diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:21:58 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:21:58 -0700 |
| commit | ca58e3f5a0d26917060a8c6ad0a1679f92560cd7 (patch) | |
| tree | 191d7d2da71458bf6288233b1a9fd876d0bd5037 /3631-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '3631-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 3631-h/3631-h.htm | 2814 |
1 files changed, 2814 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/3631-h/3631-h.htm b/3631-h/3631-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c760e77 --- /dev/null +++ b/3631-h/3631-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,2814 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html + PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> +<head> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" /> +<title>On the Significance of Science and Art</title> + <style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- + P { margin-top: .75em; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + P.headingsummary { margin-left: 5%;} + H1, H2 { + text-align: center; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + } + H3, H4, H5 { + text-align: left; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + } + BODY{margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + } + table { border-collapse: collapse; } + td { vertical-align: top; border: 1px solid black;} + td p { margin: 0.2em; } + .blkquot {margin-left: 4em; margin-right: 4em;} /* block indent */ + + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + + .pagenum {position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; + color: gray;} + + .citation {vertical-align: super; + font-size: .8em; + text-decoration: none;} + // --> + /* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> +</head> +<body> +<h2> +<a href="#startoftext">On the Significance of Science and Art, by Count Lyof N. Tolstoi</a> +</h2> +<pre> +The Project Gutenberg eBook, On the Significance of Science and Art, by +Count Lyof N. Tolstoi, Translated by Isabel F. Hapgood + + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + + + + +Title: On the Significance of Science and Art + from What to Do? + + +Author: Count Lyof N. Tolstoi + + + +Release Date: December 27, 2007 [eBook #3631] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII) + + +***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SCIENCE AND +ART*** +</pre> +<p><a name="startoftext"></a></p> +<p>Transcribed from the 1887 Tomas Y. Crowell “What to +do?” edition by David Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org</p> +<h1>ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SCIENCE AND ART—FROM “WHAT +TO DO?”</h1> +<h2>ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SCIENCE AND ART.</h2> +<h3>CHAPTER I.</h3> +<p>. . . <a name="citation169"></a><a href="#footnote169" +class="citation">[169]</a> The justification of all persons who +have freed themselves from toil is now founded on experimental, +positive science. The scientific theory is as +follows:—</p> +<p>“For the study of the laws of life of human societies, +there exists but one indubitable method,—the positive, +experimental, critical method</p> +<p>“Only sociology, founded on biology, founded on all the +positive sciences, can give us the laws of humanity. +Humanity, or human communities, are the organisms already +prepared, or still in process of formation, and which are +subservient to all the laws of the evolution of organisms.</p> +<p>“One of the chief of these laws is the variation of +destination among the portions of the organs. Some people +command, others obey. If some have in superabundance, and +others in want, this arises not from the will of God, not because +the empire is a form of manifestation of personality, but because +in societies, as in organisms, division of labor becomes +indispensable for life as a whole. Some people perform the +muscular labor in societies; others, the mental labor.”</p> +<p>Upon this doctrine is founded the prevailing justification of +our time.</p> +<p>Not long ago, their reigned in the learned, cultivated world, +a moral philosophy, according to which it appeared that every +thing which exists is reasonable; that there is no such thing as +evil or good; and that it is unnecessary for man to war against +evil, but that it is only necessary for him to display +intelligence,—one man in the military service, another in +the judicial, another on the violin. There have been many +and varied expressions of human wisdom, and these phenomena were +known to the men of the nineteenth century. The wisdom of +Rousseau and of Lessing, and Spinoza and Bruno, and all the +wisdom of antiquity; but no one man’s wisdom overrode the +crowd. It was impossible to say even this,—that +Hegel’s success was the result of the symmetry of this +theory. There were other equally symmetrical +theories,—those of Descartes, Leibnitz, Fichte, +Schopenhauer. There was but one reason why this doctrine +won for itself, for a season, the belief of the whole world; and +this reason was, that the deductions of that philosophy winked at +people’s weaknesses. These deductions were summed up +in this,—that every thing was reasonable, every thing good; +and that no one was to blame.</p> +<p>When I began my career, Hegelianism was the foundation of +every thing. It was floating in the air; it was expressed +in newspaper and periodical articles, in historical and judicial +lectures, in novels, in treatises, in art, in sermons, in +conversation. The man who was not acquainted with Hegal had +no right to speak. Any one who desired to understand the +truth studied Hegel. Every thing rested on him. And +all at once the forties passed, and there was nothing left of +him. There was not even a hint of him, any more than if he +had never existed. And the most amazing thing of all was, +that Hegelianism did not fall because some one overthrew it or +destroyed it. No! It was the same then as now, but +all at once it appeared that it was of no use whatever to the +learned and cultivated world.</p> +<p>There was a time when the Hegelian wise men triumphantly +instructed the masses; and the crowd, understanding nothing, +blindly believed in every thing, finding confirmation in the fact +that it was on hand; and they believed that what seemed to them +muddy and contradictory there on the heights of philosophy was +all as clear as the day. But that time has gone by. +That theory is worn out: a new theory has presented itself in its +stead. The old one has become useless; and the crowd has +looked into the secret sanctuaries of the high priests, and has +seen that there is nothing there, and that there has been nothing +there, save very obscure and senseless words. This has +taken place within my memory.</p> +<p>“But this arises,” people of the present science +will say, “from the fact that all that was the raving of +the theological and metaphysical period; but now there exists +positive, critical science, which does not deceive, since it is +all founded on induction and experiment. Now our erections +are not shaky, as they formerly were, and only in our path lies +the solution of all the problems of humanity.”</p> +<p>But the old teachers said precisely the same, and they were no +fools; and we know that there were people of great intelligence +among them. And precisely thus, within my memory, and with +no less confidence, with no less recognition on the part of the +crowd of so-called cultivated people, spoke the Hegelians. +And neither were our Herzens, our Stankevitches, or our +Byelinskys fools. But whence arose that marvellous +manifestation, that sensible people should preach with the +greatest assurance, and that the crowd should accept with +devotion, such unfounded and unsupportable teachings? There +is but one reason,—that the teachings thus inculcated +justified people in their evil life.</p> +<p>A very poor English writer, whose works are all forgotten, and +recognized as the most insignificant of the insignificant, writes +a treatise on population, in which he devises a fictitious law +concerning the increase of population disproportionate to the +means of subsistence. This fictitious law, this writer +encompasses with mathematical formulæ founded on nothing +whatever; and then he launches it on the world. From the +frivolity and the stupidity of this hypothesis, one would suppose +that it would not attract the attention of any one, and that it +would sink into oblivion, like all the works of the same author +which followed it; but it turned out quite otherwise. The +hack-writer who penned this treatise instantly becomes a +scientific authority, and maintains himself upon that height for +nearly half a century. Malthus! The Malthusian +theory,—the law of the increase of the population in +geometrical, and of the means of subsistence in arithmetical +proportion, and the wise and natural means of restricting the +population,—all these have become scientific, indubitable +truths, which have not been confirmed, but which have been +employed as axioms, for the erection of false theories. In +this manner have learned and cultivated people proceeded; and +among the herd of idle persons, there sprung up a pious trust in +the great laws expounded by Malthus. How did this come to +pass? It would seem as though they were scientific +deductions, which had nothing in common with the instincts of the +masses. But this can only appear so for the man who +believes that science, like the Church, is something +self-contained, liable to no errors, and not simply the +imaginings of weak and erring folk, who merely substitute the +imposing word “science,” in place of the thoughts and +words of the people, for the sake of impressiveness.</p> +<p>All that was necessary was to make practical deductions from +the theory of Malthus, in order to perceive that this theory was +of the most human sort, with the best defined of objects. +The deductions directly arising from this theory were the +following: The wretched condition of the laboring classes was +such in accordance with an unalterable law, which does not depend +upon men; and, if any one is to blame in this matter, it is the +hungry laboring classes themselves. Why are they such fools +as to give birth to children, when they know that there will be +nothing for the children to eat? And so this deduction, +which is valuable for the herd of idle people, has had this +result: that all learned men overlooked the incorrectness, the +utter arbitrariness of these deductions, and their +insusceptibility to proof; and the throng of cultivated, i.e., of +idle people, knowing instinctively to what these deductions lead, +saluted this theory with enthusiasm, conferred upon it the stamp +of truth, i.e., of science, and dragged it about with them for +half a century.</p> +<p>Is not this same thing the cause of the confidence of men in +positive critical-experimental science, and of the devout +attitude of the crowd towards that which it preaches? At +first it seems strange, that the theory of evolution can in any +manner justify people in their evil ways; and it seems as though +the scientific theory of evolution has to deal only with facts, +and that it does nothing else but observe facts.</p> +<p>But this only appears to be the case.</p> +<p>Exactly the same thing appeared to be the case with the +Hegelian doctrine, in a greater degree, and also in the special +instance of the Malthusian doctrine. Hegelianism was, +apparently, occupied only with its logical constructions, and +bore no relation to the life of mankind. Precisely this +seemed to be the case with the Malthusian theory. It +appeared to be busy itself only with statistical data. But +this was only in appearance.</p> +<p>Contemporary science is also occupied with facts alone: it +investigates facts. But what facts? Why precisely +these facts, and no others?</p> +<p>The men of contemporary science are very fond of saying, +triumphantly and confidently, “We investigate only +facts,” imagining that these words contain some +meaning. It is impossible to investigate facts alone, +because the facts which are subject to our investigation are +<i>innumerable</i> (in the definite sense of that +word),—innumerable. Before we proceed to investigate +facts, we must have a theory on the foundation of which these or +those facts can be inquired into, i.e., selected from the +incalculable quantity.</p> +<p>And this theory exists, and is even very definitely expressed, +although many of the workers in contemporary science do not know +it, or often pretend that they do not know it. Exactly thus +has it always been with all prevailing and guiding +doctrines. The foundations of every doctrine are always +stated in a theory, and the so-called learned men merely invent +further deductions from the foundations once stated. Thus +contemporary science is selecting its facts on the foundation of +a very definite theory, which it sometimes knows, sometimes +refuses to know, and sometimes really does not know; but the +theory exists.</p> +<p>The theory is as follows: All mankind is an undying organism; +men are the particles of that organism, and each one of them has +his own special task for the service of others. In the same +manner, the cells united in an organism share among them the +labor of fight for existence of the whole organism; they magnify +the power of one capacity, and weaken another, and unite in one +organ, in order the better to supply the requirements of the +whole organism. And exactly in the same manner as with +gregarious animals,—ants or bees,—the separate +individuals divide the labor among them. The queen lays the +egg, the drone fructifies it; the bee works his whole life +long. And precisely this thing takes place in mankind and +in human societies. And therefore, in order to find the law +of life for man, it is necessary to study the laws of the life +and the development of organisms.</p> +<p>In the life and development of organisms, we find the +following laws: the law of differentiation and integration, the +law that every phenomenon is accompanied not by direct +consequences alone, another law regarding the instability of +type, and so on. All this seems very innocent; but it is +only necessary to draw the deductions from all these laws, in +order to immediately perceive that these laws incline in the same +direction as the law of Malthus. These laws all point to +one thing; namely, to the recognition of that division of labor +which exists in human communities, as organic, that is to say, as +indispensable. And therefore, the unjust position in which +we, the people who have freed ourselves from labor, find +ourselves, must be regarded not from the point of view of +common-sense and justice, but merely as an undoubted fact, +confirming the universal law.</p> +<p>Moral philosophy also justified every sort of cruelty and +harshness; but this resulted in a philosophical manner, and +therefore wrongly. But with science, all this results +scientifically, and therefore in a manner not to be doubted.</p> +<p>How can we fail to accept so very beautiful a theory? It +is merely necessary to look upon human society as an object of +contemplation; and I can console myself with the thought that my +activity, whatever may be its nature, is a functional activity of +the organism of humanity, and that therefore there cannot arise +any question as to whether it is just that I, in employing the +labor of others, am doing only that which is agreeable to me, as +there can arise no question as to the division of labor between +the brain cells and the muscular cells. How is it possible +not to admit so very beautiful a theory, in order that one may be +able, ever after, to pocket one’s conscience, and have a +perfectly unbridled animal existence, feeling beneath one’s +self that support of science which is not to be shaken +nowadays!</p> +<p>And it is on this new doctrine that the justification for +men’s idleness and cruelty is now founded.</p> +<h3>CHAPTER II.</h3> +<p>This doctrine had its rise not so very long—fifty +years—ago. Its principal founder was the French +<i>savant</i> Comte. There occurred to Comte,—a +systematist, and a religious man to boot,—under the +influence of the then novel physiological investigations of +Biche, the old idea already set forth by Menenius +Agrippa,—the idea that human society, all humanity even, +might be regarded as one whole, as an organism; and men as living +parts of the separate organs, having each his own definite +appointment to serve the entire organism.</p> +<p>This idea so pleased Comte, that upon it he began to erect a +philosophical theory; and this theory so carried him away, that +he utterly forgot that the point of departure for his theory was +nothing more than a very pretty comparison, which was suitable +for a fable, but which could by no means serve as the foundation +for science. He, as frequently happens, mistook his pet +hypothesis for an axiom, and imagined that his whole theory was +erected on the very firmest of foundations. According to +his theory, it seemed that since humanity is an organism, the +knowledge of what man is, and of what should be his relations to +the world, was possible only through a knowledge of the features +of this organism. For the knowledge of these qualities, man +is enabled to take observations on other and lower organisms, and +to draw conclusions from their life. Therefore, in the fist +place, the true and only method, according to Comte, is the +inductive, and all science is only such when it has experiment as +its basis; in the second place, the goal and crown of sciences is +formed by that new science dealing with the imaginary organism of +humanity, or the super-organic being,—humanity,—and +this newly devised science is sociology.