diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:04:46 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:04:46 -0700 |
| commit | d9d2466e1880ae48cce38fc6631ac8f9e1f1fae1 (patch) | |
| tree | 9f8319ceb60ec0ecd24c2aa8d1acc54be81ba7aa /35916-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '35916-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/35916-h.htm | 20137 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo009.png | bin | 0 -> 94390 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo033.png | bin | 0 -> 40609 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo034.png | bin | 0 -> 38075 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo035.png | bin | 0 -> 32025 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo041.png | bin | 0 -> 31782 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo042.png | bin | 0 -> 16689 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo044.png | bin | 0 -> 81939 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo047.png | bin | 0 -> 96622 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo048.png | bin | 0 -> 54171 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo049a.png | bin | 0 -> 16157 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo049b.png | bin | 0 -> 59148 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo053.png | bin | 0 -> 11160 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo058.png | bin | 0 -> 86817 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo061.png | bin | 0 -> 29898 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo062.png | bin | 0 -> 47569 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo064.png | bin | 0 -> 81374 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo069.png | bin | 0 -> 34290 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo070.png | bin | 0 -> 40761 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo073.png | bin | 0 -> 83592 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo075.png | bin | 0 -> 64467 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo077.png | bin | 0 -> 11935 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo080.png | bin | 0 -> 79750 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo081.png | bin | 0 -> 15234 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo086.png | bin | 0 -> 73517 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo090.png | bin | 0 -> 75703 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo092.png | bin | 0 -> 98187 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo094.png | bin | 0 -> 41002 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo100.png | bin | 0 -> 59397 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo105.png | bin | 0 -> 28910 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo107.png | bin | 0 -> 77535 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo111.png | bin | 0 -> 40293 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo116.png | bin | 0 -> 32482 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo121.png | bin | 0 -> 84557 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo125.png | bin | 0 -> 69918 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo131.png | bin | 0 -> 90136 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo135.png | bin | 0 -> 45362 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo142.png | bin | 0 -> 29507 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo144.png | bin | 0 -> 24470 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo146.png | bin | 0 -> 80874 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo148.png | bin | 0 -> 76424 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo149.png | bin | 0 -> 65694 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo150.png | bin | 0 -> 27083 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo156.png | bin | 0 -> 96566 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo159.png | bin | 0 -> 99603 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo161.png | bin | 0 -> 39693 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo163.png | bin | 0 -> 90573 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo166.png | bin | 0 -> 49573 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo168.png | bin | 0 -> 52928 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo170.png | bin | 0 -> 23896 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo171.png | bin | 0 -> 68249 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo175.png | bin | 0 -> 67523 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo176.png | bin | 0 -> 25646 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo177.png | bin | 0 -> 54297 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo178.png | bin | 0 -> 51312 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo180.png | bin | 0 -> 45562 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo181.png | bin | 0 -> 80463 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo183.png | bin | 0 -> 91441 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo184.png | bin | 0 -> 72115 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo190.png | bin | 0 -> 55317 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo195.png | bin | 0 -> 27292 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo201.png | bin | 0 -> 71140 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo202.png | bin | 0 -> 47291 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo205.png | bin | 0 -> 79677 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo210.png | bin | 0 -> 69737 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo214.png | bin | 0 -> 65703 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo218.png | bin | 0 -> 70413 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo219.png | bin | 0 -> 58573 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo224.png | bin | 0 -> 58381 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo225.png | bin | 0 -> 82097 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo229.png | bin | 0 -> 95413 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo231.png | bin | 0 -> 69207 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo233.png | bin | 0 -> 47968 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo237.png | bin | 0 -> 63218 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo238.png | bin | 0 -> 55971 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo239.png | bin | 0 -> 53707 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo240.png | bin | 0 -> 51983 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo242.png | bin | 0 -> 24150 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo243.png | bin | 0 -> 35288 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo244.png | bin | 0 -> 29828 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo247.png | bin | 0 -> 22408 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo253.png | bin | 0 -> 79185 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo263.png | bin | 0 -> 25908 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo265a.png | bin | 0 -> 69709 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo265b.png | bin | 0 -> 98327 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo266.png | bin | 0 -> 90652 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo267.png | bin | 0 -> 92902 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo269.png | bin | 0 -> 101236 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo272a.png | bin | 0 -> 24036 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo272b.png | bin | 0 -> 13611 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo274.png | bin | 0 -> 14895 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo275.png | bin | 0 -> 83651 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo278.png | bin | 0 -> 86710 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo280.png | bin | 0 -> 53316 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo281.png | bin | 0 -> 73486 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo283.png | bin | 0 -> 59316 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo285a.png | bin | 0 -> 78324 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo285b.png | bin | 0 -> 62738 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo289.png | bin | 0 -> 154682 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo291.png | bin | 0 -> 21299 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo292a.png | bin | 0 -> 68588 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo292b.png | bin | 0 -> 51564 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo296.png | bin | 0 -> 50927 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo297.png | bin | 0 -> 86787 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo299.png | bin | 0 -> 47644 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo301.png | bin | 0 -> 100069 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo302.png | bin | 0 -> 37102 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo303.png | bin | 0 -> 15031 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo317.png | bin | 0 -> 85303 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo318.png | bin | 0 -> 88015 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo329.png | bin | 0 -> 27577 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo335.png | bin | 0 -> 55656 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo336.png | bin | 0 -> 50515 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo339.png | bin | 0 -> 93500 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo340.png | bin | 0 -> 98354 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo346.png | bin | 0 -> 93892 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo347.png | bin | 0 -> 78721 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo348.png | bin | 0 -> 70952 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo349.png | bin | 0 -> 51995 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo356.png | bin | 0 -> 70285 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo358.png | bin | 0 -> 50714 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo360.png | bin | 0 -> 100627 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo361.png | bin | 0 -> 100076 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo362.png | bin | 0 -> 95344 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo363.png | bin | 0 -> 98193 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo364.png | bin | 0 -> 48373 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo368.png | bin | 0 -> 93443 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo369.png | bin | 0 -> 46215 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo370.png | bin | 0 -> 22275 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo372.png | bin | 0 -> 57227 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo373.png | bin | 0 -> 100179 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo374.png | bin | 0 -> 82475 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo375.png | bin | 0 -> 91391 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo376.png | bin | 0 -> 42361 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo381.png | bin | 0 -> 93505 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo382.png | bin | 0 -> 96693 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo383.png | bin | 0 -> 50268 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo384.png | bin | 0 -> 83834 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo388.png | bin | 0 -> 87273 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo390.png | bin | 0 -> 64548 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo391.png | bin | 0 -> 98293 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo392.png | bin | 0 -> 50778 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo393.png | bin | 0 -> 50460 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo396.png | bin | 0 -> 81405 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo397.png | bin | 0 -> 72408 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo398.png | bin | 0 -> 59641 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo399.png | bin | 0 -> 63827 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo401.png | bin | 0 -> 100495 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo407.png | bin | 0 -> 89216 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo408.png | bin | 0 -> 41870 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo410.png | bin | 0 -> 89032 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo411.png | bin | 0 -> 96035 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo413.png | bin | 0 -> 96050 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo414.png | bin | 0 -> 74748 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo416.png | bin | 0 -> 85439 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo417.png | bin | 0 -> 83766 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo418.png | bin | 0 -> 96933 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo420.png | bin | 0 -> 75527 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo427.png | bin | 0 -> 37429 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo428a.png | bin | 0 -> 38073 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo428b.png | bin | 0 -> 25489 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo430.png | bin | 0 -> 61100 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo431.png | bin | 0 -> 37937 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo434.png | bin | 0 -> 95852 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo437.png | bin | 0 -> 97686 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo442.png | bin | 0 -> 92057 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo443.png | bin | 0 -> 96890 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo445.png | bin | 0 -> 21411 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo461.png | bin | 0 -> 76011 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo466.png | bin | 0 -> 73918 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo470.png | bin | 0 -> 91848 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illo508.png | bin | 0 -> 31481 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/illocover.jpg | bin | 0 -> 49911 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/large092.jpg | bin | 0 -> 242095 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/large166.png | bin | 0 -> 444287 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/large190.png | bin | 0 -> 245936 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 35916-h/images/large361.png | bin | 0 -> 370399 bytes |
177 files changed, 20137 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/35916-h/35916-h.htm b/35916-h/35916-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d02aaee --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/35916-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,20137 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of A History of the Growth of the Steam-Engine, by Robert H. Thurston. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + + p { margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; + } + h1,h2,h3,h4 {text-align: center; clear: both;} + hr {width: 33%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; clear: both;} + + table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border-collapse: collapse; padding-top: .5em; padding-bottom: .5em;} + + body {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;} + + .blockquot {margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: .9em;} + .bb {border-bottom: solid 1px;} + .bt {border-top: solid 1px;} + .br {border-right: solid 1px;} + .bbox {border: solid 2px; padding: 2em;} + .bot {vertical-align: bottom;} + .center {text-align: center;} + + .caption {font-weight: bold; text-align: center; font-size: .9em;} + .colleft {float: left; padding: 0; clear: left; width: 50%;} + .denom {vertical-align: bottom; font-size: .7em;} + .enum {vertical-align: top; font-size: .7em;} + .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center; padding-top: .5em; padding-bottom: .5em;} + + .figleft {float: left; clear: left; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: + 0; margin-right: 1em; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .figright {float: right; clear: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0; + margin-top: 0; margin-right: 0; padding: 0; text-align: center;} + + .footnote {margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%; font-size: 0.8em;} + .footnote .label {text-align: right;} + .fnanchor {vertical-align: top; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;} + .fsize80 {font-size: .8em;} + .fsize125 {font-size: 1.25em;} + .fsize150 {font-size: 1.5em;} + .fsize180 {font-size: 1.8em;} + .formula {text-align: center; line-height: .75em;} + .gesp {letter-spacing: .2em;} + hr.c05 {text-align: center; width: 5%; margin: .5em auto .5em auto; color: gray;} + hr.c25 {text-align: center; width: 25%; margin: .5em auto .5em auto; color: gray;} + hr.c40 {text-align: center; width: 40%; margin: .5em auto .5em auto; color: gray;} + hr.l05 {text-align: left; width: 5%; margin: .5em auto 0 5%; color: gray;} + .just {text-align: justify;} + .ind10 {margin-left: 10%;} + .ind20 {margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%;} + .ind25 {margin-left: 25%; margin-right: 25%;} + .left {text-align: left;} + .notebox {border: solid 2px; padding: 1em; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; background: #CCCCB2;} + .pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%; font-size: .9em; text-align: right; color: gray;} + .poem {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; text-align: left;} + .poem br {display: none;} + .poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;} + .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: .5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .right {text-align: right;} + .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} + .sub {vertical-align: sub; font-size: .7em;} + .tab50 {margin-left: 25%; margin-right: 25%;} + td.padl0 {padding-left: 0;} + td.padl1 {padding-left: .5em;} + td.padr0 {padding-right: 0;} + td.padr1 {padding-right: .5em;} + td.padr2 {padding-right: 1em;} + td.padr4 {padding-right: 2em;} + td.padr6 {padding-right: 3em;} + td.padr8 {padding-right: 4em;} + td.lr05 {text-align: left; padding-right: 5em;} + .top {vertical-align: top;} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of A History of the Growth of the Steam-Engine, by +Robert H. Thurston + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: A History of the Growth of the Steam-Engine + +Author: Robert H. Thurston + +Release Date: April 19, 2011 [EBook #35916] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK STEAM *** + + + + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Harry Lamé and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive) + + + + + + +</pre> + + +<hr class="c40" /> +<div class="notebox"> +<p class="center"><b>Transcriber's Notes:</b></p> +<p>Some minor typographical errors have been corrected. Where necessary, illustrations have been edited to include +the reference letters used in the text or to increase their visibility.</p> +<p>Full notes can be found <a href="#TNotes">here</a>.</p> +</div> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/illocover.jpg" alt="Cover" /></div> + +<hr class="c40" /> +<div class="ind20"> +<h2>THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SERIES.</h2> + +<h2>VOLUME XXIV.</h2> +<hr class="c40" /> +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_01" id="Page_01">[1]</a></span> + +<div class="bbox"> +<h3>THE</h3> +<h2>INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SERIES.</h2> +<hr class="c05" /> +<p class="center smcap">Each book complete in One Volume, 12mo, and bound in Cloth.</p> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>1. FORMS OF WATER: A Familiar Exposition of the Origin and Phenomena +of Glaciers. By <span class="smcap">J. Tyndall</span>, LL. D., F. R. S. With 25 +Illustrations. $1.50.</p> + +<p>2. <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4350">PHYSICS AND POLITICS; Or, Thoughts on the Application of the +Principles of “Natural Selection” and “Inheritance” to Political +Society</a>. By <span class="smcap">Walter Bagehot</span>. $1.50.</p> + +<p>3. FOODS. By <span class="smcap">Edward Smith</span>, M. D., LL. B., F. R. S. With numerous +Illustrations. $1.75.</p> + +<p>4. MIND AND BODY: The Theories of their Relation. By <span class="smcap">Alexander +Bain</span>, LL. D. With 4 Illustrations. $1.50.</p> + +<p>5. THE STUDY OF SOCIOLOGY. By <span class="smcap">Herbert Spencer</span>. $1.50.</p> + +<p>6. THE NEW CHEMISTRY. By Professor <span class="smcap">J. P. Cooke</span>, of Harvard +University. With 31 Illustrations. $2.00.</p> + +<p>7. ON THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. By <span class="smcap">Balfour Stewart</span>, +M. A., LL. D., F. R. S. With 14 Illustrations. $1.50.</p> + +<p>8. ANIMAL LOCOMOTION; or, Walking, Swimming, and Flying. By +<span class="smcap">J. B. Pettigrew</span>, M. D., F. R. S., etc. With 130 Illustrations. $1.75.</p> + +<p>9. RESPONSIBILITY IN MENTAL DISEASE. By <span class="smcap">Henry Maudsley</span>, M. D. $1.50.</p> + +<p>10. THE SCIENCE OF LAW. By Professor <span class="smcap">Sheldon Amos</span>. $1.75.</p> + +<p>11. ANIMAL MECHANISM: A Treatise on Terrestrial and Aërial Locomotion. +By Professor <span class="smcap">E. J. Marey</span>. With 117 Illustrations. $1.75.</p> + +<p>12. <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1185">THE HISTORY OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN RELIGION +AND SCIENCE</a>. By <span class="smcap">J. W. Draper</span>, M. D., LL. D. $1.75.</p> + +<p>13. THE DOCTRINE OF DESCENT AND DARWINISM. By Professor +<span class="smcap">Oscar Schmidt</span> (Strasburg University). With 26 Illustrations. +$1.50.</p> + +<p>14. THE CHEMICAL EFFECTS OF LIGHT AND PHOTOGRAPHY. +By Dr. <span class="smcap">Hermann Vogel</span> (Polytechnic Academy of Berlin). Translation +thoroughly revised. With 100 Illustrations. $2.00.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_02" id="Page_02">[2]</a></span> +15. <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/30181">FUNGI: Their Nature, Influences, Uses, etc</a>. +By <span class="smcap">M. C. Cooke</span>, M. A., +LL. D. Edited by the Rev. M. J. Berkeley, M. A., F. L. S. With +109 Illustrations. $1.50.</p> + +<p>16. THE LIFE AND GROWTH OF LANGUAGE. By Professor +<span class="smcap">William Dwight Whitney</span>, of Yale College. $1.50.</p> + +<p>17. MONEY AND THE MECHANISM OF EXCHANGE. By <span class="smcap">W. +Stanley Jevons</span>, M. A., F. R. S. $1.75.</p> + +<p>18. THE NATURE OF LIGHT, with a General Account of Physical +Optics. By Dr. <span class="smcap">Eugene Lommel</span>. With 188 Illustrations and a +Table of Spectra in Chromo-lithography. $2.00.</p> + +<p>19. ANIMAL PARASITES AND MESSMATES. By Monsieur <span class="smcap">Van +Beneden</span>. With 83 Illustrations. $1.50.</p> + +<p>20. FERMENTATION. By Professor <span class="smcap">Schützenberger</span>. With 28 Illustrations. +$1.50.</p> + +<p>21. THE FIVE SENSES OF MAN. By Professor <span class="smcap">Bernstein</span>. With 91 +Illustrations. $1.75.</p> + +<p>22. THE THEORY OF SOUND IN ITS RELATION TO MUSIC. By +Professor <span class="smcap">Pietro Blaserna</span>. With numerous Illustrations. $1.50.</p> + +<p>23. STUDIES IN SPECTRUM ANALYSIS. By <span class="smcap">J. Norman Lockyer</span>, +F. R. S. With 6 Photographic Illustrations of Spectra, and numerous +Engravings on Wood. $2.50.</p> + +<p>24. A HISTORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE STEAM-ENGINE. +By Professor <span class="smcap">E. H. Thurston</span>. With 163 Illustrations. $2.50.</p> + +<p>25. EDUCATION AS A SCIENCE. By <span class="smcap">Alexander Bain</span>, LL. D. +$1.75.</p> + +<p>26. STUDENTS’ TEXT-BOOK OF COLOR; Or, Modern Chromatics. +With Applications to Art and Industry. By Professor <span class="smcap">Ogden N. +Rood</span>, Columbia College. New edition. With 130 Illustrations. +$2.00.</p> + +<p>27. THE HUMAN SPECIES. By Professor <span class="smcap">A. de Quatrefages</span>, Membre +de l’Institut. $2.00.</p> + +<p>28. THE CRAYFISH: An Introduction to the Study of Zoology. By <span class="smcap">T. +H. Huxley</span>, F. R. S. With 82 Illustrations. $1.75.</p> + +<p>29. THE ATOMIC THEORY. By Professor <span class="smcap">A. Wurtz</span>. Translated by +E. Cleminshaw, F. C. S. $1.50.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_03" id="Page_03">[3]</a></span> +30. ANIMAL LIFE AS AFFECTED BY THE NATURAL CONDITIONS +OF EXISTENCE. By <span class="smcap">Karl Semper</span>. With 2 Maps and +106 Woodcuts. $2.00.</p> + +<p>31. SIGHT: An Exposition of the Principles of Monocular and Binocular +Vision. By <span class="smcap">Joseph Le Conte</span>, LL. D. With 132 Illustrations. +$1.50.</p> + +<p>32. GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF MUSCLES AND NERVES. By +Professor <span class="smcap">J. Rosenthal</span>. With 75 Illustrations. $1.50.</p> + +<p>33. <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17815">ILLUSIONS: A Psychological Study</a>. +By <span class="smcap">James Sully</span>. $1.50.</p> + +<p>34. THE SUN. By <span class="smcap">C. A. Young</span>, Professor of Astronomy in the College +of New Jersey. With numerous Illustrations. $2.00.</p> + +<p>35. VOLCANOES: What they Are and what they Teach. By <span class="smcap">John W. +Judd</span>, F. R. S., Professor of Geology in the Royal School of Mines. +With 96 Illustrations. $2.00.</p> + +<p>36. SUICIDE: An Essay in Comparative Moral Statistics. By <span class="smcap">Henry +Morselli</span>, M. D., Professor of Psychological Medicine, Royal University, +Turin. $1.75.</p> + +<p>37. <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2355">THE FORMATION OF VEGETABLE MOULD, THROUGH THE +ACTION OF WORMS. With Observations on their Habits</a>. By +<span class="smcap">Charles Darwin</span>, LL. D., F. R. S. With Illustrations. $1.50.</p> + +<p>38. THE CONCEPTS AND THEORIES OF MODERN PHYSICS. By +<span class="smcap">J. B. Stallo</span>. $1.75.</p> + +<p>39. THE BRAIN AND ITS FUNCTIONS. By <span class="smcap">J. Luys</span>. $1.50.</p> + +<p>40. <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17802">MYTH AND SCIENCE</a>. By <span class="smcap">Tito Vignoli</span>. $1.50.</p> + +<p>41. DISEASES OF MEMORY: An Essay in the Positive Psychology. +By <span class="smcap">Th. Ribot</span>, author of “Heredity.” $1.50.</p> + +<p>42. ANTS, BEES, AND WASPS. A Record of Observations of the +Habits of the Social Hymenoptera. By Sir <span class="smcap">John Lubbock</span>, Bart., +F. R. S., D. C. L., LL. D., etc. $2.00.</p> + +<p>43. SCIENCE OF POLITICS. By <span class="smcap">Sheldon Amos</span>. $1.75.</p> + +<p>44. ANIMAL INTELLIGENCE. By <span class="smcap">George J. Romanes</span>. $1.75.</p> + +<p>45. MAN BEFORE METALS. By <span class="smcap">N. Joly</span>, Correspondent of the Institute. +With 148 Illustrations. $1.75.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_04" id="Page_04">[4]</a></span>46. THE ORGANS OF SPEECH AND THEIR APPLICATION IN +THE FORMATION OF ARTICULATE SOUNDS. By <span class="smcap">G. H. +von Meyer</span>, Professor in Ordinary of Anatomy at the University of +Zürich. With 47 Woodcuts. $1.75.</p> + +<p>47. FALLACIES: A View of Logic from the Practical Side. By <span class="smcap">Alfred +Sidgwick</span>, B. A., Oxon. $1.75.</p> + +<p>48. ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED PLANTS. By <span class="smcap">Alphonse de Candolle</span>. +$2.00.</p> + +<p>49. JELLY-FISH, STAR-FISH, AND SEA-URCHINS. Being a Research +on Primitive Nervous Systems. By <span class="smcap">George J. Romanes</span>. +$1.75.</p> + +<p>50. THE COMMON SENSE OF THE EXACT SCIENCES. By the +late <span class="smcap">William Kingdon Clifford</span>. $1.50.</p> + +<p>51. PHYSICAL EXPRESSION: Its Modes and Principles. By <span class="smcap">Francis +Warner</span>, M. D., Assistant Physician, and Lecturer on Botany to the +London Hospital, etc. With 51 Illustrations. $1.75.</p> + +<p>52. ANTHROPOID APES. By <span class="smcap">Robert Hartmann</span>, Professor in the +University of Berlin. With 63 Illustrations. $1.75.</p> + +<p>53. THE MAMMALIA IN THEIR RELATION TO PRIMEVAL +TIMES. By <span class="smcap">Oscar Schmidt</span>. $1.50.</p> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<p class="center">New York: D. APPLETON & CO., 1, 3, & 5 Bond Street.</p> +<hr class="c40" /> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Frontispiece" id="Frontispiece"></a> +<img src="images/illo009.png" alt="Frontispiece" width="350" height="539" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">The Grecian Idea of the Steam-Engine.</span></p></div> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_i" id="Page_i">[i]</a></p> + +<h3>THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SERIES.</h3> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<h1>A HISTORY</h1> +<h3>OF THE</h3> +<h1>GROWTH OF THE STEAM-ENGINE.</h1> + +<h3>BY</h3> + +<h2>ROBERT H. THURSTON, A. M., C. E.,</h2> + +<p class="center fsize80">PROFESSOR OF ENGINEERING STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PAST PRESIDENT<br /> +AMERICAN SOCIETY MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, MEMBER OF SOCIETY OF CIVIL<br /> +ENGINEERS, SOCIÉTÉ DES INGÉNIEURS CIVILS, VEREIN DEUTSCHE<br /> +INGENIEURE, OESTERREICHISCHER INGENIEUR- UND<br /> +ARCHITEKTEN-VEREIN; ASSOCIATE BRITISH<br /> +INSTITUTION OF NAVAL ARCHITECTS,<br /> +ETC., ETC.</p> + +<p class="center"><i>SECOND REVISED EDITION.</i></p> + +<p class="center">NEW YORK:<br /> +<span class="gesp">D. APPLETON AND COMPANY</span>,<br /> +<span class="fsize80">1, 3, <small>AND</small> 5 BOND STREET.</span><br /> +1886.</p> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_ii" id="Page_ii">[ii]</a></span></p> +<div class="fsize80"> +<h3>COPYRIGHT, 1878, 1884,</h3> +<h2><span class="smcap">By</span> ROBERT H. THURSTON.</h2> +</div> + +<hr class="c40" /> +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_iii" id="Page_iii">[iii]</a></p> + +<h2>PREFACE.</h2> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>This little work embodies the more generally interesting +portions of lectures first written for delivery at the +<span class="smcap">Stevens Institute of Technology</span>, in the winter of 1871-’72, +to a mixed audience, composed, however, principally +of engineers by profession, and of mechanics; it comprises, +also, some material prepared for other occasions.</p> + +<p>These lectures have been rewritten and considerably +extended, and have been given a form which is more appropriate +to this method of presentation of the subject. +The account of the gradual development of the philosophy +of the steam-engine has been extended and considerably +changed, both in arrangement and in method. That +part in which the direction of improvement during the +past history of the steam-engine, the course which it is +to-day taking, and the direction and limitation of that +improvement in the future, are traced, has been somewhat +modified to accord with the character of the revised work.</p> + +<p>The author has consulted a large number of authors +in the course of his work, and is very greatly indebted +to several earlier writers. Of these, Stuart<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" +class="fnanchor">[1]</a> is entitled<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_iv" id="Page_iv">[iv]</a></span> +to particular mention. His “History” is the earliest +deserving the name; and his “Anecdotes” are of exceedingly +great interest and of equally great historical +value. The artistic and curious little sketches at the end +of each chapter are from John Stuart, as are, usually, +the drawings of the older forms of engines.</p> + +<p>Greenwood’s excellent translation of Hero, as edited +by Bennett Woodcroft (London, 1851), can be consulted +by those who are curious to learn more of that interesting +old Greek treatise.</p> + +<p>Some valuable matter is from Farey,<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" +class="fnanchor">[2]</a> who gives the +most extended account extant of Newcomen’s and Watt’s +engines. The reader who desires to know more of the +life of Worcester, and more of the details of his work, +will find in the very complete biography of Dircks<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" +class="fnanchor">[3]</a> all +that he can wish to learn of that great but unfortunate +inventor. Smiles’s admirably written biography of Watt<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" +class="fnanchor">[4]</a> +gives an equally interesting and complete account of the +great mechanic and of his partners; and Muirhead<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" +class="fnanchor">[5]</a> furnishes +us with a still more detailed account of his inventions.</p> + +<p>For an account of the life and work of John Elder, +the great pioneer in the introduction of the now standard<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[v]</a></span> +double-cylinder, or “compound,” engine, the student can +consult a little biographical sketch by Prof. Rankine, +published soon after the death of Elder.</p> + +<p>The only published sketch of the history of the science +of thermo-dynamics, which plays so large a part of the philosophy +of the steam-engine, is that of Prof. Tait—a most +valuable monograph.</p> + +<p>The section of this work which treats of the causes +and the extent of losses of heat in the steam-engine, and +of the methods available, or possibly available, to reduce +the amount of this now immense waste of heat, is, in some +respects, quite new, and is equally novel in the method of +its presentation. The portraits with which the book +is well furnished are believed to be authentic, and, it +is hoped, will lend interest, if not adding to the real +value of the work.</p> + +<p>Among other works which have been of great assistance +to the author, and will be found, perhaps, equally +valuable to some of the readers of this little treatise, +are several to which reference has not been made in +the text. Among them the following are deserving of +special mention: Zeuner’s “Wärmetheorie,” the treatises +of Stewart and of Maxwell, and McCulloch’s “Mechanical +Theory of Heat,” a short but thoroughly logical +and exact mathematical treatise; Cotterill’s “Steam-Engine +considered as a Heat-Engine,” a more extended +work on the same subject, which will be found an excellent +companion to, and commentary upon, Rankine’s +“Steam-Engine and Prime Movers,” which is the standard<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[vi]</a></span> +treatise on the theory of the steam-engine. The +works of Bourne, of Holley, of Clarke, and of Forney, +are standards on the practical every-day matters of +steam-engine construction and management.</p> + +<p>The author is almost daily in receipt of inquiries +which indicate that the above remarks will be of service +to very many young engineers, as well as to many to +whom the steam-engine is of interest from a more purely +scientific point of view.</p> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> +“History of the Steam-Engine,” London, 1824. “Anecdotes of the +Steam-Engine,” London, 1829.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> +“Treatise on the Steam-Engine,” London, 1827.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> +“Life, Times, and Scientific Labors of the Second Marquis of Worcester,” +London, 1865.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> +“Lives of Boulton and Watt,” London, 1865.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> +“Life of James Watt,” D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1859. “Mechanical +Inventions of James Watt,” London, 1854.</p></div> + +<hr class="l05" /> + +<p> </p> + +<hr class="c40" /><p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[vii]</a></p> +<h2>CONTENTS.</h2> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<table width="70%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1" summary="ToC"> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="center"><a href="#CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I.</a></td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center smcap">The Steam-Engine as a Simple Machine.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right fsize80" colspan="3">PAGE</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="just smcap">Section I.—The Period of Speculation—From Hero to Worcester, b. c. 200 to +a. d. 1650</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td style="text-align: justify;">Introduction—the Importance of the Steam-Engine, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>; Hero and his Treatise +on Pneumatics, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>; Hero’s Engines, <span class="smcap">b. c.</span> 200, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>; +William of Malmesbury on Steam, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1150, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>; Hieronymus Cardan on Steam and the +Vacuum, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>; Malthesius on the Power of Steam, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1571, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>; +Jacob Besson on the Generation of Steam, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1578, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>; Ramelli’s Work on +Machines, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1588, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>; Leonardo da Vinci on the Steam-Gun, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>; +Blasco de Garay’s Steamer, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1543, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>; Battista della Porta’s +Steam-Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1601, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>; Florence Rivault on the Force of Steam, +<span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1608, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>; Solomon de Caus’s Apparatus, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1615, +<a href="#Page_16">16</a>; Giovanni Branca’s Steam-Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1629, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>; +David Ramseye’s Inventions, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1630, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>; Bishop John Wilkins’s Schemes, +<span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1648, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>; Kircher’s Apparatus, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="just smcap">Section II.—The Period of Application—Worcester, Papin, and Savery</td> +<td class="bot right"><a href="#Page_19">19</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">Edward Somerset, Marquis of Worcester, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1663, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>; +Worcester’s Steam Pumping-Engines, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>; Jean Hautefeuille’s Alcohol and Gunpowder Engines, +<span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1678, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>; Huyghens’s Gunpowder-Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1680, +<a href="#Page_25">25</a>; Invention in Great Britain, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>; Sir Samuel Morland, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> +1683, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>; Thomas Savery and his Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1698, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>; +Desaguliers’s Savery Engines, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1718, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>; Denys Papin and his Work, +<span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1675, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>; Papin’s Engines, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1685-1695, +<a href="#Page_50">50</a>; Papin’s Steam-Boilers, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center"><a href="#CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="smcap center" colspan="3">The Steam-Engine as a Train of Mechanism.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="smcap just">The Modern Type as developed by Newcomen, Beighton, and Smeaton</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_55">55</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">Defects of the Savery Engine, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>; Thomas Newcomen, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1705, +<a href="#Page_57">57</a>; the Newcomen Steam Pumping-Engine, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>; Advantages of Newcomen’s Engine, +<a href="#Page_60">60</a>; Potter’s and Beighton’s Improvements, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1713-’18, +<a href="#Page_61">61</a>; Smeaton’s Newcomen Engines, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1775, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>; Operation +of the Newcomen Engine, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>; Power and Economy of the Engine, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>; Introduction of the +Newcomen Engine, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center"><a href="#CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III.</a><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[viii]</a></span></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center smcap">The Development of the Modern Steam-Engine. James Watt and his Contemporaries.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="smcap just">Section I.—James Watt and his Inventions</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_79">79</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">James Watt, his Birth and Parentage, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>; his Standing in School, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>; he +learns his Trade in London, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>; Return to Scotland and Settlement in Glasgow, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>; the +Newcomen Engine Model, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>; Discovery of Latent Heat, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>; Sources of Loss in the Newcomen +Engine, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>; Facts experimentally determined by Watt, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>; Invention of the Separate Condenser, +<a href="#Page_87">87</a>; the Steam-Jacket and other Improvements, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>; Connection with Dr. Roebuck, +<a href="#Page_91">91</a>; Watt meets Boulton, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>; Matthew Boulton, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>; Boulton’s +Establishment at Soho, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>; the Partnership of Boulton and Watt, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>; the Kinneil Engine, +<a href="#Page_97">97</a>; Watt’s Patent of 1769, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>; Work of Boulton and Watt, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>; +the Rotative Engine, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>; the Patent of 1781, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>; the Expansion of Steam—its +Economy, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>; the Double-Acting Engine, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>; the “Compound” Engine, +<a href="#Page_110">110</a>; the Steam-Hammer, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>; Parallel Motions, the Counter, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>; the +Throttle-Valve and Governor, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>; Steam, Vacuum, and Water Gauges, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>; Boulton & +Watt’s Mill-Engine, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>; the Albion Mill and its Engine, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>; the Steam-Engine +Indicator, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>; Watt in Social Life, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>; Discovery of the Composition of Water, +<a href="#Page_126">126</a>; Death of James Watt, <a href="#Page_128">128</a>; Memorials and Souvenirs, <a href="#Page_128">128</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="smcap just">Section II.—The Contemporaries of James Watt</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_132">132</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">William Murdoch and his Work, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>; Invention of Gas-Lighting, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>; +Jonathan Hornblower and the Compound Engine, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>; Causes of the Failure of Hornblower, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>; +William Bull and Richard Trevithick, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>; Edward Cartwright and his Engine, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center"><a href="#CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center smcap">The Modern Steam-Engine.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="smcap just">The Second Period of Application—1800-1850—Steam-Locomotion on Railroads</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_144">144</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">Introduction, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>; the Non-Condensing Engine and the Locomotive, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>; +Newton’s Locomotive, 1680, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>; Nathan Read’s Steam-Carriage, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>; +Cugnot’s Steam-Carriage, 1769, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>; the Model Steam-Carriage of Watt and Murdoch, 1784, <a +href="#Page_153">153</a>; Oliver Evans and his Plans, 1786, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>; Evans’s Oruktor Amphibolis, 1804, +<a href="#Page_157">157</a>; Richard Trevithick’s Steam-Carriage, 1802, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>; Steam-Carriages of Griffiths +and others, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>; Steam-Carriages of Goldsworthy Gurney, 1827, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>; Steam-Carriages of +Walter Hancock, 1831, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>; Reports to the House of Commons, 1831, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>; the Introduction of +the Railroad, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>; Richard Trevithick’s Locomotives, 1804, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>; John Stevens and the +Railroad, 1812, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>; William Hedley’s Locomotives, 1812, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>; George Stephenson, +<a href="#Page_183">183</a>; Stephenson’s Killingworth Engine, 1813, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>; Stephenson’s Second +Locomotive, 1815, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>; Stephenson’s Safety-Lamp, 1815, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>; Robert Stephenson & +Co., 1824, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>; the Stockton & Darlington Engine, 1825, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>; the Liverpool & +Manchester Railroad, 1826, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>; Trial of Competing Engines at Rainhill, 1829, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>; the +Rocket and the Novelty, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>; Atmospheric Railways, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>; Character of George +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">[ix]</a></span>Stephenson, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>; the Locomotive of 1833, +<a href="#Page_204">204</a>; Introduction of Railroads in Europe, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>; Introduction of Railroads in the United +States, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>; John Stevens’s Experimental Railroad, 1825, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>; Horatio Allen and the +“Stourbridge Lion,” 1829, <a href="#Page_208">208</a>; Peter Cooper’s Engine, 1829, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>; E. L. +Miller and the S. C. Railroad, 1830, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>; the “American” Type of Engine of John B. Jervis, 1832, +<a href="#Page_212">212</a>; Robert L. Stevens and the T-rail, 1830, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>; Matthias W. Baldwin and his Engine, 1831, +<a href="#Page_215">215</a>; Robert Stephenson on the Growth of the Locomotive, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center"><a href="#CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center smcap">The Modern Steam-Engine.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="smcap just">The Second Period of Application—1800-1850 (continued)—The Steam-Engine applied +to Ship-Propulsion</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_221">221</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">Introduction, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>; Ancient Prophecies, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>; the Earliest Paddle-Wheel, +<a href="#Page_223">223</a>; Blasco de Garay’s Steam-Vessel, 1543, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>; Experiments of Dionysius Papin, +1707, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>; Jonathan Hulls’s Steamer, 1736, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>; Bernouilli and Gauthier, +<a href="#Page_228">228</a>; William Henry, 1782, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>; the Comte d’Auxiron, 1772, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>; +the Marquis de Jouffroy, 1776, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>; James Rumsey, 1774, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>; John Fitch, 1785, +<a href="#Page_235">235</a>; Fitch’s Experiments on the Delaware, 1787, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>; Fitch’s Experiments +at New York, 1796, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>; the Prophecy of John Fitch, <a href="#Page_241">241</a>; Patrick Miller, 1786-’87, +<a href="#Page_241">241</a>; Samuel Morey, 1793, <a href="#Page_243">243</a>; Nathan Read, 1788, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>; Dundas and +Symmington, 1801, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>; Henry Bell and the Comet, 1811, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>; Nicholas Roosevelt, 1798, +<a href="#Page_250">250</a>; Robert Fulton, 1802, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>; Fulton’s Torpedo-Vessels, 1801, <a +href="#Page_252">252</a>; Fulton’s First Steamboat, 1803, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>; the Clermont, 1807, <a +href="#Page_257">257</a>; Voyage of the Clermont to Albany, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>; Fulton’s Later Steamboats, +<a href="#Page_260">260</a>; Fulton’s War-Steamer Fulton the First, 1815, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>; Oliver Evans, 1804, +<a href="#Page_263">263</a>; John Stevens’s Screw-Steamer, 1804, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>; Stevens’s Steam-Boilers, 1804, +<a href="#Page_264">264</a>; Stevens’s Iron-Clad, 1812, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>; Robert L. Stevens’s Improvements, +<a href="#Page_270">270</a>; the “Stevens Cut-off,” 1841, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>; the Stevens Iron-Clad, 1837, +<a href="#Page_277">277</a>; Robert L. Thurston and John Babcock, 1821, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>; James P. Allaire and the Messrs. +Copeland, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>; Erastus W. Smith’s Compound Engine, <a href="#Page_283">283</a>; Steam-Navigation on Western +Rivers, 1811, <a href="#Page_283">283</a>; Ocean Steam-Navigation, 1808, <a href="#Page_285">285</a>; the Savannah, 1819, +<a href="#Page_286">286</a>; the Sirius and the Great Western, 1838, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>; the Cunard Line, 1840, +<a href="#Page_290">290</a>; the Collins Line, 1851, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>; the Side-Lever Engine, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>; +Introduction of Screw-Steamers, <a href="#Page_293">293</a>; John Ericsson’s Screw-Vessels, 1836, <a href="#Page_294">294</a>; +Francis Pettit Smith, 1837, <a href="#Page_296">296</a>; the Princeton, 1841, <a href="#Page_297">297</a>; Advantages of the Screw, +<a href="#Page_299">299</a>; the Screw on the Ocean, <a href="#Page_300">300</a>; Obstacles to Improvement, <a href="#Page_301">301</a>; +Changes in Engine-Construction, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>; Conclusion, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center"><a href="#CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center smcap">The Steam-Engine of To-Day.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="just smcap">The Period of Refinement—1850 to Date</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_303">303</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">Condition of the Steam-Engine at this Time, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>; the Later Development of the Engine, +<a href="#Page_304">304</a>; Stationary Steam-Engines, <a href="#Page_307">307</a>; the Steam-Engine for Small Powers, +<a href="#Page_307">307</a>; the Horizontal Engine with Meyer Valve-Gear, <a href="#Page_311">311</a>; the Allen Engine, +<a href="#Page_314">314</a>; its Performance, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>; the Detachable Valve-Gear, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>; +the Sickels Cut-off, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>; Expansion adjusted by the Governor, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>; the Corliss Engine, +<a href="#Page_319">319</a>;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">[x]</a></span> the Greene Engine, <a +href="#Page_321">321</a>; Perkins’s Experiments, <a href="#Page_323">323</a>; Dr. Alban’s Work, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>; +the Perkins Compound Engine, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>; the Modern Pumping-Engine, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>; the Cornish Engine, +<a href="#Page_328">328</a>; the Steam-Pump, <a href="#Page_331">331</a>; the Worthington Pumping-Engine, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>; the +Compound Beam and Crank Engine, <a href="#Page_335">335</a>; the Leavitt Pumping-Engine, <a href="#Page_336">336</a>; the Stationary +Steam-Boiler, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>; “Sectional” Steam-Boilers, <a href="#Page_343">343</a>; “Performance” +of Boilers, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="just smcap">Section II.—Portable and Locomotive Engines.</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_347">347</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">The Semi-Portable Engine, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>; Performance of Portable Engines, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>; +their Efficiency, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>; the Hoadley Engine, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>; the Mills Farm and Road Engine, +<a href="#Page_356">356</a>; Fisher’s Steam-Carriage, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>; Performance of Road-Engines, <a +href="#Page_357">357</a>; Trial of Road-Locomotives by the Author, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>; Conclusions, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>; +the Steam Fire-Engine, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>; the Rotary Steam-Engine and Pump, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>; the Modern Locomotive, +<a href="#Page_368">368</a>; Dimensions and Performance, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>; Compound Engines for Locomotives, +<a href="#Page_376">376</a>; Extent of Modern Railroads, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>;</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="just smcap">Section III.—Marine Engines.</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_379">379</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">The Modern Marine Engine, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>; the American Beam Engine, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>; the +Oscillating Engine and Feathering Wheel, <a href="#Page_381">381</a>; the two “Rhode Islands,” <a href="#Page_382">382</a>; +River-Boat Engines on the Mississippi, <a href="#Page_384">384</a>; Steam Launches and Yachts, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>; Marine +Screw-Engines, <a href="#Page_389">389</a>; the Marine Compound Engine, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>; its Introduction by John Elder and +others, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>; Comparison with the Single-Cylinder Engine, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>; its Advantages, <a +href="#Page_396">396</a>; the Surface Condenser, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>; Weight of Machinery, <a href="#Page_398">398</a>; Marine +Engine Performance, <a href="#Page_398">398</a>; Relative Economy of Simple and Compound Engines, <a href="#Page_399">399</a>; the +Screw-Propeller, <a href="#Page_399">399</a>; Chain-Propulsion, or Wire-Rope Towage, <a href="#Page_402">402</a>; Marine Steam-Boilers, +<a href="#Page_403">403</a>; the Modern Steamship, <a href="#Page_405">405</a>; Examples of Merchant Steamers, <a href="#Page_406">406</a>; +Naval Steamers—Classification, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>; Examples of Iron-Clad Steamers, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>; Power of the +Marine Engine, <a href="#Page_415">415</a>; Conclusion, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center"><a href="#CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII.</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center smcap">The Philosophy of the Steam-Engine.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="just smcap">The History of its Growth; Energetics and Thermo-dynamics</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_419">419</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">General Outline, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>; Origin of its Power, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>; Scientific Principles +involved in its Operation, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>; the Beginnings of Modern Science, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>; the Alexandrian +Museum, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>; the Aristotelian Philosophy, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>; the Middle Ages, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>; +Galileo’s Work, <a href="#Page_428">428</a>; Da Vinci and Stevinus, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>; Kepler, Hooke, and Huyghens, +<a href="#Page_429">429</a>; Newton and the New Mechanical Philosophy, <a href="#Page_430">430</a>; the Inception of the Science of +Energetics, <a href="#Page_433">433</a>; the Persistence of Energy, <a href="#Page_433">433</a>; Rumford’s Experiments, +<a href="#Page_434">434</a>; Fourier, Carnot, Seguin, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>; Mayer and the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat, +<a href="#Page_438">438</a>; Joule’s Determination of its Value, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>; Prof. Rankine’s Investigations, +<a href="#Page_442">442</a>; Clausius-Thompson’s Principles, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>; Experimental Work of Boyle, Black, and +Watt, <a href="#Page_446">446</a>; Robison’s, Dalton’s, Ure’s, and Biot’s Study of Pressures and Temperatures of +Steam, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>; Arago’s and Dulong’s Researches, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>; Franklin Institute +Investigation, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>; Cagniard de la Tour—Faraday, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>; Dr. Andrews and the Critical +Point, <a href="#Page_448">448</a>; Donny’s and Dufour’s Researches, <a href="#Page_448">448</a>; Regnault’s +Determination of Temperatures and Pressures of Steam, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>; Hirn’s Experiments, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>; +Résumé of the Philosophy of the Steam-Engine, <a href="#Page_451">451</a>; Energy—Definitions and Principles, +<a href="#Page_451">451</a>; its Measure, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>; the Laws of Energetics, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>; +Thermo-dynamics, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>; its Beginnings, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>; its Laws, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>; +Rankine’s General Equation, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>; Rankine’s Treatise on the Theory of Heat-Engines, +<a href="#Page_456">456</a>; Merits of the Great Philosopher, <a href="#Page_456">456</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center"><a href="#CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII.</a><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xi" id="Page_xi">[xi]</a> +</span></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="center smcap">The Philosophy of the Steam-Engine.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="just smcap">Its Application; its Teachings Respecting the Construction of the Engine +and its Improvement</td> +<td class="right bot"><a href="#Page_457">457</a></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="just">Origin of all Energy, <a href="#Page_457">457</a>; the Progress of Energy through Boiler and Engine, +<a href="#Page_458">458</a>; Conditions of Heat-Development in the Boiler, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>; the Steam in the Engine, +<a href="#Page_458">458</a>; the Expansion of Steam, <a href="#Page_459">459</a>; Conditions of Heat-Utilization, <a +href="#Page_460">460</a>; Loss of Power in the Engine, <a href="#Page_462">462</a>; Conditions affecting the Design of the Steam-Engine, +<a href="#Page_466">466</a>; the Problem stated, <a href="#Page_466">466</a>; Economy as affected by Pressure and Temperature, +<a href="#Page_467">467</a>; Changes which have already occurred, <a href="#Page_468">468</a>; Direction of Changes now in Progress, +<a href="#Page_470">470</a>; Summary of Facts, <a href="#Page_471">471</a>; Characteristics of a Good Steam-Engine, +<a href="#Page_473">473</a>; Principles of Steam-Boiler Construction, <a href="#Page_476">476</a>.</td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3"> </td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<hr class="c40" /><p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xiii" id="Page_xiii">[xiii]</a></p> + +<h2>LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.</h2> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p class="ind25"><span class="smcap"><a href="#Frontispiece">Frontispiece</a></span>: The Grecian Idea of the Steam-Engine.</p> + +<table class="tab50" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" summary="List of Illustrations"> + +<tr> +<td class="right" style="width: 5%;"><span class="fsize80">FIG.</span></td> +<td style="width: 87%;"> </td> +<td class="right" style="width: 8%;"><span class="fsize80">PAGE</span></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">1.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig1">Opening Temple-Doors by Steam, <span class="smcap">b. c.</span> 200</a></td> +<td class="right bot">6</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">2.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig2">Steam Fountain, <span class="smcap">b. c.</span> 200</a></td> +<td class="right bot">7</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">3.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig3">Hero’s Engine, <span class="smcap">b. c.</span> 200</a></td> +<td class="bot right">8</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">4.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig4">Porta’s Apparatus, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1601</a></td> +<td class="bot right">14</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">5.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig5">De Caus’s Apparatus, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1605</a></td> +<td class="bot right">15</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">6.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig6">Branca’s Steam-Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1629</a></td> +<td class="bot right">17</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">7.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig7">Worcester’s Steam-Fountain, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1650</a></td> +<td class="bot right">21</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">8.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig8">Worcester’s Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1665</a></td> +<td class="bot right">22</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">9.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig9">Wall of Raglan Castle</a></td> +<td class="bot right">22</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">10.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig10">Huyghens’s Engine, 1680</a></td> +<td class="bot right">26</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">11.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig11">Savery’s Model, 1698</a></td> +<td class="bot right">34</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">12.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig12">Savery’s Engine, 1698</a></td> +<td class="bot right">35</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">13.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig13">Savery’s Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1702</a></td> +<td class="bot right">37</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">14.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig41">Papin’s Two-Way Cock</a></td> +<td class="bot right">42</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">15.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig15">Engine Built by Desaguliers in 1718</a></td> +<td class="bot right">43</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">16.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig16">Papin’s Digester, 1680</a></td> +<td class="bot right">48</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">17.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig17">Papin’s Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">50</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">18.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig18">Papin’s Engine and Water-Wheel, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1707</a></td> +<td class="bot right">53</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">19.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig19">Newcomen’s Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1705</a></td> +<td class="bot right">59</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">20.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig20">Beighton’s Valve-Gear, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1718</a></td> +<td class="bot right">63</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">21.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig21">Smeaton’s Newcomen Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">65</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">22.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig22">Boiler of Newcomen Engine, 1763</a></td> +<td class="bot right">67</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">23.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig23">Smeaton’s Portable-Engine Boiler, 1765</a></td> +<td class="bot right">73</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">24.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig24">The Newcomen Model</a></td> +<td class="bot right">84</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">25.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig25">Watt’s Experiment</a></td> +<td class="bot right">89</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">26.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig26">Watt’s Engine, 1774</a></td> +<td class="bot right">98</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">27.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig27">Watt’s Engine, 1781</a></td> +<td class="bot right">104</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">28.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xiv" id="Page_xiv">[xiv]</a></span></td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig28">Expansion of Steam</a></td> +<td class="bot right">108</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">29.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig29">The Governor</a></td> +<td class="bot right">115</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">30.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig30">Mercury Steam-Gauge and Glass Water-Gauge</a></td> +<td class="bot right">117</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">31.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig31">Boulton & Watt’s Double-Acting Engine, 1784</a></td> +<td class="bot right">119</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">32.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig32">Valve-Gear of the Albion Mills Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">121</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">33.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig33">Watt’s Half-Trunk Engine, 1784</a></td> +<td class="bot right">122</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">34.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig34">The Watt Hammer, 1784</a></td> +<td class="bot right">123</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">35.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig35">James Watt’s Workshop</a></td> +<td class="bot right">129</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">36.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig36">Murdoch’s Oscillating Engine, 1785</a></td> +<td class="bot right">134</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">37.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig37">Hornblower’s Compound Engine, 1781</a></td> +<td class="bot right">136</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">38.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig38">Bull’s Pumping-Engine, 1798</a></td> +<td class="bot right">139</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">39.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig39">Cartwright’s Engine, 1798</a></td> +<td class="bot right">141</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">40.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig40">The First Railroad-Car, 1825</a></td> +<td class="bot right">144</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">41.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig41">Leupold’s Engine, 1720</a></td> +<td class="bot right">148</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">42.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig42">Newton’s Steam-Carriage, 1680</a></td> +<td class="bot right">149</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">43.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig43">Read’s Steam-Carriage, 1790</a></td> +<td class="bot right">150</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">44.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig44">Cugnot’s Steam-Carriage, 1770</a></td> +<td class="bot right">151</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">45.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig45">Murdoch’s Model, 1784</a></td> +<td class="bot right">153</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">46.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig46">Evans’s Non-Condensing Engine, 1800</a></td> +<td class="bot right">156</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">47.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig47">Evans’s “Oruktor Amphibolis,” 1804</a></td> +<td class="bot right">157</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">48.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig48">Gurney’s Steam-Carriage</a></td> +<td class="bot right">163</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">49.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig49">Hancock’s “Autopsy”, 1833</a></td> +<td class="bot right">168</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">50.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig50">Trevithick’s Locomotive, 1804</a></td> +<td class="bot right">175</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">51.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig51">Stephenson’s Locomotive of 1815. Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">187</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">52.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig52">Stephenson’s No. 1 Engine, 1825</a></td> +<td class="bot right">191</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">53.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig53">Opening of the Stockton and Darlington Railroad, 1815</a></td> +<td class="bot right">192</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">54.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig54">The “Novelty,” 1829</a></td> +<td class="bot right">197</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">55.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig55">The “Rocket,” 1829</a></td> +<td class="bot right">198</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">56.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig56">The Atmospheric Railroad</a></td> +<td class="bot right">202</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">57.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig57">Stephenson’s Locomotive, 1833</a></td> +<td class="bot right">203</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">58.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig58">The Stephenson Valve-Gear, 1833</a></td> +<td class="bot right">206</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">59.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig59">The “Atlantic,” 1832</a></td> +<td class="bot right">210</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">60.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig60">The “Best Friend,” 1830</a></td> +<td class="bot right">211</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">61.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig61">The “West Point,” 1831</a></td> +<td class="bot right">212</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">62.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig62">The “South Carolina,” 1831</a></td> +<td class="bot right">213</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">63.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig63">The “Stevens” Rail and Enlarged Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">215</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">64.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig64">“Old Ironsides,” 1832</a></td> +<td class="bot right">216</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">65.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig65">The “E. L. Miller,” 1834</a></td> +<td class="bot right">217</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">66.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig66">Hulls’s Steamboat, 1736</a></td> +<td class="bot right">226</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">67.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig67">Fitch’s Model, 1785</a></td> +<td class="bot right">236</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">68.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig68">Fitch & Voight’s Boiler, 1787</a></td> +<td class="bot right">238</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">69.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig69">Fitch’s First Boat, 1787</a></td> +<td class="bot right">238</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">70.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xv" id="Page_xv">[xv]</a></span></td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig70">John Fitch, 1788</a></td> +<td class="bot right">239</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">71.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig71">John Fitch, 1796</a></td> +<td class="bot right">240</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">72.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig72">Miller, Taylor & Symmington, 1788</a></td> +<td class="bot right">242</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">73.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig73">Read’s Boiler in Section, 1788</a></td> +<td class="bot right">245</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">74.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig74">Read’s Multi-Tubular Boiler, 1788</a></td> +<td class="bot right">245</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">75.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig75">The “Charlotte Dundas,” 1801</a></td> +<td class="bot right">247</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">76.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig76">The “Comet,” 1812</a></td> +<td class="bot right">248</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">77.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig77">Fulton’s Experiments</a></td> +<td class="bot right">253</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">78.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig78">Fulton’s Table of Resistances</a></td> +<td class="bot right">254</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">79.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig79">Barlow’s Water-Tube Boiler, 1793</a></td> +<td class="bot right">256</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">80.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig80">The “Clermont,” 1807</a></td> +<td class="bot right">258</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">81.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig81">Engine of the “Clermont,” 1808</a></td> +<td class="bot right">258</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">82.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig82">Launch of the “Fulton the First,” 1804</a></td> +<td class="bot right">262</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">83.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig83">Section of Steam-Boiler, 1804</a></td> +<td class="bot right">264</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">84.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig84">Engine, Boiler, and Screw-Propellers used by Stevens, 1804</a></td> +<td class="bot right">265</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">85.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig85">Stevens’s Screw Steamer, 1804</a></td> +<td class="bot right">265</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">86.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig86">John Stevens’s Twin-Screw Steamer, 1805</a></td> +<td class="bot right">269</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">87.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig87">The Feathering Paddle-Wheel</a></td> +<td class="bot right">272</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">88.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig88">The “North America” and “Albany,” 1827-’30</a></td> +<td class="bot right">274</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">89.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig89">Stevens’s Return Tubular Boiler, 1832</a></td> +<td class="bot right">275</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">90.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig90">Stevens’s Valve-Motion</a></td> +<td class="bot right">276</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">91.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig91">The “Atlantic,” 1851</a></td> +<td class="bot right">290</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">92.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig92">The Side-Lever Engine, 1849</a></td> +<td class="bot right">291</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">93.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig93">Vertical Stationary Steam-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">308</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">94.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig94">Vertical Stationary Steam-Engine. Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">309</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">95.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig95">Horizontal Stationary Steam-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">312</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">96.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig96">Horizontal Stationary Steam-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">313</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">97.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig97">Corliss Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">319</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">98.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig98">Corliss Engine Valve-Motion</a></td> +<td class="bot right">320</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">99.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig99">Greene Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">321</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">100.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig100">Thurston’s Greene-Engine Valve-Gear</a></td> +<td class="bot right">322</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">101.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig101">Cornish Pumping-Engine, 1880</a></td> +<td class="bot right">329</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">102.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig102">Steam-Pump</a></td> +<td class="bot right">331</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">103.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig103">The Worthington Pumping-Engine, 1876. Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">333</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">104.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig104">The Worthington Pumping-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">334</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">105.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig105">Double-Cylinder Pumping-Engine, 1878</a></td> +<td class="bot right">335</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">106.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig106">The Lawrence Water-Works Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">336</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">107.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig107">The Leavitt Pumping-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">337</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">108.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig108">Babcock & Wilcox’s Vertical Boiler</a></td> +<td class="bot right">341</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">109.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig109">Stationary “Locomotive” Boiler</a></td> +<td class="bot right">342</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">110.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig110">Galloway Tube</a></td> +<td class="bot right">343</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">111.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig111">Harrison’s Sectional Boiler</a></td> +<td class="bot right">345</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">112.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xvi" id="Page_xvi">[xvi]</a></span></td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig112">Babcock and Wilcox’s Sectional Boiler</a></td> +<td class="bot right">346</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">113.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig113">Root Sectional Boiler</a></td> +<td class="bot right">347</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">114.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig114">Semi-Portable Engine, 1878</a></td> +<td class="bot right">348</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">115.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig115">Semi-Portable Engine, 1878</a></td> +<td class="bot right">349</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">116.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig116">The Portable Steam-Engine, 1878</a></td> +<td class="bot right">354</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">117.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig117">The Thrashers’ Road-Engine, 1878</a></td> +<td class="bot right">355</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">118.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig118">Fisher’s Steam-Carriage</a></td> +<td class="bot right">356</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">119.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig119">Road and Farm Locomotive</a></td> +<td class="bot right">357</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">120.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig120">The Latta Steam Fire-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">361</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">121.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig121">The Amoskeag Engine. Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">363</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">122.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig122">The Silsby Rotary Steam Fire-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">364</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">123.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig123">Rotary Steam-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">365</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">124.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig124">Rotary Pump</a></td> +<td class="bot right">366</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">125.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig125">Tank Engine, New York Elevated Railroad</a></td> +<td class="bot right">369</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">126.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig126">Forney’s Tank-Locomotive</a></td> +<td class="bot right">370</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">127.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig127">British Express Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">371</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">128.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig128">The Baldwin Locomotive. Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">372</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">129.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig129">The American Type of Express Engine, 1878</a></td> +<td class="bot right">374</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">130.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig130">Beam Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">380</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">131.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig131">Oscillating Steam-Engine and Feathering Paddle-Wheel</a></td> +<td class="bot right">381</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">132.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig132">The Two “Rhode Islands,” 1836-1876</a></td> +<td class="bot right">383</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">133.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig133">A Mississippi Steamboat</a></td> +<td class="bot right">384</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">134.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig134">Steam-Launch, New York Steam-Power Company</a></td> +<td class="bot right">386</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">135.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig135">Launch-Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">387</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">136.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig136">Horizontal, Direct-acting Naval Screw Engine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">389</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">137.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig137">Compound Marine Engine. Side Elevation</a></td> +<td class="bot right">390</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">138.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig138">Compound Marine Engine. Front Elevation and Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">391</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">139.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig139">Screw-Propeller</a></td> +<td class="bot right">400</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">140.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig140">Tug-Boat Screw</a></td> +<td class="bot right">401</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">141.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig141">Hirsch Screw</a></td> +<td class="bot right">401</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">142.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig142">Marine Fire-Tubular Boiler. Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">403</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">143.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig143">Marine High-Pressure Boiler. Section</a></td> +<td class="bot right">404</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">144.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig144">The Modern Steamship</a></td> +<td class="bot right">407</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">145.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig145">Modern Iron-Clads</a></td> +<td class="bot right">410</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">146.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig146">The “Great Eastern”</a></td> +<td class="bot right">415</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">147.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Fig147">The “Great Eastern” at Sea</a></td> +<td class="bot right">416</td> +</tr> + +</table> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_xvii" id="Page_xvii">[xvii]</a></p> +<h2>PORTRAITS.</h2> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<table width="50%" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" summary="List of Portraits"> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="left fsize80">NO.</td> +<td class="right fsize80">PAGE</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">1.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port1">Edward Somerset, the Second Marquis of Worcester</a></td> +<td class="bot right">20</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">2.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port2">Thomas Savery</a></td> +<td class="bot right">31</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">3.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port3">Denys Papin</a></td> +<td class="bot right">46</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">4.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port4">James Watt</a></td> +<td class="bot right">80</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">5.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port5">Matthew Boulton</a></td> +<td class="bot right">94</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">6.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port6">Oliver Evans</a></td> +<td class="bot right">154</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">7.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port7">Richard Trevithick</a></td> +<td class="bot right">174</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">8.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port8">Colonel John Stevens</a></td> +<td class="bot right">178</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">9.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port9">George Stephenson</a></td> +<td class="bot right">183</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">10.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port10">Robert Fulton</a></td> +<td class="bot right">251</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">11.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port11">Robert L. Stevens</a></td> +<td class="bot right">270</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">12.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port12">John Elder</a></td> +<td class="bot right">393</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">13.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port13">Benjamin Thompson, Count Rumford</a></td> +<td class="bot right">434</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">14.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port14">James Prescott Joule</a></td> +<td class="bot right">439</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="top right">15.</td> +<td class="just"><a href="#Port15">Prof. W. J. M. Rankine</a></td> +<td class="bot right">443</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<hr class="c40" /> +<p> </p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>[“A Machine, receiving at distant times and from many hands new +combinations and improvements, and becoming at last of signal benefit to +mankind, may be compared to a rivulet swelled in its course by tributary +streams, until it rolls along a majestic river, enriching, in its progress, provinces +and kingdoms.</p> + +<p>“In retracing the current, too, from where it mingles with the ocean, +the pretensions of even ample subsidiary streams are merged in our admiration +of the master-flood, glorying, as it were, in its expansion. But as +we continue to ascend, those waters which, nearer the sea, would have been +disregarded as unimportant, begin to rival in magnitude and share our +attention with the parent stream; until, at length, on our approaching the +fountains of the river, it appears trickling from the rock, or oozing from +among the flowers of the valley.</p> + +<p>“So, also, in developing the rise of a machine, a coarse instrument or a +toy may be recognized as the germ of that production of mechanical genius, +whose power and usefulness have stimulated our curiosity to mark its +changes and to trace its origin. The same feelings of reverential gratitude +which attached holiness to the spot whence mighty rivers sprang, also +clothed with divinity, and raised altars in honor of, inventors of the saw, +the plough, the potter’s wheel, and the loom.”—<span class="smcap">Stuart.</span>]</p></div> + +<p> </p> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[1]</a></span></p> +<h1>THE GROWTH OF THE STEAM-ENGINE.</h1> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I"></a>CHAPTER I.</h2> + +<h3><i>THE STEAM-ENGINE AS A SIMPLE MACHINE.</i></h3> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<h4><span class="smcap">Section I.</span>—<span class="smcap">The Period of Speculation—from Hero +to Worcester, b. c. 200 to a. d. 1650.</span></h4> + +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>One of the greatest of modern philosophers—the founder +of that system of scientific philosophy which traces the +processes of evolution in every department, whether physical +or intellectual—has devoted a chapter of his “First +Principles” of the new system to the consideration of the +multiplication of the effects of the various forces, social and +other, which are continually modifying this wonderful and +mysterious universe of which we form a part. Herbert +Spencer, himself an engineer, there traces the wide-spreading, +never-ceasing influences of new inventions, of the introduction +of new forms of mechanism, and of the growth of +industrial organization, with a clearness and a conciseness +which are so eminently characteristic of his style. His +illustration of this idea by reference to the manifold effects +of the introduction of steam-power and its latest<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[2]</a></span> embodiment, +the locomotive-engine, is one of the strongest passages +in his work. The power of the steam-engine, and its inconceivable +importance as an agent of civilization, has always +been a favorite theme with philosophers and historians as +well as poets. As Religion has always been, and still is, +the great <i>moral</i> agent in civilizing the world, and as Science +is the great <i>intellectual</i> promoter of civilization, so the +Steam-Engine is, in modern times, the most important <i>physical</i> +agent in that great work.</p> + +<p>It would be superfluous to attempt to enumerate the +benefits which it has conferred upon the human race, for +such an enumeration would include an addition to every +comfort and the creation of almost every luxury that we +now enjoy. The wonderful progress of the present century +is, in a very great degree, due to the invention and improvement +of the steam-engine, and to the ingenious application +of its power to kinds of work that formerly taxed +the physical energies of the human race. We cannot examine +the methods and processes of any branch of industry +without discovering, somewhere, the assistance and support +of this wonderful machine. Relieving mankind from manual +toil, it has left to the intellect the privilege of directing +the power, formerly absorbed in physical labor, into other +and more profitable channels. The intelligence which has +thus conquered the powers of Nature, now finds itself free +to do head-work; the force formerly utilized in the carrying +of water and the hewing of wood, is now expended in +the God-like work of <span class="smcap">thought</span>. What, then, can be more +interesting than to trace the history of the growth of this +wonderful machine?—the greatest among the many great +creations of one of God’s most beneficent gifts to man—the +power of invention.</p> + +<p>While following the records and traditions which relate +to the steam-engine, I propose to call attention to the fact +that its history illustrates the very important truth: <i>Great +inventions are never, and great discoveries are seldom, the</i><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[3]</a></span><i> +work of any one mind</i>. Every great invention is really +either an aggregation of minor inventions, or the final step +of a progression. It is not a creation, but <i>a growth</i>—as +truly so as is that of the trees in the forest. Hence, the +same invention is frequently brought out in several countries, +and by several individuals, simultaneously. Frequently +an important invention is made before the world is +ready to receive it, and the unhappy inventor is taught, by +his failure, that it is as unfortunate to be in advance of his +age as to be behind it. Inventions only become successful +when they are not only needed, but when mankind is so far +advanced in intelligence as to appreciate and to express the +necessity for them, and to at once make use of them.</p> + +<p>More than half a century ago, an able New England +writer, in a communication to an English engineering +periodical, described the new machinery which was built +at Newport, R. I., by John Babcock and Robert L. Thurston, +for one of the first steamboats that ever ran between +that city and New York. He prefaced his description with +a frequently-quoted remark to the effect that, as Minerva +sprang, mature in mind, in full stature of body, and completely +armed, from the head of Jupiter, so the steam-engine +came forth, perfect at its birth, from the brain of James +Watt. But we shall see, as we examine the records of its +history, that, although James Watt was <i>an</i> inventor, and +probably the greatest of the inventors of the steam-engine, +he was still but one of the many men who have aided in +perfecting it, and who have now made us so familiar with +it, and its tremendous power and its facile adaptations, that +we have almost ceased to admire it, or to wonder at the +workings of the still more admirable intelligence that has +so far perfected it.</p> + +<p>Twenty-one centuries ago, the political power of Greece +was broken, although Grecian civilization had risen to its +zenith. Rome, ruder than her polished neighbor, was growing +continually stronger, and was rapidly gaining territory by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[4]</a></span> +absorbing weaker states. Egypt, older in civilization than +either Greece or Rome, fell but two centuries later before +the assault of the younger states, and became a Roman +province. Her principal city was at this time Alexandria, +founded by the great soldier whose name it bears, when in +the full tide of his prosperity. It had now become a great +and prosperous city, the centre of the commerce of the +world, the home of students and of learned men, and its +population was the wealthiest and most civilized of the then +known world.</p> + +<p>It is among the relics of that ancient Egyptian civilization +that we find the first records in the early history of the +steam-engine. In Alexandria, the home of Euclid, the great +geometrician, and possibly contemporary with that talented +engineer and mathematician, Archimedes, a learned writer, +called Hero, produced a manuscript which he entitled +“Spiritalia seu Pneumatica.”</p> + +<p>It is quite uncertain whether Hero was the inventor of +any number of the contrivances described in his work. It +is most probable that the apparatus described are principally +devices which had either been long known, or +which were invented by Ctesibius, an inventor who was +famous for the number and ingenuity of the hydraulic and +pneumatic machines that he devised. Hero states, in his +Introduction, his intention to describe existing machines +and earlier inventions, and to add his own. Nothing in the +text, however, indicates to whom the several machines are +to be ascribed.<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a></p> + +<p>The first part of Hero’s work is devoted to applications<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[5]</a></span> +of the syphon. The 11th proposition is the first application +of heat to produce motion of fluids.</p> + +<p>An altar and its pedestal are hollow and air-tight. A +liquid is poured into the pedestal, and a pipe inserted, of +which the lower end passes beneath the surface of the +liquid, and the upper extremity leads through a figure standing +at the altar, and terminates in a vessel inverted above +this altar. When a fire is made on the altar, the heat produced +expands the confined air, and the liquid is driven up +the tube, issuing from the vessel in the hand of the figure +standing by the altar, which thus seems to be offering a +libation. This toy embodies the essential principle of all +modern heat-engines—the change of energy from the form +known as heat-energy into mechanical energy, or work. It +is not at all improbable that this prototype of the modern +wonder-working machine may have been known centuries +before the time of Hero.</p> + +<p>Many forms of hydraulic apparatus, including the hand +fire-engine, which is familiar to us, and is still used in +many of our smaller cities, are described, the greater number +of which are probably attributable to Ctesibius. They +demand no description here.</p> + +<p>A hot-air engine, however, which is the subject of his +37th proposition, is of real interest.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig1" id="Fig1"></a> +<img src="images/illo033.png" alt="Opening Temple Doors" width="350" height="376" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 1.</span>—Opening Temple-Doors by Steam, +<span class="smcap">b. c.</span> 200.</p></div> + +<p>Hero sketches and describes a method of opening temple-doors +by the action of fire on an altar, which is an +ingenious device, and contains all the elements of the +machine of the Marquis of Worcester, which is generally +considered the first real steam-engine, with the single and +vital defect that the expanding fluid is air instead of steam. +The <a href="#Fig1">sketch</a>, from Greenwood’s translation, exhibits the device +very plainly. Beneath the temple-doors, in the space +<i>A B C D</i>, is placed a spherical vessel, <i>H</i>, containing water. +A pipe, <i>F G</i>, connects the upper part of this sphere with +the hollow and air-tight shell of the altar above, <i>D E</i>. +Another pipe, <i>K L M</i>, leads from the bottom of the vessel,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[6]</a></span> +<i>H</i>, over, in syphon-shape, to the bottom of a suspended +bucket, <i>N X</i>. The suspending cord is carried over a pulley +and led around two vertical barrels, <i>O P</i>, turning on pivots +at their feet, and carrying the doors above. Ropes led over +a pulley, <i>R</i>, sustain a counterbalance, <i>W</i>.</p> + +<p>On building a fire on the altar, the heated air within expands, +passes through the pipe, <i>F G</i>, and drives the water +contained in the vessel, <i>H</i>, through the syphon, <i>K L M</i>, +into the bucket, <i>N X</i>. The weight of the bucket, which +then descends, turns the barrels, <i>O P</i>, raises the counterbalance, +and opens the doors of the temple. On extinguishing +the fire, the air is condensed, the water returns through +the syphon from the bucket to the sphere, the counterbalance +falls, and the doors are closed.</p> + +<p>Another contrivance is next described, in which the +bucket is replaced by an air-tight bag, which, expanding as +the heated air enters it, contracts vertically and actuates +the mechanism, which in other respects is similar to that +just described.</p> + +<p>In these devices the spherical vessel is a perfect anticipation<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[7]</a></span> +of the vessels used many centuries later by several +so-called inventors of the steam-engine.</p> + +<p>Proposition 45 describes the familiar experiment of a +ball supported aloft by a jet of fluid. In this example +steam is generated in a close cauldron, and issues from a +pipe inserted in the top, the ball dancing on the issuing jet.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig2" id="Fig2"></a> +<img src="images/illo034.png" alt="Steam Fountain" width="350" height="364" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 2.</span>—Steam Fountain, <span class="smcap">b. c.</span> 200.</p></div> + +<p>No. 47 is a <a href="#Fig2">device</a> subsequently reproduced—perhaps +reinvented by the second Marquis of Worcester.</p> + +<p>A strong, close vessel, <i>A B C D</i>, forms a pedestal, on +which are mounted a spherical vessel, <i>E F</i>, and a basin. +A pipe, <i>H K</i>, is led from the bottom of the larger vessel +into the upper part of the sphere, and another pipe from the +lower part of the latter, in the form of a syphon, over to +the basin, <i>M</i>. A drain-pipe, <i>N O</i>, leads from the basin to +the reservoir, <i>A D</i>. The whole contrivance is called “A +fountain which is made to flow by the action of the sun’s +rays.”</p> + +<p>It is operated thus: The vessel, <i>E F</i>, being filled nearly +to the top with water, or other liquid, and exposed to the +action of the sun’s rays, the air above the water expands, +and drives the liquid over, through the syphon, <i>G</i>, into the +basin, <i>M</i>, and it will fall into the pedestal, <i>A B C D</i>.</p> + +<p>Hero goes on to state that, on the removal of the sun’s +rays, the air in the sphere will contract, and that the water<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[8]</a></span> +will be returned to the sphere from the pedestal. This can, +evidently, only occur when the pipe <i>G</i> is closed previous to +the commencement of this cooling. No such cock is mentioned, +and it is not unlikely that the device only existed on +paper.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig3" id="Fig3"></a> +<img src="images/illo035.png" alt="Hero's Engine" width="350" height="398" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 3.</span>—Hero’s Engine, <span class="smcap">b. c.</span> 200.</p></div> + +<p>Several steam-boilers are described, usually simple pipes +or cylindrical vessels, and the steam generated in them by +the heat of the fire on the altar forms a steam-blast. This +blast is either directed into the fire, or it “makes a blackbird +sing,” blows a horn for a triton, or does other equally +useless work. In one device, No. 70, the steam issues from +a reaction-wheel revolving in the horizontal plane, and +causes dancing images to circle about the altar. A more +mechanical and more generally-known form of this device +is that which is frequently described as the “First Steam +Engine.” The <a href="#Fig3">sketch</a> from Stuart is similar in general +form, but more elaborate in detail, than that copied by +Greenwood, which is here also reproduced, as representing +more accurately the simple form which the mechanism of +the “Æolipile,” or Ball of Æolus, assumed in those early +times.</p> + +<p>The cauldron, <i>A B</i>, contains water, and is covered by the +steam-tight cover, <i>C D</i>. A globe is supported above the +cauldron by a pair of tubes, terminating, the one, <i>C M</i>, in a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[9]</a></span> +pivot, <i>L</i>, and the other, <i>E F</i>, opening directly into the +sphere at <i>G</i>. Short, bent pipes, <i>H</i> and <i>K</i>, issue from points +diametrically opposite each other, and are open at their +extremities.</p> + +<p>A fire being made beneath the cauldron, steam is formed +and finds exit through the pipe, <i>E F G</i>, into the globe, +and thence rushes out of the pipes, <i>H K</i>, turning the globe +on its axis, <i>G L</i>, by the unbalanced pressure thus produced.</p> + +<p>The more elaborate sketch which forms the <a href="#Frontispiece">frontispiece</a> +represents a machine of similar character. Its design +and ornamentation illustrate well the characteristics of +ancient art, and the Greek idea of the steam-engine.</p> + +<p>This “Æolipile” consisted of a globe, <i>X</i>, suspended between +trunnions, <i>O S</i>, through one of which steam enters +from the boiler, <i>P</i>, below. The hollow, bent arms, <i>W</i> and +<i>Z</i>, cause the vapor to issue in such directions that the reaction +produces a rotary movement of the globe, just as the +rotation of reaction water-wheels is produced by the outflowing +water.</p> + +<p>It is quite uncertain whether this machine was ever +more than a toy, although it has been supposed by some +authorities that it was actually used by the Greek priests +for the purpose of producing motion of apparatus in their +temples.</p> + +<p>It seems sufficiently remarkable that, while the power of +steam had been, during all the many centuries that man has +existed upon the globe, so universally displayed in so many +of the phenomena of natural change, that mankind lived +almost up to the Christian era without making it useful in +giving motion even to a toy; but it excites still greater +surprise that, from the time of Hero, we meet with no good +evidence of its application to practical purposes for many +hundreds of years.</p> + +<p>Here and there in the pages of history, and in special +treatises, we find a hint that the knowledge of the force of +steam was not lost; but it is not at all to the credit of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[10]</a></span> biographers +and of historians, that they have devoted so little +time to the task of seeking and recording information relating +to the progress of this and other important inventions +and improvements in the mechanic arts.</p> + +<p>Malmesbury states<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" +class="fnanchor">[7]</a> that, in the year <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1125, there +existed at Rheims, in the church of that town, a clock designed +or constructed by Gerbert, a professor in the schools +there, and an organ blown by air escaping from a vessel in +which it was compressed “by heated water.”</p> + +<p>Hieronymus Cardan, a wonderful mathematical genius, +a most eccentric philosopher, and a distinguished physician, +about the middle of the sixteenth century called attention, +in his writings, to the power of steam, and to the facility +with which a vacuum can be obtained by its condensation. +This Cardan was the author of “Cardan’s +Formula,” or rule for the solution of cubic equations, and +was the inventor of the “smoke-jack.” He has been called +a “philosopher, juggler, and madman.” He was certainly +a learned mathematician, a skillful physician, and a good +mechanic.</p> + +<p>Many traces are found, in the history of the sixteenth +century, of the existence of some knowledge of the properties +of steam, and some anticipation of the advantages +to follow its application. Matthesius, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1571, in one of +his sermons describes a contrivance which may be termed +a steam-engine, and enlarges on the “tremendous results +which may follow the volcanic action of a small quantity of +confined vapor;”<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" +class="fnanchor">[8]</a> and another writer applied the steam +æolipile of Hero to turn the spit, and thus rivaled and excelled +Cardan, who was introducing his “smoke-jack.”</p> + +<p>As Stuart says, the inventor enumerated its excellent +qualities with great minuteness. He claimed that it would +“eat nothing, and giving, withal, an assurance to those<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[11]</a></span> partaking +of the feast, whose suspicious natures nurse queasy +appetites, that the haunch has not been pawed by the turnspit +in the absence of the housewife’s eye, for the pleasure +of licking his unclean fingers.”<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p> + +<p>Jacob Besson, a Professor of Mathematics and Natural +Philosophy at Orleans, and who was in his time distinguished +as a mechanician, and for his ingenuity in contriving +illustrative models for use in his lecture-room, left evidence, +which Beroaldus collected and published in 1578,<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a +href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> +that he had found the spirit of his time sufficiently enlightened +to encourage him to pay great attention to applied +mechanics and to mechanism. There was at this time a +marked awakening of the more intelligent men of the age +to the value of practical mechanics. A scientific tract, published +at Orleans in 1569, and probably written by Besson, +describes very intelligently the generation of steam by the +communication of heat to water, and its peculiar properties.</p> + +<p>The French were now becoming more interested in mechanics +and the allied sciences, and philosophers and literati, +of native birth and imported by the court from other countries, +were learning more of the nature and importance of +such studies as have a bearing upon the work of the engineer +and of the mechanic.</p> + +<p>Agostino Ramelli, an Italian of good family, a student +and an artist when at leisure, a soldier and an engineer in +busier times, was born and educated at Rome, but subsequently +was induced to make his home in Paris. He published +a book in 1588,<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" +class="fnanchor">[11]</a> in which he described many machines, +adapted to various purposes, with a skill that was +only equaled by the accuracy and general excellence of his +delineations. This work was produced while its author was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[12]</a></span> +residing at the French capital, supported by a pension which +had been awarded him by Henry III. as a reward for long +and faithful services.</p> + +<p>The books of Besson and of Ramelli are the first treatises +of importance on general machinery, and were, for many +years, at once the sources from which later writers drew +the principal portion of their information in relation to machinery, +and wholesome stimulants to the study of mechanism. +These works contain descriptions of many machines +subsequently reinvented and claimed as new by other mechanics.</p> + +<p>Leonardo da Vinci, well known as a mathematician, engineer, +poet, and painter, of the sixteenth century, describes, +it is said, a steam-gun, which he calls the “Architonnerre,” +and ascribes to Archimedes. It was a machine composed of +copper, and seems to have had considerable power. It threw +a ball weighing a talent. The steam was generated by permitting +water in a closed vessel to fall on surfaces heated +by a charcoal fire, and by its sudden expansion to eject the +ball.</p> + +<p>In the year 1825, the superintendent of the royal Spanish +archives at Simancas furnished an account which, it was +said, had been there discovered of an attempt, made in +1543 by Blasco de Garay, a Spanish navy-officer under +Charles V., to move a ship by paddle-wheels, driven, as was +inferred from the account, by a steam-engine.</p> + +<p>It is impossible to say to how much credit the story is +entitled, but, if true, it was the first attempt, so far as is now +known, to make steam useful in developing power for practical +purposes. Nothing is known of the form of the engine +employed, it only having been stated that a “vessel of boiling +water” formed a part of the apparatus.</p> + +<p>The account is, however, in other respects so circumstantial, +that it has been credited by many; but it is regarded +as apocryphal by the majority of writers upon the +subject. It was published in 1826 by M. de Navarrete, in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[13]</a></span> +Zach’s “Astronomical Correspondence,” in the form of a +letter from Thomas Gonzales, Director of the Royal Archives +at Simancas, Spain.</p> + +<p>In 1601, Giovanni Battista della Porta, in a work called +“Spiritali,” described an apparatus by which the pressure +of steam might be made to raise a column of water. It included +the application of the condensation of steam to the +production of a vacuum into which the water would flow.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig4" id="Fig4"></a> +<img src="images/illo041.png" alt="Porta's Apparatus" width="234" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 4.</span>—Porta’s Apparatus, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1601.</p></div> + +<p>Porta is described as a mathematician, chemist, and +physicist, a gentleman of fortune, and an enthusiastic student +of science. His home in Naples was a rendezvous +for students, artists, and men of science distinguished in +every branch. He invented the magic lantern and the +camera obscura, and described it in his commentary on the +“Pneumatica.” In his work,<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a +href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> he described this machine +for raising water, as shown in <a href="#Fig4">Fig. 4</a>, which differs from one +shown by Hero in the use of steam pressure, instead of the +pressure of heated air, for expelling the liquid.</p> + +<p>The retort, or boiler, is fitted to a tank from which the +bent pipe leads into the external air. A fire being kindled +under the retort, the steam generated rises to the upper +part of the tank, and its pressure on the surface of the +water drives it out through the pipe, and it is then led to +any desired height. This was called by Porta an improved +“Hero’s Fountain,” and was named his “Steam Fountain.” +He described with perfect accuracy the action of condensation +in producing a vacuum, and sketched an apparatus in +which the vacuum thus secured was filled by water forced +in by the pressure of the external atmosphere. His contrivances +were not apparently ever applied to any practically +useful purpose. We have not yet passed out of the age of +speculation, and are just approaching the period of application. +Porta is, nevertheless, entitled to credit as having<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[14]</a></span> proposed +an essential change in this succession, which begins +with Hero, and which did not end with Watt.</p> + +<p>The use of steam in Hero’s fountain was as necessary a +step as, although less striking than, any of the subsequent +modifications of the machine. In Porta’s contrivance, too, +we should note particularly the separation of the boiler from +the “forcing vessel”—a plan often claimed as original with +later inventors, and as constituting a fair ground for special +distinction.</p> + +<p>The rude engraving (<a href="#Fig4">Fig. 4</a>) above is copied from the +book of Porta, and shows plainly the boiler mounted above +a furnace, from the door of which the flame is seen issuing, +and above is the tank containing water. The opening in the +top is closed by the plug, as shown, and the steam issuing<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[15]</a></span> +from the boiler into the tank near the top, the water is +driven out through the pipe at the left, leading up from the +bottom of the tank.</p> + +<p>Florence Rivault, a Gentleman of the Bedchamber to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[16]</a></span> +Henry IV., and a teacher of Louis XIII., is stated by M. +Arago, the French philosopher, to have discovered, as early +as 1605, that water confined in a bomb-shell and there heated +would explode the shell, however thick its walls might +be made. The fact was published in Rivault’s treatise on +artillery in 1608. He says: “The water is converted into +air, and its vaporization is followed by violent explosion.”</p> + +<p>In 1615, Salomon de Caus, who had been an engineer +and architect under Louis XIII. of France, and later in the +employ of the English Prince of Wales, published a work +at Frankfort, entitled “Les Raisons des Forces Mouvantes, +avec diverses machines tant utile que plaisante,” in which +he illustrated his proposition, “Water will, by the aid of +fire, mount higher than its source,” by describing a machine +designed to raise water by the expanding power of steam.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig5" id="Fig5"></a> +<img src="images/illo042.png" alt="De Caus's Apparatus" width="214" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 5.</span>—De Caus’s Apparatus, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1605.</p></div> + +<p>In the sketch here given (<a href="#Fig5">Fig. 5</a>), and which is copied +from the original in “Les Raisons des Forces Mouvantes,” +etc., <i>A</i> is the copper ball containing water; <i>B</i>, the cock at +the extremity of the pipe, taking water from the bottom, <i>C</i>, +of the vessel; <i>D</i>, the cock through which the vessel is filled. +The sketch was probably made by De Caus’s own hand.</p> + +<p>The machine of De Caus, like that of Porta, thus consisted +of a metal vessel partly filled with water, and in which a pipe +was fitted, leading nearly to the bottom, and open at the +top. Fire being applied, the steam formed by its elastic +force drove the water out through the vertical pipe, raising +it to a height limited only by either the desire of the +builder or the strength of the vessel.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig6" id="Fig6"></a> +<img src="images/illo044.png" alt="Branca's Steam Engine" width="500" height="326" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 6.</span>—Branca’s Steam-Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1629.</p></div> + +<p>In 1629, Giovanni Branca, of the Italian town of Loretto, +described, in a work<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a +href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> published at Rome, a number of ingenious +mechanical contrivances, among which was a steam-engine +(<a href="#Fig6">Fig. 6</a>), in which the steam, issuing from a boiler, +impinged upon the vanes of a horizontal wheel. This it +was proposed to apply to many useful purposes.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[17]</a></span>At this time experiments were in progress in England +which soon resulted in the useful application of steam-power +to raising water.</p> + +<p>A patent, dated January 21, 1630, was granted to David +Ramseye<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> +by Charles I., which covered a number of distinct +inventions. These were: “1. To multiply and make +saltpeter in any open field, in fower acres of ground, sufficient +to serve all our dominions. 2. To raise water from +low pitts by fire. 3. To make any sort of mills to goe on +standing waters by continual motion, without help of wind, +water, or horse. 4. To make all sortes of tapistrie without +any weaving-loom, or waie ever yet in use in this kingdome. +5. To make boats, shippes, and barges to goe against strong +wind and tide. 6. To make the earth more fertile than usual. +7. To raise water from low places and mynes, and coal +pitts, by a new waie never yet in use. 8. To make hard +iron soft, and likewise copper to be tuffe and soft, which is +not in use in this kingdome. 9. To make yellow waxe white +verie speedilie.”</p> + +<p>This seems to have been the first authentic reference to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[18]</a></span> +the use of steam in the arts which has been found in English +literature. The patentee held his grant fourteen years, +on condition of paying an annual fee of £3 6<i>s.</i> 8<i>d.</i> to the +Crown.</p> + +<p>The second claim is distinct as an application of steam, +the language being that which was then, and for a century +and a half subsequently, always employed in speaking +of its use. The steam-engine, in all its forms, was at that +time known as the “fire-engine.” It would seem not +at all improbable that the third, fifth, and seventh claims +are also applications of steam-power.</p> + +<p>Thomas Grant, in 1632, and Edward Ford, in 1640, also +patented schemes, which have not been described in detail, +for moving ships against wind and tide by some new and +great force.</p> + +<p>Dr. John Wilkins, Bishop of Chester, an eccentric but +learned and acute scholar, described, in 1648, Cardan’s +smoke-jack, the earlier æolipiles, and the power of the confined +steam, and suggested, in a humorous discourse, what +he thought to be perfectly feasible—the construction of a +flying-machine. He says: “Might not a ‘high pressure’ +be applied with advantage to move wings as large as those +of the ‘ruck’s’ or the ‘chariot’? The engineer might +probably find a corner that would do for a coal-station +near some of the ‘castles’” (castles in the air). The reverend +wit proposed the application of the smoke-jack to +the chiming of bells, the reeling of yarn, and to rocking +the cradle.</p> + +<p>Bishop Wilkins writes, in 1648 (“Mathematical Magic”), +of æolipiles as familiar and useful pieces of apparatus, and +describes them as consisting “of some such material as may +endure the fire, having a small hole at which they are filled +with water, and out of which (when the vessels are heated) +the air doth issue forth with a strong and lasting violence.” +“They are,” the bishop adds, “frequently used for the exciting +and contracting of heat in the melting of glasses or<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</a></span> +metals. They may also be contrived to be serviceable for +sundry other pleasant uses, as for the moving of sails in a +chimney-corner, the motion of which sails may be applied +to the turning of a spit, or the like.”</p> + +<p>Kircher gives an engraving (“Mundus Subterraneus”) +showing the last-named application of the æolipile; and +Erckern (“Aula Subterranea,” 1672) gives a picture illustrating +their application to the production of a blast in smelting +ores. They seem to have been frequently used, and in all +parts of Europe, during the seventeenth century, for blowing +fires in houses, as well as in the practical work of the +various trades, and for improving the draft of chimneys. +The latter application is revived very frequently by the +modern inventor.</p> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<h4><span class="smcap">Section II.—The Period of Application—Worcester, +Papin, and Savery.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>We next meet with the first instance in which the expansive +force of steam is supposed to have actually been +applied to do important and useful work.</p> + +<p>In 1663, Edward Somerset, second Marquis of Worcester, +published a curious collection of descriptions of his inventions, +couched in obscure and singular language, and +called “A Century of the Names and Scantlings of Inventions +by me already Practised.”</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig7" id="Fig7"></a> +<img src="images/illo048.png" alt="Worcester's Steam Fountain" width="350" height="456" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 7.</span>—Worcester’s Steam Fountain, +<span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1650.</p></div> + +<p>One of these inventions is an apparatus for raising water +by steam. The description was not accompanied by a +drawing, but the sketch here given (<a href="#Fig7">Fig. 7</a>) is thought +probably to resemble one of his earlier contrivances very +closely.</p> + +<p>Steam is generated in the boiler <i>a</i>, and thence is led into +the vessel <i>e</i>, already nearly filled with water, and fitted up +like the apparatus of De Caus. It drives the water in a jet +out through the pipe <i>f</i>. The vessel <i>e</i> is then shut off from +the boiler <i>a</i>, is again filled through the pipe <i>h</i>, and the operation +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[20]</a></span> +is repeated. Stuart thinks it possible that the marquis +may have even made an engine with a piston, and +sketches it.<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" +class="fnanchor">[15]</a> The instruments of Porta and of De Caus +were “steam fountains,” and were probably applied, if used +at all, merely to ornamental purposes. That of the <a href="#Port1">Marquis +of Worcester</a> was actually used for the purpose of +elevating water for practical purposes at Vauxhall, near +London.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port1" id="Port1"></a> +<img src="images/illo047.png" alt="Worcester" width="350" height="427" /> +<p class="caption">Edward Somerset, the Second Marquis of Worcester.</p></div> + +<p>How early this invention was introduced at Raglan Castle +by Worcester is not known, but it was probably not +much later than 1628. In 1647 Dircks shows the marquis +probably to have been engaged in getting out parts of the +later engine which was erected at Vauxhall, obtaining his<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</a></span> +materials from William Lambert, a brass-founder. His patent +was issued in June, 1663.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig8" id="Fig8"></a> +<img src="images/illo049a.png" alt="Worcester's Engine" width="183" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 8.</span>—Worcester’s Engine, +<span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1665.</p></div> + +<p>We nowhere find an illustrated description of the machine, +or such an account as would enable a mechanic to +reproduce it in all its details. Fortunately, the cells and +grooves (<a href="#Fig9">Fig. 9</a>) remaining in the wall of the citadel of +Raglan Castle indicate the general dimensions and arrangement +of the engine; and Dircks, the biographer of the inventor, +has suggested the form of apparatus shown in the +sketch (<a href="#Fig8">Fig. 8</a>) as most perfectly in accord with the evidence +there found, and with the written specifications.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig9" id="Fig9"></a> +<img src="images/illo049b.png" alt="Raglan Castle Wall" width="223" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 9.</span>—Wall of Raglan Castle.</p></div> + +<p>The two vessels, <i>A A′</i>, are connected by a steam-pipe, +<i>B B′</i>, with the boiler, <i>C</i>, behind them. <i>D</i> is the furnace. +A vertical water-pipe, <i>E</i>, is connected with the cold-water +vessels, <i>A A′</i>, by the pipes, <i>F F′</i>, reaching nearly to +the bottom. Water is supplied by the pipes, <i>G G′</i>, with +valves, <i>a a′</i>, dipping into the well or ditch, <i>H</i>. Steam from<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</a></span> +the boiler being admitted to each vessel, <i>A</i> and <i>A′</i>, alternately, +and there condensing, the vacuum formed permits +the pressure of the atmosphere to force the water +from the well through the pipes, <i>G</i> and <i>G′</i>. While one is +filling, the steam is forcing the charge of water from the +other up the discharge-pipe, <i>E</i>. As soon as each is emptied, +the steam is shut off from it and turned into the other, and +the condensation of the steam remaining in the vessel permits +it to fill again. As will be seen presently, this is substantially, +and almost precisely, the form of engine of which +the invention is usually attributed to Savery, a later inventor.</p> + +<p>Worcester never succeeded in forming the great company +which he hoped would introduce his invention on a +scale commensurate with its importance, and his fate was +that of nearly all inventors. He died poor and unsuccessful.</p> + +<p>His widow, who lived until 1681, seemed to have become +as confident as was Worcester himself that the invention +had value, and, long after his death, was still<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</a></span> endeavoring +to secure its introduction, but with equal non-success. +The steam-engine had taken a form which made it +inconceivably valuable to the world, at a time when no more +efficient means of raising water was available at the most +valuable mines than horse-power; but the people, greatly as +it was needed, were not yet sufficiently intelligent to avail +themselves of the great boon, the acceptance of which was +urged upon them with all the persistence and earnestness +which characterizes every true inventor.</p> + +<p>Worcester is described by his biographer as having been +a learned, thoughtful, studious, and good man—a Romanist +without prejudice or bigotry, a loyal subject, free from partisan +intolerance; as a public man, upright, honorable, and +humane; as a scholar, learned without being pedantic; as +a mechanic, patient, skillful, persevering, and of wonderful +ingenuity, and of clear, almost intuitive, apprehension.</p> + +<p>Yet, with all these natural advantages, reinforced as they +were by immense wealth and influence in his earlier life, +and by hardly lessened social and political influence when +a large fortune had been spent in experiment, and after misfortune +had subdued his spirits and left him without money +or a home, the inventor failed to secure the introduction of +a device which was needed more than any other. Worcester +had attained practical success; but the period of speculation +was but just closing, and that of the application of +steam had not quite yet arrived.</p> + +<p>The second Marquis of Worcester stands on the record +as the first steam-engine builder, and his death marks the +termination of the first of those periods into which we have +divided the history of the growth of the steam-engine.</p> + +<p>The “water-commanding engine,” as its inventor called +it, was the first instance in the history of the steam-engine in +which the inventor is known to have “reduced his invention +to practice.”</p> + +<p>It is evident, however, that the invention of the separate +boiler, important as it was, had been anticipated by Porta,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</a></span> +and does not entitle the marquis to the honor, claimed for +him by many English authorities, of being <i>the</i> inventor of +the steam-engine. Somerset was simply <i>one</i> of those whose +works collectively made the steam-engine.