to which the
+first part of the RIGHTS OF MAN extended, taking England, Scotland, and
+Ireland, is not less than between forty and fifty thousand.
+
+I now come to remark on the remaining part of the quotation I have made
+from Mr. Burke.
+
+"If," says he, "such writings shall be thought to deserve any other
+refutation than that of criminal justice."
+
+Pardoning the pun, it must be criminal justice indeed that should
+condemn a work as a substitute for not being able to refute it.
+The greatest condemnation that could be passed upon it would be a
+refutation. But in proceeding by the method Mr. Burke alludes to, the
+condemnation would, in the final event, pass upon the criminality of
+the process and not upon the work, and in this case, I had rather be the
+author, than be either the judge or the jury that should condemn it.
+
+But to come at once to the point. I have differed from some professional
+gentlemen on the subject of prosecutions, and I since find they are
+falling into my opinion, which I will here state as fully, but as
+concisely as I can.
+
+I will first put a case with respect to any law, and then compare it
+with a government, or with what in England is, or has been, called a
+constitution.
+
+It would be an act of despotism, or what in England is called arbitrary
+power, to make a law to prohibit investigating the principles, good or
+bad, on which such a law, or any other is founded.
+
+If a law be bad it is one thing to oppose the practice of it, but it is
+quite a different thing to expose its errors, to reason on its defects,
+and to show cause why it should be repealed, or why another ought to be
+substituted in its place. I have always held it an opinion (making it
+also my practice) that it is better to obey a bad law, making use at the
+same time of every argument to show its errors and procure its repeal,
+than forcibly to violate it; because the precedent of breaking a bad law
+might weaken the force, and lead to a discretionary violation, of those
+which are good.
+
+The case is the same with respect to principles and forms of government,
+or to what are called constitutions and the parts of which they are,
+composed.
+
+It is for the good of nations and not for the emolument or
+aggrandisement of particular individuals, that government ought to be
+established, and that mankind are at the expense of supporting it. The
+defects of every government and constitution both as to principle and
+form, must, on a parity of reasoning, be as open to discussion as the
+defects of a law, and it is a duty which every man owes to society to
+point them out. When those defects, and the means of remedying them, are
+generally seen by a nation, that nation will reform its government or
+its constitution in the one case, as the government repealed or reformed
+the law in the other. The operation of government is restricted to the
+making and the administering of laws; but it is to a nation that the
+right of forming or reforming, generating or regenerating constitutions
+and governments belong; and consequently those subjects, as subjects
+of investigation, are always before a country as a matter of right, and
+cannot, without invading the general rights of that country, be made
+subjects for prosecution. On this ground I will meet Mr. Burke whenever
+he please. It is better that the whole argument should come out than to
+seek to stifle it. It was himself that opened the controversy, and he
+ought not to desert it.
+
+I do not believe that monarchy and aristocracy will continue seven years
+longer in any of the enlightened countries in Europe. If better reasons
+can be shown for them than against them, they will stand; if the
+contrary, they will not. Mankind are not now to be told they shall not
+think, or they shall not read; and publications that go no farther than
+to investigate principles of government, to invite men to reason and to
+reflect, and to show the errors and excellences of different systems,
+have a right to appear. If they do not excite attention, they are not
+worth the trouble of a prosecution; and if they do, the prosecution will
+amount to nothing, since it cannot amount to a prohibition of reading.
+This would be a sentence on the public, instead of the author, and would
+also be the most effectual mode of making or hastening revolution.
+
+On all cases that apply universally to a nation, with respect to systems
+of government, a jury of twelve men is not competent to decide. Where
+there are no witnesses to be examined, no facts to be proved, and where
+the whole matter is before the whole public, and the merits or demerits
+of it resting on their opinion; and where there is nothing to be known
+in a court, but what every body knows out of it, every twelve men is
+equally as good a jury as the other, and would most probably reverse
+each other's verdict; or, from the variety of their opinions, not be
+able to form one. It is one case, whether a nation approve a work, or a
+plan; but it is quite another case, whether it will commit to any such
+jury the power of determining whether that nation have a right to, or
+shall reform its government or not. I mention those cases that Mr. Burke
+may see I have not written on Government without reflecting on what is
+Law, as well as on what are Rights.--The only effectual jury in such
+cases would be a convention of the whole nation fairly elected; for
+in all such cases the whole nation is the vicinage. If Mr. Burke will
+propose such a jury, I will waive all privileges of being the citizen
+of another country, and, defending its principles, abide the issue,
+provided he will do the same; for my opinion is, that his work and his
+principles would be condemned instead of mine.
+
+As to the prejudices which men have from education and habit, in favour
+of any particular form or system of government, those prejudices have
+yet to stand the test of reason and reflection. In fact, such prejudices
+are nothing. No man is prejudiced in favour of a thing, knowing it to be
+wrong. He is attached to it on the belief of its being right; and
+when he sees it is not so, the prejudice will be gone. We have but a
+defective idea of what prejudice is. It might be said, that until men
+think for themselves the whole is prejudice, and not opinion; for that
+only is opinion which is the result of reason and reflection. I offer
+this remark, that Mr. Burke may not confide too much in what have been
+the customary prejudices of the country.
+
+I do not believe that the people of England have ever been fairly and
+candidly dealt by. They have been imposed upon by parties, and by men
+assuming the character of leaders. It is time that the nation should
+rise above those trifles. It is time to dismiss that inattention which
+has so long been the encouraging cause of stretching taxation to excess.
+It is time to dismiss all those songs and toasts which are calculated to
+enslave, and operate to suffocate reflection. On all such subjects men
+have but to think, and they will neither act wrong nor be misled. To
+say that any people are not fit for freedom, is to make poverty their
+choice, and to say they had rather be loaded with taxes than not. If
+such a case could be proved, it would equally prove that those who
+govern are not fit to govern them, for they are a part of the same
+national mass.
+
+But admitting governments to be changed all over Europe; it certainly
+may be done without convulsion or revenge. It is not worth making
+changes or revolutions, unless it be for some great national benefit:
+and when this shall appear to a nation, the danger will be, as in
+America and France, to those who oppose; and with this reflection I
+close my Preface.
+
+ THOMAS PAINE
+
+London, Feb. 9, 1792
+
+
+
+
+RIGHTS OF MAN PART II.
+
+
+
+
+INTRODUCTION.
+
+What Archimedes said of the mechanical powers, may be applied to Reason
+and Liberty. "Had we," said he, "a place to stand upon, we might raise
+the world."
+
+The revolution of America presented in politics what was only theory in
+mechanics. So deeply rooted were all the governments of the old
+world, and so effectually had the tyranny and the antiquity of habit
+established itself over the mind, that no beginning could be made in
+Asia, Africa, or Europe, to reform the political condition of man.
+Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as
+rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think.
+
+But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks,--and all
+it wants,--is the liberty of appearing. The sun needs no inscription
+to distinguish him from darkness; and no sooner did the American
+governments display themselves to the world, than despotism felt a shock
+and man began to contemplate redress.
+
+The independence of America, considered merely as a separation from
+England, would have been a matter but of little importance, had it
+not been accompanied by a revolution in the principles and practice of
+governments. She made a stand, not for herself only, but for the
+world, and looked beyond the advantages herself could receive. Even
+the Hessian, though hired to fight against her, may live to bless his
+defeat; and England, condemning the viciousness of its government,
+rejoice in its miscarriage.
+
+As America was the only spot in the political world where the principle
+of universal reformation could begin, so also was it the best in the
+natural world. An assemblage of circumstances conspired, not only to
+give birth, but to add gigantic maturity to its principles. The scene
+which that country presents to the eye of a spectator, has something in
+it which generates and encourages great ideas. Nature appears to him in
+magnitude. The mighty objects he beholds, act upon his mind by enlarging
+it, and he partakes of the greatness he contemplates.--Its first
+settlers were emigrants from different European nations, and of
+diversified professions of religion, retiring from the governmental
+persecutions of the old world, and meeting in the new, not as enemies,
+but as brothers. The wants which necessarily accompany the cultivation
+of a wilderness produced among them a state of society, which countries
+long harassed by the quarrels and intrigues of governments, had
+neglected to cherish. In such a situation man becomes what he ought. He
+sees his species, not with the inhuman idea of a natural enemy, but as
+kindred; and the example shows to the artificial world, that man must go
+back to Nature for information.
+
+From the rapid progress which America makes in every species of
+improvement, it is rational to conclude that, if the governments of
+Asia, Africa, and Europe had begun on a principle similar to that of
+America, or had not been very early corrupted therefrom, those countries
+must by this time have been in a far superior condition to what they
+are. Age after age has passed away, for no other purpose than to behold
+their wretchedness. Could we suppose a spectator who knew nothing of the
+world, and who was put into it merely to make his observations, he would
+take a great part of the old world to be new, just struggling with the
+difficulties and hardships of an infant settlement. He could not suppose
+that the hordes of miserable poor with which old countries abound
+could be any other than those who had not yet had time to provide for
+themselves. Little would he think they were the consequence of what in
+such countries they call government.
+
+If, from the more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those
+which are in an advanced stage of improvement we still find the greedy
+hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice
+of industry, and grasping the spoil of the multitude. Invention is
+continually exercised to furnish new pretences for revenue and taxation.
+It watches prosperity as its prey, and permits none to escape without a
+tribute.
+
+As revolutions have begun (and as the probability is always greater
+against a thing beginning, than of proceeding after it has begun), it
+is natural to expect that other revolutions will follow. The amazing and
+still increasing expenses with which old governments are conducted, the
+numerous wars they engage in or provoke, the embarrassments they throw
+in the way of universal civilisation and commerce, and the oppression
+and usurpation acted at home, have wearied out the patience, and
+exhausted the property of the world. In such a situation, and with such
+examples already existing, revolutions are to be looked for. They are
+become subjects of universal conversation, and may be considered as the
+Order of the day.
+
+If systems of government can be introduced less expensive and more
+productive of general happiness than those which have existed, all
+attempts to oppose their progress will in the end be fruitless. Reason,
+like time, will make its own way, and prejudice will fall in a combat
+with interest. If universal peace, civilisation, and commerce are
+ever to be the happy lot of man, it cannot be accomplished but by a
+revolution in the system of governments. All the monarchical governments
+are military. War is their trade, plunder and revenue their objects.
+While such governments continue, peace has not the absolute security
+of a day. What is the history of all monarchical governments but a
+disgustful picture of human wretchedness, and the accidental respite of
+a few years' repose? Wearied with war, and tired with human butchery,
+they sat down to rest, and called it peace. This certainly is not the
+condition that heaven intended for man; and if this be monarchy, well
+might monarchy be reckoned among the sins of the Jews.
+
+The revolutions which formerly took place in the world had nothing in
+them that interested the bulk of mankind. They extended only to a change
+of persons and measures, but not of principles, and rose or fell among
+the common transactions of the moment. What we now behold may not
+improperly be called a "counter-revolution." Conquest and tyranny,
+at some earlier period, dispossessed man of his rights, and he is now
+recovering them. And as the tide of all human affairs has its ebb
+and flow in directions contrary to each other, so also is it in this.
+Government founded on a moral theory, on a system of universal peace, on
+the indefeasible hereditary Rights of Man, is now revolving from west
+to east by a stronger impulse than the government of the sword revolved
+from east to west. It interests not particular individuals, but nations
+in its progress, and promises a new era to the human race.
+
+The danger to which the success of revolutions is most exposed is that
+of attempting them before the principles on which they proceed, and the
+advantages to result from them, are sufficiently seen and understood.
+Almost everything appertaining to the circumstances of a nation, has
+been absorbed and confounded under the general and mysterious word
+government. Though it avoids taking to its account the errors it
+commits, and the mischiefs it occasions, it fails not to arrogate to
+itself whatever has the appearance of prosperity. It robs industry of
+its honours, by pedantically making itself the cause of its effects; and
+purloins from the general character of man, the merits that appertain to
+him as a social being.
+
+It may therefore be of use in this day of revolutions to discriminate
+between those things which are the effect of government, and those
+which are not. This will best be done by taking a review of society
+and civilisation, and the consequences resulting therefrom, as things
+distinct from what are called governments. By beginning with this
+investigation, we shall be able to assign effects to their proper causes
+and analyse the mass of common errors.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER I. OF SOCIETY AND CIVILISATION
+
+Great part of that order which reigns among mankind is not the effect
+of government. It has its origin in the principles of society and the
+natural constitution of man. It existed prior to government, and
+would exist if the formality of government was abolished. The mutual
+dependence and reciprocal interest which man has upon man, and all the
+parts of civilised community upon each other, create that great chain
+of connection which holds it together. The landholder, the farmer,
+the manufacturer, the merchant, the tradesman, and every occupation,
+prospers by the aid which each receives from the other, and from the
+whole. Common interest regulates their concerns, and forms their law;
+and the laws which common usage ordains, have a greater influence than
+the laws of government. In fine, society performs for itself almost
+everything which is ascribed to government.
+
+To understand the nature and quantity of government proper for man,
+it is necessary to attend to his character. As Nature created him for
+social life, she fitted him for the station she intended. In all cases
+she made his natural wants greater than his individual powers. No one
+man is capable, without the aid of society, of supplying his own wants,
+and those wants, acting upon every individual, impel the whole of them
+into society, as naturally as gravitation acts to a centre.
+
+But she has gone further. She has not only forced man into society by
+a diversity of wants which the reciprocal aid of each other can supply,
+but she has implanted in him a system of social affections, which,
+though not necessary to his existence, are essential to his happiness.
+There is no period in life when this love for society ceases to act. It
+begins and ends with our being.
+
+If we examine with attention into the composition and constitution
+of man, the diversity of his wants, and the diversity of talents in
+different men for reciprocally accommodating the wants of each other,
+his propensity to society, and consequently to preserve the advantages
+resulting from it, we shall easily discover, that a great part of what
+is called government is mere imposition.
+
+Government is no farther necessary than to supply the few cases to which
+society and civilisation are not conveniently competent; and instances
+are not wanting to show, that everything which government can usefully
+add thereto, has been performed by the common consent of society,
+without government.
+
+For upwards of two years from the commencement of the American War,
+and to a longer period in several of the American States, there were no
+established forms of government. The old governments had been abolished,
+and the country was too much occupied in defence to employ its attention
+in establishing new governments; yet during this interval order and
+harmony were preserved as inviolate as in any country in Europe. There
+is a natural aptness in man, and more so in society, because it embraces
+a greater variety of abilities and resource, to accommodate itself to
+whatever situation it is in. The instant formal government is abolished,
+society begins to act: a general association takes place, and common
+interest produces common security.
+
+So far is it from being true, as has been pretended, that the abolition
+of any formal government is the dissolution of society, that it acts by
+a contrary impulse, and brings the latter the closer together. All
+that part of its organisation which it had committed to its government,
+devolves again upon itself, and acts through its medium. When men, as
+well from natural instinct as from reciprocal benefits, have habituated
+themselves to social and civilised life, there is always enough of its
+principles in practice to carry them through any changes they may find
+necessary or convenient to make in their government. In short, man is so
+naturally a creature of society that it is almost impossible to put him
+out of it.
+
+Formal government makes but a small part of civilised life; and when
+even the best that human wisdom can devise is established, it is a thing
+more in name and idea than in fact. It is to the great and fundamental
+principles of society and civilisation--to the common usage universally
+consented to, and mutually and reciprocally maintained--to the unceasing
+circulation of interest, which, passing through its million channels,
+invigorates the whole mass of civilised man--it is to these things,
+infinitely more than to anything which even the best instituted
+government can perform, that the safety and prosperity of the individual
+and of the whole depends.
+
+The more perfect civilisation is, the less occasion has it for
+government, because the more does it regulate its own affairs, and
+govern itself; but so contrary is the practice of old governments to the
+reason of the case, that the expenses of them increase in the proportion
+they ought to diminish. It is but few general laws that civilised life
+requires, and those of such common usefulness, that whether they are
+enforced by the forms of government or not, the effect will be nearly
+the same. If we consider what the principles are that first condense
+men into society, and what are the motives that regulate their mutual
+intercourse afterwards, we shall find, by the time we arrive at what is
+called government, that nearly the whole of the business is performed by
+the natural operation of the parts upon each other.
+
+Man, with respect to all those matters, is more a creature of
+consistency than he is aware, or than governments would wish him to
+believe. All the great laws of society are laws of nature. Those
+of trade and commerce, whether with respect to the intercourse of
+individuals or of nations, are laws of mutual and reciprocal interest.
+They are followed and obeyed, because it is the interest of the parties
+so to do, and not on account of any formal laws their governments may
+impose or interpose.
+
+But how often is the natural propensity to society disturbed or
+destroyed by the operations of government! When the latter, instead of
+being ingrafted on the principles of the former, assumes to exist for
+itself, and acts by partialities of favour and oppression, it becomes
+the cause of the mischiefs it ought to prevent.
+
+If we look back to the riots and tumults which at various times have
+happened in England, we shall find that they did not proceed from the
+want of a government, but that government was itself the generating
+cause; instead of consolidating society it divided it; it deprived it
+of its natural cohesion, and engendered discontents and disorders
+which otherwise would not have existed. In those associations which men
+promiscuously form for the purpose of trade, or of any concern in which
+government is totally out of the question, and in which they act merely
+on the principles of society, we see how naturally the various parties
+unite; and this shows, by comparison, that governments, so far from
+being always the cause or means of order, are often the destruction
+of it. The riots of 1780 had no other source than the remains of those
+prejudices which the government itself had encouraged. But with respect
+to England there are also other causes.
+
+Excess and inequality of taxation, however disguised in the means, never
+fail to appear in their effects. As a great mass of the community are
+thrown thereby into poverty and discontent, they are constantly on the
+brink of commotion; and deprived, as they unfortunately are, of the
+means of information, are easily heated to outrage. Whatever the
+apparent cause of any riots may be, the real one is always want of
+happiness. It shows that something is wrong in the system of government
+that injures the felicity by which society is to be preserved.
+
+But as a fact is superior to reasoning, the instance of America presents
+itself to confirm these observations. If there is a country in the world
+where concord, according to common calculation, would be least expected,
+it is America. Made up as it is of people from different nations,*[16]
+accustomed to different forms and habits of government, speaking
+different languages, and more different in their modes of worship, it
+would appear that the union of such a people was impracticable; but by
+the simple operation of constructing government on the principles of
+society and the rights of man, every difficulty retires, and all the
+parts are brought into cordial unison. There the poor are not oppressed,
+the rich are not privileged. Industry is not mortified by the splendid
+extravagance of a court rioting at its expense. Their taxes are few,
+because their government is just: and as there is nothing to render them
+wretched, there is nothing to engender riots and tumults.
+
+A metaphysical man, like Mr. Burke, would have tortured his invention
+to discover how such a people could be governed. He would have supposed
+that some must be managed by fraud, others by force, and all by some
+contrivance; that genius must be hired to impose upon ignorance, and
+show and parade to fascinate the vulgar. Lost in the abundance of
+his researches, he would have resolved and re-resolved, and finally
+overlooked the plain and easy road that lay directly before him.
+
+One of the great advantages of the American Revolution has been, that it
+led to a discovery of the principles, and laid open the imposition, of
+governments. All the revolutions till then had been worked within the
+atmosphere of a court, and never on the grand floor of a nation. The
+parties were always of the class of courtiers; and whatever was
+their rage for reformation, they carefully preserved the fraud of the
+profession.
+
+In all cases they took care to represent government as a thing made up
+of mysteries, which only themselves understood; and they hid from the
+understanding of the nation the only thing that was beneficial to know,
+namely, That government is nothing more than a national association
+adding on the principles of society.
+
+Having thus endeavoured to show that the social and civilised state of
+man is capable of performing within itself almost everything necessary
+to its protection and government, it will be proper, on the other hand,
+to take a review of the present old governments, and examine whether
+their principles and practice are correspondent thereto.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER II. OF THE ORIGIN OF THE PRESENT OLD GOVERNMENTS
+
+It is impossible that such governments as have hitherto existed in the
+world, could have commenced by any other means than a total violation of
+every principle sacred and moral. The obscurity in which the origin
+of all the present old governments is buried, implies the iniquity and
+disgrace with which they began. The origin of the present government of
+America and France will ever be remembered, because it is honourable
+to record it; but with respect to the rest, even Flattery has consigned
+them to the tomb of time, without an inscription.
+
+It could have been no difficult thing in the early and solitary ages
+of the world, while the chief employment of men was that of attending
+flocks and herds, for a banditti of ruffians to overrun a country, and
+lay it under contributions. Their power being thus established, the
+chief of the band contrived to lose the name of Robber in that of
+Monarch; and hence the origin of Monarchy and Kings.
+
+The origin of the Government of England, so far as relates to what is
+called its line of monarchy, being one of the latest, is perhaps the
+best recorded. The hatred which the Norman invasion and tyranny begat,
+must have been deeply rooted in the nation, to have outlived the
+contrivance to obliterate it. Though not a courtier will talk of the
+curfew-bell, not a village in England has forgotten it.
+
+Those bands of robbers having parcelled out the world, and divided it
+into dominions, began, as is naturally the case, to quarrel with each
+other. What at first was obtained by violence was considered by others
+as lawful to be taken, and a second plunderer succeeded the first. They
+alternately invaded the dominions which each had assigned to himself,
+and the brutality with which they treated each other explains the
+original character of monarchy. It was ruffian torturing ruffian.
+The conqueror considered the conquered, not as his prisoner, but his
+property. He led him in triumph rattling in chains, and doomed him, at
+pleasure, to slavery or death. As time obliterated the history of their
+beginning, their successors assumed new appearances, to cut off the
+entail of their disgrace, but their principles and objects remained the
+same. What at first was plunder, assumed the softer name of revenue; and
+the power originally usurped, they affected to inherit.
+
+From such beginning of governments, what could be expected but a
+continued system of war and extortion? It has established itself into a
+trade. The vice is not peculiar to one more than to another, but is the
+common principle of all. There does not exist within such governments
+sufficient stamina whereon to engraft reformation; and the shortest and
+most effectual remedy is to begin anew on the ground of the nation.
+
+What scenes of horror, what perfection of iniquity, present themselves
+in contemplating the character and reviewing the history of such
+governments! If we would delineate human nature with a baseness of
+heart and hypocrisy of countenance that reflection would shudder at and
+humanity disown, it is kings, courts and cabinets that must sit for the
+portrait. Man, naturally as he is, with all his faults about him, is not
+up to the character.
+
+Can we possibly suppose that if governments had originated in a right
+principle, and had not an interest in pursuing a wrong one, the world
+could have been in the wretched and quarrelsome condition we have seen
+it? What inducement has the farmer, while following the plough, to lay
+aside his peaceful pursuit, and go to war with the farmer of another
+country? or what inducement has the manufacturer? What is dominion to
+them, or to any class of men in a nation? Does it add an acre to any
+man's estate, or raise its value? Are not conquest and defeat each of
+the same price, and taxes the never-failing consequence?--Though this
+reasoning may be good to a nation, it is not so to a government. War is
+the Pharo-table of governments, and nations the dupes of the game.
+
+If there is anything to wonder at in this miserable scene of governments
+more than might be expected, it is the progress which the peaceful arts
+of agriculture, manufacture and commerce have made beneath such a long
+accumulating load of discouragement and oppression. It serves to show
+that instinct in animals does not act with stronger impulse than
+the principles of society and civilisation operate in man. Under all
+discouragements, he pursues his object, and yields to nothing but
+impossibilities.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER III. OF THE OLD AND NEW SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT
+
+Nothing can appear more contradictory than the principles on which the
+old governments began, and the condition to which society, civilisation
+and commerce are capable of carrying mankind. Government, on the old
+system, is an assumption of power, for the aggrandisement of itself; on
+the new, a delegation of power for the common benefit of society.
+The former supports itself by keeping up a system of war; the latter
+promotes a system of peace, as the true means of enriching a nation.
+The one encourages national prejudices; the other promotes universal
+society, as the means of universal commerce. The one measures its
+prosperity, by the quantity of revenue it extorts; the other proves its
+excellence, by the small quantity of taxes it requires.
+
+Mr. Burke has talked of old and new whigs. If he can amuse himself with
+childish names and distinctions, I shall not interrupt his pleasure. It
+is not to him, but to the Abbe Sieyes, that I address this chapter. I
+am already engaged to the latter gentleman to discuss the subject of
+monarchical government; and as it naturally occurs in comparing the old
+and new systems, I make this the opportunity of presenting to him my
+observations. I shall occasionally take Mr. Burke in my way.
+
+Though it might be proved that the system of government now called the
+New, is the most ancient in principle of all that have existed, being
+founded on the original, inherent Rights of Man: yet, as tyranny and
+the sword have suspended the exercise of those rights for many centuries
+past, it serves better the purpose of distinction to call it the new,
+than to claim the right of calling it the old.
+
+The first general distinction between those two systems, is, that the
+one now called the old is hereditary, either in whole or in part;
+and the new is entirely representative. It rejects all hereditary
+government:
+
+First, As being an imposition on mankind.
+
+Secondly, As inadequate to the purposes for which government is
+necessary.
+
+With respect to the first of these heads--It cannot be proved by what
+right hereditary government could begin; neither does there exist
+within the compass of mortal power a right to establish it. Man has no
+authority over posterity in matters of personal right; and, therefore,
+no man, or body of men, had, or can have, a right to set up hereditary
+government. Were even ourselves to come again into existence, instead of
+being succeeded by posterity, we have not now the right of taking from
+ourselves the rights which would then be ours. On what ground, then, do
+we pretend to take them from others?
+
+All hereditary government is in its nature tyranny. An heritable crown,
+or an heritable throne, or by what other fanciful name such things may
+be called, have no other significant explanation than that mankind are
+heritable property. To inherit a government, is to inherit the people,
+as if they were flocks and herds.
+
+With respect to the second head, that of being inadequate to the
+purposes for which government is necessary, we have only to consider
+what government essentially is, and compare it with the circumstances to
+which hereditary succession is subject.
+
+Government ought to be a thing always in full maturity. It ought to
+be so constructed as to be superior to all the accidents to which
+individual man is subject; and, therefore, hereditary succession, by
+being subject to them all, is the most irregular and imperfect of all
+the systems of government.
+
+We have heard the Rights of Man called a levelling system; but the
+only system to which the word levelling is truly applicable, is the
+hereditary monarchical system. It is a system of mental levelling.
+It indiscriminately admits every species of character to the same
+authority. Vice and virtue, ignorance and wisdom, in short, every
+quality good or bad, is put on the same level. Kings succeed each other,
+not as rationals, but as animals. It signifies not what their mental or
+moral characters are. Can we then be surprised at the abject state of
+the human mind in monarchical countries, when the government itself is
+formed on such an abject levelling system?--It has no fixed character.
+To-day it is one thing; to-morrow it is something else. It changes with
+the temper of every succeeding individual, and is subject to all the
+varieties of each. It is government through the medium of passions and
+accidents. It appears under all the various characters of childhood,
+decrepitude, dotage, a thing at nurse, in leading-strings, or in
+crutches. It reverses the wholesome order of nature. It occasionally
+puts children over men, and the conceits of nonage over wisdom and
+experience. In short, we cannot conceive a more ridiculous figure of
+government, than hereditary succession, in all its cases, presents.
+
+Could it be made a decree in nature, or an edict registered in heaven,
+and man could know it, that virtue and wisdom should invariably
+appertain to hereditary succession, the objection to it would be
+removed; but when we see that nature acts as if she disowned and sported
+with the hereditary system; that the mental character of successors, in
+all countries, is below the average of human understanding; that one is
+a tyrant, another an idiot, a third insane, and some all three together,
+it is impossible to attach confidence to it, when reason in man has
+power to act.