</p> +<p>And from this view of science it appears, that all previous +knowledge was deceitful, and that the whole story of humanity, in +the sense of self-knowledge, has been divided into three, +actually into two, periods: the theological and metaphysical +period, extending from the beginning of the world to Comte, and +the present period,—that of the only true science, positive +science,—beginning with Comte.</p> +<p>All this was very well. There was but one error, and +that was this,—that the whole edifice was erected on the +sand, on the arbitrary and false assertion that humanity is an +organism. This assertion was arbitrary, because we have +just as much right to admit the existence of a human organism, +not subject to observation, as we have to admit the existence of +any other invisible, fantastic being. This assertion was +erroneous, because for the understanding of humanity, i.e., of +men, the definition of an organism was incorrectly constructed, +while in humanity itself all actual signs of organism,—the +centre of feeling or consciousness, are lacking. <a +name="citation178"></a><a href="#footnote178" +class="citation">[178]</a></p> +<p>But, in spite of the arbitrariness and incorrectness of the +fundamental assumption of positive philosophy, it was accepted by +the so-called cultivated world with the greatest sympathy. +In this connection, one thing is worthy of note: that out of the +works of Comte, consisting of two parts, of positive philosophy +and of positive politics, only the first was adopted by the +learned world,—that part which justifieth, on new promises, +the existent evil of human societies; but the second part, +treating of the moral obligations of altruism, arising from the +recognition of mankind as an organism, was regarded as not only +of no importance, but as trivial and unscientific. It was a +repetition of the same thing that had happened in the case of +Kant’s works. The “Critique of Pure +Reason” was adopted by the scientific crowd; but the +“Critique of Applied Reason,” that part which +contains the gist of moral doctrine, was repudiated. In +Kant’s doctrine, that was accepted as scientific which +subserved the existent evil. But the positive philosophy, +which was accepted by the crowd, was founded on an arbitrary and +erroneous basis, was in itself too unfounded, and therefore +unsteady, and could not support itself alone. And so, amid +all the multitude of the idle plays of thought of the men +professing the so-called science, there presents itself an +assertion equally devoid of novelty, and equally arbitrary and +erroneous, to the effect that living beings, i.e., organisms, +have had their rise in each other,—not only one organism +from another, but one from many; i.e., that in a very long +interval of time (in a million of years, for instance), not only +could a duck and a fish proceed from one ancestor, but that one +animal might result from a whole hive of bees. And this +arbitrary and erroneous assumption was accepted by the learned +world with still greater and more universal sympathy. This +assumption was arbitrary, because no one has ever seen how one +organism is made from another, and therefore the hypothesis as to +the origin of species will always remain an hypothesis, and not +an experimental fact. And this hypothesis was also +erroneous, because the decision of the question as to the origin +of species—that they have originated, in consequence of the +law of heredity and fitness, in the course of an interminably +long time—is no solution at all, but merely a re-statement +of the problem in a new form.</p> +<p>According to Moses’ solution of the question (in the +dispute with whom the entire significance of this theory lies), +it appears that the diversity of the species of living creatures +proceeded according to the will of God, and according to His +almighty power; but according to the theory of evolution, it +appears that the difference between living creatures arose by +chance, and on account of varying conditions of heredity and +surroundings, through an endless period of time. The theory +of evolution, to speak in simple language, merely asserts, that +by chance, in an incalculably long period of time, out of any +thing you like, any thing else that you like may develop.</p> +<p>This is no answer to the problem. And the same problem +is differently expressed: instead of will, chance is offered, and +the co-efficient of the eternal is transposed from the power to +the time. But this fresh assertion strengthened +Comte’s assertion. And, moreover, according to the +ingenuous confession of the founder of Darwin’s theory +himself, his idea was aroused in him by the law of Malthus; and +he therefore propounded the theory of the struggle of living +creatures and people for existence, as the fundamental law of +every living thing. And lo! only this was needed by the +throng of idle people for their justification.</p> +<p>Two insecure theories, incapable of sustaining themselves on +their feet, upheld each other, and acquired the semblance of +stability. Both theories bore with them that idea which is +precious to the crowd, that in the existent evil of human +societies, men are not to blame, and that the existing order of +things is that which should prevail; and the new theory was +adopted by the throng with entire faith and unheard-of +enthusiasm. And behold, on the strength of these two +arbitrary and erroneous hypotheses, accepted as dogmas of belief, +the new scientific doctrine was ratified.</p> +<p>Spencer, for example, in one of his first works, expresses +this doctrine thus:—</p> +<p>“Societies and organisms,” he says, “are +alike in the following points:—</p> +<p>“1. In that, beginning as tiny aggregates, they +imperceptibly grow in mass, so that some of them attain to the +size of ten thousand times their original bulk.</p> +<p>“2. In that while they were, in the beginning, of +such simple structure, that they can be regarded as destitute of +all structure, they acquire during the period of their growth a +constantly increasing complication of structure.</p> +<p>“3. In that although in their early, undeveloped +period, there exists between them hardly any interdependence of +parts, their parts gradually acquire an interdependence, which +eventually becomes so strong, that the life and activity of each +part becomes possible only on condition of the life and activity +of the remaining parts.</p> +<p>“4. In that life and the development of society +are independent, and more protracted than the life and +development of any one of the units constituting it, which are +born, grow, act, reproduce themselves, and die separately; while +the political body formed from them, continues to live generation +after generation, developing in mass in perfection and functional +activity.”</p> +<p>The points of difference between organisms and society go +farther; and it is proved that these differences are merely +apparent, but that organisms and societies are absolutely +similar.</p> +<p>For the uninitiated man the question immediately presents +itself: “What are you talking about? Why is mankind +an organism, or similar to an organism?”</p> +<p>You say that societies resemble organisms in these four +features; but it is nothing of the sort. You only take a +few features of the organism, and beneath them you range human +communities. You bring forward four features of +resemblance, then you take four features of dissimilarity, which +are, however, only apparent (according to you); and you thence +conclude that human societies can be regarded as organisms. +But surely, this is an empty game of dialectics, and nothing +more. On the same foundation, under the features of an +organism, you may range whatever you please. I will take +the fist thing that comes into my head. Let us suppose it +to be a forest,—the manner in which it sows itself in the +plain, and spreads abroad. 1. Beginning with a small +aggregate, it increases imperceptibly in mass, and so +forth. Exactly the same thing takes place in the fields, +when they gradually seed themselves down, and bring forth a +forest. 2. In the beginning the structure is simple: +afterwards it increases in complication, and so forth. +Exactly the same thing happens with the forest,—in the +first place, there were only bitch-trees, then came brush-wood +and hazel-bushes; at first all grow erect, then they interlace +their branches. 3. The interdependence of the parts is so +augmented, that the life of each part depends on the life and +activity of the remaining parts. It is precisely so with +the forest,—the hazel-bush warms the tree-boles (cut it +down, and the other trees will freeze), the hazel-bush protects +from the wind, the seed-bearing trees carry on reproduction, the +tall and leafy trees afford shade, and the life of one tree +depends on the life of another. 4. The separate parts may +die, but the whole lives. Exactly the case with the +forest. The forest does not mourn one tree.</p> +<p>Having proved that, in accordance with this theory, you may +regard the forest as an organism, you fancy that you have proved +to the disciples of the organic doctrine the error of their +definition. Nothing of the sort. The definition which +they give to the organism is so inaccurate and so elastic that +under this definition they may include what they will. +“Yes,” they say; “and the forest may also be +regarded as an organism. The forest is mutual re-action of +individuals, which do not annihilate each other,—an +aggregate; its parts may also enter into a more intimate union, +as the hive of bees constitutes itself an organism.” +Then you will say, “If that is so, then the birds and the +insects and the grass of this forest, which re-act upon each +other, and do not destroy each other, may also be regarded as one +organism, in company with the trees.” And to this +also they will agree. Every collection of living +individuals, which re-act upon each other, and do not destroy +each other, may be regarded as organisms, according to their +theory. You may affirm a connection and interaction between +whatever you choose, and, according to evolution, you may affirm, +that, out of whatever you please, any other thing that you please +may proceed, in a very long period of time.</p> +<p>And the most remarkable thing of all is, that this same +identical positive science recognizes the scientific method as +the sign of true knowledge, and has itself defined what it +designates as the scientific method.</p> +<p>By the scientific method it means common-sense.</p> +<p>And common-sense convicts it at every step. As soon as +the Popes felt that nothing holy remained in them, they called +themselves most holy.</p> +<p>As soon as science felt that no common-sense was left in her +she called herself sensible, that is to say, scientific +science.</p> +<h3>CHAPTER III.</h3> +<p>Division of labor is the law of all existing things, and, +therefore, it should be present in human societies. It is +very possible that this is so; but still the question remains, Of +what nature is that division of labor which I behold in my human +society? is it that division of labor which should exist? +And if people regard a certain division of labor as unreasonable +and unjust, then no science whatever can convince men that that +should exist which they regard as unreasonable and unjust.</p> +<p>Division of labor is the condition of existence of organisms, +and of human societies; but what, in these human societies, is to +be regarded as an organic division of labor? And, to +whatever extent science may have investigated the division of +labor in the cells of worms, all these observations do not compel +a man to acknowledge that division of labor to be correct which +his own sense and conscience do not recognize as correct. +No matter how convincing may be the proofs of the division of +labor of the cells in the organisms studied, man, if he has not +parted with his judgment, will say, nevertheless, that a man +should not weave calico all his life, and that this is not +division of labor, but persecution of the people. Spencer +and others say that there is a whole community of weavers, and +that the profession of weaving is an organic division of +labor. There are weavers; so, of course, there is such a +division of labor. It would be well enough to speak thus if +the colony of weavers had arisen by the free will of its +member’s; but we know that it is not thus formed of their +initiative, but that we make it. Hence it is necessary to +find out whether we have made these weavers in accordance with an +organic law, or with some other.</p> +<p>Men live. They support themselves by agriculture, as is +natural to all men. One man has set up a blacksmith’s +forge, and repaired his plough; his neighbor comes to him, and +asks him to mend his also, and promises him in return either work +or money. A third comes, and a fourth; and in the community +formed by these men, there arises the following division of +labor,—a blacksmith is created. Another man has +instructed his children well; his neighbor brings his children to +him, and requests him to teach them also, and a teacher is +created. But both blacksmith and teacher have been created, +and continue to be such, merely because they have been asked; and +they remain such as long as they are requested to be blacksmith +and teacher. If it should come to pass that many +blacksmiths and teachers should set themselves up, or that their +work is not requited, they will immediately, as common-sense +demands and as always happens when there is no occasion for +disturbing the regular course of division of labor,—they +will immediately abandon their trade, and betake themselves once +more to agriculture.</p> +<p>Men who behave thus are guided by their sense, their +conscience; and hence we, the men endowed with sense and +conscience, all assert that such a division of labor is +right. But if it should chance that the blacksmiths were +able to compel other people to work for them, and should continue +to make horse-shoes when they were not wanted, and if the +teachers should go on teaching when there was no one to teach, +then it is obvious to every sane man, as a man, i.e., as a being +endowed with reason and conscience, that this would not be +division, but appropriation, of labor. And yet precisely +that sort of activity is what is called division of labor by +scientific science. People do that which others do not +think of requiring, and demand that they shall be supported for +so doing, and say that this is just because it is division of +labor.</p> +<p>That which constitutes the cause of the economical poverty of +our age is what the English call over-production (which means +that a mass of things are made which are of no use to anybody, +and with which nothing can be done).</p> +<p>It would be odd to see a shoemaker, who should consider that +people were bound to feed him because he incessantly made boots +which had been of no use to any one for a long time; but what +shall we say of those men who make nothing,—who not only +produce nothing that is visible, but nothing that is of use for +people at large,—for whose wares there are no customers, +and who yet demand, with the same boldness, on the ground of +division of labor, that they shall be supplied with fine food and +drink, and that they shall be dressed well? There may be, +and there are, sorcerers for whose services a demand makes itself +felt, and for this purpose there are brought to them pancakes and +flasks; but it is difficult to imagine the existence of sorcerers +whose spells are useless to every one, and who boldly demand that +they shall be luxuriously supported because they exercise +sorcery. And it is the same in our world. And all +this comes about on the basis of that false conception of the +division of labor, which is defined not by reason and conscience, +but by observation, which men of science avow with such +unanimity.</p> +<p>Division of labor has, in reality, always existed, and still +exists; but it is right only when man decides with his reason and +his conscience that it should be so, and not when he merely +investigates it. And reason and conscience decide the +question for all men very simply, unanimously, and in a manner +not to be doubted. They always decide it thus: that +division of labor is right only when a special branch of +man’s activity is so needful to men, that they, entreating +him to serve them, voluntarily propose to support him in requital +for that which he shall do for them. But, when a man can +live from infancy to the age of thirty years on the necks of +others, promising to do, when he shall have been taught, +something extremely useful, for which no one asks him; and when, +from the age of thirty until his death, he can live in the same +manner, still merely on the promise to do something, for which +there has been no request, this will not be division of labor +(and, as a matter of fact, there is no such thing in our +society), but it will be what it already is,—merely the +appropriation, by force, of the toil of others; that same +appropriation by force of the toil of others which the +philosophers formerly designated by various names,—for +instance, as indispensable forms of life,—but which +scientific science now calls the organic division of labor.