</p> + +<p>After the time of Worcester, we enter upon a stage of +history which may properly be termed a period of application; +and from this time forward steam continued to play +a more and more important part in social economy, and its +influence on the welfare of mankind augmented with a rapidly-increasing +growth.</p> + +<p>The knowledge then existing of the immense expansive +force of steam, and the belief that it was destined to submit +to the control of man and to lend its immense power in +every department of industry, were evidently not confined to +any one nation. From Italy to Northern Germany, and +from France to Great Britain, the distances, measured in +time, were vastly greater then than now, when this wonderful +genius has helped us to reduce weeks to hours; +but there existed, notwithstanding, a very perfect system +of communication, and the learning of every centre was +promptly radiated to every other. It thus happened that, +at this time, the speculative study of the steam-engine was +confined to no part of Europe; inventors and experimenters +were busy everywhere developing this promising scheme.</p> + +<p>Jean Hautefeuille, the son of a French <i>boulanger</i>, born +at Orleans, adopted by the Duchess of Bouillon at the suggestion +of De Sourdis, profiting by the great opportunities +offered him, entered the Church, and became one of the +most learned men and greatest mechanicians of his time. +He studied the many schemes then brought forward by inventors +with the greatest interest, and was himself prolific +of new ideas.</p> + +<p>In 1678, he proposed the use of alcohol in an engine, +“in such a manner that the liquid should evaporate and be +condensed, <i>tour à tour</i>, without being wasted”<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a +href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a>—the first<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[25]</a></span> +recorded plan, probably, for surface-condensation and complete +retention of the working-fluid. He proposed a gunpowder-engine, +of which<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> +he described three varieties.</p> + +<p>In one of these engines he displaced the atmosphere by +the gases produced by the explosion, and the vacuum thus +obtained was utilized in raising water by the pressure of the +air. In the second machine, the pressure of the gases +evolved by the combustion of the powder acted directly +upon the water, forcing it upward; and in the third design, +the pressure of the vapor drove a piston, and this engine +was described as fitted to supply power for many purposes. +There is no evidence that he constructed these machines, +however, and they are here referred to simply as indicating +that all the elements of the machine were becoming well +known, and that an ingenious mechanic, combining known +devices, could at this time have produced the steam-engine. +Its early appearance should evidently have been +anticipated.</p> + +<p>Hautefeuille, if we may judge from evidence at hand, +was the first to propose the use of a piston in a heat-engine, +and his gunpowder-engine seems to have been the first machine +which would be called a heat-engine by the modern +mechanic. The earlier “machines” or “engines,” including +that of Hero and those of the Marquis of Worcester, would +rather be denominated “apparatus,” as that term is used by +the physicist or the chemist, than a machine or an engine, +as the terms are used by the engineer.</p> + +<div class="figleft"><a name="Fig10" id="Fig10"></a> +<img src="images/illo053.png" alt="Huyghens's Engine" width="96" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 10.</span>—<br />Huyghens’s<br />Engine,<br />1680.</p></div> + +<p>Huyghens, in 1680, in a memoir presented to the Academy +of Sciences, speaks of the expansive force of gunpowder +as capable of utilization as a convenient and portable +mechanical power, and indicates that he had designed a +machine in which it could be applied.</p> + +<p>This machine of Huyghens is of great interest, not<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[26]</a></span> simply +because it was the first gas-engine and the prototype of +the very successful modern explosive gas-engine +of Otto and Langen, but principally as +having been the first engine which consisted of +a cylinder and piston. The <a href="#Fig10">sketch</a> shows its +form. It consisted of a cylinder, <i>A</i>, a piston, +<i>B</i>, two relief-pipes, <i>C C</i>, fitted with check-valves +and a system of pulleys, <i>F</i>, by which the +weight is raised. The explosion of the powder +at <i>H</i> expels the air from the cylinder. When +the products of combustion have cooled, the +pressure of the atmosphere is no longer counterbalanced +by that of air beneath, and the piston +is forced down, raising the weight. The plan +was never put in practice, although the invention +was capable of being made a working and +possibly useful machine.</p> + +<p>At about this period the English attained +some superiority over their neighbors on the +Continent in the practical application of science +and the development of the useful arts, and it has never since +been lost. A sudden and great development of applied science +and of the useful arts took place during the reign of Charles +II., which is probably largely attributable to the interest +taken by that monarch in many branches of construction and +of science. He is said to have been very fond of mathematics, +mechanics, chemistry, and natural history, and to have had +a laboratory erected, and to have employed learned men to +carry on experiments and lines of research for his satisfaction. +He was especially fond of the study and investigation +of the arts and sciences most closely related to naval +architecture and navigation, and devoted much attention to +the determination of the best forms of vessels, and to the +discovery of the best kinds of ship-timber. His brother, +the Duke of York, was equally fond of this study, and was +his companion in some of his work.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[27]</a></span>Great as is the influence of the monarch, to-day, in forming +the tastes and habits and in determining the direction +of the studies and labors of the people, his influence was +vastly more potent in those earlier days; and it may well +be believed that the rapid strides taken by Great Britain +from that time were, in great degree, a consequence of the +well-known habits of Charles II., and that the nation, which +had an exceptional natural aptitude for mechanical pursuits, +should have been prompted by the example of its king +to enter upon such a course as resulted in the early attainment +of an advanced position in all branches of applied +science.</p> + +<p>The appointment, under Sir Robert Moray, the superintendent +of the laboratory of the king, of Master Mechanic, +was conferred upon Sir Samuel Morland, a nobleman who, +in his practical knowledge of mechanics and in his ingenuity +and fruitfulness of invention, was apparently almost equal +to Worcester. He was the son of a Berkshire clergyman, +was educated at Cambridge, where he studied mathematics +with great interest, and entered public life soon after. He +served the Parliament under Cromwell, and afterward went +to Geneva. He was of a decidedly literary turn of mind, +and wrote a history of the Piedmont churches, which gave +him great repute with the Protestant party. He was induced +subsequently, on the accession of Charles II., to take +service under that monarch, whose gratitude he had earned +by revealing a plot for his assassination.</p> + +<p>He received his appointment and a baronetcy in 1660, and +immediately commenced making experiments, partly at his +own expense and partly at the cost of the royal exchequer, +which were usually not at all remunerative. He built hand +fire-engines of various kinds, taking patents on them, which +brought him as small profits as did his work for the king, +and invented the speaking-trumpet, calculating machines, +and a capstan. His house at Vauxhall was full of curious +devices, the products of his own ingenuity.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[28]</a></span>He devoted much attention to apparatus for raising +water. His devices seem to have usually been modifications +of the now familiar force-pump. They attracted much attention, +and exhibitions were made of them before the king +and queen and the court. He was sent to France on business +relating to water-works erected for King Charles, and +while in Paris he constructed pumps and pumping apparatus +for the satisfaction of Louis XIV. In his book,<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a +href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> published +in Paris in 1683, and presented to the king, and an +earlier manuscript,<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a +href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> still preserved in the British Museum, +Morland shows a perfect familiarity with the power of +steam. He says, in the latter: “Water being evaporated +by fire, the vapors require a greater space (about two thousand +times) than that occupied by the water; and, rather +than submit to imprisonment, it will burst a piece of ordnance. +But, being controlled according to the laws of +statics, and, by science, reduced to the measure of weight +and balance, it bears its burden peaceably (like good horses), +and thus may be of great use to mankind, especially for the +raising of water, according to the following table, which +indicates the number of pounds which may be raised six +inches, 1,800 times an hour, by cylinders half-filled with +water, and of the several diameters and depths of said cylinders.”</p> + +<p>He then gives the following table, a comparison of +which with modern tables proves Morland to have acquired +a very considerable and tolerably accurate knowledge of +the volume and pressure of saturated steam:</p> + +<table class="fsize80" summary="P and V of Saturated Steam"> + +<tr> +<td class="center smcap bt br" colspan="3"><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[29]</a></span>Cylinders.</td> +<td class="center smcap bt">Pounds.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="bt"> </td> +<td class="center bt br padr1 padl1">Diameter in Feet.</td> +<td class="center bt br padr1 padl1">Depth in Feet.</td> +<td class="center bt padr1 padl1">Weight to be Raised.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="bt"> </td> +<td class="right br bt padr8">1</td> +<td class="right br bt padr6">2</td> +<td class="right bt padr8">15</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="right br padr8">2</td> +<td class="right br padr6">4</td> +<td class="right padr8">120</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="right br padr8">3</td> +<td class="right br padr6">6</td> +<td class="right padr8">405</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="right br padr8">4</td> +<td class="right br padr6">8</td> +<td class="right padr8">960</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="right br padr8">5</td> +<td class="right br padr6">10</td> +<td class="right padr8">1,876</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="bb"> </td> +<td class="right bb br padr8">6</td> +<td class="right bb br padr6">10</td> +<td class="right bb padr8">3,240</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td rowspan="18" valign="middle" class="center">Num-<br />ber<br />of<br />cylin-<br />ders<br />having<br />a<br /> +dia-<br />meter<br />of<br />6<br />feet<br />and<br />a<br />depth<br />of<br />12<br />feet.</td> +<td class="right br padr8">1</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">3,240</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">2</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">6,480</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">3</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">9,720</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">4</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">12,960</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">5</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">16,200</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">6</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">19,440</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">7</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">22,680</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">8</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">25,920</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">9</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">29,190</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">10</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">32,400</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">20</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">64,800</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">30</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">97,200</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">40</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">129,600</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">50</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">162,000</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">60</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">194,400</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">70</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">226,800</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="right br padr8">80</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">259,200</td> +</tr> + +<tr class="bb"> +<td class="right br padr8">90</td> +<td class="right br padr6">12</td> +<td class="right padr8">291,600</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p> </p> + +<p>The rate of enlargement of volume in the conversion of +water into steam, as given in Morland’s book, appears remarkably +accurate when compared with statements made +by other early experimenters. Desaguliers gave the ratio +of volumes at 14,000, and this was accepted as correct for +many years, and until Watt’s experiments, which were +quoted by Dr. Robison as giving the ratio at between +1,800 and 1,900. Morland also states the “duty” of his +engines in the same manner in which it is stated by engineers +to-day.</p> + +<p>Morland must undoubtedly have been acquainted with +the work of his distinguished contemporary, Lord Worcester, +and his apparatus seems most likely to have been a +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[30]</a></span> +modification—perhaps improvement—of Worcester’s engine. His +house was at Vauxhall, and the establishment set up for the +king was in the neighborhood. It may be that Morland is +to be credited with greater success in the introduction of +his predecessor’s apparatus than the inventor himself.</p> + +<p>Dr. Hutton considered this book to have been the earliest +account of the steam-engine, and accepts the date—1682—as +that of the invention, and adds, that “the project +seems to have remained obscure in both countries till 1699, +when Savery, who probably knew more of Morland’s invention +than he owned, obtained a patent,” etc. We have, +however, scarcely more complete or accurate knowledge of +the extent of Morland’s work, and of its real value, than of +that of Worcester. Morland died in 1696, at Hammersmith, +not far from London, and his body lies in Fulham church.</p> + +<p>From this time forward the minds of many mechanicians +were earnestly at work on this problem—the raising +of water by aid of steam. Hitherto, although many ingenious +toys, embodying the principles of the steam-engine +separately, and sometimes to a certain extent collectively, +had been proposed, and even occasionally constructed, the +world was only just ready to profit by the labors of inventors +in this direction.</p> + +<p>But, at the end of the seventeenth century, English +miners were beginning to find the greatest difficulty in +clearing their shafts of the vast quantities of water which +they were meeting at the considerable depths to which they +had penetrated, and it had become a matter of vital importance +to them to find a more powerful aid in that work +than was then available. They were, therefore, by their +necessities stimulated to watch for, and to be prepared +promptly to take advantage of, such an invention when it +should be offered them.</p> + +<p>The experiments of Papin, and the practical application +of known principles by Savery, placed the needed apparatus +in their hands.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port2" id="Port2"></a> +<img src="images/illo058.png" alt="Savery" width="350" height="437" /> +<p class="caption">Thomas Savery.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[31]</a></span> +<span class="smcap"><a href="#Port2">Thomas Savery</a></span> was a member of a well-known family +of Devonshire, England, and was born at Shilston, about +1650. He was well educated, and became a military engineer. +He exhibited great fondness for mechanics, and for +mathematics and natural philosophy, and gave much time +to experimenting, to the contriving of various kinds of +apparatus, and to invention. He constructed a clock, which +still remains in the family, and is considered an ingenious +piece of mechanism, and is said to be of excellent workmanship.</p> + +<p>He invented and patented an arrangement of paddle-wheels, +driven by a capstan<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> +for propelling vessels in calm +weather, and spent some time endeavoring to secure its +adoption by the British Admiralty and the Navy Board,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[32]</a></span> +but met with no success. The principal objector was the +Surveyor of the Navy, who dismissed Savery, with a remark +which illustrates a spirit which, although not yet extinct, is +less frequently met with in the public service now than +then: “What have interloping people, that have no concern +with us, to do to pretend to contrive or invent things +for us?”<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> +Savery then fitted his apparatus into a small +vessel, and exhibited its operation on the Thames. The +invention was never introduced into the navy, however.</p> + +<p>It was after this time that Savery became the inventor of +a steam-engine. It is not known whether he was familiar +with the work of Worcester, and of earlier inventors. Desaguliers<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a> +states that he had read the book of Worcester, and +that he subsequently endeavored to destroy all evidence of +the anticipation of his own invention by the marquis by buying +up all copies of the century that he could find, and burning +them. The story is scarcely credible. A comparison of +the drawings given of the two engines exhibits, nevertheless, +a striking resemblance; and, assuming that of the marquis’s +engine to be correct, Savery is to be given credit for +the finally successful introduction of the “semi-omnipotent” +“water-commanding” engine of Worcester.</p> + +<p>The most important advance in actual construction, +therefore, was made by Thomas Savery. The constant and +embarrassing expense, and the engineering difficulties presented +by the necessity of keeping the British mines, and +particularly the deep pits of Cornwall, free from water, and +the failure of every attempt previously made to provide +effective and economical pumping-machinery, were noted by +Savery, who, July 25, 1698, patented the design of the first +engine which was ever actually employed in this work. A +working-model was submitted to the Royal Society of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[33]</a></span> London +in 1699, and successful experiments were made with it. +Savery spent a considerable time in planning his engine and +in perfecting it, and states that he expended large sums of +money upon it.</p> + +<div class="figleft"><a name="Fig11" id="Fig11"></a> +<img src="images/illo061.png" alt="Savery's Model" width="248" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 11.</span>—Savery’s Model, 1698.</p></div> + +<p>Having finally succeeded in satisfying himself with its +operation, he exhibited a model “Fire-Engine,” as it was +called in those days, before King William III. and his court, +at Hampton Court, in 1698, and obtained his patent without +delay. The title of the patent reads: “A grant to +Thomas Savery, Gentl., of the sole exercise of a new invention +by him invented, for raising of water, and occasioning +motion to all sorts of mill-works, by the impellant force of +fire, which will be of great use for draining mines, serving +towns with water, and for the working of all sorts of mills, +when they have not the benefit of water nor constant winds; +to hold for 14 years; with usual clauses.”</p> + +<p>Savery now went about the work of introducing his invention +in a way which is in marked contrast with that +usually adopted by the inventors of that time. He commenced +a systematic and successful system of advertisement, +and lost no opportunity of making his plans not +merely known, but well understood, even in matters of detail. +The Royal Society was then fully organized, and at one +of its meetings he obtained permission to appear with his +model “fire-engine” and to explain its operation; and, as +the minutes read, “Mr. Savery entertained the Society with +showing his engine to raise water by the force of fire. He +was thanked for showing the experiment, which succeeded, +according to expectation, and was approved of.” He presented +to the Society a drawing and specifications of his +machine, and “The Transactions”<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" +class="fnanchor">[23]</a> contain a <a href="#Fig11">copperplate +engraving</a> and the description of his model. It consisted of +a furnace, <i>A</i>, heating a boiler, <i>B</i>, which was connected by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[34]</a></span> +pipes, <i>C C</i>, with two copper receivers, <i>D D</i>. There were +led from the bottom of these receivers branch pipes, <i>F F</i>, +which turned upward, and were united to form a rising +main, or “forcing-pipe,” <i>G</i>. +From the top of each receiver +was led a pipe, which was turned +downward, and these pipes united +to form a suction-pipe, which +was led down to the bottom of +the well or reservoir from which +the water was to be drawn. The +maximum lift allowable was +stated at 24 feet.</p> + +<p>The engine was worked as +follows: Steam is raised in the +boiler, <i>B</i>, and a cock, <i>C</i>, being +opened, a receiver, <i>D</i>, is filled +with steam. Closing the cock, +<i>C</i>, the steam condensing in the +receiver, a vacuum is created, and the pressure of the atmosphere +forces the water up, through the supply-pipe, +from the well into the receiver. Opening the cock, <i>C</i>, again, +the check-valve in the suction-pipe at <i>E</i> closes, the steam +drives the water out through the forcing-pipe, <i>G</i>, the clack-valve, +<i>E</i>, on that pipe opening before it, and the liquid is +expelled from the top of the pipe. The valve, <i>C</i>, is again +closed; the steam again condenses, and the engine is worked +as before. While one of the two receivers is discharging, +the other is filling, as in the machine of the Marquis of +Worcester, and thus the steam is drawn from the boiler +with tolerable regularity, and the expulsion of water takes +place with similar uniformity, the two systems of receivers +and pipes being worked alternately by the single boiler.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig12" id="Fig12"></a> +<img src="images/illo062.png" alt="Savery's Engine" width="350" height="328" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 12.</span>—Savery’s Engine, 1698.</p></div> + +<p>In another and still simpler little machine,<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" +class="fnanchor">[24]</a> which he<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[35]</a></span> +erected at Kensington (<a href="#Fig12">Fig. 12</a>), the same general plan +was adopted, combining a suction-pipe, <i>A</i>, 16 feet long +and 3 inches in diameter; a single receiver, <i>B</i>, capable +of containing 13 gallons; a boiler, <i>C</i>, of about 40 gallons +capacity; a forcing-pipe, <i>D</i>, 42 feet high, with the connecting +pipe and cocks, <i>E F G</i>; and the method of +operation was as already described, except that <i>surface-condensation</i> +was employed, the cock, <i>F</i>, being arranged +to shower water from the rising main over the receiver, +as shown. Of the first engine Switzer says: “I have +heard him say myself, that the very first time he played, +it was in a potter’s house at Lambeth, where, though it was +a small engine, yet it (the water) forced its way through +the roof, and struck off the tiles in a manner that surprised +all the spectators.”</p> + +<p>The Kensington engine cost £50, and raised 3,000 gallons +per hour, filling the receiver four times a minute, and +required a bushel of coal per day. Switzer remarks: “It +must be noted that this engine is but a small one in comparison +with many others that are made for coal-works; +but this is sufficient for any reasonable family, and other<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[36]</a></span> +uses required of it in watering all middling gardens.” He +cautions the operator: “When you have raised water +enough, and you design to leave off working the engine, +take away all the fire from under the boiler, and open the +cock (connected to the funnel) to let out the steam, which +would otherwise, were it to remain confined, perhaps burst +the engine.”</p> + +<p>With the intention of making his invention more generally +known, and hoping to introduce it as a pumping-engine +in the mining districts of Cornwall, Savery wrote a prospectus +for general circulation, which contains the earliest +account of the later and more effective form of engine. He +entitled his pamphlet “The Miner’s Friend; or, A Description +of an Engine to raise Water by Fire described, and the +Manner of fixing it in Mines, with an Account of the several +Uses it is applicable to, and an Answer to the Objections +against it.” It was printed in London in 1702, for +S. Crouch, and was distributed among the proprietors and +managers of mines, who were then finding the flow of water +at depths so great as, in some cases, to bar further progress. +In many cases, the cost of drainage left no satisfactory margin +of profit. In one mine, 500 horses were employed raising +water, by the then usual method of using horse-gins +and buckets.</p> + +<p>The approval of the King and of the Royal Society, and +the countenance of the mine-adventurers of England, were +acknowledged by the author, who addressed his pamphlet to +them.</p> + +<p>The engraving of the engine was reproduced, with the +description, in Harris’s “Lexicon Technicum,” 1704; in +Switzer’s “Hydrostatics,” 1729; and in Desaguliers’s “Experimental +Philosophy,” 1744.</p> + +<p>The sketch which here follows is a neater engraving of +the same machine. Savery’s engine is shown in <a href="#Fig13">Fig. 13</a>, +as described by Savery himself, in 1702, in “The Miner’s +Friend.”</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig13" id="Fig13"></a> +<img src="images/illo064.png" alt="Savery's Engine" width="350" height="493" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 13.</span>—Savery’s Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1702.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[37]</a></span><i>L</i> is the boiler in which steam is raised, and through +the pipes <i>O O</i> it is alternately let into the vessels <i>P P</i>.</p> + +<p>Suppose it to pass into the left-hand vessel first. The +valve <i>M</i> being closed, and <i>R</i> being opened, the water contained +in <i>P</i> is driven out and up the pipe <i>S</i> to the desired +height, where it is discharged.</p> + +<p>The valve <i>R</i> is then closed, and the valve in the pipe <i>O</i>; +the valve <i>M</i> is next opened, and condensing water is turned +upon the exterior of <i>P</i> by the cock <i>Y</i>, leading water from +the cistern <i>X</i>. As the steam contained in <i>P</i> is condensed, +forming a vacuum there, a fresh charge of water is driven +by atmospheric pressure up the pipe <i>T</i>.</p> + +<p>Meantime, steam from the boiler has been let into the +right-hand vessel <i>P</i>, the cock <i>W</i> having been first closed, +and <i>R</i> opened.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[38]</a></span>The charge of water is driven out through the lower +pipe and the cock <i>R</i>, and up the pipe <i>S</i> as before, while the +other vessel is refilling preparatory to acting in its turn.</p> + +<p>The two vessels are thus alternately charged and discharged, +as long as is necessary.</p> + +<p>Savery’s method of supplying his boiler with water was +at once simple and ingenious.</p> + +<p>The small boiler, <i>D</i>, is filled with water from any convenient +source, as from the stand-pipe, <i>S</i>. A fire is then +built under it, and, when the pressure of steam in <i>D</i> becomes +greater than in the main boiler, <i>L</i>, a communication +is opened between their lower ends, and the water passes, +under pressure, from the smaller to the larger boiler, which +is thus “fed” without interrupting the work. <i>G</i> and <i>N</i> +are <i>gauge-cocks</i>, by which the height of water in the boilers +is determined; they were first adopted by Savery.</p> + +<p>Here we find, therefore, the first really practicable and +commercially valuable steam-engine. Thomas Savery is +entitled to the credit of having been the first to introduce a +machine in which the power of heat, acting through the +medium of steam, was rendered generally useful.</p> + +<p>It will be noticed that Savery, like the Marquis of +Worcester, used a boiler separate from the water-reservoir.</p> + +<p>He added to the “water-commanding engine” of the +marquis the system of <i>surface-condensation</i>, by which he +was enabled to charge his vessels when it became necessary +to refill them; and added, also, the secondary boiler, which +enabled him to supply the working-boiler with water without +interrupting its work.</p> + +<p>The machine was thus made capable of working uninterruptedly +for a period of time only limited by its own decay.</p> + +<p>Savery never fitted his boilers with safety-valves, although +it was done earlier by Papin; and in deep mines +he was compelled to make use of higher pressures than his +rudely-constructed boilers could safely bear.</p> + +<p>Savery’s engine was used at a number of mines, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[39]</a></span> +also for supplying water to towns; some large estates, +country houses, and other private establishments, employed +them for the same purpose. They did not, however, come +into general use among the mines, because, according to +Desaguliers, they were apprehensive of danger from the +explosion of the boilers or receivers. As Desaguliers wrote +subsequently: “Savery made a great many experiments +to bring this machine to perfection, and did erect several +which raised water very well for gentlemen’s seats, but +could not succeed for mines, or supplying towns, where the +water was to be raised very high and in great quantities; +for then the steam required being boiled up to such a +strength as to be ready to tear all the vessels to pieces.” +“I have known Captain Savery, at York’s buildings, to +make steam eight or ten times stronger than common air; +and then its heat was so great that it would melt common +soft solder, and its strength so great as to blow open several +joints of the machine; so that he was forced to be at the +pains and charge to have all his joints soldered with spelter +or hard solder.”</p> + +<p>Although there were other difficulties in the application +of the Savery engine to many kinds of work, this was the +most serious one, and explosions did occur with fatal results. +The writer just quoted relates, in his “Experimental +Philosophy,” that a man who was ignorant of the nature +of the engine undertook to work a machine which Desaguliers +had provided with a safety-valve to avoid this very +danger, “and, having hung the weight at the further end of +the steelyard, in order to collect more steam in order to +make his work the quicker, he hung also a very heavy +plumber’s iron upon the end of the steelyard; the consequence +proved fatal; for, after some time, the steam, not +being able, with the safety-cock, to raise up the steelyard +loaded with all this unusual weight, burst the boiler with a +great explosion, and killed the poor man.” This is probably +the earliest record of a steam-boiler explosion.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[40]</a></span>Savery proposed to use his engine for driving mills; but +there is no evidence that he actually made such an application +of the machine, although it was afterward so applied by +others. The engine was not well adapted to the drainage of +surface-land, as the elevation of large quantities of water +through small heights required great capacity of receivers, +or compelled the use of several engines for each case. The +filling of the receivers, in such cases, also compelled the +heating of large areas of cold and wet metallic surfaces by +the steam at each operation, and thus made the work comparatively +wasteful of fuel. Where used in mines, they +were necessarily placed within 30 feet or less of the lowest +level, and were therefore exposed to danger of submergence +whenever, by any accident, the water should rise above +that level. In many cases this would result in the loss of +the engine, and the mine would remain “drowned,” unless +another engine should be procured to pump it out. Where +the mine was deep, the water was forced by the pressure +of steam from the level of the engine-station to the top of +the lift. This compelled the use of pressures of several +atmospheres in many cases; and a pressure of three atmospheres, +or about 45 pounds per square inch, was considered, +in those days, as about the maximum pressure allowable. +This difficulty was met by setting a separate engine +at every 60 or 80 feet, and pumping the water from one to +the other. If any one engine in the set became disabled, +the pumping was interrupted until that one machine could +be repaired. The size of Savery’s largest boilers was not +great, their maximum diameter not exceeding two and a +half feet. This made it necessary to provide several of his +engines, usually, for a single mine, and at each level. The +first cost and the expense of repairs were exceedingly serious +items. The expense and danger, either real or apparent, +were thus sufficient to deter many from their use, and +the old method of raising water by horse-power was adhered +to.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[41]</a></span>The consumption of fuel with these engines was very +great. The steam was not generated economically, as the +boilers used were of such simple forms as only could then +be produced, and presented too little heating surface to secure +a very complete transfer of heat from the gases of +combustion to the water within the boiler. This waste in +the generation of steam in these uneconomical boilers was +followed by still more serious waste in its application, without +expansion, to the expulsion of water from a metallic +receiver, the cold and wet sides of which absorbed heat +with the greatest avidity. The great mass of the liquid was +not, however, heated by the steam, and was expelled at the +temperature at which it was raised from below.</p> + +<p>Savery quaintly relates the action of his machine in “The +Miner’s Friend,” and so exactly, that a better description +could scarcely be asked: “The steam acts upon the surface +of the water in the receiver, which surface only being heated +by the steam, it does not condense, but the steam gravitates +or presses with an elastic quality like air, and still increasing +its elasticity or spring, until it counterpoises, or rather exceeds, +the weight of the column of water in the force-pipe, +which then it will necessarily drive up that pipe; the steam +then takes some time to recover its power, but it will at last +discharge the water out at the top of the pipe. You may +see on the outside of the receiver how the water goes out, +as well as if it were transparent; for, so far as the steam is +contained within the vessel, it is dry without, and so hot as +scarcely to endure the least touch of the hand; but so far +as the water is inside the vessel, it will be cold and wet on +the outside, where any water has fallen on it; which cold +and moisture vanish as fast as the steam takes the place of +the water in its descent.”</p> + +<p>After Savery’s death, in 1716, several of these engines +were erected in which some improvements were introduced. +Dr. Desaguliers, in 1718, built a Savery engine, in which he +avoided some defects which he, with Dr. Gravesande, had<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[42]</a></span> +noted two years earlier. They had then proposed to adopt +the arrangement of a single receiver which had been used +by Savery himself, as already described, finding, by experiment +on a model which they had made for the purpose, +that one could be discharged three times, while the same +boiler would empty two receivers but once each. In their +arrangement, the steam was shut back in the boiler while +the receiver was filling with water, and a high pressure thus +accumulated, instead of being turned into the second receiver, +and the pressure thus kept comparatively low.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig14" id="Fig14"></a> +<img src="images/illo069.png" alt="Papin's Two-Way Cock" width="350" height="280" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 14.</span>—Papin’s Two-Way Cock.</p></div> + +<p>In the engine built in 1718, Desaguliers used a spherical +boiler, which he provided with the lever safety-valve already +applied by Papin, and adopted a comparatively small receiver—one-fifth +the capacity of the boiler—of slender cylindrical +form, and attached a pipe leading the water for +condensation into the vessel, and effected its distribution by +means of the “rose,” or a “sprinkling-plate,” such as is still +frequently used in modern engines having jet-condensers. +This substitution of jet for surface-condensation was of +very great advantage, securing great promptness in the +formation of a vacuum and a rapid filling of the receiver. +A “<a href="#Fig14">two-way cock</a>” admitted steam to the receiver, or, +being turned the other way, admitted the cold condensing +water. The dispersion of the water in minute streams or +drops was a very important detail, not only as securing great<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[43]</a></span> +rapidity of condensation, but enabling the designer to employ +a comparatively small receiver or condenser.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig15" id="Fig15"></a> +<img src="images/illo070.png" alt="Desaguliers's Engine" width="350" height="424" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 15.</span>—Engine built by +Desaguliers in 1718.</p></div> + +<p>The engine is shown in <a href="#Fig15">Fig. 15</a>, which is copied from the +“Experimental Philosophy” of Desaguliers.</p> + +<p>The receiver, <i>A</i>, is connected to the boiler, <i>B</i>, by a +steam-pipe, <i>C</i>, terminating at the two-way cock, <i>D</i>; the +“forcing-pipe,” <i>E</i>, has at its foot a check-valve, <i>F</i>, and the +valve <i>G</i> is a similar check at the head of the suction-pipe. +<i>H</i> is a strainer, to prevent the ingress of chips or other +bodies carried to the pipe by the current; the cap above the +valves is secured by a bridle, or stirrup, and screw, <i>I</i>, and +may be readily removed to clear the valves or to renew +them; <i>K</i> is the handle of the two-way cock; <i>M</i> is the injection-cock, +and is kept open during the working of the +engine; <i>L</i> is the chimney-flue; <i>N</i> and <i>O</i> are gauge-cocks +fitted to pipes leading to the proper depths within the boiler, +the water-line being somewhere between the levels of their +lower ends; <i>P</i> is a lever safety-valve, as first used on the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[44]</a></span> +“Digester” of Papin; <i>R</i> is the reservoir into which the +water is pumped; <i>T</i> is the flue, leading spirally about the +boiler from the furnace, <i>V</i>, to the chimney; <i>Y</i> is a cock +fitted in a pipe through which the rising-main may be filled +from the reservoir, should injection-water be needed when +that pipe is empty.</p> + +<p>Seven of these engines were built, the first of which +was made for the Czar of Russia. Its boiler had a capacity +of “five or six hogsheads,” and the receiver, “holding one +hogshead,” was filled and emptied four times a minute. +The water was raised “by suction” 29 feet, and forced by +steam pressure 11 feet higher.</p> + +<p>Another engine built at about this time, to raise water +29 feet “by suction,” and to force it 24 feet higher, made +6 “strokes” per minute, and, when forcing water but 6 or +8 feet, made 8 or 9 strokes per minute. Twenty-five years +later a workman overloaded the safety-valve of this engine, +by placing the weight at the end and then adding “a very +heavy plumber’s iron.” The boiler exploded, killing the +attendant.</p> + +<p>Desaguliers says that one of these engines, capable of +raising ten tons an hour 38 feet, in 1728 or 1729, cost £80, +exclusive of the piping.</p> + +<p>Blakely, in 1766, patented an improved Savery engine, +in which he endeavored to avoid the serious loss due to condensation +of the steam by direct contact with the water, by +interposing a cushion of oil, which floated upon the water +and prevented the contact of the steam with the surface of +the water beneath it. He also used air for the same purpose, +sometimes in double receivers, one supported on the +other. These plans did not, however, prove satisfactory.</p> + +<p>Rigley, of Manchester, England, soon after erected +Savery engines, and applied them to the driving of mills, +by pumping water into reservoirs, from whence it returned +to the wells or ponds from which it had been raised, turning +water-wheels as it descended.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[45]</a></span>Such an arrangement was in operation many years at +the works of a Mr. Kiers, St. Pancras, London. It is described +in detail, and illustrated, in Nicholson’s “Philosophical +Journal,” vol. i., p. 419. It had a “wagon-boiler” +7 feet long, 5 wide, and 5 deep; the wheel was +18 feet in diameter, and drove the lathes and other +machinery of the works. In this engine Blakely’s plan +of injecting air was adopted. The injection-valve was +a clack, which closed automatically when the vacuum was +formed.</p> + +<p>The engine consumed 6 or 7 bushels of good coals, and +made 10 strokes per minute, raising 70 cubic feet of water +14 feet, and developing nearly 3 horse-power.</p> + +<p>Many years after Savery’s death, in 1774, Smeaton made +the first duty-trials of engines of this kind. He found that +an engine having a cylindrical receiver 16 inches in diameter +and 22 feet high, discharging the water raised 14 feet above +the surface of the water in the well, making 12 strokes, and +raising 100 cubic feet per minute, developed 2<span class="enum">2</span>∕<span class="denom">3</span> horse-power, +and consumed 3 hundredweight of coals in four +hours. Its duty was, therefore, 5,250,000 pounds raised one +foot per bushel of 84 pounds of coals, or 62,500 “foot-pounds” +of work per pound of fuel. An engine of slightly +greater size gave a duty about 5 per cent. greater.</p> + +<p>When Louis XIV. revoked the edict of Nantes, by +which Henry IV. had guaranteed protection to the Protestants +of France, the terrible persecutions at once commenced +drove from the kingdom some of its greatest men. Among +these was Denys Papin.</p> + +<p>It was at about this time that the influence of the atmospheric +pressure on the boiling-point began to be observed, +Dr. Hooke having found that the boiling-point was +a fixed temperature under the ordinary pressure of the atmosphere, +and the increase in temperature and pressure of +steam when confined having been shown by Papin with his +“Digester.”</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port3" id="Port3"></a> +<img src="images/illo073.png" alt="Denys Papin" width="350" height="411" /> +<p class="caption">Denys Papin.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[46]</a></span> +<span class="smcap"><a href="#Port3">Denys Papin</a></span> was of a family which had attached itself +to the Protestant Church; but he was given his education +in the school of the Jesuits at Blois, and there acquired his +knowledge of mathematics. His medical education was +given him at Paris, although he probably received his degree +at Orleans. He settled in Paris in 1672, with the +intention of practising his profession, and devoted all his +spare time, apparently, to the study of physics.</p> + +<p>Meantime, that distinguished philosopher, Huyghens, +the inventor of the clock and of the gunpowder-engine, had +been induced by the linen-draper’s apprentice, Colbert, now +the most trusted adviser of the king, to take up his residence +in Paris, and had been made one of the earliest members +of the Academy of Science, which was founded at +about that time. Papin became an assistant to Huyghens,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[47]</a></span> +and aided him in his experiments in mechanics, having +been introduced by Madame Colbert, who was also a native +of Blois. Here he devised several modifications of the instruments +of Guericke, and printed a description of them.<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> +This little book was presented to the Academy, and very +favorably noticed. Papin now became well known among +contemporary men of science at Paris, and was well received +everywhere. Soon after, in the year 1675, as stated +by the <i>Journal des Savants</i>, he left Paris and took up his +residence in England, where he very soon made the acquaintance +of Robert Boyle, the founder, and of the members +of the Royal Society. Boyle speaks of Papin as having +gone to England in the hope of finding a place in which he +could satisfactorily pursue his favorite studies.</p> + +<p>Boyle himself had already been long engaged in the +study of pneumatics, and had been especially interested in +the investigations which had been original with Guericke. +He admitted young Papin into his laboratory, and the +two philosophers worked together at these attractive problems. +It was while working with Boyle that Papin invented +the double air-pump and the air-gun.</p> + +<p>Papin and his work had now become so well known, +and he had attained so high a position in science, that he +was nominated for membership in the Royal Academy, and +was elected December 16, 1680. He at once took his place +among the most talented and distinguished of the great +men of his time.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig16" id="Fig16"></a> +<img src="images/illo075.png" alt="Digester" width="350" height="415" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 16.</span>—Papin’s Digester, 1680.</p></div> + +<p>He probably invented his “Digester” while in England, +and it was first described in a brochure written in English, +under the title, “The New Digester.” It was subsequently +published in Paris.<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> +This was a vessel, <i>B</i> (<a href="#Fig16">Fig. 16</a>), capable +of being tightly closed by a screw, <i>D</i>, and a lid, <i>C</i>, in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[48]</a></span> +which food could be cooked in water raised by a furnace, +<i>A</i>, to the temperature due to any desired safe pressure of +steam. The pressure was determined and limited by a +weight, <i>W</i>, on the safety-valve lever, <i>G</i>. It is probable that +this essential attachment to the steam-boiler had previously +been used for other purposes; but Papin is given the +credit of having first made use of it to control the pressure +of steam.</p> + +<p>From England, Papin went to Italy, where he accepted +membership and held official position in the Italian Academy +of Science. Papin remained in Venice two years, and +then returned to England. Here, in 1687, he announced one +of his inventions, which is just becoming of great value in the +arts. He proposed to transmit power from one point to another, +over long distances, by the now well-known “pneumatic” +method. At the point where power was available,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[49]</a></span> +he exhausted a chamber by means of an air-pump, and, leading +a pipe to the distant point at which it was to be utilized, +there withdrew the air from behind a piston, and the pressure +of the air upon the latter caused it to recede into the +cylinder, in which it was fitted, raising a weight, of which +the magnitude was proportionate to the size of the piston +and the degree of exhaustion. Papin was not satisfactorily +successful in his experiments; but he had created the germ +of the modern system of pneumatic transmission of power. +His disappointment at the result of his efforts to utilize +the system was very great, and he became despondent, and +anxious to change his location again.</p> + +<p>In 1687 he was offered the chair of Mathematics at +Marburg by Charles, the Landgrave of Upper Hesse, and, +accepting the appointment, went to Germany. He remained +in Germany many years, and continued his researches with +renewed activity and interest. His papers were published +in the “Acta Eruditorum” at Leipsic, and in the “Philosophical +Transactions” at London. It was while at Marburg +that his papers descriptive of his method of pneumatic +transmission of power were printed.<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a></p> + +<p>In the “Acta Eruditorum” of 1688 he exhibited a practicable +plan, in which he exhausted the air from a set of +engines or pumps by means of pumps situated at a long distance +from the point of application of the power, and at the +place where the prime mover—which was in this case a +water-wheel—was erected.</p> + +<p>After his arrival at the University of Marburg, Papin +exhibited to his colleagues in the faculty a modification of +Huyghens’s gunpowder-engine, in which he had endeavored +to obtain a more perfect vacuum than had Huyghens in the +first of these machines. Disappointed in this, he finally +adopted the expedient of employing steam to displace the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[50]</a></span> +air, and to produce, by its condensation, the perfect vacuum +which he sought; and he thus produced <i>the first steam-engine +with a piston</i>, and the first piston steam-engine, in which +condensation was produced to secure a vacuum. It was described +in the “Acta” of Leipsic,<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> in June, 1690, under the +title, “Nova Methodus ad vires motrices validissimas leri +pretio comparandeo” (“A New Method of securing cheaply +Motive Power of considerable Magnitude”). He describes +first the gunpowder-engine, and continues by stating that, +“until now, all experiments have been unsuccessful; and +after the combustion of the exploded powder, there always +remains in the cylinder about one-fifth its volume of air.” +He says that he has endeavored to arrive by another route +at the same end; and “as, by a natural property of water, +a small quantity of this liquid, vaporized by the action of +heat, acquires an elasticity like that of the air, and returns +to the liquid state again on cooling, without retaining the +least trace of its elastic force,” he thought that it would be +easy to construct machines in which, “by +means of a moderate heat, and without +much expense,” a more perfect vacuum +could be produced than could be secured +by the use of gunpowder.</p> + +<div class="figleft"><a name="Fig17" id="Fig17"></a> +<img src="images/illo077.png" alt="Papin's Engine" width="183" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 17.</span>—Papin’s Engine.</p></div> + +<p>The first machine of Papin (<a href="#Fig17">Fig. 17</a>) +was very similar to the gunpowder-engine +already described as the invention +of Huyghens. In place of gunpowder, a +small quantity of water is placed at the +bottom of the cylinder, <i>A</i>; a fire is built +beneath it, “the bottom being made of +very thin metal,” and the steam formed +soon raises the piston, <i>B</i>, to the top, +where a latch, <i>E</i>, engaging a notch in +the piston-rod, <i>H</i>, holds it up until it is desired that it shall<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[51]</a></span> +drop. The fire being removed, the steam condenses, and a +vacuum is formed below the piston, and the latch, <i>E</i>, being +disengaged, the piston is driven down by the superincumbent +atmosphere and raises the weight which has been, meantime, +attached to a rope, <i>L</i>, passing from the piston-rod over pulleys, +<i>T T</i>. The machine had a cylinder two and a half inches +in diameter, and raised 60 pounds once a minute; and +Papin calculated that a machine of a little more than two +feet diameter of cylinder and of four feet stroke would raise +8,000 pounds four feet per minute—i. e., that it would yield +about one horse-power.</p> + +<p>The inventor claimed that this new machine would be +found useful in relieving mines from water, in throwing +bombs, in ship-propulsion, attaching revolving paddles—i. e., +paddle-wheels—to the sides of the vessel, which wheels were +to be driven by several of his engines, in order to secure +continuous motion, the piston-rods being fitted with racks +which were to engage ratchet-wheels on the paddle-shafts.</p> + +<p>“The principal difficulty,” he says, answering anticipated +objections, “is that of making these large cylinders.”</p> + +<p>In a reprint describing his invention, in 1695, Papin +gives a description of a “newly-invented furnace,” a kind +of fire-box steam-boiler, in which the fire, completely surrounded +by water, makes steam so rapidly that his engine +could be driven at the rate of four strokes per minute by +the steam supplied by it.</p> + +<p>Papin also proposed the use of a peculiar form of furnace +with this engine, which, embodying as it does some +suggestions that very probably have since been attributed +to later inventors, deserves special notice. In this furnace, +Papin proposed to burn his fuel on a grate within a furnace +arranged with a <i>down-draught</i>, the air entering above the +grate, passing <i>down</i> through the fire, and from the ash-pit +through a side flue to the chimney. In starting the fire, +the coal was laid on the grate, covered with wood, and the +latter was ignited, the flame, passing downward through the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[52]</a></span> +coal, igniting that in turn, and, as claimed by Papin, the +combustion was complete, and the formation of smoke was +entirely prevented. He states, in “Acta Eruditorum,” +that the heat was intense, the saving of fuel very great, +and that the only difficulty was to find a refractory material +which would withstand the high temperature attained.</p> + +<p>This is the first fire-box and flue boiler of which we have +record. The experiment is supposed to have led Papin to +suggest the use of a hot-blast, as practised by Neilson more +than a century later, for reducing metals from their ores.</p> + +<p>Papin made another boiler having a flue winding through +the water-space, and presenting a heating surface of nearly +80 square feet. The flue had a length of 24 feet, and +was about 10 inches square. It is not stated what were +the maximum pressures carried on these boilers; but it +is known that Papin had used very high pressures in his +digesters—probably between 1,200 and 1,500 pounds per +square inch.</p> + +<p>In the year 1705, Leibnitz, then visiting England, had +seen a Savery engine, and, on his return, described it to +Papin, sending him a sketch of the machine. Papin read +the letter and exhibited the sketch to the Landgrave of +Hesse, and Charles at once urged him to endeavor to perfect +his own machine, and to continue the researches which he +had been intermittently pursuing since the earlier machine +had been exhibited in public.</p> + +<p>In a small pamphlet printed at Cassel in 1707,<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" +class="fnanchor">[29]</a> Papin +describes a new form of engine, in which he discards the +original plan of a modified Huyghens engine, with tight-fitting +piston and cylinder, raising its load by indirect action, +and makes a modified Savery engine, which he calls +the “Elector’s Engine,” in honor of his patron. This is +the engine shown in the engraving, and as proposed to be +used by him in turning a water-wheel.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig18" id="Fig18"></a> +<img src="images/illo080.png" alt="Papin's Engine with Water-Wheel" width="600" height="331" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 18.</span>—Papin’s Engine and Water-Wheel, +<span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1707.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[53]</a></span>The sketch is that given by the inventor in his memoir. +It consists (<a href="#Fig18">Fig. 18</a>) of a steam-boiler, <i>a</i>, from which steam is +led through the cock, <i>c</i>, to the working cylinder, <i>n n</i>. The water +beneath the floating-piston, <i>h</i>, which latter serves simply as +a cushion to protect the steam from sudden condensation or +contact with the water, is forced into the vessel <i>r r</i>, which +is a large air-chamber, and which serves to render the outflow +of water comparatively uniform, and the discharge occurs +by means of the pipe <i>q</i>, from which the water rises to +the desired height. A fresh supply of water is introduced +through the funnel <i>k</i>, after condensation of the steam in <i>n n</i>, +and the operation of expulsion is repeated.</p> + +<p>This machine is evidently a retrogression, and Papin, +after having earned the honor of having invented the first +steam-engine of the typical form which has since become +so universally applied, forfeited that credit by his evident +ignorance of its superiority over existing devices, and by +attempting unsuccessfully to perfect the inferior device of +another inventor.</p> + +<p>Subsequently, Papin made an attempt to apply the +steam-engine to the propulsion of vessels, the account of +which will be given in the chapter on Steam-Navigation.</p> + +<p>Again disappointed, Papin once more visited England,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[54]</a></span> +to renew his acquaintance with the <i>savans</i> of the Royal +Society; but Boyle had died during the period which Papin +had spent in Germany, and the unhappy and disheartened +inventor and philosopher died in 1810, without having +seen any one of his many devices and ingenious inventions +a practical success.</p> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label"> [6]</span></a> +The British Museum contains four manuscript copies of Hero’s “Pneumatics,” +which were written in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. These +manuscripts have been examined with great care, and a translation from +them prepared by Prof. J. G. Greenwood, and published at the desire +of Mr. Bennett Woodcroft, the author of a valuable little treatise on +“Steam Navigation.” This is, so far as the author is aware, the only +existing English translation of any portion of Hero’s works.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label"> [7]</span></a> +Stuart’s “Anecdotes.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label"> [8]</span></a> +“Berg-Postilla, oder Sarepta von Bergwerk und Metallen.” Nuremberg, +1571.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label"> [9]</span></a> +“History of the Steam-Engine,” 1825.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> +“Theatrum Instrumentorum et Machinarum, Jacobi Bessoni, cum +Franc Beroaldus, figuarum declaratione demonstrativa.” Lugduni, 1578.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> +“Le diverse et artificiose machine del Capitano Agostino Ramelli, +del Ponte della Prefia.” Paris, 1588.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> +“Pneumaticorum libri tres,” etc., 4to. Naples, 1601. “I Tre Libri +de’ Spiritali.” Napoli, 1606.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> +“Le Machine deverse del Signior Giovanni Branca, cittadino Romano, +Ingegniero, Architetto della Sta. Casa di Loretto.” Roma, MDCXXIX.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> +Rymer’s “Fœdera,” Sanderson. Ewbank’s “Hydraulics,” +p. 419.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> +“Anecdotes of the Steam-Engine,” vol. i., p. 61.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> +Stuart’s “Anecdotes.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> +“Pendule Perpetuelle, avec la manière d’élever d’eau par le moyen de +la poudre à canon,” Paris, 1678.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> +“Elevation des Eaux par toute sorte de Machines réduite à la Mesure +au Poids et à la Balance, présentée a Sa Majesté Très Chrétienne, par le +Chevalier Morland, Gentilhomme Ordinaire de la Chambre Privée et Maistre +de Mechaniques du Roy de la Grande Bretagne, 1683.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> +“Les Principes de la Nouvelle Force de Feu, inventée par le Chevalier +Morland, l’an 1682, et présentée a Sa Majesté Très Chrétienne, 1683.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> +Harris, “Lexicon Technicum,” London, 1710.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> +“Navigation Improved; or, The Art of Rowing Ships of all rates in +Calms, with a more Easy, Swift, and Steady Motion, than Oars can,” etc., +etc. By Thomas Savery, Gent. London, 1698.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> +“Experimental Philosophy,” vol. ii., p. 465.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> +“Philosophical Transactions, No. 252.” Weld’s “Royal Society,” vol. +i., p. 357. Lowthorp’s “Abridgment,” vol. i.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> +Bradley, “New Improvements of Planting and Gardening.” Switzer, +“Hydrostatics,” 1729.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> +“Nouvelles Expériences du Vuide, avec la description des Machines +qui servent à le faire.” Paris, 1674.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> +“La manière d’amollir les os et de faire cuire toutes sortes de viandes,” +etc.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> +“Recueil des diverses Pieces touchant quelques Nouvelles Machines et +autres Sujets Philosophiques,” M. D. Papin. Cassel, 1695.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> +“Acta Eruditorum,” Leipsic, 1690.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> +“Nouvelle manière d’élever l’Eau par la Force du Feu, mis en Lumière,” +par D. Papin. Cassel, 1707.</p></div> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<p> </p> +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/illo081.png" alt="Ornament" width="200" height="272" /></div> +<p> </p> + +<hr class="c40" /><p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[55]</a></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_II" id="CHAPTER_II"></a>CHAPTER II.</h2> + +<h3><i>THE STEAM-ENGINE AS A TRAIN OF MECHANISM.</i></h3> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“The introduction of new Inventions seemeth to be the very chief of +all human Actions. The Benefits of new Inventions may extend to all +Mankind universally; but the Good of political Achievements can respect +but some particular Cantons of Men; these latter do not endure above a +few Ages, the former forever. Inventions make all Men happy, without +either Injury or Damage to any one single Person. Furthermore, new +Inventions are, as it were, new Erections and Imitations of God’s own +Works.”—<span class="smcap">Bacon.</span></p></div> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<h4><span class="smcap">The Modern Type, as Developed by Newcomen, +Beighton, and Smeaton.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>At the beginning of the eighteenth century every element +of the modern type of steam-engine had been separately +invented and practically applied. The character of +atmospheric pressure, and of the pressure of gases, had become +understood. The nature of a vacuum was known, +and the method of obtaining it by the displacement of the +air by steam, and by the condensation of the vapor, was +understood. The importance of utilizing the power of steam, +and the application of condensation in the removal of atmospheric +pressure, was not only recognized, but had been +actually and successfully attempted by Morland, Papin, +and Savery.</p> + +<p>Mechanicians had succeeded in making steam-boilers +capable of sustaining any desired or any useful pressure, +and Papin had shown how to make them comparatively safe<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[56]</a></span> +by the attachment of the safety-valve. They had made +steam-cylinders fitted with pistons, and had used such a +combination in the development of power.</p> + +<p>It now only remained for the engineer to combine known +forms of mechanism in a practical machine which should be +capable of economically and conveniently utilizing the power +of steam through the application of now well-understood +principles, and by the intelligent combination of physical +phenomena already familiar to scientific investigators.</p> + +<p>Every essential fact and every vital principle had been +learned, and every one of the needed mechanical combinations +had been successfully effected. It was only requisite +that an inventor should appear, capable of perceiving that +these known facts and combinations of mechanism, properly +illustrated in a working machine, would present to the +world its greatest physical blessing.</p> + +<p>The defects of the simple engines constructed up to this +time have been noted as each has been described. None of +them could be depended upon for safe, economical, and continuous +work. Savery’s was the most successful of all. But +the engine of Savery, even with the improvements of Desaguliers, +was unsafe where most needed, because of the +high pressures necessarily carried in its boilers when pumping +from considerable depths; it was uneconomical, in consequence +of the great loss of heat in its forcing-cylinders +when the hot steam was surrounded at its entrance by colder +bodies; it was slow in operation, of great first cost, and +expensive in first cost and in repairs, as well as in its operation. +It could not be relied upon to do its work uninterruptedly, +and was thus in many respects a very unsatisfactory +machine.</p> + +<p>The man who finally effected a combination of the elements +of the modern steam-engine, and produced a machine +which is unmistakably a true engine—i. e., a train of mechanism +consisting of several elementary pieces combined in +a train capable of transmitting a force applied at one end<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[57]</a></span> +and of communicating it to the resistance to be overcome +at the other end—was <span class="smcap">Thomas Newcomen</span>, an “iron-monger” +and blacksmith of Dartmouth, England. The engine +invented by him, and known as the “Atmospheric Steam-Engine,” +is the first of an entirely new type.</p> + +<p>The old type of engine—the steam-engine as a simple +machine—had been given as great a degree of perfection, +by the successive improvements of Worcester, Savery, and +Desaguliers, as it was probably capable of attaining by any +modification of its details. The next step was necessarily +a complete change of type; and to effect such a change, it +was only necessary to combine devices already known and +successfully tried.</p> + +<p>But little is known of the personal history of Newcomen. +His position in life was humble, and the inventor +was not then looked upon as an individual of even possible +importance in the community. He was considered as one +of an eccentric class of schemers, and of an order which, +concerning itself with mechanical matters, held the lowest +position in the class.</p> + +<p>It is supposed that Savery’s engine was perfectly well +known to Newcomen, and that the latter may have visited +Savery at his home in Modbury, which was but fifteen +miles from the residence of Newcomen. It is thought, by +some biographers of these inventors, that Newcomen was +employed by Savery in making the more intricate forgings +of his engine. Harris, in his “Lexicon Technicum,” states +that drawings of the engine of Savery came into the hands +of Newcomen, who made a model of the machine, set it up +in his garden, and then attempted its improvement; but +Switzer says that Newcomen “was as early in his invention +as Mr. Savery was in his.”</p> + +<p>Newcomen was assisted in his experiments by John Calley, +who, with him, took out the patent. It has been stated +that a visit to Cornwall, where they witnessed the working +of a Savery engine, first turned their attention to the subject;<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[58]</a></span> +but a friend of Savery has stated that Newcomen +was as early with his general plans as Savery.</p> + +<p>After some discussion with Calley, Newcomen entered +into correspondence with Dr. Hooke, proposing a steam-engine +to consist of a <i>steam-cylinder containing a piston +similar to that of Papin’s, and to drive a separate pump</i>, +similar to those generally in use where water was raised by +horse or wind power. Dr. Hooke advised and argued strongly +against their plan, but, fortunately, the obstinate belief +of the unlearned mechanics was not overpowered by the +disquisitions of their distinguished correspondent, and Newcomen +and Calley attempted an engine on their peculiar +plan. This succeeded so well as to induce them to continue +their labors, and, in 1705, to patent,<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> in combination with +Savery—who held the exclusive right to practise surface-condensation, +and who induced them to allow him an interest +with them—an engine combining a steam-cylinder and +piston, surface-condensation, a separate boiler, and separate +pumps.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig19" id="Fig19"></a> +<img src="images/illo086.png" alt="Newcomen's Engine" width="400" height="455" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 19.</span>—Newcomen’s Engine, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1705.</p></div> + +<p>In the atmospheric-engine, as first designed, the slow +process of condensation by the application of the condensing +water to the exterior of the cylinder, to produce the +vacuum, caused the strokes of the engine to take place at +very long intervals. An improvement was, however, soon +effected, which immensely increased the rapidity of condensation. +A jet of water was thrown directly <i>into</i> the +cylinder, thus effecting for the Newcomen engine just +what Desaguliers had done for the Savery engine previously. +As thus improved, the Newcomen engine is shown +in <a href="#Fig19">Fig. 19</a>.</p> + +<p>Here <i>b</i> is the boiler. Steam passes from it through the +cock, <i>d</i>, and up into the cylinder, <i>a</i>, equilibrating the pressure +of the atmosphere, and allowing the heavy pump-rod, <i>k</i>, to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[59]</a></span> +fall, and, by the greater weight acting through the beam, <i>i i</i>, +to raise the piston, <i>s</i>, to the position shown. The rod <i>m</i> carries +a counterbalance, if needed. The cock <i>d</i> being shut, <i>f</i> +is then opened, and a jet of water from the reservoir, <i>g</i>, enters +the cylinder, producing a vacuum by the condensation +of the steam. The pressure of the air above the piston now +forces it down, again raising the pump-rods, and thus the +engine works on indefinitely.</p> + +<p>The pipe <i>h</i> is used for the purpose of keeping the upper +side of the piston covered with water, to prevent air-leaks—a +device of Newcomen. Two gauge-cocks, <i>c c</i>, and a safety-valve, +<i>N</i>, are represented in the figure, but it will be noticed +that the latter is quite different from the now usual form. +Here, the pressure used was hardly greater than that of the +atmosphere, and the weight of the valve itself was ordinarily +sufficient to keep it down. The condensing water, together +with the water of condensation, flows off through +the open pipe <i>p</i>. Newcomen’s first engine made 6 or 8<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[60]</a></span> +strokes a minute; the later and improved engines made 10 +or 12.</p> + +<p>The steam-engine has now assumed a form that somewhat +resembles the modern machine.</p> + +<p>The Newcomen engine is seen at a glance to have been +a combination of earlier ideas. It was the engine of Huyghens, +with its cylinder and piston as improved by Papin, +by the substitution of steam for the gases generated by the +explosion of gunpowder; still further improved by Newcomen +and Calley by the addition of the method of condensation +used in the Savery engine. It was further modified, +with the object of applying it directly to the working +of the pumps of the mines by the introduction of the overhead +beam, from which the piston was suspended at one +end and the pump-rod at the other.</p> + +<p>The advantages secured by this combination of inventions +were many and manifest. The piston not only gave +economy by interposing itself between the impelling and +the resisting fluid, but, by affording opportunity to make +the area of piston as large as desired, it enabled Newcomen +to use any convenient pressure and any desired proportions +for any proposed lift. The removal of the water to be +lifted from the steam-engine proper and handling it with +pumps, was an evident cause of very great economy of +steam.</p> + +<p>The disposal of the water to be raised in this way also +permitted the operations of condensation of steam, and the +renewal of pressure on the piston, to be made to succeed +each other with rapidity, and enabled the inventor to choose, +unhampered, the device for securing promptly the action of +condensation.</p> + +<p>Desaguliers, in his account of the introduction of the +engine of Newcomen, says that, with his coadjutor Calley, +he “made several experiments in private about the year +1710, and in the latter end of the year 1711 made proposals +to drain the water of a colliery at Griff, in Warwickshire,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[61]</a></span> +where the proprietors employed 500 horses, at an expense +of £900 a year; but, their invention not meeting with the +reception they expected, in March following, through the +acquaintance of Mr. Potter, of Bromsgrove, in Worcestershire, +they bargained to draw water for Mr. Back, of +Wolverhampton, where, after a great many laborious attempts, +they did make the engine work; but, not being +either philosophers to understand the reason, or mathematicians +enough to calculate the powers and proportions of +the parts, they very luckily, by accident, found what they +sought for.</p> + +<p>“They were at a loss about the pumps, but, being so +near Birmingham, and having the assistance of so many admirable +and ingenious workmen, they came, about 1712, to +the method of making the pump-valves, clacks, and buckets, +whereas they had but an imperfect notion of them before. +One thing is very remarkable: as they were at first working, +they were surprised to see the engine go several strokes, +and very quick together, when, after a search, they found a +hole in the piston, which let the cold water in to condense +the steam in the inside of the cylinder, whereas, before, they +had always done it on the outside. They used before to +work with a buoy to the cylinder, inclosed in a pipe, which +buoy rose when the steam was strong and opened the injection, +and made a stroke; thereby they were only capable +of giving 6, 8, or 10 strokes in a minute, till a boy, named +Humphrey Potter, in 1713, who attended the engine, added +(what he called a <i>scoggan</i>) a catch, that the beam always +opened, and then it would go 15 or 16 strokes a minute. +But, this being perplexed with catches and strings, Mr. +Henry Beighton, in an engine he had built at Newcastle-upon-Tyne +in 1718, took them all away but the beam itself, +and supplied them in a much better manner.”</p> + +<p>In illustration of the application of the Newcomen engine +to the drainage of mines, Farey describes a small +machine, of which the pump is 8 inches in diameter, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[62]</a></span> +the lift 162 feet. The column of water to be raised weighed +3,535 pounds. The steam-piston was made 2 feet in diameter, +giving an area of 452 square inches. The net working-pressure +was assumed at 10<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> pounds per square inch; the +temperature of the water of condensation and of uncondensed +vapor after the entrance of the injection-water being +usually about 150° Fahr. This gave an excess of pressure +on the steam-side of 1,324 pounds, the total pressure on the +piston being 4,859 pounds. One-half of this excess is counterweighted +by the pump-rods, and by weight on that end +of the beam; and the weight, 662 pounds, acting on each +side alternately as a surplus, produced the requisite rapidity +of movement of the machine. This engine was said to +make 15 strokes per minute, giving a speed of piston of 75 +feet per minute, and the power exerted usefully was equivalent +to 265,125 pounds raised one foot high per minute. +As the horse-power is equivalent to 33,000 “foot-pounds” +per minute, the engine was of <span class="enum">265125</span>∕ +<span class="denom">33000</span> = 8.034—almost exactly +8 horse-power.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig20" id="Fig20"></a> +<img src="images/illo090.png" alt="Beighton's Valve Gear" width="350" height="491" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 20.</span>—Beighton’s Valve-Gear, <span class="smcap">a. d.</span> 1718.</p></div> + +<p>It is instructive to contrast this estimate with that made +for a Savery engine doing the same work. The latter would +have raised the water about 26 feet in its “suction-pipe,” +and would then have forced it, by the direct pressure of +steam, the remaining distance of 136 feet; and the steam-pressure +required would have been nearly 60 pounds per +square inch. With this high temperature and pressure, the +waste of steam by condensation in the forcing-vessels would +have been so great that it would have compelled the adoption +of two engines of considerable size, each lifting the +water one-half the height, and using steam of about 25 +pounds pressure. Potter’s rude valve-gear was soon improved +by Henry Beighton, in an engine which that talented +engineer erected at Newcastle-upon-Tyne in 1718, and in +which he substituted substantial materials for the cords, as +in <a href="#Fig20">Fig. 20</a>.</p> + +<p>In this sketch, <i>r</i> is a plug-tree, plug-rod, or plug-frame,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[63]</a></span> +as it is variously called, suspended from the great beam, +with which it rises and falls, bringing the pins <i>p</i> and <i>k</i>, at +the proper moment, in contact with the handles <i>k k</i> and <i>n n</i> +of the valves, moving them in the proper direction and to +the proper extent. A lever safety-valve is here used, at +the suggestion, it is said, of Desaguliers. The piston was +packed with leather or with rope, and lubricated with tallow.</p> + +<p>After the death of Beighton, the atmospheric engine of +Newcomen retained its then standard form for many years, +and came into extensive use in all the mining districts, particularly +in Cornwall, and was also applied occasionally to +the drainage of wet lands, to the supply of water to towns, +and it was even proposed by Hulls to be used for ship-propulsion.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[64]</a></span></p> + +<p>The proportions of the engines had been determined in a +hap-hazard way, and they were in many cases very unsafe. +John Smeaton, the most distinguished engineer of his time, +finally, in 1769, experimentally determined proper proportions, +and built several of these engines of very considerable +size. He built his engines with steam-cylinders of +greater length of stroke than had been customary, and gave +them such dimensions as, by giving a greater excess of +pressure on the steam-side, enabled him to obtain a greatly-increased +speed of piston. The first of his new style of engine +was erected at Long Benton, near Newcastle-upon-Tyne, +in 1774.</p> + +<p><a href="#Fig21">Fig. 21</a><a name="FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a> +illustrates its principal characteristic features. +The boiler is not shown.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig21" id="Fig21"></a> +<img src="images/illo092.png" alt="Smeaton's Newcomen Engine" width="284" height="450" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 21.</span>—Smeaton’s Newcomen Engine.</p> +<p class="center fsize80"><a href="images/large092.jpg">Large scale image.</a></p></div> + +<p>The steam is led to the engine through the pipe, <i>C</i>, and +is regulated by turning the cock in the receiver, <i>D</i>, which +connects with the steam-cylinder by the pipe, <i>E</i>, which +latter pipe rises a little way above the bottom of the cylinder, +<i>F</i>, in order that it may not drain off the injection-water +into the steam-pipe and receiver.</p> + +<p>The steam-cylinder, about ten feet in length, is fitted +with a carefully-made piston, <i>G</i>, having a flanch rising four +or five inches and extending completely around its circumference, +and nearly in contact with the interior surface of +the cylinder. Between this flanch and the cylinder is driven +a “packing” of oakum, which is held in place by weights; +this prevents the leakage of air, water, or steam, past the +piston, as it rises and falls in the cylinder at each stroke of +the engine. The chain and piston-rod connect the piston +to the beam, <i>I I</i>. The arch-heads at each end of the beam +keep the chains of the piston-rod and the pump-rods perpendicular +and in line.</p> + +<p>A “jack-head” pump, <i>N</i>, is driven by a small beam deriving +its motion from the plug-rod at <i>g</i>, raises the water<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[65]</a></span> +required for condensing the steam, and keeps the cistern, <i>O</i>, +supplied. This “jack-head cistern” is sufficiently elevated +to give the water entering the cylinder the velocity requisite +to secure prompt condensation. A waste-pipe carries away +any surplus water. The injection-water is led from the cistern +by the pipe, <i>P P</i>, which is two or three inches in diameter,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[66]</a></span> +and the flow of water is regulated by the injection-cock, +<i>r</i>. The cap at the end, <i>d</i>, is pierced with several holes, +and the stream thus divided rises in jets when admitted, +and, striking the lower side of the piston, the spray thus +produced very rapidly condenses the steam, and produces a +vacuum beneath the piston. The valve, <i>e</i>, on the upper end +of the injection-pipe, is a check-valve, to prevent leakage +into the engine when the latter is not in operation. The +little pipe, <i>f</i>, supplies water to the upper side of the piston, +and, keeping it flooded, prevents the entrance of air when +the packing is not perfectly tight.</p> + +<p>The “working-plug,” or plug-rod, <i>Q</i>, is a piece of timber +slit vertically, and carrying pins which engage the +handles of the valves, opening and closing them at the +proper times. The steam-cock, or regulator, has a handle, +<i>h</i>, by which it is moved. The iron rod, <i>i i</i>, or spanner, gives +motion to the handle, <i>h</i>.</p> + +<p>The vibrating lever, <i>k l</i>, called the <i>Y</i>, or the “tumbling-bob,” +moves on the pins, <i>m n</i>, and is worked by the levers, +<i>o p</i>, which in turn are moved by the plug-tree. When <i>o</i> +is depressed, the loaded end, <i>k</i>, is given the position seen in +the sketch, and the leg <i>l</i> of the <i>Y</i> strikes the spanner, <i>i i</i>, +and, opening the steam-valve, the piston at once rises as +steam enters the cylinder, until another pin on the plug-rod +raises the piece, <i>P</i>, and closes the regulator again. The +lever, <i>q r</i>, connects with the injection-cock, and is moved, +when, as the piston rises, the end, <i>q</i>, is struck by a pin on +the plug-rod, and the cock is opened and a vacuum produced. +The cock is closed on the descent of the plug-tree +with the piston. An eduction-pipe, <i>R</i>, fitted with a clock, +conveys away the water in the cylinder at the end of each +down-stroke; the water thus removed is collected in the +hot-well, <i>S</i>, and is used as feed-water for the boiler, to which +it is conveyed by the pipe <i>T</i>. At each down-stroke, while +the water passes out through <i>R</i>, the air which may have +collected in the cylinder is driven out through the “snifting-valve,” +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[67]</a></span> +<i>s</i>. The steam-cylinder is supported on strong +beams, <i>t t</i>; it has around its upper edge a guard, <i>v</i>, of lead, +which prevents the overflow of the water on the top of the +piston. The excess of this water flows away to the hot-well +through the pipe <i>W</i>.</p> + +<p>Catch-pins, <i>x</i>, are provided, to prevent the beam descending +too far should the engine make too long a stroke; two +wooden springs, <i>y y</i>, receive the blow. The great beam is +carried on sectors, <i>z z</i>, to diminish losses by friction.</p> + +<div class="figright"><a name="Fig22" id="Fig22"></a> +<img src="images/illo094.png" alt="Newcomen Engine Boiler" width="230" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 22.</span>—Boiler of Newcomen’s<br />Engine, 1768.</p></div> + +<p>The boilers of Newcomen’s earlier engines were made of +copper where in contact with the products of combustion, +and their upper parts were of lead. Subsequently, sheet-iron +was substituted. The steam-space in the boiler was +made of 8 or 10 times the capacity of the cylinder of the +engine. Even in Smeaton’s time, a chimney-damper was +not used, and the supply of steam was consequently very +variable. In the earlier engines, the +cylinder was placed on the boiler; +afterward, they were placed separately, +and supported on a foundation +of masonry. The injection or +“jack-head” cistern was placed from +12 to 30 feet above the engine, the +velocity due the greater altitude +being found to give the most perfect +distribution of the water and the +promptest condensation.</p> + +<p>Smeaton covered the lower side +of his steam-pistons with wooden +plank about 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> inches thick, in order +that it should absorb and waste less +heat than when the iron was directly +exposed to the steam. Mr. Beighton was the first to use the +water of condensation for feeding the boiler, taking it directly +from the eduction-pipe, or the “hot-well.” Where +only a sufficient amount of pure water could be obtained for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[68]</a></span> +feeding the boiler, and the injection-water was “hard,” Mr. +Smeaton applied a heater, immersed in the hot-well, through +which the feed passed, absorbing heat from the water of +condensation <i>en route</i> to the boiler. Farey first proposed +the use of the “coil-heater”—a pipe, or “worm,” which, +forming a part of the feed-pipe, was set in the hot-well.</p> + +<p>As early as 1743, the metal used for the cylinders was cast-iron. +The earlier engines had been fitted with brass cylinders. +Desaguliers recommended the iron cylinders, as being +smoother, thinner, and as having less capacity for heat than +those of brass.</p> + +<p>In a very few years after the invention of Newcomen’s +engine it had been introduced into nearly all large mines in +Great Britain; and many new mines, which could not have +been worked at all previously, were opened, when it was +found that the new machine could be relied upon to raise +the large quantities of water to be handled. The first engine +in Scotland was erected in 1720 at Elphinstone, in +Stirlingshire. One was put up in Hungary in 1723.</p> + +<p>The first mine-engine, erected in 1712 at Griff, was 22 +inches in diameter, and the second and third engines were +of similar size. That erected at Ansthorpe was 23 inches +in diameter of cylinder, and it was a long time before much +larger engines were constructed. Smeaton and others +finally made them as large as 6 feet in diameter.</p> + +<p>In calculating the lifting-power of his engines, Newcomen’s +method was “to square the diameter of the cylinder +in inches, and, cutting off the last figure, he called it +‘long hundredweights;’ then writing a cipher on the right +hand, he called the number on that side ‘odd pounds;’ this +he reckoned tolerably exact at a mean, or rather when the +barometer was above 30 inches, and the air heavy.” In +allowing for frictional and other losses, he deducted from +one-fourth to one-third. Desaguliers found the rule quite +exact. The usual mean pressure resisting the motion of +the piston averaged, in the best engines, about 8 pounds per<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[69]</a></span> +square inch of its area. The speed of the piston was from +150 to 175 feet per minute. The temperature of the hot-well +was from 145° to 175° Fahr.</p> + +<p>Smeaton made a number of test-trials of Newcomen +engines to determine their “duty”—i. e., to ascertain the +expenditure of fuel required to raise a definite quantity of +water to a stated height. He found an engine 10 inches in +diameter of cylinder, and of 3 feet stroke, could do work +equal to raising 2,919,017 pounds of water one foot high, +with a bushel of coals weighing 84 pounds.</p> + +<p>One of Smeaton’s larger engines, erected at Long Benton, +was 52 inches in diameter of cylinder and of 7 feet +stroke of piston, and made 12 strokes per minute. Its load +was equal to 7<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> pounds per square inch of piston-area, and +its effective capacity about 40 horse-power. Its duty was +9<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> millions of pounds raised one foot high per bushel of +coals. Its boiler evaporated 7.88 pounds of water per +pound of fuel consumed. It had 35 square feet of grate-surface +and 142 square feet of heating-surface beneath the +boilers, and 317 square feet in the flues—a total of 459 +square feet. The moving parts of this engine weighed +8<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons.</p> + +<p>Smeaton erected one of these engines at the Chasewater +mine, in Cornwall, in 1775, which was of very considerable +size. It was 6 feet in diameter of steam-cylinder, and had +a maximum stroke of piston of 9<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet. It usually worked +9 feet. The pumps were in three lifts of about 100 feet +each, and were 16<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> inches in diameter. Nine strokes were +made per minute. This engine replaced two others, of 64 +and of 62 inches diameter of cylinder respectively, and both +of 6 feet stroke. One engine at the lower lift supplied the +second, which was set above it. The lower one had pumps +18<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter, and raised the water 144 feet; the +upper engine raised the water 156 feet, by pumps 17<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches +in diameter. The later engine replacing them exerted 76<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> +horse-power. There were three boilers, each 15 feet in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[70]</a></span> +diameter, and having each 23 square feet of grate-surface. +The chimney was 22 feet high. The great beam, or “lever,” +of this engine was built up of 20 beams of fir in two sets, +placed side by side, and ten deep, strongly bolted together. +It was over 6 feet deep at the middle and 5 feet at the +ends, and was 2 feet thick. The “main centres,” or journals, +on which it vibrated were 8<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter and +8<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches long. The cylinder weighed 6<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons, and was +paid for at the rate of 28 shillings per hundredweight.</p> + +<p>By the end of the eighteenth century, therefore, the engine +of Newcomen, perfected by the ingenuity of Potter +and of Beighton, and by the systematic study and experimental +research of Smeaton, had become a well-established +form of steam-engine, and its application to raising water +had become general. The coal-mines of Coventry and of +Newcastle had adopted this method of drainage; and the tin +and the copper mines of Cornwall had been deepened, using, +for drainage, engines of the largest size.</p> + +<p>Some engines had been set up in and about London, the +scene of Worcester’s struggles and disappointments, where +they were used to supply water to large houses. Others +were in use in other large cities of England, where water-works +had been erected.</p> + +<p>Some engines had also been erected to drive mills indirectly +by raising water to turn water-wheels. This is said +by Farey to have been first practised in 1752, at a mill near +Bristol, and became common during the next quarter of a +century. Many engines had been built in England and +sent across the channel, to be applied to the drainage of +mines on the Continent. Belidor<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> +stated that the manufacture +of these “fire-engines” was exclusively confined to +England; and this remained true many years after his time. +When used for the drainage of mines, the engine usually +worked the ordinary lift or bucket pump; when employed<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[71]</a></span> +for water-supply to cities, the force or plunger pump was +often employed, the engine being placed below the level of +the reservoir. Dr. Rees states that this engine was in common +use among the collieries of England as early as 1725.</p> + +<p>The Edmonstone colliery was licensed, in 1725, to erect +an engine, not to exceed 28 inches diameter of cylinder and +9 feet stroke of piston, paying a royalty of £80 per annum +for eight years. This engine was built in Scotland, by +workmen sent from England, and cost about £1,200. Its +“great cost” is attributed to an extensive use of brass. +The workmen were paid their expenses and 15<i>s.</i> per week +as wages. The builders were John and Abraham Potter, +of Durham. An engine built in 1775, having a steam-cylinder +48 inches in diameter and of 7 feet stroke, cost about +£2,000.</p> + +<p>Smeaton found 57 engines at work near Newcastle in +1767, ranging in size from 28 to 75 inches in diameter of +cylinder, and of, collectively, about 1,200 horse-power. Fifteen +of these engines gave an average of 98 square inches +of piston to the horse-power, and the average duty was +5,590,000 pounds raised 1 foot high by 1 bushel (84 pounds) +of coal. The highest duty noted was 7.44 millions; the +lowest was 3.22 millions. The most efficient engine had a +steam-cylinder 42 inches in diameter; the load was equivalent +to 9<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> pounds per square inch of piston-area, and the +horse-power developed was calculated to be 16.7.</p> + +<p>Price, writing in 1778, says, in the Appendix to his +“Mineralogia Cornubiensis:” “Mr. Newcomen’s invention +of the fire-engine enabled us to sink our mines to twice the +depth we could formerly do by any other machinery. Since +this invention was completed, most other attempts at its +improvement have been very unsuccessful; but the vast +consumption of fuel in these engines is an immense drawback +on the profit of our mines, for every fire-engine of +magnitude consumes £3,000 worth of coals per annum. +This heavy tax amounts almost to a prohibition.”<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[72]</a></span></p> + +<p>Smeaton was given the description, in 1773, of a <i>stone</i> +boiler, which was used with one of these engines at a copper +mine at Camborne, in Cornwall. It contained three copper +flues 22 inches in diameter. The gases were passed through +these flues successively, finally passing off to the chimney. +This boiler was cemented with hydraulic mortar. It was +20 feet long, 9 feet wide, and 8<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet deep. It was heated +by the waste heat from the roasting-furnaces. This was +one of the earliest flue-boilers ever made.</p> + +<p>In 1780, Smeaton had a list of 18 large engines working +in Cornwall. The larger number of them were built +by Jonathan Hornblower and John Nancarron. At this +time, the largest and best-known pumping-engine for water-works +was at York Buildings, in Villiers Street, Strand, +London. It had been in operation since 1752, and was +erected beside one of Savery’s engines, built in 1710. It +had a steam-cylinder 45 inches in diameter, and a stroke +of piston of 8 feet, making 7<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> strokes per minute, and developing +35<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> horse-power. Its boiler was dome-shaped, +of copper, and contained a large central fire-box and a +spiral flue leading outward to the chimney. Another +somewhat larger machine was built and placed beside this +engine, some time previous to 1775. Its cylinder was 49 +inches in diameter, and its stroke 9 feet. It raised water +102 feet. This engine was altered and improved by Smeaton +in 1777, and continued in use until 1813.</p> + +<p>Smeaton, as early as 1765, designed a <i>portable</i> engine,<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id="FNanchor_33_33"></a><a +href="#Footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a> +in which he supported the machinery on a wooden frame +mounted on short legs and strongly put together, so that +the whole machine could be transported and set at work +wherever convenient.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig23" id="Fig23"></a> +<img src="images/illo100.png" alt="Smeaton's Portable-Engine Boiler" width="350" height="344" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 23.</span>—Smeaton’s Portable-Engine<br />Boiler, 1765.</p></div> + +<p>In place of the beam, a large pulley was used, over +which a chain was carried, connecting the piston with the +pump-rod, and the motion was similar to that given by the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[73]</a></span> +discarded beam. The wheel was supported on A-frames, +resembling somewhat the “gallows-frames” still used with +the beam-engines of American river-boats. The sills carrying +the two A’s supported the cylinder. The injection-cistern +was supported above the great pulley-wheel. The +valve-gearing and the injection-pump were worked by a +smaller wheel, mounted on the same axis with the larger +one. The boiler was placed apart from the engine, with +which it was connected by a steam-pipe, in which was +placed the “regulator,” or throttle-valve. The boiler (<a href="#Fig23">Fig. +23</a>) “was shaped like a large tea-kettle,” and contained a +fire-box, <i>B</i>, or internal furnace, of which the sides were +made of cast-iron. The fire-door, <i>C</i>, was placed on one +side and opposite the flue, <i>D</i>, through which the products of +combustion were led to the chimney, <i>E</i>; a short, large pipe, +<i>F</i>, leading downward from the furnace to the outside of the +boiler, was the ash-pit. The shell of the boiler, <i>A</i>, was made +of iron plate one-quarter of an inch thick. The steam-cylinder<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[74]</a></span> +of the engine was 18 inches in diameter, the stroke of +piston 6 feet, the great wheel 6<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter, and the +A-frames 9 feet high. The boiler was made 6 feet, the furnace +34 inches, and the grate 18 inches in diameter. The +piston was intended to make 10 strokes per minute, and the +engine to develop 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">8</span> horse-power.</p> + +<p>In 1773, Smeaton prepared plans for a pumping-engine +to be set up at Cronstadt, the port of St. Petersburg, to +empty the great dry dock constructed by Peter the Great +and Catherine, his successor. This great dock was begun +in 1719. It was large enough to dock ten of the ships of +that time, and had previously been imperfectly drained by +two great windmills 100 feet high. So imperfectly did they +do their work, that a <i>year</i> was required to empty the dock, +and it could therefore only be used once in each summer. +The engine was built at the Carron Iron Works, in England. +It had a cylinder 66 inches in diameter, and a stroke +of piston of 8<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet. The lift varied from 33 feet when +the dock was full to 53 feet when it was cleared of water. +The load on the engine averaged about 8<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">3</span> pounds per +square inch of piston-area. There were three boilers, each +10 feet in diameter, and 16 feet 4 inches high to the apex of +its hemispherical dome. They contained internal fire-boxes +with grates of 20 feet area, and were surrounded by flues +helically traversing the masonry setting. The engine was +started in 1777, and worked very successfully.</p> + +<p>The lowlands of Holland were, before the time of Smeaton, +drained by means of windmills. The uncertainty and +inefficiency of this method precluded its application to anything +like the extent to which steam-power has since been +utilized. In 1440, there were 150 inland lakes, or “<i>meers</i>,” +in that country, of which nearly 100, having an extent of +over 200,000 acres, have since been drained. The “Haarlemmer +Meer” alone covers nearly 50,000 acres, and forms +the basin of a drainage-area of between 200,000 and 300,000 +acres, receiving a rainfall of 54,000,000 tons, which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[75]</a></span> +must be raised 16 feet in discharging it. The beds of these +lakes are from 10 to 20 feet lower than the water-level in +the adjacent canals. In 1840, 12,000 windmills were still +employed in this work. In the following year, William II., +at the suggestion of a commission, decreed that only steam-engines +should be employed to do this immense work. Up +to this time the average consumption of fuel for the pumping-engines +in use is said to have been 20 pounds per hour +per horse-power.</p> + +<p>The first engine used was erected in 1777 and 1778, on +the Newcomen plan, to assist the 34 windmills employed to +drain a lake near Rotterdam. This lake covered 7,000 +acres, and its bed was 12 feet below the surface of the +river Meuse, which passes it, and empties into the sea in the +immediate neighborhood. The iron parts of the engine +were built in England, and the machine was put together in +Holland. The steam-cylinder was 52 inches in diameter, +and the stroke of piston 9 feet. The boiler was 18 feet in +diameter, and contained a double flue. The main beam was +27 feet long. The pumps were 6 in number, 3 cylindrical +and 3 having a square cross-section; 3 were of 6 feet and +3 of 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet stroke. Two pumps only were worked at high-tide, +and the others were added one at a time, as the tide +fell, until, at low-tide, all 6 were at work.</p> + +<p>The size of this engine, and the magnitude of its +work, seem insignificant when compared with the machinery +installed 60 years later to drain the Haarlemmer Meer, and +with the work done by the last. These engines are 12 feet +in diameter of cylinder and 10 feet stroke of piston, and +work—they are 3 in number—the one 11 pumps of 63 inches +diameter and 10 feet stroke, the others 8 pumps of +73 inches diameter and of the same length of stroke. The +modern engines do a “duty” of 75,000,000 to 87,000,000 +with 94 pounds of coal, consuming 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> pounds of coal per +hour and per horse-power.</p> + +<p>The first steam-engine applied to working the blowing-machinery<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[76]</a></span> +of a blast-furnace was erected at the Carron +Iron-Works, in Scotland, near Falkirk, in 1765, and proved +very unsatisfactory. Smeaton subsequently, in 1769 or +1770, introduced better machinery into these works and +improved the old engine, and this use of the steam-engine +soon became usual. This engine did its work indirectly, +furnishing water, by pumping, to drive the water-wheels +which worked the blowing-cylinders. Its steam-cylinder +was 6 feet in diameter, and the pump-cylinder 52 inches. +The stroke was 9 feet.</p> + +<p>A direct-acting engine, used as a blowing-engine, was not +constructed until about 1784, at which time a single-acting +blowing-cylinder, or air-pump, was placed at the “out-board” +end of the beam, where the pump-rod had been +attached. The piston of the air-cylinder was loaded with +the weights needed to force it down, expelling the air, and +the engine did its work in raising the loaded piston, the air-cylinder +filling as the piston rose. A large “accumulator” +was used to equalize the pressure of the expelled air. This +consisted of another air-cylinder, having a loaded piston +which was left free to rise and fall. At each expulsion of +air by the blowing-engine this cylinder was filled, the loaded +piston rising to the top. While the piston of the former +was returning, and the air-cylinder was taking in its charge +of air, the accumulator would gradually discharge the +stored air, the piston slowly falling under its load. This +piston was called the “floating piston,” or “fly-piston,” and +its action was, in effect, precisely that of the upper portion +of the common blacksmith’s bellows.</p> + +<p>Dr. Robison, the author of “Mechanical Philosophy,” +one of the very few works even now existing deserving such +a title, describes one of these engines<a name="FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> +as working in Scotland +in 1790. It had a steam-cylinder 40 or 44 inches in +diameter, a blowing-cylinder 60 inches in diameter, and the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[77]</a></span> +stroke of piston was 6 feet. The air-pressure was 2.77 +pounds per square inch as a maximum in the blowing-cylinder; +and the floating piston in the regulating-cylinder was +loaded with 2.63 pounds per square inch. Making 15 or +18 strokes per minute, this engine delivered about 1,600 +cubic feet of air, or 120<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> pounds in weight, per minute, +and developed 20 horse-power.</p> + +<p>At about the same date a change was made in the blowing-cylinder. +The air entered at the bottom, as before, but +was forced out at the top, the piston being fitted with +valves, as in the common lifting-pump, and the engine thus +being arranged to do the work of expulsion during the +down-stroke of the steam-piston.</p> + +<p>Four years later, the regulating-cylinder, or accumulator, +was given up, and the now familiar “water-regulator” +was substituted for it. This consists of a tank, usually of +sheet-iron, set open-end downward in a large vessel containing +water. The lower edge of the inner tank is supported +on piers a few inches above the bottom of the large +one. The pipe carrying air from the blowing-engine passes +above this water-regulator, and a branch-pipe is led down +into the inner tank. As the air-pressure varies, the level of +the water within the inverted tank changes, rising as pressure +falls at the slowing of the motion of the piston, and +falling as the pressure rises again while the piston is moving +with an accelerated velocity. The regulator, thus receiving +surplus air to be delivered when needed, greatly assists in +regulating the pressure. The larger the regulator, the more +perfectly uniform the pressure. The water-level outside +the inner tank is usually five or six feet higher than within +it. This apparatus was found much more satisfactory than +the previously-used regulator, and, with its introduction, the +establishment of the steam-engine as a blowing-engine for +iron-works and at blast-furnaces may be considered as having +been fully established.</p> + +<p>Thus, by the end of the third quarter of the eighteenth<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[78]</a></span> +century, the steam-engine had become generally introduced, +and had been applied to nearly all of the purposes for which +a single-acting engine could be used. The path which had +been opened by Worcester had been fairly laid out by Savery +and his contemporaries, and the builders of the Newcomen +engine, with such improvements as they had been able to effect, +had followed it as far as they were able. The real and +practical introduction of the steam-engine is as fairly attributable +to Smeaton as to any one of the inventors whose +names are more generally known in connection with it. As +a mechanic, he was unrivaled; as an engineer, he was head +and shoulders above any constructor of his time engaged in +general practice. There were very few important public +works built in Great Britain at that time in relation to +which he was not consulted; and he was often visited by +foreign engineers, who desired his advice with regard to +works in progress on the Continent.</p> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> +It has been denied that a patent was issued, but there is no doubt +that Savery claimed and received an interest in the new engine.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> A fac-simile of a sketch in Galloway’s “On the Steam-Engine,” etc.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> +“Architecture Hydraulique,” 1734.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> +Smeaton’s “Reports,” vol. i., p. 223.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> +“Encyclopædia Britannica,” 1st edition.</p></div> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<p> </p> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/illo105.png" alt="Ornament" width="250" height="284" /></div> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[79]</a></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III"></a>CHAPTER III.</h2> + +<h3><i>THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN STEAM-ENGINE. +JAMES WATT AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES.</i></h3> + +<hr class="c05" /> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The world is now entering upon the Mechanical Epoch. There is nothing +in the future more sure than the great triumphs which that epoch is to +achieve. It has already advanced to some glorious conquests. What miracles +of invention now crowd upon us! Look abroad, and contemplate the +infinite achievements of the steam-power.</p> + +<p>And yet we have only begun—we are but on the threshold of this +epoch.... What is it but the setting of the great distinctive seal upon the +nineteenth century?—an advertisement of the fact that society has risen to +occupy a higher platform than ever before?—a proclamation from the high +places, announcing honor, honor immortal, to the workmen who fill this +world with beauty, comfort, and power—honor to be forever embalmed in +history, to be perpetuated in monuments, to be written in the hearts of this +and succeeding generations!—<span class="smcap">Kennedy.</span></p></div> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<h4><span class="smcap">Section I.—James Watt and his Inventions.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>The success of the Newcomen engine naturally attracted +the attention of mechanics, and of scientific men as well, to +the possibility of making other applications of steam-power.</p> + +<p>The best men of the time gave much attention to the +subject, but, until James Watt began the work that has +made him famous, nothing more was done than to improve +the proportions and slightly alter the details of the Newcomen +and Calley engine, even by such skillful engineers as +Brindley and Smeaton. Of the personal history of the +earlier inventors and improvers of the steam-engine, very +little is ascertained; but that of Watt has become well +known.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port4" id="Port4"></a> +<img src="images/illo107.png" alt="James Watt" width="350" height="427" /> +<p class="caption">James Watt.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[80]</a></span> +<span class="smcap"><a href="#Port4">James Watt</a></span> was of an humble lineage, and was born +at Greenock, then a little Scotch fishing village, but now +a considerable and a busy town, which annually launches +upon the waters of the Clyde a fleet of steamships whose +engines are probably, in the aggregate, far more powerful +than were all the engines in the world at the date of Watt’s +birth, January 19, 1736. His grandfather, Thomas Watt, +of Crawfordsdyke, near Greenock, was a well-known mathematician +about the year 1700, and was for many years a +schoolmaster at that place. His father was a prominent +citizen of Greenock, and was at various times chief magistrate +and treasurer of the town. James Watt was a bright +boy, but exceedingly delicate in health, and quite unable to +attend school regularly, or to apply himself closely to either +study or play. His early education was given by his parents, +who were respectable and intelligent people, and the +tools borrowed from his father’s carpenter-bench served at<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[81]</a></span> +once to amuse him and to give him a dexterity and familiarity +with their use that must undoubtedly have been of +inestimable value to him in after-life.</p> + +<p>M. Arago, the eminent French philosopher, who wrote +one of the earliest and most interesting biographies of +Watt, relates anecdotes of him which, if correct, illustrate +well his thoughtfulness and his intelligence, as well as the +mechanical bent of the boy’s mind. He is said, at the age +of six years, to have occupied himself during leisure hours +with the solution of geometrical problems; and Arago discovers, +in a story in which he is described as experimenting +with the tea-kettle,<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> +his earliest investigations of the nature +and properties of steam.</p> + +<p>When finally sent to the village school, his ill health +prevented his making rapid progress; and it was only +when thirteen or fourteen years of age that he began to +show that he was capable of taking the lead in his class, and +to exhibit his ability in the study, particularly, of mathematics. +His spare time was principally spent in sketching +with his pencil, in carving, and in working at the bench, +both in wood and metal. He made many ingenious pieces +of mechanism, and some beautiful models. His favorite +work seemed to be the repairing of nautical instruments. +Among other pieces of apparatus made by the boy was +a very fine barrel-organ. In boyhood, as in after-life, he +was a diligent reader, and seemed to find something to interest +him in every book that came into his hands.</p> + +<p>At the age of eighteen, Watt was sent to Glasgow, there +to reside with his mother’s relatives, and to learn the trade +of a mathematical-instrument maker. The mechanic with +whom he was placed was soon found too indolent, or was +otherwise incapable of giving much aid in the project, and +Dr. Dick, of the University of Glasgow, with whom Watt +became acquainted, advised him to go to London. Accordingly,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[82]</a></span> +he set out in June, 1755, for the metropolis, where, on +his arrival, he arranged with Mr. John Morgan, in Cornhill, +to work a year at his chosen business, receiving as compensation +20 guineas. At the end of the year he was compelled, +by serious ill-health, to return home.</p> + +<p>Having become restored to health, he went again to +Glasgow in 1756, with the intention of pursuing his calling +there. But, not being the son of a burgess, and not having +served his apprenticeship in the town, he was forbidden by +the guilds, or trades-unions, to open a shop in Glasgow. +Dr. Dick came to his aid, and employed him to repair some +apparatus which had been bequeathed to the college. He +was finally allowed the use of three rooms in the University +building, its authorities not being under the municipal rule. +He remained here until 1760, when, the trades no longer +objecting, he took a shop in the city; and in 1761 moved +again, into a shop on the north side of the Trongate, where +he earned a scanty living without molestation, and still +kept up his connection with the college. He did some work +as a civil engineer in the neighborhood of Glasgow, but +soon gave up all other employment, and devoted himself +entirely to mechanics.</p> + +<p>He spent much of his leisure time—of which he had, at +first, more than was desirable—in making philosophical experiments +and in the manufacture of musical instruments, +in making himself familiar with the sciences, and in devising +improvements in the construction of organs. In order +to pursue his researches more satisfactorily, he studied German +and Italian, and read Smith’s “Harmonics,” that he +might become familiar with the principles of construction of +musical instruments. His reading was still very desultory; +but the introduction of the Newcomen engine in the neighborhood +of Glasgow, and the presence of a model in the +college collections, which was placed in his hands, in 1763, +for repair, led him to study the history of the steam-engine, +and to conduct for himself an experimental research<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[83]</a></span> +into the properties of steam, with a set of improvised apparatus.</p> + +<p>Dr. Robison, then a student of the University, who +found Watt’s shop a pleasant place in which to spend his +leisure, and whose tastes affiliated so strongly with those of +Watt that they became friends immediately upon making +acquaintance, called the attention of the instrument-maker +to the steam-engine as early as 1759, and suggested that it +might be applied to the propulsion of carriages. Watt was +at once interested, and went to work on a little model, having +tin steam-cylinders and pistons connected to the driving-wheels +by an intermediate system of gearing. The scheme +was afterwards given up, and was not revived by Watt for a +quarter of a century.</p> + +<p>Watt studied chemistry, and was assisted by the advice +and instruction of Dr. Black, who was then making the researches +which resulted in the discovery of “latent heat.” +His proposal to repair the model Newcomen engine in the +college collections led to his study of Desaguliers’s treatise, +and of the works of Switzer and others. He thus learned +what had been done by Savery and by Newcomen, and +by those who had improved the engine of the latter.</p> + +<p>In his own experiments he used, at first, apothecaries’ +phials and hollow canes for steam reservoirs and pipes, and +later a Papin’s digester and a common syringe. The latter +combination made a non-condensing engine, in which he +used steam at a pressure of 15 pounds per square inch. +The valve was worked by hand, and Watt saw that an +automatic valve-gear only was needed to make a working +machine. This experiment, however, led to no practical result. +He finally took hold of the Newcomen model, which +had been obtained from London, where it had been sent +for repairs, and, putting it in good working order, commenced +experiments with that.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig24" id="Fig24"></a> +<img src="images/illo111.png" alt="Newcomen Model" width="252" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 24.</span>—The Newcomen Model.</p></div> + +<p>The Newcomen model, as it happened, had a boiler +which, although made to a scale from engines in actual use,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[84]</a></span> +was quite incapable of furnishing steam enough to work the +engine. It was about nine inches in diameter; the steam-cylinder +was two inches in diameter, and of six inches stroke +of piston, arranged as in <a href="#Fig24">Fig. 24</a>, which is a picture of the +model as it now appears. It is retained among the most +carefully-preserved treasures of the University of Glasgow.</p> + +<p>Watt made a new boiler for the experimental investigation +on which he was about to enter, and arranged it in such +a manner that he could measure the quantity of water evaporated +and of steam used at every stroke of the engine.</p> + +<p>He soon discovered that it required but a very small +quantity of steam to heat a very large quantity of water, +and immediately attempted to determine with precision the +relative weights of steam and water in the steam-cylinder +when condensation took place at the down-stroke of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[85]</a></span> +engine, and thus independently proved the existence of that +“latent heat,” the discovery of which constitutes, also, one +of the greatest of Dr. Black’s claims to distinction. Watt +at once went to Dr. Black and related the remarkable fact +which he had thus detected, and was, in turn, taught by +Black the character of the phenomenon as it had been explained +to his classes by the latter some little time previously. +Watt found that, at the boiling-point, his steam, condensing, +was capable of heating six times its weight of +water such as was used for producing condensation.</p> + +<p>Perceiving that steam, weight for weight even, was a +vastly greater absorbent and reservoir of heat than water, +Watt saw plainly the importance of taking greater care to +economize it than had previously been customary. He first +attempted to economize in the boiler, and made boilers with +wooden “shells,” in order to prevent losses by conduction +and radiation, and used a larger number of flues to secure +more complete absorption of the heat from the furnace-gases. +He also covered his steam-pipes with non-conducting +materials, and took every precaution that his ingenuity +could devise to secure complete utilization of the heat of +combustion. He soon found, however, that he was not +working at the most important point, and that the great +source of loss was to be found in defects which he noted in +the action of the steam in the cylinder. He soon concluded +that the sources of loss of heat in the Newcomen engine—which +would be greatly exaggerated in a small model—were:</p> + +<p>First, the dissipation of heat by the cylinder itself, +which was of brass, and was both a good conductor and a +good radiator.</p> + +<p>Secondly, the loss of heat consequent upon the necessity +of cooling down the cylinder at every stroke, in producing +the vacuum.</p> + +<p>Thirdly, the loss of power due to the pressure of vapor +beneath the piston, which was a consequence of the imperfect +method of condensation.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[86]</a></span></p> + +<p>He first made a cylinder of non-conducting material—wood +soaked in oil and then baked—and obtained a decided +advantage in economy of steam. He then conducted +a series of very accurate experiments upon the temperature +and pressure of steam at such points on the scale as he could +readily reach, and, constructing a curve with his results, +the abscesses representing temperatures and the pressures +being represented by the ordinates, he ran the curve backward +until he had obtained closely-approximate measures of +temperatures less than 212°, and pressures less than atmospheric. +He thus found that, with the amount of injection-water +used in the Newcomen engine, bringing the temperature +of the interior, as he found, down to from 140° to 175° +Fahr., a very considerable back-pressure would be met with.</p> + +<p>Continuing his examination still further, he measured +the amount of steam used at each stroke, and, comparing it +with the quantity that would just fill the cylinder, he found +that at least <i>three-fourths was wasted</i>. The quantity of +cold water necessary to produce the condensation of a given +weight of steam was next determined; and he found that +one pound of steam contained enough heat to raise about +six pounds of cold water, as used for condensation, from the +temperature of 52° to the boiling-point; and, going still +further, he found that he was compelled to use, at each +stroke of the Newcomen engine, <i>four times as much injection-water +as should suffice to condense a cylinder full of +steam</i>. This confirmed his previous conclusion that three-fourths +of the heat supplied to the engine was wasted.</p> + +<p>Watt had now, therefore, determined by his own researches, +as he himself enumerates them,<a name="FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_36" class="fnanchor">[36]</a> the following +facts:</p> + +<p>“1. The capacities for heat of iron, copper, and of +some sorts of wood, as compared with water.</p> + +<p>“2. The bulk of steam compared with that of water.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[87]</a></span>“3. The quantity of water evaporated in a certain +boiler by a pound of coal.</p> + +<p>“4. The elasticities of steam at various temperatures +greater than that of boiling water, and an approximation to +the law which it follows at other temperatures.</p> + +<p>“5. How much water in the form of steam was required +every stroke by a small Newcomen engine, with a +wooden cylinder 6 inches in diameter and 12 inches stroke.</p> + +<p>“6. The quantity of cold water required in every stroke +to condense the steam in that cylinder, so as to give it a +working-power of about 7 pounds on the square inch.”</p> + +<p>After these well-devised and truly scientific investigations, +Watt was enabled to enter upon his work of improving +the steam-engine with an intelligent understanding of +its existing defects, and with a knowledge of their cause. +Watt soon saw that, in order to reduce the losses in the +working of the steam in the steam-cylinder, it would be +necessary to find some means, as he said, to keep the cylinder +“always as hot as the steam that entered it,” notwithstanding +the great fluctuations of temperature and pressure +of the steam during the up and the down strokes. He has +told us how, finally, the happy thought occurred to him +which relieved him of all difficulty, and led to the series of +modifications which at last gave to the world the modern +type of steam-engine.</p> + +<p>He says:<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id="FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> +“I had gone to take a walk on a fine Sabbath +afternoon. I had entered the Green by the gate at +the foot of Charlotte street, and had passed the old washing-house. +I was thinking upon the engine at the time, +and had gone as far as the herd’s house, when the idea came +into my mind that, as steam was an elastic body, it would +rush into a vacuum, and, if a communication were made between +the cylinder and an exhausted vessel, it would rush +into it, and might be there condensed without cooling the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[88]</a></span> +cylinder. I then saw that I must get rid of the condensed +steam and injection-water if I used a jet, as in Newcomen’s +engine. Two ways of doing this occurred to me: First, +the water might be run off by a descending pipe, if an offlet +could be got at the depth of 35 or 36 feet, and any air +might be extracted by a small pump. The second was, to +make the pump large enough to extract both water and air.” +“I had not walked farther than the Golf-house, when the +whole thing was arranged in my mind.”</p> + +<p>Referring to this invention, Watt said to Prof. Jardine:<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id="FNanchor_38_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_38" +class="fnanchor">[38]</a> +“When analyzed, the invention would not appear so great +as it seemed to be. In the state in which I found the +steam-engine, it was no great effort of mind to observe that +the quantity of fuel necessary to make it work would +forever prevent its extensive utility. The next step in +my progress was equally easy—to inquire what was the +cause of the great consumption of fuel. This, too, was +readily suggested, viz., the waste of fuel which was necessary +to bring the whole cylinder, piston, and adjacent parts +from the coldness of water to the heat of steam, no fewer +than from 15 to 20 times in a minute.” It was by pursuing +this train of thought that he was led to devise the separate +condenser.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig25" id="Fig25"></a> +<img src="images/illo116.png" alt="Watt's Experiment" width="311" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 25.</span>—Watt’s Experiment.</p></div> + +<p>On Monday morning Watt proceeded to make an experimental +test of his new invention, using for his steam-cylinder +and piston a large brass surgeon’s-syringe, 1<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span>-inch +diameter and 10 inches long. At each end was a pipe leading +steam from the boiler, and fitted with a cock to act as +a steam-valve. A pipe led also from the top of the cylinder +to the condenser, the syringe being inverted and the +piston-rod hanging downward for convenience. The condenser +was made of two pipes of thin tin plate, 10 or 12 +inches long, and about one-sixth of an inch in diameter, +standing vertically, and having a connection at the top<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[89]</a></span> +with a horizontal pipe of larger size, and fitted with a +“snifting-valve.” Another vertical pipe, about an inch in +diameter, was connected to the condenser, and was fitted +with a piston, with a view to using it as an “air-pump.” +The whole was set in a cistern of cold water. The piston-rod +of the little steam-cylinder was drilled from end to end +to permit the water to be removed from the cylinder. This +little model (<a href="#Fig25">Fig. 25</a>) worked very satisfactorily, and the +perfection of the vacuum was such that the machine lifted +a weight of 18 pounds hung upon the piston-rod, as in the +sketch. A larger model was immediately afterward constructed, +and the result of its test confirmed fully the anticipations +which had been awakened by the first experiment.</p> + +<p>Having taken this first step and made such a radical +improvement, the success of this invention was no sooner +determined than others followed in rapid succession, as consequences +of the exigencies arising from the first change in +the old Newcomen engine. But in the working out of the +forms and proportions of the details of the new engine, +even Watt’s powerful mind, stored as it was with happily-combined +scientific and practical information, was occupied<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[90]</a></span> +for years. In attaching the separate condenser, he first +attempted surface-condensation; but this not succeeding +well, he substituted the jet. Some provision became at +once necessary for preventing the filling of the condenser +with water.</p> + +<p>Watt at first intended adopting the expedient which had +worked satisfactorily with the less effective condensation of +Newcomen’s engine—i. e., leading a pipe from the condenser +to a depth greater than the height of a column of water +which could be counterbalanced by the pressure of the +atmosphere; but he subsequently employed the air-pump, +which relieves the condenser not only of the water, but of +the air which also usually collects in considerable volume in +the condenser, and vitiates the vacuum. He next substituted +oil and tallow for water in the lubrication of the piston and +keeping it steam-tight, in order to avoid the cooling of the +cylinder incident to the use of the latter. Another cause +of refrigeration of the cylinder, and consequent waste of +power in its operation, was seen to be the entrance of the +atmosphere, which followed the piston down the cylinder at +each stroke, cooling its interior by its contact. This the +inventor concluded to prevent by covering the top of the +cylinder, allowing the piston-rod to play through a “stuffing-box”—which +device had long been known to mechanics.</p> + +<p>He accordingly not only covered the top, but surrounded +the whole cylinder with an external casing, or +“steam-jacket,” and allowed the steam from the boiler to +pass around the steam-cylinder and to press upon the upper +surface of the piston, where its pressure was variable at +pleasure, and therefore more manageable than that of the +atmosphere. It also, besides keeping the cylinder hot, +could do comparatively little harm should it leak by the +piston, as it could be condensed, and thus readily disposed of.</p> + +<p>When he had concluded to build the larger experimental +engine, Watt determined to give his whole time and attention +to the work, and hired a room in an old deserted<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[91]</a></span> +pottery near the Broomielaw. Here he worked with a +mechanic—John Gardiner, whom he had taken into his employ—uninterruptedly +for many weeks. Meantime, through +his friend Dr. Black, probably, he had made the acquaintance +of Dr. Roebuck, a wealthy physician, who had, with +other Scotch capitalists, just founded the celebrated Carron +Iron-Works, and had opened a correspondence with him, in +which he kept that gentleman informed of the progress of +his work on the new engine.</p> + +<p>This engine had a steam-cylinder, Watt tells us, of “five +or six” inches diameter, and of two feet stroke. It was of +copper, smooth-hammered, but not bored out, and “not +very true.” This was encased in another cylinder of wood. +In August, 1765, he tried the small engine, and wrote Dr. +Roebuck that he had had “good success,” although the +machine was very imperfect. “On turning the exhausting-cock, +the piston, when not loaded, ascended as quick as +the blow of a hammer, and as quick when loaded with 18 +pounds (being 7 pounds on the inch) as it would have done +if it had had an injection as usual.” He then tells his +correspondent that he was about to make the larger model. +In October, 1765, he finished the latter. The engine, when +ready for trial, was still very imperfect. It nevertheless did +good work for so rude a machine.</p> + +<p>Watt was now reduced to poverty, and, after borrowing +considerable sums from friends, he was finally compelled to +give up his scheme for the time, and to seek employment in +order to provide for his family. During an interval of about +two years he supported himself by surveying, and by the +work of exploring coal-fields in the neighborhood of Glasgow +for the magistrates of the city. He did not, however, +entirely give up his invention.</p> + +<p>In 1767, Dr. Roebuck assumed Watt’s liabilities to the +amount of £1,000, and agreed to provide capital for the prosecution +of his experiments and to introduce his invention; +and, on the other hand, Watt agreed to surrender to Dr.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[92]</a></span> +Roebuck two-thirds of the patent. Another engine was +next built, having a steam-cylinder seven or eight inches +in diameter, which was finished in 1768. This worked sufficiently +well to induce the partners to ask for a patent, and +the specifications and drawings were completed and presented +in 1769.</p> + +<p>Watt also built and set up several Newcomen engines, +partly, perhaps, to make himself thus thoroughly familiar +with the practical details of engine-building. Meantime, +also, he prepared the plans for, and finally had built, a moderately +large engine of his own new type. Its steam-cylinder +was 18 inches in diameter, and the stroke of piston was +5 feet. This engine was built at Kinneil, and was finished +in September, 1769. It was not all satisfactory in either +its construction or its operation. The condenser was a +surface-condenser composed of pipes somewhat like that +used in his first little model, and did not prove to be satisfactorily +tight. The steam-piston leaked seriously, and repeated +trials only served to make more evident its imperfections. +He was assisted in this time of need by both Dr. Black and +Dr. Roebuck; but he felt strongly the risks which he ran +of involving his friends in serious losses, and became very +despondent. Writing to Dr. Black, he says: “Of all +things in life, there is nothing more foolish than inventing;” +and probably the majority of inventors have been led to the +same opinion by their own experiences.</p> + +<p>“Misfortunes never come singly;” and Watt was borne +down by the greatest of all misfortunes—the loss of a faithful +and affectionate wife—while still unable to see a successful +issue of his schemes. Only less disheartening than +this was the loss of fortune of his steadfast friend, Dr. Roebuck, +and the consequent loss of his aid. It was at about +this time, in the year 1769, that negotiations were commenced +which resulted in the transfer of the capitalized interest +in Watt’s engine to the wealthy manufacturer whose +name, coupled with that of Watt, afterward became known<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[93]</a></span> +throughout the civilized world, as the steam-engine in its +new form was pushed into use by his energy and business +tact.