+
+It is not to the Abbe Sieyes that I need apply this reasoning; he has
+already saved me that trouble by giving his own opinion upon the
+case. "If it be asked," says he, "what is my opinion with respect to
+hereditary right, I answer without hesitation, That in good theory, an
+hereditary transmission of any power of office, can never accord with
+the laws of a true representation. Hereditaryship is, in this sense, as
+much an attaint upon principle, as an outrage upon society. But let
+us," continues he, "refer to the history of all elective monarchies and
+principalities: is there one in which the elective mode is not worse
+than the hereditary succession?"
+
+As to debating on which is the worst of the two, it is admitting both
+to be bad; and herein we are agreed. The preference which the Abbe has
+given, is a condemnation of the thing that he prefers. Such a mode of
+reasoning on such a subject is inadmissible, because it finally amounts
+to an accusation upon Providence, as if she had left to man no other
+choice with respect to government than between two evils, the best of
+which he admits to be "an attaint upon principle, and an outrage upon
+society."
+
+Passing over, for the present, all the evils and mischiefs which
+monarchy has occasioned in the world, nothing can more effectually
+prove its uselessness in a state of civil government, than making it
+hereditary. Would we make any office hereditary that required wisdom and
+abilities to fill it? And where wisdom and abilities are not necessary,
+such an office, whatever it may be, is superfluous or insignificant.
+
+Hereditary succession is a burlesque upon monarchy. It puts it in the
+most ridiculous light, by presenting it as an office which any child or
+idiot may fill. It requires some talents to be a common mechanic; but
+to be a king requires only the animal figure of man--a sort of breathing
+automaton. This sort of superstition may last a few years more, but it
+cannot long resist the awakened reason and interest of man.
+
+As to Mr. Burke, he is a stickler for monarchy, not altogether as a
+pensioner, if he is one, which I believe, but as a political man. He
+has taken up a contemptible opinion of mankind, who, in their turn, are
+taking up the same of him. He considers them as a herd of beings that
+must be governed by fraud, effigy, and show; and an idol would be as
+good a figure of monarchy with him, as a man. I will, however, do him
+the justice to say that, with respect to America, he has been very
+complimentary. He always contended, at least in my hearing, that the
+people of America were more enlightened than those of England, or of
+any country in Europe; and that therefore the imposition of show was not
+necessary in their governments.
+
+Though the comparison between hereditary and elective monarchy,
+which the Abbe has made, is unnecessary to the case, because the
+representative system rejects both: yet, were I to make the comparison,
+I should decide contrary to what he has done.
+
+The civil wars which have originated from contested hereditary
+claims, are more numerous, and have been more dreadful, and of longer
+continuance, than those which have been occasioned by election. All the
+civil wars in France arose from the hereditary system; they were either
+produced by hereditary claims, or by the imperfection of the hereditary
+form, which admits of regencies or monarchy at nurse. With respect to
+England, its history is full of the same misfortunes. The contests
+for succession between the houses of York and Lancaster lasted a whole
+century; and others of a similar nature have renewed themselves
+since that period. Those of 1715 and 1745 were of the same kind. The
+succession war for the crown of Spain embroiled almost half Europe. The
+disturbances of Holland are generated from the hereditaryship of the
+Stadtholder. A government calling itself free, with an hereditary
+office, is like a thorn in the flesh, that produces a fermentation which
+endeavours to discharge it.
+
+But I might go further, and place also foreign wars, of whatever kind,
+to the same cause. It is by adding the evil of hereditary succession
+to that of monarchy, that a permanent family interest is created, whose
+constant objects are dominion and revenue. Poland, though an elective
+monarchy, has had fewer wars than those which are hereditary; and it is
+the only government that has made a voluntary essay, though but a small
+one, to reform the condition of the country.
+
+Having thus glanced at a few of the defects of the old, or hereditary
+systems of government, let us compare it with the new, or representative
+system.
+
+The representative system takes society and civilisation for its basis;
+nature, reason, and experience, for its guide.
+
+Experience, in all ages, and in all countries, has demonstrated that it
+is impossible to control Nature in her distribution of mental powers.
+She gives them as she pleases. Whatever is the rule by which she,
+apparently to us, scatters them among mankind, that rule remains
+a secret to man. It would be as ridiculous to attempt to fix the
+hereditaryship of human beauty, as of wisdom. Whatever wisdom
+constituently is, it is like a seedless plant; it may be reared when
+it appears, but it cannot be voluntarily produced. There is always a
+sufficiency somewhere in the general mass of society for all purposes;
+but with respect to the parts of society, it is continually changing
+its place. It rises in one to-day, in another to-morrow, and has most
+probably visited in rotation every family of the earth, and again
+withdrawn.
+
+As this is in the order of nature, the order of government must
+necessarily follow it, or government will, as we see it does, degenerate
+into ignorance. The hereditary system, therefore, is as repugnant to
+human wisdom as to human rights; and is as absurd as it is unjust.
+
+As the republic of letters brings forward the best literary productions,
+by giving to genius a fair and universal chance; so the representative
+system of government is calculated to produce the wisest laws, by
+collecting wisdom from where it can be found. I smile to myself when I
+contemplate the ridiculous insignificance into which literature and all
+the sciences would sink, were they made hereditary; and I carry the same
+idea into governments. An hereditary governor is as inconsistent as an
+hereditary author. I know not whether Homer or Euclid had sons; but
+I will venture an opinion that if they had, and had left their works
+unfinished, those sons could not have completed them.
+
+Do we need a stronger evidence of the absurdity of hereditary government
+than is seen in the descendants of those men, in any line of life, who
+once were famous? Is there scarcely an instance in which there is not
+a total reverse of the character? It appears as if the tide of mental
+faculties flowed as far as it could in certain channels, and then
+forsook its course, and arose in others. How irrational then is the
+hereditary system, which establishes channels of power, in company
+with which wisdom refuses to flow! By continuing this absurdity, man is
+perpetually in contradiction with himself; he accepts, for a king, or a
+chief magistrate, or a legislator, a person whom he would not elect for
+a constable.
+
+It appears to general observation, that revolutions create genius and
+talents; but those events do no more than bring them forward. There is
+existing in man, a mass of sense lying in a dormant state, and which,
+unless something excites it to action, will descend with him, in that
+condition, to the grave. As it is to the advantage of society that
+the whole of its faculties should be employed, the construction of
+government ought to be such as to bring forward, by a quiet and regular
+operation, all that extent of capacity which never fails to appear in
+revolutions.
+
+This cannot take place in the insipid state of hereditary government,
+not only because it prevents, but because it operates to benumb. When
+the mind of a nation is bowed down by any political superstition in its
+government, such as hereditary succession is, it loses a considerable
+portion of its powers on all other subjects and objects. Hereditary
+succession requires the same obedience to ignorance, as to wisdom;
+and when once the mind can bring itself to pay this indiscriminate
+reverence, it descends below the stature of mental manhood. It is fit
+to be great only in little things. It acts a treachery upon itself, and
+suffocates the sensations that urge the detection.
+
+Though the ancient governments present to us a miserable picture of the
+condition of man, there is one which above all others exempts itself
+from the general description. I mean the democracy of the Athenians. We
+see more to admire, and less to condemn, in that great, extraordinary
+people, than in anything which history affords.
+
+Mr. Burke is so little acquainted with constituent principles of
+government, that he confounds democracy and representation together.
+Representation was a thing unknown in the ancient democracies. In those
+the mass of the people met and enacted laws (grammatically speaking) in
+the first person. Simple democracy was no other than the common hall of
+the ancients. It signifies the form, as well as the public principle of
+the government. As those democracies increased in population, and the
+territory extended, the simple democratical form became unwieldy and
+impracticable; and as the system of representation was not known, the
+consequence was, they either degenerated convulsively into monarchies,
+or became absorbed into such as then existed. Had the system of
+representation been then understood, as it now is, there is no reason
+to believe that those forms of government, now called monarchical or
+aristocratical, would ever have taken place. It was the want of
+some method to consolidate the parts of society, after it became too
+populous, and too extensive for the simple democratical form, and also
+the lax and solitary condition of shepherds and herdsmen in other parts
+of the world, that afforded opportunities to those unnatural modes of
+government to begin.
+
+As it is necessary to clear away the rubbish of errors, into which the
+subject of government has been thrown, I will proceed to remark on some
+others.
+
+It has always been the political craft of courtiers and
+court-governments, to abuse something which they called republicanism;
+but what republicanism was, or is, they never attempt to explain. Let us
+examine a little into this case.
+
+The only forms of government are the democratical, the aristocratical,
+the monarchical, and what is now called the representative.
+
+What is called a republic is not any particular form of government. It
+is wholly characteristical of the purport, matter or object for which
+government ought to be instituted, and on which it is to be employed,
+Res-Publica, the public affairs, or the public good; or, literally
+translated, the public thing. It is a word of a good original, referring
+to what ought to be the character and business of government; and in
+this sense it is naturally opposed to the word monarchy, which has a
+base original signification. It means arbitrary power in an individual
+person; in the exercise of which, himself, and not the res-publica, is
+the object.
+
+Every government that does not act on the principle of a Republic, or
+in other words, that does not make the res-publica its whole and sole
+object, is not a good government. Republican government is no other than
+government established and conducted for the interest of the public, as
+well individually as collectively. It is not necessarily connected
+with any particular form, but it most naturally associates with the
+representative form, as being best calculated to secure the end for
+which a nation is at the expense of supporting it.
+
+Various forms of government have affected to style themselves a
+republic. Poland calls itself a republic, which is an hereditary
+aristocracy, with what is called an elective monarchy. Holland calls
+itself a republic, which is chiefly aristocratical, with an hereditary
+stadtholdership. But the government of America, which is wholly on the
+system of representation, is the only real Republic, in character and in
+practice, that now exists. Its government has no other object than the
+public business of the nation, and therefore it is properly a republic;
+and the Americans have taken care that This, and no other, shall
+always be the object of their government, by their rejecting everything
+hereditary, and establishing governments on the system of representation
+only. Those who have said that a republic is not a form of government
+calculated for countries of great extent, mistook, in the first
+place, the business of a government, for a form of government; for
+the res-publica equally appertains to every extent of territory and
+population. And, in the second place, if they meant anything with
+respect to form, it was the simple democratical form, such as was the
+mode of government in the ancient democracies, in which there was no
+representation. The case, therefore, is not, that a republic cannot be
+extensive, but that it cannot be extensive on the simple democratical
+form; and the question naturally presents itself, What is the best form
+of government for conducting the Res-Publica, or the Public Business
+of a nation, after it becomes too extensive and populous for the simple
+democratical form? It cannot be monarchy, because monarchy is subject
+to an objection of the same amount to which the simple democratical form
+was subject.
+
+It is possible that an individual may lay down a system of principles,
+on which government shall be constitutionally established to any extent
+of territory. This is no more than an operation of the mind, acting by
+its own powers. But the practice upon those principles, as applying to
+the various and numerous circumstances of a nation, its agriculture,
+manufacture, trade, commerce, etc., etc., a knowledge of a different
+kind, and which can be had only from the various parts of society. It is
+an assemblage of practical knowledge, which no individual can possess;
+and therefore the monarchical form is as much limited, in useful
+practice, from the incompetency of knowledge, as was the democratical
+form, from the multiplicity of population. The one degenerates, by
+extension, into confusion; the other, into ignorance and incapacity, of
+which all the great monarchies are an evidence. The monarchical form,
+therefore, could not be a substitute for the democratical, because it
+has equal inconveniences.
+
+Much less could it when made hereditary. This is the most effectual of
+all forms to preclude knowledge. Neither could the high democratical
+mind have voluntarily yielded itself to be governed by children and
+idiots, and all the motley insignificance of character, which attends
+such a mere animal system, the disgrace and the reproach of reason and
+of man.
+
+As to the aristocratical form, it has the same vices and defects with
+the monarchical, except that the chance of abilities is better from the
+proportion of numbers, but there is still no security for the right use
+and application of them.*[17]
+
+Referring them to the original simple democracy, it affords the true
+data from which government on a large scale can begin. It is incapable
+of extension, not from its principle, but from the inconvenience of its
+form; and monarchy and aristocracy, from their incapacity. Retaining,
+then, democracy as the ground, and rejecting the corrupt systems of
+monarchy and aristocracy, the representative system naturally presents
+itself; remedying at once the defects of the simple democracy as to
+form, and the incapacity of the other two with respect to knowledge.
+
+Simple democracy was society governing itself without the aid of
+secondary means. By ingrafting representation upon democracy, we arrive
+at a system of government capable of embracing and confederating all the
+various interests and every extent of territory and population; and that
+also with advantages as much superior to hereditary government, as the
+republic of letters is to hereditary literature.
+
+It is on this system that the American government is founded. It is
+representation ingrafted upon democracy. It has fixed the form by a
+scale parallel in all cases to the extent of the principle. What Athens
+was in miniature America will be in magnitude. The one was the wonder of
+the ancient world; the other is becoming the admiration of the present.
+It is the easiest of all the forms of government to be understood and
+the most eligible in practice; and excludes at once the ignorance and
+insecurity of the hereditary mode, and the inconvenience of the simple
+democracy.
+
+It is impossible to conceive a system of government capable of acting
+over such an extent of territory, and such a circle of interests, as is
+immediately produced by the operation of representation. France, great
+and populous as it is, is but a spot in the capaciousness of the system.
+It is preferable to simple democracy even in small territories. Athens,
+by representation, would have outrivalled her own democracy.
+
+That which is called government, or rather that which we ought to
+conceive government to be, is no more than some common center in which
+all the parts of society unite. This cannot be accomplished by any
+method so conducive to the various interests of the community, as by the
+representative system. It concentrates the knowledge necessary to the
+interest of the parts, and of the whole. It places government in a state
+of constant maturity. It is, as has already been observed, never young,
+never old. It is subject neither to nonage, nor dotage. It is never
+in the cradle, nor on crutches. It admits not of a separation between
+knowledge and power, and is superior, as government always ought to be,
+to all the accidents of individual man, and is therefore superior to
+what is called monarchy.
+
+A nation is not a body, the figure of which is to be represented by
+the human body; but is like a body contained within a circle, having a
+common center, in which every radius meets; and that center is formed by
+representation. To connect representation with what is called monarchy,
+is eccentric government. Representation is of itself the delegated
+monarchy of a nation, and cannot debase itself by dividing it with
+another.
+
+Mr. Burke has two or three times, in his parliamentary speeches, and in
+his publications, made use of a jingle of words that convey no ideas.
+Speaking of government, he says, "It is better to have monarchy for its
+basis, and republicanism for its corrective, than republicanism for its
+basis, and monarchy for its corrective."--If he means that it is
+better to correct folly with wisdom, than wisdom with folly, I will no
+otherwise contend with him, than that it would be much better to reject
+the folly entirely.
+
+But what is this thing which Mr. Burke calls monarchy? Will he explain
+it? All men can understand what representation is; and that it must
+necessarily include a variety of knowledge and talents. But what
+security is there for the same qualities on the part of monarchy? or,
+when the monarchy is a child, where then is the wisdom? What does
+it know about government? Who then is the monarch, or where is the
+monarchy? If it is to be performed by regency, it proves to be a farce.
+A regency is a mock species of republic, and the whole of monarchy
+deserves no better description. It is a thing as various as imagination
+can paint. It has none of the stable character that government ought
+to possess. Every succession is a revolution, and every regency a
+counter-revolution. The whole of it is a scene of perpetual court cabal
+and intrigue, of which Mr. Burke is himself an instance. To render
+monarchy consistent with government, the next in succession should
+not be born a child, but a man at once, and that man a Solomon. It is
+ridiculous that nations are to wait and government be interrupted till
+boys grow to be men.
+
+Whether I have too little sense to see, or too much to be imposed upon;
+whether I have too much or too little pride, or of anything else,
+I leave out of the question; but certain it is, that what is called
+monarchy, always appears to me a silly, contemptible thing. I compare it
+to something kept behind a curtain, about which there is a great deal of
+bustle and fuss, and a wonderful air of seeming solemnity; but when, by
+any accident, the curtain happens to be open--and the company see what
+it is, they burst into laughter.
+
+In the representative system of government, nothing of this can happen.
+Like the nation itself, it possesses a perpetual stamina, as well of
+body as of mind, and presents itself on the open theatre of the world in
+a fair and manly manner. Whatever are its excellences or defects, they
+are visible to all. It exists not by fraud and mystery; it deals not in
+cant and sophistry; but inspires a language that, passing from heart to
+heart, is felt and understood.
+
+We must shut our eyes against reason, we must basely degrade our
+understanding, not to see the folly of what is called monarchy. Nature
+is orderly in all her works; but this is a mode of government that
+counteracts nature. It turns the progress of the human faculties upside
+down. It subjects age to be governed by children, and wisdom by folly.
+
+On the contrary, the representative system is always parallel with the
+order and immutable laws of nature, and meets the reason of man in every
+part. For example:
+
+In the American Federal Government, more power is delegated to the
+President of the United States than to any other individual member of
+Congress. He cannot, therefore, be elected to this office under the
+age of thirty-five years. By this time the judgment of man becomes more
+matured, and he has lived long enough to be acquainted with men and
+things, and the country with him.--But on the monarchial plan (exclusive
+of the numerous chances there are against every man born into the world,
+of drawing a prize in the lottery of human faculties), the next in
+succession, whatever he may be, is put at the head of a nation, and of
+a government, at the age of eighteen years. Does this appear like an
+action of wisdom? Is it consistent with the proper dignity and the manly
+character of a nation? Where is the propriety of calling such a lad the
+father of the people?--In all other cases, a person is a minor until the
+age of twenty-one years. Before this period, he is not trusted with the
+management of an acre of land, or with the heritable property of a flock
+of sheep, or an herd of swine; but, wonderful to tell! he may, at the
+age of eighteen years, be trusted with a nation.
+
+That monarchy is all a bubble, a mere court artifice to procure money,
+is evident (at least to me) in every character in which it can be
+viewed. It would be impossible, on the rational system of representative
+government, to make out a bill of expenses to such an enormous amount
+as this deception admits. Government is not of itself a very chargeable
+institution. The whole expense of the federal government of America,
+founded, as I have already said, on the system of representation, and
+extending over a country nearly ten times as large as England, is but
+six hundred thousand dollars, or one hundred and thirty-five thousand
+pounds sterling.
+
+I presume that no man in his sober senses will compare the character
+of any of the kings of Europe with that of General Washington. Yet, in
+France, and also in England, the expense of the civil list only, for the
+support of one man, is eight times greater than the whole expense of
+the federal government in America. To assign a reason for this, appears
+almost impossible. The generality of people in America, especially the
+poor, are more able to pay taxes, than the generality of people either
+in France or England.
+
+But the case is, that the representative system diffuses such a body
+of knowledge throughout a nation, on the subject of government, as to
+explode ignorance and preclude imposition. The craft of courts cannot be
+acted on that ground. There is no place for mystery; nowhere for it
+to begin. Those who are not in the representation, know as much of
+the nature of business as those who are. An affectation of mysterious
+importance would there be scouted. Nations can have no secrets; and the
+secrets of courts, like those of individuals, are always their defects.
+
+In the representative system, the reason for everything must publicly
+appear. Every man is a proprietor in government, and considers it a
+necessary part of his business to understand. It concerns his interest,
+because it affects his property. He examines the cost, and compares it
+with the advantages; and above all, he does not adopt the slavish custom
+of following what in other governments are called Leaders.
+
+It can only be by blinding the understanding of man, and making him
+believe that government is some wonderful mysterious thing, that
+excessive revenues are obtained. Monarchy is well calculated to ensure
+this end. It is the popery of government; a thing kept up to amuse the
+ignorant, and quiet them into taxes.
+
+The government of a free country, properly speaking, is not in the
+persons, but in the laws. The enacting of those requires no great
+expense; and when they are administered, the whole of civil government
+is performed--the rest is all court contrivance.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER IV. OF CONSTITUTIONS
+
+That men mean distinct and separate things when they speak of
+constitutions and of governments, is evident; or why are those terms
+distinctly and separately used? A constitution is not the act of a
+government, but of a people constituting a government; and government
+without a constitution, is power without a right.
+
+All power exercised over a nation, must have some beginning. It
+must either be delegated or assumed. There are no other sources. All
+delegated power is trust, and all assumed power is usurpation. Time does
+not alter the nature and quality of either.
+
+In viewing this subject, the case and circumstances of America present
+themselves as in the beginning of a world; and our enquiry into the
+origin of government is shortened, by referring to the facts that have
+arisen in our own day. We have no occasion to roam for information into
+the obscure field of antiquity, nor hazard ourselves upon conjecture.
+We are brought at once to the point of seeing government begin, as if we
+had lived in the beginning of time. The real volume, not of history,
+but of facts, is directly before us, unmutilated by contrivance, or the
+errors of tradition.
+
+I will here concisely state the commencement of the American
+constitutions; by which the difference between constitutions and
+governments will sufficiently appear.
+
+It may not appear improper to remind the reader that the United
+States of America consist of thirteen separate states, each of
+which established a government for itself, after the declaration of
+independence, done the 4th of July, 1776. Each state acted independently
+of the rest, in forming its governments; but the same general principle
+pervades the whole. When the several state governments were formed, they
+proceeded to form the federal government, that acts over the whole in
+all matters which concern the interest of the whole, or which relate to
+the intercourse of the several states with each other, or with foreign
+nations. I will begin with giving an instance from one of the state
+governments (that of Pennsylvania) and then proceed to the federal
+government.
+
+The state of Pennsylvania, though nearly of the same extent of territory
+as England, was then divided into only twelve counties. Each of those
+counties had elected a committee at the commencement of the dispute with
+the English government; and as the city of Philadelphia, which also
+had its committee, was the most central for intelligence, it became
+the center of communication to the several country committees. When
+it became necessary to proceed to the formation of a government, the
+committee of Philadelphia proposed a conference of all the committees,
+to be held in that city, and which met the latter end of July, 1776.
+
+Though these committees had been duly elected by the people, they were
+not elected expressly for the purpose, nor invested with the authority
+of forming a constitution; and as they could not, consistently with the
+American idea of rights, assume such a power, they could only confer
+upon the matter, and put it into a train of operation. The conferees,
+therefore, did no more than state the case, and recommend to the several
+counties to elect six representatives for each county, to meet in
+convention at Philadelphia, with powers to form a constitution, and
+propose it for public consideration.
+
+This convention, of which Benjamin Franklin was president, having met
+and deliberated, and agreed upon a constitution, they next ordered it to
+be published, not as a thing established, but for the consideration of
+the whole people, their approbation or rejection, and then adjourned to
+a stated time. When the time of adjournment was expired, the convention
+re-assembled; and as the general opinion of the people in approbation of
+it was then known, the constitution was signed, sealed, and proclaimed
+on the authority of the people and the original instrument deposited
+as a public record. The convention then appointed a day for the general
+election of the representatives who were to compose the government, and
+the time it should commence; and having done this they dissolved, and
+returned to their several homes and occupations.
+
+In this constitution were laid down, first, a declaration of rights;
+then followed the form which the government should have, and the powers
+it should possess--the authority of the courts of judicature, and of
+juries--the manner in which elections should be conducted, and the
+proportion of representatives to the number of electors--the time which
+each succeeding assembly should continue, which was one year--the mode
+of levying, and of accounting for the expenditure, of public money--of
+appointing public officers, etc., etc., etc.
+
+No article of this constitution could be altered or infringed at
+the discretion of the government that was to ensue. It was to that
+government a law. But as it would have been unwise to preclude the
+benefit of experience, and in order also to prevent the accumulation of
+errors, if any should be found, and to preserve an unison of government
+with the circumstances of the state at all times, the constitution
+provided that, at the expiration of every seven years, a convention
+should be elected, for the express purpose of revising the constitution,
+and making alterations, additions, or abolitions therein, if any such
+should be found necessary.
+
+Here we see a regular process--a government issuing out of a
+constitution, formed by the people in their original character; and that
+constitution serving, not only as an authority, but as a law of control
+to the government. It was the political bible of the state. Scarcely a
+family was without it. Every member of the government had a copy; and
+nothing was more common, when any debate arose on the principle of a
+bill, or on the extent of any species of authority, than for the members
+to take the printed constitution out of their pocket, and read the
+chapter with which such matter in debate was connected.
+
+Having thus given an instance from one of the states, I will show the
+proceedings by which the federal constitution of the United States arose
+and was formed.
+
+Congress, at its two first meetings, in September 1774, and May 1775,
+was nothing more than a deputation from the legislatures of the several
+provinces, afterwards states; and had no other authority than what arose
+from common consent, and the necessity of its acting as a public body.
+In everything which related to the internal affairs of America, congress
+went no further than to issue recommendations to the several provincial
+assemblies, who at discretion adopted them or not. Nothing on the
+part of congress was compulsive; yet, in this situation, it was more
+faithfully and affectionately obeyed than was any government in
+Europe. This instance, like that of the national assembly in France,
+sufficiently shows, that the strength of government does not consist in
+any thing itself, but in the attachment of a nation, and the interest
+which a people feel in supporting it. When this is lost, government is
+but a child in power; and though, like the old government in France, it
+may harass individuals for a while, it but facilitates its own fall.
+
+After the declaration of independence, it became consistent with the
+principle on which representative government is founded, that the
+authority of congress should be defined and established. Whether that
+authority should be more or less than congress then discretionarily
+exercised was not the question. It was merely the rectitude of the
+measure.
+
+For this purpose, the act, called the act of confederation (which was a
+sort of imperfect federal constitution), was proposed, and, after long
+deliberation, was concluded in the year 1781. It was not the act of
+congress, because it is repugnant to the principles of representative
+government that a body should give power to itself. Congress first
+informed the several states, of the powers which it conceived were
+necessary to be invested in the union, to enable it to perform the
+duties and services required from it; and the states severally agreed
+with each other, and concentrated in congress those powers.
+
+It may not be improper to observe that in both those instances (the one
+of Pennsylvania, and the other of the United States), there is no such
+thing as the idea of a compact between the people on one side, and the
+government on the other. The compact was that of the people with each
+other, to produce and constitute a government. To suppose that any
+government can be a party in a compact with the whole people, is to
+suppose it to have existence before it can have a right to exist. The
+only instance in which a compact can take place between the people and
+those who exercise the government, is, that the people shall pay them,
+while they choose to employ them.
+
+Government is not a trade which any man, or any body of men, has a right
+to set up and exercise for his own emolument, but is altogether a trust,
+in right of those by whom that trust is delegated, and by whom it is
+always resumeable. It has of itself no rights; they are altogether
+duties.
+
+Having thus given two instances of the original formation of a
+constitution, I will show the manner in which both have been changed
+since their first establishment.
+
+The powers vested in the governments of the several states, by the state
+constitutions, were found, upon experience, to be too great; and those
+vested in the federal government, by the act of confederation, too
+little. The defect was not in the principle, but in the distribution of
+power.
+
+Numerous publications, in pamphlets and in the newspapers, appeared,
+on the propriety and necessity of new modelling the federal government.
+After some time of public discussion, carried on through the channel
+of the press, and in conversations, the state of Virginia, experiencing
+some inconvenience with respect to commerce, proposed holding a
+continental conference; in consequence of which, a deputation from five
+or six state assemblies met at Annapolis, in Maryland, in 1786. This
+meeting, not conceiving itself sufficiently authorised to go into the
+business of a reform, did no more than state their general opinions of
+the propriety of the measure, and recommend that a convention of all the
+states should be held the year following.
+
+The convention met at Philadelphia in May, 1787, of which General
+Washington was elected president. He was not at that time connected
+with any of the state governments, or with congress. He delivered up
+his commission when the war ended, and since then had lived a private
+citizen.
+
+The convention went deeply into all the subjects; and having, after a
+variety of debate and investigation, agreed among themselves upon the
+several parts of a federal constitution, the next question was, the
+manner of giving it authority and practice.