</p> +<p>The whole significance of scientific science lies in this +alone. It has now become a distributer of diplomas for +idleness; for it alone, in its sanctuaries, selects and +determines what is parasitical, and what is organic activity, in +the social organism. Just as though every man could not +find this out for himself much more accurately and more speedily, +by taking counsel of his reason and his conscience. It +seems to men of scientific science, that there can be no doubt of +this, and that their activity is also indubitably organic; they, +the scientific and artistic workers, are the brain cells, and the +most precious cells in the whole organism.</p> +<p>Ever since men—reasoning beings—have existed, they +have distinguished good from evil, and have profited by the fact +that men have made this distinction before them; they have warred +against evil, and have sought the good, and have slowly but +uninterruptedly advanced in that path. And divers delusions +have always stood before men, hemming in this path, and having +for their object to demonstrate to them, that it was not +necessary to do this, and that it was not necessary to live as +they were living. With fearful conflict and difficulty, men +have freed themselves from many delusions. And behold, a +new and a still more evil delusion has sprung up in the path of +mankind,—the scientific delusion.</p> +<p>This new delusion is precisely the same in nature as the old +ones; its gist lies in secretly leading astray the activity of +our reason and conscience, and of those who have lived before us, +by something external. In scientific science, this external +thing is—investigation.</p> +<p>The cunning of this science consists in this,—that, +after pointing out to men the coarsest false interpretations of +the activity of the reason and conscience of man, it destroys in +them faith in their own reason and conscience, and assures them +that every thing which their reason and conscience say to them, +that all that these have said to the loftiest representatives of +man heretofore, ever since the world has existed,—that all +this is conventional and subjective. “All this must +be abandoned,” they say; “it is impossible to +understand the truth by the reason, for we may be mistaken. +But there exists another unerring and almost mechanical path: it +is necessary to investigate facts.”</p> +<p>But facts must be investigated on the foundation of scientific +science, i.e., of the two hypotheses of positivism and evolution, +which are not borne out by any thing, and which give themselves +out as undoubted truths. And the reigning science +announces, with delusive solemnity, that the solution of all +problems of life is possible only through the study of facts, of +nature, and, in particular, of organisms. The credulous +mass of young people, overwhelmed by the novelty of this +authority, which has not yet been overthrown or even touched by +criticism, flings itself into the study of natural sciences, into +that sole path, which, according to the assertion of the reigning +science, can lead to the elucidation of the problems of life.</p> +<p>But the farther the disciples proceed in this study, the +farther and farther does not only the possibility, but even the +very idea, of the solution of the problems of life withdraw from +them, and the more and more do they become accustomed, not so +much to investigate, as to believe in the assertions of other +investigators (to believe in cells, in protoplasm, in the fourth +condition of bodies, and so forth); the more and more does the +form veil the contents from them; the more and more do they lose +the consciousness of good and evil, and the capacity of +understanding those expressions and definitions of good and evil +which have been elaborated through the whole foregoing life of +mankind; and the more and more do they appropriate to themselves +the special scientific jargon of conventional expressions, which +possesses no universally human significance; and the deeper and +deeper do they plunge into the <i>débris</i> of utterly +unilluminated investigations; the more and more do they lose the +power, not only of independent thought, but even of understanding +the fresh human thought of others, which lies beyond the bounds +of their Talmud. But the principal thing is, that they pass +their best years in getting disused to life; they grow accustomed +to consider their position as justifiable; and they convert +themselves physically into utterly useless parasites, and +mentally they dislocate their brains and become mental +eunuchs. And in precisely the same manner, according to the +measure of their folly, do they acquire self-conceit, which +deprives them forever of all possibility of return to a simple +life of toil, to a simple, clear, and universally human train of +reasoning.</p> +<p>Division of labor always has existed in human communities, and +will probably always exist; but the question for us lies not in +the fact that it has existed, and that it will exist, but in +this,—how are we to govern ourselves so that this division +shall be right? But if we take investigation as our rule of +action, we by this very act repudiate all rule; then in that case +we shall regard as right every division of labor which we shall +descry among men, and which appears to us to be right—to +which conclusion the prevailing scientific science also +leads.</p> +<p>Division of labor!</p> +<p>Some are busied in mental or moral, others in muscular or +physical, labor. With what confidence people enunciate +this! They wish to think so, and it seems to them that, in +point of fact, a perfectly regular exchange of services does take +place.</p> +<p>But we, in our blindness, have so completely lost sight of the +responsibility which we have assumed, that we have even forgotten +in whose name our labor is prosecuted; and the very people whom +we have undertaken to serve have become the objects of our +scientific and artistic activity. We study and depict them +for our amusement and diversion. We have totally forgotten +that what we need to do is not to study and depict them, but to +serve them. To such a degree have we lost sight of this +duty which we have taken upon us, that we have not even noticed +that what we have undertaken to perform in the realm of science +and art has been accomplished not by us, but by others, and that +our place has turned out to be occupied.</p> +<p>It proves that while we have been disputing, one about the +spontaneous origin of organisms, another as to what else there is +in protoplasm, and so on, the common people have been in need of +spiritual food; and the unsuccessful and rejected of art and +science, in obedience to the mandate of adventurers who have in +view the sole aim of profit, have begun to furnish the people +with this spiritual food, and still so furnish them. For +the last forty years in Europe, and for the last ten years with +us here in Russia, millions of books and pictures and song-books +have been distributed, and stalls have been opened, and the +people gaze and sing and receive spiritual nourishment, but not +from us who have undertaken to provide it; while we, justifying +our idleness by that spiritual food which we are supposed to +furnish, sit by and wink at it.</p> +<p>But it is impossible for us to wink at it, for our last +justification is slipping from beneath our feet. We have +become specialized. We have our particular functional +activity. We are the brains of the people. They +support us, and we have undertaken to teach them. It is +only under this pretence that we have excused ourselves from +work. But what have we taught them, and what are we now +teaching them? They have waited for years—for tens, +for hundreds of years. And we keep on diverting our minds +with chatter, and we instruct each other, and we console +ourselves, and we have utterly forgotten them. We have so +entirely forgotten them, that others have undertaken to instruct +them, and we have not even perceived it. We have spoken of +the division of labor with such lack of seriousness, that it is +obvious that what we have said about the benefits which we have +conferred on the people was simply a shameless evasion.</p> +<h3>CHAPTER IV.</h3> +<p>Science and art have arrogated to themselves the right of +idleness, and of the enjoyment of the labor of others, and have +betrayed their calling. And their errors have arisen merely +because their servants, having set forth a falsely conceived +principle of the division of labor, have recognized their own +right to make use of the labor of others, and have lost the +significance of their vocation; having taken for their aim, not +the profit of the people, but the mysterious profit of science +and art, and delivered themselves over to idleness and +vice—not so much of the senses as of the mind.</p> +<p>They say, “Science and art have bestowed a great deal on +mankind.”</p> +<p>Science and art have bestowed a great deal on mankind, not +because the men of art and science, under the pretext of a +division of labor, live on other people, but in spite of +this.</p> +<p>The Roman Republic was powerful, not because her citizens had +the power to live a vicious life, but because among their number +there were heroic citizens. It is the same with art and +science. Art and science have bestowed much on mankind, but +not because their followers formerly possessed on rare occasions +(and now possess on every occasion) the possibility of getting +rid of labor; but because there have been men of genius, who, +without making use of these rights, have led mankind forward.</p> +<p>The class of learned men and artists, which has advanced, on +the fictitious basis of a division of labor, its demands to the +right of using the labors of others, cannot co-operate in the +success of true science and true art, because a lie cannot bring +forth the truth.</p> +<p>We have become so accustomed to these, our tenderly reared or +weakened representatives of mental labor, that it seems to us +horrible that a man of science or an artist should plough or cart +manure. It seems to us that every thing would go to +destruction, and that all his wisdom would be rattled out of him +in the cart, and that all those grand picturesque images which he +bears about in his breast would be soiled in the manure; but we +have become so inured to this, that it does not strike us as +strange that our servitor of science—that is to say, the +servant and teacher of the truth—by making other people do +for him that which he might do for himself, passes half his time +in dainty eating, in smoking, in talking, in free and easy +gossip, in reading the newspapers and romances, and in visiting +the theatres. It is not strange to us to see our +philosopher in the tavern, in the theatre, and at the ball. +It is not strange in our eyes to learn that those artists who +sweeten and ennoble our souls have passed their lives in +drunkenness, cards, and women, if not in something worse.</p> +<p>Art and science are very beautiful things; but just because +they are so beautiful they should not be spoiled by the +compulsory combination with them of vice: that is to say, a man +should not get rid of his obligation to serve his own life and +that of other people by his own labor. Art and science have +caused mankind to progress. Yes; but not because men of art +and science, under the guise of division of labor, have rid +themselves of the very first and most indisputable of human +obligations,—to labor with their hands in the universal +struggle of mankind with nature.</p> +<p>“But only the division of labor, the freedom of men of +science and of art from the necessity of earning them living, has +rendered possible that remarkable success of science which we +behold in our day,” is the answer to this. “If +all were forced to till the soil, those <i>vast</i> results would +not have been attained which have been attained in our day; there +would have been none of those <i>striking</i> successes which +have so greatly augmented man’s power over nature, were it +not for these astronomical discoveries <i>which are so astounding +to the mind of man</i>, and which have added to the security of +navigation; there would be no steamers, no railways, none of +those <i>wonderful</i> bridges, tunnels, steam-engines and +telegraphs, photography, telephones, sewing-machines, +phonographs, electricity, telescopes, spectroscopes, microscopes, +chloroform, Lister’s bandages, and carbolic +acid.”</p> +<p>I will not enumerate every thing on which our age thus prides +itself. This enumeration and pride of enthusiasm over +ourselves and our exploits can be found in almost any newspaper +and popular pamphlet. This enthusiasm over ourselves is +often repeated to such a degree that none of us can sufficiently +rejoice over ourselves, that we are seriously convinced that art +and science have never made such progress as in our own +time. And, as we are indebted for all this marvellous +progress to the division of labor, why not acknowledge it?</p> +<p>Let us admit that the progress made in our day is noteworthy, +marvellous, unusual; let us admit that we are fortunate mortals +to live in such a remarkable epoch: but let us endeavor to +appraise this progress, not on the basis of our +self-satisfaction, but of that principle which defends itself +with this progress,—the division of labor. All this +progress is very amazing; but by a peculiarly unlucky chance, +admitted even by the men of science, this progress has not so far +improved, but it has rather rendered worse, the position of the +majority, that is to say, of the workingman.</p> +<p>If the workingman can travel on the railway, instead of +walking, still that same railway has burned down his forest, has +carried off his grain under his very nose, and has brought his +condition very near to slavery—to the capitalist. If, +thanks to steam-engines and machines, the workingman can purchase +inferior calico at a cheap rate, on the other hand these engines +and machines have deprived him of work at home, and have brought +him into a state of abject slavery to the manufacturer. If +there are telephones and telescopes, poems, romances, theatres, +ballets, symphonies, operas, picture-galleries, and so forth, on +the other hand the life of the workingman has not been bettered +by all this; for all of them, by the same unlucky chance, are +inaccessible to him.</p> +<p>So that, on the whole (and even men of science admit this), up +to the present time, all these remarkable discoveries and +products of science and art have certainly not ameliorated the +condition of the workingman, if, indeed, they have not made it +worse. So that, if we set against the question as to the +reality of the progress attained by the arts and sciences, not +our own rapture, but that standard upon the basis of which the +division of labor is defended,—the good of the laboring +man,—we shall see that we have no firm foundations for that +self-satisfaction in which we are so fond of indulging.</p> +<p>The peasant travels on the railway, the woman buys calico, in +the <i>isbá</i> (cottage) there will be a lamp instead of +a pine-knot, and the peasant will light his pipe with a +match,—this is convenient; but what right have I to say +that the railway and the factory have proved advantageous to the +people?</p> +<p>If the peasant rides on the railway, and buys calico, a lamp, +and matches, it is only because it is impossible to forbid the +peasant’s buying them; but surely we are all aware that the +construction of railways and factories has never been carried out +for the benefit of the lower classes: so why should a casual +convenience which the workingman enjoys lead to a proof of the +utility of all these institutions for the people?</p> +<p>There is something useful in every injurious thing. +After a conflagration, one can warm one’s self, and light +one’s pipe with a firebrand; but why declare that the +conflagration is beneficial?</p> +<p>Men of art and science might say that their pursuits are +beneficial to the people, only when men of art and science have +assigned to themselves the object of serving the people, as they +now assign themselves the object of serving the authorities and +the capitalists. We might say this if men of art and +science had taken as their aim the needs of the people; but there +are none such. All scientists are busy with their priestly +avocations, out of which proceed investigations into protoplasm, +the spectral analyses of stars, and so on. But science has +never once thought of what axe or what hatchet is the most +profitable to chop with, what saw is the most handy, what is the +best way to mix bread, from what flour, how to set it, how to +build and heat an oven, what food and drink, and what utensils, +are the most convenient and advantageous under certain +conditions, what mushrooms may be eaten, how to propagate them, +and how to prepare them in the most suitable manner. And +yet all this is the province of science.</p> +<p>I am aware, that, according to its own definition, science +ought to be useless, i.e., science for the sake of science; but +surely this is an obvious evasion. The province of science +is to serve the people. We have invented telegraphs, +telephones, phonographs; but what advances have we effected in +the life, in the labor, of the people? We have reckoned up +two millions of beetles! And we have not tamed a single +animal since biblical times, when all our animals were already +domesticated; but the reindeer, the stag, the partridge, the +heath-cock, all remain wild.