</p> + +<p>Watt met Mr. Boulton, who next became his partner, in +1768, on his journey to London to procure his patent, and +the latter had then examined Watt’s designs, and, at once +perceiving their value, proposed to purchase an interest. +Watt was then unable to reply definitely to Boulton’s proposition, +pending his business arrangements with Dr. Roebuck; +but, with Roebuck’s consent, afterwards proposed +that Boulton should take a one-third interest with himself +and partner, paying Roebuck therefor one-half of all expenses +previously incurred, and whatever he should choose +to add to compensate “for the risk he had run.” Subsequently, +Dr. Roebuck proposed to transfer to Boulton and +to Dr. Small, who was desirous of taking interest with +Boulton, one-half of his proprietorship in Watt’s inventions, +on receiving “a sum not less than one thousand pounds,” +which should, after the experiments on the engine were +completed, be deemed “just and reasonable.” Twelve +months were allowed for the adjustment of the account. +This proposal was accepted in November, 1769.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port5" id="Port5"></a> +<img src="images/illo121.png" alt="Matthew Boulton" width="350" height="428" /> +<p class="caption">Matthew Boulton.</p></div> + +<p><span class="smcap"><a href="#Port5">Matthew Boulton</a></span>, who now became a partner with +James Watt, was the son of a Birmingham silver stamper +and piecer, and succeeded to his father’s business, building +up a great establishment, which, as well as its proprietor, +was well known in Watt’s time. Watt, writing to Dr. +Roebuck before the final arrangement had been made, +urged him to close with Boulton for “the following considerations:</p> + +<p>“1st. From Mr. Boulton’s own character as an ingenious, +honest, and rich man. 2dly. From the difficulty and +expense there would be of procuring accurate and honest +workmen and providing them with proper utensils, and +getting a proper overseer or overseers. If, to avoid this +inconvenience, you were to contract for the work to be done<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[94]</a></span> +by a master-workman, you must give up a great share of +the profit. 3dly. The success of the engine is far from +being verified. If Mr. Boulton takes his chance of success +from the account I shall write Dr. Small, and pays you +any adequate share of the money laid out, it lessens your risk, +and in a greater proportion than I think it will lessen your +profits. 4thly. The assistance of Mr. Boulton’s and Dr. +Small’s ingenuity (if the latter engage in it) in improving +and perfecting the machine may be very considerable, and +may enable us to get the better of the difficulties that might +otherwise damn it. Lastly, consider my uncertain health, +my irresolute and inactive disposition, my inability to bargain +and struggle for my own with mankind: all which +disqualify me for any great undertaking. On our side, +consider the first outlay and interest, the patent, the present +engine, about £200 (though there would not be much loss<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[95]</a></span> +in making it into a common engine), two years of my time, +and the expense of models.”</p> + +<p>Watt’s estimate of the value of Boulton’s ingenuity and +talent was well-founded. Boulton had shown himself a good +scholar, and had acquired considerable knowledge of the +languages and of the sciences, particularly of mathematics, +after leaving the school from which he graduated into the +shop when still a boy. In the shop he soon introduced +a number of valuable improvements, and he was always +on the lookout for improvements made by others, with a +view to their introduction in his business. He was a man +of the modern style, and never permitted competitors to +excel him in any respect, without the strongest efforts to +retain his leading position. He always aimed to earn a +reputation for good work, as well as to make money. His +father’s workshop was at Birmingham; but Boulton, after a +time, found that his rapidly-increasing business would compel +him to find room for the erection of a more extensive +establishment, and he secured land at Soho, two miles distant +from Birmingham, and there erected his new manufactory, +about 1762.</p> + +<p>The business was, at first, the manufacture of ornamental +metal-ware, such as metal buttons, buckles, watch-chains, +and light filigree and inlaid work. The manufacture of +gold and silver plated-ware was soon added, and this branch +of business gradually developed into a very extensive manufacture +of works of art. Boulton copied fine work wherever +he could find it, and often borrowed vases, statuettes, +and bronzes of all kinds from the nobility of England, and +even from the queen, from which to make copies. The +manufacture of inexpensive clocks, such as are now well +known throughout the world as an article of American trade, +was begun by Boulton. He made some fine astronomical +and valuable ornamental clocks, which were better appreciated +on the Continent than in England. The business of +the Soho manufactory in a few years became so extensive,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[96]</a></span> +that its goods were known to every civilized nation, and its +growth, under the management of the enterprising, conscientious, +and ingenious Boulton, more than kept pace with +the accumulation of capital; and the proprietor found himself, +by his very prosperity, often driven to the most careful +manipulation of his assets, and to making free use of +his credit.</p> + +<p>Boulton had a remarkable talent for making valuable +acquaintances, and for making the most of advantages accruing +thereby. In 1758 he made the acquaintance of +Benjamin Franklin, who then visited Soho; and in 1766 +these distinguished men, who were then unaware of the +existence of James Watt, were corresponding, and, in their +letters, discussing the applicability of steam-power to various +useful purposes. Between the two a new steam-engine was +designed, and a model was constructed by Boulton, which +was sent to Franklin and exhibited by him in London.</p> + +<p>Dr. Darwin seems to have had something to do with +this scheme, and the enthusiasm awakened by the promise +of success given by this model may have been the origin of +the now celebrated prophetic rhymes so often quoted from +the works of that eccentric physician and poet. Franklin +contributed, as his share in the plan, an idea of so arranging +the grate as to prevent the production of smoke. He says: +“All that is necessary is to make the smoke of fresh coals +pass descending through those that are already ignited.” +His idea has been, by more recent schemers, repeatedly +brought forward as new. Nothing resulted from these experiments +of Boulton, Franklin, and Darwin, and the plan +of Watt soon superseded all less well-developed plans.</p> + +<p>In 1767, Watt visited Soho and carefully inspected +Boulton’s establishment. He was very favorably impressed +by the admirable arrangement of the workshops and the +completeness of their outfit, as well as by the perfection of +the organization and administration of the business. In +the following year he again visited Soho, and this time met<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[97]</a></span> +Boulton, who had been absent at the previous visit. The +two great mechanics were mutually gratified by the meeting, +and each at once acquired for the other the greatest +respect and esteem. They discussed Watt’s plans, and +Boulton then definitely decided not to continue his own +experiments, although he had actually commenced the construction +of a pumping-engine. With Dr. Small, who was +also at Soho, Watt discussed the possibility of applying his +engine to the propulsion of carriages, and to other purposes. +On his return home, Watt continued his desultory labors +on his engines, as already described; and the final completion +of the arrangement with Boulton, which immediately +followed the failure of Dr. Roebuck, took place some time +later.</p> + +<p>Before Watt could leave Scotland to join his partner at +Soho, it was necessary that he should finish the work which +he had in hand, including the surveys of the Caledonian +canal, and other smaller works, which he had had in progress +some months. He reached Birmingham in the spring of +1774, and was at once domiciled at Soho, where he set at +work upon the partly-made engines which had been sent +from Scotland some time previously. They had laid, unused +and exposed to the weather, at Kinneil three years, and +were not in as good order as might have been desired. The +<i>block-tin</i> steam-cylinder was probably in good condition, +but the iron parts were, as Watt said, “perishing,” while +he had been engaged in his civil engineering work. At +leisure moments, during this period, Watt had not entirely +neglected his plans for the utilization of steam. He had +given much thought, and had expended some time, in experiments +upon the plan of using it in a rotary or “wheel” +engine. He did not succeed in contriving any plan which +seemed to promise success.</p> + +<p>It was in November, 1774, that Watt finally announced +to his old partner, Dr. Roebuck, the successful trial of the +Kinneil engine. He did not write with the usual enthusiasm<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[98]</a></span> +and extravagance of the inventor, for his frequent disappointments +and prolonged suspense had very thoroughly +extinguished his vivacity. He simply wrote: “The fire-engine +I have invented is now going, and answers much +better than any other that has yet been made; and I expect +that the invention will be very beneficial to me.”</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig26" id="Fig26"></a> +<img src="images/illo125.png" alt="Watt's Engine" width="350" height="531" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 26.</span>—Watt’s Engine, 1774.</p></div> + +<p>The change of the “atmospheric engine” of Newcomen +into the modern steam-engine was now completed in its +essential details. The first engine which was erected at +Kinneil, near Boroughstoness, had a steam-cylinder 18 +inches in diameter. It is seen in the accompanying sketch.</p> + +<p>In <a href="#Fig26">Fig. 26</a>, the steam passes from the boiler through the +pipe <i>d</i> and the valve <i>c</i> to the cylinder-casing or steam-jacket, +<i>Y Y</i>, and above the piston, <i>b</i>, which it follows in its<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[99]</a></span> +descent in the cylinder, <i>a</i>, the valve <i>f</i> being at this time +open, to allow the exhaust into the condenser, <i>h</i>.</p> + +<p>The piston now being at the lower end of the cylinder, +and the pump-rods at the opposite end of the beam, <i>y</i>, being +thus raised and the pumps filled with water, the valves <i>c</i> +and <i>f</i> close, while <i>e</i> opens, allowing the steam which remains +above the piston to flow beneath it, until, the pressures +becoming equal above and below, the weight of the pump-rods +overbalancing that of the piston, the latter is rapidly +drawn to the top of the cylinder, while the steam is displaced +above, passing to the under-side of the piston.</p> + +<p>The valve <i>e</i> is next closed, and <i>c</i> and <i>f</i> are again opened; +the down-stroke is repeated. The water and air entering +the condenser are removed at each stroke by the air-pump, +<i>i</i>, which communicates with the condenser by the passage <i>s</i>. +The pump <i>q</i> supplies condensing-water, and the pump <i>A</i> +takes away a part of the water of condensation, which is +thrown by the air-pump into the “hot-well,” <i>k</i>, and from +it the feed-pump supplies the boiler. The valves are +moved by valve-gear very similar to Beighton’s and Smeaton’s, +by the pins, <i>m m</i>, in the “plug-frame” or “tappet-rod,” +<i>n n</i>.</p> + +<p>The engine is mounted upon a substantial foundation, +<i>B B</i>. <i>F</i> is an opening out of which, before starting the +engine, the air is driven from the cylinder and condenser.</p> + +<p>The inventions covered by the patent of 1769 were described +as follows:</p> + +<p>“My method of lessening the consumption of steam, +and consequently fuel, in fire-engines, consists in the following +principles:</p> + +<p>“1st. That the vessel in which the powers of steam are +to be employed to work the engine—which is called ‘the +cylinder’ in common fire-engines, and which I call ‘the +steam-vessel’—must, during the whole time that the engine +is at work, be kept as hot as the steam which enters it; first, +by inclosing it in a case of wood, or any other materials that<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[100]</a></span> +transmit heat slowly; secondly, by surrounding it with +steam or other heated bodies; and thirdly, by suffering +neither water nor other substances colder than the steam to +enter or touch it during that time.</p> + +<p>“2dly. In engines that are to be worked, wholly or partially, +by condensation of steam, the steam is to be condensed +in vessels distinct from the steam-vessel or cylinder, +though occasionally communicating with them. These vessels +I call condensers; and while the engines are working, +these <i>condensers</i> ought at least to be kept as cold as the air +in the neighborhood of the engines, by application of water +or other cold bodies.</p> + +<p>“3dly. Whatever air or other elastic vapor is not condensed +by the cold of the condenser, and may impede the +working of the engine, is to be drawn out of the steam-vessels +or condensers by means of pumps, wrought by the engines +themselves, or otherwise.</p> + +<p>“4thly. I intend in many cases to employ the expansive +force of steam to press on the pistons, or whatever may be +used instead of them, in the same manner as the pressure +of the atmosphere is now employed in common fire-engines. +In cases where cold water cannot be had in plenty, the +engines may be wrought by this force of steam only, by +discharging the steam into the open air after it has done its +office.</p> + +<p>“5thly. Where motions round an axis are required, I +make the steam-vessels in form of hollow rings or circular +channels, with proper inlets and outlets for the steam, +mounted on horizontal axles like the wheels of a water-mill. +Within them are placed a number of valves that suffer any +body to go round the channel in one direction only. In +these steam-vessels are placed weights, so fitted to them as +to fill up a part or portion of their channels, yet rendered +capable of moving freely in them by the means hereinafter +mentioned or specified. When the steam is admitted in +these engines between these weights and the valves, it acts<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[101]</a></span> +equally on both, so as to raise the weight on one side of the +wheel, and, by the reaction of the valves successively, to +give a circular motion to the wheel, the valves opening in +the direction in which the weights are pressed, but not in +the contrary. As the vessel moves round, it is supplied +with steam from the boiler, and that which has performed +its office may either be discharged by means of condensers, +or into the open air.</p> + +<p>“6thly. I intend in some cases to apply a degree of +cold not capable of reducing the steam to water, but of contracting +it considerably, so that the engines shall be worked +by the alternate expansion and contraction of the steam.</p> + +<p>“Lastly, instead of using water to render the piston or +other parts of the engine air or steam-tight, I employ oils, +wax, resinous bodies, fat of animals, quicksilver, and other +metals, in their fluid state.”</p> + +<p>In the construction and erection of his engines, Watt +still had great difficulty in finding skillful workmen to make +the parts with accuracy, to fit them with care, and to erect +them properly when once finished. And the fact that both +Newcomen and Watt met with such serious trouble, indicates +that, even had the engine been designed earlier, it is +quite unlikely that the world would have seen the steam-engine +a success until this time, when mechanics were just +acquiring the skill requisite for its construction. But, on +the other hand, it is not at all improbable that, had the mechanics +of an earlier period been as skillful and as well-educated +in the manual niceties of their business, the steam-engine +might have been much earlier brought into use.</p> + +<p>In the time of the Marquis of Worcester it would have +probably been found impossible to obtain workmen to construct +the steam-engine of Watt, had it been then invented. +Indeed, Watt, upon one occasion, congratulated himself that +one of his steam-cylinders only lacked <i>three-eighths</i> of an +inch of being truly cylindrical.</p> + +<p>The history of the steam-engine is from this time a history<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[102]</a></span> +of the work of the firm of Boulton & Watt. Newcomen +engines continued to be built for years after Watt +went to Soho, and by many builders. A host of inventors +still worked on the most attractive of all mechanical combinations, +seeking to effect further improvements. Some +inventions were made by contemporaries of Watt, as will +be seen hereafter, which were important as being the germs +of later growths; but these were nearly all too far in advance +of the time, and nearly every successful and important +invention which marked the history of steam-power for +many years originated in the fertile brain of James Watt.</p> + +<p>The defects of the Newcomen engine were so serious, +that it was no sooner known that Boulton of Soho had +become interested in a new machine for raising water by +steam-power, than inquiries came to him from all sides, +from mine-owners who were on the point of being drowned +out, and from proprietors whose profits were absorbed by +the expense of pumping, and who were glad to pay the £5 +per horse-power per year finally settled upon as royalty. +The London municipal water-works authorities were also +ready to negotiate for pumping-engines for raising water to +supply the metropolis. The firm was therefore at once +driven to make preparations for a large business.</p> + +<p>The first and most important matter, however, was to +secure an extension of the patent, which was soon to expire. +If not renewed, the 15 years of study and toil, of poverty +and anxiety, through which Watt had toiled, would +prove profitless to the inventor, and the fruits of his genius +would have become the unearned property of others. Watt +saw, at one time, little hope of securing the necessary act of +Parliament, and was greatly tempted to accept a position +tendered him by the Russian Government, upon the solicitation +of his old friend, Dr. Robison, then a Professor of +Mathematics at the Naval School at Cronstadt. The salary +was £1,000—a princely income for a man in Watt’s circumstances, +and a peculiar temptation to the needy mechanic.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[103]</a></span>Watt, however, went to London, and, with the help of +his own and of Boulton’s influential friends, succeeded in +getting his bill through. His patent was extended 24 +years, and Boulton & Watt set about the work of introducing +their engines with the industry and enterprise which +characterized their every act.</p> + +<p>In the new firm, Boulton took charge of the general +business, and Watt superintended the design, construction, +and erection of their engines. Boulton’s business capacity, +with Watt’s wonderful mechanical ability—Boulton’s physical +health, and his vigor and courage, offsetting Watt’s +feeble health and depression of spirits—and, more than all, +Boulton’s pecuniary resources, both in his own purse and in +those of his friends, enabled the firm to conquer all difficulties, +whether in finance, in litigation, or in engineering.</p> + +<p>It was only after the successful erection and operation +of several engines that Boulton and Watt became legally +partners. The understood terms were explicitly stated by +Watt to include an assignment to Boulton of two-thirds +the patent-right; Boulton paying all expenses, advancing +stock in trade at an appraised valuation, on which it was to +draw interest; Watt making all drawings and designs, and +drawing one-third net profits.</p> + +<p>As soon as Watt was relieved of the uncertainties regarding +his business connections, he married a second wife, +who, as Arago says, by “her various talent, soundness of +judgment, and strength of character,” made a worthy companion +to the large-hearted and large-brained engineer. +Thenceforward his cares were only such as every business-man +expects to be compelled to sustain, and the next ten +years were the most prolific in inventions of any period in +Watt’s life.</p> + +<p>From 1775 to 1785 the partners acquired five patents, +covering a large number of valuable improvements upon +the steam-engine, and several independent inventions. The +first of these patents covered the now familiar and universally-used<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[104]</a></span> +copying-press for letters, and a machine for drying +cloth by passing it between copper rollers filled with +steam of sufficiently high temperature to rapidly evaporate +the moisture. This patent was issued February 14, 1780.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig27" id="Fig27"></a> +<img src="images/illo131.png" alt="Watt's Engine" width="400" height="488" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 27.</span>—Watt’s Engine, 1781.</p></div> + +<p>In the following year, October 25, 1781, Watt patented +five devices by which he obtained the rotary motion of the +engine-shaft without the use of a crank. One of these was +the arrangement shown in <a href="#Fig27">Fig. 27</a>, and known as the “sun-and-planet”<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[105]</a></span> +wheels. The crank-shaft carries a gear-wheel, +which is engaged by another securely fixed upon the end of +the connecting-rod. As the latter is compelled to revolve +about the axis of the shaft by a tie which confines the connecting-rod +end at a fixed distance from the shaft, the +shaft-gear is compelled to revolve, and the shaft with it. +Any desired velocity-ratio was secured by giving the two +gears the necessary relative diameters. A fly-wheel was +used to regulate the motion of the shaft.<a name="FNanchor_39_39" +id="FNanchor_39_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a> Boulton & Watt +used the sun-and-planet device on many engines, but finally +adopted the crank, when the expiration of the patent held +by Matthew Wasborough, and which had earlier date than +Watt’s patent of 1781, permitted them. Watt had proposed +the use of a crank, it is said, as early as 1771, but Wasborough +anticipated him in securing the patent. Watt had made +a model of an engine with a crank and fly-wheel, and he has +stated that one of his workmen, who had seen the model, +described it to Wasborough, thus enabling the latter to deprive +Watt of his own property. The proceeding excited +great indignation on the part of Watt; but no legal action +was taken by Boulton & Watt, as the overthrow of the +patent was thought likely to do them injury by permitting +its use by more active competitors and more ingenious men.</p> + +<p>The next patent issued to Watt was an exceedingly important +one, and of especial interest in a history of the +development of the economical application of steam. This +patent included:</p> + +<p>1. The expansion of steam, and six methods of applying +the principle and of equalizing the expansive power.</p> + +<p>2. The double-acting steam-engine, in which the steam +acts on each side of the piston alternately, the opposite side +being in communication with the condenser.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[106]</a></span>3. The double or coupled steam-engine—two engines +capable of working together, or independently, as may be +desired.</p> + +<p>4. The use of a rack on the piston-rod, working into a +sector on the end of the beam, thus securing a perfect rectilinear +motion of the rod.</p> + +<p>5. A rotary engine, or “steam-wheel.”</p> + +<p>The efficiency to be secured by the expansion of steam +had long been known to Watt, and he had conceived the +idea of economizing some of that power, the waste of which +was so plainly indicated by the violent rushing of the exhaust-steam +into the condenser, as early as 1769. This was +described in a letter to Dr. Small, of Birmingham, in May of +that year. When experimenting at Kinneil, he had tried +to determine the real value of the principle by trial on his +small engine.</p> + +<p>Boulton had also recognized the importance of this improved +method of working steam, and their earlier Soho +engines were, as Watt said, made with cylinders “double +the size wanted, and cut off the steam at half-stroke.” But, +though “this was a great saving of steam, so long as the +valves remained as at first,” the builders were so constantly +annoyed by alterations of the valves by proprietors and +their engineers, that they finally gave up that method of +working, hoping ultimately to be able to resume it when +workmen of greater intelligence and reliability could be +found. The patent was issued July 17, 1782.</p> + +<p>Watt specified a cut-off at one-quarter stroke as usually +best.</p> + +<p>Watt’s explanation of the method of economizing by +expansive working, as given to Dr. Small,<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> is worthy of reproduction. +He says: “I mentioned to you a method of +still doubling the effect of steam, and that tolerably easy, +by using the power of steam rushing into a vacuum, at<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[107]</a></span> +present lost. This would do a little more than double the +effect, but it would too much enlarge the vessels to use it +all. It is peculiarly applicable to wheel-engines, and may +supply the want of a condenser where force of steam is only +used; for, open one of the steam-valves and admit steam, +until one-fourth of the distance between it and the next +valve is filled with steam, shut the valve, and the steam +will continue to expand and to pass round the wheel with a +diminishing power, ending in one-fourth its first exertion. +The sum of this series you will find greater than one-half, +though only one-fourth steam was used. The power will +indeed be unequal, but this can be remedied by a fly, or in +several other ways.”</p> + +<p>It will be noticed that Watt suggests, above, the now +well-known non-condensing engine. He had already, as has +been seen, described it in his patent of 1769, as also the +rotary engine.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig28" id="Fig28"></a> +<img src="images/illo135.png" alt="Steam Expansion" width="233" height="400" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 28.</span>—Expansion of Steam.</p></div> + +<p>Watt illustrates and explains his idea very neatly, by +a sketch similar to that here given (<a href="#Fig28">Fig. 28</a>).</p> + +<p>Steam, entering the cylinder at <i>a</i>, is admitted until one-fourth +the stroke has been made, when the steam-valve is +closed, and the remainder of the stroke is performed without +further addition of steam. The variation of steam-pressure +is approximately inversely proportional to the variation +of its volume. Thus, at half-stroke, the pressure becomes +one-half that at which the steam was supplied to the +cylinder. At the end of the stroke it has fallen to one-fourth +the initial pressure. The pressure is always nearly +equal to the product of the initial pressure and volume +divided by the volume at the given instant. In symbols,</p> + +<table class="formula ind10" summary="Formula 107_1"> + +<tr> +<td rowspan="2"><i>P′ = </i></td> +<td class="padr1 padl1 bb"><i>PV</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="padr1 padl1"><i>V′</i></td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>It is true that the condensation of steam doing work +changes this law in a marked manner; but the condensation +and reëvaporation of steam, due to the transfer of heat to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[108]</a></span> +and from the metal of the cylinder, tends to compensate +the first variation by a reverse change of pressure with +change of volume.</p> + +<p>The sketch shows this progressive variation of pressure +as expansion proceeds. It is seen that the work done per +unit of volume of steam as taken from the boiler is much +greater than when working without expansion. The product +of the mean pressure by the volume of the cylinder is +less, but the quotient obtained by dividing this quantity by +the volume or weight of steam taken from the boiler, is +much greater with than without expansion. For the case +assumed and illustrated, the work done during expansion is +one and two-fifths times that done previous to cutting off +the steam, and the work done per pound of steam is 2.4 +times that done without expansion.</p> + +<p>Were there no losses to be met with and to be exaggerated +by the use of steam expansively, the gain would become<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[109]</a></span> +very great with moderate expansion, amounting to +twice the work done when “following” full stroke, when +the steam is cut off at one-seventh. The estimated gain is, +however, never realized. Losses by friction, by conduction +and radiation of heat, and by condensation and reëvaporation +in the cylinder—of which losses the latter are most +serious—after passing a point which is variable, and which +is determined by the special conditions in each case, augment +with greater rapidity than the gain by expansion.</p> + +<p>In actual practice, it is rarely found, except where special +precautions are taken to reduce these losses, that economy +follows expansion to a greater number of volumes than +about one-half the square root of the steam-pressure; i. e., +about twice for 15 or 20 pounds pressure, three times for +about 30 pounds, and four and five times for 60 or 65 and +for 100 to 125 pounds respectively. Watt very soon learned +this general principle; but neither he, nor even many modern +engineers, seem to have learned that too great expansion +often gives greatly-reduced economy.</p> + +<p>The inequality of pressure due to expansion, to which +he refers, was a source of much perplexity to Watt, as he +was for a long time convinced that he must find some +method of “equalizing” the consequent irregular effort of +the steam upon the piston. The several methods of “equalizing +the expansive power” which are referred to in the +patent were attempts to secure this result. By one method, +he shifted the centre as the beam vibrated, thus changing +the lengths of the arms of that great lever, to compensate +the change of moment consequent upon the change of pressure. +He finally concluded that a fly-wheel, as first proposed +by Fitzgerald, who advised its use on Papin’s engine, would +be the best device on engines driving a crank, and trusted +to the inertia of a balance-weight in his pumping-engines, +or to the weight of the pump-rods, and permitted the piston +to take its own speed so far as it was not thus controlled.</p> + +<p>The double-acting engine was a modification of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[110]</a></span> single-acting +engine, and was very soon determined upon after +the successful working of the latter had become assured.</p> + +<p>Watt had covered in the top of his single-acting engine, +to prevent cooling the interior of the cylinder by contact +with the comparatively cold atmosphere. When this had +been done, there was but a single step required to convert +the machine into the double-acting engine. This alteration, +by which the steam was permitted to act upon the upper +and the lower sides of the piston alternately, had been proposed +by Watt as early as 1767, and a drawing of the engine +was laid before a committee of the House of Commons +in 1774-’75. By this simple change Watt doubled the +power of his engine. Although invented much earlier, the +plan was not patented until he was, as he states, driven to +take out the patent by the “plagiarists and pirates” who +were always ready to profit by his ingenuity. This form +of engine is now almost universally used. The single-acting +pumping-engine remains in use in Cornwall, and in a few +other localities, and now and then an engine is built for +other purposes, in which steam acts only on one side of the +piston; but these are rare exceptions to the general rule.</p> + +<p>The subject of his next invention was not less interesting. +The double-cylinder or “compound” engine has now, +after the lapse of nearly a century, become an important +and usual type of engine. It is impossible to determine +precisely to whom to award the credit of its first conception. +Dr. Falk, in 1779, had proposed a double-acting engine, +in which there were two single-acting cylinders, acting +in opposite directions and alternately on opposite sides of a +wheel, with which a rack on the piston-rod of each geared.</p> + +<p>Watt claimed that Hornblower, the patentee of the +“compound engine,” was an infringer upon his patents; and, +holding the patent on the separate condenser, he was able +to prevent the engine of his competitor taking such form as +to be successfully introduced. The Hornblower engine was +soon given up.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[111]</a></span>Watt stated that this form of engine had been invented +by him as early as 1767, and that he had explained its peculiarities +to Smeaton and others several years before Hornblower +attempted to use it. He wrote to Boulton: “It is +no less than our double-cylinder engine, worked upon our +principle of expansion.” He never made use of the plan, +however; and the principal object sought, apparently, in +patenting this, as well as many other devices, was to secure +himself against competition.</p> + +<p>The rack and sector patented at this time was soon superseded +by the parallel-motion; and the last claim, the +“steam-wheel” or rotary engine, although one was built of +considerable size, was not introduced.</p> + +<p>After the patent of 1782 had been secured, Watt turned +his attention, when not too hard-pressed by business, to +other schemes, and to experimenting with still other modifications +and applications of his engine. He had, as early +as 1777, proposed to make a steam-hammer for Wilkinson’s +forge; but he was too closely engaged with more important +matters to take hold of the project with much earnestness +until late in the year 1782, when, after some preliminary +trials, he reported, December 13th: “We have tried our +little tilting-forge hammer at Soho with success. The following +are some of the particulars: Cylinder, 15 inches in +diameter; 4 feet stroke; strokes per minute, 20. The +hammer-head, 120 pounds weight, rises 8 inches, and strikes +240 blows per minute. The machine goes quite regularly, +and can be managed as easily as a water-mill. It requires +a very small quantity of steam—not above half the contents +of the cylinder per stroke. The power employed is not +more than one-fourth of what would be required to raise +the quantity of water which would enable a water-wheel to +work the same hammer with the same velocity.”</p> + +<p>He immediately set about making a much heavier +hammer, and on April 26, 1783, he wrote that he had +done “a thing never done before”—making his hammer<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[112]</a></span> +strike 300 blows a minute. This hammer weighed 7<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> hundredweight, +and had a drop of 2 feet. The steam-cylinder +had a diameter of 42 inches and 6 feet stroke of piston, and +was calculated to have sufficient power to drive four hammers +weighing 7 hundredweight each. The engine made +20 strokes per minute, the hammer giving 90 blows in the +same time.</p> + +<p>This new application of steam-power proving successful, +Watt next began to develop a series of minor inventions, +which were finally secured by his patent of April 27, 1784, +together with the steam tilt-hammer, and a steam-carriage, +or “locomotive engine.”</p> + +<p>The contrivance previously used for guiding the head of +the piston-rod—the sectors and chains, or rack—had never +given satisfaction. The rudeness of design of the contrivance +was only equalled by its insecurity. Watt therefore +contrived a number of methods of accomplishing the purpose, +the most beautiful and widely-known of which is the +“parallel-motion,” although it has now been generally superseded +by one of the other devices patented at the same +time—the cross-head and guides. As originally proposed, a +rod was attached to the head of the piston-rod, standing +vertically when the latter was at quarter-stroke. The upper +end of this rod was pivoted to the end of the beam, and the +lower end to the extremity of a horizontal rod having a +length equal to one-half the length of the beam. The other +end of the horizontal rod was coupled to the frame of the +engine. As the piston rose and fell, the upper and lower +ends of the vertical rod were swayed in opposite directions, +and to an equal extent, by the beam and the lower horizontal +rod, the middle point at which the piston-rod was attached +preserving its position in the vertical line. This +form was objectionable, as the whole effort of the engine +was transmitted through the parallel-motion rods. Another +form is shown in the sketch given of the double-acting engine +in <a href="#Fig31">Fig. 31</a>, which was free from this defect. The<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[113]</a></span> +head of the piston-rod, <i>g</i>, was guided by rods connecting it +with the frame at <i>c</i>, and forming a “parallelogram,” <i>g d e b</i>, +with the beam. Many varieties of “parallel-motion” have +been devised since Watt’s invention was attached to his +engines at Soho. They usually are more or less imperfect, +guiding the piston-rod in a line only approximately straight.</p> + +<p>The cross-head and guides are now generally used, very +much as described by Watt in this patent as his “second +principle.” This device will be seen in the engravings +given hereafter of more modern engines. The head of the +piston-rod is fitted into a transverse bar, or cross-head, +which carries properly-shaped pieces at its extremities, to +which are bolted “gibs,” so made as to fit upon guides secured +to the engine-frame. These guides are adjusted to +precise parallelism with the centre line of the cylinder. +The cross-head, sliding in or on these guides, moves in a +perfectly straight line, and, compelling the piston-rod to +move with it, the latter is even more perfectly guided than +by a parallel-motion. This arrangement, where properly +proportioned, is not necessarily subject to great friction, +and is much more easily adjusted and kept in line than the +parallel-motion when wear occurs or maladjustment takes +place.</p> + +<p>By the same patent, Watt secured the now common +“puppet-valve” with beveled seat, and the application of +the steam-engine to driving rolling-mills and hammers for +forges, and to “wheel-carriages for removing persons or +goods, or other matters, from place to place.” For the latter +purpose he proposes to use boilers “of wood, or of thin +metal, strongly secured by hoops or otherwise,” and containing +“internal fire-boxes.” He proposed to use a condenser +cooled by currents of air.</p> + +<p>It would require too much space to follow Watt in all +his schemes for the improvement and for the application of +the steam-engine. A few of the more important and more +ingenious only can be described. Many of the contracts of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[114]</a></span> +Boulton & Watt gave them, as compensation for their engines, +a fraction—usually one-third—of the value of the +fuel saved by the use of the Watt engine in place of the +engine of Newcomen, the amount due being paid annually +or semiannually, with an option of redemption on the part +of the purchaser at ten years’ purchase. This form of +agreement compelled a careful determination, often, of the +work done and fuel consumed by both the engine taken out +and that put in its place. It was impossible to rely upon +any determination by personal observation of the number +of strokes made by the engine. Watt therefore made a +“counter,” like that now familiar to every one as used on +gas-meters. It consists of a train of wheels moving pointers +on several dials, the first dial showing tens, the second +hundreds, the third thousands, etc., strokes or revolutions. +Motion was communicated to the train by means of a pendulum, +the whole being mounted on the beam of the engine, +where every vibration produced a swing of the pendulum. +Eight dials were sometimes used, the counter being set and +locked, and only opened once a year, when the time arrived +for determining the work done during the preceding twelve-month.</p> + +<p>The application of his engine to purposes for which +careful adjustment of speed was requisite, or where the load +was subject to considerable variation, led to the use of a +controlling-valve in the steam-pipe, called the “throttle-valve,” +which was adjustable by hand, and permitted the +supply of steam to the engine to be adjusted at any instant +and altered to any desired extent. It is now given many +forms, but it still is most usually made just as originally +designed by Watt. It consists of a circular disk, which +just closes up the steam-pipe when set directly across it, or +of an elliptical disk, which closes the pipe when standing +at an angle of somewhat less than 90° with the line of +the pipe. This disk is carried on a spindle extending +through the pipe at one side, and carrying on its outer end<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[115]</a></span> +an arm by means of which it may be turned into any position. +When placed with its face in line with the pipe, it +offers very little resistance to the flow of steam to the engine. +When set in the other position, it shuts off steam +entirely and stops the engine. It is placed in such position +at any time, that the speed of the engine is just that required +at the time. In the engraving of the double-acting +engine with fly-wheel (<a href="#Fig31">Fig. 31</a>), it is shown at <i>T</i>, as controlled +by the governor.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig29" id="Fig29"></a> +<img src="images/illo142.png" alt="Fly-Ball Governor" width="282" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 29.</span>—The Governor.</p></div> + +<p>The <a href="#Fig29">governor</a>, or “fly-ball governor,” as it is often +distinctively called, was another of Watt’s minor but very +essential inventions. Two heavy iron or brass balls, <i>B B′</i>, +were suspended from pins, <i>C C′</i>, in a little cross-piece carried +on the head of a vertical spindle, <i>A A′</i>, driven by the +engine. The speed of the engine varying, that of the spindle +changed correspondingly, and the faster the balls were swung +the farther they separated. When the engine’s speed decreased, +the period of revolution of the balls was increased, +and they fell back toward the spindle. Whenever the velocity +of the engine was uniform, the balls preserved their distance +from the spindle and remained at the same height, their<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[116]</a></span> +altitude being determined by the relation existing between +the force of gravity and centrifugal force in the temporary +position of equilibrium. The distance from the point of suspension +down to the level of the balls is always equal to 9.78 +inches divided by the square of the number of revolutions +per second—i. e.,</p> + +<table class="ind10 formula" summary="Formula 116"> + +<tr> +<td rowspan="2"><i>h</i> = 9.78 </td> +<td class="padr1 padl1 bb">1</td> +<td rowspan="2"> = 0.248 </td> +<td class="padr1 padl1 bb">1</td> +<td rowspan="2">meters.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="padr1 padl1"><i>N<sup>2</sup></i></td> +<td class="padr1 padl1"><i>N<sup>2</sup></i></td> +</tr> + +</table> + + +<p>The arms carrying the balls, or the balls themselves, are +pinned to rods, <i>M M′</i>, which are connected to a piece, <i>N N′</i>, +sliding loosely on the spindle. A score, <i>T</i>, cut in this piece +engages a lever, <i>V</i>, and, as the balls rise and fall, a rod, <i>W</i>, +is moved, closing and opening the throttle-valve, and thus +adjusting the supply of steam in such a way as to preserve +a nearly fixed speed of engine. The connection with the +throttle-valve and with the cut-off valve-gear is seen not +only in the engraving of the double-acting Watt engine, but +also in those of the Greene and the Corliss engines. This +contrivance had previously been used in regulating water-wheels +and windmills. Watt’s invention consisted in its +application to the regulation of the steam-engine.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig30" id="Fig30"></a> +<img src="images/illo144.png" alt="Steam and Water Gauge" width="350" height="300" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 30.</span><br />Mercury Steam Gauge. Glass Water Gauge.</p></div> + +<p>Still another useful invention of Watt’s was his “mercury +steam-gauge”—a barometer in which the height of the +mercury was determined by the pressure of the steam instead +of that of the atmosphere. This simple instrument +consisted merely of a bent tube containing a portion of +mercury. One leg, <i>B D</i>, of this U-tube was connected with +the steam-pipe, or with the boiler by a small steam-pipe; the +other end, <i>C</i>, was open to the atmosphere. The pressure of +the steam on the mercury in <i>B D</i> caused it to rise in the +other “leg” to a height exactly proportioned to the pressure, +and causing very nearly two inches difference of level +to the pound, or one inch to the pound actual rise in the +outer leg. The rude sketch from Farey, here given (<a href="#Fig30">Fig. +30</a>), indicates sufficiently well the form of this gauge. It is +still considered by engineers the most reliable of all forms +of steam-gauge. Unfortunately, it is not conveniently applicable<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[117]</a></span> +at high pressure. The scale, <i>A</i>, is marked with +numbers indicating the pressure, which numbers are indicated +by the head of a rod floating up with the mercury.</p> + +<p>A similar gauge was used to determine the degree of +perfection of vacuum attained in the condenser, the mercury +falling in the outer leg as the vacuum became more +complete. A perfect vacuum would cause a depression of +level in that leg to 30 inches below the level of the mercury +in the leg connected with the condenser. In a more usual +form, it consisted of a simple glass tube having its lower +end immersed in a cistern of mercury, as in the ordinary +barometer, the top of the tube being connected with a pipe +leading to the condenser. With a perfect vacuum in the +condenser, the mercury would rise in the tube very nearly +30 inches. Ordinarily, the vacuum is not nearly perfect, +and, a back pressure remaining in the condenser of one or +two pounds per square inch, the atmospheric pressure remaining +unbalanced is only sufficient to raise the mercury +26 or 28 inches above the level of the liquid metal in the +cistern.</p> + +<p>To determine the height of water in his boiler, Watt +added to the gauge-cocks already long in use the “glass +water-gauge,” which is still seen in nearly every well-arranged<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[118]</a></span> +boiler. This was a glass tube, <i>a a′</i> (<a href="#Fig30">Fig. 30</a>), +mounted on a standard attached to the front of the boiler, +and at such a height that its middle point was very little +below the proposed water-level. It was connected by +a small pipe, <i>r</i>, at the top to the steam-space, and another +little pipe, <i>r′</i>, led into the boiler from its lower end +below the water-line. As the water rose and fell within +the boiler, its level changed correspondingly in the glass. +This little instrument is especially liked, because the position +of the water is at all times shown to the eye of the +attendant. If carefully protected against sudden changes +of temperature, it answers perfectly well with even very +high pressures.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig31" id="Fig31"></a> +<img src="images/illo146.png" alt="Boulton & Watt's Double Acting Engine" width="350" height="403" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 31.</span>—Boulton & Watt’s Double-Acting Engine, 1784.</p></div> + +<p>The engines built by Boulton & Watt were finally fitted +with the crank and fly-wheel for application to the driving +of mills and machinery. The accompanying engraving +(<a href="#Fig31">Fig. 31</a>) shows the engine as thus made, combining all of +the essential improvements designed by its inventor.</p> + +<p>In the engraving, <i>C</i> is the steam-cylinder, <i>P</i> the piston, +connected to the beam by the link, <i>g</i>, and guided by the +parallel-motion, <i>g d c</i>. At the opposite end of the beam a +connecting-rod, <i>O</i>, connects with the crank and fly-wheel +shaft. <i>R</i> is the rod of the air-pump, by means of which +the condenser is kept from being flooded by the water used +for condensation, which water-supply is regulated by an +“injection-handle,” <i>E</i>. A pump-rod, <i>N</i>, leads down from +the beam to the cold-water pump, by which water is raised +from the well or other source to supply the needed injection-water. +The air-pump rod also serves as a “plug-rod,” to +work the valves, the pins at <i>m</i> and <i>R</i> striking the lever, <i>m</i>, +at either end of the stroke. When the piston reaches the +top of the cylinder, the lever, <i>m</i>, is raised, opening the +steam-valve, <i>B</i>, at the top, and the exhaust-valve, <i>E</i>, at the +bottom, and at the same time closing the exhaust at the +top and the steam at the bottom. When the entrance of +steam at the top and the removal of steam-pressure below<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[119]</a></span> +the piston has driven the piston to the bottom, the pin, <i>R</i>, +strikes the lever, <i>m</i>, opening the steam and closing the +exhaust valve at the bottom, and similarly reversing the position +of the valves at the top. The position of the valves is +changed in this manner with every reversal of the motion +of the piston as the crank “turns over the centre.”</p> + +<p>The earliest engines of the double-acting kind, and of +any considerable size, which were built to turn a shaft, were +those which were set up in the Albion Mills, near Blackfriars’ +Bridge, London, in 1786, and destroyed when the +mills burned down in 1791. There were a pair of these +engines (shown in <a href="#Fig27">Fig. 27</a>), of 50 horse-power each, and +geared to drive 20 pairs of stones, making fine flour and +meal. Previous to the erection of this mill the power +in all such establishments had been derived from windmills +and water-wheels. This mill was erected by Boulton<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[120]</a></span> +& Watt, and capitalists working with them, not only +to secure the profit anticipated from locating a flour-mill +in the city of London, but also with a view to exhibiting +the capacity of the new double-acting “rotating” engine. +The plan was proposed in 1783, and work was commenced +in 1784; but the mill was not set in operation until +the spring of 1786. The capacity of the mill was, in ordinary +work, 16,000 bushels of wheat ground into fine flour +per week. On one occasion, the mill turned out 3,000 bushels +in 24 hours. In the construction of the machinery of +the mill, many improvements upon the then standard practice +were introduced, including cast-iron gearing with carefully-formed +teeth and iron framing. It was here that John +Rennie commenced his work, after passing through his apprenticeship +in Scotland, sending his chief assistant, Ewart, +to superintend the erection of the milling machinery. The +mill was a success as a piece of engineering, but a serious +loss was incurred by the capitalists engaged in the enterprise, +as it was set on fire a few years afterward and entirely +destroyed. Boulton and Watt were the principal +losers, the former losing £6,000, and the latter £3,000.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig32" id="Fig32"></a> +<img src="images/illo148.png" alt="Albion Mills Engine Valve Gear" width="294" height="500" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 32.</span>—Valve-Gear of the Albion Mills Engine.</p></div> + +<p>The valve-gear of this engine, a view of which is given +in <a href="#Fig27">Fig. 27</a>, was quite similar to that used on the Watt +pumping-engine. The accompanying illustration (<a href="#Fig32">Fig. 32</a>) +represents this valve-motion as attached to the Albion Mills +engine.</p> + +<p>The steam-pipe, <i>a b d d e</i>, leads the steam from the boiler +to the chambers, <i>b</i> and <i>e</i>. The exhaust-pipe, <i>g g</i>, leads +from <i>h</i> and <i>i</i> to the condenser. In the sketch, the upper +steam and the lower exhaust valves, <i>b</i> and <i>f</i>, are opened, +and the steam-valve, <i>e</i>, and exhaust-valve, <i>c</i>, are closed, the +piston being near the upper end of the cylinder and descending. +<i>l</i> represents the plug-frame, which carries tappets, +2 and 3, which engage the lever, <i>s</i>, at either end of its +throw, and turn the shaft, <i>u</i>, thus opening and closing <i>c</i> and +<i>e</i> simultaneously by means of the connecting-links, 13 and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[121]</a></span> +14. A similar pair of tappets on the opposite side of the +plug-rod move the valves, <i>b</i> and <i>f</i>, by means of the rods, 10 +and 11, the arm, <i>r</i>, when struck by those tappets, turning +the shaft, <i>t</i>, and thus moving the arms to which those rods +are attached. Counterbalance-weights, carried on the ends +of the arms, 4 and 15, retain the valves on their seats when +closed by the action of the tappets. When the piston +nearly reaches the lower end of the cylinder, the tappet, 1, +engages the arm, <i>r</i>, closing the steam-valve, <i>b</i>, and the next +instant shutting the exhaust-valve, <i>f</i>. At the same time, the +tappet, 3, by moving the arm, <i>s</i>, downward, opens the steam-valve, +<i>e</i>, and the exhaust-valve, <i>c</i>. Steam now no longer +issues from the steam-pipe into the space, <i>c</i>, and thence into +the engine-cylinder (not shown in the sketch); but it now +enters the engine through the valve, <i>e</i>, forcing the piston<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[122]</a></span> +upwards. The exhaust is simultaneously made to occur at +the upper end, the rejected steam passing from the engine +into the space, <i>c</i>, and thence through <i>c</i> and the pipe, <i>g</i>, into +the condenser.</p> + +<p>This kind of valve-gear was subsequently greatly improved +by Murdoch, Watt’s ingenious and efficient foreman, +but it is now entirely superseded on engines of this +class by the eccentric, and the various forms of valve-gear +driven by it.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig33" id="Fig33"></a> +<img src="images/illo149.png" alt="Watt's Half-Trunk Engine" width="350" height="531" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 33.</span>—Watt’s Half-Trunk Engine, 1784.</p></div> + +<p>The “trunk-engine” was still another of the almost innumerable +inventions of Watt. A half-trunk engine is +described in his patent of 1784, as shown in the accompanying +sketch (<a href="#Fig33">Fig. 33</a>), in which <i>A</i> is the cylinder, <i>B</i> the +piston, and <i>C</i> its rod, encased in the half-trunk, <i>D</i>. The +plug-rod, <i>G</i>, moves the single pair of valves by striking the +catches, <i>E</i> and <i>F</i>, as was usual with Watt’s earlier engines.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[123]</a></span>Watt’s steam-hammer was patented at the same time. +It is seen in <a href="#Fig34">Fig. 34</a>, in which <i>A</i> is the steam-cylinder and +<i>B</i> its rod, the engine being evidently of the form just described. +It works a beam, <i>C C</i>, which in turn, by the rod, +<i>M</i>, works the hammer-helve, <i>L J</i>, and the hammer, <i>L</i>. The +beam, <i>F G</i>, is a spring, and the block, <i>N</i>, the anvil.</p> + +<p>Watt found it impossible to determine the duty of his +engines at all times by measurement of the work itself, +and endeavored to find a way of ascertaining the power +produced, by ascertaining the pressure of steam within +the cylinder. This pressure was so variable, and subject +to such rapid as well as extreme fluctuations, that +he found it impossible to make use of the steam-gauge +constructed for use on the boiler. He was thus driven to +invent a special instrument for this work, which he called +the “steam-engine indicator.” This consisted of a little +steam-cylinder containing a nicely-fitting piston, which +moved without noticeable friction through a range which +was limited by the compression of a helical spring, by means +of which the piston was secured to the top of its cylinder. +The distance through which the piston rose was proportional +to the pressure exerted upon it, and a pointer attached +to its rod traversed a scale upon which the pressure +per square inch could be read. The lower end of the instrument +being connected with the steam-cylinder of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[124]</a></span> +engine by a small pipe fitted with a cock, the opening of +the latter permitted steam from the engine-cylinder to fill +the indicator-cylinder, and the pressure of steam was always +the same in both cylinders. The indicator-pointer therefore +traversed the pressure-scale, always exhibiting the +pressure existing at the instant in the cylinder of the engine. +When the engine was at rest and steam off, the indicator-piston +stood at the same level as when detached from the +engine, and the pointer stood at 0 on the scale. When +steam entered, the piston rose and fell with the fluctuations +of pressure; and when the exhaust-valve opened, discharging +the steam and producing a vacuum in the steam-cylinder, +the pointer of the indicator dropped below 0, showing +the degree of exhaustion. Mr. Southern, one of Watt’s +assistants, fitted the instrument with a sliding board, moved +horizontally backward and forward by a cord or link-work +connecting directly or indirectly with the engine-beam, and +thus giving it a motion coincident with that of the piston. +This board carried a piece of paper, upon which a pencil +attached to the indicator piston-rod drew a curve. The +vertical height of any point on this curve above the base-line +measured the pressure in the cylinder at the moment +when it was made, and the horizontal distance of the point +from either end of the diagram determined the position, at +the same moment, of the engine-piston. The curve thus +inscribed, called the “indicator card,” or indicator diagram, +exhibiting every minute change in the pressure of steam in +the engine, not only enabled the mean pressure and the +power of the engine to be determined by its measurement, +but, to the eye of the expert engineer, it was a perfectly +legible statement of the position of the valves of the engine, +and revealed almost every defect in the action of the engine +which could not readily be detected by external examination. +It has justly been called the “engineers’ stethoscope,” +opening the otherwise inaccessible parts of the steam-engine +to the inspection of the engineer even more satisfactorily<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[125]</a></span> +than the stethoscope of the physician gives him a knowledge +of the condition and working of organs contained +within the human body. This indispensable and now familiar +engineers’ instrument has since been modified and +greatly improved in detail.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig34" id="Fig34"></a> +<img src="images/illo150.png" alt="Watt's Steam Hammer" width="350" height="229" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 34.</span>—The Watt Hammer, 1784.</p></div> + +<p>The Watt engine had, by the construction of the improvements +described in the patents of 1782-’85, been given +its distinctive form, and the great inventor subsequently +did little more than improve it by altering the forms and +proportions of its details. As thus practically completed, +it embodied nearly all the essential features of the modern +engine; and, as we have seen, the marked features of our +latest practice—the use of the double cylinder for expansion, +the cut-off valve-gear, and surface-condensation—had +all been proposed, and to a limited extent introduced. The +growth of the steam-engine has here ceased to be rapid, and +the changes which followed the completion of the work of +James Watt have been minor improvements, and rarely, if +ever, real developments.</p> + +<p>Watt’s mind lost none of its activity, however, for many +years. He devised and patented a “smoke-consuming furnace,” +in which he led the gases produced on the introduction +of fresh fuel over the already incandescent coal, and +thus burned them completely. He used two fires, which +were coaled alternately. Even when busiest, also, he found +time to pursue more purely scientific studies. With Boulton, +he induced a number of well-known scientific men living +near Birmingham to join in the formation of a “Lunar +Society,” to meet monthly at the houses of its members, “at +the full of the moon.” The time was thus fixed in order +that those members who came from a distance should be +able to drive home, after the meetings, by moonlight. +Many such societies were then in existence in England; but +that at Birmingham was one of the largest and most distinguished +of them all. Boulton, Watt, Drs. Small, Darwin, +and Priestley, were the leaders, and among their occasional<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[126]</a></span> +visitors were Herschel, Smeaton, and Banks. Watt +called these meetings “Philosophers’ meetings.” It was +during the period of most active discussion at the “philosophers’ +meetings” that Cavendish and Priestley were experimenting +with mixtures of oxygen and hydrogen, to determine +the nature of their combustion. Watt took much +interest in the subject, and, when informed by Priestley +that he and Cavendish had both noticed a deposit of moisture +invariably succeeding the explosion of the mixed gases, +when contained in a cold vessel, and that the weight of this +water was approximately equal to the weight of the mixed +gases, he at once came to the conclusion that the union of +hydrogen with oxygen produced water, the latter being a +chemical compound, of which the former were constituents. +He communicated this reasoning, and the conclusions to +which it had led him, to Boulton, in a letter written in December, +1782, and addressed a letter some time afterward +to Priestley, which was to have been read before the Royal +Society in April, 1783. The letter was not read, however, +until a year later, and, three months after, a paper by Cavendish, +making the same announcement, had been laid before +the Society. Watt stated that both Cavendish and Lavoisier, +to whom also the discovery is ascribed, received the +idea from him.</p> + +<p>The action of chlorine in bleaching organic coloring-matters, +by (as since shown) decomposing them and combining +with their hydrogen, was made known to Watt by +M. Berthollet, the distinguished French chemist, and the +former immediately introduced its use into Great Britain, +by inducing his father-in-law, Mr. Macgregor, to make a +trial of it.</p> + +<p>The copartnership of Boulton & Watt terminated by +limitation, and with the expiration of the patents under +which they had been working, in the first year of the present +century; and both partners, now old and feeble, withdrew +from active business, leaving their sons to renew the agreement<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[127]</a></span> +and to carry on the business under the same firm-style.</p> + +<p>Boulton, however, still interested himself in some +branches of manufacture, especially in his mint, where he +had coined many years and for several nations.</p> + +<p>Watt retired, a little later, to Heathfield, where he +passed the remainder of his life in peaceful enjoyment of +the society of his friends, in studies of all current matters +of interest in science, as well as in engineering. One by +one his old friends died—Black in 1799, Priestley, an exile +to America, in 1803, and Robison a little later. Boulton +died, at the age of eighty-one, August 17, 1809, and even +the loss of this nearest and dearest of his friends outside the +family was a less severe blow than that of his son Gregory, +who died in 1804.</p> + +<p>Yet the great engineer and inventor was not depressed +by the loneliness which was gradually coming upon him. +He wrote: “I know that all men must die, and I submit +to the decrees of Nature, I hope, with due reverence to +the Disposer of events;” and neglected no opportunity to +secure amusement or instruction, and kept body and mind +constantly occupied. He still attended the weekly meetings +of the club, meeting Rennie and Telford, and other +distinguished men of his own and the succeeding generation. +He lost nothing of his fondness for invention, and +spent many months in devising a machine for copying +statuary, which he had not perfected to his own satisfaction +at the time of his death, ten years later. This machine +was a kind of pentagraph, which could be worked +in any plane, and in which the marking-pencil gave place +to a cutting-tool. The tracing-point followed the surface +of the pattern, while the cutting-point, following its motion +precisely, formed a fac-simile in the material operated +upon.</p> + +<p>In the year 1800 he invented the water-main which was +laid down by the Glasgow Water-Works Company across<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[128]</a></span> +the Clyde. The joints were spherical and articulated, like +those of the lobster’s tail.</p> + +<p>His workshop, of which a <a href="#Fig28">sketch</a> is hereafter given, as +drawn by the artist Skelton, was in the garret of his house, +and was well supplied with tools and all kinds of laboratory +material. His lathe and his copying-machine were placed +before the window, and his writing-desk in the corner. +Here he spent the greater part of his leisure time, often +even taking his meals in the little shop, rather than go to +the table for them. Even when very old, he occasionally +made a journey to London or Glasgow, calling on his old +friends and studying the latest engineering devices and inspecting +public works, and was everywhere welcomed by +young and old as the greatest living engineer, or as the kind +and wise friend of earlier days.</p> + +<p>He died August 19, 1819, in the eighty-third year of his +age, and was buried in Handsworth Church. The sculptor +Chantrey was employed to place a fitting monument above +his grave, and the nation erected a statue of the great man +in Westminster Abbey.</p> + +<p>This sketch of the greatest of all the inventors of the +steam-engine has been given no greater length than its subject +justifies. Whether we consider Watt as the inventor +of the standard steam-engine of the nineteenth century, as +the scientific investigator of the physical principles upon +which the invention is based, or as the builder and introducer +of the most powerful known instrument by which the +“great sources of power in Nature are converted, adapted, +and applied for the use and convenience of man,” he is fully +entitled to preëminence. His character as a man was no +less admirable than as an engineer.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig35" id="Fig35"></a> +<img src="images/illo156.png" alt="Watt's Workshop" width="400" height="260" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 35.</span>—James Watt’s Workshop.<br />(From Smiles’s “Lives +of Boulton and Watt.”)</p></div> + +<p>Smiles, Watt’s most conscientious and indefatigable +biographer, writes:<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id="FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a></p> + +<p>“Some months since, we visited the little garret at<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[129]</a></span> +Heathfield in which Watt pursued the investigations +of his later years. The room had been carefully locked +up since his death, and had only once been swept out. +Everything lay very much as he left it. The piece of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[130]</a></span> +iron which he was last employed in turning, lay on the +lathe. The ashes of the last fire were in the grate; the last +bit of coal was in the scuttle. The Dutch oven was in its +place over the stove, and the frying-pan in which he cooked +his meals was hanging on its accustomed nail. Many objects +lay about or in the drawers, indicating the pursuits +which had been interrupted by death—busts, medallions, +and figures, waiting to be copied by the copying-machine—many +medallion-moulds, a store of plaster-of-Paris, and a +box of plaster casts from London, the contents of which do +not seem to have been disturbed. Here are Watt’s ladles +for melting lead, his foot-rule, his glue-pot, his hammer. +Reflecting mirrors, an extemporized camera with the lenses +mounted on pasteboard, and many camera-glasses laid about, +indicate interrupted experiments in optics. There are quadrant-glasses, +compasses, scales, weights, and sundry boxes +of mathematical instruments, once doubtless highly prized. +In one place a model of the governor, in another of the +parallel-motion, and in a little box, fitted with wooden cylinders +mounted with paper and covered with figures, is what +we suppose to be a model of his calculating-machine. On +the shelves are minerals and chemicals in pots and jars, on +which the dust of nearly half a century has settled. The +moist substances have long since dried up; the putty has +been turned to stone, and the paste to dust. On one shelf +we come upon a dish in which lies a withered bunch of +grapes. On the floor, in a corner, near to where Watt sat +and worked, is a hair-trunk—a touching memorial of a long-past +love and a long-dead sorrow. It contains all poor +Gregory’s school-books, his first attempts at writing, his +boy’s drawings of battles, his first school-exercises down to +his college-themes, his delectuses, his grammars, his dictionaries, +and his class-books—brought into this retired room, +where the father’s eye could rest upon them. Near at hand +is the sculpture-machine, on which he continued working to +the last. Its wooden frame is worm-eaten, and dropping<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[131]</a></span> +into dust, like the hands that made it. But though the +great workman is gone to rest, with all his griefs and cares, +and his handiwork is fast crumbling to decay, the spirit of +his work, the thought which he put into his inventions, still +survives, and will probably continue to influence the destinies +of his race for all time to come.”</p> + +<p>The visitor to Westminster Abbey will find neither monarch, +nor warrior, nor statesman, nor poet, honored with a +nobler epitaph than that which is inscribed on the pedestal +of Chantrey’s monument to Watt:</p> + +<p class="center" style="line-height: 1.75em;"> +<span class="smcap">Not to perpetuate a Name</span>,<br /> +<span class="fsize80">WHICH MUST ENDURE WHILE THE PEACEFUL ARTS FLOURISH,<br /> +BUT TO SHOW<br /> +THAT MANKIND HAVE LEARNT TO HONOR THOSE WHO BEST DESERVE THEIR<br /> +GRATITUDE,</span><br /> +<span class="fsize125"><span class="gesp">THE KIN</span>G,</span><br /> +<span class="fsize80">HIS MINISTERS, AND MANY OF THE NOBLES AND COMMONERS OF THE REALM,<br /> +RAISED THIS MONUMENT TO</span><br /> +<span class="fsize150"><span class="gesp">JAMES WAT</span>T,</span><br /> +<span class="fsize80">WHO, DIRECTING THE FORCE OF AN ORIGINAL GENIUS,<br /> +EARLY EXERCISED IN PHILOSOPHIC RESEARCH,<br /> +TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF</span><br /> +<span class="fsize125"><span class="gesp">THE STEAM-ENGIN</span>E,</span><br /> +<span class="fsize80">ENLARGED THE RESOURCES OF HIS COUNTRY, INCREASED THE POWER OF MAN,<br /> +AND ROSE TO AN EMINENT PLACE<br /> +AMONG THE MOST ILLUSTRIOUS FOLLOWERS OF SCIENCE AND THE REAL<br /> +BENEFACTORS OF THE WORLD.</span><br /> +<span class="smcap">Born at Greenock, MDCCXXXVI.<br /> +Died at Heathfield, in Staffordshire, MDCCCXIX.</span></p> + +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[132]</a></p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig_Watts_Tomb" id="Fig_Watts_Tomb"></a> +<img src="images/illo159.png" alt="Watt's Tomb" width="365" height="350" /> +<p class="caption" >Tomb of James Watt.</p></div> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<h4><span class="smcap">Section II.—The Contemporaries of James Watt.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>In the chronology of the steam-engine, the contemporaries +of Watt have been so completely overshadowed by the +greater and more successful inventor, as to have been almost +forgotten by the biographer and by the student of history. +Yet, among the engineers and engine-builders, as well as +among the inventors of his day, Watt found many enterprising +rivals and keen competitors. Some of these men, had +they not been so completely fettered by Watt’s patents, +would have probably done work which would have entitled +them to far higher honor than has been accorded them.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">William Murdoch</span> was one of the men to whom Watt, +no less than the world, was greatly indebted. For many years +he was the assistant, friend, and coadjutor of Watt; and it +is to his ingenuity that we are to give credit for not only<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[133]</a></span> +many independent inventions, but also for the suggestions +and improvements which were often indispensable to the +formation and perfection of some of Watt’s own inventions.</p> + +<p>Murdoch was employed by Boulton & Watt in 1776, +and was made superintendent of construction in the engine +department, and given general charge of the erection of engines. +He was sent into Cornwall, and spent in that district +much of the time during which he served the firm, erecting +pumping-engines, the construction of which for so +many years constituted a large part of the business of the +Soho establishment. He was looked upon by both Boulton +and Watt as a sincere friend, as well as a loyal adherent, +and from 1810 to 1830 was given a partner’s share of the +income of the firm, and a salary of £1,000. He retired from +business at the last of the two dates named, and, dying in +1839, was buried near the two partners in Handsworth +Church.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig36" id="Fig36"></a> +<img src="images/illo161.png" alt="Murdoch's Oscillating Engine" width="270" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 36.</span>—Murdoch’s Oscillating Engine, 1785.</p></div> + +<p>Murdoch made a model, in 1784, of the locomotive patented +by Watt in that year. He devised the arrangement +of “sun-and-planet wheels,” adopted for a time in all of +Watt’s “rotative” engines, and invented the oscillating +steam-engine (<a href="#Fig36">Fig. 36</a>) in 1785, using the “D-slide valves,” +<i>G</i>, moved by the gear, <i>E</i>, which was driven by an eccentric +on the shaft, without regard to the oscillation of the cylinder, +<i>A</i>. He was the inventor of a rotary engine and of +many minor machines for special purposes, and of many +machine-tools used at Soho in building engines and machines. +He seems, like Watt, to have had special fondness +for the worm-gear, and introduced it wherever it could +properly take the place of ordinary gearing. Some of the +machines designed by Watt and Murdoch, who always +worked well together, were found still in use and in good +working condition by the author when visiting the works at +Soho in 1873. The old mint in which, from 1797 to 1805, +Boulton had coined 4,000 tons of copper, had then been +pulled down, and a new mint had been erected in 1860.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[134]</a></span> +Many old machines still remained about the establishment +as souvenirs of the three great mechanics.</p> + +<p>Outside of Soho, Murdoch also found ample employment +for his inventive talent. In 1792, while at Redruth, his +residence before finally returning to Soho, he was led to +speculate upon the possibility of utilizing the illuminating +qualities of coal-gas, and, convinced of its practicability, he +laid the subject before the Royal Society in 1808, and was +awarded the Rumford gold medal. He had, ten years earlier, +lighted a part of the Soho works with coal-gas, and in +1803 Watt authorized him to extend his pipes throughout +all the buildings. Several manufacturers promptly introduced +the new light, and its use extended very rapidly.</p> + +<p>Still another of Murdoch’s favorite schemes was the +transmission of power by the use of compressed air. He +drove the pattern-shop engine at Soho by means of air from +the blowing-engine in the foundery, and erected a pneumatic +lift to elevate castings from the foundery-floor to the canal-bank.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[135]</a></span> +He made a steam-gun, introduced the heating of +buildings by the circulation of hot water, and invented the +method of transmitting packages through tubes by the impulse +of compressed air, as now practised by the “pneumatic +dispatch” companies. He died at the age of eighty-five +years.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig37" id="Fig37"></a> +<img src="images/illo163.png" alt="Hornblower's Compound Engine" width="400" height="476" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 37.</span>—Hornblower’s Compound Engine, 1781.</p></div> + +<p>Among the most active and formidable of Watt’s business +rivals was <span class="smcap">Jonathan Hornblower</span>, the patentee of +the “compound” or double-cylinder engine. A sketch of +this engine, as patented by Hornblower in 1781, is here +given (<a href="#Fig37">Fig. 37</a>). It was first described by the inventor in +the “Encyclopædia Britannica.” It consists, as is seen by +reference to the engraving, of two steam-cylinders, <i>A</i> and +<i>B</i>—<i>A</i> being the low and <i>B</i> the high pressure cylinder—the +steam leaving the latter being exhausted into the former, +and, after doing its work there, passing into the condenser, +as already described. The piston-rods, <i>C</i> and <i>D</i>, are both +connected to the same part of the beam by chains, as in the +other early engines. These rods pass through stuffing-boxes +in the cylinder-heads, which are fitted up like those seen on +the Watt engine. Steam is led to the engine through the +pipe, <i>G Y</i>, and cocks, <i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>, and <i>d</i>, are adjustable, as required, +to lead steam into and from the cylinders, and are +moved by the plug-rod, <i>W</i>, which actuates handles not +shown. <i>K</i> is the exhaust-pipe leading to the condenser. <i>V</i> +is the engine feed-pump rod, and <i>X</i> the great rod carrying +the pump-buckets at the bottom of the shaft.</p> + +<p>The cocks <i>c</i> and <i>a</i> being open and <i>b</i> and <i>d</i> shut, the +steam passes from the boiler into the upper part of the +steam-cylinder, <i>B</i>; and the communication between the +lower part of <i>B</i> and the top of <i>A</i> is also open. Before +starting, steam being shut off from the engine, the great +weight of the pump-rod, <i>X</i>, causes that end of the beam to +preponderate, the pistons standing, as shown, at the top of +their respective steam-cylinders.</p> + +<p>The engine being freed from all air by opening all the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[136]</a></span> +valves and permitting the steam to drive it through the engine +and out of the condenser through the “snifting-valve,” +<i>O</i>, the valves <i>b</i> and <i>d</i> are closed, and the cock in the exhaust-pipe opened.</p> + +<p>The steam beneath the piston of the large cylinder is +immediately condensed, and the pressure on the upper side +of that piston causes it to descend, carrying that end of the +beam with it, and raising the opposite end with the pump-rods +and their attachments. At the same time, the steam +from the lower end of the small high-pressure cylinder being +let into the upper end of the larger cylinder, the completion +of the stroke finds a cylinder full of steam transferred from +the one to the other with corresponding increase of volume +and decrease of pressure. While expanding and diminishing +in pressure as it passes from the smaller into the larger<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[137]</a></span> +cylinder, this charge of steam gradually resists less and less +the pressure of the steam from the boiler on the upper side +of the piston of the small cylinder, <i>B</i>, and the net result is +the movement of the engine by pressures exerted on the +upper sides of both pistons and against pressures of less intensity +on the under sides of both. The pressures in the +lower part of the small cylinder, in the upper part of the +large cylinder, and in the communicating passage, are evidently +all equal at any given time.</p> + +<p>When the pistons have reached the bottoms of their respective +cylinders, the valves at the top of the small cylinder, +<i>B</i>, and at the bottom of the large cylinder, <i>A</i>, are +closed, and the valves <i>c</i> and <i>d</i> are opened. Steam from +the boiler now enters beneath the piston of the small cylinder; +the steam in the larger cylinder is exhausted into +the condenser, and the steam already in the small cylinder +passes over into the large cylinder, following up the piston +as it rises.</p> + +<p>Thus, at each stroke a small cylinder full of steam is +taken from the boiler, and the same weight, occupying the +volume of the larger cylinder, is exhausted into the condenser +from the latter cylinder.</p> + +<p>Referring to the method of operation of this engine, +Prof. Robison demonstrated that the effect produced was +the same as in Watt’s single-cylinder engine—a fact which +is comprehended in the law enunciated many years later by +Rankine, that, “so far as the theoretical action of the steam +on the piston is concerned, it is immaterial whether the +expansion takes place in one cylinder, or in two or more +cylinders.” It was found, in practice, that the Hornblower +engine was no more economical than the Watt engine; +and that erected at the Tin Croft Mine, Cornwall, in 1792, +did even less work with the same fuel than the Watt engines.</p> + +<p>Hornblower was prosecuted by Boulton & Watt for +infringement. The suit was decided against him, and he<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[138]</a></span> +was imprisoned in default of payment of the royalty, and +fine demanded. He died a disappointed and impoverished +man. The plan thus unsuccessfully introduced by Hornblower +was subsequently modified and adopted by others +among the contemporaries of Watt; and, with higher steam +and the use of the Watt condenser, the “compound” gradually +became a standard type of steam-engine.</p> + +<p>Arthur Woolf, in 1804, re-introduced the Hornblower or +Falck engine, with its two steam-cylinders, using steam of +higher tension. His first engine was built for a brewery in +London, and a considerable number were subsequently +made. Woolf expanded his steam from six to nine times, +and the pumping-engines built from his plans were said to +have raised about 40,000,000 pounds one foot high per bushel +of coals, when the Watt engine was raising but little more +than 30,000,000. In one case, a duty of 57,000,000 was +claimed.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig38" id="Fig38"></a> +<img src="images/illo166.png" alt="Bull's Pumping Engine" width="323" height="500" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 38.</span>—Bull’s Pumping-Engine, 1798.</p> +<p class="center fsize80"><a href="images/large166.png">Large scale image</a> (434 kB).</p></div> + +<p>The most successful of those competitors of Watt who +endeavored to devise a peculiar form of pumping-engine, +which should have the efficiency of that of Boulton & Watt, +and the necessary advantage in first cost, were <span class="smcap">William +Bull</span> and <span class="smcap">Richard Trevithick</span>.<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id="FNanchor_42_42"></a><a +href="#Footnote_42_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a> The accompanying +<a href="#Fig38">illustration</a> shows the design, which was then known as +the “Bull Cornish Engine.”</p> + +<p>The steam-cylinder, <i>a</i>, is carried on wooden beams, <i>b</i>, +extending across the engine-house directly over the pump-well. +The piston-rod, <i>c</i>, is secured to the pump-rods, +<i>d d</i>, the cylinder being inverted, and the pumps, <i>e</i>, in the +shaft, <i>f</i>, are thus operated without the intervention of +the beam invariably seen in Watt’s engines. A connecting-rod, +<i>g</i>, attached to the pump-rod and to the end of a +balance-beam, <i>h</i>, operates the latter, and is counterbalanced +by a weight, <i>i</i>. The rod, <i>j</i>, serves both as a plug-rod and +as an air-pump connecting-rod. A snifting-valve, <i>k</i>, opens<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[139]</a></span> +when the engine is blown through, and relieves the condenser +and air-pump, <i>l</i>, of all air. The rod, <i>m</i>, operates a +solid air-pump piston, the valves of the pump being placed +on either side at the base, instead of in the pump-bucket, as<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[140]</a></span> +in Watt’s engines. The condensing-water cistern was a +wooden tank, <i>n</i>. A jet “pipe-condenser,” <i>o</i>, was used +instead of a jet condenser of the form adopted by other +makers, and was supplied with water through the cock, <i>p</i>. +The plug-rod, <i>q</i>, as it rises and falls with the pump-rods +and balance-beam, operates the “gear-handles,” <i>r r</i>, and +opens and closes the valves, <i>s s</i>, at the required points in +the stroke. The attendant works these valves by hand, in +starting, from the floor, <i>t</i>. The operation of the engine +is similar to that of a Watt engine. It is still in use, +with a few modifications and improvements, and is a very +economical and durable machine. It has not been as generally +adopted, however, as it would probably have been had +not the legal proscription of Watt’s patents so seriously interfered +with its introduction. Its simplicity and lightness are +decided advantages, and its designers are entitled to great +credit for their boldness and ingenuity, as displayed in their +application of the minor devices which distinguish the engine. +The design is probably to be credited to Bull originally; +but Trevithick built some of these engines, and is +supposed to have greatly improved them while working +with Edward Bull, the son of the inventor, William Bull. +One of these engines was erected by them at the Herland +Mine, Cornwall, in 1798, which had a steam-cylinder +60 inches in diameter, and was built on the plan just described.</p> + +<p>Another of the contemporaries of James Watt was a +clergyman, <span class="smcap">Edward Cartwright</span>, the distinguished inventor +of the power-loom, and of the first machine ever used in +combing wool, who revived Watt’s plan of surface-condensation +in a somewhat modified form. Watt had made a +“pipe-condenser,” similar in plan to those now often used, +but had simply immersed it in a tank of water, instead of in +a constantly-flowing stream. Cartwright proposed to use +two concentric cylinders or spheres, between which the +steam entered when exhausted from the cylinder of the engine,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[141]</a></span> +and was condensed by contact with the metal surfaces. +Cold water within the smaller and surrounding the exterior +vessel kept the metal cold, and absorbed the heat discharged +by the condensing vapor.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig39" id="Fig39"></a> +<img src="images/illo168.png" alt="Cartwright's Engine" width="350" height="453" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 39.</span>—Cartwright’s Engine, 1798.</p></div> + +<p>Cartwright’s engine is best described in the <i>Philosophical +Magazine</i> of June, 1798, from which the accompanying +<a href="#Fig39">sketch</a> is copied.</p> + +<p>The object of the inventor is stated to have been to +remedy the defects of the Watt engine—imperfect vacuum, +friction, and complication.</p> + +<p>In the figure, the steam-cylinder takes steam through +the pipe, <i>B</i>. The piston, <i>R</i>, has a rod extending downward +to the smaller pump-piston, <i>G</i>, and upward to the +cross-head, which, in turn, drives the cranks above, by +means of connecting-rods. The shafts thus turned are connected<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[142]</a></span> +by a pair of gears, <i>M L</i>, of which one drives a +pinion on the shaft of the fly-wheel. <i>D</i> is the exhaust-pipe +leading to the condenser, <i>F</i>; and the pump, <i>G</i>, removes +the air and water of condensation, forcing it into +the hot-well, <i>H</i>, whence it is returned to the boiler through +the pipe, <i>I</i>. A float in <i>H</i> adjusts an air-valve, so as to +keep a supply of air in the chamber, to serve as a cushion +and to make an air-chamber of the reservoir, and permits +the excess to escape. The large tank contains the water +supplied for condensing the steam.</p> + +<p>The piston, <i>R</i>, is made of metal, and is packed with +two sets of cut metal rings, forced out against the sides of +the cylinder by steel springs, the rings being cut at three +points in the circumference, and kept in place by the springs. +The arrangement of the two cranks, with their shafts and +gears, is intended to supersede Watt’s plan for securing a +perfectly rectilinear movement of the head of the piston-rod, +without friction.</p> + +<p>In the accounts given of this engine, great stress is laid +upon the supposed important advantage here offered, by the +introduction of the surface-condenser, of permitting the employment +of a working-fluid other than steam—as, for example, +alcohol, which is too valuable to be lost. It was +proposed to use the engine in connection with a still, and +thus to effect great economy by making the fuel do double +duty. The only part of the plan which proved both novel +and valuable was the metallic packing and piston, which +has not yet been superseded. The engine itself never came +into use.</p> + +<p>At this point, the history of the steam-engine becomes +the story of its applications in several different directions, +the most important of which are the raising of water—which +had hitherto been its only application—the locomotive-engine, +the driving of mill-machinery, and steam-navigation.</p> + +<p>Here we take leave of James Watt and of his contemporaries,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[143]</a></span> +of the former of whom a French author<a name="FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> +says: “The +part which he played in the mechanical applications of the +power of steam can only be compared to that of Newton in +astronomy and of Shakespeare in poetry.” Since the time +of Watt, improvements have been made principally in matters +of mere detail, and in the extension of the range of +application of the steam-engine.</p> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> The same story is told of Savery and of Worcester.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> Robison’s “Mechanical Philosophy,” edited by Brewster.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> “Reminiscences of James Watt,” Robert Hart; “Transactions of the +Glasgow Archæological Society,” 1859.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> “Lives of Boulton and Watt,” Smiles.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> For the privilege of using the fly-wheel to regulate the motion of the +engine, Boulton & Watt paid a royalty to Matthew Wasborough, who had +patented it, and who held also the patent for its combination with a crank, +as invented by Pickard and Steed.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> “Lives of Boulton and Watt,” Smiles.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> “Life of Watt,” p. 512.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> For an exceedingly interesting and very faithful account of their +work, <i>see</i> “Life of Richard Trevithick,” by F. Trevithick, London, 1872.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> Bataille. “Traité des Machines à Vapeur,” Paris, 1847.</p></div> + +<hr class="l05" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/illo170.png" alt="Ornament" width="250" height="222" /></div> + +<hr class="c40" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">[144]</a></span></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV"></a>CHAPTER IV.</h2> + +<h3><i>THE MODERN STEAM-ENGINE.</i></h3> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Those projects which abridge distance have done most for the civilization +and happiness of our species.”—<span class="smcap">Macaulay.</span></p></div> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<h4><span class="smcap">The Second Period of Application—1800-’40. +Steam-Locomotion on Railroads.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig40" id="Fig40"></a> +<img src="images/illo171.png" alt="First Railroad-Car" width="350" height="234" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 40.</span>—The First Railroad-Car, 1825.</p></div> + +<p>Introductory.—The commencement of the nineteenth +century found the modern steam-engine fully developed in +all its principal features, and fairly at work in many departments +of industry. The genius of Worcester, and Morland, +and Savery, and Desaguliers, had, in the first period of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">[145]</a></span> +application of the power of steam to useful work, effected a +beginning which, looked upon from a point of view which +exhibits its importance as the first step toward the wonderful +results to-day familiar to every one, appears in its true +light, and entitles those great men to even greater honor +than has been accorded them. The results actually accomplished, +however, were absolutely insignificant in comparison +with those which marked the period of development +just described. Yet even the work of Watt and of his contemporaries +was but a mere prelude to the marvellous advances +made in the succeeding period, to which we are now +come, and, in extent and importance, was insignificant in +comparison with that accomplished by their successors in +the development of all mechanical industries by the application +of the steam-engine to the movement of every kind +of machine.</p> + +<p>The first of the two periods of application saw the steam-engine +adapted simply to the elevation of water and the +drainage of mines; during the second period it was adapted +to every variety of useful work, and introduced wherever +the muscular strength of men and animals, or the power of +wind and of falling water, which had previously been the +only motors, had found application. A history of the development +of industries by the introduction of steam-power +during this period, would be no less extended and hardly +less interesting than that of the steam-engine itself.</p> + +<p>The way had been fairly opened by Boulton and Watt; +and the year 1800 saw a crowd of engineers and manufacturers +entering upon it, eager to reap the harvest of distinction +and of pecuniary returns which seemed so promising to all. +The last year of the eighteenth century was also the last of +the twenty-five years of partnership of Boulton & Watt, +and, with it, the patents under which that firm had held the +great monopoly of steam-engine building expired. The +right to manufacture the modern steam-engine was common +to all. Watt had, at the commencement of the new century,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">[146]</a></span> +retired from active business-life. Boulton remained +in business; but he was not the inventor of the new engine, +and could not retain, by the exercise of all his remaining +power, the privileges previously held by legal authorization.</p> + +<p>The young Boulton and the young Watt were not the +Boulton & Watt of earlier years; and, had they possessed +all of the business talent and all of the inventive genius of +their fathers, they could not have retained control of a business +which was now growing far more rapidly than the facilities +for manufacturing could be extended in any single establishment. +All over the country, and even on the Continent +of Europe, and in America, thousands of mechanics, and +many men of mechanical tastes in other professions, were +familiar with the principles of the new machine, and were +speculating upon its value for all the purposes to which it +has since been applied; and a multitude of enthusiastic mechanics, +and a larger multitude of visionary and ignorant +schemers, were experimenting with every imaginable device, +in the vain hope of attaining perpetual motion, and other +hardly less absurd results, by its modification and improvement. +Steam-engine building establishments sprang up +wherever a mechanic had succeeded in erecting a workshop +and in acquiring a local reputation as a worker in metal, +and many of Watt’s workmen went out from Soho to take +charge of the work done in these shops. Nearly all of the +great establishments which are to-day most noted for their +extent and for the importance and magnitude of the work +done in them, not only in Great Britain, but in Europe and +the United States, came into existence during this second +period of the application of the steam-engine as a prime +mover.</p> + +<p>The new establishments usually grew out of older shops +of a less pretentious character, and were managed by men +who had been trained by Watt, or who had had a still more +awakening experience with those who vainly strove to make<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">[147]</a></span> +up, by their ingenuity and by great excellence of workmanship, +the advantages possessed at Soho in a legal monopoly +and greater experience in the business.</p> + +<p>It was exceedingly difficult to find expert and conscientious +workmen, and machine-tools had not become as thoroughly +perfected as had the steam-engine itself. These +difficulties were gradually overcome, however, and thenceforward +the growth of the business was increasingly rapid.</p> + +<p>Every important form of engine had now been invented. +Watt had perfected, with the aid of Murdoch, both the +pumping-engine and the rotative steam-engine for application +to mills. He had invented the trunk engine, and Murdoch +had devised the oscillating engine and the ordinary +slide-valve, and had made a model locomotive-engine, while +Hornblower had introduced the compound engine. The +application of steam to navigation had been often proposed, +and had sometimes been attempted, with sufficient success +to indicate to the intelligent observer an ultimate triumph. +It only remained to extend the use of steam as a motor into +all known departments of industry, and to effect such improvements +in details as experience should prove desirable.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig41" id="Fig41"></a> +<img src="images/illo175.png" alt="Leupold's Engine" width="251" height="400" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 41.</span>—Leupold’s Engine, 1720.</p></div> + +<p>The engines of Hero, of Porta, and of Branca were, it +will be remembered, non-condensing; but the first plan of a +non-condensing engine that could be made of any really +practical use is given in the “Theatrum Machinarum” of +Leupold, published in 1720. This sketch is copied in <a href="#Fig41">Fig. +41</a>. It is stated by Leupold that this plan was suggested +by Papin. It consists of two single-acting cylinders, <i>r s</i>, receiving +steam alternately from the same steam-pipe through +a “four-way cock,” <i>x</i>, and exhausting into the atmosphere. +Steam is furnished by the boiler, <i>a</i>, and the pistons, <i>c d</i>, +are alternately raised and depressed, depressing and raising +the pump-rods, <i>k l</i>, to which they are attached by the beams, +<i>h g</i>, vibrating on the centres, <i>i i</i>. The water from the +pumps, <i>o p</i>, is forced up the stand-pipe, <i>q</i>, and discharged +at its top. The alternate action of the steam-pistons is secured<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">[148]</a></span> +by turning the “four-way cock,” <i>x</i>, first into the position +shown, and then, at the completion of the stroke, into +the reverse position, by which change the steam from the +boiler is then led into the cylinder, <i>s</i>, and the steam in <i>r</i> is +discharged into the atmosphere.<a name="FNanchor_44_44" id="FNanchor_44_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a></p> + +<p>Leupold states that he is indebted to Papin for the suggestion +of the peculiar valve here used. He also proposed +to use a Savery engine without condensation in raising +water. We have no evidence that this engine was ever +built.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig42" id="Fig42"></a> +<img src="images/illo176.png" alt="Newton's Steam-Carriage" width="350" height="178" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig.</span> 42.—Newton’s Steam-Carriage, 1680.</p></div> + +<p>The first rude scheme for applying steam to locomotion +on land was probably that of Isaac Newton, who, in 1680, +proposed the machine shown in the accompanying figure +(<a href="#Fig42">42</a>), which will be recognized as representing the scientific +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">[149]</a></span> +toy which is found in nearly every collection of illustrative +philosophical apparatus. As described in the “Explanation +of the Newtonian Philosophy,” it consists of a spherical +boiler, <i>B</i>, mounted on a carriage. Steam issuing from the +pipe, <i>C</i>, seen pointing directly backward, by its reaction +upon the carriage, drives the latter ahead. The driver, sitting +at <i>A</i>, controls the steam by the handle, <i>E</i>, and cock, +<i>F</i>. The fire is seen at <i>D</i>.</p> + +<p>When, at the end of the eighteenth century, the steam-engine +had been so far perfected that the possibility of its +successful application to locomotion had become fully and +very generally recognized, the problem of adapting it to +locomotion on land was attacked by many inventors.</p> + +<p>Dr. Robison had, as far back as in 1759, proposed it to +James Watt during one of their conferences, at a time +when the latter was even more ignorant than the former of +the principles which were involved in the construction of the +steam-engine, and this suggestion may have had some influence +in determining Watt to pursue his research; thus setting +in operation that train of thoughtful investigation and +experiment which finally earned for him his splendid fame.</p> + +<p>In 1765, that singular genius, Dr. Erasmus Darwin, +whose celebrity was acquired by speculations in poetry and +philosophy as well as in medicine, urged Matthew Boulton—subsequently +Watt’s partner, and just then corresponding +with our own Franklin in relation to the use of steam-power—to +construct a steam-carriage, or “fiery chariot,” as he<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">[150]</a></span> +poetically styled it, and of which he sketched a set of plans. +A young man named Edgeworth became interested in +the scheme, and, in 1768, published a paper which had secured +for him a gold medal from the Society of Arts. In +this paper he proposed railroads on which the carriages +were to be drawn by horses, <i>or by ropes from steam-winding +engines</i>.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig43" id="Fig43"></a> +<img src="images/illo177.png" alt="Read's Steam Carriage" width="350" height="467" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 43.</span>—Read’s Steam-Carriage, 1790.</p></div> + +<p><a name="Read" id="Read"></a>Nathan Read, of whom an account will be given hereafter, +when describing his attempt to introduce steam-navigation, +planned, and in 1790 obtained a patent for, a steam-carriage, +of which the sketch seen in <a href="#Fig43">Fig. 43</a> is copied from +the rough drawing accompanying his application. In the +figure, <i>A A A A</i> are the wheels; <i>B B</i>, pinions on the hubs +of the rear wheels, which are driven by a ratchet arrangement +on the racks, <i>G G</i>, connected with the piston-rods; +<i>C o</i> is the boiler; <i>D D</i>, the steam-pipes carrying steam to +the steam-cylinder, <i>E E</i>; <i>F F</i> are the engine-frames; <i>H</i> is +the “tongue” or “pole” of the carriage, and is turned by a +horizontal steering-wheel, with which it is connected by +the ropes or chains, <i>I K</i>, <i>I K</i>; <i>W W</i> are the cocks, which +serve to shut off steam from the engine when necessary, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">[151]</a></span> +to determine the amount of steam to be admitted. The +pipes <i>a a</i> are exhaust-pipes, which the inventor proposed +to turn so that they should point backward, in order to secure +the advantage of the effort of reaction of the expelled +steam. (!)</p> + +<p>Read made a model steam-carriage, which he exhibited +when endeavoring to secure assistance in furtherance of his +schemes, but seems to have given more attention to steam-navigation, +and nothing was ever accomplished by him in +this direction.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig44" id="Fig44"></a> +<img src="images/illo178.png" alt="Cugnot's Steam-Carriage" width="400" height="176" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 44.</span>—Cugnot’s Steam-Carriage, 1770.</p></div> + +<p>These were merely promising schemes, however. The +first actual experiment was made, as is supposed, by a +French army-officer, <span class="smcap">Nicholas Joseph Cugnot</span>, who in +1769 built a steam-carriage, which was set at work in presence +of the French Minister of War, the Duke de Choiseul. +The funds required by him were furnished by the Compte +de Saxe. Encouraged by the partial success of the first +locomotive, he, in 1770, constructed a second (<a href="#Fig44">Fig. 44</a>), +which is still preserved in the Conservatoire des Arts et +Métiers, Paris.</p> + +<p>This machine, when recently examined by the author, +was still in an excellent state of preservation. The carriage +and its machinery are substantially built and well-finished, +and exceedingly creditable pieces of work in every respect. +It surprises the engineer to find such evidence of the high<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">[152]</a></span> +character of the work of the mechanic Brezin a century ago. +The steam-cylinders were 13 inches in diameter, and the +engine was evidently of considerable power. This locomotive +was intended for the transportation of artillery. It +consists of two beams of heavy timber extending from end +to end, supported by two strong wheels behind, and one still +heavier but smaller wheel in front. The latter carries on +its rim blocks which cut into the soil as the wheel turns, +and thus give greater holding power. The single wheel is +turned by two single-acting engines, one on each side, supplied +with steam by a boiler (seen in the sketch) suspended +in front of the machine. The connection between the engines +and the wheels was effected by means of pawls, as +first proposed by Papin, which could be reversed when it +was desired to drive the machine backward. A seat is +mounted on the carriage-body for the driver, who steers the +machine by a train of gearing, which turns the whole frame, +carrying the machinery 15 or 20 degrees either way. This +locomotive was found to have been built on a tolerably satisfactory +general plan; but the boiler was too small, and +the steering apparatus was incapable of handling the carriage +with promptness.</p> + +<p>The death of one of Cugnot’s patrons, and the exile of +the other, put an end to Cugnot’s experiments.</p> + +<p>Cugnot was a mechanic by choice, and exhibited great +talent. He was a native of Vaud, in Lorraine, where he +was born in 1725. He served both in the French and the +German armies. While under the Maréchal de Saxe, he +constructed his first steam locomotive-engine, which only +disappointed him, as he stated, in consequence of the inefficiency +of the feed-pumps. The second was that built under +the authority of the Minister Choiseul, and cost 20,000 +livres. Cugnot received from the French Government a +pension of 600 livres. He died in 1804, at the age of seventy-nine +years.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig45" id="Fig45"></a> +<img src="images/illo180.png" alt="Murdoch's Model" width="404" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 45.</span>—Murdoch’s Model, 1784.</p></div> + +<p>Watt, at a very early period, proposed to apply his own<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">[153]</a></span> +engine to locomotion, and contemplated using either a non-condensing +engine or an air-surface condenser. He actually +included the locomotive-engine in his patent of 1784; and +his assistant, Murdoch, in the same year, made a working-model +locomotive (<a href="#Fig45">Fig. 45</a>), which was capable of running +at a rapid rate. This model, now deposited in the Patent +Museum at South Kensington, London, had a flue-boiler, +and its steam-cylinder was three-fourths of an inch in diameter, +and the stroke of piston 2 inches. The driving-wheels +were 9<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches diameter.</p> + +<p>Nothing was, however, done on a larger scale by either +Watt or Murdoch, who both found more than enough to +claim their attention in the construction and introduction +of other engines. Murdoch’s model is said to have run +from 6 to 8 miles an hour, its little driving-wheels making +from 200 to 275 revolutions per minute. As is seen in the +sketch, this model was fitted with the same form of engine, +known as the “grasshopper-engine,” which was used in the +United States by Oliver Evans.</p> + +<p>“To Oliver Evans,” says Dr. Ernest Alban, the distinguished +German engineer, “was it reserved to show the true +value of a long-known principle, and to establish thereon a +new and more simple method of applying the power of +steam—a method that will remain an eternal memorial to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">[154]</a></span> +its introducer.” Dr. Alban here refers to the earliest permanently +successful introduction of the non-condensing +high-pressure steam-engine.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port6" id="Port6"></a> +<img src="images/illo181.png" alt="Evans" width="350" height="444" /> +<p class="caption">Oliver Evans.</p></div> + +<p><span class="smcap"><a href="#Port6">Oliver Evans</a></span>, one of the most ingenious mechanics +that America has ever produced, was born at Newport, +Del., in 1755 or 1756, the son of people in very humble +circumstances.</p> + +<p>He was, in his youth, apprenticed to a wheelwright, and +soon exhibited great mechanical talent and a strong desire +to acquire knowledge. His attention was, at an early period, +drawn to the possible application of the power of +steam to useful purposes by the boyish pranks of one of his +comrades, who, placing a small quantity of water in a gun-barrel, +and ramming down a tight wad, put the barrel in +the fire of a blacksmith’s forge. The loud report which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">[155]</a></span> +accompanied the expulsion of the wad was an evidence to +young Evans of great and (as he supposed) previously undiscovered +power.</p> + +<p>Subsequently meeting with a description of a Newcomen +engine, he at once noticed that the elastic force of confined +steam was not there utilized. He then designed the non-condensing +engine, in which the power was derived exclusively +from the tension of high-pressure steam, and proposed +its application to the propulsion of carriages.</p> + +<p>About the year 1780, Evans joined his brothers, who +were millers by occupation, and at once employed his inventive +talent in improving the details of mill-work, and +with such success as to reduce the cost of attendance one-half, +and also to increase the fineness of the flour made. He +proved himself a very expert millwright.</p> + +<p>In 1786 he applied to the Pennsylvania Legislature for +a patent for the application of the steam-engine to driving +mills, and to the steam-carriage, but was refused it. In 1800 +or 1801, Evans, after consultation with Professor Robert +Patterson, of the University of Pennsylvania, and getting +his approval of the plans, commenced the construction of a +steam-carriage to be driven by a non-condensing engine. +He soon concluded, however, that it would be a better +scheme, pecuniarily, to adapt his engine, which was novel +in form and of small first cost, to driving mills; and he +accordingly changed his plans, and built an engine of 6 +inches diameter of cylinder and 18 inches stroke of piston, +which he applied with perfect success to driving a plaster-mill.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig46" id="Fig46"></a> +<img src="images/illo183.png" alt="Evans's Non-Condensing Engine" width="600" height="339" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 46.</span>—Evans’s Non-condensing Engine, 1800.</p></div> + +<p>This engine, which he called the “Columbian Engine,” +was of a peculiar form, as seen in <a href="#Fig46">Fig. 46</a>. The beam is supported +at one end by a rocking column; at the other, it is +attached directly to the piston-rod, while the crank lies beneath +the beam, the connecting-rod, 1, being attached to +the latter at the extreme end. The head of the piston-rod is +compelled to rise and fall in a vertical line by the “Evans’s<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">[156]</a></span> +parallelogram”—a kind of parallel-motion very similar to +one of those designed by Watt. In the sketch (<a href="#Fig46">Fig. 46</a>), 2 +is the crank, 3 the valve-motion, 4 the steam-pipe from the +boiler, <i>E</i>, 5 6 7 the feed-pipe leading from the pump, <i>F</i>. +<i>A</i> is the boiler. The flame from the fire on the grate, <i>H</i>, +passes under the boiler between brick walls, and back +through a central flue to the chimney, <i>I</i>.</p> + +<p>Subsequently, Evans continued to extend the applications +of his engine and to perfect its details; and, others +following in his track, the non-condensing engine is to-day +fulfilling the predictions which he made 70 years ago, when +he said:</p> + +<p>“I have no doubt that my engines will propel boats +against the current of the Mississippi, and wagons on turnpike +roads, with great profit....”</p> + +<p>“The time will come when people will travel in stages +moved by steam-engines from one city to another, almost +as fast as birds can fly, 15 or 20 miles an hour.... A carriage +will start from Washington in the morning, the passengers +will breakfast at Baltimore, dine at Philadelphia, +and sup in New York the same day....</p> + +<p>“Engines will drive boats 10 or 12 miles an hour, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">[157]</a></span> +there will be hundreds of steamers running on the Mississippi, +as predicted years ago.”<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id="FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a></p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig47" id="Fig47"></a> +<img src="images/illo184.png" alt="Oruktor Amphibolis" width="400" height="251" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 47.</span>—Evans’s “Oruktor Amphibolis,” 1804.</p></div> + +<p>In 1804, Evans applied one of his engines in the transportation +of a large flat-bottomed craft, built on an order +of the Board of Health of Philadelphia, for use in clearing +some of the docks along the water-front of the city. Mounting +it on wheels, he placed in it one of his 5-horse power +engines, and named the odd machine (<a href="#Fig47">Fig. 47</a>) “Oruktor +Amphibolis.” This steam dredging-machine, weighing +about 40,000 pounds, was then propelled very slowly from +the works, up Market Street, around to the Water-Works, and +then launched into the Schuylkill. The engine was then +applied to the paddle-wheel at the stern, and drove the +craft down the river to its confluence with the Delaware.</p> + +<p>In September of the same year, Evans laid before the +Lancaster Turnpike Company a statement of the estimated +expenses and profits of steam-transportation on the common +road, assuming the size of the carriage used to be sufficient +for transporting 100 barrels of flour 50 miles in 24 hours,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[158]</a></span> +and placed in competition with 10 wagons drawn by 5 +horses each.</p> + +<p>In the <a href="#Fig47">sketch</a> above given of the “Oruktor Amphibolis,” +the engine is seen to resemble that previously described. +The wheel, <i>A</i>, is driven by a rod depending from the end +of a beam, <i>B′ B</i>, the other end of which is supported at <i>E</i> +by the frame, <i>E F G</i>. The body of the machine is carried +on wheels, <i>K K</i>, driven by belts, <i>M M</i>, from the pulley on +the shaft carrying <i>A</i>. The paddle-wheel is seen at <i>W</i>. +Evans had some time previously sent Joseph Sampson to +England with copies of his plans, and by him they were +shown to Trevithick, Vivian, and other British engineers.</p> + +<p>Among other devices, the now familiar Cornish boiler, +having a single internal flue, and the Lancashire boiler, +having a pair of internal flues, were planned and used by +Evans.</p> + +<p>At about the time that he was engaged on his steam +dredging-machine, Evans communicated with Messrs. McKeever +& Valcourt, who contracted with him to build an +engine for a steam-vessel to ply between New Orleans and +Natchez on the Mississippi, the hull of the vessel to be built +on the river, and the machinery to be sent to the first-named +city to be set up in the boat. Financial difficulties +and low water combined to prevent the completion of the +steamer, and the engine was set at work driving a saw-mill, +where, until the mill was destroyed by fire, it sawed lumber +at the rate of 250 feet of boards per hour.</p> + +<p>Evans never succeeded in accomplishing in America as +great a success as had rewarded Watt in Great Britain; but +he continued to build steam-engines to the end of his life, +April 19, 1819, and was succeeded by his sons-in-law, James +Rush and David Muhlenberg.</p> + +<p>He exhibited equal intelligence and ingenuity in perfecting +the processes of milling, and in effecting improvements +in his own business, that of the millwright. When but +twenty-four years old, he invented a machine for making<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">[159]</a></span> +the wire teeth used in cotton and woolen cards, turning +them out at the rate of 3,000 per minute. A little later he +invented a card-setting machine, which cut the wire from +the reel, bent the teeth, and inserted them. In milling, he +invented a whole series of machines and attachments, including +the elevator, the “conveyor,” the “hopper-box,” the +“drill,” and the “descender,” and enabled the miller to +make finer flour, gaining over 20 pounds to the barrel, and +to do this at half the former cost of attendance. The introduction +of his improvements into Ellicott’s mills, near +Baltimore, where 325 barrels of flour were made per day, +was calculated to have saved nearly $5,000 per year in cost +of labor, and over $30,000 by increasing the production. +He wrote “The Young Steam-Engineer’s Guide,” and a +work which remained standard many years after his death, +“The Young Millwright’s Guide.” Less fortunate than his +transatlantic rival, he was nevertheless equally deserving +of fame. He has sometimes been called “The Watt of +America.”</p> + +<p>The application of steam to locomotion on the common +road was much more successful in Great Britain than in the +United States. As early as 1786, William Symmington, +subsequently more successful in his efforts to introduce +steam for marine propulsion, assisted by his father, made a +working model of a steam-carriage, which did not, however, +lead to important results.</p> + +<p>In 1802, Richard Trevithick, a pupil of Murdoch’s, who +afterward became well known in connection with the introduction +of railroads, made a model steam-carriage, which +was patented in the same year. The model may still be +seen in the Patent Museum at South Kensington.<a name="FNanchor_46_46" id="FNanchor_46_46"></a><a +href="#Footnote_46_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a></p> + +<p>In this engine, high-pressure steam was employed, and +the condenser was dispensed with. The boiler was of the +form devised by Evans, and was subsequently generally<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[160]</a></span> +used in Cornwall, where it was called the “Trevithick +Boiler.” The engine had but one cylinder, and the piston-rod +drove a “cross-tail,” working in guides, which was connected +with a “cross-head” on the opposite side of the shaft +by two “side-rods.” The connecting-rod was attached to +the cross-head and the crank, “returning” toward the cylinder +as the shaft lay between the latter and the cross-head. +This was probably the first example of the now common +“return connecting-rod engine.” The connection between +the crank-shaft and the wheels of the carriage was effected +by gearing. The valve-gear and the feed-pumps were +worked from the engine-shaft. The inventor proposed to +secure his wheels against slipping by projecting bolts, when +necessary, through the rim of the wheel into the ground. +The first carriage of full size was built by Trevithick and +Vivian at Camborne, in 1803, and, after trial, was taken to +London, where it was exhibited to the public. <i>En route</i>, +it was driven by its own engines to Plymouth, 90 miles +from Camborne, and then shipped by water. It is not +known whether the inventor lost faith in his invention; but +he very soon dismantled the machine, sold the engine and +carriage separately, and returned to Cornwall, where he +soon began work on a railroad-locomotive.</p> + +<p>In 1821, Julius Griffiths, of Brompton, Middlesex, England, +patented a steam-carriage for the transportation of +passengers on the highway. His first road-locomotive was +built in the same year by Joseph Bramah, one of the ablest +mechanics of his time. The frame of the carriage carried a +large double coach-body between the two axles, and the +machinery was mounted over and behind the rear axle. +One man was stationed on a rear platform, to manage the +engine and to attend to the fire, and another, stationed in +front of the body of the coach, handled the steering-wheel. +The boiler was composed of horizontal water-tubes and +steam-tubes, the latter being so situated as to receive heat +from the furnace-gases <i>en route</i> to the chimney, and thus to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">[161]</a></span> +act as a superheater. The wheels were driven, by means +of intermediate gearing, by two steam-engines, which, with +their attachments, were suspended on helical springs, to +prevent injury by jars and shocks. An air-surface condenser +was used, consisting of flattened thin metal tubes, +cooled by the contact of the external air, and discharging +the water of condensation, as it accumulated within them, +into a feed-pump, which, in turn, forced it into the lowest +row of tubes in the boiler.</p> + +<p>The boiler did not prove large enough for continuous +work; but the carriage was used experimentally, now and +then, for a number of years.</p> + +<p>During the succeeding ten years the adaptation of the +steam-engine to land-transportation continued to attract +more and more attention, and experimental road-engines +were built with steadily-increasing frequency. The defects +of these engines revealing themselves on trial, they were +one by one remedied, and the road-locomotive gradually +assumed a shape which was mechanically satisfactory. Their +final introduction into general use seemed at one time only +a matter of time; their non-success was due to causes over +which the legislator and the general public, and not the engineer, +had control, as well as to the development of steam-transportation +on a rival plan.</p> + +<p>In 1822, David Gordon patented a road-engine, but it +is not known whether it was ever built. At about the same +time, Mr. Goldsworthy Gurney, who subsequently took an +active part in their introduction, stated, in his lectures, that +“elementary power is capable of being applied to propel +carriages along common roads with great political advantage, +and the floating knowledge of the day places the object +within reach.” He made an ammonia-engine—probably +the first ever made—and worked it so successfully, that +he made use of it in driving a little locomotive.</p> + +<p>Two years later, Gordon patented a curious arrangement, +which, however, had been proposed twelve years earlier by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">[162]</a></span> +Brunton, and was again proposed afterward by Gurney, and +others. This consisted in fitting to the engine a set of +jointed legs, imitating, as nearly as the inventor could make +them, the action of a horse’s legs and feet. Such an arrangement +was actually experimented with until it was +found that they could not be made to work satisfactorily, +when it was also found that they were not needed.</p> + +<p>During the same season, Burstall & Hill made a steam-carriage, +and made many unsuccessful attempts to introduce +their plan. The engine used was like that of Evans, except +that the steam-cylinder was placed at the end of the +beam, and the crank-shaft under the middle. The front +and rear wheels were connected by a longitudinal shaft and +bevel gearing. The boiler was found to have the usual defect, +and would only supply steam for a speed of three or +four miles an hour. The result was a costly failure. W. +H. James, of London, in 1824-’25, proposed several devices +for placing the working parts, as well as the body of the +carriage, on springs, without interfering with their operation, +and the Messrs. Seaward patented similar devices. +Samuel Brown, in 1826, introduced a gas-engine, in which +the piston was driven by the pressure produced by the +combustion of gas, and a vacuum was secured by the condensation +of the resulting vapor. Brown built a locomotive +which he propelled by this engine. He ascended Shooter’s +Hill, near London, and the principal cause of his ultimate +failure seems to have been the cost of operating the engine.</p> + +<p>From this date forward, during several years, a number +of inventors and mechanics seem to have devoted their +whole time to this promising scheme. Among them, Burstall +& Hill, Gurney, Ogle & Summers, Sir Charles Dance, +and Walter Hancock, were most successful.</p> + +<p>Gurney, in the year 1827, built a steam-carriage, which +he kept at work nearly two years in and about London, and +sometimes making long journeys. On one occasion he made +the journey from Meksham to Cranford Bridge, a distance<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">[163]</a></span> +of 85 miles, in 10 hours, including all stops. He used the +mechanical legs previously adopted by Brunton and by +Gordon, but omitted this rude device in those engines subsequently +built.</p> + +<p>Gurney’s engine of 1828 is of interest to the engineer as +exhibiting a very excellent arrangement of machinery, and +as having one of the earliest of “sectional boilers.” The +latter was of peculiar form, and differed greatly in design +from the sectional boiler invented a quarter of a century +earlier by John Stevens, in the United States.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig48" id="Fig48"></a> +<img src="images/illo190.png" alt="Gurney's Steam-Carriage" width="500" height="240" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 48.</span>—Gurney’s Steam-Carriage.</p> +<p class="center fsize80"><a href="images/large190.png">Large scale image</a> (241 kB).</p></div> + +<p>In the sketch (<a href="#Fig48">Fig. 48</a>) this boiler is seen at the right. +It was composed of bent <span class="fsize125"><b>◁</b></span>-shaped tubes, <i>a a</i>, connected to +two cylinders, <i>b b</i>, the upper one of which was a steam-chamber. +Vertical tubes connected these two chambers, +and permitted a complete and regular circulation of the +water. A separate reservoir, called a separator, <i>d</i>, was connected +with these chambers by pipes, as shown. From the +top of this separator a steam-pipe, <i>e e e</i>, conveyed steam to the +engine-cylinders at <i>f</i>. The cranks, <i>g</i>, on the rear axle were +turned by the engines, and the eccentric, <i>h</i>, on the axle drove +the valve-gearing and the valve, <i>i</i>. The link, <i>k l</i>, being +moved by a line, <i>l l</i>, led from the driver’s seat, the carriage +was started, stopped, or reversed, by throwing the upper end<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">[164]</a></span> +of the link into gear with the valve-stem, by setting the +link midway between its upper and lower positions, or by +raising it until the lower end, coming into action on the +valve-stem, produced a reverse motion of the valve. The +pin on which this link vibrated is seen at the centre of its +elliptical strap. The throttle-valve, <i>o</i>, by which the supply +of steam to the engine was adjusted, was worked by the lever, +<i>n</i>. The exhaust-pipe, <i>p</i>, led to the tank, <i>q</i>, and the uncondensed +vapor passed to the chimney, <i>s s</i>, by the pipe, <i>r r</i>. +The force-pump, <i>u</i>, taking feed-water from the tank, <i>t</i>, supplied +it to the boiler by the pipe, <i>x x x</i>, which, <i>en route</i>, was +coiled up to form a “heater” directly above the boiler. The +supply was regulated by the cock, <i>y</i>. The attendant had a +seat at <i>z</i>. A blast-apparatus, 1, was driven by an independent +engine, 2 3, and produced a forced blast, which was +led to the boiler-furnace through the air-duct, 5 5; 4 4 represents +the steam-pipe to the little blowing-engine. The +steering-wheel, 6, was directed by a lever, 7, and the change +of direction of the perch, 8, which turned about a king-bolt +at 9, gave the desired direction to the forward wheels and +to the carriage.</p> + +<p>This seems to have been one of the best designs brought +out at that time. The boiler, built to carry 70 pounds, was +safe and strong, and was tested up to 800 pounds pressure. +A forced draught was provided. The engines were well +placed, and of good design. The valve was arranged to +work the steam with expansion from half-stroke. The feed-water +was heated, and the steam slightly superheated. The +boiler here used has been since reproduced under new names +by later inventors, and is still used with satisfactory results. +Modifications of the “pipe-boiler” were made by several +other makers of steam-carriages also. Anderson & James +made their boilers of lap-welded iron tubes of one inch internal +diameter and one-fifth inch thick, and claimed for +them perfect safety. Such tubes should have sufficient +strength to sustain a pressure of 20,000 pounds per square<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">[165]</a></span> +inch. If made of such good iron as the makers claimed to +have put into them, “which worked like lead,” they would, +as was also claimed, when ruptured, open by tearing, and +discharge their contents without producing the usual disastrous +consequences of boiler explosions.</p> + +<p>The primary principle of the sectional boiler was then +well understood. The boilers of Ogle & Summers were +made up of pairs of upright tubes, set one within the other, +the intervening space being filled with water and steam, and +the flame passing through the inner and around the outer +tube of each pair.</p> + +<p>One of the engines of Sir James Anderson and W. H. +James was built in 1829. It had two 3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span>-inch steam-cylinders, +driving the rear wheels independently. In James’s +earlier plan of 1824-’25, a pair of cylinders was attached to +each of the two halves into which the rear axle was divided, +and were arranged to drive cranks set at right-angles with +each other. The later machine weighed 3 tons, and carried +15 passengers, on a rough graveled road across the Epping +Forest, at the rate of from 12 to 15 miles per hour. Steam +was carried at 300 pounds. Several tubes gave way in the +welds, but the carriage returned, carrying 24 passengers at +the rate of 7 miles per hour. On a later trial, with new +boilers, the carriage again made 15 miles per hour. It was, +however, subject to frequent accidents, and was finally +withdrawn.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Walter Hancock</span> was the most successful and persevering +of all those who attempted the introduction of steam +on the common road. He had, in 1827, patented a boiler +of such peculiar form, that it deserves description. It consisted +of a collection of flat chambers, of which the walls +were of boiler-plate. These chambers were arranged side +by side, and connected laterally by tubes and stays, and all +were connected by short vertical tubes to a horizontal large +pipe placed across the top of the boiler-casing, and serving +as a steam-drum or separator. This earliest of “sheet flue-boilers”<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">[166]</a></span> +did excellent service on Hancock’s steam-carriages, +where experience showed that there was little or no danger +of disruptive explosions.</p> + +<p>Hancock’s first steam-carriage was mounted on three +wheels, the leading-wheel arranged to swivel on a king-bolt, +and driven by a pair of oscillating cylinders connected with +its axle, which was “cranked” for the purpose. The engines +turned with the steering-wheel. This carriage was +by no means satisfactory, but it was used for a long time, +and traveled many hundreds of miles without once failing +to do the work assigned it.</p> + +<p>By this time there were a half-dozen steam-carriages +under construction for Hancock, for Ogle & Summers, and +for Sir Charles Dance.</p> + +<p>In 1831, Hancock placed a new carriage on a route between +London and Stratford, where it ran regularly for +hire. Dance, in the same season, started another on the +line between Cheltenham and Gloucester, where it ran from +February 21st to June 22d, traveling 3,500 miles and carrying +3,000 passengers, running the 9 miles in 55 minutes +usually, and sometimes in three-quarters of an hour, and +never meeting with an accident, except the breakage of an +axle in running over heaps of stones which had been purposely +placed on the road by enemies of the new system of +transportation. Ogle & Summers’s carriage attained a +speed, as testified by Ogle before a committee of the House +of Commons, of from 32 to 35 miles an hour, and on a rising +grade, near Southampton, at 24<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles per hour. They +carried 250 pounds of steam, ran 800 miles, and met with +no accident. Colonel Macerone, in 1833, ran a steam-carriage +of his own design from London to Windsor and back, +with 11 passengers, a distance of 23<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles, in 2 hours. Sir +Charles Dance, in the same year, ran his carriage 16 miles +an hour, and made long excursions at the rate of 9 miles an +hour. Still another experimenter, Heaton, ascended Lickey +Hill, between Worcester and Birmingham, on gradients of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">[167]</a></span> +one in eight and one in nine, in places; this was considered +one of the worst pieces of road in England. The carriage +towed a coach containing 20 passengers.