+
+For this purpose they did not, like a cabal of courtiers, send for a
+Dutch Stadtholder, or a German Elector; but they referred the whole
+matter to the sense and interest of the country.
+
+They first directed that the proposed constitution should be published.
+Secondly, that each state should elect a convention, expressly for the
+purpose of taking it into consideration, and of ratifying or rejecting
+it; and that as soon as the approbation and ratification of any nine
+states should be given, that those states shall proceed to the election
+of their proportion of members to the new federal government; and that
+the operation of it should then begin, and the former federal government
+cease.
+
+The several states proceeded accordingly to elect their conventions.
+Some of those conventions ratified the constitution by very large
+majorities, and two or three unanimously. In others there were much
+debate and division of opinion. In the Massachusetts convention, which
+met at Boston, the majority was not above nineteen or twenty, in
+about three hundred members; but such is the nature of representative
+government, that it quietly decides all matters by majority. After the
+debate in the Massachusetts convention was closed, and the vote taken,
+the objecting members rose and declared, "That though they had argued
+and voted against it, because certain parts appeared to them in a
+different light to what they appeared to other members; yet, as the vote
+had decided in favour of the constitution as proposed, they should give
+it the same practical support as if they had for it."
+
+As soon as nine states had concurred (and the rest followed in the
+order their conventions were elected), the old fabric of the federal
+government was taken down, and the new one erected, of which General
+Washington is president.--In this place I cannot help remarking, that
+the character and services of this gentleman are sufficient to put all
+those men called kings to shame. While they are receiving from the sweat
+and labours of mankind, a prodigality of pay, to which neither their
+abilities nor their services can entitle them, he is rendering every
+service in his power, and refusing every pecuniary reward. He accepted
+no pay as commander-in-chief; he accepts none as president of the United
+States.
+
+After the new federal constitution was established, the state of
+Pennsylvania, conceiving that some parts of its own constitution
+required to be altered, elected a convention for that purpose. The
+proposed alterations were published, and the people concurring therein,
+they were established.
+
+In forming those constitutions, or in altering them, little or no
+inconvenience took place. The ordinary course of things was not
+interrupted, and the advantages have been much. It is always the
+interest of a far greater number of people in a nation to have things
+right, than to let them remain wrong; and when public matters are open
+to debate, and the public judgment free, it will not decide wrong,
+unless it decides too hastily.
+
+In the two instances of changing the constitutions, the governments then
+in being were not actors either way. Government has no right to make
+itself a party in any debate respecting the principles or modes of
+forming, or of changing, constitutions. It is not for the benefit of
+those who exercise the powers of government that constitutions, and the
+governments issuing from them, are established. In all those matters the
+right of judging and acting are in those who pay, and not in those who
+receive.
+
+A constitution is the property of a nation, and not of those who
+exercise the government. All the constitutions of America are declared
+to be established on the authority of the people. In France, the word
+nation is used instead of the people; but in both cases, a constitution
+is a thing antecedent to the government, and always distinct there from.
+
+In England it is not difficult to perceive that everything has a
+constitution, except the nation. Every society and association that is
+established, first agreed upon a number of original articles, digested
+into form, which are its constitution. It then appointed its officers,
+whose powers and authorities are described in that constitution, and the
+government of that society then commenced. Those officers, by whatever
+name they are called, have no authority to add to, alter, or abridge the
+original articles. It is only to the constituting power that this right
+belongs.
+
+From the want of understanding the difference between a constitution
+and a government, Dr. Johnson, and all writers of his description, have
+always bewildered themselves. They could not but perceive, that there
+must necessarily be a controlling power existing somewhere, and they
+placed this power in the discretion of the persons exercising the
+government, instead of placing it in a constitution formed by the
+nation. When it is in a constitution, it has the nation for its support,
+and the natural and the political controlling powers are together. The
+laws which are enacted by governments, control men only as individuals,
+but the nation, through its constitution, controls the whole government,
+and has a natural ability to do so. The final controlling power,
+therefore, and the original constituting power, are one and the same
+power.
+
+Dr. Johnson could not have advanced such a position in any country where
+there was a constitution; and he is himself an evidence that no such
+thing as a constitution exists in England. But it may be put as a
+question, not improper to be investigated, that if a constitution does
+not exist, how came the idea of its existence so generally established?
+
+In order to decide this question, it is necessary to consider a
+constitution in both its cases:--First, as creating a government and
+giving it powers. Secondly, as regulating and restraining the powers so
+given.
+
+If we begin with William of Normandy, we find that the government of
+England was originally a tyranny, founded on an invasion and conquest of
+the country. This being admitted, it will then appear, that the exertion
+of the nation, at different periods, to abate that tyranny, and render
+it less intolerable, has been credited for a constitution.
+
+Magna Charta, as it was called (it is now like an almanack of the same
+date), was no more than compelling the government to renounce a part of
+its assumptions. It did not create and give powers to government in a
+manner a constitution does; but was, as far as it went, of the nature of
+a re-conquest, and not a constitution; for could the nation have totally
+expelled the usurpation, as France has done its despotism, it would then
+have had a constitution to form.
+
+The history of the Edwards and the Henries, and up to the commencement
+of the Stuarts, exhibits as many instances of tyranny as could be acted
+within the limits to which the nation had restricted it. The Stuarts
+endeavoured to pass those limits, and their fate is well known. In
+all those instances we see nothing of a constitution, but only of
+restrictions on assumed power.
+
+After this, another William, descended from the same stock, and claiming
+from the same origin, gained possession; and of the two evils, James
+and William, the nation preferred what it thought the least; since, from
+circumstances, it must take one. The act, called the Bill of Rights,
+comes here into view. What is it, but a bargain, which the parts of
+the government made with each other to divide powers, profits, and
+privileges? You shall have so much, and I will have the rest; and with
+respect to the nation, it said, for your share, You shall have the right
+of petitioning. This being the case, the bill of rights is more properly
+a bill of wrongs, and of insult. As to what is called the convention
+parliament, it was a thing that made itself, and then made the authority
+by which it acted. A few persons got together, and called themselves by
+that name. Several of them had never been elected, and none of them for
+the purpose.
+
+From the time of William a species of government arose, issuing out
+of this coalition bill of rights; and more so, since the corruption
+introduced at the Hanover succession by the agency of Walpole; that can
+be described by no other name than a despotic legislation. Though the
+parts may embarrass each other, the whole has no bounds; and the only
+right it acknowledges out of itself, is the right of petitioning. Where
+then is the constitution either that gives or restrains power?
+
+It is not because a part of the government is elective, that makes it
+less a despotism, if the persons so elected possess afterwards, as a
+parliament, unlimited powers. Election, in this case, becomes separated
+from representation, and the candidates are candidates for despotism.
+
+I cannot believe that any nation, reasoning on its own rights, would
+have thought of calling these things a constitution, if the cry of
+constitution had not been set up by the government. It has got into
+circulation like the words bore and quoz [quiz], by being chalked up in
+the speeches of parliament, as those words were on window shutters and
+doorposts; but whatever the constitution may be in other respects, it
+has undoubtedly been the most productive machine of taxation that was
+ever invented. The taxes in France, under the new constitution, are not
+quite thirteen shillings per head,*[18] and the taxes in England, under
+what is called its present constitution, are forty-eight shillings
+and sixpence per head--men, women, and children--amounting to nearly
+seventeen millions sterling, besides the expense of collecting, which is
+upwards of a million more.
+
+In a country like England, where the whole of the civil Government is
+executed by the people of every town and county, by means of parish
+officers, magistrates, quarterly sessions, juries, and assize; without
+any trouble to what is called the government or any other expense to the
+revenue than the salary of the judges, it is astonishing how such a mass
+of taxes can be employed. Not even the internal defence of the country
+is paid out of the revenue. On all occasions, whether real or contrived,
+recourse is continually had to new loans and new taxes. No wonder,
+then, that a machine of government so advantageous to the advocates of
+a court, should be so triumphantly extolled! No wonder, that St. James's
+or St. Stephen's should echo with the continual cry of constitution;
+no wonder, that the French revolution should be reprobated, and the
+res-publica treated with reproach! The red book of England, like the red
+book of France, will explain the reason.*[19]
+
+I will now, by way of relaxation, turn a thought or two to Mr. Burke. I
+ask his pardon for neglecting him so long.
+
+"America," says he (in his speech on the Canada Constitution bill),
+"never dreamed of such absurd doctrine as the Rights of Man."
+
+Mr. Burke is such a bold presumer, and advances his assertions and his
+premises with such a deficiency of judgment, that, without troubling
+ourselves about principles of philosophy or politics, the mere logical
+conclusions they produce, are ridiculous. For instance,
+
+If governments, as Mr. Burke asserts, are not founded on the Rights of
+Man, and are founded on any rights at all, they consequently must be
+founded on the right of something that is not man. What then is that
+something?
+
+Generally speaking, we know of no other creatures that inhabit the
+earth than man and beast; and in all cases, where only two things offer
+themselves, and one must be admitted, a negation proved on any one,
+amounts to an affirmative on the other; and therefore, Mr. Burke, by
+proving against the Rights of Man, proves in behalf of the beast; and
+consequently, proves that government is a beast; and as difficult things
+sometimes explain each other, we now see the origin of keeping wild
+beasts in the Tower; for they certainly can be of no other use than
+to show the origin of the government. They are in the place of a
+constitution. O John Bull, what honours thou hast lost by not being a
+wild beast. Thou mightest, on Mr. Burke's system, have been in the Tower
+for life.
+
+If Mr. Burke's arguments have not weight enough to keep one serious, the
+fault is less mine than his; and as I am willing to make an apology to
+the reader for the liberty I have taken, I hope Mr. Burke will also make
+his for giving the cause.
+
+Having thus paid Mr. Burke the compliment of remembering him, I return
+to the subject.
+
+From the want of a constitution in England to restrain and regulate the
+wild impulse of power, many of the laws are irrational and tyrannical,
+and the administration of them vague and problematical.
+
+The attention of the government of England (for I rather choose to
+call it by this name than the English government) appears, since its
+political connection with Germany, to have been so completely engrossed
+and absorbed by foreign affairs, and the means of raising taxes, that it
+seems to exist for no other purposes. Domestic concerns are neglected;
+and with respect to regular law, there is scarcely such a thing.
+
+Almost every case must now be determined by some precedent, be that
+precedent good or bad, or whether it properly applies or not; and
+the practice is become so general as to suggest a suspicion, that it
+proceeds from a deeper policy than at first sight appears.
+
+Since the revolution of America, and more so since that of France,
+this preaching up the doctrines of precedents, drawn from times and
+circumstances antecedent to those events, has been the studied practice
+of the English government. The generality of those precedents are
+founded on principles and opinions, the reverse of what they ought; and
+the greater distance of time they are drawn from, the more they are to
+be suspected. But by associating those precedents with a superstitious
+reverence for ancient things, as monks show relics and call them holy,
+the generality of mankind are deceived into the design. Governments now
+act as if they were afraid to awaken a single reflection in man. They
+are softly leading him to the sepulchre of precedents, to deaden his
+faculties and call attention from the scene of revolutions. They feel
+that he is arriving at knowledge faster than they wish, and their policy
+of precedents is the barometer of their fears. This political popery,
+like the ecclesiastical popery of old, has had its day, and is hastening
+to its exit. The ragged relic and the antiquated precedent, the monk and
+the monarch, will moulder together.
+
+Government by precedent, without any regard to the principle of the
+precedent, is one of the vilest systems that can be set up. In numerous
+instances, the precedent ought to operate as a warning, and not as an
+example, and requires to be shunned instead of imitated; but instead of
+this, precedents are taken in the lump, and put at once for constitution
+and for law.
+
+Either the doctrine of precedents is policy to keep a man in a state of
+ignorance, or it is a practical confession that wisdom degenerates in
+governments as governments increase in age, and can only hobble along by
+the stilts and crutches of precedents. How is it that the same persons
+who would proudly be thought wiser than their predecessors, appear at
+the same time only as the ghosts of departed wisdom? How strangely is
+antiquity treated! To some purposes it is spoken of as the times of
+darkness and ignorance, and to answer others, it is put for the light of
+the world.
+
+If the doctrine of precedents is to be followed, the expenses of
+government need not continue the same. Why pay men extravagantly, who
+have but little to do? If everything that can happen is already in
+precedent, legislation is at an end, and precedent, like a dictionary,
+determines every case. Either, therefore, government has arrived at
+its dotage, and requires to be renovated, or all the occasions for
+exercising its wisdom have occurred.
+
+We now see all over Europe, and particularly in England, the curious
+phenomenon of a nation looking one way, and the government the
+other--the one forward and the other backward. If governments are to go
+on by precedent, while nations go on by improvement, they must at last
+come to a final separation; and the sooner, and the more civilly they
+determine this point, the better.*[20]
+
+Having thus spoken of constitutions generally, as things distinct from
+actual governments, let us proceed to consider the parts of which a
+constitution is composed.
+
+Opinions differ more on this subject than with respect to the whole.
+That a nation ought to have a constitution, as a rule for the conduct
+of its government, is a simple question in which all men, not directly
+courtiers, will agree. It is only on the component parts that questions
+and opinions multiply.
+
+But this difficulty, like every other, will diminish when put into a
+train of being rightly understood.
+
+The first thing is, that a nation has a right to establish a
+constitution.
+
+Whether it exercises this right in the most judicious manner at first
+is quite another case. It exercises it agreeably to the judgment it
+possesses; and by continuing to do so, all errors will at last be
+exploded.
+
+When this right is established in a nation, there is no fear that it
+will be employed to its own injury. A nation can have no interest in
+being wrong.
+
+Though all the constitutions of America are on one general principle,
+yet no two of them are exactly alike in their component parts, or in the
+distribution of the powers which they give to the actual governments.
+Some are more, and others less complex.
+
+In forming a constitution, it is first necessary to consider what are
+the ends for which government is necessary? Secondly, what are the best
+means, and the least expensive, for accomplishing those ends?
+
+Government is nothing more than a national association; and the
+object of this association is the good of all, as well individually as
+collectively. Every man wishes to pursue his occupation, and to enjoy
+the fruits of his labours and the produce of his property in peace
+and safety, and with the least possible expense. When these things
+are accomplished, all the objects for which government ought to be
+established are answered.
+
+It has been customary to consider government under three distinct
+general heads. The legislative, the executive, and the judicial.
+
+But if we permit our judgment to act unincumbered by the habit of
+multiplied terms, we can perceive no more than two divisions of power,
+of which civil government is composed, namely, that of legislating or
+enacting laws, and that of executing or administering them. Everything,
+therefore, appertaining to civil government, classes itself under one or
+other of these two divisions.
+
+So far as regards the execution of the laws, that which is called the
+judicial power, is strictly and properly the executive power of every
+country. It is that power to which every individual has appeal, and
+which causes the laws to be executed; neither have we any other clear
+idea with respect to the official execution of the laws. In England, and
+also in America and France, this power begins with the magistrate, and
+proceeds up through all the courts of judicature.
+
+I leave to courtiers to explain what is meant by calling monarchy the
+executive power. It is merely a name in which acts of government are
+done; and any other, or none at all, would answer the same purpose. Laws
+have neither more nor less authority on this account. It must be from
+the justness of their principles, and the interest which a nation feels
+therein, that they derive support; if they require any other than this,
+it is a sign that something in the system of government is imperfect.
+Laws difficult to be executed cannot be generally good.
+
+With respect to the organization of the legislative power, different
+modes have been adopted in different countries. In America it is
+generally composed of two houses. In France it consists but of one, but
+in both countries, it is wholly by representation.
+
+The case is, that mankind (from the long tyranny of assumed power) have
+had so few opportunities of making the necessary trials on modes and
+principles of government, in order to discover the best, that government
+is but now beginning to be known, and experience is yet wanting to
+determine many particulars.
+
+The objections against two houses are, first, that there is an
+inconsistency in any part of a whole legislature, coming to a final
+determination by vote on any matter, whilst that matter, with respect
+to that whole, is yet only in a train of deliberation, and consequently
+open to new illustrations.
+
+Secondly, That by taking the vote on each, as a separate body, it always
+admits of the possibility, and is often the case in practice, that the
+minority governs the majority, and that, in some instances, to a degree
+of great inconsistency.
+
+Thirdly, That two houses arbitrarily checking or controlling each other
+is inconsistent; because it cannot be proved on the principles of just
+representation, that either should be wiser or better than the other.
+They may check in the wrong as well as in the right therefore to give
+the power where we cannot give the wisdom to use it, nor be assured
+of its being rightly used, renders the hazard at least equal to the
+precaution.*[21]
+
+The objection against a single house is, that it is always in a
+condition of committing itself too soon.--But it should at the same
+time be remembered, that when there is a constitution which defines the
+power, and establishes the principles within which a legislature
+shall act, there is already a more effectual check provided, and more
+powerfully operating, than any other check can be. For example,
+
+Were a Bill to be brought into any of the American legislatures similar
+to that which was passed into an act by the English parliament, at
+the commencement of George the First, to extend the duration of the
+assemblies to a longer period than they now sit, the check is in the
+constitution, which in effect says, Thus far shalt thou go and no
+further.
+
+But in order to remove the objection against a single house (that of
+acting with too quick an impulse), and at the same time to avoid the
+inconsistencies, in some cases absurdities, arising from two houses, the
+following method has been proposed as an improvement upon both.
+
+First, To have but one representation.
+
+Secondly, To divide that representation, by lot, into two or three
+parts.
+
+Thirdly, That every proposed bill shall be first debated in those parts
+by succession, that they may become the hearers of each other, but
+without taking any vote. After which the whole representation to
+assemble for a general debate and determination by vote.
+
+To this proposed improvement has been added another, for the purpose of
+keeping the representation in the state of constant renovation; which
+is, that one-third of the representation of each county, shall go out at
+the expiration of one year, and the number be replaced by new elections.
+Another third at the expiration of the second year replaced in like
+manner, and every third year to be a general election.*[22]
+
+But in whatever manner the separate parts of a constitution may be
+arranged, there is one general principle that distinguishes freedom from
+slavery, which is, that all hereditary government over a people is to
+them a species of slavery, and representative government is freedom.
+
+Considering government in the only light in which it should be
+considered, that of a National Association, it ought to be so
+constructed as not to be disordered by any accident happening among the
+parts; and, therefore, no extraordinary power, capable of producing such
+an effect, should be lodged in the hands of any individual. The death,
+sickness, absence or defection, of any one individual in a government,
+ought to be a matter of no more consequence, with respect to the nation,
+than if the same circumstance had taken place in a member of the English
+Parliament, or the French National Assembly.
+
+Scarcely anything presents a more degrading character of national
+greatness, than its being thrown into confusion, by anything happening
+to or acted by any individual; and the ridiculousness of the scene is
+often increased by the natural insignificance of the person by whom it
+is occasioned. Were a government so constructed, that it could not go on
+unless a goose or a gander were present in the senate, the difficulties
+would be just as great and as real, on the flight or sickness of
+the goose, or the gander, as if it were called a King. We laugh at
+individuals for the silly difficulties they make to themselves, without
+perceiving that the greatest of all ridiculous things are acted in
+governments.*[23]
+
+All the constitutions of America are on a plan that excludes the
+childish embarrassments which occur in monarchical countries. No
+suspension of government can there take place for a moment, from any
+circumstances whatever. The system of representation provides for
+everything, and is the only system in which nations and governments can
+always appear in their proper character.
+
+As extraordinary power ought not to be lodged in the hands of any
+individual, so ought there to be no appropriations of public money
+to any person, beyond what his services in a state may be worth. It
+signifies not whether a man be called a president, a king, an emperor,
+a senator, or by any other name which propriety or folly may devise or
+arrogance assume; it is only a certain service he can perform in the
+state; and the service of any such individual in the routine of office,
+whether such office be called monarchical, presidential, senatorial, or
+by any other name or title, can never exceed the value of ten thousand
+pounds a year. All the great services that are done in the world are
+performed by volunteer characters, who accept nothing for them; but
+the routine of office is always regulated to such a general standard
+of abilities as to be within the compass of numbers in every country
+to perform, and therefore cannot merit very extraordinary recompense.
+Government, says Swift, is a Plain thing, and fitted to the capacity of
+many heads.
+
+It is inhuman to talk of a million sterling a year, paid out of the
+public taxes of any country, for the support of any individual, whilst
+thousands who are forced to contribute thereto, are pining with want,
+and struggling with misery. Government does not consist in a contrast
+between prisons and palaces, between poverty and pomp; it is not
+instituted to rob the needy of his mite, and increase the wretchedness
+of the wretched.--But on this part of the subject I shall speak
+hereafter, and confine myself at present to political observations.
+
+When extraordinary power and extraordinary pay are allotted to any
+individual in a government, he becomes the center, round which every
+kind of corruption generates and forms. Give to any man a million a
+year, and add thereto the power of creating and disposing of places,
+at the expense of a country, and the liberties of that country are no
+longer secure. What is called the splendour of a throne is no other
+than the corruption of the state. It is made up of a band of parasites,
+living in luxurious indolence, out of the public taxes.
+
+When once such a vicious system is established it becomes the guard and
+protection of all inferior abuses. The man who is in the receipt of a
+million a year is the last person to promote a spirit of reform, lest,
+in the event, it should reach to himself. It is always his interest to
+defend inferior abuses, as so many outworks to protect the citadel; and
+on this species of political fortification, all the parts have such a
+common dependence that it is never to be expected they will attack each
+other.*[24]
+
+Monarchy would not have continued so many ages in the world, had it not
+been for the abuses it protects. It is the master-fraud, which shelters
+all others. By admitting a participation of the spoil, it makes itself
+friends; and when it ceases to do this it will cease to be the idol of
+courtiers.
+
+As the principle on which constitutions are now formed rejects all
+hereditary pretensions to government, it also rejects all that catalogue
+of assumptions known by the name of prerogatives.
+
+If there is any government where prerogatives might with apparent safety
+be entrusted to any individual, it is in the federal government of
+America. The president of the United States of America is elected only
+for four years. He is not only responsible in the general sense of the
+word, but a particular mode is laid down in the constitution for trying
+him. He cannot be elected under thirty-five years of age; and he must be
+a native of the country.
+
+In a comparison of these cases with the Government of England, the
+difference when applied to the latter amounts to an absurdity. In
+England the person who exercises prerogative is often a foreigner;
+always half a foreigner, and always married to a foreigner. He is
+never in full natural or political connection with the country, is not
+responsible for anything, and becomes of age at eighteen years; yet
+such a person is permitted to form foreign alliances, without even the
+knowledge of the nation, and to make war and peace without its consent.
+
+But this is not all. Though such a person cannot dispose of the
+government in the manner of a testator, he dictates the marriage
+connections, which, in effect, accomplish a great part of the same end.
+He cannot directly bequeath half the government to Prussia, but he can
+form a marriage partnership that will produce almost the same thing.
+Under such circumstances, it is happy for England that she is not
+situated on the Continent, or she might, like Holland, fall under
+the dictatorship of Prussia. Holland, by marriage, is as effectually
+governed by Prussia, as if the old tyranny of bequeathing the government
+had been the means.
+
+The presidency in America (or, as it is sometimes called, the executive)
+is the only office from which a foreigner is excluded, and in England it
+is the only one to which he is admitted. A foreigner cannot be a member
+of Parliament, but he may be what is called a king. If there is any
+reason for excluding foreigners, it ought to be from those offices where
+mischief can most be acted, and where, by uniting every bias of interest
+and attachment, the trust is best secured. But as nations proceed in
+the great business of forming constitutions, they will examine with
+more precision into the nature and business of that department which is
+called the executive. What the legislative and judicial departments are
+every one can see; but with respect to what, in Europe, is called
+the executive, as distinct from those two, it is either a political
+superfluity or a chaos of unknown things.
+
+Some kind of official department, to which reports shall be made from
+the different parts of a nation, or from abroad, to be laid before the
+national representatives, is all that is necessary; but there is no
+consistency in calling this the executive; neither can it be considered
+in any other light than as inferior to the legislative. The sovereign
+authority in any country is the power of making laws, and everything
+else is an official department.
+
+Next to the arrangement of the principles and the organization of the
+several parts of a constitution, is the provision to be made for
+the support of the persons to whom the nation shall confide the
+administration of the constitutional powers.
+
+A nation can have no right to the time and services of any person at his
+own expense, whom it may choose to employ or entrust in any department
+whatever; neither can any reason be given for making provision for the
+support of any one part of a government and not for the other.
+
+But admitting that the honour of being entrusted with any part of a
+government is to be considered a sufficient reward, it ought to be so to
+every person alike. If the members of the legislature of any country
+are to serve at their own expense that which is called the executive,
+whether monarchical or by any other name, ought to serve in like manner.
+It is inconsistent to pay the one, and accept the service of the other
+gratis.
+
+In America, every department in the government is decently provided for;
+but no one is extravagantly paid. Every member of Congress, and of
+the Assemblies, is allowed a sufficiency for his expenses. Whereas in
+England, a most prodigal provision is made for the support of one part
+of the Government, and none for the other, the consequence of which is
+that the one is furnished with the means of corruption and the other is
+put into the condition of being corrupted. Less than a fourth part of
+such expense, applied as it is in America, would remedy a great part of
+the corruption.
+
+Another reform in the American constitution is the exploding all oaths
+of personality. The oath of allegiance in America is to the nation only.
+The putting any individual as a figure for a nation is improper.
+The happiness of a nation is the superior object, and therefore the
+intention of an oath of allegiance ought not to be obscured by being
+figuratively taken, to, or in the name of, any person. The oath, called
+the civic oath, in France, viz., "the nation, the law, and the king," is
+improper. If taken at all, it ought to be as in America, to the nation
+only. The law may or may not be good; but, in this place, it can have no
+other meaning, than as being conducive to the happiness of a nation, and
+therefore is included in it. The remainder of the oath is improper, on
+the ground, that all personal oaths ought to be abolished. They are the
+remains of tyranny on one part and slavery on the other; and the name of
+the Creator ought not to be introduced to witness the degradation of
+his creation; or if taken, as is already mentioned, as figurative of the
+nation, it is in this place redundant. But whatever apology may be made
+for oaths at the first establishment of a government, they ought not to
+be permitted afterwards. If a government requires the support of oaths,
+it is a sign that it is not worth supporting, and ought not to be
+supported. Make government what it ought to be, and it will support
+itself.
+
+To conclude this part of the subject:--One of the greatest improvements
+that have been made for the perpetual security and progress of
+constitutional liberty, is the provision which the new constitutions
+make for occasionally revising, altering, and amending them.
+
+The principle upon which Mr. Burke formed his political creed, that of
+"binding and controlling posterity to the end of time, and of renouncing
+and abdicating the rights of all posterity, for ever," is now become too
+detestable to be made a subject of debate; and therefore, I pass it over
+with no other notice than exposing it.
+
+Government is but now beginning to be known. Hitherto it has been the
+mere exercise of power, which forbade all effectual enquiry into rights,
+and grounded itself wholly on possession. While the enemy of liberty was
+its judge, the progress of its principles must have been small indeed.