</p> +<p>Our botanists have discovered the cell, and in the cell +protoplasm, and in that protoplasm still something more, and in +that atom yet another thing. It is evident that these +occupations will not end for a long time to come, because it is +obvious that there can be no end to them, and therefore the +scientist has no time to devote to those things which are +necessary to the people. And therefore, again, from the +time of Egyptian and Hebrew antiquity, when wheat and lentils had +already been cultivated, down to our own times, not a single +plant has been added to the food of the people, with the +exception of the potato, and that was not obtained by +science.</p> +<p>Torpedoes have been invented, and apparatus for taxation, and +so forth. But the spinning-whined, the woman’s +weaving-loom, the plough, the hatchet, the chain, the rake, the +bucket, the well-sweep, are exactly the same as they were in the +days of Rurik; and if there has been any change, then that change +has not been effected by scientific people.</p> +<p>And it is the same with the arts. We have elevated a lot +of people to the rank of great writers; we have picked these +writers to pieces, and have written mountains of criticism, and +criticism on the critics, and criticism on the critics of the +critics. And we have collected picture-galleries, and have +studied different schools of art in detail; and we have so many +symphonies and orchestras and operas, that it is becoming +difficult even for us to listen to them. But what have we +added to the popular <i>bylini</i> [the epic songs], legends, +tales, songs? What music, what pictures, have we given to +the people?</p> +<p>On the Nikolskaya books are manufactured for the people, and +harmonicas in Tula; and in neither have we taken any part. +The falsity of the whole direction of our arts and sciences is +more striking and more apparent in precisely those very branches, +which, it would seem, should, from their very nature, be of use +to the people, and which, in consequence of their false attitude, +seem rather injurious than useful. The technologist, the +physician, the teacher, the artist, the author, should, in virtue +of their very callings, it would seem, serve the people. +And, what then? Under the present <i>règime</i>, +they can do nothing but harm to the people.</p> +<p>The technologist or the mechanic has to work with +capital. Without capital he is good for nothing. All +his acquirements are such that for their display he requires +capital, and the exploitation of the laboring-man on the largest +scale; and—not to mention that he is trained to live, at +the lowest, on from fifteen hundred to two thousand a year, and +that, therefore, he cannot go to the country, where no one can +give him such wages,—he is, by virtue of his very +occupation, unfitted for serving the people. He knows how +to calculate the highest mathematical arch of a bridge, how to +calculate the force and transfer of the motive power, and so on; +but he is confounded by the simplest questions of a peasant: how +to improve a plough or a cart, or how to make irrigating +canals. All this in the conditions of life in which the +laboring man finds himself. Of this, he neither knows nor +understands any thing,—less, indeed, than the very +stupidest peasant. Give him workshops, all sorts of workmen +at his desire, an order for a machine from abroad, and he will +get along. But how to devise means of lightening toil, +under the conditions of labor of millions of men,—this is +what he does not and can not know; and because of his knowledge, +his habits, and his demands on life, he is unfitted for this +business.</p> +<p>In a still worse predicament is the physician. His +fancied science is all so arranged, that he only knows how to +heal those persons who do nothing. He requires an +incalculable quantity of expensive preparations, instruments, +drugs, and hygienic apparatus.</p> +<p>He has studied with celebrities in the capitals, who only +retain patients who can be cured in the hospital, or who, in the +course of their cure, can purchase the appliances requisite for +healing, and even go at once from the North to the South, to some +baths or other. Science is of such a nature, that every +rural physic-man laments because there are no means of curing +working-men, because he is so poor that he has not the means to +place the sick man in the proper hygienic conditions; and at the +same time this physician complains that there are no hospitals, +and that he cannot get through with his work, that he needs +assistants, more doctors and practitioners.</p> +<p>What is the inference? This: that the people’s +principal lack, from which diseases arise, and spread abroad, and +refuse to be healed, is the lack of means of subsistence. +And here Science, under the banner of the division of labor, +summons her warriors to the aid of the people. Science is +entirely arranged for the wealthy classes, and it has adopted for +its task the healing of the people who can obtain every thing for +themselves; and it attempts to heal those who possess no +superfluity, by the same means.</p> +<p>But there are no means, and therefore it is necessary to take +them from the people who are ailing, and pest-stricken, and who +cannot recover for lack of means. And now the defenders of +medicine for the people say that this matter has been, as yet, +but little developed. Evidently it has been but little +developed, because if (which God forbid!) it had been developed, +and that through oppressing the people,—instead of two +doctors, midwives, and practitioners in a district, twenty would +have settled down, since they desire this, and half the people +would have died through the difficulty of supporting this medical +staff, and soon there would be no one to heal.</p> +<p>Scientific co-operation with the people, of which the +defenders of science talk, must be something quite +different. And this co-operation which should exist has not +yet begun. It will begin when the man of science, +technologist or physician, will not consider it legal to take +from people—I will not say a hundred thousand, but even a +modest ten thousand, or five hundred rubles for assisting them; +but when he will live among the toiling people, under the same +conditions, and exactly as they do, then he will be able to apply +his knowledge to the questions of mechanics, technics, hygiene, +and the healing of the laboring people. But now science, +supporting itself at the expense of the working-people, has +entirely forgotten the conditions of life among these people, +ignores (as it puts it) these conditions, and takes very grave +offence because its fancied knowledge finds no adherents among +the people.</p> +<p>The domain of medicine, like the domain of technical science, +still lies untouched. All questions as to how the time of +labor is best divided, what is the best method of nourishment, +with what, in what shape, and when it is best to clothe +one’s self, to shoe one’s self, to counteract +dampness and cold, how best to wash one’s self, to feed the +children, to swaddle them, and so on, in just those conditions in +which the working-people find themselves,—all these +questions have not yet been propounded.</p> +<p>The same is the case with the activity of the teachers of +science,—pedagogical teachers. Exactly in the same +manner science has so arranged this matter, that only wealthy +people are able to study science, and teachers, like +technologists and physicians, cling to money.</p> +<p>And this cannot be otherwise, because a school built on a +model plan (as a general rule, the more scientifically built the +school, the more costly it is), with pivot chains, and globes, +and maps, and library, and petty text-books for teachers and +scholars and pedagogues, is a sort of thing for which it would be +necessary to double the taxes in every village. This +science demands. The people need money for their work; and +the more there is needed, the poorer they are.</p> +<p>Defenders of science say: “Pedagogy is even now proving +of advantage to the people, but give it a chance to develop, and +then it will do still better.” Yes, if it does +develop, and instead of twenty schools in a district there are a +hundred, and all scientific, and if the people support these +schools, they will grow poorer than ever, and they will more than +ever need work for their children’s sake. “What +is to be done?” they say to this. The government will +build the schools, and will make education obligatory, as it is +in Europe; but again, surely, the money is taken from the people +just the same, and it will be harder to work, and they will have +less leisure for work, and there will be no education even by +compulsion. Again the sole salvation is this: that the +teacher should live under the conditions of the working-men, and +should teach for that compensation which they give him freely and +voluntarily.</p> +<p>Such is the false course of science, which deprives it of the +power of fulfilling its obligation, which is, to serve the +people.</p> +<p>But in nothing is this false course of science so obviously +apparent, as in the vocation of art, which, from its very +significance, ought to be accessible to the people. Science +may fall back on its stupid excuse, that science acts for +science, and that when it turns out learned men it is laboring +for the people; but art, if it is art, should be accessible to +all the people, and in particular to those in whose name it is +executed. And our definition of art, in a striking manner, +convicts those who busy themselves with art, of their lack of +desire, lack of knowledge, and lack of power, to be useful to the +people.</p> +<p>The painter, for the production of his great works, must have +a studio of at least such dimensions that a whole association of +carpenters (forty in number) or shoemakers, now sickening or +stifling in lairs, would be able to work in it. But this is +not all; he must have a model, costumes, travels. Millions +are expended on the encouragement of art, and the products of +this art are both incomprehensible and useless to the +people. Musicians, in order to express their grand ideas, +must assemble two hundred men in white neckties, or in costumes, +and spend hundreds of thousands of rubles for the equipment of an +opera. And the products of this art cannot evoke from the +people—even if the latter could at any time enjoy +it—any thing except amazement and <i>ennui</i>.</p> +<p>Writers—authors—it appears, do not require +surroundings, studios, models, orchestras, and actors; but it +then appears that the author needs (not to mention comfort in his +quarters) all the dainties of life for the preparation of his +great works, travels, palaces, cabinets, libraries, the pleasures +of art, visits to theatres, concerts, the baths, and so on. +If he does not earn a fortune for himself, he is granted a +pension, in order that he may compose the better. And +again, these compositions, so prized by us, remain useless lumber +for the people, and utterly unserviceable to them.</p> +<p>And if still more of these dealers in spiritual nourishment +are developed further, as men of science desire, and a studio is +erected in every village; if an orchestra is set up, and authors +are supported in those conditions which artistic people regard as +indispensable for themselves,—I imagine that the +working-classes will sooner take an oath never to look at any +pictures, never to listen to a symphony, never to read poetry or +novels, than to feed all these persons.</p> +<p>And why, apparently, should art not be of service to the +people? In every cottage there are images and pictures; +every peasant man and woman sings; many own harmonicas; and all +recite stories and verses, and many read. It is as if those +two things which are made for each other—the lock and the +key—had parted company; they have sprung so far apart, that +not even the possibility of uniting them presents itself. +Tell the artist that he should paint without a studio, model, or +costumes, and that he should paint five-kopek pictures, and he +will say that that is tantamount to abandoning his art, as he +understands it. Tell the musician that he should play on +the harmonica, and teach the women to sing songs; say to the +poet, to the author, that he ought to cast aside his poems and +romances, and compose song-books, tales, and stories, +comprehensible to the uneducated people,—they will say that +you are mad.</p> +<p>The service of the people by science and art will only be +performed when people, dwelling in the midst of the common folk, +and, like the common folk, putting forward no demands, claiming +no rights, shall offer to the common folk their scientific and +artistic services; the acceptance or rejection of which shall +depend wholly on the will of the common folk.</p> +<p>It is said that the activity of science and art has aided in +the forward march of mankind,—meaning by this activity, +that which is now called by that name; which is the same as +saying that an unskilled banging of oars on a vessel that is +floating with the tide, which merely hinders the progress of the +vessel, is assisting the movement of the ship. It only +retards it. The so-called division of labor, which has +become in our day the condition of activity of men of science and +art, was, and has remained, the chief cause of the tardy forward +movement of mankind.</p> +<p>The proofs of this lie in that confession of all men of +science, that the gains of science and art are inaccessible to +the laboring masses, in consequence of the faulty distribution of +riches. The irregularity of this distribution does not +decrease in proportion to the progress of science and art, but +only increases. Men of art and science assume an air of +deep pity for this unfortunate circumstance which does not depend +upon them. But this unfortunate circumstance is produced by +themselves; for this irregular distribution of wealth flows +solely from the theory of the division of labor.</p> +<p>Science maintains the division of labor as a unalterable law; +it sees that the distribution of wealth, founded on the division +of labor, is wrong and ruinous; and it affirms that its activity, +which recognizes the division of labor, will lead people to +bliss. The result is, that some people make use of the +labor of others; but that, if they shall make use of the labor of +others for a very long period of time, and in still larger +measure, then this wrongful distribution of wealth, i.e., the use +of the labor of others, will come to an end.</p> +<p>Men stand beside a constantly swelling spring of water, and +are occupied with the problem of diverting it to one side, away +from the thirsty people, and they assert that they are producing +this water, and that soon enough will be collected for all. +But this water which has flowed, and which still flows +unceasingly, and nourishes all mankind, not only is not the +result of the activity of the men who, standing at its source, +turn it aside, but this water flows and gushes out, in spite of +the efforts of these men to obstruct its flow.</p> +<p>There have always existed a true science, and a true art; but +true science and art are not such because they called themselves +by that name. It always seems to those who claim at any +given period to be the representatives of science and art, that +they have performed, and are performing, and—most of +all—that they will presently perform, the most amazing +marvels, and that beside them there never has been and there is +not any science or any art. Thus it seemed to the sophists, +the scholastics, the alchemists, the cabalists, the talmudists; +and thus it seems to our own scientific science, and to our art +for the sake of art.</p> +<h3>CHAPTER V.</h3> +<p>“But art,—science! You repudiate art and +science; that is, you repudiate that by which mankind +lives!” People are constantly making this—it is +not a reply—to me, and they employ this mode of reception +in order to reject my deductions without examining into +them. “He repudiates science and art, he wants to +send people back again into a savage state; so what is the use of +listening to him and of talking to him?” But this is +unjust. I not only do not repudiate art and science, but, +in the name of that which is true art and true science, I say +that which I do say; merely in order that mankind may emerge from +that savage state into which it will speedily fall, thanks to the +erroneous teaching of our time,—only for this purpose do I +say that which I say.</p> +<p>Art and science are as indispensable as food and drink and +clothing,—more indispensable even; but they become so, not +because we decide that what we designate as art and science are +indispensable, but simply because they really are indispensable +to people.</p> +<p>Surely, if hay is prepared for the bodily nourishment of men, +the fact that we are convinced that hay is the proper food for +man will not make hay the food of man. Surely I cannot say, +“Why do not you eat hay, when it is the indispensable +food?” Food is indispensable, but it may happen that +that which I offer is not food at all. This same thing has +occurred with our art and science. It seems to us, that if +we add to a Greek word the word “logy,” and call that +a science, it will be a science; and, if we call any abominable +thing—like the dancing of nude females—by a Greek +word, choreography, that that is art, and that it will be +art. But no matter how much we may say this, the business +with which we occupy ourselves when we count beetles, and +investigate the chemical constituents of the stars in the Milky +Way, when we paint nymphs and compose novels and +symphonies,—our business will not become either art or +science until such time as it is accepted by those people for +whom it is wrought.