</p> + +<p>Of all these, and many others, Hancock, however, had +most marked success. His coach, called the “Infant,” +which was set at work in February, 1831, was, a year later, +plying between London “City” and Paddington. Another, +called the “Era,” was built for the London and Greenwich +Steam-Carriage Company, which was mechanically a success. +The company, however, was financially unsuccessful. +In October, 1832, the “Infant” ran to Brighton from London, +carrying a party of 11, at the rate of 9 miles per hour, +ascending Redhill at a speed of 5 miles. They steamed 38 +miles the first day, stopping at night at Hazledean, and +reached Brighton next day, running 11 miles per hour. +Returning with 15 passengers, the coach ran 1 mile in less +than 4 minutes, and made 10 miles in 55 minutes. A run +from Stratford to Brighton was made in less than 10 hours, +at an average speed of 12 miles an hour running time, the +actual running time being less than 6 hours. The next +year another carriage, the “Enterprise,” was put on the +road to Paddington by Hancock for another company, and +ran regularly over two weeks; but this company was also +unsuccessful. In the summer of 1833 he brought out still +another steam-coach, the “Autopsy” (<a href="#Fig49">Fig. 49</a>), which he +ran to Brighton, and then, returning to London, manœuvred +the carriage in the crowded streets without difficulty or accident. +He went about the streets of London at all times, +and without hesitation. The coach next ran between Finsbury +Square and Pentonville regularly for four weeks, without +accident or delay. In the sketch, a part of the side is +broken away to show the machinery. The boiler, <i>A B</i>, +supplies steam through the steam-pipe, <i>H K</i>, to the steam-engine, +<i>C D</i>, which is coupled to the crank-shaft, <i>F</i>. <i>E</i> is +the feed-pump. The rear axle is turned by the endless +chain seen connecting it with the engine-shaft, and the rear<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">[168]</a></span> +wheels, <i>S</i>, are thus driven. A blower, <i>T</i>, gives a forced +draught. The driver sits at <i>M</i>, steering by the wheel, <i>N</i>, +which is coupled to the larger wheel, <i>P</i>, and thus turns the +forward axle into any desired position. In 1834, Hancock +built a steam “drag” on an Austrian order, which, carrying +10 persons and towing a coach containing 6 passengers, +was driven through the city beyond Islington, making 14 +miles an hour on a level, and 8 miles or more on rising +ground. In the same year he built the “Era,” and, in August, +put the “Autopsy” on with it, to make a steam-line +to Paddington. These coaches ran until the end of November, +carrying 4,000 passengers, at a usual rate of speed of +12 miles per hour. He then sent the “Era” to Dublin, +where, on one occasion, it ran 18 miles per hour.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig49" id="Fig49"></a> +<img src="images/illo195.png" alt="Hancock's Autopsy" width="400" height="183" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 49.</span>—Hancock’s “Autopsy,” 1833.</p></div> + +<p>In 1835 a large carriage, the “Erin,” was completed, +which was intended to carry 20 passengers. It towed three +omnibuses and a stage-coach, with 50 passengers, on a level +road, at the speed of 10 miles an hour. It drew an omnibus +with 18 passengers through Whitehall, Charing Cross, and +Regent Street, and out to Brentford, running 14 miles an +hour. It ran also to Reading, making 38 miles, with the +same load, in 3 hours and 8 minutes running time. The +stops <i>en route</i> occupied a half-hour. The same carriage +made 75 miles to Marlborough in 7<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> +hours running time,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">[169]</a></span> +stopping 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> hours on the road, in consequence of having +left the tender and supplies behind.</p> + +<p>In May, 1836, Hancock put all his carriages on the Paddington +road, and ran regularly for over five months, running +4,200 miles in 525 trips to Islington, 143 to Paddington, +and 44 to Stratford, passing through the city over 200 +times. The carriages averaged 5 hours and 17 or 18 minutes +daily running time. A light steam-phaeton, built in 1838, +for his own use, made 20 miles an hour, and was driven +about the city, and among horses and carriages, without +causing annoyance or danger. Its usual speed was about +10 miles an hour. Altogether, Hancock built nine steam-carriages, +capable of carrying 116 passengers in addition +to the regular attendants.<a name="FNanchor_47_47" id="FNanchor_47_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a></p> + +<p>In December, 1833, about 20 steam-carriages and traction +road-engines were running, or were in course of construction, +in and near London. In our own country, the +roughness of roads discouraged inventors; and in Great +Britain even, the successful introduction of road-locomotives, +which seemed at one time almost an accomplished +fact, finally met with so many obstacles, that even Hancock, +the most ingenious, persistent, and successful constructor, +gave up in despair. Hostile legislation procured by opposing +interests, and the rapid progress of steam-locomotion on +railroads, caused this result.</p> + +<p>In consequence of this interruption of experiment, almost +nothing was done during the succeeding quarter of a +century, and it is only within a few years that anything like +a business success has been founded upon the construction +of road-locomotives, although the scheme seems to have +been at no time entirely given up.</p> + +<p>The opposition of coach-proprietors, and of all classes +having an interest in the old lines of coaches, was most determined,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">[170]</a></span> +and the feeling evinced by them was intensely +bitter; but the advocates of the new system of transportation +were equally determined and persevering, and, having +right on their side, and the pecuniary advantage of the +public as their object, they would probably have succeeded +ultimately, except for the introduction of the still better +method of transportation by rail.</p> + +<p>In the summer of 1831, when the war between the two +parties was at its height, a committee of the British House +of Commons made a very complete investigation of the +subject. This committee reported that they had become +convinced that “the substitution of inanimate for animal +power, in draught on common roads, is one of the most important +improvements in the means of internal communication +ever introduced.” They considered its practicability +to have been “fully established,” and predicted that its +introduction would “take place more or less rapidly, in proportion +as the attention of scientific men shall be drawn, by +public encouragement, to further improvement.” The success +of the system had, as they stated, been retarded by +prejudice, adverse interests, and prohibitory tolls; and the +committee remark: “When we consider that these trials +have been made under the most unfavorable circumstances, +at great expense, in total uncertainty, without any of those +guides which experience has given to other branches of engineering; +that those engaged in making them are persons +looking solely to their own interests, and not theorists +attempting the perfection of ingenious models; when we +find them convinced, after long experience, that they are +introducing such a mode of conveyance as shall tempt the +public, by its superior advantages, from the use of the +admirable lines of coaches which have been generally established, +it surely cannot be contended that the introduction +of steam-carriages on common roads is, as yet, an uncertain +experiment, unworthy of legislative attention.”</p> + +<p>Farey, one of the most distinguished mechanical engineers<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">[171]</a></span> +of the time, testified that he considered the practicability +of such a system as fully established, and that the result +would be its general adoption. Gurney had run his carriage +between 20 and 30 miles an hour; Hancock could sustain a +speed of 10 miles; Ogle had run his coach 32 to 35 miles +an hour, and ascended a hill rising 1 in 6 at the speed of +24<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles. Summers had traveled up a hill having a gradient +of 1 in 12, with 19 passengers, at the rate of speed of +15 miles per hour; he had run 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> hours at 30 miles an hour. +Farey thought that steam-coaches would be found to cost +one-third as much as the stage-coaches in use. The steam-carriages +were reported to be safer than those drawn by +horses, and far more manageable; and the construction of +boilers adopted—the “sectional” boiler, as it is now called—completely +insured against injury by explosion, and the +dangers and inconveniences arising from the frightening of +horses had proved to be largely imaginary. The wear and +tear of roads were found to be less than with horses, while +with broad wheel-tires the carriages acted beneficially as +road-rollers. The committee finally concluded:</p> + +<p>“1. That carriages can be propelled by steam on common +roads at an average rate of 10 miles per hour.</p> + +<p>“2. That at this rate they have conveyed upward of 14 +passengers.</p> + +<p>“3. That their weight, including engine, fuel, water, +and attendants, may be under three tons.</p> + +<p>“4. That they can ascend and descend hills of considerable +inclination with facility and safety.</p> + +<p>“5. That they are perfectly safe for passengers.</p> + +<p>“6. That they are not (or need not be, if properly constructed) +nuisances to the public.</p> + +<p>“7. That they will become a speedier and cheaper mode +of conveyance than carriages drawn by horses.</p> + +<p>“8. That, as they admit of greater breadth of tire than +other carriages, and as the roads are not acted on so injuriously +as by the feet of horses in common draught, such carriages<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">[172]</a></span> +will cause less wear of roads than coaches drawn by +horses.</p> + +<p>“9. That rates of toll have been imposed on steam-carriages, +which would prohibit their being used on several +lines of road, were such charges permitted to remain unaltered.”</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">The Railroad</span>, which now, by the adaptation of steam +to the propulsion of its carriages, became the successful +rival of the system of transportation of which an account +has just been given, was not a new device. It, like all +other important changes of method and great inventions, +had been growing into form for ages. The ancients were +accustomed to lay down blocks of stone as a way upon +which their heavily-loaded wagons could be drawn with less +resistance than on the common road. This practice was +gradually so modified as to result in the adoption of the +now universally-practised methods of paving and road-making. +The old tracks, bearing the marks of heavy traffic, are +still seen in the streets of the unearthed city of Pompeii.</p> + +<p>In the early days of mining in Great Britain, the coal +or the ore was carried from the mine to the vessel in which +it was to be embarked in sacks on the backs of horses. +Later, the miners laid out wagon-roads, and used carts and +wagons drawn by horses, and the roads were paved with +stone along the lines traversed by the wheels of the vehicles. +Still later (about 1630), heavy planks or squared timber +took the place of the stone, and were introduced into +the north of England by a gentleman of the name of Beaumont, +who had transferred his property there from the +south. A half century later, the system had become generally +introduced. By the end of the eighteenth century the +construction of these “tram-ways” had become well-understood, +and the economy which justified the expenditure of +considerable amounts of money in making cuts and in filling, +to bring the road to a uniform grade, had become well-recognized. +Arthur Young, writing at this time, says the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">[173]</a></span> +coal wagon-roads were “great works, carried over all sorts +of inequalities of ground, so far as the distance of nine or +ten miles,” and that, on these tram-ways of timber, “one +horse is able to draw, and that with ease, fifty or sixty +bushels of coals.” The wagon-wheels were of cast-iron, and +made with grooved rims, which fitted the rounded tops of +the wooden rails. But these wooden rails were found subject +to rapid decay, and at Whitehaven, in 1738, they were +protected from wear by cast-iron plates laid upon them, and +this improvement rapidly became known and adopted. A +tram-road, laid down at Sheffield for the Duke of Norfolk, +in 1776, was made by laying angle-bars of cast-iron on longitudinal +sleepers of timber; another, built by William +Jessup in Leicestershire, in 1789, had an edge-rail, and the +wheels were made with flanges, like those used to-day. The +coned “tread” of the wheel, which prevents wear of flanges +and reduces resistance, was the invention of James Wright, +of Columbia, Pa., 40 years later. The modern railroad was +simply the result of this gradual improvement of the permanent +way, and the adaptation of the steam-engine to the +propulsion of its wagons.</p> + +<p>At the beginning of the nineteenth century, therefore, +the steam-engine had been given a form which permitted +its use, and the railroad had been so far perfected that there +were no difficulties to be anticipated in the construction of +the permanent way, and inventors were gradually preparing, +as has been seen, to combine these two principal elements +into one system. Railroads had been introduced in +all parts of Great Britain, some of them of considerable +length, and involving the interests of so many private individuals +that they were necessarily constructed under the +authorization of legal enactments. In the year 1805 the +Merstham Railway was opened to traffic, and it is stated +that on that occasion one horse drew a train of 12 wagons, +carrying 38 tons of stone, on a “down gradient” of 1 in 120, +at the rate of 6 miles per hour.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port7" id="Port7"></a> +<img src="images/illo201.png" alt="Trevithick" width="350" height="417" /> +<p class="caption">Richard Trevithick.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">[174]</a></span><span class="smcap"><a href="#Port7">Richard +Trevithick</a></span> was the first engineer to apply +steam-power to the haulage of loads on the railroad. Trevithick +was a Cornishman by birth, a native of Redruth. +He was naturally a skillful mechanic, and was placed by his +father with Watt’s assistant, Murdoch, who was superintending +the erection of pumping-engines in Cornwall; and +from that ingenious and accomplished engineer young Trevithick +probably acquired both the skill and the knowledge +which, with his native talent, enterprise, and industry, enabled +him to accomplish the work which has made him famous. +He was soon intrusted with the erection and management +of large pumping-engines, and subsequently went into the +business of constructing steam-engines with another engineer, +Edward Bull, who took an active part, with the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">[175]</a></span> +Hornblowers and others, in opposing the Boulton & Watt +patents. The termination of the suits which established the +validity of Watt’s patent put an end to their business, and +Trevithick looked about for other work, and, not long +after, entered into partnership with a relative, Andrew +Vivian, who was also a skillful mechanic; they together designed +and patented the steam-carriage already referred to. +Its success was sufficiently satisfactory to awaken strong +confidence of a perfect success on the now common tram-roads; +and Trevithick, in February, 1804, had completed a +“locomotive” engine to work on the Welsh Pen-y-darran +road. This engine (<a href="#Fig50">Fig. 50</a>) had a cylindrical flue-boiler, +<i>A</i>, like that designed by Oliver Evans, and a single steam-cylinder, +<i>B</i>, set vertically into the steam-space of the boiler,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">[176]</a></span> +and driving the outside cranks, <i>L</i>, on the rear axle of the +engine by very long connecting-rods, <i>D</i>, attached to its +cross-head at <i>E</i>. The guide-bars, <i>I</i>, were stayed by braces +leading to the opposite end of the boiler. No attempt +was made to condense the exhaust-steam, which was discharged +into the smoke-pipe. The pressure of steam +adopted was 40 pounds per square inch; but Trevithick +had already made a number of non-condensing engines on +which he carried from 50 to 145 pounds pressure.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig50" id="Fig50"></a> +<img src="images/illo202.png" alt="Trevithick's Locomotive" width="400" height="403" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 50.</span>—Trevithick’s Locomotive, 1804.</p></div> + +<p>In the year 1808, Trevithick built a railroad in London, +on what was known later as Torrington Square, or Euston +Square, and set at work a steam-carriage, which he called +“Catch-me-who-can.” This was a very plain and simple +machine. The steam-cylinder was set vertically in the +after-end of the boiler, and the cross-head was connected to +two rods, one on either side, driving the hind pair of wheels. +The exhaust-steam entered the chimney, aiding the draught. +This engine, weighing about 10 tons, made from 12 to 15 +miles an hour on the circular railway in London, and was +said by its builder to be capable of making 20 miles an hour. +The engine was finally thrown from the track, after some +weeks of work, by the breaking of a rail, and, Trevithick’s +funds having been expended, it was never replaced. This +engine had a steam-cylinder 14<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter, and a +stroke of piston of 4 feet. Trevithick used no device to aid +the friction of the wheels on the rails in giving pulling-power, +and seems to have understood that none was needed. +This plan of working a locomotive-engine without such +complications as had been proposed by other engineers was, +however, subsequently patented, in 1813, by Blackett & +Hedley. The latter was at one time Trevithick’s agent, +and was director of Wylam Colliery, of which Mr. Blackett +was proprietor.</p> + +<p>Trevithick applied his high-pressure non-conducting engine +not only to locomotives, but to every purpose that opportunity +offered him. He put one into the Tredegar Iron-Works,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">[177]</a></span> +to drive the puddle-train, in 1801. This engine had +a steam-cylinder 28 inches in diameter, and 6 feet stroke of +piston; a boiler of cast-iron, 6<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> feet in diameter and 20 feet +long, with a wrought-iron internal tube, 3 feet in diameter +at the furnace-end and 24 inches beyond the furnace. The +steam-pressure ranged from 50 to 100 pounds per square +inch. The valve was a four-way cock. The exhaust-steam +was carried into the chimney, passing through a feed-water +heater <i>en route</i>. This engine was taken down in 1856.<a name="FNanchor_48_48" +id="FNanchor_48_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_48" class="fnanchor">[48]</a></p> + +<p>In 1803, Trevithick applied his engine to driving rock-drills, +and three years later made a large contract with the +Trinity Board for dredging in the Thames, and constructed +steam dredging-machines for the work, of the form which +is still most generally used in Great Britain, although rarely +seen in the United States—the “chain-and-bucket dredger.”</p> + +<p>A little later, Trevithick was engaged upon the first and +unsuccessful attempt to carry a tunnel under the Thames, at +London; but no sooner had that costly scheme been given +up, than he returned to his favorite pursuits, and continued +his work on interrupted schemes for ship-propulsion. Trevithick +at last left England, spent some years in South America, +and finally returned home and died in extreme poverty, +April, 1833, at the age of sixty-two, without having +succeeded in accomplishing the general introduction of any +of his inventions.</p> + +<p>Trevithick was characteristically an inventor of the typical +sort. He invented many valuable devices, but brought +but few into even experimental use, and reaped little advantage +from any of them. He was ingenious, a thorough mechanic, +bold, active, and indefatigable; but his lack of persistence +made his whole life, as Smiles has said, “but a +series of beginnings.”</p> + +<p>It is at about this period that we find evidence of the +intelligent labors of another of our own countrymen—one<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">[178]</a></span> +who, in consequence of the unobtrusive manner in which +his work was done, has never received the full credit to +which he is entitled.</p> + +<div class="center"><a name="Port8" id="Port8"></a> +<img src="images/illo205.png" alt="Colonel Stevens" width="350" height="413" /> +<p class="caption">Colonel John Stevens.</p></div> + +<p><a name="Stevens" id="Stevens"></a><span class="smcap">Colonel John Stevens</span>, of Hoboken, as he is generally +called, was born in the city of New York, in 1749; but +throughout his business-life he was a resident of New Jersey.</p> + +<p>His attention is said to have been first called to the application +of steam-power by seeing the experiments of John +Fitch with his steamer on the Delaware, and he at once devoted +himself to the introduction of steam-navigation with +characteristic energy, and with a success that will be indicated +when we come to the consideration of that subject.</p> + +<p>But this far-sighted engineer and statesman saw plainly<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">[179]</a></span> +the importance of applying the steam-engine to land-transportation +as well as to navigation; and not only that, but +he saw with equal distinctness the importance of a well-devised +and carefully-prosecuted scheme of internal communication +by a complete system of railroads. In 1812 he +published a pamphlet containing “Documents tending to +prove the superior advantages of Railways and Steam-Carriages +over Canal-Navigation.”<a name="FNanchor_49_49" id="FNanchor_49_49"></a><a +href="#Footnote_49_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> At this time, the only +locomotive in the world was that of Trevithick and Vivian, +at Merthyr Tydvil, and the railroad itself had not grown +beyond the old wooden tram-roads of the collieries. Yet +Colonel Stevens says, in this paper: “I can see nothing to +hinder a steam-carriage moving on its ways with a velocity +of 100 miles an hour;” adding, in a foot-note: “This astonishing +velocity is considered here merely possible. It is +probable that it may not, in practise, be convenient to exceed +20 or 30 miles per hour. Actual experiment can only +determine this matter, and I should not be surprised at +seeing steam-carriages propelled at the rate of 40 or 50 +miles an hour.” +</p> + +<p>At a yet earlier date he had addressed a memoir to the +proper authorities, urging his plans for railroads. He +proposed rails of timber, protected, when necessary, by +iron plates, or to be made wholly of iron; the car-wheels +were to be of cast-iron, with inside flanges to keep them on +the track. The steam-engine was to be driven by steam of +50 pounds pressure and upward, and to be non-condensing.</p> + +<p>Answering the objections of Robert R. Livingston and +of the State Commissioners of New York, he goes further into +details. He gives 500 to 1,000 pounds as the maximum +weight to be placed on each wheel; shows that the trains, or +“suits of carriages,” as he calls them, will make their journeys +with as much certainty and celerity in the darkest night +as in the light of day; shows that the grades of proposed<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">[180]</a></span> +roads would offer but little resistance; and places the whole +subject before the public with such accuracy of statement +and such evident appreciation of its true value, that every +one who reads this remarkable document will agree fully +with President Charles King, who said<a name="FNanchor_50_50" id="FNanchor_50_50"></a><a +href="#Footnote_50_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> that “whosoever +shall attentively read this pamphlet, will perceive that the +political, financial, commercial, and military aspects of this +great question were all present to Colonel Stevens’s mind, +and that he felt that he was fulfilling a patriotic duty when +he placed at the disposal of his native country these fruits +of his genius. The offering was not then accepted. The +‘Thinker’ was ahead of his age; but it is grateful to know +that he lived to see his projects carried out, though not by +the Government, and that, before he finally, in 1838, closed +his eyes in death, at the great age of eighty-nine, he could +justly feel assured that the name of Stevens, in his own +person and in that of his sons, was imperishably enrolled +among those which a grateful country will cherish.”</p> + +<p>Without having made any one superlatively great improvement +in the mechanism of the steam-engine, like that +which gave Watt his fame—without having the honor even +of being the first to propose the propulsion of vessels by the +modern steam-engine, or steam-transportation on land—he +exhibited a far better knowledge of the science and the art +of engineering than any man of his time; and he entertained +and urged more advanced opinions and more statesmanlike +views in relation to the economical importance of +the improvement and the application of the steam-engine, +both on land and water, than seem to be attributable to +any other leading engineer of that time.</p> + +<p>Says Dr. King: “Who can estimate if, at that day, acting +upon the well-considered suggestion of President Madison, +‘of the signal advantages to be derived to the United +States from a general system of internal communication and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">[181]</a></span> +conveyance,’ Congress had entertained Colonel Stevens’s +proposal, and, after verifying by actual experiment upon a +small scale the accuracy of his plan, had organized such a +‘general system of internal communication and conveyance;’ +who can begin to estimate the inappreciable benefits +that would have resulted therefrom to the comfort, the +wealth, the power, and, above all, to the absolutely impregnable +union of our great Republic and all its component +parts? All this Colonel Stevens embraced in his views, +for he was a statesman as well as an experimental philosopher; +and whoever shall attentively read his pamphlet, will +perceive that the political, financial, commercial, and military +aspects of this great question were all present to his +mind, and he felt that he was fulfilling a patriotic duty +when he placed at the disposal of his native country these +fruits of his genius.”</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">William Hedley</span>, who has already been referred to, +seems to have been the first to show, by carefully-conducted +experiment, how far the adhesion of the wheels of the locomotive-engine +could be relied upon for hauling-power in +the transportation of loads.</p> + +<p>His employer, Blackett, had applied to Trevithick for a +locomotive-engine to haul coal-trains at the Wylam collieries; +but Trevithick was unable, or was disinclined, to build +him one, and in October, 1812, Hedley was authorized to +attempt the construction of an engine. It was at about +this time that Blenkinsop (1811) was trying the toothed rail +or rack, the Messrs. Chapman (December, 1812) were experimenting +with a towing-chain, and (May, 1813) Brunton +with movable legs.</p> + +<p>Hedley, who had known of the success met with in the +experiments of Trevithick with smooth wheels hauling loads +of considerable weight, in Cornwall, was confident that equal +success might be expected in the north-country, and built +a carriage to be moved by men stationed at four handles, +by which its wheels were turned.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">[182]</a></span>This carriage was loaded with heavy masses of iron, and +attached to trains of coal-wagons on the railway. By repeated +experiment, varying the weight of the traction-carriage +and the load hauled, Hedley ascertained the proportion +of the weight required for adhesion to that of the loads +drawn. It was thus conclusively proven that the weight of +his proposed locomotive-engine would be sufficient to give +the pulling-power necessary for the propulsion of the coal-trains +which it was to haul.</p> + +<p>When the wheels slipped in consequence of the presence +of grease, frost, or moisture on the rail, Hedley proposed to +sprinkle ashes on the track, as sand is now distributed from +the sand-box of the modern engine. This was in October, +1812.</p> + +<p>Hedley now went to work building an engine with +smooth wheels, and patented his design March 13, 1813, a +month after he had put his engine at work. The locomotive +had a cast-iron boiler, and a single steam-cylinder 6 +inches in diameter, with a small fly-wheel. This engine +had too small a boiler, and he soon after built a larger engine, +with a return-flue boiler made of wrought-iron. This +hauled 8 loaded coal-wagons 5 miles an hour at first, and a +little later 10, doing the work of 10 horses. The steam-pressure +was carried at about 50 pounds, and the exhaust, +led into the chimney, where the pipe was turned upward, +thus secured a blast of considerable intensity in its small +chimney. Hedley also contracted the opening of the exhaust-pipe +to intensify the blast, and was subjected to some +annoyance by proprietors of lands along his railway, who +were irritated by the burning of their grass and hedges, +which were set on fire by the sparks thrown out of the +chimney of the locomotive. The cost of Hedley’s experiment +was defrayed by Mr. Blackett.</p> + +<p>Subsequently, Hedley mounted his engine on eight +wheels, the four-wheeled engines having been frequently +stopped by breaking the light rails then in use. Hedley’s<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">[183]</a></span> +engines continued in use at the Wylam collieries many +years. The second engine was removed in 1862, and is now +preserved at the South Kensington Museum, London.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port9" id="Port9"></a> +<img src="images/illo210.png" alt="Stephenson" width="350" height="413" /> +<p class="caption">George Stephenson.</p></div> + +<p><span class="smcap"><a href="#Port9">George Stephenson</a></span>, to whom is generally accorded +the honor of having first made the locomotive-engine a success, +built his first engine at Killingworth, England, in 1814.</p> + +<p>At this time Stephenson was by no means alone in the +field, for the idea of applying the steam-engine to driving +carriages on common roads and on railroads was beginning, +as has been seen, to attract considerable attention. Stephenson, +however, combined, in a very fortunate degree, +the advantages of great natural inventive talent and an +excellent mechanical training, reminding one strongly of +James Watt. Indeed, Stephenson’s portrait bears some +resemblance to <a href="#Port4">that</a> of the earlier great inventor.</p> + +<p>George Stephenson was born June 9, 1781, at Wylam,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">[184]</a></span> +near Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and was the son of a “north-country +miner.” When still a child, he exhibited great mechanical +talent and unusual love of study. When set at +work about the mines, his attention to duty and his intelligence +obtained for him rapid promotion, until, when but +seventeen years of age, he was made engineer, and took +charge of the pumping-engine at which his father was fireman.</p> + +<p>When a mere child, and employed as a herd-boy, he +amused himself making model engines in clay, and, as he +grew older, never lost an opportunity to learn the construction +and management of machinery. After having been +employed at Newburn and Callerton, where he first became +“engine-man,” he began to study with greater interest than +ever the various steam-engines which were then in use; and +both the Newcomen engine and the Watt pumping-engine +were soon thoroughly understood by him. After having +become a brakeman, he removed to Willington Quay, +where he married, and commenced his wedded life on 18 or +20 shillings per week. It was here that he became an intimate +friend of the distinguished William Fairbairn, who +was then working as an apprentice at the Percy Main +Colliery, near by. The “father of the railroad” and the +future President of the British Association were accustomed, +at times, to “change works,” and were frequently +seen in consultation over their numerous projects. It was +at Willington Quay that his son Robert, who afterward +became a distinguished civil engineer, was born, October +16, 1803.</p> + +<p>In the following year Stephenson removed to Killingworth, +and became brakeman at that colliery; but his +wife soon died, and he gladly accepted an invitation to become +engine-driver at a spinning-mill near Montrose, Scotland. +At the end of a year he returned, on foot, to Killingworth +with his savings (about £28), expended over one-half +of the amount in paying his father’s debts and in making<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">[185]</a></span> +his parents comfortable, and then returned to his old +station as brakeman at the pit.</p> + +<p>Here he made some useful improvements in the arrangement +of the machinery, and spent his spare hours in studying +his engine and planning new machines. He a little +later distinguished himself by altering and repairing an +old Newcomen engine at the High Pit, which had failed +to give satisfaction, making it thoroughly successful after +three days’ work. The engine cleared the pit, at which it +had been vainly laboring a long time, in two days after +Stephenson started it up.</p> + +<p>In the year 1812, Stephenson was made engine-wright of +the Killingworth High Pit, receiving £100 a year, and it was +made his duty to supervise the machinery of all the collieries +under lease by the so-called “Grand Allies.” It was +here, and at this period, that he commenced a systematic +course of self-improvement and the education of his son, +and here he first began to be recognized as an inventor. +He was full of life and something of a wag, and often made +most amusing applications of his inventive powers: as when +he placed the watch, which a comrade had brought him as +out of repairs, in the oven “to cook,” his quick eye having +noted the fact that the difficulty arose simply from the +clogging of the wheels by the oil, which had been congealed +by cold.</p> + +<p>Smiles,<a name="FNanchor_51_51" id="FNanchor_51_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_51" +class="fnanchor">[51]</a> his biographer, describes his cottage as a perfect +curiosity-shop, filled with models of engines, machines of +various kinds, and novel apparatus. He connected the cradles +of his neighbors’ wives with the smoke-jacks in their +chimneys, and thus relieved them from constant attendance +upon their infants; he fished at night with a submarine +lamp, which attracted the fish from all sides, and gave him +wonderful luck; he also found time to give colloquial instruction +to his fellow-workmen.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">[186]</a></span>He built a self-acting inclined plane for his pit, on which +the wagons, descending loaded, drew up the empty trains; +and made so many improvements at the Killingworth pit, +that the number of horses employed underground was reduced +from 100 to 16.</p> + +<p>Stephenson now had more liberty than when employed +at the brakes, and, hearing of the experiments of Blackett +and Hedley at Wylam, went over to their colliery to study +their engine. He also went to Leeds to see the Blenkinsop +engine draw, at a trial, 70 tons at the rate of 3 miles +an hour, and expressed his opinion in the characteristic remark, +“I think I could make a better engine than that to +go upon legs.” He very soon made the attempt.</p> + +<p>Having laid the subject before the proprietors of the +lease under which the collieries were worked, and convinced +Lord Ravensworth, the principal owner, of the advantages +to be secured by the use of a “traveling engine,” that +nobleman advanced the money required. Stephenson at +once commenced his first locomotive-engine, building it in +the workshops at West Moor, assisted mainly by John +Thirlwall, the colliery blacksmith, during the years 1813 +and 1814, completing it in July of the latter year.</p> + +<p>This engine had a wrought-iron boiler 8 feet long and +2 feet 10 inches in diameter, with a single flue 20 inches in +diameter. The cylinders were vertical, 8 inches in diameter +and of 2 feet stroke of piston, set in the boiler, and +driving a set of wheels which geared with each other and +with other cogged wheels on the two driving-axles. A feed-water +heater surrounded the base of the chimney. This +engine drew 30 tons on a rising gradient of 10 or 12 feet to +the mile at the rate of 4 miles an hour. This engine proved +in many respects defective, and the cost of its operation +was found to be about as great as that of employing horse-power.</p> + +<p>Stephenson determined to build another engine on a +somewhat different plan, and patented its design in February,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">[187]</a></span> +1815. It proved a much more efficient machine than +the “Blücher,” the first engine.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig51" id="Fig51"></a> +<img src="images/illo214.png" alt="Stephenson's Locomotive of 1815" width="448" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 51.</span>—Stephenson’s Locomotive of 1815. Section.</p></div> + +<p>This second engine (<a href="#Fig51">Fig. 51</a>) was also fitted with two +vertical cylinders, <i>C c</i>, but the connecting-rods were attached +directly to the four driving-wheels, <i>W W′</i>. To permit +the necessary freedom of motion, “ball-and-socket” +joints were adopted, to unite the rods with the cross-heads, +<i>R r</i>, and with the cranks, <i>R′ Y′</i>; and the two driving-axles +were connected by an endless chain, <i>T t′</i>. The cranked axle +and the outside connection of the wheels, as specified in the +patent, were not used until afterward, it having been found +impossible to get the cranked axles made. In this engine +the forced draught obtained by the impulse of the exhaust-steam +was adopted, doubling the power of the machine and +permitting the use of coke as a fuel, and making it possible +to adopt the multi-tubular boiler. Small steam-cylinders, +<i>S S S</i>, took the weight of the engine and served as springs.</p> + +<p>It was at about this time that George Stephenson and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">[188]</a></span> +Sir Humphry Davy, independently and almost simultaneously, +invented the “safety-lamp,” without which few mines +of bituminous coal could to-day be worked. The former +used small tubes, the latter fine wire gauze, to intercept the +flame. Stephenson proved the efficiency of his lamp by +going with it directly into the inflammable atmosphere of a +dangerous mine, and repeatedly permitting the light to be +extinguished when the lamp became surcharged with the +explosive mixture which had so frequently proved fatal to +the miners. This was in October and November, 1815, and +Stephenson’s work antedates that of the great philosopher.<a name="FNanchor_52_52" +id="FNanchor_52_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52_52" class="fnanchor">[52]</a> +The controversy which arose between the supporters of the +rival claims of the two inventors was very earnest, and +sometimes bitter. The friends of the young engineer raised +a subscription, amounting to above £1,000, and presented it +to him as a token of their appreciation of the value of his +simple yet important contrivance. Of the two forms of +lamp, that of Stephenson is claimed to be safest, the Davy +lamp being liable to produce explosions by igniting the explosive +gas when, by its combustion within the gauze cylinder, +the latter is made red-hot. Under similar conditions, +the Stephenson lamp is simply extinguished, as was seen at +Barnsley, in 1857, at the Oaks Colliery, where both kinds +of lamp were in use, and elsewhere.</p> + +<p>Stephenson continued to study and experiment, with a +view to the improvement of his locomotive and the railroad. +He introduced better methods of track-laying and of +jointing the rails, adopting a half-lap, or peculiar scarf-joint, +in place of the then usual square-butt joint. He patented, +with these modifications of the permanent way, several +of his improvements of the engine. He had substituted +forged for the rude cast wheels previously used,<a name="FNanchor_53_53" id="FNanchor_53_53"></a><a +href="#Footnote_53_53" class="fnanchor">[53]</a> and had<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">[189]</a></span> +made many minor changes of detail. The engines built +at this time (1816) continued in use many years. Two +years later, with a dynamometer which he designed for the +purpose, he made experimental determinations of the resistance +of trains, and showed that it was made up of several +kinds, as the sliding friction of the axle-journals in their +bearings, the rolling friction of the wheels on the rails, the +resistance due to gravity on gradients, and that due to the +resistance of the air.</p> + +<p>These experiments seemed to him conclusive against the +possibility of the competition of engines on the common +highway with locomotives hauling trains on the rail. Finding +that the resistance, with his rolling-stock, and at all the +speeds at which he made his experiments, was approximately +invariable, and equivalent to about 10 pounds per ton, +and estimating that a gradient rising but 1 foot in 100 +would decrease the hauling power of the engine 50 per +cent., he saw at once the necessity of making all railroads +as nearly absolutely level as possible, and, consequently, the +radically distinctive character of this branch of civil engineering +work. He persistently condemned the “folly” of +attempting the general introduction of steam on the common +road, where great changes of level and an impressible +road-bed were certain to prove fatal to success, and was +most strenuous in his advocacy of the policy of securing +level tracks, even at very great expense.</p> + +<p>Taking part in the contest, which now became a serious +one, between the advocates of steam on the common road +and those urging the introduction of locomotives and their +trains on an iron track, he calculated that a road-engine +capable of carrying 20 or 30 passengers at 10 miles per hour, +could, on the rail, carry ten times as many people at three +or four times that speed. The railway-engine finally superseded +its predecessor—the engine of the common road—almost +completely.</p> + +<p>In 1817, Stephenson built an engine for the Duke of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">[190]</a></span> +Portland, to haul coal from Kilmarnock to Troon, which +cost £750, and, with some interruptions, this engine worked +on that line until 1848, when it was broken up. On November +18, 1822, the Hetton Railway, near Sunderland, was +opened. George Stephenson was the engineer of the line—a +short track, 8 miles long, built from the Hetton Colliery to +the docks on the bank of the river Wear. On this line he +put in five of the “self-acting inclines”—two inclines worked +by stationary engines, the gradients being too heavy for +locomotives—and used five locomotive-engines of his own +design, which were called by the people of the neighborhood, +possibly for the first time, “the iron horses.” These +engines were quite similar to the Killingworth engine. +They drew a train of 17 coal-cars—a total load of 64 tons—about +4 miles an hour. Meantime, also, in 1823, Stephenson +had been made engineer of the Stockton & Darlington +Railroad, which had been projected for the purpose +of securing transportation to tide-water for the valuable +coal-lands of Durham. This road was built without an expectation +on the part of any of its promoters, Stephenson +excepted, that steam would be used as a motor to the exclusion +of horses.</p> + +<p>Mr. Edward Pearse, however, one of the largest holders +of stock in the road, and one of its most earnest advocates, +became so convinced, by an examination of the Killingworth +engines and their work, of the immense advantage to +be derived by their use, that he not only supported Stephenson’s +arguments, but, with Thomas Richardson, advanced +£1,000 for the purpose of assisting Stephenson to +commence the business of locomotive-engine construction at +Newcastle. This workshop, which subsequently became a +great and famous establishment, was commenced in 1824.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig52" id="Fig52"></a> +<img src="images/illo218.png" alt="Stephenson's No. 1 Engine" width="400" height="281" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 52.</span>—Stephenson’s No. 1 Engine, 1825.</p></div> + +<p>For this road Stephenson recommended wrought-iron +rails, which were then costing £12 per ton—double the price +of cast rails. The directors, however, stipulated that he +should only buy one-half the rails required from the dealers<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">[191]</a></span> +in “malleable” iron. These rails weighed 20 pounds to the +yard. After long hesitation, in the face of a serious opposition, +the directors finally concluded to order three locomotives +of Stephenson. The first, or “No. 1,” engine (<a href="#Fig52">Fig. 52</a>) +was delivered in time for the opening of the road, September +27, 1825. It weighed 8 tons. Its boiler contained a single +straight flue, one end of which was the furnace. The +cylinders were vertical, like those of the earlier engines, and +coupled directly to the driving-wheels. The crank-pins +were set in the wheels at right angles, in order that, while +one engine was “turning the centre,” the other might exert +its maximum power. The two pairs of drivers were coupled +by horizontal rods, as seen in the figure, which represents +this engine as subsequently mounted on a pedestal at the Darlington +station. A steam-blast in the chimney gave the +requisite strength of draught. These engines were built for +slow and heavy work, but were capable of making what was +then thought the satisfactorily high speed of 16 miles per +hour. The inclines on the road were worked by fixed engines.</p> + +<p>On the <a href="#Fig53">opening day</a>, which was celebrated as a holiday<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">[192]</a></span> +by the people far and near, the No. 1 engine drew 90 tons +at the rate of 12, and at times 15, miles an hour.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig53" id="Fig53"></a> +<img src="images/illo219.png" alt="Opening of Darlington Railroad" width="600" height="282" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 53.</span>—Opening of the Stockton and Darlington +Railroad, 1815.<br />(After an old engraving.)</p></div> + +<p>Stephenson’s engines were kept at work hauling coal-trains,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">[193]</a></span> +but the passenger-coaches were all drawn for some +time by horses, and the latter system was a rude forerunner, +in most respects, of modern street-railway transportation. +Mixed passenger and freight trains were next introduced, +and, soon after, separate passenger-trains drawn by faster +engines were placed on the line, and the present system of +railroad transportation was now fairly inaugurated.</p> + +<p>A railroad between Manchester and Liverpool had been +projected at about the time that the Stockton & Darlington +road was commenced. The preliminary surveys had +been made in the face of strong opposition, which did not +always stop at legal action and verbal attack, but in +some instances led to the display of force. The surveyors +were sometimes driven from their work by a mob armed +with sticks and stones, urged on by land-proprietors and +those interested in the lines of coaches on the highway. +Before the opening of the Stockton & Darlington Railroad, +the Liverpool & Manchester bill had been carried +through Parliament, after a very determined effort on the +part of coach-proprietors and landholders to defeat it, and +Stephenson urged the adoption of the locomotive to the +exclusion of horses. It was his assertion, made at this +time, that he could build a locomotive to run 20 miles an +hour, that provoked the celebrated rejoinder of a writer in +the <i>Quarterly Review</i>, who was, however, in favor of the +construction of the road and of the use of the locomotive +upon it: “What can be more palpably absurd and ridiculous, +than the prospect held out of locomotives traveling +<i>twice as fast</i> as stage-coaches? We would as soon expect +the people of Woolwich to suffer themselves to be fired off +upon one of Congreve’s ricochet-rockets, as trust themselves +to the mercy of such a machine going at such a rate.”</p> + +<p>It was during his examination before a committee of +the House of Commons, during this contest, that Stephenson, +when asked, “Suppose, now, one of your engines to +be going at the rate of 9 or 10 miles an hour, and that a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">[194]</a></span> +cow were to stray upon the line and get in the way of the +engine, would not that be a very awkward circumstance?” +replied, “Yes, <i>very</i> awkward—<i>for the coo!</i>” And when +asked if men and animals would not be frightened by the +red-hot smoke-pipe, answered, “But how would they know +that it was not <i>painted?</i>” The line was finally built, with +George Rennie as consulting, and Stephenson as principal +constructing engineer.</p> + +<p>His work on this road became one of the important +elements of the success, and one of the great causes +of the distinction, which marked the life of these rising +engineers. The successful construction of that part of +the line which lay across “Chat Moss,” an unfathomable +swampy deposit of peat, extending over an area of 12 +square miles, and the building of which had been repeatedly +declared an impossibility, was in itself sufficient to +prove that the engineer who had accomplished it was no +common man. Stephenson adopted the very simple yet +bold expedient of using, as a filling, compacted turf and peat, +and building a road-bed of materials lighter than water, +or the substance composing the bog, and thus forming a +<i>floating</i> embankment, on which he laid his rails. To the +surprise of every one but Stephenson himself, the plan +proved perfectly successful, and even surprisingly economical, +costing but little more than one-tenth the estimate of +at least one engineer. Among the other great works on +this remarkable pioneer-line were the tunnel, a mile and a +half long, from the station at Liverpool to Edgehill; the +Olive Mount deep-cut, two miles long, and in some places +100 feet deep, through red sandstone, of which nearly +500,000 yards were removed; the Sankey Viaduct, a brick +structure of nine arches, of 50 feet span each, costing +£45,000; and a number of other pieces of work which are +noteworthy in even these days of great works.</p> + +<p>Stephenson planned all details of the line, and even designed +the bridges, machinery, engines, turn-tables, switches,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">[195]</a></span> +and crossings, and was responsible for every part of the +work of their construction.</p> + +<p>Finally, the work of building the line approached completion, +and it became necessary promptly to settle the long-deferred +question of a method of applying motive-power. +Some of the directors and their advisers still advocated the +use of horses; many thought stationary hauling-engines +preferable; and the remainder were, almost to a man, undecided. +The locomotive had no outspoken advocate, and +few had the slightest faith in it. George Stephenson was +almost alone, and the opponents of steam had secured a +provision in the Newcastle & Carlisle Railroad concession, +stipulating expressly that horses should there be exclusively +employed. The directors did, however, in 1828, permit +Stephenson to put on the line a locomotive, to be used, during +its construction, in hauling gravel-trains. A committee +was sent, at Stephenson’s request, to see the Stockton & +Darlington engines, but no decided expression of opinion +seems to have been made by them. Two well-known professional +engineers reported in favor of fixed engines, and +advised the division of the line into 19 stages of about a +mile and a half each, and the use of 21 fixed engines, although +they admitted the excessive first-cost of that system. +The board was naturally strongly inclined to adopt their +plan. Stephenson, however, earnestly and persistently opposed +such action, and, after long debate, it was finally determined +“to give the traveling engine a chance.” The +board decided to offer a reward of £500 for the best locomotive-engine, +and prescribed the following conditions:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>1. The engine must consume its own smoke.</p> + +<p>2. The engine, if of 6 tons weight, must be able to draw after it, day +by day, 20 tons weight (including the tender and water-tank) at 10 miles an +hour, with a pressure of steam on the boiler not exceeding 50 pounds to the +square inch.</p> + +<p>3. The boiler must have two safety-valves, neither of which must be fastened +down, and one of them completely out of the control of the engine-man.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum' style="font-size: 1em;"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">[196]</a></span>4. +The engine and boiler must be supported on springs, and rest on 6 +wheels, the height of the whole not exceeding 15 feet to the top of the +chimney.</p> + +<p>5. The engine, with water, must not weigh more than 6 tons; but an +engine of less weight would be preferred, on its drawing a proportionate +load behind it; if of only 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons, then it might be put only on 4 wheels. +The company to be at liberty to test the boiler, etc., by a pressure of 150 +pounds to the square inch.</p> + +<p>6. A mercurial gauge must be affixed to the machine, showing the +steam-pressure above 45 pounds to the square inch.</p> + +<p>7. The engine must be delivered, complete and ready for trial, at the +Liverpool end of the railway, not later than the 1st of October, 1829.</p> + +<p>8. The price of the engine must not exceed £550.</p></div> + +<p>This circular was printed and published throughout the +kingdom, and a considerable number of engines were constructed +to compete at the trial, which was proposed to +take place October 1, 1829, but which was deferred to the +6th of that month. Only four engines, however, were finally +entered on the day of the trial. These were the “Novelty,” +constructed by Messrs. Braithwaite & Ericsson, the +latter being the distinguished engineer who subsequently +came to the United States to introduce screw-propulsion, +and, later, the monitor system of iron-clads; the “Rocket,” +built from Stephenson’s plans; and the “Sanspareil” and +the “Perseverance,” built by Hackworth and Burstall, respectively.</p> + +<p>The “Sanspareil,” which was built under the direction +of Timothy Hackworth, one of Stephenson’s earlier foremen, +resembled the engine built by the latter for the Stockton +& Darlington road, but was heavier than had been stipulated, +was not ready for work when called, and, when finally +set at work, proved to be very extravagant in its use of +fuel, partly in consequence of the extreme intensity of its +blast, which caused the expulsion of unconsumed coals from +the furnace.</p> + +<p>The “Perseverance” could not attain the specified speed, +and was withdrawn.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig54" id="Fig54"></a> +<img src="images/illo224.png" alt="The 'Novelty'" width="450" height="278" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 54.</span>—The “Novelty,” 1829.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">[197]</a></span>The “Novelty” was apparently a well-designed and for +that time a remarkably well-proportioned machine. <i>A</i>, in +<a href="#Fig54">Fig. 54</a>, is the boiler, <i>D</i> the steam-cylinders, <i>E</i> a heater. +Its weight but slightly exceeded three tons, and it was a +“tank engine,” carrying its own fuel and water at <i>B</i>. A +forced draught was obtained by means of the bellows, <i>C</i>. +This engine was run over the line at the rate of about 28 +miles an hour at times, but its blowing apparatus failed, +and the “Rocket” held the track alone. A later trial still +left the “Rocket” alone in the field.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig55" id="Fig55"></a> +<img src="images/illo225.png" alt="The 'Rocket'" width="350" height="283" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 55.</span>—The “Rocket,” 1829.</p></div> + +<p>The “Rocket” (<a href="#Fig55">Fig. 55</a>) was built at the works of Robert +Stephenson & Co., at Newcastle-upon-Tyne. The boiler was +given considerable heating-surface by the introduction of +25 3-inch copper tubes, at the suggestion of Henry Booth, +secretary of the railroad company. The blast was altered +by gradually closing in the opening at the extremity of the +exhaust-pipe, and thus “sharpening” it until it was found +to have the requisite intensity. The effect of this modification +of the shape of the pipe was observed carefully by +means of syphon water-gauges attached to the chimney. +The draft was finally given such an intensity as to raise the +water 3 inches in the tube of the draught-gauge. The<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">[198]</a></span> +total length of the boiler was 6 feet, its diameter 40 inches. +The fire-box was attached to the rear of the boiler, and was +3 feet high and 2 feet wide, with water-legs to protect its +side-sheets from injury by overheating. The cylinders, as +seen in the sketch, were inclined, and coupled to a single +pair of driving-wheels. A tender, attached to the engine, +carried the fuel and water. The engine weighed less than +4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons.</p> + +<p>The little engine does not seem to have been very prepossessing +in appearance, and the “Novelty” is said to have +been the general favorite, the Stephenson engine having +few, if any, backers among the spectators. On its first +trial, it ran 12 miles in less than an hour.</p> + +<p>After the accident which disabled the “Novelty,” the +“Rocket” came forward again, and ran at the rate of from +25 to 30 miles an hour, drawing a single carriage carrying 30 +passengers. Two days later, on the 8th of October, steam +was raised in a little less than an hour from cold water, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">[199]</a></span> +it then, with 13 tons of freight in the train, ran 35 miles in +1 hour and 48 minutes, including stops, and attained a speed +of 29 miles an hour. The average of all runs for the trial +was 15 miles an hour.</p> + +<p>This success, far exceeding the expectation of the most +sanguine of the advocates of the system, and greatly exceeding +what had been asserted by opponents to be the +bounds of possibility, settled completely the whole question, +and the Manchester & Liverpool road was at once +equipped with locomotive engines.</p> + +<p>The “Rocket” remained on the line until 1837, when it +was sold, and set at work by the purchasers on the Midgeholme +Railway, near Carlisle. On one occasion, on this +road, it was driven 4 miles in 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> minutes. It is now in the +Patent Museum at South Kensington, London.</p> + +<p>In January, 1830, a single line of rails had been carried +across Chat Moss, and, six months later, the first train, +drawn by the “Arrow,” ran through, June 14th, from Liverpool +to Manchester, making the trip in an hour and a +half, and attaining a maximum speed of over 27 miles an +hour. The line was formally opened to traffic September +15, 1830.</p> + +<p>This was one of the most notable occasions in the history +of the railroad, and the successful termination of the +great work was celebrated, as so important an event should +be, by impressive ceremonies. Among the distinguished +spectators were Sir Robert Peel and the Duke of Wellington. +Mr. Huskisson, a Member of Parliament for Liverpool, +was also present. There had been built for the line, by Robert +Stephenson & Co., 7 locomotives besides the “Rocket,” +and a large number of carriages. These were all brought +out in procession, and 600 passengers entered the train, +which started for Manchester, and ran at times, on smooth +portions of the road, at the rate of 20 and 25 miles an hour. +Crowds of people along the line cheered at this strange +and to them incomprehensible spectacle, and the story of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">[200]</a></span> +the wonderful performances of that day on the new railroad +was repeated in every corner of the land. A sad accident, +the precursor of thousands to follow the introduction of the +new method of transportation, while it repressed the rising +enthusiasm of the people and dampened the ardor of the +most earnest of the advocates of the railroad, occurring +during this trip, assisted in making known the power of the +new motor and the danger attending its use as well. The +trains stopped for water at Parkside, and occasion was +taken to send the “Northumbrian,” an engine driven by +George Stephenson himself, on a side track, with the carriage +containing the Duke of Wellington, and the other +engines and trains were all directed to be sent along the +main track in view of the Duke and his party. While this +movement was in process of execution, Mr. Huskisson, who +had carelessly stood on the main line until the “Rocket,” +which led the column, had nearly reached him, attempted +to enter the carriage of the Duke. He was too late, and +was struck by the “Rocket,” thrown down across the rail, +and the advancing engine crushed a leg so seriously that he +died the same evening. Immediately after the accident, he +was placed on the “Northumbrian,” and Stephenson made +the 15 miles to the destination of the wounded man in 25 +minutes—a speed of 36 miles an hour. The news of this accident, +and the statement of the velocity of the engine, were +published throughout the kingdom and Europe; and the +misfortune of this first victim of a railroad accident was one +of the causes of the immediate adoption and rapid spread +of the modern railway system.</p> + +<p>This road, which was built in the hope of securing 400 +passengers per day, almost immediately averaged 1,200, and +in five years reported 500,000 passengers for the year.<a name="FNanchor_54_54" id="FNanchor_54_54"></a><a +href="#Footnote_54_54" class="fnanchor">[54]</a> The +success of this road insured the general introduction of +railroads, and from this time forward there was never a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">[201]</a></span> +doubt of their ultimate adoption to the exclusion of every +other system of general internal communication and transportation.</p> + +<p>For some years after this his first great triumph, George +Stephenson gave his whole time to the building of railroads +and the improvement of the engine. He was assisted by +his son Robert, to whom he gradually surrendered his business, +and retired to Tapton House, on the Midland Railway, +and led a busy but pleasant life during the remaining years +of his existence.</p> + +<p>Even as early as 1840, he seems to have projected many +improvements which were only generally adopted many +years later. He proposed self-acting and continuous systems +of brake, and considered a good system of brake of so +great importance, that he advocated their compulsory introduction +by State legislation. He advised moderate speeds, +from considerations both of safety and of expense.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig56" id="Fig56"></a> +<img src="images/illo229.png" alt="Atmospheric Railroad" width="332" height="400" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 56.</span>—The Atmospheric Railroad.</p></div> + +<p>A few years after the opening of the Liverpool & +Manchester road, great numbers of schemes were proposed +by ignorant or designing men, which had for their object +the filling of the pockets of their proposers rather than the +benefit of the stockholders and the public; and the Stephensons +were often called upon to combat these crude and +ill-digested plans. Among these was the pneumatic system +of propulsion, already referred to as first proposed by Papin, +in combination with his double-acting air-pump, in 1687. +It had been again proposed in the early part of the present +century by Medhurst, who proposed a method of pneumatic +transmission of small parcels and of letters, which is now +in use, and, 15 years later, a railroad to take the place of +that of Stephenson and his coadjutors. The most successful +of several attempts to introduce this method was that +of Clegg & Samuda, at West London, and on the London +& Croydon road, and again in Ireland, between Kingstown +and Dalkey. A line of pipe, <i>B B</i>, seen in <a href="#Fig56">Fig. 56</a>, +two feet in diameter, was laid between the rails, <i>A A</i>, of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">[202]</a></span> +the road. This pipe was fitted with a nicely-packed piston, +carrying a strong arm, which rose through a slit made along +the top of the pipe, and covered by a flexible strip of +leather, <i>E E</i>. This arm was attached to the carriage, <i>C C</i>, +to be propelled. The pressure of the atmosphere being removed, +by the action of a powerful pump, from the side +toward which the train was to advance, the pressure of the +atmosphere on the opposite side drove the piston forward, +carrying the train with it. Stephenson was convinced, +after examining the plans of the projectors, that the scheme +would fail, and so expressed himself. Those who favored +it, however, had sufficient influence with capitalists to secure +repeated trials, although each was followed by failure, and +it was several years before the last was heard of this system.</p> + +<p>A considerable portion of several of the later years of +Stephenson’s life was spent in traveling in Europe, partly +on business and partly for pleasure. During a visit to Belgium +in 1845, he was received everywhere, and by all<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">[203]</a></span> +classes, from the king down to the humblest of his subjects, +with such distinction as is rarely accorded even to the +greatest men. He soon after visited Spain with Sir Joshua +Walmsley, to report on a proposed railway from the capital +to the Bay of Biscay. On this journey he was taken ill, +and his health was permanently impaired. Thenceforward +he devoted himself principally to the direction of his own +property, which had become very considerable, and spent +much of his time at the collieries and other works in which +he had invested it. His son had now entirely relieved him +of all business connected with railroads, and he had leisure +to devote to self-improvement and social amusement. Among +his friends he claimed Sir Robert Peel, his old acquaintance, +now Sir William, Fairbairn, Dr. Buckland, and many others +of the distinguished men of that time.</p> + +<p>In August, 1848, Stephenson was attacked with intermittent +fever, succeeded by hæmorrhage from the lungs, and +died on the 12th of that month, at the age of sixty-six +years, honored of all men, and secure of an undying fame. +Soon after his death, statues were erected at Liverpool, +London, and Newcastle, the cost of the second of which +was defrayed by private subscriptions, including a contribution +of about $1,500 by 3,150 workingmen—one of the +finest tributes ever offered to the memory of a great man.</p> + +<p>But the noblest monument is that which he himself +erected by the establishment of a system of education and +protection of his working-people at Clay Cross. He made it +a condition of employment that every employé should contribute +from five to twelve pence each fortnight to a fund, +to which the works also made liberal contributions. From +that fund it was directed that the expenses of free education +of the children of the work-people, night-schools for those +employed in the works, a reading-room and library, medical +treatment, and a benevolent fund were to be defrayed. +Music and cricket-clubs, and prize funds for the best garden, +were also founded. The school, public hall, and the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">[204]</a></span> +church of Clay Cross, and this noble system of support, are +together a nobler monument than any statue or similar +structure could be.</p> + +<p>The character of George Stephenson was in every way +admirable. Simple, earnest, and honorable; courageous, +indomitable, and industrious; humorous, kind, and philanthropic, +his memory will long be cherished, and will long +prove an incentive to earnest effort and to the pursuit of an +honorable fame with hundreds of the youth who, reading +his simple yet absorbing story, as told by his biographer, +shall in later years learn to know him.</p> + +<p>After the death of his father, Robert Stephenson continued, +as he had already done for several years, to conduct +the business of building locomotives, as well as of constructing +railroads. The work of locomotive engine-building was +done at Newcastle, and for many years those works were +the principal engine-building establishment of the world.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig57" id="Fig57"></a> +<img src="images/illo231.png" alt="Stephenson's Locomotive" width="406" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 57.</span>—Stephenson’s Locomotive, 1833.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">[205]</a></span>After their introduction on the Liverpool & Manchester +road, the engines of the firm of Robert Stephenson & +Co. were rapidly modified, until they assumed the form +shown in <a href="#Fig57">Fig. 57</a>, which remained standard until their +gradual increase in weight compelled the builders to place +a larger number of wheels beneath them, and make those +other changes which finally resulted in the creation of distinct +types for special kinds of work. In the engine of +1833, as shown above, the cylinders, <i>A</i>, are carried at the +extreme forward end of the boiler, and the driving-wheels, +<i>B</i>, are coupled directly to the connecting-rod of the engine +and to each other. A buffer, <i>C</i>, extends in front, and the +rear end of the boiler is formed into a rectangular fire-box, +<i>D</i>, continuous with the shell, <i>E</i>, and the flame and gases +pass to the connection and smoke-pipe, <i>F</i>, <i>G</i>, through a +large number of small tubes, <i>a</i>. Steam is led to the cylinders +by a steam-pipe, <i>H H</i>, to which it is admitted by the +throttle-valve, <i>b</i>. A steam-dome, <i>I</i>, from which the steam +is taken, assists by giving more steam-space far above the +water-line, and thus furnishing dry steam. The exhaust +steam issues with great velocity into the chimney from the +pipe, <i>J</i>, giving great intensity of draught. The engine-driver +stands on the platform, <i>K</i>, from which all the valves +and handles are accessible. Feed-pumps, <i>L</i>, supply the +boiler with water, which is drawn from the tender through +the pipes, <i>e</i>, <i>f</i>.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig58" id="Fig58"></a> +<img src="images/illo233.png" alt="Stephenson Valve Gear" width="600" height="251" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 58.</span>—The Stephenson Valve-Gear, 1833.</p></div> + +<p>The valve-gear was then substantially what it is to-day, +the “Stephenson link” (<a href="#Fig58">Fig. 58</a>). On the driving-axle were +keyed two eccentrics, <i>E</i>, so set that the motion of the one +was adapted to driving the valve when the engine was moving +forward, and the other was arranged to move the valve +when running backward. The former was connected, +through its strap and the rod, <i>B</i>, to the upper end of a +“strap-link,” <i>A</i>, while the second was similarly connected +with the lower end. By means of a handle, <i>L</i>, and the link, +<i>n</i>, and its connections, including the counterweighted +bell-crank,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">[206]</a></span> +<i>M</i>, this link could be raised or depressed, thus +bringing the pin on the link-block, to which the valve-stem +was connected, into action with either eccentric. Or, +the link being set in mid-gear, the valve would cover both +steam-ports of the cylinder, and the engine could move +neither way. As shown, the engine is in position to run +backward. A series of notches, <i>Z</i>, into either of which a +catch on <i>L</i> could be dropped, enabled the driver to place +the link where he chose. In intermediate positions, between +mid-gear and full-gear, the motion of the valve is +such as to produce expansion of the steam, and some gain +in economy of working, although reducing the power of the +engine.</p> + +<p>The success of the railroad and the locomotive in Great +Britain led to its rapid introduction in other countries. In +France, as early as 1823, M. Beaunier was authorized to +construct a line of rails from the coal-mines of St. Étienne +to the Loire, using horses for the traction of his trains; and +in 1826, MM. Seguin began a road from St. Étienne to +Lyons. In 1832, engines built at Lyons were substituted +for horses on these roads, but internal agitations interrupted +the progress of the new system in France, and, for 10 years +after the opening of the Manchester & Liverpool road, +France remained without steam-transportation on land.</p> + +<p>In Belgium the introduction of the locomotive was more<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">[207]</a></span> +promptly accomplished. Under the direction of Pierre +Simon, an enterprising and well-informed young engineer, +who had become known principally as an advocate of the +even then familiar project of a canal across the Isthmus of +Darien, very complete plans of railroad communication for +the kingdom were prepared, in compliance with a decree +dated July 31, 1834, and were promptly authorized. The +road between Brussels and Mechlin was opened May 6, +1837, and other roads were soon built; and the railway system +of Belgium was the first on the Continent of Europe.</p> + +<p>The first German railroad worked with locomotive steam-engines +was that between Nuremberg and Fürth, built under +the direction of M. Denis. The other European countries +soon followed in this rapid march of improvement.</p> + +<p>In the United States, public attention had been directed +to this subject, as has already been stated, very early in the +present century, by Evans and Stevens. At that time the +people of the United States, as was natural, closely watched +every important series of events in the mother-country; +and so remarkable and striking a change as that which was +taking place in the time of Stephenson, in methods of communication +and transportation, could not fail to attract +general attention and awaken universal interest.</p> + +<p>Notwithstanding the success of the early experiments of +Evans and others, and in spite of the statesmanlike arguments +of Stevens and Dearborn, and the earnest advocacy +of the plan by all who were familiar with the revelations +which were daily made of the power and capabilities of the +steam-engine, it was not until after the opening of the Manchester +& Liverpool road that any action was taken looking +to the introduction of the locomotive. Colonel John +Stevens, in 1825, had built a small locomotive, which he +had placed on a circular railway before his house—now +Hudson Terrace—at Hoboken, to prove that his statements +had a basis of fact. This engine had two “lantern” tubular +boilers, each composed of small iron tubes, arranged<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">[208]</a></span> +vertically in circles about the furnaces.<a name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></a><a +href="#Footnote_55_55" class="fnanchor">[55]</a> This exhibition +had no other effect, however, than to create some interest +in the subject, which aided in securing a rapid adoption of +the railroad when once introduced.</p> + +<p>The first line of rails in the New England States is +said to have been laid down at Quincy, Mass., from the +granite quarry to the Neponset River, three miles away, in +1826 and 1827. That between the coal-mines of Mauch +Chunk, Pa., and the river Lehigh, nine miles distant, was +built in 1827. In the following year the Delaware & +Hudson Canal Company built a railroad from their mines +to the termination of the canal at Honesdale. These roads +were worked either by gravity or by horses and mules.</p> + +<p>The competition at Rainhill, on the Liverpool and Manchester +Railroad, had been so widely advertised, and promised +to afford such conclusive evidence relative to the value +of the locomotive steam-engine and the railroad, that engineers +and others interested in the subject came from all +parts of the world to witness the trial. Among the strangers +present were Mr. Horatio Allen, then chief-engineer of +the Delaware & Hudson Canal Company, and Mr. E. L. +Miller, a resident of Charleston, S. C., who went from the +United States for the express purpose of seeing the new +machines tested.</p> + +<p>Mr. Allen had been authorized to purchase, for the company +with which he was connected, three locomotives and +the iron for the road, and had already shipped one engine +to the United States, and had set it at work on the road. +This engine was received in New York in May, 1829, and +its trial took place in August at Honesdale, Mr. Allen himself +driving the engine. But the track proved too light for +the locomotive, and it was laid up and never set at regular +work. This engine was called the “Stourbridge Lion”; it +was built by Foster, Rastrick & Co., of Stourbridge, England.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">[209]</a></span> +During the summer of the next year, a small experimental +engine, which was built in 1829 by Peter Cooper, +of New York, was successfully tried on the Baltimore & +Ohio Railroad, at Baltimore, making 13 miles in less than +an hour, and moving, at some points on the road, at the rate +of 18 miles an hour. One carriage carrying 36 passengers +was attached. This was considered a working-model only, +and was rated at one horse-power.</p> + +<p>Ross Winans, writing of this trial of Cooper’s engine, +makes a comparison with the work done by Stephenson’s +“Rocket,” and claims a decided superiority for the former. +He concluded that the trial established fully the practicability +of using locomotives on the Baltimore & Ohio road +at high speeds, and on all its curves and heavy gradients, +without inconvenience or danger.</p> + +<p>This engine had a vertical tubular boiler, and the draught +was urged, like that of the “Novelty” at Liverpool, by mechanical +means—a revolving fan. The single steam-cylinder +was 3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> +inches in diameter, and the stroke of piston 14<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> +inches. The wheels were 30 inches in diameter, and connected +to the crank-shaft by gearing. The engine, on the +trial, worked up to 1.43 horse-power, and drew a gross +weight of 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons. Mr. Cooper, unable to find such tubes +as he needed for his boiler, used gun-barrels. The whole +machine weighed less than a ton.</p> + +<p>Messrs. Davis & Gartner, a little later, built the “York” +for this road—a locomotive having also a vertical boiler, of +very similar form to the modern steam fire-engine boiler, 51 +inches in diameter, and containing 282 fire-tubes, 16 inches +long, and tapering from 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches diameter at the bottom +to 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> at the top, where the gases were discharged through +a combustion-chamber into a steam-chimney. This engine +weighed 3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig59" id="Fig59"></a> +<img src="images/illo237.png" alt="The 'Atlantic'" width="372" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 59.</span>—The “Atlantic,” 1882.</p></div> + +<p>They subsequently built several “grasshopper” engines +(<a href="#Fig59">Fig. 59</a>), some of which ran many years, doing good work, +and one or two of which are still in existence. The first—the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">[210]</a></span> +“Atlantic”—was set at work in September, 1832, and +hauled 50 tons from Baltimore 40 miles, over gradients having +a maximum rise of 37 feet to the mile, and on curves +having a minimum radius of 400 feet, at the rate of 12 to +15 miles an hour. This engine weighed 6<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons, carried 50 +pounds of steam—a pressure then common on both continents +—and burned a ton of anthracite coal on the round trip. +The blast was secured by a fan, and the valve-gear was +worked by cams instead of eccentrics. This engine made +the round trip at a cost of $16, doing the work of 42 horses, +which had cost $33 per trip. The engine cost $4,500, and +was designed by Phineas Davis, assisted by Ross Winans.</p> + +<p>Mr. Miller, on his return from the Liverpool & Manchester +trial, ordered a locomotive for the Charleston & +Hamburg Railroad from the West Point Foundery. This<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">[211]</a></span> +engine was guaranteed by Mr. Miller to draw three times +its weight at the rate of 10 miles an hour. It was built +during the summer of 1830, from the plans of Mr. Miller, +and reached Charleston in October. The trials were made +in November and December.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig60" id="Fig60"></a> +<img src="images/illo238.png" alt="The 'Best Friend'" width="424" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 60.</span>—The “Best Friend,” 1830.</p></div> + +<p>This engine (<a href="#Fig60">Fig. 60</a>) had a vertical tubular boiler, in +which the gases rose through a very high fire-box, into +which large numbers of rods projected from the sides and +top, and passed out through tubes leading them laterally +outward into an outside jacket, through which they rose to +the chimney. The steam-cylinders were two in number, +8 inches in diameter and of 16 inches stroke, inclined so as +to connect with the driving-axle. The four wheels were all +of the same size, 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter, and connected by +coupling-rods. The engine weighed 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons. The “Best +Friend,” as it was called, did excellent work until June, +1831, when the explosion of the boiler, in consequence of the +recklessness of the fireman, unexpectedly closed its career.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig61" id="Fig61"> +</a><img src="images/illo239.png" alt="The 'West Point'" width="369" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 61.</span>—The “West Point,” 1831.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">[212]</a></span>A second +engine (<a href="#Fig61">Fig. 61</a>) was built for this road, at the +West Point Foundery, from plans furnished by Horatio +Allen, and was received and set at work early in the spring +of 1831. The engine, called the “West Point,” had a horizontal +tubular boiler, but was in other respects very similar +to the “Best Friend.” It is said to have done very good +work.</p> + +<p>The Mohawk & Hudson Railroad ordered an engine +at about this time, also, of the West Point Foundery, and +the trials, made in July and August, 1831, proved thoroughly +successful.</p> + +<p>This engine, the “De Witt Clinton,” was contracted for +by John B. Jervis, and fitted up by David Matthew. It +had two steam-cylinders, each 5<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter and 16 +inches stroke of piston. The connecting-rods were directly<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">[213]</a></span> +attached to a cranked axle, and turned four coupled wheels +4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter. These wheels had cast-iron hubs and +wrought-iron spokes and tires. The tubes were of copper, +2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter and 6 feet long. The engine weighed +3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons, and hauled 5 cars at the rate of 30 miles an hour.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig62" id="Fig62"></a> +<img src="images/illo240.png" alt="The 'South Carolina'" width="450" height="275" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 62.</span>—The “South Carolina,” 1831.</p></div> + +<p>Another engine, the “South Carolina” (<a href="#Fig62">Fig. 62</a>), was +designed by Horatio Allen for the South Carolina Railroad, +and completed late in the year 1831. This was the first +eight-wheeled engine, and the prototype, also, of a peculiar +and lately-revived form of engine.</p> + +<p>In the summer of 1832, an engine built by Messrs. Davis +& Gartner, of York, Pa., was put on the Baltimore & +Ohio road, which at times attained a speed, unloaded, of 30 +miles an hour. The engine weighed 3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons, and drew, +usually, 4 cars, weighing altogether 14 tons, from Baltimore +to Ellicott’s Mills, a distance of 13 miles, in the schedule-time, +one hour.</p> + +<p>Horatio Allen’s engine on the South Carolina Railroad +is said to have been the first eight-wheeled engine ever built.</p> + +<p>It was at about the time of which we are now writing +that the first locomotive was built of what is now distinctively<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">[214]</a></span> +known as the American type—an engine with a +“truck” or “bogie” under the forward end of the boiler. +This was the “American” No. 1, built at the West Point +Foundery, from plans furnished by John B. Jervis, Chief +Engineer, for the Mohawk & Hudson Railroad. Ross +Winans had already (1831) introduced the passenger-car +with swiveling trucks.<a name="FNanchor_56_56" id="FNanchor_56_56"></a><a href="#Footnote_56_56" +class="fnanchor">[56]</a> It was completed in August, 1832, +and is said by Mr. Matthew to have been an extremely fast +and smooth-running engine. A mile a minute was repeatedly +attained, and it is stated by the same authority,<a name="FNanchor_57_57" +id="FNanchor_57_57"></a><a href="#Footnote_57_57" class="fnanchor">[57]</a> that +a speed of 80 miles an hour was sometimes made over a +single mile. This engine had cylinders 9<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches diameter, +16 inches stroke of piston, two pairs of driving-wheels, +coupled, 5 feet in diameter each; and the truck had four +33-inch wheels. The boiler contained tubes 3 inches in diameter, +and its fire-box was 5 feet long and 2 feet 10 inches +wide. Robert Stephenson & Co. subsequently built a similar +engine, from the plans of Mr. Jervis, and for the same +road. It was set at work in 1833. In both engines the +driving-wheels were behind the fire-box. This engine is +another illustration of the fact—shown by the description +already given of other and earlier engines—that the independence +of the American mechanic, and the boldness and +self-confidence which have to the present time distinguished +him, were among the earliest of the fruits of our political +independence and freedom.</p> + +<p>These American engines were all designed to burn anthracite +coal. The English locomotives all burned bituminous +coal.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig63" id="Fig63"></a> +<img src="images/illo242.png" alt="Stevens Rail" width="600" height="162" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 63.</span>—The “Stevens” Rail. Enlarged Section.</p></div> + +<p>Robert L. Stevens, the President and Engineer of the +Camden & Amboy Railroad, and a distinguished son of +Colonel John Stevens, of Hoboken, was engaged, at the +time of the opening of the Liverpool & Manchester Railroad,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">[215]</a></span> +in the construction of the Camden & Amboy Railroad. +It was here that the first of the now standard form +of <i>T</i>-rail was laid down. It was of malleable iron, and of +the form shown in the accompanying figure. It was designed +by Mr. Stevens, and is known in the United States +as the “Stevens” rail. In Europe, where it was introduced +some years afterward, it is sometimes called the “Vignolles” +rail. He purchased an engine of the Stephensons soon after +the trial at Rainhill, and this engine, the “John Bull,” was +set up on the then uncompleted road at Bordentown, in the +year 1831. Its first public trial was made in November of +that year. The road was opened for traffic, from end to +end, two years later. This engine had steam-cylinders 9 +inches in diameter, 2 feet stroke of piston, one pair of drivers +4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter, and weighed 10 tons. This engine, +and that built by Phineas Davis for the Baltimore & Ohio +Railroad, were exhibited at the Centennial Exhibition at +Philadelphia, in the year 1876.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig64" id="Fig64"></a> +<img src="images/illo243.png" alt="'Old Ironsides'" width="450" height="293" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 64.</span>—“Old Ironsides,” 1832.</p></div> + +<p>Engines supplied to the Camden & Amboy Railroad +subsequent to 1831 were built from the designs of Robert +L. Stevens, in the shop of the Messrs. Stevens, at +Hoboken. The other principal roads of the country, at +first, very generally purchased their engines of the Baldwin +Locomotive Works, then a small shop owned by Matthias +W. Baldwin. Baldwin’s first engine was a little model +built for Peale’s Museum, to illustrate to the visitors of that +then well-known place of entertainment the character of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">[216]</a></span> +new motor, the success of which, at Rainhill, had just then +excited the attention of the world. This was in 1831, and +the successful working of this little model led to his receiving +an order for an engine from the Philadelphia & +Germantown Railroad. Mr. Baldwin, after studying the +new engine of the Camden & Amboy road, made his plans, +and built an engine (<a href="#Fig64">Fig. 64</a>), completing it in the autumn +of 1832, and setting it in operation November 23d of that +year. It was kept at work on that line of road for a period +of 20 years or more. This engine was of Stephenson’s +“Planet” class, mounted on two driving-wheels 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in +diameter each, and two separate wheels of the same size, +uncoupled. The steam-cylinders were 9<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter, +18 inches stroke of piston, and were placed horizontally +on each side of the smoke-box. The boiler, 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter, +contained 72 copper tubes 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter and 7 +feet long. The engine cost the railroad company $3,500. +On the trial, steam was raised in 20 minutes, and the maximum +speed noted was 28 miles an hour. The engine subsequently +attained a speed of over 30 miles. In 1834, Mr.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">[217]</a></span> +Baldwin completed for Mr. E. L. Miller, of Charleston, a +six-wheeled engine, the “E. L. Miller” (<a href="#Fig65">Fig. 65</a>), with cylinders +10 inches in diameter and 16 inches stroke of piston. +He made the boiler of this engine of a form which remained +standard many years, with a high dome over the fire-box. +At about the same time, he built the “Lancaster,” an engine +resembling the “Miller,” for the State road to Columbia, +and several others were soon contracted for and built. By +the end of 1834, 5 engines had been built by him, and the +construction of locomotive-engines had become one of the +leading and most promising industries of the United States. +Mr. William Norris established a shop in Philadelphia in +1832, which he gradually enlarged until it, like the Baldwin +Works, became a large establishment. He usually +built a six-wheeled engine, with a leading-truck or bogie, +and placed his driving-wheels in front of the fire-box.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig65" id="Fig65"></a> +<img src="images/illo244.png" alt="The 'E.L. Miller'" width="400" height="287" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 65.</span>—The “E. L. Miller,” 1834.</p></div> + +<p>At this time the English locomotives were built to carry +60 pounds of steam. The American builders adopted pressures +of 120 to 130 pounds per square inch, the now generally +standard pressures throughout the world. In the years +1836 and 1837, Baldwin built 80 engines. They were of +three classes: 1st, with cylinders 12<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter +and of 16 inches stroke, weighing 12 tons; 2d, with cylinders<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">[218]</a></span> +12 by 16, and a weight of 10<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons; and 3d, engines +weighing 9 tons, and having steam-cylinders of 10<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches +diameter and of the same stroke. The driving-wheels were +usually 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter, and the cylinder “inside-connected” +to cranked axles. A few “outside-connected” engines +were made, this plan becoming generally adopted at +a later period.</p> + +<p>The railroads of the United States were very soon supplied +with locomotive-engines built in America. In the +year 1836, William Norris, who had two years before purchased +the interest of Colonel Stephen H. Long, an army-officer +who patented and built locomotives of his own design, +built the “George Washington,” and set it at work. +This engine, weighing 14,400 pounds, drew 19,200 pounds +up an incline 2,800 feet long, rising 369 feet to the mile, at +the speed of 15<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles an hour. This showed an adhesion +not far from one-third the weight on the driving-wheels. +This was considered a very wonderful performance, and it +produced such an impression at the time, that several copies +of the “George Washington” were made, on orders from +British railroads, and the result was the establishment of +the reputation of the locomotive-engine builders of the +United States upon a foundation which has never since +failed them. The engine had Jervis’s forward-truck, now +always seen under standard engines, which had already been +placed under railroad-cars by Ross Winans.</p> + +<p>In New England, the Locks & Canals Company, of +Lowell, began building engines as early as 1834, copying +the Stephenson engine. Hinckley & Drury, of Boston, +commenced building an outside-connected engine in 1840, +and their successors, the Boston Locomotive Works, became +the largest manufacturing establishment of the kind in New +England. Two years later, Ross Winans, the Baltimore +builder, introduced some of his engines upon Eastern railroads, +fitting them with upright boilers, and burning anthracite +coal.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">[219]</a></span>The changes which have been outlined produced the +now typical American locomotive. It was necessarily given +such form that it would work safely and efficiently on rough, +ill-ballasted, and often sharply-winding tracks; and thus it +soon became evident that the two pairs of coupled driving-wheels, +carrying two-thirds the weight of the whole engine, +the forward-truck, and the system of “equalizing” suspension-bars, +by which the weight is distributed fairly among +all the wheels, whatever the position of the engine, or whatever +the irregularity of the track, made it the very best of +all known types of locomotive for the railroads of a new +country. Experience has shown it equally excellent on the +smoothest and best of roads. The “cow-catcher,” placed +in front to remove obstacles from the track, the bell, and +the heavy whistle, are characteristics of the American engine +also. The severity of winter-storms compelled the +adoption of the “cab,” or house, and the use of wood for +fuel led to the invention of the “spark-arrester” for that +class of engines. The heavy grades on many roads led to +the use of the “sand-box,” from which sand was sprinkled +on the track, to prevent the slipping of the wheels.</p> + +<p>In the year 1836, the now standard chilled wheel was +introduced for cars and trucks; the single eccentric, which +had been, until then, used on Baldwin engines, was displaced +by the double eccentric, with hooks in place of the +link; and, a year later, the iron frame took the place of +the previously-used wooden frame on all engines.</p> + +<p>The year 1837 introduced a period of great depression +in all branches of industry, which continued until the year +1840, or later, and seriously checked all kinds of manufacturing, +including the building of locomotives. On the revival +of business, numbers of new locomotive-works were +started, and in these establishments originated many new +types of engine, each of the more successful of which was +adapted to some peculiar set of conditions. This variety of +type is still seen on nearly all of the principal roads.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">[220]</a></span>The direction of change in the construction of locomotive-engines +at the period at which this division of the subject +terminates is very well indicated in a letter from Robert +Stephenson to Robert L. Stevens, dated 1833, which is +now preserved at the Stevens Institute of Technology. He +writes: “I am sorry that the feeling in the United States +in favor of light railways is so general. In England we are +making every succeeding railway stronger and more substantial.” +He adds: “Small engines are losing ground, +and large ones are daily demonstrating that powerful engines +are the most economical.” He gives a sketch of his +latest engine, weighing <i>nine tons</i>, and capable, as he states, +of “taking 100 tons, gross load, at the rate of 16 or 17 miles +an hour on a level.” To-day there are engines built weighing +70 tons, and our locomotive-builders have standard sizes +guaranteed to draw over 2,000 tons on a good and level +track.</p> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> <i>Vide</i> “Theatrum Machinarum,” vol. iii., Tab. 30.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> Evans’s prediction is less remarkable than that of Darwin, <a href="#Darwin">elsewhere</a> +quoted.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_46_46" id="Footnote_46_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> <i>See</i> “Life of Trevithick.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_47_47" id="Footnote_47_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> For a detailed account of the progress of steam on the highway, <i>see</i> +“Steam on Common Roads,” etc., by Young, Holley, & Fisher, London, +1861.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_48_48" id="Footnote_48_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> “Life of Trevithick.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_49_49" id="Footnote_49_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> Printed by T. & J. Swords, 160 Pearl Street, New York, 1812.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_50_50" id="Footnote_50_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> “Progress of the City of New York.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_51_51" id="Footnote_51_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51_51"><span class="label">[51]</span></a> “<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/27710">Lives of +George and Robert Stephenson</a>,” by Samuel Smiles. New +York and London, 1868.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_52_52" id="Footnote_52_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52_52"><span class="label">[52]</span></a> <i>Vide</i> “A Description of the Safety-Lamp invented by George Stephenson,” +etc., London, 1817.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_53_53" id="Footnote_53_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53_53"><span class="label">[53]</span></a> The American chilled wheel of cast-iron, a better wheel than that above +described, has never been generally and successfully introduced in Europe.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_54_54" id="Footnote_54_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54_54"><span class="label">[54]</span></a> Smiles.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_55_55" id="Footnote_55_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_55"><span class="label">[55]</span></a> One of these sectional boilers is still preserved in the lecture-room +of the author, at the Stevens Institute of Technology.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_56_56" id="Footnote_56_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56_56"><span class="label">[56]</span></a> “History of the First Locomotives in America,” Brown.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_57_57" id="Footnote_57_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57_57"><span class="label">[57]</span></a> “Ross Winans <i>vs.</i> +The Eastern Railroad Company—Evidence.” Boston, 1854.</p></div> + +<hr class="l05" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/illo247.png" alt="Ornament" width="250" height="239" /></div> + +<hr class="c40" /><p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">[221]</a></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V"></a>CHAPTER V.</h2> + +<h3><i>THE MODERN STEAM-ENGINE.</i></h3> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Voilà la plus merveilleuse de toutes les Machines; le Mécanisme ressemble +à celui des animaux. La chaleur est le principe de son mouvement; +il se fait dans ses différens tuyaux une circulation, comme celle du sang +dans les veines, ayant des valvules qui s’ouvrent et se ferment à propos; +elles se nourrit, s’évacue d’elle même dans les temps réglés, et tire de son travail +tout ce qu’il lui faut pour subsister. Cette Machine a pris sa naissance +en Angleterre, et toutes les Machines à feu qu’on a construites ailleurs +que dans la Grande Brétagne ont été exécutées par des +Anglais.”—<span class="smcap">Belidor.</span></p></div> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<h4><span class="smcap">The Second Period of Application—1800-1850 (continued). +The Steam-Engine Applied to Ship-Propulsion.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>Among the most obviously important and most inconceivably +fruitful of all the applications of steam which marked +the period we are now studying, is that of the steam-engine +to the propulsion of vessels. This direction of application +has been that which has, from the earliest period in +the history of the steam-engine, attracted the attention of +the political economist and the historian, as well as the +mechanician, whenever a new improvement, or the revival +of an old device, has awakened a faint conception of the +possibilities attendant upon the introduction of a machine +capable of making so great a force available. The realization +of the hopes, the prophecies, and the aspirations of +earlier times, in the modern marine steam-engine, may be +justly regarded as the greatest of all the triumphs of mechanical +engineering. Although, as has already been stated,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">[222]</a></span> +attempts were made at a very early period to effect this +application of steam-power, they were not successful, and +the steamship is a product of the present century. No +such attempts were commercially successful until after the +time of Newcomen and Watt, and at the commencement of +the nineteenth century. It is, indeed, but a few years since +the passage across the Atlantic was frequently made in +sailing-vessels, and the dangers, the discomforts, and the +irregularities of their trips were most serious. Now, hardly +a day passes that does not see several large and powerful +steamers leaving the ports of New York and Liverpool to +make the same voyages, and their passages are made with +such regularity and safety, that travelers can anticipate with +confidence the time of their arrival at the termination of +their voyage to a day, and can cross with safety and with +comparative comfort even amid the storms of winter. Yet all +that we to-day see of the extent and the efficiency of steam-navigation +has been the work of the present century, and it +may well excite our wonder and our admiration.</p> + +<p>The history of this development of the use of steam-power +illustrates most perfectly that process of growth of +this invention which has been already referred to; and +we can here trace it, step by step, from the earliest and +rudest devices up to those most recent and most perfect designs +which represent the most successful existing types of +the heat-engine—whether considered with reference to its +design and construction, or as the highest application of +known scientific principles—that have yet been seen in even +the present advanced state of the mechanic arts.</p> + +<p>The paddle-wheel was used as a substitute for oars at a +very early date, and a description of paddle-wheels applied +to vessels, curiously illustrated by a large wood-cut, may be +found in the work of Fammelli, “De l’artificioses machines,” +published in old French in 1588. Clark<a name="FNanchor_58_58" id="FNanchor_58_58"></a><a +href="#Footnote_58_58" class="fnanchor">[58]</a> quotes from<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">[223]</a></span> +Ogilby’s edition of the “Odyssey” a stanza which reads +like a prophecy, and almost awakens a belief that the +great poet had a knowledge of steam-vessels in those early +times—a thousand years before the Christian era. The +prince thus addresses Ulysses:</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">“We use nor Helm nor Helms-man. Our tall ships<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Have Souls, and plow with Reason up the deeps;<br /></span> +<span class="i2">All cities, Countries know, and where they list,<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Through billows glide, veiled in obscuring Mist;<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Nor fear they Rocks, nor Dangers on the way.”<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p><a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3160">Pope’s translation</a><a name="FNanchor_59_59" id="FNanchor_59_59"></a><a +href="#Footnote_59_59" class="fnanchor">[59]</a> furnishes the following rendering of +Homer’s prophecy:</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">“So shalt thou instant reach the realm assigned,<br /></span> +<span class="i2">In wondrous ships, self-moved, instinct with mind;<br /></span> +<span class="i2">...<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Though clouds and darkness veil the encumbered sky,<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Fearless, through darkness and through clouds they fly.<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Though tempests rage, though rolls the swelling main,<br /></span> +<span class="i2">The seas may roll, the tempests swell in vain;<br /></span> +<span class="i2">E’en the stern god that o’er the waves presides,<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Safe as they pass and safe repass the tide,<br /></span> +<span class="i2">With fury burns; while, careless, they convey<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Promiscuous every guest to every bay.”<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>It is stated that the Roman army under Claudius Caudex +was taken across to Sicily in boats propelled by paddle-wheels +turned by oxen. Vulturius gives pictures of such +vessels.</p> + +<p>This application of the force of steam was very possibly +anticipated 600 years ago by Roger Bacon, the learned +Franciscan monk, who, in an age of ignorance and intellectual +torpor, wrote:</p> + +<p>“I will now mention some wonderful works of art and +nature, in which there is nothing of magic, and which magic<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">[224]</a></span> +could not perform. Instruments may be made by which +the largest ships, with only one man guiding them, will be +carried with greater velocity than if they were full of sailors,” +etc., etc.</p> + +<p>Darwin’s <a href="#Darwin">poetical prophecy</a> was published long years +before Watt’s engine rendered its partial fulfillment a possibility; +and thus, for many years before even the first +promising effort had been made, the minds of the more intelligent +had been prepared to appreciate the invention +when it should finally be brought forward.</p> + +<p>The earliest attempt to propel a vessel by steam is +claimed by Spanish authorities, as has been stated, to have +been made by Blasco de Garay, in the harbor of Barcelona, +Spain, in 1543. The record, claimed as having been extracted +from the Spanish archives at Simancas, states the +vessel to have been of 200 tons burden, and to have been +moved by paddle-wheels; and it is added that the spectators +saw, although not allowed closely to inspect the apparatus, +that one part of it was a “vessel of boiling water”; +and it is also stated that objection was made to the use of +this part of the machine, because of the danger of explosion.</p> + +<p>The account seems somewhat apocryphal, and it certainly +led to no useful results.</p> + +<p>In an anonymous English pamphlet, published in 1651, +which is supposed by Stuart to have been written by the +Marquis of Worcester, an indefinite reference to what may +probably have been the steam-engine is made, and it is +there stated to be capable of successful application to propelling +boats.</p> + +<p>In 1690, Papin proposed to use his piston-engine to +drive paddle-wheels to propel vessels; and in 1707 he applied +the steam-engine, which he had proposed as a pumping-engine, +to driving a model boat on the Fulda at Cassel. +In this trial he used the arrangement of which a sketch has +been shown, his pumping-engine forcing up water to turn a +water-wheel, which, in turn, was made to drive the paddles.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">[225]</a></span> +An account of his experiments is to be found in manuscript +in the correspondence between Leibnitz and Papin, preserved +in the Royal Library at Hanover. Professor Joy +found there the following letter:<a name="FNanchor_60_60" id="FNanchor_60_60"></a><a +href="#Footnote_60_60" class="fnanchor">[60]</a></p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Dionysius Papin, Councillor and Physician to his Royal Highness the +Elector of Cassel, also Professor of Mathematics at Marburg, is about to +dispatch a vessel of singular construction down the river Weser to Bremen. +As he learns that all ships coming from Cassel, or any point on the Fulda, +are not permitted to enter the Weser, but are required to unload at Münden, +and as he anticipates some difficulty, although those vessels have a different +object, his own not being intended for freight, he begs most humbly +that a gracious order be granted that his ship may be allowed to pass unmolested +through the Electoral domain; which petition I most humbly support.</p> + +<p class="smcap right">G. W. Leibnitz.</p> + +<p>“<span class="smcap">Hanover</span>, <i>July 13, 1707</i>.”</p></div> + +<p>This letter was returned to Leibnitz, with the following +indorsement:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“The Electoral Councillors have found serious obstacles in the way of +granting the above petition, and, without giving their reasons, have directed +me to inform you of their decision, and that, in consequence, the request is +not granted by his Electoral Highness.</p> + +<p class="smcap right">H. Reiche.</p> + +<p>“<span class="smcap">Hanover</span>, <i>July 25, 1707</i>.”</p></div> + +<p>This failure of Papin’s petition was the death-blow to +his effort to establish steam-navigation. A mob of boatmen, +who thought they saw in the embryo steamship the +ruin of their business, attacked the vessel at night, and utterly +destroyed it. Papin narrowly escaped with his life, +and fled to England.</p> + +<p>In the year 1736, Jonathan Hulls took out an English +patent for the use of a steam-engine for ship-propulsion, +proposing to employ his steamboat in towing. In 1737 he +published a well-written pamphlet, describing this apparatus, +which is shown in <a href="#Fig66">Fig. 66</a>, a reduced fac-simile of +the plate accompanying his paper.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">[226]</a></span>He proposed using the Newcomen engine, fitted with a +counterpoise-weight and a system of ropes and grooved +wheels, which, by a peculiar ratchet-like action, gave a continuous +rotary motion. His vessel was to have been used +as a tow-boat. He says, in his description: “In some convenient +part of the Tow-boat there is placed a Vessel about +two-3rds full of water, with the Top closed; and this Vessel +being kept Boiling, rarifies the Water into a Steam, this +Steam being convey’d thro’ a large pipe into a cylindrical +Vessel, and there condensed, makes a Vacuum, which causes +the weight of the atmosphere to press down on this Vessel, +and so presses down a Piston that is fitted into this Cylindrical +Vessel, in the same manner as in Mr. Newcomen’s +Engine, with which he raises Water by Fire.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig66" id="Fig66"></a> +<img src="images/illo253.png" alt="Hulls's Steamboat" width="600" height="275" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 66.</span>—Hulls’s Steamboat, 1736.</p></div> + +<p>“<i>P</i>, the Pipe coming from the Furnace to the Cylinder. +<i>Q</i>, the Cylinder wherein the steam is condensed. <i>R</i>, the +Valve that stops the Steam from coming into the Cylinder, +whilst the Steam within the same is condensed. <i>S</i>, the +Pipe to convey the condensing Water into the Cylinder. +<i>T</i>, a cock to let in the condensing Water when the Cylinder +is full of Steam and the Valve, <i>P</i>, is shut. <i>U</i>, a Rope fixed +to the Piston that slides up and down in the Cylinder.</p> + +<p>“<i>Note.</i> This Rope, <i>U</i>, is the same Rope that goes round +the wheel, <i>D</i>, in the machine.”</p> + +<p>In the large division of his plate, <i>A</i> is the chimney; +<i>B</i><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">[227]</a></span> +is the tow-boat; <i>CC</i> is the frame carrying the engine; +<i>Da</i>, <i>D</i>, and <i>Db</i> are three wheels carrying the ropes <i>M</i>, +<i>Fb</i>, and <i>Fa</i>, <i>M</i> being the rope <i>U</i> of his smaller figure, 30. +<i>Ha</i> and <i>Hb</i> are two wheels on the paddle-shafts, <i>II</i>, arranged +with pawls so that the paddle-wheel, <i>II</i>, always +turns the same way, though the wheels <i>Ha</i> and <i>Hb</i> are +given a reciprocating motion; <i>Fb</i> is a rope connecting +the wheels in the vessel, <i>Db</i>, with the wheels at the stern. +Hulls says:</p> + +<p>“When the Weight, <i>G</i>, is so raised, while the wheels +<i>Da</i>, <i>D</i>, and <i>Db</i> are moving backward, the Rope <i>Fa</i> gives +way, and the Power of the Weight, <i>G</i>, brings the Wheel +<i>Ha</i> forward, and the Fans with it, so that the Fans always +keep going forward, notwithstanding the Wheels <i>Da</i>, <i>D</i>, +and <i>Db</i> move backward and forward as the Piston moves +up and down in the Cylinder. <i>LL</i> are Teeth for a Catch +to drop in from the Axis, and are so contrived that they +catch in an alternate manner, to cause the Fan to move +always forward, for the Wheel <i>Ha</i>, by the power of the +weight, <i>G</i>, is performing his Office while the other wheel, +<i>Hb</i>, goes back in order to fetch another stroke.</p> + +<p>“<i>Note.</i> The weight, <i>G</i>, must contain but half the weight +of the Pillar of Air pressing on the Piston, because the +weight, <i>G</i>, is raised at the same time as the Wheel <i>Hb</i> performs +its Office, so that it is in effect two Machines acting +alternately, by the weight of one Pillar of Air, of such a +Diameter as the Diameter of the Cylinder is.”</p> + +<p>The inventor suggests the use of timber guards to protect +the wheels from injury, and, in shallow water, the attachment +to the paddle-shafts of cranks “to strike a Shaft +to the Bottom of the River, which will drive the Vessel +forward with the greater Force.” He concludes: “Thus I +have endeavoured to give a clear and satisfactory Account +of my New-invented Machine, for carrying Vessels out of +and into any Port, Harbour, or River, against Wind and +Tide, or in a Calm; and I doubt not but whoever shall<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">[228]</a></span> +give himself the Trouble to peruse this Essay, will be so +candid as to excuse or overlook any Imperfections in the +diction or manner of writing, considering the Hand it comes +from, if what I have imagined may only appear as plain to +others as it has done to me, viz., That the Scheme I now +offer is Practicable, and if encouraged will be Useful.”</p> + +<p>There is no positive evidence that Hulls ever put his +scheme to the test of experiment, although tradition does +say that he made a model, which he tried with such ill success +as to prevent his prosecution of the experiment further; +and doggerel rhymes are still extant which were sung +by his neighbors in derision of his folly, as they considered +it.</p> + +<p>A prize was awarded by the French Academy of Sciences, +in 1752, for the best essay on the manner of impelling +vessels without wind. It was given to Bernouilli, who, +in his paper, proposed a set of vanes like those of a windmill—a +screw, in fact—one to be placed on each side of the +vessel, and two more behind. For a vessel of 100 tons, he +proposed a shaft 14 feet long and 2 inches in diameter, carrying +“eight wheels, for acting on the water, to each of +which it” (the shaft) “is perpendicular, and forms an axis +for them all; the wheels should be at equal distances from +each other. Each wheel consists of 8 arms of iron, each 3 +feet long, so that the whole diameter of the wheel is 6 feet. +Each of these arms, at the distance of 20 inches from the +centre, carries a sheet-iron plane (or paddle) 16 inches +square, which is inclined so as to form an angle of 60 degrees, +both with the arbor and keel of the vessel, to which +the arbor is placed parallel. To sustain this arbor and +the wheels, two strong bars of iron, between 2 and 3 +inches thick, proceed from the side of the vessel at right +angles to it, about 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet below the surface of the water.” +He proposed similar screw-propellers at the stern, and +suggested that they could be driven by animal or by steam-power.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">[229]</a></span> +But a more remarkable essay is quoted by Figuier<a name="FNanchor_61_61" id="FNanchor_61_61"></a><a +href="#Footnote_61_61" class="fnanchor">[61]</a>—the +paper of l’Abbé Gauthier, published in the “Mémoires de +la Société Royale des Sciences et Lettres de Nancy.” Bernouilli +had expressed the belief that the best steam-engine +then known—that of Newcomen—was not superior to some +other motors. Gauthier proposed to use that engine in +the propulsion of paddle-wheels placed at the side of +the vessel. His plan was not brought into use, but his +paper embodied a glowing description of the advantages +to be secured by its adoption. He states that a +galley urged by 26 oars on a side made but 4,320 toises +(8,420 meters), or about 5 miles, an hour, and required +a crew of 260 men. A steam-engine, doing the same +work, would be ready for action at all times, could +be applied, when not driving the vessel, to raising the +anchor, working the pumps, and to ventilating the ship, +while the fire would also serve to cook with. The engine +would occupy less space and weight than the men, would +require less aliment, and that of a less expensive kind, etc. +He would make the boiler safe against explosions by bands +of iron; would make the fire-box of iron, with a water-filled +ash-pit and base-plate. His injection-water was to +come from the sea, and return by a delivery-pipe placed +above the water-line. The chains, usually leading from the +end of the beam to the pump-rods, were to be carried +around wheels on the paddle-shaft, which were to be provided +with pawls entering a ratchet, and thus the paddles, +having been given several revolutions by the descent of the +piston and the unwinding of the chain, were to revolve +freely while the return-stroke was made, the chain being +hauled down and rewound by the wheel on the shaft, the +latter being moved by a weight. The engine was proposed +to be of 6 feet stroke, and to make 15 strokes per minute, +with a force of 11,000 pounds.</p> + +<p>A little later (1760), a Swiss clergyman, J. A. Genevois,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">[230]</a></span> +published in London a paper relating to the improvement +of navigation,<a name="FNanchor_62_62" id="FNanchor_62_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_62_62" class="fnanchor">[62]</a> +in which his plan was proposed of compressing +springs by steam or other power, and applying their +effort while recovering their form to ship-propulsion.</p> + +<p>It was at this time that the first attempts were made in +the United States to solve this problem, which had begun +to be recognized as one of the greatest which had presented +itself to the mechanic and the engineer.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">William Henry</span> was a prominent citizen of the then little +village of Lancaster, Pa., and was noted as an ingenious +and successful mechanic.<a name="FNanchor_63_63" id="FNanchor_63_63"></a><a href="#Footnote_63_63" +class="fnanchor">[63]</a> He was still living at the beginning +of the present century. Mr. Henry was the first to make +the “rag” carpet, and was the inventor of the screw-auger. +He was of a Scotch and North-of-Ireland family, his father, +John Henry, and his two older brothers, Robert and James, +having come to the United States about 1720. Robert settled, +finally, in Virginia, and it is said that Patrick Henry, +the patriot and orator, was of his family. The others remained +in Chester County, Pa., where William was born, +in 1729. He learned the trade of a gunsmith, and, driven +from his home during the Indian war (1755 to 1760), settled +in Lancaster.</p> + +<p>In the year 1760 he went to England on business, where +his attention was attracted to the invention—then new, and +the subject of discussion in every circle—of James Watt. +He saw the possibility of its application to navigation and to +driving carriages, and, on his return home, commenced the +construction of a steam-engine, and finished it in 1763.</p> + +<p>Placing it in a boat fitted with paddle-wheels, he made +a trial of the new machine on the Conestoga River, near +Lancaster, where the craft, by some accident, sank,<a name="FNanchor_64_64" id="FNanchor_64_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_64_64" +class="fnanchor">[64]</a> and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">[231]</a></span> +was lost. He was not discouraged by this failure, but +made a second model, adding some improvements. Among +the records of the Pennsylvania Philosophical Society is, or +was, a design, presented by Henry in 1782, of one of his +steamboats. The German traveler Schöpff visited the +United States in 1783, and at Mr. Henry’s house, at Lancaster, +was shown “a machine by Mr. Henry, intended for +the propelling of boats, etc.; ‘but,’ said Mr. Henry, ‘I am +doubtful whether such a machine would find favor with +the public, as every one considers it impracticable against +wind and tide;’ but that such a Boat <i>will</i> come into use +and navigate on the waters of the Ohio and Mississippi, +he had not the least doubt of, but the time had not yet +arrived of its being appreciated and applied.”</p> + +<p>John Fitch, whose experiments will presently be referred +to, was an acquaintance and frequent visitor to the +house of Mr. Henry, and may probably have there received +the earliest suggestions of the importance of this application +of steam. About 1777, when Henry was engaged in +making mathematical and philosophical instruments, and +the screw-auger, which at that time could only be obtained +of him, Robert Fulton, then twelve years old, visited him, +to study the paintings of Benjamin West, who had long +been a friend and protégé of Henry. He, too, not improbably +received there the first suggestion which afterward led +him to desert the art to which he at first devoted himself, +and which made of the young portrait-painter a successful +inventor and engineer. West’s acquaintance with Henry +had no such result. The young painter was led by his +patron and friend to attempt historical pictures,<a name="FNanchor_65_65" id="FNanchor_65_65"></a><a +href="#Footnote_65_65" class="fnanchor">[65]</a> and probably +owes his fame greatly to the kindly and discerning +mechanic. Says Galt, in his “Memoirs of Sir Benjamin +West” (London, 1816): “Towards his old friend, William +Henry, of Lancaster City, he always cherished the most<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">[232]</a></span> +grateful affection; he was the first who urged him to attempt +historical composition.”</p> + +<p>When, after the invention of Watt, the steam-engine +had taken such shape that it could really work the propelling +apparatus of a paddle or screw vessel, a new impetus +was given to the work of its adaptation. In France, the +Marquis de Jouffroy was one of the earliest to perceive that +the improvements of Watt, rendering the engine more compact, +more powerful, and, at the same time, more regular +and positive in its action, had made it, at last, readily applicable +to the propulsion of vessels. The brothers Périer +had imported a Watt engine from Soho, and this was attentively +studied by the marquis,<a name="FNanchor_66_66" id="FNanchor_66_66"></a><a +href="#Footnote_66_66" class="fnanchor">[66]</a> and its application to the +paddle-wheels of a steam-vessel seemed to him a simple +problem. Comte d’Auxiron and Chevalier Charles Mounin, +of Follenai, friends and companions of Jouffroy, were +similarly interested, and the three are said to have often +discussed the scheme together, and to have united in devising +methods of applying the new motor.</p> + +<p>In the year 1770, D’Auxiron determined to attempt the +realization of the plans which he had conceived. He resigned +his position in the army, prepared his plans and +drawings, and presented them to M. Bertin, the Prime +Minister, in the year 1771 or 1772. The Minister was favorably +impressed, and the King (May 22, 1772) granted +D’Auxiron a monopoly of the use of steam in river-navigation +for 15 years, provided he should prove his plans practicable, +and they should be so adjudged by the Academy.</p> + +<p>A company had been formed, the day previous, consisting +of D’Auxiron, Jouffroy, Comte de Dijon, the Marquis +d’Yonne, and Follenai, which advanced the requisite +funds. The first vessel was commenced in December, 1772. +When nearly completed, in September, 1774, the boat +sprung a leak, and, one night, foundered at the wharf.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">[233]</a></span> +After some angry discussion, during which d’Auxiron was +rudely, and probably unjustly, accused of bad faith, the +company declined to advance the money needed to recover +and complete the vessel. They were, however, compelled +by the court to furnish it; but, meantime, d’Auxiron died +of apoplexy, the matter dropped, and the company dissolved. +The cost of the experiment had been something +more than 15,000 francs.</p> + +<p>The heirs of d’Auxiron turned the papers of the deceased +inventor over to Jouffroy, and the King transferred +to him the monopoly held by the former. Follenai retained +all his interest in the project, and the two friends soon enlisted +a powerful adherent and patron, the Marquis Ducrest, +a well-known soldier, courtier, and member of the Academy, +who took an active part in the prosecution of the +scheme. M. Jacques Périer, the then distinguished mechanic, +was consulted, and prepared plans, which were +adopted in place of those of Jouffroy. The boat was built +by Périer, and a trial took place in 1774, on the Seine. +The result was unsatisfactory. The little craft could hardly +stem the sluggish current of the river, and the failure caused +the immediate abandonment of the scheme by Périer.</p> + +<p>Still undiscouraged, Jouffroy retired to his country +home, at Baume-les-Dames, on the river Doubs. There he +carried on his experiments, getting his work done as best +he could, with the rude tools and insufficient apparatus of a +village blacksmith. A Watt engine and a chain carrying +“duck-foot” paddles were his propelling apparatus. The +boat, which was about 14 feet long and 6 wide, was started +in June, 1776. The duck’s-foot system of paddles proved +unsatisfactory, and Jouffroy gave it up, and renewed his +experiments with a new arrangement. He placed on the +paddle-wheel shaft a ratchet-wheel, and on the piston-rod +of his engine, which was placed horizontally in the boat, +a double rack, into the upper and the lower parts of which +the ratchet-wheel geared. Thus the wheels turned in the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">[234]</a></span> +same direction, whichever way the piston was moving. +The new engine was built at Lyons in 1780, by Messrs. +Frères-Jean. The new boat was about 140 feet long and +14 feet wide; the wheels were 14 feet in diameter, their +floats 6 feet long, and the “dip,” or depth to which they +reached, was about 2 feet. The boat drew 3 feet of water, +and had a total weight of about 150 tons.</p> + +<p>At a public trial of the vessel at Lyons, July 15, 1783, +the little steamer was so successful as to justify the publication +of the fact by a report and a proclamation. The +fact that the experiment was not made at Paris was made +an excuse on the part of the Academy for withholding its +indorsement, and on the part of the Government for declining +to confirm to Jouffroy the guaranteed monopoly. Impoverished +and discouraged, Jouffroy gave up all hope of +prosecuting his plans successfully, and reëntered the army. +Thus France lost an honor which was already within her +grasp, as she had already lost that of the introduction of +the steam-engine, in the time of Papin.</p> + +<p>About 1785, John Fitch and James Rumsey were engaged +in experiments having in view the application of +steam to navigation.</p> + +<p>Rumsey’s experiments began in 1774, and in 1786 he +succeeded in driving a boat at the rate of four miles an hour +against the current of the Potomac at Shepherdstown, W. +Va., in presence of General Washington. His method of +propulsion has often been reinvented since, and its adoption +urged with that enthusiasm and persistence which is a peculiar +characteristic of inventors.</p> + +<p>Rumsey employed his engine to drive a great pump +which forced a stream of water aft, thus propelling the +boat forward, as proposed earlier by Bernouilli. This +same method has been recently tried again by the British +Admiralty, in a gunboat of moderate size, using a centrifugal +pump to set in motion the propelling stream, and with +some other modifications which are decided improvements<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">[235]</a></span> +upon Rumsey’s rude arrangements, but which have not +done much more than his toward the introduction of +“Hydraulic or Jet Propulsion,” as it is now called.</p> + +<p>In 1787 he obtained a patent from the State of Virginia +for steam-navigation. He wrote a treatise “On the Application +of Steam,” which was printed at Philadelphia, where +a Rumsey society was organized for the encouragement of +attempts at steam-navigation.</p> + +<p>Rumsey died of apoplexy, while explaining some of his +schemes before a London society a short time later, December +23, 1793, at the age of fifty years. A boat, then in +process of construction from his plans, was afterward tried +on the Thames, in 1793, and steamed at the rate of four +miles an hour. The State of Kentucky, in 1839, presented +his son with a gold medal, commemorative of his father’s +services “in giving to the world the benefit of the steamboat.”</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">John Fitch</span> was an unfortunate and eccentric, but very +ingenious, Connecticut mechanic. After roaming about +until forty years of age, he finally settled on the banks of +the Delaware, where he built his first steamboat.</p> + +<p>In April, 1785, as Fitch himself states, at Neshamony, +Bucks County, Pa., he suddenly conceived the idea that a +carriage might be driven by steam. After considering the +subject a few days, his attention was led to the plan of +using steam to propel vessels, and from that time to the +day of his death he was a persistent advocate of the introduction +of the steamboat. At this time, Fitch says, “I +did not know that there was a steam-engine on the earth;” +and he was somewhat disappointed when his friend, the +Rev. Mr. Irwin, of Neshamony, showed him a sketch of +one in “Martin’s Philosophy.”</p> + +<p>Fitch’s first model was at once built, and was soon after +tried on a small stream near Davisville. The machinery +was made of brass, and the boat was impelled by paddle-wheels. +A rough model of his steamboat was shown to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">[236]</a></span> +Dr. John Ewing, Provost of the University of Pennsylvania, +who, August 20, 1785, addressed a commendatory +letter to an ex-Member of Congress, William C. Houston, +asking him to assist Fitch in securing the aid of the General +Government. The latter referred the inventor, by a letter +of recommendation, to a delegate from New Jersey, Mr. +Lambert Cadwalader. With this, and other letters, Fitch +proceeded to New York, where Congress then met, and +made his application in proper form. He was unsuccessful, +and equally so in attempting to secure aid from the +Spanish minister, who desired that the profits should be +secured, by a monopoly of the invention, to the King of +Spain. Fitch declined further negotiation, determined +that, if successful at all, the benefit should accrue to his +own countrymen.</p> + +<p>In September, 1785, Fitch presented to the American +Philosophical Society, at Philadelphia, a model in which he +had substituted an endless chain and floats for the paddle-wheels, +with drawings and a descriptive account of his +scheme. This model is shown in the <a href="#Fig67">accompanying figure</a>.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig67" id="Fig67"></a> +<img src="images/illo263.png" alt="Fitch's Model" width="400" height="108" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 67.</span>—Fitch’s Model, 1785.</p></div> + +<p>In March, 1786, Fitch was granted a patent by the +State of New Jersey, for the exclusive right to the navigation +of the waters of the State by steam, for 14 years. A +month later, he was in Philadelphia, seeking a similar +patent from the State of Pennsylvania. He did not at once +succeed, but in a few days he had formed a company, raised +$300, and set about finding a place in which to construct +his engine. Henry Voight, a Dutch watchmaker, a good +mechanic, and a very ingenious man, took an interest in the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">[237]</a></span> +company, and with him Fitch set about his work with great +enthusiasm. After making a little model, having a steam-cylinder +but one inch in diameter, they built a model boat +and engine, the latter having a diameter of cylinder of three +inches. They tried the endless chain, and other methods of +propulsion, without success, and finally succeeded with a set +of oars worked by the engine. In August, 1786, it was determined +by the company to authorize the construction of a +larger vessel; but the money was not readily obtained. +Meantime, Fitch continued his efforts to secure a patent +from the State, and was finally, March 28, 1787, successful. +He also obtained a similar grant from the State of +Delaware, in February of the same year, and from New +York, March 19.</p> + +<p>Money was now subscribed more freely, and the work +on the boat continued uninterruptedly until May, 1787, +when a trial was made, which revealed many defects in the +machinery. The cylinder-heads were of wood, and leaked +badly; the piston leaked; the condenser was imperfect; +the valves were not tight. All these defects were remedied, +and a condenser invented by Voight—the “pipe-condenser”—was +substituted for that defective detail as previously +made.</p> + +<p>The steamboat was finally placed in working order, and +was found capable, on trial, of making three or four miles +an hour. But now the boiler proved to be too small to furnish +steam steadily in sufficient quantity to sustain the +higher speed. After some delay, and much distress on the +part of the sanguine inventor, who feared that he might be +at last defeated when on the very verge of success, the +necessary changes were finally made, and a trial took place +at Philadelphia, in presence of the members of the Convention—then +in session at Philadelphia framing the Federal +Constitution—August 22, 1787. Many of the distinguished +spectators gave letters to Fitch certifying his success. Fitch +now went to Virginia, where he succeeded in obtaining a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">[238]</a></span> +patent, November 7, 1787, and then returned to ask a patent +of the General Government.