+
+The constitutions of America, and also that of France, have either
+affixed a period for their revision, or laid down the mode by which
+improvement shall be made. It is perhaps impossible to establish
+anything that combines principles with opinions and practice, which the
+progress of circumstances, through a length of years, will not in some
+measure derange, or render inconsistent; and, therefore, to prevent
+inconveniences accumulating, till they discourage reformations or
+provoke revolutions, it is best to provide the means of regulating them
+as they occur. The Rights of Man are the rights of all generations of
+men, and cannot be monopolised by any. That which is worth following,
+will be followed for the sake of its worth, and it is in this that
+its security lies, and not in any conditions with which it may be
+encumbered. When a man leaves property to his heirs, he does not connect
+it with an obligation that they shall accept it. Why, then, should we
+do otherwise with respect to constitutions? The best constitution that
+could now be devised, consistent with the condition of the present
+moment, may be far short of that excellence which a few years may
+afford. There is a morning of reason rising upon man on the subject
+of government, that has not appeared before. As the barbarism of the
+present old governments expires, the moral conditions of nations with
+respect to each other will be changed. Man will not be brought up with
+the savage idea of considering his species as his enemy, because
+the accident of birth gave the individuals existence in countries
+distinguished by different names; and as constitutions have always some
+relation to external as well as to domestic circumstances, the means of
+benefitting by every change, foreign or domestic, should be a part
+of every constitution. We already see an alteration in the national
+disposition of England and France towards each other, which, when we
+look back to only a few years, is itself a Revolution. Who could have
+foreseen, or who could have believed, that a French National Assembly
+would ever have been a popular toast in England, or that a friendly
+alliance of the two nations should become the wish of either? It shows
+that man, were he not corrupted by governments, is naturally the friend
+of man, and that human nature is not of itself vicious. That spirit
+of jealousy and ferocity, which the governments of the two countries
+inspired, and which they rendered subservient to the purpose of
+taxation, is now yielding to the dictates of reason, interest, and
+humanity. The trade of courts is beginning to be understood, and the
+affectation of mystery, with all the artificial sorcery by which
+they imposed upon mankind, is on the decline. It has received its
+death-wound; and though it may linger, it will expire. Government ought
+to be as much open to improvement as anything which appertains to man,
+instead of which it has been monopolised from age to age, by the most
+ignorant and vicious of the human race. Need we any other proof of their
+wretched management, than the excess of debts and taxes with which every
+nation groans, and the quarrels into which they have precipitated the
+world? Just emerging from such a barbarous condition, it is too soon to
+determine to what extent of improvement government may yet be carried.
+For what we can foresee, all Europe may form but one great Republic, and
+man be free of the whole.
+
+
+
+
+CHAPTER V. WAYS AND MEANS OF IMPROVING THE CONDITION OF EUROPE
+
+INTERSPERSED WITH MISCELLANEOUS OBSERVATIONS
+
+In contemplating a subject that embraces with equatorial magnitude the
+whole region of humanity it is impossible to confine the pursuit in one
+single direction. It takes ground on every character and condition that
+appertains to man, and blends the individual, the nation, and the world.
+From a small spark, kindled in America, a flame has arisen not to be
+extinguished. Without consuming, like the Ultima Ratio Regum, it winds
+its progress from nation to nation, and conquers by a silent operation.
+Man finds himself changed, he scarcely perceives how. He acquires
+a knowledge of his rights by attending justly to his interest, and
+discovers in the event that the strength and powers of despotism consist
+wholly in the fear of resisting it, and that, in order "to be free, it
+is sufficient that he wills it."
+
+Having in all the preceding parts of this work endeavoured to establish
+a system of principles as a basis on which governments ought to be
+erected, I shall proceed in this, to the ways and means of rendering
+them into practice. But in order to introduce this part of the subject
+with more propriety, and stronger effect, some preliminary observations,
+deducible from, or connected with, those principles, are necessary.
+
+Whatever the form or constitution of government may be, it ought to have
+no other object than the general happiness. When, instead of this, it
+operates to create and increase wretchedness in any of the parts
+of society, it is on a wrong system, and reformation is necessary.
+Customary language has classed the condition of man under the two
+descriptions of civilised and uncivilised life. To the one it has
+ascribed felicity and affluence; to the other hardship and want. But,
+however our imagination may be impressed by painting and comparison,
+it is nevertheless true, that a great portion of mankind, in what are
+called civilised countries, are in a state of poverty and wretchedness,
+far below the condition of an Indian. I speak not of one country, but of
+all. It is so in England, it is so all over Europe. Let us enquire into
+the cause.
+
+It lies not in any natural defect in the principles of civilisation,
+but in preventing those principles having a universal operation; the
+consequence of which is, a perpetual system of war and expense,
+that drains the country, and defeats the general felicity of which
+civilisation is capable. All the European governments (France
+now excepted) are constructed not on the principle of universal
+civilisation, but on the reverse of it. So far as those governments
+relate to each other, they are in the same condition as we conceive of
+savage uncivilised life; they put themselves beyond the law as well
+of God as of man, and are, with respect to principle and reciprocal
+conduct, like so many individuals in a state of nature. The inhabitants
+of every country, under the civilisation of laws, easily civilise
+together, but governments being yet in an uncivilised state, and almost
+continually at war, they pervert the abundance which civilised life
+produces to carry on the uncivilised part to a greater extent. By thus
+engrafting the barbarism of government upon the internal civilisation of
+a country, it draws from the latter, and more especially from the poor,
+a great portion of those earnings, which should be applied to their
+own subsistence and comfort. Apart from all reflections of morality and
+philosophy, it is a melancholy fact that more than one-fourth of the
+labour of mankind is annually consumed by this barbarous system. What
+has served to continue this evil, is the pecuniary advantage which
+all the governments of Europe have found in keeping up this state of
+uncivilisation. It affords to them pretences for power, and revenue,
+for which there would be neither occasion nor apology, if the circle
+of civilisation were rendered complete. Civil government alone, or the
+government of laws, is not productive of pretences for many taxes; it
+operates at home, directly under the eye of the country, and precludes
+the possibility of much imposition. But when the scene is laid in
+the uncivilised contention of governments, the field of pretences is
+enlarged, and the country, being no longer a judge, is open to every
+imposition, which governments please to act. Not a thirtieth, scarcely
+a fortieth, part of the taxes which are raised in England are either
+occasioned by, or applied to, the purpose of civil government. It is
+not difficult to see, that the whole which the actual government does
+in this respect, is to enact laws, and that the country administers
+and executes them, at its own expense, by means of magistrates, juries,
+sessions, and assize, over and above the taxes which it pays. In this
+view of the case, we have two distinct characters of government; the one
+the civil government, or the government of laws, which operates at home,
+the other the court or cabinet government, which operates abroad, on the
+rude plan of uncivilised life; the one attended with little charge, the
+other with boundless extravagance; and so distinct are the two, that if
+the latter were to sink, as it were, by a sudden opening of the earth,
+and totally disappear, the former would not be deranged. It would still
+proceed, because it is the common interest of the nation that it should,
+and all the means are in practice. Revolutions, then, have for their
+object a change in the moral condition of governments, and with this
+change the burthen of public taxes will lessen, and civilisation will be
+left to the enjoyment of that abundance, of which it is now deprived.
+In contemplating the whole of this subject, I extend my views into the
+department of commerce. In all my publications, where the matter would
+admit, I have been an advocate for commerce, because I am a friend to
+its effects. It is a pacific system, operating to cordialise mankind, by
+rendering nations, as well as individuals, useful to each other. As to
+the mere theoretical reformation, I have never preached it up. The most
+effectual process is that of improving the condition of man by means of
+his interest; and it is on this ground that I take my stand. If commerce
+were permitted to act to the universal extent it is capable, it would
+extirpate the system of war, and produce a revolution in the uncivilised
+state of governments. The invention of commerce has arisen since those
+governments began, and is the greatest approach towards universal
+civilisation that has yet been made by any means not immediately flowing
+from moral principles. Whatever has a tendency to promote the civil
+intercourse of nations by an exchange of benefits, is a subject as
+worthy of philosophy as of politics. Commerce is no other than the
+traffic of two individuals, multiplied on a scale of numbers; and by the
+same rule that nature intended for the intercourse of two, she intended
+that of all. For this purpose she has distributed the materials of
+manufactures and commerce, in various and distant parts of a nation and
+of the world; and as they cannot be procured by war so cheaply or so
+commodiously as by commerce, she has rendered the latter the means
+of extirpating the former. As the two are nearly the opposite of each
+other, consequently, the uncivilised state of the European governments
+is injurious to commerce. Every kind of destruction or embarrassment
+serves to lessen the quantity, and it matters but little in what part
+of the commercial world the reduction begins. Like blood, it cannot be
+taken from any of the parts, without being taken from the whole mass in
+circulation, and all partake of the loss. When the ability in any
+nation to buy is destroyed, it equally involves the seller. Could the
+government of England destroy the commerce of all other nations, she
+would most effectually ruin her own. It is possible that a nation may be
+the carrier for the world, but she cannot be the merchant. She cannot
+be the seller and buyer of her own merchandise. The ability to buy must
+reside out of herself; and, therefore, the prosperity of any commercial
+nation is regulated by the prosperity of the rest. If they are poor she
+cannot be rich, and her condition, be what it may, is an index of the
+height of the commercial tide in other nations. That the principles
+of commerce, and its universal operation may be understood, without
+understanding the practice, is a position that reason will not deny; and
+it is on this ground only that I argue the subject. It is one thing
+in the counting-house, in the world it is another. With respect to its
+operation it must necessarily be contemplated as a reciprocal thing;
+that only one-half its powers resides within the nation, and that
+the whole is as effectually destroyed by the destroying the half that
+resides without, as if the destruction had been committed on that which
+is within; for neither can act without the other. When in the last, as
+well as in former wars, the commerce of England sunk, it was because the
+quantity was lessened everywhere; and it now rises, because commerce is
+in a rising state in every nation. If England, at this day, imports
+and exports more than at any former period, the nations with which she
+trades must necessarily do the same; her imports are their exports, and
+vice versa. There can be no such thing as a nation flourishing alone
+in commerce: she can only participate; and the destruction of it in any
+part must necessarily affect all. When, therefore, governments are
+at war, the attack is made upon a common stock of commerce, and the
+consequence is the same as if each had attacked his own. The present
+increase of commerce is not to be attributed to ministers, or to any
+political contrivances, but to its own natural operation in consequence
+of peace. The regular markets had been destroyed, the channels of trade
+broken up, the high road of the seas infested with robbers of every
+nation, and the attention of the world called to other objects. Those
+interruptions have ceased, and peace has restored the deranged condition
+of things to their proper order.*[25] It is worth remarking that every
+nation reckons the balance of trade in its own favour; and therefore
+something must be irregular in the common ideas upon this subject. The
+fact, however, is true, according to what is called a balance; and it
+is from this cause that commerce is universally supported. Every nation
+feels the advantage, or it would abandon the practice: but the deception
+lies in the mode of making up the accounts, and in attributing what are
+called profits to a wrong cause. Mr. Pitt has sometimes amused himself,
+by showing what he called a balance of trade from the custom-house
+books. This mode of calculating not only affords no rule that is true,
+but one that is false. In the first place, Every cargo that departs from
+the custom-house appears on the books as an export; and, according to
+the custom-house balance, the losses at sea, and by foreign failures,
+are all reckoned on the side of profit because they appear as exports.
+
+Secondly, Because the importation by the smuggling trade does not appear
+on the custom-house books, to arrange against the exports.
+
+No balance, therefore, as applying to superior advantages, can be
+drawn from these documents; and if we examine the natural operation of
+commerce, the idea is fallacious; and if true, would soon be injurious.
+The great support of commerce consists in the balance being a level of
+benefits among all nations.
+
+Two merchants of different nations trading together, will both become
+rich, and each makes the balance in his own favour; consequently, they
+do not get rich of each other; and it is the same with respect to the
+nations in which they reside. The case must be, that each nation must
+get rich out of its own means, and increases that riches by something
+which it procures from another in exchange.
+
+If a merchant in England sends an article of English manufacture abroad
+which costs him a shilling at home, and imports something which sells
+for two, he makes a balance of one shilling in his favour; but this is
+not gained out of the foreign nation or the foreign merchant, for he
+also does the same by the articles he receives, and neither has the
+advantage upon the other. The original value of the two articles in
+their proper countries was but two shillings; but by changing their
+places, they acquire a new idea of value, equal to double what they had
+first, and that increased value is equally divided.
+
+There is no otherwise a balance on foreign than on domestic commerce.
+The merchants of London and Newcastle trade on the same principles, as
+if they resided in different nations, and make their balances in the
+same manner: yet London does not get rich out of Newcastle, any more
+than Newcastle out of London: but coals, the merchandize of Newcastle,
+have an additional value at London, and London merchandize has the same
+at Newcastle.
+
+Though the principle of all commerce is the same, the domestic, in a
+national view, is the part the most beneficial; because the whole of the
+advantages, an both sides, rests within the nation; whereas, in foreign
+commerce, it is only a participation of one-half.
+
+The most unprofitable of all commerce is that connected with foreign
+dominion. To a few individuals it may be beneficial, merely because it
+is commerce; but to the nation it is a loss. The expense of maintaining
+dominion more than absorbs the profits of any trade. It does not
+increase the general quantity in the world, but operates to lessen it;
+and as a greater mass would be afloat by relinquishing dominion, the
+participation without the expense would be more valuable than a greater
+quantity with it.
+
+But it is impossible to engross commerce by dominion; and therefore
+it is still more fallacious. It cannot exist in confined channels, and
+necessarily breaks out by regular or irregular means, that defeat
+the attempt: and to succeed would be still worse. France, since the
+Revolution, has been more indifferent as to foreign possessions, and
+other nations will become the same when they investigate the subject
+with respect to commerce.
+
+To the expense of dominion is to be added that of navies, and when the
+amounts of the two are subtracted from the profits of commerce, it will
+appear, that what is called the balance of trade, even admitting it to
+exist, is not enjoyed by the nation, but absorbed by the Government.
+
+The idea of having navies for the protection of commerce is delusive.
+It is putting means of destruction for the means of protection. Commerce
+needs no other protection than the reciprocal interest which every
+nation feels in supporting it--it is common stock--it exists by a
+balance of advantages to all; and the only interruption it meets, is
+from the present uncivilised state of governments, and which it is its
+common interest to reform.*[26]
+
+Quitting this subject, I now proceed to other matters.--As it is
+necessary to include England in the prospect of a general reformation,
+it is proper to inquire into the defects of its government. It is only
+by each nation reforming its own, that the whole can be improved, and
+the full benefit of reformation enjoyed. Only partial advantages can
+flow from partial reforms.
+
+France and England are the only two countries in Europe where a
+reformation in government could have successfully begun. The one secure
+by the ocean, and the other by the immensity of its internal strength,
+could defy the malignancy of foreign despotism. But it is with
+revolutions as with commerce, the advantages increase by their becoming
+general, and double to either what each would receive alone.
+
+As a new system is now opening to the view of the world, the European
+courts are plotting to counteract it. Alliances, contrary to all former
+systems, are agitating, and a common interest of courts is forming
+against the common interest of man. This combination draws a line that
+runs throughout Europe, and presents a cause so entirely new as to
+exclude all calculations from former circumstances. While despotism
+warred with despotism, man had no interest in the contest; but in a
+cause that unites the soldier with the citizen, and nation with nation,
+the despotism of courts, though it feels the danger and meditates
+revenge, is afraid to strike.
+
+No question has arisen within the records of history that pressed with
+the importance of the present. It is not whether this or that party
+shall be in or not, or Whig or Tory, high or low shall prevail; but
+whether man shall inherit his rights, and universal civilisation take
+place? Whether the fruits of his labours shall be enjoyed by himself
+or consumed by the profligacy of governments? Whether robbery shall be
+banished from courts, and wretchedness from countries?
+
+When, in countries that are called civilised, we see age going to the
+workhouse and youth to the gallows, something must be wrong in the
+system of government. It would seem, by the exterior appearance of such
+countries, that all was happiness; but there lies hidden from the eye of
+common observation, a mass of wretchedness, that has scarcely any other
+chance, than to expire in poverty or infamy. Its entrance into life is
+marked with the presage of its fate; and until this is remedied, it is
+in vain to punish.
+
+Civil government does not exist in executions; but in making such
+provision for the instruction of youth and the support of age, as to
+exclude, as much as possible, profligacy from the one and despair from
+the other. Instead of this, the resources of a country are lavished upon
+kings, upon courts, upon hirelings, impostors and prostitutes; and even
+the poor themselves, with all their wants upon them, are compelled to
+support the fraud that oppresses them.
+
+Why is it that scarcely any are executed but the poor? The fact is a
+proof, among other things, of a wretchedness in their condition. Bred up
+without morals, and cast upon the world without a prospect, they are
+the exposed sacrifice of vice and legal barbarity. The millions that are
+superfluously wasted upon governments are more than sufficient to reform
+those evils, and to benefit the condition of every man in a nation, not
+included within the purlieus of a court. This I hope to make appear in
+the progress of this work.
+
+It is the nature of compassion to associate with misfortune. In taking
+up this subject I seek no recompense--I fear no consequence. Fortified
+with that proud integrity, that disdains to triumph or to yield, I will
+advocate the Rights of Man.
+
+It is to my advantage that I have served an apprenticeship to life. I
+know the value of moral instruction, and I have seen the danger of the
+contrary.
+
+At an early period--little more than sixteen years of age, raw and
+adventurous, and heated with the false heroism of a master*[27] who
+had served in a man-of-war--I began the carver of my own fortune,
+and entered on board the Terrible Privateer, Captain Death. From
+this adventure I was happily prevented by the affectionate and moral
+remonstrance of a good father, who, from his own habits of life, being
+of the Quaker profession, must begin to look upon me as lost. But the
+impression, much as it effected at the time, began to wear away, and I
+entered afterwards in the King of Prussia Privateer, Captain Mendez,
+and went with her to sea. Yet, from such a beginning, and with all the
+inconvenience of early life against me, I am proud to say, that with
+a perseverance undismayed by difficulties, a disinterestedness that
+compelled respect, I have not only contributed to raise a new empire in
+the world, founded on a new system of government, but I have arrived at
+an eminence in political literature, the most difficult of all lines to
+succeed and excel in, which aristocracy with all its aids has not been
+able to reach or to rival.*[28]
+
+Knowing my own heart and feeling myself as I now do, superior to all the
+skirmish of party, the inveteracy of interested or mistaken opponents,
+I answer not to falsehood or abuse, but proceed to the defects of the
+English Government.
+
+I begin with charters and corporations.
+
+It is a perversion of terms to say that a charter gives rights. It
+operates by a contrary effect--that of taking rights away. Rights are
+inherently in all the inhabitants; but charters, by annulling those
+rights, in the majority, leave the right, by exclusion, in the hands of
+a few. If charters were constructed so as to express in direct terms,
+"that every inhabitant, who is not a member of a corporation, shall
+not exercise the right of voting," such charters would, in the face, be
+charters not of rights, but of exclusion. The effect is the same under
+the form they now stand; and the only persons on whom they operate are
+the persons whom they exclude. Those whose rights are guaranteed, by
+not being taken away, exercise no other rights than as members of the
+community they are entitled to without a charter; and, therefore, all
+charters have no other than an indirect negative operation. They do not
+give rights to A, but they make a difference in favour of A by taking
+away the right of B, and consequently are instruments of injustice.
+
+But charters and corporations have a more extensive evil effect
+than what relates merely to elections. They are sources of endless
+contentions in the places where they exist, and they lessen the common
+rights of national society. A native of England, under the operation of
+these charters and corporations, cannot be said to be an Englishman in
+the full sense of the word. He is not free of the nation, in the same
+manner that a Frenchman is free of France, and an American of America.
+His rights are circumscribed to the town, and, in some cases, to the
+parish of his birth; and all other parts, though in his native land, are
+to him as a foreign country. To acquire a residence in these, he must
+undergo a local naturalisation by purchase, or he is forbidden or
+expelled the place. This species of feudality is kept up to aggrandise
+the corporations at the ruin of towns; and the effect is visible.
+
+The generality of corporation towns are in a state of solitary decay,
+and prevented from further ruin only by some circumstance in their
+situation, such as a navigable river, or a plentiful surrounding
+country. As population is one of the chief sources of wealth (for
+without it land itself has no value), everything which operates to
+prevent it must lessen the value of property; and as corporations have
+not only this tendency, but directly this effect, they cannot but be
+injurious. If any policy were to be followed, instead of that of general
+freedom, to every person to settle where he chose (as in France or
+America) it would be more consistent to give encouragement to new comers
+than to preclude their admission by exacting premiums from them.*[29]
+
+The persons most immediately interested in the abolition of corporations
+are the inhabitants of the towns where corporations are established. The
+instances of Manchester, Birmingham, and Sheffield show, by contrast,
+the injuries which those Gothic institutions are to property and
+commerce. A few examples may be found, such as that of London, whose
+natural and commercial advantage, owing to its situation on the Thames,
+is capable of bearing up against the political evils of a corporation;
+but in almost all other cases the fatality is too visible to be doubted
+or denied.
+
+Though the whole nation is not so directly affected by the depression of
+property in corporation towns as the inhabitants themselves, it partakes
+of the consequence. By lessening the value of property, the quantity of
+national commerce is curtailed. Every man is a customer in proportion
+to his ability; and as all parts of a nation trade with each other,
+whatever affects any of the parts must necessarily communicate to the
+whole.
+
+As one of the Houses of the English Parliament is, in a great measure,
+made up of elections from these corporations; and as it is unnatural
+that a pure stream should flow from a foul fountain, its vices are but a
+continuation of the vices of its origin. A man of moral honour and good
+political principles cannot submit to the mean drudgery and disgraceful
+arts, by which such elections are carried. To be a successful candidate,
+he must be destitute of the qualities that constitute a just legislator;
+and being thus disciplined to corruption by the mode of entering into
+Parliament, it is not to be expected that the representative should be
+better than the man.
+
+Mr. Burke, in speaking of the English representation, has advanced
+as bold a challenge as ever was given in the days of chivalry. "Our
+representation," says he, "has been found perfectly adequate to all
+the purposes for which a representation of the people can be desired or
+devised." "I defy," continues he, "the enemies of our constitution
+to show the contrary."--This declaration from a man who has been in
+constant opposition to all the measures of parliament the whole of his
+political life, a year or two excepted, is most extraordinary; and,
+comparing him with himself, admits of no other alternative, than that he
+acted against his judgment as a member, or has declared contrary to it
+as an author.
+
+But it is not in the representation only that the defects lie, and
+therefore I proceed in the next place to the aristocracy.
+
+What is called the House of Peers, is constituted on a ground very
+similar to that, against which there is no law in other cases. It
+amounts to a combination of persons in one common interest. No better
+reason can be given, why a house of legislation should be composed
+entirely of men whose occupation consists in letting landed property,
+than why it should be composed of those who hire, or of brewers, or
+bakers, or any other separate class of men. Mr. Burke calls this house
+"the great ground and pillar of security to the landed interest." Let us
+examine this idea.
+
+What pillar of security does the landed interest require more than any
+other interest in the state, or what right has it to a distinct and
+separate representation from the general interest of a nation? The only
+use to be made of this power (and which it always has made), is to ward
+off taxes from itself, and throw the burthen upon those articles of
+consumption by which itself would be least affected.
+
+That this has been the consequence (and will always be the consequence)
+of constructing governments on combinations, is evident with respect to
+England, from the history of its taxes.
+
+Notwithstanding taxes have increased and multiplied upon every article
+of common consumption, the land-tax, which more particularly affects
+this "pillar," has diminished. In 1778 the amount of the land-tax was
+L1,950,000, which is half-a-million less than it produced almost
+a hundred years ago,*[30] notwithstanding the rentals are in many
+instances doubled since that period.
+
+Before the coming of the Hanoverians, the taxes were divided in nearly
+equal proportions between the land and articles of consumption, the land
+bearing rather the largest share: but since that era nearly thirteen
+millions annually of new taxes have been thrown upon consumption. The
+consequence of which has been a constant increase in the number and
+wretchedness of the poor, and in the amount of the poor-rates. Yet here
+again the burthen does not fall in equal proportions on the aristocracy
+with the rest of the community. Their residences, whether in town or
+country, are not mixed with the habitations of the poor. They live apart
+from distress, and the expense of relieving it. It is in manufacturing
+towns and labouring villages that those burthens press the heaviest; in
+many of which it is one class of poor supporting another.
+
+Several of the most heavy and productive taxes are so contrived, as to
+give an exemption to this pillar, thus standing in its own defence. The
+tax upon beer brewed for sale does not affect the aristocracy, who brew
+their own beer free from this duty. It falls only on those who have
+not conveniency or ability to brew, and who must purchase it in small
+quantities. But what will mankind think of the justice of taxation,
+when they know that this tax alone, from which the aristocracy are from
+circumstances exempt, is nearly equal to the whole of the land-tax,
+being in the year 1788, and it is not less now, L1,666,152, and with its
+proportion of the taxes on malt and hops, it exceeds it.--That a single
+article, thus partially consumed, and that chiefly by the working part,
+should be subject to a tax, equal to that on the whole rental of a
+nation, is, perhaps, a fact not to be paralleled in the histories of
+revenues.
+
+This is one of the circumstances resulting from a house of legislation,
+composed on the ground of a combination of common interest; for whatever
+their separate politics as to parties may be, in this they are united.
+Whether a combination acts to raise the price of any article for sale,
+or rate of wages; or whether it acts to throw taxes from itself upon
+another class of the community, the principle and the effect are the
+same; and if the one be illegal, it will be difficult to show that the
+other ought to exist.
+
+It is no use to say that taxes are first proposed in the House of
+Commons; for as the other house has always a negative, it can
+always defend itself; and it would be ridiculous to suppose that its
+acquiescence in the measures to be proposed were not understood
+before hand. Besides which, it has obtained so much influence by
+borough-traffic, and so many of its relations and connections are
+distributed on both sides the commons, as to give it, besides an
+absolute negative in one house, a preponderancy in the other, in all
+matters of common concern.
+
+It is difficult to discover what is meant by the landed interest, if
+it does not mean a combination of aristocratical landholders, opposing
+their own pecuniary interest to that of the farmer, and every branch of
+trade, commerce, and manufacture. In all other respects it is the
+only interest that needs no partial protection. It enjoys the general
+protection of the world. Every individual, high or low, is interested
+in the fruits of the earth; men, women, and children, of all ages and
+degrees, will turn out to assist the farmer, rather than a harvest
+should not be got in; and they will not act thus by any other property.
+It is the only one for which the common prayer of mankind is put up,
+and the only one that can never fail from the want of means. It is the
+interest, not of the policy, but of the existence of man, and when it
+ceases, he must cease to be.
+
+No other interest in a nation stands on the same united support.
+Commerce, manufactures, arts, sciences, and everything else, compared
+with this, are supported but in parts. Their prosperity or their decay
+has not the same universal influence. When the valleys laugh and sing,
+it is not the farmer only, but all creation that rejoice. It is a
+prosperity that excludes all envy; and this cannot be said of anything
+else.
+
+Why then, does Mr. Burke talk of his house of peers as the pillar of
+the landed interest? Were that pillar to sink into the earth, the same
+landed property would continue, and the same ploughing, sowing, and
+reaping would go on. The aristocracy are not the farmers who work the
+land, and raise the produce, but are the mere consumers of the rent; and
+when compared with the active world are the drones, a seraglio of males,
+who neither collect the honey nor form the hive, but exist only for lazy
+enjoyment.
+
+Mr. Burke, in his first essay, called aristocracy "the Corinthian
+capital of polished society." Towards completing the figure, he has now
+added the pillar; but still the base is wanting; and whenever a nation
+choose to act a Samson, not blind, but bold, down will go the temple of
+Dagon, the Lords and the Philistines.
+
+If a house of legislation is to be composed of men of one class, for
+the purpose of protecting a distinct interest, all the other interests
+should have the same. The inequality, as well as the burthen of
+taxation, arises from admitting it in one case, and not in all. Had
+there been a house of farmers, there had been no game laws; or a house
+of merchants and manufacturers, the taxes had neither been so unequal
+nor so excessive. It is from the power of taxation being in the hands of
+those who can throw so great a part of it from their own shoulders, that
+it has raged without a check.
+
+Men of small or moderate estates are more injured by the taxes being
+thrown on articles of consumption, than they are eased by warding it
+from landed property, for the following reasons:
+
+First, They consume more of the productive taxable articles, in
+proportion to their property, than those of large estates.