</p> +<p>If it were decided that only certain people should produce +food, and if all the rest were forbidden to do this, or if they +were rendered incapable of producing food, I suppose that the +quality of food would be lowered. If the people who enjoyed +the monopoly of producing food were Russian peasants, there would +be no other food than black bread and cabbage-soup, and so on, +and kvas,—nothing except what they like, and what is +agreeable to them. The same thing would happen in the case +of that loftiest human pursuit, of arts and sciences, if one +caste were to arrogate to itself a monopoly of them: but with +this sole difference, that, in the matter of bodily food, there +can be no great departure from nature, and bread and +cabbage-soup, although not very savory viands, are fit for +consumption; but in spiritual food, there may exist the very +greatest departures from nature, and some people may feed +themselves for a long time on poisonous spiritual nourishment, +which is directly unsuitable for, or injurious to, them; they may +slowly kill themselves with spiritual opium or liquors, and they +may offer this same food to the masses.</p> +<p>It is this very thing that is going on among us. And it +has come about because the position of men of science and art is +a privileged one, because art and science (in our day), in our +world, are not at all a rational occupation of all mankind +without exception, exerting their best powers for the service of +art and science, but an occupation of a restricted circle of +people holding a monopoly of these industries, and entitling +themselves men of art and science, and who have, therefore, +perverted the very idea of art and science, and have lost all the +meaning of their vocation, and who are only concerned in amusing +and rescuing from crushing <i>ennui</i> their tiny circle of idle +mouths.</p> +<p>Ever since men have existed, they have always had science and +art in the simplest and broadest sense of the term. +Science, in the sense of the whole of knowledge acquired by +mankind, exists and always has existed, and life without it is +not conceivable; and there is no possibility of either attacking +or defending science, taken in this sense.</p> +<p>But the point lies here,—that the scope of the knowledge +of all mankind as a whole is so multifarious, ranging from the +knowledge of how to extract iron to the knowledge of the +movements of the planets, that man loses himself in this +multitude of existing knowledge,—knowledge capable of +<i>endless</i> possibilities, if he have no guiding thread, by +the aid of which he can classify this knowledge, and arrange the +branches according to the degrees of their significance and +importance.</p> +<p>Before a man undertakes to learn any thing whatever, he must +make up his mind that that branch of knowledge is of weight to +him, and of more weight and importance than the countless other +objects of study with which he is surrounded. Before +undertaking the study of any thing, a man decides for what +purpose he is studying this subject, and not the others. +But to study every thing, as the men of scientific science in our +day preach, without any idea of what is to come out of such +study, is downright impossible, because the number of subjects of +study is <i>endless</i>; and hence, no matter how many branches +we may acquire, their acquisition can possess no significance or +reason. And, therefore, in ancient times, down to even a +very recent date, until the appearance of scientific science, +man’s highest wisdom consisted in finding that guiding +thread, according to which the knowledge of men should be +classified as being of primary or of secondary importance. +And this knowledge, which forms the guide to all other branches +of knowledge, men have always called science in the strictest +acceptation of the word. And such science there has always +been, even down to our own day, in all human communities which +have emerged from their primal state of savagery.</p> +<p>Ever since mankind has existed, teachers have always arisen +among peoples, who have enunciated science in this restricted +sense,—the science of what it is most useful for man to +know. This science has always had for its object the +knowledge of what is the true ground of the well-being of each +individual man, and of all men, and why. Such was the +science of Confucius, of Buddha, of Socrates, of Mahomet, and of +others; such is this science as they understood it, and as all +men—with the exception of our little circle of so-called +cultured people—understand it. This science has not +only always occupied the highest place, but has been the only and +sole science, from which the standing of the rest has been +determined. And this was the case, not in the least +because, as the so-called scientific people of our day think, +cunning priestly teachers of this science attributed to it such +significance, but because in reality, as every one knows, both by +personal experience and by reflection, there can be no science +except the science of that in which the destiny and welfare of +man consist. For the objects of science are +<i>incalculable</i> in number,—I undermine the word +“incalculable” in the exact sense in which I +understand it,—and without the knowledge of that in which +the destiny and welfare of all men consist, there is no +possibility of making a choice amid this interminable multitude +of subjects; and therefore, without this knowledge, all other +arts and branches of learning will become, as they have become +among us, an idle and hurtful diversion.</p> +<p>Mankind has existed and existed, and never has it existed +without the science of that in which the destiny and the welfare +of men consist. It is true that the science of the welfare +of men appears different on superficial observation, among the +Buddhists, the Brahmins, the Hebrews, the Confucians, the +Tauists; but nevertheless, wherever we hear of men who have +emerged from a state of savagery, we find this science. And +all of a sudden it appears that the men of our day have decided +that this same science, which has hitherto served as the guiding +thread of all human knowledge, is the very thing which hinders +every thing. Men erect buildings; and one architect has +made one estimate of cost, a second has made another, and a third +yet another. The estimates differ somewhat; but they are +correct, so that any one can see, that, if the whole is carried +out in accordance with the calculations, the building will be +erected. Along come people, and assert that the chief point +lies in having no estimates, and that it should be built +thus—by the eye. And this “thus,” men +call the most accurate of scientific science. Men repudiate +every science, the very substance of science,—the +definition of the destiny and the welfare of men,—and this +repudiation they designate as science.</p> +<p>Ever since men have existed, great minds have been born into +their midst, which, in the conflict with reason and conscience, +have put to themselves questions as to “what constitutes +welfare,—the destiny and welfare, not of myself alone, but +of every man?” What does that power which has created +and which leads me, demand of me and of every man? And what +is it necessary for me to do, in order to comply with the +requirements imposed upon me by the demands of individual and +universal welfare? They have asked themselves: “I am +a whole, and also a part of something infinite, eternal; what, +then, are my relations to other parts similar to myself, to men +and to the whole—to the world?”</p> +<p>And from the voices of conscience and of reason, and from a +comparison of what their contemporaries and men who had lived +before them, and who had propounded to themselves the same +questions, had said, these great teachers have deduced their +doctrines, which were simple, clear, intelligible to all men, and +always such as were susceptible of fulfilment. Such men +have existed of the first, second, third, and lowest ranks. +The world is full of such men. Every living man propounds +the question to himself, how to reconcile the demands of welfare, +and of his personal existence, with conscience and reason; and +from this universal labor, slowly but uninterruptedly, new forms +of life, which are more in accord with the requirements of reason +and of conscience, are worked out.</p> +<p>All at once, a new caste of people makes its appearance, and +they say, “All this is nonsense; all this must be +abandoned.” This is the deductive method of +ratiocination (wherein lies the difference between the deductive +and the inductive method, no one can understand); these are the +dogmas of the technological and metaphysical period. Every +thing that these men discover by inward experience, and which +they communicate to one another, concerning their knowledge of +the law of their existence (of their functional activity, +according to their own jargon), every thing that the grandest +minds of mankind have accomplished in this direction, since the +beginning of the world,—all this is nonsense, and has no +weight whatever. According to this new doctrine, it appears +that you are cells: and that you, as a cell, have a very definite +functional activity, which you not only fulfil, but which you +infallibly feel within you; and that you are a thinking, talking, +understanding cell, and that you, for this reason, can ask +another similar talking cell whether it is just the same, and in +this way verify your own experience; that you can take advantage +of the fact that speaking cells, which have lived before you, +have written on the same subject, and that you have millions of +cells which confirm your observations by their agreement with the +cells which have written down their thoughts,—all this +signifies nothing; all this is an evil and an erroneous +method.</p> +<p>The true scientific method is this: If you wish to know in +what the destiny and the welfare of all mankind and of all the +world consists, you must, first of all, cease to listen to the +voices of your conscience and of your reason, which present +themselves in you and in others like you; you must cease to +believe all that the great teachers of mankind have said with +regard to your conscience and reason, and you must consider all +this as nonsense, and begin all over again. And, in order +to understand every thing from the beginning, you must look +through microscopes at the movements of amœbæ, and +cells in worms, or, with still greater composure, believe in +every thing that men with a diploma of infallibility shall say to +you about them. And as you gaze at the movements of these +cells, or read about what others have seen, you must attribute to +these cells your own human sensations and calculations as to what +they desire, whither they are directing themselves, how they +compare and discuss, and to what they have become accustomed; and +from these observations (in which there is not a word about an +error of thought or of expression) you must deduce a conclusion +by analogy as to what you are, what is your destiny, wherein lies +the welfare of yourself and of other cells like you. In +order to understand yourself, you must study not only the worms +which you see, but microscopic creatures which you can barely +see, and transformations from one set of creatures into others, +which no one has ever beheld, and which you, most assuredly, will +never behold. And the same with art. Where there has +been true science, art has always been its exponent.</p> +<p>Ever since men have been in existence, they have been in the +habit of deducing, from all pursuits, the expressions of various +branches of learning concerning the destiny and the welfare of +man, and the expression of this knowledge has been art in the +strict sense of the word.</p> +<p>Ever since men have existed, there have been those who were +peculiarly sensitive and responsive to the doctrine regarding the +destiny and welfare of man; who have given expression to their +own and the popular conflict, to the delusions which lead them +astray from their destinies, their sufferings in this conflict, +their hopes in the triumph of good, them despair over the triumph +of evil, and their raptures in the consciousness of the +approaching bliss of man, on viol and tabret, in images and +words. Always, down to the most recent times, art has +served science and life,—only then was it what has been so +highly esteemed of men. But art, in its capacity of an +important human activity, disappeared simultaneously with the +substitution for the genuine science of destiny and welfare, of +the science of any thing you choose to fancy. Art has +existed among all peoples, and will exist until that which among +us is scornfully called religion has come to be considered the +only science.</p> +<p>In our European world, so long as there existed a Church, as +the doctrine of destiny and welfare, and so long as the Church +was regarded as the only true science, art served the Church, and +remained true art: but as soon as art abandoned the Church, and +began to serve science, while science served whatever came to +hand, art lost its significance. And notwithstanding the +rights claimed on the score of ancient memories, and of the +clumsy assertion which only proves its loss of its calling, that +art serves art, it has become a trade, providing men with +something agreeable; and as such, it inevitably comes into the +category of choreographic, culinary, hair-dressing, and cosmetic +arts, whose practitioners designate themselves as artists, with +the same right as the poets, printers, and musicians of our +day.</p> +<p>Glance backward into the past, and you will see that in the +course of thousands of years, out of milliards of people, only +half a score of Confucius’, Buddhas, Solomons, Socrates, +Solons, and Homers have been produced. Evidently, they are +rarely met with among men, in spite of the fact that these men +have not been selected from a single caste, but from mankind at +large. Evidently, these true teachers and artists and +learned men, the purveyors of spiritual nourishment, are +rare. And it is not without reason that mankind has valued +and still values them so highly.</p> +<p>But it now appears, that all these great factors in the +science and art of the past are no longer of use to us. +Nowadays, scientific and artistic authorities can, in accordance +with the law of division of labor, be turned out by factory +methods; and, in one decade, more great men have been +manufactured in art and science, than have ever been born of such +among all nations, since the foundation of the world. +Nowadays there is a guild of learned men and artists, and they +prepare, by perfected methods, all that spiritual food which man +requires. And they have prepared so much of it, that it is +no longer necessary to refer to the elder authorities, who have +preceded them,—not only to the ancients, but to those much +nearer to us. All that was the activity of the theological +and metaphysical period,—all that must be wiped out: but +the true, the rational activity began, say, fifty years ago, and +in the course of those fifty years we have made so many great +men, that there are about ten great men to every branch of +science. And there have come to be so many sciences, that, +fortunately, it is easy to make them. All that is required +is to add the Greek word “logy” to the name, and +force them to conform to a set rubric, and the science is all +complete. They have created so many sciences, that not only +can no one man know them all, but not a single individual can +remember all the titles of all the existing sciences; the titles +alone form a thick lexicon, and new sciences are manufactured +every day. They have been manufactured on the pattern of +that Finnish teacher who taught the landed proprietor’s +children Finnish instead of French. Every thing has been +excellently inculcated; but there is one objection,—that no +one except ourselves can understand any thing of it, and all this +is reckoned as utterly useless nonsense. However, there is +an explanation even for this. People do not appreciate the +full value of scientific science, because they are under the +influence of the theological period, that profound period when +all the people, both among the Hebrews, and the Chinese, and the +Indians, and the Greeks, understood every thing that their great +teachers said to them.</p> +<p>But, from whatever cause this has come about, the fact +remains, that sciences and arts have always existed among +mankind, and, when they really did exist, they were useful and +intelligible to all the people. But we practise something +which we call science and art, but it appears that what we do is +unnecessary and unintelligible to man. And hence, however +beautiful may be the things that we accomplish, we have no right +to call them arts and sciences.</p> +<h3>CHAPTER VI.</h3> +<p>“But you only furnish a different definition of arts and +sciences, which is stricter, and is incompatible with +science,” I shall be told in answer to this; +“nevertheless, scientific and artistic activity does still +exist. There are the Galileos, Brunos, Homers, Michael +Angelos, Beethovens, and all the lesser learned men and artists, +who have consecrated their entire lives to the service of science +and art, and who were, and will remain, the benefactors of +mankind.”</p> +<p>Generally this is what people say, striving to forget that new +principle of the division of labor, on the basis of which science +and art now occupy their privileged position, and on whose basis +we are now enabled to decide without grounds, but by a given +standard: Is there, or is there not, any foundation for that +activity which calls itself science and art, to so magnify +itself?