</p> + +<p>A controversy with Rumsey now followed, in which +Fitch asserted his claims to the invention of the steamboat, +and denied that Rumsey had done more than to revive the +scheme which Bernouilli, Franklin, Henry, Paine, and +others, had previously proposed, and that Rumsey’s <i>steamboat</i> +was not made until 1786.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig68" id="Fig68"></a> +<img src="images/illo265a.png" alt="Fitch and Voight's Boiler" width="291" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 68.</span>—Fitch and Voight’s Boiler, 1787.</p></div> + +<p>The boiler adopted in Fitch’s boat of 1787 was a “pipe-boiler,” +which he had described in a communication to the +Philosophical Society, in September, 1785. It consisted +(<a href="#Fig68">Fig. 68</a>) of a small water-pipe, winding backward and forward +in the furnace, and terminating at one end at the +point at which the feed-water was introduced, and at the +other uniting with the steam-pipe leading to the engine. +Voight’s condenser was similarly constructed. Rumsey +claimed that this boiler was copied from his designs. Fitch +brought evidence to prove that Rumsey had not built such +a boiler until after his own.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig69" id="Fig69"></a> +<img src="images/illo265b.png" alt="Fitch's First Boat" width="286" height="400" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 69.</span>—Fitch’s First Boat, 1787.</p></div> + +<p>Fitch’s first boat-engine had a steam-cylinder 12 inches +in diameter. A second engine was now built (1788) with a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_239" id="Page_239">[239]</a></span> +cylinder 18 inches in diameter, and a new boat. The first +vessel was 45 feet long and 12 feet wide; the new boat was +60 feet long and of but 8 feet breadth of beam. The first +boat (<a href="#Fig69">Fig. 69</a>) had paddles worked at the sides, with the +motion given the Indian paddle in propelling a canoe; in +the second boat (<a href="#Fig70">Fig. 70</a>) they were similarly worked, but +were placed at the stern. There were three of these paddles. +The boat was finally finished in July, 1788, and made +a trip to Burlington, 20 miles from Philadelphia. When +just reaching their destination, their boiler gave out, and +they made their return-trip to Philadelphia floating with +the tide. Subsequently, the boat made a number of excursions +on the Delaware River, making three or four miles an +hour.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig70" id="Fig70"></a> +<img src="images/illo266.png" alt="Fitch's Second Boat" width="422" height="300" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 70.</span>—John Fitch, 1788.</p></div> + +<p>Another of Fitch’s boats, in April, 1790, made seven +miles an hour. Fitch, writing of this boat, says that “on +the 16th of April we got our work completed, and tried +our boat again; and, although the wind blew very fresh at +the east, we reigned lord high admirals of the Delaware,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">[240]</a></span> +and no boat on the river could hold way with us.” In +June of that year it was placed as a passenger-boat on a +line from Philadelphia to Burlington, Bristol, Bordentown, +and Trenton, occasionally leaving that route to take excursions +to Wilmington and Chester. During this period, the +boat probably ran between 2,000 and 3,000 miles,<a name="FNanchor_67_67" +id="FNanchor_67_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_67_67" class="fnanchor">[67]</a> and with +no serious accident. During the winter of 1790-’91, Fitch +commenced another steamboat, the “Perseverance,” and +gave considerable time to the prosecution of his claim for a +patent from the United States. The boat was never completed, +although he received his patent, after a long and +spirited contest with other claimants, on the 26th of August, +1791, and Fitch lost all hope of success. He went to +France in 1793, hoping to obtain the privilege of building +steam-vessels there, but was again disappointed, and worked +his passage home in the following year.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig71" id="Fig71"></a> +<img src="images/illo267.png" alt="Fitch 1796" width="450" height="284" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 71.</span>—John Fitch, 1796.</p></div> + +<p>In the year 1796, Fitch was again in New York City, +experimenting with a little <i>screw</i> <a href="#Fig71">steamboat</a> on the “Collect” +Pond, which then covered that part of the city now<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">[241]</a></span> +occupied by the “Tombs,” the city prison. This little boat +was a ship’s yawl fitted with a screw, like that adopted later +by Woodcroft, and driven by a rudely-made engine.</p> + +<p>Fitch, while in the city of Philadelphia at about this +time, met Oliver Evans, and discussed with him the probable +future of steam-navigation, and proposed to form a +company in the West, to promote the introduction of steam +on the great rivers of that part of the country. He settled +at last in Kentucky, on his land-grant, and there amused +himself with a model steamboat, which he placed in a small +stream near Bardstown. His death occurred there in July, +1798, and his body still lies in the village cemetery, with +only a rough stone to mark the spot.</p> + +<p>Both Rumsey and Fitch endeavored to introduce their +methods in Great Britain; and Fitch, while urging the importance +and the advantages of his plan, confidently stated +his belief that the ocean would soon be crossed by steam-vessels, +and that the navigation of the Mississippi would +also become exclusively a steam-navigation. His reiterated +assertion, “The day will come when some more +powerful man will get fame and riches from my invention; +but no one will believe that poor John Fitch can do anything +worthy of attention,” now almost sounds like a +prophecy.</p> + +<p>During this period, an interest which had never diminished +in Great Britain had led to the introduction of experimental +steamboats in that country. <span class="smcap">Patrick Miller</span>, of +Dalswinton, had commenced experimenting, in 1786-’87, +with boats having double or triple hulls, and propelled by +paddle-wheels placed between the parts of the compound +vessel. James Taylor, a young man who had been engaged +as tutor for Mr. Miller’s sons, suggested, in 1787, the substitution +of steam for the manual power which had been, +up to that time, relied upon in their propulsion. Mr. Miller, +in 1787, printed a description of his plan of propelling +apparatus, and in it stated that he had “reason to believe<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">[242]</a></span> +that the power of the Steam-Engine may be applied to work +the wheels.”</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig72" id="Fig72"></a> +<img src="images/illo269.png" alt="Miller, Taylor and Symmington" width="400" height="309" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 72.</span>—Miller, Taylor, and Symmington, 1788.</p></div> + +<p>In the winter of 1787-’88, William Symmington, who +had planned a new form of steam-engine, and made a successful +working-model, was employed by Mr. Miller to construct +an engine for a new boat. This was built; the little engine, +having two cylinders of but four inches in diameter, was +placed on board, and a trial was made October 14, 1788. +The vessel (<a href="#Fig72">Fig. 72</a>) was 25 feet long, of 7 feet beam, and +made 5 miles an hour.</p> + +<p>In the year 1789, a large vessel was built, with an engine +having a steam-cylinder 18 inches in diameter, and this vessel +was ready for trial in November of that year. On the +first trial, the paddle-wheels proved too slight, and broke +down; they were replaced by stronger wheels, and, in December, +the boat, on trial, made seven miles an hour.</p> + +<p>Miller, like many other inventors, seems to have lost his +interest in the matter as soon as success seemed assured, +and dropped it to take up other incomplete plans. More +than a quarter of a century later, the British Government +gave Taylor a pension of £50 per annum, and, in 1837, his<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">[243]</a></span> +four daughters were each given a similar annuity. Mr. +Miller received no reward, although he is said to have expended +over £30,000. The engine of Symmington was +condemned by Miller as “the most improper of all steam-engines +for giving motion to a vessel.” Nothing more was +done in Great Britain until early in the succeeding century.</p> + +<p>In the United States, several mechanics were now at +work besides Fitch. Samuel Morey and Nathan Read were +among these. Nicholas Roosevelt was another. It had +just been found that American mechanics were able to do +the required shop-work. The first experimental steam-engine +built in America is stated to have been made in 1773 +by Christopher Colles, a lecturer before the American Philosophical +Society at Philadelphia. The first steam-cylinder +of any considerable size is said<a name="FNanchor_68_68" id="FNanchor_68_68"></a><a +href="#Footnote_68_68" class="fnanchor">[68]</a> to have been made by +Sharpe & Curtenius, of New York City.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Samuel Morey</span> was the son of one of the first settlers +of Orford, N. H. He was naturally fond of science and +mechanics, and became something of an inventor. He began +experimenting with the steamboat in 1790 or earlier, +building a small vessel, and fitting it with paddle-wheels +driven by a steam-engine of his own design, and constructed +by himself.<a name="FNanchor_69_69" id="FNanchor_69_69"></a><a +href="#Footnote_69_69" class="fnanchor">[69]</a> He made a trial-trip one Sunday morning in +the summer of 1790, a friend to accompany him, from Oxford, +up the Connecticut River, to Fairlee, Vt., a distance +of several miles, and returned safely. He then went to +New York, and spent the summer of each year until 1793 +in experimenting with his boat and modifications of his +engine. In 1793 he made a trip to Hartford, returning to +New York the next summer. His boat was a “stern-wheeler,” +and is stated to have been capable of steaming +five miles an hour. He next went to Bordentown, N. J., +where he built a larger boat, which is said to have been a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">[244]</a></span> +side-wheel boat, and to have worked satisfactorily. His +funds finally gave out, and he gave up his project after +having, in 1797, made a trip to Philadelphia. Fulton, +Livingston, and Stevens met Morey at New York, inspected +his boat, and made an excursion to Greenwich with him.<a name="FNanchor_70_70" id="FNanchor_70_70"></a><a +href="#Footnote_70_70" class="fnanchor">[70]</a> +Livingston is said<a name="FNanchor_71_71" id="FNanchor_71_71"></a><a href="#Footnote_71_71" class="fnanchor">[71]</a> +to have offered to assist Morey if he +should succeed in attaining a speed of eight miles an hour.</p> + +<p>Morey’s experiments seem to have been conducted very +quietly, however, and almost nothing is known of them. +The author has not been able to learn any particulars of +the engines used by him, and nothing definite is known of +the dimensions of either boat or machinery. Morey never, +like Fitch and Rumsey, sought publicity for his plans or +notoriety for himself.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Nathan Read</span>, who has already been <a href="#Read">mentioned</a>, a native +of Warren, Mass., where he was born in the year 1759, +and a graduate of Harvard College, was a student of medicine, +and subsequently a manufacturer of chain-cables and +other iron-work for ships. He invented, and in 1798 patented, +a nail-making machine. He was at one time (1800-1803) +a Member of Congress, and, later, a Justice of the +Court of Common Pleas, and Chief Justice in Hancock +County, Me., after his removal to that State in 1807. He +died in Belfast, Me., in 1849, at the age of ninety years.</p> + +<div class="figleft"><a name="Fig73" id="Fig73"></a> +<img src="images/illo272a.png" alt="Read's Boiler Section" width="170" height="400" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 73.</span>—Read’s Boiler in<br />Section, 1788.</p></div> + +<div class="figright"><a name="Fig74" id="Fig74"></a> +<img src="images/illo272b.png" alt="Read's Multi-Tubular Boiler" width="167" height="400" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 74.</span>—Read’s Multi-Tubular<br />Boiler, 1788.</p></div> + +<p>In the year 1788 he became interested in the problem +of steam-navigation, and learned something of the work of +Fitch. He first attempted to design a boiler that should be +strong, light, and compact, as well as safe. His first plan +was that of the “Portable Furnace-Boiler,” as he called it; +it was patented August 26, 1791. As designed, it consisted, +as seen in <a href="#Fig73">Figs. 73</a> and <a href="#Fig74">74</a>, which are reduced from his +patent drawings, of a shell of cylindrical form, like the +now common vertical tubular boiler. <i>A</i> is the furnace-door, +<i>B</i> a heater and feed-water reservoir, <i>D</i> a pipe leading<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">[245]</a></span> +the feed-water into the boiler,<a name="FNanchor_72_72" id="FNanchor_72_72"></a><a href="#Footnote_72_72" +class="fnanchor">[72]</a> <i>E</i> the smoke-pipe, and <i>F</i> +the steam-pipe leading to the engine. <i>G</i> is the “shell” of +the boiler, and <i>H</i> the fire-box. The crown-sheet, <i>I I</i>, has +depending from it, in the furnace, a set of water-tubes, <i>b b</i>, +closed at their lower ends, and another set, <i>a a</i>, which connect +the water-space above the furnace with the water-bottom, +<i>K K</i>. <i>L</i> is the furnace, and <i>M</i> the draught-space +between the boiler and the ash-pit, in which the grates +are set.</p> + +<p>This boiler was intended to be used in both steamboats +and steam-carriages. The first drawings were made in +1788 or 1789, as were those of a peculiar form of steam-engine +which also resembled very closely that afterward +constructed in Great Britain by Trevithick.<a name="FNanchor_73_73" id="FNanchor_73_73"></a><a href="#Footnote_73_73" +class="fnanchor">[73]</a> He built a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">[246]</a></span> +boat in 1789, which he fitted with paddle-wheels and a +crank, which was turned by hand, and, by trial, satisfied +himself that the system would work satisfactorily.</p> + +<p>He then applied for his patent, and spent the greater +part of the winter of 1789-’90 in New York, where Congress +then met, endeavoring to secure it. In January, 1791, +Read withdrew his petitions for patents, proposing to incorporate +accounts of new devices, and renewed them a few +months later. His patents were finally issued, dated August +26, 1791. John Fitch, James Rumsey, and John Stevens, +also, all received patents at the same date, for various +methods of applying steam to the propulsion of vessels.</p> + +<p>Read appears to have never succeeded in even experimentally +making his plans successful. He deserves credit +for his early and intelligent perception of the importance +of the subject, and for the ingenuity of his devices. As +the inventor of the vertical multi-tubular fire-box boiler, he +has also entitled himself to great distinction. This boiler +is now in very general use, and is a standard form.</p> + +<p>In 1792, Elijah Ormsbee, a Rhode Island mechanic, +assisted pecuniarily by David Wilkinson, built a small +steamboat at Winsor’s Cove, Narragansett Bay, and made +a successful trial-trip on the Seekonk River. Ormsbee +used an “atmospheric engine” and “duck’s-foot” paddles. +His boat attained a speed of from three to four miles an +hour.</p> + +<p>In Great Britain, Lord Dundas and William Symmington, +the former as the purveyor of funds and the latter as +engineer, followed by Henry Bell, were the first to make +the introduction of the steam-engine for the propulsion of +ships so completely successful that no interruption subsequently +took place in the growth of the new system of +water-transportation.</p> + +<p>Thomas, Lord Dundas, of Kerse, had taken great interest +in the experiments of Miller, and had hoped to be able +to apply the new motor on the Forth and Clyde Canal, in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">[247]</a></span> +which he held a large interest. After the failure of the +earlier experiments, he did not forget the matter; but subsequently, +meeting with Symmington, who had been Miller’s +constructing engineer, he engaged him to continue +the experiments, and furnished all required capital, about +£7,000. This was ten years after Miller had abandoned +his scheme.</p> + +<p>Symmington commenced work in 1801. The first boat +built for Lord Dundas, which has been claimed to have +been the “first practical steamboat,” was finished ready for +trial early in 1802. The vessel was called the “Charlotte +Dundas,” in honor of a daughter of Lord Dundas, who became +Lady Milton.</p> + +<p>The vessel (<a href="#Fig75">Fig. 75</a>) was driven by a Watt double-acting +engine, turning a crank on the paddle-wheel shaft. +The sectional sketch below exhibits the arrangement of the +machinery. <i>A</i> is the steam-cylinder, driving, by means of +the connecting-rod, <i>B C</i>, a stern-wheel, <i>E E</i>. <i>F</i> is the +boiler, and <i>G</i> the tall smoke-pipe. An air-pump and condenser, +<i>H</i>, is seen under the steam-cylinder.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig75" id="Fig75"></a> +<img src="images/illo274.png" alt="The 'Charlotte Dundas'" width="400" height="205" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 75.</span>—The “Charlotte Dundas,” 1801.</p></div> + +<p>In March, 1802, the boat was brought to Lock No. 20 +on the Forth and Clyde Canal, and two vessels of 70 tons +burden each taken in tow. Lord Dundas, William Symmington, +and a party of invited guests, were taken on board,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">[248]</a></span> +and the boat steamed down to Port Glasgow, a distance of +about 20 miles, against a strong head-wind, in six hours.</p> + +<p>The proprietors of the canal were now urged to adopt +the new plan of towing; but, fearing injury to the banks +of the canal, they declined to do so. Lord Dundas then +laid the matter before the Duke of Bridgewater, who gave +Symmington an order for eight boats like the Charlotte +Dundas, to be used on his canal. The death of the Duke, +however, prevented the contract from being carried into +effect, and Symmington again gave up the project in despair. +A quarter of a century later, Symmington received +from the British Government £100, and, a little later, £50 +additional, as an acknowledgment of his services. The +Charlotte Dundas was laid up, and we hear nothing more +of that vessel.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig76" id="Fig76"></a> +<img src="images/illo275.png" alt="The 'Comet'" width="400" height="279" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 76.</span>—The “Comet,” 1812.</p></div> + +<p>Among those who saw the Charlotte Dundas, and who +appreciated the importance of the success achieved by Symmington, +was <span class="smcap">Henry Bell</span>, who, 10 years afterward, constructed +the Comet (<a href="#Fig76">Fig. 76</a>), the first passenger-vessel +built<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">[249]</a></span> +in Europe. This vessel was built in 1811, and completed +January 18, 1812. The craft was of 30 tons burden, 40 feet +in length, and 10<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet breadth of beam. There were <i>two</i> +paddle-wheels on each side, driven by engines rated at +three horse-power.</p> + +<p>Bell had, it is said, been an enthusiastic believer in the +advantages to be secured by this application of steam, from +about 1786. In 1800, and again in 1803, he applied to the +British Admiralty for aid in securing those advantages by +experimentally determining the proper form and proportions +of machinery and vessel; but was not able to convince +the Admiralty of “the practicability and great utility +of applying steam to the propelling of vessels against +winds and tides, and every obstruction on rivers and seas +where there was depth of water.” He also wrote to the +United States Government, urging his views in a similar +strain.</p> + +<p>Bell’s boat was, when finished, advertised as a passenger-boat, +to leave Greenock, where the vessel was built, on +Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, for Glasgow, 24 miles +distant, returning Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. +The fare was made “four shillings for the best cabin, and +three shillings for the second.” It was some months before +the vessel became considered a trustworthy means of conveyance. +Bell, on the whole, was at first a heavy loser by +his venture, although his boat proved itself a safe, stanch +vessel.</p> + +<p>Bell constructed several other boats in 1815, and with +his success steam-navigation in Great Britain was fairly +inaugurated. In 1814 there were five steamers, all Scotch, +regularly working in British waters; in 1820 there were +34, one-half of which were in England, 14 in Scotland, and +the remainder in Ireland. Twenty years later, at the close +of the period to which this chapter is especially devoted, +there were about 1,325 steam-vessels in that kingdom, of +which 1,000 were English and 250 Scotch.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">[250]</a></span>But we must return to America, to witness the first and +most complete success, commercially, in the introduction of +the steamboat.</p> + +<p>The Messrs. Stevens, Livingston, Fulton, and Roosevelt +were there the most successful pioneers. The latter is said +to have built the “Polacca,” a small steamboat launched on +the Passaic River in 1798. The vessel was 60 feet long, +and had an engine of 20 inches diameter of cylinder and +2 feet stroke, which drove the boat 8 miles an hour, carrying +a party of invited guests, which included the Spanish +Minister. Livingston and John Stevens had induced Roosevelt +to try their plans still earlier,<a name="FNanchor_74_74" id="FNanchor_74_74"></a><a +href="#Footnote_74_74" class="fnanchor">[74]</a> paying the expense of +the experiments. The former adopted the plan of Bernouilli +and Rumsey, using a centrifugal pump to force a jet of +water from the stern; the latter used the screw. Livingston +going to France as United States Minister, Barlow +carried over the plans of the “Polacca,” and Roosevelt’s +friends state that a boat built by them, in conjunction with +Fulton, was a “sister-ship” to that vessel. In 1798, Roosevelt +patented a double engine, having cranks set at right +angles. As late as 1814 he received a patent for a steam-vessel, +fitted with paddle-wheels having adjustable floats. +His boat of 1798 is stated by some writers to have been +made by him on joint account of himself, Livingston, and +Stevens. Roosevelt, some years later, was again at work, +associating himself with Fulton in the introduction of +steam-navigation of the rivers of the West.<a name="FNanchor_75_75" id="FNanchor_75_75"></a><a +href="#Footnote_75_75" class="fnanchor">[75]</a></p> + +<p>In 1798, the Legislature of New York passed a law giving +Chancellor Livingston the exclusive right to steam-navigation +in the waters of the State for a period of 20 +years, <i>provided</i> that he should succeed, within a twelve-month, +in producing a boat that should steam four miles +an hour.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">[251]</a></span>Livingston did not succeed in complying with the terms +of the act, but, in 1803, he procured the reënactment of the +law in favor of himself and Robert Fulton, who was then +experimenting in France, after having, in England, watched +the progress of steam-navigation there, and then taken a +patent in this country.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port10" id="Port10"></a> +<img src="images/illo278.png" alt="Fulton" width="350" height="427" /> +<p class="caption">Robert Fulton.</p></div> + +<p><span class="smcap"><a href="#Port10">Robert Fulton</a></span> was a native of Little Britain, Lancaster +County, Pa., born 1765. He commenced experimenting +with paddle-wheels when a mere boy, in 1779, visiting an +aunt living on the bank of the Conestoga.<a name="FNanchor_76_76" id="FNanchor_76_76"></a><a +href="#Footnote_76_76" class="fnanchor">[76]</a> During his +youth he spent much of his time in the workshops of his +neighborhood, and learned the trade of a watchmaker; but +he adopted, finally, the profession of an artist, and exhibited +great skill in portrait-painting. While his tastes were<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">[252]</a></span> +at this time taking a decided bent, he is said to have visited +frequently the house of William Henry, already mentioned, +to see the paintings of Benjamin West, who in his youth +had been a kind of protégé of Mr. Henry; and he may +probably have seen there the model steamboats which Mr. +Henry exhibited, in 1783 or 1784, to the German traveler +Schöpff. In later years, Thomas Paine, the author of +“<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3755">Common Sense</a>,” at one time lived with Mr. Henry, and +afterward, in 1788, proposed that Congress take up the +subject for the benefit of the country.</p> + +<p>Fulton went to England when he came of age, and +studied painting with Benjamin West. He afterward +spent two years in Devonshire, where he met the Duke of +Bridgewater, who afterward so promptly took advantage +of the success of the “Charlotte Dundas.”</p> + +<p>While in England and in France—where he went in +1797, and resided some time—he may have seen something +of the attempts which were beginning to be made to introduce +steam-navigation in both of those countries.</p> + +<p>At about this time—perhaps in 1793—Fulton gave up +painting as a profession, and became a civil engineer. In +1797 he went to Paris, and commenced experimenting with +submarine torpedoes and torpedo-boats. In 1801 he had +succeeded so well with them as to create much anxiety in +the minds of the English, then at war with France.</p> + +<p>He had, as early as 1793, proposed plans for steam-vessels, +both to the United States and the British Governments, +and seems never entirely to have lost sight of the +subject.<a name="FNanchor_77_77" id="FNanchor_77_77"></a><a href="#Footnote_77_77" class="fnanchor">[77]</a> +While in France he lived with Joel Barlow, who +subsequently became known as a poet, and as Embassador +to France from the United States, but who was then engaged +in business in Paris.</p> + +<p>When about leaving the country, Fulton met Robert +Livingston (Chancellor Livingston, as he is often called),<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">[253]</a></span> +who was then (1801) Embassador of the United States at +the court of France. Together they discussed the project +of applying steam to navigation, and determined to attempt +the construction of a steamboat on the Seine; and in the +early spring of the year 1802, Fulton having attended Mrs. +Barlow to Plombières, where she had been sent by her physician, +he there made drawings and models, which were +sent or described to Livingston. In the following winter +Fulton completed a model side-wheel boat.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig77" id="Fig77"></a> +<img src="images/illo280.png" alt="Fulton's Experiments" width="442" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 77.</span>—Fulton’s Experiments.</p></div> + +<p>January 24, 1803, he delivered this model to MM. +Molar, Bordel, and Montgolfier, with a descriptive memoir, +in which he stated that he had, by experiment, proven that +side-wheels were better than the “chaplet” (paddle-floats +set on an endless chain).<a name="FNanchor_78_78" id="FNanchor_78_78"></a><a +href="#Footnote_78_78" class="fnanchor">[78]</a> These gentlemen were then +building for Fulton and Livingston their first boat, on +L’Isle des Cygnes, in the Seine. In planning this boat, Fulton<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">[254]</a></span> +had devised many different methods of applying steam +to its propulsion, and had made some experiments to determine +the resistance of fluids. He therefore had been +able to calculate, more accurately than had any earlier inventor, +the relative size and proportions of boat and machinery.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig78" id="Fig78"></a> +<img src="images/illo281.png" alt="Fulton's Table of Resistances" width="724" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 78.</span>—Fulton’s Table of Resistances.</p></div> + +<p>The author has examined a large collection of Fulton’s +drawings, among which are sketches, very neatly executed, +of many of these plans, including the chaplet, side-wheel, +and stern-wheel boats, driven by various forms of steam-engine, +some working direct, and some geared to the paddle-wheel +shaft. <a href="#Fig77">Figs. 77</a> and <a href="#Fig78">78</a> are engraved from +two of these sheets. The first represents the method +adopted by Fulton to determine the resistance of masses of +wood of various forms and proportions, when towed through +water. The other is “A Table of the resistance of bodies +moved through water, taken from experiments made in +England by a society for improving Naval architecture, between +the years 1793 and 1798” (<a href="#Fig78">Fig. 78</a>). This latter is +from a certified copy of “The Original Drawing on file in +the Office of the Clerk of the New York District, making +a part of the Demonstration of the patent granted to Robert +Fulton, Esqr., on the 11th day of February, 1809. Dated<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">[255]</a></span> +this 3rd March, 1814,” and is signed by Theron Rudd, Clerk +of the New York District. Resistances are given in pounds +per square foot.</p> + +<p>Guided by these experiments and calculations, therefore, +Fulton directed the construction of his vessel. It was completed +in the spring of 1803. But, unfortunately, the hull +of the little vessel was too weak for its heavy machinery, +and it broke in two and sank to the bottom of the Seine. +Undiscouraged, Fulton at once set about repairing damages. +He was compelled to direct the rebuilding of the +hull. The machinery was little injured. In June, 1803, +the reconstruction was completed, and the vessel was set +afloat in July. The hull was 66 feet long, of 8 feet beam, +and of light draught.</p> + +<p>August 9, 1803, this boat was cast loose, and steamed +up the Seine, in presence of an immense concourse of spectators. +A committee of the National Academy, consisting +of Bougainville, Bossuet, Carnot, and Périer, were present +to witness the experiment. The boat moved but slowly, +making only between 3 and 4 miles an hour against the +current, the speed through the water being about 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles; +but this was, all things considered, a great success.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig79" id="Fig79"></a> +<img src="images/illo283.png" alt="Barlow's Water-Tube Boiler" width="400" height="228" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 79.</span>—Barlow’s Water-Tube Boiler, 1793.</p></div> + +<p>The experiment was successful, but it attracted little +attention, notwithstanding the fact that its success had +been witnessed by the committee of the Academy and by +many well-known savants and mechanics, and by officers on +Napoleon’s staff. The boat remained a long time on the +Seine, near the palace. The water-tube boiler of this vessel +(<a href="#Fig79">Fig. 79</a>) is still preserved at the Conservatoire des Arts et +Métiers at Paris, where it is known as Barlow’s boiler. Barlow +patented it in France as early as 1793, as a steamboat-boiler, +and states that the object of his construction was to +obtain the greatest possible extent of heating-surface.</p> + +<p>Fulton endeavored to secure the pecuniary aid and the +countenance of the First Consul, but in vain.</p> + +<p>Livingston wrote home, describing the trial of this steamboat<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">[256]</a></span> +and its results, and procured the passage of an act by +the Legislature of the State of New York, extending a +monopoly granted him in 1798 for the term of 20 years +from April 5, 1803, the date of the new law, and extending +the time allowed for proving the practicability of driving +a boat four miles an hour by steam to two years from the +same date. A later act further extended the time to April, +1807.</p> + +<p>In May, 1804, Fulton went to England, giving up all +hope of success in France with either his steamboats or his +torpedoes. Fulton had already written to Boulton & Watt, +ordering an engine to be built from plans which he furnished +them; but he had not informed them of the purpose +to which it was to be applied. This engine was to have a +steam-cylinder 2 feet in diameter and of 4 feet stroke. The +engine of the Charlotte Dundas was of very nearly the +same size; and this fact, and the visit of Fulton to Symmington +in 1801, as described by the latter, have been made +the basis of a claim that Fulton was a copyist of the plans +of others. The general accordance of the dimensions of +his boat on the Seine with those of the “Polacca” of Roosevelt +is also made the basis of similar claims by the friends<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">[257]</a></span> +of the latter. It would appear, however, that Symmington’s +statement is incorrect, as Fulton was in France, experimenting +with torpedoes, at the time (July, 1801<a name="FNanchor_79_79" +id="FNanchor_79_79"></a><a href="#Footnote_79_79" class="fnanchor">[79]</a>) when +he is accused of having obtained from the English engineer +the dimensions and a statement of the performance of his +vessel. Yet a fireman employed by Symmington has made +an affidavit to the same statement. It is evident, however, +from what has preceded, that those inventors and builders +who were at that time working with the object of introducing +the steamboat were usually well acquainted with what +had been done by others, and with what was being done +by their contemporaries; and it is undoubtedly the fact +that each profited, so far as he was able, by the experience +of others.</p> + +<p>While in England, however, Fulton was certainly not +so entirely absorbed in the torpedo experiments with which +he was occupied in the years 1804-’6 as to forget his plans +for a steamboat; and he saw the engine ordered by him in +1804 completed in the latter year, and preceded it to New +York, sailing from Falmouth in October, 1806, and reaching +the United States December 13, 1806.</p> + +<p>The engine was soon received, and Fulton immediately +contracted for a hull in which to set it up. Meantime, Livingston +had also returned to the United States, and the two +enthusiasts worked together on a larger steamer than any +which had yet been constructed.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig80" id="Fig80"></a> +<img src="images/illo285a.png" alt="The Clermont" width="400" height="254" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 80.</span>—The Clermont, 1807.</p></div> + +<p>In the spring of 1807, the “Clermont” (<a href="#Fig80">Fig. 80</a>), as the +new boat was christened, was launched from the ship-yard of +Charles Brown, on the East River, New York. In August +the machinery was on board and in successful operation. +The hull of this boat was 133 feet long, 18 wide, and 9 +deep. The boat soon made a trip to Albany, running the +distance of 150 miles in 32 hours running time, and returning +in 30 hours. The sails were not used on either occasion.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">[258]</a></span></p> + +<p>This was the first voyage of considerable length ever +made by a steam-vessel; and Fulton, though not to be +classed with James Watt as an inventor, is entitled to the +great honor of having been the first to make steam-navigation +an every-day commercial success, and of having thus +made the first application of the steam-engine to ship-propulsion, +which was not followed by the retirement of the +experimenter from the field of his labors before success +was permanently insured.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig81" id="Fig81"></a> +<img src="images/illo285b.png" alt="Engine of the Clermont" width="600" height="264" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 81.</span>—Engine of the Clermont, 1808.</p></div> + +<p>The engine of the Clermont (<a href="#Fig81">Fig. 81</a>) +was of rather peculiar<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">[259]</a></span> +form, the piston, <i>E</i>, being coupled to the crank-shaft, +<i>O</i>, by a bell-crank, <i>I H P</i>, and a connecting-rod, <i>P Q</i>, the +paddle-wheel shaft, <i>M N</i>, being separate from the crank-shaft, +and connected with the latter by gearing, <i>O O</i>. The +cylinders were 24 inches in diameter by 4 feet stroke. The +paddle-wheels had buckets 4 feet long, with a dip of 2 feet. +Old drawings, made by Fulton’s own hand, and showing +the engine as it was in 1808, and the engine of a later +steamer, the Chancellor Livingston, are in the lecture-room +of the author at the Stevens Institute of Technology.</p> + +<p>The voyage of the Clermont to Albany was attended +by some ludicrous incidents, which found their counterparts +wherever, subsequently, steamers were for the first time +introduced. Mr. Colden, the biographer of Fulton, says +that she was described, by persons who had seen her passing +by night, “as a monster moving on the waters, defying +wind and tide, and breathing flames and smoke.”</p> + +<p>This first steamboat used dry pine wood for fuel, and +the flames rose to a considerable distance above the smoke-pipe. +When the fires were disturbed, mingled smoke and +sparks would rise high in the air. “This uncommon light,” +says Colden, “first attracted the attention of the crews of +other vessels. Notwithstanding the wind and tide were +averse to its approach, they saw with astonishment that it +was rapidly coming toward them; and when it came so +near that the noise of the machinery and paddles was +heard, the crews (if what was said in the newspapers of the +time be true), in some instances, shrank beneath their decks +from the terrific sight, and left their vessels to go on shore; +while others prostrated themselves, and besought Providence +to protect them from the approach of the horrible +monster which was marching on the tides, and lighting its +path by the fires which it vomited.”</p> + +<p>In the Clermont, Fulton used several of the now characteristic +features of the American river steamboat, and +subsequently introduced others. His most important and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">[260]</a></span> +creditable work, aside from that of the introduction of the +steamboat into every-day use, was the experimental determination +of the magnitude and the laws of ship-resistance, +and the systematic proportioning of vessel and machinery +to the work to be done by them.</p> + +<p>The success of the Clermont on the trial-trip was such +that Fulton soon after advertised the vessel as a regular +passenger-boat between New York and Albany.<a name="FNanchor_80_80" +id="FNanchor_80_80"></a><a href="#Footnote_80_80" class="fnanchor">[80]</a></p> + +<p>During the next winter the Clermont was repaired and +enlarged, and in the summer of 1808 was again on the +route to Albany; and, meantime, two new steamboats—the +Raritan and the Car of Neptune—had been built by Fulton. +In the year 1811 he built the Paragon. Both of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">[261]</a></span> +two vessels last named were of nearly double the size of the +Clermont. A steam ferry-boat was built to ply between +New York and Jersey City in 1812, and the next year two +others, to connect the metropolis with Brooklyn. These +were “twin-boats,” the two parallel hulls being connected +by a “bridge” or deck common to both. The Jersey ferry +was crossed in fifteen minutes, the distance being a mile +and a half. To-day, the time occupied at the same ferry +is about ten minutes. Fulton’s ferry-boat carried, at one +load, 8 carriages, and about 30 horses, and still had room +for 300 or 400 foot-passengers. Fulton also designed steam-vessels +for use on the Western rivers, and, in 1815, some of +his boats were started as “packets” on the line between +New York and Providence, R. I.</p> + +<p>Meantime, the War of 1812 was in progress, and Fulton +designed a steam vessel-of-war, which was then considered +a wonderfully formidable craft. His plans were submitted +to a commission of experienced naval officers, among whom +were Commodores Decatur and Perry, Captain John Paul +Jones, Captain Evans, and others whose names are still familiar, +and were favorably commended. Fulton proposed +to build a steam-vessel capable of carrying a heavy battery, +and of steaming four miles an hour. The ship was to be +fitted with furnaces for red-hot shot. Some of her guns +were to be discharged below the water-line. The estimated +cost was $320,000.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig82" id="Fig82"></a> +<img src="images/illo289.png" alt="Launch of the Fulton 1st" width="600" height="301" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 82.</span>—Launch of the “Fulton the First,” 1804.</p></div> + +<p>The construction of the vessel was authorized by Congress +in March, 1814; the keel was laid June 20, 1814, and +the vessel was <a href="#Fig82">launched</a> October 29th of the same year.</p> + +<p>The “Fulton the First,” as she was called, was considered +an enormous vessel at that time. The hull was double, 156 +feet long, 56 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, measuring 2,475 +tons. In the following May the ship was ready for her +engine, and in July was so far completed as to steam, on +a trial-trip, to the ocean at Sandy Hook and back—53 miles—in +8 hours and 20 minutes. In September of the same<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">[262]</a></span> +year, with armament and stores on board, the same route +was traversed again, the vessel making 5<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles an hour. +The vessel, as thus completed, had a double hull, each +about 20 feet longer than the Clermont, and separated by a +space 15 feet across. Her engine, having a steam-cylinder +48 inches in diameter and of 5 feet stroke of piston, was +furnished with steam by a copper boiler 22 feet long, 12 +feet wide, and 8 feet high, and turned a wheel between the +two hulls which was 16 feet in diameter, and carried +“floats” or “buckets” 14 feet long, and with a dip of 4 +feet. The engine was in one of the two hulls, and the +boiler in the other. The sides, at the gun-deck, were 4 feet +10 inches thick, and her spar-deck was surrounded by heavy +musket-proof bulwarks. The armament consisted of 30 +32-pounders, which were intended to discharge red-hot +shot. There was one heavy mast for each hull, fitted with +large latteen sails. Each end of each hull was fitted with +a rudder. Large pumps were carried, which were intended +to throw heavy streams of water upon the decks of the enemy, +with a view to disabling the foe by wetting his ordnance +and ammunition. A submarine gun was to have +been carried at each bow, to discharge shot weighing 100 +pounds, at a depth of 10 feet below the water-line.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">[263]</a></span>This was the first application of the steam-engine to +naval purposes, and, for the time, it was an exceedingly +creditable one. Fulton, however, did not live to see the +ship completed. He was engaged in a contest with Livingston, +who was then endeavoring to obtain permission +from the State of New Jersey to operate a line of steamboats +in the waters of the Hudson River and New York +Bay, and, while returning from attending a session of the +Legislature at Trenton, in January, 1815, was exposed to +the weather on the bay at a time when he was ill prepared +to withstand it. He was taken ill, and died February 24th of +that year. His death was mourned as a national calamity.</p> + +<p>From the above brief sketch of this distinguished man +and his work, it is seen that, although Robert Fulton is not +entitled to distinction as an inventor, he was one of the +ablest, most persistent, and most successful of those who +have done so much for the world by the introduction of the +inventions of others. He was an intelligent engineer and +an enterprising business-man, whose skill, acuteness, and +energy have given the world the fruits of the inventive +genius of all who preceded him, and have thus justly +earned for him a fame that can never be lost.</p> + +<p>Fulton had some active and enterprising rivals.</p> + +<p>Oliver Evans had, in 1801 or 1802, sent one of his engines, +of about 150 horse-power, to New Orleans, for the +purpose of using it to propel a vessel owned by Messrs. +McKeever and Valcourt, which was there awaiting it. The +engine was actually set up in the boat, but at a low stage +of the river, and no trial could be made until the river +should again rise, some months later. Having no funds to +carry them through so long a period, Evans’s agents were +induced to remove the engine again, and to set it up in a +saw-mill, where it created great astonishment by its extraordinary +performance in sawing lumber.</p> + +<p>Livingston and Roosevelt were also engaged in experiments +quite as early as Fulton, and perhaps earlier.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">[264]</a></span>The prize gained by Fulton was, however, most closely +contested by Colonel <span class="smcap">John Stevens</span>, of Hoboken, who has +been <a href="#Stevens">already mentioned</a> in connection with the early history +of railroads, and who had been since 1791 engaged in +similar experiments. In 1789 he had petitioned the Legislature +of the State of New York for a grant similar to that +accorded to Livingston, and he then stated that his plans +were complete, and on paper.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig83" id="Fig83"></a> +<img src="images/illo291.png" alt="Section of Steam-Boiler" width="350" height="220" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 83.</span>—Section of Steam-Boiler, 1804.</p></div> + +<p>In 1804, while Fulton was in Europe, Stevens had completed +a steamboat, 68 feet long and of 14 feet beam, which +combined novelties and merits of design in a manner that +exhibited the best possible evidence of remarkable inventive +talent, as well as of the most perfect appreciation of the +nature of the problem which he had proposed to himself to +solve. Its boiler (<a href="#Fig83">Fig. 83</a>) was of what is now known as the +water-tubular variety. It was quite similar to some now +known as sectional boilers, and contained 100 tubes 2 inches +in diameter and 18 inches long, each fastened at one end to +a central water-leg and steam-drum, and plugged at the +other end. The flames from the furnace passed around and +among the tubes, the water being inside them. The engine +(<a href="#Fig84">Fig. 84</a>) was a <i>direct-acting high-pressure</i> condensing engine, +having a 10-inch cylinder, 2 feet stroke of piston, and +drove a <i>screw</i> having four blades, and of a form which, even +to-day, appears quite good. The whole is a most remarkable +piece of early engineering.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig84" id="Fig84"></a> +<img src="images/illo292a.png" alt="Stevens's Engine, Boiler, Screw-Propeller" width="500" height="281" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 84.</span>—Engine, Boiler, and Screw-Propellers used by Stevens, 1804.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">[265]</a></span>A model of this little steamer, built in 1804, is preserved +in the lecture-room of the Department of Mechanical Engineering +at the Stevens Institute of Technology; and the +machinery itself, consisting of the high-pressure “sectional” +or “safety” tubular boiler, as it would be called to-day, the +high-pressure condensing engine, with rotating valves, and +twin screw-propellers, as just described, is given a place of +honor in the model-room, or museum, where it contrasts +singularly with the mechanism contributed to the collection +by manufacturers and inventors of our own time. The hub +and blade of a single screw, also used with the same machinery, +is likewise to be seen there.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig85" id="Fig85"></a> +<img src="images/illo292b.png" alt="Stevens's Screw Steamer" width="500" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 85.</span>—Stevens’s Screw Steamer, 1804.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">[266]</a></span>Stevens seems to have been the first to fully recognize +the importance of the principle involved in the construction +of the sectional steam-boiler. His eldest son, John Cox +Stevens, was in Great Britain in the year 1805, and, while +there, patented another modification of this type of boiler. +In his specification, he details both the method of construction +and the principles which determine its form. He says +that he describes this invention as it was made known to +him by his father, and adds:</p> + +<p>“From a series of experiments made in France, in 1790, +by M. Belamour, under the auspices of the Royal Academy +of Sciences, it has been found that, within a certain range +the elasticity of steam is nearly doubled by every addition +of temperature equal to 30° of Fahrenheit’s thermometer. +These experiments were carried no higher than 280°, at +which temperature the elasticity of steam was found equal +to about four times the pressure of the atmosphere. By +experiments which have lately been made by myself, the +elasticity of steam at the temperature of boiling oil, which +has been estimated at about 600°, was found to equal 40 +times the pressure of the atmosphere.</p> + +<p>“To the discovery of this principle or law, which obtains +when water assumes a state of vapor, I certainly +can lay no claim; but to the application of it, upon certain +principles, to the improvement of the steam-engine, I do +claim exclusive right.</p> + +<p>“It is obvious that, to derive advantage from an application +of this principle, it is absolutely necessary that +the vessel or vessels for generating steam should have +strength sufficient to withstand the great pressure from an +increase of elasticity in the steam; but this pressure is increased +or diminished in proportion to the capacity of the +containing vessel. The principle, then, of this invention +consists in forming a boiler by means of a system, or combination +of a number of small vessels, instead of using, as +in the usual mode, one large one; the relative strength of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">[267]</a></span> +the materials of which these vessels are composed increasing +in proportion to the diminution of capacity. It will +readily occur that there are an infinite variety of possible +modes of effecting such combinations; but, from the nature +of the case, there are certain limits beyond which it becomes +impracticable to carry on improvement. In the boiler I am +about to describe, I apprehend that the improvement is carried +to the utmost extent of which the principle is capable. +Suppose a plate of brass of one foot square, in which a +number of holes are perforated; into each of which holes is +fixed one end of a copper tube, of about an inch in diameter +and two feet long; and the other ends of these tubes +inserted in like manner into a similar piece of brass; the +tubes, to insure their tightness, to be cast in the plates; +these plates are to be inclosed at each end of the pipes by +a strong cap of cast-iron or brass, so as to leave a space of +an inch or two between the plates or ends of the pipes and +the cast-iron cap at each end; the caps at each end are to +be fastened by screw-bolts passing through them into the +plates; the necessary supply of water is to be injected by +means of a forcing-pump into the cap at one end, and +through a tube inserted into the cap at the other end the +steam is to be conveyed to the cylinder of the steam-engine; +the whole is then to be encircled in brickwork or masonry +in the usual manner, placed either horizontally or perpendicularly, +at option.</p> + +<p>“I conceive that the boiler above described embraces +the most eligible mode of applying the principle before +mentioned, and that it is unnecessary to give descriptions +of the variations in form and construction that may be +adopted, especially as these forms may be diversified in +many different modes.”</p> + +<p>Boilers of the character of those described in the specification +given above were used on the locomotive built by +John Stevens in 1824-’25, and one of them remains in the +collections of the Stevens Institute of Technology.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">[268]</a></span>The use of such a boiler 70 years ago is even more remarkable +than the adoption of the screw-propeller, in such +excellent proportions, 30 years before the labors of Smith +and of Ericsson brought the screw into general use; and +we have, in this strikingly original combination, as good +evidence of the existence of unusual engineering talent in +this great engineer as we found of his political and statesmanlike +ability in his efforts to forward the introduction of +railways.</p> + +<p>Colonel John Stevens designed a peculiar form of iron-clad +in the year 1812, which has been since reproduced by +no less distinguished and successful an engineer than the +late John Elder, of Glasgow, Scotland. It consisted of a +saucer-shaped hull, carrying a heavy battery, and plated +with iron of ample thickness to resist the shot fired from +the heaviest ordnance then known. This vessel was secured +to a swivel, and was anchored in the channel to be defended. +A set of screw-propellers, driven by steam-engines, and situated +beneath the vessel, where they were safe against +injury by shot, were so arranged as to permit the vessel to +be rapidly revolved about its centre. As each gun was +brought into line of fire, it was discharged, and was then +reloaded before coming around again. This was probably +the earliest embodiment of the now well-established “Monitor” +principle. It was probably the first iron-clad ever +designed. It has recently been again brought out and introduced +into the Russian navy, and is there called the +“Popoffka.”</p> + +<p>The first of Stevens’s boats performed so well, that he +immediately built another one, using the same engine as +before, but employing a larger boiler, and propelling the +vessel by <i>twin screws</i>, the latter being another instance of +his use of a device brought forward long afterward as new, +and frequently adopted. This boat was sufficiently successful +to prove the practicability of making steam-navigation a +commercial success; and Stevens, assisted by his sons, built<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">[269]</a></span> +a boat which he named the “Phœnix,” and made the first +trial in 1807, but just too late to anticipate Fulton. This +boat was driven by paddle-wheels.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig86" id="Fig86"></a> +<img src="images/illo296.png" alt="Stevens's Twin-Screw Steamer" width="500" height="278" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 86.</span>—Stevens’s Twin-Screw Steamer, 1805.</p></div> + +<p>The Phœnix, being shut out of the waters of the State +of New York by the monopoly held by Fulton and Livingston, +was used for a time between New York and New +Brunswick, and then, anticipating a better pecuniary return, +it was concluded to send her to Philadelphia, to ply on the +Delaware.</p> + +<p>At that time no canal offered the opportunity to make +an inland passage; and in June, 1808, Robert L. Stevens, +a son of John, started with her to make the passage by sea. +Although meeting a gale of wind, he arrived at Philadelphia +safely, having been the first to trust himself on the +open sea in a vessel relying entirely upon steam-power.</p> + +<p>From this time forward the Stevenses, father and sons, +continued to construct steam-vessels; and, after the breaking +down of the Fulton monopoly by the courts, they built +the most successful steamboats that ran on the Hudson +River.</p> + +<p>After Fulton and Stevens had thus led the way, steam-navigation +was introduced very rapidly on both sides of the +ocean; and on the Mississippi the number of boats set afloat +was soon large enough to fulfill Evans’s prediction that the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">[270]</a></span> +navigation of that river would ultimately be effected by +steam-vessels.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port11" id="Port11"></a> +<img src="images/illo297.png" alt="R. L. Stevens" width="350" height="444" /> +<p class="caption">Robert L. Stevens.</p></div> + +<p>The changes and improvements which, during the 20 +years succeeding the time of Fulton and of John Stevens, +gradually led to the adoption of the now recognized type +of “American river-boat” and its steam-engine, were principally +made by that son of the senior Stevens, who has +already been mentioned—<span class="smcap"><a href="#Port11">Robert L. Stevens</a></span>—and who +became known later as the designer and builder of the first +well-planned iron-clad ever constructed, the Stevens Battery. +Much of his best work was done during his father’s +lifetime.</p> + +<p>He made many extended and most valuable, as well +as interesting, experiments on ship-propulsion, expending +much time and large sums of money upon them; and many +years before they became generally understood, he had arrived<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">[271]</a></span> +at a knowledge not only of the laws governing the +variation of resistance at excessive speeds, but he had determined, +and had introduced into his practice, those forms +of least resistance and those graceful water-lines which have +only recently distinguished the practice of other successful +naval architects.</p> + +<p>Referring to his invaluable services, President King, +who seems to have been the first to thoroughly appreciate +the immense amount of original invention and the surprising +excellence of the engineering of this family, in a lecture +delivered in New York in 1851, gave, for the first time, a +connected and probably accurate description of their work, +upon which nearly all later accounts have been based.</p> + +<p>Young Stevens began working in his father’s machine-shop +in 1804 or 1805, when a mere boy, and thus acquired +at a very early age that familiarity with practical details of +work and of business which is essential to perfect success. +It was he who introduced the now common “hollow water-line” +in the Phœnix, and thus anticipated the claims of the +builders of the once famous “Baltimore clippers,” and of +the inventors of the “wave-line” form of vessels. In the +same vessel he adopted a feathering paddle-wheel and the +guard-beam now universally seen in our river steamboats.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig87" id="Fig87"></a> +<img src="images/illo299.png" alt="Feathering Paddle-Wheel" width="408" height="400" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 87.</span>—The Feathering Paddle-Wheel.</p></div> + +<p>As usually constructed, this arrangement of float is as +shown in <a href="#Fig87">Fig. 87</a>. The rods, <i>F F</i>, connect the eccentrically-set +collar, <i>G</i>, carried on <i>H</i>, a pin mounted on the paddle-beam +outside the wheel, or an eccentric secured to the +vessel, with the short arms, <i>D D</i>, by which the paddles are +turned upon the pins, <i>E E</i>. <i>A</i> is the centre of the paddle-wheel, +and <i>C C</i> are arms. Circular hoops, or bands, connect +all of the arms, each of which carries a float. They +are all thus tied together, forming a very firm and powerful +combination to resist external forces.</p> + +<p>The steamboat Philadelphia was built in the year 1813, +and the young naval architect took advantage of the opportunity +to introduce several new devices, including screw-bolts<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">[272]</a></span> +in place of tree-nails, and diagonal knees of wood and +of iron. Two years later he altered the engines of this boat, +and arranged them to work steam expansively. A little +later he commenced using anthracite coal, which had been +discovered in 1791 by Philip Ginter, and introduced at +Wilkesbarre, Pa., in the smith-shops, some years before the +Revolution. It had been used in a peculiar grate devised by +Judge Fell, of that town, in 1808. Oliver Evans also had +used it in stoves even earlier than the latter date, and at +about the same time it had been used in the blast-furnace<a name="FNanchor_81_81" +id="FNanchor_81_81"></a><a href="#Footnote_81_81" class="fnanchor">[81]</a> +at Kingston. Stevens was the first of whom we have record +who was thoroughly successful in using, as a steam-coal, +the new and almost unmanageable fuel. He fitted up the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">[273]</a></span> +boiler of the steamboat Passaic for it in 1818, and adopted +anthracite as a steaming-coal. He used it in a cupola-furnace +in the same year, and its use then rapidly became general +in the Eastern States.</p> + +<p>Stevens continued his work of improving the beam-engine +for many years. He designed the now universally-used +“skeleton-beam,” which is one of the characteristic features +of the American engine, and placed the first example of this +light and elegant, yet strong, construction on the steamer +Hoboken in the year 1822. He built the Trenton, which was +then considered an extraordinarily powerful, fast, and handsome +vessel, two years afterward, and placed the two boilers +on the guards—a custom which is still general on the river +steamboats of the Eastern States. In this vessel he also +adopted the plan of making the paddle-wheel floats in two +parts, placing one above the other, and securing the upper +half on the forward and the lower half on the after side of +the arm, thus obtaining a smoother action of the wheel, +and less loss by oblique pressures.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig88" id="Fig88"></a> +<img src="images/illo301.png" alt="The North America and The Albany" width="585" height="269" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 88.</span>—The North America and Albany, 1827-’30.</p></div> + +<p>In 1827 he built the North America (<a href="#Fig88">Fig. 88</a>), one of +his largest and most successful steamers, a vessel fitted with +a pair of engines each 44<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter of cylinder +and 8 feet stroke of piston, making 24 revolutions per minute, +driving the boat 15 to 16 miles an hour. Anticipating +difficulty in keeping the long, light, shallow vessel in shape +when irregularly laden, and when steaming at the high +speed expected to be obtained when her powerful engine +was exerting its maximum effort, he adopted the expedient +of stiffening the hull by means of a truss of simple form. +This proved thoroughly satisfactory, and the “hog-frame,” +as it has since been inelegantly but universally called, is +still one of the peculiar features of every American river-steamer +of any considerable size. It was in the North +America, also, that he first introduced the artificial blast +for forcing the fires, which is still another detail of now +usual practice.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">[274]</a></span></p> + +<p>Stevens next turned his attention to the engine again, +and adopted spring bearings under the paddle-shaft of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">[275]</a></span> +New Philadelphia in 1828, and fitted the steam-cylinder +with the “double-poppet” valve, which is now universally +used on beam-engines. This consists of two disk-valves, +connected by the valve-spindle. The disks are of unequal +sizes, the smaller passing through the seat of the larger. +When seated, the pressure of the steam is, in the steam-valve, +taken on the upper side of the larger and the lower +side of the smaller disk, thus producing a partial balancing +of the valve, and rendering it easy to work the heaviest engine +by the hand-gear. The two valve-seats are formed in +the top and the bottom, respectively, of the steam-passage +leading to the cylinder; and when the valve is raised, the +steam enters at the top and the bottom at the same time, +and the two currents, uniting, flow together into the steam-cylinder. +The same form of valve is used as an exhaust-valve.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig89" id="Fig89"></a> +<img src="images/illo302.png" alt="Stevens's Return Tubular Boiler" width="391" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 89.</span>—Stevens’s Return Tubular Boiler, 1832.</p></div> + +<p>At about the same time he built the now standard form +of return tubular boilers for moderate pressures. In the +<a href="#Fig89">figure</a>, <i>S</i> is the steam and <i>W</i> the water space, and <i>F</i> the +furnace. The direction of the currents of smoke and gas +are shown by the arrows.</p> + +<p>Some years later (1840), Stevens commenced using +steam-packed pistons on the Trenton, in which steam was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">[276]</a></span> +admitted by self-adjusting valves behind the metallic packing-rings, +setting them out more effectively than did the +steel springs then (and still) usually employed.</p> + +<p>His pistons, thus fitted, worked well for many years. A +set of the small brass check-valves used in a piston of this +kind, built by Stevens, and preserved in the cabinets of the +Stevens Institute of Technology, are good evidence of the +ingenuity and excellent workmanship which distinguished +the machinery constructed under the direction of this great +engineer.</p> + +<div class="figleft"><a name="Fig90" id="Fig90"></a> +<img src="images/illo303.png" alt="Stevens's Valve-Motion" width="300" height="271" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 90.</span>—Stevens’s Valve-Motion.</p></div> + +<p>The now familiar “Stevens cut-off,” a peculiar device +for securing the expansion of steam in the steam-cylinder, +was the invention (1841) of Robert L. Stevens and a nephew, +who inherited the same constructive talent which distinguished +the first of these great men—Mr. Francis B. Stevens. +In this form of valve-gear, the steam and exhaust +valves are independently worked by separate eccentrics, the +latter being set in the usual manner, opening and closing +the exhaust-passages just before the crank passes its centre. +The steam-eccentric is so placed that the steam-valve is +opened as usual, but closed when but about one-half the +stroke has been made. This result is accomplished by giving +the eccentric a greater throw than +is required by the motion of the valve, +and permitting it to move through a +portion of its path without moving the +valve. Thus, in <a href="#Fig90">Fig. 90</a>, if <i>A B</i> be the +direction of motion of the eccentric-rod, +the valve would ordinarily open +the steam-port when the eccentric assumes +the position <i>O C</i>, closing when +the eccentric has passed around to <i>O D</i>. With the Stevens +valve-gear, the valve is opened when the eccentric reaches +<i>O E</i>, and closes when it arrives at <i>O F</i>. The steam-valve +of the opposite end of the cylinder is open while the eccentric +is moving from <i>O M</i> to <i>O K</i>. Between <i>K</i> and <i>E</i>, +and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">[277]</a></span> +between <i>F</i> and <i>M</i>, both valves are seated. <i>H B</i> is proportional +to the lift of the valve, and <i>O H</i> to the motion of +the valve-gear when out of contact with the valve-lifters. +While the crank is moving through an arc, <i>E F</i>, steam is +entering the cylinder; from <i>F</i> to <i>M</i> the steam is expanding. +At <i>M</i> the stroke is completed, and the other steam-valve +opens. The ratio <span class="enum">E M</span>∕<span class="denom">E L</span> is the ratio of expansion.</p> + +<p>This form of cut-off motion is still a very usual one, +and can be seen in nearly all steamers in the United States +not using the device of Sickles. It was at about this time, +also, that Stevens, having succeeded his father in the business +of introducing the steam-engine in land-transportation, +as well as on the water, adopted the use of steam expansively +on the locomotives of the Camden & Amboy Railroad, +which was controlled and built by capital furnished principally +by the Messrs. Stevens. He at the same time constructed +eight-wheeled engines for heavy work, and adopted +anthracite coal as fuel. In the latter change he was thoroughly +successful, and the same improvement was made +with engines built for fast traffic in 1848.</p> + +<p>The most remarkable of all the applications of steam-power +proposed by Robert L. Stevens was that known as +the Stevens Steam Iron-Clad Battery. As has already been +stated, Colonel John Stevens had proposed, as early as 1812, +to build a circular or saucer-shaped iron-clad, like those +built 60 years later for the Russian Navy. Nothing was +done, however, although the son revived the idea in a modified +form 20 years afterward. In the years 1813-’14, the +war with England being then in progress, he invented, +after numerous and hazardous experiments, an <i>elongated +shell</i>, to be fired from ordinary smooth-bored cannon. Having +perfected this invention, he sold the secret to the +United States, after making experiments to prove their destructiveness +so decisive as to leave no doubt of the efficacy +of such projectiles.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">[278]</a></span>As early as 1837 he had perfected a plan of an iron-clad +war-vessel, and in August, 1841, his brothers, James C. and +Edwin A. Stevens, representing Robert L., addressed a +letter to the Secretary of the Navy, proposing to build an +iron-clad vessel of high speed, with all its machinery below +the water-line, and having submerged screw-propellers. +The armament was to consist of the most powerful rifled +guns, loading at the breech, and provided with elongated +shot and shell. In the year 1842, having contracted to build +for the United States Government a large war-steamer on +this plan, which should be shot and shell proof, Robert L. +Stevens built a steamboat at Bordentown, for the sole purpose +of experimenting on the forms and curves of propeller-blades, +as compared with side-wheels, and continued his experiments +for many months. After some delay, during +which Mr. Stevens and his brothers were engaged with their +experiments and in perfecting their plans, the keel of an +iron-clad was laid down in a dry-dock which had been constructed +for the purpose at great cost. This vessel was to +have been 250 feet long, of 40 feet beam, and 28 feet deep. +The machinery was designed to furnish 700 indicated horse-power. +The plating was proposed to be 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches thick—the +same thickness of armor as was adopted 10 years later +by the French for their comparatively rude constructions.</p> + +<p>In 1854, such marked progress had been made in the +construction of ordnance that Mr. Stevens was no longer +willing to proceed with the original plans, fearing that, +were the ship completed, it might prove not invulnerable, +and might throw some discredit upon its designer, as well +as upon the navy of which it was to form a part. The +work, which had, in those years of peace, progressed very +slowly and intermittently, was therefore stopped entirely, +the vessel given up, and in 1854 the keel of a ship of vastly +greater size and power was laid down. The new design +was 415 feet long, of 45 feet beam, and of something over +5,000 tons displacement. The thickness of armor proposed<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">[279]</a></span> +was 6<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> +inches—2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> inches thicker than that of the first +French and British iron-clads—and the machinery was designed +by Mr. Stevens to be of 8,624 indicated horse-power, +driving twin-screws, and propelling the vessel 20 miles or +more an hour. As with the preceding design, the progress +of construction was intermittent and very slow. Government +advanced funds, and then refused to continue the +work; successive administrations alternately encouraged +and discouraged the engineer; and he finally, cutting loose +entirely from all official connections, went on with the work +at his own expense.</p> + +<p>The remarkable genius of the elder Stevens was well +reflected in the character of his son, and is in no way better +exemplified than by the accuracy with which, in this great +ship, those forms and proportions, both of hull and machinery, +were adopted which are now, twenty-five years later, +recognized as most correct under similar conditions. The +lines of the vessel are beautifully fair and fine, and are what +J. Scott Russell has called “wave-lines,” or trochoidal lines, +such as Rankine has shown to be the best possible for easy +propulsion. The proportion of length to midship dimensions +is such as to secure the speed proposed with a minimum +resistance, and to accord closely with the proportions +arrived at and adopted by common consent in present +transoceanic navigation by the best—not to say radical—builders.</p> + +<p>The death of Robert L. Stevens occurred in April, 1856, +when this larger vessel had advanced so far toward completion +that the hull and machinery were practically finished, +and it only remained to add the armor-plating, and to decide +upon the form of fighting-house and upon the number +and size of guns. The construction of the vessel, which had +proceeded slowly and intermittently during the years of +peace, as successive administrations had considered it necessary +to continue the payment of appropriations, or had +stopped temporarily in the absence of any apparent immediate<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">[280]</a></span> +necessity for continuance of the work, was again interrupted +by his death.</p> + +<p>The name of Robert L. Stevens will be long remembered +as that of one of the greatest of American mechanics, the +most intelligent of naval architects, and as the first, and +one of the greatest, of those to whom we are indebted for +the commencement of the mightiest of revolutions in the +methods and implements of modern naval warfare. American +mechanical genius and engineering skill have rarely +been too promptly recognized, and no excuse will be required +for an attempt (which it is hoped may yet be made) +to place such splendid work as that of the Messrs. Stevens +in a light which shall reveal both its variety and extent and +its immense importance.</p> + +<p>While Fulton was introducing the steamboat upon the +waters of New York Bay and the Hudson River, and while +the Stevenses, father and sons, were rapidly bringing out a +fleet of steamers on the Delaware River and Bay, other +mechanics were preparing to contest the field with them as +opportunity offered, and as legislative acts authorizing monopoly +expired by limitation or were repealed.</p> + +<p>About 1821, Robert L. Thurston, John Babcock, and +Captain Stephen T. Northam, of Newport, R. I., commenced +building steamboats, beginning with a small craft +intended for use at Slade’s Ferry, on an arm of Narragansett +Bay, near Fall River. They afterward built vessels to +ply on Long Island Sound. One of their earliest boats was +the Babcock, built at Newport in 1826. The engine was +built by Thurston and Babcock, at Portsmouth, R. I. +They were assisted in their work by Richard Sanford, and +with funds by Northam. The engine was of 10 or 12 +inches diameter of cylinder, and 3 or 4 feet stroke of piston. +The boiler was a form of “pipe-boiler,” subsequently +(1824) patented by Babcock. The water used was injected +into the hot boiler as fast as required to furnish steam, no +water being retained in the steam-generator. This boat<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">[281]</a></span> +was succeeded, in 1827-’28, by a larger vessel, the Rushlight, +for which the engine was built by James P. Allaire, +at New York, while the boat was built at Newport. The +boilers of both vessels had tubes of cast-iron. The smaller +of these boats was of 80 tons burden; it steamed from +Newport to Providence, 30 miles, in 3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> hours, and to New +York, a distance of 175 miles, in 25 hours, using 1<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> cord +of wood.<a name="FNanchor_82_82" id="FNanchor_82_82"></a><a href="#Footnote_82_82" class="fnanchor">[82]</a> +Thurston and Babcock subsequently removed +to Providence, where the latter soon died. Thurston continued +to build steam-engines at this place until nearly a +half-century later, dying in 1874.<a name="FNanchor_83_83" id="FNanchor_83_83"></a><a +href="#Footnote_83_83" class="fnanchor">[83]</a> The establishment +founded by him, after various changes, became the Providence +Steam-Engine Works.</p> + +<p>James P. Allaire, of New York, the West Point Iron +Foundery, at West Point, on the Hudson River, and Daniel +Copeland and his son, Charles W. Copeland, on the +Connecticut River, were also early builders of engines for +steam-vessels. Daniel Copeland was probably the first +(1850) to adopt a slide-valve working with a lap to secure +the expansion of steam. His steamboats were then usually +stern-wheel vessels, and were built to ply on several routes +on the Connecticut River and Long Island Sound. The +son, Charles W. Copeland, went to West Point, and while +there designed some heavy marine steam-machinery, and +subsequently designed several steam vessels-of-war for the +United States Navy. He was the earliest designer of iron +steamers in the United States, building the Siamese in 1838. +This steamer was intended for use on Lake Pontchartrain +and the canal to New Orleans. It had two hulls, was 110 +feet long, and drew but 22 inches of water, loaded. The +two horizontal non-condensing engines turned a single +paddle-wheel placed between the two hulls, driving the +boat 10 miles an hour. The hull was constructed of plates<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">[282]</a></span> +of iron 10 feet long, formed on blocks after having been +heated in a furnace constructed especially for the purpose. +The frames were of T-iron, which was probably here used +for the first time. The same engineer, associated with Samuel +Hart, a well-known naval constructor, built, in 1841, for +the United States Navy, the iron steamer Michigan, a war-vessel +intended for service on the great northern lakes. +This vessel is still in service, and in good order. The hull +is 162<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in length, 27 feet in breadth, +and 12<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in +depth, measuring 500 tons. The frames were made of +T-iron, stiffened by reverse bars of L-iron. The keel-plate +was <span class="enum">5</span>∕<span class="denom">8</span> inch thick, the bottom plates +<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">8</span>, and the sides +<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">16</span> inch. +The deck-beams were of iron, and the vessel, as a whole, +was a good specimen of iron-ship building.</p> + +<p>During the period from 1830 to 1840, a considerable +number of the now standard details of steam-engine and +steamboat construction were devised or introduced by Copeland. +He was probably the first to use (on the Fulton, 1840) +an independent engine to drive the blowing-fans where an +artificial draught was required. He made a practice of +fitting his steamers with a “bilge-injection,” by means of +which the vessel could be freed of water, through the condenser +and air-pump, when leaking seriously; the condensing-water +is, in such a case, taken from inside the vessel, +instead of from the sea. This is probably an American device. +It was in use in the United States previously to 1835, +as was the use of anthracite coal on steamers, which was continued +by Copeland in manufacturing and in air-furnaces, as +well as on steamboats. He also modified the form of Stevens’s +double-poppet valve, giving it such shape that it was comparatively +easy to grind it tight and to keep it in order.</p> + +<p>In 1825, James P. Allaire, of New York, built compound +engines for the Henry Eckford, and subsequently +constructed similar engines for several other steamers, one +of which, the Sun, made the trip from New York to Albany +in 12 hours 18 minutes. He used steam at 100 pounds<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">[283]</a></span> +pressure. Erastus W. Smith afterward introduced this +form of engine on the Great Lakes, and still later they were +introduced into British steamers. The machinery of the +steamer Buckeye State was constructed at the Allaire +Works, New York, in 1850, from the designs of John +Baird and Erastus W. Smith, the latter being the designing +and constructing engineer. The steamer was placed +on the route between Buffalo, Cleveland, and Detroit, in +1851, and gave most satisfactory results, consuming less +than two-thirds the fuel required by a similar vessel of the +same line fitted with the single-cylinder engine. The steam-cylinders +of this engine were placed one within the other, +the low-pressure exterior cylinder being annular. They +were 37 and 80 inches in diameter respectively, and the +stroke was 11 feet. Both pistons were connected to one +cross-head, and the general arrangement of the engine was +similar to that of the common form of beam-engine. The +steam-pressure was from 70 to 75 pounds—about the maximum +pressure adopted a quarter of a century later on transatlantic +lines. This steamer was of high speed, as well as +economical of fuel.</p> + +<p>In the year 1830, there were 86 steamers on the Hudson +River and in Long Island Sound.</p> + +<p>During the early part of the nineteenth century, the +introduction of the steamboat upon the waters of the great +rivers of the interior of the United States was one of the +most notable details of its history. Inaugurated by the +unsuccessful experiment of Evans, the building of steamboats +on those waters, once commenced, never ceased; and +a generation after Fitch’s burial on the shore of the Ohio, +his last wish—that he might lie “where the song of the +boatman would enliven the stillness of his resting-place, and +the music of the steam-engine soothe his spirit”—was fulfilled +day by day unceasingly.</p> + +<p>Nicholas J. Roosevelt was, as has been already stated, +the first to take a steamboat down the great rivers. His<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">[284]</a></span> +boat was built at Pittsburgh in 1811, under an arrangement +with Fulton and Livingston, from Fulton’s plans. It was +called the “New Orleans,” was of about 200 tons burden, +and was propelled by a stern-wheel, assisted, when the +winds were favorable, by sails carried on two masts. The +hull was 138 feet long, 30 feet beam, and the cost of the +whole, including engines, was about $40,000. The builder, +with his family, an engineer, a pilot, and six “deck-hands,” +left Pittsburgh in October, 1811, reaching Louisville in 70 +hours (steaming about 10 miles an hour), and New Orleans +in 14 days, steaming from Natchez.</p> + +<p>The next steamers built on Western waters were probably +the Comet and the Vesuvius, both of which were in +service some time. The Comet was finally laid aside, and +the engine used to drive a mill, and the Vesuvius was destroyed +by the explosion of her boilers. As early as 1813 +there were two shops at Pittsburgh building steam-engines. +Steamboat-building now became an important and lucrative +business in the West; and it is stated that as early as 1840 +there were a thousand steamers on the Mississippi and its +tributaries.</p> + +<p>In the Washington, built at Wheeling, Va., in 1816, +under the direction of Captain Henry M. Shreve, the boilers, +which had previously been placed in the hold, were +carried on the main-deck, and a “hurricane-deck” was +built over them. Shreve substituted two horizontal direct-acting +engines for the single upright engine used by Fulton, +drove them by high-pressure steam without condensation, +and attached them, one on each side the boat, to +cranks placed at right angles. He adopted a cam cut-off +expanding the steam considerably, and the flue-boiler of +Evans. At that time the voyage from New Orleans to +Louisville occupied three weeks, and Shreve was made the +subject of many witticisms when he predicted that the time +would ultimately be shortened to ten days. It is now made +in four days. The Washington was seized at New Orleans,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">[285]</a></span> +in 1817, by order of Livingston, who claimed that his rights +included the monopoly of the navigation of the Mississippi +and its tributaries. The courts decided adversely on this +claim, and the release of the Washington was the act which +removed every obstacle to the introduction of steam-navigation +throughout the United States.</p> + +<p>The first steamer on the Great Lakes was the Ontario, +built in 1816, at Sackett’s Harbor. Fifteen years later, +Western steamboats had taken the peculiar form which has +since usually distinguished them.</p> + +<p>The use of the steam-engine for ocean-navigation kept +pace with its introduction on inland waters. Begun by +Robert L. Stevens in the United States, in the year 1808, +and by his contemporaries, Bell and Dodd, in Great Britain, +it steadily and rapidly advanced in effectiveness and importance, +and has now nearly driven the sailing fleet from the +ocean. Transatlantic steam-navigation began with the voyage +of the American steamer Savannah from Savannah, Ga., +to St. Petersburg, Russia, <i>via</i> Great Britain and the North-European +ports, in the year 1819. Fulton, not long before +his death, planned a vessel, which it was proposed to place +in service in the Baltic Sea; but circumstances compelled a +change of plan finally, and the steamer was placed on a +line between Newport, R. I., and the city of New York; +and the Savannah, several years later, made the voyage then +proposed for Fulton’s ship. The Savannah measured 350 +tons, and was constructed by Crocker & Fickett, at Corlears +Hook, N. Y. She was purchased by Mr. Scarborough, of +Savannah, who placed Captain Moses Rogers, previously in +command of the Clermont and of Stevens’s boat, the Phœnix, +in charge. The ship was fitted with steam-machinery +and paddle-wheels, and sailed for Savannah April 27, 1819, +making the voyage successfully in seven days. From Savannah, +the vessel sailed for Liverpool May 26th, and arrived +at that port June 20th. During this trip the engines +were used 18 days, and the remainder of the voyage was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">[286]</a></span> +made under sail. From Liverpool the Savannah sailed, +July 23d, for the Baltic, touching at Copenhagen, Stockholm, +St. Petersburg, and other ports. At St. Petersburg, +Lord Lyndock, who had been a passenger, was landed; and, +on taking leave of the commander of the steamer, the distinguished +guest presented him with a silver tea-kettle, suitably +inscribed with a legend referring to the importance of +the event which afforded him the opportunity. The Savannah +left St. Petersburg in November, passing New York +December 9th, and reaching Savannah in 50 days from the +date of departure, stopping four days at Copenhagen, Denmark, +and an equal length of time at Arundel, Norway. +Several severe gales were met in the Atlantic, but no serious +injury was done to the ship.</p> + +<p>The Savannah was a full-rigged ship. The wheels +were turned by an inclined direct-acting low-pressure engine, +having a steam-cylinder 40 inches in diameter and 6 +feet stroke of piston. The paddle-wheels were of wrought-iron, +and were so attached that they could be detached and +hoisted on board when it was desired. After the return of +the ship to the United States, the machinery was removed +and was sold to the Allaire Works, of New York. The +steam-cylinder was exhibited by the purchasers at the +“World’s Fair” at New York thirty years later. The vessel +was employed, as a sailing-vessel, on a line between +New York and Savannah, and was finally lost in the year +1822. Under sail, with a moderate breeze, this ship is said +to have sailed about three knots, and to have steamed five +knots. Pine-wood was used as the fuel, which fact accounts +for the necessity of making the transatlantic voyage partly +under sail.</p> + +<p>Renwick states that another vessel, ship-rigged and +fitted with a steam-engine, was built at New York in 1819, +to ply between New York and Charleston, and to New Orleans +and Havana, and that it proved perfectly successful +as a steamer, having good speed, and proving an excellent<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">[287]</a></span> +sea-boat. The enterprise was, however, pecuniarily a failure, +and the vessel was sold to the Brazilian Government +after the removal of the engine. In 1825 the steamer Enterprise +made a voyage to India, sailing and steaming as +the weather and the supply of fuel permitted. The voyage +occupied 47 days.</p> + +<p>Notwithstanding these successful passages across the +ocean, and the complete success of the steamboat in rivers +and harbors, it was asserted, as late as 1838, by many who +were regarded as authority, that the passage of the ocean +by steamers was quite impracticable, unless possibly they +could steam from the coasts of Europe to Newfoundland or +to the Azores, and, replenishing their coal-bunkers, resume +their voyages to the larger American ports. The voyage +was, however, actually accomplished by two steamers in +the year just mentioned. These were the Sirius, a ship of +700 tons and of 250 horse-power, and the Great Western, +of 1,340 tons and 450 horse-power. The latter was built +for this service, and was a large ship for that time, measuring +236 feet in length. Her wheels were 28 feet in diameter, +and 10 feet in breadth of face. The Sirius sailed from +Cork April 4, 1838, and the Great Western from Bristol +April 8th, both arriving at New York on the same day—April +23d—the Sirius in the morning, and the Great Western +in the afternoon.</p> + +<p>The Great Western carried out of Bristol 660 tons of +coal. Seven passengers chose to take advantage of the opportunity, +and made the voyage in one-half the time usually +occupied by the sailing-packets of that day. Throughout +the voyage the wind and sea were nearly ahead, and +the two vessels pursued the same course, under very similar +conditions. Arriving at New York, they were received +with the greatest possible enthusiasm. They were saluted +by the forts and the men-of-war in the harbor; the merchant-vessels +dipped their flags, and the citizens assembled +on the Battery, and, coming to meet them in boats of all<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">[288]</a></span> +kinds and sizes, cheered heartily. The newspapers of the +time were filled with the story of the voyage and with descriptions +of the steamers themselves and of their machinery.</p> + +<p>A few days later the two steamers started on their return +to Great Britain, the Sirius reaching Falmouth safely +in 18 days, and the Great Western making the voyage to +Bristol in 15 days, the latter meeting with head-winds and +working, during a part of the time, against a heavy gale +and in a high sea, at the rate of but two knots an hour. The +Sirius was thought too small for this long and boisterous +route, and was withdrawn and replaced on the line between +London and Cork, where the ship had previously been employed. +The Great Western continued several years in +the transatlantic trade.</p> + +<p>Thus these two voyages inaugurated a transoceanic +steam-service, which has steadily grown in extent and in +importance. The use of steam-power for this work of extended +ocean-transportation has never since been interrupted. +During the succeeding six years the Great Western +made 70 passages across the Atlantic, occupying on the +voyages to the westward an average of 15<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> days, and eastward +13<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span>. The quickest passage to New York was made +in May, 1843, in 12 days and 18 hours, and the fastest +steaming was logged 12 months earlier, when the voyage +from New York was made in 12 days and 7 hours.</p> + +<p>Meantime, several other steamers were built and placed +in the transatlantic trade. Among these were the Royal +William, the British Queen, the President, the Liverpool, +and the Great Britain. The latter, the finest of the fleet, +was launched in 1843. This steamer was 300 feet long, 50 +feet beam, and of 1,000 horse-power. The hull was of iron, +and the whole ship was an example of the very best work +of that time. After several voyages, this vessel went +ashore on the coast of Ireland, and there remained several +weeks, but was finally got off, without having suffered serious +injury—a remarkable illustration of the stanchness<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">[289]</a></span> +of an iron hull when well built and of good material. The +vessel was repaired, and many years afterward was still +afloat, and engaged in the transportation of passengers and +merchandise to Australia.</p> + +<p>The “Cunard Line” of transatlantic steamers was established +in the year 1840. The first of the line—the Britannia—sailed +from Liverpool for New York, July 4th of +that year, and was followed, on regular sailing-days, by the +other three of the four ships with which the company commenced +business. These four vessels had an aggregate tonnage +of 4,600 tons, and their speed was less than eight +knots. To-day, the tonnage of a single vessel of the fleet +exceeds that of the four; the total tonnage has risen to +many times that above given. There are 50 steamers in +the line, aggregating nearly 50,000 horse-power. The +speed of the steamships of the present time is double that +of the vessels of that date, and passages are not infrequently +made in eight days.</p> + +<p>The form of steam-engine in most general use at this +time, on transatlantic steamers, was that known as the +“side-lever engine.” It was first given the standard form +by Messrs. Maudsley & Co., of London, about 1835, and +was built by them for steamers supplied to the British Government +for general mail service.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig91" id="Fig91"></a> +<img src="images/illo317.png" alt="The Atlantic" width="400" height="283" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 91.</span>—The Atlantic, 1851.</p></div> + +<p>The steam-vessels of the time are well represented in +the accompanying engraving (<a href="#Fig91">Fig. 91</a>) of the steamship +Atlantic—a vessel which was shortly afterward (1851) built +as the pioneer steamer of the American “Collins Line.” +This steamship was one of several which formed the earliest +of American steamship-lines, and is one of the finest examples +of the type of paddle-steamers which was finally superseded +by the later screw-fleets. The “Collins Line” existed +but a very few years, and its failure was probably determined +as much by the evident and inevitable success of +screw-propulsion as by the difficulty of securing ample capital, +complete organization, and efficient general management.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">[290]</a></span> +This steamer was built at New York—the hull +by William Brown, and the machinery by the Novelty +Iron-Works. The length of the hull was 276 feet, its +breadth 45 feet, and the depth of hold 31<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet. The +width over the paddle-boxes was 75 feet. The ship measured +2,860 tons. The form of the hull was then peculiar +in the fineness of its lines; the bow was sharp, and the +stern fine and smooth, and the general outline such as best +adapted the ship for high speed. The main saloon was +about 70 feet long, and the dining-room was 60 feet in +length and 20 feet wide. The state-rooms were arranged +on each side the dining “saloon,” and accommodated 150 +passengers. These vessels were beautifully fitted up, and +with them was inaugurated that wonderful system of passenger-transportation +which has since always been distinguished +by those comforts and conveniences which the +American traveler has learned to consider his by right.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig92" id="Fig92"></a> +<img src="images/illo318.png" alt="Side-Lever Engine" width="400" height="391" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 92.</span>—The Side-Lever Engine, 1849.</p></div> + +<p>The machinery of these ships was, for that time, remarkably +powerful and efficient. The engines were of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">[291]</a></span> +side-lever type, as illustrated in <a href="#Fig92">Fig. 92</a>, which represents +the engine of the Pacific, designed by Mr. Charles W. +Copeland, and built by the Allaire Works.</p> + +<p>In this type of engine, as is seen, the piston-rod was +attached to a cross-head working vertically, from which, at +each side, links, <i>B C</i>, connected with the “side-lever,” +<i>D E F</i>. The latter vibrated about a “main centre” at <i>E</i>, +like the overhead beam of the more common form of engine; +from its other end, a “connecting-rod,” <i>H</i>, led to the +“cross-tail,” <i>W</i>, which was, in turn, connected to the crank-pin, +<i>I</i>. The condenser, <i>M</i>, and air-pump, <i>Q</i>, were constructed +in the same manner as those of other engines, their +only peculiarities being such as were incident to their location +between the cylinder, <i>A</i>, and the crank, <i>I J</i>. The<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">[292]</a></span> +paddle-wheels were of the common “radial” form, covered +in by paddle-boxes so strongly built that they were rarely +injured by the heaviest seas.</p> + +<p>These vessels surpassed, for a time, all other sea-going +steamers in speed and comfort, and made their passages +with great regularity. The minimum length of voyage +of the Baltic and Pacific, of this line, was 9 days 19 +hours.</p> + +<p>During the latter part of the period the history of which +has been here given, the marine steam-engine became subject +to very marked changes in type and in details, and a +complete revolution was effected in the method of propulsion. +This change has finally resulted in the universal +adoption of a new propelling instrument, and in driving the +whole fleet of paddle-steamers from the ocean. The Great +Britain was a screw-steamer.</p> + +<p>The screw-propeller, which, as has been stated, was +probably first proposed by Dr. Hooke in 1681, and by Dr. +Bernouilli, of Groningen, at about the middle of the eighteenth +century, and by Watt in 1784, was, at the end of the +century, tried experimentally in the United States by David +Bushnell, an ingenious American, who was then conducting +the experiments with torpedoes which were the cause of the +incident which originated that celebrated song by Francis +Hopkinson, the “Battle of the Kegs,” using the screw to +propel one of his submarine boats, and by John Fitch, and +by Dallery in France.</p> + +<p>Joseph Bramah, of Great Britain, May 9, 1785, patented +a screw-propeller identical in general arrangement with +those used to-day. His sketch exhibits a screw, apparently +of very fair shape, carried on an horizontal shaft, which +passes out of the vessel through a stuffing-box, the screw +being wholly submerged. Bramah does not seem to have +put his plan in practice. It was patented again in England, +also, by Littleton in 1794, and by Shorter in 1800.</p> + +<p>John Stevens, however, first gave the screw a practically<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_293" id="Page_293">[293]</a></span> +useful form, and used it successfully, in 1804 and 1805, on the +single and the twin screw boats which he built at that time. +This propelling instrument was also tried by Trevithick, +who planned a vessel to be propelled by a steam-engine +driving a screw, at about this time, and his scheme was laid +before the Navy Board in the year 1812. His plans included +an iron hull. Francis Pettit Smith tried the screw also in +the year 1808, and subsequently.</p> + +<p>Joseph Ressel, a Bohemian, proposed to use a screw in +the propulsion of balloons, about 1812, and in the year +1826 proposed its use for marine propulsion. He is said to +have built a screw-boat in the year 1829, at Trieste, which +he named the Civetta. The little craft met with an accident +on the trial-trip, and nothing more was done.</p> + +<p>The screw was finally brought into general use through +the exertions of John Ericsson, a skillful Swedish engineer, +who was residing in England in the year 1836, and of Mr. +F. P. Smith, an English farmer. Ericsson patented a peculiar +form of screw-propeller, and designed a steamer 40 +feet in length, of 8 feet beam, and drawing 3 feet of water. +The screw was double, two shafts being placed the one +within the other, revolving in opposite directions, and carrying +the one a right-hand and the other a left-hand +screw. These screws were 5<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> feet in diameter. On her +trial-trip this little steamer attained a speed of 10 miles an +hour. Its power as a “tug” was found to be very satisfactory; +it towed a schooner of 140 tons burden at the rate of +7 miles, and the large American packet-ship Toronto was +towed on the Thames at a speed of 5 miles an hour.</p> + +<p>Ericsson endeavored to interest the British Admiralty +in his improvements, and succeeded only so far as to induce +the Lords of the Admiralty to make an excursion with him +on the river. No interest was awakened in the new system, +and nothing was done by the naval authorities. A note to +the inventor from Captain Beaufort—one of the party—was +received shortly afterward, in which it was stated that the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_294" id="Page_294">[294]</a></span> +excursionists had not found the performance of the little +vessel to equal their hopes and expectations. All the interests +of the then existing engine-building establishments +were opposed to the innovation, and the proverbial conservatism +of naval men and naval administrations aided in +procuring the rejection of Ericsson’s plans.</p> + +<p>Fortunately for the United States, it happened, at that +time, that we had in Great Britain both civil and naval representatives +of greater intelligence, or of greater boldness +and enterprise. The consul at Liverpool was Mr. Francis +B. Ogden, of New Jersey, a gentleman who was somewhat +familiar with the steam-engine and with steam-navigation. +He had seen Ericsson’s plans at an earlier period, and had +at once seen their probable value. He was sufficiently confident +of success to place capital at the disposal of the inventor. +The little screw-boat just described was built with +funds of which he furnished a part, and was named, in his +honor, the Francis B. Ogden.</p> + +<p>Captain Robert F. Stockton, an officer of the United +States Navy, and also a resident of New Jersey, was in +London at the time, and made an excursion with Ericsson +on the Ogden. He was also at once convinced of the value +of the new method of application of steam-power to ship-propulsion, +and gave the engineer an order to build two +iron screw-steamboats for use in the United States. Ericsson +was induced, by Messrs. Ogden and Stockton, to take up +his residence in the United States.<a name="FNanchor_84_84" id="FNanchor_84_84"></a><a +href="#Footnote_84_84" class="fnanchor">[84]</a> The Stockton was sent +over to the United States in April, 1839, under sail, and +was sold to the Delaware & Raritan Canal Company. Her +name was changed, and, as the New Jersey, she remained +in service many years.</p> + +<p>The success of the boat built by Ericsson was so evident +that, although the naval authorities remained inactive, +a private company was formed, in 1839, to work the patents<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_295" id="Page_295">[295]</a></span> +of F. P. Smith, and this “Ship-Propeller Company” built +an experimental craft called the Archimedes, and its trial-trip +was made October 14th of the same year. The speed +attained was 9.64 miles an hour. The result was in every +respect satisfactory, and the vessel, subsequently, made +many voyages from port to port, and finally circumnavigated +the island of Great Britain. The proprietors of +the ship were not pecuniarily successful in their venture, +however, and the sale of the vessel left the company a +heavy loser. The Archimedes was 125 feet long, of 21 feet +10 inches beam, and 10 feet draught, registering 232 tons. +The engines were rated at 80 horse-power. Smith’s earlier +experiments (1837) were made with a little craft of 6 tons +burden, driven by an engine having a steam-cylinder 6 +inches in diameter and 15 inches stroke of piston. The +funds needed were furnished by a London banker—Mr. +Wright.</p> + +<p>Bennett Woodcroft had also used the screw experimentally +as early as 1832, on the Irwell, near Manchester, England, +in a boat of 55 tons burden. Twin-screws were used, +right and left handed respectively; they were each two feet +in diameter, and were given an expanding pitch. The boat +attained a speed of four miles an hour.</p> + +<p>Experiments made subsequently (1843) with this form of +screw, and in competition with the “true” screw of Smith, +brought out very distinctly the superiority of the former, +and gave some knowledge of the proper proportions for +maximum efficiency. In later examples of the Woodcroft +screw, the blades were made detachable and adjustable—a +plan which is still a usual one, and which has proved to be, +in some respects, very convenient.</p> + +<p>When Ericsson reached the United States, he was almost +immediately given an opportunity to build the Princeton—a +large screw-steamer—and at about the same time the +English and French Governments also had screw-steamers +built from his plans, or from those of his agent in England,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_296" id="Page_296">[296]</a></span> +the Count de Rosen. In these latter ships—the Amphion +and the Pomona—the first horizontal direct-acting engines +ever built were used, and they were fitted with double-acting +air-pumps, having canvas valves and other novel +features. The great advantages exhibited by these vessels +over the paddle-steamers of the time did for screw-propulsion +what Stephenson’s locomotive—the Rocket—did for +railroad locomotion ten years earlier.</p> + +<p>Congress, in 1839, had authorized the construction of +three war-vessels, and the Secretary of the Navy ordered +that two be at once built in the succeeding year. Of these, +one was the Princeton, the screw-steamer of which the machinery +was designed by Ericsson. The length of this vessel +was 164 feet, beam 30<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> +feet, and depth 21<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet. The +ship drew from 16<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> to 18 feet of water, displacing at those +draughts 950 and 1,050 tons. The hull had a broad, flat +floor, with sharp entrance and fine run, and the lines were +considered at that time remarkably fine.</p> + +<p>The screw was of gun-bronze, six-bladed, and was 14 +feet in diameter and of 35 feet pitch; i. e., were there no +slip, the screw working as if in a solid nut, the ship would +have been driven forward 35 feet at each revolution.</p> + +<p>The engines were two in number, and very peculiar in +form; the cylinder was, in fact, a <i>semi</i>-cylinder, and the +place of the piston-rod, as usually built, was taken by a vibrating +shaft, or “rock-shaft,” which carried a piston of +rectangular form, and which vibrated like a door on its +hinges as the steam was alternately let into and exhausted +from each side of it. The great rock-shaft carried, at the +outer end, an arm from which a connecting-rod led to the +crank, thus forming a “direct-acting engine.”</p> + +<p>The draught in the boilers was urged by blowers. +Ericsson had adopted this method of securing an artificial +draught ten years before, in one of his earlier vessels, the +Corsair. The Princeton carried a XII-inch wrought-iron +gun. This gun exploded after a few trials, with terribly<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_297" id="Page_297">[297]</a></span> +disastrous results, causing the death of several distinguished +men, including members of the President’s cabinet.</p> + +<p>The Princeton proved very successful as a screw-steamer, +attaining a speed of 13 knots, and was then considered +very remarkably fast. Captain Stockton, who commanded +the vessel, was most enthusiastic in praise of her.</p> + +<p>Immediately there began a revolution in both civil and +naval ship-building, which progressed with great rapidity. +The Princeton was the first of the screw-propelled navy +which has now entirely displaced the older type of steam-vessel. +The introduction of the screw now took place with +great rapidity. Six steamers were fitted with Ericsson’s +screw in 1841, 9 in 1842, and nearly 30 in the year 1843.</p> + +<p>In Great Britain, France, Germany, and other European +countries, the revolution was also finally effected, and was +equally complete. Nearly all sea-going vessels built toward +the close of the period here considered were screw-steamers, +fitted with direct-acting, quick-working engines. It was, +however, many years before the experience of engineers in +the designing and in the construction and management of +this new machinery enabled them to properly proportion it +for the various kinds of service to which they were called +upon to adapt it. Among other modifications of earlier practice +introduced by Ericsson was the surface-condenser with +a circulating pump driven by a small independent engine.</p> + +<p>The screw was found to possess many advantages over +the paddle-wheel as an instrument for ship-propulsion. +The cost of machinery was greatly reduced by its use; the +expense of maintenance in working order was, however, +somewhat increased. The latter disadvantage was, nevertheless, +much more than compensated by an immense increase +in the economy of ship-propulsion, which marked +the substitution of the new instrument and its impelling +machinery.</p> + +<p>When a ship is propelled by paddles, the motion of the +vessel creates, in consequence of the friction of the fluid<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_298" id="Page_298">[298]</a></span> +against the sides and bottom, a current of water which +flows in the direction in which the ship is moving, and +forms a current following the ship for a time, and finally +losing all motion by contact with the surrounding mass of +water. All the power expended in the production of this +great stream is, in the case of the paddle-steamer, entirely +lost. In screw-steamers, however, the propelling instrument +works in this following current, and the tendency of +its action is to bring the agitated fluid to rest, taking up +and thus restoring, usefully, a large part of that energy +which would otherwise have been lost. The screw is also +completely covered by the water, and acts with comparative +efficiency in consequence of its submersion. The rotation +of the screw is comparatively rapid and smooth, also, +and this permits the use of small, light, fast-running engines. +The latter condition leads to economy of weight +and space, and consequently saves not only the cost of +transportation of the excess of weight of the larger kind of +engine, but, leaving so much more room for paying cargo, +the gain is found to be a double one. Still further, the +quick-running engine is, other things being equal, the most +economical of steam; and thus some expense is saved not +only in the purchase of fuel, but in its transportation, and +some still additional gain is derived from the increased +amount of paying cargo which the vessel is thus enabled to +carry. The change here described was thus found to be +productive of enormous direct gain. Indirectly, also, some +advantage was derived from the greater convenience of a +deck clear from machinery and the great paddle-shaft, in +the better storage of the lading, the greater facility with +which the masts and sails could be fitted and used; and +directly, again, in clear sides unencumbered by great paddle-boxes +which impeded the vessel by catching both sea +and wind.</p> + +<p>The screw was, for some years, generally regarded as +simply auxiliary in large vessels, assisting the sails. Ultimately<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_299" id="Page_299">[299]</a></span> +the screw became the essential feature, and vessels +were lightly sparred and were given smaller areas of sail, +the latter becoming the auxiliary power.</p> + +<p>In November of the year 1843, the screw-steamer Midas, +Captain Poor, a small schooner-rigged craft, left New +York for China, on probably the first voyage of such length +ever undertaken by a steamer; and in the following January +the Edith, Captain Lewis, a bark-rigged screw-vessel, +sailed from the same port for India and China. The Massachusetts, +Captain Forbes, a screw-steamship of about 800 +tons, sailed for Liverpool September 15, 1845, the first voyage +of an American transatlantic passenger-steamer since +the Savannah’s pioneer adventure a quarter of a century +before. Two years later, American enterprise had placed +both screw and paddle steamers on the rivers of China—principally +through the exertions of Captain R. B. Forbes—and +steam-navigation was fairly established throughout +the world.</p> + +<p>On comparing the screw-steamer of the present time +with the best examples of steamers propelled by paddle-wheels, +the superiority of the former is so marked that it +may cause some surprise that the revolution just described +should have progressed no more rapidly. The reason of +this slow progress, however, was probably that the introduction +of the rapidly-revolving screw, in place of the slow-moving +paddle-wheel, necessitated a complete revolution in +the design of their steam-engines; and the unavoidable +change from the heavy, long-stroked, low-speed engines +previously in use, to the light engines, with small cylinders +and high piston-speed, called for by the new system of propulsion, +was one that necessarily occurred slowly, and was +accompanied by its share of those engineering blunders and +accidents that invariably take place during such periods of +transition. Engineers had first to learn to design such engines +as should be reliable under the then novel conditions +of screw-propulsion, and their experience could only be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_300" id="Page_300">[300]</a></span> +gained through the occurrence of many mishaps and costly +failures. The best proportions of engines and screws, for a +given ship, were determined only by long experience, although +great assistance was derived from the extensive series +of experiments made with the French steamer Pelican. +It also became necessary to train up a body of engine-drivers +who should be capable of managing these new engines; for +they required the exercise of a then unprecedented amount +of care and skill. Finally, with the accomplishment of +these two requisites to success must simultaneously occur +the enlightenment of the public, professional as well as +non-professional, in regard to their advantages. Thus it +happens that it is only after a considerable time that the +screw attained its proper place as an instrument of propulsion, +and finally drove the paddle-wheel quite out of use, +except in shoal water.</p> + +<p>Now our large screw-steamers are of higher speed than +any paddle-steamers on the ocean, and develop their power +at far less cost. This increased economy is due not only to +the use of a more efficient propelling instrument, and to +changes already described, but also, in a great degree, to +the economy which has followed as a consequence of other +changes in the steam-engine driving it. The earliest days +of screw-propulsion witnessed the use of steam of from 5 +to 15 pounds pressure, in a geared engine using jet-condensation, +and giving a horse-power at an expense of perhaps +7 to 10, or even more, pounds of coal per hour. A little +later came direct-acting engines with jet-condensation and +steam at 20 pounds pressure, costing about 5 or 6 pounds +per horse-power per hour. The steam-pressure rose a little +higher with the use of greater expansion, and the economy +of fuel was further improved. The introduction of the surface-condenser, +which began to be generally adopted some +ten years ago, brought down the cost of power to from 3 +to 4 pounds in the better class of engines. At about the +same time, this change to surface-condensation helping<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_301" id="Page_301">[301]</a></span> +greatly to overcome those troubles arising from boiler-incrustation +which had prevented the rise of steam-pressure +above about 25 pounds per square inch, and as, at the same +time, it was learned by engineers that the deposit of lime-scale +in the marine boiler was determined by temperature +rather than by the degree of concentration, and that all the +lime entering the boiler was deposited at the pressure just +mentioned, a sudden advance took place. Careful design, +good workmanship, and skillful management, made the surface-condenser +an efficient apparatus; and, the dangers of +incrustation being thus lessened, the movement toward +higher pressures recommenced, and progressed so rapidly +that now 75 pounds per square inch is very usual, and +more than 125 pounds has since been attained.</p> + +<p>The close of this period was marked by the construction +of the most successful types of paddle-steamers, the +complete success of transoceanic steam-transportation, the +introduction of the screw-propeller and the peculiar engine +appropriate to it, and, finally, a general improvement, which +had finally become marked both in direction and in rapidity +of movement, leading toward the use of higher steam-pressure, +greater expansion, lighter and more rapidly-working +machinery, and decidedly better design and construction, +and the use of better material. The result of these +changes was seen in economy of first cost and maintenance, +and the ability to attain greater speed, and to assure greater +safety to passengers and less risk to cargo.</p> + +<p>The introduction of the changes just noted finally led +to the last great change in the form of the marine steam-engine, +and a revolution was inaugurated, which, however, +only became complete in the succeeding period. The non-success +of Hornblower and of Wolff, and others who had +attempted to introduce the “compound” or double-cylinder +engine on land, had not convinced all engineers that it +might not yet be made a successful rival of the then standard +type; and the three or four steamers which were built<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_302" id="Page_302">[302]</a></span> +for the Hudson River at the end of the first quarter of the +nineteenth century are said to have been very successful +vessels. Carrying 75 to 100 pounds of steam in their boilers, +the Swiftsure and her contemporaries were by that circumstance +well fitted to make that form of engine economically +a success. This form of engine was built occasionally +during the succeeding quarter of a century, but only became +a recognized standard type after the close of the epoch to +the history of which this chapter is devoted. That latest +and greatest advance in the direction of increased efficiency +in the marine steam-engine was, however, commenced very +soon after Watt’s death, and its completion was the work +of nearly a half-century.</p> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_58_58" id="Footnote_58_58"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_58_58"><span class="label">[58]</span></a> “Steam and the Steam-Engine.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_59_59" id="Footnote_59_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59_59"><span class="label">[59]</span></a> “<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3160">Odyssey</a>,” Book VIII., p. 175.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_60_60" id="Footnote_60_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60_60"><span class="label">[60]</span></a> <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/19406"><i>Scientific +American</i>, February 24, 1877</a>.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_61_61" id="Footnote_61_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61_61"><span class="label">[61]</span></a> “Les Merveilles de la Science.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_62_62" id="Footnote_62_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62_62"><span class="label">[62]</span></a> “Some New Enquiries tending to the Improvement of Navigation.” +London, 1760.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_63_63" id="Footnote_63_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63_63"><span class="label">[63]</span></a> <i>Lancaster Daily Express</i>, December 10, 1872. This account is collated +from various manuscripts and letters in the possession of the author.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_64_64" id="Footnote_64_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64_64"><span class="label">[64]</span></a> Bowen’s “Sketches,” p. 56.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_65_65" id="Footnote_65_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65_65"><span class="label">[65]</span></a> Some of West’s portraits, including those of Mr. and Mrs. Henry, +were lately in the possession of Mr. John Jordan, of Philadelphia.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_66_66" id="Footnote_66_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66_66"><span class="label">[66]</span></a> Figuier.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_67_67" id="Footnote_67_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67_67"><span class="label">[67]</span></a> “Life of John Fitch,” Westcott.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_68_68" id="Footnote_68_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_68_68"><span class="label">[68]</span></a> <i>Rivington’s Gazette</i>, February 16, 1775.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_69_69" id="Footnote_69_69"></a><a href="#FNanchor_69_69"><span class="label">[69]</span></a> <i>Providence Journal</i>, May 7, 1874. Coll., N. H. Antiquar. Soc., No. 1; +“Who invented the Steamboat?” William A. Mowry, 1874.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_70_70" id="Footnote_70_70"></a><a href="#FNanchor_70_70"><span class="label">[70]</span></a> Rev. Cyrus Mann, in the <i>Boston Recorder</i>, 1858.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_71_71" id="Footnote_71_71"></a><a href="#FNanchor_71_71"><span class="label">[71]</span></a> Westcott.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_72_72" id="Footnote_72_72"></a><a href="#FNanchor_72_72"><span class="label">[72]</span></a> This is substantially an arrangement that has recently become common. +It has been repatented by later inventors.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_73_73" id="Footnote_73_73"></a><a href="#FNanchor_73_73"><span class="label">[73]</span></a> “Nathan Read and the Steam-Engine.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_74_74" id="Footnote_74_74"></a><a href="#FNanchor_74_74"><span class="label">[74]</span></a> “Encyclopædia Americana.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_75_75" id="Footnote_75_75"></a><a href="#FNanchor_75_75"><span class="label">[75]</span></a> “A Lost Chapter in the History of the Steamboat,” J. H. B. Latrobe, +1871.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_76_76" id="Footnote_76_76"></a><a href="#FNanchor_76_76"><span class="label">[76]</span></a> <i>Vide</i> “Life of Fulton,” Reigart.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_77_77" id="Footnote_77_77"></a><a href="#FNanchor_77_77"><span class="label">[77]</span></a> <i>Vide</i> “Life of Fulton,” Colden.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_78_78" id="Footnote_78_78"></a><a href="#FNanchor_78_78"><span class="label">[78]</span></a> A French inventor, a watchmaker of Trévoux, named Desblancs, had +already deposited at the Conservatoire a model fitted with “chaplets.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_79_79" id="Footnote_79_79"></a><a href="#FNanchor_79_79"><span class="label">[79]</span></a> Woodcroft, p. 64.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_80_80" id="Footnote_80_80"></a><a href="#FNanchor_80_80"><span class="label">[80]</span></a> A newspaper-slip in the scrap-book of the author has the following:</p> + +<p>“The traveler of today, as he goes on board the great steamboats St. +John or Drew, can scarcely imagine the difference between such floating +palaces and the wee-bit punts on which our fathers were wafted 60 years +ago. We may, however, get some idea of the sort of thing then in use by +a perusal of the steamboat announcements of that time, two of which are as +follows:</p> + +<p class="center">[“<i>Copy of an Advertisement taken from the Albany Gazette, dated September, +1807.</i>]</p> + +<p>“The North River Steamboat will leave Pauler’s Hook Ferry [now Jersey +City] on Friday, the 4th of September, at 9 in the morning, and arrive +at Albany on Saturday, at 9 in the afternoon. Provisions, good berths, +and accommodations are provided. +</p> + +<p>“The charge to each passenger is as follows:</p> + +<table summary="Price List"> + +<tr> +<td class="left">“To</td> +<td class="lr05">Newburg</td> +<td class="center">dols.</td> +<td class="right">3</td> +<td class="left">,</td> +<td class="center">time</td> +<td class="right">14</td> +<td class="center">hours.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="lr05">Poughkeepsie</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="right">4</td> +<td class="left">,</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="center">17</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="lr05">Esopus</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="right">5</td> +<td class="left">,</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="center">20</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="lr05">Hudson</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="right">5</td> +<td class="left"><span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span>,</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="center">30</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="lr05">Albany</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="right">7</td> +<td class="left">,</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td class="center">36</td> +<td class="center">„</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>“For places, apply to William Vandervoort, No. 48 Courtlandt Street, +on the corner of Greenwich Street.</p> + +<p>“<i>September 2, 1807.</i></p> + +<p class="center">[“<i>Extract from the New York Evening Post, dated October 2, 1807.</i>]</p> + +<p>“Mr. Fulton’s new-invented <i>Steamboat</i>, which is fitted up in a neat style +for passengers, and is intended to run from New York to Albany as a +Packet, left here this morning with 90 passengers, against a strong head-wind. +Notwithstanding which, it was judged she moved through the waters +at the rate of six miles an hour.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_81_81" id="Footnote_81_81"></a><a href="#FNanchor_81_81"><span class="label">[81]</span></a> Bishop.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_82_82" id="Footnote_82_82"></a><a href="#FNanchor_82_82"><span class="label">[82]</span></a> <i>American Journal of Science</i>, March, 1827; <i>London Mechanics’ Magazine</i>, +June 16, 1827.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_83_83" id="Footnote_83_83"></a><a href="#FNanchor_83_83"><span class="label">[83]</span></a> “New Universal Cyclopædia,” vol. iv., 1878.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_84_84" id="Footnote_84_84"></a><a href="#FNanchor_84_84"><span class="label">[84]</span></a> This distinguished inventor is still a resident of New York (1878).</p></div> + +<hr class="l05" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/illo329.png" alt="Ornament" width="250" height="270" /></div> + +<hr class="c40" /><p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_303" id="Page_303">[303]</a></p> + +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VI" id="CHAPTER_VI"></a>CHAPTER VI.</h2> + +<h3><i>THE STEAM-ENGINE OF TO-DAY.</i></h3> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>... “And, last of all, with inimitable power, and ‘with whirlwind +sound,’ comes the potent agency of steam. In comparison with the past, +what centuries of improvement has this single agent comprised in the short +compass of fifty years! Everywhere practicable, everywhere efficient, it has +an arm a thousand times stronger than that of Hercules, and to which human +ingenuity is capable of fitting a thousand times as many hands as +belonged to Briareus. Steam is found in triumphant operation on the seas; +and, under the influence of its strong propulsion, the gallant ship—</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">‘Against the wind, against the tide,<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Still steadies with an upright keel.’<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p>It is on the rivers, and the boatman may repose on his oars; it is on highways, +and exerts itself along the courses of land-conveyance; it is at the +bottom of mines, a thousand feet below the earth’s surface; it is in the +mills, and in the workshops of the trades. It rows, it pumps, it excavates, +it carries, it draws, it lifts, it hammers, it spins, it weaves, it prints. It +seems to say to men, at least to the class of artisans: ‘Leave off your manual +labor; give over your bodily toil; bestow but your skill and reason to the +directing of my power, and I will bear the toil, with no muscle to grow weary, +no nerve to relax, no breast to feel faintness!’ What further improvement +may still be made in the use of this astonishing power it is impossible to +know, and it were vain to conjecture. What we do know is, that it has most +essentially altered the face of affairs, and that no visible limit yet appears +beyond which its progress is seen to be impossible.”—<span class="smcap">Daniel Webster.</span></p></div> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<h4><span class="smcap">The Period of Refinement—1850 to Date.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>By the middle of the present century, as we have now +seen, the steam-engine had been applied, and successfully, +to every great purpose for which it was fitted. Its first +application was to the elevation of water; it next was applied +to the driving of mills and machinery; and it finally<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_304" id="Page_304">[304]</a></span> +became the great propelling power in transportation by +land and by sea.</p> + +<p>At the beginning of the period to which we are now +come, these applications of steam-power had become familiar +both to the engineer and to the public. The forms of +engine adapted to each purpose had been determined, and +had become usually standard. Every type of the modern +steam-engine had assumed, more or less closely, the form +and proportions which are now familiar; and the most +intelligent designers and builders had been taught—by experience +rather than by theory, for the theory of the steam-engine +had then been but little investigated, and the principles +and laws of thermo-dynamics had not been traced in +their application to this engine—the principles of construction +essential to successful practice, and were gradually +learning the relative standing of the many forms of steam-engine, +from among which have been preserved a few specially +fitted for certain specific methods of utilization of +power.</p> + +<p>During the years succeeding the date 1850, therefore, +the growth of the steam-engine had been, not a change of +standard type, or the addition of new parts, but a gradual +improvement in forms, proportions, and arrangements of +details; and this period has been marked by the dying out +of the forms of engine least fitted to succeed in competition +with others, and the retention of the latter has been an example +of “the survival of the fittest.” This has therefore +been a Period of Refinement.</p> + +<p>During this period invention has been confined to details; +it has produced new forms of parts, new arrangements +of details; it has devised an immense variety of +valves, valve-motions, regulating apparatus, and a still +greater variety of steam-boilers and of attachments, essential +and non-essential, to both engines and boilers. The +great majority of these peculiar devices have been of no +value, and very many of the best of them have been found<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_305" id="Page_305">[305]</a></span> +to have about equal value. All the well-known and successful +forms of engine, when equally well designed and constructed +and equally well managed, are of very nearly equal +efficiency; all of the best-known types of steam-boiler, +where given equal proportions of grate to heating-surface +and equally well designed, with a view to securing a good +draught and a good circulation of water, have been found +to give very nearly equally good results; and it has become +evident that a good knowledge of principles and of +practice, on the part of the designer, the constructor, and +the manager of the boiler, is essential in the endeavor to +achieve economical success; that good engineering is demanded, +rather than great ingenuity. The inventor has +been superseded here by the engineer.</p> + +<p>The knowledge acquired in the time of Watt, of the +essential principles of steam-engine construction, has since +become generally familiar to the better class of engineers. +It has led to the selection of simple, strong, and durable +forms of engine and boiler, to the introduction of various +kinds of valves and of valve-gearing, capable of adjustment +to any desired range of expansive working, and to the attachment +of efficient forms of governor to regulate the speed of +the engine, by determining automatically the point of cut-off +which will, at any instant, best adjust the energy exerted +by the expanding steam to the demand made by the work +to be done.</p> + +<p>The value of high pressures and considerable expansion +was recognized as long ago as in the early part of the present +century, and Watt, by combining skillfully the several +principal parts of the steam-engine, gave it very nearly +the shape which it has to-day. The compound engine, +even, as has been seen, was invented by contemporaries of +Watt, and the only important modifications since his time +have occurred in details. The introduction of the “drop +cut-off,” the attachment of the governor to the expansion-apparatus +in such a manner as to determine the degree of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_306" id="Page_306">[306]</a></span> +expansion, the improvement of proportions, the introduction +of higher steam and greater expansion, the improvement of +the marine engine by the adoption of surface-condensation, +in addition to these other changes, and the introduction of +the double-cylinder engine, after the elevation of steam-pressure +and increase of expansion had gone so far as to +justify its use, are the changes, therefore, which have taken +place during this last quarter-century. It began then to be +generally understood that expansion of steam produced +economy, and mechanics and inventors vied with each other +in the effort to obtain a form of valve-gear which should +secure the immense saving which an abstract consideration +of the expansion of gases according to Marriotte’s law +would seem to promise. The counteracting phenomena of +internal condensation and reëvaporation, of the losses of +heat externally and internally, and of the effect of defective +vacuum, defective distribution of steam, and of back-pressure, +were either unobserved or were entirely overlooked.</p> + +<p>It was many years, therefore, before engine-builders became +convinced that no improvement upon existing forms +of expansion-gear could secure even an approximation to +theoretical efficiency.</p> + +<p>The fact thus learned, that the benefit of expansive +working has a limit which is very soon reached in ordinary +practice, was not then, and has only recently become, generally +known among our steam-engine builders, and for +several years, during the period upon which we now enter, +there continued the keenest competition between makers of +rival forms of expansion-gear, and inventors were continually +endeavoring to produce something which should far +excel any previously-existing device.