+
+Secondly, Their residence is chiefly in towns, and their property in
+houses; and the increase of the poor-rates, occasioned by taxes on
+consumption, is in much greater proportion than the land-tax has
+been favoured. In Birmingham, the poor-rates are not less than
+seven shillings in the pound. From this, as is already observed, the
+aristocracy are in a great measure exempt.
+
+These are but a part of the mischiefs flowing from the wretched scheme
+of an house of peers.
+
+As a combination, it can always throw a considerable portion of taxes
+from itself; and as an hereditary house, accountable to nobody, it
+resembles a rotten borough, whose consent is to be courted by interest.
+There are but few of its members, who are not in some mode or
+other participators, or disposers of the public money. One turns a
+candle-holder, or a lord in waiting; another a lord of the bed-chamber,
+a groom of the stole, or any insignificant nominal office to which a
+salary is annexed, paid out of the public taxes, and which avoids the
+direct appearance of corruption. Such situations are derogatory to the
+character of man; and where they can be submitted to, honour cannot
+reside.
+
+To all these are to be added the numerous dependants, the long list of
+younger branches and distant relations, who are to be provided for
+at the public expense: in short, were an estimation to be made of the
+charge of aristocracy to a nation, it will be found nearly equal to that
+of supporting the poor. The Duke of Richmond alone (and there are cases
+similar to his) takes away as much for himself as would maintain two
+thousand poor and aged persons. Is it, then, any wonder, that under such
+a system of government, taxes and rates have multiplied to their present
+extent?
+
+In stating these matters, I speak an open and disinterested language,
+dictated by no passion but that of humanity. To me, who have not only
+refused offers, because I thought them improper, but have declined
+rewards I might with reputation have accepted, it is no wonder that
+meanness and imposition appear disgustful. Independence is my happiness,
+and I view things as they are, without regard to place or person; my
+country is the world, and my religion is to do good.
+
+Mr. Burke, in speaking of the aristocratical law of primogeniture, says,
+"it is the standing law of our landed inheritance; and which, without
+question, has a tendency, and I think," continues he, "a happy tendency,
+to preserve a character of weight and consequence."
+
+Mr. Burke may call this law what he pleases, but humanity and impartial
+reflection will denounce it as a law of brutal injustice. Were we not
+accustomed to the daily practice, and did we only hear of it as the
+law of some distant part of the world, we should conclude that
+the legislators of such countries had not arrived at a state of
+civilisation.
+
+As to its preserving a character of weight and consequence, the case
+appears to me directly the reverse. It is an attaint upon character;
+a sort of privateering on family property. It may have weight among
+dependent tenants, but it gives none on a scale of national, and much
+less of universal character. Speaking for myself, my parents were not
+able to give me a shilling, beyond what they gave me in education; and
+to do this they distressed themselves: yet, I possess more of what is
+called consequence, in the world, than any one in Mr. Burke's catalogue
+of aristocrats.
+
+Having thus glanced at some of the defects of the two houses of
+parliament, I proceed to what is called the crown, upon which I shall be
+very concise.
+
+It signifies a nominal office of a million sterling a year, the business
+of which consists in receiving the money. Whether the person be wise
+or foolish, sane or insane, a native or a foreigner, matters not. Every
+ministry acts upon the same idea that Mr. Burke writes, namely, that the
+people must be hood-winked, and held in superstitious ignorance by some
+bugbear or other; and what is called the crown answers this purpose, and
+therefore it answers all the purposes to be expected from it. This is
+more than can be said of the other two branches.
+
+The hazard to which this office is exposed in all countries, is not from
+anything that can happen to the man, but from what may happen to the
+nation--the danger of its coming to its senses.
+
+It has been customary to call the crown the executive power, and the
+custom is continued, though the reason has ceased.
+
+It was called the executive, because the person whom it signified
+used, formerly, to act in the character of a judge, in administering
+or executing the laws. The tribunals were then a part of the court. The
+power, therefore, which is now called the judicial, is what was called
+the executive and, consequently, one or other of the terms is redundant,
+and one of the offices useless. When we speak of the crown now, it means
+nothing; it signifies neither a judge nor a general: besides which it
+is the laws that govern, and not the man. The old terms are kept up, to
+give an appearance of consequence to empty forms; and the only effect
+they have is that of increasing expenses.
+
+Before I proceed to the means of rendering governments more conducive to
+the general happiness of mankind, than they are at present, it will not
+be improper to take a review of the progress of taxation in England.
+
+It is a general idea, that when taxes are once laid on, they are never
+taken off. However true this may have been of late, it was not always
+so. Either, therefore, the people of former times were more watchful
+over government than those of the present, or government was
+administered with less extravagance.
+
+It is now seven hundred years since the Norman conquest, and the
+establishment of what is called the crown. Taking this portion of time
+in seven separate periods of one hundred years each, the amount of the
+annual taxes, at each period, will be as follows:
+
+ Annual taxes levied by William the Conqueror,
+ beginning in the year 1066 L400,000
+ Annual taxes at 100 years from the conquest (1166) 200,000
+ Annual taxes at 200 years from the conquest (1266) 150,000
+ Annual taxes at 300 years from the conquest (1366) 130,000
+ Annual taxes at 400 years from the conquest (1466) 100,000
+
+These statements and those which follow, are taken from Sir John
+Sinclair's History of the Revenue; by which it appears, that taxes
+continued decreasing for four hundred years, at the expiration of which
+time they were reduced three-fourths, viz., from four hundred thousand
+pounds to one hundred thousand. The people of England of the present
+day, have a traditionary and historical idea of the bravery of their
+ancestors; but whatever their virtues or their vices might have been,
+they certainly were a people who would not be imposed upon, and who kept
+governments in awe as to taxation, if not as to principle. Though they
+were not able to expel the monarchical usurpation, they restricted it to
+a republican economy of taxes.
+
+Let us now review the remaining three hundred years:
+
+Annual amount of taxes at:
+
+ 500 years from the conquest (1566) 500,000
+ 600 years from the conquest (1666) 1,800,000
+ the present time (1791) 17,000,000
+
+The difference between the first four hundred years and the last three,
+is so astonishing, as to warrant an opinion, that the national character
+of the English has changed. It would have been impossible to have
+dragooned the former English, into the excess of taxation that now
+exists; and when it is considered that the pay of the army, the navy,
+and of all the revenue officers, is the same now as it was about a
+hundred years ago, when the taxes were not above a tenth part of what
+they are at present, it appears impossible to account for the enormous
+increase and expenditure on any other ground, than extravagance,
+corruption, and intrigue.*[31]
+
+With the Revolution of 1688, and more so since the Hanover succession,
+came the destructive system of continental intrigues, and the rage for
+foreign wars and foreign dominion; systems of such secure mystery that
+the expenses admit of no accounts; a single line stands for millions. To
+what excess taxation might have extended had not the French revolution
+contributed to break up the system, and put an end to pretences, is
+impossible to say. Viewed, as that revolution ought to be, as the
+fortunate means of lessening the load of taxes of both countries, it is
+of as much importance to England as to France; and, if properly improved
+to all the advantages of which it is capable, and to which it leads,
+deserves as much celebration in one country as the other.
+
+In pursuing this subject, I shall begin with the matter that first
+presents itself, that of lessening the burthen of taxes; and shall then
+add such matter and propositions, respecting the three countries of
+England, France, and America, as the present prospect of things appears
+to justify: I mean, an alliance of the three, for the purposes that will
+be mentioned in their proper place.
+
+What has happened may happen again. By the statement before shown of
+the progress of taxation, it is seen that taxes have been lessened to
+a fourth part of what they had formerly been. Though the present
+circumstances do not admit of the same reduction, yet they admit of such
+a beginning, as may accomplish that end in less time than in the former
+case.
+
+The amount of taxes for the year ending at Michaelmas 1788, was as
+follows:
+
+ Land-tax L 1,950,000
+ Customs 3,789,274
+ Excise (including old and new malt) 6,751,727
+ Stamps 1,278,214
+ Miscellaneous taxes and incidents 1,803,755
+ -----------
+ L15,572,755
+
+Since the year 1788, upwards of one million new taxes have been laid on,
+besides the produce of the lotteries; and as the taxes have in general
+been more productive since than before, the amount may be taken, in
+round numbers, at L17,000,000. (The expense of collection and the
+drawbacks, which together amount to nearly two millions, are paid out of
+the gross amount; and the above is the net sum paid into the exchequer).
+This sum of seventeen millions is applied to two different purposes; the
+one to pay the interest of the National Debt, the other to the current
+expenses of each year. About nine millions are appropriated to the
+former; and the remainder, being nearly eight millions, to the latter.
+As to the million, said to be applied to the reduction of the debt, it
+is so much like paying with one hand and taking out with the other, as
+not to merit much notice. It happened, fortunately for France, that
+she possessed national domains for paying off her debt, and thereby
+lessening her taxes; but as this is not the case with England, her
+reduction of taxes can only take place by reducing the current expenses,
+which may now be done to the amount of four or five millions annually,
+as will hereafter appear. When this is accomplished it will more than
+counter-balance the enormous charge of the American war; and the saving
+will be from the same source from whence the evil arose. As to the
+national debt, however heavy the interest may be in taxes, yet, as it
+serves to keep alive a capital useful to commerce, it balances by its
+effects a considerable part of its own weight; and as the quantity
+of gold and silver is, by some means or other, short of its proper
+proportion, being not more than twenty millions, whereas it should be
+sixty (foreign intrigue, foreign wars, foreign dominions, will in
+a great measure account for the deficiency), it would, besides the
+injustice, be bad policy to extinguish a capital that serves to supply
+that defect. But with respect to the current expense, whatever is saved
+therefrom is gain. The excess may serve to keep corruption alive, but it
+has no re-action on credit and commerce, like the interest of the debt.
+
+It is now very probable that the English Government (I do not mean
+the nation) is unfriendly to the French Revolution. Whatever serves to
+expose the intrigue and lessen the influence of courts, by lessening
+taxation, will be unwelcome to those who feed upon the spoil. Whilst the
+clamour of French intrigue, arbitrary power, popery, and wooden shoes
+could be kept up, the nation was easily allured and alarmed into taxes.
+Those days are now past: deception, it is to be hoped, has reaped its
+last harvest, and better times are in prospect for both countries, and
+for the world.
+
+Taking it for granted that an alliance may be formed between England,
+France, and America for the purposes hereafter to be mentioned, the
+national expenses of France and England may consequently be lessened.
+The same fleets and armies will no longer be necessary to either, and
+the reduction can be made ship for ship on each side. But to accomplish
+these objects the governments must necessarily be fitted to a common
+and correspondent principle. Confidence can never take place while an
+hostile disposition remains in either, or where mystery and secrecy on
+one side is opposed to candour and openness on the other.
+
+These matters admitted, the national expenses might be put back, for the
+sake of a precedent, to what they were at some period when France and
+England were not enemies. This, consequently, must be prior to the
+Hanover succession, and also to the Revolution of 1688.*[32] The first
+instance that presents itself, antecedent to those dates, is in the
+very wasteful and profligate times of Charles the Second; at which time
+England and France acted as allies. If I have chosen a period of great
+extravagance, it will serve to show modern extravagance in a still worse
+light; especially as the pay of the navy, the army, and the revenue
+officers has not increased since that time.
+
+The peace establishment was then as follows (see Sir John Sinclair's
+History of the Revenue):
+
+ Navy L 300,000
+ Army 212,000
+ Ordnance 40,000
+ Civil List 462,115
+ -------
+ L1,014,115
+
+The parliament, however, settled the whole annual peace establishment
+at $1,200,000.*[33] If we go back to the time of Elizabeth the amount of
+all the taxes was but half a million, yet the nation sees nothing during
+that period that reproaches it with want of consequence.
+
+All circumstances, then, taken together, arising from the French
+revolution, from the approaching harmony and reciprocal interest of the
+two nations, the abolition of the court intrigue on both sides, and
+the progress of knowledge in the science of government, the annual
+expenditure might be put back to one million and a half, viz.:
+
+ Navy L 500,000
+ Army 500,000
+ Expenses of Government 500,000
+ ----------
+ L1,500,000
+
+Even this sum is six times greater than the expenses of government are
+in America, yet the civil internal government in England (I mean that
+administered by means of quarter sessions, juries and assize, and which,
+in fact, is nearly the whole, and performed by the nation), is
+less expense upon the revenue, than the same species and portion of
+government is in America.
+
+It is time that nations should be rational, and not be governed like
+animals, for the pleasure of their riders. To read the history of kings,
+a man would be almost inclined to suppose that government consisted in
+stag-hunting, and that every nation paid a million a-year to a huntsman.
+Man ought to have pride, or shame enough to blush at being thus imposed
+upon, and when he feels his proper character he will. Upon all subjects
+of this nature, there is often passing in the mind, a train of ideas he
+has not yet accustomed himself to encourage and communicate. Restrained
+by something that puts on the character of prudence, he acts the
+hypocrite upon himself as well as to others. It is, however, curious
+to observe how soon this spell can be dissolved. A single expression,
+boldly conceived and uttered, will sometimes put a whole company into
+their proper feelings: and whole nations are acted on in the same
+manner.
+
+As to the offices of which any civil government may be composed, it
+matters but little by what names they are described. In the routine of
+business, as before observed, whether a man be styled a president, a
+king, an emperor, a senator, or anything else, it is impossible that any
+service he can perform, can merit from a nation more than ten thousand
+pounds a year; and as no man should be paid beyond his services, so
+every man of a proper heart will not accept more. Public money ought to
+be touched with the most scrupulous consciousness of honour. It is
+not the produce of riches only, but of the hard earnings of labour and
+poverty. It is drawn even from the bitterness of want and misery. Not
+a beggar passes, or perishes in the streets, whose mite is not in that
+mass.
+
+Were it possible that the Congress of America could be so lost to their
+duty, and to the interest of their constituents, as to offer General
+Washington, as president of America, a million a year, he would not, and
+he could not, accept it. His sense of honour is of another kind. It
+has cost England almost seventy millions sterling, to maintain a family
+imported from abroad, of very inferior capacity to thousands in the
+nation; and scarcely a year has passed that has not produced some new
+mercenary application. Even the physicians' bills have been sent to
+the public to be paid. No wonder that jails are crowded, and taxes and
+poor-rates increased. Under such systems, nothing is to be looked for
+but what has already happened; and as to reformation, whenever it come,
+it must be from the nation, and not from the government.
+
+To show that the sum of five hundred thousand pounds is more than
+sufficient to defray all the expenses of the government, exclusive of
+navies and armies, the following estimate is added, for any country, of
+the same extent as England.
+
+In the first place, three hundred representatives fairly elected, are
+sufficient for all the purposes to which legislation can apply, and
+preferable to a larger number. They may be divided into two or three
+houses, or meet in one, as in France, or in any manner a constitution
+shall direct.
+
+As representation is always considered, in free countries, as the most
+honourable of all stations, the allowance made to it is merely to defray
+the expense which the representatives incur by that service, and not to
+it as an office.
+
+ If an allowance, at the rate of five hundred pounds per
+ annum, be made to every representative, deducting for
+ non-attendance, the expense, if the whole number
+ attended for six months, each year, would be L 75,00
+
+ The official departments cannot reasonably exceed the
+ following number, with the salaries annexed:
+
+ Three offices at ten thousand pounds each L 30,000
+ Ten ditto, at five thousand pounds each 50,000
+ Twenty ditto, at two thousand pounds each 40,000
+ Forty ditto, at one thousand pounds each 40,000
+ Two hundred ditto, at five hundred pounds each 100,000
+ Three hundred ditto, at two hundred pounds each 60,000
+ Five hundred ditto, at one hundred pounds each 50,000
+ Seven hundred ditto, at seventy-five pounds each 52,500
+ --------
+ L497,500
+
+If a nation choose, it can deduct four per cent. from all offices, and
+make one of twenty thousand per annum.
+
+All revenue officers are paid out of the monies they collect, and
+therefore, are not in this estimation.
+
+The foregoing is not offered as an exact detail of offices, but to show
+the number of rate of salaries which five hundred thousand pounds will
+support; and it will, on experience, be found impracticable to find
+business sufficient to justify even this expense. As to the manner in
+which office business is now performed, the Chiefs, in several offices,
+such as the post-office, and certain offices in the exchequer, etc., do
+little more than sign their names three or four times a year; and the
+whole duty is performed by under-clerks.
+
+Taking, therefore, one million and a half as a sufficient peace
+establishment for all the honest purposes of government, which is
+three hundred thousand pounds more than the peace establishment in the
+profligate and prodigal times of Charles the Second (notwithstanding, as
+has been already observed, the pay and salaries of the army, navy,
+and revenue officers, continue the same as at that period), there will
+remain a surplus of upwards of six millions out of the present current
+expenses. The question then will be, how to dispose of this surplus.
+
+Whoever has observed the manner in which trade and taxes twist
+themselves together, must be sensible of the impossibility of separating
+them suddenly.
+
+First. Because the articles now on hand are already charged with the
+duty, and the reduction cannot take place on the present stock.
+
+Secondly. Because, on all those articles on which the duty is charged
+in the gross, such as per barrel, hogshead, hundred weight, or ton, the
+abolition of the duty does not admit of being divided down so as fully
+to relieve the consumer, who purchases by the pint, or the pound. The
+last duty laid on strong beer and ale was three shillings per barrel,
+which, if taken off, would lessen the purchase only half a farthing per
+pint, and consequently, would not reach to practical relief.
+
+This being the condition of a great part of the taxes, it will be
+necessary to look for such others as are free from this embarrassment
+and where the relief will be direct and visible, and capable of
+immediate operation.
+
+In the first place, then, the poor-rates are a direct tax which every
+house-keeper feels, and who knows also, to a farthing, the sum which
+he pays. The national amount of the whole of the poor-rates is not
+positively known, but can be procured. Sir John Sinclair, in his History
+of the Revenue has stated it at L2,100,587. A considerable part of
+which is expended in litigations, in which the poor, instead of being
+relieved, are tormented. The expense, however, is the same to the parish
+from whatever cause it arises.
+
+In Birmingham, the amount of poor-rates is fourteen thousand pounds
+a year. This, though a large sum, is moderate, compared with the
+population. Birmingham is said to contain seventy thousand souls, and on
+a proportion of seventy thousand to fourteen thousand pounds poor-rates,
+the national amount of poor-rates, taking the population of England as
+seven millions, would be but one million four hundred thousand pounds.
+It is, therefore, most probable, that the population of Birmingham
+is over-rated. Fourteen thousand pounds is the proportion upon fifty
+thousand souls, taking two millions of poor-rates, as the national
+amount.
+
+Be it, however, what it may, it is no other than the consequence of
+excessive burthen of taxes, for, at the time when the taxes were very
+low, the poor were able to maintain themselves; and there were no
+poor-rates.*[34] In the present state of things a labouring man, with a
+wife or two or three children, does not pay less than between seven and
+eight pounds a year in taxes. He is not sensible of this, because it is
+disguised to him in the articles which he buys, and he thinks only of
+their dearness; but as the taxes take from him, at least, a fourth part
+of his yearly earnings, he is consequently disabled from providing for
+a family, especially, if himself, or any of them, are afflicted with
+sickness.
+
+The first step, therefore, of practical relief, would be to abolish the
+poor-rates entirely, and in lieu thereof, to make a remission of taxes
+to the poor of double the amount of the present poor-rates, viz., four
+millions annually out of the surplus taxes. By this measure, the poor
+would be benefited two millions, and the house-keepers two millions.
+This alone would be equal to a reduction of one hundred and twenty
+millions of the National Debt, and consequently equal to the whole
+expense of the American War.
+
+It will then remain to be considered, which is the most effectual mode
+of distributing this remission of four millions.
+
+It is easily seen, that the poor are generally composed of large
+families of children, and old people past their labour. If these two
+classes are provided for, the remedy will so far reach to the full
+extent of the case, that what remains will be incidental, and, in a
+great measure, fall within the compass of benefit clubs, which, though
+of humble invention, merit to be ranked among the best of modern
+institutions.
+
+Admitting England to contain seven millions of souls; if one-fifth
+thereof are of that class of poor which need support, the number will be
+one million four hundred thousand. Of this number, one hundred and forty
+thousand will be aged poor, as will be hereafter shown, and for which a
+distinct provision will be proposed.
+
+There will then remain one million two hundred and sixty thousand
+which, at five souls to each family, amount to two hundred and fifty-two
+thousand families, rendered poor from the expense of children and the
+weight of taxes.
+
+The number of children under fourteen years of age, in each of those
+families, will be found to be about five to every two families; some
+having two, and others three; some one, and others four: some none,
+and others five; but it rarely happens that more than five are under
+fourteen years of age, and after this age they are capable of service or
+of being apprenticed.
+
+Allowing five children (under fourteen years) to every two families,
+
+The number of children will be 630,000
+
+The number of parents, were they all living, would be 504,000
+
+It is certain, that if the children are provided for, the parents are
+relieved of consequence, because it is from the expense of bringing up
+children that their poverty arises.
+
+Having thus ascertained the greatest number that can be supposed to need
+support on account of young families, I proceed to the mode of relief or
+distribution, which is,
+
+To pay as a remission of taxes to every poor family, out of the surplus
+taxes, and in room of poor-rates, four pounds a year for every child
+under fourteen years of age; enjoining the parents of such children to
+send them to school, to learn reading, writing, and common arithmetic;
+the ministers of every parish, of every denomination to certify jointly
+to an office, for that purpose, that this duty is performed. The amount
+of this expense will be,
+
+ For six hundred and thirty thousand children
+ at four pounds per annum each L2,520,000
+
+By adopting this method, not only the poverty of the parents will be
+relieved, but ignorance will be banished from the rising generation, and
+the number of poor will hereafter become less, because their abilities,
+by the aid of education, will be greater. Many a youth, with good
+natural genius, who is apprenticed to a mechanical trade, such as
+a carpenter, joiner, millwright, shipwright, blacksmith, etc., is
+prevented getting forward the whole of his life from the want of a
+little common education when a boy.
+
+I now proceed to the case of the aged.
+
+I divide age into two classes. First, the approach of age, beginning at
+fifty. Secondly, old age commencing at sixty.
+
+At fifty, though the mental faculties of man are in full vigour, and
+his judgment better than at any preceding date, the bodily powers for
+laborious life are on the decline. He cannot bear the same quantity of
+fatigue as at an earlier period. He begins to earn less, and is
+less capable of enduring wind and weather; and in those more retired
+employments where much sight is required, he fails apace, and sees
+himself, like an old horse, beginning to be turned adrift.
+
+At sixty his labour ought to be over, at least from direct necessity.
+It is painful to see old age working itself to death, in what are called
+civilised countries, for daily bread.
+
+To form some judgment of the number of those above fifty years of age,
+I have several times counted the persons I met in the streets of London,
+men, women, and children, and have generally found that the average is
+about one in sixteen or seventeen. If it be said that aged persons
+do not come much into the streets, so neither do infants; and a great
+proportion of grown children are in schools and in work-shops as
+apprentices. Taking, then, sixteen for a divisor, the whole number of
+persons in England of fifty years and upwards, of both sexes, rich and
+poor, will be four hundred and twenty thousand.
+
+The persons to be provided for out of this gross number will be
+husbandmen, common labourers, journeymen of every trade and their wives,
+sailors, and disbanded soldiers, worn out servants of both sexes, and
+poor widows.
+
+There will be also a considerable number of middling tradesmen,
+who having lived decently in the former part of life, begin, as age
+approaches, to lose their business, and at last fall to decay.
+
+Besides these there will be constantly thrown off from the revolutions
+of that wheel which no man can stop nor regulate, a number from every
+class of life connected with commerce and adventure.
+
+To provide for all those accidents, and whatever else may befall, I take
+the number of persons who, at one time or other of their lives, after
+fifty years of age, may feel it necessary or comfortable to be better
+supported, than they can support themselves, and that not as a matter of
+grace and favour, but of right, at one-third of the whole number, which
+is one hundred and forty thousand, as stated in a previous page, and
+for whom a distinct provision was proposed to be made. If there be more,
+society, notwithstanding the show and pomposity of government, is in a
+deplorable condition in England.
+
+Of this one hundred and forty thousand, I take one half, seventy
+thousand, to be of the age of fifty and under sixty, and the other half
+to be sixty years and upwards. Having thus ascertained the probable
+proportion of the number of aged persons, I proceed to the mode of
+rendering their condition comfortable, which is:
+
+To pay to every such person of the age of fifty years, and until he
+shall arrive at the age of sixty, the sum of six pounds per annum out of
+the surplus taxes, and ten pounds per annum during life after the age of
+sixty. The expense of which will be,
+
+ Seventy thousand persons, at L6 per annum L 420,000
+ Seventy thousand persons, at L10 per annum 700,000
+ -------
+ L1,120,000
+
+This support, as already remarked, is not of the nature of a charity but
+of a right. Every person in England, male and female, pays on an average
+in taxes two pounds eight shillings and sixpence per annum from the day
+of his (or her) birth; and, if the expense of collection be added, he
+pays two pounds eleven shillings and sixpence; consequently, at the end
+of fifty years he has paid one hundred and twenty-eight pounds fifteen
+shillings; and at sixty one hundred and fifty-four pounds ten shillings.
+Converting, therefore, his (or her) individual tax in a tontine, the
+money he shall receive after fifty years is but little more than the
+legal interest of the net money he has paid; the rest is made up from
+those whose circumstances do not require them to draw such support, and
+the capital in both cases defrays the expenses of government. It is on
+this ground that I have extended the probable claims to one-third of
+the number of aged persons in the nation.--Is it, then, better that
+the lives of one hundred and forty thousand aged persons be rendered
+comfortable, or that a million a year of public money be expended on
+any one individual, and him often of the most worthless or insignificant
+character? Let reason and justice, let honour and humanity, let even
+hypocrisy, sycophancy and Mr. Burke, let George, let Louis,
+Leopold, Frederic, Catherine, Cornwallis, or Tippoo Saib, answer the
+question.*[35]
+
+The sum thus remitted to the poor will be,
+
+ To two hundred and fifty-two thousand poor families,
+ containing six hundred and thirty thousand children L2,520,000
+ To one hundred and forty thousand aged persons 1,120,000
+ ----------
+ L3,640,000
+
+There will then remain three hundred and sixty thousand pounds out of
+the four millions, part of which may be applied as follows:--
+
+After all the above cases are provided for there will still be a number
+of families who, though not properly of the class of poor, yet find it
+difficult to give education to their children; and such children, under
+such a case, would be in a worse condition than if their parents were
+actually poor. A nation under a well-regulated government should permit
+none to remain uninstructed. It is monarchical and aristocratical
+government only that requires ignorance for its support.
+
+Suppose, then, four hundred thousand children to be in this condition,
+which is a greater number than ought to be supposed after the provisions
+already made, the method will be:
+
+To allow for each of those children ten shillings a year for the
+expense of schooling for six years each, which will give them six months
+schooling each year, and half a crown a year for paper and spelling
+books.
+
+The expense of this will be annually L250,000.*[36]
+
+There will then remain one hundred and ten thousand pounds.
+
+Notwithstanding the great modes of relief which the best instituted and
+best principled government may devise, there will be a number of smaller
+cases, which it is good policy as well as beneficence in a nation to
+consider.
+
+Were twenty shillings to be given immediately on the birth of a child,
+to every woman who should make the demand, and none will make it whose
+circumstances do not require it, it might relieve a great deal of
+instant distress.
+
+There are about two hundred thousand births yearly in England; and if
+claimed by one fourth,
+
+ The amount would be L50,000
+
+And twenty shillings to every new-married couple who should claim in
+like manner. This would not exceed the sum of L20,000.