</p> +<p>When the Egyptian or the Grecian priests produced their +mysteries, which were unintelligible to any one, and stated +concerning these mysteries that all science and all art were +contained in them, I could not verify the reality of their +science on the basis of the benefit procured by them to the +people, because science, according to their assertions, was +supernatural. But now we all possess a very simple and +clear definition of the activity of art and science, which +excludes every thing supernatural: science and art promise to +carry out the mental activity of mankind, for the welfare of +society, or of all the human race.</p> +<p>The definition of scientific science and art is entirely +correct; but, unfortunately, the activity of the present arts and +sciences does not come under this head. Some of them are +directly injurious, others are useless, others still are +worthless,—good only for the wealthy. They do not +fulfil that which, by their own definition, they have undertaken +to accomplish; and hence they have as little right to regard +themselves as men of art and science, as a corrupt priesthood, +which does not fulfil the obligations which it has assumed, has +the right to regard itself as the bearer of divine truth.</p> +<p>And it can be understood why the makers of the present arts +and sciences have not fulfilled, and cannot fulfil, their +vocation. They do not fulfil it, because out of their +obligations they have erected a right.</p> +<p>Scientific and artistic activity, in its real sense, is only +fruitful when it knows no rights, but recognizes only +obligations. Only because it is its property to be always +thus, does mankind so highly prize this activity. If men +really were called to the service of others through artistic +work, they would see in that work only obligation, and they would +fulfil it with toil, with privations, and with +self-abnegation.</p> +<p>The thinker or the artist will never sit calmly on Olympian +heights, as we have become accustomed to represent them to +ourselves. The thinker or the artist should suffer in +company with the people, in order that he may find salvation or +consolation. Besides this, he will suffer because he is +always and eternally in turmoil and agitation: he might decide +and say that that which would confer welfare on men, would free +them from suffering, would afford them consolation; but he has +not said so, and has not presented it as he should have done; he +has not decided, and he has not spoken; and to-morrow, possibly, +it will be too late,—he will die. And therefore +suffering and self-sacrifice will always be the lot of the +thinker and the artist.</p> +<p>Not of this description will be the thinker and artist who is +reared in an establishment where, apparently, they manufacture +the learned man or the artist (but in point of fact, they +manufacture destroyers of science and of art), who receives a +diploma and a certificate, who would be glad not to think and not +to express that which is imposed on his soul, but who cannot +avoid doing that to which two irresistible forces draw +him,—an inward prompting, and the demand of men.</p> +<p>There will be no sleek, plump, self-satisfied thinkers and +artists. Spiritual activity, and its expression, which are +actually necessary to others, are the most burdensome of all +man’s avocations; a cross, as the Gospels phrase it. +And the sole indubitable sign of the presence of a vocation is +self-devotion, the sacrifice of self for the manifestation of the +power that is imposed upon man for the benefit of others.</p> +<p>It is possible to study out how many beetles there are in the +world, to view the spots on the sun, to write romances and +operas, without suffering; but it is impossible, without +self-sacrifice, to instruct people in their true happiness, which +consists solely in renunciation of self and the service of +others, and to give strong expression to this doctrine, without +self-sacrifice.</p> +<p>Christ did not die on the cross in vain; not in vain does the +sacrifice of suffering conquer all things.</p> +<p>But our art and science are provided with certificates and +diplomas; and the only anxiety of all men is, how to still better +guarantee them, i.e., how to render the service of the people +impracticable for them.</p> +<p>True art and true science possess two unmistakable marks: the +first, an inward mark, which is this, that the servitor of art +and science will fulfil his vocation, not for profit but with +self-sacrifice; and the second, an external sign,—his +productions will be intelligible to all the people whose welfare +he has in view.</p> +<p>No matter what people have fixed upon as their vocation and +their welfare, science will be the doctrine of this vocation and +welfare, and art will be the expression of that doctrine. +That which is called science and art, among us, is the product of +idle minds and feelings, which have for their object to tickle +similar idle minds and feelings. Our arts and sciences are +incomprehensible, and say nothing to the people, for they have +not the welfare of the common people in view.</p> +<p>Ever since the life of men has been known to us, we find, +always and everywhere, the reigning doctrine falsely designating +itself as science, not manifesting itself to the common people, +but obscuring for them the meaning of life. Thus it was +among the Greeks the sophists, then among the Christians the +mystics, gnostics, scholastics, among the Hebrews the Talmudists +and Cabalists, and so on everywhere, down to our own times.</p> +<p>How fortunate it is for us that we live in so peculiar an age, +when that mental activity which calls itself science, not only +does not err, but finds itself, as we are assured, in a +remarkably flourishing condition! Does not this peculiar +good fortune arise from the fact that man can not and will not +see his own hideousness? Why is there nothing left of those +sciences, and sophists, and Cabalists, and Talmudists, but words, +while we are so exceptionally happy? Surely the signs are +identical. There is the same self-satisfaction and blind +confidence that we, precisely we, and only we, are on the right +path, and that the real thing is only beginning with us. +There is the same expectation that we shall discover something +remarkable; and that chief sign which leads us astray convicts us +of our error: all our wisdom remains with us, and the common +people do not understand, and do not accept, and do not need +it.</p> +<p>Our position is a very difficult one, but why not look at it +squarely?</p> +<p>It is time to recover our senses, and to scrutinize +ourselves. Surely we are nothing else than the scribes and +Pharisees, who sit in Moses’ seat, and who have taken the +keys of the kingdom of heaven, and will neither go in ourselves, +nor permit others to go in. Surely we, the high priests of +science and art, are ourselves worthless deceivers, possessing +much less right to our position than the most crafty and depraved +priests. Surely we have no justification for our privileged +position. The priests had a right to their position: they +declared that they taught the people life and salvation. +But we have taken their place, and we do not instruct the people +in life,—we even admit that such instruction is +unnecessary,—but we educate our children in the same +Talmudic-Greek and Latin grammar, in order that they may be able +to pursue the same life of parasites which we lead +ourselves. We say, “There used to be castes, but +there are none among us.” But what does it mean, that +some people and their children toil, while other people and their +children do not toil?</p> +<p>Bring hither an Indian ignorant of our language, and show him +European life, and our life, for several generations, and he will +recognize the same leading, well-defined castes—of laborers +and non-laborers—as there are in his own country. And +as in his land, so in ours, the right of refusing to labor is +conferred by a peculiar consecration, which we call science and +art, or, in general terms, culture. It is this culture, and +all the distortions of sense connected with it, which have +brought us to that marvellous madness, in consequence of which we +do not see that which is so clear and indubitable.</p> +<h3>CHAPTER VII.</h3> +<p>Then, what is to be done? What are we to do?</p> +<p>This question, which includes within itself both an admission +that our life is evil and wrong, and in connection with +this,—as though it were an exercise for it,—that it +is impossible, nevertheless, to change it, this question I have +heard, and I continue to hear, on all sides. I have +described my own sufferings, my own gropings, and my own solution +of this question. I am the same kind of a man as everybody +else; and if I am in any wise distinguished from the average man +of our circle, it is chiefly in this respect, that I, more than +the average man, have served and winked at the false doctrine of +our world; I have received more approbation from men professing +the prevailing doctrine: and therefore, more than others, have I +become depraved, and wandered from the path. And therefore +I think that the solution of the problem, which I have found in +my own case, will be applicable to all sincere people who are +propounding the same question to themselves.</p> +<p>First of all, in answer to the question, “What is to be +done?” I told myself: “I must lie neither to other +people nor to myself. I must not fear the truth, +whithersoever it may lead me.”</p> +<p>We all know what it means to lie to other people, but we are +not afraid to lie to ourselves; yet the very worst downright lie, +to other people, is not to be compared in its consequences with +the lie to ourselves, upon which we base our whole life.</p> +<p>This is the lie of which we must not be guilty if we are to be +in a position to answer the question: “What is to be +done?” And, in fact, how am I to answer the question, +“What is to be done?” when every thing that I do, +when my whole life, is founded on a lie, and when I carefully +parade this lie as the truth before others and before +myself? Not to lie, in this sense, means not to fear the +truth, not to devise subterfuges, and not to accept the +subterfuges devised by others for the purpose of hiding from +myself the deductions of my reason and my conscience; not to fear +to part company with all those who surround me, and to remain +alone in company with reason and conscience; not to fear that +position to which the truth shall lead me, being firmly convinced +that that position to which truth and conscience shall conduct +me, however singular it may be, cannot be worse than the one +which is founded on a lie. Not to lie, in our position of +privileged persons of mental labor, means, not to be afraid to +reckon one’s self up wrongly. It is possible that you +are already so deeply indebted that you cannot take stock of +yourself; but to whatever extent this may be the case, however +long may be the account, however far you have strayed from the +path, it is still better than to continue therein. A lie to +other people is not alone unprofitable; every matter is settled +more directly and more speedily by the truth than by a lie. +A lie to others only entangles matters, and delays the +settlement; but a lie to one’s self, set forth as the +truth, ruins a man’s whole life. If a man, having +entered on the wrong path, assumes that it is the true one, then +every step that he takes on that path removes him farther from +his goal. If a man who has long been travelling on this +false path divines for himself, or is informed by some one, that +his course is a mistaken one, but grows alarmed at the idea that +he has wandered very far astray and tries to convince himself +that he may, possibly, still strike into the right road, then he +never will get into it. If a man quails before the truth, +and, on perceiving it, does not accept it, but does accept a lie +for the truth, then he never will learn what he ought to +do. We, the not only wealthy, but privileged and so-called +cultivated persons, have advanced so far on the wrong road, that +a great deal of determination, or a very great deal of suffering +on the wrong road, is required, in order to bring us to our +senses and to the acknowledgment of the lie in which we are +living. I have perceived the lie of our lives, thanks to +the sufferings which the false path entailed upon me, and, having +recognized the falseness of this path on which I stood, I have +had the boldness to go at first in thought only—whither +reason and conscience led me, without reflecting where they would +bring me out. And I have been rewarded for this +boldness.</p> +<p>All the complicated, broken, tangled, and incoherent phenomena +of life surrounding me, have suddenly become clear; and my +position in the midst of these phenomena, which was formerly +strange and burdensome, has become, all at once, natural, and +easy to bear.</p> +<p>In this new position, my activity was defined with perfect +accuracy; not at all as it had previously presented itself to me, +but as a new and much more peaceful, loving, and joyous +activity. The very thing which had formerly terrified me, +now began to attract me. Hence I think, that the man who +will honestly put to himself the question, “What is to be +done?” and, replying to this query, will not lie to +himself, but will go whither his reason leads, has already solved +the problem.</p> +<p>There is only one thing that can hinder him in his search for +an issue,—an erroneously lofty idea of himself and of his +position. This was the case with me; and then another, +arising from the first answer to the question: “What is to +be done?” consisted for me in this, that it was necessary +for me to repent, in the full sense of that word,—i.e., to +entirely alter my conception of my position and my activity; to +confess the hurtfulness and emptiness of my activity, instead of +its utility and gravity; to confess my own ignorance instead of +culture; to confess my immorality and harshness in the place of +my kindness and morality; instead of my elevation, to acknowledge +my lowliness. I say, that in addition to not lying to +myself, I had to repent, because, although the one flows from the +other, a false conception of my lofty importance had so grown up +with me, that, until I sincerely repented and cut myself free +from that false estimate which I had formed of myself, I did not +perceive the greater part of the lie of which I had been guilty +to myself. Only when I had repented, that is to say, when I +had ceased to look upon myself as a regular man, and had begun to +regard myself as a man exactly like every one else,—only +then did my path become clear before me. Before that time I +had not been able to answer the question: “What is to be +done?” because I had stated the question itself +wrongly.</p> +<p>As long as I did not repent, I put the question thus: +“What sphere of activity should I choose, I, the man who +has received the education and the talents which have fallen to +my shame? How, in this fashion, make recompense with that +education and those talents, for what I have taken, and for what +I still take, from the people?” This question was +wrong, because it contained a false representation, to the effect +that I was not a man just like them, but a peculiar man called to +serve the people with those talents and with that education which +I had won by the efforts of forty years.</p> +<p>I propounded the query to myself; but, in reality, I had +answered it in advance, in that I had in advance defined the sort +of activity which was agreeable to me, and by which I was called +upon to serve the people. I had, in fact, asked myself: +“In what manner could I, so very fine a writer, who had +acquired so much learning and talents, make use of them for the +benefit of the people?”</p> +<p>But the question should have been put as it would have stood +for a learned rabbi who had gone through the course of the +Talmud, and had learned by heart the number of letters in all the +holy books, and all the fine points of his art. The +question for me, as for the rabbi, should stand thus: “What +am I, who have spent, owing to the misfortune of my surroundings, +the year’s best fitted for study in the acquisition of +grammar, geography, judicial science, poetry, novels and +romances, the French language, pianoforte playing, philosophical +theories, and military exercises, instead of inuring myself to +labor; what am I, who have passed the best years of my life in +idle occupations which are corrupting to the soul,—what am +I to do in defiance of these unfortunate conditions of the past, +in order that I may requite those people who during the whole +time have fed and clothed, yes, and who even now continue to feed +and clothe me?” Had the question then stood as it +stands before me now, after I have repented,—“What am +I, so corrupt a man, to do?” the answer would have been +easy: “To strive, first of all, to support myself honestly; +that is, to learn not to live upon others; and while I am +learning, and when I have learned this, to render aid on all +possible occasions to the people, with my hands, and my feet, and +my brain, and my heart, and with every thing to which the people +should present a claim.”</p> +<p>And therefore I say, that for the man of our circle, in +addition to not lying to himself or to others, repentance is also +necessary, and that he should scrape from himself that pride +which has sprung up in us, in our culture, in our refinements, in +our talents; and that he should confess that he is not a +benefactor of the people and a distinguished man, who does not +refuse to share with the people his useful acquirements, but that +he should confess himself to be a thoroughly guilty, corrupt, and +good-for-nothing man, who desires to reform himself and not to +behave benevolently towards the people, but simply to cease +wounding and insulting them.