</p> + +<p>In Europe, as in the United States, efforts to “improve” +standard designs have usually resulted in injuring their +efficiency, and in simply adding to the first cost and running +expense of the engines, without securing a marked +increase in economy in the consumption of steam.</p> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_307" id="Page_307">[307]</a></p> +<h4><span class="smcap">Section I.—Stationary Engines.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>“<span class="smcap">Stationary Engines</span>” had been applied to the operation +of mill-machinery, as has been seen, by Watt and by +Murdoch, his assistant and pupil; and Watt’s competitors, +in Great Britain and abroad, had made considerable progress +before the death of the great engineer, in its adaptation to +its work. In the United States, Oliver Evans had introduced +the non-condensing high-pressure stationary engine, +which was the progenitor of the standard engine of that type +which is now used far more generally than any other form. +These engines were at first rude in design, badly proportioned, +rough and inaccurate as to workmanship, and uneconomical +in their consumption of fuel. Gradually, however, +when made by reputable builders, they assumed neat and +strong shapes, good proportions, and were well made and +of excellent materials, doing their work with comparatively +little waste of heat or of fuel.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig93" id="Fig93"></a> +<img src="images/illo335.png" alt="Vertical Stationary Engine" width="263" height="500" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 93.</span>—Vertical Stationary Steam-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>One of the neatest and best modern designs of stationary +engine for small powers is seen in <a href="#Fig93">Fig. 93</a>, which represents +a “vertical direct-acting engine,” with base-plate—a +form which is a favorite with many engineers.</p> + +<p>The engine shown in the engraving consists of two principal +parts, the cylinder and the frame, which is a tapering +column having openings in the sides, to allow free access +to all the working parts within. The slides and pillow-blocks +are cast with the column, so that they cannot become +loose or out of line; the rubbing surfaces are large +and easily lubricated. Owing to the vertical position, there +is no tendency to side wear of cylinder or piston. The +packing-rings are self-adjusting, and work free but tight. +The crank is counterbalanced; the crank-pin, cross-head pin, +piston-rod, valve-stem, etc., are made of steel; all the bearing +surfaces are made extra large, and are accurately fitted; +and the best quality of Babbitt-metal only used for the +journal-bearings.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_308" id="Page_308">[308]</a></span>The smaller sizes of these engines, from 2 to 10 horse-power, +have both pillow-blocks cast in the frame, giving a +bearing each side of the double cranks. They are built by +some constructors in quantities, and parts duplicated by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_309" id="Page_309">[309]</a></span> +special machinery (as in fire-arms and sewing-machines), +which secures great accuracy and uniformity of workmanship, +and allows of any part being quickly and cheaply +replaced, when worn or broken by accident. The next figure +is a vertical section through the same engine.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig94" id="Fig94"></a> +<img src="images/illo336.png" alt="Vertical Stationary Engine, Section" width="350" height="454" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 94.</span>—Vertical Stationary Steam-Engine. Section.</p></div> + +<p>Engines fitted with the ordinary rigid bearings require +to be erected on a firm foundation, and to be kept in perfect +line. If, by the settling of the foundation, or from any +other cause, they get out of line, heating, cutting, and +thumping result. To obviate this, modern engines are often +fitted with self-adjusting bearings throughout; this gives +the engine great flexibility and freedom from friction. The +accompanying cuts show clearly how this is accomplished.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_310" id="Page_310">[310]</a></span> +The pillow-block has a spherical shell turned and fitted into +the spherically-bored pillow-block, thus allowing a slight +angular motion in any direction. The connecting-rod is +forged in a single piece, without straps, gibs, or key, and is +mortised through at each end for the reception of the brass +boxes, which are curved on their backs, and fit the cheek-pieces, +between which they can turn to adjust themselves +to the pins, in the plane of the axis of the rod. The adjustment +for wear is made by wedge-blocks and set screws, +as shown, and they are so constructed that the parts cannot +get loose and cause a break-down. The cross-head has +adjustable gibs on each side, turned to fit the slides, which +are cast solidly in the frame, and bored out exactly in the +line with the cylinder. This permits it freely to turn on its +axis, and, in connection with the adjustable boxes in the +connecting-rod, allows a perfect self-adjustment to the line of +the crank-pin. The out-board bearing may be moved an inch +or more out of position in any direction, without detriment to +the running of the engine, all bearings accommodating themselves +perfectly to whatever position the shaft may assume.</p> + +<p>The ports and valve-passages are proportioned as in +locomotive practice. The valve-seat is adapted to the ordinary +plain slide or D-valve, should it be preferred, but the +balanced piston slide-valve works with equal ease whether +the steam-pressure is 10 or 100 pounds, and at the same time +gives double steam and exhaust openings, which greatly facilitates +the entrance of the steam to, and its escape from, the +cylinder, thus securing a nearer approach to boiler-pressure +and a less back-pressure, saving the power required to work +an ordinary valve, and reducing the wear of valve-gear.</p> + +<p>This is a type of engine frequently seen in the United +States, but more rarely in Europe. It is an excellent form +of engine. The vertical direct-acting engine is sometimes, +though rarely, built of very considerable size, and these +large engines are more frequently seen in rolling-mills than +elsewhere.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_311" id="Page_311">[311]</a></span></p> + +<p>Where much power is required, the stationary engine is +usually an horizontal direct-acting engine, having a more +or less effective cut-off valve-gear, according to the size of +engine and the cost of fuel. A good example of the simpler +form of this kind of engine is the small horizontal +slide-valve engine, with independent cut-off valve riding on +the back of the main valve—a combination generally known +among engineers as the Meyer system of valve-gear. This +form of steam-engine is a very effective machine, and does +excellent work when properly proportioned to yield the required +amount of power. It is well adapted to an expansion +of from four to five times. Its disadvantages are the +difficulty which it presents in the attachment of the regulator, +to determine the point of cut-off by the heavy work +which it throws upon the governor when attached, and the +rather inflexible character of the device as an expansive +valve-gear. The best examples of this class of engine have +neat heavy bed-plates, well-designed cylinders and details, +smooth-working valve-gear, the expansion-valve adjusted +by a right and left hand screw, and regulation secured by +the attachment of the governor to the throttle-valve.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig95" id="Fig95"></a> +<img src="images/illo339.png" alt="Horizontal Stationary Steam-Engine" width="484" height="300" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 95.</span>—Horizontal Stationary Steam-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>The engine shown in the accompanying illustration +(<a href="#Fig95">Fig. 95</a>) is an example of an excellent British stationary +steam-engine. It is simple, strong, and efficient. The +frame, front cylinder-head, cross-head guides, and crank-shaft +“plumber-block,” are cast in one piece, as has so +generally been done in the United States for a long time +by some of our manufacturers. The cylinder is secured +against the end of the bed-plate, as was first done by Corliss. +The crank-pin is set in a counterbalanced disk. The +valve-gear is simple, and the governor effective, and provided +with a safety-device to prevent injury by the breaking +of the governor-belt. An engine of this kind of 10 +inches diameter of cylinder, 20 inches stroke of piston, is +rated by the builders at about 25 horse-power; a similar +engine 30 inches in diameter of cylinder would yield from<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_312" id="Page_312">[312-313]</a></span> +<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_313" id="Page_313"></a></span>225 to 250 horse-power. In this example, all parts are made +to exact size by gauges standardized to Whitworth’s sizes.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig96" id="Fig96"></a> +<img src="images/illo340.png" alt="Horizontal Stationary Steam-Engine" width="550" height="300" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 96.</span>—Horizontal Stationary Steam-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>In American engines (as is seen in <a href="#Fig96">Fig. 96</a>), usually, two +supports are placed—the one under the latter bearing, and +the other under the cylinder—to take the weight of the engine; +and through them it is secured to the foundation. +As in the vertical engine already described, a valve is +sometimes used, consisting of two pistons connected by a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_314" id="Page_314">[314]</a></span> +rod, and worked by an ordinary eccentric. By a simple +arrangement these pistons have always the same pressure inside +as out, which prevents any leakage or blowing through; +and they are said always to work equally as well and free +from friction under 150 pounds pressure as under 10 pounds +per square inch, and to require no adjustment. It is more +usual, however, to adopt the three-ported valve used on +locomotives, with (frequently) a cut-off valve on the back +of this main valve, which cut-off valve is adjusted either +by hand or by the governor.</p> + +<p>Engines of the class just described are especially well +fitted, by their simplicity, compactness, and solidity, to +work at the high piston-speeds which are gradually becoming +generally adopted in the effort to attain increased +economy of fuel by the reduction of the immense losses of +heat which occur in the expansion of steam in the metallic +cylinders through which we are now compelled to work it.</p> + +<p>One of the best known of recent engines is the Allen +engine, a steam-engine having the same general arrangement +of parts seen in the above illustration, but fitted with +a peculiar valve-gear, and having proportions of parts which +are especially calculated to secure smoothness of motion +and uniformity of pressure on crank-pin and journals, at +speeds so high that the inertia of the reciprocating parts +becomes a seriously-important element in the calculation of +the distribution of stresses and their effect on the dynamics +of the machine.</p> + +<p>In the Allen engine,<a name="FNanchor_85_85" id="FNanchor_85_85"></a><a href="#Footnote_85_85" class="fnanchor">[85]</a> the cylinder and frame are connected +as in the engine seen above, and the crank-disk, +shaft-bearings, and other principal details, are not essentially +different. The valve-gear<a name="FNanchor_86_86" id="FNanchor_86_86"></a><a href="#Footnote_86_86" class="fnanchor">[86]</a> differs in having four valves, +one at each end on the steam as well as on the exhaust side, +all of which are balanced and work with very little resistance. +These valves are not detachable, but are driven by<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_315" id="Page_315">[315]</a></span> +a link attached to and moved by an eccentric on the main +shaft, the position of the valve-rod attachment to which +link is determined by the governor, and the degree of expansion +is thus adjusted to the work of the engine. The +engine has usually a short stroke, not exceeding twice the +diameter of cylinder, and is driven at very high speed, generally +averaging from 600 to 800 feet per minute.<a name="FNanchor_87_87" id="FNanchor_87_87"></a><a href="#Footnote_87_87" class="fnanchor">[87]</a> This +high piston-speed and short stroke give very great velocity +of rotation. The effect is, therefore, to produce an exceptional +smoothness of motion, while permitting the use of +small fly-wheels. Its short stroke enables entire solidity to +be attained in a bed of rigid form, making it a very completely +self-contained engine, adapted to the heaviest work, +and requiring only a small foundation.</p> + +<p>The journals of the shaft, and all cylindrical wearing +surfaces, are finished by grinding in a manner that leaves +them perfectly round. The crank-pin and cross-head pin +are hardened before being ground. The joints of the valve-gear +consist of pins turning in solid ferrules in the rod-ends, +both hardened and ground. After years of constant use +thus, no wear occasioning lost time in the valve-movements +has been detected.</p> + +<p>High speed and short strokes are essential elements of +economy. It is now well understood that all the surfaces +with which the steam comes in contact condense it.</p> + +<p>Obviously, one way to diminish this loss is to reduce the +extent of surface to which the steam is exposed. In engines +of high speed and short stroke, the surfaces with which the +steam comes in contact, while doing a given amount of +work, present less area than in ordinary engines running at +low speed. Where great steadiness of motion is desired, +the expense of coupled engines is often incurred. Quick-running +engines do not require to be coupled; a single +engine may give greater uniformity of motion than is usually<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_316" id="Page_316">[316]</a></span> +obtained with coupled engines at ordinary speeds. The +ports and valve-movements, the weight of the reciprocating +parts, and the size and weight of the fly-wheels, should be +calculated expressly for the speeds chosen.</p> + +<p>The economy of the engine here described is unexcelled +by the best of the more familiar “drop cut-off” engines.</p> + +<p>An engine reported upon by a committee of the American +Institute, of which Dr. Barnard was chairman, was +non-condensing, 16 inches in diameter of cylinder, 30 inches +stroke, making 125 revolutions per minute, and developed +over 125 horse-power with 75 pounds of steam in the boiler, +using 25<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> pounds of steam per indicated horse-power, and +2.87 pounds of coal—an extraordinarily good performance +for an engine of such small power.</p> + +<p>The governor used on this engine is known as the Porter +governor. It is given great power and delicacy by +weighting it down, and thus obtaining a high velocity of +rotation, and by suspending the balls from forked arms, +which are given each two bearing-pins separated laterally +so far as to permit considerable force to be exerted in +changing speeds without cramping those bearings sufficiently +to seriously impair the sensitiveness of the governor. +This engine as a whole may be regarded as a good representative +of the high-speed engine of to-day.</p> + +<p>Since this change in the direction of high speeds has +already gone so far that the “drop cut-off” is sometimes +inapplicable, in consequence of the fact that the piston +would, were such a valve-gear adopted, reach the end of +its stroke before the detached valve could reach its seat; +and since this progress is only limited by our attainments +in mechanical skill and accuracy, it seems probable that +the “positive-motion expansion-gear” type of engine will +ultimately supersede the now standard “drop cut-off engine.”</p> + +<p>The best known and most generally used class of stationary +engines at the present time is, however, that which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_317" id="Page_317">[317]</a></span> +has the so-called “drop cut-off,” or “detachable valve-gear.” +The oldest well-known form of valve-motion of this description +now in use is that known as the Sickels cut-off, +patented by Frederick E. Sickels, an American mechanic, +about the year 1841, and also built by Hogg, of New York, +who placed it upon the engine of the steamer South America. +The invention is claimed for both Hogg and Sickels. +It was introduced by the inventor in a form which especially +adapted it to use with the beam-engine used on the +Eastern waters of the United States, and was adapted to +stationary engines by Messrs. Thurston, Greene & Co., of +Providence, R. I., who made use of it for some years before +any other form of “drop cut-off” came into general use. +The Sickels cut-off consisted of a set of steam-valves, usually +independent of the exhaust-valves, and each raised by +a catch, which could be thrown out, at the proper moment, +by a wedge with which it came in contact as it rose with +the opening valve. This wedge, or other equivalent device, +was so adjusted that the valve should be detached and fall to +its seat when the piston reached that point in its movement, +after taking steam, at which expansion was to commence. +From this point, no steam entering the cylinder, the piston +was impelled by the expanding vapor. The valve was usually +the double-poppet. Sickels subsequently invented what +was called the “beam-motion,” to detach the valve at any +point in the stroke. As at first arranged, the valve could +only be detached during the earlier half-stroke, since at +mid-stroke the direction of motion of the eccentric rod was +reversed and the valve began to descend. By introducing a +“wiper” having a motion transverse to that of the valve +and its catch, and by giving this wiper a motion coincident +with that of the piston by connecting it with the beam or +other part of the engine moving with the piston, he obtained +a kinematic combination which permitted the valve +to be detached at any point in the stroke, adding a very +simple contrivance which enabled the attendant to set the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_318" id="Page_318">[318]</a></span> +wiper so that it should strike the catch at any time during +the forward movement of the “beam-motion.”</p> + +<p>On stationary engines, the point of cut-off was afterward +determined by the governor, which was made to operate +the detaching mechanism, the combination forming what +is sometimes called an “automatic” cut-off. The attachment +of the governor so as to determine the degree of expansion +had been proposed before Sickels’s time. One of +the earliest of these contrivances was that of Zachariah +Allen, in 1834, using a cut-off valve independent of the +steam-valve. The first to so attach the governor to a <i>drop +cut-off</i> valve-motion was George H. Corliss, who made it +a feature of the Corliss valve-gear in 1849. In the year +1855, N. T. Greene introduced a form of expansion-gear, +in which he combined the range of the Sickels beam-motion +device with the expansion-adjustment gained by the attachment +of the governor, and with the advantages of flat slide-valves +at all ports—both steam and exhaust.</p> + +<p>Many other ingenious forms of expansion valve-gear +have been invented, and several have been introduced, +which, properly designed and proportioned to well-planned +engines, and with good construction and management, +should give economical results little if at all inferior to +those just named. Among the most ingenious of these +later devices is that of Babcock & Wilcox, in which a very +small auxiliary steam-cylinder and piston is employed to +throw the cut-off valve over its port at the instant at which +the steam is to be cut off. A very beautiful form of isochronous +governor is used on this engine, to regulate the +speed of the engine by determining the point of cut-off.</p> + +<p>In Wright’s engine, the expansion is adjusted by the +movement, by the regulator, of cams which operate the +steam-valves so that they shall hold the valve open a longer +or shorter time, as required.</p> + +<p>Since compactness and lightness are not as essential as +in portable, locomotive, and marine engines, the parts are<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_319" id="Page_319">[319]</a></span> +arranged, in stationary engines, with a view simply to securing +efficiency, and the design is determined by circumstances. +It was formerly usual to adopt the condensing +engine in mills, and wherever a stationary engine was required. +In Europe generally, and to some extent in the +United States, where a supply of condensing water is obtainable, +condensing engines and moderate steam-pressures +are still employed. But this type of engine is gradually +becoming superseded by the high-pressure condensing engine, +with considerable expansion, and with an expansion-gear +in which the point of cut-off is determined by the +governor.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig97" id="Fig97"></a> +<img src="images/illo346.png" alt="Corliss Engine" width="476" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 97.</span>—Corliss Engine.</p></div> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig98" id="Fig98"></a> +<img src="images/illo347.png" alt="Corliss Engine Valve-Motion" width="350" height="378" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 98</span>—Corliss Engine Valve-Motion.</p></div> + +<p>The best-known engine of this class is the Corliss engine, +which is very extensively used in the United States, +and which has been copied very generally by European +builders. <a href="#Fig97">Fig. 97</a> represents the Corliss engine. The +horizontal steam-cylinder is bolted firmly to the end of the +frame, which is so formed as to transmit the strain to the +main journal with the greatest directness. The frame carries +the guides for the cross-head, which are both in the +same vertical plane. The valves are four in number, a +steam and an exhaust valve being placed at each end of the +steam-cylinder. Short steam-passages are thus secured, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_320" id="Page_320">[320]</a></span> +this diminution of clearance is a source of some economy. +Both sets of valves are driven by an eccentric operating a +disk or wrist-plate, <i>E</i> (<a href="#Fig98">Fig. 98</a>), which vibrates on a pin projecting +from the cylinder. Short links reaching from this +wrist-plate to the several valves, <i>D D</i>, <i>F F</i>, move them with +a peculiarly varying motion, opening and closing them rapidly, +and moving them quite slowly when the port is either +nearly open or almost closed. This effect is ingeniously +secured by so placing the pins on the wrist-plate that their +line of motion becomes nearly transverse to the direction of +the valve-links when the limit of movement is approached. +The links connecting the wrist-plate with the arms moving +the steam-valves have catches at their extremities, which +are disengaged by coming in contact, as the arm swings +around with the valve-stem, with a cam adjusted by the +governor. This adjustment permits the steam to follow the +piston farther when the engine is caused to “slow down,” +and thus tends to restore the proper speed. It disengages +the steam-valve earlier, and expands the steam to a greater<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_321" id="Page_321">[321]</a></span> +extent, when the engine begins to run above the proper +speed. When the catch is thrown out, the valve is closed +by a weight or a strong spring. To prevent jar when the +motion of the valve is checked, a “dash-pot” is used, invented +originally by F. E. Sickels. This is a vessel having +a nicely-fitted piston, which is received by a “cushion” of +water or air when the piston suddenly enters the cylinder +at the end of the valve-movement. In the original water +dash-pot of Sickels, the cylinder is vertical, and the plunger +or piston descends upon a small body of water confined in +the base of the dash-pot. Corliss’s air dash-pot is now often +set horizontally.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig99" id="Fig99"></a> +<img src="images/illo348.png" alt="Greene Engine" width="350" height="460" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 99.</span>—Greene Engine.</p></div> + +<p>In the Greene steam-engine (<a href="#Fig99">Fig. 99</a>), the valves +are<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_322" id="Page_322">[322]</a></span> +four in number, as in the Corliss. The cut-off gear consists +of a bar, <i>A</i>, moved by the steam-eccentric in a direction +parallel with the centre-line of the cylinder and nearly coincident +as to time with the piston. On this bar are tappets, +<i>C C</i>, supported by springs and adjustable in height by +the governor, <i>G</i>. These tappets engage the arms <i>B B</i>, on +the ends of rock-shafts, <i>E E</i>, which move the steam-valves +and remain in contact with them a longer or shorter time, +and holding the valve open during a greater or less part of +the piston-stroke, as the governor permits the tappets to +rise with diminishing engine-speed, or forces them down as +speed increases. The exhaust-valves are moved by an independent +eccentric rod, which is itself moved by an eccentric +set, as is usual with the Corliss and with other engines +generally, at right angles with the crank. This engine, in +consequence of the independence of the steam-eccentric, +and of the contemporary movement of steam valve-motion +and steam-piston, is capable of cutting off at any point +from beginning to nearly the end of the stroke. The usual +arrangement, by which steam and exhaust valves are moved +by the same eccentric, only permits expansion with the +range from the beginning to half-stroke. In the Corliss +engine the latter construction is retained, with the object, +in part, of securing a means of closing the valve by a “positive +motion,” should, by any accident, the closing not be +effected by the weight or spring usually relied upon.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig100" id="Fig100"></a> +<img src="images/illo349.png" alt="Greene-Engine Valve-Gear" width="350" height="235" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 100.</span>—Thurston’s Greene-Engine Valve-Gear.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_323" id="Page_323">[323]</a></span>The steam-valve of the Greene engine, as designed by +the author, is seen in <a href="#Fig100">Fig. 100</a>, where the valve, <i>G H</i>, covering +the port, <i>D</i>, in the steam-cylinder, <i>A B</i>, is moved by +the rod, <i>J J</i>, connected to the rock-shaft, <i>M</i>, by the arm, +<i>L K</i>. The line, <i>K I</i>, should, when carried out, intersect +the valve-face at its middle point, under <i>G</i>.</p> + +<p>The characteristics of the American stationary engine, +therefore, are high steam-pressure without condensation, an +expansion valve-gear with drop cut-off adjustable by the +governor, high piston-speed, and lightness combined with +strength of construction. The pressure most commonly +adopted in the boilers which furnish steam to this type of +engine is from 75 to 80 pounds per square inch; but a +pressure of 100 pounds is not infrequently carried, and the +latter pressure may be regarded as a “mean maximum,” +corresponding to a pressure of 60 pounds at about the +commencement of the period here considered—1850.</p> + +<p>Very much greater pressures have, however, been adopted +by some makers, and immensely “higher steam” has +been experimented with by several engineers. As early as +1823, Jacob Perkins<a name="FNanchor_88_88" id="FNanchor_88_88"></a><a +href="#Footnote_88_88" class="fnanchor">[88]</a> commenced experimenting with steam +of very great tension. As has already been stated, the usual +pressure at the time of Watt was but a few pounds—5 or +7—in excess of that of the atmosphere. Evans, Trevithick, +and Stevens, had previously worked steam at pressures of +from 50 to 75 pounds per square inch, and pressures on the +Western rivers and elsewhere in the United States had already +been raised to 100 or 150 pounds, and explosions were +becoming alarmingly frequent.</p> + +<p>Perkins’s experimental apparatus consisted of a copper +boiler, of a capacity of about one cubic foot, having sides +3 inches in thickness. It was closed at the bottom and +top, and had five small pipes leading from the upper head.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_324" id="Page_324">[324]</a></span> +This was placed in a furnace kept at a high temperature by +a forced combustion. Safety-valves loaded respectively to +425 and 550 pounds per square inch were placed on each of +two of the steam-pipes.</p> + +<p>Perkins used the steam generated under these great +pressures in a little engine having a piston 2 inches in diameter +and a stroke of 1 foot. It was rated at 10 horse-power.<a name="FNanchor_89_89" +id="FNanchor_89_89"></a><a href="#Footnote_89_89" class="fnanchor">[89]</a></p> + +<p>In the year 1827, Perkins had attained working pressures, +in a single-acting, single-cylinder engine, of upward +of 800 pounds per square inch. At pressures exceeding 200 +pounds, he had much trouble in securing effective lubrication, +as all oils charred and decomposed at the high temperatures +then unavoidably encountered, and he finally succeeded +in evading this seemingly insurmountable obstacle +by using for rubbing parts a peculiar alloy which required +no lubrication, and which became so beautifully polished, +after some wear, that the friction was less than where lubricants +were used. At these high pressures Perkins seems +to have met with no other serious difficulty. He condensed +the exhaust-steam and returned it to the boiler, but did not +attempt to create a vacuum in his condenser, and therefore +needed no air-pump. Steam was cut off at one-eighth +stroke.</p> + +<p>In the same year, Perkins made a compound engine on +the Woolf plan, and adopted a pressure of 1,400 pounds, expanding<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_325" id="Page_325">[325]</a></span> +eight times. In still another engine, intended for a +steam-vessel, Perkins adopted, or proposed to adopt, 2,000 +pounds pressure, cutting off the admission at one-sixteenth, +in single-acting engines of 6 inches diameter of cylinder +and 20 inches stroke of piston. The steam did not retain +boiler-pressure at the cylinder, and this engine was only +rated at 30 horse-power.<a name="FNanchor_90_90" id="FNanchor_90_90"></a><a href="#Footnote_90_90" class="fnanchor">[90]</a></p> + +<p>Stuart follows a description of Perkins’s work in the +improvement of the steam-engine and the introduction of +steam-artillery by the remark:</p> + +<p>“ ... No other mechanic of the day has done more +to illustrate an obscure branch of philosophy by a series of +difficult, dangerous, and expensive experiments; no one’s +labors have been more deserving of cheering encouragement, +and no one has received less. Even in their present +state, his experiments are opening new fields for philosophical +research, and his mechanism bids fair to introduce a +new style into the proportions, construction, and form, of +steam-machinery.”</p> + +<p>Perkins’s experience was no exception to the general +rule, which denies to nearly all inventors a fair return for +the benefits which they confer upon mankind.</p> + +<p>Another engineer, a few years later, was also successful +in controlling and working steam under much higher pressures +than are even now in use. This was Dr. Ernst Alban, +a distinguished German engine-builder, of Plau, Mecklenburg, +and an admirer of Oliver Evans, in whose path he, a +generation later, advanced far beyond that great pioneer. +Writing in 1843, he describes a system of engine and boiler +construction, with which he used steam under pressures +about equal to those experimentally worked by Jacob Perkins, +Evans’s American successor. Alban’s treatise was +translated and printed in Great Britain,<a name="FNanchor_91_91" +id="FNanchor_91_91"></a><a href="#Footnote_91_91" class="fnanchor">[91]</a> four years later.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_326" id="Page_326">[326]</a></span>Alban, on one occasion, used steam of 1,000 pounds +pressure. His boilers were similar in general form to the +boiler patented by Stevens in 1805, but the tubes were horizontal +instead of vertical. He evaporated from 8 to 10 +pounds of water into steam of 600 to 800 pounds pressure +with each pound of coal. He states that the difficulty met +by Perkins—the decomposition of lubricants in the steam-cylinder—did +not present itself in his experiments, even +when working steam at a pressure of 600 pounds on the +square inch, and he found that less lubrication was needed +at such high pressures than in ordinary practice. Alban +expanded his steam about as much as Evans, in his usual +practice, carrying a pressure of 150 pounds, and cutting off +at one-third; he adopted greatly increased piston-speed, attaining +300 feet per minute, at a time when common practice +had only reached 200 feet. He usually built an oscillating +engine, and rarely attached a condenser. The valve was the +locomotive-slide.<a name="FNanchor_92_92" id="FNanchor_92_92"></a><a +href="#Footnote_92_92" class="fnanchor">[92]</a> The stroke was made short to secure +strength, compactness, cheapness, and high speed of rotation; +but Alban does not seem to have understood the +principles controlling the form and proportions of the expansive +engine, or the necessity of adopting considerable +expansion in order to secure economy in working steam of +great tension, and therefore was, apparently, not aware of +the advantages of a long stroke in reducing losses by “dead-space,” +in reducing risk of annoyance by hot journals, or in +enabling high piston-speeds to be adopted. He seems +never to have attained a sufficiently high speed of piston to +become aware that the oscillating cylinder cannot be used +at speeds perfectly practicable with the fixed cylinder.</p> + +<p>Alban states that one of his smallest engines, having a +cylinder 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches in diameter and 1 foot stroke of piston, +with a piston-speed of but 140 to 160 feet per minute, developed +4 horse-power, with a consumption of 5.3 pounds<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_327" id="Page_327">[327]</a></span> +of coal per hour. This is a good result for so small an +amount of work, and for an engine working at so low a +speed of piston. An engine of 30 horse-power, also working +very slowly, required but 4.1 pounds of coal per hour +per horse-power.</p> + +<p>The work of Perkins and of Alban, like that of their +predecessors, Evans, Stevens, and Trevithick, was, however, +the work of engineers who were far ahead of their time. +The general practice, up to the time which marked the +beginning of the modern “period of refinement,” had been +but gradually approximating that just described. Higher +pressures were slowly approached; higher piston-speeds +came slowly into use; greater expansion was gradually +adopted; the causes of losses of heat were finally discovered, +and steam-jacketing and external non-conducting coverings +were more and more generally applied as builders +became more familiar with their work. The “compound +engine” was now and then adopted; and each experiment, +made with higher steam and greater expansion, was more +nearly successful than the last.</p> + +<p>Finally, all these methods of securing economy became +recognized, and the reasons for their adoption became +known. It then remained, as the final step in this progression, +to combine all these requisites of economical working +in a double-cylinder engine, steam-jacketed, well protected +by non-conducting coverings, working steam of high pressure, +and with considerable expansion at high piston-speed. +This is now done by the best builders.</p> + +<p>One of the best examples of this type of engine is that +constructed by the sons of Jacob Perkins, who continued +the work of their father after his death. Their engines are +single-acting, and the small or high-pressure cylinder is +placed on the top of the larger or low-pressure cylinder. +The valves are worked by rotating stems, and the loss of +heat and burning of packing incident to the use of the common +method are thus avoided. The stuffing-boxes are<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_328" id="Page_328">[328]</a></span> +placed at the end of long sleeves, closely surrounding the +vertical valve-stems also, and the water of condensation +which collects in these sleeves is an additional and thorough +protection against excessively high temperature at the packing. +The piston-rings are made of the alloy which has been +found to require no lubrication.</p> + +<p>Steam is usually worked at from 250 to 450 pounds, and +is generated in boilers composed of small tubes three inches +in diameter and three-eighths of an inch thick, which are +tested under a pressure of 2,500 pounds per square inch. +The safety-valve is usually loaded to 400 pounds. The +boiler is fed with distilled water, obtained principally by +condensation of the exhaust-steam, any deficiency being +made up by the addition of water from a distilling apparatus. +Under these conditions, but 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> pound of coal is +consumed per hour and per horse-power.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">The Pumping-Engine</span> in use at the present time has +passed through a series of changes not differing much from +that which has been traced with the stationary mill-engine. +The Cornish engine is still used to some extent for supplying +water to towns, and is retained at deep mines. The +modern Cornish engine differs very little from that of the +time of Watt, except in the proportions of parts and the +form of its details. Steam-pressures are carried which were +never reached during the preceding period, and, by careful +adjustment of well-set and well-proportioned valves and +gearing, the engine has been made to work rather more rapidly, +and to do considerably more work. It still remains, +however, a large, costly, and awkward contrivance, requiring +expensive foundations, and demanding exceptional care, +skill, and experience in management. It is gradually going +out of use. This engine, as now constructed by good +builders, is shown in section in <a href="#Fig101">Fig. 101</a>.</p> + +<p>A comparison with the Watt engine of a century earlier +will at once enable any one to appreciate the extent to +which changes may be made in perfecting a machine, even<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_329" id="Page_329">[329]</a></span> +after it has become complete, so far as supplying it with +all essential parts can complete it.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig101" id="Fig101"></a> +<img src="images/illo356.png" alt="Cornish Pumping-Engine" width="400" height="447" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 101.</span>—Cornish Pumping-Engine, 1880.</p></div> + +<p>In the figure, <i>A</i> is the cylinder, taking steam from the +boiler through the steam-passage, <i>M</i>. The steam is first +admitted above the piston, <i>B</i>, driving it rapidly downward +and raising the pump-rod, <i>E</i>. At an early period in the +stroke the admission of steam is checked by the sudden +closing of the induction-valve at <i>M</i>, and the stroke is completed +under the action of expanding steam assisted by the +inertia of the heavy parts already in motion. The necessary +weight and inertia is afforded, in many cases, where +the engine is applied to the pumping of deep mines, by the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_330" id="Page_330">[330]</a></span> +immensely long and heavy pump-rods. Where this weight +is too great, it is counterbalanced, and where too small, +weights are added. When the stroke is completed, the +“equilibrium valve” is opened, and the steam passes from +above to the space below the piston, and an equilibrium of +pressure being thus produced, the pump-rods descend, forcing +the water from the pumps and raising the steam-piston. +The absence of the crank, or other device which might determine +absolutely the length of stroke, compels a very +careful adjustment of steam-admission to the amount of +load. Should the stroke be allowed to exceed the proper +length, and should danger thus arise of the piston striking +the cylinder-head, <i>N</i>, the movement is checked by buffer-beams. +The valve-motion is actuated by a plug-rod, <i>J K</i>, +as in Watt’s engine. The regulation is effected by a “cataract,” +a kind of hydraulic governor, consisting of a plunger-pump, +with a reservoir attached. The plunger is raised by +the engine, and then automatically detached. It falls with +greater or less rapidity, its velocity being determined by +the size of the eduction-orifice, which is adjustable by hand. +When the plunger reaches the bottom of the pump-barrel, +it disengages a catch, a weight is allowed to act upon the +steam-valve, opening it, and the engine is caused to make a +stroke. When the outlet of the cataract is nearly closed, +the engine stands still a considerable time while the plunger +is descending, and the strokes succeed each other at long +intervals. When the opening is greater, the cataract acts +more rapidly, and the engine works faster. This has been +regarded until recently as the most economical of pumping-engines, +and it is still generally used in freeing mines of +water, and in situations where existing heavy pump-rods +may be utilized in counterbalancing the steam-pressure, +and, by their inertia, in continuing the motion after the +steam, by its expansion, has become greatly reduced in +pressure.</p> + +<p>In this engine a gracefully-shaped and strong beam, <i>D</i>,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_331" id="Page_331">[331]</a></span> +has taken the place of the ruder beam of the earlier period, +and is carried on a well-built wall of masonry, <i>R</i>. <i>F</i> is the +exhaust-valve, by which the steam passes to the condenser, +<i>G</i>, beside which is the air-pump, <i>H</i>, and the hot-well, <i>I</i>. +The cylinder is steam-jacketed, <i>P</i>, and protected against +losses of heat by radiation by a brick wall, <i>O</i>, the whole +resting on a heavy foundation, <i>Q</i>.</p> + +<p>The Bull Cornish engine is also still not infrequently +seen in use. The Cornish engine of Great Britain averages +a duty of about 45,000,000 pounds raised one foot high per +100 pounds of coal. More than double this economy has +sometimes been attained.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig102" id="Fig102"></a> +<img src="images/illo358.png" alt="Steam Pump" width="400" height="297" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 102.</span>—Steam-Pump.</p></div> + +<p>A vastly simpler form of pumping-engine without fly-wheel +is the now common “direct-acting steam-pump.” +This engine is generally made use of in feeding steam-boilers, +as a forcing and fire pump, and wherever the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_332" id="Page_332">[332]</a></span> +amount of water to be moved is not large, and where the +pressure is comparatively great. The steam-cylinder, <i>A R</i>, +and feed-pump, <i>B Q</i> (<a href="#Fig102">Fig. 102</a>), are in line, and the two +pistons have usually one rod, <i>D</i>, in common. The two cylinders +are connected by a strong frame, <i>N</i>, and two standards +fitted with lugs carry the whole, and serve as a means +of bolting the pump to the floor or to its foundation.</p> + +<p>The method of working the steam-valve of the modern +steam-pump is ingenious and peculiar. As shown, the pistons +are moving toward the left; when they reach the end +of their stroke, the face of the piston strikes a pin or other +contrivance, and thus moves a small auxiliary valve, <i>I</i>, +which opens a port, <i>E</i>, and causes steam to be admitted behind +a piston, or permits steam to be exhausted, as in the +figure, from before the auxiliary piston, <i>F</i>, and the pressure +within the main steam-chest then forces that piston over, +moving the main steam-valve, <i>G</i>, to which it is attached, +admitting steam to the left-hand side of the main piston, +and exhausting on the right-hand side, <i>A</i>. Thus the motion +of the engine operates its own valves in such a manner +that it is never liable to stop working at the end of the stroke, +notwithstanding the absence of the crank and fly-wheel, or +of independent mechanism, like the cataract of the Cornish +engine. There is a very considerable variety of pumps of +this class, all differing in detail, but all presenting the distinguishing +feature of auxiliary valve and piston, and a +connection by which it and the main engine each works the +valve of the other combination.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig103" id="Fig103"></a> +<img src="images/illo360.png" alt="Section Worthinton Pumping-Engine" width="547" height="390" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 103.</span>—The Worthington Pumping-Engine, 1876. Section.</p></div> + +<p>In some cases these pumps are made of considerable +size, and are applied to the elevation of water in situations +to which the Cornish engine was formerly considered exclusively +applicable. The accompanying <a href="#Fig103">figure</a> illustrates such +a pumping-engine, as built for supplying cities with water. +This is a “compound” direct-acting pumping-engine. The +cylinders, <i>A B</i>, are placed in line, working one pump, <i>F</i>, +and operating their own air-pumps, <i>D D</i>, by a bell-crank<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_333" id="Page_333">[333]</a></span> +lever, <i>L H</i>, connected to the pump-buckets by links, <i>I K</i>. +Steam exhausted from the small cylinder, <i>A</i>, is further expanded +in the large cylinder, <i>B</i>, and thence goes to the +condenser, <i>C</i>. The valves, <i>N M</i>, are moved by the valve-gear, +<i>L</i>, which is actuated by the piston-rod of a similar +pair of cylinders placed by the side of the first. These<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_334" id="Page_334">[334]</a></span> +valves are balanced, and the balance-plates, <i>R Q</i>, are suspended +from the rods, <i>O P</i>, which allow them to move with +the valves. By connecting the valves of each engine with<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_335" id="Page_335">[335]</a></span> +the piston-rod of the other, it is seen that the two engines +must work alternately, the one making a stroke while the +other is still, and then itself stopping a moment while the +latter makes its stroke.</p> + +<p>Water enters the pump through the induction-pipe, <i>E</i>, +passes into the pump-barrel through the valves, <i>V V</i>, and +issues through the eduction-valves, <i>T T</i>, and goes on to the +“mains” by the pipe, <i>G</i>, above which is seen an air-chamber, +which assists to preserve a uniform pressure on that +side the pump. This engine works very smoothly and +quietly, is cheap and durable, and has done excellent duty.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig104" id="Fig104"></a> +<img src="images/illo361.png" alt="Worthington Pumping-Engine" width="575" height="343" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 104.</span>—The Worthington Pumping-Engine.</p> +<p class="center fsize80"><a href="images/large361.png">Large scale image</a> (362 kB).</p></div> + +<p>Beam pumping-engines are now almost invariably built +with crank and fly-wheel, and very frequently are compound +engines. The accompanying <a href="#Fig105">illustration</a> represents +an engine of the latter form.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig105" id="Fig105"></a> +<img src="images/illo362.png" alt="Double-Cylinder Pumping-Engine" width="460" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 105.</span>—Double-Cylinder Pumping-Engine, 1878.</p></div> + +<p><i>A</i> and <i>B</i> are the two steam-cylinders, connected by +links and parallel motion, <i>C D</i>, to the great cast-iron beam, +<i>E F</i>. At the opposite end of the beam, the connecting-rod,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_336" id="Page_336">[336]</a></span> +<i>G</i>, turns a crank, <i>H</i>, and fly-wheel, <i>L M</i>, which regulates +the motion of the engine and controls the length of +stroke, averting all danger of accident occurring in consequence +of the piston striking either cylinder-head. The +beam is carried on handsomely-shaped iron columns, which, +with cylinders, pump, and fly-wheel, are supported by a<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_337" id="Page_337">[337]</a></span> +substantial stone foundation. The pump-rod, <i>I</i>, works a +double-acting pump, <i>J</i>, and the resistance to the issuing +water is rendered uniform by an air-chamber, <i>K</i>, within +which the water rises and falls when pressures tend to vary +greatly. A revolving shaft, <i>N</i>, driven from the fly-wheel +shaft, carries cams, <i>O P</i>, which move the lifting-rods seen +directly over them and the valves which they actuate. Between +the steam-cylinders and the columns which carry the +beams is a well, in which are placed the condenser and air-pump. +Steam is carried at 60 or 80 pounds pressure, and +expanded from 6 to 10 times.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig106" id="Fig106"></a> +<img src="images/illo363.png" alt="Lawrence Water Works Engine" width="332" height="450" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 106.</span>—The Lawrence Water-Works Engine.</p></div> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig107" id="Fig107"> +</a><img src="images/illo364.png" alt="Leavitt Pumping-Engine" width="350" height="413" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 107.</span>—The Leavitt Pumping-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>A later form of double-cylinder beam pumping-engine +is that invented and designed by E. D. Leavitt, Jr., for the +Lawrence Water-Works, and shown in <a href="#Fig106">Figs. 106</a> and <a href="#Fig107">107</a>. +The two cylinders are placed one on each side the centre of +the beam, and are so inclined that they may be coupled to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_338" id="Page_338">[338]</a></span> +opposite ends of it, while their lower ends are placed close +together. At their upper ends a valve is placed at each +end of the connecting steam-pipe. At their lower ends a +single valve serves as exhaust-valve to the high-pressure +and as steam-valve to the low-pressure cylinder. The pistons +move in opposite directions, and steam is exhausted +from the high-pressure cylinder directly into the nearer end +of the low-pressure cylinder. The pump, of the “Thames-Ditton” +or “bucket-and-plunger” variety, takes a full supply +of water on the down-stroke, and discharges half when +rising and half when descending again. The duty of this +engine is reported by a board of engineers as 103,923,215 +foot-pounds for every 100 pounds of coal burned. The +duty of a moderately good engine is usually considered to +be from 60 to 70 millions. This engine has steam-cylinders +of 17<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> and 36 inches diameter respectively, with a stroke of +7 feet. The pump had a capacity of about 195 gallons, +and delivered 96 per cent. Steam was carried at a pressure +of 75 pounds above the atmosphere, and was expanded +about 10 times. Plain horizontal tubular boilers were used, +evaporating 8.58 pounds of water from 98° Fahr. per pound +of coal.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Steam-boilers.</span>—The steam supplied to the forms of +stationary engine which have been described is generated in +steam-boilers of exceedingly varied forms. The type used +is determined by the extent to which their cost is increased +in the endeavor to economize fuel by the pressure of steam +carried, by the greater or less necessity of providing against +risk of explosion, by the character of the feed-water to be +used, by the facilities which may exist for keeping in good +repair, and even by the character of the men in whose +hands the apparatus is likely to be placed.</p> + +<p>As has been seen, the changes which have marked the +growth and development of the steam-engine have been +accompanied by equally marked changes in the forms of +the steam-boiler. At first, the same vessel served the distinct<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_339" id="Page_339">[339]</a></span> +purposes of steam-generator and steam-engine. Later, +it became separated from the engine, and was then specially +fitted to perform its own peculiar functions; and its form +went through a series of modifications under the action of +the causes already stated.</p> + +<p>When steam began to be usefully applied, and considerable +pressures became necessary, the forms given to boilers +were approximately spherical, ellipsoidal, or cylindrical. +Thus the boilers of De Caus (1615) and of the Marquis of +Worcester (1663) were spherical and cylindrical; those of +Savery (1698) were ellipsoidal and cylindrical. After the +invention of the steam-engine of Newcomen, the pressures +adopted were again very low, and steam-boilers were given +irregular forms until, at the beginning of the present century, +they were again of necessity given stronger shapes. +The material was at first frequently copper; it is now usually +wrought-iron, and sometimes steel.</p> + +<p>The present forms of steam-boilers may be classified as +plain, flue, and tubular boilers. The plain cylindrical or +common cylinder boiler is the only representative of the first +class in common use. It is perfectly cylindrical, with heads +either flat or hemispherical. There is usually attached +to the boiler a “steam-drum” (a small cylindrical vessel), +from which the steam is taken by the steam-pipe. This enlargement +of the steam-space permits the mist, held in suspension +by the steam when it first rises from the surface of +the water, to separate more or less completely before the +steam is taken from the boiler.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig108" id="Fig108"></a> +<img src="images/illo368.png" alt="Babcock & Wilcox's Vertical Boiler" width="350" height="537" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 108.</span>—Babcock & Wilcox’s Vertical Boiler.</p></div> + +<p>Flue-boilers are frequently cylindrical, and contain one +or more cylindrical flues, which pass through from end to +end, beneath the water-line, conducting the furnace-gases, +and affording a greater area of heating-surface than can be +obtained in the plain boiler. They are usually from 30 to +48 inches in diameter, and one foot or less in length for +each inch of diameter. Some are, however, made 100 feet +and more in length. The boiler is made of iron +<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> +to <span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">8</span> +of an<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_340" id="Page_340">[340]</a></span> +inch in thickness, with hemispherical or carefully stayed +flat heads, and without flues. The whole is placed in a +brickwork setting. These boilers are used where fuel is +inexpensive, where the cost of repairing would be great, or +where the feed-water is impure. A cylindrical boiler, having +one flue traversing it longitudinally, is called a Cornish +boiler, as it is generally supposed to have been first used in +Cornwall. It was probably first invented by Oliver Evans +in the United States, previous to 1786, at which time he +had it in use. The flue has usually a diameter 0.5 or 0.6 +the diameter of the boiler. A boiler containing two longitudinal +flues is called the Lancashire boiler. This form +was also introduced by Oliver Evans. The flues have one-third +the diameter of the boiler. Several flues of smaller +diameter are often used, and when a still greater proportional +area of heating-surface is required, tubes of from 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> +inch to 4 or 5 inches in diameter are substituted for flues. +The flues are usually constructed by riveting sheets together, +as in making the shell or outer portion. They are +sometimes welded by British manufacturers, but rarely if +ever in the United States. Tubes are always “lap-welded” +in the process of rolling them. Small tubes were first used +in the United States, about 1785. In portable, locomotive, +and marine steam-boilers, the fire must be built within the +boiler itself, instead of (as in the above described stationary +boilers) in a furnace of brickwork exterior to the boiler. +The flame and gases from the furnace or fire-box in these +kinds of boiler are never led through brick passages en +route to the chimney, as often in the preceding case, but +are invariably conducted through flues or tubes, or both, to +the smoke-stack. These boilers are also sometimes used as +stationary boilers. <a href="#Fig108">Fig. 108</a> represents such a steam-boiler +in section, as it is usually exhibited in working drawings. +Provision is made to secure a good circulation of water in +these boilers by means of the “baffle-plates,” seen in the +sketch, which compel the water to flow as indicated by the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_341" id="Page_341">[341]</a></span> +arrows. The tubes are frequently made of brass or of copper, +to secure rapid transmission of heat to the water, and +thus to permit the use of a smaller area of heating-surface +and a smaller boiler. The steam-space is made as large as +possible, to secure immunity from “priming” or the “entrainment” +of water with the steam. This type of steam-boiler, +invented by Nathan Read, of Salem, Mass., in 1791, +and patented in April of that year, was the earliest of the +tubular boilers. In the locomotive boiler (<a href="#Fig109">Fig. 109</a>), as in +the preceding, the characteristics are a fire-box at one end +of the shell and a set of tubes through which the gases pass<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_342" id="Page_342">[342]</a></span> +directly to the smoke-stack. Strength, compactness, great +steaming capacity, fair economy, moderate cost, and convenience +of combination with the running parts, are secured +by the adoption of this form. It is frequently used also +for portable and stationary engines. It was invented in +France by M. Seguin, and in England by Booth, and used +by George Stephenson at about the same time—1828 or +1829.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig109" id="Fig109"></a> +<img src="images/illo369.png" alt="Stationary 'Locomotive' Boiler" width="498" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 109.</span>—Stationary “Locomotive” Boiler.</p></div> + +<p>Since the efficiency of a steam-boiler depends upon the +extent of effective heating-surface per unit of weight of +fuel burned in any given time—or, ordinarily, upon the +ratio of the areas of heating and grate surface—peculiar +expedients are sometimes adopted, having for their object +the increase of heating-surface, without change of form of +boiler and without proportionate increase of cost.</p> + +<div class="figright"><a name="Fig110" id="Fig110"> +</a><img src="images/illo370.png" alt="Galloway Conical Tube" width="300" height="153" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 110.</span></p></div> + +<p>One of these methods is that of the use of Galloway +conical tubes (<a href="#Fig110">Fig. 110</a>). These are very largely +used in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_343" id="Page_343">[343]</a></span> +Great Britain, but are seldom if ever seen in the United +States. The Cornish boiler, to which they are usually applied, +consists of a large cylindrical shell, 6 feet or more in +diameter, containing one tube of +about one-half as great dimensions, +or sometimes two of one-third +the diameter of the shell +each. Such boilers have a very +small ratio of heating to grate +surface, and their large tubes are +peculiarly liable to collapse. To remove these objections, +the Messrs. Galloway introduced stay-tubes into the flues, +which tubes are conical in form, and are set in either a vertical +or an inclined position, the larger end uppermost. +The area of heating-surface is thus greatly increased, and, +at the same time, the liability to collapse is reduced. The +same results are obtained by another device of Galloway, +which is sometimes combined with that just described in +the same boiler. Several sheets in the flue have “pockets” +worked into them, which pockets project into the flue-passage.</p> + +<p>Another device is that of an American engineer, Miller, +who surrounds the furnace of cylindrical and other boilers +with water-tubes. The “fuel-economizers” of Greene and +others consist of similar collections of tubes set in the flues, +between the boiler and the chimney.</p> + +<p>“<i>Sectional</i>” boilers are gradually coming into use with +high pressures, on account of their greater safety against +disastrous explosions. The earliest practicable example of +a boiler of this class was probably that of Colonel John Stevens, +of Hoboken, N. J. Dr. Alban, who, forty years later, +attempted to bring this type into general use, and constructed +a number of such boilers, did not succeed. Their +introduction, like that of all radical changes in engineering, +has been but slow, and it has been only recently that their +manufacture has become an important branch of industry.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_344" id="Page_344">[344]</a></span></p> + +<p>A committee of the American Institute, of which the +author was chairman, in 1871, examined several boilers of +this and the ordinary type, and tested them very carefully. +They reported that they felt “confident that the introduction +of this class of steam-boilers will do much toward the +removal of the cause of that universal feeling of distrust +which renders the presence of a steam-boiler so objectionable +in every locality. The difficulties in thoroughly inspecting +these boilers, in regulating their action, and other +faults of the class, are gradually being overcome, and the +committee look forward with confidence to the time when +their use will become general, to the exclusion of older and +more dangerous forms of steam-boilers.”</p> + +<p>The economical performance of these boilers with a similar +ratio of heating to grate surface is equal to that of +other kinds. In fact, they are usually given a somewhat +higher ratio, and their economy of fuel frequently exceeds +that of the other types. Their principal defect is their +small capacity for steam and water, which makes it extremely +difficult to obtain steady steam-pressure. Where +they are employed, the feed and draught should be, if possible, +controlled by automatic attachments, and the feed-water +heated to the highest attainable temperature. Their +satisfactory working depends, more than in other cases, on +the ability of the fireman, and can only be secured by the +exercise of both care and skill.</p> + +<p>Many forms of these boilers have been devised. Walter +Hancock constructed boilers for his steam-carriage of +flat plates connected by stay-bolts, several such sections +composing the boiler; and about the same time (1828) Sir +Goldsworthy Gurney constructed for a similar purpose boilers +consisting of a steam and a water reservoir, placed one +above the other, and connected by triangularly-bent water-tubes +exposed to the heat of the furnace-gases. Jacob Perkins +made many experiments looking to the employment of +very high steam-pressures, and in 1831 patented a boiler of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_345" id="Page_345">[345]</a></span> +this class, in which the heating-surfaces nearest the fire were +composed of iron tubes, which tubes also served as grate-bars. +The steam and water space was principally comprised +within a comparatively large chamber, of which the +walls were secured by closely distributed stay-bolts. For +extremely high pressures, boilers composed only of tubes +were used. Dr. Ernst Alban described the boiler already +referred to, and its construction and operation, and stated +that he had experimented with pressures as high as 1,000 +pounds to the square inch.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig111" id="Fig111"></a> +<img src="images/illo372.png" alt="Harrison's Sectional Boiler" width="385" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 111.</span>—Harrison’s Sectional Boiler.</p></div> + +<p>The Harrison steam-boiler, which has been many years +in use in the United States, consists of several sections, each +of which is made up of hollow globes of cast-iron, communicating +with each other by necks cast upon the spheres, +and fitted together with faced joints. Long bolts, extending +from end to end of each row, bind the spheres together. +(<i>See</i> <a href="#Fig111">Fig. 111</a>.)</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig112" id="Fig112"></a> +<img src="images/illo373.png" alt="Babcock & Wilcock's Sectionasl Boiler" width="450" height="286" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 112.</span>—Babcock and Wilcox’s Sectional Boiler.</p></div> + +<p>An example of another modern type in extensive use is +given in <a href="#Fig112">Fig. 112</a>, a semi-sectional boiler, which consists of +a series of inclined wrought-iron tubes, connected by T-heads,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_346" id="Page_346">[346]</a></span> +which form the vertical water-channels, at each end. +The joints are faced by milling them, and then ground so +perfectly tight that a pressure of 500 pounds to the square +inch is insufficient to produce leakage. No packing is used. +The fire is made under the front and higher end of the +tubes, and the products of combustion pass up between the +tubes into a combustion-chamber under the steam and water +drum; hence they pass down between the tubes, then once +more up through the space between the tubes, and off to +the chimney. The steam is taken out at the top of the +steam-drum near the back end of the boiler. The rapid +circulation prevents to some extent the formation of deposits +or incrustations upon the heating-surfaces, sweeping +them away and depositing them in the mud-drum, whence +they are blown out. Rapid circulation of water, as has +been shown by Prof. Trowbridge, also assists in the extraction +of the heat from the gases, by the presentation +of fresh water continually, as well as by the prevention of +incrustation.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig113" id="Fig113"></a> +<img src="images/illo374.png" alt="Root Sectional Boiler" width="350" height="389" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 113.</span>—Root Sectional Boiler.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_347" id="Page_347">[347]</a></span>Attempts have been made to adapt sectional boilers to +marine engines; but very little progress has yet been made +in their introduction. The Root sectional boiler (<a href="#Fig113">Fig. 113</a>), +an American design, which is in extensive use in the United +States and Europe, has also been experimentally placed in +service on shipboard. Its heating-surface consists wholly +of tubes, which are connected by a peculiarly formed +series of caps; the joints are made tight with rubber +“grummets.”</p> + + +<hr class="c05" /> +<h4><span class="smcap">Section II.—Portable and Locomotive Engines.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>Engines and boilers, when of small size, are now often +combined in one structure which may be readily transported. +Where they have a common base-plate simply, as in +<a href="#Fig114">Fig. 114</a>, they are called, usually, “semi-portable engines.” +These little engines have some decided advantages. Being +attached to one base, the combined engine and boiler is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_348" id="Page_348">[348]</a></span> +easily transported, occupies little space, and may very +readily be mounted upon wheels, rendering it peculiarly +well adapted for agricultural purposes.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig114" id="Fig114"></a> +<img src="images/illo375.png" alt="Semi-Portable Engine" width="350" height="431" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 114.</span>—Semi-Portable Engine, 1878.</p></div> + +<p>The example here shown differs in its design from those +usually seen in the market. The engine is not fastened to +or upon the boiler, and is therefore not affected by expansion, +nor are the bearings overheated by conduction or by +ascending heat from the boiler. The fly-wheel is at the +base, which arrangement secures steadiness at the high +speed which is a requisite for economy of fuel. The boilers +are of the upright tubular style, with internal fire-box,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_349" id="Page_349">[349]</a></span> +and are intended to be worked at 150 pounds pressure per +inch. They are fitted with a baffle-plate and circulating-pipe, +to prevent priming, and also with a fusible plug, which will +melt and prevent the crown-sheet of the boiler burning, if +the water gets low.</p> + +<p>Another illustration of this form of engine, as built in +small sizes, is seen <a href="#Fig115">below</a>. The peculiarity of this engine +is, that the cylinder is placed in the top of the boiler, which +is upright. By this arrangement the engine is constantly +drawing from the boiler the hottest and driest steam, and +there is thus no liability of serious loss by condensation, +which is rapid, even in a short pipe, when the engine is +separate from the boiler.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig115" id="Fig115"></a> +<img src="images/illo376.png" alt="Semi-Portable Engine" width="208" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 115.</span>—Semi-Portable Engine, 1878.</p></div> + +<p>The engine illustrated is rated at 10 horse-power, and +makers are always expected to guarantee their machines to<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_350" id="Page_350">[350]</a></span> +work up to the rated power. The cylinder is 7 by 7 inches, +and the main shaft is directly over it. On this shaft are +three eccentrics, one working the pump, one moving the +valves, and the third one operating the cut-off. The driving-pulley +is 20 inches in diameter, and the balance-wheel +30 inches. The boiler has 15 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span>-inch flues. It is furnished +with a heater in its lower portion. The boiler of this engine +is tested up to 200 pounds, and is calculated to carry +100 pounds working pressure, though that is not necessary +to develop the full power of the engine. The compactness +of the whole machine is exceptional. It can be set up in a +space 5 feet square and 8 feet high. The weight of the 10 +horse-power engine is 1,540 pounds, and of the whole machine +4,890 pounds, boxed for shipment. Every part of the +mechanism usually fits and works with the exactness of a +gun-lock, as each piece is carefully made to gauge.</p> + +<p>Portable engines are those which are especially intended +to be moved conveniently from place to place. The engine +is usually attached to the boiler, and the feed-pump is generally +attached to the engine. The whole machine is carried +on wheels, and is moved from one place to another, +usually by horses, but sometimes by its own engine, which +is coupled by an engaging and disengaging apparatus to +the rear-wheels. English builders have usually excelled in +the construction of this class of steam-engine, although it is +probable that the best American engines are fully equal to +them in design, material, and construction.</p> + +<p>The later work of the best-known English builders has +given economical results that have surprised engineers. +The annual “shows” of the Royal Agricultural Society +have elicited good evidence of skill in management as well +as of excellence of design and construction. Some little +portable engines have exhibited an economical efficiency +superior to that of the largest marine engines of any but +the compound type, and even closely competing with that +form. The causes of this remarkable economy are readily<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_351" id="Page_351">[351]</a></span> +learned by an inspection of these engines, and by observation +of the method of managing them at the test-trial. +The engines are usually very carefully designed. The cylinders +are nicely proportioned to their work, and their pistons +travel at high speed. Their valve-gear consists usually +of a plain slide-valve, supplemented by a separate expansion-slide, +driven by an independent eccentric, and capable +of considerable variation in the point of cut-off. This form +of expansion-gear is very effective—almost as much so as a +drop cut-off—at the usual grade of expansion, which is not +far from four times. The governor is usually attached to a +throttle-valve in the steam-pipe, an arrangement which is +not the best possible under variable loads, but which produces +no serious loss of efficiency when the engine is driven, +as at competitive trials, under the very uniform load of a +Prony strap-brake and at very nearly the maximum capacity +of the machine. The most successful engines have had +steam-jacketed cylinders—always an essential to maximum +economy—with high steam and a considerable expansion. +The boilers are strongly made, and are, as are also +all other heated surfaces, carefully clothed with non-conducting +material, and well lagged over all. The details +are carefully proportioned, the rods and frames are strong +and well secured together, and the bearings have large rubbing-surfaces. +The connecting-rods are long and easy-working, +and every part is capable of doing its work without +straining and with the least friction.</p> + +<p>In handling the engines at the competitive trial, most +experienced and skillful drivers are selected. The difference +between the performances of the same engine in different +hands has been found to amount to from 10 to 15 per cent., +even where the competitors were both considered exceptionally +skillful men. In manipulating the engine, the fires +are attended to with the utmost care; coal is thrown upon +them at regular and frequent intervals, and a uniform depth +of fuel and a perfectly clean fire are secured. The sides<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_352" id="Page_352">[352]</a></span> +and corners of the fire are looked after with especial care. +The fire-doors are kept open the least possible time; not a +square inch of grate-surface is left unutilized, and every +pound of coal gives out its maximum of calorific power, and +in precisely the place where it is needed. Feed-water is +supplied as nearly as possible continuously, and with the +utmost regularity. In some cases the engine-driver stands +by his engine constantly, feeding the fire with coal in handfuls, +and supplying the water to the heater by hand by +means of a cup. Heaters are invariably used in such cases. +The exhaust is contracted no more than is absolutely necessary +for draught. The brake is watched carefully, lest +irregularity of lubrication should cause oscillation of speed +with the changing resistance. The load is made the maximum +which the engine is designed to drive with economy. +Thus all conditions are made as favorable as possible to +economy, and they are preserved as invariable as the utmost +care on the part of the attendant can make them.</p> + +<p>These trials are usually of only three or five hours’ duration, +and thus terminate before it becomes necessary to +clean fires. The following are results obtained at the trial +of engines which took place in July, 1870, at the Oxford +Agricultural Fair:</p> + +<table class="fsize80" summary="Oxford Agric. Fair Results"> + +<tr> +<td rowspan="2" class="center bt br">MAKER’S NAME AND<br />RESIDENCE</td> +<td colspan="3" class="center bt br bb smcap">Cylinders.</td> +<td rowspan="2" class="center bt br padr1 padl1">Stroke.</td> +<td colspan="2" class="center bt br bb smcap">Horse-Power.</td> +<td rowspan="2" class="center bt br padr1 padl1">Point of<br />cut off.</td> +<td colspan="2" rowspan="2" class="center bt br padr1 padl1">Revolutions<br />per minute.</td> +<td rowspan="2" class="center bt padr1 padl1">Pounds coal<br />per horse-power<br />per hour.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center padr1 padl1 bt br">Number.</td> +<td colspan="2" class="center padr1 padl1 bt br">Diameter.</td> +<td class="center padr1 padl1 bt br">Nominal.</td> +<td class="center padr1 padl1 bt br">Dynamo-<br />metric.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td colspan="2" class="center bt br">Inches.</td> +<td class="center bt br">In.</td> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td colspan="2" class="bt br"> </td> +<td class="bt"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Clayton, Shuttleworth & Co., Lincoln</td> +<td class="center br">1</td> +<td class="right padl1">7</td> +<td class="br"> </td> +<td class="center br">12</td> +<td class="center br">4</td> +<td class="center br">4.42</td> +<td class="center br">.....</td> +<td class="right padr0">121.6</td> +<td class="left br padl0 padr1">5</td> +<td class="center">3.73</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Brown & May, Devizes</td> +<td class="center br">1</td> +<td class="right">7</td> +<td class="left br"><span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">16</span></td> +<td class="center br">12</td> +<td class="center br">4</td> +<td class="center br">4.19</td> +<td class="center br">11.48</td> +<td class="right padr0">125.6</td> +<td class="left br padl0">5</td> +<td class="center">4.44</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br bb padr1">Reading Iron-Works Company, Reading</td> +<td class="center br bb">1</td> +<td class="right bb">5</td> +<td class="left br bb"><span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span></td> +<td class="center br bb">14</td> +<td class="center br bb">4</td> +<td class="center br bb">4.16</td> +<td class="center br bb">.....</td> +<td class="right padr0 bb">145.7</td> +<td class="br bb"> </td> +<td class="center bb">4.65</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_353" id="Page_353">[353]</a></span>These were horizontal engines, attached to locomotive +boilers.</p> + +<p>At a similar exhibition held at Bury, in 1867, considerably +better results even than these were reported, as below, +from engines of similar size and styles:</p> + +<table class="fsize80" summary="Bury Results"> + +<tr> +<td rowspan="2" class="center bt br">MAKER’S NAME AND<br />RESIDENCE</td> +<td colspan="3" class="center bt br bb smcap">Cylinders.</td> +<td rowspan="2" class="center bt br padr1 padl1">Stroke.</td> +<td colspan="2" class="center bt br bb smcap">Horse-Power.</td> +<td colspan="2" rowspan="2" class="center bt br padr1 padl1">Point of<br />cut off.</td> +<td rowspan="2" class="center bt br padr1 padl1">Revolutions<br />per minute.</td> +<td rowspan="2" class="center bt padr1 padl1">Pounds coal<br />per horse-power<br />per hour.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center padr1 padl1 bt br">Number.</td> +<td colspan="2" class="center padr1 padl1 bt br">Diameter.</td> +<td class="center padr1 padl1 bt br">Nominal.</td> +<td class="center padr1 padl1 bt br">Dynamo-<br />metric.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td colspan="2" class="center bt br">Inches.</td> +<td class="center bt br">In.</td> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td colspan="2" class="bt br"> </td> +<td class="bt br"> </td> +<td class="bt"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Clayton, Shuttleworth & Co., Lincoln.</td> +<td class="center br">1</td> +<td class="right">10</td> +<td class="br"> </td> +<td class="center br">20</td> +<td class="center br">10</td> +<td class="center br">11.00</td> +<td class="right">3.1</td> +<td class="left padl0 br">0</td> +<td class="right padr4 br"> 71.5</td> +<td class="center">4.13</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br bb padr1">Reading Iron-Works Company, Reading.</td> +<td class="center br bb">1</td> +<td class="right bb">8</td> +<td class="left br bb"><span class="enum">5</span>∕<span class="denom">8</span></td> +<td class="center br bb">20</td> +<td class="center br bb">10</td> +<td class="center br bb">10.43</td> +<td class="right bb">1.4</td> +<td class="br bb"> </td> +<td class="right padr4 br bb">109.4</td> +<td class="center bb">4.22</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>With all these engines steam-jackets were used; the +feed-water was highly and uniformly heated by exhaust-steam; +the coal was selected, finely broken, and thrown on +the fire with the greatest care; the velocity of the engines, +the steam-pressure, and the amount of feed-water, +were very carefully regulated, and all bearings were run +quite loose; the engine-drivers were usually expert “jockeys.”</p> + +<p>The next <a href="#Fig116">illustration</a> represents the portable steam-engine +as built by one of the oldest and most experienced +manufacturers of such engines in the United States.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig116" id="Fig116"></a> +<img src="images/illo381.png" alt="Portable Steam-Engine" width="459" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 116.</span>—The Portable Steam-Engine, 1878.</p></div> + +<p>In the boilers of these engines the heating-surface is +given less extent than in the stationary engine-boiler, but +much greater than in the locomotive, and varies from 10 to +20 square feet per horse-power. The boilers are made very +strong, to enable them to withstand the strains due to the +attached engine, which are estimated as equivalent to from +one-tenth to one-fifth that due to the steam-pressure. The<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_354" id="Page_354">[354]</a></span> +boiler is sometimes given even double the strength usual +with stationary boilers of similar capacity. The engine is +mounted, in this example, directly over the boiler, and all +parts are in sight and readily accessible to the engineer.</p> + +<p>One of these engines, of 20 horse-power, has a steam-cylinder +10 inches in diameter and 18 inches stroke of piston,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_355" id="Page_355">[355]</a></span> +making 125 revolutions per minute, and has 9 square +feet of grate-surface and 288 feet of heating-surface. It +weighs about 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons. Steam is carried at 125 pounds.</p> + +<p>In the class of engines just described, the draught is +obtained by the blast of the exhaust-steam which is led +into the chimney. Such engines are now sold at from $120 +to $150 per horse-power, according to size and quality, the +smaller engines costing most. The usual consumption of +fuel is from 4 to 6 pounds per hour and per horse-power, +burning from 15 to 20 pounds on each square foot of grate, +and each pound evaporating about 8 pounds of water. A +usual weight is, for the larger sizes, 500 pounds per horse-power.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig117" id="Fig117"></a> +<img src="images/illo382.png" alt="Thrashers' Road Engine" width="448" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 117.</span>—The Thrashers’ Road-Engine, 1878.</p></div> + +<p>These engines are sometimes arranged to propel themselves,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_356" id="Page_356">[356]</a></span> +as in the Mills “Thrashers’” road-engine or locomotive, +of which the accompanying <a href="#Fig117">engraving</a> is a good representation. +This engine is proportioned for hauling a tank +containing 10 barrels, or more, of water and a grain-separator +over all ordinary roads, and to drive a thrashing-machine +or saw-mill, developing 20 or 25 horse-power. This +example of the road-engine has a boiler built to work at +250 pounds of steam; the engine is designed for a maximum +power of 30 horses.</p> + +<p>This engine has a balanced valve and automatic cut-off, +and is fitted with a reversing-gear for use on the road. +The driving-wheels are of wrought-iron, 56 inches diameter +and 8 inches wide, with cast-iron driving-arms. Both +wheels are drivers on curves as well as on straight lines. +The engine is guided and fired by one man, and the total +weight is so small that it will pass safely over any good +country bridge. A brake is attached, to insure safety when +going down-hill. Although designed to move at a speed +of about three miles per hour, the velocity of the piston +may be increased so that four miles per hour may be accomplished +when necessary.</p> + +<p>This is an excellent example of this kind of engine as +constructed at the present time. The strongly-built boiler, +with its heater, the jacketed cylinder, and light, strong +frame of the engine, the steel running-gear, the carefully-covered<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_357" id="Page_357">[357]</a></span> +surfaces of cylinder and boiler, and excellent proportions +of details, are illustrations of good modern engineering, +and are in curious contrast with the first of the +class, built a century earlier by Smeaton.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig118" id="Fig118"></a> +<img src="images/illo383.png" alt="Fisher's Steam Carriage" width="500" height="242" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 118.</span>—Fisher’s Steam-Carriage.</p></div> + +<p>Steam-carriages for passengers are now rarely built. +<a href="#Fig118">Fig. 118</a> represents that designed by Fisher about 1870 +or earlier. It was only worked experimentally.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig119" id="Fig119"></a> +<img src="images/illo384.png" alt="Road and Farm Engine" width="504" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 119.</span>—Road and Farm Locomotive.</p></div> + +<p>The <a href="#Fig119">above</a> is an engraving of a road and farm locomotive +as built by one of the most successful among several +British firms engaged in this work.</p> + +<p>The capacity of these engines has been determined by +experiment by the author in the United States, and abroad +by several distinguished engineers.</p> + +<p>The author made a trial of one of these engines at South +Orange, N. J., to determine its power, speed, and convenience +of working and manœuvring. The following were +the principal dimensions:</p> + +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_358" id="Page_358">[358]</a></p> + +<table class="fsize80" summary="Principal Dimensions"> + +<tr style="line-height: .1em;"> +<td style="width: 3.5em;"> </td> +<td style="width: 4em;"> </td> +<td style="width: 12em;"> </td> +<td style="width: 2em;"> </td> +<td style="width: 1em;"> </td> +<td style="width: 4em;"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="left">Weight of engine, complete, 5 tons 4 cwt.</td> +<td class="right">11,648</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">pounds.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="left">Steam-cylinder—diameter</td> +<td class="right">7</td> +<td class="left"><span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span></td> +<td class="left padl1">inches.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="left">Stroke of piston</td> +<td class="right">10</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">inches.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="left">Revolution of crank to one of driving-wheels</td> +<td class="right">17</td> +<td colspan="2"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="left">Driving-wheels—</td> +<td class="left">diameter</td> +<td class="right">60</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">inches.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="center">„</td> +<td class="left">breadth of tire</td> +<td class="right">10</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">inches.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="center">„</td> +<td class="left">weight, each</td> +<td class="right">450</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">pounds.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left">Boiler—</td> +<td colspan="2" class="left">length over all</td> +<td class="right">8</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">feet.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td colspan="2" class="left">diameter of shell</td> +<td class="right">30</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">feet.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td colspan="2" class="left">thickness of shell</td> +<td class="right"><span class="enum">7</span>∕<span class="denom">16</span></td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">inch.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center">„</td> +<td colspan="2" class="left padr1">fire-box sheets, outside, thickness</td> +<td class="right"><span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span></td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">inch.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="left">Load on driving-wheels, 4 tons 10 cwt.</td> +<td class="right">10,080</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="left padl1">pounds.</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>The boiler was of the ordinary locomotive type, and +the engine was mounted upon it, as is usual with portable +engines.</p> + +<p>The steam-cylinder was steam-jacketed, in accordance +with the most advanced practice here and abroad. The +crank-shaft and other wrought-iron parts subjected to heavy +strains were strong and plainly finished. The gearing was +of malleableized cast-iron, and all bearings, from crank-shaft +to driving-wheel, on each side, were carried by a single +sheet of half-inch plate, which also formed the sides of +the fire-box exterior.</p> + +<p>The following is a summary of the conclusions deduced +by the author from the trial, and published in the <i>Journal +of the Franklin Institute</i>: A traction-engine may be so +constructed as to be easily and rapidly manœuvred on the +common road; and an engine weighing over 5 tons may be +turned continuously without difficulty on a circle of 18 feet +radius, or even on a road but little wider than the length +of the engine. A locomotive of 5 tons 4 hundredweight +has been constructed, capable of drawing on a good road +23,000 pounds up a grade of 533 feet to the mile, at the rate +of four miles an hour; and one might be constructed to +draw more than 63,000 pounds up a grade of 225 feet to +the mile, at the rate of two miles an hour.</p> + +<p>It was further shown that the coefficient of traction<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_359" id="Page_359">[359]</a></span> +with heavily-laden wagons on a good macadamized road +is not far from .04; the traction-power of this engine is +equal to that of 20 horses; the weight, exclusive of the +weight of the engine, that could be drawn on a level road, +was 163,452 pounds; and the amount of fuel required is +estimated at 500 pounds a day. The advantages claimed +for the traction-engine over horse-power are: no necessity +for a limitation of working-hours; a difference in first cost +in favor of steam; and in heavy work on a common road +the expense by steam is less than 25 per cent. of the average +cost of horse-power, a traction-engine capable of doing the +work of 25 horses being worked at as little expense as 6 or +8 horses. The cost of hauling heavy loads has been estimated +at 7 cents per ton per mile.</p> + +<p>Such engines are gradually becoming useful in steam-ploughing. +Two systems are adopted. In the one the engine +is stationary, and hauls a “gang” of ploughs by means +of a windlass and wire rope; in the other the engine traverses +a field, drawing behind it a plough or a gang of +ploughs. The latter method has been proposed for breaking +up prairie-land.</p> + +<p>Thus, thirty years after the defeat of the intelligent, +courageous, and persistent Hancock and his coworkers in +the scheme of applying the steam-engine usefully on the +common road, we find strong indications that, in a new +form, the problem has been again attacked, and at least +partially solved.</p> + +<p>One of the most important of the prerequisites to ultimate +success in the substitution of steam for animal power +on the highway is that our roads shall be well made. As +the greatest care and judgment are exercised, and an immense +outlay of capital is considered justifiable, in securing +easy grades and a smooth track on our railroad routes, we +may readily believe that similar precaution and outlay will +be found advisable in adapting the common road to the +road-locomotive. It would seem to the engineer that the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_360" id="Page_360">[360]</a></span> +natural obstacles generally supposed to stand in the way +have, after all, no real existence. The principal inconvenience +that may be anticipated will probably arise from the +carelessness or avarice of proprietors, which may sometimes +cause them to appoint ignorant and inefficient engine-drivers, +giving them charge of what are always excellent servants, +but terrible masters. Nevertheless, as the transportation +of passengers on railroads is found to be attended +with less liability to loss of life or injury of person than +their carriage by stage-coach, it will be found, very probably, +that the general use of steam in transporting freight +on common roads may be attended with less risk to life or +property than to-day attends the use of horse-power.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Steam Fire-Engine</span> is still another form of portable +engine. It is also one of the latest of all applications of +steam-power. The steam fire-engine is peculiarly an American +production. Although previously attempted, their +permanently successful introduction has only occurred within +the last fifteen years.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig120" id="Fig120"></a> +<img src="images/illo388.png" alt="Latta Steam Fire-Engine" width="474" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 120.</span>—The Latta Steam Fire-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>As early as 1830, Braithwaite and Ericsson, of London, +England, built an engine with steam and pump cylinders of +7 and 6<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches diameter, respectively, with 16 inches stroke +of piston. This machine weighed 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> tons, and is said to have +thrown 150 gallons of water per minute to a height of between +80 and 100 feet. It was ready for work in about 20 +minutes after lighting the fire. Braithwaite afterward supplied +a more powerful engine to the King of Prussia, in +1832. The first attempt made in the United States to construct +a steam fire-engine was probably that of Hodge, who +built one in New York in 1841. It was a strong and very effective +machine, but was far too heavy for rapid transportation. +The late J. K. Fisher, who throughout his life persistently +urged the use of steam-carriages and traction-engines, +designing and building several, also planned a steam fire-engine. +Two were built from his design by the Novelty +Works, New York, about 1860, for Messrs. Lee & Larned.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_361" id="Page_361">[361]</a></span> +They were “self-propellers,” and one of them, built for the +city of Philadelphia, was sent to that city over the highway, +driven by its own engines. The other was built for and used +by the New York Fire Department, and did good service for +several years. These engines were heavy, but very powerful, +and were found to move at good speed under steam<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_362" id="Page_362">[362]</a></span> +and to manœuvre well. The Messrs. Latta, of Cincinnati, +soon after succeeded in constructing comparatively light +and very effective engines, and the fire department of that +city was the first to adopt steam fire-engines definitely as +their principal reliance. This change has now become general.</p> + +<p>The steam fire-engine has now entirely displaced the old +hand-engine in all large cities. It does its work at a fraction +of the cost of the latter. It can force its water to a +height of 225 feet, and to a distance of more than 300 feet +horizontally, while the hand-engine can seldom throw it +one-third these distances; and the “steamer” may be relied +upon to work at full power many hours if necessary, while +the men at the hand-engine soon become fatigued, and require +frequent relief. The city of New York has 40 steam +fire-engines. One engine to every 10,000 inhabitants is a +proper proportion.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig121" id="Fig121"></a> +<img src="images/illo390.png" alt="Amoskeag Engine, Section" width="484" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 121.</span>—The Amoskeag Engine. Section.</p></div> + +<p>In the standard steam fire-engine (<a href="#Fig120">Fig. 120</a>) reciprocating +engines and pumps are adopted, as seen in section in +<a href="#Fig121">Fig. 121</a>, in which <i>A</i> is the furnace, and <i>B</i> the set of closely-set +vertical fire-tubes in the boiler. <i>C</i> is the combustion-chamber, +<i>D</i> the smoke-pipe, and <i>R</i> the steam-space. +<i>E</i> is the steam-cylinder, and <i>F</i> the pump, which is seen to +be double-acting. There are two pairs of engines and +pumps, working on cranks, set at right angles, and turning +a balance-wheel seen behind them. <i>G</i> is the feed-pump +which supplies water to the boiler, <i>H</i> the air-chamber which +equalizes the water-pressure, which reaches it through the +pipe, <i>I J</i>. <i>K</i> is the feed-water tank, under the driver’s +seat, <i>L</i>, which, with the engines and boiler, are carried on +the frame, <i>M M</i>. The fireman stands on the platform, <i>N</i>. +When it is necessary to move the machine, an endless +chain connects the crank-shaft with the rear-wheels, and +the engine, with pumps shut off, is thus made to drive the +wheels at any desired speed.</p> + +<p>A self-propelling engine by the Amoskeag Company<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_363" id="Page_363">[363]</a></span> +had the following dimensions and performance: Weight, 4 +tons; speed, 8 miles per hour; steam-pressure, 75 pounds +per square inch; height of stream from 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span>-inch nozzle, 225 +feet; 1<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span>-inch nozzle, +150 feet; distance horizontally, 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span>-inch<span +class='pagenum'><a name="Page_365" id="Page_365">[364-365]</a></span><span class='pagenum'><a +name="Page_364" id="Page_364"></a></span> +nozzle, 300 feet; 1<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span>-inch, 250 feet—a performance +which contrasts wonderfully with that of the hand-worked +fire-engine which these engines have now superseded.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig122" id="Fig122"></a> +<img src="images/illo391.png" alt="Silsby Rotary Steam Fire-Engine" width="553" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 122.</span>—The Silsby Rotary Steam Fire-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>It has recently become common to construct the steam +fire-engine with rotary engine and pump (<a href="#Fig122">Fig. 122</a>). The +superiority of a rotary motion for a steam-engine is apparently +so evident that many attempts have been made to +overcome the practical difficulties to which it is subject. +One of these difficulties, and the principal one, has been the +packing of the part which performs the office of the piston +in the straight cylinder. Robert Stephenson once expressed +the opinion that a rotary engine would never be made to +work successfully, on account of this difficulty of packing. +The most palpable of the advantages of the rotary engine +are the reduction in the size of the engine, claimed to result +from the great velocity of the piston; the avoidance +of great accidental strains, especially noticed in propelling +ships; and a great saving of the power which is asserted to +be expended in the reciprocating engine in overcoming the +inertia while changing the direction of the motions. These +advantages adapt the rotary engine, in an especial manner, +to the driving of a locomotive or steam fire-engine.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig123" id="Fig123"></a> +<img src="images/illo392.png" alt="Rotary Steam-Engine" width="350" height="221" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 123.</span>—Rotary Steam-Engine.</p></div> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig124" id="Fig124"></a> +<img src="images/illo393.png" alt="Rotary Pump" width="350" height="241" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 124.</span>—Rotary Pump.</p></div> + +<p>In the Holly rotary engine, seen in <a href="#Fig123">Fig. 123</a>, eccentrics +and sliding-cams, which are frequently used in rotary engines,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_366" id="Page_366">[366]</a></span> +and which are objectionable on account of their great +friction, are avoided. Corrugated pistons, or irregular +cams, <i>C D</i>, are adopted, forming chambers within the cases. +In the engine the steam enters at <i>A</i>, at the bottom of the +case, and presses the cams apart. The only packing used +is in the ends of the long metal cogs, which are ground to +fit the case and are kept out by the momentum of the cams, +assisted by a slight spring back of the packing-pieces. The +friction on the pump (<a href="#Fig124">Fig. 124</a>) is said to be less than in +the engine. This is the reason given in support of the +claim that the rotary engine forces water to a given distance +with from one-fourth to one-third the steam-pressure +necessary to drive all reciprocating engines. The smaller +amount of power necessary to do the work, the less strain +and consequent wear and tear upon the whole machine, are +said to make it more durable and reliable. The pump being +chambered, its liability to injury by the use of dirty or +gritty water is lessened, and it is stated that it will last for +years, pumping gritty water that would soon cut out a piston-pump. +The pump used with this engine is, as shown in the +above illustration, somewhat similar to the rotary engine +driving it. Each of the revolving pistons has three long +teeth bearing against the cylinder, and packed, to prevent +leakage, like the engine-cams. They are carried on steel<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_367" id="Page_367">[367]</a></span> +shafts coupled to the engine-shafts. The water enters at +<i>E</i> and is discharged at <i>F</i>, and the passages are purposely +made large in order that sand, chips, and dirt, which may +enter with the water, may pass through.</p> + +<p>The rotary engine is gradually coming into use for various +special purposes, where small power is called for, and +where economy of fuel is not important; but it has never +yet competed, and may perhaps never in the future compete, +with the reciprocating-piston engine where large engines +are required, or where even moderate economy of fuel is +essential. This form of engine has assumed so little importance, +in fact, in the application of the steam-engine, +that comparatively little is known of its history. Watt invented +a rotary engine, and Yule many years afterward +(1836) constructed such engines at Glasgow. Lamb patented +another in 1842, Behrens still another in 1847. Napier, +Hall, Massey, Holly, La France, and others, have +built engines of this class in later times. Nearly all consist +either of cams rotating in gear, as in those above +sketched, or of a piston set radially in a cylinder of small +diameter, which turns on its axis within a much larger cylinder +set eccentrically, the piston, as the former turns, sliding +in and out of the smaller cylinder as its outer edge +slides in contact with the inner surface of the larger. In +some forms of rotary engine, a piston revolves on a central +shaft, and a sliding abutment in the external cylinder serves +to separate the steam from the exhaust side and to confine +the steam expanding while doing work. Nearly all of +these combinations are also used as pumps.</p> + +<p>Fire-engines, made by the best-known American builders +of engines, with reciprocating engines and pumps, such +as are in general use in the United States, have become +standard in general plan and arrangement of details. These +are probably the best illustrations of extreme lightness, +combined with strength of parts and working power, which +have ever been produced in any branch of mechanical engineering.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_368" id="Page_368">[368]</a></span> +By using a small boiler crowded with heating-surface, +very carefully proportioned and arranged, and +with small water-spaces; by adopting steel for running-gear +and working parts wherever possible; by working at +high piston-speed and with high steam-pressure; by selecting +fuel with extreme care—by all these expedients, the +steam fire-engine has been brought, in this country, to a +state of efficiency far superior to anything seen elsewhere. +Steam is raised with wonderful promptness, even from cold +water, and water is thrown from the nozzle at the end of +long lines of hose to great distances. But this combination +of lightness with power is only attained at the expense of +a certain regularity of action which can only be secured by +greater water and steam capacity in the boiler. The small +quantity of water contained within the boiler makes it necessary +to give constant attention to the feed, and the tendency, +almost invariably observed, to serious foaming and +priming not only compels unintermitted care while running, +but even introduces an element of danger which is not to +be despised, even though the machine be in charge of the +most experienced and skillful attendants. Even the greatest +care, directed by the utmost skill, would not avail to prevent +frequent explosions, were it not for the fact that it rarely, +if ever, happens that accidents to such boilers occur from +low water, unless the boiler is actually completely emptied +of water. In driving them at fires, they frequently foam so +violently that it is utterly impossible to obtain any clew to +the amount of water present, and the attendant usually +keeps his feed-pump on and allows the foaming to go on. +As long as water is passing into the boiler it is very unlikely +that any portion will become overheated and that accident +will occur. Such management appears very reckless, and +yet accident from such a cause is exceedingly rare.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig125" id="Fig125"></a> +<img src="images/illo396.png" alt="Tank-Engine, N. Y. Elevated Railroad" width="444" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 125.</span>—Tank-Engine, New York Elevated Railroad.</p></div> + +<p>The changes which have been made in <span class="smcap">Locomotive-Construction</span> +during the past few years have also been in +the direction of the refinement of the earlier designs, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_369" id="Page_369">[369]</a></span> +have been accompanied by corresponding changes in all +branches of railroad-work. The adjustment of parts to +each other and proportioning them to their work, the +modification of the minor details to suit changes of general +dimensions, the improvement of workmanship, and the +use of better material, have signalized this latest period. +Special forms of engine have been devised for special +kinds of work. Small, light tank-engines (<a href="#Fig125">Fig. 125</a>), carrying +their own fuel and water without “tenders,” are used +for moving cars about terminal stations and for making up +trains; powerful, heavy, slow-moving engines, of large +boiler-capacity and with small wheels, are used on steep +gradients and for hauling long trains laden with coal and +heavy merchandise; and hardly less powerful but quite +differently proportioned “express”-engines are used for +passenger and mail service.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig126" id="Fig126"></a> +<img src="images/illo397.png" alt="Forney's Tank-Locomotive" width="600" height="237" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 126.</span>—Forney’s Tank-Locomotive.</p></div> + +<p>A peculiar form of engine (<a href="#Fig126">Fig. 126</a>) has been designed +by Forney, in which the whole weight of engine, tender, +coal, and water, is carried by one frame and on one set of +wheels, the permanent weight falling on the driving-wheels +and the variable load on the truck. These engines have also +a comparatively short wheel-base and high pulling-power. +The lightest tank-engines of the first class mentioned +weigh 8 or 10 tons; but engines much lighter than these,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_370" id="Page_370">[370]</a></span> +even, are built for mines, where they are sent into the galleries +to bring out the coal-laden wagons. The heaviest +engines of this class attain weights of 20 or 30 tons. The +heaviest engine yet constructed in the United States is said +to be one in use on the Philadelphia & Reading Railroad,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_371" id="Page_371">[371]</a></span> +having a weight of about 100,000 pounds, which is carried +on 12 driving-wheels.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig127" id="Fig127"></a> +<img src="images/illo398.png" alt="British Express Engine" width="553" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 127.</span>—British Express Engine.</p></div> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig128" id="Fig128"></a> +<img src="images/illo399.png" alt="Baldwin Locomotive" width="600" height="259" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 128.</span>—The Baldwin Locomotive. Section.</p></div> + +<p>A locomotive has two steam-cylinders, either side by +side within the frame, and immediately beneath the forward +end of the boiler, or on each side and exterior to the frame. +The engines are non-condensing, and of the simplest possible +construction. The whole machine is carried upon strong but +flexible steel springs. The steam-pressure is usually more +than 100 pounds. The pulling-power is generally about one-fifth +the weight under most favorable conditions, and becomes +as low as one-tenth on wet rails. The fuel employed +is wood in new countries, coke in bituminous coal districts, +and anthracite coal in the eastern part of the United States. +The general arrangement and the proportions of locomotives +differ somewhat in different localities. In <a href="#Fig127">Fig. 127</a>, a British +express-engine, <i>O</i> is the boiler, <i>N</i> the fire-box, <i>X</i> the +grate, <i>G</i> the smoke-box, and <i>P</i> the chimney. <i>S</i> is a spring +and <i>R</i> a lever safety-valve, <i>T</i> is the whistle, <i>L</i> the throttle +or regulator valve, <i>E</i> the steam-cylinder, and <i>W</i> the driving-wheel. +The force-pump, <i>B C</i>, is driven from the cross-head, +<i>D</i>. The frame is the base of the whole system, and +all other parts are firmly secured to it. The boiler is made +fast at one end, and provision is made for its expansion +when heated. Adhesion is secured by throwing a proper<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_372" id="Page_372">[372]</a></span> +proportion of the weight upon the driving-wheel, <i>W</i>. This +is from about 6,000 pounds on standard freight-engines,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_373" id="Page_373">[373]</a></span> +having several pairs of drivers, to 10,000 pounds on passenger-engines, +per axle. The peculiarities of the American +type (<a href="#Fig128">Fig. 128</a>) are the truck, <i>I J</i>, or bogie, supporting the +forward part of the engine, the system of equalizers, or +beams which distribute the weight of the machine equally +over the several axles, and minor differences of detail. The +cab or house, <i>r</i>, protecting the engine-driver and fireman, is +an American device, which is gradually coming into use +abroad also. The American locomotive is distinguished by +its flexibility and ease of action upon even roughly-laid +roads. In the sketch, which shows a standard American +engine in section, <i>A B</i> is the boiler, <i>C</i> one of the steam-cylinders, +<i>D</i> the piston, <i>E</i> the cross-head, connected to the +crank-shaft, <i>F</i>, by the connecting-rod, <i>G H</i> the driving-wheels, +<i>I J</i> the truck-wheels, carrying the truck, <i>K L</i>; +<i>N N</i> is the fire-box, <i>O O</i> the tubes, of which but four are +shown. The steam-pipe, <i>R S</i>, leads the steam to the valve-chest, +<i>T</i>, in which is seen the valve, moved by the valve-gear, +<i>U V</i>, and the link, <i>W</i>. The link is raised or depressed +by a lever, <i>X</i>, moved from the cab. The safety-valve +is seen at the top of the dome, at <i>Y</i>, and the spring-balance +by which the load is adjusted is shown at <i>Z</i>. At <i>a</i> is the +cone-shaped exhaust-pipe, by which a good draught is secured. +The attachments <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>, <i>d</i>, <i>e</i>, <i>f</i>, <i>g</i>—whistle, steam-gauge, +sand-box, bell, head-light, and “cow-catcher”—are +nearly all peculiar, either in construction or location, to the +American locomotive. The cost of passenger-locomotives +of ordinary size is about $12,000; heavier engines sometimes +cost $20,000. The locomotive is usually furnished +with a tender, which carries its fuel and water. The standard +passenger-engine on the Pennsylvania Railroad has four +driving-wheels, 5<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet diameter; steam-cylinders, 17 inches +diameter and 2 feet stroke; grate-surface 15<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> square feet, +and heating-surface 1,058 square feet. It weighs 63,100 +pounds, of which 39,000 pounds are on the drivers and +24,100 on the truck. The freight-engine has six driving-wheels,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_374" id="Page_374">[374]</a></span> +54<span class="enum">5</span>∕<span class="denom">8</span> inches in diameter. The steam-cylinders are +18 inches in diameter, stroke 22 inches, grate-surface 14.8 +square feet, heating-surface 1,096 feet. It weighs 68,500 +pounds, of which 48,000 are on the drivers and 20,500 on +the truck. The former takes a train of five cars up an +average grade of 90 feet to the mile. The latter is attached<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_375" id="Page_375">[375]</a></span> +to a train of 11 cars. On a grade of 50 feet to the mile, +the former takes 7 and the latter 17 cars. Tank-engines +for very heavy work, such as on grades of 320 feet to the +mile, which are found on some of the mountain lines of +road, are made with five pairs of driving-wheels, and with +no truck. The steam-cylinders are 20<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">8</span> inches in diameter, +2 feet stroke; grate-area, 15<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> feet; heating-surface, 1,380 +feet; weight with tank full, and full supply of wood, +112,000 pounds; average weight, 108,000 pounds. Such +an engine has hauled 110 tons up this grade at the speed +of 5 miles an hour, the steam-pressure being 145 pounds. +The adhesion was about 23 per cent. of the weight.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig129" id="Fig129"></a> +<img src="images/illo401.png" alt="American Type of Express-Engine" width="566" height="250" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 129.</span>—The American Type of Express-Engine, 1878.</p></div> + +<p>In checking a train in motion, the inertia of the engine +itself absorbs a seriously large portion of the work of the +brakes. This is sometimes reduced by reversing the engine +and allowing the steam-pressure to act in aid of the brakes. +To avoid injury by abrasion of the surfaces of piston, cylinder, +and the valves and valve-seats, M. Le Chatelier introduces +a jet of steam into the exhaust-passages when +reversing, and thus prevents the ingress of dust-laden air +and the drying of the rubbing surfaces. This method of +checking a train is rarely resorted to, however, except in +case of danger. The introduction of the “continuous” or +“air” brake, which can be thrown into action in an instant +on every car of the train by the engine-driver, is so efficient +that it is now almost universally adopted. It is one of the +most important safeguards which American ingenuity has +yet devised. In drawing a train weighing 150 tons at the +rate of 60 miles an hour, about 800 effective horse-power is +required. A speed of 80 miles an hour has been often +attained, and 100 miles has probably been reached.</p> + +<p>The American locomotive-engine has a maximum life +which may be stated at about 30 years. The annual cost +of repairs is from 10 to 15 per cent. of its first cost. On +moderately level roads, the engine requires a pint of oil to +each 25 miles, and a ton of coal to each 40 or 50 miles run.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_376" id="Page_376">[376]</a></span> +One of the best-managed railroads in the United States reports +expenses as follows for one month:</p> + +<table class="fsize80" summary="Monthly Railroad Expenses"> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Number “train-miles” run per ton of coal burned</td> +<td class="right">53.95</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Number “train-miles” run per quart of oil used</td> +<td class="right">34.44</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Passenger-cars hauled 1 mile per ton of coal</td> +<td class="right">275.7</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Other cars hauled 1 mile per ton of coal</td> +<td class="right">634.8</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Cost repairs per mile run</td> +<td class="right">$2 43</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Cost fuel per mile run</td> +<td class="right">3 64</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Cost oil and waste per mile run</td> +<td class="right">62</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Cost wages of engine-men per mile run</td> +<td class="right">6 22</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">All other expenses per mile</td> +<td class="right">1 91</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="lr05">Total cost per “train-mile” run</td> +<td class="right">14 82</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>Although the above sketch and description represent +the construction and performance of the standard locomotive +of the present time, there are indications that the compound +arrangement of engines will ultimately be adopted. +This will involve a considerable change of proportions, +greatly increasing the volume and weight of steam-cylinders, +but enabling the designer to more than proportionally +decrease the weight of boiler and the quantity of +fuel carried. There is no serious objection to their use, +however, and no insuperable difficulty in the construction +of the “double-cylinder” type of engine for the locomotive. +A few such engines have already been put in service. +In these engines the high-pressure cylinder is placed +on one side and the larger low-pressure cylinder on the other +side of the locomotive, thus having but two cylinders, as in +the older plan. The valve-gear is the Stephenson link, as +in the ordinary engine. At starting, the steam is allowed +to act on both pistons; but after a few revolutions the +course of the steam is changed, and the exhaust from the +smaller cylinder, instead of passing into the chimney, is +sent to the larger cylinder, which is at the same time +cut off from the main steam-pipe. When the engine is +ascending a steep gradient the steam may, if necessary, be +taken from the boiler into both cylinders, as when starting.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_377" id="Page_377">[377]</a></span> +Compound engines of this kind have been used on the +French line of railroad from Bayonne to Biarritz. They +were designed by Mallet and built at Le Creuzot. The +steam-cylinders are of 9<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> and +15<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> inches diameter, and of +17<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> inches stroke of piston. The four driving-wheels are +4 feet in diameter, and the total weight of engine is 20 +tons. The boiler has 484<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> square feet of heating-surface, +and is built to carry 10 atmospheres pressure. When hauling +trains of 50 tons at 25 miles an hour, these engines require +about 15 pounds of good coal per mile.</p> + +<p>The total length of the railways in operation in the +United States on the 1st day of January, 1877, was 76,640 +miles,<a name="FNanchor_93_93" id="FNanchor_93_93"></a><a href="#Footnote_93_93" class="fnanchor">[93]</a> +being an average of one mile of railway for every +600 inhabitants. The railways are as follows:</p> + +<table class="fsize80" summary="U. S. Railroads 1877"> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td class="right br padr1">Miles.</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="right br padr1">Miles.</td> +<td> </td> +<td class="right">Miles.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Alabama</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,722</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Kentucky</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,464</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Ohio</td> +<td class="right">4,680</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Alaska</td> +<td class="right br padr1">0</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Louisiana</td> +<td class="right br padr1">539</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Oregon</td> +<td class="right">251</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Arizona</td> +<td class="right br padr1">0</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Maine</td> +<td class="right br padr1">987</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Pennsylvania</td> +<td class="right">5,896</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Arkansas</td> +<td class="right br padr1">787</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Maryland</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,092</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Rhode Island</td> +<td class="right">182</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">California</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,854</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Massachusetts</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,825</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">South Carolina</td> +<td class="right">1,352</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Colorado</td> +<td class="right br padr1">950</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Michigan</td> +<td class="right br padr1">3,437</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Tennessee</td> +<td class="right">1,638</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Connecticut</td> +<td class="right br padr1">925</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Minnesota</td> +<td class="right br padr1">2,024</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Texas</td> +<td class="right">2,072</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Dakota</td> +<td class="right br padr1">290</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Mississippi</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,028</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Utah</td> +<td class="right">486</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Delaware</td> +<td class="right br padr1">285</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Missouri</td> +<td class="right br padr1">3,016</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Vermont</td> +<td class="right">810</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Florida</td> +<td class="right br padr1">484</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Montana</td> +<td class="right br padr1">0</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Virginia</td> +<td class="right">1,648</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Georgia</td> +<td class="right br padr1">2,308</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Nebraska</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,181</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Washington</td> +<td class="right">110</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Idaho</td> +<td class="right br padr1">0</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Nevada</td> +<td class="right br padr1">714</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">West Virginia</td> +<td class="right">576</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Illinois</td> +<td class="right br padr1">6,980</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">New Hampshire</td> +<td class="right br padr1">942</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Wisconsin</td> +<td class="right">2,575</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Indiana</td> +<td class="right br padr1">4,072</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">New Jersey</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,594</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Wyoming</td> +<td class="right">459</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Indian Territory</td> +<td class="right br padr1">281</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">New Mexico</td> +<td class="right br padr1">0</td> +<td colspan="2"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Iowa</td> +<td class="right br padr1">3,937</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">New York</td> +<td class="right br padr1">5,520</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Total</td> +<td class="right bt">76,640</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">Kansas</td> +<td class="right br padr1">3,226</td> +<td class="left padl1 padr1">North Carolina</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,371</td> +<td> </td> +<td> </td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>In 1873 came the great financial crisis, with its terrible +results of interrupted production, poverty, and starvation, +and an almost total cessation of the work of building new +railroads. The largest number of miles ever built in any +one year were constructed in 1872. The greatest mileage +is in Illinois, reaching 6,589; the smallest in Rhode +Island, 136, and in Washington Territory, 110. The +State of Massachusetts has one mile of railroad to 4.86<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_378" id="Page_378">[378]</a></span> +miles of territory, this ratio being the greatest in the country. +The longest road in operation is the Chicago & Northwestern, +extending 1,500 miles; the shortest, the Little +Saw-Mill Run Road in Pennsylvania, which is but three +miles in length. The total capital of railways in the country +is $6,000,000,000, or an average of $100,000 per mile. +The earnings for the year 1872 amounted to $454,969,000, +or $7,500 per mile. The largest net earnings recorded as +made on any road were gained by the New York Central +& Hudson River, $8,260,827; the smallest on several +roads which not only earned nothing, but incurred a loss.</p> + +<p>The catastrophe of 1873-’74 revealed the fact that the +latter condition of railroad finances was vastly more common +than had been suspected; and it is still doubtful +whether the existing immense network of railroads which +covers the United States can be made, as a whole, to pay +even a moderate return on the money invested in their construction. +At the period of maximum rate of extension of +railroads in the United States—1873—the reported lengths +of the railroads of Europe and America were as follows:<a name="FNanchor_94_94" +id="FNanchor_94_94"></a><a href="#Footnote_94_94" class="fnanchor">[94]</a></p> + +<p class="center smcap">Railroads in Europe and America in 1873.</p> + +<table class="fsize80" summary="Railroads in Europe and America"> + +<tr> +<td class="center bt br">COUNTRIES.</td> +<td class="center bt br padl1 padr1">Railroads,<br />Miles.</td> +<td class="center bt br padl1 padr1">Population</td> +<td class="center bt padl1 padr1">Area,<br />Sq. Miles.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left bt br">United States</td> +<td class="right bt br padr2">71,565</td> +<td class="right bt br padr1">40,232,000</td> +<td class="right bt padr1">2,492,316</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Germany</td> +<td class="right br padr2">12,207</td> +<td class="right br padr1">40,111,265</td> +<td class="right padr1">212,091</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Austria</td> +<td class="right br padr2">5,865</td> +<td class="right br padr1">35,943,592</td> +<td class="right padr1">227,234</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">France</td> +<td class="right br padr2">10,333</td> +<td class="right br padr1">36,469,875</td> +<td class="right padr1">201,900</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Russia in Europe</td> +<td class="right br padr2">7,044</td> +<td class="right br padr1">71,207,794</td> +<td class="right padr1">1,992,574</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Great Britain, 1872</td> +<td class="right br padr2">15,814</td> +<td class="right br padr1">31,817,108</td> +<td class="right padr1">120,769</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Belgium</td> +<td class="right br padr2">1,301</td> +<td class="right br padr1">4,839,094</td> +<td class="right padr1">11,412</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Netherlands</td> +<td class="right br padr2">886</td> +<td class="right br padr1">3,858,055</td> +<td class="right padr1">13,464</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Switzerland</td> +<td class="right br padr2">820</td> +<td class="right br padr1">2,669,095</td> +<td class="right padr1">15,233</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Italy</td> +<td class="right br padr2">3,667</td> +<td class="right br padr1">26,273,776</td> +<td class="right padr1">107,961</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Denmark</td> +<td class="right br padr2">420</td> +<td class="right br padr1">1,784,741</td> +<td class="right padr1">14,453</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Spain</td> +<td class="right br padr2">3,401</td> +<td class="right br padr1">16,301,850</td> +<td class="right padr1">182,758</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br">Portugal</td> +<td class="right br padr2">453</td> +<td class="right br padr1">3,987,867</td> +<td class="right padr1">36,510</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br padr1">Sweden and Norway</td> +<td class="right br padr2">1,049</td> +<td class="right br padr1">5,860,122</td> +<td class="right padr1">188,771</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="left br bb">Greece</td> +<td class="right br bb padr2">100</td> +<td class="right br bb padr1">1,332,508</td> +<td class="right bb padr1">19,941</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_379" id="Page_379">[379]</a></span>The railroads in Great Britain comprise over 15,000 miles +of track now being worked in the United Kingdom, on which +have been expended $2,800,000,000. This sum is equal to five +times the amount of the annual value of all the real property +in Great Britain, and two-thirds of the national debt. +After deducting all the working expenses, the gross net +annual revenue of all the roads exceeds by $110,000,000 the +total revenue from all sources of Belgium, Holland, Portugal, +Denmark, Sweden and Norway. An army of 100,000 +officers and servants is in the employ of the companies, +and the value of the rolling-stock exceeds $150,000,000.</p> + + +<h4><span class="smcap">Section III.—Marine Engines.</span></h4> + +<p>The changes which have now become completed in the +marine steam-engine have been effected at a later date than +those which produced the modern locomotive. On the +American rivers the modification of the beam-engine since +the time of Robert L. Stevens has been very slight. The +same general arrangement is retained, and the details are +little, if at all, altered. The pressure of steam is sometimes +as high as 60 pounds per square inch.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig130" id="Fig130"></a> +<img src="images/illo407.png" alt="BeamEngine" width="350" height="457" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 130.</span>—Beam-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>The valves are of the disk or poppet variety, rising and +falling vertically. They are four in number, two steam +and two exhaust valves being placed at each end of the +steam-cylinder. The beam-engine is a peculiarly American +type, seldom if ever seen abroad. <a href="#Fig130">Fig. 130</a> is an outline +sketch of this engine as built for a steamer plying on the +Hudson River. This class of engine is usually adopted in +vessels of great length, light draught, and high speed. +But one steam-cylinder is commonly used. The cross-head +is coupled to one end of the beam by means of a pair of +links, and the motion of the opposite end of the beam is +transmitted to the crank by a connecting-rod of moderate +length. The beam has a cast-iron centre surrounded by a +wrought-iron strap of lozenge shape, in which are forged<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_380" id="Page_380">[380]</a></span> +the bosses for the end-centres, or for the pins to which the +connecting-rod and the links are attached. The main centre +of the beam is supported by a “gallows-frame” of timbers +so arranged as to receive all stresses longitudinally. +The crank and shaft are of wrought-iron. The valve-gear +is usually of the form already mentioned as the Stevens +valve-gear, the invention of Robert L. and Francis B. Stevens. +The condenser is placed immediately beneath the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_381" id="Page_381">[381]</a></span> +steam-cylinder. The air-pump is placed close beside it, and +worked by a rod attached to the beam. Steam-vessels on +the Hudson River have been driven by such engines at the +rate of 20 miles an hour. This form of engine is remarkable +for its smoothness of operation, its economy and durability, +its compactness, and the latitude which it permits in +the change of shape of the long, flexible vessels in which it +is generally used, without injury by “getting out of line.”</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig131" id="Fig131"></a> +<img src="images/illo408.png" alt="Oscillating Engine and Feathering Paddle Wheel" width="382" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 131.</span>—Oscillating Engine and Feathering Paddle-Wheel.</p></div> + +<p>For paddle-engines of large vessels, the favorite type, +which has been the side-lever engine, is now rarely built. For +smaller vessels, the oscillating engine with feathering paddle-wheels +is still largely employed in Europe. This style +of engine is shown in <a href="#Fig131">Fig. 131</a>. It is very compact, light, +and moderately economical, and excels in simplicity. The +usual arrangement is such that the feathering-wheel has the +same action upon the water as a radial wheel of double +diameter. This reduction of the diameter of the wheel, +while retaining maximum effectiveness, permits a high +speed of engine, and therefore less weight, volume, and +cost. The smaller wheel-boxes, by offering less resistance +to the wind, retard the progress of the vessel less than those<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_382" id="Page_382">[382]</a></span> +of radial wheels. Inclined engines are sometimes used for +driving paddle-wheels. In these the steam-cylinder lies in +an inclined position, and its connecting-rod directly connects +the crank with the cross-head. The condenser and +air-pump usually lie beneath the cross-head guides, and are +worked by a bell-crank driven by links on each side the +connecting-rod, attached to the cross-head. Such engines +are used to some extent in Europe, and they have been +adopted in the United States navy for side-wheel gunboats. +They are also used on the ferry-boats plying between New +York and Brooklyn.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig132" id="Fig132"></a> +<img src="images/illo410.png" alt="The Two Rhode Islands" width="500" height="242" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 132.</span>—The Two Rhode Islands, 1836-1876.