+
+Also twenty thousand pounds to be appropriated to defray the funeral
+expenses of persons, who, travelling for work, may die at a distance
+from their friends. By relieving parishes from this charge, the sick
+stranger will be better treated.
+
+I shall finish this part of the subject with a plan adapted to the
+particular condition of a metropolis, such as London.
+
+Cases are continually occurring in a metropolis, different from those
+which occur in the country, and for which a different, or rather an
+additional, mode of relief is necessary. In the country, even in large
+towns, people have a knowledge of each other, and distress never rises
+to that extreme height it sometimes does in a metropolis. There is no
+such thing in the country as persons, in the literal sense of the word,
+starved to death, or dying with cold from the want of a lodging. Yet
+such cases, and others equally as miserable, happen in London.
+
+Many a youth comes up to London full of expectations, and with little
+or no money, and unless he get immediate employment he is already half
+undone; and boys bred up in London without any means of a livelihood,
+and as it often happens of dissolute parents, are in a still worse
+condition; and servants long out of place are not much better off. In
+short, a world of little cases is continually arising, which busy or
+affluent life knows not of, to open the first door to distress. Hunger
+is not among the postponable wants, and a day, even a few hours, in such
+a condition is often the crisis of a life of ruin.
+
+These circumstances which are the general cause of the little thefts
+and pilferings that lead to greater, may be prevented. There yet remain
+twenty thousand pounds out of the four millions of surplus taxes, which
+with another fund hereafter to be mentioned, amounting to about twenty
+thousand pounds more, cannot be better applied than to this purpose. The
+plan will then be:
+
+First, To erect two or more buildings, or take some already erected,
+capable of containing at least six thousand persons, and to have in each
+of these places as many kinds of employment as can be contrived, so that
+every person who shall come may find something which he or she can do.
+
+Secondly, To receive all who shall come, without enquiring who or what
+they are. The only condition to be, that for so much, or so many hours'
+work, each person shall receive so many meals of wholesome food, and a
+warm lodging, at least as good as a barrack. That a certain portion of
+what each person's work shall be worth shall be reserved, and given to
+him or her, on their going away; and that each person shall stay as long
+or as short a time, or come as often as he choose, on these conditions.
+
+If each person stayed three months, it would assist by rotation
+twenty-four thousand persons annually, though the real number, at all
+times, would be but six thousand. By establishing an asylum of this
+kind, such persons to whom temporary distresses occur, would have an
+opportunity to recruit themselves, and be enabled to look out for better
+employment.
+
+Allowing that their labour paid but one half the expense of supporting
+them, after reserving a portion of their earnings for themselves, the
+sum of forty thousand pounds additional would defray all other charges
+for even a greater number than six thousand.
+
+The fund very properly convertible to this purpose, in addition to
+the twenty thousand pounds, remaining of the former fund, will be the
+produce of the tax upon coals, so iniquitously and wantonly applied to
+the support of the Duke of Richmond. It is horrid that any man, more
+especially at the price coals now are, should live on the distresses of
+a community; and any government permitting such an abuse, deserves to
+be dismissed. This fund is said to be about twenty thousand pounds per
+annum.
+
+I shall now conclude this plan with enumerating the several particulars,
+and then proceed to other matters.
+
+The enumeration is as follows:--
+
+First, Abolition of two millions poor-rates.
+
+Secondly, Provision for two hundred and fifty thousand poor families.
+
+Thirdly, Education for one million and thirty thousand children.
+
+Fourthly, Comfortable provision for one hundred and forty thousand aged
+persons.
+
+Fifthly, Donation of twenty shillings each for fifty thousand births.
+
+Sixthly, Donation of twenty shillings each for twenty thousand
+marriages.
+
+Seventhly, Allowance of twenty thousand pounds for the funeral expenses
+of persons travelling for work, and dying at a distance from their
+friends.
+
+Eighthly, Employment, at all times, for the casual poor in the cities of
+London and Westminster.
+
+By the operation of this plan, the poor laws, those instruments of civil
+torture, will be superseded, and the wasteful expense of litigation
+prevented. The hearts of the humane will not be shocked by ragged and
+hungry children, and persons of seventy and eighty years of age, begging
+for bread. The dying poor will not be dragged from place to place to
+breathe their last, as a reprisal of parish upon parish. Widows will
+have a maintenance for their children, and not be carted away, on the
+death of their husbands, like culprits and criminals; and children will
+no longer be considered as increasing the distresses of their parents.
+The haunts of the wretched will be known, because it will be to their
+advantage; and the number of petty crimes, the offspring of distress and
+poverty, will be lessened. The poor, as well as the rich, will then be
+interested in the support of government, and the cause and apprehension
+of riots and tumults will cease.--Ye who sit in ease, and solace
+yourselves in plenty, and such there are in Turkey and Russia, as well
+as in England, and who say to yourselves, "Are we not well off?" have ye
+thought of these things? When ye do, ye will cease to speak and feel for
+yourselves alone.
+
+The plan is easy in practice. It does not embarrass trade by a sudden
+interruption in the order of taxes, but effects the relief by changing
+the application of them; and the money necessary for the purpose can be
+drawn from the excise collections, which are made eight times a year in
+every market town in England.
+
+Having now arranged and concluded this subject, I proceed to the next.
+
+Taking the present current expenses at seven millions and an half, which
+is the least amount they are now at, there will remain (after the sum of
+one million and an half be taken for the new current expenses and four
+millions for the before-mentioned service) the sum of two millions; part
+of which to be applied as follows:
+
+Though fleets and armies, by an alliance with France, will, in a great
+measure, become useless, yet the persons who have devoted themselves to
+those services, and have thereby unfitted themselves for other lines of
+life, are not to be sufferers by the means that make others happy. They
+are a different description of men from those who form or hang about a
+court.
+
+A part of the army will remain, at least for some years, and also of the
+navy, for which a provision is already made in the former part of this
+plan of one million, which is almost half a million more than the peace
+establishment of the army and navy in the prodigal times of Charles the
+Second.
+
+Suppose, then, fifteen thousand soldiers to be disbanded, and that an
+allowance be made to each of three shillings a week during life, clear
+of all deductions, to be paid in the same manner as the Chelsea College
+pensioners are paid, and for them to return to their trades and their
+friends; and also that an addition of fifteen thousand sixpences per
+week be made to the pay of the soldiers who shall remain; the annual
+expenses will be:
+
+ To the pay of fifteen thousand disbanded soldiers
+ at three shillings per week L117,000
+ Additional pay to the remaining soldiers 19,500
+ Suppose that the pay to the officers of the
+ disbanded corps be the same amount as sum allowed
+ to the men 117,000
+ -------- L253,500
+
+ To prevent bulky estimations, admit the same sum
+ to the disbanded navy as to the army,
+ and the same increase of pay 253,500
+ --------
+ Total L507,000
+
+Every year some part of this sum of half a million (I omit the odd seven
+thousand pounds for the purpose of keeping the account unembarrassed)
+will fall in, and the whole of it in time, as it is on the ground of
+life annuities, except the increased pay of twenty-nine thousand
+pounds. As it falls in, part of the taxes may be taken off; and as, for
+instance, when thirty thousand pounds fall in, the duty on hops may be
+wholly taken off; and as other parts fall in, the duties on candles and
+soap may be lessened, till at last they will totally cease. There now
+remains at least one million and a half of surplus taxes.
+
+The tax on houses and windows is one of those direct taxes, which, like
+the poor-rates, is not confounded with trade; and, when taken off, the
+relief will be instantly felt. This tax falls heavy on the middle class
+of people. The amount of this tax, by the returns of 1788, was:
+
+ Houses and windows: L s. d.
+ By the act of 1766 385,459 11 7
+ By the act be 1779 130,739 14 5 1/2
+ ----------------------
+ Total 516,199 6 0 1/2
+
+If this tax be struck off, there will then remain about one million of
+surplus taxes; and as it is always proper to keep a sum in reserve, for
+incidental matters, it may be best not to extend reductions further in
+the first instance, but to consider what may be accomplished by other
+modes of reform.
+
+Among the taxes most heavily felt is the commutation tax. I shall
+therefore offer a plan for its abolition, by substituting another in its
+place, which will effect three objects at once: 1, that of removing
+the burthen to where it can best be borne; 2, restoring justice among
+families by a distribution of property; 3, extirpating the overgrown
+influence arising from the unnatural law of primogeniture, which is
+one of the principal sources of corruption at elections. The amount of
+commutation tax by the returns of 1788, was L771,657.
+
+When taxes are proposed, the country is amused by the plausible language
+of taxing luxuries. One thing is called a luxury at one time, and
+something else at another; but the real luxury does not consist in the
+article, but in the means of procuring it, and this is always kept out
+of sight.
+
+I know not why any plant or herb of the field should be a greater luxury
+in one country than another; but an overgrown estate in either is a
+luxury at all times, and, as such, is the proper object of taxation. It
+is, therefore, right to take those kind tax-making gentlemen up on their
+own word, and argue on the principle themselves have laid down, that of
+taxing luxuries. If they or their champion, Mr. Burke, who, I fear, is
+growing out of date, like the man in armour, can prove that an estate of
+twenty, thirty, or forty thousand pounds a year is not a luxury, I will
+give up the argument.
+
+Admitting that any annual sum, say, for instance, one thousand pounds,
+is necessary or sufficient for the support of a family, consequently the
+second thousand is of the nature of a luxury, the third still more so,
+and by proceeding on, we shall at last arrive at a sum that may not
+improperly be called a prohibitable luxury. It would be impolitic to set
+bounds to property acquired by industry, and therefore it is right to
+place the prohibition beyond the probable acquisition to which
+industry can extend; but there ought to be a limit to property or the
+accumulation of it by bequest. It should pass in some other line. The
+richest in every nation have poor relations, and those often very near
+in consanguinity.
+
+The following table of progressive taxation is constructed on the above
+principles, and as a substitute for the commutation tax. It will reach
+the point of prohibition by a regular operation, and thereby supersede
+the aristocratical law of primogeniture.
+
+ TABLE I
+ A tax on all estates of the clear yearly value of L50,
+ after deducting the land tax, and up
+
+ To L500 0s 3d per pound
+ From L500 to L1,000 0 6
+ On the second thousand 0 9
+ On the third " 1 0
+ On the fourth " 1 6
+ On the fifth " 2 0
+ On the sixth " 3 0
+ On the seventh " 4 0
+ On the eighth " 5 0
+ On the ninth " 6s 0d per pound
+ On the tenth " 7 0
+ On the eleventh " 8 0
+ On the twelfth " 9 0
+ On the thirteenth " 10 0
+ On the fourteenth " 11 0
+ On the fifteenth " 12 0
+ On the sixteenth " 13 0
+ On the seventeenth " 14 0
+ On the eighteenth " 15 0
+ On the nineteenth " 16 0
+ On the twentieth " 17 0
+ On the twenty-first " 18 0
+ On the twenty-second " 19 0
+ On the twenty-third " 20 0
+
+The foregoing table shows the progression per pound on every progressive
+thousand. The following table shows the amount of the tax on every
+thousand separately, and in the last column the total amount of all the
+separate sums collected.
+
+ TABLE II
+ An estate of:
+ L 50 per annum at 3d per pound pays L0 12 6
+ 100 " " " " 1 5 0
+ 200 " " " " 2 10 0
+ 300 " " " " 3 15 0
+ 400 " " " " 5 0 0
+ 500 " " " " 7 5 0
+
+After L500, the tax of 6d. per pound takes place on the second L500;
+consequently an estate of L1,000 per annum pays L2l, 15s., and so on.
+
+ Total amount
+ For the 1st L500 at 0s 3d per pound L7 5s
+ 2nd " 0 6 14 10 L21 15s
+ 2nd 1000 at 0 9 37 11 59 5
+ 3rd " 1 0 50 0 109 5
+ (Total amount)
+ 4th 1000 at 1s 6d per pound L75 0s L184 5s
+ 5th " 2 0 100 0 284 5
+ 6th " 3 0 150 0 434 5
+ 7th " 4 0 200 0 634 5
+ 8th " 5 0 250 0 880 5
+ 9th " 6 0 300 0 1100 5
+ 10th " 7 0 350 0 1530 5
+ 11th " 8 0 400 0 1930 5
+ 12th " 9 0 450 0 2380 5
+ 13th " 10 0 500 0 2880 5
+ 14th " 11 0 550 0 3430 5
+ 15th " 12 0 600 0 4030 5
+ 16th " 13 0 650 0 4680 5
+ 17th " 14 0 700 0 5380 5
+ 18th " 15 0 750 0 6130 5
+ 19th " 16 0 800 0 6930 5
+ 20th " 17 0 850 0 7780 5
+ 21st " 18 0 900 0 8680 5
+ (Total amount)
+ 22nd 1000 at 19s 0d per pound L950 0s L9630 5s
+ 23rd " 20 0 1000 0 10630 5
+
+At the twenty-third thousand the tax becomes 20s. in the pound, and
+consequently every thousand beyond that sum can produce no profit but by
+dividing the estate. Yet formidable as this tax appears, it will not, I
+believe, produce so much as the commutation tax; should it produce more,
+it ought to be lowered to that amount upon estates under two or three
+thousand a year.
+
+On small and middling estates it is lighter (as it is intended to be)
+than the commutation tax. It is not till after seven or eight thousand
+a year that it begins to be heavy. The object is not so much the produce
+of the tax as the justice of the measure. The aristocracy has screened
+itself too much, and this serves to restore a part of the lost
+equilibrium.
+
+As an instance of its screening itself, it is only necessary to look
+back to the first establishment of the excise laws, at what is called
+the Restoration, or the coming of Charles the Second. The aristocratical
+interest then in power, commuted the feudal services itself was under,
+by laying a tax on beer brewed for sale; that is, they compounded with
+Charles for an exemption from those services for themselves and their
+heirs, by a tax to be paid by other people. The aristocracy do not
+purchase beer brewed for sale, but brew their own beer free of the duty,
+and if any commutation at that time were necessary, it ought to have
+been at the expense of those for whom the exemptions from those services
+were intended;*[37] instead of which, it was thrown on an entirely
+different class of men.
+
+But the chief object of this progressive tax (besides the justice of
+rendering taxes more equal than they are) is, as already stated, to
+extirpate the overgrown influence arising from the unnatural law of
+primogeniture, and which is one of the principal sources of corruption
+at elections.
+
+It would be attended with no good consequences to enquire how such vast
+estates as thirty, forty, or fifty thousand a year could commence, and
+that at a time when commerce and manufactures were not in a state to
+admit of such acquisitions. Let it be sufficient to remedy the evil by
+putting them in a condition of descending again to the community by the
+quiet means of apportioning them among all the heirs and heiresses of
+those families. This will be the more necessary, because hitherto the
+aristocracy have quartered their younger children and connections upon
+the public in useless posts, places and offices, which when abolished
+will leave them destitute, unless the law of primogeniture be also
+abolished or superseded.
+
+A progressive tax will, in a great measure, effect this object, and that
+as a matter of interest to the parties most immediately concerned, as
+will be seen by the following table; which shows the net produce upon
+every estate, after subtracting the tax. By this it will appear that
+after an estate exceeds thirteen or fourteen thousand a year, the
+remainder produces but little profit to the holder, and consequently,
+Will pass either to the younger children, or to other kindred.
+
+ TABLE III
+ Showing the net produce of every estate from one thousand
+ to twenty-three thousand pounds a year
+
+ No of thousand Total tax
+ per annum subtracted Net produce
+ L1000 L21 L979
+ 2000 59 1941
+ 3000 109 2891
+ 4000 184 3816
+ 5000 284 4716
+ 6000 434 5566
+ 7000 634 6366
+ 8000 880 7120
+ 9000 1100 7900
+ 10,000 1530 8470
+ 11,000 1930 9070
+ 12,000 2380 9620
+ 13,000 2880 10,120
+ (No of thousand (Total tax
+ per annum) subtracted) (Net produce)
+ 14,000 3430 10,570
+ 15,000 4030 10,970
+ 16,000 4680 11,320
+ 17,000 5380 11,620
+ 18,000 6130 11,870
+ 19,000 6930 12,170
+ 20,000 7780 12,220
+ 21,000 8680 12,320
+ 22,000 9630 12,370
+ 23,000 10,630 12,370
+
+N.B. The odd shillings are dropped in this table.
+
+According to this table, an estate cannot produce more than L12,370
+clear of the land tax and the progressive tax, and therefore the
+dividing such estates will follow as a matter of family interest. An
+estate of L23,000 a year, divided into five estates of four thousand
+each and one of three, will be charged only L1,129 which is but five per
+cent., but if held by one possessor, will be charged L10,630.
+
+Although an enquiry into the origin of those estates be unnecessary, the
+continuation of them in their present state is another subject. It is a
+matter of national concern. As hereditary estates, the law has created
+the evil, and it ought also to provide the remedy. Primogeniture ought
+to be abolished, not only because it is unnatural and unjust, but
+because the country suffers by its operation. By cutting off (as before
+observed) the younger children from their proper portion of inheritance,
+the public is loaded with the expense of maintaining them; and the
+freedom of elections violated by the overbearing influence which
+this unjust monopoly of family property produces. Nor is this all. It
+occasions a waste of national property. A considerable part of the land
+of the country is rendered unproductive, by the great extent of parks
+and chases which this law serves to keep up, and this at a time when
+the annual production of grain is not equal to the national
+consumption.*[38]--In short, the evils of the aristocratical system are
+so great and numerous, so inconsistent with every thing that is just,
+wise, natural, and beneficent, that when they are considered, there
+ought not to be a doubt that many, who are now classed under that
+description, will wish to see such a system abolished.
+
+What pleasure can they derive from contemplating the exposed
+condition, and almost certain beggary of their younger offspring? Every
+aristocratical family has an appendage of family beggars hanging round
+it, which in a few ages, or a few generations, are shook off, and
+console themselves with telling their tale in almshouses, workhouses,
+and prisons. This is the natural consequence of aristocracy. The peer
+and the beggar are often of the same family. One extreme produces the
+other: to make one rich many must be made poor; neither can the system
+be supported by other means.
+
+There are two classes of people to whom the laws of England are
+particularly hostile, and those the most helpless; younger children,
+and the poor. Of the former I have just spoken; of the latter I shall
+mention one instance out of the many that might be produced, and with
+which I shall close this subject.
+
+Several laws are in existence for regulating and limiting work-men's
+wages. Why not leave them as free to make their own bargains, as the
+law-makers are to let their farms and houses? Personal labour is all
+the property they have. Why is that little, and the little freedom they
+enjoy, to be infringed? But the injustice will appear stronger, if we
+consider the operation and effect of such laws. When wages are fixed
+by what is called a law, the legal wages remain stationary, while every
+thing else is in progression; and as those who make that law still
+continue to lay on new taxes by other laws, they increase the expense of
+living by one law, and take away the means by another.
+
+But if these gentlemen law-makers and tax-makers thought it right to
+limit the poor pittance which personal labour can produce, and on which
+a whole family is to be supported, they certainly must feel themselves
+happily indulged in a limitation on their own part, of not less than
+twelve thousand a-year, and that of property they never acquired (nor
+probably any of their ancestors), and of which they have made never
+acquire so ill a use.
+
+Having now finished this subject, I shall bring the several particulars
+into one view, and then proceed to other matters.
+
+The first eight articles, mentioned earlier, are;
+
+1. Abolition of two millions poor-rates.
+
+2. Provision for two hundred and fifty-two thousand poor families, at
+the rate of four pounds per head for each child under fourteen years of
+age; which, with the addition of two hundred and fifty thousand pounds,
+provides also education for one million and thirty thousand children.
+
+3. Annuity of six pounds (per annum) each for all poor persons, decayed
+tradesmen, and others (supposed seventy thousand) of the age of fifty
+years, and until sixty.
+
+4. Annuity of ten pounds each for life for all poor persons, decayed
+tradesmen, and others (supposed seventy thousand) of the age of sixty
+years.
+
+5. Donation of twenty shillings each for fifty thousand births.
+
+6. Donation of twenty shillings each for twenty thousand marriages.
+
+7. Allowance of twenty thousand pounds for the funeral expenses of
+persons travelling for work, and dying at a distance from their friends.
+
+8. Employment at all times for the casual poor in the cities of London
+and Westminster.
+
+Second Enumeration
+
+9. Abolition of the tax on houses and windows.
+
+10. Allowance of three shillings per week for life to fifteen thousand
+disbanded soldiers, and a proportionate allowance to the officers of the
+disbanded corps.
+
+11. Increase of pay to the remaining soldiers of L19,500 annually.
+
+12. The same allowance to the disbanded navy, and the same increase of
+pay, as to the army.
+
+13. Abolition of the commutation tax.
+
+14. Plan of a progressive tax, operating to extirpate the unjust
+and unnatural law of primogeniture, and the vicious influence of the
+aristocratical system.*[39]
+
+There yet remains, as already stated, one million of surplus taxes. Some
+part of this will be required for circumstances that do not immediately
+present themselves, and such part as shall not be wanted, will admit of
+a further reduction of taxes equal to that amount.
+
+Among the claims that justice requires to be made, the condition of the
+inferior revenue-officers will merit attention. It is a reproach to
+any government to waste such an immensity of revenue in sinecures and
+nominal and unnecessary places and officers, and not allow even a decent
+livelihood to those on whom the labour falls. The salary of the inferior
+officers of the revenue has stood at the petty pittance of less than
+fifty pounds a year for upwards of one hundred years. It ought to be
+seventy. About one hundred and twenty thousand pounds applied to this
+purpose, will put all those salaries in a decent condition.
+
+This was proposed to be done almost twenty years ago, but the
+treasury-board then in being, startled at it, as it might lead to
+similar expectations from the army and navy; and the event was, that the
+King, or somebody for him, applied to parliament to have his own salary
+raised an hundred thousand pounds a year, which being done, every thing
+else was laid aside.
+
+With respect to another class of men, the inferior clergy, I forbear to
+enlarge on their condition; but all partialities and prejudices for,
+or against, different modes and forms of religion aside, common justice
+will determine, whether there ought to be an income of twenty or thirty
+pounds a year to one man, and of ten thousand to another. I speak on
+this subject with the more freedom, because I am known not to be a
+Presbyterian; and therefore the cant cry of court sycophants, about
+church and meeting, kept up to amuse and bewilder the nation, cannot be
+raised against me.
+
+Ye simple men on both sides the question, do you not see through this
+courtly craft? If ye can be kept disputing and wrangling about church
+and meeting, ye just answer the purpose of every courtier, who lives the
+while on the spoils of the taxes, and laughs at your credulity. Every
+religion is good that teaches man to be good; and I know of none that
+instructs him to be bad.
+
+All the before-mentioned calculations suppose only sixteen millions
+and an half of taxes paid into the exchequer, after the expense of
+collection and drawbacks at the custom-house and excise-office are
+deducted; whereas the sum paid into the exchequer is very nearly, if not
+quite, seventeen millions. The taxes raised in Scotland and Ireland are
+expended in those countries, and therefore their savings will come out
+of their own taxes; but if any part be paid into the English exchequer,
+it might be remitted. This will not make one hundred thousand pounds a
+year difference.
+
+There now remains only the national debt to be considered. In the year
+1789, the interest, exclusive of the tontine, was L9,150,138. How much
+the capital has been reduced since that time the minister best knows.
+But after paying the interest, abolishing the tax on houses and windows,
+the commutation tax, and the poor-rates; and making all the provisions
+for the poor, for the education of children, the support of the aged,
+the disbanded part of the army and navy, and increasing the pay of the
+remainder, there will be a surplus of one million.
+
+The present scheme of paying off the national debt appears to me,
+speaking as an indifferent person, to be an ill-concerted, if not a
+fallacious job. The burthen of the national debt consists not in its
+being so many millions, or so many hundred millions, but in the quantity
+of taxes collected every year to pay the interest. If this quantity
+continues the same, the burthen of the national debt is the same to all
+intents and purposes, be the capital more or less. The only knowledge
+which the public can have of the reduction of the debt, must be through
+the reduction of taxes for paying the interest. The debt, therefore,
+is not reduced one farthing to the public by all the millions that
+have been paid; and it would require more money now to purchase up the
+capital, than when the scheme began.
+
+Digressing for a moment at this point, to which I shall return again, I
+look back to the appointment of Mr. Pitt, as minister.
+
+I was then in America. The war was over; and though resentment had
+ceased, memory was still alive.
+
+When the news of the coalition arrived, though it was a matter of no
+concern to I felt it as a man. It had something in it which shocked, by
+publicly sporting with decency, if not with principle. It was impudence
+in Lord North; it was a want of firmness in Mr. Fox.
+
+Mr. Pitt was, at that time, what may be called a maiden character in
+politics. So far from being hackneyed, he appeared not to be initiated
+into the first mysteries of court intrigue. Everything was in his
+favour. Resentment against the coalition served as friendship to him,
+and his ignorance of vice was credited for virtue. With the return
+of peace, commerce and prosperity would rise of itself; yet even this
+increase was thrown to his account.
+
+When he came to the helm, the storm was over, and he had nothing to
+interrupt his course. It required even ingenuity to be wrong, and
+he succeeded. A little time showed him the same sort of man as his
+predecessors had been. Instead of profiting by those errors which had
+accumulated a burthen of taxes unparalleled in the world, he sought,
+I might almost say, he advertised for enemies, and provoked means to
+increase taxation. Aiming at something, he knew not what, he ransacked
+Europe and India for adventures, and abandoning the fair pretensions he
+began with, he became the knight-errant of modern times.
+
+It is unpleasant to see character throw itself away. It is more so to
+see one's-self deceived. Mr. Pitt had merited nothing, but he promised
+much. He gave symptoms of a mind superior to the meanness and corruption
+of courts. His apparent candour encouraged expectations; and the public
+confidence, stunned, wearied, and confounded by a chaos of parties,
+revived and attached itself to him. But mistaking, as he has done, the
+disgust of the nation against the coalition, for merit in himself,
+he has rushed into measures which a man less supported would not have
+presumed to act.
+
+All this seems to show that change of ministers amounts to nothing.
+One goes out, another comes in, and still the same measures, vices, and
+extravagance are pursued. It signifies not who is minister. The defect
+lies in the system. The foundation and the superstructure of the
+government is bad. Prop it as you please, it continually sinks into
+court government, and ever will.
+
+I return, as I promised, to the subject of the national debt, that
+offspring of the Dutch-Anglo revolution, and its handmaid the Hanover
+succession.
+
+But it is now too late to enquire how it began. Those to whom it is
+due have advanced the money; and whether it was well or ill spent, or
+pocketed, is not their crime. It is, however, easy to see, that as
+the nation proceeds in contemplating the nature and principles of
+government, and to understand taxes, and make comparisons between those
+of America, France, and England, it will be next to impossible to keep
+it in the same torpid state it has hitherto been. Some reform must,
+from the necessity of the case, soon begin. It is not whether these
+principles press with little or much force in the present moment. They
+are out. They are abroad in the world, and no force can stop them. Like
+a secret told, they are beyond recall; and he must be blind indeed that
+does not see that a change is already beginning.
+
+Nine millions of dead taxes is a serious thing; and this not only for
+bad, but in a great measure for foreign government. By putting the power
+of making war into the hands of the foreigners who came for what they
+could get, little else was to be expected than what has happened.
+
+Reasons are already advanced in this work, showing that whatever the
+reforms in the taxes may be, they ought to be made in the current
+expenses of government, and not in the part applied to the interest
+of the national debt. By remitting the taxes of the poor, they will be
+totally relieved, and all discontent will be taken away; and by striking
+off such of the taxes as are already mentioned, the nation will more
+than recover the whole expense of the mad American war.