</p> +<p>I often hear the questions of good young men who sympathize +with the renunciatory part of my writings, and who ask, +“Well, and what then shall I do? What am I to do, now +that I have finished my course in the university, or in some +other institution, in order that I may be of use?” +Young men ask this, and in the depths of their soul it is already +decided that the education which they have received constitutes +their privilege and that they desire to serve the people +precisely by means of thus superiority. And hence, one +thing which they will in no wise do, is to bear themselves +honestly and critically towards that which they call their +culture, and ask themselves, are those qualities which they call +their culture good or bad? If they will do this, they will +infallibly be led to see the necessity of renouncing their +culture, and the necessity of beginning to learn all over again; +and this is the one indispensable thing. They can in no +wise solve the problem, “What to do?” because this +question does not stand before them as it should stand. The +question must stand thus: “In what manner am I, a helpless, +useless man, who, owing to the misfortune of my conditions, have +wasted my best years of study in conning the scientific Talmud +which corrupts soul and body, to correct this mistake, and learn +to serve the people?” But it presents itself to them +thus: “How am I, a man who has acquired so much very fine +learning, to turn this very fine learning to the use of the +people?” And such a man will never answer the +question, “What is to be done?” until he +repents. And repentance is not terrible, just as truth is +not terrible, and it is equally joyful and fruitful. It is +only necessary to accept the truth wholly, and to repent wholly, +in order to understand that no one possesses any rights, +privileges, or peculiarities in the matter of this life of ours, +but that there are no ends or bounds to obligation, and that a +man’s first and most indubitable duty is to take part in +the struggle with nature for his own life and for the lives of +others.</p> +<p>And this confession of a man’s obligation constitutes +the gist of the third answer to the question, “What is to +be done?”</p> +<p>I tried not to lie to myself: I tried to cast out from myself +the remains of my false conceptions of the importance of my +education and talents, and to repent; but on the way to a +decision of the question, “What to do?” a fresh +difficulty arose. There are so many different occupations, +that an indication was necessary as to the precise one which was +to be adopted. And the answer to this question was +furnished me by sincere repentance for the evil in which I had +lived.</p> +<p>“What to do? Precisely what to do?” all ask, +and that is what I also asked so long as, under the influence of +my exalted idea of any own importance, I did not perceive that my +first and unquestionable duty was to feed myself, to clothe +myself, to furnish my own fuel, to do my own building, and, by so +doing, to serve others, because, ever since the would has +existed, the first and indubitable duty of every man has +consisted and does consist in this.</p> +<p>In fact, no matter what a man may have assumed to be his +vocation,—whether it be to govern people, to defend his +fellow-countrymen, to divine service, to instruct others, to +invent means to heighten the pleasures of life, to discover the +laws of the world, to incorporate eternal truths in artistic +representations,—the duty of a reasonable man is to take +part in the struggle with nature, for the sustenance of his own +life and of that of others. This obligation is the first of +all, because what people need most of all is their life; and +therefore, in order to defend and instruct the people, and render +their lives more agreeable, it is requisite to preserve that life +itself, while my refusal to share in the struggle, my monopoly of +the labors of others, is equivalent to annihilation of the lives +of others. And, therefore, it is not rational to serve the +lives of men by annihilating the lives of men; and it is +impossible to say that I am serving men, when, by my life, I am +obviously injuring them.</p> +<p>A man’s obligation to struggle with nature for the +acquisition of the means of livelihood will always be the first +and most unquestionable of all obligations, because this +obligation is a law of life, departure from which entails the +inevitable punishment of either bodily or mental annihilation of +the life of man. If a man living alone excuses himself from +the obligation of struggling with nature, he is immediately +punished, in that his body perishes. But if a man excuses +himself from this obligation by making other people fulfil it for +him, then also he is immediately punished by the annihilation of +his mental life; that is to say, of the life which possesses +rational thought.</p> +<p>In this one act, man receives—if the two things are to +be separated—full satisfaction of the bodily and spiritual +demands of his nature. The feeding, clothing, and taking +care of himself and his family, constitute the satisfaction of +the bodily demands and requirements; and doing the same for other +people, constitutes the satisfaction of his spiritual +requirements. Every other employment of man is only legal +when it is directed to the satisfaction of this very first duty +of man; for the fulfilment of this duty constitutes the whole +life of man.</p> +<p>I had been so turned about by my previous life, this first and +indubitable law of God or of nature is so concealed in our sphere +of society, that the fulfilment of this law seemed to me strange, +terrible, even shameful; as though the fulfilment of an eternal, +unquestionable law, and not the departure from it, can be +terrible, strange, and shameful.</p> +<p>At first it seemed to me that the fulfilment of this matter +required some preparation, arrangement or community of men, +holding similar views,—the consent of one’s family, +life in the country; it seemed to me disgraceful to make a show +of myself before people, to undertake a thing so improper in our +conditions of existence, as bodily toil, and I did not know how +to set about it. But it was only necessary for me to +understand that this is no exclusive occupation which requires to +be invented and arranged for, but that this employment was merely +a return from the false position in which I found myself, to a +natural one; was only a rectification of that lie in which I was +living. I had only to recognize this fact, and all these +difficulties vanished. It was not in the least necessary to +make preparations and arrangements, and to await the consent of +others, for, no matter in what position I had found myself, there +had always been people who had fed, clothed and warmed me, in +addition to themselves; and everywhere, under all conditions, I +could do the same for myself and for them, if I had the time and +the strength. Neither could I experience false shame in an +unwonted occupation, no matter how surprising it might be to +people, because, through not doing it, I had already experienced +not false but real shame.</p> +<p>And when I had reached this confession and the practical +deduction from it, I was fully rewarded for not having quailed +before the deductions of reason, and for following whither they +led me. On arriving at this practical deduction, I was +amazed at the ease and simplicity with which all the problems +which had previously seemed to me so difficult and so +complicated, were solved.</p> +<p>To the question, “What is it necessary to do?” the +most indubitable answer presented itself: first of all, that +which it was necessary for me to do was, to attend to my own +samovar, my own stove, my own water, my own clothing; to every +thing that I could do for myself. To the question, +“Will it not seem strange to people if you do this?” +it appeared that this strangeness lasted only a week, and after +the lapse of that week, it would have seemed strange had I +returned to my former conditions of life. With regard to +the question, “Is it necessary to organize this physical +labor, to institute an association in the country, on my +land?” it appeared that nothing of the sort was necessary; +that labor, if it does not aim at the acquisition of all possible +leisure, and the enjoyment of the labor of others,—like the +labor of people bent on accumulating money,—but if it have +for its object the satisfaction of requirements, will itself be +drawn from the city to the country, to the land, where this labor +is the most fruitful and cheerful. But it is not requisite +to institute any association, because the man who labors, +naturally and of himself, attaches himself to the existing +association of laboring men.</p> +<p>To the question, whether this labor would not monopolize all +my time, and deprive me of those intellectual pursuits which I +love, to which I am accustomed, and which, in my moments of +self-conceit, I regard as not useless to others? I received a +most unexpected reply. The energy of my intellectual +activity increased, and increased in exact proportion with bodily +application, while freeing itself from every thing +superfluous. It appeared that by dedicating to physical +toil eight hours, that half of the day which I had formerly +passed in the oppressive state of a struggle with <i>ennui</i>, +eight hours remained to me, of which only five of intellectual +activity, according to my terms, were necessary to me. For +it appeared, that if I, a very voluminous writer, who had done +nothing for nearly forty years except write, and who had written +three hundred printed sheets;—if I had worked during all +those forty years at ordinary labor with the working-people, +then, not reckoning winter evenings and leisure days, if I had +read and studied for five hours every day, and had written a +couple of pages only on holidays (and I have been in the habit of +writing at the rate of one printed sheet a day), then I should +have written those three hundred sheets in fourteen years. +The fact seemed startling: yet it is the most simple arithmetical +calculation, which can be made by a seven-year-old boy, but which +I had not been able to make up to this time. There are +twenty-four hours in the day; if we take away eight hours, +sixteen remain. If any man engaged in intellectual +occupations devote five hours every day to his occupation, he +will accomplish a fearful amount. And what is to be done +with the remaining eleven hours?</p> +<p>It proved that physical labor not only does not exclude the +possibility of mental activity, but that it improves its quality, +and encourages it.</p> +<p>In answer to the question, whether this physical toil does not +deprive me of many innocent pleasures peculiar to man, such as +the enjoyment of the arts, the acquisition of learning, +intercourse with people, and the delights of life in general, it +turned out exactly the reverse: the more intense the labor, the +more nearly it approached what is considered the coarsest +agricultural toil, the more enjoyment and knowledge did I gain, +and the more did I come into close and loving communion with men, +and the more happiness did I derive from life.</p> +<p>In answer to the question (which I have so often heard from +persons not thoroughly sincere), as to what result could flow +from so insignificant a drop in the sea of sympathy as my +individual physical labor in the sea of labor ingulfing me, I +received also the most satisfactory and unexpected of +answers. It appeared that all I had to do was to make +physical labor the habitual condition of my life, and the +majority of my false, but precious, habits and my demands, when +physically idle, fell away from me at once of their own accord, +without the slightest exertion on my part. Not to mention +the habit of turning day into night and <i>vice versa</i>, my +habits connected with my bed, with my clothing, with conventional +cleanliness,—which are downright impossible and oppressive +with physical labor,—and my demands as to the quality of my +food, were entirely changed. In place of the dainty, rich, +refined, complicated, highly-spiced food, to which I had formerly +inclined, the most simple viands became needful and most pleasing +of all to me,—cabbage-soup, porridge, black bread, and tea +<i>v prikusku</i>. <a name="citation238"></a><a +href="#footnote238" class="citation">[238]</a> So that, not +to mention the influence upon me of the example of the simple +working-people, who are content with little, with whom I came in +contact in the course of my bodily toil, my very requirements +underwent a change in consequence of my toilsome life; so that my +drop of physical labor in the sea of universal labor became +larger and larger, in proportion as I accustomed myself to, and +appropriated, the habits of the laboring classes; in proportion, +also, to the success of my labor, my demands for labor from +others grew less and less, and my life naturally, without +exertion or privations, approached that simple existence of which +I could not even dream without fulfilling the law of labor.</p> +<p>It proved that my dearest demands from life, namely, my +demands for vanity, and diversion from <i>ennui</i>, arose +directly from my idle life. There was no place for vanity, +in connection with physical labor; and no diversions were needed, +since my time was pleasantly occupied, and, after my fatigue, +simple rest at tea over a book, or in conversation with my +fellows, was incomparably more agreeable than theatres, cards, +conceits, or a large company,—all which things are needed +in physical idleness, and which cost a great deal.</p> +<p>In answer to the question, Would not this unaccustomed toil +ruin that health which is indispensable in order to render +service to the people possible? it appeared, in spite of the +positive assertions of noted physicians, that physical exertion, +especially at my age, might have the most injurious consequences +(but that Swedish gymnastics, the massage treatment, and so on, +and other expedients intended to take the place of the natural +conditions of man’s life, were better), that the more +intense the toil, the stronger, more alert, more cheerful, and +more kindly did I feel. Thus it undoubtedly appeared, that, +just as all those cunning devices of the human mind, newspapers, +theatres, concerts, visits, balls, cards, journals, romances, are +nothing else than expedients for maintaining the spiritual life +of man outside his natural conditions of labor for +others,—just so all the hygienic and medical devices of the +human mind for the preparation of food, drink, lodging, +ventilation, heating, clothing, medicine, water, massage, +gymnastics, electric, and other means of healing,—all these +clever devices are merely an expedient to sustain the bodily life +of man removed from its natural conditions of labor. It +turned out that all these devices of the human mind for the +agreeable arrangement of the physical existence of idle persons +are precisely analogous to those artful contrivances which people +might invent for the production in vessels hermetically sealed, +by means of mechanical arrangements, of evaporation, and plants, +of the air best fitted for breathing, when all that is needed is +to open the window. All the inventions of medicine and +hygiene for persons of our sphere are much the same as though a +mechanic should hit upon the idea of heating a steam-boiler which +was not working, and should shut all the valves so that the +boiler should not burst. Only one thing is needed, instead +of all these extremely complicated devices for pleasure, for +comfort, and for medical and hygienic preparations, intended to +save people from their spiritual and bodily ailments, which +swallow up so much labor,—to fulfil the law of life; to do +that which is proper not only to man, but to the animal; to fire +off the charge of energy taken win in the shape of food, by +muscular exertion; to speak in plain language, to earn +one’s bread. Those who do not work should not eat, or +they should earn as much as they have eaten.</p> +<p>And when I clearly comprehended all this, it struck me as +ridiculous. Through a whole series of doubts and +searchings, I had arrived, by a long course of thought, at this +remarkable truth: if a man has eyes, it is that he may see with +them; if he has ears, that he may hear; and feet, that he may +walk; and hands and back, that he may labor; and that if a man +will not employ those members for that purpose for which they are +intended, it will be the worse for him.</p> +<p>I came to this conclusion, that, with us privileged people, +the same thing has happened which happened with the horses of a +friend of mine. His steward, who was not a lover of horses, +nor well versed in them, on receiving his master’s orders +to place the best horses in the stable, selected them from the +stud, placed them in stalls, and fed and watered them; but +fearing for the valuable steeds, he could not bring himself to +trust them to any one, and he neither rode nor drove them, nor +did he even take them out. The horses stood there until +they were good for nothing. The same thing has happened +with us, but with this difference: that it was impossible to +deceive the horses in any way, and they were kept in bonds to +prevent their getting out; but we are kept in an unnatural +position that is equally injurious to us, by deceits which have +entangled us, and which hold us like chains.