</p></div> + +<p>Among the finest illustrations of recent practice in the +construction of side-wheel steamers are those built for the +several routes between New York and the cities of New +England which traverse Long Island Sound. Our <a href="#Fig132">illustration</a> +exhibits the form of these vessels, and also shows well +the modifications in structure and size which have been +made during this generation. The later vessel is 325 feet +long, 45 feet beam, 80 feet wide over the “guards,” and 16 +feet deep, drawing 10 feet of water. The “frames” upon +which the planking of the hull is fastened are of white-oak, +and the lighter and “top” timbers of cedar and locust. +The engine has a steam-cylinder 90 inches in diameter and +12 feet stroke of piston.<a name="FNanchor_95_95" id="FNanchor_95_95"></a><a href="#Footnote_95_95" +class="fnanchor">[95]</a> On each side the great saloons +which extend from end to end of the upper deck are state-rooms, +containing each two berths and elegantly furnished. +The engine of this vessel is capable of developing about +2,500 horse-power. The great wheels, of which the paddle-boxes +are seen rising nearly to the height of the hurricane-deck, +are 37<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter and 12 in breadth. The hull +of this vessel, including all wood-work, weighs over 1,200 +tons. The weight of the machinery is about 625 tons. +The steamer makes 16 knots an hour when the engine is at +its best speed—about 17 revolutions per minute—and its<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_383" id="Page_383">[383]</a></span> +average speed is about 14 knots on its route of 160 miles. +The coal required to supply the furnaces of such a vessel +and with such machinery would be about 3 tons per hour.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_384" id="Page_384">[384]</a></span> +or a little over 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> pounds per horse-power. The construction +of such a vessel occupies, usually, about a year, and +costs a quarter of a million dollars.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig133" id="Fig133"></a> +<img src="images/illo411.png" alt="Mississippi Steamboat" width="374" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 133.</span>—A Mississippi Steamboat.</p></div> + +<p>The non-condensing direct-acting engine is used principally +on the Western rivers, driven by steam of from 100 +to 150 pounds pressure, and exhausts its steam into the atmosphere. +It is the simplest possible form of direct-acting +engine. The valves are usually of the “poppet” variety, +and are operated by cams which act at the ends of long +levers having their fulcra on the opposite side of the valve, +the stem of which latter is attached at an intermediate +point. The engine is horizontal, and the connecting-rod +directly attached to cross-head and crank-pin without intermediate +mechanism. The paddle-wheel is used, sometimes +as a stern-wheel, as in the plan of Jonathan Hulls of one and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_385" id="Page_385">[385]</a></span> +a half century ago, sometimes as a side-wheel, as is most +usual elsewhere. One of the most noted of these steamers, +plying on the Mississippi, is shown in the preceding <a href="#Fig133">sketch</a>.</p> + +<p>One of the largest of these steamers was the Grand +Republic,<a name="FNanchor_96_96" id="FNanchor_96_96"></a><a href="#Footnote_96_96" class="fnanchor">[96]</a> +a vessel 340 feet long, 56 feet beam, and 10<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> feet +depth. The draught of water of this great craft was 3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> +feet forward and 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> aft. The two sets of compound engines, +28 and 56 inches diameter and of 10 feet stroke, drive +wheels 38<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter and 18 feet wide. The boilers +were steel. A steamer built still later on the Ohio has the +following dimensions: Length, 225 feet; breadth, 35<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet; +depth, 5 feet; cylinders, 17<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">8</span> inches in diameter, 6 feet +stroke; three boilers. The hull and cabin were built at +Jeffersonville, Ind. She has 40 large state-rooms. The +cost of the steamer was $40,000.</p> + +<p>These vessels have now opened to commerce the whole +extent of the great Mississippi basin, transporting a large +share of the products of a section of country measuring a +million and a half square miles—an area equal to many +times that of New York State, and twelve times that of +the island of Great Britain—an area exceeding that of the +whole of Europe, exclusive of Russia and Turkey, and capable, +if as thoroughly cultivated as the Netherlands, of supporting +a population of between three and four hundred +millions of people.</p> + +<p>The steam-engine and propelling apparatus of the modern +ocean-steamer have now become almost exclusively the +compound or double-cylinder engine, driving the screw. +The form and the location of the machinery in the vessel +vary with the size and character of the ship which it drives. +Very small boats are fitted with machinery of quite a different +kind from that built for large steamers, and war-vessels +have usually been supplied with engines of a design +radically different from that adopted for merchant-steamers.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig134" id="Fig134"></a> +<img src="images/illo413.png" alt="Steam-Launch" width="550" height="262" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 134.</span>—Steam-Launch, New York Steam-Power Company.</p></div> + +<p>The introduction of <i><a href="#Fig134">Steam-Launches</a></i> and small pleasure-boats<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_386" id="Page_386">[386]</a></span> +driven by steam-power is of comparatively recent +date, but their use is rapidly increasing. Those first built +were heavy, slow, and complicated; but, profiting by experience, +light and graceful boats are now built, of remarkable +swiftness, and having such improved and simplified +machinery that they require little fuel and can be easily<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_387" id="Page_387">[387]</a></span> +managed. Such boats have strong, carefully-modeled hulls, +light and strong boilers, capable of making a large amount +of dry steam with little fuel, and a light, quick-running engine, +working without shake or jar, and using steam economically.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig135" id="Fig135"></a> +<img src="images/illo414.png" alt="Launch-Engine" width="292" height="550" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 135.</span>—Launch-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>The above <a href="#Fig135">sketch</a> represents the engine built by a New +York firm for such little craft. This is the smallest size +made for the market. It has a steam-cylinder 3 inches in +diameter and a stroke of piston of 5 inches, driving a screw +26 inches in diameter and of 3 feet pitch. The maximum<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_388" id="Page_388">[388]</a></span> +power of the engine is four or five times the nominal power. +The boiler is of the form shown in the illustrations of semi-portable +engines, and has a heating-surface, in this case, +of 75 square feet. The boat itself is like that seen on page +386, and is 25 feet long, of 5 feet 8 inches beam, and draws +2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> feet of water. These little machines weigh about 150 +pounds per nominal horse-power, and the boilers about 300.</p> + +<p>Some of these little vessels have attained wonderful +speed. A British steam-yacht, the Miranda, 45<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in +length, 5<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> feet wide, and drawing 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet of water, with a +total weight of 3<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> +tons, has steamed nearly 18<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles an +hour for short runs. The boat was driven by an engine of +6 inches diameter of cylinder and 8 inches stroke of piston, +making 600 revolutions per minute, driving a two-bladed +screw 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet in diameter and of +3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">3</span> feet pitch. Its machinery +had a total weight of two tons. Another English +yacht, the Firefly, is said to have made 18.94 miles an hour. +A little French yacht, the Hirondelle, has attained a speed +of 16 knots, equal to about 18<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles, an hour. This was, +however, a much larger vessel than the preceding. One of +the most remarkable of these little steamers is a torpedo-boat +built for the United States navy. This vessel is 60 +feet long, 6 feet wide, and 5 feet deep; its screw is 38 +inches in diameter and of 5 feet pitch, two-bladed, and is +driven, by a very light engine and boiler, 400 revolutions +per minute, the boat attaining a speed of 19 to 20 miles an +hour. Another little vessel, the Vision, made nearly as +great speed, developing 20 horse-power with engine and +boiler weighing but about 400 pounds.</p> + +<p>Yachts of high speed require such weight and bulk of +engine that but little space is left for cabins, and they are +usually exceedingly uncomfortable vessels. In the Miranda +the weight of machinery is more than one-half the total +weight of the whole. An illustration of the more comfortable +and more generally liked pleasure-yacht is the Day +Dream. The length is 105 feet, and the boat draws 5<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_389" id="Page_389">[389]</a></span> +feet of water. There are two engines, having steam-cylinders +14 inches in diameter and of the same length of stroke, +direct-acting, condensing, and driving a screw, of 7 feet +diameter and of 10<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet pitch, 135 revolutions a minute, +giving the yacht a speed of 13<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> knots an hour.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig136" id="Fig136"></a> +<img src="images/illo416.png" alt="Horizontal Direct-Acting Naval Screw-Engine" width="550" height="319" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 136.</span>—Horizontal, Direct-acting Naval Screw-Engine.</p></div> + +<p>In larger vessels, as in yachts, in nearly all cases, the +ordinary screw-engine is direct-acting. Two engines are +placed side by side, with cranks on the shaft at an angle +of 90° with each other. In merchant-steamers the +steam-cylinders are usually vertical and directly over the +crank-pins, to which the cross-heads are coupled. The condenser +is placed behind the engine-frame, or, where a jet-condenser +is used, the frame itself is sometimes made hollow, +and serves as a condenser. The air-pump is worked by +a beam connected by links with the cross-head. The general +arrangement is like that shown in <a href="#Fig137">Figs. 137</a> and <a href="#Fig138">138</a>. +For naval purposes such a form is objectionable, since its +height is so great that it would be exposed to injury by +shot. In naval engineering the cylinder is placed horizontally, +as in <a href="#Fig136">Fig. 136</a>, which is a sectional view, representing +an horizontal, direct-acting naval screw-engine, with jet-condenser +and double-acting air and circulating pumps. <i>A</i> +is the steam-cylinder, <i>B</i> the piston, which is connected to +the crank-pin by the piston-rod, <i>D</i>, and connecting-rod, <i>E</i>.<span class='pagenum'><a +name="Page_390" id="Page_390">[390]</a></span> +<i>F</i> is the cross-head guide. The eccentrics, <i>G</i>, operate the +valve, which is of the “three-ported variety,” by a Stephenson +link. Reversing is effected by the hand-wheel, <i>C</i>, +which, by means of a gear, <i>m</i>, and a rack, <i>k</i>, elevates and +depresses the link, and thus reverses the valve.</p> + +<p>The trunk-engine, in which the connecting-rod is attached +directly to the piston and vibrates within a trunk or +cylinder secured to the piston, moving with it, and extending +outside the cylinder, like an immense hollow piston-rod, +is frequently used in the British navy. It has rarely +been adopted in the United States.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig137" id="Fig137"></a> +<img src="images/illo417.png" alt="Compound Marine Engine, Side Elevation" width="350" height="481" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 137.</span>—Compound Marine Engine. Side Elevation.</p></div> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig138" id="Fig138"></a> +<img src="images/illo418.png" alt="Compound Marine Engine, Front Elevation and Section" width="350" height="411" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 138.</span>—Compound Marine Engine. Front Elevation and Section.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_391" id="Page_391">[391]</a></span>In nearly all steam-vessels which have been built for +the merchant service recently, and in some naval vessels, +the compound engine has been adopted. <a href="#Fig137">Figs. 137</a> and <a href="#Fig138">138</a> +represent the usual form of this engine. Here <i>A A</i>, <i>B B</i> +are the small and the large, or the high-pressure and the +low-pressure cylinders respectively. <i>C C</i> are the valve-chests. +<i>G G</i> is the condenser, which is invariably a surface-condenser. +The condensing water is sometimes directed +around the tubes contained within the casing, <i>G G</i>, +while the steam is exhausted around them and among them,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_392" id="Page_392">[392]</a></span> +and sometimes the steam is condensed within the tubes, +while the injection-water which is sent into the condenser +to produce condensation passes around the exterior of the +tubes. In either case, the tubes are usually of small diameter, +varying from five-eighths to half an inch, and in length +from four to seven feet. The extent of heating-surface is +usually from one-half to three-fourths that of the heating-surface +of the boilers.</p> + +<p>The air and circulating pumps are placed on the lower +part of the condenser-casting, and are operated by a crank +on the main shaft at <i>N</i>; or they are sometimes placed as +in the style of engine last described, and driven by a beam +worked by the cross-head. The piston-rods, <i>T S</i>, are guided +by the cross-heads, <i>V V</i>, working in slipper-guides, and to +these cross-heads are attached the connecting-rods, <i>X X</i>, +driving the cranks, <i>M M</i>. The cranks are now usually set +at right angles; in some engines this angle is increased to +120°, or even 180°. Where it is arranged as here shown, +an intermediate reservoir, <i>P O</i>, is placed between the two +cylinders to prevent the excessive variations of pressure +that would otherwise accompany the varying relative motions +of the pistons, as the steam passes from the high-pressure +to the low-pressure cylinder. Steam from the +boilers enters the high-pressure steam-chest, <i>x</i>, and is admitted +by the steam-valve alternately above and below the +piston as usual. The exhaust steam is conducted through +the exhaust passage around into the reservoir, <i>P</i>, whence it +it is taken by the low-pressure cylinder, precisely as the +smaller cylinder drew its steam from the boiler. From the +large or low-pressure cylinder the steam is exhausted into +the condenser. The valve-gear is usually a Stephenson +link, <i>g e</i>, the position of which is determined, and the reversal +of which is accomplished, by a hand-wheel, <i>o</i>, and +screw, <i>m n p</i>, which, by the bell-crank, <i>k i</i>, are attached to +the link, <i>g e</i>. The “box-framing” forms also the hot-well. +The surface-condenser is cleared by a single-acting air-pump,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_393" id="Page_393">[393]</a></span> +inside the frame, at <i>T</i>. The feed-pump and the bilge-pumps +are driven from the cross-head of the air-pump.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port12" id="Port12"></a> +<img src="images/illo420.png" alt="Elder" width="350" height="417" /> +<p class="caption">John Elder.</p></div> + +<p>The successful introduction of the double-cylinder engine +was finally accomplished by the exertions of a few +engineers, who were at once intelligent enough to understand +its advantages, and energetic and enterprising enough +to push it forward in spite of active opposition, and powerful +enough, pecuniarily and in influence, to succeed. +The most active and earnest of these eminent men was +<a href="#Port12">John Elder</a>, of the firm of Randolph, Elder & Co., subsequently +John Elder & Co., of Glasgow.<a name="FNanchor_97_97" id="FNanchor_97_97"></a><a href="#Footnote_97_97" class="fnanchor">[97]</a></p> + +<p>Elder was of Scotch descent. His ancestors had, for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_394" id="Page_394">[394]</a></span> +generations, shown great skill and talent in construction, +and had always been known as successful millwrights. John +Elder was born at Glasgow, March 8, 1824, and died in +London, September 17, 1869. He was educated at the +Glasgow High-School and in the College of Engineering at +the University of Glasgow, where, however, his attendance +was but for a short time. He learned the trade under his +father in the workshops of the Messrs. Napier, and became +an unusually expert draughtsman. After spending three +years in charge of the drawing-office at the engine-building +works of Robert Napier, where his father had been manager, +Elder became a partner in the firm which had previously +been known as Randolph, Elliott & Co., in the year 1852. +The firm commenced building iron vessels in 1860.</p> + +<p>In the mean time, the experiments of Hornblower and +Wolff, of Allaire and Smith, and of McNaught, Craddock, +and Nicholson, together with the theoretical investigations +of Thompson, Rankine, Clausius, and others, had shown +plainly in what direction to look for improvement upon +then standard engines, and what direction practice was +taking with all types. The practical deductions which were +becoming evident were recognized very early by Elder, and +he promptly began to put in practice the principles which +his knowledge of thermo-dynamics and of mechanics enabled +him to appreciate. He adopted the compound engine, +and coupled his cranks at angles of 180°, in order to avoid +losses due to the friction of the crank-shaft in its bearings, +by effecting a partial counterbalancing of pressures on the +journals. Elder was one of the first to point out the fact that +the compound engine had proved itself more efficient than +the single-cylinder engine, only when the pressure of steam +carried and the extent to which expansion was adopted exceeded +the customary practice of his time. His own practice +was, from the first, successful, and from 1853 to 1867 he +and his partners were continually engaged in the construction +of steamers and fitting them with compound engines.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_395" id="Page_395">[395]</a></span>The engines of their first vessel, the Brandon, required +but 3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> pounds of coal per hour and per horse-power, in +1854, when the usual consumption was a third more. Five +years later, they had built engines which consumed a third +less than those of the Brandon; and thenceforward, for +many years, their engines, when of large size, exhibited +what was then thought remarkable economy, running on a +consumption of from 2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> to +2<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> pounds.</p> + +<p>In the year 1865 the British Government ordered a +competitive trial of three naval vessels, which only differed +in the form of their engines. The Arethusa was +fitted with trunk-engines of the ordinary kind; the Octavia +had three steam-cylinders, coupled to three cranks placed +at angles of 120° with each other; and the Constance was +fitted with compound engines, two sets of three cylinders +each, and each taking steam from the boiler into one cylinder, +passing it through the other two with continuous expansion, +and finally exhausting from the third into the condenser. +These vessels, during one week’s steaming at sea, +averaged, respectively, 3.64, 3.17, and 2.51 pounds of coal +per hour and per horse-power, and the Constance showed a +marked superiority in the efficiency of the mechanism of +her engines, when the losses by friction were compared.</p> + +<p>The change from the side-lever single-cylinder engine, +with jet-condenser and paddle-wheels, to the direct-acting +compound engine, with surface-condenser and screw-propellers, +has occurred within the memory and under the observation +of even young engineers, and it may be considered +that the revolution has not been completely effected. This +change in the design of engine is not as great as it at first +seemed likely to become. Builders have but slowly learned +the principles stated above in reference to expansion in one +or more cylinders, and the earlier engines were made with +a high and low pressure cylinder working on the same connecting-rod, +and each machine consisted of four steam-cylinders. +It was at last discovered that a high-pressure single-cylinder<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_396" id="Page_396">[396]</a></span> +engine exhausting into a separate larger low-pressure +engine might give good results, and the compound +engine became as simple as the type of engine which it +displaced. This independence of high and low pressure engines +is not in itself novel, for the plan of using the exhaust +of a high-pressure engine to drive a low-pressure condensing +engine was one of the earliest of known combinations.</p> + +<p>The advantage of introducing double engines at sea is +considerably greater than on land. The coal carried by a +steam-vessel is not only an item of great importance in consequence +of its first cost, but, displacing its weight or bulk +of freight which might otherwise be carried, it represents so +much non-paying cargo, and is to be charged with the full +cost of transportation in addition to first cost. The best of +steam-coal is therefore usually chosen for steamers making +long voyages, and the necessity of obtaining the most economical +engines is at once seen, and is fully appreciated by +steamship proprietors. Again, an economy of one-fourth of +a pound per horse-power per hour gives, on a large transatlantic +steamer, a saving of about 100 tons of coal for a +single voyage. To this saving of cost is to be added the +gain in wages and sustenance of the labor required to handle +that coal, and the gain by 100 tons of freight carried in +place of the coal.</p> + +<p>For many years the change which has here been outlined, +in the forms of engine and the working of steam expansively, +was retarded by the inefficiency of methods and +tools used in construction. With gradual improvement in +tools and in methods of doing work, it became possible to +control higher steam and to work it successfully; and the +change in this direction has been steadily going on up to +the present time with all types of steam-engine. At sea +this rise of pressure was for a considerable time retarded +by the serious difficulty encountered in the tendency of the +sulphate of lime to deposit in the boiler. When steam-pressure +had risen to 25 pounds per square inch, it was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_397" id="Page_397">[397]</a></span> +found that no amount of “blowing out” would prevent the +deposition of seriously large quantities of this salt, while at +the lower pressures at first carried at sea no troublesome +precipitation occurred, and the only precaution necessary +was to blow out sufficient brine to prevent the precipitation +of common salt from a supersaturated solution. The +introduction of surface-condensation was promptly attempted +as the remedy for this evil, but for many years +it was extremely doubtful whether its disadvantages were +not greater than its advantages. It was found very difficult +to keep the condensers tight, and boilers were injured +by some singular process of corrosion, evidently due to the +presence of the surface-condenser. The simple expedient +of permitting a very thin scale to form in the boiler was, +after a time, hit upon as a means of overcoming this difficulty, +and thenceforward the greatest obstacle to the general +introduction was the conservative disposition found +among those who had charge of marine machinery, which +conservatism regarded with suspicion every innovation. +Another trouble arose from the difficulty of finding men +neither too indolent nor too ignorant to take charge of the +new condenser, which, more complicated and more readily +disarranged than the old, demanded a higher class of attendants. +Once introduced, however, the surface-condenser +removed the obstacle to further elevation of steam-pressure, +and the rise from 20 to 60 pounds pressure soon occurred. +Elder and his competitors on the Clyde were the first to +take advantage of the fact when these higher pressures became +practicable.</p> + +<p>The lightness of engine and the smaller weight of boiler +secured when the simpler type of “compound” engine is +used are great advantages, and, when coupled with the +fact that by no other satisfactory device can great expansion +and consequent economy of fuel be obtained at sea, +the advantages are such as to make the adoption of this +style of engine imperative for ship-propulsion.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_398" id="Page_398">[398]</a></span>This extreme lightness in machinery has been largely, +also, the result of very careful and skillful designing, of +intelligent construction, and of care in the selection and +use of material. British builders had, until after the introduction +of these later types of vessels-of-war, been distinguished +rather by the weight of their machinery than for +nice calculation and proportioning of parts. Now the engines +of the heavy iron-clads are models of good proportions, +excellence in materials, and of workmanship, which +are well worthy of study. The weight per indicated horse-power +has been reduced from 400 or 500 pounds to less +than half that amount within the last ten years. This has +been accomplished by forcing the boilers—although thus, +to some extent, losing economy—by higher steam-pressure, +a very much higher piston-speed, reduction of friction of +parts, reduction of capacity for coal-stowage, and exceedingly +careful proportioning. The reduction of coal-bunker +capacity is largely compensated by the increase of economy +secured by superheating, by increased expansion, elevation +of piston-speed, and the introduction of surface-condensation.</p> + +<p>A good marine steam-engine of the form which was +considered standard 15 or 20 years ago, having low-pressure +boilers carrying steam at 20 or 25 pounds pressure as +a maximum, expanding twice or three times, and having a +jet-condenser, would require about 30 or 35 pounds of feed-water +per horse-power per hour; substituting surface-condensation +for that produced by the jet brought down the +weight of steam used to from 25 to 30 pounds; increasing +steam-pressure to 60 pounds, expanding from five to eight +times, and combining the special advantages of the superheater +and the compound engine with surface-condensation, +has reduced the consumption of steam to 20, or even, in +some cases, 15 pounds of steam per horse-power per hour. +Messrs. Perkins, of London, guarantee, as has already +been stated, to furnish engines capable of giving a horse-power +with a consumption of but 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> pound of coal. Mr.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_399" id="Page_399">[399]</a></span> +C. E. Emery reports the United States revenue-steamer +Hassler, designed by him, to have given an ordinary sea-going +performance which is probably fully equal to anything +yet accomplished. The Hassler is a small steamer, of +but 151 feet in length, 24<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet beam, and 10 feet draught. +The engines have steam-cylinders 18.1 and 28 inches diameter, +respectively, and of 28 inches stroke of piston, indicating +125 horse-power; with steam at 75 pounds pressure, +and at a speed of but 7 knots, the coal consumed was but +1.87 pound per horse-power per hour.</p> + +<p>The committee of the British Admiralty on designs of +ships-of-war have reported recently: “The carrying-power +of ships may certainly be to some extent increased by the +adoption of compound engines in her Majesty’s service. +Its use has recently become very general in the mercantile +marine, and the weight of evidence in favor of the large +economy of fuel thereby gained is, to our minds, overwhelming +and conclusive. We therefore beg earnestly to +recommend that the use of compound engines may be generally +adopted in ships-of-war hereafter to be constructed, +and applied, whenever it can be done with due regard to +economy and to the convenience of the service, to those +already built.”</p> + +<p>The forms of screws now employed are exceedingly +diverse, but those in common use are not numerous. In +naval vessels it is common to apply screws of two blades, +that they may be hoisted above water into a “well” when +the vessel is under sail, or set with the two blades directly +behind the stern-post, when their resistance to the forward +motion of the vessel will be comparatively small. In other +vessels, and in the greater number of full-power naval vessels, +screws of three or four blades are used.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig139" id="Fig139"> +</a><img src="images/illo427.png" alt="Screw-Propeller" width="500" height="499" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 139.</span>—Screw-Propeller.</p></div> + +<p>The usual form of screw (<a href="#Fig139">Fig. 139</a>) has blades of nearly +equal breadth from the hub to the periphery, or slightly +widening toward their extremities, as is seen in an exaggerated +degree in <a href="#Fig140">Fig. 140</a>, representing the form adopted +for<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_400" id="Page_400">[400]</a></span> +tug-boats, where large surface near the extremity is more +generally used than in vessels of high speed running free. +In the Griffith screw, which has been much used, the hub +is globular and very large. The blades are secured to the +hub by flanges, and are bolted on in such a manner that +their position may be changed slightly if desired. The +blades are shaped like the section of a pear, the wider part +being nearest the hub, and the blades tapering rapidly +toward their extremities. A usual form is intermediate +between the last, and is like that shown in <a href="#Fig141">Fig. 141</a>, the +hub being sufficiently enlarged to permit the blades to be +attached as in the Griffith screw, but more nearly cylindrical, +and the blades having nearly uniform width from end +to end.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig140" id="Fig140"></a> +<img src="images/illo428a.png" alt="Tug-Boat Screw" width="269" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 140.</span>—Tug-boat Screw.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_401" id="Page_401">[401]</a></span>The pitch of a screw is the distance which would be +traversed by the screw in one revolution were it to move +through the water without slip; i. e., it is double the distance +<i>C D</i>, <a href="#Fig140">Fig. 140</a>. <i>C D′</i> represents the helical path of +the extremity of the blade <i>B</i>, and <i>O E F H K</i> is that of +the blade <i>A</i>. The proportion of diameter to the pitch of +the screw is determined by the speed of the vessel. For +low speed the pitch may be as small as 1<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> the diameter. +For vessels of high speed the pitch is frequently double the +diameter. The diameter of the screw is made as great as +possible, since the slip decreases with the increase of the +area of screw-disk. Its length is usually about one-sixth of +the diameter. A greater length produces loss by increase +of surface causing too great friction, while a shorter screw +does not fully utilize the resisting power of the cylinder of +water within which it works, and increased slip causes +waste of power. An empirical value for the probable slip +in vessels of good shape, which is closely approximate usually, +is <i>S</i> = 4<i>M</i>∕<i>A</i>, +in which <i>S</i> is the slip per cent., and <i>M</i> and +<i>A</i> are the areas of the midship section and of the screw-disk +in square feet.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig141" id="Fig141"></a> +<img src="images/illo428b.png" alt="Hirsch Screw" width="350" height="333" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 141.</span>—Hirsch Screw.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_402" id="Page_402">[402]</a></span>The most effective screws have slightly greater pitch at +the periphery than at the hub, and an increasing pitch from +the forward to the rear part of the screw. The latter +method of increasing pitch is more generally adopted alone. +The thrust of the screw is the pressure which it exerts in +driving the vessel forward. In well-formed vessels, with +good screws, about two-thirds of the power applied to the +screw is utilized in propulsion, the remainder being wasted +in slip and other useless work. Its efficiency is in such a +case, therefore, 66 per cent. Twin screws, one on each side +of the stern-post, are sometimes used in vessels of light +draught and considerable breadth, whereby decreased slip +is secured.</p> + +<p>As has already been stated, the introduction of the compound +engine has been attempted, but with less success +than in Europe, by several American engineers.</p> + +<p>The most radical change in the methods of ship-propulsion +which has been successfully introduced in some localities +has been the adoption of a system of “wire-rope towage.” +It is only well adapted for cases in which the steamer +traverses the same line constantly, moving backward and +forward between certain points, and is never compelled to +deviate to any considerable extent from the path selected. +A similar system is in use in Canada, but it has not yet +come into use in the United States, notwithstanding the +fact that, wherever its adoption is practicable, it has a +marked superiority in economy over the usual methods of +propulsion. With chain or rope traction there is no loss by +slip or oblique action, as in both screw and paddle-wheel +propulsion. In the latter methods these losses amount to +an important fraction of the total power; they rarely, if +ever, fall below a total of 25 per cent., and probably in +towage exceed 50 per cent. The objection to the adoption +of chain-propulsion, as it is also often called, is the necessity +of following closely the line along which the chain or the +rope is laid. There is, however, much less difficulty than<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_403" id="Page_403">[403]</a></span> +would be anticipated in following a sinuous route or in +avoiding obstacles in the channel or passing other vessels. +The system is particularly well adapted for use on canals.</p> + +<p>The steam-boilers in use in the later and best marine +engineering practice are of various forms, but the standard +types are few in number. That used on river-steamers in +the United States has already been described.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig142" id="Fig142"></a> +<img src="images/illo430.png" alt="Marine Fire-Tubular Boiler, Section" width="350" height="313" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 142.</span>—Marine Fire-tubular Boiler. Section.</p></div> + +<p><a href="#Fig142">Fig. 142</a> is a type of marine tubular boiler which is in +most extensive use in sea-going steamers for moderate +pressure, and particularly for naval vessels. Here the gases +pass directly into the back connection from the fire, and +thence forward again, through horizontal tubes, to the front +connection and up the chimney. In naval vessels the steam-chimney +is omitted, as it is there necessary to keep all parts +of the boiler as far below the water-line as possible. Steam +is taken from the boiler by pipes which are carried from +end to end of the steam-space, near the top of the boiler, +the steam entering these pipes through small holes drilled +on the other side. Steam is thus taken from the boiler +“wet,” but no large quantity of water can usually be “entrained” +by the steam.</p> + +<p>A marine boiler has been quite extensively introduced<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_404" id="Page_404">[404]</a></span> +into the United States navy, in which the gases are led +from the back connection through a tube-box around and +among a set of upright water-tubes, which are filled with +water, circulation taking place freely from the water-space +immediately above the crown-sheet of the furnace up +through these tubes into the water-space above them. +These “water-tubular” boilers have a slight advantage +over the “fire-tubular” boilers already described in compactness, +in steaming capacity, and in economical efficiency. +They have a very marked advantage in the facility with +which the tubes may be scraped or freed from the deposit +when a scale of sulphate of lime or other salt has formed +within them by precipitation from the water. The fire-tubular +boiler excels in convenience of access for plugging +up leaking tubes, and is much less costly than the water-tubular. +The water-tube class of boilers still remain in +extensive use in the United States naval steamers. They +have never been much used in the merchant service, although +introduced by James Montgomery in the United +States and by Lord Dundonald in Great Britain twenty +years earlier. Opinion still remains divided among engineers +in regard to their relative value. They are gradually +reassuming prominence by their introduction in the modified +form of sectional boilers.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig143" id="Fig143"></a> +<img src="images/illo431.png" alt="Marine High-Pressure Boiler, Section" width="350" height="254" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 143.</span>—Marine High-Pressure Boiler. Section.</p></div> + +<p>Marine boilers are now usually given the form shown in +section in <a href="#Fig143">Fig. 143</a>. This form of +boiler is adopted where<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_405" id="Page_405">[405]</a></span> +steam-pressures of 60 pounds and upward are carried, as in +steam-vessels supplied with compound engines, cylindrical +forms being considered the best with high pressures. The +large cylindrical flues, therefore, form the furnaces as +shown in the transverse sectional view. The gases rise, as +shown in the longitudinal section, through the connection, +and pass back to the end of the boiler through the tubes, +and thence, instead of entering a steam-chimney, they are +conducted by a smoke-connection, not shown in the sketch, +to the smoke funnel or stack. In merchant-steamers, a +steam-drum is often mounted horizontally above the boiler. +In other cases a separator is attached to the steam-pipe +between boilers and engines. This usually consists of an +iron tank, divided by a vertical partition extending from the +top nearly to the bottom. The steam, entering the top at +one side of this partition, passes underneath it, and up to +the top on the opposite side, where it issues into a steam-pipe +leading directly to the engine. The sudden reversal +of its course at the bottom causes it to leave the suspended +water in the bottom of the separator, whence it is drained +off by pipes.</p> + +<p>The most interesting illustrations of recent practice in +marine engineering and naval architecture are found in the +steamers which are now seen on transoceanic routes for the +merchant service, and, in the naval service, in the enormous +iron-clads which have been built in Great Britain.</p> + +<p>The City of Peking is one of the finest examples of +American practice. This vessel was constructed for the +Pacific Mail Company. The hull is 423 feet long, of 48 +feet beam, and 38<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet deep. Accommodations are furnished +for 150 cabin and 1,800 steerage passengers, and the +coal-bunkers “stow” 1,500 tons of coal. The iron plates +of which the sides and bottom are made are from <span class="enum">11</span>∕<span class="denom">16</span> to one +inch in thickness. The weight of iron used in construction +was about 5,500,000 pounds. The machinery weighed nearly +2,000,000 pounds, with spare gear and accessory apparatus.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_406" id="Page_406">[406]</a></span> +The engines are compound, with two steam-cylinders of +51 inches and two of 88 inches diameter, and a stroke of +piston of 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet. The condensing water is sent through +the surface-condensers by circulating-pumps driven by their +own engines. Ten boilers furnish steam to these engines, +each having a diameter of 13 feet, a length of 13<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet, and +a thickness of “shell” of 1<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">16</span> inch. Each has three furnaces, +and contains 204 tubes of an outside diameter of 3<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> inches. +All together, they have 520 square feet of grate-surface and +17,000 square feet of heating-surface. The area of cooling-surface +in the condensers is 10,000 square feet. The City +of Rome, a ship of later design, is 590 feet long, “over all,” +52 feet beam, 52 feet deep, and measures 8,300 tons. The +engines, of 8,500 horse-power, will drive the vessel 18 knots +(21 miles) an hour; they have six steam-cylinders (three +high and three low pressure), and are supplied with steam +by 8 boilers heated by 48 furnaces. The hull is of steel, the +bottom double, and the whole divided into ten compartments +by transverse bulkheads. Two longitudinal bulkheads +in the engine and boiler compartments add greatly to the +safety of the vessel.</p> + +<p>The most successful steam-vessels in general use are these +screw-steamers of transoceanic lines. Those of the transatlantic +lines are now built from 350 to 550 feet long, generally +propelled from 12 to 18 knots (14 to 21 miles) an hour, +by engines of from 3,000 to 8,000 horse-power, consuming +from 70 to 250 tons of coal a day, and crossing the Atlantic +in from eight to ten days. These vessels are now invariably +fitted with the compound engine and surface-condensers. +One of these vessels, the Germanic, has been reported at +Sandy Hook, the entrance to New York Harbor, in 7 days 11 +hours 37 minutes from Queenstown—a distance, as measured +by the log and by observation, of 2,830 miles. Another +steamer, the Britannic, has crossed the Atlantic in 7 days 10 +hours and 53 minutes. These vessels are of 5,000 tons burden, +of 750 “nominal” horse-power (probably 5,000 actual).</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig144" id="Fig144"></a> +<img src="images/illo434.png" alt="The Modern Steamship" width="474" height="275" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 144.</span>—The Modern Steamship.</p></div> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_407" id="Page_407">[407-408]</a></span>The <a href="#Fig144">modern steamship</a> +is as wonderful an illustration of +ingenuity and skill in all interior arrangements as in size,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_408" id="Page_408"></a></span> +power, and speed. The size of sea-going steamers has become +so great that it is unsafe to intrust the raising of the anchor +or the steering of the vessel to manual power and skill; and +these operations, as well as the loading and unloading of the +vessel, are now the work of the same great motor—steam.</p> + +<p>The now common form of auxiliary engine for controlling +the helm is one of the inventions of the American engineer +F. E. Sickels, who devised the “Sickels cut-off,” and +was first invented about 1850. It was exhibited at London +at the International Exhibition of 1851. It consists<a name="FNanchor_98_98" id="FNanchor_98_98"></a><a +href="#Footnote_98_98" class="fnanchor">[98]</a> principally +of two cylinders working at right angles upon a shaft +geared into a large wheel fastened by a friction-plate lined +with wood, and set by a screw to any desired pressure on +the steering-apparatus. The wheel turned by the steersman +is connected with the valve-gear of the cylinders, so +that the steam, or other motor, will move the rudder precisely +as the helmsman moves the wheel adjusting the +steam-valves. This wheel thus becomes the steering-wheel. +The apparatus is usually so arranged that it may be connected +or disconnected in an instant, and hand-steering +adopted if the smoothness of the sea and the low speed of +the vessel make it desirable or convenient. This method +was first adopted in the United States on the steamship +Augusta.</p> + +<p>The same inventor and others have contrived “steam-windlasses,” +some of which are in general use on large vessels. +The machinery of these vessels is also often fitted +with a steam “reversing-gear,” by means of which the engines +are as easily manœuvred as are those of the smallest +vessels, to which hand-gear is always fitted. In one of these +little auxiliary engines, as devised by the author, a small +handle being adjusted to a marked position, as to the point +marked “stop” on an index-plate, the auxiliary engine at +once starts, throws the valve-gear into the proper position—as,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_409" id="Page_409">[409]</a></span> +if a link-motion, into “middle-gear”—thus stopping the +large engines, and then it itself stops. Setting the handle +so that its pointer shall point to “ahead,” the little engine +starts again, sets the link in position to go ahead, thus +starting the large engines, and again stops itself. If set at +“back,” the same series of operations occurs, leaving the +main engines backing and the little “reversing engine” +stopped. A number of forms of reversing engine are in +use, each adapted to some one type of engine.</p> + +<p>The hull of the transatlantic steamer is now always of +iron, and is divided into a number of “compartments,” each +of which is water-tight and separated from the adjacent +compartments by iron “bulkheads,” in which are fitted +doors which, when closed, are also water-tight. In some +cases these doors close automatically when the water rises +in the vessel, thus confining it to the leaking portion.</p> + +<p>Thus we have already seen a change in transoceanic +lines from steamers like the Great Western (1837), 212 feet +in length, of 35<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet beam, and 23 feet depth, driven by +engines of 450 horse-power, and requiring 15 days to cross +the Atlantic, to steamships over 550 feet long, 55 feet beam, +and 55 feet deep, with engines of 10,000 horse-power, crossing +the Atlantic in 7 days; iron substituted for wood in +construction, the cost of fuel reduced one-half, and the +speed raised from 8 to 18 knots and over. In the earlier +days of steamships they were given a proportion of length +to breadth of from 5 to 6 to 1; in forty years the proportion +increased until 11 to 1 was reached.</p> + +<p>The whole naval establishment of every country has +been greatly modified by the recent changes in methods of +attack and defense; but the several classes of ships which +still form the naval marine are all as dependent upon their +steam-machinery as ever.</p> + +<table style="width: 500px;" summary="Fig. 145"> + +<tr> +<td colspan="4" class="figcenter"><a name="Fig145" id="Fig145"></a> +<img src="images/illo437.png" alt="Modern Iron-Clads" width="474" height="275" /></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="center fsize80">H. B. M. Iron-Clad Captain.</td> +<td class="center fsize80">H. B. M. Iron-Clad Thunderer.</td> +<td class="center fsize80">U. S. Iron-Clad Dictator.</td> +<td class="center fsize80">U. S. Iron-Clad Monitor.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="4" style="line-height: .5em;"> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="center fsize80">H. B. M. Iron-Clad Giatton.</td> +<td colspan="2" class="center fsize80">French Iron-Clad Dunderberg.</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 145.</span>—Modern Iron-Clads.</p> + +<p>It is only recently that the attempt seems to have been +made to determine a classification of war-vessels and to +plan a naval establishment which shall be likely to meet<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_410" id="Page_410">[410]</a></span> +fully the requirements of the immediate future. It has +hitherto been customary simply to make each ship a little +stronger, faster, or more powerful to resist or to make<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_411" id="Page_411">[411]</a></span> +attack than was the last. The fact that the direction of +progress in naval science and architecture is plainly perceivable, +and that upon its study may be based a fair estimate +of the character and relative distribution of several classes +of vessels, seems to have been appreciated by very few.</p> + +<p>In the year 1870 the writer proposed<a name="FNanchor_99_99" id="FNanchor_99_99"></a><a +href="#Footnote_99_99" class="fnanchor">[99]</a> a classification of +vessels other than torpedo-vessels, which has since been also +proposed in a somewhat modified form by Mr. J. Scott +Russell.<a name="FNanchor_100_100" id="FNanchor_100_100"></a><a href="#Footnote_100_100" class="fnanchor">[100]</a> +The author then remarked that the increase so +rapidly occurring in weight of ordnance and of armor, and +in speed of war-vessels, would probably soon compel a division +of the vessels of every navy into three classes of +ships, exclusive of torpedo-vessels, one for general service +in time of peace, the others for use only in time of war.</p> + +<p>“The first class may consist of unarmored vessels of +moderate size, fair speed under steam, armed with a few +tolerably heavy guns, and carrying full sail-power.</p> + +<p>“The second class may be vessels of great speed under +steam, unarmored, carrying light batteries and as great +spread of canvas as can readily be given them; very much +such vessels as the Wampanoag class of our own navy were +intended to be—calculated expressly to destroy the commerce +of an enemy.</p> + +<p>“The third class may consist of ships carrying the +heaviest possible armor and armament, with strongly-built +bows, the most powerful machinery that can be given them, +of large coal-carrying capacity, and unencumbered by sails, +everything being made secondary to the one object of obtaining +victory in contending with the most powerful of +possible opponents. Such vessels could never go to sea +singly, but would cruise in couples or in squadrons. It +seems hardly doubtful that attempts to combine the qualities +of all classes in a single vessel, as has hitherto been<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_412" id="Page_412">[412]</a></span> +done, will be necessarily given up, although the classification +indicated will certainly tend largely to restrict naval +operations.”</p> + +<p>The introduction of the stationary, the floating, and the +automatic classes of torpedoes, and of torpedo-vessels, has +now become accomplished, and this element, which it was +predicted by Bushnell and by Fulton three-quarters of a +century ago would at some future time become important +in warfare, is now well recognized by all nations. How far +it may modify future naval establishments cannot be yet +confidently stated, but it seems sufficiently evident that the +attack, by any navy, of stationary defenses protected by +torpedoes is now quite a thing of the past. It may be perhaps +looked upon as exceedingly probable that torpedo-ships +of very high speed will yet drive all heavily-armored +vessels from the ocean, thus completing the historic parallel +between the man-in-armor of the middle ages and the armored +man-of-war of our own time.<a name="FNanchor_101_101" id="FNanchor_101_101"></a><a href="#Footnote_101_101" class="fnanchor">[101]</a></p> + +<p>Of these classes, the third is of most interest, as exhibiting +most perfectly the importance and variety of the work +which the steam-engine is made to perform. On the later +of these vessels, the anchor is raised by a steam anchor-hoisting +apparatus; the heavier spars and sails are handled +by the aid of a steam-windlass; the helm is controlled by a +steering-engine, and the helmsman, with his little finger, +sets in motion a steam-engine, which adjusts the rudder +with a power which is unimpeded by wind or sea, and with +an exactness that could not be exceeded by the hand-steering +gear of a yacht; the guns are loaded by steam, are elevated +or depressed, and are given lateral training, by the +same power; the turrets in which the guns are incased are +turned, and the guns are whirled toward every point of the +compass, in less time than is required to sponge and reload<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_413" id="Page_413">[413]</a></span> +them; and the ship itself is driven through the water by +the power of ten thousand horses, at a speed which is only +excelled on land by that of the railroad-train.</p> + +<p>The British Minotaur was one of the earlier iron-clads. +The great length and consequent difficulty of manœuvring, +the defect of speed, and the weakness of armor of these +vessels have led to the substitution of far more effective +designs in later constructions. The Minotaur is a four-masted +screw iron-clad, 400 feet long, of 59 feet beam and +26<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet draught of water. +Her speed at sea is about 12<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> +knots, and her engines develop, as a maximum, nearly 6,000 +indicated horse-power. Her heaviest armor-plates are but +6 inches in thickness. Her extreme length and her unbalanced +rudder make it difficult to turn rapidly. With <i>eighteen +men at the steering-wheel</i> and sixty others on the tackle, +the ship, on one occasion, was 7<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> minutes in turning completely +around. These long iron-clads were succeeded by +the shorter vessels designed by Mr. E. J. Reed, of which +the first, the Bellerophon, was of 4,246 tons burden, 300 +feet long by 56 feet beam, and 24<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet draught, of the 14-knot +speed, with 4,600 horse-power; and having the “balanced +rudder” used many years earlier in the United States +by Robert L. Stevens,<a name="FNanchor_102_102" id="FNanchor_102_102"></a><a +href="#Footnote_102_102" class="fnanchor">[102]</a> it can turn in four minutes with +eight men at the wheel. The cost of construction was some +$600,000 less than that of the Minotaur. A still later vessel, +the Monarch, was constructed on a system quite similar +to that known in the United States as the Monitor type, or +as a turreted iron-clad. This vessel is 330 feet long, 57<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> +feet wide, and 36 feet deep, drawing 24<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet of water. +The total weight of ship and contents is over 8,000 tons, +and the engines are of over 8,500 horse-power. The armor +is 6 and 7 inches thick on the hull, and 8 inches on the two +turrets, over a heavy teak backing. The turrets contain +each two 12-inch rifled guns, weighing 25 tons each, and,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_414" id="Page_414">[414]</a></span> +with a charge of 70 pounds of powder, throwing a shot of +600 pounds weight with a velocity of 1,200 feet per second, +and giving it a <i>vis viva</i> equivalent to the raising of +over 6,100 tons one foot high, and equal to the work of penetrating +an iron plate 13<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> inches thick. This immense vessel +is driven by a pair of “single-cylinder” engines having +steam-cylinders <i>ten feet</i> in diameter and of 4<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet stroke +of piston, driving a two-bladed Griffith screw of 23<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet +diameter and 26<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> feet pitch, 65 revolutions, at the maximum +speed of 14.9 knots, or about 17<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> miles, an hour. +To drive these powerful engines, boilers having an aggregate +of about 25,000 square feet (or more than a half-acre) +of heating-surface are required, with 900 square feet +of grate-surface. The refrigerating surface in the condensers +has an area of 16,500 square feet—over one-third of an +acre. The cost of these engines and boilers was £66,500.</p> + +<p>Were all this vast steam-power developed, giving the +vessel a speed of 15 knots, the ship, if used as a “ram,” +would strike an enemy at rest with the tremendous “energy” +of 48,000 foot-tons—equal to the shock of the projectiles +of eight or nine such guns as are carried by the iron-clad +itself, simultaneously discharged upon one spot.</p> + +<p>But even this great vessel is less formidable than later +vessels. One of the latter, the Inflexible, is a shorter but +wider and deeper ship than the Monarch, measuring 320 +feet long, 75 feet beam, and 25 draught, displacing over +10,000 tons. The great rifles carried by this vessel weigh +81 tons each, throwing shot weighing a half-ton from behind +iron-plating two feet in thickness. The steam-engines +are of about the same power as those of the Monarch, +and give this enormous hull a speed of 14 knots an hour.</p> + +<p>The navy of the United States does not to-day possess +iron-clads of power even approximating that of either of +several classes of British and other foreign naval vessels.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig146" id="Fig146"></a> +<img src="images/illo442.png" alt="The Great Eastern" width="556" height="350" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 146.</span>—The Great Eastern.</p></div> + +<p>The largest vessel of any class yet constructed is the +Great Eastern (<a href="#Fig146">Fig. 146</a>), begun in 1854 and completed +in<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_415" id="Page_415">[415]</a></span> +1859, by J. Scott Russell, on the Thames, England. This ship +is 680 feet long, 83 feet wide, 58 feet deep, 28 feet draught, +and of 24,000 tons measurement. There are four paddle and +four screw engines, the former having steam-cylinders 74 +inches in diameter, with 14 feet stroke, the latter 84 inches in +diameter and 4 feet stroke. They are collectively of 10,000 +actual horse-power. The paddle-wheels are 56 feet in diameter, +the screw 24 feet. The steam-boilers supplying the +paddle-engines have 44,000 square feet (more than an acre) +of heating-surface. The boilers supplying the screw-engines +are still larger. At 30 feet draught, this great vessel +displaces 27,000 tons. The engines were designed to develop +10,000 horse-power, driving the ship at the rate of +16<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> statute miles an hour.</p> + +<p>The figures quoted in the descriptions of these great +steamships do not enable the non-professional reader to form +a conception of the wonderful power which is concentrated +within so small a space as is occupied by their steam-machinery. +The “horse-power” of the engines is that determined<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_416" id="Page_416">[416]</a></span> +by James Watt as the maximum obtainable for eight +hours a day from the strongest London draught-horses. +The ordinary average draught-horse would hardly be able +to exert two-thirds as much during the eight hours’ steady +work of a working-day. The working-day of the steam-engine, +on the other hand, is twenty-four hours in length.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Fig147" id="Fig147"></a> +<img src="images/illo443.png" alt="The Great Eastern At Sea" width="400" height="316" /> +<p class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 147.</span>—The Great Eastern at Sea.</p></div> + +<p>The work of the 10,000 horse-power engines of the +Great Eastern could be barely equaled by the efforts of +15,000 horses; but to continue their work uninterruptedly, +day in and day out, for weeks together, as when done by +steam, would require at least three relays, or 45,000 horses. +Such a stud would weigh 25,000 tons, and if harnessed +“tandem” would extend thirty miles. It is only by such a +comparison that the mind can begin to comprehend the +utter impossibility of accomplishing by means of animal<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_417" id="Page_417">[417]</a></span> +power the work now done for the world by steam. The +cost of the greater power is but about one-tenth that of +horse-power, and by its means tasks are accomplished with +ease which are absolutely impossible of accomplishment by +animal power.</p> + +<p>It is estimated that the total steam-power of the world +is about 15,000,000 horse-power, and that, were horses actually +employed to do the work which these engines would +be capable of doing were they kept constantly in operation, +the number required would exceed 60,000,000.</p> + +<p>Thus, from the small beginnings of the Comte d’Auxiron +and the Marquis de Jouffroy in France, of Symmington +in Great Britain, and of Henry, Rumsey, and Fitch, and of +Fulton and Stevens, in the United States, steam-navigation +has grown into a great and inestimable aid and blessing to +mankind.</p> + +<p>We to-day cross the ocean with less risk, and transport +ourselves and our goods at as little cost in either time +or money as, at the beginning of the century, our parents +experienced in traveling one-tenth the distance.</p> + +<p>It is largely in consequence of this ingenious application +of a power that reminds one of the fabled genii of Eastern +romance, that the mechanic and the laborer of to-day enjoy +comforts and luxuries that were denied to wealth, and to +royalty itself, a century ago.</p> + +<p>The magnitude of our modern steamships excites the +wonder and admiration of even the people of our own time; +and there is certainly no creation of art that can be grander +in appearance than a transatlantic steamer a hundred and +fifty yards in length, and weighing, with her stores, five or +six thousand tons, as she starts on her voyage, moved by +engines equal in power to the united strength of thousands +of horses; none can more fully awaken a feeling of awe +than an immense structure like the great modern iron-clads +(<a href="#Fig145">Fig. 145</a>), vessels having a total weight of 8,000 to 10,000 +tons, and propelled by steam-engines of as many horse-power,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_418" id="Page_418">[418]</a></span> +carrying guns whose shot penetrate solid iron 20 +inches thick, and having a power of impact, when steaming +at moderate speed, sufficient to raise 35,000 tons a foot high.</p> + +<p>Far more huge than the Monarch among the iron-clads +even is that prematurely-built monster, the Great Eastern +(<a href="#Fig147">Fig. 147</a>), already described, an eighth of a mile long, and +with steam doing the work of a stud of 45,000 horses.</p> + +<p><a name="Darwin" id="Darwin"></a>Thus we are to-day witnessing the literal fulfillment of +the predictions of Oliver Evans and of John Stevens, and +almost that contained in the couplets written by the poet +Darwin, who, more than a century ago, before even the +earliest of Watt’s improvements had become generally +known, sang:</p> + +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i0">“Soon shall thy arm, unconquered Steam, afar<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Drag the slow barge, or drive the rapid car;<br /></span> +<span class="i2">Or, on wide-waving wings expanded, bear<br /></span> +<span class="i2">The flying chariot through the fields of air.”<br /></span> +</div></div> + +<p> </p> +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_85_85" id="Footnote_85_85"></a><a href="#FNanchor_85_85"><span class="label">[85]</span></a> The invention of Messrs. Charles T. Porter and John F. Allen.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_86_86" id="Footnote_86_86"></a><a href="#FNanchor_86_86"><span class="label">[86]</span></a> Invented by Mr. John F. Allen.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_87_87" id="Footnote_87_87"></a><a href="#FNanchor_87_87"><span class="label">[87]</span></a> Or not far from 600 times the cube root of the length of stroke, measured +in feet.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_88_88" id="Footnote_88_88"></a><a href="#FNanchor_88_88"><span class="label">[88]</span></a> Perkins was a native of Newburyport, Mass. He was born July 9, +1766, and died in London, July 30, 1849. He went to England when fifty-two +years of age, to introduce his inventions.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_89_89" id="Footnote_89_89"></a><a href="#FNanchor_89_89"><span class="label">[89]</span></a> It was when writing of this engine that Stuart wrote, in 1824: “Judging +from the rapid strides the steam-engine has made <i>during the last forty +years</i> to become a universal first-mover, and from the experience that has +arisen from that extension, we feel convinced that every invention which +diminishes its size without impairing its power brings it a step nearer to the +assistance of the ‘world’s great laborers,’ the husbandman and the peasant, +for whom, as yet, it performs but little. At present, it is made occasionally +to tread out the corn. What honors await not that man who may +yet direct its mighty power to plough, to sow, to harrow, and to reap!” The +progress of the steam-engine during those forty years does not to-day appear +so astounding. The sentiment here expressed has lost none of its +truth, nevertheless.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_90_90" id="Footnote_90_90"></a><a href="#FNanchor_90_90"><span class="label">[90]</span></a> Galloway and Hebert, on the Steam-Engine. London, 1836.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_91_91" id="Footnote_91_91"></a><a href="#FNanchor_91_91"><span class="label">[91]</span></a> “The High-Pressure Steam-Engine,” etc. By Dr. Ernst +Alban. Translated by William Pole, F. R. A. S. London, 1847.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_92_92" id="Footnote_92_92"></a><a href="#FNanchor_92_92"><span class="label">[92]</span></a> Invented by Joseph Maudsley, of London, 1827.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_93_93" id="Footnote_93_93"></a><a href="#FNanchor_93_93"><span class="label">[93]</span></a> January, 1884, over 120,000 miles.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_94_94" id="Footnote_94_94"></a><a href="#FNanchor_94_94"><span class="label">[94]</span></a> <i>Railroad Gazette.</i></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_95_95" id="Footnote_95_95"></a><a href="#FNanchor_95_95"><span class="label">[95]</span></a> The steam-cylinders of the engines of steamers Bristol and Providence +are 110 inches in diameter and of 12 feet stroke.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_96_96" id="Footnote_96_96"></a><a href="#FNanchor_96_96"><span class="label">[96]</span></a> Burned in 1877.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_97_97" id="Footnote_97_97"></a><a href="#FNanchor_97_97"><span class="label">[97]</span></a> <i>Vide</i> “Memoir of John Elder,” W. J. M. Rankine, Glasgow, 1871.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_98_98" id="Footnote_98_98"></a><a href="#FNanchor_98_98"><span class="label">[98]</span></a> “Official Catalogue,” 1862, vol. iv., Class viii., p. 123.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_99_99" id="Footnote_99_99"></a><a href="#FNanchor_99_99"><span class="label">[99]</span></a> <i>Journal Franklin Institute</i>, 1870. H. B. M. S. Monarch.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_100_100" id="Footnote_100_100"></a><a href="#FNanchor_100_100"><span class="label">[100]</span></a> London <i>Engineering</i>, 1875.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_101_101" id="Footnote_101_101"></a><a href="#FNanchor_101_101"><span class="label">[101]</span></a> <i>Vide</i> “Report on Machinery and Manufactures, etc., at Vienna,” by +the author, Washington, 1875.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_102_102" id="Footnote_102_102"></a><a href="#FNanchor_102_102"><span class="label">[102]</span></a> Still in use on the Hoboken ferry-boats.</p></div> + +<hr class="l05" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/illo445.png" alt="Ornament" width="200" height="249" /></div> + + +<hr class="c40" /> +<p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_419" id="Page_419">[419]</a></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VII" id="CHAPTER_VII"></a>CHAPTER VII.</h2> + +<h3><i>THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE STEAM-ENGINE.</i></h3> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<h4><span class="smcap">The History of its Growth; Energetics and Thermo-dynamics.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Of all the features which characterize this progressive economical +movement of civilized nations, that which first excites attention, through +its intimate connection with the phenomena of production, is the perpetual +and, so far as human foresight can extend, the unlimited growth of man’s +power over Nature. Our knowledge of the properties and laws of physical +objects shows no sign of approaching its ultimate boundaries; it is advancing +more rapidly, and in a greater number of directions at once, than in any +previous age or generation, and affording such frequent glimpses of unexplored +fields beyond as to justify the belief that our acquaintance with +Nature is still almost in its infancy.”—<span class="smcap">Mill.</span></p></div> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>The growth of the philosophy of the steam-engine presents +as interesting a study as that of the successive changes +which have occurred in its mechanism.</p> + +<p>In the operation of the steam-engine we find illustrated +many of the most important principles and facts which constitute +the physical sciences. The steam-engine is an exceedingly +ingenious, but, unfortunately, still very imperfect, +machine for transforming the heat-energy obtained by the +chemical combination of a combustible with the supporter +of combustion into mechanical energy. But the original +source of all this energy is found far back of its first appearance +in the steam-boiler. It had its origin at the beginning, +when all Nature came into existence. After the solar +system had been formed from the nebulous chaos of creation, +the glowing mass which is now called the sun was the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_420" id="Page_420">[420]</a></span> +depository of a vast store of heat-energy, which was thence +radiated into space and showered upon the attendant worlds +in inconceivable quantity and with unmeasured intensity. +During the past life of the globe, the heat-energy received +from the sun upon the earth’s surface was partly expended +in the production of great forests, and the storage, in the +trunks, branches, and leaves of the trees of which they were +composed, of an immense quantity of carbon, which had +previously existed in the atmosphere, combined with oxygen, +as carbonic acid. The great geological changes which +buried these forests under superincumbent strata of rock +and earth resulted in the formation of coal-beds, and the +storage, during many succeeding ages, of a vast amount of +carbon, of which the affinity for oxygen remained unsatisfied +until finally uncovered by the hand of man. Thus we +owe to the heat and light of the sun, as was pointed out by +George Stephenson, the incalculable store of potential energy +upon which the human race is so dependent for life +and all its necessaries, comforts, and luxuries.</p> + +<p>This coal, thrown upon the grate in the steam-boiler, +takes fire, and, uniting again with the oxygen, sets free +heat in precisely the same quantity that it was received +from the sun and appropriated during the growth of the +tree. The actual energy thus rendered available is transferred, +by conduction and radiation, to the water in the +steam-boiler, converts it into steam, and its mechanical +effect is seen in the expansion of the liquid into vapor +against the superincumbent pressure. Transferred from +the boiler to the engine, the steam is there permitted to +expand, doing work, and the heat-energy with which it is +charged becomes partly converted into mechanical energy, +and is applied to useful work in the mill or to driving the +locomotive or the steamboat.</p> + +<p>Thus we may trace the store of energy received from +the sun and contained in our coal through its several changes +until it is finally set at work; and we might go still further<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_421" id="Page_421">[421]</a></span> +and observe how, in each case, it is again usually re-transformed +and again set free as heat-energy.</p> + +<p>The transformation which takes place in the furnace is +a chemical change; the transfer of heat to the water and +the subsequent phenomena accompanying its passage +through the engine are physical changes, some of which +require for their investigation abstruse mathematical operations. +A thorough comprehension of the principles governing +the operation of the steam-engine, therefore, can only +be attained after studying the phenomena of physical +science with sufficient minuteness and accuracy to be able +to express with precision the laws of which those sciences +are constituted. The study of the philosophy of the steam-engine +involves the study of chemistry and physics, and of +the new science of energetics, of which the now well-grown +science of thermo-dynamics is a branch. This sketch of the +growth of the steam-engine may, therefore, be very properly +concluded by an outline of the growth of the several +sciences which together make up its philosophy, and +especially of the science of thermo-dynamics, which is peculiarly +the science of the steam-engine and of the other +heat-engines.</p> + +<p>These sciences, like the steam-engine itself, have an origin +which antedates the commencement of the Christian +era; but they grew with an almost imperceptible growth +for many centuries, and finally, only a century ago, started +onward suddenly and rapidly, and their progress has never +since been checked. They are now fully-developed and +well-established systems of natural philosophy. Yet, like +that of the steam-engine and of its companion heat-engines, +their growth has by no means ceased; and, while the student +of science cannot do more than indicate the direction +of their progress, he can readily believe that the beginning +of the end is not yet reached in their movement toward +completeness, either in the determination of facts or in the +codification of their laws.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_422" id="Page_422">[422]</a></span>When Hero lived at Alexandria, the great “Museum” +was a most important centre, about which gathered the +teachers of all then known philosophies and of all the then +recognized but unformed sciences, as well as of all those +technical branches of study which had already been so far +developed as to be capable of being systematically taught. +Astronomical observations had been made regularly and +uninterruptedly by the Chaldean astrologers for two thousand +years, and records extending back many centuries had +been secured at Babylon by Calisthenes and given to Aristotle, +the father of our modern scientific method. Ptolemy +had found ready to his hand the records of Chaldean observers +of eclipses extending back nearly 650 years, and +marvelously accurate.<a name="FNanchor_103_103" id="FNanchor_103_103"></a><a href="#Footnote_103_103" class="fnanchor">[103]</a></p> + +<p>A rude method of printing with an engraved roller on +plastic clay, afterward baked, thus making up ceramic libraries, +was practised long previous to this time; and in +the alcoves in which Hero worked were many of these +books of clay.</p> + +<p>This great Library and Museum of Alexandria was +founded three centuries before the birth of Christ, by Ptolemy +Soter, who established as his capital that great Egyptian +city when the death of his brother, the youthful but +famous conqueror whose name he gave it, placed him upon +the throne of the colossal successor of the then fallen +Persian Empire. The city itself, embellished with every +ornament and provided with every luxury that the wealth +of a conquered world or the skill, taste, and ingenuity of +the Greek painters, sculptors, architects, and engineers +could provide, was full of wonders; it was a wonder in itself. +This rich, populous, and magnificent city was the +metropolis of the then civilized world. Trade, commerce, +manufactures, and the fine arts were all represented in this<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_423" id="Page_423">[423]</a></span> +splendid exchange, and learning found its most acceptable +home and noblest field within the walls of Ptolemy’s Museum; +its disciples found themselves welcomed and protected +by its founder and his successors, Philadelphus and +the later Ptolemies.</p> + +<p>The Alexandrian Museum was founded with the declared +object of collecting all written works of authority, +of promoting the study of literature and art, and of stimulating +and assisting experimental and mathematical scientific +investigation and research. The founders of modern +libraries, colleges, and technical schools have their prototype +in intelligence, public spirit, and liberality, in the first +of the Ptolemies, who not only spent an immense sum in +establishing this great institution, but spared no expense +in sustaining it. Agents were sent out into all parts of +the world, purchasing books. A large staff of scribes was +maintained at the museum, whose duty it was to multiply +copies of valuable works, and to copy for the library +such works as could not be purchased.</p> + +<p>The faculty of the museum was as carefully organized +as was the plan of its administration. The four principal +faculties of astronomy, literature, mathematics, and medicine +were subdivided into sections devoted to the several +branches of each department. The collections of the museum +were as complete as the teachers of the undeveloped +sciences of the time could make them. Lectures were given +in all branches of study, and the number of students was +sometimes as great as twelve or thirteen thousand. The +number of books which were collected here, when the barbarian +leaders of the Roman troops under Cæsar burned +the greater part of it, was stated to be 700,000. Of these, +400,000 were within the museum itself, and were all destroyed; +the rest were in the temple of Serapis, and, for +the time, escaped destruction.</p> + +<p>The greatest of all the great men who lived at Alexandria +at the time of the establishment of the museum was<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_424" id="Page_424">[424]</a></span> +Aristotle, the teacher of Alexander and the friend of Ptolemy. +It is to Aristotle that we owe the systematization of +the philosophical ideas of Plato and the creation of the +inductive method, in which has originated all modern science. +It is to the learned men of Alexandria that we are +indebted for so effective an application of the Aristotelian +philosophy that all the then known sciences were given +form, and were so thoroughly established that the work of +modern science has been purely one of development.</p> + +<p>The inductive method, which built up all the older +sciences, and which has created all those of recent development, +consists, first, in the discovery and quantitative +determination of facts; secondly, when a sufficient number +of facts have been thus observed and defined, in the grouping +of those facts, and the detection, by a study of their +mutual relations, of the natural laws which give rise to or +regulate them. This simple method is that—and the only—method +by which science advances. By this method, and +by it only, do we acquire connected and systematic knowledge +of all the phenomena of Nature of which the physical +sciences are cognizant. It is only by the application of this +Aristotelian method and philosophy that we can hope to +acquire exact scientific knowledge of existing phenomena, +or to become able to anticipate the phenomena which are +to distinguish the future. The Aristotelian method of observing +facts, and of inductive reasoning with those facts +as a basis, has taught the chemist the properties of the +known elementary substances and their characteristic behavior +under ascertained conditions, and has taught him +the laws of combination and the effects of their union, enabling +him to predict the changes and the phenomena, +chemical and physical, which inevitably follow their contact +under any specified set of conditions.</p> + +<p>It is this process which has enabled the physicist to ascertain +the methods of molecular motion which give us +light, heat, or electricity, and the range of action and the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_425" id="Page_425">[425]</a></span> +laws which govern the transfer of energy from one of these +modes of motion to another. It was this method of study +which enabled James Watt to detect and to remedy the +defects of the Newcomen engine, and it is by the Aristotelian +philosophy that the engineer of to-day is taught to construct +the modern steamship, and to predict, before the keel +is laid or a blow struck in the workshop or the ship-yard, +what will be the weight of the vessel, its cargo-carrying +capacity, the necessary size and power of its engines, the +quantity of coal which they will require per day while +crossing the ocean, the depth at which the great hull will +float in the water, and the exact speed that the vessel will +attain when the engines are exerting their thousand or their +ten thousand horse-power.</p> + +<p>It was at Alexandria that this mighty philosophy was +first given a field in which to work effectively. Here Ptolemy +studied astronomy and “natural philosophy;” Archimedes +applied himself to the studies which attract the +mathematician and engineer; Euclid taught his royal pupil +those elements of geometry which have remained standard +twenty-two centuries; Eratosthenes and Hipparchus studied +and taught astronomy, and inaugurated the existing system +of quantitative investigation, proving the spherical form of +the earth; and Ctesibius and Hero studied pneumatics and +experimented with the germs of the steam-engine and of +less important machines.</p> + +<p>When, seven centuries later, the destruction of this +splendid institution was signalized by the death of that +brilliant scholar and heathen teacher of philosophy, Hypatia, +at the hands of the more heathenish fanatics who tore +her in pieces at the foot of the cross, and by the dispersion +of the library left by Cæsar’s soldiers in the Serapeum, a true +philosophy had been created, and the inductive method was +destined to live and to overcome every obstacle in the path +of enlightenment and civilization. The fall of the Alexandrian +Museum, sad as was the event, could not destroy the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_426" id="Page_426">[426]</a></span> +new philosophical method. Its fruits ripened slowly but +surely, and we are to-day gathering a plentiful harvest.</p> + +<p>Science, literature, and the arts, all remained dormant +for several centuries after the catastrophe which deprived +them of the light in which they had flourished so many +centuries. The armies of the caliphs made complete the +shameful work of destruction begun by the armies of Cæsar, +and the Alexandrian Library, partly destroyed by the +Romans, was completely dispersed by the Patriarchs and +their ignorant and fanatical followers; and finally all the +scattered remnants were burned by the Saracens. But +when the thirst for conquest had become satiated or appeased, +the followers of the caliphs turned their attention +to intellectual pursuits, and the ninth century of the Christian +era saw once more such a collection of philosophical +writings, collected at Bagdad, as could only be gathered by +the power and wealth of the later conquerors of the world. +Philosophy once again resumed its empire, and another race +commenced the study of the mathematics of India and of +Greece, the astronomy of Chaldea, and of all the sciences +which originated in Greece and in Egypt. By the conquest +of Spain by the Saracens, the new civilization was imported +into Western Europe and libraries were gathered together +under the Moorish rulers, one of which numbered more +than a half-million volumes. Wherever Saracen armies +had extended Mohammedan rule, schools and colleges, libraries +and collections of philosophical apparatus, were +scattered in strange profusion; and students, teachers, philosophers, +of all—the speculative as well as the Aristotelian—schools, +gathered together at these intellectual +ganglia, as enthusiastic in their work as were their Alexandrian +predecessors. The endowment of colleges, that +truest gauge of the intelligence of the wealthy classes of +any community, became as common—perhaps more so—as +at the present time, and provision was made for the education +of rich and poor alike. The mathematical sciences,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_427" id="Page_427">[427]</a></span> +and the wonderful and beautiful phenomena which—but a +thousand years later—were afterward grouped into a science +and called chemistry, were especially attractive to the Arabian +scholars, and technical applications of discovered facts +and laws assisted in a wonderfully rapid development of +arts and manufactures.</p> + +<p>When, a thousand years after Christ, the centre of intellectual +activity and of material civilization had drifted +westward into Andalusia, the foundation of every modern +physical science except that now just taking shape—the +all-grasping science of energetics—had been laid with experimentally +derived facts; and in mathematics there had +been erected a symmetrical and elegant superstructure. +Even that underlying principle of all the sciences, the principle +of the persistence of energy, had been, perhaps unwittingly, +enunciated.</p> + +<p>Distinguished historians have shown how the progress +of civilization in Europe resulted in the creation, during +the middle ages, of the now great middle class, which, holding +the control of political power, governs every civilized +nation, and has come into power so gradually that it was +only after centuries that its influence was seen and felt. +This, which Buckle<a name="FNanchor_104_104" id="FNanchor_104_104"></a><a +href="#Footnote_104_104" class="fnanchor">[104]</a> calls the intellectual class, first became +active, independently of the military and of the clergy, in +the fourteenth century. In the two succeeding centuries +this class gained power and influence; and in the seventeenth +century we find a magnificent advance in all branches +of science, literature, and art, marking the complete emancipation +of the intellect from the artificial conditions which +had so long repressed its every effort at advancement.</p> + +<p>Another great social revolution thus occurred, following +another period of centuries of intellectual stagnation. +The Saracen invaders were driven from Europe; the Crusaders +invaded Palestine, in the vain effort to recover from +the hands of the infidels the Holy Sepulchre and the Holy<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_428" id="Page_428">[428]</a></span> +Land; and intestine broils and inter-state conflicts, as well +as these greater social movements, withdrew the minds of +men once more from the arts of peace and the pursuits of +scholars. It is not, then, until the beginning of the seventeenth +century—the time of Galileo and of Newton—that we +find the nations of Europe sufficiently quiet and secure to +permit general attention to intellectual vocations, although it +was a half-century earlier (1543) that Copernicus left to the +world that legacy which revolutionized the theories of the +astronomers and established as correct the hypothesis which +made the sun the centre of the solar system.</p> + +<p>Galileo now began to overturn the speculations of the +deductive philosophers, and to proclaim the still disputed +principle that the book of Nature is a trustworthy commentary +in the study of theological and revealed truths, so +far as they affect or are affected by science; he suffered +martyrdom when he proclaimed the fact that God’s laws, +as they now stand, had been instituted without deference +to the preconceived notions of the most ignorant of men. +Bruno had a few years earlier (1600) been burned at the +stake for a similar offense.</p> + +<p>Galileo was perhaps the first, too, to combine invariably +in application the idea of Plato, the philosophy of Aristotle, +and the methods of modern experimentation, to form +the now universal scientific method of experimental philosophy. +He showed plainly how the grouping of ascertained +facts, in natural sequence, leads to the revelation of the law +of that sequence, and indicated the existence of a principle +which is now known as the law of continuity—the law that +in all the operations of Nature there is to be seen an unbroken +chain of effect leading from the present back into a +known or an unknown past, toward a cause which may or +may not be determinable by science or known to history.</p> + +<p>Galileo, the Italian, was worthily matched by Newton, +the prince of English philosophers. The science of theoretical +mechanics was hardly beginning to assume the position<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_429" id="Page_429">[429]</a></span> +which it was afterward given among the sciences; and +the grand work of collating facts already ascertained, and +of definitely stating principles which had previously been +vaguely recognized, was splendidly done by Newton. The +needs of physical astronomy urged this work upon him.</p> + +<p>Da Vinci had, in the latter half of the fifteenth century, +summarized as much of the statics of mechanical philosophy +as had, up to his time, been given shape; he also rewrote +and added very much to what was known on the subject of +friction, and enunciated its laws. He had evidently a good +idea of the principle of “virtual velocities,” that simple +case of equivalence of work, in a connected system, which +has done such excellent service since; and with his mechanical +philosophy this versatile engineer and artist curiously +mingled much of physical science. Then Stevinus, the +“brave engineer of Bruges,” a hundred years later (1586), +alternating office and field work, somewhat after the manner +of the engineer of to-day, wrote a treatise on mechanics, +which showed the value of practical experience and judgment +in even scientific work. And thus the path had been +cleared for Newton.</p> + +<p>Meantime, also, Kepler had hit upon the true relations +of the distances of the planets and their periodic times, +after spending half a generation in blindly groping for them, +thus furnishing those great landmarks of fact in the mechanics +of astronomy; and Galileo had enunciated the laws +of motion. Thus the foundation of the science of dynamics, +as distinguished from statics, was laid, and the beginning +was made of that later science of energetics, of which +the philosophy of the steam-engine is so largely constituted.</p> + +<p>Hooke, Huyghens, and others, had already seen some of +the principal consequences of these laws; but it remained for +Newton to enunciate them with the precision of a true mathematician, +and to base upon them a system of dynamical laws, +which, complemented by his announcement of the existence +of the force of gravitation, and his statement of its laws,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_430" id="Page_430">[430]</a></span> +gave a firm basis for all that the astronomer has since done +in those quantitative determinations of size, weight, and distance, +and of the movements of the heavenly bodies, which +compel the wonder and admiration of mankind.</p> + +<p>The Arabians and Greeks had noticed that the direction +taken by a body falling under the action of gravitation was +directly toward the centre of the earth, wherever its fall +might occur; Galileo had shown, by his experiments at +Pisa, that the velocity of fall, second after second, varied +as the numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc., and that the distances +varied as the squares of the total periods of time during +which the body was falling, and that it was, in British +feet, very nearly sixteen times the square of that time in +seconds. Kepler had proved that the movements of the +heavenly bodies were just such as would occur under the +action of central attractive forces and of centrifugal force.</p> + +<p>Putting all these things together, Newton was led to +believe that there existed a “force of gravity,” due to the +attraction, by the great mass of the earth, of its own particles +and of neighboring bodies, like the moon, of which +force the influence extended as far, at least, as the latter. +He calculated the motion of the earth’s satellite, on the +assumption that his theory and the then accepted measurements +of the earth’s dimensions were correct, and obtained +a roughly approximate result. Later, in 1679, he revised +his calculations, using Picard’s more accurate determination +of the dimensions of the earth, and obtained a result +which precisely tallied with careful measurements, made by +the astronomers, of the moon’s motion.</p> + +<p>The science of mechanics had now, with the publication +of Newton’s “<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/28233">Principia</a>,” become thoroughly consistent and +logically complete, so far as was possible without a knowledge +of the principles of energetics; and Newton’s enunciations +of the laws of motion, concise and absolutely perfect +as they still seem, were the basis of the whole science +of dynamics, as applied to bodies moving freely under the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_431" id="Page_431">[431]</a></span> +action of applied forces, either constant or variable. They +are as perfect a basis for that science as are the primary +principles of geometry for the whole beautiful structure +which is built up on them.</p> + +<p>The three perfect qualitative expressions of dynamical +law are:</p> + +<p>1. Every free body continues in the state in which it +may be, whether of rest or of rectilinear uniform motion, +until compelled to deviate from that state by impressed +forces.</p> + +<p>2. Change of motion is proportional to the force impressed, +and in the direction of the right line in which that +force acts.</p> + +<p>3. Action is always opposed by reaction; action and +reaction are equal, and in directly contrary directions.</p> + +<p>We may add to these principles a definition of a force, +which is equally and absolutely complete:</p> + +<p><i>Force</i> is that which produces, or tends to produce, motion, +or change of motion, in bodies. It is measured statically +by the weight that will counterpoise it, or by the +pressure which it will produce, and dynamically by the velocity +which it will produce, acting in the unit of time on +the unit of mass.</p> + +<p>The quantitative determinations of dynamic effects of +forces are always readily made when it is remembered that +the effect of a force equal to its own weight, when the body +is free to move, is to produce in one second a velocity of +32.2 feet per second, which quantity is the unit of dynamic +measurement.</p> + +<p><i>Work</i> is the product of the resistance met in any instance +of the exertion of a force, into the distance through +which that force overcomes the resistance.</p> + +<p><i>Energy</i> is the work which a body is capable of doing, +by its weight or inertia, under given conditions. The energy +of a falling body, or of a flying shot, is about <span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">64</span> its +weight multiplied by the square of its velocity, or, which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_432" id="Page_432">[432]</a></span> +is the same thing, the product of its weight into the height +of fall or height due its velocity. These principles and +definitions, with the long-settled definitions of the primary +ideas of space and time, were all that were needed to lead +the way to that grandest of all physical generalizations, +the doctrine of the persistence or conservation of all energy, +and to its corollary declaring the equivalence of all forms +of energy, and also to the experimental demonstration of +the transformability of energy from one mode of existence +to another, and its universal existence in the various modes +of motion of bodies and of their molecules.</p> + +<p>Experimental physical science had hardly become acknowledged +as the only and the proper method of acquiring +knowledge of natural phenomena at the time of Newton; +but it soon became a generally accepted principle. In +physics, Gilbert had made valuable investigations before +Newton, and Galileo’s experiments at Pisa had been examples +of similarly useful research. In chemistry, it was only +when, a century later, Lavoisier showed by his splendid example +what could be done by the skillful and intelligent +use of quantitative measurements, and made the balance +the chemist’s most important tool, that a science was formed +comprehending all the facts and laws of chemical change +and molecular combination. We have already seen how +astronomy and mathematics together led philosophers to +the creation and the study of what finally became the science +of mechanics, when experiment and observation were finally +brought to their aid. We can now see how, in all these +physical sciences, four primitive ideas are comprehended: +matter, force, motion, and space—which latter two terms +include all relations of position.</p> + +<p>Based on these notions, the science of mechanics comprehends +four sections, which are of general application in +the study of all physical phenomena. These are:</p> + +<p><i>Statics</i>, which treats of the action and effect of forces.</p> + +<p><i>Kinematics</i>, which treats of relations of motion simply.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_433" id="Page_433">[433]</a></span></p> + +<p><i>Dynamics</i>, or kinetics, which treats of simple motion as +an effect of the action of forces.</p> + +<p><i>Energetics</i>, which treats of modifications of energy +under the action of forces, and of its transformation from +one mode of manifestation to another, and from one body +to another.</p> + +<p>Under the latter of these four divisions of mechanical +philosophy is comprehended that latest of the minor sciences, +of which the heat-engines, and especially the steam-engine, +illustrate the most important applications—<i>Thermo-dynamics</i>. +This science is simply a wider generalization +of principles which, as we have seen, have been established +one at a time, and by philosophers widely separated both +geographically and historically, by both space and time, +and which have been slowly aggregated to form one after +another of the sciences, and out of which, as we now are +beginning to see, we are slowly evolving wider generalizations, +and thus tending toward a condition of scientific +knowledge which renders more and more probable the truth +of Cicero’s declaration: “One eternal and immutable law +embraces all things and all times.” At the basis of the +whole science of energetics lies a principle which was enunciated +before Science had a birthplace or a name:</p> + +<p><i>All that exists, whether matter or force, and in whatever +form, is indestructible, except by the Infinite Power +which has created it.</i></p> + +<p>That matter is indestructible by finite power became +admitted as soon as the chemists, led by their great teacher +Lavoisier, began to apply the balance, and were thus able +to show that in all chemical change there occurs only a +modification of form or of combination of elements, and +no loss of matter ever takes place. The “persistence” of +energy was a later discovery, consequent largely upon the +experimental determination of the convertibility of heat-energy +into other forms and into mechanical work, for +which we are indebted to Rumford and Davy, and to the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_434" id="Page_434">[434]</a></span> +determination of the quantivalence anticipated by Newton, +shown and calculated approximately by Colding and Mayer, +and measured with great probable accuracy by Joule.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port13" id="Port13"></a> +<img src="images/illo461.png" alt="Thompson" width="350" height="410" /> +<p class="caption">Benjamin Thompson, Count Rumford.</p></div> + +<p>The great fact of the conservation of energy was loosely +stated by Newton, who asserted that the work of friction +and the <i>vis viva</i> of the system or body arrested by friction +were equivalent. In 1798, Benjamin Thompson, Count +Rumford, an American who was then in the Bavarian service, +presented a paper<a name="FNanchor_105_105" id="FNanchor_105_105"></a><a href="#Footnote_105_105" +class="fnanchor">[105]</a> to the Royal Society of Great +Britain, in which he stated the results of an experiment +which he had recently made, proving the immateriality of +heat and the transformation of mechanical into heat energy.<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_435" id="Page_435">[435]</a></span> +This paper is of very great historical interest, as the now +accepted doctrine of the persistence of energy is a generalization +which arose out of a series of investigations, the +most important of which are those which resulted in the +determination of the existence of a definite quantivalent +relation between these two forms of energy and a measurement +of its value, now known as the “mechanical equivalent +of heat.” His experiment consisted in the determination +of the quantity of heat produced by the boring of a +cannon at the arsenal at Munich.</p> + +<p>Rumford, after showing that this heat could not have +been derived from any of the surrounding objects, or by +compression of the materials employed or acted upon, says: +“It appears to me extremely difficult, if not impossible, to +form any distinct idea of anything capable of being excited +and communicated in the manner that heat was excited and +communicated in these experiments, except it be motion.”<a name="FNanchor_106_106" +id="FNanchor_106_106"></a><a href="#Footnote_106_106" class="fnanchor">[106]</a> +He then goes on to urge a zealous and persistent investigation +of the laws which govern this motion. He estimates +the heat produced by a power which he states could easily +be exerted by one horse, and makes it equal to the “combustion +of nine wax candles, each three-quarters of an inch +in diameter,” and equivalent to the elevation of “25.68 +pounds of ice-cold water” to the boiling-point, or 4,784.4 +heat-units.<a name="FNanchor_107_107" id="FNanchor_107_107"></a><a href="#Footnote_107_107" +class="fnanchor">[107]</a> The time was stated at “150 minutes.” Taking +the actual power of Rumford’s Bavarian “one horse” +as the most probable figure, 25,000 pounds raised one foot +high per minute,<a name="FNanchor_108_108" id="FNanchor_108_108"></a><a +href="#Footnote_108_108" class="fnanchor">[108]</a> this +gives the “mechanical equivalent”<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_436" id="Page_436">[436]</a></span> +of the foot-pound as 783.8 heat-units, differing but 1.5 per +cent. from the now accepted value.</p> + +<p>Had Rumford been able to eliminate all losses of heat +by evaporation, radiation, and conduction, to which losses +he refers, and to measure the power exerted with accuracy, +the approximation would have been still closer. Rumford +thus made the experimental discovery of the real nature +of heat, proving it to be a form of energy, and, publishing +the fact a half-century before the now standard determinations +were made, gave us a very close approximation to +the value of the heat-equivalent. Rumford also observed +that the heat generated was “exactly proportional to the +force with which the two surfaces are pressed together, +and to the rapidity of the friction,” which is a simple statement +of equivalence between the quantity of work done, or +energy expended, and the quantity of heat produced. This +was the first great step toward the formation of a Science +of Thermo-dynamics. Rumford’s work was the corner-stone +of the science.</p> + +<p>Sir Humphry Davy, a little later (1799), published the +details of an experiment which conclusively confirmed these +deductions from Rumford’s work. He rubbed two pieces +of ice together, and found that they were melted by the +friction so produced. He thereupon concluded: “It is evident +that ice by friction is converted into water.... Friction, +consequently, does not diminish the capacity of bodies +for heat.”</p> + +<p>Bacon and Newton, and Hooke and Boyle, seem to +have anticipated—long before Rumford’s time—all later +philosophers, in admitting the probable correctness of that +modern dynamical, or vibratory, theory of heat which considers +it a mode of motion; but Davy, in 1812, for the first<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_437" id="Page_437">[437]</a></span> +time, stated plainly and precisely the real nature of heat, +saying: “The immediate cause of the phenomenon of heat, +then, is motion, and the laws of its communication are precisely +the same as the laws of the communication of motion.” +The basis of this opinion was the same that had +previously been noted by Rumford.</p> + +<p>So much having been determined, it became at once evident +that the determination of the exact value of the mechanical +equivalent of heat was simply a matter of experiment; +and during the succeeding generation this determination +was made, with greater or less exactness, by several +distinguished men. It was also equally evident that the +laws governing the new science of thermo-dynamics could +be mathematically expressed.</p> + +<p>Fourier had, before the date last given, applied mathematical +analysis in the solution of problems relating to the +transfer of heat without transformation, and his “Théorie +de la Chaleur” contained an exceedingly beautiful treatment +of the subject. Sadi Carnot, twelve years later (1824), +published his “Réflexions sur la Puissance Motrice du Feu,” +in which he made a first attempt to express the principles +involved in the application of heat to the production of +mechanical effect. Starting with the axiom that a body +which, having passed through a series of conditions modifying +its temperature, is returned to “its primitive physical +state as to density, temperature, and molecular constitution,” +must contain the same quantity of heat which it had +contained originally, he shows that the efficiency of heat-engines +is to be determined by carrying the working fluid +through a complete cycle, beginning and ending with the +same set of conditions. Carnot had not then accepted the +vibratory theory of heat, and consequently was led into +some errors; but, as will be seen hereafter, the idea just +expressed is one of the most important details of a theory +of the steam-engine.</p> + +<p>Seguin, who has already been mentioned as one of the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_438" id="Page_438">[438]</a></span> +first to use the fire-tubular boiler for locomotive engines, +published in 1839 a work, “Sur l’Influence des Chemins de +Fer,” in which he gave the requisite data for a rough determination +of the value of the mechanical equivalent of +heat, although he does not himself deduce that value.</p> + +<p>Dr. Julius R. Mayer, three years later (1842), published +the results of a very ingenious and quite closely approximate +calculation of the heat-equivalent, basing his +estimate upon the work necessary to compress air, and on +the specific heats of the gas, the idea being that the work +of compression is the equivalent of the heat generated. +Seguin had taken the converse operation, taking the loss of +heat of expanding steam as the equivalent of the work done +by the steam while expanding. The latter also was the +first to point out the fact, afterward experimentally proved +by Hirn, that the fluid exhausted from an engine should +heat the water of condensation less than would the same +fluid when originally taken into the engine.</p> + +<p>A Danish engineer, Colding, at about the same time +(1843), published the results of experiments made to determine +the same quantity; but the best and most extended +work, and that which is now almost universally accepted as +standard, was done by a British investigator.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port14" id="Port14"></a> +<img src="images/illo466.png" alt="Joule" width="350" height="408" /> +<p class="caption">James Prescott Joule.</p></div> + +<p><a href="#Port14">James Prescott Joule</a> commenced the experimental investigations +which have made him famous at some time +previous to 1843, at which date he published, in the +<i>Philosophical Magazine</i>, his earliest method. His first determination +gave 770 foot-pounds. During the succeeding +five or six years Joule repeated his work, adopting a considerable +variety of methods, and obtaining very variable +results. One method was to determine the heat produced +by forcing air through tubes; another, and his usual plan, +was to turn a paddle-wheel by a definite power in a known +weight of water. He finally, in 1849, concluded these +researches.</p> + +<p>The method of calculating the mechanical equivalent of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_439" id="Page_439">[439]</a></span> +heat which was adopted by Dr. Mayer, of Heilbronn, is as +beautiful as it is ingenious: Conceive two equal portions of +atmospheric air to be inclosed, at the same temperature—as +at the freezing-point—in vessels each capable of containing +one cubic foot; communicate heat to both, retaining the +one portion at the original volume, and permitting the other +to expand under a constant pressure equal to that of the +atmosphere. In each vessel there will be inclosed 0.08073 +pound, or 1.29 ounce, of air. When, at the same temperature, +the one has doubled its pressure and the other has +doubled its volume, each will be at a temperature of 525.2° +Fahr., or 274° C, and each will have double the original +temperature, as measured on the absolute scale from the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_440" id="Page_440">[440]</a></span> +zero of heat-motion. But the one will have absorbed but +6<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span> British thermal units, while the other will have absorbed +9<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span>. In the first case, all of this heat will have been employed +in simply increasing the temperature of the air; in +the second case, the temperature of the air will have been +equally increased, and, besides, a certain amount of work—2,116.3 +foot-pounds—must have been done in overcoming +the resistance of the air; it is to this latter action that we +must debit the additional heat which has disappeared. Now, +(2,116.3/2<span class="enum">3</span>∕<span class="denom">4</span>) = 770 foot-pounds per heat-unit—almost precisely +the value derived from Joule’s experiments. Had Mayer’s +measurement been absolutely accurate, the result of his +calculation would have been an exact determination of the +heat-equivalent, provided no heat is, in this case, lost by +internal work.</p> + +<p>Joule’s most probably accurate measure was obtained +by the use of a paddle-wheel revolving in water or other +fluid. A copper vessel contained a carefully weighed portion +of the fluid, and at the bottom was a step, on which +stood a vertical spindle carrying the paddle-wheel. This +wheel was turned by cords passing over nicely-balanced +grooved wheels, the axles of which were carried on friction-rollers. +Weights hung at the ends of these cords were +the moving forces. Falling to the ground, they exerted an +easily and accurately determinable amount of work, <i>W</i> × <i>H</i>, +which turned the paddle-wheel a definite number of revolutions, +warming the water by the production of an amount +of heat exactly equivalent to the amount of work done. +After the weight had been raised and this operation repeated +a sufficient number of times, the quantity of heat +communicated to the water was carefully determined and +compared with the amount of work expended in its development. +Joule also used a pair of disks of iron rubbing +against each other in a vessel of mercury, and measured +the heat thus developed by friction, comparing it with the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_441" id="Page_441">[441]</a></span> +work done. The average of forty experiments with water +gave the equivalent 772.692 foot-pounds; fifty with mercury +gave 774.083; twenty with cast-iron gave 774.987—the +temperature of the apparatus being from 55° to 60° +Fahr.</p> + +<p>Joule also determined, by experiment, the fact that the +expansion of air or other gas without doing work produces +no change of temperature, which fact is predicable from +the now known principles of thermo-dynamics. He stated +the results of his researches relating to the mechanical +equivalent of heat as follows:</p> + +<p>1. The heat produced by the friction of bodies, whether +solid or liquid, is always proportional to the quantity of +work expended.</p> + +<p>2. The quantity required to increase the temperature of +a pound of water (weighed <i>in vacuo</i> at 55° to 60° Fahr.) by +one degree requires for its production the expenditure of a +force measured by the fall of 772 pounds from a height of +one foot. This quantity is now generally called “Joule’s +equivalent.”</p> + +<p>During this series of experiments, Joule also deduced +the position of the “absolute zero,” the point at which heat-motion +ceases, and stated it to be about 480° Fahr. below +the freezing-point of water, which is not very far from the +probably true value,-493.2° Fahr. (-273° C.), as deduced +afterward from more precise data.</p> + +<p>The result of these, and of the later experiments of +Hirn and others, has been the admission of the following +principle:</p> + +<p>Heat-energy and mechanical energy are mutually convertible +and have a definite equivalence, the British thermal +unit being equivalent to 772 foot-pounds of work, and the +metric <i>calorie</i> to 423.55, or, as usually taken, 424 kilogrammetres. +The exact measure is not fully determined, however.</p> + +<p>It has now become generally admitted that all forms of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_442" id="Page_442">[442]</a></span> +energy due to physical forces are mutually convertible with +a definite quantivalence; and it is not yet determined that +even vital and mental energy do not fall within the same +great generalization. This quantivalence is the sole basis +of the science of Energetics.</p> + +<p>The study of this science has been, up to the present +time, principally confined to that portion which comprehends +the relations of heat and mechanical energy. In the +study of this department of the science, thermo-dynamics, +Rankine, Clausius, Thompson, Hirn, and others have acquired +great distinction. In the investigations which have +been made by these authorities, the methods of transfer of +heat and of modification of physical state in gases and vapors, +when a change occurs in the form of the energy considered, +have been the subjects of especial study.</p> + +<p>According to the law of Boyle and Marriotte, the expansion +of such fluids follows a law expressed graphically +by the hyperbola, and algebraically by the expression +PV<sup><i>x</i></sup> = A, in which, with unchanging temperature, <i>x</i> is equal +to 1. One of the first and most evident deductions from the +principles of the equivalence of the several forms of energy +is that the value of x must increase as the energy expended +in expansion increases. This change is very marked with +a vapor like steam—which, expanded without doing work, +has an exponent less than unity, and which, when doing +work by expanding behind a piston, partially condenses, the +value of <i>x</i> increases to, in the case of steam, 1.111 according +to Rankine, or, probably more correctly, to 1.135 or more, +according to Zeuner and Grashof. This fact has an important +bearing upon the theory of the steam-engine, and +we are indebted to Rankine for the first complete treatise +on that theory as thus modified.</p> + +<div class="figcenter"><a name="Port15" id="Port15"></a> +<img src="images/illo470.png" alt="Rankine" width="350" height="409" /> +<p class="caption">Prof. W. J. M. Rankine.</p></div> + +<p><a href="#Port15">Prof. Rankine</a> began his investigations as early as 1849, +at which time he proposed his theory of the molecular constitution +of matter, now well known as the theory of molecular +vortices. He supposes a system of whirling rings or<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_443" id="Page_443">[443]</a></span> +vortices of heat-motion, and bases his philosophy upon that +hypothesis, supposing sensible heat to be employed in changing +the velocity of the particles, latent heat to be the work +of altering the dimensions of the orbits, and considering the +effort of each vortex to enlarge its boundaries to be due to +centrifugal force. He distinguished between real and apparent +specific heat, and showed that the two methods of +absorption of heat, in the case of the heating of a fluid, that +due to simple increase of temperature and that due to increase +of volume, should be distinguished; he proposed, for +the latter quantity, the term heat-potential, and for the sum +of the two, the name of thermo-dynamic function.</p> + +<p>Carnot had stated, a quarter of a century earlier, that +the efficiency of a heat-engine is a function of the two limits +of temperature between which the machine is worked, and<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_444" id="Page_444">[444]</a></span> +not of the nature of the working substance—an assertion +which is quite true where the material does not change its +physical state while working. Rankine now deduced that +“general equation of thermo-dynamics” which expresses +algebraically the relations between heat and mechanical +energy, when energy is changing from the one state to the +other, in which equation is given, for any assumed change +of the fluids, the quantity of heat transformed. He showed +that steam in the engine must be partially liquefied by the +process of expanding against a resistance, and proved that +the total heat of a perfect gas must increase with rise of +temperature at a rate proportional to its specific heat under +constant pressure.</p> + +<p>Rankine, in 1850, showed the inaccuracy of the then +accepted value, 0.2669, of the specific heat of air under constant +pressure, and calculated its value as 0.24. Three +years later, the experiments of Regnault gave the value +0.2379, and Rankine, recalculating it, made it 0.2377. In +1851, Rankine continued his discussion of the subject, and, +by his own theory, corroborated Thompson’s law giving the +efficiency of a perfect heat-engine as the quotient of the +range of working temperature to the temperature of the +upper limit, measured from the absolute zero.</p> + +<p>During this period, Clausius, the German physicist, was +working on the same subject, taking quite a different +method, studying the mechanical effects of heat in gases, +and deducing, almost simultaneously with Rankine (1850), +the general equation which lies at the beginning of the +theory of the equivalence of heat and mechanical energy. +He found that the probable zero of heat-motion is at such a +point that the Carnot function must be approximately the +reciprocal of the “absolute” temperature, as measured with +the air thermometer, or, stated exactly, that quantity as determined +by a perfect gas thermometer. He confirmed Rankine’s +conclusion relative to the liquefaction of saturated +vapors when expanding against resistance, and, in 1854,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_445" id="Page_445">[445]</a></span> +adapted Carnot’s principle to the new theory, and showed +that his idea of the reversible engine and of the performance +of a cycle in testing the changes produced still held good, +notwithstanding Carnot’s ignorance of the true nature of +heat. Clausius also gave us the extremely important principle: +It is impossible for a self-acting machine, unaided, to +transfer heat from one body at a low temperature to another +having a higher temperature.</p> + +<p>Simultaneously with Rankine and Clausius, Prof. William +Thomson was engaged in researches in thermo-dynamics +(1850). He was the first to express the principle of +Carnot as adapted to the modern theory by Clausius in the +now generally quoted propositions:<a name="FNanchor_109_109" id="FNanchor_109_109"></a><a +href="#Footnote_109_109" class="fnanchor">[109]</a></p> + +<p>1. When equal mechanical effects are produced by purely +thermal action, equal quantities of heat are produced or +disappear by transformation of energy.</p> + +<p>2. If, in any engine, a reversal effects complete inversion +of all the physical and mechanical details of its operation, +it is a perfect engine, and produces maximum effect with +any given quantity of heat and with any fixed limits of +range of temperature.</p> + +<p>William Thomson and James Thompson showed, among +the earliest of their deductions from these principles, the fact, +afterward confirmed by experiment, that the melting-point +of ice should be lowered by pressure 0.0135° Fahr, for each +atmosphere, and that a body which contracts while being +heated will always have its temperature decreased by sudden +compression. Thomson applied the principles of energetics +in extended investigations in the department of electricity, +while Helmholtz carried some of the same methods +into his favorite study of acoustics.</p> + +<p>The application of now well-settled principles to the +physics of gases led to many interesting and important deductions:<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_446" id="Page_446">[446]</a></span> +Clausius explained the relations between the volume, +density, temperature, and pressure of gases, and their +modifications; Maxwell reëstablished the experimentally +determined law of Dalton and Charles, known also as that +of Gay-Lussac (1801), which asserts that all masses of equal +pressure, volume, and temperature, contain equal numbers +of molecules. On the Continent of Europe, also, Hirn, +Zeuner, Grashof, Tresca, Laboulaye, and others have, during +the same period and since, continued and greatly extended +these theoretical researches.</p> + +<p>During all this time, a vast amount of experimental +work has also been done, resulting in the determination of +important data without which all the preceding labor would +have been fruitless. Of those who have engaged in such +work, Cagniard de la Tour, Andrews, Regnault, Hirn, Fairbairn +and Tate, Laboulaye, Tresca, and a few others have +directed their researches in this most important direction +with the special object of aiding in the advancement of the +new-born sciences. By the middle of the present century, +the time which we are now studying, this set of data was +tolerably complete. Boyle had, two hundred years before, +discovered and published the law, which is now known by +his name<a name="FNanchor_110_110" id="FNanchor_110_110"></a><a +href="#Footnote_110_110" class="fnanchor">[110]</a> and by that of Marriotte,<a +name="FNanchor_111_111" id="FNanchor_111_111"></a><a href="#Footnote_111_111" class="fnanchor">[111]</a> that the pressure of a +gas varies inversely as its volume and directly as its density; +Dr. Black and James Watt discovered, a hundred years +later (1760), the latent heat of vapors, and Watt determined +the method of expansion of steam; Dalton, in England, and +Gay-Lussac, in France, showed, at the beginning of the +nineteenth century, that all gaseous fluids are expanded by +equal fractions of their volume by equal increments of temperature; +Watt and Robison had given tables of the elastic +force of steam, and Gren had shown that, at the temperature<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_447" id="Page_447">[447]</a></span> +of boiling water, the pressure of steam was equal +to that of the atmosphere; Dalton, Ure, and others proved +(1800-1818) that the law connecting temperatures and pressures +of steam was expressed by a geometrical ratio; and +Biot had already given an approximate formula, when +Southern introduced another, which is still in use.</p> + +<p>The French Government established a commission in +1823 to experiment with a view to the institution of legislation +regulating the working of steam-engines and boilers; +and this commission, MM. de Prony, Arago, Girard, and +Dulong, determined quite accurately the temperatures of +steam under pressures running up to twenty-four atmospheres, +giving a formula for the calculation of the one +quantity, the other being known. Ten years later, the Government +of the United States instituted similar experiments +under the direction of the Franklin Institute.</p> + +<p>The marked distinction between gases, like oxygen and +hydrogen, and condensible vapors, like steam and carbonic +acid, had been, at this time, shown by Cagniard de la Tour, +who, in 1822, studied their behavior at high temperatures +and under very great pressures. He found that, when a +vapor was confined in a glass tube in presence of the same +substance in the liquid state, as where steam and water were +confined together, if the temperature was increased to a +certain definite point, the whole mass suddenly became of +uniform character, and the previously existing line of demarkation +vanished, the whole mass of fluid becoming, as +he inferred, gaseous. It was at about this time that Faraday +made known his then novel experiments, in which gases +which had been before supposed permanent were liquefied, +simply by subjecting them to enormous pressures. He then +also first stated that, above certain temperatures, liquefaction +of vapors was impossible, however great the pressure.</p> + +<p>Faraday’s conclusion was justified by the researches of +Dr. Andrews, who has since most successfully extended the +investigation commenced by Cagniard de la Tour, and who has<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_448" id="Page_448">[448]</a></span> +shown that, at a certain point, which he calls the “critical +point,” the properties of the two states of the fluid fade into +each other, and that, at that point, the two become continuous. +With carbonic acid, this occurs at 75 atmospheres, +about 1,125 pounds per square inch, a pressure which would +counterbalance a column of mercury 60 yards, or nearly as +many metres, high. The temperature at this point is about +90° Fahr., or 31° Cent. For ether, the temperature is 370° +Fahr., and the pressure 38 atmospheres; for alcohol, they +are 498° Fahr., and 120 atmospheres; and for bisulphide of +carbon, 505° Fahr., and 67 atmospheres. For water, the +pressure is too high to be determined; but the temperature +is about 775° Fahr., or 413° Cent.</p> + +<p>Donny and Dufour have shown that these normal properties +of vapors and liquids are subject to modification by +certain conditions, as previously (1818) noted by Gay-Lussac, +and have pointed out the bearing of this fact upon the +safety of steam-boilers. It was discovered that the boiling-point +of water could be elevated far above its ordinary temperature +of ebullition by expedients which deprive the +liquid of the air usually condensed within its mass, and +which prevent contact with rough or metallic surfaces. +By suspension in a mixture of oils which is of nearly the +same density, Dufour raised drops of water under atmospheric +pressure to a temperature of 356° Fahr.—180° Cent.—the +temperature of steam of about 150 pounds per square +inch. Prof. James Thompson has, on theoretical grounds, +indicated that a somewhat similar action may enable vapor, +under some conditions, to be cooled below the normal temperature +of condensation, without liquefaction.</p> + +<p>Fairbairn and Tate repeated the attempt to determine +the volume and temperature of water at pressures extending +beyond those in use in the steam-engine, and incomplete +determinations have also been made by others.</p> + +<p>Regnault is the standard authority on these data. His +experiments (1847) were made at the expense of the French<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_449" id="Page_449">[449]</a></span> +Government, and under the direction of the French Academy. +They were wonderfully accurate, and extended through +a very wide range of temperatures and pressures. The results +remain standard after the lapse of a quarter of a century, +and are regarded as models of precise physical work.<a name="FNanchor_112_112" +id="FNanchor_112_112"></a><a href="#Footnote_112_112" class="fnanchor">[112]</a></p> + +<p>Regnault found that the total heat of steam is not constant, +but that the latent heat varies, and that the sum of +the latent and sensible heats, or the total heat, increases +0.305 of a degree for each degree of increase in the sensible +heat, making 0.305 the specific heat of saturated steam. He +found the specific heat of superheated steam to be 0.4805.</p> + +<p>Regnault promptly detected the fact that steam was not +subject to Boyle’s law, and showed that the difference is +very marked. In expressing his results, he not only tabulated +them but also laid them down graphically; he further +determined exact constants for Biot’s algebraic expression,</p> + +<p class="ind10">log. <i>p</i> = <i>a</i> - <i>b</i>A<sup><i>x</i></sup> - <i>c</i>B<sup><i>x</i></sup>;</p> + +<p>making <i>x</i> = 20 + <i>t</i>° Cent.; <i>a</i> = 6.264035; log. <i>b</i> = +0.1397743; log. <i>c</i> = 0.6924351; log. A = <span class="bt">1</span>.9940493, and +log. B = <span class="bt">1</span>.9983439; <i>p</i> is the pressure in atmospheres. +Regnault, in the expression for the total heat, H = A + <i>bt</i>, +determined on the centigrade scale <i>θ</i> = 606.5 + 0.305 <i>t</i> Cent. +For the Fahrenheit scale, we have the following equivalent +expressions:</p> + +<table class="ind10 left" summary="Formulae 449-1"> + +<tr> +<td>H</td> +<td> = </td> +<td colspan="4">1,113.44° + 0.305 <i>t</i>° Fahr., if measured from 0° Fahr.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td> = </td> +<td>1,091.9° </td> +<td>+ 0.305 (<i>t</i>° - 32) Fahr.,</td> +<td rowspan="2"><span class="fsize180"> } </span></td> +<td>if measured from</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td> = </td> +<td>1,081.94° </td> +<td>+ 0.305 <i>t</i>° Fahr.,</td> +<td>the freezing-point.</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>For latent heat, we have:</p> + +<table class="ind10 left" summary="Formulae 449-2"> + +<tr> +<td>L</td> +<td> = </td> +<td>606.5° </td> +<td>- 0.695 <i>t</i>° Cent.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td> = </td> +<td>1,091.7° </td> +<td>- 0.695 (<i>t</i>° - 32) Fahr.</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> </td> +<td> = </td> +<td>1,113.94° </td> +<td>- 0.695 <i>t</i>° Fahr.</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_450" id="Page_450">[450]</a></span>Since Regnault’s time, nothing of importance has been +done in this direction. There still remains much work to +be done in the extension of the research to higher pressures, +and under conditions which obtain in the operation of the +steam-engine. The volumes and densities of steam require +further study, and the behavior of steam in the engine is +still but little known, otherwise than theoretically. Even +the true value of Joule’s equivalent is not undisputed.</p> + +<p>Some of the most recent experimental work bearing +directly upon the philosophy of the steam-engine is that of +Hirn, whose determination of the value of the mechanical +equivalent was less than two per cent. below that of Joule. +Hirn tested by experiment, in 1853, and repeatedly up to +1876, the analytical work of Rankine, which led to the conclusion +that steam doing work by expansion must become +gradually liquefied. Constructing a glass steam-engine +cylinder, he was enabled to see plainly the clouds of mist +which were produced by the expansion of steam behind the +piston, where Regnault’s experiments prove that the steam +should become drier and superheated, were no heat transformed +into mechanical energy. As will be seen hereafter, +this great discovery of Rankine is more important in its +bearing upon the theory of the steam-engine than any made +during the century. Hirn’s confirmation stands, in value, +beside the original discovery. In 1858 Hirn confirmed the +work of Mayer and Joule by determining the work done +and the carbonic acid produced, as well as the increased +temperature due to their presence, where men were set at +work in a treadmill; he found the elevation of temperature +to be much greater in proportion to gas produced when the +men were resting than when they were at work. He thus +proved conclusively the conversion of heat-energy into mechanical +work. It was from these experiments that Helmholtz +deduced the “modulus of efficiency” of the human +machine at one-fifth, and concluded that the heart works +with eight times the efficiency of a locomotive-engine, thus<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_451" id="Page_451">[451]</a></span> +confirming a statement of Rumford, who asserted the higher +efficiency of the animal.</p> + +<p>Hirn’s most important experiments in this department +were made upon steam-engines of considerable size, including +simple and compound engines, and using steam sometimes +saturated and sometimes superheated to temperatures +as high, on some occasions, as 340° Cent. He determined the +work done, the quantity of heat entering, and the amount +rejected from, the steam-cylinder, and thus obtained a +coarse approximation to the value of the heat-equivalent. +His figure varied from 296 to 337 kilogrammetres. But, in +all cases, the loss of heat due to work done was marked, +and, while these researches could not, in the nature of the +case, give accurate quantitative results, they are of great +value as qualitatively confirming Mayer and Joule, and +proving the transformation of energy.</p> + +<p>Thus, as we have seen, experimental investigation and +analytical research have together created a new science, +and the philosophy of the steam-engine has at last been +given a complete and well-defined form, enabling the intelligent +engineer to comprehend the operation of the machine, +to perceive the conditions of efficiency, and to look +forward in a well-settled direction for further advances in +its improvement and in the increase of its efficiency.</p> + +<p>A very concise <i>résumé</i> of the principal facts and laws +bearing upon the philosophy of the steam-engine will form +a fitting conclusion to this historical sketch.</p> + +<p>The term “energy” was first used by Dr. Young as the +equivalent of the work of a moving body, in his hardly yet +obsolete “Lectures on Natural Philosophy.”</p> + +<p>Energy is the capacity of a moving body to overcome +resistance offered to its motion; it is measured either by +the product of the mean resistance into the space through +which it is overcome, or by the half-product of the mass of +the body into the square of its velocity. Kinetic energy is +the actual energy of a moving body; potential energy is<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_452" id="Page_452">[452]</a></span> +the measure of the work which a body is capable of doing +under certain conditions which, without expending energy, +may be made to affect it, as by the breaking of a cord by +which a weight is suspended, or by firing a mass of explosive +material. The British measure of energy is the foot-pound; +the metric measure is the kilogrammetre.</p> + +<p>Energy, whether kinetic or potential, may be observable +and due to mass-motion; or it may be invisible and due to +molecular movements. The energy of a heavenly body or +of a cannon-shot, and that of heat or of electrical action, are +illustrations of the two classes. In Nature we find utilizable +potential energy in fuel, in food, in any available head of +water, and in available chemical affinities. We find kinetic +energy in the motion of the winds and the flow of running +water, in the heat-motion of the sun’s rays, in heat-currents +on the earth, and in many intermittent movements of bodies +acted on by applied forces, natural or artificial. The potential +energy of fuel and of food has already been seen to +have been derived, at an earlier period, from the kinetic +energy of the sun’s rays, the fuel or the food being thus +made a storehouse or reservoir of energy. It is also seen +that the animal system is simply a “mechanism of transmission” +for energy, and does not create but simply diverts +it to any desired direction of application.