+
+There will then remain only the national debt as a subject of
+discontent; and in order to remove, or rather to prevent this, it
+would be good policy in the stockholders themselves to consider it as
+property, subject like all other property, to bear some portion of the
+taxes. It would give to it both popularity and security, and as a great
+part of its present inconvenience is balanced by the capital which it
+keeps alive, a measure of this kind would so far add to that balance as
+to silence objections.
+
+This may be done by such gradual means as to accomplish all that is
+necessary with the greatest ease and convenience.
+
+Instead of taxing the capital, the best method would be to tax the
+interest by some progressive ratio, and to lessen the public taxes in
+the same proportion as the interest diminished.
+
+Suppose the interest was taxed one halfpenny in the pound the first
+year, a penny more the second, and to proceed by a certain ratio to be
+determined upon, always less than any other tax upon property. Such
+a tax would be subtracted from the interest at the time of payment,
+without any expense of collection.
+
+One halfpenny in the pound would lessen the interest and consequently
+the taxes, twenty thousand pounds. The tax on wagons amounts to this
+sum, and this tax might be taken off the first year. The second year the
+tax on female servants, or some other of the like amount might also be
+taken off, and by proceeding in this manner, always applying the tax
+raised from the property of the debt toward its extinction, and not
+carry it to the current services, it would liberate itself.
+
+The stockholders, notwithstanding this tax, would pay less taxes than
+they do now. What they would save by the extinction of the poor-rates,
+and the tax on houses and windows, and the commutation tax, would
+be considerably greater than what this tax, slow, but certain in its
+operation, amounts to.
+
+It appears to me to be prudence to look out for measures that may apply
+under any circumstances that may approach. There is, at this moment,
+a crisis in the affairs of Europe that requires it. Preparation now
+is wisdom. If taxation be once let loose, it will be difficult to
+re-instate it; neither would the relief be so effectual, as if it
+proceeded by some certain and gradual reduction.
+
+The fraud, hypocrisy, and imposition of governments, are now beginning
+to be too well understood to promise them any long career. The farce
+of monarchy and aristocracy, in all countries, is following that of
+chivalry, and Mr. Burke is dressing aristocracy, in all countries, is
+following that of chivalry, and Mr. Burke is dressing for the funeral.
+Let it then pass quietly to the tomb of all other follies, and the
+mourners be comforted.
+
+The time is not very distant when England will laugh at itself for
+sending to Holland, Hanover, Zell, or Brunswick for men, at the expense
+of a million a year, who understood neither her laws, her language, nor
+her interest, and whose capacities would scarcely have fitted them for
+the office of a parish constable. If government could be trusted to such
+hands, it must be some easy and simple thing indeed, and materials fit
+for all the purposes may be found in every town and village in England.
+
+When it shall be said in any country in the world, my poor are happy;
+neither ignorance nor distress is to be found among them; my jails are
+empty of prisoners, my streets of beggars; the aged are not in want, the
+taxes are not oppressive; the rational world is my friend, because I
+am the friend of its happiness: when these things can be said, then may
+that country boast its constitution and its government.
+
+Within the space of a few years we have seen two revolutions, those
+of America and France. In the former, the contest was long, and
+the conflict severe; in the latter, the nation acted with such a
+consolidated impulse, that having no foreign enemy to contend with, the
+revolution was complete in power the moment it appeared. From both those
+instances it is evident, that the greatest forces that can be brought
+into the field of revolutions, are reason and common interest. Where
+these can have the opportunity of acting, opposition dies with fear, or
+crumbles away by conviction. It is a great standing which they have now
+universally obtained; and we may hereafter hope to see revolutions, or
+changes in governments, produced with the same quiet operation by which
+any measure, determinable by reason and discussion, is accomplished.
+
+When a nation changes its opinion and habits of thinking, it is no
+longer to be governed as before; but it would not only be wrong, but
+bad policy, to attempt by force what ought to be accomplished by reason.
+Rebellion consists in forcibly opposing the general will of a nation,
+whether by a party or by a government. There ought, therefore, to be in
+every nation a method of occasionally ascertaining the state of public
+opinion with respect to government. On this point the old government of
+France was superior to the present government of England, because, on
+extraordinary occasions, recourse could be had what was then called the
+States General. But in England there are no such occasional bodies; and
+as to those who are now called Representatives, a great part of them are
+mere machines of the court, placemen, and dependants.
+
+I presume, that though all the people of England pay taxes, not an
+hundredth part of them are electors, and the members of one of the
+houses of parliament represent nobody but themselves. There is,
+therefore, no power but the voluntary will of the people that has a
+right to act in any matter respecting a general reform; and by the same
+right that two persons can confer on such a subject, a thousand may.
+The object, in all such preliminary proceedings, is to find out what the
+general sense of a nation is, and to be governed by it. If it prefer a
+bad or defective government to a reform or choose to pay ten times more
+taxes than there is any occasion for, it has a right so to do; and so
+long as the majority do not impose conditions on the minority, different
+from what they impose upon themselves, though there may be much error,
+there is no injustice. Neither will the error continue long. Reason and
+discussion will soon bring things right, however wrong they may begin.
+By such a process no tumult is to be apprehended. The poor, in all
+countries, are naturally both peaceable and grateful in all reforms in
+which their interest and happiness is included. It is only by neglecting
+and rejecting them that they become tumultuous.
+
+The objects that now press on the public attention are, the French
+revolution, and the prospect of a general revolution in governments.
+Of all nations in Europe there is none so much interested in the French
+revolution as England. Enemies for ages, and that at a vast expense,
+and without any national object, the opportunity now presents itself of
+amicably closing the scene, and joining their efforts to reform the rest
+of Europe. By doing this they will not only prevent the further effusion
+of blood, and increase of taxes, but be in a condition of getting rid
+of a considerable part of their present burthens, as has been already
+stated. Long experience however has shown, that reforms of this kind are
+not those which old governments wish to promote, and therefore it is
+to nations, and not to such governments, that these matters present
+themselves.
+
+In the preceding part of this work, I have spoken of an alliance between
+England, France, and America, for purposes that were to be afterwards
+mentioned. Though I have no direct authority on the part of America,
+I have good reason to conclude, that she is disposed to enter into a
+consideration of such a measure, provided, that the governments with
+which she might ally, acted as national governments, and not as courts
+enveloped in intrigue and mystery. That France as a nation, and a
+national government, would prefer an alliance with England, is a matter
+of certainty. Nations, like individuals, who have long been enemies,
+without knowing each other, or knowing why, become the better friends
+when they discover the errors and impositions under which they had
+acted.
+
+Admitting, therefore, the probability of such a connection, I will state
+some matters by which such an alliance, together with that of Holland,
+might render service, not only to the parties immediately concerned, but
+to all Europe.
+
+It is, I think, certain, that if the fleets of England, France, and
+Holland were confederated, they could propose, with effect, a limitation
+to, and a general dismantling of, all the navies in Europe, to a certain
+proportion to be agreed upon.
+
+First, That no new ship of war shall be built by any power in Europe,
+themselves included.
+
+Second, That all the navies now in existence shall be put back, suppose
+to one-tenth of their present force. This will save to France and
+England, at least two millions sterling annually to each, and their
+relative force be in the same proportion as it is now. If men will
+permit themselves to think, as rational beings ought to think,
+nothing can appear more ridiculous and absurd, exclusive of all moral
+reflections, than to be at the expense of building navies, filling them
+with men, and then hauling them into the ocean, to try which can
+sink each other fastest. Peace, which costs nothing, is attended with
+infinitely more advantage, than any victory with all its expense. But
+this, though it best answers the purpose of nations, does not that
+of court governments, whose habited policy is pretence for taxation,
+places, and offices.
+
+It is, I think, also certain, that the above confederated powers,
+together with that of the United States of America, can propose with
+effect, to Spain, the independence of South America, and the opening
+those countries of immense extent and wealth to the general commerce of
+the world, as North America now is.
+
+With how much more glory, and advantage to itself, does a nation act,
+when it exerts its powers to rescue the world from bondage, and to
+create itself friends, than when it employs those powers to increase
+ruin, desolation, and misery. The horrid scene that is now acting by the
+English government in the East-Indies, is fit only to be told of Goths
+and Vandals, who, destitute of principle, robbed and tortured the world
+they were incapable of enjoying.
+
+The opening of South America would produce an immense field of commerce,
+and a ready money market for manufactures, which the eastern world does
+not. The East is already a country full of manufactures, the importation
+of which is not only an injury to the manufactures of England, but a
+drain upon its specie. The balance against England by this trade is
+regularly upwards of half a million annually sent out in the East-India
+ships in silver; and this is the reason, together with German intrigue,
+and German subsidies, that there is so little silver in England.
+
+But any war is harvest to such governments, however ruinous it may be
+to a nation. It serves to keep up deceitful expectations which prevent
+people from looking into the defects and abuses of government. It is the
+lo here! and the lo there! that amuses and cheats the multitude.
+
+Never did so great an opportunity offer itself to England, and to all
+Europe, as is produced by the two Revolutions of America and France. By
+the former, freedom has a national champion in the western world; and by
+the latter, in Europe. When another nation shall join France, despotism
+and bad government will scarcely dare to appear. To use a trite
+expression, the iron is becoming hot all over Europe. The insulted
+German and the enslaved Spaniard, the Russ and the Pole, are beginning
+to think. The present age will hereafter merit to be called the Age of
+Reason, and the present generation will appear to the future as the Adam
+of a new world.
+
+When all the governments of Europe shall be established on the
+representative system, nations will become acquainted, and the
+animosities and prejudices fomented by the intrigue and artifice of
+courts, will cease. The oppressed soldier will become a freeman; and
+the tortured sailor, no longer dragged through the streets like a felon,
+will pursue his mercantile voyage in safety. It would be better that
+nations should wi continue the pay of their soldiers during their lives,
+and give them their discharge and restore them to freedom and their
+friends, and cease recruiting, than retain such multitudes at the
+same expense, in a condition useless to society and to themselves. As
+soldiers have hitherto been treated in most countries, they might be
+said to be without a friend. Shunned by the citizen on an apprehension
+of their being enemies to liberty, and too often insulted by those
+who commanded them, their condition was a double oppression. But where
+genuine principles of liberty pervade a people, every thing is restored
+to order; and the soldier civilly treated, returns the civility.
+
+In contemplating revolutions, it is easy to perceive that they may arise
+from two distinct causes; the one, to avoid or get rid of some great
+calamity; the other, to obtain some great and positive good; and the two
+may be distinguished by the names of active and passive revolutions. In
+those which proceed from the former cause, the temper becomes incensed
+and soured; and the redress, obtained by danger, is too often sullied by
+revenge. But in those which proceed from the latter, the heart, rather
+animated than agitated, enters serenely upon the subject. Reason
+and discussion, persuasion and conviction, become the weapons in the
+contest, and it is only when those are attempted to be suppressed that
+recourse is had to violence. When men unite in agreeing that a thing is
+good, could it be obtained, such for instance as relief from a burden
+of taxes and the extinction of corruption, the object is more than half
+accomplished. What they approve as the end, they will promote in the
+means.
+
+Will any man say, in the present excess of taxation, falling so heavily
+on the poor, that a remission of five pounds annually of taxes to one
+hundred and four thousand poor families is not a good thing? Will he say
+that a remission of seven pounds annually to one hundred thousand other
+poor families--of eight pounds annually to another hundred thousand poor
+families, and of ten pounds annually to fifty thousand poor and widowed
+families, are not good things? And, to proceed a step further in this
+climax, will he say that to provide against the misfortunes to which
+all human life is subject, by securing six pounds annually for all poor,
+distressed, and reduced persons of the age of fifty and until sixty, and
+of ten pounds annually after sixty, is not a good thing?
+
+Will he say that an abolition of two millions of poor-rates to the
+house-keepers, and of the whole of the house and window-light tax and of
+the commutation tax is not a good thing? Or will he say that to abolish
+corruption is a bad thing?
+
+If, therefore, the good to be obtained be worthy of a passive, rational,
+and costless revolution, it would be bad policy to prefer waiting for
+a calamity that should force a violent one. I have no idea, considering
+the reforms which are now passing and spreading throughout Europe, that
+England will permit herself to be the last; and where the occasion and
+the opportunity quietly offer, it is better than to wait for a turbulent
+necessity. It may be considered as an honour to the animal faculties
+of man to obtain redress by courage and danger, but it is far greater
+honour to the rational faculties to accomplish the same object by
+reason, accommodation, and general consent.*[40]
+
+As reforms, or revolutions, call them which you please, extend
+themselves among nations, those nations will form connections and
+conventions, and when a few are thus confederated, the progress will
+be rapid, till despotism and corrupt government be totally expelled, at
+least out of two quarters of the world, Europe and America. The Algerine
+piracy may then be commanded to cease, for it is only by the malicious
+policy of old governments, against each other, that it exists.
+
+Throughout this work, various and numerous as the subjects are, which
+I have taken up and investigated, there is only a single paragraph
+upon religion, viz. "that every religion is good that teaches man to be
+good."
+
+I have carefully avoided to enlarge upon the subject, because I am
+inclined to believe that what is called the present ministry, wish to
+see contentions about religion kept up, to prevent the nation turning
+its attention to subjects of government. It is as if they were to say,
+"Look that way, or any way, but this."
+
+But as religion is very improperly made a political machine, and the
+reality of it is thereby destroyed, I will conclude this work with
+stating in what light religion appears to me.
+
+If we suppose a large family of children, who, on any particular day,
+or particular circumstance, made it a custom to present to their parents
+some token of their affection and gratitude, each of them would make a
+different offering, and most probably in a different manner. Some would
+pay their congratulations in themes of verse and prose, by some little
+devices, as their genius dictated, or according to what they thought
+would please; and, perhaps, the least of all, not able to do any of
+those things, would ramble into the garden, or the field, and gather
+what it thought the prettiest flower it could find, though, perhaps, it
+might be but a simple weed. The parent would be more gratified by such
+a variety, than if the whole of them had acted on a concerted plan,
+and each had made exactly the same offering. This would have the cold
+appearance of contrivance, or the harsh one of control. But of all
+unwelcome things, nothing could more afflict the parent than to know,
+that the whole of them had afterwards gotten together by the ears, boys
+and girls, fighting, scratching, reviling, and abusing each other about
+which was the best or the worst present.
+
+Why may we not suppose, that the great Father of all is pleased with
+variety of devotion; and that the greatest offence we can act, is that
+by which we seek to torment and render each other miserable? For my own
+part, I am fully satisfied that what I am now doing, with an endeavour
+to conciliate mankind, to render their condition happy, to unite nations
+that have hitherto been enemies, and to extirpate the horrid practice of
+war, and break the chains of slavery and oppression is acceptable in his
+sight, and being the best service I can perform, I act it cheerfully.
+
+I do not believe that any two men, on what are called doctrinal points,
+think alike who think at all. It is only those who have not thought that
+appear to agree. It is in this case as with what is called the British
+constitution. It has been taken for granted to be good, and encomiums
+have supplied the place of proof. But when the nation comes to examine
+into its principles and the abuses it admits, it will be found to have
+more defects than I have pointed out in this work and the former.
+
+As to what are called national religions, we may, with as much
+propriety, talk of national Gods. It is either political craft or the
+remains of the Pagan system, when every nation had its separate and
+particular deity. Among all the writers of the English church clergy,
+who have treated on the general subject of religion, the present Bishop
+of Llandaff has not been excelled, and it is with much pleasure that I
+take this opportunity of expressing this token of respect.
+
+I have now gone through the whole of the subject, at least, as far as it
+appears to me at present. It has been my intention for the five years I
+have been in Europe, to offer an address to the people of England on
+the subject of government, if the opportunity presented itself before I
+returned to America. Mr. Burke has thrown it in my way, and I thank
+him. On a certain occasion, three years ago, I pressed him to propose a
+national convention, to be fairly elected, for the purpose of taking
+the state of the nation into consideration; but I found, that however
+strongly the parliamentary current was then setting against the party
+he acted with, their policy was to keep every thing within that field
+of corruption, and trust to accidents. Long experience had shown that
+parliaments would follow any change of ministers, and on this they
+rested their hopes and their expectations.
+
+Formerly, when divisions arose respecting governments, recourse was had
+to the sword, and a civil war ensued. That savage custom is exploded by
+the new system, and reference is had to national conventions. Discussion
+and the general will arbitrates the question, and to this, private
+opinion yields with a good grace, and order is preserved uninterrupted.
+
+Some gentlemen have affected to call the principles upon which this
+work and the former part of Rights of Man are founded, "a new-fangled
+doctrine." The question is not whether those principles are new or old,
+but whether they are right or wrong. Suppose the former, I will show
+their effect by a figure easily understood.
+
+It is now towards the middle of February. Were I to take a turn into
+the country, the trees would present a leafless, wintery appearance. As
+people are apt to pluck twigs as they walk along, I perhaps might do the
+same, and by chance might observe, that a single bud on that twig had
+begun to swell. I should reason very unnaturally, or rather not reason
+at all, to suppose this was the only bud in England which had this
+appearance. Instead of deciding thus, I should instantly conclude, that
+the same appearance was beginning, or about to begin, every where; and
+though the vegetable sleep will continue longer on some trees and plants
+than on others, and though some of them may not blossom for two or three
+years, all will be in leaf in the summer, except those which are rotten.
+What pace the political summer may keep with the natural, no human
+foresight can determine. It is, however, not difficult to perceive
+that the spring is begun.--Thus wishing, as I sincerely do, freedom and
+happiness to all nations, I close the Second Part.
+
+
+
+
+APPENDIX
+
+As the publication of this work has been delayed beyond the time
+intended, I think it not improper, all circumstances considered, to
+state the causes that have occasioned delay.
+
+The reader will probably observe, that some parts in the plan contained
+in this work for reducing the taxes, and certain parts in Mr. Pitt's
+speech at the opening of the present session, Tuesday, January 31, are
+so much alike as to induce a belief, that either the author had taken
+the hint from Mr. Pitt, or Mr. Pitt from the author.--I will first point
+out the parts that are similar, and then state such circumstances as I
+am acquainted with, leaving the reader to make his own conclusion.
+
+Considering it as almost an unprecedented case, that taxes should
+be proposed to be taken off, it is equally extraordinary that such a
+measure should occur to two persons at the same time; and still more
+so (considering the vast variety and multiplicity of taxes) that they
+should hit on the same specific taxes. Mr. Pitt has mentioned, in his
+speech, the tax on Carts and Wagons--that on Female Servantsthe lowering
+the tax on Candles and the taking off the tax of three shillings on
+Houses having under seven windows.
+
+Every one of those specific taxes are a part of the plan contained in
+this work, and proposed also to be taken off. Mr. Pitt's plan, it is
+true, goes no further than to a reduction of three hundred and twenty
+thousand pounds; and the reduction proposed in this work, to nearly six
+millions. I have made my calculations on only sixteen millions and an
+half of revenue, still asserting that it was "very nearly, if not quite,
+seventeen millions." Mr. Pitt states it at 16,690,000. I know enough of
+the matter to say, that he has not overstated it. Having thus given the
+particulars, which correspond in this work and his speech, I will state
+a chain of circumstances that may lead to some explanation.
+
+The first hint for lessening the taxes, and that as a consequence
+flowing from the French revolution, is to be found in the Address and
+Declaration of the Gentlemen who met at the Thatched-House Tavern,
+August 20, 1791. Among many other particulars stated in that Address, is
+the following, put as an interrogation to the government opposers of the
+French Revolution. "Are they sorry that the pretence for new oppressive
+taxes, and the occasion for continuing many old taxes will be at an
+end?"
+
+It is well known that the persons who chiefly frequent the
+Thatched-House Tavern, are men of court connections, and so much did
+they take this Address and Declaration respecting the French Revolution,
+and the reduction of taxes in disgust, that the Landlord was under the
+necessity of informing the Gentlemen, who composed the meeting of the
+20th of August, and who proposed holding another meeting, that he could
+not receive them.*[41]
+
+What was only hinted in the Address and Declaration respecting taxes and
+principles of government, will be found reduced to a regular system in
+this work. But as Mr. Pitt's speech contains some of the same things
+respecting taxes, I now come to give the circumstances before alluded
+to.
+
+The case is: This work was intended to be published just before the
+meeting of Parliament, and for that purpose a considerable part of
+the copy was put into the printer's hands in September, and all the
+remaining copy, which contains the part to which Mr. Pitt's speech
+is similar, was given to him full six weeks before the meeting of
+Parliament, and he was informed of the time at which it was to appear.
+He had composed nearly the whole about a fortnight before the time of
+Parliament meeting, and had given me a proof of the next sheet. It was
+then in sufficient forwardness to be out at the time proposed, as two
+other sheets were ready for striking off. I had before told him, that
+if he thought he should be straitened for time, I could get part of
+the work done at another press, which he desired me not to do. In this
+manner the work stood on the Tuesday fortnight preceding the meeting of
+Parliament, when all at once, without any previous intimation, though I
+had been with him the evening before, he sent me, by one of his
+workmen, all the remaining copy, declining to go on with the work on any
+consideration.
+
+To account for this extraordinary conduct I was totally at a loss, as
+he stopped at the part where the arguments on systems and principles of
+government closed, and where the plan for the reduction of taxes, the
+education of children, and the support of the poor and the aged begins;
+and still more especially, as he had, at the time of his beginning to
+print, and before he had seen the whole copy, offered a thousand pounds
+for the copy-right, together with the future copy-right of the former
+part of the Rights of Man. I told the person who brought me this offer
+that I should not accept it, and wished it not to be renewed, giving him
+as my reason, that though I believed the printer to be an honest man, I
+would never put it in the power of any printer or publisher to suppress
+or alter a work of mine, by making him master of the copy, or give to
+him the right of selling it to any minister, or to any other person,
+or to treat as a mere matter of traffic, that which I intended should
+operate as a principle.
+
+His refusal to complete the work (which he could not purchase) obliged
+me to seek for another printer, and this of consequence would throw
+the publication back till after the meeting of Parliament, otherways it
+would have appeared that Mr. Pitt had only taken up a part of the plan
+which I had more fully stated.
+
+Whether that gentleman, or any other, had seen the work, or any part of
+it, is more than I have authority to say. But the manner in which the
+work was returned, and the particular time at which this was done, and
+that after the offers he had made, are suspicious circumstances. I know
+what the opinion of booksellers and publishers is upon such a case, but
+as to my own opinion, I choose to make no declaration. There are many
+ways by which proof sheets may be procured by other persons before a
+work publicly appears; to which I shall add a certain circumstance,
+which is,
+
+A ministerial bookseller in Piccadilly who has been employed, as common
+report says, by a clerk of one of the boards closely connected with
+the ministry (the board of trade and plantation, of which Hawkesbury is
+president) to publish what he calls my Life, (I wish his own life and
+those of the cabinet were as good), used to have his books printed at
+the same printing-office that I employed; but when the former part of
+Rights of Man came out, he took his work away in dudgeon; and about a
+week or ten days before the printer returned my copy, he came to
+make him an offer of his work again, which was accepted. This would
+consequently give him admission into the printing-office where the
+sheets of this work were then lying; and as booksellers and printers are
+free with each other, he would have the opportunity of seeing what was
+going on.--Be the case, however, as it may, Mr. Pitt's plan, little and
+diminutive as it is, would have made a very awkward appearance, had this
+work appeared at the time the printer had engaged to finish it.
+
+I have now stated the particulars which occasioned the delay, from the
+proposal to purchase, to the refusal to print. If all the Gentlemen
+are innocent, it is very unfortunate for them that such a variety of
+suspicious circumstances should, without any design, arrange themselves
+together.
+
+Having now finished this part, I will conclude with stating another
+circumstance.
+
+About a fortnight or three weeks before the meeting of Parliament, a
+small addition, amounting to about twelve shillings and sixpence a year,
+was made to the pay of the soldiers, or rather their pay was docked
+so much less. Some Gentlemen who knew, in part, that this work would
+contain a plan of reforms respecting the oppressed condition of
+soldiers, wished me to add a note to the work, signifying that the part
+upon that subject had been in the printer's hands some weeks before that
+addition of pay was proposed. I declined doing this, lest it should be
+interpreted into an air of vanity, or an endeavour to excite suspicion
+(for which perhaps there might be no grounds) that some of the
+government gentlemen had, by some means or other, made out what this
+work would contain: and had not the printing been interrupted so as
+to occasion a delay beyond the time fixed for publication, nothing
+contained in this appendix would have appeared.
+
+ Thomas Paine
+
+
+
+
+THE AUTHOR'S NOTES FOR PART ONE AND PART TWO
+
+
+[Footnote 1: The main and uniform maxim of the judges is, the greater the truth
+the greater the libel.]
+
+[Footnote 2: Since writing the above, two other places occur in Mr. Burke's
+pamphlet in which the name of the Bastille is mentioned, but in the same
+manner. In the one he introduces it in a sort of obscure question, and
+asks: "Will any ministers who now serve such a king, with but a decent
+appearance of respect, cordially obey the orders of those whom but the
+other day, in his name, they had committed to the Bastille?" In the
+other the taking it is mentioned as implying criminality in the French
+guards, who assisted in demolishing it. "They have not," says he,
+"forgot the taking the king's castles at Paris." This is Mr. Burke, who
+pretends to write on constitutional freedom.]
+
+[Footnote 3: I am warranted in asserting this, as I had it personally from M.
+de la Fayette, with whom I lived in habits of friendship for fourteen
+years.]
+
+[Footnote 4: An account of the expedition to Versailles may be seen in No. 13 of
+the Revolution de Paris containing the events from the 3rd to the 10th
+of October, 1789.]
+
+[Footnote 5: It is a practice in some parts of the country, when two travellers
+have but one horse, which, like the national purse, will not carry
+double, that the one mounts and rides two or three miles ahead, and then
+ties the horse to a gate and walks on. When the second traveller arrives
+he takes the horse, rides on, and passes his companion a mile or two,
+and ties again, and so on--Ride and tie.]
+
+[Footnote 6: The word he used was renvoye, dismissed or sent away.]
+
+[Footnote 7: When in any country we see extraordinary circumstances taking
+place, they naturally lead any man who has a talent for observation
+and investigation, to enquire into the causes. The manufacturers of
+Manchester, Birmingham, and Sheffield, are the principal manufacturers
+in England. From whence did this arise? A little observation will
+explain the case. The principal, and the generality of the inhabitants
+of those places, are not of what is called in England, the church
+established by law: and they, or their fathers, (for it is within but a
+few years) withdrew from the persecution of the chartered towns, where
+test-laws more particularly operate, and established a sort of asylum
+for themselves in those places. It was the only asylum that then
+offered, for the rest of Europe was worse.--But the case is now
+changing. France and America bid all comers welcome, and initiate them
+into all the rights of citizenship. Policy and interest, therefore,
+will, but perhaps too late, dictate in England, what reason and justice
+could not. Those manufacturers are withdrawing, and arising in other
+places. There is now erecting in Passey, three miles from Paris, a large
+cotton manufactory, and several are already erected in America. Soon
+after the rejecting the Bill for repealing the test-law, one of the
+richest manufacturers in England said in my hearing, "England, Sir, is
+not a country for a dissenter to live in,--we must go to France." These
+are truths, and it is doing justice to both parties to tell them. It
+is chiefly the dissenters that have carried English manufactures to the
+height they are now at, and the same men have it in their power to carry
+them away; and though those manufactures would afterwards continue in
+those places, the foreign market will be lost. There frequently appear
+in the London Gazette, extracts from certain acts to prevent machines
+and persons, as far as they can extend to persons, from going out of the
+country. It appears from these that the ill effects of the test-laws and
+church-establishment begin to be much suspected; but the remedy of force
+can never supply the remedy of reason. In the progress of less than a
+century, all the unrepresented part of England, of all denominations,
+which is at least an hundred times the most numerous, may begin to feel
+the necessity of a constitution, and then all those matters will come
+regularly before them.]