</p> +<p>We have arranged for ourselves a life that is repugnant both +to the moral and the physical nature of man, and all the powers +of our intelligence we concentrate upon assuring man that this is +the most natural life possible. Every thing which we call +culture,—our sciences, art, and the perfection of the +pleasant thing’s of life,—all these are attempts to +deceive the moral requirements of man; every thing that is called +hygiene and medicine, is an attempt to deceive the natural +physical demands of human nature. But these deceits have +their bounds, and we advance to them. “If such be the +real human life, then it is better not to live at all,” +says the reigning and extremely fashionable philosophy of +Schopenhauer and Hartmann. If such is life, ’tis +better for the coming generation not to live,” say corrupt +medical science and its newly devised means to that end.</p> +<p>In the Bible, it is laid down as the law of man: “In the +sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, and in sorrow thou shalt +bring forth children;” but “<i>nous avons +changé tout ca</i>,” as Molière’s +character says, when expressing himself with regard to medicine, +and asserting that the liver was on the left side. We have +changed all that. Men need not work in order to eat, and +women need not bear children.</p> +<p>A ragged peasant roams the Krapivensky district. During +the war he was an agent for the purchase of grain, under an +official of the commissary department. On being brought in +contact with the official, and seeing his luxurious life, the +peasant lost his mind, and thought that he might get along +without work, like gentlemen, and receive proper support from the +Emperor. This peasant now calls himself “the Most +Serene Warrior, Prince Blokhin, purveyor of war supplies of all +descriptions.” He says of himself that he has +“passed through all the ranks,” and that when he +shall have served out his term in the army, he is to receive from +the Emperor an unlimited bank account, clothes, uniforms, horses, +equipages, tea, pease and servants, and all sorts of +luxuries. This man is ridiculous in the eyes of many, but +to me the significance of his madness is terrible. To the +question, whether he does not wish to work, he always replies +proudly: “I am much obliged. The peasants will attend +to all that.” When you tell him that the peasants do +not wish to work, either, he answers: “It is not difficult +for the peasant.”</p> +<p>He generally talks in a high-flown style, and is fond of +verbal substantives. “Now there is an invention of +machinery for the alleviation of the peasants,” he says; +“there is no difficulty for them in that.” When +he is asked what he lives for, he replies, “To pass the +time.” I always look on this man as on a +mirror. I behold in him myself and all my class. To +pass through all the ranks (<i>tchini</i>) in order to live for +the purpose of passing the time, and to receive an unlimited bank +account, while the peasants, for whom this is not difficult, +because of the invention of machinery, do the whole +business,—this is the complete formula of the idiotic creed +of the people of our sphere in society.</p> +<p>When we inquire precisely what we are to do, surely, we ask +nothing, but merely assert—only not in such good faith as +the Most Serene Prince Blokhin, who has been promoted through all +ranks, and lost his mind—that we do not wish to do any +thing.</p> +<p>He who will reflect for a moment cannot ask thus, because, on +the one hand, every thing that he uses has been made, and is +made, by the hands of men; and, on the other side, as soon as a +healthy man has awakened and eaten, the necessity of working with +feet and hands and brain makes itself felt. In order to +find work and to work, he need only not hold back: only a person +who thinks work disgraceful—like the lady who requests her +guest not to take the trouble to open the door, but to wait until +she can call a man for this purpose—can put to himself the +question, what he is to do.</p> +<p>The point does not lie in inventing work,—you can never +get through all the work that is to be done for yourself and for +others,—but the point lies in weaning one’s self from +that criminal view of life in accordance with which I eat and +sleep for my own pleasure; and in appropriating to myself that +just and simple view with which the laboring man grows up and +lives,—that man is, first of all, a machine, which loads +itself with food in order to sustain itself, and that it is +therefore disgraceful, wrong, and impossible to eat and not to +work; that to eat and not to work is the most impious, unnatural, +and, therefore, dangerous position, in the nature of the sin of +Sodom. Only let this acknowledgement be made, and there +will be work; and work will always be joyous and satisfying to +both spiritual and bodily requirements.</p> +<p>The matter presented itself to me thus: The day is divided for +every man, by food itself, into four parts, or four stints, as +the peasants call it: (1) before breakfast; (2) from breakfast +until dinner; (3) from dinner until four o’clock; (4) from +four o’clock until evening.</p> +<p>A man’s employment, whatever it may be that he feels a +need for in his own person, is also divided into four categories: +(1) the muscular employment of power, labor of the hands, feet, +shoulders, back,—hard labor, from which you sweat; (2) the +employment of the fingers and wrists, the employment of artisan +skill; (3) the employment of the mind and imagination; (4) the +employment of intercourse with others.</p> +<p>The benefits which man enjoys are also divided into four +categories. Every man enjoys, in the first place, the +product of hard labor,—grain, cattle, buildings, wells, +ponds, and so forth; in the second place, the results of artisan +toil,—clothes, boots, utensils, and so forth; in the third +place, the products of mental activity,—science, art; and, +in the forth place, established intercourse between people.</p> +<p>And it struck me, that the best thing of all would be to +arrange the occupations of the day in such a manner as to +exercise all four of man’s capacities, and myself produce +all these four sorts of benefits which men make use of, so that +one portion of the day, the first, should be dedicated to hard +labor; the second, to intellectual labor; the third, to artisan +labor; and the forth, to intercourse with people. It struck +me, that only then would that false division of labor, which +exists in our society, be abrogated, and that just division of +labor established, which does not destroy man’s +happiness.</p> +<p>I, for example, have busied myself all my life with +intellectual labor. I said to myself, that I had so divided +labor, that writing, that is to say, intellectual labor, is my +special employment, and the other matters which were necessary to +me I had left free (or relegated, rather) to others. But +this, which would appear to have been the most advantageous +arrangement for intellectual toil, was precisely the most +disadvantageous to mental labor, not to mention its +injustice.</p> +<p>All my life long, I have regulated my whole life, food, sleep, +diversion, in view of these hours of special labor, and I have +done nothing except this work. The result of this has been, +in the first place, that I have contracted my sphere of +observations and knowledge, and have frequently had no means for +the study even of problems which often presented themselves in +describing the life of the people (for the life of the common +people is the every-day problem of intellectual activity). +I was conscious of my ignorance, and was obliged to obtain +instruction, to ask about things which are known by every man not +engaged in special labor. In the second place, the result +was, that I had been in the habit of sitting down to write when I +had no inward impulse to write, and when no one demanded from me +writing, as writing, that is to say, my thoughts, but when my +name was merely wanted for journalistic speculation. I +tried to squeeze out of myself what I could. Sometimes I +could extract nothing; sometimes it was very wretched stuff, and +I was dissatisfied and grieved. But now that I have learned +the indispensability of physical labor, both hard and artisan +labor, the result is entirely different. My time has been +occupied, however modestly, at least usefully and cheerfully, and +in a manner instructive to me. And therefore I have torn +myself from that indubitably useful and cheerful occupation for +my special duties only when I felt an inward impulse, and when I +saw a demand made upon me directly for my literary work.</p> +<p>And these demands called into play only good nature, and +therefore the usefulness and the joy of my special labor. +Thus it turned out, that employment in those physical labors +which are indispensable to me, as they are to every man, not only +did not interfere with my special activity, but was an +indispensable condition of the usefulness, worth, and +cheerfulness of that activity.</p> +<p>The bird is so constructed, that it is indispensable that it +should fly, walk, peek, combine; and when it does all this, it is +satisfied and happy,—then it is a bird. Just so man, +when he walks, turns, raises, drags, works with his fingers, with +his eyes, with his ears, with his tongue, with his +brain,—only then is he satisfied, only then is he a +man.</p> +<p>A man who acknowledges his appointment to labor will naturally +strive towards that rotation of labor which is peculiar to him, +for the satisfaction of his inward requirements; and he can alter +this labor in no other way than when he feels within himself an +irresistible summons to some exclusive form of labor, and when +the demands of other men for that labor are expressed.</p> +<p>The character of labor is such, that the satisfaction of all a +man’s requirements demands that same succession of the +sorts of work which renders work not a burden but a joy. +Only a false creed, δοξα, to the effect +that labor is a curse, could have led men to rid themselves of +certain kinds of work; i.e., to the appropriation of the work of +others, demanding the forced occupation with special labor of +other people, which they call division of labor.</p> +<p>We have only grown used to our false comprehension of the +regulation of labor, because it seems to us that the shoemaker, +the machinist, the writer, or the musician will be better off if +he gets rid of the labor peculiar to man. Where there is no +force exercised over the labor of others, or any false belief in +the joy of idleness, not a single man will get rid of physical +labor, necessary for the satisfaction of his requirements, for +the sake of special work; because special work is not a +privilege, but a sacrifice which man offers to inward pressure +and to his brethren.</p> +<p>The shoemaker in the country, who abandons his wonted labor in +the field, which is so grateful to him, and betakes himself to +his trade, in order to repair or make boots for his neighbors, +always deprives himself of the pleasant toil of the field, simply +because he likes to make boots, because he knows that no one else +can do it so well as he, and that people will be grateful to him +for it; but the desire cannot occur to him, to deprive himself, +for the whole period of his life, of the cheering rotation of +labor.</p> +<p>It is the same with the <i>starosta</i> [village elder], the +machinist, the writer, the learned man. To us, with our +corrupt conception of things, it seems, that if a steward has +been relegated to the position of a peasant by his master, or if +a minister has been sent to the colonies, he has been chastised, +he has been ill-treated. But in reality a benefit has been +conferred on him; that is to say, his special, hard labor has +been changed into a cheerful rotation of labor. In a +naturally constituted society, this is quite otherwise. I +know of one community where the people supported +themselves. One of the members of this society was better +educated than the rest; and they called upon him to read, so that +he was obliged to prepare himself during the day, in order that +he might read in the evening. This he did gladly, feeling +that he was useful to others, and that he was performing a good +deed. But he grew weary of exclusively intellectual work, +and his health suffered from it. The members of the +community took pity on him, and requested him to go to work in +the fields.</p> +<p>For men who regard labor as the substance and the joy of life, +the basis, the foundation of life will always be the struggle +with nature,—labor both agricultural and mechanical, and +intellectual, and the establishment of communion between +men. Departure from one or from many of these varieties of +labor, and the adoption of special labor, will then only occur +when the man possessed of a special branch, and loving this work, +and knowing that he can perform it better than others, sacrifices +his own profit for the satisfaction of the direct demands made +upon him. Only on condition of such a view of labor, and of +the natural division of labor arising from it, is that curse +which is laid upon our idea of labor abrogated, and does every +sort of work becomes always a joy; because a man will either +perform that labor which is undoubtedly useful and joyous, and +not dull, or he will possess the consciousness of self-abnegation +in the fulfilment of more difficult and restricted toil, which he +exercises for the good of others.</p> +<p>But the division of labor is more profitable. More +profitable for whom? It is more profitable in making the +greatest possible quantity of calico, and boots in the shortest +possible time. But who will make these boots and this +calico? There are people who, for whole generations, make +only the heads of pins. Then how can this be more +profitable for men? If the point lies in manufacturing as +much calico and as many pins as possible, then this is so. +But the point concerns men and their welfare. And the +welfare of men lies in life. And life is work. How, +then, can the necessity for burdensome, oppressive toil be more +profitable for people? For all men, that one thing is more +profitable which I desire for myself,—the utmost +well-being, and the gratification of all those requirements, both +bodily and spiritual, of the conscience and of the reason, which +are imposed upon me. And in my own case I have found, that +for my own welfare, and for the satisfaction of these needs of +mine, all that I require is to cure myself of that folly in which +I had been living, in company with the Krapivensky madman, and +which consisted in presupposing that some people need not work, +and that certain other people should direct all this, and that I +should therefore do only that which is natural to man, i.e., +labor for the satisfaction of their requirements; and, having +discovered this, I convinced myself that labor for the +satisfaction of one’s own needs falls of itself into +various kinds of labor, each one of which possesses its own +charm, and which not only do not constitute a burden, but which +serve as a respite to one another. I have made a rough +division of this labor (not insisting on the justice of this +arrangement), in accordance with my own needs in life, into four +parts, corresponding to the four stints of labor of which the day +is composed; and I seek in this manner to satisfy my +requirements.</p> +<p>These, then, are the answers which I have found for myself to +the question, “What is to be done?”</p> +<p><i>First</i>, Not to lie to myself, however far removed my +path in life may be from the true path which my reason discloses +to me.</p> +<p><i>Second</i>, To renounce my consciousness of my own +righteousness, my superiority especially over other people; and +to acknowledge my guilt.</p> +<p><i>Third</i>, To comply with that eternal and indubitable law +of humanity,—the labor of my whole being, feeling no shame +at any sort of work; to contend with nature for the maintenance +of my own life and the lives of others.</p> +<h2>Footnotes:</h2> +<p><a name="footnote169"></a><a href="#citation169" +class="footnote">[169]</a> An omission by the censor, which +I am unable to supply. <span +class="smcap">Trans.</span></p> +<p><a name="footnote178"></a><a href="#citation178" +class="footnote">[178]</a> We designate as organisms the +elephant and the bacterian, only because we assume by analogy in +those creatures the same conjunction of feeling and consciousness +that we know to exist in ourselves. But in human societies +and in humanity, this actual sign is absent; and therefore, +however many other signs we may discover in humanity and in +organism, without this substantial token the recognition of +humanity as an organism is incorrect.</p> +<p><a name="footnote238"></a><a href="#citation238" +class="footnote">[238]</a> <i>v prikusku</i>, when a lump +of sugar is held in the teeth instead or being put into the +tea.</p> +<p>***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SCIENCE AND +ART***</p> +<pre> + + +***** This file should be named 3631-h.htm or 3631-h.zip****** + + +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/3/6/3/3631 + + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://www.gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://www.gutenberg.org/about/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: +http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + +</pre></body> +</html> |