</p> + +<p>All the available forms of energy can be readily traced +back to a common origin in the potential energy of a universe +of nebulous substance (chaos), consisting of infinitely +diffused matter of immeasurably slight density, whose “energy +of position” had been, since the creation, gradually +going through a process of transformation into the several +forms of kinetic and potential energy above specified, +through intermediate methods of action which are usually +still in operation, such as the potential energy of chemical +affinity, and the kinetic forms of energy seen in solar radiation, +the rotation of the earth, and the heat of its interior.</p> + +<p>The <i>measure</i> of any given quantity of energy, whatever<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_453" id="Page_453">[453]</a></span> +may be its form, is the product of the resistance which it +is capable of overcoming into the space through which it +can move against that resistance, i. e., by the product RS. +Or it is measured by the equivalent expressions <span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span>MV<span class="enum">2</span>, or +WV<span class="enum">2</span>/2<i>g</i>, in which W is the weight, M is the “mass” of matter +in motion, V the velocity, and <i>g</i> the dynamic measure +of the force of gravity, 32<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">6</span> feet, or 9.8 metres, per second.</p> + +<p>There are three great laws of energetics:</p> + +<p>1. The sum total of the energy of the universe is invariable.</p> + +<p>2. The several forms of energy are interconvertible, +and possess an exact quantitative equivalence.</p> + +<p>3. The tendency of all forms of kinetic energy is continually +toward reduction to forms of molecular motion, +and to their final dissipation uniformly throughout space.</p> + +<p>The history of the first two of these laws has already +been traced. The latter was first enunciated by Prof. Sir +William Thomson in 1853. Undissipated energy is called +“Entrophy.”</p> + +<p>The science of thermo-dynamics is, as has been stated, a +branch of the science of energetics, and is the only branch +of that science in the domain of the physicist which has +been very much studied. This branch of science, which is +restricted to the consideration of the relations of heat-energy +to mechanical energy, is based upon the great fact +determined by Rumford and Joule, and considers the behavior +of those fluids which are used in heat-engines as the +media through which energy is transferred from the one +form to the other. As now accepted, it assumes the correctness +of the hypothesis of the dynamic theory of fluids, +which supposes their expansive force to be due to the motion +of their molecules.</p> + +<p>This idea is as old as Lucretius, and was distinctly expressed +by Bernouilli, Le Sage and Prévost, and Herapath. +Joule recalled attention to this idea, in 1848, as explaining<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_454" id="Page_454">[454]</a></span> +the pressure of gases by the impact of their molecules upon +the sides of the containing vessels. Helmholtz, ten years +later, beautifully developed the mathematics of media composed +of moving, frictionless particles, and Clausius has +carried on the work still further.</p> + +<p>The general conception of a gas, as held to-day, including +the vortex-atom theory of Thomson and Rankine, +supposes all bodies to consist of small particles called molecules, +each of which is a chemical aggregation of its ultimate +parts or atoms. These molecules are in a state of +continual agitation, which is known as heat-motion. The +higher the temperature, the more violent this agitation; +the total quantity of motion is measured as <i>vis viva</i> by the +half-product of the mass into the square of the velocity of +molecular movement, or in heat-units by the same product +divided by Joule’s equivalent. In solids, the range of motion +is circumscribed, and change of form cannot take place. +In fluids, the motion of the molecules has become sufficiently +violent to enable them to break out of this range, +and their motion is then no longer definitely restricted.</p> + +<p>The laws of thermo-dynamics are, according to Rankine:</p> + +<p>1. Heat-energy and mechanical energy are mutually +convertible, one British thermal unit being the equivalent +in heat-energy of 772 foot-pounds of mechanical energy, +and one metric <i>calorie</i> equal to 423.55 kilogrammetres of +work.</p> + +<p>2. The energy due to the heat of each of the several +equal parts into which a uniformly hot substance may be +divided is the same; and the total heat-energy of the mass +is equal to the sum of the energies of its parts.<a name="FNanchor_113_113" +id="FNanchor_113_113"></a><a href="#Footnote_113_113" class="fnanchor">[113]</a></p> + +<p>It follows that the work performed by the transformation +of the energy of heat, during any indefinitely small<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_455" id="Page_455">[455]</a></span> +variation of the state of a substance as respects temperature, +is measured by the product of the absolute temperature +into the variation of a “function,” which function is +the rate of variation of the work so done with temperature. +This function is the quantity called by Rankine the “heat-potential” +of the substance for the given kind of work. A +similar function, which comprehends the total heat-variation, +including both heat transformed and heat needed to +effect accompanying physical changes, is called the “thermo-dynamic +function.” Rankine’s expression for the general +equation of thermo-dynamics includes the latter, and is +given by him as follows:</p> + +<p class="ind10">J<i>dh</i> = <i>d</i>H = <i>kdτ</i> + <i>τd</i>F = <i>τdφ</i>,</p> + +<p>in which J is Joule’s equivalent, <i>dh</i> the variation of total +heat in the substance, <i>kdτ</i> the product of the “dynamic +specific heat” into the variation of temperature, or the total +heat demanded to produce other changes than a transformation +of energy, and <i>τd</i>F is the work done by the transformation +of heat-energy, or the product of the absolute +temperature, <i>τ</i>, into the differential of the heat-potential. +<i>φ</i> is the thermo-dynamic function, and <i>τdφ</i> measures the +whole heat needed to produce, simultaneously, a certain +amount of work or of mechanical energy, and, at the same +time, to change the temperature of the working substance.</p> + +<p>Studying the behavior of gases and vapors, it is found +that the work done when they are used, like steam, in heat-engines, +consists of three parts:</p> + +<p>(<i>a.</i>) The change effected in the total actual heat-motion +of the fluid.</p> + +<p>(<i>b.</i>) That heat which is expended in the production of +internal work.</p> + +<p>(<i>c.</i>) That heat which is expended in doing the external +work of expansion.</p> + +<p>In any case in which the total heat expended exceeds +that due the production of work on external bodies, the excess<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_456" id="Page_456">[456]</a></span> +so supplied is so much added to the intrinsic energy of +the substance absorbing it.</p> + +<p>The application of these laws to the working of steam +in the engine is a comparatively recent step in the philosophy +of the steam-engine, and we are indebted to Rankine +for the first, and as yet only, extended and in any respect +complete treatise embodying these now accepted principles.</p> + +<p>It was fifteen years after the publication of the first +logical theory of the steam-engine, by Pambour,<a name="FNanchor_114_114" id="FNanchor_114_114"></a><a +href="#Footnote_114_114" class="fnanchor">[114]</a> before +Rankine, in 1859, issued the most valuable of all his works, +“The Steam-Engine and other Prime Movers.” The work +is far too abstruse for the general reader, and is even difficult +reading for many accomplished engineers. It is excellent +beyond praise, however, as a treatise on the thermo-dynamics +of heat-engines. It will be for his successors the +work of years to extend the application of the laws which +he has worked out, and to place the results of his labors +before students in a readily comprehended form.</p> + +<p>William J. Macquorn Rankine, the Scotch engineer and +philosopher, will always be remembered as the author of +the modern philosophy of the steam-engine, and as the +greatest among the founders of the science of thermo-dynamics. +His death, while still occupying the chair of engineering +at the University of Glasgow, December 24, 1872, +at the early age of fifty-two, was one of the greatest losses +to science and to the profession which have occurred during +the century.</p> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_103_103" id="Footnote_103_103"></a><a href="#FNanchor_103_103"><span class="label">[103]</span></a> Their estimate of the length of the Saros, or cycle of eclipses—over 19 +years—was “within 19<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> minutes +of the truth.”—<span class="smcap">Draper.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_104_104" id="Footnote_104_104"></a><a href="#FNanchor_104_104"><span class="label">[104]</span></a> “History of Civilization in England,” +vol. i., p. 208. London, 1868.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_105_105" id="Footnote_105_105"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_105_105"><span class="label">[105]</span></a> “Philosophical Transactions,” 1798.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_106_106" id="Footnote_106_106"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_106_106"><span class="label">[106]</span></a> This idea was not by any means original with Rumford. Bacon seems +to have had the same idea; and Locke says, explicitly enough: “Heat is a +very brisk agitation of the insensible parts of the object ... so that +what in our sensation is heat, in the object is nothing but motion.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_107_107" id="Footnote_107_107"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_107_107"><span class="label">[107]</span></a> The British heat-unit is the quantity of heat required to heat one +pound of water 1° Fahr. from the temperature of maximum density.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_108_108" id="Footnote_108_108"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_108_108"><span class="label">[108]</span></a> Rankine +gives 25,920 foot-pounds per minute—or 432 per second—for +the average draught-horse in Great Britain, which is probably too high +for Bavaria. The engineer’s “horse-power”—33,000 foot-pounds per +minute—is far in excess of the average power of even a good draught-horse, +which latter is sometimes taken as two-thirds the former.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_109_109" id="Footnote_109_109"></a><a href="#FNanchor_109_109"><span +class="label">[109]</span></a> <i>Vide</i> Tait’s admirable “Sketch of Thermodynamics,” second edition, +Edinburgh, 1877.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_110_110" id="Footnote_110_110"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_110_110"><span class="label">[110]</span></a> “New Experiments, Physico-Mechanical, etc., touching the Spring of +Air,” 1662.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_111_111" id="Footnote_111_111"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_111_111"><span class="label">[111]</span></a> “De la Nature de l’Air,” 1676.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_112_112" id="Footnote_112_112"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_112_112"><span class="label">[112]</span></a> <i>See</i> Porter on the Steam-Engine +Indicator for the best set of Regnault’s +tables generally accessible.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_113_113" id="Footnote_113_113"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_113_113"><span class="label">[113]</span></a> This uniformity is not seen where a substance is changing its physical +state while developing its heat-energy, as occurs with steam doing work +while expanding.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_114_114" id="Footnote_114_114"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_114_114"><span class="label">[114]</span></a> “Théorie de la Machine à +Vapeur,” par le Chevalier F. M. G. de Pambour, Paris, 1844.</p></div> + +<hr class="c40" /><p class='pagenum'><a name="Page_457" id="Page_457">[457]</a></p> +<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VIII" id="CHAPTER_VIII"></a>CHAPTER VIII.</h2> +<h3><i>THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE STEAM-ENGINE.</i></h3> + +<hr class="c05" /> +<h4><span class="smcap">Its Application; its Teachings respecting the Construction of the Engine and its Improvement.</span></h4> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Oftentimes an Uncertaintie hindered our going on so merrily, but by +persevering the Difficultie was mastered, and the new Triumph gave +stronger Heart unto us.”—<span class="smcap">Raleigh.</span></p></div> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“If everything which we cannot comprehend is to be called an impossibility, +how many are daily presented to our eyes! and in contemning as +false that which we consider to be impossible, may we not be depreciating +a giant’s effort to give an importance to our own weakness?”—<span class="smcap">Montaigne.</span></p></div> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“They who aim vigorously at perfection will come nearer to it than +those whose laziness or despondency makes them give up its pursuit from +the feeling of its being unattainable.”—<span class="smcap">Chesterfield.</span></p></div> +<hr class="c05" /> + +<p>As has been already stated, the steam-engine is a machine +which is especially designed to transform energy, +originally dormant or potential, into active and usefully +available kinetic energy.</p> + +<p>When, millions of years ago, in that early period which +the geologists call the carboniferous, the kinetic energy of +the sun’s rays, and of the glowing interior of the earth, +was expended in the decomposition of the vast volumes of +carbonic acid with which air was then charged, and in the +production of a life-sustaining atmosphere and of the immense +forests which then covered the earth with their almost<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_458" id="Page_458">[458]</a></span> +inconceivably luxuriant vegetation, there was stored up +for the benefit of the human race, then uncreated, an inconceivably +great treasure of potential energy, which we are +now just beginning to utilize. This potential energy becomes +kinetic and available wherever and whenever the +powerful chemical affinity of oxygen for carbon is permitted +to come into play; and the fossil fuel stored in our coal-beds +or the wood of existing forests is, by the familiar process +of combustion, permitted to return to the state of combination +with oxygen in which it existed in the earliest geological +periods.</p> + +<p>The philosophy of the steam-engine, therefore, traces +the changes which occur from this first step, by which, in +the furnace of the steam-boiler, this potential energy which +exists in the tendency of carbon and oxygen to combine to +form carbonic acid is taken advantage of, and the utilizable +kinetic energy of heat is produced in equivalent amount, +to the final application of resulting mechanical energy to +machinery of transmission, through which it is usefully +applied to the elevation of water, to the driving of mills +and machinery of all kinds, or to the hauling of “lightning” +trains on our railways, or to the propulsion of the +Great Eastern.</p> + +<p>The kinetic heat-energy developed in the furnace of the +steam-boiler is partly transmitted through the metallic +walls which inclose the steam and water within the boiler, +there to evaporate water, and to assume that form of energy +which exists in steam confined under pressure, and is +partly carried away into the atmosphere in the discharged +gaseous products of combustion, serving, however, a useful +purpose, <i>en route</i>, by producing the draught needed to keep +up combustion.</p> + +<p>The steam, with its store of heat-energy, passes through +tortuous pipes and passages to the steam-cylinder of the +engine, losing more or less heat on the way, and there expands, +driving the piston before it, and losing heat by the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_459" id="Page_459">[459]</a></span> +transformation of that form of energy while doing mechanical +work of equivalent amount. But this steam-cylinder is +made of metal, a material which is one of the best conductors +of heat, and therefore one of the very worst possible +substances with which to inclose anything as subtile and +difficult of control as the heat pervading a condensible +vapor like steam. The process of internal condensation and +reëvaporation, which is the great enemy of economical +working, thus has full play, and is only partly checked by +the heat from the steam-jacket, which, penetrating the cylinder, +assists by keeping up the temperature of the internal +surface and checking the first step, condensation, which is +an essential preliminary to the final waste by reëvaporation. +The piston, too, is of metal, and affords a most excellent +way of exit for the heat escaping to the exhaust side.</p> + +<p>Finally, all unutilized heat rejected from the steam-cylinder +is carried away from the machine, either by the water +of condensation, or, in the non-condensing engine, by the +atmosphere into which it is discharged.</p> + +<p>Having traced the method of operation of the steam-engine, +it is easy to discover what principles are comprehended +in its philosophy, to learn what are known facts +bearing upon its operation, and to determine what are the +directions in which improvement must take place, what are +the limits beyond which improvement cannot possibly be +carried, and, in some directions, to determine what is the +proper course to pursue in effecting improvements. The +general direction of change in the past, as well as at present, +is easily seen, and it may usually be assumed that there +will be no immediate change of direction in a course which +has long been preserved, and which is well defined. We +may, therefore, form an idea of the probable direction in +which to look for improvement in the near future.</p> + +<p>Reviewing the operations which go on in this machine +during the process of transformation of energy which has +been outlined, and studying it more in detail, we may deduce<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_460" id="Page_460">[460]</a></span> +the principles which govern its design and construction, +guide us in its management, and determine its efficiency.</p> + +<p>In the furnace of the boiler, the quantity of heat developed +in available form is proportional to the amount of +fuel burned. It is available in proportion to the temperature +attained by the products of combustion; were this +temperature no higher than that of the boiler, the heat +would all pass off unutilized. But the temperature produced +by a given quantity of heat, measured in heat-units, +is greater as the volume of gas heated is less. It follows +that, at this point, therefore, the fuel should be perfectly +consumed with the least possible air-supply, and the least +possible abstraction of heat before combustion is complete. +High temperature of furnace, also, favors complete combustion. +We hence conclude that, in the steam-boiler furnace, +fuel should be burned completely in a chamber having non-conducting +walls, and with the smallest air-supply compatible +with thorough combustion; and, further, that the air +should be free from moisture, that greatest of all absorbents +of heat, and that the products of combustion should +be removed from the furnace before beginning to drain +their heat into the boiler. A fire-brick furnace, a large +combustion-chamber with thorough intermixture of gases +within it, good fuel, and a restricted and carefully-distributed +supply of air, seem to be the conditions which meet +these requisites best.</p> + +<p>The heat generated by combustion traverses the walls +which separate the gases of the furnace from the steam and +water confined within the boiler, and is then taken up by +those fluids, raising their temperature from that of the entering +“feed-water” to that due the steam-pressure, and +expanding the liquid into steam occupying a greatly-increased +volume, thus doing a certain amount of work, besides +increasing temperature. The extent to which heat +may thus be usefully withdrawn from the furnace-gases +depends upon the conductivity of the metallic wall, the<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_461" id="Page_461">[461]</a></span> +rate at which the water will take heat from the metal, and +the difference of temperature on the two sides of the metal. +Extended “heating-surface,” therefore, a metal of high conducting +power, and a maximum difference of temperature +on the two sides of the separating wall of metal, are the +essential conditions of economy here. The heating-surface +is sometimes made of so great an area that the temperature +of the escaping gases is too low to give good chimney-draught, +and a “mechanical draught” is resorted to, revolving +“fan-blowers” being ordinarily used for its production. +It is most economical to adopt this method. The +steam-boiler is generally constructed of iron—sometimes, +but rarely, of cast-iron, although “steel,” where not hard +enough to harden or temper, is better in consequence of its +greater strength and homogeneousness of structure, and its +better conductivity. The maximum conductivity of flow +of heat for any given material is secured by so designing +the boiler as to secure rapid, steady, and complete circulation +of the water within it. The maximum rapidity of +transfer throughout the whole area of heating-surface is +secured, usually, by taking the feed-water into the boiler +as nearly as possible at the point where the gases are discharged +into the chimney-flue, withdrawing the steam nearer +the point of maximum temperature of flues, and securing +opposite directions of flow for the gases on the one side +and the water on the other. Losses of heat from the boiler, +by conduction and radiation to surrounding bodies, are +checked as far as possible by non-conducting coverings.</p> + +<p>The mechanical equivalent of the heat generated in the +boiler is easily calculated when the conditions of working +are known. A pound of pure carbon has been found to be +capable of liberating by its perfect combustion, resulting in +the formation of carbonic acid, 14,500 British thermal units, +equivalent to 14,500 × 772 = 11,194,000 foot-pounds of work, +and, if burned in one hour, to <span class="enum">11194000</span>∕<span class="denom">1980000</span> = 5.6 horse-power. +In other words, with perfect utilization, but <span class="enum">10</span>∕<span class="denom">56</span> = 0.177, +or<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_462" id="Page_462">[462]</a></span> +about one-sixth, of a pound of carbon would be needed +per hour for each horse-power of work done. But even +good coal is not nearly all carbon, and has but about nine-tenths +this heat-producing power, and it is usually rated as +yielding about 10,000,000 foot-pounds of work per pound. +The evaporative power of pure carbon being rated at 15 +pounds of water, that of good coal may be stated at 13<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span>. +In metric measures, one gramme of good coal should evaporate +about 13<span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span> grammes of water from the boiling-point, +producing the equivalent of about 3,000,000 kilogrammetres +of work from the 7,272 <i>calories</i> of heat thus generated. A +gramme of pure carbon generates in its combustion 8,080 +<i>calories</i> of heat. Per hour and per horse-power, 0.08, or +less than one-twelfth, of a kilogram of carbon burned +per hour evolves heat-energy equal to one horse-power.</p> + +<p>Of the coal burned in a steam-boiler, it rarely happens +that more than three-fourths is utilized in making steam; +7,500,000 foot-pounds (1,036,898 kilogrammetres) is, therefore, +as much energy as is usually sent to the engine per +pound of good coal burned in the steam-boiler. The +“efficiency” of a good steam-boiler is therefore usually +not far from 0.75 as a maximum. Rankine estimates this +quantity for ordinary boilers of good design and with +chimney-draught at</p> + +<table class="ind10" summary="formula_462"> + +<tr> +<td rowspan="2">E = </td> +<td colspan="2" class="center bb">0.92</td> +<td rowspan="2"> ;</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>1 + 0.5</td> +<td><table class="fsize80" style="line-height: .5em;" summary="F/S"><tr> +<td class="bb"> F </td></tr><tr><td class="center">S</td></tr></table></td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>in which <span class="enum">F</span>∕<span class="denom">S</span> is the ratio of weight of fuel burned per square +foot of grate to the ratio of heating to grate surface; this is +a formula of fairly close approximation for general practice.</p> + +<p>The steam in the engine first drives the piston some distance +before the induction or steam valve is closed, and it +then expands, doing work, and condensing in proportion to +work done as the expansion proceeds, until it is finally released +by the opening of the exhaust or eduction valve. +Saturated steam is modified in its action by a process which<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_463" id="Page_463">[463]</a></span> +has already been described, condensing at the beginning +and reëvaporating at the end of the stroke, thus carrying +into the condenser considerable quantities of heat which +should have been utilized in the development of power. +Whether this operation takes place in one cylinder or in +several is only of importance in so far as it modifies the losses +due to conduction and radiation of heat, to condensation +and reëvaporation of steam, and to the friction of the +machine. It has already been seen how these losses are +modified by the substitution of the compound for the single-cylinder +engine.</p> + +<p>The laws of thermo-dynamics teach, as has been stated, +that the proportion of the heat-energy contained in the steam +or other working fluid which may be transformed into +mechanical energy is a fraction <span class="enum">(H<sub>1</sub> - H<sub>2</sub>)</span>∕<span +class="denom">H<sub>1</sub></span>, of the total, in +which H<span class="denom">1</span> and H<span class="denom">2</span> are the quantities of heat contained in the +steam at the beginning and at the end of its operation, +measuring from the absolute zero of heat-motion. In perfect +gases,</p> + +<table class="center ind10" summary="Formula_463"> + +<tr> +<td class="bb"> H<span class="denom">1</span> - H<span class="denom">2</span> </td> +<td rowspan="2"> = </td> +<td class="bb"><span class="fsize125">τ</span><span class="denom">1</span> - <span +class="fsize125">τ</span><span class="denom">2</span></td> +<td rowspan="2"> = </td> +<td class="bb">T<span class="denom">1</span> - T<span class="sub">2</span></td> +<td rowspan="2"> ;</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>H<span class="sub">1</span></td> +<td><span class="fsize125">τ</span><span class="sub">1</span></td> +<td>T<span class="sub">1</span> + 461.2° Fahr.</td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>but in imperfect gases, and especially in vapors which, like +steam, condense, or otherwise change their physical state, +this equality may still exist, <span class="enum">(H<span class="sub">1</span> - H<span class="sub">2</span>)</span>∕<span +class="denom">H<span class="sub">1</span></span> = <span +class="enum">(τ<span class="sub">1</span> - τ<span class="sub">2</span>)</span>∕<span +class="denom">τ<span class="sub">1</span></span>; and the +fluid is equally efficient with the perfect gas as a working +substance in a heat-engine. In any case it is seen that the +efficiency is greatest when the whole of the heat is received +at the maximum and rejected at the minimum attainable +temperatures.</p> + +<p>Assuming this expression strictly accurate, a hot-air +engine working from 413.6° Fahr, or 874.8° absolute temperature, +down to 122° Fahr, or 583.2° absolute, should have +an efficiency of 0.263, transforming that proportion of<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_464" id="Page_464">[464]</a></span> +available heat into mechanical work. The engines of the +steamer Ericsson closely approached this figure, and gave a +horse-power for each 1.87 pound of coal burned per hour.</p> + +<p>Steam expands in the steam-cylinder quite differently +under different circumstances. If no heat is either communicated +to it or abstracted from it, however, it expands in +an hyperbolic curve, losing its tension much more rapidly +than when expanded without doing work, in consequence +both of its change of volume and its condensation. The +algebraic expression for this method of expansion is, according +to Rankine, PV<span class="enum">1.111</span> = C, a constant, or, according to +other authorities, from PV<span class="enum">1.135</span> = C to PV<span class="enum">1.140</span> = C. The +greater the value of the exponent of V, the greater the efficiency +of the fluid between any two temperatures. The +maximum value has been found to be given where the +steam is saturated, but perfectly dry, at the commencement +of its expansion. The loss due to condensation on the +cooled interior surface of the cylinder at the commencement +of the stroke and the subsequent reëvaporation as +expansion progresses is least when the cylinder is kept hot +by its steam-jacket and when least time is given during +the stroke for this transfer of heat between the metal and +the vapor.</p> + +<p>It may be said that, all things considered, therefore, +losses of heat in the steam-cylinder are least when the steam +enters dry, or moderately superheated, where the interior +surfaces are kept hottest by the steam-jacket or by the +hot-air jacket sometimes used, and where piston-speed and +velocity of rotation are highest.<a name="FNanchor_115_115" id="FNanchor_115_115"></a><a +href="#Footnote_115_115" class="fnanchor">[115]</a> The best of compound +engines, using steam of seventy-five pounds pressure and +condensing, usually require about two pounds of coal per +hour—20,000,000 foot-pounds of energy at the furnace—to +develop a horse-power, i. e., about ten times the heat-equivalent<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_465" id="Page_465">[465]</a></span> +of the mechanical work which they accomplish. +Were the steam to expand like the permanent gases, they +would have a theoretical efficiency of about one-quarter; +actually, the efficiency is only one-tenth. The steam-engine, +therefore, utilizes about two-fifths the heat-energy theoretically +available with the best type of engine in general +use. By far the greater part, nearly all, in fact, of the nine-tenths +wasted is rejected in the exhaust steam, and can only +be saved by some such method as is hereafter to be suggested +of retaining that heat and returning it to the boiler.</p> + +<p>The mechanical power which has now been communicated +to the mechanism of the engine by the transfer of the +kinetic energy of the hot steam to the piston is finally usefully +applied to whatever “mechanism of transmission” +forms the connection with the machinery driven by the engine. +In this transfer, there is some loss in the engine itself, +by friction. This is an extremely variable amount, and +it can be made very small by skillful design and good workmanship +and management. It may be taken at one-half +pound per square inch of piston for good engines of 100 +horse-power and upward, but is often several pounds in very +small engines. It is least when the rubbing surfaces are of +different materials, but both of smooth, hard, close-grained +metal, well lubricated, and where advantage is taken of any +arrangement of parts which permits the equilibration of +pressure, as on the shaft-bearings of double and triple engines. +The friction of a steam-engine of large size and +good design is usually between five and seven per cent. of +its total power. It increases rapidly as the size of engine +decreases.</p> + +<p>Having now traced somewhat minutely the growth of +the steam-engine from the beginning of the Christian era to +the present time, having rapidly outlined the equally gradual, +though intermittent, growth of its philosophy, and having +shown how the principles of science find application in the +operation of this wonderful machine, we are now prepared<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_466" id="Page_466">[466]</a></span> +to study the conditions which control the intelligent designer, +and to endeavor to learn what are the lessons taught us +by science and by experience in regard to the essential requisites +of efficient working of steam and economy in the +consumption of fuel. We may even venture to point out +definitely the direction in which improvement is now progressing +as indicated by a study of these requisites, and may +be able to perceive the natural limits to such progress, and +possibly to conjecture what must be the character of that +change of type which only can take the engineer beyond +the limit set to his advance so long as he is confined to the +construction of the present type of engine.</p> + +<p>First, we must consider the question: <i>What is the +problem, stated precisely and in its most general form, that +engineers have been here attempting to solve?</i></p> + +<p>After stating the problem, we will examine the record +with a view to determine what direction the path of improvement +has taken hitherto, to learn what are the conditions +of efficiency which should govern the construction of +the modern steam-engine, and, so far as we may judge the +future by the past, by inference, to ascertain what appears +to be the proper course for the present and for the immediate +future. Still further, we will inquire, what are the +conditions, physical and intellectual, which best aid our +progress in perfecting the steam-engine.</p> + +<p>This most important problem may be stated in its most +general, yet definite, form as follows:</p> + +<p><i>To construct a machine which shall, in the most perfect +manner possible, convert the kinetic energy of heat into +mechanical power, the heat being derived from the combustion +of fuel, and steam being the receiver and the conveyer +of that heat.</i></p> + +<p>The problem, as we have already seen, embodies two +distinct and equally important inquiries:</p> + +<p>The first: What are the scientific principles involved in +the problem as stated?</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_467" id="Page_467">[467]</a></span>The second: How shall a machine be constructed that +shall most efficiently embody, and accord with, not only +those scientific principles, but also all of those principles of +engineering practice that so vitally affect the economical +value of every machine?</p> + +<p>The one question is addressed to the man of science, the +other to the engineer. They can be satisfactorily answered, +even so far as our knowledge at present permits, after studying +with care the scientific principles involved in the theory +of the steam-engine under the best light that science can +afford us, and by a careful study of the various steps of improvement +that have taken place and of accompanying variations +of structure, analyzing the effect of each change, and +tracing the reasons for them.</p> + +<p>The theory of the steam-engine is too important and +too extensive a subject to be satisfactorily treated here in +even the most concise possible manner. I can only attempt +a plain statement of the course which seems to be pointed +out by science as the proper one to pursue in the endeavor +to increase the economical efficiency of steam-engines.</p> + +<p>The teachings of science indicate that <i>success in economically +deriving mechanical power from the energy of heat-motion +will, in all cases, be the greater as we work between +more widely separated limits of temperature, and as we +more perfectly provide against losses by dissipation of heat +in directions in which it is unavailable for the production +of power</i>.</p> + +<p>Scientific research, as we have seen, has proved that, in +all known varieties of heat-engine, a large loss of effect is +unavoidable from the fact that we cannot, in the ordinary +steam-engine, reduce the lower limit of temperature, in +working, below a point which is far above the absolute +zero of temperature—far above that point at which bodies +have no heat-motion. The point corresponding to the mean +temperature of the surface of the earth is above the ordinary +lower limit.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_468" id="Page_468">[468]</a></span>The higher the temperature of the steam when it enters +the steam cylinder, and the lower that which it reaches before +the exhaust occurs, the greater, science tells us, will be +our success, provided we at the same time avoid waste of +heat and power.</p> + +<p>Now, looking back over the history of the steam-engine, +we may briefly note the prominent improvements and the +most striking changes of form, and may thus endeavor to +obtain some idea of the general direction in which we are +to look for further advance.</p> + +<p>Beginning with the machine of Porta, at which point we +may first take up an unbroken thread, it will be remembered +that we there found a single vessel performing the functions +of all the parts of a modern pumping-engine; it was, at +once, boiler, steam-cylinder, and condenser, as well as both +a lifting and a forcing pump.</p> + +<p>The Marquis of Worcester divided the engine into two +parts, using a separate boiler.</p> + +<p>Savery duplicated that part of the engine of Worcester +which performed the several parts of pump, steam-cylinder, +and condenser, and added the use of water to effect rapid +condensation, perfecting, so far as it was ever perfected, the +steam-engine as a simple machine.</p> + +<p>Newcomen and Calley next separated the pump from +the steam-engine proper, producing the modern steam-engine—the +engine as a train of mechanism; and in their engine, +as in Savery’s, we noticed the use of surface condensation +first, and subsequently that of the jet thrown into the +midst of the steam to be condensed.</p> + +<p>Watt finally effected the crowning improvements, and +completed the movement o£ “differentiation” by separating +the condenser from the steam-cylinder. Here this process +of change ceased, the several important operations of the +steam-engine now being conducted each in a separate vessel. +The boiler furnished the steam, the cylinder derived from it +mechanical power, and it was finally condensed in a separate<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_469" id="Page_469">[469]</a></span> +vessel, while the power which had been obtained from it in +the steam-cylinder was transmitted through still other parts, +to the pumps, or wherever work was to be done.</p> + +<p>Watt, also, took the initiative in another direction. He +continually increased the efficiency of the machine by improving +the proportions of its parts and the character of its +workmanship, thus making it possible to render available +many of those improvements in detail upon which effectiveness +is so greatly dependent and which are only useful when +made by a skillful workman.</p> + +<p>Watt and his contemporaries also commenced that movement +toward higher pressures of steam and greater expansion +which has been the most striking feature noticed in the +progress of steam-engineering since his time. Newcomen +used steam of barely more than atmospheric pressure and +raised 105,000 pounds of water one foot high with a pound +of coal consumed. Smeaton raised the pressure somewhat +and increased the duty considerably. Watt started with a +duty double that of Newcomen and raised it to 320,000 +foot-pounds per pound of coal, with steam at 10 pounds +pressure. To-day, Cornish engines of the same general plan +as those of Watt, but worked with 40 to 60 pounds of steam +and expanding three or four times, do a duty probably +averaging, with the better class of engines, 600,000 foot-pounds +per pound of coal. The compound pumping-engine +runs the figure up to above 1,000,000.</p> + +<p>The increase in steam-pressure and in expansion since +Watt’s time has been accompanied by a very great improvement +in workmanship—a consequence, very largely, +of the rapid increase in perfection, and in the wide range +of adaptation of machine-tools—by higher skill and intelligence +in designing engines and boilers, by increased piston-speed, +greater care in obtaining dry steam, and in keeping +it dry until thrown out of the cylinder, either by steam-jacketing +or by superheating, or both combined; it has +further been accompanied by a greater attention to the important<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_470" id="Page_470">[470]</a></span> +matter of providing carefully against losses by +radiation and conduction of heat. We use, finally, the +compound or double-cylinder engine for the purpose of saving +some of the heat usually lost in internal condensation +and reëvaporation, and precipitation of condensed vapor +from great expansion.</p> + +<p>It is evident that, although there is a limit, tolerably +well defined, in the scale of temperature, below which we +cannot expect to pass, a degree gained in approaching this +lower limit is more remunerative than a degree gained in +the range of temperature available by increasing temperatures.<a name="FNanchor_116_116" id="FNanchor_116_116"></a><a +href="#Footnote_116_116" class="fnanchor">[116]</a></p> + +<p>Hence the attempt made by the French inventor, Du +Trembly, about the year 1850, and by other inventors since, +to utilize a larger proportion of heat by approaching more +closely the lower limit, was in accordance with known scientific +principles.</p> + +<p>We may summarize the result of our examination of the +growth of the steam-engine thus:</p> + +<p><i>First.</i> The process of improvement has been one, primarily, +of “differentiation;”<a name="FNanchor_117_117" id="FNanchor_117_117"></a><a +href="#Footnote_117_117" class="fnanchor">[117]</a> the number of parts has been +continually increased; while the work of each part has been +simplified, a separate organ being appropriated to each process +in the cycle of operations.</p> + +<p><i>Secondly.</i> A kind of secondary process of differentiation<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_471" id="Page_471">[471]</a></span> +has, to some extent, followed the completion of the +primary one, in which secondary process one operation is +conducted partly in one and partly in another portion of the +machine. This is illustrated by the two cylinders of the +compound engine and by the duplication noticed in the +binary engine.</p> + +<p><i>Thirdly.</i> The direction of improvement has been marked +by a continual increase of steam-pressure, greater expansion, +provision for obtaining dry steam, high piston-speed, careful +protection against loss of heat by conduction or radiation, +and, in marine engines, by surface condensation.</p> + +<p>The direction which improvement seems now to be taking, +and the proper direction, as indicated by an examination +of the principles of science, as well as by our review of the +steps already taken, would seem to be: working between +the widest attainable limits of temperature.</p> + +<p>Steam must enter the machine at the highest possible +temperature, must be protected from waste, and must retain, +at the moment before exhaust, the least possible amount of +heat. He whose inventive genius, or mechanical skill, contributes +to effect either the use of higher steam with safety +and without waste, or the reduction of the temperature of +discharge, confers a boon upon mankind.</p> + +<p>In detail: In the engine, the tendency is, and may probably +be expected to continue, in the near future at least, +toward higher steam-pressure, greater expansion in more +than one cylinder, steam-jacketing, superheating, a careful +use of non-conducting protectors against waste, and the +adoption of still higher piston-speeds.</p> + +<p>In the boiler: more complete combustion without excess +of air passing through the furnace, and more thorough absorption +of heat from the furnace-gases. The latter will +probably be ultimately effected by the use of a mechanically +produced draught, in place of the far more wasteful +method of obtaining it by the expenditure of heat in the +chimney.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_472" id="Page_472">[472]</a></span>In construction we may anticipate the use of better materials, +and more careful workmanship, especially in the +boiler, and much improvement in forms and proportions of +details.</p> + +<p>In management, there is a wide field for improvement, +which improvement we may feel assured will rapidly take +place, as it has now become well understood that great care, +skill, and intelligence are important essentials to the economical +management of the steam-engine, and that they +repay, liberally, all of the expense in time and money that +is requisite to secure them.</p> + +<p>In attempting improvements in the directions indicated, +it would be the height of folly to assume that we have +reached a limit in any one of them, or even that we have +approached a limit. If further progress seems checked by +inadequate returns for efforts made, in any case, to advance +beyond present practice, it becomes the duty of the +engineer to detect the cause of such hinderance, and, having +found it, to remove it.</p> + +<p>A few years ago, the movement toward the expansive +working of high steam was checked by experiments seeming +to prove positive disadvantage to follow advance beyond +a certain point. A careful revision of results, however, +showed that this was true only with engines built, as +was then common, in utter disregard of all the principles +involved in such a use of steam, and of the precautions +necessary to be taken to insure the gain which science +taught us should follow. The hinderances are mechanical, +and it is for the engineer to remove them.</p> + +<p>The last remark is especially applicable to the work of +the engineer who is attempting to advance in the direction +in which, as already intimated, an unmistakable revolution +is now progressing, the modification of the modern steam-engine +to adapt it safely and successfully to run at the +high piston-speed, and great velocity of rotation which have +been already attained and which must undoubtedly be<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_473" id="Page_473">[473]</a></span> +greatly exceeded in the future. As there is no known and +definite limit to the economical increase of speed, and as +the limit set by practical conditions is continually being set +farther back as the builder acquires greater skill and attains +greater accuracy of workmanship and the power to +insure greater rigidity of parts and durability of wearing +surfaces, we must anticipate a continued and indefinite +progress in this direction—a progress which must evidently +be of advantage, whatever may be the direction that other +changes may take.</p> + +<p>It is evident that this adaptation of the steam-engine to +great speed of piston is the work now to be done by the +engineer. The requisites to success are obvious, and may be +concisely stated as follows:</p> + +<p>1. Extreme accuracy in proportions.</p> + +<p>2. Perfect accuracy in fitting parts to each other.</p> + +<p>3. Absolute symmetry of journals.</p> + +<p>4. Ample area and maximum durability of rubbing surfaces.</p> + +<p>5. Perfect certainty of an ample and continuous lubrication.</p> + +<p>6. A nicely calculated and adjusted balance of reciprocating +parts.</p> + +<p>7. Security against injury by shock, whether due to the +presence of water in the cylinder or to looseness of running +parts.</p> + +<p>8. A “positive-motion” cut-off gear.</p> + +<p>9. A powerful but sensitive and accurately-working +governor determining the degree of expansion.<a name="FNanchor_118_118" id="FNanchor_118_118"></a><a +href="#Footnote_118_118" class="fnanchor">[118]</a></p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_474" id="Page_474">[474]</a></span>10. Well-balanced valves and an easy-working valve-gear.</p> + +<p>11. Small volume of “dead-space,” or “clearance,” and +properly adjusted “compression.”</p> + +<p>It would seem sufficiently evident that the engine with +detachable (“drop”) cut-off valve-gear must, sooner or later, +become an obsolete type, although the substitution of springs +or of steam-pressure for gravity in the closing of the detached +valve may defer greatly this apparently inevitable +change. The “engine of the future” will not probably be +a “drop cut-off engine.”</p> + +<p>As regards the construction of the engine as a piece of +mechanism, the principles and practice of good engineering +are precisely the same, whether applied in the designing of +the compound or of the ordinary type of steam-engine. +The proportioning of the two machines to each other in +such manner as to form an effective whole, by procuring +approximately equal amounts of work from both, is the +only essential peculiarity of compound-engine design which +calls for especial care, and the method of securing success +in practice may be stated to be, for both forms of engines, +as follows:</p> + +<p>1. A good design, by which is meant—</p> + +<p><i>a.</i> Correct proportions, both in general dimensions and +in arrangement of parts, and proper forms and sizes of details +to withstand safely the forces which may be expected +to come upon them.</p> + +<p><i>b.</i> A general plan which embodies the recognized practice +of good engineering.</p> + +<p><i>c.</i> Adaptation to the specific work which it is intended +to perform, in size and in efficiency. It sometimes happens +that good practice dictates the use of a comparatively uneconomical +design.</p> + +<p>2. Good construction, by which is meant—</p> + +<p><i>a.</i> The use of good material.</p> + +<p><i>b.</i> Accurate workmanship.</p> + +<p><i>c.</i> Skillful fitting and a proper “assemblage” of parts.</p> + +<p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_475" id="Page_475">[475]</a></span>3. Proper connection with its work, that it may do that +work under the conditions assumed in its design.</p> + +<p>4. Skillful management by those in whose hands it is +placed.</p> + +<p><i>In general</i>, it may be stated that, to secure maximum +economical efficiency, steam should be worked at as high a +pressure as possible, and the expansion should be fixed as +nearly as possible at the point of maximum economy for +that pressure. In general, the number of times which the +volume of steam may be expanded in the standard single-cylinder, +high-pressure engine with maximum economy, is +not far from <span class="enum">1</span>∕<span class="denom">2</span>√<span class="bt">P</span>, +where P is the pressure in pounds per +square inch; it rarely exceeds 0.75√<span class="bt">P</span>. This may be exceeded +in double-cylinder engines. It is even more disadvantageous +to cut off too short than to “‘follow’ too far.” +With considerable expansion, steam-jacketing and moderate +superheating should be adopted, to prevent excessive +losses by internal condensation and reëvaporation; and +expansion should take place in double cylinders, to avoid +excessive weight of parts, irregularity of motion, and great +loss by friction.</p> + +<p>To secure this vitally important economy, it is advisable +to seek some practicable method of lining the cylinder with +a non-conducting material. This plan, as has been seen, +was adopted by Smeaton, in constructing Newcomen engines +a century ago. Smeaton used wood on his pistons, +and Watt tried wood as a material for steam-cylinder linings. +That material is too perishable at temperatures now +common, and no metal has yet been substituted, or even +discovered, which answers the same purpose. The loss will +also be reduced by increasing the speed of rotation and velocity +of piston. Where no effectual means can be found +of preventing contact of the steam with a good absorbent +and conductor of heat, it will be found best to sacrifice +some of the efficiency due to the change of state of the +vapor, by superheating it and sending it into the cylinder<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_476" id="Page_476">[476]</a></span> +at a temperature considerably exceeding that of saturation. +With low steam and slowly-moving pistons, it is better to +pursue the latter course than to attempt to increase the efficiency +of the engine by greater expansion.</p> + +<p>External surfaces should be carefully covered by non-conductors +and non-radiators, to prevent losses by conduction +and radiation of heat. It is especially necessary to +reduce back-pressure and to obtain the most perfect vacuum +possible without overloading the air-pump, if it is desired +to obtain the maximum efficiency by expansion, and it then +becomes also very necessary to reduce losses by “dead-spaces” +and by badly-adjusted valves.</p> + +<p>The piston-speed should be as great as can be sustained +with safety.</p> + +<p>Good engines should not require more than W = <span class="enum">200</span>∕<span +class="denom">√<span class="bt">P</span></span> +where W = the weight of steam per hour and per horse-power; +the best practice gives about W = <span class="enum">180</span>∕<span +class="denom">√<span class="bt">P</span></span> in large engines +with dry steam, high piston-speed, and good design, +construction, and management.</p> + +<p>The expansion-valve gear should be simple. The point +of cut-off is perhaps best determined by the governor. The +valve should close rapidly, but without shock, and should +be balanced, or some other device should be adopted to +make it easy to move and free from liability to cutting or +rapid wear.</p> + +<p>The governor should act promptly and powerfully, and +should be free from liability to oscillate, and to thus introduce +irregularities which are sometimes not less serious than +those which the instrument is intended to prevent.</p> + +<p>Friction should be reduced as much as possible, and careful +provision should be made to economize lubricants as +well as fuel.</p> + +<p>The Principles of Steam-Boiler Construction are exceedingly +simple; and although attempts are almost daily made<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_477" id="Page_477">[477]</a></span> +to obtain improved results by varying the design and arrangement +of heating-surface, the best boilers of nearly all +makers of acknowledged standing are practically equal in +merit, although of very diverse forms.</p> + +<p>In making boilers, the effort of the engineer should +evidently be:</p> + +<p>1. To secure complete combustion of the fuel without +permitting dilution of the products of combustion by excess +of air.</p> + +<p>2. To secure as high temperature of furnace as possible.</p> + +<p>3. To so arrange heating-surfaces that, without checking +draught, the available heat shall be most completely +taken up and utilized.</p> + +<p>4. To make the form of boiler such that it shall be +constructed without mechanical difficulty or excessive expense.</p> + +<p>5. To give it such form that it shall be durable, under +the action of the hot gases and of the corroding elements +of the atmosphere.</p> + +<p>6. To make every part accessible for cleaning and repairs.</p> + +<p>7. To make every part as nearly as possible uniform in +strength, and in liability to loss of strength by wear and +tear, so that the boiler when old shall not be rendered useless +by local defects.</p> + +<p>8. To adopt a reasonably high “factor of safety” in +proportioning parts.</p> + +<p>9. To provide efficient safety-valves, steam-gauges, and +other appurtenances.</p> + +<p>10. To secure intelligent and very careful management.</p> + +<p>In securing complete combustion, the first of these desiderata, +an ample supply of air and its thorough intermixture +with the combustible elements of the fuel are essential; +for the second—high temperature of furnace—it is necessary +that the air-supply shall not be in excess of that absolutely<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_478" id="Page_478">[478]</a></span> +needed to give complete combustion. The efficiency of a +furnace in making heat available is measured by</p> + +<table class="center ind10" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" summary="Formula_478"> + +<tr> +<td rowspan="2">E = </td> +<td class="center bb">T - T′</td> +<td rowspan="2"> ;</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>T - <i>t</i></td> +</tr> + +</table> + +<p>in which E represents the ratio of heat utilized to the whole +calorific value of the fuel, T is the furnace-temperature, +T′ the temperature of the chimney, and <i>t</i> that of the external +air. The higher the furnace-temperature and the lower +that of the chimney, the greater the proportion of heat +available. It is further evident that, however perfect the +combustion, no heat can be utilized if either the temperature +of the chimney approximates to that of the furnace, or +if the temperature of the furnace is reduced by dilution +approximately to that of the boiler. Concentration of +heat in the furnace is secured, in some cases, by special +expedients, as by heating the entering air, or as in the Siemens +gas-furnace, heating both the combustible gases and +the supporter of combustion. Detached fire-brick furnaces +have an advantage over the “fire-boxes” of steam-boilers +in their higher temperature; surrounding the fire with non-conducting +and highly heated surfaces is an effective method +of securing high furnace-temperature.</p> + +<p>In arranging heating-surface, the effort should be to impede +the draught as little as possible, and so to place them +that the circulation of water within the boiler should be +free and rapid at every part reached by the hot gases. The +directions of circulation of water on the one side and of gas +on the other side of the sheet should, whenever possible, be opposite. +The cold water should enter where the cooled gases +leave, and the steam should be taken off farthest from that +point. The temperature of chimney-gases has thus been +reduced in practice to less than 300° Fahr., and an efficiency +equal to 0.75 to 0.80 the theoretical has been attained.</p> + +<p>The extent of heating-surface simply, in all of the best +forms of boiler, determines the efficiency, and in them the +disposition of that surface seldom affects it to any great<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_479" id="Page_479">[479]</a></span> +extent. The area of heating-surface may also be varied +within very wide limits without very greatly modifying +efficiency. A ratio of 25 to 1 in flue and 30 to 1 in tubular +boilers represents the relative area of heating and grate +surfaces as chosen in the practice of the best-known builders.</p> + +<p>The material of the boiler should be tough and ductile +iron, or, better, a soft steel containing only sufficient carbon +to insure melting in the crucible or on the hearth of the +melting-furnace, and so little that no danger may exist of +hardening and cracking under the action of sudden and +great changes of temperature.</p> + +<p>Where iron is used, it is necessary to select a somewhat +hard, but homogeneous and tough, quality for the fire-box +sheets or any part exposed to flames.</p> + +<p>The factor of safety is invariably too low in this country, +and is never too high in Europe. Foreign builders are +more careful in this matter than our makers in the United +States. The boiler should be built strong enough to bear a +pressure at least six times the proposed working-pressure; +as the boiler grows weak with age, it should be occasionally +tested to a pressure far above the working-pressure, which +latter should be reduced gradually to keep within the bounds +of safety. In the United States, the factor of safety is +seldom more than four in the new boilers, frequently much +less, and even this is reduced practically to one and a third +by the operation of our inspection-laws.</p> + +<p>The principles just enunciated are those generally, perhaps +universally, accepted principles which are stated in all +text-books of science and of steam-engineering, and are accepted +by both engineers and men of science.</p> + +<p>These principles are correct, and the deductions which +have been here formulated are rigidly exact, as applied to +all types of heat-engine in use; and they lead us to the determination, +in all cases, of the “modulus” of efficiency of +the engine, i. e., to the calculation of the ratio of its actual +efficiency to that efficiency which it would have, were it<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_480" id="Page_480">[480]</a></span> +absolutely free from loss of heat by conduction or radiation, +or other method of loss of heat or waste of power, by friction +of parts or by shock.</p> + +<p>The best modern marine compound engines sometimes, +as we have seen, consume as little as two pounds of coal per +horse-power and per hour; but this is but about one-tenth +the power derivable from the fuel, were all its heat thoroughly +utilized. This loss may be divided thus: 70 per +cent. rejected in exhausted steam; 20 per cent. lost by conduction +and radiation and by faults of mechanism and design; +and only the 10 per cent. remaining is utilized. Thirty +per cent. of the heat generated in the furnace is usually lost +in the chimney, and of the remainder, which enters the engine, +20 per cent. at most is all which we can hope to save +any portion of by improvements effected in our best existing +type of steam-engine. It has already been shown how +the engineer can best proceed in attempting this economy.</p> + +<p>The direction in which further improvement must take +place in the standard type of engine is plainly that which +shall most efficiently check losses by internal condensation +and reëvaporation by the transfer of heat to and from the +metal of the steam-cylinder. The condensation of steam +doing work is evidently not a disadvantage, but, on the contrary, +a decided advantage.</p> + +<p>A new type of engine can, if at all, probably only +supersede the common form when engineers can employ +steam of very high pressure, and adopt much greater range +of expansion than is now usual. Great velocity of piston +and high speed of rotation are also essential in the attempt to +make any revolution in steam-engine construction a success.</p> + +<p>When a new form of steam-engine is likely to be introduced, +if at all, can be scarcely even conjectured. It +seems evident that its success is to be secured, if a revolution +is ever to occur, by the adoption of high steam-pressures, +of great piston speeds, by care and skill in design, +by the use of exceptionally excellent materials of construction,<span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_481" id="Page_481">[481]</a></span> +by great perfection of workmanship, and by intelligence +in its management.</p> + +<p>Experiment and experience will probably lead gradually +to the general and safe employment of much higher steam-pressures +and very greatly increased piston-speeds, and may +ultimately reveal and remove all those difficulties which +must invariably be expected to be met here, as in all other +attempts to effect radical changes, however important they +may be.</p> + +<hr class="l05" /> +<div class="colleft"> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_115_115" id="Footnote_115_115"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_115_115"><span class="label">[115]</span></a> In some cases, as in the Allen engine, the speed of piston has become +very high, approaching 800 <sup>3</sup>√<span class="bt">stroke</span>.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_116_116" id="Footnote_116_116"></a><a href="#FNanchor_116_116"><span +class="label">[116]</span></a> The fact here referred to is easily seen if it is supposed that an engine +is supplied with steam at a temperature of 400° above absolute zero +and works it, without waste, down to a temperature of 200°. Suppose one +inventor to adapt the engine to the use of steam of a range from 500° +down to 200°, while another works his engine, with equally effective provision +against losses, between the limits of 400° and 100°, an equal range +with a lower mean. The first case gives an efficiency of one-half, the +second three-fifths, and the third three-fourths, the last giving the highest +effect.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_117_117" id="Footnote_117_117"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_117_117"><span class="label">[117]</span></a> This term, though perhaps not familiar to engineers, expresses the idea +perfectly.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p class="left"><a name="Footnote_118_118" id="Footnote_118_118"></a><a +href="#FNanchor_118_118"><span class="label">[118]</span></a> The author is not absolutely confident on the latter point. It may be +found more economical and satisfactory, ultimately, to determine the point +of cut-off by an automatic apparatus adjusting the expansion-gear <i>by reference +to the steam-pressure</i>, regulating the speed by attaching the governor +elsewhere. The author has devised several forms of apparatus of the kind +referred to.</p></div> + +<hr class="l05" /> + +<div class="figcenter"><img src="images/illo508.png" alt="Ornament" width="250" height="300" /></div> + + +<hr class="c40" /> +<div class="ind20 bbox"> +<h2><i>Scientific Publications.</i></h2> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<p><b>THE HUMAN SPECIES.</b> By <span class="smcap">A. De Quatrefages</span>, Professor of Anthropology +in the Museum of Natural History, Paris. 12mo, cloth, $2.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The work treats of the unity, origin, antiquity, and original localization of +the human species, peopling of the globe, acclimatization, primitive man, formation +of the human races, fossil human races, present human races, and the physical +and psychological characters of mankind.</p></div> + + +<p><b>STUDENTS’ TEXT-BOOK OF COLOR; or, MODERN CHROMATICS.</b> +With Applications to Art and Industry. With 130 Original Illustrations, +and Frontispiece in Colors. By <span class="smcap">Ogden N. Rood</span>, Professor of +Physics in Columbia College. 12mo, cloth, $2.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“In this interesting book Professor Rood, who, as a distinguished Professor +of Physics in Columbia College, United States, must be accepted as a competent +authority on the branch of science of which he treats, deals briefly and succinctly +with what may be termed the scientific <i>rationale</i> of his subject. But the chief +value of his work is to be attributed to the fact that he is himself an accomplished +artist as well as an authoritative expounder of science.”—<i>Edinburgh +Review, October, 1879, in an article on “The Philosophy of Color.</i>”</p></div> + + +<p><b>EDUCATION AS A SCIENCE.</b> By <span class="smcap">Alexander Bain, LL. D.</span> 12mo, cloth, +$1.75.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“This work must be pronounced the most remarkable discussion of educational +problems which has been published in our day. We do not hesitate to +bespeak for it the widest circulation and the most earnest attention. It should +be in the hands of every school-teacher and friend of education throughout the +land.”—<i>New York Sun.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>A HISTORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE STEAM-ENGINE.</b> By +<span class="smcap">Robert H. Thurston, A. M., C. E.</span>, Professor of Mechanical Engineering +in the Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, N. J., etc. With 163 +Illustrations, including 15 Portraits. 12mo, cloth, $2.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Professor Thurston almost exhausts his subject; details of mechanism are +followed by interesting biographies of the more important inventors. If, as is +contended, the steam-engine is the most important physical agent in civilizing +the world, its history is a desideratum, and the readers of the present work will +agree that it could have a no more amusing and intelligent historian than our +author.”—<i>Boston Gazette.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>STUDIES IN SPECTRUM ANALYSIS.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. Norman Lockyer, F. R. S.</span>, +Correspondent of the Institute of France, etc. With 60 Illustrations. 12mo, +cloth, $2.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“The study of spectrum analysis is one fraught with a peculiar fascination, +and some of the author’s experiments are exceedingly picturesque in their results. +They are so lucidly described, too, that the reader keeps on, from page +to page, never flagging in interest in the matter before him, nor putting down +the book until the last page is reached.”—<i>New York Evening Express.</i></p></div> + + + +<p><b>GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF MUSCLES AND NERVES.</b> By Dr. <span class="smcap">I. +Rosenthal</span>, Professor of Physiology at the University of Erlangen. With +seventy-five Woodcuts. (“International Scientific Series.”) 12mo, cloth, +$1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“The attempt at a connected account of the general physiology of muscles +and nerves is, as far as I know, the first of its kind. The general data for this +branch of science have been gained only within the past thirty years.”—<i>Extract +from Preface.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>SIGHT</b>: An Exposition of the Principles of Monocular and Binocular Vision +By <span class="smcap">Joseph Le Conte, LL. D.</span>, author of “Elements of Geology”; “Religion +and Science”; and Professor of Geology and Natural History in the +University of California. With numerous Illustrations. 12mo, cloth, $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“It is pleasant to find an American book which can rank with the very best +of foreign works on this subject. Professor Le Conte has long been known as +an original investigator in this department; all that he gives us is treated with +a master-hand.”—<i>The Nation.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>ANIMAL LIFE</b>, as affected by the Natural Conditions of Existence. By +<span class="smcap">Karl Semper</span>, Professor of the University of Würzburg. With 2 Maps +and 106 Woodcuts, and Index. 12mo, cloth, $2.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“This is in many respects one of the most interesting contributions to +zoölogical literature which has appeared for some time.”—<i>Nature.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>THE ATOMIC THEORY.</b> By <span class="smcap">Ad. Wurtz</span>, Membre de l’Institut; Doyen +Honoraire de la Faculté de Médecine; Professeur à la Faculté des Sciences +de Paris. Translated by <span class="smcap">E. Cleminshaw, M. A., F. C. S., F. I. C.</span>, Assistant +Master at Sherborne School. 12mo, cloth, $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“There was need for a book like this, which discusses the atomic theory both +in its historic evolution and in its present form. And perhaps no man of this +age could have been selected so able to perform the task in a masterly way as +the illustrious French chemist, Adolph Wurtz. It is impossible to convey to the +reader, in a notice like this, any adequate idea of the scope, lucid instructiveness, +and scientific interest of Professor Wurtz’s book. The modern problems of +chemistry, which are commonly so obscure from imperfect exposition, are here +made wonderfully clear and attractive.”—<i>The Popular Science Monthly.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>THE CRAYFISH.</b> An Introduction to the Study of Zoölogy. By Professor +<span class="smcap">T. H. Huxley, F. R. S.</span> With 82 Illustrations. 12mo, cloth, $1.75.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Whoever will follow these pages, crayfish in hand, and will try to verify for +himself the statements which they contain, will find himself brought face to face, +with all the great zoölogical questions which excite so lively an interest at the +present day.”</p> + +<p>“The reader of this valuable monograph will lay it down with a feeling of +wonder at the amount and variety of matter which has been got out of so seemingly +slight and unpretending a subject.”—<i>Saturday Review.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>SUICIDE</b>: An Essay In Comparative Moral Statistics. By <span class="smcap">Henry Morselli</span>, Professor +of Psychological Medicine in Royal University, Turin. 12mo, Cloth, $1.75.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Suicide” is a scientific inquiry, on the basis of the statistical method, into the laws +of suicidal phenomena. Dealing with the subject as a branch of social science, it considers +the increase of suicide in different countries, and the comparison of nations, +races, and periods in its manifestation. The influences of age, sex, constitution, climate, +season, occupation, religion, prevailing ideas, the elements of character, and the +tendencies of civilization, are comprehensively analyzed in their bearing upon the propensity +to self-destruction. Professor Morselli is an eminent European authority on +this subject. It is accompanied by colored maps illustrating pictorially the results of +statistical inquiries.</p></div> + + +<p><b>VOLCANOES: What they Are and what they Teach.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. W. Judd</span>, +Professor of Geology in the Royal School of Mines (London). With Ninety-six +Illustrations. 12mo. Cloth, $2.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“In no field has modern research been more fruitful than in that of which Professor +Judd gives a popular account in the present volume. The great lines of dynamical, +geological, and meteorological inquiry converge upon the grand problem of the interior +constitution of the earth, and the vast influence of subterranean agencies.... His +book is very far from being a mere dry description of volcanoes and their eruptions; it +is rather a presentation of the terrestrial facts and laws with which volcanic phenomena +are associated.”—<i>Popular Science Monthly.</i></p> + +<p>“The volume before us is one of the pleasantest science manuals we have read for +some time.”—<i>Athenæum.</i></p> + +<p>“Mr. Judd’s summary is so full and so concise that it is almost impossible to give +a fair idea in a short review.”—<i>Pall Mall Gazette.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>THE SUN.</b> By <span class="smcap">C. A. Young,</span> Ph. D., LL. D., Professor of Astronomy in the College +of New Jersey. With numerous Illustrations. 12mo. Cloth, $2.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Professor Young is an authority on ‘The Sun,’ and writes from intimate knowledge. +He has studied that great luminary all his life, invented and improved instruments +for observing it, gone to all quarters of the world in search of the best places +and opportunities to watch it, and has contributed important discoveries that have +extended our knowledge of it.</p> + +<p>“It would take a cyclopædia to represent all that has been done toward clearing up +the solar mysteries. Professor Young has summarized the information, and presented +it in a form completely available for general readers. There is no rhetoric in his book; +he trusts the grandeur of his theme to kindle interest and impress the feelings. His +statements are plain, direct, clear, and condensed, though ample enough for his purpose, +and the substance of what is generally wanted will be found accurately given in his +pages.”—<i>Popular Science Monthly.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b><a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17815">ILLUSIONS: A Psychological Study.</a></b> +By <span class="smcap">James Sully</span>, author of “Sensation +and Intuition,” etc. 12mo. Cloth. $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>This volume takes a wide survey of the field of error, embracing in its view not only +the illusions commonly regarded as of the nature of mental aberrations or hallucinations, +but also other illusions arising from that capacity for error which belongs essentially +to rational human nature. The author has endeavored to keep to a strictly scientific +treatment—that is to say, the description and classification of acknowledged errors, +and the exposition of them by a reference to their psychical and physical conditions.</p> + +<p>“This is not a technical work, but one of wide popular interest, in the principles and +results of which every one is concerned. The illusions of perception of the senses and +of dreams are first considered, and then the author passes to the illusions of introspection, +errors of insight, illusions of memory, and illusions of belief. The work is a noteworthy +contribution to the original progress of thought, and may be relied upon as +representing the present state of knowledge on the important subject to which it is +devoted.”—<i>Popular Science Monthly.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>THE BRAIN AND ITS FUNCTIONS.</b> By <span class="smcap">J. Luys</span>, Physician to the +Hospice de la Salpêtrière. With Illustrations. 12mo. Cloth, $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“No living physiologist is better entitled to speak with authority upon the +structure and functions of the brain than Dr. Luys. His studies on the anatomy +of the nervous system are acknowledged to be the fullest and most systematic +ever undertaken. Dr. Luys supports his conclusions not only by his own anatomical +researches, but also by many functional observations of various other +physiologists, including of course Professor Ferrier’s now classical experiments.”—<i>St. +James’s Gazette.</i></p> + +<p>“Dr. Luys, at the head of the great French Insane Asylum, is one of the most +eminent and successful investigators of cerebral science now living; and he has +given unquestionably the clearest and most interesting brief account yet made of +the structure and operations of the brain. We have been fascinated by this volume +more than by any other treatise we have yet seen on the machinery of sensibility +and thought; and we have been instructed not only by much that is new, +but by many sagacious practical hints such as it is well for everybody to understand.”—<i>The +Popular Science Monthly.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>THE CONCEPTS AND THEORIES OF MODERN PHYSICS.</b> By +<span class="smcap">J. B. Stallo.</span> 12mo. Cloth, $1.75.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Judge Stallo’s work is an inquiry into the validity of those mechanical conceptions +of the universe which are now held as fundamental in physical science. +He takes up the leading modern doctrines which are based upon this mechanical +conception, such as the atomic constitution of matter, the kinetic theory of gases, +the conservation of energy, the nebular hypothesis, and other views, to find how +much stands upon solid empirical ground, and how much rests upon metaphysical +speculation. Since the appearance of Dr. Draper’s +‘<a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1185">Religion and Science</a>,’ +no book has been published in the country calculated to make so deep an impression +on thoughtful and educated readers as this volume.... The range and +minuteness of the author’s learning, the acuteness of his reasoning, and the +singular precision and clearness of his style, are qualities which very seldom +have been jointly exhibited in a scientific treatise.”—<i>New York Sun.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b><a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2355">THE FORMATION OF VEGETABLE MOULD, THROUGH THE +ACTION OF WORMS, WITH OBSERVATIONS ON THEIR +HABITS.</a></b> By <span class="smcap">Charles Darwin</span>, LL. D., F. R. S., author of “<a +href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1228">On the +Origin of Species</a>,” etc., etc. With Illustrations. 12mo, cloth. Price, $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Mr. Darwin’s little volume on the habits and instincts of earth-worms is no +less marked than the earlier or more elaborate efforts of his genius by freshness +of observation, unfailing power of interpreting and correlating facts, and logical +vigor in generalizing upon them. The main purpose of the work is to point out +the share which worms have taken in the formation of the layer of vegetable +mould which covers the whole surface of the land in every moderately humid +country. All lovers of nature will unite in thanking Mr. Darwin for the new and +interesting light he has thrown upon a subject so long overlooked, yet so full of +interest and instruction, as the structure and the labors of the earth-worm.”—<i>Saturday +Review.</i></p> + +<p>“Respecting worms as among the most useful portions of animate nature, +Dr. Darwin relates, in this remarkable book, their structure and habits, the part +they have played in the burial of ancient buildings and the denudation of the +land, in the disintegration of rocks, the preparation of soil for the growth of +plants, and in the natural history of the world.”—<i>Boston Advertiser.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>ANTS, BEES, AND WASPS.</b> A Record of Observations on the Habits of the +Social Hymenoptera. By Sir <span class="smcap">John Lubbock</span>, Bart., M. P., F. R. S., etc., author +of “Origin of Civilization, and the Primitive Condition of Man,” etc., etc. With +Colored Plates. 12mo, cloth, $2.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“This volume contains the record of various experiments made with ants, bees, and +wasps during the last ten years, with a view to test their mental condition and powers +of sense. The principal point in which Sir John’s mode of experiment differs from +those of Huber, Forel, McCook, and others, is that he has carefully watched and +marked particular insects, and has had their nests under observation for long periods—one +of his ants’ nests having been under constant inspection ever since 1874. His +observations are made principally upon ants because they show more power and flexibility +of mind; and the value of his studies is that they belong to the department of +original research.”</p> + +<p>“We have no hesitation in saying that the author has presented us with the most +valuable series of observations on a special subject that has ever been produced, charmingly +written, full of logical deductions, and, when we consider his multitudinous engagements, +a remarkable illustration of economy of time. As a contribution to insect +psychology, it will be long before this book finds a parallel.”—<i>London Athenæum.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>DISEASES OF MEMORY</b>: An Essay in the Positive Psychology. By <span class="smcap">Th. +Ribot</span>, author of “Heredity,” etc. Translated from the French by William +Huntington Smith. 12mo, cloth, $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“M. Ribot reduces diseases of memory to law, and his treatise is of extraordinary +interest.”—<i>Philadelphia Press.</i></p> + +<p>“Not merely to scientific, but to all thinking men, this volume will prove +intensely interesting.”—<i>New York Observer.</i></p> + +<p>“M. Ribot has bestowed the most painstaking attention upon his theme, +and numerous examples of the conditions considered greatly increase the value +and interest of the volume.”—<i>Philadelphia North American.</i></p> + +<p>“To the general reader the work is made entertaining by many illustrations +connected with such names as Linnæus, Newton, Sir Walter Scott, Horace Vernet, +Gustave Doré, and many others.”—<i>Harrisburg Telegraph.</i></p> + +<p>“The whole subject is presented with a Frenchman’s vivacity of style.”—<i>Providence +Journal.</i></p> + +<p>“It is not too much to say that in no single work have so many curious +cases been brought together and interpreted in a scientific manner.”—<i>Boston +Evening Traveller.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b><a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17802">MYTH AND SCIENCE.</a></b> +By <span class="smcap">Tito Vignoli.</span> 12mo, cloth, price, $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“His book is ingenious; ... his theory of how science gradually differentiated +from and conquered myth is extremely well wrought out, and is probably in +essentials correct.”—<i>Saturday Review.</i></p> + +<p>“The book is a strong one, and far more interesting to the general reader than its +title would indicate. The learning, the acuteness, the strong reasoning power, and the +scientific spirit of the author, command admiration.”—<i>New York Christian Advocate.</i></p> + +<p>“An attempt made, with much ability and no small measure of success, to trace the +origin and development of the myth. The author has pursued his inquiry with much +patience and ingenuity, and has produced a very readable and luminous treatise.”—<i>Philadelphia +North American.</i></p> + +<p>“It is a curious if not startling contribution both to psychology and to the early +history of man’s development.”—<i>New York World.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>MAN BEFORE METALS.</b> By <span class="smcap">N. Joly</span>, Professor at the Science Faculty +of Toulouse; Correspondent of the Institute. With 148 Illustrations, 12mo. +Cloth, $1.75.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“The discussion of man’s origin and early history, by Professor De Quatrefages, +formed one of the most useful volumes in the ‘International Scientific Series,’ and +the same collection is now further enriched by a popular treatise on paleontology, by +M. N. Joly, Professor in the University of Toulouse. The title of the book, ‘Man +before Metals,’ indicates the limitations of the writer’s theme. His object is to bring +together the numerous proofs, collected by modern research, of the great age of the +human race, and to show us what man was, in respect of customs, industries, and +moral or religious ideas, before the use of metals was known to him.”—<i>New York +Sun.</i></p> + +<p>“An interesting, not to say fascinating volume.”—<i>New York Churchman.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>ANIMAL INTELLIGENCE.</b> By <span class="smcap">George J. Romanes</span>, F. R. S., Zoölogical +Secretary of the Linnæan Society, etc. 12mo. Cloth, $1.75.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“My object in the work as a whole is twofold: First, I have thought it desirable +that there should be something resembling a text-book of the facts of Comparative +Psychology, to which men of science, and also metaphysicians, may turn whenever +they have occasion to acquaint themselves with the particular level of intelligence +to which this or that species of animal attains. My second and much more important +object is that of considering the facts of animal intelligence in their relation to the +theory of descent.”—<i>From the Preface.</i></p> + +<p>“Unless we are greatly mistaken, Mr. Romanes’s work will take its place as one +of the most attractive volumes of the ‘International Scientific Series.’ Some persons +may, indeed, be disposed to say that it is too attractive, that it feeds the popular taste +for the curious and marvelous without supplying any commensurate discipline in +exact scientific reflection; but the author has, we think, fully justified himself in his +modest preface. The result is the appearance of a collection of facts which will be a +real boon to the student of Comparative Psychology for this is the first attempt to +present systematically well-assured observations on the mental life of animals.”—<i>Saturday +Review.</i></p> + +<p>“The author believes himself, not without ample cause, to have completely bridged +the supposed gap between instinct and reason by the authentic proofs here marshaled +of remarkable intelligence in some of the higher animals. It is the seemingly +conclusive evidence of reasoning; powers furnished by the adaptation of means to ends +in cases which can not be explained on the theory of inherited aptitude or habit.”—<i>New +York Sun.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>THE SCIENCE OF POLITICS.</b> By <span class="smcap">Sheldon Amos</span>, M. A., author of “The +Science of Law,” etc. 12mo. Cloth, $1.75.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“To the political student and the practical statesman it ought to be of great value.”—<i>New +York Herald.</i></p> + +<p>“The author traces the subject from Plato and Aristotle in Greece, and Cicero in +Rome, to the modern schools in the English field, not slighting the teachings of the +American Revolution or the lessons of the French Revolution of 1793. Forms of government, +political terms, the relation of law, written and unwritten, to the subject, a +codification from Justinian to Napoleon in France and Field in America, are treated +as parts of the subject in hand. Necessarily the subjects of executive and legislative +authority, police, liquor, and land laws are considered, and the question ever growing +in importance in all countries, the relations of corporations to the state.”—<i>New York +Observer.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF MODERN PHILOSOPHIC +THOUGHT, CRITICALLY AND HISTORICALLY CONSIDERED.</b> +By <span class="smcap">Rudolph Eucken</span>, Ph. D., Professor in Jena. With an +Introduction by <span class="smcap">Noah Porter</span>, President of Yale College. One vol., 12mo, +304 pages. Cloth. Price, $1.75.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>President Porter declares of this work that “there are few books within his +knowledge which are better fitted to aid the student who wishes to acquaint himself +with the course of modern speculation and scientific thinking, and to form +an intelligent estimate of most of the current theories.”</p></div> + + +<p><b>MIND IN THE LOWER ANIMALS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE.</b> +By <span class="smcap">W. Lauder Lindsay, M. D., F. R. S. E.</span>, etc. 2 vols., 8vo. Cloth, $4.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“The author of this work, which, regarded merely as an accumulation of +verified and classified facts, is a unique and precious contribution to the data of +comparative psychology, claims that he entered on his inquiry without any theory +to defend, support, or illustrate. We are bound to say that, while his general +conclusions are boldly and continually avowed, his claim of fairness and caution +is justified by his method of examining particular phenomena; that he seems +willing at all times to renounce any impression or belief which is shown to be +scientifically untenable.”—<i>New York Sun.</i></p> + +<p>“In this work—two volumes of over 500 pages—Dr. Lindsay marshals a proportionately +large number of facts against those philosophers who maintain that +the intelligence of man differs in kind and not simply in degree from that of the +lower animals. It is one purpose of his book to show that the main differences +between man and the lower animals exist rather in their physical than in their +mental structure. In this way of thinking, all animals possess not the semblance +of, but the true substance of mind and will.”—<i>New York World.</i></p> + +<p>“So far as we are aware there has been no treatise upon the subject of animal +intelligence so broad in its foundations, so well considered, or so scientific in its +methods of inquiry, as that which has been prepared by Dr. W. Lauder Lindsay +in two large volumes, the first being devoted to a study of animal mind in health, +and the second to animal mind in disease. We may safely say that his work is, +in some respects, the most important essay of the kind that has yet been undertaken. +His observations have been supplemented by a thorough mastery of the +history and literature of the subject, and hence his conclusions rest upon the +broadest possible foundation of safe induction. There is a good analytical index +to the book, as there ought to be to every work of the kind.”—<i>New York Evening +Post.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>THE ELEMENTARY PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC AGRICULTURE.</b> +By <span class="smcap">N. T. Lupton, LL. D.</span>, Professor of Chemistry in Vanderbilt +University, Nashville, Tenn. 18mo. Cloth. Price, 45 cents.</p> + + +<p><b>A GLOSSARY OF BIOLOGICAL, ANATOMICAL, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL +TERMS.</b> By <span class="smcap">Thomas Dunman</span>. Small 8vo. Cloth. 161 +pages. Price, $1.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“It has been the author’s task to furnish here a small and convenient but very +complete glossary of those terms; and he has done this so well, both in his choice +of terms for definition and in his clear exposition of their etymological and technical +meaning, as to leave nothing to be desired in this direction.”—<i>New York +Evening Post.</i></p></div> + +<hr class="c25" /> +<p class="center"><i>For sale by all booksellers, or any work sent by mail, post-paid, on receipt of price.</i></p> +<hr class="c25" /> +<p class="center fsize150">D. APPLETON & CO., Publishers,</p> +<p class="right"><b>1, 3, & 5 Bond Street, New York.</b></p> +<p> </p> + +<hr class="c40" /> +<h2>SCIENTIFIC LECTURES AND ESSAYS.</h2> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<p><b>Popular Lectures on Scientific Subjects.</b> By <span class="smcap">H. +Helmholtz</span>, Professor of Physics in the University of Berlin. First +Series. Translated by <span class="smcap">E. Atkinson</span>, Ph. D., F. C. S. With an Introduction +by Professor <span class="smcap">Tyndall</span>. With 51 Illustrations. 12mo. +Cloth, $2.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p><i>CONTENTS.</i>—On the Relation of Natural Science to Science in General.—On +Goethe’s Scientific Researches.—On the Physiological Causes of Harmony in +Music—Ice and Glaciers.—Interaction of the Natural Forces.—The Recent Progress +of the Theory of Vision.—The Conservation of Force.—Aim and Progress +of Physical Science.</p></div> + + +<p><b>Popular Lectures on Scientific Subjects.</b> By <span class="smcap">H. +Helmholtz</span>. Second Series. 12mo. Cloth, $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p><i>CONTENTS.</i>—Gustav Magnus.—In Memoriam.—The Origin and Significance +of Geometrical Axioms.—Relation of Optics to Painting.—Origin of the Planetary +System.—On Thought in Medicine.—Academic Freedom in German Universities.</p> + +<p>“Professor Helmholtz’s second series of ‘Popular Lectures on Scientific Subjects’ +forms a volume of singular interest and value. He who anticipates a dry +record of facts or a sequence of immature generalization will find himself happily +mistaken. In style and method these discourses are models of excellence, and, +since they come from a man whose learning and authority are beyond dispute, +they may be accepted as presenting the conclusions of the best thought of the +times in scientific fields.”—<i>Boston Traveler.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>Science and Culture, and other Essays.</b> By Professor +<span class="smcap">T. H. Huxley, F. R. S.</span> 12mo. Cloth, $1.50.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>“Of the essays that have been collected by Professor Huxley in this volume, +the first four deal with some aspect of education. Most of the remainder are expositions +of the results of biological research, and, at the same time, illustrations +of the history of scientific ideas. Some of these are among the most interesting +of Professor Huxley’s contributions to the literature of science.”—<i>London Academy.</i></p> + +<p>“It is refreshing to be brought into converse with one of the most vigorous +and acute thinkers of our time, who has the power of putting his thoughts into +language so clear and forcible.”—<i>London Spectator.</i></p></div> + + +<p><b>Scientific Culture, and other Essays.</b> By <span class="smcap">Josiah +Parsons Cooke</span>, Professor of Chemistry and Mineralogy in Harvard +College. 12mo. Cloth, $1.00.</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>These essays are an outcome of a somewhat large experience in teaching +physical science to college students. Cambridge, Massachusetts, early set the +example of making the student’s own observations in the laboratory or cabinet +the basis of all teaching, either in experimental or natural history science; and +this example has been generally followed. “But in most centers of education,” +writes Professor Cooke, “the old traditions so far survive that the great end of +scientific culture is lost in attempting to conform even laboratory instruction to +the old academic methods of recitations and examinations. To point out this +error, and to claim for science-teaching its appropriate methods, was one object +of writing these essays.”</p></div> + +<hr class="c25" /> +<p class="center"><i>For sale by all booksellers; or sent by mail, post-paid, on receipt of price.</i></p> +<hr class="c25" /> +<p class="center fsize125">New York: D. APPLETON & CO., 1, 3, & 5 Bond Street.</p> + +</div> +<hr class="c40" /> + +<div class="notebox"> +<p class="center"><a name="TNotes" id="TNotes"></a><b>Transcriber's Notes:</b></p> + +<ul> + <li>General remarks: + <ul> + <li>Footnotes have been moved to the end of the chapter.</li> + <li>In-line multiple line formulas have been changed to in-line single-line formulas, when necessary with brackets added.</li> + <li>The Table of Contents has been corrected to conform to the text rather than to the original Table of Contents.</li> + <li>The table on dimensions of farm and road locomotives (page 358) gives the diameter of the boiler shell as <i>30 feet</i>, + which seems unlikely.</li> + <li>The table on operating costs of trains (page 376) gives <i>Other expenses per square mile.</i> This has been changed to + <i>Per mile</i>, the same as the other expenses.</li> + <li><i>Feet</i> are sometimes used as unit of area, both <i>knots</i> and <i>knots per hour</i> as unit of speed.</li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>Changes in text: + <ul> + <li>Minor typographical errors have been corrected.</li> + <li>Reference letters in the text have in several cases been changed to conform to the letters used in the illustrations.</li> + <li>Except when mentioned here, inconsistencies in spelling have not been corrected. Exceptions: + <ul> + <li><i>Desagulier</i> to <i>Desaguliers</i>;</li> + <li><i>Séguin</i> to <i>Seguin</i>;</li> + <li><i>Goldworthy Gurney</i> to <i>Goldsworthy Gurney</i>;</li> + <li><i>Ctesibus</i> to <i>Ctesibius</i>;</li> + <li><i>i.e.</i> to <i>i. e.</i>;</li> + <li><i>Warmetheorie</i> to <i>Wärmetheorie</i>;</li> + <li><i>tour a tour</i> to <i>tour ŕ tour</i>;</li> + <li><i>the beam passes to the condenser</i> to <i>the steam passes to the condenser</i>;</li> + <li><i>éléver</i> to <i>élever</i>.</li> + </ul> + </li> + <li><i>As early as 1743</i> (page 68) moved to new paragraph.</li> + <li><i>A = 6.264035</i> changed to <i>a = 6.264035</i> (page 449).</li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>Illustrations: + <ul> + <li>Illustrations have been moved to the paragraph to which they belong. Page numbers in the List of Illustrations and List of + Portraits refer to the original book.</li> + <li>Illustrations edited to conform to description and references in text: + <ul> + <li>Fig. 8: <i>A, F, G</i> changed to <i>A′, F′, G′</i> (right-hand side of illustration);</li> + <li>Fig. 19: <i>d</i> (boiler) changed to <i>b</i>;</li> + <li>Fig. 21: check-valve <i>e</i> not visible in drawing, <i>l</i> added to illustration;</li> + <li>Fig. 26: <i>s</i> added;</li> + <li>Fig. 30: lower <i>a</i> and <i>r</i> changed to <i>a′</i> and <i>r′</i>;</li> + <li>Fig. 41: <i>q</i> and <i>x</i> added;</li> + <li>Fig. 42: <i>C</i> flipped over;</li> + <li>Fig. 43: right-hand <i>E</i> changed to <i>F</i>;</li> + <li>Fig. 48: renamed items <i>t</i> (tank), <i>f</i> (engine cylinder), <i>u</i> (small engine); items <i>p</i> and + <i>q</i> not visible in drawing;</li> + <li>Fig. 57: <i>f</i> not visible in drawing;</li> + <li>Fig. 66: references <i>P, Q, R, S, T, U, C C, Da, D, M</i>, and <i>Fa</i> not visible in drawing, other references + indicate other parts than explained in text;</li> + <li>Fig. 99: right-hand <i>F</i> changed to <i>E</i>;</li> + <li>Fig. 128: <i>X</i> added.</li> + </ul> + </li> + <li>Where details in the illustrations were not clearly visible in this e-book, a link has been provided to see a larger scale + illustration; these may (depending on your system) take some time to load and display.</li> + </ul> + </li> +</ul> + +</div> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of A History of the Growth of the +Steam-Engine, by Robert H. Thurston + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK STEAM *** + +***** This file should be named 35916-h.htm or 35916-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/5/9/1/35916/ + +Produced by Chris Curnow, Harry Lamé and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo009.png b/35916-h/images/illo009.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b58dc3e --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo009.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo033.png b/35916-h/images/illo033.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..fabe406 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo033.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo034.png b/35916-h/images/illo034.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f05323d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo034.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo035.png b/35916-h/images/illo035.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b16c97c --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo035.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo041.png b/35916-h/images/illo041.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..303d6e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo041.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo042.png b/35916-h/images/illo042.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b7853bd --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo042.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo044.png b/35916-h/images/illo044.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..826d730 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo044.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo047.png b/35916-h/images/illo047.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9bff930 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo047.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo048.png b/35916-h/images/illo048.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..fc843e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo048.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo049a.png b/35916-h/images/illo049a.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c381289 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo049a.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo049b.png b/35916-h/images/illo049b.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..593e332 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo049b.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo053.png b/35916-h/images/illo053.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..78e6926 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo053.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo058.png b/35916-h/images/illo058.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..50f186f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo058.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo061.png b/35916-h/images/illo061.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ba69630 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo061.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo062.png b/35916-h/images/illo062.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5238490 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo062.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo064.png b/35916-h/images/illo064.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0c53d1d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo064.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo069.png b/35916-h/images/illo069.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..bca10f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo069.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo070.png b/35916-h/images/illo070.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..efb56d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo070.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo073.png b/35916-h/images/illo073.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..aadc298 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo073.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo075.png b/35916-h/images/illo075.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..53b13ad --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo075.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo077.png b/35916-h/images/illo077.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..41c1950 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo077.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo080.png b/35916-h/images/illo080.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..89f079d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo080.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo081.png b/35916-h/images/illo081.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4a50720 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo081.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo086.png b/35916-h/images/illo086.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..73dbd61 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo086.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo090.png b/35916-h/images/illo090.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1259e79 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo090.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo092.png b/35916-h/images/illo092.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d66e953 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo092.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo094.png b/35916-h/images/illo094.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6533137 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo094.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo100.png b/35916-h/images/illo100.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e3e9ee6 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo100.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo105.png b/35916-h/images/illo105.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ea3f919 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo105.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo107.png b/35916-h/images/illo107.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..984df45 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo107.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo111.png b/35916-h/images/illo111.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3416c8f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo111.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo116.png b/35916-h/images/illo116.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e83483 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo116.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo121.png b/35916-h/images/illo121.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..499cf3c --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo121.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo125.png b/35916-h/images/illo125.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..420951f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo125.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo131.png b/35916-h/images/illo131.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8d6f465 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo131.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo135.png b/35916-h/images/illo135.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..70b90a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo135.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo142.png b/35916-h/images/illo142.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..728e9ee --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo142.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo144.png b/35916-h/images/illo144.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1e2f302 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo144.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo146.png b/35916-h/images/illo146.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a1412cc --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo146.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo148.png b/35916-h/images/illo148.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5ff7ea5 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo148.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo149.png b/35916-h/images/illo149.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0f08a8b --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo149.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo150.png b/35916-h/images/illo150.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..efbc45d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo150.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo156.png b/35916-h/images/illo156.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..625345e --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo156.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo159.png b/35916-h/images/illo159.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8774cbe --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo159.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo161.png b/35916-h/images/illo161.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..da13bb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo161.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo163.png b/35916-h/images/illo163.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4ce2836 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo163.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo166.png b/35916-h/images/illo166.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..19403ba --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo166.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo168.png b/35916-h/images/illo168.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..627b791 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo168.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo170.png b/35916-h/images/illo170.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..67936d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo170.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo171.png b/35916-h/images/illo171.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..307a6cb --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo171.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo175.png b/35916-h/images/illo175.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..62299b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo175.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo176.png b/35916-h/images/illo176.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..bbf69fe --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo176.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo177.png b/35916-h/images/illo177.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8339b28 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo177.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo178.png b/35916-h/images/illo178.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6437936 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo178.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo180.png b/35916-h/images/illo180.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f8fde41 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo180.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo181.png b/35916-h/images/illo181.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6bb9577 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo181.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo183.png b/35916-h/images/illo183.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7051f67 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo183.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo184.png b/35916-h/images/illo184.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9d284bf --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo184.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo190.png b/35916-h/images/illo190.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..af14ca6 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo190.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo195.png b/35916-h/images/illo195.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..cd248c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo195.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo201.png b/35916-h/images/illo201.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7cf0032 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo201.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo202.png b/35916-h/images/illo202.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..78fe774 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo202.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo205.png b/35916-h/images/illo205.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..11236d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo205.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo210.png b/35916-h/images/illo210.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d248747 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo210.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo214.png b/35916-h/images/illo214.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0e69700 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo214.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo218.png b/35916-h/images/illo218.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0bc8be0 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo218.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo219.png b/35916-h/images/illo219.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b1eb78b --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo219.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo224.png b/35916-h/images/illo224.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d255e9d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo224.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo225.png b/35916-h/images/illo225.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8c488bd --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo225.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo229.png b/35916-h/images/illo229.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d35cfbf --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo229.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo231.png b/35916-h/images/illo231.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f69ad5f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo231.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo233.png b/35916-h/images/illo233.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..faed4d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo233.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo237.png b/35916-h/images/illo237.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d15e6ad --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo237.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo238.png b/35916-h/images/illo238.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f75e481 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo238.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo239.png b/35916-h/images/illo239.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..38db5d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo239.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo240.png b/35916-h/images/illo240.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b744d2c --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo240.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo242.png b/35916-h/images/illo242.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..198d402 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo242.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo243.png b/35916-h/images/illo243.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..379403d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo243.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo244.png b/35916-h/images/illo244.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5e71ceb --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo244.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo247.png b/35916-h/images/illo247.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4a951d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo247.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo253.png b/35916-h/images/illo253.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..bf20f11 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo253.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo263.png b/35916-h/images/illo263.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..33ed595 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo263.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo265a.png b/35916-h/images/illo265a.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..05c62c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo265a.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo265b.png b/35916-h/images/illo265b.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3278b0c --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo265b.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo266.png b/35916-h/images/illo266.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..70c37aa --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo266.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo267.png b/35916-h/images/illo267.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b2c706b --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo267.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo269.png b/35916-h/images/illo269.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..87d4f77 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo269.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo272a.png b/35916-h/images/illo272a.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1453d58 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo272a.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo272b.png b/35916-h/images/illo272b.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7f532be --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo272b.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo274.png b/35916-h/images/illo274.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e8c7af1 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo274.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo275.png b/35916-h/images/illo275.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9fbb10f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo275.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo278.png b/35916-h/images/illo278.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a940ce6 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo278.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo280.png b/35916-h/images/illo280.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2811b79 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo280.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo281.png b/35916-h/images/illo281.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..fd28c35 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo281.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo283.png b/35916-h/images/illo283.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..bcc1ec2 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo283.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo285a.png b/35916-h/images/illo285a.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d818d29 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo285a.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo285b.png b/35916-h/images/illo285b.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6e8f9fb --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo285b.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo289.png b/35916-h/images/illo289.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..577adba --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo289.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo291.png b/35916-h/images/illo291.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..fd19e25 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo291.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo292a.png b/35916-h/images/illo292a.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2497af2 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo292a.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo292b.png b/35916-h/images/illo292b.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5133f94 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo292b.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo296.png b/35916-h/images/illo296.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..255929b --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo296.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo297.png b/35916-h/images/illo297.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..27ade9f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo297.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo299.png b/35916-h/images/illo299.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..696718b --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo299.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo301.png b/35916-h/images/illo301.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e0d2903 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo301.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo302.png b/35916-h/images/illo302.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2f8a86d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo302.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo303.png b/35916-h/images/illo303.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..63f89d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo303.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo317.png b/35916-h/images/illo317.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..067d5b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo317.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo318.png b/35916-h/images/illo318.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b5b8cc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo318.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo329.png b/35916-h/images/illo329.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b5de68f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo329.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo335.png b/35916-h/images/illo335.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3448627 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo335.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo336.png b/35916-h/images/illo336.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e71f3a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo336.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo339.png b/35916-h/images/illo339.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e797a06 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo339.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo340.png b/35916-h/images/illo340.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e94f71d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo340.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo346.png b/35916-h/images/illo346.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..23097ac --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo346.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo347.png b/35916-h/images/illo347.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c9c480d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo347.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo348.png b/35916-h/images/illo348.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..fb92568 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo348.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo349.png b/35916-h/images/illo349.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..544180e --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo349.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo356.png b/35916-h/images/illo356.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2d3b96e --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo356.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo358.png b/35916-h/images/illo358.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ff622c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo358.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo360.png b/35916-h/images/illo360.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a7bc2a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo360.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo361.png b/35916-h/images/illo361.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0734565 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo361.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo362.png b/35916-h/images/illo362.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6b13a09 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo362.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo363.png b/35916-h/images/illo363.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6d9be4d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo363.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo364.png b/35916-h/images/illo364.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e6e47e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo364.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo368.png b/35916-h/images/illo368.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a7e3ffe --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo368.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo369.png b/35916-h/images/illo369.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..611f81a --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo369.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo370.png b/35916-h/images/illo370.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5faa7d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo370.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo372.png b/35916-h/images/illo372.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..edd3abe --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo372.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo373.png b/35916-h/images/illo373.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7b27d8b --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo373.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo374.png b/35916-h/images/illo374.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5843d6e --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo374.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo375.png b/35916-h/images/illo375.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..13f4904 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo375.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo376.png b/35916-h/images/illo376.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..642ca3b --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo376.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo381.png b/35916-h/images/illo381.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c21644d --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo381.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo382.png b/35916-h/images/illo382.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..04ff286 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo382.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo383.png b/35916-h/images/illo383.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..84ebcc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo383.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo384.png b/35916-h/images/illo384.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a31e116 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo384.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo388.png b/35916-h/images/illo388.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f1ac975 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo388.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo390.png b/35916-h/images/illo390.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..19ef76e --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo390.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo391.png b/35916-h/images/illo391.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e17b523 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo391.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo392.png b/35916-h/images/illo392.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..107c08a --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo392.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo393.png b/35916-h/images/illo393.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..88d3db5 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo393.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo396.png b/35916-h/images/illo396.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..83069aa --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo396.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo397.png b/35916-h/images/illo397.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e6ca28f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo397.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo398.png b/35916-h/images/illo398.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0428269 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo398.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo399.png b/35916-h/images/illo399.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..11da173 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo399.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo401.png b/35916-h/images/illo401.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e0f28a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo401.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo407.png b/35916-h/images/illo407.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1149b38 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo407.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo408.png b/35916-h/images/illo408.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5f0bd87 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo408.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo410.png b/35916-h/images/illo410.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b6f518c --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo410.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo411.png b/35916-h/images/illo411.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9092e23 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo411.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo413.png b/35916-h/images/illo413.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..16b8948 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo413.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo414.png b/35916-h/images/illo414.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..279e66f --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo414.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo416.png b/35916-h/images/illo416.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1d3af97 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo416.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo417.png b/35916-h/images/illo417.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f3cdb7c --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo417.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo418.png b/35916-h/images/illo418.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8308b44 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo418.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo420.png b/35916-h/images/illo420.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0764c3a --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo420.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo427.png b/35916-h/images/illo427.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f05a879 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo427.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo428a.png b/35916-h/images/illo428a.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..63f06fe --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo428a.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo428b.png b/35916-h/images/illo428b.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b1c3cd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo428b.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo430.png b/35916-h/images/illo430.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d2a2daf --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo430.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo431.png b/35916-h/images/illo431.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..86f76ea --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo431.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo434.png b/35916-h/images/illo434.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5245f2e --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo434.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo437.png b/35916-h/images/illo437.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5e04d42 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo437.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo442.png b/35916-h/images/illo442.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..73d4240 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo442.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo443.png b/35916-h/images/illo443.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..14e6a2e --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo443.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo445.png b/35916-h/images/illo445.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9cd8c10 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo445.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo461.png b/35916-h/images/illo461.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5ad66c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo461.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo466.png b/35916-h/images/illo466.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..6e26120 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo466.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo470.png b/35916-h/images/illo470.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..690a4e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo470.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illo508.png b/35916-h/images/illo508.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..160b2b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illo508.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/illocover.jpg b/35916-h/images/illocover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e2edabb --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/illocover.jpg diff --git a/35916-h/images/large092.jpg b/35916-h/images/large092.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..dba263c --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/large092.jpg diff --git a/35916-h/images/large166.png b/35916-h/images/large166.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a0167d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/large166.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/large190.png b/35916-h/images/large190.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..39cc2d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/large190.png diff --git a/35916-h/images/large361.png b/35916-h/images/large361.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7125e49 --- /dev/null +++ b/35916-h/images/large361.png |