+
+[Footnote 8: When the English Minister, Mr. Pitt, mentions the French finances
+again in the English Parliament, it would be well that he noticed this
+as an example.]
+
+[Footnote 9: Mr. Burke, (and I must take the liberty of telling him that he is
+very unacquainted with French affairs), speaking upon this subject,
+says, "The first thing that struck me in calling the States-General,
+was a great departure from the ancient course";--and he soon after says,
+"From the moment I read the list, I saw distinctly, and very nearly as
+it has happened, all that was to follow."--Mr. Burke certainly did not
+see an that was to follow. I endeavoured to impress him, as well before
+as after the States-General met, that there would be a revolution; but
+was not able to make him see it, neither would he believe it. How then
+he could distinctly see all the parts, when the whole was out of sight,
+is beyond my comprehension. And with respect to the "departure from the
+ancient course," besides the natural weakness of the remark, it shows
+that he is unacquainted with circumstances. The departure was necessary,
+from the experience had upon it, that the ancient course was a bad one.
+The States-General of 1614 were called at the commencement of the civil
+war in the minority of Louis XIII.; but by the class of arranging them
+by orders, they increased the confusion they were called to compose. The
+author of L'Intrigue du Cabinet, (Intrigue of the Cabinet), who
+wrote before any revolution was thought of in France, speaking of the
+States-General of 1614, says, "They held the public in suspense five
+months; and by the questions agitated therein, and the heat with which
+they were put, it appears that the great (les grands) thought more to
+satisfy their particular passions, than to procure the goods of the
+nation; and the whole time passed away in altercations, ceremonies and
+parade."--L'Intrigue du Cabinet, vol. i. p. 329.]
+
+[Footnote 10: There is a single idea, which, if it strikes rightly upon the mind,
+either in a legal or a religious sense, will prevent any man or any body
+of men, or any government, from going wrong on the subject of religion;
+which is, that before any human institutions of government were known in
+the world, there existed, if I may so express it, a compact between
+God and man, from the beginning of time: and that as the relation and
+condition which man in his individual person stands in towards his Maker
+cannot be changed by any human laws or human authority, that religious
+devotion, which is a part of this compact, cannot so much as be made a
+subject of human laws; and that all laws must conform themselves to this
+prior existing compact, and not assume to make the compact conform to
+the laws, which, besides being human, are subsequent thereto. The first
+act of man, when he looked around and saw himself a creature which he
+did not make, and a world furnished for his reception, must have been
+devotion; and devotion must ever continue sacred to every individual
+man, as it appears, right to him; and governments do mischief by
+interfering.]
+
+[Footnote 11: See this work, Part I starting at line number 254.--N.B. Since the
+taking of the Bastille, the occurrences have been published: but the
+matters recorded in this narrative, are prior to that period; and some
+of them, as may be easily seen, can be but very little known.]
+
+[Footnote 12: See "Estimate of the Comparative Strength of Great Britain," by G.
+Chalmers.]
+
+[Footnote 13: See "Administration of the Finances of France," vol. iii, by M.
+Neckar.]
+
+[Footnote 14: "Administration of the Finances of France," vol. iii.]
+
+[Footnote 15: Whether the English commerce does not bring in money, or whether the
+government sends it out after it is brought in, is a matter which the
+parties concerned can best explain; but that the deficiency exists, is
+not in the power of either to disprove. While Dr. Price, Mr. Eden, (now
+Auckland), Mr. Chalmers, and others, were debating whether the quantity
+of money in England was greater or less than at the Revolution, the
+circumstance was not adverted to, that since the Revolution, there
+cannot have been less than four hundred millions sterling imported into
+Europe; and therefore the quantity in England ought at least to have
+been four times greater than it was at the Revolution, to be on a
+proportion with Europe. What England is now doing by paper, is what she
+would have been able to do by solid money, if gold and silver had come
+into the nation in the proportion it ought, or had not been sent out;
+and she is endeavouring to restore by paper, the balance she has lost by
+money. It is certain, that the gold and silver which arrive annually
+in the register-ships to Spain and Portugal, do not remain in those
+countries. Taking the value half in gold and half in silver, it is about
+four hundred tons annually; and from the number of ships and galloons
+employed in the trade of bringing those metals from South-America to
+Portugal and Spain, the quantity sufficiently proves itself, without
+referring to the registers.
+
+In the situation England now is, it is impossible she can increase in
+money. High taxes not only lessen the property of the individuals, but
+they lessen also the money capital of the nation, by inducing smuggling,
+which can only be carried on by gold and silver. By the politics which
+the British Government have carried on with the Inland Powers of Germany
+and the Continent, it has made an enemy of all the Maritime Powers, and
+is therefore obliged to keep up a large navy; but though the navy is
+built in England, the naval stores must be purchased from abroad, and
+that from countries where the greatest part must be paid for in gold
+and silver. Some fallacious rumours have been set afloat in England to
+induce a belief in money, and, among others, that of the French refugees
+bringing great quantities. The idea is ridiculous. The general part of
+the money in France is silver; and it would take upwards of twenty of
+the largest broad wheel wagons, with ten horses each, to remove one
+million sterling of silver. Is it then to be supposed, that a few people
+fleeing on horse-back or in post-chaises, in a secret manner, and having
+the French Custom-House to pass, and the sea to cross, could bring even
+a sufficiency for their own expenses?
+
+When millions of money are spoken of, it should be recollected, that
+such sums can only accumulate in a country by slow degrees, and a long
+procession of time. The most frugal system that England could now adopt,
+would not recover in a century the balance she has lost in money since
+the commencement of the Hanover succession. She is seventy millions
+behind France, and she must be in some considerable proportion behind
+every country in Europe, because the returns of the English mint do not
+show an increase of money, while the registers of Lisbon and Cadiz
+show an European increase of between three and four hundred millions
+sterling.]
+
+[Footnote 16: That part of America which is generally called New-England,
+including New-Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode-Island, and Connecticut,
+is peopled chiefly by English descendants. In the state of New-York
+about half are Dutch, the rest English, Scotch, and Irish. In
+New-jersey, a mixture of English and Dutch, with some Scotch and Irish.
+In Pennsylvania about one third are English, another Germans, and
+the remainder Scotch and Irish, with some Swedes. The States to the
+southward have a greater proportion of English than the middle States,
+but in all of them there is a mixture; and besides those enumerated,
+there are a considerable number of French, and some few of all the
+European nations, lying on the coast. The most numerous religious
+denomination are the Presbyterians; but no one sect is established above
+another, and all men are equally citizens.]
+
+[Footnote 17: For a character of aristocracy, the reader is referred to Rights of
+Man, Part I., starting at line number 1457.]
+
+[Footnote 18: The whole amount of the assessed taxes of France, for the present
+year, is three hundred millions of francs, which is twelve millions
+and a half sterling; and the incidental taxes are estimated at three
+millions, making in the whole fifteen millions and a half; which among
+twenty-four millions of people, is not quite thirteen shillings per
+head. France has lessened her taxes since the revolution, nearly nine
+millions sterling annually. Before the revolution, the city of Paris
+paid a duty of upwards of thirty per cent. on all articles brought into
+the city. This tax was collected at the city gates. It was taken off on
+the first of last May, and the gates taken down.]
+
+[Footnote 19: What was called the livre rouge, or the red book, in France, was not
+exactly similar to the Court Calendar in England; but it sufficiently
+showed how a great part of the taxes was lavished.]
+
+[Footnote 20: In England the improvements in agriculture, useful arts,
+manufactures, and commerce, have been made in opposition to the genius
+of its government, which is that of following precedents. It is from
+the enterprise and industry of the individuals, and their numerous
+associations, in which, tritely speaking, government is neither pillow
+nor bolster, that these improvements have proceeded. No man thought
+about government, or who was in, or who was out, when he was planning
+or executing those things; and all he had to hope, with respect to
+government, was, that it would let him alone. Three or four very silly
+ministerial newspapers are continually offending against the spirit of
+national improvement, by ascribing it to a minister. They may with as
+much truth ascribe this book to a minister.]
+
+[Footnote 21: With respect to the two houses, of which the English parliament is
+composed, they appear to be effectually influenced into one, and, as a
+legislature, to have no temper of its own. The minister, whoever he
+at any time may be, touches it as with an opium wand, and it sleeps
+obedience.
+
+But if we look at the distinct abilities of the two houses, the
+difference will appear so great, as to show the inconsistency of
+placing power where there can be no certainty of the judgment to use
+it. Wretched as the state of representation is in England, it is manhood
+compared with what is called the house of Lords; and so little is this
+nick-named house regarded, that the people scarcely enquire at any time
+what it is doing. It appears also to be most under influence, and the
+furthest removed from the general interest of the nation. In the debate
+on engaging in the Russian and Turkish war, the majority in the house
+of peers in favor of it was upwards of ninety, when in the other house,
+which was more than double its numbers, the majority was sixty-three.]
+
+The proceedings on Mr. Fox's bill, respecting the rights of juries,
+merits also to be noticed. The persons called the peers were not the
+objects of that bill. They are already in possession of more privileges
+than that bill gave to others. They are their own jury, and if any one
+of that house were prosecuted for a libel, he would not suffer, even
+upon conviction, for the first offense. Such inequality in laws ought
+not to exist in any country. The French constitution says, that the law
+is the same to every individual, whether to Protect or to punish. All
+are equal in its sight.]
+
+[Footnote 22: As to the state of representation in England, it is too absurd to
+be reasoned upon. Almost all the represented parts are decreasing
+in population, and the unrepresented parts are increasing. A general
+convention of the nation is necessary to take the whole form of
+government into consideration.]
+
+[Footnote 23: It is related that in the canton of Berne, in Switzerland, it has
+been customary, from time immemorial, to keep a bear at the public
+expense, and the people had been taught to believe that if they had not
+a bear they should all be undone. It happened some years ago that the
+bear, then in being, was taken sick, and died too suddenly to have his
+place immediately supplied with another. During this interregnum the
+people discovered that the corn grew, and the vintage flourished, and
+the sun and moon continued to rise and set, and everything went on
+the same as before, and taking courage from these circumstances, they
+resolved not to keep any more bears; for, said they, "a bear is a very
+voracious expensive animal, and we were obliged to pull out his claws,
+lest he should hurt the citizens." The story of the bear of Berne was
+related in some of the French newspapers, at the time of the flight of
+Louis Xvi., and the application of it to monarchy could not be mistaken
+in France; but it seems that the aristocracy of Berne applied it to
+themselves, and have since prohibited the reading of French newspapers.]
+
+[Footnote 24: It is scarcely possible to touch on any subject, that will not
+suggest an allusion to some corruption in governments. The simile of
+"fortifications," unfortunately involves with it a circumstance, which
+is directly in point with the matter above alluded to.]
+
+Among the numerous instances of abuse which have been acted or protected
+by governments, ancient or modern, there is not a greater than that of
+quartering a man and his heirs upon the public, to be maintained at its
+expense.
+
+Humanity dictates a provision for the poor; but by what right, moral or
+political, does any government assume to say, that the person called
+the Duke of Richmond, shall be maintained by the public? Yet, if
+common report is true, not a beggar in London can purchase his wretched
+pittance of coal, without paying towards the civil list of the Duke of
+Richmond. Were the whole produce of this imposition but a shilling a
+year, the iniquitous principle would be still the same; but when it
+amounts, as it is said to do, to no less than twenty thousand pounds per
+annum, the enormity is too serious to be permitted to remain. This is
+one of the effects of monarchy and aristocracy.
+
+In stating this case I am led by no personal dislike. Though I think
+it mean in any man to live upon the public, the vice originates in the
+government; and so general is it become, that whether the parties are in
+the ministry or in the opposition, it makes no difference: they are sure
+of the guarantee of each other.]
+
+[Footnote 25: In America the increase of commerce is greater in proportion than in
+England. It is, at this time, at least one half more than at any period
+prior to the revolution. The greatest number of vessels cleared out
+of the port of Philadelphia, before the commencement of the war, was
+between eight and nine hundred. In the year 1788, the number was upwards
+of twelve hundred. As the State of Pennsylvania is estimated at an
+eighth part of the United States in population, the whole number of
+vessels must now be nearly ten thousand.]
+
+[Footnote 26: When I saw Mr. Pitt's mode of estimating the balance of trade, in
+one of his parliamentary speeches, he appeared to me to know nothing
+of the nature and interest of commerce; and no man has more wantonly
+tortured it than himself. During a period of peace it has been havocked
+with the calamities of war. Three times has it been thrown into
+stagnation, and the vessels unmanned by impressing, within less than
+four years of peace.]
+
+[Footnote 27: Rev. William Knowle, master of the grammar school of Thetford, in
+Norfolk.]
+
+[Footnote 28: Politics and self-interest have been so uniformly connected that
+the world, from being so often deceived, has a right to be suspicious of
+public characters, but with regard to myself I am perfectly easy on
+this head. I did not, at my first setting out in public life, nearly
+seventeen years ago, turn my thoughts to subjects of government from
+motives of interest, and my conduct from that moment to this proves the
+fact. I saw an opportunity in which I thought I could do some good, and
+I followed exactly what my heart dictated. I neither read books, nor
+studied other people's opinion. I thought for myself. The case was
+this:--
+
+During the suspension of the old governments in America, both prior to
+and at the breaking out of hostilities, I was struck with the order and
+decorum with which everything was conducted, and impressed with the idea
+that a little more than what society naturally performed was all the
+government that was necessary, and that monarchy and aristocracy were
+frauds and impositions upon mankind. On these principles I published the
+pamphlet Common Sense. The success it met with was beyond anything since
+the invention of printing. I gave the copyright to every state in the
+Union, and the demand ran to not less than one hundred thousand copies.
+I continued the subject in the same manner, under the title of The
+Crisis, till the complete establishment of the Revolution.
+
+After the declaration of independence Congress unanimously, and unknown
+to me, appointed me Secretary in the Foreign Department. This was
+agreeable to me, because it gave me the opportunity of seeing into the
+abilities of foreign courts, and their manner of doing business. But
+a misunderstanding arising between Congress and me, respecting one of
+their commissioners then in Europe, Mr. Silas Deane, I resigned the
+office, and declined at the same time the pecuniary offers made by the
+Ministers of France and Spain, M. Gerald and Don Juan Mirralles.]
+I had by this time so completely gained the ear and confidence of
+America, and my own independence was become so visible, as to give me a
+range in political writing beyond, perhaps, what any man ever possessed
+in any country, and, what is more extraordinary, I held it undiminished
+to the end of the war, and enjoy it in the same manner to the present
+moment. As my object was not myself, I set out with the determination,
+and happily with the disposition, of not being moved by praise or
+censure, friendship or calumny, nor of being drawn from my purpose by
+any personal altercation, and the man who cannot do this is not fit for
+a public character.
+
+When the war ended I went from Philadelphia to Borden-Town, on the east
+bank of the Delaware, where I have a small place. Congress was at this
+time at Prince-Town, fifteen miles distant, and General Washington
+had taken his headquarters at Rocky Hill, within the neighbourhood of
+Congress, for the purpose of resigning up his commission (the object
+for which he accepted it being accomplished), and of retiring to private
+life. While he was on this business he wrote me the letter which I here
+subjoin:
+
+"Rocky-Hill, Sept. 10, 1783.
+
+"I have learned since I have been at this place that you are at
+Borden-Town. Whether for the sake of retirement or economy I know not.
+Be it for either, for both, or whatever it may, if you will come to this
+place, and partake with me, I shall be exceedingly happy to see you at
+it.
+
+"Your presence may remind Congress of your past services to this
+country, and if it is in my power to impress them, command my best
+exertions with freedom, as they will be rendered cheerfully by one who
+entertains a lively sense of the importance of your works, and who, with
+much pleasure, subscribes himself, Your sincere friend,
+
+G. Washington."
+
+During the war, in the latter end of the year 1780, I formed to myself a
+design of coming over to England, and communicated it to General Greene,
+who was then in Philadelphia on his route to the southward, General
+Washington being then at too great a distance to communicate with
+immediately. I was strongly impressed with the idea that if I could get
+over to England without being known, and only remain in safety till I
+could get out a publication, that I could open the eyes of the country
+with respect to the madness and stupidity of its Government. I saw that
+the parties in Parliament had pitted themselves as far as they could go,
+and could make no new impressions on each other. General Greene entered
+fully into my views, but the affair of Arnold and Andre happening just
+after, he changed his mind, under strong apprehensions for my safety,
+wrote very pressingly to me from Annapolis, in Maryland, to give up
+the design, which, with some reluctance, I did. Soon after this I
+accompanied Colonel Lawrens, son of Mr. Lawrens, who was then in the
+Tower, to France on business from Congress. We landed at L'orient, and
+while I remained there, he being gone forward, a circumstance occurred
+that renewed my former design. An English packet from Falmouth to
+New York, with the Government dispatches on board, was brought into
+L'orient. That a packet should be taken is no extraordinary thing, but
+that the dispatches should be taken with it will scarcely be credited,
+as they are always slung at the cabin window in a bag loaded with
+cannon-ball, and ready to be sunk at a moment. The fact, however, is
+as I have stated it, for the dispatches came into my hands, and I
+read them. The capture, as I was informed, succeeded by the following
+stratagem:--The captain of the "Madame" privateer, who spoke English, on
+coming up with the packet, passed himself for the captain of an English
+frigate, and invited the captain of the packet on board, which, when
+done, he sent some of his own hands back, and he secured the mail. But
+be the circumstance of the capture what it may, I speak with certainty
+as to the Government dispatches. They were sent up to Paris to Count
+Vergennes, and when Colonel Lawrens and myself returned to America we
+took the originals to Congress.
+
+By these dispatches I saw into the stupidity of the English Cabinet far
+more than I otherwise could have done, and I renewed my former design.
+But Colonel Lawrens was so unwilling to return alone, more especially
+as, among other matters, we had a charge of upwards of two hundred
+thousand pounds sterling in money, that I gave in to his wishes, and
+finally gave up my plan. But I am now certain that if I could have
+executed it that it would not have been altogether unsuccessful.]
+
+[Footnote 29: It is difficult to account for the origin of charter and corporation
+towns, unless we suppose them to have arisen out of, or been connected
+with, some species of garrison service. The times in which they began
+justify this idea. The generality of those towns have been garrisons,
+and the corporations were charged with the care of the gates of the
+towns, when no military garrison was present. Their refusing or granting
+admission to strangers, which has produced the custom of giving,
+selling, and buying freedom, has more of the nature of garrison
+authority than civil government. Soldiers are free of all corporations
+throughout the nation, by the same propriety that every soldier is
+free of every garrison, and no other persons are. He can follow any
+employment, with the permission of his officers, in any corporation
+towns throughout the nation.]
+
+[Footnote 30: See Sir John Sinclair's History of the Revenue. The land-tax in 1646
+was L2,473,499.]
+
+[Footnote 31: Several of the court newspapers have of late made frequent mention
+of Wat Tyler. That his memory should be traduced by court sycophants and
+an those who live on the spoil of a public is not to be wondered at. He
+was, however, the means of checking the rage and injustice of taxation
+in his time, and the nation owed much to his valour. The history is
+concisely this:--In the time of Richard Ii. a poll tax was levied of one
+shilling per head upon every person in the nation of whatever estate or
+condition, on poor as well as rich, above the age of fifteen years. If
+any favour was shown in the law it was to the rich rather than to the
+poor, as no person could be charged more than twenty shillings for
+himself, family and servants, though ever so numerous; while all other
+families, under the number of twenty were charged per head. Poll taxes
+had always been odious, but this being also oppressive and unjust, it
+excited as it naturally must, universal detestation among the poor and
+middle classes. The person known by the name of Wat Tyler, whose proper
+name was Walter, and a tiler by trade, lived at Deptford. The gatherer
+of the poll tax, on coming to his house, demanded tax for one of
+his daughters, whom Tyler declared was under the age of fifteen. The
+tax-gatherer insisted on satisfying himself, and began an indecent
+examination of the girl, which, enraging the father, he struck him with
+a hammer that brought him to the ground, and was the cause of his
+death. This circumstance served to bring the discontent to an issue. The
+inhabitants of the neighbourhood espoused the cause of Tyler, who in a
+few days was joined, according to some histories, by upwards of fifty
+thousand men, and chosen their chief. With this force he marched
+to London, to demand an abolition of the tax and a redress of other
+grievances. The Court, finding itself in a forlorn condition, and,
+unable to make resistance, agreed, with Richard at its head, to hold
+a conference with Tyler in Smithfield, making many fair professions,
+courtier-like, of its dispositions to redress the oppressions. While
+Richard and Tyler were in conversation on these matters, each being on
+horseback, Walworth, then Mayor of London, and one of the creatures of
+the Court, watched an opportunity, and like a cowardly assassin, stabbed
+Tyler with a dagger, and two or three others falling upon him, he
+was instantly sacrificed. Tyler appears to have been an intrepid
+disinterested man with respect to himself. All his proposals made to
+Richard were on a more just and public ground than those which had
+been made to John by the Barons, and notwithstanding the sycophancy of
+historians and men like Mr. Burke, who seek to gloss over a base action
+of the Court by traducing Tyler, his fame will outlive their falsehood.
+If the Barons merited a monument to be erected at Runnymede, Tyler
+merited one in Smithfield.]
+
+[Footnote 32: I happened to be in England at the celebration of the centenary of
+the Revolution of 1688. The characters of William and Mary have always
+appeared to be detestable; the one seeking to destroy his uncle, and
+the other her father, to get possession of power themselves; yet, as
+the nation was disposed to think something of that event, I felt hurt at
+seeing it ascribe the whole reputation of it to a man who had undertaken
+it as a job and who, besides what he otherwise got, charged six hundred
+thousand pounds for the expense of the fleet that brought him from
+Holland. George the First acted the same close-fisted part as William
+had done, and bought the Duchy of Bremen with the money he got from
+England, two hundred and fifty thousand pounds over and above his pay as
+king, and having thus purchased it at the expense of England, added it
+to his Hanoverian dominions for his own private profit. In fact, every
+nation that does not govern itself is governed as a job. England has
+been the prey of jobs ever since the Revolution.]
+
+[Footnote 33: Charles, like his predecessors and successors, finding that war was
+the harvest of governments, engaged in a war with the Dutch, the expense
+of which increased the annual expenditure to L1,800,000 as stated under
+the date of 1666; but the peace establishment was but L1,200,000.]
+
+[Footnote 34: Poor-rates began about the time of Henry VIII., when the taxes began
+to increase, and they have increased as the taxes increased ever since.]
+
+[Footnote 35: Reckoning the taxes by families, five to a family, each family pays
+on an average L12 7s. 6d. per annum. To this sum are to be added the
+poor-rates. Though all pay taxes in the articles they consume, all do
+not pay poor-rates. About two millions are exempted: some as not being
+house-keepers, others as not being able, and the poor themselves
+who receive the relief. The average, therefore, of poor-rates on the
+remaining number, is forty shillings for every family of five persons,
+which make the whole average amount of taxes and rates L14 17s. 6d. For
+six persons L17 17s. For seven persons L2O 16s. 6d.
+The average of taxes in America, under the new or representative system
+of government, including the interest of the debt contracted in the
+war, and taking the population at four millions of souls, which it now
+amounts to, and it is daily increasing, is five shillings per head,
+men, women, and children. The difference, therefore, between the two
+governments is as under:
+
+ England America
+ L s. d. L s. d.
+ For a family of five persons 14 17 6 1 5 0
+ For a family of six persons 17 17 0 1 10 0
+ For a family of seven persons 20 16 6 1 15 0
+
+[Footnote 36: Public schools do not answer the general purpose of the poor.
+They are chiefly in corporation towns from which the country towns and
+villages are excluded, or, if admitted, the distance occasions a great
+loss of time. Education, to be useful to the poor, should be on the
+spot, and the best method, I believe, to accomplish this is to enable
+the parents to pay the expenses themselves. There are always persons of
+both sexes to be found in every village, especially when growing into
+years, capable of such an undertaking. Twenty children at ten shillings
+each (and that not more than six months each year) would be as much as
+some livings amount to in the remotest parts of England, and there are
+often distressed clergymen's widows to whom such an income would be
+acceptable. Whatever is given on this account to children answers two
+purposes. To them it is education--to those who educate them it is a
+livelihood.]
+
+[Footnote 37: The tax on beer brewed for sale, from which the aristocracy are
+exempt, is almost one million more than the present commutation tax,
+being by the returns of 1788, L1,666,152--and, consequently, they ought
+to take on themselves the amount of the commutation tax, as they are
+already exempted from one which is almost a million greater.]
+
+[Footnote 38: See the Reports on the Corn Trade.]
+
+[Footnote 39: When enquiries are made into the condition of the poor, various
+degrees of distress will most probably be found, to render a different
+arrangement preferable to that which is already proposed. Widows with
+families will be in greater want than where there are husbands living.
+There is also a difference in the expense of living in different
+counties: and more so in fuel.
+
+ Suppose then fifty thousand extraordinary cases, at
+ the rate of ten pounds per family per annum L500,000
+ 100,000 families, at L8 per family per annum 800,000
+ 100,000 families, at L7 per family per annum 700,000
+ 104,000 families, at L5 per family per annum 520,000
+
+ And instead of ten shillings per head for the education
+ of other children, to allow fifty shillings per family
+ for that purpose to fifty thousand families 250,000
+ ----------
+ L2,770,000
+ 140,000 aged persons as before 1,120,000
+ ----------
+ L3,890,000
+
+This arrangement amounts to the same sum as stated in this work, Part
+II, line number 1068, including the L250,000 for education; but it
+provides (including the aged people) for four hundred and four thousand
+families, which is almost one third of an the families in England.]
+
+[Footnote 40: I know it is the opinion of many of the most enlightened characters
+in France (there always will be those who see further into events than
+others), not only among the general mass of citizens, but of many of the
+principal members of the former National Assembly, that the monarchical
+plan will not continue many years in that country. They have found out,
+that as wisdom cannot be made hereditary, power ought not; and that, for
+a man to merit a million sterling a year from a nation, he ought to have
+a mind capable of comprehending from an atom to a universe, which, if he
+had, he would be above receiving the pay. But they wished not to appear
+to lead the nation faster than its own reason and interest dictated. In
+all the conversations where I have been present upon this subject, the
+idea always was, that when such a time, from the general opinion of the
+nation, shall arrive, that the honourable and liberal method would be,
+to make a handsome present in fee simple to the person, whoever he may
+be, that shall then be in the monarchical office, and for him to retire
+to the enjoyment of private life, possessing his share of general rights
+and privileges, and to be no more accountable to the public for his time
+and his conduct than any other citizen.]
+
+[Footnote 41: The gentleman who signed the address and declaration as chairman of
+the meeting, Mr. Horne Tooke, being generally supposed to be the person
+who drew it up, and having spoken much in commendation of it, has
+been jocularly accused of praising his own work. To free him from this
+embarrassment, and to save him the repeated trouble of mentioning the
+author, as he has not failed to do, I make no hesitation in saying,
+that as the opportunity of benefiting by the French Revolution easily
+occurred to me, I drew up the publication in question, and showed it to
+him and some other gentlemen, who, fully approving it, held a meeting
+for the purpose of making it public, and subscribed to the amount of
+fifty guineas to defray the expense of advertising. I believe there
+are at this time, in England, a greater number of men acting on
+disinterested principles, and determined to look into the nature and
+practices of government themselves, and not blindly trust, as
+has hitherto been the case, either to government generally, or to
+parliaments, or to parliamentary opposition, than at any former period.
+Had this been done a century ago, corruption and taxation had not
+arrived to the height they are now at.]
+
+
+ -END OF PART II.-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Writings of Thomas Paine, Volume II, by
+Thomas Paine
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THOMAS PAINE ***
+
+***** This file should be named 3742.txt or 3742.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/4/3742/
+
+Produced by Norman M. Wolcott
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.